Skip to main content

Full text of "Investigation of Communist activities in the Newark, N.J., area. Hearings"

See other formats


ys  I 


/  ?/(  2; 


HARVARD  COLLEGE 
LIBRARY 


GIFT  OF  THE 

GOVERNMENT 
OF  THE  UNITED  STATES 


INVESTIGATION  OF  COMMUNIST  ACTIVITIES  IN  THE 
NEWARK,  N.  J.,  AREA  (Supplemental) 


HEARINGS 


BEFORE  THE 


COMMITTEE  ON  UN-AMEEICAN  ACTIVITIES 
HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 


EIGHTY-FIFTH  CONGRESS 

FIRST  SESSION 


JULY  24,  1957 


Printed  for  the  use  of  the  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities 
(INCLUDING  INDEX) 


HARVARD  COLLEGE  LIBRARY 

DEPOSITED  BY  THE 

UNITED  STATES  GOVERNMENT 

SEPb  1957 

UNITED  STATES 
GOVERNJIENT  PRINTING  OFFICE 
95698  WASHINGTON  :   1957 


COMMITTEE  ON  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES 

United  States  House  of  Representati\t:s 

FRANCIS  B.  WALTER,  Pennsylvania,  Chairman 
MORGAN  M.  MOULDER,  Missouri  BERNARD  W.  KEARNEY,  New  York 

CLYDE  DOYLE,  California  DONALD  L.  JACKSON,  California 

JAMES  B.  FRAZIER,  Jr.,  Tennessee  GORDON  H.  SCHERER,  Ohio 

EDWIN  E.  WILLIS,  Louisiana  ROBERT  J.  McINTOSH,  Michigan 

Richard  Aeens,  Director 
n 


CONTENTS 


Page 

Synopsis vn 

July  24, 1957  :  Testimony  of— 

Estelle  Laba 1363 

Perry  Zimmerman 1372 

Index i 

HI 


Public  Law  601,  79th  Congress 

The  legislation  under  which  the  House  Committee  on  Un-American 
Activities  operates  is  Public  Law  601,  79th  Congress  [1946],  chapter 
753,  2d  session,  which  provides : 

Be  it  enacted  ty  the  Senate  and  House  of  Representatives  of  the  United  States 
of  America  in  Congress  assembled,  *  *  * 

PART  2— RULES  OF  THE  HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 

Rule  X 

SEC.   121.    STANDING  COMMITTEES 
*  *  «  4:  *  «  * 

17.  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities,  to  consist  of  nine  Members. 

Rule  XI 

POWEES  AND  DUTIES  OF  COMMITTEES 
******* 

(q)    (1)  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities. 

(A)  Un-American  activities. 

(2)  The  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities,  as  a  vpbole  or  by  subcommit- 
tee, is  authorized  to  make  from  time  to  time  investigations  of  (i)  the  extent, 
character,  and  objects  of  un-American  propaganda  activities  in  the  United  States, 
(ii)  the  diffusion  within  the  United  States  of  subversive  and  un-American  propa- 
ganda that  is  instigated  from  foreign  countries  or  of  a  domestic  origin  and  attacks 
the  principle  of  the  form  of  government  as  guaranteed  by  our  Constitution,  and 
(iii)  all  other  questions  in  relation  thereto  that  would  aid  Congress  in  any  neces- 
sary remedical  legislation. 

The  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities  shall  report  to  the  House  (or  to  the 
Clerk  of  the  House  if  the  House  is  not  in  session)  the  results  of  any  such  investi- 
gation, together  with  such  recommendations  as  it  deems  advisable. 

For  the  purpose  of  any  such  investigation,  the  Committee  on  Un-American 
Activities,  or  any  subcommittee  thereof,  is  authorized  to  sit  and  act  at  such 
times  and  places  within  the  United  States,  whether  or  not  the  House  is  sitting, 
has  recessed,  or  has  adjourned,  to  hold  such  hearings,  to  require  the  attendance 
of  such  witnesses  and  the  production  of  such  books,  papers,  and  documents,  and 
to  take  such  testimony,  as  it  deems  necessary.  Subpenas  may  be  issued  under 
the  signature  of  the  chairman  of  the  committee  or  any  subcommittee,  or  by  any 
member  designated  by  any  such  chairman,  and  may  be  served  by  any  person 
designated  by  any  such  chairman  or  member. 

******* 

Rule  XII 

LEGISLATIVE  OVEBSIGHT  BY  STANDING  COMMITTEES 

Sec.  136.  To  assist  the  Congress  in  appraising  the  administration  of  the  laws 
and  in  developing  such  amendments  or  related  legislation  as  it  may  deem  neces- 
sary, each  standing  committee  of  the  Senate  and  the  House  of  Representatives 
shall  exercise  continuous  watchfulness  of  the  execution  by  the  administrative 
agencies  concerned  of  any  laws,  the  subject  matter  of  which  is  within  the  juris- 
diction of  such  committee ;  and,  for  that  purpose,  shall  study  all  pertinent  re- 
ports and  data  submitted  to  the  Congress  by  the  agencies  in  the  executive  branch 
of  the  Government. 

V 


RULES  ADOPTED  BY  THE  85TH  CONGRESS 

House  Resolution  5,  January  3, 1957 
«  *  »  *  *  *  * 

Rule  X 

STANDING   COMMITTEES 

1.  There  shall  be  elected  by  the  House,  at  the  commencement  of  each  Con- 
gress, 

*  *  *  *  *  «  0 

(q)   Committee  on  Un-American  Activities,  to  consist  of  nine  Members. 
******* 

Rule  XI 

POWEES  AND  DUTIES  OF  COMMITTEES 
******* 

17.  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities. 

(a)  Un-American  activities. 

(b)  The  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities,  as  a  whole  or  by  subcommittee, 
is  authorized  to  make  from  time  to  time  investigations  of  (1)  the  extent,  char- 
acter, and  objects  of  un-American  propaganda  activities  in  the  United  States, 
(2)  the  diffusion  within  the  United  States  of  subversive  and  un-American  projv 
aganda  that  is  instigated  from  foreign  countries  or  of  a  domestic  origin  and 
attacks  the  principle  of  the  form  of  government  as  guaranteed  by  our  Constitu- 
tion, and  (3)  all  other  questions  in  relation  thereto  that  would  aid  Congress 
in  any  necessary  remedial  legislation. 

The  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities  shall  report  to  the  House  (or  to  the 
Clerk  of  the  House  if  the  House  is  not  in  session)  the  results  of  any  such  investi- 
gation, together  with  such  recommendations  as  it  deems  advisable. 

For  the  purpose  of  any  such  investigation,  the  Committee  on  Un-American 
Activities,  or  any  subcommittee  thereof,  is  authorized  to  sit  and  act  at  such  times 
and  places  within  the  United  States,  whether  or  not  the  House  is  sitting,  has 
recessed,  or  has  adjourned,  to  hold  such  hearings,  to  require  the  attendance 
of  such  witnesses  and  the  production  of  such  books,  papers,  and  documents,  and 
to  take  such  testimony,  as  it  deems  necessary.  Subpenas  may  be  issued  under 
the  signature  of  the  chairman  of  the  committee  or  any  subcommittee,  or  by  any 
member  designated  by  any  such  chairman,  and  may  be  served  by  any  person 
designated  by  any  such  chairman  or  member. 

******  0 

26.  To  assist  the  House  in  appraising  the  administration  of  the  laws  and  in 
developing  such  amendments  or  related  legislation  as  it  may  deem  necessary, 
each  standing  committee  of  the  House  shall  exercise  continuous  watchfulness 
of  the  execution  by  the  administrative  agencies  concerned  of  any  laws,  the  subject 
matter  of  which  is  within  the  jurisdiction  of  such  committee ;  and,  for  that 
purpose,  shall  study  all  pertinent  reports  and  data  submitted  to  the  House  by 
the  agencies  in  the  executive  branch  of  the  Government. 


SYNOPSIS 


Under  date  of  May  19,  1955,  Mrs.  Estelle  Laba,  of  Milbum,  N.  J., 
and  Mr.  Perry  Zimmerman,  of  Newark,  N.  J.,  appeared  before  a  sub- 
committee of  the  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities  and,  although 
having  previously  been  identified  in  sworn  testimony  as  one-time  mem- 
bers of  the  Communist  Party,  both  invoked  the  privilege  of  the  fifth 
amendment  against  self-incrimination  when  interrogated  respecting 
Communist  Party  membership  or  activities. 

The  instant  testimony  was  taken  in  executive  session  on  July  24, 
1957,  at  which  time  Mrs.  Laba  and  Mr.  Zimmerman  were  again  in- 
terrogated respecting  certain  statements  allegedly  made  by  them  be- 
fore the  superintendent  of  schools,  board  of  education,  Newark,  N.  J., 
under  date  of  May  16, 1957. 

In  the  instant  testimony,  both  Mrs.  Laba  and  Mr.  Zimmerman  re- 
fused to  divulge  any  significant  information  respecting  the  alleged 
statements  made  by  them  to  the  superintendent  of  schools,  and  invoked 
their  privilege  under  the  fifth  amendment  against  self-incrimination 
with  reference  to  questions  pertaining  to  the  board  of  education's  ad- 
ministrative hearings. 

vn 


INVESTIGATION  OF  COMMUNIST  ACTIVITIES  IN  THE 
NEWARK,  N.  J.,  AREA  (SUPPLEMENTAL) 


WEDNESDAY,   JULY  24,    1957 

United  States  House  of  REPRESEXTATI^^s, 

Subcommittee  of  the 
Committee  on  Un-American  Activities, 

Washington^  D.  C. 

executive  session  ^ 

The  subcommittee  of  the  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities 
met  in  executive  session,  pursuant  to  call  at  2  p.  m.,  in  room  226,  Old 
House  Office  Building,  Washington,  D.  C,  Hon.  Clyde  Doyle  presid- 
ing. 

Committee  members  present :  Representatives  Clyde  Doyle,  of  Cali- 
fornia, and  Gordon  H.  Scherer,  of  Ohio. 

Staff  members  present :  Ricliard  Arens,  director,  and  Raymond  T. 
Collins,  investigator, 

Mr.  Doyle.  The  subcommittee  will  come  to  order. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mrs.  Laba,  would  you  mind  standing  while  the  chair- 
man administers  the  oatli  to  you,  if  you  please  'I 

Mr.  Doyle.  Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  you  will  tell  the  truth,  the 
whole  truth,  and  nothing  but  the  truth,  so  help  you  God  ? 

Mrs.  Laba.  I  do. 

TESTIMONY  OF  MRS.  ESTELLE  LABA,  ACCOMPANIED  BY  COUNSEL, 
WILLIAM  ROSSMOORE 

Mr.  Arens.  Will  you  identify  yourself  by  name,  residence,  and 
occupation  ? 

Mrs.  Laba.  My  name  is  Estelle  Laba.  I  am  at  32  Berkeley  Road, 
Millburn. 

Mr.  Arens.  In  New  Jersey? 

Mrs.  Laba.  Yes,  in  New  Jersey,  and  I  am  unemployed. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  appearing  today,  Mrs.  Laba,  in  response  to 
a  subpena  which  was  served  upon  you  by  the  House  Committee  on 
Un-American  Activities  ? 

Mrs.  Laba.  Yes. 
!      Mr.  Arens.  And  you  are  represented  by  counsel  ? 

Mrs.  Laba.  Yes,  I  am. 

Mr.  Arens.  Counsel,  will  you  kindly  identify  yourself  for  this 
record  ? 


1  Released  by  committee  and  ordered  to  be  printed. 

1363 
95698—57 2 


1364       COMMUNIST  ACTIVITIES  IN  THE  NEWARK,  N.  J.,  AREA 

Mr.  RossMooRE.  William  Rossmoore,  60  Park  Place,  Newark,  N.  J. 

Mr.  Arens.  For  the  purpose  of  further  identification,  are  you  the 
Mrs.  Laba  who  appeared  before  a  subcommittee  of  the  Committee  on 
Un-American  Activities  in  JNlay  of  1955  ? 

Mrs.  Laba.  Yes,  that  is  correct. 

Mr.  AnENS.  Let  the  record  show,  Mr.  Chairman,  that  present  today 
in  this  session,  if  you  please,  are  yourself  as  chairman  of  this  sub- 
committee and  Mr.  Gordon  Scherer,  of  Ohio,  2  of  a  3-member  sub- 
committee which  constitutes  a  quorum,  the  third  member  being  the 
chairman  of  the  full  committee,  Mr.  Walter. 

Mrs.  Laba.  May  I  say  a  few  words  that  I  have  prepared  pertinent 
to  my  appearance  here  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Yes. 

Mrs.  Laba.  I  want  to  make  a  few  comments  on  my  being  called  as  a 
witness  today. 

First,  Raymond  Collins,  an  investigator  for  the  committee,  assured 
me  that  the  committee  does  not  call  witnesses  engaged  in  litigation  and 
tliat  he  M'ould  get  in  touch  with  me  after  my  case  was  settled. 

Nevertheless,  and  contrary  to  policy,  I  was  subpenaed  to  appear.  It 
seems  to  me  that  those  forces  in  the  community  working  against  my 
reinstatement  have  exerted  pressure  to  effect  my  appearance. 

Secondly,  Mr.  Collins  assured  me  that  this  would  be  an  executive 
session  without  any  publicity  whatsoever.  Nevertheless,  a  leak 
occurred  with  resultant  publicity.  Once  before  when  the  committee 
appeared  in  Newark  2  years  ago,  there  was  also  a  leak,  and  names  of 
people  who  had  been  subpenaed  were  published  in  the  local  press. 

I  feel  that  since  the  committee  members  are  undoubtedly  very  careful 
with  information  at  tlieir  disposal,  and  I  have  great  deference  for  the 
committee,  that  an  investigation  might  be  made  as  to  why  these  leaks 
occurred. 

If  the  United  States  marshal's  office  is  at  fault,  then  the  Attorney 
General  might  be  so  informed.  If  not,  some  other  source  might  be 
looked  for. 

In  view  of  these  disclosures  and,  in  addition,  a  leak  that  occurred  on 
testimony  given  to  Dr.  Kennell}^  at  a  private  inquiry  where  it  was 
agreed  that  no  disclosures  would  be  made,  I  am  dubious  that,  however 
well  intentioned  the  committee  may  be,  that  even  this  session  will  be 
completely  secret. 

Third,  I  was  expressly  directed  by  Dr.  Kennelly  not  to  disclose  any 
testimony  given  before  him,  and  I  feel  it  incumbent  upon  me  to  adhere 
to  this  directive. 

Fourth,  the  New  Jersey  State  Supreme  Court  made  it  very  clear  as 
to  what  steps  were  to  be  taken  in  my  case.  These  steps  are  now  in 
progress  and  since  neither  Congress  nor  this  committee  can  exercise 
any  valid  legislative  purpose  in  the  field  of  local  education,  my  forced 
appearance  here  now  serves  no  legislative  function  and  seems  like 
actual  interference  with  State  and  local  authorities. 

Mr.  Arexs.  May  I  make  an  observation  for  this  record. 

It  is  the  information  of  this  committee  that  there  was,  and  perhaps 
is,  in  the  Newark,  N.  J.,  area  a  union  consisting  of  schoolteachers ;  that 
that  union  consisting  of  sclioolteachers  was  heavily  penetrated  by 
members  of  the  Communist  Party. 


COMMUNIST  ACTIVITIES  IN  THE  NEWARK,  N.  J.,  AREA       1365 

This  committee  is  considering  legislation,  with  a  view  toward  pre- 
cluding certain  certifications  of  unions  which  may  be  Communist  con- 
trolled or  penetrated.  It  is  for  that  reason,  among  others,  that  we 
have  invited  you  to  appear  here  today  to  give  us  information  which 
might  be  germane  to  the  consideration  of  such  proposed  legislation. 

I  would  like  to  ask  you  now,  first  of  all,  what  is  this  private  inquiry 
you  were  talking  about  as  you  read  this  statement  a  moment  ago? 
You  referred  to  some  private  inquiry  before  a  Dr.  Kennelly.  What 
was  that  ? 

Mrs.  Laba.  This  was  held  in  Newark.  Dr.  Kennelly  is  superin- 
tendent of  the  Newark  School  S3^stem,  and  it  is  a  matter  of  public  rec- 
ord that  such  an  inquiry  was  held  as  directed  by  the  New  Jersey  State 
Supreme  Court. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  appear  at  that  inquiry  as  a  witness? 

Mrs.  Laba.  I  appeared  at  the  inquiry. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  sworn  at  the  inquiry  ? 

Mrs.  Laba.  In  accordance  with  Dr.  Kennelly's  directives  to  me, 
which  in  turn  Avere  based  on  the  New  Jersey  State  Supreme  Court 
decision,  I  feel  that  I  cannot  disclose  any  information  concerning  the 
inquiry  other  than  what  is  publicly  known,  that  there  was  such  an  in- 
quiry and  that  it  was  held. 

Mr.  Arens.  "Wliere  were  you  when  he  gave  you  these  directives  you 
mentioned  ? 

Mrs.  Laba.  I  was  in  his  office. 

Mr.  Arens.  Was  it  in  the  course  of  this  public  inquiry  that  he 
gave  you  this  directive  ? 

Mr.  Laba.  No.    It  was  at  the  secret,  private  inquiry. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  participate  in  the  secret,  private  inquiry? 

Mrs.  Laba.  I  was  a  witness. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  You  said  that  this  Dr.  Kennelly  was  holding  the 
hearing  at  the  direction  of  the  New  Jersey  Supreme  Court  ? 

Mrs.  Laba.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  I  am  entirely  unfamiliar  with  the  litigation  involved. 
Will  you  tell  us  about  that  directive  and  how  it  arose  ?  That  certainly 
is  a  public  record. 

Mrs.  Laba.  Briefly,  I  am  engaged  in  litigation  to  be  reinstated  as 
a  teacher  in  the  city  of  Newark,  and  in  the  course  of  this  litigation, 
directives  were  issued  in  a  court  order.  Subsequently  an  inquiry  was 
held  by  Dr.  Kennelly. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Is  the  Supreme  Court  of  New  Jersey  your  highest 
court  or  is  it  the  trial  court  ? 

Mrs.  Laba.  Isn't  the  supreme  court  always  the  highest  court  in  the 
State? 

Mr.  ScHERER.  No,  the  Supreme  Court  of  the  State  of  New  York 
is  its  trial  court. 

Mrs.  Laba.  I  don't  know. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Will  counsel  advise  her? 

Mrs.  Laba.  The  supreme  court  is  the  highest  court  in  New  Jersey. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  What  was  the  nature  of  this  directive  that  was 
issued  to  Dr.  Kennelly  ? 

Mrs.  Laba.  Please  rephrase  your  question.  I  don't  know  what  you 
mean. 


I 


1366       COMMUNIST  ACTIVITIES  IN  THE  NEWARK,  N.  J.,  AREA 

Mr.  ScHERER.  You  said  that  the  Supreme  Court  of  New  Jersey 
ordered  Dr.  Kennelly  to  conduct  some  kind  of  a  hearing  or  an  investi- 
gation.   Is  that  what  you  said  ? 

Mrs.  Laba.  Yes. 

]Mr.  ScHERER.  Do  you  know  why  the  supreme  court  made  such  an 
order  and  what  was  the  nature  of  the  order  ?  \Yliy  was  he  to  conduct 
the  hearing? 

Mrs.  Laba.  I  told  you  it  was  in  reference  to  litigation  that  has 
been  going  on. 

Mr.  Aretsts.  ^VhRt  litigation? 

Mrs.  Laba.  And  I  believe  that  the  New  Jersey  State  Supreme  Court 
decision  is  a  matter  of  public  record,  and  you  might  easily  avail 
yourselves  of  it. 

Mr.  ScTiERER.  We  might  get  it.  This  is  the  first  time  I  have  heard 
of  it.    I  just  want  you  to  tell  me  what  it  is.    Do  you  not  know? 

Mrs.  Laba.  I  am  not  so  informed  on  legal  matters — I  do  not  feel 
that  I  can  tell  you  exactly  what  the  directive  stated. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Tell  us  what  you  understand  about  it.  I  might  want 
to  ask  some  questions  and  I  might  be  better  able  to  ask  those  ques- 
tions if  I  know  the  nature  of  the  hearing  and  how  it  came  about. 

Mrs.  Laba.  The  New  Jersey  State  Supreme  Court,  after  listening 
to  my  case  sometime  last  winter — and  this,  of  course,  I  am  express- 
ing as  well  as  I  can 

Mr.  ScHERER.  We  understand  that. 

Mrs.  Laba.  Issued  a  directive  that  was  to  the  effect  that  my  dis- 
missal had  been  illegal  and  that  the  case  Avas  to  go  back  to  the  local 
authorities  and  that  an  investigation  be  made  by  Dr.  Kennelly  as  to 
my  fitness  in  various  areas. 

In  fact,  his  recommendation  would,  in  turn,  be  given  to  the  local 
board  of  education  for  disposal  of  the  case.  That  litigation  is  now 
pending.  Dr.  Kennelly's  report,  as  a  result  of  the  inquiry,  has  not 
3'et  been  given  to  the  board  to  my  knowledge. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  interrogated  by  Dr.  Kennelly  while  you 
were  under  oath  ? 

JNIrs.  Laba.  I  beg  your  pardon  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  interrogated  by  Dr.  Kennelly  while 

Mrs.  Laba.  I  am  sorry,  but  Dr.  Kennelly  directed  me  without 
equivocation  to  disclose  no  matter  relevant  to  that  inquiry. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  a  participant  in  the  inquiry  ? 

Mrs.  Laba.  Yes,  that  is  a  matter  of  public  record. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  a  witness  in  the  inquiry  ? 

Mrs.  Laba.  I  again  have  to  state  that  Dr.  Kennelly  directed  that 
no  material  relevant  to  the  inquiry  be  disclosed. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Did  you  not  testify  a  few  minutes  ago  that  you  were 
a  witness  at  the  inquiry  ? 

Mrs.  Laba.  I  don't  recall. 

Mr.  Scherer.  My  recollection  is  that  she  did.  Nevertheless,  Mr. 
Chairman,  I  ask  that  you  direct  the  witness  to  answer  the  question. 
She  injected  the  hearing  and  voluntarily  called  our  attention  to  this 
hearing  as  a  basis  for  her  refusal  to  answer,  and  I  think  we  have  a 
right,  then,  to  ask  her  about  it. 

In  fact,  the  question  now  before  us  does  not  even  ask  for  an  answer 
to  what  she  said.     It  merely  is  a  question  of  whether  she  ever  partici- 


COMMUNIST  ACTIVITIES  IN  THE  NEWARK,  N.  J.,  AREA       1367 

pated  in  the  hearing  which  she  is  using  for  the  basis  of  refusing  to 
answer  our  questions. 

If  she  wishes  to  use  that  basis  for  refusal  to  answer,  she  has  to  at 
least  tell  us  whether  she  was  a  witness  or  participant  in  the  hearing. 

Mrs.  Laba.  I  was  a  participant  at  the  hearing  conducted  by  Dr. 
Kennelly. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  did  you  do  as  a  participant  ?     Did  you  testify  ? 

Mrs.  Laba.  I  do  not  believe  that  that  question  is  relevant  and  have 
to  rely  on  my  rights  under  the  provisions  of  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Doyle.  What  do  you  mean  by  a  participant  ? 

Mrs.  Laba.  A  participant  is  a  person  who  takes  some  part  in  an 
affair. 

Mr.  Doyle.  What  was  your  action?  How  did  you  participate? 
What  did  you  do  ? 

Mrs.  Laba.  I  am  sorry,  but  I  will  have  to  rely  on  my  constitutional 
rights. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  I  ask  that  you  direct  the  witness  to  answer  the  ques- 
tion. 

Mr.  Doyle.  I  instruct  you  to  answer  the  question  as  to  what  you  did 
to  participate  in  the  hearing.  You  have  testified  that  you  partici- 
pated. Now,  what  did  you  do  ?  Did  you  answer  questions  asked  by 
Dr.  Kennelly  ? 

Mrs.  Laba.  I  do  not  believe  this  question  has  any  relevance  to  the 
real  function  of  this  committee  and,  in  addition,  I  shall  have  to  invoke 
my  constitutional  rights. 

Mr.  Doyle.  I  think  it  is  a  preliminary  question,  preliminary  to  other 
questions  which  we  shall  ask  you. 

Mr.  Scherer.  May  I  further  say,  Mr.  Chairman,  as  I  said  before,  so 
the  record  is  clear  and  so  there  is  no  misunderstanding,  it  was  this 
Avitness  who  mentioned  the  hearing  and  used  it  as  a  basis  for  refusing 
to  answer  questions. 

Since  she  raised  the  issue  voluntarily,  we  have  a  right  to  know  the 
nature  of  the  hearing  and  the  extent  of  the  hearings  as  a  basis  for 
judging  whether  she  is  invoking  the  reason  as  a  refusal  for  not 
answering  correctly. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Did  you  hear  Mr.  Scherer's  comment  ? 

ISIrs.  Laba.  To  some  extent.  I  am  sorry,  but  I  did  not  hear  the 
entire  comment.  I  have  a  hearing  aid  on,  but  it  is  not  working  too 
well. 

Mr.  Scherer.  You  were  directed  to  answer  whether  or  not  you  were 
a  witness  at  this  hearing  before  Dr.  Kennelly  and  to  answer  in  what 
manner  you  participated  in  this  hearing. 

You  have  refused  to  answer  that  question,  invoking  the  fifth  amend- 
ment. I  have  said  that  the  committee  does  not  accept  your  answer. 
One  of  the  reasons  we  do  not  accept  your  answer  is  the  fact  that  you 
yourself  injected  this  hearing  before  Dr.  Kennelly  into  the  testimony 
and  gave  it  as  a  reason  for  your  refusal  to  answer  questions. 

Mrs.  Laba.  I  am  not  giving  that  as  the  reason  for  my  refusal  to 
answer  questions.  I  am  pointing  out,  however,  that  this  is  one  of  the 
background  conditions  that  exists. 

I  further  invoke  the  fifth  amendment  and  also  pointed  out  that  I 
feel  that  your  question  has  no  relevancy  to  the  legal  functions  of  the 
committee. 


1368       COMMUNIST  ACTIVITIES  IN  THE  NEWARK,  N.  J.,  AREA 

Mr.  Arens.  Wlio  else  participated  in  this  hearing  besides  yourself 
and  Dr.  Kennelly  ? 

Mrs.  Laba.  I  will  have  to  give  you  the  same  answer  as  I  have  just 
stated. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  I  ask  you  to  direct  the  witness  to  answer  the  question. 

Mr.  Doyle.  I  direct  you  to  answer  the  question,  Witness.  I  think 
you  have  made  it  clear  to  us  that  the  hearing  involved  your  application 
to  the  Supreme  Court  of  New  Jersey  for  reinstatement  as  a  teacher 
in  the  Newark  School  System,  is  that  not  true  ? 

Mrs.  Laba.  Yes. 

Mr.  Doyle.  And  that  your  ayjplication  for  reinstatement  as  a  school- 
teacher in  the  Newark  School  System  resulted  from  your  release  or  dis- 
charge or  suspension  from  the  Newark  School  System,  growing  out  of 
the  hearings  in  Newark  about  which  our  counsel  calls  your  attention 
in  which  you  were  a  witness  before  the  committee. 

Is  that  not  true  ? 

Mrs.  Laba.  I  did  not  state  all  that,  I  do  not  believe,  but  that  is  sub- 
stantially true. 

Mr.  Doyle.  You  then  were  suspended,  were  you  not,  by  the  school 
authorities  of  New^ark  from  the  ]^osition  as  a  schoolteacher  on  account 
of  the  actions  you  took  before  the  subcommittee  of  this  House  Com- 
mittee on  Un-American  Activities  at  those  Newark  hearings.  Is  that 
not  true  ? 

Mrs.  Laba.  I  believe  so. 

Mr.  Doyle.  I  asked  you  those  questions  because  I  think  your  testi- 
mony showed  that  and  my  own  knowledge  of  those  hearings,  because 
I  was  present  at  those  hearings  as  a  member  of  that  subcommittee  at 
which  you  testified,  as  I  recall. 

Later,  I  was  informed  that  you  were  suspended  by  the  board  on 
account  of  your  claiming  of  the  constitutional  privilege  or  other 
actions  before  the  committee  at  that  time.  I  have  asked  those  ques- 
tions to  lay  the  groundwork  for  j^our  furtlier  understanding  as  to 
why  we  are  questioning  you  now  at  this  hearing. 

Mrs.  Laba.  It  is  not  quite  clear  yet. 

Well,  what  is  your  next  question  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  tell  the  truth  in  the  hearing  that  you  had 
with  Dr.  Kennelly  ? 

Mrs.  Laba.  I  am  sorry  but  I  cannot  divulge  information  relative  to 
that  inquiry. 

Mr.  Arens.  This  question  does  not  ask  j^ou  to  divulge  the  facts  of 
the  inquiry.  We  may  get  into  that  later.  I  am  just  asking  you  in 
that  inquiry  in  which  you  were  a  participant,  did  you  tell  the  truth? 

Mrs.  Laba.  I  will  have  to  rely  on  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Scherer.  I  ask  that  you  direct  the  witness  to  answer  that  ques- 
tion. The  witness  has  injected  that  matter  into  the  hearing.  If  she 
had  any  right  to  invoke  the  fifth  amendment,  she  certainly  has  waived 
it.     She  injected  into  this  hearing  the  hearing  before  Dr.  Kennelly. 

Mrs.  Laba.  I  fail  to  see  how  this  question  is  relevant  or  pertinent  to 
any  legislation  function  that  this  committee  maj'  have  and,  in  addi- 
tion, I  will  have  to  rely  on  my  constitutional  rights. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  would  like  to  have  the  record  clear  on  this  thing. 

Mrs.  Laba,  do  you  honestly  feel  that  if  you  told  this  committee  now 
whether  or  not  you  told  the  truth  in  the  hearing  before  Dr.  Kennelly, 


COMMUNIST  ACTIVITIES  IN  THE  NEWARK,  N.  J.,  AREA       1369 

you  would  be  giving  information  which  might  be  used  against  you  in 
a  criminal  proceeding  ?    Do  you  imderstand  the  question  ? 

Mrs.  Laba.  No,  please  restate  it. 

Mr.  Arens.  The  principal  question  was,  did  you  tell  the  truth  when 
you  participated  in  the  hearing  before  Dr.  Kennelly,  and  you  have 
invoked  the  fifth  amendment  on  that. 

Now,  I  want  to  know  if  you  honestly  feel  that  if  you  told  us 
whether  you  told  the  truth  in  your  hearing  before  Dr.  Kennelly, 
you  would  be  supplying  information  that  could  be  used  against  you 
in  a  criminal  proceeding  ? 

Mrs.  Laba.  Again,  I  will  have  to  rely  on  my  constitutional  rights. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  I  ask  the  chairman  to  direct  the  witness  to  answer 
that  question. 

Mr.  Doyle.  I  direct  you  to  answer  that  question.  What  is  your 
answer  to  ni}^  direction  that  you  answer  that  question  as  to  whether 
or  not  you  told  the  truth  when  you  participated  as  a  witness  at  the 
hearing  before  Superintendent  Kennelly  ? 

Mrs.  Laba.  I  would  like  to  point  out  again  that  I  feel  that  this 
particular  question  has  no  relevancy  to  the  question  which  this  com- 
mittee has  been  legally  set  up,  and,  in  addition,  I  will  have  to  rely 
on  my  constitutional  rights  and  invoke  the  fifth  amendment,  in  spite 
of  the  fact  that  I  have  the  greatest  deference  for  this  committee. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Mr.  Arens  asked  you  another  question.  He  said 
to  you :  Do  you  in  good  faith  believe  that  if  you  answered  the  ques- 
tion as  to  whether  or  not  you  told  the  truth  in  the  hearing  before 
Dr.  Kennelly,  you  Avould  be  supplying  information  that  might  lead 
to  a  criminal  prosecution  ? 

That  question  the  courts  have  said  you  must  answer  either  "yes" 
or  "no." 

Mr.  Arens.  The  purpose  of  the  testimony  is  to  test  her  good  faith 
in  the  invocation  of  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mrs.  Laba.  I  should  like  to  give  the  same  answer  to  this  question, 
if  it  is  directed  that  I  answer,  that  I  have  given  to  the  other  questions. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  suggest  the  record  reflect  an  order  and  a  direction  to 
her  to  answer. 

Mr.  Doyle.  We  heard  your  answer  just  given.  I  want  again  to 
make  it  clear  to  you  that  I  am  directing  you  to  answer  the  question 
which  Mr.  Arens,  our  director,  asked  you.  That  is,  I  want  to  make 
it  clear  on  the  record  and  to  you  that  I  am  directing  you  to  answer 
that  question  which  Mr.  Arens,  our  director,  asked  you. 

Mrs.  Laba.  I  wish  to  state  that  I  feel  that  this  committee's  question 
has  no  relevancy  to  the  matter  or  matters  for  which  the  committee 
has  been  set  up  and  I  wish,  at  the  same  time,  to  invoke  my  constitu- 
tional rights  under  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Then  I  would  like  to  ask  the  converse  of  that  question. 
I  want  you  to  understand  what  the  question  is  going  to  be  now. 

I  have  asked  you,  in  effect,  if  you  told  the  truth  in  the  hearing  be- 
fore INIr.  Kennelly.  Now,  I  am  going  to  ask  you  the  converse  of  that 
question.     There  is  no  other  way  to  put  it  than  the  simple  language : 

Did  you  lie  before  the  Kennelly  hearing  ? 

Mrs.  Laba.  My  answer  is  the  same. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  honestly  believe  in  good  faith  that  if  you  told 
us  now  whether  or  not  you  lied  when  you  appeared  and  participated 


I 


1370       COMMUNIST  ACTIVITIES  IN  THE  NEWARK,  N.  J.,  AREA 

in  the  hearing  before  Dr.  Kennelly,  you  would  be  supplying  informa- 
tion which  might  be  used  against  you  in  the  criminal  proceeding  ? 

Mrs.  Laba.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  beg  to  differ  with  you. 

Mrs.  Laba.  I  wish  to  state  again  that  I  feel  that  the  question  is  not 
pertinent  to  the  matters  for  which  the  committee 

Mr.  ScHERER.  Let  me  interrupt  you. 

Obviously,  Mr.  Arens'  last  question  has  no  pertinency  to  any  legis- 
lative purpose.  He  was  merely  asking  you  if  you  were  invoking  the 
fifth  amendment  in  good  faith.  He  was  not  asking  you  anything  else 
other  than  if  you  were  honestly  invoking  the  fifth  amendment, 
whether  you  honestly  believed  that  to  tell  us  whether  you  lied  would 
lead  to  a  criminal  prosecution. 

All  we  want  to  know  is  if  you  are  honestly  invoking  the  fifth 
amendment,  whether  you  obviously  believe  what  you  have  said.  That 
is  to  test  your  credibility,  and  the  courts  have  said  that  to  that  ques- 
tion you  would  obviously  say  "Yes,"  if  you  thought  it  would  lead 
to  criminal  prosecution.  It  has  nothing  to  do  with  the  subject  of  the 
investigation. 

Mrs.  Laba.  I  wish  to  state  that  I  am  honestly  invoking  the  fifth 
amendment  and,  at  the  same  time,  I  feel  that  the  question  has  no 
relevancy. 

Mr.  Arens.  See  if  you  can  help  me  on  this:  I  want  to  be  sure  I 
understand  the  status  of  the  record. 

I  have  asked  you,  first  of  all,  if  you  told  Dr.  Kennelly  the  truth  in 
this  hearing,  and  you  invoked  the  fifth  amendment.  I  then  asked 
you  whether  or  not  you  invoked  the  fifth  amendment  in  good  faith, 
and  you  again  invoked  the  fifth  amendment. 

I  then  asked  you  if  you  lied  to  Dr.  Kennelly  and  you  have  invoked 
the  fifth  amendment.  I  asked  you  if  you  invoked  the  fifth  amend- 
ment in  good  faith,  and  you  invoked  the  fifth  amendment  again. 

I  am  now  asking  you  another  question:  Is  there  something  you 
said,  or  failed  to  say,  in  your  appearance  before  Dr.  Kennelly  in  this 
proceeding  which  was  untruthful  ? 

Mrs.  Laba.  May  I  point  out  that  I  did  state  that  I  invoked  the  fifth 
amendment  in  good  faith  and  honestly.  I  did  state  that  and  I  do  not 
believe  you  were  aware  of  that. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  understand  this  question  does  not  ask  you  what 
you  said  to  Dr.  Kennelly.  The  question  is,  did  you  tell  him  the  truth 
or  did  you  lie  ? 

Mrs.  Laba.  Yes,  I  understand  this  question,  but  I  was  just  pointing 
out  that  I  did  not  invoke  the  fifth  amendment  when  you  asked  if  I  had 
invoked  the  fifth  amendment  honestly  in  good  faith. 

Mr.  Arens.  Then  I  take  it  if  you  told  us  whether  or  not  you  lied  to 
Dr.  Kennelly,  you  would  be  supplying  information  that  could  be  used 
against  you  in  a  criminal  proceeding? 

Mrs.  Laba.  Again,  I  will  have  to  invoke  the  fifth  amendment  and 
also  point  out  that  this  question  has  no  relevancy  to  the  legislative 
purpose  for  which  the  committee  has  been  set  up. 

Mr.  Doyle.  In  view  of  the  fact  that  you  keep  on  repeating  that 
these  questions  liave  no  relevancy  to  the  purpose  for  which  this  com- 
mittee was  set  up  by  Congress,  my  question  is  directed  to  you  par- 
ticularly on  that  point.     You  keep  on  mentioning  that  you  do  not 


COMMUNIST  ACTIVITIES  IN  THE  NEWARK,  N.  J.,  AREA       1371 

tliink  it  has  any  relevancy  or  pertinency.  You  heard  Mr.  Arens 
when  the  hearings  first  began  state  the  purpose  of  tliis  hearing,  that 
it  was  based  upon  the  fact  that  we  were  informed  that  there  was  a 
labor  union  in  Newark  made  up,  or  largely  made  up,  of  schoolteachers 
who  were  members  of  the  Communist  Party,  did  you  not  ?  Did  you 
hear  him  state  that  ? 

Mrs.  Laba.  Yes,  I  heard  Mr.  Arens'  opening  statement. 

Mr.  Doyle.  And  you  heard  him  state  that  in  substance  about  the 
union  ? 

Mrs.  Laba.  I  think  that  is  approximately. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Then  you  heard  him  state,  too,  that  in  connection  with 
that  statement  that  we  were  questioning  you  because  the  question  of 
possible  legislation  is  involved,  involving  labor  unions  which  may  be 
dominated  or  controlled  by  Communists. 

Mrs.  Laba.  Yes ;  I  have  heard  that. 

Mr.  Doyle.  The  reason  for  asking  you  these  questions  is  to  point  out 
the  relevancy  and  pertinency  of  these  questions  which  go  into  the  facts 
surromiding  questions  of  fact. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  have  told  us  a  little  about  the  nature  of  the  pro- 
ceeding. Could  you  help  us  on  this '.  If  a  person  in  that  type  of  pro- 
ceeding falsifies,  deliberately  misrepresents  the  facts,  is  that  person 
subject  to  a  perjury  prosecution?     Could  you  tell  us? 

Mrs.  Laba.  I  have  no  idea.  I  do  not  have  very  good  legal  knowl- 
edge. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  perjure  yourself  before  the  Kennelly  inquiry  ? 

Mrs.  Laba.  I  am  sorry,  but  I  feel  that  this  question  also  is  irrele- 
vant with  respect  to  the  purpose  for  which  the  committee  was  set  up, 
and  again  will  have  to  invoke  my  constitutional  rights. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  the  proceed- 
ing today  now  be  recessed  and  that  the  witness  be  maintained  under 
the  subpena  which  was  served  upon  her,  subject  to  determination  of  a 
time  for  further  interrogation. 

Perhaps  the  chairman  would  prefer  to  have  a  date  set  for  her 
reappearance. 

Mr.  Doyle.  We  are  discussing  the  matter  of  a  date.  It  seems  neces- 
sary to  recess  this  hearing  at  this  time  and  have  it  continued  until  a 
later  date.  We  are  sorry  for  the  inconvenience  it  causes  you  and  your 
counsel. 

There  is  a  major  debate  on  the  floor  of  the  House  involved,  too,  and 
we  are  going  to  try  to  fix  a  date. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  would  respectfully  suggest  that  you  fix  the  day  for 
her  appearance,  continuing  under  this  subpena,  on  Wednesday, 
August  7,  at  10  a.  m. 

Mr.  Doyle.  We  are  discussing  August  7,  and  I  am  going  to  ask 
counsel  if  that  is  satisfactory  to  him,  also. 

Mr.  Rossmoore.  I  am  not  her  regular  counsel.  Her  regular  counsel 
requested  me  to  go  here  because  he  had  a  case  which  he  could  not 
postpone.  I  will  be  out  of  town  on  August  7  and  I  would  prefer  not 
to  interrupt  that  schedule  to  be  here. 

Mrs.  Laba.  I  believe  my  regular  attorney  will  be  out  of  town  on 
that  date. 

Mr.  Arens.  Wlio  is  your  regular  attorney  ? 

Mrs.  Laba.  Emil  Oxfeld.  I  would  appreciate  it  if  you  could  recess 
this  until  your  early  convenience  in  September  because  he  usually 


1372       COMMUNIST  ACTIVITIES  IN  THE  NEWARK,  N.  J.,  AREA 

takes  the  month  of  August  off,  and  I  believe  he  has  already  made 
arrangements  to  be  out  of  town. 

Mr.  Doyle.  In  view  of  that  fact  that  your  counsel  is  engaged  on 
August  7  and  you  have  made  the  request  that  we  fix  a  date  agreeable 
to  your  regular  counsel,  would  it  be  satisfactory  to  you.  Witness,  and 
to  you,  Counsel,  if  we  continue  the  subpena  in  full  force  and  effect 
until  our  director  and  counsel  arrange  some  date  with  your  regular 
counsel  which  is  satisfactory  to  both  our  committee  and  to  j-our  reg- 
ular counsel  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Could  you  help  us,  too,  by  giving  us  the  address  of 
your  counsel  if  you  know  it  offhand  ? 

Mr.  RossMOORE.  It  is  744  Broad  Street,  Newark. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Is  that  satisfactory  to  both  of  you  ? 

Mrs.  Laba.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  EossMOORE.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Doyle.  We  will  let  the  subpena  remain  in  full  force  and 
effect.  It  means  you  are  still  under  subpena.  It  might  be  3  or  4 
or  5  or  6  weeks  before  you  are  called  back,  but  we  will  not  have  to 
resubpena  you.  We  will  not  have  to  serve  you  with  any  more  papers 
to  appear. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  In  view  of  the  fact  that  she  says  that  her  counsel 
is  unable  to  appear  on  the  date  we  suggest,  it  is  an  accommodation 
to  her. 

Mr.  RossMOORE.  I  appreciate  the  committee's  cooperation  with 
counsel. 

(The  witness  was  temporarily  excused.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  there  is  another  witness  to  be  heard. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Zimmerman,  will  you  remain  standing  while  the 
chairman  administers  an  oath  to  you  ? 

Mr.  Doyle.  Do  you  swear  that  the  testimony  you  are  about  to  give 
will  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and  nothing  but  the  truth  so  help 
you  God  ? 

Mr.  Zimmerman.  I  do. 

TESTIMONY  OF  PERRY  ZIMMERMAN,  ACCOMPANIED  BY  COUNSEL, 

RICHARD  P.  GREEN 

Mr.  Arens.  Kindly  identify  yourself  by  name,  residence,  and  oc- 
cupation. 

Mr.  Zimmerman.  My  name  is  Perry  Zimmerman.  My  address  is 
58  Norwood  Street,  Newark,  N.  J.     I  was  a  teacher. 

Mr.  Arens.  Your  present  occupation  ? 

Mr.  Zimmerman.  I  am  a  draftsman. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  appearing  today  in  response  to  a  subpena 
which  was  served  upon  you  by  the  House  Committee  on  Un-Ameri- 
can Activities  ? 

Mr.  Zimmerman.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  represented  by  counsel  ? 

Mr.  Zimmerman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  Counsel,  kindly  identify  yourself. 

Mr.  Green.  Richard  F.  Green,  No.  7  West  Grant  Street,  Eliza- 
beth, N.  J. 


COMMUNIST  ACTIVITIES  IN  THE  NEWARK,  N.  J.,  AREA       1373 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  the  same  Perry  Zimmerman,  for  purposes 
of  identification,  who  appeared  before  the  Committee  on  Un-Ameri- 
can Activities  in  Newark,  N.  J.,  in  May  of  1965  ? 

Mr.  Zimmerman.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Akens.  Are  you  the  same  Perry  Zimmerman  who  appeared 
before  the  superintendent  of  the  Board  of  Education  of  Newark,  N.  J., 
on  May  16,  1957,  in  an  inquiry  conducted  by  the  superintendent  of 
the  Board  of  Education  of  Newark,  N.  J.  ? 

Mr.  Green.  It  is  not  the  superintendent  of  the  board.  It  is  the 
superintendent  of  schools.     That  is  his  correct  title. 

Mr.  Arens.  Tliank  you  for  the  correction,  counsel. 

Mr.  Zimmerman,  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens,  Where  were  you  last  employed  in  the  school  system? 

Mr.  Zimmerman,  In  Newark,  N.  J. 

Mr.  Arens,  In  what  capacity  were  you  employed  ^ 

Mr.  Zimmerman.  A  teacher  of  mathematics  in  grades  6  and  7. 

Mr,  Arens.  What  occasioned  your  disassociation  from  the  school 
system  ? 

Mr.  Zimmerman,  A  suspension, 

Mr,  Arens,  Upon  what  grounds  ? 

Mr.  Zimmerman,  On  the  grounds  that  I  had  appeared  before  this 
committee  and  had  availed  myself  of  the  rights  as  guaranteed  to  me 
by  the  fifth  amendment, 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  testify  before  the  superintendent  of  schools 

Mr,  Green,  He  is  a  civil-service  employee  of  the  board  of  education, 
which  happens  to  be  a  separate  corporation  under  New  Jersey  law, 

Mr,  Arens.  Did  you  testify  before  Dr,  Kennelly  on  May  16,  1957? 

Mr,  Zimmerman,  May  I  consult  with  my  counsel? 

Mr,  Arens.  Yes,  sir, 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel,) 

Mr,  Zimmerman,  Without  waiver  of  rights  guaranteed  to  me  by 
tlie  fifth  amendment,  I  did  so, 

Mr,  Arens.  Were  you  sworn  in  that  proceeding  ? 

Mr.  Zimmerman.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  your  statements  made  on  that  occasion  truthful 
statements  ? 

Mr.  Zimmerman.  I  am  declining  to  ansv^er  that  question,  sir,  on 
the  basis  of  my  rights  mider  the  fifth  amendment  and  also  because  the 
business  of  education  in  the  State  of  New  Jersey  is  not  a  proper  mat- 
ter for  this  committee. 

Mr.  Arens.  At  that  point  I  should  like  to  advise  you,  first  of  all,  that 
this  committee  has  under  consideration  possible  legislation  under- 
taking to  cope  with  the  problem  created  by  Communist  penetration 
of  teachers"  unions,  as  well  as  other  unions. 

It  is  the  information  of  the  committee,  and  the  suggestion  has  been 
made  to  the  committee,  that  you  might  have  information  on  that  sub- 
ject matter  and  that  is  why  we  feel  that  these  questions  are  pertinent. 

Do  you  honestly  feel,  Mr.  Zimmerman,  that  if  you  told  us  now 
truthfully  whether  or  not  you  told  the  truth  in  the  proceeding  before 
Dr.  Kennelly  of  May  16,  1957,  jou  would  be  supplying  information 
which  might  be  used  against  you  in  a  criminal  proceeding  ? 


I 


1374       COMMUNIST  ACTIVITIES  IN  THE  NEWARK,  N.  J.,  AREA 

Mr.  Zimmerman.  I  wish  my  two  previous  answers  to  stand  and  also, 
in  addition  to  that,  I  wish  to  state  that  at  the  present  time  I  am  en- 
gaged in  litigation  with  the  board  of  education  and  I  do  not  wish  to 
answer  that  question  any  further. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  request  an  order  and  a 
direction  to  the  witness  to  answer  the  question  whether  or  not  he 
honestly  contends  that  if  he  answered  the  principal  outstanding  ques- 
tion, he  might  be  supplying  information  that  would  be  used  against 
him  in  a  criminal  proceeding. 

Mr.  Doyle.  We  cannot  accept  your  previous  answer  as  sufficient, 
and  I  direct  you  to  answer  the  question. 

Mr.  Zimmerman.  I  wish  to  stand  on  my  rights  as  guaranteed  by 
the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Do  you  really  understand  the  question  Mr.  Arens 
was  asking  you?  He  was  merely  asking  you  if  you  were  invoking 
the  fifth  amendment  in  good  faith,  whether  you  honestly  believe  in 
your  own  mind  that  to  answer  the  question  as  to  whether  you  told 
the  truth  before  Dr.  Kennelly  might  lead  to  a  criminal  prosecution. 

Mr.  Zimmerman.  I  wish  my  answer  to  stand,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  want  to  ask  you  the  converse  of  that  question.  When 
you  were  sworn  and  testified  before  Dr.  Kennelly  in  those  proceed- 
ings, did  you  lie  ? 

Mr.  Zimmerman.  Again,  I  wish  to  avail  myself  of  my  constitu- 
tional privilege. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  honestly  feel  if  you  told  us  whether  or  not  you 
lied  to  Dr.  Kennelly,  you  would  be  supplying  information  which 
might  be  used  against  you  in  a  criminal  proceeding  ? 

Mr.  Zimmerman.  Again  for  the  three  reasons  which  I  previously 
stated,  I  decline  to  answer  the  question. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  on  this  last  ques- 
tion he  be  ordered  and  directed  to  answer  the  question. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Yes,  I  order  and  direct  the  witness  to  answer  that  last 
question.    The  committee  cannot  accept  your  last  answer  as  sufficient. 

Mr.  Scherer.  May  I  supplement  that  by  saying,  in  effect,  Mr.  Arens 
is  asking  you  if  you  are  invoking  the  fifth  amendment  in  good  faith. 
That  is  all  he  is  asking  you,  in  substance. 

Mr.  Zimmerman.  I  wish  my  answer  to  stand. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  respectfully  suggest  this  witness  be  continued  under 
subpena  and  that  the  proceedings  be  suspended  today  and  that  the 
time  and  place  for  a  subsequent  hearing  be  communicated  to  his  coun- 
sel at  a  later  date. 

Mr.  Doyle.  This  hearing  will  be  continued  until  a  later  date,  and 
the  date  will  be  arranged  with  your  counsel.  Therefore,  the  subpena 
will  stand  in  full  force  and  it  will  be  unnecessary  to  resubpena  you 
for  the  next  appearance ;  is  that  satisfactory,  INIr,  Green  ? 

Mr.  Green.  You  put  me  on  the  spot.  Congressman.  We  recognize 
the  order  of  the  committee. 

Mr.  Arens.  Kindly  give  us  on  this  record  your  telephone  number 
and  address.  I  believe  you  told  me  on  the  phone  the  other  day,  but 
I  would  like  to  have  it  on  this  record. 


COMMUNIST  ACTIVITIES  EST  THE  NEWARK,  N.  J.,  AREA       1375 

Mr.  Green.  I  can  best  be  reached  at  the  telephone  number  of  my 
associate,  Myles  C.  Morrison,  whose  number  is  Elizabeth  2-7968. 
My  own  number  which  is  on  answering  service  is  Elizabeth  2-1518. 

Mr.  Doyle.  The  committee  will  stand  m  recess. 

(Whereupon,  at  3 :25  p.  m.,  Wednesday,  July  24,  1957,  the  hearing 
in  the  above-entitled  matter  was  recessed,  subject  to  the  call  of  the 
Chair.) 


INDEX 


iNorv^muALS 

Page 

Oreen,  Richard  F 1372 

Kennelly,  Edward  F 1364-1371,  1373,  1374 

Laba,  Estelle 1363-1372   (testimony) 

Morrison,  Myles  C 1375 

Oxfeld,  Emil 1371 

Rossmoore,  William 1363 

Zimmerman,  Perry 1372-1374  (testimony) 

Organizations 

Newark  (N.  J.)  Board  of  Education ,___  1366,  1373 

Newark  (N.  J.)  School  System 1365,  1368,  1373 

i 

o 


BOSTON  PUBLIC  LIBRARY 


3  9999  05706  3172 


U 
d 
e 

% 
I 


^%9n  -