Skip to main content

Full text of "Investigation of communism in the Metropolitan Music School, inc., and related fields. Hearings"

See other formats


^iliiili 


■i 


HARVARD  COLLEGE 
LIBRARY 


GIFT  OF  THE 

GOVERNMENT 
OF  THE  UNITED  STATES 


/ 

7 


INVESTIGATION  OF  COMMUNISM  IN  THE  METROPOLITAN 
MUSIC  SCHOOL,  INC.,  AND  REUTED  FIELDS— PART  1 


HEARINGS 


BEFORE  THE 


COMMITTEE  ON  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES 
HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 


EIGHTY-FIFTH  CONGRESS 

FIRST  SESSION 


APRIL  9  AND  10,  1957 


Printed  for  the  use  of  tbe  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities 


INDEX  IN  PART  2 


UNITED  STATES 
GOVERNMENT  PRINTING  OFFICE 
91198  WASHINGTON  :  1957 

-   .  --    L;   T;,£ 
UNI  I  ED  STATES  GOVERNMENT 


JUL  101957 


COMMITTEE  ON  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES 

United  States  House  of  Representatives 
FRANCIS  E.  WALTER,  Pennsylvania,  Chairman 
MORGAN  M.  MOULDER,  Missouri  BERNARD  W.  KEARNEY,  New  York 

CLYDE  DOYLE,  California  DONALD  L.  JACKSON,  California 

JAMES  B.  FRAZIER,  JR.^  Tennessee  GORDON  H.  SCHERER,  Ohio 

EDWIN  E.  WILLIS,  Louisiana  ROBERT  J.  McINTOSH,  Michigan 

Richard  Arbns,  Director 
II 


CONTENTS 


Page 

Sy  nopsis VII 

Executive  Hearings  (See  Part  2)^ 

Februarv  7,  1957:  Testimony  of — • 

■  Fred  Hellerman 871 

February  8,  1957:  Testimony  of — ■ 

"  George  Koukly 877 

Jesse  L.  Solomon 880 

Part  1 

April  9,  1957:  Testimony  of — ■ 

Lilly  Popper 613 

Leonard  Cherlin 627 

Lilly  Popper  (resumed) 627 

Leonard  Clierlin  (resumed) 628 

John  Kenneth  Ackley 641 

Wallingf ord  Riegger , 647 

John  Lautner 650 

Wallingf  ord  Riegger  (resumed) 651 

Afternoon  session: 

Wallingf  ord  Riegger  (resumed) 654 

Robert  Claibornel 658 

Sidney  Finkelstein 672 

Henrv  Zlotnick  (Zlotnik) 680 

Walter  Raim  (Walter  Yudomin) 681 

Max  PoUikoff 682 

Maurine  Holbert 685 

John  F.  Mehegan 690 

Harry  M.  Smyles 692 

April  10,  1957:  Testimony  of — ■ 

Thelma  Pyle„_l 703 

Lucy  Brown 705 

Mildred  Hagler 712 

Frank  Schwartz 716 

Dayid  Walter 725 

Afternoon  session: 

Elay  ne  Jones 745 

Sam  Morgenstern 749 

Max  Hollander 753 

Alan  Booth 757 

Part  2 
April  11,  1957:  Testimony  of — 

Max  Marlin  .._1 762 

Louis  Graeler 770 

Viyian  Riykin 775 

Earl  Robinson 776 

Afternoon  session: 

James  CoUis 793 

Oakley  C.  Johnson 794 

John  Lautner  (resumed) 800 

Oakley  C.  Johnson  (resumed) 800 

Elias  Carmen 810 

Paul  Winter 817 

Sterling  Hunkins 820 

Arnold  Arnstein 822 

Albert  Edward  Walters  (Tiny) 824 

•  Released  by  the  committee  June  11,  1957,  and  ordered  to  be  printed. 

nx 


IV  CONTENTS 

April  12,  1957:  Testimony  of —  Page 

Benny  Berrafato 831 

Seymour  Levittan 833 

Max  Goberman 840 

June  Rotenberg 850 

Simeon  Jurist 854 

Arthur  Deutsch 861 

Theodore  Saidenberg 863 

Gita  Rosova 866 

John  Imbergamo 867 

Index I 


Public  Law  601,  79th  Congress 

The  legislation  under  which  the  House  Committee  on  Un-American 
Activities  operates  is  Public  Law  601,  79th  Congress  [1946],  chapter 
753,  2d  session,  which  provides : 

Be  it  enacted  ly  the  Senate  and  House  of  Representatives  of  the  United  States 
of  America  in  Congress  assembled,  *  *  * 

PART  2— RULES  OF  THE  HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 

Rule  X 

SEC.    121.    STANDING    COMMITTEES 
♦  **♦*♦• 

17.  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities,  to  consist  of  nine  Members. 

Rule  XI 

POWEES  AND  DUTIES  OF  COMMITTEES 
******* 

(q)    (1)    Committee  on  Un-American  Activities. 

(A)   Un-American  activities. 

(2)  The  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities,  as  a  whole  or  by  subcommit- 
tee, is  authorized  to  make  from  time  to  time  investigations  of  (i)  the  extent, 
character,  and  objects  of  un-American  propaganda  activities  in  the  United 
States,  (ii)  the  diffusion  within  the  United  States  of  subversive  and  un-Ameri- 
can propaganda  that  is  instigated  from  foreign  countries  or  of  a  domestic  origin 
and  attacks  the  principle  of  the  form  of  government  as  guaranteed  by  our  Con- 
stitution, and  (iii)  all  other  questions  in  relation  thereto  that  would  aid  Con- 
gress in  any  necessary  remedial  legislation. 

The  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities  shall  report  to  the  House  (or  to  the 
Clerk  of  the  House  if  the  House  is  not  in  session)  the  results  of  any  such  in- 
vestigation, together  with  such  recommendations  as  it  deems  advisable. 

For  the  purpose  of  any  such  investigation,  the  Committee  on  Un-American 
Activities,  or  any  subcommittee  thereof,  is  authorized  to  sit  and  act  at  such 
times  and  places  within  the  United  States,  whether  or  not  the  House  is  sitting, 
has  recessed,  or  has  adjourned,  to  hold  such  hearings,  to  require  the  attendance 
of  such  witnesses  and  the  production  of  such  books,  papers,  and  documents,  and 
to  take  such  testimony,  as  it  deems  necessary.  Subpenas  may  be  issued  under 
the  signature  of  the  chairman  of  the  committee  or  any  subcommittee,  or  by  any 
member  designated  by  any  such  chairman,  and  may  be  served  by  any  person 
designated  by  any  such  chairman  or  member. 

******* 

Rule  XII 

LEGISLATIVE  OVEBSIQHT  BY  STANDING  COMMITTEES 

Sec.  136.  To  assist  the  Congress  in  appraising  the  administration  of  the  laws 
and  in  developing  such  amendments  or  related  legislation  as  it  may  deem  neces- 
sary, each  standing  committee  of  the  Senate  and  the  House  of  Representatives 
shall  exercise  continuous  watchfulness  of  the  execution  by  the  administrative 
agencies  concerned  of  any  laws,  the  subject  matter  of  which  is  within  the  juris- 
diction of  such  committee ;  and,  for  that  purpose,  shall  study  all  pertinent  re- 
ports and  data  submitted  to  the  Congress  by  the  agencies  in  the  executive  branch 
of  the  Government. 

T 


RULES  ADOPTED  BY  THE    85TH  CONGRESS 
House  Resolution  5,  January  3, 1957 

*  1^  :tt  *  *  «  * 

RuleX 
standing  committees 

1.  There  shall  be  elected  by  the  House,  at  the  commencement  of  each  Cougi-ess, 

*  *  *  *  *  *  * 

(q)   Committee  on  Un-American  Activities,  to  consist  of  nine  Members. 

*  4<  4:  *  *  4:  4; 

Rule  XI 

POWEES  AND  DUTIES  OF  COMMITTEES 

*  :):  4:  *  *  >l<  * 

17.  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities. 

( a )  Un-American  activities. 

(b)  The  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities,  as  a  vv^hole  or  by  subcommittee, 
is  autliorized  to  malie  from  time  to  time  investigations  of  (1)  tlie  extent, 
character,  and  objects  of  un-American  propaganda  activities  in  the  United  States, 
(2)  the  diffusion  within  the  United  States  of  subversive  and  im- American  propa- 
ganda that  is  instigated  from  foreign  countries  or  of  a  domestic  origin  and 
attacks  the  principle  of  the  form  of  government  as  guaranteed  by  our  Constitu- 
tion, and  (3)  all  other  questions  in  relation  thereto  that  would  aid  Congi'ess  in 
any  necessary  remedial  legislation. 

The  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities  shall  report  to  the  House  (or  to 
the  Clerk  of  the  House  if  the  House  is  not  in  session)  the  results  of  any  such 
investigation,  together  with  such  recommendations  as  it  deems  advisable. 

For  the  purpose  of  any  such  investigation,  the  Committee  on  Un-American 
Activities,  or  any  subcommittee  thereof,  is  authorized  to  sit  and  act  at  such 
times  and  places  within  the  United  States,  whether  or  not  the  House  is  sitting, 
has  recessed,  or  has  adjourned,  to  hold  such  hearings,  to  require  the  attendance 
of  such  witnesses  and  the  production  of  such  books,  papers,  and  documents,  and 
to  take  such  testimony,  as  it  deems  necessary.  Subpenas  may  be  issued  under  the 
signature  of  the  chairman  of  the  committee  or  any  subcommittee,  or  by  any 
member  designated  by  any  such  chairman,  and  may  be  served  by  any  person 
designated  by  any  such  chairman  or  member. 

******* 

26.  To  assist  the  House  in  appraising  the  administration  of  the  laws  and  in 
developing  such  amendments  or  related  legislation  as  it  may  deem  necessary, 
each  standing  committee  of  the  House  shall  exercise  continuous  watchfulness  of 
the  execution  by  the  administrative  agencies  concerned  of  any  laws,  the  subject 
matter  of  which  is  within  the  jurisdiction  of  such  committee :  and,  for  that 
purpose,  shall  study  all  pertinent  reports  and  data  submitted  to  the  House  by 
the  agencies  in  the  executive  branch  of  the  Government. 

VI 


SYNOPSIS 

(  rN\rESTIGATION  OF  CoMMUNISM  IN  THE  METROPOLITAN  MuSIC  ScHOOL, 

Inc.,  and  Eelai-ed  Fields — April  9-12, 1957,  Parts  1  and  2) 

Hearings  conducted  by  the  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities 
in  New  York  City  from  April  9  tlirough  12,  1957,  CvStablished  that 
Metropolitan  Music  School,  Inc.,  is  controlled  by  identified  Com- 
nnniists. 

Miss  Lilly  Popper,  the  director  and  founder;  Wallingford  Riegger, 
president  emeritus;  John  Kenneth  Ackley,  the  registrar;  Sidney  Fin- 
kelstein,  Thelma  Pyle,  and  Harry  M.  Smyles,  all  members  of  the  board 
of  directors;  and  Mildred  Hagler,  a  former  secretary,  were  all  identi- 
fied as  members  of  the  Communist  Party  or  invoked  the  fiftli  amend- 
ment when  interrogated  on  the  question  of  party  membership. 

Wallingford  Riegger  was  identified  by  John  Lautner,  not  only  as  a 
Communist  Partv  member  but  as  branch  organizer,  treasurer,  and 
general  functionary  of  the  Communist  Party.  Lucy  Brown,  Max 
Hollander,  Sam  ]\Iorgenstern,  Max  Pollikoff,  Vivian  Rivkin,  and  Earl 
Robinson,  all  sponsors  of  the  school,  invoked  the  fifth  amendment 
wlien  questioned  about  Communist  Party  membership.  Carroll  Hol- 
lister,  another  sponsor,  had  been  identified  as  a  party  member  in  a 
prior  hearing. 

Twenty-four  identified  Commimists  have  been  on  the  faculty  of  the 
school.  (Lilly  Popper  admitted  that  she  makes  recommendations  to 
the  board  of  directors  in  selecting  faculty  members.)  Some  of  the 
instructors  have  also  taught  at  the  Jelferson  School  of  Social  Science, 
a  Communist  school.  One  of  them  is  Sidney  Finkelstein,  cultural 
spokesman  for  the  Commmiist  Party,  who  described  one  of  his  courses 
at  the  Jefferson  School  in  the  school  catalog  as  "the  role  of  culture  in 
the  class  struggle  today." 

Such  Communists  as  Paul  Robeson,  Robert  Claiborne,  and  Oakley 
C.  Johnson  were  on  the  Citizens  Committee  when  the  20th  anniversary 
of  the  school  was  commemorated  in  1054;  Robert  Claiborne  was  pub- 
licity director  and  Oakley  C.  Johnson  was  editor  of  the  20th  Anni- 
versary Golden  Almanac. 

The  music  school  has  an  annual  registration  of  between  375  and 
400  children  and  adults. 

That  the  school  does  not  impart  musical  instruction  objectively  is 
evidenced  from  an  article  which  appeared  in  the  Daily  Worker  of 
September  21,  1938,  introduced  into  the  record  as  an  exhibit,  in  which 
Dr.  Joachim  Schumacher,  faculty  member,  announces  the  introduc- 
tion of  a  new  course  as  a  study  of  "the  bourgeois  music  culture  in  the 
period  of  monopoly  capitalism."  When  Lilly  Po))per,  director  of  the 
school,  was  asked  if  tlie  foregoing  accurately  described  the  theme  of 
teacliing  at  the  iletropolitan  Music  Scliool,  she  invoked  the  fifth 
amendment.  An  article  in  People's  Songs,  Februaiy-March  1947 
issue,  entitled,  "People's  Songs — First  Year,"  states,  "Among  the  first 


VIII  SYNOPSIS 

year's  most  successful  projects  were  the  classes  in  tlie  use  of  music 
for  political  action,"  referring  to  classes  which  had  been  conducted  in 
schools  in  Washington,  Chicago,  Boston,  New  Haven,  New  York,  and 
Detroit.  In  his  testimony  before  the  committee  Earl  Robinson,  fac- 
ulty member,  stated  that  music  had  been  used  "a  lot"  for  political 
action. 

Further  indication  of  the  Communist  nature  of  the  Metropolitan 
Music  School  is  the  fact  it  frequently  advertises  in  the  Communist 
Daily  Worker. 

An  insight  into  the  school's  operation  was  provided  by  Leonard 
Cherlin,  a  musician  and  teacher.  He  told  the  committee  he  was  a 
Commmiist  Party  member  from  1940  to  1943  and  again  from  1946  to 
1948,  when  he  dropped  out.  Cherlin  was  on  the  faculty  of  the  Metro- 
politan Music  School  from  1946  to  1953.  He  attended  closed  party 
meetings,  he  said,  some  of  them  at  the  homes  of  Lilly  Popper,  the 
director,  and  Thelma  Pyle,  a  member  of  the  board. 

Cherlin's  membership  in  the  party  began  in  1940  when  he  joined 
Local  802,  American  Federation  of  Musicians  and  became  part  of  the 
Communist  Party  unit  within  the  union.  The  Communist  activities, 
he  said,  comprised  "philosophical  discussions  or  educationals,  fund 
raising  campaigns,  and  discussions  on  how  to  facilitate  the  growth  of 
Communist  influence  within  Local  802."  One  of  the  objectives  was 
to  oust  the  anti-Communist  administration  by  a  coalition  between 
Communists  and  non-Communists. 

Cherlin  terminated  his  first  period  of  membership  in  the  party  in 
June  1944  to  enter  the  Armed  Forces.  This  was  a  Communist  Party 
procedure,  he  said.  On  his  discharge  in  1946,  Cherlin  continued,  he 
immediately  rejoined  the  Communist  Party  cell  in  Local  802. 

Cherlin  said  he  utilized  his  GI  benefits  to  complete  4  years  of  musi- 
cal education  at  the  Juilliard  School  of  Music.  Thereafter,  he  received 
a  New  York  State  war  service  scholarship  of  $1,400  which  helped  him 
to  attend  Teachers  College  of  Columbia  University  where  he  received 
his  B.  S.  and  M.  S.  degrees  in  musical  education.  Wliile  in  attendance 
at  Juilliard,  he  was  transferred  from  the  Communist  branch  in  Local 
802  to  another  within  the  cultural  section  of  the  Communist  Party. 

Another  witness.  Max  Marlin,  testified  that  he  joined  the  Communist 
Party  at  the  request  of  one  of  the  officials  of  Local  802  in  order  to  ob- 
tain work.  He  further  testified  that  he  was  pressured  by  the  Commu- 
nist Party  in  1939  and  1940,  after  he  had  become  a  leader  of  orchestras 
playing  in  legitimate  theaters  on  Broadway,  to  hire  Communists. 
When  he  declined  to  do  this,  he  was  tried  by  the  Communist  fraction 
in  Local  802.  It  was  a  rule  that  Communists  were  to  be  taken  care  of 
first,  he  added,  regardless  of  musical  ability.  This  was  one  of  the 
factors  that  caused  Marlin  to  leave  the  Communist  Party.  Marlin, 
a  member  of  the  party  from  1936  until  1940,  identified  a  number  of 
people  as  Communists.    Five  of  them  had  held  office  in  Local  802. 

The  testimony  in  general  established  the  following : 

(1)  Considerable  service  has  been,  and  continues  to  be,  given  to  the 
Communist  cause  by  Communist  artists  and  musicians.  Even  a  hos- 
tile witness.  Earl  Robinson,  composer,  conductor,  and  performing 
artist,  admitted  that  the  use  of  an  artist's  name  and  his  prestige  can 
promote  a  "cause"  and  that  certain  music  is  "revolutionary." 


SYNOPSIS  DC 

(2)  Besides  serving  on  the  Metropolitan  Music  School  faculty,  some 
of  the  members  of  the  faculty  operate  private  studios  where  they 
teach. 

(3)  Some  of  the  hostile  witnesses,  identified  as  Communists,  enjoy 
great  influence  and  prestige  as  composers,  conductors,  contractors, 
and  members  of  world-renowned  symphonic  and  concert  groups. 
Many  work  in  the  most  lucrative  fields  of  music:  television,  radio, 
theater  pits,  and  record  companies.  One  witness  was  chairman  of  the 
board  of  the  Symphony  of  the  Air ;  another  was  a  member  of  its  per- 
sonnel committee;  still  another  engages  musicians  for  orchestras  to 
accompany  productions  and  artists  presented  by  an  internationally 
famous  impresario. 

(4)  The  importance  of  many  of  the  hostile  witnesses  is  further 
evidenced  by  the  fact  that  they  have  performed,  and  their  works  have 
been  performed,  in  some  of  the  most  important  musical  centers  and 
theaters  throughout  the  world,  sometimes  under  the  sponsorship  of 
cultural  agencies  of  the  United  States  Government. 

One  witness  entertained  at  the  "Wliite  House;  another  worked  for 
the  Adjutant  General  of  the  United  States  as  a  translator  for  the 
United  Nations,  first  in  the  Russian  Translation  Section  and  later  for 
its  International  Telecommunications  Union.  He  refused  to  say 
whether  or  not  he  liad  been  a  Communist  or  whether  he  had  been  in 
communication  with  any  Soviet  agent  during  such  employment.  He 
presently  holds  the  position  of  music  librarian  for  an  important  music 
publishing  house. 

(5)  The  danger  the  Communist  musician  and  teacher  presents  is 
summed  up  in  a  letter  addressed  to  Lilly  Popper,  director  of  the  Metro- 
politan Music  School,  in  answer  to  her  appeal  that  the  school  be  sup- 
ported in  the  investigation  and  hearing.  The  writer  of  the  letter  is 
Dr.  Abram  Chasins,  music  director  of  radio  station  WQXR  owned  by 
the  New  York  Times  and  director  of  the  annual  musical  educational 
activities  of  the  New  York  Times. 

Miss  Popper  had  stated  in  her  appeal,  "The  very  idea  that  there  is  an 
'un-American'  way  of  teaching  music  is  ridiculous."  Dr.  Chasins 
answered : 

"I  think  this  is  eminently  correct,  but  there  is  more  to  the  question. 
There  are  those  who  think  that  teaching  involves  only  techniques. 
However,  a  teacher  worthy  of  the  name  exerts  a  powerful  intellectual 
and  spiritual  influence  on  the  pupils.  In  my  opinion,  any  teacher  who 
abuses  this  great  pedagogical  privilege  to  impose  irrelevant  political 
ideas  upon  an  esthetic  relationship,  is  unfit  to  teach,  no  matter  what 
his  nationality  or  ideology." 


INVESTIGATION  OF  COMMUNISM  IN  THE  METROPOLI- 
TAN MUSIC  SCHOOL,  INC.,  AND  RELATED  FIELDS- 
PART  1 

TUESDAY,  APRIL  9,   1957 


United  States  House  of  Representatives, 

Subcommittee  or  the 
Committee  on  Un-American  Activities, 

New  York,  N.  Y. 

PUBLIC  HEARING 

A  subcommittee  of  the  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities  met 
at  10  a.  m.,  pursuant  to  notice,  in  room  35,  United  States  Courthouse, 
Foley  Square,  New  York,  N.  Y.,  Hon.  Morgan  M.  Moulder  (chairman 
of  the  subcommittee),  presiding. 

Committee  members  present :  Representatives  Morgan  M.  Moulder, 
of  Missouri;  Clyde  Doyle,  of  California;  James  B.  Frazier,  Jr.,  of 
Tennessee;  Bernard  W.  Kearney,  of  New  York;  and  Robert  J.  Mc- 
intosh, of  Michigan. 

Staff  members  present:  Richard  Arens,  director;  Dolores  Scotti, 
investigator ;  and  Frank  Bonora,  acting  clerk. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  committee  will  be  in  order. 

This  subcommittee,  consisting  of  Mr.  Mcintosh,  of  Michigan ;  Mr. 
Kearney,  of  New  York ;  Mr.  Clyde  Doyle,  on  my  left,  of  California ; 
Congressman  Frazier,  of  Tennessee ;  and  myself  as  chairman,  is  duly 
appointed  by  the  chairman  of  the  committee,  Francis  E.  Walter,  to 
conduct  the  hearings.  There  being  a  quorum  present,  the  committee 
will  come  to  order. 

(Resolution  and  order  follow:) 

ExcEEPT  From  the  Minutes  of  January  22,  1957 

A  motion  was  made  by  Mr.  Kearney,  seconded  by  Mr.  Willis,  and  unanimously 
carried,  approving  and  authorizing  the  holding  of  hearings  in  New  York  City, 
beginning  April  9,  1957,  or  at  such  later  date  as  the  Chairman  may  determine, 
and  the  conduct  of  investigations  deemed  i-easonably  necessary  by  the  staff 
in  preparation  therefor,  the  subject  of  which  hearings  and  the  investigations  in 
connection  therewith  to  include,  in  general,  all  matters  within  the  jurisdiction 
of  the  committee,  and  in  particular  the  extent,  character,  and  objects  of  Com- 
munist Party  activities  within  the  entertainment  industry. 

To  tfw  Clerk  of  the  Committee  on  Vn-Amferican  Activities  of  the  House  of 
Representatives : 

OBDEE   FOB  APPOINTMENT   OF    SUBCOMMITTEE 

Pursuant  to  the  provisions  of  law  and  the  Rules  of  this  Committee,  I  hereby 
appoint  a  subcommittee  of  the  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities,  House  of 
Representatives,  consisting  of  Hon.  Morgan  M.  Moulder,  Chairman ;  Hon.  Clyde 
Doyle,  Hon.  James  B.  Frazier,  Jr.,  Hon.  Bernard  W.  Kearney,  and  Hon.  Robert 
J.  Mcintosh,  associate  members,  to  hold  hearings  in  New  York  City,  beginning 

611 


612         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

on  April  9,  1957,  on  all  matters  within  the  jurisdiction  of  the  Committee,  and  to 
take  testimony  on  said  day  or  any  succeeding  days,  and  at  such  times  and 
places  as  it  may  deem  necessary,  until  its  work  is  completed. 

The  Clerk  of  the  Committee  is  directed  to  immediately  notify  the  appointees 
of  their  appointment  and  to  file  this  Order  as  an  official  Committee  record  in 
the  order  book  kept  for  that  purpose. 

Given  under  my  hand  this  3d  day  of  April,  1957. 

Francis  E.  Walter, 
Chairman,  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities,  House  of  Representatives. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  chairman  desires  to  make  this  statement  on 
behalf  of  the  subcommittee.  This  morning,  the  Committee  on  Un- 
American  Activities  begins  a  series  of  hearings  on  a  distinctive  area 
of  Communist  activity.  The  principal  subject  of  our  inquiry  is  the 
Metropolitan  Music  School,  Inc.,  located  in  New  York  City,  and  also 
the  music  field  generally.  The  committee  has  already  conducted  some 
hearings  on  Communist  activity  in  the  field  of  education,  in  public 
schools,  and  in  colleges  and  universities.  We  have  also  conducted 
hearings  on  Communist  cultural  affairs. 

The  present  hearings  combine  elements  of  both  of  these  spheres  of 
investigation.  We  are  confronted  with  the  problem  of  Communist 
influence  upon  students ;  and,  at  the  same  time,  we  must  be  concerned 
with  the  possible  efforts  of  these  students  to  carry  out  Communist 
cultural  objectives  in  their  professional  work. 

We  have  had  numerous  examples  of  the  important  services  given 
by  Communist  entertainers  to  Communist  Party  and  Communist- 
front  functions ;  the  tremendous  sums  of  money  which  they  have  con- 
tributed to  the  Communist  Party;  and,  on  still  another  level,  the 
influence  they  have  exerted  as  members  of  the  professional  unions. 
Among  those  who  have  been  subpenaed  to  appear  before  us  here,  are 
musicians  who  have  performed  in  various  places  throughout  the  world 
under  the  sponsorship  of  the  United  States  Government. 

Several  worldwide  tours  in  which  they  have  participated  have,  in 
fact,  been  almost  fully  paid  for  by  the  taxpayers  of  the  United  States. 
Their  Communist  affiliations  have  consequently  become  a  matter  of 
deep  concern  to  the  Congress  of  the  United  States,  and  it  is  clear 
that  ways  must  be  found  to  deprive  Communist-controlled  organiza- 
tions of  the  actual  or  the  implied  support  of  the  American  Government. 

Now,  of  course,  we  are  not  worried  about  communizing  Beethoven 
and  Bach,  and  we  do  not  feel  that  the  performance  of  a  concerto  by 
a  Communist  is  in  itself  subversive.  But  we  do  feel  that  the  presence 
of  the  activities  of  Communists,  of  persons  loyal  to  the  international 
conspiratorial  apparatus  in  the  Soviet  Union,  do  constitute  a  sub- 
versive threat  regardless  of  the  profession  in  which  these  persons  are 
engaged. 

The  Communist  musician.  Communist  lawyer,  the  Communist 
teacher,  all  stand  forth  as  a  danger  to  a  free  society  for  the  one  reason 
alone,  that  they  are  Communists  and  that,  as  Communists,  they  will 
utilize  their  professions  in  whatever  way  possible  to  further  the 
interests  of  the  alien  conspiracy  to  which  they  belong. 

I  would  like  to  remind  the  spectators  present  that  they  are  here  by 
the  permission  of  the  committee.  A  disturbance  of  any  kind  during 
the  testimony,  whether  favorable  or  unfavorable  to  any  witness,  will 
not  be  tolerated.  Anyone  who  violates  this  rule  will  be  ejected  from 
the  hearing  room. 


COMMUNISM  iJsr  Metropolitan  music  school,  inc.      618 

In  addition,  please  observe  the  rules  of  the  Federal  court  which 
prohibit  smoking  in  the  courtroom. 

Every  witness  appearing  before  our  committee  is  entitled  to  have 
counsel  accompany  him.  I  want  to  make  it  clear,  however,  that  coun- 
sel's sole  function  is  to  advise  his  client  as  to  his  rights  and  privileges, 
and  the  rules  of  the  committee  prohibit  counsel  from  making  state- 
ments or  arguing  with  members  of  the  committee.  The  sole  function, 
as  stated,  is  to  advise  and  counsel  with  his  client  on  the  witness  stand. 

Are  you  ready  to  call  your  first  witness,  Mr.  Arens? 

Mr.  Arens.  Yes,  sir. 

Lilly  Popper,  kindly  come  forward.  Kindly  remain  standing 
while  the  chairman  administers  an  oath  to  you. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  which  you 
are  about  to  give  before  this  subcommittee  will  be  the  truth,  tlie  whole 
truth,  and  nothing  but  the  truth,  so  help  you  God? 

Miss  Popper.  I  do. 

TESTIMONY  OF  LILLY  POPPER,  ACCOMPANIED  BY  COUNSEL, 

MILDKED  ROTH 

Mr.  Arens.  Kindly  identify  yourself  by  name,  residence,  and 
occupation. 

Miss  Popper.  My  name  is  Lilly  Popper.  I  am  director  of  the 
Metropolitan  Music  School,  and  I  live  at  18  West  74th  Street. 

Mr.  A_rens.  Kindly  tell  us  whether  you  are  appearing  today  in  re- 
sponse to  a  subpena  which  was  served  upon  you  by  the  House  Com- 
mittee on  Un-American  Activities. 

Miss  Popper.  Correct. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  represented  by  counsel  ? 

Miss  Popper.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Counsel,  kindly  identify  yourself. 

Miss  Roth.  Mildred  Roth,  401  Broadway. 

Mr.  Arens.  Please  tell  us,  where  is  the  Metropolitan  Music  School 
located. 

Miss  Popper.  18  West  T4th  Street,  where  I  live. 

Mr.  Arens.  In  New  York  City  ? 

Miss  Popper.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  the  Metropolitan  Music  School  a  corporation  ? 

]\Iiss  Popper.  It  is. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  how  long  has  it  been  in  existence  as  a  corporation  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Popper.  Since  1947,  I  believe. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  one  of  the  incorporators  of  the  Metropolitan 
Music  School  ? 

Miss  Popper.  I  was. 

Mr.  Arens.  Was  there  a  predecessor  organization  to  the  Metropoli- 
tan Music  School  ? 

Miss  Popper.  Yes ;  there  was ;  the  Downtown  Music  School. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  where  was  it  located  ? 

Miss  Popper.  Ill  West  88th  Street. 

Mr.  Arens.  Has  the  predecessor  organization  become  extinct? 

Miss  Popper.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  there  any  affiliate  organization  to  the  Metropolitan 
Music  School? 


614         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

Miss  PorrKK.  No ;  there  isn't. 

Mr.  Akf.xs.  I  las  the  Xeioliborhood  Music  School  ever  had  an  affiliate 
relationship  with  the  Metropolitan  Music  School? 

Miss  Popper.   Yes;  it  has. 

Mr.  Arens.  Tell  us  when  that  afiiliate  relationship  existed. 

Miss  Popper.  I  don't  remember  exactly  the  date,  but  I  know  that 
it  is  many,  many  years  since  we  have  been  separated. 

Ml-.  .Vkexs.  Does  the  Metroi)olitan  Music  School  own  the  building 
whicli  it  occu|)ies;' 

Miss  Popper.   It  will  own  it  when  all  the  debts  are  paid. 

Mr.  Arexs.  It  has  title  to  the  property;  is  that  correct? 

Miss  Popper.  Correct. 

Mr.  Arexs.  And  it  is  paying-  on  the  building? 

Miss  Popper.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Ak'exs.  Tell  us  just  a  word,  if  you  please,  about  the  number  of 
students  who  ai-e  taught  at  the  Metropolitan  Music  School. 

Miss  Popper.  Between  oTo  and  400  students. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Is  that  an  annual  enrollment,  an  approximate  annual 
enrollment  ^ 

Miss  Popper.  I  would  say  so. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Tell  us,  if  you  please,  the  number  of  faculty  members 
who  are  at  the  Metropolitan  Music  School. 

Miss  Popper.  I  would  say  about  38. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  these  full-time  faculty  members? 

Miss  Popper.  Xo;  they  are  not.  Some  of  them  only  have  1  day, 
some  of  them  only  have  2  hours. 

Mr.  Arexs..  Tell  us,  please,  the  age  groupings  of  tlie  students,  in 
general. 

Miss  Popper.  From  the  preschool  depaitment  through  adults. 

Mr.  Arex'S.  I  beg  your  pardon  ? 

Miss  Popper.  From  the  preschool  department  through  adults. 

Mr.  Arexs.  How  many  do  you  have  in  each  of  the  several  cate- 
gories, generally  speaking? 

Miss  Popper.  I  would  say,  generally  sj)eaking,  between  a  fourth  or 
a  third  adults  and  the  others  children. 

Mr.  Arex^s.  Has  the  annual  enrollment  of  the  Metropolitan  Music 
School  been  approximately  375  to  400,  as  you  estimated,  over  the 
course  of  the  last  many  years,  or  has  that  been  just  a  recent  figure? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Popper.  Yes.  I  wish  to  correct.  The  enrollment  is  ])er  term, 
not  annual. 

Mr.  Arens.  Then  the  aimual  enrollment  would  be — would  it  be 
twice  ? 

Miss  Popper.  No;  it  woiddn't,  because  very  nuiny  of  the  people 
continue  during  the  second  term,  but  they  enroll  anew. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Has  the  enrollment  been  substantially  the  same  numeri- 
cally, over  the  course  of  the  last  several  years  ? 

Miss  Popper.  Yes,  I  think  so. 

Mr.  Arens.  Kindly  tell  us  wdio  is  the  president  emeritus  of  the 
Metropolitan  Music  School. 

Miss  Popper.  The  president  emeritus  is  Dr.  Wallingford  Riegger. 

Mr.  Arens.  Can  you  tell  us  the  name  of  the  registrar  ? 

Miss  Popper.  J.  K.  Ackley. 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         615 

Mr.  Arens.  Can  you  tell  iis  also  the  name  of  the  members  of  the 
board  of  directors?     Perhaps  I  can  refresh  your  recollection. 

Is  John  K.  Ackley  a  member  of  the  board  of  directors? 

Miss  Popper.  He  is. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  Sidney  Finkelstein  a  member  of  the  board  of  di- 
rectors ? 

Miss  Popper.  He  is. 

Mr,  Arens.  Is  liobert 

Miss  Popper.  Yes,  Robert  Claiborne. 

Mr.  Arens.  Robert  Harris  ? 

Miss  Popper.  He  is  no  longer,  because  he  is  not  in  fown. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  Mazie  LaMelle  a  member  of  the  board  of  directors? 

Miss  Popper.  No  longer.  She  has  resigned  because  she  doesn't  live 
in  New  York  any  more. 

Mr.  Arens.  Does  she  have  a  successor  on  tlie  board  of  directors? 

Miss  Popper.  No. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  John  H.  Harmon  a  member  of  tiie  board  of  direc- 
tors? 

Miss  Popper.  Pie  has  just  asked  for  his  resignation. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  he  likewise  currently  occupying  the  post  of  treas- 
urer of  the  institution? 

Miss  Popper.  Well,  as  he  has  just  resigned,  I  imagine  that  he  no 
longer  is,  but  he  has  been. 

Mr.  Arens.  He  has  been  treasurer? 

Miss  Popper.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Arens.  Does  he  have  a  successor  as  treasurer? 

Miss  Popper.  Not  yet.  We  haven't  had  a  board  of  directors'  meet- 
ing since  then. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  Thelma  Pyle  a  member  of  the  board  of  directors? 

Miss  Popper.  She  is. 

Mr.  Arens.  David  Simon  ? 

Miss  Popper.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Harry  M.  Smyles  ? 

Miss  Popper.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Richard  Yaffe? 

Miss  Popper.  Well,  he  is  just  an  honorary  member. 

Mr.  Arens.  How  long  have  you  been  associated,  first,  with  the 
Metropolitan  Music  School  and  then,  secondly,  with  the  predecessor 
organization,  the  Downtown  Music  School  ? 

Miss  Popper.  Since  its  inception. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  when  was  the  Downtown  Music  School  initiated 
or  started? 

Miss  Popper.  1934-35. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  were  witli  the  Downtown  Music  School  all  dur- 
ing its  existence? 

Miss  Popper.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Miss  Popper,  are  you  now,  or  have  you  ever  been,  a 
member  of  the  Communist  Party  ? 

]\Iiss  Popper.  Sir,  I  decline  to  on  the  basis  of  my  rights  under  tlie 
first  amendment  and  my  right  under  the  fifth  amendment  to  be  a  wit- 
ness against  myself.  And  I  object  to  this  question  as  to  my  political 
affiliations  or  nonaffiliations. 

Mr.  Arens.  Now,  in  anticipation  of  the  appearance  by  yourself 
here  today,  did  you  address  a  letter  to  certain  persons  on  the  letterhead 


616         COMMUNISM   IN    METROPOLITAN   MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

of  the  Metropolitan  Music  School,  and  accompany  that  letter  with  a 
memorandum  ? 

Miss  Popper.  I  certainly  did. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  lay  before  you,  if  you  please,  a  letter  bearing  your 
signature,  accompanied  by  a  memorandum.  I  ask  if  you  would  kindly 
be  good  enough  to  tell  us  if  that  is  a  true  and  correct  reproduction 
of  the  letter  and  accompanying  memorandum  which  you  sent  to  each 
of  several  persons  in  anticipation  of  these  hearings  today. 

(Document  handed  to  witness.) 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Popper.  Yes;  this  is  a  copy  of  the  letter.  This  is  a  copy  of 
the  letter, 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  this  exhibit, 
and  all  succeeding  exhibits  used  in  the  course  of  the  hearings  here  in 
this  session,  be  appropriately  marked,  and  reproduced  or  incor- 
porated by  reference  in  the  record.  If  we  have  a  general  order  of 
that  character,  it  will  save  a  little  time,  I  believe. 

Mr,  Moulder,  Without  objection,  it  is  so  ordered.  Do  you  mean 
by  that  every  exhibit  wliich  you  offer  to  a  witness? 

Mr,  Arens.  Yes,  sir;  numbered  in  chronological  order  and  repro- 
duced or  incorporated  by  reference  in  the  record  as  the  case  may  be. 
We  have  a  number  of  exhibits  which  we  shall  use  in  the  course  of 
these  next  several  days.  It  will  just  be  a  mode  of  facilitating  our 
proceedings. 

Mr.  ]\Ioulder,  Without  objection,  it  will  be  so  ordered,  unless,  of 
course,  there  is  objection  on  the  part  of  any  member  of  the  subcom- 
mittee to  any  exhibit  which  you  may  offer  later, 

Mr,  Arens.  Yes,  sir, 

PoppEE  Exhibit  No.  1 

Metropolitan  Music  School,  Inc., 

18  West  74th  Street, 
Neic  York,  N.  Y.,  April  1,  1957. 
Mr.  Abeam  Chasins, 

229  West  43d  Street,  Neiv  York  City. 

Dear  Sponsor:  Nearly  three  years  ago  we  wrote  you  concerning  an  attack  on 
the  school  by  the  publication  Neiv  Counterattack.  Like  all  the  rest  of  our  spon- 
sors you  stood  by  us. 

We  now  face  the  second  phase  of  this  attack.  More  than  fifty  musicians, 
actors  and  writers  have  been  subpoenaed  by  the  House  Committee  on  Un-Ameri- 
can Activities,  among  them  members  of  our  faculty  and  administrative  staff. 
Public  interrogation  of  these  people  will  begin  on  April  9th. 

Judging  from  its  past  activities,  the  Committee's  object  is  the  same  as 
Counterattack's:  to  set  up  a  blacklist  of  persons  whose  present  or  past  political 
beliefs  or  associations  it  finds  distasteful.  Pressure  will  be  brought  on  indi- 
viduals and  organizations  (such  as  the  school)  to  refuse  to  employ  such  people. 

We  do  not  propose  to  give  in  to  such  pressure.  We  know,  as  you  do,  that 
most  American  musicians  have  a  hard  enough  time  making  a  living  without 
being  subjected  to  irrelevant  political  tests.  Moreover,  we  believe  that  no 
reputable  educational  or  musical  organization  can  or  should  permit  a  Congres- 
sional committee — or  any  other  outside  group — to  dictate  whom  it  may  or  may 
not  employ.  In  the  future  as  in  the  past  we  intend  to  employ  teachers  on  the 
basis  of  their  professional  competence  only.  For  this  reason  it  is  quite  likely 
that  our  school  will  be  denounced  as  a  "Communist  front"  organization. 

As  you  know,  there  is  nothing  "subversive"  about  the  school's  activities.  On 
the  contrary :  the  fact  that  we  have  for  years  had  an  "integrated"  faculty  and 
student  body  has  drawn  the  favorable  attention  of  the  U.  S.  Information  Agency 
as  well  as  publications  like  Color.  The  very  idea  that  there  is  an  "un-Ameri- 
can" way  of  teaching  music  is  ridiculous.  The  political  beliefs  of  our  staff — 
into  which  we  have  never  enquired — cannot  conceivably  endanger  the  security 


COMMUNISM    m    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         617 

or  welfare  of  the  United  States.  Under  the  circumstances,  we  can  only  regard 
the  Committee's  activities  as  an  attempt  by  publicity-hxingry  politicians  to 
hamper  the  development  of  American  culture. 

We  are  sure  that  we  will  continue  to  enjoy  your  support.     We  hope  also  that 
you  will  acquaint  the  Committee  with  your  feelings  about  the  school  and  this 
attack  upon  it. 
Sincerely, 

Lilly  Poppek,  Director. 

Popper  Exhibit  No  1a 
Memorandum 

In  the  interest  of  our  staff  members  and  the  other  musicians  who  have  been 
subpoenaed,  we  have,  in  cooperation  with  attorneys  in  the  field,  prepared  the 
following  memorandum  summarizing  some  of  the  problems  faced  by  witnesses 
before  the  Committee.  We  hope  it  will  help  to  provide  "background"  to  the 
current  hearings. 

A  hearing  before  the  Committee  on  UnAmerican  Activities  is  not  a  court  pro- 
ceeding. It  is  subject  to  none  of  the  ordinary  rules  of  evidence :  "cooperative" 
witnesses  are  permitted  and  often  encouraged  to  fill  the  record  with  hearsay, 
rumor  and  personal  conjecture.  "Accused"  persons  are  not  permitted  to  cross- 
examine  witnesses  against  them. 

The  Committee  has  stated  as  a  matter  of  policy  that  it  does  not  call  anyone 
before  it  unless  it  possesses  evidence  that  the  person  was  once  a  member  of 
the  Communist  Party.  Witnesses  questioned  on  this  or  similar  matters  are 
therefore  faced  with  the  following  alternatives  : 

1.  They  may  deny  the  "accusation."  In  this  case  they  may  be  indicted  for 
perjury  on  the  basis  of  the  testimony  about  them  (frequently  secret)  which  the 
Committee  claims  to  have. 

2.  They  may  answer  in  the  affirmative.  They  will  then  be  required  to  "prove" 
that  they  are  no  longer  connected  with  "subversive"  groups  by  naming  all  their 
associates  in  such  groups.  Failure  to  act  as  an  informer  under  these  circum- 
stances is  pimishable  as  contempt  of  Congress. 

3.  They  may  refuse  to  answer  on  the  Constitutional  ground  of  the  Fifth 
Amendment.  Though  it  is  a  well-known  principle  of  American  law  that  this 
amendment  exists  for  protection  of  the  innocent,  the  Committee  has  consistently 
sought  to  turn  it  into  an  inference  of  "guilt."  Persons  refusing  to  answer  on 
this  ground  have  been  abused  as  "Fifth  Amendment  Communists"  and  have 
suffered  loss  of  employment. 

4.  They  may  refuse  to  answer  on  the  ground  that  the  Committee  has  no  power 
under  the  Constitution  to  inquire  into  a  citizen's  beliefs  and  associations.  While 
there  is  good  reason  to  believe  that  this  position  is  legally  sound,  the  Supreme 
Court  has  not  yet  decided  the  question.  Persons  taking  this  alternative  face  the 
burden  of  heavy  legal  expenses  and  the  ultimate  possibility  of  a  jail  sentence 
for  contempt  of  Congress. 

As  you  can  see,  therefore,  every  course  of  action  open  to  a  witness  is  either 
expensive,  dangerous  or  degrading.  It  is  for  this  reason  that  these  and  similar 
proceedings  have  frequently  been  described  as  "inquisitions." 

Mr.  Arens.  Now,  how  many  letters  such  as  the  one  marked 
Popper  Exhibit  No.  1  did  you  send  ? 

Miss  Popper.  I  cannot  tell  you  the  exact  number,  but  we  sent  it  to 
the  sponsors,  and  we  sent  it  with  another  letter  to  the  students  of  the 
school,  to  the  parents  and  the  adult  students, 

Mr.  Arexs.  You  say  here  in  this  letter — and  I  will  not  burden 
the  record  at  the  moment  to  quote  all  of  the  letter,  as  it  will  speak  for 
itself — you  say  in  your  letter  that  the  committee,  namely,  the  House 
Committee  on  Un-American  Activities,  has  as  its  object  to  set  up  a 
blacklist  of  persons  whose  present  or  past  political  beliefs  or  associa- 
tions it  finds  distasteful ;  also,  that  the  object  here  is  to  inquire  into 
political  beliefs  and  irrelevant  political  tests.  Is  that  a  coiTect  inter- 
pretation of  the  theme  of  your  letter  ? 

Miss  Popper.  Yes ;  it  is. 

91198— 57— pt.  1 2 


618         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN   MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  it  your  position  that  a  person  who  is  a  member 
of  the  Communist  conspiracy,  the  Communist  Party,  is  a  person 
who  adheres  merely  to  certain  political  beliefs  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  wnth  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Popper.  I  decline 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Popper.  I  decline  for  the  same  reasons  that  I  declined  before. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  you  sent  a  copy  of  this  letter  to  a  person  by  the 
name  of  Abram  Chasins,  who  is  musical  director  for  WQXR,  which, 
I  understand,  is  owned  or  controlled  by  the  New  York  Times? 

Miss  Popper.  I  did. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  did  you  receive  a  reply  from  Abram  Chasins, 
musical  director  of  WQXR,  a  copy  of  which  I  now  display  to  you? 

(Document  handed  to  witness.) 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Popper.  I  certainly  sent  a  letter  to  him.  Whether  this  is  the 
fact,  I  would  have  to  read  it  through  word  by  word  and  compare  it. 
This  is  his  answer. 

Mr.  Arens.  Yes ;  that  is  what  I  am  asking. 

Miss  Popper.  That  is  what  you  are  asking? 

Mr.  Arens.  Yes. 

Miss  Popper.  I  would  not  be  able  to  tell,  without  reading  it  word 
by  word,  if  it  is ;  but  I  did  receive  a  letter  from  him. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  have  in  my  hand  a  letter  addressed  to 
the  chairman  of  this  committee — which  I  have  received  from  the 
chairman — by  Abram  Chasins,  musical  director  of  WQXR,  director 
of  the  annual  musical  educational  activities  of  the  New  York  Times. 
Dr.  Chasins  also  sent  to  Chairman  Walter  a  copy  of  his  reply  to  Miss 
Popper's  letter  and  memorandum  of  April  1. 

I  w^ould  like  at  tliis  time  to  read  in  toto  the  letter  Mr.  Chasins  sent 
to  the  Chairman  of  the  House  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities 
in  reference  to  the  letter  sent  to  him  by  Miss  Popper. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Proceed. 

Mr.  Doyle.  What  is  the  date  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  April  4, 1957 — 

Popper  Exhibit  No.  2 

The  Chairman, 

House  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities, 
United  States  Court  House,  Foley  Square, 

Neiv  York,  N.  Y. 

Dear  Mr.  Chairman  :  I  have  just  received  a  communication  from  the  Metro- 
politan Music  School  that  iaforms  me  of  a  forthcoming  investigation  of  this 
school  by  your  committee.  Enclosed,  please  find  my  reply  to  the  director  of  that 
school,  which  will  be  self-explanatory. 

For  many  years  I  allowed  this  school  to  use  my  name  as  a  member  of  its 
musical  board.  Originally,  I  consented  because  the  school  had  stated  musical 
objectives  that  appeared  to  be  worthy  of  encouragement.  Two  years  ago  I  wrote 
the  school  requesting  it  to  remove  my  name  from  its  catalog  and  to  accept  my 
resignation  from  its  musical  board.  I  seem  to  recall  that  my  letter  was  acknowl- 
edged with  regret,  but  now  I  understand  that  my  name  was  not  removed  as 
requested. 

My  resignation  was  not  caused  by  political  considerations,  for  I  was  completely 
unaware  of  the  matters  which  your  committee  is  investigating.  I  resigned  from 
several  other  boards  at  the  same  time  because  of  my  decision  not  to  lend  my 
name  to  any  organization  or  school  whose  work  I  could  not  check  personally. 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         619 

The  pressure  of  time  lias  always  made  it  impossible  for  me  to  do  this.  Inci- 
dentally, in  all  the  years  that  I  was  considered  a  member  of  the  Metropolitan 
Music  Board  I  was  never  asked  to  meet  with  that  board.  Nor  have  I  ever  been 
inside  the  school,  to  the  best  of  my  remembrance. 

I  trust  that  it  is  superfluous  for  me  to  add  that  I  am  unequivocally  opposed  to 
every  aspect  of  Communist  ideology.  I  am  writing  you  primarily  because  I  just 
learned  that  my  name  has  continued  to  be  used  in  the  catalog  of  the  Metropolitan 
Music  School. 

Should  your  investigation  expose  those  who  used  the  privileges  of  democracy 
to  undermine  it,  and  should  you  at  the  same  time  protect  all  the  innocently  en- 
tangled people  they  exploited,  every  American  citizen  will  be  deeply  in  your 
debt. 

Yours  faithfully, 

Abram  Chasins, 
Music  Director  of  WQXR,  Director  of  the  Annual  Musical-Educational 
Activities  of  the  Neiv  York  Times. 

Mr.  Arexs,  Mr.  Chasins  enclosed  in  his  letter  to  Chairman  Walter 
a  copy  of  the  letter  ^Yhich  he  addressed  to  the  witness,  Miss  Lilly 
Popper,  director  of  the  Metropolitan  Music  School,  Inc.,  under  date 
of  April  4, 1957,  and  that  letter  reads  as  follows : 

Popper  Exhibit  No.  3 

Dear  Miss  Popper:  Your  letter  and  memorandum  of  Apidl  1  surprised  me  in 
view  of  the  fact  that  over  2  years  ago  I  wrote  to  the  Metropolitan  Music  School 
resigning  from  your  musical  board  and  requesting  the  removal  of  my  name  from 
your  catalog.  I  recall  having  received  a  regretful  reply,  but  your  recent  com- 
munication indicates  that  my  requests  were  obviously  not  fulfilled. 

Nevertheless,  although  not  involved  in  the  matter  that  causes  your  com- 
munication, I  feel  very  much  involved  as  an  educator.  Your  letter  states  that 
"the  very  idea  that  there  is  an  un-American  way  of  teaching  music  is  ridiculous." 
I  think  this  is  eminently  correct,  but  there  is  more  to  the  question. 

There  are  tliose  who  think  that  teaching  involves  only  techniques.  However,  a 
teacher  worthy  of  the  name  exerts  a  powerful  intellectual  and  spiritual  in- 
fluence on  the  pupils.  lu  my  opinion,  any  teacher  who  abuses  this  great  pedagog- 
ical privilege  to  impose  irrelevant  political  ideas  upon  an  esthetic  relationship,  is 
unfit  to  teach,  no  matter  what  his  nationality  or  ideology. 

Although  I  do  not  wish  to  wage  any  political  discussion,  your  communications 
compel  me  to  make  one  thing  very  clear.  I  believe  in  the  necessity  of  congres- 
sional inquiry  on  the  principle  that  intelligent  action  can  only  result  from  thor- 
ough information.  I  know  that  the  process  has  sometimes  been  abused.  I  also 
know  that  it  has  itself  been  the  victim  of  abuse.  Should  anyone  with  the  right 
of  inquiry  ask  me  where  I  have  been,  why,  and  with  whom,  I  shall  be  glad  to 
answer  him.  Should  I  refuse  to  answer,  should  I  use  any  of  the  legal  instruments 
available  to  the  fortunate  citizens  of  a  democracy  to  refuse  to  answer — you  may 
safely  assume  that  I  have  either  stolen  a  payroll  or  another  man's  wife. 

Should  it  develop  that  the  Metropolitan  Music  School  has  knowingly  harbored 
teachers  who  have  abused  both  their  pedagogical  and  democratic  rights,  it  will 
elicit  my  fullest  disapproval. 
Yours  sincerely, 

Abram  Chasins, 
WQXR  Music  Director. 

Mr.  Arens.  Now,  Miss  Popper,  did  you  at  any  time  direct  to  Mr. 
Chasins,  or  cause  to  be  directed  to  him,  an  acceptance  of  his  resigna- 
tion from  the  board  of  the  Metropolitan  Music  School  or  from  the 
list  of  sponsors  of  that  school  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Popper.  First  of  all,  I  have  gone,  since  I  received  that  letter, 
I  have  gone  through  our  material  of  letters  and  answers  which  we 
keep  rather  carefully.  I  have  not  found  any  letter  by  Mr.  Chasins  in 
which  he  asked  far  his  resignation.     By  the  way,  it  is  not  the  board. 


620         COMMUNISM   IN   METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    flSTC. 

He  was  never  a  member  of  the  board.  He  was  a  member  of  the 
sponsoring  conmiittee. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Will  his  name  now  be  removed  as  a  member  of  the 
sponsoring  committee  ? 

Miss  Popper.  Most  certainly. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  Iniow  a  person  by  the  name  of  Marcia  Minor? 

Miss  Popper.  I  didn't  get  that. 

Mr.  Arens.  Marcia  Minor,  M-i-n-o-r. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Popper.  I  don't  know  any  such  name. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  recall  a  teacher  at  the  Metropolitan  Music 
School  by  the  name  of  Dr.  Joachim  Schmnacher  ? 

Miss  Popper.  Yes,  I  do. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  engage  liim  ? 

Miss  Popper.  Well,  the  board  of  directors  did. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  recommend  his  engagement  to  the  board  of 
directors  ? 

Miss  Popper.  That  I  cannot  tell  you.  I  can't  tell  you  how  he  came 
to  the  school. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  lay  before  you  a  photostatic  reproduction  of  the 
Communist  Daily  Worker  of  New  York,  Wednesday,  September  21, 
1938,  page  7,  in  which  an  article  appears  respecting  the  Metropolitan 
Music  School.  It  states  that  Dr.  Schumacher  is  a  new  addition  to  the 
faculty,  and  I  specifically  direct  to  j'our  attention  the  following: 

He  will  introduce  new  courses  under  such  headings  as  "the  bourgeois  music 
culture  in  the  period  of  monopoly  capitalism"  and  "the  topography  of  Carl 
Maria  Von  Weber" — 

and  the  like. 

I  also  invite  your  attention  to  the  latter  part  of  the  article  in  which 
it  is  set  forth  that  "art  for  art's  sake  is  'busted.'  " 

Kindly  look  at  that  article,  please,  and  tell  us  if  the  author  of  that 
article  has  accurately  and  truthfully  described  the  theme  of  teaching 
at  the  Metropolitan  Music  School. 

(Document  handed  to  witness.) 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Mr.  Moulder.  ^Vliile  the  witness  is  examining  that  exhibit,  Mr. 
Arens,  the  name  was  mentioned  of  Marcia  Minor.  Should  that  name 
be  permitted  to  remain  in  the  record  without  further  identification? 

Mr.  Arens.  The  article  speaks  for  itself,  Mr.  Chairman,  in  this 
respect.  Marcia  ISIinor  is  the  author  of  the  article.  It  has  her 
byline. 

Mr.  Moulder.  How  do  you  spell  Marcia? 

Mr.  Arens,  M-a-r-c-i-a,  is  it  not,  Miss  Popper  ? 

Miss  Popper.  I  haven't  found  it  here  and  I  don't  see  it. 

Mr.  Arens.  It  is  under  the  byline. 

Miss  Popper.  First  of  all,  I  don't  Imow  the  person. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  the  spelling  is  M-a-r-c-i-a,  Minor, 
M-i-n-o-r. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Popper.  I  don't  quite  know  what  the  question  is,  sir.  Would 
you  mind  repeating  it  ? 


COMMUNISM    EST    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         621 

Mr.  Arens.  The  question  is  did  Marcia  Minor  in  her  article  in  the 
Communist  Daily  Worker  truthfully  and  accurately  describe  the 
theme  of  teaching  at  the  Metropolitan  Music  School? 

Miss  Popper.  I  decline,  as  I  declined  before,  on  the  basis  of  my 
rights  under  the  fifth  amendment. 

(Document  marked  "Popper  Exhibit  No.  4,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  honestly  feel  that  if  you  truthfully  told  this 
committee  whether  or  not  the  theme  of  teaching  at  the  Metropolitan 
Music  School  is  accurately  and  truthfully  described  by  Marcia  Minor 
in  that  article  in  the  Communist  Daily  Worker,  you  would  be  supply- 
ing information  which  might  be  used  against  you  in  a  criminal  pro- 
ceeding ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Mr.  Moulder.  What  is  your  response  to  that  question  ? 

Miss  Popper.  Well,  I  really  feel  that  in  the  context  of  the  opera- 
tions here,  this  might  be  used  against  me,  and  I  decline  on  the  basis 
of  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  a  person  by  the  name  of  Leonard  Cherlin  ? 

Miss.  Popper,  I  do. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  think  the  record  will  not  show  that 
the  witness  has  answered  that  question  either  yes  or  no.  I  mean  the 
last  question.  I  think  the  record  ought  to  show  whether  or  not  she 
did  answer  that  question  which  you  asked  her. 

Mr.  Arens.  Would  you  have  me  repeat  the  question,  Mr.  Doyle,  and 
then  we  can  be  sure  the  record  is  clear  on  that  ? 

Mr.  DoTLE.  Yes.  Or  we  can  have  the  record  read  to  show  what 
the  answer  is. 

Miss  Popper,  I  have  given  my  answer  and  the  record  will  show  it. 
My  answer  is  the  same. 

Mr.  DoTLE.  May  I  have  the  record  read,  please,  for  that  question 
and  answer  ? 

(The  reporter  read  from  his  notes  as  requested. ) 

Mr.  DoYLE.  Thank  you. 

Mr.  Arens.  The  question  outstanding  was  did  you  know  Leonard 
Cherlin,  and  your  response  was  in  the  affirmative? 

Miss  Popper,  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  When  did  you  last  talk  with  Mr.  Leonard  Cherlin? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Popper.  Well,  do  you  mean  in  person  or  by  telephone? 

Mr.  Arens.  By  telephone. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Popper.  Last  night. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  what  occasioned  the  conversation  ? 

Miss  Popper.  The  occasion  was  that  I  had  been  told  by  another 
instructor  that  Mr.  Cherlin  had  called  him  up  and  told  him  that  he 
also  had  been  subpenaed;  and  I  felt,  after  the  discussion  with  this 
teacher,  that  perhaps  I  could  be  of  some  help,  or  something  or  other, 
because  some  of  the  subpenaed  have  been  speaking  to  one  or  another ; 
and  I  called  up  to  see  whether  I  could  see  him. 

Mr.  Arens.  Had  you  had  a  previous  telephone  conversation  with 
him  in  the  course  of  the  last  several  days  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 


622         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

Miss  Popper.  Well,  he  had  said  that  he  wanted  this  message  to  be 
given  to  me,  that  he  is  subpenaed  and  so  forth,  and  then  I  had  called 
him  up  and  I  told 

Mr.  Arens.  Wliat  is  the  "and  so  forth"  ? 

Miss  Popper.  Pardon? 

Mr.  Arens.  "Wliat  is  the  "and  so  forth"  that  he  said  in  his  message 
to  you  ? 

Miss  Popper.  He  said  that  the  message  was  to  be  given  to  me,  and  I 
don't  remember  anything  else  besides  that. 

Mr.  Arens.  In  the  course  of  your  conversation  with  Mr.  Cherlin 
last  night,  was  the  subject  of  communism  or  membership  by  any  per- 
son in  the  Communist  Party  a  topic  of  the  conversation  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Popper.  "Wliich  conversation  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  The  conversation  you  had  last  evening  on  the  telephone 
with  him. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Popper.  It  was  not. 

Mr.  Arens.  Was  the  subject  of  communism  or  membership  by  any 
person  in  the  Communist  Party  the  subject  of  the  message  which  Mr. 
Cherlin  left  for  you  in  a  preceding  conversation  in  the  course  of  the 
last  several  days  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  w-ith  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Popper.  You  see,  I  did  not  get  the  message.  It  was  one  of  our 
instructors  who  got  the  message. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  he  relayed  it  to  you  ? 

Miss  Popper.  He  relayed  it  to  me. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  Mr^  Cherlin  tell  you  that  he  proposed  to  swear 
before  this  committee  that,  while  he  was  a  member  of  the  Communist 
Party,  he  knew  you  as  a  Communist?  Did  he  tell  you  that,  or  the 
essence  of  that,  in  your  telephone  conversation  ? 

Miss  Popper.  He  did  not. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  been  in  a  closed  Communist  Party  meet- 
ing with  Leonard  Cherlin,  a  meeting  in  which  only  comrades  are 
admissible  ? 

Miss  Popper.  I  decline,  again,  on  the  same  basis,  the  fifth  amend- 
ment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Of  the  members  of  the  board  of  directors  whom  we 
called  off  a  little  while  ago,  how  many  of  them,  to  your  certain  knowl- 
edge, are  persons  who  have  been  members  of  the  Communist  Party? 

Miss  Popper.  Sir,  we  have  gone  through  this  at  the  closed  sessions. 
I  have  been  asked  names  back  and  forth  and  back  and  forth  and  I  de- 
clined, and  I  can  only  see  that  this  question  here  is  given  in  order 
fo  smear  the  school  and  in  order  to  smear  the  people  in  the  school.  I 
decline  to  answer 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  think  it  might  be 

Miss  Popper.  On  the  basis  of  my  rights 

Mr.  Arens.  Consistent  on  the  basis  of  the  motives  that  we  are  try- 
ing to  develop  facts  on  who  are  Communists  in  institutions  of  this 
character  so  that  the  committee  can  recom.mend  legislation  to  protect 
the  internal  security  of  this  country  ?  Do  you  think  it  might  be  con- 
sistent with  our  motives,  for  that  to  be  the  objective? 
(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Popper.  I  still  decline  to 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         623 

Mr.  Moulder.  Let  her  give  the  reasons,  Mr.  Arens.  You  started 
to  give  your  reasons  for  declining  to  answer. 

Miss  Popper.  I  did  give  my  reasons.  I  will  state  my  reasons  again. 
That  I  was  already  asked  at  closed  sessions  name  after  name  and  name 
after  name  and  I  declined ;  and  bringing  this  out  in  the  open  here  and 
asking  in  the  open  can  only  have  one  purpose,  and  that  is  to  smear 
the  instructors  and  to  smear  the  school.  I  will  have  no  part  of  it.  I 
decline  on  the  basis  of  my  rights  under  the  first  amendment  and  my 
rights  under  the  fifth  amendment  not  to  be  a  witiuess  against  myself. 

Mr.  Arexs.  By  the  word  "smear"  I  take  it  you  mean  an  unjust  ac- 
cusation or  an  unjust  innuendo  that  a  particular  person  is,  or  has  been, 
a  member  of  the  Communist  Party.  Is  that  what  you  mean  by  the 
Avord  "smear"? 

Miss  Popper.  My  answer  is  the  same. 

Mr.  Arens.  Just  tell  us  what  you  mean  by  the  word  "smear,"  when 
you  say  that  it  is  the  apparent  attempt  of  this  committee,  or  desire 
of  this  committee,  to  smear  someone. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Popper.  Well,  I  will  say  this :  I  have  seen  again  and  again 

Mr.  Arens.  Just  tell  us  in  this  particular  instance,  what  you  mean 
by  the  word  "smear"  with  reference  to  any  one  of  these  particular 
persons.    Do  you  mean  an  unjust  innuendo  of  Communist  affiliation? 

Miss  Popper.  You  know  as  well  as  I  do  what  has  happened  in  the 
field  of  entertainment,  in  the  field  of  music  and  in  other  fields,  and 
that  has  been  that  people  have  lost  their  jobs,  people  are  afraid  to 
speak,  and  this  I  object  to  very  strenuously  and  I  will  have  no  part 
of  it. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  John  K.  Ackley,  a  member  of  the  board  of  directors, 
a  person,  to  your  certain  knowledge,  who  has  been  a  member  of  the 
Communist  Party? 

Miss  Popper.  I  decline.    That  is  the  same  procedure. 

Mr.  Ar-ens.  Is  Sidney  Finkelstein  a  person  who,  to  your  certain 
knowledge,  has  been  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party,  a  member  of 
the  board  of  directors  ? 

Miss  Popper.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  basis  of  my  rights  under  the 
first  and  fifth  amendments. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  Harry  M.  Smyles  a  person  who  to  }H)ur  certain  knowl- 
edge has  been  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Miss  Popper.  The  answer  is  the  same. 

Mr.  Arens.  Now,  ma'am,  I  should  like  to  invite  your  attention  to 
the  Metro-Tones. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Referring  to  the  persons  named  by  Mr.  Arens ;  do  you 
have  any  knowledge  or  information  as  to  whether  or  not  they  are  now 
members  of  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Miss  Popper.  I  decline  on  the  same  basis. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  want  to  invite  your  attention  to  Metro-Tones,  is- 
sued periodically  by  stafi'  and  parents  of  the  Metropolitan  Music 
School,  Inc.,  18  West  74th  Street,  Xew  York  City,  issued  January 
1957.  I  shall  display  it  to  you  in  just  a  moment.  I  see  by  the  article 
appearing  on  page  2,  under  Coming  Events,  that  a  concert  is  to  be 
given  in  connection,  or  in  conjunction,  with  the  Neighborhood  Music 
School.  I  should  like  to  ask  you :  Does  the  Metropolitan  Music  School 
have  joint  activities  with  the  Neighborhood  Music  School  ? 

Miss  Popper.  Very  few,  indeed. 


624         COMMUNISM    IN   METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

Mr.  Akens.  Did  it  have  one  scheduled  in  April  of  this  year? 
Miss  Popper.  Yes ;  it  did,  but  it  has  not  taken  place. 
Mr.  Arens.  I  observe  on  page  3  of  the  same  publication,  this  ar- 
ticle : 

We  would  like  to  publicize  our  preparatory  department  in  the  public  schools. 
Several  instructors  have  offered  to  visit  Parent-Teachers  meetings  and  give 
illustrative  talks  about  the  work  we  do. 

That  is  a  true  and  correct  article ;  is  it  not  ? 

Miss  Popper.  That  is  a  true  statement ;  yes,  it  is. 

(Document  marked  "Popper  Exhibit  No.  5,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Could  you  tell  us  about  the  number  of  teachers  of  the 
Metropolitan  Music  School  who  do  or  have  visited  parent-teachei-s 
meetings  in  the  vicinity  here  to  give  these  illustrative  talks  about  the 
work  that  the  Metropolitan  Music  School  performs  ? 

Miss  Popper,  Not  one,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  Then  why  was  this  article  in  the  paper  ? 

Miss  Popper.  Because  we  wanted  them  to,  and  they  were  so  over- 
burdened with  work  that  they  couldn't. 

Mr.  Arens.  They  haven't  done  so  yet ;  is  that  correct  ? 

Miss  Popper.  No. 

Mr.  Arens.  The  Metropolitan  Music  School  carries  advertisements, 
does  it  not,  in  the  Communist  Daily  Worker  ? 

Miss  Popper.  It  carries  advertisements  in  all  papers  where  we  can 
get  students, 

Mr.  Arens.  And  does  it  carry  advertisements  in  the  Communist 
Daily  Worker? 

Miss  Popper.  It  does, 

Mr.  Moulder,  Can  you  name  the  other  newspapers  in  which  you 
carry  advertisements  ? 

Miss  Popper,  The  New  York  Post,  the  Times,  Amsterdam  News, 
the  downtown  one — what  is  that  ?  I  don't  remember  what  it  is  called ; 
but  in  8  or  10  papers. 

Mr,  Arens,  Wliat  is  the  name  of  the  printer  or  publisher  who  pub- 
lishes the  bulletins  and  other  printed  material  of  the  Metropolitan 
Music  School  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Popper,  His  name  is  Cohen,  and  I  have  forgotten  the  first 
name, 

Mr,  Arens.  Is  the  name  of  his  company  the  Prompt  Press  ? 

Miss  Popper.  It  is, 

Mr,  Arens,  Do  you  know  that  the  Prompt  Press  was  cited  by  the 
Attorney  General  of  the  United  States  as  early  as  1942  as  that  which 
prints  the  bulk  of  the  literature  issued  by  the  Communist  Party  and 
its  aflSiliates,  and  is  reliably  known  to  be  owned  by  the  Communist 
Party  ?    Are  you  cognizant  of  that  citation  ? 

Miss  Popper,  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  basis  of  my  rights  under 
the  first  and  fifth  amendments. 

Mr.  Arens,  Are  you  cognizant  of  the  Communist  ownership  and 
control  of  the  Prompt  Press  ? 

Miss  Popper,  I  again  decline  for  the  same  reasons, 

Mr,  Arens,  Are  any  of  the  works  of  People's  Songs  used  at  the 
Metropolitan  Music  School  ? 


COMMUNISM    IN   METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         625 

Miss  Popper.  I  wouldn't  know.  You  see,  we  don't  police  the  mate- 
rials used  by  our  teachers. 

Mr.  Moulder.  May  I  ask  what  you  mean  by  People's  Songs,  Mr. 
Arens? 

Mr.  Arens.  People's  Songs  is  an  organization  which  has  been  cited 
which  has  published  Communist  Party  songs. 

Mr.  Doyle.  May  I  ask  this  question :  I  understand,  Witness,  that 
you  just  said  "We  don't  police  the  material,"  but  I  did  not  hear  the 
balance  of  your  answer.  That  referred  to  this  book,  the  People's 
Songs. 

Miss  Popper.  I  said  I  would  not  know  because  I  do  not  go  around 
asking  the  teachers  what  kind  of  materials  they  use. 

Mr.  Doyle.  You  did  say,  "We  don't  police."  Did  the  rest  of  your 
answer  go  to  the  point  of  not  policing  the  material  that  is  used  in 
your  classes? 

Miss  Popper.  No. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Is  that  your  answer  ? 

Miss  Popper.  That  is  my  answer. 

Mr.  Doyle.  In  other  words,  the  board  of  directors  takes  no  respon- 
sibility, and  neither  do  you  as  the  director,  for  wliatever  is  taught 
in  your  classrooms ;  is  that  correct  ?     That  is  your  answer,  is  it  not  ? 

Miss  Popper.  No,  that  is  not  my  answer. 

Mr.  Doyle.  "Wliat  is  your  answer,  then  ? 

Miss  Popper.  My  answer  is  this,  that  the  school  has  outlines  that 
are  carefully  worked  out  and  painstakingly  worked  out  for  each  term 
and  for  what  ground  has  to  be  covered  during  those  terms.  However, 
T  don't  know  which  of  the  books  are  used  or  whicli  books  are  not 
used,  and  I  would  have  no  way  of  knowing  it. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Correct  me  if  I  am  in  error.  Again  I  say  that  neither 
you  nor  your  board  of  directors  takes  responsibility  for  policing  or 
checking  what  books  are  used  in  your  classrooms.  That  is  correct; 
is  it  not? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Popper.  Of  course,  we  take  responsibility  for  what  is  taught, 
because  what  is  taught  is  in  the  outlines  that  we  give  to  the  teachers. 
However,  we  don't  know  every  book  at  every  time  that  is  used. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Of  course  not.  But  when  you  said  that  you  did  not 
police  the  material,  you  were  telling  as,  were  you  not,  that  you  did 
not  check  the  material,  by  way  of  policing,  to  know  whether  or  not 
that  was  the  only  material  that  was  used  in  your  classroom?  In 
other  words,  a  teacher  could  use  material  that  you  had  not  approved 
as  director ;  and  you  would  never  know  it  because  you  did  not  police 
it;  is  that  not  correct?    That  is  what  you  meant  to  tell  us? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Popper.  Look,  we  know  the  basic  material  that  is  used  is  in 
tlie  outlines.  However,  we  don't  know  at  all  whether  this  or  tliat 
material  may  not  be  used. 

Mr.  Doyle.  That  is  riglit.  That  is  what  I  was  getting  at.  You 
would  not  know  what  material  was  used,  for  sure. 

Mr.  Arens.  Does  the  school  have  a  scholarship  arrangement  where- 
by certain  students  are  given  scholarships  ? 

Miss  Popper.  Yes,  it  does. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  who  constitutes  the  board  or  the  committee  that 
makes  the  scholarship  awards? 


626      COMMUNISM  m  metropolitan  music  school,  Esrc. 

Miss  Popper.  There  is  a  scholarship  committee. 

Mr.  Arens.  Tell  us  who  are  on  the  scholarship  committee. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Mr.  Arens.  May  I  ask  you  this  question :  Is  Ray  Lev  on  the  scholar- 
ship committee? 

Miss  Popper.  No. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  Lucy  Brown  on  the  scholarsliip  connnittee? 

Miss  Popper.  No. 

Mr,  Arexs.  Is  Ben  Steinherg  on  tlie  scholarship  committee? 

Miss  Popper.  No. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  Thelma  Pyle  on  tlie  scholarship  committee? 

Miss  Popper.  No. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  there  a  i)erson  by  the  name  of  John  F.  Mehegan  on 
the  faculty? 

Miss  Popper.  Yes,  there  is. 

Mr,  Arens.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  JSIr.  ISIehegan  lias  been  a 
member  of  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Miss  Popper.  I  decline  again  on  the  basis  of  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  Harry  M.  Smyles  on  the  faculty  of  the  Metropolitan 
Music  School? 

Miss  Popper.  Sir,  I  resent — yes,  he  is  on  the  faculty. 

Mr.  Arens,  To  your  certain  knowledge,  is  Harry  Smyles  a  pei'son 
who  has  been  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Miss  Popper.  Sir,  I  resent  this  inquiry  very,  very  nnich,  and  I  again 
decline  on  the  basis  of  the  lifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Carroll  Hoi  lister  is  a  member  of  the  teacliing  faculty? 

Miss  Popper.  He  is  in  a  nonteaching  member,  but  he  is  not  teaching. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  Robert  Claiborne  a  member  of  the  faculty  of  the 
Metropolitan  Music  School  ? 

INIiss  Popper,  He  is, 

Mr.  Arens.  Can  you  tell  us  whether  or  not,  to  your  certain  knowl- 
edge, Robert  Claiborne  has  been  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party? 

Miss  Popper.  The  answer  is  the  same,  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Would  you  repeat  the  answer? 

Miss  Popper.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  basis  of  my  rights  under 
the  first  amendment  and  my  right  under  the  fifth  amendment  not  to  be 
a  witness  against  myself. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  Henry  Zlotnick  a  member  of  the  faculty? 

Miss  Popper.  Yes,  he  is. 

Mr.  Arens,  And  to  your  certain  Imowledge  has  he  been  a  member 
of  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Miss  Popper.  I  decline  for  the  same  reasons. 

(At  this  point,  Mr.  Moulder  left  the  hearing  room.) 

]Mr.  Arens.  In  the  selection  of  the  faculty,  do  you,  as  director  of  the 
Metropolitan  Music  School,  make  recommendations  to  the  board  of 
directors  ? 

Miss  Popper.  Sir,  I  believe  that  in  the  closed  hearing  you  asked  me 
whether  I  had  my  finger  in  the  pie ;  and  I  answered  you  then  at  the 
time  yes,  I  did  have  my  finger  in  the  pie.  However,  what  happens  is 
the  following :  People  write  letters  to  the  school,  give  us  their  back- 
grounds. People  come  in  person  and  consult  with  me.  Then,  on  the 
basis  of  whoever  is  the  best  person  for  that  particular  job,  the  person 
is  engaged  after  consultation  with  the  board  of  directors. 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         627 

Mr.  Arens.  Now,  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  in  the 
presence  of  this  witness,  another  witness  be  sworn. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Call  your  next  witness. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Leonard  Cherlin,  please  come  forward.  Remain 
standing  while  you  are  sworn. 

Mr.  DoTLE.  Do  you  solemnly  swear  to  tell  the  truth,  the  whole 
truth,  and  nothing  but  the  truth,  so  help  you  God  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  I  do. 

TESTIMONY  OF  LEONARD  CHERIIN 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  I  intend  to 
question  Mr.  Cherlin  at  length,  but  I  have  only  1  or  2  preliminary 
questions  at  this  time. 

Mr.  Cherlin,  would  you  kindly  identify  yourself  by  name,  resi- 
dence, and  general  occupation. 

Mr.  Cherlin.  My  name  is  Leonard  Cherlin.  I  live  at  182  East 
59th  Street  in  Brooklyn,  and  I  am  a  musician  and  teacher. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Cherlin,  as  I  said  a  moment  ago,  I  intend  to  inter- 
rogate you  at  length  with  reference  to  a  number  of  items ;  but  at  the 
present  time,  may  I  ask,  have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  the  Commu- 
nist Party  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  I  have. 

Mr.  Arens.  Give  us  at  this  time  the  years  of  your  membership  in 
the  Communist  Part3^ 

Mr.  Cherlin.  From  1940  to  1943  and  again  from  1946  to  approxi- 
mately 1948. 

Mr.  Arens.  During  the  course  of  your  membership  in  the  Commu- 
nist Party,  did  you  know  as  a  Communist  a  person  by  the  name  of 
Lilly  Popper? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  I  did. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  see  in  the  courtroom  today  the  person  whom 
you  knew  as  the  Communist,  Lilly  Popper? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Would  you  kindly  ]>oint  her  out  to  this  committee. 

Mr.  Cherlin.  The  witness. 

Mr.  Arens.  Thank  you.  If  you  would  wait  a  moment,  Mr.  Cher- 
lin, I  expect  to  interrogate  you  further. 

TESTIMONY  OF  LILLY  POPPER— Resumed 

Mr.  Arens.  Miss  Popper,  you  have  heard  the  testimony  of  Mr. 
Cherlin  where  he  has  identified  you  under  oath  as  a  person  known  by 
him  to  be  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party.  Will  you  look  at  him 
and  tell  us,  was  Mr.  Cherlin  lying  or  telling  the  truth  ? 

Miss  Popper.  I  decline  to  answer,  on  the  basis  of  my  rights  under 
the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  will  con- 
clude the  staff  interrogation  of  Miss  Popper;  and  if  there  are  ques- 
tions of  the  committee,  we  will  defer  our  interrogation  of  Mr.  Cherlin 
until  the  committee  has  concluded. 

(At  this  point  Representative  Morgan  M.  jNfoulder  returned  to  the 
liearing  room.) 

Mr.  Doyle.  Are  there  any  questions  from  the  committee  ? 


628         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

If  there  are  no  other  questions,  I  believe  I  have  1  or  2  questions,  Mr. 
Chairman. 

Mr,  Moulder.  Proceed. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Miss  Popper,  in  view  of  your  statement  in  answer  to 
one  of  counsel's  questions,  you  said,  "I  object  to  this  question  as  to  my 
political  affiliations,"  do  you  remember  so  doing  ? 

Miss  Popper.  Yes,  I  do. 

Mr.  Doyle.  In  view  of  that  answer  as  one  of  the  alleged  grounds 
for  your  refusing  to  answer,  I  wish  to  state  that  I  am  sure  the  record 
of  the  highest  courts  of  this  country  shows,  as  well  as  several  declara- 
tions by  the  United  States  Congress  both  House  and  Senate,  that  in 
the  Subversive  Activities  Control  Act,  for  instance,  in  the  81st  Con- 
gress, Congress  made  this  declaration  and  this  is  the  law. 

I  read  this  because  of  your  answer  that  whatever  affiliation  you  had 
with  the  Communist  Party,  if  any,  was  a  political  affiliation.  I  will 
quote : 

As  a  result  of  evidence  adduced  before  various  committees  of  the  Senate  and 
House  of  Representatives,  the  Congress  hereby  finds  that :  There  exists  a  world 
Communist  movement  which,  in  its  origin,  its  development,  and  its  present  prac- 
tice, is  a  worldwide  revolutionary  movement,  whose  purpose  it  is,  by  treachery, 
deceit,  infiltration  into  other  groups  (governmental  and  otherwise),  espionage, 
sabotage,  terrorism,  and  any  other  means  deemed  necessary,  to  establish  a  Com- 
munist totalitarian  dictatorship  in  the  countries  throughout  the  world  through 
the  medium  of  a  worldwide  Communist  organization. 

The  establishment  of  a  totalitarian  dictatorship  in  any  country  results  in  the 
suppression  of  all  opposition  to  the  party  in  power,  a  subordination  of  the  rights 
of  individuals  to  the  state,  the  denial  of  fundamental  rights  and  liberties  which 
are  characteristic  of  a  representative  form  of  government,  such  as  freedom  of 
speech,  of  the  press,  of  assembly,  and  of  religious  worship,  and  results  in  the 
maintenance  of  control  over  the  people  through  fear,  terrorism,  and  brutality. 

The  reason  I  read  that  into  the  record  at  this  point  is  that  this 
committee  is  under  a  direction,  under  Public  Law  601,  under  which 
this  subcommittee  is  here,  fulictioning  under  that  public  law,  and 
that  Congress  does  not  recognize  the  Commmiist  Party,  with  which 
you  have  just  been  identified  as  a  member,  as  a  political  organization 
and  neither  does  our  high  courts. 

We  hold,  with  micontradicted  evidence,  that  it  is  a  conspiracy  to 
set  up  a  totalitarian  regime.  It  is  not  a  political  party  recognized  by 
Congress  nor  by  our  courts.  So  in  my  book,  when  you  claim  that 
it  is  an  interference  with  your  political  affiliation,  I  thought  you  ought 
to  know,  if  you  did  not  already  know — and  I  think  you  already 
knew — that  the  Conunmiist  Party  is  not  a  political  organization  such 
as  the  Democratic  or  Republican  Party.  It  is  a  conspiracy.  That  is 
all,  Mr.  Chairman. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Are  there  any  other  questions  ? 

If  not,  the  witness  is  excused. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Cherlin,  would  you  kindly  take  the  principal 
witness  seat  ? 

TESTIMONY  OF  LEONARD  CHERLIN— Resumed 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Cherlin,  give  us,  if  you  please,  sir,  at  this  time, 
a  brief  thumbnail  sketch  of  your  musical  education. 

Mr,  Cherlin.  I  took  private  music  lessons  first  with  an  uncle  of 
mine ;  and  then,  while  I  was  at  the  Tilden  High  School,  I  won  a  schol- 
arship at  the  Philharmonic  Symphony  Society,  through  which  I 


COMMUNISM   IN   METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         629 

received  music  lessons  under  their  auspices.  Through  this  training, 
I  was  able  to  become  a  professional  musician. 

Mr.  Ajiens.  And  with  what  university  have  you  been  identified  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  I  graduated  Tilden  High  School  in  1936  and  worked 
as  a  free-lance  musician  until  approximately  1940-41,  when  I  was 
able  to  get  several  major  jobs. 

In  1943,  I  went  into  the  service.  I  came  out  of  the  United  States 
Army  in  1948.  I  then  utilized  the  GI  bill  to  go  to  Juilliard  School  of 
Music  for  4  years,  and  received  my  diploma  from  the  Juilliard  School 
of  Music. 

I  then  was  one  of  the  fortunate  people  to  receive  a  New  York  State 
war  service  scholarship  of  $1,400  which  helped  me  go  to  Teachers 
College,  Columbia,  for  the  following  3  years,  wherein  I  received  my 
B.  S.  and  M.  S.  in  music  education. 

That  would  be  in  answer  to  the  music  aspects  of  my  education. 

Mr.  Arens.  Could  you  kindly  tell  us  again  the  circumstances  of 
your  joining  the  Communist  Party  when  you  joined  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  The  circumstances  preceding  my  actual  joining  was 
that  I  functioned  as  a  music  teacher  in  a  Jewish  fraternal  organization 
called  the  Jewish  People's  Fraternal  Organization  [Order]. 

Mr.  Arens.  Was  that  an  adjunct  of  the  International  Workers 
Order? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  That  is  right.  We  would  go  from  1  lodge  or  1  gi^oup 
to  another,  a  group  of  3  or  4  teachers,  where  we  would  give  lessons. 
One  or  two  of  these  people  were  party  people ;  and,  in  traveling  from 
one  place  to  another,  we  would  have  discussions,  political,  theoretical, 
philosophical,  and  practical;  and  pressures  were  put  upon  me  to  join 
the  Commmiist  Party. 

Mr.  Arens.  Wliat  would  be  the  nature  of  those  pressures? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  Philosophical  pressures,  the  practical  aspects  of 
whether  being  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  would  help  facili- 
tate working  toward  a  better  world,  a  better  society;  and  idealistic 
setup  which  would  be  one  where  a  greater  number  of  people  could 
benefit  from  the  material  worth  of  our  country. 

Mr.  Arens.  Now,  kindly  proceed  in  your  own  way  to  tell  us  about 
your  career  in  the  Communist  Party. 

Mr.  Cherlin.  My  answer  finally  was  that  when  I  would  join  Local 
802,  I  would  simultaneously  join  the  Communist  Party. 

Mr.  Arens.  Local  802  is  a  musicians'  local,  is  that  correct? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  Of  the  American  Federation  of  Musicians;  that  is 
right. 

Mr.  Arens.  Proceed,  if  you  please,  sir. 

Mr.  Cherlin.  I  joined  in  1940  and  simultaneously  joined  the  Com- 
munist Party  branch  of  Local  802. 

Mr.  Arens.  Now,  tell  us,  if  you  please,  of  your  career  in  the  Com- 
munist Party. 

Mr.  Cherlin.  The  activities  of  the  Communist  Party,  Local  802, 
revolved  around  having  regular  meetings  at  which  there  would  be 
philosophical  discussions  or  educationals,  fund-raising  campaigns, 
and  discussions  on  how  to  facilitate  the  growth  of  Communist  influ- 
ence within  Local  802. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  how  long  were  you  in  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  At  this  particular  period,  from  1940  to  approxi- 
mately 1943. 


630         COMMUNISM   IN    METROPOLITAN   MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

Mr,  Arens.  And  what  liappened  iii  1943  ? 

Mr.  CuERiJN.  In  1943  I  got  a  job  going  on  the  road.  I  took  a  leave 
of  absence  at  that  time.  AA^ien  I  came  back,  I  had  "greetings"  wait- 
ing for  me  from  Uncle  Sam ;  and  I  terminated  membership  with  the 
Communist  Party  and  entered  the  United  States  Army.  That  was 
Jime  1944. 

Mr.  Aeens.  What  was  your  period  of  service  in  the  United  States 
Army  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  I  served  in  the  United  States  Army  until  1946. 

Mr.  Arens.  After  your  discharge,  did  you  have  any  connection  with 
the  Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  CherlijS'.  When  I  came  back  to  the  city,  my  first  thought  was 
to  reestablish  my  old  contacts,  try  to  find  work,  and  immediately 
rejoined  the  Communist  Party  of  Local  802. 

Mr.  Arens.  How  long  did  you  remain  in  the  Communist  Party? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  Of  Local  802? 

Mr.  Arens.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Cherlin.  For  approximately  a  year  or  less  because  at  that 
time  I  enrolled  in  Juilliard,  started  to  emphasize  the  teaching  aspects 
of  my  profession  rather  than  tlie  playing  aspects,  and  was  trans- 
ferred to  another  Communist  Party  group  which  was  not  primarily 
made  up  of  Local  802  people  or  people  that  were  interested  in  Local 
802  affairs. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  recall  the  name  of  that  new  group  with  which 
you  were  identified  in  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  I  don't  believe  it  had  any  name.  It  was  just  another 
group  within  the  cultural  section  of  the  Communist  Party. 

Mr.  Arens.  How  long  did  you  maintain  j^our  membership  in  the 
Communist  Party  after  you  reaffiliated? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  I  reaffiliated  in  the  middle  of  1946,  and  I  believe 
when  I  left  it  was  early  1948. 

Mr«  Arens.  Wliat  precipitated  your  breaking  from  the  Communist 
Party? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  Two  factors:  One  was  that  the  Communist  Party 
was  taking  an  ultrasectarian  point  of  view  that  I  did  not  agree  with. 
The  so-called  people's  front,  the  popular  front,  period  was  over.  And 
there  was  a  mass  attack  against  everything  that  the  United  States 
was  fighting  for  in  terms  of  rehabilitating  European  countries,  the 
Marshall  plan;  the  factor  of  the  expulsion  of  Earl  Browder,  who 
had  said  that  we  were  in  a  period  of  expanding  capitalism  and  that 
we  should  cooperate  with  the  progressive  capitalists  points  of  this 
country — these  things  disenchanted  me  at  this  particular  point,  plus 
the  subjective  point  that  I  became  intensely  interested  in  my  school- 
ing. 

I  had  to  work  full-time,  go  to  school  full-time.  I  was  married  and 
had  a  child.  I  had  no  time  for  political  activities,  social  activities,  or 
any  kind  of  leisure  activities  and  the  two  synthesized  into  my  just 
going  to  party  meetings  less  and  less  and  eventually  dropping  out. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  been  connected  with  the  Metropolitan 
Music  School  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  Yes.  I  joined — became  a  member  of  the  staff  in 
1946, 1  believe. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  how  long  did  you  maintain  your  connection  with 
the  school? 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         631 

Mr.  Cherlin.  Until  approximately  VJo'd  when  I  took  a  leave  of 
absence.  The  leave  of  absence  was  supposed  to  be  for  1  year.  At  the 
end  of  that  year,  I  received  notification  that  I  would  have  to  renew 
my  leave  of  absence,  which  I  did,  for  another  year.  At  the  end  of 
the  second  year,  I  received  no  notification,  and  I  never  notified  them, 
and  the  whole  thing  was  allowed  to  ride. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Cherlin,  w^hat  is  the  significance  or  importance  of 
the  music  field  to  the  Communist  Party,  and  musicians  to  the  Com- 
munist Party  ? 

Mr.  CiiERLiN.  The  significance  would  be  the  same  of  any  enter- 
tainment field  or  media  which  has  people  in  the  public  eye,  people 
that  have  prestige  and  status  and,  on  the  basis  of  their  prestige  and 
status,  can  influence  other  people. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  is  the  significance  of  the  Metropolitan  Music 
School  in  the  objectives  of  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  This  is  difficult  to  answer  because  in  my  workings 
with  the  Metropolitan  Music  School,  I  never  actually  saw  an  actual 
synthesizing  of  politicalizing  and  teaching  of  music.  These  things 
were  kept  divorced. 

There  was  a  clientele  of  people  that  certainly  ranged  from  the 
extreme  left  to  the  extreme  right.  It  was  considered  that  politics  and 
business  or  music  should  not  mix,  as  far  as  the  Metropolitan  Music 
School  procedures  were  concerned. 

Any  politicalizing,  I  would  surmise,  would  take  place  after  school 
hours,  after  activities  that  the  school  might  have,  where  possibly 
people  woidd  come  together  in  cafeterias  or  social  gatherings  and,  in 
discussion,  any  political  points  that  might  be  had  by  the  teacher  or 
student  would  be  brought  to  the  others  in  the  group. 

Mr.  Arens.  Does  the  teacher  have  a  status  of  prestige  with  the 
students  beyond  the  prestige  of  just  music  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  Depending  upon  the  quality  of  the  teacher  and  of  his 
personality,  I  would  assume  that  there  would  be  varying  degrees  of 
prestige  in  terms  of  teacher-pupil  relationship. 

Mr.  Arens.  In  the  course  of  your  membership  in  the  Communist 
Party,  did  you  know,  as  a  Communist,  a  person  by  the  name  of  James 
Collis? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  I  did. 

Mr.  Arens.  Can  you  tell  us  just  a  word  about  him  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  I  knew  him  during  the  1940-43  period. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  serve  in  a  closed  Communist  Party  meeting 
with  him? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you,  in  the  course  of  your  membership  in  the  Com- 
munist Party,  ever  serve  in  a  closed  Communist  Party  meeting  with  a 
man  by  the  name  of  Arthur  Deutsch  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  I  did. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  know  him  as  a  Communist? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  Yes. 

Mr.  Moulder,  Can  you  give  us  more  specific  identifying  informa- 
tion about  each  one  of  the  parties  he  has  mentioned  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  May  we  start,  then,  with  Mr.  Collis?  Could  you  tell  us 
anything  further  about  Mr.  Collis  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  He  was  f  recjuently  chairman  of  the  meetings  that  were 
held  during  this  period. 


632         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

Mr.  Arens.  Was  he  identified  with  the  Metropolitan  Music  School  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  That  I  don't  know  because  he  wasn't  at  the  Metro- 
politan Music  School  when  I  was  there. 

Mr.  Arens.  Arthur  Deutsch,  kindly  give  us  a  word  of  description 
or  recollection  about  him. 

Mr.  Cherlin.  My  recollection  is  that  he  was  never  an  active  mem- 
ber, but  he  did  attend  meetings  of  Local  802,  party  functions  and 
meetings. 

Mr.  Arens.  These  were  closed  party  fractions  within  Local  802 ;  is 
that  correct  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  know  as  a  Communist,  and  serve  in  closed  Com- 
munist Party  meetings  with,  a  person  by  the  name  of  John  Imber- 
gamo? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Can  you  give  us  a  word  of  description  about  him  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  He  was  not  active  in  any  official  capacity ;  but  several 
times  when  we  had  meetings  in  various  boroughs,  we  would  meet  at  his 
home. 

Mr.  Arens.  Those  were  Communist  Party  closed  meetings;  is  that 
correct  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  reason  I  asked  the  question  was  so  that  those 
people  would  not  be  confused  with  others  who  have  the  same  name.  So 
far  you  have  not  given  any  identifying  information,  such  as  descrip- 
tion or  some  other  fact,  where  they  might  be  separated  from  someone 
else  who  might  have  a  similar  name. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  was  Imbergamo's  home? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  He  lived  in  Brooklyn. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  know  as  a  Communist  a  person  by  the  name 
of  June  Rotenberg? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Give  us,  if  you  please,  a  word  of  identifying  informa- 
tion with  reference  to  her. 

Mr.  Cherlin.  She  attended  meetings  quite  regularly.  As  far  as 
identification,  she  was  a  bass  player,  played  the  bass  fiddle. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  she  was  ever  identified 
with  the  Metropolitan  Music  School  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  Not  during  the  period  I  was  there. 

Mr.  Doyle.  And  were  the  meetings  she  attended  closed  Commu- 
nist Party  meetings? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Gerald  Rudy? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Give  us  a  description  about  Gerald  Rudy,  so  this  record 
is  clear.  Do  you  here  and  now  identify  Gerald  Rudy  as  a  person 
known  by  you  to  have  been  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  Yes.  He  was  at  closed  party  meetings.  He  was  a 
flute  player  and  participated  actively  at  meetings. 

Mr.  Arens.  Sam  Schneider? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  Yes.    He  was  the  person  who  recruited  me. 

Mr.  Arens.  He  recruited  you  into  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  Yes. 

Mr.  Akens.  And  a  word  of  identification? 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         633 

Mr.  Cherlix,  A  clarinetist,  saxophonist,  and  a  music  teacher. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Can  you  give  us  some  description  about  his  age, 
about  where  he  resided,  or  where  he  may  have  worked  ? 

Mr.  CiiERLiiSr.  I  believe  he  now  lives  in  Brooklyn.  So  far  as  age, 
I  would  only  be  guessing.  AVe  are  all  in  our  middle  thirties  or  early 
forties,  I  would  say. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  know  as  a  Communist  a  person  by  the  name 
of  Benny  Berrafato? 

Mr.  CiiERLiiSr.  Yes.    He  attended  Communist  Party  meetings. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Could  you  give  us  a  word  of  description  about  him? 

Mr.  Cherlix.  He  was  a  clarinet  player.  He  was  an  older  man.  I 
would  say  he  would  be  in  the  fifties.    He  was  older  than  the  rest  of  us. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Could  you  tell  us  whether  or  not  you  knew  as  a  Com- 
munist, and  served  in  closed  party  meetings  with,  a  person  by  the 
name  of  Gita  Rosova  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Give  us  a  word  of  description  about  that  person. 

Mr.  Cherlix.  She  was  quite  active  with  the  group. 

Mr.  Arexs.  By  "group-'  do  you  mean  the  Communist  Party? 

Mr.  Cherlix.  The  Communist  Party  group.  What  comes  to  mind 
was  that  she  was  the  only  non-802  member  who  was  a  member  of  this 
802  party  group.  An  older  woman,  I  would  imagine  she  is  in  her 
fifties. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Did  you  know  as  a  Communist,  and  serve  in  closed 
Communist  Party  meetings  with,  a  person  by  the  name  of  Frank 
Schwartz  ? 

Mr.  Cherlix.  Yes. 

]Mr.  Arexs.  Give  us,  if  you  please,  sir,  a  word  of  description  about 
Mr.  Frank  Schwartz. 

Mr.  Cherlix.  He  attended  meetings;  was  not  active,  to  my  recol- 
lection ;  and,  as  far  as  I  know,  plays  bassoon. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Did  you  know  as  a  Communist,  and  serve  in  closed 
Communist  Party  meetings  with,  a  person  by  the  name  of  Jerry 
Schneider  ? 

Mr.  Cherlix.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Could  you  give  us  a  word  of  description  about  Mr. 
Schneider  ? 

Mr.  Cherlix.  He  came  to  meetings;  was  not  active;  and  during 
this  period  he  got  married  and  left,  about  1940  or  1941 ;  and  I  haven't 
seen  him  since. 

Mr.  Arexs.  These  people  concerning  whom  we  have  just  asked  you 
were  all  known  to  a  certainty  by  you  to  have  been  members  of  the 
Communist  Party,  is  that  correct  ? 

Mr.  Cherlix.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Arexs.  And  it  was  during  the  period  of  your  membership  in 
the  Communist  Party  from  about  1940  to  1943,  is  that  correct  ? 

Mr.  Cherlix.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arexs.  I  would  like  to  ask  you  with  reference  to  people  known 
by  you  to  have  been  members  of  the  Communist  Party  in  the  second 
session  of  your  membership  in  the  Communist  Party,  which  you  testi- 
fied about,  namely  from  1946  to  1948. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Before  you  begin,  Mr.  Arens,  we  will  take  a  brief 
recess. 

91198— 57— pt.  1 3 


634         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

(Present  at  the  taking  of  the  recess:  Eepresentatives  Morgan  M. 
Moulder,  Clyde  Doyle,  James  B.  Frazier,  Jr.,  Bernard  W.  Kearney, 
and  Kobert  J.  Mcintosh.) 

(Members  present  after  the  taking  of  the  recess:  Eepresentatives 
Morgan  M.  Moulder,  Clyde  Doyle,  James  B.  Frazier,  Jr.,  Bernard  W. 
Kearney,  and  Eobert  J.  Mcintosh.) 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  subcommittee  will  be  in  order.  Proceed,  Mr. 
Arens. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Cherlin,  before  the  recess,  I  was  in  the  process  of 
lX)sing  to  you  a  question  A\'ith  reference  to  people  known  by  you  to 
have  been  members  of  the  Communist  Party  during  your  second  tenure 
in  the  Communist  Party  from  1946,  I  believe  you  said,  until  1948. 

Mr.  Cherlin.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  have  previously  told  us  about  your  knowledge  of 
Communist  Party  membership  of  Lilly  Popper 

Mr.  Cherlin.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Arens.  Who  has  identified  herself  on  this  record  as  director 
of  the  Metropolitan  Music  School.  Would  you  kindly  hesitate  a 
moment  and  tell  us  the  nature  of  your  knowledge  and  activities  with 
Lilly  Popper? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  I  attended  closed  party  meetings  at  which  she  was 
present. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  where  were  those  closed  party  meetings? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  Generally  in  the  home  of  one  of  the  people. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  know 

Mr.  Doyle,  I  have  a  question  at  that  point.  Counsel. 

Was  that  home,  at  least  when  you  were  there,  known  to  you  to  be 
owned  or  occupied  by  a  person  identified  to  you  as  a  member  of  the 
Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  Yes. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Wliat  was  the  address  of  that  home,  if  you  know  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  It  was  on  Eiverside  Drive,  near  approximately  125th 
Street. 

Mr.  Doyle.  And  about  how  many  people  would  attend  those  closed 
Communist  Party  meetings  at  which  you  and  Miss  Popper  were  both 
personally  present  at  the  same  time  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  These  were  small  group  meetings  of  approximately 
3  to  4  people. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Were  any  people  in  attendance  at  any  of  these  meetings 
of  the  Communist  Party  at  that  home,  which  you  now  describe  as 
closed  Communist  Party  meetings,  known  to  you  not  to  be  Com- 
munists? In  other  words,  were  they  all  known  to  you  to  be  Com- 
munists ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  To  the  best  of  my  knowledge,  they  were  all  Com- 
mimists. 

Mr.  Arens.  Those  were  meetings  to  which  only  known  comrades 
could,  by  the  security  process  of  the  party,  be  admitted ;  is  that  cor- 
rect? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Was  that  a  cell  to  which  you  belonged,  a  Communist 
Party  cell  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  It  was  a  small  group.  It  was  called  a  group  Avithin 
the  club.  I  have  to  make  a  point  here.  During  this  period,  I  was 
quite  inactive  because  of  my  schooling  and  work,  and  I  made  it 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         635 

clear  I  could  not  attend  meetings  regularly.  Meetings  normally 
would  alternate.  There  would  be  a  large  meeting  of  the  entire  club, 
followed  by  a  small  group  meeting  at  someone's  home. 

Mr.  Moulder.  These  were  referred  to  as  discussion  groups  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  Discussion  groups,  educational  groups.  The  meet- 
ings I  would  attend  would  be  the  ones  that  were  held  at  this  particu- 
lar home  because  it  was  convenient  for  me  to  attend.  It  was  only 
1  or  2  blocks  away  from  the  Juilliard  School  of  Music  and  Columbia. 
Other  meetings,  I  just  stayed  away  from  because  I  was  unable  to 
make  the  time  for  these  meetings. 

Mr.  Doyle.  May  I  ask  you  this:  At  any  of  those  meetings  at  a 
home  to  which  you  referred,  did  ]\Iiss  Popper,  whom  you  identified, 
participate  in  the  program  by  way  of  leading  any  discussion  or  read- 
ing any  paper  or  leading  any  discussion  of  the  Communist  Party 
that  you  now  recall  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  I  have  to  make  another  point.  This  was  one  home 
where  I  attended  most  of  the  meetings,  but  there  were  also  meetings 
that  I  can  recall  in  Miss  Popper's  own  apartment.  I  don't  recall  if 
she  attended  any  of  the  meetings  at  the  Riverside  Drive  address. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Did  she  have  closed  Communist  Party  meetings  in  her 
own  home  which  you  attended  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  I  believe  there  were  1  or  2  that  I  remember. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Where  was  that  addi-ess  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  18  West  74th  Street.  She  has  an  apartment  in  the 
school. 

Mr.  Doyle.  How  many  people  would  attend  those  meetings  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  Again,  it  would  be  a  small  group.  I  can^t  recall  for 
sure. 

Mr.  Doyle.  At  any  meeting  that  you  attended  at  Miss  Popper's 
home,  in  the  apartment  at  the  school,  which  you  testified  to,  did  she 
lead  in  any  Communist  Party  discussion? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  Not  that  I  can  recall.  She  was  never  active  in  any  of 
these  capacities  in  the  Communist  Party,  my  assumption  being  that 
her  activities  as  director  of  the  school  were  time  consuming  and,  there- 
fore, there  would  be  no  time  for  lier  to  participate  actively  in  the 
Communist  Party. 

Mr.  Doyle.  But,  to  your  knowledge,  these  meetings  were  held  at 
her  home  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  There  were  1  or  2  that  I  can  recall. 

l\Ir.  Moulder.  You  have  used  that  phrase  several  times  ''active  in 
Ihe  (\)mmunist  Party."  How  do  you  use  it?  "What  does  a  person 
have  to  do  to  b-e  active? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  An  active  person  would  be  one  who  would  accept 
assignments  to  lead  discussions,  read  up  on  pamphlets,  and  then  lead 
the  educationals  on  these  pamphlets ;  a  person  who  would  be  respon- 
sible for  the  collection  of  dues;  a  person  who  would  chair  the  meeting. 
I  sometimes  functioned  in  the  capacity  of  a  literature  agent  where 
I  would  assume  the  responsibility  of  going  down  to  the  Workers  Book 
Store  or  some  other  central  place  and  picking  up  the  literature  and 
bringing  it  to  these  party  meetings.  Inactive  people,  to  my  definition, 
were  those  that  came  to  meetings  and  who  would  listen,  occasionally 
give  their  viewpoints,  but  did  not  accept  actual  assignments  in  terms 
of  preparation  for  discussion  and  educationals. 


636         COMMUNISM    IN   METROPOLITAN   MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

Mr.  DoTLE.  May  I  ask  this  further  question :  Within  what  periods 
of  time  did  you  attend  any  Communist  Party  meetings  at  Miss  Pop- 
per's home  ?     What  years  that  you  can  identify  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  I  would  say  that  would  be  1947. 

Mr.  Arens.  Miss  Popper  this  morning  identified  as  a  member  of  the 
board  of  directors  of  the  Metropolitan  Music  School  a  person  by  the 
name  of  Thelma  Pyle,  whose  name  appears  in  the  bulletin  of  the 
Metropolitan  Music  School.  Did  you,  in  the  course  of  your  member- 
ship in  the  Communist  Party,  know  as  a  Communist  a  person  by 
the  name  of  Thelma  Pyle  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  Yes.  Thelma  Pyle's  home  was  the  one  I  referred 
to  on  Riverside  Drive. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  serve  in  closed  Communist  Party  meetings 
with  her  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Can  you  give  us  a  further  word  of  description  or  char- 
acterization of  Thelma  Pyle? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  I  don't  understand  what  kind  of  description  you 
want. 

Mr.  Arens.  Was  she  a  musician? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  She  was  a  musician.  I  believe  she  was  a  piano 
teacher.  At  that  particular  time,  I  don't  even  know  if  she  was  a  mem- 
ber of  the  Metropolitan  Music  School.  Either  she  did  studio  teach- 
ing or  she  taught  at  some  other  settlement  school.  I  think  that  was 
her  sole  source  of  income. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  know  as  a  Communist  during  your  membership 
in  the  Communist  Party — the  second  tenure — a  person  by  the  name 
of  Mildred  Hagler? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Can  you  tell  us  a  word  about  her? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  She  was  a  person  who  played  cello,  who  taught  cello 
when  there  were  cello  students,  and  also  functioned  in  the  capacity 
of  a  clerk  or  assistant  secretary  in  the  office  of  the  Metropolitan  Music 
School. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  know  as  a  Conmiunist  a  person  by  the  name 
of  Gita  Rosova  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  Yes.  I  have  identified  her  before  with  the  first 
group,  the  802  group.  In  this  particular  period,  she  was  now  active 
outside  of  the  802. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  she  is  a  member  of  the  faculty  of  the  Metropoli- 
tan School,  is  she  not  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  Yes,  and  teaches  violin. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  there  any  other  persons,  whether  or  not  I  have 
asked  you  their  names,  who,  to  a  certainty,  were  known  by  you  to 
have  been  members  of  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  Not  to  a  certainty. 

Mr.  Arens.  There  are  others  whom  you  have  told  us  about  in 
staff  consultations  whom  you  are  not  certain  about,  is  that  correct? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Arens.  We,  therefore,  would  not  like  to  have  you  reveal  their 
names  in  this  public  session. 

Did  you  have  any  experience  in  the  Conmiunist  Party  with  refer- 
ence to  employment  practices  initiated  or  promoted  by   the  Com- 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         637 

munist  Party  for  the  purpose  of  procuring  jobs  for  the  comrades 
or  for  the  purpose  of  precluding  employment  to  anti-Communists  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  There  was  no  overt  showing  of  favoritism  for  Cona- 
munist  Party  people  or  lack  of  favoritism  for  others.  However,  it 
was  assumed  that  people  who  were  of  like  political  feeling  and  be- 
lief would  have  first  choice  if    a  job  opportunity  availed  itself? 

Mr.  Aeens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  will  con- 
clude the  staff  interrogation  of  this  witness. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Mr.  Doyle,  do  you  have  any  questions  ? 

Mr.  DoTLE.  Yes,  I  have  a  question,  Mr.  Chairman. 

I  think  our  committee  counsel  asked  you  as  to  your  music  train- 
ing and  practice  and  so  forth.  I  did  not  hear  you  bring  down  to  date 
what  your  present  activity  was.     Did  you  so  testify  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  No,  I  haven't. 

Mr.  Doyle.  T^'liat  is  your  activity  now  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  Well,  to  continue  with  my  education,  I  left  Teachers 
College,  Columbia,  with  my  masters  in  music  education  in  1953.  At 
that  time,  I  determined  that  I  would  prefer  teaching  younger  chil- 
dren, rather  than  children  of  high-school  age,  and  went  to  New 
York  University  for  one  semester  for  elementary  school  courses,  after 
which  I  became  interested  in  working  with  retarded,  mentally  re- 
tarded, children  and  emotionally  disturbed  children.  I  matriculated 
at  City  College  here  in  New  York  City  for  another  masters  in  psy- 
chological services  in  the  field  of  special  education.  I  am  at  present 
specialist  in  remedial  reading  and  do  tutoring  with  emotionally  dis- 
turbed children  and  children  who  are  retarded  either  academically 
or  intellectually. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Wliat  ages  of  children  do  you  work  with  as  a  specialist 
in  that  field? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  I  have  been  working  with  children  between  the  ages 
of  7  and  13, 1  would  say. 

Mr.  Doyle.  In  your  testimony,  you  used  the  phrase  "philosophical 
basis,"  in  referring  to  one  of  the  factors  that  was  instrumental  in 
getting  you  originally  into  the  Communist  Party  in  1940.  Wliat 
did  you  include  or  mean  by  philosophical  factor  or  basis? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  The  philosophy  of  Marxism-Leninism,  which  was 
that,  on  the  basis  of  the  principles  enunciated  under  that  term,  a  better 
world  could  be  built  for  all  peoples  in  terms  of  a  socioeconomic  system 
which  would  eliminate  classes,  and  have  the  working  class  as  the  one 
and  only  class  in  society. 

Mr.  Doyle.  I  know,  but  wliat  has  the  philosophical  premise  of 
Lenin  and  Marx  to  do  with  our  own  American  economy  ?  IVliat  is  the 
relationship,  if  any  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  The  prsmise  being  that,  as  long  as  we  had  a  capitalist 
society,  there  would  be  alternate  booms  and  busts ;  that  the  working- 
class  people  would  never  get  their  just  due;  that  as  long  as  a  profit 
motive  existed,  the  working-class  people  would  suffer. 

Under  the  principles  of  Marxism-Leninism,  if  the  capitalist  system 
could  be  changed  to  a  Socialist  or  Communist  one,  the  working  class 
could  get  their  full  worth,  their  full  value,  and  booms  and  busts  would 
disappear  in  exchange  for  an  ever  higher  level  of  living. 

Mr.  Doyle.  In  other  words,  the  Communist  Party,  as  you  knew  it  in 
1940  when  you  went  into  it,  was  advocating  the  application  of  Marx 
and  Lenin  to  the  problems  of  the  United  States  of  America  ? 


638         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN   MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

Mr,  Cherlin.  Yes.  But  in  1940  the  problem  was  just  a  little  dif- 
ferent. The  question  ot  socialism  became  secondary  to  the  one  of 
stopping  fascism ;  and  in  those  days,  in  those  yeai-s,  the  primary  prob- 
lem was  that  of  stopping  Hitler.  They  had  developed  a  popular- 
front  or  democratic-front  approach  where  they  were  collaborating 
with  other  elements  within  our  comitry. 

Mr.  Doyle.  As  I  understand  the  emphasis  by  the  Commmiist  Party 
as  applied  to  our  own  beloved  Nation,  it  is  that  they  were  advocating 
then,  and  they  advocate  now,  control  of  our  economy  by  what  they  call 
the  proletariat  or  the  so-called  working  class.  I  think  in  America  we 
are  all  working  people. 

Mr.  Cherlin.  Well,  toward  the  end  of  World  War  II,  when  there 
w^as  a  break  within  the  Communist  Party  between  the  Browderites 
and  those  who  remained  in  control — Browder  was  eliminated,  expelled 
from  the  Communist  Party — the  Communist  Party  then  adopted  a 
position  of  fighting  for  socialism,  and  took  a  direct  frontal  attack 
against  the  socioeconomic  position  of  our  comitry. 

Mr.  Doyle.  AVhat  year  was  that,  do  you  think  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  Toward  tlie  end  of  World  War  II,  1945^6-47. 

Mr.  Doyle.  You  mentioned  Earl  Browder.  He  was  formerly  the 
head  or  general  secretary  of  the  Comnumist  Party  of  the  United 
States. 

Mr.  Cherlin.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Doyle.  I  believe  at  the  convention  of  the  Conmimiist  Party  in 
New  York,  in  1945  or  thereabouts.  Earl  Browder  was  expelled  and 
reduced  to  no  control  in  the  Coimnimist  Party  as  a  result  of  what  we 
know  as  the  Duclos  letter,  is  that  not  true  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  That  is  true. 

Mr.  Doyle.  In  which  the  French  Commmiist  Duclos,  writmg  at  the 
direction  of  Moscow,  delineated  the  fact  that  there  could  not  be  two 
existing  economies  in  the  world  at  tiie  same  time,  that  one  must  survive, 
and  that  that  one  must  he  the  Soviet  system  of  communism.  Is  that 
not  true  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  I  never  read  the  letter.     I  am  assuming  that  is  so. 

Mr.  Doyle.  I  did.  I  have  read  it  often.  Let  me  ask  you  this,  if 
you  know,  and  I  do  know  what  the  fact  is,  and  that  is  why  I  base  this 
({uestion,  to  get  it  before  you  and  tlie  record  and  to  those  who  may  be 
hearing  this  discussion:  This  same  French  Communist  whose  letter 
from  Moscow  deposed  Earl  Browder,  because  Earl  Browder  said  that 
the  American  capitalist  system  and  the  Soviet  system  could  exist  in 
the  same  world  side  by  side  at  the  same  time,  that  French  Communist 
wrote  another  letter  to  the  recent  Communist  Party  convention  held 
right  here  in  the  city  of  New  York  about  0  weeks  ago ;  did  he  not  ?  You 
have  read  of  that  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  I  read  of  that,  yes. 

Mr.  D0Y1.E.  All  right.  And  again  evidencing  the  fact  that  the 
American  Communist  Party  was  looking  to  a  foreign  nation  and  for- 
eign Communists  to  delineate  what  the  American  Communist  Party 
should  do  and  follow ;  again  giving  concrete  evidence  of  a  definite  tie- 
in  between  foreign  Communists  and  the  American  Communist  Party 
right  here  in  the  city  of  New  York  at  their  national  convention. 

I  want  to  just  observe  this,  Mr.  Chairman,  in  connection  with  that 
Commmiist  Party  convention  in  this  city.  You  talk  about  freedom  of 
the  press.     Unless  the  press  reports  themselves  are  inaccurate,  there 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         639 

was  110  freedom  of  the  press  at  that  convention  because  the  American 
press  \yas  not  permitted  to  be  there,  either  to  take  notes  or  photographs 
of  the  proceeding. 

I  have  one  or  two  more  questions.  You  stated  that  when  you  joined 
Ivocal  802  you  would  simultaneously  join  the  Communist  Party.  What 
do  you  mean  by  that  ?  Your  membership  in  802 — did  that  pay  your 
dues  in  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  CiiERLix.  No.  I  said  that  at  the  time  that  I  would  join  Local 
802  I  would  also  join  the  Communist  Party. 

Mr.  Doyle.  But  that  would  be  a  separate  membership  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  It  would  be  a  separate  membership. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Were  you  expected  to  join  the  Communist  Party  if  you 
joined  Local  802,  necessarily? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  Not  necessarily,  no. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Did  you  know  at  that  time  the  condition  of  the  leader- 
ship, of  Local  802?  Were  any  of  them  known  to  you  to  be  members 
of  the  Communist  Party?  If  they  were,  tell  us,  and  if  you  do  not 
know,  say  so. 

^Ir.  Cherlin.  To  the  best  of  my  ability,  none  of  them  were  mem- 
bers of  the  Communist  Party  in  leadership  because  the  Communist 
Party  was  trying  to  organize  a  coalition,  together  with  non-Commu- 
nists, to  run  a  ticket  to  dispose  of  the  people  tlien  in  office. 

Mr.  Doyle.  In  other  words,  the  Communist  Party  cell,  consisting 
of  membership  within  Local  802,  was  trying  to  form  a  coalition  with 
the  non-Communists  to  get  out  of  office  the  officers  of  Local  802  be- 
cause they  were  not  Communists  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  That  is  an  oversimplification,  but  I  could  go  along 
with  that. 

Mr.  Doyle.  All  right.  I  notice  this,  that  you  said  in  1943  you  had  a 
leave  of  absence.     That  was  from  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  Yes.  AMiat  it  amounts  to  was  I  took  a  job  that  meant 
traveling  for  approximately  several  months. 

Mr.  DoYi.E.  You  did  say  that  when  you  joined  the  United  States 
Army,  your  membei'ship  in  the  Communist  Party  terminated. 

Mr.  Cherlin.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Doyle.  ^AHiat  made  it  terminate  when  you  joined  the  United 
States  Army?  I  have  heard  of  Communists  who  did  not  terminate 
their  Communist  Party  membership  when  they  took  on  the  uniform 
of  the  United  States  Army.     A^^ly  did  you  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  The  temiination  was  one  of  ])rocedure.  We  were 
told  that,  going  into  the  United  States  Army,  we  officially  terminated 
our  connection  witli  the  party.  This  was  not  something  of  my  choice 
at  that  particular  time;  but  this  was  tlie  procedure  that  we  were  fol- 
lowing within  the  party,  or  the  party  group  that  I  had  contact  with. 
A  person  going  into  service,  actually  severed  relationship  witii  the 
Communist  Party. 

Mr.  Doyle.  You  stated  that  in  1948,  or  thereabouts,  you  discovered 
that  there  was  what  I  wrote  dowai  here  as  "a  mass  attack  against  every- 
thing the  United  States  Government  was  standing  for."'  I  heard  you 
mention  the  Marshall  ])laii.     What  did  you  refer  to  there? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  Tlie  post-World  A^'ar  II  ])eriod  when  the  question  of 
I'ehabilitation  of  wartorn  Europe  came  to  the  forefront,  and  the  Mar- 
shall plan  came  up  as  a  means  of  helping  these  wartorn  comi tries  to 


640         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN   MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

rehabilitate  themselves,  the  Communist  Party  said  that  this  was  a 
medium  for  undermining  these  countries'  attempts  to  achieve  demo- 
cratic peoples- front  governments;  and  thereby  the  Communist  Party 
took  the  position  of  being  against  the  Marshall  plan  and  any  kind  of 
rehabilitative  efforts  that  we  would  direct  toward  these  wartorn 
countries. 

I  felt  at  this  particular  time  that  the  most  important  thing  was 
helping  these  people,  get  food  and  clothing  and  shelter  to  them,  and 
that  politics  should  be  secondary  to  this  primary  consideration. 

Mr.  Doyle.  jNIr.  Chairman,  I  think  in  connection  with  the  testimony 
of  this  witness,  I  just  want  to  read  a  reference  to  a  statement  by  the 
President  of  the  United  States.  I  read  here  a  brief  in  the  Svipreme 
Court  of  the  United  States,  October  term,  1956,  by  the  American 
Bar  Association.  It  is  an  amicus  curiae  brief  in  the  case  of  Watkins 
versus  the  United  States  of  America,  respondent.  I  read  on  pages  11 
and  12  briefly : 

"No  clearer  or  more  authoritative  declaration  could  haA'e  been  given  than  the 
message  to  the  Joint  Session  of  the  Congress  by  President  Eisenhower  on 
January  5th,  1957,  setting  out  in  detail  the  ever-pi-esent  danger  to  American 
institutions  posed  by  the  Soviet-inspired  Communist  Party.  It  is  false  to  the 
point  of  absurdity  to  dignify  this  conspiratorial  organization  as  a  'political 
party,'  which  its  sympathizers  and  even  some  Courts  are  prone  to  do.  Presi- 
dent Eisenhower  himself  left  no  doubt  as  to  the  con\iction  of  the  United  States 
Government  that  clear  and  present  danger  faces  us  from  the  Communist 
conspiracy. 

"The  President  in  portraying  the  crisis  through  which  America  has  passed 
stated  that  the  world  has  experienced  'instability  which  has  been  heightened 
and  at  times  manipulated  by  International  Communism.'  He  answered  in  this 
January  5,  1957,  message  the  misguided  zealots  who  would  further  temporize 
with  the  Soviet  propagandists  when  he  said  : 

"  'International  Communism,  of  course,  seeks  to  mask  its  purpose  of  domina- 
tion by  expressions  of  good  will  and  by  superficially  attractive  offers  of  political, 
economic,  and  military  aid.'  " 

And  then  I  wish  to  read  just  one  brief  paragraph  from  this  same 
brief,  on  page  8  thereof.  For  the  purpose  of  brevity,  I  will  just  read 
this  statement  quoted  in  the  brief.  It  is  substantiated  by  many  court 
decisions  here  cited : 

"If  Congress  has  the  power  to  inquire  into  the  subject  of  Communism  and 
the  Communist  Party,  it  has  the  power  to  identify  the  individuals  who  believe 
in  Communism  and  those  who  belong  to  the  party." 

At  this  point,  Mr.  Chairman,  I  want  to  read  one  sentence  from 
Public  Law  601,  under  which  this  committee  is  operating  here  today. 
I  read  from  the  congressional  declaration  of  the  powers  and  duties 
of  this  committee.  I  read  subdivisions  (ii)  and  (iii)  of  section  (2) 
on  this  committee's  duties  and  powers : 

the  diffusion  within  the  United  States  of  subversive  and  un-American  propa- 
ganda that  is  instigated  from  foriegn  countries  or  of  a  domestic  origin  and 
attacks  the  principle  of  the  form  of  government  as  guaranteed  by  our  Con- 
stitution, and  all  other  questions  in  relation  thereto  that  would  aid  Congress 
in  any  necessary  remedial  legislation. 

In  closing,  I  wish  to  say  this  to  this  young  man.  I  know,  Mr. 
Chairman,  and  other  members  of  the  committee  will  no  doubt  say 
the  same  thing  or  join  with  me,  tliat  I  recognize  it  has  not  been  an 
easy  thing,  or  a  comfortable  thing,  for  this  man  to  take  the  stand 
here  today  and  identify  these  people  who  were  known  to  him  to  be 
Communists.    I  know  some  people  in  this  room  would  designate  him 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         641 

as  a  stool  pigeon.  Some  of  them  smile  at  tUat,  I  notice.  Well,  in 
my  book,  it  lias  come  to  be  a  showdown  between  the  people  that  rec- 
ognize their  own  Government  as  more  important  than  anything  else 
and  those  who  do  not. 

I  want  to  compliment  this  gentleman  for  taking  a  very  difficult 
position — a  very,  very  difficult  position.  It  is  not  easy,  it  is  not  con- 
venient, it  is  not  comfortable.  I  do  not  know  the  gentleman,  but  I 
know  he  could  not  have  done  it  unless  he  had  come  to  the  point  where 
my  book,  it  has  come  to  be  a  showdown  between  the  people  who  rec- 
he  recognized  the  unrighteousness,  the  danger  to  our  form  of  govern- 
ment and  the  American  people  by  the  international  conspiracy.  I 
want  to  compliment  you,  sir,  on  doing  what  you  have  done. 

You,  Mr.  Chairman,  have  heard  me  say  in  closing  very  often 
that  the  work  of  this  committee  is  not  easy;  it  is  not  comfortable. 
It  is  difficult  for  us  to  have  to  go  into  these  things.  But  our  duty 
as  American  congressmen  is  to  do  it. 

I  have  come  to  feel  that  the  duty  of  any  American  citizen,  knowing 
what  he  knows  about  the  Communist  conspiracy,  its  determination  to 
conquer  this  Nation,  if  it  can,  by  subversive  infiltration  and  by  force, 
is  to  throw  the  Communist  garbage  out  of  his  experience  and  to  come 
forth  and  help  the  security  of  his  Nation  by  doing  what  this  witness 
has  done  this  morning. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Congressman  Kearney,  do  you  have  any  questions? 

Mr.  Kearney.  The  only  question  I  would  like  to  ask  the  witness 
is  this :  Have  you  previously  testified  before  us  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  No  ;  I  haven't.    This  is  the  first  time. 

Mr.  Kearney.  This  is  the  first  time  ? 

Mr.  Cherlin.  Yes. 

Mr.  Kearney.  Then  I  will  forego  the  question  that  I  was  going 
to  ask  3^ou  because  I  was  under  the  impression  that  in  our  last  appear- 
ance here  at  the  Maritime  Building  you  did  testify. 

Mr.  Cherlin.  No. 

]Mr.  Moulder.  Congressman  Frazier. 

Mr.  Frazier.  No  questions. 

]Mr.  Moulder.  Congressman  Mcintosh. 

Mr.  McIntosh.  No  questions. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  witness  is  excused.  I  join  with  Mr.  Doyle  in 
expressing  our  appreciation  for  your  appearance  and  cooperation 
before  this  committee. 

Mr.  Arens.  The  next  witness  is  Mr.  John  K.  Ackley. 

Come  forward  please. 

Mr.  Moulder.  You  will  be  sworn  as  a  witness,  please. 

Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  you  are  about  to  give 
before  this  subcommittee  will  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and  noth- 
ing but  the  truth,  so  help  you  God  ? 

Mr.  Ackley.  I  do. 

TESTIMONY  OF  JOHN  KENNETH  ACKLEY,  ACCOMPANIED  BY 
COUNSEL,  MILDRED  ROTH 

Mr.  Arens.  Kindly  identify  yourself  by  name,  residence,  and 
occupation. 


642         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

Mr.  AcKLEY.  My  name  is  John  Kenneth  Ackley.  I  live  at  No.  31 
West  75th  Street,  New  York  City.  I  am  employed  as  a  registrar  of 
the  Metropolitan  Music  School. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  appearing  today  in  response  to  a  subpena  which 
was  served  upon  you  b}^  the  House  Committee  on  Un-American 
Activities  ? 

Mr.  Ackley.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  you  are  represented  by  counsel? 

Mr.  Ackley.  I  am. 

Mr.  Arens.  Counsel,  will  you  kindly  identify  youi-self? 

Miss  Roth.  Mildred  Roth,  401  Broadway,  New  York  City. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Ackley,  are  you  now,  or  have  you  ever  been,  a  mem- 
ber of  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Ackley.  I  am  not  now  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  the  Commmiist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Ackley.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  basis  of  my  rights  under 
the  fifth  amendment  to  the  Constitution. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  presently,  this  moment,  under  Communist 
Party  discipine? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Ackley.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  basis  of  my  rights  under  the 
fifth  amendment  of  the  Constitution.  In  other  words,  I  do  not  choose 
to  be  a  witness  against  myself. 

Mr.  Kearney.  Just  a  moment.  You  said — and  you  emphasized — 
that  you  are  not  now  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party. 

Mr.  Ackley.  I  did. 

Mr.  Kearney.  If  you  are  not  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  at 
the  present  time,  how  can  you  be  under  Connnunist  discipline  ? 

Mr.  Ackley.  The  same  answer,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  Now  may  I  ask  you  this :  Did  you  resign  technical  mem- 
bership in  the  Communist  Party  so  that  you  could  face  the  world  and 
proclaim  that  you  are  not  presently  a  member  of  the  Commmiist 
Party? 

Mr.  Ackley.  Again,  sir,  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  the 
basis  of  my  rights  under  the  fifth  amendment.  I  do  not  choose  to  be 
a  witness  against  myself. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  honestly  feel,  sir,  that  if  you  gave  a  truthful  an- 
swer, while  you  were  under  oath,  to  that  last  principal  question,  you 
would  be  supplying  information  which  might  be  used  against  you  in 
a  criminal  proceeding? 

Mr.  Ackley.  ]\Iy  answer  is  the  same,  for  the  same  reason. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  this  record 
reflect  an  order  and  direction  to  this  witness  to  answer  the  last  out- 
standing question. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  witness  is  so  directed.  You  are  directed  to  an- 
swer in  the  spirit  of  advice,  not  in  the  spirit  of  threatening  you,  for 
the  purpose  of  warning  you  of  the  possibility  that  you  might  be  en- 
dangering yourself  of  being  in  contempt  of  Congress. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Ackley.  I  honestly  believe  that  any  answer,  other  than  I  have 
given,  to  this  question  could  lead  to  prosecution  and  persecution  by 
this  committee  and  the  other  arms  of  Government  which  it  controls 
or  influences. 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         643 

Mr.  Kearney.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  would  like  to  ask  the  witness  a 
question :  Is  that  your  answer  or  your  attorney's? 

Mr.  AcKLEY.  That  is  my  answer. 

Mr.  Kearney.  That  statement  that  you  have  before  you  that  you 
just  read  was  not  written  by  your  attorney? 

Mr.  Ackley.  I  pulled  that  out  of  my  pocket,  sir. 

Mr.  Kearney.  That  is  all  I  wanted  to  know. 

Mr.  Arens.  Back  in  1941  were  you  employed  in  the  public  school 
system  here  in  New  York  City  ? 
'  Mr.  Ackley.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  for  the  same  reason. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Cliairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  the  witness  now 
l)e  ordered  and  directed  to  answer  that  question. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Without  objection,  the  committee  so  orders  and 
directs  the  witness. 

Mr.  Ackley.  I  decline  to  answer  the  question,  sir,  on  the  basis  of  my 
rights  under  the  fifth  amendment  to  the  Constitution,  and  partic- 
ularly, I  do  not  choose  to  be  a  witness  against  myself. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  honestly  feel  that  if  you  told  this  committee 
truthfully  whether  or  not  back  in  1941  you  were  in  the  public  high 
school  system,  you  would  be  supplying  information  which  might  be 
used  against  you  in  a  criminal  pi'oceeding  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Ackley.  Yes.  I  honestly  feel  and  fear  that  it  might  tend  to 
incriminate  me. 

Mr.  INIouLDER.  Do  you  mean  answering  that  question  itself  might 
tend  to  incriminate  you,  or  that  it  might  open  up  the  door  leading  to 
other  questions  which  might  tend  to  incriminate  you  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Moulder.  If  it  removes  the  veil,  you  thereby  would  be  waiving 
your  right  to  claim  the  privilege.  Therefore,  you  refuse  to  answer 
because  it  might  tend  to  lead  to  other  questions  which  might  tend  to 
incriminate  you  ? 

Mr.  Ackley.  It  might  be  a  link  or  it  might  open  the  door,  as  you 
say,  and  would  be  a  question  that  would  tend  to  incriminate  me. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  lay  before  you  a  thermofax  reproduction  of  the  New 
York  World  Telegram  of  Saturday,  June  7,  1941,  and  a  photostatic 
reiH'oduction  of  the  Commiuiist  Daily  Worker  of  April  24,  1941,  with 
reference  to  your  suspension  from  the  New  York  school  system. 

Kindly  look  at  those  articles  and  tell  us  whether  or  not  the  facts 
recited  there  with  reference  to  your  suspension  are  true  and  correct? 

(The  documents  were  handed  to  the  witness.) 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr,  Ackley.  Sir,  I  decline  to  answer  the  question  on  the  basis  of  my 
right  under  the  fifth  amendment.  I  do  not  choose  to  be  a  witness 
against  myself. 

(Docuinents  marked  "Ackley  Exhibit  No.  1,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  How  long  have  you  been  registrar  of  the  Metropolitan 
Music  School  ? 

Mr.  Ackley.  I  have  been  registrar  of  the  Metropolitan  Music 
School  since  August  1946. 

Mr.  Arens.  Kindly  tell  us,  if  you  i^lease,  the  statistics  with  refereiice 
to  the  enrollment,  let  us  say,  in  the  aggregate  over  the  course  of  the 
last  10  yeai*s  in  the  Metropolitan  Music  School. 


644       COMMUNISM  m  metropolitan  music  school,  inc. 

Mr.  AcKLEY.  I  have  never  taken  that  sort  of  statistic.  Our  enroll- 
ment statistics  are  taken  each  semester,  the  fall  and  spring  of  each 
year.  They  are  used  by  us  only  for  guidance  purposes,  budget,  and 
so  forth;  and  I  have  never  taken  into  account  duplications  from  term 
to  term  or  year  to  year. 

Mr.  Arens.  Duplications  in  the  same  person  ? 

Mr.  AcKLEY.  In  the  same  person. 

Mr.  Arens.  Miss  Popper  testified,  if  I  am  not  mistaken  in  my  recol- 
lection, that  the  enrollment  was  somewhere  between  375  and  400  per 
semester.     Is  that  substantially  correct? 

Mr.  AcKLEY.  That  is  the  average ;  yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Has  the  enrollment  in  each  semester  over  the  course  of 
the  last  10  years  been  substantially  the  same? 

Mr.  AcKLEY.  There  has  been  a  variation  within  50.  It  has  reached 
a  little  over  400  a  couple  of  times  during  the  last  10-year  period. 

Mr.  Arens.  WHiat  has  been  the  minimmn  ? 

Mr.  AcKLEY.  I  don't  recall,  but  it  has  been  in  the  neighborhood  of 
375. 

Mr.  Arens.  Tell  us,  if  you  please,  in  general  appraisal,  the  age 
groups  within  the  school.  About  how  many  do  you  have  m  the  school 
in  each  of  the  various  age  groups  ? 

Mr.  AcKi^EY.  Not  having  any  statistics  in  front  of  me,  it  is  a  diflBicult 
question  to  answer.  We  have  children  beginning  at  the  preschool 
ages  and 

Mr.  Arens.  And  about  how  many  in  that  category  ? 

Mr.  Ackley.  Probably  15  or  20  a  semester. 

Mr.  Arens.  Now,  proceed,  if  you  will,  and  give  us  comparable  in- 
formation on  eacli  of  the  other  age  groups. 

Mr.  Ackley.  Then  we  have  preparatory  departments  where  more 
specific  training  is  given.  Please  understand,  I  am  not  a  musician. 
I  am  a  technical  employee  of  the  school.  There  are  preparatory 
courses  in  the  woodwind  instrument  recorder,  in  piano,  and  in  what 
we  call  exploration  in  instruments  where  the  children  learn  the  differ- 
ence, for  instance,  between  a  bassoon  and  a  cello.  Those  classes  are 
largely  for  6-year-olds  and  7-year-olds,  before  they  have  reached  the 
readiness,  age. 

Mr.  Ajiens.  "VVliat  is  the  number  that  are  in  that  category  ? 

Mr.  Ackley.  Twenty  to  thirty  a  semester. 

Mr.  Arens.  Give  us  comparable  information  on  the  next  age  group- 
ing, please,  sir. 

Mr.  Ackley.  The  next  age  group — I  don't  know.  That  probably 
runs  into  a  hundred  or  so. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  is  the  age  limit  there,  the  minimum  and  the 
maximum  ? 

Mr.  Ackley.  There  really  is  none. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  we  now  in  the  adult  group  ? 

Mr.  Ackley.  No.     We  are  now  in  the  field  of  instrumental  study. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  there  would  be  about  100  in  that  category,  do 
you  say  ? 

Mr.  Ackley.  At  least  a  hundred. 

Mr.  Arens.  From  there  on,  you  do  not  have  age  groupings ;  is  that 
correct  ?  , 

Mr.  Ackley.  That  is  right. 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         645 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  teachers  of  the  Metropolitan  Music  School  teach 
in  the  Neighborhood  Music  School  and  do  teachers  in  the  Neighbor- 
hood Music  School  teach  in  the  Metropolitan  Music  School  ?  In  other 
words,  is  there  an  interchange  of  faculty  between  the  two  institutions  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  AcKLEY.  There  is  no  interchange,  but  I  believe  that  some 
teachers  teach  in  both  institutions. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  where  is  the  Neighborhood  Music  School  located, 
please  sir  ? 

Mr.  AcKLET.  I  should  know  the  address.  It  has  escaped  me.  It  is 
in  the  Bronx. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  did  the  Neighborhood  Music  School  at  one  time 
have  a  legal  connection  with  the  Metropolitan  Music  School? 

Mr.  AcKLEY.  Not  that  I  know  of. 

Mr.  Arens.  Was  it  at  one  time  a  branch,  a  subsidiary,  of  the  Metro- 
politan Music  School  ? 

Mr.  AcKLEY.  I  first  heard  that  from  you,  sir,  at  the  closed  hearings. 

Mr.  Arens.  Has  Paul  Kobeson  ever,  to  your  knowledge,  been  affi- 
liated with  the  Metropolitan  Music  School  ? 

Mr.  AcKLEY.  To  my  knowledge,  Paul  Kobeson  has  never  been  affili- 
ated with  the  Metropolitan  Music  School. 

Mr.  Arens.  Has  he  ever  entertained  at  the  Metropolitan  Music 
School? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Ackley.  He  has  appeared  in  the  building. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  what  occasioned  his  appearance  there  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Ackley.  Some  years  ago,  there  was  a  function  in  connection 
with  an  observation  of  Negro  History  Week ;  and  Mr.  Robeson,  as  1 
recall,  appeared  at  that  meeting. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is,  or  was,  Paul  Robeson  a  member  of  the  Metropolitan 
Music  School  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Ackley.  He  may  have  been.     I  don't  know. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  lay  before  you  now  for  the  purpose  of  refreshing  your 
recollection  the  20th  Anniversary  Almanac  of  the  Metropolitan  Music 
School,  the  Citizens'  Committee  for  the  Metropolitan  Music  School. 
I  invite  your  attention  specifically  to  page  6,  on  which  the  name  of 
Paul  Robeson  appears  as  one  of  the  members  of  the  Citizens'  Com- 
mittee. 

Would  you  kindly  look  at  that  exhibit  and  see  if  that  refreshes 
your  recollection  ? 

(The  document  was  handed  to  the  witness.) 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  AcitLEY.  My  answer  is  still  the  same,  Mr.  Counsel. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  have  no  recollection  ? 

Mr,  Ackley.  I  have  no  recollection  of  it.  I  read  here  in  print  that 
he  was  an  honorary  chairman. 

Mr.  Arens.  Of  the  Citizens'  Committee? 

Mr.  Ackley.  Well,  my  recollection — in  other  words,  my  recollec- 
tion does  not  coincide  with  that.     I  do  not  recall  that  to  be  the  case. 

(Document  marked  "Ackley  Exhibit  No.  2,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 


646         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you,  in  the  course  of  your  performance  of  official 
duties  as  registrar  of  the  JMetropolitan  Music  School,  taken  direction 
or  orders  from  a  person  known  by  you  to  have  been  a  member  of  the 
Communist  Party  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  AcKLEY.  I  don't  understand  the  question.     What  person  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Any  person,  known  by  you  to  have  been  a  member  of 
the  Communist  Party.  Have  you— I  will  repeat  the  question.  Per- 
haps the  phraseolog-y  may  have  been  a  little  puzzling  to  you.  Have 
you,  in  the  course  of  your  official  duties  as  registrar  of  the  Metropoli- 
tan Music  School,  performed  those  duties  in  compliance  with  direc- 
tions which  you  have  received  from  a  person  or  persons  known  by 
you  to  have  been  members  of  the  Communist  Party  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  AcKLET.  I  decline  to  answer  the  question  on  the  basis  of  my 
rights  under  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Moulder.  To  clarify  that  question  by  Mr.  Arens:  Have  you 
received  directions  or  mstructions  from  a  person,  in  coimection  with 
your  work  in  the  Metropolitan  Music  School,  who  was  a  Communist 
and  who  was  giving  you  such  directions  and  instructions  in  the  capa- 
city of  a  Communist? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  way  the  question  was  given,  I  am.  tidying  to 
(clarify  it  to  you,  as  to  whether  or  not  it  is  being  dominated  or  super- 
vised by  Communist  Party  activity  in  any  way  whatsoever. 

Mr.  AcKLEY.  Quite  frankly,  Mr.  Chairman,  the  question  is  con- 
fusing.    May  I  ask  for  a  repetition  of  the  question? 

Mr.  Arens.  The  question  is  this,  in  its  simplest  form :  You  are  now 
the  registrar  of  the  Metropolitan  Music  School  and  have  been  for 
many  years ;  is  that  correct  ? 

Mr.  AcKLEY.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  you  have  certain  duties  that  you  perform  as 
registrar  ? 

Mr.  AcKLEY.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Now,  in  the  performance  of  those  duties,  have  you 
accepted  directives  or  orders  from  a  person  or  persons  whom  you 
knew  to  be  a  member  of  the  Commmiist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Moulder,  Acting  in  the  capacity  of  a  Connnunist.  I  would 
like  to  add  that  to  the  question. 

(The  witness  conferred  witli  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  AcKLEY.  The  2  questions,  the  one  put  to  me  by  counsel  and  one 
put  to  me  by  you,  Mr.  Chairman,  seem  to  be  2  separate  questions. 
t^Hiose  question  am  I  to  answer  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  want  to  start  over? 

Mr,  Moulder.  You  declined  to  answer  his  question,  claiming  the 
privilege  under  the  Constitution.     Do  you  understand  my  question? 

Mr.  AcKLEY.  Would  you  repeat  it,  please  ? 

Mr.  Moulder.  Have  you  ever  received  instructions  from  persons 
who  are  acting  in  the  capacity  as  a  Communist  when  giving  yiou 
such  instructions  and  supervision  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  comisel.) 

Mr.  AcKLEY.  I  wish  I  had  time  to  go  into  how  the  school  functions; 
but  the  things  that  I  do  in  my  capacity  as  registrar  of  the  school  are 
things  which,  for  the  most  part,  are  routine. 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         647 

Mr.  Moulder.  I  am  trying  to  clarify  and  hel]>  you  to  this  extent. 
I  can  understand  the  question  pi-opounded  hy  counsel.  Some  person 
might  have  given  you  directions  sometimes  who  was  a  Communist,  and 
you  might  not  have  even  known  that  he  was  a  member  of  the  Commu- 
nist Party ;  and  then  someone  would  come  along  and  say  that  you  did 
receive  instructions.  Then,  you  would  claim  the  fifth  amendment 
under  the  Constitution.  But  my  question  is  giving  you  an  opportunity 
(()  give  a  very  direct  answer  to  it. 

Mr.  AcKLEY.  In  the  first  place,  I  don't  need  directives  in  order  to 
fulfill  my  function  to  prepare  statistics  and  enroll  students. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  ]:)reviously  invoked  the  fifth  amendment  with  ref- 
erence to  any  prior  membership  in  the  Communist  Party  on  this 
record,  but  did  not  invoke  the  fifth  on  the  question  of  present  member- 
ship. You  invoked  the  fifth  w-ith  reference  to  the  question  of  the 
Communist  Party  discipline.  I  should  now  like  to  ask  you  :  Were  you 
a  member  of  the  Connnunist  Party  5  years  ago  ? 

Mr.  Ackley.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  the  basis  of  my 
rights  under  the  fifth  amendment  to  the  Constitution. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  a  member  of  the  Connnunist  Party  4  years 
ago? 

Mr.  Ackley.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  8  years 
ago? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

(At  this  point  Representative  James  B.  Frazier  left  the  hearing 
room. ) 

Mr.  Ackley.  No. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  been  a  member,  a  technical  member,  of  the 
Communist  Party  any  time  since  the  enactment  of  the  Internal  Se- 
curity Act  in  1950  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Ackley.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  tlie  basis  of  my 
rights  under  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  will  conclude 
the  staif  interrogation  of  this  witness. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Any  questions,  Congressman  Doyle? 

Mr.  Doyle.  No  questions. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Any  questions,  General  Kearney  ? 

Mr.  Kearney.  No  questions. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Congressman  Mcintosh  ? 

Mr.  McIntosii.  No  questions. 

Mr.  Moulder.  That  will  be  all,  Mr.  Ackley. 

Call  your  next  witness. 

Mr.  Arens.  The  next  witness,  if  you  jjlease,  Mr.  Chairman,  will  be 
Mr.  Wallingford  Riegger. 

Mr.  MotjXDer.  Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  you  are 
about  to  give  before  this  committee  will  be  the  ti'uth,  the  w^hole  truth, 
and  nothing  but  the  truth,  so  help  you  God  ? 

Mr.  Riegger.  I  do. 

TESTIMONY  OF  WALLINGFORD  RIEGGER,  ACCOMPANIED  BY 
COUNSEL,  LEONARD  B.  BOUDIN 

Mr.  Arens.  Kindly  identify  yourself  by  name,  residence,  and 
occupation  ? 


648         COMMUNISM    EST    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

Mr.  RiEGGER.  My  name  is  Wallingford  Riegger,  and  I  reside  at 
506  West  113th  Street,  N"ew  York  City. 

Mr.  Arens,  And  your  occupation,  please,  sir  ? 

Mr.  Riegger.  Composer. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  appearing  today  in  response  to  a  subpena 
which  was  served  upon  you  by  the  House  Committee  on  Un-American 
Activities  ?    Are  you  appearing  today 

Mr.  Riegger.  Yes,  sir;  correct. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  represented  by  counsel  ? 

Mr.  Riegger.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Counsel  will  you  kindly  identify  yourself? 

Mr.  BouDiN.  Leonard  B.  Boudin,  25  Broad  Street,  New  York  4, 
N.  Y. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Riegger,  are  you  president  emeritus  of  the  Metro- 
politan Music  School  ? 

Mr.  Riegger.  I  am.  But  now,  if  I  may  be  permitted,  Mr.  Chairman, 
I  should  like  to  know  the  reason  for  this  hearing. 

Mr.  Kearney.  I  think,  Mr.  Chairman,  if  the  witness  will  answer 
the  questions,  he  will  soon  find  out. 

(At  this  point  Representative  James  B.  Frazier  entered  the  hearing 
room.) 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  witness  is,  I  am  sure,  fully  informed  as  to  the 
purposes  of  the  hearing. 

Mr.  Riegger.  Pardon  me.     I  came  late.     I  am  sorry. 

Mr.  Arens.  Perhaps  this  question  will  help  us,  Mr.  Witness:  Are 
you  now,  or  have  you  ever  been,  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  ? 
That  will  give  us  at  least  an  inkling  as  to  what  the  hearing  is  about. 

Mr.  Riegger.  Well,  with  your  permission,  Mr.  Chairman,  I  should 
like  to  state  briefly  my  objections  to  the  procedures  of  this  committee, 
to  its  assumption,  and  to  its  assumption  of  authority. 

Mr.  Kearney.  I  would  suggest,  Mr.  Chairman,  that  the  witness 
answer  Counsel's  question.    We  are  not  interested  in  a  speech. 

]\fr.  Moulder.  Yes.  You  are  directed  to  answer  the  question  pro- 
pounded by  Counsel. 

Mr.  BouDiN.  I  don't  think  it  was  clear  from  the  witness'  statement 
that  he  was  raising  a  question  as  to  jurisdiction  of  the  committee  and 
that  he  wishes  to  read  a  brief  statement  addressed  to  the  jurisdiction 
of  the  committee.  I  would  suggest  that  he  be  permitted  to  do  that. 
This  is  not  an  argument  and  is  not  an  answer.  This  is  a  statement 
which  the  witness  wishes  to  read,  raising  objections  to  the  committee's 
jurisdiction. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Let  us  see  his  statement. 

Mr.  Riegger.  May  I  read  it  first  ? 

Mr.  Moulder.  May  we  first  see  the  statement?  Let  us  examine 
the  statement. 

Mr.  Riegger.  Am  I  not  permitted  to  read  it  ? 

Mr.  Moulder.  We  do  not  know  what  is  in  the  statement. 

Mr.  Riegger.  This  is  a  free  country. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Your  counsel  knows  that  the  rules  require  that  any 
proposed  statement  be  submitted  to  the  committee  before  being  asked 
to  be  read.     We  have  not  had  a  copy  of  that  statement. 

Mr.  Boudin.  Mr.  Moulder,  what  Mr.  Doyle  is  referring  to,  of 
course,  is  a  statement  by  a  witness — not  to  what  the  Supreme  Court  has 
referred  to  as  a  statement  of  objections.     It  is  only  that  that  the  wit- 


COMMUNISM    IN   METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         649 

iiess  wishes.  It  will  take  1  minute,  if  you  will  allow  him  to  make  his 
statement. 

Mr.  Moulder.  It  will  take  only  a  second  for  him  to  hand  it  up 
here. 

Mr.  BouDiN.  I  see  no  reason  why  you  cannot  look  at  it.  Suppose 
you  show  it  to  the  chairman.  And  then  will  you  permit  the  witness 
to  read  it,  Mr.  Chairman  ? 

( The  document  was  handed  to  the  committee. ) 

Mr.  Kearney.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  object  to  the  introduction  of  that 
statement  or  having  it  read  by  the  witness.    This  is  no  court  of  law. 

Mr.  BouDiN.  I  think,  Mr.  Moulder,  you  will  agree  that  a  witness 
alw^ays  has  a  right  to  state  an  objection. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Mr.  Boudin,  you  know  the  rules  of  this  committee  do 
not  permit  time  for  counsel  to  argue. 

Mr.  BouDiN.  I  am  not  arguing. 

Mr.  Doyle.  You  are  taking  time  of  the  committee.  I  ask  you  to 
desist,  please. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Please.   Let  us  have  order. 

Mr.  Kearney.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  move  that  the  witness  not  be  allowed 
to  read  that  statement. 

Mr.  Frazier.  I  will  second  that. 

Mr.  BouDiN.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  should  like 

Mr.  Moulder.  Wait  a  moment.  I  have  not  ruled  on  it  yet.  It  has 
been  moved  and  seconded  that  the  witness  should  not  be  permitted 
to  read  the  statement  for  the  record. 

Mr.  Kearney.  Let  me  explain  my  reasons.  In  this  statement  here, 
when  you  are  asked  questions  by  counsel,  you  have  the  privilege  of 
stating  everything  that  is  in  this  statement  in  objections  to  the  ques- 
tions propounded  to  you  by  counsel.  For  that  reason,  I  think  it  is 
a  lot  of  waste  of  time. 

Mr.  Moulder.  It  has  been  moved  and  seconded.  Mr.  Doyle,  how 
do  you  vote  ? 

Mr.  Doyle.  Aye. 

Mr.  Frazier.  Aye. 

Mr.  McIntosh.  Aye. 

Mr.  Kearney.  Aye. 

Mr.  Moulder.  A  majority  of  the  committee  has  so  voted  to  deprive 
the  witness  of  the  privilege*  of  reading  this  statement.  I,  for  myself, 
would  have  no  objection.  That  is  my  position  on  it.  How^ever,  4  of 
the  5  members  of  this  committee  have  so  ruled;  and,  therefore,  the 
witness  will  not  be  permitted  to  read  the  statement. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  there  is  a  question  outstanding  on  this 
record.  So  tliat  the  record  will  be  clear,  the  question  outstanding, 
Mr.  Riegger,  is:  Are  you  now,  or  have  you  ever  been,  a  member  of 
the  Communist  Party  ? 

Mr,  Riegger.  I  respectfully  decline  to  answer  on  the  following 
grounds :  The  first  amendment  of  the  Constitution  of  the  United  States 
reads,  in  part,  as  follows : 

Congress  shall  make  no  law  abridging  the  freedom  of  speech  or  of  the  press 
or  of  the  right  of  the  people  peaceably  to  assemble. 

The  House  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities  by  its  actions 
contravenes  both  the  spirit  and  the  letter  of  this  amendment.  The 
fact  that  Congress  has  legislated  this  committee  into  existence  by  no 

91198— 57— pt.  1 4 


650         COMMUNISM    m    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

means  justifies  the  committee's  unconstitutional  procedures.  As  an 
American,  I  would  fear  the  loss  of  my  self-respect  were  I  to  submit 
to  its  interrogatories. 

Mr.  Kearnfa'.  I  tliink  you  should  be  perfectly  satisfied,  Mr.  Witness. 

Mr.  EiEGGER.  Well,  in  eft'ect,  I  am. 

Mr.  Arens.  Now,  :Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  on 
this  point 

Mr.  IVIouLDER.  That  is  what  he  intended  to  give  in  response  to  your 
first  question.    I  saw  no  objection  to  him  responding  in  that  manner. 

INlr.  Arens.  On  tliis  issue  of  wliether  or  not  this  man  has  ever  been 
a  member  of  the  Communist  Party,  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  sug- 
gest that,  in  his  presence,  another  witness  be  sworn.  Mr.  Lautner, 
would  you  kindly  stand,  please  ? 

Mr.  Moulder.  You  clo  solemnly  swear  the  testimony  you  are  about 
to  give  before  the  committee  will  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and 
notliing  but  the  truth,  so  help  you  God  ? 

Mr.  Lautner.  Yes,  sir. 

TESTIMONY  OF  JOHN  LAUTNER 

Mr.  Arens.  Identify  yourself  by  name,  address,  and  occupation. 

Mr.  Lautner.  John  Lautner.  I  am  a  Government  consultant  on 
communism,  and  I  live  in  Youngstown,  Ohio. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Lautner,  liave  you  ever  been  a  member  of  the 
Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Lautner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  Please  tell  us  the  period  of  your  membership  in  the 
Communist  Party. 

Mr.  Lautner.  From  1929  to  1950,  with  the  exception  of  the  period 
of  time  I  was  in  the  Armed  Forces  during  the  war. 

Mr.  Arens.  Tell  us  just  the  highlights  of  the  posts  which  you  held 
in  the  Communist  Party. 

Mr.  Lautner.  I  was  a  Communist  Party  functionary  from  the 
year  of  1030  all  the  way  up  to  the  time  I  left  the  Communist  Party 
on  the  I7th  of  January  1950. 

I  was  district  organizer,  section  organizer,  national  bureau  secre- 
tary of  the  Communist  Party.  The  last  posts  that  I  held  were  head  of 
the  New  York  State  Review  Commission  of  the  Communist  Party  and 
a  member  of  the  National  Review  Commission  of  the  Communist 
Party. 

Mr,  Arens.  Mr.  Lautner,  during  the  course  of  your  membership  in 
the  Communist  Party,  did  you  know  as  a  Communist  a  person  by  the 
name  of  Wallingford  Riegger  ? 

Mr.  Lautner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  see  in  the  courtroom  now  the  person  who  was 
known  by  you  to  be  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  by  the  name 
of  Wallingf ord  Riegger  ? 

Mr.  Lautner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  Will  you  kindly  point  him  out  to  the  committee? 

Mr.  Lautner.  He  is  in  the  witness  seat. 

Mr.  Riegger.  You  are  looking  at  me? 

Mr.  Lautner.  Yes,  sir. 


COMMUNISM    IN   METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         651 

TESTIMONY  OF  WALUNGFORD  EIEGGER— Resumed 

Mr.  Arexs.  ]Mr.  Riegger,  j'ou  have  just  heard  tlie  testimony  of 
Mr.  John  Lautner,  in  which  he  identifies  you  as  a  member  of  the 
Communist  Party ;  is  that  correct  ?    You  heard  the  testimony. 

Mr.  Riegger.  I  respectfully  decline  to  answer  for  the  reasons  al- 
ready stated. 

Mr.  Akexs.  You  just  heard  his  testimony,  first  of  all  ^ 

Mr.  Riegger.  I  can't  help  it. 

Mr.  Arexs.  I  just  ask  you  whetlier  you  heard  his  testimony. 

Mr.  Riegger.  I  am  hard  of  hearing. 

Mr.  Arex^s.  Mr.  Lautner,  let  us  repeat  it  so  there  will  be  no  ques- 
tion as  to  the  hearing  of  this  gentleman :  Do  you  see  in  the  hearing- 
room  now,  the  person  known  by  3-011  to  have  been  a  Communist  by 
the  name  of  Wallingford  Riegger? 

Mr.  Lautxer.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Did  you  hear  him,  Mr.  Riegger  ? 

Mr.  Riegger.  I  think  I  did. 

Mr.  BouDix".  Mr.  Chairman,  may  I  ask  the  chairman  a  question 
on  procedure?  It  is  very  unusual  to  have  a  witness  interrupted  by 
another  witness  coming  in.  Are  we  permitted  to  cross-examine  Mr. 
Lautner  ? 

Mr.  Arexs.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest 

Mr.  Moulder.  Under  the  rules  of  the  committee,  you  are  prohibited. 

Mr.  BotT)ix.  Under  the  rules  of  the  committee  I  am  not  permitted 
to  cross-examine  Mr.  Lautner  ? 

Mr.  E^earxey.  You  have  appeared  before  this  committee  on  several 
occasions. 

Mr.  BocDix-^.  I  have  never  had  a  witness  interrupt  a  client  of  mine 
the  way  he  has  done. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Mr.  Riegger,  was  Mr.  Lautner  lying  or  telling  the  trutli 
when  he  just  now  swore  that  he  knew  you  as  a  member  of  the  Com- 
munist Party. 

Mr.  Lautx'er.  Functionary. 

Mr.  Arex'S.  As  a  functionary  of  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Riegger.  I  respectfully  decline  to  answer  on  the  basis  of  the 
fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arexs.  I  respectfully  suggest,  Mr.  Chairman,  that  Mr.  Lautner 
be  excused. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Can  you  give  us  information  more  specifically  as  to 
the  time  and  place  and  under  what  circumstances  and  conditions.you 
liave  made  the  statement  about  this  witness  and  identifying  him  as  a 
member  of  the  Communist  Party? 

Mr.  Lautner.  Yes,  sir;  in  1933  I  was  made  section  organizer  of 
the  Commimist  Party  on  the  West  Side,  a  territory  which  was  from 
59th  Street  to  110th  Street  and  from  Central  Park  west  to  the  Hudson 
River. 

I  functioned  there  as  a  section  organizer  from  the  fall  of  1933  up 
to  April  1936.  All  during  my  section  leadership  up  there,  Walling- 
ford  Riegger  was  a  branch  functionary  in  various  capacities  of  one 
of  the  branches  in  my  section  of  the  Communist  Party  in  New  York. 
He  was  treasurer,  branch  organizer,  and  on  the  side  he  was  also  sec- 
retary of  an  organization  called  the  Pan-American  Composers  Union. 
Whatever  it  was,  I  don't  know.    But  in  the  course  of  those  3  years. 


652         COMJMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN   MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

he  was  a  member  of  that  section.  We  met  on  numerous  occasions, 
week  in  and  week  out. 

Mr.  Moulder.  What  kind  of  meetings  ? 

Mr.  Lautner.  Party  meetings.  Either  functionary  meetings  or — 
in  most  instances  at  functionary  meetings  called  by  the  section 
leadership. 

Mr.  DoTLE.  You  mean  Communist  Party  functionary  meetings? 

Mr.  Lautner.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Arens.  How  long  have  you  been  president  emeritus  of  the 
Metropolitan  Music  School  ? 

Mr.  Eiegger.  I  respectfully  decline  to  answer  that  question  and  all 
succeeding  questions  on  the  basis  of  the  first  amendment. 

Mr.  Aeens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  the  witness  be 
ordered  and  directed  to  answer  that  question  for  the  reason  that  the 
present  posture  of  the  record  is  that  he  has  asserted,  while  he  was 
under  oath,  that  he  is  presently  president  emeritus  of  the  Metropolitan 
Music  School.  The  door  is  open  for  the  interrogation  as  to  the  length 
of  his  tenure  as  president  emeritus  of  the  Metropolitan  Music  School. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  witness  is  ordered  and  directed  to  answer  the 
question;  and,  in  so  ordering  and  directing  you  to  answer,  we  are 
not  doing  so  in  the  spirit  of  threatening  you  or  to  coerce  you,  but  for 
the  purpose  of  advising  you  and  informing  you  of  the  possible  dangers 
of  being  in  contempt  of  Congress  and  for  the  purpose  of  advising 
you  that  we  do  not  accept  your  response  to  the  question. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Eiegger,  At  the  risk  of  being  repetitious,  I  will  just  have  to 
say  that  I  still  stand  on  my  rights  as  guaranteed  by  the  first  amend- 
ment to  the  Constitution. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  been  an  officer  of  the  Pan-American 
Composers  Union  ? 

Mr.  Eiegger.  The  first  amendment  of  the  Constitution  reads  in  part 
as  follows 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  the  witness  be 
ordered  and  directed  to  answer  the  question. 

Mr.  Eiegger.  At  the  risk  of  boring  my  audience,  I  will  again  cite 
the  first  amendment  for  this  and  all 

Mr.  Moulder.  You  refuse  to  answer,  claiming  the  privilege  under 
the  amendment,  the  first  amendment  to  the  Constitution  ? 

Mr.  Eiegger.  Correct.    Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Tell  us,  if  you  please 

Mr.  Moulder.  You  are  claiming  the  first  amendment.  Therefore, 
the  committee  again  orders  and  directs  you  to  answer  for  the  same 
reasons  which  I  previously  stated. 

Mr.  Eiegger.  I  do  not  like  to  consume  the  time  of  this  committee 
here,  but  my  answer  is  the  same;  and  it  will  always  be  the  same,  no 
matter  if  you  ask  me  whether  I  am  in  this  room. 

Mr.  Arens.  Now,  sir,  please  tell  us,  were  you  formerly  president  of 
the  board  of  directors  of  the  Metropolitan  Music  School  ? 

Mr.  Eiegger.  The  answer  is  the  same  as  I  have  indicated. 

Mr.  Moulder.  And  you  are  again  ordered  and  directed  to  answer. 

Mr.  Eiegger.  I  again  repeat. 

Mr,  Arens.  Where  and  when  were  you  born  ? 

Mr.  Eiegger.  Well,  the  first  amendment  of  the  Constitution  reads 
in  part  as  follows : 


COMMUNISM    EST   METROPOLITAN   MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         653 

Congress  shall  make  no  law  abridging  the  freedom  of  speech,  or  the  press,  of 
the  rights  of  the  people  peaceably  to  assemble. 

The  House  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities  by  its  actions  con- 
travenes both  the  spirit  and  the  letter  of  this  amendment.  The  fact 
that  Congress  has  legislated  this  committee  into  existence  by  no  means 
justifies  the  committee's  unconstitutional  procedures.  As  an  Ameri- 
can, I  would  fear  the  loss  of  my  self-respect  to  submit  to  its  interroga- 
tories. 

Mr.  Moulder.  You  are  advised  by  the  committee  that  we  do  not 
accept  that  as  a  proper  response  to  the  question  which  was  propounded 
to  you  as  to  where  and  when  were  you  born.  Therefore,  you  are  again 
ordered  and  directed  to  answer  the  question  propounded  by  Counsel 
as  to  where  and  when  you  were  born. 

Mr.  KiEGGER.  I  am  sorry  that  you  don't  regard  that  as  adequate.  I 
will  simply  repeat  what  I  said  before,  if  you  wish  me  to  read  this  all 
over  again. 

Mr.  Doyle.  May  I  just  observe  this  to  you,  Mr.  Witness.  You  are 
not  being  smart  when  you  are  doing  this.     It  is  not  being  smart. 

Mr.  RiEGGER.  I  am  simply  asserting  my  rights. 

Mr.  DoTLE.  It  is  not  smart  at  all.  I  want  to  say,  Mr.  Chairman, 
that  I  think  we  are  entitled  to  know  whether  or  not  this  man  is  an 
American  citizen.  If  he  is,  how  did  he  come  by  it  ?  Was  he  born  in 
some  foreign  country  ?     If  he  was,  what  country  ? 

Mr.  Kearney.  Facetiously,  Mr.  Chairman,  I  think  we  are  entitled 
to  an  answer  to  the  question  as  to  whether  he  was  born  or  not. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Of  course,  under  the  first  amendment,  it  might  incrim- 
inate him,  according  to  his  pleading. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  witness  has  been  given  ample  opportunities  to 
respond  to  the  question.     Proceed,  Mr.  Arens. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  identified  yourself  in  an  opening  colloquy  with 
me  a  little  while  ago,  Mr.  Riegger,  as  a  musician  or  composer,  as  I  re- 
call.    Is  that  right  ? 

Mr.  Riegger.  Correct,  yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Give  us,  if  you  please,  just  the  highlights  of  your 
career  in  the  musician-composer  field. 

Mr.  Riegger.  This  would  be  a  wonderful  chance  for  some  publicity, 
but  with  great  modesty 

Mr.  Kearney.  Mr.  Chairman. 

Mr.  BouDiN.  Can  the  witness  finish  his  answer  ? 

Mr.  INIouLDER.  Yes. 

Mr.  Riegger.  I  respectfully  decline  to  answer  on  the  grounds  pre- 
viously given. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  respectfully  suggest,  Mr.  Chairman,  that  the  wit- 
ness be  ordered  and  directed  to  answer  that  question. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  witness  is  so  ordered  and  directed  to  answer 
the  question,  and  we  again  advise  you  of  the  possible  dangers  of  being 
in  contempt  of  Congress  for  your  refusal  to  answer. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  what  is  the  status  of  this  record?  I 
am  a  little  confused. 

Mr.  Moulder.  He  was  consulting  with  counsel. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  there  a  question  outstanding? 

Mr.  Riegger.  It  is  simply  this :  That,  in  regard  to  the  date  and  place 
of  my  birth,  I  will  consent  to  answer,  because  it  seems  a  bit  ridiculous 


654      COMMUNISM  m  metropolitan  music  school,  inc. 

not.  to.     I  was  born  in  1885  in  Albany,  Ga.,  of  American  parents. 

Mr.  Arens.  Now,  give  us,  if  you  please,  sir,  a  brief  sketch  of  your 
education. 

Mr.  RiEGGER.  I  feel  that  that  is  infringing  on  my  rights.  I  had  an 
education,  I  can  assure  you.  It  seems  to  have  been  adequate.  Biit 
I  do  not  see  as  I  am  obliged  to  answer  the  details  of  it  before  this 
committee. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  the  witness  be 
ordered  and  directed  to  answer  that  question. 

Mr.  Moulder.  We  refuse  to  accept  your  response  to  the  question. 
You  are  ordered  and  directed  to  answer. 

Mr.  RiEGGER.  I  will  answer  as  before ;  that  is,  standing  on  my  rights 
as  guaranteed  under  the  first  amendment  to  the  Constitution. 

Mr.  Kearney.  Mr.  Chairman,  before  counsel  asks  another  ques- 
tion, I  move  that  the  committee  adjourn  until  1 :  45  and  that  you  direct 
the  witness  to  reappear  at  that  time. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Without  objection  it  is  so  ordered.  The  witness  will 
reappear  before  the  committee  at  1 :  45  p.  m. 

(Whereupon,  at  12:  30  p.  m.,  the  committee  recessed,  to  reconvene 
at  1 :  45  p.  m.  the  same  day. ) 

(Meinbers  present  at  the  taking  of  the  recess:  Representatives  Mor- 
gan M.  Moulder,  Clyde  Do3de,  James  B.  Frazier,  Bernard  W.  Kearney, 
and  Robert  J.  Mcintosh.) 

AFTERNOON  SESSION,  TUESDAY,  APRIL  9,  1957 

(Committee  members  present:  Representatives  Moulder,  Doyle, 
Frazier,  Kearney,  and  INIcIntosh.) 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  subcommittee  will  be  in  order. 
Mr.  Riegger,  will  you  resume  the  witness  stand,  please  ? 

TESTIMONY  OF  WALLINGFORD  RIEGGER— Resumed 

Mr.  Moulder.  Proceed,  Mr.  Arens. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Riegger,  are  you  an  instructor  at  the  Metropolitan 
Music  School,  in  addition  to  your  post  as  president  emeritus  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  RiEGGER.  I  respectfully  decline  to  answer  for  the  reasons  pre- 
viously given;  that  is,  that  of  the  first  amendment,  and  so  on. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  the  witness 
now,  on  this  record,  be  ordered  and  directed  to  answer  that  question. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  witness  is  so  ordered  and  directed. 

Mr,  RiEGGER.  I  respectfully  again  decline  for  the  same  reason. 

Mr.  Arens.  Would  you  kindly  tell  us  some  of  the  highlights  of  your 
career  in  the  field  of  music  ? 

Mr.  RiEGGER.  Tempting  though  this  may  be,  I  still  claim  the  pro- 
tection of  the  first  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chainnan,  I  respectfully  suggest  the  witness  be 
ordered  and  directed  to  answer  that  question. 

Mr,  Moulder.  You  are  ordered  and  directed  by  the  committee  to 
answer  the  question,  INIr.  Riegger. 

Mr,  RiEGGER.  And  I  respectfully  repeat  my  declining. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  been  the  vice  president  of  the  American 
Composers  Alliance? 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         655 

Mr.  RiEGGER.  I  respectfully  decline  to  answer  that  question  for  the 
same  reason. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  the  witness  be 
ordered  and  directed  to  answer. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  witness  is  so  ordered  and  directed  to  answer. 

Mr.  RiEGGER.  I  thought  I  made  myself  clear  that,  from  now  on,  I 
decline  to  answer  any  further  questions  on  the  basis  of  the  first  amend- 
ment.    I  am  sorry. 

Mr.  Moulder.  At  this  point  in  the  proceeding,  as  suggested  by 
Congressman  Doyle,  I  wish  to  show  that  all  members  of  the  subcom- 
mittee are  present. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  been  president,  or  an  official,  of  the  American 
Chapter  of  International  Society  for  Contemporary  Music? 

Mr.  Riegger.  I  should  also  like  to  decline,  for  the  same  reason,  any 
answer  to  that  question. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  the  witness  be 
ordered  and  directed  to  answer  that  question. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  witness  is  requested  to  answer  the  question. 

Mr.  Riegoer.  My  answer  is  the  same  as  before. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  was  your  gainful  employment  immediately  prior 
to  your  present  status  with  the  Metropolitan  Music  School  ? 

Mr.  BouDiN.  Can  we  have  the  question  repeated  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Your  gainful  employment — what  was  your  last  gainful 
employment  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Rlegger.  I  respectfully  decline  to  answ^er,  as  before. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  witness  is  ordered  and  directed  to  answer. 

Mr.  Riegger.  I  will  have  to  repeat  myself. 

Mr.  Arens.  Now,  I  lay  before  you,  if  you  please,  sir,  a  photostatic 
reproduction  of  the  Communist  Daily  Worker  of  Wednesday,  March 
5,  1941,  in  which  a  number  of  people  sign  a  statement  in  defense  of 
the  Communist  Party,  including,  according  to  this  document,  Walling- 
ford  Riegger,  NeAv  York  City. 

Would  you  kindly  look  at  the  document  as  it  is  displayed  to  you 
and  tell  us  whether  or  not  you  are  truthfully  and  accurately  recorded 
there  as  one  who  signed  that  statement  ? 

(A  document  was  handed  to  the  witness.) 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Riegger.  I  will  admit  that  this  is  my  name  here,  and  I  don't 
see  why  I  should  not  have  signed  it.  I  think  I  would  have  signed  a 
similar  thing  today,  because  it  calls  attention  to  the  legality — 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Riegger.  This  is  a  petition  addressed  to  Congress  and  to  the 
President. 

Mr.  Arens.  Thanlv  you,  sir. 

(Document  marked  "Riegger  Exhibit  No.  1,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files. ) 

Mr.  Arens.  Now,  I  should  like  to  invite  your  attention  to  still  an- 
other exhibit. 

Mr.  BouDiN.  Mr.  Moulder,  could  we  have  the  question  and  answer 
repeated?    I  think  there  is  some  confusion  in  the  answer. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Probably  so. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  BouDiN.  Could  I  have  a  second  ? 


656         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

Mr,  RiEGGER,  It  was  not  just  yesterday,  you  know. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counseL) 

Mr.  BouDiN.  Could  we,  if  you  don't  mind,  Mr.  Moulder,  have  the 
question  and  answer  repeated  'I 

Mr.  Moulder.  Yes. 

(The  question  and  answer  were  read  by  the  reporter.) 

Mr.  BouDiN.  I  think  the  witness  wants  to  add  to  his  answer  or 
change  his  answer. 

Mr.  Moulder.  You  have  conferred  with  the  witness  ? 

Mr.  BouDiN.  Yes. 

Mr.  RiEGGER.  I  should  like  to  supplement  that  answer  by  saying  that 
I  decline  to  answer  that  question  now,  or  any  more  particulars  about 
it,  on  the  grounds  of  the  first  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Now,  we  display  to  you,  if  you  please,  sir,  a  thermofax 
reproduction  of  an  article  from  the  Communist  Daily  Worker,  en- 
titled, "Leading  Artists,  Educators  Support  Soviet  Trial  Verdict," 
with  reference  to  the  trial  in  Moscow  of  the  so-called  Trotskyite  people 
who  were  tried  and  convicted  and  shot.  This  article  refers  to  a  state- 
ment issued  in  support  of  the  verdict  and  trial  of  the  Trotskyites  in 
Soviet  Russia.  It  bears  the  names  of  a  number  of  signatories,  includ- 
ing Wallingf  ord  Riegger. 

Kindly  look  at  that  document  and  tell  this  committee  while  you 
are  under  oath,  please,  sir,  if  you  caused  your  name  to  be  used  in 
connection  with  that  statement. 

(A  document  was  handed  to  the  witness.) 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  RiEGGER.  I  decline  for  the  same  reason  as  before ;  that  is,  on  the 
grounds  of  the  first  amendment. 

(Document  marked  "Riegger  Exhibit  No.  2,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files. ) 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest,  in  view  of  the 
answer  of  the  witness,  he  be  ordered  and  directed  to  answer  that 
question. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  witness  is  so  ordered  and  directed. 

Mr.  Riegger.  I  again  respectfully  decline  to  answer  for  the  reason 
before  stated. 

Mr.  Arens.  Now,  I  lay  before  you  a  thermofax  reproduction  of  an 
open  letter  which  appeared  in  New  Masses,  December  1940.  It  is  a 
letter  defending  Luiz  Carlos  Prestes,  a  leader  of  the  Brazilian  Com- 
munist movement.  This  is  a  letter  addressed  to  the  President  of 
Brazil.  It  bears  the  names  of  a  number  of  people,  including  that  of 
Wallingford  Riegger,  musician.  New  York  City. 

Kindly  look  at  this  document,  wliile  you  are  under  oath,  and  tell  this 
committee  whether  or  not  you  caused  your  name  to  be  affixed  to  that 
open  letter  or  permitted  your  name  to  be  used  in  connection  with  that 
open  letter. 

Mr.  Riegger.  I  decline  to  answer  for  the  same  reason  as  stated 
before. 

(Document  marked  "Riegger  Exhibit  No.  3,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  the  witness  be 
ordered  and  directed  to  answer  that  last  principal  question. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  witness  is  so  ordered  and  directed. 


COMMUNISM    IN   METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         657 

Mr.  Reegger.  I  respectfully  decline,  for  the  reasons  given  before. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  yon  been  a  member  of,  or  a  sponsor  of,  the  Na- 
tional Council  of  American-Soviet  Friendship? 

Mr.  RiEGGER.  I  respectfully  decline  to  answer. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  lay  before  you  now,  two  documents  in  which  you 
are  identified  as  a  sponsor,  or  in  an  official  capacity  with  the  National 
Council  of  American-Soviet  Friendship.  Kindly  look  at  those  docu- 
ments and  tell  this  committee  while  you  are  under  oath  whether  you 
are  truly  and  accurately  described  in  your  capacity  there  with  the 
national  council. 

(A  document  was  handed  to  the  witness.) 

Mr.  Riegger.  I  again  respectfully  decline  to  answer  for  the  rea- 
son given  previously. 

(Document  marked  "Riegger  Exhibit  No.  4,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  I  respectfully  suggest,  Mr.  Chairman,  the  witness  be 
ordered  and  directed  to  answer  that  last  outstanding  question. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  witness  is  directed  as  requested  by  counsel. 

Mr.  DoTx,E.  Counsel,  may  I  ask  you  this:  I  have  in  my  hand  the 
Guide  to  Subversive  Organizations  and  Publications  as  revised  by 
the  House  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities,  on  January  2, 1957. 
I  refer  to  page  61  thereof.  I  see  here  the  National  Council  of  Ameri- 
can-Soviet Friendship  (see  also  American-Soviet  Science  Society, 
Congress  of  American-Soviet  Friendship)    and  I  read  as  follows: 

1.  Cited  as  subversive  and  Communist. 

{Attorney  General  Tom  Clark,  letters  to  Loyalty  Review  Board,  released 
December  4, 1947,  and  Septemher  21, 19J,8.) 

2.  "In   recent  months,   the  Communist   Party's  principal   front  for   all  things 

Russian   has  been   known   as    the   National    Council   for   American-Soviet 
Friendship." 

(Special  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities,  House  Report  1311  on 
the  CIO  Political  Action  Committee,  March  29,  19U,  p.  156.) 

3.  Cited  as  specializing  in  pro-Soviet  propaganda. 

(Internal   Security  Subcommittee   of   the  Senate  Judiciary   Committee, 
Handbook  for  Americans,  S.  Doc.  117,  April  23,  1956,  p.  91.) 

4.  Found  to  be  a  "Communist-front  organization"  and  ordered  to  register  as 

such  with  the  Attorney  General  of  the  United  States. 

(Subversive  Activities  Control  Board,  Decision  of  February  7, 1956. ) 

This  apparently,  then,  is  the  same  organization  about  which  you  are 
questioning  this  witness,  is  that  correct  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Yes. 

Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  will  conclude  the  staff 
interrogation  of  this  witness. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Any  questions,  Congressman  Doyle  ? 

Mr.  Doyle.  No  question. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Congressman  Kearney  ? 

Mr.  Kearney.  I  have  no  question,  Mr.  Chairman,  but  I  would  like 
to  make  an  observation  as  far  as  I  am  personally  concerned.  I  think, 
in  view  of  the  witness'  contemptuous  disregard  for  this  committee  of 
Congress,  that  when  a  proper  time  comes,  I  am  going  to  make  a 
motion  that  he  be  cited  for  contempt. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Are  there  any  questions,  Congressman  Frazier  ? 

Mr.  Frazler.  No  questions. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Have  you  any  questions.  Congressman  Mcintosh  ? 

Mr.  McIntosh.  No  questions. 


658         COMMUNISM   IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  witness  is  excused.  You  may  claim  your  wit- 
ness fees  from  the  clerk  of  the  committee. 

Mr.  Arens.  The  next  witness,  if  you  please,  Mr.  Chairman,  is  Robert 
Claiborne.     Kindly  come  forward,  Mr,  Claiborne. 

Mr.  Moulder.  You  will  be  sworn  as  a  witness,  Mr.  Claiborne.  Do 
you  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  you  are  about  to  give  before 
the  committee  will  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and  nothmg  but  the 
truth,  so  help  you  God  ? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  I  do. 

TESTIMONY  OF  ROBERT  CLAIBORNE,  ACCOMPANIED  BY  COUNSEL, 
LEONARD  B.  BOTJDIN 

Mr.  Arens.  Kindly  identify  yourself  by  name,  address,  and  occu- 
pation. 

Mr.  Claiborne.  Robert  Claiborne,  58  Banks  Street,  New  York  City. 
My  occupation  is  musician,  teacher,  and  writer. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  appearing  today,  Mr.  Claiborne,  in  response 
to  a  subpena  by  the  House  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  I  can  assure  you  I  am  not  here  voluntarily.  Yes, 
I  am  appearing  by  subpena. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  counsel  ? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  Mr,  Boudin. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Boudin,  will  you  identify  yourself  ? 

Mr.  Boudin.  Leonard  B.  Boudin,  25  Broad  Street,  New  York,  N.  Y. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Claiborne,  where  are  you  employed  ? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  Before  we  go  into  that,  would  you  introduce 
yourself,  sir  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Claiborne,  where  are  you  employed? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  Could  you  let  me  have  your  name,  sir  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  these  theatricals  that  he  is  now  under- 
taking to  pull  on  the  committee  were  pulled,  as  the  chairman  knows 
or  some  members  of  the  committee  know,  when  we  were  in  executive 
session,  I,  therefore,  now  suggest  that  the  witness  be  ordered  and 
directed  to  answer  the  question  without  further  tactics  such  as  these. 

Mr.  Doyle.  May  I  say  to  the  chairman  that  I  remember  that  this 
gentleman  asked  the  same  smart  (Question  in  executive  session. 

Mr.  Moulder,  Tlie  witness  is  ordei-ed  and  directed  to  answer  the 
(juestion, 

Mr,  Boudin,  Let  me  say  that  I  do  not  recall  that  question  being 
asked,  Mr,  Doyle. 

Mr.  DoTLE.  I  do.  I  did  not  forget  it.  I  noted  it  innnediately  at 
tliat  time — a  few  weeks  ago. 

Mr.  Arens.  Would  you  kindly  answer  the  question?  Where  are 
you  employed  ? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  am  frankly  in  some  doubt  as  to 
whether  I  can  with  safety  answer  this  question.  Would  you  advise 
me,  sir?  Does  this  committee  consider  the  teaching  of  music  an  un- 
American  activity? 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  the  witness  be 
ordered  and  directed  to  answer  that  question  that  is  outstanding. 

Mr.  Claiborne.  I  was  addressing  the  Chair,  sir,  not  you. 

INIr.  Moulder.  Your  response  is  not  proper. 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         659 

Mr.  Claiborne.  I  would  like  to  know  before  I  respond  what  the 
committee's  view^s  are  on  this  subject. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  witness  is  directed  to  answer  the  question. 

Mr.  Doyle.  May  I  answer  that?  The  w^itness  knows  veiy  well 
this  committee  does  not  hold  the  teaching  of  music  as  an  un-Ameri- 
can activity.     Now,  go  ahead. 

Mr.  Claiborne.  Well,  I  was  curious. 

Mr.  Arens.  Kindly  answer  the  question.    Where  are  you  employed  ( 

Mr.  Claiborne.  I  am  employed  at  the  Metropolitan  Music  School. 

Mr.  Arens.  In  what  capacity  % 

Mr.  Claiborne.  I  am  instructor  in  guitar  and  also  head  of  the 
fretted  instrument  department. 

Mr.  Arens.  How  long  have  you  been  connected  in  this  capacity 
witli  the  Metropolitan  Music  School? 

Mr,  Claiborne.  Do  you  mean  as  instructor? 

Mr.  Arens.  Yes. 

Mr.  Claiborne.  I  think  since  1946. 

Mr.  Arens.  How  long  have  you  been  head  of  the  fretted  instru- 
ments department  ? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  I  am  not  quite  sure.     I  think  it  is  a  matter  of 
2  or  3  years,  but  it  is  not  quite  clear  in  my  mind. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  the  board  of  directors 
of  the  Metropolitan  Music  School? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  Yes,  I  was  at  one  time. 

Mr.  A-Rens.  Do  you  recall  the  approximate  time  of  your  service? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  I  think  it  was  from  about  1948  until  the  spring  of 
last  year,  when  I  was  forced  to  resign  by  pressure  of  family  duties. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  what  have  you  taught  at  the  Metropolitan  Music 
School  ?    "V\^iat  courses  ? 

Mr.  Cl^viborne.  I  have  taught  the  glntar  and  a  course  in  nuisical 
t  heory  related  to  the  guitar  for  students  of  the  guitar. 

Mr.  BouDiN.  May  I  interrupt  by  asking  tlie  chairman  a  question? 
As  indicated,  the  witness  testified  in  executive  session  on  this  same 
general  subject.  It  would  seem  to  me  desirable  for  him  to  have  the 
executive  session  minutes  here,  if  they  are  in  the  room,  while  he 
testifies. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  counsel  now 
be  admonished  that  his  sole  and  exclusive  prerogative  in  this  proceed- 
ing is  to  advise  his  client  as  to  his  constitutional  rights. 

Mr.  MouiJ)ER.  That  is  correct,  and  the  request  is  refused.  Let  us 
proceed. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Claiborne,  have  you  ever  been  connected  with  the 
('itizens'  Coimnittee  for  the  Metropolitan  Music  School? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  To  the  best  of  my  recollection,  I  was  a  member 
of,  or  possibl}'  an  officer  of,  that  organization.  I  could  not  give  you 
1  he  dates. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  the  publicity  director  of  the  Citizens'  Com- 
mittee for  the  INIetropolitan  JNIusic  School  ? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  Have  you  any  printed  material 

Mr.  Arens.  Yes.  Perhaps  this  would  refresh  your  recollection. 
I  have  here  the  20th  Anniversary  Almanac  of  the  Metropolitan  Musii; 
School ;  and  I  invite  your  attention  specifically  to  page  6,  in  which 
your  name  appears.  Bob  Claiborne,  publicit}^  director,  under  the  head- 
ing of  the  Citizens'  Committee  of  the  Metropolitan  Music  School. 


660  COMMUNISM   IN    METROPOLITAN   MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

(The  document  was  handed  to  the  witness.) 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Claiborne.  That  looks  right.    That  looks  right. 

(Document  pre^dously  identified  as  "Ackley  Exhibit  No.  2,"  re- 
tained in  committee  files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  been  identified  or  connected  with  the 
People's  Songs,  Inc.? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  Wliat  do  you  mean  identified  or  connected  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  been  an  officer  or  an  incorporator  or  an 
official  of  People's  Songs  ? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  I  seem  to  recall  that  I  was  an  incorporator  of  it, 
in  a  more  or  less  formal  capacity. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  recall  when  that  was,  approximately? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  I  should  think  it  would  have  been  in  1946. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  on  the  editorial  board  of  People's  Songs? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  Do  you  mean  a  publication  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Claiborne.  I  may  have  been.  I  have  no  independent  recollec- 
tion of  it. 

Mr.  Arens.  Perhaps  this  would  refresh  your  recollection.  I  have 
here  a  thermof  ax  reproduction  of  the  masthead  of  People's  Songs,  in 
which  the  editorial  board  is  listed,  including  one  Bob  Claiborne,  whose 
name  also  appears  as  a  member  of  the  board  of  directors  of  People's 
Songs. 

Kindly  look  at  that  document  while  it  is  being  displayed  to  you 
and  tell  the  committee  while  you  are  under  oath  whether  or  not  that 
refreshes  your  recollection. 

(A  document  was  handed  to  the  witness.) 

Mr.  Claiborne.  It  isn't  necessary.     I  am  not  disposed  to  deny  it. 

Mr.  Arens.  Would  you  kindly  tell  us  whether  or  not  you  will 
affirm  it? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  I  cannot  independently  recollect  the  truth  of  it. 
As  I  say,  I  see  no  reason  to  deny  it.  It  was  a  perfectly  legal  organ- 
ization, engaged  in  perfectly  lawful  activities,  and  I  have  no  objection 
to  letting  the  record  stand,  that  you  have  stated  I  was  a  member  of 
the  editorial  board.  I  don't  deny  that  I  was.  I  just  can't  say  inde- 
pendently, of  my  own  recollection,  that  that  was  the  case. 

Mr.  Arens.  Thank  you,  sir. 

(Document  marked  "Claiborne  Exhibit  No.  1"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Now,  do  you  recall  authoring  a  song  called  The  Gol- 
dern  Red? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  You  are  not  going  to  tell  me  this  committee  is  going 
to  investigate  songs  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Would  you  kindly  answer  the  question  ?  Do  you  recall 
authoring  a  song  called  The  Gol-dern  Red  ? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  Yes ;  certainly  I  recall. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  should  like 

Mr.  Claiborne.  The  song  was  directed,  as  a  matter  of  fact,  against 
investigations  such  as  this — if  I  may  anticipate  your  next  question — 
as  contrary  to  the  Constitution. 

Mr.  Arens.  It  was  a  song  that  was  directed  against  the  Committee 
on  Un-American  Activities,  was  it  not  ? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  Among  others. 


COMMUNISM    EST    METROPOLITAN   MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         661 

Mr.  Arens.  The  song  reads  as  follows : 

I  went  up  to  my  boss  one  day  to  ask  hiiu  for  a  raise. 

He  wept  and  said  he  didn't  have  the  dough. 
Well,  I  knew  for  all  his  crying  that  that  plutocrat  was  lying, 

And  that's  just  what  I  told  the  So-and-so. 

And  what  d'ya  think  he  said? 
"Why,  you're  nothing  but  a  gol-dern  Red  (straight  from  Russia) . 

You're  nothing  but  a  gol-dern  Red. 
Yes ;  and  if  the  truth  be  told,  you're  receiving  Moscow  gold. 

Yes  ;  you're  nothing  but  a  gol-dern  Red." 

(Document  marked  "Claiborne  Exhibit  No.  2"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  At  this  point  I  would  like  to  ask  you :  Are  you,  Kobert 
Claiborne,  now,  or  have  vou  ever  been,  a  member  of  the  Communist 
Party? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  Mr.  Chairman,  would  you  advise  me  on  this:  In 
answering  this  question,  I  would  like  to,  for  the  record,  attach  certain 
qualifications  to  my  answer.  Is  it  your  wish  that  I  state  my  qualifica- 
tions first  and  then  answer  the  question,  or  answer  the  question  first 
and  then  state  the  qualifications  to  it  ? 

Mr.  Moulder.  I  am  rather  confused  myself. 

Mr.  Clajborne.  Well,  it  is  very  simple.  Do  you  want  me  to  an- 
swer the  question  and  then  state  the  qualifications  that  I  have  to  my 
answer?  I  want  to  attach  certain  qualifications  to  it,  certain  reser- 
vations, certain  statements  for  the  record,  in  relation  to  the  answer. 
Or  do  you  want  me  to  state  the  reservations  first  and  then  give  the 
answer  ? 

Mr.  Moulder.  You  proceed  to  answer  the  question  as  you  choose. 

Mr.  Claiborne.  O.  K.  Well,  then,  if  ;70u  give  me  my  choice,  I 
will  state  first,  before  answering  the  question,  that  I  object 

Mr.  Moulder.  I  see  what  you  mean  now.  No.  Answer  the  ques- 
tion and  then  give  your  reasons  therefor. 

Mr.  Claiborne.  Very  good.  Very  well.  The  answer  to  the  ques- 
tion is  that  I  have  not,  for  a  number  of  years,  been  a  member  of  the 
Communist  Party.  Now,  in  connection  with  that,  I  would  like  to 
observe  for  the  record  that  I  object  to  this  question.  I  object  to  any 
similar  question  of  myself  or  of  anyone  on  the  matter  of  political 
beliefs  or  political  affiliations,  on  the  grounds  that  it  is  not  within  the 
purview  of  the  lawful  power  of  the  Congress  to  investigate  where  it 
cannot  legislate,  as  the  Constitution  says,  on  matters  of  speech,  of 
association,  of  assembly,  and  so  forth.  So  I  would  like  the  record  to 
be  quite  clear  that  I  am  answering  this  question,  not  because  I  for 
one  moment  concede  the  authority  of  this  committee  to  ask  it  or  re- 
quire me  to  answer,  but  merely  because  I  choose  to  answer  it. 

Mr.  Moulder.  That  does  not  fully  answer  the  question.  Mr. 
Claiborne,  the  question  was,  Are  you  now,  or  have  you  ever  been,  a 
member  of  the  Communist  Party.  Your  response  was  that  you  have 
not  been  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  for  a  number  of  years,  and 
then  you  gave  your  reasons  for  making  that  statement. 

Mr.  Claiborne.  What  is  the  procedure? 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  question  is  pending.  You  partially  answered 
the  question.     Have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  Very  good.  Now,  on  that  subject,  I  decline  to 
answer,  and  my  reasons  for  doing  so  are  as  follows :  First,  the  grounds 


662         COIVUMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

I  have  already  stated,  that  the  asking  of  such  a  question  is  outside 
of  the  constitutional  powers  of  Congress ;  indeed,  in  my  opinion,  the 
existence  of  this  committee  is  in  violation  of  the  constitutional  powers 
of  Congress.  That  is  my  first  reason.  My  second  reason  is  that  this 
committee  is  attempting  to  deprive  me  of  my  constitutional  liberties 
"without  due  process  of  law.  My  third  reason  is  a  little  bit  more  com- 
plicated. I  would  like  it  on  record  that,  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge 
and  belief,  I  have  committed  no  crime.  Nonetheless,  there  is  a  pos- 
sibility that  a  truthful  answer  to  this  question  might  result  in  my 
being  indicted  on  some  broad  political  charge. 

I  am  quite  certain  that  I  would  not  be  convicted  on  such  a  charge, 
but  I  am  equally  certain  that  winning  an  acquittal,  which  I  would  do 
and  could  do,  would  cost  me  several  thousand  dollars,  which  I  do  not 
have.  I  am,  therefore,  compelled  to  invoke  my  constitutional  privi- 
lege not  to  be  a  witness  against  myself  because  I  cannot  afford  to 
engage  in  litigation. 

Mr,  Arens.  Now,  sir,  the  record  reflects  that  you  stated  a  moment 
ago  that  you  have  not  been  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  for  a 
number  of  years. 

Mr.  Claiborne.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Arens.  For  how  many  years  have  you  not  been  a  member  of 
tlie  Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  Well,  I  don't  think  I  care  to  be — ^wait  a  minute. 
Yes,  that  question  is  correctly  put.  I  thought  for  a  minute  it  was 
a  little  bit  loose.  I  would  prefer  not  to  be  too  precise  about  it^  Let 
us  say  for  not  less  than  3,  and  not  more  than  5,  years. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  have  not  been  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party 
for  not  less  than  3,  or  more  than  5,  years,  is  that  correct? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  resign,  technically,  membership  in  the  Com- 
munist Party  so  that  you  could  face  the  world  and  deny  truthfully 
technical  membership  in  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  Mr.  Counsel,  you  are  forgetting  that  I  have  at  no 
time  said  that  I  was  a  member.  Therefore,  questions  about  resigning 
are  a  little  bit  out  of  order,  don't  you  think  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  this  record  re- 
flect an  order  and  direction  to  tlie  witness  to  answer  the  last  outstand- 
ing question. 

Jkir,  Moulder.  Yes;  the  witness  is  ordered  and  directed  to  answer 
the  question.  As  I  stated  before,  the  direction  is  given  to  advise  and 
inform  you  that  the  committee  refuses  to  accept  your  response  to  the 
question  and  advises  jou  of  the  possible  danger  of  being  m  contempt 
of  Congress. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Claiborne.  Could  I  have  the  question  again,  please? 

(The  pending  question  was  read  by  the  reporter.) 

Mr.  Claiborne.  I  seem  to  gather  from  this,  Mr.  Counsel — I  believe 
your  name  is  Arens,  isn't  it,  sir  ? 

Mr.  Moulder.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Claiborne.  I  seem  to  gather  from  this,  Mr.  Arens,  that,  accord- 
ing to  your  theory,  there  are  two  kinds  of  membership  in  the  Com- 
munist Party,  technical  membersliip  and  nontechnical  membership. 
I  am  frank  to  say  that  this  is  not  in  accordance  with  m}^  understand- 
ing of  the  subject.    I  wish  you  would  enligliten  me. 


COMMUNISx.      IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         663 

Mr.  Arens.  I  am  glad,  to  have  you  make  that  observation.  Now, 
tell  us,  what  is  the  source  of  your  understanding  of  the  subject? 

Mr.  Claiborxe.  I  have  done  a  good  deal  of  reading  and  studying. 

Mr.  Akens.  Is  there  any  other  source  of  your  information  on  the 
subject? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  What  subject  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  The  subject  of  membership  in  the  Communist  Party. 

Mr.  Claiborne.  Well,  to  the  best  of  my  belief,  there  is  only  one 
competent  source  on  the  qualifications  and  requirements  of  member- 
sliip  in  the  Communist  Party  and  that  is  the  Constitution. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  base  your  conclusion  or  observation  on  per- 
sonal experience  in  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  Well,  now,  you  know  that  is  just  another  way  of 
asking  if  I  have  ever  been  a  member;  and  I  have  already  refused  to 
answer  that,  giving  my  ground  in  full.  I  am  certainly  not  going  to 
answer  it  under  another  guise. 

Mr.  Arens.  In  view  of  that  answer,  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully 
suggest  that  he  be  ordered  and  directed  to  answer  the  question. 

Mr.  Kearney.  Mr.  Chairman,  let  me  get  this  straight  in  my  mind. 
With  all  the  witness'  evasions  here,  I  am  getting  pretty  well  con- 
fused over  his  testimony.  Did  I  understand  you  to  say  a  minute 
ago,  in  response  to  tlie  counsel's  question,  that  you  had  not  been  a 
member  of  the  Communist  Party  from  either  3  to  5  years  ? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  Yes,  that  is  correct. 

Mr.  Kearney.  That  is  what  I  thought. 

Mr.  Claiborne.  Not  less  than  3  and  not  more  than  5. 

Mr.  Kearney.  Not  less  than  3  nor  more  than  5  ? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  Without  any  implications  to  the  period  before  that, 
whether  I  was  or  was  not.    That  I  do  not  affirm  and  do  not  deny. 

Mr.  Kearney.  Well,  you  want  to  eat  your  cake  and  have  it,  too? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  No,  sir.  I  made  a  statement  that  I  had  not  been 
a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  within  a  particular  period  of 
time.    As  to  a  particular  period  prior  to  that,  I  decline  to  answer. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  deny  technical  membership  in  the  Communist 
Party  so  that  you  could  face  the  world  and  deny  membership  in  the 
Coimnunist  Party? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  What  do  you  mean  "technical  membership''?  It 
seems  to  me  that  you  are  either  a  member  or  you  are  not. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  resign  membership  in  the  Connnunist  Party? 
We  will  start  there. 

Mr.  Claiborne.  Well,  to  answer  that,  I  would  obviously  have  to 
state,  to  admit  what  I  have  refused  to  admit,  that  I  was  a  member. 
Therefore,  I  certainly  can't  answer  that. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  certainly  suggest,  in  view  of  this  re- 
sponse, that  the  witness  be  ordered  and  directed  to  answer  the 
question. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  witness  is  ordered  and  directed  to  answer  the 
({uestion. 

Mr.  Claiborne.  I  refuse  to  on  the  same  grounds  that  I  essentially 
refused  to  answer  a  moment  ago. 

Mr.  Arens.  Now,  I  have  another 

Mr.  BouDiN.  May  I  ask  if  the  record  is  clear  as  to  the  reasons  for 
t  he  witness'  refusal  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Yes,  we  understand  that. 


664         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

Mr.  BouDiN.  I  certainly  did  not  want  it  to  interfere  with  your 
examination,  Mr.  Arens. 

Mr.  Arens.  We  appreciate  that.  We  have  here  a  song,  "It's  My 
Union,"  words  and  music  written  by  Bob  Claiborne.  Do  you  recall 
writing  that  song,  "It's  My  Union."  ? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  What  happened  to  the  other  song,  by  the  way? 
We  w^ere  on  that  and  somehow  we  got  off  it. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  now  respectfully  suggest  and  request 
that  the  witness  be  ordered  and  directed  to  answer  that  question. 

Mr.  Claiborne.  I  certainly  have  no  reason  to  conceal  that,  Mr. 
Chairman.    I  am  very  proud  to  have  written  that  song. 

As  a  matter  of  fact,  it  was  the  official  Labor  Day  song  in  San  Fran- 
cisco in  1946  or  1947, 1  am  told. 

(Document  marked  "Claiborne  Exhibit  No.  3,"  and  retamed  in 
committee  files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Was  that  written  in  connection  with  the  work  of  the 
Mine,  Mill  and  Smelter  Workers  Union  ? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  I  believe  that  it  was.  I  am  trying  to  remember 
the  exact  circumstances.  I  think  that  actually  it  was  written  on  com- 
mission from  them.  It  is  a  fine  union,  one  of  the  oldest  in  this  counti-y 
and  a  very  strong  union.    I  was  a  member  of  it  at  one  time. 

Mr.  Arens.  Had  it  been  expelled  from  the  CIO  as  a  Communist- 
controlled  union  as  of  the  time  you  wrote  the  song  for  it,  or  on  com- 
mission from  it? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  Do  you  have  any  dates  on  when  that  expulsion 
took  place  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  I  have  the  date  here  of  your  song.  It  is  copyrighted 
in  1947.  I  was  wondering  if  you  could  recall  whether  or  not  that  was 
before  or  after  the  expulsion  of  the  International  Union  of  Mine,  Mill 
and  Smelter  Workers. 

Mr.  Claiborne.  Don't  you  know  when  the  expulsion  took  place? 

Mr.  Arens.  It  was  in  1947. 

Mr.  Claiborne.  They  are  both  in  1947.  I  really  don't  have  any 
recollection  one  way  or  the  other. 

Mr.  BouDiN.  Mr.  Chairman,  the  expulsion  referred  to  took  place 
in  1948  or  1950  of  various  unions  from  the  CIO.  I  don't  want  Mr. 
Arens  to  be  misled. 

Mr.  Arens.  We  have  it  here  in  the  record.    I  can  check  it. 

Was  the  commission  to  you  to  write  this  song,  "It's  My  Union,"  a 
commission  directed  to  you  by  any  person  known  to  you  to  have  been 
a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  The  commission,  as  I  recall,  was  directed  to  me 
by  officers  of  the  union. 

Mr.  Arens.  Wlio  were  they  ?    Do  you  recall  ? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  Lord,  it  is  a  long  time  ago. 

Mr.  Arens.  Was  Maurice  Travis  one  of  the  officers  who  commis- 
sioned you  to  write  this  song  ? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  As  I  recall,  this  was  a  matter  that  was  handled  by 
letter;  and  I  couldn't  truthfully  tell  you  now  who  signed  the  letter. 
This  is  a  matter  of  10  years  ago.  It  was  not  a  continuing  contract 
over  the  years.  I  am  not  even  sure  I  ever  met  Mr.  Travis,  let  alone 
whether  he  signed  the  letter.  I  think  it  may  have  been.  This  is 
purely  a  very  loose  opinion.  It  may  have  been  Gran  [Graham]  Dolan 
who  was,  I  believe,  at  that  time,  educational  director  of  the  union. 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         665 

Mr.  Arexs.  Do  3'ou  know  wliether  Mr.  Dolan  is  a  Communist  or 
has  been  a  Communist  ? 

Mr,  Claiborne.  I  haven't  seen  Mr.  Dohm^ — I  think  I  met  him  in 
1947. 

Mr.  Arens.  Now,  answer  the  question.    Do  you  know  whether  Mr. 
Dolan  is  or  has  been  a  Connnunist? 
Mr,  Claiborne.  No,  I  have  no  notion. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  cliano;e  your  position  with  reference  to  the 
International  Union  of  ^Mine,  ]\Iill  and  Smelter  Workers,  concern- 
\n^  which  or<^anization  you  wrote  this  laudatory  song,  after  you 
learned  that  it  had  been  ejected  from  the  CIO  because  the  CIO  found 
that  it  was  controlled  by  the  Communist  conspiracy  ? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  Just  a  moment.  Your  question  contains  a  perhaps 
natural,  but  not  quite  correct,  assumption.  The  song  was  written 
not  specifically  in  praise  of  the  Mine,  INIill  and  Smelter  Workers, 
but  in  praise  of  any  union  which  is  democratically  controlled  by  its 
members  as  opposed,  let  us  say,  to  a  union  such  as  the  one  Mr.  Dave 
Beck  is  connected  with.  That  sentiment  in  favor  of  democratic  mem- 
bership control  of  unions  is  one  that  I  remain  in  favor  of  absolutely. 
Mr.  Arens.  Yes.  Now,  a  little  while  ago,  you  were  lauding  the 
International  Union  of  Mine,  Mill  and  Snielter  Workers,  were  you 
not? 

Mr,  Claiborne.  From  my  observation  which — understand,  I  am 
not  a  specialist,  but  I  try  to  keep  up  to  date — from  my  observation, 
it  is  a  union  which  has  fought  very  hard  for  better  conditions  for 
its  members,  many  of  whom  have  hard  and  very  dangerous  jobs.  It 
is  a  union  which  has,  I  understand,  even  brought  a  measure  of 
democracy  to  some  of  the  company  towns  out  in  our  great  Mountain 
States,  where  the  towns  used  to  be  entirely  under  the  domination  of 
mining  companies. 

]Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  know  that  Maurice  Travis,  the  head  of  that 
organization  or  the  principal  moving  force  of  the  organization,  has 
been  repeatedly  identified  under  oath  as  a  member  of  the  interna- 
tional Communist  conspiracy? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  I  may  have  read  something  of  that  sort.  I  don't 
really  recall.  I  will  tell  you  truthfully,  Mr.  Counsel,  that  I  don't 
really  care.  Mr.  Travis,  from  my  observation,  is  doing  a  fine  job  for 
his  members;  the  members  elect  him,  and  he  is  the  man  they  want,  I 
say  in  this  country,  thank  God,  people  are  still  free  in  some  cases  to 
elect  people  whom  they  want  to  represent  them. 

Mr.  Arens.  Now,  I  would  like  to  ask  you,  if  you  please,  about  a 
fighting  songfest,  which,  according  to  the  Communist  Daily  Worker, 

was  held  at  a  IManhattan  theater  here 

Mr.  Claiborne.  Here  in  New  York  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Yes,  sir;  under  the  auspices  of  the  Music  Section  of 
the  Communist  Party,  and  one  of  the  leading  lights  in  this  fighting 
songfest,  according  to  the  Communist  Daily  Worker  of  April  13, 1949, 
page  7,  is  one  Bob  Claiborne. 

Kindly  look  at  this  advertisement  which  will  now  be  displayed  to 
you  and  see  if  that,  first  of  all,  refreshes  your  recollection  with  ref- 
erence to  that  fighting  songfest. 

(A  document  was  handed  to  the  witness.) 

Mr.  Moulder.  Let  counsel  examine  the  document,  also, 

91198— 57— pt.  1 5 


666         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

Mr.  BouDiN.  Thank  you. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  connseL) 

Mr,  Claiborne,  You  don't  mean  the  three  prosecutors  at  Foley 
Square  ? 

Mr.  BouDiN.  What  was  the  question,  Mr,  Arens? 

Mr.  Arens.  I  think  he  knows. 

Mr.  Claiborne.  Do  I  recollect  this  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Yes,  Were  you  the  Robert  Claiborne  connected  there 
as  one  of  the  leaders  of  this  fighting  songfest  held  under  the  auspices 
of  the  Communist  Party  at  Manhattan  Center  on  the  date  indicated 
on  the  Communist  Daily  Worker  ?     I  believe  it  is  in  1949, 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel,) 

Mr,  Claiborne.  Frankly,  Mr,  Arens,  at  this  time,  I  was  appearing 
sometimes  several  times  a  week  at  various  musical  programs  or  some- 
thing of  the  sort,  singing ;  and  I  have  no  independent  recollection  of 
this  thing.     As  a  matter  of  fact,  I  am  afraid  you  are  mistaken. 

It  says  here  it  is  the  Yugoslav- American  Home,  not  Manhattan 
Center.  That  doesn't  help  matters,  I  am  afraid.  I  just  have  no  inde- 
pendent recollection  of  1947,  1948,  1949,  1950,  and  1951.  I  must 
have  appeared  at  several  hundred  occasions  where  I  sang. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  have  no  independent  recollection  of  it,  is  that 
correct  ? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  I  have  no  independent  recollection. 

(Document  marked  "Claiborne  Exhibit  No.  4,"  and  retained  in 
Committee  files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Thank  you.  Now,  I  would  like  to  come  up  a  little  more 
in  the  chronology  of  your  life,  and  perhaps  we  can  get  to  a  time 
when  you  do  have  recollection. 

I  have  here  a  photostatic  copy  of  the  Communist  Daily  Worker  of 
Thursday,  July  1,  1954,  "Packed  Rally  Honors  Ben  Davis."  He  was 
former  city  councilman  here,  as  you  know,  and  repeatedly  identified 
as  a  member  of  the  national  committee  of  the  Communist  conspira- 
torial apparatus.  According  to  this  Communist  Daily  Worker  of 
1954,  in  this  packed  rally  honoring  Ben  Davis,  there  was  a  "cultural 
salute  to  Davis"  by  songs  by  a  number  of  people  including  "Bob 
Claibourne," 

Please  look  at  this  as  it  is  displayed  to  you  and  see  if  that  refreshes 
your  recollection  with  reference  to  that  occasion, 

(A  document  was  handed  to  the  witness.) 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr,  Claiborne,  It  doesn't  seem  to  be  clear,  here,  whether  this  refers 
to  songs  sung  by  or  written  by.     It  says  songs  by, 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  in  attendance  at  that  session? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr,  Claiborne.  I  have  only  a  very  dim  recollection  of  this  thing. 
I  will  say,  to  the  best  of  my  recollection,  it  was  not  sponsored  by  the 
Communist  Party.     I  think  that  is  all  I  can  say  on  the  subject, 

Mr,  Arens,  Does  your  dim  recollection  include  a  recollection  of 
your  attendance  or  participation  in  that  affair  for  Ben  Davis  ? 

Mr,  Claiborne,  I  have  no  clear  picture  of  it  in  my  mind.  You 
have  to  understand  that,  when  over  a  period  of  years,  you  have  at- 
tended many,  many  meetings,  musical  events,  and  so  forth,  one  tends 
to  blur  into  another.  It  is  conceivable  that  I  might  have  been  there. 
It  is  equally  conceivable  that  they  might  have  gotten  my  name  from 


COMMUNISM    nsr    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         667 

somewhere  else.  I  honestly  don't  know.  Or  it  may  have  been  that 
tliey  just  used  songs  which  I  had  written  but  without  my  personal 
presence. 

(Document  marked  "Claiborne  Exhibit  No.  5,"  and  retained  in 
committee  files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Perhaps  you  could  help  us  on  this  next  one,  then. 

Mr.  Moulder.  How  do  you  know  it  was  not  sponsored  by  the  Com- 
munist Party  ? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  The  story  doesn't  say  so  here.  Let  us  put  it  this 
way,  as  I  recollect  my  general  feeling.  In  1954,  while  I  certainly 
would  have  appeared  at  an  event  sponsored  by  some  nonpartisan  or- 
ganizations against  the  Smith  Act  which  I  regarded  then,  as  I  regard 
now,  as  a  dangerous  and  unconstitutional  and  un-American  piece  of 
legislation 

ISIr.  IvEARXEY.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  would  suggest  that  the  witness 
answer  the  question  instead  of  making  these  continuing  speeches.  It 
is  nothing  but  a  stalling  game.  He  has  been  that  wa}^  ever  since  he 
has  been  on  the  stand. 

Mr.  Claiborne.  I  am  tiying  to  answer  the  question,  ]\Ir.  Kearney,  if 
you  will  give  me  a  chance.  I  am  trying  to  give  you  my  reasoning  as 
to  why  I  don't  think  it  was  sponsored  by  the  Communist  Party. 

As  I  say,  while  I  would  have  attended  a  rally  protesting  the  Smith 
Act  for  the  reasons  that  I  have  given,  I  do  not  think,  as  I  recollect 
my  thinking,  my  feelings  at  the  time,  that  I  would  have  cared  to  at- 
tend a  rally  sponsored  by  the  Communist  Party. 

]\Ir.  Moulder.  That  is  going  on  the  assumption,  then,  that  you  did 
attend  such  a  rally,  the  rally  referred  to  by  counsel  ? 

Mr,  Claiborne.  That  is  going  on  the  assumption  that  I  did  attend. 
As  I  say,  I  haven't  got  any  clear  recollection.  But  assuming  that  it 
was  not  sponsored  by  the  Communist  Party,  I  would  say  it  was  pos- 
sible that  I  did.  Assuming  that  it  was  sponsored  by  the  Communist 
Party,  I  should  say  it  was  quite  likely  that  I  did  not. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Proceed  with  the  next  question. 

Mr.  Arens.  As  a  person  who  is  on  the  faculty  of  the  Metropolitan 
Music  School,  do  you  presently  have  information  respecting  people 
who  are  on  the  faculty  of  the  Metropolitan  INIusic  School,  who,  to  your 
certain  knowledge,  have  been  members  of  the  Communist  Party? 

Mr,  Claiborne.  Let  me  have  that  again,  please. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Should  the  question  be  phrased  as,  do  you  have  any 
such  knowledge?  Do  you  have  any  knowledge  of  any  members  of 
the  faculty  ? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  I  have  no  knowledge  as  to  the  political  affiliations 
presently  as  to  any  members  of  the  faculty. 

Mr.  Arens.  Take  out  the  word  "presently."  Do  you  know  people 
on  the  faculty  who,  to  your  certain  knowledge,  have  been  members 
of  the  Communist  Party  ?  By  faculty,  I  mean  faculty  of  the  Metro- 
politan Music  School. 

Mr.  Claiborne.  When  you  say  "certain  knowledge,"  precisely  what 
does  that  mean  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  the  witness 
be  ordered  and  directed  to  answer  the  question. 

Mr.  Claiborne.  How  can  you  be  certain  about  a  thing  like  that  ?  I 
am  getting  to  a  point,  Mr.  Counsel.  The  only  way  that  I  think,  from 
what  I  have  heard,  that  one  can  be  certain  is  if  one  was  a  member  of 


668         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

the  Communist  Party  with  them.  Since  you  have  already  asked  me 
whether  I  ever  was  a  member  and  since  I  have  ah^eady  refused  to 
answer,  then  I  am  going  to  refuse  to  answer  the  question,  no  matter 
how  you  dress  it  up. 

Mr.  Moulder.  For  what  reasons  ? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  For  the  reasons  that  I  ah^eady  refused  to  answer 
the  question  of  "Have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  the  Communist 
Party  ?"    It  is  the  same  reasons. 

Mr.  Arens.  Perliaps  you  can  lielp  us  on  the  next  exhibit.  This  is 
a  photostatic  reproduction  of  this  Communist  Daily  Worker  of  May 
19-19  (May  4).  I  want  to  invite  your  attention  specifically  to  this 
article  about  a  review  put  on  by  the  Communist  cultural  division 
[Music  Section  of  the  Cultural  Division  of  the  Communist  Party]. 
It  was  given  in  the  honor  of  the  12  indicted  Communist  party  leaders. 

Mr.  Claiborne.  What  was  the  date? 

Mr.  Arens.  1949.  I  should  like  to  read  you  an  excerpt  from  this 
article : 

Now,  Is  The  Time,  a  program  of  songs  and  topical  satire.  Auspices  of  the 
Music  Section  of  the  Cultural  Division  of  the  Communist  Party.  Script  by 
Lee  Hays.     With  Bob  Claiborne,  Betty  Sanders- — 

and  so  forth. 

Kindly  look  at  that  article  as  it  is  displayed  to  you  and  see  if  it 
refreshes  your  recollection  with  reference  to  your  participation  in 
the  script,  or  in  the  production  of  the  songs,  for  this  cultural  unit 
of  the  Communist  Party  in  its  commemoration  of  tlie  indictment  of 
the  12  Communist  traitors. 

(A  document  was  handed  to  the  witness.) 

Mr.  Claiborne.  Correction  please.  They  were  not,  as  you  very 
well  know,  sir,  convicted  of  treason.  They  were  convicted  of  teaching, 
and  conspiring  to  teach,  the  overthrow  of  the  Government.  The  Con- 
stitution is  very  specific  on  tlie  definition  of  treason. 

Mr.  Kearney.  The  verdict  of  the  jury  was  specific. 

Mr.  Claiborne.  Yes,  to  advocate  and  teach  the  overthrow  of  the 
Government  by  force  and  violence.  It  was  not  convicting  them  of 
advocating,  but  conspiracy  to  advocate. 

Well,  I  think  I  am  going  to  refuse  to  answer  this  on  the  same 
grounds  as  I  already  gave. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  it  the  lack  of  recollection  or  is  it  something  else? 
I  want  the  record  to  be  sui'e. 

Mr.  Claiborne.  No,  this  is  the  same  grounds  as  I  gave  on  tlie  ques- 
tion of  "Have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party?" 

(Document  marked  "Claiborne  Exhibit  No.  6,"  and  retained  in 
committee  files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Now,  I  would  like  to  lay  before  you  a  photostatic  repro- 
duction of  still  another  issue  of  the  Communist  Daily  Worker,  New 
York,  April  1,  1949  (p.  5).    It  is  a  brief  article.    I  will  read  most  of  it : 

Anti-Franco  Songs  at  Peace  Caucus 

A  new  series  of  anti-Franco  songs  will  be  premiered  at  the  Joint  Anti- 
Fascist  Refugee  Committee's  Caucus  for  Peace  in  Manhattan  Center,  Monday 
evening.  Pete  Seeger,  .Toe  Jaffe,  Ernie  Lieberman  and  Bob  Claiborne  of  People's 
Artists  will  present  tlie  new  songs  which  have  been  specially  written  for  the 
occasion. 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN   MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         669 

Kindly  look  at  this  exhibit  as  it  is  displayed  to  you,  please,  sir,  and 
see  if  it  refreshes  your  recollection  with  reference  to  the  production 
b}^  yourself  of  certain  son<;s  which  were  used  on  that  occasion. 

(A  document  was  handed  to  the  witness.) 

Mr.  Claiborne.  Excuse  me.  It  does  not  say  the  songs  were  written 
by  me.  As  a  matter  of  fact,  to  the  best  of  my  recollection,  they 
weren't.  It  merely  says  they  will  be  presented  by,  and  I  am  quite 
free  to  say  that  I  was  there — as  I  will  always,  I  hope,  be  at  any 
manifestation  against  Franco. 

(Document  marked  "Claiborne  Exhibit  No.  7,"  and  retained  in 
committee  files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  been  participating  in  any  manifestations 
against  Stalin? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  He  is  dead.    Franco  isn't. 

Mr.  Arens.  During  his  lifetime,  did  you  participate  in  any  mani- 
festations against  him? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  I  don't  know  that  anybody  ever  asked  me. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  didn't  volunteer  or  initiate  any  such  demonstra- 
tion ;  did  you  ? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  I  haven't  done  much  in  the  way  of  volunteering  or 
initiating  demonstrations,  Mr.  Arens.  Where  I  have  been  asked, 
and  where  I  agreed  with  the  purpose  of  a  manifestation  or  a  demon- 
stration, I  have  always  tried  to  say  where  I  stood,  quite  frankly. 

Mr.  Arens.  Then  tell  us  frankly  now,  where  you  stand  with  refer- 
enc  to  Comrade  Stalin. 

Mr.  Claiborne.  You  are  referring  to  him,  I  suppose,  as  your  com- 
rade because  he  certainly  isn't  mine.  I  told  you  I  am  not  a  member  of 
the  Communist  Party.    What  else  would  you  like  to  know  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party 
and  are  you  under  Communist  Party  discipline.?  That  is  what  I 
would  like  to  know. 

Mr.  Claiborne.  When  you  say  Communist  Party  discipline,  that 
is  an  interesting  phrase.  I  don't  know  that  it  has  been  legally  de- 
fined. If  you  mean  that  the  Communist  Party  can  call  me  up  and 
say,  "Claiborne,  we  want  you  to  do  so  and  so,"  then  the  answer  is 
certainly  not. 

Mr.  Frazier.  Mr.  Chairman? 

Mr,  Moulder.  Congressman  Frazier  ? 

Mr.  Frazier.  I  move  that  you  direct  the  witness  to  answer  the 
question. 

Mr.  Moulder.  The  witness  is  ordered  and  directed  to  answer  the 
question. 

Mr.  Claiborne.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  find  it  impossible  to  answer  the 
question  further  unless  I  can  get  a  definition  from  the  counsel  as  to 
what  Communist  Party  discipline  is. 

Mr.  Frazier.  May  I  ask  you  if  you  have  been  a  member  of  the 
Communist  Party  or  have  ever  been  a  member  of  the  Communist 
Party  ?    You  can  answer  that. 

Mr.  Claiborne.  I  said  3  or  4  times,  I  am  not  a  member. 

Mr.  Frazier.  I  said,  have  you  ever  been  a  member  ? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  I  have  refused  3  or  4  times  to  answer  that,  and 
I  have  given  my  grounds.  The  question  has  come  up  as  to  Commu- 
nist Party  discipline. 


670         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

]\Ir.  Moulder.  Maybe  1  can  clarify  it  by  asking  are  you,  in  any 
way,  now  under  the  direction  or  influence  of  tlie  Communist  Party? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  Well,  as  far  as  influence  goes,  I  am  under  any 
number  of  influences.  I  read  a  great  many  publications.  I  listen 
to  a  great  many  people ;  and  if  I  agree  with  them,  you  can  say  that  I 
am  influenced  by  them. 

If  you  mean  do  I  agree  with  the  Communist  Party  100  percent, 
no,  I  certainly  do  not.  If  you  mean  are  they  able  to  tell  me  what 
to  do  and  I  feel  that  I  must  do  it,  simply  because  they  say  it ;  if  this 
is  what  you  mean  by  Communist  Party  discipline,  certainly  not.  As 
a  matter  of  fact,  I  don't  think  there  is  anybody,  except  possibly  my 
wife,  that  is  in  that  position. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Are  there  any  further  questions  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  No  further  questions,  Mr.  Chairman. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Any  question,  Congressman  Doyle  ? 

Mr.  Doyle.  I  think,  in  view  of  the  witness'  claim  of  the  first 
amendment  privilege  and  his  statement  that  he  has  read  a  great  deal, 
I  want  to  read  from  this  brief  of  the  American  Bar  Association  in 
the  case  of  Watkins  versus  the  United  States  of  America. 

Mr.  Claiborne.  How  about  the  remarks  of  the  California  Bar 
Association  relative  to  the  conduct  of  the  counsel  of  this  committee? 

Mr.  Doyle.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Claiborne.  I  will  exercise  my  rights  of  free  speech,  sir. 

Mr.  Doyle.  You  are  very  smart.  Let  me  read  you  the  decision 
of  the  United  States  Supreme  Court  and  see  if  you  are  as  smart  as 
the  Court  is. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Claiborne.  I  thought  you  said  the  brief  of  the  American 
Bar  Association.     Which  is  this  ? 

Mr.  Doyle.  I  am  reading  from  a  brief  quoting  the  United  States 
Supreme  Court  decision,  as  long  as  your  counsel  has  called  attention 
to  it  when  I  mentioned  the  bar  association  brief. 

Mr.  Claiborne.  I  am  sorry  I  interrupted  you.  I  wanted  to  be 
clear  as  to  what  you  were  quoting  from. 

Mr.  Doyle.  I  am  reading  from  page  6  in  this  brief  in  this  case : 

A  most  recent  case,  decided  January  3,  1957,  dealing  with  the  similar  issues 
to  those  involved  in  the  Watkins  case,  in  Barenblatt  v.  United  States,  No.  13,327, 
United  States  Court  of  Appeals  for  the  District  of  Columbia  Circuit.  The 
opinion,  written  by  Judge  Bastian — 

Counsel,  will  you  please  allow  your  witness  to  listen  ?  If  you  want 
to  consult  with  him,  go  ahead  and  do  it,  and  then  I  will  finish  reading. 

Mr.  Claiborne.  The   opinion  written  by  Judge  Bastian. 

Mr.  Moulder.  I  see  no  point  in  arguing  with  the  witness  about  a 
Supreme  Court  decision. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Are  you  through  consulting  now  with  your  counsel 
and  counsel  with  the  witness?     If  you  are,  I  will  proceed. 

Mr.  Claiborne.  I  am  waiting  for  you  to  continue,  sir. 

Mr.  Doyle.  I  think  it  is  important  to  listen.  If  this  was  a  court, 
you  would  be  in  contempt  of  court. 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         071 

The  opinion,  written  by  Judge  Bastian  for  a  unanimous  Court,  convincingly 
states  the  reasons  for  not  unduly  restricting  the  operations  of  Congressional 
Committees.  Also  the  Court  after  reviewing  the  history  of  the  Committee  on 
Un-American  Activities  of  the  House  of  Representatives  concluded  that  there 
is  abundant  reason  to  sustain  its  inquiries  into  Communist  infdtration. 

The  Court  stated — 

And  this  is  a  quotation  from  the  decision  of  the  United  KStates 
Supreme  Court  as  listed  here  by  the  American  Bar  Association — 

"Appellant  next  contends  that  the  primary  purpose  of  the  subconuaittee's 
inquiry  was  to  'expose'  his  beliefs  and  associatiims  and  that,  therefore,  the 
subcommittee  exceeded  the  bounds  of  its  investigative  power.  There  can  be 
no  doubt  that  Congress  has  the  power  of  inquiry  and  investi.uation  when  the 
inquiry  or  investigation  is  upon  a  subject  concerning  which  Congress  may 
legislate.     The  very  resolution — 

and  I  want  to  interpoLate  here  the  resohition  the  Supreme  Court 
refers  to  is  Public  Law  601. 

"The  very  resolution  establishing  the  committee  indicates  that  the  subject  under 
inquiry  was  one  concerning  which  Congi-ess  could  legislate.  The  fact  that  such 
an  inquiry  or  investigation  may  reveal  or  'expose'  some  facts  embarrassing  to 
someone  is  incidental  and  without  effect  upon  the  validity  of  the  inquiry. 

"Evidence  was  presented  at  the  trial  to  show  that  the  House  Committee  on 
Un-American  Activities  had  been  engaged  in  a  continuing  investigation  into 
Communist  methods  of  infiltration  *  *  *." 

The  thing  we  are  doing  here,  Mr.  Chairman — and  I  want  to  call  the 
attention  of  the  record  to  this  point — is  that  we  are  continuing  our 
investigation  as  to  the  extent  to  which  identified  Communists  in  and 
about  Xew  York  have  infiltrated  the  ^Metropolitan  School  of  Music 
or  other  music  activities  which  we  particularly  inquire  into.  We  are 
not  inquiring  as  to  music.  Individually,  I  consider  music  is  the 
universal  language.  But  we  are  continuing  our  investigation  into  the 
extent  to  which  Communists  who  have  been  identified  have  infiltrated 
much  or  little  into  the  field  of  music  as  related  particularly,  today 
and  in  the  next  few  days,  to  the  Metropolitan  School  of  Musi*. 

I  want  the  record  to  sliow  that  Supreme  Court  decision. 

Mr.  Claiborne.  Mr.  Doyle,  if  I  may  comment  on  that 

jNIr.  INIouLDER.  jNIay  I  say  that  the  members  of  the  committee  may 
wish  to  ask  other  questions.  I  think  that  what  Congressman  Doyle 
lias  stated  for  the  record  is  a  very  valuable  addition  to  the  record, 
but  I  see  no  point  in  addressing  it  to  the  witness  for  the  purpose  of 
arguing  about  decisions  of  the  court.  You  are  before  us  to  give  us 
facts  and  information  you  may  have,  and  not  to  discuss  the  decision  of 
tlie  Court  or  an^'tliing  to  do  with  the  Court. 

Mr.  McIntosh.  Mr.  Claiborne,  you  have  refused  to  answer  a  num- 
ber of  questions.  Referring  back  to  your  original  statement  in  answer 
to  the  first  question,  that  statement  included  the  grounds  of  self- 
incrimination,  did  it? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  It  included  the  fact  tliat  I  could  not  expect  to  be 
convicted,  but  I  could  not  take  the  chance  of  being  indicted  because 
it  is  too  expensive. 

Mr.  McIntosii.  Specifically,  were  you,  in  refusing  to  answei-  these 
(juestions,  invoking  the  privilege  extended  to  you  under  tlie  fifth 
amendment  of  the  Constitution? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  Yes ;  I  think  so. 

]\Ir.  McIntosii.  To  all  of  these  questions  that  you  have  refused  to 
answer,  among  all  the  other  grounds,  you  are  invoking  the  fifth  amend- 
ment, are  you  not? 


672         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

Mr.  Claiborne.  I  prefer  my  own  wording. 

Mr.  McIntosh.  You  are  assigning  as  a  reason  the  ground  of  self- 
incrimination  under  the  fifth  amendment,  are  you  not? 

Mr.  Claiborne.  So  long  as  it  is  clearly  understood  that  I  do  not 
concede  myself  to  be  guilty  of  any  crime. 

Mr.  JNIcIntosh.  I  am  not  belaboring  the  question,  but  I  want  to  find 
out  whether  you  are  invoking  the  fifth  amendment  or  are  not. 

Mr.  Claiborne.  Yes. 

Mr.  BouDiN.  May  I  say  that  that  was  a  quotation  from  the  court  of 
appeals.  I  don't  want  Congressman  Doyle  to  refer  to  it  as  a  Supreme 
Court  decision. 

Mr.  Claiborne.  Mr.  Moulder,  I  did  not  want  to  refer  to  that  at  all. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Are  there  any  other  questions  of  the  witness?  If  not, 
the  witness  is  excused. 

Call  your  next  witness,  Mr.  Arens. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Sidney  Finkelstein,  kindly  come  forward. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  that  you 
are  about  to  give  will  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and  nothing  but 
the  truth,  so  help  you  God? 

Mr.  Finkelstein.  I  do. 

TESTIMONY  OF  SIDNEY  FINKELSTEIN,  ACCOMPANIED  BY  COUNSEL, 

MILDRED  ROTH 

Mr.  Arens.  Kindly  identify  yourself  by  name,  residence,  and  occu- 
pation, 

Mr,  Finkelstein.  Sidney  Finkelstein,  522  Stratford  Road,  Brook- 
lyn ;  occupation,  author  and  writer, 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  appearing  today  in  response  to  a  subpena  which 
was  served  upon  you  bj^  the  House  Committee  on  Un-American  Activ- 
ities? 

Mr.  Finkelstein.  I  am. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  represented  by  counsel  ? 

Mr.  Finkelstein.  I  am. 

Mr.  Arens.  Counsel,  kindly  identify  yourself. 

Miss  Roth.  Mildred  Roth,'^401  Broadway,  New  York  City. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Finkelstein,  are  you  a  member  of  the  board  of  di- 
rectors of  the  Metropolitan  Music  School  ? 

Mr.  Finkelstein.  I  am  a  member;  yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  how  long  have  you  occupied  that  post  ? 

Mr.  Finkelstein.  I  believe  my  recollection  is  a  little  cloudy.  I 
believe  it  is  about  a  year  and  a  half.  I  think  it  started  in  the  fall  of 
1955, 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  also  teach  at  the  Metropolitan  Music  School  ? 

Mr.  Finkelstein.  No  ;  I  don't. 

Mr,  Arens,  Have  you  ever  taught  at  the  Metropolitan  Music 
School? 

Mr,  Finkelstein.  Yes ;  I  have  taught  there. 

Mr,  Arens.  You  taught  what  subject? 

Mr.  Finkelstein.  Music  appreciation. 

My.  Arens,  Over  what  period  of  time  did  you  teach  at  the  Metro- 
politan Music  School? 

Mr,  Finkelstein.  There,  again,  my  recollection  is  a  little  cloudy. 
1  think  it  started  in  1953. 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         673 

Mr.  Arens.  And  when  did  it  terminate  ? 

]\Ir.  P"ixKf:LSTEix.  It  terminated  in  January  of  1957,  of  this  year. 

Mr.  Arens.  "Where  are  you  presently  employed  ? 

Mr.  Fixki:lsteix.  I  am  self-employed.  I  am  an  author  and  writer 
of  books  and  so  on,  and  I  sell  my  writin<2:s  or  write  books  and  collect 
royalties. 

"Mr.  Akens.  What  is  the  nature  of  your  writings  ^  What  type  of 
nuiterial  do  you  compose  ? 

Mr.  Fixkelsteix.  They  deal  with  the  arts.  Mostly  about  nmsic, 
but  a  good  deal  about  history  of  fine  arts,  literature,  and  so  on. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Where  else  have  you  taught  besides  at  the  Metropolitan 
Music  School  ? 

(Representative  Moulder  left  the  hearing  room.) 

Mr.  Fixkelstein^.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  tlie  basis  of 
,),y — well,  I  decline  for  three  reasons:  One  is  that,  ol)serving  the  pvn- 
ce'edings  up  to  now,  I  believe  that  these  proceedings  are  an  attempt  to 
smear  "a  school  without  the  slightest  interest  in  what  that  school  is 
teaching  or  doing.  I  think  this  is  an  un-American  ])rocedure,  espe- 
cially as  it  refers  to  a  school.  I  think  it  is  an  interference  with  the 
search  for  truth,  it  intimidates  the  search  of  truth,  which  is  essential 
to  the  operation  of  a  school.  So,  on  principle,  I  would  not  want  to 
cooperate  with  such  a  procedure.  My  second  reason  is  the  fact  that  I 
think  that  this  committee's  operations  are  an  invasion  of  the  right  of 
free  speech  guaranteed  in'  the  first  amendment  to  the  Constitution, 
where  Congress  is  prohibited  to  legislate.  My  third  reason  is  my 
rights  not  to  be  a  witness  against  myself  as  guaranteed  by  the  fifth 
amendment  to  the  Constitution. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  am  interested  in  that  phrase  you  used  about  the  search 
for  truth.  I  want  to  lay  before  you  a  couple  of  exhibits  now  and  see  if 
you  can  help  us  in  our  search  for  truth.  Here  is  a  thermofax  repro- 
duction of  a  bulletin  of  the  Jefferson  School  of  Social  Science,  in 
which  we  see  "Marxism  and  Culture,"  one  of  the  courses  there  being 
taught  by  Sidney  Finkelstein,  and  underneath  the  announcement  of 
the  course  the  following : 

The  role  of  culture  in  the  class  struggle  today.  How  the  great  art  of  the  past 
reflected  and  reacted  upon  society.  How  art  today  is  related  to  the  basic  con- 
flicts of  our  time.  Socialist  realism  ms  tlie  cidtural  expression  of  the  working 
class  versus  abstractionism,  formalism,  subjectivism,  and  other  decadent  expres- 
sions of  imperialism.  A  critical  examination  of  the  cultural  scene  in  the 
U.  S.  and  the  main  tasks  of  the  labor-progre.ssive  movement. 

Would  you  kindly  look  at  this  exhibit  as  it  is  laid  before  you,  Mr. 
Finkelstein,  and  tell  us,  first  of  all,  whether  you  are  truthfully  and 
accurately  identified  there  as  the  instructor  in  culture  and  art  for 
the  working  classes. 

(Document  handed  to  witness.) 

(Witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  accurately  and  truthfully  described  in  that 
exhibit  that  you  have  in  your  hand  as  an  instructor  at  the  Jeft'erson 
School  of  Social  Science,  an  instructor  in  art  and  culture? 

Mr.  Fixkelsteix".  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  the  basis 
of  my  rights  under  the  fifth  amendment  not  to  be  a  witness  against 
myself. 

(Document  marked  ''Finkelstein  Exhibit  No.  1,""  and  retained  in 
connnittee  files.) 


674         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

Mr.  Ahkns.  Now,  I  Avuiit  to  display  to  you,  if  you  please,  sir,  a 
thcrinofax  reproduction  of  the  Coniniunist  Daily  Worker  of  Jan- 
uary IT),  1956,  iJa^re  T,  in  which  an  article  appears  by  yourself,  Sidney 
Finkelstein.  In  the  article  you  say,  "the  search  for  truth  has  become 
a  force  helpino;  shape  world  history,"'  and  you  speak  of  science  and 
scholarship  beino^  placed  at  the  disposal  of  the  working  class  in  shaping 
the  future  and  the  like.  Kindly  look  at  that  article  and  tell  this  com- 
mittee, while  you  are  under  oath,  whether  or  not  you  are  accurately 
described  there  as  the  author  of  that  article. 

(Document  handed  to  witness.) 

(Witness  conferred  with  his  coiinsel.) 

]\Ir.  FiNKELsTEix.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  under  the 
grounds  I  have  given  b'?fore.  1  could  add,  since  you  have  mentioned 
"search  for  truth,"  I  will  be  very  glad  to  discuss  all  the  problems 
and  questions  raised  here  in  the  dee])est  and  most  honest  way  under 
circumstances  which  permit  a  threshing  out  of 

Mr.  Kearxey.  Mr.  Chairman,  T  think  the  witness  should  be  directed 
to  answer  the  question. 

Mr.  Doyle  (presiding).  The  witness  is  directed  to  answer  the 
question. 

Mr.  FiNKELSTEix.  I  decUue  to  answer  that  question  on  the  basis 
of  my  rights  guaranteed  by  the  fifth  amendment  to  the  Constitution. 

(Document  marked  "Finkelstein  Exhibit  No.  2,''  and  retained  in 
committee  files.) 

INIr.  Arexs.  In  view  of  your  dedication  to  the  truth,  would  you 
kindly  tell  us  truthfully,  are  you  now  a  member  of  the  conspiratorial 
apparatus  known  as  tlie  Communist  Party? 

Mr.  FixKELSTETX.  First,  I  would  like  to  respectfully  ask  that  it 
would  save  a  little  confusion  in  my  mind  if  the  counsel  would  separate 
fnctual  names  of  things  from  adjectives  which  he  applies  to  them. 

All 

Mr.  Arexs.  What  adjective  would  you  like  to  have  disassociated 
from  the  noun  "party*'  or  ''Communist  Party" ?  What  adjective  in  my 
question  would  you  like  to  have  disassociated  there? 

Mr.  FixKELSTEix.  I  would  like  to  have  anything  mentioned  by  its 
proper  name;  and  if  the  counsel  adds  an  adjective  which  is  not  part 
of  its  name,  I  would  like  to  have  it  so  indicated. 

Mr.  Arexs.  What  |)art  of  this  description  of  the  Conmiunist  Party 
is  it  you  take  issue  with  ? 

Mr.  FixKELSTEix.  I  am  not  taking  any  issue  with  it  at  all.  I  do 
know  there  is  a  ])arty  called  the  Communist  Party. 

Mr.  Arexs.  How  do  you  know  that  f 

Mr.  Ftnkeesteix.  1  have  heard  of  it. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Is  that  the  sole  source  of  your  knowledge '( 

Mr.  FixKELSTEix.  I  decline  to  answer  tliat  question  on  the  basis  of 
my  rights  under  the  fifth  amendment  of  the  Constitution. 

Mr.  Arexs.  The  fact  is  you  are  now  the  cultural  spokesman  for  the 
Communist  conspiracy  in  the  Ignited  States,  is  it  not;  and  if  it  isn't, 
deny  it  while  you  are  under  oath. 

Mr.  FiNKELSTEix.  I  clou't  kuow  of  any  organization  called  Com- 
munist conspiracy. 

Mr.  Arexs.  MV.  Chairnum,  T  respectfully  suggest  that  the  witness 
be  ordei-ed  and  directed  to  answer  that  question  or,  if  he  chooses,  to 
invoke  his  riehts  under  the  fifth  amendment. 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         675 

Miss  Roth.  May  we  have  the  question  repeated  ? 

Mr.  Arexs.  Mr.  IJeporter,  will  you  please  repeat  the  question? 

Mr.  Doyle.  Read  the  question,  Mr.  Reporter. 

(The  reporter  read  from  his  notes  as  re<}uested.) 

Mr.  FixKELSTEix.  1  decline  to  answer  that  question  under  my 
rights  as  guaranteed  by  the  fifth  amendment. 

^Ir.  Keakxev.  If  you  were  not  the  cultural  spokesman  for  the 
Connnunist  Part}'  in  the  I'nited  States,  would  you  so  state? 

Mr.  Fixkelsteix.  I  would  like  to  respectfully  say,  aud  I  think  I 
am 

Mr.  Kearx^ey.  I  would  like  to  respectfully  ask  you  to  answer  the 
question. 

]Mr.  Fixkelsteix.  I  object  to  any  inferences  that  might  be 
drawn 

Mr.  Kearxey.  I  asked  you  a  very  simple  (juestion.  Mr.  Chairman, 
I  insist  upon  an  answer. 

Mr.  Doyle.  We  are  not  dealing  with  inferences.  We  are  asking 
you  about  a  question  of  fact.  We  are  not  asking  you  about  an  infer- 
ence. 

Mr.  Fixkelsteix.  Could  I  hear  the  question  again  ? 

]Mr.  Kearxey.  It  is  a  very  simple  question.  I  asked  if  you  were 
not  the  cultural  representative  of  the  Communist  Party  in  the  United 
States,  would  you  so  state  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Fixkelsteix.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  for  two  rea- 
sons :  The  first  reason  is  that  to  answer  any  definitive  statement  such 
as  you  asked  would  put  me  in  the  role  of  an  informer,  which  I  find 
repugnant  and  which  I  think  the  great  part  of  the  American  people 
will  find  repugnant. 

Mr.  Kearxey.  I  want  to  say  to  the  witness 

Mr.  Fixkelsteix".  My  second  reason  is  my  rights  guaranteed  under 
the  fifth  amendment  of  the  Constitution. 

Mr.  Kearx'ey.  I  want  to  say  to  the  witness  that,  in  the  years  I  have 
been  on  this  committee,  the  statements  tlnit  you  have  just  made  have  a 
familiar  ring.    It  is  an  old,  old  party  answer. 

]Mr.  Doyle.  May  I  ask  a  question.  Ms'.y  I  ask  the  witness  this  ques- 
tion :  Are  you  a  native-born  American  ? 

Mr.  Fix^KELSTEix.  Yes,  I  am. 
Mr.  Doyle.  What  State? 

Mr.  Fixkelsteix.  New  York  State. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Thank  you. 

Mr.  Arex^s.  Now^  I  display  to  you  a  photostatic  reproduction  of  the 
Daily  Worker,  October  14,  1040.  in  which  a  letter  appears,  to  the  edi- 
tor, "Answering  Attack  on  ]V[arxism Xew  York  City."    I  should 

like  to  read  at  least  excerpts  from  it : 

Editor,  Daily  Worker :  I  wonder  how  many  readers  have  realized  the  full 
implications  of  the  fact  that  a  central  part  of  the  assault  upon  the  12  Com- 
munist Party  leaders  is  the  attempt  to  abolish  from  men's  knowledge  the  writings 
of  Marx,  Engels,  Lenin,  Stalin  and  of  the  working-class  leaders  who  have  learned 
from  them. 

It  is,  of  course,  as  impossible  to  abolish  these  writings  as  it  is  to  abolish  the 
history  of  humanity  itself,  which  they  describe  so  profoundly  and  of  which  they 
are  a  part,  or  to  abolish  the  very  realities  of  life  upon  which  these  writings  throw 
so  clear  a  light. 

The  point  I  want  to  make  here  is  that  one  of  the  effective  and  important  ways 
in  which  the  Worker  readers  and  their  friends  can  show  their  indignation  at 


676         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

the  above-mentioned  assaults,  is  to  register  this  week  at  the  Jefferson  School  of 
Social  Science,  at  Sixth  Avenue  and  16th  Street,  a  school  proudly  dedicated  to 
the  mastery  and  use  of  the  above  science.  An  overwhelming  registration  NOW 
will  show  that  the  people  know  the  worth  of  these  profound  teachings,  their  truth 
and  importance,  and  demand  that  the  purveyors  of  ignorance  take  their  hands 
oflP. 

There  is  not  a  walk  of  life  or  field  of  knowledge  and  culture  upon  which  some 
course  in  the  Jefferson  School  does  not  throw  a  new  light — 

and  so  forth.     Signed  by  Sidney  Finkelstein. 

Kindly  look  at  that  document,  if  you  please,  sir,  while  yon  are  nnder 
oath,  ancl  expound  to  this  committee  first  of  all  if  you  are  accurately 
described  there  as  author  of  that  letter  and,  secondly,  tell  us  a  little 
bit  about  this  profound  truth  that  you  are  defending  in  the  Marxist 
terminology. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Finkelstein.  With  all  respect,  I  am  not  trying  to  quibble,  I 
liear  two  questions. 

Mr.  Arens.  We  will  take  them  one  by  one.  I  don't  mean  to  confuse 
you.  First  of  all,  kindly  help  this  committee  in  undertaking  to  de- 
velop facts  to  protect  this  great  Nation  against  the  conspiratorial 
apparatus,  and  kindly  tell  us  are  you  the  author,  the  Sidney  Finkel- 
stein identified  in  the  Communist  Daily  AVorker. 

Mr.  Finkelstein.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  under  the 
grounds  guaranteed,  or  the  rights  guaranteed,  by  the  fifth  amendment 
to  the  Constitution. 

(Document  marked  "Finkelstein  Exhibit  No.  3,"  and  retained  in 
committee  files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  been  one  of  the  contributing  editors  to  the 
Communist  publication  Masses  and  Mainstream? 

Mr.  Finkelstein.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  for  the  same 
reason. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  have  you  been  one  of  the  sponsors  of  the  Civil 
Eights  Congress  call  to  defeat  the  efforts  of  the  FBI  and  the  House 
Committee  on  Un-American  Activities  and  others  to  expose  commu- 
nism^ I  invite  your  attention  specifically  to  this  language  in  an 
exhibit  I  will  show  you  in  a  moment: 

The  FBI  has  its  paid  informers  everywhere,  and  almost  any  lodge,  church, 
political  meeting  or  labor  organizatit)n  may  be  victimized  by  these  peeping 
toms. 

Business  enterprises,  as  well  as  private  citizens  and  pul)lic  officials  are  hailed 
before  the  House  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities  and  found  guilty  by  asso- 
ciation, or  alleged  association — 

and  the  like. 

Kindly  look  at  this  document  as  it  is  displayed  to  you  and  tell 
us  whether  or  not  you  are  accurately  identified  in  your  status  there 
as  one  of  the  leaders  of  that  enterprise. 

(Document  handed  to  witness.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Couldn't  you  help  us  on  that,  please,  Mr.  Finkelstein? 

Mr.  Finkelstein.  I  am  trying  to  see  my 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Finkelstein.  I  see  a  name  like  mine  on  that  list  as  a  sponsor. 
I  don't  see  this  as  sponsored  by  the  Civil  Rights  Congress.  It  is  a 
Call  to  a  Bill  of  Rights  Conference.  I  am  a  little  cloudy  about  all 
of  the  details  of  this,  but  I  believe  I  am  the  person  who  sponsored 
this,  who  was  one  of  the  long  list  of  sponsors.     From  glancing  over 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         677 

this  entire  docuiiieiit — which  ^roes  much  beyond,  1  may  say,  the  rather 
one-sided  excerpt  you  read — I  am  in  agreement  witli  what  seems  to 
be  its  main  purpose. 

(Document  marked  "P^inkelstein  Exhi})it  No.  4,"  and  i-etained  in 
connnittee  files, ) 

Mr.  Arens.  Your  public  service  has  extended  beyond  the  shores 
of  this  Xation,  has  it  not  ^  I  have  here  a  photostatic  re])roducti()n  of 
a  document  quoting  from  the  Connnunist  Daily  Worker  of  April  7, 
1948  (p.  18),  in  which  a  numher  of  people,  including  Sidney  Finkel- 
stein,  protest  the  jailing  of  a  world-famous  poet  who  hap})ens  to  be 
one  of  the  leading  Connnunists  in  Chile.  Look  at  that  document 
and  see  if  you  can  help  us.  Tell  us  first  of  all  whether  or  not  you  lent 
your  name  to  that. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  FixKELSTEix.  Sir,  on  this  I  have  no  independent  recollection 
of  this  particular  document,  but  I  do  know  of  Pablo  Neruda  as  a 
very  great  poet. 

(Document  marked  "Finkelstein  Exhibit  Xo.  o,"  and  retained  in 
committee  fiiles.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  he  is  a  Connnunist  ^ 

Mr.  FiNKELSTEix.  That  is  a  question.  I  don't  know  iiis  i)olitics. 
He  is  a  very  great  poet. 

Mr.  Kearney.  Do  you  call  the  Connnunist  Party  a  i)olitical  party? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  P^inkelstein.  Congressman,  if  you  are  asking  my  opinion,  in 
my  opinion  the  Conmumist  Party  is  a  political  party  which  has 
o})erated  as  such. 

Mr.  Kearney.  You  have  not  read,  evidently,  some  of  the  writings 
of  Mr.  Foster,  the  head  of  the  Connnunist  Party  in  this  country, 
have  you  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Miss  KoTii.  Is  that  a  question,  sir,  to  the  witness  ( 

Mr.  Kearney.  1  said  evidently  the  witness  has  not  read  some  of  the 
writings  of  Mr.  Foster,  the  head  of  the  Connnunist  Party  in  this 
country. 

Mr.  Finkelstein.  I  am  a  little  confused,  sir.  Do  you  want  me  to 
answer  that  ? 

Mr.  Kearney.  That  is  what  I  asked  you. 

Miss  Roth.  Is  that  a  question  of  the  witness,  sir  ? 

Mr.  Finkelstein.  He  said  it  is. 

Miss  RoTii.  Are  you  asking  the  witness  whether  he  did  read  them? 
I  don't  understand  the  Congressman's  statement. 

Mr.  Kearney.  That  is  what  I  am  asking  him. 

Miss  Roth.  All  right. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Finkelstein.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question,  sir. 

Mr.  Kearney.  I  ex])ected  that  answer. 

Mr.  Finkelstein.  And  under  the  grounds  of  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman.  I  respectfully  suggest  that  will  conclude 
the  staff  interrogation  of  this  witness. 

Mr.  Kearney.  There  is  one  question  1  would  like  to  ask.  I  have 
listened  to  this  witness  and  several  others  here  this  afternoon,  espe- 
cially this  one,  in  his  desire  of  search  for  the  truth,  and  his  participa- 


678  COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

tion  in  many  niovomonts  over  the  past  few  yeiu-s.  I  wonld  like  to  ask 
the  witness  this  qnestion:  Have  you  protested  pul)licly  tlie  massacre 
of  the  Hunoivrian  i)eople  in  tlie  past  few  months? 

(Tlie  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  FiNKELSTEiN.  With  all  respect,  Congressman 

Mr.  Kearney.  Just  ]dease  answer  the  question. 

Mr.  FiNKEi.s'raiN.  lender  the  circumstances — I  give  my  honest 
opinion  on  every  country  under  the  sun,  such  as  I  have.  TTnder  the 
circumstances  of  this  hearing,  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  the 
grounds  I  have  given  before  for  declining  to  answer  questions. 

Mr.  Kearney.  I  would  suggest  that  you  continue  your  search  for 
the  truth,  but  along  the  right  direction. 

Mr.  FiNKELSTEiN.  I  ahvays  have,  and  as  a  writer  my  writings  would 
be  worthless  unless  that  was  its  main  objective. 

Mr.  Kearney.  That  is  all,  Mr.  (^hairnum. 

Mr.  McIntosh.  I  have  no  questions. 

Mr.  Frazier.  I  have  no  questions. 

Mr.  Doyle.  I  have  a  question:  IIow  in  the  world  could  whether 
or  not  you  ]>rotested  the  slaughter  of  the  Hungarians  by  the  Soviet 
Communist  Party  agents  in  Hungary,  incriminate  you  in  the  United 
States  ? 

Mr.  Finkelstejn.  Well,  it  opens  np  a  door  to  my  being  questioned 
on  my  feelings  and  actions  in  regard  to  several  other  countries  and 
the  opinions  of  various  groups  about  these  countries  and  actions.  So 
it  is  under  that  ground  that  I  gave  the  answer  I  did. 

]Mr.  Doyle.  I  understand,  yes.  Well,  I  gave  you  an  open  door  to 
show  without  going  into  iuiything  else  whether  or  not  you  had  the 
gu  s  and  the  patriotism  to  ])r()test  the  murder  of  those  Hungarians 
and  you  do  not  take  it.  I  understand  your  attitude.  Here  is  your 
attitude.  I  read  here  in  this  exhibit,  and  you  said  that  is  the  way 
you  felt  today,  the  attack  you  make  on  the  FBI  in  1949.  A  few 
minutes  ago  you  said  you  felt  the  same  today  : 

The  F-<I  has  its  paid  informers  everywhere,  and  almost  any  lodge,  churt'h, 
political  meeting,  or  labor  organization  nuiy  l)e  victimized  by  these  peeping  toms. 

That  is  the  way  you  feel.  Where  in  God's  name  would  our  Nation 
be  if  the  FBI  wasn't  able  to  get  patriotic  American  citizens  to  go  into 
these  organizations  in  which  Connnies,  crooks,  cheats,  and  traitors 
infiltrate  ?  Would  you  tell  me  where  our  Nation  would  land  if  we  did 
not  have  the  FBI?  And  with  subversives,  some  of  wdiich  you  know 
something  about,  I  assinne  from  your  testimony. 

Mr.  FiNKELSTEiN.  The  Nation  might  be  reduced  to  the  terrible  pro- 
cedure of  having  to  jail  people  for  crimes,  only  if  it  found  that  they 
actually  committed  them  or  found  that  they  did  something  criminal, 
not  just  thinking. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Keep  on  talking  and  give  me  some  more  of  your  philos- 
ophy, please.  I  am  trying  to  open  up  another  door  to  you,  so  that 
you  can  show  how  you  feel  about  this  country  and  about  its  internal 
security.  That  is  one  reason  I  am  asking  this  question.  Go  ahead 
giving  us  your  philosophy,  attacking  the  FBI  and  our  internal-secu- 
rity agents.  Go  ahead.  1  understand  how  you  feel.  If  it  wasn't  for 
the  FBI,  it  wouldn't  take  the  subversives  in  the  Communist  Party 
and  other  subversives  and  traitors  long  to  take  over  the  internal  secu- 
rity of  our  Nation,  and  you  know  it.    That  is  one  reason  you  holler 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         079 

against  them.  You  ought  to  be  ashamed  of  yourself  for  attacking 
theFlU. 

Mr.  FiNKELSTEiN.  Congressman,  you  are  selecting  one  little  sen- 
tence. 

Mr.  Doyle.  That  is  all  riglit.    You  signed  it. 

Mr.  FiNKELSTEix.  It  is  from  a  statement  which 

jMr.  Doyle.  You  signed  it.  Now,  I  have  one  thing  more.  Counsel 
asked  you  about  the  Jefferson  School  of  Social  Science,  right  here  in 
New  York.  You  didn't  take  time  to  bring  out  the  rating  of  this 
Jefferson  School  of  Social  Science  to  which  you  pleaded  your  con- 
stitutional privilege.  Here  is  what  the  Guide  to  Subversive  Organi- 
zations and  Publications,  publislied  as  of  January  2,  1957,  has  to  say 
about  it,  about  this  school.    I  read  on  page  49  : 

1.  Cited  as  an  "adjunct  to  the  Communist  Party."  *  *  * 

2.  "At  the  beginning  of  the  present  year,  the  old  Communist  Party  Workers 
School  and  the  School  for  Democracy  were  merged  into  the  Jefferson  School  of 
Social  Science."  *  *  * 

3.  "Schools  under  patriotic  and  benevolent  titles  indoctrinate  Communists 
and  outsidei'S  in  the  theory  and  practice  of  comiiiunism,  train  organizers  and 
oi'cratives,  recruit  new  party  members  and  synipath  zers.  *  *  *.  S(  hools  of 
this  type  have  been  *  *  *  Jefferson  School  of  Social  Science,  New  York.  *  *  *" 
Internal  Security  Subcommittee  of  the  Senate  Judiciary  Committee.  *  *  * 

That  is  one  reason  that  the  FBI  has  to  pay  informers  to  get  in 
behind  these  dark  doors  where  subversives  train  people  to  advocate 
changing  our  form  of  government  to  a  totalitarian  form  of  govern- 
ment, as  is  in  effect  in  Soviet  Russia.  You  ought  to  be  ashamed  of 
yourself. 

INIr.  Moulder.  Are  tliere  any  additional  questions? 

Mr.  McIntosh.  I  have  no  questions. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  cannot  si)eak  too  strongly  against  these 
American-born  citizens  who  get  the  blessings  of  our  representative 
form  of  government  and  get  prosperity  here  by  traiiiing  in  our  schools 
arid  colleges,  and  receive  the  opportunities  we  have,  and  then  come  out 
and  condenm  the  Fl^,  tlie  one  great  agency  that  is  best  able  to  protect 
our  internal  security  against  subversives  ar.d  trait'trs,  crooks,  thieves, 
and  bank  robbers. 

Mr.  Kearney.  I  tliink.  Mr.  Chairman,  if  the  gentlemiin  from  Cali- 
foi-nia  will  yield,  let's  not  have  ihe  FBI  take  all  the  credit.  I  think 
the  witness  criticized  this  connnittee,  too. 

Mr.  MoT'LDER.  Are  there  any  additional  questions? 

Mr.  Doyle.  1  wish  we  could  get  further  after  men  who  do  this  sort 
of  thing  subversively. 

Mr.  AIoulder.  The  witness  is  excused. 

I  Avish  to  make  this  explanation:  When  1  was  referring  to  the 
decision  which  was  read  by  our  distinguished  colleague  from  Cali- 
fornia, 1  was  really  explaining  to  the  witness  that  it  was  not  being 
projxjunded  in  the  nature  of  a  question  but  as  an  exjdanation  which 
(lid  not  recjuire  an  answer  frcjui  hiuL  I  think  it  was  a  valuable  con- 
tril)ution  as  far  as  law  is  concerned.  It  was  given  in  explanation  of  a 
comment,  and  it  was  not  a  question.  It  was  not  necessary  to  go  into 
an  argument  with  a  member  of  the  committee  concerning  a  decision 
of  the  court. 

The  subconunittee  will  now  stand  in  ivcess  for  a  period  of  .^  minutes. 


680  COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

(Members  of  tlie  committee  present  at  taking;  of  recess:  Representa- 
tives Monlder,  Kearney,  Mclntosli,  Frazier,  and  Doyle.) 

(Brief  recess.) 

Mr.  MoFLOKR.  The  subcommittee  will  be  in  order, 

(^Members  of  the  committee  present:  Eepresentatives  Moulder, 
Doyle,  Kearney,  and. Mcintosh.) 

Mr.  Moulder.  Call  your  next  witness. 

Mr.  Arexs.  The  next  witness  will  be  Mr.  Henry  Zlotnick,  Mr.  Chair- 
man, (^ome  forward,  Mr.  Zlotnick.  Remain  standing  while  the  chair- 
man administers  an  oath  to  you. 

Mr.  MouLUER.  Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  you  are 
about  to  oive  this  committee  will  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and 
nothini>-  but  the  truth,  so  help  you  (jod^ 

Mr.  Zlotnick.  I  do. 

TESTIMONY  OF  HENRY  ZLOTNICK  (ZLOTNIK).  ACCOMPANIED  BY 
COUNSEL,  HARRY  SACHER 

]Mr.  Arkxs.  Kindly  identify  yourself  by  name,  residence,  and  occu- 
pation. 

Mr.  Zi>()TXi('K.  My  name  is  Henry  Zlotnick.  My  residence  is  9;^2 
Carroll  Street,  Brooklyn.     I  am  a  musician  and  a  flute  teacher. 

Mr.  Arexs.  You  are  appeariufr  today  in  response  to  a  subpena  which 
was  served  ui)on  you  by  the  House  Committee  on  Un-American 
Activities? 

Mr.  Zlotnick.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arexs.  You  are  accompanied  by  counsel  ? 

Mr.  Zlotnick.  Yes. 

jMr.  xVrens.  Counsel,  please  identify  yourself. 

^fr.  Saciier.  I  am  Harry  Sacher,  842  Madison  Avenue,  New  York, 
X.  Y. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Where  are  you  employed? 

Mr,  Zlotnick.  Mostly  self-employed,  and  I  also  teach  for  schools. 

Mr.  Arens.  For  what  schools  ? 

Mr.  Zlotnick.  For  the  Metropolitan  Music  School  and  the  Neigh- 
borhood Music  School. 

Mr.  Arexs.  How  long  have  you  taught  at  the  Metropolitan  Music 
School  ? 

]Mr.  Zlotxick.  1  don't  know  exactly,  but  it  is  probably  in  the 
neighborhood  of  about  1'2  years. 

Mr,  Arens,  How  long  have  you  taught  at  the  Neighborhood  Music 
School  ? 

Mr.  Zlotnick,  About  18  years, 

Mr,  Arens,  What  did  you  teach  ? 

Mr.  Zlotnick.  Flute. 

Mr.  Arens.  What? 

]Mr.  Zlotnick.  Flute. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Are  you  now,  or  have  you  ever  been,  a  member  of  the 
Communist  Party? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Zlotnick.  I  refuse  to  answer  this  question  on  the  basis  of  the 
hfth  amendment  because  I  do  not  wish  to  be  a  witness  against  myself. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  under  Connnunist  Party  discipline? 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         681 

Mr,  Zlotnick.  I  refuse  to  answer  on  the  basis  of  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  respectfully  suggest,  Mr.  Chairman,  that  concludes 
the  staff  interrogation  of  this  witness. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Are  there  any  questions? 

Mr.  Doyle.  No  questions. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Congressman  Kearney  ? 

Mr.  Kearney.  No  questions. 

Mr.  McIntosh.  No  questions,  Mr.  Chairman. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  "Walter  Raim,  will  you  kindly  come  forward? 

Mr.  Moulder.  Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  you  are 
about  to  give  this  committee  will  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and 
nothing  but  the  truth  ? 

Mv.    Raim.  I  do. 

TESTIMONY    OF    WALTER    RAIM    (WALTER    YUDOMIN),    ACCOM- 
PANIED BY  COUNSEL,  HARRY  SACHER 

Mr.  Arens.  Kindly  identify  yourself,  please. 

Mr.  Raim.  Walter  Raim,  t2130  Mulner  avenue,  student  and  music 
teacher. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  appearing  today  in  response  to  a  subpena 
which  was  served  upon  you  by  the  House  Committee  on  Un-American 
Activities  ? 

Mr.  Raim.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  represented  by  counsel  ? 

Mr.  Raim.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  Counsel,  identify  yourself,  please. 

Mr.  Sacher.  My  name  is  Harry  Sacher,  342  Madison  Avenue, 
New  York,  N.  Y. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  are  you  employed,  Mr,  Raim  ? 

Mr.  Raim,  I  teach  at  the  Metropolitan  Music  School, 

Mr.  Arens.  Plow  long  have  you  taught  there  ? 

Mr.  Raim.  Since  September  1956. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  do  you  teach  ? 

Mr.  Raim.  Guitar  ancl  banjo. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  teach  any  place  else  ? 

Mr.  Raim.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  else  do  you  teach  ? 

Mr.  Raim.  Neighborhood  Music  School. 

Mr.  Arens.  How  long  have  you  tauglit  at  the  Neighborhood  Music 
School? 

Mr.  Raim.  For  2  years. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  used  any  name  other  than  the  name  of 
Walter  Raim,  pursuant  to  which  you  were  subpenaed  here? 

Mr.  Raim.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  other  name? 

Mr.  Raim.  Yudomin. 

Mr.  Arens.  Y-u-d-o-m-i-n? 

Mr.  Raim.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  had  your  name  legally  changed  to  Raim? 

Mr.  Raim.  Yes,  sir;  as  of  this  date. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  and  when  were  vou  born  ? 

Mr.  Raim.  In  the  Bronx,  193.5. 

91198— 57— pt.  1 6 


6S2  COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

Mr.  Akens.  Are  3^011  now,  or  have  you  ever  been,  a  member  of  the 
Communist  Party? 

Mr.  Ratm.  I  respectfully  decline  to  answer  that  question  sir,  on 
grounds  granted  me  by  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Ml".  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  concludes 
the  staif  interrogation  of  this  witness. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Have  you  any  questions,  ]Mr.  Doyle? 

Mr.  Doyle.  Mr.  Chairnum,!  have  no  questions  but  may  I  say  this: 
Young  man,  I  draw  no  inferences.  But  if  you  are,  or  if  you  were 
a  member  of  the  Communist  outfit,  get  out  of  that  garbage  and 
build  toward  your  Nation's  strength  instead  of  weakness.  Some 
boys  a  little  bit  older  than  you  gave  their  lives  that  you  might  have  a 
crack  at  continuing  to  live  and  raise  your  family  in  a  strong,  con- 
stitutional, representative  form  of  government.  Take  advantage  of 
it  and  build,  instead  of  weakening. 

Mv.  Moulder.  Are  there  any  other  questions? 

Mr.  Kearxey.  No  questions. 

Mr.  McIntosh.  No  questions. 

Mr.  Arens.  The  next  witness  will  be  Mr.  Max  Pollikoff,  P-o-l-l-i- 
k-o-f-f. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Will  you  be  sworn.  Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  the 
testimony  which  you  are  about  to  give  before  this  subcommittee  will 
be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and  nothing  but  the  truth,  so  help  you 
God? 

Mr.  Pollikoff.  I  do. 

TESTIMONY  OF  MAX  POLLIKOFF,  ACCOMPANIED  BY  COUNSEL, 

EPHRAIM  LONDON 

Mr.  Arexs.  Kindly  identify  yourself  by  name,  residence,  and  occu- 
pation, 

Mr.  Pollikoff.  My  name  is  Max  Pollikoff.  I  live  at  25  West  68th 
Street.    I  am  a  violinist. 

Mr.  Arexs.  You  are  appearing  today  in  response  to  a  subpena 
served  upon  you  by  the  House  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities? 

Mr.  Pollikoff.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arexs.  You  are  represented  by  counsel  ? 

Mr.  Pollikoff.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arex^s.  Will  counsel  kindly  identify  himself? 

Mr.  DoxDox.  I  am  Ephraim  Ijoiulon,  150  Broadway. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Mr.  Pollikoff',  are  you  a  sponsor  of  the  Metropolitan 
Music  School  ? 

Mr.  Pollikoff.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arexs.  How  lono;  have  you  been  a  sponsor  of  the  IVIetropolitan 
Music  School? 

Mr.  Pollikoff.  I  wouldn't  exactly  know  the  date  I  gave  my  name. 

Mr.  Arexs.  What  is  your  best  recollection,  or  your  best  judgment, 
yoiu'  best  approximation? 

Mr.  Pollikoff.  It  would  have  been  about  G  or  7  years  ago. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Have  you  continuously  been  a  sponsor  since  then  ? 

Mr.  Pollikoff.  Yes,  my  name  has  been  on,  yes. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Are  you  now,  or  have  you  e^er  been,  a  member  of  the 
Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Pollikoff.  I  am  not  a  member  of  the  Comuiunist  Party. 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         683 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  now,  or  have  }oii  ever  been,  a  member  of  the 
Commmiist  Party  ? 

Mr.  PoLLiKOFF.  Well,  excuse  me. 

(The  witness  conferred  Avith  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  PoLLiKOFF.  There  seems  to  be  two  questions  there. 

Mr.  Arens.  Let's  tr}^  question  No.  2.  Have  3'OU  ever  been  a  member 
of  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  PoLLiKOFF.  I  decline  to  answer  that  on  tlie  "rounds  of  the  fifth 
amendment. 

Mr.  Arexs.  AVere  you  a  member  of  the  Conununist  Party  1  year 
ao-o  ? 

Mr.  PoLLiKOFF.  Well,  I  would  say  I  w^ould  answer  everything 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

INIr.  PoixiKoFF.  May  I  have  that  (juestion  again  ? 

Mr.  Arexs.  Were  you  a  member  of  the  Communist  T^arty  a  year  ago  'i 

Mr.  PoLLiKOFF.  The  answer  is  "A'o." 

Mr.  Arexs.  Were  you  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  5  years 
ago  ? 

Mr.  PoLLiKOFF.  I  decline  to  answer  that. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Were  you  a  member  of  the  Comnnmist  Party  4  years 
ago? 

Mr.  PoLLiKOFF.  I  would  decline  to  answer  that. 

i\Ir.  Arexs.  Were  you  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  3  years 
ago? 

]\Ir.  PoLLiKOFF.  I  would  decline  to  answer  that. 

Mr.  Arex's.  Were  you  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  2  years 
ago  ^ 

Mr.  PoLLiKOFF.  I  would  decline  to  answer  that. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Did  you  resign  technical  membership  in  the  Communist 
Party  for  the  purpose  of  being  able  to  testify,  or  appear  and  swear, 
that  you  were  not  technically  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  PoLLiKOFF.  I  decline  to  answer  that. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Are  you  under  Conununist  Party  discipline  ? 

Mr.  PoLLiKOFF.  Definitely  not. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Were  you  undei-  Communist  Party  discipline  at  any 
time  during  the  course  of  the  last  year  ? 

Mr.  PoLLiKOFF.  Definitely  not. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Were  you  under  Communist  Party  discipline  at  any 
time  in  the  last  2  years  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  PoLLiKOFF.  I  decline  to  answer  that. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Now,  I  would  like  to  display  to  you,  if  you  please,  sir, 
an  article  ap})earing  in  the  Comnumist  Worker  as  far  back  as  lO-io 
(July  4,  p.  7),  in  which  a  number  of  people  join  in  a  statement, 
according  to  the  headline,  scoring  "anti-Soviet  propaganda,"  including 
one  Max  Pollikofi",  concert  and  radio  violinist.  Please  look  at  that 
document  and  tell  this  conmiittee  whether  or  not  you  have  a  recollec- 
tion of  joining  in  that  enterprise. 

(  Document  handed  to  witness.) 

(Witness  conferred  witli  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  PtJLLiKoFF.  I  will  decline  to  answer  this. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Why? 

Mr.  PoLLiKOFF.  On  the  groimds  it  may  incriminate  me. 


684         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

(Document  marked  "Pollikoil'  Exhibit  No.  1,"  and  retained  in 
committee  files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  are  yon  employed,  in  addition  to  the  connection 
that  you  have  there  with  the  Metropolitan  Music  School  ? 

Mr.  PoLLiKOFF.  You  didn't  ask  me  whether  I  was  connected  with 
the  music  school ;  you  asked  me  if  I  was  a  sponsor. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  are  you  em])loyed  ? 

Mr.  PoLLiKOFF.  I  don't  teach.     Is  that  what  you  mean,  besides 

Mr.  Arens.  I  understand.  You  are  a  sponsor  of  the  Metropolitan 
Music  School.     Where  are  you  employed? 

Mr.  PoLLiKOFF.  I  am  a  free-lance  violinist. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  are  you  ]:)resently  workin<j? 

Mr.  PoLLiKOFF.  I  work  for  everybody.  In  other  words,  everybody 
that  calls.     Concerts  or  radio. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  presently  engaged  in  your  vocation  as  a 
violinist? 

Mr.  PoLLiKOFF.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  are  you  pi-esently  playing  the  violin? 

^J".  PoLLiKOFF.  Today  I  wouldn't  be  playing  anywhere;  or  to- 
morrow I  would  be  playing,  say,  for  a  radio  station  or  a  studio. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  have  a  contract  with  NBC  or  CBS  or  Symphony 
of  the  Air? 

Mr.  PoLLiKOFF.  Not  at  all. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  w^as  the  last  time  you  were  on  radio? 

Mr.  PoLLiKOFF.  Well,  the  last  time  was,  I  guess,  Monday  night. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  did  you  play  Monday  night? 

Mr.  PoLLiKOFF.  That  was  the  Telephone  Hour. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  did  you  play  on  the  Telephone  Hour? 

Mr.  PoLLTKOFF.  Just  as  one  of  the  violinists  of  the  orchestra. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  signed  a  statement,  under  oath,  for 
prospective  employers  respecting  the  subject  of  any  membership  by 
yourself  in  the  Communist  Party? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  POLLIKOFF.    No. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  been  interrogated  on  that  subject? 

Mr.  PoLLIKOFF.   No. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  will  conclude 
the  staff  interrogation  of  this  w^itness. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Congressman  Doyle,  have  you  any  questions? 

Mr.  Doyle.  I  noticed,  Witness,  when  counsel  asked  you  if  you  were 
under  Communist  Party  discipline  at  any  time  within  the  last  year, 
your  reply  was,  "Definitely  not.''     Do  you  remember  so  answering? 

Mr.  PoLLiKOFF.  Yes. 

Mr.  Doyle.  While  I  know  that  a  legal  point  is  we  are  not  sup])09ed 
to  draw  any  inferences  from  your  use  of  the  constitutional  privilege, 
I  w^ant  to  say  to  you  that  I  compliment  you  on  the  fact  that,  apparently, 
you  haven't  been  a  member  of  the  C^onmiunist  Party  at  any  time  dur- 
ing the  last  year.  Whether  or  not  you  were  before  that,  I  don't  know ; 
but  at  any  rate,  you  are  not  now,  and  you  haven't  been  within  the  last 
year.     That  is  true,  isn't  it. 

Mr.  PoLLiKOFF.  That  is  what  I  say. 

Mr.  Doyle.  I  want  to  congratulate  you  on  getting  out  of  it,  or  of 
not  being  in  it,  to  be  fairer  to  you. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Congressman  Kearney,  do  you  have  a  question? 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN  MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         685 

Mr.  Kearney.  No. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Congressman  Mcintosh? 

Mr.  McIntosii.  No  questions,  Mr.  Chairman. 

Mr.  Moulder.  That  is  alL 

Mr.  Arens.  The  next  witness  will  be  Manrine  Holbert. 

Kindly  come  forward. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Do  you  solenndy  swear  that  the  testimony  which  you 
are  about  to  give  before  this  counnittee  will  be  the  truth,  the  whole 
truth,  and  nothing  but  the  truth,  so  help  you  God? 

Miss  Holbert.  I  do. 

TESTIMONY  OF  MAURINE   HOLBERT    (MAURINE  HOLBERT  KEN- 
NEDY), ACCOMPANIED  BY  COUNSEL,  ISIDORE  NEEDLEMAN 

Mr.  Arens.  Kindly  identify  yourself  by  name,  residence,  and  oc- 
cupation. 

Miss  Holbert.  Maurine  Holbert,  51  West  11th  Street,  actress, 
teacher. 

Mr.  xVrens.  You  are  appeai-ing  today,  ma'am,  in  response  to  ^ab- 
j)ena  which  was  served  upon  you  by  the  House  Committee  on  Un- 
American  Activities  ? 

Miss  Holbert.  That  is  true. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  represented  by  counsel  ? 

Miss  Holbert.  That  is  true. 

Mr.  Needleman.  Isidore  Needleman,  165  Broadway,  New  York  6. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  are  you  employed  ? 

Miss  Holbert.  I  am  an  actress,  which  means  free-lancing,  of  course ; 
and  I  also  teach  at  the  ]\Ietropolitan  Music  School. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  course  do  you  teach  there  ? 

Miss  Holbert.  I  teach  creative  dramatics  for  children. 

Mr.  Arens.  How  long  have  you  been  teaching  there '( 

Miss  Holbert.  I  would  say  2  years. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  now,  or  have  you  ever  been,  a  member  of  the 
Communist  Party? 

Miss  Holbert,  I  decline  to  answer  this  question  under  the  fifth 
amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  now  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Miss  Holbert.  I  decline  to  answer  this  question  on  the  fifth  amend- 
ment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  have  you  recently  appeared  in  the  course  of 
your  dranu\tic  performances^  1  understood  you  to  say,  in  addition 
to  being  an  instructor  at  the  Metropolitan  Music  School,  you  are  an 
actress. 

Miss  Holbert.  I  played  in  an  otf-Broadway  theater. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  was  the  name  of  the  presentation  ? 

Miss  Holbert.  I  refuse  to  answer  that  under  the  fifth  amendment 
because  I  loathe  this  conmiittee.  Their  main  purpose  is  to  blacklist 
people,  to  destroy  their  livelihood,  and  to  destroy  and  hurt  every 
institution  whose  name  is  mentioned  in  this  court. 

Mr.  Kearney.  That  is  a  pretty  speech,  but  it  is  not  true. 

Miss  Holbert.  Thank  you. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  respectfully  suggest  that  the  witness  be  ordered  and 
directed  to  answer  the  last  outstanding  question. 

Miss  Holbert.  I  refuse  to  answer  it  on  the  fifth  amendment. 


686         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

Mr.  Moi'LDER.  Have  the  record  sliow  that  prior  to  that  statement 
she  Avas  ordered  and  directed  to  answer. 

Mr.  Akkns.  Have  you  appeared  in  T!\e  Doll  Housed 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  HoLBERT.  Yes;  I  phiyed  in  The  Doll  House. 

Mr.  Arens.  When  did  you  play  in  that  presentation  ? 

Miss  HoLBERT.  Last  spring. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Have  you  phiyed  in  The  ]\Iale  Animal? 

Mill  Holbert.  I  li^ve. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Kindly' tell  us  where  you  played  in  Tlie  Male  Animal? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

INIiss  Holbert.  In  summer  stock. 

]Mr.  Arexs.  Where,  jna'am? 

Miss  Hoebert.  In  Nlintucket. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  did  you  play  in  Joan  of  Lorraine  ? 

Miss  Holbert.  That  is  right,  Joan  of  Lorraine. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Where  did  you  play  that  ? 

ISIiss  Holbert.  In  stock. 

Mr.  Mott.der.  What  do  you  mean  by  that? 

ISIiss  Holbert.  In  summer  stock,  a  sunmier  theater  in  Connecticut- 
Mr.  Arexs.  Can  you  tell  us  what  is  AFTKA  ? 

Miss  Holbert.  Yes.  AFTR  A  is  the  union  that  represents  the  radio 
and  television  performers. 

(Representative  Frazier  entered  the  hearing  room.) 

Mr.  Arexs.  Have  you  been  active,  or  identified,  in  tlie  Harlem 
Unity  Theatre? 

Miss  Holbert.  I  decline  to  answer  this  (piestion  on  the  fifth  amend- 
ment. 

Mr.  Arexs.  I  lay  befor  you,  if  you  please,  a  thermofax  reproduc- 
tion of  the  Communist  Daily  Worker  of  New  York,  Friday,  Septem- 
ber 2,  1010,  with  reference  to  certain  productions  and  activities  by 
the  Harlem  Unity  Theatre,  in  which  your  name  appears  as  a  director 
of  certain  of  the  presentations  for  the  Harlem  Unity  Theatre.  Kindly 
look  at  that  document  and  if  you  wall  be  good  enough  to,  while  you 
are  under  oath,  verify  the  authenticity  of  that  information. 

(Document  handed  to  wntness.) 

(Witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Holbert.  It  is  highly  possible.  I  don't  remember  it,  but  it  is 
highly  possible. 

(Document  marked  "Holbert  Exhibit  No.  1,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arexs.  Do  you  know^  a  person  by  the  name  of  Paul  Robeson  ? 

Miss  Holbert.  This  is  obviously  a  question  to  trick  me.  May  I 
consult  my  counsel? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  II<  I.BERT.  Do  you  mean  the  great  singer,  Paul  Robeson? 

Mr.  Ari:xs.  Yes,  ma'am. 

Miss  Holbert.  Naturally. 

Mr.  Ari.ns.  Have  you  worked  with  him  in  the  Harlem  Unity 
Theatre? 

(The  witness  conferred  wdth  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Holbert.  No;  I  didn't  work  w'ith  him.  I  have  never  worked 
wnth  him.     I  have  never  had  the  pleasure  of  working  with  him. 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         687 

Mr.  AiJENS.  Do  yoii  know  liiiu  in  any  ca[)ticity,  other  than  the  ca- 
pacity as  a  great  singer  ? 

Miss  PloLBEiiT.  I  only  know  hiin  as  a  very  great  singer. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  served  in  a  Communist  Party  meeting 
witli  him? 

Miss  HoLBEUT.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  iifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  are  the  ages  of  the  students  that  you  instruct  at 
the  Metropolitan  Music  School? 

Miss  IIoLP.ERT.  P^rom  G  to  16,  I  would  say. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  about  how  many  students  do  you  instruct  there? 

Miss  HoLBERT.  I  would  say  25,  roughly. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  that  25  per  week  or  25  a  month  or  day  ? 

Miss  HoLBERT.  I  teach  them  once  a  week, 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  taught  at  tlie  Jefferson  Scliool  of  Social 
Science  ? 

Miss  IIoi.BERT.  1  decline  to  answer  on  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Kearney.  Is  that  the  Comnumist-controlled  school  in  the  city 
of  New  York? 

Mr.  Arens.  Yes,  sir.    It  has  been  cited. 

Have  you  ever  used  any  name  other  than  the  name  pursuant  to 
which  you  are  appearing  today,  Maurine  Holbert? 

Miss  Holbert.  I  have  not. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  that  a  married  name  or  a  maiden  name  ? 

Miss  Holbert.  That  is  the  name  that  my  mother  gave  me. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  had  any  other  name  ? 

Miss  Holbert.  I  was  married  once. 

JSIr.  Arens.  What  was  your  married  name  ? 

Miss  Holbert.  Kennedy. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  were  you  born  ? 

Miss  Holbert.  I  was  born  and  brought  up  in  Texas,  and  I  might 
add  that  I  have  never  been  out  of  the  country.  So  whatever  I  am, 
whatever  I  believe,  America  has  made  me. 

Mr.  Arens.  Give  us,  if  you  please,  a  brief  thumbnail  sketch  of  your 
education. 

Miss  Holbert.  I  was  born  on  a  farm  in  Texas.  My  father  was  a 
country  school  teacher.  I  went  to  a  small  Texas  country  school  until 
I  finished  grammar  school.  Then  I  rode  horseback  12  miles  to  go  to 
high  school  in  a  small  town. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Where  was  this  ? 

Miss  HoLiiERT.  In  Mount  Vernon,  Tex.  From  there  I  went  to  East 
Texas  State  Teachers  College  and  then  took  graduate  work  at  Southern 
Methodist  University.    I  went  to  Southwestern  School  of  the  Theater. 

Mr.  Arens.  Plow  long  have  you  been  engaged  as  a  professional 
actress  ?     Ever  since  you  completed  your  formal  education  ? 

INIiss  Holbert.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  When  did  you  complete  your  formal  education? 

Miss  Holbert.  Oh,  dear 

Mr.  Arens.  Your  best  recollection. 

(The  witness  conferred  w^ith  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Holbert.  My  formal  education  ?  It  was  a  very  embarrassing 
question,  you  know.  It  is  very  unfair  to  ask  an  actress  that.  I  would 
say  roughly  15  years. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  would  con- 
clude the  staff  interrogation  of  this  witness. 


688         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Any  questions,  Congressman  Doyle  ? 

Mr.  Doyle.  Only  this:  I  want  to  congratulate  the  witness  on  her 
professional  achievements  and  hope  the  time  will  come,  before  very 
long,  when  she  can  fairly  say  that  she  is  not  now  a  member  of  the 
Communist  Party  and  does  not  feel  obligated  to  plead  the  constitu- 
tional privilege.  By  that  I  mean  I  am  not  drawing  any  inferences, 
but  I  think  the  time  has  come  when  every  patriotic  American  citizen 
ought  to  be  so  far  removed  from  Communist  Party  membership  or 
any  subversive  activity  that  they  can  honestly  say  that  they  are  not 
now  a  member. 

Miss  HoLBERT.  You  see,  Mr.  Doyle,  I  disagree  with  this.  I  feel 
that  it  is  tremendously  important  that  people  understand  and  use  the 
fifth  amendment.  I  feel  that  my  ancestors  fought  very  long  and  hard 
to  give  me  that  privilege. 

Mr.  Doyle.  I  don't  criticize 

Miss  HoLBERT.  All  right.  I  would  just  like  to  make  this  point.  It 
exists  to  protect  me  from  such  connnittees  as  I  have  seen  the  way 
that  you  liave  functioned  today. 

Mr.  Doyle.  I  don't  criticize 

Miss  HoLBERT.  I  use  it  for  that,  and  I  know  and  you  know  that  it 
does  not  imply  guilt,  but  it  can  be  used  by  the  innocent,  too. 

Mr,  DoYLE.  I  don't  criticize  you  for  using  it  when  you  feel  obli- 
gated to  conscientiously  use  it  and  do  it  in  good  faith.  But  I  do  say 
again,  in  all  respect,  tliat  I  hope  tlie  time  will  come  soon  when  tliere 
will  be  nothing  in  your  exj)erience  as  of  that  date  wliich  will  make  it 
necessary  for  you  to  plead  the  fifth  amendment. 

Miss  HoLBERT.  But  I  tell  you,  Mr.  Doyle,  as  long  as  there  is  a  black- 
list in  my  profession,  which  is  brought  about  by  such  investigations 
as  this,  I  assure  you  that  I  will  use  the  fifth  amendment,  not  only 
to  protect  myself,  but  my  profession  as  well.  I  feel  that  in  any  mo- 
ment in  history  when  there  is  not  freedom  of  expression  for  an  artist, 
that  3'ou  are  stopping  tlie  most  potent  voice  of  the  people;  and  I  feel 
that  such  a  committee  intimidates  people  and  does  this. 

Mr.  Doyle.  There  is  freedom  of  expression  for  every  person  in 
America,  but  they  have  to  do  it  in  accordance  with  hnv. 

Miss  HoLBERT.  That  is  right,  with  a  certain  opinion  that  is  laid 
down.  I  don't  believe  spreading  ideas  is  dangerous.  I  believe  the 
suppression  of  ideas  is  dangerous. 

Mr.  Doyle.  It  certainly  is.  But  not  the  suppression  of  the  Com- 
munist idea 

Miss  HoLBERT.  The  suppression  of  any  idea,  in  my  opinion,  is  dan- 
gerous and  is  against  the  spirit  and  against  the  very  principles  that 
your  ancestors  and  my  ancestors  fouglit  to  achieve  in  this  country; 
and  I  assure  you  that  I  am  not  going  to  betray  them. 

Mr.  Doyle.  The  Communist  idea  in  this  country  would  destroy 
the  FBI,  according  to  a  previous  exhibit  in  this  hearing. 

Miss  HoLBERT.  I  have  faith  in  the  American  people  that  they  will 
not  be  destroyed  by  any  ideology  that  does  not  meet  their  needs.  I 
have  faith  in  the  American  people  because  I  am  one  of  them. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Well,  T  have  the  same  faith. 

Miss  HoLBERT.  I  don't  think  you  have  the  same  faith,  or  you 
wouldn't  be  holdino;  hearings  like  this. 


COMMUNISM    IN   METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         689 

Mr.  Doyle.  I  am  going  after  subversive  communism  or  any  other 
form  of  subversion  wherever  it  exists,  whether  it  is  in  the  musical 
area  or  any  place  else. 

Miss  HoLBERT.  HoAv  clo  you  play  Bach  or  Beethoven  subversively  ? 
I  would  like  to  know. 

Mr.  Doyle.  I  would  like  to  know. 

Miss  Holbert.  Even  the  stool  pigeon  admitted  that  no  politics  was 
taught  in  Metropolitan  School,  and  yet  you  go  on  persecuting  the 
]\Ietropolitan  School.  As  far  as  I  know,  it  has  contributed  only  good 
to  culture  in  this  country. 

(Representative  Kearney  left  the  hearing  room.) 

]VIr.  Doyle.  Anybody  who  helps  the  FBI  uncover  cheats,  crooks,  or 
traitors  is  a  stool  pigeon  in  the  language  of  Communists. 

Miss  Holbert.  In  Texas,  it  is  one  stage  lower  than  a  cattle  rustler. 

Mr.  Doyle,  That  is  right.  I  understand  why  some  of  you  people 
call  the  FBI  stool  pigeons.  We  are  perfectly  familiar  with  the  FBI 
being  called  a  bunch  of  stool  pigeons  by  subversives  and  identified 
Communists. 

Miss  Holbert.  Here  you  are  presuming  that  because  one  says  stool 
pigeon — stool  pigeon  is  a  stool  pigeon  in  any  language.  It  is  a  pretty 
universal  language  and  there  is  a  pretty  universal  feeling  about  it. 

Mr.  Doyle.  In  my  book,  a  patriotic  citizen  who  hel})s  the  internal 
security  of  his  nation  by  working  with  the  FBI  and  tilling  the  truth 
is  not  a  stool  pigeon,  but  rendering  a  community  service.  The  trouble 
is  that  the  Communists  and  those  associated  with  them,  like  some  of 
the  people  in  this  room,  call  them  stool  pigeons. 

Miss  Holbert.  Why  is  this  man  paid  to  do  it,  if  tliis  is  a  patrotic 
duty? 

Mr.  Doyle.  That  is  the  familiar  language. 

Miss  Holbert.  You  cost  me  time  and  money  and  precious  energy  to 
come  down  here  and  defend  me  against  you  and  then  give  me  $9  a  day 
for  my  expenses.     I  don't  understand  this  kind  of  behavior. 

Mr.  Doyle.  I  will  renew  my  invitation.  I  hope  that  tlie  time  will 
come  before  long  when  you  will  think  enough  of  the  internal  security 
of  your  Xation  not  to  call  the  FBI  stool  pigeons. 

5lr.  ]\IouLDER.  Are  there  any  other  questions? 

Mr.  McIntosh.  No  questions. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Are  you  complaining  about  the  witness  fee  of  $9? 
If  we  paid  you  more  money,  would  you  testify? 

Miss  Holbert.  I  certainly  would  not.  It  is  just  mighty  puny  retri- 
bution for  all  the  pain  and  expense  and  losing  of  time  that  you  in- 
flict upon  us  to  come  here  and  defend  ourselves  against  you.  I  think 
it  is  horrible. 

(Representative  Kearney  returned  to  the  hearing  room.) 

Mr.  Xeedleman.  I  thought  there  were  no  more  questions  and  I  got 
up.    I  am  sorry. 

Mr.  jMoulder.  You  are  excused,  and  you  may  receive  your  $9. 

Call  the  next  witness. 

INIr.  Arens.  John  F.  Mehegan.     Come  forward,  please. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Do  you  solemnly  swear  tliat  the  testimony  you  are 
about  to  give  will  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and  nothing  but  the 
truth,  so  help  you  God? 

Mr.  Meiiegan.  I  do. 


690         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

TESTIMONY  OF  JOHN  F.  MEHEGAN,  ACCOMPANIED  BY  COUNSEL, 
CHAELES  E.  GOLDBERG 

Mr.  Arens.  Kindly  identify  yourself  by  n;inie,  residence,  and  occu- 
pation. 

Mr.  Meiiegan.  John  Mehegan,  925  West  End  Avenue,  New  York 
City,  piano  teacher. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  appearing  today  in  response  to  a  subpena  which 
was  served  upon  you  by  the  House  Conmiittee  on  Un-American  Activ- 
ities? 

Mr.  Mehegan.  That  is  true. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  represented  by  counsel  ? 

Mr.  Mehegan.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Counsel,  please  identify  yourself. 

Mr.  Goldberg.  Charles  F.  Goldberg,  230  Park  Avenue,  New  York 
City. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  are  you  employed,  Mr.  JVIehegan  ? 

Mr.  JVIehegan.  INIetropolitan  Music  School. 

Mr.  Arens.  In  what  capacity  ? 

Mr.  Mehegan.  I  am  head  of  the  jazz  department. 

Mr.  ApiEns.  For  how  long  have  you  been  employed  at  the  INIetro- 
politan Music  School  ? 

Mr.  Mehegan.  Twelve  years. 

Mr.  Arens.  How  many  students  do  you  have? 

Mr.  INIehegan.  Per  week  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Yes. 

Mr.  Mehegan.  It  fluctuates,  but  it  is  about  8  to  9. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  are  the  age  groups  ? 

Mr.  Mehegan.  Roughly  from  15  to  20. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  now,  or  have  you  ever  been,  a  member  of  the 
Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Mehegan.  I  am  not  a  member  of  tlie  Communist  Party. 

Mr.  Arens.  Please  answer  tlie  question. 

Mr.  Mehegan.  As  to  the  past,  I  decline  to  answer  on  tlie  basis  of 
my  rights  under  the  first  amendment  and  my  privilege  under  the 
fifth. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  at  any 
time  since  you  were  served  w^ith  your  subpena  to  appear  before  the 
Committee  on  Un-American  Activities? 

Mr.  Mehegan.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  a  member  of  the  Communist  Pai'ty  at  any 
time  in  the  course  of  the  year  1957,  the  current  year? 

Mr.  Mehegan.  I  decline  to  answer. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  a  member  of  the  Connnunist  Party  at  any 
time  during  January  of  1957  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr,  INIehegan.  I  will  repeat,  I  am  not  now  a  member  of  the  C^om- 
munist  Party.  As  to  the  past,  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  previous 
grounds  stated. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  a  member  of  tlie  Communist  l*arty  1  month 
ago? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Mehegan.  I  decline  to  answer. 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN   MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC,         691 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  a  ineinber  of  the  Coiniuunist  Party  2  weeks 

^^go-  .  .  . 

Mr.   Meiiegan.  I   decline  to   answer.     Well,   no,   wait   a   minute. 

That  may  be  in  contradiction  to  the  answer  to  your  previous  (question 

about  since  the  summons  or  tlie  subpena  was  issued. 

Mr.  Arens.  Then  let's  get  the  fact.  Were  you  a  member  of  tiie 
Communist  Party  1  month  ago? 

Mr.  Meiiegan.  I  was  not  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  2 
weeks  ago.     I  don't  know  the  date  of  the  subpena. 

Mr.  Goldberg.  You  were  not  a  member  of  the  (V)miininist  Part}' 
when  you  last  testified  at  the  executive  session,  wliich  was  Febru- 
arys?' 

Mr.  IVIehegan.  I  was  not  a  member  of  the  C^ommunist  Party  on 
February  8. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  were  not  a  member  of  the  Coiniimnist  Party  on 
February  8, 1957,  is  that  correct? 

Mr.  ]\Iehegan.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  on  Feb- 
ruary?, 1957? 

Mr.  ]\Iehegan.  I  decline  to  answer. 

Mr.  Arens.  February  7,  1957,  was  1  day  prior  to  the  time  that  you 
appeared  before  this  committee  in  executive  session,  is  that  correct? 

Mr.  Meiiegan.  That  is  true. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  resign  technical  membership  in  the  Commu- 
nist Party  the  very  day  before  you  were  to  appear  before  this  com- 
mittee in  executive  session,  so  that  you  could  face  the  world  and 
then  say  while  you  were  under  oath  that  you  were  not  then  a  member 
of  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Mehegan.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  presently  under  Communist  Party  discipline  ? 

Mr.  IVIehegan.  I  am  not. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  been  under  Communist  Party  discipline  at 
any  time  since  you  were  served  with  a  subpena  to  appear  before  this 
committee? 

INIr.  ^Meiiegan.  I  have  not  been. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  under  Communist  Party  disci])line  at  any 
time  within  a  week  prior  to  the  time  you  were  served  with  your  sub- 
})ena  to  appear  before  this  committee? 

Mr.  Mehegan.  I  decline  to  ans^ver. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  will  con- 
clude the  staff  interrogation  of  this  witness. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Do  you  have  any  questions,  Mr.  Doyle  ^ 

Mr.  Doyle.  No,  but  I  want  to  compliment  the  young  man  for  get- 
ting out  of  the  Connnunist  Party,  whenever  he  did. 

I  want  to  urge  you  to  put  the  long  life  ahead  of  you  to  more  vig- 
orous, patriotic  eli'orts  to  try  to  make  up  for  Avhatever  luippened  pre- 
viously. I  am  not  assuming  or  inferring  anything,  but  your  country 
needs  you. 

Mr.  Moulder.  ]Mr.  Frazier? 

Mr.  Frazier.  I  have  no  questions. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Mr.  Kearney? 

Mr.  Kearney.  No  questions. 

Mr.  McIntosh.  I  have  no  questions,  Mr.  Chairman. 


692         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

Mr.  Arens.  The  next  witness,  Mr.  Chairman,  will  be  Mr.  Harry 
Smyles. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  which  you 
are  about  to  f^ive  before  the  committee  will  be  the  truth,  the  whole 
truth,  and  nothing  but  the  truth,  so  help  you  God  ? 

Mr.  Smyles.  I  do. 

TESTIMONY  OF  HAKRY  M.  SMYLES,  ACCOMPANIED  BY  COUNSEL, 

MILDRED  EOTH 

Mr.  Arens.  Kindly  identify  yourself  by  name,  residence,  and 
occupation. 

Mr.  Smyles.  My  name  is  Harry  Smyles.  I  am  a  nnisician.  I  live 
at  57  West  122d  Street,  New  York  City. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  appearing  today  in  response  to  a  subpena 
Avhich  was  served  upon  you  by  the  House  Connnittee  on  Un-Ameri- 
can Activities? 

Mr.  Smyles.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  represented  by  counsel  ? 

Mr.  Smyles.  I  am.    Counsel? 

Mr.  Arens.  Will  counsel  please  identify  herself. 

Miss  EoTH.  Mildred  Roth,  401  Broadway,  New  York,  N.  Y. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Smyles,  where  are  you  employed  ? 

Mr,  Smyles.  I  am  employed  at  the  Metropolitan  Music  School. 
At  present,  I  am  on  leave  as  I  am  playing  a  show. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  show  are  you  playing? 

Mr.  Smyles.  New  Girl  in  Town. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  is  that  ? 

Mr.  Smyles.  In  New  Haven  at  present. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  do  you  play  ? 

Mr.  Smyles.  I  play  oboe  and  English  horn. 

Mr.  Arens.  Then  you  are  employed  presently,  is  that  right? 

Mr.  Smyles.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Arens.  How  long  have  you  been  an  instructor  at  the  Metro- 
politan Music  School  ? 

Mr.  Smyles.  This  is  going  on  my  fourth  year. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  do  you  teach  ? 

Mr.  Smyles.  I  teach  recorder  and  oboe. 

Mr.  Arens.  How  many  students  do  you  have  ? 

Mr.  Smyles.  It  is  a  matter  of  record  at  the  school.  I  am  not  sure. 
I  have  classes  of  varying  sizes. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  is  your  best  appraisal  or  judgment  on  the  size? 

Mr.  Smyles.  The  average  class  is  about  four  students. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  are  the  age  groups  ? 

Mr.  Smyles.  x\ny where  from  6  to  about  10  years. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you,  in  the  recent  past,  since  the  executive  session 
of  this  committee,  have  occasion  to  be  on  an  NBC-TV  nationwide 
broadcast  ? 

Mr.  Smyles.  Yes,  I  appeared  on  NBC. 

Mr.  Arens.  On  what  program  did  you  appear  on  NBC  ? 

Mr.  Smyles.  On  Today  show. 

Mr.  Arens.  Who  sponsored  that  show  or  who  was  the  MC  ? 

Mr.  Smyles.  It  is  the  Dave  Garroway  show,  but  Dave  Garroway 
wasn't  present  when  I  appeared. 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         693 

Mr.  Arexs.  Who  was  present?  Who  was  the  leading  light  of  that 
particular  production  ? 

Mr.  Smyles.  I  have  forgotten  his  name,  frankly. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  interviewed  then  with  respect  to  your  then 
prospective  appearance  before  the  House  Un-American  Activities 
Committee  ? 

Mr.  Smyles.  To  my  great  surprise,  I  was. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  appeared  before  this  committee  in  executive  ses- 
sion in  February,  did  you  not? 

Mr.  Smyles.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Arens.  Your  TV  appearance  was  after  your  appearance  in 
executive  session  ? 

Mr.  Smyles.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  that  was  in  anticipation  of  youi-  present  appear- 
ance, was  it  not? 

Mr,  Smyles.  Anticipation? 

Mr.  Arens.  Yes. 

Mr.  Smyles.  I  don't  know  what  you  mean. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  have  conversation  in  the  interview,  on  the 
nationwide  interview,  with  respect  to  your  appearance  that  is  sched- 
uled for  now? 

Mr.  Smyles.  It  was  a  complete  surprise  to  me  tliat  tliey  asked  me 
the  question. 

Mv.  Arens.  Did  they  ask  you  wliether  or  not  you  would  answer  all 
questions  before  this  committee  ? 

Mr,  Smyi.es.  I  was  asked  the  question. 

Mr,  Arens,  And  what  did  you  reply  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Smyles.  I  was  asked  if  I  would  answer  questions  put  to  me  by 
the  committee,  and  I  said  that  I  would. 

Mr,  Arens,  You  told  tliem  you  would  answer  all  questions  before 
this  committee,  did  you  not? 

Mr.  Smyles.  May  I  qualify  that? 

Mr.  Arens,  Surely, 

Mr.  Smyles.  I  would  like  to  add  that  I  meant  all  proper  questions, 
all  questions  which  I  consider  proper. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  didn't  say  that  when  you  were  interviewed  on 
nationwide  television,  did  you? 

Mr,  Smyles.  That  wasn't  the  purpose  of  the  television  show. 

Mr.  Arens.  Just  ans-^er  the  question.  You  didn't  say  that,  when 
you  were  asked  whether  you  were  going  to  answer  questions  before  this 
committee,  on  this  nationwide  television  program,  did  you  ? 

Mr,  Smyles.  I  don't  think  the  word  "all"  was  used.  I  am  not  sure, 
but  I  think  I  said  I  would  answer  questions  put  to  me 

Mr.  Arens.  I  will  read  you  an  exact  ti-anscript  of  your  answers  and 
see  if,  while  you  are  under  oath,  you  will  not  confirm  it. 

Q.  Do  you  have  any  plans  riirlit  now,  that  you  think  of  your  forthcoming 
appearance  heforo  the  House  Un-American  Activities  Committee  for  resorting  to 
the  first  or  fifth  amendments  if  asked  some  provocative  question? 

A.  Well,  I  think  I'll  be  able  to  answer  all  the  questions  that  the  committee  asks 
me. 

Is  that  a  true  and  correct  reproduction  of  the  words  used  in  the 
course  of  that  interview  on  the  nationwide  television  show  ? 
(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 


694         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

Mr.  Smyles.  I  don't  recall  that  that  was  the  question,  that  the  ques- 
tion was  put  to  me  in  exactly  the  words  that  you  used. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  tell  the  interrogator  in  this  nationwide  show 
that  you  were  going  to  answer  all  questions  before  the  House  Commit- 
tee on  Un-American  Activities? 

Mr.  Smtles.  As  I  stated  before,  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge,  to  the 
best  of  my  recollection,  I  said  that  I  would  answer  questions  put  to  me 
by  the  committee. 

Mr.  Arens.  Then  answer  this  question :  Are  you  now,  or  have  you 
ever  been,  a  member  of  the  Commmiist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Smyles.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  under  my  rights 
under  the  fifth  amendment  of  the  Constitution  not  to  be  a  witness 
against  myself. 

Mr.  Kearney.  IMr.  Counsel,  may  I  remind  counsel  of  the  committee 
that  at  the  time  the  witness  was  on  the  air  he  was  not  under  oath.  He 
is  under  oath  today. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  say  to  the  interrogator  on  the  nationwide  tele- 
vision program  that  you  had  been  subpenaed  before  this  committee 
but  you  did  not  understand  why ;  you  had  no  idea  why  this  committee 
would  want  to  talk  to  you  ?  Is  that  the  essence  of  what  you  said  to  the 
interrogator  on  the  nationwide  television  program? 

IMr.  Smyles.  I  think  during  the  first  hour  he  said  "Do  you  have  any 
idea  why  you  were  subpenaed,"  and  I  said  that  I  didn't  have  any  idea 
because  I  didn't  feel  that  playing  music — I  didn't  see  where  playing 
music  could  be  subversi^^e  in  any  way. 

Mr.  Arens.  This  interrogation  was  after  you  had  been  subpenaed 
before  this  committee  in  executive  session,  was  it  not  ? 

Mr.  Smyles.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  you  did  derive  some  little  idea  in  the  executive 
session  what  this  committee  was  intei-rogating  you  about,  did  you 
not? 

Mr.  Smyles.  Is  this  an  interrogation  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Yes,  sir.     I  am  asking  you  that  question. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Smyles.  You  are  trying  to  get  from  me  that  I  understood  in 
the  executive  session — coidd  I  have  the  (|uestion? 

(The  reporter  read  from  his  notes  as  rtMiuested.) 

Mr.  Smyles.  Yes,  I  did.  But  I  still  don't  see  any  connection  be- 
tween the  questions  that  were  asked  me  and  my  profession  as  a 
musician. 

Mr.  Arens.  In  the  executive  session,  you  were  interrogated  as  to 
whether  or  not  you  were  a  member  of  tlie  Communist  Party,  were 
you  not  ? 

Mr.  Smyles.  You  asked  me  the  same  questions  you  just  asked  me. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  you  knew  that  as  of  the  time  you  were  on  the 
nationwide  television  and  interrogated  on  the  Dave  Garroway  show, 
isn't  that  correct  ? 

Mr.  Smyles.  I  wasn't  being  interroanted.    I  was  being  interviewed. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  knew,  as  of  the  ti.me  of  that  interview,  that  when 
you  were  before  this  committee  in  executive  session  you  were  in- 
terrogated with  reference  to  whether  or  not  you  had  ever  been  a  mem- 
ber of  the  Communist  Party,  isn't  that  correct  ? 
(The  witness  conferred  with  his  couns(>l.) 

Mr.  Smyles.  Yes,  I  knew  that. 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         695 

Mr.  Arens.  And  yet  you  told  tlieiu  you  had  no  idea  why  you  weiv 
subpenaed  before  this  committee,  that  you  were  just  a  musician  _^ 

Mr.  Smyles.  Because  I  was  on  that  particuhir  show  as  a  nnisic-ian. 
I  felt  it  was  irrelevant  to  that  particular  appearance. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  have  occasion  to  be  interviewed  by  a  repre- 
sentative of  Life  magazine  in  the  course  of  the  last  several  weeks  ? 

Mr.  Smyles.  What  do  you  mean,  the  last  several  weeks '. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  been  interviewed  by  a  representative  ol"  J^ile 
magazine  in  the  recent  past  '\ 

Mr.  Smyles.  Yes,  I  have. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  permit  your  ph(>t()iira})h  (o  be  taken  for  an 
article  by  Life  magazine  ? 

Mr.  Smyles.  Photograplis  were  taken,  yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  did  you  tell  them  of  employment  probh^ns  tinit 
you  were  having  ? 

Mr.  Smyles.  I  did. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  did  you  tell  tJiem  in  ell'ect  that  you  liad  been  dis- 
criminated against  in  employment  because  of  ''accused  h' ft  wing  ac- 
tivity"? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Smyles.  You  asked  me  a  couple  of  questions,  1  think,  there. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  just  asked  you  a  question  as  to  whether  or  not  you 
had  been  interviewed,  and  then  I  asked  you  whether  or  not  you  told 
the  interviewer  of  Life  magazine  that  you  had  been  discriminated 
against  in  employment  because  you  had  been  accused  of  leftwing 
activity. 

Mr  Smyles.  No,  I  didn't  tell  the  Life  magazine  reporter  that. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  did  you  tell  him? 

Mr.  Smyles.  Our  discussion  concerned  discrimination  generally  in 
the  classical  field  against  Negroes.    That  means  symphony  oi"chestras. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  read  the  article  as  it  appeared  in  Life  maga- 
zine W'ith  reference  to  yourself? 

Mr.  Smyles.  Yes,  I  did. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  remonstrate  with  the  Life  magazine  that  you 
were  misquoted  or  that  there  was  a  misinterpretation  of  your  own 
status,  when  the  Life  magazine  says  that  you  were  discriminated 
against  because  of  accused  leftwing  activity? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Smithes.  Would  yon  re])eat  what  you  said  about  what  the  Life 
magazine  article  said,  please? 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Reporter,  please  read  the  item  back  to  hiuK  T 
think  he  understands  it. 

(The  reporter  read  fi-om  his  notes  as  requested.) 

(The  witness  conferred  with  iiis  counsel.) 

Mr.  Smyles.  I  would  have  to  see  the  article,  because  I  don't 
think 

Mr.  Arens.  You  have  seen  the  article,  have  you  not? 

Mr.  Smyles.  I  have  seen  it,  but  I  have  not  looked  at  it  in  some 
time.    I  don't  think  it  said  that. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  will  read  it  to  you. 

Yet  Smyles  li;is  never  found  ;i  syi!ii)linny  that  would  hire  him. 

I  am  breaking  into  the  context  of  tlie  article  because  it  is  so  long. 

He  has  strongly  and  vocally   alt    eked   such   exclusion  and  has,   in   (urn,  heen 
accused  of  leftwing  activity.    'J'his  is  not  what  keeps  hiui  out — 


696         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

and  so  forth. 

Kindly  look  at  this  article  with  your  photographs  (Life  magazine, 
March  11,  1957)  and  tell  this  committee  whether  or  not  you  informed 
Life  magazine  writers  that  you  had  been  accused  of  leftwing  activity. 
(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Smyles.  I  didn't  say  this  to  the  Life  magazine  people. 

Mr.  Arens.  They  misquoted  you  or  misinterpreted  you,  is  that 
right  ? 

Mr.  Smyles.  I  didn't  say  that  I  had  been  kept  out 

Mr.  Arens.  "We  have  your  answer  on  the  record.  We  want  to  get  on 
here. 

(Document  marked  "Smyles  Exhibit  No.  1,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Miss  Roth.  May  I  consult  with  the  witness? 

]\Ir.  Arens.  Surely,  you  may  consult  with  him  all  you  care  to. 
Ma'am,  within  reason. 

Miss  KoTii.  You  had  a  question  on  the  record. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  may  consult  with  your  client  any  time  you  wish 
to,  within  reason. 

Miss  EoTii.  I  am  right  now,  and  I  think  I  am  being  very  reasonable 
in  time. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  go  right  ahead. 

(The  witness  confeiTed  with  her  counsel.) 

Mr.  Smyles.  I  never  said  that  anything  to  do  with  leftwing  activi- 
ties kept  me  out, 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  tell  the  Life  correspondent  that  you  had  been 
a  member  of  the  conspiratorial  apparatus  known  as  the  Communist 
Party? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Smyles.  I  will  have  to  decline  to  answer  that  on  the  basis  of 
my  rights  under  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  didn't  suggest  to  the  Life  correspondent  that 
your  activities  in  the  Communist  conspiracy  might  have  had  some 
bearing  upon  your  employment  difficulties,  did  you  ? 

Mr.  Smyles.  You  are  inferring 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Smyles.  The   article  says  "This  is  not  what  keeps  him  out." 

Mr.  Arens.  Answer  that  question.  You  didn't  tell  the  Life  maga- 
zine man  whether  or  not  you  had  been  a  member  of  the  Communist 
Party,  did  you  ? 

Mr.  Smyles.  No. 

Mr.  Arens.  Sir? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Smyles.  No. 

Mr,  Arens.  Don't  you  think  that  might  have  a  little  pertinency 
as  to  whether  or  not  you  are  having  emplojnnent  difficulty  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Smyles.  I  told  the  Life  magazine  reporter  Avhat  the  article 
says,  that  this  is  not 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  he  interview 


Miss  EoTH,  May  the  witness  complete  his  answer  ? 
Mr.  Smyles,  That  this  is  not  what  has  kept  me  or  any  other 
Negro  out  of  it. 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         697 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  he  interview  you  after   the  executive  session  in 
which  you  appeared  before  this  committee  ? 
Mr.  Smyles.  Did  the  reporter  interview  me  ? 
Mr.  Arens.  Yes. 
Mr.  Smyles.  I  had  various  meetings  with  the  reporter,  countless 

meetings. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  have  any  meetings  with  hnn  after  you  ap- 
peared before  this  committee  in  executive  session? 

Mr.  Smyles.  Coukl  you  tell  me  the  date  of  the  article?  Then  I 
probably  could  answer. 

Mr.  Moulder.  March  11,  1957. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Smyles.  I  probably  did. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  did  you  at  any  time,  in  these  interviews  with 
this  Life  reporter  after  you  had  been  in  executive  session  before  this 
committee,  ever  tell  him  that  you  had  been  in  executive  session  before 
this  committee? 

Mr.  Smyles.  I  don't  remember  if  I  did  or  not. 

Mr.  Arens.  If  you  had  told  him  that,  you  would  have  read  it, 
would  you  not  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Smyles.  I  told  him  that  I  was  under  subpena.  I  remember 
that,  but  I  don't  remember  if  I  told  him  I  had  been  in  executive 
session. 

Mr.  Moulder.  IMay  I  inquire?  Did  you  at  any  time  tell  him 
that  you  had  never  been  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  ? 

]\Ir.  Smyles.  I  decline  to  answer  that  on  the  basis  of  the  fifth 
amendment. 

Mr.  Kearney.  May  I  ask  a  question,  Mr.  Chairman?  I  have  not 
fully  read  the  article  in  Life,  but  do  I  understand  from  it  that  you 
figure  you  have  been  discriminated  against? 

Mr.  Smyles.  If  you  haven't  read  the  article,  Congressman,  the 
article  was  about  discrimination  in  the  North.  It  seems  that  Life 
magazine  had  done  a  previous  article  on  discrimination  in  the  South. 
This  article  was  to  show  the  many  subtle  ways  in  which  discrimination 
still  exists  in  the  North. 

Mr.  Kearney.  That  is  what  I  am  getting  at,  that  j'ou  feel  you  have 
been  discriminated  against. 

Mr.  Smyles.  I  and  all  other  Negro  musicians  who  aspire  to  the 
classical  field. 

Mr.  Kearney.  Did  you  ever  take  your  question  of  discrimination 
up  with  the  Anti-Discrimination  Committee  of  the  State  of  New 
York? 

Mr.  Smi-les.  No;  I  haven't.  I  have  taken  it  to  tlie  Local  802,  our 
union,  on  many  occasions. 

Mr.  Kearney.  That  is  the  place  where  they  take  all  of  these  ques- 
tions, isn't  it,  if  I  understand  tlie  New  York  State  law  ? 

Mr.  Smyles.  I  don't  know  this  organization  that  you  speak  of. 
Is  that  SCAD? 

]Mr.  Kearney.  It  is  a  New  York  State  organization. 

INIr.  Smyles.  I  take  it  where  I  am  a  member,  before  Local  802,  the 
board  of  Local  802. 

91198— 57— pt.  1 7 


698         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

Mr.  Kearnf.y.  Do  they  take  it  before  the  State  organization? 

Mr.  Smyles.  They  may,  in  a  specific  case,  if  there  is  a  specific  case. 

Mr.  Kearney.  Do  you  know  if  they  took  your  case  before  it  ? 

Mr.  Smyees.  They  haven't. 

Mr.  Akens.  Do  von  occupy  an  office  in  Local  802? 

Mr.  Smyles.  I  do  not. 

]HTv.  Arens.  Have  vou  ever  occui)ied  an  office  in  Local  802? 

Mr.  Smyles.  No  ;  I  have  not. 

iNTr.  Arexs.  Have  you  ever  served  in  the  LTnited  States  Army? 

Mr.  Smyles,  Yes. 

M)-.  Arens.  Wlien  ? 

Mr.  Smyles.  1942  to  1946. 

Mr.  Arens.  Durinnj  the  course  of  your  service  in  the  United  States 
Army  w^^re  you  ever,  during  that  period  of  time,  a  member  of  the 
Connnunist  Party  ? 

Mr.  S:\rYi,ES.  I  decline  to  answer  that  mider  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  ^Vhere  did  you  serve  in  the  United  States  Army  ? 

Mr.  Smyles.  Two  and  a  half  years  in  Georgia  and  a  year  in  France. 

Mr.  Arens.  In  what  capacity? 

Mr.  Smyles.  I  started  out  as  a  buck  sergeant  in  the  Quartermaster 
Cor])s  and  I  ended  up  in  the  Quartermaster  Corps. 

]\Ir.  Arens.  In  what  status? 

Mr.  Smyles.  Master  sergeant. 

INIr.  Arens.  Are  you  a  composer  of  music,  too  ? 

Mr.  Smyles.  No ;  I  am  not. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  would  like  to  lay  before  you  now  a  thermofax  repro- 
duction of  the  Communist  Daily  Worker  of  February  23,  1954,  with 
reference  to  a  concert,  nuisic  by  Negro  composers,  from  symphonic 
nuances  to  jazz  improvisations;  participating  artists,  naming  a  num- 
ber, include  Harry  Smyles;  all  under  the  auspices  of  the  New  York 
Council  of  Arts,  Sciences,  and  Professions.  See  if  that  refreshes  your 
recollection  with  reference  to  your  appearance  at  that  function. 

(Document  handed  to  witness.) 

(Witness  conferred  witli  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Smyles.  Yes ;  this  was  a  job  that  I  played  at. 

(Document  marked  "Smyles  Exhibit  No.  2,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

*  ****** 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  yon  a  Communist  when  you  played  there  ? 

Mr.  Smyles.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  under  the  fifth 
amendment  of  the  Constitution. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  taught  at  the  Jefferson  School  of  Social 
Science  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Smyles.  No  ;  I  have  not. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  appeared  there  in  a  professional  ca- 
pacity ? 

Mr.  Smyles.  No;  I  have  not. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  appeared  under  the  auspices  of  the  Divi- 
sion of  Jewish  Studies  of  the  Jefferson  School  of  Social  Science? 

Mr.  Smyles.  Not  to  the  best  of  my  reproduction. 

Mr.  Arens.  T  lay  before  you  now  a  thermofax  reproduction  of  a 
leaflet  showing  an  appearance  by  yoiu'self  at  Town  Hall,  8:  30  p.  m.. 
Division  of  Jewish  Studies  of  the  Jefferson  School  of  Social  Science. 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         699 

Harry  Smyles,  oboist.  Kindly  look  at  that  document  and  tell  us,  if 
you  please,  sir,  if  that  refreshes  your  recollection  with  reference  to 
your  appearance  on  that  occasion. 

(Document  handed  to  witness.) 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Smyles.  As  an  oboist  I  have  appeared  many  places.  I  have 
no  recollection  of  this.    This  is  quite  some  time  ago. 

(Document  marked  "Smyles  Exhibit  No.  -3,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  play  with  the  Cleveland  Philharmonic  Sym- 
phony? 

Mr.  Smyles.  Yes,  I  did. 

Mr.  Arens.  "Who  engaged  you  for  that  production  ? 

Mr.  Smyles.  It  was  a  regular  symphony  orchestra. 

Mr.  Arens.  Yes,  but  who  engaged  you  ? 

Mr.  Smyles.  The  conductor. 

Mr.  Arens.  "VVlio  was  he? 

Mr.  ]\IouLDER.  Do  we  have  any  evidence  that  that  person  was  a 
Communist  or  active  in  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  I  don't  know  who  he  is  yet. 

Mr.  Smyles.  He  is  the  head  of  the  music  department  at  Western 
Reserve  University,  Cleveland,  Ohio,  Dr.  F.  Carl  Grossman. 

Mr.  Arens.  At  any  time  was  the  subject  of  Communist  Party 
membership  a  subject  of  conversation  as  a  prerequisite  to  your  obtain- 
ing employment  in  that  organization? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Smyles.  No. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  at  the  time 
you  were  appearing  with  the  Cleveland  Philharmonic  Symphony  ? 

Mr.  Smyles.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  the  basis  of  the 
fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  will  conclude 
the  staff  interrogation  of  this  witness. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Are  there  any  questions  ? 

Mr.  Doyle.  No  questions. 

Mr.  Frazeer.  No  questions. 

Mr.  Kearney.  I  have  a  question.    You  are  a  member  of  Local  802? 

Mr.  Smyles.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Kearney.  From  the  questions  previously  asked  you,  I  would 
suggest  this :  That  you  go  to  your  office  of  Local  802,  if  you  feel  you 
have  been  discriminated  against,  because  that  is  the  reason  that  law 
is  on  the  statute  books  of  the  State  of  New  York,  to  prevent  such 
cases. 

Mr.  Smyles.  I  have  been  before  the  board  many  times.  I  have 
been  before  the  union  many  times. 

Mr.  Kearney.  On  this  question  ? 

Mr.  Smyles.  Yes. 

Mr.  Kearney.  Did  you  ever  get  a  report  from  them  as  to  what 
happened,  or  whether  they  did  anything  or  not  for  you  ? 

Mr.  Smyles.  Once  a  year,  they  give  a  Negro  his  three-week  pro- 
gram in  which  they  employ  an  orchestra  of  Negro  musicians  and 
white  musicians,  which  is  broadcast  to  Europe  by  the  State  Depart- 
ment.   Last  year  we  gave  a  very  wonderful  concert. 


700         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

Mr.  Kearney.  No,  I  mean  on  your  particular  case,  whether  your 
officers  went  before  the  State  commission  or  not. 

Mr.  Smyles.  There  hasn't  been  any  specific  instance. 

Mr.  Kearney.  There  hasn't  been  any  specific  instance. 

Mr.  Smyles.  That  is  all. 

Mr.  Moulder.  Are  there  any  other  questions  ? 

Mr.  McIntosh.  No  questions. 

Mr.  Moulder.  I  want  to  ask  a  question  or  two  to  clarify  some  of 
your  testimony  previously  given. 

As  I  understand  from  the  beginning,  on  this  program  of  March  11 
for  the  NBC-TV,  counsel  asked  you  several  questions  about  it,  and 
this  question  was  asked  you : 

Well,  now,  do  you  plan  to  answer  all  the  questions  the  committee  will  put 
to  you,  or  are  you  going  to  take  refuge  behind  the  first  or  fifth  amendments 
when  you  go  before  the  committee? 

Your  answer  was : 

Franlily,  at  the  present  time  I  really  don't  know  what  my  position  is  going  to 
be. 

Is  that  correct  ? 

Mr.  Smyles.  That  was  correct. 

Mr.  Arens.  May  I  clarify  that?  The  interview  I  was  asking  him 
about  was  the  second  interview.  The  interview  from  which  the  chair- 
man is  now  reading  is  the  informal  first  interview.  I  was  reading 
from  the  interview  wliich  went  out  across  this  Nation  wliich  is  at  the 
bottom  of  the  page, 

Mr.  Moulder.  I  just  wanted  to  ask  the  witness  if  this  was  true  and 
correct. 

What  is  your  present  attitude  now  about  the  Communist  Party? 
What  was  your  response  to  tlie  question  when  you  were  asked  if  you 
were  a  member  ? 

Mr.  Smyles.  I  decline  to  answer  that  under  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Moulder.  You  decline  to  answer  it  as  to  your  present  affilia- 
tion as  to  whether  or  not  you  are  ? 

Mr.  Smyles.  You  are  inferring.  I  haven't  said  anything  about 
affiliation. 

Mr.  Moulder.  I  am  not  inferring  anything.  I  understood  you  to 
have  said  you  were  not  now,  I  have  forgotten  the  previous  part  of 
your  testimony.  You  said  you  were  not  now,  but  declined  to  answer 
as  to  the  other, 

Mr,  Smyles.  I  decline  to  answer  under  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr,  Moulder.  I  want  to  clarify  this.  This  witness  is  claiming  dis- 
crimination. As  I  understand  the  theme  of  counsel's  questions,  it  is 
discrimination  because  you  are  Negro.  That  is,  from  this  article  in 
Life  magazine.  It  appears  that  there  may  be  some  other  causes  why 
you  may  have  been  handicapped  in  your  musical  career.  That  is  be- 
cause of  your 

Mr.  Smyles.  You  take  this  as  though  I  am  the  only  Negro.  There 
are  many  Negroes.  For  instance,  in  all  of  the  symphony  orchestras 
of  this  country,  as  of  now  none  of  the  major  symphony  orchestras  in 
this  country  employ  a  Negro  musician. 

Mr.  Moulder.  You  served  in  the  Armed  Forces? 

Mr,  Smyles,  I  was  in  the  Armed  Forces  when  there  was  no  inte- 
gration.   I  was  in  a  Jim  Crow  part  of  the  Armed  Forces. 


COMMUNISM    IN   METROPOLITAN   MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         701 

Mr.  Moulder.  And  you  received  an  honorable  discharge? 

Mr,  Smyles.  I  did,  sir. 

Mr.  Moulder.  You  served  your  country  f  aithl'idly  and  patriotically 
as  a  member  of  the  armed  services? 

Mr.  Smyles.  I  did. 

Mr.  Moulder.  I  want  to  ask  you  this  question  :  In  the  event  of  a  war 
between  our  country  and  the  Soviet  Union,  Avould  you  still  fight  on 
the  side  of  your  counti'y,  just  as  you  did  before? 

Mr.  Smyles.  If  this  country  was  attacked  by  any  other  country, 
1  would  fight  for  my  wife,  my  children,  my  home. 

Mr.  Moulder.  My  point  is  this :  In  the  event  our  country  was  em- 
broiled, or  became  involved,  in  a  war  with  Russia,  w^ould  you  fight  to 
defend  your  country? 

INIr.  Smyles.  I  am  not  a  soldier,  I  am  a  musician;  but  if  I  was 
(h-afted,  as  I  was  drafted  before,  I  would  serve  as  I  did  before. 

Mr.  Kearney.  I  move,  Mr.  Chairman,  that  we  adjourn  until  10 
o'clock  tomorrow  uiorning. 

JNIr.  Moulder.  The  committee  will  now  recess.  The  subpenas  of  the 
witnesses  who  have  not  testified  today  will  continue,  and  they  will 
appear  here  tomorrow  morning  at  10  o'clock. 

(Whereupon,  at  4:-^>5  p.  m.  Tuesday,  April  9,  the  committee  was 
recessed,  to  reconvene  at  10  a.  m.  Wednesday,  April  10, 1957.) 


NVESTIGATION  OF  COMMUNISM  IN  THE  METROPOLI- 
TAN MUSIC  SCHOOL,  INC.,  AND  RELATED  FIELDS- 
PART   1 


WEDNESDAY,   APRIL   10,    1957 

United  States  House  of  Representatives, 

Subcommittee  of  the 
Committee  on  Un-American  Activities, 

New  York,  N.  Y. 
public  hearing 

The  subcommittee  of  tlie  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities  met 
at  10 :  10  a.  m.,  pursuant  to  recess,  in  room  35,  United  States  courthouse, 
Foley  Square,  New  York,  N.  Y.,  Hon.  Clyde  Doyle  presiding. 

(^onnnittee  members  present:  Representatives  Clyde  Doyle  of  Cali- 
fornia, James  B.  Frazier,  Jr.,  of  Tennessee,  Bernard  W.  Kearney  of 
New  York,  and  Robert  J.  Mcintosh  of  Michigan. 

Staff  members  present:  Richard  Arens,  director;  Dolores  Scotti, 
irivestigator;  Frank  Bonora,  acting  clerk. 

(Present  at  the  opening  of  the  hearing:  Representatives  Clyde 
Doyle,  James  B.  Frazier,  Jr.,  Bernard  W.  Kearney,  and  Robert  J. 
Mcintosh.) 

Mr.  Doyle.  The  subconunittee  will  be  in  order.  Mr.  Arens,  will 
you  call  your  first  witness  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  David  Walter,  please  come  forward. 

Mr.  DoYi^E.  May  the  record  show  that  tlie  committee  reconvened 
Ihis  morning  at  10:  10,  the  subcommittee  members  present  being  Mr. 
Frazier,  Mr.  Kearney,  Mr.  Mcintosh,  and  myself.  Mr.  Moulder  is 
not  present  at  the  moment. 

We  will  proceed. 

Mr.  Arens.  Miss  Thelma  Pyle,  please  come  forward. 

The  counsel  to  David  Walter,  Mr.  Chairman,  made  a  spei^-ial  request 
tliat  he  be  taken  very  early  this  morning  because  of  other  commitments. 
I  have  called  him,  but  he  is  not  here.  We  will  proceed  with  this 
witness  and  try  to  work  him  in  as  we  can. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Do  you  solenndy  swear  that  you  will  tell  the  truth,  the 
whole  truth,  and  nothing  but  tlie  truth,  so  help  you  God? 

Miss  Pyle.  I  do. 

TESTIMONY  OF  THELMA  PYLE,  ACCOMPANIED  BY  COUNSEL, 

MILDRED  ROTH 

Mr.  Arens.  Kindly  identify  yourself  by  name,  residence,  and  occu- 
pation. 

Miss  Pyle.  ]\[y  name  is  Thelma  Pyle.  I  live  at  549  Riverside  Drive. 
1  am  a  piano  teacher. 

703 


704         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  are  you  employed,  Miss  Pyle? 

Miss  Pyle.  I  teach  privately  and  at  the  Metropolitan  ]\Iusic  School. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  on  the  board  of  directors  of  the  Metropolitan 
Music  School  ? 

Miss  Pyle.  Yes.    I  was  elected  by  the  faculty  to  serve. 

Mr.  Arens.  How  long  have  you  been  on  the  board  of  directors  of 
the  Metropolitan  IMusic  School  ? 

Miss  Pyle.  To  the  best  of  my  recollection,  it  is  4  or  6  years.  I  am 
not  sure. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  appearing  today  in  response  to  a  subjDena 
which  was  served  upon  you  by  the  House  Committee  on  Un-American 
Activities  ? 

Miss  Pyle.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  you  are  represented  by  counsel? 

Miss  Pyle.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Counsel,  kindly  identify  yourself. 

Miss  Roth.  Mildred  Eoth,'  401  Broadway,  New  York  City. 

Mr.  Arens.  Miss  Pyle,  do  vou  know  a  person  by  the  name  of  Leon- 
ard Cherlin? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Mr.  Arens.  He  spells  his  name  C-h-e-r-1-i-n. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Pyle.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  basis  of  my  rights  under  the 
fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Miss  P^de,  yesterday  ]\Ir.  Leonard  Cherlin  took  an  oath 
before  this  committee  and  testified  that  while  he  was  a  member  of  the 
Communist  Party  he  knew  you  as  a  Communist.  Was  he  lying  or 
was  he  telling  the  truth  ? 

Miss  Pyle.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  basis  of  my  rights  under  the 
fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  now,  this  moment,  a  member  of  the  Com- 
munist Party? 

Miss  Pyle.  I  decline  to  answer  o]i  the  same  basis. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  were  you  employed  immediately  prior  to  your 
employment  with  the  Metropolitan  JNIusic  School? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Pyle.  I  think  perhaps  I  have  to  explain.  I  teach  there  only 
1  day  a  week.  The  rest  of  my  teaching  is  private,  as  I  explained  to 
you.  I  have  also  taught  at  another  school,  the  Academy  of  Mount 
St.  Ursula. 

Mr.  ApuEns.  Where  is  that,  please? 

Miss  Pyle.  That  is  in  the  Bronx. 

Mr.  Arens.  Over  what  period  of  time  did  you  teach  there? 

Miss  Pyle.  I  taught  there  for  approximately  10  years. 

Mr.  Arens.  Would  you  tell  us  the  dates,  roughly  speaking? 

Miss  Pyle.  I  think  it  was  2  years  ago  that  I  resigned  because  of  the 
growth  of  my  private  teaching. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  while 
you  were  engaged  in  teaching  at  ISIount  St.  Ursula  ? 

Miss  Pyle.  I  decline  to  answer  under  my  rights  under  the  fifth 
amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Was  your  disassociation  from  Mount  St.  Ursula 
Academj^  wholly  and  completely  voluntary,  or  was  it  a  forced  dis- 
association ? 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         705 

Miss  Ptle.  It  was  wholly  voluntary. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Mr.  Chairnkn,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  concludes 
the  staff  interrogration  of  this  witness. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Mr.  Frazier? 

Mr.  Frazier.  No  questions. 

JNIr.  Doyle.  ISIr.  Kearney  ? 

Mr.  Kearney.  I  have  no  questions. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Mr.  Mcintosh  ? 

Mr.  McIntosii.  I  have  no  questions. 

Mr.  Doyle.  I  have  no  questions.     The  witness  is  excused. 

Call  your  next  witness. 

Mr.  Aeens.  Lucy  Brown,  please  come  forward. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Will  you  please  raise  your  right  hand  and  be  sworn  ? 

Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  you  will  tell  the  truth,  the  whole  truth, 
and  nothing  but  the  truth,  so  help  you  God  ^ 

Miss  Bro^vn.  I  do. 

TESTIMONY  OF  LUCY  BROWN  (LUCY  BROWN  WAILACH),  ACCOM- 
PANIED BY  COUNSEL,  ISIDORE  G.  NEEDLEMAN 

Mr.  Arexs.  Kindly  identify  yourself  by  name,  residence,  and  occu- 
pation. 

Miss  Browx.  Lucy  Brown,  100  West  91st  Street,  musician. 

Mr.  Arexs.  You  are  appearing  today,  Miss  Brown,  in  response  to  a 
subpena  which  was  served  upon  you  by  the  House  Committee  on  Un- 
American  Activities  ? 

Miss  Browx.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arexs.  And  you  are  represented  by  counsel  ? 

Miss  Browx.  I  am. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Counsel,  will  you  kindly  identify  yourself  i 

Mr.  Needle3Iax.  Isidore  G.  Needleman,  165  Broadway,  New  York 
6,N.Y. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Is  your  name  "Miss"  Brown  or  "Mrs."  Brown  ? 

Miss  Browx^.  My  professional  name  is  i\liss  Lucy  Brown. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Do  you  have  a  nonprofessional  name  or  a  name  that  is 
not  in  a  professional  category  ? 

Miss  Browx.  I  would  like  to  consult  my  lawyer. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Browx".  I  am  married,  and  my  married  name  is  Lucy  Wallach. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Where  are  you  employed  ? 

Miss  Browx.  I  am  a  free-lance  musician. 

Mr.  Arexs.  What  instrument  do  you  play  ? 

Miss  Browx.  I  play  the  piano. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Do  you  also  instruct? 

Miss  Browx.  Yes ;  privately. 

Mr,  Arexs.  Do  you  have  any  connection  with  the  ^Metropolitan 
Music  School  ? 

Miss  Browx.  I  would  like  to  consult  my  counsel  on  this. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Browx.  For  some  length  of  time,  I  was  a  sponsor  of  the 
school. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Over  what  period  of  time  were  you  a  sponsor  of  the 
Metropolitan  Music  School? 

Miss  Browx'.  I  honestly  do  not  remember. 


706         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  is  your  best  recollection  as  to  the  approximate 
time,  the  ai^proximate  period? 

Miss  Brown.  Well,  I  think  I  must  have  been  approached  some 
time  in  the  194:0's,  and  I  have  never  made  any  request  to  have  the 
sponsorship  changed.  But  I  don't  even  know  at  this  point  whether 
I  am  still  publicly  listed  as  a  sponsor. 

Mr.  Aeens.  Are  you  now,  or  have  you  ever  been,  a  member  of  the 
Communist  Party  ? 

Miss  Brown.  I  decline  to  answer  under  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  taught  any  place,  at  any  institution? 

Miss  Brown.  I  would  like  to  consult  counsel  on  this. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Brown.  I  taught  for  a  brief  ])eriod  in  a  nuisic  school  on 
5th  Avenue  and  9th  Street.  I  believe  the  name  was  the  School  for 
Contemporary  INIusic.     I  was  substituting. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  have  you  ever  taught  at  the  Metropolitan  Music 
School  ? 

Miss  Brown.  No. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  taught  at  tlie  Jefferson  School  of 
Social  Science  ? 

Miss  Brown.  I  would  like  to  consult  counsel. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Brown.  I  decline  under  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  been  one  of  the  sponsors  of  tlie  "Save  the 
Rosenbergs"  connnittee? 

Miss  Brown.  I  would  like  to  consult  my  counsel  on  that,  please. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Brown.  I  don't  remember   whether  I  was  actually 

Mr.  Arens.  IMay  I  display  to  you  now,  if  you  please,  a  thermofax 
reproduction  of  an  article  which  appeared  in  the  Communist  Daily 
Worker — the  date  is  on  here — in  which  your  name  appears  as  one  of 
the  sponsors  in  the  musician  category  of  the  "Save  the  Rosenbergs" 
eiiter])rise. 

(The  document  was  handed  to  the  witness.) 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

INIr.  Arens.  Does  that  refresh  your  recollection  ? 

Miss  Brown.  Yes,  it  does,  and  I  would  like  to  say  that  I  am  proud 
to  identify  myself  among  the  people  wlio  were  on  that  committee. 

(Document  marked  "Brown  Exliibit  No.  1,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  a  member  of  the  National  Council  of  the 
Arts,  Sciences,  and  Professions  ? 

Miss  Brown.  I  would  like  to  consult  my  counsel  on  that. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Brown.  I  decline  inider  the  fifth  amendment. 

]Mr.  Arens.  I  display  to  you  now  a  thermofax  reproduction  of  a 
page  from  tlie  Communist  Daily  Worker  of  August  7,  1950,  in  which 
you  are  listed  as  one  of  the  signers  of  a  statement  issued  by  the 
National  Council  of  the  Arts,  Sciences,  and  Professions. 

Kindly  look  at  that  document  and  tell  this  committee  whether  or 
not  that  refreshes  your  recollection  and  whether  or  not  that  article 
accui'ately  describes  you. 

(The  document  was  handed  to  the  witness.) 

(The  witness  conferred  with  lier  counsel.) 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         707 

ISIiss  Browx.  I  decline  under  the  fifth  amendment. 

(Document  marked  "Brown  Exhibit  No.  2,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  AiJEXS.  Who  is  V.  J.  Jerome? 
jNIiss  Brown.  I  decline  under  the  fifth  amendment. 
Mr.  Arexs.  You  were  one  of  the  champions  of  V.  J.  Jerome  when 
he  Avas  being  tried  here  in  Foley  Square  back  in  1052;  were  you  not? 
Miss  Browx.  I  would  like  to  consult  counsel. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 
Miss  Browx.  I  decline  under  the  fifth  amendment. 
Mr.  Arexs.  I  display  to  you  now  a  thennofax  reproduction  of  the 
letter  from  the  Conuuittee'To  Defend  V.  J.  Jerome  for  intellectual 
and  cultural  freedom  [dated  April  14,  1952],  in  which  your  name 
appears  as  one  of  the  artists  who  are  listed  here  as  champions  of  the 
Culture  Fights  Back  Eally  tribute  to  V.  J.  Jerome. 

Kindly  look  at  that  document  and  tell  this  committee  whether  or 
not  you  can  verify  its  authenticity. 

(The  document  was  handed  to  the  witness.) 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Broavx.  I  decline  under  the  fifth  amendment. 

(Document  marked  "Brown  Exhibit  No.  3,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arexs.  "What  have  you  done  in  the  course  of  the  last  few  years 
toward  promotion  of  peace  in  the  Avorld?  Have  you  been  one  of  the 
promoters  of  peace? 

Miss  Browx.  I  would  like  to  consult  counsel,  please. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Brown.  I  have  been  too  busy  in  the  last  few  years,  if  that  is 
the  nature  of  the  question,  to  concern  myself. 

Mr.  Arexs.  I  would  just  like  to  invite  your  attention  to  a  thermofax 
reproduction  of  the  Communist  Daily  Worker  of  ]March  15,  1951,  in 
which  you  are  listed  as  one  of  the  sponsore  of  the  American  Peace 
CriLsade. 

Would  you  kindly  look  at  this  document  which  is  now^  being  dis- 
l)layed  to  you  and  see  if  that  refreshes  your  recollection? 

(The  docmnent  was  handed  to  the  witness.) 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Brown.  I  decline  under  the  fifth  amendment. 

(Document  marked  "Brown  Exhibit  No.  4,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arexs.  Were  you  in  the  recent  past,  or  the  last  few  years,  on  the 
committee  of  the  Metropolitan  ISIusic  School  which  awards  scholar- 
.ships  to  students? 

Miss  Browx.  I  would  like  to  consult  my  attorney, 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Browx.  Yes ;  I  was. 

Mr.  Arexs.  How  long  did  you  serve  on  the  scholarehip  awai'd  com- 
mittee of  the  Metropolitan  Music  School  ?     Do  you  recall  ? 

Miss  Browx.  For  one  session. 

Mr,  Arexs.  And  did  you  vote  to  make  awards  to  students  ? 

MissBRow'x.  I  did. 

JNIr.  Arexs.  While  you  were  operating  in  that  capacity,  Avere  you  also 
a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  at  that  time  ? 


708         COMMUNISM    IN   METROPOLITAN   MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

Miss  Brown.  I  decline  to  ans^Yer  under  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Aeens.  Have  you  been  a  member  of  the  Civil  Rights  Con- 
gress, or  have  you  been  active  in  the  affairs  of  the  Civil  Rights 
Congress  ? 

Miss  Brown.  I  would  like  to  consult  my  attorney. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Brown.  I  decline  to  answer  under  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  want  to  display  to  you  now  a  thermofax  reproduction 
of  an  article  in  the  Communist  Daily  Worker  [June  6,  1949,  p.  2], 
in  which,  according  to  the  article,  a  number  of  notables  are  blasting 
or  branding  Judge  Medina's  jailing  of  the  11  Communist  leaders, 
under  the  auspices — at  least  the  article  says  the  blasting  is  being  done 
under  the  auspices — of  the  Civil  Rights  Congress,  and  it  bears  the 
signatures  of  a  number  of  persons,  including  Lucy  Brown. 

Kindly  look  at  that  document  that  is  being  displayed  to  you  and 
see  if  that  refreshes  your  recollection  with  reference  to  your  partici- 
pation in  that  enterprise. 

(The  document  was  handed  to  the  witness.) 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Brown.  I  decline  to  answer  under  the  fifth  amendment. 

(Document  marked  'Brown  Exhibit  No.  5,"  and  retained  in 
committee  files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  a  ]\rarxist  ? 

Miss  Brown.  I  would  like  to  consult  counsel,  please. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Brown.  I  don't  wish  to  discuss  my  politics  witli  this  com- 
mittee. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  the  witness  be 
ordered  and  directed  to  answer  that  question. 

Mr.  Doyle.  You  are  ordered  and  directed  to  answer  the  question, 
Witness. 

Miss  Brown.  I  decline  to  answer  under  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  display  a  copy  of  the  March  12,  1953,  Communist 
Daily  Worker  in  which  a  number  of  people — according  to  the  article, 
400 — had  a  dinner  here  in  New  York  City,  on  the  right  to  learn 
IMarxism,  and  a  number  of  people  are  characterized  as  leading 
Marxists. 

In  the  concert  which  accompanied  the  affair,  or  the  entertainment  of 
the  affair,  Miss  Lucy  Brown  is  listed  as  one  of  the  participants  and 
one  of  the  artists  who  entertained  at  the  affair. 

Kindly  look  at  that  and  see  if  that  refreshes  your  recollection. 

(The  document  was  handed  to  the  witness.) 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Brown.  I  decline  to  answer  under  the  fifth  amendment. 

(Document  marked  "Brown  Exhibit  No.  6"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files. ) 

Mr.  Doyle.  Counsel,  may  I  ask  a  question  ? 

Will  you  make  a  statement  briefly  as  to  the  connection  of  Marxism 
with  Soviet  Communism?  Why  is  that  question  pertinent,  as  long 
as  the  witness  answered  that  she  did  not  care  to  discuss  political  affili- 
ations ? 

Mr.  Arens.  The  pertinency  is  that  the  Jefferson  School  of  Social 
Science  has  long  been  one  of  the  nests  of  Communist  activity  in  the 
United  States. 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN   MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         709 

Enumatino-  from  tluit  has  been  the  theoretical  ideological  basis 
upon  which  the  Communist  conspiracy  in  this  country  has  been  oper- 
ating, that  the  Communist  dynamics  stem  from  the  ideolog-y  of  Marx- 
ism. It  is  to  communism  what  the  Bible  is  to  Christianity,  I  should 
say. 

The  Jefferson  School  of  Social  Science,  in  this  particular  instance, 
was  the  institution  in  Avhich  this  affair  was  held.  Also,  in  the  dia- 
lectics of  connnunism,  Communists  frequently  allude  to  themselves 
not  as  Connnunists  but  as  Marxists;  and  they  also  allude  to  them- 
selves in  such  terminology  as  "Socialists,"  "Progressives,"  and  the 
like.  They  will  masquerade  behind  that.  It  is  for  that  reason  that 
the  question,  in  my  opinion,  is  pertinent  to  this  inquiry. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Thank  you. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  entertained  at  chapter  meetings  of  the  Na- 
tional Lawyers  Guild  ? 

Miss  Brown.  I  would  like  to  consult  counsel. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Browx.  I  appeared  mider  their  auspices  as  an  artist. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  been  connected  with  People's  Artists,  Inc.  ? 

Miss  Brown.  I  would  like  to  consult  counsel. 

(The  witness  conferred  witli  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Brown.  I  decline  to  answer  under  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  lay  before  you  now  a  thermofax  reproduction  of  the 
Communist  Daily  Worker  of  October  6,  1949,  bearing  an  article, 
"People's  Artists  Organize  New  Kind  of  Music  Series." 

According  to  the  article,  Paul  Robeson  entertained  at  this  Peekskill 
concert  under  the  auspices  of  People's  Artists,  Inc.;  and  one  of  the 
participants  in  their  programs  is  listed  here  as  Lucy  Brown,  concert 
pianist. 

(The  document  was  handed  to  the  witness.) 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Brown.  I  decline  to  answer  under  the  fifth  amendment. 

(Document  marked  "Brown  Exhibit  No.  T,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files. ) 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  been  one  of  the  sponsors  of  the  American 
Women  for  Peace  ^  Do  you  recall  your  sponsorship  of  that  enter- 
prise back  in  1950  ? 

Miss  Brown.  I  would  like  to  consult  my  counsel. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  comisel.) 

Miss  Brown.  I  decline  mider  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  display  to  you  now,  if  you  please,  a  thermofax  repro- 
duction of  a  bulletin  issued  by  that  organization,  in  which  you  are 
listed  as  one  of  the  sponsors — one  of  about  a  dozen  sponsors — of  that 
organization. 

(The  document  was  handed  to  the  witness.) 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Mr.  Arens.  I  ask  you  wliether  or  not  that  accurately  and  truth- 
fully describes  your  status  in  connection  with  that  organization? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Brown.  I  decline  under  the  fifth  amendment. 

(Document  marked  "Brown  Exhibit  No.  8,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Who  were  the  Warsaw  Ghetto  Fighters? 

Miss  Brown.  I  would  like  to  consult  with  counsel. 


710         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Brown.  I  don't  know  to  what  you  refer.  If  you  have  a  docu- 
ment to  shoAV  me  to  refresh  my  recollection,  I— — 

Mr.  Arens.  Yes,  I  would  be  glad  to  refresh  your  recollection.  I 
have  here  a  handbill,  entitled  "A  Tribute  to  the  Warsaw  Ghetto 
Fighters,"  back  in  1952,  in  which  a  number  of  people,  outstanding 
speakers  and  artists,  are  paying  tribute  to  the  Ghetto  Fightei-s  in 
Warsaw.    This  was  presented  by  Jewish  Life. 

Kindly  look  at  tliis  document  and  see  if  it  refreshes  your  recollec- 
tion with  reference  to  identification  or  connection  with  that  enter- 
prise. 

(The  document  was  handed  to  the  witness.) 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Brown.  I  remember  now  what  this  refere  to,  and  I  would 
like  to  say  that  I  was  very  proud  to  be  associated  with  an  affair  which 
was  dedicated  to  the  Jewish  fighters  that  fought  the  Nazis. 

(Document  marked  "Brown  Exhibit  No.  9,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  That  was  in  what  year,  please? 

Miss  Brown.  I  don't  remember  any  more.  You  will  have  to  bring 
it  back  to  me. 

Mr.  Arens.  Well,  the  document  will  speak  for  itself. 

Who  is  Harry  Bridges? 

Miss  Brown.  I  would  like  to  consult  counsel. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Brown.  As  I  recall,  Harry  Bridges  is  a  trade  union  leader 
on  the  west  coast. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  anything  else  about  him? 

Miss  Brown.  Yes.  I  know  that  he  was  many  times  threatened  with 
deportation. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  him  personally? 

Miss  Brown.  I  would  like  to  consult  counsel. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Brow^n.  I  never  met  him. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  he  is  a  Comnuuiist? 

Miss  Brown.  I  would  like  to  consult  counsel. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Brown.  I  don't  know. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  were  a  sponsor  of  a  Citizens'  Victory  Committee 
for  PTarry  Bridges,  were  you  not  ? 

Miss  Brown.  I  was. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  will  con- 
clude the  staff  interrogation  of  this  witness. 

Mr,  Doyle.  Have  you  any  questions,  Mr.  Frazier? 

Mr.  Frazier.  No  questions. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Mr.  Kearney  ? 

Mr.  Kearney.  I  have  no  questions. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Mr.  Mcintosh? 

Mr.  McIntosii.  I  have  no  questions. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Mr.  Counsel,  you  have  identified  this  witness  as  having 
had  some  connection  with  several  organizations.  I  think  it  pertinent, 
therefore,  that  the  record  show  what  some  of  these  organizations  are, 
according  to  the  Guide  to  Subversive  Organizations  and  Publications, 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         711 

published  as  of  January  2,  1957,  by  the  Committee  on  Un-American 
Activities,  House  of  Representatives. 

Mr.  Needleman.  Is  the  witness  excused,  Mr.  Chairman  ? 

Mr.  Doyle.  Not  quite  yet.    I  may  want  to  ask  her  a  question. 

The  American  Peace  Crusade,  for  instance,  on  page  13  of  this  book- 
let, was  organized  in  January  1951,  witli  national  headquarters  at 
1186  Broadway,  New  York,  and— 

1.  Cited  as  an  organization  which  "the  Communists  established"  as  "a  new 
instrument  for  tlieir  "poaee'  offensive  in  the  United  States,"  and  which  was 
heralded  by  the  Daily  Worker  "with  the  usual  bold  headlines  reserved  for  proj- 
ects in  line  with  the  Communist  objectives." 

2.  "As  part  of  Soviet  psychological  warfare  against  the  United  States,  Com- 
munist fronts  seek  to  paralyze  America's  will  to  resist  Communist  aggression 
by  idealizing  Russia's  aims  and  methods,  discrediting  the  United  States,  spread- 
ing defeatism  and  demoralization  *  *  *  specializing  in  this  field  *  *  *  have 
been  such  organizations  as  the  American  Peace  Crusade." 

And  the  American  Peace  Crusade  (during  Stalin-Hitler  pact)  on 
page  14,  is : 

Cited  as  "a  Communist  front  later  merged  into  the  American  Peace  Mobiliza- 
tion," and  as  the  "California  section  of  the  American  Peace  Mobilization." 

Now,  as  to  the  American  Women  for  Peace,  in  the  same  book  that 
I  have  referred  to,  on  page  18 : 

1.  Cited  as  "an  advance  wave  to  establish  a  beachhead  for  other  leftwing 
organizations  scheduled  to  descend  on  Washington  in  observance  of  a  Commu- 
nist-declared "I'eace  Week"." 

Referring  to  the  same  book,  on  page  25  thereof,  as  to  the  Civil 
Rights  Congress : 

1.  Cited  as  subversive  and  Communist  (Attorney  General  Tom  Clark). 

2.  Cited  as  an  organization  formed  at  a  Congress  on  Civil  Rights  held  in 
Detroit  in  April  104(j  as  a  merger  of  two  other  Communist-front  organizations. 
(  International  Labor  Defense  and  the  National  Federation  of  Constitutional 
Liberties)  ;  it  was  "dedicated  not  to  the  broader  issues  of  civil  liberties,  but 
specitically  to  the  defense  of  individual  Communists  and  the  Communist  Party" 
and  "controlled  by  individuals  who  are  either  members  of  the  Communist  Party 
or  openly  loyal  to  it." 

Pi.  "To  defend  the  cases  of  Communist  lawbreakers,  fronts  have  been  devised 
making  special  ai)peals  in  bebalf  of  civil  liberties  and  reaching  out  far  beyond 
tlie  confines  of  the  Comnninist  Party  itself.  Among  these  organizations  is  the 
Civil  Rights  Congress.  When  the  Communist  Party  itself  is  under  fire  these 
fronts  offer  a  bulwark  of  protection." 

Referring  to  the  National  Council  of  Arts,  Sciences,  and  Profes- 
sions, on  pages  61  and  62  of  tliis  same  booklet : 

1.  Cited  as  a  Communist  front.  (Committee  on  Un-American  Activities, 
House  Report  19-54  *  *  *.) 

2.  Cited  as  a  Communist  front  which  is  "used  to  appeal  to  special  occupa- 
tional groups  *  *  *."  (Internal  Security  Subcommittee  of  the  Senate  Judiciary 
''nnunittee). 

I  tliought  it  was  pertinent,  in  view  of  the  questions  and  answers  of 
the  witness,  that  the  record  have  tliis  chronological  record  at  this 
j)oint  in  the  record. 

Thank  you.  Witness. 

If  there  is  nothing  further,  you  are  excused. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Mildred  Hagler,  kindly  come  forward. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Do  you  solemnly  swear  to  tell  the  liiilh,  the  whole 
truth,  and  nothing  l)ut  the  truth,  so  help  you  God  ? 

Miss  Hagi.er.  I  do. 


712         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

TESTIMONY  OF  MILDRED  HAGLER,  ACCOMPANIED  BY  COUNSEL, 
ISIDORE  G.  NEEDLEMAN 

Mr.  Arens.  Kindly  identify  yourself  by  name,  residence,  and  occu- 
pation. 

Miss  Hagler.  Mildred  Hauler,  334  East  94th  Street. 

Mr.  Kearney.  Will  the  witness  speak  up?     I  cannot  hear  her. 

Miss  Hagler.  334  East  94th  Street,  New  York  28.    I  am  a  typist. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  appearino-  today  in  response  to  a  subpena 
which  was  served  upon  you  by  the  House  Committee  on  Un-American 
Activities? 

Miss  Hagler.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  you  are  represented  by  counsel  ? 

Miss  Hagler.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  Counsel,  kindly  identify  yourself. 

Mr.  Needleman.  Isidore  Needleman,  165  Broadway,  New  York  6, 
N.  Y. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  your  name  "Miss"  Hagler? 

Miss  Hagler.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  a  person  by  the  name  of  Leonard  Cherlin? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Hagler.  I  respectfully  decline  under  the  fifth  amendment  of 
the  Constitution. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  honestly  feel.  Miss  Hagler,  that  if  you  told  this 
committee  truthfully  whether  or  not  you  know  a  person  by  the  name 
of  Leonard  Cherlin,  you  would  be  supplying  information  which  might 
be  used  against  you  in  a  criminal  proceeding? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Hagler,  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Cherlin  yesterday  took  an  oath  before  this  com- 
mittee, laid  his  liberty  on  the  line — if  he  lied,  he  will  be  subject  to 
criminal  prosecution  for  perjury — and  while  he  was  under  oath,  he 
said  that  while  he  was  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  he  knew 
you  as  a  Communist.  Was  Mr.  Cherlin  lying  to  this  committee  or 
was  he  telling  the  truth  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Hagler.  I  respectfully  decline  under  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  a  person  by  the  name  of  Thelma  Pyle? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Hagler.  I  respectfully  decline  under  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  was  the  name  of  the  lady  who  just  preceded  you 
to  the  witness  stand  ?    Do  you  know  her  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Hagler.  I  respectfully  decline. 

Mr.  Arens.  Wliere  are  you  employed  ? 

Mr.  Needleman.  I  would  like  to  have  the  record  show  that  when 
she  declines,  it  is  on  the  same  ground.    She  didn't  finish  the  answer. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  beg  your  pardon.    Finish  your  answer,  if  you  please. 

Miss  Hagler.  I  respectfully  decline  under  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  ^Vliere  are  you  employed  ? 

Miss  Hagler.  I  am  not  employed  at  present. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  were  you  last  employed  ? 

Miss  LLagler.  I  am  a  free-lance  typist,  and  I  w^as  last  employed 
by  I.  G.  Needleman. 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         713 

Mr.  Arens.  Who  is  I.  G.  Needleman  ? 

Miss  Hagler.  My  counsel.    I  typed  something  for  him. 

Mr,  Arens.  Have  you  ever  been  employed  or  associated  in  any 
capacity  with  the  Metropolitan  Music  School  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Hagler.  I  was  employed  by  the  Metropolitan  Music  School  as 
a  typist  and  secretary. 

Mr.  Arens.  Over  what  period  of  time  ? 

Miss  Hagler.  I  don't  remember  exactly.  It  was  rouohly  about 
4  years. 

Mr.  Arens.  When  did  the  employment  begin,  rougldy  speaking? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  lier  counsel.) 

Miss  Hagler.  Around  1949. 

Mr.  Arens.  For  4  yeai*s  beginning  in  1949  ? 

]\Iiss  Hagler.  Yes,  more  or  less.     Approximately  that. 

Mr.  Arens.  For  whom  were  you  a  secretary  ? 

Miss  Hagler.  I  was  secretary  for  the  Metropolitan  Music  School. 

Mr.  Arens.  Who  was  it  gave  you  dictation?  Wio  dictated  the 
letters  to  you  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Hagler.  Well,  actually  I  didn't  take  any  dictation  per  se. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  were  your  duties  ? 

Miss  Hagler.  I  made  the  payroll,  I  typed  things  up.  It  did  not 
necessarily  include  dictation. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  keep  the  books  for  the  Metropolitan  Music 
School,  the  financial  records? 

Miss  Hagler.  No. 

Mr.  Arens.  Those  were  kept  by  the  treasurer,  I  take  it? 

Miss  Hagler.  No  doubt. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  were  you  employed  immediately  prior  to  your 
employment  with  the  Metropolitan  Music  School  ? 

Miss  Hagler.  I  don't  recall. 

Mr.  Arens.  Was  your  employment  with  the  Metropolitan  Music 
School  facilitated,  or  obtained  for  you,  by  any  person  known  by  you 
to  have  been  a  Communist? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Hagler.  Certainly  not. 

Mr.  Arens.  Who  hired  you  as  secretary  at  the  Metropolitan  iSIusic 
School  ? 

Miss.  Hagler.  I  don't  recall. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  employed  by  Lilly  Popper? 

(The  ^vitness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Hagler.  I  don't  recall  if  I  was  directly  hired  by  IVIiss  Popper. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  know  Miss  Popper  prior  to  tlie  time  that  you 
became  an  employee  of  the  Metropolitan  Music  School ;' 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Hagler.  No. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  recall  the  circumstances  concerning  your  em- 
ployment, how  you  happened  to  know  there  was  a  jNIetropolitan  Music 
School  at  which  you  might  find  a  job  ? 

Miss  Hagler.  No  ;  I  don't  recall. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  precipitated  your  disassoeiation  from  the  Metro- 
politan Music  School  ? 

91198— 57— pt.  1 8 


714         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Hagler.  Well,  I  finally  decided  that  I  had  to  liave  full-time 
work. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  then  where  did  you  work? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  PLvGLER.  I  respectfully  decline  to  answer  that  under  the  fifth 
amendment. 

Mr.  Arexs.  How  long  was  your  employment  in  the  job  that  you 
assumed  innnediately  after  your  disassociation  from  the  AIetro])olitan 
Music  School  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  IIaoler.  I  don't  recall. 

Mr.  Arens.  Was  it  a  matter  of  a  yeari* 

Miss  Hagler.  Yes. 

Mv.  Arens.  Was  it  a  matter  of  more  than  a  year? 

Miss  Ha(jler.  It  could  be.     I  don't  recall. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  was  the  oeooraphical  location  of  your  employ- 
ment ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Hagler.  It  was  in  the  midtown  area;  Manhattan. 

JNIr,  Arens.  Was  it  for  a  Communist  organization? 

Miss  Hagler.  1  decline  to  answer  on  the  lifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  couldn't  hear  you,  ma'am. 

Miss  Hagler.  1  beg  your  pardon.  I  respectfully  decline  under  the 
fifth  amendment. 

Mv.  Arens.  When  did  this  emj^loyment  begin?     In   what    year? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Hagler.  Some  time  in  195-). 

Mr.  Arens.  When  did  it  terminate? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Hagler.  1955  or  1954. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  honestly  feel  that  if  you  told  this  connnittee 
truthfully  where  you  were  employed,  you  woidd  be  supplying  informa- 
tion wliich  might  be  used  against  you  in  a  criminal  ]uoceeding? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

JNIiss  Ha(;ler.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  was  your  next  employment  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Hagler.  After  that  T  was  employed  at  the  Terminal  Letter 
Co. 

Mr.  Arens.  For  how  long? 

Miss  Hagler.  Ivoughly  a  year  and  a  half. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  your  next  em])loyment,  if  you  please? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Ha(;ler.  That  was  JNIorse  Associates. 

Ml".  Arens.  Just  a  word  about  the  organization.  What  is  the 
nature  of  the  work? 

Miss  Hagler.  It  is  similar  to  a  letter  shop. 

Ml'.  Arens.  How  long  did  that  employment  last? 

Miss  Hagler.  That  was  about  a  month  and  a  half. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  then  your  next  employment? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  HA<iLER.  I  didn't  work  again  after  that.  I  decided  to  go  to 
school. 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         715 

Mr.  Arkns.  Where  did  you  <>:o  to  school  i 

Miss  IIaglek.  In  niidtown;  Manliattaii. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  is  the  name  of  the  institut  ion  you  attended  'i 

Miss  Hagler.  Ralph  Coxhead. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  is  the  nature  of  the  organization  ? 

Miss  ILvGLi'^R.  It  is  a  new  kind  of  office  machine. 

Mr.  Arens.  Hoay  lono;  did  you  attend  this  institution,  this  school? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Aliss  Hagler.  I  have  been  there  about  a  week. 

Mr.  Arens.  Then  your  next  activity?  What  did  you  do  after  you 
concluded  your  week's  service  in  the  school  ? 

Miss  Hagler.  This  brings  me  up  to  date. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have. you  ever  been  a  member  of  the  teachei's'  union? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Hagler.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  have  knowledge  as  to  the  number  of  members 
of  the  faculty  of  the  Metroi)olitan  Music  School  who  arc  or  have  been 
members  of  the  teachers'  union  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Hagler.  Mr.  Arens,  please,  I  have  been  away  from  the  Metro- 
politan Music  School  since  about  June  1953. 

Mr.  Arens.  When  you  were  connected  with  the  Metropolitan  Music 
School  in  June  1953,  w'ere  you  a  member  of  the  teachers'  union  ? 

Miss  Hagler.  At  that  time,  yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  the  other  teachers  belong  to  the  teachers'  union, 
the  other  instructors  at  the  ]\Ietropolitan  Music  School  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Hagler.  Yes ;  I  believe  so. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  instructed,  yourself  ? 

Miss  Hagler.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  did  you  teach  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Hagler.  I  instructed  at  the  Metropolitan  Music  School. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  that  period  of  instruction  coincide  with  your  tenure 
there  as  secretary  ? 

Miss  Hagler.  To  the  best  of  my  recollection,  yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  else  have  you  instructed  ? 

Miss  IL\GLER.  Well,  my  teaching  has  been  very,  very,  very  limited. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  teach  at  the  New  York  Band  &  Instrument  Co.  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Hagler.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  W^hen? 

Miss  Hagler.  I  dont'  remember. 

Mr.  Arens.  How  long  ago  was  it  ?     Was  it  10  years  ago  ? 

Miss  Hagler.  I  would  think  so. 

JNIr.  Arens.  Are  you  now,  this  minute,  a  Communist  ? 

Miss  Hagler.  I  respectfully  decline  to  answer  this  under  the  fifth 
amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  will  conclude 
the  staff  interrogation  of  this  witness. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Ha\e you  any  questions,  ]\Ir.  Frazier ? 

Mr.  Frazier.  No  questions. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Mr.  Kearney? 

Mr.  Kearney.  No  questions. 


716         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Mr.  Mcintosh? 

Mr.  McIntosh.  I  have  no  questions. 

Mr.  Doyle.  I  do  not  have  any  questions ;  but  while  the  witness  is 
here,  I  want  to  call  to  the  attention  of  the  committee  and  the  record 
a  brief  paragraph  appearing  in  the  New  York  Times  this  morning. 
1  read  it  into  the  record  at  this  time  because  yesterday  some  of  the 
witnesses  claimed  that  this  committee  was  exceeding  its  jurisdiction 
in  the  questions  we  were  asking  of  witnesses  as  to  whom  they  knew 
as  Communists,  and  so  forth,  not  being  pertinent.  I  read  this  news 
item : 

Newsman  Guilty  in  Contempt  Case 

Washington,  April  9. — Aklen  Whitman,  a  copy  editor  *  *  *  was  convicted 
today  of  contempt  of  Congress.  .Judse  Edward  M.  Curran,  who  heard  the  case 
without  a  jury  in  Federal  district  court,  found  Mr.  Whitman  guilty  on  all  19 
counts  of  an  indictment  returned  last  November  26.  Mr.  Whitman  refused  at 
a  Senate  Internal  Security  Subcommittee  hearing  on  January  6,  1956,  to  name 
persons  he  had  known  as  Communists  during  the  time  he  was  a  member  of 
the  Communist  Party.  He  testified  that  he  had  been  a  party  member  from 
1935  to  1948  in  Bridgeport,  Conn.,  and  Buffalo  and  New  York.  *  *  * 

Judge  Curran  permitted  Mr.  Whitman  to  tell  why  he  had  refused  to  answer 
the  subcommittee's  questions.  He  said  that  to  have  answered  would  have  cast 
him  in  the  role  of  an  informer  and  would  have  been  repugnant  to  his  self- 
respect.  *  *  * 

Judge  Curran  held  that  a  congressional  inquiry  as  to  the  number  of  Com- 
munists and  who  they  were,  and  the  growth  and  extent  of  the  Communist  move- 
ment in  this  country,  was  pertinent  to  a  valid  legislative  purpose. 

The  questions  asked  Mr.  Whitman  [by  the  committee]  he  held  were  relevant 
to  that  purpose. 

I  have  not  read  the  full  text  of  the  article,  and  for  purposes  of 
brevity  I  ask  that  only  the  portion  I  have  read  go  into  the  record. 

(At  this  point  Representatives  Robert  J.  Mcintosh  and  Bernard 
W.  Kearney  left  the  hearing  room.) 

Mr.  Doyle.  We  will  have  a  recess  for  5  minutes  at  this  point. 

(A  short  recess  was  taken.  Committee  members  present:  Repre- 
sentatives Clyde  Doyle  and  James  B.  Frazier,  Jr.) 

(At  the  expiration  of  the  recess,  the  subcommittee  reconvened  with 
the  following  members  present :  Representatives  Clyde  Doyle,  James 
B.  Frazier,  Jr.,  Bernard  W.  Kearney,  and  Robert  J.  Mcintosh.) 

Mr.  Doyle.  The  subcommittee  will  please  reconvene. 

Let  the  record  show  that  Messrs.  Frazier,  Kearney,  Mcintosh,  and 
Doyle  are  present.     Therefore,  we  will  proceed. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Frank  Schwartz,  kindly  come  forward. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Do  you  solemnly  swear  to  tell  the  truth,  the  whole 
truth,  and  nothing  but  the  truth,  so  help  you  God? 

Mr.  Schwartz.  I  do. 

TESTIMONY  OF  FEANK  SCHWARTZ,  ACCOMPANIED  BY  COUNSEL, 

FRANK  SCHEINER 

Mr.  Arens.  Kindly  identify  yourself  by  name,  residence,  and 
occupation. 

Mr.  Schwartz.  My  name  is  Frank  Schwartz.  My  address  is  21-25 
34th  Avenue,  Long  Island  City,  N.  Y.  As  to  my  occupation,  I  re- 
spectfully decline  to  answer.    In  declining  to  answer 

Mr.  Arens.  Excuse  me  just  a  moment.  Are  you  reading  from  a 
statement  ? 

Mr.  Schwartz.  I  am. 


COMIVIUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         717 

Mr.  Arexs.  Who  prepared  the  statement  ? 

Mr.  Schwartz.  I  did. 

Mr.  Arens.  Thank  you. 

Mr.  Schwartz.  As  to  my  occupation,  I  respectfully  decline  to  an- 
swer. In  declining  to  answer,  I  stand  on  each  and  every  right  and 
privilege  I  have  under  the  Constitution  of  the  United  States,  includ- 
ing my  rights  under  the  first  and  fifth  amendments,  and  my  right  not 
to  be  required  to  be  a  witness  against  myself. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  appearing  today  in  response  to  a  subpena 
which  was  served  upon  you  by  the  Plouse  Committee  on  Un-American 
Activities  ? 

Mr.  Schwartz,  I  am. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  represented  by  counsel  ? 

Mr.  Schwartz.  I  am. 

Mr.  Arens.  Counsel,  kindly  identify  yourself. 

Mr.  Scheiner.  Frank  Scheiner,  401  Broadway,  New  York  City, 
N.  Y. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  honestly  apprehend,  sir,  that  if  you  told  this 
committee  truthfully  what  your  occupation  is,  you  would  be  giving 
information  that  could  be  used  against  you  in  a  criminal  proceeding  ? 

Mr.  Schwartz,  I  stand  on  my  previous  answer, 

Mr.  Arens,  Mr,  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  the  witness  now 
be  ordered  and  directed  to  answer  the  last  outstanding  principal 
question, 

Mr,  Doyle,  You  are  ordered  and  directed  to  answer  the  last  ques- 
tion, Mr.  Witness.    We  cannot  accept  the  answer  you  gave. 

Mr.  Schwartz,  I  respectfully  decline  to  answer.  In  declining  to 
answer,  I  stand  on  each  and  every  right  I  have  under  the  Consti- 
tution of  the  United  States,  including  my  rights  under  the  first  and 
fifth  amendments,  and  my  right  not  to  be  a  witness  against  myself, 

Mr.  Arens.  So  that  we  may  be  absolutely  without  question  thor- 
oughly fair,  the  question  which  is  outstanding  on  this  record  is 
for  the  purpose  of  developing  facts  as  to  whether  or  not  your  in- 
vocation of  the  fifth  amendment  is  in  good  faith.  If  you  do  not 
honestly  apprehend  that  the  answer  to  the  preceding  principal  ques- 
tion would  give  information  which  might  be  used  against  you  in  a 
criminal  proceeding,  you  have  no  right  to  invoke  the  fifth  amend- 
ment. Therefore,  I  now  repeat  the  question,  so  there  will  be  no 
■question  about  it  on  tliis  record. 

Do  you  honestly  fear,  sir,  that  if  you  told  this  committee  what 
your  occupation  is,  you  would  be  supplying  information  which  might, 
directly  or  indirectly,  give  facts  which  could  be  used  against  you  in 
a  criminal  proceeding? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr,  Schwartz.  I  stand  on  my  ]:)revious  answer. 

Mr.  Arens.  Now,  Mr.  Chairman,  so  there  can  be  no  question  about 
the  status  of  this  record,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  the  record  again 
reflect  an  order  and  direction  to  the  witness  to  answer  this  question. 

Mr.  Doyle,  I  again  order  and  direct  you  to  answer  that  question.  I 
wish  to  state  this,  that  our  committee  counsel  is  not  undertaking  to  act 
as  legal  counsel  for  any  witness;  but  we  believe  that  our  committee 
counsel,  in  making  that  statement,  meant  it  to  be,  as  he  stated,  to  be 
fully  frank  and  fully  fair.  We  do  not  undertake  to  do  anj'thing  which 
deliberately  puts  any  person  in  contempt.     Therefore,  our  counsel  is 


718         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

going  out  of  his  way  to  give  the  benefit,  to  the  extent  to  which  it  is 
accepted  and  received,  of  the  position  we  take.  But  we  say  to  every 
witness,  "You  rely  on  your  own  counsel."  Our  committee  coun- 
sel is  not  in  a  position  to  legally  advise  you.  He  can  give  you  the 
best  information,  and  you  can  take  it  or  leave  it.  We  do  not  want 
anyone  left  in  a  position  where  they  are  in  contempt  without  knowing 
that  that  is  the  position. 

What  is  your  answer  to  the  question  ? 

Mr.  Schwartz.  I  would  like  to  consult  my  counsel  again. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Schwartz.  Would  you  repeat  the  question  directly  to  me  again, 
please? 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  honestly  fear,  sir,  that  if  you  told  this  commit- 
tee what  your  occupation  is,  where  you  are  employed,  you  would  be 
supplying  information  which  might,  directly  or  indirectly,  give  facts 
which  could  be  used  against  you  in  a  criminal  proceeding? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Schwartz.  Yes,  I  do. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  an  instructor  at  the  ISIetropolitan  Music 
School? 

]\Ir.  Schwartz.  I  would  like  consult  my  counsel. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Schwartz.  No,  I  am  not. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  been  an  instructor  at  the  Metropolitan 
Music  School  ? 

Mr.  Schwartz.  About  17  years  ago,  for  a  period  of  3  or  4  weeks, 
I  had  2  pupils,  to  the  best  of  my  recollection. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  would  like  to  have  you  help  us,  then. 

We  have  here  the  catalog  of  the  1950-57  ^letropolitan  Music  School. 
On  page  4  of  this  catalog  we  have  listed  here  the  bassoon,  and  the 
instructor  listed  for  the  bassoon  is  Frank  Schwartz. 

Kindly  look  at  that  catalog,  if  you  please,  and  tell  us  if  3'ou  can  help 
us  to  account  how  your  name  happens  to  appear  in  the  1956-57  catalog 
as  the  instructor  in  bassoon  if  you  have  not  instructed  there  for  the 
many  years  which  j'ou  referred  to  a  moment  ago. 

(The  document  was  handed  to  the  witness.) 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  comisel.) 

Mr.  Schwartz.  In  answer  to  this  question,  I  must  say  that  I  have 
never  given  a  lesson  on  bassoon  at  the  Metropolitan  Music  School  at 
any  time;  that  I  have  had  no  contact  wliatever  with  the  Metropolitan 
Music  School  for  many,  many  3'ears;  and  that  any  contact,  when  it  did 
exist,  lasted  for  a  period  of  several  weeks. 

I  told  you  I  had  2  pupils  at  that  time,  and  I  don't  think  I  gave  them 
more  than  5  or  6  lessons  all  told  between  the  2  pupils. 

(Document  marked  "Schwartz  Exhibit  No.  1,"  and  retained  in 
committee  files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  remonstrated  with  the  officials  of  the 
Metropolitan  Music  School  or  requested  them  to  cause  your  name  to 
be  removed  from  the  faculty  list  ? 

Mr.  Schwartz.  I  might  have  at  some  period  in  the  past,  but  not 
in  a  very,  very  serious  way.  In  other  words,  I  might  not  have  done 
it  as  strongly  as  I  could  have. 

Mr.  Arens.  Now,  I  display  to  you  the  1955-56  catalog  of  the  Metro- 
politan Music  School,  on  page  4  of  wliich  your  name  likewise  appears 
as  the  instructor  in  the  bassoon. 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         719 

(The  dociiinent  was  handed  to  the  witness.) 

(The  witness  conferred  with  liis  counseL) 

Mr.  Schwartz.  What  is  your  question,  please? 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  liave  knowledge  that  your  name  was  listed  as 
an  instructor  during  the  period  covered  by  the  catalog  which  is  now 
being  displayed  to  you  ? 

Mr.  Schwartz.  I  did  not. 

(Document  marked  "Schwartz  Exhibit  No.  2,"  and  retained  in 
committee  files.) 

Mr.  Arexs.  Now  that  you  know  that  your  name  is  listed  as  an 
instructor,  and  has  been  listed  for  some  time  as  an  instructor,  in  the 
Metropolitan  Music  School,  do  you  propose  to  cause  your  name  to  be 
removed,  to  take  such  steps  as  you  can  to  cause  it  to  be  removed  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  ScHw^vRTz,  I  haven't  had  an  opportunity  to  think  about  it.  I 
will  have  to  think  about  it  first. 

A[r.  Arexs.  Are  you  engaged  in  the  musical  profession  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Schwartz.  I  have  already  refused  to  answer  that  question. 

Mr.  Arex^s.  No  you  haven't.  You  just  said  you  wouldn't  tell  us 
your  specific  occupation.    Are  you  a  musician  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Schwartz.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  for  the  reasons 
I  have  already  given. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  the  witness  be 
ordered  and  directed  to  answer  that  question  because,  as  the  chairman 
has  said  in  the  opening  statement,  just  being  a  musician,  as  such, 
certainly  isn't  subversive. 

Mr.  Doyle.  You  are  directed  and  ordered  to  answer  the  question. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  a  musician  ? 

Mr.  Schwartz.  I  decline  to  answer  for  the  reasons  previously  given. 

Mr.  Arens.  The  record,  does  it  not,  Mr.  Chairman,  shows  an  order? 

Mr.  Doyle.  I  think  it  does. 

Mr.  ScHEiNER.  Isn't  it  a  fact  that  the  purpose  of  this  investigation 
is  to  inquire  into  subversion  and  connnumsm  amongst  nnisicians? 
Isn't  that  the  stated  purpose  of  this  investigation  ? 

Mr.  Doyle.  It  is  one  of  the  purposes,  yes,  so  stated — the  eft'ect  of 
Communist  infiltration  in  the  field  of  music,  with  special  reference 
to  that  infiltration  into  the  Metropolitan  Music  School  faculty,  if  any. 

Mr.  Arens,  How  long  have  you  enjoyed  your  present  occupation  or 
been  engaged  in  your  present  occupation  ? 

Mr.  Schwartz.  I  decline  to  answer  that  (juestion  for  reasons  pre- 
viously given. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  was  youi-  occupation  immediately  prior  to  your 
})resent  occupation  ? 

Mr.  ScHWA]{Tz.  I  decline  to  answer  for  the  reasons  previously  given. 

Mr.  Arens.  How  long  liave  you  been  engaged  in  your  present 
occupation  ? 

Mr.  Schwartz.  I  decline  to  answer  for  the  reasons  previously  given. 

Mr.  Arens.  How  long  were  you  engaged  in  the  occupation  imme- 
diately preceding  your  present  occupation  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  witli  liis  counsel.) 


720         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

Mr.  Schwartz.  I  have  never  given  any  indication  as  to  whether 
I  have  had  another  occuj)ation  or  any  occupation,  so  I  decline  to 
answer  that  question  for  the  same  reasons. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  and  when  were  you  born  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counseL) 

Mr.  Schwartz.  I  was  born  right  here  in  New  York  City  in  1913. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Where  did  you  go  to  school  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Schwartz.  I  will  answer  that  question  to  the  extent  that  it 
has  nothing  to  do  with  music.  I  had  the  usual  elementary  school  edu- 
cation, the  details  of  which  escape  me  for  the  moment.  I  suppose 
I  could  easily  find  out.  I  went  to  Brooklyn  Technical  High  School. 
Then  1  v,ent  to  Cooper  Union  Institute  of  Engineering. 

Mr.  Arens.  When  did  you  complete  your  courses  at  Cooper  Union 
Institute  of  Engineering  ? 

Mr.  Schwartz.  I  thinlv  possibly  1931  was  the  end  of  that  phase 
of  my  education. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  receive  a  degree  there  ? 

Mr.  Schwartz.  No,  I  did  not. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  attended  any  other  institutions  or  schools? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Schwartz.  I  must  decline  to  answer  that  question. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  the  witness  be 
ordered  and  directed  to  answer  that  question. 

Mr.  Doyle.  You  are  directed  and  ordered  to  answer  the  question, 
Witness. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Schwartz.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  for  the  reasons 
already  given. 

Mr.  Arens.  When  did  you  complete  your  formal  education  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel. ) 

Mr.  Schwartz.  Excuse  me.  I  am  a  little  confused  by  the  ques- 
tion. Would  you  explain  just  what  you  mean  by  "formal  education" 
in  this  sense  ?  Do  you  mean  continuing  a  course  of  study  to  the  point 
where  you  acquire  j^our  degree  or  graduate,  or  do  you  mean  some- 
thing else? 

Mr.  Arens.  When  did  you  complete  the  study  which  you  did  engage 
in,  looking  toward  a  complete  education  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Schwartz.  I  never  did  complete  such  an  education. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  study  did  you  take,  other  than  the  study  which 
you  have  thus  far  revealed  to  the  committee  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Schwartz.  It  seems  to  me  your  questions  are  pointing  in  the 
direction  of  whether  or  not  I  have  had  a  musical  education.  Isn't  that 
right  ?  If  that  is  so,  I  must  again  decline  to  answer  for  the  reasons 
previously  given,  because  I  have  already  declined  to  indicate  what  my 
occupation  is. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  a  person  by  the  name  of  Leonard  Cherlin  ? 

Mr.  Schwartz.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  for  i-easons  previ- 
ously given. 

Mr.  Arens.  Leonard  Cherlin  yesterday,  before  this  committee,  took 
an  oath ;  and  Avhile  he  was  under  oath,  he  testified  that  when  he  was 
a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  he  knew  you  as  a  Communist. 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         721 

Now,  while  you  are  under  oath,  tell  this  committee  was  Mr.  Cherlin 
lying  or  was  he  telling  the  truth  ? 

Mr.  Schwartz.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  for  the  reasons 
previously  given. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  is  your  position  with  reference  to  the  cultural 
exchange  program  between  the  United  States  and  the  Soviet  Union  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Schwartz.  I  am  afraid  you  will  have  to  clarify  that  for  me. 
I  don't  quite  understand  the  gist  of  the  question. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  taken  any  position  publicly  on  the  cultural 
exchange  programs  ? 

( The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel. ) 

Mr.  Schwartz.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  for  reasons  previ- 
ously given. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  have  here  a  public  declaration  by  a  number  of  people 
protesting  the  sending  of  a  ballet  to  Franco  Spain.  That  appeared 
in  the  Communist  Daily  Worker.  The  date  of  this  Daily  Worker 
is  April  8, 1952. 

It  bears,  according  to  the  article,  the  signatures  of  a  number  of 
people,  including  Frank  Schwartz.  Kindly  look  at  this  document, 
as  it  is  displayed  to  you,  and  tell  this  committee  whether  or  not  that 
refreshes  your  recollection  with  reference  to  your  position  of  sending 
the  ballet  to  Spain. 

(The  document  was  handed  to  the  witness.) 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Schwartz.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  for  reasons  previ- 
ously given. 

(Document  marked  "Schwartz  Exhibit  No.  3,"  and  retained  in 
committee  files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  ever  live  at  1268  New  York  Avenue,  Brooklyn  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel. ) 

Mr.  Schwartz.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  for  reasons  already 
given. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  the  witness  be 
ordered  and  directed  to  answer  that  question. 

Mr.  D()Ti.E.  You  are  directed  to  answer  the  question,  Mr,  Witness. 
I  believe  it  is  manifest  that,  for  the  purpose  of  identification,  as  well 
as  for  other  reasons,  the  question  is  pertinent. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Schwartz.  I  stand  on  my  previous  answer.  I  decline  to  answer 
for  reasons  already  given. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  was  your  first  employment  after  you  had  com- 
pleted the  formal  education  Avhich  you  did  receive  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel. ) 

Mr.  Schwartz.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  for  reasons  already 
given. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  was  the  succeeding  employment  after  your  first 
employment  ? 

Mr.  Schwartz.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  for  reasons  al- 
ready given. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  been  engaged  in  any  employment  during 
your  adulthood  concerning  which  you  can  tell  this  committee  with- 
out giving  information  that  might  be  used  against  you  in  a  criminal 
f)roceeding  ? 


722         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Schwartz.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  for  reasons  al- 
ready given. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Counsel,  did  I  not  hear  the  witness  volunteer  that 
about  17  years  ago  he  had  taught  2  or  3  or  -i  students  at  the  Metropoli- 
tan Music  School  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Yes,  sir,  and  I  intend  to  pursue  that  in  just  a  few 
minutes. 

Mr.  Doyle.  I  thought  that  was  an  occupation. 

Mr.  ScHEiNER.  Am  I  right  that  Mr.  Arens  was  asking  about  some 
previous  employment  and  that  you  are  constantly  trying  to  get  this 
witness  either  to  waive,  or  l)e  entrapped  into  answering,  the  question 
that  he  has  indicated  to  you  that  he  doesn't  want  to  answer,  and  he  has 
a  right  not  to  answer  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  We  are  not  intending  to  entrap  him, 

Mr.  ScHEiNER.  You  certainly  are.  He  has  made  it  clear  to  you 
that  there  is  a  line  on  which  he  will  not  answer.  I  think  that  is  en- 
trapment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Counsel  ought  to  be  advised  that  your  sole  and  ex- 
clusive right  is  to  advise  your  client. 

Mr.  Sciieiner.  I  am  advising  you  what  my  advice  is  to  my  client. 

Mr.  Doyle.  We  do  not  want  to  know  what  your  advice  to  your 
client  is.  That  is  your  professional  secret.  We  are  not  interested. 
If  we  had  been  trying  to  entrap  your  witness,  Mr.  Counsel,  we  would 
not  have  gone  out  of  our  way  to  inform  him  what  we  believe  the 
law  would  be.  So  please  confine  your  remarks  to  your  own  client 
hereafter. 

Mr.  Arens.  Now,  Mr.  Witness,  you  told  us  a  little  while  ago  that 
you  had  taught  for  a  brief  period  at  the  Metropolitan  Music  School ; 
is  that  correct? 

Mr.  Schwartz.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  course  did  you  teach  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mv.  Schwartz.  I  taught  no  courses.     I  had  two  private  pupils. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  did  you  teacli  the  two  private  pupils? 

Mr.  Schwartz.  This  I  nuist  decline  to  answer  for  reasons  previously 
given. 

Mv.  Arens.  Did  you  teach  them  some  musical  instrument  ? 

Mr.  Schwartz.  1  must  decline  to  answer  that  for  reasons  previous- 
ly given. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  the  witness  be 
ordered  and  directed  to  answer  the  question. 

Mr.  Doyle.  I  order  and  direct  you  to  answer  that  question,  JNIr. 
Witness.  You  have  alread}^  answered  it  in  part.  I  think  the  record 
will  show  you  gave  not  more  than  2  or  3  lessons  on  the  bassoon. 

Mr.  Schwartz.  I  am  sorry.    May  we  read  the  record  on  tliat  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Doyle.  I  may  be  in  error,  but  at  any  rate  I  think  the  record 
will  show  that  you  testiiied  that  you  had  not  more  than  2  or  3 
students  in  your  class. 

Mr.  Schwartz.  May  I  repeat  what  I  said? 

Mr.  Doyle.  Yes,  if  you  think  you  can. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         723 

Mr.  Schwartz.  Better  still,  may  I  request  that  that  answer  may 
be  read  from  the  record  'i 

Mr.  Arens.  It  will  be  too  difficult  to  read  it  back  now.  Many, 
many  pages  have  gone  by. 

You  have  told  us,  have  you  not,  that  you  taught  these  students 
privately,  via  the  Metropolitan  Music  School  ^ 

Mr.  ScirwARTz.  Yes,  I  did.     I  didn't  say  2  or  3;  I  said  2. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  didn't  teach  them  mathematics,  did  you? 

Mr.  Schwartz.  I  must  decline  to  answer  that  question. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  the  wit- 
ness be  ordered  and  directed  to  answer  the  question. 

]\Ir.  Doyle.  You  are  ordered  and  directed  to  answer  the  <iuestion, 
]Mr.  Witness. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  ScHW^vRTZ.  I  must  decline  to  answer  (liis  (luestion  lor  (he 
reasons  previously  given. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Where  was  the  physical  place  of  the  instruction^ 
Was  it  at  the  Metropolitan  Music  School  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Schwartz.  I  think  it  was,  but  I  am  not  certain, 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  paid  by  the  Metropolitan  Music  School  for 
your  instruction  of  these  students  ? 

Mr.  Schwartz.  I  was. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  who  solicited  you  to  instruct  the  students? 

Mr.  Schwartz.  I  can't  remember  that. 

Mr.  Arens.  Was  it  Miss  Lilly  Popper? 

Mr.  Schwartz.  I  can't  remember  that. 

Mr.  Arens.     You  know  Lilly  Popper,  do  you  not? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Schwartz.  I  shall  decline  to  answer  that  question  for  reasons 
previously  given,  and  I  must  indicate  that  I  wtII  continue  to  decline 
to  answer  any  question  having  to  do  witli  people  in  the  sense  that  I 
have  already  explained.    Shall  I  read  it  again  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Arens.  So  this  record  may  be  perfectly  clear,  because  I  tliink 
this  witness  is  under  a  misapprehension  here — Are  you  a  musician? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Schwartz.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  the  witness  be 
ordered  and  directed  to  answer  that  question,  I  think  this  is  a  repe- 
tition, but  I  want  the  record  to  be  absolutely  clear. 

Mr.  Doyle,  Let  us  have  the  record  clear,  I  direct  and  order  you 
to  answer  the  question. 

Mr.  Schwartz,  We  have  gone  over  that  ground  before ;  haven't  w^e  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  I  respectfully  suggest  that  will  conclude  the  staff  in- 
terrogation of  this  witness. 

Mr.  Schwartz.  I  must  stand  on  my  previous  answer. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Mr.  Frazier,  any  questions? 

Mr.  Frazier.  INIr,  Schwartz,  are  you  now  a  member  of  the  Conunu- 
ni St  Party? 

Mr.  Schwartz.  I  must  decline  to  answer  that  question  for  the  rea- 
sons previously  given. 

Mr.  Frazier.  Were  you  ever  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party? 


724         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

Mr.  Schwartz.  I  repeat  my  answer.  I  decline  to  answer  for  rea- 
sons previously  given. 

Mr,  Doyle.  Mr.  Kearney? 

Mr.  Kearney.  No  questions. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Mr.  INIcIntosh  ? 

Mr.  McIntosh.  I  have  no  questions. 

Mr.  Doyle.  I  wish  to  state  this  for  the  benefit  of  counsel  and  the 
witness.  We  take  the  position  that  this  committee  of  Congress,  under 
court  decisions  and  under  Public  Law  601,  is  under  an  obligation  to 
go  into  the  field  to  see  the  extent  of  Communist  subversion  or  Com- 
munist infiltration  in  any  area,  even  including  music. 

We  are  not  investigating  music  here,  as  you  well  know,  and  have  no 
intention  so  to  do.  But  we  do  feel  that  under  the  law.  Public  Law  601, 
under  which  we  are  operating,  and  as  directed  by  Congress,  we  are 
imder  an  obligation  to  investigate  the  infiltration  of  subversive  com- 
munism, even  though  it  is  on  the  part  of  musicians,  in  the  field  of 
music,  or  any  other  field. 

I  just  want  to  make  that  statement  for  the  record  again,  so  that  there 
will  be  no  misapprehension. 

Mr.  Kearney.  According  to  the  witness'  testimony,  Mr.  Chairman, 
we  do  not  know  whether  he  is  a  musician  or  not. 

Mr.  Doyle.  At  least  he  was  17  years  ago  for  a  few  minutes,  when 
he  taught  and  was  paid  by  the  ^letropolitan  Music  School  for  those 
2  students. 

Are  there  any  other  questions?  If  not,  the  witness  is  excused  at 
this  time. 

Mr.  Schwartz.  Before  I  step  down,  Mr.  Chairman 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  the  next  witness 
will  be  Mr.  David  Walter. 

Mr.  Schwartz.  May  I  address  a  question  to  the  chairman  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Walter,  will  you  please  come  forward  ? 

Mr.  Doyle.  No.     The  witness  is  excused. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr,  Walter,  please  come  forward  and  be  sworn. 

Mr.  ScHEiNER.  May  the  record  show  that  the  witness  had  a  request 
to  make  of  the  chairman,  but  he  has  not  been  given  an  opportunity  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Kindly  raise  your  hand  while  the  chairman  administers 
the  oath,  please. 

Mr.  Schwartz.  May  I  submit  this  to  you  in  written  form  ? 

Mr.  Doyle.  Without  any  assurance  that  it  will  be  filed.  We  are  not 
going  to  file  anything  in  the  record  that  we  have  not  had  time  to  con- 
sider. I  do  not  see  why  you  could  not  make  your  statement  when  you 
were  on  the  stand. 

Mr.  Schwartz.  This  has  to  do  with  the  transcript  of  the  testi- 
mony.   I  would  like  to  have  an  opportunity  to  present 

Mr.  Frazier.  You  read  it  time  and  again ;  did  you  not  ? 

Mr.  Schwartz.  No  ;  I  did  not. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Hand  it  to  our  counsel,  then,  if  it  is  something  involving 
the  transcript. 

Mr.  ScHEiNER.  You  can  offer  this  as — — 

Mr.  Doyle.  Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  you  will  tell  the  truth,  the 
whole  truth,  and  nothing  but  the  truth,  so  help  you  God  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  I  do. 


COMMUNISM   IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         725 

TESTIMONY  OF  DAVID  WAITER,  ACCOMPANIED  BY  COUNSEL, 
OSMOND  K.  PRAENKEL 

Mr.  Arens.  Kindly  identify  yourself  by  name,  address,  and  occu- 
pation. 

Mr.  Walter.  David  Walter,  21-35  34tli  Avenue,  Long  Island  City, 
N.Y. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  your  occupation  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  I  am  a  musician. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  appearing  today,  Mr.  Walter,  in  response  to 
a  subpena  served  upon  you  by  the  House  Committee  on  Un-Ajnerican 
Activities  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  Yes ;  I  am,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  represented  by  counsel  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Counsel,  kindly  identify  yourself. 

Mr.  Fraenkel.  Osmond  K.  Fraenkel,  120  Broadway,  New  York  25. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  are  you  employed  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  I  am  a  free-lance  musician,  and  am  employed  in  very 
many  places. 

Mr.  Arens.  Give  us,  if  you  please,  a  thumbnail  sketch  of  the  prin- 
cipal employments  you  have  had  over  the  course  of  the  last  year  or  two. 

Mr.  Walter.  My  principal  area  of  employment  has  been  with  the 
Symphony  of  the  Air,  which  was  the  former  NBC  Toscanini  orches- 
tra. I  have  also  worked  in  television  as  a  musician,  in  individual  con- 
certs in  New  York  of  various  types,  recordings.  This  is  the  general 
area  of  my  employment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  been  connected  with  the  Metropolitan 
Music  School  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  Yes,  sir;  I  have. 

Mr.  Arens.  In  what  capacity? 

Mr.  Walter.  It  is  difficult  to  state.  I  understand,  Mr.  Arens,  that 
you  have  a  record  that  I  was  listed  as  an  instructor.  I  never  instructed 
for  the  Metropolitan  Music  School  to  my  knowledge. 

Mr.  Arens.  Then  what  was  your  capacity  in  which  you  were  identi- 
fied? 

Mr.  Walter.  I  think  a  proper  designation  would  have  been,  pos- 
sibly, as  I  have  been  listening  to  previous  questioning,  as  sponsor, 
perhaps. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  would  like  to  invite  your  attention  to  the  bulletin  of 
the  Metropolitan  Music  School  of  1956-57,  in  which  the  name  David 
Walter  appears  as  a  member  of  the  faculty,  double  bass.  Kindly 
look  at  that  and  see  if  that  refreshes  your  recollection. 

(The  document  was  handed  to  the  witness.) 

Mr.  Walter.  Yes ;  I  see  this. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  that  the  first  time  you  were  aware  of  the  listing  of 
yourself  as  a  member  of  the  faculty  over  the  1956-57  period? 

INIr.  Walter.  Well,  to  my  knowledge,  yes.  I  mean,  somebody  may 
have  mentioned  it  to  me,  but  this  is  the  first  time  that  I  laiew  for  a  fact 
that  it  is  here. 

(Document  previously  designated  "Schwartz  Exhibit  No.  1,"  re- 
tained in  committee  files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  now,  or  have  you  ever  been,  a  Communist? 


726         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

Mr.  Walter.  Mr.  Chairman,  may  I  be  given  a  few  moments  to 
answer  this  question,  which  I  will,  fully?  I  think  you  understand 
why. 

If  you  recall,  in  our  meeting  in  Washington,  I  discussed  this  and 
did  answer  it  finally.  So  all  I  ask  is  the  indulgence  of  the  committee 
for  a  moment. 

In  answer  to  the  first  question,  I  am  not  now  a  Communist.  In  the 
executive  session  which  took  place  on  the  19th  of  February,  I  believe 
it  was,  in  Washington,  I  explained  that  I  had  reasons  for  wishing  to 
decline  for  various  constitutional  grounds,  to  answer  the  question  at 
all  but  that,  in  the  official  capacity  I  had  in  relation  to  an  organization 
I  was  connected  with,  there  had  been  an  indication  to  me  on  the  part 
of  some  of  our  peoj^le  there  that  I  should  keep  an  absolutely — let  me 
correct  that,  if  I  may — that  I  should  respond  to — I  was  given  a  note — 
all  proper  and  improper  questions  of  the  committee  of  all  sorts. 

]\Ir.  Arens.  You  are  not  suggesting  the  committee  asked  you  to 
respond,  are  you  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  No,  I  am  saying  some  members  of  the  organization 
submitted  a  note  to  me. 

Mr.  Doyle.  That  is  your  own  organization  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  The  organization  with  which  I  was  connected  in  an 
official  capacity.  It  said  the  board  requests  its  chairman  to  answer 
all  proper  questions  and  even  improper  questions. 

I  decided  out  of  respect  for  their  opinion  in  the  matter,  because  cer- 
tainly I  am  not  infallible,  that  I  would  answer  all  questions  concern- 
ing tills  organization,  the  life  of  which  commenced  with  its  incorpora- 
tion in  August  of  1954,  and  its  planning  which  began  in  June  of  1954. 
I  will  answer  your  question,  Mr.  Arens,  that  since  June  of  1954, 
I  have  not  been  a  Communist,  nor  am  I  one  now.  I  also  had  at  that 
time  explained,  and  I  will  put  in  the  record  now,  that  I  will  answer 
no  questions  for  the  period  before  June  of  1954  because  of  the  rights 
I  have  under  the  first  and  fifth  amendments  of  the  Constitution. 

]Mr.  Doyle.  May  I  ask  this  one  question?  This  may  clarify  it  for 
all  of  the  committee.  I  think  the  paper  to  which  you  just  referred 
as  having  come  to  you  from  your  organization  instructed  you  to 
answer  all  questions,  proper  and  improper. 

Mr.  Walter.  Yes,  concerning  the  organization. 

Mr.  DoYi.E.  Concerning  the  organization. 

Mr.  Walter.  This  was  not  an  official  document,  sir.  This  was 
purely  a  note  jotted  by  somebody. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  hope  you  are  not  under  the  apprehension  that  this 
committee  is  now  launching  an  investigation  of  the  Symphony  of  the 
Air.    We  are  here  to  interrogate  you  as  an  individual. 

Mr.  Walter.  Have  you  read  my  subpena  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  I  beg  your  pardon? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Walter.  I  am  sorry.  You  say  you  are  not  launching  an  investi- 
gation into — I  am  sorry ;  I  missed  it. 

Mr.  Arens.  The  implication  of  your  instruction  from  the  Sym- 
phony of  the  Air  is  that  we  proposed  now  to  interrogate  you  and 
others  concerning  details  of  the  Symphony  of  the  Air. 

Mr.  Wai.ter.  No,  I  am  sorry.  This  note  was  given  me  at  the 
time  I  appeared  before  General  Kearney  and  Mr.  Doyle  and  yourself 


COMMUNISM    m    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         727 

in  Wiisliingtoii.  This  is  not  of  recent  vintage.  It  goes  back  a  few 
months.    I  just  thought  you  would  be  interested  to  know. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  people  today,  this  moment,  connected 
with  the  Metropolitan  Music  School  or  with  the  Symphony  of  the 
Air  who,  at  aiiy  time,  have  been  known  by  you  to  be  Communists  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  watli  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Walitsr.  As  to  any  period  after  June  of  1954,  I  have  no  such 
knowledge. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  didn't  ask  you  that  cjuestion. 

Mr.  Walter.  Would  you  repeat  it,  sir?    I  did  lose  it. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  the  name  of  any  person  presently  con- 
nected witli  the  IMetropolitan  Music  School  or  with  the  Symphony  of 
the  Air  who  has,  at  any  time,  been  known  by  you  to  have  been  a 
member  of  the  Connnunist  Party? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Walter.  Of  my  knowledge — I  am  sorry.    May  I  consult? 

Mr.  Doyle.  Yes,  indeed. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Walter.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  under  the  iirst  and 
fifth  amendments  of  the  Constitution. 

j\Ir.  Arens.  What  is  your  present  status  with  the  Symphony  of 
the  Air? 

Mr.  Walter.  I  am  the  principal  bass  and  playing  member  of  the 
orchestra. 

INIr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  held  an  office  or  post  within  the  Sym- 
l)hony  of  the  Air  such  as  a  board  member  or  an  official  in  a  directive 
capacity  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  Yes,  sir ;  I  have. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  post  have  you  held,  and  when,  please? 

Mr.  Walter.  I  was  a — is  this  the  Symphony  of  the  Air  which  we 
were  not  launching  an  investigation  into? 

Mr.  Arens.  I  w^as  just  asking  you  the  question,  sir,  of  whether  or 
not  you  had  ever  been  an  official  of  the  Symphony  of  the  Air? 

INIr.  Doyle.  May  I  make  this  clear  on  the  point  our  counsel  is  mak- 
ing, tliat  we  are  talking  about  you,  and  not  your  organization.  It  is 
your  function. 

]Mr.  Walter.  Yes.  You  asked  me  what  official  function  I  had  in 
relation  to  this  organization? 

Mr.  Arens.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Walter.  I  have  been  at  one  time,  for  a  period  of  about  2  montlis, 
an  alternate  board  member,  and  I  have  been  for  a  period  of 

Mr.  Arens.  Excuse  me.  What  year  was  that,  please,  sir?  Was 
that  in  1954? 

Mr.  Wali-er.  No,  sir.  It  was  in  1955,  in  possibly  the  month  of 
February  and  part  of  March.  I  subsequently  was  elected  by  the 
membership  a  niemter  of  the  board  of  directors  and  subsequently  w^as 
elected  chairman  of  the  board  by  the  board. 

Mr.  Arens.  How  long  did  you  serve  as  chairman  of  the  board, 
roughly  speaking  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  For  a  period  of  about  16  months. 

Mr.  Arens.  When  did  your  ])eriod  of  service  as  chainnan  of  the 
board  of  the  Symphony  of  tiie  Air  terminate? 

Ml-.  Walter.  I  am  not  sure  of  the  exact  date.  It  was  approximately 
February  of  this  year. 


728      coMMUisrisM  in  metropolitan  music  school,  inc. 

Mv.  Arens.  Were  you  at  any  time  that  you  were  a  director  or  official 
of  the  Symphony  of  the  Air  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  No,  sir ;  I  wasn't. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  the  Symphony  of  the  Air  take  a  trip  to  the  Far 
East? 

Mr.  Walter.  Yes,  sir ;  it  did. 

Mr.  Arens,  Under  whose  aus]nees,  did  it  take  a  trip  to  the  Far  East  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  I  was  not  an  official  at  that  time,  Mr.  Arens,  and  my 
answer  would  only  be  a  guess.     I  don't  know  firsthand. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  is  your  best  judgment? 

Mr.  Walter.  My  best  recollection  is  that  various  United  States 
agencies  were  involved  in  the  transportation,  the  sponsorshi]j,  et  cetera, 
including  American  National  Theater  and  Academy,  the  United 
States  Information  Service 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  go  on  the  trip  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  Yes,  sir ;  I  did. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  a  Communist  when  you  went  on  the  trip  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  No,  sir ;  I  wasn't. 

Mr.  Arens.  When  did  you  go  on  the  trip  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  We  arrived  in  Tokyo  on  the  1st  of  May,  I  recall,  of 
1955.     We  returned  approximately  the  beginning  of  July. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  there  any  persons  on  the  trip  who  were  known 
by  you,  at  the  time  of  the  trip,  to  liave  been  members  of  the  Communist 
Party? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Walter.  I  must  decline  to  answer  for  the  reasons  I  have  given 
before,  the  first  and  fifth  amendments. 

Mr.  Arens.  When  was  this  trip  taken ;  what  year  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  I  will  repeat ;  in  1955. 

Mr.  Arens.  Then  after  the  Symphony  of  the  Air  returned  to  the 
United  States,  was  it  proposed  that  it  take  another  trip  to  the  Near 
East  as  distinct  from  the  Far  East  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  I  am  sorry.     Proposed  by  whom,  sir  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  By  anybody. 

Mr.  WxVLTER.  Many  of  the  men  in  the  orchestra  have  always  pro- 
posed that  we  always  take  trips.  Are  you  specifically  referring  to 
some  individual  or  agency? 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  have  information  respecting  any  proposals  that 
the  Symphony  of  the  Air  take  a  trip  to  the  Near  East  in  1956  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Then  give  us  that  i nf ormation,  please,  sir. 

Mr.  Walter.  At  least  two  dozen  of  our  men  have  constantly  been 
urging  that  we  return  to  Japan  where  we  had — by  way  of  the  Near 
East — where  we  had  a  great  success,  as  you,  I  believe,  recall.  It  was 
also  suggested  by  governmental  agencies  that  we  might  be  considered 
for  a  tour,  and  there  Avas  a  period  during  which  it  seemed  that  such  a 
tour  was  imminent. 

Mr.  Arens.  Then  what  happened  to  the  imminency  of  this  tour? 

Mr.  Walter.  It  became  nonimminent  because  of  the  fact  that  there 
were  questions  raised  concerning  the  advisability  of  the  tour  and  the 
difficulties  of  such  a  tour. 

Mr.  Arens.  Who  i-aised  those  questions  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  If  j'ou  will  forgive  me  for  not  having  a  document 
here 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         729 

Mr.  Arens.  May  1  ask  you,  did  the  cluiirnian  of  a  special  coininit- 
tee  or  a  siibcoinmittee  of  the  House  of  Eepresentatives  of  the  United 
States  Congress  raise  any  (questions  'i 

Mr.  Walteu.  Not  abo'ut  an  imminent  tour,  that  I  recall. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  questions  raised  in  the  United  States  Congress 
in  a  subcommittee  respecting  the  Symphony  of  the  Air? 

Mr.  Walter.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arexs.  And  what  conunittee  was  that  i 

Mr.  Walter.  It  was  a  sulK-ommittee  of  the  House  Appropriations 
Committee,  as  I  recall. 

Mr.  Akens.  That  was  tiie  Kooney  committee,  was  it  not;  the  so- 
called  Rooney  committee? 

Mr.  Walter.  I  am  not  sure  of  the  name. 

Mr.  Arens.  It  was  a  sulx-ommittee  of  the  Appropriations  Com- 
mittee. .       . 

Did  the  question  or  issue  of  communism  arise  in  the  so-called 
Ivooney  committee  with  reference  to  the  Symphony  of  the  Aii-? 

Mr.  Walter.  No,  sir;  not  in  precisely  that  way. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Then  tell  us  in  your  own  words  how  it  arose. 

Mr.  Fraexkel.  May  I  be  permitted  to  interject  a  remark  here? 

Mr.  Arexs.  Your  sole  and  exclusive  prerogative.  Counsel,  is  to  ad- 
vise your  witness. 

Mr.  Fraexkel.  I  understand  that,  but- 


Mr.  Arexs.  Mr.  Witness,  do  you  have  information  from  any  source 
respecting  the  issues  that  were  precipitated  in  the  Rooney  subcom- 
mittee with  i-eference  to  the  Sympliony  of  the  Air?  That  is  the  out- 
standing question. 

Mr.  Walter.  I  would  like  to  speak  to  my  counsel. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Go  ahead.    Take  your  time. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Walter.  I  am  sorry,  Mr.  Arens;  would  you  mind  repeating  it? 

Mr.  Arexs.  Do  you  have  information,  and  did  you  have  informa- 
tion from  any  source,  that  in  the  so-called  Rooney  hearings  the  issue 
of  communism  was  raised  with  reference  to  the  Symphony  of  the 
Air? 

Mr.  Walter.  Well,  I  read  about  it  in  the  newspapers,  among  other 
sources  of  information.    Yes ;  I  did  have  such. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  have  been  sparring  with  me  now  on  this  thing  for 
about  5  minutes. 

Mr.  Walter.  I  am  sorry,  Mr.  Arens,  but  I  don't  think  that  any 
answer  I  have  given  will  show  anything  but  respect  for  this  com- 
mittee. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  didn't  say  you  were  disrespectful.  I  said  you  were 
sparring  with  me.  Tell  me,  did  you  at  any  time  during  the  Rooney 
hearings,  or  shortly  thereafter,  obtain  information  that  certain  mem- 
bers connected  with  the  Symphony  of  the  Air  have  been  or  are 
Communists  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  Yes;  I  did  obtain  such  information. 

Mr.  Arens.  '\Vliat  happened  from  the  standpoint  of  the  Symphony 
of  the  Air  trying  to  divest  from  the  Symphony  of  tlie  Air  tliose  people, 

91198— 57— pt.  1 9 


730         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN   MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

if  any,  who  may  have  been  Communists  who  were  connected  with  the 
Symphony  of  the  Air  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  If  I  untierstand  your  question,  you  are  asking  what 
the  Symphony  of  the  Air  did  to  divest  itself '( 

Mr.  Arens.  Yes.  Tell  us  in  your  own  words  what  happened  after 
the  Sympliony  of  the  Air  had  its  attention  called  to  the  essence  of  the 
Rooney  hearings,  in  whicli  a  number  of  people  were  alleged  to  have 
been  Connnunists.     What  did  the  Symphony  of  the  Air  do  about  it? 

Mr.  Walter.  We  did  generally  two  things.  The  first  is,  we  sent  a 
delegation — I  \\as  a  member — to  the  officials  of  the  State  Department 
and  asked  them  to  give  us  the  record.  We  asked  the  State  Department 
to  give  us  the  record  of  the  Kooney  connnittee  hearings,  with  names 
and  all  the  other  information  that  it  had,  so  that  we  could  take  up  this 
matter  proi)erly.     It  was  denied  us. 

Mr.  Arexs.  What  was  tlie  status  you  then  occupied  with  the 
Symphony  of  the  Air? 

Mr.  Walter.  I  am  sorry. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  was  the  status  you  then  occupied  with  the  Sym- 
phony of  the  Air  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  I  was  chairman  of  the  board. 

Mr.  Arens.  That  was  in  what  year  'I 

Mr.  Wal'J'er.  Specifically,  it  was  in  March  of  1956. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  happened,  if  anything,  within  the  board  of  direc- 
tors of  the  Sym])hony  of  the  Air  from  the  standpoint  of  a  resolution  to 
impose  a  loyalty  oath  upon  the  members  of  the  Symphony  of  the  Air, 
or  to  undertake  to  disassociate  from  the  Symphony  of  the  Air,  Com- 
munists ? 

Was  there  any  resolution  ])roposed  along  that  line? 

Mr.  Walter.  Well,  there  was  a  resolution  submitted  to  the  board  by 
members  of  the  organization. 

Mr.  Arens.  Who  submitted  the  resolution  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  I  don't  have  that  information,  but  you  have  the  records 
which  you  have  subpenaed  from  our  organization. 

Mr.  Arens.  There  were  a  number  of  people  who  joined  together  in 
requesting  the  board  to  take  action ;  is  that  not  true  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  Yes.     You  have  this  record. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  was  the  essence  of  this  request? 

Mr.  Walit^r.  If  I  remember  correctly,  the  request  consisted  of  4—3 
or  4 — requests.     I  would  respectfully  suggest  that  you 

Mr.  Arens.  I  should  like  to  lay  before  you  now,  sir,  and  perhaps  it 
will  refresh  your  recollection,  a  photostatic  reproduction  of  a  mes- 
sage to  the  board  of  directors  of  the  Symphony  Foundation  of  Amer- 
ica, from  a  number  of  people,  in  which  it  is  requested,  among  other 
things,  that  an  emergency  membership  meeting,  where  a  loyalty  oath 
must  be  presented  for  signature  of  the  members,  be  called. 

Kindly  look  at  that  photostatic  reproduction  of  that  document  and 
tell  us  whether  or  not  that  refreshes  your  recollection  with  reference 
to  the  petition  which  was  directed  to  the  board  of  directors  of  the 
Symphony  of  the  Air,  while  you  were  head  of  that  organization. 

(The  document  was  handed  to  the  witness.) 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Walter.  What  is  the  question — whether  I  remember  this? 

Mr.  Arens.  Yes.  Whether  that  is  the  document  that  was  sub- 
mitted.    Is  that  a  true  and  correct  copy  ? 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         731 

Mr.  Walter.   Yes.     1  have  seen  tliis  before,  1  believe. 

(Document  marked  "Walter  Exhibit  No.  1,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arexs.  What  did  the  board  do  pursuant  to  that  message  there, 
that  epistle  from  the  several  members'^ 

Mr.  Walter.  The  Ijoard  accepted  this  for  ])resentation  to  the  mem- 
bership at  its  next  membership  meeting. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Did  the  board  call  a  meeting? 

Mr.  Walter.  Well,  meetings  are  called  automatically  by  the  by- 
laws— the  provisions  for  them. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Was  there  a  meeting  set  up  for  the  purpose  of  having 
action  taken  pursuant  to  the  request  contained  in  this? 

]\Ir.  Walter.  No,  sir.  If  you  will  see,  it  says  something  about  a 
special  meeting;  but  the  date  was  in  such  proximity  to  our  regular 
meeting  that  1  believe,  and  1  am  not  sure  of  it,  we  had  the  special 
and  regular  meeting  at  the  same  time. 

Mr.  Arex^s.  At  tJie  meeting  of  the  membership  to  which  you  now 
allude,  was  the  issue  brought  up  as  to  how  the  Symphony  of  the  Air 
might  divest  itself  of  any  persons  alleged  to  be  Communists? 

Mr.  Walter.  There  was  an  informal  discussion  due  to  the  fact  that 
there  was  no  quorum.  Many  of  these  people  and  other  people  didn't 
attend  in  sufficient  numbers,  so  there  was  no  quorum.  There  was  an 
informal  discussion,  but  this  specific  resolution  or  suggestion  never 
came  up  formally. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Did  you  preside  at  the  meeting? 

^Ir.  AValter.  I  did,  su';  yes. 

Mr.  Arexs.  In  view  of  the  fact  that  there  wasn't  a  quorum,  was 
another  meeting  called? 

Mr.  AValter.  Yes,  sir.  The  following  month's  meeting  also  didn"'*- 
have  a  quorum. 

Mr.  Arex^s.  We  are  still  in  1956,  are  we  ? 

Mr.  AValter.  Yes,  sir.     AVe  would  be  in  about  April  or  May. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Did  you  preside  at  the  second  meeting  ? 

Mr.  AA^ALTER.  I  suppose  so ;  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  AA^as  the  matter  brought  up  at  the  second  meeting,  as 
to  the  allegations  of  connnunism  in  the  Symphony  of  the  Air? 

Mr.  AValter.  I  am  only  guessing,  sir.  I  don't  remember  specifi- 
cally that  it  was.  I  assume  it  was,  because  ordinarily  the  secretary 
or  some  other  official  would  prepare  a  sort  of  agenda,  and  we  would 
discuss  it  loosely. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Did  the  board  vote  to  submit  this  issue  to  the  mem- 
bership i 

Mr.  AA^ALTER.  Yes,  sir.     AVell,  I  recollect  so,  but  I  am  not  positive. 

Mr.  Arexs.  AA^'as  there  a  third  meeting  at  which  this  issue  was  to  be 
brought  up  ?  By  "this  issue"  I  mean  the  principal  issue  we  are  dis- 
cussing of  alleged  Connnunists  in  the  Symphony  of  the  Air. 

Mr.  Walter.  I  don't  remember  dates  now,  Mr.  Arens,  but  I  believe 
we  are  now  into  the  summer;  and  during  the  summer  we  were,  most 
of  us,  out  of  town. 

Mr.  Arexs.  AVas  it  ever  brought  up  at  a  meeting  in  which  there 
was  a  quorum  present  ? 

Mr.  AA^alter.  As  I  related  to  you  in  AA^ashington,  I  don't  remember 
its  being  brought  up ;  but  I  think  that  it  w^as  purely — and  this  is  just 
speculation  on  my  part  and  represents  my  own  opinion  about  it — 


732         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN   MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

purely  oversight,  purely  a  matter  of  a  thing-  being  tabled  for  5  months 
and  finally  getting  sort  of  lost  under  the  table.  But  I  don't  believe 
there  was  any  deliberate  intent. 

Mr.  Arens.  At  the  two  meetings  at  which  quorums  were  not  present, 
you  presided;  did  you  not? 

Mr.  Walter.  I  believe  I  presided  during  all  meetings  in  my 
incumbency. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Did  you  speak  for  the  resohition  or  did  you  speak 
against  the  resolution  at  those  two  meetings? 

JNIr.  Walter.  The  resolution  did  not  come  u{)  in  a  formal  manner. 
Since  there  was  an  informal  discussion,  I  probably  did  not  partici- 
pate, but  onlj^  chaired. 

Mr.  Arens.  At  the  very  time  that  you  had  this  meeting  of  the 
membership  of  the  Sympliony  of  the  Air  to  discuss  the  question  and 
take  action  on  the  question  of  alleged  Communists  in  the  Symphony 
of  the  Air,  were  there  present  in  that  very  meeting  people  who,  at 
any  time,  were  known  by  you  to  have  been  members  of  the  Communist 
Party? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

]\Ir.  Walter.  I  decline  to  answer  undei-  the  first  and  fifth  guaranties 
of  the  Constitution. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  you  were  chairman  of  the  meeting;  is  that  correct? 
Mr.  Walter.  I  was,  sir ;  yes. 

]\Ir,  Doyle.  Mr.  Counsel,  may  I  interrupt  there?     As  I  understood 
it.  Witness,  you  stated  you  were  going  to  answer  questions,  whether 
proper  or  improper,  subsequent  to  a  certain  date  in  1954. 
Mr.  Walter.  Slay  I  reframe  my  answer,  then  ? 
Mr.  Doyle.  I  think  that  is  what  you  stated  twice.     Is  that  correct? 
Mr.  Walter.  Yes,  sir.     May  I  amplify  or  clarify  this  answer? 
Mr.  Doyle.  Am  I  correct  that  you  fixed  a  date  in  1954,  after  which 
you  would  answer  questions,  whether  they  were  proper  or  improper 
in  your  judgment? 

Mr.  Walter.  Yes,  sir;  concerning  the  foundation.  But  this  ques- 
tion reaches  to  the  matter  of  knowledge  which  precedes  the  date  of  the 

foundation,  and  consequently 

Mr.  Doyle.  This  question  is  directed  to  a  question  of  fact,  in  1956, 
2  years  after  the  date  you  fixed.     It  is  a  question  of  fact  of  what  was 
done  at  that  meeting  in  1956  that  we  are  questioning.     This  question 
is  not  prior  to  1954.     It  is  a  question  of  your  knowledge  in  1956. 
(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 
Mr.  Doyle.  Excuse  me  for  interrupting. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  think  it  helps  very  much,  Mr.  Chairman,  to  clear  the 
record  on  that  point.     I  am  delighted  that  you  did  participate. 
Mr.  Walter.  I  am  sorry,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  Would  it  help  you  if  we  go  back  over  the  essence  of 
what  we  just  covered  ? 

Mr.  Fraenkel.  May  I  just  violate  the  rules  of  the  committee  for  a 
moment?  This  is  one  of  those  most  difficult  situations  where  the  wit- 
ness is  involved  in  something  that  would  constitute  a  waiver  of  his 
privilege.  As  you  know",  there  is  nothing  more  difficult.  I  have 
tried  to  advise  him  how  to  formulate  his  answer. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  should  like  to  clear  the  record  on  several  points. 
Mr.  Fraenkel.  If  I  could  make  one  brief  statement,  I  think  it  will 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         733 

clear  this.  The  witness  has  pleaded  the  fifth  amendment  with  respect 
to  his  possible  membership  in  the  Communist  Party  prior  to  1954. 
He,  therefore,  must  consistently  refuse  to  answer  as  to  knowledge 
which  he  acquired  prior  to  1954,  although  that  knowledge  may  have 
continued  into  1956. 

Mr.  Arens.  Frankly,  I  agree  with  you. 

Mr.  Fr.\enkel.  He  can,  however,  state  whether  or  not  he  had  any 
knowledge  that  in  1956  any  person  present  was  then  a  member  of  the 
Communist  Party. 

Mr.  Arens.  How  could  he,  if  he  disassociated  himself,  or  if  a  fair 
implication  would  be  that  he  disassociated  himself  from  the  Commu- 
nist Party  in  1954  ? 

The  thing  on  this  record  is  that  we  want  to  be  sure  that  he  has  an 
opportunity,  if  he  wants  to  do  so,  to  avail  himself  of  the  fifth  amend- 
ment, as  of  the  very  time  that  he  was  in  that  meeting  which  he  chaired. 
I  would  like  to  make  this  record  clear  on  about  three  points. 

Xo.  1,  Mr.  Walter,  the  request  from  the  membership  in  March  1956 
was  that  the  board  of  directors  call  an  emergency  membership  meet- 
ing to  discuss  this  question  of  Communists  in  the  Symphony  of  the 
Air ;  is  that  correct  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  No,  sir;  tliat  is  not  correct.  That  was  a  request  of  a 
group  of  members,  but  not  the  membership. 

Mr.  Arens.  Of  a  group  of  members  who  submitted  the  petition. 
Twenty -two  members  submitted  a  petition. 

Mr.  Walter.  We  have  92  in  total. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  22  submitted  a  request  tliat  an  en.iergency  meeting 
be  called ;  is  that  correct  ? 

Mr,  Walter.  That  is  correct, 

Mr.  Arens.  No.  2,  the  board  then  decided,  did  it  not,  to  refer  the 
issue  to  the  membership  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  It  did,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  Not  in  an  emergency,  but  in  the  next  regular  meeting? 

Mr.  Walter.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  chaired  the  next  regular  meeting,  did  you  not? 

Mr.  Walter.  I  did. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  you  chaired  the  next  succeeding  meeting,  did  you 
not? 

Mr.  Walter.  To  the  best  of  my  recollection,  I  did. 

Mr.  Arens.  At  those  2  next  succeeding  meetings  of  the  member- 
ship of  the  Symphony  of  the  Air,  were  there  people  present  in  the 
room,  at  that  instant,  who  were  to  vote  on  this  issue  who  were  known 
by  you  to  have  bean,  at  any  time,  members  of  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  I  decline  to  answer  that  under  n:iy  rights  under  tiie 
first  and  fifth  amendments. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  did  not  speak  up  for  the  resolution  at  any  time, 
did  you  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  I  neither  spoke  up  for  it  nor  condemned  it,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  Was  Elayne  Jones  connected  at  any  time,  to  your 
knowledge,  with  the  Symphony  of  the  Air  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  In  the  most  momentary  capacity. 

Mr.  Arens.  Tell  us  about  the  momentaiy  capacity. 

Mr.  Walter.  Our  tympanist— his  wife  had  died  about  a  day  be- 
fore or  2  days  befo:  ^,  a  concert.    The  procedux'e  in  that  case  was  to 

01198— 57— pt.  1 10 


734         COMMUNISM    EST    METROPOLITAN   MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

have,  in  case  of  emergencies,  to  have  the  personnel  manager  of  the 
orchestra  find  the  very  best  person  available  and  hire  them. 

I  understood,  though  I  had  never  had  firsthand  knowledge  of  it, 
that  Miss  Jones  was  one  of  the  outstanding  tympanists ;  and  she  was 
hired  by  the  personnel  manager, 

Mr.  Arens.  To  your  certain  knowledge,  was  Elayne  Jones  ever  a 
member  of  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  I  decline  to  answer  that  for  the  reasons  already  given. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Counsel,  I  hesitate  to  interrupt  again,  but  I  do  not 
want  the  record  to  show — and  I  do  not  want  any  possible  under- 
standing to  be  arrived  at,  directly  or  indirectly  by  counsel,  or  any 
assumption  of  the  witness  or  witness'  counsel — that  this  committee  is 
accepting  any  limitation  in  our  questions.  In  other  words,  this  com- 
mittee certainly  must  not,  in  any  way,  be  considered  as  accepting  this 
witness'  offer  to  testify  only  subsequent  to  this  date  in  April  1954. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  believe  he  understands  that,  Mr.  Chairman. 

Mr.  Walter.  I  tried  to  amplify  this,  Mr.  Chairman. 

Mr.  Doyle.  I  want  the  record  to  be  clear.  I  am  sure  I  have  no  such 
intention,  and  I  am  sure  no  committee  member  has  any  such  intention. 

Mr.  Walter.  Will  you  excuse  me  a  moment  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Fraenkel.  May  I  suggest  this :  That  your  questions  be  limited 
to  the  period  after  1954  ? 

Mr.  x\rens.  We  have  been  over  this  before,  Counsel. 

Mr.  Fraenkel.  I  know  we  have. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Witness,  has  Harry  Smyles  ever  been  connected 
with  the  Symphony  of  the  Air  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  Not  to  my  knowledge ;  no,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  Harry  Smyles  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  Well,  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  Can  you  tell  this  committee  whether  or  not,  to  your 
certain  knowledge,  Hariy  Smyles  has  ever  been  a  member  of  the 
Coimnunist  Party? 

Mr.  Walter,  I  will  decline  to  ansAver  that  for  the  reasons  given 
previously. 

Mr.  Arens.  Has  Max  Pollikoff  ever  been  connected  with  the  Sym- 
phony of  the  Air  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  If  he  has,  it  has  been  only  in  the  most  limited  circum- 
stances. I  don't  recall  his  playing  with  us,  but  he  may  have.  We 
have,  ordinarily,  about  34  or  36  violinists,  and  people  get  lost, 

Mr.  Arens.  Can  jou  tell  this  committee  whether  or  not,  to  your 
certain  knowledge.  Max  Pollikoff'  has  ever  been  a  member  of  the  Com- 
munist Party? 

Mr.  Walter.  I  shall  decline  to  answer  that  for  the  same  reasons 
given. 

Mr,  Arens,  Has  Max  Hollander  ever  been  connected  with  the  Sym- 
phony of  the  Air  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  Also  in  a  limited  capacity,  I  believe. 

Mr.  Arens.  He  is  a  member,  is  he  not? 

Mr,  Walter,  Yes,  but  I  just  explain  to  clarify  this  that  the  Sym- 
phony of  the  Air  is  a  playing  organization.  It  is  the  orchestra  that 
was  originally  formed  by  the  National  Broadcasting  Co,  to  be 
conducted  by  Arturo  Toscanini;  and  when  it  left  that  capacity,  it 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         735 

subsequently  became  the  Symphony  of  the  Air.  It  is  run  by  a  foun- 
dation called  the  Symphony  Foundation  of  America,  the  members  of 
which  are  not  in  all  cases  players  in  the  orchestra,  you  see. 

Mr.  Arens.  Now,  can  you  tell  this  committee  whether  or  not,  to 
your  certain  knowledge,  Max  Hollander  has  ever  been  a  member  of 
the  Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  I  will  decline  to  answer  that. 

Mr.  Arens.  Has  Louis  Graeler  ever  been  connected  with  the  Sym- 
phony of  the  Air^ 

Mr.  Walter.  I  decline  to  answer 

Mr.  Arens.  No;  I  asked  if  he  had  been  connected  with  the  Sym- 
phony of  the  Air.     You  are  anticipating  me. 

Mr.  Walit:r.  Has  Louis  Graeler  been  a  member  of  the  Symphony 
of  the  Air  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Been  connected  with  it,  and,  if  so,  in  what  capacity? 

Mr.  Walter.  Yes ;  he  is  a  violinist. 

Mr.  Arens.  To  your  knowledge,  has  Louis  Graeler  ever  been  a 
member  of  the  Communist  Party  'i 

Mr.  Walter.  I  will  decline  to  answer  that. 

Mr.  Arens.  Was  Louis  Graeler  ever  present  at  some  of  these  meet- 
ings where  the  question  was  supposed  to  be  brought  up  to  the  mem- 
bership about  communism  in  the  Symphony  of  tlie  Air? 

Mr.  Walter.  I  have  no  way  of  knowing.  We  didn't  keep  attend- 
ance records. 

Mr.  Arens.  Sterling  Hunkins,  has  he  been  connected  with  the 
Symphony  of  the  Air? 

Mr.  Walter.  I  believe  he  played  2  or  3  times  with  us.  I  am  not 
certain  of  that. 

Mr.  Arens.  To  your  certain  knowledge,  has  Sterling  Hunkins  ever 
been  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  I  decline  to  answer  for  the  reasons  given. 

Mr.  Arens.  Elias  Carmen,  has  he  ever  been  connected  with  the 
Symphony  of  the  Air? 

Mr.  Walter.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  In  what  capacity  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  He  is  the  principal  bassoonist  and  one  of  the  greatest 
in  the  world. 

Mr.  Arens.  To  your  certain  knowledge,  has  Elias  Carmen  ever 
been  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  I  must  decline  for  the  reasons  I  have  given  before. 

Mr.  Arens.  George  Koukly,  has  he  ever  been  connected  with  the 
Symphony  of  the  Air  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  I  believe  he  may  have  substituted  at  one  time  or  an- 
other, perhaps  no  more  than  2  times  or  ?>  times,  but  I  am  not  sure. 

Mr.  Arens.  To  your  certain  knowledge,  has  George  Koukly  ever 
been  a  member  of  tlie  Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  I  shall  decline  to  answer  that  for  the  reasons  given. 

Mr.  Arens.  David  Freed,  has  he  ever  been  connected  with  the 
Symphony  of  the  Air  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  May  I  answer  tliat  in  just  a  moment,  and  just  giA'e 
one  sentence  of  clarification  to  the  gentleman  tliere  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Surely. 

Mr.  Walter.  As  you  may  know,  we  are  like  philharmonics— Phil- 
adelphia and  Boston  and  the  other  three  major  orchestras  in  this 


736         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

country — and  are  not  set  up  on  a  year-round  basis,  but  are  what  are 
called  free-lance  orchestras.  Therefore,  because  of  many  of  the  com- 
mitments that  some  of  our  people  have  made  for  solo  appearances,  in 
previous  periods,  sometimes  they  couldn't  appear  at  concerts;  and 
so,  in  some  periods,  the  incidents  of  substitutes  would  be  more  so 
than  would  be  the  case  in  some  of  these  other  orchestras.  I  just  men- 
tion this  for  why  you  find  substitutes  in  a  symphony  orchestra. 
Usually  it  was  2  or  3  or  4  times  in  a  period  of  a  year. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  next  is  David  Freed. 

Mr.  Walter.  I  believe  he  played  with  us  a  few  times.  I  don't  recall 
how  many. 

Mr.  Arens.  To  your  knowledge,  was  he  ever  a  member  of  the  Com- 
munist Party? 

Mr.  Walter.  I  shall  decline  to  answer  that  for  the  previous  reasons. 

Mr.  Arens.  Benjamin  Steinberg,  was  he  ever  a  member  of  the 
Symphony  of  the  Air  or  ever  identified  with  it  or  connected  with  it? 

Mr.  Walter.  He  was  not  a  member,  but  I  believe  he  did  substitute 
at  one  time. 

Mr.  Arens.  Was  he,  to  your  certain  knowledge,  ever  a  Communist? 

Mr.  Walter.  I  shall  decline  to  answer  for  the  reasons  given, 

Mr.  Arens.  Tell  the  committee  what  you  had  to  do  with  lining  up 
these  substitutes  and  with  designating  the  people  who  did  serve  on  the 
Symphony  of  the  Air. 

i\Ir.  Walter.  I  shall  be  happy  to  do  so,  sir.  In  my  capacity  as  chair- 
niiin  of  a  coo])erative  organizatiou,  T  found  the  pressures,  lioth  from 
circumshnices  ;ind  |)eople,  of  such  inngnihid*!  that  I  de<"i(]pd  at  the 
\erv  first  instance  that  I  would  hoAe  no  part  of  the  picture  which  we 
called  our  personnel  picture,  I,  therefore,  did  not  serve  on  the  per- 
sonnel committee  nor  attend  personnel  meetings,  I  did  not  recom- 
mend or  hire  people.  I  did  not  even  participate  in  the  discussion  of 
what  has  come  to  be  known  as  our  master  list,  which  contains  the  names 
of  people  who  are  members  and  available  substitutes,  except  in  the 
area  recently  where  I  recommended  some  bass  players  in  case  we  had 
emergencies.  That  was  in  my  capacity  not  as  chairman,  but  as  the 
principal  bass  player. 

Mr,  Arens.  Who  is  William  Dorn  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  A  musician,  a  drummer,  a  member,  in  the  past,  of  the 
orchestra. 

Mr.  Ah:::ns.  Do  you  recall  William  Dorn — and  I  say  immediately,, 
3/Ir'.  Chairniaii,  for  the  purpose  of  this  record,^  that  we  have  no  informa- 
tion that  reflects  at  all  unfavorably  upon  this  gentleman — do  3^011  re- 
call that  William  Dorn  submitted  to  the  group  of  the  Symphony  of  the 
Air  a  resolution ; 

Resolved,  That  "The  Symphony  of  the  Air"  or  its  officers  shall  not  suffer  a 
known  Communist,  Nazist,  or  Fascist  to  be  a  member  of  our  Orchestra.  Regis- 
tration in  the  Communist,  Nazist  or  Fascist  party  or  membership  in  Com- 
munist "Front"  organizations  shall  be  deemed  sufficient  eau.se  for  the  explusion 
of  any  member — 

And  so  forth. 

Do  you  recall  a  lesolution  which  Mr,  William  Dorn  submitted  to  that 
effect  to  the  Symphony  of  the  Air  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  Yes,  sir.  I  had  an  active  part  in  making  sure  that 
got  into  that  newsletter  that  you  have  there. 


CORIMUNISM    IN   METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         737 

(Document  marked  "Walter  Exliibit  No.  2,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee file.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  support  William  Dorn's  resolution  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  Will  you  excuse  me  a  moment  ? 
(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Walter.  No,  sir,  I  didn't  support  this  resolution  because  it  ran 
counter  to  all  the  philosophy,  all  the  thinking  that  I  had  been  trained 
in  as  a  musician. 

I  had,  as  you  know,  I  think,  Mr.  Arens,  played  for  Mr.  Toscanini 
as  an  individual  and  had  been  hired  for  the  orchestra.  No  questions 
were  asked  me.  I  thought  that  the  proper  agencies  to  deal  with  the 
realms  of  membership  in  such  organizations  were,  in  most  cases,  best 
governmental  agencies  rather  than  individual  committees  set  up 
within  each  individual  organization. 

I  felt  that  it  violated  a  whole  precept  that  we  have  lived  under  as 
musicians,  namely,  that  you  are  chosen  to  play  artistically  in  America 
for  your  artistic  integrity  and  artistic  ability,  rather  than  for  any 
other  consideration.  I  am  happy  to  see  that  in  almost  every  area  in 
our  field  of  music,  and  especially  concert  music,  this  has  obtained. 
People  of  the  greatest  artistry,  the  Heifetzs,  tlie  Rubinsteins,  and  so 
on,  have  always  won  acclaim ;  and  they  have  never  been  questioned  as 
to  their  politics.     We,  in  our  orchestra,  felt  the  same  way  about  it. 

Mr.  Areis's.  Would  you  engage,  or  would  you  take  the  same  position 
with  reference  to,  a  person  who  was  a  known  murderer? 

Mr.  Walter.  I  would  take  a  position  that  the  courts  should  get 
after  him,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  Would  you  engage,  or  would  you  permit  to  be  in  your 
Symphony  of  the  Air,  a  person  who  was  a  known  j)sycopathic  ar- 
sonist ? 

Mr.  Walter.  I  could  only  know  such  information  on  the  basis  of 
what  they  had  done,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  The  resolution  calls  for  the  expulsion  from  the  Sym- 
phony of  the  Air  of  persons  who  are  known  Communists.  If  a  person 
had  been  identified  in  public  session  by  witnesses  under  oath,  or  had 
been  identified  as  a  known  Communist  in  a  trial,  such  as  the  trial  here 
at  Foley  Square  of  the  11  Communists,  would  you  then  have  taken  a 
position  that  they  should  not  be  engaged  in  the  Symphony  of  the  Air? 

(At  this  point  Representative  Bernard  W.  Kearney  left  the  hear- 
ing room.) 

Mr.  AValter.  I  really  haven't  come  very  far  from  the  puzzlement 
which  struck  me  when  I  was  asked  the  same  question  in  Washington, 
Mr.  Arens.  The  thinking  is  so  completely  foreign  to  me,  when  one 
asks  a  political  question  of  a  performing  musician,  that  I  don't  know 
how  to  answer  the  question. 

Mr.  Arens.  If  communism  and  the  Communist  Party  is  only  a 
party  of  political  activity,  did  you  ever  disassociate  yourself  from  a 
political  party  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  I  don't  understand  the  question. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  take  the  position  now  that  the  Communist  Party 
is  a  matter  of  politics,  of  political  activity.  Some  of  us  feel  it  is  a 
matter  of  a  conspiratorial  apparatus.  But  if  you  take  the  position 
that  the  Communist  Party  is  only  a  political  party — and  that  a  Com- 
munist is  only  one  who  entertains  certain  political  ideas — if  you  as- 


738  COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

sume  that  position,  then  tell  us  whether  or  not  you  are  a  member  of 
the  innocent  political  organization  known  as  the  Communist  Party. 

(At  this  point  Representative  James  B.  Frazier,  Jr.,  left  the  hearing 
room.) 

Mr.  Walter.  Could  we  have  the  question  back?  It  was  a  long 
one. 

Mr.  Aeens.  You  take  the  position  here,  apparently,  that  you  would 
not  support  the  resolution  of  INIr.  Dorn  to  expel  Communists,  known 
Communists,  from  the  Symphony  of  the  Air  because  that  is  a  matter 
of  political  belief;  isn't' that  correct?  That  is  the  essence  of  your 
position? 

(At  this  point,  Re])resentatives  James  B.  Frazier,  Jr.,  and  Bernard 
W.  Kearney  returned  to  the  hearing  room.) 

Mr.  Walter.  I  am  a  little  tired,  I  guess.  Did  you  ask  me  if  that 
was  my  position  ? 

Mr.  Arexs.  Yes.     Is  that  your  position  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  I  am  sorry,  but  you  said  of  opposition  to  the  resolu- 
tion or  of  support  for  the  resolution? 

Mr.  Arens.  Was  that  your  position — that  you  could  not  support 
Mr.  Dorn's  resolution  because  a  Communist  is  just  a  person  with  a 
political  belief,  political  philosophy? 

Mr.  Walter.  No,  sir.  You  are  oversimplifying  my  position.  My 
l)osition  is  simply  that  we  have  never  asked,  and  would  have  no 
knowledge  of  it  and  that  if  tliere  were  such  knowledge,  the  matter 
would  be  taken  out  of  our  hands  by  courts  or  other  agencies  equipped 
to  deal  with  this. 

Mr.  Arens.  Let's  just  probe  that  for  a  moment.  Let  us  assume  for 
the  sake  of  clarification  here  that  a  particular  individual  is  identified 
in  the  court,  in  a  trial,  as  a  Communist  and  is  convicted  as  a  Com- 
munist. Would  you  then  advocate  or  oppose  his  membership  in  the 
Symphony  of  the  Air? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Walter.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  don't  know  what  the  rules  of  p)roce- 
dure  are  concerning  hypothetical  questions,  but  I  can't  see  this  as  a  real 
situation. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  opened  the  door.  You  said  you  could  not  support 
the  Dorn  resolution  because  you  said  that  it  went  into  a  question  of  a 
man's  politics.  The  Dorn  resolution  called  for  the  expulsion  of  known 
Communists. 

Mr.  Walter.  You  are  equating  that,  Mr.  Arens,  to  mean  something 
on  political  parties,  on  w^hich  I  am  not  an  expert. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Arens.  I  think  you  understand  what  I  mean. 

Mr.  Doyle.  May  I  suggest  to  the  witness,  too,  because  you  used 
my  name  in  connection  with  j^our  answer  a  few  minut«s  ago^ • 

JNIr.  Walter.  With  no  disrespect,  sir. 

Mr.  Doyle.  I  know  that.  But  I  remember,  as  you  do,  and  you 
called  it  to  our  attention  here,  that  you  were  asked  this  same  question 
a  couple  of  months  ago.  I  call  that  to  your  attention  because  today, 
a  few  minutes  ago,  you  said  that  it  was  something  that  you  had  not 
thought  about.  You  were  asked  the  question  a  couple  of  months  ago, 
the  same  question.  Certainl}^  you  have  thought  about  it  in  the  last 
2  months.     At  least  I  hope  you  have. 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         739 

Mr.  Walter.  May  I  state,  Mr.  Doyle,  that  I  sent  Congressman 
Walter  a  telegram  asking  if  I  could  examine  the  testimony,  and  I 
have  received  no  answer.  I  thought  I  had  a  right  to  see  that.  I  am 
still  in  a  state  of  puzzlement. 

Mr.  Doyle.  I  would  think  after  the  executive  session,  when  the 
questions  were  asked  of  you,  even  as  a  high-class  musician,  that  you 
would  certainly  have  thought  about  them  in  the  interim. 

Mr.  Fraenkel.  May  I  again  state,  to  get  out  of  my  |)ropei-  function, 
that  I  think  the  committee  is  going  far  afield  here. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Counsel,  we  cannot  accept  the  premise  that,  because 
a  man  is  a  musician,  he  is  excused  from  complying  with  Federal 
statutes.  In  other  words,  we  cannot  accept  the  theory  of  this  witness 
that  the  musical  field,  in  which  he  is  engaged,  has  never  yet,  accord- 
ing to  Mm,  or  at  least  he  has  never,  accepted  the  responsibility  because 
he  is  a  musician.  We  cannot  accept  that  premise,  because  if  we 
accepted  his  premise,  we  would  have  no  internal  security. 

Mr.  Fraenkel.  The  Federal  statute  does  not  say  that  a  Communist 
may  not  play  in  an  orchestra. 

Mr.  Doyle.  We  know  that. 

Mr.  Arens.  But  this  resolution  was  trying  to  get  the  Communists 
out  of  the  orchestra ;  and  that  is  the  issue,  Counsel,  as  you  well  know. 

Now,  jNIr.  Walter,  you  have  said,  in  effect,  have  you  not,  that  you 
opposed  the  Dorn  resolution  because  it  dealt  with  the  question  of  a 
man's  political  belief,  isn't  that  correct  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Walter.  Yes,  among  other  things.  Yes.  There  were  other 
parts  to  that  resolution,  if  I  recall. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Would  you,  as  chairman  of  the  board  of  the  Symphony 
of  the  Air,  oppose  the  employment  of  a  musician  if  that  person  had 
been  identified  as,  and  known  by  you  to  have  been,  a  Communist? 

Mr.  Walter.  I  have  already  answered  that,  Mr.  Arens,  when  I  indi- 
cated that,  as  chairman,  I  had  nothing  to  do  with  hiring 

Mr.  Arexs.  I  didn't  ask  you  that  question,  and  you  are  being- 
evasive.  Would  you  have  opposed,  or  would  you  have  favored,  the 
employment  of  a  Communist  in  the  Symphony  of  the  Air? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Walter.  Excuse  me,  sir. 

(The  witness  conferred  witli  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Walter.  It  is  true  the  question  never  came  up. 

Mr.  Arexs.  All  right.  It  did  come  up  in  the  resolution.  Did  you, 
at  the  time  the  resolution  Avas  presented,  favor  tlie  resolution  which 
would  have  caused  the  expulsion  of  Communists,  known  Communists, 
from  the  Symphony  of  the  Air  ? 

Mr.  Fraexkel.  The  witness  has  twice  said  he  didn't. 

Mr.  Walter.  Yes,  sir.  I  have  answered  that,  haven't  I?  I  said 
I  opposed  the  resolution,  but  I  wanted  the  record  to  indicate  that  I 
thought  it  should  be  submitted  to  the  members. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Did  you  ever  submit  the  resolution  to  the  members? 

Mr.  Walter.  It  is  in  writing.  A  copy  of  that  went  to  every 
member. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Xo,  I  say  did  you  submit  the  resolution  to  the  members 
for  a  vote  when  you  were  chairman  of  the  meetings? 


740         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

Mr.  Walter.  As  to  that,  I  beg  you  to  go  to  the  minutes  of  the  meet- 
ings, because  I  don't  recall. 

Mr.  Doyle.  You  stated  that  it  was  finally  lost  under  the  table. 

Mr.  Walter.  No,  sir ;  that  is  not  the  same  resolution. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Did  the  membership  ever  vote  on  the  question  of  ex- 
pelling Communists  from  the  Symphony  of  the  Air? 

Mr.  Walter.  Not  to  my  recollection,  sir. 

Mr.  Arexs.  What  is  your  present  position  on  communism? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Walter.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  looked  througli  a  copy  of  the  Rules 
of  Procedure  which  was  given  me,  under  which  this  committee  op- 
erates; and  at  one  point,  it  said  the  committee  seeks  factual  testimony 
Avithin  the  personal  knowledge  of  the  witness.  By  no  stretch  of  my 
knowledge,  can  I  think  that  my  very  inexpert  opinion  on  political 
matters  or  even  governmental  or  other  such  civic  matters,  can  be 

^Ir.  Arens.  I  am  not  asking  you  about  govermnental  matters.  1 
am  asking  3'ou  about  a  conspiracy  called  the  Connnunist  Party.  I 
am  asking  you  what  is  your  present  position  on  connnunism — do  you 
favor  it  or  oppose  it  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  I  shall  oti'er  no  answer  to  that. 

Mr.  Arexs.  The  courts  have  repeatedly  stated  that  the  state  of  a 
man's  mind  is  as  much  a  fact  as  the  state  of  his  digestion. 

Mr.  Fraexkel.  That  becomes  true  only  in  relation  to  certain  acts 
which  are  not  here  in  question. 

Mr.  Arexs.  What  is  your  present  position  on  communism  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  The  same  answer  as  I  just  gave  to  the  same  question, 
sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  was  your  position  on  comnnmivSm  as  of  the  time 
you  were  chairman  of  the  board  of  Symphony  of  the  Air,  and  a 
number  of  people  had  been  accused  or  had  been  alleged  to  have  been 
Conmumists  in  that  organization  ?  What  was  your  position  then  on 
communism  ?    Were  you  opposed  to  it  or  were  you  for  it  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  I  must  give  the  same  answer. 

^Ir.  Arexs.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  the  witness 
be  ordered  and  directed  to  ansAver  that  question. 

Mr.  Walter.  And  I  appeal  to  the  chairman,  before  he  directs  irie 
to  answer  this,  to  educate  me  perhaps  as  to  the  meaning  of  the  words 
in  the  procedure. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Certainly  you,  as  a  leader  of  a  great  musical  organiza- 
tion— and  I  am  talking  to  you  now  as  an  individual — you  happened 
to  be  at  that  time  the  leader  of  a  great  musical  organization  in  our 
Nation.  We  are  investigating  here  you,  as  an  individual,  the  extent 
to  which  you  were  a  Communist ;  and  you  certainly  were  up  to  a  cer- 
tain time 

Mr.  Walter.  How  can  you  say  that  ? 

Mr.  Doyle.  Just  a  minute.  Well,  I  will  withdraw  that  statement, 
because  my  memory  is  not  clear  on  what  I  learned  from  this  witness 
previously.  For  the  present,  I  will  withdraw  that  statement.  But 
you  were,  at  least,  the  leader  of  a  great  musical  organization.  We 
know  that,  as  a  matter  of  fact,  some  members  of  your  organization 
were  Communists.    We  certainly  are  pertinent  in  our  question  when 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         741 

we  ask  you  the  extent  to  which  communism  was  known  to  you  to  be 
existent  in  that  orchestra,  of  which  you  were  chairman. 

Also,  3^our  position  on  communism  is  pertinent,  we  believe,  because 
you  were  chairman  of  the  organization.  That  may  lead  into  the  ques- 
tion of  whether  or  not  you  were  a  Communist  at  that  time.  If  you 
were,  it  is  further  evidence  of  the  extent  to  which  communism  was 
inhltrating  this  great  musical  organization,  if  you  were  a  Communist. 

AVe  have  several  members  of  your  organization  identified  as  Com- 
munists, as  you  know.  I  believe  it  is  entirely  pertinent.  I  instruct 
you  to  answer.  It  is  right  under  the  text  of  Public  Law  601  where 
we  are  challenged  to  go  into  the  extent  to  which  subversive  activities 
exist  in  any  organization.  We  are  not  investigating  your  orchestra; 
we  are  investigating  you,  as  to  what  you  think,  wliat  you  were. 

(At  tliis  point  Representative  Bernard  W.  Kearney  left  the  hear- 
ing room.) 

Mr.  Walter.  Mr.  Chairman,  to  the  extent  that  you  said  I  should 
have  been  interested  in  subversive  activities  in  my  organization,  not 
only  weren't  there  any  to  my  knowledge,  but  the  record  that  was 
achieved  for  this  country,  both  abroad  and  at  home,  was  tremendous ; 
and  I  offered  to  show  it  to  you  in  Washington,  and  you  seemed  to 
be  rather  disinterested  at  that  time.  We  have  received  commenda- 
tions from  every  government  in  the  world  that  the  Government  has 
friendship  with. 

Mr.  Doyle.  I  was  not  tit  all  disinterested.  But  when  the  Rooney 
Appropriations  Subcommittee  turned  you  down  on  a  second  trip  to 
the  Far  East  and  related  that  you  were  Communists 

Mr.  Walter.  Xo,  sir;  that  is  not  accurate. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Well,  when  the  Rooney  committee  called  your  attention 
to  the  fact  that  it  was  believed  that  there  were  active  Communists  in 
your  organization,  of  which  you  were  chairman,  you  certainly  then 
w^ere  challenged  with  being  interested  in  whether  or  not  you  had 
active  members  in  your  orchestra  as  Communists. 

(At  this  point  Representative  Bernard  W.  Kearney  returned  to 
the  hearing  room.) 

]Mr.  Walter.  May  I  state  for  tlie  record  that  the  State  Department, 
which  idtimately  covered  the  funds  for  our  initial  tour  and  which  was 
going  to  help  with  the  second  tour,  made  the  public  statements — and 
also  it  exists  in  many  letters  sent  to  individuals — that  no  charges  were 
made  by  them  against  the  orchestra  and  that  the  reason  for  the  can- 
cellation of  the  second  tour  was  threefold — the  evidence  of  some  fric- 
tion within  the  orchestra,  documented  in  the  Rooney  transcript;  the 
evidence  of  war  tensions  in  the  Near  East;  and  the  evidence  of 
difficulty  in  booking  in  India. 

Mr.  Doyle.  And  yet  you  went  down  to  Washington  and  asked  the 
State  Department  to  give  you  the  list  of  the  known  Communists  in 
your  orchestra? 

Mr.  Walter.  Yes,  sir;  and  we  were  refused  because  they  said  it 
wasn't  pertinent.  The  reason  for  the  cancellation  of  the  tour  had 
nothing  to  do  with  charges  against  the  orchestra. 

Mr.  Arexs.  William  Dorn,  who  introduced  this  resolution  to  oust 
Connnunists  from  the  Symphony  of  the  Air,  did  he  receive  any  em- 
])loyment  with  the  Symphony  of  the  Air  after  he  introduced  his 
resolution  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  I  don't  knoAv  the  date  of  the  resolution,  sir. 


742         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

Mr.  Arens.  Irrespective  of  the  date  of  the  resolution,  did  he  receive 
any  employment  with  the  Symphony  of  the  Air  after  he  proposed  the 
resolution  to  throw  the  Reds  out  of  the  Symphony  of  the  Air  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  If  you  could  tell  me  the  date,  I  could  answer  the 
question. 

Mr.  McIntosh.  While  you  are  looking  the  date  up,  could  we  pur- 
sue the  answer  to  the  question  that  tlie  witness  was  directed  to  answer 
before  this  colloquy  started  as  to  his  present  feeling? 

Mr.  Fraenkel.  He  refused  to  answer. 

Mr.  McIntosh.  On  what  grounds  ? 

Mr.  Fraenkel.  The  first  amendment  and  irrelevance. 

Mr.  Walter.  I  do  not  recall. 

Mr.  Fraenkel.  You  were  directed  to  answer  the  question  as  to 
what  your  present  opinion  about  communism  was. 

Mr.  Walter.  Yes,  and  I  thought  it  was  irrelevant,  and  I  i-efused  to 
answer  it  because  of  my  lack  of  expert  knowledge. 

Mr.  DoTLE.  And  I  instructed  you  to  answer  the  question.  So  that 
the  record  will  be  clear,  I  again  instruct  you  to  answer  that  question. 
So  that  you  will  have  a  clear  understanding,  I  told  you  that  I  be- 
lieved it  was  pertinent  and  relevant. 

Mr.  Walter.  Mr.  Chairman,  may  I  have  the  question  repeated  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Wliat  is  your  position  on  communism  ?  Are  you  for  it 
or  against  it? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Walter.  What  is  the  question  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  "Wliat  is  your  present  position  on  connnunism  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  I  refuse  to  answer  that  question  because  I  think  it  is 
irrelevant,  and  I  think  the  first  amendment  of  the  Constitution  pro- 
tects me  from  answering  that  question. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  not  invoking  the  fifth  amendment  on  that  ques- 
tion, is  that  correct  ? 

Mr.  Fraenkel.  That  is  right.  He  has  denied  present  membership 
in  the  Communist  Party. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  not  invoking  the  fifth  amendment  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  No,  sir;  I  am  not  invoking  the  fifth  amendment.  I 
see  no  reason  for  it. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  happened  to  William  Dorn,^  from  the  standpoint 
of  further  employment  with  the  Symphony  of  the  Air,  when  he  in- 
troduced in  August  1956,  his  resolution  to  throw  the  Communists  out 
of  the  Symphony  of  the  Air  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  Now,  I  know  the  date.  Actually,  the  resolution  was 
submitted  some  time  before  that;  and  lie  continued  to  be  employed 
with  the  orchestra  until  the  end  of  the  summer  that  year.  His  em- 
ployment was  discontinued  subsequently  for  matters  which  I  coidd 
only  discuss  at  the  risk  of  professional  repercussions  to  myself. 

I  must  explain  to  the  committee  that  musicians  within  the  frame- 
work of  our  union  are  not  allowed  to  discuss  artistic  opinions  about 
other  persons.  However,  it  was  the  consensus  of  management  officials 
and  otliers  that  there  should  have  been  some  artistic  adjustment  with- 
in our  orchestra ;  and  as  a  result  of  that,  and  for  no  other  reason,  Mr. 
Dorii's  employment  was  discontinued. 

JSIr.  Doyle.  How  long  had  he  been  a  member  of  the  orchestra  prior 
to  the  time  you  discontinued  him  ? 

1  See  footnote,  p.  744, 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         743 

Mr.  Walter.  From  the  inception,  which  was  October  of  1954.  He 
had  previously  played  for  a  few  years,  to  my  recollection,  with  the 
Toscanini  Orchestra. 

Mr.  Doyle.  In  other  words,  he  was  on  the  orchestra,  active  for  2 
years,  and  shortly  after  he  introduced  this  resolution,  he  was  discon- 
tinued. It  took  you  a  long-  time  to  discover  the  need  of  some  artistic 
adjustment. 

Mr.  Walter.  It  was  not  discovered  by  us.  It  was  discovered  by 
many  conductors  and  management  officials  that  worked  with  us.  If 
there  were  a  trial  procedure  here,  I  could  prove  to  you  exactly  what 
was  the  reason. 

Mr.  Arens.  Was  Mr.  Don  Gill  is  at  one  time  president  of  the  or- 
chestra ? 

Mr.  Walter.  Yes,  sir ;  he  was. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  did  he  in  1955,  just  before  the  orchestra  departed 
for  its  tour,  make  a  speech  in  which  he  condemned  Communists  and 
communism  and  said  they  ought  to  be  thrown  out  of  the  orchestra? 

]\Ir.  Walter.  I  don't  recall  that  of  my  knowledge,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  "Wliat  happened  to  Don  Gillis  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  Don  was  a  dear  friend  of  mine  and  a  dear  friend 
of  the  orchestra's.  He  served  it  nobly  and  very  well,  I  thought. 
There  was  a  situation  which  arose,  which  I  learned  afterw^ard  more 
about.  It  is  the  situation  that  exists  when  people  who  are  not  experts 
in  the  field — specifically  in  this  field,  musicians  running  a  corpora- 
tion and  foundation — begin  to  get  on  each  other's  nerves,  begin  to 
interfere  with  each  other;  and  there  was  a  difficulty  in  assessing 
responsibility  in  administration,  division  of  tasks,  and  so  on.  Mr. 
Gillis  subsequently  resigned  at  the  end  of  the  foreign  tour.  He  had 
announced  his  resignation  some  months  previously. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  he  resign  under  pressure? 

Mr.  Walter.  None  that  I  know  of,  sir;  but  I  was  not  a  member 
of  the  board  at  that  time,  and  I  don't  know. 

Mr.  Arens.  Was  there  a  person  by  the  nauie  of  Valerie  Tisliava 
who  was  a  secretary  in  the  administration  of  the  Symphony  of  the 
Air? 

Mr.  Walter.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Wliat  Avas  her  position  on  communism  in  the  Symphony 
of  the  Air  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  I  honestly  don't  know,  sir.  T  never  discussed  it  with 
her. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  she  ever  suggest  at  various  times  that  tlie  Com- 
munists ought  to  be  cleaned  out  of  the  Symphony  of  the  Air? 

Mr.  Walter.  Not  to  me,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  happened  to  Valerie  Tisliava  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  Miss  Tisliava,  to  use  a  less  than  fancy  w^ord — Miss 
Tisliava  left  our  employment  in  approximately  June  of  1956. 

Mr.  Arens.  Was  that  a  forced  departure  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  It  was  forced,  but  not  because  of  any  personal  con- 
siderations, but  because  of  our  need  for  bookkeeping  and  secretarial 
ability.  She  was  generally  quite  competent  as  a  secretarial  worker 
and  was  very  efficient  on  the  telei)hone  and  so  on.  We  had  a  need, 
however,  for  more  specialized  abilities  within  the  office.  There  was 
also  a  conflict  of  personalities,  based  on  nothing  more  than  that  be- 
tween her  and  1  or  2  people  in  the  office. 


744         COMMUNISM    IN   METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

Mr.  Arens.  Was  Samuel  Borodkin  ^  identified  in  any  capacity  with 
the  orchestra  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  Yes.  He  was,  like  Mr.  Dorn,  a  drummer  in  the 
orchestra. 

Mr,  Arens.  Was  he  vigorously  anti-Comnmnist  in  his  position 
within  the  orchestra  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  He  may  have  been.     I  never  discussed  it  with  him. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  happened  to  Mv.  Borodkin? 

Mr.  Walter,  Mr.  Borodkin  suffered  the  same  fate  as  Mr.  Dorn,^ 
namely,  there  were  substantial — and  I  am  under  oath  when  I  tell  you 
this,  and  I  know  all  these  things  to  be  true — there  were  substantial 
complaints  in  many  areas  of  our  activities  as  playing  musicians, 
whei-e  there  were  complaints  made  about  these  people.  I  made  no  such 
complaints  because  I  was  not  involved  in  the  personnel  or  artistic 
directorsliip,  but  such  complaints  were  made  by  conductors  and  by 
management  officials,  as  a  result  of  which  these  people  were  separated 
from  the  orchestra.  These  weren't  the  only  two  people,  by  the  way, 
sir. 

Mr.  Doyle.  How  many  years  had  this  last  named  gentleman  played 
with  the  orchestra  before  he  was  let  out  after  he  protested  against 
Communists  in  the  orchestra? 

Mr.  Fraenkel.  The  witness  has  already  said  that  he  didn't  know 
whether  this  man  protested  about  Communists. 

Mr.  Doyle.  How  long  had  he  played  with  the  orchestra  before  he 
was  let  out  ?     Let  us  put  it  that  way. 

Mr,  Walter,  From  shortly  after — well,  excuse  me.  I  remember 
roughly  it  was  probably  about  a  year  and  a  half.  He  was  brought  into 
membership  at  the  suggestion  of  Mr.  Gillis. 

Mr,  Arens,  And  he  played  for  Toscanini,  too,  did  he  not? 

Mr.  Walter.  As  what  we  used  to  call  an  extra  man.  That  is,  not 
a  regular  man,  Mv.  Doyle,  might  you  be  interested  to  know  how  many 
other  people  were  also  discontinued  for  artistic  reasons;  how  many 
retired  ? 

]\Ir.  Doyle.  I  question  that  these  people  were  dismissed  for  artistic 
I'easons.  I  question  it  very  much.  You  weren't  able  to  get,  and  you 
didn't  get  together,  a  quorum  of  that  orchestra  to  ever  consider  this 
matter.    You  stated  that  the  quorum  wasn't  present  for  three  meetings. 

Mr,  Walter.  Tliat  is  not  my  fault,  sir. 

Mr,  D0YI.E,  You  say  it  is  not  your  fault,  but  it  was  evidently  a  con- 
sidered plan  so  that  you  could  not  have  a  legal  quorum  present, 

Mv.  Walter,  On  the  contrary,  sir,  the  very  people  who  signed  the 
resolution  did  not  show  up  to  support  it  at  the  meeting. 

Mr.  Doyle.  I  undei'stand  that,  but  it  was  an  internal  situation  that 
Avas  not  good ;  and  on  the  basis  of  this  resolution,  you  should  have 
considered  it  and  should  have  had  a  qualified  meeting  and  should  have 
done  something  about  it. 

jNIr.  Walter.  I  can  say  nothing  more  than  that  I  agree  with  you. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Well,  why  do  you  not  do  it  now?  I  invite  you  to.  Go 
to  it  and  do  your  job  by  your  Nation.  If  you  have  a  bunch  of  Com- 
mies in  your  orchestra,  do  not  try  to  except  musicians  from  being  dis- 
ciplined.    They  should  be  treated  just  like  anybody  else.     If  they  are 


^Subsequent  to  the  hearings,  the  committee  received  copies  of  letters  addressed  to  Mr. 
Dorn  and  Mr.  Borodkin  by  the  Symphony  of  the  Air  refuting  the  testimony  of  Mr.  David 
Walter  concerning  charges  of  their  lack  of  artistic  ability.  (See  pp.  760  (1),  760  (2), 
and  760  (3). 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         745 

Communists,  they  ought  to  be  revealed  as  such  in  our  book.  No  matter 
who  they  are.  Why  do  you  not  go  ahead  and  see  that  there  is  a 
quormn  meeting  there,  and  consider  this  resohition  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  I  personally  have  attended  every  meeting  of  this 
organization,  sir, 

Mr.  Doyle.  Why  do  you  not  get  enougli  members  to  do  the  same 
thing  and  take  it  up,  instead  of  putting  it  under  the  table  ? 

Mr.  Walter.  I  am  not  in  a  position  to  do  it.  I  am  not  a  member 
of  the  board,  as  you  know. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Music  is  too  important  a  feature  in  our  national  life 
to  have  very  much  of  it  in  the  hands  of  people  who  are  disloyal  to 
our  form  of  government. 

Mr.  Walter.  Yes,  sir.  I  wish  that  you  would  consider  this  docu- 
ment which  states  that  we  did  an  A-1  job  for  this  Govermnent, 
rather  than  the  imputation  that  you  make  that  there  was  anything 
wrong  with  the  service  to  the  Government. 

Mr.  Doyle.  I  am  not  imputing  that.  I  am  saying,  however,  that 
I  think  the  record  shows  that  there  was  not  due  attention  given  to 
this  Dorn  resolution.  That  is  what  I  am  saying.  I  want  you  to 
know  that  we  are  deliberately  cutting  this  examination  of  you  short  be- 
cause you  have  an  important  professional  engagement  this  afternoon. 

Mr.  Walter.  I  appreciate  that,  and  I  want  to  thank  the  com- 
mittee for  that. 

Mr.  Doyle.  The  committee  will  now  recess  and  reconvene  at  2  p.  m. 
this  afternoon. 

Those  witnesses  under  subpena  who  were  not  called  this  morning 
will  report  back  to  this  room  at  that  time. 

(Whereupon,  at  12:40  p.  m.  Wednesday,  April  10,  1957,  the  sub- 
conunittee  recessed,  to  reconvene  at  2  p.  m.  the  same  day.  Present 
at  recess:  Representatives  Clyde  Doyle,  James  B.  Frazier,  Jr.,  Ber- 
nard W.  Kearney  and  Robert  J.  Mcintosh.) 

AFTERNOON  SESSION— WEDNESDAY,  APRIL  10,  1957 

The  subconunittee  reconvened  at  2  p.  m.,  Hon.  Clyde  Doyle,  pre- 
siding. Present  at  reconvening:  Representatives  Clyde  Doyle, 
James  B.  Frazier,  Jr.,  Beiniard  AY.  Kearney,  and  Robert  J.  Mcintosh. 

Mr.  Doyle.  The  committee  will  please  come  to  order.  Let  the 
record  show  that  Committee  Members  Frazier,  Kearney,  Mcintosh, 
and  Doyle  are  present,  i  of  the  5  members  of  the  subcommittee.  A 
quorum  is  present  and  we  will  proceed. 

Mr.  Arens.  Elayne  Jones,  kindly  come  forward. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Do  yon  solemnly  swear  that  you  will  tell  the  truth, 
the  whole  truth,  and  nothing  but  the  truth,  so  help  you  God? 

Miss  Jones.  I  do. 

TESTIMONY  OP  ELAYNE  JONES   (KAUFMAN),  ACCOMPANIED  BY 
COUNSEL,  MORTON  FRIEDMAN 

Mr.  Arens.  Kindly  identify  yourself  by  name,  residence,  and 
occupation. 

Miss  Jones.  Elayne  Jones,  112-30  Farmers  Boulevard,  St.  Albans, 
N.Y. 


746         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  appearing  here  today  in  response  to  a  sub- 
pena  which  was  served  upon  you  by  the  House  Committee  on  Un- 
American  Activities  ? 

Miss  Jones.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  represented  by  counsel  ? 

Miss  Jones.  I  am. 

Mr.  Arens.  Counsel,  kindly  identify  yourself. 

Mr.  Friedman.  Morton  Friedman,  16816  Liberty  Avenue. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  have  a  name  other  than  the  name  Elayne  Jones  ? 

Miss  Jones.  I  have.     Ehiyne  Kaufman. 

Mr.  Arens.  Will  you  keep  your  voice  up,  please  ? 

Miss  Jones.  Yes.     Elayne  Kaufman. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  are  you  employed  ? 

Miss  Jones.  I  am  unemployed  at  present. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  were  you  last  employed  ? 

Miss  Jones.  The  last  job  I  had  was — do  you  want  the  date  or  just 
the  job  I  had? 

Mr.  Arens.  Tell  us  just  the  job  you  had  first,  please. 

Miss  Jones.  Well,  I  played  City  Center. 

Mr.  Arens.  ^Ylmt  did  you  play  at  City  Center? 

Miss  Jones.  In  the  orchestra. 

]\ir.  Arens.  What  instrument  did  you  play  ? 

Miss  Jones.  Tympani. 

Mr.  Arens.  When  was  that;  in  the  last  year? 

IVIiss  Jones.  No.     It  was  about  2  or  3  weeks  ago. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  a  professional  musician  ? 

Miss  Jones.  I  hope  so.     I  consider  myself  so. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  been  connected  witli  the  Metropolitan 
Music  School  ? 

Miss  Jones.  I  have. 

Mr.  Arens.  In  what  capacity  ? 

JSIiss  Jones.  Well,  sort  of  nebulous.  I  am  supposed  to  be  an  in- 
structor. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  an  instructor  ? 

Miss  Jones.  I  never  had  any  students. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  listed  as  a  member  of  the  faculty  ? 

Miss  Jones.  Yes ;  I  was. 

Mr.  Arens.  Over  what  period  of  time  were  you  listed  as  a  member 
of  the  faculty  ? 

Miss  Jones.  I  can't  remember  how  long. 

Mr.  Arens.  Well,  were  you  listed  as  long  as  4  or  5  years  ? 

Miss  Jones.  Probably. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  presently  listed  as  a  member  of  the  faculty  ? 

Miss  Jones.  I  think  I  am. 

Mr.  Arens.  For  how  long  have  you  been  listed  as  a  member  of  the 
faculty  ?     You  say  you  are  presently  listed  as  a  member. 

Miss  Jones.  That  is  what  I  said.     I  can't  remember  how  long. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  listed  as  a  member  of  the  faculty  as  far  back 
as  1950? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  comisel.) 

Miss  Jones.  Well,  if  according  to  your  records  I  have  been  listed, 
then  I  have  been. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  been  connected  with  the  Symphony  of 
the  Air? 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         747 

Miss  Jones.  What  do  you  mean  by  "connected"  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  In  any  capacity  ?  Have  you  played  on  the  Symphony 
of  the  Air?  Have  you  been  a  member  of  the  orchestra?  Have  you 
been  working  for  them  in  any  capacity  ? 

Miss  Jones.  There  is  a  difference.  You  can  be  a  member  or  you 
can  play.    I  played  once  for  them. 

Mr.  Akens.  Are  you  on  the  persomiel  list  of  the  Symphony  of  the 
Air? 

Miss  Jones.  What  do  you  mean  by  the  "list"  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  The  list  of  personnel  approved  to  play  on  the 
orchestra. 

Miss  Jones.  I  don't  know. 

Mr.  Arens.  When  did  you  play  for  the  Symphony  of  the  Air? 

Miss  Jones.  Last  year.    No.    Yes ;  it  was  last  year. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  did  you  play  for  the  Symphony  of  the  Air  ? 

Miss  Jones.  At  Carnegie  Hall. 

Mr.  Arens.  Who  engaged  you  to  play  at  the  Symphony  of  the  Air  ? 

Miss  Jones.  Philip  Sklar,  the  late  Philip  Sklar. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  played  the  New  York  City  Opera 
Orchestra  ? 

Miss  Jones.  Yes ;  I  have. 

Mr.  Arens.  When  was  that  ? 

Miss  Jones.  The  last  time  I  played  there  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Yes. 

Miss  Jones.  It  was  just  the  job  I  did  a  couple  of  weeks  ago. 

Mr.  Arens.  Over  what  course  of  time  have  you  played  the  New 
York  City  Opera  Orchestra  ? 

Miss  Jones.  Since  1949. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  now,  or  have  you  ever  been,  a  member  of  the 
Communist  Party  ? 

Miss  Jones.  I  decline  to  answer. 

Mr.  Arens.  Why? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Jones.  I  would  like  to  read  my  statement,  please. 

I  refuse  to  answer  the  question  on  the  ground  tliat  it  has  no  proper 
legislative  purpose,  nor  has  this  entire  investigation  of  musicians 
any  proper  legislative  purpose.  It  is  impossible  for  there  to  be  any- 
thing un-American  about  various  forms  of  music  or  in  any  way  in 
which  it  is  played  or  by  whom  it  is  played. 

Furthermore,  the  question  isn't  proper  in  that  it  has  no  relevance  to 
the  subject  matter  under  investigation.  I  refuse  to  answer  the 
question  on  the  further  grounds  that  it  violates  my  constitutional 
rights  of  freedom  of  association,  of  conscience,  freedom  of  thought, 
and,  furthermore,  because  no  person  may  be  required  to  be  a  witness 
against  himself. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  write  that  or  did  someone  else  write  it  ? 

Miss  Jones.  I  wrote  that  with  the  help  of  my  counsel. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  j^ou  now  a  Communist  ? 

Miss  Jones.  I  refuse  to  answer  it  on  the  same  grounds  I  have  just 
outlined  to  you. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  connected,  or  have  you  been  connected,  in  any 
capacity  with  Camp  Unity  ? 

Miss  Jones.  No,  I  am  not,  sir. 


74S         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

iNIr.  Arexs.  Have  you  ever  been  on  the  social  statf  of  Camp  Unity? 

( The  witness  conferred  with  her  counseL ) 

Miss  JoxES.  I  refuse  to  answer  that  question  on  the  same  grounds. 

Mr.  Arens.  We  will  display  to  you  now,  if  you  please,  a  thermofax 
reproduction  of  the  Communist  Daily  Worker  of  June  15,  1951,  in 
which  your  name  appears  in  the  publication  as  a  member  of  the  social 
staff  of  Camp  Unity. 

(The  document  was  handed  to  the  witness.) 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  while  the  witness  is  examining  the  docu- 
ment, I  respectfully  suggest  that  the  record  at  this  point  reflect  the 
citation  of  Camp  Unity  contained  in  the  Guide  to  Subversive  Organi- 
zations by  this  committee. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Very  well. 

Camp  Unity  (  Wingdale,  N.  Y.  ) 

1.  Cited  as  a  *  *  *  "notorious  Communist  rendezvous"  *  *  *.  {Committee  on 
Un-American  Activities,  Annual  Report  for  1955,  H.  R.  1648,  January  17,  1956, 
originally  released  January  11, 1956,  pp.  9  and  10.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Does  that  exhibit  refresh  your  recollection  with  ref- 
erence to  your  connection  with  Camp  Unity  ? 

Miss  Jones.  Yes ;  it  does. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  say,  "Yes ;  it  does"  'I 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Jones.  I  don't  understand. 

Mr.  Arens.  Does  this  exhibit  prompt  your  recollection  with  ref- 
erence to  your  connection  with  Camp  Unity  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

INIiss  Jones.  I  refuse  to  answer  that  question  on  the  same  grounds  as 
I  stated  before. 

(Document  marked  "Jones  Exhibit  No.  1,"  and  retained  in  committee 
files.) 

]Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  occasionally  entertain  under  the  auspices  of  the 
Jefferson  School  of  Social  Science  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel. ) 

Miss  Jones.  I  refuse  to  answer  that  question. 

Mr.  Arens.  We  exhibit  to  you  now  a  thermofax  reproduction  of  a 
bulletin,  the  face  slieet  of  a  bulletin,  of  the  Jefferson  School  of  Social 
Science  listing  you  as  one  of  the  entertainers  on  the  program  given  on 
the  evening  of  March  10,  1951. 

Would  3'ou  kindly  look  at  that  and  see  if  that  refreshes  your  recol- 
lection with  reference  to  your  connection  with  that  activity  or  enter- 
prise ? 

(The  document  was  handed  to  the  witness.) 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  Jones.  What  would  you  like  to  loiow  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Does  this  exhibit  refresh  your  recollection  with  refer- 
ence to  your  participation  as  an  entertainer  under  the  auspices  of  the 
Jefferson  School  of  Social  Science? 

Miss  Jones.  I  refuse  to  answer  that  question  on  the  same  grounds. 

( Document  previously  identified  as  "Smyles  Exhibit  No.  3,"  retained 
in  committee  files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  recall  any  connection  you  may  have  had  with 
the  New  York  Council  of  the  Arts,  Sciences,  and  Professions? 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         749 

Miss  Jones.  Xo;  I  don't  remember. 

Mr.  Arexs.  "We  lay  before  you  now  a  call  to  a  conference  mider  the 
auspices  of  the  Xew  York  Council  of  the  Arts,  Sciences,  and  Pro- 
fessions on  which  your  name  appears  as  one  of  those  sending  out  the 
call,  Miss  Elayne  V.  Jones. 

Kindl}'  look  at  this  document,  while  it  is  displayed  to  you,  and  see 
if  you  can't  help  this  committee  as  to  whether  or  not  it  refreshes  your 
recollection  as  to  any  connection  you  may  have  had  with  that  organ- 
ization. 

(The  document  was  handed  to  the  witness.) 

(The  witness  conferred  with  her  counsel.) 

Miss  JoxES.  On  that  I  refuse  to  answer  on  the  same  grounds. 

(Document  marked  "Jones  Exhibit  Xo.  2'*  and  retained  in  Com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  been  one  of  the  sponsors  of  the  National 
Committee  to  Secure  Justice  in  the  Rosenberg  Case  ? 

Miss  Jones.  Xot  that  I  know  of,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  recall  attending  a  rally  of  the  Xational  Com- 
mittee to  Secure  Justice  for  the  Rosenbergs  in  the  fall  of  1953  ? 

Miss  Jones.  Where  was  that  held  at? 

Mr.  Arens.  In  the  Tri-Borough  Stadium  on  Randall's  Island. 

Miss  Jones.  I  don't  recall. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  will  con- 
clude the  staff  interrogation  of  this  witness. 

Mr.  Doyle.  If  there  are  no  questions  from  members  of  the  subcom- 
mittee, the  witness  is  excused. 

Call  your  next  witness. 

Mr.  Arens.  Sam  Morgenstern. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Do  you  solenmly  swear  to  tell  the  truth,  the  whole  truth, 
and  nothing  but  the  truth,  so  help  you  God? 

Mr.  Morgenstern.  Tliank  you. 

TESTIMONY  OF  SAM  MORGENSTEEN,  ACCOMPANIED  BY  COUNSEL, 
LEONARD  B.  BOUDIN 

Mr.  Arens.  Kindly  identify  yourself  by  name,  residence,  and  occu- 
pation. 

Mr.  Morgenstern.  Sam  Morgenstern,  40  Horatio  Street ;  musician. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  appearing  today,  Mr.  Morgenstern,  in  response 
to  a  subpena  which  was  served  upon  you  by  the  House  Committee  on 
Un-American  Activities  ? 

Mr.  Morgenstern.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  represented  by  counsel? 

Mr.  Morgenstern.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  Counsel,  kindly  identify  yourself. 

Mr.  BouDiN.  Leonard  B.  Boudin,  25  Broad  Street. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  are  you  employed,  ]Mr.  Morgenstern? 

Mr.  Morgenstern.  I  am  self-employed. 

Mr.  Arens.  AMiere? 

Mr.  Morgenstern.  At  my  address. 

]VIr.  Arens.  In  what  type  of  work  ? 

Mr.  Morgenstern.  I  coach  singers  for  opera  and  concert. 

Mr.  Arens.  How  long  have  you  been  engaged  in  that  type  of  work  ? 

91198— 57— .pt.  1 11 


750         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

Mr.  MoRGENSTERN.  I  caii't  recall.     For  quite  a  number  of  years. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  been  connected  with  the  Metropolitan 
Music  School  ? 

Mr.  MoRGENSTERN.  Yes. 

Mr.  Arens.  Over  what  period  of  time  and  in  what  capacity  ? 

Mr.  MoRGENSTERN.  I  canuot  recall  what  period  of  time  it  was,  but 
I  taught  harmony,  counterpoint,  and  some  composition. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  been  on  the  board  of  directoi-s  of  the 
Metropolitan  Music  School  ? 

Mr.  MoRGENSTERN.  I  doii't  recall. 

Mr.  Arens.  Well,  in  1946  weren't  you  on  the  faculty  of  the  Metro- 
politan Music  School  ? 

Mr.  MoRGENSTERN.  It  is  possible. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  lay  before  you  the  bulletin  of  the  Metropolitan  Music 
School,  a  photostatic  reproduction,  for  1946-47,  in  which  your  name 
appears  as  a  member  of  the  faculty. 

Kindly  look  at  that  and  see  if  that  refreshes  your  recollection. 

(The  document  was  handed  to  the  witness.) 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  MoRGENSTERN.  I  dou't  recall. 

(Document  marked  "Morgenstern  Exhibit  No.  1,"  and  retained  in 
committee  files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  currently  a  sponsor  of  the  Metropolitan  Music 
School  ? 

Mr.  MoRGENSTERN.  I  wouldu't  know.  I  haven't  looked  at  the  bul- 
letins. 

Mr.  Arens.  May  I  invite  your  attention  to  the  1956-57  bulletin 
of  the  Metropolitan  Music  School,  in  which  your  name  appears  as 
a  sponsor  ? 

Kindly  look  at  that,  if  you  will,  and  tell  this  committee  if  it  re- 
freshes your  recollection. 

(The  document  was  handed  to  the  witness.) 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  MoRGENSTERN.  Presumably  1  am  a  sponsor,  since  my  name  is 
there. 

(Document  previously  identified  as  "Schwartz  Exhibit  No.  1,"  re- 
tained in  committee  files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  now,  or  have  you  ever  been,  a  member  of  the 
Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  MoRGENSTERN.  I  am  not  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  MoRGENSTERN.  I  rcspectfully  decline  to  answer  on  the  grounds 
of  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  1  year 
ago? 

Mr.  MoRGENSTERN.  No. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  5  years 
ago? 

Mr.  MoRGENSTERN.  No. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  any  time 
within  the  last  10  years? 

Mr.  MoRGENSTERN.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  grounds  of  the  fifth 
amendment. 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         751 

Mr.  Arens,  Were  j'oii  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  8  years 
ago? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counseL) 

Mr.  MoRGENSTERN.  I  decline  to  answer  that  on  the  grounds  of  the 
fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  a  member  of  the  Communist  Part}^  7  years 
ago? 

Mr,  MoRGENSTERN.  I  decline  to  ansAver  on  the  grounds  of  the  fifth 
amendment. 

Mr.  Arens,  Six  years  ago  ? 

Mr.  MoRGENSTERN.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  grounds  of  (he  fifth 
amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  presently  under  Comnnmist  Party  discipline? 

Mr.  Morgenstern.  No. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  ever  live  at  601  West  143d  Street  ? 

Mr.  MoRGENsn:RN.  No. 

Mr.  Arens.  "WHien  were  you  last  in  active  status  at  the  Metropolitan 
Music  School? 

Mr.  ]MoRGENSTERN.  I  Cannot  recall  the  j'ear.  It  is  quite  some  time 
ago.    I  don't  recall. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  requested  that  your  name  be  disasso- 
ciated or  taken  off  of  the  register  of  the  Metropolitan  Music  School, 
official  roster? 

Mr.  Morgenstern.  As  I  said,  I  wasn't  aware  that  it  was  on  any 
more,  so  consequently,  I  never  thought  about  it. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  is  your  position  now  with  reference  to  com- 
munism ?    Are  you  opposed  to  it  or  are  you  not  opposed  to  it  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Morgenstern.  I  decline  to  answer  that  on  the  grounds  of  the 
first  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens,  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  the  witness  be 
ordered  and  directed  to  answer  that  question. 

Mr.  BouDiN.  Mr,  Chairman,  perhaps  the  question  should  be  re- 
peated before  you  make  your  ruling.  It  referred  not  to  activity,  but 
to  belief,  if  you  will  recall. 

Mr.  Doyle.  For  the  convenience  of  everyone,  will  the  question 
please  be  read  ? 

(The  pending  question  was  read  by  the  reporter.) 

Mr.  D0Y1.E.  "V^Tiat  was  your  answer,  Witness  ? 

Mr.  BouDiN,  The  witness  had  not  answered, 

Mr.  Doyle.  Just  u  minute.     A\niat  was  your  answer.  Witness  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel,) 

Mr.  Morgenstern.  My  answer  is  I  decline  on  the  grounds  of  the 
first. 

Mr.  Doyle.  I  direct  you  to  answer  the  question. 

Mr.  Morgenstern.  I  decline  on  the  grounds  of  the  fifth  amend- 
ment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  written  Hamis  Eisler  Songs? 

Mr.  Morgenstern.  Pardon  me,  sir? 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  written  a  publication  called  Hanns  Eisler 
Songs? 

Mr.  BouDiN.  I  think  the  pronunciation 

Mr.  Arens.  Counsel,  no  man  has  been  before  tliis  committee  as 
much  as  you ;  and  no  one  is  more  familiar  with  the  rules  of  this  com- 
mittee than  you. 


752         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN   MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

Do  you  know  whether  or  not  you  have  authored  a  publication  called 
Hanns  Eisler  Songs  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  MoRGENSTERN.  I  decline  on  the  grounds  of  the  first  and  fifth 
amendments. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  lay  before  you  now  a  photostatic  reproduction  of  the 
Communist  Daily  Worker  of  Tuesday,  November  11,  1947,  with  refer- 
ence to  a  "Freedom  of  Assembly  Rally"  at  ]\Ianhattan  Center,  here  in 
New  York  City.  Part  of  the  program  consists  of  "Hanns  Eisler  Songs 
rendered  by  Robert  Penn  and  Sam  Morgenstern."' 

Would  you  look  at  that  exhibit  and  see  if  that  refreshes  your  recol- 
lection with  reference  to  this  publication  Hanns  Eisler  Songs? 

(The  document  was  handed  to  the  witness.) 

(Tlie  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Morgenstern.  I  decline  to  answer  that  on  the  grounds  of  the 
first  and  fifth  amendments. 

(Document  marked  "Morgensteni  Exhibit  No.  2,"  and  retained  in 
committee  files.) 

Mr.  BouDiN.  Could  it  be  understood,  Mr.  Chairman,  that  when  the 
witness  declines,  it  will  be  on  those  two  grounds,  so  that  he  need  not 
repeat  it  ? 

Mr.  Doyi.E.  I  think  his  answer  is  very  brief.  We  will  let  him 
answer  and  make  his  claim  to  his  constitutional  privileges.  He  has 
been  very  brief  in  claiming  them. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  one  of  the  sponsors  of  the  conference  blasting 
the  trial  of  the  indicted  Communist  leaders  in  New  York  City  in 
January  1949  ? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Morgenstern.  I  decline  to  answer  that  on  the  grounds  of  the 
first  and  fifth  amendments,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  We  lay  before  you  now  a  photostatic  reproduction  of 
the  Communist  Daily  Worker  of  January  31,  1949,  in  which  your 
name  appears  as  one  of  such  sponsors. 

Kindly  look  at  that  document  and  tell  us  whether  or  not  it  refreshes 
your  recollection  and  also  whether  or  not,  to  your  certain  knowledge, 
that  gives  an  accurate  reporting  of  the  facts. 

(The  document  was  handed  to  the  witness.) 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Morgenstern,  I  decline  to  answer  that  on  the  grounds  of  the 
first  and  fifth  amendments. 

(Document  marked  "Morgenstern  Exhibit  No.  3,"  and  retained  in 
committee  files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  will  conclude 
the  staff  interrogation  of  this  witness. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Are  there  any  questions  from  members  of  the  subcom- 
mittee?   If  not,  that  will  be  all.    Thank  you.    The  witness  is  excused. 

Mr.  Arens.  Max  Hollander,  kindly  come  forward. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Do  you  solemnly  swear  to  tell  the  truth,  the  whole  truth, 
and  nothing  but  the  truth,  so  help  you  God  ? 

Mr.  Hollander.  I  do. 


COMIVIUNISM    IN   METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         753 

TESTIMONY  OF  MAX  HOLLANDER,   ACCOMPANIED  BY  COUNSEL, 

EPHEAIM  LONDON 

Mr.  Arens.  Kindly  identify  yourself  by  name,  residence,  and  occu- 
pation. 

Mr.  Hollander.  My  name  is  Max  Hollander.  I  am  a  musician. 
I  live  at  191-48  Foothill  Avenue,  Hollis,  Long  Island. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  appearing  today,  Mr.  Hollander,  in  response 
to  a  subpena  which  was  served  upon  you  by  the  House  Committee  on 
Un-American  Activities? 

Mr.  Hollander.  That  is  correct,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  And  you  are  represented  by  counsel  ? 

Mr.  Hollander.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  Counsel,  will  you  kindly  identify  yourself? 

Mr.  London.  Ephraim  London,  l.")0  Broadway,  New  York  City. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  are  you  employed,  Mr.  Hollander? 

Mr.  Hollander.  I  am  a  free-lance  musician.  I  work  at  various 
times  at  the  various  radio  stations  in  Xew  York,  at  various  times  at 
the  recording  studios,  at  various  times  at  whatever  other  professional 
jobs  may  come  to  me  over  the  telephone.  I  have  no  regular  employ- 
ment. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  are  some  of  the  principal  employments  which 
you  have  had  in  the  last  several  months  ? 

Mr.  Hollander.  I  have  worked  for  various  recording  companies, 
such  as  Decca,  MGJNI.  I  have  worked  for  Firestone,  programing  the 
orchestra,  and  things  of  that  nature.  It  is  impossible  to  go  into  all, 
because  I  have  worked  for  so  many. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  been  engaged  by  the  S.ymphony  of  the  Air  ? 

Mr.  Hollander.  I  haven't.  This  is  a  long  story.  I  am  a  charter 
member  of  the  Symphony  of  the  Air,  but  I  have  not  played  with  the 
Symphony  of  the  Air  for  some  period  prior  to  their  oriental  trip. 
Since  then,  I  have  not  played  with  them. 

Mr.  Arens.  About  when  was  that?  Just  your  best  appraisal  or 
judgment. 

Mr.  Hollander.  As  I  remembei-,  they  were  organized  some  time 
in  1954.  I  did  not  join  them  until  about  9  months  afterward.  Then 
I  was  with  them  for  a  short  period  of  probably — it  is  hard  to  say,  but 
of  all  the  hundreds  of  concerts  they  have  done  and  hundreds  of  appear- 
ances, I  may  have  had  six,  and  only  in  the  very  first  little  period. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  been  connected  with  the  Metropolitan  Music 
School  ? 

Mr.  Hollander.  I  have,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  In  what  capacit}^  ? 

]Mr.  Hollander.  I  have  been  a  sponsor. 

jMr.  Arens.  Are  you  presently  a  sponsor  ? 

]\Ir.  Hollander.  I  am  so  listed. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  now,  or  have  you  ever  been,  a  member  of  the 
Communist  Party? 

Mr.  Hollander.  I  am  not  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  H0L1.AXDER.  I  must  decline  on  tlie  basis  of  the  fifth  amendmeiit. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  1  year 
ago  ? 

Mr.  Hollander.  No,  sir. 


754         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN   MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  3'ou  a  member  of  the  Conmiunist  Party  5  years 
ago? 

Mr.  Hollander.  I  must  decline  on  the  basis  of  the  fifth  amendment. 
Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  4  years 


ago 


Mr.  Hollander.  I  must  decline  on  the  same  basis. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  3  years 


ago 


Mr.  Hollander.  I  must  decline  on  the  same  basis. 

Mr.  Arens.  Tm'o  years  ago  ? 

Mr.  Hollander.  I  must  decline  on  the  same  basis. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  a  year 
and  a  half  ago? 

Mr.  Hollander.  I  must  decline  to  answer  on  the  same  basis. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  under  Communist  Party  discipline  ? 

Mr.  Hollander.  Xo,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  you  under  Commmiist  Party  discipline  a  year 
and  a  half  ago  ? 

Mr.  Hollander.  I  must  decline  to  answer  that  on  the  basis  of  the 
fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  appeared  in  the  course  of  the  last  few  years 
under  the  auspices  of  the  New  York  Council  of  the  Arts,  Sciences,  and 
Professions  ? 

Mr.  Hollander.  Not  to  my  knowledge,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  lay  before  you  now"  a  thermofax  reproduction  of  the 
Communist  Daily  Worker  of  November  12,  1954,  in  which  a  concert 
is  announced  featuring  Max  Hollander,  violinist,  as  part  of  the  pro- 
gram of  the  New  York  Council  of  the  Arts,  Sciences,  and  Professions, 
153  West  64th  Street. 

Kindly  look  at  that  and  see  if  that  refreshes  3^our  recollection. 

(The  document  was  handed  to  the  witness. ) 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel. ) 

Mr.  Hollander.  This  cannot  refresh  my  recollection  because  I 
played  no  such  concert. 

(Document  marked  "Hollander  Exhibit  No.  1,"  and  retained  in 
committee  files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  appeared,  given  concerts,  under  the  auspices 
of  the  School  of  Jewish  Studies  in  the  course  of  the  last  few  years? 

Mr.  Hollander.  I  don't  recall,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  We  display  to  you  now  a  thermofax  reproduction  of 
an  announcement  in  the  Communist  Daily  Worker  (March  30,  1948, 
p.  5),  to  the  effect  that  there  will  be  a  concert  at  the  School  of  Jewish 
Studies  in  Avhich  the  artists  listed  include  Max  Hollander. 

Look  at  that  and  see  if  that  refreshes  your  recollection. 

(The  document  was  handed  to  the  witness.) 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Hollander.  It  is  possible,  sir,  but  I  don't  remember.  Being 
a  violinist  of  certain  stature,  I  have  played  concerts  a  great  deal,  and 
I,  as  a  rule,  have  not  asked  where  the  job  comes  from.  May  I  elaborate, 
if  I  may,  sir? 

Jobs,  as  a  rule,  come  through  the  telephone,  and  haA^e  to  go  through 
the  union  somehow.  One  accepts  a  job  and  does  not  ask  who  is  the 
employer,  but  one  finds  out  who  has  hired  him.    In  effect,  that  par- 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         755 

ticular  person  acts  as  a  contractor.  I  have  no  recollection  of  having 
played  a  concert  for  a  Jewish  school.    I  may  have,  sir. 

(Document  marked  "Hollander  Exhibit  No.  2,"  and  retained  in 
committee  files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  You  know  the  School  of  Jewish  Studies  has  been  re- 
peatedly cited  as  a  Communist-controlled  outfit ;  do  you  not  ? 

Mr.  HoLLAXDER.  I  didn't  know  there  Avas  such  a  school. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  that  the  other  institution,  the  Jefferson 
School  of  Social  Science,  is  a  Communist-controlled  organization? 

(The  witness  conferred  Avith  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Hollander.  I  understand,  up  to  this  point,  that  it  has  been 
on  the  Attorney  General's  list. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  union  are  you  identified  Avith  ?  You  spoke  about 
the  union. 

]Mr.  Hollander.  I  belong  to  Local  802. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  Earl  Browder  ? 

Mr.  Hollander.  I  know  the  name. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  knoAv  him  in  any  other  capacity  ? 

Mr.  Hollander.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  liA^e  in  Queens? 

Mr.  Hollander.  I  do,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  were  at  one  time  an  ace  recruiter  for  the  Com- 
munist Party  in  Queens,  Avere  you  not  ? 

ISIr,  Hollander.  I  must  decline  under  the  basis  of  the  fifth  amend- 
ment, sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  is  your  present  position  on  communism?  Are 
5'ou  for  it  or  against  it '? 

Mr.  Hollander.  I  am  against  it,  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  Hoav  long  have  you  maintained  that  position? 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Hollander.  I  think  I  sliall  have  to  decline  to  ansAver  that  on 
the  basis  of  my  rights  under  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  If  you  are  against  communism,  wouldn't  you  want  to 
help  a  committee  of  the  Congress  undertaking  to  develop  the  factual 
information  to  help  protect  this  country  against  the  Communist 
menace  ? 

Mr.  Hollander.  I  avouIcI  help  all  connnittees  to  the  extent  that  any 
personal  principles  and  beliefs  run  parallel  Avith  the  aims  of  the 
committee. 

*  *  *  *  !i:  *  * 

Mr.  Arens.  Let  me  ask  you  this:  If  this  connnittee,  Mr.  Hollander, 
should  initiate  proceedings  to  grant  you  an  immunity  of  any  pos- 
sible criminal  prosecution  as  a  result  of  testimony  which  you  would 
give  before  this  committee  on  the  subject  of  conmiunism,  would  you 
accept  that  immunity  and  testify  fully  and  freely  and  serve  your 
Government  by  giving  us  such  information  as  you  may  have  on  this 
subject? 

(The  witness  conferred  Avith  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Holl.\nder.  I  believe  that  is  a  hypothetical  question.  I  don't 
know  how  to  ansAver  such  a  hypothetical  question.  I  am  not  prepared 
to  ansAver  that  at  present.  1  liave  tried  to  answer  facts  according  to 
my  rights  and  beliefs. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  respectfully  suggest  that  will  con- 
clude the  staff  interrogation  of  this  Avitness. 


756         COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

Mr.  DoTXE.  I  somehow  have  a  feeling  that  you  would  like  to  help 
your  Government  through  this  committee  or  some  other  cliannel,  even 
to  the  point  of  giving  to  the  Government  information  that  might  help 
us  legislate  more  effectively  in  this  field. 

I  want  to  urge  that  you  think  of  that  suggestion  seriously.  Natu- 
rally, you  will  follow  the  advice  of  your  distinguished  counsel.  I 
am  not  trying  to  embarrass  you  or  him. 

I  did  notice  that  you  made  it  very  clear  that  you  had  no  Communist 
Party  affiliations  during  the  last  12  months.  I  notice  you  hesitated 
quite  a  little  bit,  quite  a  few  seconds,  when  counsel  asked  if  you  were 
a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  2  years  ago,  before  you  claimed 
your  privilege. 

May  I  ask  you  this :  In  the  last  12  months,  have  you  had  any  con- 
nection, directly  or  indirectly,  with  the  Communist  Party  or  Commu- 
nist Party  agents,  or  leaders,  trying  to  induce  you  to  join  or  keep  any 
identification,  if  you  ever  had  any,  with  the  party  ? 

Mr.  Hollander.  Sir,  your  question,  I  believe,  assumes  that  I  would 
be  in  a  position  to  know  who  might  be  Communist  leaders,  agents,  or 
others. 

Mr.  Doyle.  Well,  if  you  laiow, 

Mr.  Hollander.  But  I  definitely  have  not  been  in  any  way,  manner, 
or  form  connected  in  either  deed  or  thought  with  any  Communist 
activities. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  there  persons  presently  in  the  music  entertainment 
field  who  are  known  by  you  to  liave  been  members  of  the  Communist 
Party  in  the  course  of  the  last  2  or  3  years  ? 

Mr.  Hollander.  Sir,  again  I  feel  that  your  question 

Mr.  Arens.  In  other  words,  can  you  right  now,  this  instant,  tell  this 
committee,  with  a  moral  certainty,  the  names  of  any  persons  in  the 
last  couple  of  years,  in  the  entertainment  industry  who  were  Com- 
munists ? 

Mr.  Hollander.  I  haven't  the  slightest  idea  who  might  be  a  Com- 
munist today  in  the  entertainment  field. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  didn't  ask  you  that. 

Mr.  Hollander.  In  the  music  field. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  didn't  ask  you  that.  Can  you  right  this  instant  tell 
the  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities  the  names  of  people,  musi- 
cians, who,  to  your  certain  knowledge,  in  the  course  of  the  last  2  or  3 
years,  have  been  Communists  ? 

Mr.  Hollander.  I  cannot,  because  the  question  assumes  that  I  know 
such  people ;  and  I  do  not  know  such  people. 

Mr.  D0Y1.E.  I  wish  to  say,  before  you  are  dismissed,  I  somehow  feel 
you  are  being  frank  and  trying  to  be  helpful. 

Mr.  Hollander.  I  am  being  perfectly  frank,  sir. 

Mr.  DoTLE,  That  is,  as  to  your  lack  of  knowledge  within  the  last 
year.  I  want  to  compliment  you  for  being  in  the  position  which  I 
believe  you  are  in,  of  being  honest  and  frank  under  oath  that  you  are 
not  now  a  Communist  and  that  you  had  no  connection  with  it  in  the 
last  year.  I  am  not  assuming  or  making  the  statement  that  you  ever 
were  a  Commimist,  but  I  did  notice  that  you  fixed  a  deadline  of  a  year. 
I  want  to  compliment  you  on  not  being  in  the  position  where  you 
have  to  plead  the  fifth  amendment  as  of  today. 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         757 

The  thing  that  amazes  me  is  how  any  patriotic  American  can  pos- 
sibly come  before  this  committee  and  be  in  a  position  where  he  or  she 
has  to  plead  the  amendment  as  of  today.  Why  can  they  not  get  out 
of  that  garbage  and  come  as  you  have  come  and  say,  "I  am  not  a  mem- 
ber of  the  Communist  Party  today,"  but  then  fix  a  deadline  as  you 
have  fixed. 

The  witness  is  dismissed. 

Mr.  Arens.  The  next  witness,  if  you  please,  Mr.  Chairman,  will  be 
Mr.  Alan  Booth. 

Please  come  forward. 

Mr.  Doyle.  The  witness  will  please  raise  his  right  hand. 

Do  you  solemnly  swear  to  tell  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and  nothing 
but  the  truth,  so  help  you  God  'i 

Mr.  Booth.  I  do. 

TESTIMONY  OF  ALAN  BOOTH,  ACCOMPANIED  BY  COUNSEL, 
MILTON  H.  FRIEDMAN 

Mr.  Arens.  Please  identify  yourself  by  name,  residence,  and  occu- 
pation. 

Mr.  Booth.  Alan  Booth,  1  West  126th  Street,  New  York  City; 
musician. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  appearing  today  in  response  to  a  subpena 
which  was  served  upon  you  by  the  House  Committee  on  Un-American 
Activities  ? 

Mr.  Booth.  I  am. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  represented  by  counsel  ? 

Mr.  Booth.  Yes ;  I  am. 

Mr.  Arens.  Counsel,  kindly  identify  yourself. 

Mr.  Friedman.  Milton  H.  Friedman,  342  Madison  Avenue,  New 
York. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  connected  with  the  Metropolitan  Music  School  ? 

Mr.  Booth.  I  am. 

Mr.  Arens.  In  what  capacity  ? 

Mr.  Booth.  Instructor  of  piano. 

Mr.  Arens.  Over  what  period  of  time  have  you  been  so  connected  ? 

Mr.  Booth.  I  would  say  since  1954  or  1955.  I  am  not  sure  of  the 
date. 

Mr.  Arens.  How  frequently  do  you  instruct  at  the  Metropolitan 
Music  School? 

Mr.  Booth.  Are  you  speaking  in  the  present  period  or  the  past? 

Mr.  Arens.  Let's  start  with  the  present.  How  frequently  do  you 
presently  instruct  ? 

Mr.  Booth.  Every  Saturday. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  has  been  your  past  experience  along  that  line? 

Mr.  Booth.  I  would  say  about  that — maybe  sometime  in  the  past 
I  might  have  had  2  days. 

Mr.  Arens.  Who  engaged  vou  to  teach  at  the  Metropolitan  Music 
School? 

Mr.  Booth.  I  was  called  by  the  director  of  the  school. 

Mr.  Arens.  Lilly  Popper? 

Mr.  Booth.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Arens.  Had  you  known  lier  in  advance  ? 

Mr.  Booth.  I  had  not. 


758       coMMUTsriSM  in  metropolitan  music  school,  inc. 

Mr.  Arens.  Where  else  have  you  taught? 

Mr.  Booth.  In  what  period? 

Mr.  Arens.  In  the  course  of  your  lifetime. 

Mr,  Booth.  I  have  taught  at  the  Mount  JNIorris  Music  School  in 
New  York  City.  It  is  now  nonexistent.  I  have  taught  in  the  Newark, 
N.  J.,  public  schools.  I  have  taught  also  at  the  Dillaixl  University,  in 
New  Orleans,  La. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  been  the  accompanist  to  Paul  Robeson? 

Mr.  Booth,  I  certainly  have. 

Mr.  Arens.  Over  what  period  of  time  were  you  Paul  Robeson's 
accompanist  ? 

Mr.  Booth.  I  would  say  from  May  1953  up  to  the  present. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  are  presently  Paul  Robeson's  accompanist? 

Mr,  Booth.  In  theory.  For  the  last  year  or  so  we  haven't  had  any 
concerts,  but  I  still  am  presently.     I  consider  myself  so. 

Mr.  Arens,  Have  you  ever  been  with  Paul  Robeson  in  any  closed 
meetings  of  any  kind,  in  which  only  a  select  group  were  admitted? 

Mr.  Booth.  Are  you  speaking  of  a  meeting  or  a  concert  or  what? 
What  do  you  mean  ? 

Mr.  Arens,  Have  you  ever  been  in  a  closed  Communist  Party  meet- 
ing with  Paul  Robeson? 

Mr.  Booth,  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  protection  afforded  me  by 
the  fifth  amendment, 

Mr,  Arens,  Are  you  at  the  present  time  a  Communist  ? 

Mr,  Booth,  I  decline  to  answer  under  the  protection  afforded  me 
by  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  taught  at  the  Jefferson  School  of  Social 
Science  ? 

Mr.  Booth.  I  decline  to  answer  under  the  protection  afforded  me 
by  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  given  concerts  under  the  auspices  of  the 
Jefferson  School  of  Social  Science? 

Mr.  Booth.  I  decline  to  answer  under  the  protection  afforded  me 
by  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  We  lay  before  you  now  the  Commmiist  Daily  Worker 
of  February  26,  1953,  in  which  your  name  appears  as  a  pianist. 

Mr.  Booth.  What  newspaper  is  that? 

Mr.  Arens,  The  Communist  Daily  Worker 

Mr.  Booth.  I  know  of  no  newspaper  by  that  name. 

Mr.  Arens.  Of  February  26,  1953,  Do  you  know  of  a  newspaper, 
the  Daily  Worker,  without  the  "Communist"  on  it? 

Mr.  Booth.  I  certainly  do. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  has  been  the  source  of  your  knowledge  about 
that  newspaper? 

Mr.  Booth.  It  is  on  the  newspaper  stands. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  that  the  only  place  you  have  seen  it? 

Mr.  Booth.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  it  is  the  Communist  pub- 
lication ? 

Mr.  Booth.  I  wouldn't  know. 

Mr.  Arens.  This  publication  which  I  have  in  my  hand — I  am  going 
to  display  it  to  you  in  just  a  moment — identifies  the  Negro  pianist, 
Alan  Booth,  as  a  performer  at  a  cultural  program  under  the  auspices 
of  the  Jefferson  School  [of  Social  Science]. 


COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.         759 

Kindly  look  at  that  and  see  if  you  can  help  this  Committee  on  Un- 
American  Activities  by  verifying  the  authenticity  of  the  factual  in- 
formation contained  in  that  article. 

(The  document  was  handed  to  the  witness.) 

Mr.  Booth.  Might  I  say  that  your  question  asked  me  about  being 
under  the  auspices  of  such-and-such  a  school.  I  declined  to  answer, 
so  what  is  the  point  of  this?  I  decline  to  answer  under  the  protec- 
tion afforded  me  by  the  fifth  amendment. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  decline  to  answer  tlie  question  that  is  out- 
standing? 

Mr.  Booth.  I  do. 

(Document  marked  "Booth  Exhibit  No.  1,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Apparently,  you  do  have  a  little  more  information 
about  the  Daily  Worker  than  you  first  told  us.  We  have  here  a  copy 
of  the  Daily  Worker  of  January  26,  1954,  in  which  there  was  a  cele- 
bration, the  30th  anniversary  of  the  Communist  Daily  Worker,  and 
they  launched  what  is  quoted  here  as  a  "big  birthday  party,"  Among 
those  who  were  there  celebrating  this  big  birthday  party  of  the  Daily 
Worker,  according  to  this  article,  was  Alan  Booth,  concert  pianist. 

Kindly  look  at  this  article  and  see  if  that  refreshes  your  recollection 
with  some  other  source  of  your  knowledge  of  the  publication  which 
I  have  alluded  to  as  the  Communist  Daily  Worker. 

(The  document  was  handed  to  the  witness.) 

Mr.  Booth.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  basis  of  the  protection 
afforded  me  by  the  fifth  amendment. 

(Document  marked  "Booth  Exhibit  No.  2,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files. ) 

(The  witness  conferred  witli  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Have  you  ever  been  abroad  ? 

Mr.  Booth.  No  ;  I  haven't.  What  do  you  mean  ?  Out  of  the  con- 
tinental United  States  ? 

Mr.  Arens.  Yes. 

Mr.  Booth.  I  have  been  to  Canada. 

Mr.  Arens.  Any  other  place  ? 

Mr.  Booth.  That  is  all. 

Mr.  Arens.  You  have  entertained,  of  course,  have  you  not,  under 
the  auspices  of  the  National  Council  of  tlie  Arts,  Sciences,  and  Pro- 
fessions ? 

Mr.  Booth.  I  don't  recollect.     I  might  have. 

Mr.  Arens.  Let  me  display  to  you  the  Sunday  Compass  of  October 
29,  1950,  in  which  your  name  appears  as  one  of  the  entertainers.  A 
series  of  concerts  under  the  auspices  of  the  New  York  Council  of  the 
Arts,  Sciences,  and  Professions  is  shown. 

See  if  that  refreshes  your  recollection. 

(The  docmnent  was  handed  to  the  witness.) 

Mr.  Booth.  That  refreshes  my  recollection. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  remember  that  occasion  ? 

Mr.  Booth.  Yes. 

(Document  marked  "Booth  Exhibit  No.  3,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files.) 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  you  know,  at  the  time  that  you  appeared  there,  that 
the  National  Council  of  the  Arts,  Sciences,  and  Professions  had  been 
found  to  be  a  Communist-controlled  enterprise  ? 


760  COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 

(The  witness  conferred  with  liiscounsel.) 

Mr.  Booth.  No  ;  I  did  not. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  is  the  United  Freedom  Fnnd  ?  Could  you  help 
us  on  that  ? 

Mr.  Booth.  I  don't  think  so.  I  think  you  might  know  more  about 
it  than  I  do. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  recall,  in  the  course  of  the  recent  past,  enter- 
taining, under  the  auspices  of  the  United  Freedom  Fund,  a  birthday 
celebration  and  concert  for  Paul  Robeson  ? 

Mr.  Booth.  I  recall  entertaining  for  a  birthday  celebration  of  Paul 
Robeson.     I  don't  recall  wliat  were  tlie  auspices.     Is  that  the  question  ? 

Mr.  Arexs.  Perhaps  this  will  help  you  to  refresh  your  recollection. 
We  lay  before  you  an  exhibit  featuring  that  celebration,  under  the 
auspices  of  the  United  Freedom  Fund,  and  the  date,  I  believe,  was  in 
May  1950. 

(The  document  was  handed  to  the  witness.) 

(The  witness  conferred  with  his  counsel.) 

Mr.  Booth.  It  doesn't  refresh  my  recollection. 

(Document  marked  "Booth  Exhibit  No.  4,"  and  retained  in  com- 
mittee files. ) 

Mr.  Arens.  I  respectfully  suggest,  Mr.  Chairman,  that  will  con- 
clude the  stall'  interrogation  of  this  witness. 

Mr.  DoTLE.  If  there  are  no  questions,  you  are  excused.     Thank  you. 

The  committee  will  stand  in  recess  until  10  o'clock  tomorrow 
morning. 

We  have  completed  hearing  all  the  witnesses  subpenaed  to  appear 
today,  so  we  are  not  inconveniencing  any  witnesses  or  any  attorneys. 

The  committee  will  reconvene  at  10  o'clock  tomorrow  morning  in 
this  room. 

(Whereupon,  at  2:50  p.  m.  Wednesday,  April  10,  1957,  the  sub- 
committee recessed,  to  reconvene  at  10  a.  m.  Thursday,  April  11,  1957. 
Present  at  time  of  recess:  Representatives  Clyde  Doyle,  James  B. 
Frazier,  Jr.,  Bernard  W.  Kearney,  and  Robert  J.  Mcintosh.) 


COMMUNISM    IN   METROPOLITAN   MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.      760(1) 


Arturo  Toiconlnl,  ,^V\/\  /I  U  1—1  I       I  l\    V  ''<"■<'  *»"•'■  C""'""" 


bVMPHONX 

OFTH^If^ 

THE  SYMPHONY   FOUNDATION  OF  AMERICA,   INC. 

CARNEOIE  HALL  •  H—  York.  N.  T  •  Ploto  TH90 

August    23,    1956 


tOAID   or   DllCCIOt} 


Mr.  William  "om 

UCl  Thlrtoentt:  Avenue 

Bolmar,  Now  Jersey 


Dear  Mr.  lorn: 


The  Board  of  Directors  of  the  Symphony  Foundation  of  America  has 
instructed  me  to  inform  you  thst  it  hes  amended  the  charges 
stfited  in  our  letter  of  Auguat  7,  195^  to  read: 

"Th*  specif ie  nat\ir«  of  the  charge  as  stated  Ln 
Section  5  "f  th*  By^lav's.  on  the  basis  of  vhich 
the  Eo^rd  h??  ^ote=d  tc  e?xel  .vo>i  fro!?  the 
3y3!chcnv  Fo^indstion  cf  A!!!er"ics.  is:  'for 
conduct  pre jusiieial  tc  the  best  Literasts  cf 
the  Fovaidatior. . ' " 

Ton  are  hereby  invited  tc  appear  before  the  Board  on  September  10. 
1956  at  11:00  a^m.,  instead  of  the  date  previously  given  you.  at 
the  Syaiphony  Foundation  office  to  show  cause  why  this  action 
should  not  be  carried  outc 


Sincerely . 


-^^y^    /fl£y(yt  a^yJ~~~ 


LF/cb 


760(2)       COMMUNISM    IN    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC. 


Arlure  To»conini, 
Conductor  [mmritut 


SyMPHON/ 

OFTH^IP^ 

THE  SYMPHONY  FOUNDATION   OF  AMERICA,   INC. 


lOAlO   or   OIIECTOHS 

David  Wolt«r.  CSo'rmon 
*lon  ihulmon,  Vin  Ckoi'mo 
l«on  Frsngiil,  S*cr*rorjr 
A>lhu>  G'snick.  l„oiui; 
^oul  Clamant 
Poul  Carihooit 
Joutio   IlKhkilt 
riiilip  Sklov 


CAKNKSIE   HALL 


N.w  Vofl,  N.Y. 


August  7»  1956 


Mr.  Sam  Borodkln 
Hotel  Wellington 
55th  St.  A  7th  Avenue. 
New  York,  N.Y, 

Dear  Mr.  Borodkln: 

Your  request  for  postponement  of  the  hearing  of  the 
charges  has  been  granted  by  the  Board.  The  date  of 
the  meeting  set  aside  for  this  hearing  will  be 
Wednesday,  August  22nd  at  10:30  A.M.  in  the  office 
of  the  Symphony  Foundation  of  America. 

The  specific  nature  of  the  charge,  as  stated  In 
Section  5  of  the  By-Laws,  Is: 

1,  "Failure  to  maintain  high  artistic  standards 

and  musicianship  hereby  required  for  the 
musician-members  of  the  Foundation." 

2.  "....conduct  prejudicial  to  the  best  Interests 

of  the  Foundation", 

It  Is  the  sincere  wish  of  the  Board  that  you  make 
every  effort  to  attend  this  meeting  so  that  this  matter 
may  be  resolved. 

Sincerely  yours, 

Leon  Prengut 

Secretary 

Symphony  Foundation  of  America 


LF:8jw 


COMMUNISM    EST    METROPOLITAN    MUSIC    SCHOOL,    INC.      760(3) 


Artvre  Toicanlni, 
Cendwcfer  Emcrifui 


SyMPHONy 

OFTHEA^IP^ 

THE  SYMPHONY  FOUNDATION  OF  AMERICA,   INC. 

CARNEOIE  HALL  •  N«w  York.  N.  Y. 


tOAio  or  Diiicion 

David  Wolt*f,  ChoirnMin 
^lon  Shvlnofl.  VJc«  Chairman 
l»on  Fr«ngu!,  Stftair 
A,.lhu>  C'onlik.  Tr.oiu,» 
Paul  CUMitl 
Foul  G«rthaian 
Jotcho  ■vthfcln 
ntlllp  Sklor 


M<no  1-itfO 


August  23,  1956 


Mr.  Sa»  Borodkln 

Hotel  Wellington 

Seventh  Avenue  and  55th  Street 

New  York  19,  N.  Y. 


Dear  Kr.  Borodkln: 


The  Board  of  Directors  of  1he  Symphony  Foundation  of  Aaierlca  has 
Instructed  me  to  Inform  you  that  It  hao  amended  the  charges 
stated  In  our  letter  of  August  7,  1956  to  read: 

"The  specific  nature  of  the  charge  as  stated  in 
Section  5  of  the  By-laws,  on  the  basis  of  which 
the  Board  has  voted  to  exj^el  you  from  the 
Symphony  Foundation  of  America,  is:  'for 
conduct  prejudicial  to  the  best  Interests  of 
the  Foundation.'" 

You  are  hereby  invited  to  appear  before  the  Board  on  September  10th 
at  11:00  a.m.,  Instead  of  the  date  previously  given  you,  to  show 
cause  why  this  action  should  not  be  carried  out.   The  hearing 
will  be  held  at  the  Symjihony  Foundation  office. 


Sincerely, 


I  eon  Frenf  ut   (/ 

Secr'»tary 

Symphony  Fcund'^ticn  of  AFierica 


LF/cb 


X 


BOSTON  PUBLIC  LIBRARY 


3  9999  05706  3164 


V4o 

t/// 


iiiiliiiil 


W' 


iilill