Skip to main content

Full text of "The joint worm (Isosoma tritici Fitch.)"

See other formats


a D OC TrppapT. 
u@) 1 WY. 5 FY et le 


Sond 


CIRCULAR No. 66, REVISED EDITION. OCT az (eee 18 Issued September 21, 1908. 


United States Department of Agriculture, 


BUREAU OF ENTOMOLOGY , 


L. O. HOWARD, Entomologist and Chief of Bureau. 


THE JOINT-WORM. 


(Isosoma tritici Fitch.) 


By F. M. WEBSTER, 
In Charge of Cereal and Forage Plant Insect Investigations. 


Since the first known serious outbreak of the joint-worm (/sosoma 
tritict Fitch), which occurred in the wheat fields about Charlottesville 
and Gordonsville, Va., during the years 1848 to 1854, this insect has 
been reported atirregularintervals and from widely separated localities. 
While it is known to occur sparingly over most of the wheat-growing 
sections of both the United States and Canada, and probably does 
more damage than has generally been attributed to it, its reappear- 
ance in the wheat fields of Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, 


AA \ MG 

ea, \ ee 
Sah Ee 
ae a 


a LiF 
“SE, iff 


Fia. 1.—Isosoma tritici: Adult of the joint-worm. Much enlarged (from Howard). 

@ West Virginia, Virginia, Maryland, and Kansas in 1904, and in still 
greater numbers in 1905, serves to bring it again to notice. In 1904 
some fields of wheat in eastern Ohio were so badly damaged that they 
were not harvested, and in 1905 a serious outbreak in northeastern 
Indiana so discouraged some farmers that they questioned the advisa- 
bility of putting in a crop of wheat at all. In southwestern Virginia 
the pest was even more injurious in 1905 than it was the previous year. 
The pest was also very destructive in western Ohio and eastern Indiana 
during the spring of 1908. 

52718—Cir. 66—08 


Historic, archived document 


Do not assume content reflects current 
scientific knowledge, policies, or practices. 


2 


Pe DESCRIPTION OF THE PEST. 


The fuily developed insect, somewhat resembling a small, winged 
black ant, is clearly shown, enlarged, in figure 1, its natural size being 
indicated by a line at the right. The color is black, with joints of legs 
and feet yellow. The larva or grub is whitish, with brown jaws, the 
length being about the same as that of the adult, and the form much 
hke that shown in figure 2, which represents the larva of a nearly 


related species. 
LIFE HISTORY. 


The insect may be found in wheat stems, inits various stages of devel- 
opment, throughout the year. It lives through the winter asa larva 
or grub in cells formed in the 
stems prior to the ripening of 
the grain, the adult emerging 
therefrom in April or May, ac- 
cording to 
latitude, or 
some time 
after the 
young grain 
has thrown 
up stems 
and several 
joints have 
become ex- 
posed. The 
female, us- 
ing her slen- 
der, pointed 
oviposit or, 
places her 
egos in the 
stems. The Fia.2.—Isosoma grande: 

. Larva of the wheat- 
exact posl- straw worm; é, anten- 


tion assum- na; f, jaw. Line at 
: y right indicates natural 
ed is shown 


length. (After Riley.) 
in figure 3, 


from a photograph from life 
by Mr. G.I. Reeves. The eggs 
Fic. 3.—Female Isosoma in act of depositing eggin hatch and the young grubs, 

stem. About life size (author’s illustration). forming cells, feed in the 
walls of the stem, reaching their maximum growth by the time the 
straw becomes fully hardened and ripe. Wintering in the larval 
state, they pass a short pupal stage and emerge as adults in the 


spring. While there are both males and females among these insects, 


[Cir. 66] 


@ 


3 


Mr. Phillips of this Bureau has, 
during two successive years, found 
that unfertilized females will deposit 
eggs and that these eggs will hatch 
out larve which develop to adult 
insects. It is probable, however, 
that these adults will be found to be 
largely or all males. 


EFFECT ON THE STRAW. 


The effect on the straw of the work 
of the joint-worm is exceedingly vari- 
able. Sometimes a distortion occurs 
like that illustrated in figure 4; at 
other times the straw is bent or 
twisted in almost every conceivable 
shape; again, there will be no enlarge- 
ment of the straw whatever; or there 
may be large galls or excrescences, as 
it were, bursting out of the base of 
the sheath at one side, some of these 
abnormal growths having pseudo- 
rootlets extending downward from 
their lower extremity. Sometimes 
the straw will make about normal 
erowth and the hardened sections will 
be restricted to an inch or there- 
abouts just above the lower joints; 
and, again, the growth will not exceed 
3 or 4 inches, often not heading at 
all, or with aborted head and with 
the straw galled or hardened to the 
base of the head. In some cases 
there is no outward indication of at- 
tack whatever, the affected part be- 
ing wholly inclosed in the sheath, and 
when this last isremoved the presence 
of the cells is indicated only by a 
slight discoloration, and frequently 
by a few small, more or less irregu- 
lar, elevated ridges. 

In thrashing the grain the hard- 
ened portions of the straw, as shown 
in figure 5, break up into pleces of  Fia.4.—One effect of Ufa FO in wheat 
from half an inch to an inch or more Peek ee 


[Cir. 66] 


4 


in length, many of which do not go over with the straw and chaff, 
but remain with the grain. The presence of these bits of broken straw 
in the grain is frequently the first evidence the farmer has seen of the 
occurrence of the pest in his fields. Millers and elevator men note 
them also, and in sections where the pest has committed serious dep- 
redations several bushels of these hardened bits of straw are found 
after each day’s cleaning of the grain. 


EFFECTS ON THE KERNEL. 


The wheat heads from infested stems are foreshortened, and the 
kernels thereby necessarily reduced in both size and number, and in 
case of severe attack they become shrunken. 


NATURAL ENEMIES. 


Natural enemies of the joint-worm are quite numerous, and 
most of them have the advantage of being double-brooded, whereas 
the joint-worm has but one generation 
annually. 3 

Among the most efficient of these are 
two rather common species of insects. 
One of these, almost as big as the Isosoma 
itself, with dull metallic thorax and yel- 
low abdomen and with long ovipositor, 
is Ditropinotus aureoviridis Crawford, and 
the other, smaller, darker colored, and 
slender, also somewhat resembling an 
Tsosoma, is FEupelmus allynii French. 
The writer reared also another species in 
Ohio, Websterellus tritici Ashm., which has 
similar habits. 

A somewhat similar insect with metal- 
lic body and yellow abdomen, Stictonotus 
Fic. 5.—Bits of hardened straw re- isosomatis Riley,is very efficient in destroy- 


maining with the grain afterthrash- : : = ra 
ee ena raat On) ing the larve in the straw. Homoporus 


Riley, and beyond a doubt other chalcidoids, are also instrumental in 
holding the pest in check. These are all small four-winged flies, and 
a number of additional, undescribed forms have been discovered. 
The larva of a smail, slender, black and yellow carabid beetle Lepto- 
trachelus dorsalis Fab.) crawls up, descends into the stubble, and de- 
vours the Isosoma larve, but unfortunately its sense of taste seems to 
be too obtuse to allow it to confine itself strictly to Isosoma, and as a 
consequence it devours parasites as well as host. A mite, Pedicu- 
loides (Hetoropus) ventricosus Newp., is also an enemy, gaining access 
to the larvee precisely as does the beetle larva previously mentioned. 
[Cir. 66] 


(Semiotellus) chalcidiphagus Walsh and @ 


5 
PREVENTIVE MEASURES. 


There are no known remedies for the joint-worm, but there are 
several preventive measures that are not impracticable and are 
reasonably efficient. 

In the midst of the outbreak in Virginia, previously mentioned, a 
‘‘Joint-worm Convention” was held at Warrenton, in that State, to 
devise means for controlling this pest. This body recommended a 
better system of farming, the use of guano and other fertilizers to pro- 
mote arapid growth and anearly ripening of the grain, and the burning 
of the stubble, all of which are as advisable to-day as they were at that 
time. The most serious ravages are observed on thin or impoverished 
soils, especially along the margins of the fields infested. Anything, 
then, that tends to add vigor to the young growing grain will constitute 
a preventive measure. Burning the stubble, where this is practicable, 
is, of course, most efficacious, but over the larger portion of the terri- 
tory ravaged by this pest it is customary to seed with grass after 
wheat, and under this condition burning over the stubble field is 
impossible. Such fields should be raked over with an ordinary hay 
rake, and the loosened stubble removed and burned before the adults 
have emerged in the spring. If, however, the grain is cut low at 
harvest, and the straw passed through the stables as bedding for 
stock during the winter, thus becoming saturated by liquids and more 
or less thoroughly composted, the treatment would seem sufficient to 
destroy the Isosoma larve so that few, if any, would develop adults 
the following spring. In case of bedding for horses, it seems quite 
probable that if any larve at all survived the thrashing machine, the 
heat from the decomposing manure would develop them prematurely. 
However, there has been no experimentation exactly along these 
lines, and according to a press bulletin? by Prof. R. H. Pettit, of 
the Michigan Agricultural College, serious injuries have followed the 
year after application and plowing under of barnyard manure in the 
fall before the wheat was sown. In this case the manure would 
necessarily be fresh and the bedding of straw of the same season’s 
growth, otherwise the adults would have already emerged. This 
would be a proposition quite different from that of allowing the stable 
manure to accumulate during the winter and applying it in the spring 
elsewhere than to the wheat fields, or even of applying it to wheat 
fields before plowing, months after the larve surviving the effects of 
the stable had developed and escaped. The one might destroy all or 
nearly all larve in the straw, and the survivors would emerge about 
the stables or in the barnyard; while the other method, simply to take 
the straw with the living larve present from an old field, move it 


@ Mich. Agr. Col. Exp. Sta., Press Bull. No. 15. The Wheat Joint-Worm. 
[Cir. 66] 


6 


through the stable, cart it out on a new field, and plow it under, is 
one that the farmer should evidently be careful to avoid. 

Exactly in this connection, an assistant, Mr. Charles N. Ainslie, 
while waiting between trains in the city of St. Louis, Mo., found 
at the corner of Sixteenth and Locust streets a pile of bricks to be 
used in the erection of a building. These bricks werestamped “‘ Mas- 
sillon, Ohio,” and were packed in straw which the chief contractor 
stated came with the bricks from Ohio. This straw contained larvee 
of this species which later on transformed to adults, but the latter 
did not emerge from the straw. 

Tn the past it has always been thought necessary, as a precautionary 
measure, to burn the infested bits of hardened straw that break up 
in thrashing the wheat, many 
being carried out with the 
erain instead of going over in 
the straw. Several experi- 
ments In rearing adults from 
large numbers of these broken 
bits of straw (fig. 5), collected 
about elevators and thrash- 
ing machines, has shown that 
almost all of the larve of 
both Isosoma and parasites 
are killed, probably by the 
concussion of the cylinder of 
the thrasher. In some cases 
we have been able to verify 
these experiments by collec- 

; e by tions of stubble from fields 

Fic. 6.—Wheat straws injured by the joint-worm . ay obeS 
(Isosoma tritici), from which the joint-worms have 10 the vicinity of these ele- 
been removed by some beneficial animal, perhaps the wators. So far as we have 
short-tail shrew (Blarina brevicauda). (Author’s illus- : : 5 “ : 
ation) gone into the investigation 
everything indicates that the 
danger from these broken bits of hardened straw, or even from the straw 
itself, is of too little importance to be worth consideration. Prof. R. H. 
Pettit, of the Michigan Agricultural College, and Mr. W.J. Phillips, of 
this Bureau, in 1906, found in northern Indiana great numbers of 
straws affected by the joint-worm, where the enveloping sheath had 
been torn away, the galls formed by the larve deftly eaten away, and 
the joint-worms missing. Inno case was the entire gall gnawed away, 
but just enough of the walls immediately over the larva to make pos- 
sible the removal of the latter (fig. 6). While we have not been able to 
get definite information as to the identity of this decidedly beneficial 


animal, suspicion seems to point to the short-tail shrew (Blarina 
[Cir. 66] 


( 


brevicauda) as the species to which credit should be given, and prob- 
ably much of the work is done while the grain is in shock. 

Rotation of crops is advantageous, because it necessitates the 
migration of adults from one field to another, and if this takes place in 
stormy weather or during high winds, many of the migrants will be 
killed or blown astray. It is easily seen that where infested straw is 
applied to a new field prior to sowing to wheat, this migration of 
adults would not be made necessary. 

The sowing of early ripening varieties is also beneficial. 


Approved: 
JAMES WILSON, 
Secretary of Agriculture. 
Wasuineton, D. C., July 16, 1908. 


[Cir. 66] 


O