Introduction to the criticism and interpretation of the Bible : designed for the use of theological students, Bible classes, and high schools : Vol. I

INTRODUCTION

CRITICISM AND INTERPRETATION

OF

THE BIBLE,

DESIGNED FOR THE USE

THEOLOGICAL STUDENTS, BIBLE CLASSES, AND HIGH
SCHOOLS.

BY 0. E. STOWE,

PROFESSOR OF BIBLICAL LITERATURE, LANE SEMINARY, CINCINNATI,

IN TWO VOLUMES.

VOL. I.

CINCINNATI:

COREY, FAIRBANK & WEBSTER.

1835,

Entered according to act of Congress, in the year 1835,

BY COREY, FAIRBANK & WEBSTER,

In the Clerk's Office of the District Court of Ohio.

CINCINNATI :

PRINTED BY F. S. BENTON,

S. E. corner Main and Fifth streets.

CONTENTS.

PREFACE.
CHAPTER FIRST.

OF REVELATION AND THE LANGUAGE IN WHICH IT IS
GIVEN.

Revelation and inspiration — Perfectness of revela-
tion— Language of revelation — Perverse interpreta-
tion— Revelation to be interpreted by the common
laws of language — Revelation designed to exercise
the moral and intellectual powers, p. 13-25.

CHAPTER SECOND.

PECULIARITIES OF THE BIBLE IN RESPECT TO INTERPRE-
TATION.

Results from the preceding chapter — Peculiarities
of the bible — Relative perfection of the bible — Pecu-
liarities of prophecy — Typical representation, 26-35.

CHAPTER THIRD.

PROOF THAT MOSES WAS THE WRITER OF THE FIVE BOOKS
USUALLY ASCRIBED TO HIM.

Name of these books — Authenticity of these books
—Circumstantial evidence of the authorship of Mo-

JV CONTENTS.

ses — Direcl testimony that these books were written
by Moses — Recapitulation of the argument, 36-50.

CHAPTER FOURTH.

HYPOTHESES OF THOSE WHO REJECT THE AUTHORSHIP OF
MOSES. THEHt OBJECTIONS STATED AND. ANSWERED.

Various hypotheses — Hypothesis of Hobbes —
Peyrere — Spinoza — Simon — LeClerc — Hasse — Ful-
da— Nachtigall— Vater — Bertholdt— de Wette— Vol-
ney — Objections to the authorship of Moses — Sum-
mary view of the argument — Conclusion, 37-71.

CHAPTER FIFTH.

ORIGIN OF ALPHABETIC WRITING.

Progress of the ancients in the arts and sciences —
Most ancient materials of writing— Importance of
alphabetic writing — All alphabets from one source —
Alphabetic WTiting of Shemitish origin — Process of
forming the original alphabet — Historical testimony
— Alphabetic writing not of Phenician origin — Al-
phabetic writing not of Egyptian origin — Hiero-
glyphic writing — Summary of results — Concluding
remarks — Note, 72-98*

CHAPTER SIXTH.

■'■ AUTHENTICITY OF THE FOUR GOSPELS.

Origin of the gospels — Original mode of publica-
tion— Canonical authority — Credibility of the gos-
pels, es-'iH.

CONTENTS. V

CHAPTER SEVENTH.

CHARACTER OF THE GOSPELS.

General remarks — Gospel of Matthew — Mark —
Luke — John — Relation of the gospels to each other,

115-136.

CHAPTER EIGHTH.

GENUINENESS OF THE APOCALYPSE.

Introductory remarks — The millennial controversy
— The Apocalypse then first questioned — Testimony
in favor of the book — Objections to the Apocalypse,

137-151.

CHAPTER NINTH.

INTERPRETATION OF THE APOCALYPSE.

General design of the book — Plan and contents of
the book — Prophetic application of the book — Gen-
eral remarks on prophecy, 152-167.

CHAPTER TENTH.

HEBREW AND PAGAN PROPHETS CONTRASTED.

Introductory remarks — Hebrev^ and pagan reli-
gions— Prophets of ancient Greece — Greek oracles —
Oracles of Apollo and Trophonius — Character of the
oracular responses — Manners and character of the
Hebrew^ prophets — Subjects and character of their
prophecies — Illustrations from the Old Testament
— The contrast — Fulfilment of prophecy — Predic-
tions respectings Cyrus — Babylon — Other prophe-
cies, 168-200.
1*

VI CONTENTS.

CHAPTER ELEVENTH.

* DOCTRINE OF INSPIRATION.

Ideas of divine influence in the earliest ages —
Ideas of inspiration among the Greeks and Romans —
Ideas of the ancient Hebrews — Ideas of the primitive
christians — Ideas of the reformers and their succes-
sors— Concluding remarks, 201-217.

CHAPTER TWELFTH.

SCRIPTURAL IDEA AND PROOF OF INSPIRATION.

Scriptural idea of inspiration — Scriptural proof of
inspiration — Divine authority of Christ — Of the apos-
tles—Of Mark and Luke — Of Paul— Objections-
Divine authority of the Old Testament — Influence of
the bible, 218-253.

CHAPTER THIRTEENTH.

MIRACLES.

Scriptural names of miracles — Idea of a miracle —
Miracles in unenlightened periods — Miracles not
contrary to nature — Miracles not contrary to expe-
rience— Use of miracles in a system of religion — True
miracles can be distinguished from false, 254-276.

PREFACE,

During the last winter, I was invited by Dr.
Beecher to deliver a course of sabbath evening lec-
tures in the Second Presbyterian church in Cincin-
nati, on topics pertaining to the criticism and inter-
pretation of the bible. The lectures were accord-
ingly delivered; and they were listened to with a
degree of interest and approbation, which was to
me entirely unexpected and highly gratifying. It
was repeatedly suggested to me, that a publication
of the lectures would be of real service to the cause
of Christianity, particularly in the West. After much
deliberation, I concluded, instead of publishing the
lectures as they were delivered, to prepare from
them a work in a different form on the same topics.

It is my object in this work to give a brief and
clear statement of the principles and facts most
necessary to be known, preparatory to the critical
study of the scriptures. By endeavoring to combine
thoroughness of investigation with simplicity in the
mode of exhibition, I have hoped that the book may
meet the wants of the theolomcal student and the

Vlll PREFACE.

critical scholar, and at the same time be easily acces-
sible to both teacher and pupil in the bible class,
the sabbath school, and the family. The first vol-
ume is now before the public, and they are to judge
of its fitness to accomplish the object proposed.
The second will be ready for the press during the
coming winter, and will contain a history of the
text of the Old and New Testaments, a brief ac-
count of the principal manuscripts and critical edi-
tions, and a particular introduction to each of the
remaining books of the bible, similar to those here
given to the Pentateuch, the Gospels, and the Apo-
calypse.

In the arrangement of topics, I have endeavored
to adopt that method, by which the discussion of
each preceding subject will throw most light on the
succeeding, and the greatest clearness be secured
with least of repetition. A careful attention to the
order of the topics will satisfy the intelligent reader
that this has been the object, and I hope it has been
to some extent attained.

I know of no work in the English language, which
professes to occupy the ground that I have endeav-
ored to cover in the following pages. The works
which I have seen on the same subjects are either
too voluminous and expensive for common use, or
too brief and meagre to satisfy the demands of the
present stage of biblical inquiry. Many distinguished

PREFACE. IX

teachers, who have wished to introduce the study of
the bible into their academies and high-schools, have
expressed an earnest wish to obtain some compre-
hensive work, which should give a satisfactory dis-
cussion of the topics prerequisite to the intelligent
study of the scriptures. It was with the hope of
promoting the introduction of this all-important
study into our schools and literary institutions, and
on a suggestion to that effect from one of our most
able and experienced teachers, that the following
publication w^as undertaken.

In regard to the historical evidences for the truth
of Christianity, I refer continually to Dr. Paley, whose
masterly treatise on that subject I hope will be con-
tinued as a text-book in every institution of learn-
ing, where the English language" is spoken. As a
clear and unanswerable exhibition of historical testi-
mony, it has never been excelled; though, like most
English writers on the subject, the author seems too
little familiar with the soul and life-giving power of
the religion of Christ, and rests its authority too
exclusively on miracles and external evidence. As
it is, however, the professed object of Paley's work
to give the external evidence, the deficiency can be
supplied by other treatises, such as those of Erskine
and Dr. Chalmers, particularly his astronomical dis-
courses.

X I*REFACE. J

Too many of the English writers, probably through
the influence of the ridicule which followed the fanat-
icism of the seventeenth century, have defended
Christianity by sacrificing all that is valuable in it to
appease its enemies, and bringing it down to the stan-
dard of a rational deism. They show great regard
for the christian religion, but appear quite ashamed
of all its peculiar doctrines. Even the noble work
of bishop Butler, though vastly superior to most of
its cotemporaries in christian feeling and courage, is
scarcely free from objection in this respect. Such
defences ruin the cause they profess to sustain ; and
the Word of God stands in no need of defence by
concessions and apologies. Professor Tholuck has
well remarked, that 'most of the English apologists
are like the stupid householder, who cries ^re and
murder when the thief comes, and at the same time
throws his most valuable household stuff out of the
window. To save the shell, they give up the kernel.'
(Litterarischer Anzeiger, Jahrg. 1831. col. 549).

It is hoped that a different spirit has been awak-
ened, and that the peculiarities of the religion of
Christ will be always insisted upon, in every attempt
to vindicate it against the assaults of unbelievers.

C. E. S,
Walnut Hills, July 31st, 1835^

Eruata.
Page 103, bottom line, for 1 read 13.
Page 120, 2d line from bottom, for 9 read 3.

INTRODUCTION

TO THE

CRITICISM AND INTERPRETATION

OP

THE BIBLE.

CHAPTER FIRST.

OF REVELATION AND THE LANGUAGE IN WHICH IT IS
GIVEN.

I. REVELATION AND INSPIRATION.

To reveal is to make knov^n something which was
before unknown; and divine revelation is the direct
communication of truth, before unknown, from God
to men. Difficulty has frequently arisen on this sub-
ject from confounding revelation with inspiration*
As J. D. Michaelis remarks (Compend. Theol. p. 29),
'the words inspiration and revelation are to be distin-
guished from each other; for the former (inspiration)
has a more general meaning, while the latter (revela-
tion) refers to those things only of which the sacred
writers were ignorant before they were divinely
taught. They who confound these words, are ac-
customed to invent empty objections; as how it were
possible, that things very well known to the sacred
2

14 REVELATION AND ITS LANGUAGE.

historians by ordinary means, should be revealed to
them, which they pronounce to be absurd, as it really
is; but yet the writers of the bible might be moved
by divine impulse to commit to writing matters
with which they were before well acquainted, and
these things might be so brought to their minds by
the Holy Spirit, that there would be no danger of
erring.'

This distinction is in exact accordance with the
declaration of our Saviour to his disciples (John xiv.
26; xvi. 12, 13); where the twofold office of the
Holy Spirit, of bringing to remembrance things be-
fore known by other means, and of revealing new
truths, is clearly recognized. The word inspiration^
by the custom of speech, includes both these opera-
tions of the Spirit; the word revelation only the lat-
ter. Accordingly, revelation may be defined as that
act of the Holy Spirit, by w^hich truths before un-
known are communicated to men; and inspiration^
the act of the Spirit by which (not only unknown
truths are communicated, but by which also) men are
excited to publish truths for the instruction of others,
and are guarded from all error in doing it. Thus it
was revealed to the ancient prophets that the Messiah
should appear, and they were inspired to publish this
fact for the benefit of others. The affecting scenes
at the cross of Christ were not revealed to the apostle
John, for he saw them with his own eyes (John xix.
35); but he was inspired to write a history of this
.event, and by supernatural guidance was kept from
all error in his record. It is, therefore, true, as the
apostle Paul affirms (2 Tim. iii. 16) that all scripture

REVELATION AND ITS LANGUAGE. 15

is given by inspiration of God; though every part of
the bible is not the result of immediate revelation.
Let this distinction be carefully kept in view, and
many objections which are often urged with great
confidence against the inspiration of certain parts of
the bible, and many difficulties which honest minds
sometimes feel, vanish at once.

For convenience sake we call the whole bible a
REVELATION, bccause most of the truths which it con-
tains, were made known by direct communication
from God, and could have been discovered in no other
way ; and generally it is only the incidental circum-
stances attending the communication of these truths,
that could be ascertained by the writers in the ordi-
nary modes of obtaining information.

Inspiration, therefore, does not exclude diligent
and faithful research on the part of the sacred writers
(Luke i- 1-4); nor onf §aerod writer quoting from
another (as Micah iv. from Isaiah ii); nor a sacred
writer making use of documents furnished by unin-
spired men, for the ascertaining of facts, (as the Book
of Jasher, and the Book of Jehovah's Wars, Josh. x.
13; Num. xxi. 14); nor the characteristic peculiarities
of style and manner, resulting from diversity of intel-
lectual structure, education, and other circumstances,
such as we observe when we compare Isaiah with.
Ezekiel, or John with Paul.

II. PEKFECTNESS OF REVELATION.

Having thus settled the notion of revelation, we
next inquire, what is essential to the perfectness of a
revelation? On this point difficulties often arise from

16 REVELATION AND ITS LANGUAGE,

the merely accidental association of ideas; many
seeming to imagine, that because the revelation itself
is alleged to be perfect, therefore, there should be no
incidental circumstances of imperfection attending
its publication among men. But let us learn to dis-
tinguish the things that differ. What is a perfect
revelation but perfect truth clearly communicated?
In oral revelation, the person chosen as the organ of
communication may be young or old, elegant or rus-
tic, his features may be beautiful or plain, his voice
melodious or harsh, his manner easy or awkward, his
language ornamented or simple, and the perfectness
of the revelation not be in the least affected by any
of these circumstances. In written revelation, then,
is the form of the book at all essential to the perfect-
ness of the revelation? or the binding? or the mate-
rials of which the book is made? Must ink become
unfading, and paper impp.rishable, when used for the
recording of a revelation, or the revelation itself be-
come imperfect? Must writers, or copiers, or print-
ers, become exempt from human frailty, so soon as
they are employed about a book containing revela-
tions ? Must the manner and style of revelation be
adapted to any particular set of circumstances, or
conformed to any one standard of taste? In a book
designed for universal use this would obviously be
improper and absurd. The Chinese, the Esquimaux,
the South-sea Islanders, have as much right to claim
that the bible should be throughout conformed to
their peculiar circumstances and tastes, as the Ger-
mans, the French, or the English. Revelation must
bear the prevailing impress of the circumstances and

REVELATION AND ITS LANGUAGE. 17

tastes of the times and nations, in which it was ori-
ginally given. The bible, however, though it bears
the distinct impress of Asiatic manners, as it should
do, being originally an Asiatic book, is most remarka-
ble for rising above local and temporary peculiari-
ties, and seizing on the great principles common to
human nature under all circumstances.

In order to make a revelation perfect, must its lan-
guage be any other than human language ? And, if
human language, is it not necessarily, in itself, imper-
fect language?

The only question of any importance on this point
is, can the meaning of revelation be accurately ascer-
tained? We answer, that the meaning of the bible,
by the use of appropriate means, can be ascertained
with unfailing accuracy for all practical purposes;
and these are the only purposes for which the bible
was given.

III. LANGUAGE OF REVELATION.

The language of the bible is the language of men,
(otherwise it would be of no use to men); and it is to
be understood just as all other human language is
understood. It is addressed to the common sense of
men, and common sense is to be consulted in its
interpretation.

This is necessary, because

1. No human language has a distinct sound for
every distinct idea; and the same word must have
several meanings. In English, for example, the word
letter has several different meanings; and which one
is intended is always made plain to common sense by
2*

18 REVELATION AND ITS LANGUAGE.

the connection in which it stands, and the nature of
the subject to which it is applied.

' The child is learning its lettersJ*
'The merchant is writing his letters,^
' Dr. Johnson was a man of letter sJ^

Who that has common sense ever thinks of con-
founding the different meanings of the word letters in
the three sentences above quoted? The same use of
words occurs in the bible, and the meaning is to be
ascertained in the same way.

Again, common sense is to be consulted in the
interpretation of the bible, because

2. Language is sometimes literal and sometimes
figurative; and the connection and the nature of the
subject must always determine which sense, the lite-
ral or the figurative, is intended.

'The bird^ze^ into its nest.'
'The mViXi flies into a passion.'

is there any difficulty in determining which sense
of the word flies is intended in each of the above sen-
tences? vSo when we say of a mass of lead, that it
has great weight, the nature of the subject shows that
we use the phrase literally, and mean that the mass is
very heavy; but when we say of the opinion of a
judge, that it had great weight in deciding a legal
question, the nature of the subject shows that we
use the phrase figuratively, and mean that his opinion
had great influence.

There is just the same sort of figurative language
m the bible, and it is to be understood by just the
same means.

' REVELATrON AND ITS LANGUAGE. 19

In further illustration of this point, examine the
first stanza of Gray's Ode on Spring.

* Lo ! where the rosy-bosomed hours,

Fair Venus' train appear,
Disclose the long- expecting flowers.

And wake the purple year!
The Attic warbler pours her throat j
Responsive to the cuckoo's note,

The untaught harmony of spring ;
While, whispering pleasure as they fly,
Cool zephyrs through the clear blue sky

Their gathered fragrance fling.''

Here are as many figures as there are lines, and
many of them as bold as any we find in the bible;
and yet how could the same ideas, in any other way,
be expressed with so much clearness, vivacity, and
beauty ?

Figurative language is always, not only more vivid
and beautiful, but plainer and more permanent than
literal; for the objects of nature, from which fig-
ures are drawn, remain always the same, while
the meaning of words is perpetually changing.
When the patriarch Jacob called his son Judah a
lioTi's whelp (Gen. xlix. 9), he expressed a distinctive
feature of his character in terms which could not
then be mistaken, and whose meaning no subsequent
changes of language could ever obscure. Ideas, par-
ticularly, pertaining to intellectual and moral sub-
jects, can seldom be expressed literally, so as to be
understood by the mass of mankind. The language
of common life abounds with figures; and the more
illiterate and simple men are, the more frequent and
free is their use of figurative language. This has

20 REVELATION AND ITS LANGUAGE. •

always been remarked in respect to savage nations,
and it is equally true of the illiterate classes among
civilized people. Go among the laborers and seamen
of the Atlantic states, or the backwoodsmen and
boatmen of the West, and you will scarcely hear a
literal expression; almost every idea is expressed in
the boldest figures. Hear an Ohio boatman bantering
with his fellow, and if he threatens to put him into
the river unless he is quiet, it is in language like this:
'If you don't mind, sir, I'll spill you into the drink.'

Several causes combine to make the bible particu-
larly rich in figurative language. It is designed for
common use, and treats principally of moral and re-
ligious subjects, which can be made plain to the com-
mon understanding only by figurative expressions;
it was written in the primitive ages and among a sim-
ple people; and it is the product of Asiatic mind:
and by reason of its highly figurative style, which is
sometimes urged against it as a defect, it commends
itself the more readily to the common sense of men,
and is the less affected by the changes which take
place in manners and language.

IV. PERVERSE INTERPRETATION.

But though figurative language is easily under-
stood, it is also easily perverted; and most of the per-
verse interpretations of the bible arise from the abuse
of its figurative language, or of its terms whose
meaning is ambiguous, till determined by the con-
nection in which they stand. The difficulties of in-
terpreting the bible and the differences of opinion in
regard to its meaning, do not owe their origin to any

REVELATION AND ITS LANGUAGE. 21

intrinsic obscurity, but to habits of perverse inter-
pretation, which unhappily have so long prevailed.
The bible is treated sometimes as if fancy and not
reason were the proper organ to elicit its meaning;
and at other times, because it is appealed to as au-
thority, and the interpreter is not willing to yield a
favorite opinion of his own, he adopts wrong princi-
ples of interpretation, and talks about allegory, or
the analogy of faith, in order to force the sentiments
of the bible to a conformity with his own opinions.
Every book, interpreted in this manner, must give
rise to various and contradictory opinions. While
the Greeks interpreted Homer allegorically, there
was as much controversy about his meaning as there
is now about the meaning of the bible; but so soon
as men became willing to let Homer speak for him-
self and to take him as h'e meant, controversy ceased.
So soon as mcii adopt ihc same course in regard to
the bible, the same result will follow, and not before.
I will endeavor to illustrate my meaning by a few
examples. Our Saviour says, / am the true vine.
Who ever thinks of understanding this literally? He
also says, / am the door. Who ever thinks of under-
standing this literally? And why are not these ex-
pressions to be literally understood? Because com-
mon sense teaches us that, literally taken, they are
utterly unintelligible; but figuratively understood,
they give just the meaning appropriate to the speak-
er's purpose. And does not common sense teach the
same thing in regard to another declaration of the
same speaker, respecting the sacramental bread,
namely, This is my body? How can this be literally

22 REVELATION AND ITS LANGUAGE.

understood without contradicting the evidence of all
the senses? Might not the Western Indian, who
worships a high rock, with equal propriety quote in
defence of his idolatrous practice, such passages as
these? Ascribe ye greatness unto our God. He is the
Rock. (Deut. xxxii. 3, 4.) Of the Rock that begat thee,
thou art unmindful, (v. 18.) Unto thee will I cry, O
Jehovah, my Rock. (Ps. xxviii. 1.) Christ says,
Knock, and it shall be opened. On such principles of
interpretation, we might assert that the salvation of
men depended on their going about and knocking,
no matter how or what, provided they knocked some-
thing that could be opened.

What absurdities would follow, if men were to in-
terpret the language of common life as they some-
times insist upon interpreting the bible! A man
once found a friend with a bottle of wine before him,

and making a hideous nuiao. 'What,' said h©^ 'my

dear sir, are you insane ?' ' No,' replied the friend,
'but my physician tells me I must take wine and
BARK.' Was the physician to be blamed for the use
of an ambiguous word, or the patient for not
applying common sense to the interpretation of the
prescription?

V. REVELATION TO BE INTERPRETED BY THE COMMON LAWS
OF LANGUAGE.

By interpreting the bible on the same principles by
which we instinctively interpret the language of com-
mon life, its true meaning may be easily ascertained,
and contrarieties of exposition avoided.

If the bible is not to be interpreted by the common
laws of language, then specific rules must be given

REVELATION AND ITS LANGUAGE. 23

for its interpretation, either by the bible itself, or by
some other divine authority. But these rules, if un-
derstood at all, must be understood by the common
laws of language; and how can it be any more diffi-
cult to understand revelation itself by the common
laws of language, than it is to understand by this
means the rules by which revelation is to be inter-
preted? Everywhere in the works of nature, we
see the greatest results accomplished by the fewest
possible instrumentalities; and in a revelation from
the God of nature w^e are not prepared to expect a
needless complexity of means. The bible gives no
such specific, peculiar rules for its own interpretation,
and all analogy is against the supposition of any such
thing.

Again, if there be an authorized interpreter of the
bible, his interpretations must be understood by the
common laws of language ; and why can we not un-
derstand revelation itself by the common laws of
language, as well as the interpretation of a revela-
tion?. What is the use of a revelation that cannot
be understood without an authorized interpreter?
And w^hat is the use of an authorized interpreter to
a revelation that can be understood without one ?
One or the other is certainly needless; and so need-
less an expenditure of means does not resemble the
simplicity of the divine economy in other things.
The bible gives no hint of any such power of author-
itative interpretation; and reason rejects the whole
theory as entirely groundless.

24 REVELATION AND ITS LANGUAGE.

VI. REVELATION DESIGNED TO EXERCISE THE MORAL AND
INTELLECTUAL POWERS.

All theories of allegorical and infallible interpreta-
tion are, for the most part, either the mere sport of
fancy, or an expedient for the getting rid of the plain
meaning of scripture, and the responsibilities which
belong to men as free, intelligent agents. The bible
was never intended to relieve men from the respon-
sibilities of thinking, searching, and judging — the
labor of intellectual and moral action; but on the
contrary, to increase these responsibilities and call
forth this action. It was never designed to pamper
the soul in idleness, and raise it to heaven as lifeless
matter is raised by a cord; but it was intended to
rouse up all the energies of the soul, to promote its
most healthful growth, and cause it to rise towards
heaven spontaneously, as the bird rises on her own
buoyant wing. Accordingly, wherever the bible is
the people's book, there is found an inquisitive, ac-
tive, enterprising, and intelligent population; and
wherever the bible is withheld from the people, there
is a corrupting mass of sluggish mind, ready to be
trampled upon by the foot of every tyrant.

God did not lay out the physical world with rail-
roads and canals in all convenient directions, and
cause habitations ready furnished to spring out from
the ground like the trees of the forest, and to every
habitation provide a garden well supplied with all
that might be necessary for the sustenance of a fam-
ily. Without a necessity for the labors of agricul-
ture, architecture, and the arts of life, the powers of
man would never be developed. Why is not man as

REVELATION AND ITS LANGUAGE. 25

well provided for in infancy as the brutes? In those
fruitful climes where there is any approach to this con-
dition, man, for want of exercise and effort, becomes
almost a brute. The physical world is so arranged
as to give the highest and most vigorous exercise to
the intellectual and physical energies of man; and
every part of this exercise is essential to his intellect-
ual and physical development.

So the bible is adapted to give the highest exercise
to the intellectual and moral powers of man, and
were this exercise to be superseded, his intellectual
and moral powers would never be developed, the
bible would cease to be a blessing, and man would
sink to the brute. There is no good to be obtained
by man without labor; and least of all is spiritual
good to Be indolently obtained.

CHAPTER SECOND.

PECULIARITIES OF THE BIBLE IN RESPECT TO INTERPRE-
TATION.

I. RESULTS FROM THE PRECEDING CHAPTER.

The preceding remarks are intended to establish
the two following principles, namely:

1. The language of the bible is human language,
and is to be understood by the same means and ac-
cording to the same laws, by which all other human
language is understood. And,

2. The bible has no need of a succession of author-
ized interpreters, and admits of no such thing; but
addresses itself directly to the practical reason and
common sense of all mankind.

II. PECULIARITIES OF THE BIBLE.

In establishing these principles, however, we must
not forget two others which are equally important.
They are these:

1. The bible has some peculiarities, which belong
to no other book, and so far as these peculiarities
are concerned, it has and must have laws of inter-
pretation in some respects peculiar. And

2. The writers of the New Testament are inspir-
ed and authorized interpreters of the Old.

Still, the common laws of language are never vio-
lated, nor even encroached upon, by these peculiar-

PECULIARITIES OF REVELATION. ^27

ities; but words and phrases are always used, which
are appropriate to express the ideas intended.

The three following are the principal peculiarities
of scripture, to which I allude:

1. Relative perfection. 2. Prophecy. 3, Typical
representation.

in. RELATIVE PERFECTION OF THE BIBLE.

By this I mean a perfection which is not absolute,
as God is said to be an absolutely perfect being; but
a perfection which has reference to some particular
end to be secured. As the language of the bible is
human language, it cannot be absolutely perfect, it is
in itself altogether imperfect; but yet the language of
the bible is perfect as respects its adaptation to the
end to be secured by it, namely, the religious educa-
tion of man as a free, intelligent, accountable being.

So the Mosaic institutions were not in themselves
the best possible, for Christianity is certainly better;
but they were the best possible for the times and the
circumstances to which they were adapted. They
were not absolutely perfect; but perfect relatively
to the end to be accomplished by them, namely, the
preparation of the world for the gospel dispensation.
The apostle declares, that the laio made nothing per-
fect^ but the hringing in of a better hope did (Heb. vii.
19); and, that the law was our schooolmaster to bring
us to Christ (Gal. iii. 24); and, that before faith came
we were kept under the law, shut up to the faith which
was afterwards to be revealed (v. 23).

After we have proved the bible to be a perfect
revelation, in the sense above explained, we have

2^

PECULIARITIES OF REVELATION.

two peculiar laws of interpretation, which apply to»
no other books.

1. We are not at hberty to censure the ends
which God proposes to himself in the bible, nor the
means, by which he accomplishes them; but we are
simply to ascertain what those ends and means are.

2. We are not at liberty to infer real contradic-
tions between the different waiters of the bible; but
where there is an apparent contradiction, we are to
suspend our judgment, investigate anew, and seek
modes of conciliation*

Neither of these rules, as is easily seen, affects the
laws of language; but they merely regulate the
inferences which we derive from meanings ascer-
tained in the usual mode.

In regard to the apparent discrepancies and real
diversities between the four evangelists, Chrysostom
has the following judicious remarks: 'This very
thing is the greatest proof of truth, for had they
agreed with exactness in every point, even to time,
and place, and very words, no one of their enemies
would have believed, that they had not been to-
gether and written what they wrote by some human
collusion; for so great symphony does not belong to
simplicity. But now the seeming discrepancy in
minute things clears them from all suspicion, and
strikingly vindicates the character of the writers. —
We think it meet that you should narrowly observe
this, that in principles, and in things pertaining to
life and doctrine, no one can any where find the least
dissonance among them.' (Preface to Matthew).

PECULIARITIES OF REYELATION. 29

IVr PECULIARITIES- OF PROPHECY.

If prophecy were merely anticipated history, we
should need here no' peculiar laws of interpretation;
but this is not the fact.

The costume and the symbols of prophecy are
altogether peculiar^ and entirely different from the
style and manner of pure history (See Matt. xxiv.
29; Acts ii. 19, 20).

Moreover, the prophets generally saw the events,
which they describe, actually transpiring before
them, and were not told of them by narrative. They
saw, in ecstatic vision, near events and remote in
juxtaposition, in space and not in time, with the idea
of succession merely without exact chronology; as
we see the stars in the firmament, all apparently at
nearly equal distances from the eye; or as the tow-
ers of a distant city seem to the eye spread out on
the curve of the horizon, and to rise from the edifices
between them and the observer. Time is designated
in but very few instances, and then generally in a
very peculiar and enigmatical manner. Two of the
most remarkable instances are the seventy years'
duration of the Babylonian captivity (Jer.. xxv. 11,
12); and the seventy weeks that were to precede the
coming of the Messiah (Dan. ix. 24).

A careful observance of this principle will greatly
aid in the right understanding of the prophets; and
will show why they almost always speak in the pre-
sent tense rather than the future. Examine the fol-
lowing passages as illustrations: Nahum sees the
overthrow of Nineveh, and listens to the tumult oc--
3*

30 PECULIARITIES OF REVELATION*

casioned by it (Nah. iii. 1-3). Isaiah sees the revel-
ings, the surprise, and the sudden massacre of the
Babylonians (Isaiah xxi. 1-9; see also verses 11, 12)^
So he sees the Babylonian king fall and go to Hades
(Isaiah xiv. 7-12). (Compare also Hab. iii. 3-12;
and Revr vi.-xii).

In accordance with this mode of prophetic vision,
remote events of the same kind are often intimately
conjoined, as though they were to occur in immedi-
ate connection; and the prophets themselves could
not always ascertain the time that was to intervene
between them. (See 1 Pet. i. 10-12).

Thus Isaiah connects the coming of the Messiah
and the millennium immediately with the Jewish de-
liverance from Assyrian oppression (Isaiah ix, x. xi;
compare Matt. iv. 15, 16); and also the same events
with the restoration from the Babylonian captivity
(Isaiah xl. and the following). The deliverance from
Assyria was to take place, as the prophet well knew,
two centuries earlier than the deliverance from
Babylonia; and he certainly knew that the coming
of the Messiah could not immediately succeed both
these events, yet he has joined this event to both the
former, in accordance with the genius and constant
custom of prophecy. For other examples, com-
pare Joel ii. 28 with Acts ii. 17; and Zech. ix,
9, 10 with Matt. xxi. 5.

So Christ, according to the universal rule of proph-
ecy, connects the day of judgment immediately with
the destruction of Jerusalem, predicting the latter i»
Matt. xxiv. and the former in Matt. xxv..

PECULIARITIES OF REVELATION. 31

In the prophetic peculiarities, also, it will be per-
ceived, that there is no violation of the common laws
of language. It is with the thoughts and not with
the words^ that these peculiarities are connected.

V. TYPICAL REPRESENTATION.

God proposed the whole plan of revelation to himself
from the first, and seeing the end from the beginning,
made the old dispensation preparatory to the new
and prefigurative of it (Col. ii. 17).

This holds true in reference to prophecy. Some-
times one person or event is taken as the represen-
tative or tijpe of some more remote and still greater
person or event, and language is used in regard to
both, the whole of which can be applied to neither
separately. Thus in 2 Sam. vii. (compare Heb. i. 5)
Solomon (the son and successor of David) and the
Messiah — the Hebrew temple and the Christian
church — are blended together in prophetic vision.
To this peculiarity of typical prophecy lord Bacon
refers, when he speaks of a ' latitude which is agree-
able and familiar unto divine prophecies, being of the
nature of their author, with whom a thousand years
are but as one day; therefore they are not fulfilled
punctually at once, but have springing and germinant
accomplishment throughout many ages, though the
height or fulness of them may refer to some one age.'
(Advancement of Learning, B. ii.) In this way
many of the Psalms are obviously understood by the
writers of the New Testament as having a twofold
reference.

32 PECULIARrTIES OF REVELATION.

Ps. xvi. compared with Acts ii. 25-31 and xiii. 35.

Ps. xxii. compared with Matt, xxvii. 35-50.

Ps. viii. with Heb. ii. Ps. xlv. with Heb* i.. 8.

This principle of one person being takest as the
representative or type of another, is so dearly re-
cognized in the bible, that even the proper names are
sometimes interchanged. Thus John Baptist is call-
ed Elijah (Mai. iv. 5 compared with Matt. xi. 14);
and Christ is called David (Ezek. xxxiv. 23, 24).

Events as well as persons may be typical, and
prophecies be uttered respecting them in the same
■way (Isaiah vii. 14-17 compared w^ith Matt. i. 22, 23).

This twofold reference of prophecy might some-
times be obscure, or even unknown, to the prophet
himself (See John xi. 50, 51).

It was a Jewish principle, that nothing would occur
under the new dispensation, which had not its cor-
responding outline in the old; and as to the Hebrew
priesthood and temple, we have the best evidence
for asserting, that they w^ere in all their details prefigu-
rative of the different parts of the Christian system
(Heb. ix. 7-20).

Indeed, I do not see how any one, who admits that
the writers of the New Testament are inspired and
authorized interpreters of the Old, can deny that
there is frequently a twofold reference in the predic-
tions of the Old Testament, and a typical meaning in
its institutions. The extravagancies of double sense,
allegories, and types, surely, constitute no sufficient
reason for the rejection or the concealment of a plain
matter of fact.

PECULIARITIES OF REVELATION. 33

The best rule, which I have seen, for the interpre-
tation of types, is the following, selected from bishop
Marsh's Theological Lectures (Part iii. p. 1 1 3 & 117).

'To constitute one thing the type of another, as the
term is generally understood in reference to scripture,
something more is wanted than mere resemblance.
The former must not only resemble the latter, but
must have been designed to resemble the latter. It
must have been so designed in its original institution.
It must have been designed as something preparatory
to the latter. The type, as well as the antitype,
must have been preordained; and they must have
been preordained as constituent parts of the same
general scheme of divine providence. It is this pre-
vious design and this preordained connection, which
constitute the relation of type and antitype. Where
these qualities fail, where the previous design and
preordained connection are wanting, the relation be-
tween the two things, however similar in themselves,
is not the relation of type and antitype.'

'For example, cardinal Bellarmine supposes that
the protestant secession under Luther was typified
by the secession of the ten tribes under Jeroboam;
while the Lutherans with equal reason retorted, that
Jeroboam was a type of the pope, and that the seces-
sion of Israel from Judah typified, not the secession
of the protestants under Luther, but the secession of
the church of Rome from primitive Christianity.
But to whichever of the two events the secession,
under Jeroboam may be supposed the most similar^
(if similarity exist there at all beyond the mere act
of secession) we have no authority for pronouncing

34 PECULIARITIES OF REVELATION.

it a type of either. We have no proof of previous
design and of preordained connection between the
subjects of comparison; we have no proof that the
secession under Jeroboam was designed to prefigure
any other secession whatever.^

The Old and New Testament both abound with
historical illustrations, which are often confounded
with typical representation, to the great hinderance of
a right understanding of the bible. To give a few
examples.

1. Particular facts illustrate general principles.
Deut. XXV. 4 compared with 1 Cor. ix. 9, 10.
Ps. xcv. compared with Hebrews iii. 7-19.

In this way the whole Israelitish history may illus-
trate individual christian experience.

2. Events illustrate events.

Judges vii. 22 compared with Isaiah ix. 4.
Num. xxi. 9 compared with John iii. 14.
Exodus xiv. compared with Isaiah xliii. 16, 17.

3. Like circumstances are expressed in the same
language.

Isaiah xxix. 13 compared with Matt. xv. 8.

Jer. xxxi. 15 compared with Matt. ii. 18.
These, and others of the same kind, are neither
types nor allegories, but simply historical illustra-
tions; like that of Luther, when he exclaimed to his
desponding followers: 'What! because you are em-
barked in the same ship with Christ, do you expect
a fair wind and smooth sea all the way ? Nay, rather
look out for storms and jeopardy, and that too while
your master is asleep!' (Compare Matt. viii. 23-27)*

PECULIARITIES OF REVELATION. 35

In all these cases, the language is plainly to be
interpreted by the common laws of language; and
the things only are typical or illustrative. There is
in fact, therefore, no case whatever, in which the lan-
guage of the bible is not to be understood just like the
language of all other books. It is the thoughts of
the scriptures, and not the words, which are super-
human.

In regard to types and allegories, we know of
none, excepting those which are explained as such in
the bible itself. All the rest are merely conjectural,
and, though often ingenious, are worse than idle,
leading the mind away from the truth, perverting it
by false principles of interpretation, and making it
the mere sport of every wild fancy. Any one who
wishes to see to what a pitch of extravagance this
thing can be carried, will do well to consult Sweden-
borg's ' True Christian Religion,' (particularly pages
168, 172, 202, of the Boston edition). Many of
the interpretations there remind us of the old com-
mentator, who thought that the lily-work around the
bellies of the pillars in the temple (1 Kings vii. 20,
22), signified, that ' if ministers would do their duty
and be pillars in the church, the Lord would take
care of their bellies.'

CHAPTER THIRD.

PROOF THAT MOSES WAS THE WRITER OF THE FIVE BOOKS
USUALLY ASCRIBED TO HIM.

I. KAME OF THESE BOOKS.

All manuscripts and printed editions of the He-
brew sacred books begin with the five usually ascrib-
ed to Moses. The old Hebrew name w^as ni^nn
nmn ^'li/D-in (i. e. cWmishsliah chumshae thorah) the
Jive-fiftUs of the law; or abreviated tzi^K^rsm n^nn (i. e.
cWmishshah chummashim) the five-fiftlts. Each book
by itself was called i^'^-in {chummash) a fifth. To
this the Greek appellation corresponds, namely,
„»T<«T£«xof (^pentateuchos) the fivefold volume^ from
TJVT£ five^ and '^'«='«f an implement or volume, (Ro-
senmueller's Prolegomena to Scholia on the Old Tes-
tament, vol. i. p. 1, 2).

The more common Hebrew name of the Penta-
teuch is n^inn (hattorah) the law; so called because
the books contain the civil and ecclesiastical law of
the Hebrew nation. The Hebrew name of the sep-
arate books was the first word or words in each.
Thus the first book was called n^B/«n3 (Vraeshith) i?i
the beginning, irom its first word; the second, nSx)
r\iDi^ {yPaeleh shhjioth) and these the names, from its
first two words; and so of the rest.

AUTHENTICITY OF THE PENTATEUCH. 37

The names in our English bible are derived from
the Greek translation called the Septuagint, and were
chosen by the Greek translators or editors as signifi-
cant of the subjects or contents of the several books.
Thus the first was called Genesis, because it gives an
account of the origin or genesis of the world; the
second was called Exodus, because it contains a his-
tory of the going out or exode of the Israelites from
Egypt; and so of the rest.

II. AUTHENTICITY OF THESE BOOKS.

In investigating this subject, I take it for granted,
that my readers know and acknowledge the follow-
ing facts :

1. That the books, composing what is now called
the Old Testament, originated with the Hebrew na-
tion, and were a part of their literature.

This fact is as obvious and as well ascertained as
any historical fact can be.

2. That these books were written at successive and
distant periods of time, and were generally known,
at least to the literary part of the nation, from their
first publication.

A simple inspection of the books, particularly in
the original language, will make this fact as plain in
reference to them, as it is in regard to any series of
English writers from the reign of Henry VIII. to the
present time.

3. That the leading historical circumstances, allud-
ed to in these books, such as the removal from Egypt,
the establishment in Canaan, the institution of mon-
archy, &c. are matters of fact.

4

36 AUTHENTICITY OF THE PENTATEUCH.

This is sustained by all historical testimony; and
besides, it is a necessary consequence of the admis-
sion of the two preceding postulates.

One other preliminary remark is necessary to the
subsequent argument.

The books of the Old Testament, particularly the
first five, are alleged to be of higher antiquity than
any other writings extant; and from the nature of
the case, the validity of this claim must be ascertain-
ed or impugned by an examination of the books
themselves, and not from contemporary sources, for,
by the very statement, there are none. If a man
were to affirm that he had spent twenty years en-
tirely alone on a desolate island, you would judge
what credit might be due to his story by a careful
observation of his language and character, the con-
sistency or inconsistency of his narrative, its agree-
ment or disagreement with other facts known to you
from other sources, and other circumstantial evi-
dence of a similar kind; and you would not require
him to bring witnesses to testify directly to the fact
asserted, that they knew from personal observation
that he had spent twenty years there entirely alone,
because they had been with him all the time and
had seen him.

Some infidel writers demand evidence in regard to
the bible fully as inconsistent with the nature of the
case as this would be ; and it is on such groundless
assumptions that the chief strength of their reason-
ing depends. From the very nature of the case, the
early books of the Old Testament must stand or fall
principally by internal evidence^ by evidence drawn

AUTHENTICITY OF THE PENTATEUCH. 39

from the books themselves; and' this, as I hope to
show, is abundantly sufficient to place them above
the reach of suspicion.

III. CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE OF THE AUTHORSHIP OF
MOSES.

The question then recurs, who was the writer of
the first five books of the Old Testament?

Universal tradition ascribes them to Moses, the
great lawgiver of the Hebrew nation. This is the
undivided and uncontradicted testimony of Jews and
Christians, orthodox and heretics, orientals and occi-
dentals, Persians and Arabians, Greeks and Romans.
It was first seriously called in question by Thomas
Hobbes of England, about A. D. 1650, at least three
thousand years after the first publication of the books.

We would observe, however, that in the second
century after Christ, the small sect of the Nazarenes
rejected these books, not on any critical grounds, not
that they ever attempted to prove them spurious;
but merely because they disliked some of the doc-
trines supposed to be contained in them. It was to
their religious authority, rather than to their gen-
uineness, that the Nazarenes objected.

We inquire, then, is there any thing in the books
themselves, which contradicts, or throws suspicion
over, this unanimous testimony of antiquity? What
is the circumstantial evidence in the case?

The whole character and structure of the books,
all the circumstantial evidence, ratifies and confirms
the testimony of antiquity, that Moses was the
writer.

40' AUTHENTICITY OF THE PENTATEUCH.

1 . These books were evidently written by a He-
brew\ The national language and peculiarities, and
especially the strong national feeling everywhere
manifested in these books, make this too obvious to
be denied; and indeed it is universally admitted.

2. They were evidently written by a Hebrew who
was well acquainted with every thing relating to
ancient Egypt and Arabia, with the climate, soil, and
productions of these countries, with their civil his-
tory, with the customs, modes of dress, and domestic
manners of the inhabitants ; and who was also famil-
iar with the religion and science of ancient Egypt.
Even a slight perusal of the books will satisfy any
one who is competent to judge, that this is the fact.

Now, wdth this statement compare the life of Mo-
ses as given in Exodus ii. iii. Moses was born in
Egypt and lived there forty years. He then went to
Arabia, there married, and lived forty years in that
country. He, therefore, had the best possible op-
portunity to become acquainted with every thing
relative to the natural and civil condition of those
two countries.

But how could Moses become familiar with the
religion and science of ancient Egypt? Egyptian
science was jealously guarded by a hereditary priest-
hood, and kept a profound secret even from native
Egyptians of the lower orders, much more from
slaves so oppressed and despised as the Hebrew^s
were. The sacerdotal order w^as the highest rank
of nobility in the nation; to it the king himself always
belonged; and in order to learn any thing of the
secrets of Egyptian wisdom, it was necessary to be

AUTHENTICITY OF THE PENTATEUCH. 41

on terms of personal familiarity with this proud and
jealous class of nobles. (Compare Herodotus, Book
ii. c. 3, 100, 111, 164, 168; and Jahn's Hebrew Com-
monwealth, translated by C. E. Stowe, Andover,
1828, p. 24). How could an enslaved Hebrew at-
tain such an elevation? We know how this hap-
pened in regard to Moses. Exposed in early infancy,
for the purpose of evading the cruel decree of a jeal-
ous tyrant, he fell into the hands of the daughter of
the Egyptian king, and adopted as her son, he be-
came learned iii all the wisdom of the Egyptians,
Moses is the only Hebrew known, who ever pos-
sessed this advantage; and if no other Hebrew ever
possessed this , advantage, no other one could have
written the Pentateuch.

3. The exact correspondence of narrative and in-
stitutions, shows that these books were written by
the author of the institutions.

The institutions are not given continuously, fully,
and in statute form. They are interspersed with
the narrative, and inserted just as the exigencies
arose which demanded them. Often they are at first
but slightly sketched, and when afterwards they were
misunderstood, they are repeated in more definite
language and with full explanations.

For example of the repetition and revision of laws
compare

Exod. xxi. 2-7 with Deut. xv. 12-17.

Num. iv. 24-33 with Num. vii. 1-9.

Num. iv. 3 with Num. viii. 24.

Lev. xvii. 3, 4 with Deut. xii. 5, 6, 21.

42f AUTHENTICITY OF THE PENTATEUCH.

Exod. xxii. 26 with Deut. xxiv. 6, 10-15.

Exod. xxii. 16, 17 with Deut. xxii. 29.
None but the lawgiver himself, who wrote from
day to day, as his laws became necessary, and revised
them whenever circumstances called for a revision^
and recorded in the same book the exigencies that
gave occasion to their enactment and revision, would
have written in this manner.

4. The interrupted and broken manner in which
the narratives and institutions are recorded, point to
Moses as the author.

Burdened with care, overwhelmed with business,
beset with dangers at the same time from his own
people and from their enemies, guiding a numerous
nation debased by slavery through a trackless and
barren wilderness, and preparing them for freedom
and for intellectual and moral elevation, he could write
only by snatches, and with a mind but ill at ease.

No author by profession would ever write fiction
or true history in a style like this; much less would
a religious impostor clothe his composition in such a
garb. All pretended revelations, from the Koran
down to the Book of Mormon, are of a more contin-
uous and uniform structure.

5. The difference between Deuteronomy and the
other books corresponds with the fact that Moses was
the writer.

Deuteronomy, unlike the other books, is written in
a continuous, oratorical, and parental style. The
patriarch speaks in the tones of authority and re-
buke, just as we should suppose Moses might talk in
his old age, after his journeyings and his perils were

■A
AUTHENTICITY OF THE PENTATEUCH. 43

over, the responsibilities of government committed
to other hands, and he was at leisure to speak out his
whole heart to a nation which had grown up from
childhood under his more than paternal care, and
which had been the object of his constant solicitude
and most intense exertions for more than half a
century.

6. The extreme brevity and simplicity of the
early parts of the narrative, and its gradual accumu-
lation till the time of Moses, when it at once assumes
a settled historical form, corresponds to the fact that
Moses was the author.

7. The agreement of the books with each other,
and the unity of design and the mode of execution
manifest through the whole, favors the supposition of
the authorship of Moses.

In short, so far' as the books themselves are con-
cerned, all the circumstantial evidence is in favor of
the concurrent testimony of antiquity, and there is
nothing at all against it.

IV. DIRECT TESTIMONY THAT THESE BOOKS WERE WRITTEN
BY MOSES.

By this testimony, two points are to be proved,
namely,

1. That the Hebrews, from the earliest times, have
had books which were written by Moses; and

2. That those were the same books which we now
possess.

Before entering on the examination of this proot,
turn back to section ii. of this chapter, and re-ex-
amine the three postulates there stated and conceded.

44 AUTHENTICITY OF THE PENTATEUCH.

1. The first direct testimony on the two points
above stated, is the declaration of the books them-
selves.

In Deut. xxxi. 9-13, 24-26, there is an express
injunction, that the vv^hole Mosaic code should be read
to all the people assembled at Jerusalem at the feast
of tabernacles every seventh year. If Moses w^rote
this precept, then the Mosaic books were generally
read every seven years to the assembled Hebrew
nation, from the time of the death of Moses till the
termination of their national existence; for we know
that the Hebrews generally were punctilious ob-
servers of the Mosaic laws, particularly of those
which have reference to feasts and ceremonies. On
this supposition, there is scarcely a possibility of de-
ception or corruption.

If Moses did not write this precept, then there
was a time subsequent to his death when it was first
introduced. On this supposition, the introducer of
it would have imposed upon himself the task of per-
suading all the adult citizens of his nation, that they
had heard the law of Moses publicly read every
seven years, when they had never heard any such
thing; or that they had been wilfully guilty in ne-
glecting one of the most explicit statutes of their civil
and ecclesiastical code. Would such deception have
been possible? Would not such a charge have ex-
cited to immediate investigation, and investigation
have lead to immediate detection? Would any im-
postor needlessly interpose so insurmountable an ob-
stacle to his own success?

AUTHENTICITY OF THE PENTATEUCH. 45

To illustrate the impossibility of such an imposition,
take an analogous example. A century or two
hence, some patriotic citizens of this country may
think it would be very useful to have the United
States' constitution publicly read to the assembled
people in all the principal cities and towns of the
union, once in every seven years. To effect so de-
sirable a purpose, they pretend that this was a law-
passed when the constitution was first adopted, and
not only passed but observed, and that thousands of
people then living had actually heard the constitu-
tion thus publicly read; or that the nation, for a long
time, had lived in open violation of the fundamental
law of the land. What success would be likely to
attend a measure pf this kind?

Is it objected that there were periods in the He-
brew history when the Mosaic law was neglected?
I answer, never for so long a time, that there were
not thousands of Hebrew citizens living, who could
remember w^hen it was strictly observed. Never so
universally, that there w^ere not hundreds who care-
fully perused the Mosaic law in private, and scrupu-
lously conformed their lives to it. Even during the
worst times of Israelitish idolatry, Jehovah declared
that he had reserved to himself seven thousand who
had not bowed to Baal (1 Kings xix. 18); and during
the long period of the Babylonian captivity, the Mo-
saic books and the writings of the subsequent proph-
ets, were to many pious Hebrews the chief solace of
their afflictions (Dan. ix. 2, 13). Consequently,
there has never been a time since the death of Moses,
when this precept could have been introduced. And

46 AUTHENTICITY OF THE PENTATEUCH.

if this precept were introduced by Moses himself, then
there has never been a time when his laws could
have been essentially corrupted or changed; for
since the Hebrews have lost their national indepen-
dence, the law of Moses has been read by them in
its original language, in every quarter of the globe,
every seventh day instead of every seventh year.
What possibility of practising such an imposition
upon them has ever existed?

Not only have we direct testimony, that the pre-
cepts and laws were recorded by Moses (Exod. xxiv.
4, 7; xxxiv. 27); but the historical narratives also
were committed to writing in the same book and by
the same hand (Exod. xvii. 14, "1353, bassepher, in the
book; Numb, xxxiii. 1, 2). The history, therefore,
stands on the same ground with the statutes; and
both always have been included, and are to the pre-
sent day included, under the general name of the law^
and the book of the law. The book of Deuteronomy
is full of appeals to this law, and the book of this
law (xvii. 18, 19); and in connections where the
reference is plainly to historical facts, and not to
mere precepts (xxviii. 61, compared with vs. 59, 60;
xxix. 19-27). Thus far we have direct testimony
from the books themselves.

2. The second class of direct testimony is that of
the subsequent historical books. These continually
refer to the books of Moses, as well known and famil-
iar to the whole nation, from the time of the death
of Moses to the termination of the Old Testament
history.

(See Josh. i. 7, 8; xxiii. 6. Compare Josh. xxiv.
26 with viii. 32, 34.

AUTHENTICITY OF THE PENTATEUCH. 47

See also 1 Kings ii. 3; 2 Kings xxii. 8; 2 Chron.
xxxiv. 14.)

To prove that these references are made to the
very same books of Moses which we now possess,
nothing more is necessary than to make a careful
comparison of the passages in the historical books
with the passages alluded to in the Pentateuch.
Thus, compare 2 Kings xiv. 6 with Deut. xxiv. 16.

2 Kings xxiii. 2-25 and 2 Chron. xxxv. 1-19 with
Lev. xxvi. 3-45, and Deut. xxvii. ll-xxviii. 68. In
this instance, the different precepts mentioned in the
historical books as particularly observed by king
Josiah, are scattered through various parts of the
Mosaic books, and very extensively cover the ground
in question.

Again, compare Ezra iii. 2-6 with Lev. vi. vii.

Ezra vi. 18 with Num. iii. 6-45; viii. 11, 14.

Compare Neh. i. 7-9 with Lev. xxvi. 41; and
Deut. iv. 26, 27; xxviii. 64; xxx. 3-5.

Thus every allusion in the historical books has its
corresponding passage in the Mosaic books; and
there is no discrepancy in this unbroken series of
incidental and unsuspected testimony, continued
through a period of more than a thousand years.
The books of Moses were completed about the year
1451 B. C, and Nehemiah, the last historical book of
the Old Testament, was not written till about the
year 430 B. C. It is important to notice, also, that
the series commences with Joshua, immediately after
the death of Moses.

3. The series of prophetical books affords testi-
mony, both as to the existence and identity of the

48 AUTHENTICITY OF THE PENTATEUCH.

five books of Moses, equally strong with that deduc-
ed from the historical books. To set this matter in
a clear light, let us take a few of the earlier prophets,
in the order of time, and compare their allusions to
the Mosaic law with the Pentateuch as we now
have it.

Joel lived about 650 years after Moses.
Compare Joel i. 9, 13 with Lev. ii. vi. 14; Num.
XV. 4,5,7; xxviii. 7,14; Deut. xii. 6,7; xvi. 10, 11.
Amos about 660 years after Moses.
Compare Amos ii. 9 with Num. xxi. 21, 24.
iv. 4 with Num. xxviii. 3, 4.
iv. 10 with Exod. vii-xi.
iv. 1 1 with Gen. xix. 24, 25.
ix. 13 with Lev. xxvi. 5.
Hosea about 670 years after Moses.
Compare Hosea ix. 10 with Num. xxv. 3.

xi. 8 with Gen. xix. 24, 25.
xii. 4, 5 with Gen. xxxii. 24, 25.
xii. 12 with Gen. xxviii. 5; xxix. 20.
Isaiah about 690 years after Moses.
Compare Isaiah i. 9-14 with Gen. xix. 4, and with
various precepts.
xii. 2 with Exod. xv. 2.
Ii. 2 with Gen. xii. 2; xvii. 2.
liv. 9 with Gen. viii. 21, 22.
Micah about 700 years after Moses.
Compare Micah vi. 5 with Num. xxii.-xxv.
vi. 6 with Lev. ix. 2, 3.
vi. 1 5 with Lev. xxvi. 1 6 ; Deut. xxviii. 33.
We might go on with the same process of proof
through the remainder of the prophets and the whole

AUTHENTICITY OF THE PENTATEUCH. 49

series of the New Testament. Indeed, so constant
is the reference and so exact the coincidence, that if
the Mosaic books were to be entirely destroyed, the
sense of them might be gathered, to a great extent,
from the subsequent parts of the bible. Yet so
great is the diversity of style and manner in these
subsequent books, as to prove conclusively, that they
must have been written by a succession of different
men, in distant ages, of different habits, and in cir-
cumstances altogether diverse.

V. RECAPITULATION OF THE ARGUMENT.

Thus in favor of the authenticity of the Mosaic
books, we have the unanimous testimony of antiquity,
with nothing in the books themselves to discredit it,
and every thing to confirm it.

We have the direct testimony of the books them-
selves, confirmed by the whole series of national
writers through a period (including the New Testa-
ment) of about fifteen hundred years.

We have observed, also, the impossibility of impo-
sition, interwoven as these books have always been
with the civil history, the political institutions, the
literature, and the religion of a proud and once pow-
erful nation; who alone have survived the wreck of
ages, and still exist, a living miracle in attestation of
the truth of a religion which they despise and hate,
suffering the full weight of the penalty denounced
in their own sacred books against their own obsti-
nate unbelief, and carefully preserving, as their pride
and their treasure, the volume which pronounces

50 AUTHENTICITY OF THE PENTATEUCH.

the awful sentence of their own condemnation,
(See Deut. xxviii. 15-68).

Pagan testimony, so far as there is any, confirms
the authenticity of the Mosaic books. We have all
the evidence which the nature of the case admits, and
tenfold more than that which satisfies us in regard
to the writings of Homer or Herodotus; and even
more than we have for the genuineness of the most
distinguished writings in our own language, such as
cthe works of Shakspeare and Milton.

CHAPTER FOURTH.

HYPOTHESES OF THOSE WHO REJECT THE AUTHORSHIP OF
MOSES. THEIR OBJECTIONS STATED AND ANSWERED.

I. VARIOUS HYPOTHESES.

I'hese hypotheses are all conjectural, and very
little is attempted towards establishing them, in the
way of argument. ^The whole force of argument is
expended in endeavoring to disprove the authorship
of Moses; and then liberty is freely taken to substitute
any wild fancy, that may happen to strike, in place
of the common opinion. The arguments will be
considered in the next section; here I shall merely
give a statement of the several hypotheses, in their
chronological order, according to the digest of pro-
fessor Rosenmueller, in the Prolegomena to his
Scholia on the Old Testament (vol. i. p. 17-29, third
edition, Leipsic, 1821).

1. 1650, Thomas Hobbes, the celebrated English
metaphysician and deist, in his work entitled 'Le-
viathan,' hazarded the conjecture, that the first five
books of the bible were called the books of Moses,
not because he wrote them, but because they relate
to transactions in which he was the principal mover.
He concedes, however, that Moses might have writ-

52 OBJECTIONS TO THE PENTATEUCH.

ten those particular passages which are said in the
books themselves to have been written by him (for
example, Exod. xvii. 8-14; Num. xxxiii. and the
like); and also the Hebrew code of laws in Deutero-
nomy x-xxvii.

2. 1655, Isaac Peyrere, a Frenchman and a lead-
ing writer of the sect of Prasadamites, who was wil-
ling to discredit the authority of the Mosaic books^
so far as they stood in the way of his favorite
theory of the existence of men on earth anterior to
Adam, conjectured that Moses kept a journal of the
more important transactions in which he was en-
gaged, to which he prefixed a chronicle of Jewish
affairs from Adam to his own times; but that these
books, with the ejcception of a few fragments, have
long since perished. This work, he supposes, was
the source whence the book of Jehovali's wars (Num.
xxi. 14) was derived, and from this last work the
book of Numbers was afterwards compiled.

3. 1670, Benedict Spinoza, the famous Jewish
pantheist, a man of great metaphysical talent and a
wayward mind, expressed the opinion (in Tract.,
theol. polit. c. viii. ix), that all the historical books
of the Old Testament, of which the earliest is Deu-
teronomy, were w^ritten by one author, whom he
supposes to be Ezra. As there is so little of connec-
tion between the several books, and such diversi-
ties of style and manner in them, he thinks that
Ezra must have been abruptly called off from his
work by some untoward accident, perhaps sudden
death, and have left it in a very unfinished- state

OBJECTIONS TO THE PENTATEUCH. 53

4. 1678, Richard Simon, a learned French cath-
olic, conjectures (Critical History of Old Testament,
B. I. c. ii. in French), that the Pentateuch was thrown
together after the death of Moses, from the notes of
the public scribes appointed by him, according to
the Egyptian custom, to record the public transac-
tions from day to day.

5. 1685, John LeCIerc, an active and learned
theologian of Holland, advanced the opinion, that the
Pentateuch was composed by the Hebrew priest,
who was sent by the king of Babylon to instruct
the Samaritans in the Hebrew religion (2 Kings
xvii. 27, 28). He afterwards acknowledged the
futility of this hypothesis and rejected it (Disserta-
tion ii. concerning the writer of the Pentateuch).

6. 1785, John G^odfrey Hasse, a German writer,
conjectured that the Pentateuch was composed at
the time of the Babylonian captivity, such fragments
of the Mosaic writings as then existed being incor-
porated with it. He also afterwards retracted and
refuted his own theory.

7. Frederic Charles Fulda, another German wri-
ter, is of opinion that some things contained in the
Pentateuch, such as the decalogue, the song after the
passage of the Red sea, &c. were written by Moses;
but that the body of the work was not composed
before the time of David.

8. John Christian Nachtigall supposes that a few
genealogical tables, some national songs and tradi-
tionary narratives, together with a few statutes en-
graven on stone and brazen tables, might have been
preserved from very early times. From these an-

5*

54 OBJECTIONS TO THE PENTATEUCH*

cient monuments, stories and ballads were written
by the students in the prophetic schools instituted by-
Samuel. Out of all these materials, the joint labors
of several learned men, perhaps under the superini-
tendence of Jeremiah, produced the Pentateuch at
the time of the Babylonian captivity. None of the
genuine wa'itings of Moses are preserved, except the
decalogue inscribed on tables of stone, the enumera-
tion of the journeyings of the Israelites through the
Arabian desert (Num. xxxiii), and a few short songs.

9. John Severin Vater, in his commentary on the
Pentateuch (in German), attempts to show that a
part of Deuteronomy and some portion of the other
books might have been written as early as the times
of David and Solomon ; but that the work could not
have been completed in its present form till after the
Babylonian captivity.

10. Leonard Bertholdt supposes that the Penta-
teuch was put into its present form by Samuel, and
deposited in the ark of the covenant; and that a copy
of this work, written on Egyptian linen by the hand
of Samuel, was the hook of the law found by Hilkiah
in the temple (2 Kings xxii. 8).

11. William M. L. de Wette. During the reign
of Josiah, a volume of the law was found in the tem-
ple (2 Kings xxii), which was only the book of Deu-
teronomy; and this is an epitome, by a later hand, of
the more ancient books. The other four books were
composed at different times, between the reign of
David arid that of Joram, principally near the time
of the Babylonian captivity.

OBJECTIONS TO THK PENTATEUCH. 55

12. Charles Francis Volney, a lively and versatile
French traveller, in his 'Researches on Ancient His-
tory' (Part I. c. vi-ix. in French), supposes that the
Pentateuch contains some things Vi^ritten by Moses;
but that the books which we now have are the result
of the joint labors of Hilkiah the priest, Jeremiah the
prophet, Shaphan the scribe, and Achbor, with the aid
of king Josiah; and that they were written for the
purpose of encouraging the Hebrews in their dan-
gerous collisions with Egypt, Babylon, and the
Scythians (See 2 Kings xxii.)

The hypothesis of professor Gesenius, which
agrees in the main with that of de Wette, is examin-
ed and completely refuted by professor Stuarl, in the
North American Review, for April 1826, and repub-
lished in the Biblical Repository, for October 1832.

Such are the most plausible hypotheses of the
most able men, who have rejected the authorship of
Moses; and what have they to stand upon? Com-
pare this mass of fog and contradiction with the un-
divided testimony of antiquity, that Moses was the
writer of the Pentateuch, and the exact coincidence
of this testimony with all the facts in the case, as
exhibited in the preceding chapter, and the over-
whelming amount of evidence from other sources ;
and then say how it is, if you can, that men, and
learned men too, can reject that which has all evi-
dence in its favor, and believe that which, has no
evidence at all to support it? A man who is seriously
inquiring after truth, can never fall into follies like
these; and as to the man who does not in simplicity
love the truth, who investigates for the purpose of

56 OBJECTIONS TO THE PENTATEUCH.

finding something to establish a favorite theory, or
studies for the pleasure of forming ingenious conjec-
tures, of such it is generally true that much learning
makes them mad, and the more learning they have, the
more mad they become.

But what are the objections against the authorship
of Moses, which have led men to adopt such a vari-
ety of conjectures, to escape from the admission of
this simple fact? This is our next topic.

II. OBJECTIONS TO THE AUTHORSHIP OF MOSES.

First objection. — The books contain some pas-
sages of w^hich Moses w^as not the writer.

This is true. Who ever wrote a historical work
extending through a period of twenty-five hundred
years, without making some quotations from preced-
ing writings? And does the existence of such quo-
tations, accurately and literally made, diminish the
value of the history or increase it?

In Num. xxiii. xxiv. there are some highly finished
and magnificent passages of poetry ascribed to Ba-
laam. If the book be worthy of credit, these are not
the compositions of Moses, but of Balaam; for Moses
does not profess to write fiction but true history..
Num. xxi. vs. 14, 15, there is a quotation from an
ancient writing called the book of Jehovah^s tears;
vs. 17, 18, a quotation from a joyous song of the
Israelites, with which they celebrated the unexpect-
ed discovery of a well in the Arabian desert; and vs.
27-30, an extract from an ancient war-song of the
Amorites on occasion of their victory over Moab.
We suppose all these passages to be what they pro-

OBJECTIONS TO THE PENTATEUCH. 57

fess to be, namely, quotations, and not compositions
by Moses; for if Moses did write them they must
be fictitious, and not true, as they profess to be.

Again, Gen. xlix. we have the dying address of
Jacob to his sons, apparently word for word as he
uttered it; and Gen. xxvii. the blessing of Isaac on
his two sons. So, several of the first chapters of Gen-
esis, if we may judge from their style and structure,
and the several distinct titles by which the different
narratives are introduced, are not original composi-
tions by Moses, but selections made by him, under
divine direction, from very ancient documents, in his
possession, by different writers at different periods.
Perhaps the same may be said of Gen. xxxvi. which
gives an account of the posterity of Esau; and of
Gen. xxxviii. which relates the crimes and follies of
Judah and his sons.

For proof of the compilation of the early parts of
Genesis from several different and very ancient doc-
uments, I refer my readers to a single fact, which is
very obvious in the English translation, and still more
so in the Hebrew original; I mean the different
names of the Supreme Being, which occur in the
different documents. In Gen. i-ii. 3 (which is one
piece of composition, the second chapter really be-
ginning with what is put as the fourth verse, as the
title, these are the generations^ shows) the name of
the Supreme Being is uniformly God, cri'',''? (aUohim).
In the second document, including ii. 4-iii. the name
of the Supreme Being is uniformly Jehovah God,
a^rlSx nin""^ {y\hovah aHohim) ; in the third document,
including chapter iv. it is Jehovah only; in chapter v.

56 OBJECTIONS TO THE PENTATEUCH.

God only, except in vs. 29, where a quotation is
made, and the name Jehovah used; in vi-ix. God
and Jehovah are used promiscuously, except once
(ix. 26), where a quotation is made and the name
Jehovah God is used; in xii. xiii. Jehovah only; in
xiv. in connection with Melchizedeck there is a name
of the Supreme Being altogether peculiar, that is,
God Most High, jV^J^ ^8< {ael elyon)^ except v. 22,
where Abraham prefixes to this appellation the name
Jehovah. It is inconceivable that all this should be
the result of mere accident. The changes of the
name correspond exactly to the changes in the nar-
rative and the titles of the several pieces ; and each
document uniformly preserves the same name, ex-
cept when a quotation is made, and then, as the fidel-
ity of history requires, the name used by the person
introduced as speaking, is inserted. It is perhaps
impossible to decide definitely respecting the amount
of quotation of this kind, but in the first fifteen chap-
ters of Genesis it seems to be very considerable.

Now do all these accurate quotations impair the
credit of the Mosaic books, or increase it? Is Mar-
shall's Life of Washington to be regarded as unworthy
of credit, because it contains copious extracts from
Washington's correspondence, and literal quotations
from important public documents? Is not its value
greatly enhanced by this circumstance? Is not the
clear, direct style of judge Marshall as obvious
throughout the work, as it would have been if it had
not contained a single quotation? The objection is
altogether futile. In the common editions of the bible
the Pentateuch occupies about one hundred and fifty

OBJECTIONS TO THE PENTATEUCH. 59

pages, of which perhaps ten may be taken up with
quotations. This surely is no very large proportion for
a historical work extending through so long a period.
Second objection. — The books contain some
passages which could not have been written till after
the death of Moses.

This also is true. Deut. xxxiv. relates the death
and burial of Moses, in the style of plain, sober his-
tory, and not in that of prophecy. Again, Gen.
xxxvi. 31-39, there is a continuation of the catalogue
of Edomitish chiefs, supplementary to the original
catalogue left by Moses.

But the strength of this objection, by those who
offer it, is made to rest principally on the change of
obsolete for well known names of places. For ex-
ample. Gen. xiv. 14, it is said that Abraham pursued
the eastern chieftains to Dan; but in Joshua xix. 47
and Judges xviii. 29, we find that this city was then
called Leshem or Laish, and that it was not called
Dan till some centuries after the death of Abraham,
when it was taken by the Israelitish tribe of that
name, and made their chief city. So in Gen. xiii. 1 8,
Hebron is mentioned; but we find by Joshua xiv. 15
and XV. 1 3, that the original name of the city was
Kirjath-Arba, and that it did not receive the name
of Hebron till several centuries after the time of
Abraham. So in regard to Bethel, Gen. xiii. 3,
originally called Luz, Gen. xxviii. 19.

There are some other passages of the same kind,
but those enumerated are sufficient to set forth the
objection in all its force. The facts are admitted,
the inference denied.

60 OBJECTIONS TO THE PENTATEUCH.

It is a necessary part of the economy of revela-
tion, that subsequent sacred writers should be author-
ized to give such additional notices and make such
verbal changes in the preceding books, as might be
necessary to render them intelligible to succeeding
generations. Examine the passages objected to. It
is important as matter of history, to know something
of the death and burial of Moses, and these facts are
inserted in their proper place. The sacred writers
regarded their writings as public property, and
were not at all concerned to claim individual credit
for every word they wrote. In modern books, these
necessary additional notices are put in by way
of note or appendix; but the ancients knew nothing
of these arts of modern authorship, and whatever
was necessary for them to write, must be written in
the text. Interpolation is something added aside
from the author's purpose; and is a very different
thing from a note in explanation or illustration of a
writer, added by an authorized hand, in exact and
ascertained coincidence with the author's design.

Examine next the change of names. Observe,
the Hebrew name is substituted for the pagan — the
sacred for the profane. Where a place was gene-
rally known by both names, both are inserted:
see Gen. xiv. 2, 7, 8; Deut. iii. 9; iv. 48, and
numerous other passages. Where the pagan or
ancient name had become entirely obsolete, in the
process of transcription the obsolete name was
either entirely omitted or mentioned only once or
twice, for the purpose of explanation, as in the cases
of Laish, Kirjath-Arba, and Luz, above referred to.

OBJECTIONS TO THE PENTATEUCH. 61

Now is not this just as it should be, if it were intend-
ed that the bible should be intelligible? The thing
wanted is, to direct the mind of the reader to the
right place; and how is this to be done, but by call-
ing the place by the name by which it is known to
the reader? Take the example of the principal com-
mercial city of the west. It was once called Losan-
tiville. But in order to tell the truth about any
transaction that occurred here at that time, must
we say that it took place in Losantiville, and as we
avoid a falsehood, avoid saying that it took place in
Cincinnati? And if, at some future time, it should
be very generally unknown that this city ever bore
the first name, and it should become necessary to
'-epublish a work relating to the city, originally writ-
ten when it bore that name, would it not be neces-
sary to add the name Cincinnati to that of Losanti-
ville, if we would have the readers understand what
place is meant? Take another example. The chief
city of New England was once called Shawmut,
then Trimountain, finally, Boston. Now, in order
to tell the truth, must we say, that Mr. Blacks tone
came to Shawmut, and Mr. Cotton came to Tri-
mountain, and Sir Harry Vane came to Boston? Or,
in order to be understood, must we not say, that all
these men came to Boston? And in republishing an
ancient work, must not the obsolete name be ex-
plained by the well known name? This is all that
is done in the bible; only the name is explained in
the text, instead of a marginal note — a refinement
in the art of bookmaking then entirely unknown.

6

6'2 OBJECTIONS TO THE PENTATEUCH,

The bible regards only important, essential truths^
and has no concern for the unimportant trifles which
pertain merely to the etiquette of authorship.

Something also has been attempted in the way of
objection from the expression, and the Canaanite
was then in the land (Gen. xii. 6; xiii. 7, and other
places); as though this expression implied, that at
the time when these books were written, the Ca-
naanites must have been already expelled. Nothing
can be more empty and foolish than this objection.
The Canaanites originally dwelt on the coasts of
the Persian gulf (Eichhorn's Introduction, vol. iii. p.
169), and had no inheritance in the land of Canaan,
which God had given to Abraham, but into which
they had emigrated, or (to use a phrase well under-
stood in our new settlements) in which they were
squatters. It is the intention of the sacred writer
simply to show, that when Abraham went to take
possession of the land which God had given him, the
Canaanite was already there before him.

The proper meaning of the Hebrew word TX {aaz\
(in these passages translated then)^ is at that time,
(See Gesenius's Hebrew Lexicon, Leipsic, 1833, on
the word).

The objection derived from what is said of the
name Jehovah (Exod. vi. 2-7) is equally groundless.
It is the meaning of the word — the self -existent^ the
unchangeable — that is here brought to view (Com-
pare Exod. iii. 14). In his dealings with the patri-
arcns, God had shown himself to be the Almighty ;
in his dealings with their descendants ne wouia snow
himself to be the self-existent and unchangeable.

OBJECTIONS TO THE PENTATEUCH. 63

The same objection is insisted upon by reference
to such passages as Deut. iv. 46, 47, 49. It is alleg-
ed that these passages should be translated beyond
Jordan, or on the other side of Jordan, and not on this
side Jordan, SiS in our translation; and that, as these
passages refer to places east of Jordan, and as Moses
must have written on the east side of the river, and
not on the w^est, these passages could not have been
written by him.

Admitting the statement to be true, the same
answer that is given in respect to the change of
names, is applicable also here. But the objection is
groundless in point of fact. The Hebrew word *i?J^
(aeber), which the objection assumes to be restricted
to the meaning beyond or on the other side, has, by
the custom of Hebrew speech, a more extensive and
indefinite application; and which side of the river is
intended, is designated by adding to the word "i^j;,
the word nnnm (mizrachah) eastward, or na'i;;n (maa-
rabah) westward. For proof of this, examine Josh,
v. 1; ix. 1; xii. 7; 1 Chron. xxvi. 3, where the same
word '15J'* is used in reference to the western side of
Jordan; so that if the use of this word in Deuter-
onomy proves that the Pentateuch was written
after the Israelites dwelt on the western side of Jor-
dan, the use of the same word' in the other pas-
sages quoted, must prove that the books of Joshua
and Chronicles were written while they dwelt on
the east side of Jordan, which is contrary to well
known and universally acknowledged fact.

The same principles apply to all other objections

64 OBJECTIONS TO THE PENTATEUCH.

of this class, and it is unnecessary to specify par-
ticulars any further.

Before we leave this objection, it will be interest-
ing to consider one fact in reference to the Penta-
teuch, which, to a mind accustomed to investigations
of this sort, affords indubitable evidence of its au-
thenticity. It is this, that the narrative throughout
keeps pace exactly with the natural progress of
society, and in the minutest circumstances accu-
rately corresponds to the manners appropriate to
each period and place. This is one of the most
difficult achievements in works of fiction; and the
most labored and ingenious attempts at literary
forgery have been detected by slight inaccuracies of
this kind, of which the frauds of Chatterton and
Ireland are memorable examples. Much more diffi-
cult, and indeed utterly impossible would it have been
to preserve this congruity in a fictitious work running
through so long a period, and embracing such a
variety of manners, as come within the scope of
the Pentateuch; especially at that early age, before
writing had begun to be an art, and when there were
no authors whose ingenuity was sharpened by the ne-
cessity of earning their bread by the labors of the
pen. All ancient attempts at forgery are, in this
respect, awkward and incongruous in the extreme,
and open to immediate detection.

Examine a few passages of Genesis in reference
to this point. Abraham comes from the east, a rich
and powerful man, but a simple herdsman. When
guests arrive, he runs himself to the herd and selects
a calf for their repast, while his wife prepares their

OBJECTIONS TO THE PENTATEUCH. 65

bread; and he sets milk before them instead of wine,
although the grape had then long been cultivated
(Gen. xviii. compare xiv. 18). Isaac, made rich by
the inheritance of his father, and luxurious by inter-
course with the Phoenician merchants, drinks wine
and has a taste for venison prepared with careful
cookery (Gen. xxvii). Jacob, instead of advancing
in refinement and luxury, driven from his father's
house and seeking a shelter among the eastern no-
madic relatives of his mother, was brought back to
the pastoral simplicity of his grandfather Abraham.
He was a plain man dwelling in tents (Gen. xxv. 27).
Esau, on the contrary, who remained in Canaan on
the grounds of his father, meets his pastoral brother
with the retinue of a prince (Gen. xxxiii). Trace also
the gradual rise and increase of commercial inter-
course (Gen. xxxvii. 25; xli. 57; xlii. 27). In Abra-
ham's time there were no such facilities for trade;
and when a famine arose in Canaan, he was obliged
to take his family into Egypt to find sustenance for
them (Gen. xii. 10). Observe again the primitive
simplicity of the regal office, and the gradual develop-
ment of a formal and luxurious court in Egypt
(Gen. xiv. xii. 14, 15; xliii. 32; xlvii. 7; xl. 1. Com-
pare xxi. 22; xxvi. 26). In Mesopotamia, we find
Jacob receiving compensation, not in silver and
gold, but in flocks and herds and servants (Gen. xxx.
xxxi); but in Canaan, in the neighborhood of the
Phoenician merchants, we see money told by weight
even in Abraham's time (Gen. xxiii. 16); and in the
time of Jacob, coin is in circulation (Gen. xxxiii. 19).
So in the first part of Genesis we hear nothing of

66 OBJECTIONS TO THE PENTATEUCH.

horses and carriages; and they are first mentioned
when Joseph sends for his father to come to Egypt
(Gen. xlv. 19-27; xlvii. 17). This corresponds to
the historical fact, tliat the Egyptians were the first
people who trained horses for domestic use (Compare
1 Kings X. 28, 29). Thus in all the little circum-
stances, by which literary forgeries are always de-
tected, we find the Pentateuch minutely accurate,
and giving the most unequivocal proof of authenti-
city. (See Eichhorn's Introduction to the Old Tes-
tament, vol. iii. p. 151-155, in German).

Third objection. — The language and style of the
Pentateuch too nearly resemble that of the later
writers, to admit the supposition that it was written
in the age of Moses.

This allegation is denied entirely. There is a
striking difference in language and style, both gene-
rally and in the use of single words. The differences
of orthography are very great, and of the same kind
with those we observe in English books written at
different periods. There are also in the Pentateuch
many words, which are obsolete in the subsequent
books, either not used at all, or used in an entirely
different sense. Professor Jahn of Vienna has enu-
merated more than two hundred words of this kind,
exclusive of those which occur but once, and of
those which there might be no occasion to use in
the subsequent books. For example, in the Penta-
teuch we have the words ^VJ (naar) and «^n (hua)
instead nv: (no' rah) and «'n (Jiia) damsel and she-^
the third person plural feminine of verbs is written
without final n in the Pentateuch, but with it in all

OB^TECTIONS TO THE PENTATEUCH. 67

the other books, as,p^ni^ {tihyena) for (nr^riir) tihyenah)^
|K3r^ (tabona) for nJK^n (tabonah)^ and many other
instances of the same kind. The month called T:ii<
(aabib) in the Pentateuch, is called p'J {nisan) in the
later books. So the word nan (dagah) in the sense to
multiply, ^3I (zabad) in the sense to give, *iot (zakur)
meaning male, &c. There is the same difference in
the use of whole phrases. For example, in the Pen-
tateuch; to die is to be gathered to one's people (Gen.
xlix. 29, 33), in the other books, it is to be gathered
to one's fathers (Judges ii. 10; 2 Chron. xxiv. 28), or
to be gathered to one's sepulchres (2 Kings xxii. 20.)

It is also worthy of notice, in reference to this
objection, that all the foreign words, which occur in
the Pentateuch, are Egyptian, while the foreign
words of the other books are Aramean. Now, the
Arabians spoke essentially the same language as the
Hebrews, and allowing these books to have been
written by Moses, the Egyptian was the only foreign
language from which words could have been bor-
rowed; but on the supposition that the Pentateuch
was written after the Hebrews were settled in Ca-
naan, the foreign words must have been borrowed
mostly from their Syrian neighbors, as is the fact in
reference to all the books written after that period.
For examples of Egyptian words in the Pentateuch,
see ^"13 J< {abraek, Gen. xli. 43) rendered in the En-
glish translation, bow the knee, ^n« {aachu, Gen. xli. 2)
translated meadow, tyt^ (shaesh, Exod. xxvi. 1), trans-
lated Jlne linen, ix' («/'or, Exod. i. 22), translated
the river; and several other words of the same kind.
(Compare Rosenmueller's Scholia on the Old Testa-

68 OBJECTIONS TO THE PENTATEUCH.

ment, vol. i. p. 30-32; and Jahn's Introduction to
the Old Testament, translated by professor Turner,
p. 177, 179).

Again, most of the changes which take place in
the orthography of a language, occur in the vowels
rather than in the consonants, and as the Hebrew
bible was originally written mostly without vowels —
these being added by the Massorites after the He-
brew had ceased to be a spoken language — there must
of course be much fewer archaisms than occur in
books where the vowels are all written. So the
Koran, being originally written without vowels, is
as well understood now as it was in the time of
Mohammed; but if the text were to be read with the
pronunciation of the Mohammedan period, proba-
bly many words would appear obsolete. The same
is true, to a great extent, of the sacred books of the
Syrian church.

Again, changes in language are produced by
change of circumstances, advancement in the arts
and sciences, intercourse with foreigners, multiplici-
ty of writers, &c. Now as the Hebrews were a
simple, secluded, agricultural people, avoiding inter-
course with foreigners, and religiously attached to
every thing inherited from their ancestors, there was
very little opportunity for change of language, till
the time of the Babylonian captivity, when it under-
went a very great change.

Finally, literal archaisms were gradually smoothed
away in the process of transcription; as the orthogra-
phy of our English bibles has been several times
changed, since its first publication under king James,

OBJECTIONS TO THE PENTATEUCH. 69

in order to make it conformable to the different
modes of orthography, which have prevailed at differ-
ent periods since that time. This is very evident
to any one who examines the vowel points of the
Hebrew text in reference to the consonants with
which they are placed.

Fourth objection. — The inequalities of style and
fragmentary structure of the whole work, show that
it could not have been the composition of one man
in one period, but of several men at different periods.

In reply to this objection, we say —

1. It has already been shown, that though Moses
was the writer of these books, he has inserted in his
work, literal and somewhat copious extracts from
documents still more ancient; so that there are in
fact, in this work of Moses, fragments of the writings
of several men, at different periods. (See p. 56-58).

2. It has been shown, that the circumstances un-
der which Moses wrote, necessarily led to those ine-
qualities of style, and the fragmentary structure
stated in the objection; and that if the fact on which
the objection is founded, did not exist, it would be a
very strong presumptive argument against the au-
thorship of Moses. (See p. 42).

3. The contents of the books are various, and
therefore, the style and structure ought to vary
to suit the constant variety of subject.

In the books of Moses, we have plain narrative,
sprightly dialogue, impassioned eloquence, the lyric
ode, the didactic poem, legal enactments, and every
variety of composition known to the ancients; and
written, too, under every variety of circumstance,

70 OBJECTIONS TO THE PENTATEUCH.

from the vigor of manhood, and the pressure of care
and numerous engagements, to extreme old age and
comparative ease. What man, in his senses, would
expect Moses to v^^rite all his compositions in the
same style?

All multifarious M^riters, who write with skill, are
unequal in their style. Examine the different compo-
sitions of Edmund Burke or Sir Walter Scott, and
you will find as great inequalities of style as you can
find in the books of Moses. A forgery w^ould be
altogether likely to preserve greater uniformity; for,
as has been already remarked, all forged revelations,
from the Koran downward, are of a structure com-
paratively even and uniform.

4. The general unity of design manifest in the
books of Moses has already been alluded to.

III. SUMMARY VIEW OF THE ARGUMENT.

In favor, then, of the authenticity of the five books
of Moses, we have

1. The unanimous and uncontradicted testimony
of antiquity:

2. With this all the internal evidence exactly cor-
responds, as has been exemplified in a variety of
particulars :

3. The declarations of the books themselves could
have been made by none but Moses:

4. The whole series of Hebrew literature rests on
these books, and demonstrates that they emanated
from Moses:

5. The contrary hypotheses are self-contradictory,
and entirely without foundation:

OBJECTIONS TO THE PENTATEUCH. 71

6. All the objections to the authenticity of these
books are susceptible of an easy and satisfactory
answer,

IV. CONCLUSION.

In conclusion, I request the reader seriously to
ponder the following plain questions:

1. Why is it that men demand evidence in regard
to the bible, which they never think of demanding
in reference to any thing else; and which, in relation
to all other subjects, they would pronounce at once
to be unreasonable?

2. Why do they allow weight to objections in
reference to the bible, to which they would allow no
weight whatever in reference to any thing else;
and which, in relation to all other subjects, they
would pronounce at once to be absurd?

This is a practical matter of the deepest interest,
and every man must decide and act on his own
responsibility.

CHAPTER FIFTH.

ORIGIN OF ALPHABETIC WRITING.

I. PROGRESS OF THE ANCIENTS IN THE ARTS AND SCIENCES.

It has been objected to the antiquity claimed for
the earlier books of the Old Testament, and more
particularly to the extremely ancient written docu-
ments referred to and quoted in these books, that at
so very early a period, men must have been in an
almost infantile condition, and that it is quite impro-
bable that they had then discovered sufficient mate-
rials of vi^riting, or invented the alphabet. Hence it
is inferred that the books must have been compiled at
a period comparatively recent, and being but the
relics of oraltraditions, propagated through thousands
of years, can at best be entitled to but little credit.
Such an opinion can proceed only from that igno-
rance and undervaluing of antiquity, which is almost
a characteristic of the present age. Many seem to
think that men have never known much of any thing,
until very lately.

I would not elevate the ancients at the expense of
the moderns, for I know and rejoice in the fact, that
society has been continually advancing, though
slowly and not in a direct line, but in progressive

ALPHABETIC WRITING. 73

circles, retrograding in parts, while it advances on
the whole. In many things we are in advance of
the ancients; but in some things we are quite as far
behind them. It is the extreme of folly and vanity
to imagine that the human race has slept in a condi-
tion of half idiocy till the commencement of the eigh-
teenth or nineteenth century — and that men have
never put forth strong and successful effort till our
own times. A little attention to ancient history
would soon dissipate all such notions.

As early as the sixth generation from Adam, we
find the arts of working the metals, and of manufac-
turing both wind and stringed instruments of music,
introduced by Jubal and Tubal-cain, (Gen. iv. 21,
22, the words ' organ' and ' harp', as in our version,
do not express the full meaning of the Hebrew
words 3J,=ii^ (augab) and "^lii^ {kinn.or)\ which are gene-
ral, signifying all kinds of wind and stringed instru-
ments). This early invention of musical instruments
is thus poetically celebrated by Dry den :

'When Jubal struck the chorded shell,

His listening brethren stood around, »

And wondering, on their faces fell,

To worship that celestial sound :

Less than a god they thought, there could not dwell

Within the hollow of that shell,

Which spoke so sweetly and so well.'

Could arts like these exist without producing a
considerable degree of civilization and refinement?
Or rather, do they not presuppose this, as essentially
requisite to their own existence?

74 ALPHABETIC WRITING.

The remains of art which still exist; the immense
piles of ruins, and the numerous canals on the plains
of Babylon; the exquisite specimens of architectural
taste, and of statuary and painting, which are found
within the boundaries of the ancient Persian and Me-
dian empire, particularly at Persepolis; the magnifi-
cent temples, collosal statues and everlasting pyramids
of ancient Egypt, so massively and yet so nicely
constructed, that the most skilful engineers of the
French army could devise no way in w^hich it would
be possible for them to raise such enormous masses
of rock, or fit them together when raised: these, and
many other remains, some of which are known to
be at least as ancient as the time of Moses, and
which, after the lapse of so many ages, and the ruth-
less attacks of so many barbarians, and the despoil-
ing hands of so many pilferers, still retain enough of
their ancient magnificence to strike with astonish-
ment and admiration, even those whose eyes have
been long accustomed to all that Greek and Roman
and modern art could achieve, — these things, I say,
a];e sufficient indications that the ancients were not
the mere children, which some have supposed them.
Since the time of Alexander the Great, four immense
cities, each containing an average of at least half a mil-
lion of inhabitants, besides innumerable smaller cities,
villages, and caravansaries, have been built almost en-
tirely with the materials found among the ruins of
ancient Babylon, and 3^et these ruins still remain un-
exhausted. 'When we consider,' says Sir Robert
Ker Porter (Travels, vol. ii. p. 337, 338), 'that so
many centuries have passed, since Babylon became a

ALPHABETIC WRITING. Td-

deserted habitation, and that it yet lay in the neighbor-
hood of populous nations, our surprise ought to be, not
that we find so little of its remains, but that we see
so much. From her fallen towers have arisen, not
only all the present cities in her vicinity, but others,
which, like herself, are long ago gone down into the
dust. Since the days of Alexander, we find four
capitals at least built out of her remains: Selucia by
the Greeks, Ctesiphon by the Parthians, Al Maidan
by the Persians, Kufa by the Caliphs; with towns,
villages, and caravansaries without number.'

'That the fragments of one city should travel so
far, to build or repair the breaches of another, on
the first view of the subject, appeared unlikely to
myself; but on traversing the country between the
approximating shores of the two rivers, and observ-
ing all the facilities for water-carriage from one side
to the other, I could no longer be incredulous of
what had been told me; particularly when scarce a
day passed without my seeing people digging the
mounds of Babylon for bricks, which they carried
to the verge of the Euphrates, and thence conveyed
in boats to wherever they might be w^anted.'

Besides Sir R. K. Porter's splendid work, I would
refer the reader, who wishes for confirmation and
more than confirmation of all that has been said, to
the Memoirs on the Ruins of Babylon by Claudius
James Rich, British Consul at Bagdat; and for
Egypt, to Belzoni's travels, the researches of the
French philosophers, and the judicious compilation,
entitled the Modern Traveler, published in Londoa
and republished in Boston.

76 ALPHABETIC WRITING.

After the statement of these facts, which no one
who has any competent knowledge of the subject,
will pretend to controvert, I hope my readers will
not be incredulous, if some of the discussions on which
we are about to enter, should imply a state of ad-
vancement in civilization among the ancients, con-
siderably beyond that, for which some moderns have
been accustomed to give them credit.

II. MOST ANCIENT MATERIALS OF WRITING.

There must have been some convenient and por-
table material of writing known a considerable pe-
riod before the most ancient parts of the Old Testa-
ment were written. This is essential to the forma-
tion of the plain historical style, in which these
books are composed; for such a style cannot be form-
ed without considerable practice, and practice is im-
possible without a convenient and portable material.
Previous to the discovery of such a material, literary
effort is confined to the brief genealogy, the tradi-
tionary song, and the moral aphorism. Stone is the
first material mentioned, on which letters must have
been engraved (Exod. xxiv. 12-18; xviii; Josh. viii.
32). This perhaps might have been the first material
used; but it is obviously too unwieldy and inflexible
for books, and books are mentioned as having been
well known before (Ex. xvii. 14; Job xix. 23). Stone
could be used only for short inscriptions, genealo-
gies, and statutes, where the durability and perma-
nency of the material were matters of great impor-
tance. The most important Roman laws, for this
reason, were engraved upon brazen plates. So, for

ALPHABETie WRITING, 77

this reason, Moses engraved the ten commandments
on stone.

Lead occurs very early as a material of writing,
and was in many respects better than stone (Job
xix. 24). The leaden sheets v^ere written upon and
then fastened to stone. Thus, subsequently, Pausa-
nias says, he saw in Boeotia, the works of Hesiod en-
graved upon lead (Pau. ix. 31). At Babylon square
pieces of clay were worked with letters and then
baked into tiles. Pieces of wood smoothed, with
a flat surface, were used for the same purpose
(Ezek. xxxvii. 16; Luke i. 63; 'writing table,' the
passage in Luke is translated, and it means wood
prepared to be written upon). Herodotus mentions
the skins of goats and sheep roughly dressed, as
being in use among the lonians (v. 58). Pliny
informs us that papyrus came into use previous to
the Trojan war, 1184 before Christ, (Nat. Hist, xii;
21-29). Parchment properly prepared was not
known until about 200 B. C.

We know that the Hebrews, in the time of Moses,
possessed the art of dressing skins, and even of col-
oring them, (as well as of ornamental working in
wood, metal, and precious stones: Exod. xxxi. and
xxxvi); but we know not that they had the art of
making parchment for purposes of writing. . We
know that the Egyptians very extensively made use
of cotton cloth, prepared for this purpose. Libros
linteos are also mentioned by Livy as having been used
at Rome. The bandages and envelopes of the
Egyptian mummies, so many of which have recently
been examined, are composed of coarse cottoik

7*

78 ALPHABETIC WRITING.

cloth, and many of them are entirely covered with
writing.

Moses was from Egypt, and was well acquainted
with all the Egyptian arts, and this prepared cloth
would furnish him with a material portable, cheap,
endurable, and in all respects convenient; so that
in his time, and long before, there would have been
no trouble in finding materials for books. Ink is
mentioned by Jeremiah, xxxvi. 18. The pen is men-
tioned as a graving tool, Jer. xvii. 1. The pen also
was sometimes a brushy like our paint brushes, or a
reed split at one end, such as is now used among
some of the oriental nations. (Compare Eichhorn's
Introduction to the Old Testament, vol. iii. p. 10;
vol. i. p. 183, 184; and Jahn's Biblical Archaeology,
translated by professor Upham, Sect. 87).

III. IMPORTAKCE OF ALPHABETIC WRITING.

The invention of alphabetic writing, so far as the
development of mind is concerned, is one of the
most important that has ever occurred. Without it,
thought could not be preserved; each succeeding age
would lose nearly all the benefit of the effort and ex-
perience of the preceding; the human race would
remain in a condition of perpetual childhood, and
every little section of the world be cut off from
intellectual communication with every other section.
By this invention, mind is connected with mind to
the remotest ages and most distant climes; thoughts,
inventions, improvements flow into each other, give
risfe to new ones, and become the common property
of the world.

ALPHABETIC WRITING* 7^

Useful as this invention is, and essential as it is
to the intellectual growth of man, and familiar as we
have become with it, it is yet a most astonishing one.
Language is remote from thought, and writing is
equally remote from language; and yet, by familiar-
ity of association, writing suggests thought as readily
and as completely as if it had a natural and intimate
connection with it. We express a thought by an
arbitrary sound, which has no natural connection
with it whatever; this arbitrary sound again is re-
presented to the eye by an arbitrary figure, which
has no more natural connection with the sound than
the sound, has with the thought; and yet so familiar
have our minds become with this arbitrary, circui-
tous, and complex mode of representing thought,
and so necessary is it to us, that in reading we are
entirely insensible to the long processes of associa-
tion, abstraction, and induction, which are going on
within. The mind seems to take the thought as
directly as if the channel of communication were
necessarily inherent in the nature of the subjects*
That both the words of speech and the characters of
writing are in themselves entirely arbitrary, is mani-
fest from the fact, that an endless variety of diffe-
rent sounds and different signs is used by different
nations, with equal convenience to express the same
thing. The origin of spoken language, and of its
essential diversities, exclusive of dialectic varieties^
seems to be justly referred to the direct interposi-
tion of the Creator (Compare Gen. ii. 19, 20 and xi*
1-9). At least, we may ask, what theory of the
origin of languages and its great diversities, (such

80

ALPHABETIC WRITING.

for example as that which exists between the Chi-
nese and the English), more rational than that of the
bible, has ever yet been proposed?

IV. ALL ALPHABETS FROM ONE SOURCE.

In examining the history of alphabetic writing,
the first thing that strikes us is, that the alphabets of
all cultivated languages, so far as they have been
investigated, seem to have been derived from a com-
mon source, and the invention appears to have been
made but once. Those alphabets which at first ap-
peared to make an exception to the rule, on closer
examination and more familiar acquaintance, are
found to confirm it. In illustration of this fact, com-
pare the names and the ancient arrangement of the
letters in the following alphabets.

Hebrew,

Syrian.

Greek.

Arabic.

A

Aleph

Olaph

Alpha

Eliph

B

Beth

Beth

Beta

Be

G

Gimel

Gomal

Gamma

Gim

D

Daleth

Dolath

Delta

Dal

*

***

***

***

***

K

Kaph

Kuph

Kappa

Koph

L

Lamed

Lomad

Lambda

Lam

M

Mem

Mim

Mu

Mim

N

Nun

Nun

Nu

Nun.

The same comparison might be carried through
all the letters of the alphabet with a like result, but
the above will answer all the purpose of illustration-
The names in the above table are arranged in the
order of antiquity, the Hebrew being the most
ancient, and the Arabic the most modern..

ALPHABETIC WRITING. 81

V. ALPHABETIC WRITING OF SHEMITISH ORIGIN.

The original source of alphabetic writing is to be
found among the descendants of Shem, in the great
Asiatic valley watered by the Tigris and the Eu-
phrates (Gen. X. 21-25).

In proof of this we observe, that the names of the
letters are Shemitish, and in the old Shemitish lan-
guages they are the names of the things which the
figures of the letters represented, while in other
languages they are mere technical terms.

VI. PROCESS OF FORMING THE ORIGINAL ALPHABET.

The process of forming the alphabet seems origin-
ally to have been this: To represent a sound, the
name of some visible object was taken, the first
sound in which was the sound desired; and the pic-
ture of that object was the letter for that sound.
For example, I wish to represent the sound D; I look
around for some object, the name of which begins
with that sound. I select door^ the name of which
thus becomes the name of the sound D, and the
picture of which becomes the letter for that sound.
This is the way in which the letter D was actually
formed; this is the meaning of the old Shemitish
word daletli^ and the original figure to represent this
sound was a rude picture of an ancient door.

To illustrate this point more fully, the annexed
engraving gives the form of several letters from the
most ancient alphabets known.

as

ALPHABETIC WRITING.

n

11.

Hi

IV.

V.

n

VI.

H

VII.

I

^

^

1

1

T

V

I

4

z.

t

"?

A

L

1

«V

T

Y

n

A

D

5)

9

A

^

i

B

\

<.

T

Z

r

X

A

n

T

(}^^

r

><

>«

A

0

n

©

'■A

^

A

«(

I

Y

sv

w

V

2t>

X

S

ALPHABETIC WRITING. 83

Column I. is the old Babylonian alphabet, found on
tiles among the ruins of Babylon, of which but six
letters have as yet been ascertained. This is proba-
bly the oldest alphabet, of which any traces remain.

Column II. is from the old Phenician alphabet, found
in. inscriptions upon rocks in the parts of western
Asia and northern Africa, inhabited by the Phenician
merchants of remote antiquity. This we have toler-
ably complete.

Column III. is the ancient Hebrew, preserved on the
old Jewish coins, particularly those which were
struck in the time of the Maccabean princes. The
sacred letter of the Samaritans is essentially the
same with this.

Column IV. is the old Syrian alphabet, found in
inscriptions among the ruins of ancient Syrian cities.

Column V. is the Chaldee, or modern Hebrew letter;
the character in which the Chaldee and Hebrew lan-
guages are now written and printed.

. Column VI. is the ancient Greek letter, consisting
entirely of square capitals; as all ancient alphabets
consist only of capitals, the small letter being an
invention but little anterior to that of the art of
printing.

Column VII. is the Roman letter, so far as it differs
from the Greek. Where no letter is found in column
vii., the Roman letter is precisely like the Greek.

An examination of the letters represented in this
engraving, will illustrate and confirm the remark I
have made respecting the original process of forming
the alphabet. The old Shemitish name of the first

84 ALPHABETIC WRITING.

letter on the plate is Heth, which means a fence or
enclosure^ and is the original source of our aspirate ff.
Trace this letter through the first line, and observe
how clearly, in all its changes through various lan-
guages, it still preserves the outlines of its original
form and the evidences of its origin. In the Baby-
lonian alphabet, it is an exact enclosure of a triangu-
lar form; in the Phenician, an enclosure with an
opening at each end; in the old Hebrew, a close
enclosure; in the Syrian and Chaldee, an enclosure
open at one end; the Greek and Roman is formed
from the Syrian, by dropping down the horizontal
stroke to the middle of the two perpendiculars.

The second letter is Vauv (the original of our V),
a name, which in the Shemitish languages means a
hook^ or nail^ and particularly a tenter-hook, such as is
driven into a wall or post, for the purpose of hang-
ing things upon it. Trace, now, the different figures
of this letter through the several ancient alphabets,
and you will find them all derived from the same
source, and corresponding in their outlines to the
original signification of the name. The Babylonian
Vauv is a complete hook; the Phenician, a tenter-
hook; the old Hebrew, a nail a little bent at the
head; the Syrian and Chaldee, tenter-hooks; the
Greek and Roman plainly derived from the Pheni-
cian, by making the acute angle the bottom of the
letter, instead of the right-hand side.

In regard to the other letters, the reader can easily
make the comparison for himself; and I need only
indicate the names and their signification.

ALPHABETIC WRITING. 85

Letter 3d is L, name Lamed, signification Ox-goad.

4th D, Daleth, Door.

5th B, Beth, House.

6th Z, Zain, Sword or weapon.

7th T, Tauv, Cross.

8th A, Aleph, Ox or horned animal.

9th Th(hard), Theth, Serpent.

10th Y or J, YodorJod, Hand.

11th ShorS, Shin or Sin, Tooth.

The reader will observe, that the letters here are
not arranged in the order of the alphabet: that is
pointed out on a preceding page, where the names
of the letters are given (p. 80).

Probably no one of the alphabets here represented,
extremely ancient as they are, is the original one;
for no one of them, as is easily seen by the engraving,
gives the original figure of every letter; but this dis-
appears and reappears as you pass from one to the
other. Compare particularly the letter T, Cross, in
the Phenician, old Hebrew, Syrian, Chaldee, Greek
and Roman; and S, Tooth, in the Phenician, old He-
brew, Syrian and Chaldee.

We ought not to be surprised to find some of the
figures rather rude and imperfect representations of
the visible objects whose names they bear; for their
very rudeness is one of the indubitable marks of their
remote antiquity; and it is the gradual and long-
continued process of refinement which, in many
instances, has obliterated almost all traces of the
original figure.

86 ALPHABETIC WRITING.

VII. HISTORICAL TESTIMONY.

Tradition and historical testimony confirm the
views which we have given, namely, that alphabetic
writing was originally invented in the East, and that
all alphabets are derived from a common source.
The Orientals almost universally ascribed the inven-
tion of letters and sciences to Seth, Thoth, or Theuth,
whom the Europeans denominated Hermes or Mer-
cury. Compare Herbelot's Bibliotheque Orientale,
art. Scheith (in French); and Creuzer's Symbolik and
Mythology, vol. i. p. 321, and 363 f (in German).

The Greeks universally ascribe the introduction of
alphabetic writing among themselves, to Cadmus the
Phenician; a proper name which is nothing more
than the Greek form of the Shemitish word tDiP.
(kedem), and means an eastern man.

But we have also historical testimony, which is
explicit, and direct to the point, that alphabetic writ-
ing originated in the great Asiatic valley of the
Tigris and Euphrates.

Diodorus Siculus expresses the opinion, that 'the
Syrians are the inventers of letters, and the Pheni-
cians learning from them, communicated this knowl-
edge to the Greeks. These are they who sailed into
Europe with Cadmus, and on this account the Greeks
call the letters Phenician, though they say, that the
Phenicians did not invent them at the first, but only
changed the forms of the letters; and the most of
men now use this kind of writing'. (Book i. c. 2).

Pliny also observ^es, 'I suppose that the Assyrian
letters have always existed; but some say that they

ALPHABETIC WRITING. 87

were invented among the Egyptians by Mercury, as
Gellius; and others among the Syrians. Cadmus
brought them into Greece from Phenicia, sixteen in
number; the Pelasgi carried them into Latium.'
(Nat. Hist. vii. 56).

The earliest account of alphabetic writing among
profane historians, refers it to Babylon. Simplicius,
a Phrygian philosopher of the fifth century of the chris-
tian era, quoting Porphyry, states that Calisthenes,
the friend of Alexander, .found at Babylon on tiles
records of astronomical observations for one thou-
sand nine hundred and three years, that is, as far back
as 2234 B. C. in the eighty-ninth year of the life of
Abraham. This statement receives some confirma-
tion from modern astronomical calculations.

In the bible, books are first mentioned in Job (xix.
23) probably as early as 1700 before Christ; and in
Exodus (xvii. 14) about 1490 before Christ. The
first indication of alphabetic waiting is in the men-
tion of Judah's signet (Gen. xxxviii. 18), about 1730
before Christ. These are alluded to, not as things
new and strange, but as objects entirely familiar to
the people of that age. Writing and books were
well known to the Hebrew^s, long before this period;
for the art had been introduced at least as early as
the time of Abraham; and he was from the country
and nation in which the art originated (Gen. xi. 27,
28. XV. 7).

All the descendants of Arphaxad (Gen. x. 24) were
called Chaldeans; for Josephus says, 'Arphaxad
named the Arphaxadites, who are now called Chal-
deans,' (Antiq. I. 6: 4). To the same purpose we

88' ALPHABETIC WRITING.

read in the Apocryphal book of Judith, that when
the general of the Assyrian king demanded who the
Jews were, that dared ofier resistance to the power
of his master, ' then said Achior, the captain of all
the sons of Ammon, let my Lord now hear a word
from the mouth of thy servant, and I will declare
unto thee the truth concerning this people, which
dwelleth near thee and inhabiteth the hill countries:
and there shall no lie come out of the mouth of thy
servant. This people are descended of the Chal-
deans: and they sojourned heretofore in Mesopota-
mia, because they would not follow the gods of their
fathers, which were in the land of Chaldea. For
they left the way of their ancestors, and worshipped
the God of heaven, the God w^hom they knew, &c.
(Judith, v). The name Chaldean (or as it is alw^ays
in the Hebrew, Chasdim), which afterwards acquired
so extensive an application, is derived from Chesed
(Gen. xxii. 22), the son of Nahor, Abraham's brother.

The name Chaldea was originally applied to the
delightful and healthful region south of the Cardu-
chian mountains, and north of Mesopotamia and
Assyria (Ezek. i. 3); but the name was afterward
extended to the w^iole region of which Babylon was
the capital. The Chaldeans were universally known
as the heroes and sages of the ancient east; and in
the times of the later prophets, the term Chaldean
had become synonymous with that of sage or wise
man. (Hab. i. 6-11. Daniel, i-vi. Herodotus, i.
181-183).

The conclusion from the preceding investigation,
is, that alphabetic writing originated with the descend-

ALPHABETIC WRITING. 89

ants of Shem, and among the progenitors of the
Hebrew nation; that the art was known and exten-
sively practised, at least as early as the time of
Abraham, and that the first historical traces of its
existence are found among the Assyrians and Chal-
deans. We will now examine some of the opinions
of the ancients, which ascribe a different origin to
this most important art.

VII. ALPHABETIC WRITING NOT OF PHENICIAN ORIGIN.

It was a common opinion among the ancients, that
alphabetic writing was invented by the Phenicians.
Thus says the poet Lucan:

'Phenicians first, if ancient fame be true,

The sacred mystery of letters knew ;

They first by sound in various lines designed,

Expressed the meaning of the thinking mind ;

The power of words by figures rude conveyed,

And useful science everlasting made.

Then Memphis, ere the reedy leaf was known,

Engraved her precepts and her arts in stone,

While animals in various order placed.

The learned hieroglyphic column graced.'

(Pharsalia, III. 220 f. Howe's Translation).

Pliny also says, 'the nation of the Phenicians has
the greatest glory for the invention of letters, and
of the astronomical, naval, and warlike arts.' (Nat.
Hist. V. 12).

The source of this error is very easily detected.

The Phenicians of Canaan bordered on the Shemites,

and being the only commercial nation of antiquity,

they alone diffused among other nations the knowl-

8*

90 ALPHABETIC WRITrNG.

edge of the art, which they had learned from their
eastern neighbors. Herodotus himself seems clearly
to recognize this as the fact, in the following passage
of his history:

' The Phenicians who came with Cadmus, and of
whom the Gephyreans were a part, introduced
during their residence in Greece various articles of
science, and among other things letters, with which,
as I conceive, the Greeks were before unacquainted.
These were at first such as the Phenicians themselves
indiscriminately use; in process of time, however,
they were changed both in sound and form. At that
time the Greeks most contiguous to this people were
the lonians, who learned these letters of the Pheni-
cians, and with some trifling variations, received
them into common use. As the Phenicians first made
them known in Greece, they called them, as justice
required, Phenician letters.' (Book v. c. 58. Beloe's
Translation).

The Egyptians, who claimed the honor of the
invention for themselves, also asserted, that 'the
Phenicians, because they had the dominion of the
sea, carried letters into Greece, and acquired the
glory of having invented that, which they had found
already made to their hands.' (Tacitus, Annal. xi.
14).

That the Phenicians were not the original inven-
ters of the alphabet, appears evident also from the
fact, that the names of the letters show them clearly
to be of Shemitish origin; while the Phenicians
were descended from Ham, and not from Shem,
though by their contiguity to the Shemites, their

ALPHABETIC WRITING. 91

language became somewhat similar. (Gen. x: 14-
20). Again, the Phenicians were a commercial and
nautical people; but none of the names of the letters
are derived from objects peculiar to such a people,
but they are exclusively of agricultural and pastoral
origin, a fact which exactly corresponds with the
Chaldee source to which we have ascribed them.

IX. ALPHABETIC WRITING NOT OF EGYPTIAN ORIGIN.

Another opinion among the ancients w^as, that
alphabetic writing originated with the Egyptians^
So Cicero remarks from Plato, that ' Mercury is said
to have taught the Egyptians laws and letters.'
(De Natura Deorum, iii. 22).

Tacitus also says, that ' the Egyptians first repre-
sented their thoughts by the figures of animals [hiero-
glyphics]; and these most ancient monuments of
human memory are still seen impressed on stone;
and they boast that they themselves w^ere also the
inventers of letters.' (Annal. xi. 14).

This error originated in the fact, that the Greeks,
deriving their science and religion from Egypt, were
naturally disposed to give the Egyptians credit for
the invention of letters, which they claimed.

But the Egyptians were also the decendants of
Ham (Gen. x. 1 3), and not one of the original names
of the letters is of Egyptian origin. Moreover, it is
a fact that the Egyptians had no proper alphabet till
after the time of Christ. When the bible was trans-
lated into their language by the early christian mis-
sionaries, it was done by means of an alphabet made
from the Greek.

92 ALPHABETIC WRITING*

X. HIEROGLYPHIC WRITING.

It is true that the Egyptians had very early, and
probably before the time of Abraham, a mode of writ-
ing peculiar to themselves, and which they always
retained during the whole period of their national
independence; but this was the hieroglyphic, and
not the alphabetic. The difference between these
two modes of writing is so great, that it is not at all
probable that the one was ever derived from the
other. As alphabetic writing originated among the
children of Shem, so the hieroglyphic had its origin
among the children of Ham. The more striking
differences are the following:

1. In alphabetic writing, sounds are represented
directly, and ideas only indirectly; but in hiero-
glyphics it is the reverse, ideas are represented
directly, and sounds only indirectly. For example,
if I would indicate on a map the place where a battle
had been fought, I might do it alphabetically by writ-
ing the word battle; and these letters would repre-
sent directly only the sounds in the word battle, and
the idea only indirectly, as it has been associated
with those sounds. But were I to indicate the same
thing hieroglyphically, I might do it by placing the
figure of two swords crossing each other, and these
would represent the idea directly and the sounds
only indirectly, as they happen to be associated
with that idea. Hence a hieroglyphic may convey
the same idea to persons who speak different lan-
guages, but a knowledge of the language is neces-
sary to the reception of an idea from an alphabetic
word.

ALPHABETIC WRITING. 93

2. When hieroglyphics represent sounds, there is an
endless variety of characters for the same sound;
and the figures chosen to represent the sound are
not arbitrary; but in alphabetic writing the figures
are abitrary, and each sound has its appropriate
character.

3. Hieroglyphics represent full syllables, but
alphabets only the elements of syllables.

These differences will be made obvious by a brief
explanation of the mode of hieroglyphic writing.

There are three sorts of hieroglyphics, namely,
the figurative, the symbolic, and the phonetic.

We will illustrate these different kinds of hiero-
glyphics by their application to the name of the
Egyptian god Osiris. To express the name of this
deity by a figurative hieroglyphic, a full picture of
the god must be drawn. To represent the same by
a symbolic hieroglyphic, a picture must be made of
the tiara and wand, the symbols of the god, with
which he is always represented. To express the
same by phonetic hieroglyphics, a series of pictures
must be made, of visible objects, the first sounds in
whose names shall be the successive sounds in the
word Osir, the Egyptian name of which Osiris is the
Greek form, or, as written in the oriental manner
without the intermediate vowel, Osr, The first
sound is represented by the picture of a reed, the
Egyptian name of which is oke, the second by the
picture of a child, in Egyptian si, the third by the
picture of a mouth, in Egyptian ro, thus:
O = oke = reed
S = si = child
R = ro = mouth.

94 ALPHABETIC WRITING.

Different phonetic characters are used to express
the same sound, according to the character of the
object represented. Thus the letter L can be repre-
sented by the picture of a lion, the Egyptian name
of which is laboi; and in spelling the names of sov-
ereigns, as Alexander, Cleopatra, Ptolemy, &:c., this
sound is always represented by a picture of this king
of beasts. The same letter, however, may also be
represented by a picture of the human arm, the
name of which in Egyptian begins with this sound;
and in spelling the name of a common man, in which
the letter L occurs, the arm is the figure used.

We may illustrate this mode of writing by applying
it to a modern name, for example that of Sir Walter
Scott. Taking only the surname, and omitting the
vowel and one of the double consonants, according
to the oriental custom, we have the letters S C T
to be represented. To represent these letters in a
manner appropriate to the character of Sir Walter
as a knight and a scholar, we might make the pic-
tures of a Sword, a Candle, and a Table ; if we would
do it in a manner complimentary to him as a poet
and novelist of feudal scenes, a Scroll, a Cavern, and
a Tower; if in a vituperative and contemptuous
manner, a Sink, a Cock, and a Turkey.

Such is the nature of hieroglyphic writing, and
thus widely does it differ from alphabetic.

XI. TESTIMONY OF THE CHURCH FATHERS.

It may be well here to notice what is said by the
church fathers on this subject.

ALPHABETIC WRITING. 95

Clemens Alexandrinus observes, that 'it is said
that the Phenicians and Syrians first invented let-
ters.' Strom. I. 132. v. 28.

Eusebius, ' The Syrians are they who first invent-
ed letters.' Praep. Evang. x. 5.

Theophilus of Antioch, 'Some say that letters
were invented by the Chaldeans, some by the
Egyptians, others by the Phenicians.' Autoly. iii. in
fine.

Thus the results to which we have come, are not
contradicted, but rather confirmed, by the testimony
of the church fathers.

XII. SUMMARY OF RESULTS.

As results of the preceding investigation, we draw
the following conclusions in reference to the origin
of alphabetic writing.

1. The names of the simple sounds were first
derived from the names of visible objects containing
those sounds.

2. Letters were originally rude pictures of those
objects.

3. All the alphabets, so far as known, were deriv-
ed from a common source.

4. This source was with the descendants of Shem,
and among the progenitors of the Hebrew nation.

5. The invention was as early as the time of
Abraham, and probably much earlier.

6. The original alphabet is not now in existence.

7. The form of the letters have been changed by
a gradual process of refinement.

9Q ALPHABETIC WRITING.

XIII. CONCLUDING REMARKS.

From the preceding historical investigation, it is
evident that the objection against the antiquity of
the early parts of the bible, and its general historical
correctness, derived from the supposed rude condi-
tion of the arts among the ancients, and their v^^ant
of an alphabet, and of suitable materials for w^riting,
is altogether futile, and owes its whole influence to
an ignorance of antiquity. And here I would advise
every one who wishes to bring a historical objection
against the bible, for his own credit's sake, to make
sure of it before he uses it; for every objection of
this kind which has ever been made, has, on investi-
gation, been found, thus far, to be the result of igno-
rance, and not of learning, of superficial assumption,
and not of mature examination.

Let one example give the character of all the
rest.

When the French philosophers visited Egypt, in
the expedition under Napoleon, they found a most
magnificent Egyptian temple at Denderah, whose
walls were covered with hieroglyphic inscriptions,
which they were then unable to read. Among other
curiosities, they noticed what they supposed to be a
representation of the signs of the zodiac; and insti-
tuting a calculation founded on the astronomical fact
of the precession of the equinoxes, they inferred
and thought they proved, that on the supposition
that the solstice represented, were the winter sol-
stice, the temple must have been built fifteen thou-
sand years before, that is, nine thousand before the
Mosaic account of the creation ; or on the more

ALPHABETIC WRITING. 97

moderate supposition that it was the summer solstice,
then the temple was built three thousand two hun-
dred and twenty-eight years before the French expe-
dition, about one hundred years before the Mosaic
account of the deluge; and in either case, suspicion
would be brought upon the truth of the bible. So
high an antiquity was distasteful to the most learned
men of Europe, and from considerations drawn from
astronomical facts and the progress of the arts,
Visconti, the celebrated antiquarian, was inclined
to assign to it a much later origin, in which he was
sustained by the observations of Belzoni the trav-
eler. After a warm and protracted controversy,
those best acquainted with the subject, settled down
in the conviction that the weight of testimony decid-
ed that the temple must have been built about the
time of the commencement of the christian era; and
at length an inscription was discovered above the en-
trance to the first apartment of the temple, which,
when decyphered, was found to state that the temple
was built by the inhabitants of the province, while
Publius Avillius Flaccus was prefect of Egypt, which
is known to have been in the year of our Lord 35;
and of course all the speculations of learned infidelity
about the famous zodiac of Denderah, which so lono-
agitated the literary circles of Europe, have now
fallen to the ground. (See Modern Traveler, Egypt,
vol. ii. p. 61-74, London edition).

There are many devices in a man's hearty neverthe-
less^ the counsel of the Lord, that shall stand, (Prov.
xix. 21).

9

98 ALPPIABETIC WRITING.

Note. — As authorities for the principal facts on which the
above reasonings are founded, I refer the reader to the fol-
lowing works, in addition to those already quoted.

Walton's Prolegomena to the Polyglott Bible.
Pfeiffer's Opera Philologica.
Goguet's Origin of Laws, Arts, and {Sciences.
Eichhorn's Introduction to the Old Testament (in German).
Geseniue's History of the Hebrew Language, (do.)

Kopp's Pictures and Writings of Antiquity, (^^o*)

Ewald's Hebrew Grammar, (do.)

Hoffman's Syrian Grammar.
Spineto on Hieroglyphics.

Greppo on Hieroglyphics, translated by I. .Stuart,
.lahn's Biblical Archaeology, translated by professor IJpham.
Do. Introduction to the 6ld Testament, translated by pro-
fessor Turner.

CHAPTER SIXTH.

AUTHENTICITY OF THE FOUR GOSPELS.

I. ORIGIN OF THE GOSPELS.

Having thus established the authenticity of the
five books of Moses, we now enter on a similar pro-
cess of investigation in reference to the four gos-
pels. I take up the gospels next to the Pentateuch,
because, if the first five books of the Old Testament
and the first four of the New be proved authentic,
the process of proof in respect to almost all the
others may be made very brief and simple.

The four gospels which we have, and these only,
have always been acknowledged and quoted by
Christians and heretics, Jews and pagans, as the
authoritative books of the christian church. Other
gospels have existed, and heretics have claimed for
them equal or superior authority, to those which we
regard as authentic; but it has never been pretended
that the christian church has acknowledged any
other gospels as canonical.

Almost uniformly they have been arranged in the
same order in which we now have them. The most
remarkable exceptions are the famous Beza manu-
script preserved in the library of the university at

100 THE FOUR GOSPELS.

Cambridge in England, and the old Gothic transla-
tion by Ulphilas; in both which the gospel of John
is placed immediately after that of Matthew. The
order in which they are usually arranged, is most
probably the order of time in which they were
written.

The origin of the gospels, according to the best
circumstantial evidence that we can obtain, seems
to have been this : The apostles preached Christy
that is, they told their hearers who Christ was, what
he had done, and taught, and suffered 5 and explained
the connection between the life and death of Jesus
and the religious w^elfare of mankind. As was cus-
tomary in ancient times, when books were rare and
sold at an exorbitant price, many of their hearers
took notes of their discourses, and sent copies of
them to their friends. These notes, necessarily im-
perfect, without authority, and sometimes perhaps
contradictory, were w^idely circulated. To prevent
confusion and mistake, the evangelists were divinely
directed to write and publish authentic narratives,
for the instruction of their contemporaries and
posterity.

Luke refers to these prior accounts, which had
been written and circulated, in chapter i. v. 1, of his
gospel: Forasmuch as many have taken in hand to
set forth in order, &:c. 'Many' cannot refer to Mat-
thew and Mark, who had written before him; for
two could hardly be styled 'many;' and in verse 4,
Luke says he wrote, that the 'certainty,' respect-
isg the Saviour, might be known. Now, if Mat-
thew and Mark had been referred to in the word

THE FOrXR GOSPELS. tOI

^many,' there would have been no need of writing
another account, as they were credible and inspired
writers as well as Luke.

II. ORIGINAL MODE OF PUBLICATION.

We have information, respecting the original mode
of publishing the New Testament, much more cer-
tain than we have in regard to the Old. In the age
of the New Testament writers, the most common
and convenient material of writing was papyrus — a
sort of paper formed of the inner bark of a reed
which abounds in Egypt, and flourishes also on the
banks of the Tigris and Euphrates. Of this there
were three kinds, the sacred, the common, and the
epistolary. The first was very expensive, and its
use limited principally to the pagan priesthood in
Egypt. The epistolary was thin and perishable,
but the common papyrus was more firm and durable,
and this probably was the kind used by the writers
of the New Testament. Paul in one passage speaks
of parchment, and in a manner which indicates that
he set a high value upon it (2 Tim. iv. 1 3).

Authors, at that period, seldom committed their
own compositions to writing, and never for the use
of the public. The preparation of manuscripts was
then a trade, as much as printing and bookbinding
are now. Paul usually did not write even his own
epistles (Rom. xvi. 22; Gal. vi. 11); but to prevent
forgery he wrote his own name with the concluding-
salutation (1 Cor. xvi. 21; 2 Thess, iii. 17; Col. iv.,
18). He urges it as a strong proof of his tender and

deep interest in tne Galatians, that he had writteiL
9*

102 THE FOUR GOSPELS.

to them so large an epistle with his own hand,
though the epistle itself is much shorter than that
to the Romans, which was written by Tertius;
and to the Thessalonians he writes, 'the salutation
of Paul with mine own hand, which is the token
in every epistle: so I write.'

The author dictated to one whose business it was
to write rapidly, and who wa& denominated by the
Greeks "^^x^yp^-^^i (tachugraphos) swift writer^ and by
the Latins notarius or amanuensis^ This was copied
in a fair character by the ^>.».«yp*?ej (kalligraphos)
fine writer^ called also B'PA..cyp«?.of {bihliographos)^ and
by the Latins librarius. The manuscript was then
submitted to one whose business it was to see
whether the whole was accurately written, and to
correct any errors which might have occurred.

The work thus prepared was dedicated to some
patron of learning or of the author, as Josephus
directed his writings to Epaphroditus, and Luke his
to Theophilus; or to some association, as the epistles
of Paul were generally directed to a church; or to
some friend, as Paul wrote to Timothy, to Titus,
and to Philemon; and through these channels they
w^ere made known to the public (Compare Hug's
Introduction to the New Testament, vol. i. p. 106 ff.
in German).

III. CANONICAL AUTHORITY.

Those books and those only were regarded by
the primitive christians as of canonical authority,
which were written by apostles, or by the compan-
ions of the apostles under apostolic superintendence.

THE FOUR GOSPELS. 1Q3

The question in regard to the canonical authority of
any book, therefore, was a question of simple fact, in
respect to which the churches at that time had every
opportunity of forming a correct judgment. Most
of the churches were personally acquainted with
several of the apostles; and everyone of the writers
of the New Testament was personally known to
many of the churches.

The churches from which the books of the New
Testament proceeded, were situated around the
shores of the Mediterranean sea, from Egypt, through
Palestine, Asia Minor, and Greece, to Italy; and
through these countries, in consequence of the ex-
tensive military operations of the Roman empire, and
the roads established for the convenience of the sol-
diery, and the glory of Rome and the preservation of
her power, communication was then easy and fre-
quent. These churches were engaged in a great
and common cause, in the prosecution of which
they were obliged to encounter obloquy and perse-
cution of the severest kind; and naturally they be-
came strongly attached to each other, and the more
intimately connected the more they were separated
from the rest of the world. Thus we find them
relieving each other's necessities by charitable con-
tributions (Acts xi. 29; 1 Cor. xvi. 1-3; 2 Cor. viii.
1; Gal. ii. 10). Ministers and church members
traveling, were recommended by one church to
another: (Acts xviii. 27; Rom. xvi. 1, 2; 2 Cor. iii. 1;
Col. iv. 10). Churches sent friendly salutations to
one another (2 Cor. xiii» 1 ; Phil. iv. 22). Apostolie.

104 THE FOUR GOSPELS.

writings were sent from one church to another (CoL.
iv. 16).

The churches so intimately connected, so fre-
quently visited by different apostles, and teachers,
and church members, and continually sending their
sacred writings from one to another, could not be
deceived as to what were apostolic books, and what
not. It would be perfectly easy to ascertain, in
respect to any production, whether an apostle com-
posed it or superintended its composition. If this
were the case, the book was received as of canoni-
cal authority; if not, its claims to such authority
were rejected.

It would have been impossible to impose upon
these churches spurious books, as the writings of the
apostles or apostolic men, during their lifetime, or the
lifetime of the members of the churches who had
been acquainted with them. Such deception, every
one knows, would be impossible now. No one could
write a letter to the churches of the United States
or Great Britain, or any of the countries of Europe,
and affix to it the name of any well known living
preacher, as Dr. Chalmers, or of one recently de-
ceased, as Robert Hall, w^ithout exposing himself to
immediate detection. Deception would have been
equally impossible then; for communication was then
equally easy and frequent between the several places
where churches were situated, and the connection
between the churches was still more intimate than
it is now.

The canonical books were kept in a sacred deposi-
tory in the churches, as the manuscript rolls of the

THE FOUR GOSPELS. 105

Old Testament are still kept by the Jews in their
synagogues; and they were read in course every
Lord's day as a part of the regular religious service.
Books written by those who were not apostles or
apostolic men, as Clemens Romanus, Ignatius, Poly-
carp, and others, were also occasionally read in pub-
lic on the Lord's day, for the instruction of the con-
gregation; as ministers now sometimes read occa-
sional communications from the pulpit. But the
reading of these books did not make a part of the
regular religious service, they were not considered
authoritative, nor were they allowed to be kept in
the sacred receptacle.

The internal and circumstantial evidence confirms
the judgment of the ancient churches respecting the
canonical authority of these books.

1. The contents of the books agree in every re-
spect with what we know from other sources con-
cerning the history of those times; and nothing can
be detected in them inconsistent with their claims
to authenticity. They exhibit no marks of a later
composition; and the characteristic peculiarities of
style by which the several books are distinguished
from each other, give evidence of their genuineness.

2. The dialect in which these books are written,
is a convincing proof of their genuineness. They
are written in a Hebraistic Greek, which was used
only by Jews of the first century, and went en-
tirely into disuse among all christian writers before
the close of the second century. These books, then,
if they are forgeries, must have been forged during
the lives of the men to whom they are ascribed, or

106 THE FOUR GOSPELS.

immediately after their death; and it is utterly-
incredible that such forgeries should ever have gain-
ed general credit.

But v^e have abundant direct testimony to the
genuineness and consequent canonical authority of
these books.

1. These books are constantly quoted by christian,
heretical, and pagan writers, from the first century
downv^^ard. These quotations are drav^^n out at
length by Dr. Lardner, in his Credibility of the Gos-
pel History; and a clear and concise view of them
is given by Dr. Paley in his Evidences of Christianity
(ch. ix. sect. 1), to which I refer the reader.

2. Early in the second century, Tatian, an Assy-
rian christian, a disciple of Justin Martyr, composed
a harmony of the four gospels which we now have.

3. Early in the third century, catalogues of the
sacred writings of the New Testament were made
out; the oldest of which now extant is ascribed to
Caius, a presbyter at Rome, and contains the four
gospels as we now have them.

During the same century, lived Origen of Alex-
andria, the most learned, zealous, and indefatigable
of all the fathers, who gives a catalogue of the writ-
ings of the New Testament, among which are
the four gospels. He is allegorizing, according to
his manner, on the account of the falling down of
the walls of Jericho, at the blowing of the trumpet,
and applying the allegory, he says: *The first who
blew the trumpet, was Matthew, then Mark, Luke,
and John, among the Evangelists. Peter did the
same in two epistles, then James and Jude. John

THE FOUR GOSPELS. 107

set up again the trumpet call, by his epistles and the
Revelation, and Luke in Acts. But last came Paul,
and battered down the whole with the fourteen blasts
of his epistles. A little after, Eusebius, the histo-
rian, gives the same account (Eccl. Hist. iii. 25).

If we judge of these books as we would of others,
or even if we add to their evidence a demand of
more, corresponding to their surpassing interest, can
there be a doubt of their genuineness? Dr. Paley
has pursued this argument with great skill and con-
clusiveness in his Evidences (chap, ix); and as this
is a book so common, and so easily accessible, it is
not necessary here to go into that minuteness of his-
torical investigation, by which the genuineness of
the Pentateuch has been established.

IV. CREDIBILITY OF THE GOSPELS.

I do not here touch the question of the inspira-
tion or divine authority of the gospels; but simply
the credibility of the writers as men — as men capa-
ble and honest, or incapable and dishonest. Their
claims to inspiration will be considered in another
place. As evidence of their credibility we observe,

1. They were well qualified to give testimony re-
specting all the facts which they relate ; for three of
them, Matthew, Mark, and John, were eyewitnesses
of the transactions which they record, and Luke
made himself acquainted with the facts by a diligent
investigation of the whole subject. Their manner
of writing, and all that we know respecting them,
proves that they were men of capacity and discern-
ment sufficient to make them competent judges of

108 THE FOUR GOSPELS.

(

the nature of all the circumstances which they
relate.

2. They give every proof of the most perfect
simplicity and honesty. They impartially narrate
their own faults, and the faults of their brethren;
when, persecuted and defamed as they were, it would
be very natural for men in their situation to endeavor
to palliate each other's failings. They expose all
their weaknesses; when, if they had been impostors,
it would have been greatly for their interest to have
concealed them. They record with singular fidelity
the severe rebukes which they received from their
master for their timidity, forgetfulness, thoughtless-
ness and unbelief (Compare Matt. xxvi. 69; Mark vi.
49-52; viii. 14-21; Luke xxiv. 25, and many other pas-
sages). What stronger proofs of honesty is it possi-
ble to require?

3. They changed their whole mode of life in con-
sequence of their belief of the facts which they
stated, and endured all manner of suffering in attes-
tation of their truth. They themselves certainly
believed that those things of which they testified,
had actually occurred; and these facts were of such
a nature, and such were the circumstances of the
case, that the witnesses could not have believed
them, unless they had actually taken place.

4. If their statements had not been true, the false-
hood could have been easily detected; — for they
were continually surrounded by bitter enemies who
were ceaselessly watchful to seize upon every ad-
vantage to hinder their progress. The Jews from all
parts of the world were continually coming to Judea,

M

THE FOUR GOSPELS. 109

with full opportunity to learn every thing that
occurred there, and to report it when they returned
to their homes. But the principal facts of the gos-
pel history, instead of being denied, were admitted
by its enemies; and Judas himself, who had been
intimate with the disciples, enjoyed their confidence,
and partaken in all their counsels, and who had
every inducement to excuse his own baseness by
alleging crime against him whom he had betrayed,
offered no such vindication of himself, but acknowl-
edged that he had sinned and betrayed the innocent,
and gave proof of the reality of his remorse and the
depth of his wretchedness by violently destroying
his own life. What stronger testimony can we have
to the innocency of Jesus and the integrity of the
gospel history?

5. It is impossible that the character of Jesus
should be a fiction, invented by such men as the
writers of the New Testament. Their education,
character, circumstances, every thing precludes the
idea of their possessing the ability or the inclination
to conceive and delineate such a character, unless
they had actually seen it exhibited before their eyes.
Where in that corrupt age, where in all the history
of the world, could they have found a model on which
to form so grand, so perfect an idea? And if a model,
or even the nucleus of such a character, had existed,
how were poor, unlettered publicans and fishermen
to learn the skill to fashion and exhibit it with such
beauty and effect?

A character possessing every virtue, without any
^of the corresponding failings, towards which, in im-
10

110 THE FOUR GOSPELS.

perfect human nature, each virtue leans — courage
without rashness, humility without meanness, dig-
nity without arrogance, perseverence without obsti-
nacy, affection without weakness — always acting
in exact consistency, and never ruffled by anger or
depressed by despair, in all the severe and aggravat-
ing trials through which he passed. How could they
draw such a character except from the living person?
And who could this person have been, if not he who
came down from heaven? How short was his stay
upon earth! scarcely two years of public life, and yet
how glorious, how permanent the results! A world
disenthralled, corrupting and debasing superstitions
overthrown, men placed in circumstances of im-
provement by which they are continually advancing
their social and public welfare; and now, nearly two
thousand years after his death, while other founders
of religious systems of more recent origin have
already lost their hold on the human mind, the influ-
ence of Jesus of Nazareth is yet rife and fresh, and
more extensive and powerful than it has ever been
before; still increasing and strengthening and bright-
ening, and evidently to go on till the affections of
every human heart shall be gained, and every tongue
shall confess him. Lord! Has all this grown out of a
fiction contrived by the poor fishermen of Galilee?

6. A comparison of these books with the spurious
gospels, and other similar writings of that and the
subsequent period, sets the whole argument in the
strongest possible light, and shows conclusively, that
the received gospels must have had an origin alto-
gether different. The puerilities of these spurious^

THE FOUR GOSPELS^ HI

books, their absurdities and contradictions, and their
total destitution of all moral interest, throw additional
lustre upon the dignity, the correctness, and the sub-
lime moral tone and thrilling religious sentiment of
the genuine writings of the New Testament. As an
example, take the following paragraphs from the
gospel of the Infancy of Jesus, and contrast them
with any portion of equal length from either of the
acknowledged gospels.

'And Joseph, wheresoever he went in the city,
took the Lord Jesus with him, where he was sent for
to work, to make gates, or milk-pails, or sieves, or
boxes; the Lord Jesus was wdth him, wheresoever
he went. And as often as Joseph had any thing in
his work to make longer or shorter, or wqder or nar-
rower, the Lord Jesus would stretch his hand
towards it, and presently it became as Joseph would
have it; so that he had no need to finish any thing
with his own hands, for he was not very skilful at
his carpenter's trade.'

'On a certain time the king of Jerusalem sent for
him, and said, "I would have thee make me a throne,
of the same dimensions of that place in which I com-
monly sit." Joseph obeyed and forthw^ith began the
work, and continued two years in the king's palace
before he finished it. And when he came to fix it
in its place, he found it wanted two spans on each
side, of the appointed measure, which when the
king saw, he was very angry with Joseph; and Jo-
seph, afraid of the king's anger, went to bed without
his supper, not taking any thing to eat. Then the
Lord Jesus asked him what he was afraid of. Joseph

112 THE FOUR GOSPELS.

replied, Because I have lost my labor in the work
which I have been about these two years. Jesus
said to him, "Fear not, neither be cast down; do
thou lay hold on one side of the throne, and I will
the other; and we will bring it to its just dimen-
sions." And when Joseph had done as the Lord
Jesus said, and each of them had with strength drawn
his side, the throne obeyed and was brought to the
proper dimensions of the place; which miracle, when
they who stood by saw, they w^ere astonished and
praised God. The throne w^as made of the same
wood which was in being in Solomon's time, namely,
wood adorned with various shapes and figures.'

The above is not an unfavorable specimen of the
matter and style of these spurious productions.
Even the genuine writings of the leading christian
teachers who succeeded the apostles, as Clemens
Romanus, Ignatius, Polycarp, and others, fall very
far below the dignity, the intelligence, the strong
practical sense, and the purity of religious feeling,
everywhere so manifest in the writings of the New
Testament. These writings, and all others which
were not received as canonical, whether genuine
and valuable or not, were by the primitive churches
called aj)ocryphal -^^^p"?* {apokrujjlia) hidden or con-
cealed^ because they were not regarded as author-
itative, nor used in the public religious services,
nor kept in the sacred depository. At present the
term is generally used to designate a spurious book
which claims a divine authority that it does not pos-
sess, though some of the apocryphal writings of the
Old Testament are authentic and valuable produc-

THE FOUR GOSPELS, 113

tions, as, for example, the first book of Maccabees,
and the book of Jesus son of Sirach.

Most of the apocryphal writings of the New Tes-
tament have been translated into English, and they
were published in London in 1820, and a second
edition in 1821 (See Home's Introduction, vol. i. p.
635, ft').

As a specimen of another kind, read the following,
from the gospel of Nicodemus. It is a part of the
description of Christ's descent into hell.

' Then w^as there a great voice as of the sound of
thunder, saying. Lift up your heads, O princes, and
be ye lifted up, ye gates of hell, and the king of
glory will enter in. The prince of hell perceiving
the same voice repeated, cried out as though he had
been ignorant. Who is that king of glory? David
replied to the prince of hell and said, I understand
the w^ords of that voice, because I spake them by his
Spirit. And now, as I have above said, I say unto
thee. The Lord strong and powerful, the Lord
mighty in battle, he is the king of glory, and he is
the Lord in heaven and in earth: He hath looked
down to hear the groans of the prisoners, and to set
loose those that are appointed to death. And now
thou filthy and stinking, prince of hell, open thy
gates, that the king of glory may enter in, for he is
the Lord of heaven and earth. While David was
saying this, the mighty Lord appeared in the form of
a man, and enlightened those places which had ever
before been in darkness, and broke asunder the fet-
ters which before could not be broken, and with his.
inconceivable power visited those who sat in the-
10*

114 THE FOUR GOSPELS^

deep darkness by iniquity, and the shadows of death
by sin/

'Impious death and her cruel officers hearing these
things, were seized with fear in their several king-
doms, when they saw the clearness of the light, and
Christ himself on a sudden appearing in their habita-
tions. They cried out, therefore, and said, We are
bound by thee; thou seemest to intend our confu-
sion before the Lord. Who art thou, who hast no
signs of confusion, but that bright appearance which
is a full proof of thy greatness, of which yet thou
seemest to take no notice?'

•^' :¥• ^ * * *

'Then the king of glory, trampling upon death,
seized the prince of hell, deprived him of all his
power, and took our earthly father Adam with him
to his glory.'

CHAPTER SEVENTH

CHARACTER OF THE GOSPELS.

GENERAL REMARKS.

One of the first remarks we make on examining^
the four gospels is, that while the first three have a
striking general resemblance to each other, the
fourth is altogether peculiar, frequently in the sub-
stance of the narrative itself and always in the mode
of narrating. So marked is this peculiarity of John,
that the simple enunciation of a single sentence from
his gospel strikes the ear in a way that precludes the
possibility of referring it to either of the other
evangelists.

Another thing which we notice is, that the several
evangelists, in narrating the same circumstance or
reporting the same discourse, seldom or never em-
ploy exactly the same words; but each rather gives
the sense in forms of expression slightly varied. To
illustrate this fact by a single example, take the sen-
tence which was pronounced from heaven at the time
of our Saviour's baptism. Matthew (iii. 1 7) gives it,
' This is my beloved son, in whom I am well pleas-
ed;' Mark (i. 11) Thou art my beloved son, in whom
lam well pleased;' and Luke (iii. 22) 'Thou art my

116 CHARACTER OF TTTE GOSPELS*

beloved son, in thee I am well pleased.' A like vari-
ation is often observable in the quotation of the
same passage of the Old Testament by the different
writers of the New. For example, compare Deut.
viii. 3 and vi. 13, as quoted by Matthew (iv. 4, 10)
and by Luke (iv. 4, 8). In all these cases, the sense
is faithfully preserved, but the phraseology is varied.
The writers of the New Testament, indeed, never
appear to aim at exact quotations of language, and
provided the meaning is given, the mode of ex-
pression is regarded as of comparatively little
importance.

Two of the evangelists only, Matthew and Luke^
give an account of the birth and childhood of Christ;
but all the four are very particular in their details
respecting his death and resurrection; for these
were the great events on which the most important
consequences depended.

The most important fact, however, to be borne
in mind in reading the gospels, is, that they are
neither histories nor full biographies, but simply
scattered notices of transactions and discourses in-
tended to illustrate particular points in the character
of Christ, and so arranged as to secure this purpose,
but with little regard to the order of time. The
evangelists disclaim all intention of writing complete
and consecutive narratives, and declare that their
whole design is, by relating a few facts, to give such
an impression respecting the character, teachings,
and works of Christ, as might induce men to receive
him as the promised Messiah, the Saviour of the
world (John xx. 30, 31; xxi. 25). The evangelist

CHARACTER OF THE GOSPELS. 117

here says, expressly, that he had taken but few facts
from the whole number which had fallen under his
notice, and that these had been selected with exclu-
sive reference to the object above stated. We are
not to look, therefore, for complete biography or
chronological arrangement in the gospels, but only
for detached examples of the teachings and doings
of Christ, suited to illustrate his character.

The character of the gospels in this respect can
be easily illustrated by analogous examples from
classical literature. After the death of Socrates,
his disciples Plato and Xenophon undertook by their
literary efforts to vindicate the character of their
master from the aspersions cast upon it by his ene-
mies. The work of Xenophon is divided into four
books and subdivided into distinct topics. The
topics of the first book are the following:

I. Socrates did not contemn the gods of his coun-
try, nor introduce new objects of worship.

II. Socrates was not a corrupter of young men.

III. What sort of man Socrates was, both in
words and deeds, during his whole life.

IV. How Socrates demonstrated the existence of
God.

V. How Socrates discoursed on temperance.

VI. Disputation of Socrates with. Antiphon the
sophist.

VII. How Socrates dissuaded men from arrogance.
Each of these topics is illustrated by anecdotes

respecting Socrates, and by reports of conversations
which he had with different persons, bearing on the
several points ; and these are thrown together in the

118 CHARACTER OF THE GOSPELSr

manner best suited to illustrate the different topicsy
without regard to the order of time in which the
transactions or conversations actually took place,
and without any endeavor to preserve the appear-
ance of continuity of narrative. Accordingly, this
work is never regarded as a biography of Socrates,
and is always referred to under the appellation of
memoirs or memorabilia. Its Greek title »^°f*^'^i**yivf*-^u
{apomnemoneumata) is applied by Justin Martyr to
the gospels, and with great propriety, for they are
works of precisely the same kind.

An examination of the gospel of Matthew will
show, that it is constructed on a plan very similar to
that of Xenophon's Memorabilia of Socrates. After
a brief notice of the birth and childhood of Jesus
(i. ii.), and his entrance on his public ministry
(iii. iv.), Matthew proceeds to show what Christ was
as a public teacher of religion, and gives an adequate
example of the nature of his instructions and his
mode of communicating them, by reporting at con-
siderable length the substance of his sermon on the
ijiount (v-vii). I say the substance of the sermon,
for it is evident that Matthew does not give the
whole discourse word for word as it was uttered,
from the fact that Luke, who makes a much briefer
abstract of the same sermon (vi. 20-49), has yet
inserted some things omitted by Matthew, as for ex-
ample, the three woes corresponding to the beati-
tudes (Luke vi. 25).

Matthew next exhibits Christ as a worker of mira-
cles, and collects into one connected view several
miracles of different kinds, wrought in various

CHARACTER OF THE GOSPELS. 119

places and at different times, for the purpose of
showing what Christ was in reference to the exercise
of miraculous powers (viii. ix).

He afterwards exhibits Christ in another view, as
a teacher by parables, and collects together several
different parables as a specimen of this most inter-
esting mode of teaching (xiii).

Thus throughout his gospel, Matthew does not fol-
low any chronological series of events or instruc-
tions, but groups together things of the same kind,
and shows, by a series of living pictures, what Christ
was in all the various circumstances through which
he passed. This mode of waiting was chosen by
him, for the same reason that it had been before by
Xenophon, because it was the best adapted to the
particular purpose he had in view, which was to
vindicate the character of Christ before his country-
men, and set it in its true light.

Christ had been the great moral teacher and bene-
factor of his nation. He had been undervalued,
slandered, and persecuted all his life, and was at last
unjustly doomed to a cruel death, attended with all
the circumstances of indignity and shame, which
could be brought together to blast his reputation
and throw a shade over the splendor of his exalted
virtues. MattheAv, his disciple, like Xenophon, the
disciple of Socrates, knew and could appreciate his
master's worth; and by a simple detail of what he
did and said in various circumstances and on differ-
ent topics, sought to disarm the prejudices of his
countrymen, and bring them to see what sort of a

120 CHARACTER OF THE GOSPELS.

man he was, whom their rulers with wicked hands
had crucified and slain.

After these general remarks we shall now turn
our attention to the particular circumstances of
each one of the evangelists, the special object each
had in view w^hile writing, and the distinguishing
peculiarities of each one of the several gospels.

For a knowledge of these particulars we must
rely mainly on incidental and brief hints scattered
through the New Testament; for the evangelists
never make themselves prominent in their narratives,
nor give any details respecting their personal history
and circumstances. They preach not themselves^ hut
Christ Jesus the Lord,

II. GOSPEL OF MATTHEW.

Matthew was a Galilean Jew, and held the office
of a receiver of customs under the Roman govern-
ment, at the sea of Tiberias, near Capernaum (Matt.
ix. 9). By Mark he is called Levi, son of Alpheus
(Mark ii. 14). When a Jew became a Roman citi-
zen he generally assumed a Roman name; and it is
probable that Levi was the original Hebrew, and
Matthew the assumed Roman name of this evange-
list. He left his business at the call of Christ, and
became his permanent attendant and one of the
twelve apostles a short time before the delivery of
the sermon on the mount (Luke v. 27). In enume-
rating the apostles he calls himself Matthew the
publican (Matt. x. 9) or customhouse officer, a name
exceedingly odious to the oppressed Jews.

CHARACTER OF THE GOSPELS. 121

The nature of the publican's office, and the injus-
tice and oppression which these officers generally
practised, were enough to excite odium in a nation
less sensitive than the Jewish. When the Romans
subjugated the Jews, they treated them as they did
other conquered nations, that is, they required ot
every man, in addition to various taxes, the payment
of an annual tribute, as a token of his subjection
and for the support of the dignity of the Roman
empire. This tribute was extremely hateful to the
Jews, who boasted that they had no sovereign but
God, that they were Abraham's seed, and were not
in bondage to any man. But oppressive as this tax
was in itself, it often became still more so by the
manner in which it was collected. It was customary
for the government to expose the taxes of a province
to sale, and he who would offer the most for them
had the privilege of collecting; and all that he could
obtain above the amount paid to the government,
went to enrich himself. Those who had thus taken
the taxes of a whole province, would divide the
province into districts, and expose them to sale in
the same manner; and often the district would be
subdivided and sold again; so that sometimes three
or four different sets of extortioners were to be en-
riched out of the surplus tribute money of the people,
above that which went into the public treasury. As
the right of collecting was frequently sold from one
to another at an increasing price, it was for the inte-
rest of the publican to extort as much as possible;
and as the general government participated with the
publicans in their plunder, it was for their interest
11

122 CHARACTER OF THE GOSPELS.

to listen to no complaint against the collectors of
their revenue. There was scarcely a possibility of
redress in case of wrong; and if one refused to sub-
mit to injustice, frequently by false accusation he
was robbed of his whole property (compare Luke
iii. 12-14; xix. 1-10). It is no wonder then, that the
very name of publican became odious, and synony-
mous with that of sinner; though doubtless there
were several who performed the duties of this office
in an honorable and conscientious manner.

It is the unanimous testimony of the ancients, that
Matthew wrote his gospel for the use of the Jewish
christians of Palestine; and this testimony is con-
firmed by internal evidence. The writer everywhere
takes it for granted, that his readers are well acquaint-
ed with the geography of Palestine; and he does not
consider it necessary to explain any of the Jewish
customs to which he alludes. The considerations,
which he adduces to prove the Messiahship of Jesus,
are such as would have most weight with Jews. He
traces the genealogy of Christ from his reputed
father through David to Abraham; and takes parti-
cular pains to show how the prophecies of the Old
Testament were fulfilled in Jesus of Nazareth. Com-
pare i. 23; ii. 6, 15, 18; iii. 3; iv. 14; viii. 17; xii.
17; xiii. 35; xxi. 4; xxvi. 56] xxvii. 9. Indeed, it is
the leading object of his gospel to prove that Jesus is
the Messiah spoken of by the prophets, an argument
which at that time Jews only could appreciate.

Irenseus mentions that this gospel was written
while Peter and Paul were at Rome, between 60
and 65 A. C.

CHARACTER OF THE GOSPELS* 123

It is the testimony of Papias,- bishop of Hieropolis,
early in the second century, and indeed of the an-
cients generally, that Matthew originally wrote his
gospel in Hebrew. It is highly probable that he
might have written some brief notices of the Saviour
in the vernacular language of his countrymen; but
that the Greek gospel we now have, is the only gen-
uine gospel of Matthew, is sustained by the strong-
est proof.

1. No trace of any such Hebrew gospel has ever
been discovered, nor a single quotation made from it
by any ancient writer.

2. The whole structure and complexion of the
Greek gospel shows it to be an original and not a
translation.

3. In Palestine, at the time when Matthew wrote,
Greek was altogether the language of business, of
books, and to a great extent, especially in the cities,
of common conversation; and in Jerusalem itself,
there were whole congregations of Jews who spoke
only Greek. Professor Hug has given this subject a
very thorough and satisfactory investigation in his
Introduction to the New Testament (vol. ii. p. 16-
62 in German); and his reasonings are translated and
published in the Biblical Repository for July, 1831,
(p. 531 f ).

As the result of this investigation, it appears that
Matthew must have had the followina; inducements
to write his gospel in Greek:

1. If he wrote in Greek the mass of the people
would understand him ; and the inhabitants of most
of the cities of Palestine, the Greek congregations

124 CHARACTER OF THE GOSPELS.

in Jerusalem, and the Hellenistic Jews in the christian
church, who were very numerous (Acts vi. 1), could
not have understood him, if he had written in any
other language.

2. If he regarded the eastern territories and the
regions of Decapolis, with which his former business
had brought him into intimate connection, he had a
preponderating motive to employ the Greek language.

3. ' At the same time, if he had the adjacent west-
ern regions in view, if he looked on Antioch, the
capital of Syria, where the believers were first called
christians, or on the neighboring Syrian churches; if
he thought of Tyre, where a christian school already
flourished, or of Sidon and other cities on the Pheni-
cian coast, (Acts xi. 26; xv. 23, 41; xxi. 3, 4; xxvii,
3), he must, if he wished to be understood, have
•written in the Greek language.

4. 'If his whole thoughts were fixed on those latter
times of the people, in which he wrote his book,
believing the predictions of his Lord, which caused
him to expect an approaching dissolution of the
Jewish state, of the prelude to which he was himself
already an eyewitness; and if he wished to produce
an efiect, even when this should be completed; if he
w'lshed to be still understood, when the remnant of
the Jews, without a temple and without public wor-
ship, wandering about and destitute of houses in their
own native land, should have yielded up their posses-
sions to others; if he were desirous of writing not
merely for a few years or a few months; then he
would never have written in the language of this

CHARACTER OF THE GOSPELS. 125

people, who in a short time would cease to exist as a
people.'

We may add, that the business in which Matthew
had been engaged previous to his call to the apostle-
ship, renders it certain that he was himself acquainted
with the Greek language, even if we leave entirely out *^;_.
of view the fact, that the apostles w^ere supernaturally i-'
endowed with the gift of tongues on the day of Pen-
tecost (Acts ii).

Matthew may be styled a plain, matter of fact
writer; and the habits of his mind are evidently those
of a man of business rather than study. He exhibits
Christ mostly in his earthly character and relations;
as a lawgiver, promulgating the new dispensation
from the Mount, as Moses did the old from Sinai; as
a worker of miracles and a teacher. Because he
thus treated of Christ in his earthly employments
and human character, his gospel was by the ancients
called c-*^«T.xDv [somatikon) or the bodily gospel.

He is very brief in narrative, disregarding almost
entirely the order of time, but particular in his re-
ports of the discourses and parables of our Lord, and
generally he gives only just enough of the narrative
to introduce the discourse. In this respect, as well as
in some others, his gospel bears a striking resem-
blance to the work of Xenophon alluded to above.

Indeed, there is the same sort of difference betw^een
the accounts of Jesus Christ as given by Matthew
and John, that we find between the accounts of Soc-
rates as given by Xenophon and Piato.

ir-^

I 26 CHARACTER OF THE GOSPELS.

in. GOSPEL OF MARK.

Mark was the son of a pious woman in Jerusalem,
and tiie intimate friend of the apostle Peter (Acts xii.
12; 1 Pet. V. 13). He was also the friend and com-
panion of Paul (Acts xii. 25; xiii. 5), till some neglect
of his, which occasioned a misunderstanding be-
tween Paul and Barnabas respecting him, produced
a separation (Acts xv. 36-41). Paul afterwards
became reconciled to him, perhaps when he met him
at Rome in company with Peter, and speaks of him
in several of his epistles with great confidence and
affection (Col. iv. 10; 2 Tim. iv. 11; Philemon 24).

According to the almost unanimous testimony of
antiquity, his gospel was written at Rome, under the
superintendence of the apostle Peter, a little after
that of Matthew, and it was intended for the instruc-
tion of the Roman converts from paganism. To
this, internal evidence corresponds. Some learned
men have supposed they could discover a Latin com-
plexion in his style.

He carefully explains allusions to Jewish customs,
as if wi'iting for those who were unacquainted with
them (Mark vii. 2-4 ; xv. 6). He is much more brief
than the other evangelists, and has but twenty four
verses which are not found in Matthew and Luke.
Unlike Matthew he is very particular in narrative,
and very much condenses the conversations and dis-
courses of Jesus.

There is no proof that he had ever seen the gospel
of Matthew before writing his own; much less that
his own is an abridgment of Matthew's, as some

CHARACTER OF THE GOSPELS. 127

have supposed. The contrary is shown from the
fact, that lie is in not a few instances much more
particular in his narratives than Matthew. (Compare
Mark v. 1 with Mat. viii. 28; Mark ix. 14 with Mat.
xvii. 12-14; and Mark xiv. 66, 67 with Matt. xxvi. 69)-

IV. GOSPEL OF LUKE.

Luke was a Gentile by birth, and a physician
(Col. iv. 11, 14), and according to the testimony of
the ancients, a citizen of Antioch, w^here the follow-
ers of Christ were first called christians. He was
acquainted with Greek literature, as is evident from
the style and structure of his two works, the gospel
and book of Acts, and his mode of addressing them
to Theophilus. He became a zealous christian, made
himself familiarly acquainted by personal investiga-
tion (Luke i. 1-4) with all the circumstances attend-
ing the origin of Christianity, diligently studied the
Hebrew scriptures, and was the constant companion
of the apostle Paul.

Of Theophilus, the friend to whom he inscribes
his two works, nothing is known with certainty.
He was probably a Greek who lived out of Palestine,
and perhaps at Antioch, the native city of Luke.

The gospel of Luke was written at about the same
time with that of Mark; and as the latter appears to
have been designed particularly for the Romans, so
the former seems especially adapted to the Greeks.
Luke represents Christ as the Saviour of the world,
without distinction of nations, and traces his gene-
alogy through his mother Mary to Adam, the pro-
genitor of the whole human family; in this particular

128 CHARACTER OF THE GOSPELS.

affording a contrast to the obviously Jewish com-
plexion of the first chapter of Matthew. He is cir-
cumstantial in narrative, gives the dialogues of Christ
with particularity, and is careful to insert geographi-
cal notices of the places in Palestine which he men-
tions (Luke i. 26; iv. 31; viii. 2G; Acts i. 12).

Of all the evangelists he is the only one who gives
a detailed account of the circumstances which pre-
ceded and attended the births of John Baptist and
Jesus; and in this part of his gospel the style is more
strongly Hebraistic than in any other part of the
New Testament, if we except the Apocalypse.
Luke probably copied this narrative and the genealogy
just as he found them in the family of Elizabeth and
Mary.

K''-

V. GOSPEL OF JOHN.

John, the son of Zebedee and Salome, and the
brother of James, w^as born in Bethsaida of Galilee,
the native city of Andrew and Peter (John i. 40;
Matt. iv. 18, 21). From the circumstances, that the
father of John owned vessels on the sea of Galilee,
and had hired servants in his employ; and that his
mother was one of those who provided for the sup-
port of Jesus and purchased costly spices for his em-
balming; and that he had a house in Jerusalem, and
was personally known to the high priest; it is infer-
red that his family w^ere in possession of property,
and of respectable rank. (Compare Mark i. 20; Matt,
xxvii. 56; Luke xxiii. 56; John xix. 27; xviii. 15).
These circumstances of superiority might possibly
have emboldened the mother of James and John to

CHARACTER OF THE GOSPELS. 129

make for them the obnoxious request for precedence
over the other disciples (Matt. xx. 20-24; Mark x.
35). His mother was a devoted follower of Christ,
but nothing is said respecting the religious character
of his father.

He was originally a disciple of John Baptist, and
was among the first to follow Christ (John i. 35).
Having afterwards returned to his business, he was
one of the first whom Jesus called to the apostleship
(Matt. iv. 18, 21). Andrew and Peter, James and
John were the first chosen of the apostles; three ot
them, Peter, James, and John, were selected by Jesus
to witness the glories of his transfiguration (Matt.
xvii. 1 ; Mark v. 37), and the agonies of his humilia-
tion in the garden; two, Peter and John, remained
with him when all the others forsook him and fled
(John xviii, 15); and one only stood by him to the
last and witnessed his death (John xix. 26), and this
one was John; and to him the expiring Jesus afiec-
tionately committed the care of his mother, request-
ing him to discharge towards her the duties of a son.
'Now there stood by the cross of Jesus his
mother and his mother's sister, Mary the wife of
Cleopas, and Mary Magdalene. When Jesus, there-
fore, saw his mother, and the disciple standing by,
whom he loved, he saith unto his mother. Woman,
behold thy son ! Then saith he to the disciple. Be-
hold thy mother! And from that hour that disciple
took her unto his own house.'

Peter and John were first at the tomb of Christ,
after the news of his resurrection (John xx. 2-8)^

130 CHARACTER OF THE GOSPELS.

According to ancient testimony, John was the
youngest of the apostles, and some four or five years
younger than Jesus, and the gospel designates him as
the disciple whom Jesus loved.

He remained at Jerusalem, as Eusebius informs us,
till after the death of Jesus' mother and the impris-
onment of Paul ; when he went to Ephesus, about
A. D. 65, to take charge of the important church
which Paul had established there (Acts xix. 1-20).
Soon after he was banished to Patmos by Domitian
(Rev. i. 9), where he wrote the Apocalypse. In the
reign of Nerva, he was restored to Ephesus, where
he established a theological school, for the purpose
of supplying the numerous churches with competent
pastors, as they could no longer expect the continu-
ance of miraculous qualifications. Hence he receiv-
ed the appellation of the theologian or divine. While
engaged in this employment, he wrote his gospel and
epistles; and in the reign of Trajan, he died a natural
death at a very advanced age., (Eusebius, Eccl. Hist.
book iii. c. 18, 23, 31).

From several instances I'ecorded of him in the
gospels, he seems to have been originally of an im-
petuous and fiery temper, which by the influence of
the christian religion became entirely subdued, and
produced the warmth of affection, that soul-stirring
energy of love, the softness, mildness, and richness of
feeling, which we so much admire in this beloved
apostle (Lukeix. 49,54, 55; Mark iii. 17; ix. 38, 39).

His gospel probably was originally written for the
use of his theological students, and it is equally dis-
tinguished for the childlike simplicity of its language

CHARACTER OF THE GOSPELS. 131

and the depth and pathos of its sentiment. It is sup-
plementary to the others, and consists principally of
the discourses of Jesus, which are characterized by
so great freshness and naturalness, and so strong an
excitement of the most inward emotions, that we are
inclined to believe that they must be given nearly
word for word as they were uttered. The ancients,
on account of these peculiarities, called this the
spiritual gospel] and by a distinguished modern, Er-
nesti, it has been styled the heai^t of Jesus, Though
the most simple in its language, it is the most difficult
of all to be fully comprehended. There is great pe-
culiarity in the use of words, such as lights life, word,
&c., and a depth of meaning which has not often
been fully explored. It is always a favorite book
among those who have full sympathy with the spirit-
uality of the christian religion, but very mystical and
obscure to such as know Christianity only in its forms
and outward precepts.

Chrysostom, in speaking of this gospel, expresses
himself in terms like the following: 'If the spectators
of orators, musicians, and athletes, sit with so great
willingness to see and hear, how great readiness
and zeal should we manifest when, not a musician,
not a sophist, enters the scene, but a man speaking
from the heavens and uttering a voice more majestic
than thunder! For he seizes and holds the world, and
fills it with his tones, not by a loud cry, but by mov-
ing his tongue with divine grace: and what is won-
derful, this voice, though so great, is neither harsh
nor unpleasant, but sweeter, more persuasive, more
enchanting than all the harmony of music; and be-

132 CHARACTER OF THE GOSPELS.

sides all this, most holy and most exciting, full of un-
speakable glories, and conveying so great blessings,
that those who with readiness and diligence receive
and retain them, are no longer like mortal men, nor
do they abide upon earth, but rise above all transi-
tory things, and being transferred to the angelic
inheritance, so inhabit earth as if it were heaven'
(Preface to Homilies on John).

Augustine speaks with equal enthusiasm. 'In the
four gospels, or rather in the four books of the one
gospel, John has not unaptly been compared to the
eagle on account of his etherial intelligence; for he
carries his preaching to a much higher and more sub-
lime elevation than the other three, and in his eleva-
tion wills our hearts also to be raised. The other
three evangelists walked with the Lord as with a man
on earth, and said but little concerning his divinity ;
but John, as if it were irksome to him to remain on
earth, thunders, as it were, in the very beginning of
his gospel, rises not only above the earth and above
the whole circuit of the atmosphere and heavens, but
even above all the hosts of angels, and the whole
order of the invisible powers, and makes his w^ay
directly to him by w^hom all things are done, saying:
" In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was
with God, and the Word was God." The rest of the
gospel corresponds to this great sublimity of its com-
mencement. He freely gave what he had freely
received. For it is not without reason, that it is said
of him in this very gospel, that he leaned on the
breast of the Lord at the last • supper. From that

CHARACTER OF THE GOSPELS. 133

breast he imbibed in secret, and what he had imbibed
in secret he gave out openly.' (Tract, in John, 36).

Origen also says, 'It is not too much to affirm, that
as the gospels are the chief of all writings, so the
gospel of John is the chief of the gospels; but no
one can understand it except by reclining on the
bosom of Jesus; and so far, indeed, he must become
another John, as John by sympathy becomes another
Jesus.' (Com. in John).

But the most characteristic description of the pe-
culiar style of John is by Matthias Claudius, an eccen-
tric German writer. He says, 'It delights me most of
all to read in St. John. There is in him something
so entirely wonderful, twilight and night, and through
it the swiftly darting lightning — a soft evening cloud,
and behind the cloud the broad full moon bodily;
something so deeply, sadly pensive, so high, so full of
anticipation, that one cannot have enough of it. In
reading John, it is with me always as though I saw
him before me, lying on the bosom of his Master, at
the last supper; as though his angel were holding
the light for me, and in certain passages would fall
upon my neck, and whisper something in my ear.

'I am far from understanding every thing w^hich
I read, but it often seems to me as if w^hat John
meant, were floating before me in the distance; and
even where I look into a passage altogether dark, I
have a foretaste of some great, glorious meaning,
which I shall one day understand, and for this reason
I grasp so eagerly after every new interpretation of
the gospel of John. Indeed, the most of them only
frizzle the evening cloud, and the moon behind it
12

134 CHARACTER OF THE GOSPELS.

has quiet rest.' (Claudius's Works, vol. i. p. 9, in
German).

For a very full and beautiful delineation of the
character of John, I refer the reader to the Introduc-
tion of professor Tholuck's Commentary on this
gospel (in German).

VI. RELATION OF THE GOSPELS TO EACH OTHER.

In the four evangelists, we have a fourfold picture
of the Saviour: the same perfect character as it im-
pressed its image on four minds of different structure
and habits; and the picture in each instance receives
a different shade of coloring in consequence of the
particular purpose of each writer.

Matthew developes the character of Christ in the
way best adapted to take hold of the devout Jews,
looking for the hope of their fathers as promised in
the Old Testament. Mark writes for the grave, se-
vere, matter of fact Roman; Luke, for the versatile
and learned Greek, whose eager curiosity could never
sleep — and John, for the deeply reflecting, philosophi-
cal spirit, which feels keenly the want of that which
earth cannot afford, and whose intense desires remain
unsatisfied amid all the physical and intellectual lux-
uries that satiate the rest of mankind. Matthew ex-
hibited the human and subordinate; John, the spirit-
ual and divine of the Redeemer; Mark, his official
character; and Luke, his personal history.

In the four, we have Jesus represented to us as the
Messiah, the Teacher, the Pattern, and the God.
(Compare Olshausen's Introduction to his Commen-
tary on the New Testament, in German).

CHARACTER OF THE GOSPELS. 135

Throughout the bible, God recognizes the princi-
ple of approaching different minds by different means,
and has so arranged his word that no constitutional
peculiarity remains untouched. Whatever may be
your peculiar temperament or habits of mind, in the
bible you will find a Redeemer adapted to your wants,
and a gospel suited to your condition. Try the
character and claims of Jesus by the various and pres-
sing spiritual necessities of men, and see how exactly
he answers to them all ; with what certainty he leads
every variety of character submitted to his direc-
tion towards its own proper perfection; by what ap-
propriate methods he corrects every evil disposition
and soothes every sorrow; how equally he reveals
himself to the most enlightened and the least instruct-
ed of those who make him their Saviour; how uni-
formly all his precepts are fitted to the nature and
condition of men and tend to promote their highest
happiness; how strong a hold he has on the warmest
and most devoted affections of all who choose him
for their friend; with what undeviating confidence
they trust- him, and with what unshaken faith they
preserve the consciousness of his presence and love;
and how this confidence and faith, when regulated by
his instructions, never fails to impart unalloyed im-
provement to the intellect and the affections; how
hope by his influence continues steady through every
kind of worldly trial, and brightens to rapturous
vision when man is called to nature's last struggle —
consider, also, that all this influence has been steadily
increasing from its first commencement, and that the
number, the zeal, the intelligence, and the power of

136 CHARACTER OF THE GOSPELS.

those who act under it, was never so great as at the
present time, and never so rapidly increasing — con-
template all this, as it actually occurs in this cold, sen-
sual world, and awed by a moral miracle more stupen-
dous than the darkness and the earthquake, the rend-
ing rocks and the opening graves of the crucifixion-
day, will you not exclaim with the Roman soldier,
Truly^ this man was the Son of God! (Mark xv. 39).

CHAPTER EIGHTH.

GENUINENESS OF THE APOCALYPSE.

INTRODUCTORY REMARKS.

1 CHOOSE to take up the Apocalypse next to the
gospels, because its genuineness is so frequently
called in question, and without any good reason ; and
because, it being a work of the apostle John, and
exhibiting in a strong light his peculiar characteris-
tics, it should be read in connection with his gospel.

The official activity of John extended through a
much longer period than that of any other of the
primitive teachers of Christianity; for he was the
youngest of the apostles, and reached a far more
advanced age than any of his associates.

On account of his known character as the personal
favorite and bosom friend of his divine Master, the
celebrity of his writings, the extent of his travels
through Christendom, the great age to which he
lived, his being looked up to by all the church for a
long period as the only man living who had seen and
familiarly conversed with Jesus of Nazareth, and on
account of the number of young men who were pre-
12*

138 GENUINENESS OF THE APOCALYPSE.

pared for the christian ministry under his instruc-
tions— on these accounts, John was more exten-
sively known, and more highly venerated among the
christian churches of the first and second century,
than any other apostle, unless Paul should be regard-
ed as an exception.

If, then, the Apocalypse be falsely ascribed to
John, we should naturally suppose that it would not
have been ascribed to him at a very early period;
that very few, if any, of the writers who lived at and
near his time, would be likely to fall into the mistake,
and that in a later age, the book would gradually,
and in the face of opposition from the better inform-
ed, work its way into public confidence, as a genuine
production of the beloved disciple.

But the historical facts in the case are directly
the reverse of all these reasonable expectations,
which every one will see to be exactly in the natural
course of events, on the supposition that the book is
spurious. The testimony of the early and contem-
porary witnesses is unanimous and uncontradicted
in favor of the book. Though well known and ex-
tensively used in the churches, not a breath of sus-
picion was ever blown upon its reputation, till more
than one hundred and fifty years after the death of
the apostle to whom it is ascribed; and then not con-
fidently, but doubtingly, not on any critical grounds
alleged or pretended, but solely on account of the
supposed difficulty of its interpretation, the bad use
which had been made of it, and a dislike to the
doctrines which it was imagined to contain.

GENUINENESS OF THE APOCALYPSE. 139

II. » THE MILLENNIAL CONTROVERSY.

The occasion on which the genuineness of the
Apocalypse was first called in question, was the fol-
lowing. About A. D. 230, Nepos, the pious and ac-
tive bishop of Arsinoe, in Egypt, adopted the notion
of the thousand years personal reign of Christ on
earth, familiarly called the millennium, and published
a book entitled, 'Refutation of the Allegorists,' in
which he amplifies this doctrine, advocating it with
great zeal, and maintaining it principally by quota-
tions from the Apocalypse. The book was very
popular, and gained many adherents to the doctrine,
and so high did their zeal run, that the chiliasts (as
they were called) or the millennialists, began to
secede from the mother church at Alexandria, which
opposed their notions. After the death of Nepos,
Coracion, the pastor of a country church, took
the lead in propagating the same sentiments.
Dionysius, the mild and learned bishop of Alexandria,
desiring to put an end to this dispute, and unwilling
to fulminate ecclesiastical thunders, w^hich he knew
could have no other effect than to irritate, without
intimidating or subduing, went into the province of
Arsinoe, where the seceders were most numerous,
and proposed an amicable conference. They met
him with their leader, Coracion, at their head,
and the book of Nepos was carefully read, and its
arguments examined. The good bishop Dionysius,
w^ith exemplary patience, spent three days in reason-
ing with his wandering sheep, quietly listened to
every thing they had to say, answered all their ob-

140 GENUINENESS OF THE APOCALYPSE.

jections; and by the mildness of his bearing, and the
force of his arguments, so completely satisfied them
that they had been in the wrong, that Coracion, in
the name of all the rest, thanked him for his kindness
and his instructions, and declared that they were all
convinced that he was in the right, and accordingly
they cheerfully renounced their own opinions, and
adopted his. A rare result of theological controversy!
(Neander's Church History, Part i. p. 1094 ff. in
German.)

III. THE APOCALYPSE THEN FIRST QUESTIONED.

This took place A. D. 255, and Dionysius, to se-
cure the victory which he had gained, wrote a work
on the Promises. Notwithstanding his wonderful suc-
cess, the affair had given Dionysius a great deal of
trouble, the whole of which he was disposed to attri-
bute to the influence of the Apocalypse, and began
to doubt whether a book which he supposed had
done so much mischief, could be of divine authority,
or at any rate the production of an apostle. Ac-
cordingly, in his work on the Promises, he expresses
himself to the following effect, namely, ' that some
before his time had rejected the book, alleging that
it was altogether dark, entirely without sense and
reason, and ascribed it to the heretic Cerinthus; that
he, however, would not, himself, presume to reject
it, as many of his christian brethren held it in high
estimation. He acknowledged that he could not
understand the book, yet would not, on that account,
reject it, but would allow that it was written by a
man named John, who was a holy and inspired man.'

GENUINENESS OF THE APOCALYPSE. 141

'But I would not, (says he) easily agree that this was
the apostle, the son of Zebedee, and brother of James,
who is the author of the gospel and general epistles
which bear his name. But I conjecture from the
general tenor of both, and the form and complexion
of the composition, and the execution of the whole
book, that it is not from him.' ' That it is a John that
wrote these things, we must believe him, as he says
it; but what John it is, is uncertain.' ' I am of opin-
ion, that there were many of the same name with
John the apostle, who, for their love and admiration
of him, adopted the same epithet.' ' They say that
there are two monuments at Ephesus, and that each
bears the name of John^ and from the sentiments
and expressions (of the tw^o works in question, the
gospel and Apocalypse) as also from their com-
position, it might be very reasonably conjectured
that this one is different from that' — and -thus he con-
tinues through several paragraphs — saying nothing
directly — denying nothing positively, but exhibiting
great doubt and perplexity. (Eusebius, Eccl. Hist.
Book vii. 25).

This was the first open attack ever made on the
genuineness of the Apocalypse; and it is plain from
the above extracts, that Dionysius could sustain him-
self by no respectable authority, otherwise he would
have produced it; and the 'some before himself to
whom he alludes so generally, were probably those
who had been engaged in the same controversy with
Nepos, and whose minds had received a bias similar
to his own. It is also plain, that he had no historical
ground for his conjectures and suggestions, but that

142 GENUINENESS OF THE . APOCALYPSE.

the testimony was all against him; that he was not
himself at all confident in his own opinion; and that
his wish to get rid of the authority of this book, arose
entirely from his apprehension of its obscurity, and
its influence on the millennial controversy. This con-
troversy continued to prevail through several centu-
ries,particularly in Asia; and wherever it prevailed,
the anti-millennialists felt the same anxiety to rid them-
selves of the authority of the Apocalypse. This
kept up the controversy in regard to the book; and
all who have rejected the book, have been induced to
reject it, not on historical testimony against it, or
the want of such testimony in its favor, but simply
oa doctrinal grounds, as may be seen by every writer
on the subject, from Dionysius, the learned bishop of
Alexandria, down to Gen. Alexander Smythe, the
military polemic of Virginia. But no man who in-
vestigates fairly, will suffer himself to be moved by
such reasonings. The only question with him is,
what is the testimony? What are the facts?

IV. TJSSTJMONY IN FAVOR OF THE BOOK.

Having thus stated the circumstances which first
gave origin to the suspicions, in regard to the Apo-
calypse, and afterwards perpetuated them, we will
now proceed to examine the testimony, and investi-
gate the facts in chronological order.

1 . The writer himself testifies that he is John the
apostle (Rev. i. 1,4, 9; xxi. 2; xxii. 8). No other
John at that period could thus have spoken of him-
self; and this testimony is to be believed, unless there
is something to contradict it.

GENUINENESS OF THE APOCALYPSE. 143

2. Those who were personally acquainted with the
apostle John, testify that he was the author of the
Apocalypse.

Irenaeus, who was educated in Asia Minor, under
Polycarp and Papias (who had studied theology
under John himself) established himself as a mission-
ary at Lyons in France, A. D. 150. In his work
against heretics (Book v. 30) speaking of Rev. xiii.
1 8, where some read the number six hundred and six-
teen, instead of the usual reading six hundred and
sixty six, he says it ought to be read six hundred and
sixty six, ' this number being placed in all the ancient,
most approved writings; they also giving the same
testimony who had seen John face to face' (Euseb.
Eccl. Hist. V. 8). Irenaeus had been well acquaint-
ed with these men who had seen John, for they were
his own teachers. No contrary contemporary testi-
mony can be adduced. Could the Apocalypse have
been so soon forged, so soon ascribed to John, so
soon have gained general credence, while John was
yet living, and among his personal friends? How
could Polycarp and Papias have consulted John as
to the reading of a passage in a work which he
never wrote, and w^hich was falsely ascribed to him,
without detecting its spuriousness?

3. The testimony of all who lived in the generation
immediately succeeding the apostles.

Justin Martyr, born at Samaria about A. D. 110,
in a dialogue with Trypho, the Jew, says: 'a certain
man among us whose name was John, one of the
apostles of Christ, in a revelation made to him, pro-
phesied that those who believed in our Christ, should

144 GENUINENESS OF THE APOCALYPSE.

be a thousand years in Jerusalem' (Dial, with Trypho,
c. 71). Melito, bishop of Sardis, one of the churches
to which the Apocalypse was directed (Rev. iii.) re-
ceived the Revelation as genuine, and wrote a com-
mentary^upon it (Euseb. Hist. iv. 26.)

Theophilus, A. D. 168, bishop of Antioch, where
the disciples were first called christians, also received
the Revelation as genuine, making use of it as
of the other scriptures, in a work of his against
the heretic Hermogenes. (Euseb. Eccl. Hist. iv. 24).
Apollonius, in the latter part of the second cen-
tury, a presbyter at Ephesus, one of the churches
to which the Apocalypse was directed (Rev. ii.
1), and where the apostle John spent all the lat-
ter part of his life, and where an imposition of the
kind would be most easily detected, in a work against
the Phrygian heresy, quotes the Revelation of John
as testimony (Euseb. v. 18). To these may be add-
ed Methodius, bishop of Tyre; and there is no coun-
ter testimony, no balancing of evidence, for the
evidence is all on one side.

In Egypt, Clemens of Alexandria, about 1 90 A.
D. gives the same testimony (Paed. ii. 12; Strom.
vi. 13).

At Carthage, TertuUian, the celebrated christian
lawyer, born A. D. 160, says:

' Marcion, indeed, rejects the Revelation, but the
whole series of bishops from the beginning, will
stand for John as the author (adv. Marcion iv. 5).

Irenaeus, a part of whose testimony has already
been given, is thus quoted by Eusebius (Eccl. Hist.
V. 8). 'Afterwards John, the disciple of our Lord,

GENUINENESS OF THE APOCALYPSE. 146

the same that lay upon his bosom, published the
gospel, while he was yet at Ephesus in Asia.' 'And a
little further on he speaks of the same John': "We,
therefore," says he, "do not venture to affirm any
thing with certainty respecting the name of Anti-
Christ. For were it necessary that his name should
be clearly announced to the present age, it would
have been declared by him who saw the Revelation.
For it has not been long since it was seen, but almost
in our own generation, about the end of Domitian's
reign." 'These are what he states respecting the
Revelation.' (Compare Lardner's Works, 8vo. edit,
vol. 2. p. 170-182).

Origen, the great christian teacher of this period,
and preceptor of Dionysius,says, that John wrote also
the Apocalypse, in which he was commanded to be
silent, and not record the voice of the seven thunders:
thus referring to one of the most striking passages of
the book. (Euseb. Eccl. Hist. vi. 25).

Indeed, the testimony, till we come to Dionysius,
is unanimous, and we have already seen w^hat induc-
ed him to call in question the authority of the book,
and how doubtingly and lamely he apologizes for so
doing.

Eusebius, the celebrated ecclesiastical historian in
the reign of Constantine, who was inclined to follow
the opinion of Dionysius, has the following sentences
in reference to this topic:

' The Apocalypse of John may, if it be thougbl
proper, be classed with the undisputed books.'

' We may also class the Apocalypse of John among

13

146 GENUINENESS OF THE APOCALYPSE.

the disputed books, which some, as I have stated,
reject, and others class with the undisputed books.'

'Respecting the Apocalypse, many are fluctuating
in their opinion.' (Eccl. Hist. iii. 24, 25).

Jerome, the great biblical scholar of the fourth cen-
tury, in his epistle to Dardanus, remarks, that con-
trary to the prevailing custom of the Greek church
in that age, he received the Apocalypse, following
the authority of the ancient writers; thus showing the
fact, that the rejection of the Apocalypse was
comparatively recent, and uncountenanced by an-
cient testimony. (Compare Eichhorn on Apocalypse,
Praef. p. xlv. xlvi).

Other testimony of the same kind might be adduc-
ed; but this, I trust, is sufficient to establish the point
in question: namely, that as far as direct testimony
goes, no ancient book can lay claim to more than
what is found in favor of the Revelation of John.

V. OBJECTIONS TO THE APOCALYPSE.

Let us turn our attention to the objections to its
authenticity, which some regard of sufficient weight
to counterbalance the whole force of this concurrent
and uncontradicted testimony of the ancients.

1. It was conjectured by Dionysius, as you have
already seen, that the Apocalypse was written, not
by John the apostle, but by a certain presbyter named
John, who lived at Ephesus about the same time.

To this, we reply, 1st. It is directly contrary to all
contemporary and early testimony. The writers of
the first age knew of no such presbyter John, but
ascribed the Apocalypse to John the apostle. 2d.

GENUINENESS OF THE APOCALYPSE. 147

The very existence of any such John the presbyter,
as a different person from John the apostle, is very
problematical. He makes no figure in ecclesiastical
history, and v^^e are strongly tempted to believe, that
he vi^as manufactured for the occasion by those who
w^ished to get rid of the apostolic authority of the
Apocalypse.

The apostle John styles himself the elder or pres-
byter in the first verse of his second and third epis-
tles, and this might first have given rise to the story
of tv^^o Johns at Ephesus. Eusebius infers and
stoutly argues in favor of a presbyter John, distinct
from the apostle, from the fact that the name of John
tw^ice occurs in the follovi^ing passage of Papias, in
wrhich he says that he made it a point to inquire
'what was said by Thomas, James, John, Matthew,
or any other of the disciples of our Lord. What
was said by Aristion, and the presbyter John, disci-
ple of our Lord' (Euseb. iii. 39). Whether the pres-
byter John here mentioned, be th^ same with John
the apostle, or John whose surname was Mark (Acts
xii. 25), or some other John, it certainly cannot
prove, in direct opposition to all testimony, that John
the apostle did not write the Apocalypse.

2. Another objection of Dionysius, and one which
has been often repeated since, is, that John's name is
affixed to the Apocalypse, which is not the case with
his gospel or first epistle. This is a very singular
argument; as much as to say, if a man publishes one
work anonymously, and another with his name to it,
we are to reject the one which bears his name, be-
cause the other is anonymous.

148 GENUINENESS OF THE APOCALYPSE.

Again: though the apostle John does not describe
himself by name, to be the writer of the gospel, yet
he does declare himself to be the author in terms
so express, that he well knew any one would under-
stand them (John xxi. 24 compared with verse 20»
and xiii. 23-25, and xix. 35).

The nature of the Apocalypse, it being prophecy
in the most sublime style of inspiration, required a
more distinct enunciation of its author to give it au-
thority, than the plain narrative of the gospeL This
is according to the analogy of other prophecies^
Not a single prophecy occurs in the Old Testament,,
which is not accompanied by the name of the writer*
John w^hile prophesying, of course, adopted the
prophetic mode of writing.

3.. The style and language of the Apocalypse is
very different from that of the gospel and epistles*
This is true, and the style ought to be different; for
the whole subject and the whole mode of treating it
is entirely different. Style varies with the varieties
of the subject. Is the genuineness of Milton's Para-
dise Lost to be disputed, because it is not written in
the same style with his Doctrine and Discipline of
Divorce? Or Newton's works on Chronology and
the Bible, because they were not in the style of his
Principia? There is, however, a striking resemblance
in some particulars, between the style of the Apo-^
calypse and that of the gospel. There is the same
depth and peculiarity of feeling in both.

4. It is objected that the Greek of the Apocalypse
is much less pure and more largely tinctured with
Hebrew idioms than that of the gospel or epistles^

GENUINENESS OF THE APOCALYPSE. 149

This is true, and for the best of reasons. The Apo-
calypse was written in the reign of Domitian, earlier
than the gospel or epistles, and before the writer
had become so familiar with the Greek language as
he was afterwards. Again, almost every sentence
in the Apocalypse is written with particular refer-
ence to some passage of the Old Testament prophe-
cies, and of course it takes a Hebrew coloring. We
are led to think that the apostle had no book with
him in his exile and solitude but his Hebrew bible;
that this was his constant meditation, and the whole
train of his thoughts was shaped and modified by its
language and imagery.

5. It is said that the Apocalypse is not included
in the most ancient Syrian translation. It is true,
that some of the manuscripts of the Syrian transla-
tion which have been brought to Europe, do not
contain this book. But that the book was well
known and acknowledged as genuine in the Syrian
churches, is evident from the fact, that in the second
century it was quoted as scripture by Theophilus
bishop of Antioch. In the early par.t of the third
century its genuineness was vindicated against the
attacks of Caius by Hippoly tus, who was held in high
repute by the Syrians; and in the fourth century it
is quoted as the work of John, by the Syrian saint,
Ephraim. (Works of Ephr. t. ii. p. 332; iii. 616:
and in Greek, ii. 252; iii. 52).

The Syrian manuscripts which do not contain the
books, were probably written after the millennial con-
troversy had made the Revelation distasteful to a
powerful party in the church.
13*

450 GENUINENESS OF THE APOCALYPSEr

6. But the great, and in fact, the only objection''
against the Revelation, which has had any real im-
portance, has always been that which was at first
stated by Dionysius, namely, that it was very obscure^
without sense and reason, as Dionysius says, exceed-
ingly difficult to be interpreted; and the great store-
house from which heretics and fanatics have drawn
their materials to trouble the church with. The
want of ' sense and reason' belongs to the interpre-
ters, and not to the book. Obscurity, to a certain
extent, is an attribute of all prophecy, and heretics
and fanatics, always lay hold on the most highly fig-
urative language, because this is the most easily per-
verted. Even allowing the objection to be just as it
is stated, it has but little to do with the question of
authorship, which is a question of fact, to be settled
by the appropriate evidence; and no one has ever
shown, or done any thing towards showing, that
there is any thing in the Revelation so repugnant to
the known character of John, that he cannot reason-
ably be supposed the author of it. A writer is not
accountable for the stupidity of his commentators,
nor for the ignorance or wilful abuse, which weak
men or bad men may make of his writings, I hope
that the next chapter will show, that the darkness,
the absurdities, the mysticism, and fanaticism, which
have been attributed to the Apocalypse, no more
belong to it, than dinginess belongs to the clear blue
sky, when it happens to be observed through a dingy
glass.

I have been thus particular in stating the whole
argument, in respect to the genuineness of the Reve-

GENUINENESS OF THE APOCALYPSE. 151

lation, for the purpose of exposing the recklessness
with which half-learned and flippant criticism fre-
quently makes assertions, and the easy credulity
with which they are believed. If the facts are not
as I have stated them, let the contrary be shown. I
know that the contrary cannot be shown. The book
has been grossly abused, and because abused, it has
come to be suspected — and by many despised. The
WTiter of the book seemed to anticipate this from the
ever active depravity of man, and therefore, sol-
emnly pronounces a curse on any one who should
add to or take from the book (Rev. xxii. 18, 19).
How many commentators will fall under this curse,
particularly the curse for adding!

In concluding this chapter I would say to my read-
ers, take the book of Revelation, and read it once
through without reference to any thing which you
have ever heard said about it, and without attempting-
to apply its predictions to any of the events of histo-
ry, with which you are familiar. Read it simply for
the sake of enjoying it ; read it as a glowing description
of a series of magnificent pictures which were pass-
ing before the eye of the writer; read it for the sake
of throwing your soul into its sublime acts of adora-
tion of the Great Supreme; read it for the sake of
becoming endued with its spirit, without troubling
yourselves, as to the historical application of its sym-
bols; and remember, while you read, that it is an
Oriental, an Asiatic, and a Hebrew book. (On the
subject of this chapter, compare particularly the
Introductions of Michaelis, Hug, and Home).

CHAPTER NINTH.

INTERPRETATION OF THE APOCALYPSE.

I. GENERAL DESIGN OF THE BOOK.

When we enter on the investigation of a much
disputed subject, it is very desirable to find some
common ground on which all can agree to stand, and
from which we may take our departure. Such a
common ground w^e have, even in reference to the
interpretation of the Apocalypse.

Almost all interpreters agree substantially in this:
namely, that it is the general object of this book to
excite and encourage christians in times of depres-
sion and persecution, by disclosing to them the glo-
ries and the terrors of the invisible world; to show
the dreadfulness of the punishments which await the
enemies of religion, and the nearness and delight of
the rewards which await its friends; and to assure
those who are exposing themselves to suffering in the
cause of Christ, of the ultimate and complete triumph
of this cause over every form of hostility, however
malignant and powerful. This was its original and
acknowledged purpose, and this purpose it has abun-
dantly answered in every age of the church, notwith-

INTERPRETATION OF THE APOCALYPSE. 153

Standing the numerous abuses to which it has been
subjected. And this is an instance of the care
which God takes to secure the original end, for which
his institutions are designed. Notwithstanding all
the abuses of this book, the church in times of dis-
tress has alw^ays used it, as it was designed to be
used, for comfort and encouragement.

Diversity of opinion has arisen in making the ap-
plication of its symbolic language, to particular
events of subsequent history; and the diversity has
been as endless as the varieties of fancy and passion
among men; and the difficulty and obscurity which
envelope the book, arise from its being read with the
idea that each of its symbols must be appropriated
to some one corresponding event of history; and
that the book is valuable only as a collection of pre-
dictions, which have had, or are to have, punctual
and literal accomplishment.

That the book contains much of prophecy, there
can be no doubt; but I apprehend that the idea of
prophecy as applied to the Revelation is generally
too literal and narrow ; that the constant and anxious
search for the fulfilment of predictions has often pre-
vented readers from seeing that the book contains
much, of the highest value to the christian, which is
not prophecy.

It is desirable often to read the book, and leave
the prophetic application of its symbols entirely out
of view, and look at the passages just as they stand —
living pictures of eternal realities, which are invisi-
ble to mortal eyes — and endeavor, at the same time,
to unfold their more striking peculiarities, and to

154 INTERPRETATION OF THE APOCALYPSE.

trace their connection with the prophetic poetry of
the Old Testament.

II. PLAN AND CONTENTS OP THE BOOK.

The Apocalypse is remarkable for the complete-
ness and consistency of its plan, and the accuracy
and care with which this plan is filled out in the exe-
cution of the work. One distinguished writer (Eich-
horn) has even regarded it as a drama, and as such,
has divided it into the requisite number of acts and
scenes, which, though undoubtedly foreign to the
intention of the writer, correspond exactly to the
contents of the book. The book is entirely an Asiatic
production and corresponds to the Asiatic taste ; and
its symbolical language is derived principally from
the Old Testament prophecies, modified and or-
namented according to the genius and purposes
of the writer. I am aware of the difliculty of at-
tempting a satisfactory outline of the plan and con-
tents of such a work; but some outline is necessary
in order to show the ground on which we make the
prophetic application of the symbols.

I. Vision of the Redeemer in the isle of Patmos,
with seven epistles to the seven Asiatic churches

(i-iii).

II. Scene changes to heaven. Vision of the throne
of God, with the surrounding worshippers — the book
with seven seals — the Lamb, and preparation for the
great events to follow, by the opening of' the first
six seals (iv-vii).

III. The seventh seal opened — all heaven is silent
— seven angels appear with seven trumpets, and by

INTERPRETATION OF THE APOCALYPSE. 155

seven blasts of the trumpets, the great city spiritually
called Sodom and Egypt is destroyed (viii-xi).

IV. Vision of the woman and her child, for whose
destruction a dragon is watching (xii).

V. Vision of the monster rising out of the sea —
of the Lamb, with his elect, on mount Zion — the
proclamation of the three angels, and the destruction
of the monster by the seven angels pouring out seven
vials (xiii-xvi).

VI. Vision of a woman on a scarlet colored beast,
occupying the place of the marine monster — her city,
Babylon, destroyed — lamentation on earth — triumph
and exultation in heaven (xviii-xix. 10).

VII. Vision of the victorious Word, the King of
kings, with new conflicts and final success (xix.
11-21).

VIII. Satan bound — a time of peace — new strug-
gles, and a complete and final victory, and the sub-
sequent judgment (xx).

IX. Vision of the New Jerusalem descending from
heaven, and the glories of the heavenly world (xxi.-
xxii. 5).

X. Closing address of the angel to the writer, and
of the writer to the reader (xxii. 6-21.)

The above is a brief view of the principal divisions
and the contents of the book as I understand it. The
following more extended analysis is drawn up ac-
cording to the views of professor Hug, in his Intro-
duction to the New Testament (vol. ii. p. 598 ff, in
German).

156 INTERPRETATION OF THE APOCALYPSE.

Part I.

In exile on the island of Patmos, while worship-
ing on the Lord's day, the apostle John, rapt into
prophetic ecstacy, sees a human form, resplendent
with heavenly glory, walking among seven golden
candlesticks. It is the Lord, and he directs the be-
loved disciple to write seven epistles to the seven
Asiatic churches, who are represented by the seven
candlesticks, and watched over by seven angels,
represented by seven stars glittering upon his fight
hand. These epistles commend the virtues and re-
buke the failings of the seven churches — exhort some
to perseverance and others to repentance (i.-iii).
Part II.

This happened on earth — but the door of heaven
is now thrown open, and a herald calls on John to
ascend. He there sees God upon a throne, surround-
ed with the glories of heaven, and about him four
and twenty of his chosen upon as many thrones.
He holds in his hands a scroll sealed with seven seals,
and no created being in the universe has power to
break them or read the book. But a lamb is seen in
the midst of the throne, and amid the hymns and
acclamations of the world of spirits he rises to open
the seals (iv.-v).

When the first seal is broken, a hero is seen with
the insignia of victory; when the second is broken,
peace departs from the earth; at the third, famine
appears; at the fourth, death and his ghastly retinue.
At the opening of the fifth seal, the blood of the
martyrs cries out for vengeance; at the sixth, the
sun and moon are darkened, the stars fall from

INTERPRETATION OF THE APOCALYPSE. 157

heaven, fear and distress are universal. Four angels
hold back the storms, till an angel, who comes from
the east, has affixed the seal of the living God to
twelve thousand out of every one of the Israelitish
tribes, who are to be delivered from the impending
calamities. About the throne of God there is now
seen a multitude from all nations, in white robes with
palm branches in their hands, who have escaped from
the abodes of misery and persecution, and are now
shouting the praises of God, their deliverer (vi.-vii).

The seventh seal is opened — all heaven is silent in
anxious suspense — and seven angels appear with
seven trumpets. The prayers of the saints lie upon
the altar before God, and ascend up to him in a cloud
of incense (viii. 1-6).

Part. III.

The first of the seven angels sounds his trumpet,
and fire, hail, and blood fall to the earth. At the
sound of the second trumpet, a burning mountain
falls into the sea, and the third part of its waters be-
come blood. The third trumpet sounds, and a spark-
ling star is thrown upon the third part of the rivers
and springs, and the waters are embittered by it.
The fourth trumpet sounds, and a third part of the
sun, moon, and stars are darkened. An eagle [angel]
flies through heaven, and cries 'wo, wo, wo to
the inhabitants of the earth.' The blast of the fifth
trumpet is heard, and a star with the key of the
abyss descends from heaven. The bottomless pit is
opened, and destructive insects fly from it in every
direction.

158 INTERPRETATION OF THE APOCALYPSE.

At the sound of the sixth trumpet, the four angels
bound at the Euphrates are let loose, and the third
part of men perish in war; but the survivors harden
themselves in their sins and refuse to repent (viii.-ix.)

An angel of colossal stature shouts with a voice of
seven thunders, and reaches to John a scroll which
he is directed to swallow. He swallows it and be-
gins to prophesy. He measures the nave of the
temple, but leaves the outer court and the city to be
trampelled upon by the enemy. Two martyrs, who
are mentioned with loud eulogies, are directed to
prophesy, and they are slain in the allegorical Sodom
— the tenth part of the city falls by an earthquake —
seven thousand men are slain.

The seventh trumpet sounds, and the four and
twenty elders fall down before the throne of God,
and sing a song of victory (x.-xi.)
Part IV.

A woman is now seen in heaven, clothed with the
sun, the moon under her feet, and upon her head a
diadem of stars, in the pains of childbirth. A dragon
prowls before her to destroy her infant child, who is
destined to rule all nations; but Michael hurls the
dragon to the earth, and heaven again resounds with
the shouts of victory. He still persecutes the wo-
man; but she escapes to a distant solitude where her
child is nurtured in safety. The foiled dragon now
wages war with the woman's friends (xii.-xiii).
Part V.

In the mean time a monster has arisen out of the
sea, with seven heads, ten horns, and ten royal dia-
dems. He wages war with the saints; the nations

INTERPRETATION OF THE APOCALYPSE. 159

do him homage. Another monster arises from the
earth with two horns, and speaks like* a dragon. He
subjects men to the power of the marine monster,
causes an image of him to be made, and compels the
world to worship it. He then marks the worshippers
with a peculiar mark. The marine monster has the
number 666 (xiii).

The Lamb is now seen standing on mount Sion,
surrounded by the faithful, bearing the name of God
in their foreheads, and singing praises to their Re-
deemer (xiv. 1-5).

Three angels appear in heaven. One carries the
everlasting gospel; the second cries: ' Babylon is fal-
len'; and the third proclaims vengeance on those who
have worshipped the image of the beast. Upon a
cloud is seen a human figure with a sickle in his hand,
and an angel with another sickle — one gathers the har-
vest, the other the vintage (xiv).
Part VI.

Seven angels with seven vials now come out of the
tabernacle of God, which is enveloped in a thick
cloud of vapor. The first angel pours out his vial,
and 'a noisome and grievous sore' falls upon the
worshippers of the beast. The second vial is emp-
tied upon the sea, and it is* curdled with clotted
blood. The third is poured upon the rivers and wells,
which immediately flow with blood. The fourth is
poured upon the sun, and men are scorched with
burning heat; the fifth is emptied on the throne of
the beast, and it is wrapt in darkness. The sixth
angel pours his vial on the Euphrates, and its foun-
tains are sealed up. The seventh empties his into

160 INTERPRETATION OF THE APOCALYPSE.

the air, and a voice sounds from the sanctuary of
God in heaven, ' It is done.' All nature is in com-
motion— every thing frightful and desolating com-
bines to complete the work of v^^o (xvi).

One of the seven angels now conducts John into
a wilderness, and shows him a woman sitting upon a
scarlet beast with seven heads and ten horns. She
has the name of Babylon upon her forehead, is drunk
with the blood of saints, and seduces the nations to
licentiousness (xvii).

Another angel descends from heaven, proclaims
the destruction of Babylon, and summons the people
to take vengeance. On earth the voice of lamenta-
tion for Babylon is heard, but heaven resounds with
hallelujahs (xviii.-xix.)

Part VII.

The conqueror now appears on a white horse, his
name is engraved upon his armor — he is the king of
kings — the Word of God. An angel standing in the
sun beckons the fowls of heaven to the battle-field,
where the corpses of princes and beasts are lying in
great numbers; for their last efforts at resistance
had failed (xix).

Meanwhile an angel descends from heaven with
the key of the abyss, and chains the hostile dragon
and confines him in that prison for a thousand years,
during which time the saints reign with Jesus. Af-
ter this respite the battle is resumed, and distant na-
tions are called into the field. But in vain; the dra-
gon is again defeated, and consigned to the torture of
eternal fire. The judge ascends his throne — the
universe trembles with agitation — the book of life is

INTERPRETATION OF THE APOCALYPSE. 161

unrolled — the graves give up their dead — the final
sentence is pronounced (xx).

New heavens and a new earth take the place of
the old; a new Jerusalem ornamented like a bride
descends from heaven; its walls, its towers, its royal
palace adorned with the insignia of Christianity.
There is comfort, quiet, peace, eternal light, the king-
dom of God (xxi.-xxii. 6).

The closing address of John to the reader (xxii).

In studying the book, the reader will notice the
frequent use of the number seven. Throughout the
bible, seven is a sacred number. The seventh day was
the Sabbath; the seventh year, sabbatical year; seven
times seventh, or forty ninth year, grand sabbatical
year. The feasts continued seven days; seven ani-
mals w^ere sacrificed; seven lamps to the candlestick;
seven priests with seven trumpets went around Jeri-
cho seven days, and on the seventh, seven times
seven. So in the Apocalypse, there are seven
churches, seven candlesticks, seven spirits, seven
stars, seven seals, seven trumpets, seven thunders,
seven vials, seven plagues, seven angels, &:c.

Iir. PROPHETIC APPLICATION OF THE BOOK.

This whole book, with its names and imagery, is
manifestly symbolical. Thus in ii. 6, 14, 20, Nicolai-
tans or Balaamites designate selfish and money-lov-
ing ecclesiastics; Jezebel, a noisy, licentious woman,
&c.

In the book, two cities are represented as being
destroyed, and a third is established on their ruins.
14*

162 INTERPRETATION OF THE APOCALYPSE.

The first, Sodom, is clearly pointed out to be*
Jerusalem, xi, 1, 2, 8, by the mention of the temple^
and the holy city — 'where also our Lord was cruci-
fied.' The seven trumpets, therefore, and chapters
viii.-ix. clearly refer to Jerusalem, or Jewish institu-
tions. This we are sure of on critical grounds.

The second city, Babylon, is clearly pointed out to
be Rome (xiii. 18; xvii. 9, 18). Six hundred and
sixty six (666) is the sum of the numerals in the
Greek word, A«7i»r9s {lateinos) meaning Roman; and
the city on seven hills, which then ruled over the
kings of the earth,' could be no other than Rome.
The seven vials, therefore, and chapters xiii.-xviii,
plainly refer to Rome, or Roman institutions. This,
also, we are sure of on critical grounds. The third
city, established on the ruins of the two former, is
the New Jerusalem, which descends from God out of
heaven (xxi. 2). From this fact, we are also sure on
critical grounds, that this third city must be sym-
bolical, and not literal; and we are led to infer that
the other two also are symbolical, and not literal.

The circumstances in which the author wrote, the
purpose for which he wrote, and the whole structure
of the work show, that the three cities are symbolical
of the three religions then contending for supremacy;
the first two of which were united against the last,
that is. Paganism and Judaism were united against
Christianity.

The general subject of the prophecy, then, is the
destruction of the two great antagonist powers of
Christianity, persecuting Judaism and persecuting
Paganism, and the triumph, and finally complete

INTERPRETATION OF THE APOCALYPSE. 163

establishment of the religion of Christ over the whole
world.

In accordance with the genius of prophecy, a full
picture is given of the present condition of things,
and the most prominent and characteristic points of
the future, are hastily, but clearly sketched. Accord-
ing to this view, I would arrange the book in reference
to its prophetic application, as follows:

I. Introduction, the seven epistles to the seven
churches (i.-iii).

II. Preparation for the great events to follow —
seven seals (iv.-vii).

III. Sodom or Jerusalem, representing Judaism,
destroyed by a series of calamities — seven trumpets,
(viii.-xi).

IV. Birth of Christianity, the child of uncorrupted
Judaism, and preservation of the infant from destruc-
tion, by the special interposition of Heaven (xii).

V. Babylon or Rome, (in its first form as a marine
monster) persecuting Paganism, destroyed by a series
of calamities — seven vials (xiii.-xvi).

In this series, there seems to be a distinct allusion
to Mohamedanism, a compound of Judaism and Pa-
ganism, which, under the Saracenic power, overthrew
Christianity in the East, and for a long time held it
in check and nearly destroyed it in Europe (xvi.
12-21).

VI. Babylon in another form; the Papal despotism,
a compound of Paganism and Christianity. Babylon
finally and completely destroyed; conflicts and vic-
tories succeeding the reformation (xvii.-xix).

164 INTERPRETATION OF THE APOCALYPSE.

VII. The millennium; another hostile power still
future; the final victory and the last judgment (xv.)

VIII. Final and complete triumph of Christianity,
and the consummation of its glory in the heavenly
world (xxi.-xxii).

The symbols of this book are not to be forced to
an application to particular historical events, except-
ing as these events are the causes or the consequences
of great religious changes. Classes of events, ar-
ranged according to their religious influence on man,
are represented by the symbols, rather than particu-
lar historical circumstances; and much is added for
the ornamenting and completing of the picture. The
book is neither a civil nor an ecclesiastical history of
Europe or Asia, but a book of excitement and en-
couragement and assurance of final success, to those
who are laboring to advance the cause of truth and
righteousness in opposition to error and sin.

This mode of interpretation corresponds to the
times and circumstances in which the book was
written, fulfils all the conditions of its language, ac-
cords with the analogy of prophecy, elicits a full and
consistent meaning, and is liable to no critical ob-
jections. This mode of interpretation rests on crit-
ical grounds, and not on theological conjecture; it
enables us to understand the book strictly by the
common laws of interpretation, without an applica-
tion of its symbols to any events of history, which
may happen to strike the fancy or suit the present
purposes of the interpreter; a practice which more
than any thing else has contributed to make the Apo-
calypse, to the majority of readers, a book of riddles

INTERPRETATION OF THE APOCALYPSE. 165

and inexplicable enigmas. Let any one carefully
read the book with these great landmarks in his eye,
and I venture to predict, that he will see order aris-
ing out of apparent confusion, and light from seem-
ing darkness.

The destruction of the two great powers, hostile
to Christianity in the time of John, was the sign and
pledge of the overthrow of all other hostile powers,
and the final judgment upon the wicked world.
Where one event is thus taken as the sign and pledge
of another, they are both often predicted in the
same connection, and language used in reference to
both, which cannot be applied in its full extent of
meaning to either separately. (See p. 30). This is
agreeable to the analogy of all the prophecies of the
Old Testament; and in accordance with this princi-
ple, Christ himself has taught us to regard the de-
struction of Jerusalem as the sign and pledge of the
final judgment (Matt. xxv. xxvi).

IV. GENERAL REMARKS ON PROPHECY.

Prophecy, in some circumstances, was given in
words or narrative, but generally by symbols or vis-
ions passing before the eyes of the prophet* These
symbols, or visions, were sometimes plain of them-
selves, but usually they required some explanation,
which was given by soliloquies and songs and conver-
sations, among the inhabitants of the heavenly world;
or communicated by some heavenly messenger
directly to the prophet himself.

For example, in Ezekiel viii. a series of visions
passes before the eyes of the prophet, which are plain

166 INTERPRETATION OF THE APOCALYPSE.

of themselves and need no explanation ; but in Zech-
ariah iv. the prophet understands not what he sees,
and accordingly asks and receives an explanation.
The examples of prophecy by v^ords or narrative are
too numerous to need particular reference. Compare,
however, Amos vi. 8-12, where there is a very im-
impressive prophetic description of a destructive
pestilence.

The subjects of prophecy are of two kinds.

I. Sometimes a change in the moral and religious
principles of men is predicted, and this change repre-
sented under various symbols, but without particular
reference to the historical circumstances under which
such changes shall occur. Such are the prophecies
of Isaiah, respecting the universal prevalence of
peace and true religion (Is. ii. 2-4; Ixvi. 17-25, and
other passages).

In the examination of such prophecies, we are not
to look for particular historical circumstances, an-
swering to the symbols of the prophecy, but for a
corresponding moral and religious condition of man-
kind, under whatever historical circumstances. The
predictions of the Apocalypse are mostly of this
kind; they have reference to the prevalence of certain
principles and the displacement of certain opposing
principles, rather than to occurrences in the polit-
ical world; and hence the impropriety of forcing all
its symbols to a strictly historical application, and
the confusion resulting from this attempt. Neither
paganism nor popery are as yet entirely destroyed;
consequently the prediction respecting them is not
yet entirely accomplished, but is still in the process

INTERPRETATION OF THE APOCALYPSE. 167

of accomplishment. Strict chronological order is
not aimed at in these predictions. The great promi-
nent points are clearly exhibited, enough is given for
the comfort and confidence of the faithful, enough for
warning to the wicked, enough for complete moral
effect; and this is all that God designs to accomplish
by prophecy of this kind.

II. Again: sometimes prophecy has reference to
particular historical events; and in such cases, the
language of the prediction is found to correspond
exactly with all the minute circumstances of the
event.

Such are the predictions in Deuteronomy respect-
ing the future condition of the Jews; in Isaiah, Jere-
miah, and Ezekiel, respecting Egypt, Tyre, and Baby-
Ion; respecting the Messiah, &c. The nature and
the utility of this kind of prophecy will be more fully
considered in the next chapter.

Note. — On the subject of the preceding chapter, the reader
may find much valuable information in the treaties on the
Apocalypse by Eichhorn and Herder in Latin and German,
and Lowman and Woodhouse in English.

CHAPTER TENTH.

HEBREW AND PAGAN PROPHETS CONTRASTED.

I. INTRODUCTORY REMARKS.

In connection with the Apocalypse, which is the
only expressly prophetical book of the New Testa-
ment, we will offer a few observations on the general
subject of biblical prophecy. A course of thought,
like the following, frequently tends to counteract in
some minds the authority of prophecy, namely, that
all ages have their prophets, and that the Hebrews,
in this respect, were not distinguished from the Pa-
gan nations of antiquity; but that as nations became
more enlightened, prophets became less frequent,
and finally entirely ceased.

It is true, that all early nations have had their
prophets; but the affirmative to the question, have
there been false prophets? is not of course the nega-
tive to the question, have there been true prophets'?
Rather, the universality of the false proves the neces-
sity and actual existence of the true; for there is
no feeling of human nature so universal as that
which induces all men in every age to look for

HEBREW AND PAGAN PROPHETS. I 69

prophecy, which has not something in the arrange-
ments of the God of nature to correspond to it. That
disposition to worship, which so universally leads
uninstructed nations to idolatry, proves that the
necessity of religion is founded deep in human nature,
and is a strong presumptive argument that there is a
true religion adapted to this want of the human soul,
and a true God worthy of the love and homage of
man. The eye presupposes light, the sense of smell
fragrance; and every natural desire has in nature its
appropriate object of gratification.

The question is not, whether there have been
prophets among the pagan nations? but whether the
prophets of the heathen and of the bible are alike?
or whether the difference between them is so great
as to render it impossible to ascribe their prophetic
power to the same source?

The bible continually and earnestly asserts that
there is a difference, and that this difference is so
marked, that no one who has had opportunity for
observing, is excusable for confounding the one with
the other. Let us look at the matter as it actually
existed.

II. HEBREW AND PAGAN RELIGIONS.

The Hebrews were the only people of the ancient
world who acknowledged and worshipped one spiri-
tual God, the Creator and Ruler of the universe.
To sustain their attachment to this simple and pure
faith in the midst of surrounding idolatry, there ex-
isted among them, in addition to the Levites who
were set apart for the same purpose, an order of men
15

170 HEBREW AND PAGAN PROPHETS.

called prophets, to whom the will of their God was
supposed to be made known by immediate revelation.
It was their business to encourage the people in
their obedience to the divine law, to instruct them
when they erred, and to warn them when they went
astray. In order to prove the validity of their claim
to divine inspiration, they professed to predict future
events which no human sagacity could foresee, and
to work miracles which no human power could
effect.

The surrounding nations worshipped idols, and
they also had prophets who professed to be inspired
by those false deities. The Gentiles all acknowledged
the God of the Hebrews to be really a God, and
their prophets to be truly prophets; but the differ-
ence consisted in this, that while the Hebrews affirm-
ed their God to be the only true God, and their
prophets the only true prophets, the Gentiles merely
claimed that their gods were equal to Jehovah, and
their prophets equal to the prophets of Jehovah (1
Kings, XX. 28). The God of the Hebrews, in many
passages of the bible, reproves the pagan nations for
this their error, and calls upon them to renounce it.
For example, in the forty fifth chapter of Isaiah, after a
very circumstantial prediction respecting Cyrus, in
which that monarch is called by name, and his various
achievements are particularly described, at least one
hundred and fifty years before his birth; the God of
the Hebrews is represented as declaring that he had
uttered this prediction for the express purpose of
showing to Cyrus, that Jehovah, the Self-Existent,

HEBREW AND PAGAN PROPHETS. 171

ihe Everlasting God, was the God of Israel (Isaiah
xlv. 1-7).

He then contrasts his creative powder, his open,
frank declarations, and his undeviating truth, with the
crooked cunning and falsehood of the pagan deities
(vs. 18, 19). Finally, he calls all nations to come
together, and, before them all, appeals to this prophe-
cy as an instance of foreknowledge altogether be-
yond the reach of the heathen prophets, and a tri-
umphant proof that he alone is the true God, and
his prophets the only true prophets (vs. 20-22). It
will be my object in this chapter to follow out the
train of thought here suggested, and by contrasting
the Hebrew with the heathen prophets, to show that
the former only have a just claim to divine inspiration.

III. PROPHETS OF ANCIENT GREECE.

The Grecians were the most celebrated for learn-
ing and refinement of all the ancient nations, and
the epistles of Paul contain frequent allusions to the
fame of their wisdom. The Greeks had their proph-
ets, and to them the Greek moralists, lawgivers, and
magistrates submitted the most important questions,
and their decisions were considered sacredly bind-
ing by this polished and philosophic people. The
prophets of ancient Greece, then, being the best
which the heathen world can furnish, will be selected
as the subjects of comparison with the prophets of
the bible.

To enable the reader to make the comparison for
himself, I will attempt to give a brief and faithful
description of the Greek prophets, as represented

172 HEBREW AND PAGAN PROPHETS.

by the Greek historians, and of the Hebrew prophets
as they are represented in the bible.

There can surely be no. objection to this mode of
investigating the subject; for it allows each nation
to give its own account of those for whom it claims
divine inspiration, and to whom it attributes a knowl-
edge of future events.

There was one class of sacred persons among the
ancient Greeks called theomantes^ who may, in some
respects, be compared with the Hebrew prophets.
They seem to have united in their occupation the
character of itinerant preacher and fortune-teller;
for they rambled through the country, giving people
advice in regard to their moral duties, chanting pas-
sages of the poets, and pretending to lay open the
secrets of futurity. But they never ventured on pre-
dictions, till after offerings had been made and cer-
tain prescribed ceremonies accurately performed —
the common expedient of all impostors to conceal the
artifices by which they dupe vulgar credulity.

Poorly qualified as these theomantes were for re-
ligious teachers, it was to them alone that the com-
mon people of this celebrated nation could look for
spiritual guidance. None of their instructions have
descended to our times. (Compare Eichhorn's Intro-
duction to the Old Testament, in German, preface to
vol. iv).

IV. GREEK ORACLES.

Those, however, who can more properly be com-
pared with the Hebrew prophets, were the attendants
on the various oracles. These separated themselves

HEBREW AND PAGAN PROPHETS. 173

from ail human society and withdrew to some soli-
tude, where a thick wood, a craggy mountain, a
waterfall, or a dark cave, might awaken the awe of
their superstitious countrymen, and impose upon
them the belief that there was the residence of some
pagan deity. There they lived in mysterious retire-
ment, and pretended to hold intercourse with the in-
visible w^orld. Thither must all repair who wished
to consult them; and no one could obtain an answer
to his inquiries, till he had presented gifts to the god
of the place, and passed through various ceremonies,
all calculated to put him in such a state of shuddering
apprehension as would prevent his detecting an im-
position, or suspecting the artifice of which he was
made the dupe. The responses were then given,
artfully expressed in hexameter verse by poets hired
for that purpose ; but their language is so chosen, that
it is always more or less equivocal and often unintel-
ligible. Many of these oracles or prophecies have
been preserved by the Greek historians, though no
two writers, when they profess to record the same
oracle, ever give it in precisely the same words. »

We have enough of these remains to enable us to
form an estimate of the subjects, which were usually
laid before the Greek prophets, and of the manner in
which they disposed of them. Religion or morality
is very seldom mentioned. They were principally
occupied about public enterprise, emigrations, wars,
and controversies between states and individuals.
When disputes were to be settled by them, they
were often bribed by one party to give sentence
against the other; if they desired to keep in favor
15*

174 HEBREW AND PAGAN PROPHETS*

with both, they would procrastinate and evade the
question. When the issue of public enterprises waa
demanded, they sometimes learned from men of ex-
perience in public affairs what reply it would be most
safe to give; or their answers were so artfully couch-
ed, that they could bear opposite meanings. If
these expedients failed, they referred the inquirer to
the superstitious arts of magic and astrology; or
they evaded the point by railery, and instead of in-
structing by prophecy, amused or irritated by sar-
casm; and when every resource of cunning was ex-
hausted, they would say that their god was an-
gry and refused to answer. What is remarkable
in all their prophecies, they seldom, if ever, have any
good moral tendency. Virtue is not rewarded, nor
vice punished. Power is flattered, however unjust;
and weakness is left unprotected, however innocent.
The grossest idolatry is always inculcated; and,
m many instances, the horrid superstition of sacri-
ficing human beings to the infernal gods is expressly
enjoined.

An extravagant pecuniary reward was generally
the only condition on which these pretended prophe-
cies could be obtained.

Every part of this description of the Greek proph-
ets can be verified by quotations from the Greek
historians. (Compare Potter's Antiquities of Greece,
Book ii. chap. 7-1 2).

V. ORACLES OF APOLLO AND TROPHONIUS.

It is obvious from history, that some of the most
celebrated of the Greek oracles owed their celebrity

HEBREW AND PAGAN PROPHETS. 175

to exhilarating or stupifying gasses issuing from sub-
terranean caverns. Of all the oracles of ancient
Greece, none was more confided in than that of
Apollo at Delphi. The manner of its discovery is
thus related by Diodorus Siculus (Book xvi). 'Upon
mount Parnassus, w^here goats were wont to feed,
there was a deep cavern with a small narrow mouth,
to which when any of the goats approached, they
began immediately to leap after a most unusual and
antic manner, uttering strange and unheard of sounds.
The goatherd observing this, and wondering what
should be the cause of it, went himself to view the
cavern, whereupon he also was seized with a like fit
of madness, leaping, and dancing, and foretelling
things to come.'

The effect of this gas on the officiating priestess,
is thus described by archbishop Potter in the work
already quoted: 'She was no sooner inspired, but
she began immediately to swell and foam at the
mouth, tearing her hair, cutting her flesh, and in all
her other behavior appearing like one frantic and
distracted.' 'In some instances the paroxysm was
so violent as to occasion immediate death.

Pausanias informs us that 'he who desired to con-
sult the oracle of Trophonius's cave at Lebadea in
Bceotia, was obliged to undergo various preparatory
ceremonies, which continued through several days:
he was to purify himself by various methods, and to
offer sacrifices to many different deities; he was then
conducted by night to a neighboring river, where he
was anointed and washed; he afterwards drank of
the waters of forgetfulness, that his former care&

176 HEBREW AND PAGAN PROPHETS.

might be buried; and of the water of remembrance,
that he might forget nothing of what he was to see.
The cave was surrounded by a wall; it resembled
an oven; was four cubits wide and eight deep; it was
descended by a ladder; and he who went down car-
ried with him cakes made of honey; when he was
got down he was made acquainted with futurity.'
(See Beloe's Herodotus, vol. i. p. 36).

He was always pale and dejected on his return,
and thence it became proverbial to say of a melan-
choly man, that he had consulted the oracle of
Trophonius.

It was in contrast with oracles such as these that
Jehovah declares, / have not spoken in secret^ in a
dark place of the earth: and in contrast with the dif-
ficulty of obtaining the oracular responses, and their
ambiguous and unintelligible language when obtained,
(which we shall now proceed to notice), that he
makes the additional declarations: I said not to the
seed of Jacobs seek ye me in vain, I the Lord speak
righteousness^ I declare tilings that are right: that is,
as bishop Lowth translates it, 'I speak truth and
give direct answers' (Isa. xlv. 19).

The time of consulting the Delphic oracle was
originally only during one month of the year, and
generally on the seventh day of the month, that
being considered Apollo's birthday; and when re-
sponses were given most frequently, they could never
be obtained oftener than once a month.

•Whoever went to consult the oracle,' says Pot-
ter, 'was required to make large presents to the
god, whereby it came to pass that this temple, in

HEBREW AND PAGAN PROPHETS, 177

riches, splendor, and magnificence, was superior to
almost all others in the world.' 'It was the custom
also to offer sacrifices to Apollo, in which, except the
omens were favorable, the prophetess would not
give any answer. At the sacrifices there were five
priests that assisted the prophets, and another priest
also that assisted the prophetess in managing the
oracle.' (Potter's Antiquities of Greece, Book ii.
chap. ix).

As those priests were the sole judges of the omens,
it was very easy for them to evade every question
respecting which it might be inexpedient for them to
commit themselves.

Among the presents which Croesus sent to this
oracle, Herodotus (B. i. c. 50, 51) enumerates the
following, 'one hundred and seventeen tiles of gold,
four of which were of the purest gold, each weighing
one talent and a half; the rest of inferior quality,
but of the weight of two talents; also a lion of pure
gold, weighing ten talents; two large vessels or gob-
lets, one of gold and the other of silver, the former
weighing nearly nine talents, and the latter contain-
ing six hundred amphorae; a female statue of gold,
three cubits high,' and many other things of equal
value.

To the oracle of Amphiarus in Thebes, he also sent
•a shield of solid gold, with a strong spear made en-
tirely of gold, both shaft and head. These were all
(continues Herodotus) within my memory, preserved
at Thebes, in the temple of the Ismenian Apollo.'

They who consulted this oracle of Amphiarus,
were to abstain from wine for three days, and froni

178 HEBREW AND PAGAN PROPHETS.

all nourishment for twenty four hours. They then
sacrificed a ram, on the skin of which they lay down
to sleep, and received responses in their dreams.

VI. CHARACTER OF THE ORACULAR RESPONSES.

The general character of the oracular responses is
described by the pagan Cicero, with entire fidelity,
in the following paragraph from his work de Divina-
tione (ii. 56).

'But now I come to thee, sacred Apollo, who dwell-
est at the centre of the earth, whence first proceed-
ed the wild and superstitious sound.* For Chrysip-
pus has filled a whole volume with thy oracles,
partly false, as I think; and sometimes true by mere
accident, as it frequently so happens in other cases;
and sometimes enigmatical and obscure, so that the
interpreter needs to be interpreted, and the response
referred back to the oracle ; and often purposely and
artificially ambiguous. For when this response came
to the richest king of Asia, "Croesus by crossing the
Halys shall destroy a great power," he supposed that
he was to destroy the power of the enemy, but he
destroyed his own. Whatever might have been the
event, therefore, the oracle would have remained
true.'

Herodotus informs us (B. i. c. 91) that when
Croesus, after his defeat, made complaint to the
priestess of Apollo, that she had deceived him in the
oracle referred to in this passage of Cicero, she re-

* Sed jam ad te venio,
Sancte Apollo, qui umbilicum certum terrarum obsides,
Unde superstitiosa primum sseva evasit vox fera.

HEBREW AND PAGAN PROPHETS. 179

plied, 'that Croesus was not justified in his com-
plaints; for Apollo had declared, that if he made
war against the Persians, a mighty empire would be
overthrown; the real purport of which communica-
tion, if he had been anxious to understand, it became
him to have inquired whether the god alluded to his
empire, or to the empire of Cyrus; but that not un-
derstanding the reply which had been made, nor con-
descending to make a second inquiry, he had been
himself the cause of his own misfortune.' By this
evasion, the unfortunate king found that he had been
outwitted, and was obliged to submit in silence.

To illustrate still further the nature of the subjects
which were usually laid before the Greek prophets,
and the manner in which they disposed of them, the
following examples are selected from Herodotus.

On a certain occasion the Lacedemonians, says
Herodotus, ' dissatisfied with the languor and inac-
tivity of peace, and conceiving themselves, in all
respects, superior to the Tegeans, they sent to con-
sult the oracle concerning the entire conquest of
Arcadia. The Pythian thus answered them:

Ask ye Arcadia? 'tis a bold demand,
A rough and hardy race defend the land.
Repulsed by them, one only boon you gain,
With frequent foot to dance on Tegea's plain.
And o'er her fields the meas'ring cord to strain.*'

* The above is Beloe's translation. Literally rendered,
the latter part of the oracle reads thus: ' But I will not re-
fuse you. I will grant you to dance on Tegea, struck with
your feet, and to allot th^i fine soil with the cord.'

180 HEBREW AND PAGAN PROPHETS.

'No sooner had the Lacedemonians received this
reply than, leaving the other parts of Arcadia unmo-
lested, they proceeded to attack the Tegeans, carry-
ing a quantity of fetters with them. They relied on
the evasive declaration of the oracle, and imagined
that they should infallibly reduce the Tegeans to ser-
vitude. They engaged them and were defeated: as
many as were taken captive were loaded with the
fetters which themselves had brought, and were thus
employed in laborious service in the fields of the
Tegeans.' (B. i. c. 66).

The Lacedemonians, after having been repeatedly
defeated by the Tegeans, again sent to consult the
Delphic oracle. 'The Pythian (says Herodotus)
assured them of success, if they brought back the
body of Orestes, son of Agamemnon. Unable to
discover his tomb, they sent a second time to inquire
concerning the place of his interment. The follow-
ing was the oracular communication:

A plain within the Arcadian land I know,
Where double winds with forced exertion blow,
Where form to form with mutual strength replies,
And ill by other ills supported lies:
That earth contains the great Atrides' son;
Take him and conquer : Tegea then is won.'

I give the oracle in the translation of Beloe, but
the last line, on which the import of the whole de-
pends, literally rendered, reads thus:

Having taken him, (that is, the body of Orestes),
thou shah be a helper of Tegea,

HEBREW AND PAGAN PROPHETS. 181

The Lacedemonians were as much in the dark as
ever in respect to the place where they might find the
body of Orestes, but they continued their search for
it without intermission. At length one of their dis-
tinguished countrymen named Lichas, being in Arca-
dia on public business, and happening to visit a
smith at his forge, observed with particular curiosity
the process of working the iron. The man took no-
tice of his attention, and desisted from his labor.
^Stranger of Sparta, said he, you seem to admire the
art which you contemplate; but how much more
would you be excited, if you knew all that I am able
to communicate t Near this place, as I was sinking a
well, I found a coffin seven cubits long. I never be-
lieved that men were formerly of larger dimensions
than at present; but when I opened it, I discovered
a body equal in length to the coffin. I correctly
measured it, and replaced it where I found it.'

'Lichas, after hearing his relation, was induced to
believe that this was the body of Orestes, concerning
which the oracle had spoken. He w^as further per-
suaded,, when he recollected that the bellows of the
smith might intimate the two winds; the anvil and
the hammer might express one form opposinganother;
sthe iron also which was beaten, might signify ill suc-
ceeding ill, rightly conceiving that the use of iron
operated to the injury of mankind.'

The Spartans by stratagem got possession of the
bones, and Tegea was conquered. (Herodotus, B. i.
c. 68).

Both the above oracles, particularly in the original
Greek, are entirely ambiguous, and would have been
16

1^2 HEBREW AND PAGAN PROPHETS.

equally true in each case, whether the Spartans or
Tegeans had conquered. They also sanction glaring
injustice, for it is not even intimated to the Spartans,
that their projected unprovoked attack on the peace-
ful Tegeans, for the sake of robbing them of their
lands and making them slaves, was contrary to every
principle of right. Nor does the historian himself
seem to think it wrong for the Spartans to make war
because they were tired of peace, nor a defect in the
oracle that it has nothing to say on the subject of
moral obligation. Politics, and not religion, war and
revenge, not peace and goodwill, were the topics
most acceptable to the prophets of ancient Greece.

Herodotus also (B. vii. c. 140-142) details the
oracles given to the Athenians, respecting the issue
of the Persian invasion; and also several others in
different parts of his history. They are all of the
same general character with those already described.

It is well known, that the Greek oracles were fre-
quently bribed by public men to give such answers
as would promote their own schemes. Plutarch in-
forms us, in his life of Themistocles, that this general,
' perceiving that he could not, by the force of human
reason, prevail with the multitude, set his machinery
to work as a poet would do in a tragedy, and had
recourse to prodigies and oracles;' and Demosthenes
publicly complained, that the Delphic oracle, being
bribed by Philip, philipized. 'He put the Thebans
in mind of Epaminondas, and the Athenians of Peri-
cles, how they reckoned such things (as oracles and
prodigies) the mere pretexts of cowardice, and pur-

HEBREW AND PAGAN PROPHETS. 183

sued the plan which their reason had dictated.' (Plu-
tarch's Life of Demosthenes).

Such was the estimation in which the Greek oracles
were held by the most intelligent of the Greeks them-
selves. And do you not in this description of the
Greek prophets, as given by the Greek historians,
plainly discover all the features of selfishness, impos-
ture, and crime?

How easy for these pretended prophets to deceive,
if they chose; and how much their whole system of
operations appears like an attempt to conceal a profit-
able fraud!

Surely, ' they have no knowledge that set up the
wood of their graven image and pray unto a god
that cannot save. He feedeth on ashes; a deceived
heart hath turned him aside, that he cannot deliver
his soul, nor say, is there not a lie in my right hand?'
(Isaiah xlv. 20; xliv. 20).

IV. MANNERS AND CHARACTER OF THE HEBREW PROPHETS.

From this scene of pagan imposture and credulity,
let us now turn to the prophets of the bible. In
every respect we find them the reverse of those just
described. They sought no concealment, and affect-
ed no mystery; but mingled with society, and lived
generally like other men. They were at all times
and in all places accessible to such as craved their
advice, and this they freely imparted without exact-
ing gifts to gratify their own avarice, or requiring
ceremonies to work on the fears of those who con-
sulted them. No arts were resorted to, to deceive
others into a mysterious dread of their sacredness.

184 HEBREW AND PAGAN PROPHETS.

It is true, that they sometimes used striking symbolie
representations, but it was to awaken the attention
of a sensual and thoughtless people to listen to their
instructions (Isaiah xx. 2-4).

They were sometimes seen in the habiliments of
mourning; but it was to manifest the depth of the
grief they felt for the sin and the obstinacy of their
nation.

In their prophecies there was neither artifice, eva-
sion, nor ambiguity; but they were prompt, direct,
and decisive. On all occasions of great public inte-
rest, they were seen in the most frequented places,
enforcing their instructions with the most sincere
and impassioned eloquence upon the listening throngs
who surrounded them. These public addresses they
frequently committed to writing, and we have them
in every form, from the simplest prose to the most
lofty elevation of poetry. The writings of the He-
brew prophets which have descended to us, are so
full and complete, that we have every facility for as-
certaining the usual subjects and general character
of their prophecies.

VII. SUBJECTS AND CHARACTER OF THEIR PROPHECIES.

Religion was the great subject on which they lov-
ed to dwell, and with them religion was neither an
empty sound nor a superstitious ceremonial. The
love and worship of one spiritual and holy God,,
obedience to his law, purity of heart, as the most
acceptable sacrifice, (an idea beyond even the imagi-
nation of a heathen prophet); these constituted the
religion of the Hebrew prophets. It was in contem-

HEBREW AND PAGAN PROPHETS. 185

plation of subjects such as these, that their spirits
moved with rapture, rose on the wings of a holy en-
thusiasm to the very throne of the Majesty on high,
which no mortal eye but theirs had ever seen, and no
mortal tongue but theirs had ever dared to celebrate.
In all their prophecies, it was their constant aim
to exert the most salutary moral influence. Calam-
ity they always threatened as the punishment of sin,
and prosperity was the sure reward of holy obe-
dience. To the corruptions of their times, they pre-
sented independent, bold, and unyielding opposition;
ungodly rulers, they fearlessly withstood, by severe
and public rebuke; and when kings and people unit-
ed to abolish or disregard the laws of God, these
holy men came forth (though hatred, persecution,
imprisonment, and death were often the reward of
their fidelity) with direct, unequivocal, and solemn
declarations of their own abhorrence of such evil
designs and of the divine vengeance against them.
Superstitious arts calculated to impose on the credu-
lity of an ignorant multitude, such as astrology,
magic, and necromancy, they pointedly condemned;
and the rich presents which were offered them, they
rejected. Their predictions of future events were
public, clear, impossible to be misapprehended, and
such as no human foresight could have conjectured.

VIII. ILLUSTRATIONS FROM THE OLD TESTAMENT.

You scarcely need to be referred to instances of
what has now been advanced, for they occur so fre-
quently on the pages of the Old Testament, that one
who has any acquaintance with the bible, will be at
16*

tSS PIEBREW AND PAGAN PROPHETS*

no loss to verify this description of the biblical
prophets.

You cannot have forgotten how^ Elisha repelled
the princely offers of Naaman; hov^ Isaiah publicly
and severely rebuked the idolatrous Ahaz; how
steadfastly Jeremiah resisted the rebellious designs of
his king and nation, though their reproaches and per-
secutions wounded him so deeply that he often wish-
ed for death to put an end to his anguish. In the
whole character of the Hebrew prophets we see a
frankness which disdained concealment, and a virtue
which abhorred deception.

In further illustration of what has been advanced
examine 2 Sam. xii; 1 Kings xviii. 10, 17, 18; xxi^
17-24.

The prophet Nathan did not hesitate to pourtray
m the liveliest colors the sin which had been com-
mitted by his sovereign and patron, and boldly to
say to the guilty monarch. Thou art the man.

The prophet Elijah knew that the tyrant Ahab had
long been searching all the neighboring states to ap-
prehend and put him to death; but he fearlessly stood
before him, and when the haughty monarch accosted
him with the question, 'Art thou he that troubleth
Israel?' he instantly replied, 'I have not troubled
Israel; but thou and thy father's house, in that ye
have forsaken the commandments of the Lord; and
thou hast followed Baalim.'

When the same king had been guilty of another
act of the most flagrant injustice respecting Naboth,.
the same prophet went to him with the appalling
message: 'Thus saith the Lord, In the place where-

HEBREW AND PAGAN PROPHETS. 187

dogs licked the blood of Naboth, shall dogs lick thy
blood, even thine. And Ahab said to Elijah, Hast
thou found me, O mine enemy? And he answered,
I have found thee, because thou hast sold thyself to
work evil in the sight of the Lord.' Where in the
whole compass of heathen inspiration shall we find
a resistance to regal tyranny, a defence of injured
and helpless innocence, to be compared with this?

IX. THE CONTRAST.

And now is not the difference between the He-
brew and the heathen prophets perfectly obvious?
In the one case we see all the machinery of fraud, a
total destitution of moral feeling, and every indica-
tion of an exclusive attachment to this world. In
the other case we can discover no wish and no op-
portunity to deceive; we find a most acute moral
sensibility and an inflexible adherence to w^hat is
right, and a total renunciation of all worldly hopes,
whenever they interfered with the calls of duty. The
former, just what we should expect from men of this
world, who had no faith in another; the latter, just
what we should expect from men of God, who had
placed all their hopes in heaven. Who, that has any
knowledge of the subject, can pretend to place them,
on equal ground, or say that they have equal claims
to divine inspiration? In the contrast, the interpreter
of Greek oracles stands abashed before the Hebrew
prophet, like the witch of Endor before the rising
spirit of Samuel.

How shall we account for it, that the Hebrews,.
who were so far below the Greeks in learning, re-

188 HEBREW AND PAGAN PROPHETSr

finement, and power, should rise so far above them in
the character of their religious teachers? To the
Hebrews were sent holy men of God^ who spake as
they icere moved by the Holy Ghost; while the Greeks,
seeking after wisdom^ became vain in their imagination^
and their foolish heart was darkened.

Deficiency in religious feeling, and not the want of
appropriate and sufficient evidence, is, after all, the
great cause of scepticism in respect to the inspiration
of the bible. In the stillness of a vSabbath morning,
when, if ever, the soul loves to commune with hea-
ven, let the devout man open the sacred pages, and
read till his heart glows with something of the fervor
of the inspired writers, and while his affections are
flowing with full tide towards the God of the Hebrew
patriarchs and prophets, let him lay aside the bible,
and suddenly turn his attention to any, even the most
lofty flights of heathen inspiration, and the painful
revulsion of feeling which he experiences, shows him
at once that he has changed his element, that he has
fallen upon another world. The angels who were
sent to warn Lot of his danger, could scarcely have
felt a greater contrast when they left the courts of
heaven, to tread the polluted streets of Sodom. The
devout man, who reads the prophetic parts of the
Old Testament, with one spark of the feeling with
which they were composed, no more needs a philo-
sophical proof of their divine origin, than Elijah
needed a metaphysical demonstration of the existence
of God, while ascending to heaven in his fiery chariot;
and I suppose no one will consider it a breach of
charity to say, that it is not by devout men, that the

HEBREW AND PAGAN PROPHETS, 189

divine authority of the Old Testament is called in
question.

X. FULFILMENT OF PROPHECY.

In further illustration of this subject, we will now
notice a few of the more remarkable prophecies of the
bible, which, with their fulfilment, the reader is re-
quested to compare with the Greek prophecies intro-
duced in section vi. of this chapter.

1 . Predictions respecting Cyrus, Isaiah xliv. xlv.

About one hundred and fifty years before the birth
of Cyrus, the Hebrew prophet Isaiah described this
monarch by name,* and intimated (Isaiah x-lv. 4) that
this was his surname^ and not the name given him at
his birth; accurately foretold the victories he was to
achieve, and the benefits which he was to confer upon
the Jewish people, by delivering them from the Baby-
lonian captivity. This prophecy was published nearly^
a century before Nebuchadnezzar subdued Judea..
Babylon was then but just rising into notice; the
very existence of the empire was scarcely known to
the Hebrews; Persia, the native country of Cyrus,
was yet in the darkness of barbarism; while Judea
was an old, established and powerful kingdom. The
accomplishment of this prediction, therefore, would

* Herodotus informs us (B. i. c. 114) that Cyrus was not the
original name of this monarch, but one which he assumed at
a later period, probably on his accession to the throne, or after
the achievement of some of his great victories. In the He-
brew the name is written iy-)l3 [Koraesh], and in the Pehlvi
or ancient Persian, Korshid, which means sun-glory, or
splendor like that of the sun. (See Jahn's Heb.Com. p. 148).

190 HEBREW AND PAGAN PROPHETS.

appear to the politicians of that age as improbable,
as it would now appear to our politicians, if they
were told that these United States in the course of a
century would fall under the dominion of one of the
new and still tottering republics of South America,
and would finally be delivered from their bondage by
a powerful monarch of the Northwest Coast. To
this prophecy Jehovah appeals, (as has been already
observed) as an instance of foreknowledge altogether
beyond the reach of the heathen prophets, and a tri-
umphant proof, that he alone is the true God, and
his prophets the only true prophets.

'Assemble yourselves (says he) and come, draw
near together ye that are escaped of the nations:
they have no knowledge that set up the wood of their
graven image, and pray unto a god that cannot save.
Tell ye, and bring them near; yea, let them take
counsel together, who hath declared this from ancient
time? Have not I the Lord? and there is no God
else besides me; a just God and a Saviour, there is
none besides me. Look unto me, and be ye saved,
all the ends of the earth; for I am God, and there is
none else' (Isaiah xlv. 20, 21).

2. Predictions respecting Babylon.

In close connection with the preceding are the
predictions of Isaiah and Jeremiah respecting the
overthrow of Babylon, the fulfilment of which we
will now consider. Of these predictions that of
Isaiah was uttered one hundred and sixty years, and
that of Jeremiah fifty six years before the event.
(Compare Jer. l.-li). The historical proof on this
subject is entirely conclusive, and will be exhibited

HEBREW AND PAGAN PROPHETS, I9l

in its proper place, when we come to the discussion
of the authenticity of the prophetic writings of Isaiah
and Jeremiah. It cannot be said, therefore, with any
show of reason, that these prophecies were written
after the events.

The circumstantial particularity of these predic-
tions, their antecedent improbability, their progres-
sive accomplishment through a long series of ages,
and the great variety of the events predicted, ren-
der it equally impossible to account for these pro-
phecies on the ground that they were sagacious and
happy conjectures.

To enable the reader to make the comparison for
himself, I will exhibit the predictions in the words of
the prophets, and in parallel columns the account of
the events in the words of the classic historians, re-
lying principally on Herodotus and Xenophon. The
first of these historians lived two hundred and fifty
years after Isaiah and one hundred and fifty after Jere-
miah, and the latter three hundred and fifty after
Isaiah and two hundred and fifty after Jeremiah.

Babylon was considered impregnable. Its high
and strong walls surmounted by lofty towers, its
broad and deep ditches, its large magazines, and the
numerous squares within the city, which were plant-
ed with corn and yielded an annual supply of pro-
visions, seemed sufiicient to secure the inhabitants
forever from all attacks of their enemies. (Jahn's
Heb. Com. p. 152).

Some of the more remarkable circumstances of its
capture and subsequent fate, exhibiting the coin-
cidence between prophecy and history are the fol-
lowing:

192

HEBREW AND PAGAN PROPHETS.

1. The besieging army to consist of various
nations.

PROPHECY.

Go up, O Elam, besiege,
O Media (Isaiah xxi. 2).

The noise of a multitude
in the mountains, like as
of a great people; a tu-
multuous noise of the
kingdoms of nations gath-
ered together: the Lord
of hosts numbereth the
host of the battle. They
come from a far country,
from the end of heaven
(Isaiah xiii. 4, 5).

Set ye up a standard in
the land, blow the trum-
pet among the nations,
prepare the nations a-
gainst her, call together
against her the kingdom
of Ararat, Minni, and
Ashchenaz; appoint a cap-
tain against her; cause
the horses to come up as
the rough caterpillars.

Prepare against her the

HISTORY.

While Cyrus was on his
march to Babylon, we
find him issuing the fol-
lowing orders to his
troops: 'Let Artabazus
lead the Persian (Elam)
shieldmen and archers;
after these, let Andramias
the Mede, lead the Medi-
an foot; after these, Em-
bas the Armenian (Ara-
rat) foot; after these, Ar-
tuchas, the Hyrcanians;
after these, Thambradas,
the Sacian foot ; after
these, Damades, the Ca-
dusians.' 'And do you ail
attend ready on the road
to Babylon, each of you
with all things proper.'
(Xenophon, Cyrop. B. v.
c. iii. 38.)

While the army lay at
Babylon, there are men-
tioned among his soldiers,

nations, with the kings of in addition to the above,

the Medes, the captains the Phrygians, Lydians,

thereof and all the rulers Arabians, and Cappado-

thereof (Jer. li. 27-28). cians (lb. B. vii. c. v. 15).

HEBREW AND PAGAN PROPHETS.

193

The Hebrew name Elam corresponds to the Greek
Persia, and Ararat and Minni to Armenia and the
neighboring northern countries; the locality of Ash-
kenaz is less certain.

2. The river to be dried wp^ the gates to he left open^
and the city taken by surprise during a night of revelry
and drunkenness.

The reader should recollect, that the river Eu-
phrates passed through the midst of Babylon; and
that besides the external wall, there was a wall on
each side of the river, and the only entrance to the
city from the river was by brazen gates, which were
carefully closed every night. The river here was a
quarter of a mile in width and more than twelve feet
deep. (Herodotus, B. i. c. 180, 181).

PROPHECY. HISTORY.

God saith to the deep, Cyrus placed one de-
Be dry, and I will dry up tachment of his forces

thy rivers (Isa. xliv. 27).
A draught is upon her
waters and they shall be
dried up (Jer. 1. 38).

I will dry up her sea and
make her springs dry
(Jer. li. 36.)

I will loose the loins of
kings to open before him
the two-leaved gates, and
the gates shall not be shut
(Isaiah xlv. 1).

In their heat I will
make their feasts, and I
17

where the river first en-
ters the city, and another
where it leaves it, direct-
ing them to enter the
channel, and attack the
town, wherever a passage
could be effected. He
pierced the bank and in-
troduced the river into
the lake, by which means
the bed of the Euphrates
became sufficiently shal-
low for the object in
view. The Persians in

194

HEBREW AND PAGAN PROPHETS.

will make them drunken.
And I will make drunk
her princes and her wise
men, her captains and her
rulers and her mighty
men (Jer. li. 39, 57).

The night of my plea-
sure hath he turned into
fear unto me. Prepare
the table, watch in the
watch-tower, eat, drink:
arise ye princes, anoint
the shield (Isa. xxi. 4, 5).

Therefore shall evil
come upon thee, thou
shalt not know from
whence it riseth; and mis-
chief shall fall upon thee,
thou shalt not be able to
put it off; and desolation
shall come upon thee sud-
denly, which thou shalt
not know (Isa. xlvii. 11).

But these two things
shall come to thee in a
moment, in one day, the
loss of children and wid-
owhood: they shall come
upon thee in their perfec-
tion, for the multitude of
thy sorceries and for the
abundance of thine en-
chantments (Isa. xlvii. 9).

their station watched the
proper opportunity, and
when the stream had so
far retired as not to be
higher than their thighs,
they entered Babylon
without difficulty. If the
besieged had either been
aware of the designs of
Cyrus, or had discovered
the project before its ac-
tual accomplishment,they
might have effected the
total destruction of these
troops. They had only
to secure the little gates
which led to the river,
and to have manned the
embankments on either
side, and they might have
enclosed the Persians in
a net from which they
could never have escaped.
As it happened they were
taken by surprise. It was
a day of festivity among
them, and whilst the citi-
zens were engaged in
dance and merriment,
Babylon was, for the first
time, thus taken! (Herod-
otus, i. 191),

HEBREW AND PAGAN PROPHETS. 195

By comparing the prophecy with the history, it
will appear that every circumstance known to the
historian after the event, had been known to the
prophets long before.

I will here subjoin the account of the taking of
Babylon as given by Xenophon, which includes some
particulars not mentioned by Herodotus.

Cyrus 'measuring out the ground around the wall,
and from the side of the river, — he dug round the
wall on every side a very great ditch. When he
heard they were celebrating a festival in Babylon, in
which all the Babylonians drank and revelled the
whole night; on that occasion, as soon as it grew
dark, he took a number of men with him, and opened
the ditches into the river. When this was done, the
water ran off in the night by the ditches, and the pas-
sage of the river through the city became passable.'
'Then making those that attended his person, both
foot and horse, to go down into the dry part of the
river, he ordered them to try whether the channel of
the river was passable.' They reported that it was.
Cyrus then addressed his troops, and concluded by
saying, ' Do you Gobryas and Gadatas* show us the
ways, for you are acquainted with them, and when
we are got in, lead us the readiest way to the palace.
It may be no wonder, perhaps, said they that were
with Gobryas, if the gates of the palace are open,
for the city seems to night to be in a general revel,
but we shall meet with a guard at the gates, for there

* These were two Assyrian noblemen who had gone over
to Cyrus on account of the cruelties practised upon them by
the Babylonian king.

196 HEBREW AND PAGAN PROPHETS.

is always one set there.' ' When this was said, they
marched; and of those that they met with, some they
fell on and killed, some fled, and some set up a clam-
or. They that were with Gobryas, set up a clamor
w^ith them, as if they were revellers themselves, and
marching on the shortest way that they could, they
got round about the palace.' 'As soon as the noise
and clamor began, they that were within, perceiving
the disturbance, and the king commanding them to
examine what the matter was, ran out, throwing open
the gates. They that were with Gadatas, as soon as
they saw the gates loose, broke in, pressing forward
on the runaways, and dealing their blows among
them, they came up to the king, and found him now
in a standing posture with his sw^ord drawn. They
that were with Gadatas and Gobryas being many in
number, mastered him; they likewise that were with
him were killed.' ' Gadatas and Gobryas then came
up, and having first paid their adoration to the gods,
for the revenge they had had on their impious king,
they then kissed the hands and feet of Cyrus, shed-
ding many tears in the midst of their joy and satis-
faction.' (Cyropaed. B. vii. c. 5.)

The death of the king, as described by Xenophon,
had been predicted by the prophet in these words:

'But thou art cast out of thy grave as an abomina-
ble branch, and as the raiment of those that are slain,
thrust through with the sword, that go down to the
stones of the pit; as a carcass trodden under feet'
(Isaiah xiv. 19).

The joy occasioned by his death was predicted
with equal clearness.

HEBREW AND PAGAN PROPHETS.

197

'The whole earth is at rest, and is quiet; they break
forth into singing. Yea, the fir-trees rejoice at thee,
and the cedars of Lebanon, saying, Since thou art
laid down, no feller is come up against us' (Isaiah
xiv. 7, 8).

3. The place to be forever uninhabited^ a dwelling of
ivild beasts, and a place of stagnant waters*

PROPHECY. HISTORY.

And Babylon, the glory 'The Persians destroyed
of kingdoms, the beauty a part of the city, time

of the Chaldees' excellen-
cy, shall be as when God
overthrew Sodom and
Gomorrah.

It shall never be inhab-
ited, neither shall it be
dwelt in from generation
to generation ; neither
shall the Arabian pitch
tent there; neither shall
the shepherds make their
fold there.

17^

and the negligence of the
Macedonians destroyed a
part.' ' It is now almost
entirely deserted, so that
we may safely say of it
what a certain poet said
of Megalopolis, the great
city of Arcadia: the great
city is now a vast soli-
tude.' (Strabo, B. xvi).
Babylon, once the great-
est of all cities which the
sun ever looked upon, has
now nothing left but the
walls. (Pausanias, B. viii.
c. 33).

I have learned from a
certain Elamite brother,
who came from those
parts and now lives as a
monk in Jerusalem, that
the royal hunting grounds

198

HEBREW AND PAGAN PROPHETS.

But wild beasts of the
desert shall lie there ; and
their houses shall be full
of doleful creatures; and
owls shall dwell there,
and satyrs shall dance
there.

And the wild beasts of
the island shall lay in their
desolate houses, and dra-
gons in their pleasant
palaces (Isa. xiii. 20-22).

And Babylon shall be-
come heaps, a dwelling
place for dragons, an as-
tonishment and a hissing,
without an inhabitant.
They shall roar together
like lions ; they shall yell
as lions' whelps (Jer. li.
37, 38).

are in Babylon; and that
wild beasts of all kinds
are kept within its walls.'
(Jerome Com. in Is. c. 1 3).
'I soon distinguished
that the causes of our
alarm were two or three
majestic lions, taking the
air upon the heights of the
pyramid.' 'We then rode
close up to the ruins; and
I had once more the grat-
ification of ascending the
awful sides of the tower
of Babel. In my progress
I stopped several times to
look at the broad prints
of the feet of the lions, left
plain in the clayey soil;
and by the track, I saw
that if we had chosen to
rouse such royal game,
we need not go far to find
their lair. But, while thus
actually contemplating
these savage tenants, wan-
dering amidst the towers
of Babylon, and bedding
themselves within the
deep cavities of her once
magnificent temple, I
could not help reflecting

HEBREW AND PAGAN PROPHETS.

199

1 will also make it a
possession for the bittern,
and pools of water; and
I will sweep it with the
besom of destruction,
saith the Lord of hosts
(Isaiah xiv. 23).

on how faithfully the va-
rious prophecies had been
fulfilled.' (Sir R. K. Por-
ter).

' The tower is still to be
seen and is half a league
in diameter, but is so ruin-
ous, so low, and so full
of venomous creatures,
which lodge in holes made
by them in the rubbish,
that no one durst ap-
proach nearer to it than
within half a league, ex-
cept during two months
in the winter, when these
animals never stir out of
their holes.' (Rauwolf).

' Not only great part of
this plain is little better
than a swamp, but large
deposits of the waters are
left stagnant in the hol-
lows between the ruins;
again verifying the threat
denounced against it.' (Sir
R. K. Porter).

I have been thus minute in pointing out the fulfil-
ment of this prophecy, because it can be taken as a
fair representative of the whole class of the biblical
prophecies, as contrasted with the heathen oracles
of which some examples have been given. For fur-

200 HEBREW AND PAGAN PROPHETS.

ther particulars the reader may consult Lowth's
Isaiah, Newton on the Prophecies (Diss, x.), and Rol-
lin's Ancient History (B. iv. chap. i. art. 2). It was
for her unexampled licentiousness, her pride and her
cruelty, that Babylon was thus laid desolate, as the
prophets repeatedly declared. (See Robinson's Cal-
met. Art. Babylon).

The most recent and accurate observer of the stu-
pendous ruins of this ancient city is Sir Robert Ker
Porter, who visited them in 1820. He found them in
all respects confirming the accuracy of the prophetic
writings. (Travels, vol. ii. p. 305-405).

Some of the earliest and most minute of the proph-
ecies are in a course of literal accomplishment even
at the present day. For example, the remarkable
predictions of Moses respecting the Jewish nation.
(Deut. xxviii).

The predictions respecting the sufferings and
death of Christ (Isaiah lii. 13-liii. 12); and those of
Christ respecting the destruction of Jerusalem (Mat-
thew xxiv.), are discussed by Dr. Paley with his usual
skill and irresistible power of demonstration in his
Evidences, (Part ii. chap. 1).

It would carry me far beyond the limits of the pre-
sent work to go into an extended statement of the
fulfilment of scripture prophecies. Nor is it neces-
sary, for my only object in this chapter has been, as
stated in the outset, by contrasting the Hebrew with
the heathen prophets, to show that the former, and
they only, have just claim to divine inspiration. The
specimens already given are, I suppose, abundantly
sufficient to accomplish this purpose.

CHAPTER ELEVENTH

DOCTRINE OF INSPIRATION.

I. IDEAS OF DIVINE INFLUENCE IN THE EARLIEST AGES.

Though the human race is depraved, the Divine
image is not entirely effaced; and under all circum-
stances man has felt his relationship to God and the
spiritual world. In the infancy of society, every
change in nature is attributed to the immediate in-
terposition of some superior invisible power. The
rolling thunder, the flashes of- lightning, the hail, the
storm, are all tokens of a present and majestic Deity.

Equally strong is this intuitive reference to spirit-
ual power in the gentler phenomena of nature. No
zephyr breathes, no tree moves its branches, no wa-
terfall murmurs, without awakening in unsophisticat-
ed man, the idea of a breathing, moving, conscious
spirit. Every object has life and intelligence; every
attractive and every gloomy spot is the residence of
some benevolent, or some terrific God; and man feels
himself walking in the midst of numberless invisible
beings with powers far above his own, who take a
deep interest in all that concerns him, and are con-
stantly watching his footsteps for evil or for good.

202 DOCTRINE OF INSPIRATION.

So with the phenomena of intellect. Every useful
invention; every superior exertion of skill or ingen-
uity; every good law; every brilliant thought; every
glowing and eloquent expression; is attributed to the
invisible power which employs the living, visible man,
as the instrument to accomplish its own mysterious
purposes. As the laws of matter and mind become
more developed and better understood, the number of
invisible agencies gradually decreases, till man arrives
at the idea of one great First Cause, governing the
universe which he himself has created, through the
medium of certain established laws — or the Creator
is even legislated out of his own world, and an ab-
stract principle is made to usurp the throne of the
Maker of heaven and earth! Who would not pre-
fer the living spirituality of the pastoral patriarch,
who could see an angel in every flower, and hear his
voice in every rill; who beheld God in every cloud,
and found for him a dwellingplace in every moun-
tain and grove — to the cold atheism of the philoso-
phic naturalist, who can see nothing on earth but
particles of matter in varied combinations, and no-
thing in the heavens but gases and lifeless solids?
This universal feeling after God, and longing for
communion with him, is itself a proof of the existence
of God. For every sentiment which results from our
constitution, has something in nature, corresponding
to it; and every want which the human soul feels,
has somewhere in the universe an object appropriate
to its gratification.

The numerous instances of pretended inspiration,
with which the history of the world abounds, and the

DOCTRINE OF INSPIRATION. 203

easy credulity with which they have been received, | ^'^,^
are a strong proof of the necessity and actual occur- I »Vv' "^
rence of real inspiration; as counterfeit money is of "^' "v
the existence and value of genuine coin. Without
light there can be no shadow, and there is no error c^ "^
without a corresponding truth. "* ^

All cultivated nations have possessed writings
which they supposed to be inspired. It is the object
of this chapter to develope the various theories of
inspiration which have at different periods been ex-
tensively prevalent in the world. "1

II. IDEAS OF INSPIRATION AMONG THE GREEKS AND ROMANS.

The ancient Greeks and Romans supposed that
nothing good or great could be effected without im-
mediate divine inspiration: that this inspiration was
of such a kind, that the inspired person was passive
under it, all voluntary action suspended, and his or-
gans used as the instruments of the deity within. —
Hence the praise or blame of what was done by the
influence of inspiration, belonged only to the inspir-
ing God, and not at all to the man, who was merely
a passive instrument, not a voluntary agent.

A few passages from their most distinguished wri-
ters will set their views on this subject clearly before
us. Homer, the most ancient of their so-called in-
spired men, has many declarations like the following:

Odyss. i. 200. Minerva, in the character of Men-
tes, says to Telemachus, 'I shall prophesy just what
the immortal gods put into my mind;' and in xv. 172,
Helen, in speaking to Menelaus make use of the same
words. Odyss. i. 347, Penelope requests the bard

204 DOCTRINE OF INSPIRATION.

Phemius not to make the Trojan war the subject of
his song, and is checked by Telemachus, who says:
'My mother, why do you blame the bard for singing
whatever comes into his mind; the bards are not re-
sponsible, but Jupiter is responsible, who dispenses to
each recipient mortal whatever he pleases.'

It must be recollected that the gods of the Greeks
and Romans were imperfect and passionate, and of-
ten unjust and cruel; and accordingly their inspira-
tion partook of the same character. Infallible inspi-
ration can come only from an infallible God.

Odyss. xxii. 346. Phemius himself says to Ulysses;
' God puts into my mind all sorts of songs.'

In the vSibylline oracles, one of the inspired speak-
ers says: 'I know nothing what I say, but declare
each thing God commands me to declare.'

To turn from the poets to the philosophers, Plato
puts the following sentiment into the mouth of Socra-
tes: 'The poet cannot compose nor the soothsayer
prophesy, unless he is inspired by God, and trans-
ported, as it were, beyond himself. He then loses
sight of the rules of art, and is borne away by the
divine impulse. God deprives him of his own con-
sciousness and reflection, and employs him as his
messenger. It is no longer he who speaks, but God
who speaks through him.' (Dial. Jon.)

In another dialogue Plato remarks, that ' w^e may
justly call poets and prophets divine^ because they
perform many and important things which they do
and declare, while they themselves have no under-
standing of them.'

DOCTRINE OF INSPIRATION. 205

Among the Romans, Cicero frequently expresses
sentiments of the same kind. He says that poets
*were inspired by a certain divine spirit:' that they
were called 'sacred, because they seemed to be com-
mended to us, as it were, by the office and gift of the
gods;' and that 'universally they were called and
esteemed sacred.' (Orat. pr. Arch. Poet).

In another place he says: 'No man ever became
great without a certain divine inspiration' {afflatus),
(De Nat. Deorum, ii. 66).

III. IDEAS OF THE ANCIENT HEBREWS.

The ideas of the nature and extent of inspiration
which prevailed among the ancient Hebrews, were
very similar to what we have just observed among
the Greeks and Romans, with this remarkable differ-
ence: that as the God of the Jews is a perfect, infal-
lible being, so his inspiration is always perfect and
infallible; and there is no room for that complaining
against the gods, so frequent in Greek and Roman
writers. Of course we speak only of the uninspired
Jews; for the biblical representations of this subject
are to be considered in the next chapter.

In the Apochryphal books, which were written
during the interval between the Old Testament and
the New, we find passages like the following:

The Wisdom of Solomon speaks of the sons of
God 'by whom the incorrupt light of the law was
given to the world' (xviii. 4).

Tobit declares, that he went up to Jerusalem lo
the feasts, 'as it was written for all Israel, in an ever-
lasting commandment' (i. 6).
18

206 DOCTRINE OF INSPIRATION,

Ecclesiasticus xxiv. Wisdom says of herself: 4
am the mother of fair love, and fear, and knov/ledge,
and holy hope' (verse 17).

'All these things are the book of the covenant of
the most high God, the law which Moses command-
ed, an inheritance to the congregations of Jacob.'
(verse 23).

'He fiUeth all things with his wisdom, as Phison
and as Tigris in the days of the new fruits, he maketh
understanding to abound like Euphrates, and like
Jordan in the days of harvest, he maketh instruction
appear as light, and like Gihon in the days of vintage
(verses 25-27).

Wisdom continues: 'I will yet make instruction
shine as the morning, and send forth her light afar
off; I will yet pour out doctrine as prophecy, and
leave it for future ages forever' (verses 32, 33).

In these declarations of uninspired Jews, we per-
ceive ideas of the fulness and power of inspiration
much like those which prevailed among the Greeks;
but the moral tone, how much more elevated! the
religious feeling, how clearly characteristic! In the
Greek inspiration we see nothing but intellect; proud,
unsanctified intellect; but in the Jewish, w^e at once
recognize the angel-form of religion. The one was
the mere child of earth, the other the daughter of
heaven.

In reference to the reluctant predictions of Balaam
respecting the future glory of Israel, Josephus says:

'Thus did Balaam speak by inspiration, as not be-
ing in his own power, but moved to say what he did
by the divine Spirit' (Ant. iv. 6: 5); and represents
Balaam as saying to the Moabitish king; '0 Balak, if

DOCTRINE OF INSPIRATION. 207

thou rightly .considerest this whole matter, canst thou
suppose that it is in our power to be silent, or to say
anything when the Spirit of God seizes upon us? For
he puts such w^ords as he pleases into our mouths,
and such discourses as we are not ourselves conscious
of. Those who take upon them to foretell the affairs
of mankind, as from their own abilities, are entirely
unable to do it, or to forbear to utter what God sug-
gests to them, or to offer violence to his w^ill; for
when he enters into us, nothing that we say is our
own.'

The same sentiments are everywhere found in
Philo.

'The prophet utters nothing that is his own, but
every thing from another. He is the organ of God
to utter sounds, being touched and struck by him
invisibly.' (De Leg. ii. 343).

'The prophets are the interpreters of God, he using
their organs to make known whatever he pleases.'
(De Mon. i. 222).

He also says, that, 'when the divine spirit enters,
the human understanding departs, and forsakes the
citadel of the soul.' (Eichhorn's Introduction, i. 127).

IV. IDEAS OF THE PRIMITIVE CHRISTIANS.

The ideas of inspiration, which prevailed in the
primitive christian church, were practical rather than
theoretical. Till sharp controversy brought the
teachers of Christianity to discussion and definition,
the notion that the scriptures were inspired, was a
matter of feeling, rather than of speculation. We
generally find, however, among the early fathers, the

208 DOCTRINE OF INSPIRATION.

same sort of opinions, which had previously prevail-
ed, though somew^hat modified and established on
more rational grounds. They said the sacred writers
were the scribes and the amanuenses of the Holy
Spirit, writing down the very words which God dic-
tated. Those were pronounced unbelievers, who
did not acknowledge that the scriptures were spoken
by the Holy Spirit.

Athenagoras remarks that Hhe Holy Spirit moved
the mouths of the sacred teachers, as musical instru-
ments are moved; that he breathes into them as the
flute-player breathes into the flute.' (Leg. 36).

Justin Martyr, describing the effect of inspiration,
says it is like the 'plectrum striking the lyre or the
harp.' (Cohort. 9).

Augustine, in speaking of the Latin translation of
the bible, says, 'If I find anything in it which appears
contrary to truth, I shall suppose nothing else than
that the copy is inaccurate, or the translator mistak-
en, or that I do not understand the passage.' (Ep. 97).

That the church fathers, however, did not adhere
strictly to the Greek and Jewish notions, but suppos-
ed that the inspired men were still in the complete
exercise of their own faculties, is manifest from sev-
eral passages of their writings. Thus Augustine, in
speaking of John, says, 'I dare say that perhaps
John himself did not speak the thing as it is, but as
he could; because he, a man, spoke concerning God,
and though inspired by God, was nevertheless a man.
Because an inspired man says not all which is, but
what man can say. (In Joh. Tr. 7).

DOCTRINE OF INSPIRATION. 209

Jerome on Gal. v. 12, says, 'It is no wonder if the
apostle, as a man, and still shut up in a vessel of flesh, .
should for once have said this.'

Origen comparing Luke iv. 1, and Acts ii. 4, where
it is said that Jesus and the apostles were full of the
Holy Spirit, observes, 'See that you do not suppose
the apostles to be equal to the Saviour; but know
that both Jesus and the apostles, and any other one
of the saints, is filled with the Holy Spirit, according
to the measure of each individual capacity.' (Horn,
in Lev. 29).

The church fathers were all agreed that the Holy
Scriptures contained the whole of the revealed w^ill
of God, and were the only infallible guide in matters
of faith and duty; and that they were written by
men fully inspired for the purpose, but still in the
exercise of their ordinary powers as men. In ad-
mitting this last idea, which is entirely scriptural, they
made a very important advance on the classic and
Jewish view^s; though they did not turn their atten-
tion particularly to the investigation of the mode or
the extent of inspiration.

During the subsequent ages, until the commence
ment of the Reformation, but little was done on the
subject of inspiration; for while the papal power
held unlimited sway, the bible wp^s only a secondarv
authority; audit v/as not of much practical impor-
tance whether it had originally been given by inspi-
ration or not, since the infallible pontiff was then the
only authoritative interpreter of the will of God.

18^

210 DOCTRINE OF INSPIRATION.

V. IDEAS OF THE REFORMERS AND THEIR SUCCESSORS.

When the authority of the pope began to be ques-
tioned, and the bible to be appealed to as the suffi-
cient and only rule of faith and practice, the ques-
tion of inspiration became one of vital importance;
and from that time to the present, it has been a subject
of earnest and zealous discussion, and it is only since
the reformation that we find very definite and com-
plete theories respecting the mode and extent of di-
vine inspiration. A few of the more important the-
ories are subjoined, premising that I understand by
theory a general statement made for the purpose of
systematizing a certain number of facts and account-
ing for their occurrence,

I. One of the earliest is, that the Holy Spirit dic-
tated the sacred books to the writers, word for word^
as we have them in the original languages. To this
opinion Ernesti adhered, and assigned as a reason,
that as thought cannot be communicated without
language, so, if the Holy Spirit communicated the
thoughts of the bible, he probably gave the words
also. Admitting the premises, I do not see how one
can avoid the conclusion.

But words are not in all cases necessary to the
communication of thought; the Spirit of God can
commune with the spirit of man without the inter-
vention of arbitrary signs; and to this theory of in-
spiration, there are the following very serious objec-
tions:

1, It is not needed to account for the facts. Many
of the statements of the bible are of such a kind,

DOCTRINE OF INSPIRATION. 211

that they could have been written just as well with-
out a verbal inspiration as with; and since it is the
whole object of a theory to make a statement which
will account for all the facts, a theory which goes so
much beyond facts, is unphilosophical.

2. The style of the bible is exceedingly various,
and each writer has his own peculiarities, and there
are the same characteristic diversities which we find
in any equal number of men uninspired.

3. The writers themselves claim no such inspira-
tion.

4. They quote from each other and from uninspir-
ed writers, and profess to make diligent use of all
the ordinary means of information within their reach.

5. When the writers of the New Testament quote
a passage of the Old, they seldom or never quote it
in the exact words of the original; and when two
writers quote the same passage, they never quote it
in precisely the same manner.

6. The different writers in giving an account of
the same transaction, always do it in different
langauge.

7. In exhibiting the same discourse, they always
do it in different language. (Compare p. 115, 116).

The truth of the above statements will be per-
fectly obvious to any one who compares the quota-
tions in the New Testament with the corresponding
passages in the Old; and who reads the gospels in a
harmony and compares the different accounts of the
same transactions and discourses.

II. Another theory is, that the great fundamental
truths only of the christian system were given by

212 DOCTRINE OF INSPIRATION.

inspiration; while the less important statements, the
arguments, the narratives, the illustrations, &c. are
of human origin. This was the sentiment of Dr.
Priestly, and is the theory of Unitarian and Socinian
writers generally. The objections to this are:

1. There is no definiteness or utility in it.
What are the fundamental truths of Christianity.

and which the less important statements? There
will be as many different answers to this question as
there are minds to answer it; and on this theory,
the most important question to be decided by reve-
lation, must be decided before revelation can be
consulted.

2. It entirely destroys the authority of the bible,
which claims to be an authoritative book in religious
matters; and therefore it cannot be true if the bible
itself be true.

III. Another theory is, that those parts of the bible,
whose moral tendency is obviously good, are to be
received as divinely inspired, and others not. This
sentiment is maintained by the German philosopher
Kant, and many of his followers.

The objections to it are:

1. It strips the bible of all authority; for indepen-
dently of the authority of revelation, no two men per-
haps would ever think alike as to the moral tendency
of all parts of the bible. It is nothing less than a con-
venient mode of acknowledging the inspiration of
the bible in general, and denying it entirely in all the
particulars.

2. It involves the absurdity of supposing, that the
great thing which revelation is intended to accom-

DOCTRINE OF INSPIRATION. 213

plish, that is, the communicating of right notions of
moral good, must be done without revelation, before
we can determine what is revelation, and what is
not.

IV. Another theory is, that those parts of the bible
which the writers expressly declare to be from God,
are to be regarded as divine, and the rest as human.

This is contrary to the whole view of the subject
given by the sacred writers themselves. In quoting
from each other and in enforcing their own state-
ments, they make no distinction of this kind, but say
expressly, ^^Aai all scripture is given by inspiration
of God, and is profitable for doctrine, (1 Tim. iii. 16),
and that holy men of God spake as they were moved
by the Holy Ghost (2 Pet. i. 21).

V. A more rational and consistent theory than
either of the preceding, is the one by Claude Frassen,
a Franciscan monk of the seventeenth century,
which was adopted by Dr. Doddridge, and which in
substance, has been the prevalent one ever since
among the best theologians, both Catholic and Pro-
testant. According to this theory, there are three
degrees of inspiration.

1. The first and highest is the revelation of things
before unknown to the sacred writers. This was
called inspiratio antecedens.

2. The second is, the perfect security against error
which God granted to the sacred writers, in the ex-
hibition of doctrines and facts with which they were
before acquainted, or inspiratio concomitans.

3 The third is divine authority conferred upon
writings originally composed without inspiration, by

214 DOCTRINE OF INSPIRATION.

the approbation of inspired men. This he called
inspiralio consequens.

This theory corresponds with all the facts, and
secures the authority of the bible. The only objec-
tion to it is its prolixity and needless minuteness.

VI. Another and still better, because more simple
theory is, that each of the sacred writers enjoyed
just so much of the divine influence as was necessary
to secure the particular purpose intended and no
more.

As this, however, is somewhat indefinite I much
prefer the following :

VII. The theory adopted by Michaelis and men-
tioned in chapter first, namely, a simple distinction
between i^evelation and inspiration.

Revelation is defined as the act of the Holy Spirit,
by which truths before unknown are communicated.

Inspiration, the act by w^hich not only new truths
are given, but by which men are excited to publish
for the instruction of others, truths already known,
and are guarded from all error in doing it.

Thus it was revealed to the ancient prophets that
the Messiah should come. But they were inspired to
publish this fact for the benefit of others. (Compare
p. 13-15)'.

The views of inspiration now most generally en-
tertained by evangelical theologians in this country
and England are, I suppose, in pretty exact accord-
ance with the following statements of Dr. Dwight
(Theol. ii. 371).

'The inspiration of the apostles I suppose to have
consisted in the following things:

DOCTRINE OF INSPIRATION. 215

1. That they received immediately from God every
part of the christian dispensation which they did not
know by other means.

2. That they were in the same manner furnished
with a foreknowledge of future events.

3. That in things which they did otherwise know
partially, the deficiencies of their knowledge were
in the same manner supplied.

4. That those things which they had once known
and which were parts of the christian dispensation,
were by divine power brought distinctly and fully to
their remembrance.

5. That they were directed by the Holy Spirit to
the selection of just such things, and such only, and
to precisely such a manner of exhibiting them, as
should be true, just, most useful to mankind, and most
agreeable to the divine wisdom.

6. That each one was left so far to his own man-
ner of writing or speaking, as that the style was
strictly his own; and yet that the phraseology used
by him in this very style, was so directed and con-
trolled by the Holy Spirit, as to lead him to the most
exact and useful exhibition of divine truth; his own
words being, in this important sense, words not de-
vised by human wisdom, but taught by the Holy
Ghost. And,

7. That each inspired man w^as, as to his preach-
ing or his writing, absolutely preserved from error.-

'All these particulars cannot be applied in the
same degree, and some of them cannot be applied at
ail, lo all the inspired preachers; but in my view,
every such preacher enjoyed the benefits of inspira-

216 DOCTRINE OF INSPIRATION.

tion so far as he needed them to enable him to preach
the gospel truly and usefully to mankind; so far as to
preserve him from false narratives, erroneous doc-
trines, and vi^rong or useless precepts.'

VI. CONCLUDING REMARKS.

In concluding, I would just allude to the question
which is sometimes asked, whether an inspired man
can distingish the thoughts which are given by inspi-
ration from those which arise in the natural opera-
tions of his own mind?

Undoubtedly he can, for this is necessary to pre-
vent his deceiving himself and others. But how?
The mode cannot be communicated to those who
have never been inspired — any more than the ideas
of a sixth sense^ or the mode in which pure spirits
communicate thought — to those who have but five
senses, and have never existed as disembodied spirits.

The reality, the benefit, and the absolute necessity
of inspiration are not at all affected by the variety of
theories adopted in respect to its mode and extent.
The most common and useful things are often the
most difficult of philosophical comprehension,andgive
rise to the most perplexing variety of theories.
What more simple, more common, more useful, or
more absolutely necessary, than light and heat? Yet
what more obstinately resists philosophical analysis?
What has given rise to a greater variety of contra-
dictory theories? What other subject in natural
philosophy has been less satisfactorily explained?

Will you, therefore, say that light and heat are
not useful? or that light and heat do not exist at all?

DOCTRINE OF INSPIRATION. 217

because natural philosophers have not yet hit upon
a theory which satisfactorily accounts for all the
phenomena which these substances exhibit!

On the subject of inspiration generally, and the
history of theories respecting it, consult Knapp's
Theology, translated by Leonard Woods, jr. vol. i.
pp. 108-130.

19

CHAPTER TWELFTH,

'SCRIPTURAL IDEA AND PROOF OF INSPIRATION.

I. SCRIPTURAL IDEA OF INSPIRATION.

In this chapter our investigations are confined en-
tirely to the bible itself, and all extraneous topics of
argument are excluded. The questions to be exam-
ined are, what idea does the bible give of its own
inspiration? and what proof does it exhibit of possess-
ing this inspiration?

The scriptural idea of inspiration is very simple,
and not embarrassed by any of the refinements of
metaphysical philosophy.

Inspiration, according to the bible is, just that mea-
sure of extraordinary divine influence^ afforded to the
sacred speakers and writers^ which was necessary to
secure the purpose intended^ and no more* If the pur-
pose were to excite them to write that with which
they were already well acquainted, just this degree of
influence was exerted. If there were the additional
purpose of bringing fresh to their recollection things
which had partly faded away, so much additional
influence was given. If explanations and more full
.developments of principles were needed, the Holy

INSPIRATION OF THE BIBLE. 219

Spirit gave the requisite illustrations. If truths be-
fore unknown, were to be communicated, the Holy
Spirit revealed them; and if future events were to
be foretold, the knowledge of them was imparted by
the same divine agent. So far also as the mode of
communicating was necessary to the accomplishment
of the purpose intended, this also was directed by the
Holy Spirit.

These extraordinary influences were imparted to
the sacred teachers to aid them in the discharge of
their official duties as teachers of religion, and to
secure the infallible communication of religious truth
through their instrumentality; while, in respect to
their strictly private and personal character, they
stood on the same ground and were liable to the
same errors, as other good men. The distinction
here is of great importance; and by those who will
give themselves the trouble to think, it can easily be
made.

Peter was inspired to preach the truth, and all his
religious teachings were entirely free from error;
but this extraordinary divine influence did not ex-
tend to his personal character, or regulate his con-
duct as an individual: otherwise he would not have
brought upon himself so severe a rebuke from his
divine master (Matthew xvi. 23); nor have denied
his Lord in the hour of his extremity; nor have been
guilty of dissimulation through fear of the Jewish
christians at Antioch (Gal. ii. 11-16). Paul and
Barnabas were inspired teachers of gospel truth, and
the doctrines they taught were free from all mixture
of error; but their inspiration did not prevent Bar-

220 INSPIRATION OF THE BIBLE.

nabas manifesting an undue partiality for his nephew
Mark, nor Paul being so much offend'cd by it as to
separate himself from his former associate in the
christian ministry. (Acts xv. 37-40, compare Col.
iv. 10).

Such is the scriptural idea of inspiration. It is not
necessary here to quote the passages illustrative oi
these statements, as they must all be exhibited and
discussed under the subsequent division.

II. SCRIPTURAL PROOF OF INSPIRATION.

For the sake of perspicuity I will present this
branch of the subject under several distinct heads.

1. Scriptural proof that the Founder of Christian-
ity was inspired^ and possessed divine authority.

The proof of this is found in the declarations
which Christ made, compared w^ith his general char-
acter, his predictions, and his miraculous works. He
publicly declared that he had received knowledge
of all religious truth directly from God, that he and
he alone was able to communicate to men a right
knowledge of God and of religious truth; and he
invites all to come to him as the only competent
religious teacher, and promises them full satisfaction
if they comply.

'All things are delivered unto me of my Father-;
and no man knoweth the Son, but the Father; neither
knoweth any man the Father, save the Son, and he
to whomsoever the Son will reveal him- Come unto
me, all ye that labor, and are heavy laden, and I will
give you rest. Take my yoke upon you, and learn
of me: for I am meek and lo-wly in. heart: and ya^

INSPIRATION OF THE BIBLE. 221

shall find rest unto your souls. For my yoke is easy,
and my burden is light' (Matt. xi. 27-30).

'For the Father loveth the Son, and showeth him
all things that himself doeth: and he will show him
greater works than these, that ye may marvel. For
as the Father raiseth up the dead, and quickeneth
them; even so the Son quickeneth whom he will.
For the Father judgeth no man; but hath committed
all judgment unto the Son: That all men should
honor the Son, even as they honor the Father. He
that honoreth not the Son, honoreth not the Father,
which hath sent him. Verily, verily, I say unto you^
He that heareth my word, and believeth on him
that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come
into condemnation; but is passed from death uato
life' (John v. 20-24).

' And the Father himself, which hath sent me, hathi
borne witness of me. Ye have neither heard his
voice at any time, nor seen his shape. And ye have
not his word abiding in you; for whom he hath sent,.
him ye believe not. Search the scriptures; for in
them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they
which testify of me. And ye will not come to me,
that ye might have life. I receive not honor from
men. But I know you, that ye have not the love of
God in you. I am come in my Father's name, and ye
receive me not: if another shall come in his own
name, him ye will receive' (John v. 37-43).

'Jesus said unto them. If God were your Father,

ye would love me: for I proceeded forth, and came

from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent me..

Why dp ye not understand my speech? even because

19*

22^ msPlRATION OF THE BIBLE.

ye cannot hear my word. Ye are of your father
the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do: he-
Was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not
itl the truth, because there is no truth in him. When
he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is
a liar, and the father of it. And because I tell you
the truth, ye believe me not. Which of you con-
vinceth me of sin? And if I say the truth, why do
ye not believe me? He that is of God, heareth God's
words; ye, therefore, hear them not, because ye are
not of God' (John viii. 42-47).

'Pilate, therefore, said unto him, Art thou a king,
thenT Jesus answered. Thou sayest that I am a king.
To this end was I born, and for this cause came I
into the world, that I should bear witness unto the
truth. Every one that is of the truth, heareth my
voice' (John xviii. 37). Compare also Matt, xxviii.
18; Luke X. 22; John xv. 21-25; xvi. 28; xvii. 2;
and many other texts of the same import.

In these and numerous other passages of the gos-
pels, Jesus declares in the most explicit and earnest
manner, that he is a teacher sent directly from God,
that he speaks the words of God, that whosoever
refuses to hear him, refuses to hear God; and that all
who are of God and have any sympathy with truth,
recognize at once in him the image of God and the
teacher of truth; that they who believed in him should
enjoy eternal life, while they who disbelieved should
suffer eternal death.

If Jesus were not an inspired teacher sent from
God, in making these repeated and solemn declara-
tions, he must either have been deceived himself, or

INSPIRATION OF tHK BIBLE. ^^S

he must have intended to deceive others; in other
words, he must have been a fanatic or an impostor.

Let us examine the character of Jesus and com-
pare it with his declarations, and judge whether he
be justly liable to the suspicion either of fanaticism
or intentional deception. In the first place, what
evidence is there that Jesus was under the influence
of fanaticism? The distinguishing features of fanat-
icism are strongly marked, and are the same in every
age. One of these is extravagance, particularly that
species of it usually denominated ultraism. Some
one idea is seized upon to the exclusion of every thing
else, taken apart from all its connections, and driven
to the extreme. Another feature of fanaticism is
unreasonableness; a pertinacious refusal to examine,
except from one particular point of view, and an
obstinate determination to admit no considerations
tending in the least degree to modify the favorite
opinion. A third feature is uncharitableness, which
exhibits itself in harsh and severe denunciations
against useful and estimable men, who will not fall
in with the fanatic train, and more unsparing and
angry censure of them than of the notoriously and
obstinately wicked. The reason is, that such men
offer a much stronger barrier to the progress of fanat-
icism than the wicked can do.

Another characteristic trait of fanaticism is found
in its exhorbitant expectations and its corresponding
demands "upon the credulity and implicit submission
of its followers. Finally, imperfect views of moral
obligation furnish an indubitable mark of fanaticism.

224 INSPIRATION OF THE BIBLE.

Fanatics always have some weak points of moral
character. Frequently they have been lascivious.
Almost always they manifest disregard to truth; for,
being governed by the imagination rather than the
judgment, their representations are all tinged by the
predominant fancy, whatever it may be. Particu-
larly in respect to every thing which obstructs their
favorite plans or tends to promote them, they seem
almost incapable of speaking or even perceiving the
simple truth, without slander on the one hand or flat-
tering exaggeration on the other.

Was there any thing of all this in the character of
Jesus? On the contrary, w^hat enlarged conceptions,
what comprehensiveness of intellectual vision, what
clear and rational views of every subject on which
he spoke ! There is a character of wonderful com-
pleteness and entireness to all his ideas, which is
utterly inconsistent with the supposition of fanati-
cism.

Again, how tender, and charitable, and patient was
he in rebuking the feelings of sincerely virtuous men,
like his own disciples, and the amiable young man
who vainly imagined that he had kept all the law
from his youth; and severe only against the notori-
ously and boldly wicked! So perfect also were his
views of moral obligation, that nothing which is in
the least degree vicious ever received from him, un-
der any circumstances, a moment's countenance or
indulgence.

How moderate too were his expectations! So far
was he from anticipating personal influence and high
success, that from an early period of his ministry he

INSPIRATION OF THE BIBLE. 225

predicted nothing but indignity, cruelty and death to
himself, and gave a most severe reproof to Peter for
deprecating such a result.

'From that time forth began Jesus to show unto
his disciples, how that he must go unto Jerusalem,
and sufier many things of the elders and chief priests,
and scribes, and be killed, and be raised again the
third day. Then Peter took him, and began to re-
buke him, saying, Be it far from thee. Lord: this
shall not be unto thee. But he turned, and said unto
Peter, Get thee behind me, Satan ; thou art an offence
unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of
God, but those that be of men' (Matt. xvi. 21-23).

He even assured his disciples that his own personal
success would be small, and theirs would be great in
comparison with his.

'Verily, verily, 1 say unto you, he that believeth
on me, the works that I do, shall he do also, and
greater works than these shall he do; because I go
unto my Father' (John xiv. 1 2).

And when the indignities and sufferings actually
came upon him, no expressions of impatience or dis-
appointment escaped his lips, but silently and quietly
he submitted to them all as events which he had long
anticipated and never expected to avoid. 'He was
oppressed and he was afflicted, yet he opened not his
mouth; he is brought as a lamb to the slaughter, and
as a sheep before her shearers is dumb, so he openeth
not his mouth' (Isaiah liii. 7).

Compare the character of Christ with that of fana-
tics, all the world over, and they are perfect contrasts.

226 INSPIRATION OF THE BIBLE.

Who that has any knowledge of fanaticism, will pre-
tend to say that Jesus was a fanatic?

Was Jesus, then, on the other hand, an impostor?
For what purpose was he an impostor? and what
shadow of evidence does his life afford that such was
his character?

He refused every offer of personal benefit, and
studiously suppressed every rising of popularity
(John vi. 15); anticipated from the beginning all the
indignities and cruelties that awaited him (Matt. xx.
17-19; Mark x. 32-34), and at last quietly submit-
ted himself to them without the least expression of
disappointment or regret. The entire benevolence
and devotedness of his whole course of life; his an-
xiety to avoid parade and popular applause; his un-
exampled simplicity of character; do these show him
to be an impostor? He who can believe this, shows
more credulity than he who can believe the legends
of the Talmud and the Koran.

If, then, Jesus were neither a fanatic nor an impos-
tor, he was divinely inspired; for we have seen be-
fore that he laid claim to such inspiration une-
quivocally, publicly, and without any reserve.

The predictions of Christ, also, prove his divine
inspiration. To these he himself appeals as evidence
on this point. To his disciples he said, after predict-
ing his own death,

'And now I have told you before it come to pass,
that, when it is come to pass, ye might believe'
(John xir. 29).

And again :

' But these things have I told you, that^ when the

INSPIRATION OP THE BIBLE. 227

time shall come, ye may remember that I told you of
them' (John xvi. 4),

While on his way to Jerusalem to attend his last
festival there, he gave his disciples a circumstantial
account of the death that awaited him, and the tri-
umphal resurrection which should succeed.

' Then he took unto him the twelve, and said unto
them. Behold, we go up to Jerusalem, and all things
that are written by the prophets concerning the Son
of man shall be accomplished. For he shall be de-
livered unto the Gentiles, and shall be mocked, and
spitefully entreated, and spitted on: And they
shall scourge him, and put him to death: and the
third day he shall rise again' (Luke xviii. 31-33.
Compare Matt. xx. 17-19, and Mark x. 32-34). His
enemies remembered these predictions, and took pre-
cautions against their fulfilment. These precautions
happily precluded the possibility of deception, and
thus resulted in the complete establishment of the
divine authority of Christ and the confusion of his
enemies.

'Now the next day that followed the day of the pre-
paration, the chief priests and Pharisees came together
unto Pilate, saying, sir, we remember that that de-
ceiver said, while he was yet alive, after three days
I will rise again. Command therefore that the sepul-
chre be made sure until the third day, lest his disci-
ples come by night, and steal him away, and say unto
the people, he is risen from the dead: so the last error
shall be worst than the first. Pilate said unto them,
Ye have a watch: go your way, make it as sure as
ye can. So they went and made the sepulchre sure,

228 INSPIRATION OF THE BIBLE.

sealing the stone, and setting a watch. (Matt, xxvii.
62-66).

Thus the wise were taken in their own craftiness;
and when the event turned their own machinations
against themselves, they found no way to avoid the
consequences but by bribery and complicated false-
hood.

'Now when they were going, behold, some of the
watch came into the city, and showed unto the chief
priests all the things that were done. And when they
were assembled with the elders, and had taken coun-
sel, they gave large money unto the soldiers: saying,
say ye, his disciples came by night, and stole him
away while we slept. And if this come to the gov-
ernor's ears, we will persuade him, and secure you.
So they took the money, and did as they were taught:
and this saying is commonly reported among the
Jews until this day' (Matt, xxviii. 11-15, compare
vs. 2-4).

His early and frequent predictions respecting the
treachery of Judas, when his conduct was such that
the other disciples, though his intimate associates,
had no suspicion of him more than of any other one
of the twelve, are unquestionable proofs of divine
foreknowledge.

'Jesus answered them. Have not I chosen you
twelve, and one of you is a devil? He spake of Ju-
das Iscariot, the son of Simon; for he it was that
should betray him, being one of the twelve' (John
vi. 70-71).

The effect of the announcement to the disciples
at the last supper, of the fact that one of them would
prove a traitor, and the painful suspicion which each

INSPIRATION OF THE BIBLE. ^29

one appears to have had of himself rather than of
Judas, is particularly worthy of notice.

' Now when the even was come, he sat down with
the twelve. And as they did eat, he said. Verily I
say unto you, that one of you shall betray me. And
they were exceeding sorrowful, and began every one
of them to say unto him. Lord, is it I? And he an-
swered and said, he that dippeth his hand with me
in the dish, the same shall betray me. The Son of
man indeed goeth, as it is written of him: but wo
to that man by whom the Son of man is betrayed!
good were it for that man, if he had never been born.
Then Judas, which betrayed him, answered and said,
Master, is it I? He said unto him, thou hast said'
(Matt. xxvi. 20-25, compare Mark xiv. 17-21; Luke
xxii. 21-23; John xiii. 21-30).

The full and circumstantial prophecies respecting
the destruction of Jerusalem and the succeeding
events, when compared with the history of the Jew-
ish war by Josephus, afford the most satisfactory evi-
dence of divine foreknowledge.' (Matt, xxiv; Mark
xiii; Luke xxi.)

The miracles of Christ are an unanswerable proof
of his divine authority, and he himself frequently
appeals to them as such.

'Now, when John had heard in the prison the
works of Christ, he sent two of his disciples, an i
said unto him. Art thou he that should come, or do
we look for another? Jesus answered and said unto
them. Go, and show John again those things which
ye do hear and see: the blind receive their sight, and
the lame walk; the lepers are cleansed, and the deaf
20

230 INSPIRATION OF THE BIBLE.

hear; the dead are raised up, and the poor have the
aospel preached to them; and blessed is he, whoso-
ever shall not be offended in me' (Matt xi. 2-6, com-
pare Luke vii. 18-23).

He makes similar appeals to strengthen the faith
of his desponding disciples.

'Believest thou not, that I am in the Father, and
the Father in me? The words that I speak unto you,
I speak not of myself: but the Father, that dwelleth
in me, he doeth the works. Believe me that I am in
the Father, and the Father in me: or else believe me
for the very works' sake' (John xiv. 10, 11).

In the same manner he shows the entire inexcusa-
bleness of those who persisted in their unbelief.

'If I had not done among them the works which
none other man did, they had not had sin: but now
have they both seen and hated both me and my
Father' (John xv. 24).

•But I have greater witness than that of John; for
the works which the Father hath given me to finish,
the same works that I do, bear witness of me, that
the Father hath sent me' (John v. 36).

The miracles here referred to, and which are re-
corded in the gospels, show the most entire and be-
nevolent control of nature, such as the Creator only
or one authorized by him, can exert; and they are of
such a kind, so publicly perfoimed and in such a
variety of circumstances, that the possibility of de-
ception or mistake is entirely excluded. The whole
subject of miracles will be particularly considered
in the next chapter; and Dr. Paley has discussed the
credibility of the christian miracles with his usual

INSPIRATION OF THE BIBLE. 231

judgment, acuteness and candor, in his Evidences
(Preparatory Considerations; Proposition i. chap. 6-
8, and Proposition ii.), to which I refer the reader.

Such is an outline of the evidence which we have
of the divine authority of the Founder of the chris-
tian religion; and this being established, it is easy to
prove the divine inspiration of the several writers of
the bible.

2. Scriptural proof that the apostles and other lori-
ters of the New Testament were divinely inspired.

The proof of this rests primarily on the declara-
tions of Christ, that they should have the infallible
guidance of the Holy Spirit in regard to all the reli-
gious truths which they were to communicate.

'But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom
the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you
all things, and bring all things to your remembrance,
whatsoever I have said unto you' (John xiv. 25).

'Nevertheless, I tell you the truth; it is expedient
for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the
Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I
will send him unto you. Howbeit, w'hen he, the
Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all
truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatso-
ever he shall hear, that shall he speak ; and he will
show you things to come' (John xvi. 7, 13).

The promise is absolute and unconditional in refer-
ence to all their official duties as religious teachers;
and it extends not only to the matter of the truth to
be communicated, but also, when necessary, to the
very mode of conveying it; for they were to be
divinely taught both what and how they should speak.

232 INSPIRATION OF THE BIBLE.

'But when they deliver you up, take no thought
how or what ye shall speak ; for it shall be given you
in that same hour what ye shall speak. For it is not
ye that speak, but the Spirit of your Father which
speaketh in you' (Matt. x. 19, 20).

'And when they bring you unto the synagogues,
and unto magistrates and powers, take ye no thought,
how, or what thing ye shall answer, or what ye shall
say: for the Holy Ghost shall teach you in the same
hour, what ye ought to say' (Luke xii. 11-12, com-
pare also xxi. 14, 15; and Mark xiii. 11).

It cannot be objected to the inspiration of the
general preaching of the apostles, that these promises
are confined to the defence which they were to make
when called before magistrates to answer for their
religious instructions; for if we look into Acts we
shall find that in every instance where they were call-
ed upon to defend themselves before the civil or ec-
clesiastical authorities, they did but repeat the in-
structions which they had given to the people, and
preached to the magistrates the doctrines of the gos-
pel. On the ground of the objection, therefore, the
instructions they gave the people have the sanction
of infallible divine authority' (Compare Acts iv. 1-13;
xxiv. 10-21 ; xvii. xxii. xxvi).

The apostles declared themselves to be inspired,
and attributed their instructions to the direct influ-
ence of the Holy Spirit.

'For it seemed good to the Holy Ghost, and to us,
to lay upon you no greater burden than these neces-
sary things' (Acts xv. 28).

INSPIRATION OF THE BIBLE. 233

Paul uniformly attributes his religious knowledge
and his authority to teach to the same divine agent.

'But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear
heard, neither have entered into the heart of man,
the things which God hath prepared for them that
love him. But God hath revealed them unto us by
his Spirit: for the Spirit searchethall things, yea, the
deep things of God. For what man knoweth the
things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in
him ? even so, the things of God knoweth no man,
but the Spirit of God. Now w^e have received, not
the spirit of the world, but the Spirit which is of
God; that we might know the things that are freely
given to us of God. Which things also we speak,
not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but
which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual
things with spiritual' (1 Cor. ii. 10-13).

'If ye have heard of the dispensation of the grace
of God, which is given me to you-ward. How that
by revelation he made known unto me the mystery'
(Eph. iii. 2, 3).

He even asserts that he received the whole of his
knowledge from this source, and had no aid wiiatever
from those who had been apostles before him.

'But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which
was preached of me, is not after man: for I n-either
received it of man, neither w^as I taught it, but by
the revelation of Jesus Christ. But w^hen it pleased
God, who separated me from my mother's womb, and
called me by his grace, to reveal his Son in me, that
I might preach him among the heathen ; immediately
I conferred not with flesh and blood: neither went 1
20*

234 INSPIRATION OF THE BIBLE.

up to Jerusalem to them which were apostles before
me;- but I went into Arabia, and returned again unto
Damascus' (Gal. i. 11, 12, 15-17).

Speaking also of his second journey to Jerusalem,
and his seeing the other apostles there, he says:

'But of those, who seemed to be somewhat: (what-
soever they were, it maketh no matter to me: God
accepteth no man's person:) for they who seemed to
be somewhat, in conference added nothing to me'
(Gal. ii. 6).

The apostle Peter gives his sanction to the epistles
of Paul, and attributes to them the same authority
which the other scriptures possess.

'And account that the long-suffering of our Lord is
salvation ; even as our beloved brother Paul also, ac-
cording to the wisdom given unto him, hath written
unto you; as also in all his epistles, speaking in them
of these things; in which are some things hard to be
understood, which they that are unlearned and un-
stable, wrest, as they do also the other scriptures,
unto their own destruction' (2 Pet. iii. 15, 16).

The apostles wrought miracles in attestation of
their claims as divinely inspired teachers. These
miracles were of the same kind as those which the
Saviour himself had wrought, and they had received
from him a special commission for their performance,
for the very purpose of testing the truth and authori-
ty of their instructions. In his last interview with
the disciples, 'he said unto them. Go ye into all the
world, and preach the gospel to every creature. He
that believeth and is baptized, shall be saved; but he
that believeth not, shall be damned. And these

INSPIRATION OF THE BIBLE. 335

signs shall follow them that believe ; in my name shall
they cast out devils; they shall speak with new
tongues; they shall take up serpents; and if they
drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them; they
shall lay hands on the sick, and they shall recover'
(Mark xvi. 15-18).

Throughout the book of Acts we observe the ful-
filment of this promise.

'And by the hands of the apostles were many signs
and wonders wrought among the people: insomuch,
that they brought forth the sick into the streets, and
laid them on beds and couches, that, at the least,
the shadow of Peter passing by, might overshadow
some of them. There came also a multitude out of
the cities round about, unto Jerusalem, bringing sick
folks, and them which were vexed with unclean
spirits: and they were healed every one' (Acts v.
12, 15, 16).

'Then Philip went down to the city of Samaria,
and preached Christ unto them. And the people with
one accord gave heed unto those things which Philip
spake, hearing and seeing the miracles which he did.
For unclean spirits, crying with a loud voice, came
out of many that were possessed with them; and
many taken with palsies, and that were lame, were
healed. And there was great joy in that city' (Acts
viii. 5-8).

'And God wrought special miracles by the hands
of Paul: so that from his body were brought unto
the sick, handkerchiefs or aprpns, and the diseases
departed from them, and the evil spirits went out of

236 INSPIRATION OF THE BIBLE.

them' (Acts xix. 11-12, compare also xiii. 8-12; xiv,
8-10; xvi. 18; xix. 12; xxviii. 8, 9).

It is manifest also, that other preachers who were
not apostles, possessed similar miraculous powers.
(1 Cor. xii. 1-11, and many other passages).

The writings of the apostles possess the same au-
thority as their oral instructions. Many of the pas-
sages quoted above, which assert inspiration in the
most direct and explicit manner, refer expressly to
written and not to oral teaching. Such are Acts xv*
28; Eph. iii. 3; 2 Pet. iii. 15. 16. Paul writes to
one of the churches:

'Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the tra-
ditions which ye have been taught, whether by word
or our epistle' (2 Thess. ii. 15).

The comprehensive powers conferred by Christ on
Peter, and on the whole company of the apostles,
plainly include authoritative teaching by written
communications.

'And I will give unto thee the keys of the king-
dom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on
earth, shall be bound in heaven; and whatsoever thou
shalt loose on earth, shall be loosed in heaven' (Matt,
xvi. 19).

' Verily I say unto you. Whatsoever ye shall bind
on earth, shall be bound in heaven; and whatsoever
ye shall loose on earth, shall be loosed in heaven'
(Matt, xviii. 18).

It is obvious, also, from the very nature of the
case, that the writings of the apostles possess the
same authority as their oral instructions. If they
could speak truth infallibly, they could also write it

INSPIRATION OF THE BIBLE. 237

infallibly. The promises are not restricted to one
mode of communication; but apply to instructions
communicated in any mode. If it were necessary
that evanescent oral teaching should be inspired,
much more is it necessary that written instructions
should be so, which are permanent in their influence
and designed for the religious education of all future-
generations.

So far as the testimony of the bible goes, the divine
authority of the apostolic teachings, whether oral or
written, stands on precisely the same ground with
that of the instructions of Christ himself* He gives
to them all the authority of his own unequivocal
sanction, in the passages already quoted; and even
declares that their knowledge should be increased
after his ascension, and that their teachings should on
some points be more full and plain than his own.

' I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye
cannot bear them now. Howbeit when he, the-
Spirit of truth is come, he shall guide you into all
truth: he shall glorify me, for he shall receive of
mine and shall show it unto you' (John xvi. 12-14).

They declared themselves to be in full possession
of this authority, and sustained their claims by the
same sort of miracles which Christ had wrought to
sustain his; and the bible nowhere recognizes any
difference in this respect.

It may be said that Mark and Luke were not apos-
tles, and that their writings, therefore, cannot have
the same authority as the other parts of the New
Testament.

238 INSPIRATION OF THE BIBLE.

We have already seen that the companions of the
apostles, under apostolic superintendence, had the
power of working miracles and of authoritative
teaching. Besides, we have historical testimony that
the writings of Mark and Luke received the sanction
of Peter and Paul, and were thus invested with apos-
tolic authority.

'Mark was the disciple and interpreter of Peter,
and having written down the things which Peter
preached, he delivered them to us' (Irenaeus, adv.
Haer. iii. 1).

'The methodized narrative of Luke is usually as-
cribed to Paul.' — 'What the disciples promulgated,
may be considered the work of their masters' (Ter-
tullian, adv. Marc. iv. 5; compare also pages 126-
128 of this volume).

If any one doubts the apostleship of Paul and his
authority to give such a sanction, on the ground that
he was not one of the personal attendants of our
Lord, let his own language repel the objection.

'Am I not an apostle? am I not free? have I not
seen Jesus Christ our Lord? are not ye my work in
the Lord? If I be not an apostle unto others, yet
doubtless I am to you : for the seal of mine apostle-
ship are ye in the Lord' (1 Cor. ix. 1, 2).

'For I suppose I was not a whit behind the very
chiefest apostles. Truly the signs of an apostle were
wrought among you in all patience, in signs and won-
ders and mighty deeds' (2 Cor. xi. 5; xii. 12).

The personal character of the apostles, their pru-
dence, their moral integrity, their disinterestedness,
their enlightened, benevolent and consistent course

INSPIRATION OF THE BIBLE. $39

of life, frees them, as it does their divine master,frorn
all just suspicion of fanaticism or imposture; and
connected with the other proof already adduced,
fully establishes their claim to divine authority.

It has sometimes been objected, that Paul, in refer-
ence to a few topics in one chapter, expressly dis-
claims authoritative inspiration. (1 Cor vii. 6, 12, 25,
40, compare verse 10). This is a decisive proof that
he assumed divine authority in all cases in which he
did not expressly disclaim it; for it is evident from all
his epistles that he was always so understood; and
otherwise, it would not have been necessary for him
so carefully to disclaim it in these particular instances.
If a civil officer should advise a community, as a
friend, to a particular course respecting which the
law had made no express provision, and in doing it,
should disclaim all idea of official interference, would
that disclaimer divest him of legal authority in cases
which came under the express provisions of the law?
The case supposed is precisely analogous to that of
Paul; and that he intends his disclaimer to be strictly
limited to the particular things specified, is manifest
from his emphatic resumption of apostolic authority
in the same chapter, in a case in which he had re*
ceived an express injunction from the Lord.

'And unto the married I command, yet not I but
the Lord, Let not the wife depart from her husband'
(1 Cor. vii. 10).

It is sometimes objected that Paul in one case, in-
troduces himself speaking as a fool (2 Cor. xi. 21,
23; xii. 11). Can he be supposed to have authorita-
tive inspiration in such cases?

I

S40 INSPIRATION OF THE BIBLE.

A bare inspection of the passages shows, that the
course of reasoning there is similar to that pursued
in Romans iii. where objeetions are introduced and
answers given; and if an objection could be stated
under the influence of inspiration, so also under the
same influence could the vain-glorious boasting of
false apostles be held up to deserved contempt by
contrast with the labors and sufferings, the merits
and the humility of a Paul. If Paul became a fool
by glorying^ how much greater fools were they who
gloried more without a tithe of his reasons for so
doing!

It is sometimes objected, that some of the direc-
tions in the epistles are minute, trifling, and could be
given as well without inspiration as with it. For
example, the direction which Paul gives Timothy
respecting his cloak, books, and parchment' (2 Tim.
iv. 13).

No intelligent defender of the inspiration of the
bible will admit that inspiration is given where it is
not needed (compare pages 13-15 of this volume);
and the objection assumes what is by no means the
fact, that the articles, to which Paul alludes, were of
small importance to him during the approaching
winter (2 Tim. iv. 21).

His miraculous powers would not shield him from
the cold of winter, nor furnish him with clothing for
his comfort, nor books for his entertainment and in-
struction, nor parchment for the convenience of his
extensive correspondence; and we have no reason
to suppose that he had an abundance of money to

INSPIRATION OF THE BIBLE. 241

provide himself with such articles in every new place
to which he might come.

It is sometimes objected that one at least of the
inspired books of the New Testament has been lost.
(Col. iv. 16). Admitting that the apostle Paul wrote
an inspired epistle to the Laodiceans, there is no
proof that it was designed to answer any other than
a local and temporary purpose, or that there was any
necessity of its being preserved for the use of pos-
terity. Had there been any such necessity, it is
probable that the same divine care which preserved
the other books of the New Testament would also
have preserved this. Very many of the inspired oral
discourses of our Lord and the apostles w^ere never
written down, and can never be recovered (John xx.
30 5 xxi. 25); but what has been lost neither weakens
the evidence nor diminishes the value of what has
been preserved. All has been preserved which God
ever intended to be preserved, or which is necessary
to accomplish the purposes for which the bible is
given: as is evident from the fact, that the New Tes-
tament, as we now have it, fully developes a system
of faith and practice, which is in all its parts complete,
symmetrical and well proportioned.

3. Scriptural proof of the divine inspiration of the
Old Testament,

We might proceed here in the same manner as wc
have with the New Testament, and introduce the
express declarations of the inspired writers under the
old dispensation (compare Exod. iv. 12, 15, 16; Deut.
xviii. 18; Isa. vi. 6-8; Jer. i. 6-10; Ezek vi. 1; vii.
1 ; Amos iii. 7, and many other passages), confirmed
21

242 INSPIRATION OF THE BIBLE.

as these declarations were by the character of the
writers, their predictions and miracles. But as we
have already established the divine authority of the
New Testament, the more direct and satisfactory
mode of proof will be to confirm the inspiration of
the Old Testament by the authority of the New.

Christ himself gave to the Old Testament his full
sanction as the word of God, and, in all respects, of
divine authority. The prominent events of his own
history, he asserts, were divinely foretold in the Old
Testament.

'The Son of man goeth, as it is written of him:
but wo unto that man by whom the Son of man is
betrayed! it had been good for that man if he had not
been born. Then saith Jesus unto them, All ye shall be
ofiended because of me this night: for it is written,
I will smite the shepherd, and the sheep of the flock
shall be scattered abroad' (Matt. xxvi. 24, 31).

* For I say unto you, That this that is written must
yet be accomplished in me. And he was reckoned
among the transgressors: for the things concerning
me have an end' (Luke xxii. 37).

He explained to his disciples the predictions of the
Old Testament concerning himself, and severely re-
buked them for not more readily apprehending and
believing these predictions.

' Then he said unto them, O fools, and slow of heart
to believe all that the prophets have spoken! Ought
not Christ to have suffered these things, and to enter
into his glory? And beginning at Moses, and all the
prophets, he expounded unto them, in all the scrip-
tures, the things concerning himself.

INSPIRATION OF THE BIBLE. 243

And he said unto them, These are the words which I
spake unto you, while I was yet with you, that all things
must be fulfilled which were written in the law of
Moses, and in the prophets, and in the psalms, concern-
ing me. Then opened he their understanding, that
they might understand the scriptures, and said unto
them, Thus it is written, and thus it behoved Christ to
suffer' (Luke xxiv. 25-27, 44-46).

Compare also Matthew iv, 4, 7, 10; v. 17, 18, and
many other passages.

The apostles also gave the same sanction to the
Old Testament as possessing divine authority. All
their writings and discourses, which have been pre-
served, contain numerous quotations from the ancient
scriptures as the authoritative word of God, and there
is nowhere the least intimation that the inspiration
of the ancient writers was at all inferior to their
own; on the contrary, they always appeal to them
as the highest authority for the confirmation of their
own statements. Compare the discourses of the apos-
tles recorded in Acts, also 1 Cor. ix. 8-10; x. 1-11;
2 Pet. iii. 15, 16.

The epistles to the Galatians and Hebrews were
written to those who set too high a value upon the
old dispensation and underrated the new; and it is
the object of these epistles to convince them of this
error, and to bring them to a proper appreciation of
the relative excellence of the two covenants. If
then the Old Testament were in any respect of in-
ferior authority to the New, the most direct mode of
accomplishing the apostle's purpose would have been
the declaration and proof of this fact; but instead of

244 INSPIRATION OF THE BIBLE.

doing this, he everywhere assumes and asserts the
entire divinity and plenary inspiration of the Old
Testament, and sustains the divinity of the New by
the divine authority of the Old. He certainly could
not hope to destroy an injurious prejudice by accom-
modating himself to it, and cherishing and encourag-
ing it; and as an honest teacher of religion he could
not have given the sanction of his own inspiration to
that which had no claim to divine authority.

Among the numerous declarations of the New Tes-
tament which assert the divine authority of the Old,
the following are particularly worthy of notice:

'But continue thou in the things which thou hast
learned, and hast been assured of, knowing of whom
thou hast learned them. And that from a child thou
hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to
make thee wise unto salvation, through faith which
is in Christ Jesus. All scripture is given by inspira-
tion of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof,
for correction, for instruction in righteousness; that
the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished
unto all good w^orks' (2 Tim. iii. 14-17).

The whole of this refers to the Old Testament, for
these are the only scriptures that were in existence
when Timothy w^as a child. The apostle asserts that
the whole of the Old Testament is divinely inspired,
and of the highest use and authority to the christian
teacher, adapted to make him wise unto salvation, and
fitted to make him perfect as a teacher of religion,
thoroughly furnished unto all good works.

The other passage is from Peter.

'We have also a more sure word of prophecy;

INSPIRATION OF THE BIBLE. 245

whereunto ye do well that ye take heed, as unto a
light that shineth in a dark place, until the day dawn,
and the day-star arise in your hearts : knowing this
first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any pri-
vate interpretation. For the prophecy came not in
old time by the will of man; but holy men of God
spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost' (2
Pet. i. 19-21).

The apostle Peter here asserts, that the predictions
of the Old Testament respecting the Messiah had
been uttered, not by human sagacity, but by the di-
rect suggestion of the Spirit of God; so entirely were
they of divine origin that the prophets themselves,
who were the instruments to utter them, were not
able to interpret them in all the fulness of their
meaning, that this could be ascertained fully only by
the event; and it w^as therefore a more sure word of
prophecy to the christians in Peter's time than it had
been to the ancient prophets themselves. (See Bret-
schneider's N. T. Lexicon, vol. i. p. 469).

As illustrative and confirmatory of the positive
evidence for the divine inspiration and authority of
the Old Testament, it will be interesting to contem-
plate for a moment, the very singular moral position
which these sacred books of the Hebrew nation held
in the midst of the ancient pagan world.

The sacred books of all other ancient nations we
find encouraging polytheism, those of the Hebrews
enjoining a simple and severe theism: all other sacred
books enjoining the worship of images, these strictly
and with terrible sanctions prohibiting it. This pe-
culiarity, which we should suppose would strongly
21*

246 INSPIRATION OF THE BIBLE.

recommend them to every enlightened mind of the
ancient world, is noticed without being approved by-
Tacitus, the most profound and severely philosophi-
cal of all the ancient historians; so completely had
the absurdities of polytheism and idolatory interwov-
en themselves with the ideas of religion in the most
cultivated minds of the ancient world. The Jews
concur with the Egyptians, says Tacitus, 'in their
notions of an infernal world; but far different is their
persuasion about celestial things. The Egyptians
offer divine worship to several brute animals, to ima-
ges, and the works of art. The Jews acknowledge
but one God, to be conceived and adored by the
mind only. For profane and unhallowed they hold
all such as out of materials mortal and perishing use
to fashion. their gods after the likeness of men; they
affirm that the Divine Being, eternal and supreme, is
immutable and forever incapable of decay. No ima-
ages, therefore, are seen in their cities, much less do
they admit them in their temples. This flattery they
allow not to kings, nor this honor to the Caesars.'
(Tacitus, Hist. v. 5).

All other sacred books separate morals from reli-
gion, those of the Hebrews most intimately conjoin
them; others make gross immoralities a part of their
worship, these require the most entire purity of
thought and practice. Other ancient religions en-
courage hostile feeling towards all nations but their
own; the Hebrew religion enjoins the utmost benevo-
lence and hospitality to the stranger and foreigner.

'Thou shalt neither vex a stranger nor oppress him;
for ye vrcre strangers in the land of Egypt. Also

INSPIRATION OF THE BIBLE. 247

thou shalt not oppress a stranger, for ye know the
heart of a stranger, seeing ye were strangers in the
land of Egypt' (Exod. xxii. 21; xxiii. 9).

What more affecting appeal could possibly be made
to awaken all their benevolent feeling?

All other ancient religions encouraged and sustain-
ed slavery; the Hebrew alone made laws which sof-
tened all its harsher features and secured its final ex-
tinction.

'He that stealeth a man and selleth him, or if he
be found in his hand, he shall surely be put to death.
If a man smite the eye of his servant or the eye of
his maid, that it perish, he shall let him go free for his
eye's sake; and if he smite out his man-servant's
tooth, or his maid-servant's tooth, he shall let him go
free for his tooth's sake' (Exod. xxi. 16, 26, 27).

'If thy brother, an Hebrew man or an Hebrew
woman, be sold unto thee, and serve thee six years,
then in the seventh year thou shalt let him go free
from thee. And when thou sendest him out free from
thee, thou shalt not let him go away empty: thou
shalt furnish him liberally out of thy flock, and out of
thy floor, and out of thy wine-press: of that where-
with the Lord thy God hath blessed thee shalt thou
give unto him. And thou shalt remember that thou
wast a bondman in the land of Egypt, and the Lord
thy God redeemed thee: therefore I command thee
this thing to-day' (Deut. xv. 12-15).

' Thou shalt not deliver unto his master the servant
that is escaped from his master unto thee: he shall
dwell with thee, even among you, in that place which
he shall choose in one of thy gates, where it liketh

248 INSPIRATION OF THE BIBLE.

him best: thou shalt not oppress him' (Deut xxiii.
15, 16).

Only one of the above regulations has exclusive
reference to Hebrew servants; the others are of uni-
versal application.

The evils of slavery could scarcely be known in a
community where such laws were in force; and even
the legal forms of involuntary servitude would speed-
ily become obsolete, as they actually did in the He-
brew nation.

Other ancient religions elevated the few at the ex-
pense of the multitude, the Hebrew carefully provid-
ed for universal elevation ; other religions, particularly
in Asia, supported the most absolute despotism, the
Hebrew entirely prohibited it, and enjoined it on the
people to govern themselves. We have a remarkable
illustration of the free spirit of the Hebrew people,
in the history of Ahab, the most tyrannical of the
Israelitish kings. He wished to purchase the patri-
mony of one of his subjects, but the subject refused
to sell it at any price; and thepossibility of obtaining
it by unlawful or forcible measures did not occur to
the disappointed king, tyrant as he was. His pagan
wife, Jezebel of Tyre, undertook the task; and even
she was obliged to accomplish it by subornation of
perjury rather than direct force; and speedily the
whole royal family were made bitterly to rue their
injustice (1 Kings xxi).

The religions of other ancient nations encouraged
war, and made it the great and almost the only hon-
orable employment of man, but the Hebrew religion
enacted laws which made it almost impossible to car-

INSPIRATION OF THE BIBLE. 249

ry on war: and to prevent offensive wars the raising
of horses was strictly prohibited (Deut. xvii. 16;
Isa. ii. 7, compare 1 Kings x. 25, 26, 28, 29). The
laws and institutions of the Hebrews were all design-
ed to make them a peaceful and agricultural people;
and this is the more remarkable as they could gain
possession of the promised land only by a bloody and
obstinate conflict. From cowardly slaves they were
to be made invincible soldiers; and then from invin-
cible soldiers they were immediately to become quiet
and laborious husbandmen: a twofold transition
scarcely to be expected without divine interposition.

The follow^ing extracts from the military laws of
the Hebrews will show the impossibility of their en-
gaging extensively in foreign wars, while the Mosaic
code remained in force.

'When thou goest out to battle aga'nst thine ene^
mies, and seest horses, and chariots, and a people>
more than thou, be not afraid of them : for the Lord
thy God is with thee, which brought thee up out of
the land of Egypt. And it shall be, when ye are
come nigh unto battle, that the priest shall approach^
and speak unto the people, and shall say unto them^,
Hear, O Israel; ye approach this day unto battle
against your enemies: let not your hearts- faint; fear
not, and do not tremble, neither be ye terrified be-
cause of them; for the Lord your God is he that
goeth with you, to fight for you against your enemies,
to save you. And the officers shall speak unto the
people, saying, What man is there that hath built a
new house, and hath not dedicated it? let him go and

250 INSPIRATION OF THE BIBLE,

return to his house, lest he die in battle, and another
man dedicate it.'

'And what man is he that hath planted a vineyard,
and hath not yet eaten of it? let him also go and re-
turn unto his house, lest he die in the battle, and
another man eat of it.'

'And what man is there that hath betrothed a wife,
and hath not taken her? let him go and return unto
his house, lest he die in battle, and another man take
her.'

'And the officers shall speak further unto the peo-
ple, and they shall say, What man is there that is
fearful and faint-hearted? let him go and return unto
his house, lest his brethren's heart faint as well as his
heart. And it shall be, when the officers have made
an end of speaking unto the people, that they shall
make captains of the armies to lead the people.'

' When thou comest nigh unto a city to fight against
it. Then proclaim peace unto it.'

'And it shall be, if it make thee answer of peace,
and open unto thee, then it shall be, that all the peo-
ple that is found therein shall be tributaries unto
thee, and they shall serve thee' (Deut. xx. l-ll).

The sacred books of other nations we find full of
complexity and artifice, those of the Hebrews all sim-
plicity; others palling upon the taste after a few^ peru-
sals, these growing in beauty and interest with every
fresh examination, affording the highest gratification
and the richest nutriment to the most cultivated in-
tellect, and the sweetest enjoyment and improving
excitement to those who have had fewest advantages
for intellectual culture,

INSPIRATION OF THE BIBLE. 251

These books, so singularly distinguished above all
others in the ancient world for every thing that is
wise in precept, or benevolent and ennobling in sen-
timent, had their origin among a despised people,
who had been for ages degraded by the most abject
and cruel bondage, and had been under circumstances
the most unfavorable to intellectual and moral de-
velopment. Well did the oriental soothsayer exclaim
concerning them: 'According to this time it shall be
said of Jacob and of Israel, What hath God wrought!'
(Num. xxiii. 23).

III. INFLUENCE OF THE BIBLE.

The uniformly good influence of the bible, when it
is read and its precepts regarded, its power of deep
and thorough reformation on the human character,
its capacity to confer benefits on the human race
incomparably greater than any which have ever been
produced by any other means, deserve to be consid-
ered while we are on the subject of the divine
origin of the scriptures. It is agreeable to reason to
conclude that truth alone can be universally and
greatly beneficial; while falsehood and imposture, if
they confer any good at all, can do so only occasion-
ally and to a limited extent.

Consider, then, in the first place, what the human
race have always been without the bible. Civiliza-
tion, refinement, learning, without the bible, have
never made men virtuous, benevolent or happy. In
the proudest times of Greece and Rome, and among
the men most lauded for their exalted virtues, impu-
rities, cruelties and impieties, most destructive to

252 INSPIRATION OF THE BIBLE.

public happiness, not only existed, but were sanction-
ed by public sentiment, and were regarded as among
the proper enjoyments of civilized life. As instances,
we might refer to the unnatural lusts which prevail-
ed, the licentiousness of their religious worship, the
impurities of their domestic relations, the barba-
rous treatment of conquered nations, the cruelties of
their criminal jurisprudence and public spectacles,
particularly the gladiatorial shows, in which men
were made to murder each other by thousands for
the amusement of the beauty and fashion of Rome.
Such is man in his best condition without the bible,
just as the apostle Paul has described him. (Rom. i.
20-32).

Consider, in the second place, the marvellous in-
fluence which the bible has had — though very exten-
sively neglected and disbelieved where it is known,
and among the best but very imperfectly obeyed —
in correcting public sentiment, curbing licentiousness,
restraining cruelty, calling forth benevolence, and
making it the business of men to seek to benefit in-
stead of injuring each other. Universally, in exact
proportion as the influence of the bible predominates
over the influence of the natural propensities of men,
does virtue take the place of vice, benevolence that
of cruelty, and public happiness succeed to public
wretchedness.

Consider, in the third place, what a change would
be effected at once in the condition of the world, if
all the human race were to read, believe, and obey
the bible! All that is wrong would cease, all that is
right would be practised, perfect virtue and heartfelt
happiness would be universal. What a change! And

INSPIRATION OF THE BIBLE. 253

will any rational man think, that such a change can
be produced by falsehood and imposture? For let it
be remembered, that there is no other alternative: the
bible either is of divine authority, or it is a book of
falsehoods and imposition. Can any man, possessing
one spark of right moral feeling, look at the bible it-
self and at the influence it always produces when
believed and obeyed, and hesitate which side of the
above alternative to take ?

This sort of appeal is frequently made by Christ
and his apostles. Compare John vii. 15-24; viii. 47;
Lukexii. 57; Matt. vii. 28, 29; Luke xxiv. 32; Acts
ii. 14-17; 2 Cor. iii. 1-4; 1 Thess. ii. 13.

22

CHAPTER THIRTEENTH

MIRACLES.

I. SCRIPTURAL NAMES OF MIRACLES.

Miracles both in the Old Testament and the New
receive different appellations, according to the diffe-
rent points of view in which they are considered, or
the different influences they are adapted to produce.
They are sometimes called simply works (erga), which
is the most general name, and most frequently applied
to the miracles of Christ (Matt. xi. 2; John v. 36).
Considered in reference to the exertion of power ne-
cessary for performing them they are called powers
{dunameis), or, as in the English translation mighty
works (Mark vi. 2); considered in reference to their
adaptation to excite astonishment in those who be-
hold them., they are called wonders {terata^ tkaumasia)
or wonderful works (Matt. xxi. 15); and finally, when
regarded as proofs of divine authority, they are called
signs ox proofs {semeia^ tekmeria)^ as in Mark xvi. 20;
John xii. 37; Acts ii. 22; 2 Cor. xii. 12. These dif-
ferent appellations are brought together and all ap-
plied to the miracles of Christ in Acts ii. 22 and
Heb. ii. 4, compare also Acts xiv. 3.

MIRACLES. 255

The same distinctive names of miracles will be
found in the Old Testament, by comparing the fol-
lowing passages in the Hebrew original or the Greek
translation: Exod. viii. 19; Ps. Ixxviii. 11, 12; Exod.
iv. 9, 17; Dent. vi. 22; Ps. Ixxviii. 43. The same
distinction is to some extent observed, though not
uniformly, in the English bible.

II. IDEA. OF A MIRACLE.

A miracle is an effect produced, independently of
the usual natural causes, by the direct exertion of
supernatural power.

The whole history of the creation, as given in the
first two chapters of Genesis, represents God as pro-
ducing by creative power certain natural causes,
adapted to produce certain effects, which they uni-
formly do produce, under his direction and according
to his will. The connection between these created
natural causes and their appropriate effects is what is
meant by the phrase laws of nature. A miracle is
properly neither a counteraction nor suspension of
these laws, but is simply the production of an effect
which is either beyond the reach of any created
cause, or if within its reach, independently of its inter-
vention. For example, raising the dead to life would
be a miracle of the first kind; healing a disease, that is
curable, without the application of any natural ren>
edy, that is, without the intervention of any natural
cause that is in itself adapted to produce the effect,
would be a miracle of the second kind.

The idea that a miracle is a counteraction or sus-
pension of the laws of nature, in the strict and pro-

256 ^ MIRACLES.

per sense of these terms, has greatly embarrassed the
whole subject and laid it open to numerous philoso-
phical objections. Some of the old divines contend-
ed, that as a miracle was properly a counteraction
or suspension of the laws of nature, there must fol-
low every miracle another direct exertion of divine
power, in order to restore nature again to her usual
course. This they denominated the miracle of resti-
tution {miraculum restitutionis).

On the same ground, it has been contended that
miracles are unnatural and therefore incredible, con-
trary to experience and therefore incapable of being
proved by testimony. These objections and some
others will be considered as we procefed.

III. MIRACLES IN UNENLIGHTENED PERIODS.

Independently, however, of the erroneous idea of
miracles which has so extensively prevailed, one con-
sideration, with minds of a certain class, has had
great influence in counteracting their authority as
evidence in revealed religion. It is this: in unenlight-
ened and credulous ages, miracles always abound, but
in proportion as men become enlightened they grad-
ually decrease, and finally cease entirely. In reply to
this objection to the authority of miracles, I submit
the following remarks :

Whether the statement in the objection be true or
false, it cannot apply to the christian miracles; for
the age in which they were wrought was neither
unenlightened nor credulous, but on the contrary, it
was a period of great intellectual refinement and
almost universal skepticism. Even among the Jews,

MIRACLES. 257

there was the sect of the Sadducees, including most
of the wealth and political power of the nation; and
the Sadducees affirmed that 'there is no resurrection,
neither angel nor spirit' (Acts xxiii. 8). The philo-
sophy of Greece and Rome at this period was almost
universally an atheistical rather than a credulous phi-
losophy. The age of credulity and degradation of
intellect followed this, when obstinate resistance to
the light of heaven plunged men into the darkness of
the abyss. This is the decree of heaven from which
there is no escape: a determined rejection of the
consolations of true religion when oftered, always in-
volves men, to a greater or less extent, in the terrors
of superstition.

Again, from the nature of the case, miracles cannot
be constant. They can occur but seldom and only
at stated periods. Otherw^ise they would cease to
appear miraculous and be regarded as in the usual
course of nature. All our knowledge of the powers
of nature is derived from observation and experience;
and that which is uniformly observed or experienced
is regarded as natural for no other reason than the
uniformity of its occurrence. What makes the rising
of the sun in the morning after its disappearance for
the night, or the resuscitation of plants in the spring
after their death during the winter, appear natural;
while the healing of the sick by a touch, or the raising
of the dead by a word, appears miraculous? Simply
and only because the one is matter of uniform obser-
vation and the other not. Let the healing of the
sick and the raising of the dead become the uniform
events, and the rising of the sun and the resuscita-
22*

258 MIRACLES.

tions of spring the rare ones; and the miraculous and
the natural would appear to change places. It is
not sufficient to say, that there are ascertained natu-
ral causes for the one class of events and not for the
other; for we always infer a natural cause where we
observe a uniform effect, and the uniformity of the
effect is the only means by which we ever ascertain
the naturalness of the cause. What is gravitation,
for example, but a name given to an unknown cause,
inferred to be natural from the uniformity of its
effects?

There is one very sufficient reason why miracles
should always be supposed abundant in unenlighten-
ed ages, and become less frequent as human knowl-
edge becomes more extensive. It is this: an igno-
rance of natura:l causes often makes certain events
appear to be miraculous which are not so.

1. That may appear to be miraculous to a man
which takes place under circumstances that are un-
known to him.

The Syrian w^arrior, diseased by leprosy, at the
command of the prophet, bathed himself in the Jor-
dan and w^as cured. (2 Kings v). This was a real
miracle, because the w^aters of the Jordan had no
natural efficacy to cure leprosy, and the effect was
produced by the direct intervention of supernatural
power. But had he been cured by bathing in a medi-
cinal spring, the waters of which contained the natu*
ral remedies for this disease, if he were entirely igno-
rant of the medicinal properties of the water, and if
the fact that any waters possessed medicinal proper-

MIRACLES. 259

ties, were entirely unknown to him, the cure would
have appeared no less miraculous.

In such cases, the difference between the natural
and the miraculous can be ascertained only by con-
tinuous observation. Where the effect is the result
of the operation of natural causes, it will uniformly
take place under the same circumstances; but if the
cause be supernatural, the same preceding natural
circumstances will not be uniformly followed by the
same result. Should it be said, that the difference
can be shown by analyzing the medicinal waters of
the spring and demonstrating that they contain the
natural remedies for leprosy; I reply that our whole
knowledge of the natural adaptation of these reme-
dies to effect the cure, is derived from our observation
of the fact that they generally have been the means
of curing when properly administered; and should
the bathing of a leper in the Jordan be uniformly
followed by the cure of his leprosy, every scientific
man would infer with the utmost confidence the ac-
tual existence of a natural cause, even though no
analysis of its waters should enable him to discover
what it was.

2. That may appear miraculous to a man which
takes place under circumstances contrary to what he
has ever before witnessed.

A chemist can make ice in a hot day by the appli-
cation of natural causes; and God might enable an
accredited messenger of his to produce the same
effect in a miraculous manner, by the direct exertion
of divine power. But to the simple savage, entirely

260 MIRACLES.

ignorant of the laws of chemistry, both events might
seem to be equally miraculous.

In such cases, how can the difference be ascertain-
ed? By a careful observation and comparison of cir-
cumstances. In the chemical process, certain pre-
paratory steps and antecedent combinations may be
observed to be uniformly essential to the result; but
in the miracle it is not so, the same effect may fol-
low, whatever may have been the antecedent circum-
stances.

So to the unlettered savage the ascension of Christ
through the clouds to heaven, and the rising of a man
in a balloon, might at first view appear equally mirac-
ulous; but should he narrowly observe that the man
cannot rise without the balloon and that the balloon
must always be inflated in a particular way, while in
the other case the ascent was dependent on no such
antecedent circumstances, he would easily conclude
that the former must be the result of the operation of
natural causes, and the latter only of supernatural.

3. That may appear miraculous to a man which he
has never known to take place before.

The prophet Elisha miraculously caused iron to
swim like wood upon the surface of water (2 Kings
vi.), and the chemist by means of a compound blow-
pipe can cause iron naturally to burn with a flame
like dry wood; and to the ignorant man both events
might appear to be equally miraculous, and it is only
a careful observation of the necessary antecedents,
in regard to the events not miraculous, that will ena-
ble him to distinguish betweea the miraculous and
the natural.

MIRACLES. 261

In proportion as our knowledge of nature is ex-
tended, our power to produce such effects is increas-
ed; and in the same proportion, do natural events
which are merely wonderful, cease to be regarded as
miraculous.

But the civilized man can impose upon the igno-
rance of the savage and make him believe that to be
miraculous, which is produced by the application of
natural causes. Thus Columbus by foretelling an
eclipse, Belzoni by the exhibition of a telescope, and
• others by the explosion of gunpowder, or the reflec-
tions of a mirror, have acquired among savages the
reputation of possessing supernatural powers; be-
cause the natural causes of the results witnessed
were entirely unknown to those who witnessed them.

In the same way the scientific man may impose
upon the ignorance of the uneducated class in civil-
ized communties; for example, by exhibiting the
phenomena of electricity or showing the effect of
galvanism upon a dead body. But when a knowledge
of the properties of electricity or galvanism becomes
common, no such deception can be practised; and
when communities become thoroughly enlightened,
they infer natural causes for remarkable effects, even
in cases where all attempts to ascertain what they
are, utterly fail. In illustration, we may refer to the
exploits of Mons. Chaubert, the celebrated ^re-^iw^,
which have attracted so much attention in England
and this country. No enlightened man thinks of
regarding them as miracles, because the whole pur-
pose and effect of them is so entirely unworthy of
supernatural intervention; but the natural means by

262 MIRACLES.

which he is able to accomplish his wonders, still re-
main undetected.

In like manner, beings of an order superior to man,
by taking advantage of their superior knowledge of
nature, may impose upon the ignorance of man; and
hence the kingdom of darkness may have its pretend-
ed miracles as well as the kingdom of light its real
ones. This is expressly recognized in the bible, and
men are earnestly cautioned against the workers of
such miracles, which are characterized as lying won-
ders^ or miracles of falsehood, (2 Thess. ii. 9, 10, com-
pare Deut. xiii. 1-3; Matt. xii. 27; xxiv. 24; Rev.
xiii. 13-15).

All these effects are produced mediately^ that is, by
ascertaining and directing the existing powers of na-
ture; and not by the direct exertion of any power
which is superior to nature; and, therefore, they are
not in any proper sense miraculous.

It was in this way that the pretended miracles of
the Egyptian martumich or magicians were perform-
ed; for they worked by their enchantments^ and when
an effect was produced which they could not imitate,
and which was evidently beyond the reach of all the
powers of nature known to them, they exclaimed in
•dismay 'this is the finger of God' (Exod. viii. 18, 19).

Such are the causes of the abundance of miracles
in ignorant and credulous ages; and such is the rea-
son why they gradually decrease as men become
more extensively acquainted with nature.

But does this amount to evidence, or even to a pre-
sumption against the fact of the actual occurrence ol
real miracles? No more than pretended prophecy is

MIRACLES. 263

evidence against real prophecy, or pretended inspi-
ration is evidence against real inspiration, or than
any counterfeit is evidence against the existence of a
thing to be counterfeited. The false presupposes
the true as the essential condition of its own exis-
tence. (Compare p. 169, 201-203).

IV. MIRACLES NOT CONTRARY TO NATURE.

It has sometimes been said that miracles are con-
trary to nature or unnatural, and therefore incredible.

In reference to such an objection we may well ask
with Augustine (de Civ. Dei, xxi. 8) Quomodo est
contra naturam, quod est voluntate Dei, quum voluntas
tanti utique creatoris conditce rei cujusHbet natura sit?
' How is that contrary to nature, which is in accord-
ance with the will of God; since the nature of each
created thing must certainly be as the will of the
great creator?

What is nature but God acting in the creation?
And what are the laws of nature but the uniformity
of the divine operations? And what is natural but
that which the continued action of God makes natu-
ral? The Creator might have so ordered it, that the
grape should grow upon a tree and the apple upon a
vine; and had he so ordered it from the beginning,
would not this have been natural? He might have
made the earth revolve in a direction contrary to
that in which it now moves, and then the sun would
have seemed to rise where it now seems to set, and
to set where it now seems to rise; and had he done
so, would not this have been natural?

264 MIRACLES.

We deceive ourselves if we speak of nature or the
powers of nature as of integral causes existing inde-
pendently of the will of God. Indeed, laying reve-
lation aside, is there any possible mode of proving,
that any, even the most common operations of na-
ture, are performed mediately^ through the interven-
tion of created causes, and not immediately^ by the
direct exertion of divine power? How much more
do we know of the natural causes which produce
natural effects^ after we have given them a name,
than we did before? How much more do we know
of the real cause of the sensation of heat, after we
have said that it is caloric^ or of the real cause of the
tendency of all bodies towards the centre of the sys-
tem, after we have said that it is the attraction of
gravitation^ than we did before? Does the uttering
of these sounds convey any new knowledge to the
mind? or are they confessedly but the names which
we, for convenience sake,, give to some unknown
cause, whose actual effects we may investigate, but
of whose real essence we can have no knowledge?
And what means have we of proving, independently
of the scriptural account of the creation, that these
unknown causes are any thing more than the contin-
uous and direct action of the author of nature? Says
the German philosopher, Kant, 'No one can be so
inflated with a sense of his own discernment, as to
undertake to decide, whether that wonderful preser-
vation of the various species in the vegetable and
animal kingdoms, in which every new plant or ani-
mal generated, possesses the entire perfection of
structure of its original; and in the vegetable king-

MIRACLES. 265

dom all the delicate beauties of color; so that each
species of plants, at the return of every spring, is
reinstated in all its unabated excellence, its seeds
being protected from the destructive influence of dis-
organizing nature, during the severe weather of fall
and winter; — no one, I say, can determine, whether
this is produced by the mere influence of natural
causes, or whether it does not rather in every instance
require the immediate influence of the Creator.'
(Kant's Theory of Religion, Religionslehre, p. 158).

Speaking, as Kant here is, of what we can ascer-
tain by the light of nature only, he is perfectly cor-
rect; and it is only when we turn to the page of rev-
elation, that we find proof that God at first created
causes which were from the beginning intended to
produce permanent effects, both in the vegetable and
animal kingdom.

* And God said, Let the earth bring forth tender
grass, the herb yielding seed after his kind, the fruit-
tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself
upon the earth; and it was so.'

'And God created great whales, and every living
creature thatmoveth, which the waters brought forth
abundantly after their kind, and every winged fowl
after his kind; and God saw that it was good. And
God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful and multiphf,
and fill the waters in the seas; and let fowl multiply
in the earth' (Gen. i. 11, 21, 22).

Revelation, then, which the infidel rejects, is the
only source of proof that those powers of nature,
which he endeavors to put in the place oi God, have
themselves any real existence.

23

^66 MIRACLES.

Admitting, then, as we freely do, that the common
opeiMtions of nature are performed mediately and not
immediately^ and that we speak of what really exists
when we speak of the powers of nature; these pow-
ers certainly are neither self-existent nor indepen-
dent, but derive their existence and efficiency entirely
from the will of the Creator, who can at any time
change them if he chooses, or produce the same ef-
fects independently of them, if this best accord with
his purposes. It requires just the same exertion of
divine power to make the solar system move in its
present direction, that it would to make it move in
a contrary direction, or to stop its motions altogether;
and no more. So far as God is concerned, each of
these exertions of power is equally easy, and if he
so determine, equally natural. He who could create
one human pair, and place in them a natural cause
for the reproduction of their own species, could also
with equal ease, and naturally^ create other human
beings without the generative process. In this there
is nothing unnatural, or contrary to nature, or incred-
ible. No law of nature is suspended, or counteract-
ed, or set aside. The Creator simply re-exerts his
creative power; and with the Creator the exertion of
creative power is not unnatural.

All real miracles imply creative energy, and in the
bible they are always referred directly to creative
power; and in this view of them they are neither
contrary to nature nor incredible.

Nor do miracles imply any imperfection in God's
original plan. They are not an afier-thought brought
in to compensate for an unforeseen deficiency. He

MIRACLES.

267

who saw the end from the beginning, contemplated
them as a part of his original plan, and determined upon
them as the most direct and effectual means of au-
thenticating the revelation which he had decreed to
give to his fallen creatures on earth.

V. MIRACLES NOT CONTRARY TO EXPERIENCIT.

It has sometimes been urged that miracles are con-
trary to experience and therefore incapable of being
proved by testimony; in other words, ' it is contrary
to experience that a miracle should be true, but not
contrary to experience that testimony should be

false.'

Properly speaking, that only is contrary to our ex-
perience which we know from personal experience to
be false; and nothing which is said to have taken
place out of the sphere of our experience can be con-
trary to It. The phrase then, as used in the objec-
tion, can mean nothing more than that we ourselves
have never witnessed any thing like a miracle; and
the principle on which the objection proceeds, is, that
no testimony can establish the truth of an alleged
occurrence which is entirely different from any thing
which we ourselves have ever witnessed. This prin-
ciple contradicts the common sense of all mankind.
Every man that lives gives credit, on competent tes-
timony, to hundreds of facts which are entirely be-
yond the sphere of his experience, and in the loose
language of the objection contrary to it; and if men
did not instinctively thus give credit to testimony,
all advancement in knowledge would be forever pre-
cluded. Is a man never to believe any of the aston-

268 MIRACLES.

ishing facts recorded in the books of science till he
has seen them occur? Is not the testimony of scien-
tific men, of known probity and intelligence, suffi-
cient to establish the belief of the facts, so contrary
to our experience^ that the earth is globular and con-
tinually whirling through space with inconceivable
velocity, that metals can be made to burn with a
brilliant flame and each with a strong color different
from that of the metal itself, and that the muscles of
a dead body can be made to contract and move the
limbs with the energy of life? Is no testimony suffi-
cient to convince the inhabitants of the tropics, that
water in colder regions ever assumes the forms of snow
and ice? The common sense of every man answers
these questions in the affirmative; and enlightened
men and men of common sense in all ages and coun-
tries are in the habit of giving this credit to testimo-
ny; and it is universally a m.ark of obstinate and
stupid ignorance to withhold belief where the testi-
mony is unobjectionable.

Now the same degree of evidence that is sufficient
to establish in our minds the belief of such facts as
are alluded to above, is also sufficient to establish the
belief of facts that are really miraculous; for the ex-
perience to he overcome is precisely the same in both
cases.

But the laws of nature, it is said, have always been
uniform; and it is the supposition of an infringement
of these laws that constitutes the incredibility of
miracles. But how do we know that the laws of na-
ture have always been uniform, except by the testi-
mony of past ages? And if testimony be sufficient

MIRACLES. gSD"

to establish the fact of a general uniformity, it may
also be sufficient to establish the fact of occasional
infringement. As matter of fact, also, the testimony
of the past is not to unbroken uniformity, but it is
universal in favor of occasional miraculous interposi-
tion. We have then precisely the same ground for
believing in the actual occurrence of miracles, that
we have for believing in the general uniformity of the
operation of the laws of nature; and to say that
m,iracles are contrary to experience and therefore in-
capable of being proved by testimony, is simply to
talk nonsense. (Compare Paley's Evidences, Intro-
duction).

VI. USE OF MIRACLES IN A SYSTEM OF RELIGION.

A positive religion requires for its establishment
positive evidence that it is from God. This positive
evidence can be exhibited to the senses of men only
by such a control of nature as none but God the Cre-
ator can give. Men in all ages have demanded this
evidence, all false religions have pretended to give it,
while no religion but that of the bible has ever exhib-
ited the unequivocal testimony of real miracles.

Miracles, however, though a necessary constituent
part of the evidence of revealed religion, are by no
means the whole of it. They are addressed rather to
the physical nature of man; while the truths, the
sentiments, the emotions of the gospel, address them-^
selves directly to his spiritual nature; and where
there is no subjective aversion to religious truth, this
is evidence by far the most inward and satisfactory.
A heart that to any extent sympathizes with its God,.
23*

270 MIRACLES.

recognizes at once the truth of God, even though un-
accompanied with the testimony of sensible miracles,
•He that is of God (says Christ to the unbelieving
Jews) heareth God's words; ye therefore hear them
not, because ye are not of God' (John viii. 47). 'To
this end w-as I born, and for this cause came I into
the world, that I should bear witness to the truth.
Every one that is of the truth, heareth my voice'
(John xviii. 37). The apostle Paul, speaking of the
miraculous gift of tongues, says, they ' are for a sign,
not to them that believe, but to them that believe not;
but prophesying (that is, an exposition of the truths
and sentiments of the gospel) serveth not for them
that belie veth not, but for them which believe' (1
Cor. xiv. 22).

According to the scriptural view, the internal evi-
dence is clearly of a much higher character than the
external, and is adapted to those w^ho are in a higher
condition of spiritual advancement; and they who
make the truth of Christianity rest exclusively or
principally on the evidence of miracles, secularize it
and deprive it of half its heavenliness.

Nothing but the depravity of man and his estrange-
ment from God makes miracles necessary for the es-
tablishment of a true religion; and this depravity
may be and has been so obstinate as successfully to
resist the evidence of the most unequivocal and stu-
pendous displays of divine power. ' What sign sho w-
est thou' (said the unbelieving Jews to Christ directly
after they had witnessed one of his most benevolent
miracles) 'What sign showest thou, that we may see
and believe? What dost thou work? Our fathers did

MIRACLES, 27 1

eat manna in the desert; as it is written, He gave
them bread from heaven to eat' (John vi. 30, 31).
Jesus in his reply no more refers them to miracles,
but to the spiritual blessings which he was able to
confer on all who would apply to him (see verses
32-62). Often he severely reproved them for their
incessant and unreasonable demands for miraculous
testimony, a censure in which the apostle Paul fully
concurs. (Matt. xii. 38, 39; xvi. 1-4; Mark viii. 11,
12; compare 1 Cor. i. 22).

It should also be particularly noticed, that Jesus
and the apostles very generally refused to perform
miracles, unless there was some degree oi faith on the
part of those in whose behalf they were to be per-
formed; for without /fif^/i the miracle would produce
no spiritual benefit. The i^rm faith (pistis), as used
in this connection, certainly does not mean mere be-
lief, an intellectual assent to certain propositions, but
rather a state of feeling not obstinately hostile to re-
ligious truth, or a subjective condition favorable to
religious impression, an incipient sympathy with that
which is spiritual, a leaning towards God, a throbbing
of heart after a Savior. Compare the following pas-
sages: Matt. xiii. 58; Mark vi. 5, 6; Luke xxiii. 8-11;
Matt. viii. 10-13; ix. 2, 22, 29; xv. 28; Mark ii. 5;
v. 34; Luke vii. 9; viii. 48; xvii. 19: Acts xiv. 9; iii.
16, and numerous other places. See also Bretschnei-
der's N. T. Lexicon, vol. ii. p. 285; and WahPs Clavis
Nov. Test. vol. ii. p. 322; and compare Luke xviii.
8; Acts XX. 21; Rom. i. 12; 2 Cor. x. 15; Col. i. 4;
ii. 5; Gal. iii. 26; 1 Thess. i. 8; Eph. i. 15; vi. 23;
Phill. i. 25; ii. 17; 2 Tim. iii. 15; Philemon verse 5,
and the parallel passages.

272 MIRACLES.

It is in reference to this principle that Pascal ex-
presses the following sentiment: 'God has determin-
ed that divine things shall enter through the heart
into the mind, and not through the mind into the
heart.' — 'Hence it is that, in speaking of human
things, men say, it is necessary to know them before
we can love them; but on the contrary, in speaking
of divine things, the pious say, it is necessary to love
them in order to know them, and you can enter into
truth only through charity.' (Pascal's Thoughts,
Part i. art. 3, in French. The expressions are con-
siderably abridged from the original, but the sense
retained).

It was in view of the same principle that the pious
Anselm declared, 'I do not seek to understand in
order that I may believe, but I believe in order that
I may understand: for he who has not believed, will
not experience; and he who has not experienced,
will not understand.'

Miracles, however, such as those recorded in the
bible, are amply sufficient to leave the most harden-
ed sinner entirely inexcusable, and to evince the ob-
stinacy and depth of that depravity which can resist
the overwhelming amount of evidence both internal
and external, by whichthe divine mission of Christ and
the apostles is authenticated. Our Savior declares
respecting those that disbelieved, 'If I had not done
among them the works which none other man did,
they had not had sin; but now have they both seen

AND HATED BOTH ME AND MY FATHEr' (John XV. 24).

'If I had not come and spoken to them they had not
had sin; but now they have no cloak for their sins'

MIRACLES. 273

(verse 22). In the passage first quoted, the miracles
of Christ are undoubtedly particularly appealed to,
but the whole conduct of his benevolent life is also
included; and in the second passage the same weight
as evidence is given to the teachings as in the other
to the miracles,

VII. TRUE MIRACLES CAN BE DISTINGUISHED FROM FALSE.

It is admitted that men are liable to deception in
reference to miracles, as they are in reference to every
thing else. Even here God does not relieve us from
the responsibility of careful examination, of thinking
and judging for ourselves; but he pursues with us the
same disciplinary course which is seen in all his other
arrangements, both of the moral and physical world.
(Compare p. 24, 25). It is sufficient that there is no
necessity for deception, and that a proper use of the
faculties which God has given us, will always enable
us to distinguish true from false miracles.

Admitting that God has established a real and per-
manent connection between physical causes and their
effects, we may be sure that no efiect can be produc-
ed out of this connection except by the direct interfer-
ence of God. All such effects are really miraculous;
and if in any case we are certain that all the usual
natural causes are excluded, we may be certain that
a miracle has been wrought. We might be thus cer-
tain, were we to see leprosy or blindness publicly and
repeatedly cured by a touch or a word. In a case of
paralysis or nervous disease of any kind we might
not feel so confident; because in disorders of this

274 MIRACLES.

class, the mind has great influence over the physical
functions.

But a difficulty here sometimes occurs, which was
long ago suggested by St. Thomas Aquinas. 'That
may truly be called a miracle (says St. Thomas)
which is aside from the order of all created nature;
and in this sense God alone works miracles. But all
the powers of created nature are not known to us.
When, therefore, any thing is done aside from the
order of created nature known to us, by a created
power unknown to us, that is a miracle as to us,
though not a miracle in itself.' (Summa Theol. L. i.
qu. 110).

In order, however, to know that an event is really
miraculous, is it necessary that we should know
all the powers of created nature, or all the possible
combinations of circumstances under which all pos-
sible events can take place? Surely not. We cannot
argue against what we do know, from what we do not
know. In order to know that a particular road is
the shortest possible to a certain place, it is not ne-
cessary that we should know every other road that
leads to it. Should we see a hand, an eye, or an ear,
which had been entirely lost and obliterated, restored
in its original perfection to the maimed body; we
should know that such a restoration implies creative
power, and that creative power is natural to no one
but the Creator.

When the organs of the body begin to be decom-
posed and return to their original dust, we know then
that life is extinct; and we know also that no power
of created nature is adequate to the recalling of life

MIRACLES. 276

which has once actually departed. The resuscitat--
ing of the dead, then, under such circumstances, is
incontestible proof of creative power.

Unequivocal proof, therefore, that any one has
wrought such miracles, and that he has wrought
them in attestation of claims to divine authority, is
unequivocal proof of the validity of the claims; es-
pecially, as is the case with all the miracles of the
bible, when they are wrought for a purpose worthy
of the divine character, and when the whole conduct
and all the doctrines of those who perform them, cor-
respond to the best ideas which can be formed of the
benevolence and wisdom of God.

The total disparity between the miracles of the
bible and all pretended miracles, both as respects the
nature of the miracles themselves and the evidence
by which they are sustained, is exhibited with unan-
swerable clearness by Dr. Paley (Evidences, Prop. ii).

The genuineness of the historical books of the
New Testament, the credibility of the sacred histo-
rians, their competency to judge respecting the mi-
raculous facts which they narrate, their unimpeacha-
ble integrity, and the various circumstances which
confirm the truth of their statements beyond the pos-
sibility of reasonable doubt, have already been ex-
hibited (p. 102-114), and need not be repeated here.

It remains only that we state the conclusion at
which we have fairly arrived by impartial and tho-
rough investigation: The truth of the miraculous
narratives of the. bible is sustained by evidence which
no man can reasonably call in question; these mira-
cles were wrought in avowed attestation of claims

276 MIRACLES.

to divine authority; they were of such a nature that
they could not have been performed w^ithout the di-
rect exertion of divine power; and, therefore, they
fully substantiate the fact, that the sacred teach-
ers and the writers of the bible were commission-
ed and inspired by the Supreme God, the Creator
of the universe, the Author of nature and all her
laws.

END OP VOL. I.

BS511 .S89

Introduction to the criticism and

Princeton Theological Seminary-Speer Library

s'^wWMM 1

1012 00047 5931