Skip to main content

Full text of "James Elroy Flecker; an appreciation with some biographical notes"

See other formats


THE  LIBRARY 

OF 

THE  UNIVERSITY 

OF  CALIFORNIA 

LOS  ANGELES 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 


BY  THE  SAME  AUTHOR 


STREETS  :  A  BOOK  OF  LONDON  VERSES 
THE  FORTUNE 
REPUTATIONS 
THE  BLACK  CURTAIN 
MARGOT'S  PROGRESS 
Etc.  Etc. 


Flecker,  in  his  Rooms  at  Cambridge. 


Frontispiece. 


JAMES    ELROY 
FLECKER 


AN  APPRECIATION 
WITH    SOME    BIOGRAPHICAL   NOTES 


BY 

DOUGLAS    GOLDRING 


LONDON 

CHAPMAN   &   HALL,    LTD. 

11,  HENRIETTA  STREET,  W.C.  2 
1922 


Printed  in  Great  Britain  at 

The  May/lower  Press,  Plymouth 

William  Brendon  &  Son,  Ltd. 


PREFACE 

THE  chapters  which  follow  have  been 
written  in  the  confident  belief  that 
the  subject  of  them  has  secured  a 
permanent  position  in  English  literary 
history,  that  his  poetry  will  be  read  and 
admired  centuries  after  those  who  were  his 
contemporaries  have  passed  away,  and  that 
in  the  years  to  come  generations  of  poetry- 
lovers  will  be  eager  to  know  what  kind  of 
man  he  was,  what  he  looked  like,  what  his 
circle  thought  of  him.  It  has  seemed  worth 
while,  therefore,  to  jot  down  the  impressions 
and  reminiscences  of  a  few  of  his  friends 
who  have  been  kind  enough  to  search  their 
memories  at  my  request,  and  to  add  to  this 
material  my   own.     My  excuse  for  under- 

v 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

taking  the  work  is  the  fact  that — first  as 
editor  and  contributor  and  then  as  pub- 
lisher and  author — Flecker  and  myself  were 
closely  associated  during  the  greater  part  of 
his  literary  life,  and  I  was  thus  fortunate 
in  hearing  more  of  his  literary  plans  and 
of  his  ideas  about  his  own  poems  than  most 
of  his  other  friends,  including  many  who 
knew  him  far  more  intimately  than  I 
did. 

This  small  volume  certainly  makes  no 
pretensions  to  be  described  as  a  "  Life  "  of 
Flecker ;  but  it  will,  I  trust,  be  found  to 
contain  a  certain  amount  of  information 
which  lovers  of  his  poetry  will  find  of  in- 
terest. 

As  a  complete  biography  of  the  poet  will 

doubtless  be  issued   in   due  course,  I  have 

refrained    deliberately  from    tapping  many 

important  sources  of  information.     I  have, 

however,  gratefully  to  acknowledge  the  help 

which  I  have  received  from  (among  others) 
vi 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

Mr.  Henry  Danielson,  Mr.  Frank  Savery, 
Mr.  Roger  Ingpen,  Mr.  Trelawney  Dayrell- 
Reed,  and  Mr.  John  Mavrogordato.  To 
Mr.  Danielson  I  am  expressly  indebted  for 
the  bibliographical  information  given  at  the 
end  of  the  book. 

DOUGLAS   GOLDRING. 

May  22nd,  1922. 


ILLUSTRATIONS 

Flecker,  in  his  Rooms  at  Cambridge         .         .         FrontiepUce 

Foxing  page 
"Two    Englishmen     (Flecker     and    J.    D.     Beazley) 

ENJOYING    THEMSELVES    IN    GERMANY  " FROM  A   DRAW- 
ING by  J.   D.  Beazley      ......       36 

James  Elroy  Flecker  (1909)  .....       66 

Corrections    to     "Oak     and    Olive/'     in     Flecker's 

Handwriting    ........     138 


A  PECULIAR  glamour  surrounds,  in 
retrospect,  the  fourteen  and  a  half 
years  which  separated  the  end  of 
the  'nineties  from  the  outbreak  of  the  Great 
War.  Looking  back,  in  1922,  those  of  us 
who  are  now  in  the  middle  'thirties  can  see 
ourselves  playing,  all  unmindful  of  our 
doom,  in  a  world  that  then  seemed  almost 
shadowless.  School  days,  undergraduate 
days,  early  manhood — life  seemed  to  grow 
better  and  better  as  the  years  slipped  away 
which  divided  us  from  the  great  catastrophe. 
1913  and  the  summer  of  1914  must  always 
have  that  historic  interest  which  the  human 
imagination  attaches  to  "  last  moments." 

But  if  we  like  to  dwell  on  this  queer  "  pre- 
war "  period,  to  think  about  it,  to  try  to  get 

3 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

it  in  perspective  and  disentangle  some  of 
the  main  threads  from  its  jumble  of  ten- 
dencies and  ideas,  and  to  keep  green  the 
memory  of  friends  who  died  before  the  Great 
Adventure  had  been  revealed  to  stricken 
humanity  as  the  Great  Illusion,  it  is  not 
because  we  wish  it  back  again  or  are  mere 
praisers  of  time  past.  Let  us  admit  that 
if  the  present  is  a  period  of  short  commons, 
bewilderment,  and  suffering,  there  is  no 
time  like  it — except  the  future.  We  have 
struggled  through  our  disasters  to  man's 
estate  ;  we  are  — compared  with  those  of 
our  contemporaries  whose  lives  ended  before 
the  war — grown-up.  We  have  gained  much 
in  the  process,  changed  our  sense  of  values, 
become  politically  "  responsible,"  realised, 
however  dimly  and  imperfectly,  the  human 
bonds  which  unite  us  with  our  fellow-men 
and  women  the  world  over. 

In  these  circumstances  it  is  only  natural 
that  our  ideas  of  Beauty  should  have 
4 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

changed  also.  The  artist  of  to-day— poet, 
painter,  novelist,  sculptor,  musician — is  dis- 
satisfied with  much  that  might  have  given 
him  pleasure  a  decade  ago.  He  seeks  more 
than  what  is  at  times  contemptuously 
termed  "  Beautiful  Beauty  "  ;  and  if  he 
is  taunted  with  accepting  ugliness  in  its 
place,  he  can  reply  that  what  he  seeks  is 
significance  — not  the  pretty  Chinese  lantern, 
but  the  naked  light  within.  So  it  is  that 
much  of  the  art  produced  between  1900-14 
has  become  almost  unbearable  with  the 
passage  of  years.  Reputations  have 
flourished  and  withered,  fashionable  figures 
have  had  their  day  and  night  has  covered 
them  :  even  the  war-poets  have  wilted.  If 
the  casualties  in  regard  to  reputation  are  un- 
expected, the  survivors  are  equally  so.  Very 
few  can  claim  to  have  foretold  on  the 
publication  of  "  The  Golden  Journey  to 
Samarkand  "  that  the  status  of  James  Elroy 

Flecker  would  be  as  high  as  it  is  to-day. 

5 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

If  it  was  the  visible  world  which  enthralled 
Flecker,  and  if  the  beauty  that  he  sought 
to  create  was  an  obvious,  almost  a  tangible 
beauty,  he  had  at  least  the  advantage  of  never 
being  fashionable,  and  he  had  that  quality  of 
queerly  detached  effort  which  differentiates 
the  "  pains  "  taken  by  genius  from  those 
which  are  taken  by  talent.  He  worked  at 
his  poems  for  his  poems'  sake ;  was  de- 
liberately ascetic  and  austere  in  regard  to 
his  art ;  deliberately  objective.  He  sup- 
pressed ephemeral  emotion,  just  as  he 
suppressed  the  ephemeral  "  message," 
fashionable  philosophy,  or  what-not.  And 
so,  with  everything  of  a  merely  momentary 
significance  expunged,  the  precious  metal 
of  his  verse  has  survived,  has  held  its  own 
and  will  continue  to  be  treasured  perhaps 
as  long  as  our  language  lasts. 

Having  said  this  much,  it  must  be  added 
that  James  Elroy  Flecker  was  at  the  same 
time  peculiarly  the  product  of  his  age.  He 
6 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

was  definitely,  entirely  "  pre-war."  He 
died  with  the  pre-war  public  schoolboy's 
idea  of  war  undamaged,  intact,  and  the 
dying  embers  of  his  life  were  waked  into 
their  final  flame  by  its  fierce  breath.  But 
if  his  work  is  (as  I  believe)  of  a  lasting 
worth,  then  like  some  masterpiece  of  Greek 
sculpture,  it  will  be  found  to  epitomise  its 
period  and  will  give  the  historian  of  the 
future  some  valuable  clues  as  to  the  nature 
and  character  of  the  age  in  which  he  lived. 

At  present  we  are  very  much  too  near 
the  decade  in  which  Flecker  grew  to  man- 
hood, wrote  and  died,  to  be  able  to  do 
more  than  speculate,  very  tentatively,  as 
to  what  may  subsequently  appear  to 
have  been  its  salient  features.  It  was 
a  strange  period.  It  saw  the  birth  of 
the  English  Review,  the  rise  to  fame  of 
John  Masefield  and  Walter  de  la  Mare,  of 
Mr.  Granville  Barker  and  Joseph  Conrad. 
George    Bernard    Shaw    and    H.    G.    Wells 

7 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

produced  in  it  a  good  deal  of  their  finest 
work  ;  it  witnessed  a  cult  of  the  open  air 
and  the  open  road  ;  of  nut  cutlets  and  no 
hats,  and — at  all  events,  at  Oxford — a  tre- 
mendous cult  of  the  eighteen-'nineties,  of 
Wilde,  of  Beardsley,  of  Verlaine,  Baudelaire, 
and  Ernest  Dowson.  Another  dominating 
influence  on  English  poetry  during  the  period 
was  A.  E.  Housman.  Theatrical  interest  was 
divided  between  the  imported  musical 
comedies  staged  so  superbly  by  the  late 
Mr.  George  Edwardes  (who  that  saw  it  will 
forget  his  production  of  Les  Merveilleuses, 
at  Daly's  ?) ;  and  the  activities  on  a  dif- 
ferent plane  of  Mr.  Shaw  and  Mr.  Granville 
Barker,  the  Stage  Society,  etc.  Of  the 
social  gaieties  of  the  period,  culminating 
in  the  Bacchanalian  crescendo  which  ended 
in  July,  1914,  it  is  scarcely  necessary  to 
speak.  A  generation  hence,  volumes  of 
memoirs  will  pour  from  the  press  making 
a  vain  attempt  to  describe  what  those  who 
8 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

never  witnessed  it  will  never  be  able  to 
believe.  Those  radiant  nights  of  dancing 
in  travesti,  those  unceasing  libations  of 
dry  monopole,  that  frenzied  pursuit  of  plea- 
sure careless  of  the  morrow,  have  passed 
away  as  even  the  most  brilliant  night 
must  yield  before  the  grey  and  menacing 
dawn. 

For  the  leisured  classes,  for  people,  that 
is  to  say,  with  incomes  of  about  £800  a  year 
and  over,  we  can  see  now  that  the  period 
was  one  of  peculiar  ease  and  comfort, 
eminently  conducive  to  the  pursuit  of  the 
most  diverse,  delightful,  and  completely 
useless  branches  of  scholarship.  Such  hoary 
institutions  as  the  public  school,  Oxford 
and  Cambridge,  the  "  English  gentleman," 
and  so  forth,  if  they  bore  in  them  the  seeds 
of  decay  or  the  indications  of  change,  had 
not  yet  either  decayed  visibly,  or  changed 
in  any  manner  that  attracted  notice.  For 
public  schoolboys  and  for  undergraduates  — 
b  9 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

and  James  Elroy  Flecker  was  essentially  of 
the  fine  fleur  of  our  public  school  and  Uni- 
versity system — it  was  a  time  of  unusual 
opportunity  for  intellectual  flower-gathering. 
It  provided  a  little  of  everything  and 
nothing  long.  Perhaps,  by  giving  adoles- 
cent boys  and  girls  so  many  lovely  things 
to  think  about,  it  helped  to  deprive  them  — 
in  matters  of  which,  after  crossing  an  ocean 
of  blood  and  tears,  we  can  to-day  so  depres- 
singly  see  the  importance — of  all  capacity 
for  thought.  The  world  was  so  full  of  a  num- 
ber of  things — who  can  blame  them  if  they 
were  happy  ? 

And,  indeed,  for  the  young  things  of  the 
privileged  classes,  it  was  a  happy  time. 
In  the  world  of  art  and  letters  the  absinthe- 
sodden  gloom  of  the  'nineties  had  dis- 
appeared, with  much  of  the  Victorian 
puritanism  which  had  provoked  it.  The 
sun  was  shining  again,  the  lark,  etc.,  were 
functioning  to  perfection.  Who  can  blame 
10 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

those  young  men  and  women  for  not  troubling 
to  investigate  problems  so  banausic  as  those 
of  foreign  politics  ?  They  had  the  world 
full  of  toys  to  play  with,  and  for  to 
admire  they  had  "  the  flowers  and 
men  and  mountains  that  decorate  it  so 
superbly." 

Looking  back,  it  is  delightful  to  remem- 
ber that  stern  moralists  of  the  Kipling  type 
found  much  to  distress  them  in  the  pre-war 
public  school.  Bullying  had  to  a  large 
extent  disappeared  from  the  unofficial  cur- 
riculum. The  "  treat-'em-rough  "  prefect, 
who  was  almost  a  subaltern  and  had  almost 
a  moustache,  was  beginning  to  make  way 
for  sixth-form  boys  with  a  real  interest  in 
the  classics  and  some  feeling  for  literature, 
who  were  almost  undergraduates.  It  ceased 
to  be  altogether  shameful  to  read  the 
English  poets  in  the  school  library  on  a 
Sunday  afternoon.  A  wave  of  what  our 
reactionaries    would    call    "  softness "    and 

11 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

outside  observers  might  have  described  as 
"  civilisation  "  broke  over  our  crusted  insti- 
tutions— those  institutions  in  which  normal 
intelligence  has  still  to  make  such  a  desperate 
struggle  for  existence.  The  change  in  the 
public  schools  was  reflected  at  Oxford. 
Instead  of  the  fierce  and  violent  reactions 
of  the  'nineties,  when  those  who  could  not 
bear  the  public  school  atmosphere  signalised 
their  escape  from  the  prison-house  by  rush- 
ing to  extremes  of  morbid  decadence,  there 
was  a  more  widely  diffused  cultivation  of 
the  arts  and  less  persecution  of  the  poseur, 
with  the  result  that  young  men  became 
on  the  whole  less  closely  wedded  to  their 
poses.  To  be  a  "  decadong "  was  really 
more  of  a  rag  than  anything  else,  and  I 
don't  suppose  that  any  of  the  youths  who 
in  slightly  intoxicated  moments  recited  the 
"  credo  of  a  despairing  decadent "  would 
have  gone  to  the  stake  for  it,  though  one 
or  two  were  induced  (to  their  disgust),  by 
12 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

a  gloomy  ass  who  controlled  one  of  the 
smaller  colleges,  to  take  the  train  to  Cam- 
bridge. 

The  'nineties  were  cultivated  with  rapture 
in  the  nineteen-hundreds,  and  the  extrava- 
gances and  eccentricities  of  the  earlier  period 
were  reproduced  with  painstaking  zeal ; 
but,  as  I  have  suggested,  the  point  of  view 
was  changed,  the  "  ennui  "  was  factitious. 
Of  plutocratic  Oxford  in  the  pre-war  period 
Mr.  Compton  Mackenzie,  in  the  second 
volume  of  "  Sinister  Street  "  has  proved  a 
faithful  recorder,  endowed  with  a  prodigious 
memory.  Of  conventional  Oxford — which 
then  as  now,  comprised  such  a  large  propor- 
tion of  the  undergraduates — no  recorder  is 
or  ever  will  be  necessary.  "  The  system  " 
took  their  money  and  at  the  end  of  three 
or  four  years  produced  them  like  rabbits 
from  a  conjuror's  hat  and  distributed  them 
among  curacies  and  assistant-masterships 
and  lawyers'  offices,  to  continue  the  work 

13 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

of  perpetuating  "  the  system."  The  pro- 
portion of  undergraduates,  however,  whose 
main  interest  was  in  literature,  art,  and 
scholarship — the  aesthetes,  in  short — deserve 
some  reminiscent  pages.  Poetry  or,  to  be 
exact,  shockingly  bad  verse,  was  written 
by  the  ream,  and  the  fashionable  thing  was 
to  be  "  wondrous,"  more  wondrous  than 
anyone  had  ever  been  before.  One  had 
also  to  be  sensitive  and  rather  frail,  to  culti- 
vate "  ennui,"  to  be  gnawed  by  secret 
despairs.  How  much  of  a  camouflage  was 
this  frail  and  lily-like  attitude  was  once 
agreeably  displayed  by  a  friend  of  Flecker's 
and  of  my  own  who,  on  being  debagged  at 
Merton,  horrified  the  aghast  rowing  men 
by  a  boxing  display  which  left  quite  a 
number  of  them  prostrate.  The  outraged 
poet  then  resumed  his  trousers  with  a  dignity 
which  struck  awe  into  all  beholders.  The 
despairs  were  the  greatest  possible  fun. 
Don't  imagine  from  the  following  lines  that 
14 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

the  author  of  them  was  not  enjoying  himself 
hugely. 

There  is  no  new  hope  to  be  hoped  for, 
There  is  no  new  word  to  be  said  ; 
All  ends  are  as  shadows  of  shadows, 
Pale  ghosts  of  things  dead. 

The  good  and  the  evil,  what  are  they  ? 
I  am  weary  of  ease  as  of  strife  : 
The  days  as  they  drag  are  made  heavy 
With  loathing  of  life. 

Before  composing  this  work  he  had,  I 
believe,  lunched  unwisely.  After  luncheon, 
in  a  mauve  silk  shirt,  he  had  punted  on  the 
Cherwell  and  sadly  and  regretfully  he  had 
been  seasick  into  it.  The  tragedies  of 
youth  ! 

Other  lines,  I  think  they  must  be  from  the 
same  delightful  source,  have  lingered  in  my 
memory.  I  hope  their  author  (if  he  sees 
this  book)  will  forgive  me  for  quoting 
them.  After  all,  the  prompting  motive  is 
as  much  sentiment  as  a  sense  of  humour  I 

15 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

Here,  then,  are  the  opening  stanzas  of  "  My 
Lilies  "  :  I 

In  my  soul's  garden,  'mid  a  tangled  bed, 
A  few  poor  lilies  grew. 
But  now,  alas  !   is  their  pale  glory  shed. 
They  were  but  few. 


Sadly  the  white  leaves  severed  one  by  one 
And  fell  upon  the  bed  : 
The  flowers  I  had  are  faded,  there  are  none 
That  are  not  dead. 


My  poor  flowers  !  the  garden  of  my  soul 
Is  empty  now  and  bare  ; 
I  have  no  lilies  left,  I  gave  them  all  : 
All  that  there  were. 

Besides  lilies,  we  were  nearly  all  of  us 
greatly  addicted  to  "  lassitude  "  ;  none 
more  so  than  the  friend  from  whose  works 
I  cull  these  gems.  Here  is  one  example 
of  it : 

Tired  September  :   and  the  rain  is  falling,  falling, 
With  a  sound  of  utter  lassitude,  outside  : 
Up  the  garden  I  can  see  the  gray  mists  crawling 
Over  rose-beds  where,  alas,  the  flowers  have  died. 

16 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

And  here  another  : 

Despair  is  on  us  in  these  autumn  days  : 

The  year  is  tired  of  flowers  ;   the  year  is  cold — 

I  am  tired,  too,  of  all  these  weary  ways, 

For  the  soul  in  me  is  very,  very  old. 

I  am  tired,  so  tired,  of  all  that  I  remember, 
So  tired  of  everything  that  I  forget. 
With  me,  as  with  the  year,  it  is  November — 
0  this  lassitude,  this  mist  of  vague  regret  ! 

Oh,  this  lassitude !  I  remember  how  a 
genuine  relic  of  the  'nineties  (grown  in  the 
course  of  years  into  a  very  sensible  parish 
priest)  once  parodied  our  silliness,  in  a 
happy  after-dinner  moment.  Unfortunately 
the  first  verse  is  the  only  one  which  I  can 
recall.    It  went  thus  : 

From  the  garden  of  sorrow 
Wan  blossoms  I  pick. 
My  mistresses  bore  me, 
My  meals  make  me  sick  ! 

What  Flecker's  bad  verses  were  like  I  do 
not  know,  as  I  did  not  make  his  acquaintance 
until  his  Oxford  days  were  over.     But  Mr. 

17 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

Frank  Savery  has  recorded  that  even  as  a 
schoolboy  he  already  wrote  verses  "  with 
appalling  facility."  "  He  imitated  with 
enthusiasm  and  without  discrimination,  and, 
the  taste  in  those  long-gone  days  being  for 
Oscar  Wilde's  early  verse  and  Swinburne's 
complacent  swing,  he  turned  out  a  good 
deal  of  decadent  stuff,  that  was,  I  am  con- 
vinced, not  much  better  than  the  rubbish 
written  by  the  rest  of  his  generation  at 
Oxford.  What  interested  me  in  Flecker  in 
those  days,"  Mr.  Savery  continues,  "  was 
the  strange  contrast  between  the  man — or 
rather,  the  boy — and  his  work.  Cultured 
Oxford  in  general,  I  should  add,  was  not 
very  productive  at  that  time  :  a  sonnet  a 
month  was  about  the  maximum  output  of 
the  lights  of  Balliol.  The  general  style  of 
literature  in  favour  at  the  time  did  not  lend 
itself  to  a  generous  outpouring.  Hence 
there  was  a  certain  piquancy  in  the  ex- 
uberant flow  of  passionate  verse  which 
18 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

issued  from  Flicker's  ever-ready  pen,  in 
spite  of  his  entire  innocence  of  any  experi- 
ence whatever. 

"  Furthermore,  he  was  a  wit — a  great  wit 
I  used  to  think,  but  no  humorist — and,  like 
most  wits,  he  was  combative.  He  talked 
best  when  someone  baited  him.  At  last 
it  got  to  be  quite  the  fashion  in  Oxford  to 
ask  Flecker  to  luncheon-  and  dinner-parties 
— simply  in  order  to  talk.  The  sport  he 
afforded  was  usually  excellent.  .  .  .  Look- 
ing back  on  it  now,  I  believe  I  was  right  in 
thinking  that  in  those  days  he  had  no 
humour  (there  is  very  little  humour  in 
Oxford) ;  nor  am  I  so  entirely  sure  that 
his  wit  was  bad.  I  had,  at  any  rate,  a 
growing  feeling  that,  in  spite  of  his  im- 
maturity and  occasional  bad  taste,  he  was 
the  most  important  of  any  of  us  :  his 
immense  productiveness  was,  I  vaguely  but 
rightly  felt,  better  and  more  valuable  than 
our  finicky  and  sterile  good  taste. 

19 


tl 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

By  1906  he  had  developed  greatly  — 
largely  thanks  to  the  companionship  of  an 
Oxford  friend  whom,  in  spite  of  long  absence 
and  occasional  estrangements,  he  loved 
deeply  till  the  end  of  his  life.  Even  his 
decadent  poems  had  improved  :  poor  as  are 
most  of  the  poems  in  4  The  Bridge  of  Fire,' 
they  are  almost  all  above  the  level  of 
Oxford  poetry,  and  there  are  occasional 
verses  which  forecast  some  of  his  mature 
work." 

If,  as  Mr.  Savery  tells  us,  Flecker  during 
his  Oxford  life  poured  out  an  almost  cease- 
less stream  of  bad  and  imitative  verse,  we 
can,  I  think,  regard  this  chiefly  as  the 
emotional  overflow  from  his  intellectual 
development.  I  have  dwelt  at  some  length 
on  the  sillier  aspects  of  pre-war  Oxford,  but 
it  would  be  giving  a  hopelessly  wrong  im- 
pression to  represent  such  asininities  as  being 
all  that  Oxford  meant,  to  those  who  indulged 

in  them.     All  Universities  are,   I   suppose, 
20 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

divided  into  two  camps,  the  first  consisting 
of  those  who  acquire  learning  for  a  definite 
ulterior  motive —money,  position,  and  so 
forth  ;  the  second,  those  who  read  for  their 
own  delight  and  intellectual  enrichment, 
those  who  have  the  true  scholar's  instinct, 
who  would  not  insult  any  branch  of  study 
by  taking  thought  as  to  its  utility  or  profit. 
Now,  in  the  pre-war  period  it  was  the  spirit 
of  this  second  camp  which  was  in  the  ascen- 
dant at  Oxford  and  was  to  a  most  notable 
degree  embodied  in  James  Flecker.  It  was 
a  time  when  men  read  the  literature  of 
Greece  and  Rome,  of  France  and  of  England, 
much  in  the  spirit  in  which  Keats  read 
Chapman's  Odyssey.  And  they  are  scarcely 
to  be  blamed  if  they  combined  with  some 
of  the  aesthetic  ardour  of  the  Renaissance 
not  a  little  of  its  joyous  obscenity  and 
hearty  appetite  for  life. 

Flecker's  obscenity  amounted  to  a  gift, 
and  many  of  his  most  famous  witticisms  and 

21 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

jeux  d? esprit  (written  down  and  illustrated 
in  a  MS.  volume  bound  in  "  art  linen," 
called  the  "  Yellow  Book  of  Japes,"  the 
joint  production  of  Flecker  and  of  his 
greatest  Oxford  friend)  are  scarcely  likely 
to  find  their  way  into  print.  One  may  be 
forgiven,  perhaps,  for  regretting  this,  for 
they  were  the  outcome  of  enormous  high 
spirits  and  of  a  wholly  charming  gusto  for 
life — a  rapturous  enjoyment  which  so  many 
of  us  can  experience  in  retrospect,  so  few, 
like  Flecker,  at  the  moment.  "  Ever  is 
Now,"  says  the  philosopher.  But  only 
those  whom  the  gods  love  know  his  meaning 
by  instinct  and  without  being  taught. 


22 


II 


II 


FLECKER  was  a  tall,  dark  man,  with 
a  swarthy  complexion,  blue  eyes, 
thick  black  eyebrows,  full  lips.  The 
most  noticeable  things  about  him  to  anyone 
who  met  him  for  the  first  time  were  his 
gentle,  rather  high-pitched  voice,  his  en- 
thusiasm, and  the  curious  mixture  of  ironic 
humour  and  sadness  of  which  his  habitual 
expression  was  compounded.  In  general 
appearance  he  was  decidedly  "  foreign-look- 
ing," and  a  strain  of  Jewish  blood  was 
apparent.  He  himself  was  always  aware 
that  he  did  not  look  entirely  English,  and 
as  he  had  a  passionate  love  for  the  country 
of  his  birth,  nothing  annoyed  him  more 
than  to  be  mistaken  for  anything  but  an 
Englishman.  On  one  occasion,  inquiring  of 
c  25 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

a  fellow-passenger  whether  a  'bus  went  in 
a  certain  direction,  the  individual  whom 
he  addressed,  mistaking  him  for  a  foreigner, 
insisted  on  pointing  out  several  landmarks, 
such  as  the  Law  Courts,  St.  Paul's  Cathe- 
dral, and  so  on.  Flecker's  disgust  can  be 
imagined.  When  the  vehicle  arrived  at  the 
Bank,  and  he  prepared  to  descend,  he 
growled  at  his  informant,  who  was  obvi- 
ously about  to  show  him  the  Royal  Ex- 
change, "  Damn  it  all,  I  may  have  seen  it 
before  !  " 

He  had  several  moustaches  during  his 
early  manhood,  and  shaved  them  off ;  but 
he  stuck  to  a  moustache  in  the  end,  and  it 
certainly  suited  him.  "  You  can  hear  it 
whistle  as  it  grows,"  he  once  pathetically 
remarked  about  his  beard,  while  he  was 
shaving. 

Flecker  was  born  in  Lewisham,  on  Novem- 
ber 5th,  1884.  He  was  christened  Herman 
Elroy  — James  was  a  name  which  he  adopted 
26 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

at  Oxford — and  was  the  eldest  of  the  four 
children  of  the  Rev.  William  Herman 
Flecker,  d.d.,  now  the  headmaster  of  Dean 
Close  School,  Cheltenham.  He  was  edu- 
cated at  his  father's  school  at  Uppingham, 
and  at  Trinity  College,  Oxford.  He  was 
at  Oxford  from  1902  to  1907.  During  his 
last  year  at  the  University  (or  just  after 
he  went  down)  he  paid  his  first  visit  to 
Italy  with  the  friend  to  whose  influence 
and  inspiration  he  owed  so  much.  This 
first  Italian  visit  was  a  turning-point  in 
his  career,  and  had  a  marked  reaction  upon 
his  poetry.  Soon  after  he  left  Oxford  (in 
1907)  he  became  for  a  time  a  master  at 
the  preparatory  branch  of  University  College 
School  at  Holly  Hill,  Hampstead,  of  which 
the  late  Mr.  Charles  Simmons  was  then 
principal.  Flecker  had  rooms  at  the  top 
of  Holly  Hill,  opposite  the  Mount  Vernon 
Hospital. 

He  was  certainly  an  original  and  probably 

27 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

an  extremely  able  teacher.  The  whole 
subject  of  education  was  one  of  his  deepest 
intellectual  interests  until  the  end  of  his  life, 
and  he  was  an  ardent  educational  reformer, 
as  his  dialogue  "  The  Grecians  "  indicates 
clearly  enough.  What  his  general  attitude 
was  towards  learning  and  towards  the  con- 
ventional education  of  his  time  may  be 
guessed  in  part  from  the  following  sentences, 
taken  from  the  preface  to  his  "  Scholar's 
Italian  Book  "  : 

"  Finally,  I  express  the  hope  that  some 
headmasters  may  find  in  this  book  a  useful 
recreation  for  a  sixth  form  exhausted  by 
successful  labours  in  scholarship-hunting ; 
and  that  many  scholars  may  be  induced  by 
me  to  spend  a  holiday  fortnight  studying  a 
language  which  all  those  who  know  love.  .  .  . 
No  attempt  has  been  made  in  the  ensuing 
pages  to  produce  a  work  of  commercial  or 
military    value.  .  .  .  My    sole    object    has 

been  to  enable  any  intelligent  student  who 
28 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

knows  some  Latin  and  French  to  learn  with 
the  minimum  of  labour  to  read  a  great 
literature." 

Although  Flecker  was  only  at  Holly  Hill 
for  one  term,  he  made  a  great  and  lasting 
impression  on  some  of  his  pupils.  Many 
of  his  translations  from  the  French,  which 
were  subsequently  printed,  after  revision, 
were  first  drafted  in  the  schoolroom,  and 
written  in  chalk  on  the  blackboard  after  the 
boys  had  produced  their  own  attempts,  as 
an  illustration  of  how  it  could  be  done. 
Leconte  de  Lisle's  "  Hjalmar  speaks  to  the 
Raven  "  was  translated  in  this  way.  Flecker 
threw  himself  with  characteristic  gusto  into 
the  school-life,  and  took  an  active  part  in 
the  school  games,  which  he  played  with 
immense  enthusiasm  and  no  skill.  He  was 
popular,  but  he  must  have  startled  everyone 
in  the  school,  from  the  boys  upwards.  He 
certainly  once  shocked  one  of  the  school- 
mistresses   by    informing    her    at    luncheon 

29 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

that  he  had  been  to  the  Oxford  Music  Hall 
the  night  before  ! 

When  he  left  Hampstead  he  went  for  a 
a  few  months  to  Mill  Hill,  but  he  found 
its  Nonconformist  atmosphere  antipathetic. 
After  leaving  Mill  Hill  he  gave  up  teaching 
altogether,  and  decided  to  go  in  for  the 
Consular  service,  the  training  for  which 
would  enable  him  to  spend  two  years  at 
Cambridge  in  the  study  of  Oriental  lan- 
guages. 

I  think  the  first  set  of  verses  which 
Flecker  ever  got  into  print  in  a  London 
paper  was  the  poem  called  "  Desire,"  which 
appeared  in  the  Idler  in  January,  1907.  It 
is  signed  "  H.  E.  Flecker,"  and  is  worth 
quoting,  because,  though  immature  and, 
indeed,  of  no  great  value,  it  is  nevertheless 
characteristic    and    bears    the    impress    of 

the  writer's  personality. 

Launch  the  galley,  sailors  bold  ! 
Pro  wed  with  silver,  sharp  and  cold, 
Winged  with  silk,  and  oared  with  gold. 
30 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

Silver  stream  in  violet  night ; 
Silken  clouds  in  soft  moonlight ; 
Golden  stars  in  shadowy  height. 

Stars  and  stream  are  under  cloud  ; 
Sinks  the  galley,  silver-prowed, 
Silken  sails  are  like  a  shroud. 


Flecker's  fondness  for  the  precious  metals 
is  traceable  through  all  his  work.  In  this 
short  poem  it  will  be  noticed  that  "  silver  " 
appears  three  times  and  "  golden  "  once. 

He  probably  had  several  little  poems  in 
the  Idler,  and  other  early  work  was  printed 
in  a  motor  journal  of  which  a  friend  of  his 
was  editor.  But  he  was  a  sufficiently  good 
self-critic,  even  at  this  period,  not  to  re- 
print all  these  ephemeral  pieces  in  "  The 
Bridge  of  Fire,"  which  Mr.  Elkin  Mathews 
published  for  him  in  the  Vigo  Cabinet  Series 
in  1907.  "  The  Bridge  of  Fire  "  was  origin- 
ally to  have  been  illustrated,  by  Mr.  Tre- 
lawney  Dayrell-Reed,  who  made  a  set  of 
Beardsleyesque  drawings,   in  one  of  which 

31 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

the  poet  was  caricatured,  in  much  the 
same  way  that  Beardsley  caricatured  Wilde 
in  one  of  the  "  Salome "  illustrations.  I 
do  not  know  why  the  project  was  abandoned. 
Expense,  most  likely. 

The  friend  to  whom  I  am  indebted  for 
information  about  Flecker's  schoolmastering 
experiences  at  Holly  Hill  has  given  me  the 
following  notes  about  Flecker's  London  life 
at  this  period. 

"  He  had  a  great  liking  for  Hampton 
Court,  and  was  never  weary  of  wandering 
through  the  picture  gallery  or  around  the 
beautiful  gardens.  He  was  one  of  the  very 
few  Englishmen  I  have  ever  met  who  went 
often  to  the  British  Museum,  Tate  and 
National  Galleries.  When  he  was  in  London 
he  would  frequently  arrange  to  meet  people 
opposite  such-and-such  a  picture  in  the 
National  Gallery,  regardless  of  the  fact  that 
it  generally  took  his  friend  ten  minutes  to 
find  out  where  it  was  situated.  He  was  fond 
32 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

of  going  to  the  Cafe  Royal — he  called  it  the 
only  really  Parisian  cafe  in  London — and 
when  there  he  used  to  draw  (very  badly) 
monkeys  on  the  table.  He  was  fond  also 
of  the  Vienna  Cafe  in  Holborn,  where  he 
liked  studying  the  types.  .  .  .  Flecker  pos- 
sessed a  cynical  sort  of  wit,  and  was  occa- 
sionally a  practical  joker." 

In  October,  1908,  Flecker  went  to  Cam- 
bridge, and  entered  at  Caius  College — not 
altogether  a  happy  choice.  His  rooms  were 
in  Jesus  Lane,  near  the  Sidney  Street  end. 
One  of  his  intimate  friends  at  this  period 
has  sent  me  the  following  account  of 
Flecker's  life  at  Cambridge  : 

'  My  most  vivid  recollections  are  largely 
jokes,  limericks,  rhymes,  and  fantastic  social 
schemes  which  were  never  meant  to  pass 
beyond  word  of  mouth,  and  which  I  have 
no  intention  of  helping  into  print,  delightful 
as  they  were  :  he  had  a  genius  for  such 
things.     There  are  a  few  I  might  mention. 

33 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

Government  under  an  obligation  (the  revolt 
was  then  already  near  collapse).  His  com- 
panion was  J.  J.  Knox,  who  afterwards 
went  (I  think)  to  Teheran.  But  very  likely 
you  have  had  this  story  already  from  some- 
one else. 

"Flecker  told  it  very  vividly — they  were 
sitting  in  a  cafe  when  a  mob  rushed  up, 
crying,  c  A  la  lanterne  !  '  No  one  could 
believe  they  were  both  English,  because  of 
the  excellence  of  Knox's  accent.  '  On 
peut  passer  vingt  ans  a  Paris — on  ne  perd 
jamais  l'accent  anglais.' 

"  Flecker  was  much  amused  at  what  he 
regarded  as  a  certain  childishness  and 
affected  naivete  in  Cambridge  men,  particu- 
larly King's  men.  He  typified  this  by  an 
imaginary  King's  man's  dream  :  4  Do  you 
know  I  had  such  a  wonderful  dream  last 
night.  I  dreamt  that  I  was  walking  in  a 
beautiful  garden,  all  by  myself !  ' 

"  He  always  had  a  great  desire  to  herd 
36 


Two  Englishmen  (Fleckeb  and  J.  D.   Beazley)  enjoying 

THEMSELVES    IN    GERMANY." 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

his  friends  round  him,  to  establish  a  sort 
of  society  of  them  — calling  them  all c  Brother 

,'  and  so  on.     I  think  the  people  who 

impressed  him  most  at  Cambridge  were 
A.  W.  Verrall  and  Prof.  E.  G.  Browne  :  none 
of  his  contemporaries  at  Cambridge  had  an 
influence  on  him  in  any  way  comparable 
to  that  of  J.  D.  Beazley  at  Oxford. 

"  He  was  very  enthusiastic  about 
Apuleius,  and  once  started  an  admirable 
translation  of  the  Golden  Ass.  He  read  me 
part  of  the  Xlth  Book,  but  he  never  finished 
it :  I'm  afraid  my  criticism  of  detailed 
points  discouraged  him,  which  was  the  last 
thing  I  meant. 

1  Of  particular  visual  recollections  of  him, 
one  of  the  vividest  is  on  a  river  picnic  above 
Byron's  Pool,  when  we  all  bathed,  and 
Flecker  marched  about  up  to  his  waist  in 
the  river,  holding  a  canoe  upside  down  over 
his  head,  entirely  hiding  it.  He  was  an 
expert  both  at  punting  and  canoeing,  and 

37 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

had  a  justifiable  contempt  for  Cambridge 
standards  in  these  arts. 

"  He  translated  Arabic  stories  delight- 
fully :  I  recollect  very  clearly  hearing  him 
read  the  story  on  which  he  based  the  Ballad 
of  Iskander.  His  version  was  entrancing, 
and  I  thought  he  spoiled  it  in  the  poem  by 
the  metaphysical  colouring  he  there  gave  it. 

"  I  remember  how  furious  he  was  at 
being  called,  in  some  review  of  c  The  Last 
Generation,'  a  grim  disciple  of  H.  G.  Wells 
at  his  grimmest.  .  .  .  He  was  at  Caius, 
but  I  don't  think  he  had  many  friends  there 
or  took  much  part  in  the  life  of  the  College. 
His  friends  were  chiefly,  I  think,  King's 
and  Trinity  men.  ..." 

That  Caius  was  not  altogether  a  happy 
choice  for  a  man  of  Flecker's  temperament 
is  confirmed  by  another  Cambridge  con- 
temporary, from  whose  letter  (to  a  third 
party)  I  am  permitted  to  quote  some  pass- 
ages :  "I  remember,  of  course,  that  lunch 
38 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

in  Rupert's  (Rupert  Brooke's)  rooms  in 
May,  1908,  when  you  and  Flecker  also  were 
there.  .  .  .  Flecker,  I  remember,  was  not 
very  happy  here.  The  men  of  Caius  were 
not  sympathetic  to  him.  Almost  any  other 
college  would  have  been  more  congenial, 
and  either  King's  or  Trinity  obviously  the 
best.  The  Caius  people  tried  to  be  kind  to 
him,  but  I  don't  think  he  found  much 
enjoyment  in  breakfast  at  8  a.m.  with 
Rugby  blues  and  students  of  law  and  medi- 
cine. He  saw  a  good  deal  of  Rupert  and 
of  other  members  of  the  Carbonari  circle  in 
King's.  Arthur  Schloss,  now  Waley,  was, 
I  think,  his  greatest  friend  in  King's.  They 
were  both  lovers  of  the  East.  I  think  he 
joined  the  Fabian  Society  of  those  days,  as 
nearly  everyone  did  who  was  in  or  on  the 
fringes  of  these  King's  circles.  But  he 
wasn't  much  interested  in  politics.  He 
was  inclined  to  dislike  the  poor  and  to  be 
bored  with  them  and  to  regard  the  large 

39 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

projects   of  our   young   hopes   as   waste   of 
time." 

At  Oxford  Flecker  had  been  the  (then) 
conventional  high  Tory  in  politics.  He  liked 
the  idea  of  Emperors  and  Kings,  and  of 
magnificent  courts,  because  he  associated 
them  with  a  lavish  patronage  of  the  arts. 
His  view  was  that  the  best  art  was  produced 
under  an  autocracy,  e.g.  Velasquez  and  the 
Russian  Ballet  under  the  late  Czar — and 
that  nothing  else  much  mattered.  The 
plebs,  he  felt,  in  their  own  best  interests, 
should  be  governed  firmly,  from  above.  By 
the  time  he  reached  Cambridge,  however, 
his  ideas  on  political  matters  were  rather 
more  "  serious."  Cambridge  made  him  a 
Liberal,  even  an  enthusiastic  Liberal.  At  one 
time  he  seems  to  have  played  with  the 
project  of  throwing  up  his  career  in  the 
Consular  service  and  standing  for  Parlia- 
ment. For  several  reasons,  I  venture  to 
disagree  with  the  statement  of  the  Cam- 
40 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

bridge  contemporary  whose  letter  I  have 
just  quoted,  that  Flecker  wasn't  much 
interested  in  politics.  No  doubt  the  minutiae 
of  party  politics  bored  him,  and  the  arid 
intellectual  wrangles  of  the  Fabians.  But 
he  was  certainly  interested  in  the  general 
progress  of  political  thought,  in  revolutions, 
in  the  politics  of  the  human  race.  He  had 
an  ardent  sympathy  with  the  political  ideal- 
ism of  Shelley  and  of  Keats,  and  deplored  — 
from  his  standpoint  as  poet— the  apparent 
absence  of  any  movement  capable  at  once 
of  absorbing  and  inspiring  him.  In  a  review 
of  the  sixth  volume  of  Professor  W.  J. 
Courthope's  "  History  of  English  Poetry  " 
he  writes  :  "  Yet  we  often  agree  with  Mr. 
Courthope  when  he  is  not  employed  in 
criticism,  and  especially  when  he  deplores 
the  absence  of  political  interest  in  modern 
poetry.  He  is  rather  apt  to  blame  the 
poets  :  he  should  blame  history.  The  dearth 
of  proud  and  eagle-winged  forces  in  this 
d  41 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

modern  age  is  a  calamity  for  art.  Whether 
these  century-old  poets  preached  an  idea 
as  Shelley,  Byron,  and  Wordsworth,  ran 
counter  to  it,  as  Crabbe,  or  neglected  it,  as 
Keats,  they  had  the  inestimable  advantage 
of  living  in  a  society  rent  by  the  enthusiasm 
and  hatreds  of  the  French  Revolution.  In 
those  good  days  Shelley  was  not  an  in- 
effectual angel  whose  pretty  lyrics  might 
be  read  by  simpering  girls,  but  a  most 
effectual  Devil,  like  a  socialist  of  to-day, 
attacking  the  very  foundations  of  society. 
Only  during  the  last  year  has  there  arisen 
in  England  a  political  crisis  worthy  of  the 
pen,  and  in  this  revived  bitterness  of  strife 
lies  at  least  some  hope  for  the  future  of 
English  Poetry." 

In  regard  to  his  life  at  Cambridge,  although 
his  attempt  to  recover  the  old  rapture  of 
University  life  may  not  have  been  entirely 
successful  (any  more  than  an  amorous 
rechauffage  can  be  entirely  successful),  he 
42 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

certainly  did  not  regret  the  years  he  spent 
there.  He  played  strenuous  tennis  ;  punted 
a  good  deal ;  wore  his  beloved  blazers  when- 
ever he  got  a  chance  ;  at  times  sported  a 
corduroy  coat ;  talked  ;  made  many  friends  ; 
contributed  to  various  Cambridge  papers 
such  as  The  Cambridge  Review  and  The 
Gownsman,  and — more  important  to  him 
than  anything  else — made  progress  in  the 
art  to  which  his  life  was  devoted.  To  me  he 
often  referred  with  great  satisfaction  to  the 
fact  that  he  had  had  "  the  peculiarly  delight- 
ful experience  "  of  life  at  both  Universities. 

After  leaving  Cambridge,  Flecker  was 
sent  to  Constantinople  in  June,  1910  ;  was 
taken  ill  there  in  August  of  the  same  year, 
returned  to  England  in  September  and 
went  to  a  sanatorium  in  the  Cots  wolds.  In 
March,  1911,  he  returned  to  his  post,  ap- 
parently quite  recovered,  and  was  trans- 
ferred to  Smyrna  in  April.  In  May,  1911, 
he    went    on    leave    to    Athens,    where    he 

43 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

married  a  Greek  lady,  Miss  Helle  Skiadaressi, 
whom  he  had  met  the  year  before.  He  spent 
three  months'  holiday  mostly  in  Corfu  (where 
the  poem  called  "Phseacia"  was  written), 
and  was  sent  to  Beirut,  Syria,  in  Septem- 
ber, 1911.  Flecker  did  not  really  like  the 
East,  or  the  Easterns,  when  he  got  to  know 
them  well,  although  he  had  an  instinctive 
understanding  of  them.  His  first  impres- 
sions of  Constantinople  were,  however,  happy 
enough.  Writing  to  a  friend  about  it,  he 
says  :  "  It  is  very  beautiful,  and,  as  I  tell 
everybody,  not  a  bit  like  our  Earl's  Court 
Exhibition,  as  I  feared  it  might  be.  I  am 
going  to  stay  here  for  two  months  more,  at 
least,  so  I  hope  I  shall  enjoy  myself  :  indeed, 
I  do.  I  ride  a  horse  and  take  photographs 
and  swim  in  the  Bosphorus  and  play  tennis 
and  talk  to  Turks  in  the  loveliest  country  in 
the  world.  But  I  am  lonely  at  times.  ..." 
He  undoubtedly  missed  his  wide  circle  of 
friends  in  London  and  at  the  Universities. 
44 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

At  Beirut  he  seems  to  have  been  particularly 
homesick,  and  he  admitted  afterwards  that 
he  spent  most  of  his  time  there  dreaming  of 
Oxford.  But  it  was  not  so  bad  to  start 
with.  "  Not  a  bad  life  here,"  he  says  in 
one  of  his  letters,  "  riding,  bathing  (bathed 
Nov.  22,  sea  quite  warm),  decent  rooms, 
piano  .  .  .  people  mostly  fools." 

In  December,  1912,  he  came  back  on  leave 
for  a  few  weeks  to  England,  and  visited 
Paris,  returning  to  Beirut  in  January,  1913. 
In  March,  1913,  he  was  again  taken  ill,  and 
after  a  few  weeks  on  the  Lebanon  (Brumana) 
he  went  to  Switzerland,  where  he  remained 
for  the  last  eighteen  months  of  his  life.  He 
went  first  to  Leysin,  but  moved  on  to 
Montreux,  then  to  Montana,  to  Locarno, 
and  finally,  in  May,  1914,  to  Davos.  He 
died  at  Davos  on  January  3rd,  1915,  and 
was  buried  at  Cheltenham  at  the  foot  of 
the  Cots  wold  Hills. 


45 


Ill 


Ill 


MY  personal  memories  of  James 
Flecker  start  from  an  evening  in 
the  summer  of  1907,  when,  in 
response  to  an  invitation,  I  called  upon  him 
after  dinner  at  his  lodgings  in  a  Bloomsbury 
Square.  The  details  of  that  evening  call 
remain  clear  and  vivid  in  my  mind,  but 
where  we  first  encountered  one  another  and 
how  many  times  we  had  previously  met  I 
cannot  remember.  It  was,  no  doubt,  Tre- 
lawney  Dayrell-Reed,  a  friend  whom  we 
had  in  common,  who  introduced  us  ;  and 
I  have  a  vague  recollection  of  a  crowded 
tea-party  in  a  flat  in  Chelsea  (given  by  the 
mother  of  the  lady  who  later  on  was  so 
often  to  be  our  hostess)  at  which  Flecker 
must  have  been  present.     But,  in  any  case, 

49 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

we  could  only  have  known  one  another  very 
slightly  on  the  evening  when  I  walked  over 
from  my  Bloomsbury  lodgings  to  his.  I 
remember  very  well  telling  myself,  as  I 
crossed  Russell  Square,  not  to  be  impressed 
by  the  Flecker  "  legend."  Already,  after 
a  few  months  of  journalism  in  London,  I  had 
begun  to  be  rather  contemptuous  both  of 
Oxford  wit  and  Oxford  reputations. 

Flecker  was  the  great  man  among  my 
circle  of  friends  in  those  days,  and  his  name 
—and  jokes— were  upon  everybody's  lips. 
I  had  got  rather  sick  of  hearing  it. 

The  house  in  which  he  was  staying  was 
the  usual  slightly  dingy  Bloomsbury  board- 
ing-house, differing  hardly  at  all  from  the 
one  which  I  was  temporarily  inhabiting 
myself.  I  well  remember  its  gloomy  hall, 
lit  by  a  meagre  speck  of  gas,  the  landlady's 
folded  arms  and  suspicious  eye,  the  dark 
stairs  leading  up  to  the  "  second-floor  back," 
and  the  bright  line  of  light  gleaming  under 
50 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

Flecker's  door.  When  I  opened  the  door,  I 
found  the  poet  striding  about  under  the 
baleful  glare  of  unshaded  incandescent  gas, 
amid  an  indescribable  confusion  of  books 
and  pictures  and  belongings.  He  was  "  pack- 
ing up,"  he  said,  in  preparation  for  a  journey- 
to  France  with  a  friend  of  his  called  Knox. 
They  were  going  to  investigate  the  rising 
among  the  vignerons  of  the  Bordeaux  dis- 
trict, where  Catholicism  was  in  conflict  with 
the  Republic — a  romantic  adventure,  with 
revolvers  in  it !  Flecker  had  bought  his, 
and  its  barrel  glittered  in  the  gaslight  as  he 
showed  it  to  me. 

If  he  really  was  "  packing  up,"  there  was 
certainly  nothing  to  indicate  that  the  enter- 
prise had  got  very  far.  The  tables  and  all 
the  chairs  were  piled  with  books — beauti- 
fully bound  classical  texts,  French  and 
Italian  novels  in  paper  covers,  copies  of 
"  L'Assiette  au  Beurre  "  and  of  "  Jugend," 
dictionaries,    volumes    of    the    poets — and, 

51 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

half-buried  among  the  piles,  were  such  things 
as  a  typewriter,  a  bottle  of  Maraschino  and 
another  of  Chianti,  tumblers,  pictures,  manu- 
scripts. Pictures  were  piled  up  against  the 
skirting-boards,  or  lay  on  their  faces  on  the 
floor  in  imminent  danger  of  being  crushed 
under  their  owner's  feet  as  he  paced  up  and 
down  the  room. 

My  disinclination  to  be  impressed  vanished 
in  a  very  few  minutes.  I  was  immensely 
impressed.  Flecker  was  precisely  what  I 
thought  a  poet  ought  to  be.  We  were  most 
of  us  sentimental  francophiles  in  those  far-off 
days,  and  I  was  full  of  yearnings  and  illu- 
sions about  the  Latin  Quarter  and  Mont- 
martre  and  the  Moulin  de  la  Galette  and  the 
Bal  Bullier  and  the  Bal  des  Quatz'  Arts,  and 
so  on— knowing  nothing  at  all  about  them 
at  first-hand.  But  Flecker  had  already 
tasted  and  explored  these  long-dreamed-of 
delights,   and  his  accounts  of  his  visits  to 

Paris    thrilled    me    with    excitement.      He 
52 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

talked  of  Paul  Marinier  and  Lucien  Boyer, 
of  Steinlen  and  Aristide  Bruant,  of  the 
"  Chat  Noir  "  (ye  gods  !)  and  of  the  Noctam- 
bules,  of  the  Cafe  d'Harcourt  and  the 
BouT  Mich',  of  poets  and  painters  and  their 
mistresses.  He  was  an  admirable  talker, 
even  before  an  audience  of  one  speechless 
and  ecstatic  acquaintance,  and  he  had  a 
pleasant  knack  of  giving  a  vivid  and  amusing 
description  of  incidents  and  events  in  which 
he  had  played  a  part.  He  had  a  gentle, 
high-pitched,  enthusiastic  voice,  singularly 
attractive  to  listen  to.  He  turned  life 
always  and  all  the  time  into  a  tremendous 
adventure.  Like  most  creative  artists,  he 
was  egoistic,  and  used  to  talk  in  a  strain 
which  would  have  seemed  like  megalomania 
if  it  had  not  been  lightened  by  wit.  On  this 
occasion  he  read  me  two  "  magnificent ' 
poems  which  he  had  recently  finished  — 
"Ideal"  and  "The  Town  without  a 
Market."     I   shall   never   forget   the   gusto 

53 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

with  which  he  read  the  line  (from  "  Ideal "), 
"  Friend,  we  will  go  to  hell  with  thee." 
"  Hell,"  I  remember  thinking  slyly,  was 
just  the  sort  of  big,  vague,  decisive  spot  to 
which  anyone  of  Flecker's  enthusiastic 
nature  would  think  of  accompanying  a 
friend.  But  his  enthusiasm,  if  it  carried 
him  at  times  off  his  feet,  carried  him  also  — 
throughout  his  life  and  throughout  his  work 
— away  from  all  meanness. 

Said  I  :   "  The  world  was  made  for  kings  : 
To  him  who  works  and  working  sings 
Come  joy  and  majesty  and  power 
And  steadfast  love  with  royal  wings." 

The  poet  and  the  painter  were  to  him  the 
real  "kings"  of  this  world — this  world 
given  them  to  enjoy  to  the  utmost  as  a 
reward  for  their  work. 

The  first  two  chapters  of  one  of  the  many 
versions  of  Flecker's  novel,  "  The  King  of 
Alsander,"  fell  off  the  table  during  the 
evening,  and  at  my  request  he  read  them  to 
me.  I  was  sufficiently  under  the  spell  of  his 
54 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

personality  to  think  them  marvellous.  (Alas, 
when  nearly  seven  years  later  the  completed 
manuscript  came  to  me  in  my  capacity  as 
adviser  to  Flecker's  publishers,  it  was  a 
bitter  disappointment  to  find  how  time  had 
robbed  the  poor  old  "  King  "  of  nearly  all 
his  glamour  !) 

When  the  chapters  of  the  "  King  of  Al- 
sander  '  had  been  read  and  discussed,  our 
talk  reverted  to  poetry  and  to  Flecker's 
own  poems.  His  arrangements  regarding 
"  The  Bridge  of  Fire  "  had  just  been  con- 
cluded with  Mr.  Elkin  Mathews,  and  he 
was  looking  forward  with  tremendous  ex- 
citement to  its  appearance.  He  read  me 
a  few  more  of  the  poems  which  the  book 
was  to  contain,  including  "  Riouperoux  "  — 
a  poem  for  which  I  have  retained  a  particular 
affection  ever  since. 

As  I  walked  home  that  night,  filled  with 
excitement  and  warmed,  no  doubt,  with 
Chianti  and  Maraschino,   I  felt  that  to  be 

55 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

a  poet  was  the  most  wonderful,  the  most 
romantic  adventure  in  a  world  full  of  the 
maddest    and    most    delicious    possibilities. 
I   had   never   before   encountered   anybody 
with  anything  like  Flecker's  rapturous  joy 
of  living.     Most  of  us,   at  that  time,   cul- 
tivated a  mask  of  artificial  gloom  ("  There 
is  no  new  hope  to  be  hoped  for,  there  is  no 
new  word  to  be  said  !  ")  which  ineffectively 
concealed  our  high  spirits.    Flecker,  I  think, 
to  some  extent  reversed  this  process.     His 
eyes  were  always  sad  eyes,  and  there  was 
a  certain  sadness  latent  in  his  smile  which 
added   much   to   its   charm.      It   has   been 
asserted,  particularly  by  critics  who  never 
knew   him,    that   the   occasional   undernote 
of  melancholy  in  some   of  his  poems   was 
purely  factitious.     This,  to  my  mind,  is  a 
very   superficial  view,    based   not   only   on 
ignorance   of  Flecker  but   on  ignorance   of 
the  human  heart  as  well.     To  me  it  seems 
impossible  not  to  connect  Flecker's  extra- 
56 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

ordinary  joie  de  vivre,  his  capacity  for 
living  each  moment  to  the  full  and  the  rap- 
ture with  which  he  looked  upon  the  visible 
world,  with  a  belief  that  he  had  an  early 
premonition  that  his  allotted  span  was  too 
short  to  allow  him  a  moment  to  waste. 
When  he  described  himself  as  "  the  lean 
and  swarthy  poet  of  despair,"  it  was  prob- 
ably a  joke,  but  like  all  jokes  worth  making 
there  was  a  substratum  of  truth  in  it. 
Throughout  his  work  is  to  be  traced  that 
natural  horror  at  the  idea  of  death  which 
a  man  of  his  temperament  may  well  be 
excused  for  admitting.  It  would  be  absurd 
to  dismiss  such  a  poem  as  "  No  Coward's 
Song,"  or  the  poem  called  "  Prayer  "  (which 
was  written,  I  believe,  as  early  as  1907), 
as  being  insincere  or  artificial.  Indeed,  the 
opposite  is  probably  the  truth — that  they 
come  straight  from  the  poet's  heart  and  are 
among  the  most  intimate  and  subjective 
utterances  which  he  ever  entrusted  to  print. 
e  57 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

After  the  evening  I  have  described,  Flecker 
and  I  met  very  frequently  in  a  queer  flat  in 
Brixton,  the  home  of  a  lady  of  many  accom- 
plishments, not  the  least  of  which  was  a 
capacity  for  appreciating  young  poets  and 
their  verses.  The  atmosphere  of  the  flat 
was  ultra-Parisian.  French  novels  (not  al- 
ways of  a  very  prudish  kind)  and  volumes 
of  French  verse  lay  about  everywhere,  and 
the  walls  of  the  sitting-room  were  decorated 
with  Steinlens,  principally  Steinlen  cats. 
Here  we  used  to  gather  and  read  one  an- 
other's verses  and  sing  the  songs  from  Paris 
cabarets  of  which  Flecker  and  our  hostess 
between  them  seemed  to  have  an  almost 
inexhaustible  repertoire.  Paul  Marinier's 
long-forgotten  "  Ninon "  was  a  great 
favourite.  I  fancy  the  chorus  went  like 
this  : 

Allons,  Ninon  !    Ninon,  ne  dis  pas  non  ! 
L'Amour  est  bon,  c'est  un  peche  mignon. 
Pour  y  goutter  descends  vite  en  cachette, 
Ninon,  Ninette  ! 

58 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

Flecker  was  very  fond  of  "  Navaho  "  and 
"  La  Branche  de  Lilas,"  and  I  can  see 
him  now,  sitting  at  the  piano,  dressed  in 
a  scanty  Japanese  kimono,  smiling  his 
pleasant,  sardonic  smile,  and  picking  out 
the  tunes,  while  the  rest  of  us  shouted  the 
choruses. 

Both  Flecker  and  his  friend,  J.  D.  Beazley, 
had  a  habit  of  writing  out  their  poems  very 
neatly  in  tiny  little  manuscript  books  and 
presenting  them  to  the  lady  of  the  flat. 
Several  such  volumes  were  in  circulation 
among  our  group  and  are  still,  I  hope,  in 
existence,  though  it  is  hardly  likely  that  in 
Flecker's  case  there  is  much  unpublished 
work  of  any  real  value  which  has  yet  to  find 
its  way  into  print. 

At  these  far-off  parties,  "  literary "  as, 
indeed,  they  were,  I  do  not  remember  that 
there  was  much  flow  of  conversation  as  (for 
example)  the  Dublin  intellectuals  under- 
stand the   word,   or  as  the   modern  under- 

59 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

graduate  understands  it.  The  hours  were 
devoted  to  singing  and  to  laughter ;  the 
problems  of  the  world  were  let  go  hang ; 
taste,  Shakespeare  and  the  musical  glasses 
were  neglected  utterly.  Flecker  nearly  al- 
ways kept  the  room  in  a  roar  when  he  was 
present,  by  his  constant  flow  of  wit  and  his 
almost  unvarying  high  spirits.  I  remember, 
however,  one  amusing  occasion  on  which 
the  tables  were  turned  against  him  and  his 
repartee  extinguished.  I  had  taken  to 
dinner  at  the  Brixton  flat  a  friend  of  mine 
who  was  anxious  to  meet  Flecker,  but  who 
had  a  rooted  objection  to  "  Bohemia." 
Our  hostess — it  was  in  the  days  when 
Society  was  beginning  to  be  badly  bitten 
with  stage-mania — had  recently  been  tour- 
ing the  suburban  music-halls  in  a  sketch 
written  by  one  of  her  friends,  and  in  the 
course  of  her  wanderings  had  made  the 
acquaintance  of  a  little  Cockney  dancer 
named  Gertie.  It  was  Gertie  whom,  out  of 
60 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

sheer  naughtiness,  she  invited  to  make  the 
fourth  at  this  particular  dinner.  From  the 
beginning  nothing  went  well  for  Flecker. 
Whenever  he  caught  the  ball  of  conversation 
Gertie  snatched  it  ruthlessly.  She  was 
exceedingly  plain,  the  blameless  wife  of  a 
Brixton  dentist,  and  by  no  means  in  her 
first  youth.  But  in  her  own  strange  world  — 
that  of  the  smaller  music-halls —Gertie  was 
as  outstanding  a  character  as  Flecker  was 
in  his.  Her  humour  was  the  humour  of 
the  New  Cut,  her  back-chat  surpassed  a 
South  London  'bus  conductor  at  his  best. 
Never  before  have  I  listened  to  such  a 
torrent  of  "  lip  "  as  this  true  descendant 
of  Mrs.  Peachum  and  of  Diana  Trapes 
poured  out  on  the  poet's  (for  once)  defence- 
less head.  Whenever  poor  Flecker  got  in 
a  rapier-thrust,  he  was  promptly  bludgeoned 
by  devastating  references  to  "  Jerusalem  ' 
and  wholly  libellous  innuendoes  connecting 

his   swarthincss    with   a   neglect   of  baths  ! 

61 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

I  think  this  was  the  only  occasion  on  which 
I  ever  knew  him  to  be  verbally  at  a  dis- 
advantage. 

The  incident  which  really  formed  the 
beginning  of  my  more  intimate  acquaintance 
with  Flecker  was  connected  with  his  first 
volume  of  poems,  "  The  Bridge  of  Fire." 
We  were  all  of  us  in  a  great  state  of  excite- 
ment about  the  book  before  its  appearance, 
and  I  had  arranged  with  the  editor  to  review 
it  in  The  Academy.  When  I  received  my 
copy  I  found  that,  alas  !  it  did  not  come 
up  to  my  exaggerated  expectations,  and  in 
my  disappointment  I  proceeded  to  adminis- 
ter a  perfectly  sincere  if  rather  jejune 
"  slating."  My  notice,  when  it  came  out, 
caused  surprise  and  wrath  among  our  little 
circle.  All  my  friends  were,  indeed,  ex- 
tremely angry  with  me — except  Flecker. 
I  think  Flecker  must  have  been  amused  and 
interested  to  hear  one  note  of  honest  criti- 
cism, however  amateurish,  amid  a  chorus  of 
62 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

rather  fatuous  praise.  In  any  case  he  con- 
tented himself  with  sending  a  rejoinder  to 
The  Academy,  which  was  published  the 
week  after  my  notice — a  rejoinder  which 
showed  great  skill  and  the  most  exemplary 
good  manners.  And  when,  a  year  or  two 
later,  I  gathered  up  my  own  stray  verses 
from  the  periodicals  which  had  printed 
them  and  issued  my  first  book,  he  took  the 
trouble  to  review  it  in  a  Cambridge  paper 
in  characteristically  generous  terms. 

Our  connection  of  author  and  publisher, 
which  was  to  last  until  his  death,  began 
when,  in  1910,  I  started  a  monthly  magazine 
of  earnest  literary  aspirations.  In  the  first 
number  of  this  periodical,  J.  D.  Beazley,  of 
Christchurch,  Flecker 's  most  intimate  Ox- 
ford friend,  had  let  me  print  a  poem  of  his 
called  "  The  Visit,"  which  Trelawney  Dayrell- 
Reed  illustrated.  And  Flecker  himself  became 
a  fairly  frequent  contributor.  The  poems 
called    "  In    Memoriam,"     "  Pillage,"    and 

63 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

"  The  War  Song  of  the  Saracens,"  first 
appeared  in  its  pages. 

It  was  some  time  in  1910  that  I  got  the 
firm  which  owned  the  magazine  to  issue  a 
new  volume  of  Flecker's  verses,  to  which  he 
gave  the  title  "  Thirty-Six  Poems."  But 
the  concern  having,  unfortunately,  more 
good  intent  than  capital  or  business  manage- 
ment, the  volume  did  not  prosper,  and  on  the 
death  of  my  magazine  after  a  year's  struggle 
for  existence,  the  sheets  of  the  book  were 
transferred  to  Messrs.  J.  M.  Dent  and 
Sons,  Ltd.  Messrs.  Dent  reissued  the 
book  in  1911,  with  six  additional  pieces, 
under  the  more  familiar  title,  "  Forty-Two 
Poems." 

During  Flecker's  Cambridge  years  I  only 

met  him  occasionally  during  vacation,  and 

my    memory    in    regard    to    details    is    less 

trustworthy    than    for    the    earlier    period. 

But  I  recall  an  extraordinary  luncheon  at 

the  Petit  Riche  restaurant,  just  after  his 
64 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

return  from  a  summer  holiday,  I  think  in 
Wales.  (I  have  a  vague  notion  that  he  had 
been  staying  at  a  "  Fabian  Summer  School.") 
I  had  been  invited  to  meet  a  friend  of  his, 
a  friend  who  "  lived  in  South  Kensington." 
Awe-inspiring  details  were  whispered  to  me 
regarding  the  friend's  home,  and  Flecker 
had  clothed  himself  in  perilous  splendour 
for  the  call  which  he  proposed  to  make 
there  during  the  afternoon.  I  tell  myself 
my  memory  must  be  playing  me  tricks 
when  I  think  of  his  get-up  !  It  could  not 
have  been  a  bowler  hat,  a  dark  grey  frock- 
coat  with  watered  silk  facings,  trousers  to 
match,  a  skimpy  green-knitted  tie,  and 
yellow  boots  !  But  if  it  wasn't  just  that, 
it  was  a  mixture  of  garments  which  gave 
the  same  impression.  I  don't  think  he  found 
the  South  Kensington  atmosphere  very  con- 
genial ;  and  I  never  saw  him  arrayed  so 
wonderfully  again.  Very  shortly  after  this 
he  left  England  for  the  East.     I  fancy  that 

65 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

the  last  time  I  saw  him  in  the  flesh  was  at 
a  luncheon  at  Beguinot's  in  Old  Compton 
Street,  when  J.  J.  Knox  was  present.  On 
that  occasion  I  heard  once  again  the  story 
of  their  adventures  during  the  Wine  riots, 
a  story  which  has  been  retold  in  an  earlier 
chapter. 

When  I  look  back  on  James  Flecker  and 
remember  what  he  meant  to  his  wide  circle 
of  friends,  it  is  to  feel  much  more  than  a 
sense  of  personal  loss.  It  is  to  feel  that 
something  has  gone  out  of  life  which  the 
new  generation  does  not  know,  perhaps  can- 
not be  expected  to  know,  in  view  of  the 
grisly  shadow  under  which  it  has  grown  up  : 
something  rare  and  irrecoverable — a  radi- 
ance, a  generosity  of  heart  and  mind,  a 
natural  (not  stimulated)  ecstasy  which  the 
robust  commercialism  of  the  present  day 
neither  produces  nor  encourages.  Flecker's 
attitude  towards  life  was  what  that  of  the 

aristocrat  is  supposed  to  be,  but  usually  is 
66 


James  Elroy  Flecked    1909). 


Facing  pa  i  ' 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

not.      He    had    caught    some    of   the    spirit 
of  the   Italian  renaissance  ;    and,   in   com- 
pensation for  the  shortness  of  his  days,  he 
was  given  the  capacity  to  live  them  with 
+he  intensity  of  one  of  those  figures  whom 
Cellini  has  described  for  us,  and  to  appre- 
ciate the  earth's  loveliness  in  a  way  which 
has  been  given  to  few  men  since  that  fierce 
sweet  renewal  of  springtime  in  the  Western 
world.    He  was,  as  far  as  I  know,  completely 
without  ulterior  motive  or  base  ambitions. 
He  never  could  have  played  the  now  too 
familiar  game  of  literary  and  social  intrigue 
by    which    verse-writers    of   only    moderate 
talent  inflate  themselves  into  great  figures. 
His  conception  of  what  is  required  of  those 
who  practise  the  art  of  poetry  would  have 
made  any  such  proceeding  simply  unthink- 
able—a  game   for   bagmen,    not   for  kings. 
Even  in  his  critical  appreciations  and  denun- 
ciations, which  I  think  often  erred  on  the 
side    of    over-enthusiasm    and    were    occa- 

67 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

sionally  at  fault,  he  was  at  all  events  never 
cheap.  Nothing,  in  this  connection,  showed 
him  in  a  more  favourable  light  than  his 
rage  when  some  of  the  English  vers  librists 
and  their  associates  were  leading  a  hue-and- 
cry  against  the  Victorians,  damning  Tenny- 
son and  Browning  right  and  left  in  a  noisy 
effort  to  call  attention  to  their  own  not 
very  successful  experiments.  Flecker 's 
sense  of  the  continuity  of  the  English  poetic 
tradition  made  this  kind  of  vulgarity  un- 
bearable ;  a  wanton  breaking  of  the  fourth 
commandment  ! 

I  have  put  down  these  odds  and  ends  of 
recollections  for  whatever  they  may  be 
worth,  in  the  hope  that  by  so  doing  I  may 
encourage  others  who  knew  him  better  to 
search  their  memories  before  it  is  too  late. 
For,  if  Flecker  was  not  a  "  great  genius," 
he  was  a  man  of  great  intellectual  integrity 
and  courage,  a  superb  craftsman  with  a  real 
devotion  to  his  art.  His  work  has  certainly 
68 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

the  qualities  of  permanence,  and  the  interest 
which  future  generations  are  likely  to  take 
in  his  personality  and  in  the  details  of  his 
short  life  is  very  likely  unrealised  at  present 
by  many  who  were  his  contemporaries. 


69 


IV 


IV 


A  FTER  Flecker's  departure  for  the 
/  %  East  I  heard  very  little  news  of 
him  until  the  beginning  of  1913, 
when  I  became  associated  with  the  new 
publishing  firm  of  Max  Goschen.  (Owing  to 
the  regretted  death  of  its  proprietor,  who 
was  killed  in  the  early  days  of  the  war,  this 
firm  no  longer  exists  and  its  copyrights  have 
been  distributed  among  other  publishers.) 
Whether  we  corresponded  at  all  during  the 
interval,  I  cannot  remember.  I  suppose  we 
must  have  done,  since  I  knew  his  address. 
But,  unfortunately,  I  have  not  kept  any  of 
the  early  letters.  The  first  letter  from 
Flecker  on  which  I  have  been  able  to 
lay  my  hands  is  dated  January  22  [1913]. 
F  73 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

It  is  addressed  from  the  British  Consulate- 
General,  Beyrouth,  Syria,  and  was  written, 
apparently,  in  answer  to  my  request  to  be 
allowed  to  use  some  of  his  work  in  an 
anthology  of  modern  verse  which  I  was 
intending,  at  that  time,  to  compile.  The 
letter  runs  as  follows  : 

"  My  dear  Goldring, 

I  was  in  London  a  few  days  in  Decem- 
ber— and  asked  after  you — but  no  one 
seemed  to  know  where  you  were.  I  tried 
hard  to  get  a  job  in  town  but  couldn't.  I 
never  get  paid  a  penny  for  anything  and 
my  book  has  not  yet  sold  200  copies.  I  am 
trying  to  place  a  play.  I  am  in  utter  despair 
and  suppose  I  shall  have  to  live  in  this 
bloody  country  all  my  life. 

Of  course  take  anything  you  like.  I  hate 
all  modern  poetry  and  think  it  perfect  .  .  . 
— except  Yeats  and  Kipling  :  these  Mase- 
fields — though  he  was  a  great  man  once  — 
74 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

Gibsons,  Pounds,  Abercrombies,  and  people 
make  me  fume  with  rage. 

Q.'s  Victorian  Verse  has  got  my 

Saracens, 
Riouperoux, 

and  my  friend  Marsh  has  got 

The  Queen's  Song, 
Joseph  and  Mary. 

Don't  take  any  of  the  above  but  any- 
thing else  you  like. 

I  have  much  to  thank  you  for,  my  dear 
Goldring.  I  am  fairly  well  known  now  — 
that  is  to  say,  about  as  known  as  Ezra 
Pound  or  T.  Sturge  Moore— but  for  £500 
a  year  and  a  berth  in  England  I'd  turn 
Wesleyan. 

Yours  bitterly, 

James  Elroy  Flecker." 

I  dropped  the  idea  of  making  an  an- 
thology as  soon  as  I  discovered  what  a  job 

75 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

of  work  it  was  going  to  be,  and,  instead, 
determined  to  try  to  get  for  my  firm  a 
volume  of  Flecker's  poetry.  By  this  time 
my  belief  in  him  was  unshakable  and  I 
knew  that  sooner  or  later  he  was  bound  to 
come  into  his  own.  I  wrote  offering  to 
take  the  financial  risk  of  a  new  book  by 
him  (he  had  previously  been  forced  to  pub- 
lish on  commission,  except  in  the  case  of 
"  Thirty-Six  Poems  "),  and  to  pay  a  small 
advance,  £10,  on  account  of  royalties. 

Flecker's  reply  was  dated  March  6th  and 
runs  as  follows  : 

"  Just  a  line  on  some  filthy  imported 
notepaper  to  thank  you  very  much  indeed 
for  your  kindness  in  getting  me  the  offer 
of  £10. 

I  think  there  is  enough  for  a  volume — but 
I  had  some  idea  of  adding  a  preface  — would, 
in  fact,  if  needed. 

I  don't  want  the  issue  of  my  poems  to 
76 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

clash  with  the  publication  of  my  novel  — 
there  ought  to  be  a  month's  interval.  I 
suggest  that  you  get  Messrs.  Goschen  to  ask 

when  he  is  going  to  publish  the  novel, 

and  act  according.  I  have  only  just  sent  the 
MS.  I  have  no  proofs  and  shan't  get  'em  for 
some  time. 

All  my  press  notices  should  be  either  with 
you  or  with  Dent.  There  have  been  some 
good  ones  (Daily  News,  Athenaeum)  of  the 
42.  .  .   . 

Could  you  tell  me  the  name  of  a  press 
agent  less  indecently  slipshod  than  Messrs. 

• 

The  press  notices  on  the  cap  of  the  42 
were  rottenly  chosen.  I  bar  the  idea,  how- 
ever, of  printing  them  inside  the  book  unless 
it's  done  in  very  small  print  and  on  different 
paper.  Even  then  it's  pretty  horrid.  The 
most  eulogistic  of  the  dogs  write  such  terrible 
,  aias. 

I  read  through  your  poems.     Honestly,  I 

77 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

like  them  extremely.  I  confess  they  seem  to 
me  to  have  a  charming  atmosphere  of  taking 
seriously  a  fashion  of  thought  that  is  just  out 
of  date — but  that  is  a  very  great  charm  — 
and  I  think  of  Pater's  essay  on  Lamb.  It 
seems  to  me  you  aim  at  something  simple 
and  graceful  and  attain  it,  while  other  rotters 
with  their  Exultations  and  Sicilian  Idylls 
aim  very  high  and  write  God-forsaken 
formless  muck. 

With  many  thanks  for  getting  me  a  good 
offer  and  for  sending  me  your  volume, 

Ever  yours, 

J.  E.  Flecker. 

Your  little  poems  of  London  streets  make 
me  feel  rottenly  sentimental,  imprisoned 
perhaps  for  life  in  this  godless  sunshiny 
palm-tree  hole  without  an  intelligent  soul  to 
speak  to." 

I  was  delighted  when  Flecker  fell  in  with 
our  suggestion  :  still  more  so  when  the  MS. 
78 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

of  "  The  Golden  Journey  to  Samarkand  ' 
eventually  reached  the  office.  I  wrote  to 
promise  that  I  would  do  anything  I  possibly 
could  to  get  the  book  adequately  noticed 
and  to  push  the  sales.  And  at  the  same 
time  I  urged  him  to  write  the  now  famous 
Preface,  and  if  possible  to  make  it  con- 
troversial, in  order  to  stir  the  reviewers  into 
animation.  The  task  of  writing  the  Preface 
and  of  correcting  the  proofs — he  almost  re- 
wrote the  book  in  proof,  and  substituted 
several  new  poems  for  those  which  he  thought 
not  up  to  the  standard  of  the  rest  of  the 
volume — must  have  exhausted  him,  for  he 
was  already  seriously  ill.  The  following 
letter,  written  in  pencil  on  May  10th,  1913, 
reveals  his  nervous  and  overwrought  con- 
dition : 


it 


Really,  your  people  ought  to  take  the 
trouble  to  understand  how  long  it  takes  a 
letter  to  get  to  Syria.     I  wrote  that  dam 

79 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

Preface  and  sent  it  within  about  a  week  of 
getting  the  letter.  /  am  now  waiting  for 
proofs  of  the  Preface  and  the  extra  poems, 
which  must  be  published  at  all  costs,  and 
I  must  see  the  proofs  because  they're  most 
terribly  hashed.  The  other  proofs  are  cor- 
rected.   I  have  sent  off  everything. 

I  am  very  ill  again  and  probably  shall 
come  to  England.  Can't  work  at  much  and 
hardly  at  this  letter.  The  Preface  was  an 
awful  strain.  If  the  printers  make  a  fuss 
I  will  pay  for  the  rather  heavy  alterations. 
I  must  have  the  book  just  as  good  as  it  can 
be.  I  am  anxiously  awaiting  proofs  of  the 
preface  and  remaining  poems.' 


55 


Flecker  did  not,  of  course,  return  to 
England  (which  he  was  never  to  see  again)  ; 
but  on  his  doctor's  advice  went  instead  to 
Switzerland.  His  next  letter,  dated  June  5th, 
came  from  Leysin-sur-Aigle  : 


80 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

"  Thank  the  Lord  this  place  is  curing  me. 
The  journey  nearly  killed  me.  There  is 
nothing  terribly  wrong — but  I  shall  take 
a  month  or  two  to  recover,  and  always 
have  to  live  with  precaution.  Meantime 
many  thanks  for  your  kind  letter.  Here- 
with I  have  sent  the  proofs  complete. 
Please  look  over  the  revise — or  '  Taoping,' 
in  its  new  version,  will  come  out  in  a 
hash. 

Left  out  first  page  of  Preface  as  being 
rather  babyish.  You  might  let  me  know 
what  you  think  of  the  book — and  especially 
of  my  alterations  to  '  Gates  of  Damascus  ' 
and  '  Taoping.'  I  am  immensely  proud  of 
it.  I've  turfed  out  all  the  rot.  It  seems 
to  me  — and  to  the  few  critics  who  have  seen 
it— to  be  miles  ahead  of  the  'Forty-two.' 
If  the  publisher  wants  to  puff  me  he  can 
safely  say  that  the  Oriental  Poems  are 
unique  in  English. 

I  do  wish  one  could  have  a  few  de  luxe 

81 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

copies  (as  they  do  in  France),  on  fine  paper 
with  fine  binding. 

I  have,  alas  !  lost  a  good  deal  more  than 
£10  in  not  having  time  to  get  all  the  poems 
into  mags.  In  particular  '  Oak  and  Olive  ' 
was  being  kept  by  the  Fortnightly,  and  they 
sent  it  back  because  they  had  no  time  to 
publish  it  by  June.  But  never  mind,  let's 
out  with  the  book  at  once  ! 

I  have  some  glorious  translations  from 
Paul  Fort  and  other  modern  Frenchmen, 
but  I  preferred  to  keep  '  The  Golden 
Journey '  original  from  beginning  to 
end.  .  .  ." 

I  heard  from  him  again  a  week  later,  still 
from  Leysin— a  long  and  very  lucid  business 
letter,  chiefly  about  "The  King  of  Alsander," 
and  the  behaviour  of  another  publisher 
who,  after  accepting  the  book  and  getting 
Flecker  to  alter  it  two  or  three  times, 
eventually  declined  to  bring  it  out,  on  the 
82 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

ground  that  he  had  "  lost  interest."  (It 
is  only  fair  to  the  publisher  in  question  to 
assume  that  there  were  two  sides  to  the 
dispute.) 

"  Hotel  Belvedere, 

Leysin,  Switzerland. 
June  llth  [1913]. 
My  dear  Goldring, 

(1)  Many  thanks  for  your  letter.  I  am 
most  frightfully  glad  about  the  Edition  de 
luxe  :  I  suppose  I  shall  be  allowed  one  or 
two  copies  for  myself.  But  what  about 
sending  round  notices  of  it  ? 

As  for  the  Printer's  note,  I'll  pay  any- 
thing in  reason — but  I  don't  consider  myself 
liable  for  additions  or  omissions  of  complete 
poems.  Against  the  omissions  can  be  put 
my  writing  the  Preface  specially  to  please 
the  publishers.    1  am  liable  to  pay  for 

Alteration  to  '  Gates  of  Damascus,' 

One  verse  altered  in  '  Hyali,' 

J  do.  do.  '  Oak  and  Olive,' 

83 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

About  six  lines   altered  at  beginning  of 
Preface, 

Alteration  of  Taoping, 
as  far  as  they  are  above  10  per  cent,  etc., 
as  per  contract.  The  apparently  extensive 
minor  alterations  in  the  first  few  pages  of  the 
proofs  are  due  to  the  gross  carelessness  of  the 
printers.  The  last  few  pages  were  20  times 
better  done— except  that  the  fellow,  appar- 
ently by  way  of  a  dirty  joke,  put  tips 
instead  of  lips  in  no  less  than  four  separate 
places  —obviously  on  purpose.  I  don't  think 
the  joke  was  very  funny. 

The  advertisement  is  excellent. 

(2)  I  have  long  had  a  scheme  for  bringing 
out  an  anthology  of  French  verse.  Poets  of 
To-day  and  Yesterday —from  after  Hugo 
and  Musset  and  not  including  them,  to  the 
present  day.  Each  poet  would  be  preceded 
by  a  short  notice. 

In  the  idea  of  the  short  notice  and  in  the 

period  traversed  the  book  would  thus  re- 
84 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

semble  Walch's  great  three-volume  work  — 
but  in  no  other  way. 

(1)  There  would  be  a  large  and  very 
different  choice  of  the  more  important  people 
and  none  of  the  pages  of  dreary  rot  by  the 
great  unknown. 

(2)  The  criticism  at  the  beginning  would 
be  original  and  not  borrowed. 

(3)  The  whole  book  would  not  be  more 
than  one  volume. 

It  would  mean  a  lot  of  toil,  but  very 
pleasant  toil,  doing  this  book — but  what  I 
want  to  know  is  —would  it  pay  ?  I  think 
if  a  sale  in  France  could  be  arranged  for  it 
might.  But  the  sale  in  France  would  have 
to  be  arranged  through  the  Mercure  de 
France,  so  as  to  facilitate  matters  of  copy- 
right for  the  more  modern  fellows.  I  should 
want  three  or  four  pounds  for  buying  books 
to  cut  up,  typing,  copying,  and  other  exes. 

(3)  I  told  you was  going  to  publish 

a  novel.     He  made  me  revise  it  twice,  the 

85 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

last  time  in  December.  I  half-killed  myself 
getting  it  finished  this  January — and  sent  it 
off.  No  answer  for  three  months,  and  then 
the  inconceivable  person  returns  the  novel 
and  says  he  doesn't  feel  like  publishing  it 
after  all  this  time,  as  he  has  lost  interest  in 
it.  And  he  is  under  contract  to  publish  it. 
He  now  will  not  answer  my  letter.  Give 
me  some  advice.  I've  got  my  contract 
somewhere— at  Cheltenham  I  think,  but  my 
papers  are  disturbed.  I  must  obviously 
take  legal  action  and  claim  about  £200 
damages.  I  had  put  in  altogether  4  mortal 
months'  work  on  the  novel.  .  .  . 

The  novel,  originally  a  very  poor  pro- 
duction, is  now  a  very  jolly  and  fantastic 
work.  Whether  it  will  sell  or  not  I  don't 
believe  a  publisher  in  the  world  could  say. 
It  may  take  or  it  mayn't.  I'll  send  it  you 
if  you  like.    But  — 

(a)  Messrs.  Goschen  may  well  fight  shy  of 
a  book  which  another  publisher  has 
86 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

broken   his   contract   to   evade   pub- 
lishing, 
(b)  It  might  be  better  to  get  compensation 
before  I  get  another  publisher.   Yet  it 
might  again  be  better  the  other  way. 

If  you  care  to  go  round  to  and  see 

what  he  means  and  tell  him  I'm  going  to 
claim  a  round  £200  from  him  at  once,  I 
should  be  only  too  glad,  but  I  really,  I  con- 
fess, see  not  the  slightest  reason  why  I 
should  presume  even  to  ask  you  to  do  any- 
thing so  boring.  But  I  think  with  your 
literary  experience  you  might  be  kind 
enough  to  give  me  some  advice  and  perhaps 
to  give  me  the  address  of  a  solicitor  who  is 
a  friend  of  literary  men. 

Ever  yours, 
James  Elroy  Flecker. 
You  will  have  the  revise  back  by  return 
when  it  comes." 

Since  Flecker  directly  asked  my  advice  I 
had  to  tell  him,  out  of  a  wealth  of  unenviable 

87 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

experience,  that  he  did  not  stand  very  much 
chance  of  receiving  any  damages,  whether 
by  legal  or  any  other  kind  of  action. 
Eventually  he  sent  the  book  to  Messrs. 
Goschen. 

When  the  MS.  of  "  The  King  of  Alsander  " 
reached  me  I  must  confess  that  my  heart 
sank  a  little,  in  spite  of  all  the  pleasant 
memories  which  the  opening  chapters  re- 
vived. I  did  not  think  the  book  had  much 
chance  of  selling,  or,  indeed,  that  it  particu- 
larly deserved  to  sell,  and  I  wrote  to  Flecker 
explaining  my  reasons  for  this  opinion. 

His  reply  is  dated  June  21st  (1913)  : 

"  Thanks  so  much  for  writing  promptly 
and  at  such  length.  The  novel  is  a  most 
patchy  affair — I  quite  agree  with  you.  I 
am  not  a  novelist  because  I  don't  really 
think  novels  worth  writing — at  the  bottom 
of  my  heart.  Yet  I  did  not  burn  the  old 
4  King  of  Alsander '  —it  is,  by  God,  seven 
88 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

years  since  I  lost  the  first  three  chapters  of 
it  on  the  way  to  Paris  with  .  .  .  and  .  .  . 
of  your  acquaintance — because  it  has,  with 
all  its  faults,  some  passages  which  I  think 
rather  jolly,  and  because  even  if  a  bit 
laboured  in  parts,  it  is  such  a  joyously  silly 
performance. 

I  have  written  to  Goschens  accepting  their 
offer. 

A  drama  is  a  thing,  now,  that  is  worth 
writing.  I  have  had  most  encouraging 
letters  about  my  work  in  that  direction  from 
Drinkwater,  of  the  Birmingham  Repertory 
Theatre ;  but  I  hope  that  Granville  Barker 
and  no  other  will  take  up  '  Hassan,'  my 
Oriental  play.  It  may  interest  you  to  know 
that  Yasmin  is  out  of  my  play  — was  written 
for  it— and  also  'The  Golden  Journey  to 
Samarkand '  is  nothing  but  the  final  scene. 
I  admit  a  little  verse  into  my  play  here  and 
there. 

Read  the  poem  called  '  The  Golden 
g  89 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

Journey,'  and  consider  the  '  pilgrim  with 
the  beautiful  voice '  to  be  Hassan,  the 
hero  of  a  whole  drama,  and  think  what  it 
would  sound  like  actually  on  the  stage, 
with  Granville  Barker  scenery — moonlight. 

More  alive  to-day.  I  hope  the  novel  may 
succeed  after  all.  It  is  pleasant  of  you  to 
be  so  prompt.  The  misery  of  literary 
people !  The  Spectator  and  The  Nation 
will   return   or   accept   pretty   quick.      The 

' '  is  hopeless,  utterly.     ' '  are,  I 

think,  mad.  Good  God,  if  one  ran  the 
rottenest    of   little    Vice-Consulates    in    the 

way  the  ' '  is  run,  there'd  be  a  row  in 

a  month  ! 

Ever  yours  thankfully, 

J.  E.  Flecker. 

P.S.  — (1)  Should  much  like  to  read  your 
novel ;    didn't  know  you'd  written  one. 

(2)  What  do  you  think— if  by  chance 
'  The  Golden  Journey '  gets  known  —of 
90 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

having  the  Oriental  poems  (plus  '  Saracens  ' 
and  '  Ballad  of  Iskander '  from  42)  illus- 
trated by  Syme  for  a  Xmas  volume  ? 

(3)  Shan't  anthologise  after  what  you 
told  me.    Thanks." 

I  had  one  more  letter  from  him  from 
Leysin  (dated  June  30,  1913),  in  which  the 
following  interesting  passage  occurs  : 

'  In  Phaeacia  '  (the  rottenest  poem  in  the 
book)  should  appear  in  Everyman  and  '  Taop- 
ing  '  in  The  Spectator  (eh,  what  ?  the  citadel 
of  respectability  stormed  !)  this  week.  Did 
you  see  Solomon  Eagle's  extremely  amusing 
jibe  at  me  in  The  New  Statesman  ?  Who  is 
he  ?  Am  getting  fatter  and  stronger.  I 
hope  to  be  in  England  producing  my  play 
this  autumn.  Why  does  no  one  translate 
great  French  books  like  Jules  Renard's 
'  Lanterne  Sourde  '  or  Claude  Farrere's  mar- 
vellous '  Battaille  '  ?  " 

91 


It 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

The  Golden  Journey  to  Samarkand ' 
was  issued  in  the  early  part  of  July,  and  was 
a  success  almost  from  the  first.  Mr.  Frank 
Savery  has  kindly  given  me  permission  to 
print  the  following  letter  analysing  the  con- 
tents of  the  book,  which  Flecker  addressed 
to  him  from  Leysin  at  the  time  of  its  appear- 
ance : 


tt 


Hotel  Belvedere, 

Leysin. 
(July,  1913.)  Saturday. 

My  dearest  Franko, 

Ever  so  many  thanks  for  your  letter 
of  criticism.  Helle  told  me  particularly  to 
tell  you  that  she  agreed  with  you  practically 
in  everything.  So  do  I.  I  think  you  under- 
rate c  Santorin  '  — much  admired  by  Dun- 
sany,  by  the  way.  J  Lord  Arnaldos  '  was 
after  all  a  translation.  Otherwise  I  agree 
with  you,  particularly  in  your  damnations. 
I  might  explain  that  the  Publishers  wrote 
92 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

asking  if  I  had  anything  for  them  at  once 
and  I  very  hurriedly  replied —nothing  but 
a  new  volume  of  poetry.  I  packed  off  a 
weird  collection  of  stuff  to  make  up  a  volume 
— including  a  revision  of  the  '  Bridge  of 
Fire.'  I  then  sat  down  to  write  the  book  — 
and  it  was  after  I  got  the  proofs  I  managed  to 
hoof  out  all  sorts  of  godless  rot,  and  replace 
them  by  4  In  Hospital,'  '  Brumana,'  '  Taop- 
ing  '  ;  and  also  just  at  the  last  minute  I 
suddenly  rewrote  '  The  Gates  of  Damascus  ' 
and  enlarged  it.  There  are  I  reckon  still 
two  rotten  poems  in  the  book  — '  Phaeacia  ' 
(an  unconscious  imitation  of  Yeats  and 
Jack  Beazley)  and  the  '  Sacred  Incident '  — 
both  of  which  I  should,  however,  describe 
as  harmless  rather  than  offensive. 

It  may  amuse  you  to  know  a  little  of  the 
history  of  these  things  :  you  certainly  de- 
serve to  be  told  if  it  amuses  you. 

The  Preface.  Written  when  I  was  pretty 
ill— like  all  the  later  poems— is   not  quite 

93 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

sincere.  My  chief  desire  was  to  say  what  I 
thought  was  wanted  to  shake  up  the  critics  : 
not  to  expound  the  essence  of  poetry,  which 
would  take  500  pages.  The  beginning  is 
ugly  enough  with  '  theory '  repeated  so 
often — but  I  reread  the  end  with  pleasure 
and  thank  you  for  the  word  '  manly.' 

2.  The  Epilogue  is  the  last  scene  of 
1  Hassan  '  — or  rather  I  wrote  '  Hassan  '  to 
lead  up  to  the  Epilogue.  A  moonlight  scene, 
a  sudden  burst  into  poetry  (you  know  my 
trick  from  '  Don  Juan '),  and  the  singer 
with  the  beautiful  voice  is  the  chief  character 
of  the  play — the  famous  singer  Ishak  — 
anima  naturaliter  Christiana.  If  it  doesn't 
give  the  public  shivers  down  the  back  when 
it  is  acted  in  its  place,  I'll  never  write  again. 

3.  '  The  Gates  of  Damascus.'  I  consider 
this  to  be  my  greatest  poem — and  I  am 
glad  you  seem  to  agree.  It  was  inspired  by 
Damascus  itself  by  the  way.  I  loathe  the 
East  and  the  Easterns  and  spent  all  my 
94 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

time  there  dreaming  of  Oxford.  Yet  it 
seems — even  to  hardened  Orientalists — that 
I  understand. 

4.  '  Yasmin  '  is  an  anthology  piece.  It 
is  part  of  '  Hassan  '  — written  for  it  and 
should  sound  well  in  its  place. 

5.  '  Saadabad  '  is,  with  '  Areiya,'  perhaps 
the  only  poem  with  individual  passion  I  have 
written.  Though  verses  1,  3,  and  4  of 
Pt.  I  are  translations  from  the  Turkish,  the 
poem  is  the  most  passionately  sincere  I  have 
ever  written.  It  was  written  straight  out 
and  not  a  line  revised. 

6.  Of  course  the  '  Turkish  Lady  '  won't 
wash.  The  poem  is  a  pretty  close  translation 
in  the  book. 

7.  'Doris,'  dear  Frank— it's  very  short 
and  I  don't  think  it's  easy  to  say  how  sin- 
cere. Mightn't  it  come  out  of  the  Greek 
Anthology  ?  I  mean  by  the  ship  the  Ship 
of  Dreams. 

8.  Glad  you  like  4  Hyali,'     I  never  saw 

95 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

the  island  (which  exists),  but  I  passed  it  in 
the  night — and  I  have  seen  many  isles  of 
the  JEgean. 

9.  Don't  you  think  the  legend  at  least  of 
'  Santorin  '  one  of  the  loveliest  in  the  world  ? 
I  wonder  if  you  weird  Catholics  realise  that 
the  Middle  Age  is  still  in  flower  in  the 
iEgean.  '  That  man  married  a  Syren,'  said 
a  peasant  once  to  my  wife — and  showed  the 
man  ! 

10.  A  ship  an  isle  you  don't  mention.  A 
very  subtile  poem,  Frank,  and  when  you  read 
Henri  de  Regnier  you  will  find  some  more. 

11.  '  Oak  and  Olive.'  A  jest  after  all  in 
the  good  old  manner.  No,  I  wouldn't  have 
it  out  of  the  volume,  though,  of  course,  it's 
very  slight. 

12.  '  Brumana.'  Horrible  misprint — in 
lines  you  quoted  —mountain  should  be  moun- 
tains. 

Poem    sincere    enough,    good    God,    was 
thinking    of    the    Bournemouth    pines. 
96 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

Lavdanon  is  the  Greek  name  of  the 
Cytisus,  a  rock  rose  which  makes  the  woods 
lovely  in  Syria.    It  has  a  queer  little  scent. 

13.  '  Areiya  '  was,  as  it  says,  written  in 
just  three  minutes  and  never  altered. 

14.  My  wife  likes  'Bryan'  :  I  hate  it  — 
or  rather  find  it  cold.  But  the  story  (a 
Greek  story  again)  is  jolly  enough. 

15.  Damned  clever  of  me  to  write  a  poem 
as  far  out  of  myself  as  the  4  Painter's  Mis- 
tress.' My  wife  has  not  ceased  wondering. 
Suggested  by  a  play  of  Battaille's  and 
written  on  the  Lebanon. 

16.  Oh,  I  did  sweat  when  very  ill  over 
1  Taoping,'  and  turned  it  from  rot  into  a 
good  poem  of  workmanship.  Suggested  by 
a  strange  amazing  book  of  one  Daguerches 
called  '  Consolata  fille  du  Soleil.  .  .  .' 

Concerning  the  Chinese.    Frank,  I  almost 

accuse  you  of  insincerity.     Do  you  really 

shudder    at    a    Japanese    print  ?      Do    you 

really   believe   in   the    '  inhuman   Oriental ' 

97 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

myth  ?    Or  do  you  think  you  ought  to  believe 
in  the  myth  ? 

Don't  you  think  that  the  healthy  honest 
way  for  a  European  to  look  at  a  Chinaman 
or  a  nigger  is  to  laugh  at  him  ?  Don't  you 
think  they  are  there  for  the  joy  of  the 
picturesque — as  I  portray  them  in  '  Taop- 
ing'  ? 

The  Turks  too.  I  hate  them  because  I 
am  a  modern  civilised  man.  Catholics 
should  and  do  love  them.  Why  is  Turkey 
rotten  ?  Why  is  the  Turk  an  inefficient 
gentleman  ?  Islam  ?  Nonsense  :  not  en- 
tirely. Simply  because  he  thinks  middle 
age  and  is  middle  age.  Saladin  and  Richard 
were  both  very  near  each  other.  They 
talked  the  same  language.  They  both  be- 
lieved in  Aristotle.  But  Saladin  is  still 
Saladin — arguing  with  a  twist — because  his 
'  Aristotle  '  was  translated  for  him  and  he 
never  learnt  Latin  at  the  Renaissance. 
Richard  is  now  King  George  V,  ,  ,  , 
98 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

Do  read  Paul  Fort.  Perhaps  the 
greatest  of  all  French  poets.  The  humour 
is  wonderful.  Have  just  read  '  Mortcerf ' 
and  an  introduction  which  quotes  the  most 
amazingly  jolly  things. 

i  Du  temps  qu'on  allait  encore  aux 
baleines,  si  loin  que  9a  faisait,  mat'lot, 
pleurer  nos  belles,  y  avait  sur  chaque 
route  un  Jesus  en  croix,  y  avait  des  marquis 
couverts  de  dentelles,  y  avait  la  Sainte 
Vierge  et  y  avait  le  Roi.' 

2.  '  Du  temps  qu'on  allait  encore  aux 
baleines,  si  loin  que  5a  faisait,  mat'lot, 
pleurer  les  belles,  y  avait  des  marins  qui 
avaient  la  foi,  et  des  grands  seigneurs  qui 
crachaient  sur  elle,  et  y  avait  la  Sainte 
Vierge,  et  y  avait  le  Roi.' 

3.  '  Eh  bien,  a  present  tout  le  monde  est 
content,  c'est  pas  pour  dire,  mat'lot,  mais 
on  est  content !  Y  a  plus  de  grands  seig- 
neurs   ni    Jesus    qui   tiennent,   y  a  la   Re- 

99 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

publique  et  y  a  l'President,  et  y  a  plus  de 
baleinesS 

That  should  send  you  round  to  the 
Bookshop. 

So  sorry  you  have  neuralgia  :  hope  you 
are  better. 

4  Hassan  '  nearly  ended.  You  shall  see  it 
when  complete. 

Write  again  soon  as  your  letters  are  a 
great  joy. 

I  don't  believe  in  Barbey's  Catholicism  a 
bit.    See  Jules  Lemaitre  on  him. 

Thine, 

James." 

Flecker  at  about  this  time  moved  from 
Leysin  to  Montana,  and  the  next  letter  from 
him  which  I  preserved  came  from  the  latter 
place  and  is  dated  August  31st. 

"  I  have  been  a  most  shameful  time 
answering  your  delightful  and  enthusiastic 
100 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

letter  of  congratulation,  for  which  I  thank 
you  most  heartily.  The  reviews — especially 
The  Times  and  the  Morning  Post  — have  been 
good  enough  for  Shakespeare  :  I  do  hope 
they  will  even  be  enough  to  sell  a  few  copies 
of  the  book  ;  I  should  hate  Goschens  to  be 
badly  had  by  the  transaction. 

I  have  been  bothered  lately  trying  to 
find  a  new  place  to  live  in,  and  only  got  here 
after  a  frightful  lot  of  bother.  I  am  pretty 
sick  of  life.  I've  finished  my  play,  but  I 
don't  suppose  it  will  ever  be  played. 

Would  you  be  so  awfully  good  as  to  tell  me 

what  a  poor ought  to  do  if  he  wants  to 

make  a  little  gold  by  writing  (and  drawing 
— my  wife  can  draw)  advertisements  ?  I 
mean,  is  it  any  good  just  inventing  adver- 
tisements for  Pears'  soap  and  sending  it 
straight  to  Manager,  Pears'  Soap,  or  ought 
one  to  work  through  an  advertising  agency 
and,  if  so,  do  you  know  one  ?  Your  experi- 
ence of  these  things  is  so  vast.    It  seems  to 

101 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

me  one  might  do  something  paying  in  that 
line. 

I  don't  think  you  answered  me  about  my 
idea  of  making  a  Xmas  illustrated  book 
out  of  my  Eastern  poems.  Trelawney  could 
do  it  very  well. 

I  shall  write  a  book  one  day  on  how 
to  spend  money  in  a  jolly  way,  for  men 
of  moderate   income   (£500-£l500   a   year). 

Tell  the they  ought  to  travel.     The 

book   will   sell    by   the    hundred   thousand 
million  on  the  railways'  bookstalls. 

Do  tell  me  about  advertisements. 
Ever  yours, 
James  Elroy  Flecker. 

Hope  you  had  or  are  having  a  sumptuous 
holiday." 

From  this  time  onwards,  inspired  perhaps 
by  the  splendid  reception  which  nearly  all 
the  critics  accorded  to  "  The  Golden  Journey 
to  Samarkand,"  he  sent  me  a  stream  of  pro- 
102 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

jects  for  books,  none  of  which  he  was  ever 
destined  to  carry  out.  The  only  one  which 
he  seems  seriously  to  have  begun  is  a  trans- 
lation of  "  Virgil,  iEneid  VI,"  of  which  in  a 
letter  dated  "  Sunday,"  he  writes  as  follows  : 

'  I  have  to  thank  you  sincerely  for  the 
raising  of  my  royalty.  Would  you  let  me 
know  about  when  you  expect  to  publish 
'  The  King  of  Alsander  '  ? 

My  next  book  is  half  written.    It  is,  I'm 
afraid,  rather  horrifying.     This  is  the  title  — 

6  An  interpretation 

in  Blank  verse 

of 

Virgil,  ,Eneid  VI, 

based  on  the  poetic  value  of  the  Sounds, 

together  with  the  Latin  text 

and  ten  prefaces, 

by 

James  Elroy  Flecker, 

120    pp.      Wide    margins.      Paper,    3/6  (?) 

Ready  in  February.' 

103 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

Seriously,  this  is  exactly  the  title  I  intend 
to  give  the  book,  with  which  I  am  well 
advanced  already.  The  book  is  simply  an 
attempt  to  do  a  translation  of  '  Virgil '  as 
satisfactory  as  Fitzgerald's  '  Omar '  —a 
translation  which  will  utterly  eclipse  the 
very  numerous  and  very  feeble  attempts 
hitherto  existing. 

The  ten  prefaces  will  be  as  combative  as 
Bernard  Shaw's,  and  occupy  some  forty 
pages.  They  will  be  on  the  translation  of 
sounds,  on  blank  verse,  on  Hell  literature, 
on  preceding  translations  of  '  Virgil,'  on 
'  Modern  Scholarship,'  on  the  '  Modern 
Spirit,'  etc.,  and  should  irritate  everyone  as 
effectually  as  my  preface  to  '  Samarkand.5 


5  55 


The  letter  quoted  above  was  sent  to  the 
firm,  but  the  envelope  contained  also  a 
letter  addressed  to  myself,  giving  more 
details  about  his  project  of  translating  the 
6th  iEneid. 
104 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

"  Confidential. 

Hotel  Stephani, 

MoNTANA-SUR-SlERRE, 

Switzerland. 

Sunday. 

MY    DEAR    GOLDRING, 

This  accompanies  a  somewhat  start- 
ling announcement  to  Messrs.  Max  G.  that  I 
want  them  to  publish  the  6th  iEneid  of 
Virgil  translated  by  me  into  blank  verse. 
Seriously  the  translation,  of  which  200  lines 
out  of  900  are  ready,  will  be  so  striking  and 
the  prefaces  so  combative  that  I  think 
produced  in  the  way  I  suggest  it  may  bring 
in  quite  good  money.  Other  books  of  the 
iEneid  may  follow— but  I  can't  pledge 
myself. 

Suppose  500  arc  sold  at  7/6.    Take  75  off 

for  review.     Call  it  £200  for  the  firm  after 

the   Bookseller's   profits.     Production   even 

in   fine   style,    with   advertisements,   £60   at 

H  105 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

most.  A  tenner  for  the  author  and  £130 
for  the  publisher  and  there  you  are. 

Many  thanks  for  your  letter.  I'm  glad 
you  like  the  corrections  to  the  novel.  It 
was  very  fair-minded  of  Goschens  to  give  me 
the  increased  royalty. 

Would  you  tell  me  what  you  think  of  this  : 
A  publisher — friend  of  mine— writes  me  (as 
I  told  Goschen)  will  I  write  a  book  '  The 
Future  of  Poetry '  (2/6  book).  Offers  me  £25 
down  in  advance  of  10%  royalty. 

Do  people  ever  accept  contracts  like  these, 
my  dear  Goldring,  unless  they're  starving  ? 
I  would  rather  like  to  do  the  book  and  I 
might  get  chapters  of  it  into  Reviews.  But 
3  months'  work  for  £25  ?  To  a  dramatic 
author  whose  work  Tree  is  considering  with 
enthusiasm —but  there's  many  a  slip,  etc.— 
it  don't  seem  brilliant  and  I  haven't  yet 
closed.  Of  course  its  damned  unlikely  such 
a  book  would  sell  more  than  2000  and  that 
I  should  ever  get  more  royalty.  And  if  it 
106 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

sold    ten    thousand    I    should    net    the    not 
enormous  sum  of  £100. 

Please  keep  the  above  confidential.  As  I 
have  to  rely  upon  my  pen  now  I  shall  have 
to  be  a  bit  snarky  about  contracts.  I  must 
have  at  least  the  chance  of  making  good 
money.  I  think  I  have  enough  followers 
to  be  able  to  sell  the  Virgil  at  a  stiff  price 
and  with  a  stiff  profit,  but  I  shall  want  a 
good  fat  share  in  the  latter. 

If  Goschens  don't  want  it  I  shall  try  the 
Riccardi  Press  and  issue  it  at  about  eleven 
guineas  ! 

There  is  perpetual  sunshine  here  and 
perpetual  leisure.  Otherwise  there's  no  par- 
ticular reason  for  my  continued  existence. 
I  get  neither  better  nor  worse  and  wait  all 
day  for  news  of  '  Hassan.' 

Ever  yours — with  many  thanks  for  many 
troubles  undertaken  on  my  behalf. 

James  Elroy  Flecker." 


107 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

As  the  discerning  reader  will  easily  gather 
from  this  letter,  Flecker  really  had  no  com- 
mercial or  money-grubbing  instinct  what- 
ever. His  attempts  to  be  businesslike  and 
"  snarky  "  were  a  delightful  tour  de  force, 
and  they  probably  did  not  deceive  himself. 
As  everyone  who  knows  anything  about 
the  hard  facts  of  book  production  will  be 
aware,  the  offer  of  an  advance  of  £25  for  a 
half-crown  volume  on  a  theme  unlikely  to 
attract  a  big  public,  was  far  from  being 
ungenerous ;  while  the  poet's  estimate  of 
the  publisher's  probable  profit  from  the  sale 
of  425  copies  of  his  translation  of  the 
Vlth  JEneid  at  7/6  can  only  be  described 
as  a  "  rich  bit  of  fun." 

In  another  undated  letter,  written  about 
this  period,  from  Montana,  Flecker  describes 
one  more  projected  book,  some  notes  for 
which  may  have  been  found  among  his 
papers. 
108 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

"  My  dear  Goldring, 

1.  Messrs. have    sent    me 

the  enclosed.  Will  you  tell  me  what  to 
reply  ?  As  far  as  I  read  my  contract  the 
Foreign  rights  are  not  available.     What  do 

they  mean  though translation,  America, 

or  Tauchnitz  ?  Are  they  any  damned  use, 
anyhow.  If  the  '  K.  of  A.'  begins  to  move,  I'd 
like  to  get  it  hitched  on  to  Tauchnitz. 

Please  return  the  letter  and  answer  if 
possible  by  return. 

2.  I  have,  it  is  true,  a  vague  scheme 
for  a  book.  I  have  quaint  ideas  on 
most  things — literature,  of  course,  but  also 
current  politics — and  a  million  other  things. 
I  find  that  exile  makes  it  useless  trying  to 
work  these  ideas  up  into  articles,  and  also 
that  if  I  do  turn  them  into  articles  all  my 
dear  ideas  become  heavy  and  dull.  I  don't, 
for  instance,  a  bit  want  to  write  a  long 
review  on  II.  G.  Wells.     But  I  do  want  to 

109 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

say  and  state  my  opinion  for  posterity  that 
his  latest  work  is  pompous  drivel,  and  that 
Mr.  Polly  is  one  of  the  best  things  ever 
written  in  any  language. 

I  might  call  the  book  i  Poet's  Porridge,' 
and  should  write  it  very  quickly.  Under 
headings  :  Literature,  Politics,  etc.,  it  would 
consist  of  little  brief  paragraphs  of  rather 
pithy  comment.  You  may  not  know  that 
I  am  a  violent  phil-Hellene  :  that  will  come 
in  also.  (I  am  writing  a  magnificent  corona- 
tion ode  for  King  Constantine.) 

Just  mention  the  idea  to  Goschens,  will 
you  ?  Then  if  they'd  like  to  see  a  bit,  I'll 
scrape  together  a  few  pages  and  send  them 
as  a  specimen.  There  is  something  novel 
about  a  poet  damning  round  on  current 
events  :  only,  of  course,  I  ought  to  be  better 
known  than  I  am  to  get  a  hearing." 

Flecker,  despite  much  illness,  seems  to 
have  been  fairly  active  during  his  stay  in 
110 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

Montana.  I  had  another  very  long  and 
complicated  business  letter  from  him,  sent 
from  the  Hotel  Stephani,  chiefly  about  the 
cost  of  the  corrections  to  "  The  King  of 
Alsander."  I  am  very  glad  to  gather  from 
it  that  the  firm  let  him  off  lightly  and  raised 
his  royalties.  At  the  end  of  this  letter  he 
refers  to  an  "  excellent  and  sensible  article, 
by  a  lady  called  Hodgson,  on  '  Samarkand ' 
in  December  Gentlewoman  with  which  I  was 
very  pleased." 

What  I  take  to  be  the  last  communication 
which  I  had  from  Flecker  from  Montana  is 
undated  like  the  others,  but  was  evidently 
sent  soon  after  the  publication  of  "  The  King 
of  Alsander." 

"  My  dear  Goldring, 

The  advertisements  are  excellent.  I 
hope  the  book  will  '  move  '  :  there  is  time 
yet. 

I    suggest    (tho'    no    one    ever    yet    took 

111 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

note  of  my  advertising  suggestions)  that  The 
Times'  review,  which  wasn't  a  review  but 
a  remarkably  clever  synopsis,  should  be 
printed  in  full  on  the  front  page  of  the  cap, 
if  it  can  be  done  inexpensively. 

You  know  my  play  '  Hassan '  is  going 
to  be  played  in  London  this  autumn  if  all 
goes  well :  I've  got  an  excellent  collabor- 
ator. Goschens  shall  print  it  — but  only  after 
it's  played  and  that's  a  long  way  off  yet. 

Otherwise  I  try  to  revise  another  older 
play  of  mine  and  when  not  sufficiently 
inspired  for  that  I  do  the  Virgil,  which 
Gilbert  Murray  has  pronounced  to  be  the 
best  translation  of  him  in  English. 

I  can't  work  much,  and  haven't  at  present 
any  original  ideas  in  my  head.  I'm  only 
just  now  managing  to  get  up  to  lunch  after 
3  months'  illness.  Hope  to  go  to  Locarno 
soon — will  send  you  address  if  I  move.  As 
for  poems  I've  only  written  4  since  '  Samar- 
kand '  and  they  be  small  ones.  Clement 
112 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

Shorter  offered  me  three  guineas,  and  I've 
only  been  able  to  send  one,  whereas  he  asked 
for  two. 

Re  'King  of  Alsander'  Dramatic  Rights. 
I  know  that  signature  of  J.  N.  Raphael 
under  many  an  inadequate  verse  translation 
from  the  French  and  some  fairly  adequate 
Paris  gossip.  Of  course  make  a  bargain  for 
the  stage  rights.  ...  I  will  write  formally 
on  this  subject  if  you  like.  But  I  would  like 
to  work  the  play  in  collaboration  with  J.  N.  R. 
if  possible  —a  collaboration  in  which  I  should 
take  the  minor  part. 

I  owe  you  many  thanks  for  having  intro- 
duced me  to  Goschens.  They  are  certainly 
advertising  excellently.  I  shall  be  not  only 
disappointed  but  astonished  if  the  '  K.  of 
A.'  don't  move.  The  Evening  Standard 
review  and  Globe  are  better  quoting  than 
The  Times.  The  Westminster  review  is  a 
mad  muddle— it  seems  to  think  I'm  a  plot. 
How  reviewers  love  prefaces  —it's  astonishing. 

113 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

If  the  Virgil  can't  be  published  by  Oxford 
Press  or  Riccardi,  I  may  get  Goschens  to 
print  a  few  copies,  partly  at  my  expense, 
paper  bound  and  no  advertising.  Perhaps 
if  I  got  G.  Murray  to  write  a  preface  they 
would  even  be  pleased  to  do  it.  But  I  prefer 
to  publish  it  in  the  august  quietude  of 
Oxford  if  possible. 

That  Poetry  and  Drama  do  irritate  me 
(I  don't  refer  to  your  excellent  review)  with 
its  childish  anti-God  rubbish  (we're  about 
200  years  ahead  of  these  asses,  on  the 
Continent,  in  the  middle  of  a  Catholic 
reaction,  and  we  leave  that  sort  of  vulgarity 
to  the  plebs)  and  its  ridiculous  abuse  of 
Tennyson  and  other  Victorians.  Do  they 
really  imagine writes  as  well  as  Tenny- 
son or  Kipling  ?     It's  astonishing.     Do  write 

again.      Do    you   ever   see   D ?      If  so 

remember  me  to  her  fondly. 
Yours, 

James  Elroy  Flecker." 
114 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

Flecker  went  on  to  Locarno  in  the  spring 
of  1914,  and  I  have  only  been  able  to  dis- 
cover one  postcard  sent  from  there  though 
he  must  have  written  several  times.  The 
address  on  the  card  is  "  Pension  Rhcin- 
gold,  8  via  dei  Fiori,  Locarno "  and  the 
date  on  the  postmark  is  18th  April, 
1914. 

"  I  am  asked  tentatively  what  I'll  take 
for  the  rights  of  having  '  Alsander  '  trans- 
lated into  German.  £15  or  £20  suggested,  of 
which  I  suppose  Messrs.  Goschen  take  half. 
Shall  I  close  if  offered  £15  ?  Don't  think  I'll 
get  more  (Langen's,  Munich).  Can't  it  get 
on  to  Tauchnitz  ? 

Please     send     copy     of     '  Alsander '     to 

for  review,  also  copies  of  '  Alsander  ' 

and  '  Samarkand  '  to .    He  is  a  worthy 

fellow  who  offers  to  puff  me  inimitably  in 
America  :  he  offers  to  pay  for  the  books  — 
but  I  hope  you  can  send  him  a  free  copy 
as   he  is  full   of  youthful   enthusiasms  and 

115 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

promises  to  review  the  book  in  some  rag  or 
other." 

To  judge  from  the  following  extract  from  a 
letter  to  Mr.  Donald  Robertson,  the  change 
to  Locarno  made  the  poet  more  cheerful 
even  if  it  did  him  no  good. 

"8.  IV.  14. 

My  dear  Donald, 

What  a  pest !  Are  you  going  to  make 
me  regret  having  quitted  the  fir  trees,  snows, 
and  thaws  of  that  infernal  Montana  ? 

And  exactly  2  days  ago,  having  procured 
from  Gomrae  an  address  of  yours  in  S. 
Remo,  I  wrote  to  you  there  begging  you 
to  try  and  return  by  the  Gothard  and 
see  me. 

But  look  here.  Make  a  sporting  effort. 
Come  and  see  me  all  the  same  !  It's  a  long 
journey  because  the  steamer  from  Stresa 
here  (you  ought  to  go  to  Stresa  to  see  the 
Borromean  islands  unless  you  know  them  : 
116 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

otherwise  Baveno  is  a  few  minutes  nearer) 
is  slow  (4  hours),  but  the  trip  is  a  very  jolly 
one.  .  .  ." 


In  May  he  moved  to  Davos  Platz — for 
Flecker,  as  for  so  many  other  invalids,  the 
final  resting-place  before  the  end.  The  last 
three  of  the  letters  or  postcards  which  I 
was  able  to  retrieve  from  my  files  were  sent 
from  Davos.  The  first  of  these,  a  card,  is 
dated  June  1. 

"  My  dear  Goldring, 

1.  Please  send  a  copy  of  'The  Golden 
Journey '  to at  my  expense. 

2.  Do  send  me  any  news  there  is  going. 

3.  No,  my  dear  fellow,  don't  ask  me  if  I 
can  write  a  book  about  Greece — descriptive 
tour.  I  can  only  preserve  the  rotten  rem- 
nants of  my  life  by  lying  in  bed  here  for 
years— in  the  ugliest  hole  God  ever  created. 

4.  But  I  do  intend  to  publish  my  great 

117 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

ode  to  Greece  separately  with  a  forty-page 
preface  of  a  most  violent  kind,  full  of  abuse 
and  invective  of  pro-Turks,  pro-Bulgars,  the 
Liberal  Press,  with  history  of  the  Eastern 
question.  I  should  much  value  an  assurance 
that  Goschens  would  take  this  ;  it  might 
create  a  bit  of  a  stir. 

5.  I'm  still  waiting  to  hear  from  Oxford 
about  my  '  Virgil,'  and  haven't  done  a 
line  more  to  it,  or,  indeed,  to  anything 
for  months.  I  need  encouragement.  Tell 
Goschens  I  want  to  write  a  play  on  Judith, 
and  I  ought  to  revise  my  '  Don  Juan,'  and 
I've  got  to  work  '  Hassan  '  with  my  collabo- 
rator. And  day  after  day  I  do  nothing.  I 
must  try  for  that  photo :  The  Sphere  wants 
one  too,  and  a  poem  ! 

Ever  yours, 

James  Elroy  Flecker. 

I'd  give  all  my  poems  to  be  a  healthy 
navvy. 
118 


?5 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

The  next  one  probably  arrived  about  a 
fortnight  later. 

"  Hotel  Buol  :  Davos  Platz, 

Switz. 
Dear  Goldring, 

1.  I  enclose  photo.  Will  send  12 
more  as  soon  as  ready.  Please  dispose  to 
most  important  customers. 

2.  I  enclose  biographical  details.  As  I 
have  no  notion  how  these  should  be  got  up, 
will  you  please  be  so  kind  as  to  work  'em 
up  for  me  and  have  a  few  copies  typed  to 
send  to  enquirers.  One  can't  do  these 
things  oneself  :   it's  so  grotesque. 

3.  Would  you  let  me  know  if  the  offer 
of  Goschens'  of  £10  in  advance  for  the 
'  Virgil '  is  definite  :  as  I  want  to  know. 
The  Oxford  Press  would  take  it. 

4.  Please  send  me  any  money  you  can. 

5.  Please  see  about  an  American  press 
agency  for  me. 

119 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

I'm  so  damned  ill  I'm  almost  in  despair. 
Sorry  I  wrote  a  crusty  letter  last  time. 
Seems  I've  lost  the  Polignac  prize,  damn  it. 
Murray  &  Yeats  voted  for  me.  Damn 
everything." 

As  far  as  I  can  recall,  all  Flecker's  pro- 
jects for  books  were  welcomed  by  me  on 
behalf  of  my  firm,  though  not  a  page  of 
MS.  ever  reached  us  of  any  of  them.  In 
regard  to  the  translation  of  '  Virgil '  I  felt 
bound  to  urge  him,  in  his  own  interests, 
to  let  the  Oxford  Press  issue  it,  if  they 
would.  At  this  period,  although  it  was 
within  a  few  months  of  his  death,  I  had 
no  idea  that  he  was  in  any  imminent 
danger  or  that  a  complete  recovery  was 
impossible. 

The  last  letter  I  can  find  from  him  is 
dated  October  12th,  1914. 


120 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

"Maison  Baratelli, 

Davos  Platz. 
My  dear  Goldring, 

I  should  much  like  to  hear  from  you  — 
but  perhaps  you're  at  the  war.  Wish  I 
were  !  We've  got  a  flat  and  I  amuse  myself 
by  lying  in  bed  all  day.  I  can  write  only 
a  very  little  in  the  morning.  Have  pupped 
a  war  poem  and  some  prose.  Could  we  send 
a  dozen  of  our  novels  to  the  Navy  :  the 
officers,  it  seems,  have  only  too  much  time 
for  reading  !  And  they  must  weary  of  the 
Strands  and  illustrateds  people  send  them. 
If  my  War  poem  gets  published  by  The 
Times  (80  lines  blank  verse)  we  might  make 
a  Broadsheet  of  it.  Unlikely,  however, 
that  Times  will  be  up  to  scratch.  Do  give 
me  news  :  post  is  quite  safe  :  about  7  days. 
Let's  have  news  of  you.  Why  don't  you 
send  me  your  novel  ? 


55 


He  died  on  January  3rd,  1915. 
I  121 


B 


V 


Y  the  way,  who  is  Flecker  ?     Is  he 
any  good  ?  " 

It  was  Ezra  Pound,  I  remember, 
who  asked  me  this  question,  in  all  good 
faith,  some  time  after  the  publication  of 
"  The  Golden  Journey  to  Samarkand."  The 
question  impressed  me  because  it  seemed  to 
emphasise  one  of  Flecker's  most  valuable 
qualities  :  he  was  never  fashionable,  never 
joined  any  mutual  admiration  society,  and 
never  depended,  for  inspiration,  upon  the 
reactions  of  any  gang  or  clique.  He  met 
very  few  of  his  brother-poets.  After  his 
Oxford  days  he  could  never  be  said  to  have 
belonged  to  any  particular  set ;  and  though 
he  was,  with  some  notable  exceptions,  gener- 
ously treated  by  reviewers  (despite  his  stric- 

125 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

tures  upon  them),  he  was  never  boomed  by 
any  one  circle  of  critics.  I  don't  suppose 
that  he  even  knew  the  names  of  any  of  the 
critics  who  noticed  his  books  in  the  principal 
London  papers.  The  literary  people  who 
admired  him  were  scattered,  widely  diver- 
gent types,  mostly  unknown  to  one  another. 
As  a  poet  he  stood  upon  his  own  feet.  He 
followed  his  own  path,  looking  neither  to 
the  right  nor  to  the  left,  and  as  soon  as  he 
had  "found  himself"  he  was  apparently 
but  little  influenced  by  any  of  his  contem- 
poraries. Flecker,  at  a  very  early  age,  must 
have  been  perfectly  conscious  that  he  was 
a  poet ;  and,  having  a  passion  for  the 
art  of  poetry  for  its  own  sake,  he  set  to 
work  to  make  himself  as  fine  a  poet  as  it 
was  within  his  nature  and  capacity  to 
become.  Allied  with  his  extraordinary 
facility  went  an  equally  extraordinary  power 
of  restraint  and  of  self-criticism ;  and  he 
knew  all  about  the  value  of  taking  pains. 
126 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

In  his  school  days  and  at  Oxford,  his  out- 
put of  verse  was  enormous.     He  imitated 
all  his  favourite  poets  fluently  and  easily, 
and  probably  with  a  fairly  clear  notion  in 
his  head  that  these  outpourings  were  metri- 
cal   exercises    and    nothing    more.      As    a 
corrective  to  his  gush  of  experiment — the 
first  delighted  leaps  from  the  earth  of  one 
who  4s  determined  at  last  to  fly— he  early 
acquired  the  habit  of  making  translations, 
and  there  is  no  doubt  that  the  labour  and 
concentration    involved    in    them    were    of 
immense  help  to  him  throughout  his  life, 
while  the  translations  themselves,  at  their 
best,    now    form    by    no    means    the    most 
negligible  part  of  his  "  Collected  Poems." 

Flecker' s  career  as  a  poet  is  one  of  un- 
broken progress  up  to  and  including  "  The 
Golden  Journey  to  Samarkand."  And  if 
some  of  the  work  which  followed  the  publica- 
tion of  this  volume  seems  to  show  a  falling 
off,  it  must  be  ascribed  less  to  any  diminu- 

127 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

tion  of  his  capacities  or  inspiration  than  to 
the  ravages  of  the  disease  from  which  he 
died.  Even  so,  four  poems  at  least,  written 
after  the  publication  of  the  "  Golden 
Journey  "  — "  Stillness,"  "  The  Pensive 
Prisoner,"  "The  Old  War-ship  Ablaze," 
and  "The  Old  Ships" — are  equal  to  any- 
thing he  ever  did.  If  the  "  Collected 
Poems  "  has  its  dull  pages,  it  must  always 
be  borne  in  mind  that  it  contains  much  the 
publication  or  re-publication  of  which  the 
poet  himself  never  authorised.  The  "  Juven- 
ilia "  are,  on  the  whole,  of  little  interest 
except  for  the  second  Glion  poem,  "  Glion- 
Evening," — where  we  have  an  early  indica- 
tion of  his  love  of  precision,  of  the  clear  image 
and  the  vivid  picture  as  opposed  to  a  lazy, 
emotional  vagueness. 

From  Glion  when  the  sun  declines 
The  world  below  is  clear  to  see  : 
I  count  the  escalading  pines 
Upon  the  rocks  of  Meillerie. 
128 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

Like  a  dull  bee  the  steamer  plies 
And  settles  on  the  jutting  pier  : 

The  barques,  strange  sailing  butterflies, 
Round  idle  headlands  idly  veer. 

These  two  stanzas  achieve  with  success 
the  effect  aimed  at,  and  the  more  closely 
they  are  examined  the  better  the  workman- 
ship appears.  The  two  remaining  stanzas 
of  the  poem  are  not  quite  up  to  the  same 
level.  "  Glion-Evening "  is  dated  July, 
1904,  and  was  thus  written  before  the  poet 
was  twenty. 

It  was  towards  the  end  of  his  time  at 
Oxford  that  Flecker's  real  personality  first 
began  to  show  itself  in  his  work.  In  the 
first  stanza  of  "  A  New  Year's  Carol," 
Flecker  sings  unmistakably  with  his  own 
voice  : 

Awake,  awake  !    The  world  is  young 
For  all  its  weary  years  of  thought  : 
The  starkest  fights  must  still  be  fought, 
The  most  surprising  songs  be  sung. 

And  to  get  any  real  insight  into  the  poet's 

129 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

nature  it  must  also  be  realised  that  the 
poem  "  Envoy  "  is  equally  authentic,  equally 
revealing  : 

The  young  men  leap,  and  toss  their  golden  hair, 
Run  round  the  land,  or  sail  across  the  seas  : 
But  one  was  stricken  with  a  sore  disease, — 
The  lean  and  swarthy  poet  of  despair. 

Know  me,  the  slave  of  fear  and  death  and  shame, 
A  sad  Comedian,  a  most  tragic  Fool, 
Shallow,  imperfect,  fashioned  without  rule, 
The  doubtful  shadow  of  a  demon  flame. 

His  dejections  were  inevitably  the  counter- 
part of  his  enthusiasms,  and  could  safely 
be  deduced  from  them,  even  if  he  had  never 
given  them  poetic  expression. 

Flecker's  first  volume  of  verse,  "  The 
Bridge  of  Fire,"  issued  by  Mr.  Elkin  Mathews 
in  his  "  Vigo  Cabinet  Series  "  in  1907,  though 
it  contains  a  good  many  pieces  that  the 
poet  himself  afterwards  suppressed  or  re- 
wrote, bears  at  the  same  time  very  vividly 
the  impress  of  his  personality  and  has  in  it 
the  promise,  at  least,  of  what  he  was  to 
130 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

become.  We  can  see,  as  in  "  From  Gren- 
oble "  and  "  Riouperoux,"  his  love  for 
places  and  for  place-names  already  inspiring 
him  ;  and  he  is  high-spirited  even  when  he 
is  being  "  decadent,"  and  serving  us  "  Kubla 
Khan  "  with  a  dash  of  absinthe — as  in  the 
two  sonnets  of  Bathrolaire.  These  two 
sonnets  must  have  given  him  enormous 
pleasure  to  write,  and  his  voice,  for  those 
who  remember  it,  is  audible  in  every  line. 
They  are  humorous,  imaginative,  and  ex- 
tremely adroit,  and  it  seems  to  me  (biassed 
as  I  may  be  by  a  certain  sentimentality) 
that  the  years  have  treated  them  more 
kindly  than  some  of  the  other  poems  of 
this  period.  "  The  Ballad  of  Hampstead 
Heath '  is  an  example  of  undergraduate 
humour —brilliant  overnight,  but  rather  flat 
the  next  morning  —  and  only  useful  in  its 
place  in  the  "  Collected  Poems  "  as  a  con- 
trast to  the  careful  workmanship  surround- 
ing it. 

131 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

The  faults  of  taste,  occasional  cheapness, 
and  mere  "  cleverness,"  which  can  be  found 
in  "  The  Bridge  of  Fire  "  (mingled  though 
they  are  with  a  youthful  freshness  and  elan), 
have  also  their  interest,  in  that  they  show 
us,  by  contrast,  how  steadily  Flecker's  work 
improved  as  he  grew  older.  In  "  The  Golden 
Journey  to  Samarkand  "  period  he  would 
not  have  been  capable  of  such  a  poem  as 
"  Mary  Magdalen."  And  his  later  version 
of  "  Tenebris  interlucentem  "  is  an  enormous 
improvement  on  the  one  contained  in  his 
first  printed  volume.  Not  all  his  alterations 
and  revisions  were  as  successful  as  this.  In 
the  little  poem  called  "  We  that  were 
Friends "  he  made  a  change  in  the  first 
verse  without  improving  it,  while  leaving 
in  the  second  the  unfortunate  line  "  whom 
dreams  delight  and  passions  please"  (What- 
ever passions  may  do,  it  is  difficult  to  think 
of  them  as  "pleasing"  anybody — except 
perhaps  a  fish,  to  whom  a  passion  might  be 
132 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

a  "  pleasing  "  surprise.)  And  his  blue  pencil 
has  failed  to  delete  the  epithet  "  great  "  in 
the  penultimate  line,  an  epithet  which  is, 
to  say  the  least,  unhappy.  Another  altera- 
tion which  some  of  those  who  possess  "  The 
Bridge  of  Fire  "  will  regret  occurs  in  the 
last  verse  of  "  The  Ballad  of  the  Student  in 
the  South."  The  first  line  of  this  verse 
originally  ran  :  "  We're  of  the  people,  you 
and  I."  In  the  version  contained  in  the 
"  Collected  Poems  "  this  has  been  changed 
to  "For  we  are  simple,  you  and  I" — a 
much  weaker,  because  more  '  literary," 
way  of  saying  the  same  thing. 

In  neither  "  The  Bridge  of  Fire  "  nor  in  the 
much  more  mature  "  Forty-Two  Poems ' 
can  Flecker  be  said  quite  to  have  found  him- 
self. Up  to  1910  he  still  wanted,  for  some 
unknown  reason,  to  write  poems  about 
London,  and  he  retained  enough  affection 
for  his  failures  in  this  direction  to  print  two 

of  the  worst.    "  The  Ballad  of  the  Londoner  ' 

133 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

does  not  come  off,  while  "  The  Ballad  of 
Camden  Town "  is  perhaps  the  only  one 
of  Flecker's  pieces  in  which,  by  wallowing 
solemnly  in  false  sentiment,  he  becomes 
unconsciously  funny.  In  the  poems  of 
this  first  period— with  the  splendid  excep- 
tions of  the  "Ballad  of  Iskander,"  of 
"  Pillage  "  and  of  "  The  War  Song  of  the 
Saracens"— it  is  when  he  is  most  subjec- 
tive, when  his  poems  are  most  intimate 
and  deeply  felt,  that  he  is  most  successful. 
As  examples,  one  may  quote  "  The  Senti- 
mentalist," "No  Coward's  Song,"  "To  a 
Poet  a  Thousand  Years  Hence,"  and  the 
beautiful  "  Dulce  Lumen,  Triste  Numen, 
Suave  Lumen  Luminum."  The  first-men- 
tioned of  these  poems  shows— what  is  also 
apparent  elsewhere  in  his  work — that 
Flecker  understood  the  romantic  side  of 
friendship  as  only  very  few  English  poets 
have  understood  it. 

It    was    not   until   Flecker   went   to   the 
134 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

East,  and  found  in  travel  in  Turkey,  Asia 
Minor,  Greece,  and  among  the  islands  of 
the  iEgean  the  greatest  inspiration  of  his 
life,  that  he  really  came  into  his  own.  "  The 
Golden  Journey  to  Samarkand  "  is  the  book 
of  his  maturity  in  which  all  his  finest  poetic 
qualities  are  displayed.  In  technique  it 
marks  a  notable  advance.  By  this  time 
he  had  formed,  or  rather  adopted,  a  definite 
theory  of  poetry,  and  it  was  a  theory  from 
the  application  of  which,  at  that  stage  of 
his  development,  he  gained  a  great  deal. 
That,  had  he  lived  through  the  war,  the 
theory  would  have  been  cast  aside,  there 
are,  at  least,  indications.  But  speculations 
of  this  sort  are  fruitless,  and  it  is  the  work 
which  he  actually  accomplished  which  alone 
concerns  us.  Not  only  is  Flecker's  own 
assertion,  made  in  a  letter  which  I  have 
quoted,  that  the  Oriental  poems  in  "  The 
Golden  Journey  to  Samarkand "  are 
"unique  in  English,"  fully  justified,  but  it 

135 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

can,  I  think,  be  stated  that  few  poems  in 
our  literature  show  a  more  passionate  love 
of  England  than  "  Brumana,"  a  poem,  if 
ever  there  was  one,  wrung  from  the  heart  by 
the  agony  of  exile.  I  quote  the  opening 
verse  : 

Oh  shall  I  never  never  be  home  again  ? 

Meadows  of  England  shining  in  the  rain 

Spread   wide   your   daisied   lawns :    your  ramparts 

green 
With  briar  fortify,  with  blossom  screen 
Till  my  far  morning — and  O  streams  that  slow 
And  pure  and  deep  through  plains  and  playlands  go, 
For  me  your  love  and  all  your  kingcups  store, 
And — dark  militia  of  the  southern  shore, 
Old  fragrant  friends — preserve  me  the  last  lines 
Of  that  long  saga  which  you  sung  me,  pines, 
When,  lonely  boy,  beneath  the  chosen  tree 
I  listened,  with  my  eyes  upon  the  sea. 

By  nature,  I  do  not  think  that  Flecker 
ever  had  any  tendency  to  be  didactic ;  but 
he  very  likely  had  a  strong  inclination  to  be 
sentimental  and  subjective,  an  inclination 
which  he  deliberately  restrained  and  of 
which  he  was  himself  rather  afraid.  The 
136 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

repression  which  he  exercised  in  this  respect 
has  earned  for  his  poetry  a  reputation  for 
frigidity  which  is,  on  the  whole,  undeserved. 
He  probably  adopted  his  Parnassian  theory, 
in  the  first  instance,  as  a  discipline  and  a 
corrective.  He  knew  that  both  his  '  feel- 
ings "  and  his  verbal  exuberance  needed 
pruning  and  canalising :  and  the  Par- 
nassians offered  him  precisely  what  he 
required. 

"  A  careful  study  of  this  theory "  (the 
Parnassian  theory),  he  says,  in  his  preface 
to  "  The  Golden  Journey  to  Samarkand," 
"  however  old-fashioned  it  may  by  now 
have  become  in  France,  would,  I  am  con- 
vinced, benefit  English  critics  and  poets, 
for  both  our  poetic  criticism  and  our  poetry 
are  in  chaos.  It  is  a  Latin  theory,  and 
therefore  the  more  likely  to  supply  the 
defects  of  the  Saxon  genius.  .  .  .  The  Par- 
nassian school,"  he  continues,  "  was  a 
classical  reaction  against  the  perfervid 
k  137 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

sentimentality  and  extravagance  of  some 
French  romantics.  The  Romantics  in  France, 
as  in  England,  had  done  their  powerful 
work,  and  infinitely  widened  the  scope  and 
enriched  the  language  of  poetry.  It  re- 
mained for  the  Parnassians  to  raise  the 
technique  of  their  art  to  a  height  which 
should  enable  them  to  express  the  subtlest 
ideas  in  powerful  and  simple  verse.  .  .  . 
The  French  Parnassian  has  a  tendency  to 
use  traditional  forms,  and  even  to  employ 
classical  subjects.  His  desire  in  writing 
poetry  is  to  create  beauty  :  his  inclination 
is  toward  a  beauty  somewhat  statuesque. 
He  is  apt  to  be  dramatic  and  objective 
rather  than  intimate.  The  enemies  of  the 
Parnassians  have  accused  them  of  cultivating 
unemotional  frigidity  and  upholding  an  aus- 
tere view  of  perfection.  The  unanswerable 
answers  to  all  criticism  are  the  works  of 
Heredia,  Leconte  de  Lisle,  Samain,  Henri 
de  Regnier,  and  Jean  Moreas.  . 
138 


55 


^U^-o    (3i-v-u.    Lli-c.    Iw  Iwt.'vo-co    -Axe 

9     t4s->4~L*^-^U~nr-^li«~x*o        Sy^*^-    *~*-C-^'      i^£~*j      S/^ri~£J 

Corrections  to  "Oak  and  Olive,"  in  Flecker's  Handwriting. 


Fucin 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

These  passages  are  not  only  interesting 
in  themselves,  but  they  illuminate  the  poet's 
attitude  towards  his  own  work,  and  enable 
us  to  guess  that  he  had  as  shrewd  a  notion 
as  anyone  could  have  of  his  own  gifts  and 
weaknesses.  Indeed,  it  may  be  said  that 
part  of  Flecker's  genius  lay  in  his  realisation 
of  his  capacities.  He  knew  what  he  could 
do,  and  we  rarely  find  him  groping  after 
things  which  are  too  high  for  him.  I  think 
it  can  nowhere  be  said  of  him  that  he 
"  wrought  better  than  he  knew  "  ;  and  to 
judge  from  his  love  of  revision  and  of 
emendation  he  seems  to  have  had  an 
almost  exaggerated  distrust  of  what  Mr. 
Arthur  Symons  has  somewhere  called 
'  the  plenary  inspiration  of  first  thoughts." 
His  hatred  of  sloppy  writing,  "  native  wood 
notes,"  and  temperamental  gush  had  its 
counterpart  in  his  devotion  to  the  Classics, 
and  his  resulting  desire  to  create,  in  his 
poetry,  a     '  beauty  somewhat   statuesque," 

139 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

marmoreal,  indestructible.  Greek  names 
thrilled  him  all  his  life,  and  one  can  imagine 
that  nothing  gave  him  greater  delight  than 
to  fit  such  names  as  Hylas,  Aeolus,  Orei- 
thyia,  into  a  setting  of  verse.  But  easily 
traceable  as  is  his  love  of  Greek  and  Roman 
poetry  throughout  all  his  work,  it  is  possible, 
nevertheless,  that  the  most  fruitful  literary 
influence  which  inspired  him  was  that  of 
Sir  Richard  Burton,  the  whole  of  whose 
"  Kasidah  "  he  had,  as  a  boy,  taken  the 
trouble  to  transcribe.  Perhaps  one  should 
qualify  this  by  saying  that  it  was  not  so 
much  Burton  as  the  flavour  of  Persian  and 
Arabic  poetry  conveyed  to  him  through 
Burton,  which  so  fertilised  his  mind  as  to 
make  it  possible  for  him,  in  the  fulness  of 
time,  to  give  us  "  Gates  of  Damascus," 
the  Prologue  and  Epilogue  of  "  The 
Golden  Journey  to  Samarkand "  and  his 
play,  "  Hassan."  There  is  a  rare  and 
magical  beauty  in  such  lines  as  these 
140 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

which    it    requires    no  trained   ear   to   dis- 
cover : 

I  am  the  gate  that  fears  no  fall  :    the  Mihrab  of 

Damascus  wall, 
The  bridge  of  booming  Sinai  :    the  Arch  of  Allah  all 

in  all. 

O  spiritual  pilgrim,   rise  :    the  night  has  grown  her 

single  horn  : 
The  voices  of  the  souls  unborn  are  half  adream  with 

Paradise. 

To  Meccah  thou  hast  turned  in  prayer  with  aching 

heart  and  eyes  that  burn  : 
Ah,  Hajji,  whither  wilt  thou  turn  when  thou  art  there, 

when  thou  art  there  ? 

All  through  "  Gates  of  Damascus,"  and 
in  such  poems  as  "  Saadabad,"  "Tasmin," 
and  the  "  Hammam  Name,"  we  have  the 
East,  the  real  East,  as  it  is  given  us  nowhere 
else  in  English  poetry. 

At  the  time  of  the  publication  of  "  The 

Golden    Journey    to    Samarkand,"    as    has 

been   seen,    Flecker    was    already    seriously 

ill.     Whenever  he  had  any  strength  to  do 

141 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

so,  he  wrote,  and  when  he  could  not  write 
he  lay  in  bed,  dreaming  of  the  great  poem 
which  he  would  accomplish  before  his  eyes 
closed  for  ever.  The  War  came  to  him  as 
the  great  occasion  for  which  all  his  life  he 
had  been  looking,  the  occasion  to  which 
the  poet  must  at  all  costs  rise  greatly. 
"  The  Burial  in  England "  was  his  last 
tremendous  effort.  He  fought  for  life  while 
he  was  writing  it,  fought  for  strength  to 
finish  it.  It  is  an  heroic  attempt,  and  thus 
to  his  friends  there  is  something  sacred 
about  these  lines  wrung  from  the  poet's 
brain  by  so  gigantic  an  effort  of  will.  Criti- 
cism, however,  must  care  nothing  for  senti- 
ment, and  if  one  can  put  aside  the 
circumstances  in  which  it  was  written,  one 
has  to  admit  that  the  poem  is  a  failure. 
It  strains  all  through  at  the  big  thing,  the 
big  effect,  and  never  reaches  it.  It  is 
voulu,  laboured  :  it  does  not  ring  true. 
Its  thought  has  the  ephemeral  qualities  of 
142 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

the   newspaper   leading  article   at   the   end 

of  1914— when  leading  articles  were  scarcely 

endowed    with    prophetic    insight.      Peace, 

"  angry  and  in  arms  "   is  represented,   we 

find,  by : 

The  same  laughing,  invincible,  tough  men 
Who  gave  Napoleon  Europe  like  a  loaf, 
For  slice  and  portion, — not  so  long  ago  ! 

In  cold  blood,  their  change  of  heart  seems 
unduly  rapid.  .  .  .  But  no  :  of  all  poems,  this 
one  ought  not  to  be  examined  in  cold  blood. 
It  is  the  last  noble  gesture  of  a  dying  artist, 
and  we  can  leave  it  at  that. 

If  Flecker  did  not  succeed  in  his  effort  to 
write  a  war-poem  on  the  grand  scale,  at 
least  in  two  or  three  of  the  shorter  pieces 
which  he  wrote  towards  the  end  of  his  life, 
he  reaches  his  highest  level.  The  two  poems, 
"  Stillness  "  and  "  The  Pensive  Prisoner," 
both  of  them  intimate  and  personal,  are 
among  the  most  beautiful  things  that  he 
ever  produced.     And  they  indicate,  also,  a 

143 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

tendency  to  free  himself  from  the  Parnassian 
shackles.  Here  is  the  last  stanza  of  "  Still- 
ness "  : 

Then  twittering  out  in  the  night  my  thought-birds  flee, 

I  am  emptied  of  all  my  dreams  : 
I  only  hear  Earth  turning,  only  see 

Ether's  long  bankless  streams, 
And  only  know  I  should  drown  if  you  laid  not  your 

hand  on  me. 

And  here  the  first  verse  of  "  The  Pensive 
Prisoner  "  : 

My  thoughts  came  drifting  down  the  Prison  where  I 

lay- 
Through  the  Windows  of  their  Wings  the  stars  were 

shining — 
The  wings  bore  me  away — the  russet  Wings  and  grey 
With  feathers  like  the  moon-bleached  Flowers — I  was 

a  God  reclining  : 
Beneath  me  lay  my  Body's  Chain  and  all  the  Dragons 

born  of  pain 
As  I  burned  through  the  Prison  Roof  to  walk  on  Pave- 
ment shining. 

This  is  not  the  occasion  to  attempt  to 
"  place  "  Flecker  as  a  poet.  Anything  in 
the  nature  of  a  final  judgment  upon  his 
144 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

poetry  must  be  left  to  some  professional 
critic,  unmoved  by  personal  memories  and 
aided  in  his  task  by  that  master-critic, 
Time.  My  own  ideas  about  Flecker's  work 
have  modified  in  several  respects  during 
the  seven  years  which  have  elapsed  since 
the  articles  on  which  this  book  is  based  were 
printed  in  the  now  defunct  "  Academy." 
What  I  first  regarded  as  coldness  now  seems 
to  me  to  be  better  described  as  restraint,  a 
restraint  which  the  poet  consciously  imposed 
upon  himself.  And  his  apparent  materialism, 
which  seemed  to  me  at  one  time  to  limit 
his  range,  I  have  come  to  believe  was  no 
more  than  superficial.  Flecker  for  many 
years  used  to  be  fond  of  saying  that  he  was 
an  agnostic,  and  perhaps  he  thought  it  was 
true.  But  in  the  last  period  of  his  life  he 
definitely  returned  to  Christianity.  It  is 
significant  that  his  last  present  to  his  mother 
— sent  shortly  before  his  death — was  a  copy 
of   the   New   Testament    in   the    Tauclmitz 

145 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

edition,  which  he  had  specially  bound  for 
her,  so  that  it  resembled,  exactly,  his  own 
copy.  He  was  evidently  influenced  by  the 
"  Catholic  Reaction  "  on  the  Continent  (see 
his  letter  on  page  114),  and  had  come  to 
regard  what  he  calls  "  childish  anti-God 
rubbish "  with  impatience,  as  a  kind  of 
vulgarity  liable  to  attack  the  half-fledged. 
This  point  may  appear  to  have  but  little 
direct  bearing  on  Flecker's  poetry,  but  it 
seems  to  me  essential  to  an  understanding 
of  the  man  who  wrote  it. 

As  a  poet,  it  will  be  allowed  that  Flecker's 
description  of  the  Parnassians  in  the  Preface 
to  "  The  Golden  Journey  to  Samarkand  ' 
applied  also,  in  the  main,  to  himself.  Like 
the  Parnassians  he  loathed  romantic  egoism  ; 
like  them  he  had  a  fine  sense  of  language, 
using  words  and  epithets  with  the  nicest 
scholarship  and  taste  ;  and  again,  like  them, 
he  preferred  as  a  rule  to  derive  his  inspira- 
tion from  the  classics,  from  history,  from 
146 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

mythology,  from  places  and  from  beautiful 
names,  rather  than  from  the  details  of  daily 
life  and  personal  emotions.  As  a  poet  of 
"  actualites  "  he  was  rarely  a  success  ;  and 
though  his  mind  was  often  filled  with  ideas 
of  writing  "magnificent  odes" — in  honour 
of  King  Constantine's  Coronation,  or  on 
some  similar  theme — he  was  never  able 
successfully  to  accomplish  anything  of  the 
sort.  His  revised  version  of  "  God  Save 
the  King"  is  merely  funny,  with  its  exotic 
literary  airs  and  graces — 

Till  Erin's  Island  lawn 
Echoes  the  dulcet-drawn 
Song  with  a  cry  of  Dawn — 
God  Save  the  King  ! 

—and  "The  Burial  in  England"  was  labour 

spent  in  vain.     We  need  not  regret  these 

failures,  for  the  inception  of  such  poems  — 

and  they  only  form  a  small  proportion  of  his 

work — came  evidently  from  the  head  rather 

than  from  the  heart.     Perhaps  the  poems 

147 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

were  due  (despite  his  Parnassian  theory)  to 
a  wrong  idea  of  what  constitutes  a  "  great  " 
poet— the  "great  poet"  which  he  was 
always  determined  to  become. 

It  was  hardly  ever  "  life  "  —either  in  its 
ordinariness  or  in  its  strangeness — which 
Flecker  succeeded  in  transmuting  into 
poetry.  His  work  is  an  escape  from  life,  and 
only  incidentally  an  interpretation  of  it. 
His  emotional  range  is  limited,  perhaps  de- 
liberately. His  greatest  strength  lies  in  his 
power  to  create  pictures  compact,  clear  in 
outline  and  rich  in  colour ;  and  in  the 
haunting  music  of  which  he  had  the  secret. 
"  Emaux  et  C amies  "  would  not  have  made 
a  bad  alternative  title  for  his  collected 
poems.  There  are  times  when  his  art  seems 
to  resemble  that  of  the  jeweller  and  of  the 
worker  in  precious  metals.  His  poems,  if 
they  rise  but  rarely  to  the  highest  imagina- 
tive level,  are  yet  hammered  and  worked 
till  they  attain  a  hard,  indestructible  per- 
148 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

fection.  They  have  an  impressive  solidity, 
and  it  is  difficult  to  believe  that  verse  of 
such  a  character  will  be  quickly  forgotten. 
It  depends  on  nothing  transitory  for  its 
interest ;  and  it  contains  no  message  to 
grow  stale. 

In  the  generations  to  come  we  can  imagine 
that  students  of  Literature  will  remember 
of  Flecker  that  in  an  age  of  anarchy  in  verse 
he  took  the  trouble  to  become  a  master  of 
technique  :  in  an  age  of  formlessness  he 
upheld  the  finest  traditions  of  form.  What 
was  beautiful  twenty  centuries  ago  is  beauti- 
ful still ;  and,  as  Flecker  has  told  us  himself, 
it  was  with  the  single  object  of  creating 
beauty  that  his  poems  were  written.  Who 
can  read  them  and  imagine  for  a  moment 
that  he  failed  in  his  object  ?  He  only  failed, 
as  I  have  suggested,  on  the  rare  occasions 
when  he  wrote  with  other  aims  than  this. 

It  is  hard  to  believe  that  the  glowing 
visions  which  Flecker's  poems  bring  before 

149 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

the  mind  will  prove  any  less  enchanting  to 
readers  in  the  centuries  to  come  than  they 
are  to-day,  or  that  his  lines,  "To  a  Poet  a 
Thousand  Years  Hence,"  will  fail  to  carry 
their  message  through  the  ages  to  some 
craftsman  as  conscientious  as  himself : 

0  friend  unseen,  unborn,  unknown, 
Student  of  our  sweet  English  tongue, 

Read  out  my  words  at  night,  alone  : 
I  was  a  poet,  I  was  young. 

Since  I  can  never  see  your  face, 
And  never  shake  you  by  the  hand, 

1  send  my  soul  through  time  and  space 

To  greet  you.    You  will  understand. 


150 


VI 


VI 


FLECKER' S  published  prose  works 
consist  of  an  early  fantasy  called 
"  The  Last  Generation,"  printed  by 
the  New  Age  Press  in  1908 ;  "  The 
Grecians  :  a  Dialogue  on  Education,"  issued 
by  J.  M.  Dent  and  Sons,  Ltd.  in  1910 ;  his  soli- 
tary novel,  "  The  King  of  Alsander  "  (Max 
Goschen,  1914)  ;  a  certain  number  of  stray 
papers,  essays  and  reviews  contributed  to 
periodicals,  a  selection  from  which  was  issued 
by  G.  Bell  and  Sons  in  1920,  under  the  title 
" Collected  Prose";  and  "The  Scholar's 
Italian  Book,"  an  introduction  to  the  study 
of  the  Latin  origins  of  Italian,  published  in 
1911  by  Mr.  David  Nutt.  Probably,  before 
these  lines  are  in  print,  "  Hassan,"  his  great 
Oriental  play,  will  have  appeared  through 
l  153 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

Messrs.  Heinemann.  There  exist  also,  so 
I  have  heard,  one  or  two  other  plays, 
possibly  unfinished :  and,  when  anyone 
succeeds  in  collecting  them,  there  is  a 
further  delightful  prose  volume  waiting  to 
be  made  out  of  Flecker's  letters.  As  even 
the  few  rather  business-like  specimens  which 
I  have  been  able  to  give  show  clearly  enough, 
Flecker  was  an  easy  and  engaging  corre- 
spondent, writing  frankly  from  the  heart 
without  literary  airs  and  graces,  writing, 
indeed,  precisely  as  he  talked.  His  total 
output  of  prose,  intended  for  publication, 
was  in  proportion  as  restricted  as  his  output 
of  verse  which  he  considered  worthy  of 
print.  With  the  exception  of  "  Hassan," 
which  is  in  a  class  by  itself,  the  prose  is 
primarily  interesting  as  shedding  a  light  on 
the  mental  make-up,  character  and  per- 
sonality of  the  poet.  He  is  at  his  best  when 
(as  in  his  dialogue,  "  The  Grecians  ")  his 
occasional  artificiality  of  style  and  excess 
154 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

of  polish  fit  in  with  the  general  conception 
and  serve  to  enhance  his  effects.  "  The 
Grecians,"  which  for  some  reason  has  suf- 
fered almost  complete  neglect,  is  one  of  his 
most  successful  prose  efforts.  And  to  read 
it  will  assist  more  towards  an  understanding 
of  the  man  and  of  his  poetry  than  any 
critical  commentary  or  appreciation  could 
hope  to  do.  In  it,  with  complete  sincerity, 
with  no  poses,  he  shows  us  the  holy  places 
of  his  own  mind  and  describes  in  detail  the 
things  which  have  enriched  it.  The  con- 
versation is  staged  now  at  Bologna,  now 
Pistoia,  now  Florence.  The  debate  is  be- 
tween two  schoolmasters,  Edwinson  the 
Classic  and  Hofman  the  Scientist,  and  a 
'  beautiful  youth,'  called  by  the  un- 
romantic  name  of  Harold  Smith,  who  en- 
counters them  at  Bologna.  The  youth 
listens  attentively  and  sympathetically  to 
what  the  schoolmasters  have  to  say  :    and 

then,    with    much    eloquence,    expounds    to 

155 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

them  his  ideas  on  the  subject  of  education. 
Finally,  at  their  request,  he  reads  them  a 
paper,  on  "  true  education,"  in  which  he 
traces  out  in  detail,  for  Edwinson's  and 
Hofman's  benefit,  a  course  of  education 
which  he  hopes  "  will  appeal  to  the  thought- 
ful as  possible,  desirable  and  sufficient." 
There  is  much  sound  and  practical  wisdom 
in  this  discourse.  Flecker  was,  as  we  have 
seen,  not  only  the  son  of  the  headmaster 
of  an  English  public  school,  but  on  several 
occasions  himself  a  schoolmaster.  The 
whole  subject  of  education  was  one  of  his 
deepest  and  most  permanent  intellectual 
interests,  and  what  he  has  to  say  in  "  The 
Grecians  "  is  the  fruit  of  long  thought  and 
considerable  experience  and  inspired  by  an 
enthusiastic  idealism.  There  are  many  pass- 
ages, particularly  those  on  school  discipline, 
punishment  and  the  treatment  of  sexual 
questions  which  it  would  be  interesting  to 
quote.  But  Flecker  is  perhaps  most  self- 
156 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

revealing  when  he  is  treating  of  the  literary 
training  which  "  Harold  Smith "  proposes 
to  give  in  his  ideal  school,  to  the  selected 
few  who  shall  be  judged  worthy  of  it. 

"  The  three  great  arts,"  says  the  '  beauti- 
ful youth,'  "  I  would  place  in  this  order  of 
educational  importance  — literature,  repre- 
sentation, music.  .  .  .  But  it  is  literature 
which  appeals  especially  to  educators  as 
being  always  a  criticism  of  life,  however 
incomplete  we  may  feel  that  definition  to 
be  :  through  reading  literature  we  enhance 
our  delight  in  life.  .  .  .  We  must,  therefore, 
give  our  boys  the  most  complete  literary 
training  possible,  not  often  worrying  them 
by  examinations  and  commentaries,  nor 
ever  dreaming  to  make  them  acquainted 
with  all  the  great  books  of  the  world  before 
the  age  of  twenty-one."  Of  adventure- 
stories  they  should  be  given  the  best  — 
Stevenson,  Kipling,  and  Conrad,  or  among 
the    minor    writers    of   romance,    Anthony 

157 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

Hope,  Maurice  Hewlett,  Gilbert  Chesterton. 
In  regard  to  poetry,  "  we  will  not  give  even 
our  youngest  boys  inferior  so-called  patriotic 
poetry  to  read,  out  of  the  false  conception 
that  such  despicable  stuff  is  specially  suit- 
able to  a  childish  understanding."  On  the 
other  hand,  "  we  will  certainly  enliven  the 
interest  of  the  young  in  verse  by  giving 
them  to  read  such  good  stories  as  '  Sohrab 
and  Rustum,'  '  Enid  and  Geraint,'  or  the 
'  White  Ship.'  "  He  has  a  good  deal  to  say 
upon  how  poetry  should  be  read  aloud. 
"...  They  shall  read  with  dignity,  slowly, 
with  realisation  of  the  beauty  of  each  word, 
and  of  how  in  verse  each  word  has  its  value, 
not  only  of  sense,  but  of  sound  and  associa- 
tion :  they  shall  pause  at  the  end  of  the 
lines  and  mark  the  metre  subtly  and  not 
grossly  :  and  all  this  may  be  taught  to  the 
wise."  He  advocates  the  teaching  of  English 
verse,  as  opposed  to  the  conventional  elegiacs 
and  iambics,  and,  says  he,  "  we  expect  our 
158 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

boys   to   write   mock   Cicero   and   Tacitus  : 

why,    in   the   name   of  common  sense,  can 

they  not  write   mock   Gibbon  or  Carlyle  ? 

Nor  do   I  think  for  a   minute  that  these 

exercises  will  hinder  any  from  forming  in 

later  years  an  original  style,  but  rather  the 

reverse  should  happen,  for  boys  so  instructed 

will   very   clearly   understand   before   they 

leave  us  that  style  is  attained  by  scrupulous 

care  and  individuality  of  expression."    The 

art  of  verse  is  to  be  very  diligently  taught 

and  the  boys  are  to  be  initiated  "  by  setting 

them  to  write  verse  translations  from  poems 

in   other   tongues.      Our   criticism    will   be 

ruthless  :    we  shall  point  out  vulgarity  of 

idea,  insufficiency  of  thought,  staleness  of 

metaphor,   harshness   of  sound.     We   shall 

not  necessarily  produce  great  poets  by  this 

training,    but    we    shall    certainly    produce 

young  men  who  love  poetry  and  (what  is 

rarer  still)  who  understand  it.     The  artist 

may  have  an  incomplete  understanding  of 

159 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

poetry ;     but   only   the   artist   can   have   a 
complete  understanding  of  it." 

The  changes  which  he  advocates  in  the 
teaching  of  Latin  and  Greek  will  be  heartily 
endorsed  by  most  English  public-schoolboys 
who  have  not  forgotten  hours  of  unprofit- 
able boredom.  "  We  shall  read  very  quickly 
in  class,  and  confine  ourselves  to  works 
which  are  either  good  in  themselves,  histori- 
cally interesting,  or  influential  on  subsequent 
thought.  We  shall  divert  the  young  with 
Homer,  easiest  of  great  poets,  with  Lucian's 
'  Vera  Historia,'  with  a  few  legends  of  old 
Rome  from  Livy,  and  with  fairy-tales  from 
Apuleius.  We  will  not  weary  even  Grecians 
with  Thucydides  when  he  talks  about  dreary 
expeditions  into  jEtolia  ;  but  all  Grecians 
shall  read  the  fate  of  the  Sicilian  expedition, 
and  learn  by  heart  the  speech  of  Pericles. 
Into  Demosthenes  we  will  only  dip ;  of 
Sophocles  and  Euripides  we  will  select  the 

finest  plays  and  read  them,  as  well  as  the 
160 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

iEschylean  trilogy,  more  than  once.  Hero- 
dotus we  shall  read  through  lightly,  as  is 
fitting,  and  we  shall  take  parts  in  the  plays 
of  Aristophanes  in  merry  congress ;  of 
Plato  we  shall  never  weary,  for  he  is  good 
for  the  soul.  Nor  shall  we  presume  to  forget 
Theocritus  and  the  lyric  fragments,  or  those 
unfading  roses  of  the  Anthology,  which 
tell  how  roses  fade.  And  only  for  the  very 
young  shall  we  Bowdlerise  anything,  since 
we  are  dealing,  not  with  urchins,  but  with 
the  select  and  chosen  few. 

"In  Latin  we  will  trouble  no  reasonable 
soul  with  Plautus  or  Terence,  or  with  more 
of  Cicero  than  is  needed  to  grasp  the  excellent 
style  of  that  second-rate  intellect.  Of  Ovid, 
too,  who  is  only  interesting  when  immoral, 
we  shall  read,  for  the  style's  sake,  some 
of  the  duller  portions.  To  the  claims  of 
those  deathless  school-books,  the  ^Eneid 
of    Virgil,   the    Odes    of    Horace,   and    the 

Satires    of   Juvenal,  we    shall    submit,  for 

161 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

their  fame  is  deserved  ;  Lucretius  and  Catul- 
lus are  too  obvious  to  mention ;  Tibullus 
is  a  sleepy  fellow  ;  and  from  Propertius  we 
shall  select.  Tacitus  tells  us  much  history, 
and  is  pleasant  to  read,  nor  are  the  letters 
of  Pliny  the  Younger  disagreeable ;  but 
Caesar  I  would  abandon  to  the  historical 
specialist,  and  Livy  I  would  read  in  haste. 
Of  Apuleius  only  one  book  is  essentially  dis- 
agreeable ;  the  rest  is  charming,  and  too 
long  neglected." 

By  reading  on  these  lines,  the  youth 
maintains  that  the  boys  will  love  the  classics 
more  and  obtain  "  a  fuller  understanding 
of  the  classical  spirit  than  those  to  whom 
Latin  and  Greek  are  a  ceaseless  drudgery 
and  evil.  I  believe,"  he  says,  "  that  they 
will  learn  no  less  than  others  have  learnt, 
from  these  time-honoured  studies,  that  calm 
and  even  fervour  of  mind,  that  sane  and 
serene  love  of  beautiful  things,  that  freedom 
from  religious  bigotry  and  extravagance 
162 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

which  marks  the  writings  of  the  Greeks, 
and  that  sense  of  arrangement  and  justice 
which  marks  the  writings  and  still  more  the 
history  of  the  Romans." 

Harold  Smith  is  equally  explicit  and 
interesting  in  his  remarks  upon  what  books 
should  be  read  and  what  classical  works 
avoided,  in  the  study  by  his  Grecians  of 
French,  German,  and  Italian.  His  observa- 
tions upon  the  Italian  language  and  upon 
Italy  may  be  taken  as  expressing  one  of  the 
strongest  of  Flecker's  enthusiasms.  I  quote 
the  passage  in  full,  because  of  the  clear  light 
it  casts  upon  Flecker's  personality. 

"  Italian  we  shall  reinvest  with  the  honour 
and  importance  which  it  has  so  unjustly  lost 
since  the  first  half  of  the  nineteenth  century. 
In  the  days  of  Peacock  no  gentleman  with 
any  pretension  of  culture  could  afford  to 
dispense  with  a  smattering  of  this  delightful 
tongue,    whose   literature   we   now   imagine 

163 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

to  be  represented  by  Dante,  Petrarch,  and 

the  4  Promessi  Sposi '  of  Manzoni.    It  is  sad 

to  think  that  there  are  now  not  a  hundred 

living  Englishmen  who  know  and  enjoy  the 

calm  and  classic  humour  of  Ariosto,  or  who 

care  anything  for  the  countless  masters  of 

early  Italian  lyrical  verse,  which  Eugenia  Levi 

has  collected  in  her  two  fascinating  volumes. 

Yet  no  classical  scholar  can  be  excused  for 

not  taking  the  trouble  to  learn  to  read  this 

easiest    of   languages,    when    a    fortnight's 

work  will  enable  him  to  read  any  average 

Italian  prose  with  fluency  and  enjoyment. 

"Our  boys  shall  know  a  great  deal  of  Dante, 

a  little  of  Petrarch,  the  two  great  collections 

of  Italian  verse  to  which  we  have  referred, 

besides  a  little  anthology  of  Carducci,  which 

extends    to    the    nineteenth    century ;     nor 

shall    they    neglect    to    read    the    splendid 

c  Barbarous     Odes '     of    Carducci    himself, 

which,  based  on  the  Horatian  metres,  form 

so    brave    a    protest    against    the    natural 
164 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

deficiency  of  a  tongue  wherein  rhymes  are 
too  easy  and  compression  too  hard.  Several 
of  the  tales  of  Boccaccio,  even  some  of 
Bandello  and  Masuccio,  claim  consideration, 
for  they  do  not  all  consist,  as  some  imagine, 
of  indecent  ribaldry,  but  are  full  of  pathos, 
humour,  and  most  cunning  psychological 
observation  ;  and  why  neglect  the  '  Corti- 
giano  '  ?  Our  playwrights  shall  be  Goldoni 
and  D'Annunzio  :  perhaps  not  the  D'An- 
nunzio  of  the  terrible  '  Citta  Morta,'  but 
certainly  the  D'Annunzio  of  '  Francesca  da 
Rimini.'  For  are  we  not  the  heirs  of  the 
Italian  Renaissance,  and  shall  we  continue 
to  neglect  a  literature  not  inferior  to  the 
French  and  far  greater  than  the  German, 
a  literature  which  in  the  present  age  has 
produced  at  least  two  immortal  names  ? 
Least  of  all  can  we  dream  of  so  doing,  after 
gazing  at  the  masterpieces  of  Italian  paint- 
ing. Would  it  not  be  well  to  know  what 
these  great  men  read,  thought,  and  wrote  ? 

165 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

Have  we  forgotten  that  Italy  is  also  the 
first,  and  will  perhaps  be  the  last,  home  of 
the  purest  and  most  noble  music  ?  To 
understand  the  spirit  of  the  greatest  artistic 
country  the  world  has  ever  known,  greater, 
in  my  opinion,  than  Greece  herself,  by 
virtue  of  Leonardo  and  Michelangelo,  not 
to  mention  Scarlatti  and  Pergolesi,  is  surely 
the  direct  duty  of  anyone  who  desires  to 
enjoy  all  that  life  can  offer,  and  to  assist 
others  to  share  his  delight." 

These  long  extracts  have  been  given 
primarily  for  the  purpose  of  showing  the 
importance  of  "  The  Grecians  "  to  anyone 
who  wishes  to  appreciate  fully  the  quality 
and  nature  of  the  poet's  mind.  I  hope, 
however,  that  they  may  have  the  effect  of 
sending  readers  to  the  book  itself.  The 
point  of  view  is,  perhaps,  likely  to  become 
old-fashioned,  and  the  literary  judgments 
expressed  in  it,  in  the  main  so  just  and 
166 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

sound,  may  run  counter  to  the  taste  or 
preferences  of  the  future,  for  taste  is  always 
changing.  But  the  quality  of  sincerity  the 
dialogue  will  always  have,  and  it  is  nowhere 
seen  to  better  advantage  than  in  the  con- 
cluding sentences  of  the  discourse  : 

"  But  we  will  re-found  La  Giocosa,  and 
build  it  anew  in  England  beside  the  sea 
that  typifies  our  race.  And  if  I  have  made 
no  single  direct  reference  to  patriotism,  let 
me  say  this  now.  Patriotism  is  not  taught 
by  bad  poetry  and  bad  literature,  by  rifle- 
clubs,  or  Union  Jacks,  or  essays  on  Tariff 
Reform.  La  Giocosa  will  give  England 
men  of  intelligence,  fit  to  govern  her,  and 
not  private  soldiers  fit  to  be  shot  down  for 
her  in  some  financial  war.  And  in  training 
Grecians  La  Giocosa  has  fulfilled  her  duty 
to  England.  Ours  shall  be  no  ideal  school 
for  the  ideal  youth,  but  a  place  where  hard 
work  is  done,  and  where  boys  are  toilfully 

167 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

prepared  for  the  difficulties  of  a  modern 
world;  yet  where,  too,  we  shall  train  many 
to  understand  and  love  the  sweet  pleasures 
of  the  senses.  We  even  hope  that  a  few  of 
our  scholars  will  be  among  the  great.  Now, 
my  friends,  our  long  and  toilsome  journey  is 
over  :   and  it  is  evening." 

"  The  King  of  Alsander,"  Flecker's  soli- 
tary novel,  has  always  seemed  to  me,  since 
I  first  read  it  in  its  entirety,  an  unsatisfactory 
and  unequal  performance.  It  has  some 
beautiful  passages  and  many  amusing  ones, 
but  it  never  quite  "  comes  off."  The  high 
spirits  are  only  intermittent,  and  there  are 
some  dismal  slabs  of  "  fine  writing  "  which 
destroy  all  effect  of  spontaneity.  Flecker, 
like  most  poets,  had  a  tendency  to  adorn 
his  prose  too  richly.  It  is  just  as  difficult 
for  English  prose  to  wear  jewels  with  success, 
as  it  is  for  an  Englishman  to  wear  diamond 
studs  in  his  shirt  front ;  and  Flecker  did  not 
168 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

always  restrain  his  liking  for  the  purple 
patch.  He  is,  perhaps,  at  his  best  as  a  prose 
stylist  in  some  of  his  critical  studies,  in 
those  two  charming  papers  "Mansur"  and 
"  Pentelicus,"  and  in  such  vigorous  out- 
pourings as  Philanthropists.  Both  "The 
Last  Generation" — a  story  issued  as  a 
pamphlet  by  the  New  Age  Press  in  1908,  and 
begun  while  the  author  was  at  Oxford — and 
the  brief  sketch  called  "N'Jawk,"  illustrate 
very  happily  Flecker's  love  of  the  fantastic 
and  the  grotesque.  "  N'Jawk  "  is  a  delicious 
trifle,  as  amusing  to-day  as  when  I  first 
read  it  in  typescript  fifteen  years  ago.  It 
makes  one  wish  that  instead  of  spending 
months  and  years  of  toil  over  "  The  King 
of  Alsander,"  Flecker  had  devoted  the  same 
amount  of  energy  to  writing  a  series  of 
these  fantastic  sketches,  which  would  have 
made  a  volume  not  unworthy  of  the  poet, 
and  interesting  as  illustrating  his  irony 
and  wit. 

m  169 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

In  his  critical  studies,  Flecker  gives  voice 
to  his  literary  preferences  and  opinions  with 
characteristic  impetuousness  and  vigour,  and 
these  pages  in  his  "  Collected  Prose  "  are 
extremely  readable  and  illuminating.  Some 
of  his  enthusiasms  it  is  not  easy  to  share, 
and  occasionally  his  abuse  and  denuncia- 
tions seem  excessive.  One  gets  the  impres- 
sion that  he  divided  authors  into  those  who 
were  "  magnificent  "  and  those  who  wrote 
"  God-forsaken  formless  muck."  Writing, 
for  example,  of  William  Watson,  he  says  : 
"  The  temporary  reputation  acquired  by 
Mr.  Watson  is  particularly  pernicious  to 
the  well-being  of  Poetry  ;  and  it  is  ridiculous 
as  well  as  aggravating  that  any  notice  should 
be  taken  of  his  pompous  outcries."  But  in 
the  same  essay  from  which  this  is  taken 
he  shows,  in  observation  after  observation, 
that  there  is  technical  knowledge  and  sound 
sense  behind  his  damning  and  his  praising. 
Of  Mr.  Housman,  the  author  of  the  "  Shrop- 
170 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

shire  Lad  "  (a  volume  by  which  he  was  con- 
siderably influenced  and  from  which  he 
learnt  much),  he  writes  :  "  Within  metres 
almost  as  limited  and  simple  as  those 
employed  with  ascetic  choice  by  the  author 
of  '  Emaux  et  Camees,'  Mr.  Housman  ex- 
hibits a  great  subtlety  of  workmanship.  It 
would  not  only  be  dreadfully  prosaic,  but 
also  rather  unfair  to  expose  at  any  length 
his  wizard  tricks.  The  infinite  joys  that 
all  true  lovers  of  poetry  find  in  the  deft 
manipulation  of  verbal  sounds  are  almost 
too  sacred  for  explanation.  Let  a  short 
poem  be  quoted,  almost  at  random  : 

Now  hollow  fires  burn  out  to  black 

And  lights  are  gathering  low. 
Square  your  shoulders,  lift  your  pack, 

And  leave  your  friends  and  go. 

O  never  fear,  man  :   naught's  to  dread, 

Look  not  left  nor  right. 
In  all  the  endless  roads  you  tread 

There's  nothing  but  the  night. 

The  quiet  and  forcible  alliterations  of  the 

171 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

first  and  last  lines,  the  surprising  vigour  of 
the  third,  the  impressive  slowness  of  the 
fifth  line  is  remarkable.  There  is,  more- 
over, an  art  in  the  juxtaposition  of  sounds 
about  which  it  is  rather  sacrilegious  to  talk, 
not  because  of  any  superhuman  merit  in 
this  particular  poem,  but  because  the  art 
of  melody  is  one  of  suggestion,  and  not  of 
code."  Here  is  one  poet  writing  about 
another  with  the  accent  of  authority.  He 
can  say  with  impunity  much  that  the  lay- 
man would  scarcely  dare  to  say  even  if  he 
thought  it.  Flecker  may  not  always  be 
right,  but  his  opinions  have  at  least  an 
intrinsic  and  lasting  interest. 

Of  the  art  of  criticism  in  general  Flecker 
took  a  very  high  view.  In  his  essay  on 
"  The  Public  as  Art  Critic,"  he  gives  a 
brief  but  illuminating  sketch  of  the  ideal 
critic  of  poetry.  "  The  critic  of  poetry 
must  know  all  the  minutiae  of  the  technique, 
not  so  much  that  he  may  be  able  to  carp  at 
172 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

faults  as  that  he  may  realise  perfection. 
He  must  know  his  art  so  well  that  he  feels  at 
once  and  instinctively,  not  after  reflection 
merely,  whether  the  lines  he  is  reading  ring 
true.  Yet  he  must  not  be  a  pedant  :  he 
must  have  deep  experience  of  life,  he  must 
be  a  man  of  character.  In  the  true  sense 
of  the  word  he  must  be  moral.  He  must 
prepare  for  his  task  austerely  :  it  is  a  high 
one.  He  must  cast  aside  for  an  hour  his  own 
puritanism  and  prejudice,  his  petty,  even 
his  noble  beliefs  about  the  world,  and 
become  receptive  of  the  impressions  of 
others  to  the  extreme  limit  of  human 
nature.  .  .  .  The  critic  must  be  of  purer 
mould  than  the  poet  himself.  He  must 
have  a  profound  love  for  man,  not  the 
vague  enthusiasm  of  the  humanitarian  but 
a  vivid  delight  in  all  the  men  in  the  world, 
men  sinful,  men  splendid,  men  coarse,  or 
cowardly,  or  pathetic.  And  in  all  the 
phenomena    of   nature,    sordid    or    shining, 

173 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

the  background  to  our  tragedy,  he  must 
admire,  if  not  the  beauty,  then  the  force, 
the  law,  the  cruelty,  and  the  power.  And 
with  this  enthusiasm  in  his  soul  he  will 
bitterly  condemn  dullness,  weakness,  bad 
workmanship,  vulgar  thought,  shoddy  senti- 
ment as  being  slanders  on  mankind  ;  and 
in  this  sense  and  this  sense  only — that  it  is 
the  glory  of  man — great  art  is  moral." 

This  passage  is  an  additional  illustration 
of  the  fact  that  there  must  always  be  a 
strain,  at  least,  of  true  "  nobility "  in 
every  fine  artist,  and  that  Flecker  had  very 
much  more  than  a  strain  of  it  in  him. 

Of  Flecker's  play,  "  Hassan,"  which  in 
years  to  come  may  be  considered  his  master- 
piece—so wonderfully  is  it  compounded  of 
poetry  and  farce,  of  the  fantastic  and  the 
beautiful— it  is  too  early  yet  to  speak  in 
detail.  I  read  the  MS.  of  the  play  in  bed  — 
in  the  hotel  in  Paris  in  which  Oscar  Wilde 
died — on  a  rainy  January  morning.  I  had 
174 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

to  read  it  hastily,  because  the  MS.  was 
required  of  me  and  I  was  unable  to  prolong 
my  stay  in  France.  Before  one  will  have 
a  chance  of  judging  it  adequately  it  must 
be  seen  in  its  printed  form,  and  it  must  be 
seen  upon  the  stage,  produced,  as  near  as 
may  be,  in  accordance  with  Flecker's  ideas. 
It  is  to  be  hoped  that,  at  no  very  distant 
date,  it  may  be  possible  to  do  both  these 
things.  Then,  unless  the  impressions  which 
I  gained  from  the  MS.  were  utterly  mistaken, 
the  wider  public  to  whom  Flecker  is  still 
all  but  unknown  will  begin  to  realise  what 
manner  of  man  it  is  whose  work  they  have 
been  content  for  so  long  to  neglect. 

Flecker  is  a  poet  who  has  had  to  wait  a 
long  time  for  that  recognition  and  accept- 
ance which  is  his  due.  But  when  at  last  he 
receives  it  one  may  be  forgiven  for  believing 
that  the  recognition  will  be  general  among 
educated     people  :      and     the     acceptance 

permanent. 

175 


VII 


VII 

[The  following  appreciation  of  James  Elroy 
Flecker  was  written  by  Mr.  John  Mavro- 
gordato  at  Florence,  on  January  14,  1915, 
less  than  a  fortnight  after  the  poet's  death. 
He  has  kindly  given  me  permission  to 
print  it  here.  — D.G.] 

THERE  was  something  so  essentially 
youthful  about  the  enthusiasm  of 
J.  E.  Flecker's  poetry  that  some 
critics  may  say  that  his  early  death  was  not 
unexpected.  Poetry  for  him,  as  for  Keats, 
meant  always  a  passionate  love  of  beauty, 
a  passionate  and  impatient  love.  He  was 
more  fortunate  than  Keats  in  that  his  con- 
sular appointments  took  him  to  many  of 
the  actual  places  of  his  coloured  dreams  ; 
but  his  body  was  being  slowly  consumed  by 

179 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

the  tainted  flames  of  the  same  disease.  His 
last  years  were  spent  between  his  work  in 
Turkey  and  periods  of  partial  recovery  in 
England ;  until  the  last  attack  sent  him 
last  summer  to  Davos,  where  he  died. 

The  work  of  a  vice-consul  in  the  British 
Levant  Consular  service  is  underpaid,  of 
course,  and  not  as  exciting  as  it  sounds. 
He  often  longed  for  English  talk  and  English 
books  and  the  low-toned  English  country  ; 
and  one  of  his  poems,  written  in  the  Lebanon, 
tells  how  he  used  to  dream  of  England  in  his 
Turkish  exile,  just  as  he  had  dreamed  in 
England  of  the  East.  Some  of  the  few 
exciting  incidents  of  his  official  career  he 
described  in  an  article,  as  far  as  I  know  his 
last  published  work,  which  appeared  in 
The  New  Statesman  a  few  weeks  ago. 

But  if  his  early  death  was  only  shocking 
as  the  inevitable  end  must  always  be,  it 
was,  indeed,  a  bitter  surprise  to  find  it 
announced  in  six  inches  of  The  Times  as  a 
180 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

"  Loss  to  English  Poetry."  I  don't  mean  to 
say  that  the  papers  were  quite  unapprecia- 
tive  during  his  lifetime.  They  were,  on  the 
whole,  as  kind  as  the  press  of  any  nation, 
with  the  possible  exception  of  France,  is 
expected  to  be  to  any  young  poet.  The 
average  reviewer  is  not  a  detector  of  genius, 
but  only  the  shop-walker  of  journalism,  the 
usher  of  the  so-called  "  reading  public  "  : 
and  the  public's  attitude  to  poetry  is  that 
of  the  Italian  housekeeper  who  lately  re- 
proached one  who  went  to  market  and  came 
home  with  an  armful  of  flowers — "  Molto 
hello,  but  why  spend  money  to  get  a  head- 
ache ? '  Flecker's  books  were  well,  if 
sparsely,  noticed,  and  his  poems  were  occa- 
sionally published  in  the  best  reviews.  But 
few  will  believe,  especially  when  they  read 
the  columns  of  praise  that  will  presently 
appear,  the  insults  and  delays  he  was  com- 
pelled to  suffer,  submitting  his  works,  as 
he    was    nearly    always    bound    to,    from    a 

181 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

distance,  and  depending  for  the  most  part 
on  flights  of  letters  and  postcards  to  remind 
editors  of  his  existence.  Only  at  the  end 
of  July  [1914]  he  wrote  to  me  characteristi- 
cally on  a  postcard  : 

"Damn    Austria.      Also    damn .* 

Could  you  please  be  so  monstrous  kind 
as  to  rescue  my  '  Paul  Fort '  MS.  I  can't 
get  a  word  out  of  him.  I  am  horribly  ill 
and  can  hardly  write.  Hope  some  day 
to  finish  '  Ode  on  Greece.'  The  savage 
bitterness  of  its  preface  would  relieve 
me.  .  .  .  Why  don't  the  Hellenic  League 
protest  against 's  pompous  inepti- 
tudes ?  .  .  .  All  I  can  do  is  a  few  lines 
of  translation  of  '  Virgil.'  ..." 

I  don't  know  whether  the  article  on 
"  Paul  Fort  "  was  ever  published,  by  that 
or  by  some  other  editor ;  it  would  cer- 
tainly be  interesting  to  read  a  criticism  of 

*  An  editor, 

182 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

France's  prince  des  poetes,  written  by  the 
most  individual  among  England's  younger 
poets,  differing  as  they  do  in  style  and  tem- 
perament. Paul  Fort's  every  thought  seems 
to  run  naturally  into  a  rhythmic  exuberance, 
while  Flecker's  had  to  be  strained  by  a  fine 
sense  of  language  and  refined  till  it  could 
shine  with  beauty's  clearest  ray. 

He  was  a  scholar  and  always  a  student 
of  languages.  "  What  can  they  know  of 
English  who  only  English  know  ?  "  being  for 
him  the  best  misquotation  of  that  much- 
abused  aphorism.  So  he  was  a  great  reader 
of  the  modern  as  well  as  of  the  Oriental  and 
classical  tongues.  Only  for  him  a  knowledge 
of  French  must  include  the  power  to  appre- 
ciate the  experiments  of  Moreas  and  the 
squibs  of  Georges  Courtcline,  just  as  any 
valuable  reading  of  Latin  was  bound  to 
extend  to  Petronius  and  Apuleius. 

This  view  of  Greek  and  Latin  studies, 
shared,  indeed,  by  some  Oxford  and  Cam- 

183 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

bridge  scholars,  but  not  generally  by  school- 
masters, he  put  forward  in  a  charming 
dialogue  on  the  ideal  public-school  education, 
called  "  The  Grecians  "  :  it  was  published 
by  Dent  about  five  years  ago,  and  immedi- 
ately forgotten.  Towards  the  better  study 
of  modern  languages  he  wrote,  besides  a 
number  of  translations,  an  Italian  grammar 
"  for  scholars,"  in  which  an  outline  of  the 
grammar,  explained  where  possible  by  refer- 
ence to  the  corresponding  Latin  forms,  was 
supplemented  by  a  short  anthology  of  Italian 
literature,  from  Dante  and  Boccaccio  to 
d'Annunzio  and  Carducci.  (He  sold  the 
copyright  for  a  few  pounds,  and  had  the 
annoyance  not  only  of  not  being  allowed 
to  see  proofs,  but  also  of  having  his  work 
revised  by  another  hand  before  it  was 
published  under  his  name.) 

His    only    other    prose    work*    was    the 

*  Not  to  mention  a  few  scattered  articles  and  reviews,  one, 
for  instance,  on  the  early  work  of  Mr.  J.  C.  Siiaith,  and  an 
early  pamphlet  called,  I  think,  "The  Last  Generation." 

184 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

picaresque,  or,  as  some  would  prefer  to  call 
it,  Ruritanian  novel,  "  The  King  of  Al- 
sander,"  a  work  of  very  personal  charm, 
although  the  clear  vision  of  romance  that 
makes  the  opening  chapter  so  uncommonly 
alluring  is  confused  by  some  dusty  and 
gruesome  incidents,  as,  for  that  matter,  is 
the  masterpiece  of  Apuleius  to  whom  the 
author  here  confessed  his  devotion. 

There  used  to  be  among  his  manuscripts 
a  couple  of  plays,  of  course  unproduced  ; 
one  a  fantastic  tragedy  on  a  "  Don  Juan  " 
theme,  the  other  an  heroic  farce  in  an  atmo- 
sphere of  the  "  Arabian  Nights." 

There  remain  the  poems,  four  thin 
volumes,  of  which  the  second  and  third 
contain  almost  the  same  pieces,  and  the 
last  two  practically  all  the  best  of  his 
poetical  work.  Among  these  forty  or  fifty 
poems  it  is  hard  to  indicate  the  best  to 
those  who  do  not  already  know  them.  But 
one  remembers  specially  his  reproductions  of 
N  185 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

Oriental  metrical  forms  :  there  is,  for  instance, 
a  gh'azel  (if  that  is  the  way  to  transliterate 
it)  to  "  Yasmin "  which  contains  all  the 
fainting  loveliness  of  the  East  without  fall- 
ing into  the  sickly  convention  of  the  bulbul 
and  the  rose.  Flecker's  diction  was  never 
extravagant.  He  understood  the  rule  that 
any  inversion  is  sudden  death  to  a  modern 
lyric.  Similarly,  his  imagery,  however  ex- 
quisitely conceived  or  expressed,  was  always 
based  on  the  simplicity  of  ordinary  percep- 
tions :  the  common  life  and  business  of  the 
East,  the  ordinary  but  magic  love  of  a  young 
man,  the  forms  and  colours  and  emanating 
emotions  of  trees  and  hills  and  sea  — 

"  the  dragon-green,  the  luminous,  the  dark, 
the  serpent-haunted  sea." 

All  his  poems  are  the  work  of  a  scholar. 
Not  because  they  make  any  show  of  pe- 
dantry or  erudition,  but  because  they  seem 
to  have  been  conceived  in  a  mind  accus- 
186 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

tomed  to  classic  shapes  :  each  poem,  that 
is,  seems  to  have  a  form  of  its  own,  pre- 
existent  in  the  mind,  after  a  melodic  pattern 
laid  up  in  heaven,  like  the  form  of  a  Greek 
statue  pre-existent  in  the  tranquillity  of 
Pentelicus.  Scholarship,  too,  has  chosen 
the  diction.  The  history  and  associations 
of  every  word,  as  well  as  the  absolute  sound, 
seem  to  contribute  to  the  effect,  as,  of 
course,  they  should.  Words  in  poetry  should 
be  hard,  with  a  clear-cut,  gem-like  outline  ; 
but  in  some  of  these  poems,  without  ever 
becoming  soft  like  the  vague  predications 
of  some  of  our  modern  mystics,  the  language 
combines  this  classical  purity  and  definite- 
ncss  of  shape  with  a  lustre  like  that  of  a 
pearl. 

It  is  to  be  hoped  that  some  attempt  will 
be  made  to  collect  Flecker's  scattered  pieces  ; 
even  the  plays  might  be  published,  as  they 
would  give  some  idea  of  the  robust  humour 
that  was  part  of  his  character. 

187 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

His  life  was  not  easy,  but  he  found,  as 
poets  do,  an  intenser  enjoyment  of  it  than 
ordinary  men  ;  and  he  was  happy  in  the 
power  to  put  the  essence  of  this  into  his 
writing.  So  his  work  is  the  proper  memorial 
of  the  tall  and  foreign-looking  figure,  dark- 
eyed,  and  shyly  excitable,  that  passed  in  a 
few  years  from  Oxford  and  Cambridge  to 
Smyrna,  from  the  Cots  wold  Sanatorium 
again  to  Beyrout,  and  then  tragically  to 
Switzerland. 

He  was  a  clear  soul  burning  with  many 
flames,  loving  physical  beauty  in  many 
forms,  and  longing  always  to  immortalise 
it  in  words.    He  will  not  be  forgotten. 


188 


BIBLIOGRAPHY 


BIBLIOGRAPHY 
OF  JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

The  Best  Man.  Eights'  Week,  1906.  Holywell 
Press,  Oxford. 
[Issued  at  6d.,  in  scarlet  paper  wrappers,  for 
sale  during  Eights'  Week.  The  letterpress  is 
almost  entirely  by  Flecker,  the  drawings  are 
by  Mr.  J.  D.  Beazley,  of  Christchurch,  Oxford. 
There  is  no  copy  in  the  British  Museum.] 

The    Bridge   of  Fire,    poems   by   James    Flecker. 

London.     Elkin     Mathews,     Vigo     Street. 

1907. 

[No.   45  in   "The  Vigo  Cabinet  Series."     It 

contains  64  pages  and  is  bound  in  red  printed 

paper  wrappers.] 

The  Last  Generation  ;    a  Story  of  the  Future,  by 

James  Elroy  Flecker.    The  New  Age  Press, 

140  Fleet  Street,  London.     1908. 

[This  is  a  volume  of  64  pages,  issued  in  light 

fawn  printed  paper  wrappers,  the  front  cover 

bearing  an  illustration  of  a  scene  in  the  story. 

It  is  now  extremely  scarce.     There  is  no  copy 

in  the  British  Museum.] 

191 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

Thirty-Six  Poems,  by  James  Elroy  Flecker.  Lon- 
don, The  Adelphi  Press  Ltd.  1910. 
[Issued  in  red  cloth,  lettered  across  the  back 
and  on  the  front,  in  gilt.  Unopened  edges.  The 
unbound  sheets  of  this  book  were  later  trans- 
ferred to  Messrs.  J.  M.  Dent  and  Sons,  Ltd. 
There  are  probably  not  more  than  200  bound 
copies  in  existence.] 

The  Grecians,  a  dialogue  on  Education,  by  James 
Elroy  Flecker,  sometime  scholar  of  Trinity 
College,  Oxford,  and  Student-interpreter 
at  Caius  College,  Cambridge.  London, 
J.  M.  Dent  and  Sons,  Ltd.  New  York, 
E.  P.  Dutton  and  Co.  1910. 
[Issued  in  green  cloth,  lettered  on  back  in 
gilt.] 

The   Scholar's   Italian  Book,   an    introduction   to 

the  study  of  the  Latin  Origins  of  Italian, 

by  J.   E.   Flecker.     London,   David  Nutt, 

57-9  Long  Acre.     1911. 

[Issued  in  black  cloth  lettered  in  gilt  on  back.] 

Forty-Two    Poems,    by    James    Elroy    Flecker. 

London,   J.   M.   Dent  and   Sons,   Limited. 

1911. 

[Issued  in  dark  red  cloth,  lettered  on  back 

and  front  in  gilt.     This  volume  is  a  reissue  of 

Thirty-Six  Poems,  with  six  new  poems  added.] 

192 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

The  Golden  Journey  to  Samarkand,  by  James 
Elroy  Flecker.  London,  Max  Goschen, 
Ltd.,  20  Great  Russell  Street,  W.C.    1913. 

[Issued  in  dark  blue  cloth,  lettered  on  back 
and  front  in  gilt. 

There  was  also  an  edition  de  luxe  limited  to 
50  copies,  printed  on  fine  paper,  issued  in  drab 
boards,  with  vellum  back,  lettered  across  the 
back  in  gilt  and  on  front  in  gilt.  Top  edges 
gilt  and  fore  edges  unopened.  A  certificate  of 
issue,  which  is  numbered  and  signed  by  the 
author,  is  pasted  in  the  upper  left-hand  corner 
of  the  inside  front  cover  of  each  copy.  When 
the  book  was  transferred  to  Mr.  Martin  Seeker 
the  remaining  copies  of  this  edition  de  luxe  were 
reissued  with  a  cancel  title,  bearing  Mr.  Seeker's 
imprint.  Considerably  less  than  fifty  copies  of 
the  original  issue  are  now  in  existence.  The 
average  price  at  which  they  change  hands  when 
they  come  into  the  market  is  (May,  1922)  £5  5s.] 

The  King  of  Alsander,  by  James  Elroy  Flecker. 

London,    Max    Goschen,    Ltd.,    20    Great 

Russell  Street,  W.C.     1914. 

[Issued  in  scarlet  buckram,  lettered  on  back 

in  gilt    and   on    front    in  white    foil  with   gilt 

crown.     Afterwards    transferred    to    Messrs.    G. 

Allen  and  Unwin.  Ltd.,  and  reissued  by  them 

with  cancel  title.] 

193 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

The  Old  Ships,  by  James  Elroy  Flecker.    London, 
The  Poetry  Bookshop,  35  Devonshire  Street, 
Theobald's  Road,  W.C.     1916. 
[Foolscap  4to.    Issued  in  greyish  blue  printed 
paper  wrappers,   with  a  large  illustration  of  a 
ship  with  mermaid  on  front  cover.     The  mer- 
maid was  eliminated  in  later  issues.] 

God  Save  the  King,  by  James  Elroy  Flecker. 

[Issued  in  green  paper  wrappers,  by  Mr. 
Clement  Shorter.  The  following  bibliographical 
note  appears  on  p.  12  :  "  This  poem  and  the 
accompanying  Foreword  appeared  in  The  Sphere 
for  January  16th,  1915.  Twenty  copies  have 
been  printed  by  Clement  Shorter  for  distribution 
among  his  friends."] 

The  Burial  in  England,  by  James  Elroy  Flecker. 
Born  1884.  Died  1915. 
[Issued  in  dark  blue  paper  wrappers.  The 
following  bibliographical  note  appears  on  p.  2  : 
"  Of  this  poem,  first  published  in  The  Sphere 
newspaper  of  February  27th,  1915,  twenty 
copies  have  been  printed  by  Clement  Shorter 
for  distribution  among  his  friends."] 

The  Collected  Poems  of  James  Elroy  Flecker, 
edited  with  an  introduction,  by  J.  C. 
Squire.     London,   Martin   Secker?   Number 

194 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 

Five  John  Street,  Adelphi.     (On  verso  of 
title-page  :    1916.) 
[Issued  in  blue  cloth  with  paper  name  and 
title-label  on  back.] 

Selected  Poems,  by  James  Elroy  Flecker.    London 
Martin   Seeker,  Number  Five  John  Street, 
Adelphi.     (On  verso  of  title-page  :  1918.) 
[Issued  in  blue  cloth  with  paper  name  and 
title-label  on  back.] 

Collected  Prose,  by  James  Elroy  Flecker.    G.  Bell 
and  Sons.     MCMXX. 
[Issued   in   brownish   red   cloth,    with   paper 
name  and  title-label  in  red  on  back.] 

Fourteen  Poems,  by  James  Elroy  Flecker,  with 
lithographs  by  Charles  Freegrove  Winzer. 
Dijon :  printed  by  Maurice  Darantiere. 
MCMXXI. 

[This  volume  was  issued  by  Mrs.  Helle  Flecker, 
the  poet's  widow,  in  an  edition  limited  to  500 
copies.  It  bears  no  publisher's  imprint,  but  is 
(1922)  obtainable  in  London  at  The  Poetry  Book 
Shop,  35  Devonshire  St.,  W.C.,  and  in  Paris  at 
Shakspeare  and  Co.,  12  rue  de  l'Odeon.] 

The  Story  of  Hassan  of  Bagdad  and  how  he  came 
to  make  the  Golden  Journey  to  Samarkand, 
by  James  Elroy  Flecker. 
|  Awaiting  publication.] 

L95 


INDEX 


Abercrombie,  Lascelles,  75 
Academy,  The,  62,  63 
Apuleius,  160,  162 
Arabian  Nights,  The,  185 
Areiya,  95,  97 
Ariosto,  Ludovico,  164 
Aristophanes,  161 
Aristotle,  98 
Athenceum,  The,  77 

Ballad  of  Camden  Town,  The, 

134 
Ballad  of  Hampstead  Heath, 

The,  131 
Ballad  of  Iskander,  The,  91, 

134 
Ballad  of  London,  The,  133 
Ballad  of  the  Student  in  the 

South,  The,  133 
Bandello,  165 

Barker,  Granville,  7,  8,  89, 90 
Bar  bey,  d'Aurevilly,  100 
Battaille,  Henri,  97 
Baudelaire,  Charles,  8 
Beardsley,  Aubrey,  8,  32 
Beazley,  J.  D.,  37,  59,  63,  93 
Bell  &  Sons,  Messrs.  George, 

153 

196 


Birmingham    Repertory 

Theatre,  The,  89 
Boccaccio,    Giovanni,    165, 

184 
Boyer,  Lucien,  53 
Branche  de  Lilas,  La,  59 
Bridge  of  Fire,  The,  20,  31, 

55,  62,  93,  130-3 
Brooke,  Rupert,  39 
Browne,  Professor,    E.   G., 

37 
Browning,  Robert,  68 
Bruant,  Aristide,  53 
Brumana,  93,  136 
Bryan,  97 
Burial  in  England,  The,  142, 

147 
Burton,  Sir  Richard,  140 
Byron,  Lord,  42 

Caesar,  Julius,  162 
Caius  College,  Cambridge,  33 
Cambridge  Review,  The,  43 
Carducci,  165,  184 
Carlyle,  Thomas,  159 
Catullus,  Caius  Valerius,  162 
Cellini,  Benvenuto,  67 
Chapman,  George,  21 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 


Chesterton,  G.  K.,  158 
Cicero,  Marcus  Tullius,  159, 

1G1 
Clemenceau,  Georges,  35 
Collected   Poems,    127,    128, 

131,  133 
Collected  Prose,  153,  170 
Conrad,  Joseph,  7,  157 
Constantine,  King,  147 
Courteline,  Georges,  183 
Courthorpe,  Professor  W.  J., 

41 
Crabbe,  George,  42 

Daguerches,  97 
Daily  News,  The,  11 
Danielson,  Henry,  vii. 
D'Annunzio,  Gabriele,   165, 

184 
Dante  Alighieri,  164, 165, 184 
Dayrell-Reed,    Trelawney, 

vii,  31,  49,  63 
De  la  Mare,  Walter,  7 
De  Lisle,  Leconte,  29, 138 
Demosthenes,  165,  184 
Dent  &  Sons,  Ltd.,  Messrs. 

J.  M.,  64,  77,  153,  184 
De  Regnier,  Henri,  96,  138 
Desire,  30 

Don  Juan,  94,  118,  185 
Doris,  95 

Dowson,  Ernest,  8 
Drinkwater,  John,  89 
Dulce  Lumen,  Triste  Numen, 

Suave   Lumen   Luminum, 

134 
Dunsany,  Lord,  92 


Eagle,  Solomon,  91 
Edwardes,  George,  8 
English  Review,  The,  1 
Enid  and  Geraint,  158 
Envoy,  130 
Euripides,  160 
Evening  Standard,  The,  113 
Everyman,  91 

Fabian  Society,  The,  39 
Farrere,  Claude,  91 
Fitzgerald,  Edward,  104 
Flecker,    James    Elroy,   the 
product  of  his  age,  6-13  ; 
life  at  Oxford,  13-22  ;   as 
a    schoolmaster,     27-30 ; 
life  at  Cambridge,  33-43  ; 
life  in  the  East,  43-5  ;  life 
in    London,    49-69 ;     his 
poetry,    73-150 ;     life    in 
Switzerland,  80-121  ;    his 
prose,  153-75 
Flecker,    D.D.,    The    Rev. 

William  Herman,  27 
Fort,  Paul,  82,  99,  182,  183 
Fortnightly  Review,  The,  82 
Forty-Two  Poems,  64,  81, 133 
From  Grenoble,  131 
Future  of  Poetry,  The,  106 

Gates  of  Damascus,  The,  81, 

83,  93,  94,  140,  141 
Gentlewoman,  The,  111 
George  V,  His  Majesty,  98 
"  Gertie,"  60,  61 
Gibbon,  Edward,  159 
Gibson,  John,  75 


197 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 


Glion-Evening,  128,  129 

Globe,  The,  113 

Golden  Journey  to  Samark- 
and, The,  5,  79,  82,  89,  90, 
92,102,104,111,112,115, 
125,  127,  128,  132,  135, 
137,  140,  141,  146 

Goschen,  Max,  73,  77,  86,  88, 
89,  101,  105-107,  110, 
112-15,  118,  153 

Gownsman,  The,  43 

Grecians,  The,  28,  153-68, 
184 

Hammam  Name,  141 
Hassan,  89,  90,  94,  95,  100, 

107,112,140,153,154,174 
Heinemann,  Messrs.William, 

154 
Heredia,  Jose  Maria  de,  138 
Herodotus,  161 
Hewlett,  Maurice,  158 
Homer,  160 

Hope,  Sir  Anthony,  158 
Housman,  A.  E.,  8,  170,  171 
Hugo,  Victor,  84 
Hyali,  83,  95 

Ideal,  The,  53,  54 
Idler,  The,  30,  31 
Ingpen,  Roger,  vii 
In  Hospital,  93 
In  Memoriam,  63 

Jugend,  51 
Juvenilia,  128 


Keats,  John,  21,  41,  42,  179 

King  of  Alsander,  The,  54, 
55,  82,  88,  103,  111,  113, 
115,  153,  168,  169,  185 

Kipling,  Rudyard,  11,  74, 
114,  157 

Knox,  J.  J.,  36,  51,  66 

Kubla  Khan,  131 

L'Assiette  an  Beurre,  51 
Last    Generation,    The,    38, 

153,  169,  184 
Lemaitre,  Jules,  100 
Leonardo  da  Vinci,  166 
Les  Merveilleuses,  8 
Levi,  Eugenia,  164 
Livy,  160 
Lord  Arnaldos,  92 
Lucian,  160 
Lucretius,  Titus  Carius,  162 

Mackenzie,  Compton,  13 
Manzoni,  164 
Marinier,  Paul,  53,  58 
Marsh,  Edward,  75 
Mary  Magdalen,  132 
Masefield,  John,  7,  74 
Masuccio,  165 
Mathews,  Elkin,  31,  55,  130 
Mavrogordato,  John,  vii,  179 
Michaelangelo      Buonarroti, 

166 
Mill  Hill,  30 
Moore,  T.  Sturge,  75 
Moreas,  183 
Morning  Post,  The,  101 


198 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 


Murray,    Professor    Gilbert, 

112,  114,  120 
Musset,  Louis  Alfred  de,  84 
My  Lilies,  16 

Nation,  The,  90 

Navaho,  59 

New  Age  Press,  The,  153,169 

New  Statesman,  The,  91,  180 

New  Year's  Carol,  A,  129 

N'Jawk,  169 

No  Coward's  Song,  57,  134 

Xutt,  David,  153 

Oak  and  Olive,  82,  83,  96 

Ode  on  Greece,  182 

Odes  of  Horace,  161,  164 

Old  Ships,  The,  128 

Old    War-ship   Ablaze,  The, 

128 
Ovid,  161 
Oxford     University     Press, 

The,  119,  120 

Parnassian     Theory,     The, 

137,  144,  146,  148 
Pater,  Walter,  78 
Peachum,  Mrs.,  61 
Peacock,  Thomas  Love,  163 
Pensive  Prisoner,  The,  128, 

143 
Pergolesi,  166 
Pericles,  160 

Petrarch,  Francesco,  164 
Phwacia,  44,  91,  93 
Philanthropists,  The,  169 
Pillage,  63,  J  34 


Plato,  161 

Plautus,  Titus  M.,  161 

Pliny  the  Younger,  162 

Pound,  Ezra,  75,  125 

Prayer,  57 

Public  as  Art  Critic,  The,  172 

Raphael,  J.  N.,  113 
Renard,  Jules,  91 
Richard  I,  King,  98 
Riouperoux,  55,  131 
Russian  Ballet,  The,  40 

Saadabad,  95,  141 
Sacred  Incident,  93 
Saladin,  98 
Saniain,  138 
Santorin,  92,  96 
Savery,  Frank,  vii,  18,  20,  92 
Scarlatti,  Alessandro,  166 
Schloss,  Arthur,  39 
Scholar's  Italian  Book,   28, 

153 
Sentimentalist,  The,  134 
Shakespeare,    William,    60, 

101 
Shaw,  George  Bernard,  7,  8, 

104 
Shelley,  Percy  Bysshe,  41, 

42  * 
Shorter,  Clement  K.,  113 
Simmons,  Charles,  27 
Sinister  Street,  13 
Snaith,  J.  C,  184 
Sohrab  and  Rustum,  158 
Sophocles,  160 
Spectator,  The,  90,  91 


199 


JAMES  ELROY  FLECKER 


Stage  Society,  The,  8 
Steinlen,  53,  58 
Stevenson,     Robert    Louis, 

157 
Stillness,  128,  143 
Strand  Magazine,  The,  121 
Swinburne,  Algernon  Charles, 

18 
Symons,  Arthur,  139 

Tacitus,    Marcus    Claudius, 

159,  162 
Taoping,  81,  84,  91,  93,  98 
Tennyson,  Alfred,  Lord,  68, 

114 
Terence,  161 
Theocritus,  161 
Thirty-six  Poems,  64,  76 
Thucydides,  160 
Tibullus,  162 
Times,  The,  101,  112,  113, 

121,  180 
To  a  Poet  a  Thousand  Years 

Hence,  134,  150 
Town  Without  a  Market,  The, 

53 
Trapes,  Diana,  61 
Tree,     Sir     Herbert     Beer- 

bohin,  106 


Trinity  College,  Oxford,  27 
Turkish  Lady,  The,  95 

University    College    School, 

27 
Uppingham,  27 

Velasquez,  Diego,  40 
Verlaine,  Paul,  8 
Verrall,  A.  W.,  37 
Virgil,  ^neid  VI,  103-105, 

107,108,112,114,118-20, 

161,  183 
Visit,  The,  63     ■ 

Walch,  85 

Waley,  Arthur,  39 

War  Song  of  the  Saracens, 

The,  64,  91,  134 
Watson,  Sir  William,  170 
Wells,  H.  G.,  7,  38,  109 
Westminster,  The,  113 
White  Ship,  The,  158 
Wilde,  Oscar,  8,  18,  32,  174 
Wordsworth,  William,  42 

Yasmin,  95,  141,  186 
Yeats,  W.  B.,  74,  93,  120 
Yellow  Book  of  Japes,  22 


UNIVERSITY  OF  CALIFORNIA  LIBRARY 
Los  Angeles 

This  book  is  DUE  on  the  last  date  stamped  below. 


2> 


new 


DEC  2  9 


D 


«*> 


Form  L9-10m-3,'48(A7920)444 


THE  LIBRARY 

UNlVJb.  '  ;..r,LIFORNlA 


UC  SOUTHERN  REGIONAL  LIBRARY  FACILITY 


AA    000  371  778    2