Skip to main content

Full text of "Investigation of Communist propaganda in the United States. Hearing"

See other formats


■■iiii™^^^^^^^^ 


iii 


ill 


:!|! 


i 


ill 


llH 


>*i,tft«m<itttuif&»<iimri* 


'J 


HARVARD  COLLEGE 
LIBRARY 


GIFT  OF  THE 

GOVERNMENT 
OF  THE  UNITED  STATES 


INVESTIGATION  OF  COMMUNIST  PROPAGANDA  IN 

THE  UNITED  STATES— PART  6 

(NEW  YORK  CITY  AREA) 


HEARINGS 


BEFORE  THE 


COMmiTEE  ON  UN-AMEEICAN  ACTIVITIES 
HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 


EIGHTY-FIFTH  CONGRESS 

FIRST  SESSION 


MARCH  14  AND  15,  1957 


Printed  for  the  use  of  the  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities 


INCLUDING  INDEX 


UNITED  STATES 

GOVERNMENT  PRINTING  OFFICE 

WASHINGTON  :   1957 

HARVARD  COLLEGE  LIBRARY 
DEPOSITED  BY  THE 

-r-^   ,^-r«Trc-    r>n^/CDM^«CNT 


COMMITTEE  ON  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES 
United  States  House  of  Representatives 
FRANCIS  E.  WALTER,  Pennsylvania,  Chairman 
MORGAN  M.  MOULDER,  Missouri  BERNARD  W.  KEARNEY,  New  York 

CLYDE  DOYLE,  California  DONALD  L.  JACKSON,  California 

JAMES  B.  FRAZIER,  Jr.,  Tennessee  GORDON  H.  SCHERER,  Ohio 

EDWIN  E.  WILLIS,  Louisiana  ROBERT  J.  McINTOSH,  Michigan 

Richard  Arexs,  Director 
II 


CONTENTS 


PART  5  Pagt. 

Synopsis vii 

March  12,  1957:  Testimony  of— 

Francis  B.  Laughlin 253 

Irving  Fishman 253 

Serge  But,eneff--.„ 272 

Afternoon  session: 

Jolin  Lautner 275^ 

March  13.  1957:  Testimony  of — 

John  Gates 291 

Joseph  Starobin 305^ 

Angus  Cameron 320 

Rose  Baron 329 

Margaret  Cowl  Krumbein 335 

Afternoon  session: 

James  S.  Allen  (Sol  Auerbach) 343 

Jessica  Smith  (Abt) 347 

Joseph  Felshin  (Joseph  Fields) 358 

Mihon  Howard  (^lilton  Halpern) 361 

John  Lautner  (resumed) 364 

Ordway  Southard 366 

PART  6 

March  14,  1957:   Testimony  of — ■ 

Theodore  Bayer 369 

Zoltan  Deak  (Morton  Grad) 373 

Catherine  Gj^armaty 388 

Alex  Rosner 397 

Afternoon  session: 

Louis  Dattler 403 

Arpad  Fodor  Nagv 406 

Clara  Reich ." 409 

Michael  Savides 412 

Charles  Solon 414 

Michael  Savides  (resumed) 415 

Charles  Solon  (resumed) 415 

Michael  Savides  (resumed) 415 

James  Lee  (Shew  Hong) 417 

Frank  Bonora 419 

James  Lee  (Shew  Hong)  (resumed) 420 

March  15,  1957:  Testimonv  of — 

Michael  Tkach..J 425 

Frank  Ilchuk 435 

Anthony  Bimba 438 

Rov  Mizara 441 

David  Z.  Krinkin 448 

Sanmel  J.  Nikolauk 452 

John  Lautner  (resumed) 454 

Samuel  J.  Nikolauk  (resumed) 454 

Afternoon  session: 

Pa ul  Novick 455 

P>ank  Bonora 458 

Paul  Novick  (resumed) 459 

Irving  Freed 465 

Gerhard  Hagelberg 467 

Index i 

in 


Public  Law  601,  79th  Congress 

The  legislation  under  which  the  House  Committee  on  Un-American 
Activities  operates  is  Public  Law  601,  79th  Congress  [1946],  chapter 
753,  2d  session,  which  provides 

Be  it  enacted  ty  the  Senate  and  House  of  Representatives  of  the  United  States 
of  America  in  Congress  assembled,  *  *  * 

PART  2— RULES  OF  THE  HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 

Rule  X 

SEC.  121.    STANDING  COMMITTEES 
•  •«•*•• 

17.    Committee  on  Un-American  Activities,  to  consist  of  nine  Members. 

Rule  XI  >  <  -.       i 

POWEBS  AND  DUTIES  OP  COMMITTEES 


(q)  (1)  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities. 

(A)  Un-American  activities. 

(2)  The  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities,  as  a  wliole  or  by  subcommittee, 
is  authorized  to  make  from  time  to  time  investigations  of  (i)  the  extent,  char- 
acter, and  objects  of  un-American  propaganda  activities  in  tlie  United  States, 
(ii)  the  diffusion  within  the  United  States  of  subversive  and  un-American  propa- 
ganda that  is  instigated  from  foreign  countries  or  of  a  domestic  origin  and 
attaclis  the  principle  of  the  form  of  government  as  guaranteed  by  our  Constitu- 
tion, and  (iii)  all  other  questions  in  relation  thereto  that  would  aid  Congress  in 
any  necessary  remedial  legislation. 

The  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities  shall  report  to  the  House  (or  to  the 
Clerk  of  the  House  if  the  House  is  not  in  session)  the  results  of  any  such  investi- 
gation, together  with  such  recommendations  as  it  deems  advisable. 

For  the  purpose  of  any  such  investigation,  the  Committee  on  Un-American 
Activities,  or  any  subcommittee  thereof,  is  authorized  to  sit  and  act  at  such 
times  and  places  within  the  United  States,  whether  or  not  the  House  is  sitting, 
has  recessed,  or  has  adjourned,  to  hold  such  hearings,  to  require  the  attendance 
of  such  witnesses  and  the  production  of  such  books,  papers,  and  documents,  and 
to  take  such  testimony,  as  it  deems  necessary.  Subpenas  may  be  issued  under 
the  signature  of  the  chairman  of  the  committee  or  any  subcommittee,  or  by  any 
member  designated  by  any  such  chairman,  and  may  be  served  by  any  person 
designated  by  any  such  chairman  or  member. 

4e  :):  4:  4:  4:  ^  iH 

Rule  XII 

LEGISLATrV'E   OVERSIGHT   BY    STANDING   COMMITTEES 

Sec.  136.  To  assist  the  Congress  in  appraising  the  administration  of  the  laws 
and  in  developing  such  amendments  or  related  legislation  as  it  may  deem  neces- 
sary, each  standing  committee  of  the  Senate  and  the  House  of  Representatives 
shall  exercise  continuous  watchfulness  of  the  execution  by  the  administrative 
agencies  concerned  of  any  laws,  the  subject  matter  of  which  is  within  the  juris- 
diction of  such  committee ;  and,  for  that  purpose,  shall  study  all  pertinent  re- 
ports and  data  submitted  to  the  Congress  by  the  agencies  in  the  executive 
branch  of  the  Government. 


RULES  ADOPTED  BY  THE  85TH  CONGRESS 

House  Resolution  5,  January  3,  1957 

******* 

Rule  X 

STANDING   COMMITTEES 

1.  There  shall  be  elected  by  the  House,  at  the  commencement  of  each  Congress, 
******* 

(q)   Committee  on  Un-American  Activities,  to  consist  of  uin©  Members. 
*  *  *  *  *  *  * 

Rule  XI 

POWERS   AND   DUTIES    OF   COMMITTEES 


17.  Committee  ou  Un-American  Activities. 

(a)  Un-American  activities. 

(b)  The  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities,  as  a  whole  or  by  subcommittee, 
is  authorized  to  make  from  time  to  time,  investigations  of  (1)  the  extent, 
character,  and  objects  of  un-American  propaganda  activities  in  the  United  States, 
(2)  the  diffusion  within  the  United  States  of  subversive  and  un-xVmerican  propa- 
ganda that  is  instigated  from  foreign  countries  or  of  a  domestic  origin  and 
attacks  the  principle  of  the  form  of  government  as  guaranteed  by  our  Constitu- 
tion, and  (3)  all  other  questions  in  relation  thereto  that  would  aid  Congress  in 
any  necessary  remedial  legislation. 

The  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities  shall  report  to  the  House  (or  to 
the  Clerk  of  the  House  if  the  House  is  not  in  session)  the  results  of  any  such 
investigation,  together  with  such  recommendations  as  it  deems  advisable. 

For  the  purpose  of  any  such  investigation,  the  Committee  on  Un-American 
Activities,  or  any  subcommittee  thereof,  is  authorized  to  sit  and  act  at  such 
times  and  places  within  the  United  States,  whether  or  not  the  House  is  sitting, 
has  recessed,  or  has  adjourned,  to  hold  such  hearings,  to  require  the  attendance 
of  such  witnesses  and  the  production  of  such  books,  papers,  and  documents,  and 
to  take  such  testimony,  as  it  deems  necessary.  SubiK'nas  may  be  issued  under  the 
signature  of  the  chairman  of  the  committee  or  any  subcommittee,  or  by  any 
member  designated  by  any  such  chairman,  and  may  be  served  by  any  person 
designated  by  any  such  chairman  or  member. 

sjL  *  *  if  *  4:  * 

26.  To  assist  the  House  in  appraising  the  administration  of  the  laws  and  in 
developing  such  amendments  or  related  legislation  as  it  may  deem  necessary, 
each  standing  committee  of  the  House  shall  exercise  continuous  watchfulness  of 
the  execution  by  the  administrative  agencies  concerned  of  any  laws,  the  subject 
matter  of  which  is  within  the  jurisdiction  of  such  committee,  and,  for  that 
purpose,  shall  study  all  pertinent  reports  and  data  submitted  to  the  House  by 
the  agencies  in  the  executive  branch  of  the  Government. 


INVESTIGATION  OF  COMMUNIST  PROPAGANDA  IN  THE 
UNITED  STATES— PART  6 

(New  York  City  Area) 


THURSDAY,   MARCH   14,    1957 

United  States  House  of  Represextatrt.s, 

Subcommittee  of  the 
Committee  ox  Ux-Americax  Acti^^ties, 

New  York,  N.  Y. 

public  hearixg 

The  subcommittee  of  the  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities  met, 
pursuant  to  recess,  in  room  518,  United  States  Courthouse,  Foley 
Square,  New  York,  X.  Y.,  at  10  a.  m.,  Hon.  Morgan  M.  Moulder  (chair- 
man of  the  subcommittee)  presiding. 

Committee  members  present:  Representatives  Morgan  M.  Moulder 
of  Missouri,  and  Gordon  H.  Scherer  of  Ohio. 

Staff  members  present:  Richard  Arens,  director,  "VY.  Jackson  Jones, 
and  Frank  Bonora,  investigators. 

Mr.  jSIoulder.  The  committee  will  be  in  order.  ]Mr.  Counsel,  call 
your  first  witness. 

Mr.  Arex'S.  Mr.  Hagelberg? 

(No  response) 

Mr.  Bajer  i     Please  come  forward. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  which  you 
are  about  to  give  this  committee  will  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth, 
and  nothing  but  the  truth,  so  help  you  God  ? 

Mr.  Bayer.  I  do. 

TESTIMONY  OF  THEODORE  BAYER,  ACCOMPANIED  BY  COUNSEL, 

JOSEPH  FORER 

Mr.  Arex's.  Kindly  identify  yourself  by  name,  residence,  and  occu- 
pation. 

JNIr.  Bater.  Theodore  Bayer,  200  West  15th  Street,  Manhattan. 

Mr.  Arex's.  And  your  occupation  ? 

Mr.  Bayer.  I  am  the  administrative  secretary  of  the  National  Coun- 
cil of  the  American-Soviet  Friendship. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Are  you  appearing  today  in  response  to  a  subpena 
which  was  served  upon  you  by  the  House  Committee  on  Un-American 
Activities  ? 

Mr.  Bayer.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arex^s.  And  you  are  represented  by  counsel? 

369 


370  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

Ml*.  Bayer.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Counsel,  kindly  identify  yourself. 

Mr.  FoRER.  Joseph  Forer  of  Washington,  D.  C. 

Mr.  Arens.  Hoav  long  have  you  been  administrative  secretary  of  the 
Council  on  American-Soviet  Friendship  ? 

Mr.  Bayer.  This  would  be  about  the  11th  year  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  been  connected  with  the  publication  known 
as  Russky  Golos? 

Mr.  Bayer.  I  am  not  connected  with  Russk}^  Golos. 

Mr.  Arens.  Plave  }ou  ever  been  connected  wnth  Russky  Golos? 

Mr.  Bayer.  I  have  not  been  connected  with  the  Russky  Golos  for  at 
least  7  years. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  was  your  position  when  you  were  connected  with 
Russky  Golos  ? 

Mr.  Bayer.  As  I  said,  I  am  not  connected  with  the  Russky  Golos, 
and  I  would  prefer  not  to  discuss  the  Russlv}^  Golos  since  I  have  no 
connection  with  it. 

Mr.  Arens.  Please  tell  us  what  was  your  comiection  7  years  ago  with 
Russky  Golos. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Bayer.  I  will  refuse  to  answer  this  question  on  the  basis  of  my 
rights  under  the  first  amendment  and  my  privilege  under  the  fifth 
amendment  not  to  testify  against  myself. 

Mr.  Arens.  We  would  like  to  display  to  you  now,  if  you  please,  Mr. 
Bayer,  a  photostatic  reproduction  of  a  document  filed  with  the  clerk  of 
the  supreme  court  of  New  York  County,  to  decrease  the  number  of 
directors  of  the  Russky  Golos  Publishing  Corp.,  in  which  your  name 
appears  as  president  of  the  Russky  Golos  Publishing  Corp. 

Kindly  look  at  that  document  and  tell  us  whether  or  not  you  are 
accurately  described  there  as  president  of  the  Russky  Golos  Publish- 
ing Corp. 

(Document  marked  "Bayer  Exhibit  N"o.  1,"  and  retained  in  commit- 
tees files. ) 

Mr.  Bayer.  I  refuse  to  answer  this  question  for  the  reasons  stated. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  honestly  feel,  Mr.  Bayer,  that  if  you  told  this 
committee  truthfully  whether  or  not  you  have  been  president  of  the 
Russky  Golos  Publishing  Corp.  you  would  be  supplying  information 
which  might  be  used  against  you  in  a  criminal  proceeding  ? 

Mr.  Bayer.  It  might. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  were  you  born  ? 

Mr.  Bayer.  Russia. 

Mr.  Arens.  Wlien  did  you  come  to  the  United  States  for  permanent 
residence  ? 

Mr.  Bayer.  In  1912. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  a  citizen  of  the  United  States  ? 

Mr.  Bayer.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  a  citizen  by  naturalization  or  derivation  ? 

Mr.  Bayer.  Naturalization. 

Mr.  Arens.  "Wlien  were  you  naturalized  and  where  ? 

Mr.  Bayer.  In  1919  at  the  District  Court  of  Newark,  N.  J.,  Essex 
Comity. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  at  the  time 
of  your  naturalization  ? 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  371 

Mr.  Bayer.  I  "will  refuse  to  answer  this  question  for  the  reasons 
given. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  presently  a  Communist  ? 

Mr.  Bater.  I  will  refuse  to  answer  for  the  same  reason. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  a  person  by  the  name  of  John  Lautner? 

Mr.  Bater.  I  will  refuse  to  answer  that  question. 

Mr.  Arens.  Two  days  ago  before  this  committee,  Jolm  Lautner  took 
an  oath  and  identified  you  as  a  person  known  by  him  to  have  been  a 
member  of  the  Communist  Partv.  Was  he  lying  or  was  he  telling 
the  truth? 

Mr.  Bater.  I  will  refuse  to  answer  this. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  has  been  your  connection,  if  any,  with  Soviet 
Russia  Today? 

Mr.  Bater.  I  have  not  had  any  connection  with  Soviet  Russia  To- 
day for  about  11  years. 

Mr.  Arens.  "Wliat  was  your  connection  when  you  did  have  a  connec- 
tion with  Soviet  Russia  Today? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Bater.  I  will  refuse  to  answer  this  on  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  Abens.  You  were  manager  of  Soviet  Russia  Today,  were  you 
not,  Mr.  Bayer  ? 

Mr.  Bater.  I  will  refuse  to  answer  that. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  will  display  to  you  now  a  photostatic  reproduction  of 
the  masthead  of  Soviet  Russia  Today  in  which  you  are  identified  as 
manager  of  Soviet  Russia  Today.  Kindly  look  at  this  document  and 
tell  us  whether  or  not  you  are  accurately  described  as  manager  of  Soviet 
Russia  Today. 

(Document  marked  "Bayer  Exhibit  No.  2,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Bater.  I  will  refuse  to  answer  this  on  the  grounds  given 
previously. 

Mr.  Arens.  Was  Soviet  Russia  Today  a  predecessor  publication  to 
New  World  Review  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Bater.  I  will  refuse  to  answer  this. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  honestly  feel  that  if  you  told  this  committee 
what  information  you  have  with  reference  to  the  successor  publication, 
New  World  Review,  you  would  be  supplying  information  which 
might  be  used  against  you  in  a  criminal  proceeding  ? 

Mr.  Bater.  Possibly. 

Mr.  Arens.  We  will  display  to  you,  if  you  please,  sir,  a  photostatic 
reproduction  of  2  pages  from  New  World  Review  of  March  1951  in 
whicli  your  name  appears,  Theodore  Bayer,  as  one  of  the  contributors. 
Kindly  look  at  that  document  and  tell  us  whether  or  not  you  are 
accurately  described. 

(Document  marked  "Bayer  Exhibit  No.  3,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Bater.  I  will  refuse  to  answer  this  on  the  grounds  stated  before. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  now,  or  have  you  ever  been,  connected  with  the 
Citizens  Emergenc}-  Defense  Conference? 

Mr.  Bater.  I  will  refuse  to  answer  that. 

Mr.  Arens.  We  will  display  to  you  now,  if  you  please,  a  photostatic 
reproduction  of  the  letterhead  of  the  Citizens  Emergency  Defense 


372  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

Conference  on  which  you  are  listed  as  one  of  the  officials  of  that  or- 
ganization. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Kindly  look  at  that  document  and  tell  us  whether  or 
not  you  are  accurately  described  there. 

Mr.  Bayer.  I  will  refuse  to  answer  this  quastjon  on  the  grounds 
given  before. 

(Document  marked  "Bayer  Exhibit  No.  4,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Bayer,  as  the  chairman  announced  in  the  opening 
statement,  this  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities  is  developing 
factual  information  with  the  A^iew  of  such  amendments  to  the  law  as 
the  facts  might  warrant  with  reference  to  the  dissemination  within 
the  United  States  of  Communist  propaganda.  Do  you  have  infor- 
mation respecting  contributions  made  from  the  International  Workers 
Order  to  Eussk}^  Golos  ? 

Mr.  Bayer.  I  will  refuse  to  answer  this  on  the  grounds  given. 

]Mr.  Arens.  The  fact  is,  is  it  not,  that  w^hile  you  were  president  of 
Russky  Golos  several  thousand  dollars  were  contributed  from  the 
International  "Workers  Order,  a  Communist-controlled  organization, 
to  your  publication  Russky  Golos  ? 

Mr.  Bayi:r.  I  will  refuse  to  answer  this  question  on  the  ground 
given. 

Mr.  Arens.  How  long  have  you  occupied  your  present  position  ? 

Mr.  Bayer.  You  are  referring  to  the  National  Council  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Yes,  sir.  National  Council  of  American-Soviet 
Friendship. 

Mr.  Bayer.  Since  1946. 

Mr.  Arens.  "\^nio  is  your  immediate  superior  or  superiors  in  the 
organization  ? 

Mr.  Bayer.  Well,  I  don't  know  whether 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  an  employee  of  the  organization  are  you  not? 

Mr.  Bayer.  Yes. 

]\Ir.  Arens.  Who  employs  you  ? 

JNIr.  Bayer.  The  organization. 

]\Ir.  Arens.  Who  in  the  organization  emj^lo^^s  you  ? 

Mr.  Bayer.  There  is  an  officer  of  the  organization,  the  director  of 
the  organization. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  have  a  letterhead  of  the  National  Council  of  Amer- 
ican-Soviet Friendship,  Inc.,  on  which  appears  the  names  of  several 
officers  of  that  organization.  Kindly  look  at  that  letterhead  and 
tell  this  committee,  while  you  are  under  oath,  the  name  of  each 
person  listed  on  that  board  of  directors  or  who  holds  an  official  posi- 
tion with  the  National  Council  of  American-Soviet  Frienclship 
known  by  you  to  be  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party. 

Mr.  Bayer.  I  didn't  get  3'Our  question. 

Mr.  Arens.  Please  look  at  that  letterhead  and  tell  this  committee, 
while  you  are  under  oath,  the  name  of  each  person  whose  name  appears 
on  that  letterhead  known  bv  vou  to  be  a  member  of  the  Communist 
Party. 

Mr.  Bayer.  I  will  refuse  to  answer  the  question  as  stated. 

(Document  marked,  ''Bayer  Exhibit  No.  5,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 


COMMUKIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    "UNITED    STATES  373 

Mr.  Moulder.  Is  there  any  one  whose  name  appears  on  the  letter- 
head who  is  not  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  i 

Mr.  Bayer.  I  would  have  to  refuse  to  answer  that,  Mr.  Chairman, 
for  the  same  reasons  given  before. 

Mr.  Moulder.  It  would  not  incriminate  you,  would  it,  to  reveal  the 
name  of  some  person  who  was  known  to  you  not  to  be  a  member  of  the 
Communist  Party? 

Mr.  Bater.  I  will  refuse  to  answer  that  on  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  a  person  by  the  name  of  Zoltan  Deak, 
editor  of  the  Hungarian  Daily  ? 

Mr.  Bayer.  I  refuse  to  answ^er  that  on  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  a  person  by  the  name  of  Paul  Novick, 
editor  of  the  Morning  Freiheit  ? 

Mr.  Bayer.  I  will  refuse  to  answer  that  on  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  a  person  by  the  name  of  David  Krinkin, 
editor  of  Kussky  Golos  ? 

]Mr.  Bayer.  I  will  refuse  to  ansMer  this  question  on  the  same 
grounds. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know"  a  person  by  the  name  of  Michael  Tkach, 
editor  of  the  Ukrainian  Daily  News  ^ 

ISIr.  Bayer.  I  will  refuse  to  answer  this  question  on  the  grounds 
given. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  a  person  by  the  name  of  James  Lee,  editor 
of  the  China  Daily  News  ? 

Mr.  Bayer.  I  will  give  the  same  answer  concerning  individuals. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  a  person  by  the  name  of  Catherine  Gyar- 
maty,  editor  of  Nok  Vilaga  ? 

Mr.  Bayer.  I  refuse  to  answer  that. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  would  con- 
clude the  staff  interrogation  of  this  witness. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  names  that  you  have  read  there,  do  w^e  have  evi- 
dence of  their  communistic  activity  ^ 

Mr.  Arens.  All  but  one  on  tliis  record  in  tlie  last  2  days  have  been 
identified  as  persons  known  to  have  been  members  of  the  Connnunist 
Party. 

Mr.  Moulder.  All  of  the  documents  presented  by  counsel  to  the  wit- 
ness will  be  made  a  part  of  the  records  of  the  committee. 

The  witness  is  excused ;  and  you  may  claim  your  witness  fees  with 
the  clerk  of  the  committee. 

Mr.  Arens.  Zoltan  Deak,  please  come  forward. 

]\Ir.  Moulder.  Do  5^011  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  you  give 
this  committee  will  be  the  truth,  and  nothing  but  the  truth,  so  help 
you  God? 

Mr.  Deak.  I  do. 

TESTIMONY  OF  ZOLTAN  DEAK  (MORTON  GEAD),  ACCOMPANIED  BY 
COUNSEL,  ABRAHAM  UNGER 

Mr.  Arens.  Kindly  identify  yourself  by  name,  residence  and  occu- 
pation. 

Mr.  Deak.  Zoltan  Deak,  660  Arnow  Avenue,  Bronx,  newspaper- 
man. 


374  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  appearing  today  in  response  to  a  subpena 
which  was  served  upon  you  by  the  House  Committee  on  Un-Ameri- 
can Activities? 

Mr.  Deak.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  you  are  represented  by  counsel  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  Yes. 

Mr.  Unger.  Abraham  linger,  320  Broadway,  New  York  City. 

Mr.  Scherer.  What  did  you  say  your  address  was  ? 

Mr.  Unger.  660  Arnow  Avenue. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Did  you  ever  live  at  2251  Loring  Place  in  New  York? 

Mr.  Deak.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Do  you  know  the  Zoltan  Deak  who  does  live  at  2251 
Loring  Place? 

Mr.  Deak.  Just  by  hearsay. 

Mr,  Scherer.  To  your  knowledge  there  is  another  man  named 
Zoltan  Deak,  then,  in  the  city  of  New  York  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  To  my  Imowledge  there  is. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Do  you  know  what  his  business  or  profession  is  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  He  has  been  a  newspaperman,  as  far  as  I  know. 

Mr.  Arens.  "Wliere  and  when  were  you  born  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  I  was  born  in  Hungary  in  1904,  May  24. 

Mr.  Arens.  AVlien  did  you  come  to  the  United  States  for  perma- 
nent residence  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  I  arrived  here  on  December  1, 1923. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  a  citizen  of  the  United  States  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens,  By  what  device  are  you  a  citizen;  by  naturalization  or 
derivation  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  By  naturalization. 

Mr.  Arens.  "Wliere  and  when  were  you  naturalized  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  I  was  naturalized  in  the  District  Court  of  Northern  Illi- 
nois in  1930;  I  believe  in  February.    I  don't  know  the  exact  date. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  when  you 
were  naturalized  as  a  citizen  of  the  United  States? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Deak.  Mr.  Chairman,  permit  me  to  say  a  few  words  before  I 
answer  this  question.  There  are  bad  laws  on  the  lawbooks  of  our 
country  which  jeopardize  the  existence • 

Mr.  Scherer,  Pardon  me  just  a  minute,  I  didn't  hear  what  you 
said.     There  are  what  kind  of  laws  on  the  books? 

Mr.  Deak.  Bad.  Which  jeopardize  the  livelihood  of  people  and 
for  this  reason — and  the  liberty  of  the  people — I  decline  to  answer 
this  question  on  the  basis  of  the  first  and  fifth  amendments. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  a  man  by  the  name  of  John  Lautner? 

Mr.  Deak.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  same  basis. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Lautner,  2  days  ago  before  this  committee,  took  an 
oath  and  identified  you  while  he  was  under  oath  as  a  member  of  the 
Communist  Party.     Was  he  lying  or  telling  the  truth? 

Mr.  Deak.  I  decline  to  answer  this  on  the  same  basis. 

Mr.  Arens,  Wliat  is  the  firm  or  organization  in  which  you  are 
employed  ? 

Mr.  Deak,  Are  you  asking  a  firm  name  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  ^^^ere  do  you  work  ? 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  375 

Mr.  Deak.  Hungarian  Word,  Inc. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  is  that  located  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  130  East  16th  Street,  New  York  City. 

Mr.  Arens.  In  what  capacity  are  you  employed  there  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  As  an  editor. 

Mr.  Arens.  How  long  have  you  been  employed  as  an  editor  of  the 
Hungarian  Word  ?  That  is  the  English  translation  of  the  publication, 
is  it  not  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  I  don't  know  the  exact  date.  It  must  have  been  some- 
time in  1953  when  this  newspaper  was  established. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  is  the  circulation  of  the  Hungarian  Word? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.   Deak.  Approximately  3,500,  I  would  say. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  it  a  daily  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  No,  sir.     It  is  a  weekly. 

Mr.  Arens.  Who  publishes  the  Hungarian  Word  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  The  Hungarian  Word,  Inc. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  who  are  the  principal  officers  of  the  Hmigarian 
Word,  Inc.  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Deak.  I  wouldn't  be  able  to  list  them  correctly;  Arpad  Fodor 
Nagy  is  one  officer. 

Mr.  Arens.  Spell  his  name. 

Mr.  Deak.  A-r-p-a-d  F-o-d-o-r  N-a-g-y. 

Mr.  Arens.  Will  you  pause  there  a  moment,  please  ?  Could  you  tell 
this  committee  whether  or  not  to  your  certain  knowledge  he  is  a 
Communist  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  I  decline  to  answer  this  on  the  basis  of  the  fifth  amend- 
ment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Give  us  another  name  of  an  officer. 

Mr.  Deak.  Pardon  me? 

Mr.  Arens.  Give  us  another  name  of  an  officer  in  this  publishing 
firm. 

Mr.  Deak.  Louis  Dattler. 

Mr.  Arens.  Tell  us  whether  or  not  to  your  certain  knowledge  Louis 
Dattler  is  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party. 

Mr.  Deak.  I  decline  to  answer  this  on  the  basis  of  the  fifth  amend- 
ment and  first  amendment. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Mr.  Counsel,  has  Louis  Dattler  been  identified? 

Mr.  Arens.  Yes,  sir ;  and  so  has  the  gentleman  whose  name  I  gave 
preceding  Dattler. 

Proceed,  if  you  please,  sir. 

Mr.  Deak.  The  otlier  officers  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Yes. 

Mr.  Deak.  I  can't  recollect  any  other  officer  right  now. 

Mr.  Arens.  Was  there  a  predecessor  publication  to  the  Hungarian 
Word^  F  p  fe 

Mr.  Deak.  Yes,  sir;  there  was. 
Mr.  Arens.  VJlmt  was  the  name  of  it  ? 
Mr.  Deak.  That  was  the  Hungarian  Daily  Journal. 
Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  editor  of  the  Hungarian  Daily  Journal  ? 
Mr.  Deak.  Part  time. 

Mr.  Arens.  Wliat  was  your  status  with  tlie  Hungarian  Daily 
Journal ? 


376  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

Mr.  Deak.  Editor  at  a  certain  time  of  its  existence. 

]\Ir.  Arexs.  Did  the  Hungarian  Daily  Journal  receive  subsidies 
from  the  International  Workers  Order  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Deak.  I  have  not  been  in  its  business  office.  I  couldn't  possibly 
answer. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  the  Hungarian  Daily 
Journal  received  funds  from  the  International  Workers  Order  'i 

Mr.  Deak.  I  could  not  answer  that,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  Hugo  Gellert  identified  with  the  Hungarian  Word  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  G-e-1-l-e-r-t. 

Mr.  Deak.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  Tell  this  committee  whether  or  not  to  your  certain 
knowledge  Hugo  Gellert  is  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party. 

Mr.  Deak.  I  respectfully  decline  to  answer  it  on  the  basis  of  the 
first  and  fifth  amendments. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  Alex  Rosner  connected  with  the  Hungarian  Word? 

Mr.  Deak.  Yes,  sir ;  he  is. 

Mr.  Arens.  Tell  us  whether  or  not  to  your  certain  knowledge  Alex 
Rosner  is  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party. 

Mr.  Deak.  I  respectfullj-  decline  to  answer  this  on  the  basis  of  the 
first  and  fifth  amendments. 

Mr.  Arens.  ^Vliat  sources  of  funds  does  the  Hungarian  Word  have 
other  tlian  the  funds  derived  from  subscriptions  and  from  advertise- 
ments ? 

Mr.  Deak.  I  have  not  been  coimex'ted  with  the  business  administra- 
tion of  the  paper.    I  know  that  we  receive  donations  from  the  readers. 

Mr.  Arens.  Does  the  Hungarian  Word  leceive  funds  from  any  or- 
ganization which  is  a  ( -ommunist-controUed  organization? 

Mr.  Deak.  Not  to  my  knowledge. 

Mr.  Arens.  The  insurance  examiner's  report  during  the  proceedings 
by  the  State  of  New  York  against  the  International  Workers  Order 
disclosed  that  several  thousand  dollars  were  transferred  from  the 
International  Workers  Order,  a  Communist  organization,  to  the  Hun- 
garian Word.  Are  you  cognizant  of  that  fact  ?  I  mean  to  the  pred- 
ecessor organization,  the  Himgarian  Daily  Journal.  Are  you  cog- 
nizant of  that  fact  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  I  am  not. 

Mr.  Arens.  Does  your  publishing  firm,  in  addition  to  publishing  the 
Hungarian  Word,  also  publish  books,  pamphlets,  or  periodicals  of  any 
other  description  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  Pardon  me.    What  was  the  question  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Does  your  publishing  firm  also  publish  other  material 
besides  the  paper  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  From  time  to  time,  we  did  publish  pamphlets  and  also 
some  books. 

Mr.  Arens.  Give  us  a  characterization  of  the  pamphlets  and  of  the 
books,  if  you  please,  sir. 

Mr.  Deak.  There  is  one  collection  of  Hungarian  short  stories  that 
we  published  recently.    The  title  was  Magyar  Remekirok. 

Mr.  Scherer.  What  does  that  mean  in  English  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  It  means  the  writers  of  Hungarian  masterpieces,  I  would 
sav. 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  377 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you,  or  to  your  certain  knowledge  is  any  one, 
connected  with  your  firm 

]Mi\  Ungee.  He  is  not  finished  with  his  answer. 

Mr.  Deak.  I  did  not  finish  describing  the  book,  which  collected 
works  from  classic  Hungarian  short-story  writers  and  novelists.  Also 
we  jjublished — I  was  not  prepared  for  this  questioning — Springtime 
on  the  Danube,  the  work  of  two  French  journalists,  Janine  Boussin- 
nouse  and  her  husband,  Louis  Villofosse,  to  the  best  of  my  recollection. 
These  are  two  French  newspaper  people.  One  of  them  was  the  former 
admiral  of  the  free  French  Navy  who  visited  Hungary  in  1954,  and  we 
thought  this  book  would  be  of  interest  to  the  general  public.  We  pub- 
lished this  book  in  English  and  in  Hungarian  with  the  arrangement  of 
the  publishing  firm  in  Paris.  Some  pamphlets,  I  can't  recall  them. 
One  of  them  was  the  "Know  Your  Rights."  We  published  pamphlets. 

Mr.  Arens.  Does  your  firm  operate  a  bookstore  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  is  the  bookstore  and  what  is  its  name  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  It  is  on  the  same  premises. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  is  the  name  of  the  bookstore  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  Magyar  Konyvesbolt.  It  means  in  Hungarian  "book- 
shoi3." 

Mr.  Arexs.  Does  this  bookstore  or  does  your  firm 

Mr.  Dear.  Pardon  me.  It  is  not  a  store  as  such.  It  is  a  sort  of 
stockroom  from  which  we  fill  orders. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  your  firm,  or  is  any  individual  in  your  firm,  registered 
under  the  Foreign  Agents  Registration  Act  ^ 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel. ) 

Mr.  Deak.  No ;  not  that  I  know  of,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  Does  your  firm  import  from  abroad  fi-om  any  Iron 
Curtain  country  publications  or  periodicals  of  any  kind,  character, 
or  description  ( 

Mr.  Deak.  For  resale  ? 

]Mr.  Arens.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Deak.  While  I  am  not  directly  connected  with  the  business  end 
of  the  newspa})er,  to  my  knowledge  it  does  not.  The  business  itself 
publishes  from  sources  in  New  York  City. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  traveled  abroad  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  When  and  where  did  you  go  when  you  were  traveling 
abroad? 

Mr.  Deak.  The  last  and  only  time  I  traveled  abroad  was  in  1948. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  did  you  go  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  I  went  to  Hungary. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  precipitated  your  visit  to  Hungary  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  Hungary  went  through  the  Second  World  War  through 
the  course  of  which  it  was  almost  completely  destroyed.  Our  readers 
and  the  Hungarian  public  in  general  have  an  abiding  love  toward  their 
native  land  and  its  people. 

Mr.  SciiERER.  I  didn't  understand  you.     You  have  what  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  An  abiding  love  toward  their  native  land  and  its  people. 
There  has  been  widespread  demand  among  our  readers  to  have  their 
newspaper  furnish  firsthand  information  as  to  the  condition  of  the 
country  3  years  after  the  end  of  the  Second  AVorld  War.    In  pursuance 


378  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

of  that  thing  and  also  as  a  newspaperman  who  should,  if  possible, 
see  things  firsthand,  I  went  to  Hungary  in  1948. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  the  guest  of  any  group  or  organization  in 
Hungary  in  1948  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  No,  sir;  I  would  not  say  I  was  a  guest.  I  had  friends 
there,  and  relatives. 

Mr.  Arens.  How  does  your  publication  receive  its  information  re- 
specting events  in  Hungary  for  portrayal  to  its  readers  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  Primarily  we  rely  on  the  American  press,  especially  the 
New  York  Times. 

Mr.  Arens.  Does  your  publication 

Mr.  Deak.  Pardon  me,  sir.  I  want  to  continue.  The  New  York 
Times  I  read  regularly.  The  Wall  Street  Journal  I  read  also  regu- 
larly. I  am  getting  every  newspaper  and  have  been  getting  the 
Christian  Science  Monitor  for  a  while.  This  we  supplement  with 
newspapers  from  Hungary. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  You  said  you  rely  on  these  diiierent  newspapers. 
How  about  the  Daily  Worker?     Do  you  read  the  Daily  Worker? 

Mr.  Deak.  Yes;  we  read  that,  too. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  receive  newspapers  from  Hungary? 

Mr.  Deak.  Yes,  sir;  we  subscribe  to  newspapers  in  Hungary. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  in  the  portrayal  of  news  and  in  your  editorial 
policy  follow  a  line  laid  down  by  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  I  decline  to  answer  this  on  the  basis  of  the  first  and  fifth 
amendments. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  in  the  propagation  of  information  presently 
under  discipline  of  the  Communist  conspiracy? 

Mr.  Deak.  I  respectfully  decline  to  answer  this  on  the  basis  of  the 
first  and  fifth  amendments. 

Mr.  SciiERER.  Did  you  say  you  were  born  in  Hungary? 

Mr.  De.\k.  Yes. 

Mr.  SciiERER.  You  came  here  at  what  age  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  I  was  19  years  old. 

Mr.  Scherer.  And  you  are  a  naturalized  American,  then? 

Mr.  Deak.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  SciiERER.  Do  you  belong  to  any  Hungarian  societies  in  the 
United  States  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  wnth  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Deak.  I  belong  to  a  social  club  in  the  Bronx. 

Mr.  SciiERER.  Wliat  is  the  name  of  that  social  club  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  Hungarian  Social  Club,  to  my  best  knowledge,  is  the 
name  of  it. 

Mr.  SciiERER.  You  said  that  your  trip  in  1948  to  Hungary  was 
prompted  by  the  fact  that  your  readers  were  evidently  persons  of 
Hungarian  extraction,  and  have  an  abiding  love  for  their  native  land 
and  for  the  people  of  Hungaiy.     Did  you  not  say  that? 

Mr.  Deak.  I  must  have  said  words  to  that  effect. 

Mr.  SciiERER.  Since  the  Russian  atrocities  in  Hungary,  have  you 
Mn-itten  an3'thing  in  condemnation  of  the  action  of  the  Communists 
in  Hungary? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Deak.  Yes,  sir ;  I  did. 

Mr.  SciiERER.  Are  those  publications  available? 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  379 

Mr.  DiLiK.  I  am  sorry.  If  I  had  been  advised  in  time,  I  would 
have  brought  a  copy  to  substantiate  that  statement.  I  stated  in  one 
but  possibly  more  articles  that  I  consider  the  calling  in  of  the  Soviet 
troops  to  suppress  the  popular  demonstration  of  October  23  a  fatal 
and  tragic  error. 

Mr.  SciiERER.  On  the  part  of  the  Communists? 

Mr.  DIL^.K.  On  the  part  of  the  authorities  in  charge  of  that  particular 
step. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  I  didn't  understand  you.  You  mean  on  the  part 
of  the  authorities,  did  you  say  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  Yes. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  You  mean  the  Russians  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  No.  The  Russians  didn't  call  in  the  Russians.  It  was 
the  Hungarian  authorities  who  called  in,  under  the  Warsaw^  Pact,  the 
Soviet  troops  stationed  in  Hungary  at  that  time. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  You  know  it  was  the  Communists  in  Hungary  who 
invited  the  Russians  in ;  do  you  not  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  I  couldn't  answer  as  to  the  mechanism  and  the  political 
coloration  of  people  who  called  them  in.  I  assume  the  call-in  must 
have  been  by  proper  governmental  authorities. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  You  know  actually  now  that  the  calling  in  of  the 
Russians  w^as  a  mere  subterfuge,  do  you  not,  upon  the  part  of  the 
Communist  Hungarian  officials  ?     You  know  that,  do  you  not  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  The  calling  in  was  subterfuge,  did  you  say,  sir  ? 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Yes. 

Mr.  Deak.  Soviet  troops  were  stationed  in  Hungary  on  Hungarian 
territory  under  the  Warsaw  Pact. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  You  said  they  were  called  in,  did  you  not? 

Mr.  Deak.  They  were  called  into  Budapest,  I  meant. 

Mr.  Scherer.  That  is  'what  I  mean.  You  said  that  the  Russians 
Avere  called  in  by  the  Hungarians. 

Mr.  Deak.  I  meant  to  say  to  Budapest,  sir. 

Mr.  Scherer.  You  know,  as  a  matter  of  fact,  the  calling  in,  if  there 
was  any  such  calling  in,  was  a  mere  subterfuge,  that  the  Russians 
decided  and  controlled  exclusively  the  movements  to  be  made  in  con- 
nection with  Budapest  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  I  don't  know  that,  sir. 

Air.  Scherer.  You  don't  know  that,  in  spite  of  your  close  connec- 
tion? 

Mr.  Deak.  I  have  no  close  connections  with  the  subject. 

Mr.  Scherer.  You  have  been  identified  as  having  been,  at  least  at 
one  time,  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party.  Since  the  Russian 
atrocities  in  Hungary  which  you  condemn — you  said  it  was  a  mistake 
to  call  them  into  Budapest — have  you  severed  your  connection  with 
the  Communist  Part}'  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

IVIr.  Deak.  In  answer  to  a  question  on  communism,  sir,  I  stated 
before  that  I  consider  there  are  bad  laws  on  our  lawbooks  which 
jeopardize  the  people's  livelihood  and  the  liberty  of  the  American 
])eople.  Therefore,  any  questions  which  have  reference  to  this  sub- 
ject I  am  compelled  to  respectfully  decline  on  the  basis  of  both  the 
first  and  fifth  amendments.    Tliat  is  the  reason  why  I  camiot  answer. 

90121 — 57— pt.  6 2 


380  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

Mr.  ScHERER.  You  don't  consider  the  fifth  amendment  as  one  of 
the  bad  laws  to  which  you  refer,  do  you  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  The  fifth  amendment  is  an  amendment  to  the  Consti- 
tution, or  part  of  the  Constitution. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  That  is  right.  But  you  don't  consider  that  a  bad 
provision  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  No.  I  consider  the  Constitution  in  its  entirety  a  very 
good  bilL 

Mr.  ScHERER.  You  are  refusing  to  answer  my  question  because  you 
say  there  are  certain  bad  laws.  Which  laws  do  you  refer  to — the 
anti-Communist  laws,  the  Internal  Security  Act  of  1950,  the  Com- 
munist Control  Act  of  1954  ?    Are  those  the  bad  laws  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  Yes,  sir.     You  properly  listed  them,  sir. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Are  there  any  others  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  And  the  McCarran  and  Walter  law.  The  Taft-Hartley 
law,  while  we  are  at  it,  I  consider  a  bad  law. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  You  are  opposed  principally  to  the  security  provi- 
sions of  the  McCarran-Walter  Immigration  Act,  those  provisions 
which  make  it  easier  for  us  to  deport  alien  Communists  and  more 
difficult  for  Communists  to  gain  entrance  to  the  United  States.  Are 
those  the  provisions  you  are  specifically  opposed  to  in  the  McCarran- 
Walter  Act? 

Mr.  Deak.  I  believe  that  every  citizen  should  have  equal  rights  in 
this  country,  and  I  particularly  believe  that  there  should  not  be  any 
discrimination  against  foreign-born  people.  That  is  the  reason,  as 
far  as  I  can  formulate  at  this  point,  for  mv  opposition  to  the  Mc- 
Carran-Walter Act. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Are  you  opposed  to  the  security  provisions  because  it 
may  provide  a  means  for  denaturalization  gf  naturalized  citizens  like 
yourself  and  eventually  lead  to  deportation?  Is  that  the  reason  for 
opposition  to  these  laws? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  ScHERER.  You  raised  the  issue  of  bad  laws.  That  is  the  reason 
I  am  going  into  it. 

Mr.  Deak.  I  believe  the  ^IcCarran-Walter  law,  as  a  citizen,  is  a  bad 
law  for  the  people.     That  is  my  opposition  to  it. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Deak.  I  also 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Just  a  minute.  Counsel.  You  understand  the  rules. 
You  are  not  supposed  to  tell  the  witness  wliat  to  answer  on  factual 
matters.  You  are  supposed  to  advise  him  as  to  constitutional  rights. 
You  have  been  telling  him  everything  he  has  said  in  response  to  the 
last  few  questions. 

Mr.  Unger.  Mr.  Scherer,  I  don't  think  that  last  remark  is  quite  fair 
or  accurate. 

Mr.  Scherer.  I  can  hear  you. 

Mr.  Unger.  If  the  whole  point  of  tliis  is  that  you  want  me  to  speak 
up  louder  so  you  hear  it  more  distinctly,  I  have  no  objection.  I  say 
that  with  all  due  respect,  Mr.  Scherer.  I  say  to  you  that  I  am  not  do- 
ing any  more  than  advising  him  of  his  rights  I  don't  think  you  are 
quite  accurate  when  you  say  all  I  have  to  do  is  to  advise  him  of  his 
constitutional  rights.     That  is  not  really  an  accurate  statement. 

Mr.  Scherer.  All  riffht :  his  legal  ri«:lits,  too. 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  381 

Mr.  Unger.  That  is  all  I  am  doing.  When  he  sits  here  and  asks 
me  what  reaction  I  have  to  questions  that  you  ask  him,  I  am  perfectly 
free  to  give  him  my  reaction.  I  don't  think  you  should  object  to  that, 
Mr.  Scherer. 

Mr.  MouLDEii.  Let  us  proceed.     Do  you  have  any  questions  to  ask  ? 

Mr.  Ungek.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  beg  your  pardon.  I  said  no  more 
than  to  answer  Mr.  Scherer. 

Mr.  Scherer.  I  have  no  further  questions. 

Mr.  Arens.  Was  the  conviction  of  the  American  Communist  lead- 
ers a  f  rameup  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Deak.  I  decline  to  answer  this  on  the  basis  of  the  fifth  amend- 
ment. 

Mr.  Arexs.  In  the  December  19-19  issue  of  Political  Affairs,  you 
wrote : 

The  trial  of  the  American  Communist  leaders  took  place  under  the  lying, 
frameup  charge  that  they  "conspired  to  teach  and  advocate  force  and  violence" — 

did  you  not  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  I  decline  to  answer  this  on  the  basis  of  the  fifth 
amendment. 

Mr.  x\rens.  And,  in  1949,  writing  in  the  December  issue  of  Political 
Affairs,  you  attacked  vigorously  another  uprising  which  took  place 
in  Hungar}'  by  the  forces  of  freedom  against  the  Communist  regime, 
did  you  not  ^ 

Mr.  Deak.  I  decline  to  answer  this  question. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Look  at  that  article  in  the  1949  issue  of  Political  Af- 
fairs as  it  is  laid  before  you,  authored  by  yourself,  in  which  you 
vigorously  attack  those  forces  struggling  for  freedom  in  Hungary 
against  the  Communist  masters,  and  tell  us  while  you  are  under 
oath  whether  or  not  you  authored  that  article. 

Mr.  Deak.  I  decline  to  answer  this  on  the  basis  if  the  first  and 
fifth  amendments. 

(Document  marked  '*Deak  Exhibit  Xo.  1,'*  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arexs.  What  names  have  you  been  known  by,  other  than  the 
name  pursuant  to  which  you  have  been  appearing  here  today  ^ 

Mr.  Deak.  Morton  Gracl. 

Mr.  Arexs.  When  did  you  use  the  name  Morton  Grad  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  I  used  that  all  the  time. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Was  that  a  nom  de  plume  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  No.     Zoltan  Deak  is  the  nom  de  plume. 

Mr.  Arexs.  This  Hungarian  club  to  which  you  presently  belong,  is  it 
a  successor  to  the  unit  of  the  International  Workers  Order  which  was 
controlled  by  the  Communists  ^ 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Deak.  I  decline  to  answer  this  on  the  basis  of  the  fifth 
amendment. 

Mr.  Arex'S.  Are  you  a  member,  or  have  you  been  a  member,  of  the 
International  Workers  Order  ( 

Mr.  Deak.  I  decline  to  answer  that  on  the  basis  of  the  fifth 
amendment. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Tlie  fact  is  that  the  roots  of  the  International  Workers 
Order  are  still   in  existence:   isn't   that  true?     Wlieii   the  State  of 


382  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

New  York  dissolved  the  TWO,  all  it  did  was  to  lop  off  the  top ;  isn't 
that  correct  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  I  am  not  aware  of  that. 

Mr.  Arens.  Tell  us,  were  you  a  member  of  the  Communist  fraction 
of  the  IWO  working  among  the  Hungarian  nationality  groups  in  this 
Nation? 

Mr.  Deak.  I  respectfully  decline  decline  to  answer  this  question. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  the  organization,  this  Hungarian  club  to  which  you 
belong,  in  truth  and  in  fact  the  successor  to  the  Hungarian  fraction  of 
the  Communist  Party  within  the  IWO  ? 

]Mr.  Deak.  I  decline  to  answer  this  question  on  the  basis  of  the  fifth 
amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  recall  the  National  Committee  for  Freedom  of 
the  Press?  Have  you  been  identified  with  that  organization,  the  Na- 
tional Committee  for  Freedom  of  the  Press  ? 

Mr,  Deak.  I  cannot  recall  it. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  will  display  before  you  an  exhibit  of  the  Daily  Worker 
(January  21,  1953)  with  reference  to  a-  meeting  organized  by  the 
National  Connnittee  for  Freedom  of  the  Press  in  which  your  name 
a])])ears  in  this  article  as  one  of  those  who  participated.  Would  you 
tell  us  whether  or  not  that  prompts  your  recollection  or  refreshes  your 
memory  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Deak.  I  don't  recall  this. 

(Document  marked  ''Deak  Exhibit  No.  2,"  and  retained  in  commit- 
tee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  A  little  while  ago  in  response  to  questions  posed  by 
Representative  Scherer  you  evidenced  your  hostility  to  the  immigra- 
tion laws.  I  should  like  to  ask  you  if  you  Imow  a  person  by  the  name 
of  Michele  Salerno  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  I  decline  to  answer. 

Mr.  Arens.  He  was  a  Communist  up  for  deportation,  was  he  not  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  I  decline  for  the  same  reason. 

Mr.  Arens.  You,  according  to  this  exhibit,  which  we  are  now  going 
to  display  to  you,  were  one  of  the  sponsors  of  a  testimonial  dinner 
(October  26,  1917)  in  tribute  to  this  Communist  who  was  deported. 
Look  at  that  exhibit  and  see  if  that  refreshes  your  recollection  in  refer- 
ence to  your  interest  in  immigration  matters  and  the  phases  of  the 
immigration  matters  which  whet  your  interest. 

Mr.  Deak.  This  happened  10  years  ago,  and  it  was  possible  that  I 
was  a  sponsor  or  my  name  was  used  without  my  knowledge,  which 
sometimes  happens.     I  can't  recall. 

(Document  marked  "Deak  Exhibit  No.  3,"  and  retained  in  commit- 
tee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  If  you  can't  recall,  that  is  good  enough  for  us. 

You  also  evidenced  to  Mr.  Scherer  your  hostility  to  certain  laws. 
Does  that  hostility  embrace  the  Smith  Act  pursuant  to  which  the  11 
Communist  traitors  were  convicted  for  conspiring  to  overthrow  the 
Government  of  the  United  States  by  force  and  violence  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  liis  counsel.) 

Mr.  Deak.  I  am  opposed  to  the  Smith  Act. 

]Mr.  Arens.  You  joined  in  a  protest  to  Judge  Medina,  did  you  not, 
against  the  jailing  of  the  Communist  traitors  ?     Do  you  recall  that  I 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  383 

Mr.  Deak,  I  don't. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  will  display  before  you  now  a  photostatic  repi-oduc- 
lion  of  the  Daily  Worker  (June  7,  1949)  in  which  your  name  appears 
as  one  who  is  protesting  the  jailing  of  these  Communist  traitors. 
Kindly  glance  at  the  second  page  where  your  name  appears  and  see 
if  that  refreshes  your  recollection. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Wouldn't  that  be  rather  natural,  Mr.  Counsel,  for 
fellow  Communists  to  join  in  such  a  protest? 

Mr.  Arens.  Yes. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Feeling  that  the  law  might  strike  them  one  of  these 
days  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  The  trouble  is  that  the  American  people  do  not  know 
how  many  of  those  who  join  in  such  protests  are  Communists  and  why 
they  have  ulterior  motives. 

( The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Deak.  I  protested  against  the  Smith  Act.  I  must  liave  i)ro- 
tested  at  that  time. 

(Document  marked  "Deak  Exhibit  No.  4,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  You  also  wrote  an  article  in  Political  Affairs  (May 
1949)  in  which  you  were  vigorously  attacking  Cardinal  Mindszenty, 
and  the  cardinal's  activities  in  Hungary,  isn't  that  correct  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  I  decline  to  answer  this  on  the  basis  of  the  fifth  amend- 
ment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Look  at  this  article  and  see  if  this  refreshes  your 
recollection  with  reference  to  your  charges  of  treason  against  Cardi- 
nal Mindszenty  and  against  the  officials  of  the  Government  of  the 
United  States  in  their  position  on  the  Mindszenty  case.  See  if  that 
lefreshes  your  recollection  in  reference  to  your  position  in  the  Com- 
munist-controlled publication.  Political  Affairs. 

Mr.  Deak.  I  decline  to  identify  this. 

(Document  marked  "Deak  Exhibit  No.  5,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr,  Akens.  I  respectfully  suggest,  Mr.  Chairman,  that  would  con- 
clude the  staff'  interrogation  of  this  witness. 

Mr.  Moulder.  All  documents  referred  to  by  counsel  and  presented 
to  the  witness  will  be  made  a  part  of  the  record. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Mr.  Deak,  you  said  in  response  to  one  of  my  previous 
questions  that  after  the  Eussian  army  moved  into  Budapest  you  wrote 
an  article  or  two.     How  many  articles  did  you  write? 

Mr.  Deak.  On  this  question  in  general?  We  keep  on  writing  on 
this  subject  so  I  must  have  written  several  articles. 

Mr.  Scherer.  And  your  criticism  went  to  the  extent  of  saying  that 
the  Communist  Hungarian  regime  made  a  mistake  in  asking  the  Rus- 
sian troops  to  move  into  Budapest,  is  that  right  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  I  said  they  made  a  tragic  error — fatal  and  tragic  error, 
or  something  to  that  eft'ect. 

Mr.  Scherer.  The  Hungarian-American  readers  of  your  j^aper 
would  not  have  tolerated  any  other  position.  If  you  had  taken  any 
other  position  your  paper  would  have  gone  out  of  existence,  would  it 
not  ? 


384  CO]\IMUNIST    PROPAGANDA   IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

Mr.  Deak.  As  a  matter  of  fact,  there  was  some  opposition  to  that 
attitude  among  our  readers  as  manifested  in  letters  coming  to  the 
newspaper. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Those  were  the  Communist  readers  of  your  pub- 
lication, were  they  not? 

Mr.  Deak.  I  decline  to  answer  this  question. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  You  don't  mean  to  tell  us  that  the  Hungarian  com- 
mimity  in  New  York  that  reads  your  paper  would  have  tolerated  for 
one  minute  any  defense  on  your  part  whatsoever  of  the  action  of  the 
Russians  and  the  atrocities  that  were  committed  in  Budapest,  would 
they? 

INIr.  Deak.  As  I  stated  before,  I  said  that  there  was  a  lot  of  opposi- 
tion to  that  statement 

Mr.  ScHERER.  You  mean  opposition  to  the  position  you  took  with 
reference  to  condemning  the  Hungarian  Communist  regime  by  Hun- 
garians ? 

Mr.  Deak.  With  reference  to  the  October  23  events  and  the  calling 
in  of  the  Soviet  troops,  there  was  opposition  and  we  published  a  lot 
of  letters  which  appeared  in  the  newspaper. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Maybe  I  misunderstand  you.  My  question  assumed 
that  there  was  a  lot  of  opposition  from  the  Hungarian  community, 
and  that  is  putting  it  mildly.  Wasn't  there  almost  a  revolution 
among  the  Hungarian  community  to  what  happened  in  Hungary? 
Wasn't  it  almost  universal  ?  Wasn't  there  almost  a  universal  opposi- 
tion and  condemnation  of  tlie  Russians  and  the  Hungarian  puppet 
Communist  regime  in  the  Hungarian  community?    Isn't  that  right? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Deak.  There  are 

Mr.  Scherer.  These  people  who  you  said  have  an  abiding  love  for 
their  native  land  and  the  people  of  Hungary,  didn't  that  group  revolt 
and  didn't  they  severely  condemn  actions  of  the  Russians  and  the 
puppet  Hungarian  Communist  regime?  Didn't  your  whole  com- 
munity^ revolt  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  I  can  only  speak,  sir,  on  the  basis  of  the  letters  that 
come  into  our  paper  from  our  readers.    I  cannot  in  truth — 

]Mr.  Scherer.  I  am  not  a  Hungarian,  but  I  know  that  took  place 
and  everybody  else  in  this  room  knows  the  Hungarians  resented  it  ter- 
rifically. You  only  know  from  the  letters  tliat  came  into  your 
paper  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  Mostly  on  the  basis  of  that. 

I^fr.  Scherer.  And  those  letters  you  say  opposed  the  actions  of  the 
Russians  in  entering  Budapest,  is  that  what  you  are  telling  us? 

Mr.  Deak.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Then  I  didn't  misunderstand  you.  Tliey  approved 
the  action,  the  letters  that  came  into  your  paper,  is  that  right  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  Some  of  our  readers  approved,  some  had  reservations, 
some  opposed  it.  Everybody  tried  to  interpret  it  to  his  understanding 
of  what  actually  transpired.  Most  of  our  readers  were  land-lease 
peasants  as  much  as  I  know  them,  who  came  out  from  Hungary  because 
they  could  not  make  a  living.  More  than  2  million  Hungarians  came 
out  from  Hungary  before  the  First  World  War.  The  readers  of  our 
paper  belong  to  this  group,  who  were  land-lease  poor  peasants  who 
could  not  make  an  existence  and  who  also  remembered  what  came  after 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  385 

the  First  World  War  in  the  Horthy  times.  Therefore  they  have  some 
knowledg-e  of  tlie  events  that  were  behind  the  October  events  in 
Ilmigary. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Certainly  everybody  approved  the  Hungarian  effort 
to  throw  over  the  Communist  puppet  regime. 

Mr.  Deak.  They  formed  their  own  views  in  their  own  minds  and 
hearts.  They  communicated  it  to  our  paper  and  I,  as  an  editor,  pub- 
lished it  in  our  newspaper.  As  I  said,  there  were  various  views.  Some 
people  interpreted  the  October  23  events  as  an  attempt  of  those  peo- 
ple— the  big  landlords  who  had  been  expropriated  in  1945 — as  an  at- 
tempt on  the  part  of  the  big  landlords  and  former  Horthyite  elements 
to  regain  power. 

Mr,  Scherer.  This  was  a  revolt  of  young  people  and  students,  17, 
18, 19,  20  year  olds. 

Mr.  Deak.  Utilizing  the  grave  mistakes  which  have  been  made  in 
the  last  few  years  which  led  youth  and  other  elements  of  the  people 
to  try  to  change  certain  aspects  of  the  economic  and  political  life  in 
Hungary,  coming  as  it  did  in  the  midst  of  a  cold  war  and  other  factors, 
the  developments  took  such  an  unfortunate  and  regrettable  turn. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Don't  you  think  that  Hungary  should  have  had  self- 
determination  rather  than  using  the  Russian  troops  to  settle  this  inter- 
]ial  conflict  in  Plungary? 

Mr.  Deak.  As  n  matter  of  fact,  in  one  article  I  wrote  T  did  make 
reference  to  the  right  of  self-determination  of  the  people.  I  l^elieve  in 
is  very  much.  But  of  course  this  element,  like  any  other  element,  is 
not  a  pure  situation  that  appears  in  any  given  country.  Basically  I 
believe  in  that.  I  believe  the  Hungarian  people  should  determine  for 
themselves  what  kind  of  existence  they  want  to  live  in.  They  lived 
for  1,000  years  under  another  type  of  social  and  economic  system,  and 
the  result  of  it  was  that  2  million  of  them  came  to  the  United  States 
because  they  were  starving  there  and  2  million  of  them  died  in  two 
world  wai-s.  That  is  why  they  tried  a  new  system  for  12  years. 
Obviously  it  was  not  as  easy  to  build  in  12  years  a  new  order.  It  takes 
]nore  than  that  to  develop  it,  to  remove  imperfections  and  injustices. 

Mr.  Scherer.  And  now  thousands  and  thousands  of  them  are  com- 
ing to  the  United  States  and  other  countries  of  the  world  because  of 
Communist  persecution  and  because  of  the  atrocities. 

Mr.  Deak.  Ma}^  I  say,  sir,  or  may  I  quote  you  Dr.  Saunders,  the 
head  of  the  Save  the  Children  Federation,  who  stated  that  of  those 
people  who  left  Hungary 

Mr.  Scherer.  Answer  the  question. 

Mr.  Deak.  I  am  answering  the  question,  sii-.  One-fifth  of  those 
who  fled  Hungary  during  this  period  were  freedom  fighters,  two-fifths 
were  common  criminals,  and  two-fifths  came  for  economic  reasons 
which  had  no  relationship  whatsoever  with  the  present 

Mr.  Scherer.  Two-fifths  were  common  criminals? 

Mr.  Deak.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Scherer.  We  want  to  worry  about  that,  Mr.  Counsel,  in  the 
amendments  to  the  McCarran-Walter  Immigration  Act. 

How  many  were  Communists?  You  told  us  about  the  common 
criminals,  the  freedom  fighters,  and  others. 

Mr.  Deak.  It  is  not  my  statement.  I  am  quoting  you  Dr.  Saunders, 
head  of  the  Save  the  Children  Federation.     It  is  a  statement  which 


386  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

appeared  in  the  New  York  Times  and  I  am  simply  quoting  it  as  one 
estimate  of  the  people  who  left  Hungary. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Was  there  any  estimate  as  to  how  many  Communist 
Hungarians  came  over  ?  You  know  when  the  first  revolt  took  place,  a 
lot  of  the  Communists  fled,  didn't  they  ?  That  is,  fled  Hungary.  The 
first  revolt  was  a  revolt  of  the  people  of  Hungary  against  the  Commu- 
nists in  Hungary.  The  first  group  that  came  over  and  fled  across  the 
border  were  the  Communists.  When  the  Russians  came  in,  the  free- 
dom fighters  left.  Do  you  have  any  idea  how  many  Communists 
came  over  in  that  first  group  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  Sir,  I  have  quoted  you  the  statement  of  Dr.  Saunders. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  I  don't  care  about  the  other  statements.  I  am  asking 
you,  you  are  apparently  an  expert. 

Mr.  Deak.  I  am  in  no  position  to  tell  you. 

Mr.  Scherer.  You  write  on  these  subjects  every  day. 

Mr.  Deak.  I  know.     I  just  know  what  I  see  in  the  papers. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Is  that  all  ?     I  know  that,  too. 

^Ir.  Deak.  So  I  am  just  trying  to  get  the  gist  of  the  situation  as 
it  is  reflected  in  the  press. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Do  the  readers  of  your  paper  know  that  you  were 
a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  I  respectfully  decline  to  answer  this  on  the  basis  of  the 
fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Aeens.  Do  you  follow  the  line  of  the  international  Communist 
apparatus  in  your  paper? 

Mr.  Deak.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  basis  of  the  first  and  fifth 
amendments. 

Mr.  Moulder.  With  reference  to  the  refugees  that  you  and  Con- 
gressman Scherer  have  been  discussing,  have  you  had  any  contact 
with  any  of  them  who  have  come  over  recently  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  Yes,  sir ;  I  have. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Have  you  made  any  effort  to  organize  them  into  any 
organizational  group  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  No,  sir ;  certainly  not. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Did  they  contact  you  or  did  you  contact  them  ? 

Mr,  Deak.  They  came  to  our  place  of  business,  a  few.  Wliile  we 
are  at  it,  some  of  them  who  claim  that  they  want  to  go  back,  I  told 
them  that  1  month  in  the  United  States  is  not  enough  to  find  out  the 
value  of  being  in  the  United  States.  I  told  them  that^  have  been 
in  his  country  for  30  years  and  I  went  through  some  very  hard  times. 
I  was  unemployed  for  years.  But  I  certainly  didn't  think  that  being 
here  1  month  should  be  enough  for  a  person  to  determine  whether  he 
wants  to  stay  or  not.  I  told  that  to  one  of  those  people  who  came  to 
me. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Do  you  have  any  knowledge  or  information  as  to  any 
of  those  persons  you  have  come  in  personal  contact  with  of  being 
active  Communists  or  sympathizers  for  the  Soviet  Union  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  Sir,  I  never  ask  anj^body  who  comes  up  to  our  place 
what  his  affiliation  is.  If  a  person  comes  and  asks  for  help,  I  am 
trying  to  help  him  to  the  best  of  my  ability. 

Mr.  Scherer.  I  don't  think  that  answers  the  chairman's  question. 

Mr.  Deak.  I  am  not  aware.  I  never  inquired.  In  fact,  some  of 
them  expressed  very  condemnatory  views  as  to  the  situation  in  Hun- 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  387 

gary.  But  inasmuch  as  they  were  unable  to  get  a  job  here  they  still 
wanted 

Mr.  Moulder.  You  say  expressed  comdemnatory 

Mr.  Deak.  Being  opposed,  yes. 

Mr.  Moulder.  You  mean  in  sympathy  with  the  Soviet  Union? 

Mr.  Deak.  Xo,  sir.  They  opposed  many  aspects  of  living  in  Hun- 
gary. Some  of  them  wlio  came  asked  us  what  they  should  do  to  get 
back. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  They  oppose  it  but  they  want  to  go  back  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  They  criticized  the  situation  in  Hungary.  They  said 
there  were  very  many  bad  things  and  they  probably  would  live  poorer 
but  for  some  reason  or  other  these  particular  persons  I  am  talking 
about  wanted  to  go  back. 

Mr.  Scherer.  They  criticized  the  situation  in  Hungary.  You  mean 
they  opposed  the  Communist  regime  and  control  of  Hungary?  Is 
that  right? 

Mr.  Deak.  At  least  economic  aspects.  They  were  all  very  critical 
as  to  the  economic  standards  they  lived  under. 

Mr.  Scherer,  They  said  nothing  about  the  Communist  regime  or 
what  happened  in  Hungary  recently? 

Mr.  Deak,  That  is  all  I  can  tell  you,  sir,  as  I  told  you  so  far. 

Mr.  Scherer.  "WHiere  did  you  get  this  figure  that  two-fifths  of  those 
who  came  over  were  common  criminals  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  That  is  from  Dr.  Saunders,  president  of  the  Save  the 
Children  Federation,  It  is  a  national  organization,  Dr,  Saunders 
was  in  Austria  and  investigated  the  camps  in  which  Hungarian  refu- 
gees are  living.  After  I  believe  2  weeks  of  visit  and  investigation 
he  came  back  and  made  a  statement  to  the  representatives  of  the  Amer- 
ican press. 

Mr,  Scherer,  And  that  is  the  only  knowledge  you  have,  that  is, 
that  which  was  reported  by  Dr.  Saunders  ?     Is  that  right  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  As  to  those  specific  facts  and  figui-es. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Do  you  have  any  opinions  of  your  own  from  what 
you  have  learned  as  to  how  many  were  common  criminals,  how  many 
were  Communists? 

]VIr.  Deak.  I  could  not  possibly  because  I  did  not  investigate,  I 
was  never  present  in  the  processing  of  any  of  these  people  and  I  con- 
tacted only  a  few, 

Mr,  Arexs.  Do  you  think  he  might  have  been  referring  to  crimi- 
nals as  political  prisoners  ? 

Mr,  Deak.  I  am  not  sure  now  of  the  exact  text  of  the  article  but  he 
referred  that  many  jails  were  opened  in  consequence  of  the  upheavals 
and  as  a  result  of  that  many  criminals  came  over. 

Mr.  Moulder.  They  would  be  common  criminals  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  Common. 

Mr.  Scherer,  "What  other  classification  did  j'ou  give  us  ? 

Mr.  Deak,  The  final  two-fifths  were  people  who  came  due  to  eco- 
nomic compulsion.  That  is,  who  would  have  left  Hmigary  regardless 
of  tlie  events  if  they  had  an  opportmiity  sooner. 

Mr.  Moltlder.  In  other  words,  as  I  understand,  only  one-fifth  were 
those  who  were  seeking  refuge  as  a  result  of  tlieir  opposition  to  the 
Communist  or  Soviet  regime  ? 

Mr.  Deak.  That  is  Dr.  Saunders'  estimate. 


388  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

Mr.  ScHERER.  "We  are  taking  two-fifths  common  criminals  and  two- 
fifths  of  the  people  on  welfare  in  Hungary  ? 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  witness  is  excused.  You  may  claim  your  wit- 
ness fee  with  the  clerk  of  the  committee. 

(Witness  excused.) 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  committee  will  stand  in  recess  for  5  minutes. 

(Brief  recess.) 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  committee  will  be  in  order.  Call  your  next  wit- 
ness. 

Mr.  Aeens.  Catherine  Gyarmat3^ 

Mr.  Moulder.  Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  in  the  testimony  you  give 
this  subcommittee  you  will  tell  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and  nothing 
but  the  truth,  so  hel])  you  God  ? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  Yes. 

TESTIMONY  OF  CATHERINE  GYARMATY,,  ACCOMPANIED  BY 
COUNSEL,  DAVID  FREEDMAN 

Mr.  Arens.  Please  identify  yourself  by  name,  residence,  and  occu- 
pation. 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  Catherine  Gyarmaty,  1040  Fox  Street,  in  the 
Bronx,  editor  oft  he  Hungarian  women's  magazine,  Nok  Vilaga. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  appearing  today  in  response  to  a  subpena 
served  upon  you  by  the  House  Un-American  Activities  Committee? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  represented  by  counsel  ? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  Yes. 

Mr.  Freedman.  David  Freedman,  F-r-e-e-d-m-a-n,  320  Broadway, 
New  York  City. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  is  the  circulation  of  Nok  Vilaga  ? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  About  2,500. 

Mr.  Arens.  How  long  have  you  been  editor  of  the  publication? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  Since  1941. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  firm  publishes  the  publication  ? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  Nok  Vilaga,  Inc. 

Mr.  Arens.  Who  are  the  principal  officers  ? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  Margaret  Torok,  Clara  Reich  as  secretary,  and 
Catherine  Gyarmaty,  as  treasurer. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  is  the  address  of  Nok  Vilaga  ? 

Miss  Gyarmaty,  130  East  16th  Street,  New  York  City. 

Mr.  Arens.  That  is  the  same  address  as  the  Russky  Golos  and  the 
Hungarian  Word,  is  it  not  ? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  It  is. 

Mr.  i^ENS.  Are  you  a  Communist? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  You  are  implying  with  this  question  to  incrimi- 
nate me.  I  decline  to  answer  it  under  my  rights  of  the  fifth  amend- 
ment of  the  American  Constitution. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  John  Lautner  2  days  ago  before  this  committee  took 
an  oath  and  identified  you  as  a  Communist.  Was  he  lying  or  telling 
the  truth  ? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  same  basis. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Did  you  ask  her  yet  whether  she  was  naturalized  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  I  am  ffoins  to.    Is  it  Mrs.  or  Miss  ? 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  389 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  I  am  a  divorcee,  so  I  don't  know  how  to  define  it. 

Mr.  Arexs  Wliere  were  you  born  ? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  In  Hungary. 

Mr.  Arens.  "\^nien  did  you  come  to  the  United  States  for  perma- 
nent residence  ? 

Miss  GyarjViaty.  In  1922. 

Mr,  Arens.  Are  you  a  citizen  of  this  country  ? 

Miss  Gyariviaty.  I  am. 

Mr.  Arens.  By  naturalization  or  derivation? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  By  naturalization. 

Mr.  Arens.  Wliere  and  when  were  you  naturalized  ? 

Miss  Gyar^iaty.  In  the  common  pleas  court  in  New  Jersey,  1928. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Were  you  a  member  of  the  Commmiist  Party  at  the 
time  you  were  naturalized  ? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  same  basis,  sir. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Were  you  asked  any  questions  with  reference  to 
membership  in  an  organization  dedicated  to  the  overthrow  of  this 
Government  by  force  and  violence  at  the  time  you  made  application 
for  citizenship  ? 

ISIiss  Gyarmaty.  I  can't  remember  those  questions. 

Mr.  Scherer.  If  you  had  been  asked  that  question,  what  would 
your  answer  have  been  ? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  I  decline  to  answer. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Miss  Gyarmaty,  Mr.  Bonora,  investigator  for  this  com- 
mittee, is  going  to  read  each  of  two  translations  from  the  February 
(1957)  issue  of  your  publication.  I  would  like  to  have  you  follow  him 
in  the  publication,  and  you  check  him  now  and  be  sure  that  he  gives  a 
correct  translation  of  the  language. 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  What  page  ? 

Mr.  Arexs.  He  will  tell  you  the  page. 

Mr.  Boxora.  This  is  entitled  "'Come  on  Home." 

The  National  Council  of  Hungarian  Women  sent  a  letter  to  the  Women's 
International  Democratic  Federation  to  forward  their  appeal  everywhere.  The 
appeal  is  the  followiujr : 

"In  the  near  past  weeks  a  great  storm  broke  out  over  Hungary.  After  this 
storm,  it  is  our  will  that  life  shall  begin  in  a  cleaner  atmosphere,  we  want  to 
build  a  socialist  country,  and  a  society  that  is  really  free. 

"But  the  storm  did  demand  a  lot  of  victims.  Young  lives  were  lost,  homes 
are  in  ruins,  and  families  are  scattered.  More  than  100,000  of  our  countrymen 
left  the  country,  partly  because  they  fell  under  the  influence  of  foreign  propa- 
ganda. Many  of  them  young,  below  the  age  of  18,  almost  kids,  who  in  the 
mood  for  adventure,  led  by  false  promises  and  false  reports,  left  tlaeir  families, 
in  many  instances  without  consent  and  in  many  instances  without  notifying 
their  parents. 

"Many  a  Hungarian  family  and  many  a  mother  cries  for  her  child,  and  they 
would  do  everything  if  they  could  embrace  them.  A  great  part  of  these  thought- 
less and  badly  informed  youths  would  return  to  their  homes  if  they  would  know 
that  there  was  no  reason  for  their  running  away,  and  if  they  would  know  that 
their  families,  friends,  and  the  whole  country  waits  for  them  with  love  and 
understanding.  Many  of  them,  who  are  disillusioned,  because  of  their  love  for 
their  country  came  back  and  started  to  work  or  study  again,  and  spent  Christmas 
and  New  Year  with  those  dearest  and  closest  to  them.  But  there  are  still  many 
who  do  not  dare  to  face  the  truth.  They  listen  to  the  distorted  news  in  radio 
and  newspapers. 

"The  Hungarian  mothers  ask  for  the  aid  of  the  WIDF  (Women's  Interna- 
tional Democratic  Federation),  the  women's  organizations,  and  every  mother  to 
help  in  their  respective  countries,  to  bring  l)ack  to  their  families  the  boys  and 
girls.     Help  them  to  know  the  truth,  that  we  are  waiting  for  them,  they  shall 


390  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

not  be  afraid,  as  those  who  already  came  home,  know.  We  don't  promise  theiu 
an  easier  life,  because  our  country  must  still  conquer  the  hardships,  but  we 
promise  them  understanding  and  love,  and  we  promise  to  help  in  building  a  kind 
of  country  which  will  parallel  with  the  desires  of  the  best  amongst  them.  We 
need  their  young  hearts  and  young  arms. 

"We  ask  you  to  publish  this  in  your  paper.  Go  to  the  camp  of  the  escapees, 
where  the  young  Hungarians  are,  seek  out  the  Hungarian  youth  at  their  place 
of  work,  tell  them  what  you  would  say  to  your  own  kids,  that  their  mother, 
family,  and  country  is  waiting  for  them  with  open  arms  and  honest  love. 

"With  warmest  greetings, 

"The  National  Council  of  Hungarian  Women, 
"Anna  Bodonyi,  Secretary." 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  that  a  true  and  correct  translation  ? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.    It  is  correct. 

(Docimient  marked  ''Gyarmaty  Exhibit  No.  1,"  and  retained  in 
committee  files. ) 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Bonora,  will  you  read  a  translation  of  another 
article  from  the  same  issue,  February  1957,  Nok  Vilaga,  and  we 
would  like  to  have  you  follow  him  in  the  Hmigarian  and  tell  us  at 
the  conclusion  of  his  reading  whether  or  not  that  is  a  true  and  correct 
translation. 

Mr.  BoxoRA.  This  is  entitled  ''Through  My  Eyeglasses,*'  a  column 
by  Catherine  Gyarmaty. 

Mr.  Arens.  That  is  yourself,  is  it  not  ? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  Yes. 

Mr.  BoNORA  (reading)  : 

A  dear  and  old  reader  of  ours  sent  us  a  letter  in  which  she  asks  us  to  cancel  her 
subscription  to  the  Hungarian  Word  and  the  Women's  World.  This  letter  was 
painful,  because  this  woman  of  ours  at  one  time  was  for  a  long  period  a  press 
director  of  our  paper,  and  who  at  the  time  sent  us  a  lot  of  new  subscribers. 

In  her  letter  she  writes  in  detail  how  disillusioned  she  was  in  relation  to  the 
situation  in  Hungary — how  dissatisfied  she  has  been  that  on  the  packages  she 
has  sent  to  her  needy  relatives,  high  duty  taxes  had  to  be  paid.  Although  she 
does  not  blame  us,  but  because  we  have  given  so  much  support  to  that  system, 
she  has  no  desire  any  more  for  our  publications. 

The  fact  is  that  both  papers,  in  its  entirety,  brought  out  all  the  progress,  con- 
struction, social  gains  that  happened  to  aid  the  happiness  of  the  Hungarian 
people.  We  brought  this  out  and  were  happy  to  do  so  because  we  solemnly 
believed  that  all  this  was  never  there  before  in  the  thousand-year-old  history  of 
the  Hungarian  people.  We  not  only  knew  the  Hungarian  past,  but  because  we 
came  from  there,  we  knew  what  was  left  there — what  was  their  life. 

All  that  we,  for  over  a  year,  brought  through  pictures  in  the  Women's  World 
was  true.  It  was  true  that  the  Hungarian  people  were  given  such  a  constitution, 
the  kind  they  never  had  before.  It  was  true  that  the  right  to  work,  equal  rights 
to  women,  even  the  right  to  vacations,  was  guaranteed  to  the  Hungarian  people. 
It  was  true  that  the  children  of  simple  people  could  go  to  the  universities,  and 
that  this  was  so  is  not  idle  talk. 

The  witnesses  are  many  American-Hungarians,  to  whom  it  is  written  from 
home,  that  the  children  of  peasant  relatives  are  preparing  to  become  engineers, 
professors,  doctors,  or  other  professions,  even  army  officers.  I,  myself,  spoke  to  a 
woman  in  Stalin  City,  who  with  her  husband  and  two  other  sons  worked  on  a 
construction  but  had  one  son  an  army  officer  and  a  daughter  at  the  Pest  Uni- 
versity. I  saw,  myself,  Stalin  City  in  feverish  construction,  saw  the  new  work- 
ers' homes  in  many  places  and  the  new  schools. 

It  is  true  that  in  case  of  sickness  the  patient  received  free  medical  treatment, 
free  hospitalization,  dental  care  was  also  free,  and  eyeglasses  were  free.  Workers 
went  through  a  systematic  medical  examination  so  they  were  able  to  detect 
serious  illnesses  in  its  early  stages  and  treat  it.  It  goes  without  saying  that  the 
American  worker  knows  how  to  appreciate  this,  because  he  knows  what  it  means 
to  be  sick  here,  how  it  takes  away  his  hard-earned  savings,  and  he  knows  even 
better  if  he  had  no  money  saved  what  kind  of  medical  aid  he  receives  under  such 
circumstances.     Although  for  this  country  war  brought  riches,  for  Hungary,  ruins, 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  391 

gigantic  loss  in  men,  misery,  starvation,  and  tens  of  thousands  of  orphans 
and  waifs. 

There  were  mistakes,  and  as  later  revealed,  serious  mistakes.  About  these 
generally  we  have  only  recently  gained  some  orientation.  So  there  were  not 
enough  schools  and  some  circles  have  suggested  that  in  the  new  5-year  plan,  if 
there  is  not  enough  money,  then  some  other,  less  important  thing,  should  be  cut, 
and  new  schools  should  be  built.  It  seems  that  the  building  of  living  quarters 
was  also  insufl5cient  because,  in  spite  of  our  known  and  described  feverish  con- 
struction, there  still  was  "doubling  up"  and  newlyweds  had  to  live  with  their 
parents  and  other  members  of  their  family,  or  even  wrose,  the  new  wife  and  the 
new  husband  had  to  live  separately  with  their  own  parents. 

Mr,  ScHERER.  That  happens  in  this  country. 
Mr.  BoNORA  (continuing)  : 

There  was  a  lot  of  complaint  about  the  leaders  of  the  housing  authority,  and 
]ierhaps  justified,  but  if  there  would  have  been  enough  homes,  there  would  be  no 
need  for  the  housing  authority. 

As  we  have  learned  the  nice  and  good  "constitution"  was  not  carried  out  in 
all  its  points.  Why,  we  don't  know.  Is  it  because  of  the  newly  developed  situa- 
tions that  made  it  impossible  or  because  the  officers  were  permeated  with  bureau- 
cratism and  they  lost  sight  of  the  rights  of  the  Hungarian  iieople,  only  sqtieeziug 
their  duties  out  of  them — it  would  be  hard  to  establish.  Most  likely  this  would 
be  the  starting  p<^)iut.  Wages  were  not  enough,  and  this  is  important.  The 
Hungarian  people  did  not  starve ;  even  the  escapees  would  not  say  this,  their 
looks  don't  show  hunger.  But  there  was  very  little  for  anything  else  or  nothing, 
and  this  brought  out  the  bitterness.  Our  woman  companion,  in  her  bitter  letter, 
brings  out  the  fact  that  American  parcels  with  completely  used  clothing  were 
highly  taxed  for  duty.  We  have  heard  this  complaint  many  times  but  while  we, 
ourselves,  could  not  understand  it,  somehow  we  just  thought  that  the  Hungarian 
Government  most  likely  had  a  good  reason  for  this  arrangement.  I  confess  that 
«  complacency  we  acknowledged  this  without  criticism,  but  it  should  serve  as  an 
extenuating  circumstance,  that  many  others  got  letters  in  which  they  thought 
there  is  no  need  for  packages  and  also  read  such  letters  that  the  value  and  use 
of  the  received  goods  were  higher  than  the  paid  duty.  I  understand  this  when 
only  used  goods  was  received  but  when  good  goods  was  received,  then  the  duty 
was  worth  it. 

For  all  this — they  placed  the  responsibility  on  the  Rakosi-Gero  government 
and  there  is  no  doubt  they  have  part  in  it,  but  when  in  the  workers'  papers  I 
read  about  "Rakosi-Gero  click,"  I  am  somewhat  indignant.  According  to  the  dic- 
tionary, the  word  "click"  means  a  gang  and  is  used  to  mean  when  individuals 
conspire  to  exploit  others  to  advance  their  own  gains.  Let's  see — can  we  apply 
this  on  Rakosi  or  GeroV  As  we  know,  Rakosi  spent  16  years  in  the  jails  of 
Horthy,  which  is  no  small  thing.  Can  it  be  visualized  that  lie  was  ready  for  this 
much  sacrifice  for  the  misery  of  the  Himgarian  people?  Or  let's  take  Gero.  I 
don't  know  his  past  well,  but  every  Hungarian  can  tell  you  that  he  spent  20  to  22 
years  around  the  bridge  constructions,  and  Hungary  can  be  thankful,  for  the 
almost  destroyed  system  of  bridges  was  not  only  rehabilitated,  but  is  in  better 
.shape  than  ever  before.  It  may  be  that  Rakosi  and  Gero  got  rich  from  this. 
They  could  have  established  a  faulty  system.  They  could  have  lost  from  sight 
the  important  things.  In  their  ambition,  they  might  have  taken  away  lawful 
rights,  perhaps  created  things  too  much  on  the  Russian  pattern,  but  the  gigantic 
progress  and  consruction  going  on  in  the  country  for  11  years,  one  cannot,  and 
it  is  not  right  to  talk  only  of  mistakes,  and  brand  them  with  the  name  of  "gang." 
Let  us  not  forget  for  a  second  that  for  the  suffering  of  the  Hungarian  people, 
besides  Rakosi  and  Gero,  the  stubborn  cold  war  is  also  responsible. 

All  the  mistakes  committed  against  the  Hungarian  public  by  the  removal  of 
Rakosi  and  Gero,  and  others  who  helped  them,  could  have  been  easily  corrected, 
but  not  in  one  stroke.  But  most  certainly,  if  the  counterrevolutionary  gang,  in 
alliance  with  the  cold  war  "West,"  would  not  exploit  this  with  such  powerful 
force,  which  took  the  nation  to  the  brink  of  disaster,  and  it  will  need  a  hard 
struggle  until  the  22d  of  October,  1956  (the  day  before  the  uprising),  living 
conditions  will  be  reestablished.  Many  thousands  have  run  away  but  the  ones 
who  remain  face  a  dreadful  winter  and  unemployment. 

But  the  Hungarian  i>eople  will  overcome  this,  we  don't  know  how  soon,  and 
at  what  sacrifice  but  overcome  it  they  will.  My  fellow  woman  should  not  have 
departed  so  soon  from  those  newspapers  that  were  enthusiastic  for  the  well- 


392  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

being  of  the  Hungarian  people,  even  if  these  papers  did  not  see  the  mistakes ;  even 
then  before  our  eyes  we  only  held  the  happiness  of  our  former  country,  and  if 
there  were  a  lot  of  mistakes  in  the  government  of  the  new  system,  the  happiness 
of  the  Hungarian  people  cannot  be  restored  by  the  old  exploiting  system,  but 
only  by  a  new  democratic  system,  by  the  will  of  the  people  which  we  will  con- 
tinue to  support  with  a  more  critical  eye. 

And  we  believe  that  the  fellow  woman,  whose  son  was  amongst  the  first  to  die 
in  the  war  against  fascism,  and  with  whom  at  the  time  I  cried  together  for  the 
young  son — one  day  she  will  return  to  us,  with  understanding  that  we  struggle 
for  the  happiness  of  our  former  country  and  its  people,  and  for  the  freedom 
of  the  peoples  of  all  nations,  as  well  as  for  our  own  complete  democracy. 

Mr.  Akens.  Is  the  reading  of  Mr.  Bonora  a  true  and  correct  transla- 
tion of  the  article  by  yourself  in  the  February  issue  of  your  publica- 
tion ? 

Miss  Gyarmatt.  I  assume  so. 

(Document  marked  "Gyarmaty  Exhibit  No.  2,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  ScHERER.  I  gather  from  that  article  it  did  three  things.  It 
praised  the  economic  conditions  in  Hungary  under  the  Communists, 
condemned  the  freedom  fighters,  and  was  silent  on  any  condemnation 
of  the  Russian  atrocities  in  Hungary,  She  condemned  the  freedom 
fighters.     She  referred  to  them  as  the  counterrevolutionary  gang. 

It  did  three  things :  Praise  the  economic  conditions  of  Hungary  un- 
der the  Communist  regime,  condemn  the  freedom  fighters,  and  is 
strangely  silent  on  the  Communist  Russian  atrocities  in  Hungary. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  did  you  get  the  notion  that  the  forces  under- 
taking to  overthrow  the  Communist  terrorist  regime  in  Hungary  were 
a  counterrevolutionary  gang  ? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  Sir,  I  Imow  that  many  people  who  were  the  former 
owners  of  the  land  or  the  factories,  or  whatever  they  had,  remained 
in  Hungary.  In  the  later  years,  the  Hmigarian  Government  gave 
amnesty  to  people  who  ran  away  from  the  country  and  many  of  them 
returned.  Many  of  these  people  were  staying  in  the  neighboring 
Austria  and  returned  with  an  aim,  and  they  were  working  on  the 
Hungarian  people  to  get  back  their  former  position. 

Mr.  Scherer.  You  mentioned  in  one  of  your  articles  that  the  free- 
dom fighters,  or,  as  you  call  them,  a  revolutionary  gang,  were  the 
young  people,  the  students,  and  the  fine  young  people  of  Hungary. 
You  are  asking  them  to  come  back  to  Hungary ;  that  all  is  forgiven. 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  Sir,  I  was  not  asking  them.  The  Hungarian 
mothers  were  asking  them. 

Mr.  Scherer,  You  approved  that,  did  you  not,  because  you  pub- 
lished it  in  your  paper?  You  approved  that  appeal  for  these  boys, 
and  in  the  one  article  you  call  these  people  a  revolutionary  gan^  and 
in  the  other  article  you  are  saying  what  fine  people  they  are — -You 
should  come  back;  all  is  forgiven;  come  home  to  mother."  Where  is 
there  any  consistency  in  those  two  articles  ? 

Miss  Gyarmaty,  I  think  so. 

Mr.  Moulder,  As  I  understand  your  position,  you  object  to  the 
people  making  an  effort  to  reclaim  their  property  and  their  individual 
free  enterprise — the  property  which  they  owned  before  and  which 
was  confiscated  by  the  Soviet  form  of  government  or  the  Comnnmist 
form  of  government.  Is  that  the  way  I  understand  your  position 
to  be? 

(No  response,) 


COIVIMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  393 

Mr.  MoTJLDER.  You  condemn  the  efforts  on  the  part  of  the  people 
to  reclaim  property  which  they  formerly  owned  until  invaded  and 
taken  over  by  the  Communist  regime ;  you  call  them  a  counterrevolu- 
tionary gang.    Is  that  the  way  I  understand  your  position  ? 

Miss  GyarjMaty.  Yes.  I  am  not  using  judgment,  sir,  on  that.  I 
know  it  was  a  counterrevolution.  It  was  stated  in  many  newspapers 
also  here  in  the  United  States. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  follow  the  line  of  the  international  Communist 
conspiracy  in  your  publication? 

Miss  Gyarsiaty.  I  decline  to  answer  on  this  on  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  The  two  articles  written  indicate  conclusively  she 
does. 

Mr.  Arens.  ^Vho  is  Clara  Keich? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  Clara  Keich  is  the  secretary  of  the  Xok  Vilaga, 
Inc. 

Mr.  Arens.  Tell  us  whether  or  not  to  your  certain  knowledge  Clara 
Eeich  is  a  member  of  the  Commmiist  Party. 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  I  decline  to  answer  that. 

Mr.  Arens.  Who  is  Erna  Fodor? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  I  decline  to  answer  that. 

Mr.  Arens.  Has  she  ever  been  associated  with  your  publication, 
Nok  Vilaga? 

(No  response.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Has  she  ever  been  associated  or  identified  with  your 
publication  ? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  I  decline  to  answer  that. 

Mr.  Arens.  "We  lay  before  you  now  a  statement  of  ownership 
required  by  the  postal  laws.  This  was  published  in  your  paper  in 
which  you  identify  Erna  Fodor  as  one  of  the  owners  of  the  publica- 
tion. Look  at  that  document  and  tell  us  whether  or  not  that  is  a  true 
and  correct  reproduction. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  This  was  before  the  incorporation. 

Mr.  Ahens.  Was  she  at  that  time  a  part  owner  of  your  publication  ? 

Miss  Gyakmaty.  That  is  right. 

(Document  marked  ''Gyarmaty  Exhibit  No.  3,"  and  retained  in 
committee  files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  she  is  a  Communist  ? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  I  decline  to  answer. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  been  connected  witli  the  National  Women's 
Appeal  for  the  Rights  of  Foreign  Born  Americans  ? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  I  can't  recollect  that. 

Mr.  Arens.  Tlien  I  would  like  to  lay  before  you,  if  you  please,  a 
photostatic  reproduction  of  the  Daily  Worker,  of  January  25,  1951,  in 
which  an  article  announces  that  40  noted  women  join  to  form  an  organi- 
zation known  as  the  National  Women's  Appeal  for  the  Rights  of 
Foreign  Born  Americans,  and  your  name  appears  as  one  of  those  40 
prominent  women  forming  this  organization. 

Look  at  that  document,  if  you  please,  ma'am,  and  tell  us  whether 
or  not  tliat  refreshes  your  recollection. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

]Miss  Gyarmaty.  Yes,  sir. 

(Document  marked  "Gyarmaty  Exliibit  No.  4*'  and  retained  in 
committee  files.) 


394  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

Mr.  Arens.  Look  at  the  names  of  the  other  people  who  joined  with 
you  in  the  formation  of  that  organization  and  tell  us  the  name  of  each 
person  known  by  you  to  be  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party. 

Miss  Gtarmaty.  I  decline  to  answer. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  the  National  Hungar- 
ian Bureau  of  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Miss  Gtarmaty,  I  decline  to  answer  that,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  When  were  you  last  in  Hungary  ? 

Miss  Gtarmaty.  I  decline  to  answer  that. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  respectfully  suggest  that  the  witness  be  ordered  and 
directed  to  answer  that  question. 

IMr.  Moulder.  The  witness  is  ordered  and  directed  to  answer  the 
question  and,  in  giving  that  direction  and  instruction  to  you,  it  is  not 
given  in  the  spirit  of  a  threat  but  to  ad,vise  you  of  the  possible  dangers 
of  being  in  contempt  of  Congress  for  refusal  to  answer. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Gtarmatt.  I  decline  to  answer. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you,  in  the  course  of  the  last  10  years,  been  in 
Hungary  ? 

Miss  Gtarmaty.  I  decline  to  answer  that. 

Mr,  Arens.  I  respectfully  suggest,  Mr.  Chairman,  that  the  witness 
be  ordered  and  directed  to  answer  that  question. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  committee  refuses  to  accept  your  response  to  the 
question.     You  are  directed  to  answer. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Gtarmaty.  I  still  decline. 

Mr.  Arens,  Have  you  in  the  course  of  the  last  10  years  traveled 
abroad  ? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  Yes,  sir, 

Mr.  Abens.  When? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  In  1953. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  where  did  you  go  in  1953  ? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  In  several  countries, 

Mr,  Arens,  Name  them,  please, 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Gyarmaty,  I  decline  to  answer, 

Mr.  Arens.  I  respectfully  suggest,  Mr.  Chairman,  that  the  witness 
be  ordered  and  directed  to  answer  the  question, 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  witness  is  directed  to  answer  the  question. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  I  still  decline. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  travel  on  an  American  passport? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens,  Did  you,  in  the  application  which  you  filed  with  the 
State  Department  to  procure  your  passport,  truthfully  set  forth  the 
names  of  the  countries  you  intended  to  visit  in  the  course  of  your  trip? 

Miss  Gyarmaty,  I  decline  to  answer, 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  witness  is  directed  to  answer  the  question. 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  I  still  decline, 

Mr,  Moulder,  And  for  what  reason  do  you  decline  ? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  On  the  basis  of  the  fifth  amendment.  It  might 
involve  me  in  some  incrimination. 

Mr,  Arens.  Who  paid  your  expenses  on  your  trip  ? 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGAKDA    IK    THE    UNITED    STATES  395 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  I  decline  to  answer  that.  ^  ,-: 

Mr.  Arens.  Was  it  paid  by  the  Communist  conspiracy?  -., 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  I  decline  to  answer  that. 

Mr.  Arens.  A^^io  accompanied  you  on  the  trip? 

Miss  Gyarjiaty.  Nobody. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  go  as  a  result  of  an  invitation  from  someone 
;abroad  or  from  some  group  or  organization  abroad? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  How  long  were  you  gone  on  your  trip  ? 

Mr.  SciiERER.  Pardon  just  a  moment.  Did  the  Communist  Party 
have  any  connection  with  that  trip  ? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  I  decline  to  answer. 

Mr.  SciiERER.  Did  you  visit  Russia  during  your  trip  ? 

Miss  Gy.vrmaty.  I  decline  to  answer  that. 

Mr.  SciiERER.  Did  you  have  any  conferences  with  Communist  Party 
leaders  while  you  were  in  Europe  ? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  I  decline  to  answer  that. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  a  man  by  the  name  of  John  Lautner  ? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  I  decline  to  answer  that. 

Mr.  Arens.  ^Ir.  Lautner  testified  under  oath  a  couple  of  days  ago 
before  this  connnittee  that  he  knew  you  as  a  member  of  the  Com- 
munist conspiracy.     Was  he  lying  or  telling  the  truth  ? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  I  decline  to  answer  that. 

yir.  MoiTEDER.  In  each  case  in  response  to  each  question  when  you 
say  you  decline  to  answer,  are  you  claiming  or  invoking  the  provisions 
of  the  lifth  amendment? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  Yes.     On  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Moulder.  As  to  every  question  that  has  been  asked  you  ? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Do  we  have  this  witness'  passport  application  for  her 
trip  abroad? 

Mr.  Arens.  We  do  not  have  it  with  us. 

Mr.  Scherer.  That  application  is  sworn  to  under  oath,  is  it  not? 

Mr.  Arens.  Yes,  sir.  I  think  that  is  probably  one  reason  she  in- 
voked tlie  fifth  amendment  with  refei-ence  to  the  interrogation  on  the 
passport. 

]Mr.  Scherer.  How  long  is  the  statute  of  limitations  on  perjury? 

Mr.  Arens.  It  is  5  years,  I  believe.  Were  you  the  guest  of  any 
group,  person,  or  organization  during  any  time  you  were  on  this  trip 
to  Euro])e  in  1953  ? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  I  decline  to  answer  tiiis. 

Mr.  Arens.  The  fact  is  you  were  the  guest  of  the  leading  Hungarian 
'Communist  conspiratoi'S  in  Hungary ;  vrere  you  not '( 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  I  decline,  sir,  on  this. 

Mr.  Moulder.  You  decline  to  answer  for  the  reasons  previously 
given  ? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  Yes.  .    , 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  the  International 
Workers  Order  ? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  same  basis. 

Mr.  Arens.  Tell  us  the  names  of  all  organizations  to  which  you 
•presently  belong. 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  I  can't  recollect  an}'.  ••  ,  ; ^ 

90121— 57— pt.  6 3 


396  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  belong  to  any  Hungarian  nationality  groups? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  I  can't  recollect. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  there  one  gi'oup  that  you  can  recollect  to  which  you 
presently  belong  and  meet  with '( 
(No  response.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  a  Communist  ?  Do  you  meet  with  Communists 
in  closed  party  meetings  ? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  I  decline  to  answer  that,  sir.  l^^^ienever  you  ask 
such  questions,  I  will  decline  on  the  basis  of  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Thank  you.  I  respectfully  suggest  that  will  conclude 
the  staff  interrogation  of  this  witness. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Mr.  Scherer  ? 

Mr.  Scherer.  You  indicated  in  one  of  your  articles  the  freedom 
fighters,  to  whom  you  referred  as  a  counterrevolutionary  gang,  were 
young  people ;  did  you  not  ? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  That  is  what  the  Hungarian  mothers  stated.  As 
far  as  I  know,  there  were  even  13-  and  14-year-old  children  among 
them.     The  teachers  were  taking  them  out  v»'ith  them. 

Mr.  Scherer.  And  then,  in  response  to  IVIr,  Moulder's  question,  you 
said  that  the  people  who  were  behind  this  counterrevolutionary  move- 
ment were  the  individuals  who  had  been  deprived  of  their  properties 
under  the  Communist  regime;  is  that  right  ? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Scherer.  These  young  people,  these  13-,  14-,  17-,  18-,  19-year- 
olds  whose  mothers  did  not  want  to  get  into  this  fight  and  who  were 
asking  them  to  return  home,  had  no  property  that  was  taken  away 
from  them  by  the  Communist  regime  ? 

Miss  Gyar-siaty.  I  would  not  think  so  myself.  But  they  got  in- 
volved in  it.  They  became  the  tools  of  these  people  to  whom  you 
refer. 

Mr.  Scherer.  They  became  the  tools  of  the  people  who  had  been 
deprived  of  their  farms,  their  homes,  their  factories,  when  the  Com- 
munist regime  took  over ;  is  that  right  ? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Scherer.  That  is  the  Communist  line.  That  is  the  position 
taken  by  the  Communists  today.  It  is  the  position  taken  by  Russia, 
is  it  not  ? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  That  is  your  opinion,  sir. 

Mr.  Scherer.  I  am  asking  you  if  3^ou  know  as  a  matter  of  fact,  if 
that  is  not  the  position  taken  by  the  Communists. 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  Maybe  someone  else  is  sharing  the  same  opinion 
and  so  it  does  not  make  someone  Communist  because  the  Communists 
think  the  same  line  as  you  do. 

Mr.  Scherkr.  You  praised  in  the  article  the  economic  conditions  in 
Hungary  under  the  Communist  regime  and  contrasted  those  conditions 
which  existed  in  Hungary  prior  to  the  time  that  the  Coimnunists  took 
over,  did  you  not  ? 

Miss  Gyarma'iy'.  Yes ;  I  did. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Do  you  say  here  that  the  revolt  in  Hungary  had  noth- 
ing whatsoever  to  do  with  the  austere  conditions  under  which  the 
people  were  compelled  to  live? 

IVIiss  Gyarmaty.  In  that  article,  sir,  I  have  stated  the  earning  of 
the  people  was  low. 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  397 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Under  this  economic  system  which  you  praise — the 
Communist  economic  system  which  you  praise — you  say  that  the  con- 
ditions were  not  austere.  I  am  asking  you  if  it  is  not  a  fact  that  part 
of  this  revohition  resulted  from  the  rule  of  the  austere  economic  condi- 
tions under  the  Communist  regime. 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  Sir,  I  don't  know  exactly  how  the  conditions  were 
in  October  in  Hungary.  I  know  when  I  left  Hungary  I  could  not 
buy  a  pair  of  shoes  on  my  1  month's  earning.  I  don't  think  it  was  as 
bad  in  the  Communist  regime,  as  you  call  it,  as  it  was  at  that  time  when 
I  left  Hungary. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  How  long  ago  was  it  that  you  left  Hungary  ? 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  I  left  in  1922. 

Mr.  ScHERFJR.  We  who  came  up  during  the  depression  as  young  men 
had  a  pretty  bad  situation  in  this  country,  too. 

Miss  Gyarmaty.  Yes.     I  enjoyed  it,  too. 

Mr.  Scherer.  That  is  all. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  witness  is  excused,  and  you  may  claim  your  at- 
tendance fees  with  the  clerk  of  the  committee. 

(Witness  excused.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Alex  Rosner,  please  come  forward. 

Mr.  ISIoulder.  Do  you  solemnly  swear  the  testimony  which  you  are 
about  to  give  before  the  committee  will  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth, 
and  nothing  but  the  truth,  so  help  you  God  ? 

Mr.  RosNER.  Yes,  sir. 

TESTIMONY  OF  ALEX  EOSNES,  ACCOMPANIED  BY  COUNSEL, 
ABRAHAM  UNGER 

Mr.  Arens.  Kindly  identify  yourself  by  name,  residence,  and  occu- 
pation. 

Mr.  RosNER.  Alex  Rosner,  150  West  80th  Street,  linotype  operator 
by  occupation  and  manager  of  the  Hungarian  Word. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  appearing  today  in  response  to  a  subpena 
which  was  served  upon  you  by  the  House  Committee  on  Un-American 
Activities  ? 

Mr.  Rosner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  represented  by  counsel  ? 

Mr.  Rosner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  Counsel,  kindly  identify  yourself. 

Mr.  Unger.  Abraham  Unger,  320  Broadway,  N"ew  York  City. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  and  wlien  were  you  born  ? 

Mr.  Rosner.  I  was  born  in  the  free  city  of  Pida,  which  was  under 
the  ])rotectorate  of  Hungary.  Then  it  became  Italian,  and  presently 
is  part  of  Yugoslavia. 

Mr.  Arens.  When  were  you  born  ? 

Mr.  Rosner.  I  was  born  on  March  17,  1912. 

Mr.  Arens.  When  did  you  come  to  the  United  States  for  permanent 
residence  ? 

Mr.  Rosner.  I  came  to  the  United  States  in  1929. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  a  citizen  ? 

Mr.  Rosner.  I  am  a  citizen. 

Mr.  Arens.  By  derivation  or  naturalization  ? 

Mr.  Rosner.  By  derivation.     That  means  my  father  was  a  citizen. 


398  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

]Mr,  Arkns.  How  long  have  you  been  business  manager  of  the  Hun- 
garian Word  ? 

Mr.  RosNER.  Since  its  organization. 

Mr.  Arens.  "\^^len  was  that? 

Mr.  RosxER.  1053  or  1054.     I  don't  know  exactly. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  was  your  employment  immediately  prior  to  your 
assum]ition  of  office  as  business  manager  of  the  Hungarian  Word? 

Mr.  Rosner.  I  was  the  business  manager  of  the  Hungarian  Daily 
Journal. 

Mr.  Arens.  How  long  were  you  business  manager  of  the  Hungarian 
Daily  Journal  ? 

Mr.  RosNER.  Some  time  in  1048. 

Mr.  Arens.  The  Hungarian  Word  is  the  successor  publication  to 
Hungarian  Daily  Journal ;  is  it  not  ? 

Mr.  Rosner.  Yes,  sir.  I  don't  know  about  the  law,  but  it  is  the 
successor. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Zoltan  Deak  is  identified  with  your  publication;  is 
he  not  ? 

Mr.  Rosner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  As  business  manager  of  the  Hungarian  Word,  could 
you  tell  us  what  funds  have  been  received  by  your  publication  from 
the  International  Workers  Order  ? 

Mr.  Rosner.  I  don't  think  the  Hungarian  Word  received  any  money 
from 

Mr.  Arens.  The  predecessor  organization. 

Mr.  R<  iSNER.  The  Hungarian  Daily  Journal  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Yes. 

Mr.  Rosner.  I  think  the  Hungarian  Daily  Journal  carried  publicity 
for  the  IWO  and  was  paid  for  it.     How  much  it  is  I  don't  know. 

Mr,  Arens.  AYliat  sources  of  revenue  has  the  Hungarian  Word  at 
the  present  time,  other  than  its  revenue  from  subscriptions  and  adver- 
tisements ? 

Mr.  Rosner.  From  fund-raising  social  affairs  and  collections. 

Mr.  Arens.  Does  it  receive  funds  from  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Rosner.  The  Hungarian  Word  does  not  receive  funds  from  the 
Communist  Party,  or  from  any  party,  for  that  matter. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  it  controlled  by  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Rosner.  It  is  not  controlled  by  anybody. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  a  Communist  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Rosner.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  would  like  you  to  hear 
my  reasons — or  some  of  the  reasons — for  which  I  want  to  decline  to 
answer  this  question.  I  know  that  there  are  laws  in  this  country 
which  I  publicly  opposed,  which  makes  it  criminal  to  be  a  member  of 
this  particular  political  party. 

Mr.  SciiERER.  There  is  no  law  such  as  that. 

Mr.  Rosner.  As  a  layman,  this  is  my  understanding.  I  know  that 
I  could  get  incriminated  if  I  would  answer  a  cjuestion  of  this  kind. 

Mr.  Sciierer.  No  ;  if  you  teach  and  advocate  the  overthrow  of  this 
Government  by  force  and  violence,  actively,  then  you  can  be  prose- 
cuted under  one  of  those  laws.  But  mere  membership  is  not  a  viola- 
tion of  law\ 

Mr.  Rosner.  From  what  I  have  seen  before,  people  who  have  been 
accused  of  being  Communists  have  been  prosecuted.     Certainly  I  don't 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IX    THE    UNITED    STATES  399 

have  neither  the  funds  to  defend  myself  nor  the  wish  to  be  dragged 
through  the  courts.  Because  of  this,  in  view  of  the  fact  that  1  don't 
want  to  be  incriminated,  my  answer  must  be  that  I  denj'  this  question 
under  my  rights  under  tlie  tifth  amendment. 

^Nlr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  John  Lautner  i 

Mr.  KosNER.  I  understand 

Mr.  ^Moulder.  May  I  ask  you  this :  If  under  the  Tnununity  Act  you 
were  promised  and  assured  of  immunity  from  criminal  prosecution, 
would  you  answer  the  (piestion  ( 

Mr.  Kosxer.  Mr.  Chairman,  at  tliis  time  I  am  not  ready  to  answer 
an}'  questions  in  this  category. 

Mr.  Arexs,  Do  you  know  John  Lautner^ 

Mr.  Rosner.  I  refuse  to  answer  tliis  (juestion  under  the  same 
grounds. 

Mr.  Arens.  He  testified  the  other  day  before  this  connnittee  that 
while  he  was  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  he  knew  you  as  a 
Conununist.     Was  he  lying  or  was  he  telling  the  truth  ? 

Mr.  Rosner.  I  respectfully  decline  to  answer  this  question,  sir. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Did  you  ever  live  in  Cleveland,  Ohio  ? 

Mr.  Rosxer.  Yes ;  I  lived  in  Cleveland,  Ohio. 

Mr.  Arexs.  When  did  vou  live  in  Cleveland,  Ohio? 

Mr.  Rosxer.  WM  or  10:>2  or  ld?,-?>.     I  don't  know  exactly. 

Mr.  Arexs.  What  training  did  you  receive  in  Cleveland,  Ohio,  in 
(he  early  thirties? 

Mr.  Rosxer.  What  training? 

Mr.  Arex^s.  Yes.  Did  you  attend  any  training  school  in  Cleveland, 
Ohio,  in  the  early  thirties? 

Mr.  Rosx^ER.  I  was  an  apprentice  printer  in  a  publication,  if  you 
are  interested  in  that. 

Mr.  Arex'^s.  Just  rack  your  brain  a  moment  and  tell  us  whether  or 
not  you  recall  any  training  school  that  you  attended  in  Cleveland, 
Ohio,  in  the  early  thirties? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Rosxer.  I  respectfidly  decline  to  answer  this  cpiestion. 

Mr.  Arexs.  I  put  it  to  you  as  a  fact,  and  ask  you  to  affirm  or  deny 
the  fact,  that  while  you  were  in  Cleveland,  Ohio,  in  the  earl}'  thirties 
you  were  one  of  the  top  echelon  being  trained  in  secret  underground 
o])erations  in  the  National  Hungarian  Training  School.  If  that  is 
not  true,  deny  it  while  you  are  under  oath. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Arexs.  Were  you  trained  in  the  National  Hungarian  Training 
School  in  Cleveland,  Ohio,  in  1032  by  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Rosxer.  Again  I  decline  to  answer  the  question,  sir. 

Mr.  Moulder.  In  your  refusal  to  answer,  as  I  understand  it,  3'ou  are 
invoking  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Rosxer.  Yes.  sir. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  the  International 
Workers  Order  ? 

Mr.  Rosxer.  Yes;  I  have  been  a  member  of  tlie  International 
Workers  Order. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Over  what  period  of  time  ? 

Mr.  Rosxer.  Quite  a  feAV  years,  I  imagine. 

Mr.  Arexs.  You  were  active  in  the  IWO  up  until  15)54;  were  you 
not? 


400  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

Mr.  RosNER.  You  said  what? 

Mr.  ^Vrens.  You  were  an  active  member  of  tlie  International 
Workers  Order  until  1954? 

Mr.  RosNER.  I  was  a  member  of  the  IWO.  I  was  never  active  in 
the  IWO. 

]Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  presently  belong  to  any  Hungarian  nationality 
group  ? 

Mr.  RosNER.  Except  those  connected  with  my  newspaper, 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  belong  to  any  Hungarian  nationality  club? 

Mr.  RosNER.  No ;  I  don't  belong  to  any  nationality  club. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  would  con- 
clude the  staff  interrogation  of  this  witness. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Mr.  Scherer  ? 

Mr.  Scherer.  What  I  have  heard  here,  and  if  I  am  incorrect  so 
advise  me,  Witness ;  everyone  connected  with  this  newspaper  of  yours, 
in  an  official  capacity  at  least,  is  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party. 

Mr.  RosNER.  I  didn't  understand  the  question,  sir. 

Mr.  Scherer.  I  say,  from  the  evidence  that  I  have  heard  here,  every- 
one connected  with  your  newspaper  in  an  official  capacity  is  a  member 
of  the  Communist  Party.  If  that  statement  is  incorrect,  would  you 
so  advise. 

Mr.  RosNER.  I  don't  think  I  am  competent  to  tell  you  who  and  how 
or  what  is,  because,  perhaps,  I  don't  Imow  or  perhaps  I  would  not 
want  to  incriminate  myself  under  the  fifth  amendment,  sir. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Do  you  know  of  anyone  with  your  paper  who  is  not 
a  Communist? 

Mr.  Rosner.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question,  sir. 

Mr.  Moulder.  For  what  reason? 

Mr.  RosNER.  The  fifth  amendment,  sir. 

Mr.  Scherer.  I  have  no  further  questions. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Do  you  have  any  information  or  knowledge  of  any 
activity  on  the  part  of  the  Communist  Party  to  contact  or  solicit  mem- 
bership from  the  refugees — the  so-called  refugees — who  have  been 
recently  coming  into  this  country  from  Hungary? 

Mr.  Rosner.  No;  I  don't  haVe  any  knowledge  of  that  kind,  sir. 
I  did  have  refugees  come  up  to  my  newspaper  to  talk  to  me,  which 
has  nothing  to  do  with  the  Communist  Party.  That  is  the  only  knowl- 
edge I  have  of  the  refugees  that  are  over  here  at  this  time. 

Mr.  Scherer.  You  say,  which  had  nothing  to  do  with  the  Com- 
munist Party.  Didn't  any  of  them  complain  about  the  Communist 
atrocities  ? 

Mr.  RosNER.  Who;  the  refugees? 

Mr.  Scherer.  The  people  who  came  to  see  you. 

Mr.  Rosner.  No.  Some  of  them  told  me  that  they  would  eat 
potatoes  and  bread  as  long  as  they  could  go  back.  They  were  having 
an  awful  hard  time  to  get  back  over  there.  If  you  wish,  I  can  furnish 
you  those  names. 

Mr.  Moulder.  They  wanted  to  go  back  ? 

Mr.  Rosner.  Yes. 

Mr,  Arens.  Do  you  recall  their  names  at  the  moment  ? 

Mr.  Rosner,  Yes.  One  was  a  man  by  the  name  of  Nemeth,  who  at 
that  time  gave  me  his  address. 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  401 

Mr.  Moulder.  How  do  you  spell  his  name  ? 

Mr.  KosNER.  N-e-m-e-t-h. 

Mr.  Arens.  He  wanted  to  go  back  to  Hungary  ? 

Mr.  EosNER.  Yes.  He  claimed  that  he  was  being  given  the  run- 
aromid  and  tliat  he  didn't  know  where  to  go.  I  also  tried  to  convince 
hmi,  and  told  him  that  he  is  not  a  judge  of  American  life.  That 
America  is  a  nice  country,  and  that  I  was  lonesome,  too,  when  I  came 
to  this  country,  and  I  began  to  love  this  country.  But  he  insisted 
that  he  wanted  to  go  back  and  that  he  didn't  know  where  to  go. 

Mr.  SciiERER.  ^Vliy  did  this  particular  individual  tell  you  that  he 
left  Hungary  ? 

Mr.  EosNER.  Nemeth  ?  There  were  a  number  of  people  who  told  me 
that  they  wanted  to  go  back  to  Plungary. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Let  us  talk  about  the  one  you  are  talking  about.  That 
certainly  entered  into  your  discussion. 

Mr.  EosNER.  I  certainly  want  to  tell  you.  He  told  me  that  during 
the  uprising  he  participated  as  a  member  of  the  Workers'  Council ;  and, 
when  the  events  of  November  4  began,  he  got  scared  since  he  belonged 
to  the  "Workers'  Council.  He  claimed  that  he  has  never  committed  any 
criminal  act,  and  he  got  scared  and  he  left  the  country.  He  left  the 
country,  and  he  answered  his  son  and  got  to  Austria,  and  then  he  was 
taken  over  here. 

Mr.  Arens.  Was  he  a  Communist?     Did  he  tell  you? 

Mr.  EosNER.  He  did  not  tell  me  he  was  a  Communist  or  not. 
Mr.  ScHERER.  Was  the  Workers'  Council  Communist  ? 

^Ir.  EosxER.  From  what  I  read  in  the  newspaper  the  Workers' 
Councils  were  formed  by  the  workers  in  the  various  factorie-s  and  in 
the  various  industries.  From  what  I  read  today  in  the  newspaper, 
the  Workers'  Councils  are  the  so-called  owners  of  these  industries  in 
Hungary.  The  Workers'  Council  is  the  legal  owner.  This  is  my  un- 
derstanding. I  would  not  swear  to  it,  because  I  don't  know.  They 
are  supposed  to  be  owners  of  a  particular  factory. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Wlien  the  anti-Communists  started  to  revolt  in  Hun- 
gary, was  he  one  of  those  who  got  scared  and  left  because  he  was  afraid 
of  being  designated  as  a  Communist?  Was  he  one  of  the  first  group 
that  left? 

]Mr.  EosNER,  He  said  that  he  left  after  the  November  events ;  that  is, 
after  the  intervention  of  the  Eussian  Army. 

Mr,  ScHERER.  He  didn't  participate  in  the  uprising  against  the  Com- 
munist regime ;  did  he  ? 

Mr.  BosxER.  Apparently  the  Workers'  Council  must  have,  because 
he  claims  that  that  is  why  he  was  afraid,  that  he  participated  in  the 
Workers'  Council.  He  got  over  here,  and  he  was  sorry  to  have  left 
and  he  wants  to  go  back.  In  his  statement  which  we  published  in  our 
paper,  he  stated  that  he  would  rather  eat  potatoes  and  bread  to  be  back 
in  the  country  where  he  was  born.  If  you  want  to,  I  will  give  you 
some  more  names  of  people  who  want  to  go  back  to  Hungary.  I  think 
it  may  be  of  interest  to  you  to  look  into  this  aifair.  I  don't  know.  A 
man  by  the  name  of  Mate. 

Mr.  Arens.  AMiere  does  he  live? 

]Mr.  EosNER.  Also  living  on  23d  Street  and  Tth  Avenue,  There  is  a 
hotel  there.  That  is  what  he  told  me.  He  lives  at  the  Chelsea  Hotel. 
He  went  innumerable  times  up  to  the  World  Church  Council,  or  what- 
ever the  organization  name  is. 


402  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

And  they  were  oiving-  him  the  runaround,  and  the}-  would  not  lielp 
him  to  get  back  to  his  country.  His  statement  about  leaving  Hungary 
was  as  follows:  He  left  Hungary  because  his  son  who  went  to  the 
university  in  Budapest,  when  the  uprising  took  place — he  went  to 
Budapest  to  see  his  son.  being  a  student — and  when  he  went  to  the 
house  where  his  boy  was  living,  he  found  the  house  destroyed  and  some 
peo])le  that  he  contacted  had  told  him  that  his  son  ran  to  Vienna.  So 
he  followed  his  son  to  Vienna.  In  Vienna  he  looked  at  the  list  of 
names  and  he  found  one  name  that  was  similar  to  his  son's.  Because 
of  that  he  inquired  and  tried  to  tind  where  this  name  was.  He  found 
himself  with  information  that  his  son  was  here  in  the  United  States. 
So  he  pleaded  with  the  authorities  that  he  wanted  to  go  after  his  son 
and  reach  his  son.  He  came  to  the  United  States,  and  in  Camp  Kilmer 
he  found  that  tlie  man  by  the  name  of  JMate  was  not  the  same  boy. 
When  he  detei'mined  the  fact  that  this  lioy  was  not  his  son,  he  wanted 
to  go  back  Init  they  tried  to  convince  him  to  go  to  work.  He  is  con- 
struction engineer,  or  something  of  that  kind.  When  he  went  for 
employment  he  was  told — he  is  47  years  old — to  dye  his  hair  if  he 
wants  to  get  a  job  at  that  age  in  this  particular  industry.  He  said 
that  he  was  disillusioned  and  disgusted  and  he  wanted  to  go  back. 
I  told  him  to  go  to  the  authorities,  if  he  wants  to  go  back,  and  ask  the 
authorities  to  do  something  for  him  or  to  do  whatever  they  see  fit  to  do. 

There  were  other  peo])le  who  similarly  came  with  their  complaints 
to  our  newspaper  that  they  wanted  to  go  back  to  Hungary.  I  am  try- 
ing to  recall  at  this  moment  the  name.  They  also  live  in  the  Chelsea 
Hotel.  They  asked  me  since  they  did  not  speak  Hungarian  whether 
I  was  willing  to  go  and  interpret  for  them. 

Mr.  UxGER.  You  mean  do  not  speak  English  ? 

Mr.  EosNER.  Yes,  did  not  speak  English — if  I  was  willing  to  inter- 
pret for  them,  which  I  did.  I  went  up  to  the  World  Council  of 
Churches.  I  found  that  they  did  not  need  an  interpreter  because  there 
were  people  wlio  wei-e  competently  speaking  Hungarian.  Then  in 
questioning  them  as  to  why  they  wanted  me  to  come  with  them,  they 
said  that  they  did  not  know  wliether  this  i^erson  was  sincere  or  whether 
he  sincerely  translated  what  was  told  to  them  by  whatever  authorities 
there  may  have  been.  This  was  the  story,  some  of  which  I  think  we 
published.  I  am  not  sure.  We  published  something  to  that  effect, 
anyway. 

]\Ir.  Arexs.  You  know  there  is  a  Communist  regime  in  Hungary 
now,  do  you  not  ? 

Mr,  RosxER.  I  know  that  the  members  of  the  Hungarian  Govern- 
ment, the  Hungarian  regime,  are  members  of  the  Hungarian  Workers 
Socialist  Party  and  commonly.  I  guess,  they  say  it  is  a  Communist 
regime. 

]Mr.  Arexs.  Do  you  want  a  Communist  regime  in  the  United  States? 

Mr.  RosNER.  I  am  very,  very  satisfied  with  our  Constitution. 

Mr.  Arens.  Wliy  don't  you  then  break  from  the  Communist  Party 
and  testify  before  this  committee  so  that  we  can  help  protect  the 
Constitution  of  the  United  States  and  protect  this  Nation  against 
the  international  Communist  conspiracy? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  403 

Mr.  RosNER,  Mr.  Chairman,  I  have  been  talking-  over  here  and 
testifying  and,  as  1  said  before,  I  am  not  ready  to  be  victimized  for 
the  thinjrs  that  I  may  be  believing  now  or  for  the  things  that  I  may 
have  believed  2  days  ago  or  20  years  ago.  So  I  am  not  going  to  allow 
that  I  should  be  in  any  way  incriminated,  whether  justly  or  unjustly. 

Mr.  Arens.  That  would  conclude  the  staff  interrogation. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Do  you  tliink,  or  do  you  })elieve,  there  are  a  sufficient 
number  of  Hungarian  refugees  in  this  country  desiring  to  return  to 
justify  our  Government  setting  up  some  sort  of  project  or  commission 
to  hear  those  people  and  provide  transportation  back  to  Hungary  'I 

Mr.  RosNER.  Mr.  Chairman,  if  you  want  my  opinion,  when  you 
talk  about  providing  them  with  transportation  back  to  their  country 
or  wherever  it  may  be,  it  means  that  you  and  I  will  have  to  stand  the 
expenses.  It  will  reflect  itself  in  our  taxes.  So  I  don't  know  exactly 
what  I  would  suggest  in  this  connection.  I  would  say  this :  According 
to  JMr.  Walter  there  are  about  7,000  Communists — I  am  quoting  Mr. 
Walter,  who  is  the  chairman  of  your  connnittee — and  I  would  say 
not  whether  they  are  Communists  or  not,  it  is  not  my  business,  but 
tliere  are  people  who  are  not  satisfied  with  the  conditions  or  the  form 
of  government  that  we  have,  that  they  probably  have  no  place  in  this 
counti-y. 

INIr.  ScHERER.  You  mean  they  have  complained  to  you  about  being 
dissatisfied  with  the  form  of  our  Government? 

Mr.  RosNER.  I  quoted  Mr.  Walter,  sir. 

Mr.  SciiERER.  I  thought  you  said  that. 

Mr.  Moulder.  He  said  if  they  were  not  satisfied. 

Mr.  RosNER.  If  they  were  not  satisfied  and  wanted  to  go  back  to  the 
country  where  they  came  from,  I  don't  see  why  anybody  would  want 
to  force  them  to  stay  over  here. 

Mr.  Moulder.  For  lack  of  transportation  or  means  of  getting  back  ? 

Mr.  RosNER.  I  don't  know.  Let  them  work  or  let  the  Government 
take  one  ship.  We  spend  a  lot  of  money  on  a  lot  of  things.  Maybe 
we  could  put  a  ship  at  their  disposal  if  they  want  to  go  back. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  committee  will  stand  in  recess  until  2  o'clock. 

(Whereupon,  at  12 :  30  p.  m.  the  committee  was  recessed,  to  recon- 
vene at  2  p.  m.  the  same  da}'.) 

AFTERNOON  SESSION— THURSDAY,  MARCH  14,  1957 

(Committee  members  present:  Representatives  Moulder  and 
Scherer.) 

]\Ir.  Moulder.  The  committee  will  be  in  order. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Louis  Battler,  please  come  forward. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  you  are 
about  to  give  will  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and  nothing  but  the 
truth,  so  help  you  God  ? 

Mr.  Dattler.  I  do. 

TESTIMONY  OF  LOUIS  DATTLEE,  ACCOMPANIED  BY  COUNSEL, 
ABRAHAM  UNGER 

Mr.  Arens.  Kindly  identify  yourself  by  name,  residence,  and  oc- 
'Cupation. 


404  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

]Mr.  Dattler.  Louis  Dattler,  2229  Throgneck  Boulevard,  the 
Bronx. 

Mr.  Arexs.  You  are  appearing  in  response  to  a  subpena  by  the 
House  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities  ? 

Mr.  Dattler.  That  is  right. 

Mr,  Arens.  You  are  represented  by  counsel  ? 

Mr.  Dattler.  Yes,  sir.  Abraham  Unger,  320  Broadway,  New  York 
City. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Wliere  and  when  were  you  bom  ? 

Mr,  Dattler.  In  1904  in  Hungary. 

Mr.  Arexs.  When  did  you  come  to  the  United  States  for  perma- 
nent residence? 

Mr.  Dattler.  1931. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  a  citizen  of  the  United  States  ? 

Mr.  Dattler.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Did  you  obtain  your  citizenship  by  derivation  or  natu- 
ralization ? 

Mr.  Dattler.  Naturalization. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Where  were  you  naturalized  ? 

Mr.  Dattler.  In  New  York  southern  district  court  in  1945, 1  guess. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Have  you  been  known  by  any  name  other  than  Ix)uis 
Dattler? 

Mr.  Dattler.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Were  you  a  Communist  at  the  time  you  were  naturalized 
a  citizen  of  the  United  States  ? 

Mr.  DATrLER.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  basis  of  the  fifth  amend- 
ment. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Are  you  presently  a  Coirmiunist  ? 

Mr.  Dattler.  I  decline  to  answer. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Do  you  know  a  man  bj^  the  name  of  Jolm  Lautner  ? 

Mr.  Dattler.  I  decline  to  answer. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Mr.  Lautner  identified  you  2  days  ago  before  this  com- 
mitte  inider  oath  as  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party.  Was  he  lying 
or  telling  the  truth? 

Mr.  Dx\ttler.  I  decline  on  the  same  basis. 

Mr.  Arex's.  Are  you  employed  ? 

Mr.  Dattler.  I  am  unemployed  right  now. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Where  were  you  last  employed? 

Mr.  Dattler.  I  was  working  with  the  painting  industr3^ 

Mr.  Arex^s.  Have  you  ever  been  identified  with  the  Hungarian 
Word  ? 

Mr.  Moulder.  A  newspaper. 

(The  witness  consulted  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Dattler.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arex^s.  In  what  capacity  ? 

Mr.  Dattler.  Secretary. 

Air.  Arexs.  When  were  you  secretary  of  the  Hungarian  Word  ? 

Mr.  Dattler.  In  1956,  October,  I  guess  it  is. 

Mr.  Arexs.  I  beg  your  pardon  ? 

Mr.  Dattler.  Since  1956,  October. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Until  when  ? 

Mr.  Dattler.  Until  recent  days.     I  mean  right  now. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Are  you  presently  secretary  of  the  Hungarian  Word  ? 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  405 

Mr.  Dattler.  That's  right. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  receive  compensation  for  your  service  as  sec- 
retary ? 

Mr.  Dattler.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  is  the  Hungarian  Word  ? 

Mr.  Dattler.  It  is  a  newspaper  publication. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  it  controlled  by  the  Communist  Party  ? 

(The  witness  consulted  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Dattler.  It  isn't. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  the  editor  a  Communist? 

Mr.  Dattler.  I  decline  to  answer  that. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  Zoltan  Deak? 

Mr.  Dattler.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  he  a  Communist? 

Mr.  Dattler.  I  decline  to  answer  that. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  ever  a  member  of  the  Hungarian  IWO 
Center  m  the  Bronx  ? 

Mr.  Dattler.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  Over  what  period  of  time  were  you  a  member  of  that 
organization  ( 

Mr.  Dattler.  About  10  years. 

Mr.  Arens.  Beginning  when  and  ending  when,  please? 

Mr.  Dattler.  I  think  since  1945. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  presently  belong  to  any  nationality  group,  club, 
or  organization? 

Mr.  Dattler.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  AYhat  is  the  name  of  the  organization  ? 

Mr.  Dattler.  It  is  a  small  Hungarian  society. 

Mr.  Arens.  Wliat  is  the  name  of  it? 

Mr.  Datixer.  In  English  it  doesn't  come  out  right.  Hungarian 
Social  Club. 

Mr.  Arens.  ^\^io  is  president  of  it? 

Mr.  Dattler.  I  decline  to  answer  that. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  president  of  it  ? 

Mr.  Dattler.  I  decline  to  answer  that. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  respectfully  suggest,  Mr.  Chairman,  the  witness  be 
ordered  and  directed  to  answer  that  question. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  witness  is  directed  to  answer  the  question. 

(The  witness  consulted  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Dattt.er.  I  decline  to  answer. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  that  club  a  gi'oup  which  is  the  successor  to  the  Com- 
munist fraction  within  the  IWO  of  Hungarian  nationals? 

Mr.  Dattler.  I  decline  to  answer  that. 

Mr.  Arens.  ^Vliat  are  your  duties  as  secretary  of  the  Hungarian 
Word? 

Mr.  Datti.er.  I  am  signing  checks. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  is  the  annual  income  of  Hungarian  Word  ? 

Mr.  Moulder.  You  mean  gross  income  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Yes. 

Mr.  Dattler.  It  is  between  $40,000  and  $50,000. 

Mr.  Arens.  Who  is  Alex  Rosner  ? 

Mr.  Dattler.  He  is  the  manager  of  the  paper. 


406  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

Mr.  Aeens.  Is  he  a  Communist? 

Mr.  Dattler.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question. 

Mr.  Arens.  Who  is  Arpad  Nagy  ? 

Mr.  Dattler.  In  what  respect,  who  is  he? 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  him  ? 

Mr.  Dattler.  I  know  him. 

Mr.  Arens.  Does  he  have  any  connection  with  Hungarian  Word? 

Mr.  Dattler.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  he  a  Communist? 

Mr.  Dattler.  I  decline  to  answer. 

]Mr.  Arens.  What  is  his  connection  with  Hungarian  Word? 

Mr.  Dattler.  He  is  treasurer. 

Mr.  Arens.  Who  is  Hugo  Gellert? 

Mr.  Dattler.  He  is  the  president  of  the  organization. 
.    Mr.  Arens.  Is  he  a  Communist? 

Mr.  Daitler.  I  decline  to  answer. 

Mr.  Arens.  Wliat  is  the  name  of  the  predecessor  to  Hungarian 
Word? 

Mr.  Dattler.  It  is  a  Hungarian  name. 

Mr.  Arens.  How  do  you  spell  that  in  Hungarian  ? 

Mr.  Dattler.  Unless  I  write  it  down,  I  can't  spell  it.  I  am  veiy 
bad  on  spelling.    In  Hungarian? 

Mr.  Arens.  Yes.  Is  that  Magyar,  first  name,  Jovo,  last  name;  is 
that  what  it  is  ? 

Mr.  Dattler.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Does  the  Hungarian  Word  receive  financial  support 
from  the  Communist  Party? 

Mr.  Dattler.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  it  receive  financial  support  or  did  its  predecessor 
receive  financial  support  from  the  IWO? 

Mr.  Dattler.  I  wouldn't  know  nothing  about  that. 

Mr.  Arens.  Does  it  follow  tlie  Communist  Party  line  ? 

(The  witness  consulted  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Dattler.  I  don't  think  so. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  respectfully  suggest,  Mr.  Chairman,  that  concludes 
the  staff  interrogation  of  this  witness. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Are  there  any  questions,  Mr.  Scherer? 

Mr.  Scpierer.  No. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  witness  is  excused. 

(Witness  excused.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Arpad  F.  Nagy. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  you  are 
about  to  give  will  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and  nothing  but  the 
truth,  so  help  you  God? 

Mr.  Naoy.  i  do. 

TESTIMONY  OF  ARPAD  FODOR  NAGY,  ACCOMPANIED  BY  COUNSEL, 

ABRAHAM  UNGER 

Mr.  Arens.  Kindly  identify  yourself  by  name,  residence,  and 
occupation. 

Mr.  Nagy.  Arpad  Fodor  Nagy. 

Mr.  Arens.  Spell  your  name  for  the  reporter,  please. 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  407 

Mr.  Nagy.  A-r-p-a-d  F-o-d-o-r  N-a-g-y. 

Mr.  Arens.  Your  residence  and  occupation  ? 

Mr.  Nagy.  165  Higliwood,  Weehawken,  N.  J. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  your  occupation? 

Mr.  Nagy.  Dental  technician. 

Mr.  Arexs.  You  are  appearing  today  in  response  to  a  subpena 
wliich  was  served  upon  you  by  the  House  Committee  on  Un-American 
Activities? 

Mr.  Nagy.  That's  correct. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  you  are  represented  by  counsel  ? 

Mr.  Nagy.  Yes. 

Mr.  Unger.  Abraham  linger,  320  Broadway,  New  York  City. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  are  you  employed  as  a  dental  technician  ? 

Mr.  Nagy.  I  have  a  dental  laboratory. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where? 

Mr.  Nagy.  110  West  42d  Street,  New  York. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  the  name  ? 

Mr.  Nagy.  Master  Touch  Dental  Laboratory. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  were  you  born  ? 

Mr.  Nagy.  December  13, 1916,  St.  Paul,  Minn. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  connected  with  the  Hungarian  Word? 

Mr.  Nagy.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  In  what  capacity  ? 

Mr.  Nagy.  I  am  treasurer. 

Mr.  Arens.  Plow  long  have  you  been  treasurer  of  Hungarian  Word  ? 

Mr.  Nagy.  About  a  year,  I  assume. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  treasurer  of  the  predecessor  publication  ? 

Mr.  Nagy.  No. 

Mr.  Arens.  As  treasurer  of  the  Hungarian  Word,  could  you  give  us 
an  indication  of  the  income  of  Hungarian  AVord?    Its  gross  income? 

Mr.  Nagy.  Subscriptions  readers'  contrilnitions,  advertisements. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  is  the  aggregate  amount? 

Mr.  Nagy.  What  is  the  amount  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Yes. 

Mr.  Nagy.  The  yearly  income? 

Mr.  Arens.  Yes,  please,  an  approximation. 

Mr.  Nagy.  Between  $40,000  and  $50,000. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  percentage  of  that  comes  ^'rom  subscriptions  and 
what  from  advertisers  and  what  percentage  from  any  other  source? 

Mr.  Nagy.  I  believe  about  70  percent  of  subscription,  and  adver- 
tisers and  the  remaining  amount  is  contributions,  fund  raising  by 
the  I'eaders. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  is  the  circulation  of  Hungarian  Word? 

Mr.  Nagy.  I  believe  about  3,500. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  a  Communist  ? 

Mr.  Nagy.  I  decline  to  answer  on  this  question. 

Mr.  Arens.  AMiy? 

Mr.  Moulder.  State  your  reasons. 

Mr.  Nagy.  It  might  incriminate  me  and  I  take  tlio  fifth  amendment 
to  protect  myself. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  a  man  by  tlie  name  of  John  Lautner  ? 

Mr.  Nagy.  I  decline  to  answer  for  the  same  reason. 

Mr.  Arens.  Two  days  ago  Mr.  Lautner  took  an  oath  before  this 
committee  and  identified  you  as  a  person  known  by  him  to  have  been 


408  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

a  member  of  the  Communist  Party.  Was  lie  lying  or  telling  the 
truth? 

Mr.  Nagy.  He  has  the  right  to  say  whatever  he  pleases.  I  decline 
to  answer  that  question. 

Mr.  Akens.  Were  you  a  member  of  the  Hungarian  National  Bu- 
reau of  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Nagy.  I  decline  to  answer  on  that  question. 

Mr.  Akens.  Have  you  ever  registered  under  the  Foreign  Agents 
Eegistration  Act  ? 

Mr.  Nagy.  Pardon  me? 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  registered  under  the  Foreign  Agents 
Registration  Act  ? 

Mr.  Nagy.  No. 

Mr.  Arens.  Has  the  Hungarian  Word  or  any  of  its  officers,  to  your 
knowledge,  ever  registered  under  the  Foreign  Agents  Registration 
Act? 

Mr.  Nagy.  I  don't  know  anything  about  it. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  the  International 
Workers  Order  ? 

Mr.  Nagy.  I  decline  to  answer  on  that  question. 

Mr.  Arens.  Wliy? 

Mr.  Nagy.  I  believe  I  heard  here  this  morning  that  the  organiza- 
tion was  dissolved  and  that  it  has  no  connection  whatsoever  for  the 
individual  who  was  a  member  or  not  a  member. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  respectfully  suggest  that  the  witness  be  ordered  and 
directed  to  answer  that  question. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Your  reasons  stated  are  insufficient.  The  com- 
mittee rejects  your  reasons,  and  you  are  instructed  and  directed  to 
answer  the  question. 

Mr.  Nagy.  I  refuse  to  answer  on  that  because  it  might  incriminate 
me. 

Mr.  Moulder.  As  I  understand,  you  intend  to  invoke  the  provisions 
of  the  fifth  amendment  ? 

Mr.  Nagy.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  belong  to  any  group  or  organization  of  Hun- 
garian nationals  ? 

Mr.  Nagy.  No. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  belong  to  the  club  that  the  gentleman,  Mr. 
Dattler,  who  preceded  you  on  the  witness  stand,  was  speaking  about? 
Do  you  and  Mr.  Dattler  belong  to  the  same  club  ? 

Mr.  Nagy.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  respectfully  suggest,  Mr.  Chairman,  that  concludes 
the  staff  interrogation  of  this  witness. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Any  questions,  Mr.  Scherer? 

Mr.  Scherer.  Does  the  Hungarian  Word  receive  any  literature, 
pamphlets,  or  newspapers  from  any  country  behind  the  Iron  Curtain  ? 

Mr.  Nagy.  Not  to  my  knowledge. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Is  there  a  bookshop  connected  with  your  printing 
plant  ? 

Mr.  Nagy.  It  is  not  a  bookshop.  It  has  some  books  available  for 
the  readers  to  buy. 

Mr.  Scherer,  You  mean  readers  of  the  Hungarian  Word? 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  409 

Mr.  Nagy.  For  that  matter,  everybody  else  who  wants  to  buy  books 
which  have  some  advertisement  in  the  paper,  naming  these  books  which 
are  available  to  whoever  wants  to  read  Hungarian  books. 

jVIr.  ScHERER.  Are  they  all  books  or  are  there  some  newspapers, 
pamphlets  or  other  material? 

Mr.  Nagy.  No,  those  mostly  are  novels. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Mostly  novels? 

Mr.  Nagy.  Yes,  or  poems. 

Mr.  ScHERER,  Do  these  come  from  Iron  Curtain  countries  ? 

Mr.  Nagy.  I  really  wouldn't  be  able  to  tell  you  that. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  But  they  are  books  that  you  advertise  for  sale  in  the 
Hungarian  Word. 

Mr.  Nagy^  Personally,  I  didn't  buy  any  and  I  don't  know  any  of 
these  books,  so  I  won't  be  able  to  answer  where  they  were  printed. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Who  in  your  organization  would  know  the  answer  to 
the  question  ? 

Mr.  Nagy.  Most  probably  the  manager  of  the  paper  would  know. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  I  have  no  further  questions. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Did  I  undei-stand  you  to  say  that  you  were  born  in 
Minnesota  ? 

Mr.  Nagy.  St.  Paul,  Minn. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Is  that  where  your  parents  were  born  ? 

Mr.  Nagy.  No,  they  came  from  Hungary  and  I  was  born  here. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Wlien  did  you  come  to  New  York  ? 

Mr.  Nagy.  I  went  back  to  Hungary  to  my  mother.  She  took  me 
back  in  1921.  I  came  back  to  my  country,  to  the  United  States  of 
America,  in  1937. 

Since  then  I  am  a  resident  mostly  of  New  York  and  lately  Jersey. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Any  further  questions? 

Mr.  Scherer.  Did  you  serve  in  tlie  Armed  Forces,  sir  ? 

Mr.  Nagy.  No.  I  was  deferred  on  two  grounds.  I  was  engaged 
in  public  health  and  family  hardship. 

5lr.  Moulder.  The  witness  is  excused. 

( Witness  excused. ) 

Mr.  Arens.  Clara  Reich,  please  come  forward. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  you  are 
about  to  give  will  be  the  truth,  the  wliole  truth,  and  nothing  but  the 
truth,  so  help  you  God  ? 

Mrs.  Reich.  I  do. 

TESTIMONY  OF  MRS.  CLARA  REICH,  ACCOMPANIED  BY  COUNSEL, 

ABRAHAM  UNGER 

Mr.  Arexs.  Kindly  identify  youi-self  by  name,  residence,  and  occu- 
pation. 

Mrs.  Reich.  My  name  is  Mrs.  ('lara  Reich,  7-59  Custer  Street, 
Bronx,  N.Y. 

Mr.  Arexs.  And  your  occupation  ? 

Mrs.  Reich.  I  am  a  secretray  or  technical  worker. 

Mr.  Arexs.  You  are  appearing  here  today  in  response  to  a  subpena 
^vhicli  was  served  upon  you  by  the  House  Committee  on  Un-American 
Activities? 

Mrs.  Reich,  Yes. 


410  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

Mrs.  Arens.  You  are  represented  by  counsel  ? 

Mrs.  Reich.  Yes. 

Mr.  UxGER.  Abraham  Unger,  320  Broadway. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  and  when  were  you  born  ? 

Mrs.  Reich.  In  Hungary  in  1912. 

Mr.  Arens.  When  did  you  come  to  the  United  States  ? 

Mrs.  Reich.  1937. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  a  citizen  of  the  United  States  ? 

Mrs.  Reich.  I  am. 

Mr.  Arens.  By  naturalization  or  derivation  ? 

Mrs.  Reich.  Naturalization. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  and  when  were  you  naturalized  ? 

Mrs.  Reich.  In  1942,  Southern  District  of  New  York. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  a  Communist  when  you  were  naturalized  ? 

Mrs.  Reich.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  are  you  employed  ? 

Mrs.  Reich.  Hungarian  Word,  Inc. 

Mr.  Arens.  How  long  have  you  been  so  employed  ? 

Mrs.  Reich.  About  21/2  years  or  3  years. 

Mr.  Arens.  In  what  capacity  ^ 

Mrs.  Reicti.  As  a  technical  worker. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  do  you  do  as  a  technical  worker  ? 

Mrs.  Reich.  I  take  care  of  correspondence  with  the  readers,  I  send 
them  their  receipts,  I  take  care  of  the  circulation  department. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  was  your  occupation  immediateley  prior  to  your 
occupation  with  the  Hungarian  Word  ? 

Mrs.  Reich.  I  was  unempk\ved. 

Mr.  Moulder.  jSIay  I  ask  at  this  point,  JNIr.  Arens :  Is  the  circulation 
of  this  newspaper  restricted  to  the  city  of  New  York  ? 

Mrs.  Reich.  No ;  it  is  a  national  newspaper. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  majority  of  the  subscribers  are  here  in  the  city 
of  New  York  ? 

Mrs.  Reich.  I  don't  know.    I  wouldn't  say  that. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Is  that  so  ? 

Mrs.  Reich.  All  over  the  United  States. 

jSIr.  Moulder.  All  over  the  United  States  ? 
Mrs.  Reich.  Yes. 

Mr.  Moilder.  It  covers  the  entire  country  ? 

Mrs.  Reich.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  was  your  last  employment  prior  to  your  present 
employment? 

Mrs.  Reich.  My  last  emi)]ovment  was  with  Hungarian  Brother- 
hood, IWO. 

INIr.  Arens.  How  long  were  you  employed  there  and  in  what 
capacity? 

Mrs.  Reich.  I  was  employed  there — I  wouldn't  be  sure — about  16 
years  as  a  technical  employee. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  been  connected  with  Nok  Vilaga,  Inc. — 
Women's  World  i 

Mrs.  Reich.  Yes ;  since  October  I  am  secretary,  I  think. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  then,  secretary  of  that*  publication  as  well  as 
employed  by  the  Hungarian  Word,  or  have  you  now  become  dis- 
associated from  Women's  World  ? 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  411 

Mrs.  Reich.  No.  I  am  just  secretary  of  tlie  corporation  of  the 
Nok  Vilaga.    I  am  not  employed  by  them. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Yon  are  presently  secretary  of  the  publishing  firm 
which  })nblislies  Women's  World ;  is  that  riglit  ? 

Mrs.  Reich.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Do  you  receive  any  compensation  for  that  ? 

Mrs.  Reich.  I  don't. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Are  yon  a  Communist  ? 

Mrs.  Reich.  I  decline  to  ansAver  on  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Do  you  know  a  man  by  the  name  of  John  Lautner  ? 

Mrs.  Reich.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  same  basis. 

Mr.  Arexs.  He  identified  you  under  oath  2  days  ago  before  this 
committee  as  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party.  Was  he  lying  or 
telling  the  truth? 

Mrs.  Reich.  I  decline  to  answer  to  that  question  on  the  same  basis. 

]Mr.  Arexs.  Have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  the  IWO,  Interna- 
tional Workers  Order  ? 

Mrs.  Reich.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  same  basis. 

Mr.  Arexs.  You  were  employed  by  them,  were  you  not  ? 

Mrs.  Reich.  I  didn't  have  to  be  a  member  for  that. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Were  you  also  a  member? 

Mrs.  Reich.  I  decline  to  answer. 

Mr.  xA_rexs.  As  a  former  employee  of  the  IWO  and  a  present  officer 
or  present  employee  of  the  Hungarian  Word  and  secretary  of  the 
Women's  World,  kindly  tell  this  committee  whether  or  not  the  IWO, 
International  Workers  Order,  subsidized  certain  publications  includ- 
ing Women's  World  and  the  predecessor  publication  to  Hungarian 
Word. 

Mrs.  Reich.  I  wouldn't  know  that. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Have  you  ever  been  to  Hungary  ? 

Mrs.  Reich.  I  was  born  there. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Since  you  came  to  the  United  States? 

Mrs.  Reich.  No,  I  wasn't. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Who  is  Catherine  Gyarmaty? 

Mrs.  Reich.  She  is  the  editor  of  the  Nok  Vilaga. 

Mr.  xVrexs.  That  is  the  publishing  firm  of  which  you  are  the  secre- 
tary, is  that  correct? 

Mrs.  Reich.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Is  she  a  Communist  ? 

Mrs.  Reich.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arexs,  Who  is  Margaret  Torok? 

Mrs.  Reich.  I  think  she  is  the  ]:)resident  of  that  same  corporation. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Is  she  a  Communist? 

Mrs.  Reich.  I  decline  to  answer.    I  don't  even  know. 

Mr.  Arexs.  I  respectfully  suggest,  ^Mr.  Chairman,  that  would  con- 
clude the  staft'  interrogation  of  this  witness. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Are  there  any  questions,  Mr.  Scherer? 

iSIr.  Scherer.  Yes.  Are  there  any  other  Hungarian  papers  in  the 
country  ? 

Mrs.  Reich.  I  guess  so.  Other  Hungarian  publications  in  this 
country  ? 

Mr.  Scherer.  Newspapers. 

Mrs.  Reich.  There  are. 

00121 — 57 — pt.  6 4 


412  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    EST    THE    UNITED    STATES 

Mr.  ScHEREK.  Similar  to  yours? 

Mrs.  Reich.  There  are. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Which  is  the  most  prominent  of  the  Hungarian  news- 
papers? 

Mrs.  Reich.  That  I  wouldn't  know. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Do  you  know  which  has  the  largest  circulation  ? 

Mrs.  Reich.  I  don't  know.  There  are  many  Hungarian  papers,  but 
I  don't  know  what  the  circulation  is. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Are  there  any  others  that  are  printed  here  in  New 
York? 

Mrs.  Reich.  They  might  be.  I  think  there  are  some  weeklies.  The 
Ember  is  printed  in  New  York.  It  is  called  The  Man  in  English. 
That  is  printed  in  New  York  I  guess.    I  don't  know. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Yours  is  a  newspaper,  is  it  not  ? 

Mrs.  Reich.  Ours  is  weekly  newspaper, 

Mr.  Scherer.  You  do  not  know  which  of  the  Hungarian  papers 
then,  has  the  largest  circulation,  do  you? 

Mrs.  Reich.  I  don't  know. 

Mr.  Scherer.  I  have  no  further  questions. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  witness  is  excused. 

(Witness  excused.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Michael  Savides,  come  forward. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  which  you 
are  about  to  give  will  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth  and  nothing  but 
the  truth  so  help  you  God? 

Mr.  Savides.  I  do. 

TESTIMONY  OF  MICHAEL  SAVIDES,  ACCOMPANIED  BY  COUNSEL, 

IRA  GOLLOBIN 

Mr.  Arens.  Kindly  identify  yourself  by  name,  residence,  and  occu- 
pation. 

Mr.  Savides.  Michael  Savides,  322  West  20th  Street,  New  York 
City. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  your  occupation? 

Mr.  Savides.  Newspaperman. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  appearing  today  in  response  to  a  subpena 
served  upon  you  by  the  House  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities? 

Mr.  SA^^DES.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  represented  by  counsel  ? 

Mr.  Sa\tdes.  Yes. 

Mr.  GoLLOBiN.  Ira  Gollobin,  1441  Broadway,  New  York,  18. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  and  when  were  you  born  ? 

Mr.  Savides.  In  Larnaca,  the  Greek  island  of  Cyprus. 

Mr.  Arens.  'Wlien? 

Mr.  Savides.  1903. 

Mr.  Arens.  When  did  you  come  to  the  United  States  for  permanent 
residence  ? 

Mr.  Savides.  1927. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  a  citizen  of  the  United  States? 

Mr.  Savides.  Yes,  sir. 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    EST    THE    UNITED    STATES  413 

Mr.  Arens.  By  naturalization  or  derivation  ? 

Mr.  Savides.  Naturalization. 

Mr.  Arens.  ^Mien  and  where  were  you  naturalized? 

Mr.  Savides.  I  decline  to  answer  that  using  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  ask  that  you  direct  the  witness  to 
•answer  the  question  as  to  where  and  when  he  was  naturalized? 

Mi-.  ]\Ioulder.  Yes ;  the  committee  rejects  your  refusal  to  answer  the 
question.  You  are  directed  to  answer  the  question.  The  purpose  of 
so  advising  you  is  to  inform  you  that  the  committee  does  not  accept 
your  response  and  to  advise  you  of  the  possible  dangers  of  being 
guilty  of  contempt  of  Congress. 

Mr.  Savides.  I  still  think  and  I  believe  that,  according  to  the  consti- 
tutional rights  which  I  have,  I  can  use  the  fifth  amendment  as  a  source 
of  defending  myself  and  be  able  not  to  be  incriminated. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Do  you  conscientiously  believe  that  to  answer  the 
question  as  to  when  and  where  you  were  naturalized  might  tend  to 
incriminate  you  ? 

Mr.  Savides.  I  decline  to  answer  that  on  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  Scherer.  I  ask,  Mr.  Chairman,  that  you  direct  the  witness  to 
ranswer  that  question. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  witness  is  so  directed. 

(The  witness  consulted  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  SA^^DES.  I  still  think  it  might  incriminate  me. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  a  Communist  when  you  were  naturalized? 

Mr.  Scherer.  Just  a  minute.  Is  there  something  in  your  applica- 
tion for  naturalization  that  might  tend  to  incriminate  you  ?  Is  that 
the  reason  you  are  refusing  to  answer  ? 

Mr.  Savides.  I  still  decline  because  it  might  tend  to. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Wlien  you  made  your  application  for  naturalization, 
did  you  tell  the  truth  to  all  the  questions  asked  ? 

Mr.  Savides.  I  still  stand  on  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Mr.  Chairman,  in  view  of  this  witness'  statement,  I 
think  this  is  a  matter  that  should  be  referred  to  the  Department  of 
Justice  to  determine  whether  or  not  proceedings  should  be  commenced 
to  denaturalize  this  individual. 

Mr.  Arens.  When  you  came  to  the  United  States,  did  you  jump 
ship  or  did  you  come  under  the  quotas? 

Mr.  Savides.  I  came  in  the  United  States  quota. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  now  a  Communist  ? 

Mr.  Savides.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  is  your  present  occupation  ? 

Mr.  SAvroES.  On  that,  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  Arens.  As  a  matter  of  fact,  you  are  presently,  are  you  not,  the 
business  manager  of  the  Greek- American  Tribune  ? 

Mr.  Savides.  I  decline  to  answer  that. 

Mr.  Arens.  We  will  lay  before  you,  if  you  please,  the  statement 
required  by  the  postal  laws  of  the  Greek- American  Tribune,  which  you 
signed  with  reference  to  that  publication,  and  designated  yourself  as 
business  manager  of  the  Greek-American  Tribune. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Does  the  record  show  that  the  witness  is  examin- 
ing the  document  now  referred  to  by  the  counsel  ? 

(Document  marked  "Savides  Exhibit  No.  1,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files. ) 


414  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

Mr.  Arens.  Look  at  that  document,  if  you  please,  Mr.  Savides,  and 
tell  this  committee  whether  or  not  you  are  accurately  described  in 
that  document. 

(The  witness  consulted  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Savides.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  put  it  to  you  as  a  fact  and  ask  you  to  affirm  or  deny 
the  fact  that  you  are  business  manager  of  the  Greek- American  Tribune. 

Mr.  Savides.  I  believe  in  the  Constitution  of  the  United  States 
and  as  a  citizen  I  have  a  right  to  defend  the  Constitution  of  the  United 
States  and  myself.    I  stand  on  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  That  statement  comes  in  ill  grace  from  a  man  who 
will  not  even  tell  a  congressional  committee  as  to  where  and  when 
he  became  a  citizen  of  the  United  States. 

Mr.  Savides.  I  have  the  riglit  and  I  hold  my  rights. 

Mr.  Arens.  Now,  I  lay  before  you  two  copies  of  the  Greek-Ameri- 
can Tribune.  Please  look  at  these  publications  and  tell  this  committee 
while  you  are  under  oatli  whether  or  not  you  are  the  business  manager 
of  that  publication.  (Published  weekly  by  Proodos  Publishing  Co., 
New  York. 

(Documents  marked  "Savides  Exhibit  No.  2"  retained  in  committee 
files.)  ^ 

Mr.  SA^^DES.  I  stated  before ;  I  decline. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  respectfully  suggest  that,  in  the  presence  of  this  wit- 
ness, another  witness  be  sworn. 

Mr.  Charles  Solon,  please  come  forward. 

Mr,  Moulder.  Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  you  are 
about  to  give  will  be  the  ti'uth,  the  whole  truth,  and  nothing  but  the 
truth,  so  help  you  God  ? 

Mr.  Solon.  I  do. 

TESTIMONY  OF  CHARLES  SOLON 

Mr.  Arens.  Kindly  identify  yourself  by  name,  residence,  and  occu- 
pation. 

Mr.  Solon.  Charles  Solon,  852  East  I72d  Street,  Bronx,  N.  Y. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  your  occupation  ? 

Mr.  Solon.  Consultant  for  the  Immigration  and  Naturalization 
Service  and  part-time  interpreter. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Solon,  have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  the  Com- 
munist Party  ? 

Mr.  Solon.  I  was. 

Mr.  Arens.  Give  us,  if  you  please,  a  brief  sketch  of  the  facts  with 
respect  to  your  membei-ship  in  the  Communist  Party,  the  period  of 
your  service,  and  any  posts  or  offices  yoy  may  have  held  in  the  party. 

Mr.  Solon.  I  joined  the  Communist  Party  at  about  the  end  of 
1924  and  left  or  was  expelled  from  the  Communist  Party  about  Sep- 
tembei-  of  1934. 

Mr.  Arens.  During  the  course  of  your  membership  in  the  Com- 
munist Party,  did  you  know  a  person  by  the  name  of  Mike  Savides^ 

Mr.  Solon.  I  did. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  see  that  person  in  the  hearing  room  today  ? 

Mr.  Solon.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  Would  you  point  him  out  to  the  committee  ? 

Mr.  Solon.  The  gentleman  here. 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    IHVITED    STATES  415 

TESTIMONY  OF  MICHAEL  SAVIDES— Resumed 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Savides,  you  have  just  lieard  the  testimony  of  Mr. 
Solon,  have  you  not  ? 

Mr.  Savides.  I  think  I  did.     I  lieard. 

Mr.  Arens.  He  just  now  identified  you,  under  oath,  as  a  person 
Ivuown  by  him  to  ha^e  been  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party.  Was 
he  lying  or  was  he  telling  the  truth  ? 

Mr.  Savides.  I  decline  to  say.  That  is  his  own  business.  That  is 
not  mine. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  It  is  not  only  his  business.  It  is  more  important 
business  to  you. 

TESTIMONY  OF  CHARLES  SOLON— Resumed 

Mr.  Solon,  can  you  give  us  the  basis  of  the  information  upon  which 
vou  identify  this  witness  as  having  been  a  member  of  the  Communist 
Party? 

JNIr.  Solon.  I  met  with  Mr.  Savides  on  many,  many  occasions  at 
niunerous  party  meetings  of  the  Greek  section  of  the  Communist 
Party,  and  I  had  many  occasions  to  meet  with  Mr.  Savides  in  his 
<apacity  as  a  leading  member  of  the  Greek  section  of  the  Communist 
Party  while  I  was  also  one  of  the  leading  members  of  the  Communist 
Party  of  the  Gi'eek  section  and  in  charge  of  the  Greek  organ  of  the 
Communist  Party  in  1931. 

]\Ir.  jMoulder.  Are  there  any  other  questions? 

Mr.  Arens.  No  further  questions  of  Mr,  Solon. 

Mr.  Moulder.  He  will  be  recalled  later  on  as  a  witness? 

Mr.  Arens.  No  ;  as  far  as  we  are  concerned,  he  may  b©  excused. 

Mr.  Scherer.  When  did  you  say  you  left  the  Connnunist  Party? 

:\rr.  Solon.  1934,  September. 

Mr.  Arens.  That  is  all  for  the  present,  if  you  please.  Mr.  Chairman. 

^Ir.  Moulder.  He  is  excused  as  a  witness.  Mr.  Solon,  you  are 
excused  as  a  witness.     Thank  you  very  much  for  your  information. 

(Witness  Solon  was  excused.) 

TESTIMONY  OF  MICHAEL  SAVIDES— Resumed 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Savides,  who  is  the  editor  of  the  Greek- American 
Tribune  ? 

JNIr.  Savides.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  is  the  circulation  of  the  Greek-xVmerican  Trib- 
une ? 

Mr.  Savides.  I  decline  to  answer. 

Mr.  Arens.  "V\nio  publishes  the  Greek-American  Tribune? 

Mr.  Savides.  Still  the  same  answer. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  connected  or  have  you  been  connected  with  the 
International  Workers  Order? 

Mr.  Savides.  I  decline  to  answer  on  that  question. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  the  Greek- American  Tribune  controlled  by  the  Com- 
munist conspiracy? 

Mr.  Savides.  I  decline  to  answer. 

]Mr.  Arens.  The  Daily  Worker  for  May  2,  1956,  which  I  now  hold 
in  my  hand — the  Communist  Daily  Worker  lists  you  as  a  speaker  at 


416  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

the  May  Day  rally  held  in  Union  Square  in  this  city  just  last  year. 

Please  look  at  this  photostatic  copy  of  the  Communist  Daily 
Worker  and  see  if  you  will  be  good  enough  to  tell  this  committee 
whether  or  not  the  facts  are  accurately  reported  there. 

(Document  marked  "Savides  Exhibit  No.  3"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  record  should  show  the  witness  examining  the 
document, 

Mr.  Arens.  Would  you  kindly  respond  to  the  question  ? 

Mr.  Savides.  I  decline. 

Mr.  Arens.  Now,  we  have  a  photograph  which  was  taken  at  that 
May  Day  celebration,  a  photograph  showing  you  making  a  speech  and 
right  next  to  it  is  the  name,  Michael  Savides.  Please  look  at  that 
photograph  and  see  if  you  would  not  be  good  enough  to  help  the 
Committee  on  Un-American  Activities  by  identifying  your  physical 
features  there.     Is  that  a  good  likeness  of  you? 

Mr.  Savides.  I  still  decline. 

(Document  marked  "Savides  Exhibit  No.  4"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files. ) 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  not  ashamed  of  your  own  photograph,  are  you? 

Mr.  Savides.  That's  a  different  thing. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  beg  your  pardon  ? 

Mr.  Savides.  I  say  that's  a  difterent  question. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  been  to  Greece? 

Mr.  Savides.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  When? 

Mr.  Savides.  Wlien  I  was  coming  to  the  United  States. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  been  back  to  Greece  ? 

Mr.  Savides.  Yes ;  I  went  in  1933. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  been  there  since  ? 

Mr.  Savides.  No. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  occasioned  your  trip  to  Greece  in  1933? 

Mr.  Sa\t[de8.  I  just  took  a  trip. 

Mr.  Arens,  Under  whose  auspices?     Just  a  personal  trip? 

Mr,  Savides.  With  my  money. 

Mr.  Arens,  I  beg  your  parclon  ? 

Mr,  Savides,  With  my  money.  My  pocket  money,  after  I  worked 
hard  to  make  the  money  during  the  depression, 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  would  con- 
clude the  staff  interrogation  of  this  witness. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Any  questions,  Mr.  Scherer? 

Mr.  Scherer.  I  am  going  to  ask  the  witness  once  again  and  if  you 
do  not  answer  the  question,  you  are  placing  yourself  in  contempt  of  the 
committee.     When  and  where  were  you  "naturalized? 

Mr.  Savides.  As  I  said  before  I  still  decline  on  the  grounds  that  I 
have  the  right  to  use  the  fifth  amendment  because  I  am  an  American 
citizen  and  I  know  my  constitutional  rights.  I  want  to  show  I  know 
how  to  defend  my  constitutional  rights. 

Mr.  Scherer.  1  did  not  ask  you  whether  you  made  any  false  state- 
ments in  that  application.  I  just  asked  you  when  and  where  you  were 
naturalized. 

In  the  opinion  of  this  member  of  the  committee,  at  least,  he  places 
himself  in  contempt  because  it  is  a  public  record. 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  417 

Mr.  Savides.  I  still  decline  because  it  might  tend  to  incriminate  me. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Mr.  Chairman,  so  that  the  record  is  clear,  I  ask  that 
you  direct  the  witness  once  again  to  answer  the  question  after  my 
statement. 

Mr.  Moulder.  As  requested  by  Mr.  Scherer,  the  witness  is  directed 
to  answer  the  question. 

Mr.  Savides.  Again  the  same  answer. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  committee  is  refusing  to  accept  your  response  to 
the  question.     Therefore,  you  are  directed  to  answer. 

Mr.  Savides.  I  said  before  and  I  still  say  that  I  stand  on  the  fifth 
amendment  because,  otherwise,  it  might  tend  to  incriminate  me. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Were  you  naturalized? 

Mr.  Savides.  I  said  before ;  yes. 

Mr.  Scherer.  And  then  I  submit  for  another  reason,  Mr  Chairman, 
he  waived  the  privilege  if  he  ever  had  any  and  I  don't  believe  he  has. 
He  says  he  was  naturalized. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Any  more  questions? 

Mr.  Arens.  No  ;  thank  you,  sir. 

Mr.  Moulder.  You  are  excused  as  a  witness. 

(The  witness  was  excused.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  James  Lee,  please  come  forward. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  you  are 
about  to  give  will  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth  and  nothing  but  the 
truth,  so  help  you  God? 

Mr.  Lee.  I  do. 

TESTIMONY  OM  JAMES  LEE  (SHEW  HONG)  ACCOMPANIED  BY 
COUNSEL,  PAUL  ROSS 

Mr.  Eoss.  I  would  like  a  statement  on  the  record  of  the  subject  of 
the  inquiry  to  be  directed  to  this  particular  witness. 

Mr.  Scherer.  I  object. 

Mr.  Arens.  Please  identify  yourself  by  name,  residence,  and  occu- 
pation. 

Mr.  Lee.  My  name  in  English  is  James  Lee,  Shew  Hong  in  Chinese. 

Mr.  Arens.  Your  residence  and  occupation  ? 

Mr.  Lee.  56  East  Fourth  Street,  New  York  City.  I  am  a  news- 
paperman. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  appearing  today,  Mr.  Lee,  in  response  to  a 
subpena  which  was  served  upon  you  by  the  House  Committee  on 
Un-American  Activities  ? 

Mr.  Lee.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  represented  by  counsel  ? 

Mr.  Lee.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Counsel,  kindly  identify  yourself  ? 

Mr.  Koss.  Paul  Ross,  160  Broadway,  New  York  City. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  and  when  were  you  born,  please  ? 

Mr.  Ross.  Before  you  proceed 

Mr.  Arens.  I  might  read  you  the  rules,  counsel.  The  sole  and  ex- 
clusive prerogatives  of  comisel  before  this  committee  are  to  advise  his 
client  of  his  legal  rights. 

Where  and  when  were  vou  born  ? 


418  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

Mr,  Ross.  All  I  asked  the  chairman  was  a  statement  of  the  purpose 
of  the  inquiry. 

Mr.  Moulder.  You  request  has  been  overruled.  You  are  being  vex- 
atious by  askins;  that. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  and  when  were  you  born  ? 

Mr.  Lee.  I  was  born  in  1915,  in  China. 

Mr.  Arens.  Wlien  did  you  come  to  the  United  States  ? 

Mr.  Lee.  1930. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  come  under  the  quotas  or  did  you  come  other- 
wise ? 

Mr.  Lee.  My  father  was  a  citizen. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  beg  your  pardon  ? 

Mr.  Lee.  My  father  was  a  citizen. 

Mr.  Arens.  When  did  you  arrive  in  the  United  States? 

Mr.  Lee.  1930. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  you  are  a  citizen  of  the  United  States? 

Mr.  Lee.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  By  derivation  or  naturalization? 

Mr.  Lee.  Derivation. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  are  you  employed? 

(The  witness  consulted  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Lee,  May  I  ask  the  chairman  that  you  state  the  reason  for  this 
hearing  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Your  lawyer  just  told  you  to  say  that,  did  he  not? 

Mr.  Ross.  I  have  a  right  to  advise  the  client. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  do  not  have  a  i-ight  to  advise  him  to  vex  or  harass 
this  committee  or  overrule  the  decisions  of  the  chairman  of  this 
committee. 

Tell  us  where  you  are  employed,  Mr.  Lee. 

Mr.  Lee.  I  refuse  to  answer  that  question  on  the  ground  of  the  first 
and  fifth  amendments. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  honestly  contend  that  if  you  told  this  committee 
truthfully  where  you  are  employed  you  would  be  supplying  informa- 
tion which  might  be  used  against  you  in  a  criminal  proceeding? 

Mr.  Lee.  I  suppose. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  would  like  to  lay  before  you,  Mr.  Lee,  a  photostatic 
reproduction  of  the  statement  filed  by  the  China  Daily  News  pursuant 
to  the  postal  laws  in  which  you  are  identified  as  editor  and  as  man- 
aging editor  of  the  China  Daily  News,  Inc.  Kindly  look  at  that  and 
tell  us  while  under  oath  whether  or  not  that  is  a  true  and  correct 
and  accurate  description  of  your  status  Avith  that  publication, 

Mr.  Lee.  I  decline  to  answer  under  the  first  and  fifth  amendment, 

(Document  marked  "Lee  Exhibit  No.  1"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files. ) 

Mr,  Arens.  You  read  Chinese,  do  you  not? 

Mr.  Lee,  I  do, 

Mr.  Arens.  We  would  like  to  have  you,  if  you  please,  follow  in 
Chinese  some  of  these  excerpts  from  this  China  Daily  News  that  Mr. 
Bonora  is  going  to  read.  We  have  3  or  4  of  them  here.  He  is  going 
to  read  them  very  slowly  and  you  follow  them  if  you  please,  in  Chinese, 
and  tell  us  Jifter  he  has  concluded  whether  or  not  he  has  given  a  true 
and  correct  translation  of  the  various  issues. 

Mr.  BoNORA.  These  are  summarized  reports : 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  419 

[China  Daily  News,  October  26.  1956] 

To  Overthrow  the  People's  Authority  Is  a  Fantasy  ;  Riots  of  Reactionaries 
IN  Poland  and  Hungary;  the  Riots  Have  Subsided  Under  the  Joint 
Suppression  of  the  People  and  the  Government 

A  summarized  report 

In  the  last  few  daj's,  under  the  direction  of  foreign  imperialists,  counter-revolu- 
tionaries of  Poland  and  Hungary  have  staged  riots  in  many  places  in  these 
two  countries,  tryinji  to  overthrow  the  peoples'  democratic  authorities  and  re- 
store the  old  capitalistic  systems.  But  this  fantasy  vanished  under  the  con- 
certed blow  of  the  working  people  and  their  governments.  At  present  the  riots 
have  been  suppressed,  and  public  order  has  begun  to  be  restored. 

Rased  on  a  broadcast  from  Warsaw,  groups  of  narrowminded  nationalists 
staged  anti-Soviet  demonstrati(»ns  at  Wei-lo-k'o-lo  Monday  evening.  They  In- 
tended to  cast  a  dark  shadow  on  Soviet-l'olish  friendship,  but  this  intrigue  failed 
to  materialize. 

According  to  news  from  Budai>est,  in  Hungary,  reactionaries,  hidden  among 
the  people,  rioted  on  October  23,  aiming  at  the  overthrow  of  the  people's  au- 
thority. According  to  the  news,  these  countei'-revolutionaries  who  had  been 
constantly  instigated  by  foreign  reactionaries,  rioted. 

Although  they  have  destroyed  some  public  enterprises  and  caused  some  blood- 
shed, the  intrigues  did  not  succeed,  as  a  result  of  joint  suppression  by  the  masses 
of  people  and  their  national  forces. 

Mr.  Arens.  oNIr.  Lee,  is  that  a  substantially  correct  translation  of  the 
paper  that  is  now  before  you  ?  I  realize  there  is  a  difficulty  of  trans- 
lating: from  Chinese  to  English. 

Is  that  substantiall}^  correct? 

Mr.  Lee.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  under  the  first  amend- 
ment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  the  witness 
be  ordered  and  directed  to  answer  that  question. 

]\Ir.  Moulder.  Yes,  tlie  record  should  show  that  the  witness  ex- 
amined the  document  leferred  to  by  counsel  and  that  he  followed  the 
i-eading  of  the  transcript  by  Mr.  Bonora  as  he  read. 

Therefore,  you  are  directed  to  answer  the  question.  The  reason  for 
giving  this  direction  is  to  show  clearly  that  the  committee  refuses  to 
accept  your  refusal  to  answer  and  to  also  advise  you  of  the  possible 
dangers  of  being  in  contempt  of  Congi-ess. 

(The  witness  consulted  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Lee.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  still  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  the 
first  and  fifth  amendments. 

(Document  marked  "Lee  Exhibit  No.  2,"  and  retained  in  coinmittee 
tiles.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  so  this  record  may  be  absolutely  clear,  I 
request  that  an  oath  be  administered  to  Mr.  Bonora  so  he  can  identify 
the  translations. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  you  are 
about  to  give  will  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and  nothing  but  the 
truth,  so  help  you  God  ? 

Mr.  Bonora.  I  do. 

TESTIMONY  OF  FEANK  BONORA 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  Frank  Bonora,  an  investigator  for  tlie  House 
Committee  on  Un-American  Activities,  is  that  correct? 
Mr.  Bonora.  That  is  correct. 


420  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

Mr.  Arens.  Pursuant  to  directions  from  myself,  did  you  cause  to 
be  translated  certain  issues  of  the  China  Daily  News  by  the  official 
translators  in  the  Library  of  Congress? 

Mr.  BoNORA.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  have  those  translations  with  you  today  ? 

Mr.  BoNORA.  Yes,  I  do. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  those  translations  include  that  translation  you  just 
read  ? 

Mr.  BoNORA.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  they  also  include  the  translations  which  you  pres- 
ently have  in  your  hand  and  propose  to  read  in  just  a  few  moments? 

Mr.  BoNORA.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Aeens.  That  will  be  all.    Thank  you. 

TESTIMONY  OF  JAMES  LEE— Eesumed 

Mr.  Moulder.  Mr.  Lee,  do  you  understand  the  question  propounded 
to  you  was  merely  whether  or  not  the  translation  read  by  Mr.  Bonora 
was  a  substantially  true  and  correct  translation  of  the  document  which 
you  held  in  your  hand  and  followed  the  reading  of  during  the  time  he 
was  reading  ? 

You  understand  that  is  all  that  is  being  asked  of  you,  whether  or 
not  it  is  true  or  correct.     You  said  you  could  speak  and  read  Chinese. 

Mr.  Lee.  Yes. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  question  was  asked  whether  or  not  it  was  a  sub- 
stantially correct  translation.    You  understand  that? 

Mr.  Lee.  Yes ;  I  do. 

iSIr.  ]MouLDER.  And  j^ou  still  decline  to  answer,  even  though  directed 
by  the  committee? 

Mr.  Lee.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Would  you  proceed.  Mr.  Bonora,  please,  to  read  addi- 
tional excerpts  from  another  issue  of  the  China  Daily  News  and  iden- 
tify the  issue  ? 

Mr.  Bonora  (reading)  : 

[China  Daily  News,  June  22,  1953] 

Although  Dead,  They  Left  a  Gloeious  Name — The  People  of  the  World 
MoTJKN  the  Death  of  the  Rosenberg  Couple  Who  Were  Innocent — Where 
Is  Democracy? — In  Union  Square  5.000  People  Prayed  for  Them 

(A   SUMMARIZED  REPORT  BY  THIS   NEWSPAPER,   JUNE   20,    1953) 

Mr.  and  Mrs.  Rosenberg,  falsely  accused  as  "atomic  spies,"  have  been  electro- 
cuted in  Sing  Sing  Prison.  Rosenberg,  35  years  old,  was  executed  yesterday 
evening  at  8 :  41 ;  Mrs.  Rosenberg,  37  years  old,  was  electrocuted  at  8 :  11.  This 
case  had  been  in  existence  for  over  2  years.  In  spite  of  the  righteous  protest 
of  the  people  of  the  world,  this  fine  young  couple  were  executed  under  the  orders 
of  the  American  Government,  leaving  two  sons,  Michael  Rosenberg,  age  10,  and 
Robert  Rosenberg,  age  6.  Both  Mr.  and  Mrs.  Rosenberg  were  very  calm  before 
the  execution,  and  the  latter  kissed  the  matron  before  she  sat  on  the  electric 
chair.  The  bodies  of  Mr.  and  Mrs.  Rosenberg  were  claimed  by  Mr.  Rosenberg's 
mother.     Interment  may  take  place  tomorrow. 

ELECTROCUTION  CANNOT  DESTROY  MR.  AND  MRS.  ROSENBERG HISTORY  WILL  DECIDE  THE 

"ROSENBERG    CASE" 

In  the  course  of  the  case,  Mr.  and  Mrs.  Rosenberg  maintained  from  the  begin- 
ning to  the  end  that  "We  are  innocent ;  we  demand  a  just  verdict."  The  National 
Committee  To  Secure  Justice  in  the  Rosenberg  Case  has  pointed  out  repeatedly 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    ES^    THE    UNITED    STATES  421 

that  electrocution  cannot  destroy  Mr.  and  Mrs.  Rosenberg.  The  Government  did 
not  give  Mr.  and  Mrs.  Rosenberg  a  fair  trial.  Based  only  on  evidence  supplied  by 
witnesses  who  were  bought  by  the  Government,  this  couple  were  sentenced  to 
death.  Recently  new  evidence  was  found,  but  the  Government  refused  to  grant 
them  a  new  trial,  thus  concluding  the  case  which  had  world  repercussions.  How- 
ever, this  committee  pointed  out  yesterday  that  they  would  not  cease  their  work 
of  seeking  the  truth,  despite  the  fact  that  Mr.  and  Mrs.  Rosenberg  were  dead. 
They  would  continue  their  tight  against  this  "case  of  false  accusation,"  so  that 
right  and  justice  might  prevail,  and  a  repetition  of  similar  cases  may  be  avoided 
in  the  future. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  that  a  true  and  correct  translation  of  the  issue  of  the 
China  Dailj'  News  which  is  before  you  now,  Mr.  Lee? 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  record  should  show  that  Mr.  Lee  has  been  read- 
ing the  document  which  you  have  just  referred  to. 

Mr.  Lee.  I  still  decline  to  answer  on  the  same  ground. 

(Document  marked  "Lee  Exhibit  No.  3,"  and  retained  in  committee 
files.) 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  witness  is  directed  to  answer. 

Mr.  Lee.  I  still  decline  on  the  same  groimd. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Lee,  do  you  ever  go  back  to  China  ? 

Mr.  Lee.  Since  I  have  come  here  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Yes. 

Mr.  Lee.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  know,  of  course,  that  the  Chinese  Red  machine  has 
destroyed  and  murdered  over  20  million  people  in  your  native  land,  do 
you  not  ? 

Mr.  Lee.  I  decline  to  answer. 

(The  witness  consulted  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Lee.  In  what  connection  are  you  asking  me  that  question  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  that  the  Chinese  Eed  machine  has  de- 
stroj^ed  and  murdered  over  20  million  people  of  your  native  land? 

(The  witness  consulted  wnth  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Lee.  Since  I  was  here  since  1930,  how  would  I  know  ?  I  was 
not  there. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  a  member  of  the  international  Communist 
apparatus  which  murdered  20  million  people  in  your  native  land  ? 

Mr.  Lee.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  same  ground. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  3'ou  now  a  Communist? 

Mr.  Lee.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  same  ground. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Bonora,  are  you  now  laying  before  the  witness  an- 
other edition  of  the  China  Daily  News? 

Mr.  BoNORA.  March  7,  1953. 

Mr.  Arens.  Please  read  some  of  the  excerpts  of  that  publication. 

Mr.  BoNORA  (reading)  : 

Joseph  Vissarionovich  Stalin — the  Great  Leader  of  the  Soviet  People, 
Teacher  of  the  International  Proletariat,  Pillar  of  the  World  Peace 
Front,  General  Secretary  of  the  U.  S.  S.  R.  Communist  Party,  and  Chair- 
man of  the  U.  S.  S.  R.  Council  of  Ministers — Has  Passed  Away 

The  peace-loving  peoples  of  the  world,  who  demand  progress  and  who  fight  for 
democratic  peace,  mourn  for  the  death  of  Stalin.  *  *  * 

Neither  friends  nor  foes  may  underestimate  Stalin's  influence  and  contribution 
to  the  world. 

He  led  the  people  of  Soviet  Russia  toward  the  road  of  happiness  and  led 
the  working  people  of  Soviet  Russia  victoriously  from  socialism  toward  the  con- 
structive work  of  Communism  *  *  * 


422  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

Mr.  Arexs.  Is  tliat  a  substantially  true  and  correct  translation,  Mr. 
Lee,  of  the  issue  of  the  China  Daily  News  presently  before  you? 

Mr.  Lee.  I  still  decline  to  answer  the  question  on  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  the  expressions  contained  in  that  article  coincide 
with  your  position  with  reference  to  Comrade  Stalin  ? 

Mr.  Lee.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  same  grounds. 

(Document  marked  "Lee  Exhibit  No.  4,"  and  retained  in  committee 
files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  have  another  translation  there,  Mr.  Bonora, 
that  3^ou  would  like  to  summarize  or  read  ?     Please  announce  the  issue. 

Mr.  Bonora.  This  is  Septemer  7,  1951,  and  relates  to  the  Japanese 
peace  treaty  signed  around  that  tmie.  It  is  entitled,  "If  You  Sow 
Bad  Seeds  You  Will  Eat  Bad  Fruits'' : 

President  Triimau  declared  during  the  Peace  Conference  with  Japan  held 
in  San  Francisco:  "This  peace  treaty  (referring  to  the  peace  ti'eaty  manufac- 
tiiretl  by  the  U.  S.  A.)  is  a  very  good  treaty  because  it  does  not  contain  the  seeds 
of  another  war.  This  treaty  renews  an  old  friendship.  It  looks  to  the  future 
and  forgets  the  past." 

Is  it  true  that  this  American-manufactured  peace  treaty  is  really  a  "very 
good  treaty''?  Aside  from  the  two  principal  nations  of  Asia — China  and  India — ■ 
which  have  repeatedly  expressed  their  indignation  and  I'esentment,  even  the 
people  of  Australia  are  very  much  dissatisfied  with  it. 

The  statement  of  Evatt,  former  President  of  the  United  Nations  General  As- 
sembly and  Deputy  Prime  Minister  and  concurrently  Minister  of  Foreign  Affairs 
of  Australia,  is  a  concrete  example. 

He  held  an  almost  identical  opinion  with  the  peoples  of  Asia.  He  believed  that 
the  United  States  manufactured  peace  treaty  is  not  only  a  violation  of  interna- 
tional agreements,  but  also  it  jeopardizes  the  security  of  Asia.  He  stated  that 
on  the  basis  of  this  peace  treaty,  the  Japanese  militarists  will  be  on  the  march  in 
all  directions. 

But  the  United  States  believes  that  the  rebuilding  of  Japanese  forces  would 
be  useful  in  resisting  Soviet  Russia  and  China,  but  this  is  a  great  fantasy. 
Finally  Evatt  stated  that  the  majority  of  people  in  Australia  understood  that 
the  peace  treaty  manufactured  by  the  United  States  of  America  would  imperil 
the  security  of  the  South  Pacific  and  southeast  Asia.  This  act  disgracefully 
ignores  international  justice. 

Just  because  this  treaty  is  iipfavorable  to  the  peoples  of  Asia  and  Australia, 
Truman  believes  it  is  a  very  good  treaty.  The  only  persons  who  may  profit  are 
the  American  monopolistic  capitalists  and  warmongers. 

This  treaty  permits  the  American  authorities  to  expand  and  organize  Japanese 
forces  without  restriction.  They  will  be  used  as  the  vanguard  and  cannon 
fodder.  This  treaty  permits  American  forces  to  be  stationed  permanently  in 
Japan,  and  to  use  it  as  a  springboard  for  future  military  movements. 

It  permits  American  authorities  in  the  name  of  justice  to  occupy  the  Ryukyu 
Islands,  Ogasawara  Gunto,  and  Formosa.  The  treaty  does  not  require  Japan 
to  pay  indemnities  to  the  victorious  nations,  but  to  place  her  financial  and  human 
resources  at  the  disposal  of  the  big  American  capitalists. 

In  short,  the  advantages  of  this  treaty  to  the  American  authorities  are  unlim- 
ited. This  is  the  reason  why  Eisenhower,  Dulles,  and  others  hurriedly  ordered 
the  satellites  to  sign  and  seal  this  one-sided  peace  treaty,  making  it  a  fait 
accompli  as  soon  as  possible. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  that  a  true  and  correct  translation  of  the  issue  of  the 
China.  Daily  News  as  presently  before  you  ? 

Mr.  Lee.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  same  ground. 

Mr.  Moulder.  You  are  again  directed  to  answer. 

(No  response.) 

(Document  marked  "Lee  Exhibit  No.  5,"  and  retained  in  committee 
files.) 

Mr.  Sciierer.  Why  do  you  fellows  not  go  back  to  Red  China  or 
Russia?     This  attack  on  the  United  States  and  praising  Red  China 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  423 

iind  the  Russian  Government  and  Connnunists — why  do  yoti  stay 
here?  Do  you  have  any  desire  to  go  back  like  some  of  these  others? 
Do  you  want  to  go  back  ?     I  am  asking  a  question. 

Mr.  Lee.  I  am  an  American  citizen. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  You  do  not  act  like  one.  You  are  an  American  citizen 
to  the  extent  of  using  the  rights  of  an  American  citizen,  but  you  con- 
tinue with  C-ommunist  activities. 

( No  response. ) 

Mr.  Arens.  Now,  we  would  like  to  lay  before  you,  and  invite  your 
attention  to  a  World  Peace  Appeal  signed  by  a  ninnber  of  people 
including  one  James  Lee,  Chinese  Youth  Club,  in  New  York.  Please 
look  at  this  document  and  tell  this  committee  while  you  are  under  oath 
whether  or  not  you  are  accurately  described  there  as  James  Lee,  of  the 
Chinese  Youth  Club  of  New  York  in  promoting  world  j^eace. 

Mr.  Lee.  I  decline  to  answer  the  question  on  the  fifth  amendment. 

(Docmnent  marked  "Lee  Exhibit  No.  O,"  and  retained  in  conmiittee 
files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  You  would  not  be  ashamed  of  promoting  world  peace, 
Avould  you,  unless  you  were  doing  it  as  part  and  parcel  of  an  interna- 
tional conspiratorial  apparatus? 

Mr.  Lee.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  same  ground. 

Mr.  Arexs.  How  long  have  you  been  employed  at  your  present  place 
of  employment  ? 

Mr.  Lee.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  same  groimd. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  respectfully  suggest,  Mr.  Chairman,  that  the  Avitness 
be  ordered  and  directed  to  answer  that  question. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  witness  is  so  ordered  and  directed. 

Mr.  Lee.  I  still  declirie  to  answer  imder  the  fourth  and  fifth  amend- 
3nent. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  registered,  or  have  you  ever  been  registered, 
under  the  Foreign  Agents  Registration  Act? 

(The  witness  consulted  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Lee.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  under  the  first  and  fifth 
amendment. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Did  you  attend  the  recent  Communist  Party  convention 
held  here  in  New  York  City  last  month? 

Mr.  Lee.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  same  ground. 

]\Ir.  Aren^s.  Do  you  know  Eugene  Moy  ? 

Mr.  Lee.  I  refuse  to  answer  on  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  Arexs.  He  is  one  of  the  owners  of  the  China  Dixilj  News,  is 
lie  not  ?  , 

Mr.  Lee.  I  decline  to  answ^er  on  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  Moulder.  May  I  ask,  Mr.  Arens,  do  we  have  any  information 
concerning  the  subscriptions  to  this  paper  or  the  amount  of  circulation  ? 

Mr.  Arexs.  We  do  not  have  that  information  with  us  in  these  hear- 
ings. We  are  in  the  process  of  trying  to  procure  it  right  now,  Mr. 
Chairman. 

Could  you  not  help  this  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities, 
undertaking  to  protect  this  Nation  under  whose  flag  you  have  protec- 
tion, by  telling  us  the  circulation  of  the  China  Daily  News? 

Mr.  Lee.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Are  you  a  loyal  American  ? 

(The  witness  consulted  with  his  counsel.) 


424  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

Mr.  Lee.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  a  member  of  an  apparatus  designed  to  destroy 
this  country  ? 

Mr.  Lee.  Will  you  give  me  that  question  again  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  a  member  of  a  foreign- controlled  apparatus 
designed  to  destroy  this  country  ? 

Mr.  Lee.  I  decline  to  answer  the  question  on  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Tlie  tragic  thing  is  that  you  give  these  fellows  citizen- 
ship and  then  the  first  thing  they  do  is  attempt  to  destroy  the  very 
Nation  that  gave  them  the  citizenship. 

Mr.  JSIoulder.  In  the  event  of  armed  conflict  between  the  United 
States  of  America 

Mr.  Lee.  I  beg  your  pardon.     I  would  like  to  answer  Mr.  Scherer. 

Mr.  Scherer.  I  did  not  ask  a  question ;  I  made  a  comment. 

Mr.  Lee.  Could  I  answer  it  ? 

My.  JNIgulder.  In  the  event  of  armed  conflict  between  the  United 
States  of  America  and  Red  China,  would  you  fight  for  the  United 
States  of  America  ? 

(The  witness  consulted  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Lee.  That  kind  of  question  is  a  speculative  question. 

Mr.  Moulder.  It  is  a  very  simple  question.  I  said  in  the  event  our 
country  should  become  involved  in  armed  conflict,  would  you  join  your 
country  in  fig:hting  for  your  country  against  Red  China  ? 

]\Ir.  Lee.  I  would  say  that,  if  the  United  States  was  attacked  by  a 
foreign  country,  I  would  defend  the  United  States.  If  it  is  attacked 
by  another  country,  I  would  come  forward  to  defend  the  country. 

Mr.  Scherer.  That  is  the  "out"  all  you  fellows  use.  Then,  you  can 
always  say  that  it  was  the  other  country.  That  the  United  States 
was  the  aggressor.  That  is  the  import  of  your  writings,  that  the 
United  States  is  the  aggressor.  That  would  excuse  you  from  fighting 
on  behalf  of  this  country  against  Red  China. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  we  have  no  further  questions,  and  there 
are  no  other  witnesses  under  subpena  to  a]Dpear  this  afternoon. 

Mr.  Moulder.  All  of  the  documents  which  counsel  presented  to  the 
witness  for  identification,  translation  and  examination  are  made  a 
part  of  the  record  by  reference. 

The  committee  will  stand  in  recess  until  10  o'clock  tomorrow 
morning. 

(Whereupon,  at  3 :  15  p.  m.,  Thursday,  March  14,  the  committee  was 
recessed,  to  be  reconvened  at  10  a.  m.,  Friday,  March  15,  1957.) 

(Committee  members  present:  Representatives  Moulder  and 
Scherer.) 


INVESTIGATION  OF  COMMUNIST  PROPAGANDA  IN 
THE  UNITED  STATES— PART  6 

(New  York  City  Area) 


FRIDAY,  MARCH   15,    1957 

United  States  House  of  Repuesentatives, 

Subcommittee  of  the 
Committee  on  Un-American  Activities, 

Nem  York,  N.  Y. 

PUBLIC   HEARING 

The  subcommittee  of  the  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities 
met,  pursuant  to  recess,  in  room  518,  United  States  Courthouse,  Foley 
Square,  New  York,  N.  Y.,  at  10  a.  m.,  Hon.  Morgan  M.  Moulder 
(chairman  of  the  subcommittee)  presiding. 

Committee  members  present :  Representatives  Morgan  M.  Moulder, 
of  Missouri,  and  Gordon  H.  Scherer,  of  Ohio. 

Staff  members  present:  Richard  Arens,  director,  W.  Jackson  Jones 
and  Frank  Bonora,  investigators. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  committee  will  be  in  order. 

The  next  witness  w411  be  Mr.  Michael  Tkach. 

Do  you  solemnly  swear  tliat  the  testimony  you  are  about  to  give 
shall  be  the  truth,  the  whole  trutli,  and  nothing  but  the  truth,  so  help 
3^ou  God  ? 

Mr.  Tkach.  I  do. 

TESTIMONY   OF  MICHAEL   TKACH,    ACCOMPANIED   BY   COUNSEL, 
ISADORE  G.  NEEDLEMAN 

Mr.  Arens.  Please  identify  yourself  by  name,  residence,  and  oc- 
cupation. 

Mr.  Tkach.  Michael  Tkach. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  your  residence  and  occupation  ? 

Mr.  Tkach.  I  am  a  journalist,  and  my  address  is  42  East  Third 
Street. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  appearing  today  in  response  to  a  subpena 
which  was  served  upon  you  by  the  House  Committee  on  Un-American 
Activitias  ? 

Mr.  Tkach.  Yes,  sir. 

JVIr.  Arens.  And  you  are  represented  by  counsel  ? 

Mr.  Tkach.  Yes. 

]\Ir.  Arens.  Counsel  kindly  identify  youi-self. 

Mr.  Needleman.  Isadore  G.  Needleman,  165  Broadway,  Xew 
York  6. 

425 


426  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  are  you  ein])loyed  ? 

Mr.  Tkacii.  I  refuse  to  answer  that  question. 

Mr.  Arens.  Why? 

(Witness  consults  with  counsel.) 

Mr.  Tkach.  On  the  ground  of  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  employed  as  editor  of  tlie  Ukrainian  Daily 
News  Inc.? 

Mr.  Tkach.  The  same ;  I  refuse  to  answer. 

Mr.  Arens.  We  lay  before  you  a  photostatic  reproduction  of  a 
statement  of  ownership  filed  pui'suant  to  the  provisions  of  the  postal 
laws  by  the  Ukrainian  Daily  News,  in  which  you  are  listed  as  editor 
of  the  Ukrainian  Daily  News.  Please  look  at  that  document  and  tell 
us  whether  or  not  you  are  accurately  described  therein. 

Mr.  Tkach.  The  fifth  amendment. 

(Document  marked  "Tkach  Exhibit  No.  1,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  and  when  were  you  born  ? 

Mr.  TiiACH.  In  1881,  in  Austria. 

Mr.  Arens.  When  did  you  come  to  the  United  States  for  perma- 
nent residence? 

Mr.  Tkach.  I  think  it  was  1908  or  1909. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  a  citizen  ? 

Mr.  Tkach.  Yes.' 

Mr.  Arends.  Were  you  naturalized  in  the  United  States? 

Mr.  Tkach.  Yes. 

Mr,  Arends.  lYliere  and  when  ? 

Mr.  Tkach.  Southern  district  of  New  York.     I  think  it  was  1936. 

Mr.  Arens.  In  the  southern  district  of  New  York  ? 

]\Ir.  Tkach.  Of  New  York. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  a  Comnnmist  when  you  were  naturalized? 

Mr.  Tkach.  I  refuse  to  answer  that  question. 

Mr.  Moulder.  I^et  him  state  his  reasons. 

Mr.  Tkach.  On  the  ground  that  I  might 

Mr.  Needeeman.  Fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Tkach.  Yes. 

Mr.  ]V,IouLDER.  Let  the  witness  answer.  You  invoke  the  fifth 
amendments  ? 

Mr.  Tkach.  Yes. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Claiming  to  answer  the  question  truthfully  might 
incriminate  vou  and  subject  you  to  criminal  prosecution? 

Mr.  Tkach.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  Elizabeth  Bentley  ? 

Mr.  Tkach.  I  refuse  to  answer  that. 

Mr.  Needle3ian.  Just  so  the  record  would  be  clear,  may  I  make  an 
observation  ? 

Mr.  Moulder.  No. 

Mr.  Arens.  Counsel,  your  only  prerogative  is  to  advise  the  client. 

Mr.  Needleman.  I  want  to  ))rotect  his  rights.  When  he  refuses 
to  answer,  it  is  understood  that  it  is  on  the  ground  of  the  fifth  amend- 
inent.     We  have  a  language  difficulty  here. 

Mr.  Moulder.  You  can  confer  with  him.  If  it  is  agreeable,  when 
you  say  you  refuse  to  answer,  we  understand  upon  each  occasion  when- 
ever you  refuse  you  are  claiming  and  invoking  the  protection  of  the 
fifth  amendment:  is  that  so? 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  427 

Mr.  Tkach,  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  Elizabeth  Bentley  ? 

Mr.  Tkach.  I  refuse  to  answer  that  question  on  the  gi'ound  of 
the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Elizabeth  Bentley  swore  before  a  congressional  com- 
mittee (  a  special  subconnnittee  of  the  Judiciary  Committee,  May  13, 
1949)  and  testified  as  follows : 

Question.  By  aliens,  whom  do  yon  refer  toV  Wliat  general  category  of  per- 
sons do  you  mean?     I'ersoiis  born  abroad  and  sent  into  the  country? 

Answer.  That  is  correct ;  people  like  Mr.  Brown,  who  was  never  naturalized ; 
the  editor  of  the  Ukrainian  Daily  News,  which  was  a  Communist  publication, 
Mr.  Tkach,  I  don't  believe  was  ever  naturalized.  In  addition  to  his  duties 
as  being  head  of  the  Ukrainian  Daily  News,  he  was  working  with  the  Russian 
secret  police.  I  worked  with  him,  together  with  Mr.  Golos.  He  found  other 
agents  for  us  among  the  Ukrainians  in  this  country. 

Did  you  work  with  the  Russian  secret  police  in  this  country  ? 

Mr.  Tkach.  No. 

Mr.  Arens.  Was  Elizabeth  Bentley  lying  when  she  said  you  did 
work  with  the  Russian  secret  police  ? 

Mr.  Tkach.  I  refuse  to  answer  that  question. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Your  first  response  was  "No" ;  that  you  did  not. 

Mr.  Tkach.  I  personally  did  not  work  with  any  secret  agency  of 
nobody. 

Mr.  Arens.  With  whom  did  you  work? 

(Witness  consulted  with  counsel.) 

Mr.  Tkach.  I  invoke  the  fifth  amendment  on  that  question. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Just  a  second.  I  think  he  understood  the  word 
"work"  to  mean  "employ."  That  is  what  appears  to  be  the  problem 
here. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  work  with  people  who  did  work  with  the 
Russian  secret  ])olice? 

Mr.  Tkach.  I  refuse  to  answer  that  question.  I  have  no  knowledge 
whatsoever  of  that. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  John  Lautner  ? 

Mr.  Scherer.  Wait  a  minute.     He  says  he  has  no  loiowledge. 

(Witness  consulted  with  counsel.) 

Mr.  Tkach.  On  the  advice  of  my  counsel,  I  invoke  the  fifth  amend- 
ment, and  that  is  that. 

Mr.  Scherer.  You  just  said.  Witness,  that  you  had  no  knowledge 
of  any  activity  on  your  part  with  Russian  secret  police.  Is  that  not 
right?     You  said  you  had  no  knowledge  of  that.     Is  that  right? 

(Witness  consulted  with  counsel.) 

Mr.  Tkach.  That  is  correct.  I  never  personally  worked  with  any- 
body on  any  secret  mission. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Was  Miss  Bentley  telling  the  truth  when  she  told 
that  committee  that  you  were  the  editor  of  the  Ukrainian  Daily  News? 

Mr.  Tkach.  I  invoke  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Was  she  telling  the  truth  when  she  said  that  the 
Ukrainian  Daily  News  was  a  Communist  publication? 

Mr.  Tkach.  Fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Do  you  deny  that  she  was  telling  the  truth  to  that 
committee  when  she  said  that,  in  addition  to  your  duties  as  the  head 
of  the  Ukrainian  Daily  News,  you  were  working  with  the  Russian 
secret  police? 

90121— 57— pt.  6 5 


428  COMIMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

Mr.  Tkach.  Fifth  amendment.  I  never  worked  with  the  secret 
police. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Did  you  work  with  anyone  who  had  contact  with  the 
Russian  secret  police 

Mr.  Tkach.  Fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  ScHEREE.  On  Communist  activities? 

Mr.  Tkach.  Fifth  amendment  I  invoke. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  have  knowledge  of  activities  in  this  country 
of  the  Russian  secret  police  ? 

(Witness  consulted  with  counsel.) 

Mr.  Tkach.  Fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Miss  Bentley  told  that  committee  that  she  worked 
with  you.     Did  you  kno'w  Miss  Bentley  ? 

Mr.  Tkach.  Fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Did  you  know  Mr.  Golos  ?  She  said  you  worked  with 
Mr.  Golos. 

Mr.  Tkach.  Fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Do  you  deny  that  she  was  telling  the  truth  when  she 
said  that  you  worked  with  her  and  Mr.  Golos  ? 

(Witness  consulted  with  counsel.) 

Mr.  Tkach.  Fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Scherer.  You  know  that  Mr.  Golos  was  part  of  the  Russian 
secret  police ;  do  you  not  ? 

(Witness  consulted  with  counsel.) 

Mr.  Tkach.  Fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  work  with  persons  known  by  you  to  be  espio- 
nage agents  even  though  they  may  not  have  been  Russian  espionage 
agents  ? 

(Witness  consulted  with  counsel.) 

Mr.  Tkach.  No. 

Mr.  JMoui.DER.  A^Hiat  do  you  mean  by  work  ?  Probably  the  question 
should  be  phrased  this  way :  Did  you  ever  knowingly  cooperate  with 
espionage  agents? 

Mr.  Tkach.  No. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Did  you  cooperate  with  anv  agents  of  the  Communist 
Party? 

Mr.  Tkach.  Fifth  amendment  I  will  invoke. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Let  us  get  this  straight. 

Do  you  deny  that  you  knew  Elizabeth  Bentley  ? 

Mr.  Needleman.  I  think  he  invoked  the  fifth. 

Mr.  Scherer.  I  think  he  did,  too. 

Mr.  Tkach.  Yes.     Fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Scherer.  What  about  Golos  ?  Isn't  it  a  fact  that  you  did  know 
Golos? 

Mr.  Tkach.  I  invoke  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Did  you  ever  recommend  anybody  to  Mr.  Golos  and 
Miss  Bentley  to  help  them  with  their  work? 

Mr.  Tkach.  Fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Do  you  know  a  man  by  the  name  of  Maurice  ^lalkin  ? 

Mr.  Tkach.  I  invoke  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  He  told  this  committee  that  he  knew  you  as  a  charter 
member  of  the  Communist  Party.     Was  he  lying  or  telling  the  truth? 

Mr,  Tkach.  Fifth  amendment. 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  429 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  John  Lautner? 

Mr.  Tkach.  Fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mv.  Lautner,  would  you  stand  up,  please? 

Look  over  your  left  shoulder,  please,  Mr.  Tkach.  This  man  here 
took  an  oath  before  this  committee  2  or  3  days  ago  and  swore  that  he 
knew  you  as  a  member  of  the  Communist  conspiracy.  Look  him  in 
the  eye  and  deny  it  while  you  are  under  oath.     Would  you  please  ? 

Mr.  Tkach.  Yes.     Fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Areks.  You  were  also,  were  you  not,  on  the  general  executive 
board  of  the  International  Workers  Order? 

Mr.  Tkach.  I  invoke  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  We  would  like  to  display  to  you  a  photostatic  repro- 
duction of  the  executive  board  of  the  International  Workers  Order  as 
released  by  that  organization  in  1940  in  which  your  name  appears  as 
a  member  from  New  York  City.  Please  look  at  that  and  tell  us 
whether  or  not  you  are  accurately  described. 

Mr.  Tkach.  I  invoke  fifth  amendment. 

(Document  marked  "Tkach  Exhibit  No.  2,"  and  retained  in  commit- 
tee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  You  were  president  of  the  Ukrainian- American  Fra- 
ternal Union,  were  you  not  ?  . 

(Witness  consulted  with  counsel.) 

Mr.  Tkach.  I  invoke  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  We  would  like  to  lay  before  you  a  photograph  of  your- 
self and  others  appearing  in  the  program  of  the  Third  American  Slav 
Congress  in  which  you  are  described  as  Michael  Tkach,  president, 
Ukrainian- American  Fraternal  Union  under  date  of  1946.  Please 
look  at  that  document  and  tell  us  whether  or  not  you  are  accurately 
described. 

Mr.  Tkach.  I  invoke  fifth  amendment. 

(Document  marked  "Tkach  Exhibit  No.  3,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Who  was  Michael  (Michele)  Salerno? 

(Witness  consulted  with  counsel.) 

Mr.  Tkach.  Fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Back  in  1948  you  and  a  number  of  other  Communist 
editors  joined  in  a  blast  against  the  deportation  of  Conmiunist  agent 
Michael  Salerno;  did  you  not? 

Mr.  Tkach.  Fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens,  We  would  like  to  lay  before  you  now  a  photostatic  re- 
production of  the  Communist  Daily  Worker  of  October  12,  1948,  in 
which  you  are  listed  as  one  of  a  number  of  editors — 19  in  total — who 
joined  in  this  blast  against  the  Government  because  of  its  deporta- 
tion proceedings  against  Michael  Salerno,  Communist  agent.  Please 
look  at  that  document  and  tell  us  whether  or  not  that  refreshes  your 
recollection. 

Mr.  Tkach.  I  invoke  fifth  amendment. 

(Document  marked  "Tkach  Exhibit  No.  4,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Now  I  would  like  to  invite  your  attention,  please,  Mr. 
Tkach,  to  several  editions  of  the  Ukrainian  Daily  News  which  you 
edit.  First  of  all  I  want  to  ask  if  you  would  be  good  enough  to  help 
this  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities  and  follow  in  that  publica- 
tion, as  we  allude  to  certain  of  the  articles. 


430  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

The  first  article  I  want  to  invite  your  attention  to  is  the  June  4, 1952, 
issue,  page  4,  in  which  the  Ukrainian  Daily  News  attacks  the  United 
States  Government  for  allegedly  using  bacteriological  warfare  in 
Korea. 

Glance  at  page  4  of  your  publication,  if  you  please,  and  tell  this  com- 
mittee if  the  article,  which  Mr.  Bonora  will  point  out  to  you,  does  not, 
in  effect,  charge  the  United  States  Government  with  the  use  of  bacteri- 
ological warfare  in  Korea. 

Mr.  Tkach.  I  invoke  the  fifth  amendment. 

(Document  marked  "Tkach  Exhibit  No.  5,''  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  I  would  like  to  lay  before  you  still  another  edition,  the 
August  21,  1955,  edition  of  the  Ukrainian  Daily  News,  page  4  again, 
in  which  the  article  urges  people  of  Poland  to  return  to  their  home- 
land. Look  at  that  article,  if  vou  please,  on  page  4,  entitled,  "Go 
Back  Home,"  and  tell  this  committee  if  it  is  not  true  that  the  essence 
of  that  article  is  an  appeal  to  the  Polish  nationals  of  this  country  to 
return  to  Poland. 

Mr.  Tkach.  I  invoke  fifth  amendment. 

(Document  marked  "Tkach  Exhibit  No.  6,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Moulder.  In  what  language  is  that  paper  published  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Ukrainian. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Do  you  speak  the  Ukrainian  language  ? 

Mr.  Tkach.  Fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Sciierer.  I  ask  that  you  direct  the  witness  to  answer. 

Mr.  Moi^lder.  The  witness  is  directed  to  answer.  In  so  directing 
you  to  answer  that  question,  the  committee  refuses  to  accept  your 
reasons  for  not  answering,  because  certainly  it  is  most  unreasonable  to 
assume  that  you  might  incriminate  yourself  and  subject  yourself  to 
criminal  prosecution  by  answering  the  question  as  to  whether  or  not 
you  speak  the  Ukrainian  language.  In  so  directing  you,  we  do  it  not 
in  a  spirit  of  threat,  but  to  advise  you  of  the  possible  dangers  you 
might  be  confronted  with  by  refusing  and  being  in  contempt  of 
Congress. 

Mr.  Needleman.  The  question  was.  Did  he  read  it  ? 

Mr.  Moulder.  I  asked  him  the  question  as  to  whether  or  not  he 
could  speak  the  Ukrainian  language,  and  he  invokes  the  fifth  amend- 
ment. 

Mr.  Tkach.  Yes ;  I  do  speak  Ukrainian. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  do  you  read  it  ? 

Mr.  Tkach.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Now,  I  would  like  to  lay  before  you  still  another  edition 
of  your  paper,  Ukrainian  Daily  News,  if  you  will  take  hold  of  it, 
please,  sir,  of  May  7,  1952,  page  4  again.  See  if  this  exact  language 
does  not  appear : 

As  we  know,  the  I'Uited  States  Goverument  denies  any  use  of  the  bacteriological 
weapon  in  Korea.  But  this  denial  does  not  convince  anybody,  nor  does  it  guar- 
antee that  this  terrible  weapon  will  not  be  used  in  the  future,  especially  since, 
along  with  those  denials  by  the  United  States,  alarming  news  about  preparations 
for  use  of  this  terrible  means  of  destruction  were  circulated. 

Is  that  the  essence  of  the  article  on  bacteriological  warfare  in  your 
paper,  the  Ukrainian  Daily  News  of  May  7,  1952,  page  4? 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGAjSTDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  431 

Mr.  Tkach.  From  your  reading  I  could  not  gather  it. 

(Document  marked  "Tkach  Exhibit  No.  7,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Akexs.  Let  us  try  it  slowly. 

Mr.  JVIouLDER.  jNlay  I  suggest  that  we  can  probably  expedite  the 
proceedings.  You  do  have  a  photostatic  copy  of  the  document  there 
before  you  in  the  Ukrainian  language? 

Mr.  Tkach.  Yes. 

Mr.  Moulder.  And  you  can  read  Ukrainian  and  translate  it  into 
English? 

Mr.  Needlemax.  His  English  obviously  is  poor.     You  can  see  that. 

Mr.  Scherer.  I  do  not  think  it  is  as  poor  as  he  indicates. 

Mr.  Needleman.  There  is  no  basis  for  that.  The  man  is  having 
difficulty  with  the  language. 

]Mr.  Moulder.  1  am  interrogating  the  witness,  and  I  want  to  ask  him 
some  questions. 

Is  this  document  written  in  English  or  Ukrainian? 

JVIr.  Tkach.  Ukrainian. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Can  you  translate  it  and  read  it  to  us  in  English? 

Mr.  Tkach.  I  can't  translate  it. 

Mr.  Moulder.  You  can't? 

Mr.  Tkach.  I  can't. 

jNIr.  ]\[ouli)er.  How  long  have  j^ou  been  in  the  journalist  business? 
In  the  beginning  jon  said  you  were  a  journalist. 

Mr.  Tkach.  Yes. 

(Witness  consulted  with  counsel.) 

Mr.  Tkach.  I  don't  know  enough  English  to  translate  the  article 
from  the  Ukrainian  or  from  any  other  language  I  would  know. 

]\Ir.  Moulder.  I  understand  you  have  been  here  now — how  long  in 
the  United  States? 

Mr.  Tkach.  Close  to  40  years. 

Mr.  Scherer.  I  still  say  what  I  said.  This  man  is  pretending  not 
to  know  the  English  language. 

Mr.  Needleman.  I  think  it  is  unjustified.  He  is  obviously  having 
great  difficulty. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Counsel,  you  know  you  are  violating  the  rules  of  this 
committee  right  now. 

Mr.  Xeedleiniax.  T\^ien  Mr.  Scherer  makes  a  statement  reflecting  on 
the  character  and  honesty  of  my  client,  I  think  it  deserves  a  comment. 

Mr.  Moulder.  You  have  been  approximately  40  years  in  the  United 
States? 

Mr.  Tkach.  Yes. 

Mr.  ]\IouLDER.  How  many  years  did  j^ou  wait  before  you  applied  for 
citizenship  ? 

Mr.  Tkach.  About  20. 

Mr.  Moulder.  About  20  years  ? 

Mr.  TiiACH.  Something  like  that. 

Mr.  Moulder.  And  can  you  give  us  the  reasons  why  you  delayed  so 
long  seeking  citizenshi])  ? 

(Witness  consulted  with  counsel.) 

Mr.  Tkach.  I  don't  know  myself  why.  I  couldn't  answer  that 
question. 

Mr.  ISIouLDER.  Proceed. 


432  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA   IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

Mr.  ScHERER.  You  are  the  editor  of  a  newspaper.  Do  you  read  the 
local  newspapers  in  order  to  get  information  to  write  in  this  Ukrainian 
newspaper  ? 

Mr.  Tkach.  I  invoke  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Wait  a  minute.    Do  you  read  local  newspapers? 

Mr.  Needleman.  That  was  a  double  question. 

Mr.  Arens.  Counsel,  you  know  3'^our  sole  duty  is  to  advise  your 
client. 

Mr.  Needleman.  He  has  language  difficulties  and  that  was  a  double 
question.    He  ought  to  be  asked  simple  questions. 

Mr.  Arens.  If  you  do  not  restrain  yourself  I  shall  request  the  com- 
mittee to  have  you  removed  from  the  hearing  room. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Do  you  read  the  local  press  ? 

Mr.  Tkach.  I  read  it.    I  understand  some  of  it,  but  not  all. 

Mr.  Scherer.  You  mean  you  only  understand  some  of  what  you 
read? 

Mr.  Tkach.  Yes.  There  might  be  some  things  I  do  not  understand 
thoroughly.     I  could  guess. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Do  you  read  magazines  ? 

Mr.  Tkach.  Yes.     The  same  is  true  with  magazines. 

Mr.  Scherer.  It  is  a  strange  world  we  live  in. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Proceed. 

Mr.  Aeens.  I  would  like  to  lay  before  you  still  another  copy  of  your 
paper,  the  Ukrainian  Daily  News.  We  have  marked  in  red  the  article 
to  which  I  want  to  direct  your  attention.  It  is  December  19, 1956.  It 
is  entitled,  "Normal  State  Has  Been  Kestored  in  Hungary,"  Would 
you  be  good  enough  to  follow  this  as  I  read  it  in  English  and  tell  the 
committee  whether  or  not  I  am  giving  a  true  and  correct  translation  ? 

Mr.  Needleman".  Would  you  indicate  where  you  are  going  to  start  ? 
It  is  a  long  article. 

Mr.  Arens.  Let  us  start  with  the  second  paragraph. 

We  are  sure  that  the  reactionaries  will  be  very  soon  disappointed. 

Do  you  see  that  Mr.  Tkach  ? 
Mr.  Tkach.  Yes. 
Mr.  Arens  (reading)  : 

We  are  sure  that  the  reactionaries  will  be  very  soon  disappointed.  The 
Hungarian  people,  the  workers  and  the  farmers,  will  use  their  experience  of  the 
past  2  months.  But  not  only  the  Hungarian  workers  and  farmers  have  recog- 
nized what  was  offered  to  them  by  the  western  liberators.  Also  all  those  who 
had  some  objections  against  their  governments  in  the  countries  of  people's  democ- 
racies, have  recognized  that  the  course  suggested  to  them  by  the  West,  leads 
them  to  dead  end,  toward  ruin  and  destruction. 

Then  the  last  paragraph : 

Today  the  Hungarian  people  owe  the  fact  that  they  did  not  fall  under  the 
Fascist  yoke,  to  a  great  degree  to  the  solidarity  of  the  countries  of  people's 
democracies,  and  to  the  Soviet  people  in  the  first  place,  who  do  their  utmost 
in  order  to  prevent  the  restoration  of  the  Fascist  danger  in  those  countries 
which  entered  upon  the  road  of  socialism. 

Is  that  a  true  and  correct  translation  of  the  article  which  I  have 
just  laid  before  you? 

Mr.  Tkach.  As  far  as  the  translation  is  concerned,  I  think  substan- 
tially it  is  correct.  Perhaps  there  is  not  all  the  detail,  but  substan- 
tially it  is  correct. 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  433 

Mr.  Arexs.  Don't  you  feel  ashamed,  as  an  American  citizen,  writing 
that  kind  of  Communist  poison  in  a  publication  wliich  is  dissemmi- 
nated  in  a  land  which  gives  you  protection  under  the  American  flag? 

(Witness  conferred  with  counsel.) 

Mr.  Tkach.  I  invoke  fifth  amendment  on  that  question. 

(Document  marked  ''Tkach  Exhibit  No.  8,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Now  I  would  like  to  invite  your  attention  to  one  more 
article,  an  editorial  m  your  paper,  Ukrainian  Daily  News  of  December 
29, 1955,  Successes  of  the  So^det  Policy  of  Peace. 

Mr.  Needleman.  Where  are  you  reading? 

Mr.  Arens.  Page  4,  the  editorial.  Great  Successes — Great  Defeats. 

Mr.  Scherer.  This  is  an  editorial  written  by  this  witness? 

Mr.  Arens.  It  is  an  editorial  in  the  paper  of  which  he  is  the  editor, 
Successes  of  the  Soviet  Policy  of  Peace. 

Do  you  see  that,  Mr.  Tkach  ? 

Mr.  Tkach.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  tliis  a  true  and  correct  translation  ? 

(Reading:) 

Defeats  on  the  part  of  the  partisans  of  war  and  of  disturbance  of  international 
relations. 

Such  are  the  conclusions  of  the  majority  of  the  American  press  and  of  nearly 
all  Wall  Street  economic  journals. 

The  United  Nations  and  the  countries  of  Asia  and  of  the  Near  East  are  stra- 
tegic points  of  their  examinations. 

Let  us  drop  down  a  paragraph  or  two.  '• 

In  all  political  and  strategic  movements  the  "West  is  checked  by  the  East. 
All  movements  of  the  West  are  suffering  defeats  because  they  basically  depend 
on  military  force,  and  if  not  on  real  military  force  then  on  talks  about  it.  All 
movements  of  the  East  are  accompanied  by  peace  propaganda  which  appeals  to 
the  great  majority  of  the  peoples  of  all  countries. 

Recent  telegrams  from  Moscow  reported  that  the  Government  of  the  Soviet 
Union  proposed  a  10-percent  decrease  of  military  expenditures  as  compared 
with  last  year's  expenses,  to  the  Supreme  Soviet.  But  we  talk  about  the  neces- 
sity of  increasing  the  expenses  for  defense  and  military  aid  to  ou  rallies. 

In  spite  of  all  the  attempts  of  the  "big  press"  to  convince  public  opinion  that 
the  decrease  of  the  expenses  for  war  purposes  by  the  Soviet  Government  is  "not 
a  real  decrease,"  and  that  the  attempts  to  increase  our  own  expenses  for  arma- 
ment is  "not  a  real  increase,"  the  masses  both  in  our  country  and  abroad 
remain  under  the  impression  that,  while  some  organize  military  blocs  and  arm 
themselves,  others  regard  peace  as  the  safest  means  of  security.  In  effect  the 
policy  of  peace  defeats  the  policy  of  war. 

Peoples  want  peace. 

Mr.  Scherer.  There  he  comments  at  length  very  fluently  on  what 
the  American  press  talks  about  these  involved  matters  and  then  he  tells 
us  that  he  can  only  understand  a  part  of  what  he  reads. 

(Document  marked  "Tkach  Exhibit  No.  9,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Needleman.  Wliere  in  that  editorial  does  it  say  he  wrote  it? 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  in  violation  of  the  rules  of  this  connnittee. 
,     Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  counsel  be  admonished. 
_  Mr.  Moulder.  If  counsel  for  witness  repeats  these  bursts  you  will  be 
ejected. 

Mr.  Needleman.  Just  so  I  understand  my  position,  Mr.  Chair- 
man  


434  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

Mr.  Arens.  We  lay  before  you  another  article  from  the  Ukrain- 
ian Daily  News,  your  paper.  It  is  the  issue  of  July  2,  1950.  The 
essence  of  this  article,  "\Vlio  is  responsible  for  the  war  in  Korea?" 
an  editorial,  is  that  the  United  States  Government  is  responsible  for 
the  war  in  Korea;  isn't  that  correct?  Isn't  that  the  essence  of  this 
article  ? 

Mr.  Tkach.  I  could  not  tell  offhand. 

Mr.  Arens.  Let  me  read,  then,  certain  excerpts  from  it.  It  is  a 
rather  long  editorial.  If  I  vary  from  the  essence  of  it,  you  be  sure  to 
correct  me. 

(Reading:) 

In  other  words,  the  war  in  Korea  is  being  waged  with  the  American  Armed 
Forces  on  one  side  and  the  armed  forces  of  the  Koreans  on  the  other  hand.  Tales 
about  participation  of  the  Soviets  in  tliis  war  are  unfounded,  so  much  so  that 
they  begin  to  disappear  even  from  the  pages  of  the  capitalistic  press. 

Then  the  very  last  paragraph  I  would  like  to  invite  to  your  atten- 
tion, the  same  theme  throughout  the  editorial,  but  I  will  not  take 
the  time  of  the  comimittee  to  read  it  all. 

During  the  past  few  days  we  talked  about  the  participation  of  the  Soviets  in 
the  Korean  war.  Even  now  some  of  the  papers  and  radio  commentators  keep 
I'epeating  this  lie.  And  in  reality?  At  the  Korean  theater  of  war  on  one  side 
fight  the  armed  forces  of  the  Korean  i)eople  who  defend  their  independence  and 
on  the  other  hand,  American  Armed  Forces  aided  by  reactionary  groups  of 
Koreans.  Is  it,  therefore,  difficult  to  determine  who  is  responsible  for  the  war 
in  Korea? 

Now,  Mr.  Tkach,  don't  you  feel  ashamed,  don't  you  feel  you  be- 
trayed your  country,  by  writing  that  type  of  material  while  the  boys 
of  this  country  were  out  defending  you  on  the  battlefields  of  Korea? 

]\Ir.  Tkach.  I  invoke  the  fifth  amendment  to  that.  Tliere  is  indica- 
tion that  I  wrote  this  article? 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  deny  that  you  wrote  this  article  ? 

(Witness  consulted  with  counsel.) 

Mr.  Tkach.  I  don't  know. 

(Docmnent  marked  ''Tkach  Exhibit  No.  10,''  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

]\Ir.  Arexs.  Do  you  deny  that  you  are  editor  of  the  paper  in  which 
this  editorial  appears? 

Mr.  Tkach.  Fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  That  was  written  during  the  war. 

Mr.  Arens-  Yes,  sir;  when  the  boys  were  being  shot  in  Korea. 

IVIr.  ScHERER.  Such  an  article  gives  aid  and  comfort  to  the  enemy 
in  Avar. 

Mr.  Arens.  Yes. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  "Treason"  is  defined  by  the  statutes  and  Constitu- 
tion of  the  United  States  as  giving  aid  and  comfort  to  the  enemy 
during  time  of  war.  Then  they  worry  about  me  hurting  the  integrity 
of  this  man. 

I  have  no  further  questions. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  have  just  1  or  2  other  questions,  Mr.  Chairman,  to 
pose  to  the  witness,  if  you  please. 

Have  you  ever  gone  abroad  since  you  came  to  the  United  States  ? 

Mr.  Tkach.  I  invoke  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  did  go  abroad  in  1946 ;  did  you  not  ? 

Mr.  Tkach.  Fifth  amendment. 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  435 

Mr.  Arens.  You  went  abroad  in  1946  to  attend  an  international 
Communist  conference  in  Yui^oslava ;  did  you  not  ? 

Mr.  Tkach.  Fif  til  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  put  it  to  you  as  a  fact  that  you  went  with  a  United 
States  passport  to  attend  an  international  conference  of  Communists 
held  in  Yuo-oslavia,  and  I  ask  you  to  affirm  or  deny  that  fact. 

Mr.  Tkacii.  1  invoke  fifth  ameiidment. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  res])ectful]y  suggest  that  would  con- 
clude the  staif  interrogation  of  this  witness. 

Mr,  Moulder.  All  of  the  documents  referred  to  by  counsel  and 
submitted  to  the  witness  for  identification  and  examination  are  ad- 
mitted in  evidence  as  a  part  of  the  record  by  reference, 

Mr.  Scherer,  do  you  have  any  additional  questions? 

Mr.  SoHERER.  I  have  no  further  questions. 

Mr.  Moulder,  You  are  excused  as  a  witness. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Mr,  Frank  Ilchuk, 

Mr,  Moulder.  Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  you  are 
about  to  give  shall  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and  nothing  but 
the  truth,  so  help  you  God  ? 

Mr.  Ilciiuk.  I  do.  -.    '    . 

TESTIMONY  OF  FRANK  ILCHUK,  ACCOMPANIED  BY  COUNSEL, 
ISADORE  G.  NEEDLEMAN 

Mr,  Arens.  Kindly  identify  yourself  by  name,  residence  and  occu- 
pation. 

Mr.  Ilchuk.  Frank  Ilchuk,  100  Second  Avenue,  N"ew  York  City. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  your  occupation  ? 

Mr.  Ilchuk.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  the  protection 
afforded  me  by  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  appearing  today  in  response  to  a  subpena 
served  upon  you  by  the  House  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities  ? 

Mr,  Ilchuk,  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  represented  by  counsel  ? 

Mr.  Ilchuk,  Yes,  sir, 

Mr.  Needleman,  Isadore  Needleman,  165  Broadway,  Xew  York, 
N.  Y. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Ilchuk,  who  is  the  man  who  preceded  you  on  the 
witness  stand? 

(Witness  consulted  with  counsel.) 

Mr.  Ilciiuk.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  for  the  reason  pre- 
viously stated. 

Mr.  Arens,  He  is  the  editor  of  the  Ukrainian  Daily  News,  Inc.,  of 
which  you  are  the  secretary-treasurer;  isn't  that  true? 

Mr.  Ilchuk.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  put  it  to  you  as  a  fact  and  ask  you  to  affirm  or  deny 
the  fact 

Mr.  Needleman.  The  answer  was  not  completed,  Mr,  Chairman. 

Mr.  Arens,  You  are  secretary-treasurer  of  the  Ukrainian  Daily 
News  Inc,  ? 

Mr,  Ilciiuk,  Would  you  repeat  that  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  I  put  it  to  you  as  a  fact,  and  ask  you  to  affirm  or  deny 
the  fact,  that  you  are  one  of  the  owners  of  the  Ukrainian  Daily  News. 
I  ask  vou  to  affirm  or  denv  that  fact. 


436  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN   THE    UNITED    STATES 

(Witness  consulted  with  counsel.) 

Mr.  Ilchuk.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  the  basis  of  the 
first  and  fifth  amendments. 

Mr.  Arens.  We  lay  before  you  the  thermofax  reproduction  of  the 
statement  required  by  the  postal  laws  filed  by  the  Ukrainian  Daily 
News  in  which  your  name  appears  as  one  of  the  owners  of  the  Ukrain- 
ian Daily  News,  Inc.  Please  look  at  that  document  and  tell  us 
whether  or  not  that  is  a  true  and  accui'ate  description  of  your  status 
with  that  publication. 

(Document  previously  designated  "Tkach  Exhibit  No.  1";  retained 
in  committee  files.) 

Mr.  Needleman.  The  2  questions,  Mr.  Chairman — I  mean  the  an- 
swer to  the  question  asked  just  before  these  last  2  simply  said  he  de- 
clined, and  then  Mr.  Arens  went  on.  I  don't  want  it  to  appear  that  he 
was  declining  without  a  reason. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Very  well.  At  the  appropriate  place  in  the  record 
where  he  declines  to  answer,  you  wish  to  add,  do  you,  that  you  decline 
to  answer  for  the  reason  it  might  tend  to  incriminate  you  ? 

Mr.  Ilchuk.  The  first  and  fifth  amendments. 

Mr.  Moulder.  You  are  invoking  the  protection  of  the  first  and  fifth 
amendments  ? 

Mr.  Ilchuk.  I  decline  to  answer  that  for  the  same  reasons. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  traveled  abroad  ? 

Mr.  Ilchuk.  I  decline  to  answer  for  the  reasons  previously  stated. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  respectfully  suggest,  Mr.  Chairman,  that  the  witness 
be  ordered  and  directed  to  answer  that  question. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  witness  is  so  ordered  and  directed. 

Mr.  Ilchuk.  I  still  decline  to  answer  for  the  reasons  previously 
stated. 

Mr.  Arens.  The  fact  is  that  in  1947  you  did  travel  abroad  as  edu- 
cational director  of  the  Ukrainian- American  Fraternal  Union ;  is  that 
not  correct  ? 

Mr.  Ilchuk.  I  decline  to  answer  for  the  reasons  previously  stated. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  educational  director  of  the  Ukrainian- 
American  Fraternal  Union  ? 

Mr.  Ilchuk.  I  decline  to  answer  for  the  reasons  previously  stated. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  registered  under  the  Foreign  Agents 
Registration  Act  ? 

(Witness  conferred  with  counsel.) 

Mr.  Ilchuk.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  Has  your  paper,  the  Ukrainian  Daily  News,  ever  reg- 
istered under  the  Foreign  Agents  Registration  Act  ? 

Mr.  Ilchuk.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  protection  afforded  me  by 
the  first  and  fifth  amendments. 

Mr.  Arens.  '\'\^iere  are  you  employed  ?  What  is  the  physical  loca- 
tion of  the  establishment  by  which  you  are  employed  ? 

Mr.  Ilchuk.  I  decline  to  answer  that  for  the  reasons  previously 
stated. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  this  moment  a  Communist  ? 

Mr.  Ilchuk.  I  decline  to  answer  for  the  reasons  previously  stated. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Did  you  ask  the  witness  where  he  was  born  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  were  you  born  ? 

Mr.  Ilchuk.  I  was  born  in  the  Ukraine.  At  that  time  it  was  part 
of  Austria-Hungary. 


COMlVrUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN   THE    UNITED    STATES  437 

Mr.  Akens.  Wlien  did  you  come  to  the  United  States  ? 

Mr.  Ilchuic.  1912. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  a  citizen  ? 

Mr.  Ilchuk.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Akens.  When  did  you  become  a  citizen  ? 

(Witness  consulted  with  counsel.) 

Mr.  Ilchuk.  Will  you  repeat  that  last  question  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  When  did  you  become  a  citizen? 

Mr.  Ilchuk.  1919.    I  have  derivative  citizenship. 

Mr.  Arens.  We  would  like  to  lay  before  you  several  exhibits  in 
order  to  economize  on  time.  We  will  lay  before  you  about  3  or  4 
at  a  time,  showing  your  identification  with  each  of  several  organiza- 
tions. The  first  exliibit  I  would  like  to  lay  before  you  is  the  Slavic 
American  of  1947,  in  which  an  article  appears  and  in  which  your 
photograph  appears  as  one  of  those  elected  to  represent  the  New  York 
Youth  Council  at  the  World  Youth  Festival  to  be  held  at  that  time  in 
Prague. 

Look  at  that  one,  if  you  please. 

(Document  marked  "Ilchuk  Exliibit  No.  1,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Also,  would  you  be  good  enough  to  look  at  the  Fraternal 
Outlook  of  June-July  1915,  in  which  you  are  identified  as  a  former 
director  of  the  Ukrainian  Leontovich  Chorus  and  the  IWO  Ukrainian 
American  Section  cultural  director. 

(Document  marked  "Ilchuk  Exhibit  No.  2"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  A  copy  of  the  Communist  Daily  Worker  of  February  2, 
1953,  in  which  you  are  identified  as  conductor  of  the  Ukrainian  Peoples 
Chorus. 

(Document  marked  "Ilchuk  Exhibit  No.  3,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  A  copy  of  the  Daily  Worker  of  July  9,  1948,  in  which 
you  are  identified  as  head  of  the  American-Ukrainian  Society,  IWO. 

(Document  marked  "Ilchuk  Exhibit  No  4,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  A  copy  of  the  Daily  Worker  of  August  10,  1949,  in 
which  you  are  identified  as  one  of  the  leaders  of  a  picket  group  to 
picket  the  trial  of  the  traitors  at  Foley  Square  who  were  convicted 
here  before  Judge  Medina. 

(Document  marked  "Ilchuk  Exhibit  No.  5,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Look  at  each  of  those  exhibits  and  see  if  you  won't  be 
good  enough  while  you  are  under  oath  to  tell  this  committee  whether 
or  not  you  are  accurately  described  in  each  of  those  several  exhibits. 

Mr.  Ilchuk.  In  respect  to  all  of  them  I  refuse  to  answer  the  ques- 
tion for  the  reasons  previously  stated. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  clubs  do  you  belong  to  at  the  present  time  which 
are  not  connected  with  the  Communist  conspiracy  ? 

Mr.  Ilchuk.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  for  reasons  previously 
stated. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  will  con- 
clude the  staff  interrogation  of  this  witness. 

Mr.  Moulder.  All  exhibits  referred  to  by  counsel  and  submitted  to 
the  witness  will  be  made  a  part  of  the  record  by  reference. 


438  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

The  witness  is  excused. 

Mr.  Arens.  The  next  witness  would  be  Mr.  Anthony  Bimba. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  you  are 
about  to  give  shall  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and  nothing  but  the 
truth,  so  help  you  God  ? 

Mr.  Bimba.  I  do. 

TESTIMONY  OF  ANTHONY  BIMBA,  ACCOMPANIED  BY  COUNSEL, 
ISADORE  G.  NEEDLEMAN 

Mr.  Arens.  Kindly  identify  yourself  by  name,  residence,  and  occu- 
pation. 

Mr.  Bimba.  Anthony  Bimba,  9523  114th  Street,  Richmond  Hill, 
N.  Y. ;  occupation,  journalist. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  appearing  today  in  response  to  a  subpena 
served  upon  you  by  the  House  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities? 

Mr.  Bimba.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  represented  by  counsel  'I 

Mr.  Bimba.  Yes. 

Mr.  Needleman.  Isadore  G.  Needleman,  165  Broadway,  New  York 
City. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  are  you  employed  ? 

(Witness  consulted  with  counsel.) 

Mr.  Bimba.  I  invoke  the  protection  of  the  tifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  employed,  are  you  not,  as  editor  of  a  Lithu- 
anian paper  called  Sviesa,  isn't  that  correct? 

Mr.  Bimba.  I  decline  on  the  same  ground. 

Mr.  Arens.  We  lay  before  you  a  thermofax  reproduction  of  a 
statement  required  under  the  postal  laws  filed  by  this  paper,  Sviesa, 
in  which  you  are  identified  as  editor  and  managing  editor  of  the 
paper,  Avhich  is,  according  to  this  document,  owned  and  operated  by 
an  American  Lithuanian  Workers  Literary  Association.  Please  look 
at  that  document  and  tell  this  Committee  on  Un-American  i\.ctivities 
whether  or  not  you  are  accurately  described  therein. 

(Witness  consulted  with  counsel.) 

Mr.  Bimba.  I  invoke  the  protection  of  the  first  and  fifth  amend- 
ments. 

(Document  marked  "Bimba  Exhibit  No.  1,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  were  you  born  and  when? 

(Witness  consulted  with  counsel.) 

Mr.  Bimba.  Lithuania. 

Mr.  Arens.  Wlien? 

Mr.  Bimba.  1894. 

Mr.  Arens.  When  did  vou  come  to  the  United  States  ? 

Mr.  Bimba.  1913. 

Mr.  Arens.  When  did  you  come  for  permanent  residence? 

(No  response.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  a  citizen  of  the  Lhiited  States  ? 

Mr.  Bimba.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  naturalized? 

Mr.  Bimba.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  ^^lien  and  wheie  were  you  naturalized? 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  439 

Mr.  Bemba.  1927. 

Mr.  Arens.  'Where? 

Mr.  BiMBA.  Queens,  New  York. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  a  member  of  the  Communist  conspiracy  when 
you  were  naturalized? 

Mr.  BiMBA.  I  invoke  the  protection  of  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  take  an  oath  to  support  and  defend  the  Consti- 
tution of  the  United  States  against  all  enemies  foreign  and  domestic 
when  you  were  naturalized? 

Mr.  BiMBA.  I  decline. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  tliat  the  witness 
be  ordered  and  directed  to  answer  that  question. 

Mr.  BiMBA.  Yes,  I  did  take  an  oath. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  lie  or  tell  the  truth  when  you  took  that  oath  ? 

Mr.  BiMBA.  I  told  the  truth. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  then  a  member  of  a  conspiratorial  apparatus 
designed  to  destroy  the  Constitution  of  the  United  States  and  over- 
throw the  Government  of  the  United  States  by  force  and  violence? 

Mr.  BiMBA.  I  invoke  the  protection  of  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  now  a  Communist? 

Mr.  BiMBA.  I  decline  on  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  have  been  a  Communist  right  from  the  start ;  have 
you  not? 

Mr.  BiMBA.  I  decline  on  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  want  to  show  you  one  of  the  exhibits  of  the  Workers 
Party  of  America  which  even  antedated  the  Communist  Party  in  the 
United  States,  in  which  you  served  as  a  delegate  of  the  Workers  Party 
many,  many  years  ago  out  in  Chicago. 

Look  at  this  document  and  tell  this  committee  while  you  are  under 
oath  if  you  are  not  accurately  described  there  as  one  of  the  leaders  of 
the  Workers  Party  which  antedated  the  Communist  Party. 

(Witness  examined  document  and  consulted  with  counsel.) 

Mr.  BiMBA.  Fifth  amendment. 

(Document  marked  "Bimba  Exhibit  No.  2,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files. ) 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  a  Marxist  ? 

(Witness  consulted  with  counsel.) 

Mr.  Bimba.  I  decline  on  the  same  ground. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  want  to  read  you  part  of  an  article,  and  I  will  show 
you  the  whole  article  written  by  yourself,  in  The  Communist,  Novem- 
ber 1934,  entitled,  "Dynamite  Against  the  Working  Class,  reviewed 
by  Anthony  Bimba."' 

We  Marxists  have  always  maintained  that  in  a  class  society  all  writers  are 
influenced  by  the  existing  class  forces — 

And  so  forth. 

Look  at  this  article  if  you  please,  sir,  and  tell  this  committee  while 
you  are  under  oath  if  it  is  true  that  you  are  the  author  of  that  article 
appearing  in  the  publication  then  known  as  The  Communist. 

(Witness  exammed  document  and  consulted  with  counsel.) 

Mr.  Bimba.  Fifth  amendment. 

(Document  marked  "Bimba  Exhibit  No.  3,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  been  a  candidate  for  public  office? 


440  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

(Witness  consulted  with  counsel.) 

Mr.  BiMBA.  Fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Abens.  Back  in  1933  you  ran  for  the  supreme  court  of  this 
State  on  the  Communist  Party  ticket ;  did  you  not  ? 

Mr.  Beviba.  Decline  on  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  Arens.  Look  at  this  exhibit,  the  Connnunist  Daily  Worker  of 
September  19, 1933,  in  which  you  are  listed  as  one  of  the  candidates — 
running  for  the  supreme  court — along  with  some  of  the  top-flight 
Communist  agents  in  this  country  of  the  conspiratorial  apparatus,  and 
tell  this  committee  whether  or  not  you  are  accurately  described. 

(Witness  examined  document  and  conferred  with  counsel.) 

Mr.  Bimba.  I  decline  on  the  same  grounds. 

(Document  marked  "Bimba  ExMbit  No.  4,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Your  activities  in  the  Communist  Party  have  been 
somewhat  broader  than  those  in  behalf  of  the  United  States,  have 
they  not  ? 

Mr.  Bimba.  I  decline  on  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  have  a  copy  of  the  Communist  Daily  Worker  of 
January  21,  1936,  telling  about  some  of  your  activities  to  aid  the 
Communists  in  Italy.  The  article  is  headed,  "Communists  in  U.  S. 
Open  Drive  to  Aid  Brother  Party  in  Italy,"  and  tells  about  the  activi- 
ties of  the  Central  Committee  of  the  Communist  Party  of  the  United 
States  in  raising  funds  and  assisting  the  Communist  conspirators  in 
Italy.  Listed  as  part  of  this  conspiratorial  apparatus  which  is  doing 
this  to  destroy  the  free  Christian  world  is  one  A.  Bimba. 

Look  at  this  and  tell  this  committee  while  mider  oath  whether  that 
accurately  describes  that  nefarious  activity. 

(Witness  examined  document  and  consulted  counsel.) 

Mr.  Bimba.  Decline  on  the  same  grounds. 

(Document  marked  "Bimba  Exliibit  No.  5,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  Imow  Manning  Johnson  ? 

Mr.  Bimba.  I  decline  on  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  Arens.  He  identified  you  as  one  of  the  principal  agents  of  the 
conspiratorial  apparatus  of  the  Communist  Party.  Was  he  lying  or 
telling  the  truth  ? 

Mr.  Bimba.  I  decline  on  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  Arens.  This  newspaper  of  yours,  Sviesa,  follows  the  Commu- 
nist Party  line  of  the  Kremlin  without  deviation ;  does  it  not  ? 

Mr.  Bimba.  I  invoke  the  protection  of  the  first  and  fifth  amend- 
ments. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Wliat  is  the  name  of  the  newspaper  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  It  is  a  publication  called  Sviesa  printed  in  the  Lithu- 
anian language. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Do  you  ever  read  that  newspaper  ? 

(Witness  conferred  with  counsel.) 

Mr.  Bimba.  First  and  fifth  amendments. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  would  con- 
clude the  staff  interrogation  of  this  witness. 

Mr.  Moulder.  All  of  the  documents  referred  to  by  counsel  and  sub- 
mitted to  the  witness  for  identification  will  be  admitted  in  evidence 
as  a  part  of  the  record  by  reference. 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  441 

Mr.  ScHERER.  You  were  born  in,  did  you  say,  Russia  ? 

Mr.  BiMBA.  I  was  born  in  Lithuania. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  "What  city? 

Mr.  BiMBA.  Not  a  city ;  a  village. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  "What  was  the  name  of  the  village? 

Mr.  BiMBA.  Uzsieniai. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  How  do  you  spell  that? 

Mr.  BiMBA,  U-z-s-i-e-n-i-a-i. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  When  were  you  naturalized  ? 

Mr.  BiMBA.  1927. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  That  is  all.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  move  that  this  com- 
mittee recommend  to  the  Department  of  Justice  that  the  citizenship  of 
Michael  Tkach,  the  editor  of  the  Ukrainian  Daily  News,  in  whose 
papers  appeared  the  editorials  which  amounted  to  treason,  be  revoked. 

I  also  move  that  this  committee  recommend  to  the  Department  of 
Justice  and  the  Immigration  and  Naturalization  Service  that  the  citi- 
zenship of  this  last  witness  be  revoked. 

That  is  the  only  effective  way  we  are  going  to  deal  with  these  people 
who  come  to  this  country  and  gain  citizenship  and  then  in  time  of  war 
do  what  amounts  to  treason. 

Mr.  Needleman.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  thought  this  committee  reports 
to  Congress. 

Mr.  Moulder,  W^ithout  objection,  it  will  be  so  ordered  and  recom- 
mended by  this  subcommittee.  I  would  suggest,  however,  that  pro- 
cedure be  followed  by  submitting  it  to  the  full  committee  for  the 
recommendation  of  the  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities,  as  you 
suggest.    Is  that  agreeable  ? 

Mr.  Scherer.  Surely. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Roy  Mizara. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  you  are 
about  to  give  shall  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and  nothing  but  the 
truth,  so  help  you  God  ? 

Mr.  MizARA.  I  do. 

TESTIMONY  OF  ROY  MIZARA,  ACCOMPANIED  BY  COUNSEL, 
ISADORE  G.  NEEDLEMAN 

Mr.  Arens.  Kindly  identify  yourself  by  name,  residence,  and  oc- 
cupation. 

Mr.  MizARA.  Roy  Mizara,  journalist. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  your  residence? 

Mr.  MizARA.  35-38  75th  Street,  Jackson  Heights,  N.  Y. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  appearing  today  in  response  to  a  subpena 
served  upon  you  by  tlie  House  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities? 

Mr.  MizARA.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  you  are  represented  by  counsel  ? 

Mr.  Mizara.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  Counsel,  kindly  identify  yourself. 

Mr.  Needleman.  Isadore  G.  Needleman,  165  Broadway,  New  York 
City. 

Mr.  Arens.  Wliere  are  you  employed  ?     I  don't  believe  you  told  us. 

Mr.  MizARA.  I  refuse  to  answer  by  invoking  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  employed  as  editor  and  managing  editor  of  a 
Communist-controlled  paper  by  the  name  of  Laisve;  are  you  not? 


442  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

Mr.  MizARA.  I  refuse  to  answer  on  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  would  like  to  lay  before  you  now  the  statement  of 
ownership  required  by  the  postal  laws  and  a  statement  which  was  filed 
by  this  publication,  in  which  you  are  identified  as  the  editor  and  as  the 
managing  editor.  Please  look  at  these  documents  and  tell  this  com- 
mittee while  you  are  under  oath  whether  or  not  you  are  accurately 
described  therein. 

Mr.  MizARA.  I  decline  to  answer  by  invoking  the  first  and  fifth 
amendments. 

(Documents  marked  "Mizara  Exhibit  No.  1,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Where  were  you  born,  Mr.  Mizara  ? 

Mr.  Mizara.  Lithuania. 

Mr.  Arens.  Wlien  did  you  come  to  the  United  States  ? 

Mr.  Mizara.  1913. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  a  citizen  ? 

Mr.  Mizara.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  SciiERER.  Lithuania  is  part  of  Russia  now  ? 

Mr.  Mizara.  It  used  to  be  part  of  Russia  at  that  time. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Was  it  part  of  Russia  when  you  were  born,  or  now  ? 

Mr.  Mizara.  When  I  was  born. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  It  was  part  of  Russia  then  ? 

Mr.  Mizara.  Yes. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  And  you  were  born  in  Mercin,  Russia,  then  ? 

Mr.  Mizara,  Yes,  sir.    It  is  a  small  town. 

Mr.  SciiERER.  You  were  naturalized  when  ? 

Mr.  Mizara.  1927. 

Mr.  ScnERER.  In  Brooldyn,  N.  Y.  ? 

Mr.  Mizara.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  a  member  of  the  Communist  conspiracy  when 
you  were  naturalized  ? 

Mr.  Mizara.  I  refuse  to  answer  on  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  now  a  Communist  this  moment? 

Mr.  Mizara.  I  refuse  to  answer  on  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  would  like  to  ask  you,  Do  you  read  Lithuanian  ? 

Mr.  Mizara.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  Kindly  be  good  enough  to  follow  me  here  in  your  paper 
while  I  read  excerpts  from  each  of  several  of  your  articles.  The  first 
is  an  article  ajipearing  under  date  of  June  21,  1950. 

Mr.  Moulder.  What  is  the  name  of  this  paper  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Laisve.   What  does  that  mean  ? 

Mr.  INIizARA.  Liberty. 

Mr.  Arens.  Your  paper  stands  for  liberty ;  does  it  ? 

(No  response.) 

Mr,  Arens,  I  am  glad  to  have  that  translation,  that  it  does  stand 
for  liberty,  because,  according  to  some  of  these  translations,  it  stands 
pretty  much  for  the  massacre  of  liberty  and  for  the  Soviet  Union. 
Follow  me  there, 

Mr,  M(^ULDER,  Let  us  get  the  record  clear.  The  document  which 
you  hold  before  you  is  a  photostatic  copy  of  a  newspaper  (June  21, 
1950) ,  and  in  what  language  are  the,  articles  printed  ? 

Mr.  Mizara.  In  Lithuanian. 

Mr.  Moulder.  And  you  can  read  and  write  Lithuanian;  is  that 
correct  ? 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  443 

Mr.  MizARA.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Could  you  point  out  there  the  article  in  the  docu- 
ment which  you  hold  in  your  hand  which  you  want  to  be  read  ?  Could 
you  read  that  to  us  in  English  ? 

jVIr.  Mizara.  I  can't ;  I'm  sorry,  sir. 

Mr.  Moulder.  You  can't  translate  from  Lithuanian  to  English  by 
reading  it  ? 

]\Ir.  SlizARA.  I  can  read  from  English  into  Lithuanian,  because  that 
is  easier.  But  it  is  difficult  for  me  to  translate  correctly  from  Lithu- 
anian into  English. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Then  Mr.  Arens  will  proceed  along  the  lines  he  has 
been  proceeding,  to  read  it  in  English  and  ask  you  whether  it  is 
correct. 

Mr.  xVrens.  Do  you  have  an  article  there,  entitled :  "Voices  for  Peace 
Throughout  the  World"  ? 

Mr.  IVIizARA.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  am  going  to  read  you  2  or  3  paragraphs  from  that. 

It  is  a  happy  event  that  the  solicitation  of  signatures  for  the  Stockholm 
petition  for  peace  is  being  carried  out  on  a  large  scale.  It  has  already  been 
signed  by  several  hundred  thousand  Americans.  Committees  for  peace  have 
been  organized  everywhere.     Lithuanians  must  not  remain  behind  the  others. 

*  *  *  The  solicitation  of  signatures  has  met  with  difficulties  in  our  country. 
Here  the  Government,  the  radio,  and  the  commercial  press  are  unanimously 
condemning  the  supporters  of  peace  and  urge  citizens  not  to  sign  the  peace 
petition.  It  is  surprising  how  many  people  are  treating  this  question  seriously 
and  are  signing  the  peace  petition.  By  this  action,  they  express  their  deepest 
desire  for  peace. 

It  is  not  necessary  to  explain  that  people  in  the  Soviet  Union  are  signing 
the  peace  petitions  by  the  millions.  There  the  situation  is  completely  different : 
The  Government,  the  radio,  and  the  press  are  urging  the  citizens  to  sign  the 
Stockholm  petition. 

Is  that  a  substantially  correct  translation? 

Mr.  Mizara.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  write  that  ? 

Mr.  IVIizara.  The  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  That  appeared  in  your  paper ;  did  it  not  ? 

IVIr.  MizARx\.  Fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Don't  you  have  a  sense  of  disgrace  writing  that  line  of 
the  international  Communist  conspiracy  for  permeation  here  in  this 
country  mider  whose  protection  you  enjoy  the  rights  of  citizenship  ? 

(No  response.) 

Mr.  Moulder.  Do  you  decline  to  answer  that  by  invoking  the  fifth 
amendment? 

Mr.  Mizara.  Yes. 

(Document  marked  "Mizara  Exhibit  No.  2,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Moulder.  How  could  you  possibly  be  incriminated,  or  possibly 
be  subjected  to  criminal  prosecution,  by  promoting  peace  in  the  world 
or  by  signing  a  peace  petition  or  by  encouraging  people  to  support  a 
peace  petition  ? 

Mr.  Mizara.  I  decline  to  answer  for  the  previous  reason. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  want  to  read  you  an  article,  from  your  paper  of  No- 
vember 8,  19.56,  on  the  Hungarian  atrocity  by  the  Soviets.  This  is 
"Regret  and  Reality."    Follow  me  please  while  I  read  this. 

90121—57 — pt.  6 6 


444  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

Let  every  decent  person  ask  himself :  Should  the  Soviet  Army  stationed  there 
[in  Hungary],  seeing  the  horrible  rage  of  the  Fascists,  the  massacres  and  an- 
archy, not  have  interfered? 

Mr.  MizARA.  I  beg  your  pardon.    I  can't  follow  that. 
Mr.  Arens.  This  is  the  paper  of  November  8,  1956;  the  editorial 
entitled  "Regret  and  Reality."    Do  you  see  that  one  ? 
Mr.  MizARA.  That  is  the  headline. 
Mr.  Arens.  Yes. 

Let  every  decent  person  asls  himself:  Should  the  Soviet  Army  stationed  there 
[in  Hungary],  seeing  the  horrible  rage  of  the  Fascists,  the  massacres  and  an- 
archy, not  have  interfered?  If  the  Soviet  Union  had  not  helped,  upon  the 
demand  of  the  Hungarian  Government,  the  Soviet  Union  vpould  have  fallen  into 
the  disfavor  of  all  the  civilized  world.  *  *  * 

It  seems  to  us  that  such  should  be  the  attitude  tovpard  events  in  Hungary. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  that  a  true  and  correct  translation  ? 

Mr.  IVIizARA.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  honestly  believe  that  if  the  Soviet  Union  had 
not  gone  into  Hungary  and  mowed  down  the  innocent  women  and 
children  fighting  for  their  freedom,  the  Soviet  Union  would  have 
fallen  into  the  disfavor  of  all  of  the  civilized  world  ? 

(Witness  consulted  with  counsel.) 

Mr.  MiZARA.  Is  that  a  question? 

Mr.  Arens.  Yes;  it  is  a  question.  You  are  a  citizen  of  the  United 
States.  You  have  the  protection  of  this  flag.  Tell  us  whether  or  not 
you  honestly  believe  that,  if  the  Soviet  Union  had  not  marched  in 
there  with  its  troops  and  mowed  down  those  innocent  people,  it  would 
have  lost  favor  with  the  civilized  world. 

Mr.  MizARA.  I  don't  want  to  discuss  this. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  first  question  should  be,  Did  you  write  the 
article  ? 

Mr.  MiZARA.  I  decline  to  answer,  sir. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Do  you  have  any  knowledge  or  information  concern- 
ing the  article  that  was  read  by  Mr.  Arens? 

Mr.  MiZARA.  Same  answer. 

(Document  marked  "Mizara  Exhibit  No.  3,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  I  want  to  lay  before  you  several  documents.  One 
is  an  edition  of  your  paper  of  May  15,  1952.  Also,  of  June  12,  1952, 
two  of  them,  about  the  massacre  by  the  American  troops  of  the  inno- 
cent prisoners  of  war. 

Mr.  Scherer.  We  were  fighting  in  Korea  at  that  time  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Yes. 

Follow  this  one:  "New  Massacre  of  Prisoners  of  War."  Do  you 
see  that  ? 

Mr.  MizARA.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens  (reading)  : 

What  happened  on  the  island  of  Koje,  in  Korea,  last  Monday  will  shock  not 
only  America  but  the  whole  world.  Never  in  history  has  such  an  event  taken 
place.     More  than  30  prisoners  were  killed,  and  about  150  were  wounded.  *  *  * 

It  has  been  said  that  our  principles  and  our  conscience  do  not  permit  forcing 
the  prisoners  of  war  to  return  to  Communist  countries  against  their  will; 
however,  the  same  principles  in  conscience  permits  us  to  wage  war  against 
prisoners  who  are  imprisoned,  unarmed,  and  confined. 

Is  that  a  true  and  correct  translation  of  that  editorial  in  your 
paper? 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  445 

Mr.  IVIizARA.  I  don't  follow  it  exactly. 

Mr.  Arens.  Let  me  read  the  last  paragraph  to  you  again  very 
carefully : 

It  has  been  said  that  our  principles  and  our  conscience  do  not  permit  forcing 
the  prisoners  of  war  to  return  to  the  Communist  countries  against  their  will; 
however,  the  same  principles  and  conscience  permits  us  to  wage  war  against 
prisoners  who  are  imprisoned,  unarmed,  and  confined. 

Is  that  a  true  and  correct  translation  of  the  editorial  in  your  paper  ? 

Mr.  MiZARA.  Yes. 

(Documents  marked  "Mizara  Exhibit  No.  4,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Moulder.  According  to  your  testimony  you  have  not  admitted 
that  it  is  your  paper,  as  I  understand  it. 

Mr.  Mizara.  Yes. 

Mr.  Needleman.  Mr.  Arens  has  been  doing  that  in  every  question. 

Mr.  Arens.  Now,  Counsel,  don't  start  tangling  with  me. 

Mr.  Needleman.  You  keep  saying  "your"  paper  when  we  have  not 
said  so. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Let  us  proceed. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  would  like  to  invite  your  attention  to  one  more.  It  is 
an  editorial  appearing  in  Laisve  of  February  9,  1952,  entitled,  "War 
Came  to  an  End."    Do  you  follow  me  ? 

Mr.  Mizarx\.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens  (reading)  : 

A  cold  war  started.  In  our  country  a  campaign  to  denounce  the  Soviet  Union, 
our  most  powerful  ally  during  the  war,  began  *  *  * 

"Witnesses"  with  masks  were  called,  and  they  said  that  they  had  seen  Com- 
munists massacre  Poles  in  the  forest  of  Katyn  ! 

All  this  "investigation"  is  nothing  but  a  farce.  No  decent  man  believes  or 
will  believe  it.  But  for  those  who  want  to  influence  public  opinion  against  the 
Soviet  Union,  and  favor  hangmen  and  Nazis,  the  goal  justifies  the  means. 

Is  that  a  true  and  correct  translation  of  that  editorial  ? 

Mr.  Mizara.  More  or  less. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  it  substantially  correct  ? 

Mr.  Mizara.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  write  it! 

Mr.  Mizara.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  same  grounds. 

(Document  marked  "Mizara  Exhibit  No.  5,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Another  one  I  would  like  to  invite  to  your  attention — 
June  12,  1951,  in  your  paper,  Laisve.  "Who  is  Afraid  of  Whom?" 
is  the  title  of  this  editorial.   Do  you  see  it  ? 

Mr.  Mizara.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens  (reading)  : 

George  Sokolsliy,  of  the  Hearst  press,  published  the  following  in  his  column 
a  few  days  ago : 

"The  United  Nations  fears  Soviet  Russia.  It  appears  from  the  testimony  be- 
fore the  Russell  committee  that  the  United  States  also  feai-s  Soviet  Russia  *  *  *" 

Everybody  knows  very  well  that  the  Soviet  Union  has  not  attacked  and  will 
not  attack  the  United  States.  The  Soviet  Union  is  anxious  for  peace,  but  not 
for  war.  The  people  of  the  Soviet  Union  are  concerned  for,  and  are  devoted  to, 
the  cause  of  peace  and  the  prosperity  of  their  country.  Neither  the  Government 
of  the  Soviet  Union,  nor  its  press  or  radio,  has  ever  threatened  the  United 
States  with  atom  bombs  or  war. 

Then,  why  should  the  American  people  be  afraid  of  the  Soviet  Union? 


446  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

It  is  true  that  the  Soviet  Union  should  be  afraid  of  the  United  States  because 
provocateurs  in  this  country  are  threatening  daily  through  the  press  and  the- 
radio  to  completely  destroy  one  or  another  Soviet  city  vpith  an  atom  bomb  and 
other  weapons. 

Is  that  a  substantially  correct  translation  of  the  editorial  appearing 
in  Laisve? 

Mr.  MizARA.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  write  it? 

Mr.  ]\IizARA.  I  refuse  to  answer  on  the  same  grounds. 

(Document  marked  "Mizara  Exhibit  No.  6,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  We  have  others.  We  will  use  only  a  few  more  and 
that  will  be  all,  Mr.  Chairman,  that  we  want  to  submit  for  tliis 
record  because  I  think  the  line  is  pretty  clear  here. 

This  is  a  translation  from  Laisve.  You  say  Laisve  stands  for  lib- 
erty? 

Mr.  MizARA.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Arens.  November  21,  1951.  You  see  "The  American  Jewish 
Committee"  ? 

Mr.  MizARA.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens  (reading)  : 

The  American  Jewish  Committee  a  few  days  ago  published  a  statement  con- 
demning the  Soviet  Union  for  "persecution  of  Jews"  living  in  the  Soviet  Repub- 
lics. 

It  is  evident  that  the  accusations  of  the  Jewish  Committee  are  without  any 
foundation.  Anyone  with  any  knowledge  knows  well  that  Jews  in  the  Soviet 
Union  have  equal  rights  with  other  nations ;  there  is  no  place  there  for  anti- 
Semitism. 

Is  that  a  true  and  correct  translation  ? 

Mr.  MizAKA.  With  the  exception  that  this  paragraph  was  not  trans- 
lated fully. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  complete  the  translation.  That  is  the  only  transla- 
tion we  have  from  the  experts  in  the  Library  of  Congress  who 
translated  this  for  us. 

Mr.  Mizara.  If  I  am  incorrect,  please  excuse  me,  but  I  will  try  to 
translate. 

Jewish  scientists,  Jewish  articles,  Jewish  writers,  and  Jewish  other  great 
people  there  have  equal  rights  as  other  nationalities. 

Mr.  Arens.  That  is  in  the  Soviet  Union  ? 

Mr.  Mizara.  That  is  the  end  of  the  paragraph,  sir. 

(Document  marked  "Mizara  Exhibit  No.  7,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files. 

Mr.  Arens.  Thank  you.  I  have  a  copy  of  the  Communist  Daily 
Worker  of  August  7,  1929,  showing  you  as  a  candidate  of  the  Com- 
munist Party  in  the  election  here  for  State  assembly.  Please  look 
at  that  document,  as  I  display  it  to  you,  and  tell  this  committee 
whether  or  not  you  are  accurately  described  as  one  of  the  candidates  of 
the  Communist  Party  here. 

Mr.  Scherer.  What  year  was  that  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  1929,  August  7. 

Would  you  kindly  tell  us  whether  or  not  j^ou  are  accurately  de- 
scribed ? 

Mr.  Mizara.  I  refuse  to  answer  on  the  same  STOunds. 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  447 

(Document  marked  "Mizara  Exhibit  No.  8,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  I  ^A'ould  like  to  display  to  you  another  document  in 
which  you  are  shown  to  be  one  of  the  ringleaders  of  the  Workers  Party 
of  America,  which  even  antedated  the  Communist  Party  and  out  of 
which  the  Communist  Party  emerged.  Please  look  at  this — The  Sec- 
ond Year  of  the  Workers  Party  of  America — in  which  your  name  ap- 
pears as  one  of  the  delegates :  lloy  Mizara,  of  the  Polish  Federation. 

Mr.  Moulder.  ^AHiat  year  was  that? 

Mr.  BoNORA.  The  1024  convention  of  the  party. 

(Witness  conferred  with  counsel.) 

Mr.  Moulder.  What  is  your  response? 

Mr.  Mizara.    I  refuse  to  answer  on  the  same  grounds. 

(Document  marked  "Mizara  Exhibit  No.  9,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  We  have  other  documents  along  this  same  line  here  but 
I  realize  the  press  of  time  today,  Mr.  Chairman,  and  I  believe  we  have 
made  the  record  clear  on  this  witness'  background  and  activities. 

Mr.  Moulder.  All  of  the  documents  referred  to  by  counsel  and  sub- 
mitted to  the  witness  for  examination,  together  with  the  translations 
read  by  counsel,  will  be  admitted  in  evidence  as  a  part  of  the  record 
by  reference. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Mr.  ]\[izara,  in  your  newspaper,  as  has  been  read  to 
us,  you  approve  the  action  of  Russia  in  Plungary ;  then  I  assume  that 
you  have  not  severed  your  connections  with  the  Communist  Party  since 
the  atrocity  by  the  Communists  in  Hungary,  is  that  right? 

Mr.  MizARA.  I  refuse  to  answer  on  the  same  grounds,  sir. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  The  fact  is  that  you  are  still  a  member  of  the  party 
today,  is  it  not? 

Mr.  Mizara.  I  refuse  to  answer  on  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  And  that  your  newspaper,  as  lias  been  demonstrated 
to  us  here  today,  is  daily  promoting  the  Russian  and  Communist  line 
in  regard  to  all  of  these  matters. 

Mr.  Mizara.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  same  grounds,  sir. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Do  you  have  any  connections  today  with  any  people 
dn  Russia? 

Mr.  Mizara.  I  decline  to  answer,  sir,  on  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Have  you  been  abroad  in  the  last  10  years? 

Mr.  Mizara.  I  decline  to  answer,  sir,  on  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Have  you  ever  been  back  to  Russia? 

Mr.  Mizara.  I  decline  to  answer,  sir,  on  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  Scherer.  I  have  no  further  questions. 

Mr.  jSIoulder.  Are  you  married? 

Mr.  IMizARA.  Yes. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Do  you  have  a  family? 

Mr.  Mizara.  No. 

Mr.  Moulder.  I  was  going  to  ask  if  any  members  of  your  family 
■were  in  the  armed  services  in  the  last  war. 

You  are  excused  as  a  witness. 

The  committee  will  stand  in  recess  for  a  period  of  5  minutes. 

(Thereupon,  a  brief  recess  was  taken.) 

(Committee  members  present  after  the  recess  were:  Representa- 
tives Moulder  and  Scherer.) 


448  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  committee  will  be  in  order. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  David  Krinkin. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  you  are 
about  to  give  shall  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and  nothing  but  the 
truth,  so  help  you  God? 

Mr.  Krinkin.  I  do. 

TESTIMONY  OP  DAVID  Z.  KKINKIN,  ACCOMPANIED  BY  COUNSEL, 
ISADORE  G.  NEEDLEMAN 

Mr.  Arens.  Kindly  identify  yourself  by  name,  residence,  and  occu- 
pation. 

Mr.  Krinkin.  David  Krinkin  is  my  name.    Occupation,  journalist. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  do  you  live? 

Mr.  Krinkin.  84  Horatio  Street,  New  York  City. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  appearing  today  in  response  to  a  subpena  which 
was  served  upon  you  by  the  House  Committee  on  Un-American  Ac- 
tivities ? 

Ml'.  Krinkin.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  represented  by  counsel  ? 

Mr.  Krinkin.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Counsel  kindly  identify  yourself. 

Mr.  Needleisian.  Isadore  G.  Needleman,  165  Broadway,  New  York, 
N.Y. 

Mr.  Arens.  Wliere  are  you  employed  ? 

Mr.  Krinkin.  Fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Let  us  clarify  the  record.  Do  I  understand  you  cor- 
rectly when  you  say,  in  response,  you  invoke  the  privileges  under  the 
fifth  amendment  in  declining  to  answer  ?  Is  that  your  response  now 
to  his  question  ? 

Mr.  Krinkin.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  employed  and  you  are  the  editor  of  Kussky 
Golos ;  are  you  not  ? 

Mr.  Krinkin.  Fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Moulder.  To  clarify  the  record,  you  are  claiming  the  privilege 
under  the  fifth  amendment.  You  decline  to  answer  for  the  same  rea- 
sons you  might  say  to  expedite  the  hearings. 

Mr.  Krinkin.  The  same  reason. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  have  here,  and  I  will  display  to  you  in  just  an  instant, 
a  copy  of  the  statement  of  ownership  required  by  the  postal  laws  and 
filed  by  the  Russky  Golos  Publishing  Corp.  under  date  of  October  1, 
1956,  in  which  David  Z.  Krinkin  is  identified  as  editor  of  the  Russky 
Golos.  Please  look  at  that  statement  and  tell  us  whether  or  not  you 
are  accurately  described  in  that  document. 

(Witness  consulted  with  counsel.) 

Mr.  Krinkin.  Decline  on  the  first  amendment  and  fifth. 

(Docmnent  marked  "Krinkin  Exhibit  No.  1,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  and  when  were  you  born  ? 

Mr.  Krinkin.  Where  I  was  born  i    Russia. 

Mr.  Arens.  When  ? 

Ml-.  Krinkin.  1890. 

Mr.  Arens.  Wlien  did  you  come  to  the  United  States  ? 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  449 

Mr.  Krinkin.  1914, 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  a  citizen  ? 

Mr.  Krinkin.  I  am ;  naturalized. 

Mr.  Arens.  When  were  you  naturalized  ? 

Mr.  Krinkin.  In  1920. 

Mr.  Arens.  Wliere? 

Mr.  Krinkin.  Bronx  Supreme  Court. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  a  Communist  when  you  were  naturalized  ? 

Mr.  Krinkin.  Fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  read  Russian  ? 

Mr.  Krinkin.  I  do. 

Mr.  Arens.  Would  you  be  good  enough  to  follow  me  here  in  this 
paper,  Russky  Golos,  this  editorial  I  am  going  to  read,  of  December 
16,  1956,  about  the  Hungarian  Revolution,  as  reported  in  your  paper. 

Mr.  Moulder.  May  I  ask  a  question  ? 

You  hold  in  your  hands  a  photostatic  copy  of  a  document? 

Mr.  IvRiNKiN.  Yes. 

Mr.  Moulder.  In  what  language  is  it  printed  ? 

Mr.  Krinkin.  What  language?     That  is  Russian. 

Mr.  Moulder,  Can  you  read  the  Russian  language  and  translate  it 
into  English  at  the  time  you  are  reading  it  ? 

Mr.  ICrinkin.  Could  I  read  the  Russian  language  as  well  as  the 
English? 

Mr.  Moulder.  Can  you  read  that  article  to  us  that  counsel  refers  to 
you,  in  English  ? 

Mr.  Krinkin.  You  want  me  to  read  that  article  ? 

Mr.  Moulder.  In  English,  if  you  can. 

Mr.  KJRiNKiN.  I  could. 

Mr.  Arens.  Then  would  you  be  good  enough  to  translate  it  for  us? 
Do  you  see  the  article  about.  The  Plans  of  Reactionary  Forces  ? 

Mr.  IvRiNKiN.  This  article  is  called  The  Plan  of  Reaction. 

Mr.  Arens.  Read  it  loud,  please. 

Mr,  Krinkin.  In  Russian  ? 
-    Mr.  Arens.  No,  in  English. 

Mr,  Krinkin,  That  would  take  some  time.  It  would  not  be  as 
quickly. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Proceed. 

Mr.  Arens.  Let  me  read  it  in  English  and  you  follow  in  Russian. 

*  *  *  The  events  in  Hungary  throw  a  clear  light  on  how  American  organizers 
of  subversive  work  operate.  American  agents  intensitied  their  subversive  work 
just  at  the  time  that  the  Hungarian  Government  undertook  a  new  policy  and 
began  to  undo  previously  committed  errors.  If  it  had  not  been  for  American  in- 
tervention in  Hungary,  changes  would  have  been  made  which  would  have  cor- 
responded to  the  interests  and  demands  of  the  Hungarian  people.  Hungary 
could  have  taken  the  same  road  as  Poland,  avoiding  catastrophic  shocks,  but  the 
experience  of  Hungary  clearly  shows  that  in  their  drive  to  weaken  the  might  of 
the  Soviet  Union  and  the  whole  Socialist  camp,  the  rulers  in  AVashiugton  are 
ready  to  use  all  means  at  their  command,  without  concern  for  the  results  in 
the  countries  to  which  they  are  supposedly  bringing  "liberation."  *  *  * 

Is  that  a  true  and  correct  translation  ? 

Mr,  Ivrinklin,  The  translation  is  true. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  write  this  ? 

Mr,  Kjiinkin.  No, 

Mr,  Arens.  Who  wrote  it  ? 

Mr.  Krinkin.  This  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  fifth  amendment. 


450  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

Mr.  Arens.  Was  it  written  under  your  supervision  ? 

Mr.  Keinkhst.  I  decline  to  answer. 

Mr.  Arens.  Was  it  written  in  Moscow  and  then  put  in  your  paper 
here  ? 

Mr.  Krinkin.  I  decline  to  answer  this  on  the  fifth  amendment. 

(Document  marked  "Krinkin  Exhibit  No.  2,''  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  xA.RENS.  Wliat  does  Eussky  Golos  mean  ?  How  do  you  translate 
that  title? 

Mr.  Krinkin.  Russky  Golos  means  Russian  Voice. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  It  certainly  is. 

Mr.  Krinkin.  Russian  Voice. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Can  you  tell  us  approximately  how  many  people 
there  are  in  this  country  who  were  born  in  Russia  ? 

Mr.  Krinkin.  I  was  born  in  Russia. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Can  you  tell  us  about  how  many  people  there  are  m 
this  country  who  were  born  in  Russia  ? 

Mr.  Krinkin.  I  have  no  idea. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Can  you  give  us  approximately  how  many  people  in 
this  country  can  read  the  Russian  language  ? 

Mr.  Krinkin.  I  have  no  idea. 

Mr.  Scherer.  What  is  the  circulation  of  that  paper  of  yours? 

Mr.  Krinkin.  Fifth  amendment.     I  invoke  my  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Did  you  understand  my  question? 

Mr.  Krinkin.  I  do  understand  your  question. 

Mr.  Scherer.  I  ask  that  you  direct  the  witness  to  answer  the  ques- 
tion as  to  the  circulation  of  this  paper.  How  could  that  incriminate 
liim? 

Mr.  INIouLDER.  The  witness  is  directed  to  answer. 

(Witness  consulted  with  counsel.) 

Mr.  Krinkin.  I  invoke  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Moulder.  We  want  to  make  it  clear  to  you  that  the  committee 
does  not  accept  your  reasons  for  refusing  to  answer,  and  you  are  di- 
rected to  answer  l^ecause  of  the  possible  dangers  of  being  guilty  of  con- 
tempt of  Congress. 

Mr.  IvRiNKTN.  I  still  insist  upon  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Do  you  know  the  circulation  of  the  paper  ? 

Mr.  Krinkin.  I  invoke  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Scherer.  It  is  obvious  to  me  that  this  witness  is  in  contempt. 
How  could  that  possibly  incriminate  you  to  say  whether  or  not  you 
know  the  circulation  of  this  paper?  What  did  you  say  the  name  of 
the  paper  was? 

Mr.  Krinkin.  The  name  of  the  paper  that  I  read  here  is  Russky 
Golos. 

]\Ir.  ]\Ioulder.  You  may  proceed. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  would  like  to  lay  before  you  another  copy  of  your 
paper,  the  Russky  Golos,  of  September  16,  1951,  page  4,  and  invite 
your  attention  to  the  editorial,  or  the  article  entitled  "The  laiited 
States  and  the  Hopes  of  the  People  of  Japan." 

Do  you  see  that  article,  or  editorial  ? 

Mr.  Krinkin.  I  see  it  here ;  yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  that  an  editorial  or  article?  I  cannot  tell  from  the 
translation. 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGAXDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  451 

Mr.  Krinkix.  Do  vou  mind  if  von  read  the  translation  as  I  follow 
it?  ^  ' 

Mr.  Arexs.  I  will  do  that.  I  want  to  know  whether  it  is  an  edi- 
torial or  an  article.  What  is  it?  You  have  it  there  in  Russian,  You 
can  read  Russian  and  I  can't. 

Mr.  KRIX'^KIx^  That  seems  to  be  an  article. 

Mr.  Arexs,  I  would  like  to  read  it  to  you  and  you  follow, 

Mr.  Krixkix.  O.  K. 

Mr.  Arens.  If  you  please,  sir. 

In  the  treaty  just  concluded  between  the  United  States  and  Japan,  there  is 
a  special  provision  which  should  cause  particular  alarm  for  the  people  of 
America. 

The  United  States  is  undertaking  the  task  of  crushing  popular  movements 
within  Japan. 

Such  a  circumstance  not  only  violates  all  the  principles  of  noninterference 
in  the  internal  affairs  of  another  nation,  but  tramples  iipon  the  traditions  of 
the  United  States  itself,  traditions  which  were  born  in  the  storm  of  a  people's 
liberation  movement,  and  makes  the  country  an  international  policeman. 

One  cannot  say  that  such  a  situation  is  entirely  new  for  the  United  States. 
Since  the  announcement  of  the  '•Truman  Doctrine,"  the  United  States  has  more 
than  once  undertaken  to  assist  reactionaries  against  the  people.  It  was  thus 
in  Greece,  then  in  China,  Indonesia,  and  in  Vietnam.  But  as  far  back  as  the 
creation  of  the  Atlantic  Alliance,  a  similar  "police  provision"  was  shamefully 
hidden  and  masked  by  many  provisions.  And  at  the  start  of  the  Korean  war, 
President  Truman  started  to  call  the  military  operation  a  "police  action,"  but 
soon  preferred  to  hide  under  the  shameful  mask  of  carrying  out  an  international 
decision  of  the  United  Nations. 

For  the  first  time,  in  the  treaty  with  Japan,  the  United  States  of  America 
openly  undertakes  without  any  international  pretexts  the  function  of  the  suh- 
duer  of  people's  movements  against  their  national  oppressors.  *  *  * 

Is  that  a  true  and  correct  translation  ? 

Mr.  Krixkix,  I  think  it  is. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Did  you  write  it  ? 

Mr.  Krix^kix-^,  No, 

Mr,  Arex^s.  Was  it  published  in  your  paper? 

Mr.  Krix^kix'.  Fifth  amendment, 

Mr.  Arex^s,  Do  you  Iniow  who  wrote  it? 

Mr.  Krix'kix.  Fifth  amendment, 

(Document  marked  "Krinkin  Exhibit  No,  3,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arexs.  I  want  to  display  to  you  certain  documents. 

The  first  is  a  document,  by  its  face  issued  by  the  New  York  State 
Committee  of  the  Communist  Party  in  September  1930,  telling  all 
about  the  Communist  Party,  and  calling  upon  the  people  to  join.  It 
has  the  hammer  and  sickle  here.  Listing  a  number  of  people  on  behalf 
of  the  Communist  Party  who  are  issuing  this  statement,  including  one 
D.  Krinkin. 

Look  at  that  document  and  tell  us  whether  or  not  you  are  accurately 
described  there. 

(Witness  examined  document  and  consulted  counsel,) 

Mr.  Krinkin.  Fifth  amendment. 

(Document  marked  "Krinkin  Exhibit  No.  4,"  and  retained  in 
cominittee  files.) 

Mr.  Arens,  Now  I  want  to  display  to  you  2  or  3  other  documents. 

The  first  is  a  photostatic  reproduction  of  the  Communist  Daily 
Worker  of  June  7,  1949,  in  which  you  are  listed,  among  others,  in 
protesting  the  jailing  of  the  traitors  who  were  convicted  in  Foley 
Square. 


452  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

The  next  one  is  an  article  of  the  Communist  Daily  Worker  of 
October  12,  1948,  in  which  you  are  listed  as  editor  of  Kussky  Golos, 
joining  with  a  number  of  other  Communist  editors  in  attacking  de- 
portation of  a  Communist  agent. 

Mr.  Krinkin.  Fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Needleman.  Wait,  he  will  give  them  all  to  you. 

Mr.  Arens.  The  last  that  I  will  display  to  you  now  is  a  photostatic 
reproduction  of 

Mr.  Krinkin.  Fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens  (continuing).  An  article  which  states  you  were  address- 
ing a  group  on  behalf  of  the  Rosenbergs ;  (Daily  Worker,  October  27, 
1952,  p.  8)  Dr.  David  Krinkin,  editor  of  the  Russian  newspaper, 
Russky  Golos. 

Please  look  at  those  exhibits  and  tell  this  committee  while  you  are 
under  oath  whether  or  not  you  are  accurately  described  therein. 

Mr.  Krinkin.  Fifth  amendment. 

(Documents  marked  "Krinkin  Exhibits  Nos.  5,  6,  and  7,"  respec- 
tively, and  retained  in  committee  files. ) 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  your  paper  in  truth  and  in  fact  an  arm  of  the  inter- 
national propaganda  machine  of  the  Kremlin  ? 

Mr.  Krinkin.  Fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Akens.  I  respectfully  suggest,  Mr.  Chairman,  that  would  con- 
clude the  staff  interrogation  of  this  witness. 

Mr.  Moulder.  All  the  documents  referred  to  by  counsel  and  sub- 
mitted to  the  witness  for  examination  are  admitted  in  evidence  as  a 
part  of  tlie  record  by  reference. 

Are  there  any  questions,  Mr.  Scherer  ? 

Mr.  Scherer.  No. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  witness  is  excused. 

Mr.  Arens.  The  next  witness  is  Samuel  Nikolauk. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  you  are 
about  to  give  shall  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and  nothing  but  the 
truth,  so  help  you  God  ? 

Mr.  NiKOLAUK.  I  do. 

TESTIMONY  OF  SAMUEL  J.  NIKOLAUK,  ACCOMPANIED  BY  COUNSEL, 
ISADOEE  G.  NEEDLEMAN 

Mr.  Arens.  Please  identify  yourself  by  name,  residence,  and  occu- 
pation. 

Mr.  NiKOLAUK.  Samuel  J.  Nikolauk,  2117  24th  Avenue,  Astoria. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  your  occupation  ? 

Mr.  Nikolauk.  A  newspaperman. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  the  man  who  just  left  the  stand  ? 

Mr.  Nikolauk.  Fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  appearing  today  in  response  to  a  subpena  which 
was  served  upon  joii  by  the  House  Committee  on  Un-American  Activi- 
ties? 

Mr.  Nikolauk.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  you  are  represented  by  counsel  ? 

Mr.  Nikolauk.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Counsel  kindly  identify  yourself. 

Mr.  Needleman.  Isadore  G.  Needleman,  165  Broadway,  New  York, 
N.Y. 


COIVIMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  453 

Mr.  Arens.  Who  was  the  man  who  just  left  the  stand?  I  don't 
believe  you  told  us. 

Mr.  NiKOLAUK.  I  invoked  the  fifth  amendment  on  that. 

Mr.  Arens.  He  is  the  editor  of  the  paper,  Kussky  Golos,  of  which 
you  are  one  of  the  officials ;  is  he  not  ? 

Mr.  NiKOLAUK.  Fifth  amendment  to  that. 

Mr.  Arens.  He  is  the  editor  of  Russky  Golos,  of  which  you  are  one 
of  the  officials;  is  he  not? 

papers  in  which  the  Russky  Golos  corporation  makes  certain  adjust- 
ment in  the  stock  structure  of  the  company,  which  you  signed  as  secre- 
tary of  the  Russky  Golos  Publishing  Corp.  Please  look  at  this  docu- 
ment and,  if  you  will  be  good  enough,  identify  your  own  signature 
there  as  secretary  of  the  Russky  Golos  Publishing  Corp.,  which  pub- 
lishes the  newspaper,  Russky  Golos. 

Mr.  NiKOLAUK.  Fifth  amendment. 

(Document  previously  identified  as  "Bayer  Exhibit  No.  1,"  and 
retained  in  committee  files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  now  a  member  of  the  Communist  conspiracy  ? 

Mr.  NiKOLAUK.  I  invoke  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Wliere  was  this  witness  born  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Wliere  were  you  born  ? 

Mr.  NiKOLAUK.  In  Russia. 

Mr.  Arens.  Wlien? 

Mr.  NiKOLAUK.  1895. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  How  many  witnesses  have  we  had  here  who  were  born 
in  Russia,  Lithuania,  or  part  of  Russia;  five  or  six? 

Mr.  Arens.  I  would  say  at  least  that  number. 

When  did  you  come  to  the  United  States  ? 

Mr.  NiKOLAUK.  1912. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  a  citizen  of  this  country? 

Mr.  NiKOLAUK.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  By  naturalization? 

Mr.  NiKOLAUK.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  "\Yliere  and  when  were  you  naturalized? 

Mr.  NiKOLAUK.  1919,  January  14,  in  Atlanta,  Ga. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  a  member  of  the  Communist  conspiracy  when 
you  were  naturalized? 

Mr.  NiKOLAUK.  Fifth  amendment  to  that. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  now  a  member  of  the  Communist  conspiracy  ? 

Mr.  NiKOLAUK.  Fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  We  would  like  to  display  to  you  two  or  three  documents, 
Mr.  Nikolauk. 

The  first  is  a  publication  of  the  Fraternal  Outlook,  published  by 
the  International  Workers  Order,  "Brother  Sam  Nikolauk,"  identified 
here  as  president  of  the  National  Committee  of  the  American  Russian 
Fraternal  Society,  IWO. 

Please  look  at  this  and  tell  the  committee  while  you  are  under  oath 
whether  or  not  you  are  accurately  described  there  as  president  of  the 
National  Committee  of  the  American  Russian  Fraternal  Society,  IWO. 

(Witness  examined  document  and  conferred  with  counsel.) 

Mr.  Nikolauk.  I  invoke  the  fifth  amendment  to  that. 

(Document  marked  "Nikolauk  Exhibit  No.  1,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 


454  COMJVIUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

Mr.  Arens.  Yoli  are  also  one  of  the  leaders  of  the  American  Slav 
Congress  ? 

Mr.  NiKOLAuK.  I  invoke  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Look  at  this  docnment,  if  yon  please,  the  Communist 
Daily  Worker  (May  18,  1950,  p.  2)  in  which  you  are  so  identified  in 
1950,  as  one  of  the  leaders  of  the  American  Slav  Congi-ess. 

Mr.  NiKOEAUK.  I  invoke  the  fifth  amendment  to  that. 

(Document  marked  ""Xikolauk  Exhibit  Xo.  2,"'  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Who  is  Theodore  Bayer  ? 

]Mr.  NiKOLAUN.  I  invoke  the  fifth  amendment  to  that. 

Mr.  Arens.  He  is  president  of  Eusskj'  Golos;  is  he  not  1 

Mr.  NiKOLAUK.  Fifth  amendment  to  that. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  a  man  by  tlie  name  of  John  Lautner? 

Mr.  NiKOLAUK.  I  never  met  him. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Lautner.  would  you  stand?  Would  you  look  over 
your  left  shoulder  and  see  if  you  recofrnize  this  man  ? 

Mr.  NiKOLAUK.  I  do  not  recognize  him. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  do  not  recognize  him  ? 

Mr.  NiKOLAUK.  No. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  seen  him  before  ? 

Mr.  NiKOLxVUK.  I  don't  remember. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Lautner,  would  you  step  forward  ? 

TESTIMONY  OF  JOHN  LAUTNER— Eesumed 

You  have  been  sworn  on  this  record.  Tell  this  committee  what 
knowledge  or  information  you  have  respecting  the  man  who  is  occn- 
pying  the  witness  chair. 

Mr.  Lautner.  In  1941  and  in  1942,  I  attended  meetings  with  Niko- 
lauk,  top-level  party  leaders  meeting  in  the  IWO.  particularly  in 
1942  when  I  w.is  also  national  secretary  of  the  Hungarian  section 
of  the  IWO.  Nikohiuk  was  the  secretary  of  the  Russian  section  of 
the  IWO. 

Mr.  Arens.  Those  top  level  meetings  you  are  describing  were  meet- 
ings to  which  only  membei's  of  tlie  Connmmist  Party  were  admissible? 

Mr.  Lautner.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  here  and  now  identify  the  man  seated  in  the 
witness  chair  as  a  person  known  by  you  to  a  certainty  to  have  been  a 
member  of  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Lautner.  That  is  correct. 

TESTIMONY  OF  SAMUEL  J.  NIKOLAUK— Resumed 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Nikolauk,  you  have  just  heard  the  testimony  of 
Mr.  Lautner. 

Mr.  NiKOLAUK.  I  invoke  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  heard  the  testimony? 

Mr.  NiKOLAUK.  I  invoke  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Was  Mr.  Lautner  lying  or  telling  the  truth,  under 
oath  ?  Was  he  lying  or  telling  the  truth  when  he  identified  you  as  a 
member  of  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  NiKOLAUK.  Fifth  amendment  to  that. 


COMMUNIST    PROPAG.\XDA    IX    THE    UNITED    STATES  455 

Mr.  Abexs.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  would  con- 
clude the  staff  interrogation  of  this  witness. 

Mr.  Moulder.  All  the  documents  referred  to  by  counsel  and  sub- 
mitted to  the  witness  for  identification  will  be  admitted  in  evidence 
as  a  part  of  the  record  by  reference. 

Do  you  have  anj^  questions,  Mr.  Scherer  ? 

Mr.  Scherer.  No. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  committee  will  stand  in  recess  until  1  p.  m. 

(Thereupon,  at  12  noon,  the  committee  recessed,  to  reconvene  at 
1  p.  m.,  the  same  day.) 

AFTERNOON  SESSION— FRIDAY,  MARCH  15,  1957 

(Connnittee  members  present:  Representatives  Moulder  and 
Scherer. ) 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  committee  will  be  in  order. 

Call  your  first  witness,  ]\Ir.  Arens. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Paul  Novick,  kindly  come  forward. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  you  are 
about  to  give  will  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and  nothing  but  the 
truth,  so  help  you  God  ? 

Mr.  NoviCK.  I  do. 

TESTIMONY  OF  PAUL  NOVICK,  ACCOMPANIED  BY  COUNSEL, 
HAERY  SACHER 

Mr.  Arexs.  Kindly  identify  yourself  by  name,  residence  and  occu- 
pation. 

Mr.  NoviCK.  Paul  Novick,  1639  Monroe  Avenue,  the  Bronx,  news- 
paperman. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  appearing  today  in  response  to  a  subpena  which 
was  served  upon  you  by  the  House  Committee  on  Un-American 
Activities  ? 

Mr.  NoviCK.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  represented  by  counsel  ? 

Mr.  NoviCK.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Sacher.  Harry  Sacher,  3-12  Madison  Avenue,  New  York  17. 

Mr.  Novice.  Mr.  Chairman,  may  I  be  permitted  to  read  a  statement 
before  questioning  starts  ? 

Mr.  Moulder.  How  long  is  the  statement? 

Mr.  Novick.  It  is  one  and  a  half  pages,  double-spaced. 

Mr.  M0UI.DER.  You  can  offer  your  statement  and  file  it  with  the 
proceedings.  However,  the  rules  of  the  connnittee  prohibit  the  read- 
ing or  the  making  of  a  statement  by  a  witness. 

Mr.  Novick.  Will  you  permit  me,  Mr.  Chairman 

Mr.  Moulder.  You  may  file  the  statement  with  the  committee. 

Mr.  Novick.  Thank  you.  I  appreciate  that.  I  think  if  I  read  the 
statement 

Mr.  Moulder.  You  can  give  copies  of  it  to  the  press. 

(Statement  filed  with  the  records  of  the  committee.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Please  tell  us  where  and  when  you  were  born. 

Mr.  Novick.  I  was  born  in  Poland. 

Mr.  AiiENS.  When? 


456  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

Mr.  NoviCK.  September  7,  1891. 

Mr.  Arens.  When  did  you  come  to  the  United  States  ? 

Mr.  NoviCK.  1920. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  a  naturalized  citizen  ? 

Mr.  No^T[CK.  That's  correct. 

Mr.  Arens.  When  and  where  were  you  naturalized? 

J^Ir.  NovrrcK.  January  26,  1927,  Bronx. 

Mr.  Arens.  "\^niere  are  you  employed  ? 

Mr.  NovicK.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  would  like  to  state  my  reasons  why  I 
am  going  to  claim  the  amendments  in  order  not  to  answer  these  ques- 
tions. 

Mr.  Moulder.  You  are  going  to  decline  to  answer  questions  and 
state  your  reasons  for  declining  ? 

Mr.  NovicK.  If  you  will  permit  me,  I  will  state  my  reasons. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Do  you  decline? 

Mr.  NoviCK.  Yes,  I  do  decline  and  I  give  my  reasons :  I  decline  first 
on  the  basis  of  the  first  amendment.  I  think  these  hearings  are  a  vio- 
lation of  the  freedom  of  the  press.  I  was  brought  here  because  I  am 
a  newsman  and  for  no  other  reason. 

Mr.  Scherer.  No,  not  because  you  are  a  newspaperman,  but  because 
you  are  a  Conununist. 

Mr.  Saciier.  May  the  witness  be  permitted  to  state  his  grounds 
without  interruption  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Sacher,  you  know  the  rules  of  the  committee  ? 

Mr.  Sacher.  I  do.     I  think  the  Congressman  should  remember. 

Mr.  Scherer.  I  will  talk  any  time  I  wish. 

]\Ir.  Arens.  You  know  the  rules  of  this  conunittee.  You  are  in 
violation  of  the  rules  of  this  committee. 

Mr.  Sacher.  I  am  not. 

Mr.  NovicK.  Mr.  Sacher  is  here  to  protect  me  from  Mr.  Scherer  or 
anybody  else. 

Mr.  Scherer.  You  do  not  need  any  protection  from  me. 

Mr.  NoviCK.  It  seems  I  do.  I  was  called  here  to  these  hearings 
because  I  am  a  newspaperman  and  no  other  reason.  That  is  why  I 
consider  these  hearings,  and  this  calling  me  here,  is  a  violation  of  the 
freedom  of  the  press,  a  violation  of  the  first  amendment.  I  wish  to 
state  that  the  freedom  of  the  press  is  just  as  sacred  as  the  freedom  of 
Mr.  Scherer  or  any  Congressman.  For  this  reason  I  claim  the  first 
amendment  and  will  not  answer  questions.  I  will  not  identify  any 
documents. 

I  am  also  claiming  the  fifth  amendment  for  the  following  reason : 

it:  *****  * 

The  line  of  questioning  is  to  legalistically  trap  witnesses  with  the  assist- 
ance of  stool  pigeons.  For  this  reason  I  am  claiming  the  fifth  amend- 
ment. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Where  did  you  say  you  were  born  ? 

Mr.  NovicK.  Poland. 

Mr.  Scherer.  When  were  you  naturalized  ? 

Mr.  NoviCK.  1927. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Were  you  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  at  the 
time  you  were  naturalized  ? 

Mr.  NoviCK.  I  decline  on  the  first  and  fifth  amendments. 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  457 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Are  yon  a  member  of  the  Commmiist  Party  today  ? 

Mr.  NovacK.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  first  and  fifth  amendments. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  That  is  the  reason  you  were  brought  here,  because  of 
your  Communist  Party  activities  and  no  other  reason. 

Mr.  NoviCK.  I  gave  my  answer. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Do  you  know  a  man  by  the  name  of  John  Lautner  ? 

Mr,  No^^:cK.  I  decline  to  answer  under  the  protection  of  the  first  and 
fifth  amendments. 

Mr.  Arens.  a  couple  of  days  ago,  Mr.  Lautner  took  an  oath  before 
this  committee  and  swore  that  he  knew  you  as  a  member  of  the  Com- 
munist Party.     Was  he  lying  or  was  he  telling  the  truth  ^ 

Mr.  No\t:ck.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  basis  of  the  two  amend- 
ments. 

Mr.  Arens.  We  are  going  to  display  to  you  a  copy  of  the  statement 
required  by  the  postal  laws  to  be  filed,  a  statement  which  was  filed  by 
the  Morning  Freiheit,  listing  you  as  the  editor  of  the  Morning  Freiheit. 

Kindly  look  at  that  exhibit  and  tell  this  committee,  while  you  are 
under  oath,  whether  or  not  you  are  accurately  described  as  the  editor 
of  the  Morning  Freiheit. 

Mr.  NovicK.  Mr.  Chairman,  as  I  stated  before,  I  will  not  identify 
any  of  these  documents  because  they  pertain  to  the  activities  of  the 
press.     This  is  a  violation  of  the  freedom  of  the  press. 

Mr.  ]\IouLDER.  You  are  claiming  the  privilege  mider  the  fifth  amend- 
ment  

Mr.  NovicK.  The  first  and  fifth. 

Mr.  Moulder  (contmuing) .  In  declining  to  answer  that  question  ? 

Mr.  No\t:ck.  That's  right. 

(Document  marked  "Novick  Exhibit  No.  1,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arexs.  Have  you  ever  been  identified  in  any  capacity  with  the 
International  Workers  Order? 

Mr.  Novick.  I  decline  to  answer  for  the  same  reason. 

Mr.  Arexs.  You  were  one  of  the  original  incorporators  of  it,  were 
you  not  ? 

Mr.  Novick.  I  decline  for  the  same  reason. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Please  look  at  this  petition  in  which  you  are  listed  as 
one  of  the  incorporators  of  that  organization. 

Mr.  No^^CK.  I  decline  to  identify  and  to  answer  for  the  same  rea- 
son. 

(Document  marked  "Novick  Exhibit  No.  2,"  and  retained  in  commit- 
tee files.) 

Mr.  Arexs.  Now,  I  would  like  to  ask  you,  first  of  all,  do  vou  read 
Yiddish? 

Mr.  Novick.  I  certainly  do. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Kindly  follow  me.  Here  is  a  copy  of  your  paper,  the 
Morning  Freiheit,  of  August  28, 1952. 

Mr,  Novick.  Mr.  Chairman. 

Mr.  Arexs.  This  editorial  is  entitled,  "Why  Do  They  Shoot  at  War 
Prisoners  in  Korea?" 

Would  you  kindly  folloAv  me  while  I  read  the  editorial  and  tell  me 
whether  or  not  it  is  a  true  and  correct  copy? 

]\Ir.  Novick.  I  deny  the  right  of  a  counsel  and  of  the  committee  to 
delve  into  the  contents  of  editorials  or  articles  in  the  press.  This  is 
a  violation  of  the  freedom  of  the  press.    I  will  not  follow. 


458  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

Mr.  Moulder.  He  lias  not  asked  you  a  question.  He  has  handed  you 
a  document  to  examine. 

Mr.  NovicK.  Yes,  I  have  examined  it.    As  I  stated  before 

Mr.  Moulder.  In  what  language  is  it  written  ? 

Mr.  NovicK.  In  Yiddish.  For  this  reason  I  will  not  follow,  and  I 
will  not  identify  it. 

Mr.  Moulder.  To  make  the  record  clear,  he  is  not  asking  you  a  ques- 
tion. 

Mr.  Arens.  Editorial,  "Wliy  Do  They  Shoot  at  War  Prisoners  in 
Korea?'' 

i\Ir.  NoviCK.    Pardon,  me,  Mr.  Chairman 

Mr.  Moulder.  Wait  until  he  completes  a  question. 

Mr.  NoviCK.  I  cannot  follow  because  I  would  have  to  sit  down  and 
compare  minutely  every  word  whether  it  is  translated  right  or  wrong 
and  I  can't  do  it  offhand.  That  is  why,  if  Mr.  Arens  wants  to  make 
his  speeches,  he  can  do  so. 

(Document  marked  "Novick  Exhibit  No.  3,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  request  that  in  the  pres- 
ence of  this  witness,  Mr.  Bonora  be  sworn  to  identify  these  documents, 
and  read  them  into  the  record.     Then  we  will  interrogate  the  witness. 

TESTIMONY  OF  FRANK  BONORA 

Mr.  Moulder.  Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  you  are 
about  to  give  will  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and  nothing  but  the 
truth,  so  help  you  God  ? 

Mr.  Bonora.  I  do. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  Frank  Bonora,  an  investigator  for  the  Commit- 
tee on  Un-American  Activities  ? 

Mr.  Bonora.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  you,  at  my  request,  caused  to  be  translated  by  the 
expert  tarnslators  of  the  Library  of  Congress,  several  articles  and 
editorials  appearing  in  the  Morning  Freiheit;  is  that  correct? 

Mr.  BoNORA.  Yes,  sir.     It  was  an  official  request. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  we  have  here  today  the  official  translations  of  each 
of  those  several  articles? 

Mr.  Bonora.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  Would  you  ])lease,  Mr.  Bonora,  read  the  editorial  m  the 
Morning  Freiheit,  August  28,  1952,  the  original  of  which  I  have  laid 
before  Mr.  Novick. 

Mr.  Bonora.  The  editorial  is  from  the  August  28,  1952,  edition  of 
the  Morning  Freiheit,  page  4 : 

Why  Do  They  Shoot  at  War  Prisoners  in  Korea? 

At  Koje  Island  in  South  Korea,  where  North  Korean  and  Chinese  war  prisoners 
are  interned  under  American  guards,  there  is  continuous  shooting.  The  latest 
official  reports  tell  of  52  newly  wounded  prisoners  of  war  and  1  killed,  whom 
military  guards  attacked  with  tear  bombs  and  later  shot  at  because  their  singing 
had  gotten  on  the  nerves  of  their  guards. 

We  must  admit  that,  try  hard  as  we  may,  it  would  be  difficult  to  comprehend 
the  actual  crime  committed  by  the  prisoners  of  war  through  their  singing  in 
their  prison  camps.  According  to  what  law  should  the  death  penalty  be  applied 
for  singing?  It  is  especially  incomprehensible  when  one  remembers  that  the  war 
in  Korea  is  endlessly  dragging  on  and  is  being  brutally  prosecuted  ( or  strength- 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  459 

ened)  in  the  name  of  so-called  American  humanitailanism,  regarding  the  prisun- 
eis  of  war  who  may  perhaps  never  be  released  or  returned  to  their  homes.  In 
order  to  safeguard  the  rights  of  such  anti-Communist  prisoners  of  war  to  remain 
in  the  prison  camps,  for  nobody  wants  them  and  nobody  needs  them,  bloody 
fighting  is  carried  on  daily  and  terrible  air  attacks  against  the  North  Korean 
civilian  population.  But  this  same  humanitarianism  is  not  opposed  to  firing  at, 
wounding,  and  murdering  locked-up  prisoners  of  war  who  dare  to  sing  in  their 
camps. 

This  is  a  translation  from  the  Library  of  Congress. 

TESTIMONY  OF  PAUL  NOVICK— Eesumed 

Mr.  Arexs.  Did  you  publish  that  editorial  which  Mr.  Bonora  just 
read  from  that  edition  of  the  Morning  Freiheit  ? 

Mr.  No\iCK.  I  was  going  to  ask  for  the  name  of  the  translator. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  It  wouldn't  make  any  difference.  If  you  had  the 
name  you  would  still  take  the  fifth  amendment.  You  refused  to  read 
it. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Do  you  refuse  to  answer  the  question  ? 

Mr.  NovicK.  I  do;  on  the  basis  of  the  first  and  fifth  amendments, 
I  would  like  to  know  by  what  right  this  committee  is  delvmg  into 
editorials  of  the  press. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Now  would  you  please 

Mr.  Saciier.  May  the  record  show  that  there  is  complete  silence 
in  response  to  the  witness'  request. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  I  will  answer.  Because  the  Congress  is  investigating 
un-American  propaganda  activities. 

Mr.  No%r[CK.  Together  with  many  Americans  I  question  the  right 
of  this  committee  to  delve  into  the  freedom  of  the  press. 

Mr.  SciiERER.  I  answered  your  question. 

Mr.  Moulder.  You  heard  the  statement  read  by  Mr.  Bonora? 

Mr.  NovicK.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Without  askmg  you  a  question  as  to  whether  or  not 
you  wrote  it  or  where  it  was  published  or  anything  else,  do  you  con- 
sider what  he  read  to  be  un-American  ? 

Mr.  NovicK.  Mr.  Chairman,  you  understand  I  would  like  to  get  into 
a  discussion  and  have  the  same  rights  as  the  counsel  has  before  a 
thousand  or  a  number  of  people. 

Mr.  jNIoulder.  It  is  a  very  simple 

Mr.  Sacher.  Why  don't  you  let  the  man  talk  ?  He  has  been  asked 
a  question  by  the  chairman. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  in  violation  of  the  rules  of  this  committee. 

Mr.  Sacher.  You  don't  let  a  witness  answer  a  question  when  you 
put  it  to  him. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Brother  Sacher 

Mr.  Sacher.  You  and  I  are  not  brothers.    Let  us  not  get  into  that. 

Mr.  Scherer.  I  am  happy  we  are  not. 

Mr.  Sacher.  Believe  me,  it  is  just  as  pleasant  for  me. 

Mr.  Scherer.  I  don't  see  how  they  continue  to  allow  you  to  prac- 
tice. 

Mr.  Sacher.  You  are  ready  to  condemn  anybody.  I  don't  see  how 
you  are  in  Congress. 

Mr.  NovicK.  I  need  protection  from  Mr.  Scherer.  I  don't  think  he 
knows  how  to  behave  in  a  subcommittee  hearing. 

90121— 57— pt.  6 7 


460  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

Mr.  Moulder.  I  just  asked  you  if  you  believe  that  the  freedom  of 
the  press  should  extend  to  the  point  where  subversive  and  un-Ameri- 
can activities  would  be  permitted  to  be  published. 

Mr.  NoviCK.  Mr.  Chairman,  it  is  a  pertinent  question.  I  say  there 
are  laws  of  the  country,  and  we  can  say  anything  or  write  anything 
against  the  laws  of  the  country  and  we  can  be  prosecuted  for  that. 
But  a  committee  of  Congress  has  no  right  to  call  an  editor  of  any 
newspaper  and  hold  him  to  account  for  the  editorials  and  articles  of 
that  paper.    This  is  the  freedom  of  the  press. 

Mr.  Moulder.  It  is  your  position  that  if  they  have  violated  a  crimi- 
nal law,  they  should  be  criminally  prosecuted  ? 

Mr.  NovicK.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Proceed. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  exer  registered  under  the  Foreign  Agents 
Registration  Act  ? 

Mr.  No\t:ck.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  Arexs.  I  suggest  he  be  ordered  and  directed  to  answer  that 
question,  Mr.  Chairman. 

Mr.  No\t:gk.  May  I  hear  the  question  again  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  registered  under  the  Foreign  Agents 
Registration  Act  ? 

Mr.  NovicK.  I  decline  on  the  same  grounds  most  vehemently. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  respectfully  suggest  that  the  witness  be  ordered  and 
directed  to  answer  that  question,  Mr.  Chairman. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  committee  refuses  to  accept  your  response  to  the 
question,  and  you  are  ordered  and  directed  to  answer  the  question. 

Mr.  NovicK.  I  respectfully  decline. 

Mr.  Sacher.  On  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  NoviCK.  On  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  would  like  to  invite  your  attention  to  another  edi- 
torial of  your  paper.  INIr.  Bonora  will  read  it.  It  is  from  the  August 
7,  1952,  edition  of  the  Morning  Freiheit,  page  4.  Kindly  read  that, 
would  you  please,  Mr.  Bonora? 

Mr.  BoNORA.  August  7,  1952,  page  4.    There  is  no  title. 

A  shuclfler  nmst  seize  everyone  who  heard  the  announcement  recently  made 
in  the  name  of  the  U.  N. 

Mr.  Sacher.  Did  jou  say  there  is  a  title  or  not  ? 
Mr.  BoNORA.  There  is  no  title.    It  is  on  page  4.    It  starts  out  "A 
shudder  must  seize." 

A  shudder  must  seize  everyone  who  heard  the  announcement  recently  made  in 
the  name  of  the  U.  N.  by  the  American  General  Glenn  Barnes,  commander  of 
the  8th  Air  Squadron. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  3'ou  read  Yiddish? 

Mr.  Sacher.  Yes ;  I  do.    You  bet  I  do.    I  am  reading. 

Mr.  Scherer.  You  are  not  the  witness. 

Mr.  Sacher.  That  is  all  right.    I  am  reading  it. 

Mr.  Scherer.  I  don't  think  we  have  to  accommodate  counsel. 

Mr.  Sacher.  You  mean  you  are  incapable  of  elemental  courtesy, 
Congressman  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  I  respectfully  suggest  that  the  counsel  be  admonished 
to  restrain  himself  or  be  removed.  He  has  attacked  a  member  of  this 
committee  unjustly,  vehemently,  and  is  in  violation  of  the  rules  of  this 
committee,  repeatedly. 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  461 

Mr.  Moulder.  Any  additional  statements  by  counsel  which  would  be 
vexatious  or  insulting  or  personal  attacks  will  not  be  tolerated. 

Wliat  I  am  coming  to,  though,  is  this :  You  handed  a  document  to 
the  witness.  I  understand  that  you  have  refused  to  examine  the 
docmnent. 

Mr.  NoviCK.  To  identify  it. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Wliile  Mr.  Bonora  reads  the  translation  from  the 
document ;  is  that  correct  ? 

Mr.  NoviCK.  That  is  right.  I  refuse  to  identify  these  documents  on 
the  same  basis. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  point  I  am  making  is  this :  You  refuse  to  take 
the  document  and  examine  it  so  you  might  be  qualified  to  answer  the 
questions  which  might  be  asked  you  about  it.  You  are  directed  and 
requested  by  the  committee  to  hold  the  document  in  your  hand  and 
examine  it  and  look  at  it. 

Mr.  NoviCK.  Mr.  Chairman,  this  is  a  fair  request,  of  course. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Otherwise  you  could  not  even  consider  the  questions 
which  might  be  propounded  to  you. 

Mr.  No\t:ck.  Being  that  I  am  questioning  the  rights  of  the  com- 
mittee to  delve  into  the  editorials  of  any  newspaper  and  of  this  news- 
paper  • 

Mr.  Moulder,  You  base  3^our  refusal  on  the  same  grounds,  the  first 
amendment  ? 

Mr.  NoviCK.  Exactly.  For  this  reason  I  am  not  identifying  these 
documents. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Proceed. 

Mr.  Bonora  (reading)  : 

The  announcement  says,  in  essence,  that  78  cities  in  North  Korea  will  be  de- 
stroyed through  air  attacks.  This  is  a  repetition  of  the  blitz  in  which  Hitler's 
Luftwaffe  specialized  during  the  Second  World  War,  and  which  was  so  sharply 
condemned  everywhere  in  the  civilized  world. 

The  translation  is  from  the  same  section  of  the  Library  of  Congress. 

Mr.  No\t:ck.  May  I  ask  a  question  here  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  write  that  editorial  just  read  to  you  by  Mr. 
Bonora  ? 

Mr.  NoviCK.  May  I  say  a  few  words  ? 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  question  is  pending. 

Mr.  No\^CK.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  same  gToimds.  I  would  like 
to  ask,  Mr.  Chairman,  most  Americans  fought  for  peace  in  Korea. 
Our  President  went  to  Korea  for  peace. 

(Document  marked  "Novick  Exhibit  No.  J:,''  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  ScHERER.  I  object  to  any  speeches  on  the  part  of  the  witness. 
He  refuses  to  answer  any  question.  Why  should  he  have  the  right 
to  ask  us  questions  or  make  a  speech  ? 

Mr.  No\^CK.  I  heard  Mr.  Arens  malce  quite  a  few  speeches 
yesterday. 

Mr.  SciiERER.  We  will  let  you  make  a  speech  if  you  will  answer 
one  of  the  questions. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  editorial  or  the  writing  speaks  for  itself.  Let 
us  proceed. 

Mr.  Arens.  Would  you  kindly  tell  us  what  does  Morning  Freiheit 
mean  ? 


462  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

Mr.  NoviCK.  Morning  Freedom. 

Mr.  Abens.  We  want  to  display  to  you  the  reproduction  of  several 
articles  in  your  paper — Mr,  Bonora  will  just  allude  to  them — an- 
nouncing meetings  of  the  Communist  Party  to  be  held  in  1952  at 
various  places  over  the  community. 

Mr.  BoNORA.  September  1, 1952,  page  2,  Morning  Freiheit. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  suggest  you  not  take  the  time  to  read  the  entire  article, 
but  allude  to  it.    If  he  wants  to  follow  the  translation  he  can  do  so. 

Mr.  BoNORA  (reading)  :  Elections  Meeting  of  Communist  Party, 
September  5, 1952. 

Election  Meeting  of  the  Communist  Party  in  New  York 

The  national  office  of  the  Communist  Party  announced  yesterday  that  the 
Communist  Party  will  officially  open  its  1952  election  campaign  at  a  mass  meet- 
ing in  Rockland  Palace  ballroom  *  *  * 

and  announces  a  conference  of  delegates. 
September  4, 1952,  page  4 : 

Tomorrow,  Friday,  September  5,  a  large  election  meeting  arranged  by  the 
Communist  Party  will  be  held  in  Kockland  Palace,  155th  Street  and  8th  Avenue. 
At  this  meeting  the  issues  in  the  current  election  campaign  will  be  discussed*  *  * 
The  speakers  will  include  Elizabeth  Gurley  Flynn,  Pettis  Perry,  and  Simon 
Gerson  *  ♦  * 

Mr.  Arens.  Now,  Mr.  Novick,  are  those  articles  alluded  to  by  Mr. 
Bonora  in  these  translations  true  and  correct  ? 

Mr.  NovicK.  I  decline  to  identify  and  answer  on  the  same  grounds, 
the  first  and  fifth  amendments. 

(Documents  marked  "Novick  Exhibit  No.  5,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  I  want  to  display  to  you  the  document  which  is  the 
nominating  petition  of  the  Communist  Party  of  November  1940  in 
which  you  are  listed  as  one  of  the  electors  for  the  Communist  Party, 
at  large  in  New  York  City.  Please  look  at  that  document  and  tell 
us  whether  or  not  you  are  accurately  described. 

(Witness  examined  document.) 

Mr.  NovrcK.  I  decline  to  identify  and  to  answer  the  question  on  the 
same  grounds. 

(Document  marked  "Novick  Exhibit  No.  6,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Now,  I  want  to  display  to  you  a  document,  a  Communist 
magazine  entitled  "The  Communist,"  in  which  you  have  an  article 
entitled  "A  Solution  for  Palestine,"  by  Paul  Novick.  Please  look  at 
that  document  and  tell  us  whether  or  not  you  are  the  author  of  that 
article. 

Mr.  Novick.  I  decline  to  identify  and  to  answer  on  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  witness  is  directed  and  ordered  to  at  least  cooper- 
ate to  the  extent  of  looking  at  and  examining  the  document  that  is 
handed  to  the  witness  by  counsel. 

Mr.  Sacher.  Let  the  record  show  that  he  did  look  at  it. 

Mr.  Novick.  Yes ;  I  did  look  at  it.    But  I  refuse  to  identify  it, 

(Document  marked  "Novick  Exhibit  No.  7,"  and  retained  in 
committee  files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Now  we  have  two  other  articles  in  The  Communist 
written  by  Paul  Novick.     The  first  is  Palestine — Land  of  Anti-Impe- 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  463 

rialist  Struggle.  The  other  is  Zionism  and  Imperialist  War,  by  Paul 
Novick.  Please  look  at  those  articles  and  tell  us  whether  or  not  you 
would  be  good  enough  to  identify  them. 

(Witness  examined  documents.) 

Mr.  NoviCK.  I  respectfully  decline  to  identify  and  to  answer  on  the 
same  grounds,  both  amendments,  first  and  fifth. 

(Documents  marked  "Novick  Exhibit  No.  8,"  and  retained  in 
committee  files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  In  1944  you  were  one  of  the  national  committee  members 
of  the  Communist  Political  Association,  were  you  not  ? 

Mr.  NovicK.  I  respectfully  decline  to  answer  on  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  lay  before  you  a  photostatic  copy  of  the  Daily  Worker, 
May  23, 1944,  page  2,  in  which  you  are  so  identified. 

Mr.  No^^:cK.  Same  answer,  Mr.  Chairman. 

(Document  marked  "Novick  Exhibit  No.  9,"  and  retained  in 
committee  files.) 

Mr.  Arexs.  You  have  also  been  on  the  editorial  board  of  another 
publication,  Jewish  Life,  have  you  not  ? 

Mr.  No^T[CK.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  same  grounds,  Mr.  Chairman. 

Mr.  Arens.  We  lay  before  you,  if  you  please,  a  thermofax  repro- 
duction of  two  issues  of  the  publication,  Jewish  Life,  November  1948, 
and  April  1950,  on  which  j^our  name  appears  as  a  member  of  the  edi- 
torial board.  Please  look  at  those  and  tell  us  whether  or  not  you  are 
accurately  described. 

Mr.  NovicK.  Some  more  delving  into  the  press,  and  I  decline  to 
answer  on  the  grounds  of  the  first  and  fifth  amendments. 

(Documents  marked  "Novick  Exhibit  No.  10,"  and  retained  in 
committee  files. ) 

Mr.  Arens.  In  1936  you  wrote  an  article  which  we  have,  in  the 
Communist  Daily  Worker,  November  7,  page  2,  entitled  "All  IMoscow 
Festive  on  Eve  of  19th  Soviet  Anniversary,"  in  which  you  hail  the 
Soviet  system  and  in  which  you  tell  all  about  how  wonderful  it  is  in 
Moscow.  You  are  writing  from  Moscow.  Please  look  at  this  article 
and  tell  us  if  you  are  accurately  described  therein. 

Mr.  No^^[CK.  There  are  quite  a  fevr  correspondents  writing  in 
Moscow.  You  see  every  day  cables  from  IMoscow  in  the  New  York 
Times  and  other  newspapers.  This  is  delving  into  the  press.  I  decline 
on  the  same  grounds,  both  amendments. 

(Document  marked  "Novick  Exhibit  No.  11,"  and  retained  in 
committee  files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  in  Moscow  in  1936  ? 

Mr.  Novick.  I  respectfully  decline. 

Mr.  Arens.  'Wliat  did  you  do  in  Moscow  in  1936,  completely  di- 
vorced from  any  activities  from  the  press  ? 

Mr.  NoAacK.  I  respectfully  decline  on  the  same  grounds,  both 
amendments. 

Mr.  Arens.  How  many  times  have  you  been  in  IMoscow  since  you 
came  to  the  United  States  and  obtained  American  citizenship? 

Mr.  NovTCK.  I  respectfully  decline,  Mr.  Chairman,  on  the  same 
grounds. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  have  also  in  addition  to  your  journalistic  career 
been  active  as  a  professor,  have  you  not  ? 

(No  response.) 


464  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  been  active  also  as  an  instructor  or  professor  I 

Mr.  NowcK.  You  said  professor.  This  is  news  to  me.  I  am  not  a 
professor. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  been  an  instructor  or  lecturer  ? 

Mr.  NoviCK.  I  respectfully  decline  to  answer. 

Mr.  Arens.  Why  i 

Mr,  NovicK.  On  both  grounds,  the  first  and  fifth. 

Mr.  Arens.  We  would  like  to  display  to  you  a  bulletin  of  the  Work- 
ers School  in  which  Mr.  Earl  Browder  was  celebrated  and  in  which 
your  name- 


Mr,  Sacher.  Celebrated  as  what  ? 

Mr.  Arens  (continuing).  And  in  which  your  name  is  listed  as  one 
of  the  instructors  and  lecturers  at  the  Workers  School  in  New  York, 
along  with  a  number  of  other  leading  Communist  conspirators. 

Please  look  at  that  document  and  tell  us,  if  you  would  be  good 
enough,  whether  or  not  you  are  accurately  identified. 

Mr.  NovicK.  I  decline  to  identify  and  answer  on  the  same  grounds, 
Mr.  Chairman. 

(Document  marked  "Novick  Exhibit  No.  12,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  We  are  going  to  lay  before  you  several  documents  in 
which  you  are  identified  by  the  Communist  Daily  Worker  and  by 
various  bulletins  issued  by  certain  organizations  in  your  capacity  as 
editor  of  the  Morning  Freiheit,  as  instructor  in  the  School  of  Jewish 
Studies,  in  various  public  activities. 

Please  look  at  those  documents  and  be  good  enough  to  tell  us  if  they 
truly  and  accurately  reflect  the  facts. 

Mr.  No\^CK.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  decline  to  identify  and 
answer  on  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  Moulder.  As  to  each  and  every  one  of  the  documents  submitted 
to  you,  is  that  right  ? 

Mr.  Novick.  That  is  right ;  yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  The  fact  is  that  the  INIorning  Freiheit  is  only  one  more 
tentacle  of  the  international  Communist  propaganda  apparatus  in 
the  United  States,  isn't  that  true  ? 

Mr.  Novick.  Mr.  Chairman,  this  is  McCarthy  talk. 

Mr.  Arens.  Deny  it  while  you  are  under  oath. 

Mr.  Novick.  I  decline  on  the  same  grounds.  This  is  not  parliamen- 
tary language.    This  is  inciting  language ;  McCarthy  talk. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  would  con- 
clude the  staff  interrogation  of  this  witness. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  I  have  no  questions. 

Mr.  Moulder.  May  I  make  our  position  clear?  In  the  beginning  of 
these  hearings  we  made  it  clear  and  emphasized  that  it  certainly  is 
not  the  intention  on  the  part  of  this  committee  or  members  of  the 
staff  to  interfere  in  any  manner  whatsoever  with  freedom  of  the  press. 
We  respect  it,  we  have  the  highest  regard  for  it,  and  we  think  it  is 
one  of  the  fundamental  liberties  which  w^e  enjoy  in  this  country. 

However,  we  do  feel  it  to  be  our  duty  to  expose  publications  of  a 
seditious  nature  or  which  carry,  with  them  the  spirit  of  sedition  or 
treasonable  writings  which  are  un-American  and  probably  subversive. 
And  to  expose  it  so  that  the  people  might  know  the  origin  from 
whence  come  such  publications. 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  465 

If  such  publications  are  Coiiiniuiiist  controlled  and  the  officers  and 
editors  are  controlled  by  the  Conmuinist  conspiracy,  then  that  fact 
should  be  revealed  and  the  public  should  be  advised  and  informed 
of  it. 

The  witness  is  excused. 

Call  your  next  witness. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Irving  Freed,  please  come  forward.  Kindly  re- 
main standing  while  the  chairman  administers  an  oath  to  you. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  you  are 
about  to  give  shall  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and  nothing  but  the 
tnith,  so  help  you  God  ? 

Mr.  Freed.  I  do. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  In  view  of  what  has  been  said,  I  think  I  should  read 
into  the  record  the  powers  and  duties  of  the  connnittee  as  fixed  by  law. 

The  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities,  as  a  whole  or  by  subcommittee,  i3 
authorized  to  make  from  time  to  time  investigations  of  the  extent,  character,  and 
objects  of  un-American  propaganda  activities  in  the  United  States ;  the  diffusion 
within  the  United  States  of  subversive  and  un-American  propaganda  that  is  insti- 
gated from  foreign  countries  or  of  a  domestic  origin  and  attacks  the  principle 
of  the  form  of  government  as  guaranteed  by  our  Constitution ;  and  all  other 
questions  in  relation  thereto  that  would  aid  Congress  in  any  necessary  remedial 
legislation. 

Mr.  Moulder.  That  is  Public  Law  601. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Yes. 

Mr.  Moulder.  And  M^e  are  dutybound  and  directed  by  the  Con- 
gress of  the  United  States  to  go  into  this  subject  and  this  investiga- 
tion. 

TESTIMONY  OF  IRVING  FREED,  ACCOMPANIED  BY  COUNSEL, 

HARRY  SACHER 

Mr.  Arens.  Kindly  identify  yourself  by  name,  residence,  and  oc- 
cupation. 

Mr.  Freed.  Irving  Freed,  2725  Barker  Avenue,  Bronx,  N.  Y. ; 
writer. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  appearing  today  in  response  to  a  subpena 
which  was  served  upon  you  by  the  House  Un-American  Activities 
Committee  ? 

Mr.  Freed.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  represented  by  counsel  ? 

Mr.  Freed.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Sacher.  Harry  Sacher,  still  at  342  Madison  Avenue,  New 
York,  N.  Y. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  is  the  name  of  tlie  man  who  preceded  you  to  the 
witness  stand  ? 

Mr.  Freed.  I  respectfully  decline  on  the  basis  of  first  and  fifth 
amendments. 

Mr.  Arens.  He  is  editor  of  the  Morning  Freiheit,  is  he  not? 

Mr.  Freed.  I  decline  on  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  Arens.  Wliere  and  when  were  you  born  ? 

Mr.  Freed.  October  24,  1908,  in  the  town  called  Bershad,  in  Eus- 
sian  Ukraine. 

Mr.  Arens.  'Wlien  did  you  come  to  the  United  States  ? 

Mr.  Freed.  November  1921. 


466  COlMlMTJiVIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  a  citizen? 

Mr.  Freed.  I  am,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  By  naturalization? 

Mr.  Freed.  Derivative  citizenship. 

Mr.  Arens.  Wliere  are  you  employed? 

Mr.  Freed.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  same  grounds. 

]Mr.  Arens.  You  are  the  managing  editor  of  the  Morning  Freiheit, 
are  you  not? 

Mr.  Freed.  I  respectfully  decline  on  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  Arens.  We  would  like  to  display  to  you  two  documents  at 
this  time. 

The  first  is  a  statement  filed  with  the  postal  authorities  by  the 
Morning  Freiheit  in  which  you  are  identified  as  the  managing  editor 
of  the  Morning  Freiheit. 

(Document  previously  identified  as  "Novick  Exhibit  No.  1,"  and 
retained  in  committee  files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  The  second  is  a  certificate  filed  by  the  Morning  Freiheit 
Association,  Inc.,  pursuant  to  the  membership  corporation  law  with 
the  State  of  New  York  in  which  you  are  likewise  so  identified  and  on 
which  you  signed  your  name  as  one  of  the  directors  of  that  corpora- 
tion. 

(Document  marked  "Freed  Exhibit  No.  1,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

]\Ir.  Arens.  Please  look  at  those  two  documents  and  tell  this  com- 
mittee while  you  are  under  oath  whether  or  not  you  are  accurately 
described  therein. 

(Witness  examined  documents  and  conferred  Avith  coiuisel.) 

Mr.  Freed.  I  decline  on  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  a  man  by  the  name  of  John  Lautner  ? 

Mr.  Freed.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  sam.e  grounds. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Lautner  2  or  3  days  ago  took  an  oath  and  identified 
vou  as  a  member  of  the  Communist  Partj^  Was  he  lying  or  telling  the 
truth? 

Mr.  Freed.  I  respectfully  decline  on  the  same  grounds,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  is  Jewish  Life,  do  you  know  ? 

Mr.  Freed.  I  decline  on  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  Arens.  That  is  a  publication  published  by  tlie  Morning  Frei- 
heit Association ;  isn't  that  correct  ? 

Mr.  Freed.  I  decline  on  the  same  grounds,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  would  like  to  display  to  you  now,  if  you  please,  an  ar- 
ticle by  yourself,  a  guest  editorial,  appearing  in  Jewish  Life  (Sep- 
tember 1947),  by  Irving  Freed.  Please  look  at  this  article  in  which 
you  are  identified  as  managing  editor  of  the  Morning  Freiheit,  daily 
Yiddish,  anti-Fascist  news])aper,  and  tell  us  whether  or  not  you  are 
accurately  and  truthfully  identified  there. 

(Witness  examined  document.) 

Mr.  Freed.  I  decline  on  the  same  grounds. 

(Document  marked  "Freed  Exhibit  No.  2,"  and  retained  in  commit- 
tee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  the  man  who  preceded 
3^ou  to  the  witness  stand,  Paul  Novick,  is  a  member  of  the  Communist 
conspiracy  ? 

Mr.  Freed.  I  decline  on  the  same  sronnds. 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    EN    THE    UNITED    STATES  467 

Mr.  Arens.  We  have  2  or  3  exhibits  here  in  which  your  activities  are 
described  in  the  Communist  Daily  Worker.  I  should  like  to  have 
you  examine  them,  if  you  would  please  be  good  enough.  One,  the 
Communist  Daily  Worker  of  November  13,  1950,  identiHes  you  as  one 
of  the  persons  who  sought  to  visit  the  Communist  leader,  Alexander 
Bittelman.  Please  look  at  that  and  tell  us  whether  or  not  you  are 
axjcurately  identified. 

(Witness  examined  document.) 

Mr.  Freed.  I  respectfully  decline  on  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  would  con- 
clude the  staff  interrogation  of  this  witness. 

( Documents  marked  "Freed  Exhibit  No.  3,"  and  retained  in  commit- 
tee files.) 

Mr.  ]\IouLDER.  The  witness  is  excuspd. 

Mr.  Arens.  ISIr.  Gerhard  Hagelberg. 

(No  response.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  we  take 
a.  5-minute  recess.  Mr.  Hagelberg  agreed  to  be  here  at  2  o'clock  and 
it  is  just  a  little  before  2  o'clock. 

JMr.  Moulder.  The  committee  will  stand  in  recess  for  a  few  minutes. 

(Thereupon  a  brief  recess  was  taken.) 

Mr.  Arfxs.  Ml-.  Hagelberg,  do  j^ou  want  to  come  forward,  please? 

Mr.  Moulder.  Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  you  are 
about  to  give  shall  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and  nothing  but 
the  truth,  so  help  you  God  ? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  do. 

TESTIMONY  OF  GERHARD  HAGELBERG  ACCOMPANIED  BY  COUNSEL, 

E.  J.  DONNER 

]SIr.  Arens.  Kindly  identify  yourself  by  name,  residence,  and  occu- 
pation. 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  Gerhard  Hagelberg,  127  West  82d  Street,  New 
York  City  24 ;  researcher. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  appearing  today,  Mr.  Hagelberg,  in  response 
to  a  subpena  which  was  served  upon  you  by  the  House  Committee 
on  Un-American  Activities  ? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  That  is  right ;  by  a  marshal. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  represented  by  counsel? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Arens.  Counsel,  would  you  kindly  identify  yourself? 

Mr.  Donner.  F.  J.  Donner,  342  Madison  Avenue,  New  York  City. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Hagelberg,  have  you  ever  been  known  by  any  name 
other  than  Gerhard  Hagelberg? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  tlio  grounds 
of  the  first  and  fifth  amendments. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  3^ou  honestly  feel  that  if  you  told  this  committee 
truthfully  whether  or  not  you  have  been  known  by  any  name  other 
than  the  name,  Gerhard  Hagelberg,  you  would  be  supplying  informa- 
tion which  might  be  used  against  you  in  a  criminal  proceeding? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  Mr.  Arens,  I  cited  the  first  and  fifth  amendments 
to  the  previous  question. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  respectfully  suggest  that  tlie  witness  be  ordered  and 
directed  to  answer  that  last  question. 


468  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  witness  is  ordered  and  directed  to  answer  the 
question.  I  want  to  advise  and  inform  you  that  the  committee  does 
not  accept  your  response  to  the  question  as  being  a  legitimate  cause  for 
refusing  to  answer.  I  further  advise  you  of  the  possible  dangers  of 
being  guilty  of  contempt  of  Congress  for  your  refusal  to  answer. 

(Witness  consulted  with  counsel.) 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  decline  on  the  grounds 
of  the  first  and  fifth  amendments. 

Mr.  Arens.  "V^riiere  are  you  employed  ? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  Mr.  Arens,  I  think  the  question  upon  which  you 
are  entering  now,  due  to  the  nature  of  my  work,  opens  up  an  area 
which  I  must  respectfully  decline  to  answer  for  this  reason :  I  am  a 
legal  researcher  and  I  think  questions  of  the  precise  natuT'e  of  my  em- 
ployment would  violate  confidential  relationships.  For  that  reason. 
Mr.  Arens,  I  respectfully  decline  to  answer. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  are  you  employed  ? 

Mr.  Moulder,  fliist  a  moment,  please.  Again  the  committee  refuses 
to  accept  your  reasons  for  refusal  to  answer  and  you  are  ordered  and 
directed  to  answer  the  question. 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  In  light  of  the  fact  that  my  previous  objection  has 
not  been  upheld  by  you,  1  must  take  the  provisions  of  the  first  and  fifth 
amendments. 

I\ir.  Akexs.  \^'liere  are  you  employed  ? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  The  same  two  answei-s  that  I  just  gave.  That  is  the 
same  question. 

Mr.  Arens.  In  what  city  iire  you  emj)loyed? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  In  New  Y(»rk  (^ity. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  is  the  physical  location  of  the  place  where  you 
are  employed? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  To  that  question  I  must  give  the  same  two  answers 
that  I  just  gave  to  your  immediate  preceding  question. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Do  I  understand  you  decline  to  answer  for  the  same 
reasons  previously  given  ? 

!Mr.  Hagelberg.  Botli  on  the  grounds  of  violation  of  confidential 
relationships  and  on  the  first  and  fifth  amendments,  Mr.  Chairman. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  presently  managing  editor  of  The  German- 
American,  published  by  The  German-American,  Inc.  ? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  That  question  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  grounds 
of  the  first  and  fifth  amendments,  violation  of  the  freedom  of  the  press. 
I  think  it  goes  beyond  the  scope  of  this  committee.  I  think  it  is  a 
violation  of  due  process.  It  would  tend  to  enter  into  an  area  in  which 
self-incrimination  lies. 

Mr.  Arens.  We  should  like  to  hn-  before  you  now  a  thermof ax  re- 
production of  the  statement  filed  pursuant  to  the  postal  laws  by  The 
German-American,  Xew  York,  X.  Y.,  on  which  you  are  designated  or 
indicated  as  the  managing  editor  of  The  German- American. 

Please  look  at  that  docmnent  and  tell  this  committee  whether  or  not 
you  are  accurately  described. 

(Witness  examined  document.) 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  the  grounds  of 
the  first  and  fifth  amendments,  ]Mr.  Arens. 

(Document  marked  "Hagelberg  Exhibit  No.  1,''  and  retained  in 
connnittee  files.) 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IX    THE    UNITED    STATES  469 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  were  3011  bom,  jukI  when  ? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  atus  boni  in  Berlin,  (rerniany,  on  September  7, 
1925. 

Mr.  Arexs.  AVhen  did  you  come  to  tlic  rnilt'd  States  for  peraianent 
residence  ? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  came  to  the  United  States  in  1943. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  ccnne  under  the  quotas? 

Mr.  HAGELBER(i.  I  should  think  so;  yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  a  citizen  of  the  United  States? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  Let  me  finish  my  answer,  Mr.  Arens. 

I  have  no  precise  recollection,  but  I  know  it  was  a  regular  entry  and 
that  sort  of  thing. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  a  citizen  of  the  United  States? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  By  naturalization? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  By  naturalization. 

Mr.  Arens.  When  and  where  were  you  naturalized? 

Mr.  Hageli5erg.  I  was  naturalized  in  the  United  States  Army,  in 
Camp  Lee,  Va.,  in  1941. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  3'ou  a  member  of  the  Connnunist  Party  at  the 
time  you  were  naturalized? 

Mr".  Hagelberg.  Mr.  Arens.  that  is  a  little  silly  question.  I  was  18 
years  old  at  the  time  I  was  in  the  Army.  I  had  been  in  this  country 
less  than  a  year.     So  it  is  a  frivolous  question. 

Mr.  Arens.  Deny  it  if  it  is  not  true. 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  Excuse  me,  Mr.  Arens,  I  am  speaking.  You  asked 
me  a  question.  In  view  of  the  area  upon  which  you  have  entered  I 
will  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  the  grounds  of  the  first  and 
fifth  amendments. 

Mr.  Arens.  Kow  give  us  a  brief  resume  of  your  employment  after 
you  arrived  in  the  United  States.     I  believe  you  said  in  1925. 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  was  born  in  1925. 

Mr.  Arens.  1943.     I  beg  your  pardon.     1943  until  the  present. 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  Shortly  after  coming  here  I  began  to  w^ork  on  a 
spinach  farm.  Then  I  went  into  the  Army.  With  minor  small  in- 
terruptions after  coming  out  of  the  Army,  I  clerked  for  awhile.  I 
was  unemployed  for  awhile.  I  clerked  some  more  and  I  finally  be- 
came a  researcher. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  or  ha\e  you  loiown  a  person  by  the  name 
of  Enuga  S.  Reedy  employed  by  United  Nations  ( 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  the  grounds  of 
the  first  and  fifth  amendments. 

Mr.  Arens-  Have  you  engaged  in  espionage  ? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  No,  Mr.  Arens,  I  have  not. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  knowledge  of  espionage? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  have  not  finished.  I  have  never  engaged  in  es- 
pionage, Mr.  Arens,  and  I  doubt  whether  the  FBI  Avould  need  your 
help  to  either  find  out  about  any  espionage  or  lead  to  my  conviction  if 
I  had  done  any  espionage. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  any  knowledge  of  any  espionage  against  this 
Government  ? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  If  I  had  knowledge  about  any  espionage  against 
this  Government,  I  would  certainly  bring  it  to  the  attention  of  the 
proper  authorities,  Mr.  Arens,  without  your  encouragement. 


470  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  j-ou  honestly  feel  if  you  told  this  committee  truth- 
fully whether  or  not  you  know  Enuga  S.  Reedy,  you  would  be  supply- 
ing information  which  could  be  used  against  you  in  a  criminal  pro- 
ceeding ? 

Mr.  IIagelbekg.  I  stand  by  my  previous  answer. 

Mr,  Aeens.  I  respectfully  suggest,  Mr.  Chairman,  that  the  witness 
be  ordered  and  directed  to  answer  that  question. 

]\Ir.  Moulder.  The  witness  is  ordered  and  directed  to  answer  the 
question. 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  the  grounds  of 
the  first  and  fifth  amendments. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  a  person  by  the  name  of  Harold  Leven- 
thal  ? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  the  grounds 
of  the  first  and  fifth  amendments. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  a  person  by  the  name  of  Isadore  Needle- 
man? 

Mr.  Hagleberg.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  the  grounds  of 
the  first  and  fifth  amendments. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  a  person  by  the  name  of  Kumar  Goshal  ? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  the  grounds  of 
the  first  and  fifth  amendments. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  a  person  by  the  name  of  Prasauta,  first 
name,  and  last  name,  Mahalanohis? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  How  do  you  pronounce  that? 

Mr.  Arens.  I  don't  know.  M-a-h-a-1-a-n-o-h-i-s.  Do  you  know  such 
a  person  ? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  the  grounds  of 
the  first  and  fifth  amendments. 

Mr.  Arens.  Wliat  contact  have  you  had  in  the  course  of  the  last 
year  with  persons  who  are  representatives  in  the  United  States  of  for- 
eign governments  ? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  the  grounds  of 
the  first  and  fifth  amendments  and  I  think  it  is  completely  beyond  the 
scope  of  this  committee  and  this  particular  inquiry. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  on  April  25,  1956,  attend  a  meeting  in  New 
York  City  in  the  apartment  of  Harold  Iveventhal? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  the  grounds  of 
the  first  and  fifth  amendments. 

Mr.  Arens.  "Wlio  is  Milton  Friedman? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  don't  understand  that  question. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  a  person  by  the  name  of  Milton  Friedman  ? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  Could  you  identify  the  Milton  Friedman  to  whom 
you  refer  a  little  more  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  a  person  by  the  name  of  Milton  Friedman  ? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  think,  Mr.  Arens,  we  are  again  treading  on  the 
area  of  confidential  relationships  to  my  work  as  a  legal  researcher  to 
which  I  must  respectfully  decline  to  answer. 

Mr.  Arens.  Does  this  legal  research  keep  you  in  touch  with  the 
Committee  for  a  Democratic  Far  Eastern  Policy  ? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  staff  consultant  for  the  Committee  for  a  Demo- 
cratic Far  Eastern  Policy ;  are  you  not  ? 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    EST    THE    UNITED    STATES  471 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  the  grounds 
previously  stated,  the  first  and  fifth. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  used  the  name  Charles  Wisley  ? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  the  grounds 
of  the  first  and  fifth  amendments. 

Mr.  Arens.  The  fact  is  that  you  have  used  the  name  Charles  Wisley 
in  some  of  your  writings;  have  you  not? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  the  grounds 
of  the  first  and  fifth  amendments. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  want  to  lay  before  you  the  Communist  publication,. 
Masses  and  Mainstream,  bearing  an  article  by  Charles  Wisley,  attack- 
ing United  States  imperialism,  and  ask  you  if  it  is  not  a  fact  that 
you  are  the  Charles  Wisley  who  wrote  the  article  in  Masses  and 
Mainstream. 

(Witness  examined  document  and  consulted  with  counsel.) 

Mr.  Ha^gelberg.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  the  grounds 
of  the  first  and  fifth  amendments. 

(Document  marked  "Hagelberg  Exhibit  Xo.  2,"  and  retained  in 
committee  files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  We  have  two  other  articles  under  which  the  name  of 
Charles  Wisley  appears,  August  12,  1947,  and  July  1,  1947,  in  New 
Masses.  Look  at  those  two  articles  and  tell  this  committee  if  it  is  true 
that  you  wrote  those  articles  under  the  name  Charles  Wisley. 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  the  grounds 
of  the  first  and  fifth  amendments  and  I  think  it  is  completely  beyond 
the  scope  of  this  committee. 

(Documents  marked  "Hagelberg  Exliibit  No.  3"  and  retained  in 
the  committee  files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  used  the  name  Jerry  Kramer? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  first  and  fifth 
amendments. 

Mr.  Arens.  Wliat  was  the  name  under  which  you  enlisted  in  the 
United  States  Army  ? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  didn't  enlist. 

Mr.  Arens.  Under  which  you  served  in  the  United  States  Armyj 
I  beg  your  pardon. 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  My  name,  Gerhard  Hagelberg.  I  have  two  middle 
initials. 

Mr.  Arens.  When  did  you  use  the  name  Jeriy  Kramer? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  You  as  a  lawyer  know  you  can't  ask  a  question  like 
that.     You  are  making  an  assumption ;  aren't  you  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  I  put  it  to  you  as  a  fact  and  ask  you  to  affirm  or  deny 
the  fact  that  you  have  used  the  name  of  Jerry  Kramer.  Deny  it  while 
you  are  under  oath  if  you  please,  sir. 

Mr.  HL^gelberg.  I  take  the  privileges  accorded  to  me  and  any  other 
Ajnerican  citizen  under  tlie  first  and  fifth  amendments  to  that  question 
in  whatever  form  you  put  that. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  yon  honestly  apprehend  that  if  you  told  this  com- 
mittee truthfully  whether  or  not  you  have  ever  used  the  name  Jerry 
Kramer,  you  would  be  supplying  information  which  could  be  used 
against  you  in  a  criminal  proceeding  ? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  the  grounds 
of  the  first  and  fifth  amendments. 


472  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  the  witness 
be  ordered  and  directed  to  answer  that  question. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  witness  is  so  ordered  to  answer  the  question. 

(Witness  consulted  with  counsel.) 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  must  respectfully  give  the  same 
answer,  the  privileges  of  the  first  and  fifth  amendments. 

Mr.  Arens.  Wliat  is  your  present  home  address  ? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  am  in  the  telephone  book,  Mr.  Arens.  My  home 
address  is  127  West  82d  Street. 

Mr.  Arens.  How  long  have  you  lived  there  ? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  am  trying  to  think. 

Mr.  Arens.  Approximately. 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  For  about  2  to  2^/^  years. 

Mr.  Arens.  AVliere  did  you  live  immediately  prior  to  the  time  you 
moved  to  your  present  address  ? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  Prior  to  that  time  I  lived  on  73d  Street, 

Mr.  Arens.  How  long  did  you  live  there  ? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  Probably  about  2  years.  Don't  hold  me  to  that 
exactly. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  did  you  live  immediately  prior  to  the  time  that 
you  lived  on  73d  Street  ? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  On  East  12th  Street. 

Mr.  Ari<:ns.  What  is  the  address  on  East  12th  Street  ? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  think  520.    It  is  all  the  way  over  anyway. 

Mr.  Arens.  How  long  did  you  live  there  ? 

]\Ir.  Hagelberg.  A  couple  of  years,  approximately. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  where  did  you  live  prior  to  that  time? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  In  Brooklyn  Heights,  I  think,  Mr.  Arens. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  what  was  the  address  there  ? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  That  was  on  Hicks  Street. 

Mr.  Arens.  Was  that  151:  Hicks  Street? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  am  not  quite  sure. 

Mr.  Arens.  Or  was  it  156  Hicks  Street? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  am  afraid  I  could  not  say  that  definitely  one 
way  or  another. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Was  it  on  that  street? 

Mr.  HxVGELBERG.  It  was  Hicks  Street;  yes,  Mr.  Chairman. 

Mr.  Arens.  AVliat  group  did  you  belong  to  when  you  lived  on  Hicks 
Street  in  Brooklyn  ? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  think  that  question  is  so  vague,  Mr.  Arens  that 
you  cannot  expect  me  to  answer  it. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  one  of  the  ringleaders  of  the  Boro  Hall 
Section  of  the  Communist  Party  on  Hicks  Street  in  Brooklyn  in  1948  ? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  Apart  from  the  vagueness  of  the  tenn  "ringleader" 
in  view  of  the  area  of  the  question  I  decline  to  answer  it  on  the  gromids 
of  the  first  and  fifth  amendments. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  has  been  your  connection  with  the  Committee 
for  a  Democratic  Far  Eastern  Policy  ? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  the  grounds 
of  the  firet  and  fifth  amendments. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  lay  before  you  a  thermofax  reproduction  of  the 
letterhead  of  the  Committee  for  a  Democratic  Far  Eastern  Policy  on 
which  you  are  listed  as  one  of  the  consultants  to  that  organization. 


COIMIMUNIST    PROPAGAXDA    IN    THE    UTSHTED    STATES  473 

Please  look  at  that  letterhead  and  tell  us  while  you  are  under  oath 
whether  or  not  you  are  accurately  described. 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  the  grounds 
of  the  first  and  fifth  amendments. 

(Document  marked  "Hagelberg  Exhibit  No.  4."  and  retained  in 
committee  files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  "iVliat  has  been  vour  connection  with  the  Far  East 
Spotlight? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  the  same 
grounds. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  would  like  to  display  to  you  now  a  bulletin  of  the 
Far  East  Spotlight  (June  1949)  in  which  your  name  appears  as  one 
of  the  consultan1:s  to  that  publication.  Please  look  at  this  bulletin 
and  tell  this  committee  while  you  are  under  oath  wliether  or  not  you 
are  accurately  described. 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  the  grounds 
of  the  first  and  fifth  amendments. 

(Document  marked  "Hagelberg  Exhibit  Xo.  ,5"  and  retained  in 
committee  files.) 

iSIr.  Arens.  You  have  authored  articles  for  the  Spotlight  on  the 
Far  East  published  by  the  Committee  for  a  Democratic  Far  Eastern 
Policy  ? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  Are  you  testifying,  Mr.  Arens  ? 

Mr.  Arexs.  I  respectfully  suggest  that  the  witness  be  ordered  and 
directed  to  answer  that  question. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  witness  is  so  ordered. 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  decline  on  the  grounds  of  tlie  first  and  fifth 
amendments. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  lay  before  you  a  thermofax  reproduction  of  an  article 
in  Spotlight  of  August-September  1947,  under  autliorship  by  yom' 
real  name,  Gerhard  Hagelberg,  entitled,  "Indonesia  at  the  U.  N." 
Please  look  at  that  document  and  tell  us  whether  or  not  you  are  accu- 
rately described. 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  the  grounds  of 
the  first  and  fifth  amendments. 

(Document  marked  "Hagelberg  Exhibit  No.  6,"'  and  retained  in 
connnittee  files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  I  lay  before  you  two  other  articles  which  you  have 
nurhored  r.nder  the  name  of  Gerhard  Hagelberg  in  the  Far  East  Spot- 
light (September  1948  and  March  1949) .  Please  look  at  those  and  see 
if  you  would  be  good  enough  to  help  the  Committee  on  Un-American 
Activities  by  identifying  those  articles. 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  decline  to  answer  the  question  concerning  these 
Iwo  purported  documents  on  the  grounds  of  the  first  and  fifth  amend- 
ments. 

(Documents  marked  "Hagelberg  Exhibit  No  7,"'  and  retained  in 
committee  files.) 

Mr.  Arexs.  Wliat  have  you  done  toward  revealing  to  the  world  the 
so-called  spy  operations,  intelligence  operations  of  the  United  States? 
Can  you  help  us  on  that  ?  ^Yhat  have  you  done  to  enlighten  the  world 
on  the  spy  operations  of  the  Government  under  whose  flag  you  have 
protection  ? 

Ivfr.  IlAGri.'BERo.  Would  you  mind  enlightening  me,  Mr.  Arens  ? 


474  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

Mr.  Aeens.  Yes;  I  would  like  to  lay  before  you  right  now  rather 
than  to  quibble,  the  Daily  Worker  of  March  17,  1953,  page  8.  The 
article  states,  "A  detailed  account  of  United  States  intelligence  opera- 
tions in  the  Socialist  countries,  documented  by  copious  citations  wholly 
drawn  from  commercial  press  sources,  is  the  subject  of  an  extended 
article  bj^  Gerhard  Hagelberg  in  the  March  issue  of  the  progressive 
monthly,  Jewish  Life." 

Please  look  at  this  article  in  the  Communist  Daily  Worker  of  March 
1953  and  tell  this  committee  while  you  are  under  oath  whether  or  not 
you  are  accurately  described  as  the  author  of  the  article  detailing  the 
so-called  intelligence  operations  of  the  United  States  Government 
behind  the  Iron  Curtain. 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  Will  you  enlighten  me?  Are  you  conducting  a 
large  inquiry  into  the  American  press? 

Mr.  Arens.  I  respectfully  suggest  that  the  witness  be  ordered  and 
directed  to  answer  the  question. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  witness  is  directed  and  ordered  to  answer  that 
question. 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  Would  you  repeat  the  question?     I  am  sorry. 

Mr.  Arens.  Please  read  the  question  to  him,  Mr.  Reporter. 

(Question  read  by  the  reporter.) 

Mr.  PIagelberg.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  the  grounds 
of  the  first  and  fifth  amendments. 

(Document  marked  "Hagelberg  Exhibit  No.  8,"  and  retained  in 
committee  files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  obtain  any  information  for  that  article  from  a 
restricted  or  confidential  source? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  Since  that  question  assumes  a  fact  not  in  evidence, 
I  cannot  answer  it.  As  far  as — apart  from  the  particular  area,  my 
obtaining  any  material  from  confidential  or  restricted  sources — I  as- 
sume you  mean  by  the  United  States  Government,  the  answer  to 
that 

Mr,  ScHERER.  Or  from  any  Russian  agent. 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  Mr.  Scherer,  one  question  at  a  time,  please. 

Mr.  Scherer.  I  just  wanted  to  help  you  out. 

Mr.  ELagelberg.  No  ;  thank  you,  sir. 

To  the  extent  that  that  aspect  of  the  United  States  is  covered,  is 
covered  by  my  previous  answer  to  your  previous  question. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Let  us  quit  the  doubletalk. 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  beg  your  pardon. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Let  us  quit  this  doubletalk.  Did  you  get  any  of  this 
information  that  you  published  in  this  article  from  confidential 
sources  ? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  Of  what  nature,  Mr.  Scherer? 

Mr.  Scherer.  As  I  asked,  from  a  Russian  agent  or  material  that  is 
classified. 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  Since  you  assume,  Mr.  Scherer,  that  I  published 
the  article 

Mr.  Scherer.  Is  there  any  question  about  it  ? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  don't  think  there  is — ; — 

Mr.  Scherer.  Let  me  ask  you  this  question. 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  Mr.  Scherer,  have  you  ever  heard  of  the  case  of 
Burdick  v.  United  States  (236  U.  S.  79)  ? 


COMMUlSriST    PROPAGANDA    EST    THE    UNITED    STATES  475 

Mr.  ScHERER.  You  answer  this  question.  Is  my  assumption  that 
you  published  that  article  incorrect?  I  \Yant  you  to  tell  these  people 
whether  I  have  assumed  incorrectly. 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  am  ti-ying  to  tell  you,  Mr.  Scherer,  that  no  as- 
sumption can  be  dra\vn  from  my  taking  the  first  and  fifth  amend- 
ments with  regard  to  the  previous  question  as  to  this  purported 
document. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Let  us  forget  the  previous  question.  Is  my  assump- 
tion that  you  published  this  article  incorrect? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  The  answer  to  that  is  again  the  first  and  fifth 
amendments. 

Mr.  Scherer.  I  thought  so. 

Mr.  Arens.  We  would  like  to  invite  to  your  attention  an  article  en- 
titled, "The  Conspiracy  Against  Southeast  Asia,"  by  Gerhard  Hagel- 
berg, appearing  in  theFar  East  Spotlight  (November  1948).  Please 
be  good  enough  to  tell  this  committee  while  you  are  under  oath  if  you 
are  the  author  of  that  article. 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  decline  to  answer  this  question  on  the  grounds 
that  it  is  an  invasion  of  the  freedom  of  the  press  as  guaranteed  by  the 
first  amendment  or  the  privileges  accruing  to  me  under  the  fifth 
amendment. 

(Document  marked  "Hagelberg  Exhibit  No.  9"  are  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  I  would  like  to  read  you  excerpts  from  this  next  article 
by  yourself,  Gerhard  Hagelberg,  appearing  in  April  17,  1949,  issue 
of  the  Communist  Daily  Worker.     I  will  read  only  excerpts : 

The  Chinese  people's  victory  is  the  most  significant  event  since  the  October 
revolution  because,  like  the  founding  of  the  Soviet  Union,  the  emergence  of 
China's  new  democracy  will  influence  every  move  in  both  the  reactionary  and 
democratic  camps  in  the  world.  The  passing  of  China  into  the  democratic  camp 
means  the  addition  of  vast  forces  and  vital  lessons  to  the  arsenal  of  the  side 
fighting  imperialism.  From  a  base  for  an  imperialistic  war,  China  has  been 
turned  into  stronghold  of  peace.  China's  lesson  of  the  necessity  of  unity  of  all 
anti-imperialists,  as  well  as  the  unity  of  the  people  with  its  army  and  the  unity 
of  the  people  with  its  Communist  Party,  has  already  been  applied  with  success 
in  Greece  and  Vietnam,  and  it  is  equally  valid  for  Israel  or  Mexico. 

The  Chinese  people  have  proved  that  even  American  imperialism,  which  is 
today  the  leader  of  the  world  imperialist  camp  and  the  main  prop  of  the  colonial 
system,  is  in  reality  only  a  "paper  tiger,  terrible  to  look  at,  but  melting  when  the 
rains  come."  They  have  done  so  by  defeating  American  imperialism  on  a  battle- 
ground of  its  own  choice,  for  nowhere  in  the  world  have  the  American  imperialists 
expended  so  much  money  and  material  in  so  many  different  ways  as  in  China. 

With  the  victory  in  China,  two  paths  have  been  opened  to  the  people  still  suf- 
fering from  imperialism.  One  is  the  path  followed  by  the  leaders  of  India  and 
the  Philippines,  by  Pandit  Nehru  and  General  Romulo — the  jackals  of  Anglo- 
American  imperialism.  This  is  the  path  of  compromise  with  imperialism,  hidden 
by  anti-imperialistic  verbiage.  It  is  followed  by  those  who  do  not  trust  the  i>eo- 
ple  and  who  do  not  recognize  the  leadership  of  the  Soviet  Union. 

The  other  )>ath  is  the  path  of  Mao  Tse-tung.  This  is  the  path  of  Marx,  Engels, 
Lenin,  and  Stalin  applied  to  the  concrete  situation  and  needs  of  a  country 
dominated  by  imperialism. 

It  is  the  path  of  resolute  opposition  to  reaction,  and  it  entails  the  leadership 
of  the  Communist  Party,  the  alliance  of  workers  and  peasants,  as  well  as  the 
organization  of  the  entire  people  in  the  conscious  cooperation  with  all  the  pro- 
gressive forces  in  the  world  in  the  establishment  of  a  people's  democratic  dicta- 
torship.    This  is  the  path  of  success. 

Look  at  that  masterpiece  of  Communist  propaganda  and  tell  this 
committee  whether  or  not  you  are  the  author  of  it. 

90121— 57— pt.  6 8 


476  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

Mr.  HiVGELBERG.  Is  this  inquiry  within  the  scope  of  the  committee  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  the  witness 
be  ordered  and  directed  to  answer  that  question  at  his  peril. 

Mr.  Scherer.  If  it  isn't,  then  nothing  is. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  witness  is  directed  to  answer  the  question, 

Mr.  Scherer.  This  is  a  glaring  example  of  subversive  activities. 
Where  would  you  have  a  more  glaring  example  ? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  decline  to  answer  this  question  on  the  grounds  of 
the  first  and  fifth  amendments. 

(Document  marked  "Hagelberg  Exhibit  No.  10,"  and  retained  in 
committee  files.) 

Mr.  MouT.DER.  May  I  interrogate  the  witness  in  this  respect  ?  Could 
you  explain  to  us  how  and  why  your  denial  or  admission  of  being 
the  author  of  this  article  interferes  with  the  freedom  of  the  press'? 

Mr,  Hagelberg.  Mr.  Moulder,  it  seems  to  me  that  the  inquiry  is  an 
attempt  to  stifle  the  freedom  of  the  press. 

Mr.  Moulder.  No  interference  has  apparently  ])revented  the  pub- 
lication of  that  article  nor  the  author,  whoever  wrote  it,  from  ])ublish- 
ing  it.  I  can't  understand  your  reasoning  that  there  would  be  any 
interference  with  the  freedom  of  the  press  by  your  admission  or  your 
denial  of  being  the  author  of  it. 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  Mr.  Moulder,  aren't  you  trying  to  intimidate  pre- 
cisely by  this  sort  of  inquiry  the  future  freedom  of  the  press  as  well 
as  past  and  future? 

Mr.  Scherer.  You  will  go  out  and  write  something  real  bad  about 
this  committee. 

Mr.  PIagelberg.  "We  are  discussing  this  now,  I  presume. 

Mr.  Scherer.  I  want  to  show  you  that  you  are  not  intimidated. 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  Quite  in  the  abstract. 

Mr.  Scherer.  We  want  to  show  the  people,  the  type  of  people  who 
write  this  tiling,  that  they  are  Communist  agents.     That  is  all. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Proceed  with  the  questioning. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  now,  this  instant,  a  member  of  the  Communist 
conspiracy  ? 

Mr.  Hagelbercj.  I  don't  know  what  that  question  means. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  the  witness 
be  ordered  and  directed  to  answer  that  question. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  witness  is  directed  to  answer  the  question. 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  How  can  I  answer  a  question  that  I  don't  know 
the  meaning  of? 

Mr.  Moulder.  You  mean  you  deny  having  any  Iviiowledge  or  in- 
formation, or  of  knowing  Avhat  the  Communist  conspiracy  is? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  merely  said  I  don't  understand  the*  meaning  of 
the  question. 

Mr.  Arens.  Let  us  change  tlie  question  and  be  facetious.  Are  you 
a  patriotic  ('ommunist? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  don't  know  the  meaning  of  that  question  either. 

Mr,  Arens,  Or  are  you  just  a  plain  Communist? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  will  decline  to  answer  the  question  on  the  grounds 
of  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  respectfully  suggest  that  tliis  concludes  the  staff 
interrogation  of  this  witness. 

Mr.  Scherer.  He  has  the  right  to  write  those  articles  and  tomorrow 
write  another  one  perhaps  more  violent  and  false  than  that  one. 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  477 

Nothing  interferes  with  his  writing.  You  can  go  ahead  and  do  it.  But 
nothing  interferes  with  this  Congress'  right  to  point  out  to  the  Ameri- 
can people  just  who  writes  that  kind  of  propaganda.  They  should 
have  the  advantage  when  they  read  that  kind  of  stuff  of  knowing  who 
the  author  is,  knowing  that  he  is  a  representative  of  the  Communist 
conspiracy. 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  You  seem  to  be  under  the  misapprehension  that 
there  has  been  any  admission  here  of  anything  whatsoever.  There 
has  not  been. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Do  you  deny  that  you  are  a  member  of  the  Com- 
mimist  Party? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  I  claim  the  protection  of  the  United  States  Consti- 
tution, Mr.  Scherer.    From  that  there  is  no  assumption,  no  inference. 

Mr.  Scherer.  I  am  inferring  it. 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  That  is  your  privilege. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Is  my  assumption  incorrect? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  It  is  your  privilege  to  make  any  assumptions. 

Mr.  Scherer.  I  am  assuming  that  you  are  a  dedicated  Communist, 
one  of  the  most  dangerous  people  in  the  United  States  to  this  Gov- 
ernment.   Is  that  assumption  incorrect  ? 

Mr.  Hagelberg.  Mr.  Scherer,  to  the  question  of  what  your  assump- 
tions are,  I  must  also  respectfully  decline  to  answer  and  I  cannot 
possibly  enter  into  the  workings  of  your  mind,  Mr.  Scherer. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Are  there  any  other  questions  ? 

The  witness  is  excused. 

Do  you  have  any  statement  to  make,  Mr.  Scherer? 

Mr.  Scherer.  Yes.  I  have  been  asked,  and  properly  so,  by  a  rep- 
resentative of  the  press  to  point  out  that  Jewish  Life,  published  at  22 
East  17th  Street,  is  not  to  be  confused  with  the  Orthodox  Jewish  Life 
published  at  305  Broadway.  The  committee  is  happy  to  comply  with 
tliat  request. 

Mr.  Chairman,  I  have  just  a  few  comments  in  relation  to  the  hear- 
ings that  have  taken  place  here  in  New  York. 

During  the  hearings  this  week  there  have  ajjpeared  before  the 
Committee  on  Un-American  Activities  numerous  owners,  editors,  and 
managers  of  various  foreign-language  newspapers  published  in  the 
United  States.  The  great  majority  of  those  who  appeared  are  foreign 
born,  who  have  been  given  citizenship  in  the  United  States.  Now  let 
us  see  how  they  used  that  citizenship. 

Most  of  these  publications  carry  vigorous,  false,  pro-Russian,  com- 
munistic propaganda.  Some  even  bitterly  attacked  the  United  States 
during  the  Korean  war  with  charges  that  have  given  aid  and  comfort 
to  the  enemy.  This  constitutes  treason  under  the  laws  and  the  Con- 
stitution of  the  LTnited  States.  All  who  were  called  are,  or  have  been, 
dedicated  Communists.  These  newspapers  are  read  by  thousands  of 
people  in  the  United  States,  many  of  whom  cannot  read  English ;  and 
they  must,  therefore,  rely  on  these  newspapers  for  their  political  in- 
formation. These  are  publications  carrying  the  Communist  line  and 
cleverly  and  subtly  working  toward  the  ultimate  objective  of  the 
Communist  conspiracy;  namely,  the  internal  subversion  and  destruc- 
tion of  the  Government  of  the  United  States,  as  indicated  by  the 
testimony  involving  the  last  witness. 


478  COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES 

They  are  the  fifth  column,  more  dangerous  to  our  safety  and  secu- 
rity than  10,000  enemy  troops  poised  on  the  other  side  of  the  Iron 
Curtain.  They  are  doing  the  work  of  the  Kremlin  here  in  this  coun- 
try. They  have  violated  in  every  way  the  citizenship  which  has  been 
given  to  them.    In  fact,  they  are  hiding  behind  their  citizenship. 

The  law  provides  for  the  denaturalization  of  active  Communists, 
people  like  these.  In  view  of  the  overwhelming  evidence  adduced  at 
these  hearings  here  in  New  York,  it  is  the  duty  of  this  subcommittee 
to  recommend  that  the  House  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities 
urge  the  Bureau  of  Immigration  and  Naturalization  and  the  Depart- 
ment of  Justice  to  take  such  steps  in  accordance  with  law  to  bring 
about  the  denaturalization  and  eventual  deportation  of  these  people. 

Nothing  I  have  said  should  be  construed  as  indicating  that  all  for- 
eign-language newspapers  are  Communist  dominated  and  Communist 
controlled,  because  this  is  simply  not  true.  As  has  been  demonstrated, 
however,  this  week,  and  we  have  only  scratched  the  surface,  there  are 
enough  of  these  foreign-language  newspapers  so  controlled  as  to 
warrant  continued  hearings. 

Furthermore,  nothing  which  I  have  said  should  be  construed,  as 
the  Daily  Worker  is  planning  to  do,  as  an  attack  upon  foreign-born 
citizens  of  this  country.  The  vast  majority,  by  far,  of  these  people 
are  fine,  loyal,  law-abiding  citizens.  They  are  being  exploited  and 
misinformed  by  these  Communists  who  are  using  the  very  freedom 
of  the  press  in  this  country  to  promote  the  aims  of  the  Russian  con- 
spiracy in  this  cold  war. 

That  is  all  I  have  to  say. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Thank  you,  Mr.  Scherer. 

First  I  want  to  i-eemphasize  the  statement  we  made  in  the  begin- 
ning of  the  hearings.  It  is  not  the  purpose  nor  intention  of  this 
committee  to  interfere  with  the  freedom  of  the  press  in  any  manner 
whatsoever,  except  only  as  an  agency  of  the  Congress  under  Public 
Law  601  to  investigate  subversive  and  un-American  propaganda  that 
is  instigated  from  foreign  countries  or  of  a  domestic  nature. 

In  concluding  this  series  of  hearings  in  New  York,  I  should  like 
to  make  a  few  observations  respecting  certain  concrete  accomplish- 
ments which  I  feel  have  resulted  from  the  evidence  Ave  have  adduced. 

In  the  first  place  we  have  heard  testimony  and  seen  numerous 
exhibits  respecting  the  flood  of  Communist  propaganda  which  is 
entering  the  port  of  New  York  from  Communist  countries  and  from 
Communist  sources  in  non-Communist  countries.  This  testimony  and 
these  exhibits  are  important  in  confirming  similar  evidence  which  we 
have  received  at  other  ports  of  entry.  It  helps  complete  the  picture 
of  the  nationwide  problem  which  confronts  us.  We  have  received, 
moreover,  several  concrete  suggestions  for  amendments  to  various 
laws  dealing  with  the  labeling  and  processing  of  this  foreign  Com- 
munist propaganda.  These  suggestions  we  will  take  back  to  Congress 
in  Washington  and  consider  carefully  in  connection  with  the  legis- 
lative phases  of  our  committee  work. 

I  should  like  to  point  out  here  that  most  of  the  internal  security 
legishition  of  the  Congress  in  the  course  of  the  last  several  years  has 
been  processed  through  the  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities. 
This  legislation  includes  the  Internal  Security  Act,  the  Communist 


COMMUNIST    PROPAGANDA    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES  479 

Control  Act,  the  Imniuiiity  Act,  and  numerous  amendments  to  the 
Criminal  Code. 

These  hearings  here  in  New  York  City  have  also  developed  im- 
portant facts  respecting  the  source  and  nature  of  Connnunist  propa- 
ganda which  is  formulated  here  in  the  United  States. 

One  significant  phase  of  these  hearings  has  been  the  testimony 
respecting  the  attempts  of  the  Comnuinist  conspiracy  to  subvert  and 
control  certain  segments  of  the  foreign-language  press  and  thereby 
influence  nationality  groups  in  this  country  to  the  Communist  cause. 
In  this  period  of  cold  war  in  which  the  Kremlin  and  the  free  world  are 
competing  for  the  minds  of  men,  it  is  vital  for  the  free  world  to  know 
as  much  as  possible  about  tliose  who  serve  the  cause  of  international 
communism  and  tlie  idealogical  propaganda  weapons  which  they  use. 

We  have  also  received  in  this  series  of  hearings  an  indirect  con- 
firmation of  the  fraud  which  the  National  Convention  of  the  Com- 
munist Party  tried  to  perpetrate  by  proclaiming  its  innocence  of 
conspiratorial  connections  with  Moscow.  Time  after  time,  witness 
after  witness  who  had  been  identified  as  a  Communist  leader  refused 
to  reveal  to  us  the  facts  respecting  this  so-called  new  look  of  the  Com- 
munist Party.  In  spite  of  the  searching  questions  which  we  posed  to 
them,  they  evaded  or  i-efused  to  answer  because  they  knew  that  they 
were  under  oath  and  could  be  proceeded  against  for  perjury  if  they 
lied  to  this  committee,  as  they  are  lying  to  the  American  public,  re- 
specting their  true  nature  and  designs.  We,  and  I  am  sure  the  great 
majority  of  the  American  people,  prefer  to  accept  the  statements  of 
J.  Edgar  Hoover,  Director  of  the  FBI,  when  he  recently  warned  that 
the  so-called  new  look  of  the  Communist  Party  is  a  fraud  and  a  ruse. 

Before  closing  the  hearings,  I  should  like  to  express  our  deep  appre- 
ciation to  the  many  who  have  cooperated  with  the  committee,  including 
the  United  States  marslial :  the  representatives  of  the  press,  radio,  and 
television;  and  the  authorities  having  jurisdiction  over  this  liearing 
room. 

The  committee  Avill  be  adjourned. 

(Thereupon,  at  2:45  p.  m.,  Friday,  March  15,  1957,  the  liearing 
was  adjourned  subject  to  the  call  of  the  Chair.) 


INDEX 


Individuals 

Pag* 

Adler,  Margaret 282 

Allen,  James  (born  Sol  Auerbach) 285,343-346  (testimony) 

Astrovsky 265 

Auerbach,  Sol.     {See  Allen,  James.) 

Baron,  Rose 285,329-334  ( testimony ),  335,  339 

Bayer,   Theodore 283,369-^73  ( testimony ),  454 

Bentley,  Elizabeth 426-428 

Bimba,  Anthony 438-441  (testimony) 

Bittelman,   Alexander 467 

Bodonyi,  Anna 390 

Bonora,   Frank 419-422  ( testimony ),  458-459  (testimony) 

Boussinnouse,  Janine 377 

Browder,  Earl 464 

Brown,  Fred 427 

Brown,  Lloyd 364 

Budenz.  Louis 308, 324 

Buteneff.  Serge 272-275  (testimony) 

Cameron,    Angus 320-329  ( testimony ),  332 

Cohen,  Boris 285 

Cowl,  Margaret.     (-S'ee  Krumbein,  Margaret.) 

Dattler.  Louis 281,375.403-406  (testimony),  40S 

Deak,  Zoltan  (born  Morton  Grad)— _  280,364,365,373-387  (testimony), 398, 405 

Deak,  Zoltan    (Dr.) 364,365 

Dennis,    Eugene 294 

Dirba,  Charlie 285 

Donner,  F.  J 467 

Eastland,  James  O 303 

Eisler,   Gerhart 282 

Evatt   (Herbert  V.) 422 

Faulkner,  Stanley 320 

Felshin,  Joseph  (also  known  as  Joseph  Fields) 285,358-361  (testimony) 

Field,  Frederick  Vanderbilt 348 

Fields,  Joseph.     (See  Felshin,  Joseph.) 

Fishman,    Irving 253-271  (testimony),  272,  287 

Flynn,  Elizabeth  Gurley 462 

Fodor,   Erna 393 

Forer,  Joseph 347,  369 

Foster,  William  Z 331,339 

Fraenkel,  Osmond  K 305 

Freed.  Irving 283,465^67  (testimony) 

Freedman,  David  M 329,335,388 

Friedman,    IMilton 470 

Gates,  John 284,291-304  (testimony),  309.  310,  317 

Gellert,  Hugo 376,  406 

Gero  (Erno) 391 

Gerson,  Simon  W 304,  462 

Gollobin,  Ira 412 

Golos    (Jacob) 427,  42S 

Goshal,  Kumar 470 

Grad,  Morton.     (See  Deak,  Zoltan.) 

Gyarmaty,    Catherine 282,373.388-397  (testimony),  411 

Hagelberg,  Gerhard  (also  known  as  Charles  Wisley  and  Jerry  Kramer) 

467-477  (testimony) 
Halpern,  Milton.     {See  Howard,  Milton.) 
Hoover,  J.  Edgar 302-304,315,479 


ii  INDEX 

Page 

Howard,  Milton  (born  Milton  Halpern) 286,361-364  (testimony) 

Ilchuk,  Frank 435-437  (testimony) 

Johnson,  Manning 440 

Kramer,  Jerry.     {See  Hagelberg,  Gerhard.) 

Kress,  Irving 333 

Krinkin,  David  Z 373,448-452  (testimony) 

Krumbein,  ^Margaret  (nee  Cowl) 284,332,335-342  (testimony) 

Laughlin,  Francis  B 253  (testimony),  254,  270,271 

Lautner,   John 275-289  (testimony),  300,  310,  319,  330,  331, 

334,  340,  344.  347,  348,  361,  362,  364-365  (testimony),  371,  374,  388,  395, 
399,  404,  407,  411,  427,  429,  454  (testimony),  457,  466. 

Lee,  James  (Shew  Hong) 373,417-424  (testimony) 

Leventhal,    H|arold 470 

Mahalanohis,   Prasauta 470 

Malkin,    Maurice 428 

Marzani,  Carl 320 

Mate 401,402 

Max,  Alan 299 

Mizara,  Roy 441-447   (testimony) 

Moy,  Eugene 423 

Munsell,  Alex 320 

Nagy,  Arpad  Fodor 281,375,406-409  (testimony) 

Needleman,  Isadore  G 425,  435,  438,  441,  448,  452,  470 

Nemeth 400,401 

Nestus.     {See  Tkach,  Michael.) 

Nikolauk,   Samuel  J 283,  452-454  (testimony) 

Novick,    Paul 284, 373,  455Mt64  ( testimony ),  466 

Orekhov,  Fedor  T 367 

Perry,    Pettis 462 

Philbrick,   Herbert 324 

Rabinowitz.    Victor 366 

Rakosi    ( Matyas ) 391 

Ratiani,   Georgi  Mikhailovich 367 

Reedy,  Enuga  S 469,470 

Reich.    Clara 282,388,393,409-412  (testimony) 

Rosenberg,  Ethel 420,  421 

Rosenberg,    Julius 420, 421 

Rosenbei-g,    Michael 420 

Rosenberg,    Robert 420 

Rosner,  Alex 376,  397-403  (testimony),  405 

Ross,    Paul 417 

Sacher,   Harry 291,  343,  358,  361,  455,  465 

Salerno,  Michele  (Michael) 382,  429 

Saunders,  Dr.    (Richard  P.) 385-387 

Savides,  Michael 412-417   (testimony) 

Shew  Hong.     {See  Lee,  James.) 

Smith,  Jessica  (Abt) 285,  347-358  (testimony) 

Sokolsky,     George 445 

Solon,    Charles 414-415  (testimony) 

Southard,    Ordway 366-368  (testimony) 

Starobin,    Joseph 284,286,305-319  (testimony) 

Thompson,  Bob 282 

Tkach,  Michael  (also  known  as  Nestus)_  282,  283,  373,  425-435  (testimony),  441 

Torok,    Margaret 388,  411 

linger,    Abraham 373,  397,  403,  406,  409 

Villofosse,    Louis 377 

Warner,  James  E 303 

Wisley,  Charles.     {See  Hagelberg,  Gerhard.) 

Organizations 

All-Slav   Congress 283 

American    Jewish    Committee 446 

American  League  for  Peace  and  Democracy 345 

American  Lithuanian  Workers  Literary  Association 438 

American-Russian  Fraternal  Society,  IWO  : 

National  Committee 453 

American  Slav  Congress 454 

American-Ukrainian  Society,  IWO 437 


INDEX  iil 

Page 

Cameron  Associates 320 

Central    Books 366 

China  Peace  Committee 312 

Citizens  Emergency  Defense  Conference 371,  372 

Committee  for  a  Democratic  Far  Eastern  Policy 472,  473 

Communist   Information   Bureau 279 

Communist  Party,  USA 277,  462 

National  structure : 

16th  National  Convention,  February  9-12,  1957,  New  York  City_  303,  304 

Central  Committee 440 

Control  Commission 283,  285 

Hungarian  National  Bureau 275,  276,  280-282,  304,  408 

Literature    Commission 360 

National  Hungarian  Training  School  (Cleveland,  Ohio) 399 

National  Training  School 276 

Nationality  Groups  Commission 276,  277,  279,  283 

Review   Commission 276,    285 

Women's  Commission 341 

Michigan  :  Control  Commission 275 

New   York 276 

Brooklyn.  Boro  Hall  Section 472 

Review  Commission 276 

West   Virginia 276 

Communist  Political  Association 463 

Conference  for  Legislation  in  the  National  Interest 326 

German-American,    Inc 468 

Guozi   Shudian 337 

Hungarian  Brotherhood.  IWO 410 

Hungarian  IWO  Center  (Bronx) 405 

Hungarian  Social  Club 378,  405 

Hungarian  Word,  Inc 375,  410 

Imported  Publications  and  Products 333,  335 

International    Lalior   Defense 331 

International  Publishers 332,  344 

International  W^)rkprs  Order 279,  280,  282,  372,  376,  382,  399,  400,  429.  457 

Hungarian  Section 276,  282 

Russian  Section 283,  454 

Jefferson  School  of  Social  Science 345 

Liberty  Book  Club 320,  321,  324 

Little  Brown  &  Co .328 

^lagyar  Konyvesltolt   (bookshop) 377 

Mainstream  Associates,  Inc .360 

Mezhdunarodnaja  Kniga  (International  Book  Publishing  Association) 366 

National  Committee  to  Secure  .Justice  in  the  Rosenberg  Case 420 

National  Council  of  American-Soviet  Friendship 349,  369.  372 

National  Council  of  Hungarian  Women .389,  .390 

National  Wallace  for  President  Committee .328 

National  Women's  Appeal  for  the  Rights  of  Foreign  Born  Americans 393 

New  Century  Publishers.  Inc 286,  ,332,  .358 

New  York  International  Publishers 3.33 

New  York  Workers  Book  Shop .3.30 

Polonia  Society  for  Liaison  With  Immigration 274 

Prompt  Press 285 

Publishers  New  Press,  Inc 299 

Russky  Golos  Publishing  Corp 283,  284,  370,  448,  453 

Samuel  Adams  School  for  Social  Studies 324 

Save  the  Children  Federation 385,  387 

School  of  Jewish  Studies 464 

Ukrainian-American  Fraternal  Union 429,  436 

United  States  Government : 

.Justice  Department 2.54,  259 

Post  Office  Department 254,  256,  260,  265,  266 

State  Department 2,58,  259 

Treasury    Department 254 

Bureau  of  Customs 253,  2.54 

Women's  International  Democratic  Federation 389 

Workers  Book  Shop 330,  331,  337 

Workers'    Council 401 


iv  INDEX 

Page 

Workers  Library  Publishers 286,  359 

Workers  School  (New  York  City) 340,  362,  464 

World  Youth  Festival : 

First  Youth  Festival,  Prague,  1947 437 

Sixth   Youth   Festival,   Youth   and    Students   Festival   for   Peaceful 
Friendship,  Moscow,  July  and  August  1957 267 

Young  Communist  League  (Youngstown,  Ohio) 284 

Publications 

China  Daily  News 373,  41S-423 

Communist  International 279 

Communist,  The 286,  a59,  462 

Daily  Worker 279,  284,  293,  299,  306,  308,  318,  319,  345,  363 

Ember 412 

Events  in  Himgary,  The 267 

Far  East  Spotlight 473 

For  a  Lasting  Peace,  for  a  People's  Democracy 280 

German-American  (Tribune) 282,  468 

Greek- Am ei-ican  Tribune 413-415 

Home  Front.  The 264 

How  "Steel  Was  Tempered 265 

Hungarian  Daily  Journal 277,  280,  281,  283,  373,  375.  376,  398 

Hungarian  Word 281,  282,  375,  376,  397,  398,  404--408,  410 

Hungarian  Working  People  Will  Uphold  Their  Socialist  Gains,  The 267 

Inprecorr.      (See  International  Press  Correspondence.) 

International  Affairs 288,  333 

International    News 333 

International  Press  Correspondence   (Inprecorr) 279 

Je^\^sh  Life 463,  466,  477 

Kind  of  Freedom  Reaction  Wanted  for  Hungary,  The 267 

Labor   (No.  20) 268 

Labor    Defender 345 

Labor's  Work 264 

Laisve 441,  442,  445,  446 

Literary  Gazette,  The 264 

Magyar    Jovo 406 

Masses  and  Mainstream 362,  364 

Morning  Freiheit 283.  284,  373,  457,  458,  460,  461,  464,  466 

New  Data  for  V.  I.  Lenin's  Imperialism,  the  Highest  Stage  of  Capitalism- _      333 

New   Masses 306 

New  Times 257,  261,  264,  267,  3.33 

New  World  Review 348,  371 

News 261 

Nok  Vilaga  (Women's  World) 282.  373,  388,  393,  410,  411 

Orthodox  Jewish  Life 477 

Our  Homeland 274 

People  Come  Fir.st 352 

People's  Daily,  The  (Peking,  China) 268 

Poland 262 

Political  Affairs 286,  359 

Pravda 367 

Rumania  Today 262 

Russky  Golos 283,  372,  373,  448-450 

Some  Facts  on  Soviet  Assistance  to  Hungary 267 

Soviet   Literature 333 

Soviet  Russia  Today 283,  285,  348,  351.  .371 

Soviet  Union 261,  262,  264,  337 

Soviet  Women ;'>33 

Sviesa 438,  440 

U.  S.  S.  R 262 

Ukrainian  Daily  News 283,  373,  426,  427,  430,  432-436 

What  Has  Hapi>ened  in  Hungary 267 

Women  in  'Soviet  Russia 3."2 

Women's  World.     {See  Nok  Vilaga.) 

Worker,  The 286,  345 

o 


BOSTON  PUBLIC  LIBRARY 


3  9999  05706  3164 


^   ■ 


^i*- 

O^^ 

'  u 


^.  ^