UNIV.W
LIBRARY
BINDING LIST JUL 1 51921
f^J^
mwranJfewru
H^
E
Application for Entry as Second-Class Matter at the Post-Office at
Albany, N.Y., Pending
3tahj
lintrtuil of Atnrrmm Htatarg
Holrott* X33JI, 3Firat (jtoarfrr,
Jfabruarg iiarrl|
1919
LONDON B. P. Stevens & Brown
4 Trafalgar Square, W. C.
PARIS Brentano's
37, Avenue de 1'Opera
PETROGRAD.
DUBLIN
EDINBURGH.
MADRID.
ROME.
. Combridge and Company
18 Grafton Street
. Andrew Elliott
17 Princes Street
. Llbrerla Internacional de
Adrian Romo, Alcala 5
. L. Piale
1 Piazza di Spagna
CAIRO. . .
BOMBAY.
TOKIO.
MEXICO CITY.
ATHENS. .
BUENOS AYRES
Watkins and Company
Mnrskaia No. 36
P. Diemer
Shepheard'a Building
Thacker and Company Limited
Esplanade Road
Methodist Publishing House
2 Shichome, Olz Ginza
American Book and Printing Co.
1st San Francisco No. 12
Const. Electheroudakis
Place de la Constitution
John Grant and Son
Cnlle Cangallo 469
Blountal of Ammran Ijiatoru.
Jfftrat (Barter * $ftttrtmt Ntnrtwtt
VOLUME XIII JANUARY- FEBRUARY- MARCH NUMBER 1
by h,r National ^iatnriral (tomjiami. in (puarlrrhf
IFoiir iBiuikii to thr ifulitmr. at Jour Hollars Annuallg.
QDn? Hollar a (Hopg for &ino> Numbers, for
National ijifitnriral
Copyright, 1919, by The National Historical Society
Publication Office: 240 Hamilton Street, Albany, New York. Ira G. Payne, Manager
Editorial Offices: 37 West Thirty-ninth Street, New York
txrrutiur (Oftirrrs of 0-hr National lEoitorial Sirrrtnra of ehr Journal
^tatoriral ^orUtg of Ammran Ststnnj
FRANK ALLABEN, President FRANK ALLABEN, Editor-in-Chief
MABEL T. R. WASHBURN, Secretary MABEL T. R. WASHBURN, Genealogical Editor
DUDLEY BUTLER, Treasurer JOHN FOWLER MITCHELL, JR., Associate Editor
(rani> (Uounril of tlj* Hirp-
Arkansas MR S. J- H. Me EL HINNEY
PHILANDER KEEP ROOTS Daughters of the American Revolution
George Washington Memorial As-
sociation (Holoraoo
MRS. Louis FLICKINGER MRS. JOHN LLOYD McNEiL
State Recording Secretary Daughters Past Regent, Colorado, Daughters of
of the American Revolution the American Revolution
MRS. THOMAS MOSES CORY
Daughters of the American Revolution (EonnwtifUt
(California ^ ISS ADELINE E. ACKLEY
ROY MALCOM, A. M., PH. D.
Professor of History, University of fiistrtrt of (Columbia
Southern California ^RS- HENRY F. DIMOCK
MRS. CYRUS WALKER President George Washington Me-
HONORABLE NATHAN W. BLANCHARD, morial Association
A. M. Ex-California Representative CAPTAIN ALBERT HARRISON
NELSON OSGOOD RHOADES DEUSEN
Mayflower Society, Colonial Wars, Holland Society, Sons of the Ameri-
Sons of the Revolution can Revolution
[5]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
LEWIS HORN FISHER, LL. M.
Secretary United States Civil Service,
Fourth District
MRS. CLAUDE STELLE TINGLEY, B. S.,
M. A.
SISTER ESTHER CARLOTTA, S. R.
Ex-President Florida Division United
Daughters of the Confederacy
GEORGE P. CASTLE
WILLIAM D. WESTERVELT
lUfcwte
HONORABLE JOHN H. HUNGATE
President First National Bank, La
Harpe
MRS. GEORGE A. LAWRENCE
Honorary State Regent for life, Illi-
nois Daughters of the American
Revolution
MRS. HENRY CLAY PURMORT
Life-Member Society Mayflower
Descendants in Illinois
A. G. ZIMMERMAN, M. D.
JstbUma
JOHN FOWLER MITCHELL
President William Mitchell Printing
Company
HONORABLE GEORGE H. COOPER
Cashier Greenfield Citizens' Bank
Junta
SHERMAN IRA POOL
Sons of the American Revolution,
Iowa State Historical Society
EDWIN WELCH BURCH
First President Iowa Baptist Brother-
hood
iCrrtturky
CHARLES ALEXANDER KEITH, B. A.
OXON.
History and Civics, East Kentucky
Normal School
MRS. WILLIAM H. THOMPSON
Vice-President General, National So-
ciety Daughters of the American
Revolution
Miss MARY NATHALIE BALDY
fflaiur
Miss NELLIE WOODBURY JORDAN
Instructor in History, State Normal
MRS. EDWARD EDES SHEAD
HUGH MACLELLAN SOUTHGATE, B. S.
American Institute Electrical Engi-
neers
JOHN GLENN COOK
ALPHONZO BENJAMIN BOWERS, C. E.
President Atlantic Harbor Railroad
Company
HENRY Louis STICK, M. D.
Superintendent Hospital Cottages for
Children, Baldwinsville
J. VAUGHAN DENNETT
New England Historical and Genea-
logical Society
MRS. Louis PRANG
President Roxbury Civic Club
MRS. SARAH BOWMAN VAN NESS
Honorary Life Regent, Lexington,
Daughters of the American Revolu-
tion
Miss CAROLINE BORDEN
Trustee American College, Constan-
tinople
[6]
GRAND COUNCIL OF THE VICE-PRESIDENTS
MRS. CARL F. KAUFMAN
FRANK REED KIM BALL
Society of Colonial Wars, Sons of the
American Revolution
iflidmum
FREDERICK W. MAIN, M. D.
Jackson Chamber of Commerce
MRS. JAMES H. CAMPBELL
State President, United States Daugh-
ters of 1812
MRS. FORDYCE HUNTINGTON ROGERS
Ex-Dean Women, Olivet College
MRS. FREDERICK BECKWITH STEVENS
ifliminuitii
MRS. MARY ELIZABETH BUCKNUM
Minneapolis Chapter, Daughters of
the American Revolution
Miss LUELLA AGNES OWEN
Fellow American Association for the
Advancement of Science and Amer-
ican Geographical Society
Xrhraiiku
T. J. FlTZPATRICK, M. S.
Fellow American Association for the
Advancement of Science
MRS. ERASTUS GAYLORD PUTNAM
Honorary Vice-President General,
National Society Daughters of the
American Revolution
ELEANOR HAINES, M. D.
Life-Member, New Jersey Historical
Society
MRS. EX-GOVERNOR JOSEPH DORSETT
BEDLE
Past President New Jersey Colonial
Dames
MRS. ORVILLE T. WARING
New Jersey Colonial Dames, New
Jersey Historical Society*
MRS. RUTH E. FAIRCHILD
Life-Member Daughters of the Amer-
ican Revolution, Member New Jer-
sey Colonial Dames, Life-Member
New Jersey Historical Society
MRS. JAMES E. POPE
fflrxirn
HON. L. BRADFORD PRINCE, LL. D.
Ex-Governor, President Historical So-
ciety of New Mexico
Nntt fork
ARCHER M. HUNTINGTON
President Hispanic Society of America
REVEREND GEORGE CLARKE HOUGHTON,
D. D.
Society of Colonial Wars, Sons of the
Revolution
CHARLES JACKSON NORTH
Life-Member Buffalo Historical So-
ciety
HENRY E. HUNTINGTON
President Los Angeles Railway Cor-
poration
JOSEPH A. MCALEENAN
Associate Member Explorers' Club
FRANK JOSEF Louis WOUTERS
President Oleogravure Co., Inc.
OTTO MARC EIDLITZ
MRS. BENJAMIN SILLIMAN CHURCH
Incorporator and Past Vice-President
Colonial Dames, New York
[7]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
MRS. FREDERICK F. THOMPSON
Vice-President George Washington
Memorial Association
MRS. HENRY FAIRFIELD OSBORN
Philanthropist, Trustee Barnard Col-
lege
MRS. JOHN CARSTENSEN
MRS. ALICE B. TWEEDY
National Society Daughters of the
American Revolution
MRS. MELVILLE AUGUSTUS JOHNSON
Director Onondaga County Historical
Association
MRS. CORNELIA E. S. HOLLEY
Chapin Association
MRS. HENRY A. STRONG
Life-Member George Washington
Memorial Association
Miss MAY OSBORNE
National Society Daughters of the
American Revolution
MRS. VIOLA A. BROMLEY
Fort Greene Chapter, Daughters of
the American Revolution
MRS. W. B. SYLVESTER
Founder and Honorary Regent, Mon-
roe Chapter, Daughters of the
American Revolution
MRS. NELLIS MARATHON RICH
National Society Founders and Pa-
triots of America
MRS. J. HULL BROWNING
MRS. WILLIAM WARD DAKE
Miss MARGARET A. JACKSON
G. ALFRED LAWRENCE, M. D., PH. D.
New York Academy of Medicine,
Sons of the American Revolution
Miss LUCILE THORNTON
CHARLES FREDERICK QUINCY
Chairman, Executive Committee,
American Forestry Association
iakota
C. HERSCHEL KOYL, PH. D.
Fellow Johns Hopkins University
HONORABLE B. F. WIRT
President Equity Savings and Loan
Company
S. O. RICHARDSON, JR.
Vice-President Libbey Glass Company
MRS. OBED J. WILSON
Life-Member George Washington
Memorial Association
MRS. HOWARD JONES
Life-Member Ohio Archaeological and
Historical Society
MRS. JOHN GATES
Life- Member George Washington
Memorial Association
MRS. JOHN SANBORN CONNER
Life-Member George Washington
Memorial Association
Miss MARIE A. HIBBARD
Daughters of the American Revolu-
tion, Toledo Art Museum Associa-
tion
MRS. GUSSIE DEBENATH OGDEN
Life-Member Mercantile Library, Cin-
cinnati
FREDERICK J. TRUMPOUR
W. B. CARPENTER, M. D.
Sons of the American Revolution,
Vice-President Columbus Mutual
Life Insurance Company
B. F. STRECKER
President The Citizens National Bank
of Marietta
[8]
GRAND COUNCIL OF THK VICE-PRESIDENTS
(Drrgon
DAVID N. MOSESSOHN
Lawyer, Publisher and Editor The
Oregon Country
prmtmjluama
FRANCIS AUGUSTUS LOVELAND
President Chrome and Beck Tanning
Companies
PERCEVAL K. GABLE
JOSEPH J. DESMOND
President Corry Citizens' National
Bank
GEORGE T. BUSH
Life-Member Sons of the Revolution
MRS. FREDERIC PICKETT
Miss MARY MEILY
lUfOO? jhilauft
ALFRED TUCKERMAN, PH. D.
American Association for the Ad-
vancement of Science
Virginia
MRS. BALDWIN DAY SPILMAN
Past Vice-President General,
tional Society Daughters of the
American Revolution
MRS. LEVIN THOMAS CARTWRIGHT
Virginia Historical Society, Daugh-
ters of the American Revolution,
United Daughters of the Confed-
eracy
p0t Virginia
C. M. BOGER, M. D.
Ex-President International Hahne-
mann Association
MAJOR WILLIAM H. COBB
Director General, Knights of Wash-
ington
mtaronain
MRS. ANDREW M. JOYS
Honorary Life-President. Wisconsin
Chapter, Daughters of Founders
and Patriots of America
EDWIN MONTGOMERY BAILEY
MRS. FRANCES A. BAKER DUNNING
Na- MRS. ALFRED B. SCOTT
Urmbrra of % fctatr Aoniaorg Soarua
Colorado
MRS. PHILLIPS M. CHASE
Society of Colonial Dames
Jouta
MRS. SHERMAN IRA POOL
State Historian, Iowa, Daughters of
the American Revolution
iflaruktuii
JOHN GLENN COOK
American Association for the Ad-
vancement of Science
ARTHUR F. ESTABROOK
American Academy of Political and
Social Science
CHARLES LYMAN NEWHALL
George Washington Memorial As-
sociation
fork
HONORABLE GEORGE D. EMERSON
Ex-Member New York State Senate
HENRY PARSONS
Military Order of the Loyal Legion
[9]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
MRS. FRANK FOWLER Dow
Regent Irondequoit Chapter Daugh- MRS. CHARLES EDMUND LONGLEY
ters of the American Revolution State Regent, Rhode Island, Daugh-
MRS. GEORGE GEDNEY SANDS ters of the American Revolution
MRS. GEORGE C. CLAUSEN _,
(Oh in MRS. EDWARD ROTAN
FRANK SERVIS MASTEN Daughters of the American Revolution
[10]
of Sttrorporation of
National If tatoriral
Jnrorporatri unorr % Kama of tip itatrtrt nf (Bolumbta
at Wafiiytngton, on tip 8Jmrtttg-&iJrti? Bag of April. In tip
of <0ur Horo, Ntnrtwn funorrfc and JTifton, - Jfar
of Promoting ^urtoriral KnomUoge and
ana tljr (rare of EmhtrniwnrBH among
iNatlona"
| HE NAME by which the Society is to be
known is "The National Historical So-
ciety."
The Society is to continue in perpe-
tuity.
The particular business and objects of
the Society will be:
(a) To discover, procure, preserve, and perpetuate
whatever relates to History, the History of the Western
Hemisphere, the History of the United States of America
and their possessions, and the History of families.
(b) To inculcate and bulwark patriotism, in no par-
tisan, sectional, nor narrowly national sense, but in recog-
nition of man's high obligation toward civic righteousness,
believing that human governments are divinely ordained
to bear the sword and exercise police duty for good against
evil, and not for evil against good, and recognizing, as be-
tween peoples and peoples, that " God has made of one
blood all nations of men."
(c) To provide a national and international patri-
otic clearing-house and historical exchange, promoting by
suitable means helpful forms of communication and co-
operation between all historical organizations, patriotic or-
ders, and kindred societies, local, state, national, and inter-
national, that the usefulness of all may be increased and
their benefits extended toward education and patriotism.
[in
(d) To promote the work of preserving historic
landmarks and marking historic sites.
(e) To encourage the use of historical themes and
the expression of patriotism in the arts.
(/) In the furtherance of the objects and purposes
of the Society, and not as a commercial business, to acquire
The Journal of American History, and to publish the same
as the official organ of the Society, and to publish or pro-
mote the publication of whatever else may seem advisable
in furtherance of the objects of the Society.
(g) To authorize the organization of members of
the Society, resident in given localities, into associated
branch societies, or chapters of the parent Society, and to
promote by all other suitable means the purpose, objects,
and work of the Society.
The Membership body of The National Historical
Society consists of
(1) Original Founders, contributing five dollars
each to the Founders' Fund, thus enrolling as pioneer
builders of a great National Institution ;
(2) Original State Advisory Board Founders, con-
tributing twenty-five dollars each to the Founders' Fund,
from whom are elected the Members of the State Advisory
Boards ;
(3) Original Life-Member Founders, contributing
one hundred dollars each to the Founders' Fund, from
whom are elected for life the members of the Grand Coun-
cil of the Vice-Presidents ;
(4) Patrons, who contribute one thousand dollars
to further the work of the Society ;
(5) Annual Members, who pay two dollars, annual
dues, receiving The Journal of American History.
(6) Sustaining Members, who contribute five dol-
lars, annual dues, receiving The Journal of American
History.
(7) Sustaining Life-Members, who contribute one
hundred dollars annually.
(8) Sustaining Contributors, who contribute an-
nually any sum between five dollars and one hundred
dollars.
[12]
abb of
ROYAL ARMS OF ITALY. ENGRAVING IN COLORS FROM A
PAINTING Front Cover
TITLE-PAGE DESIGN 3
BOARD OF EDITORIAL DIRECTORS AND OFFICIAL
ORGANIZATION 5
ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF THE NATIONAL
HISTORICAL SOCIETY 11
VICTOR EMANUEL III, KING OF ITALY. ENGRAVING
PROM A PHOTOGRAPH BY THE INTERNATIONAL FILM SER-
VICE 17
ARMANDO DIAZ, COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF OF THE
ARMIES OF ITALY. ENGRAVING 18
VITTORIO EMANUELE ORLANDO, PREMIER OF
ITALY. ENGRAVING 19
HER MAJESTY, THE QUEEN OF ITALY. ENGRAVING .... 20
FOREWORD BY THE EDITOR-IN-CHIEF 21
THE PURITY OF PURPOSE OF ITALY. THE REASONS
FOR ITALY'S ATTITUDE, AT FIRST A NEUTRAL AND THEN A
BELLIGERENT His Excellency, Count Macchi di Cellere,
Italian Ambassador to the United States 26
ITALY'S ARMY IN THE WORLD WAR. A SHORT STATE-
MENT ON AN IMMENSE WORK. Major-General Emilio Gug-
lielmotti, Military Attache to the Royal Italian Embassy at
Washington 33
THE ACTIVE SILENCE OF THE ITALIAN NAVY-
Rear- Admiral Count Massimiliano Lovatelli, Naval Attache
to the Royal Italian Embassy at Washington 35
AN INFANTRY ATTACK FROM THE TRENCHES AT
SANTA CATERINA. FROM A PAINTING BY SARTORIO.
ENGRAVING
HIS EXCELLENCY, COUNT VINCENZO MACCHI DI
CELLERE, ITALIAN AMBASSADOR TO THE
UNITED STATES. FROM A PHOTOGRAPH BY EDMONSTON,
WASHINGTON, D. C. ENGRAVING 38
[13]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
HER EXCELLENCY, COUNTESS DOLORES MACCHI DI
CELLERE, WIFE OF THE ITALIAN AMBASSADOR
TO THE UNITED STATES. FROM A PHOTOGRAPH BY
EDMONSTON, WASHINGTON, D. C. ENGRAVING 39
NAVY GUNS AT PUNTA SDOBBA. FROM A PAINTING BY
SARTORIO. ENGRAVING 40
THE FIGHTING STRENGTH OF THE ITALIAN SOL-
DIER. VALOR AND POWERS OF ENDURANCE UNSURPASSED
BY CAESAR'S LEGIONS The Honorable Salvatore A. Cotillo,
New York State Senator 41
THE OVERTHROW OF AUSTRIA Captain Alessandro
Sapelli, former Governor of Benadir, one of Italy's Colonies
in Africa 47
THE VOICE OF A SOLDIER FROM CAPODISTRIA-
Colonel Ugo Pizzarello 52
DUGOUTS ON THE CARSO. FROM A PAINTING BY SAR-
TORIO. ENGRAVING 57
DISTANT VIEW OF TRIESTE FROM HILL " 121 BIS."
FROM A PAINTING BY SARTORIO. ENGRAVING 58
BARRACKS AT BONETI ON THE CARSO. FROM A PAINT-
ING BY SARTORIO. ENGRAVING 59
ITALIAN WOMEN ERECTING BARBED-WIRE ENTAN-
GLEMENTS. ENGRAVING 60
ITALIAN WOMEN DIGGING SECOND LINE TRENCHES,
WHILE THE MEN WERE FIGHTING IN THE FIRST
LINE. ENRGAVING 60
THE WAR SERVCE OF ITALIAN WOMEN Amy A.
Bernardy, Litt. D., Universities of Rome and Florence 61
FIUME Doctor Gino Antoni, Vice-Mayor of Fiume and Mem-
ber of the National Council of the City 71
TRIESTE Doctor Giorgio Pitacco, Municipal Councillor of
Trieste ; former Deputy to the Austrian Parliament 74
AN ITALIAN WAR LOAN POSTER. FROM A DRAWING BY
M. BORGONI. ENGRAVING 77
THE PEOPLE OF LISSA WELCOMING FROM THE PIER
THE ARRIVAL OF THE ITALIAN SAILORS, NO-
VEMBER 4, 1918. ENGRAVING 78
[14]
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITALIAN SAILORS LANDING AT LISSA, NOVEMBER
4, 1918. ENGRAVING 79
LIME FURNACE AT THE MOUTH OF THE TIMAVO
RIVER. FROM A PAINTING BY SARTORIO. ENGRAVING... 80
ITALY REVEALED. A POEM ~ Frank Allaben 81
LINCOLN'S RECOGNITION OF ITALY'S FRIENDSHIP
AND HIS PRAYER FOR THE FULFILMENT OF
ITALY'S ASPIRATIONS. FROM A LETTER, WRITTEN ON
JULY 23, 1864, BY PRESIDENT LINCOLN TO COMMANDER
BERTINATTI, ITALIAN ENVOY EXTRAORDINARY 112
THE TOWN HALL OF CAPODISTRIA. ENGRAVING 113
ON THE " GRAPPA." ONE OF THE MOST BITTERLY CON-
TESTED SECTORS OF THE ITALIAN FRONT. ENGRAVING 114
ITALIAN " ARDITTI " OPERATING A MACHINE GUN.
ENGRAVING 114
FIUME. ENGRAVING 115
THE FLOTILLA COMMANDED BY ADMIRAL MIRA-
BELLO APPROACHING LISSA. ENGRAVING 115
WELCOMING THE KING OF ITALY ON HIS ARRIVAL
AT TRIESTE. ENGRAVING 116
ARRIVAL OF HIS MAJESTY, THE KING OF ITALY, AT
TRIESTE, NOVEMBER 10, 1918. ENGRAVING 116
ITALY'S GREAT WORK IN ALBANIA -- Brigadier-General
George P. Scriven, U. S. A., Military Observer in Albania. . 117
DALMATIA Doctor Roberto Ghiglianovitch, Member of the
Dalmatian Diet 122
TO AMERICA IN ARMS. A FREE RENDERING, BY JOHN R.
SLATER, OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER, OF THE LATTER
PART OF THE ELOQUENT ODE TO AMERICA COMPOSED BY
D'ANNUNZIO FOR ITALY'S CELEBRATION OF AMERICA'S IN-
DEPENDENCE DAY, 1918 Gabriele d'Annunzio 126
D'ANNUNZIO'S SQUADRON OVER VIENNA Lieu-
tenant Stefano d'Amico, Member of the Italian Military Mis-
sion for Aeronautics to the United States 129
THE PILOTS OF THE SQUADRON " SERENISSIMA,"
WITH THEIR CAPTAIN, D'ANNUNZIO, IN THE
CENTRE. ENGRAVING 133
[15]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
THE SQUADRON " SERENISSIMA " PASSING OVER
NOTABLE BUILDINGS OF VIENNA. ENGRAVING. . . 133
GABRIELE D'ANNUNZIO'S FLIGHT OVER VIENNA.
THE SQUADRON'S SHOWER OF LEAFLETS. ENGRAVING 134
PEAKS OF THE ADAMELLO GROUP IN THE ALPS
. SCENE OF GALLANT FIGHTING UNDER DIFFICULTIES BY THE
ALPINI TROOPS. ENGRAVING 135
IN VENETIA ~ END OF THE BRENTA VALLEY. EN-
GRAVING 136
MY VISIT WITH THE QUEEN OF ITALY Mary Hatch
Willard, Founder of the National Surgical Dressings Com-
mittee, the French Comfort Packets Committee, and
America's Allies Co-operative Committee 137
ITALY'S WAR-PLANES Captain Giuseppe Bevione, Mem-
ber of the Italian Parliament; Chief of the Italian Military
Mission for Aeronautics 147
VERDI'S FORECAST OF THE WORLD WAR. THE GREAT
ITALIAN COMPOSER, MOURNING THE HUN INVASION OF
FRANCE IN 1870, PREDICTED WAR BETWEEN ITALY AND
GERMANY 151
ARISTIDE SARTORIO, THE PAINTER OF ITALY, AT
WAR. IN THIS ITALY NUMBER OF THE JOURNAL OF
AMERICAN HISTORY ARE REPRODUCED Six OF THE SUPERB
WAR SCENES BY THIS SPLENDID ARTIST AND VALIANT
SOLDIER Ettore Cadorin 153
FRIENDS OF ITALY. MEMBERS OF THE NATIONAL HISTORI-
CAL SOCIETY AND OTHERS WHO HAVE GENEROUSLY CON-
TRIBUTED TOWARD SPECIAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE ITALY
NUMBER OF THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY 155
[16]
VICTOK KMAXTKL III. K1X<; OF ITALY
From a photograph by the lutcriiiitidiiul Film Svrvlc*
[17]
ARMANDO DIAZ, COMMANDKU-IN-CHIKK OF THE AKMIKS OF ITALY
. .
VITTOKlo KMAM-KLK UKLAMMi. 1'KKMIKH OF ITALY
[19]
II10U MA.IKSTV. Till-; (JI'KKX OK ITALY
[20]
VOLUME XIII
NINETEEN NINETEEN
NUMBER 1
FIRST QUARTER
bg tty
HIS SPECIAL ITALY NUMBER of THE JOURNAL
OF AMERICAN HISTORY appears at a moment pecu-
liarly opportune for Italy and America. All of its
contents except this Foreword was at the point of
publication before President Wilson issued his state-
ment of April 23 concerning Italy which led to the
Italian Delegation's dramatic withdrawal from the
Peace Conference at Paris. Now, happily, as we go to press with this
final word of explanation, the world is informed that Premier Orlando
and Baron Sonnino are on their way back to Paris at the special solici-
tation of President Wilson, Mr. Lloyd George, and Mr. Clemenceau,
with the understanding that the justice of Italy's attitude toward
Fiume and Dalmatia will be recognized and the Treaty of Peace and
League of Nations consummated.
By good fortune, this magazine appears just when its readers seek
the information here presented, which not alone gives us a more ade-
[21]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
quate sense of the great and indispensable part played by Italy in
winning the War, but also enables us to understand better the quench-
less ardor of the Italians of Fiume and Dalmatia for the realization of
their long dream of reunion with Italy.
This Italian Number grew out of a Resolution of the Board of
Directors of The National Historical Society, July 13, 1918, recom-
mending and authorizing such a Number of the Society's magazine,
with the special view of setting forth " Italy's ideals, hopes, and con-
victions," so as to " promote the patriotic education of the people of
the United States, . . . deepen our friendship with Italy, . . .
prepare a sympathetic understanding for the co-operation of the
United States and Italy in a righteous League of Nations at the close
of the War, . . . and . . . enlighten America concerning
the peace settlement necessary to liberate all the Italian peoples of
Europe and secure the just interests of Italy in the Adriatic."
In preparing its France and Great Britain Numbers of THE
JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY, this Society was greatly indebted
for special information and editorial co-operation to their Excellencies,
the French and British Ambassadors to the United States; and, in
response to the Society's Resolution and the invitation of THE JOUR-
NAL'S editors, his Excellency, Count Macchi di Cellere, Italian Ambas-
sador to the United States, very generously contributed to the pages of
this Number, while, through his courtesy, much material was obtained
from Italy for this special purpose. To his Excellency I wish to
express here the gratitude of the editors of THE JOURNAL OF AMER-
ICAN HISTORY and of the officers and members of The National His-
torical Society. I also wish to convey to Mr. Fernando Cuniberti of
the Royal Italian Embassy our grateful appreciation of his devoted
labors in acting as Special Editor of this issue.
Here, too, I tender our thanks to the " Friends of Italy," members
of The National Historical Society and others, who have generously
contributed to a special fund for free distribution of the Italy Number.
The added enlightenment concerning Italy's aspirations which we
obtained in connection with the preparation of this Number of THE
JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY increased our fear- lest a grave mis-
take be made at Paris in rejecting Italy's just recognition of her
responsibilities toward her people in the Irredenta. Accordingly, the
Society's Executive Committee authorized the sending of an appeal to
President Wilson at Paris, and the following letter was cabled to the
President on the evening of Mav 2, 1919:
[22]
FOREWORD BY THE EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
Dear Mr. President:
May we not frankly lay before you the reason why we are greatly troubled in conscience
by the proposed disposition of Fiume by the Peace Conference? We are moved to do this
because we regard the establishment of a League of Nations to maintain peace through
international righteousness as a great advance in human government and feel profound
gratitude for your remarkable labors in behalf of such a League. We have also had full
fellowship with the principles defined by you during the War including the so-called
Fourteen Points, for we have believed that you rested them all on the great American
principle that " government derives its just powers from the consent of the governed."
Can you wonder at our surprise, therefore, after carefully studying your statement of
April 23, dealing with the Italian- Jugoslav dispute, to find that this great American principle
is utterly set aside in the proposed disposition of Fiume, a city of 46,000 inhabitants?
We agree perfectly with the general principles laid down in your statement of April 23 ;
and we also agree that the principles you proposed for an armistice with Germany, and which
Germany and our Allies accepted, should also prevail in the settlement of the questions of
the Adriatic. But was not the principle of "the consent of the governed" fundamental in
your entire conception of a just armistice and a just peace?
How comes it then that in all your references to Fiume in your statement of April 23
you do not so much as refer to the desire of the population of that city to determine its own
allegiance, but treat that large community as if it were a pawn to be delivered over either to
Italy or the Jugoslavs as a matter of commercial convenience?
Fiume is a commonwealth of nearly 50,000 people, with those of Italian blood and
aspirations overwhelmingly in the majority. These people passionately refuse to be handed
over against their will to any power in the world, and question the right and title of the
Peace Conference at Paris or of any combination of nations to hand them over; and in this,
when the situation is understood, they will have, the full sympathy and admiration of all
Americans and, we believe, of all Englishmen. Certain it is that the right of the self-
disposal of all civilized political communities is the foundation-stone of the Anglo-Saxon
conception of liberty and justice.
We have taken pains to obtain the latest reliable information concerning Fiume, and find
that, according to the census of last December, founded upon the official vital statistics of
that city, it then had a total civil population of 46,264. We call your attention to the fact
that, according to the first Census of the United States, Vermont had a population of only
25,000 in 1770, Delaware had the same. Georgia had 26,000, Maine had 34.000, and Rhode
Island 55,000. The population of Rhode Island had fallen to 52,000 in 1780, in which year
Vermont had 40,000 inhabitants, Delaware 37,000, Georgia 55,000, and Maine 55.000.
In other words, when these American colonies disposed of themselves in our Revolution-
ary period, and denied the right either of Great Britain or of any of their fellow-colonies to
dispose of them, they were all little commonwealths with populations considerably less or
not much greater than that of Fiume. Our American forefathers in one colony did not
dream of interfering with the self-disposition of the people of these little commonwealths,
either at the time of the Revolution or of the adoption of the American Constitution. We
hold that our fathers were right in this, and no American can deny the same right to the city
of Fiume, over 62% of whose inhabitants are Italian, of a race whose cities were republics
long before republican institutions were known among Anglo-Saxons.
Dear Mr. President, you must pardon us for feeling distressed in finding the assertion
toward the close of your statement of April 23 that " interests are not now in question, but
the rights of peoples." For in the preceding part of your statement you discuss Fiume in a
paragraph which refers only to the commercial interests of Hungary, Bohemia, Roumania,
and the Jugoslavs, without the faintest allusion to the inalienable rights of the people of
Fiume.
The Italian population of Fiume is certainly as enterprising, commercially, as the less
developed Jugoslavs. These Italians would scarcely be human if they did not wish to develop
their city commercially and afford an outlet for all the commerce which Hungary, Bohemia,
and Jugoslavia can offer them. But is it comprehensible how the commerce of Hungary,
Bohemia, and Roumania, through Fiume, could be better served by taking its control out
of the majority-population of the city, consisting of enterprising Italians, and placing it in
the hands of a small minority of Jugoslavs? In December, 1918, the Italians in Fiume were
28,911, while the Croats were only 9.092. the Slovenes 1,674, and the Serbians 161.
[23]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
You mention Hungary, Bohemia, Roumania, and Jugoslavia. Hungary alone seems
dependent on Fiume. We hear little of Roumanian business at Fiume, while Bohemia can
use a nearer port, Trieste. But how are the commercial interests of Hungary and Bohemia
to be served by Fiume better under the flag of Jugoslavia, an experimental nation not yet on
its feet whose elements are now in civil war, than under the flag of Italy, an established
democracy highly organized commercially?
And are not the Jugoslavs themselves independent of Fiume, being bountifully supplied
with Adriatic ports under the Treaty of London? In the long stretch of coast assigned them
from Fiume nearly to Zara have they not the excellent ports of Buccari and Porto Re (near
Fiume), Cirquenizza, Novi, Segna and Carlopago? And on the still longer coast assigned
to them south of Sebenico have they not Trau, Spalato, Ragusa and Cattaro?
All these are largely Italian. Is it not tragedy enough to abandon these Italians to a
doubtful experiment in human government without the unnecessary martyrdom of Fiume?
The lament of Spalato is enough. Do not burden our conscience with the reproaches ofj
Fiume.
Inasmuch as the major population of Fiume passionately claims its inalienable right to
choose its own flag and governmental allegiance; and since this is a right which no other
free people can question for a moment ; and since the people of Fiume, threatened with a
tyrannical disposition of their destinies by outsiders, have appealed to their blood-kinsmen of
the Italian nation, we believe, Mr. President, that it would be cowardly and dishonorable
for the Italian Government and the Italian people not to respond to this appeal in the way
that they have done.
Under the circumstances, we do not see how the Italian delegates to the Peace Conference
could dp less than withdraw with dignity, as they have done, so as to obtain a referendum
from Fiume and Italy concerning the vital issues involved. But we have been very much
encouraged by the reasonableness of the statement of Premier Orlando to the Italian
Parliament and his evident great care to present your views accurately and to emphasize your
sympathy with the Italian people and your earnest desire for some settlement consistent with
Italy's natural desire to preserve the liberation of Fiume.
In view of the great exercise of conscience over this matter throughout the world, if
now the right of Fiume to dispose of herself be conceded on the ground of the fundamental
Anglo-Saxon principle of " the consent of the governed," we believe the world can confidently
count upon the gratitude and sense of honor of the Italians of Fiume and all Italy to deal
with absolute justice with the rights of Hungary, Bohemia, Roumania, and Jugoslavia, at
the port of Fiume. If we cannot trust the Italians as trustees of such rights, whom can we
trust? Are the Hungarians, the Bohemians, the Roumanians, and the Jugoslavs more
trustworthy?
The point of view of this letter can be boiled down to one single proposition : we cannot
concede either to Italy or to Jugoslavia the right to dispose of Fiume against its will, and
can much less concede such a right to more remote nations. We acknowledge the right of
Fiume to dispose of itself.
We add further that if the new-born League of Nations undertakes at the outset to
dispose tyrannically of communities like Fiume the League will find itself hopelessly arrayed
against the most enlightened conscience in the world at the present time. Neither this
League nor any other League can bind eternal wrong upon the conscience of mankind. On
the other hand, the world's hope from the League is a thing too precious to jeopardize by
mistakes of policy so grave and so fundamental.
We feel sure that you will not misunderstand the spirit which moves our protest ; and
we wish to close with the repeated expression of our profound gratitude to you and all your
associates at Paris for your devoted efforts to achieve the almost impossible in behalf of
humanity.
Very respectfully,
FRANK ALLABEN, President
DUDLEY BUTLER, Treasurer
MABEL T. R. WASHBURN, Secretary
Executive Committee of
The National Historical Society
37 West 39th Street, New York
May 2. 1919
[24]
FOREWORD BY THE EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
With great relief, which we believe is shared by a large part of
the world, we learned from the Paris dispatches in the newspapers of
May 5th that President Wilson had taken the initiative and, on the
preceding day, with Mr. Lloyd George and Mr. Clemenceau, had
cordially solicited the return to Paris of the Italian Peace Delegates.
These dispatches indicate that the London agreement with Italy con-
cerning Dalmatia will be substantially carried out, while Fiume will
be permitted to unite with her motherland after a possible brief inter-
regnum of autonomy, under Italy as mandatory, during which the
Jugoslavs will be given a commercial outlet through Fiume pending a
further improvement of one of their own Dalmatian ports under
supervision of the League of Nations.
No one can comprehend the point-of-view of Italy, nor the agony
of the Italians in the Irredenta, at the thought of their abandonment
to the tender mercies of the Jugoslavs, unless he is familiar with the
history of the Irredenta since 1866. Prior to that date, Austria-
Hungary was engaged in a savage attempt to Germanize the Italians
of the Irredenta. Thousands were persecuted incredibly, and hun-
dreds were hanged and otherwise martyred. No outsider, even if
familiar with the facts, can feel them with the everliving horror which
haunts the Italian heart.
Finding that her cruelties had made it absolutely impossible to
Germanize the Italians, from about 1860 Austria-Hungary sought to
destroy the Italian spirit by the Slavonization of the Italians of the
Irredenta, and, in the awful outrages of this process, the Croats and
Slovenes have been Austria-Hungary's ready tools and greedy hands,
with their fingers ever at the Italian throat. These Slavs have had
for their battle-cry, U moru Taliansky - ''' Into the sea with the
Italians ! " This is what is behind the passionate resolution of the
long-persecuted people of Fiume to die rather than submit to be sold
into the hands of their most deadly foes.
Frank Allaben.
[25]
fttritg nf JIurjniH? of
BY
HIS EXCELLENCY, COUNT MACCHI DI CELLERE
Italian Ambassador to the United States
KfaaottH fur Jtalg'0 Attttuto, at 3Ftrat a Nrutral
and (Uirn a Sr Uujrrrnt
HE Allies are joint partners against the forces of armed
brutality. It is of the highest importance that we
should all appreciate to the full the unselfishness and
purity of purpose of each of our associates. The
magnificent and unselfish stand which the United
States has taken for the preservation of democracy by
its entry into war is fully realized by my nation. And
it is with the hope that I may make clear and distinct the unselfishness
and purity of purpose of Italy that I undertake in a few words to recall
her situation. Italy's position in the war has been perverted into one
of faithlessness by a clever propaganda of our common enemy; but,
fortunately, the great President and the people of the United States
have come to recognize that this accusation is hideously false. This
German propaganda has centered around two points : That we were
traitors to the Triple Alliance; that we entered the war only for
selfish ends.
How far from justified are these two accusations, with all the
consequences that follow them, you know. I will, however, discuss
them from the Italian point of view. I could easily disregard the
accusation of treason made by our enemies against us. The word
treason is unknown to Italy in principle and in fact, and only Teutonic
mentality could apply it to us. Italy did not betray her former allies.
She was brutally and repeatedly betrayed by them. One needs merely
[26]
THE PURITY OF PURPOSE OF ITALY
to consider the spirit and the wording of the treaty of the Triple
Alliance to be at once convinced of the truth of my statement. Italy
joined the Austro-German combination at a period when her national
existence had hardly begun. Unable to withstand the dangers of
isolation, Italy became a party to the treaty, but stipulated that the
Alliance should be purely defensive and that no step whatever should
be taken by any of the signatories without previous consultation with
the others.
Italy kept her word to the last. How the Teutonic powers kept
theirs is demonstrated by their sending their ultimatum to Serbia
without letting Italy know that they were even contemplating such
a tremendous step. They kept Italy in the dark because they knew
by experience that Italy would oppose their plans of aggression against
Serbia or any other nation, and they realized that if their plans had
been known in time the war they wanted to provoke and did provoke
would not have been possible. Italy had stood by Serbia when, after
Austria's annexation of the Serbian provinces of Bosnia-Herzegovina,
the Central Powers were preparing new aggressions in the Balkans
and were looking for pretexts which Italy's attitude always forestalled.
Knowing that Italy would never consent to their criminal plans, Ger-
many and Austria prepared in secret. When they considered them-
selves ready, they broke the peace of the world. What Italy's attitude
would have been if she had known what the Central Powers were
preparing is demonstrated by the efforts she made with her noble and
traditional friend, England, to prevent a war which everybody knew
would be the ruin of Europe and would involve the whole world. Our
efforts were as vain as were those of England, because the crimes
which the Central Powers were plotting against humanity and
civilization had been determined upon.
Italy was betrayed by her former allies in 1908, when Austria
with the knowledge and open support of Germany annexed Bosnia-
Herzegovina; she was betrayed again during her war with Turkey
in 1912, when Austria threatened instant war if Italy should attack
Turkey at Prevesa, and when Germany sent her officers and men to
lead the Turks and the Arabs against the Italian soldiers; she was
betrayed once more in 1914, when Germany and Austria struck with-
out consulting her. Italy did the only thing she could possibly do at
the time she refused to join them, and at once declared her neutrality.
The history of Italy, even in its darkest periods, abounds in
instances of nobility and greatness. The Italian nation could not have
[27]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
become a party to a crime against humanity a crime so cunningly
premeditated that the most repulsive of crimes suffer in comparison.
The Teutonic assault on Serbia had released Italy from any obli-
gation under the Triple Alliance an assault which was only the con-
summation of a series of crimes all preparatory to the same end, and
committed in full view of the civilized world, which nevertheless could
not be brought to realize what was about to happen.
We are all paying dearly now for our blind faith that no nation
would dare to break a peace which the world had expended so much
to secure.
Let me say that in the bloody sacrifices civilization is making to
overthrow barbarism once for all, Italy is second to none.
But then (to take up the second point of my argument against the
subtle Teutonic propaganda) why did Italy merely declare her neu-
trality instead of immediately taking up arms and joining the Entente
in August, 1914? All who follow the course of international affairs
appreciate the fact that in 1914 Italy was just emerging from a war
with Turkey in which she had suffered atrociously as a result of
Turkish cruelty and Austro-German treason.
I have already referred to the episode of Prevesa and the fact
established by official documents that German officers and men took
part on the Turkish side in the Italo-Turkish war. Our military stores
were exhausted, our artillery was reduced to nothing, our armies had
been largely disbanded, and only a very small number of them remained
under arms. The result to the Allies of an immediate Italian partici-
pation in the war, under these conditions, is easily seen. Italy would
have been overrun at once, put out of business altogether, and lost to
the cause of the Allies probably forever certainly for the duration
of this war.
However, the mere declaration of neutrality was in itself a proof
that Italy had made her decision she would not be on the side of the
aggressors. But it meant far more; it meant that heroic France,
reassured about our attitude, could, as she did, immediately withdraw
all of her soldiers from the Italian frontier and send them to immortal-
ize themselves at the Marne. Thus Italy, by making possible the
victorious defense of Paris, contributed in saving the war for the
Allies.
The Central Powers understood what Italian neutrality meant,
and began a work of corruption and intrigue which did not, however,
alter the course of events. Italy had not been ready when the voice of
[28]
THE PURITY OF PURPOSE OF ITALY
history called her to be true to her immemorial traditions of love for
liberty and justice; but she prepared with all speed to make her par-
ticipation in the war of material advantage. You all know of what
technical importance has been Italy's contribution to the war, in the
perfecting of trench, mountain, and heavy artillery, in the wonderful
evolution of the aeroplane, in the development of warfare among the
clouds.
But let me recall to your minds the immediate practical effects of
Italy's entrance into the struggle.
Russia was being rapidly driven back, apparently without any
hope of recovering from the hammering blows of the Austro-German
forces. Only a diversion, and a powerful one, could prevent a crush-
ing disaster to the Allies. Italy undertook the task of creating such
a diversion. She declared war on Austria, crossed old iniquitous
boundaries imposed upon her by Austria and Germany in 1866, and
forced the instant transfer of all available Austrian forces from the
Eastern theatre of the war to the Italian front. Italy had created the
necessary diversion and Russia was saved for her victories of a few
months later.
For two and a half years Austria had been kept on the verge of
disaster by the bravery of a country that has been paying for her lack
of artillery, ammunition, fuel, and food with the purest blood of
her sons.
Then, in October, 1917, owing to a combination of circumstances
now known to all, Teutonic trickery and violence got the better of us.
Our country was invaded, our army brought near destruction, our
monuments razed with barbaric thoroughness, our women and children
martyred. For the moment it seemed that we were lost, not alone to
the cause of the Allies, but even to our own traditions. Thank God
that impression proved false ! Never was Italy so great as on the day
she realized her danger and transformed what appeared to be one of
the greatest defeats known in military annals into a victorious rally of
all her forces against the invader. The day will come when we shall
hear the name of the Piave mentioned in the same breath with that of
the Marne, thus uniting in a halo of glory the two greatest episodes
in the history of those nations which are shedding their blood in the
cause of true civilization. Of this we are assured by the miraculous
revival of the fighting spirit of our soldiers and by the evidence that
our country is fully aware of the part history has called on her to play
[29]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
for the triumph of those principles of justice which the world originally
learned from Italy.
With this faith in our destiny, with the assurance that right can-
not be permanently destroyed by might, with confidence and gratitude
that the glorious American republic on our side has added her sense
of right and her unlimited strength, we face the future bravely.
II
&trwjn> of S0m* au& Jtalg Against
Futontr Brutality
ERHAPS I need not remind you that Italy's struggle
against the enemy of to-day goes back to the time
when, some twenty centuries ago, on the selfsame
fields and mountains that are now a part of our
common allied front, the Roman eagle was already
waging that fight against the barbarians in which
the American eagle has recently joined us. The
struggle of to-day is, to us Italians, the rounding-out of a tremendous
cycle of world-history, in which, alone of all civilized nations, Italy was
in at the beginning, and is in at the finish.
Since the time when Roman law laid the foundations for the
international intercourse of the world, the struggle has gone on
against Teutonic brutality. We are in it as a nation with all the
traditions and survivals of centuries, with all the memories of the
race, with all the influences of obscure ancestral heredities. One verse
of our national hymn reminds us that no Teuton stick ever curbed
Italy, and that the children of Rome do not grow to a yoke. That was
the blunder of the enemy: he did not realize that to a liberty-loving
people the spirit of freedom is like the breathing of pure air an essen-
tial of life. Sometimes the freeman does not know how essential it is
until someone tries to take it from him : then he must die or revolt.
Italy revolted.
Nowhere else as in Italy have the boldest elements of evil worked
to disrupt the unity of the nation's will and to nullify the patriotic
efforts of the government and of the people. Nowhere has the test,
consequently, been more crucial and significant, nor the spirit and the
love of freedom more resiliency and convincingly triumphant.
[30]
THE PURITY OF PURPOSE OF ITALY
To-day the whole nation has stood, strong and determined, facing
the enemy of centuries entrenched once more in the Venetian plains ;
and never was Italy's spirit higher or her attitude more defiant. Back
of our lines every old man, woman, and child fought his or her share
of the war. And though the food and fuel problems with us were
brought down to actual questions of life and death, through want of
the necessities of daily existence, yet the hundreds of thousands of
refugees from our invaded and unredeemed provinces where the
enemy did his worst to defy every law of God and man were wel-
comed with fullness of heart throughout the homes of the nation, the
widow's mite being shared with those more destitute than she. Social
service and volunteer civic assistance have been a matter of course to
every citizen who is not a soldier or a war worker. The ruthless treat-
ment inflicted by the enemy on noble portions of our land merely
strengthened our determination and gave backbone to our resistance ;
for peace cannot be between the offender and the offended until the
wrongs are righted and justice is enforced:
With our Queen working in the hospitals and our King soldiering
in the trenches, we felt that the democratic spirit of the Italian consti-
tutional monarchy needed no interpretation nor explanation to the
people of this great Republic, and that our place rightfully was with
those fighting for the triumph of a democracy the spirit of which is
the essential spirit of our liberally-planned and liberally-evolving
institutions.
Whatever the enemy may have had to say, or may have desired
others to believe about it, Italy was not in this war for any base and
selfish motives of conquest, imperialism, or unlawful territorial
aggrandizement. While in fact fighting for the liberation of all man-
kind, threatened with oppression and slavery, Italy was aiming at the
liberation of her oppressed sons within and beyond the boundary
imposed upon her by an iniquitous treaty.
For the freedom of our country we need security on land and sea,
a security which Nature itself had assured us, with well-defined geo-
graphic boundaries, and which the violence of oppressive and barbar-
ous nations has too long stolen from us. We saw our duty clearly,
and, faithful to our duty, we could not lay down our arms until the
freedom of mankind, including the freedom of our oppressed brothers
and the security of our land, had been attained.
At the same time we have looked with heartfelt sympathy and
a sincere spirit of cooperation upon the lawful aspirations and rights
[31]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
of other countries ; for we have fought too long and too hard for the
achievement of our national unity and independence to grudge others
the same blessings. We, who know all the hardships of such strug-
gles, only wish that others might be spared such distress. All of those
who have suffered, or are still suffering, from the same oppression
and injustice, who have been with us in the hopes and throes of redemp-
tion, the fight for the realization of a great ideal, we have hoped to
have with us also on the day of victory and vindication. We wish to
share with them the triumph of such ideals of world-justice and free-
dom as our patriots, our warriors, and the great thinkers of our race,
from Dante to Mazzini, Carducci, and Cavour, anticipated with their
heart's desire, or consecrated with their life's blood, long before the
material realization could be enforced. It is bound to be enforced
to-day by the united efforts of all the civilized nations of the world
from Italy, the oldest, to America, the youngest, whose armies joined
us and stood firm on the battlefields of France, in communion of ideals
and deeds, to decide the fight which Humanity has waged for the
freedom and future peace of her sons.
1 32 1
JftaUfa Army in % Unrto
A &ljuri &tatrmntt on an JmmenBf Hark
BY
MAJOR-GENERAL EMILIO GUGLIELMOTTI
Military Attache to the Royal Italian Embassy at Washington
NSPIRED by common ideals with France, Italy cour-
ageously severed the ties binding her to the Central
Powers and by her neutrality saved France in 1914.
She saved the great common cause in a most danger-
ous moment, entering the War in the Spring of 1915.
Lacking arms and ammunitions, inferior in number
and positions, she fought victoriously alone during
two years and a half on a front longer and much harder than the
French-Belgian front; and later, in spite of being obliged to yield
against the united and overwhelming forces of the four enemy autoc-
racies, she succeeded alone, in November, 1917, in barring on the
Piave their march towards the heart of France through the maritime
Alps. She renewed victoriously the same miracle in June, 1918, open-
ing thus the set of Entente victories; and in October, 1918, she
definitely crushed the secular Austrian military power with the great-
est victory known in history, of which eight hundred thousand prison-
ers, seven thousand guns, two hundred and fifty thousand horses
captured, are the speaking proof and trophy.
By such a victory Italy opened the road to Germany's southern
borders, this being one of the decisive factors of Germany's uncondi-
tional surrender. She gave also a direct contribution to the victory
on the French front by sending there strong contingents of workmen
and soldiers. Rheims, Bligny, the Aisnes and the Ailette rivers,
Chemin des Dames, Rocroy, are French witnesses to Italian glory.
[33]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
By her long and sharp resistance on Hill 1050 in Macedonia, the natu-
ral strategic support of the left wing of the Allies, Italy efficiently
co-operated with the Macedonian drive and the consequent defeat of
Bulgaria ; to which she also contributed by quickly advancing all along
her Albanian front. She fought side by side with her Allies in the
Holy Land and in Siberia; and fought also in Erythrea and in Lybia
against the intrigues and rebellions organized and encouraged by the
Central Powers.
Without coal, without raw material, scant of food, badly handi-
capped by the decline of her exchange even on the Allied markets, Italy
spent in the War most of her national wealth, suffered silently up to
the extreme limits, and silently fought and won on land and sea.
With a territory 32 times smaller than that of the United States,
with a population of about 36,000,000, Italy had only 17,000,000 men,
of which but 9,000,000 were of an available age, owing to the large
emigration. In spite of all this, Italy called to the colors 5,250,000 men
and kept up during the whole War an Army of more than four millions.
Up to September, 1918, her losses were more than one and a half mil-
lion, of whom about one million are a definite loss to the Nation
half a million dead, and half a million mutilated, blind, permanently
disabled.
Last but not least, Italy made another great, if indirect, contribu-
tion. Three hundred thousand soldiers of the fighting Army of this
great America, and half a million of its Army of efficient workmen,
had Italian blood in their veins.
[34]
Arttue i$tltttrr of % Jltaltan Nau
BY
REAR-ADMIRAL COUNT MASSIMILIANO LOVATELLI
Naval Attache to the Royal Italian Embassy at Washington
HE TASK of the Italian Navy during the War has been
particularly delicate and difficult because of the char-
acter of the sheet of water and the coastland in and
along which it was primarily called to operate.
Although the protection of innumerable insular bul-
warks and strong naval bases on the Dalmatian side
of the Adriatic gave a tremendous advantage to the
enemy fleet, this did not deter the Italians from seeking and offering
fair fight in open waters. But when it became obvious that the enemy
preferred to use the advantage of geography, rather than meet the
risk of action, Italian effort turned to the bottling-up of the opposing
fleet within the barriers of its own ports, thus reducing it to harmless-
ness in fact, to absence from the field of operations. After this the
Italian big units, less those that enemy intrigue blew up in Italian ports,
mostly served as training schools for the unending stream of human
force that was called into service and thence often into eternity -
by the patrolling of the dangerous waters.
The small cruisers, monitors, destroyers, torpedo-boats, sub-
mersibles, chasers, armed motor-boats known as " M A S," and other
surface-craft, devised to meet the demands of the new type of action
which the absence of big enemy units from open waters and the enemy
system of snake-darts and raids on the open Italian shore had forced
upon us, bore the brunt of the situation; while the naval crews
manning the armoured trains on the Italian coast very efficiently and
[35]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
brilliantly co-operated in the general work by which the Navy met
the conspicuous disadvantages of the Italian situation in the Adriatic,
and the unfairness of the Austrian system of naval warfare. The
same can be said of the entire force of naval aviators, whose chief title
to the world's gratitude, however, lies in the defense and protection
which they gave to Venice.
A word of unstinted praise belongs also to the men of the mer-
chant fleet who, no less than the Royal Navy men, fought a danger-
ously hard fight of their own; as well as to the crews of the mine-
sweepers and drifters, who were kept busy combing the sea and watch-
ing the Otranto gates.
The medical corps, besides its regular work, added a fine page to
its records by the fight for sanitation in Albania.
The sailors who had done well in the lagoons of Grado and the
plains of Monfalcone, went beyond their previous achievements when
Venice was menaced and they were detailed to " the frog-ponds " of
the Piave, which none but waterfowl, it was said, could be expected
to stand in, much less to hold.
Half submerged in water, fighting from armed pontoons, they
held.
Besides this, care had to be taken of the other seas, entirely
free from legitimate enemy appearances, it is true, but viciously
infested by submarines to an extent that can now be admitted, but
with the exact knowledge of which it would then have been unwise,
or at best useless, to burden the civilian population.
To this must be added the convoying of ships through the Medi-
terranean, the watching and defense of the North African coast,
co-operation with allied navies in Eastern seas, especially in the trans-
portation and supplying of the army of Salonica and, last but not
least, the transportation of the whole bulk of the retreating Serbian
Army, with 30,000 of their Austrian prisoners, to places of safety
for the former, of safekeeping for the latter, during the winter and
spring of 1915-16.
As a result of this " silent, unremittent daily pressure," many
deeds were accomplished in silence that came fully up to the standard
of the few brilliant exploits that have entered into the knowledge of
the world. Those to whom the world's praise was given deserved it
wefl ; but it must be said in justice to all the rest that the heroic quality
of their silence has been a factor of victory not less efficient than the
most brilliant achievements of their comrades.
[36]
[37]
HIS K\ri:i,LI-:.\<'Y. ( (H NT VINCKN/O MACCHI 1)1 CELLEUE, ITALIAN AMMASSADOU
TO THE UNITED STATES
From a photograph by Edmonston, Washington, D. C.
[38]
ni:u I:\CI:I.M-:M v. mr.NTKss I>OI,OKI:S MA< < m i>i ci:i.i.i:i:i:. \\ii'i: i>r TIII: ITALIAN
TO rin: i MTKI> STATKS
From a photojrraph l>v IvlunuistiMi Wa>liiii(;tiiii. I
[39]
C '
[40]
Jtgtfttttg >tr*n0tlf of
Staltan
Valor and Jhnurra of tEuimrmtrr
Inj (apsar's Urgtons
BY
THE HONORABLE SALVATORE A. COT1LLO
New York State Senator
recent mission to Italy did not concern itself with the
Italian soldier. What I have seen of him has been
as a casual observer rather than as a student. Never-
theless, in spite of unsystematic observation, certain
qualities of the Italian soldier have impressed them-
selves with extraordinary force, compelling admira-
tion, willy-nilly, to stand at attention before this little
champion of freedom so often misunderstood and misrepresented.
First and foremost I must mention the Italian soldier's amazing
capacity for enduring hardship. As my trips through Italy revealed
what the soldiers had to contend with, and the scarcity of the means
at their disposal, I could not fail to recognize that in spite of all the
lapse of distance, the changes and foreign admixtures of two thousand
years, the olive-grey soldier of Italy to-day is in point of endurance
the genuine descendant of the tunic-clad legionary of ancient Rome.
In describing the Trojan forefathers of Rome, Virgil ascribed to them
the qualities of the Romans of his day : the companions of -^Eneas were
men of endurance, acquainted with suffering and sacrifice. Cicero
and other Latin writers also mention as worthy of admiration the
Roman campaigner's ability to stand the rigors of extreme climates
and do without the three most primary necessities, food, drink, and
sleep.
These qualities are as characteristic of the Italian soldier of to-day
as they were of the Roman soldier of 2,000 years ago. With small
rations, with insufficient equipment, with means ridiculously dispro-
portionate to their needs, the Italians have held on to the snow-clad
[41]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
mountain fastnesses of their northern front, where the only means of
communication with the bases in the rear are eerie, swaying cable lines,
which join peak to peak and span precipices and dizzy chasms whose
bottoms swim under the eye thousands of feet below. With never a
murmur, with a disregard for physical comfort not paralleled in any
other army, the Italian soldier fought, bled, and died for two long
years, clinging to the dusty, sun-baked, waterless slopes of the
inhospitable Carso.
The fighting done by the Italian soldier in this war has been of
a truly epic character. He has fought on with a fortitude and bravery
seldom found in great masses of men. Just before Caporetto, par-
ticularly, the suffering of the soldiers became almost unendurable.
Oftentimes their meals were scarcely more than a dry crust ! Yet that
would have been good enough for them. The distressing feature was
the news from back home, where whole communities were without
bread for weeks at a stretch. The soldiers' wives and children were
suffering, and the men were not allowed leaves of absence every four
months to visit their families, as with the French. They had only a
leave of absence of ten days once a year. Could it be that they were
purposely kept from going home ?
Under these conditions the Austrians made their proffers of
peace, of "fraternization." Italian newspapers of unmistakable pro-
war leanings were by the Austrians counterfeited and these forgeries
circulated among the Italian soldiers with the pretended news that
British and French soldiers were massacring the people of the Italian
cities who clamored for bread. Then suddenly, overnight, German
soldiers took the place of the Austrians who had been "fraternizing"
with the Italians. Surprised by a powerful foe while in such a state
of mental and physical suffering, the Italians were overpowered.
Lack of military foresight, in failing to establish a line of possible
retreat, created additional trouble and losses. Vast forces had to
retreat, and in haste. The losses in men, and especially in guns and
supplies, were staggering for Italy, for Italy lacked the great reserve
of guns and supplies enjoyed by England and France.
With an acute shortage of food throughout the kingdom, with an
army greatly diminished in numbers, with the extreme difficulty
caused by the enemy's seizure of a large percentage of their weapons,
the Italian soldiers nevertheless held firm against an enemy enriched
by these captures, superior in numbers, and flushed with victory.
The fact that in spite of these terrible handicaps the men of Italy by
[42]
THE FIGHTING STRENGTH OF THE ITALIAN SOLDIER
desperate valor were able to stop the Barbarian onslaught in the fall
of 1917, and thereby save the allied cause, is a page of imperishable
glory added to a history of Italian arms already luminous.
The cause of the free peoples of the earth has never hung by so
fine a thread as during the days of the second half of October, 1917.
What was it that saved the world during those critical days ? It was
the power of self-sacrifice to the uttermost of whole regiments of
Italy's sons. The twice-famous Piave bears witness to this fact.
With a blind fury, a heroism arising out of their painful consciousness
of the critical situation, Italy's manhood held at the Piave after the
disastrous retreat from Caporetto. The best of Italy's cavalry
regiments rushed upon the enemy, to certain death, in order to stay
his advance.
With hardly anything but their naked bayonets, a brigade of
Bersaglieri annihilated or captured an entire brigade that had set foot
across the Piave. With a human wall of sheer devotion and heroism
they held their lines.
It has been said that this checking of the Caporetto rout for rout
it was was a miracle. If by miracle we mean the turning of an
irresistible physical tide by forces entirely outside the realm of the
physical, coming from the inmost recesses of a people's soul, then the
resistance at the Piave was a miracle, just as the battle of the Marne
was a miracle. But the two wonders had this difference, that the
Germans at the Marne were also being threatened by an invasion of
northern Prussia, while at the Piave the Germans, far from suffering
anv threat against their northern frontiers, were safely installed at
Riga.
It has also been suggested that the Piave line was held, thanks
to the Franco-British reinforcements that came to the aid of Italy.
Far be it from me to depreciate the aid given by England and France
at that time. But the truth is that these reinforcements arrived when
the tide had already been stemmed. The Franco-British reinforce-
ments no doubt helped to relieve the tension, but when they reached
the front the stabilization of the Piave line had already taken place.
The acts of valor which immortalized the Piave, both in October,
1917, and in June, 1918, would fill volumes.
In October, 1917, as the Italians were nearing the Piave, a bat-
talion became separated from its regiment. It was isolated and encir-
cled by overwhelmingly superior forces. As long as ammunition
lasted the battalion held its ground to a man. When their ammunition
[43]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
was exhausted the men still held grimly, knowing that unless help
came from some source they must surrender or die to a man. They
preferred to die. Just then a man presented himself to the commander
of the battalion, with tears in his eyes begging to be permitted to
attempt alone to run the gauntlet of the enemy's lines in an effort to
reach the rest of the regiment and summon help. This volunteer was
strapped to a horse's belly and sent through the enemy's ranks. He
succeeded, but when reinforcements finally came it was too late. A
small remnant of the battalion had cut a passage through the foe, but
the bulk of the battalion, including its commander, lay dead on the
field of honor.
During the second battle of the Piave the enemy had succeeded in
reaching the Italian lines. The Austrians occupied part of the railroad
leading from Montello to Treviso, the northern and southern ends
remaining in Italian hands, after the middle portion of the railroad
had passed into Austrian control. A message from the Italian forces
holding the extreme end of the Montello reached headquarters : their
ammunition was running low, whereas success depended upon the
unceasing fire of the batteries at that end of the line. What was to be
done? The only means of sending munitions quickly and in sufficient
quantity was the railway line itself part of it occupied by the enemy.
General Fadini, commanding the artillery, at once ordered a train
to be got ready, while meantime battle-planes were ordered to fly over
the line to observe if it was still intact. The aviators reported that
they could see no obstruction. At once a single locomotive was rushed
off, helter-skelter, escorted by battle and bombing planes. After a
giddy race it reached Montebellura safely, and word was sent back by
telephone that the line was still practicable. A large convoy of forty
cars, loaded with ammunition and bristling with machine-guns, was
then sent headlong towards the enemy. It burst through the Austrian
lines spreading death in its passage. The fire from all kinds of enemy
guns a single hit from which would have sufficed to explode the
entire train was directed upon it, all in vain. The convoy reached
the exhausted batteries, the Italian cannon belched fire and destruc-
tion with renewed vigor, and the day was won.
General Sante Ceccherini, commanding the Third Brigade of
Bersaglieri, is a hero in the fullest sense of the word. He has been
decorated five times with the military medal; has been awarded the
Italian, French, English, and Serbian war-cross ; is a Chevalier of the
Crown of Italy, and numbers five campaigns to his credit. During
[44]
THE FIGHTING STRENGTH OF THE ITALIAN SOLDIER
the early days of June, 1916, he commanded, on the San Michel, two
battalions of Cyclist Bersaglieri. At that time he was Lieutenant-
Colonel. Having reached the top of the mountain he saw about him
only 150 men and 5 officers out of the 900 men and 18 officers with
whom he had started the attack. Two Austrian brigades surrounded
him 12,000 men ! Erect, on the edge of the trench, encouraging and
setting an example to his men, smiling in the midst of a hellish artillery
musketry and machine-gun fire, he quietly smoked his strong-smelling
pipe, "the colonel's gurgley old stein," as his men called it. Realizing
that the position was untenable, he would not surrender, but gathered
his men about him and hacked a way through the surrounding foe
with flashing bayonets !
Enrico Toti was another Bersaglieri hero. This young Roman
had lost his leg as a youth, but by prodigious strength and spirit he
so far overcame his handicap that his feats as a cyclist, globe-trotter,
and a swimmer were epic. At the beginning of the War he succeeded
in convincing the army officials that he could take a soldier's part.
With his bicycle he kept up with the best of them, and his crutch
became a formidable weapon. His invincible spirits made him a leader.
During an attack at Monfalcone he rushed to the attack. Mortally
wounded, but undaunted, he reached the Austrian trenches. He fell,
but rose again and, with a supreme gesture of contempt, hurled his
crutch after the fleeing enemy, shouting " Viva L'ltalia " as he fell
back, dead, into the trench.
Lieutenant Franz Fischietti was fourteen years old at the begin-
ning of the war too young for service. With the aid of a birth certifi-
cate belonging to an elder brother, who had died a child and would then
have been seventeen years old, he managed to enlist. Possessing
physical strength far beyond his years, he had no difficulty so far as
personal appearance was concerned. He always conducted himself
like a soldier and by his gallantry attained the grade of First Lieu-
tenant. When his class was at length called to the colors the class of
1900 he had to reveal his identity, for he had been listed as a deserter
although he had been fighting for over three years. He fell, fighting,
at the head of a company of shock troops.
Lieutenant Tozzolino had his right hand paralyzed by a wound,
but stayed at the front for purposes of propaganda. During the
recent battle of the Piave he managed to reach a battalion which was
conducting an attack against the enemy. The major in command
having been killed, the men showed signs of indecision, beginning to
[45]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
retreat. Lieutenant Tozzolino placed himself at their head, led them
back to the attack, and reconquered the position.
Sergeant Crespi of the 16th Bersaglieri, actuated by the loftiest
sentiments of comradeship and altruism, having played a brilliant part
in the capture of a difficult mountain position, ran out repeatedly,
braving the murderous fire of enemy machine-guns 100 metres away,
leaping over chasms and ravines, in order to bring back to safety five
wounded comrades.
Truly these are heroic deeds, a few samples of Italian valor that
have come within my personal knowledge from the mouths of the men
who witnessed them. Both of the battles of the Piave, and the eleven
offensives on the Isonzo, are crowded with such deeds.
Yet, to my mind, the loftiest examples of heroism I have ever met
in any army are those of two humble peasant soldiers whom I saw and
heard personally in Southern Italy. Both were married, while one of
them had three children. One came home on leave, to find his wife
dead and his three children motherless and helpless. The other came
home to find an insane wife. Upon my asking what they meant to do,
now that their families were wrecked, each replied with sublime
simplicity, "I must go back to the front to do my duty !"
These words from the mouths of these humble men were a revela-
tion to me. I stood amazed, in awed admiration, as one stands before
the inscrutable wonders of Nature.
Verily, the breed of Attilius Regulus is not dead in Italy !
[46]
GDurctljrnrn af Awatrta
BY
CAPTAIN ALESSANDRO SAPELLI
Former Governor of Benadir, One of Italy's Colonies in Africa
CTljr Preliminary $ituatiun
ERY LITTLE has been said in America of the Italian
military operations on the Isonzo, though these opera-
tions were initiated at a moment extremely precarious
for the Allied armies. Italy entered the fray at the
very time when the Dardenelles campaign, due to
lack of quick decision and proper preparation, had
proven a failure. Italy entered at the very time when
the Russian armies, on which France relied, had been disastrously
beaten on the Biale and Dumajez and were evacuating Czernowicz,
Przemysl, and Leopolis. Italy thus entered the War at the time when
Germany and Austria, strong in the knowledge of the Russian defeat,
were ready to throw their entire strength on the western front -
before England could transport her new army across the Channel, or
France reorganize her armies and get her " second wind." At this
moment, most critical for the Allies, Italy entered the conflict; and
from that hour until the end she kept engaged on her front over one-
third of the Teutonic coalition.
But of all the dangers by her undergone, of all the desperate
struggles, the gigantic efforts, the heroic exploits of the titanic battle
waged by Italy, the world took little notice until after the disaster of
Caporetto. Then Italy began to be spoken of, but more in reference
to the danger to which France would be exposed should the forces of
[47]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
the Central Empires, passing through the Po Valley, succeed in attack-
ing her from Savoy and the Delphinate a frontier which, since 1914,
the declaration of Italian neutrality had permitted France to leave
undefended, enabling her to take from thence the 500,000 men that
were the decisive factor in winning the first battle of the Marne.
Yet, even after Caporetto, the decisions of the Allies were pain-
fully slow, perhaps because they considered Italy definitely out of the
fight. The Austro-German invasion of Italy, however, the conse-
quence of a moral deficiency and not of a military defeat, was stopped
though he had failed to get the Allied support he looked for, he
Allied re-enforcements, absolutely inadequate to the situation, had
orders to entrench themselves on the Mincio, more than 100 kilometers
behind the firing line.
After this heroic check of the invaders at the Piave silence again
enveloped all things pertaining to Italy. Then came the great Austrian
offensive of June, 1918, that ended for the enemy so miserably, as
everyone will remember. This Austrian reverse again revealed the
power of Italy to strike in self-defense, but was not a result of Italian
initiative. Much was said about it, partly, perhaps, because it helped
to draw public attention from a critical situation on the western front
between Bapaume and Chauny, but surely more because it seemed that
this Italian victory might be as it proved to be the first of a
series of successes leading into the offensive that should bring the
Allies to final victory. A signal success was just then needed to
strengthen the morale of the Allies, and Italy produced it by her
staggering blow that turned the Austrian attack into a crippling defeat.
Thus Germany lost the support of her powerful ally ; and with the
strengthening of the Allied armies by the arrival of the American
troops, and the unification of the supreme command in Marshal Foch,
the chances in favor of the Allied arms tremendously increased. In-
deed from that moment, when Italian valor transformed the threaten-
ing host of Austria into an army of discouragement, Hindenburg,
pressed on all sides along the whole front from the sea to the Argonne,
abandoned all hopes of a victory in France and began hasty disposi-
tions for a shortening of the front and a full retreat to the formidably
defended lines of the Rhine, where prolonged resistance would have
given his country at least a diplomatic victory.
Most people at this juncture regarded the Italians as played out,
after their efforts in June, 1918. and as quite incapable of anything
more than to hug the shores of me Piave. The peculiar thing to note
[48]
THE OVERTHROW OF AUSTRIA
is that Austria alone seemed aware of the menace against her repre-
sented by Italy; but that Austria herself apprehended the worst is
clearly proved by her stubborn refusal to send help to Germany, and
her policy of constantly increasing her armies opposite the Italians
on the Piave and the Alpine front.
Then came the final Italian victory so suddenly, and with con-
sequences so enormous and so immediate, that there seemed hardly
time to speak of the battle itself, which nevertheless was not only a
masterpiece of military technique, but a marvelous example of human
will and intrepidity.
II
(Elf* Umrt of % Austrian Arttwa
With always the same fixed idea of descending through the
valley of the Po, along the Brenta and Adige valleys, cutting out
Venice and the Veneto, the Austrians had been concentrating their
forces in the mountain region. Yet, not having recovered from the
defeat suffered at the hands of the Italians in June, knowing that no
help was forthcoming from Germany, and seriously affected by the
Bulgarian defection, Austria did not dare to resume the offensive.
This situation had not escaped the keen eye of General Diaz ; and, even
though he had failed to get the Allied support he looked for, the
launched his offensive.
The Brenta and the Piave in their upper courses move, one from
west to east and the other from east to west, as if they were about to
meet. Separated about midway of their length by the massif of
Monte Grappa and Monte Pertica, they reach the sea, almost parallel,
in a south-easterly direction. The Italian Army formed a semicircle,
its left wing touching Monte Baldo, the centre on Monte Grappa and
Montello, between the two rivers, Piave and Brenta, and the right on
the west side of the Piave.
The plan of General Diaz, perfectly carried out by his army com-
manders, was to press hard at the centre, thus calling all the Austrian
forces toward the point where the valleys seem to meet ; to manoeuvre
the armies directly on the right of the Grappa in such a way that the
line would extend itself towards the west, with the front facing north ;
[49]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
take possession of Monte Cuero, on the left of the Piave; force the
mountain passes leading to the high valley, and shut off the enemy's
retreat towards Belluno. From the Altipisino dei Sette Communi,
simultaneously, an army should descend to trap the foe in the valley
between Quero and Fonzaso; while, lastly, the extreme left should at
the same time have advanced through the Valle Arsa upon Rovereto
and Trento, engaging the Austrian reserves in that quarter and reach-
ing Trento ahead of any Austrian columns that might succeed in re-
treating along the Val Sugaria.
The most dangerous of these actions was that assigned to the
troops stationed to the east of Monte Grappa, who would have had the
right flank and their shoulders unprotected. But, to guard against
this danger, the Italian high command ordered an advance of the
troops lined up along the lower Piave, who were to move towards the
Livenza, the Tagliamento, and the old Isonzo line, thus forming a
right angle with the remaining line of the front covering the action at
the centre, and could eventually constitute its reserve.
This plan, which was begun on October 24 (exactly one year from
the Caporetto disaster), starting with a violent feint in the zone of
Monte Grappa (that cost the sacrificing of 20,000 Italian lives, and 60,-
000 wounded), was developed without hesitations during the next few
days. For some hours it looked as if the encircling movement would
come to naught, on account of the sudden flooding of the Piave that
carried away all the bridges, at a moment when only a part of the
Eighth and Tenth Army had passed on the left shore. But, thanks
to the activity of the Italian Army Engineers in re-establishing com-
munications, and the uninterrupted forwarding of supplies and muni-
tions, the latter carried out by our Capronis, and the tenacious resist-
ence of our First Division against the attempts of the Austrian troops
to push the Italians back to the Piave, the most powerful difficulties
created by Nature were overcome by Man. However, even by the
evening of the 27th, the plans of the command were slated to win.
The enemy had re-enforced its lines in front of the Grappa, and was
wasting itself in desperate attacks, in attempting to reconquer the posi-
tions, leaving thus ample time for the converging and encircling move-
ment of the Eighth, Tenth, and Twelfth Armies, that, by the 28th, had
already reached the heights of Valdobbiadene and the River Solizo.
From that moment, the fate of the Austrian Army was sure. In
its retreat, it would be obliged to extend itself through the valleys, lose
the tactical contact, and moral cohesion. The battle was lost, so far as
[50]
THE OVERTHROW OF AUSTRIA
the Austrian Army was concerned. It still resisted'with the strength
of desperation, but, on the 3rd of November, when the victorious
Italians had already to their credit prisoners amounting to 416,116
soldiers, 10,658 officers, and 6,818 cannon, the Austrian General
Weber von Webenau accepted the conditions of the Armistice dictated
by the Council of Versailles. That which had been one of the most
thoroughly organized armies in the world had nothing left to it but
disorganized bands of soldiers, of its former seventy-three Divisions,
which had been completely routed by six Allied Divisions and fifty-one
Italian Divisions. The Italians, on the llth, had already reached the
Brennero, ready to march on the southern frontiers of the German
confederation. But, on that same day also, the Teutonic Empire, left
alone in the field, threatened by enemies on all sides, asked and
obtained an armistice.
The results of the victory on the Piave were superior to all
expectations, but worthy of the genius with which the plans of the
battle had been laid and executed and, above all, of the heroism and
fighting qualities of the soldiers who " carried on."
[51]
0f a
(EapootBtrta
from
BY
COLONEL UGO PIZZARELLO
OLONEL UGO PIZZARELLO, a valiant fighter in
the Great War, is a native of Capodistria, which is but
a few miles south of Trieste. He was born into the
midst of the tragedy of the unredeemed provinces.
for, in his infancy, his father was seized and im-
prisoned for the heinous offence of loving Italy and
fighting with Garibaldi. His whole family, exiled
from their home, took refuge in the kingdom of Italy. These circum-
stances were branded upon his youthful mind as with a flame. His
young manhood was consecrated to a spiritual and moral preparation
for that great hour when Italy should rise in maternal power and
gather into her own fold her children, Trieste, Fiume, Istra, Dal-
matia, and the valley of the Adige. He took up arms for Italy while
still a lad. The Great War was to him a clarion call to the fulfillment
of his early dreams. As Captain of Infantry he fought with such
heroism that, after twenty-six months in the trenches, and after he
had received four grievous wounds (one from a bullet that even now
lies imbedded in the cerebrum), he was promoted to a Colonelcy on
December 1, 1916. He was awarded two silver medals for military
valor, and a gold one, as well as the cross of Knight of the Military
Order of Savoy. The last two were assigned him by the King of
Italy, and are the two most coveted of all Italian military honors. He
was also decorated by France, Russia, and Serbia. His words deserve
a hearing. The Editors.
[52]
Hotr? of a >oUtor from
HROUGHOUT the years of the Great War, I was
keenly aware of all the enormous sacrifices borne by
my country for the sake of following up that victory
which irradiated decisively from every Italian front.
So it was natural that I should grieve more deeply
at the unjust discussions to defraud her of her Italian
provinces in favor of a nationality which, on the
theatre of action, was our enemy, as well as that of the Entente, to the
very last battle.
Our Adriatic aspirations are solely and exclusively national ones.
To one who understands, it seems to betray ignorance to call such
aspirations Italian imperialism when we remember that the idea of
national Italian unity always embraced the regions of the Valley of
the Adige, eastern Friule, Trieste, Istria, Fiume, and Dalmatia.
Our ancient mother, Rome, after the second Punic War, felt the
absolute need of occupying and colonizing Dalmatia for her own life,
and for the protection of the eastern Adriatic. Even to-day the traces
of this ancient occupation remain, traces very evident and positive
that, for the most part, the civilization of modern Dalmatia is essen-
tially Latin.
Such a need is necessarily recalled to mind in the case of Venice,
who, for the protection of her commerce and for her very existence,
had dire need of the coast of Dalmatia. Only from Dalmatia as a
base of action could she obstruct the predatory raids of pirates from
the numerous Illyrian ports. All the little cities of the Dalmatian
coast, in their great monuments and their architectural constructions,
sing of Venice and of her glorious spirit of leadership. The same dire
necessity weighs upon Italy to-day, only it is strengthened by the truth
[53]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
that, during the Great War, our not having possession of the eastern
Adriatic coast constituted one of the greatest handicaps in the struggle
of arms. It is owing almost exclusively to just this strategical handi-
cap by sea that, in spite of the superb valor of the Italian Navy, we
Italians met with so many serious losses on the water. The official
Naval Bulletin, in its publications, made it very clear that, during the
cruel struggle of her people, Italy sacrificed 60 units, large and small,
of her Navy and suffered the loss of as many ships of her mercantile
marine as amounted altogether to 880,000 in the way of tonnage. All
this depletion did not include the distressing situation of our Adriatic
coast; for, in the recovered cities which were constantly threatened
by such accessible invasions and such easy bombardments, we suffered
heavy material losses, and many ^victims. More than that, they were
called upon to bear the economic ruin which followed the necessary
cessation of all their maritime traffic.
After so many sacrifices on the sea; after that ocean of blood
that cost some half a million lives; after hundreds of thousands of
our wounded scattered throughout Italy in every city, every village,
and in the camps, all recording with the living torture of their bodies
the price of their victory; after the economic sacrifice, weighing so
heavily upon us, and even greater than our resources (the expense of
sixty billion lire for the War) ; must we experience discussion and con-
test over that national unity for which we Italians in our struggle have
yearned and in our victory actually achieved?
Italy had already saved humanity by remaining neutral, and thus
making possible the first great victory of the Entente, that of the
Marne. When Italy entered the War, she did so renouncing easy and
magnificent gains and the offering of lands far more extensive than
these very ones to which she aspires to-day. She entered it, facing
serenely all the tortures and all the destruction of a war such as is
fought to-day, because, land of justice that she is, she was conscious
of the ideal of right that incited her to uphold the just cause and that
made clear to her the necessity of the re-establishment of Belgium, the
restoration of Alsace and Lorraine to France, and the just restoration
of Bohemia, Poland, Roumania, Serbia, and Armenia.
But, side by side with the ideal of liberty for other peoples, and
other nationalities, there always existed and still lives both in the
people and in the Army a glowing consciousness of impelling neces-
sity of national unity. That alone can insure Italy's economic develop-
ment without hindrance or threats, an ecenomic development which
[54]
THE VOICE OF A SOLDIER FROM CAPODISTRIA
can place her in a situation of potential prosperity for the future.
This national unity to which we are pledged, after a century of
struggle full of martyrdoms and sublime sacrifices, can not nay,
must not come to us contested, especially by our great Allies who
know so well that heroic effort our country made, and know equally
well how powerfully this effort has contributed to the victory of all.
We hold, too, that our Adriatic aspirations are reduced to such
a minimum as certainly can not offend or limit the economic develop-
ment of the other Adriatic peoples, who, under the protection of the
free flag of Italy, can have perfectly free scope for their economic
development and for their commerce.
We ask for only that tract of coast in Dalmatia where the Italians
of that land succeeded in defending and maintaining their nationality
in spite of the great odds against them. The Italians of Dalmatia,
exalted by their long martyrdom of subjection to a foreign yoke, must
obtain their just reward for all their sufferings endured in the long
struggle as only Latins can endure. That reward is union with their
own country.
Throughout Dalmatia the tenor of life and civilian prosperity
has, from of old, borne the stamp of Italian civilization, while, through-
out her two thousand years of history, there came down to Dalmatia
from the Dinaric Alps, nothing but barbarians, dangers, devastations,
and slaughters. Bitter was the struggle of Venice against her
ferocious exterminator from the eastern Balkans.
The most recent history of the Balkan nations has placed con-
spicuously in the light their unrest and violence. After their victory,
they turned upon each other, tearing each other to pieces. Worse still,
one people among them, the Bulgarians, did not hesitate to ally them-
selves with their recent pitiless oppressors, the infidel Turks, to fight
against Russia, the mother to whom Bulgaria owed her very existence
as a nation.
Italy is desirous of friendship with the Slavs, and she has shown
it by effective diplomatic assistance always extended to Serbia in
critical moments before the War. She has shown it during the War
by the deeds performed by Italian Army corps who fought in the
Balkans and left thousands of dead for the resurrection of Serbia.
She has shown it by the deeds of the Italian Navy, whose marvellous
daring and sacrifices both of ships and men saved the heroic Serbian
Army from ultimate ruin.
[55]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
Italy has every interest in aiding the rise of the Slav peoples, but
not to the extent of sacrificing a part of herself and of her people.
Should she do this, she would but expose herself to new dangers of a
perilous kind and to increasing occasions of future trouble. Italy
offers and can offer friendship, just government, autonomous legis-
lation, and free communities to all the peoples of non-Italian stock
living in her own territory; but a stern necessity to-day, that cannot
be ignored, impels us, even more than when the Austrian Empire
existed, to secure under proper control the eastern shore of the
Adriatic. This is, and always has been, the Latin outpost of the East.
Here, we have a people new to the society of civilized nations, a people
to whom Italy has extended hospitality and actually started on the
road to civilization for whose redemption Italy has contributed so
much in her recent sacrifices of life-blood and prosperity. Yet they
presume to demand that Italy abandon her own people to inevitable
barbaric violence, signs of which are now only too plainly manifest.
They, forsooth, would have it that across a narrow sea, and but a short
distance from her own shores which are incapable of defense, Italy
should cede that part of her own territory best fortified by nature for
deflecting dangers which threaten the safety and peace of the entire
nation.
To these claims Italy with one voice replies : ' By our sons who
died in the War ; by the heroism of our fallen ; by the best of our living
sons, the soldiers; by the bitterly contested battles of the Alps, the
Carso, the Isonzo, the Grappa, the Piave ; by the epic exploits of Luigi
Rizzo, Goiran, Pellegrini, Paolucci, Rossetti, Ciano, and d'Annunzio;
by the martyrdom of Battisti, Sauro, Chiesa, Felzi, Rismondo ; by the
tortures of all our wounded ; in the name of Justice, Right, and Liberty,
we plead for them to be restored to us our sons of the Trentino, of
Eastern Friuli, of Trieste, of Istria, of Fiume, and of Dalmatia. They
are the special objects of our tender love, because for so many years
they have suffered in vain under the galling yoke of strangers."
[56]
o
s
H -
g
rJ 8
si
[57]
[58]
[59]
ITALIAN WOMKN KKICITING ISA KHKD-WI UK KNTANGLKMKNTS
ITALIAN WO.MKN m<;<;i.\<; s !:<< .\i> UNI: TUKNCIIKS. \vun.i: nn: MI N \VK;M:
FIGHTINC IN TI1K FIKST LINK
[60]
Har &?rtnrr af Utalfem
BY
AMY A. BERNARDY
Litt. D., Universities of Rome and Florence
|ERY little has been said about the Italian woman's
share in the work of the war, possibly because very
little has been said, anyhow, about Italy's share in the
task that confronts the Allies. The mobilization of
Italian womanhood in war service has been unher-
alded as it was unpreconceived. It might almost be
described as an emotional rather than an intellectual
achievement a thing of warm-heartedness even more, or rather more,
than of clear-headedness. At any rate, it proved something of a sur-
prise even to its own sponsors when it achieved itself out of seeming
nothingness. For only to those who know by experience how the
Italian woman hated to assume the duties and privileges of the other
sex, can there come a fair realization of the wonder that it has been,
not that the things done were done so well, but rather, as in the case of
Dr. Johnson's well-known dog, that they were done at all. To attempt
to induce thousands and thousands of women of all ages and descrip-
tions to leave their homes in non-industrial regions, cover their shining
hair with factory caps caps! of all headgear the most unfamiliar to
Italian tradition, the most unbecoming to the Italian type ! and work
at a lathe or bench for ten hours or more of the day, would have con-
stituted a hopeless and at best a thankless task in normal times. No
amount of coercion or persuasion could then have overcome the inborn
repugnance of Beppina or Maria for the sort of labor which appeared
to her mind particularly fit for a man's effort.
In war time, however, things changed. Women began to know
about other women's war work in other countries; but chiefly and
above all the fact appealed to them that their husbands and sons needed
more guns and more shells to fight the enemy, so that, after a while,
employment in a munition plant came to be regarded as a sort of dis-
tinction granted them because of their relationship to men fighting
at the front. And the government was correspondingly quick in
appreciating the advisability of encouraging such sentiment. In fact,
[61]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
in some of the factories under direct government control, employment
is restricted to those women who have or have had a member of the
family in active service at the front. It can, therefore, be easily per-
ceived how a sentimental reason, as well as the omnipresent economic
reasons (for women's wages in munition plants run as high as ten to
fifteen lire a day), lies back of this awakening and development of
the Italian woman's industrial working power, which brought the
number of Italian women wage-earners from the two million and a
half of pre-war times to over five million, a number which will by no
means mark the end.
On the other hand, in the more cultivated circles of life, the
change has been equally noticeable and consequential. Women with
seemingly no public experience have sprung forth from the quiet indi-
vidual existence of their home into the light of publicity to meet the
demands of the hour. They have given life to a tremendously com-
plicated and extensive network of organizations of assistance, infor-
mation, relief, and education, which has greatly facilitated the exten-
sion of woman's utility in the industrial world, since it has made it
possible for working mothers to leave their children for the day in
the numerous baby wards and nurseries which are commonly known
throughout the country as "baby nests" (nidi), since the German
word, kindergarten, has with the little victims of the Lusitania, Bel-
gium, France, and the invaded Italian districts, forfeited forever its
readmission or retention in the world of civilization, at least to the
European mind.
The first step toward the all-around mobilization of feminine
energies in Italy was taken when, in November, 1914, in view of the
general international situation, a Woman's National Committee was
formed in Milan with the express purpose of preparing every able
bodied woman in the nation for one form or other of public service
in case of national emergencies. This was soon followed by other
committees on preparedness all over the country, in all of which women
took, from the very beginning, quite a conspicuous part, characterized
by the fact that all they have offered and achieved has been the result
of a heritage and tradition of unbroken national spirit, rather than
the businesslike falling in line of previously trained and organized
units. The women of Italy have been used for centuries, for decades
of centuries in fact, to send their men and their hearts out against the
barbarians and the invaders. Indeed, to come to recent events, the
[62]
THE WAR SERVICE OF ITALIAN WOMEN
greater part of the nineteenth century having been filled up for Italy
with the struggle against the ancestral foe, the present war is to the
Italian mind and heart only a natural and consistent continuation of
the national history, an enforcement of the main issues of millennial
national fate, the completion of a cycle of centuries, with the whole
world arrayed in a fight of right against might which Italy had begun
alone against the Germans some twenty-six hundred years ago, and
of which she sees the auspicious finish now.
Moreover, in a nation of large families and early marriages, such
as Italy is, every woman is likely to have several dear ones in the lines,
so that her personal rear-guard work is only a part of her offering to
the Motherland, and her work is no less an effort of personal love than
an outgrowth of national necessity. Incidentally, it affords light and
a lesson not without interest and significance of a general character,
showing how the Latin temperament meets emergencies and defici-
encies with its primeval power of intuition and adaptability, and how
the activity and good will of enthusiastic citizenship may efficiently
offset shortcomings in state organization, and overcome with a tidal
wave of vigor and energy the original unpreparedness of a nation,
an unpreparedness which, by the way, in Italy's case, was nothing
short of tragic. In further proof of which assertion it may come not
amiss to say right here that all the civic service work, from Red Cross
nursing down to baby-nest attendance and clerical duties in the charity
organizations, is entirely of a volunteer description, even Red Cross
nurses being expected to defray their own expenses in all save quite
exceptional cases.
Service has brought close to each other, for the first time, women
of most differentiated positions, inclinations, and training, and is
moulding them together into units of power for their own selves and
the nation. Princess and peasant, working girl and bourgeoise, equally
deserve credit for their attitude in this war. Women ladies of court
circles as well as wives of government clerks run community
kitchens, collect books for the army and navy libraries, organize tag
and flower days, solicit donations for special charities, gifts of gold
jewelry and silverware for the mint and the melting-pot, of furs and
warm clothing for alpine warfare and refugee assistance alike:
women, mostly, train the maimed, blinded, or disabled soldiers into a
renewal of active and useful life.
Two widely different episodes of woman's activity in war time
may be quoted to show how far-reaching and diversified it is. On
[63]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
one hand, we hear that the ' 'League for Mutual Aid Among the
Mothers of the Fallen in War" has just issued a call for a patriotic
book to be adopted later by the Italian public schools, as representing
"the most worthy monument to the memory of the heroes who died
in the war." And from another side we hear that the tremendous
increase in the price of shoes in Italy has caused the women to join
in "shoe-making clubs" with expert shoemakers as instructors, and
that it is now the fashionable thing for an Italian woman to point with
pride to her feet shod with shoes of her own making. Those who can
do it "follow the trade" for philanthropic purposes, as the need for
shoes is very sorely felt among the several hundred thousand refugees
from the invaded provinces and the families of the soldiers at the front.
Writers and public speakers, some of them professional, some
improvised, have given excellent service, especially in popularizing
the reasons and explaining the ideals of the war to other women ; also
in connection with the national loans, the Red Cross campaigns, and
so forth.
Committees of women have urged national resistance and sup-
ported government action in connection with the war; the work of
women doctors and nurses in hospitals has but recently received the
highest praise in the Medical Congress held at Genoa, special stress
being laid on the efficiency of moral propaganda by the women in the
military hospitals.
As for the working classes, apart from the munition workers
whom we shall mention later, squads of street sweepers, street car
conductors, motor women, railroad ticket agents, and so forth, do very
creditably their work in their respective departments. The "tram-
women" are especially attractive in their gray top coats and quaint
black satin caps, emblazoned with the crest of the city to which they
belong. Let us remark en passant that, exclusive of the nurses on
hospital duty, no other feminine uniform except that of the "tram-
women " are especially attractive in their gray top coats and quaint
streets: the old fashioned apron, wherever necessary, literally
"covers" all needs.
As for statistics and figures, they are in a state of transition
and evolution yet, and can hardly be tabulated so far. The city of
Rome has been employing about two hundred "tramwomen" and three
hundred street sweepers. The number of clerks in the various depart-
ments of state, even in the Department of War, is growing daily. In
[64]
THE WAR SERVICE OF ITALIAN WOMEN
the last clean-out of nonessential exempted men about sixty-three
thousand have been replaced by women in the most diversified posi-
tions, from that of stenographer to that of head packer in hospital
storerooms, from assistant appraiser in military supply bases to mes-
senger and usher or confidential clerk and accountant.
But these are only side issues, after all, of the great work that
women are doing all over the land along the main lines of agriculture,
munition work, food and cloth saving, and nursing. A cursory glance
at these will give us a better insight into Italy's effort.
In a country such as Italy is, where the women of the peasantry
have always given a great deal of help to agriculture, where the con-
ditions of intensive cultivation of the land, in fact, make woman's
work essential to the raising of the crops, it was, perhaps, to be
expected that the burden of the farmer should fall entirely upon
feminine shoulders and women become the food producers to the
nation. But even at that, the effort has been none the less magnifi-
cent and the result stupendous. When Italy went to war, the crops of
1915 were ready to harvest and the job was comparatively easy; but
from 1916 to 1918 the women have had to do it all, or almost all. In
Lombardy they saved the silk-worm industry and milked over 200,000
cows : in the south the result of their efforts gave to Puglia a better
harvest in 1916-17 than had been reaped in 1915-16.
Prizes having been offered in northern Italy for women farmers,
207 competed for the honors, some of them conducting farms of over
20 hectares of land. But in 1916 the prizes given were 13,000, mostly
to women who had from three to seven children under fifteen years
of age, and no men, even old men, in the house or on the farm. They
tilled their fields and raised their cattle and brought their products to
the market, and their land looked good and prosperous as before. The
prizes in 1917 were 23,000, and the records show that 38,000,000
quintals of wheat were raised; the figures for 1918 will be even
higher. But the most significant fact is perhaps this : of the five mil-
lion men that Italy has in her army, fully two million and a half were
peasants before the war their work has been done by their women.
Munitions is another interesting item in the life of the Italian
woman these days. On August 1, 1914, there were only 1,760
women employed in munition factories in Italy. December 31. 1916,
found the number grown to 90,000. May, 1917, recorded 120,000.
To-day there are over 300,000, possibly very much over. In some of
the large shell and cartridge factories fully 70 per cent, of the person-
[65]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
nel is made up of women, and a percentage of 90 may be reached in the
near future. Their work is reported to be efficient, accurate, and
reliable. On small missiles the working force is generally about 80
per cent, women ; 50 per cent, on medium shells ; 1 5 per cent, on the
large calibers. On the 38 millimeter bombs four-fifths of the working
force is female; one-third, on the 240 millimeter. On the five kilo-
gram weight piece work fully one-half of the workers are women, and
they only dwindle to one-third of the whole force on heavier weights
up to 50 kilograms. There is a munitions school for women in Rome
which turns out fifty-one experts per month; five hundred of these
have already found employment among the 2,300 women who make
munitions in Roman factories. There has been recently some talk of
an aviation school exclusively for women. Whether it will materialize
or not remains to be seen ; at any rate women are largely employed by
all the airplane factories of Italy, notably by Pomilio and Caproni.
As for the food question, here we may really say that every Italian
woman is an element of success and resistance, and here her supreme
triumph in the sustenance of the nation has been achieved. Italy has
been rationing herself since the beginning of the war with extreme
severity, and with a smile. Surely no other nation could have stood
the strict frugality that war conditions have imposed upon Italy, and
it is largely due to the traditional thrift and the culinary ability of the
Italian housewife (who is, besides, probably the only person in the
world qualified to grow a kitchen garden on a window sill), if Italy
was able to stand the tremendous increase of food prices and shortage
of foodstuffs with which she has been confronted all along.
Knitting is, as well as food, another common bond between
women of all classes in Italy. The clicking of needles has been a
familiar sound throughout the country since the very first days of the
war, when it was imperative that the deficiencies of the army supply
stores should be met. Quick knitting for the Italian hands is tradi-
tional, hereditary, ingrained knowledge of generations, unconscious
and automatic like the finger play of a skilled typist or pianist. Inci-
dentally, therefore, the Italian army sock is a thing of beauty to behold
in the making, even more so on the doorstep of a peasant cottage than
in the boudoir of a duchess. The wool shortage that confronted the
Italian soldier in the beginning was a most serious problem and full of
dire possibilities. Then it was that the women fought the battle in
their own way. The miraculous hereditary ingenuity of the woman
who had had to count cents but never counted stitches, saved the day.
[66]
THE WAR SERVICE OF ITALIAN WOMEN
Wool was found, it was utilized and coaxed into ten times its apparent
natural possibilities. It was patched, joined, quilted, split, raveled,
knitted, crocheted, colored, and discolored, woven and transformed in
and out of all shapes, patterns, and forms ; but when winter came the
soldiers had it. Together with it they had glove-leather and cotton-
wool jackets, patchwork sleeping bags, quilted newspaper blankets,
mattress-fleeced storm coats, and all manner and devices of substitutes,
but "between this and that," cold they were not. And thirty-eight
million trench candles a month, fabricated, collected, and sent out by
the National Committee for the Scaldarancio, added their welcome
glow to the soldiers' comparative comfort amid the alpine snows.
White bathrobes, hastily foregathered in the waning summer season
on the bath benches, camouflaged the Alpini in their winter quarters.
Patterns went out for helmets and sweaters, for mittens and cummer-
bunds, and there was weaving and knitting in all the homes of the
land, the women of the poorer classes working for pay, under the
supervision of the others who gave out the government wool and paid
out the government money, turning in socks and accounts under their
own responsibility, acting as agents and middlemen without profit or
charge.
From this first experiment actual workshops grew everywhere,
taking contracts for army furnishings and employing thousands of
wives and relatives of the fighting men at a scale of wages that was a
welcome addition to the scanty allowance that every soldier's family
gets from the government.
This for the " back yards ! " In the war zone a great quantity of
women found employment in the army laundries and salvage shops;
while in mountainous territory women were found very efficient and
satisfactory agents in keeping the roads clear from snow and in carry-
ing loads of war material and food to the soldiers up in the mountains,
through familiar paths. Swift, sure-footed, trustworthy, and loyal,
these sturdy daughters of the Alps in ministering thus daily to the
needs of the army engaged in alpine warfare have rendered signal
services to the nation and surely deserve far more recognition than
history will ever be able to give them.
Now for the Red Cross, the efficient Italian Red Cross that had
achieved its preparation on the oft repeated occasions of floods, earth-
quakes, epidemics, and so forth, which of late had been so frequent
in Italian life ! To the Red Cross full credit must be given for what
preparation a limited contingent of Italian women had achieved in
[67J
emergency and army nursing. Queen Elena had always been very
strongly in favor of a wider following of the nursing profession on the
part of young women of good families, and through her efforts the
southern prejudice against this form of activity as a profession was
fast disappearing. At the first indications of the European conflict the
Red Cross enlarged immediately its membership and its equipment and
opened 149 schools for volunteer nurses, who number to-day several
thousands, seven hundred of which are stationed in the actual zone of
operations. That they do their duty is evident from the fact that a
score of them have lost their lives in service, and another score have
won military recognition for signal bravery under fire. Newly trained
forces join the ranks of the Red Cross daily and new volunteer assist-
ants are constantly cropping up for the side tracks of service and the
ever growing requirements of the situation. "Every woman from six-
teen to sixty" that isn't some very definite something else in Italy
nowadays is "something in the Red Cross." There are 348 commit-
tees, exclusively feminine, active in its interest ; and, besides, the grand-
mothers volunteer for knitting, dressings, and wardrobe work; the
flappers for clerks, messengers, and helpers in various capacities, since
very wisely the Red Cross regulations exclude them from active service
in the sick wards.
Another great nursing association, the "Samaritane," has sprung
into existence to fill other crying needs in the ever growing hospital
service. With Red Cross and nursing activities the work of the Royal
Women of Italy has been chiefly connected : the significance of their
exalted position in the land seems to come home to them chiefly in
terms of responsibility. It is characteristic of Queen Elena that she
has turned the Quirinal Palace into Red Cross Hospital No. 1, and
named each ward, including the transformed throne room and ball
room, after the name of a humble hero of the present war. It is equally
characteristic of the merciful and forceful personality of the Duchess
of Aosta that, as an active nurse in the war zone, she deserved a silver
medal for military bravery, and as inspector general of the Red Cross
nurses she wields undisputed authority in the war zone as well as
throughout the hospitals of the rear lines. The Queen Mother's
beautiful residence in the Ludovisi gardens at Rome welcomes more
sick men and officers, while the beautiful castle of Moncalieri has been
turned by Princess Laetitia into a convalescent home for maimed and
disabled officers.
Almost entirely "manned," managed, and largely supported by
[68]
THE WAR SERVICE OF ITALIAN WOMEN
women are the rest-houses, canteens, railroad lunch rooms, "posti di
ristoro," "segretariati del soldato," and so forth, that stud the country
from Piedmont to Sicily. The material assistance and comfort which
they offer to the soldiers is very properly supplemented and completed
by another woman-devised and woman-managed institution, typical of
woman's best qualities of thoughtfulness and accuracy the "ufficio
notizie militari," or Bureau of Information for the interchange and
distribution of news from the soldiers to their families and vice versa.
It traces the missing, follows the sick and wounded from emergency
station to base hospital and convalescent home, writes and forwards
his correspondence, etc. A very clever system of name-and-place cards
on file helps materially in the search from every centre, and the good
work thus done by the thousand branches of the central office, which is
located in Bologna, and their several thousand volunteer workers, is
really invaluable in affording daily relief to the anxieties of thousands
of families and thousands of fighting men.
In concluding this rapid review of the Italian woman's war work
we cannot forget that though the bulk of Italian emigration to foreign
countries is made up of men and not of women, still there are enough
expatriate Italian women to have done and to keep on doing noble work
both for Italy and for their adopted countries wherever they happen
to be. The active interest taken by women of Italian birth or descent
in the Liberty Loan campaign, Red Cross auxiliaries, and other war
time organizations in this country is an excellent example of its kind,
and quite worthy of the favorable comment that it has received. The
same happens in South America, where Italian emigration is conspicu-
ously successful, and reports from Paris and Tunis, Zurich and
London, Alexandria and Bombay, show everywhere active Italian
women's committees in favor of Italy or the Allies.
Another item of interest connected with Italian emigration is that
when, during August and September, 1914, there came back to Italy,
chiefly from enemy territory, 470,000 expatriates, 63,000 of whom
were women, work was found immediately for them and for all those
who happened to follow them. Similarly the problem of the many
hundred thousand refugees from the invaded provinces has been met
and solved largely with the help of the women. The housing of fam-
ilies, the care of children, the search for work and positions and per-
manent accommodations has only been possible through the unsparing
sacrifice and devotion of the women volunteer workers in every district
of Italy.
[69]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
Although it can fairly be stated, we think, that while the change
brought about by the war in the condition of women has been greater
and more deeply felt in Italy than in other countries, where women had
already for a long time been engaged in pursuits of a character
preparatory, as it were, to present events, on the other hand the
changes that in times of peace might have seemed alarming to the con-
servative Latin mind, have taken place with wonderful smoothness
and lack of ostentation, as well as of comment, necessity being their
obvious raison d'etre and their convincing justification; the extraor-
dinary adaptability and resourcefulness of the Italian character never
showing up better than under the stress of circumstances. Where men
had gone, women have stepped in quickly, and, it may be added, grace-
fully ; so gracefully, indeed, that not the least curious and interesting
result of the feminine mobilization of Italy may be the fact that quite
possibly a feeling of national appreciation and gratitude for the
modesty and simplicity of spirit in which the service was rendered, not
less than for the efficiency of the service itself, may bring about, as an
aftermath of the war, the free offering of the political vote as a reward
to the women of a nation where women as a whole never worried very
much about it, but where they volunteered for national service in the
nation's hour of need, irrespective of personal or sex advantage, and
thereby proved themselves deserving of public recognition for the
loyalty of their patriotism and the unselfishness of their service.
[70]
Jfium?
BY
DOCTOR GINO ANTONI
Vice-Mayor of Fiume and Member of the National Council of the City
HE HONORABLE GINO ANTONI was born in
Fiumans, with loyalty in their hearts and the glorious
ing year a goodly number of impetuous, daring
their city to its motherland. In 1914 and the follow-
purpose in life to aid his fellow-Italians in restoring
Fiume, and for the last tweny years has had but one
vision of union with Italy before their minds, braved
the dangers of crossing the frontiers, for the joy of fighting beside
the Italians. On the Isonzo and in the Alps they fought and died,
happy in a death that found them on their own soil at last. Volcanic
feeling was not only finding expression on the battle-fields, but among
the civilian Fiumans who had succeeded in escaping from Magyar
tyranny, and among those of their fellow-citizens who were in Italy
before the War broke out. To be ready for the long-prayed- for hour,
they formed a National Committee for Fiume and the Quarnaro. The
cup for which they had bravely lived and bravely died was at their
very lips, but it proved to be filled with the waters of Tantalus. But
the bitterness of disappointment only whetted their determination,
leaving their spirit uncrushed, undaunted. Doctor Antoni speaks for
himself and his fellow-citizens. The Editors.
[71]
Jfltwmr
OR THE last twenty years my fellow-citizens and I
have been fighting for the cause of the redemption
of Fiume. During the War, I was one of those put
on trial for implacable Irredentism. How I escaped
the gallows only adds another to the list of unex-
plained miracles. Now I have come to America to
make the true voice of my city heard, and to make it
clear in my official capacity that Fiume craves to be united to Italy.
Fiume is Italian by the blood that flows in her veins, the words
of her mouth, and the burning desire of her heart !
Fiume has always fought against foreign oppression. She was a
part of Hungary, but as a " separate body." Hungary was composed
of three states: Hungary proper, Croatia, and Fiume. The victory
of the Italian Army severed this union and Fiume regained her
independence. On the 30th of October, 1918, four days before Austria
signed the Armistice, Fiume unanimously declared her union with
Italy, thus repeating her own history. For in 1779 she fought against
the proposed annexation to Croatia, and in 1868 obtained recognition
of her peculiar position as a free and independent city, united to
Hungary in a temporary way, but a state in herself.
In so far as her self-determination is concerned, she counts on
the sympathetic encouragement of America. In Fiume all the Mayors,
all the Deputies, the Members of the Municipal Council, of the
Chamber of Commerce, and of the Courts, have always been Italian.
This being the case, they think themselves free to dispose of their own
fate and who can deny them the right of joining their Mother-
Country ?
We hear people say that if Fiume is united to Italy, the popula-
tions of the interior will not have an outlet to the sea. This is not
[72]
FIUME
true. Jugo-Slavia has excellent natural harbors between Buccari and
Carlopago. It is not at all necessary to sacrifice the purely Italian
character of Fiume in order to give an outlet to the interior. It is
interesting to recall that before the War the commerce of Croatia at
Fiume was only 7% of the total commercial output, the rest of the
traffic belonging to Hungary. We are not enemies of the Jugo-Slavs,
unless they invade our territory. Near Fiume they have the beautiful
city of Susak which they may easily and naturally develop and enlarge.
If we can each live within our own boundaries, peace and friendship
will naturally follow.
The Mayor, the President of the National Council, and the Deputy
of Fiume to the Hungarian Parliament were received in Paris by
President Wilson, to whom the situation was clearly explained and the
justice of our national aspirations demonstrated. President Wilson
and the American delegates expressed themselves as profoundly im-
pressed with their significance: it was even triumphantly reported
that the silent Colonel House lifted his voice in their favor.
Fiume has a population of 35,000 native Italians. This popula-
tion rules its own city, and the will of the citizens of Fiume must be
seriously considered. We want to be Italians and Italy wants us to be
Italians. We are like brothers who are at last reunited after centuries
of suffering and struggles.
[73]
mat?
BY
DOCTOR GIORGIO PITACCO
Municipal Councillor of Trieste ; Former Deputy to the Austrian
Parliament
HE HONORABLE Giorgio Pitacco, a Member of the
Municipal Council of Trieste, was a former Deputy to
the Parliament at Vienna. He was thus in a position
for close observation and first-hand knowledge of the
Austrian intrigue for crushing the Italian soul out of
Trieste and Dalmatia. From 1900 to 1910 he
watched the Austrians driving human hordes of
Slovenes and Croats into Trieste solely to outnumber the Italian
census. Laibach was the centre of this Austrian activity which actu-
ally subsidized its hirelings of Slovene business men, agents, and
tradesmen to emigrate into essentially Italian cities, especially Trieste.
This is the true explanation of the sudden disproportionate increase of
the Slav element in the immediate environs of Trieste.
Doctor Pitacco was sent to America by the Political Association
of Unredeemed Italians as their President. This association is com-
posed of all those from the Unredeemed Provinces who succeeded in
escaping to Italy during the War. It has over 10,000 members from
Trieste, Istria, Trentino, Fiume, and Dalmatia. Among them are
eleven Deputies to the Parliament at Vienna, thirty-five Deputies to
the Provincial Diets, and fifty Mayors. The name of the Association
explains itself ; it was formed to crystallize the national determination
of the Unredeemed Provinces. The Editors.
[74]
E HAVE COME to America in this period in which the
future of our Unredeemed Country is to be decided,
to implore the support of the generous American
people. America, who, like Italy, entered the War of
its own accord, for liberty and justice, will surely
not permit the gravest kind of injustice to be per-
petuated in separating from their Mother-Country
provinces which always were, are, and are determined to remain,
Italian.
Trieste, like the rest of Istria, as a sign of protest, refused to send
representatives to the Austrian Parliament, in the hope that some day
they might be able to send them to the Italian Parliament. The
Provincial Diet of Istria, when called upon to elect its Deputies to the
Parliament of Vienna in 1867, replied, " Not one," and dissolved the
meeting. After universal suffrage was introduced, the Italians were
obliged to participate in the political elections and send their Deputies,
in order to defend their national existence and their economic interests.
After 1866, Austrja, with the motive of depriving Italy of every
claim to the territory along the Adriatic Sea, which had always been
Italian, began a systematic plan of destruction of the indigenous
Italian element, in which enterprise she received the effective support
of the Croatians and Slovenes. All the Government offices were
entrusted to the Slavs, to the exclusion of the Italians. In Trieste,
for example, a city with a majority of 200,000 Italians in a population
of 250,000, the whole personnel of the Department of Post, Railroads,
Judiciary, Ports, and Customs, was Slav. The employes were sent
from Carniola, Carintia, Stiria, and from other provinces that had
nothing in common with the city of Trieste, either in language or
customs. In one day alone they transported 700 families of Croatian
and German railroad men, aggregating 5,000 persons in all, to Trieste.
This system, which was carried out further by the order that the
Italians should be deported for every small offense, was intended to
[75]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
secure for the Austrian Government a preponderant number of Slavs
who had been taught to antagonize the Italians. For the same purpose
the census was compiled, using figures so evidently false that the
Central Committee of Vienna could not explain the sudden reduction
of the Italian population from 78:27% to 62:31%, compared to an
increase of 100% of the Slav population. This Committee, therefore,
had to admit that the census was not reliable.
In spite of all this, the Italian character of Trieste was ardently
maintained through the many Italian schools for which the community
of Trieste alone paid an annual sum of over two and a half million
crowns.
Trieste and Istria, which form a geographic whole, have alwavs
loyally demonstrated their great attachment to Italy, especially during
this War. Many thousands of men from Trieste, Istria, Fiume, and
Dalmatia volunteered in the Italian Army. Of these, hundreds died
in action and eight were decorated with the gold medal for extra-
ordinary acts of heroism. All these volunteers faced a double death :
that on the battlefield, and that on the gallows, if they were captured,
as in the case of Nazario Sauro from Istria, Francesco Riamondo from
Spalato, and Cesare Battisti from Trento.
In the Parliament at Vienna, the Italian Deputies have held
memorable debates. The one in defense of the municipal autonomy
of Trieste in 1906, against the decree which deprived the city of its
administrative independence, was particularly famous. Not a single
one of the representatives of the various other peoples which formed
the Austro-Hungarian Empire supported the Italians, with the excep-
tion of the Roumanians, who upheld them in their fight against this
arbitrary act of the Government.
This war has brought into high relief the utter vileness of the
reactionary and autocratic Government of Vienna. It, alas, is not yet
obliterated, since it survives in the hatred of other peoples who are
trying to reorganize themselves on the spoils of Austria.
Throughout the War, the Italian people have displayed wonderful
qualities, on the battlefield and at home. A people whose wounded
soldiers requested the physicians to attend to the enemy first, because
they were more seriously wounded, whose same soldiers offered their
own bread to their prisoners, because they knew them to be more
hungry, are a people who can look the future straight in the face and
await the triumph of Justice over every wicked intrigue.
[76]
RENDITA CONSOLIDATA
NETTO
nl.(S(-i: Miomin.ili -KM DDIIO EFPE11
-ESEML DA IMPOSM. PKIM.NM | FUTURE
k- M)tt(.scri/i(ni - >no dal !5OENNAIOal3FI I
PRESSO IVIIL i, I ILIALI DLdl.l MIFXII Dl I \\hM^M I.
I'RLSSO (ill ISIII\II 1)1 (KM DUO ORDINAkUV II ( ^Sbl
1)1 RISPARMIO I I IU\( HI. !\)l't)l \\<\ I ( ooi'lk' \ll\l I.I
DITTE E SOCII I A hA\( Akli I'XKII.C IIVVM I Al
PER I! EMISSION! Dl I PRI SI MO.
AN ITALIAN \VAK l.llAN
From a drawing by M. Borgonl
[77
[78]
[79]
[80J
BY
FRANK ALLABEN
I
Hail, Italy, kindled
Out of the ash of death !
Italy, bruised and crowned
In glory of thy gashes !
Through seven seals unloosed, into thy book
Of revelation let our wonder look.
War's caustic scours imaginary sight,
And we no longer dream we see
The ghost of Rome in risen Italy
Time's restless apparition walking
The Mediterranean mid-way in a mirage
Whose glitter in the blue mirrors of the air
Seemed but an echo of thy ancient light.
Earth's suffering flesh and blood
Now battle-griefs attest thee,
Even as pangs of war
Revived thee when the Corsican swept by,
And we beheld thee stir,
Disquieted out of silence.
A blind dismembered thing, we watched thee waking
Thy ten disjointed segments; watched their squirm
Within as many tyrannies,
Writhing to knit up seams long ripped and frayed.
Then rose thy orb of empire, lit
Like a new pole-star in the purple north,
Reared on a throne above the Piedmont hills,
Sheer over Savoy's House, whose cry empowered
Cavour's and Garibaldi's, gathering up
Maazini's dream unbroken out of night
Into substantial day.
We watched thy blowing garments
Wing over sapphire seas,
And climb the dreaming airs
Into the golden sun.
We saw thee print upon the Red Sea shore
Thy Abyssinian sandals ;
Snatch from the shoulder of the smitten Turk
Tawny-colored Libya
To gird the loins of thy strength ;
Out of his turban tear
Tripoli's black diamond for thy diadem ;
And stride from isle to isle before
Adalia's slumbering door
To bid thy antique ward, old Asia,
Quit the grey tomb of her antiquity.
[81]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
We heard Marconi's pathless lightnings speak ;
We saw the brawn of thy battleships give
New patterns to the sea.
Yet all thy motions staged a pantomime
That twinkled through our winking eyes
To glimmer in a thought,
A pageant filmed, a marvel screened,
Part posed and part imagined.
What curious thing, half -wraith, half-life,
Could shimmer, half -emerged,
Out of the chrysalis of a thousand years?
Who'll unroll, Italy, thy seven-sealed book?
War, blistering war,
Hell's light of revelation ;
The branding iron of reality
Hot on the quick of the soul !
War stamps thy succoring image
On the coin of our need.
Not war thy Spurred Boot swinging
Hard at the Musselman
But unto us an unimpassioned rumor
Carrying no report
How, in the fevered frame of thy unquiet,
Prophetic intuitions stretched and strove,
Training behind a veil their life-and-death
Struggle with destiny.
Never could war to chip the stony Turk
Chisel thy statue heroic in our heart.
Maniac war reveals thee :
Satan incarnate in gorilla herds,
Mauling the face of man,
The heart of Belgium, and the soul of France,
Resisting, dauntless, like an angel torn,
One shoulder slit and limp.
Justice was smitten on the cheek ;
Faith, being ravished, fainted away ;
The hopes of nations fell ;
The dry lands swayed like seas ;
The age bowed down and trembled, her pillars knocking together ;
The peoples staggered like a drunken man.
Flung out of pillowed slumber, dreaming Peace
Swooned into rigid nightmare, staring up,
Gazing where heaven weighed the quivering earth,
Hung in a balance high above our hope.
Italy, it was then our anguish threw
Out of her black suspense a frantic look
That caught thy noble gesture in the sky,
Casting thy glory's weight
In just neutrality that tipt the scale.
[82]
ITALY REVEALED
That tipt the scale, for out of thy frontier,
Slung from a sling, the hurtled sons of France
The invader smote and stretched along the Marne,
Prone as Goliath in the sling of David ;
While, cruising up the round ball of the world,
Securely ferried through thy friendly seas,
Justice assembled her crusading knights.
As, locked within the firmament, the star
Of hope that jewels morning sudden shines
Out of his crystal casket, so we saw,
Shining through thy neutrality, thy heart.
The Mind that thrills the pulse of kings and nations
Bids, Italy, thy loosed first seal enthrone
Grave-visaged Justice, weighing iniquity.
II
He who thy palsied orbit raised again
Out of the sepulchre of ruined worlds,
Had timed thy perihelion to earth's need ;
And now the event that loosed thy second seal
He nursed in secret through ten bitter months
That travailed in thy soul to be delivered
Of faith, precocious in thy womb
Thy leaping infant, struggling for mastery
Over the interloper, German greed,
With covetous fingers crooked
In surreptitious clutch in the walls of life.
When the gorged dragons, clawing Russia down,
Filled earth with wailing, clang! the clock of God
Began to strike their doom thou, Italy,
God's hammer on the gong !
Yet swift as thy knighted sword
Knelt in the bending vow,
The crouch of the couched panthers sprang,
Fraud and dishonor, flung
At the throat of thy plighted word
To strangle faith in the dust
At the feet of the hope of the world !
God knew His purpose through thy borders walked,
Bringing thy help, hid in a poet's heart.
The whirlwind caught d'Annunzio,
And on the blast he rode
To Quarto hard by Genoa,
Thy people, like the swirling gusts of spring,
Delirious around.
From Genoa thy visionary son
Plowed the unknown till his long furrow burst
Into the hopeful soil of a new world.
[83]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
From thence, to weave up thy unravelled lands,
A new Columbus, Garibaldi, sailed
With his immortal thousand, steering south.
And here God's finger, in a poet's spirit,
Builds thee an altar, o'er whose cry we see
The heavens open and a flame leap down,
Lighting a hurricane of sparks and brands
That blow a roaring furnace in thy soul
Till God forge victory.
To Rome a peril clings, like fallen clouds ;
Out of the north, to Rome, thy tempest whirls
Its purging fiery pillar.
Now let thy poem be, Italy,
Both seen and heard.
Rome weaves through evening's silence her shouted word
Into an insurrection of delight
She weaves a tapestry
Through the warp of the air,
The woof of the patterns of her ecstasy
Dartles and hangs and swings, loud-floating there.
She weaves her torches through the black mat of night,
And thrilling threads of flaring hearts, more bright ;
And into a wild bewildering roar
Her multitudinous shuttles pour
The poet-tribune, mobbed by jubilation,
Wheeled on a chariot-throne of exultation.
What Caesar's Rome
Brought such a pageant home ?
Beyond that chanting blaze
Of light's processional through the slinking dark,
Biilow and his Italian shadow crouch.
The knives cringe back,
The fingers tremble,
Afraid to stab
Thy faith and honor,
Standing circled in the light,
Beyond the dark and his penumbra's blight !
Then, gushing out, thy burning wrath's
Passionate denunciation,
Volcanic through d'Annunzio,
Treason consumes to ashes, fleeing Rome.
'Tis mid-May : ruddy as the morning sun,
Spring, bursting through the winter of the world,
Around thee flings the flaming rose of war,
Fragrant as angels over nightshade use
To put to death the noxious weed of evil,
Red-woven to a scarlet coronal
[84]
ITALY REVEALED
Set in the tresses of mysterious night
Over unfathomable shining eyes.
The second seal stands loosed : thy frowning book
A gleaming messenger of vengeance shows,
Like red coals staring out of cloudy wrath
In at the murderous serpent coiled in man.
Ill
War grips thy mountains at a bound :
Hunting the Hapsburg whelps,
Thy bold Alpini swing from crag to crag,
Fighting earth, air, snow, ice, hunger and man !
Twelve months thy sword victorious climbs the Alps,
A signal in the night.
Thy bayonets prick the Turk, menace the sly
Flesh-eating jackal of Bulgaria.
But Serbia, shattered, Montenegro, mangled,
And bruised Albania, lean against thy finger,
Stretched down to help all three.
And Verdun, sacrificial Verdun, bleeds,
Heaping her altar with the blood of France.
The world stoops faint, in sackcloth, sorrowful.
Like a black mist, discouragement covers the earth.
Only around thy head lives light
Over the northern mountains
Thrown like a halo from the silver band
Of six score ransomed towns that crown thy brow,
Wreathed in a curve from lofty Stelvio
Four hundred miles to Carso's horny beak,
Watching the Adriatic.
Thy hills wear light : huddling to smother it,
The crafty dragon of the Danube shrugs
Her mottled foldings through the Trentino, looped
In gorge and coiled on peak.
Soon as thy war's first year new mid-May meets,
The wyvern strikes thy buckler strikes and strikes,
As furious torrents ram a dam to seize
The shuddering land below.
Thy sons fight, backward staggering, step by step,
To where the verge o'erhangs their homes : there stand,
A rocking barrier on a dizzy brink,
Through May, through June, six weeks, a tumult, scrambled,
Of earth and air and sky and waterfloods,
Armies and rocks and mountains, sweating blood.
Hate, hydra-headed, swarms: two thousand throats,
Arched from the Val Sugana to the Val
Lagarina, five score to the mile,
Bark flaming death and cough up killing gas
[85]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
Out of their black abysses. These have crunched
Antwerp, Liege, Laon, Ivangorod,
And B rest-Li tovsk, strongholds of Belgium, France,
Russia, and Poland. Hooded and puffed, they strike,
Horribly animated to mutilate,
Aching to fang thy right flank from the rear,
And seize and throttle, through her unguarded door,
France, forspent at Verdun.
Flushed stands thy third seal loosed : we see the power
That upheaves towns and crumbles fortresses,
Unanchoring iron out of masoned stone
As Samson tore the gates of Gaza up
See the gross demon of the might of evil
Recoil from Justice, soldiering in man's heart
That foams and gallops, wild and violent,
In the long agonism of good 'gainst evil.
Hell's horror clings through June. In hot July,
Back, snarling, dripping, slinks the baffled fiend,
As, by indomitable Alpini led,
Like flames ascending up a rising wind,
With garlands on their helms, through smiling lips,
Thy irresistible children, Italy,
Scourge with the songs of their spirit, lashing guns
That know not how to answer, being cast
Only to tear the flesh ! The bruised dragon
Flees, rolling up the mountain ; round thy sons
The light of God still walks the shining Alp !
Prefigured in a semblance, here forethrown
On the Trentino, as against a screen,
Thy loosed third seal predicts great wrath to come
The victory of anguish, long dragged out,
Walking the furnace of the forge of God
Toward Italy redeemed.
Often as rushes the swift leviathan
To whelm us through the broken dike of earth,
God thrusts thy spirit, Italy, in the gap !
IV
Three acts have staged their play ; four haste them on.
Thy fourth seal stirs, the number of a man,
Impetuous to begin. Thy left guard stands
In the Trentino, feinting ; like a nerve,
Cadorna swings the right hand of thy power
Across the Isonzo, and Gorizia falls,
As falls Tolmino falls, to rise redeemed.
August is gladdened by that staggering blow.
September sees thee seize San Grado so
Sees thy assistance of her cause
Lift wearied Verdun into a pause.
October eyes thy serpent-cutting sweep
[86]
ITALY REVEALED
Far up and on and into the Carso leap.
November sees thee stun that same plateau
With a new overthrow.
Twice five thy victories in that craggy war
That earth and heaven blots into one scar.
The miracle of human spirit ran
Unloosed in thy fourth seal,
Whose prodigies reveal
The glory of the stature of a man.
By children, women, and by men,
In ice and heat, in storm and sun,
What man can do is done,
Calling the age of exploits back again.
Hail, Alpini, lions of the rocks !
Hail, winged Titans, eagles of the sky !
Hail, Arditti, tigers of the trench,
With bombs and knives and fingers in a throat !
Hail, soldiers, victors on the Alp !
Hail, sailors, conquerors at sea !
Hail, valiant women and heroic children,
, Grinding at your tasks, warring in your hearts !
Hail, King and Queen,
Man and woman glorified,
Battling on the front, fighting at the sick-bed,
Loved in all the land, and honored in the earth !
Hail, Italy, blazoned in the badge of God,
The decoration of a million wounds !
What billows roll the music of that epic ?
What thunders crash the chorus?
Trumpet your psalms, ye Alps !
Create a symphony
Of blending land and sea !
And listen, all ye sons of Italy !
Let San Martino and Cortina sing,
Whose shaggy-gleaming eyes grew eloquent,
Watching their freed kin where your swift advance,
Cracking the iron of the Austrian keep,
Unchained the giants of the Dolomites.
And let the tidal choral, tuned to these,
The Adriatic and Ionian Seas,
Tell how your convoys through their waters sprang,
Steering the Serbs to Corfu and Valona,
Where all our anxious navies learned to foil
Ubiquitous submarines and perilous mines.
Let charmed Zarola out of her thrilling breast
The tempest of a deep contralto fling,
To sing around you, heroes, how she saw
You climb the shoulder of her towering mate
And off the Altissimo of Monte Baldo brush
Crawling invaders like a swarm of ants
Into the vengeful chasm.
[87]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
Ransomed Trieste, tell how, through your soul,
Drooping in bondage to demonic hate,
The wing of expectation flew, as swiftly
Into your port the Istrian Sauro sped,
Swooped down a ship, and like a hawk whirled out ;
So doing, repetitious, till they slew him.
Tune your loud torrents, Monte Pasubio,
And chant the anthem of the gallant fight
That round your loins hung victory for a girdle,
Buying your freedom with a holocaust.
Ring out, Durazzo; chime four different deeds
That awed your harbor on as many days
From four torpedo-boats : how each pounced in,
Devoured a dragon-ship, and soared away.
Hearken, ye engineers ! hark, and rehear
The orchestras of a thousand hills rehearse
The oratorio of a thousand scores
That mid reverberating plaudits sang
Your fearful blowing up of Castelleto.
And listen, while Trieste trills again
Her glee when gallant Rizzo rocked her bay,
Blasting a battle-monster, blowing another,
Gaping and paralyzed, against the sea.
Cry, Monte Cucco, wonderments of May
That made your passion kiss their soldier- feet
That leaped incredibly Isonzo's gorge
And ran up rocky barriers. Pola, sound
Daring as wonderful, when Pellegrini
With only three companions at your feet
A dreadnought slew, torpedoed. Sing, ye joys
Of saved Bainsizza ; every August wake
The prickly hills that stud your thorny plain
Into an anniversary carnival
To vivify again and celebrate
Glorious achievements that the Julian Alps
Perceived with wild amazement! Italy there
Leaped like a cub through Austria's scampering camps,
O'er thousands, prisoner, and, spectre-like,
Stood beckoning on Hermada, o'er the rim
That bristles round Trieste ! Answer, waves
That swim the Adriatic, roll us out
Your song of Rizzo and two motor-boats,
Sixteen heroic men and four torpedoes,
That broke the guarding wall of ten destroyers,
And, killing both the giant dreadnoughts there,
Entombed them in your sheol ! Airy heights,
And steep aerial valleys, dizzy skies,
Rainbows, and high-winds, and ye oft-congealed,
Recuperating clouds, speak out, declare
What human hawks, man- falcons, dove among you,
Hunting their prey ; what climbing seas they sailed,
O'er strongholds throwing down resounding death,
Warning like balanced eagles scared Vienna,
[88]
ITALY REVEALED
Pouncing on ships and ramparts out of skies,
Down-swooping into battle-fields through mists
As lightnings out of storm-clouds riddle earth,
And chasing regiments and skimming trees
Like insect-scooping swallows. Rouse the south,
Freed Monte Santo ; pitch a key to reach
San Gabriele in the north till he
Makes a duetto of deliverance,
Thrilling Isonzo on his lofty tongue
Till all the echoing regions round cry out,
" What bells peal out of heaven?" Let him say,
\Vas not the fight that crashed around his crest,
Lighting a taper through the darkened world,
As if the archangel of his name had sparred
With dense, surrounding, cloudy hosts of hell,
Till Michael, with the swords of God, had come,
Angels and men, blaring on seraph-trumps,
To rescue glory and restore the light?
A limit rims the coinage of man's power,
Though imaged in the mint and die of God.
Yet we man's emblem, in thy fourth seal stamped,
Behold henceforward and forever see
Topping the utmost peak, high over the ledge
That builds the boldest eagle's windy nest,
In dark-limned outlines, man, a sable crest,
On rocks and ice, a black and silver wreath,
Above a field of Alpine snows, the white
Of a shield argent, vast, and issuant
Out of a golden coronet and flames
Of ribs of sunrise curled around his feet
This on thy seal and mountains we behold,
The figure of thy glory on the Alp,
Man's silhouette engraven in the sky !
V
Blow, organ, blow,
Plaintive and slow,
For a world's hope in Italy laid low!
At last our dragging feet, slow trailing thine,
Have pledged our rusted sword, that six months toils
Behind thy spring and summer victories
To build a forge and hammer out our strength.
Then sudden comes the eclipse of thy October
Death's glazing eye, and autumn's.
October feverish in his caving house ;
The last red rush of apoplectic life !
October when the armies of the wood,
Brittle and sallow, fly before the blast !
God tempers with fire the steel of man's spirit.
Handling our edge so tight it only cuts
Our destiny where His grip clenches ours.
[89]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
About to thrust in heat our weapons all,
He flings thy falchion foremost.
Thus, Italy, in thy book,
The brief and index of our cause,
The days of agony begin to write.
Yet if God's anguish angelize our way,
It posts around the end its guard of light.
By double treachery tricked, and double-stabbed,
Great Russia withers fallen, doubly fallen.
And fallen shrinks Rumania at her side.
The dragons, from the carcase of the east,
Swing up their gulping necks,
To swivel every coil around the west
To crack thee, Italy, then France constrict.
As Moses over Egypt stretched the rod
That bred the east wind through a day and night
Into a morning drenched with locust clouds
That quenched with killing pools each greening thing,
So, Italy, from the rod stretched over thee,
Out of the east an ominous rustle scouts,
Lifting a lying tongue among the trees.
A day, a night, and out of whispers blown,
Over the Julian and the Carnic Alps
The dragon of the east wind rears and strikes.
Hissing the startled hills,
She coils and rears and strikes,
As thunders rear and bellow
And coil and roar and hiss.
Glaring among the shrinking trees,
She coils and rears and strikes,
As wicked lightnings gleam and dart
In the tongue and eye of night.
Thy trees are swaying. They exclaim together.
Their souls are afflicted. They are sore afraid.
They cringe from the striker. They bend down backward.
They swerve to heaven. They rock from side to side.
They strain to escape, but they cannot.
The lashings of death rail upon them.
Their veins swell up with poisons of sheol,
Out of the clouds of the blackness of the locusts of the pit.
They sting them to fury. They drive them mad.
Their heads wave together. They tug in frenzy.
They leap. They pitch.
In the sweat of the fear of the strength of their anguish
They wrench their feet out of the earth and crash against the hills.
Thy leaves are flying. They dance before the dragon.
Thy red leaves cry out in the venemous air
Like hearts of men in the torments of hades.
[90]
ITALY REVEALED
Like darting flocks of frightened birds
They shoot the slopes of Monte Nero,
Dashing, swirling, clambering over mountains,
Clamoring among the hills,
Covering the Alps with terror,
Falling in the valleys and choking up the streams,
Where the leap of the locust devours them
Child and maid and the babe with her mother.
Earth mirrors in her grey and ghastly face,
Swung like a pendulum to the swaying rage
That drives thy hurrying leaves, their blighting fear,
Where flying torments never couched in words,
Abnormal as the gouging touch of hell,
Misshapen, foul, distorted warps of dread,
Besplashed with every hue of woe and death,
Yellow as rotting parchments, black as plagues,
Hectic as fevered cheeks round burning eyes,
Red as rashes, white as lepers, speckled as pox,
Grisled as skeletons startled out of tombs
All shapes and tints and attitudes of terror
That out of Caporetto stream and wail
Like flying meteors through a darkened land.
Waving their shadows up above the earth,
Fling all their terrifying ghosts across
The visage of the world.
Let the earth pray. Let Italy fall on her face.
Let the peoples cry out of sackcloth.
Will not the God of mercy hear ?
The King is with his men, his broken heart
Ascending up to heaven, and bending down to the land.
Let God fulfil the promise of the King's name :
Victor " God with us !"
The Queen of her people implores their God,
The soul of her love melted within her,
The lifted hands of her toil crying aloft.
The women of Italy writhe in distresses,
Their hearts poured out into their bended knees.
Fear, ye wicked, the sword of the prayer of faith.
Be strong, Diaz ! Gather the youth of the land together,
The old man, the boy, the straggler broken from rank,
To reen force the rout, to make a stand at the river.
They fly, they wade, they sink, they swim the Tagliamento.
Stand ! stand ! stand ! They fly ; they will not stand.
Be strong, Diaz ! Gather the youth of the land together,
The old man, the boy, the cripple crumpled by war,
To push against the flight, to stand with God at the river.
They flee, they surge, they dive, they splash across the Livenja.
Stand ! stand ! stand ! they flee ; they will not stand.
[91]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
Be strong, Diaz ! Gather the youth of the land together,
The old man, the boy, the angels camping their wrath.
In the azure tent of God the cry of Italy kneeleth.
They come like sheep that leap the wash of the wool at the shearing,
Quavering through the stream, gasping out of the water.
Stand ! stand ! stand on the brink of the Old Piave !
Stand ! stand ! stand ! They pause, they halt, they stand.
The number of their king is there.
The Breaker of Italy's seals hath loosed
The anagram of God-with-man.
They gather ; they lean against God
On the edge of the rim of the river.
Ye bayonets of Britain and France,
Why trench behind the Adige ?
Omnipotence pitches the wall of the land
On the margin of the Piave.
Hail, wall of life, damming death and evil !
Hail, wall of light, firm as the sway of angels ;
Burnished with fire of seraphim,
Incensive, gloriable around,
Numerous-eyed and numberous-winged,
All standing by unseen !
VI
Through frozen winter and unthawing spring
Her frosted courage to the old earth clung,
Or hibernated in a drawled suspense.
Prepare, ye nations ! Lest the earth should say,
" I have delivered me with my own right hand,"
Ye drink of the gall-wine's bitter with Italy,
France and England staggering in the coil,
America unhelpful, until God
On Italy's bank reopen victory.
As the malicious spirit, barred in ice,
Foments his rancor till the homing sun,
Melting the lock, un jails him, and then enters
The freshet's supple body, driven mad
By meditations murderous that pitch
Demoniac fury down the roaring gorge
In a debauchery of destruction ; so,
Out of the Arctic and the icy east
Piling his convolutions' catapult,
With hate so hot it fires the bitter cold,
The homicidal dragon of the north
Sways, preening to the hissing of the blast,
Before the fascinated soul of France,
Whetting the murder of his cruel eyes,
That pop with venom and with cunning glare,
Plotting to seize the vernal equinox
And chariot on its wing across the trench.
He calls his mate ; but, in the fiery menace
[92]
ITALY REVEALED
And blistery grapple of Italy's burning soul,
She dare not swerve a flank nor shift an eye.
\Ve watch our hope in pawn between the dragons
The wedge that splits the forking tongue of hell.
Hold the Piave ! Heart of Italy, stand !
Each sunrise swings a pontoon in the bridge
That we, adventurous like thy Genoese,
To pay his new world's debit to his old,
Build back along the ocean-trail he blazed.
haste ;
We strain, America ! Double your ha
Put spurs to energy ; larrup the task !
What fury howls ? The winds of March wrench out,
And in their lunge the dragon of the north,
From gashed Saint- Quentin, out of racked Cambrai,
Encoils the British vitals, whelmed back.
Brave England buckles. Ravenous, the fangs
Probe to the heart and reins. Bapaume is down ;
Bril falls, and Peronne ; the long-suffering Somme
Is tottering to the fringe of Amiens.
Shall bending Britain break ? Our engineers
Drop spade for gun and die against the gap.
O that our strength were there !
Our boys sit bivouacked : O for ships, the ships
To march them through the sea !
The crusher lags, sheers off the British shank,
Nursing his hurt and cluttering his coil.
Hi mate stirs sibilant to his beckoning hiss.
Italy, cling ! The nations, like a shutter,
Rock on the hinge of their hope,
Swung from the nail of thy valor.
We twist on the nerve of our anguish :
Be swift, America !
What month wails meagre in, bleached with despair ?
Is this young April, darling of the year?
A worm is in the bud. The north wind yells,
Rocking life's cradle to the dragon's stroke.
The unhealed scabs of Flanders, raw again,
Rip, moaning, off their sores.
The British blade from Ypres to Arras shakes,
Crooks at the center to the serpent, props
The soul of England in her bout with death,
Her grim back 'gainst the sea.
The fangs droop baffled, like a criminal
That cannot awe his judge.
[93]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
Italy, watch the saurian ! Blazy-eyed,
Her gorge grows wicked to her mate's distress !
Clench the last ounce ! Over the arching trail
The span thrown out of England, and our span,
Spliced in mid-ocean double-quick, our boys
Swing to France, singing. Lock your clutch and cling !
Hung in a grapple on the river's rim,
Against our agony,
This body raveling from this denuded soul,
We grip the gnawing lizard to our pain !
May throbs in squalling, like the life of man
That, born in rosy buds, breaks swagging down
Into red dews of death. All scarlet wrath,
The great red dragon bloods the bloom of France
From Noyon unto Rheims.
May's pinky whites stain into bleeding crimsons
Around the strangled month her blossoms bleaked,
Her wheat-fields flailed, her vine and terrace swooning.
God save thee, France ! the coils unkink again,
Swimming the Aisne, Soissons enveloping,
Entangling trouble in the ruddied Marne.
One lurch away, unterrified Paris wipes
Hate-snortled virus out of her smarting eyes.
Perched on his cowardice behind war's risk,
A grizzly wraith, the parody of Satan,
In rattling armor clothed, and railing speech,
Champs Hohenzollern, shaking bloody words
Out of his heart, and, off his bloody steel,
A red rain on the earth.
Screw the last nerve to courage, Italy !
One turn of the capstan warps us in.
Our knuckles clamp around the dinosaur %
Like wrath round hell's rim !
May ends in pangs ; June enters, crying out
In pain to be delivered. Cruel midwives,
North winds abrade her, while the embrangling snake
Constricts maternity into violence,
Where, eyes in sorrow, bowing on her bed,
June bears war's monstrous birth of life and death.
Be valiant, Italy, this wailing day
A woe and a deliverance are born.
An omen : Chateau-Thierry sees our sons
Shunt back the death-lunge shot at Paris.
Enraged, that his cankerous fangs
The heart of France should miss,
The monster flags his mate
In a red-slavering hiss.
[94]
ITALY REVEALED.
Look to her, Italy ! Her hatred curls
Round Asiago, smothering his plain.
She spools her wrath round Grappa, strangling him,
With his Ferrara in her winding sheath.
Her covetous fangs lust, lanky, lickerish.
Her tongue laps murder, thirsty as the pit.
Her famished dartings knit across the Piave,
Bridging the banks with needles in thy flesh.
Zenson reels, tortured. II Montello's rent.
The Piave leaks from Capo Sile south.
Her withering poisons cramp thy jerking thews,
And spray thy seeing into cloudy night.
Thy soul recedes from the jar of her impact,
From the sickening thud of her coil on thy chest.
Back over thy spine thy shoulders jut like cliffs,
Their vigor bent like Pisa's leaning tower,
Inclining in a perilous crisis, swaying
Like Pisa's vertigo in a powerful wind.
Thy strength is pendulous : elastic spirit's
Return steers upright, forward, outward, leaning
Far over the Piave, sword inclined
Aslant the cringing dragon, cutting deep.
Thy parched avengement quaffs her, Italy,
Quenched to the hilt at Castalunga.
She's tapped at Zenson, half the spigot out.
Her liquors spurt, more gules than Red-Sea water.
'Tis drink and bright apparel : she attires
Thy hurts in dripping gifts
Clothes II Montello in her scarlet raiment,
The mantle of her blood,
And Capo Sile wraps in crimson garments,
The ebbing of her strength.
Prodigal with the anilines of death,
She stains thy kirtle gorgeous.
The heavens chastise her wickedness,
Rolling their thunders against her ear,
And plumbing her heart with the prongs of lightnings.
They spue her out of their mouth.
With breath of tempests, in spital of storms.
The torrents swarm upon her.
The floods rise out of their bed to maul her.
The passion of the Piave swings his hate,
Sweeping away the bridges, plunging her into wrath.
The river beats her prone, stretched writhing across.
Heaven reproves her with the weapon of man.
She is cupped to the quick ; she moults ;
Her scales peel, scattered ; her flesh flakes off.
Her strained nerve snaps : recoiling through the stream,
Her wounds disturb the red ford of their blood.
[95]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
Listen, ye nations, to the Triumpher, God,
Blowing the clarion of the Alps to thrill
Her hour of victory through the widowed earth !
VII
Under two flaming swords and cherubim,
Stars facing, sun to sun, their amberous wings
Curving plumed shoulders up a goldeny arch,
Thy sixth and seventh seals stand, Italy,
Twin victors, like twin angels double-bloomed
Out of the twin-bud thy fifth seal disclosed,
Of Godhead loaning man His agony
To wrestle darkness on the brink of life.
Thy radiant sixth around her sister sparkles
Her mystic number of the deliverance
Of victory over evil well begun ;
And thy exultant seventh on tiptoe raises
Her number to the glorious cherubim,
To loose the mystery of her warfare finished
Into the sabbath of a perfect work.
The touch of glory instantly unseals
The jeweled swords of five victorious months,
Keen as the eye of the eagle's swooping wing,
Stern as the coals of the wrath the heavens fling,
Warring with war to kill the accursed thing.
July comes, torch and blade. As once his heat
Resolved the charter of our liberties,
And razed the Bastille, melted down off men,
So now the vehemence of his anger smokes
To burn away from freedom another hell.
He sends thee, Italy, his first four days
To scorch the dragon's hope on Monte Grappa,
And bids his sixth day singe the last of her
Off the Piavian delta's wrinkled throat.
The dinosaur, subdued,
On bank and hill and plain
Wails her curdled brood,
Two hundred thousand slain.
The earth throws eyelids wet
Up sparkling into light,
Where Alpine signals set
Judgment's return to Right.
Allies, out with glaives ! advance !
Delve the dragon out of France.
The strangler round the June-scream of his mate
Had flung a coil ; but no coercive cry
Ransacks his succor from her sprawling wound.
Eyeing thee, Italy, out of France, his glare
Lights on thy outstretched valor ramping through
Albania ; sees it swinge his warmate off
[96]
ITALY REVEALED
Vayusa, Malacastra Heights, and, coursing
Astride the Orsum, comb her from Berat ;
And spies her, in the scuffle in the bend
Of the Devoli, south of Elbasan,
Pitched from lozi, Mali Siloves' crest,
Back drooling to the Skumbi.
His bristling fury in its own shadow sees
Thy striplings, Italy, retrieving France :
Three hundred thousand at the thrilling task
Of guardianer of Rheims.
Thy sturdy slips he scowls at olive-tinctured,
Tinting whole forests of our sapling pines,
Dug off the husky slopes of liberty
To reen force the sap and pith of France
And spread a shelter over her despair.
He dare allow no pause to loll against
Our daily thickening of armament.
Ferocious frenzies through his wicked eyes
Dart to impale their newest foes. He throws
His long death-struggle, thrashing in the earth,
The wrenched old planet creaking on her posts.
Four fiendish days and four demoniac nights,
Across the vale of Ardre, Italy,
The bars of thy flesh go banging to and fro,
Pounding the slamming blasts unpacked from the pit.
Four murderous days and slaughterous nights assault
Rheims' coat of mail the interlinking plates
Of Italy's lives where death falls, glancing off
Panoplied Rheims, screened fipernay, masked Chalons.
Four days and nights the gambling dice of hell
Rattle against thy ribs, and lose the throw.
From four climbed days and nights the tide-wave 's pushed
One foot-slip down the ebb. Like Italy's brave,
America's with Gouraud shield Champagne,
Defend Chalons, and, 'gainst the shifting Marne,
Hanging their pluck in the way of the serpent,
Cling to that gate of Paris with their souls,
And almost with the fury of bare hands
Thrust back the outrageous dragon.
The trump of thy June battle, Italy,
Winds through July's stout spirit not in vain.
He gazes past the brazen skies, and sees
Our battle-weight pull down the golden scale,
God's glory in the bowl. Storm-helm and cloud,
That helped the Piave, rage around us now,
Between the Marne and Aisne, spinning our strands
Into the gossamer of the long grey mist,
Drumming to silence our advancing noise
With gun-fire out of heaven.
[97]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
God weaves us into the night and wet
Till the tangled serpent swings in our net.
Out of the pillar and cloud of God,
Mangin, Petain, Foch, and France,
Pershing, and America,
Thunder the dragon to the sod,
Javelined with lightning's lance.
God's hammers clang him there,
Writhed in a gnarled despair,
Against the anvils of the steel of Italy.
By day, by night, in his flaring forge, July,
Blowing his fires pitiless-high,
With iron mallet on the warping thing,
Rimmed to our hoop of scathing arms that sear it,
Around, against our incensed ring,
Pestles the dragon's bulk and spirit.
The blazing wrath of sweating August swears
A shriveling vengeance to sear out his stain,
Blotched four years past, when hydrophobic hate,
Snapping among the dog-days, bit them mad,
Gnashing the whole world into crazy war.
August has weighed our metal, peering through
The gadding curtains of the skies : he knows
What bayonets our marching sea-lane throws,
Three hundred thousand, unto each new month.
These in a wracking avalanche he crashes,
And Soissons, salvaged from the crusher, lives ;
While the maimed demon, skulking from the Ourcq,
Where fighting palls him, twists around the Vesle
His snarled resistance in a knot of rage.
Where murder's garroting loop rubs Amiens,
Fierce August stokes the furnace of his wrath
Under the grill of Haig's men, flamed to crisp
The creeper's edge with broiling bars, that spark
The prairie boys of Illinois afire,
Inflammable sons of Lincoln and of Grant
That smelt the ebbing monster off Chipilly.
Norward the conflagration chars the coil,
Crackling from strangled towns, out of whose corses
Marred Bapaume, blemished Noyon haggard ghosts
Faint back against the scrawny arm of France.
August, well done ! Thrust red between thy tongs,
Fear's hot coal scalds the leathern heart of hate,
Where Hohenzollern's throne haunts him, aslope.
What sable-plumy crest
Waves war-cry ? 'Tis September's,
Whose unavenged unrest
Through four black years remembers
Horrors, whose great welts are
[98]
ITALY REVEALED
Ridged throbbant through his heart, an ulcering scar.
He watched the hideous heel advance,
Dripping the crunch of Belgium's bones,
Swaggering on the breasts of France,
Grinning through her groans,
Almost wading to his lust,
The grinding into blood and dust
Of the old-young face of Paris.
Always his days have greedily recalled
How through the Marne grim Jof f re that horror mauled ;
And, angel of the avengance of the Somme,
He waves the scorpion of Britain on.
It stings: Peronne's redeemed. It flogs a breach
In the red boa from Drocourt to Queant.
We gash the curling mangier past the Vesle ;
And, from the Oise to Rheims, with France we shear
And tear and fold it, ragged, back to Conde,
Like tailors ripping cloth.
Verdun's vendetta cries : September nods ;
And, swift as words, the knights of Pershing whip
The serpent's crook off Mihiel at a crack ;
And grip it in the Argonne, snake and den
And jungle lashing through the earth and sky,
Choked in our clutch to cling to crime's convulsion
Till death has rattled through it.
These are the days of over-tortured earth's
Recovery out of shell-shock, morn by morn
Hearing the whetstone on God's rhythmic scythe
Mowing the haunch of murder back to hell.
The ardors of thy reapers, Italy,
In these crusading tasks to gather France
Out of the abyss, from dawn to dawning toil
Even as thy stamina on the Piave's marge
Makes what is possible.
And eastward now September
Invokes the fellowship of thy limber arm
Against a cunning beast, and, lo,
Thy aid heaps up the Macedonian blow
That drops Bulgaria's red tool into woe.
And a far crash the gibbering Turk appals :
Down through his crumbling empire's sagging walls,
Out of his hand, ancient Damascus falls.
Striding up the mirrors of the sky,
October's red-gold torch and brand flare nigh.
Yet ere he quits, September's ire must try
To break the Hindenburg line,
That never has budged for man or gun or mine.
[99]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
Ho, Italy, they come : black-diamond eyes
Flash Italy from these yellow strings of beads,
Threaded on khaki, charging for New York
The high, uplifted giant of the skies
That swings earth's western gate toward liberty
Above the crouching nations.
They'll crack old Hindenburg, or their own hearts.
They run, swerve, fall, creep, lift, trip, stagger, stumble,
The sons of freedom in the twisting snake,
Spectral, before, around, behind, among them,
A Proteus, up from subterranean lairs
His helly forms all simultaneous rearing.
No sooner do we think the battle won,
Than new fangs stab our flanks that, wheeling, see
Dizzy eruptions through the old cracked earth
The virulent eczema of the oozing pit,
Inflamed in all its pores, exuding fiends.
So seeing, still we fight, fall, creep, up-stagger,
And, falling, creeping, staggering, fight until
The Hindenburg line drops broken into hell.
Italy, taps ! the frosted plume commands :
October, gorgeous in his golden mail,
Remembering Caporetto.
Taps ! prepare a toil with rest ;
Then, up at reveille.
Leaping with conquering dreams,
Make real what but seems,
Ripping the dragon's crest.
The eye of his purpose set to Italy's clock,
By slaying the saurian to doom her mate,
October drives the dragon of the north,
Dragging Saint-Quentin from the haggled snake,
And tattered Cambrai, shrunk Laon, and Horns,
And Ostend, Lille, old Douai, and their kin.
Straught Belgium, in her right mind rearrayed,
Sits in the gates of Bruges, her coasts redeemed,
The streaming fragments of the smotherer's power,
Like a great fungus, creeping toward the north,
Save where our sons in Argonne-Forest latch
Hate's throat in death and hem his heart in judgment.
Leaving the strangler in our stricture caught,
On Caporetto night, loud trumpeting,
Dripping blood-crimson flame, October's sword
Flares on the Brenta and the glad Piave.
Up, Italy ! with the wrath of heaven
Sickle the great deliverance given.
Judgment, thundering out of Monte Grappa,
Leaps roaring on the rocks of Asiago,
Under the gleaming eyes of startled night,
[100]
ITALY REVEALED
Who springs awaka, her black flanks on the mountain
Plunging like frightened steeds.
A palsied rumble grips the throat of earth,
Coughing and hiccoughing a sanguine death
That clutters and coagulates the air.
The dragon rolls from sleep,
Pitched out by noises and a noxious hail :
Hissing and belching like the smudgy pit,
She murderously wraps the Italian armies,
Their tussle tramping down the shuddering dark.
The hours behold it, muttering to heaven,
While night, grown paler, down the mountain roams,
Moaning against the woods,
Entangling in her hair the shivering trees.
The eyelids of the morning, red and sore,
Lift heavy out of vigils, opening slow
The eye of day, all bloodshot, draggling garments
Splashed and bedabbled in the blood of earth.
He stares upon the foes, too strung to know it
His light enrages them : their tearing sinews,
Streaking the sky with splots of splattering death,
Make day more hideous than savage night.
Let wickedness rumple this plateau and peak,
Light locked in darkness, day in night, until
The dragon's throes drip limply, trickled thin
As sievy earth sifts seeping rains ; until
The number here of Italy's fated sons
Is twenty thousand perished, and the hurt
Groan; sixty thousand souls.
The army of thy right hand's picking up
The islands of the Piave, Italy,
While two of thy armies strain, amphibious,
Sagging from either bank down through the river.
Why do the heavens weep around the battle ?
And why does the flood let swollen eyes o'erflow
The bridges, crashing through his tears,
Leaving thy hope imperilled ?
But God sends courage where
Pent Italy might despair.
His anger's not in nature, as before,
And courage can pry open her shut door.
He bids thy engineers rebuke the river,
Arguing in the friendly mask of night,
Under the stingings of the demonian hiss ;
And bridges rise, and swim : thy armies cross,
And firm, with legs astride the Piave, fight
Like two great pillars of a mighty land.
[101]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
The dinosaurus sways deceived,
Caught in the vail around her heart,
The cunning of her fire-eyes steeped
In folly straight before her.
She winds up her strength on Monte Grappa,
Mindless of the winding fingers
Coiling round her coil like death round death.
But, wondering at her, under eager brows
Valdobbiadene sees it from afar ;
And bright Solize sees it, peeping out
Over the edges of her shining bank.
Under October's mask of golden haze,
Diaz deceived her with a regiment,
Sons of Ohio and the woods of Penn,
Whose daily march of new accoutrements
Out of Troviso, stealing in at night,
Aroused the laughter of the Carnic Alps,
To see the dragon damped and Italy thrilled
With courage as our Blobdingnagians take
The stature of three hundred thousand men.
They leap the Piave, and the saurian broods
Scurry ghost-haunted through Venetia
And into the Tagliamento plunge their fear,
Chased by the armies of one regiment.
The Slinger hurls thee, Italy, out of His wrath
Straight to the heart of the cause and guilt of the war.
Thou hast trapped the black night in the mountains
And broken her flank on thy wheel,
Heaving the power of her crest
Into the valley of retribution.
October sings over the peaks,
Across the plains, and the valleys of rivers,
Dragon's-blood splashing on tree and bush.
Her scales, that swim on his blade,
Fly into the air like sparks of rainbows,
Sprinkling forest and thicket and grass
Green and yellow and red scales,
And brown and speckled and crimson.
The leaves clap hands, and laugh at themselves,
In pied costumes of scales and blood
As in a day of carnival.
They sing the song of her judgment,
Strumming on the wind.
Dancing showers rinse out of the sky
The memory of Caporetto ;
And the good old sun walks out, all tenderly
Leaning on his daughter, Italy,
Touching her sorrows with the hues of heaven.
[102]
ITALY REVEALED
The old and new months in the midst of work
Swap saddles in the field,
One loth to quit, and one imperious
To glut his vengeance to a sudden end.
Done in too bright a flash for mortal eye !
Without a lull in battle, swerve, or blench,
Or jar, where Diaz and his armies sweep,
October's gone November's crashing blade
Gallops the charger, furious as he.
Abrupt November arms eleven days :
Three at both dragons' throats, eight more at one.
With double falchions, forged for double tasks,
Three victoring days serve France and Italy,
A sword in each ; and in the Meuse-Argonne
The serpent's power is broken in the neck,
And keen Americans like greyhounds lope
To spill his death-wound there.
Around the dinosaurus, Italy,
Three knighted days with flashing falchions leap
From peak to peak, and down thy river banks,
Where the Piave and the Brenta wind
Their ribbons out on sea-spools ; chasing death
Off Monte Grappa, Monte Pertica,
Montello, and their fellows, driving her
Down off the ridges to the Piswe's brink;
And off Fonzazo and Quero, thrown
Into the vale between ; and, northward, sweep her
Off Monte Baldo, through the Valle Arsa,
From Revereto, out of Trento ; scourge her
South-easterly across the recovered plains
And ransomed valleys of Venetia,
Beyond Belluno, and beyond Udine,
Thrilling Trieste with her dream come true,
And freeing Pola, singing to the sea
Leaping from vales to hills, from peaks to valleys,
Unmanacling the towns, unchaining rivers,
November's vengeance and his firstborn days
Destroy the dragon and unhook her spoil,
Seizing a half a million of her brood
Alive, and piling up a countless dead
On the heaped mountains and in choked ravines,
Like lost leaves out of tempest-stricken woods.
The end is come
Of guilty centuries of greedy wrong :
Surviving victims and dead martyrs strow
Their exultations on her whimpering woe.
The dragon of the Danube,
That through thy mountain rolls,
Red-writhing in her death,
[103]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
Doth she repent our slain souls,
In her expiring breath?
The strange amalgamation of old hates
Undoes her metals : see,
Out of her crumbled thigh and belly gush
The swallowed nations, free !
'Tis done ! 'tis done !
Down the angelic sky
Let a hymn cry,
" The war is won ! "
'Tis done ! November, in a peal of lights,
Flares eight days thundering round the rim of France,
Through Flanders-field, through clanging Belgian gates,
Through Argonne, crashing to avenge Sedan,
And war is done, the dragon of the north
Whining for mercy under the peoples' feet.
What's in the earth? a storm of shooting stars?
The splitting skies shed crowns and royalties :
By scores, disheveling the firmament,
Princes and dukes and kings and emperors
Shell, parachuting out of tipsy thrones,
Their dribbled glories frayed to purple sparks
That fade in transit like the meteor's flit
The best decoronation earth has seen.
The peoples slack a sigh through every town :
Out of the muffled years they slip ungagged ;
They smile ; they laugh ; they hum ; they sing ; they pour
Into the streets like bees at swarming-time,
And shout, grab one another, dance, and yell,
Old men up-kicking heels like yearling colts,
And stately dames kidnapping strangers, shying
Like skittish two-year-olds down crazy streets,
Entangled in confetti, jangling bells,
Tooting tin-horns, and murdering fifes and drums
In wild delirium, under twitching stars
That rub their poor old orbs at giddy earth.
Glee's dizziest madcap fits the world to-night.
Dance on, dear flighty peoples ! life has been
Four years suspended at the tip of hell,
Swung from an eyelash nay, the gossamer thread
Of God's eternal goodness. Dance and sing,
And loose the heart's thanksgiving, psalming Heaven !
'Tis over acted, done !
Blue-gold, the avengeful sky
Wipes his red weapon into the sheathing cry,
" The war is won ! "
[104]
ITALY REVEALED
VIII
Here wrath should end. But what fantastic voices,
Like leaves that rattle grave-yards windy nights,
Chatter and screak their antique selfishness,
Till ghostly gabble troubles up an age
We thought long buried under ugly scars
In dark unfathomable hates of war?
Is sense jarred out of cue ? Ears think they hear
The old snake-charmers of the Senate Chamber
Beat veto tom-toms and howl incantations,
Lest earth eclipse war with a League of Nations,
And, clipping strife and battle, shear
His wiggeries off the baldness of old greed.
Howl, old dwarf's fistful of anachronists !
Make earth stand still, or trundle back an age !
Is this our world late squeezed, by the skin of her teeth,
Wet-mangled through such agonies as we think ?
Has war toiled incommensurable war
Four years, destroying earth ; or do we dream,
Or waken out of madness?
Surely, we dream. It is not possible
Freedom has spokesmen so insensible
To the world's need, guides so impervious
To the world's light, as to swing brazen tongues,
Where honorable law is weighed, to sully men
Out of man's obligation toward mankind
With words that shame us with their nude appeal
To all that 's basest in what 's crooked in us !
Back from crusading, must America
Suffer in audience, assoiling her,
The same old dragon's hiss of selfishness
She sailed away to punish ?
Or is this crawling tickle in our ear
Only the rattle of the dragon's tail
That like all tails of new-killed snakes, boys tell us
Wriggles till sundown ?
Freedom needs thy example, Italy,
And thy devotion to it.
Thou'rt both a builder of the League of Peace
And one of the chiefest pillars of her house,
Like thy Columbus, seeking a new world
To demonstrate the earth a globe of hope.
Be ever hope our enterprise, that news us,
Vigorous, Italy, alike in thee
And thy discovery, America,
Oldest and youngest of the mightier powers !
Or has thy new bud made the old the youngest ?
Then, Italy, if we lag, let thy resurgence
[105]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
Rebuke us out of the youngest face of nations,
Risen to serve, the springtide in thy heart,
More human than old Rome !
For 'tis in sacrificial scars of service
No longer faithless, unbelieving, but
With our own trembling wound-prints thrust in thine
We know thee, what thou art, one risen indeed
From earth's dark tomb of thousands of years of strife.
'Tis not old savage war thou wearest now
His murderous, dripping, black-red coronet.
Thou art not crowned of hell,
In the damned glamors wreathed of cursing night,
But throned with holier spell,
Transfigured in the sorrowy scars of Right.
What scalding centuries burn
Hell's lesson in, we learn !
As children, dancing to a vivid snake,
Applaud his vicious lunges, like a game,
We, fascinated, clap war, when his fangs
Through Caesar or Napoleon venom earth,
Though ruinous through lands the charmer glides,
With endless murder in his wicked gleam.
War drafts our virtues and our faults, and adds
Nothing to virtue but degrading dust,
Save war that is crime's strict and just police.
Courage, our soldier-epaulet, we wear
With bulls and dogs and game-cocks, volunteers
That stake a life in battle quick as we,
And pour it out defending what they love.
Courage to risk life in the killing of it
Breeds boldest criminals. 'Tis not too nice
To march with honor, as to charge with vice :
The braveries of the battle-legion ken
The noblest and the wickedest of men.
War drafts and kills, but cannot father valor.
War coins no courage ; but the drill of war
Is the great counterfeiter of brave coin,
And passes it, coin current, in the field.
Men, vised 'twixt death and death, war's disciplines
Compel to bout death's chance-jaw at their front,
To void death's sure jaw at desertion's rear;
Whence trapped compulsion dons the helm of zeal.
War little edifies the officer
Who clamps his regiment in gyves of death,
And serves the canons of his killing art
The more he screens himself behind his men,
Great safety growing with high rank, that grabs
War's glory in inverse ratio to hazard.
This ignobility brave shoulder-straps
[106]
ITALY REVEALED
Often transgress by risks almost a private's,
And even war blushes to upbraid them for it.
Its stains of cowardice, birth-marking war,
Suggest the inventor the hallmark of hell.
Unscrupulous strategy, war's chief est boast,
Gambles with tricks, plots inequalities,
Plants ambuscades, schemes overslaugh with numbers :
The tactics of the wolf-pack, and its glory.
War turns us wolves, and drives out nations, packs
That kill by multitudes, a crime in one man.
Crime, multiplied by nations, equals glory !
Murder retailed is crime ; wholesaled, good war !
O hypocritical, inglorious war,
Red, baseborn, bullying cub of violent hell !
Cain taught one-handed murder : thou hast coached us
To multiply it by ten million men
And all our sciences, geared up to kill !
War is the sheriff, or the criminal ;
Murder, or retribution's sword run through it.
Four years in pawn to anguish, earth would pump
Out of her system war, the asp of ages.
Let sheriff war end war, the criminal,
Wry-necked in hangman law's avenging knot.
All just war 's circumscribed within the sword
Of justice, law, and right ; who glorifies it,
Bejewels the hangman. Other war is Cain's,
At Abel with a hell's-brand : kings and peoples,
Who crown them with it, wear the bands of hell.
Only in sheriff's badge can strategy
Serve -honorably an honest deputy
Of the reign of law, who, using strategems
To save good lives, none handcuffs unawares
Save crooks, whose stock-in-trade is tricking justice.
Constabulary warfare, Italy,
Wracking all precedents of the shock of battle,
With body, soul, and spirit thou hast waged
To the extremity of an ardent people,
To pay a priceless ransom for the sins
Of centuries, and get the world reprieved.
Thy heroism was not
In twilight courage, where the unspirituous beast
Takes death without a speculation in it.
Thy half a million lives, that guled thy altar,
Wrenched open-eyed, gold day, and weighed in light
Life's estimation, highest when they gave it,
In passionate despair, that earth might live.
O they were not deceived ! not when they knew
[107]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
That sin had found us all out, suddenly,
And not the Teuton only, trapped in crime.
'Tis easy to confront the wretch and judge
The deed our guilt has no investment in.
But to" be striking at a hideous thing
That is our mirror with our image in it,
Our image magnified, but only to
The logical conclusion of our ways ;
For freedom, life, and light, and hope, to wrestle
Our own tough wrong of immemorial days ;
To agonize with Satan, yet to fight
Our hearts, ourselves, our fathers' fathers' guilt,
Knowing no people 's clear, no land 's acquitted :
O this is cruel, cruel ! for the doubt
If God can choose us starts a leaking wound
Whose siphon lets the courage of the soul.
To the full house of earth war staged his play,
Whose first scenes spoke their lines with double sense,
Their portents waiting in the wings their cue
To out their horrors in the more fearful acts
Staging behind the drop-scene. Actors played
New parts from day to day without rehearsal,
Feeling death's terror as they spoke his lines,
Falling upon his dagger. Thousands stood
Spectators only till insatiate war
Made the whole house his stage, peoples and theatre
Emblazing in a slaughterous hell of wrath.
Ere God's white flame enlightened war's red glare,
Millions expired in dread and mystery,
Hoping they played their death-scene not in vain,
But perishing in the hope.
So died they, over brain and heart baptized
Into the agonies of God's strange work
Of necessary judgment.
What tragedy, pitiful, sleeps with our slain!
There must be in the Heart upholding all hearts
Through infinite tragedy, beyond our ken
A terrible compassion for our dead.
Can God be merciful to the greed that ever
On earth proposes wicked war again ?
A passion haunts me that could choke that thing,
In king or politician, rave it down
Out of its coil accurst, and crumple it
Into the shadow of an ended snake.
This war 's the nailing of God's heart afresh,
Penumbral round the umbra of His cross
In Whom we live and move and have our being.
As beats the word of His power through all that is,
Felt in the wind, seen in the flower, and heard
[108]
ITALY REVEALED
On trilling boughs, in children, in ourselves
Experienced in each pulse of heart and brain,
So, groaning through all sickness of creation,
His are the burning Eyes of every fever,
The dying Heart of all we kill in war.
Our reckless centuries have been more callous
To God's bruise even than to the hurt of man,
Though Heaven's heart He lowered out of glory
One hour to show us while grief lasts God is
The God of sorrows and acquainted with grief
Beyond the sum of all the sons of men.
As God is, we beheld Him, on His shoulder
Bearing our cross, and made its Curse for us ;
And now we see Him newly-nailed to war ;
For Love's eternal life, let down from heaven,
Is, as it ever was, in sorrows, chief.
Gashed with war's million wounds, war's million deaths
He dies in the dying, mourns them in the living,
And in the wicked, the aggressors, groans,
Bearing the contradiction of their sin.
The tragedy and waste of war outreaches
Its only compensation to him it teaches
To see Love's crucifixion on earth's cross,
The Weeper over every soldier's grave.
A beauty lingers on the lids of death,
A glory in God's anguish writhing there
In wistfulness so sorrowful despair
Seems like, or near that other hovereth.
Broken, our dust and spirit cling to God's breath ;
Yet as we break we seem to see Him stare
Into eur wreck upon His finger, where
Our life lies in her ashes, as He saith.
Our grief we know : the Infinite Woe That stands
Silent we'd guess if our poor children lay
Crumbled in our just government to clay,
And dust of some in other, sweeter lands
Our passionate hearts could clutch with eager hands,
But some we never could regain that way.
O Italy, if the Agonies Divine,
More tortured by this war than all the world,
Can lift us into faith out of such sorrow,
Thy half a million have not died in vain.
But all is lost, and nothing can avail,
If Christ be not the Hero of this war,
The true Prometheus, staked to all our woes
In bringing the fire of God's love to man.
To give this flag or that some paltry acre,
Who'd spill the bright red cup of one man's blood ?
But to maintain earth's light of God is worth
All that man's Lover lets us pay for it.
[109]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
It well becomes us to exhort our hearts
To search the price of peace heaven weighs us at
Since every mystery of life and death
This wild war dangles in its savage bud.
There 's not a people shares this planet's mercy
That has not sowed the seed war's red scythe reaps.
Should God mete Germany unmercied justice,
Which of us could that inquisition bear ?
We have been saved, but in a great rebuke
Shaming all calls for penance that yield none.
Even as the tribes that punished Benjamin
Were sold in battle to his sword by God,
So Justice in this war brands the most guilty
In a hot chastisement that scores us all,
Warning our past, our present, and our future,
Of the curst pharisee in every heart,
Ready to act the Cain condemned in others;
And warning skepticism, that sold our day,
Like Judas, to this cross of war, God is,
And will, at any cost to Him and us,
Require our evil, and regard His throne.
Thank Him, He is, lest hell engulf the earth
Forever and forever. Hark, ye peoples,
And hear the rod ! let sorrow teach our sin !
Let there be hope where God has written books,
'Scriptures of sorrow, in the nations' hearts !
There, Italy, a gospel to the world,
Against the midnight black of war and death,
Engrossed by Him Who loosed thy seven clasps,
The apocalypse of thy existence stands,
Lettered without and in, an unsealed book.
Here, in thy palimpsest, lately recovered
Out of the catacombs of former things,
Papyrus of a nation old yet new,
Inscribed in characters Love's hand has traced
With glorious illumination-work,
We read thy sufferings, and read with hope.
Yet, bleared with blood-stain, be thy seven-leaved book
Only by reverent, trembling fingers took !
God crowns His warrior. Italy, we see
His diadem arraying thee :
Victorious Anguish ! Agony glory-crowned !
Hail, Italy, blazoned in the badge of God,
The decoration of a million wounds !
Thy coronet of glittering scars
Is brighter than a wreath of stars ;
Thy gold was beaten out of infinite woes ;
Thy jewels all reflect
[110]
ITALY REVEALED
Lustre of service, rainbowed over death,
Flashing the lights of heaven uneclipsed.
Thou art our token, out of tomb and pall,
That God can bring a people from their fall
And make their life peal out a nobler chime.
O never be apostate to His call !
Swing the Torch upward to the last steep of time !
Build God Whose toiling visions raise
Thy slumbers, Italy, from the dead
A new cathedral's climbing praise,
With pillared vault and arching spread
Of psalms by raised-up nations said !
Beauty of use and service-stars avow,
Purer than Rome's thy glory risen now.
Some olden dreamer of the golden age,
Met somewhere in thy sleep, we know not how,
Endorsed his promise on thy rising page.
And since God gave thy newer birth
To lure us from our selfish grip,
Let sacrifices still equip
And knight thy serviceable worth,
Till violence learns from stronger ruth,
And all the daughters of the earth,
Some image of thy sheen to win,
Some radiance of Serving Truth,
God in the hand, as on the lip,
Come climbing up thy ways, to dip
The garments of their service in
Thy fountain of perpetual youth.
[in]
SItttroltt'a SUrogtttiton of 3ialg'0
anfc ^ts |Irapr for
of
A0ptratiottH
a Urttar, Uritfrtt ntt lulg 23, 1064, hg {imttostt Htnrnlw ta
S^rtinattt. Jtaliatt
AM free to confess that the United States have, in the
course of the last three years, encountered vicissitudes
and been involved in controversies which have tried
the friendship and even the forbearance of other
nations, but at no stage in this unhappy fraternal
War, in which we are only endeavoring to save and
strengthen the foundations of our national unity, has
the King or the people of Italy faltered in addressing to us the lan-
guage of respect, confidence and friendship.
I pray God to have your country in his holy keeping, and to
vouchsafe to crown with success her noble aspirations, to renew, under
the auspices of her present enlightened government, her ancient
career, so wonderfully illustrated in the achievements of art, science
and freedom.
[112]
[113]
OX THE " GUAPPA"
One of the most bitterly contested sectors of the Italian Front
ITALIAN "AIIDITTI " OPKUATINK A MAClllNK
GUN
[114]
Flt'MK
TIIK 1-M.oTII.l.A f.MMAM>i:i> I'. V A I M I ISA I, M 1 KAIU-M.l.n A I'I'KoAt 'II I \i J 1JSSA
[115J
WELCOMING THE KIN<} OF ITALY ON HIS AKIMVAL AT TIMESTE
AKK1VAL OF HIS MAJESTY, THK KING OF ITALY, AT TIMKSTK. NOVEMBER 10, 1918
[116]
Jtalg'0 (iratt Hlork in Albania
BY
BRIGADIER -GENERAL GEORGE P. SCRIVEN, U. S. A.
Military Observer in Albania
HAVE seen many things especially in the little-known
regions of the Balkan Peninsula which deserve the
attention of thinking people, and will, I am sure,
receive it, if only I can properly draw the picture.
I have grown to know much of the officers and men
of the Italian Army and have learned to add to the
respect and liking inspired by them in peace a warm
admiration for their conduct in war, not only as fighting men, the first
purpose of the soldier, but as leaders and instructors of the non-
civilized peoples, whose countries they have been called upon to govern.
It is to fierce, impoverished Albania, lying beautiful but unknown
within sight of the very shores of Italy, that her soldiers have come as
a blessing, much as the American soldier twenty years ago came to the
Philippines, first to fight an enemy, then to redeem a people and to
build up a nation. Like the American, the Italian has for three years
been fighting an enemy with one hand, while with the other he has
guided a people along the road of improvement and uplift.
In regard to the Balkan Peninsula it will be recalled that the
Turk a people much better than his always impossible government-
held sway over the country until the year 1912, when this Old Man of
the Sea was driven back probably forever to, and perhaps beyond,
the Golden Horn.
A time of quiet and progress then appeared about to dawn upon
the Balkans, especially upon Albania, whose people were recovering
from the wretchedness imposed by the Balkan wars and were hoping
to enjoy peace with self-government, when a confused struggle for
control of the country broke out, a sort of Donnybrook Fair of the
neighboring nations, which again brought Albania to chaos. The
Powers interfered, and at the instigation of Italy it was decreed at the
London Conference that Albania should become an independent state,
of which the boundaries were outlined. In early March, 1914, Prince
[117]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
William of Wied landed at Durazzo to put himself at the head of the
government. Almost immediately another revolution broke out, insti-
gated from without, it is said, and the Prince of Wied, with no army
and no money, failed to quell the uprising, and in the attempt was com-
pelled to flee from Durazzo, which he did on the 3d of September,
1914, after a wretched reign of six months. Essad Pasha, a descend-
ant of the celebrated Ali Bey, raised the flag of Scanderberg and was
proclaimed and I believe acknowledged as Albania's head, but Essad
disappeared.
The great war broke out and the troubles of the little peoples of
Europe were swept away in the whirlwind that gathered over the
world. No one knew or cared about the fate of the Prince of Wied,
nor much about that of Albania. But the Italians, though still neutral,
were watching the course of events in Albania, and in December of
1914, as a wise precaution, sent the Tenth Regiment of Bersaglieri to
occupy Valona, a little fishing village on the shores of a magnificent
bay.
The winter passed quietly in watchful waiting, but after a time
Italy found it necessary, on account of the attitude of Greece, then
under the influence of its Germanophile King Constantine, to take
more active measures. Consequently, between August and the middle
of October, 1915, Italy sent additional forces to Valona, and from
there, at the request of the people, and without violence, occupied suc-
cessively Tepeleni, Chimara, Santi Quaranta, Arjirokastro, Premati,
and Liascoviki all towns of importance in Albania; and owing to
the disturbed conditions the troops went south as far as Janina, and
extended the line of occupation eastward along the old Turkish high-
way to Ersek.
The town of Valona before the occupation was a pest hole of mud,
mosquitoes and fever, but around it are magnificent and extensive
groves of olives, commanding hills and pleasant and fertile valleys.
It was soon evident that Valona, on account of its position and
harbor, must become not merely the Italian military base, but the seat
of government. Soon streets were paved, hospitals, electric light and
ice plants installed, and well-made motor roads run out to the important
advance positions. In addition, the back country was opened up and
a fine highway built across mountain ranges to the east, joining the
ancient, now destroyed, town of Tepeleni with Arjirokastro and the
old Turkish road, still in existence, leading thence across Albania and
Macedonia, to Salonica, nearly four hundred miles away. This work
[118]
ITALY'S GREAT WORK IN ALBANIA
was necessary from a military point of view, but it was also of lasting
value to the country, and other projects for the benefit of the people
were commenced. Civil hospitals were opened, buildings assigned for
the use of prefects and courts, school houses built, and even a cemetery
for the Moslem dead was laid out to induce these people to give over
their custom of burying their friends at the doorstep.
But perhaps the greatest of the works done at this time by the
Italians was the construction of a road some eighty miles in length
along the Adriatic, from Santi Quaranta by Porto Palermo to Valona.
This road runs for much of its distance high above the sea, along the
edge of steep precipices at whose feet far below lie pretty sandy coves
extending into fertile valleys, beautiful, but unpeopled. Then zig-
zagging up the mountains, with turns like a fish-hook, it juts out upon
spurs looking far away over the blue Adriatic toward Corfu perhaps,
or towards the distant shore of Italy, and climbing to the snows disap-
pears in the clouds. This highway which the Italians have given to
Albania and to the world is far more beautiful than the Corniche of
the Mediterranean and will one day become more celebrated.
It was my fortune to be invited to accompany General Ferraro
at its opening, and the journey gave me the opportunity of observing
the attitude of the Albanians towards the Italian. This was an atti-
tude of respect, one even of affection. Everywhere were demonstra-
tions of welcome ; arches were thrown across the road ; school children
presented some small address, or offered a little song; houses were
draped with flags .or eastern rugs; country men and women, priests
and soldiers, all gathered to greet "Our General," as he was called, and,
indeed, he seemed to be their general and their friend. To him the
women came freely to seek some favor for father or brother or husband
in trouble, and always their petition was given a kindly hearing, what-
ever the result. Beside the road, here and there as we passed, stood
long lines of Austrian prisoners who had done a great part of the
labor. They looked patient, but not cheerful, but as prisoners of war
their lot did not seem a hard one. Certainly their work was useful
and they were treated by the Italian officers with the most scrupulous
courtesy.
I have no time here to discuss the many other works of material
improvement performed by the Italian army in Albania. Their efforts
are continuous, and soon the old life of Albania will have passed away.
Already the Vendetta seems to have disappeared; an armed man,
except the soldier, is not seen ; the country is safe ; the people given
[119]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
work. Often along roads that are coming into existence I have seen
long lines of women, children and old men, thousands of them, it
seemed to me, breaking stone from morning to night, for which they
receive three lire and their bread and cheese per day. Even the very
little ones are given the ration. Work is provided for those who can
work, and to the helpless the government issues flour, rice, cornmeal
and sugar. So by its work and by its charity the Italian Government
has given the people of Albania the bread which has kept them from
starvation.
In the districts where troops are in camp, medical officers are in
charge of the hospital service for the natives. A municipal doctor is
appointed for the sanitary care of the town of Valona, and a hospital
has been built of late with all modern and scientific arrangements.
Municipal doctors are charged with the visiting of the sick at their
houses, and necessary medicines are issued by the public dispensary to
the poor. Special buildings have been fitted up for lodging places for
homeless natives, and orphans who have been abandoned are confined
to the care of families on whose morality the authorities can rely. In
order to fight the most severe and the most characteristic of local sick-
ness malarial quinine is largely distributed to the natives. It is
even issued to the schoolmasters for the benefit of their students.
These seem to be perhaps somewhat trivial matters to relate, but
are necessary, I think, to show the excellent care given to small details
of the work done for the people by the Italians. A word in regard to
schools, of which it may be briefly stated that, during the Turkish
regimes, the school question was completely ignored. The few schools
which at that time existed were sectarian in character, Orthodox with
an Hellenophile tendency, or Turkish Mohammedan. The Prince of
Wied's government was unable to solve that or probably any other
problem, but upon the landing of Italian troops the question of schools
immediately came up, and common and sectarian schools started in
every village, where both languages, Italian and Albanian, are taught.
The Italian masters were chosen from amongst professional teachers
picked from the troops, preference being given to those of Italo-
Albanian origin, who are able to speak the native language. The
government considers the problem of native language to be intimately
connected with the broader one of the development of an Albanian
conscience. Teaching is at present limited to the standard classics,
special attention being given to an elementary practical course in agri-
culture. For this purpose every school is provided with an orchard
[120]
ITALY S GREAT WORK IN ALBANIA
or garden which all the school children help to cultivate. Each boy
has a bread ration daily, and, thanks to private contributions, clothes
and books have been distributed in many schools. The schools are 155
at present, with 278 teachers and about 10,000 school children. At
Arjirokastro, in behalf of the prefectura, a technical and commercial
school has just been started, and another will shortly be opened at
Valona.
As regards agriculture, it may be said that Italians have made an
excellent beginning in training the people by means of experimental
farms. The best of these is at Valona, where the farm is established
in a valley north of the town. It is an interesting institution and has
proved useful to the army as well as instructive to the people. There
are here under cultivation some four hundred acres, which produce
wheat, vegetables, such as onions, cabbages, lettuce, and other things.
Excellent houses have been erected and others are in progress. Some
thirty-five soldiers are quartered here to till the lands and instruct the
natives; of the latter about the same number are employed. These
are paid one lira per day, with a little food, principally corn meal, given
gratuitously. The natives prefer this to labor on the roads, though
for that work in the neighborhood of Valona the Italian Government
pays three and one-half lira per day.
For the instruction of the country people, as well as for practical
purposes, modern methods of cultivation are used, and approved farm
machinery employed ; for instance, an American plow and a gasoline-
driven engine, and other implements, were seen. The farm was this
spring only in its second season, but already it seems that an average
of 4,000 lire per month has been received from the sale of the produce,
chiefly of course to the markets of Valona for use of the soldiers.
Already the soldier-farmers are raising pigs, chickens, turkeys and
pigeons and are experimenting with hares. It is a great work,
intended primarily as an example to Albanian tenants and proprietors
who are following the instruction they receive. They are given seed
and farm machinery by the Italian Government, but are required in
return to sell their produce for the use of the troops. For the cultiva-
tion of these farms the government advances the money, but is repaid
from the sales. Prices are fixed at a moderate rate.
To Italy's course in Albania the world owes the uplift of a people
from wretchedness and misery into the sunlight of hope. I need
hardly predict in regard to our Ally's great part in the war that the
verdict of the future will be: "Well, done, Italy! You and your
soldiers hare won the gratitude and admiration of the world."
[121]
Dahmttia
BY
DOCTOR ROBERTO GHIGLIANOVITCH
Member of the Dalmatian Diet
I HE HONORABLE ROBERTO GHIGLIANO-
VITCH is the representative of the Italians of Dal-
matia. For the last thirty years he has been a
Member of the Dalmatian Diet ; he is a former Presi-
dent of the Political Association of the Italians of
Dalmatia and of the Board of Directors of the
National League for their Italian schools. During the
War he was a Member of the Board of Directors of the Political
Society of Unredeemed Italians in Rome. A man of his calibre would
naturally be a shining target for the Austrian police, who hounded
him ceaselessly and finally triumphed in an order for his arrest. This
he forestalled by his escape to Italy in March, 1915.
It is a constant source of grief to the Italian Dalmatians to recall
how near they had come to attaining their goal of unity with Italy
when Garibaldi, in 1866, had actually planned the expedition for their
liberation, in which he was supported by Premier Ricasoli. Garibaldi
conceived of this as a continuation of the general programme of Italian
unity and freedom. The unfortunate events that followed cut short
the cherished hopes of Garibaldi and his Dalmatian brothers. The
latter always assumed that, in any martial activities for liberation and
Italian unity, they were to take their share of dangers and hardships
equally with the Italians of the Kingdom. They proved this gloriously
in 1848, in 1859, and 1866. The following clear statement of Dr.
Ghiglianovitch is full of inevitable suggestion. The Editors.
[122]
Dahuatia
FTER MAKING MY ESCAPE to Italy in March,
1915, I had the joy of returning to my native country
with Admiral Millo, the hero of the Dardanelles,
whom the Italian Government had named Governor
of Dalmatia. I landed with him first at Sebenico and
then at Zara. The two cities, and the Dalmatian
Islands, had been occupied a few days before by the
Italian land and sea forces. When we landed, the Italians at Sebenico
received us with manifestations of joy. I found my native city, Zara,
in ecstasy after the signing of the Armistice in November, 191*8. Its
streets were all bedecked with thousands of Italian flags. When the
Italian battleship arrived, with the Commander who had occupied Zara
several hours before the signing of the Armistice, the entire population
of the city gathered along the shore. Young and old, women and
children, knelt devoutly, blessing Italy, their liberator !
When Admiral Millo spoke to the crowd from the balcony of the
Municipal Palace of Zara, public demonstration knew no bounds. The
entire population swore eternal allegiance to the Mother-Country,
Italy, and to her glorious and victorious King. The Italians of the
Dalmation Islands received the Italian forces of occupation with the
same joyful acclaim. Thanks to the provisions made by the Italian
Governor, after the first difficulties of feeding the population were
overcome, and after dealing with Bolsheviki soldiers and prisoners
whom Austria scattered through the interior of the country, life
assumed its normal aspect. Food is plentiful there, and land and sea
communications are being reestablished. Public administration and
schools have resumed their regular work. The conduct of the troops
of occupation is correct in every respect. Even the rural Slavs of
the interior are receptive and appreciative.
But the joy of all the liberated Italians is far from unalloyed.
The chief city of Dalmatia, Spalato the city which bears so long
and sad a history of struggles for the triumph of Italian sentiment
[123]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
in Dalmatia has not been occupied by the Italian Army and Navy.
It was not included in the line of the occupation of Dalmatia as
traced by the conditions of the Treaty of Armistice between Italy and
Austria-Hungary. At Spalato there is now a provisional Croatian
government, acting under directions from the National Committee
of Sagabria. With unheard-of violence, they suppress every demon-
stration on the part of the large and important Italian element of the
city. Italian and foreign newspapers have published for American
and Allied public opinion news of the outrages committed against the
Italians at Spalato. Their tragic fate can easily be foreseen if their
city should not be reunited to Italy as Zara, Sebenico, and the Dalma-
tian Islands will be.
As an evidence of the persistently Italian character of Spalato,
and of the ardent longing of the Italians at Spalato to have their city
joined to Italy, the following incident will be enlightening. Only two
days after the signing of the Armistice, about 5,000 Italians in Spalato
became members of the National Association of the " Dante Alighieri "
of Rome, which, since its foundation about thirty years ago, has been
ceaseless in its efforts to uphold the sacred Italian aspirations among
which, just like the Trentino, Venezia Giulia, Trieste, and Fiume, Dal-
matia has always largely figured.
Dalmatia has been as Italian as Rome and Venice for 2,000 years.
It was Roman up to the time of the fall of the Roman Empire ; then it
constituted itself into free communities, thoroughly Latin and Italian
in character. It belonged to the Republic of Venice from 1409 to
1797, in which year it was given by Napoleon to Austria, together
with Venice and Istria.
In spite of the barbarous methods employed by Austria from 1866
to the day of her disruption, in order to bring about forcibly a pre-
ponderance of Croatian population in Dalmatia, the Italian sentiment
there is very much alive. This fact should be recognized and given
serious consideration. Dalmatia has nothing of the Balkan and
Eastern character. One has only to see its cities and be genuinely
in touch with its populations in order to be convinced that Rome and
Venice did not influence them externally only, but left indelible marks
of Italian thought and culture upon them. Italy, therefore, has not
only a legal claim, but a spiritual hold over the country.
It is only because of her high regard for the aspirations of the
new State, which comes into being beyond the chain of the Dinaric
[124]
DALMATIA
Alps, that Italy is disposed to make the sacrifice to the new State of a
very considerable part of the Dalmatian territory. The southern
part includes the important outlets on the Adriatic of Metcovich,
Kleck, Neum, Gravosa, Ragusa, Bocche di Cattaro. With these out-
lets and those south of Fiume reaching the northern border of Dal-
matia (and that means Buccari, Porto Re, Novi, Cirquenizza, Segna,
Jablanaz, Carlopago), and with the addition of the harbors of Antivari
and Dulcigno, the new Jugo-Slav State would possess two sections
of the Adriatic coast, extending for about 2,000 kilometers (450
miles), a coast which would more than amply supply their needs for
any possible economic and commercial development.
[125]
Ammra ttt Arma
A 3fm UfttOfrUto,, by 3foh.n JL >lat*r, of tip HtttarrBitij of orlp0t?r, of
tip Hatter fart of tip Eloquent ($to to Ammra (EompoBfo by
for 3talu/B (E*l*bratum of Am?rira*B
Jlultruritornrr Dan. 1918
BY
GABRIELE D'ANNUNZIO
America, thy soul is marching on!
John Brown's old song, deep-rooted in thy soil,
Thy sacred earth that never can forget,
Springs forth again like some strange crimson flower.
Out of the deep years still the tolling bells
That sounded for his passing in the west
Echo again the call to martyrdom.
The seed is come to harvest: marching on,
Thy eager youths leap forth from thy brown furrows,
Leaving thy white streets for the long, long trail.
Stars in their hands they bear, and drive before them
Out of thy States all base designs for peace.
March on ! In our fair fields the blood is flowing
That stained the valley of the Shenandoah.
Here is the clash of steel, the fire, the anguish ;
Here is the sweat, the rage, the bitter grief ;
Hunger and thirst are here; the dead, the dying;
The unclean herd that welters on the field.
[126]
TO AMERICA IN ARMS
March on ! As long ago, so now in battle
Here in our forests, on our mountain-tops,
By our Italian lakes and rivers striving,
By land or sea, man finds his life at last
Where day by day he meets death face to face.
No longer is there sleep nor time for waiting,
No truce, no rest ; the reveille is past.
March on, to fight the battle of the world!
Down in the sweet old valley of Virginia
The birds are singing softly in the grove;
And Stonewall Jackson wakes again at midnight,
Scenting the Southern blood that blows afar,
With shattered arm upraised, shouts, " Forward, march!
There in the darkness where his loved ones laid him
He cries, with that old voice they knew so well,
" Send my men forward they will not retreat."
Phil Sheridan is once more in the saddle;
He scents disaster twenty miles away,
And gallops through the dim years of the dead.
That great bay horse has neither bit nor bridle ;
His heart is swifter than his flying feet ;
And when he comes, the end is victory !
*' Ships! Ships! Ships! " cries Farragut the admiral,
Who sank the rams, and burned the rafts, and tore the chains away.
Sailor stout of heart, with the love of right and liberty,
Where is now the barrier that must be broken through ?
W r here is now the harbor to be wrested from the enemy ?
What is now the armor that the guns must batter down?
Farragut is pale in death, but into his own sepulchre
Premuda's hero * comes to share his glories and his dreams.
* Captain Rizzo. Premuda is an island in the Adriatic, the scene of Austro- Italian
naval battles.
[127]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
" Wings! Wings! Wings! " is the cry in all the air to-day:
Not the cry of victors who have fallen in the fight,
Not the cry of air cadets, nor crowds beneath the hurricane,
But the cry of Victory herself who calls for wings !
Give her wings, and see her take the skies and make her home with us,
Fly by tens of thousands o'er the Piave and the Marne !
Hover o'er our sacred streams, and high above our mountain-tops
Rise forever into life above the realms of death !
" Free ! Free ! Free ! " Hear the motors sing for Liberty,
Never-ceasing thunder as her passing rends the sky.
Hear the engines booming out the hymn of human Liberty,
While the clouds conceal the earth and smoke pollutes the air.
How the breath grows short and the stoutest heart is nigh appalled,
How the martyr's death is hidden in the gulfs of space !
But the Winged Victory grows taller and more beautiful,
Strong and ever stronger is her voice above the storm !
Live, then, America, for truth is living;
Die, for in death is immortality.
Form once again with us the line of battle.
The war begins: for this, the world's great hour
Of strife and harvest, arms and scythes are ready
To fight and reap, in Death's great harvest day.
No longer will we share our bread with brutes.
At last we're on the march, to plod no longer
Like driven cattle 'neath the tyrant's goad.
The people in arms are marching to the future,
And dedicate their stars to years unseen.
We're on the march! How long shall we be marching?
Until the roads of east and west are free ;
Until beneath the four winds of the world
Freedom is possible for all mankind ;
Until we reach the end of our long journey ;
Until time brings the fullness of the years.
A Faith in arms is marching to the future ;
Its flags are consecrated to the dawn ! f
* Reproduced in THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY through the courtesy of The
Outlook.
[128]
'H &qtutfir0tt owr Hwtna
BY
LIEUTENANT STEFANO D'AMICO
Member of the Italian Military Mission
for Aeronautics to the United States
FTER three years of Austrian and German aeroplane
incursions over the most splendid cities of Italy, after
hundreds of women, old men, and babies had been
wickedly slaughtered by murderous bombs, after the
destruction of priceless treasures of choicest art, eight
Italian machines, with prodigal skill and boldness,
arrived above the Capitol of the Monarchy of the
Hapsburgs, and with undisturbed dominion kept the vast metropolis
under the menace of the Italian "Vendetta."
It was 9:20 on the morning of August the 9th. The principal
streets of Vienna were crowded by a throng, whose stupor was as
great as their incredulity. That courageous tricolour, passing and
repassing above the Hof, over the royal palace of Carl I and Carl IV,
above the towers of St. Stephen, above the Ring, was it indeed the
flag of Italy ? But the dismay of those who stared up at the invaders
was only for a second; for not crashing bombs, but showers of tri-
colored pamphlets, sparkling through the air like rainbow-fragments
of a silver mine exploded in the sun already high, descended from the
sky and fell in the streets, in the squares, and on the houses, passing
the word of civilization. Perhaps some were even able to insinuate
themselves inside the inaccessible Castle of Schoembrum.
The squadron was commanded by the famous aviator and poet,
Gabriele d'Annunzio, the personification of Italy's national aspira-
tion, he who with a magnificent word, with constant example and
intrepid boldness, was the radiant light for every Italian soldier. And
now, with the triumph of his firm desire, with his much-dreamed-of
flight over Vienna become a glorious military achievement, the incen-
tive to others still more magnificent, our memory may turn back to
[129]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
the anxieties and discussions which had to be faced for three years in
order to convince the commanders of the possibility and effectiveness
of such an action. Once before everything had been ready for the
flight. During September, 1917, a squadron of Capronis had been
completely prepared, with machines and men awaiting the approach of
the fixed hour, when, a few hours before the appointed time of depar-
ture, Headquarters, for reasons unknown, forbade the flight.
D'Annunzio and his pilots with profound regret had to resign
themselves and renew the daily struggle of persuasion, which they
continued until their dream was realized. Their flight was expected
from day to day. Amongst the aviators at the front it had become
the main topic of conversation.
In a field in the Venetian plains the perilous trip was prepared
for with joy, but the changeable weather, sometimes clear and at other
times stormy, hindered the departure. Finally, on the 9th of August,
the trip was to be undertaken. On the night preceding that fateful
dawn d'Annunzio spoke magnificent words of confidence to his com-
panions, to which they answered by swearing to accompany him any-
where. Then came the hour of departure, 5:50 A. M. One by one,
at half-minute intervals, the machines arose and assumed a "closed
formation." The squadron selected for the raid was called "Serenis-
sima," the name of the famous Venetian Republic, since it was manned
entirely by young Venetians, sworn to consecrate their lives to the
defense of Venice.
The type of aeroplane employed was entirely of Italian conception
and manufacture, bearing the name of "S. V. A." It is the most
perfect machine in the aviation camp, equipped with a "260 H. P.-S. P.
A." motor, having a velocity of 145 miles per hour. It climbs very
rapidly and is used largely on the Italian front, either as a pursuit
machine, or for swift long-distance reconnaissance, being strongly
armed with two machine guns. It is the terror of the Austrian
aviators.
The machines, in their "closed formation," were headed by
d'Annunzio. The squadron steered for Venice, passed that city, and
soared on over the Italian lines on the Piave. For a while the more
advanced lookouts were able to watch the machines, crossing the
enemy's positions like swift eagles. Then speedily they disappeared
in, the air, leaving behind them at the aviation field a suspense and
expectation which seemed infinite, filling a space of time which seemed
eternal.
[130]
D'ANNUNZIO'S SQUADRON OVER VIENNA
The route, going, was to be over Caorle, Palmanova, Klangenfurt,
Kapjenburg, Neustad, to Vienna, about 315 miles, while on the return
the machines were to deviate so as to pass over Gratz, Lubiana, and
Trieste. All told, 630 miles must be measured by the flight, 500 of
which were above enemy territory.
Its boldness of conception and extraordinary aim gave an epic
character to the undertaking, and the anxiety of those waiting was
tortured by the imagining of far-off difficulties, nameless snares, and
unforeseen resistances. The atmospheric conditions, good at the
departure, became after a short time distinctly unfavorable. Dense,
black clouds sailed through the horizon, and squalls of wind shook the
machines, which nevertheless proceeded undaunted toward their goal.
At Klagenfurt the enemy's flying field was seen to have been
thrown into astonished confusion. Two machines attempted to climb
up and give pursuit ; but the Italian aviators passed over and out of
sight with great velocity, steering directly for Vienna, which they
were rapidly approaching.
It was 9:20 A. M. when the eight superb machines appeared over
Vienna. Descending to an altitude of two thousand feet, always in a
"closed formation," they arrived above the heart of the city.
Each machine carried a load of pamphlets, written both in Italian
and German, testifying to the terrible and marvellous power of
America, announcing the certain victory of the Allies, and urging the
people of Austria to break the German yoke that enthralled them.
Above the center of the city the Italian aviators dropped their cargoes
of pamphlets, which scattered in the air and descended slowly toward
the ground, falling amidst the dense crowds, and in some cases even
inside the walls which surround the Imperial Gardens of Hof fburg.
After twenty minutes of soaring above the great town, during
which Vienna was spanned several times, the leader gave the signal to
return. Not an Italian shot had been fired, not a machine had arisen
from the city to attempt an attack in defense.
The return, like the advance, was accomplished as had been
planned. Over Lubiana a few disorderly cannon-shots were fired.
Above Trieste a hydroplane, circling over the city, seemed uncertain
whether or not to attack the closed group of Italian aeroplanes which
were passing swiftly, but with great prudence renounced the fight.
Beyond Triese the Adriatic was crossed, the airmen steering for
Venice. Above Venice d'Annunzio threw down a message of saluta-
tion to the City "Serenissima," from which his squadron had taken its
[131]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
name. And then the flying field appeared, afar off, in the waste
green plains. It was then precisely 12:25 A. M.
The field was crowded by joyous companions who through inter-
minable hours had awaited the return with inexpressible anxiety.
The trip had lasted six hours and thirty-five minutes. Not counting
the stop above Vienna, nor the time it took to climb to their altitude,
the aviators had done the 630 miles in less than six hours, notwith-
standing unpropitious atmospheric conditions.
The task, so long a dream, had awakened into accomplishment,
which already thrilled with burning desires to lead into greater things.
This was the realized vision of Gabriele d'Annunzio! In Ger-
many and Austria a great legend of hatred was created about the Poet.
They recognized in him the most powerful enemy they had amongst
the Italians. The enemy Imperial Government set a large sum upon
his head, but the only effect was to bring him flying over every part
of their dominions. There was not a bold undertaking on land or sea
where his tracks failed to cleave the shining air.
"D'Annunzio in flights to Cattaro, Pola, and Trieste! D'An-
nunzio in all the battles! D'Annunzio above Vienna! On the
breeze of victory, which uplifts itself from the rivers of liberty, we
have come only out of joy of boldness ! we have come only to show
you what we shall be able to do when it is our desire, at the time that
we select !
"The rumble of the young Italian wing is not like the death-bell.
But our audacity suspends a sentence, between St. Stephen and the
Graban, that is not revocable, O people of Vienna! "
These were the last words of the message which the Poet dropped
upon Vienna.
|132]
TIIK PILOTS OK TIIK SQfADKOX " SKKKXISS1MA." WITH TIIKIK CAPTAIN,
n'ANNTN/lO, IN TIIK CKNTUK
Till sol AIi:ii.N " SKUKNISSIMA ' PASSIM! <>Yi:i; MTAP.I.K III' I I.I >l M !S uK Vli:\N\
[133]
[134]
[135]
[136]
ItHtt witty ttyr Option nf Jttalg
BY
MARY HATCH WILLARD
Founder of the National Surgical Dressings Committee, the French
Comfort Packets Committee, and America's Allies
Co-operative Committee
WORD of explanation is sufficient in presenting Mrs.
Mary Hatch Willard's very interesting account of
her visit with the Queen of Italy and the Queen's
household in the autumn of 1918. Mrs. Willard
had long been the head of an American organization
engaged in collecting funds for Italian relief work,
and had sent into Italy both funds and hospital sup-
plies in large amounts, the distribution in Italy being done through
an organization directed by the Contessa di Robilant, wife of General
de Robilant, who has since been serving as a member of the Italian
Peace Council. Thus Mrs. Willard was received by the Queen as
the representative of American women who had been laboring unre-
mittingly for the relief of Italy throughout the war. The Editors.
At Bologna they brought me the telegram. Was it possible that
the Queen was going to receive me at her summer palace, or was I
dreaming? Twice I read the message. There was no mistaking
the meaning. I was to see the Queen of Italy. I knew that General di
Robilant had asked her Majesty for an audience, but as I had been
told that she received very few people I was prepared to be dis-
appointed, and had quite forgotten that I had even the remotest
chance of such an honor. Then the telegram was shown me.
Preparations were immediately begun for my departure, the
time tables were consulted, and a telegram was sent to the Court,
announcing that I would arrive at Pisa the following morning at nine
o'clock. I was thrilled over the graciousness of her Majesty in allow-
ing me an audience at her country home, which was but a short
[137]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
distance by automobile from Pisa. Not even the prospect of a dismal
night ahead dampened my enthusiasm and the glorious anticipation
of a wonderful experience.
My friends of the Ufficio Doni saw me off. After a visit to
their offices, the Bureau of Distribution, and warehouses, and after
a dinner at the hotel, with all arrangements made for my extra lug-
gage, which was to be taken by an officer on to Modane to await me
there, I boarded the train with a handbag and my " Corona " (which
even a visit to the Queen could not make me part with), at 7.30 A. M.,
with several dreary hours before me.
The train was crowded, every seat occupied, with many standing
in the corridors. It is wonderful, the patience of the Italians over
the traveling accommodations few trains, long waits, and slow
progress. ' The war and lack of coal," they will tell you, without a
murmur, if you criticise the service.
At midnight I arrived at Florence, where I was to remain until
six o'clock. Florence ! how well I remembered it, and how I wished it
were daylight that I might once again revel in its enchanting beauty.
I. might as well have been in Hoboken or Jersey City as in this, one
of the most beautiful cities in the world. It was inky black, as I
followed the porter along the dimly-lighted station, into the street,
and crossed the road to the hotel. The proprietor, a portly looking
man, seemed surprised to see an American arriving at that hour of
the night. " Oh! " I thought. " If I told you I was on my way to
the Queen, how would your look of surprise turn into wonder and
respect! "
I had picked up a few words of Italian, and in my effort to make
him understand what I wanted, in the presence of a splendid-looking
officer, who was awaiting his turn for an interview, I mixed up my
French, my few words of Italian, and my English in an appalling
way. I wondered later how he had managed to understand that I
wanted accommodations for a few hours, until the departure of my
train at six o'clock. I got a room and managed to rest for a few
hours, until awakened by a loud rap at my door and a voice announc-
ing that it was five o'clock. Tired and sleepy ? Yes ; but I was on my
way to the Queen, and the time was approaching for my audience.
Again the walk in the darkness, and another crowded train. I
watched the sunrise, and reveled in the fields and hills which it then
shone upon. Daybreak was propitious for a pleasant day the
kind I had had since my arrival, with the exception of one day. I
[138]
MY VISIT WITH THE QUEEN OF ITALY
am convinced that the season for Italy is September, when the air is
soft and balmy, even in the mountains, and the showers, now and
then, only lay the dust and do not prevent one's enjoying the country.
I wanted the sunshine, and one of those glorious days, which I had
had till now ; so I eagerly scanned the horizon, as the sun rose higher
and higher. A shower ! what a pity ! but the clouds soon broke away
and the sun was out again, precisely to my wish. It seemed " good
luck."
The usual rush to get off the train and to find a porter followed
our arrival at Pisa. All the time I was wondering if the Queen had
received my telegram, and if there would be any one to meet me.
Across the tracks, down a long platform, I hurried after my porter,
going as directed to the office of the military commander. Just as
I was about to enter there I noticed a very commanding, fine-looking
gentleman, different from anyone else I had seen at the station.
Simultaneously we approached each other. In his hand was a tele-
gram, and pointing out my name, he asked me in French if I were
Madame Willard. " I have come to meet you," he said. ' The
Queen's auto is just outside." ' Have you any baggage? " he con-
tinued. " No," I replied, " only these," pointing to my bag and type-
writer, which the porter still held. ' I am on a very hurried trip
to Italy. The rest of my baggage is being taken on to Modane by an
officer who will meet me there." I offered this in explanation of
my meagre outfit. "Do you speak English?" I inquired. " Mal-
hereusement, non," he replied, and I blessed every moment in which I
had studied French, so as to be able to converse with this Count, the
Messenger of the Queen.
I stepped into the big touring car, feeling like Alice in Wonder-
land not that this car was different from many others in which I
had ridden, but it was the Queen's, and it had been sent to meet me.
' We will go to the hotel, if you wish; Her Majesty will receive you
at any hour this morning which will be agreeable to you, and you
must be weary after your trip." How I blessed the thoughtfulness
of Her Majesty, for I was feeling not at all fit to stand in the presence
of royalty after that hideous night.
Curious, this desire one has to be as smart-looking as possible
when expecting an audience with royalty. I remembered this morn-
ing that I had felt the same sensation when I was presented at the
Court of Saint James to make my courtesy to King Edward. The
preparations then were more carefully considered even than for my
[139]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
wedding, and, from head to foot, the slippers, the veil, the feathers -
no detail was overlooked in order to be perfectly gowned, and to have
everything en regie for the occasion. And yet I was perfectly
aware that five hundred women were to be presented at the same
time, with head-gear precisely the same, put on exactly alike, and
that there was not one chance in a thousand that the King would
notice the style of my gown, or the texture of the material, or the
fit which I had so carefully considered. The Queen and the
Princesses and the other Ladies of the Court, who are always present
at the King's audiences, might indeed have a care, for I saw them
that memorable evening smile over some of the dresses worn.
I remembered, too, that when the Queen of Belgium had the
graciousness to receive me at her little palace by the sea, at La Panne,
I thought I ought to give every .possible attention to my outfit ; yet,
after I had spent a good deal of time in dressing, and in having every
hair in its proper place, she received me in a simple outing gown and
a blue Tam-o'-Shanter hat, the color of her eyes.
So I was glad to have a little time to wash and brush up for my
audience. " I can be ready in an hour, if that will be a convenient
time for you," I said to the Queen's Gentleman of the Court. ' I
will return at that time for you," he replied, and drove away, leaving
me already more in love with Her Majesty than ever on account of
her thoughtfulness in biding my time. Womanlike, she knew how I
would feel, and she was even then trying to make it pleasant for me.
The Count returned, and we were soon on our way to the
Queen's palace. I did not have the remotest idea how far we should
motor before arriving, but we had gone only a short distance from
the city, by the leaning Tower of Pisa, the wonderful old Church and
Sacristy, with the lovely view of the hills in the distance, when we
approached the iron gates of the park of the palace. They were
opened by the guards, and then other gates, looking down a long vista
of road bordered by beautiful trees. I saw a large square yellow
building in the distance, and wondered if this were the lodge of the
palace, because I had pictured the country home of the King and
Queen as one of noble proportions, elaborate in design, with terraces
leading to a sunken garden, superb statuary, flowering shrubs, etc.
So I wondered if we should not drive on to the palace of my imagina-
tion; but we began to slow down and drove under the portc cochere
of the large square building I had first seen from the gates.
The Count asked me within, and I was ushered into a reception
[140]
MY VISIT WITH THE QUEEN OF ITALY
room, simply but comfortably furnished with some rare antiques. In
the centre of a large round table, containing magazines from all over
the world, our own Harper's and Scribner's lay among the others.
They were arranged, as in a club-room, around a vase of lovely
flowers. There were flowers also on the mantel. As I waited, I was
expecting that a Lady-in-Waiting would enter at any moment, who
would escort me to the Queen, and that I should then make my
courtesy, and, after a few moments' conversation, retire and be
motored back to my hotel, where I should spend the rest of the dav
by myself. I summoned to my mind all the court manners I knew,
and kept saying to myself,. " Don't forget you are to courtesy, to wait
until the Queen asks you to be seated. You must be sure that she
precedes you," etc., etc.
I was anxiously awaiting the Lady-in-Waiting when, suddenly,
the door was opened and a tall, beautiful woman with wonderful
brown eyes, dressed in black, with a row of pearls at her throat and
a bunch of flowers at the waist of her well-fitting, modish black gown,
approached me. Graciously she held out her hand in welcome, led
me into an adjoining room, which was very large, but also simple,
and bade me be seated.
' Your Majesty," I said, speaking French, " I recognize the great
honor you have conferred upon me by receiving me to-day, and I
thank you for granting me this audience." She replied that she was
greatly pleased to receive me, and then we talked of many things. I
asked about the children, the Prince and the little Princesses, and she
told me how naturally and simply they had been taught to think of
others. The Princess Yolande, she said, who personally attends the
sick, takes a part of the sugar, which is her daily allowance, puts it
away until she has a little bundle of it, and then carries it to some
sick person whom she is looking after.
A mother's love and pride in her children were never more
beautifully expressed than by this beautiful woman, who is an ador-
able mother, wrapped up in her family.
" I want them to be real men and women first," she said, " and
not only Princes and Princesses. I want them to grow up, always
thoughtful of others, and to appreciate the noble, fine things in life,
and not to think of their titles and positions as important above all
else. They lead the life of normal children, and are taught to do
everything practical. I do not care," this beautiful woman con-
tinued, " for all the formalities which belong to my position ; I like
[141]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
simplicity; I go without a maid; I attend to my own dressing." Then,
laughing and then putting her hands behind her back : " I do have
to have some one help me with this. Usually, I wear just simple
country dresses out here in the country, except when I expect a guest ;
then I wear this."
I was charmed, and felt perfectly at ease with this great
Queen all the greater, it seemed to me, for her cordial, simple
manners. I asked if I might see the children. I told her how we
loved the little Prince in our Country, and what pleasure it would
give me to meet them. " Come with me," she said. " They are at
the beach; we will meet them coming home."
Her Majesty called for her hat, and a car was driven to the door.
She took the wheel, I getting in beside her, and we drove down a long
straight road in the park which, she explained, led to the sea. " Our
summer home is really by the sea. I will show it to you, but we are
not occupying it this summer."
Presently there came towards us a group of children the
Princess Yolande and the Prince on biccycle, with the younger ones
in a pony cart with their governess. The young Prince, a splendid
boy with the most bewitching smile, waved to his mother. " Ah,"
she said, " he is such a darling boy, he is my companion and friend,
as well as my son, and is such a comfort to me. He is only fourteen,
but so big for his age. You will see."
She called to the children to stop, and we came to a halt. I got
out of the car and she presented the little Prince and the Princesses
to me. The Prince kissed my hand, and the others greeted me
charmingly, as if I had a right to be there. " We will find the baby,"
her Majesty explained, " with his nurse, down by the sea a most
adorable child, with such a wonderful look in his eyes. You will see."
We passed a Swiss cottage, surrounded by trees, simple and
unpretentious. ' This is the home I told you about ; I love it ; and
the sea is just beyond. That house across the way," pointing to a
large square building, " was occupied by our staff; but we do not need
it now, for most of them have gone to war. We must set an example,
and not keep more employes than we cannot absolutely do without;
so we have very few with us now. Look," she said, " there is the
sea ! " I was amazed to see how near it was. ' The wind is heavy
to-day and it is quite rough. We have left everything just as it
was the sand dunes, with nothing artificial."
[142]
MY VISIT WITH THE QUEEN OF ITALY
Her Majesty then pointed to a group of little thatched-ropf
houses, a tiny village built in the sand dunes. ' Here," she said,
" the children are taught housekeeping, cooking, gardening, the care
of animals. It is their own little town. I believe in having them
taught the practical things of life." We stepped into one of the
little houses. " This is the kitchen where they learn to cook, and
they often get their own meals here." Then, passing on into another
room, " This is the dining room." The table was set, as if the
children had just finished playing there. ' Here they learn how to
clean and keep the silver in order, and how to manage everything in
connection with this part of a home."
" Oh, there is the baby," the Queen cried ; and going over to him r
a boy of three, she presented the little Prince to me, and he took my
hand, and we became friends at once such a pretty baby, with
great brown eyes, with the look which his mother described. She
took him up in her arms, and then he put his hand in mine as \V
walked about the little village and inspected the cow-stall, the pigeon-
house, and the flower and vegetable garden of this miniature village.
I said to the baby, "What are you doing?" He replied in
English, " Making soup for Sunday." There was a bowl of spinach
on the bench beside the nurse. Then her Majesty explained that on
Sundays the older children cook dinner, and serve it, and often
have their little friends dine with them not as the Princes and
Princesses of the Royal House, but just as intimate little friends.
" I often come to the beach for my dejeuner," she continued, " as I
can get through so much more quickly, and I have so much to do."
" You are busy all of the time? " I asked. " Oh, yes," she said,
" every minute. There is always so much to be accomplished, even
here in the country; there is not time for all." During our conver-
sation she talked of the King. " His tastes are so simple ; when he
is at home he sleeps on an army cot, and he travels as a simple soldier.
He wraps his brush and other toilet articles in a small package and
does them up with newspaper. His officers all have their traveling
cases, but not his Majesty. He has only been at home four days
since the War. He adores his wife and children. This I heard
from the Master of Ceremonies at Padua.
We returned to the house, and I thought I had had enough
honors for one day, when, in the most cordial way, the Queen said,
' We should like to have you breakfast with us, if you do not mind
a simple meal." I was so overcome that I hardly knew how to reply.
[143]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
Lunch with her Majesty, in her country home, en famille, that was
too much; but of course I accepted, and we passed into the house
together.
The family was waiting for us, and was lined up in front of the
dining-room door, which opened into the room where we had had our
interview. Introductions were in order. The Queen entered the
room first, I followed, and then the rest of the Royal Household.
The room was large and the table was set for fifteen people. The
decorations were simple, the crown, on some of the china and glasses,
alone designating the rank of the owner. The room was nicely but
plainly furnished almost what you might expect in any home of
culture. Liveried waiters were the only evidence of style.
I was at the right of the charming little Prince, and on the other
side of me sat the Princess Yonne. Next to her, at the head of the
long end of the table, was the manager of the studies of the Prince.
He selects the studies, decides upon the masters, the linguists, etc.,
and the course of education. The Prince, a great student, loves to
study and read. His favorite study, he told me, was art. He loved
it the best. He is so brilliant, with a memory, they explained, like
his Majesty's, that they can have only the most advanced instructors.
He is only fourteen, but is very tall for his age. Slightly built, yet
strong and well set, he has the most ravishing smile. He was dressed
in a white sweater suit, very like a baseball shirt with sleeves.
The Princess and the two other little Princesses were simply
dressed for the country, their hair tied up in little pig-tails. Next
to the Prince's Master was the English head of instruction of the
three Princesses. She occupies the same relative position to them as
does to the Queen the Master of Ceremonies, who met me at the
station. He is a charming man.
At the Queen's right was the Prince of Servia, a young man of
whom the Queen is very fond, as they are bound by royal ties. Then
came the dear Little Princess, who has quite a keen sense of humor.
Next sat the teacher of languages, and, beside the Prince on his left,
the Princess.
The conversation was very general. The children all spoke
English, but the Queen, the Count, and the Prince spoke French. I
said I had picked up a few words of Italian, and the Prince asked
" what words ? " I told them, and they roared with laughter, so we
were all quite at home with each other. The Princess is a great
sport, rides horseback, and loves all out-door exercises. The Prince
[144]
MY VISIT WITH THE QUEEN OF ITALY
loves animals, and one day his mother was surprised to feel some-
thing punching her elbow. She turned to see what it was, and found
the boy's donkey in her room !
After luncheon I thanked the Queen, and shook hands with
everyone, the little Prince kissing my hand. The Queen's motor was
at the door, and I passed out, feeling that I had gone from one of the
happiest homes I had ever had the privilege of visiting. The honor
of the whole occasion impressed me as nothing else had ever done,
because it was all done so naturally, and I was made to feel so much
at home that I forgot who was entertaining me, and seemed to fit as
naturally into the home-life as if I were an old friend of the family.
Such is the charm of this beautiful Italian Queen. I loved Italy,
the beautiful country, and her splendid people; but I shall love all
still more now, because of the beautiful Queen with whom I spent
one of the happiest days of my life.
I returned to the hotel, half dreaming. I stepped out on to the
balustrade, in front of my room, and looked out upon a dream city.
The Arno, spanned by beautiful old bridges at my feet, went winding
in graceful curving lines through the city; the old picturesque tower,
on the other side of the river, rang out the hour of two o'clock; and
on the opposite bank was the poem of a Venetian facade, with its
graceful pillars and carved stone arches. Above, the sun was shin-
ing brilliantly, the sky was a perfect blue, and the fantastic clouds,
seen on the horizon, added to the beauty of this Italian scene. The
Prince's words came to me, " I love Art." " Ah," I thought, " the
boy has it here in his own Italy, as in no other country ; and this dear
boy of fourteen will some day be a great Prince, and a great King."
And so my visit to the Queen was over. The reality had sur-
passed my wildest imaginations, and I was still wondering why I
should have had this good fortune, under circumstances which would
not happen again in a lifetime, when there was a rap at my door, and
the concierge said, with a good deal of excitement, " Madame Wil-
lard, a telephone from the Court; and they want to know if you will
receive the Count at five o'clock, who will have some photographs and
papers for you." With all the calm I could command, as if I were
in the habit of receiving telephone messages from the Court, I replied,
" Say that Mrs. Willard will be very pleased to receive the Count at
five o'clock."
The Queen had promised me some pictures of the children, so I
knew that she was sending them by the Count. There was a beauti-
[145]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
ful large portrait of herself, and one of each of the children, all signed
by themselves, except those of the little girl, signed by the Queen. It
was another most gracious act, and I shall prize these pictures among
my treasures. It is the end of a perfect day;* the sun has set, and
my thoughts are still with that dear Royal Family and their beautiful
mother. I leave Pisa to-morrow, but I take with me something so
wonderfully lovely that this will always be a blessed city to me.
* Mrs. Willard wrote out this account of her visit that same afternoon, after returning to
her hotel The Editors.
[146]
Utahj'a Ifar-flattw
BY
CAPTAIN GIUSEPPE BE VIONE
Member of the Italian Parliament ; Chief of the
Italian Military Mission for Aeronautics
IVERYBODY knows that the war industries of all the
Allied Nations, and particularly the industries of
aviation, draw from America the essential part of
the raw materials they use.
The magnificent victories of the Allied Armies
during these last days, which have added so much
glory to the American name, make us wonder at the
splendid results that might have been obtained, had we been able to
realize that which we most needed supremacy of the air so as to
pursue the retreating foe with our squadrons of airplanes, spreading
terror and disorder among his lines and destroying and closing railway
junctions, roads, bridges, and trestles.
The foe's power of resistance would thus have been struck at its
vitals, in its center of supplies, at the great factories of arms and
ammunition, at the bridges, railways, and roads by means of which the
armies at the front were kept in fighting trim.
But in order to attain to an unlimited output of its powers of pro-
duction, Italy would have had to obtain from this country an adequate
and continually increasing quantity of raw materials, metals, wood,
dopes, and textile matter. It was absolutely necessary that we should
obtain such assistance from the American Government, of course, in
perfect harmony with the needs of all our allies, and for this pur-
pose I was sent to Washington and appointed Chief of the Italian
Military Mission for Aeronautics.
It may be of interest to show how efficiently the raw materials
which were provided us were being utilized. Our progress was
remarkable, and every Italian may justly be proud of it. Italy passed
beyond the critical period of experimental research and of uncertain-
ties, always to be overcome at the beginning of new enterprises. Italy
[147]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
was supplying her own needs in motors and planes entirely, besides
using her own original types of machines. Within a few months all
the machines flying at the Italian front would have been of Italian
manufacture and design, and equipped with Italian motors.
It is generally known that military aviation needs four types of
machines: fighting, scouting, day bombing and night bombing
machines. As to fighting aeroplanes, Italy turned out two splendid
types, the A-l (so-called "Balilla"), a machine developed from the
S. V. A. of the Ansaldo factory; and the "Pe-Gamma," from the orig-
inal plans of the Pomilio Works (recently taken over by the Ansaldo
factory).
As to the other types of flying machines for warfare, Italy was
well provided with models of her own, produced in large numbers. We
have, in fact, two types of scouting machines of high value : The SIA
8-B (developed from the former 7-B type), made by the SIA factory,
which is a branch of the FIAT, and the P. P. of the Pomilio factory
which, as previously stated, has been incorporated into the Ansaldo
works.
Two important raids were performed last year by the SIA 7-B
aeroplane ; that is, the flight from Turin to Naples and return ( 1 ,004
miles) without landing, and from Turin to London (700 miles), with
the crossing of the Alps.
For day bombing, where speed and great power are essential, two
Italian machines were ready, which had already undegone the most
severe tests. One is the SVA, built by the Ansaldo factory, which can
also be used for fighting and scouting, and had accomplished the bomb-
ing of Inasbruck, besides performing the raid on Friedriechshafen.
The second machine is the SIA 9-B, equipped with a Fiat engine of
700 HP, which, owing to its speed and great power, can be flown over
long distances and be used in broad daylight bombing.
For night bombing there were the biplane and triplane Caproni,
now of international fame. The larger model of Caproni biplane
(CA-5), equipped in Italy with three Fiat motors of 300 HP each, is
without doubt superior to all similar types in existence, so much so that
all of our Allies, American, British, and French, largely adopted it;
and at the French front several Italian squadrons of Caproni were in
active service, adding new records to their well-established reputation.
It is also known to-day that at Mineola, L. I., the first Caproni built in
the United States and equipped with American Liberty Motors, had
gone through its tests with the greatest success, and that the Federal
[148]
ITALY S WAR-PLANES
authorities had placed with American firms large orders for Caproni-
Liberty Aeroplanes.
I firmly believe that Italy can be proud of its aviation achieve-
ments and victories. On the 15th of last June, the first day of the
ill-fated Austrian drive on the Piave, 34 Austrian airplanes were
downed, while only two of our machines were reported missing.
But no aeroplane, as perfect as may be its design and construction,
could be of any service unless equipped with the best and most reliable
motor, and unless the capacity for production of the factories con-
nected with the manufacture of aircraft could cope with the demands
necessary to keep up the full efficiency of the aerial force. And here
again Italy's efforts met with success.
The FIAT factory stands first, as one of our largest manufac-
turers of aviation motors, with her two well-known engines, the A- 12
and the A-14. The A-12 develops 300 HP, and the A-14 700 HP, this
being the most powerful motor used at the front for aviation by any
of the Allies. The FIAT had a remarkably large output of these
engines, and I regret that for obvious reasons I cannot give the exact
figures concerning it. But I can say that our Aeronautical Depart-
ment, which bought all this production, after having met all of our own
requirements, was in position to supply the Allies with an important
number of these motors daily, in compliance with their urgent
demands. Besides this, the FIAT had ready a new model, which was
soon to be produced in large series: The A-15, of 450 HP, greatly
reduced in size from previous models, light, accessible, and possessing
new and important characteristics, which would undoubtedly cause a
further and greater development of our military aviation.
In addition to the FIAT, we have the SPA, of the well-known
automobile factory by that name, which with some important changes
and only a slight increase in weight has been able to develop her old
220 HP motor into a new 300 HP motor, without being obliged to
change her former equipment and machinery thus mastering a great
technical and industrial difficulty, and producing a new engine of slight
specific weight and great power. These motors were being turned out
in large series, and were of the greatest value to aviation, being
especially fitted to fighting aeroplanes.
Another important factory, the Isotta-Fraschini, produces high-
grade machines which have won reputation for their reliability and
perfect workmanship. Here again a new motor was ready, the I. F.
[149]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
V-6, developing 300 HP, greatly appreciated both by aeroplane manu-
facturers and pilots.
I can not mention all the minor though excellent factories, among
which excel, with many others, the Nagliati, the Colombo, etc.; nor
the greater works which have taken up the manufacture of some of
motors described above, such as Bianchi, Tosi, Breda, etc.
The following figures may give a more correct idea of Italy's
effort in the production of aviation motors : 1,500 motors a month was
the output, and before the end of the year 1918 we could certainly have
produced over 2,000 motors monthly, which means the astonishing
figure of 24,000 aviation engines per year, all of them of Italian
design, of Italian construction, and all of high repute, established after
the severest tests. And this, when Italy at the beginning of the war,
possessed not more than 100 aeroplanes, and less than 100 pilots!
Italy was ready and proud to put at the complete disposal of the
American Government all that she had accomplished in the aviation
field ; all of her experience, all of her knowledge and highest results,
won through long and hard sacrifices. This was the least that we
could do to prove our deep and everlasting gratitude to this generous
and glorious Country for the benefits she has bestowed upon us.
[150]
of
altr (Srrat Jialtatt (iwujnsrr. fflmtntimi the iiim Iluuaaiun of If rattrr in
War ffrtromt Jtalg and (Srrmamj
IUSEPPE VERDI, from his picturesque hermitage of
St. Agata, followed political developments attentively.
His letters to Contessa Clara Maffei, which she en-
trusted, upon her death-bed, to Antonio Lazzati and
Tullo Masarani, and which are now preserved in the
Brera Library at Milan, show a clear, keen vision.
The following letter of the great composer, written in
1870, explains itself.
Dear Clarina :
This disaster to France makes me, as it does you, desolate at heart.
It is true that the blague, the impertinence, and the presumption of the
French was and still is, in spite of all their misfortunes, unbearable.
But, after all, France has given liberty and civilization to the modern
world. And if she fall, let us not deceive ourselves : all our liberties
and our civilizations will perish with her. Let our savants and our
politicians boast, if they will, the knowledge, the science, and even (God
forgive them) , the arts of these conquerors ; but if they looked beneath
the surface they could see that in their veins still flows the ancient
blood of the Goths, that they are inordinately haughty, hard, intolerant,
disdainful of everything not German, and of a rapacity that knows no
limit.
[151]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
Men with brains, but without hearts, a strong race but not
civilized ! And that King, who has God and Providence forever on his
lips, and whose aid is destroying the best part of Europe who
believes himself predestined to reform the customs and punish the
faults of the modern world ! What a type of missionary ! Attila of
old (another missionary of the same calibre), halted before the majesty
of the capital of the old world; but this man is about to bombard the
capital of the modern world ; and now that Bismarck wishes it known
that Paris will be spared, I fear more than ever that it will be ruined,
at least in part. Why ? I cannot tell. Perhaps so that it will no longer
exist so beautiful a capital, the like of which they will never succeed
in building.
Poor Paris, that I saw so gay, so beautiful, so splendid, last April !
And then ? I would have liked a more generous policy ; I would have
liked to repay a debt of gratitude. One hundred thousand of our men
might perhaps have saved France. At any rate, to sign a peace, van-
quished with the French, I would have preferred to this inertia which
will one day make us scorned. We will not be able to avoid a European
war, and we will be swallowed up. It will not be to-morrow, but it
will be. The pretext is readily found. Maybe Rome the Mediter-
ranean and then is there not the Adriatic, which they have already
proclaimed to be a German sea ?
Affectionately yours,
GIUSEPPE VERDI.
[152]
,.: Artattto >artorto, % printer
'"'-'.""" of JKalg at Har
Jn 3Uft5 Jtalu, Number of <2ty? lournal of Amrrtran ^tetorn. are
of % nprrb Uar r*n*B
Artist ano Valiant fcoloter
BY
ETTORE CADORIN
RISTIDE SARTORIO, most representative among the
artists of Italy who had produced works of great
value in the period that preceded the War, he achieved
fame rather late in life. Born a Roman, he spent
several years abroad, strengthening his gifts by a
serious and solid study which made of him a very
strong and powerful designer. His drawing has
always been the most important base of his art. His admirable nudes,
a predominant element of his works, show, in grandeur of pose and
harmony of form, a classical line combined with a certain modernity
of expression which results in an ensemble quite personal and interest-
ing. His art is a glorification of form and of movement. His painted
figures are statues, the mastery of the claireobscure make them look
like bas-reliefs. In fact, it is not a vain word to say that he is a
sculptor who paints as he is a good sculptor as well and in his
works, painted or carved, the energy of expression of the figures never
exceeds the faultless perfection of the bodies and elect proportion of
the limbs.
[153]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
The decoration of the new Palace of Parliament in Rome is Sar-
torio's greatest work, composed of several hundred colossal figures
and horses, one of the most remarkable works of that kind in our time.
Very important also is the mural decoration of the great Hall of the
Exhibition of Venice, in the same style and conception.
When Italy entered the War, Sartorio, although not very young,
volunteered as an officer of cavalry. During an engagement he was
surrounded, wounded, and made a prisoner, just as he was trying to
save his beloved horse. After a year and a half of imprisonment and
hard suffering, he was sent back to Italy amongst the prisoners con-
sidered disabled. Since then he has devoted his activity and his art
to the illustration of the War. His work will constitute a splendid
document of the great struggle for freedom and for mankind.
[154]
of Stalg
of tUjp National Ifiatortral &omly and (Dtljf rn IBljo ^
(grnrroitalu. (Contribute tunwrfc &prnal UtBtribution of
3talg Number of 0% lonrnal of
Amwiran
AN ITALIAN GENTLEMAN, $1,000
MRS. FREDERICK DELANO HITCH, $110
MRS. OBED J. WILSON, $100
MR. FRANK R. KIMBALL, $51
MR. HIRAM W. SIBLEY, $50
THE HONORABLE ARTHUR W. DENNIS, $35
MRS. WILLIAM G. MENDINHALL, $30
ALFRED TUCKERMAN, PH. D., $30
MRS. JAMES E. POPE, $27
Miss LUCILE THORNTON, $27
MRS. H. M. BARKSDALE, $25
MRS. J. HULL BROWNING, $25
SIGMUND EISNER COMPANY, $25
MR. SIGMUND EISNER, $5
MRS. JOHN GATES, $25
MR. A. AUGUSTUS HEALY, $25
THE HONORABLE JoHN'H. HUNGATE, $25
COLONEL ALBERT A. POMEROY, $25
MRS. BALDWIN DAY SPILMAN, $25
MR. A. BLAIR THAW, $25
CAPTAIN PHILIP B. WHITEHEAD, $25
MRS. ALLEN CURTIS, $20
Miss M. PETREA MCCLINTOCK, $16
MRS. A. MARTIN PIERCE, $16
MRS. HIRAM PRICE DILLON, $15
Miss E. B. SCRIPPS, $15
MRS. L. A. SCOTT, $13
Miss MARIANNE CLARKE, $11
THE REVEREND LEWIS FRANCIS, D. D., $11
MRS. EMILY J. FRISBIE, $11
MRS. EDWARD M. HARTLEY, $11
MRS. CHARLES W. MACHEN, $11
Miss CAROLINE PEARSON, $11
MRS. NATHAN ANTHONY, $10
MR. W. H. BECKER, $10
MR. L. E. BEHYMER, $10
MRS. JOSEPH A. BOWEN, $10
MRS. MARY E. BUCKNUM, $10
DOCTOR W. B. CARPENTER, $10
Miss NELLIE P. CARTER, $10
MR. J. GLENN COOK, $10
MR. JAMES DOBSON CRUMP, $10
MRS. WILLIAM WARD DAKE, $10
MRS. HENRY M. ELLSWORTH, $10
COLONEL H. S. FOSTER, $10
MR. O. F. FULLER, $10
MR. O. P. HAUSE, $10
MR. J. C. HAYDEN, $10
MRS. DWIGHT B. HEARD, $10
MR. JOSEPH M. HIXON, $10
MR. CHARLES A. HOPPIN, $10
MRS. ELLA P. HUBBARD, $10
Miss LETITIA A. HUMPHREYS, $10
Miss MARGARET A. JACKSON, $10
MRS. WILLIAM S. KIMBALL, $10
THE HONORABLE E. B. KING, $10
GEORGE A. LAWRENCE, LL. D., $10
MRS. EUGENE B. LAWSON, $10
MRS. C. E. LONGLEY, $10
Miss MARIAN B. MAURICE, $10
THE HONORABLE JOSIAH S. MAXCY, $10.
MRS. E. L. BREESE NORRIE, $10
MR. T. H. HOGE PATTERSON, $10
LIEUTENANT TULLIO RAGGIO, $10
MR. H. S. REDFIELD, $10
MR. E. P. REICHHELM, $10
MR. NELSON OSGOOD RHOADES, $10
MRS. EDWARD ROTAN, $10
LIEUTENANT JACOPO SANNAZZARO, $10
MR. SAMUEL SHAW, $10
MRS. WILLIAM T. SIMPSON, $10
MR. ANDREW SMITH, $10
MR. FRANCIS DREXEL SMITH, $10
MRS. MOODY B. SMITH, $10
MRS. JAMES TALCOTT, $10
MRS. C. C. VIALL, $10
MR. I. C. WHITE, $10
MR. CLARENCE HORACE WICKHAM, $10
MRS. MARY HATCH WILLARD, $10
THE REVEREND CHARLES WOOD, $10
[155]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
Ct iwtrilmtumH Heaa tijau Srtt DiUlara
MRS. CLEMUEL R. WOODIN
Miss HELENA R. BAILEY
MRS. CHARLES KEIGHLEY
T. RICHARD PAGANELLI, M. D.
MR. ALBERT DICKINSON
Miss EMMA M. BUCCINI
MRS. JOHN W. CLARK
PRESQUE ISLE CHAPTER, DAUGHTERS OF THE
AMERICAN REVOLUTION
LIEUTENANT GIORGIO ABETTI
Miss ADELINE E. ACKLEY
MR. A. R. BAILEY
MR. GUIDO BARBANTI
DOCTOR G. A. BARRICELLI
DOCTOR CARL G. EARTH
MRS. G. L. BEER
MRS. GEORGE S. BILLMEYER
MRS. GASTON BOYD
THE HONORABLE W. C. BRISTOL
MR. MARIO CHELLINI
MR. WILLIAM L. CURTIS
MR. J. A. DEMPWOLF
MRS. FRANK F. Dow
MR. JOSIAH E. FERNALD
THE HONORABLE EDWIN W. FISKE
MRS. Louis FLICKINGER
MR. WILLIAM H. FOBES -
MR. FRANK DEAN FRAZER
MR. ARISTIDE GERVASINI
MR. HECTOR GRASSI
MRS. SUMMERFIELD HAGERTY
THE HONORABLE W. O. HART
Miss C. HAZARD
MR. CHARLES M. HIGGINS
MRS. JULIA STOW LOVEJOY
Miss HELEN L. MILLER
MR. EDWARD BRADLEY MORRIS
MR. W. H. MOULTON
MR. GEORGE G. MUTH
D. L. PAGE, M. D.
MRS. GEORGE W. RADFORD
MR. J. T. REEDER
MR. JOHN L. ROEMER
LIEUTENANT ROMOLO ANGELONI
CAV. CAMILLO SANTARELLI
LIEUTENANT ALBERICO SARNO
PROFESSOR ARTURO SERGIO
Miss JULIA A. SHEPARD
EDWARD W. SMITH, M. D.
MR. G. RANDOLPH STAGG
Miss A. C. STEWART
MRS. WILLIAM A. STONE
MR. C. F. STRECKER
MR. CHARLES I. THAYER
MR. GRANVILLE G. VALENTINE
MR. J. B. WHITE
MRS*. ROBERT FOWLER CUMMINGS
CAPTAIN HENRY Louis STICK, M. D.
Miss A. MARIS BOGGS
MR. ARTHUR EUGENE BONN
MRS. P. M. CHASE
MRS. JULIA PATTERSON CHURCHILL
MR. G. CIVOLARI
MR. R. C. COLMAN
MR. Louis M. FULTON
MRS. T. HARRISON GARRETT
MR. T. D. HOBART
THE HONORABLE JESSE HOLDOM
MRS. CAROLINE S. HOWELL
MRS. ARTHUR LEE
MR. W. R. MANDIGO
MRS. BENJAMIN MILLER
MR. J. R. MOLONY
MRS. H. H. OSGOOD
MR. A. C. PAUL
MR. ROSCOE PIERCE
DOCTOR WENTZLE RUML
MR. D. E. SWINEHART
MR. MILO M. ACKER
Miss SUSAN C. AMORY
MR. JOHN J. BLAIR
MR. PAUL BLATCHFORD
Miss S. F. BEOADHEAD
BRIGADIER-GENERAL A. R. BUF*FINGTON
MR. E. A. BURNSIDE
THE HONORABLE FRANK W. CLANCY
Miss EMMA B. CROFT
MR. I. H. DEWEY
MRS. A. G. DURFEE
MR. SAMUEL E. ELMORE
THE HONORABLE W. W. GRIEST
THE HONORABLE DELBERT J. HAFF
MRS. ELLEN B. HARRAL
Miss SARAH B. HASTINGS
THE REVEREND WILLIAM L. HAYWARD
MR. JOHN P. HUTCHINSON
MRS. ROBERT J. KILPATRICK
MRS. E. O. KlMBERLEY
MR. ROBERT H. LANYON
MR. ERNEST M. LOEB
DOCTOR A. B. LYONS
MR. A. C. MATHER
MRS. W. H. MCCLURE
MRS. LOTTIE L. MCFERREN
MR. T. HARBINE MONROE
MRS. NATHAN MORSE
DOCTOR GIOVANNI PACCIONE
P. PELUSO, M. D.
MR. WILLIAM H. PHIPPS
P. G. SPINELLI, M. D.
MR. M. D. TOWNSEND
MRS. C. J. TRAIN
Miss MARY F. WOOD
MR. WILLIAM FREDERIC BADE
[156]
FRIENDS OF ITALY
MR. J. E. BANKS
MRS. R. T. BARTON
MRS. THEODORE C. BATES
MR. FRANK A. BOSWORTH
Miss MARGARET R. BRENDLINGER
MRS. VIOLA A. BROMLEY
MR. G. L. BROW NELL
THE REVEREND JOSEPH BRUNN
Miss HATTIE E. BURCH
THE HONORABLE THOMAS BURKE
ALICE BURRITT, M. D.
MR. JOSEPH CAMPEGGIO
MR. ENRICO CARUSO
MRS. L. C. CLARK
DR. G. C. CONNETT
LIEUTENANT VINCENZO CORRICE
THE HONORABLE SALVATORE A. COTILLO
MR. THEODORE COTONIO
Miss EDITH COOKE
THE HONORABLE PAUL D. CRAVATH
Miss ANNA LAWRENCE CRAWFORD
THE REVEREND WALTER J. CRONIN
MRS. W. L. DAGGETT
Miss A. DENEGRE
MR. JOSEPH DEUTSCH
MRS. FRANCES A. B. DUNNING
MRS. M. E. DWIGHT
MRS. HENRY A. EBERT
Miss ELIZABETH E. ELLMAKER
THE HONORABLE ELAM FISHER
MRS. CLAIBORNE J. FOSTER
MR. G. A. FOWLER
MRS. B. E. GALLUP
MR. LEONARD H. GILES
MR. JAMES' M. GLEASON
MR. CHARLES F. GRAFF
MRS. B. M. GRIFFITH
MR. WILFRID M. HAGEH
MRS. MARY E. NEAL HANAFORD
MR. T. S. HENDERSON
MRS. J. F. HICKS
MRS. CHARLES S. HINCHMAN
MR. H. J. HOLT
MR. ORA HOWARD
HYANNIS STATE NORMAL SCHOOL
THE REVEREND VINCENT JANNUZZI
G. CHAPIN JENKINS, M. D.
MR. H. N. KELSEY
MR. CAMILLO LANDRIANI
MR. MOSES E. LIPPETT
DOCTOR H. J. LOEBINGER
MR. OZRO T. LOVE
MR. M. I. LUDINGTON
MR. F. ROBERT MAGER
Miss NANCY L. MILLER
MR. E. B. MITCHELL
MR. JAMES E. MORRIS
MR. DAN MURPHY
MR. JOHN D. MUSANTE
Miss CARRIE BLAIR NEELY
M*. B. D. NICOLA
Awro. LUIGI PAGANO
MR. JAMES K. PENFIELD
DOCTOR A. PESKIND
MRS. M. R. PEN DELL
MRS. D. W. PIPES, SR.
MR. F. E. PLATT
THE HONORABLE H. R. POLLARD
RACINE PUBLIC LIBRARY
MR. T. A. RALSTON
MRS. WILLIAM RENWICK
MR. D. M. RIORDAN
MRS. W. C. ROBERTS
LIEUTENANT PIF.TRO ROCCA
MRS. HENRY W. ROGERS
MR. S. SAITTA
DOCTOR A. SCATURRO
DOCTOR FRANCIS E. SHINE
THE REVEREND M. D. SHUTTER
MR. MAURICE E. SKINNER
MRS. MARTIN SLAUGHTER
Miss KATHLEEN K. SLINGLUFF
THE REVEREND E. COMBIE SMITH
CAPTAIN HARVARD PAYSON SMITH
MRS. JAMES GRIST STATON
MRS. MARY V. H. STEINMETZ
MRS. CHARLES L. TECKLER
MR. HENRY THANE
MR. FREDERICK M. TOWNLEY
MR. EDWARD L. UNDERWOOD
MR. M. VAN EVERY
MR. A. G. VAN NOSTRAND
THE REVEREND J. W. VAVOLO
MR. GEORGF. W. VERITY
MR. JOHN M. WHITEHEAD
MRS. HARRY PAINE WHITNEY
MRS. ROBERT A. WILLIAMS
[157]
111
' \
CQ
IN
5 -*
PUBLISHED BY
THE NATIONAL HISTORICAL SOCIETY
ENTERED AT THE POST OFFICE AT GREENFIELD, INDIANA
AS MAIL MATTER OF THE SECOND CLASS
afmmral 0f Ammnm Kftafcirg
Inhmt* X3JJ. dwnttb (puart^r, Numhrr 2
April Hag Juttf
1919
LONDON B. F. Stevens & Brown
4 Trafalgar Square, W. C.
PARIS Brentano's
37, Avenue de 1'Opera
DUBLIN
EDINBURGH.
MADRID
ROME
. Combridge and Company
18 Orafton Street
.Andrew Elliott
17 Princes Street
. LibreHa Intemaclonal de
Adrian Homo, Alcala 5
. L. Plale
1 Piazza dl Spagna
PETROGRAD. . .. Wat kins and Company
Marskaia No. 36
CAIRO F. Dlemer
Shepheard'a Building
BOMBAY T barker and Company Limited
planade Road
TOKIO Methodist Publishing House
2 Shichome. Gla Ginza
MKXICO CITY. . . American Book and Printing Co.
1st San Francisco No. 12
ATHENS. Const Blectherondakla
Place de la Constitution
BUENOS AYRE9. John Grant and Son
Calle Cangallo 409
3l0urnal at Ammran ijtHionj
(Barter Ninrtwn Ntnrtmt
VOLUME XIII APRIL MAY JUNE NUMBER 2
JJrniUirrii Iw uJhr National IjtHtoriral (ttompattg, in (Quarterly
jtfonr Sunks to tip llolnm?, at Jfanr Siillara Anmuiliu. .
lollar a (Eojifl for fcfotgl* NnmbrrB, for
Natinnal t
Copyright, 1919, fry 77* National Historical Society
Publication Office: 240 Hamilton Street, Albany, New York. Ira G. Payne, Manager
Editorial Offices: 37 West Thirty-ninth Street, New York
(Dfiirrrs of SJjp National Editorial lirrrtorfi of hf loimtal
ifiotortral ^urtrtii of Amrrtran fitatnry
FIANK ALLABEN, President FRANK ALLABEN, Editor-in-Chief
MABEL T. R. WASHBUBN, Secretary MABEL T. R. WASHBUKN, Genealogical Editor
DUDLEY BUTLER, Treasurer JOHN FOWLER MITCHELL, JR., Associate Editor
(grand QJounrtl of tl|r
Arkaitiiau MRS. J. H. Me EL HINNEY
PHILANDER KEEP ROOTS Daughters of the American Revolution
George Washington Memorial As-
sociation (ftoloraoo
MRS. Louis FLICKINGER MRS. JOHN LLOYD MCNEIL
State Recording Secretary Daughters Past Regent, Colorado, Daughters of
of the American Revolution the American Revolution
MRS. THOMAS MOSES CORY
Daughters of the American Revolution (nmirrtir ut
(California Miss ADELINE E. ACKLEY
ROY MALCOM, A. M., PH. D.
Professor of History, University of fitatrirt of (daluttlbia
Southern California MRS. HENRY F. DIMOCK
MRS. CYRUS WALKER President George Washington Me-
HONORABLE NATHAN W. BLANCHARD, morial Association
A. M. Ex-California Representative CAPTAIN ALBERT HARRISON VAN
NELSON OSGOOD RHOADES DEUSEN
Mayflower Society, Colonial Wars, Holland Society, Sons of the Amcri-
Sons of the Revolution can Revolution
[165]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
LEWIS HORN FISHER, LL. M.
Secretary United States Civil Service,
Fourth District
Jtlorfta
MRS. CLAUDE STELLE TINGLEY, B. S.,
M. A.
SISTER ESTHER CARLOTTA, S. R.
Ex-President Florida Division United
Daughters of the Confederacy
ifaman
GEORGE P. CASTLE
WILLIAM D. WESTERVELT
HONORABLE JOHN H. HUNGATE
President First National Bank, La
Harpe
MRS. GEORGE A. LAWRENCE
Honorary State Regent for life, Illi-
nois Daughters of the American
Revolution
MRS. HENRY CLAY PURMORT
Life-Member Society Mayflower
Descendants in Illinois
A. G. ZIMMERMAN, M. D.
Jttfctatta
JOHN FOWLER MITCHELL
President William Mitchell Printing
Company
HONORABLE GEORGE H. COOPER
Cashier Greenfield Citizens' Bank
SHERMAN IRA POOL
Sons of the American Revolution,
Iowa State Historical Society
EDWIN WELCH BURCH
First President Iowa Baptist Brother-
hood
CHARLES ALEXANDER KEITH, B. A.
OXON.
History and Civics, East Kentucky
Normal School
MRS. WILLIAM H. THOMPSON
Vice-President General, National So-
ciety Daughters of the American
Revolution
Miss MARY NATHALIE BALDY
fflatnr
Miss NELLIE WOODBURY JORDAN
Instructor in History, State Normal
MRS. EDWARD EDES SHEAD
fHarglatti
HUGH MACLELLAN SOUTHGATE, B. S.
American Institute Electrical Engi-
neers
JOHN GLENN COOK
ALPHONZO BENJAMIN BOWERS, C. E.
President Atlantic Harbor Railroad
Company
HENRY Louis STICK, M. D.
Superintendent Hospital Cottages for
Children, Baldwinsville
J. VAUGHAN DENNETT
New England Historical and Genea-
logical Society
MRS. Louis PRANG
President Roxbury Civic Club
MRS. SARAH BOWMAN VAN NESS
Honorary Life Regent, Lexington,
Daughters of the American Revolu-
tion
Miss CAROLINE BORDEN
Trustee American College, Constan-
tinople
[166]
GRAND COUNCIL OP THE VICE-PRESIDENTS
MRS. CARL F. KAUFMANN
FRANK REED KIM BALL
Society of Colonial Wars, Sons of the
American Revolution
FREDERICK W. MAIN, M. D.
Jackson Chamber of Commerce
MRS. JAMES H. CAMPBELL
State President, United States Daugh-
ters of 1812
MRS. FORDYCE HUNTINGTON ROGERS
Ex-Dean Women, Olivet College
MRS. FREDERICK BECKWITH STEVENS
fflutncBOta
MRS. MARY ELIZABETH BUCKNUM
Minneapolis Chapter, Daughters of
the American Revolution
Miss LUELLA AGNES OWEN
Fellow American Association for the
Advancement of Science and Amer-
ican Geographical Society
iXrhraaka
T. J. FITZPATRICK, M. S.
Fellow American Association for the
Advancement of Science
MRS. ERASTUS GAYLORD PUTNAM
Honorary Vice- President General,
National Society Daughters of the
American Revolution
ELEANOR HAINES, M. D.
Life-Member, New Jersey Historical
Society
MRS. JOSEPH DORSETT BEDLE
Past President New Jersey Society
of Colonial Dames
MRS. ORVILLE T. WARING
New Jersey Colonial Dames, New
Jersey Historical Society
MRS. RUTH E. FAIRCHILD
Life-Member Daughters of the Amer-
ican Revolution, Member New Jer-
sey Colonial Dames, Life-Member
New Jersey Historical Society
MRS. JAMES E. POPE
Nrro Jflrxtro
HON. L. BRADFORD PRINCE, LL. D.
Ex-Governor, President Historical So-
ciety of New Mexico
Sfatt fork
REVEREND GEORGE CLARKE HOUGHTON,
D. D.
Society of Colonial Wars, Sons of the
Revolution
CHARLES JACKSON NORTH
Life- Member Buffalo Historical So-
ciety
HENRY E. HUNTINGTON
President Los Angeles Railway Cor-
poration, Society of Colonial Wars,
Sons of the Revolution
JOSEPH A. MCALEBNAN
Associate Member Explorers' Club
FRANK JOSEF Louis WOUTERS
President Oleogravure Co., Inc.
OTTO MARC EIDLITZ
Ex-Tenement House Commissioner
MRS. BENJAMIN SILLIMAN CHURCH
Incorporator and Past Vice- President
Colonial Dames, New York
[167]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
MRS. FREDERICK F. THOMPSON
Vice- President George Washington
Memorial Association
MRS. HENRY FAIRFIELD OSBORN
Philanthropist, Trustee Barnard Col-
lege
MRS. JOHN CARSTENSEN
MRS. ALICE B. TWEEDY
National Society Daughters of the
American Revolution
MRS. MELVILLE AUGUSTUS JOHNSON
Director Onondaga County Historical
Association
MRS. CORNELIA E. S. HOLLEY
Chapin Association
MRS. HENRY A. STRONG
Life-Member George Washington
Memorial Association
Miss MAY OSBORNE
National Society Daughters of the
American Revolution
MRS. VIOLA A. BROMLEY
Fort Greene Chapter, Daughters of
the American Revolution
MRS. W. B. SYLVESTER
Founder and Honorary Regent, Mon-
roe Chapter, Daughters of the
American Revolution
MRS. NELLIS MARATHON RICH
National Society Founders and Pa-
triots of America
MRS. J. HULL BROWNING
MRS. WILLIAM WARD DAKE
Miss MARGARET A. JACKSON
G. ALFRED LAWRENCE, M. D., PH. D.
New York Academy of Medicine,
Sons of the American Revolution
Miss LUCILE THORNTON
CHARLES FREDERICK QUINCY
Chairman, Executive Committee,
American Forestry Association
X'urth iakota
C. HERSCHEL KOYL, PH. D.
Fellow Johns Hopkins University
HONORABLE B. F. WIRT
President Equity Savings and Loan
Company
S. O. RICHARDSON, JR.
Vice-President Libbey Glass Company
MRS. OBED J. WILSON
Life-Member George Washington
Memorial Association
MRS. HOWARD JONES
Life-Member Ohio Archaeological and
Historical Society
MRS. JOHN GATES
Life-Member George Washington
Memorial Association
MRS. JOHN SANBORN CONNER
Life-Member George Washington
Memorial Association
Miss MARIE A. HIBBARD
Daughters of the American Revolu-
tion, Toledo Art Museum Associa-
tion
MRS. GUSSIE DEBENATH OGDEN
Life-Member Mercantile Library, Cin-
cinnati
FREDERICK J. TRUMPOUR
W. B. CARPENTER, M. D.
Sons of the American Revolution,
Vice-President Columbus Mutual
Life Insurance Company
B. F. STRECKER
President The Citizens National Bank
of Marietta
[168]
GRAND COUNCIL OF THE VICE-PRESIDENTS
(Drrgon
DAVID N. MOSESSOHN
Lawyer, Publisher and Editor The
Oregon Country
FRANCIS AUGUSTUS LOVELAND
President Chrome and Beck Tanning
Companies
PERCEVAL K. GABLE
JOSEPH J. DESMOND
President Corry Citizens' National
Bank
GEORGE T. BUSH
Life-Member Sons of the Revolution
MRS. FREDERIC PICKETT
Miss MARY MEILY
ALFRED TUCKERMAN, PH. D.
American Association for the Ad-
vancement of Science
Virginia
MRS. BALDWIN DAY SPILMAN
Past Vice-President General,
tional Society Daughters of the
American Revolution
MRS. LEVIN THOMAS CARTWRIGHT
Virginia Historical Society, Daugh-
ters of the American Revolution,
United Daughters of the Confed-
eracy
Vast Virginia
C. M. BOGER, M. D.
Ex-President International Hahne-
mann Association
MAJOR WILLIAM H. COBB
Director General, Knights of Wash-
ington
liiaronfiin
MRS. ANDREW M. JOYS
Honorary Life- President,
Chapter, Daughters of
and Patriots of America
EDWIN MONTGOMERY BAILEY
MRS. FRANCES A. BAKER DUNNING
Wisconsin
Founders
Na- MRS. ALFRED B. SCOTT
of ttjr &tat* Afcuianry Saarfca
MRS. PHILLIPS M. CHASE
Society of Colonial Dames
JMM
MRS. SHERMAN IRA POOL
State Historian, Iowa, Daughters of
the American Revolution
IHargland
JOHN GLENN COOK
American Association for the Ad-
vancement of Science
ARTHUR F. ESTABROOK
American Academy of Political and
Social Science
CHARLES LYMAN NEWHALL
George Washington Memorial As-
sociation
Nroifork
HONORABLE GEORGE D. EMERSON
Ex-Member New York State Senate
HENRY PARSONS
Military Order of the Loyal Legion
[169]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
MRS. FRANK FOWLER Dow lUiobr
Regent Irondequoit Chapter Daugh- MRS. CHARLES EDMUND LONGLEY
ters of the American Revolution State Regent, Rhode Island, Daugh-
MRS. GEORGE GEDNEY SANDS ters of the American Revolution
MRS. GEORGE C. CLAUSEN
MRS. EDWARD ROTAN
FRANK SERVIS MASTEN Daughters of the American Revolution
1170|
of Snrorjmration of
National ifiBtoriral ;
nndrc ihr Eauia of thr Stslrtrt of (Columbia
at Haaljino,ton. on thr amr ntu,-i*tb Bag of April, in Ihr
Jrar of (Itor Horo, Ninrtwn ^nnorro ano JTtftwn, "For
Ihr lIurpiiBr of Promoting ijiatnriral luuiuilroo/ and
Jatriotiam. ano tljr Jrarr of IxujhlrnuBnrBH among
Nations"
| HE NAME by which the Society is to be
known is " The National Historical So-
ciety."
The Society is to continue in perpe-
tuity.
The particular business and objects of
the Society will be:
(a) To discover, procure, preserve, and perpetuate
whatever relates to History, the History of the Western
Hemisphere, the History of the United States of America
and their possessions, and the History of families.
(b) To inculcate and bulwark patriotism, in no par-
tisan, sectional, nor narrowly national sense, but in recog-
nition of man's high obligation toward civic righteousness,
believing that human governments are divinely ordained
to bear the sword and exercise police duty for good against
evil, and not for evil against good, and recognizing, as be-
tween peoples and peoples, that " God has made of one
blood all nations of men."
(c) To provide a national and international patri-
otic clearing-house and historical exchange, promoting by
suitable means helpful forms of communication and co-
operation between all historical organizations, patriotic or-
ders, and kindred societies, local, state, national, and inter-
national, that the usefulness of all may be increased and
their benefits extended toward education and patriotism.
[171]
(d) To promote the work of preserving historic
landmarks and marking historic sites.
(e) To encourage the use of historical themes and
the expression of patriotism in the arts.
(/) In the furtherance of the objects and purposes
of the Society, and not as a commercial business, to acquire
The Journal of American History, and to publish the same
as the official organ of the Society, and to publish or pro-
mote the publication of whatever else may seem advisable
in furtherance of the objects of the Society.
(g) To authorize the organization of members of
the Society, resident in given localities, into associated
branch societies, or chapters of the parent Society, and to
promote by all other suitable means the purpose, objects,
and work of the Society.
The Membership body of The National Historical
Society consists of
(1) Original Founders, contributing five dollars
each to the Founders' Fund, thus enrolling as pioneer
builders of a great National Institution ;
(2) Original State Advisory Board Founders, con-
tributing twenty-five dollars each to the Founders' Fund,
from whom are elected the Members of the State Advisory
Boards ;
(3) Original Life-Member Founders, contributing
one hundred dollars each to the Founders' Fund, from
whom are elected for life the members of the Grand Coun-
cil of the Vice-Presidents ;
(4) Patrons, who contribute one thousand dollars
to further the work of the Society;
(5) Annual Members, who pay two dollars, annual
dues, receiving The Journal of American History.
(6) Sustaining Members, who contribute five dol-
lars, annual dues, receiving The Journal of American
History.
(7) Sustaining Life-Members, who contribute one
hundred dollars annually.
(8) Sustaining Contributors, who contribute an-
nually any sum between five dollars and one hundred
dollars.
[172]
abb nf (Enntotta
TITLE-PAGE DESIGN 163
BOARD OF EDITORIAL DIRECTORS AND OFFICIAL
ORGANIZATION 165
ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF THE NATIONAL
HISTORICAL SOCIETY 171
VICTOR EMANUEL III, KING OF ITALY. ENGRAVING
FROM THE PHOTOGRAPH DONATED BY THE KING TO THE
EDITOR OF " IL CARROCCIO/' THE ITALIAN REVIEW, MR.
AGOSTINO DE BIASI, AND BY THE LATTER'S COURTESY
REPRODUCED IN THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY 177
PATRIOTISM THE AFFIRMATION OF GOD His
Eminence, Desire Joseph Francois, Cardinal Mercier,
Archbishop of Malines 181
HOW THE MOUNTAIN OF RHEIMS WAS SAVED
Luigi Barzini, War Correspondent of "II Corriere delta
Sera" of Milan 182
ILLUSTRATIONS
AN ITALIAN SOLDIER IN FRANCE, FIGHTING
FOR THE DEFENCE OF RHEIMS. ENGRAVING 178
PROVISIONING THE ITALIAN TROOPS IN
FRANCE. ENGRAVING 179
ITALIAN SOLDIERS BEFORE THE CATHEDRAL
OF RHEIMS. ENGRAVING 180
A STUDY IN PUTNAM AND CLEAVELAND ANCES-
TRY Georgia Cooper Washburn 188
ILLUSTRATION
PUTNAM COAT-OF-ARMS. ENGRAVING IN COLORS
FROM A PAINTING Front Cover
[173]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
ITALIAN SOLDIERS IN THE DOLOMITE ALPS. RE-
PRODUCED THROUGH THE COURTESY OF MR. AGOSTINO DE
BIASI, EDITOR OF " IL CARROCCIO/' THE ITALIAN REVIEW.
ENGRAVING 213
THE FIRST AMERICAN TROOPS IN ITALY DURING
THE WORLD WAR. REPRODUCED THROUGH THE
COURTESY OF MR. AGOSTINO DE BIASI, EDITOR OF " IL
CARROCCIO/' THE ITALIAN REVIEW. ENGRAVING 214
VITTORIO EMANUELE ORLANDO, PREMIER OF
ITALY. REPRODUCED THROUGH THE COURTESY OF MR.
AGOSTINO DE BIASI, EDITOR OF " IL CARROCCIO," THE
ITALIAN REVIEW. ENGRAVING 214
THE ANCIENT ARENA AT POLA. REPRODUCED THROUGH
THE COURTESY OF MR. AGOSTINO DE BIASI, EDITOR OF " IL
CARROCCIO/' THE ITALIAN REVIEW. ENGRAVING 215
FIUME. REPRODUCED THROUGH THE COURTESY OF MR. AGOS-
TINO DE BIASI, EDITOR OF " IL CARROCCIO," THE ITALIAN
REVIEW. ENGRAVING 215
COASTS OF THE ADRIATIC SEA. REPRODUCED THROUGH
THE COURTESY OF MR. AGOSTINO DE BIASI, EDITOR OF fc IL
CARROCCIO/' THE ITALIAN REVIEW. ENGRAVED MAP 216
AN AMERICAN SEA CAPTAIN IN THE REVOLUTION.
THE PERSONAL NARRATIVE OF CAPTAIN LUTHER LITTLE,
BEFORE, DURING, AND AFTER THE REVOLUTIONARY WAR.
TRANSCRIBED FROM THE COPY IN THE POSSESSION OF MR.
JOHN MASON LITTLE OF BOSTON. Concluded from The
Journal of American History, Volume XI, Number j 217
ILLUSTRATIONS
CAPTAIN LUTHER LITTLE. REPRODUCED FROM THE
PAINTING IN OILS OWNED BY HIS GRANDCHILDREN,
MR. LUTHER LITTLE AND Miss JOANNA LITTLE OF
BOSTON. ENGRAVING 233
THE OLD WELL IN THE KITCHEN OF CAPTAIN
LUTHER LITTLE'S HOUSE, SEA VIEW,
MARSHFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS. EN-
GRAVING 234
[174]
TABLE OF CONTENTS
REAR VIEW OF CAPTAIN LITTLE'S HOUSE. EN-
GRAVING 234
CAPTAIN LUTHER LITTLE'S DESK IN HIS OLD
HOME AT MARSHFIELD, MASSACHU-
SETTS. ENGRAVING 235
THE FRONT DOOR-WAY OF THE OLD LITTLE
HOUSE. ENGRAVING 235
FAC-SIMILE OF A DANISH DOCUMENT IN CON-
NECTION WITH CAPTAIN LITTLE'S RUS-
SIAN AND SCANDINAVIAN TRADING EX-
PEDITION, 1792. ENGRAVING 236
FAC-SIMILE OF PART OF THE ACCOMPANYING
DANISH DOCUMENT IN CONNECTION
WITH CAPTAIN LITTLE'S RUSSIAN AND
SCANDINAVIAN TRADING EXPEDITION,
1792. ENGRAVING 241
FLEET SIGNALS OF COMMANDER SALTON-
STALL FOR THE PENOBSCOT EXPEDI-
TION, 1779, AS DELIVERED TO CAPTAIN
LUTHER LITTLE. REPRODUCED FROM THE
ORIGINAL IN THE POSSESSION OF MR, LUTHER
LITTLE AND Miss JOANNA LITTLE OF BOSTON. FAC-
SIMILE ENGRAVING 244
THE LATTER PART OF COMMANDER SALTON-
STALL'S FLEET SIGNALS, WITH FAC-SIM-
ILE OF ADDRESS TO CAPTAIN LITTLE, ON
BOARD THE " PIGEON." ENGRAVING 245
FAC-SIMILE AUTOGRAPHS OF CAPTAIN
LUTHER LITTLE. ENGRAVINGS 246, 248-251
FAC-SIMILE OF A RECORD BY CAPTAIN LUTHER
LITTLE OF HIS WOUNDS RECEIVED IN A
VICTORIOUS ENGAGEMENT WITH A BRIT-
ISH SHIP DURING THE REVOLUTIONARY
WAR. REPRODUCED FROM THE ORIGINAL IN THE
POSSESSION OF MR. LUTHER LITTLE AND Miss
JOANNA LITTLE OF BOSTON. ENGRAVING 252
[175]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
TRENTO. REPRODUCED THROUGH THE COURTESY OF MR.
AGOSTINO DE BIASI, EDITOR OF "!L CARROCCIO," THE
ITALIAN REVIEW. ENGRAVING 253
THE REDEEMED CITY OF TRENTO. ENGRAVING 254
DANTE ALIGHIERI. TRENTO'S MONUMENT TO ITALY'S
GREAT POET, THE FORERUNNER OF MILTON, WHO, LIKE
MILTON, USED His GOD-GIVEN GENIUS TO LIFT MEN'S
MINDS TO GOD AND His DEALINGS WITH MEN. ENGRAV-
ING 255
TRIESTE. REPRODUCED THROUGH THE COURTESY OF MR.
AGOSTINO DE BIASI, EDITOR OF " IL CARROCCIO/' THE
ITALIAN REVIEW. ENGRAVING 256
RECOLLECTIONS OF NINETY-FIVE YEARS IN CON-
NECTICUT AND THE ANTHRACITE REGIONS OF
PENNSYLVANIA William Henry Richmond. Con-
cluded from The Journal of American History, Volume
XI, Number 3 257
[176]
VICTOR KM AM KL III, KING OF ITALY
From the photograph donated by tin- Kini: tu tin- Kditor of " II rarn-clo," the
Italian Review, Mr. Agostlno de lliasl. and by the lattrr'a .-onrtesy repro-
duced in The Journal of American History
1
PROVISIONING THE ITALIAN TKOOPS IX FUAXCE
mmran
VOLUME XIII
NINETEEN NINETEEN
NUMBER 2
SECOND QUARTER
patrtnttam tlj? Affirmation of
BY
HIS EMINENCE, DESIRED JOSEPH FRANCOIS, CARDINAL MERCIER
Archbishop of Malines
AMILY interests, class interests, party interests, and the
material good of the individual take their place, in
the scale of values, below the ideal of patriotism, for
that ideal is the right, which is absolute. Further-
more, that ideal is the public recognition of right in
national matters, and of national honor. Now there
is no absolute except God. God alone, by His sanctity
and His sovereignty, dominates all human interests and human wills.
And to affirm the absolute necessity of subordination of all things
to right, to justice, and to truth, is implicity to affirm God.
When, therefore, humble soldiers whose patriotism we praise
answer us with characteristic simplicity, " We only did our duty," or,
' We were bound in honor," they express the religious character of
their patriotism. Which of us does not feel that patriotism is a sacred
thing, and that a violation of national dignity is, in a manner, a profa-
nation and a sacrilege ?
[181]
BY
LUIGI BARZINI
War Correspondent of "II Corriere delta Sera"
of Milan
N THE tremendous Battle of Champagne, which was
the outcome of the fifth great German offensive, the
action of the Italian troops had a special importance,
not so much on account of the number of troops
engaged, as because of the extreme delicacy of the
sector the defense of which was entrusted to their
arms. Placed to guard one of the principal avenues
of a possible German irruption one of the most vital points of the line
of resistance the Italians justly felt that by the confidence of the
Single Command a post of honour had been entrusted to them.
Italians barred the valley of the Ardre at the heights of Bligny.
Look at the map. The River Ardre, flanked by wooded hills, flows
from the Mountain of Rheims, where it takes its source, down to
Fismes, where it pours into the Vesle; and its valley, running from
south-east to north-west, constituted the principal way of the enemy's
advance for turning Rheims from the south-west and for reaching the
green bastions of the Mountain of Rheims, upon the possession of
which depended the domination of Rheims itself, fipernay, and of
Chalons. The city of Rheims, closely invested on three sides east,
north, and west was not directly attacked. It was not necessary.
The line of the enemy's positions around the city figures on the map
like a head attached to a body, the Italian positions to the south-west
and the French positions south-east forming the shoulders. To bring
about the fall of the entire salient and possess themselves of Rheims,
the Germans only had to advance appreciably right and left of Rheims,
pressing on both sides of the neck of that sort of head to effect a
strangulation.
[182]
HOW THE MOUNTAIN OF RHEIMS WAS SAVED
Descending from the Mountain of Rheims, the Ardre is accom-
panied, so to speak, by high counter-forts prolongations of the moun-
tains which follow the course of the river on the right and left like two
immense banks, framing the valley with their tree-clad sides and end-
ing abruptly at the road which runs from Rheims to Chateau Thierry.
The terminal point of one of these counter-forts that on the right
bank, and the higher constitutes the so-called Mountain of Bligny.
The Italian forces barred the high valley of the Ardre precisely at the
point where the river issues from the grip of the counter-forts and
flows between minor heights in a tortuous course towards Fismes.
It was not only the extreme tactical and strategical importance of
the positions, but also the supposed lack of unity and cohesion in the
defense, that induced the Germans to deliver one of their most formid-
able blows against the Italian sector. But the experience of Bligny
had revealed to the enemy an unsuspected robustness in our defense.
In anticipation of an obstinate Italian resistance, the German Com-
mand, in order to be certain of success, had prepared a terrible array
of artillery in front of our sector, had massed between the first and
second lines a number of divisions four times larger than ours, and had
brought up along the low valley of the Ardre some squadrons of heavy
tanks for smashing our defenses on the two banks of the river. We
had against us the 103rd division, the 123rd, the 22nd, and a great
part of the 12th Bavarian division, and of the 80th; in immediate
support were the 223rd and the 50th divisions, without counting other
troops in reserve.
It was the enemy's intention that the blow should be irresistible.
According to the plans of the offensive, the Italian defense had to be
swept away at the first shock: fipernay had to be reached during the
evening of the first day, by the Nanteuil-Hautvillers road, across the
captured Mountain of Rheims. To the Italian command some excel-
lent French units had been entrusted as a reserve. The presence of
these reinforcements permitted us to place in line the whole of the
Italian forces to receive the first shock. The enemy's attack was
launched after a preparatory bombardment, lasting six hours and of
unprecedented intensity six hours of inferno. Explosives and gas
came over in a regular hail of shells of all calibres, and the smoke
shells filled the valley with impenetrable clouds. In this obscurity the
German tanks advanced invisibly at the bottom the valley, machine-
gunning and cannonading on all sides.
[183]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
On the left of the Italian sector the ground, all hills and dales,
lent itself admirably to ''infiltration," in the density of the artificial
mists, and the defense, fighting hand to hand, withdrew to support
itself on the stronger lines prepared in the rear. An analogous move-
ment, carried out very slowly, caused our left wing to bend in the
Valley of the Ardre, where the German tanks formed the tips of dense
wedges of attack. The withdrawal was so orderly, hard-fought, and
slow, that the enemy's enormous self-moving fortresses of steel had to
stop for long hours before they could make even a slight advance.
At noon our left wing held the village of Marf aux at the bottom of the
valley. The right wing, on the north of the Ardre, having reached its
line of resistance, maintained itself there obstinately, delivering furious
counter-attacks. To get the better of them the enemy, at two o'clock
in the afternoon, again began an extremely violent bombardment.
Here the battle raged in a thick wood on the hills flanking the river.
Except at the bottom of the valley, the whole ground is covered with
forests so dense that it is impossible to see anything a few steps away.
Of this invisibility the German attacking troops took advantage to
penetrate with machine guns in numerous streams of infiltration.
The fighting no longer developed along a line; it was dispersed,
like a tremendous hunt. There was ferocious fighting from tree to
tree and from bush to bush. Thus, while the sustaining troops stood
firm, clinging to the positions, the individual fights of the mobile par-
ties raged around them. From the beginning to the end of the battle,
which lasted four days and four nights, all the French and Italian
reports sent out from the commands and the liaison officers ended
with the words "morale very high." Our troops were constantly
inflamed by an aggressive fury. At the sight of the enemy they
invariably rushed to the counter-attack with an admirable spontaneity.
Counter-attacks by platoons, companies, battalions, and regiments,
succeeded each other with impetuous fury. Mortal fatigue, hunger,
burning thirst, and the losses sustained, did nothing to diminish the
sublime fever of combativeness on the part of our men, who still found
numerically superior forces in front of them.
On the evening of the first day our right wing was again com-
pelled to yield a few hundred yards of ground. The left wing, sorely
tried, was reinforced during the night by one of the French units which
formed our reserve. These fresh forces were extended on the extreme
left. The situation was then as follows : our right, oscillated on the
limits of the second zone of resistance, engaged in furious counter-
[184]
HOW THE MOUNTAIN OF RHEIMS WAS SAVED
attacks; our extreme left, following the general movement of the
action and pressed by heavy masses, had retired about 3,000 yards;
and the left centre, which held the base of the Valley of the Ardre,
bent under the heavier weight of the attack, which was following the
course of the river and tending directly towards the majestic wooded
terraces of the Mountain of Rheims, the precious immediate objective
of the enemy's action at that point. Thus there was formed in the
valley a German salient, a sort of tentacle, which, however, was con-
tained on its flanks. In order to advance still further without danger
of a counter-offensive blow on the flanks, the Germans needed to
widen the salient, to give space to the sides of the too slender wedge
thrust into the narrow valley. For this reason, on the second day, the
whole impetuousness of the German attack was turned against the
heights on the left of the Ardre, in order to demolish that flanking
pillar of the resistance.
The French unit, despatched by our command to reinforce our
extreme left, had received the full shock of this new assault, carried
out by fresh troops, even before it had entirely completed its deploy-
ment. Suddenly it found itself under a bombardment of fabulous vio-
lence, followed by an impetuous action of masses. For a moment the
line of defense had to withdraw across the Bois de Courton. The
enemy infiltrations in the dense vegetation reached the eastern edge
of the woods at Nanteuil that is to say, half way between the posi-
tions of departure and Epernay. The Germans had thus practically
reached the margin of the principal massif of the Mountain of Rheims
when, in the first hours of the afternoon, the French on our extreme
left, having reorganized themselves, started a sudden counter-attack,
together with Italian forces, and in indescribable hand-to-hand fight-
ing drove the enemy from the woods. Meanwhile our right also
resumed its furious counter-attacks, thrusting the Germans back as far
as Clairizet, a tiny village close to the first line, which was taken and
lost, retaken and lost again, throughout the day.
We had passed through the most critical phase of the battle.
From time to time, in the swaying of the struggle, the battle reached
our artillery positions. The gunners defended their pieces with rifles,
machine guns, and hand grenades ; there were little violent and spon-
taneous counter-attacks to liberate the guns, which, still warm and
surrounded by dead, resumed firing as soon as the enemy was
driven away.
[185]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
Whenever the Italian counter-attacks languished on the right,
they were resumed on the left. The tactics of our Command con-
sisted in striking incessantly on the flanks of the German salient to
prevent it from being widened and to keep it immobile under the threat
of strangulation. It was a struggle without a pause, full of movement
and fury on the part of the enemy in an effort to open the pincers
which held his sides. On our part, the object was to pinch him still
tighter. We defended ourselves by attacking. But while the Ger-
mans often renewed their attacking forces, the defending troops were
always the same. Meanwhile we had succeeded in paralyzing the
penetration into the high valley of the Ardre. By the evening of the
1 6th our counter-attacks on the left wing were no longer making prog-
ress. With a view to strengthening them, another French unit from
our reserve was sent forward with some Italian storming sections, and
on the morning of the 17th Italians and French together resumed the
assault in the Bois de Courton and by hard fighting succeeded in
regaining our second lines. These had been almost completely reoc-
cupied when the Germans, assembling new forces, returned to the
attack. Thus on the second lines a shifting of equilibrium began, and
the fury of the battle passed again and again over the same points.
While on our left the actions consisted of brief bursts of violence,
on our right the Italian troops, although given orders to confine them-
selves to demonstrative actions, seeing an attack advancing, bounded
forward to meet it and stopped it with the bayonet. On the 18th our
heroic constancy definitely gained the ascendancy over the enemy.
The French and Italian forces on our left resumed their attacks and
progressed gradually up to fixed objectives, while our right, reinforced
by the last reserves, consisting of French colonial troops, definitely
made themselves masters of Clairizet, Onrezy, Bouilly, reconquered
the Bois de Rheims, and practically reoccupied the lines of departure.
The Germans who had penetrated into the valley of the Ardre, held
as in a vice, were obliged to retire in order to escape the danger of being
cut off. Their monstrous attack with tanks had been useless; the
German march on fipernay had ended in disaster; the Mountain of
Rheims was definitely saved.
General Berthelot had given this Order of the Day to the Italian
troops :
H. Q., July 23rd. Entrusted during forty days with the defense
of a delicate part of the front, the II. Italian Corps has completed per-
fectly its mission, barring to the enemy the road to the Ardre and
[186]
HOW THE MOUNTAIN OF RHEIMS WAS SAVED
resisting magnificently the repeated attacks that it had to meet. In
intimate union with French troops it has thrown back all the attacks
of the Germans upon whom sanguinary losses have been inflicted. It
has held the position that had been entrusted to it, and now at last has
begun to take a brilliant part in the offensive against the enemy. The
Latin blood poured out on the soil of France, in common with that
which has been shed in the war-ravaged regions of Italy, will cement
in a most solid way the alliance between the two sister nations and the
indestructible friendship which exists between the two great peoples.
[187]
A ^tiriuj in Jtottram
Aturainj
BY
GEORGIA COOPER WASHBURN
STUDY of the paternal lineage of Erastus Gaylord
Putnam, Esq., of Elizabeth, New Jersey, presents a
picture, fraught with interest, of our colonial days and
of early England. His ancestry has been traced to
the Fourteenth Century, when his earliest named
ancestor, William Puttenham, held Puttenham Manor
in Hertfordshire. Before this period, into the mists
of feudal antiquity, the line is not authenticated, but it is said to
ascend to the Simon de Puttenham who possessed the manor in 1 199.
Mr. Putnam was born in Harford, New York, December 23,
1833. His father, Hamilton Putnam, was born in Madison, New
York, September 5, 1807. He was prominent in the affairs of Cort-
land, in the same State, where he was a merchant for fifty years,
Justice of the Peace, Director of the National Bank of Cortland,
acted as Paymaster in the Militia, and for many years was Super-
visor of Cortland County. His wife, Mr. Erastus Putnam's mother,
was Jeannette, daughter of General Erastus Cleaveland.
The Cleaveland family is descended from Thorkill, a Saxon of
Yorkshire, living at the time of the Conquest, who was called " de
Cliveland," probable from an estate. His descendant, Moses Cleave-
land, ancestor of the American family, came to Massachusetts from
Ipswich, where he was born probably about 1624. He settled at
Woburn, Massachusetts, where he married Ann, daughter of Edward
and Joanna Winn, according to an old record, on " ye 26th 7th mo. . .
1648." She was born in Wales. Grover Cleveland, twice President
of the United States, was a descendant of Moses and Ann (Winn)
[188]
A STUDY IN PUTNAM AND CLEAVELAND ANCESTRY
Cleaveland. Moses Cleaveland died at Woburn, Massachusetts,
January 9, 1701. He and his wife had twelve children. Three of
his sons, Moses, Samuel, and Aaron, were soldiers of King Philip's
War.
Aaron Cleaveland, son of Moses and Ann (Winn) Cleaveland,
was born at Woburn, January 19, 1654, and was made a freeman in
1680. His wife was Dorcas Wilson, whom he married in Woburn,
September 26, 1675. She was born January 29, 1657, the daughter
of John and Hannah (James) Wilson, and died in Cambridge, Massa-
chusetts, November 29, 1714. Aaron Cleaveland died at Woburn,
December 14, 1716.
Captain Aaron Cleaveland, son of Aaron and Dorcas (Wilson)
Cleaveland, was born July 9, 1680, at Woburn. He owned large
tracts of land in Charlestown, and perhaps lived there for some years.
He also lived in that part of Cambridge which became Medford, and
was admitted as a member of the church at Cambridge, October 7,
1711. He was constable of Medford in 1707 and '08, was a con-
tractor and builder, and was prominent in military affairs, being
successively Cornet, Lieutenant, and Captain of militia. After 1738
he removed to East Haddam, Connecticut, where he was admitted to
the church August 10, 1755, and of which place he was one of the
wealthiest citizens. On the tax lists of the town he is called "Aaron
Cleaveland, gentleman." He married at Woburn, January 1, 1701,
Abigail Waters, daughter of Samuel and Mary (Hudson) Waters.
She was born November 29, 1683, in Woburn, and probably died at
Norwich, Connecticut. Captain Aaron Cleaveland died about
December 1, 1755, either at Norwich or at his Massachusetts home
in Medford.
Moses Cleaveland, son of Captain Aaron and Abigail (Waters)
Cleaveland, was baptized at Cambridge, July 19, 1719. His wife
was Mary, daughter of Thomas and Dorothy (Hurlburt) Clarke,
born in Wethersfield, Connecticut, June 9, 1724, and there she mar-
ried Moses Cleaveland. After his death, which occurred before
1761, she married a Mr. Bliss, and died at Hopewell, Ontario County,
New York, aged more than one hundred years, some time after 1824.
Lieutenant Moses Cleaveland, son of Moses and Mary (Clarke)
Cleaveland, was born May 23, 1745, either at Norwich, or Wethers-
field, Connecticut. He lived at the former place and also at New
London, later removing to Morrisville, New York. In the Revolu-
tion he was a Lieutenant of Cavalry, and was stationed at Roxbury,
[189]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
Massachusetts, at the time of the siege of Boston, when he acted as
a scout. His wife Phoebe, daughter of Aaron and Sarah Fargo, was
born February 14, 1747, at Norwich, where they were married
February 20, 1766. Moses Cleaveland died at Morrisville, Madison
County, New York, in 1817.
General Erastus Cleaveland, son of Lieutenant Moses and
Phoebe (Fargo) Cleaveland, was born June 20, 1771, at Norwich,
Connecticut. He lived at Madison, New York, to which place he
removed in 1793, and which he represented in the Legislature in 1806
and 1808. He was made a Major in 1807, and, in the War of 1812,
was Colonel, in command of a Regiment at Sacketts Harbor. He
was Lieutenant-Colonel in 1812, Colonel in 1814, and later was made
Brigadier-General of Militia. He married Rebecca Berry, sister of
Samuel Berry, who bought the land where Madison, New York, was
built for twenty-five dollars. General Cleaveland and his wife were
married at Southwick, Massachusetts, on January 8, 1795. He died
at Madison, New York, on January 27, 1867, at the age of eighty-five.
Jeannette, the daughter of General Erastus and Rebecca (Berry)
Cleaveland, was born January 26, 1817, at Madison, and there she
married on April 20, 1831, Hamilton Putnam, whose career has been
described above. She died at Middleboro, Massachusetts, while on a
visit to their daughter, Mrs. Grant, July 31, 1884.
Erastus Gaylord Putnam, son of Hamilton and Jeannette
(Cleaveland) Putnam, received his education at Cortiand Academy,
at Cortland, New York, and, after leaving school, taught for some
years until attaining his majority. When he was twenty-one years
of age he went to Cleveland, Ohio, where he entered the wholesale
drug-house of his uncle, Erastus Gaylord, and studied medicine for
five years under the tuition of an English chemist. At the outbreak
of the Civil War, he served on the Sanitary Commission of Ohio, and
was offered the appointment as Assistant Surgeon, which, however,
he was obliged to decline on account of ill-health. On his return to
New York, Mr. Putnam held the position of business manager of
Cornell University from 1868 to 1871, residing at Ithaca for those
years. In 1872 he removed to Elizabeth, New Jersey, where he was
the proprietor of the Library Hall Drugstore until 1887. For ten
years, from 1877, he was a member of the Board of Education in
Elizabeth, and was its President for some years. It was due to his
efforts that the Elizabeth High School was established He was
Health Officer of the city from May, 1888, until 1898, during which
[190]
A STUDY IN PUTNAM AND CLEAVELAND ANCESTRY
time he fought against an epidemic of small-pox, showing great ability
and devotion in his profession. His whole life was given up to
alleviating the lives of his fellow-citizens, and his memory is honored
by all those who knew of his unselfish labors. Mr. Putnam was a
member of the Sons of the American Revolution, being one of the
charter members of the Elizabeth Chapter. He married, at
" Keewaydin," Orange County, New York, January 30, 1867, Mary
Nicoll Woodward, born October 1, 1834, daughter of William A. and
Frances M. (Evertson) Woodward, and a descendant of many
ancient lines, both of English and Dutch blood. Their children, who
died in infancy, were: Mary Evertson, born December 27, 1867;
Rosalie Gaylord and Harry Barrow, born April 7, 1871 ; and William
Hamilton, born November 4, 1875.
Doctor Elijah Putnam, the paternal grandfather of Erastus
Gaylord Putnam, resided in Madison, New York, where he practised
medicine for forty years, and was an organizer of the Madison
County Medical Society. He was born in Medford, Massachusetts,
in 1769, and died in January, 1851. His wife was Phoebe, daughter
of Captain Abner Wood.
The father of Doctor Elijah Putnam was Eleazer Putnam, of
Medford, born in Danvers, Massachusetts, June 5, 1738. Danvers
was originally old Salem Village, and here the Putnam family lived
as far back as the first American ancestor. Eleazer Putnam married
Mary Crosby, of Billerica, Massachusetts, their marriage being pub-
lished in Charlestown, March 20, 1761. He died about 1806, in which
year, on March 14, administration on his estate was granted. In the
administration papers he is called " Eleazer Putnam of Medford,
yeoman." On the alarm of the 19th of April, 1775, before the Battle
of Lexington, Eleazer Putnam was in Captain Isaac Hull's Company,
from Medford, and on the roll is credited with five days' service.
His children are given as follows: Samuel, unmarried, according to
family tradition, who was recorded in 1806; John; Henry; Elijah,
born in 1769, whose biography has been given, as ancester in the
lineage traced; Hannah, who married Eben Thompson; and Rhoda,
who married Locke.
The father of Eleazer Putnam of Medford was Henry Putnam,
who was born in Salem Village on August 14, 1712. His wife was
named Hannah. It is related that, on a journey from Medford to
Connecticut, he stayed over night at Bolton, where he fell in love with
the daughter of his host, proposed in the morning, was married the
[191]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
same day and returned to his home with his bride and her dowry,
which, consisting of two cows and twelve sheep, he drove before him.
He was in command of a company at the capture of Louisburg, and
his son, Henry, was also there. Henry Putnam, Sr., removed from
Salem Village, while his son, Eleazer, whose biography has been given,
the ancestor of Erastus Gaylord Putnam, remained there. In 1738
Henry Putnam, with his brother, Samuel, and their mother, made a
deed of land in Salem Village to Benjamin and Joseph Knight.
About 1745 he sold the old homestead of his father in the Village to
Phineas Putnam. He stilled owned property there, however, as in
1752 his name appears on the tax list, and he was one of the three
tellers at the town meeting of that year, on March 4, to collect and
count the votes for selectmen. He was chosen surveyor of lumber
there at the same meeting. About this time he probably removed to
Charlestown, as the name does not appear on the tax list of Danvers
again until 1757, when it is probably that of his son, Henry. Henry
Putnam, Sr., was taxed in Charlestown from 1756 to 1765 for land
purchased there in 1753. He taught school " without the neck,"
when he was styled " gentleman," and " from Danvers." He was
appointed May 9, 1763, administrator on the estate of his son, John
Putnam, " late of Charlestown," and is called " Gentleman," " of
Charlestown." He probably removed to Medford soon after.
On the Alarm of April 19, 1775, before the Battle of Lexington,
Henry Putnam was one of those patriots who responded to the call.
He may have gone from Medford, or perhaps joined the Minute Men
who marched from Danvers to Cambridge, more than sixteen miles in
four hours, taking their stand in a small walled enclosure, forming
a breastwork of shingles, and waited for the retreating British. It
was at West Cambridge that the greatest loss was sustained by the
Americans. Of the Danvers Company was his son, Henry Putnam,
Jr., who was wounded, but later was in the Battle of Bunker Hill.
Other near relatives were among the wounded and killed. His son,
Eleazer, marched with the men from Medford, as before stated. In
the Battle of Lexington Henry Putnam was killed, giving up his life
for his country at the age of sixty-three. Five of his sons took part
in the battle.
General Israel Putnam was of the same generation as Henry
Putnam, whose biography has just been given, their fathers being
first cousins. The General was born in Salem Village on January 7,
1717-18, in a house near what is now Hathorne Station, where the
[192]
A STUDY IN PUTNAM AND CLEAVELAND ANCESTRY
first American ancestor of Nathaniel Hawthorne was born. The
latter added a " w " to his surname. His emigrant ancestor, Major
William Hathorne of Salem Village, was father t>f Judge John
Hathorne, who is tragically memorable as one of the condemnors of
the unfortunate men and women who were executed in the dreadful
witchcraft delusion at Salem Village in 1692. The Hathornes were
allied by marriage with the Putnams.
General Putnam is described by his grandson, Judge Judah Dana,
as follows : " For height, about . . . middle size, very erect, thick-
set, muscular, and firm in every part. His countenance was open,
strong and animated ... all exactly fitted for a warrior." He
fought in the French and Indian War at the age of thirty-nine, having
already had two years of warfare as one of the Rogers' Rangers in
the vicinity of Ticonderoga and Crown Point. He received the rank
of Captain, and in 1758 was made a Major, and marched with the
forces of Lord Howe to Ticonderoga, which met disaster. A month
later he was captured by the Indians near Fort Edward and tied to a
tree to be burned to death. One of the savages informed the French
leader of their company, who saved his life. He was then taken to
Canada as a prisoner, but finally exchanged through a fellow
prisoner, who said that he was an "old man" who wished to be at home
with his family. He again joined the forces and took part in the
capture of Crown Point and Ticonderoga, when Canada became an
English possession.
On April 2.0, 1775, while ploughing at his home at Pomfret, Con-
necticut, where he had removed, he heard of the Battle of Lexington
of the day before, and, dropping his plough, without change of dress,
mounted a horse and rode to Lebanon, where the Governor ordered
him to Boston. Returning home he found hundreds of men waiting
to join his command, and, riding through the night for eighteen
hours, he reached Concord, and before a week had passed was placed
in command of the minute men and volunteers as Brigadier-General.
For the remainder of the year 1775 his headquarters were at Cam-
bridge, on the site of what is now the City Hall.
At the Battle of Bunker Hill, on June 17, 1775, Israel Putnam
became the very spirit of fiery patriotism which is balked by nothing.
His famous order to his men not to fire " until you see the whites of
their eyes," is well known. " At times he personally directs the dis-
charge of cannon. When impatient men fired without orders he
draws his sword and threatens death." When the Americans were
[193]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
threatened with disorganization, he resorted to actual violence, keep-
ing up their " morale " by his own determination. Long after the
Revolution had given to the world its first true Republic, Israel
Putnam was rebuked by some of those who, as at all periods, see
events in the petty scale by which their own minds are governed, for
his profanity during the Battle of Bunker Hill, to which he replied
with an apology, accompanied with the words, " It was enough to
make an angel swear to see the cowards run."
He is described by Doctor Thacher, in his " Military Journal,"
as follows : " In person he is corpulent and clumsy but carried a bold,
undaunted front. He exhibits . . . much of the character of the
veteran soldier. He visited our hospital and inquired with much
solicitude into the condition of our patients."
Israel Putnam died on May 29, 1790. His epitaph, by Timothy
Dwight, who five years later became President of Yale College, is
here given :
" To a Man whose Generosity was Singular, whose Honesty was
Proverbial, Who Raised Himself to Universal Esteem and Offices
of Eminent Distinction by Personal Worth and a Useful Life."
Henry Putnam, the cousin of General Israel Putnam, and an
account of whom, as ancestor of Erastus Gaylord Putnam, has above
been given, had the following children: Henry, born in 1737, and
baptized in the old Salem Village Meeting House, December 2, 1753;
Eleazer, born June 5, and baptized August 13, 1738, whose biography
has been given; Elijah, born July 23, and baptized July 26, 1741;
probably the Elijah Putnam who graduated at Harvard College in
1766; Roger, born October 10, and baptized the 16th, in 1743; John,
born October 11, baptized the 13th, 1745, administration on whose
estate was granted to his father, with Caleb Brooks and Thomas Reed
as bondsmen, on May 9, 1763; Billings, born May 11, 1749; and
Benjamin, born August 26, and baptized at Salem Village September
15, 1751, who died at Savannah, Georgia, in 1801.
Henry Putnam, whose biography has just been given, was the
son of Eleazer Putnam, born in Salem Village in 1665. His first
wife was Hannah, daughter of Daniel and Hannah (Hutchinson)
Boardman. She was born in Ipswich, February 18, 1670-1. He
married, second, November 14, 1711, Elizabeth, daughter of Benja-
min and Apphia (Hale) Rolfe of Newbury, born there December 15,
1679. Elizabeth (Rolfe) Putnam died January 2, 1752. She was a
sister of Abigail, wife of Nathaniel Boardman, brother of the first
[194]
A STUDY IN PUTNAM AND CLEAVELAND ANCESTRY
wife of Eleazer Putnam. In family papers, Henry Putnam, born in
1712, whose biography has been given, the eldest child of Eleazer
Putnam, wrote of his parents :
" On Jany the 25 th 173 2/3 Eleazer Putnam Departed this Leife
about 16 minutes after 3 O :-: the clock in the afternoon in ye 65 year
of his age.
" Mother Died Jany 2 nd 1752 between 7 & 8 in ye morn "
In the same record he writes of four of his brothers and sisters :
" The age of Hannah is 50 in 1749.
' The age of Eleazer is 54.
' The age of Jeptha is 30.
' The age of Samuel is 42."
Eleazer Putnam wis in the company of Captain William Ray-
mond in the expedition to Canada in 1690. He was prominent in the
affairs of Salem Village, where he lived. With his first wife, he
was admitted to the church there in 1699, and, in 1717-18 was made a
deacon. He was " tythingman " in 1700 and in 1705; constable in
1708, and surveyor of highways on the Topsfield road in 1711. His
farm was near the Topsfield boundary and north of the General
Israel Putnam house, on the present site of the preston place.
Eleazer Putnam lived in troublous times at Salem. The terrible
witchcraft delusion occurred there in 1692, and soon involved persons
of the highest character, who were accused by a group of hysterical
girls, lead by an old Indian woman, of bewitching them. The
superstition, which at that period existed in all parts of the civilized
world, was encouraged by some of the ministers and persons in
authority, and many innocent persons were executed. One of the
girls was Ann Putnam, daughter of Sergeant Thomas Putnam (a
first cousin of Eleazer Putnam of the present biography). She was
twelve years of age at the time. When she was nineteen her parents
died and she soon became an invalid. Her conscience was troubled
by the false testimony she had given during the trials of those accused,
and, on her admission as a member to the church at Salem, under the
guidance of Reverend Joseph Green, she made public confession as
follows :
" I desire to be humbled before God for that sad . . . provi-
dence that befell my father's family . . . about '92, that I ...
being in childhood, should ... be made an instrument for the
accusing of several persons of a grievous crime, whereby their lives
were taken away from them, whom now I have good reason to
[195]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
believe . . . were innocent persons; and that it was a great
delusion of Satan that deceived me ... whereby I ... fear I
have been instrumental, with others, though unwittingly, to bring
upon myself and this land the guilt of innocent blood; though I can
truly say, before God ... I did it not out of anger, malice or ill-
will . . . but . . . ignorantly . . . particularly ... I was
a chief instrument of accusing Goodwife Nurse and her two sisters.
I desire to lie in the dust, and to be humbled for it ... and
earnestly beg forgiveness of God, and from all those unto whom I
have given just cause of sorrow and offense, whose relatives were
taken away or accused."
Several members of the Putnam family did not join with those
who so unjustly accused others of dealings with Satan, among them
Joseph Putnam, father of General Israel Putnam, who, with others
of the family, one of whom was Captain John Putnam, father of
Eleazer of the present biography, signed a document certifying to the
good character of the unfortunate Mrs. Rebecca Nurse, one of those
executed. It is here given: "We whose names are hereunto sub-
scribed, being desired by Goodman Nurse to declare what we know
concerning his wife's conversation for time past, we can testify
. . . that we have known her for many years, and according to our
observation, her life and conversation were according to her pro-
fession, and we never had any cause or grounds to suspect her of any
such thing as she is now accused of." This document was signed,
among others, by Israel Porter, Elizabeth Porter, John Putnam,
Rebecca Putnam, Benjamin Putnam, Sarah Putnam, another Sarah
Putnam, Jonathan Putnam, and Joseph Putnam. The Elizabeth
Porter who signed was a sister of Judge John Hathorne, the examin-
ing magistrate in the trials of the " witches," and was mother-in-law
of Joseph Putnam. She was " among the very few who condemned
the proceedings from the first." " This venerable lady, whose con-
versation and bearing were so truly saint-like, was an invalid of
extremely delicate condition and appearance, of piety and simplicity
of heart. In all probability she shared in the popular belief on the
subject of witchcraft and supposed the sufferings of the children
were real and they were afflicted by an ' evil hand.' At the very
time she was sorrowfully sympathizing with them . . . they were
inculcating suspicions against her, and maturing plans for her
destruction."
At the trial of some of those accused, Eleazer Putnam is said to
[196]
A STUDY IN PUTNAM AND CLEAVELAND ANCESTRY
have " drawn his rapier " and thrust at the supposed invisible devil
or witch who was at the time torturing the " afflicted " girls.
He died January 25, 1732-3, at Salem Village. His will was
dated October 3, 1732, and probated April 9, 1733. In it he men-
tioned his wife, Elizabeth; his daughter, Hannah Peabody and her
children; his sons, Eleazer and Jeptha, and his daughter Apphia.
His sons, Samuel and Henry, were the executors. An inventory of
his estate was returned on January 22, 1733-4.
By his first wife, Hannah (Boardman) Putnam, he had the
following children: Hannah, born December 8, 1693; baptized at
Topsfield, December 16, 1694; married Doctor Nathan Peabody;
Eleazer, born September 8, 1695; baptized at Topsfield, August 9,
1696; Sarah, born September 26, 1697; Jeptha, born August 24, 1699,
and baptized August 25, 1700, at Salem Village; Joseph and Samuel,
born May 30 and baptized June 15, 1707.
By his second wife, Elizabeth (Rolfe) Putnam, he had: Henry,
born August 14, 1712; baptized at Salem Village August 17, the same
year, whose biography has been given; and Apphia, born July 8, 1716,
who married, first, John, son of Benjamin and Hannah (Endicott)
Porter, and second, Asa, son of Thomas and Sarah (Osgood) Perley.
Eleazer Putnam was the son of Captain John Putnam of Salem
Village, who was baptized at Aston Abbotts, Buckinghamshire, Eng-
land, May 27, 1627, and came with his parents to America. His wife
was Rebecca Prince, called " step-daughter of John Gedney." She
was, perhaps, the sister of Robert Prince, who lived nearby in Salem.
They were married there September 3, 1652. Robert Prince of
Salem, who had a grant of land there in 1649, is thought to have been
a brother of Richard Prince, who came to Salem in 1639, and was
made a freeman December 27, 1642.
John Putnam was made a freeman in 1665. In 1668 and 1670,
with his brothers, he signed petitions for a minister at " the farms."
He also signed, with other members of the family, a petition to
separate the " Village " from Salem, dated March 14, 1681-2. Those
signing it were as follows :
' Thomas Putnam senior Jonathan Putnam
" John Putnam Thomas Putnam jr.
" Nathaniel Putnam Edward Putnam."
' John Putnam jr.
He was one of those members of the Salem church who, on
[197]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
November 10, 1689, formed the church at Salem Village, now the
North Parish in Danvers. The members of the Putnam family
among them were:
" John Putnam and wife John Putnam jr. and wife
Benjamin Putnam and wife
' Thomas Putnam
Jonathan Putnam and wife
" Edward Putnam
Sarah Putnam wife of James."
The Putnams were allied by marriage with the Endicott family.
Apphia, daughter of Eleazer, Captain John Putnam's son, as has
been stated, married John, a son of Benjamin and Hannah (Endicott)
Porter. Captain John Putnam, of the present biography, in 1678
testified that he was intimately acquainted with Governor Endicott,
having, fifty years before that date, been employed on the latter's
farm, which was noted as one of the finest in the colony.
In the year 1658 John Putnam deeded twenty acres of meadow
land on Ipswich River to Robert Prince, styling himself " Planter."
With Simon Bradstreet and Daniel Dennison, in 1674, he established
large iron works at Rowley Village, now Boxford, which were con-
structed and carried on by Samuel and Nathan Leonard. Some
years before his death he deeded all his property to his children.
John Putnam was prominent in the military and civic affairs of
Salem. He was made a Corporal in 1672; was in the Narragansett
War, and was Lieutenant of a troop of horse at the Village in 1678.
He is called " Captain " after 1687. He was a Deputy to the General
Court in 1679, to succeed Bartholomew Gedney, and also in 1680-
1686 and 1691-1692. On January 24, 1677, he was " ordered and
empowered to take care of the law relating to the catechissing of
children and youth be duly attended to all the Village," and is desired
to have " a diligent care that all the families do carefully and con-
stantly attend the due education of children and youth according to
law." He took a leading part in the dispute regarding the boundary
between Salem and Topsfield. With two of his sons, he owned
property in the contested territory, and tenaciously held to his rights
in the matter. It was finally settled by the creation of another town-
ship called Middleton. As late as 1706, with his son, Captain
Jonathan Putnam, he was empowered to settle town boundaries.
Captain John Putnam's farm was the same on which his father
[198]
A STUDY IN PUTNAM AND CLEAVELAND ANCESTRY
had lived, now known as " Oak Knoll," the home of the poet,
Whittier. He died in 1710. The following record of his burial is
from the diary of Reverend Joseph Green : " April 7 Captain Put-
nam buried by ye soldiers." His grave is in what is now the Wads-
worth Cemetery, formerly the old Putnam burying ground, and is
unmarked. The oldest stone bears date of 1682, and marks the grave
of the wife of his son, Jonathan.
Captain John Putnam's children, born at Salem Village, were:
Rebecca, born May 28, 1653, married John Fuller; Sarah, born
September 4, 1654, married John Hutchinson; Priscilla, born March
4, 1657, married Joseph Bailey; Jonathan, born March 17, 1659;
James, born September 4, 1661 ; Hannah, born February 2, 1663,
married Henry Brown; Eleazer, born 1665, whose biography has
been given; John, born July 14, 1667; Susannah, born September 4,
1670, married Edward Bishop; and Ruth, born in August, 1673.
Captain John Putnam was the youngest child of his father, John
Putnam, who emigrated with his family to America. He was born
at Wingrave, Buckinghamshire, England, where he was baptized on
January 17, 1579-80, and was the son of Nicholas and Margaret
(Goodspeed) Putnam. His marriage probably took place in 1611
or 1612. The marriage records for this period are missing from the
register at Wingrave, and the maiden surname name of his wife is not
known. But Priscilla, wife of John Putnam, was admitted as a
member of the church at Salem, Massachusetts, January 21, 1641,
and it is believed that she was Priscilla Deacon, a member of the
Deacon family of Corner Hall, in Hemel Hempstead, Hertford-
shire. This family was descended from Richard Deacon of Wyn-
druge, Herts, who died in 1496. Its Coat-Armor is blazoned: " A
chevron treillisse between three roses. Crest: A demi-eagle." The
brother of this Richard Deacon was Michael, Bishop of St. Asaph,
and one of his sons was Secretary to Elizabeth of York, the Queen
of Henry VII, and daughter of Edward IV.
In 1658 Zaccheus Gould of Topsfield, Massachusetts, deputed
" John Putnam of Salem, the younger, his cousin," to be his attorney.
An account book belonging to John Gould, grandson of this Zaccheus,
has the following entry : " Grandfather Gould lived in Buckingham-
shire, and Grandfather Deacon in Hertfordsshire, in Hempstead
town in Corner Hall." In the same book there is mentioned John
Putnam, who is called " cousin." A brother of Zaccheus Gould,
Jeremy, married Priscilla Grover, and lived in Aston Abbotts in 1631.
[199]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
He was in Rhode Island in 1638. John Gould, another brother of
Zaccheus Gould, had a daughter, Priscilla, who married a Grover,
and had a daughter, Priscilla, and also had a niece, Priscilla Ware.
Neither, from the dates, could have been the wife of John Putnam.
The word " cousin " in the Seventeenth Century often was used for
" nephew." It may be that Zaccheus Gould and John Putnam mar-
ried sisters. They both had daughters named Phoebe, and, accord-
ing to the records of the Gould family, Phoebe, wife of Zaccheus
Gould, was a daughter of Thomas and Martha Deacon of Corner
Hall. John Putnam's eldest son was named Thomas. The home of
the Goulds and the Deacons was in the part of Hempstead called
Bovington, and is eight miles from Tring, which is close by the
original home of the Putnam family in Hertfordshire. Nicholas
Putnam, father of John Putnam, the first, of Salem, Massachusetts,
had inherited from his brother, Richard, an estate in Wingrave,
bequeathed the latter by their father, John Putnam, who, at the time
of his death, in 1597, was living at Stewkley, where Richard Deacon,
the Queen's Secretary, above mentioned, held the two chief manors
in 1503.
Nicholas Putnam bequeathed property at Aston Abbotts, County
Buckingham, to his son, John, consisting of houses and lands, and it
was there that the latter's children were baptized and undoubtedly
born. In 1614 John Putnam was one of the sureties on his mother's
second marriage at Aston Abbotts. The only other mentions of him
in the English records are at the baptisms of his children at Aston
Abbotts, in 1612, when his eldest child, Elizabeth, was baptized, and
on dates after that year, as late as 1627, when his youngest child,
John, was baptized.
The date of his emigration to America is not known. He first
appears in Salem in 1640. It is thought that his son, Thomas, who
first settled in Lynn, Massachusetts, came to America before his
father. His son, Nathaniel, made a deposition in the year 1685-6
that he had lived in Salem for forty-six years, and, at the same time,
his brother, John Putnam, Junior, stated that he had lived there about
forty-five years. There is a tradition in the family that John Put-
nam came to this country in 1634, but no record has been found which
authenticates it. It probably was first stated in an account of the
family given by Edward Putnam in 1733. John Putnam and his
sons received land grants in Salem, the earliest recorded, on which he
built his home, being as follows:
[200]
A STUDY IN PUTNAM AND CLEAVELAND ANCESTRY
" At a meeting the 20th of the llth month (1640), there being
present, Mr. Endicott, Mr. Hathorne, John Woodbury, Jeffry Massy,
the selectmen, there was ' Graunted to John Putnam one hundred acres
of land at the head of Mr. Skelton's Farme between it and Elias
Stileman the elder his Farme, if there be an hundred acres of it. And
it is in exchange of one hundred acres w ch was graunted to the said
John Putnam formerly & if it fall out that there be not such there
then to be made up neere Lieutenant Davenport's hill, to be layd out
by the towne. And tenne acres of meadow in the meadow called the
pine meadow if it be not there formerly graunted to others/ '
Also, at a meeting of the selectmen on March 17, 1652, it was
resolved that " There being formerlie graunted unto John Putnam
Sen' 50 acres of land and complaint being made that the said land laid
out to him is not soe much it is ordered that the layers out of the land
shall make up what the said land shall want of his grant in land lying
between his sonne Nathanaells land and Richard Huchisson."
At a meeting of the selectmen on December 26, 1654-5, another
grant was made to his son, John, as follows :
" Granted to John Putnam Jun' 30 acres of upland neare
adioyning to the Farmes of Captayne Hathorne John Rucke and
William Nicols, being in exchange of the 30 acres he should have had
at the end of Captaine Hathorne his Farme." On the same day it
was " Ordered that whereas there is a small portion of rockie land
adioyning unto the farm latelie in the possession of Captaine
Hathorne but now possest by John Putnam Sen' Richard Huchisson
Daniell Ray and John Hathorne upon the request of the said parties
the said Rockie land is graunted unto them upon consideration of the
summe of twentie shillings."
In 1653 John Putnam divided his lands at Salem between his
sons, Thomas and Nathaniel. He had already given his homestead
there to his youngest son, John.
In the account of the family, already mentioned, compiled by
Deacon Edward Putnam in 1733, the death of John Putnam, Senior,
is thus described : " He ate his supper, went to prayer with his
family and died before he went to sleep."
The children of John and Priscilla Putnam, who came with their
parents to America, were baptized at Aston Abbotts, Buckingham-
shire, and were: Elizabeth, baptized December 20, 1612; Thomas,
baptized March 7, 1614-15, died at Salem Village, May 5, 1686;
John, baptized July 24, 1617, died young, and was buried at Aston
[201]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
Abbotts, November 5, 1620; Nathaniel, baptized October 11, 1619,
died at Salem Village, July 23, 1700; Sarah, baptized March 7,
1622-3; Phoebe, baptized July 28, 1624; and John, baptized May 27,
1627, whose biography has been given.
With the generation before John Putnam, the elder, of Salem,
Massachusetts, the ancestral line of the American family of Putnam
passes into English scenes. His father was, as has been stated,
Nicholas Putnam of Wingrave, Buckinghamshire, who was born
about 1540. His wife was Margaret, daughter of John and Eliza-
beth Goodspeed of Wingrave, where she was baptized August 16,
1556. They were married at Wingrave on January 30, 1577. As
early as 1585 Nicholas Putnam removed from Wingrave to Stewke-
ley, where he inherited property from his father and brothers. He
made his will on January 1, 1597, and it was proved September 27,
1 598. It is here given :
" In the name of God Amen the first daye of Januarie Anno Dm
1597. I Nicholas Putnam of Stukely being sicke in bodie but of a
whole mind Pfict memorrie thank be to god doe dedeyn and make
this my last will and testament in maner and forme followinge, first I
bequeath my Soule to Almighti god my bodie to be buried in
Christianmenes buriall.
" It. I will that yf my wife and my sonne cannot agree to dwell
together that then my sonne John shall paye unto my wife V 11 * a
yeare as long as she liveth yf she keepe her widdowe, yf she marrye
then my sonne to paye her V lb a year soe iij yeares after her marriage
and no longer. It. I geve unto my iiij children Thomas, Richard,
Anne, and Elizabeth to everi one of them X lb to be payd them by my
wife and my sonne John when they come to the age of xxi yeares. It
I make my wife and Sonne John my executors jointley together to
Receive my debtes. Their hearing witness Wm. Meade, Bennet
Conley and John Meade w th others Prov. xxij Sept. 1598. (Arch.
Bucks.)"
The wife of Nicholas Putnam married, second, William Huxley,
of Aston Abbotts, on December 8, 1614. They were married at
Aston Abbotts, where she died four years later, and was buried.
The surety on her marriage was her son, John Putnam of Aston
Abbotts, called " husbandman."
The children of Nicholas Putnam by his wife, Margaret
(Goodspeed) Putnam, were: Anne, baptized October 12, 1578, mar-
ried at Aston Abbotts, January 26, 1604-5, William Argett; John,
[202]
A STUDY IN PUTNAM AND CLEAVELAND ANCESTRY
baptized January 17, 1579, emigrated to America and settled in
Salem, Massachusetts, his biography having been given above ; Eliza-
beth, baptized February 11, 1581, married at Aston Abbotts, October
22, 1612, Edward Bottome; Thomas, baptized September 20, 1584;
and Richard, of whose baptism no record has been found; living in
1597.
Nicholas Putnam, whose biography is given above, was the son
of John Putnam of Rowsham, in Wingrave, County Buckingham.
Wingrave is situated between Aston Abbotts and Long Marston and
Puttenham, the ancient seat of the Putnam family. The church
there, where John Putnam, who came with his family to Massachu-
setts, was baptized on January 17, 1579-80, was restored to much of
its original beauty early in the Twentieth Century, the old windows
opened, and ancient sculptures and paintings brought to light. Win-
grave was the home of the Goodspeeds, of which family the mother
of John Putnam, the emigrant, was a member. The name of the wife
of John Putnam of Rowsham is not known, but it is probable that she
was the Margaret Putnam who was buried at Wingrave January 27,
1568. He was buried there October 2, 1573. His will was dated
September 19, and proved November 14, in that year. In it he directs
that he be buried in the church at Wingrave, or in the churchyard. He
gives to his son, Nicholas (father of John Putnam of Aston Abbotts
and Salem, Massachusetts), 30; " two of the best " sheep; and other
legacies.
His children were: Nicholas, probably born between 1540 and
1550, whose biography has been given; Richard, to whom his father
bequeathed the house and land at Wingrave, lands " in the fields "
at Rowsham and Wingrave, and twenty nobles, who died without
issue and was buried at Wingrave, June 24, 1576, in his will, dated
June 21, and proved October 17, that year, giving his house at Win-
grave and his " free lands and leaseholds " to his brother Nicholas
Putnam ; Thomas, of Rowsham, died without issue and was buried at
Wingrave, July 2, 1576, who married Agnes Britnell, his will, dated
June 26, proved July 7, 1576, mentioning brothers, John and Nicholas;
Margaret, married at Wingrave, June 14, 1573, Godfrey Johnson;
and John, of Slapton, had land at Eddlesborough, his will, dated
March 5, 1594, and proved February 28, 1595-6, making his brother,
Nicholas Putnam, and Richard Sawell overseers, and his wife,
Margaret, and son, Thomas, executors.
John Putnam of Rowsham, above, was the son of Richard Put-
[203]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
nam of Eddlesborough and Woughton. The first-mentioned place
joins Slapton on the west, Woughton is about twelve miles north from
Eddlesborough, and Wingrave is above the same distance from
Woughton. The farm to which Richard Putnam removed from
Eddlesborough was situated in Woughton opposite the present
rectory. The name of Putnam has long disappeared from the
locality, and the family, once so numerous in this part of England,
has almost entirely transferred its home to New England. Richard
Putnam is mentioned in the Lay Subsidy Roll of 1524 (the sixteenth
year of the reign of Henry VIII), when he is called " of Edlesbury."
In the rolls for the 14th and 15th Henry VIII, he is styled " Rychard
Puttynhn." In the same roll John " Pottman " of Slapton is assessed
four shillings.
The will of Richard Putnam is on record at Somerset House,
London, and is dated December 12, 1556, and proved February 26,
1556-7. In it his surname is spelled " Puthnam," and he is called
" of Woughton on the Grene." To his wife, Joan, he leaves his house
at Slapton, with remainder to his son, John, and bequeathes property
in Woughton to his son, Harry, whom he makes executor. The over-
seers were his son, John Putnam, and " Rychard Brynklowe." It is
witnessed by John Chadde, Laurence Wylson, and others.
The children of Richard Putnam of Woughton were: John, of
Wingrave, eldest son, who was the ancestor of the Massachusetts
family, and whose biography has been given; Harry, of Woughton,
whose will was dated July 13, 1579, proved October 3, the same year,
and who had sons, Richard of Woughton, and Harry of Wolnerton ;
and Jene, married before 1556.
Richard Putnam, of Eddlesborough and Woughton, whose
biography appears above, was probably the son of Henry Putnam, a
younger son of Nicholas Puttenham, or Putnam, of Putnam Place,
in Penn, Buckinghamshire. He was living in 1526. His will has
not been found. He was probably also the father of John of Slapton
and Hawridge, and Thomas of Eddlesborough. The latter owned
Sewell, and, in 1628, with Matthew Puttenham, was among the
highest taxed inhabitants in Eddlesborough. This Matthew Putten-
ham, whose will was proved June 30, 1636, was of Hodenhall.
Thomas died in 1638, one-third part of the Manor of Northall, alias
Cowdwell, passing to his son, Gabriel, in 1640.
Nicholas Puttenham, or Putnam, as his surname frequently
appeared, the father of Henry Putnam, above, was probably born
[204]
A STUDY IN PUTNAM AND CLEAVELAND ANCESTRY
about 1460. He possessed Putnam Place in Penn, County Bucking-
ham, now a farmhouse, which probably was first held by the family
in 1315, and remained in possession of the Putnams until almost 1600.
In the Visitation of Buckinghamshire, made in 1634, a pedigree
of " Putnam of Penne " is given, taken from the Visitation of 1566.
It commences with " Nicholas Puttnam of Penne Bucks gent," and
names, as his " eldest son and heir," " John Putnam of Penne." His
son, Henry, probably father of Richard Putnam of Eddlesborough
and Woughton, does not appear in the pedigree, but the will of his
eldest son, John, above, dated 1526, names his brother, Henry, and
also Sir George Puttenham, his father's elder brother. Nicholas
Puttenham's sons were, therefore: John, of Penn, called "eldest
son and heir " in the Visitation of 1566; and Henry, living in -1526.
The Arms of Putnam of Penn, as given in the above-quoted
pedigree, are: "1. S. crusily fitchee (a) bird A.; a. Lozengy O. and
B. Crest : Wolves head erased G." Burke's General Armory gives
the Arms of " Puttenham, or Putnam (Bedfordshire, and Penn, co.
Buckingham). Sa. crusily fitchee ar. a stork of the last. Crest
A wolf's head gu." The same authority (Burke's General Armory),
gives the Coat-Armor of the elder branch of the family, " Puttenham
of Sherfield, co. Hants" (Visitation of 1634), as borne by Richard
Puttenham of Sherfield, Esq., grandson of Sir George Puttenham
of Sherfield, and whose only daughter and heiress, Anne, was the
wife of Francis Morris of Copwell, as "Ar. crusily fitchee sa, a stork
of the last. Crest, as the last." The above Sir George Puttenham
was knighted at the marriage of Prince Arthur, November 17, 1501,
at which time his Arms are blazoned : " Quarterly, 1 and 4, Sable,
crusily fitchee and a stork argent; 2 and 3, Lozengy, azure and or.
(For Warbleton), Crest: A hind's head gules."
John Putnam of Aston Abbotts, Buckinghamshire, and Salem,
Massachusetts, was the head of the eldest branch of the family at the
time of his emigration to America, as the elder line of Sherfield,
descending from Sir George Puttenham, became extinct in the male
line in the person of his grandson, Richard Puttenham, whose only
child was a daughter. The elder line of Penn was also extinct in the
male line, and the Putnams of Woughton, Hawridge, and Eddies-
borough were of younger branches than the family of Wingrave.
Nicholas Puttenham of Penn, County Buckingham, above, was
the third son of William Putenhatn, of Putenham, the ancient home of
the family in Hertfordshire, Penn, Sherfield, Warbleton, etc. He
[205]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
was born about 1430. His wife was Anne, daughter of John Hamp-
den, Esq., of Hampden, County Buckingham. She was of royal
descent, her pedigree being as follows :
The Emperor Charlemagne had a son,
Louis I, King of France; whose son was
Charles II, King of France; whose son was
Louis II, King of France; whose son was
Charles III, King of France; whose son was
Louis IV, King of France ; who son,
Charles, Duke of Lower Lorraine, had a daughter,
Gerberga (wife of Lambert de Mous), whose daughter,
Matilda (" Mahant de Louvaine"), married Eustace I, of Boulogne, and
had a son,
Eustace II of Boulogne, whose son,
Geoffrey de Boulogne (living in 1093), had a son,
William de Boulogne, whose son,
Pharamon de Boulogne de Tingry, had a daughter,
Sybilla, who married Ingebram de Fienes, and had a son,
William de Fienes of Mertock. whose daughter (name unknown) mar-
ried Bartholomew de Hampden, and had a son,
Sir Reginald de Hampden, whose son,
Sir Alexander de Hampden, had a son,
Sir Reginald de Hampden, who had a son,
Sir John de Hampden, whose son,
Sir Edmund de Hampden, whose son,
John Hampden, Esq., was father of
Anne Hampden, above, who became the wife of William Puttenham.
In 1490 William Puttenham was executor of the will of Gilbert
Stapleton, Vicar of Aston Abbotts. His own will, dated July 10,
1492, was proved July 23, the same year at Lambeth. To his
daughter, Agnes, he gives 5 yearly, to be taken from his manor of
Willeigh in Surrey. He mentions manors of Tannerigg in Surrey;
and Merston in Hertfordshire, and directs that he be buried before
the image of the Blessed Virgin in the chapel within the church of
the Hospital of the Blessed Mary, called the Elsingspytell, London.
He makes his son and heir, George Puttenham, Sir William Bowlond,
prior of the Hospital of the Blessed Mary of Elsingspytell, William
Tysted, Esq., and William Oldacres, chaplain, executors. William
Puttenham also held the manor of Lagham in Walkenstede, Surrey,
which was held by Richard Harecourt of him in 1486. In that year
John Whitehead held the manor of Estthrop of William Puttenham.
William Puttenham's children were: Sir George, son and heir;
Edmund, of Puttenham, died without male issue; Nicholas, of Penn,
A STUDY IN PUTNAM AND CLEAVELAND ANCESTRY
ancestor of John Putnam of Aston Abbotts, Buckinghamshire, and
Salem, Massachusetts; Frideswide; Elizabeth; Alionore, married
Richard Pigott, son of Richard Pigott, Esq., of Aston Rowant,
Oxfordshire ; Brigide ; and Agnes.
William Puttenham of Puttenham was the eldest son of Henry
Puttenham, who was born in the early part of the Fifteenth Century,
as he is stated to have been over sixty years of age in 1468. With
Edmund Brudenall, Robert Foster, and Thomas Lombard, he pur-
chased, in 1449-50, of Thomas Hand and Johan, his wife, a messuage
in Chalfhunt (Fines, 28 Henry VI), and, two years later, he, with
Thomas Everdon and Thomas de la Hay, purchased of Thomas More
and Florence, his wife, a messuage and land in Wycombe and
Huchenden (Fines, 30 Henry VI). He was named as one of the
executors of the will of William Whaplod of Chalfhunt St. Giles,
Bucks, November 14, 1447, and, with others, established a chantry
at Chalfhunt.
Henry Puttenham married Elizabeth, widow of Geoffrey Good-
luck. Her will, dated December 25, 1485, and proved October 9,
1486, is on record at Somerset House, London. She desires to be
buried in the chapel of Saint Mary the Virgin in All Saints of Istel-
worth, by the side of her first husband. To the high altar of Istel-
worth church she bequeaths her " red girdle silver-gift," and makes
many other bequests to church and religious institutions. She men-
tions her daughters, Maude (Matilda), wife of John Chase, and
Thomasine, wife. of Philip Payn. Her maiden surname was probably
Wylands, for in a suit concerning a claim on the manor of Maidstone
(6 Henry VII), the defendants are Matilda, wife of John Chase,
Thomasine, wife of Philip Payne, and Bridget, wife of Robert
Stowell, who are called daughters of " Elizabeth Wylands, wife of
Puttenham."
Henry Puttenham died July 6, 1473. He was the son of William
Puttenham, of Puttenham, Penn, etc., born about 1355, whose wife
was Margaret Warbleton. The Warbleton family held the manor of
Warbleton, Sussex, from which it took its name, and the manor of
Sherfield, Hampshire. The latter, in 1469, was possessed by the
Puttenhams. The earliest mention of the Warbleton family is in
the Inquisition Post Mortem on the death of William de Muncell,
August 13, 1243, in the 27th year of the reign of Henry III, at which
time the said William de Muncell held the manor of Compton of
of Thomas " de Warblington," which manor pertained to the manor
[207]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
of Sherfield, " which said Thomas holds of the king." William
Puttenham's wife, Margaret, was the third daughter of John
Warbleton of Warbleton and Sherfield, by Katherine, daughter of
Sir John de Foxle of Foxle, Bramshell, and Apuldrefield.
William Puttenham may have been the son of Robert Puttenham,
who was either a son or grandson of Sir Roger Puttenham, High
Sheriff of Hertfordshire in 1322. Or his father may have been a
son of Sir Roger Puttenham of Puttenham (1320-1380), grandson of
the Sheriff. In a pedigree in the Visitation of Hampshire, 1634, the
descent of Sir George Puttenham is given as from a Robert Putten-
ham. Robert Puttenham, of Puttenham, was a witness to a deed,
dated 1346, conveying the manor of Erie in Pittston, of which Putten-
ham was later one of the enfeof fees. It is at this point that a break
in the Putnam line of descent appears, the exact relationship of
William Puttenham of Puttenham and Penn and Sir Roger Putten-
ham and Robert Puttenham not being clear. It is certain that
William was of the family of Puttenham manor, as he held it, together
with Penn, Sherfield, Warbleton, etc.
Sir Roger Puttenham, above (1320-1380), may have been the
son of Henry Puttenham, of Puttenham, in Hertfordshire (1300-
1350). In a pedigree of the Harleian Society, from a Visitation of
Northamptonshire, Thomas Puttenham is stated to have married
Helen, daughter of John Spigornell, by whom he had a son, Roger,
and this Roger had a son, Henry Putterham. Thomas Puttenham of
Puttenham, in the reign of Edward I, was the father of the above-
mentioned Roger Puttenham, High Sheriff of Hertfordshire in 1322,
father of Henry Puttenham of Puttenham, above (1300-1350).
The line, therefore, continues back with Sir Roger Puttenham,
High Sheriff of Hertfordshire, 1322, father of the above Henry
Puttenham. The Sheriff held an important position in early times,
being frequently one of the most powerful persons of the County.
He acted as President of the County Court which nominated for
election the two Knights of the Shire who represented it in Parlia-
ment. At the period that Sir Roger Puttenham was Sheriff the dis-
turbances of the reign of Edward II were occurring, the Despensers
(father and son), friends of the king, having been forced into exile,
and soon after the king being deposed and murdered. Sir Roger
Puttenham died at about this time. His wife was Alina Spigornell,
who, after his death, became the wife of Thomas de la Hay. Sir
Roger was of age before 1315, when " Final Concord " was made " in
[208]
A STUDY IN PUTNAM AND CLEAVELAND ANCESTRY
the Octave of the Purification of the Blessed Virgin Mary " (8
Edward II), 1315, between "Roger de Puttenham and Aline his
wife," plaintiffs, by Robert de Cravell and Alice his wife, defendants,
concerning rent of thirteen shillings, four pence, in Penn. This is the
first mention of possessions of the Puttenham family in Penn. Sir
Roger Puttenham had a son, Roger, who was also Sheriff of Hert-
fordshire, and Knight of the Shire for Bucks in 1355, '58, '63, '66,
'67, and 70.
Sir Roger, the elder (Sheriff in 1322), was the son of Thomas
de Puttenham and his wife, Alina, or Helen, daughter of John
Spigornell, and probably the niece or sister of Sir Henry Spigornell,
the Chief Justice. Thomas de Puttenham's wife, called " the Lady
of Puttenham," held the manor of Fleet Merston, Bucks., for the king
in the year 1303. Robert de Puttenham, more than a century after-
ward, held part of a knight's fee in Merston, which " the Lady of
Puttenham had held of the Honor of Leicester."
Thomas de Puttenham may have been the son of John de Putten-
ham, who held the manor of Puttenham in 1291. In 1279 Elias de
Bekingham and John de Cobham were appointed " to take assize of
novel disseisin " by William de Lung of Puttenham vs. John, son of
William de Puttenham et ah, concerning a tenement in Puttenham.
In 1297 John, son of John "de Pottenham " appears in litigation con-
cerning another tenement in the same place, and eight years later,
with his wife, Agnes, purchases a messuage of Richard Payne and
Agnes, his wife, in Tykeford, near Newport Pagnel.
In the records of the King's Court, which commence in the reign
of Richard I, is recorded a suit, under date of 1199, by Gilbert de la
Hide against William de la Lane concerning land in Bareworth, in
which " Roger, son of Simon," Reginald de Portes, Alan de Sumeri,
and Simon de " Puteham " are appointed to choose twelve men as
jurors to decide the case. Among those chosen was Ralph de
" Pudeham." Sir Simon de Puttenham was probably lord of the
manor, and Ralph de Puttenham and " Roger son of Simon " may
have been his sons. Ralph de Puttenham held a knight's fee in
Puttenham, "of the Honor of Leicester," in 1210-1212, when an
inquisition of knights' fees in Essex and Hertfortshire was made.
In February, 1218, he purchased property in Stivecle, County Buck-
ingham. In the reign of Henry III, Simon de Montfort, Earl of
Leicester, held three parts of one knight's fee which was held by
Ralph de Puttenham in Puttenham. Ralph de Puttenham probably
[209]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
died before 1250. Sir Simon de Puttenham was undoubtedly
descended from Sir Roger de Puttenham, who was a tenant of the
manor of Puttenham, holding it of Odo, Bishop of Baieux, half-
brother of William the Conqueror on his mother's side. On Bishop
Odo's death, in 1099, his English estate were forfeited to the Crown.
The Manor of Puttenham appears in the Domesday Survey of
William the Conqueror, 1086, when inquiry was made concerning the
estates of the realm, as to those who held them at that time, their
extent, number of inhabitants, value, and their value in the time of
King Edward the Confessor. From this survey it appears that the
Manor, before the Norman Conquest, was possessed by Earl Leuium,
brother of King Harold. It was given by the Conqueror to the
latter's half-brother, Odo, Bishop of Baieux, as before stated, who
held it at the time of the Survey. In Domesday Book it is described
as follows: "The manor (of Puttenham) answers for four hides,
Roger holds it for the Bishop. There is land to four ploughs. There
is one in the demesne and another may be made. Four villanes with
two borders there have two ploughs. There are four cottagers and
two bondmen, and two mills of ten shillings and eight pence. Meadow
for four ploughs, and four shillings. Pasture for the cattle. It is
worth sixty shillings, when the Bishop received it forty shillings. In
King Edward's time four pounds."
Puttenham Manor was included in the great fief known as " the
Honor of Leicester," its lords paying fealty to the Earls of Leicester.
Puttenham Manor appears to have been held by the Plantagenet
royal family from the time of the first Plantagenet Earl of Leicester,
Edmund, younger son of Henry III, who was created Earl in 1264.
Saint Mary's Church at Puttenham was built about 1280 or 1290.
In later years it was defaced by sacreligious hands, some of its win-
dows closed, and its memorials broken. In 1851 the chancel was
rebuilt. The beautiful tower remains in its original form. The
roof of the nave is supported by eight carved figures, and between
them, against the wall, are smaller figures each holding a shield.
The Manor remained in possession of the Puttenham family of
the Sherfield branch until the middle of the Sixteenth Century, later
passing into the possession of the families of Skipworth, Saunders,
Duncombe, Lucy, Meacher, and Egerton. It was later purchased by
Baron Lionel Nathan de Rothschild.
Wingrave, in Buckinghamshire, where lived the parents of John
Putnam of Aston Abbotts, England, and Danvers (old Salem Vil-
[210]
A STUDY IN PUTNAM AND CLEAVELAND ANCESTRY
lage), Massachusetts, Nicholas and Margaret (Goodspeed) Putnam,
was a part of the possessions of the Beauchamp family, and later was
held by the Nevilles, of which family was " Warwick, the King-
Maker." In the Sixteenth Century it was held by the Hampdens.
The wife of the great-great-grandfather of John Putnam of Salem
(William Puttenham, of Puttenham Manor), was Anne, daughter
of John Hampden, Esq., of Hampden, County Buckingham, as before
stated, who was of royal descent. Wingrave later was owned by
the Dormer family, and is now possessed by Baron Rothschild.
The marriage of William Puttenham and Anne Hampden took place
in the latter half of the Fifteenth Century, as he was born in 1430,
and it is probable that the property at Wingrave came to the Putten-
hams through this marriage.
There is, besides Puttenham in Hertfordshire, the seat of the
family of the present sketch, from which it took its surname, Putten-
ham in Surrey, which perhaps also was once a possession of the same
family. It will be recalled that William Puttenham of Puttenham,
Hertfordshire, Penn, etc., father of Nicholas Puttenham of Putnam
Place in Penn, Buckinghamshire, also held manors in Surrey.
Puttenham in Hertfordshire is in the Vale of Aylesbury, on
whose eastern side the Chiltern Hills lie between the Shires of Hert-
ford and Bedford. Buckinghamshire is on the west, and the valley
lies in a northwesternly direction, through Hertfordshire and Bucks.
The ancient town of Tring, about thirty-four miles northwest of
London, has stood for centuries at the head of the pass. About four
miles away is the parish of Puttenham, and a few miles farther is
Wingrave. Following the road from Wingrave, a mile beyond its
intersection with the highway to Aylesbury, is the village of Aston
Abbotts, the home of John Putnam who came to Massachusetts.
Among the beautiful Chiltern Hills the life of the Puttenhams
had its earliest-known English origin. In the old Church of Saint
Mary, at Puttenham Manor, from the Thirteenth Century, they were
baptized, and later are found recorded in the registers of Wingrave
Church, in Buckinghamshire, nearby. Not far away, at Aston
Abbotts, the children of John Putnam, the first American ancestor,
were baptized, and from it the family was transplanted to America.
The name is now rare in the English localities where for so many
centuries it was known, and, in the few instances when it is found,
appears as " Putman," having lost its derivation from the ancient
Puttenham, retained in sound by the many Putnams in New England,
[211]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
and in other parts of our country. The virile strength of the race has
been preserved through the centuries and has been given, in no small
measure, to the founding and bulwarking of our Nation.
The following account of Captain Henry Putnam (whose biog-
raphy is given on pages 191 and 192 in the preceding article), and of
his heroic death in the War of the American Revolution, has been writ-
ten by Mrs. Erastus Gaylord Putnam.
Captain Henry Putnam, born at Salem August 14, and baptized
there August 17, 1712, was an officer in the French War and did good
service in the conquest of Canada by the English. A short sword or
sabre, surrendered to him by a French officer at the capture of Louis-
burg in 1745, descended into the hands of his great-grandson, Doctor
E. K. Thompson of Titusville, Pennsylvania.
At the breaking out of the Revolution, he was living with his
son, Eleazer, in West Cambridge, Massachusetts. The people were
afire with enthusiasm to sustain our country and to take up arms in her
defence. Captain Putnam, though sixty-three years of age, was full of
youthful ardor for the cause. The British troops were daily expected
to raid Concord or Lexington from Boston, to destroy war materials
collected there by the Continentals. Captain Putnam kept his gun and
ammunition at his bedside, ready for a moment's warning.
On the 19th of April, 1775, the British troops came out in force to
accomplish their object. When Captain Putnam waked in the early
morning, his five sons had gone out to repel the attack, but his gun
could not be found. His grandson, Elijah Putnam, then four or five
years old, well remembered his grandfather's distress and indignation
that his gun had been hidden. But this did not prevent his joining in
the sortie on the enemy. When his wife would have dissuaded him, the
Captain said, in the spirit of a true Putnam and '76 heroism, " Hannah,
I must go to meet the enemies of our freedom."
He and six or eight other old patriots ensconced themselves behind
a pile of shingles near the Meeting House and awaited the return of
the British on their retreat from Concord and Lexington. The enemy
had out a flanking party, who came upon Captain Putnam and his com-
panions in the rear, fired upon them, and killed them all. The boy,
Elijah, said he enjoyed the hubbub, the music, firing, etc., until his
grandfather was brought home on a cart, dead.
[212]
ITALIAN SOLDIERS IN THE DOLOMITE ALPS
tliroiiKli th<> courti'sy .f Mr. Ap>stin<> di- I'.iasi. Editor of " II Curroceio,
tin- Italian
THE FIRST AMERICAN TROOPS IN ITALY DURING THE WORLD WAR
Reproduced through the courtesy of Mr. Agostino de I>i;isi, Editor of " II Cnrroccio.
the Italian Review
VITTORIO EMANUELE ORLANDO, PREMIER OP ITALY
Reproduced through the courtesy of Mr. Agostino de Biasi,
Editor of " II Carroccio," the Italian Review
Till-: ANCIENT ARENA AT I'OLA
Reproduced through the courtesy of Mr. Agostino de Hiusi, Editor of " II Cnrrocelo.
the Italian Iteview
FH.MI:
Reproduced through the courtesy of Mr. Agostlno de Biasl, Editor of "II
Currocclo," the Italian Review
/
J *2
: -'
(FV
i: * ' "
<." i
- -
o M
B
*
02
8 I
An Ammran &?a (Captain in
iRriuilntimt ',
OJljp frraonal Sfarratinr of (Eaptain Cutijrr Etttlr, Ikfnrr, Unrinn, and
Aftrr tljr HetJolnttonani War OJrattHrribri from the (nuu; in thr
|!oBB*Bion of Hr. Joint ittanon HittU of VoHton
[Concluded from The Journal of American History, Volume XI,
Number 5]
HE FOLLOWING summer I commanded the sloop
Pidgeon in the coasting trade. Sometime during the
summer, the Penobscot expedition was planned, and
myself, hands and sloop were pressed into the service
at Boston, and our vessel was employed as a trans-
port with a load of provisions. The armed ships were
the Warren Frigate of 36 guns, also ten 20 gun Ships,
and four brigs from 16 to 18 guns besides several transports. The
Warren Frigate was commanded by Com. Saltonstall; the General
of the army was Solomon Lovell. We arrived there in three days,
pressing troops along shore.
The British had landed at Castine one week before, with 1000
troops. It was agreed between the Com. and Gen. that the former
should go into Castine harbour with his fleet, and the latter go in
above to co-operate with him. The troops landed with great spirit,
but were obliged to encounter the main guard, which they drove into
their redoubts. The Americans marched about half way to the fort
back of the army, when they discovered the Com. heave out a signal,
and haul off his fleet into the bay, which caused the enemy to come
to a halt. They then began to build forts, and cannonaded with the
English. We lay there three weeks, the Commodore not willing to
cooperate. Among us was one tribe of the Penobscot Indians.
[217]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
Being there three weeks, and nothing done, the English had time
to send a carrier to Halifax, but finding at that place no man-of-war,
they dispatched to N. York a fast Sailing cutter, with the news of the
invasion of the place. Admiral Howe dispatched a Seventy-four and
4 frigates. In a few days we saw them sailing up the river. The
American army were taken on board the transports, and the Ameri-
can man-of-war with the transports proceeded up the Penobscot, the
British in close chase behind. The American fleet was burned and
destroyed by the Americans themselves, where now the City of
Bangor stands. My Sloop lay above where the fleet was destroyed,
and was left unharmed.
Many suffered and died in travelling across the woods, from
fatigue and want of food, ere they reached the Kennebec river.
During the journey the Com. was shot at twice but without success.
Myself, and the others, proceeded in a barge down the Penobscot,
near to the English fleet, where we left the barge, and proceeded into
the woods; we there pitched a tent for the night, carrying provision.
The next day we travelled to Belfast where we arrived at noon. The
inhabitants had fled. We entered a vacant house from a field
adjoining, we gathered some green corn killed a lamb ; and cooked
us a dinner; then shut the house and travelled towards Broad Bay.
Here we purchased a boat, and came up to Boston. Again I reached
home perfectly destitute, but not at all discouraged.
The November following I shipped on board a letter-of-marque
Brig belonging to Col. Waters of Boston, bound to Cadiz in Spain.
Tobias Oakman, Master. After a rough passage we made the land
a little to the north of Cape Finisterre; the wind blowing a gale on
shore, we could not weather the Cape hauled off to the Northward.
The gale increasing, the following morning we were obliged to heave
to under short sail, under a reef'd main-sail and a main stay-sail.
The wind increased to a violent gale. At 4 the next morning, hove
the lead, and found shoal water. When the day broke, we found
ourselves embayed. Hauled down our sails, and let go our anchors.
She gave two or three pitches, then parted her cables. I sent two
men aloft to loose the main topsail which was close reefed; wearing
around, we shipped a sea, which carried away her masts, and stove in
her stern. I was washed from the quarter deck over her bows,
forward, where I caught hold of the fore-topmast staysail downhaul,
and hauled myself on to the wreck. After getting on to the wreck,
I found that one of my legs was broken. Very soon we went ashore
[218]
AN AMERICAN SEA CAPTAIN IN THE REVOLUTION
upon a reef of rocks, where the vessel filled. There being a channel
within the reef, which was two miles from the main shore, we lashed
ourselves to the after part of the wreck, the sea breaking over us, and
the gale continuing ; we found the vessel breaking in the middle ;
the forward part was washed away; nothing remained but the stern
posts and quarter deck to which we were lashed.
We remained in this perilous situation fifteen hours, when the
gale abated, and the tide ebbed the water being over the reef three
feet. On the northerly end of the reef was a castle call'd the Stone
round castle; it was situated on the south side in going in to Lisbon.
I sent some of the stoutest of the men to see if they could reach the
castle; they did and returned. We now resolved to set out for the
castle. My leg being broken, I was supported by two of the men -
we arrived safe.
At the castle we found a sergeant and his guard, who being very
hospitable, Shared their rations with us. At the upper part of the
castle were a number of convicts. This castle was built to the height
of 40 feet the same size and then its diameter was diminished, thus
leaving a platform all round for a tier of cannon; it then rose thirty
feet higher its foundation not being dry even at low tide. The
storm returned that night with redoubled fury, the sea breaking over
the castle.
After remaining here five days, a signal gun was fired by the
sergeant for the castle boat; but the sea being so high, it did not reach
the castle until two days after, when the sergeant went with us in the
boat to Bellish castle, and there delivered us to the sergeant of this
castle. Here we remained until the visit boat came to enquire where
we were from, and to what country we belonged. Previous to the
arrival of the visit boat, the Governors secretary entered the Castle,
making enquiries who we were, and where from. One-half hour
after, we received four loaves and a ham.
After the examination of the visit boat, we were allowed to land
at Bellisle. The first house we entered, was an Inn kept by an Irish
woman, who showed us much good feeling made us coffee,
toast &c.
At eight oclock that evening, a coach with four white horses
came to the door. It was Mr John Baptise, an officer in the employ
of the U. S. Government, to enquire if there were any from off that
wreck, who needed assistance, and wished to go to the hospital. I
[219]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
immediately presented myself, was placed in the carriage, and rode
to Lisbon, the distance of eight miles.
When we arrived at the hospital, I was carried up four flights
of stairs, into a room, where all were strange faces of different
nations. The hospital was over a church. The head surgeon soon
made his appearance; he was a Frenchman, his name Maseree. He
immediately ordered clean bed and bedding. I was also stripped of
my mangled habiliments, and dressed in clean linen, and placed in
bed. The shoe on the broken leg was not washed away ; I asked them
to preserve it, knowing it contained money in the heel ; I had it placed
under my pillow. The surgeon and his attendants returned with
warm water and a large poultice, which he applied from the ancle
to the hip. The limb was shockingly swollen; he applied the poultice
until he brought down all the swelling; he then made an examination,
took out several pieces of bone, and set the leg.
This occured in October. I remained at the hospital until the
following spring. I was treated with great kindness and attention
and although in my midnight dreams, the spirit of a kind mother and
beloved sisters would often hover round my pillow, still on waking,
the thought that I had escaped an early death, was ever present to the
mind, and I felt, that although far from home and friends, I had
every reason to be thankful.
After the surgeon gave me liberty to use my limb, I took the
money that was secreted in my shoe. This shoe I had made in
Marshfield before leaving home, and the money deposited in it while
making. Previous to this I had been left among strangers, perfectly
destitute, without money either to assist myself, or remunerate them
for kindness received. I was now leaving home and those interested
for me, far behind the future, was covered with a veil which a wise
Providence had never permitted human knowledge to rend, I knew
not with what this voyage might be fraught evil or good : I there-
fore resolved, if possible, to have something laid up, as the old adage
expresses, " for a wet day." I had a pair of shoes made and in the
heel of one, I had eight (80) dollar pieces in gold deposited; the
shoe on the broken leg was the shoe, which the swelling of the limb,
had prevented from being washed like its fellow, away. There were
eleven unfortunate Americans discharged from the hospital at this
time and this shoe possessed the only fund among us.
My first purchase with this money was at a rag fair, for a suit of
clothes. I then purchased a Portuguese, French, and Spanish pass.
[220]
AN AMERICAN SEA CAPTAIN IN THE REVOLUTION
We now all in company commenced our long and tedious journey,
over three hundred miles by land, ere we could reach a seaport that
would give us any prospect of a passage home, Our first days
journey brought us to St. Ubes. Here we spent the night.
That evening there came on shore, from an English privateer,
the Captain and Lieutenant. They were particular in their enquiries
who we were and where from. The former told us he had been
taken by the Americans, and carried into Salem, and treated exceed-
ingly well, for which he appeared very grateful, and ordered his
Lieutenant to go on board and get one dozen of neat's tongues, which
he gave us to put in our packs, He informed us that he had
travelled the same route, that the country was desolate and barren
until we got to Faro, that he had a pilot on board, a Portuguese, whom
he would discharge to guide us. This offer was gratefully accepted,
and the next morning, after purchasing some wine, which we put in
leather bottles, customary for travellers, I paid our bill, and we
commenced our journey.
The first two nights we were houseless, and slept upon the
ground. The third night we reached a village; it being Saturday,
we saw many shepherds driving home their flocks. We could obtain
no place to lodge in but a shed, and for that they charged us. Early
the following morning we were on our way, after hiring a Portuguese
boy with a mule to carry our baggage, to the next village. We went
into a tavern; the landlord would not allow us to sleep in the house,
but gave us a shed where we slept on the ground; for this even, he
charged us very high.
Once more the day dawning found us on our weary way the
pilot told us we should reach a village that night lying on the line
between Portugal and Spain we asked lodging at a tavern that
night, and they gave us a small house separate from it, in which to
sleep without bedding. The Spanish and English were at war, and
the house was surrounded by Spaniards who swore we were English
and they would take us prisoners. In vain the landlord expostulated
with them, saying we were Americans in distress, travelling to Faro;
they still persisted in forcing the door. We prepared to encounter
them with our clubs, the pilot told them they had better retreat, for we
were well armed ; they then disappeared.
In the morning after settling for our lodging, I purchased some
salt mackerel of the landlord, which we put in our packs we hired
a boy and a mule to carry them. While we were preparing to start,
[221]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
he stole the mackerel I had just purchased of him. The pilot enter-
tained us with tales of murder and robbery committed on that road;
it was the worst we had to travel, every now and then we would pass
a cross, which he informed us marked the spot where travellers had
been robbed and murdered. It was the time of Lent and we could
obtain no meat, the people being very superstitious. At ten that
morning we came to a single house by the road side, where there were
two Spanish females. The pilot asked them if they could sell us some
meat, they shook their heads he then named that we had tea in our
packs, which we would exchange for meat, They feared lest their
husbands should come but after some hesitation, one kept a watch at
the door, and the other got us some pork we paid her liberally, and
she motioned to us to be gone, that their husbands would not hesitate
to stab us, should they return. We marched on our way, with our
baggage ahead of us ; soon we spied three men rush out of the bushes,
and seizing the mule take off the baggage ; we rushed upon them -
they fled.
This evening we arrived at Faro, a seaport in Spain. There we
put up for the night, and had a chamber with mats spread on the
floor, Here quite a tragedy occurred; the landlord whipped his wife
most inhumanly. The same evening an Englishman came to see
us he advised us to get a boat to carry us to a place call'd lammont,
which would be better than to go by land. He was the mate of a
Portuguese brig, and told us if we got a boat to come alongside, he
would give us some provisions. Next morning I waited on the
French Consul, and was treated very politely. He said he would try
and hire us a boat, which he did, also two men to take the boat back.
The same day we left Faro to proceed in the boat to lammont; we
went alongside the Portuguese brig, and the mate hove us in a ham,
4 dozen of biscuit, and part of a cheese.
We reached the mouth of lammont river the next morning
here we met a Spanish shollop, coming out, bound to Cadiz, loaded
with small fish, and manned by six men. The Captain was very old.
We shifted on board this shallop, and sailed towards Cadiz with a
fair wind. When night approached the Spanish Capt. having no
compass, steered by a star ; at ten the clouds came over, and the stars
were shut in, the wind blowing fresh. The Spaniards fell on their
knees, imploring the aid of their saints. Directly the Capt. concluded
to go ashore, and took his cask of oil to break the surf, and bore
away towards the shore. We being the strongest party (eleven to
[222]
AN AMERICAN SEA CAPTAIN IN THE REVOLUTION
six) hauled the shallop onto her course, and obliged the old Spaniard
to take the helm, it still continuing very thick. At one that morning
we struck on the Porpoise Rocks at the mouth of the Cadiz bay; we
shipped two seas and went over, which filled the boat ; with our hats
we bailed out water, fish and all we lightened her and directly
made Cadiz light, and ran in near the wall of the City. The Sentry
from the wall hailed the boat, and told us to come no nearer the shore
the old Captain then haul'd down sails and let go his anchor ; it being
very high water, he paid (paid written in pencil above line; beneath it
in ink is veered. G. C. W.) away his hauser (hauser written in
pencil over the word hausail. G. C. W.) till the boat got close in, the
tide ebbed, and left her quite dry. At daylight I paid one dollar
apiece, passage money, and we left the boat.
We went to the gate of the City, and sat down on some ship-
timber ; one of our men was then two days sick with a fever. When
the gate was opened, and the crowd got out, we marched up to the
gate two of us carrying the sick man. The keepers began to search
us, I immediately showed them the Spanish pass, they bid us walk in.
When a little within the gate, we met a Spaniard who spoke English ;
he invited us to his house, and gave us a breakfast of coffee and fish,
and told us we were welcome to remain there until we could find a
passage home. We very gratefully accepted his offer, my funds
being entirely exhausted. We lodged in a chamber where there were
plenty of beds, and soon found we had plenty of company; we
slept none. At twelve that night, we heard much commotion below.
Soon the Spaniard came into the chamber accompanied by Spanish
officers in gold lace; they were in search of their men who had run
away from the fleet laying in the bay; in consequence of which, we
had to rise and be examined; finding their mistake, they left the
house.
At eleven o'clock the next morning, I waited upon John Jay, Esq.,
Minister Plenipotentionary to the Court of Madrid, who with his wife
was brought there in the confederacy Frigate. I told him our situa-
tion, and the circumstance of our having a sick man among us. He
sent Col. Livingstone, his secretary, with me, to get the sick man into
a hospital; in which we succeeded. There were then two American
letter-of-marque ships laying in Cadiz bay. We offered to work our
passage home, but they both refused taking us.
Finding no chance of a passage to America, we two days after
found an English brig, which had captured an American ship, and
[223]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
had then been risen upon by the mate of the captured ship, and
carried into Cadiz; no one on board except this mate, whose name
was Morgan ; she was bound for Cape Ann. This brig carried twelve
guns. In the meantime, Capt. Stevens of the Rambler arrived, being
captured by an English frigate. Capt. Stevens, his crew and our-
selves, made twenty-one. I now waited once more on Mr. Jay, told
him that we had a chance of working our passage home in this brig,
by finding our own provisions; but we were unable to procure them,
being destitute. Mr. Jay told me his commission did not extend to
him the power to find any one supplies, but he was sorry to see Ameri-
cans there in distress. He said he could do this for us ; we must sign
an obligation to pay for the provision at the Navy Board Jn Boston,
or serve on board a continental ship until the debt was paid. We
signed this obligation, a copy of which was put into the hands of the
Capt. of the Brig, to be delivered to Mr. Warren, the President of
the Navy Board at Boston. He then ordered his Secretary to furnish
us with provisions for the passage.
We sailed from Cadiz the 26th of March. Thirty days after,
we got soundings on George's Bank, and were then becalmed. The
same day we saw an English privateer schooner coming towards us
by the help of her sweeps. She was on the starboard side. We
voted in Capt. Stevens commander, in case we had a battle with her,
then shifted two guns over the side to make out the tier. Capt.
Stevens ordered us to our quarters. When the privateer came up to
us, we gave her a broadside ; she fired upon us, then dropped a-stern
and came up on the larboard side. As soon as the guns would bear
upon her, we gave her another broadside; they returned the same.
The schooner giving up the contest, dropped a-stern and made off,
we giving her three cheers. The breeze springing up, we steered for
Cape Ann, and arrived safe in the evening. Capt. Stevens invited me
out to his house at Manchester. The next day we sailed for Boston.
When we arrived, the Capt delivered our obligation to the Navy
Board. I obtained some money from friends and went immediately
and discharged my portion to Mr. Warren. After this I saw Mr.
Warren, who told me I was the only one of the eleven who had met
the obligation. Once more I reached home entirely destitute.
After remaining at home a short time I became weary of the
monotony of a farmer's life, and bade home and those dear to me
adieu; and in 1780 I entered on board the U. States Ship Protector, of
26 guns, crew 230, as midshipman and prize master. She was then
[224]
AN AMERICAN SEA CAPTAIN IN THE REVOLUTION
nearly ready for a cruise, she was commanded by John Foster Wil-
liams Esq. of Boston; commission officers my brother Geo. Little
of Marshfield, first Lieutenant, Joseph Cunningham of Boston
second Lieutenant, Lemuel Weeks of Falmouth, Cape Cod, third
Lieutenant.
We dropped down to Nantasket road, where we laid until the
first of April 1780. We set sail for a cruise of six months. Our
course was directed eastward, keeping along the coast, till we got off
Mt. Desert, and then we steered for the banks of Newfoundland,
meeting no enemy. We cruised off the banks nearly eight weeks,
most of the time in a dense fog, without encountering friend or foe.
On the morning of June the ninth, the fog began to clear away,
and the man at the mast head gave notice that he discovered a ship to
the windward of us. We perceived her to be a large ship under
English colors, standing down before the wind for us. We were on
the leeward side. As she came down upon us She appeared to be as
large as a 74, the Capt. and Lieutenant looking at her with their
glasses. After consulting about the ship, the[y] decided She was not
an English frigate, but a large ship, and the sooner we got alongside
the better. The Boatswain was ordered to pipe all hands to quarters,
and clear the ship for action. Hammocks were brought up and
stuffed into the nettings decks wet and sanded matches lighted
and burning bulk head hooked up. We were not deceived respect-
ing her size. It afterwards proved she was a ship of eleven hundred
tons burden a Company ship, which cruised in the West Indies
some time and then took a cargo of sugar and tobacco at St. Kitts,
bound to London 36 twelve pounders upon the gun deck, furnished
with 250 men and call'd the " Admiral Duff," Richard Strange
master.
We were to the leeward of her and standing to the northward
under cruising sail. The[y] came down near us, and aimed to pass
us, and go ahead. After passing a little by to the leeward, She hove
to under fighting sail. We were all this time under English colors,
observed her preparing for action. Very soon I heard the sailing
master call for his trumpet, " Let fall the fore-sail, sheet home the
main top-gallant sail ! " We steered down across her stern, and
haul'd up under her lee quarter. At the same time we were breeching
our guns aft, to bring her to bear. Our first Lieutenant possessed a
very powerful voice; he hailed the ship from the gang board, and
enquired " What ship is that? " was answered " The Admiral Duff."
[225]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
" Where are you from, and where bound? " they answered " From a
cruise, bound for London ;" and then enquired, " And what ship is
that?" we gave no answer. The Capt. ordered a broadside given,
and colors changed at the first flash, and the thirteen stripes took
the place of the English ensign ; they gave us three cheers and fired a
broadside; the partly overshot us, their ship being so much higher
than ours, cutting away some of our rigging. The action commenced
within pistol shot, and now began a regular battle, broadside to broad-
side.
After we had engaged one half hour, there came in a cannon
ball through the side and killed Mr Scollay, one of our midshipmen;
he commanded the fourth twelve pounder from the stern, myself
commanded the third; the ball took him in the head, his brains flew
upon my gun and into my face. The man at my gun, who ram'd
down the charge, was a stout Irishman; immediately on the death
-of Mr. Scollay, he stripped himself of his shirt, and exclaimed, " an
faith, if they kill me, they shall tuck no rags into me! " The action
continued about an hour, when all the top-men on board the enemy's
ship were kill'd by our marines, who were sixty in number all Ameri-
cans. Our marines killing the man at the wheel, caused the ship to
come down upon us her cat-head stove in our quarter-gallery.
We lashed their gib-boom to our main shrouds, our marines from the
quarter deck firing into their port holes, kept them from charging.
We were ordered from our quarters to board, but before we were able
the lashing broke we were ordered back to quarters to charge, the
ship shooting along side of us, the yards nearly locked; we gave her
a broadside, which cut away her mizen mast and made great havock
among them. We perceived her a sinking, at the same time saw her
main-top-gallonit sail on fire, which ran down the rigging and caught
a hogshead of cartridges under the quarter deck and blew it off.
At this time, from one of their forward guns, there came into the
port, where I commanded, a charge of grape shot ; with three of them
I was wounded one between my neck bone and wind pipe, one
through my jaw, lodging in the roof of my mouth, and taking off a
piece of my tongue; the other through the upper lip, taking away a
part of the lip and all my upper teeth. I was immediately taken down
to the cock-pit, to the surgeon my gun was fired only once after-
wards ; I had fired nineteen times.
I lay unattended to, being considered mortally wounded, and
was passed by that the wounds of those more likely to live might be
[226]
AN AMERICAN SEA CAPTAIN IN THE REVOLUTION
dressed. I was perfectly sensible, and heard the surgeon remark,
"Let Little lay attend to the others first he will die!" Per-
ceiving me motion to him, he came to me and began to wash off the
blood, and dress my wound. After dressing the lip and jaw, he was
turning from me ; I put my hand to my neck he returned and ex-
amining my neck, pronounced it the deepest wound of the three. I
bled profusely, the surgeon thought two gallons. I was placed in
my berth.
By this time the enemy's ship had sunk, and nothing was to be
seen of her. She went down on fire, with colors flying. Our boats
were injured by the shots, and our carpenters were repairing them,
in order to put out and pick up the men from the English that were
afloat. They succeeded in getting 55 one half wounded and scalded.
The first Lieut, told me that such was their pride, when on the brink
of a watery grave, that they fought like demons, preferring death
with the rest of their comrades, rather than captivity; and that it
was with much difficulty that many of them were forced into the
boats several, even made attempts to jump overboard. Our sur-
geon amputated limbs from five of the prisoners , and attended them
as if they had been our own men. One of the 55 was then sick with
the West India fever, and had floated out of his hammock between
decks. The weather was excessively warm and in less than ten days,
60 of our men had taken the epedemic.
The " Admiral Duff " had two American Capt's with- their crews
on board, prisoners, these were among the 55 saved by our boats.
One of the Capt's told Captain Williams, that he was with Capt.
Strange when our vessel hove in sight; he told him he thought her
one of our continental frigates. Capt. Strange thought not, but he
wished she might be, at any rate, were she only a Salem Privateer,
she would be a clever little prize to take home with him. During the
battle, while Capt. Williams was walking the quarter deck, a shot
from the enemy took his speaking trumpet from his hand; he picked
it up and with great calmness continued his orders.
We sailed for the coast of Nova Scotia near to Halifax. After
cruising there a week we discovered a large ship steering for us; we
aimed for her until we got within two leagues of her, when we found
her to be a large English frigate ; we hove about and ran from her ;
our men being sick, we did not dare to engage her, this was at 4
O'clock in the afternoon ; the frigate made way fast for us ; when she
came up near us, we fired four stern chasers, and Kept firing, the
[227]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
ship in chase; when she got near our stern she luff'd and gave us a
broadside, it did no other damage, save one shot lodging in the main
mast and cutting away some rigging. By this we had gained ahead
of her; we made a running fire till dark, the enemy choosing not to
come alongside; at 8 in the evening, she left and haul'd her wind to
the southward, and we for the North. The following morning she
was in sight, but did not come near us ; Kept on her course. The Capt.
thought it necessary to put into an eastern port for wood and water ;
we sail'd for Broad Bay, and arrived at the mouth and anchored in a
cove near the shore, called Muscongus. The Capt. made arrange-
ments with a farmer at this place to land our sick, at an out building
leaving the surgeons mate to take care of them, making a sort of hos-
pital. I was then sufficiently recovered to be able to walk the deck.
The next day, at four in the afternoon, we discovered a large black
snake coming down from out the bushes abreast the ship ; he took the
water and swam by us; we judged him to be 40 feet long, and his
middle the size of a man's body; he carried his head six feet above
water. We manned a barge, and went in chase of him; when fired
at, he would dive like a sea-fowl. They chased him a mile and a half
firing continually. The snake landed at Lowd's Island, and dis-
appeared in the woods. The barge returned to the ship.
Among our crew was a fellow half indian and half negro who
coveted a fatted calf, belonging to a farmer on the shore; he found
one man only, willing to assist him. Cramps (the negro's name)
took a boat one evening and went on shore to commit the depreda-
tion ; he secured the victim and returned to the ship without discovery.
He arrived under the ship's bows and called for his participator to
lower the rope to hoist the booty on board, but his fellow-companion
had dodged below and it so happened the 1st Lieut, was on deck.
Cramps thinking it was his fellow worker in iniquity, hail'd him in a
low voice, requesting him to do as agreed, and that quick. The Lieut,
thinking something out of the way was going on. obeyed the summons.
Cramps fixed the noose around the calf's neck and cried " pull away,
blast your eyes! my back is almost broke carrying the critter so far
on the land, give us your strength on the water ! " The Lieut, obey'd
and Cramps boosting in the rear, the victim was soon brought on deck.
Cramps jumped on board, and found both himself and calf in the
possession of the Lieutenant. The animal was uninjured, and kept
on board that night; the following morning the thief was ordered to
shoulder the calf and march to the farmer and ask forgiveness, and
[228]
AN AMERICAN SEA CAPTAIN IN THE REVOLUTION
return to take the reward for his iniquity fifty lashes, which was
however remitted by the pleading of the kind hearted farmer.
Not being sufficiently recovered to do duty, I was dismissed with
letters, and came up to Boston in a coaster. After the ship was sup-
plied, she sailed out of Muscongus, on a cruise of two months, leaving
the sick ashore, and then returned to Boston. A number of the crew
and some officers died of the epidemic soon after they landed. I
remained at my father's two months, and was partially recovered of
my wounds. I then returned to Boston and joined the ship for her
second cruise, but we did not sail for three months after. This was
intended for a nine month's cruise. We sailed out of Boston, our
course east, till we got soundings for Newfoundland, where we
cruised about two weeks, and then shaped our course for the West
Indies, where we cruised to the windward of Barbadoes. Soon after
reaching the latitude of this Island, we retook a Dutch ship which
was a prize to the English; we manned her and ordered her for
Boston ; we still cruised in this latitude.
One morning the man at the main top mast head, cried out a sail
running down to Barbadoes in the same latitude. It proved to be a
very large ship ; we made sail and gave chase to her, she being to the
windward of us, haul'd her wind to the south. We carried a press
of sail and were beating towards her; when within one half mile, a
heavy trade wind, as we were going in stays, carried away our main
top mast with the cap, which made quite a wreck; the English ship
discovering our loss, bore away and went on her course across our
stern. We then went to work and got up a new top mast and top
gallant mast, it took two days to get our vessel in order.
We cruised in this latitude one more month, took one small
English brig; then bore away for Martinique for water; lay at
this Island ten days and then sailed under the lea for Dominique.
We met a large sloop which the Capt. thought was a Droger. The
first Lieut, advised to speak with her. She was an English sloop
from Tobago, loaded with assorted cargo, and twelve slaves. We
boarded the sloop, manned her with prize master and crew, and took
her in tow. We then directed our course towards Porto Rico and
anchored in a cove at the west end of the Island, where the Capt. sold
the vessel, slaves and cargo. We lay at this cove near two weeks
we then sailed towards Charleston, South Carolina. One day out
we experienced a heavy gale, which obliged us to lay too under Short
sail, the wind to the northward. At two o'clock in the afternoon, we
[229]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
discovered a sail at the leeward; we wore around and made sail in
chase, found we gained fast upon her, and at sunset we could see her
hull we still gave chase, but when night set in, we lost sight of her.
There came over a heavy cloud with squalls of thunder and lightning ;
and by the flashes we discovered the ship, which had altered her
course; we haul'd our wind in chase, and were soon alongside. The
next flash of lightning convinced us she was of English colors. We
hail'd her. She answered " from Charleston, bound to Jamaica," and
enquired, where we were from ; the first Lieut, answered the Alliance
U. S. Frigate. Our men were all to quarters, and lanterns burning at
every port. Our Capt. told him to haul down his colors and heave
too ; he replied his men had gone below, and would not come up ; that
he would obey as soon as he could. Twas done, our barge was
lowered, a prize master and crew put on board, and we took posses-
sion, of the ship. Our barge then brought both officers and crew on
board prisoners. She proved to be a ship of 800 tons burden, with
three decks fore and aft, carrying 24 nine pounders between decks
and manned with 80 men. We ordered her for Boston she arrived
safe.
We then set sail for Charleston, cruising upon that coast until the
first of April, taking nothing. We now bore away for N. York, where
we cruised just upon soundings. We fell in with an American letter-
of-marque Brig bound for Boston, commanded by Capt. Cunningham,
who was our 2nd Lieut, on our first cruise. He had a large quantity
of specie on board. He desired Capt. Williams to take it on board
our ship, thinking it would be more safe, as our cruise was nearly
finished. Capt. Cunningham arrived safe at Boston.
Two days after tin's a sail was discovered ahead we came up
with her, found her from Jamaica, loaded with rum we took her
and after much persuasion I was prevailed on to take charge of her,
and selected my crew, keeping the English mate on board. I had a
copy of a Capt/s commission, but no orders how to proceed, which
the Lieut, told me he would bring directly on board. The barge
returned to the ship and was hoisted right in, they having discovered
another prize, made chase for her immediately. I concluded to
follow her till dark; but as she showed no lights, I shaped my course
for Nantucket. It was the mate's watch; after daylight he came
down and informed me there were two large ships to the leeward of
use, we haul'd our wind to the southward. I took my glass, went
aloft to view them, discovered them to be two men-of-war, turning
[230]
AN AMERICAN SEA CAPTAIN IN THE REVOLUTION
my glass to the windward, I discovered our ship bearing down as
soon as she discovered the men-of-war she haul'd her wind south
They were within a mile of me, but appeared to take no notice what-
ever of me, but were in close chase of our ship. They passed me
within one half mile I bore away across the stern before the wind.
Ere I was out of sight, the wind shifting brought the men-of-war
into the Protectors wake. In three days after this I arrived safe in
Boston with my prize. I waited upon Governor Hancock, and told
him in what situation I left the ship expected she was taken.
After he had made enquires of our cruise, I returned on board the
prize, In ten days after we had news that the Protector was taken
by the Roebuck and Mayday frigates and carried into New York.
After discharging the prize and delivering it up, I left Boston for
home, I was never after in the U. S. service.
In the spring of 1781, in April, Captain Ingraham, from Salem
came to Marshfield in a small vessel, to bring rigging and sails for a
new ship he had purchased, built in North River. He invited me to
return to Salem with him, saying that if I wished for a good berth, he
could procure me one. I accepted the offer, and staid two weeks at
this gentleman's house. I was applied to by a Capt. William Orne,
who offered me the berth of Lieut, on board a letter-of-marque brig
call'd Jupiter. This ship was five hundred tons, and carried twenty
guns and 180 men. I accepted his offer, and after loading we sailed
for the West Indies.
To the windward of Turks Island we discovered a large
Schooner. We were running down before the wind, when we got
within a mile of her, we observed she showed no colors; we fired a
gun as a signal for her to show colors, she did not. Our Boatswain
and Gunner had been prisoners a short time before, in Jamaica ; they
told Capt. Orne that she was the Lyon Schooner, bearing 18 guns,
which they had seen in Jamaica, where she belonged. Our Boat-
swain then piped all hands to quarters, and we prepared for action.
Capt. Orne not being acquainted with a warlike ship told me I must
take the command, advising me to run from her. I told him in thus
doing we should surely be taken. I ordered the men in the tops to
take in the studden sails; we then ran down close to her, luff'd, and
gave her a broadside, which shot away both of her topmasts ; she then
bore away, and made sail and run from us, we in chase. We con-
tinued thus for three hours; then came alongside; I hail'd and told
them to shorten sail, or I'd sink them on the spot our barge was
[231]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
lowered and I boarded her all this time she had no colors set. I
hail'd our ship, and told Capt. Orne I thought her a clear prize, and
bade the men prepare to board her. But the Capt. hail'd for the boat
to return; I obeyed; and told him she had a good many men and
several guns; the Capt said he would have nothing to do with her,
as he feared they might rise upon us; much to my reluctance we
left her.
We soon after made Turk's Island, and the next day we anchored
in the harbor of Cape-Francis, where we laid three days then
sailed for Port-au-Prince. Here it was very sickly the epidemic
prevailing to a great extent. After laying here two weeks, one night
from twenty to thirty of our men were attacked with the distemper
very violently became raving distracted. Our Physician admin-
istered a powerful emetic, and blistered the back of the neck which
broke the pain and all but one recovered. We lay here four weeks
from this. We discharged our cargo of flour, selling at a great price,
and then freighted with sugar and coffee. The Capt. ordered me to
sail out of the Bito of Lugan and trim the ship but to stand in at
sunset, for he should come on board; finding however that the boat
tarried, laying under a foresail we drafted eastward next morning
were out of sight of land. I sent the only man I had aloft to cut
away the gaskets, and loose the top sail, running north west. I
placed the man at the wheel and went aloft. I saw the Island of
Sequin ahead being near the mouth of Kennebec river. We got as
far as the Sugar Loaves, the vessel being so water log'd she would not
steer we came about and went down towards Rain Island. I
expected to go ashore on this Island. As we got close to land we
struck an eddy tide which sheered our vessel off, and the top sails
fill'd, and we succeeded in running her aground in Eels-Eddy a small
cove with mud bottom.
Two Marblehead Schooners were lying there, loaded with wood ;
their crews came on board and assisted us at the pumps; the mud
stopping the leak, the vessel was cleared of the water before night.
The following morning Col. McCobb came on board, and advised me
to get the brig up to Parker's flats, about 3 miles distant, as there
she would be more safe. With his and other men's assistance, we
succeeded. Capt. H. Rogers came on board. I got him to take care
of the brig that night; myself and crew went ashore to Mr. Parker's.
The next day got a Physician to attend the frozen men. Looking
out early in the morning from my window, I found the vessel was
[232]
AI'TAIN Ll'TUEK LITTLE
from tlio piiintinj; Iu oils owned by his grandchildren, Mr. Luther
Llttk- :iinl Miss .Ionium Little of ISoston
UrPKK TIIK OLD WELL IN THE KITCHEN OF CAPTAIN LUTHER LITTLE'S HOI SK.
SEA VIEW, MAKSHFIKLI). MASSACHUSETTS
LOWEK ItKAU VIKW OF CAPTAIN LITTLE'S HOUSE
UPPKR-~ CAPTAIN l.ITHKH LITTLE'S DESK IN IMS OLD IIOMK AT MA1ISIIFIELD.
MASSACHUSETTS
LOWER THE FKONT DOOK-WAY OF T1IE OLD LITTLK 11"! Si:
TIL DANMARK ocNORGE,
TOLD KAMMER ^ ORE-SU$D>aver fig
vedbprfigen angivet Skiver
ftrogenogfatforCRONB
men frat. (' Zc r . ./ *#**/>
de Ladning , agter fig defmed til
o nu clareret hvis burde.
i bar
erkom-
nied oniftaaen-
ORE-SUNOS TOLD-KAMMER,
. -^7 XV-'V x7
Ao. 1792,
FAC-SIMILE OP A ItAMSlI I ( H T.M KNT IN ('( )N\K( 'TI( >N WITH r.M'TAl.N LITTLE'S
KUSSIAN AND SCANDINAVIAN TItADIM; KX I'Kl HTK >N, 1792
AN AMERICAN SEA CAPTAIN IN THE REVOLUTION
not to be seen. I hastened down to the shore, and saw her two miles
below ; I procured some men and a boat and went to her She had
brought up her stern just cleared the rocks there came a large
field of ice, which carried her there ; again succeeded in getting her
up to the flats The following morning found the ice run so swift,
it was impossible to lay there; hoisted our anchors and made sail
down the river, it was very thick, the wind being at the north-east.
I had hired four men by the run for Boston. When we got out of
the river, intending to go to Portland, the vapor on the water being
very thick I concluded to shape my course for Cape Ann with a fair
wind, the vessel leaking as much as ever. A little before day break
we made Thachers Island light, which was rather to the southward of
us, we reefed our topsail and hauled to the southward. At daylight
came on a heavy snow storm, wind N. E. We bore away and tracked
the cape Ann shore, and at last through the snow discovered the
trees on the eastern point. We beat the brig into Cape Ann above
Ten Pound Island let go both anchors. There we lay two days in
a heavy snow storm. We had four feet of water in the hold. I went
on shore and entered Capt. Somes tavern and got some men to help
pump out the vessel. Remained here three days.
Capt. Somes commanded a small packet, and returned from
Boston after the storm cleared away. He told me I could not get to
Boston unless I went through Broad Sound, the rest of the channel
being frozen. The next day was clear wind N. W. We sailed
from Cape Ann keeping up near the Marblehead shore, with a signal
out for a pilot till I got near Broad-Sound. No pilot came bore
away for the Light-house Channel. When we got abreast of the
Light-house, a pilot came on board. I enquired why he did not come
to carry me through Broad Sound, as the rest of the channels were
frozen He attempted to go through the Narrows, but did not suc-
ceed ; tried the ship channel that too was frozen. After getting
here, he said he must go round and go through Broad Sound. I
insisted that the vessel should not go without the light we went
under Georges Island and anchored, we let go our best bower anchor,
there being every symptom of a squall arising, and handed sail.
When it was nearly morning, the barge made its appearance; after
the Capt. was on board, we immediately weighed anchor and set sail
for Salem.
Before leaving Port-au-Prince, we had been informed there were
two English frigates cruising for prizes in Crooked Island passage,
[237]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
through which we had to pass. When we were about half way
through we discovered colors hoisted upon a small Island. I was
in my hammock quite unwell the Capt. sent for me on deck asked
me if I thought there had been a vessel cast away on the Island
after spying it attentively with my glass, I told him that it was no
doubt a wreck and that I could discover men on the Island, and that
probably they were in distress; advised him to send a boat and take
them off. He said the boat should not go unless I went in her; I
told him I was too unwell, to send Mr. Leach the mate, He would
not listen to me I went and landed at the leeward of the Island,
and walked towards the wreck, when ten men came towards us.
They were the Capt. and crew of the unfortunate vessel. They were
much moved at seeing us said they were driven ashore on the
Island and had been there 10 days without a drop of water. They
gladly left their valuable cargo of flour and pork strewed along the
beach. By this time Capt. Orne had hove a signal for our return,
there being a frigate in chase. Going to the ship, the wrecked Capt.
who was an old man, named Peter Trott, asked me where our vessel
was from I told him we were bound to Salem, an American port ;
he was quite relieved, fearing it was an English man-of-war. We
came alongside and the boat was hoisted in, and every sail set, the
frigate in chase, she gained upon us. At dark the frigate was
about a mile a-stern. The clouds were thick and it was dark. I told
the Captain we were nearly in their power, our only chance was to
square away and run to the leeward, across the passage, it being so
dark they could not discover us with their night glasses. We lay too
until we judged the frigate had passed us. Towards morning, made
sail, and fetched through the passage without being discovered.
Off Nantucket w? got soundings, at daylight, we made
Naman's land. At sunrise a pilot came aboard, informing us there
were two English frigates lying in the Vineyard Sound we bore
away with a fair wind for Rhode Island, and in the evening we
arrived safe at Newport. Discharged here 60 Hogsheads of sugar.
The ship was haul'd in for repairs, and when they were completed,
went round for Salem, where we safely arrived.
I remained at home until the following Nov. when I was offered
a Capt.'s berth of a large brig, which had a round house and steered
by a wheel, which was uncommon in those days for merchantmen.
She was loaded with timber and bound to Cape Francis named
Live Oak. After a short passage reached the Cape safe, discharged
[238]
AN AMERICAN SEA CAPTAIN IN THE REVOLUTION
and freighted with molasses, and sailed for Boston. When in the
latitude of 38 in a heavy gale of wind, laying too we started a butt,
which obliged us to keep both pumps going night and day. The
weather being thick, and wind scant, we did not reach Cape Cod, but
kept on to the northward with reef sail, and the wind now blowing
heavy, At four in the afternoon we found we had four feet of water
in the hold, which obliged us to hand Our sails, all but the fore-sail
eased off the vessel north. At twelve o'clock we made Cape Eliza-
beth, the rock close under our bows we wore around under a fore
sail and hove too, that night all but one of the crew were frozen
there we lay ten days, both pumps going night and day
The wind then coming S. E. it became a thaw, we made sail with
a fair wind and run round long Island head, cutting the ice, into the
Eastern Channel, taking us the most of one day. This channel being
opened, the pilot assured me we should be up to town in half an hour;
but it was not the case. In a few minutes he run the brig on the
Castle rocks. I left her, got into the boat, telling the pilot to get the
vessel up if he could. I then went up to Boston; he succeeded in
getting the brig up to Long Wharf the following morning. We
discharged her - - The weather remained very cold, and we were
obliged to cut most of the hogsheads out of the ice I was once more
safe on terra-firma.
Here, at this era of my life the wheel of fortune turned. The
last 17 years had been spent mostly on the wide waters. I had passed
through scenes at which the heart shrinks, as memory recalls them;
but now the reader will find the scene change ; my ill luck was ended.
I remained at home several months, and in the meantime was
married to Susanna White, daughter of Abijah White Esq. She was
of the fourth generation from peregrine White, the first man born
in New England.
Two months from this I continued my West India voyages, until
I had made twenty-four successful ones mostly for the same
owner, Daniel Sargent, Esq. always bringing back every man, even
to cook & boy. After this I exchanged into the Russia trade, for the
same owner, where I continued six years, making six voyages. I
sailed every year the first of January, for Lisbon, and from thence
about the first of March up to Petersburg in Russia with a freight.
The first of these voyages I arrived into the Baltic Sea too early in
the spring; I found great fields of ice. I got by them and succeeded
[239]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
in getting up the Gulf of Finland as far as abreast of Revel; here I
was frozen in solid.
The next day a sleigh with four horses came alongside, and the
gentleman who was in it offered to take me up to the City. He was
the Clerk of a German Merchant. He advised me to send my bills
over by mail to Petersburg. I staid at this merchants house that
night and he sent me on board my vessel in the morning.
I was invited, while in Revel, by the gentleman to whom I sold
my cargo, to the wedding of his niece, given by her Grandmother.
The ceremony was performed in the Assembly House.
The guests were 380 in number, some coming a great distance.
I was the only foreigner among them. The parties married were Mr
John Fessay to Miss Catherine Dubray. They had a band of Ger-
man musicians, who struck up a lively air, as every carriage drew up
to the Assembly House. The Bride was a beautiful Girl, dressed
with taste and splendor. Her gown was of white satin, spangled,
with a rich gold border round the bottom. Her brow was orna-
mented with diamonds valued at 300 guineas. The Bridegroom was
dressed in a superb suit of black, white satin vest, ornamented and
spangled with gold. After the Ceremony which was of the Church
of England, all were seated and took coffee By this time supper
was announced, which consisted of 110 different dishes of meats,
besides every variety of jelly, tarts &c &c, then followed a very
elegant dessert. The meats were all carved by the servants. We
were three hours at the supper table. The Bride was placed on an
eminence from which she could overlook the company. The Bride-
groom's Father proposed drinking her health in a glass of Cham-
paigne. It was gracefully done by all rising and touching their
glasses at once. After supper the room was immediately cleared,
the musicians placed, and then began the leading dance, by the Bride
and Bridegroom and all their relations, the set dancing fifty couples
at a time. - - The dancing continued until twelve next day, when the
gentleman's Father invited all the company to his house the next
evening. Then followed the gifts; every guest had a present of some
kind, many of them very valuable mine was a pair of large silver
spoons marked P. D. The company then all withdrew.
I staid in the City of Revel six weeks, when the ice opened, and
we sailed for Petersburg, and got into Cronstadt mould the 28 ht of
May. I found sending my bills by mail very much to my advantage.
We loaded and returned to Boston. By this voyage I cleared the
[240]
AN AMERICAN SEA CAPTAIN IN THE REVOLUTION
vessel, and 500 pounds sterling for the owners. The succeeding
voyages were all successful.
During one of them when off Norway in a cold snow storm,
lying too, a man on the main yard, handing mainsail, fell overboard,
and went under the vessel and came up on the leeward side. I was
then on the quarter deck, caught a hencoop, and threw it into the
ocean. He succeeded in getting hold of it. I then ordered the top-
sails hove back, and to cut away the lashing of the yawl immediately ;
indbemeldte SKIPPER haver ladt
PART OP THE ACCOMPANYING DANISH DOCUMENT IN CONNECTION WITH CAPTAIN
LITTLE'S RUSSIAN AND SCANDINAVIAN TRADING EXPEDITION, 1792
ordered the mate and two men to jump in. The man not being then
in sight, I told them to row to the windward. They succeeded in
taking him and brought him on board ; he was alive, although unable
to speak or stand ; I had him taken into the cabin, and by rubbing and
giving him something hot, he was soon restored, and able in three
hours to do duty. He was in the water thirty minutes. I asked him
what he expected would be his fate when overboard, he said that he
tried the hencoop lying too, and found that would not answer, then
thought he would try it a scuddnig " and Sir," added he, " if you had
[241]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
not sent your boat just as you did, I should have borne away for the
coast of Norway," from which we were then five leagues.
On the same voyage, returning home, my Brother William F.
Little died of consumption, he being the only man I ever lost; In all
my West India and Russia voyages never lost a spar, boat or anchor.
In 1797 I quitted the sea entirely, being 41 years old; my wife
had been dead four years. In 1798 I married Hannah Lovell,
daughter of General Solomon Lovell of Weymouth, and returned to
the farm on which my father lived and died, in Marsh field. I bought
out the other heirs, retaining myself the homestead which had
belonged to my great Grandfather; and here I still remain, generally
having enjoyed good health, and arrived at the advanced age of 84
years.
LUTHER LITTLE
January 5 th 1841
TRANSCRIPT OF FLEET SIGNALS FOR THE PENOBSCOT
EXPEDITION SENT TO CAPTAIN LITTLE
[See accompanying fac-simile reproduction of the document]
Signals By Day
For sailing Fore Topsail Loose
All to Tack Strip. d Flagg att M T M head
Bear up before the Wind Pendant att Mizen Pee c k & Jack
att Main Topmast head
Transports to Disperse & Shift for
themselves United States Flagg in the Mizen
Shrouds
Signals By Night
To Anchor Three Lights one att Each
mast [.we] head
To Weigh Three Lights one Over the other
in fore shrouds
To head & Weathermast Ship to
Tack first To Lights on the Ensign Staff
To Alter Course. . .- one Gun & one Gun for one Point
Compass
[242]
AN AMERICAN SEA CAPTAIN IN THE REVOLUTION
Stern & Leew. d mast Ship to Tack
first Three Lights on the Ensign Staff
To Bring too on Larb. d Tack Two Lights on the Ensign Staff
Sail and one false fire
To make after Lying by Two guns a short time after Each
Other
To Speak Four Lights att Mizen Peek
Land or
Discover of any Danger To Show four Lights of Equal
Heights & fire 3 guns
Fogg Signals
To Bring Too on Starb. d Tack. . . . Two Guns
ditto on Larb. d Tack Three Guns
To make Sail after Lying by Four Guns
Discover, of Land or any danger . . Five Guns
Continue of Same Sail Ring of Bells, Beat of Drums &
Fire of Muskets
Transports seperateing from the Convoy must make the Best of their
way & Rendevoris att Townsend
Transports wantig to Speak with the Com m odore must Sett a White
Jack in the Main Shrouds
Nantasket 15 July 1779
D: Saltonstall.
Signals by Night Omitted
To Bring Too on Larb. d Tack. . . . Two Lights on the Ensign Staff
& one False Fire
To Bring Too on Starb. d D. One Light On the Ensign Staff &
one False Fire
[Address on one side of paper]
To
Capt
Luther Little
Sloop
Pidgeon
F243]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
7-'
.._
FHBT SIGNALS OF COMMANDER 8ALTONSTALL FOR THH PBNOBSCOT EXPEDITION,
1779, AS DELIVERED TO CAPTAIN LUTHER LITTLE
Reproduced from the original In the possession of Mr. Luther Little and Misa Joanna Little of Boston
[244]
AN AMERICAN SEA CAPTAIN IN THE REVOLUTION
THE LATTER PART OP COMMANDER SALTONSTALI/8 FLEET SIGNALS, WITH FAC-
SIMILE OF ADDRESS TO CAPTAIN LITTLE, ON BOARD THE " PIGEON "
[245]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
Lisbon Jan.wary Y* 24 th 1780
Honored Sur these are to inform Yoy of Our Misfortin in Being Cast
away Y e 20th of Decemb 1 " Having a Sevear Gail of wind for too days
Before Lying tue under Balence Main Sail at day Lite to our Great
Supprise Saw the Land Gest to Luard Which we had No chance to
Escape the wind Bloing On Shore we then Let Go our anchors in 8
fathums of Water But Y e Cables immeadately parted then Siting Our
fore Staisail to wave in hops to Git into Lisbon as the harbor was in
Site Gest as we wore We Shipt Sea that over Sot us for Severel minuts
till the heave of another Sea Rited us again When we Rited again
Our decks ware Swep Quarter Rails pumps Boat Cabbons and all
hands over Bord But Cetcht by Sum of the Riging that hung to the
Mainmast and fore Topmast Which was Carred away by the heft of
y e Sea We then Sune Struck on Lisbon Bar all hands Lasht to the
Rack But with out hope of Gitting a Shore it Being Low water and
no Land within 2 Mile at hiwater the Brig Stove to peses all Butt ye
Quarter deck and a Small pese of the Starn Which Remained till Low
water we kept Lasht on that and Gest at Sun Set Maid our Escape on
a Reaf of Sand to the fort we all Got Safe to Y e fort and Ware very
kindly Etertarnd By the Portegea Solgers
[Written on inner page]
P S We havent Wanted for Enething Sine we Got Up to Lisbon tho
we have Lost all most Everithing what my fortin is to Be this Year I
Cant tell But i am Shure Tis Bin hard anuf the year Past Capt
oakman And all hands are well and if No other Misfortin hapens I
Expect to Be at home In may for i Expect Cap 1 oakman will Git
Another Wessel in these parts
My Love to All friends So i remain Your
LETTER WRITTEN AT LISBON BY CAPTAIN LUTHER LITTLE TO HIS FATHER, LEMUEL
LITTLE, AT MARSHFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS
Copied from the original In the possession of Mr. Luther Little and Miss Joanna Little of Boston
[246]
I
AN AMERICAN SEA CAPTAIN IN THE REVOLUTION
[Address on outside of folded letter]
To M'
Lemuel Little
In Marshfield
To be Left att Cap 1
Noar Doggedds in Boston
In Y e State of y e Masachusets
Bay New England
[Above the address, and written in reverse position, is written the
following, evidently in Luther Little's hand, but at a later date]
Luther Little Just Lett
8 tizes ( ?)
Amos oakman have
5 pietuns
one tis Ditto
half pistune
[247]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
Boston June 7 1788
Dear Susanna
I inform you by M r Truant, I shall sail to morrow morning having all
things ready for sea, I am bound to the Island martineca and shuld I
meat with markits Shall sell there other wise Shall procead to sum
other Island In the westindis Expect to be gon about three months
I own one Quarter of the cargo and have the consinements of the rest
Besids the consinements of five hundred pounds frate I owe M r
Sargent fifteen pounds fore and Eight pence I have receivd of M r
M c Neal Six pounds on georges account and of M rs Bradford twelve
shillings had paint and oil on his account to the amount of too pounds
twelve Shiling he owes me for crape cushing & gloves Seven shillings
Shuld be glad you would settle the note with him which you have in
your keeping: I have sent you Six pounds By M r Truant, as I have
not time to rite very pertickeler. I can only desire you to give my
respects to the holl of Each of our fammelis and all inquiring friends
LETTER WRITTEN AT BOSTON BY CAPTAIN LUTHER LITTLE TO HIS WIFE, ON THE
EVE OF A VOYAGE TO THE WEST INDIES
Copied from the original in the possession of Mr. Luther Little and Miss Joanna Little of Boston
[Address on outside of folded letter]
Mrs
Susanna Little
Marshfield
hon d By m r
Truant
[248]
AN AMERICAN SEA CAPTAIN IN THE REVOLUTION
Boston Jany 14 1792
Dear Madam I rote to you a fue days a go By Cap 1 Thomas turner
and have sent you my accounts Settled I now inclose you the Vandue
masters account of Beef Sold Bitseye Claps too kags is in it pleas to
Pay hur according as they sold she paying too Shillings for coopring
and repacking and porsheneble part of truckig and vandu masters
commishons as you will Se in the bill, I have Been ready to Sale this
too Days but culd not git out for See but shall Sale to morrow morn-
ing if the wind is fair and the See wil Let us get out am Bound first
to Lisbon and from their to Rusha expect to be Back God willing
next fall give my compliments to Luther and all friends with out
Exceptions hoping I shall find you and all friends well at my return
LETTER FROM CAPTAIN LITTLE AT BOSTON TO HIS WIFE, WRITTEN BEFORE
^ STARTING FOR PORTUGAL AND RUSSIA
Copied from the original in the possession of Mr. Luther Little and Miss Joanna Little of Boston
[Address on outside of folded letter]
[Written on outside of folded letter]
M rs Luther Little
Marshfield
January 14 th 1792
Madam,
by Capt Little's desire, I inform you that he saild this day at
twelve oclock with a fair wind bound for Bilboa
[249]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
Lisbon Febuary 16 th 1792
M rs Susanna Little
Marshfield
Dea r Madam
I inform you by Cap 1 Grin [Green] I arivd of the rock off lisbon in
twenty fore days from Boston, as I rote to you before am now Dis-
chargin the cargo their is no other vessell here with fish: my cargo
sold very well, my cargo will fetch here about 4000 Dollars more than
it cost in Boston I have to Pay thirty Portegeas onboard to work
taking out fish I expect to make on my own fish ov r too hundred and
eighteen dollars more than they cost am bound from here to S l Peters
Berg in rusha with fraigh* Dont expect to be at horn till next October
have a great chance off making considerable by my adventure from
here their I find a great many People here that I new when I was
castayway with Cap 1 Oakman twelve years ago we have the weather
here now as warm as it is in boston in June all kinds off excelent f rute
I like these Voyages so well I think I shall never wan 1 to go in the
westindia trade ene more Brother William is as harty as a buck and I
think will make a good seman Samuel Hall is well like wise indead all
my men wants Ducking more than doctors. I had a Very ruf passage
but Fair winds give my Love to all friends take good care luther dont
git into the Pond or springs I hope to hear Sally is in beter helth tell
Luther his papsey will bring him sum fine things from rusha I never
engoyd beter helth in my life than at present I hope this will find you
and all friends well Give M Compliments to the Reverent William W
Wheler and all Inquiring
LETTER PROM CAPTAIN LITTLE TO HIS WIFE, WRITTEN AT LISBON, PORTUGAL, ON
THE WAY TO RUSSIA
Copied from the original In the possession of Mr. Lather Little and Miss Joanna Little of Boston
[Address on outside of folded letter]
M s Luther Little
M 8 . Luther Little
Marshfield
Hon d by Cap 1 County Plymoth
Grin
Marblehead
[250]
AN AMERICAN SEA CAPTAIN IN THE REVOLUTION
Lisbon February 16 1792
Dear Madam Mrs. Susanna Little Marshfield
I rote to you before from this plase which letter I hope you have
recived : I have been very anchos about you as I left you unwel when
I saild I hope Before this corns to hand you will be in good helth : I
hope to make a good voyage as my Cargo sels for the same prise it
did Last year and everigs more than eney cargo has been sold here this
too months past am like to git a Ceppetil fraigh* for Russia I have
been perfectly well sence I Left Boston and at present all hands are
well onbord I was very much Disopinted in not receving a line from
you by Cap 1 Sevor who ariv d here from Boston a fue days a goo my
love to Luther and all friends
<#**v
ANOTHER LETTER FROM CAPTAIN LITTLE TO HIS WIFE, WRITTEN AT LISBON
Copied from the original in the possession of Mr. Luther Little and Miss Joanna Little of Boston
[Address on outside of folded letter]
M rs
Luther Little
Marshfield
Ship Dispatch
Philadelphia
[251]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
PAC-SIMILE OP A RECORD BY CAPTAIN LUTHER LITTLE OF HIS WOUNDS RECEIVED
IN A VICTORIOUS ENGAGEMENT WITH A BRITISH SHIP DURING THE
REVOLUTIONARY WAR
Reproduced from the original in the possession of Mr. Luther Little and Miss Joanna Little
of Boston
[252]
2
-
DANTE ALIGHIEKI
Trento's monunifiit to Italy's ^rcat poet, ili- forerunner of Milton, who, like Milton, USMM! his
(Soil irivi'ii genius to lift men's mimls to Coil ami His lU-nlin^s \\itli men
, s
2 <jj
"a
Hi*;
Hmillrrtuws of Nutrtg-Jfiti? f ?ara tn
QI0nn?rttnrt an& tip Atttlyrarit? ;
BY
WILLIAM HENRY RICHMOND
[Concluded from The Journal of American History, Volume XI,
Number j]
S I HAVE SAID, I settled in Carbondale in May, 1845,
and later purchased the store building which, as I
have related, was burned in 1855, and the store, now
on the ground, was built, and used from the beginning
of 1856.
On the next lot, adjoining my store property, was
one of the oldest houses in Carbondale, which was
built about 1830. I purchased the house in 1849 and leased it to a
party for a year, reserving rooms which I was to occupy with my
wife, after our marriage. I was married June 5, 1849, to Lois
Roxanna Morss, at the home of her brother, Burton G. Morss, at
Red Falls, Greene County, New York. My wife was the daughter
of Mr. Foster Morss of Windham, Greene County, New York.
On my way to reach Red Falls, being in the city of New York,
the 1st and 2nd of June, I learned from the papers that the first
coinage of gold dollars in the United States had been brought from
the mint to the city of New York on June 1st. I went to Wall Street,
on June 2nd, before leaving for Red Falls, and bought $50 in one-
dollar gold pieces, paying $53 in currency for them. The marriage
fee I paid the clergyman on June 5th was ten gold dollars, perhaps
the first marriage fee paid in gold dollars. I gave a gold dollar to
[257]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
each of Mr. Morss' seven children, and some gold dollars to my wife.
My daughter, Miss Clara Richmond, is the only one now known to
have one of these gold dollars which I gave to my wife.
After the wedding ceremony, Mr. Morss sent us with his car-
riage to the Catskill Mountain House. The second day after we
went down the river in a steamboat and spent a few days in the city
of New York, visiting there noted objects of interest. We climbed
the steeple of Trinity Church to view the city, visited Greenwood
Cemetery in Brooklyn, and went to Barnum's Museum, which was the
most attractive place of its kind to visit at that time.
We went to Morristown, New Jersey, for a Sunday, to attend
the church where Mrs. Richmond's cousin was pastor, the Reverend
Mr. Kirtland. Then we went by steamer to East Haddam, Con-
necticut, located on the Connecticut River, where I had an uncle
living, at Moodus, about four or five miles away. We spent a day
with them, and then my uncle took us in his carriage to East Hamp-
ton, Connecticut, some ten miles away, where another uncle, by mar-
riage to my mother's youngest sister, Mr. Alfred Williams, lived at
that time in the homestead of my maternal grandmother, in that
village, where he had built a commodious house.
There I met also my oldest sister, Harriet, who was two years
my junior, and Mr. George W. Cheney. The two were wedded in
the fall of 1849 and settled in South Manchester, Connecticut, where
he was of the second generation of the Cheney family which com-
menced the silk manufacturing business in 1830.
After a few days at East Hampton we went to my native town
of Marlborough, five miles east, visiting my second oldest sister,
Emily Foote Richmond, who was the wife of William E. Jones of
that town. We spent a Sunday there, being entertained by
friends, &c.
We proceeded thence to Willimantic, by what was called the mail
wagon, as there were no public conveyances to be had. As we drove
up to the Post Office and store building in Hebron, Mr. Buell, who
was Post Master and proprietor of the store, came out to the wagon,
greeted me very cordially, and, after introduction to my wife, asked
me if I were not going down to see Lucy, his wife. I replied:
am with the mail wagon, Mr. Buell. I can't leave that, though I
should be glad to see Lucy." He replied : " Never mind that. I'll
take care of the mail wagon, and of your wife too. You go down
across the Green to the house and see Lucy." I did so, and had a
[258]
RECOLLECTIONS OF NINETY-FIVE YEARS
cordial welcome and chat of ten minutes. She told me some stories
of my boyhood days, of which one was as follows :
She was formerly Lucy Kellogg, sister of my father's partner,
David Kellogg, and lived on an old farm of the Kellogg family, about
three miles from my father's home. In the winter of 1831-1832 I
was sent down to stay with the Kellogg family, to help care for the
stock that was wintered on the farm, and also to attend school in the
brick school-house where I first commenced school. At that time
Mr. Buell was engaged in merchandising, having a large wagon and
a pair of horses which he drove around the country, with many arti-
cles which he supplied to merchants. He was accustomed to make
the Kellogg farm every two weeks, to stay there over Sunday. When
spring came, the wedding of Mr. Buell and Miss Kellogg took place.
It was an evening wedding, and none but immediate relatives were
there. Some came from a distance too far to return that night, so
all the rooms and beds in the house were occupied. Mother Kellogg,
who was then some seventy years old, quietly said to me that I might
get into the rear part of her bed for the night, as my room was to be
occupied. In the morning, when the bridegroom (who had an
impediment in his speech), came down, he greeted me very cordially:
" G-good M-morning, F-f a-ather ! " I soon learned that the family
knew where I had slept ! I had quizzed Mr. Buell during the winter
about his " comin' a-courtin'," but when he said that to me in the
morning I was rather set back.
This was the Mr. Buell who greeted me at the mail wagon. He
and his wife are. long since gone to the Heavenly Home. They left
only one daughter, now living in Hebron, Connecticut, whom I met
a few years ago for the first time. At this time Miss Mary Hall was
with us and wished me to call on a valued friend of hers nearby, by
the name of Bissell. My wife and two daughters were with me at
this time. Mrs. Bissell was somewhat of an invalid. I was seated
by her while my wife and daughters were talking to members of the
family, and soon I learned that Mrs. Bissell was the daughter of Mr.
Harry Hazen. I told her that Mr. Harry Hazen, and his brother,
and a Mr. Peckham conducted a dancing school in Middle Haddam,
Connecticut, in 1835-36, and that I was one of the pupils in that
school, which was quite a surprise to her.
But we must resume the journey. Leaving Hebron we made
Willimantic, where I had an aunt, whose daughter, just of my age,
was wife of Mr. Daniel Lord. We spent a day or so there, and then
[259]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
proceeded by carriage to Norwich, taking the railroad train from
there to Worcester and Boston. We spent some days in Boston,
visiting Bunker Hill, which we climbed to the top, the noted cemetery
of Mt. Auburn, and other places of interest. At the hotel at which
we stopped, the Revere House, on an office counter there was a
basket of extraordinarily nice strawberries, one of which I measured.
It was three and a half inches around, being the first of such dimen-
sions that had come to my notice.
After leaving Boston, we proceeded to Hartford, Connecticut,
arriving on Saturday, I think. That evening we dined at General
Enos H. Buell's, who was formerly of my native town. On Sunday
we attended the Congregational Church, of which the Reverend
Doctor Horace Bushnell was pastor, and he preached the sermon. He
was well known and a man of advanced ideas, which were called in
question by some of his co-religionists.
From Hartford we went down the Connecticut River to the city
of New York, and thence returned to Carbondale. We entered the
house which I had purchased, and boarded with the tenant for a year.
Then we went to regular housekeeping there, until 1874, in September,
when we moved to our house here in Scranton.
My wife, having been born in Windham, Greene County, New
York, she had there many friends and relatives, and in the course of
the years we lived together we had many times driven from Scranton
to that section by horse and carriage. The country between Scranton
and that region has been familiar to me and my family all these years.
I continued my business as a merchant at Carbondale up to 1864,
when my goods were sold to a party, and my store rented. I should
have said that in 1853 I became owner of my partner's interest in all
our business. About 1868 my store building was sold to the firm of
tPascoe, Scurry, and Company, and it is now occupied by a son of
Mr. Scurry.
In 1859 and 1860, I had a contract with the Delaware and
Hudson Canal Company, for building coal cars, for carrying coal
over the gravity railroad to Honesdale. I furnished all material and
wood, with the exception of the axles and wheels. I built some eight
hundred cars, which were used in extending the railroad from
Olyphant to Market Street, Providence.
In December, 1859, I made a verbal arrangement with Mr.
James W. Johnson and Mr. Abel Bennett for lease of coal of the Cen-
tral Coal Company, which lay just east of the present Scranton line,
[260]
RECOLLECTIONS OF NINETY-FIVE YEARS
a tract of about two hundred and fifty acres. I agreed to mine fifty
thousand tons of coal per annum, which was all I could get the Dela-
ware and Hudson Canal Company to promise to take from me. My
landlords wanted to sell more coal from the same land, and made a
verbal arrangement with another party to mine another fifty thou-
sand tons per annum. The coal was to be paid for at twelve and a
half cents a ton in the ground.
We did not get all the preliminaries settled and a written lease
till April, 1860. But I got to opening coal early in January, 1860,
expecting to deliver it to the Delaware and Hudson Canal Company,
after running it over screens and taking out the dirt, just as it came
from the mines.
Mr. Thomas Dickson, on January 1, 1860, had been appointed
by Mr. Charles P. Wurts as manager of the coal department of the
Delaware and Hudson Company. A short time after he came on to
look after the business it was determined by the Delaware and Hud-
son Company that all parties who delivered coal to the Company must
break up the coal and screen it into proper sizes for the market. Up
to this time, all coal as it had gone to tidewater had been sent just as
it came from the mines, only taking out the dust and all sizes below
chestnut. The Delaware, Lackawanna, and Western Company had
commenced breaking the coal and sorting it into sizes a year or two
before.
After this method of breaking the coal was determined upon, I
found that I needed more capital, for I had to put up coal breakers
and machinery for breaking up the coal. I told this to Mr. Charles
P. Wurts, who had then been for some time past the general manager
of the business of the Delaware and Hudson Canal Company in this
section, and had a quarter-interest in a lease made by Jones and Com-
pany, in 1858, or 1859, of lands belonging to Mr. Hull in Olyphant.
After considering the matter of a half -interest with me in the coal
mining, Mr. Wurts replied to me that he had no funds that he could
use at present. But we concluded that our joint names could raise
capital sufficient for the work. The result was that he was my
partner till the latter half of 1863, when I became sole owner. We
commenced mining about the 10th of May, 1860, to deliver coal to the
Delaware and Hudson Company's cars.
We had numerous strikes and troubles with our men, because we
had determined to mine coal by the car, instead of by the ton as it
came out of the mines, which had been the practice of all the mines
[261]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
from Dickson City to Carbondale. The custom, however, at Scran-
ton, and below Scranton, to mine coal by the car had been in practice
for some years. We had contentions all summer, and did not get to
mining thoroughly till fall. Another mine, of much less capacity
than mine was, started by Mr. J. N. Chittenden, was located on the
farm east of that my colliery was on. He had some experience in
mining below Scranton, where they broke up the coal and mined by
the car, and I was governed somewhat by his experience in deciding
whether to mine by car or by ton. During the summer we had
various meetings together to decide how to get business started
properly. Finally I met him at the mines (my home being then at
Carbondale), and told him I was resolved to set the mines at work,
because the losses we were put to by detention would eat up our capital.
He had two Scotchmen, one who took charge inside and one who
took charge outside. They each had a number of boys big enough
to work, and Mr. Chittenden said to me that, whatever I attempted to
do, his men would come over and work for me. I had two Welshmen,
one in charge of the inside work and one in charge of the breaker and
outside work They each had a number of boys able to work. I
told Mr. Chittenden I was going to employ some men up in Carbon-
dale to go to work. Then I got about ten or twelve men, one or two
of whom had been in mines, but mostly wood-choppers. They were
men who did not fear anything. The fact was well known that we
had had trouble in getting our miners to mine by the car.
In those days, at Carbondale, for instance, when a miner was
called upon to do day work, he was paid about $1.12 a day, and the
laborer who worked in the mine with the miner was paid .87*/2 cents
a day. Before attempting to solve the whole question, we tried to get
men to work thus by the day, but enough work was not done by the
day.
Finally, I arranged with Mr. Chittenden for his men, and in
Carbondale I got ten or twelve men. I paid each $2 a day and gave
each man a pistol to protect himself outside the mines, we agreeing
to protect them in the mines. With these men we managed to get
coal out of six or seven chambers the first few days. Soon we added
three or four men more, and the second week still more. Soon we
worked a dozen chambers. The third week the old men began to
come around, ready to work on our basis. By the end of the third
week, we had enough men to get out the quantity of coal we wanted.
Then Mr. Chittenden took his men and opened his mine.
[262]
RECOLLECTIONS OF NINETY-FIVE YEARS
So, after some four months, we got our mines going, mining by
the car, as we had started to do. Men began to work fairly steadily
till the Civil War in 1861. Then a number of men enlisted and there
were a good many interruptions in mining. We sent from Dickson
about fourteen young men. They came up to Carbondale after
enlisting to bid farewell to my family and myself. My wife gave
them luncheon and we had their pictures taken. Some years after
the war I sent them each one of these pictures.
In 1862 and 1863 there was a great deal of trouble with the
" Molly Maguires." We had much trouble with them. One or two
of the men were killed in Olyphant. President Gowan of the Reading
Coal Company had several men convicted in the Courts and they were
hung.
In 1863 Mr. Wurts and I went to Mauch Chunk for the purpose
of reaching Hazleton to examine some coal lands in that vicinity.
Three or four miles from the village of Mauch Chunk coal was
elevated about one hundred feet in distance of less than a quarter of
a mile by a stationary engine, and at the head of the plain from the
valley of the Lehigh a locomotive operated cars as usual into the
valley of Hazleton, where both the Lehigh Valley and the Central
Railroad mined coal. At the time of our visit to that valley in the
middle of 1863, we arrived at the foot of the plain after work for the
day was closed. But as Mr. Wurts was in charge of the Delaware
and Hudson Company it was no trouble to get special arrangements
to take us up that plain and over to Hazleton. After a day or so in
Hazleton, examining some coal mine properties, Mr. Wurts returned
home, and I remained a day or two for further examination of the
mining of the section.
I went one morning in a car from Hazleton to a mine eight miles
away, owned by Mr. Markle, who was related by marriage to Mr.
Pardee, early connected with mining in Hazleton. I spent a few
hours in examining his colliery, etc. He invited me to lunch, and
afterward took me in his carriage to Hazleton. He had had much
trouble with the " Molly Maguires " in his collieries. But he had been
able to learn what they were doing in their secret meetings. On our
way to Hazleton he stopped and pointed to a hole in his buggy top,
where he had been shot at. He said that he had stopped the buggy
and had gone into the woods with his gun, but had found no one.
But afterward he learned who it was.
[263]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
My visit to Hazleton did not result in my then becoming inter-
ested in mines there.
I should have said that when we arrived in Hazleton we made
the acquaintance of the Mr. Calvin Pardee I have referred to. He
was one of the earliest engaged in developing anthracite coal in the
Hazleton region.
After my return we had various experiences in mining coal, the
whole region being unsettled in consequence of the War.
In the winter of 1862-63 we applied to the State Legislature for
an act of incorporation, under the name of the Elk Hill Coal Com-
pany, with a capital of $300,000. Mr. Wurts was made President
of the Company, and I was made Treasurer and General Manager.
Mr. Alfred P. Wurts was made Secretary. Some ten or more years
afterward it became plain that a larger capital under the Company
could be used, and I applied to the Legislature to increase the capital
to $1,200,000, with bond and increased liberties to hold five thousand
acres in any one County in Pennsylvania and any amount of land out-
side of Pennsylvania needed. A few years after, another supplement
was added to the charter, which permitted us to increase our capital
stock and bonds to such amount as was needed to carry on the busi-
ness. In the meantime, in 1864, I had become sole owner of the
property. Mr. Wurts left the employ of the Delaware and Hudson
Company, in 1863, to travel in Europe, etc., and I became the sole
owner of the entire property.
I carried on the coal business up to 1883 at Richmond Colliery
Number 1, when the coal breaker was burned. Believing that the
vein of coal I was mining would not warrant building another breaker
at that time there, I went about three miles into the second ward of
Scranton, and built a shaft and breaker near the Brisbin mine, owned
by the Delaware, Lackawanna, and Western Railroad. This was
known as Richmond Colliery Number 2. I operated that until 1889,
and then sold it. Then I made a lease of coal lands in the first ward
of Scranton, owned by the P. Carter Estate, and erected another
breaker, now known as Richmond Colliery Number 3. This was on
property about a third of a mile above my own home, as at that point
I could reach the Delaware and Hudson Railroad and also the Sus-
quehanna Railroad, less than a mile distant. I had removed from
Carbondale in 1874 to a residence on a seventy-five acre farm, known
as Richmond Hill, in the city of Scranton.
It was necessary to transfer the coal from the shaft on the
[264]
RECOLLECTIONS OF NINETY-FIVE YEARS
P. Carter Estate, a distance of about one mile, by narrow gauge road
on which locomotive and mine cars were used. I met with much
trouble in sinking the shaft on the Carter Estate. At a distance of
ten or fifteen feet from the surface we encountered quicksand, which
we had to go through a distance of thirty or forty feet. We did not
reach the rock above the coal until about a distance of seventy feet.
In sinking through the quicksand we had had trouble on account of
that and the water. This occupied more than a year in completing,
at an expense of over $100,000, while estimates for this work had
been about $15.000 and about quarter the time. My friends had great
anxiety, believing I might sink all I had there.
At the same time this work was going on, Simpson and Watkins,
coal operators, were sinking two shafts in West Pittston, Pennsyl-
vania, where an effort had been made many years before to sink
shafts, and given up because of encountering quicksand. They made
a contract with a firm in New York which had had experience in
sinking shafts by a method of enclosing the space by driving down
pipes and freezing the ground so as to enable them to sink the shafts
in that way. I think these contracts were more than $100,000 for
each shaft, and I believe the time used was as much or more as that
used for my shaft. But we have learned much since that time, and
can now use steel plates around any size shaft we want to make, and
thus penetrate the quicksand with moderate expense.
In 1892 and 1893 I built a fourth colliery and breaker, about five
miles east of Carbondale, on lands belonging to the estate of Mr. G. L.
Morss, about one thousand acres. That colliery was completed and
ready to run on October 1, 1893.
The New York, Ontario, and Western Railroad in 1890 came to
Scranton with their engineer, and for some time were collecting
information as to the propriety of opening a branch road united to
their road at Hancock, New York. Mr. E. B. Sturges, a lawyer, who
had been instrumental in locating the Susquehanna Railroad when it
came into our valley, became interested with the chief engineer of
the New York, Ontario, and Western road, and aided in trying to get
coal operators to put their coal on that road, if it was built. I, like
other operators, was interviewed to see if I would give the promise.
I was then sinking the shaft on the Carter Estate, and Mr. Sturgis
applied to me to agree to put coal from that shaft on this branch road,
if it was built. At times we had a number of talks.
Mr. J. E. Child, who was engineer of the New York, Ontario,
[265]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
and Western Railroad, was in our city, soliciting the coal operators
to give them tonnage. He had started to return to New York, and at
that time had gotten no positive promise from any of the coal
operators. I happened into Mr. Sturges' office and told him that, if
the branch road was built, I would agree to put fifty thousand tons
per annum on it, on the terms they had proposed. Mr. Sturges, being
pleased with this, telegraphed to Mr. Child at Tobyhanna of this
promise, which was the first real encouragement they had had to build
the road. This, with other promises, caused the building of the road
from Scranton to Hancock, where it connected with the New York,
Ontario, and Western line running east and west.
My fourth colliery, known as Richmond Colliery Number 4, built
at what became known as Richmondale, shipped coal by the cars of
the New York, Ontario, and Western Railroad on the branch which
they built. While I operated that breaker and the Richmond Colliery
Number 3 at Dickson City, I was able to ship three hundred thousand
tons or more annually, up to 1899, when I transferred my shares in
the Elk Hill Coal and Iron Company to the Vice-President of the
New York, Ontario, and Western Company. This covered the lease
of my coal interests on the Morss Estate, my store and goods, saw-
mill, some forty odd tenement houses, and all appliances connected
with the colliery and the lease ; also my interest in coal on the Carter
Estate; and the use of the coal breaker at Dickson City, called Rich-
mond Number 3, while they were mining the coal which the lease
covered ; also any coal outside of the lease which they worked through
the breaker, I continuing to have some compensation for their use of it.
Richmond Number 4 breaker adopted a new method of handling
the coal of the mine. I erected a steel shaft about fifty feet square
at base over the shafts sunk some three hundred feet down to the coal.
The shaft was one hundred and eighty-seven feet high and some twelve
or fourteen feet at the landing place of the carriage. We operated
two carriages from the bottom of the mine up to one hundred and
fifty feet above surface. Then, by automatic operation, the car was
tipped, so that the coal went from it into a steel incline which slid
down two hundred and twenty feet to a gate controlled by a man who
fed this coal as proper into a hopper, so that it reached big crushing
rolls, three or four feet in diameter, with teeth for breaking up the
large lumps, etc. Also it went through smaller rolls, until sufficiently
broken to reach the different screens which sifted out the dust and
sorted the coals into various sizes, from grate size, egg size, stove or
[266]
RECOLLECTIONS OF NINETY-FIVE YEARS
range size, chestnut size, and then through different jig or punched
plate screens, with apertures of various sizes, to sort the smaller sizes
of pea, buckwheat, and Numbers 1, 2, and 3 of pea size, the smallest
being rice size. All these smaller sizes have been used for steam
purposes for many years.
This chute was supported by two or more intermediate towers.
The mode of lifting the coal from the mine was by large engines,
having two large drums of some six feet in diameter, on which wire
ropes were used, and attached to the carriages which were lowered
into the shafts on which the mine cars were placed at the foot of the
shaft, the mine cars holding two and a half tons each These cars
with coal were raised to one hundred and fifty feet and the coal
emptied out automatically. The man placed on the tower at that
elevation took the tickets for the mine cars as they came up there, and
controlled the engineer who operated the hoisting engines close to the
breaker, two hundred and twenty feet away. It was practical to raise
three thousand tons or more per day by this one man controlling the
engineer and cars from this platform. The height of the shaft being
one hundred and eighty-seven feet, at near that height were located
two chute wheels, six feet in diameter, over which wire ropes ran and
came down to grade surface, a few feet distant from the shaft, under
a pair of six feet chute wheels located at the grade of the shaft. Then
they followed down to the engine room, where the hoisting engines
and drums were located, and also the engines and machinery to run
the coal breaker .were located just at the rear of the coal breaker. So
these two men did the handling of the coal after it was put on the
carriage down in the mine until it reached the man in charge of the
gate at the foot of the chute where the coal ran from the head of the
shaft to the coal breaker.
After the coal ran through the several rollers, it was crushed
sufficiently, and went into the several screens which sorted it, all
culm being taken away, and it was placed where it could be handled
and taken away from the breaker in some form, no other help being
needed in manipulating the coal except a man in the screen room, who
looked after twenty or thirty boys. These were placed in positions
to watch and pick out all pieces of slate discovered, as it passed by the
boys and went into the several pockets designed to hold the different
sizes of coal. Then at the base of these pockets the large cars which
ran on the railroad, holding, twenty or forty tons or more, were placed
under these pockets and gates, which were controlled by men who
[267]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
loaded the big cars, and the cars loaded went to the scales to be
weighed, and the coal was then ready to go to market.
Other labor-saving operations I conceived and put in practice.
One of these was to elevate the culm to about eighty feet toward the
top of the breaker by ordinary buckets put on ropes. As they came
up, these buckets emptied the material into a hopper in the rear of
which was placed an automatic blowing engine, connected with an
eight-inch pipe in the rear of this hopper. In front of the hopper the
same eight-inch pipe was continued through the breaker building and
supported and extended some two hundred feet from the coal breaker.
The culm was placed in this hopper by a circular movement under the
hopper, so arranged that the culm was not disturbed as deposited.
This took the place of three or four boys and two or three mules to
cart the culm away from the breaker.
Another saving operation was to have a four-inch pipe of iron
running from the breaker, where the culm was deposited, some two
hundred feet to the boiler room, where steam was furnished for carry-
ing on the work. In this pipe we put a quarter-inch steel rope, on
which we had discs, about ten inches apart, fastened, and operated
the rope by machinery in the breaker. It would deposit any amount
of culm needed in front of the boiler for the firemen to use.
These were labor-saving operations, and the colliery was worked
with fewer men than any other that I had acquaintance with.
This colliery, as noted, was transferred to the New York, Ontario,
and Western Railroad interests in 1899. It was run by them until
about 1912, when, by reason of management which may be supposed
not proper, the coal was mined so much under the coal breaker that it
caused the breaker to take a lean, and finally it leaned so much that
the owners thought best to abandon it. The machinery and tower
were removed from the ground.
In speaking of my early days at Marlborough, Connecticut, I
might have said that the schoolhouse which I attended was only about
five hundred feet from where I was born. I commenced to go to
school there before I was three years old, and continued in that school
till I was six years old. The teacher was Ann Pease, and she used to
correct me quite often. Before I was six I used to read in " The
Columbian Orator " and " The Spectator," by standing on a bench and
looking over the heads of the boys in the first class. We studied
[268]
RECOLLECTIONS OF NINETY-FIVE YEARS
reading, writing, spelling, and geography. The books we used were
printed in old style, with long " s's " like " f's." The last year I was
at that school I used to do sewing work, such as hemming towels.
After we moved to the Dean house, I attended the Centre public
school, until I went as clerk in the store at Middle Haddam, in my
thirteenth year.
In the spring of 1837 I returned home from Mr. Whitmore's
employ and attended the public school at the Centre for nearly two
years. I studied arithmetic, grammar, logic, history, and the usual
other studies in an advanced public school. I attempted to study book-
keeping, but this did not amount to much.
My general habit was to apply myself to work, and I had few
holidays. I had no association with young men who spent their time
at clubs or in amusements unfavorable to progress, and I have never
belonged to any society in which it was necessary for me to spend my
evenings away from home.
On arriving in Honesdale, in May, 1842, I was accustomed, as I
had been and as my parents were, to observe the Sabbath Day, and to
attend church. In the fall of 1842 the Reverend Henry A. Roland,
D. D., who had been pastor of the Pearl Street Presbyterian Church
in New York, was called to Honesdale. His ministration was an
active and useful one. In the winter of 1843-44 I became a member
of the Presbyterian Church, professing Jesus as my Saviour and
Redeemer. A large number of others made the change during that
revival.
Doctor Roland remained in Honesdale for some twelve years,
and afterward went to Newark, New Jersey, to the First Presby-
terian Church there, where he remained till his death. He was a
Connecticut man. His son was the famous Professor Roland of Johns
Hopkins University.
My first visit to New York was in 1835, when I went with three
or four older boys for a holiday. We knew a sailor who was in port
then at New York, and who had come from Middle Haddam, and he
showed us around. I arrived in New York the same week as the
great fire of 1835, which burned Wall, William and other streets,
covering a large area, and the timbers were still ablaze when I was
there. I stayed at a boarding house on Park Row.
At this time I went for the first time to the theatre, to hear the
play of " Rob Roy," at the old Park Theatre, on Park Row. I saw
many well-dressed people there, but when I witnessed the stage per-
[269]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
formance, with women dancing, I concluded I did not wish to go to
the theatre any more. I never did, till I took my wife to Barnum's
Museum, when, of course, I must have slipped in to see the perform-
ance. But I never really attended the theatre after going to the Park
Theatre in 1835 till about 1874, when my oldest daughter was at
Vassar College. I used to meet her at the Park Avenue Hotel in
New York often, and she had expressed a wish many times to hear
Booth play. I observed at one time we were there that he was to play,
and I said to her that if she wished to go I would accompany her. In
after years, when my other two daughters were at college, I did the
same with them, and took them to the theatre.
But only once besides have I attended a theatre in all my life.
That was some thirty years ago, while staying at the old St. Nicholas
Hotel in New York, where I had quarters for eight or ten years when
I visited New York. After dinner one evening, meeting Colonel
Henry M. Boise and his wife, of our city, the Colonel said to me:
' We are just ready to go to the theatre, to hear the play, ' Around the
World in Eighty Days/ and won't you go with us? " I replied: " I
do not go to the theatre." But he said, " Yes," and started immedi-
ately for the office to get a ticket for me. So, of course, I went.
After I joined the church I avoided all dancing and card playing,
which before I had done, but only in a moderate way. We have never
practised card playing in our household.
After arriving in Carbondale in 1845, my partner and I soon
made the acquaintance of a retired merchant by the name of Hopkins,
who had discontinued business a few years before on account of ill-
health, and who was then a widower. He invited us to his pew in the
Presbyterian Church. His health failing, he was obliged to discon-
tinue going to church, and we became occupants of his pew by renting
it from year to year, until my partner was married, in the last part of
1847, when he took another pew. I continued to occupy the same
pew, and in 1849 I brought my wife to it, and we retained that same
pew till 1865, when the new church was built, and a choice of pews
sold at auction. I selected one for myself and family and kept it, by
paying a premium over the rent, each year. I kept it a few years,
but, at an annual renting, it was thought by some that I might pay
more to retain my pew than I was paying. By management, between
$50 and $100 were bid, more than I was accustomed to pay, and one
of the elders of the church succeeded in getting my pew, and I had
to take another. But at the next annual sale the pew came back to
[270]
RECOLLECTIONS OF NINETY-FIVE YEARS
me at about the old price, and it was retained by me till we went to
Scranton to live at Richmond Hill, in September, 1874.
After a little time here, we became associated with the First
Presbyterian Church of Scranton. Mr. W. R. Storrs, a member of
that church, and Manager of the Coal Department of the Delaware,
Lackawanna, and Western Railroad, and who was born in Connecti-
cut, near where I was born, attended the church. We selected a pew
just in the rear of his in the church, and Mr. W. F. Halstead, Manager
of the Delaware, Lackawanna, and Western Railroad, was just in
front of Mr. Storrs' pew. This position was held for a number of
years by all of us, and then Mr. Halstead came back in the pew Mr.
Storrs had had, and they exchanged pews. There were one or two
trains that used to pass through Scranton, during church time, and
Mr. Halstead knew when those trains should pass, and used to take
out his watch in church to see whether they were on time.
We kept those seats till the time the new church was built, up in
Olive Street, some twenty odd years ago, where my family now attend.
I did not have much time for reading during the years I was in
business, but when I was a clerk at Honesdale I used to work in the
store till nine or ten at night, and then often spent an hour or so in
reading, especially history and poetry. Some of the works I remem-
ber especially reading then were Milton's " 'Paradise Lost," Young's
" Night Thoughts," Pollock's " Course of Time," Pope's " Essay on
Man," and the works of Sir Walter Scott.
Since I transferred my coal interests to the New York, Ontario,
and Western Railroad, in 1899, I have had no occupation, save to
look after my farm and other interests. For the last ten years we
have spent our winters in the tropics. For the past four years we
have been at Varadero, Cuba, on the peninsula dividing the ocean from
Cardenas Bay, which is about twenty miles long and nine miles across
to Cardenas. The peninsula is about fourteen miles long and at no
point more than a mile across. The principal houses are located close
to the beach, not more than two hundred feet from the water, and at
an elevation of not more than eight or ten feet.
The village has probably not more than one hundred houses. In
the winter simply the plain people live there, who are engaged as
fishermen or in other employments, but during June, July, and August
all the buildings are occupied with families from Cardenas, Matanzas,
and Havana. The population then is a thousand or two, and at times,
when there is a regatta on the bay, many thousands are brought there.
[271]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
We have one other family that has spent three winters there, the
family of Mr. Austin C. Dunham of Hartford, Connecticut, who, two
years ago, became a house and land holder there. He is engaged to
some slight extent in farming and gardening, giving lessons to the
Cuban people in gardening. A few visitors have come to Mr.
Dunham's during the winters he has spent there, and a few visitors
have come to see us there. We occupy a rented house. There are
numerous houses, id'e during the winter months, which can be secured.
The beach on that peninsula is remarkable, not excelled perhaps
by any in the world, the tide rising only three feet. One can walk
out for one hundred feet or more, before the water would rise to above
the arms. The water is pleasant for bathing, except when the waves
are too high. We are never troubled by sharks, although the
youngsters come along the shore sometimes to get their feed from the
numerous small fishes, such as sardines, which are in abundance along
the shore.
We frequently see the steamers, which ply along the sea, eight
or ten miles distant.
I should have said that when my partner and I went into business
in Carbondale we never made any statement to a mercantile agency,
and we never did so afterward in our business. When I became sole
owner of my coal business in 1863 I had never reported to a mercantile
agency or bank as to my financial conditions. Nor have I ever done
so, down to the present time. I have never been under obligation to
speak of my affairs financially, in order to borrow money. When-
ever I have had to borrow money, and could not give some collateral
security, I have ta^ken occasion to solicit the name of a friend on my
paper, to whom I could give some security that was satisfactory.
I have been a fairly consistent member of the Presbyterian
Church, never holding any office in the church except Trustee or
Sunday School Superintendent. I was always a Sunday School
worker, since I joined the Presbyterian Church at Honesdale, and
have always maintained interest in Sunday Schools, as have also my
wife and daughters.
My success in life has been from being trained by faithful parents,
and being taught that the Lord's Day was a day of worship and rest.
I have continued to observe that during all my lifetime. I have
done no labor on the Sabbath Day, except under extraordinary
circumstances. My object in life has been always to follow what tends
to the moral and Christian benefit of mankind.
[272]
PUBLISHED BY
IONAL HISTORICAL SOCIETY
fsmoFTovS
^Tawnnm Wiitoru
.
w
*
t
. -A, *..
'
Journal of Am? rtran
3F0urtl|
lliiliuur X333. 1919
Dniihlr Xuinbcr
, Number 3,
Number 4,
-fiwnnbrr
LONDON b. P. Stevens & Brown
4 Trafalgar Square, W. C.
P ARI8 Brentano's
37, Avenue de 1'Opera
PETROGRAD.
DUBLIN
EDINBURGH.
MADRID.
ROME.
. Combrldge and Company
18 Orafton Street
.Andrew Elliott
17 Princes Street
. Libreria Internaclonal de
Adrian Romo, Alcala 5
. K Piale
1 Piazza di Spagna
CAIRO. . .
BOMBAY.
TOKIO.
MEXICO CITY.
ATHENS. .
BUENOS AYRE8
Watkins and Company
Marskaia No. 36
P. Diemer
Shepheard's Building
Tbacker and Company Limited
Esplanade Road
Methodist Publishing House
2 Sbicbome, Oiz Ginza
American Book and Printing Co.
1st San Francisco No. 12
Const Electheroudakis
Place de la Constitution
John Grant and Son
Calle Cangallo 489
flminuil nf Ammran
3ri> anil 4tlj (f itartera Ntnrtmt Jfinrtmi
VOLUME XIII
JULY- AUGUST SEPTEMBER
OCTOBER-NOVEMBER- DECEMBER
NOS. 3 AND 4
{Iroftnrri hit ahr National ffitulurtral (Eompang, in (Thuirtrrhj iEuitiona.
3Fuur Iliwkfl In tljr Itulumr, at IFoitr Sullarw Amwaliij,
Sailor a QJopu fur giiuUr -Kumbf ru. fur
Nattnnal ^tHtortral
Copyright, 1920, by The National Historical Society
Publication Office: 240 Hamilton Street, Albany, New York. Ira G. Payne, Manager
Editorial Offices: 37 West Thirty-ninth Street, New York
lExmttitt* (HHfirrrH of 2ty* National Editorial UirrrtorB of elje jiuurual
Ijiatririnil &ori*tg of Anwriran
FRANK ALLABEN, President
MABEL T. R. WASHBURN, Secretary
DUDLEY BUTLER, Treasurer
(&rand (Counr.il of
ArhanaaB
PHILANDER KEEP ROOTS
George Washington Memorial As-
sociation
MRS. Louis FLICKINGER
State Recording Secretary Daughters
of the American Revolution
MRS. THOMAS MOSES CORY
Daughters of the American Revolution
(California
ROY MALCOM, A. M., PH. D.
Professor of History, University of
Southern California
MRS. CYRUS WALKER
HONORABLE NATHAN W. BLANCHARD,
A. M. Ex-California Representative
NELSON OSGOOD RHOADES
Mayflower Society, Colonial Wars,
Sons of the Revolution
FRANK ALLABEN, Editor-in-Chief
MABEL T. R. WASHBURN, Genealogical Editor
JOHN FOWLER MITCHELL, JR., Associate Editor
tlj* Ute-prrBiopntB
MRS. J. H. Me EL HINNEY
Daughters of the American Revolution
(ftolorado
MRS. JOHN LLOYD MCNEIL
Past Regent, Colorado, Daughters of
the American Revolution
(Emwrrtirut
Miss ADELINE E. ACKLEY
iintrirt of (Columbia
MRS. HENRY F. DIMOCK
President George Washington Me-
morial Association
CAPTAIN ALBERT HARRISON VAN
DEUSEN
Holland Society, Sons of the Ameri-
can Revolution
[277]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
LEWIS HORN FISHER, LL. M.
Secretary United States Civil Service,
Fourth District
MRS. CLAUDE STELLE TINGLEY, B. S.,
M. A.
SISTER ESTHER CARLOTTA, S. R.
Ex-President Florida Division United
Daughters of the Confederacy
Ijauratt
GEORGE P. CASTLE
WILLIAM D. WESTERVELT
JUtturta
HONORABLE JOHN H. HUNGATF
President First National Bank, La
Harpe
MRS. GEORGE A. LAWRENCE
Honorary State Regent for life, Illi-
nois Daughters of the American
Revolution
MRS. HENRY CLAY PURMORT
Life-Member Society Mayflower
Descendants in Illinois
A. G. ZIMMERMAN, M. D.
Jttftana
JOHN FOWLER MITCHELL
President William Mitchell Printing
Company
HONORABLE GEORGE H. COOPER
Cashier Greenfield Citizens' Bank
lam
SHERMAN IRA POOL
Sons of the American Revolution,
Iowa State Historical Society
EDWIN WELCH BURCH
First President Iowa Baptist Brother-
hood
CHARLES ALEXANDER KEITH, B. A.
OXON.
History and Civics, East Kentucky
Normal School
MRS. WILLIAM H. THOMPSON
Vice-President General, National So-
ciety Daughters of the American
Revolution
Miss MARY NATHALIE BALDY
Miss NELLIE WOODBURY JORDAN
Instructor in History, State Normal
MRS. EDWARD EDES SHEAD
iflarijlaitil
HUGH MACLELLAN SOUTHGATE, B. S.
American Institute Electrical Engi-
neers
JOHN GLENN COOK
ALPHONZO BENJAMIN ^BOWERS, C. E.
President Atlantic Harbor Railroad
Company
HENRY Louis STICK, M. D.
Superintendent Hospital Cottages for
Children, Baldwinsville
J. VAUGHAN DENNETT
New England Historical and Genea-
logical Society
MRS. Louis PRANG
President Roxbury Civic Club
MRS. SARAH BOWMAN VAN NESS
Honorary Life Regent, Lexington,
Daughters of the American Revolu-
tion
Miss CAROLINE BORDEN
Trustee American College, Constan-
tinople
[278]
GRAND COUNCIL OF THE VICE-PRESIDENTS
MRS. CARL F. KAUFMANN
FRANK REED KIM BALL
Society of Colonial Wars, Sons of the
American Revolution
IHtrljujan
FREDERICK W. MAIN, M. D.
Jackson Chamber of Commerce
MRS. JAMES H. CAMPBELL
State President, United States Daugh-
ters of 1812
MRS. FORDYCE HUNTINGTON ROGERS
Ex-Dean Women, Olivet College
MRS. FREDERICK BECKWITH STEVENS
MRS. MARY ELIZABETH BUCKNUM
Minneapolis Chapter, Daughters of
the American Revolution
Miss LUELLA AGNES OWEN
Fellow American Association for the
Advancement of Science and Amer-
ican Geographical Society
T. J. FlTZPATRICK, M. S.
Fellow American Association for the
Advancement of Science
MRS. ERASTUS GAYLORD PUTNAM
Honorary Vice-President General,
National Society Daughters of the
American Revolution
ELEANOR HAINES, M. D.
Life-Member, New Jersey Historical
Society
MRS. JOSEPH DORSETT BEDLE
Past President New Jersey Society
of Colonial Dames
MRS. ORVILLE T. WARING
New Jersey Colonial Dames, New
Jersey Historical Society
MRS. RUTH E. FAIRCHILD
Life-Member Daughters of the Amer-
ican Revolution, Member New Jer-
sey Colonial Dames, Life-Member
New Jersey Historical Society
MRS. JAMES E. POPE
iflrxirn
HON. L. BRADFORD PRINCE, LL. D.
Ex-Governor, President Historical So-
ciety of New Mexico
Xriu fork
REVEREND GEORGE CLARKE HOUGHTON,
D. D.
Society of Colonial Wars, Sons of the
Revolution
CHARLES JACKSON NORTH
Life-Member Buffalo Historical So-
ciety
HENRY E. HUNTINGTON
President Los Angeles Railway Cor-
poration, Society of Colonial Wars,
Sons of the Revolution
JOSEPH A. MCALEENAN
Associate Member Explorers' Club
FRANK JOSEF Louis WOUTERS
President Oleogravure Co., Inc.
OTTO MARC EIDLITZ
Ex-Tenement House Commissioner
MRS. BENJAMIN SILLIMAN CHURCH
Tncorporator and Past Vice-President
Colonial Dames, New York
[279]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
MRS. FREDERICK F. THOMPSON
Vice-President George Washington
Memorial Association
MRS. HENRY FAIRFIELD OSBORN
Philanthropist, Trustee Barnard Col-
lege
MRS. JOHN CARSTENSEN
MRS. ALICE B. TWEEDY
National Society Daughters of the
American Revolution
MRS. MELVILLE AUGUSTUS JOHNSON
Director Onondaga County Historical
Association
MRS. CORNELIA E. S. HOLLEY
Chapin Association
MRS. HENRY A. STRONG
Life-Member George Washington
Memorial Association
Miss MAY OSBORNE
National Society Daughters of the
American Revolution
MRS. VIOLA A. BROMLEY
Fort Greene Chapter, Daughters of
the American Revolution
MRS. W. B. SYLVESTER
Founder and Honorary Regent, Mon-
roe Chapter, Daughters of the
American Revolution
MRS. NELLIS MARATHON RICH
National Society Founders and Pa-
triots of America
MRS. J. HULL BROWNING
MRS. WILLIAM WARD DAKE
Miss MARGARET A. JACKSON
G. ALFRED LAWRENCE, M. D., PH. D.
New York Academy of Medicine,
Sons of the American Revolution
Miss LUCILE THORNTON
CHARLES FREDERICK QUINCY
Chairman, Executive Committee,
American Forestry Association
Daluita
C. HERSCHEL KOYL, PH. D.
Fellow Johns Hopkins University
(ftftP
HONORABLE B. F. WIRT
President Equity Savings and Loan
Company
S. O. RICHARDSON, JR.
Vice-President Libbey Glass Company
MRS. OBED J. WILSON
Life-Member George Washington
Memorial Association
MRS. HOWARD JONES
Life-Member Ohio Archaeological and
Historical Society
MRS. JOHN GATES
Life-Member George Washington
Memorial Association
MRS. JOHN SANBORN CONNER
Life-Member George Washington
Memorial Association
Miss MARIE A. HIBBARD
Daughters of the American Revolu-
tion, Toledo Art Museum Associa-
tion
MRS. GUSSIE DEBENATH OGDEN
Life-Member Mercantile Library, Cin-
cinnati
FREDERICK J. TRUMPOUR
W. B. CARPENTER, M. D.
Sons of the American Revolution,
Vice-President Columbus Mutual
Life Insurance Company
B. F. STRECKER
President The Citizens National Bank
of Marietta
[280]
GRAND COUNCIL OF THE VICE-PRESIDENTS
rrgpn
DAVID N. MOSESSOHN
Lawyer, Publisher and Editor The
Oregon Country
FRANCIS AUGUSTUS LOVELAND
President Chrome and Beck Tanning
Companies
PERCEVAL K. GABLE
JOSEPH J. DESMOND
President Corry Citizens' National
Bank
GEORGE T. BUSH
Life-Member Sons of the Revolution
MRS. FREDERIC PICKETT
Miss MARY MEILY
Jalatti
ALFRED TUCKERMAN, PH. D.
American Association for the Ad-
vancement of Science
Utrginta
MRS. BALDWIN DAY SPILMAN
Past Vice-President General,
tional Society Daughters of the
American Revolution
MRS. LEVIN THOMAS CARTWRIGHT
Virginia Historical Society, Daugh-
ters of the American Revolution,
United Daughters of the Confed-
eracy
Virginia
C. M. BOGER, M. D.
Ex-President International Hahne-
mann Association
MAJOR WILLIAM H. COBB
Director General, Knights of Wash-
ington
MRS. ANDREW M. JOYS
Honorary Life- President, Wisconsin
Chapter, Daughters of Founders
and Patriots of America
EDWIN MONTGOMERY BAILEY
MRS. FRANCES A. BAKER DUNNING
Na- MRS. ALFRED B. SCOTT
of ihr &tat? Aotrtmirg
MRS. PHILLIPS M. CHASE
Society of Colonial Dames
JAM
MRS. SHERMAN IRA POOL
State Historian, Iowa, Daughters of
the American Revolution
IHarglattd
JOHN GLENN COOK
American Association for the Ad-
vancement of Science
ARTHUR F. ESTABROOK
American Academy of Political and
Social Science
CHARLES LYMAN NEWHALL
George Washington Memorial As-
sociation
fork
HONORABLE GEORGE D. EMERSON
Ex-Member New York State Senate
HENRY PARSONS
Military Order of the Loyal Legion
[281]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
MRS. FRANK FOWLER Dow
Regent Irondequoit Chapter Daugh- MRS. CHARLES EDMUND LONGLEY
ters of the American Revolution State Regent, Rhode Island, Daugh-
MRS. GEORGE GEDNEY SANDS ters of the American Revolution
MRS. GEORGE C. CLAUSEN QWaa
ODfyifl MRS. EDWARD ROTAN
FRANK SERVIS MASTEN Daughters of the American Revolution
[282]
of Jtororporation of
National IfiBtoriral
Jnrnrunratrfc nnorr tip UaroH of the SiBtrirt of Columbia
at 9a01?in0ton, on tip uluientg-&ixtlj Sag of April, in tip
fear of dhtr fiord, Ninrtrrn $undrri ano Ififlrru, " Jf nr
tip Jhtruour of Promoting fiatoriral ICnomlrog? ano
JJairuitumt, ano tl|P JJrarr of jRiiihtroiwnpBa among
Nations"
HE NAME by which the Society is to be
known is " The National Historical So-
ciety."
The Society is to continue in perpe-
tuity.
The particular business and objects of
the Society will be:
(a) To discover, procure, preserve, and perpetuate
whatever relates to History, the History of the Western
Hemisphere, the History of the United States of America
and their possessions, and the History of families.
(b) To inculcate and bulwark patriotism, in no par-
tisan, sectional, nor narrowly national sense, but in recog-
nition of man's high obligation toward civic righteousness,
believing that human governments are divinely ordained
to bear the sword and exercise police duty for good against
evil, and not for evil against good, and recognizing, as be-
tween peoples and peoples, that " God has made of one
blood all nations of men."
(c) To provide a national and international patri-
otic clearing-house and historical exchange, promoting by
suitable means helpful forms of communication and co-
operation between all historical organizations, patriotic or-
ders, and kindred societies, local, state, national, and inter-
national, that the usefulness of all may be increased and
their benefits extended toward education and patriotism.
[283]
(d) To promote the work of preserving historic
landmarks and marking historic sites.
(e) To encourage the use of historical themes and
the expression of patriotism in the arts.
(/) In the furtherance of the objects and purposes
of the Society, and not as a commercial business, to acquire
The Journal of American History, and to publish the same
as the official organ of the Society, and to publish or pro-
mote the publication of whatever else may seem advisable
in furtherance of the objects of the Society.
(g) To authorize the organization of members of
the Society, resident in given localities, into associated
branch societies, or chapters of the parent Society, and to
promote by all other suitable means the purpose, objects,
and work of the Society.
The Membership body of The National Historical
Society consists of
(1) Original Founders, contributing five dollars
each to the Founders' Fund, thus enrolling as pioneer
builders of a great National Institution;
(2) Original State Advisory Board Founders, con-
tributing twenty-five dollars each to the Founders' Fund,
from whom are elected the Members of the State Advisory
Boards ;
(3) Original Life-Member Founders, contributing
one hundred dollars each to the Founders' Fund, from
whom are elected for life the members of the Grand Coun-
cil of the Vice-Presidents ;
(4) Patrons, who contribute one thousand dollars
to further the work of the Society ;
(5) Annual Members, who pay two dollars, annual
dues, receiving The Journal of American History.
(6) Sustaining Members, who contribute five dol-
lars, annual dues, receiving The Journal of American
History.
(7) Sustaining Life-Members, who contribute one
hundred dollars annually.
(8) Sustaining Contributors, who contribute an-
nually any sum between five dollars and one hundred
dollars.
[284]
of (Eon!? nta
ROOSEVELT ON HORSEBACK. COPYRIGHT BY G. B. M.
CLINEDENST Front Cover
TITLE-PAGE DESIGN 275
BOARD OF EDITORIAL DIRECTORS AND OFFICIAL
ORGANIZATION 277
ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF THE NATIONAL
HISTORICAL SOCIETY 283
WAR WORK OF THE WOMEN OF ITALY. ENGRAVING.. 289
WASHINGTON CROSSING THE DELAWARE. FROM THE
FAMOUS PAINTING BY EMMANUEL LEUTZE IN THE METRO-
POLITAN MUSEUM OF ART, NEW YORK 292, 293
IN THE TRENTINO VALLARSA VALLEY. ENGRAVING. ... 296
THE THEODORE ROOSEVELT MEMORIAL NUMBER
OF THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY -- The
Editor-in-Chief 297
THEODORE ROOSEVELT The Honorable Elihu Root. ... 299
ROOSEVELT AND THE SQUARE DEAL Colonel William
Boyce Thompson, President of the Roosevelt Memorial Asso-
ciation, Vice-President of the Rocky Mountain Club 304
ROOSEVELT AND THE PUBLIC CONSCIENCE Her-
bert Hoover 309
THEODORE ROOSEVELT, " FIRST AMERICAN OF OUR
DAY " John Hays Hammond, LL. D., President of the
National League of Republican Clubs and of the Rocky
Mountain Club 312
ROOSEVELT'S AMERICANISM The Honorable Alton B.
Parker 314
[285]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
THE AMERICAN LEGION AND AMERICAN PROBLEMS
Colonel Henry D. Lindsley, Commander of the American
Legion 317
PERSONAL MEMORIES OF THEODORE ROOSEVELT-
His Excellency, Jean J. Jusserand, Ambassador from France
to the United States 320
THE PERSONALITY AND THE PHILOSOPHY OF
THEODORE ROOSEVELT - - The Honorable Job Elmer
Hedges, LL. D 326
OUR SOLDIERS AND THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN CLUB -
Major-General David Carey Shanks, Commander of the
Port of Embarkation 335
WORDS FOR OUR TIME AND ALL TIME Theodore
Roosevelt , . 339
TRIBUTES TO ROOSEVELT. MESSAGES RECEIVED BY THE
ROCKY MOUNTAIN CLUB AT ITS FIRST ROOSEVELT DAY
DINNER 341
IS THE NEW LEAGUE OF NATIONS AN INSTRUMENT
OF TYRANNY FOR THE REPRESSION OF HUkAN
LIBERTY? Frank Allaben, President of The National
Historical Society 351
THE ADRIATIC " IRREDENTA " Amy^A. Bernardy,
Litt. D., Universities of Rome and Florence; Writer and
Lecturer on Italian Historical and Sociological Subjects;
War-Time Volunteer Worker in America under the Royal
Italian Embassy : . . 358
POLA, IN ISTRIA. 1. ARCH BUILT BY THE ROMANS. 2.
TEMPLE OF AUGUSTUS. 3. THE ANCIENT ROMAN AMPHI-
THEATRE. ENGRAVING 361
SCENES AT THE ITALIAN FRONT. ENGRAVING 364
SCENES IN TRENTO AND TRIESTE. 1. THE CASTLE OF
BUON CONSIGLIO. 2. THE CATHEDRAL. 3. THE DANTE
MONUMENT. 4. VIEW FROM THE GRAND CANAL, TRIESTE.
5. PANORAMA OF TRENTO. ENGRAVING. 365
[286]
TABLE OF CONTENTS
STRUCTURES IN DALMATIA. 1. COURTYARD OF THE
GOVERNMENT PALACE AT RAGUSA. 2. THE GOLDEN GATE,
SPALATO. 3. THE CATHEDRAL PULPIT, SPALATO. 4. THE
CATHEDRAL AT CATTARA. ENGRAVING 368
ITALIANS IN THE UNITED STATES George Creel,
Formerly Chairman of the Committee on Public Informa-
tion 374
CAVOUR AND THE SLAVS Senator Francesco Ruf f ini,
Minister of Education in the Italian Cabinet That Declared
War ; Rector of the University of Turin ; a Foremost Italian
Authority on International Subjects 375
ITALY'S SOLDIER-POET Luigi Siciliani, Author and Poet. 380
OLD CASTLE GARDEN, NEW YORK. POEM Charles
Nevers Holmes 384
DANTE ALIGHIERI SQUARE IN TRENTO. SHOWING
THE STATUE OF ITALY'S WORLD-FAMOUS POET. ENGRAVING 385
ZARA, REDEEMED CITY OF DALMATIA. 1. INTERIOR
OF ZARA CATHEDRAL. 2. THE CATHEDRAL. 3. A VENE-
TIAN CASTLE AT ARBE, NEAR ZARA. 4. THE CHURCH OF
SAINT GRISQGONO. 5. THE GATE OF THE CITY. 6. COURT-
YARD OF A RESIDENCE. ENGRAVING 388
TRIESTE. 1. THE HARBOR. 2. ARCH OF RICCARDO. 3. DOOR
OF THE CAMPANILE. 4. REMAINS OF ROMAN STRUCTURE IN
THE CAMPANILE, OR BELL-TOWER OF THE CATHEDRAL. EN-
GRAVING 389
BUILDINGS IN TWO DALMATIAN CITIES, SEBENICO
AND TRAU. 1. THE CATHEDRAL AT SEBENICO. 2. THE
CATHEDRAL AT TRAU. 3. CARVING ON SEBENICO CATHE-
DRAL. 4. ENTRANCE TO THE MUNICIPAL BUILDING, TRAU.
5. THE CATHEDRAL DOOR, SEBENICO. ENGRAVING 392
HER MAJESTY, THE QUEEN OF ITALY, IN THE GARB
OF A RED CROSS NURSE. ENGRAVING 393
[287]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
GREAT ITALIANS OF TO-DAY. KING VICTOR EMANUEL
III. QUEEN ELENA, IN THE UNIFORM OF A RED CROSS
NURSE. GENERAL ARMANDO DIAZ. ADMIRAL UMBERTO
CAGNI, GOVERNOR OF FIUME. GENERAL PETITTI Di
RORETTO, GOVERNOR OF TRIESTE. ENGRAVING 396
THREE TRENTINO PATRIOTS MURDERED BY THE
AUSTRIANS. ENGRAVING 397
ORLANDO AND SONNINO FORMER PREMIER AND FOR-
-EIGN MINISTER OF ITALY. ENGRAVING 397
THE CATHEDRAL OF TRENTO. DURING THE WAR THE
AUSTRIANS IMPRISONED BISHOP ENDRICI OF TRENTO FOR
His PATRIOTISM. HE HAS BEEN COMPARED, " FOR NOBILITY
AND LOFTINESS OF CHARACTER," TO THE VALIANT CHRIS-
TIAN HERO, CARDINAL MERCIER. ENGRAVING 400
CASTLE OF BUON CONSIGLIO, TRENTO. ENGRAVING. . 400
THE OLD CHURCH IN MALPAS. SKETCH OF THE OLD
WORLD PARISH CHURCH IN WHICH WORSHIPPED THE
ANCESTORS OF THE AMERICAN STOCKTON FAMILY H. H.
Stockton 401
ADVENTURES OF A GREAT DAY. CELEBRATION OF THE
FIFTIETH ANNIVERSARY OF THE BATTLE OF BUNKER HILL
IN 1825 AS NARRATED IN AN OLD-TIME NEWSPAPER AND
PRESERVED IN AN ANCIENT SCRAP-BOOK Contributed by
Charles Nevers Holmes 406
SYLLABUS AND INDEX, THE JOURNAL OF AMERI-
CAN HISTORY, VOLUME XIII, 1919 413
[288]
[289]
[296]
VOLUME XIII
NINETEEN NINETEEN
NOS. 3 AND 4
3RD AND 4TH QUARTER
il?
Number of Jj? Journal nf
Ammratt Bt0torg
BY
THE EDITOR - IN - CHIEF
CTOBER 27, 1919, the first anniversary of Theodore
Roosevelt's birth which occurred after his death,
became the occasion of spontaneous gatherings
throughout the country to do honor to the memory
of this great, virile American. Undoubtedly the most
notable of these gatherings was the dinner given at
the Waldorf-Astoria, New York, on the evening of
Roosevelt's birthday anniversary, by the Rocky Mountain Club of
New York an organization of Western men in New York which is
rendering conspicuous service by its patriotic activities.
The members of the Club and their guests, the writer having the
honor of being one, filled the grand ballroom of the hotel, and
[297]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
listened to a remarkable series of addresses on Theodore Roosevelt
and his relation to America, delivered by Honorable Elihu Root, his
Excellency, the French Ambassador, Mr. John Hays Hammond,
President of the Rocky Mountain Club, Colonel William Boyce
Thompson, Vice-President of the Club and President of the Roose-
velt Memorial Association, Mr. Herbert Hoover, distinguished mem-
ber of the Club and guest of honor on the occasion, Honorable Alton
B. Parker, toast-master for the evening, Major-General Daniel G.
Shanks, the Reverend William T. Manning, D. D., Rector of Trinity
Church, New York, Colonel Henry D. Lindsley, head of the Ameri-
can Legion, and Honorable Job E. Hedges.
The addresses were of such permanent interest, and so timely
in interpreting and applying Theodore Roosevelt's life and principles
to the problem of radicalism and unrest now confronting our country,
that we give entire these expositions of Americanism in the pages
which follow.
Americanism the priceless heritage of the true principles of
righteous government handed down to us by our fathers is at this
moment like a great continent of hope for the world, towering above
the lashing seas of class-hatred and revolutionary violence. It is an
hour when every patriot should instruct his own soul in the divine
foundations underlying Americanism, that his mind may be armed for
defense of the principles indispensable to all government of, by, and
for the people.
[298]
BY
THE HONORABLE ELIHU ROOT
HEN Colonel Thompson asked me to come here and say
a few words, a very few words, about Theodore
Roosevelt, upon his birthday, it seemed to me very
appropriate, for the great mountains from which you
draw your inspiration as a society were to him, next
to his home, the dearest place in the world. Like
Antaeus of the Greek fable, there he renewed his
matchless energy by the touch of Mother Earth. He loved every peak
and plain and valley, from the Bad Lands to the Flat Tops.
He loved the brave and simple people of the mountains, he knew
them, he respected them, and he prized the influence of their lives
upon his. So many of us loved him ! The mystic chords of memory
draw the hearts of so many of us back to that life so magnanimous,
so kindly, so affectionate, so appealing to the best in all our natures
so full of genuine interest in our fortunes, so appreciative of what
was good in us, so kindly and considerate of our failings! We love
him ! We could not celebrate his birthday as we do were it not for our
deep affection. But, that is not the cause of our gathering. He ren-
dered great service, he did great deeds for us and for our country.
With the swift intuitions in which he surpassed all men of his time
he pierced through the complications and uncertainties of political
and economic life to the fundamental principles upon which rest our
whole political and social system, the fundamental truths which under-
lie American institutions and which underlie all government of Justice
and of Liberty. He saw that in the marvelous development of human
wealth and human power to produce wealth we had gradually slipped
away from the old, simple relations of equality among our people, that
a crust was forming of power and privilege and superiority based
upon wealth, and a steadily, certainly growing discontent was making:
[299]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
its way among the people of our country. And he undertook, though
there was no crisis, to make one, and to bring the people of America
back to the supremacy of law for liberty. The millions who were
beginning to feel that our free institutions were failing he taught to
understand that there was a remedy by law, and he forced a passage
through the difficulties, doubts and obstacles for law and for the
application of the great principles of free government through law;
and in order to prevent revolution, he went up and down the land,
preaching the principles of justice and freedom not merely solving
particular questions of corporations and trusts and the use of capital,
but laying down the rules by which all questions for all time must be
solved in a free, democratic government. With unthinking and
instant courage, he declared in clear tones heard throughout the land,
"All must obey the law. Wealth must obey the law. Labor must
obey the law." He flinched from no power, from no political power,
from no social power, in the just and equal and uncompromising asser-
tion of principles of American liberty and justice for rich and poor,
for capital and labor, for the great and for the weak.
Where would we be now, called upon as we are to deal with the
grave and terrible questions that are before us, if Theodore Roose-
velt had not restored to the plain people of the United States, the
men and women of small means, of simple lives, confidence in our
institutions, an abiding faith in the capacity of our democracy to
maintain the equality of independent manhood among rich and poor
alike ?
Where would we have been in those fateful days when the people
of the United States were called upon to gird themselves anew and
offer their fortunes, their lives, their dearest affections, in terrible war
for the preservation of our liberty, if Theodore Roosevelt had not
been able to appeal to the affection and the confidence and the trust of
the American people for a system of free institutions in which we had
taught them to believe ? But as it is not for our affection, so it is not
for his deeds that we are now met to honor him. He did more than
to solve the questions of his time. He presented to our country and to
the world a great and inspiring example to enforce his teaching ; it is
not what he did, but what he became. The man was the spirit he
worked in.
[300]
THEODORE ROOSEVELT
Sermons are forgotten ; men are remembered. Truths are told in
ten thousand volumes and pamphlets, from a thousand pulpits and
rostrums. They are forgotten. For a moment they enter the mind,
and in a moment they are displaced. But the perpetual lesson of a
great example, inseparably united to "a great truth, carries on the
work of a lifetime through generations and ages to come.
And this example is one which appeals so readily to all. Every
American boy can be Theodore Roosevelt's follower. He was not
different, not some strange phenomenon unlike the rest of us. He was
like us all, only more so. There was, as the French Ambassador has
said, radium in the clay of which he was fashioned, that carried to the
nth power every great purpose, every noble conception, every deep
truth that possessed him.
Every Boy Scout may imitate him. He was strong, powerful, but
he began weak and puny. He trained himself to strength and power.
So can all American boys. He was born and bred under the dis-
advantages of wealth and fashion, with the paving stones of a city
between him and the earth. He broke over the barriers and became
the friend of every farmer, of every ranchman, of every huntsman,
of every laborer, of every good and true man and woman in this great
land. No pent-up city, no learned institution, no social convention
restrained his universal and mighty sympathy. He trained himself to
the habit of courage. So can every American boy. From the habit of
courage came the natural reaction of truth. That is within the grasp
of every American boy. He was sincere and simple, not ornate and
florid. He spoke not the tongue of the poet or the philosopher. He
had not what Macaulay credited to Gladstone, " a command of a
kind of language, grave and majestic, but of vague and doubtful
import." No one ever misunderstood what Theodore Roosevelt said.
No one ever doubted what Theodore Roosevelt meant. No one ever
doubted that what he said he believed, he intended and he would do.
He was a man not of sentiment or expression, but of feeling and of
action.
His proposals were always tied to action. He uttered no fine
sentence, satisfied that that was the end, the thing accomplished.
His words were always the precursors of effective action. He culti-
vated promptness in action until it became his natural reaction and
[301]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
made him an almost perfect executive not an administrator, but an
executive gifted with the power of swift and unerring decision. Yet
he was as free from self-conceit as any man I ever knew. His con-
sciousness of strength was in the strength of his purpose, in the
cause he advocated, and not at all in his own merits. He was as
modest as a girl about himself. He was the most hospitable to advice
of any man I ever knew. He was eager for knowledge. He thirsted
for knowledge, and in the performance of his public duties he sought
everywhere from all manner of men, to know their thought, their
contribution of information. He talked little about common counsel,
but he practiced it universally and always, and he did come to know
the very heart of the American people by actual contact. He was no
unapproachable genius, unlike everyone else.
He did not originate great new truths, but he drove old fundamen-
tal truths into the minds and the hearts of his people so that they stuck
and dominated. Old truths he insisted upon, enlarged upon, repeated
over and over in many ways with quaint and interesting and attractive
forms of expression, never straining for novelty or for originality,
but always driving, driving home the deep fundamental truths of
public life, of a great self-governing democracy, the eternal truths
upon which justice and liberty must depend among men. Savonarola
originated no truths, nor Luther, nor Wesley, nor any of the flam-
ing swords that cut into the consciousness of mankind with the old
truths that had been overlooked by indifference and error, wrong-
heartedness and wrong-headedness. Review the roster of the few
great men of history, our own history, the history of the world; and
when you have finished the review, you will find that Theodore Roose-
velt was the greatest teacher of the essentials of popular self-govern-
ment the world has ever known.
What we are here for is to perpetuate that teaching, lift it up.
striking the imagination, enlisting the interests of the country and
the world, by signally perpetuating the memory of our friend, the
great teacher.
The future of our country will depend upon having men, real men
of sincerity and truth, of unshakable conviction, of power, of per-
sonality, with the spirit of Justice and the fighting spirit through all
the generations; and the mightiest service that can be seen today to
[302]
THEODORE ROOSEVELT
accomplish that for our country is to make it impossible that Theodore
Roosevelt, his teaching and his personality, shall be forgotten. Oh,
that we might have him with us now !
Be it our duty and our privilege, in our weak and humble way, to
keep him with us, to keep him with our country in all the trials before
it, and so pay to him the honor that he coveted most, the highest
accomplishment of his noble and patriotic purpose.
[303]
tlf?
leal
BY
COLONEL WILLIAM BOYCE THOMPSON
President of the Roosevelt Memorial Association, Vice-President of
the Rocky Mountain Club
E members of the Rocky Mountain Club are, as our
name indicates, men of the great West. We come
from a region which even now is sparsely settled, a
country of enormous distances, where men who live
a hundred miles apart consider themselves neighbors,
and where the customs and habits of thought of the
frontier to a large extent still prevail. On the fron-
tier there are tall men and short men, good men and bad men and
when you've said that you've said all there is to say about the frontier's
social distinctions. In a sense we all sleep under the same blanket out
there yet ; we drink out of the same cup.
Perhaps it is because Theodore Roosevelt, when he was a ranch-
man in Dakota, slipped so readily into the frontier point of view, that
the men of the West feel that he belonged peculiarly to them. The
West has always loved T. R. The men of the West ever responded to
him with a sympathetic understanding which the men of scarcely
any other part of the country equalled and certainly none surpassed.
" This man," they said, " is like one of us. He is a neighbor. He is
a real human being. He is what we call an American. That is, he
is like the fellows we know." They felt that he was for America, first,
last and always. They felt that in office and out of office he was work-
ing for them, who were just ordinary American citizens. They felt
that, in every way possible, he was seeking to make the resources of
the nation accessible to all the people. He did not promise to make
everybody rich; he did not promise to make everybody happy. He
did promise to give everybody a " square deal." That is the reason
why we men of the West loved Theodore Roosevelt.
[304]
ROOSEVELT AND THE SQUARE DEAL
Roosevelt stood for the " square deal; " he preached the " square
deal ; " in office and out of office he practiced the " square deal." The
American people loved him because of it; but I do not believe that
many of them ever realized how scrupulously careful he was, in deal-
ing with the great issues before the country, to be just to all the
elements involved.
When Roosevelt came to the Presidency, he saw at once that
capital and labor were drawing too far apart. He made up his mind
that he would try to pull both capital and labor back from the way in
which they were going and, if he could, make them walk along the
middle road of safety.
"This is not and never shall be a government of a plutocracy,"
he declared. " It is not and never shall be a government by a mob.
It is as it has been and as it will be a government in which every honest
man, every decent man, be he employer or employed, wage worker*
mechanic, banker, lawyer, farmer, be he who he may, if he acts
squarely and fairly, if he does his duty by his neighbor and the State,
receives the full protection of the law and is given the amplest chance
to exercise the ability that there is within him, alone or in combina-
tion with his fellows as he desires."
In another speech he said:
" We need to keep ever in mind that he is the worst enemy of this
country who would strive to separate its people along the lines of
section against section, of creed against creed, or of class against
class. There are two sides to that. It is a base and an infamous thing
for the man of means to act in a spirit of arrogant and brutal dis-
regard of right toward his fellow who has less means; and it is no
less infamous, no less base, to act in a spirit of rancor, envy and hatred
against the man of greater means, merely because of his greater
means."
In trips over the country, first through New England, then to the
South, then to the West, Roosevelt cried out to capital and cried out to
labor to remember that before a man is a capitalist or a laboring man.
he is a citizen of the Republic :
" We must act upon the motto of all for each and each for all.
There must be ever present in our minds the fundamental truth that
in a republic such as ours the only safety is to stand neither for nor
[305]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
against any man because he is rich or because he is poor, because he
is engaged in one occupation or another, because he works with his
brains or because he works with his hands. We must treat each man
on his worth and merits as a man. We must see that each is given a
square deal, because he is entitled to no more and should receive no
less. Finally we must keep ever in mind that a republic such as ours
can exist only by virtue of the orderly liberty which comes through
the equal domination of the law over all men alike, and through its
administration in such resolute and fearless fashion as shall teach
all that no man is above it and no man below it."
In all his speeches at the time he was scrupulously careful, in
pointing out the virtues and the faults of one side, to point out with
precisely the same vigor and incisiveness the virtues and the faults of
the other. One day at the White House, in a dramatic manner he
made his position clear and unmistakable.
A number of " labormen " were lunching with him, and one of
them said, "At last, Mr. Roosevelt, there is a hearing for us fellows."
" Yes ! " cried the President emphatically. " The White House
door, while I am here, shall swing open as easily for the labor man
as for the capitalist and no easier."
There, in a nutshell, was Theodore Roosevelt's doctrine of the
" square deal." He lived up to it conscientiously all his life and
because he did live up to it and because the American people felt that
he lived up to it, men, women and children all over the country are
coming together during these days to do him honor. Ten months
after his death, his name is greeted with the same roar of cheers it
evoked during his lifetime. Last year, it was a man who was cheered ;
today it is the principles for which that man stood. Vaguely the
American people begin to recognize that the forces of conciliation to
which Roosevelt appealed almost twenty years ago must aid us today
in solving the social and industrial problems that confront the world.
Roosevelt inaugurated a " get together " movement which, in spite
of setbacks, in spite of disappointing defeats, has progressed and will
continue to progress. At the time we did not comprehend the magni-
tude of the great bringing together of men of all ranks, all creeds, all
stations in life, under the inspiration of Theodore Roosevelt's appeal
[306]
ROOSEVELT AND THE SQUARE DEAL
ticians of all parties, all men and women who love America, will
do well to give heed to the evidences of the devotion of the American
people to the memory of Theodore Roosevelt. This devotion is only
the expression of their own passion for justice and straight dealing.
A word about the Roosevelt Memorial Association. I looked
over a number of telegrams received today just before I left the office,
and I will quote from some. We have word from all over the United
States that churches of all denominations and creeds had Roosevelt
services yesterday. I do not believe that I exaggerate when I say that
two hundred thousand meetings are being held today in this country
by people assembled in school-houses, halls, and at dinners in honor of
Theodore Roosevelt.
From the national headquarters, we have supplied over 8000
speakers, and this does not count the speakers that are supplied by the
States and local speakers. Telegrams are pouring in from every-
where.
Oregon wires " 300 grade schools and high schools and 3000
district schools are holding Roosevelt meetings today. 400 cities and
villages will have meetings tonight"
Georgia wires " One county in Georgia that we gave a quota
of $200 has raised over $4000."
Illinois wires " 1,950,000 school children in Illinois are today
observing Roosevelt's birthday."
Utah wires - " 450 schools observe memorial exercises. 100
meetings will be held in Utah tonight."
New Mexico wires " Every school in the State holds Roosevelt
memorial meetings today. Every city and village in New Mexico
holds memorial meetings tonight."
Connecticut wires " Today 42% of undergraduates of Yale
University have been enrolled as members of the association."
South Dakota wires " 6000 schools in South Dakota are hold-
ing Roosevelt exercises today."
North Dakota wires " 300 Roosevelt meetings will be held in
Dakota tonight."
Ohio wires " Every county, city, community and school in the
State of Ohio will celebrate Roosevelt birthday. 1,036,000 school
children in 5200 schools in the State will be inspired by lessons on
[307]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
for a " square deal." We are just beginning to understand it. Poli-
Roosevelt's life today."
California wires " 2500 members enrolled. Roosevelt
Memorial Association will have 7500 California members before
November 1st."
Austin Colgate, chairman of New Jersey, wires " 60,000 mem-
bers have been enrolled in New Jersey. By tonight 1,000,000 men,
women and children will have attended memorial meetings in New
Jersey."
Panama cables - " Up to noon today have received subscriptions
for over $5000."
Nelson Gay, Chairman of the Roosevelt Memorial Committee in
Italy, cables from Rome : :< Permit me to join with America in
honoring memory of Roosevelt. He united in himself those personal
and civic virtues which are universal in character and which win
admiration of people of every race. More than statesman, he was the
man. For the moral, mental and political force of this virile cham-
pion of American civilization all citizens of the world hold a common
feeling of respect and admiration."
The Mayor of Rome, Adolfo Appolloni, cables : ' I knew the
man, and admired him. He had a strong will, and labored always
for the common good. He loved his country and honored Italy, and
to him who had the Roman spirit, Rome bows in reverence."
I am in receipt of the following cable from Marshal Joffre:
" Very happy to attest, on the occasion of Theodore Roosevelt's birth
anniversary, my warm admiration for his energy and elevation of
character."
I am in receipt of the following cable from Marshal Foch : " I
can never forget the sentiment which inspired Col. Roosevelt in
regard to the French people. His memory will always be fresh in the
hearts of Frenchmen. Therefore I take this opportunity to express
to you my deepest sympathies."
[308]
auii thr }J uhltr (Cnusrirurr
BY
HERBERT HOOVER
BELONG to that generation who do not go back far
with Theodore Roosevelt's life. My contact with him
came first in January, 1917. As your Chairman has
said, the Belgian Relief was founded in an attempt to
save the lives of ten million people condemned to star-
vation by an outrageous invasion. It has been sup-
ported in its first few months by the outpouring of the
charity of the world. At its point of collapse, the governments of
France and England had saved it from bankruptcy by pouring out
from their already overburdened treasuries over three hundred mil-
lions of dollars. At the latter part of 1916, it became evident that these
overtaxed governments could not go on indefinitely providing huge
sums of money for expenditure in the United States for food. Their
own difficulties were becoming overwhelming; and with that depres-
sion of heart I came to the United States, to see what large support I
could secure from my own country. The day after my arrival I called
upon the leading citizen of New York and of the United States. I
found I had to make no plea to Theodore Roosevelt. He cut short the
statement that I entered upon with the words, " Young man, the $150,-
000,000 that you ask for is no tax on the American people to save the
lives of ten millions of people. That can be found and you need have
no fear."
My second contact was with my friend Colonel Thompson, who
attended to my immediate needs; and my third contact was with my
fellow members of this club. Some of you will recall that at that time
you had raised a considerable fund for the erection of a club house
and that fund was assured to me the third day after my arrival in
New York. That club house has never been built, but you have built
[309]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
something infinitely more precious than a mere dwelling. That the
American people did undertake the burden of Belgium, needs no
proof beyond the $300,000,000 that our government poured into the
Belgian Relief before their redemption.
It is not alone in his benevolence, his inspiration and his con-
stancy in aid that I came to appreciate Theodore Roosevelt. Those of
us who have lived among, who have had to deal with, the flames of
revolution during the last ten months, who have had to witness the
causes which have led to this cataclysm, appreciate probably more
than any other that it is due to Theodore Roosevelt that this country
is not today in those flames. The insistence on a square deal in
citizenship, amongst a people steeped in cynical materialism a score of
years ago, laid the foundations upon which our safety lies at this
moment. To Theodore Roosevelt is due that awakening of public
conscience which has enabled us to preserve our institutions to this
moment ; and if we can maintain that, there can be no question of their
survival. The years ahead of us will be the most solemn in our
history. The heart of the world has been stirred, by social, political
and economic wrong and inequality. Our institutions are yet again to
be put to the test, to a full test of their righteousness. They have
survived all tests for 150 years, and if in these next few months we
can preserve the spirit of Theodore Roosevelt, they will yet survive.
We are in one of those times of hysteria, of extremists, both in
politics and in economics. We are oppressed with phrase-makers,
who would solve our national politics with phrases Bolshevism,
Socialism, trades unionism, internationalism, capitalism, and a hun-
dred others. Either goverment or gospel by isms or phrases is the
negation of straight thinking. Today men are undertaking great
solutions on reckless " hunches " and by playing poker with the fate
of people.
We have seen in the last few days the failure of an attempt to
solve one of the greatest problems in the front of the world, the
problem of industrial relations. Perhaps that failure really lies
because we have not paid regard to those truths that Theodore Roose-
velt thundered in the ears of our people over the last twenty years.
We have summoned a few men in the belief that social diseases can
be cured by negotiation, on the assumption that we can stimulate
[310]
ROOSEVELT AND THE PUBLIC CONSCIENCE
class consciousness in a country where there should be no classes,
and then find a solution to its untoward results by creating some sort
of automatic machinery for an armistice between battles.
We have got to go deeper if we are not to be dominated by the
imported disintegrating social theories of Europe. We must diagnose
the roots and the causes of this infection. We must impose a con-
structive social hygiene of our own, and if need be, we must impose a
surgical operation. That social ideal that we now need lies deep in the
heart of the American people. It is the social ideal of Theodore
Roosevelt. It is the simple ideal of equality of opportunity. It is tlie
same old theme which this nation was founded to perfect, and the
same theme that received a regeneration at the hands of our friend.
Perfection has not come to the world in even 150 years, and the
development of our institutions and our prosperity needs np other
philosophy, but it needs the study of its application, and it needs its
execution.
The heart of the American people is as sound today as it was
when it was awakened to its responsibilities by Theodore Roosevelt.
We have a debt of gratitude to pay to him for the awakening of a
public conscience that will in itself find a solution of the difficulties
that now confront us.
[311]
Ammnm at
ft
BY
JOHN HAYS HAMMOND, LL.D.
President of the National League of Republican Clubs and of the
Rocky Mountain Club
E meet today, the 27th of October, to celebrate the anni-
versary of the last of the trio of immortal Presidents.
Such high place in the temple of famous Statesmen
can rightly be accorded to Theodore Roosevelt.
Despite the lack of time necessary to assuage the
asperity inseparable from a militant political career,
and such, thank God, was his, Theodore Roosevelt is
already acclaimed as one of the greatest of our greater American
Presidents. Men of all parties and factions, at home and abroad,
men of all races and creeds so broad were his sympathies vie in
their zeal to pay homage to his memory.
To Theodore Roosevelt there could be no more gratifying tribute
than to be already recognized by his countrymen as worthy to be
named with Washington and Lincoln. Doubtless he differed from
these two great Presidents in temperament and in method, but alike,
they were sent by Divine Providence to inspire hope and confidence
in faltering hearts, to arouse their apathetic countrymen to patriotic
action, and to become leaders, each in the particular National crisis
with which his name will ever be associated in American history.
Washington came to overthrow the political and militant forces
which kept us a subject people and to create a nation destined to exert
a mighty influence for the welfare of mankind ; Lincoln came to save
the Union ; and finally Roosevelt, a young Lochinvar from out of our
own great West, imbued with its spirit of true Americanism, came to
[312]
FIRST AMERICAN OF OUR DAY "
inculcate the duty and responsibility, as well as the rights of Ameri-
can citizenship, to urge the development of a virile American man-
hood and to make ours a self-respecting nation at home and a nation
respected everywhere. If Washington was the father of his country,
if Lincoln was the great Emancipator, Roosevelt was pre-eminently
the first American of our day for us and for the world.
The Rocky Mountain Club is proud of the fact, and it is a
justifiable pride, that it numbers in its membership many worthy
sons of those intrepid pioneers who blazed the way for civilization
through the vast wildernesses of the far West. It is proud too that
many of its members are leaders in the development of the natural
resources of that great region, which has contributed in a large
measure to the industrial supremacy of our Nation. At the organiza-
tion of the Rocky Mountain Club, 12 years ago, Theodore Roose-
velt, then President of the United States, expressed his deep apprecia-
tion of honor, as he termed it, to be elected an honorary member of
the Club, and from that day up to his untimely and lamented death,
he evinced a keen interest in the civic activities of the Club. He
believed that the Rocky Mountain Club, more successfully than any
other organization, aimed to perpetuate the traditions of that great
section for which he had so profound an affection and to create in
the political and civic life of our country an appreciation of those
ideals of which Theodore Roosevelt, in his own life, was a conspicuous
personification. Therefore, it is alike the duty and the inspiration of
the Rocky Mountain Club to commemorate the anniversary of his
birth with proper demonstration of deep affection and high regard
for the man above all others who was the exponent of the ideals for
the observance of which this Club was organized, and the Governors
of the Club have under consideration the selection of Roosevelt Day
as the date of its future annual meetings.
It is a matter of pride and gratification to the Rocky Mountain
Club, that in connection with the Roosevelt Memorial, such generous
and efficient service has been rendered by our public-spirited and
honored Vice-President, Colonel William Boyce Thompson.
[313]
'H Ammrantfim
BY
THE HONORABLE ALTON B. PARKER
ESTEEM it a very great privilege to preside tonight
and I am very grateful to the Rocky Mountain Club
and to that exceedingly kindhearted President of
yours for stepping one side to give me the opportunity
to greet the members of the club on this very interest-
ing occasion. I shall not take your time in considering
the services of Colonel Roosevelt as President of the
United States. They have already been spoken of most felicitously by
your President. They will a little later be treated, I assume, by his
Secretary of State, the Honorable Elihu Root.
I shall content myself with a little more than a sentence on that
subject. You and I know that very many of the Presidents of the
past, good Presidents, who have served their country faithfully, are
but little spoken of or thought of by the great body of the American
people. This is not because they did not do their duty as they found it,
day by day, and do it well ; it is because there was no crisis, no great
situation which they had to meet as Lincoln met the effort to destroy
the Union.
In Colonel Roosevelt's case, he did not face a great crisis, and yet
he served the people of the United States in the absence of a great
crisis, with such vigor, with such sound judgment, that none of us
doubts not for a moment that had he been confronted with a
crisis like that which confronted Lincoln he would have been entirely
equal to the situation, as Lincoln was.
But I want to say a few words tonight, with your permission,
about his services as a private citizen, after he had given his best to
the people of the United States as President. He was the greatest
preacher of preparedness and Americanism of his generation, aye, of
all generations from the dawn of the republic down to this day.
[314]
ROOSEVELT S AMERICANISM
Nearly all of you marched up from Wall Street with 145,000 men
for the purpose of rousing the people of the United States to make
ready. You marched because you wanted to help swell that great
mass of marching and intelligent men. 145,000, remember, is a
greater number of men than ever marched together at one time in
the history of the United States before or since and it had its effect.
All over the country meetings began to be held, and the purpose was
to bring pressure upon Congress to the end that it might make ready
for what the most of you thought quite likely, our entry into the world
war. And yet the voice that more than any other voice aye, in my
judgment, more than all other voices stirred you, and set you and
all your fellow-citizens here at work for the purpose of arousing the
people of the United States to the end that they might demand of
Congress that we prepare, was the voice of Colonel Roosevelt.
And as for Americanism, why, when did he not preach it and
effectively preach it? I want to call your attention tonight to one
sentence of his, and the wisdom of it will appear at once upon its
reading. We are all so full of the facts that have been borne in upon
us in the last few days in this country that we can understand and
appreciate just what he was aiming at, what he was trying to make
the people of the United States see, although they did not see it clearly
enough to make it effective. He said, speaking of immigrants, " We
cannot have too many of them of the right type, the type that is
morally, physically, economically right. We should not have any at
all of the. wrong type. We should not admit them simply because
there is a need of labor. Better go slow on labor than to bring
improper men into the body of our citizenship, to dilute it, that citizen-
ship into which our children are to enter."
" In practice," he continued, " it is not easy to apply exactly the
proper tests ; but fundamentally our aim should be to admit only immi-
grants whose grandchildren will be fit to intermarry with our grand-
children, with the grandchildren of the Americans of today." The
American people heard and applauded the wisdom of this sound
advice, given by their favorite son, but took no steps, unfortunately,
to make their approval known to Congress. Congress probably heard
it, too, but unfortunately, too, took no action. What a pity that his
advice was not accepted at once and made effective by statute and an
\
[315]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
organization to carry it out ! We know now that this fair land of ours,
which has been made to blossom as the rose, principally by the hard
work and thrift of generations of Americans, is now coveted by the
Anarchists, Bolshevists, I. W. W.'s and criminal broods of other
names who have come to us by the hundreds of thousands from other
countries. Myriads more of the same general type are ready and
waiting to come as soon as passage can be obtained in order to join
their criminal brethren in their ambitious attempt to overthrow the
best Government the sun ever shone upon. This to the end that they
may despoil and rob the people who have generously but negligently
welcomed to our hospitable shores, to become American citizens, what
has proved to be the scum of the earth; but the would-be despoilers
will fail to overthrow our Government. The Americans of today,
and all of them, will see to that. And let no one doubt it for a moment*
They have the courage, the brains, the strength, and the organiza-
tion needful to nip in the bud the criminal plans of these offscourings
of civilized peoples, and they will do it. Never fear! But while we
are making ready to attend to that job, we need to put Colonel Roose-
velt's advice into effective legislation legislation that will prevent
any more of the scum of the world from coming here and will deport
those already here.
I think I see in this wise and great movement for a Roosevelt
Memorial, worthy of him whom we would honor, an opportunity to so
focus the attention of the people of the United States upon his many
pleas and exhortations for Americanism, so as to decide them to take
the needed steps to secure for the future a citizenry worthy of our
glorious history, and at the same time the preserving of the ideals of
the past for our benefit and that of the world. If that shall happen,
and God grant that it may, who can doubt that in that spirit land to
which Colonel Roosevelt has gone, he will rejoice over his matchless
contribution to the welfare and happiness of the country and the
people he so dearly loved.
[316]
Ammran Ctgtim attb Asntriratt
BY
COLONEL HENRY D. LINDSLEY
Commander of the American Legion
WISH as head of the American Legion, to bring to
your attention what the American Legion means in
this great crisis of American history. I shall not
touch the history of the organization itself. You
know that it was born out of the thoughts of 2,000,000
men who served in France ; that it had its first meeting
in Paris, its second meeting in St. Louis ; and that next
month in Minneapolis it will have its first great annual convention;
that it has now over 1,000,000 members scattered throughout the
United States in every city, in every village, in every hamlet, and prac-
tically on every farm; that potentially it represents the nearly
5,000,000 men who served in the Army and in the Navy during the
recent war. There has never been a time, my friends of the Rocky
Mountain Club, when it was so important for the welfare of our
country as now that class distinctions should be set aside. Our
country is being threatened now by 600,000 men, who threaten
not alone the social or the economic fabric of our land, but the
very lives of our citizens. There are nearly 5,000,000 men
potentially in this organization. They know no class. They have
been drafted from the farms, they have come from the sons of the
rich man, and the poor man, of this land, and they have come from
those whose fathers go back to the days of the Revolution, and from
those whose fathers came as steerage passengers across the ocean to
our land. They have had an average of a year of discipline. They
have understood, many for the first time in their lives, a common
[317]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
language, and thank God it is the English language in which they
receive their orders. They have had no divided allegiance; they have
understood that they have but one country, and they have fought
under a single flag. There can be no greater stabilizing force in
American life than to have these 5,000,000 men, practically all under
30 years of age, to band themselves together in an organization which
understands what this country means, and who are determined above
everything else to see that this country, which has been the greatest
success as a republic in the history of the world, remains a constitu-
tional government. These men are going to look for examples. The
boys of the world look for examples. Sometimes they look to institu-
tions, and if they do, I, who am not a member of it, can say to you, Mr.
President, there is no finer example in an institution in America today
than the Rocky Mountain Club. No organization, no club, so far as
I know, has kept its touch so close on the human pulse, and has been
so ready, through its strong and influential members, in seeing that
those things are done in this country Which ought to be done.
But stronger than institutions is the force of individual example,
and to that of the one who is honored here tonight in his birthday,
Theodore Roosevelt, whether we are Democrats or Republicans,
whether we come from Texas, as I do, or from New York, as many
do, or from the West, we can look to that sterling character of Theo-
dore Roosevelt as one we can emulate. I am glad that it has been
pointed out so eloquently tonight by the eminent Secretary of State
under Mr. Roosevelt, that, with all of the things he taught, he lived
those things. And I wish to say to you, Colonel Thompson, President
of the Roosevelt Memorial Association, that the great work that you
are doing through our land would be as naught, and the monuments
that will be erected in this land to the memory of Theodore Roose-
velt of brick and stone and mortar and marble, would count for noth-
ing, magnificent as they may be, if there were not connected with them
the indomitable American everlasting spirit of Theodore Roosevelt
himself.
I want to ask you, my friends of the Rocky Mountain Club, to
bear in mind what the American Legion means, not just to these five
millions of men, but to all of the people of the United States, and to see
that you as citizens do everything you can so that these impressionable
[318]
THE AMERICAN LEGION AND AMERICAN PROBLEMS
young men, so strong to do for this country and they are ; they have
proved it again and again since the American Legion was formed,
since these days of strife came on this country in its internal affairs
-understand that they are appreciated as citizens, understand that
they have services to perform in our country, understand that there
is an interlocking between them and between those who, less fortunate
than they, in not being able to wear the uniform, nevertheless did their
full part in seeing that America measured up to its great responsibility
in the great war.
[319]
fkraotral
nf
BY
HIS EXCELLENCY, JEAN J. JUSSERAND
Ambassador from France to the United States
HAT the Toastmaster has said is quite true. Never
before in my life did I see a reception, a movement of
enthusiasm coming from the heart such as I witnessed
in New York when the winner of the Marne, Marshal
Joffre, and M. Viviani entered this noble city. If
something recalled it once in my life, it was when the
President of the United States, the victorious United
States, reached France, entered Paris, and I followed him in a carriage
where was General Pershing, both of them acclaimed by the whole
population of our city. For the second time France and the United
States had won the day together for liberty.
I have received today a telegram from the other side. The meet-
ing of the Rocky Mountain Club was known in France, and one of
our best men has sent me a telegram asking me to hand it to the Vice-
President of your Club, who has asked me to read it. It comes from
the President of the Council of France, M. Clemenceau. The tele-
gram is as follows:
" I associate cordially with the homage rendered to the great
patriot and the friend of France that President Roosevelt was. The
intrepidity of his character, and the intense activity which he dis-
played in the service of his country will perpetuate forever his mem-
ory among the men of this earth."
In the course of my long career, which has now reached its forty-
third year for I began rather young there is scarcely a thing
for which I render so great an expression of gratitude to Providence
as the fact that it was my good fortune, in the zig-zags of my diplo-
[320]
PERSONAL MEMORIES OF THEODORE ROOSEVELT
matic life, to become acquainted with Theodore Roosevelt. I met
in him a man of such extraordinary power that to find a second at
the same time on this globe would have been an impossibility; a man
whom to associate with was a liberal education, and who coyld be
in every way likened to radium, for warmth, force and light emanated
from him and no spending of it could ever diminish his store. A man
of immense interests, there was nothing in which he did not feel that
there was something worthy of study; people of today, people of
yesterday, animals, minerals, stones, stars, the past, the future -
everything was of interest for him. He studied each thing, knew
something about every subject.
There is a race in the world to which I am deeply grateful, and
that race does not know it. It is the race of the Mongols. The
Mongols are the cause of my being almost at once in terms of friend-
ship with President Roosevelt.
One day, when I had just arrived, he started to talk about
Mongols and their invasion of Europe in the thirteenth century, and
it so happened that the French Ambassador, at that time at least,
knew something about the Mongols and how they had reached the
Adriatic. This pleased President Roosevelt, and our first connecting
link was the Mongols. From my heart I thank them.
I saw in the papers that I owed the honor of being asked to this
grand gathering to the fact that I was a member of the Tennis
Cabinet. I was indeed, and very proud of it. Sport was only one of
the occupations of the Tennis Cabinet. After tennis, or after our
so-called walks, every possible question was discussed, and discussed
with the greatest sincerity and freedom; the subjects were sometimes
very confidential, and this is a compliment of which all the members
of the club can be proud ; it never occurred to President Roosevelt that
he should say to any one of us, " Mark you, this is confidential." He
knew quite well that we would understand, and for seven years not
one word that should not have been repeated was repeated. Then
we had those so-called walks, a rule of which was to ignore and scorn
as much as possible all that looked like a road or a bridge. If there
was a river, we swam it. I have swum the Potomac with him ; others
have swum rivers of floating ice. We never knew when we started
[321]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
what would be our trial, but only knew there would be one. It was
usually in winter, because in summer we played tennis, while we did
our walks in the snow, in the slush at night, when the day's work was
done, and we groped our way in the islands of the Potomac or on the
rocks along the rivers. We never knew what it was to be. Would
it be wading through the mud? Would we be climbing steep rocks?
There was between us a silent understanding never to wince at any-
thing he suggested. We said "All right," because we knew that if we
winced he would scorn us and we would have to do it all the same.
I remember an occasion in winter which took us to an island on
the Potomac. I tried some time ago to find it. I found gardens,
parks, roads, all that we used to detest. We came to the brink of
the river and found an iron tube, quite black, not very big, connecting
at some height the quay with the island, and Mr. Roosevelt, turning
to the three or four of us, said : ' Well, let's use that to get to the
island/' We never winced. The tube was not large. It looked very
slippery and the winter waters of the Potomac not at all tempting,
but we were spared. He mused a little and said : " Oh, well, we
shall nod to a boat if we see one." A boat came along and we jumped
into it, a leaky boat and our shoes became leaky from it, too. The
man in it rowed us over to the island, and President Roosevelt, put-
ting his arm around my neck and striking an attitude, said, " Wash-
ington and Rochambeau crossing the Delaware."
When we reached the island, an awkward thing occurred. We
were always asked to leave our valuables and to take our worst clothes,
to the extent that I had once to confess, " Mr. President, I have no
worst clothes left." When we reached the other side we wanted to
give something to the man who had kindly taken us over. We found
that we had nothing, but in the end, somebody, by fumbling, found a
quarter, so that our benefactor was recompensed by that quarter for
having taken over the President of the United States, the Secretary of
the Interior, the French Ambassador, and, I think, the Assistant
Secretary of the Treasury. These were happy, charming days.
Serious matters were discussed rarely while walking, but usually
when we sat, bespattered with mud, by the fireside after our " walks."
As the representative of France I was, I assure you, delighted to see
[322]
PERSONAL MEMORIES OF THEODORE ROOSEVELT
the deep understanding by Mr. Roosevelt of the genius of my country,
what her worth was and what she could do in the world.
There was at one time an issue of great importance when the
German Kaiser began to be dangerous and threatening. Mr. Roose-
velt, being as to this in complete accord with the admirable Secretary
of State of the United States and I shall not name him because he
is at this table helped us in a wonderful fashion, in the very manner
in which Americans should help the French and the French should
help the Americans. I remember one day, when the situation was
tense and we thought that perhaps the war that has been waged of
late would be waged then, Mr. Roosevelt said: " I suppose you would
be sad if a catastrophe happened to the United States; the same with
me if a catastrophe happened to France." But, owing in a large
measure to him, no catastrophe happened and the time for the war was
postponed.
Before he left for Africa he told me of his intention to go and
deliver a lecture in England. I said, " Why not in France ? " He
answered, " Well, if I deliver one in Paris, I shall have to deliver one
in Berlin." I replied, " Don't think we are such fools and so narrow-
minded we far prefer you to deliver twenty lectures in Berlin than
none in Paris." So it was decided that he would go to Paris and visit
us and deliver a lecture. He chose for his subject for the French
lecture one which I liked much, first because it was a subject of which
he was a master, and second because it was a subject which he could
not treat in Berlin, " Citizenship in a Republic." He came to France,
was received with open arms, and that extraordinary magnetism that
was his played upon my compatriots, who will ever remember him.
He had been elected a member of the Academy of Moral and Political
Sciences, and he took his seat there. It is a custom in that Academy,
even if it is the Chief of a foreign State who is elected, to receive him
without any more ceremony than the others, the President simply say-
ing, " Sir, kindly take your seat among your colleagues." That was
done for Mr. Roosevelt, the only difference being that he came in
accompanied by two Ambassadors, one of them being a foremost
member of the Tennis Cabinet, a foremost member of the real Cabinet,
and a foremost American, one whom we all mourn, as handsome in
[323]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
his mind and in his heart as he was in his physical features, one whom
I dearly loved, Robert Bacon.
A brief address was read by Boutroux, the master philosopher,
who knew America and who gave an account of his visit to this
country and of his stay in Harvard; and when he finished he said:
" Before leaving, like every good American and every good French-
man, I went to Mount Vernon, and I saw there the bedroom that was
Lafayette's when he visited Mount Vernon; and we, too," he con-
tinued, " in our Academy, had a seat that was empty, and we thought
this seat must be the seat of Mr. Roosevelt." He filled it, and the
Academy was as sad as any of us when they lost this unique member.
Mr. Roosevelt delivered his lecture on citizenship in the Sorbonne.
It had extraordinary success. While 50,000 copies were given away,
10,000 copies were sold in a week. It was a wonderful piece of work,
telling, with the knowledge of a man who knows what a man is, what
is a good citizen and what is a bad citizen.
He ended with these words, which I ask permission to repeat:
"And now, my hosts, a word of parting. You and I belong to the
only two republics among the great powers of the world. The ancient
friendship between France and the United States has been on the
whole a sincere and disinterested friendship. A calamity to you "
and he was repeating what he had told me shortly before about the
Moroccan fiasco - " a calamity to you would be a sorrow to us, but
it would be more than that. In the seething turmoil of the history of
humanity, some nations stand out as possessing a peculiar power of
charm, some special gift of power or wisdorn^or sympathy which puts
it among the immortals, which makes it rank" forever with the leaders
of mankind." He was so good as to say, " France is one of these
nations." (And I shall add, America is one of these nations.) "For
her to sink would be a loss to all the world. There are certain lessons
of brilliance and of generous gallantry that she can teach better than
any of her sister nations." And the time came for France to show
whether she was or not worthy of that compliment; whether she
deserved what Mr. Roosevelt once told me. He had said, " What
I like in your people is that with all their taste for art and for beauty
and for literature, when it is a question of fighting, they are always
[324]
PERSONAL MEMORIES OF THEODORE ROOSEVELT
ready." Well, the Germans took us by surprise, but found us not
unready. In the meantime, this great nation was preparing, listening
to the manly advice of her former leader, and the manly advice of
her present leader. The wave went on increasing and increasing until
the time when it overflowed all bounds, reached France, threw off the
Germans. You conquered in the Argonne, conquered at St. Mihiel,
and your troops won imperishable glory. The only regret of Mr.
Roosevelt was to have to stay at home. During the war I received
from him letters characteristically signed by him, not by his name but
by the words, " The Slacker malgre lui " ' The Slacker in spite of
himself." But we knew what he could do and was doing, and the
immense help that he was to the good cause.
Two tombs have been opened that contain the bodies of two
Roosevelts, one in America, the other in France. Both places of
pilgrimage, both tombs standing as one more token of the intimacy
in peace and in war, in happiness or in stress, that must survive
between our two nations for their safety and for the benefit of the
liberal world. To the great names of Americans who are admired
and loved in France, to the list that contains the names of Washing-
ton, of Franklin, of Lincoln, now has been added, forever to be loved
and admired in France just as here, the name of Theodore Roosevelt.
[325]
BY
THE HONORABLE JOB ELMER HEDGES, LL.D.
HAVE been too often at the guest table not to know
when the evening's exercises are concluded. The hour
of midnight has just passed, notwithstanding we have
turned the clock back an hour, and I know that the
evening must be over because so many are not here
who started. I am impressed with the shock it must
be, however, to those who originally came from the
Rocky Mountain district to find themselves in this sort of company and
surroundings. They certainly adapt themselves quickly to urban life
and become urban-like.
I have listened many times to the French Ambassador and never
knew until tonight how much of an Ambassador he was. It is a great
trick to walk yourself into a Presidential confidence, but I do not
think that the Ambassador walked during all the time of those walks,
not if his height indicates the length of his legs.
I think everything has been said about Roosevelt that could be
said except one or two things. It has been a great thing for the
average orator that Roosevelt has lived. He has been the cause of
more speeches which men who delivered them did not understand
than any man who ever was created. Many a man who did not have
an idea that was worth a cheer, could mention Roosevelt's name and
think he was an orator while he spoke. Roosevelt can be quoted on all
sides of most every question too. When a man wants assistance, he
quotes Roosevelt. There is one thing certain about him, that wherever
he was, there was a quorum present. He is the only man I ever knew
who could put a motion, second it and carry it without reference to
the crowd.
[326]
ROOSEVELT'S PERSONALITY AND PHILOSOPHY
It does not add to Roosevelt, in my judgment, to compare him
with Lincoln or Washington. I do not think he was like either one of
them, and I do not think that the Almighty intended that any two of
them should resemble any other one. They lived at different times
and had different problems. Washington created; Lincoln preserved;
Roosevelt vitalized. And none of them could have done what the
other did. He had a good preparation when he came here. From
the solitude of the Civil Service room in Washington, he gathered
intimates which enabled him immediately to plunge into partisan
politics through the channel of a non-partisan administration, of which
I was one. He is the only partisan I ever knew who could argue
his partisanship through a general proposition of conduct.
I do not. know of any group of people in the United States in
which he did not have an intimate. From prize-fighter to preacher
he had a real intimate friend, and there was no organization with
which he could not connect through a friend.
Roosevelt, however, despite these speeches that have been
delivered tonight and I speak with great deference in the presence
of these distinguished gentlemen, particularly the Honorable Elihu
Root, who knew him more intimately than I did - - was remarkable
on account of his normality or humanness; unfortunately I never
was intimate with him after he left the Strong Administration.
There were others who caught up with him, however.
The remarkable thing about Roosevelt's speeches, to my mind, is
that there was not a human being, young or old, rich or poor, who did
not think that Roosevelt was talking to him personally and confi-
dentially. He was one of the few men prominent in life whom you
could associate with without having to look up to uncomfortably.
When men demand a bow from other people with whom they associate,
they never get on intimate terms.
Roosevelt is the only man I ever read of who could destroy a
convention, explain the advantage of it, and go on about his business.
He was the only man whom I ever knew who could conduct a dialogue
alone, with entire acquiescence on the part of the man with whom he
was talking.
There was no specific field of mental activity in which he
[327]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
indulged, in which there was not possibly a superior authority, but he
kept them all so busy that no one had the opportunity to determine
who took precedence. He was at home in the city or the country.
He talked a language that people could understand, and that helps
some in public discourse. He had another peculiarity: you could
tell what he was thinking about by what he said, which does not always
pertain.
I know of no topic on which he did not have a pronounced opinion,
and where he had time to generate them I do not know. He was the
busiest man of whom I have ever read, and yet had time on his hands
now and then to puncture the idiosyncracies of a man whose conversa-
tion and conduct differed from his own concepts.
There was no time nor space through which he could not vault,
and he always landed. I do not know what he would have done if he
had gotten on the other side during the war ; I know they would have
known he had been there.
Whether he was schooled in the modern science lore, I do not
know, but I do know that after all the eulogies are over, and when men
have become great orators by describing Roosevelt, whom they do
not understand, and whose lesson they cannot comprehend, people will
remember Roosevelt by thinking they have been brought into per-
sonal contact with him.
The day he left Washington to return to Oyster Bay, I took
my pen in hand and wrote him a letter, which he acknowledged, and
I said this to him: that my own opinion was, that while he had had
quite a remarkable career, of all the things he had done he would be
remembered best by the philisophic historian from the fact that he
had made people think, and he could make people think even if they got
mad at him, and it didn't annoy him if they were irritated. Roose-
velt did not believe in anaemic public virtue. He did not believe a
man's past amounted to anything if it did not extend into his present.
And he did not believe that his future was a solvent hope unless his
present was concrete. He knew more about other people than they
did sometimes, and more than they wished he did. He classified
everybody. Some classes were not as large as other classes, but they
were concise and well denominated. He was unique, omnipresent,
[328]
ROOSEVELT'S PERSONALITY AND PHILOSOPHY
always vocalizing, always acting, always human, and so desperately
human that everyone thought they had an individual contact with
him. It took a great deal during the Strong administration to always
tell where he was because he did not know. He did know, however,
that the more policemen you met, the more would know you. I recall,
when a bill was passed that provided that boxing exhibitions should be
given under police protection, that he attended the first night. For
some reason or other, Dr. Parkhurst did not agree with that proposi-
tion, and he told the reporter that it was an outrageous thing; that
he did not believe he was there. The reporter asked Roosevelt if he
had been there, and he said, " I was there, and I had a good time ;
moreover, I had to go. The law said I must go." And he would have
gone anyway. Roosevelt was abnormal in his normality. He was an
average American citizen, thank God ! Ubiquitous and potential. He
was not a genius. If he had been a genius he would not have been
influential. Geniuses are made to worship, and not associate with.
He will be remembered long after people cease to read him, and
anecdotes about him will continue so long as memory reigns.
He was the only impossible, potential, practical, possible human
being I have heard of, and he enjoyed it. I have conversed with him
and enjoyed it. He has asked my opinion and told me what it was.
It didn't make any difference when you were with him whether you
agreed with him or not the result was unanimous. Disagreements
with him in conversation were explained after the other man returned
home. Many a man has gone to Washington on invitation and come
back of his own volition. I enjoyed his partianship academically.
Mr. Straus enjoyed it otherwise. But I believe in a partianship which
does not believe that faith takes the part of works. Roosevelt is the
first man for some years who has dignified the word " Politics,"
which most people don't understand. He is the man who has most
clearly demonstrated that there is no such thing as a useful inactive
citizen. The man who dare not go out nights for fear he will be
tempted cannot rescue a neighbor in distress. Roosevelt was not
afraid to expose himself. He had vision, and works. He wrote, he
spoke, he rode, he wrestled and a lot of things ; but there was no
place in his category for the parlor Bolshevist.
[329]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
Personally, if you will permit just a further word, I am not
unduly worried about these fellows who set fire to houses and try to
kill people for the purpose of demonstrating an idea that someone
else has given them. General Shanks and some others will take care
of these.
The worst thing of all is the mental indifference of the average
man of substantial affairs in life who has been lulled asleep by his
own competency and does not consider that the problems of the
republic require his participation.
To misstate a fact to the public which has little opportunity to
reason is as false a thing as it is to bear arms against the integrity
of the government. The man who will make a false statement to
gather applause to himself would touch the torch to the edifice of the
American Government. The man who considers his career settled
when he has enough to take care of himself and his progeny, most of
whom have not been brought up to work, is a man who could well be
deported, not as an alien, but as a useless citizen.
The stress is coming. I listened a few nights ago in a public
school to a lawyer, one of my own profession, advise the recall of a
judge by hanging him; and there were but four people in the room
who did not vocally assent to that proposition. And I have mentioned
that several times and never has it been received, except tonight, by
other than a smile as if the Republic could be taken for granted.
The Republic cannot be taken for granted. The propositions are very
simple.
You can divide the human race, so far as the males go, into full-
grown men and shrimps. The shrimps are largely self-perpetuating.
My own beliefs are very simple. A man is a citizen in fact or
not. If he doesn't like this place, he can leave, and if he insists on
staying, he shall live as we live, and if he will not do that, we will
deport him, and if we cannot deport him, we will put him in jail, and
if that don't suffice, we'll shoot him, because the life of the Republic
is more important than any individual life.
Nobody in this country cares how much money somebody else has ;
they are very much interested in knowing how they got it. The vulgar
display of wealth in this country has made more Socialists than all
[330]
ROOSEVELT'S PERSONALITY AND PHILOSOPHY
the Russian doctrinaires who ever got on this side of the water. The
failure of men of affairs to participate in the activities of this gov-
ernment is a bid for the incoming immigrant to do likewise; and his
next instinct is to try to destroy it, in the hope, not of building up
something else, but that in the breaking down he may be able to get
something without having the title taken away from him.
Why, in this little city of ours, this young man Trotsky, who is
running the Russian Government today unless he was captured
today preached the same doctrines in the streets of New York
before he went abroad that he is teaching and practising in Russia,
and 5,000,000 people let him do it without interfering. And I say the
City of New York, in permitting that young man to get abroad, is
indirectly responsible for the loss* of a million lives in Russia and we
cannot dodge it.
No man can be flippant on the subject of government. The
Fathers may be old-fashioned, but their doctrines are new, so far as
everyday discussion goes. They are so new that most people have not
heard of them. They are progressive rather than conservative. And
I like that word in that particular application. No man is progressive
because he says he is. The question is whether he is progressing. 1
have known men to progress so fast toward a place that they were out
of breath when they arrived and could not tell what they were looking
for. I believe in the Ten Commandments. I have respect for the Four-
teen Points. I believe in this government, and I have a right to. My
people have been in every war the country ever engaged in. They
signed the Declaration of Independence, incidentally. That makes me
an aristocrat. That makes me old-fashioned. But I cannot help
believing that the Golden Rule still prevails. I heard a gentleman, of a
faith other than my own, the other night, say that the way to Ameri-
canize these immigrants was to open our arms to them, take them to
our breast and win them by loving kindness, and I said, " Yes, but let
us search them at the same time." I would rather be able to state a
fact than to expound a theory that no one can understand. Theodore
Roosevelt was a fact. I know it. You know it. Everybody knows
it. A great, glorious, human energy of high ideals, abnormal in his
normality, on a plane that everybody could see and with whom anyone
could associate, with bitter enemies, with real friends, with an ever-
[331]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
present crowd, as people always have, of men to agree with him, of
others who differed from him, of ambassadors who walked with him,
who wore their clothes out with him. But just imagine the feeling
of the man who rowed the boat toward the crowd that could but find
a quarter among them.
Interpret that in the light of the demands of the present day when
soldiers get $1.10 a day and people who didn't go abroad get $8.10.
Just a word and then I close, because it is tomorrow. I don't
know much about doctors, I don't know much about any of these
theories that take long words to describe ; I don't know anything about
any of these things where you have to have a lot of whereases, and
use words that you have to practice on before you can pronounce them ;
I don't know anything about Internationalism, any of those things.
But I do know that the Almighty created colors in people, climates and
nations, and provided ways in which they should grow up among them-
selves ; and I know that when we come to our problem there isn't any
mind in this audience, or any mind in the U. S. cunning enough; no
device broad enough; no philosophy skilled enough in human experi-
ence, to bring any of the warring factions together until each one of
those factions admits before all the country that their first allegiance
is to the nation at large, and then they are open for discussion for
their own matters.
I know that no problem this country has ever had has ever been
settled, as a matter of logic, as a matter of reasoning, unless some-
where, somehow, somebody interjected into it a sentiment; and senti-
ment starts with the heart and not the brain, and the brain decides the
amount of service we will give to the sentiment. We argued about
this great war until we argued in a circle, and we were getting nowhere
and the war was getting everywhere. But, when the American people
trusted their emotions, then logic was satisfied, and then we went to
war. And after that, we saved the world for democracy after
that.
It is a difficult thing, when we are talking in hundreds of millions
of dollars, to have an emotion. It is difficult to have a sentiment when
you are comparing your financial qualifications with somebody else's.
It is a very difficult thing when you consider the rewards of publicity
[332]
ROOSEVELT'S PERSONALITY AND PHILOSOPHY
and the sycophants that will pursue a man in public life, to keep your
reason straight.
It is dangerous to take the republic for granted. It is very illogi-
cal to assume that a republic can continue without the individual effort
of everybody in it. The people of the United States have not learned
yet to think in terms of " we." The reason many men do not discuss
things openly is because they would be bound by their own logic.
When a man lays down a proposition for himself and does not follow
it, he is not potential with other people. There are too many people
waiting to be called who will never be chosen. We have great con-
fidence in our present and in our future, and we bet on our future
usually, but usually with ourselves, and therefore there is no loss. I
venture the proposition that the very intensity of the political
embroglios in which Theodore Roosevelt was engaged, this very
partisanship which men praised and from which they differed, the
very activities that tore this country apart in a great big tremendous
political revolution will somewhere, somehow, be quite as much of
a mental stimulus to the average man as will anything Theodore
Roosevelt said as to what a man should do as to any particular degree
of activity.
It takes a large degree of nerve and confidence, eliminating
Providence, for a. man to assert what another man must think; but
every man has a right to demand, as a matter of citizenship contract,
that every other man shall think, and having thought, that he shall act.
I am not certain, as I stand here, that Theodore Roosevelt could
be more potential today alive than he is. I am not certain but what
there comes a time when a man reaches the limit of influence from
personal activity. I am not certain but what there comes a time, how-
ever brilliant the brain, when the scene needs to change. I am not
certain, with all his potential influence, that his statements, written
as they were and spoken as they were, are not quite as influential with
the American people as a personal activity ; and I say that with great
respect ; because it is not possible for a man to veneer himself over one
hundred and ten millions of people.
Washington would have been a failure in the Civil War. Wash-
ington had a mind that had to abstract ; he was a constructor, he had
[333]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
to live away from the picture. He thought in world terms applied to
a locality. He had not the art of human association except with
intimates ; he had never been brought up to it. Lincoln could not have
created what Washington did ; Lincoln had to dream ; Lincoln had his
associates, high and low, but Lincoln had to be away from the picture.
Lincoln had to live his thoughts in an attitude of prayer. Lincoln had
to be abstract in his thinking, while he was concrete in his conduct.
And until the time of Roosevelt, there had never been a man in the
White House who had solved the art and it is an art of official
and human contact with a large number of people. Roosevelt raised
to its highest influence, the question of personal contact. Roosevelt's
speeches and his writings would have been impotent without his
virility and his frequent touch with human life.
Roosevelt could never have lived potentially and inf luentially as
A mental abstraction. Therefore, Roosevelt lived, in the providence
of the great God, at a moment when the factions, social and civil,
in the United States, required a human being who could be brought
into contact with every other human being, and demonstrate that
officialdom did not prevent human association. And that is the phi-
losophy of Theodore Roosevelt, as I understand it.
[334]
(Shtr >0Ufors anh ilj? Unrkg
ittmmtaiu (Club
BT
MAJOR-GENERAL DAVID CAREY SHANKS
Commander of the Port of Embarkation
ESTEEM it a great honor to say even a few words for
Colonel Roosevelt; a soldier himself, he was peculiarly
the friend of soldiers, and no soldier in a good cause
ever applied to him in vain. Nearly two years ago, in
the blackest and coldest of all American winters, our
great embarkation camp at Camp Merritt was filled to
overflowing with soldiers who were waiting their turn
to go abroad in active service. In order to provide for the welfare of
those soldiers, through the generosity of Mrs. Merritt and others, a
great Soldiers' Club was instituted, Merritt Hall, which has since
become the greatest club ever founded in America for our soldiers.
It was deemed that that club should be opened by some kind of formal-
ity, something to stir up the spirits of our men, for the news from
abroad was not good, and there was a general consensus of opinion
that the man to stir up the soldiers was Colonel Roosevelt.
I went to his office and asked him to go, but his Secretary
with kindness informed me that it was impossible, that the Colonel
was out with a Committee seeing that the poor children of New York
should have pure milk, that every hour of his time was taken. I left
a note saying that I would ask only one minute of his time. By phone,
I had a message to call the next day. And when I told him that our
soldiers needed somebody to stir them up, that we wanted to hand
down in that camp a proper spirit and to create the proper spirit, he
said, " I will come the first afternoon I can get off." He never hesi-
tated a minute. And when the afternoon came, it was in January, the
[335]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
roads were covered with snow and ice, one of the coldest days of the
winter. Many another man would have turned back, but the Colonel
went out, and he delivered a rousing address in Merritt Hall, which
was packed like sardines with soldiers; and at the Y. M. C. A. Building,
which would normally hold twenty-eight hundred, more than four
thousand were packed in at an overflow meeting. On every post
and every pillar and even up in the rafters there were soldiers; and
never in my life have I seen such enthusiasm. The spirit which the
Colonel aroused at that time was handed on from one organization to
another. No man can tell the good that address did.
It was on that trip, too, as I took him out, that I learned how
deep was his disappointment that he himself could have no active
participation in this war. I learned to know then how bitter was his
feeling that he was not able to be a soldier himself.
He said to me, " Here am I, a man of action, and all I can do is
only talk and write."
You have all heard what the Rocky Mountain Club has done
for the Belgian Relief, but members of that club though you are, I
doubt if many of you know what you have done for the soldiers. The
Rocky Mountain Club has been one of the great instrumentalities in
caring for our soldiers, in making a home for those who are from the
West. Through that club, more than one hundred and fifty thousand
letters and telegrams were distributed to men from the Rocky Moun-
*tain region. There was a cordial greeting there not only for the
" Boys of the West " but for every American soldier who visited
the club.
Thousands and thousands of dollars of the club's money were
spent to take care of our men. I recall a little incident last June,
when I was over in France and was waiting on the pier at Brest. I
went over on the Leviathan and as soon as we got off, they started
loading sick and wounded back on there, and I saw two soldiers, both
of them on a litter, one from Colorado and one from Wyoming. I
went up and talked to them for a moment, asked them where they
were wounded, and they said they were getting better and they hoped,
by the time they got to New York, they would be able to get around
a little bit. But they said they were far from home when they reached
New York ; and I said to them, " Oh, no, you may be far from home,
[336]
OUR SOLDIERS AND THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN CLUB
but you won't be far. from friends. There is a club in New York that
looks after men from your section." And I told them where it was,
and they said, " How will we find it? ' I said, " Go to 44th Street
near 6th Avenue, and look for that flag which you will find there,
' Welcome Home, Boys of the West.' '
Now that work which was done is little known to your members,
I imagine. I saw the benefits of it. I know your worthy president
and your vice-president and others of the club gave all the backing to
it that they could, but I feel that I ought to say that to your club
secretary, Mr. Herbert Wall, a very great part of the credit is due.
He did it in magnificent shape, and on behalf of those soldiers who
enjoyed the hospitality and the benefits of your club, I want to thank
you.
Now, I have covered the incident of going with Colonel Roose-
velt to Camp Merritt; will you pardon me, if I close by relating one
little incident which happened to me in my embarkation service a
little out of the ordinary but in a way very pleasing.
One day last January, in opening the mail, I found a letter
addressed to me by name. It was postmarked Detroit, and when I
opened the letter, the first thing that fell out of it was a large picture
cut from a newspaper. It fell on the desk and I opened it and it was a
picture of a ferryboat crowded with soldiers ; you never saw so many
soldiers on one boat in your life ; and in the foreground was one man
whose face was particularly clear, rather emaciated; it looked as if he
had been sick. And on the cap of the soldier, the writer with a pen
had made a cross-mark and down on the blouse underneath the chin
was another. I looked to see what the letter that accompanied this
picture stated, and when I looked at the letter it was in the scrawling
writing and the simple words of a school girl, and it ran something
like this. It said, " General Shanks: My mother tells me to write and
send you this picture. We think it is a picture of my brother, but the
War Department wired us that he was killed in Flanders last
October; but my mother says to tell you she knows that is her boy.
Can you help us? "
The newspaper clipping had been cut so close that the name of the
paper and its date were missing; there was nothing but the picture
itself. But fortunately the girl signed her name and I sent for our
[337]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
transportation officer, who runs all passenger lists of the great trans-
ports more than 300,000 came back in some months and I told
him to get busy and see if they could find that name.
Within four hours they came back to me with a story and a
report which was true, that the boy was in Greenhut Hospital,
wounded, and I was able to send to that mother a telegram which gave
me more pleasure than any of the thousands that were sent out bear-
ing my name, that her boy was in Greenhut Hospital, was rapidly
getting better, and would be able to go home in a few days.
[338]
far (ur Sftm* anfo All
BY
THEODORE ROOSEVELT
HE teachings of the New Testament are foreshadowed
in Micah's verse : u What more doth the Lord require
of thee than to do justice, and to love mercy, and to
walk humbly with thy God? "
Do justice; and therefore fight valiantly against
the armies of Germany and Turkey, for these nations
in this crisis stand for the reign of Moloch and
Beelzebub in this earth.
Love mercy; treat prisoners well; succor the wounded; treat
every woman as if she were your sister; care for the little children;
and be tender with the old and helpless.
Walk humbly ; you will do so if you study the life and teachings
of the Saviour.
May the God of Justice and Mercy have you in His keeping!
Message placed in all copies of the New Testament given to soldiers
during the War by the New York Bible Society.
We shall never be successful over the dangers that confront us;
we shall never achieve true greatness, nor reach the lofty ideal which
the founders and preservers of our mighty Federal Republic have set
before us, unless we are Americans in heart and soul, in spirit and
purpose, keenly alive to the responsibility implied in the very name of
American, and proud beyond measure of the glorious privilege of
bearing it. American Ideals.
We Americans are the children of the crucible. The crucible does
not do its work unless it turns out those cast into it in one national
mould; and that must be the mould established by Washington and
his fellows when they made us into a nation. We must be Americans ;
and nothing else. The Foes of Our Own Household.
[339]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
The most perfect machinery of government will not keep us as a
nation from destruction if there is not within us a soul. No abound-
ing material prosperity shall avail us if our spiritual senses atrophy.
The foes of our own household shall surely prevail against us unless
there be in our people an inner life which finds its outward expres-
sion in a morality not very widely different from that preached by the
seers and prophets of Judea when the grandeur that was Greece and
the glory that was Rome still lay in the future. The Foes of Our
Own Household.
[340]
la
Kwriwrfc by tbr Kurlui Mountain CClub at Us
iUuisrurlt Bag Btnn*r
IS MAJESTY the King, deeply appreciates the courte-
ous invitation of Rocky Mountain Club to be present
at dinner on October twenty-seventh. Unfortunately
that day the King will already have left New York.
The King knows the tremendous aid and effective
help given to suffering Belgium by the Rocky Moun-
tain Club, and wishes again to extend to members of
this splendid organization his sincerest thanks for all that they have
done for Belgium." - KING ALBERT OF BELGIUM, through His Excel-
lency, the Belgian Ambassador to the United States.
' The impress that Theodore Roosevelt's personality has made
upon the world does not need emphasis. Whatever his fame as a
statesman, it can never outrun his fame as a man. However widely
men may differ from him in matters of national policy, this thing men
in their hearts would wish, that their sons might have within them
the spirit, the will, the strength, the manliness, the Americanism of
Roosevelt. He was made of that rugged and heroic stuff with which
legend delights to play. The Idylls and Sagas and the Iliads have
been woven about men of this mold. We may surely expect to see
developed a Roosevelt legend, a body of tales that will exalt the
physical power and endurance of the man and the boldness of his
spirit, his robust capacity for blunt speech and his hearty comradship,
his live interest in all things living these will make our boys for the
long future proud that they are of his race and his country. And no
surer fame than this can come to any man to live in the hearts of the
boys of his land as one whose doings and sayings they would wish to
make their own." FRANKLIN K. LANE, Secretary of the Interior.
[341]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
' It is fortunate for the American people to have at an hour such
as this a memory like that of Theodore Roosevelt to draw upon. It
steadies us." - HENRY J. ALLEN, Governor of Kansas.
" I wish that Mr. Roosevelt's voice could now speak to America.
It cannot. But the emphasis put upon his life by such events as
your's, is the next best thing that can be done to help re-Americanize
America." JOHN H. BARTLETT, Governor of New Hampshire.
" In the uncertain and anxious days of our preparation for war
with Germany, more than any other citizen he was the tribune of the
people, and with a message of true Americanism, which rang from
Ocean to Ocean, the spirit of Americanism was renewed. That the
Americanism proclaimed by Theodore Roosevelt will be our guardian
principle now and in future years is my hope." - R. LIVINGSTON
BEECKMAN, Governor of Rhode Island.
" Our entire country owes him a debt of gratitude for his
unswerving devotion to our country and his noble example of
patriotism." - THEO. G. BILBO, Governor of Mississippi.
" Theodore Roosevelt was an outstanding typical American,
fearless in his moral courage, gifted with a versatility that few of our
public men have possessed and thoroughly understood and ably repre-
sented the new American spirit of liberty and democracy. In my
opinion ex-President Roosevelt did as much as any one leader in the
country to arouse the dormant spirit of American patriotism and to
preach the gospel of preparedness that culminated in our glorious
victories at Chateau Thierry, the Argonne Forest and the Belleau
Woods." - CHARLES H. BROUGH, Governor of Arkansas.
" Much to my regret it will be impossible for me to be present at
the Rocky Mountain Club Dinner on Theodore Roosevelt's birthday.
It is indeed fitting that such a tribute should be accorded to our late
foremost citizen, Theodore Roosevelt, whose work in behalf of this
nation still goes on although he is no longer with us in body."
THOMAS E. CAMPBELL, Governor of Arizona.
[342]
TRIBUTES TO ROOSEVELT
" What would Roosevelt do if he undertook to settle the thousand
and one strikes of the day, to cut Bolshevism out of honest labor, to
speed up production, or to keep one hundred per cent. Americanism
in our international relations? He was fearless and had but one
policy, the square deal. His diplomacy was courageous, direct, single-
purposed, just, effective, American. The career of Theodore Roose-
velt furnishes the best examples of patriotism and statesmanship to
guide American citizens in discharging their duties of the day."
PERCIVAL W. CLEMENT, Governor of Vermont.
" In his great body and sparkling mind, Theodore Roosevelt
stands with us no more. He lies as many another of the greater
works of God, a man rather to be known without the mere physical,
and we who knew him well will not reach the place where we shall not
wish he might have tarried longer. Would that we all had the ever-
lasting fearlessness of Roosevelt to find and face the truth ; to advo-
cate and fix it when and where it is. Theodore Roosevelt, though
dead, lives on and on and on. All his life had been a struggle until
the last. Then he went to sleep and there was no battle. God was
with him." - W. L. HARDING, Governor of Iowa.
" Theodore Roosevelt was a dominant factor in American public
life for thirty years. During all that time he thought and strove for
a better, juster society. Men differed with him as to the route, but
not as to the goal humanity should strive to attain. His robust and
fearless Americanism was like a bugle-call to his countrymen when-
ever danger threatened, from within or without. Whether in office
or in private life, he was a leader of thought and an inspirer of action.
And now with the new problems which the end of the war has
brought, his voice will be sorely missed. It is fortunate indeed for
the coming years that he lived long enough to give utterance upon
many of the important questions which confront us. Whenever
despotism, whether the despotism of some future Hohenzollern or a
Bolshevist, shall threaten, Theodore Roosevelt, though in his grave,
will speak to the American people with a compelling voice. He is still
the valiant foe of greed, oppression and injustice. He will live for-
ever in the hearts of the American people." FRANK O. LOWDEN,
Governor of Illinois.
[343]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
' The words and deeds of Theodore Roosevelt express the ideals
of America. He represented in thought and lived in action all that
is best in our institutions. To keep sacred his memory in the way he
would most desire would be to live in community, State and nation as
an American, as he lived and spoke and worked." - JOHN G. TOWN-
SEND, JR., Governor of Delaware.
" He was found faithful over a few things and he was made
ruler over many ; he cut his own trail clean and straight and millions
followed him toward the light. He was frail; he made himself a
tower of strength. He was timid; he made himself a lion of courage.
He was a dreamer; he became one of the great doers of all time.
Men put their trust in him; women found a champion in him; kings
stood in awe of him, but children made him their playmate. He
broke a nation's slumber with his cry, and it rose up. He touched the
eyes of blind men with a flame that gave them vision. Souls became
swords through him ; swords became servants of God. He was loyal
to his country and he exacted loyalty; he loved many lands, but he
loved his own land best. He was terrible in battle, but tender to the
weak; joyous and tireless, being free from self-pity; clean with a
cleanness that cleansed the air like a gale. His courtesy knew no
wealth, no class; his friendship, no creed or color or race. His
courage withstood every onslaught of savage beast and ruthless man,
of loneliness, of victory, of defeat. His mind was eager, his heart
was true, his body and spirit, defiant of obstacles, ready to meet
what might come. He fought injustice and tyranny; bore sorrow
gallantly; loved all nature, bleak spaces and hardy companions,
hazardous adventure and the zest of battle. Wherever he went he
carried his own pack ; and in the uttermost parts of the earth he kept
his conscience for his guide." O. H. SHOUP, Governor of Colorado.
' Theodore Roosevelt, thorough American, striving always for
the good of America." WILLIAM D. STEPHENS, Governor of Cali-
fornia.
"As a citizen, Theodore Roosevelt approached the ideal. His
occupation was America ; his relaxation was study. His pleasure was
[344]
TRIBUTES TO ROOSEVELT
friendship. His family relations, too sacred to be lightly intruded
upon, were those to which good men everywhere aspire and good
women best understand and appreciate. While he lived, millions fol-
lowed him because they believed in him as a force for righteousness,
justice, peace and progress; and a whole people mourns his loss."
WILLIAM M. CALDER, United States Senator, New York.
" Such men are greatly needed in these trying times. Among
the great world characters, Theodore Roosevelt stands among the
foremost and history will record him as one of the great leaders of
the world. Theodore Roosevelt was truly a wonderful man, always
a true American and always for fair play to his fellow man."
CHARLES CURTIS, United States Senator, Kansas.
" I want to assure you that nothing could give me greater
pleasure, if it were possible to do so, than to be present on this occasion
and thus testify to my admiration for the man and for that pro-
nounced Americanism for which he stood." - WILLIAM P. DILLING-
HAM, United States Senator, Vermont.
" He not only was the man of his age, but, through his influence
for good, will remain the man of generations yet to come." WALTER
E. EDGE, United States Senator, New Jersey.
" I very greatly wish that I might be with you tonight and join
in the tributes which will be paid to one of the foremost men America
has ever produced. Theodore Roosevelt stood for America first, last
and all the time. A wise statesman, a profound scholar, a fearless
soldier, and an uncompromising friend of the whole people. He left
a name that will go down in the history of the United States, and be
linked in ages to come with the names of the world's greatest men.
The very fact that all over this land his memory is being revered
tonight by multitudes of Americans, who loved, honored and
respected him, is the highest tribute that could be paid him."
DAVIS ELKINS, United States Senator, West Virginia.
" Not only was he one of the foremost statesmen of his day, but
his private life, his love for home and family, is an inspiration and
[345]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
example not alone to his contemporaries, but to all those who shall
follow him." - BERT M. FERNALD, United States Senator, Maine.
" Deeply regret that pending legislation in the Senate prevents
my being present at the Roosevelt Birthday Dinner at the Waldorf-
Astoria. The life of Theodore Roosevelt has been an inspiration to
every red-blooded American. He was the most versatile genius of
modern history, holding high place. As a Louisianian, I can never
forget how he established confidence and dispelled existing fear at a
time when the south land was threatened by an epidemic of yellow
fever, in nineteen hundred and five, the last visitation of that dread
disease to our country. I join with you in all honor to the great
American." EDWARD J. GAY, United States Senator, Louisiana.
" Theodore Roosevelt stood for America first, not upon occa-
sion, but upon three hundred and sixty-five and a fourth days in the
year. His Americanism was twenty karats fine mine run. He
accepted and obeyed the first commandment of patriotism, ' Thou
shalt have no other country before me.' To attempt to add to this at
the present juncture would be vain repetition." THOMAS P. GORE,
United States Senator, Oklahoma.
" I sincerely regret that it is impossible for me to leave Wash-
ington to attend the Roosevelt Memorial Banquet of the Rocky
Mountain Club. It would have been a real pleasure to pay my per-
sonal tribute to the memory of the greatest American it has been my
privilege to know." -FREDERICK HALE, United States Senator.
Maine.
" We are only now coming to understand his lofty stature as an
outstanding and courageous American. It is good to believe that
every meeting in his memory and every grateful mention of his
name will contribute to the American spirit which he himself would
have promoted, and which is so necessary for the great American
fulfillment." WARREN G. HARDING, United States Senator, Ohio.
[346]
TRIBUTES TO ROOSEVELT
" Theodore Roosevelt was a great American, and I am glad to
join the efforts of the prominent citizens in Georgia in a memorial
to his memory." WILLIAM J. HARRIS, United States Senator,
Georgia.
" Unexpected developments brought a vote in Senate today on
Johnson amendment which prevented my attending dinner. I wish
to add my word of admiration for the late Theodore Roosevelt and his
Americanism. His many accomplishments place him among the
greatest men of our country. His devotion to country is an inspira-
tion to those of us who are permitted to carry on." - C. B. HENDER-
SON, United States Senator, Nevada.
" It would have been an honor and pleasure to meet his fellow-
citizens of New York City on this occasion, thereby expressing my
profound respect and affection for the great American whose mem-
ory you will honor and whose virtues, wisdom and patriotism become
more striking and admirable with the passing of time." - P. C. KNOX,
United States Senator, Pennsylvania.
" Permit me to add that one of the truly great men produced by
America was Theodore Roosevelt. Of course, I differed with him in
politics, but I always admired his strength of character, his firmness
of purpose, his sterling patriotism, his willingness to fight for his
country and his power and aptitude for doing great things." - KEN-
NETH MCKELLAR, United States Senator, Tennessee.
" No gathering which contemplates the life of that great Ameri-
can patriot could fail of inspiration to all those who love their country
and their fellowmen in practical sincerity; and in the days since his
passing away, whenever I have had occasion to think of him, the words
of Froude upon hearing of the death of Carlyle have instinctively
sprung to my mind : 'A man is dead ! ' - GEORGE H. MOSES, United
States Senator, New Hampshire.
" On account of the consideration of the Peace Treaty in the
Senate it is out of the question for me to leave Washington at this
[347]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
time. Were the situation different, I assure you I should most cer-
tainly attend the banquet and take occasion to pay my tribute of regard
and respect for the high character, splendid attainments and patriotic
services of the distinguished statesman whose anniversary you cele-
brate." BOISE PENROSE, United States Senator, Pennsylvania.
" Roosevelt's best and freest life was spent in the west, where he
broadened his ideas and laid up a fund of health which carried him
through his unparalleled career. I join with you in honoring his
memory." - JAMES D. PHELAN, United States Senator, California.
" In many things I differed radically with Theodore Roosevelt,
but I admired him for the intensity of his Americanism ; and in times
like these his is a name to conjure with. I wish the memorial move-
ment every success." ATLEE POMERENE, United States Senator,
Ohio.
'* I know the Nation which reveres his memory will be with you
spiritually in your commemoration exercises. Theodore Roosevelt
was truly a great American, and while many differed with him on
important national questions his opponents join almost unanimously
with his friends and admirers in testifying to the devoted, conscien-
tious and tireless public service he dedicated to America, and her tradi-
tions." JOSEPH E. RANSDELL, Uniled States Senator, Louisiana.
" While I differed radically upon matters of party politics with
Mr. Roosevelt, there was no divergence of our views on all those
great questions which involved the honor and independence of the
United States.
" Theodore Roosevelt was a great American who believed in a
great America." -JAMES A. REED, United States Senator, Missouri.
" Few men in our nation's history have so powerfully influenced
the American people. The observance of the anniversary of his birth-
day will give emphasis to the spirit of loyalty to the institutions which
distinctly characterize our republic, the spirit of intense and never-
failing Americanism." J. T. ROBINSON, United States Senator,
Arkansas.
[348]
TRIBUTES TO ROOSEVELT
" I regret exceedingly that the situation in the Senate prevents
my being present at the dinner tonight in commemoration of the
birthday of Theodore Roosevelt. Our country is now and always will
be safer and stronger in patriotism and conduct because of his thrill-
ing words and his great example. He, being dead, yet speaketh."
SELDON P. SPENCER, United States Senator, Missouri.
11 In times like these, every good American citizen will appreciate
the masterful qualities of Theodore Roosevelt. He was not a mere
dreamer nor, as his biographer expressed it, a man whose conception
of duty consisted in ' magnificent ideals at long range,' but one who
saw and performed the immediate task of the hour. As I have had
occasion to say, he was at the time of his death our greatest Ameri-
can. Whence conies such another?" - THOMAS STERLING, United
States Senator, South Dakota.
" Theodore Roosevelt was one of the most intensely American
and intensely human individuals whom we have ever known. We
lost a true patriot when he passed away; and now in these troublous
times, we hear on all sides expressions of heartfelt regret that he is
not here to help us in guiding the destinies of our country whose
people loved and trusted him, and looked up to his masterly qualities
of mind with a confidence that is not often given so generally to men
in public pursuits. The record of his life and works will go down in
history as an example that American manhood may well emulate."
FRANCIS E. WARREN, United States Senator, Wyoming.
" I earnestly trust that the occasion will be worthy of the great
man in whose honor it is held." - JAMES E. WATSON, United States
Senator, Indiana.
" I would like to do honor by my presence, or rather have honor
done to my presence by being with you on Theodore Roosevelt's birth-
day. However much we may have differed in our time about partisan
political matters, we never differed at all in a strenuous and pro-
nounced Americanism; a determination that aliens and hyphenates
should not control this country ; and in devotion to the progress of the
[349]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
human race in liberty, and democracy and fraternity. It is a source
of consolation to me to remember that we were personally always
good friends, although he was supreme and I a modest participant in
the councils of opposing parties. It is my opinion that he was superla-
tively possessed of the three cardinal virtues: honesty, courage and
truthfulness." -JOHN SHARP WILLIAMS, United States Senator,
Mississippi,
[350]
JJH tfyp N?ui fG?ao,tt? of Natiotta An
SttHtrumntt of (Fgratmg for
f lawman ICibFrty
BY
FRANK ALLABEN
President of The National Historical Society
| HE question put at the head of this article may seem
surprising from one who has so many times and so
emphatically urged in these pages the formation of a
League of Nations to enforce international righteous-
ness and to outlaw duelling wars. Yet at Paris the
dictators of the proposed world peace, President
Wilson, Mr. Lloyd George, and Mr. Clemenceau,
made three grave mistakes which bring a great moral issue before the
conscience of the world. The three errors form a sequence, closely
related, showing how one moral failure leads directly to a second, and
this to a third, while the three wrongs together produce a new situa-
tion, causing widespread apprehension concerning the practicability
of the proposed League of Nations.
The three blunders are :
1. Refusal of Japan's just request for a declaration of the essen-
tial politisal equality of the white and yellow races.
2. The proposal to dispose of the City of Fiume in violation
of the will of its inhabitants and thus contrary to the principle that
" governments derive their just powers from the consent of the gov-
erned."
3. Usurpation by three men of a pretended right to transfer
goods and privileges in Shantung, which had been seized by a robber
(Germany), to another robber (Japan), instead of restoring them
to their lawful owners, the Chinese of Shantung.
[3511
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
These errors, which followed one another in the order in which
we mention them, plainly show a descending progression into increas-
ingly serious iniquities.
In the first place, it would have been very simple to have pro-
claimed the general principle of race equality, while safeguarding
the right of each nation to regulate its own immigration problems
on economic grounds. President Wilson and Mr. Lloyd George are
commonly reported to have been responsible for the refusal of Japan's
just demand for a declaration of race equality, which Premiers
Clemenceau and Orlando were willing to concede. The effect of the
error was soon manifest: those who refused this just claim of Japan
lost the moral power to refuse the unjust claim which she subse-
quently advanced against the rights of China.
Again, having partially alienated the Japanese Peace Delegation
by refusing their righteous claim to a recognition of the equality of
races, the Italian Delegation and all Italy were completely alienated
by an unrighteous denial to the City of Fiume of the right to decide
her own destiny. The consequent withdrawal of the Italian Delega-
tion from the Peace Conference made it appear that Italy might be
forced out of the proposed League of Nations and compelled to make
a separate peace with Germany and Austria.
At this juncture, with the five principal peace delegations at
Paris reduced to only four, and with the project of a League of
Nations thus placed in jeopardy, the Japanese Delegates saw their
opportunity and pressed, against the rights of China, their grossly
unrighteous claim to seize for themselves the advantages in Shantung
which Germany had burglarized from the Chinese. Fearing that the
Japanese Delegation might withdraw, as the Italian Delegation had
done, President Wilson, Mr. Lloyd George, and Mr. Clemenceau
betrayed the world in a cowardly and iniquitious surrender to Japan.
Having forfeited the support of Italy by wronging her and
Fiume, these gentlemen had lost the stamina to resist the robber-
claims of Japan. Having refused Japan where she was right, they
balanced the scale by sanctioning her violence in a criminal act,
weighing one wrong against another, and violating every pledge they
had given their peoples to make a righteous peace.
[352]
IS THE LEAGUE AN INSTRUMENT OF TYRANNY?
At Fiume and Shantung alike we see the grossest violation of
the great American principle that human government derives its just
powers from the consent of the governed. In the case of Fiume
President Wilson played the leading part. In the case of Shantung
he is thought to have acquiesced reluctantly having fallen into
the trap set by his previous betrayal of his principles. In both cases
there is reason to believe that Mr. Lloyd George is behind these
errors; and, if so, he may find that he has hopelessly confirmed the
American people in their deep-seated conviction that British politi-
cians can never be trusted in a stand for righteousness against British
cupidity.
Fiume is a city of which Americans know little. But the wrongs
which republican China has suffered at the hands of autocratic
Japan are well known in this country, which feels a deep interest in
the welfare of its friend and imitators, the Chinese. Even should we
close our eyes to a trampling upon the rights of 50,000 people in
Fiume, we are not likely to remain indifferent when the same issue
is raised on a far greater scale by the ceding of the rights of the
30,000,000 or 40,000,000 Chinese of the Shantung Peninsula to Japan
without regard to the consent of this enormous population.
No possible argument of expediency can justify such wrongs.
No such acts can be expedient, while men have consciences to be
outraged, and the Throne of Divine Providence refuses to let such
abominations go unpunished. We fear the consequences, immediate
and future, not as enemies to the idea of a League of Nations, but
as those who have been its most devoted friends.
It should cause no surprise to thoughtful men that such mis-
takes raise great moral issues, where the complex decisions necessary
in making peace with Germany and Austria raise none.
The very different principles involved in the two kinds of cases
seem to us quite simple, and this difference is felt by man's conscience
even though he may not analyze the reason. All law, divine and
human, demands restitution from criminals and their punishment and
loss of liberty as a safeguard to society. Wherefore the world's
conscience readily acceps the Paris solutions of the difficult problems
of exacting restitution and security from the criminal nations, Ger-
many, Austria, Hungary, Turkey, and Bulgaria. Sympathy for these
[353]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
evil-doers can be gained only by convincing our consciences that we
are wrong in thinking them responsible for the great war and for the
abominations they practiced in carrying it on.
But any unrighteousness sanctioned in handing over the liber-
ties or property of friendly, allied or neutral peoples to governments
they reject must arouse our instant anger. Is not this the very thing
we fought Germany to prevent and rectify? We cannot get away
from this. We all know that to use the new-born League of Nations
to sanction such wrongs, contemplated in the cases of Fiume and
Kiao-Chau, is to make the League of Nations an instrument of
unrighteousness at the very start.
Moreover, we cannot forgive President Wilson and Premiers
Lloyd George and Clemenceau for mistakes of this kind. For they
outrage us by putting a great temptation before us. If the peace of
Versailles and the League of Nations come to us with the handicap
of such terms it means that the consciences of all the allied nations
are terribly tempted to sanction these great injustices under the
penalty of forfeiting the offered Peace and League by rejecting the
conditions proposed, or delaying and jeopardizing them by attempts
at amendments to remove these wrongs.
Yet since the Peace and League come to the American people for
ratification of such unrighteousness, our people have no option, if
they wish to avoid the stain upon our national conscience and honor
involved in the sanction of such wrongs. And just here one of our
institutions and one of the provisions of our Constitution meet a
great test. We refer to the United States Senate, and to the Con-
stitutional limitation of the treaty-making powers of our presidents
in conditioning the acceptance of treaties by requiring their sanction
by a two-thirds vote of the Senate.
As the Peace Treaty and the Peace League come to us dishonored
by such oppressions of peoples as are contemplated in the .cases of
Fiume and Shantung, we sincerely hope that the American people,
through their Senate, will refuse to accept the Peace and the League
until the proposed wrongs are done away with.
This is a great test of our democracy. It is perfectly clear to
the whole world that the Peace terms and the League decisions, in the
final analysis, that is, in all disputed points, are the terms and deci-
[354]
IS THE LEAGUE AN INSTRUMENT OF TYRANNY?
sions dictated by three men, Wilson, Lloyd George, and Clemenceau.
They are acting as the representatives of great democracies, but
where these representatives fail, as they have done in the serious
matters here discussed, their work must be repudiated by the democ-
racies behind them, or democratic government will have failed in its
greatest crisis in human history.
We candidly expressed our total lack of hope of finding in the
British Parliament or the Assembly of France sufficient stamina to
rebuke Mr. Lloyd George and Mr. Clemenceau by rejecting their
grave errors. The world's hope here lies in the United States Senate
and in the American people behind their Senate.
In the American Senate, too, the whole issue is imperiled by
bitter partisan blindness. We have been constantly reminded of
Washington's warning against " entangling alliances." But who has
reminded us of Washington's warning which does apply his warn-
ing of the peril to America from extreme partisanship in our National
Councils?
The partisan blindness of some of our Senators seems to lead
them to wish to betray the American people and the whole world by
opposing and rejecting the entire attempt to deal with international
criminality by means of a League of Nations. One terrible conse-
quence of Wilson's surrender to unrighteousness is the fact that he
thus has given these Senatorial wreckers a powerful argument against
any League of Nations.
By his grave blunders President Wilson has shown the whole
world how easily the League of Nations can be made an instrument of
iniquity. With his fellow-leaders he has demonstrated that the policy
of the League can be and hereafter also probably will be directed
by three men, the representatives of three powers, Great Britain, the
United States, and France. He has furthermore shown that, even
were the United States always represented by as great a moral force
as President Wilson himself, Great Britain and France can secure
their ends in sanctioning iniquities by uniting their influences.
Will it be said that unanimity is required, and that the repre-
sentative of the United States may always withhold acquiescence?
But if at the outset so strong a man as Mr. Wilson surrenders to such
[355]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
a crime as Japan meditates against China, what shall we expect from
weaker representatives of the United States in the Council of the
League ?
Thus the three greatest leaders of the world by their gross
blunders have already proven that the League is not safe, as an
instrument for righteousness, unless some veto check is devised
some form of referendum by means of which every serious decision
of the League Council may be referred for ratification to the peoples
of the nations represented. If already, through our Senate, we as a
conscientious people are morally bound to wage a fight for the
liberties of Fiume and Shantung against the three great leaders at
Paris, are we willing to accept a League which does not equip us to
wage such a legal fight against wrong whenever the occasion may
occur ?
Without such a check the charge is justified that the League can
readily be made by a few politicians the greatest instrument against
right and human liberty which the world has ever seen.
England and France have in the past offended against China
much as Germany did at Shantung. Is that why they are willing to help
Japan to offend? Alsace-Lorraine was for centuries under German
rule, and in 1871 Germany secured it again by enforced treaty.
Shantung was never under German rule, and Germany forced it from
China as late as 1898. Thus Germany's title to Alsace-Lorraine was
far better than her title to Shantung. Why did not the leaders at
Paris go through the farce of pretending that Germany had a title to
Alsace-Lorraine, and then ask her to transfer this title to England,
as they pretended that Germany had a title to Shantung, and then
asked her to transfer it to Japan?
Germany had the same right to Belgium that she had to Shan-
tung, and President Wilson and Mr. Lloyd George have the same
right to ask Germany to turn Belgium over to France that they, with
Mr. Clemenceau, have to ask her to turn China's Shantung, or some
of its rights, over to autocratic and oppressive Japan, the Germany
of the Far East.
President Wilson did not like this disposal of Shantung. But
Great Britain is the secret ally of Japan, had made with her an
IS THE LEAGUE AN INSTRUMENT OF TYRANNY?
iniquitous bargain to give her some of China's property, insisted upon
doing so, and the President of the United States insulted his people
by consenting to this highway robbery in their name.
This shows the perils of the League, unless the politicians who
are to manage it can be subjected, in all their policies, to the speedy
and effective vetoes of the popular conscience of the nations they
represent. Do the League proposals provide such a veto system ?
Yet while the League thus presents a practical problem to be
solved, this peril and difficulty do not afford a valid argument against
a League with proper veto provisions. On the contrary, the virtue of
a League of Nations is disclosed in the very fact that its defects have
thus become at once so apparent to the whole world. The world has
waited for just what we see at Paris a method of dealing with
world problems in the presence of the whole world, so that any grave
mistakes of the leaders are at once apparent to the conscience of all
mankind, are subject to world-discussion, and amenable to amendment.
No fallacy, no amount of dust-throwing, can hide this great
gain. However few the nation's representatives may be in the League
Council, their adjustment of world difficulties cannot be hid in a
bushel. The eyes of the whole world will always rest on all their acts.
As we have lately seen, any attempt at secret proceedings will cause
universal scandal. Every act, every decision, will be discussed and
weighed by mankind. Such a League will be a great transparency,
through which that which concerns the world will pass clearly.
All that is needed, then, will be a carefully worked-out system
by means of which the will of the conscience of the world can register
itself and lawfully prevail over any leadership or combination of
leadership which goes astray.
Thus the greatest opportunity in the world's history is open to
the American Senate if its members can purge themselves of partisan-
ship and rise for once to the emergency of the nations. Let them give
us Peace and a League, but one redeemed from the contemplated
wrongs against Fiume and Shantung, and provided with adequate
veto checks or provision for referendum to the conscience of the
peoples of the earth.
[357]
Aftriaitr
BY
AMY A. BERNARDY
Litt. D., Universities of Rome and Florence; Writer and
Lecturer on Italian Historical and Sociological Subjects;
War-Time Volunteer Worker in America under
the Royal Italian Embassy
[HERE lies to the east of the Venetian plain a region
which since Roman times was considered the tenth
region or district of Italy proper, and as such known
by the name of Venetia Julia. It is nothing but an
actual and organic part of the former Italian border-
land of Friuli, and how in mischief anybody but an
Austro-German coalition could draw a line through
that region (and call it a boundary and the western part of it Italy and
the eastern part of it Austria) beats the unfairness of the Alsatian
boundary by the mile. To meet anything like a natural boundary line
you must travel eastward, cross the Isonzo and, coming down from
Tarvis, follow the watershed of the Julian Alps and reach the Monte
Albio or Nevoso, known in German as Schneeberg, and considered
from time immemorial as a basic point in the determination of the
Italian boundary. Thence a fairly straight and clear line does bring
you down to the sea and the city of Fiume, a junction point between the
province of Istria, a peninsular appendage of the Italian mainland on
the west, and the mainland of Croatia on the east. It will be noted
that the line thus formed, and clearly indicated by all geologic tests and
by the geographic structure of the land, is practically the same that was
set for immediate Austrian evacuation by the terms of the armistice
of November last. Coming down the Adriatic coast, the coastline very
clearly splits itself in two, the Croatian mainland, and the ridge of
islands which curve outward along the Morlacca channel and are gen-
erally known in bulk as the islands of the Quarnero.
Then comes the actual Dalmatian region, which by a common
misapprehension is sometimes taken to embrace the whole of the east-
ern Adriatic coast. Let it be very clearly understood, therefore, that
[358]
THE ADRIATIC IRREDENTA
Dalmatia proper extends from north of Zara to the Bay of Cattaro,
but the typically and fundamentally Italian Dalmatia reaches from
north of Zara to south of Spalato. After this, the coast up to Ragusa,
though teeming with Italian memories and showing Italian influence,
loses some of what can be called the intensity of the Italian spirit;
Ragusa on the other hand shows much of it, but Ragusa has always
been a rather curious autonomous entity, and was an independent
republic while Dalmatia was a Venetian province. We may add, that
all geographic and geologic tests from the structure of the subsoil to
the flora and fauna of the surface, show the close connection of the
Dalmatian borderland with the Italian coast, while its stony differen-
tiation from the mainland behind it is proved by the fact that the
Adriatic watershed is as abrupt and precipitous as a mountain lake
watershed, whereas the other side of the thick mountain chain offers a
broad and easy declivity toward a depression that finally leads to the
So much for geography. History in the Adriatic is written all over
the sea and the land, the city and the village, the church and the tower.
And it is written in Italian. Whoever has traveled from Trieste to
Ragusa can remember the lettering, in marble, in bronze, in stone; I
am not speaking of Roman history. And though the arena of Pola and
the palace of Diocletian at Spalato and the ruins of Salona and the
aqueduct of Fiume. and the Lapidarium of Trieste and the museum
of Aquileia present to the archaeologist and the aesthete, in a shorter
space of land, a nobler array of Roman glory than is to be seen any-
where in Italy with the exception of Rome ; and though they concen-
trate within those few miles, one may say, beauty and majesty enough
to outrival the Roman theatres of Orange or Seville, the arches
of Rimini, Ancona and Salonika, and a few of the Roman traces in
Asia Minor, Germany and Great Britain besides yet the glory and
the antiquity being remote it may be held none too significant. But the
point is this, that whereas in other countries the native element came
up and began building things and history of its own, in Istria and Dal-
matia the same Latin element kept on, and the following monuments
are Italian, Italian and Venetian they remain throughout the Renais-
sance, that gives some of its best artists' efforts to the cathedrals, the
"logge," the "municipii" of the coast. Giorgio Orsini, the architect of
Sebenico and Luciano Laurana, the architect of the ducal palace of
Urbino in Italy, were natives of this coast. Humanists as Fortunio
[359]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
da Sebenico, historians as Giovani Lucio, scientists as Marcantonio de
Dominis, admirals as Coriolano Cippico, were given to Venice and to
Europe by these coasts. Once the Venetian Senate was called upon
to decide whether it wouldn't be expedient to set the capital of the
Venetian republic in Zara, and as late as 1797, when a Venetian patriot
deplored the slackening of the old spirit in Venice, he was advised
thus: "Tole su ei corno e ande a Zara" [take up the ducal cap and go
to Zara], where the old spirit remained. And that it was there all
right Zara proved by burying under the altar of her cathedral the
banners of St. Mark, to await there the day of redemption, after the
fall of the Republic of Venice was announced. At the same time the
citizens of a small Istrian town, Isola, killed their "podesta," believing
him to be a traitor when he announced their coming subjection to
Austria. If you happen to be in any of the small cities of Istria you
will see an Italian church and an Italian campanile; Zara has such
good examples of Romanic architecture that Pisa, Lucca and Pistoia
can hardly compete with her ; the steeples of the cathedrals of Arbe,
Spalato and Trat are purest Italian style. The city halls of Capo,
Distria, Curzola, Pola (you see I am quoting at random) could grace
any Italian city. Trieste, although so largely modern and commercial,
is unmistakably Italian in her modernity: Milan is her prototype, and
there is no admixture of Austrian or German to her stately rows of
green-blinded, square-lined, square-built Italian houses.
When Napoleon in 1797 traded off to Austria the Venetian
republic, the Adriatic coastland followed her fate and passed into
Austrian subjection. It was somehow tacitly understood, as it was
historically logical, that if a rearrangement of the map ever happened
the fate of those lands would be determined again by the fate of Venice.
Instead, when in 1866 Austria was forced to return Venice to Italy,
she retained the Adriatic provinces for herself, which Italy was not in
a position to reclaim at the time, but which considered themselves
Venetian and Italian throughout.
Where, then, did the Jugo-Slavs come in? They came in in the
course of centuries, peeping over that very tall ridge of mountains that
divides Dalmatia from the Balkanic world, quite close to the coast,
much as the enclosing hills come steeply down to the shore of a moun-
tain lake. They came quite early in history, in more or less larc:e
groups, sometimes pushed by natural expansion, sometimes prodded
by Turkish pressure on the rear. Venice made them welcome as immi-
grants, and it is recorded that most of them were as loyal to Venice
[360]
II
II
TOLA, IN ISTUIA
1. Ai. h built li\ tin- Koinans
:_'. T-ni|ili> f AiiKHMtus
3. Tho nnrlcnt Kiin:iii Aiii|i|iltlu>atro
Italy's pastern frontier lias IH-CII ilrnun ,-\i-r siin-c l>;mti- \\ rt.',
'At Pola, near tin- Qua mam,
Which encloses Italy and lavea her IxmiKlarifs.' i.'
I
I I
SCENES AT THE ITALIAN FRONT
SCKNKS IN TKKNTO AND TKIKSTi:
1. The Castle of Huon Conslglio
.' The Cathedral
3. The Dante Monument
4. View from tin- (irnml Canul,
.".. I'anorama of Trento
Si'UUCTUiiKS IN DALMAT1A
Courtyard of the Government Palnco :it i:a>rus:i
The Golden Gate, Spalato
The Cathedral pulpit, Spalats
The Cathedral at Cattara
[368]
THE ADRIATIC " IRREDENTA
as the best Americanized immigrant or American of foreign descent
can be to America. They had no special monuments or civilization of
their own, but rather absorbed that of Venice and often settled down
as Venetians. Toward the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries they
showed some literary ambition, and there was some interchange of
literary courtesy between Italians who composed Slavic verse and
Slavs who attempted Italian strains. When Venice fell, they became
with the Italians fellow-subjects of Austria. Italy as a national
entity was not yet, and it was only toward the second half of the nine-
teenth century that Austria became keenly alive to the things that
began happening in her Italian possessions. Up to that time, Austria
had been rather exploiting than oppressing her Adriatic subjects, and
rather favored than otherwise the traditions of the Italian civilization
and the use of the Italian language along the Adriatic, because she
realized how great the influence of Venice had been all over it and
way out into the east, and she hoped to reap for her benefit all the
advantages that could be reaped from the substitution of the twin-
headed eagle for the lion of St. Mark as its rightful heir all along the
millennial trade-routes from Venice to the ^gean Sea and thence to
Constantinople. It was the "drang nach osten" in its pre-natal stage.
But when in 1866 Austria lost Venice to Italy she became keenly
aware of the fact that the severance of Venice from the Adriatic
provinces would naturally leave in the heart of these provinces a desire
for reunion with Venice and consequently union with Italy, which as
a body politic was daily achieving completion of its unity and propor-
tionately growing as a menace to Austria.
Now, Austria always was noted in history for having the logic of
the devil. She instantly knew what to do : destroy Italian nationality
in her Adriatic dominions so that all desires of the said nationality
should incidentally, along with the nationality, disappear from the
world. To do this, she needed a tool ; the Slavs were there. By the
way, in using the Slavs she achieved another rood turn for herself;
she gave them something to do and trusted that their natural gratitude
toward one who gave them of the fill of Italian land and flattered
their demographic powers of expansion would keep them from eventu-
ally turning to thoughts of liberty for themselves. She guessed right.
The denationalization of the Italian Adriatic 'was as good as achieved.
It would be hard to even attempt a review of the means, systems
and procedure with which the Italian denationalization and the dehis-
toriation of the Italian-Adriatic provinces was planned and ultimately
[369]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
all but achieved. Wholesale importation and deportation of human
beings, dumping of literally hundreds of inland alien families, with
their thousands of children, to transform the character of some typi-
cally Italian district and show up both in the election and in the school
returns; a policy of boycott and resistance, of obstructionism and
partiality ; a constant vexation of all that was Italian and encourage-
ment of all that was alien ; municipal and electoral corruption erected
to a standard of government; internal espionage ennobled to the
standing of government service; the hounding and the crushing not
only of words but of feelings ; wholesale persecution, beginning with
fines and ending with gaol and death ; every means that can be imag-
ined, and some of them too brutal for words, were in order against
the Italians of Dalmatia. Government agitators actually mingled
among the Slavic peasantry, encouraging them to cut down or burn
the vines and the crops of their Italian employers.
Many Italians, weary of the long struggle, left their ancestral
homes and went to earn a modest living in Italy, thus falling in by
necessity with Austria's desire for their absence. Many of them
served and died for Italy in this war.
In this way, while on one hand the depletion of the Italian element
was being secured, on the other the land was being rapidly filled with
alien element. Some of it was there, as I said, as an immigration
element in the course of history. Some was dumped, and a large
part of it was attracted by the extra favorable conditions made to Slavs
by Austria in the Italian provinces, so that it is no wonder that they
soon became a numerical majority in a number of districts.
That is largely how and why Italy is confronted to-day by the
fact, chiefly "made in Austria," that the Jugo-Slavic conglomeration
of peoples, which has found itself suddenly blessed with freedom of
motion, expression and ambition, through the action of Italy that
brought about the disgregation of Austria, regards itself not only as
naturally entitled to the solid mass of southern Slav mainland thus
liberated from Austrian control, but to the Italian part of the Adriatic
shores as well ; and even includes, in an extreme sweep of desire, cities
and districts where the Italian majority is indisputable, on the ground
that there is heavy Slavic admixture in their surroundings. And,
moreover, on the ground that Italy claims for herself in the final peace
settlement, and as an integral part of "Italia Irredenta," certain dis-
tricts and territories of the eastern Adriatic coast where there is an
[370]
THE ADRIATIC IRREDENTA
actual numerical majority of Slavic inhabitants, it brings against Italy
an accusation of "imperialism" and blames Italy's "ambitions" on
the Pact of London.
Before we proceed further in our attempt to make plain the situ-
ation, it is well to state, therefore, that even the much-abused "pact of
London" (as every fair-minded reader of published news must know
by this time, and as others always forget to remember), does not by
any means claim for Italy the whole of the Adriatic or insist upon
making it a closed sea. In fact, the long strip of coast, from south of
Fiume to north of Zara, including the ports of Segua and Carlopago,
besides minor ones, a coastland that is neither generally Italian nor
specifically Venetian in character has never been claimed by Italy.
Also, to that other length of coast, that, roughly speaking, goes from
south of Spalato to south of Ragusa (though it is teeming with Italian
memories and studded with tokens of Italian irradiation and civiliza-
tion), Italy makes no territorial claim, fully recognizing the legitimate
desire of the Serbs and Southern Slavs generally to something more
in the way of ports and outlets on the sea than the strictly Croatian
coast of the north, to which we have alluded above. Thus the three
racial branches of the Slavic people, Croats and Slovenes in the north-
ern Adriatic, Serbians in the southern, are fairly dealt with and fully
protected and provided for in the terms of the pact of London, which
represents actually a minimum of Italian rights and necessities in the
Adriatic. This will readily be seen by anyone remembering that by
such an agreement the stronghold of Catharo, the strongest naval
base not only of the Adriatic but of the Mediterranean, would remain
out of Italian hands. If Italy wanted to be imperialistic, she would
ask for Catharo first. Instead, she asks for Zara, which, if anything,
is sentimental. Also, with what seems almost too much of a renuncia-
tion even for the sake of peace and good will to neighbors, the city of
Fiume had not been considered, it appears, in the London agreements.
And yet the city of Fiume has just recently and very explicitly made
known her desire to join Italy on grounds of population (26,000
Italians and 6,000 citizens of Italy against 12,000 Slavonians and 6,400
Magyars), and asked for allied ratification of her act of self-deter-
mination at proper time.
All of these cities had Italian mayors and councils (as the intel-
lectual and civic leadership is Italian everywhere) which had been
suspended from office at the outbreak of the war, and who have been
reinstated by the people as soon as the breakdown of Austria allowed.
[371]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
More could be said, and in fact ought to be said, but we will con-
tent ourselves with recalling here the clear language of Roman law :
"Quod subreptum erit, eins rei aeterna auctoritas esto" [The right of
the owner over the thing that has been stolen is enduring] . Similarly,
all the former Austrian territories now reclaimed were once Italian,
"once" including the very recent past, we might say, the "present" of
yesterday. What they are "now" is the result of Austrian malprac-
tice with them. A considerable portion of non-Italian elements
included in them to-day represents, in other words, the colonization of
Austria, a colonization designed and achieved with non-Austrian
elements for definitely Austrian purposes, namely, the eviction of
Italians from their racial and ancestral homes and the accomplishment
of the final destruction of Italian nationality within Austrian borders
as a political consequence of the Austrian system of domination: a
system against which, we may incidentally remember, this war has
been fought and won ; a system against which Italian martyrs in the
Trentino as well as in Istria and Dalmatia have been protesting for
years with the sacrifice of life and of all that life holds dearest in
moral and material values.
That the Slavic elements of yesterday, the Slovenes, Croatians,
etc., of the Austrian period, the Jugo-Slavs of to-day, were only too
often the chosen retainers and the willing instruments of Austria in
her enterprise, is a fact which Italy may agree to consider foreclosed
to-day in view of present events, but which cannot, unfortunately, be
blotted out of history, even though we place it to the discredit of the
last years of Austria rather than to that of the pre-history of Jugo-
slavia.
Italy, whose human sympathies have been broadened by suffering,
and who least of all could wish the perpetuation of iniquity, is willing
to let bygones be bygones and meet the Jugo-Slavs in a friendly spirit.
But to her the tragedy of Dalmatia is a tragedy of her national life,
and the redemption of the Irredenta and the freedom of the Adriatic
are essentials of her very existence. She cannot, therefore, admit or
consent to wholesale ratification of Austria's misdeeds, such as the
Jugo-Slav extremists and their supporters would impose upon her with
the outcry they raise against the legitimate assertion of her rights on
the Adriatic Sea.
" Something is rotten " somewhere in the would-be-accusing
formula of " Italian imperialism," and in the intentionally confusing
statements that are being scattered around by more or less irrespon-
[372]
THE ADRIATIC IRREDENTA
sible agencies. As, unless she be expected to betray the highest ideals
of her national life and the most essential responsibilities of history
and civilization, Italy cannot be expected to submit to and ratify the
results arrived at by procedure of this kind ; she cannot accept a test
by statistics that have been made to order by such means ; she cannot,,
after having been compelled for thirty years by the unfortunate situa-
tion of the triple alliance to watch in silence the sufferings of her
children who were being dispossessed and decimated, refuse to help
them now and restore for them the ancestral homes which they
defended with such heroism and from which they were all but ousted
by foul means when the war began. No other nation has a longer list
of actual martyrs for the idea of liberty, not men whose words, to use
a brilliant recent phrase, did cut like swords, but men who were
actually cut by swords because of the words of freedom they said.
If other men cannot sleep in Flanders fields unless the sacred pledge
be kept by those who survive, what of the men and the women, and
the children, for Austria did not balk at that what of the martyrs
from Gorizia, from Trieste, from Fiume, from Spalato, from Zara,
among whom Sauro, Battisti, Rismondo, Chiesa, FiJzi and their com-
rades are but a few ? *
"This article was written for THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HJSTOEY in the late spring
of 1919.
[373]
Jffetlfema in % Itattrti
BY
GEORGE CREEL
Formerly Chairman of the Committee on Public Information
HE ITALIANS in the United States are about four
per cent, of the whole population, but the list of casual-
ties on the battle front shows a full ten per cent, of
Italian names. More than three hundred thousand
Italians figured on the Army list, and in defense of
the inner lines as well as on the firing lines they
proved their devotion to their adopted country. There
was no shipyard, ammunition factory, airplane factory, steel mill,
mine, lumber-camp, or dock in which the Italians did not play a large
part, and often the most prominent part, in actual and efficient work.
In some places, such as mines and docks, the Italians reached fully
thirty per cent, of the total number of employes, working at all times
with full and affectionate loyalty toward the Government of the
United States. For instance, when a strike was threatened in one of
the big industrial centres, it was an Italian who jumped on a box and
cried: " If you leave work now, you will be as though you were
sneaking back out of a trench, abandoning your comrades at the time
of a fight when they need you most." And the strike was averted.*
* Reproduced in THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY through the courtesy of Every-
body's Magazine.
[374]
(Hauour anft >latt0
BY
SENATOR FRANCESCO RUFFINI
Minister of Education in the Italian Cabinet That Declared War;
Rector of the University of Turin; a Foremost Italian
Authority on International Subjects
N SOME of the greatest men of the Italian Risorgi-
mento the Slavs, under the domination of the Haps-
burgs, met with perfect judges of their unnatural and
unhappy political situation and fervent supporters of
their sacred national demands. In the case of Mazzini
this is so well known as to have become a common-
place; and the Slavs themselves venerated him and
appealed to him as one of the apostles of their cause. Yet even to-day
there are many people who at the mere mention of any of the causes
defended by Mazzini either become frightened or smile sardonically,
as if it were a question of a conspiracy or of some impracticable
dream. They are unaware of the fact and with them a very large
number of other people that upon this point Count Cavour was in
the fullest agreement with Mazzini.
With regard to a politician who was always in the very thickest
of the fight, it is more difficult to summarize his ideas and attitude in
respect to a vast and complex question than it is with a thinker, and
particularly a thinker so great and so unperturbed about consequences
as was Mazzini. But fortunately we possess two manifestoes of Count
Cavour's opinions which stand, the one at the beginning of his political
career, and the other at its termination, and they are in such perfect
agreement that our present purpose is rendered singularly easy. We
are assisted also by the curious circumstance that in the one case, as
in the other, he found himself confronted by the same man Lorenzo
Valeric.
We start with the great discussion in the Sub-Alpine Chamber on
October 20, 1848, on the question of hastening or delaying the
resumption of hostilities against Austria. Among the various argu-
ments adopted by one side or the other, which there is no need to
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
enumerate, was that of the internal agitations within the Austrian
Monarchy. Count Cavour himself had no illusions at first about the
liberal character of the German and Hungarian movements. In one
of his articles in May he clearly showed that he did not despair that
they might be of benefit to the Italian rising and the liberation of
Poland. But the Pan-German fanaticism, and the hatred of Italian
independence, manifested afterwards in the Assembly of Frankfort,
and the opposition against the Italians as volunteers under the flag
of Radetzky, by the very students and Liberals who had raised the
barricades in Vienna, tore the veil from his eyes, and he perceived
the true state of affairs. He perceived the truth, which, in its sub-
stance, has remained absolutely unaltered since it was revealed by
Cavour himself seventy years ago. I quote from the Parliamentary
reports :
" But in the Austrian Empire, the question of liberty, the political
question, is not the only one which causes agitation and moves the
popular masses. In close association with this there is another, much
more serious and more threatening, namely, the great struggle of the
races, the one group endeavoring to maintain an ancient predominance
and the other striving to acquire a new nationality. There exists in
the Empire a numerous, energetic, courageous race, the Slavs, who
have suffered under centuries of oppression. This race extends in
all the eastern parts of the Empire, from the banks of the Danube to
the mountains of Bohemia ; it desires to obtain its complete emancipa-
tion, to reconquer its nationality. Its cause is just and noble. That
cause is defended by rugged, but daring and energetic masses, and
therefore it is destined to triumph in a not far distant future.
" The great Slav movement has inspired the first poet of the cen-
tury, Adam Mikievitz, and by this fact we are induced to repose com-
plete faith in the destinies of those peoples ; because history teaches us
that when Providence inspires one of those great geniuses, like Homer,
Dante, Shakespeare, or Mikievitz, it is a proof that the peoples in
whose midst they arise are called to a high destiny.
" However that may be, shortly after the triumph of the Liberal
cause in Vienna, the Slav movement began to manifest itself openly
in the Empire. The most intelligent branch of the Slav family, the
inhabitants of Bohemia, have been attempting since the month of April
to release themselves from Germanic domination, and to establish in
Prague a centre around which the whole of Slavism might unite itself.
That generous enterprise failed; all the parties in Vienna united to
[376]
CAVOUR AND THE SLAVS
repress the Bohemian movement. The unhappy city of Prague
attempted to have recourse to force, but it was vanquished after a
desperate struggle ; it was placed under the military yoke and governed
by martial la\v, which was still in force only a few days ago.
" Repressed by brutal force in the north of the Empire, the Slav
movement spread more vigorously, more menacingly, and with greater
power in the south, in the Danubian provinces, inhabited by the Slavo-
Croats. I will not set out here to examine the causes and the pretexts
which gave rise to the Croatian movement against Hungary. I do not
wish to enter into the particulars of the great struggle which is waging
between the Magyars and the Slavs ; I will only remind the Chamber
that the Magyars, noble and generous when it is a question of defend-
ing the rights of their nationality against Imperial arrogance, have
always shown themselves to be haughty, tyrannical, and oppressive
towards the Slav race inhabiting the provinces of Hungary.
" Yes, gentlemen, nobody can deny that in Hungary the aristoc-
racy belongs to the Magyar race, the people to the Slav race, and that
in that kingdom the aristocracy has always oppressed the people. But
it is not my intention to make the apologia of the Croats, and not even
that of their brave leader, the Ban Jellachich. I confine myself to
the observation that the banner which they have unfurled is the Slav
banner, and not, as others suppose, the standard of reaction and
despotism. Jellachich has availed himself of the name of the Emperor,
and in that he has shown himself an astute politician. But that does
not prove that his principal, if not his sole object, is not the restoration
of the Slav nationality. What, in fact, is the Imperial power? A
vain shadow, of which the parties which divide the Empire avail them-
selves in turn. Jellachich, seeing the Emperor at variance with the
Viennese, declared himself on the side of the Central Power, but not
for the rebuilding of the Gothic political edifice which was brought to
the ground by the March revolution.
" In order to prove that the movement of Jellachich is not a mere
military reaction, it is sufficient to observe that when he approached
Vienna, the Slav deputies, and more particularly those of Bohemia,
who represent the enlightened part of Slavism, left the Assembly, with
the intention of retiring to Prague or Brunn and establishing a Slav
parliament there. Hence I believe that the struggle which is now rag-
ing in Austria is not a political struggle, like that of March, but rather
the prelude to a terrible war of races, the war of Germanism against
Slavism."
[377]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
From this conception of the internal struggles of Austria in
exact contradiction to that of his opponents, whose eyes were set on
political liberty, whereas he looked for national liberty Cavour drew
a conclusion which can hardly be called opposite to but rather different
from that of the others. He maintained that it would be better for the
Italians, without taking the side of one party or the other, to wait and
see. Hence they should defer the resumption of the war, but cer-
tainly should not abandon the idea.
Twelve years later, towards the end of 1860, Count Cavour is no
longer the simple and very unpopular deputy against whom the public
in the galleries had solemnly murmured on that now distant evening
of October 29, 1848. He is President of the Council, with a world-
wide reputation and enjoying the respect even of his adversaries. His
mind is completely occupied by the resumption of the mortal game
against Austria which has been so bluntly and painfully cut short the
year before by the Peace of Villafranca. And in his game an im-
portant card is represented by Hungary. On the very day of the battle
of Solferino and San Martino, he had had the first of those interviews
with Louis Kossuth which Lorenzo Valerio being the intermediary
- were to be continued until the untimely death of the Count, leaving
in the memory of the Magyar agitator the deepest impression and the
most unforgettable regret. But in the policy of Count Cavour towards
Hungary two things are to be noted. They are, in the first place, the
constant preoccupation of the Count that the simultaneous movements
for the liberation of Italy and Hungary must be accompanied by an
agreement with the Slavs of the Monarchy for a simultaneous action
against the House of Austria, and, in the second place, the not less con-
stant preoccupation that Hungary must not yield to the enticements
of Austria and come to an agreement with her for a Dualistic consti-
tution, and thus become again the most faithful supporter of the Haps-
burg throne, which Cavour picturesquely represented in his interviews
with Kossuth, asking him at every meeting whether Hungary was not
in danger of again adopting the motto: Moriamur pro rege nostro!
It was, in fact, the Hungary of Kossuth with which the Count intended
to collaborate, not the Hungary which afterwards allowed herself to
be imprisoned in the Compromiso of 1867, the Hungary, that is to say,
of to-day, in which Kossuth refused to live and did not wish to die.
Valerio had become a useful assistant to Count Cavour. At the
end of 1860 we find him Royal Commissary Extraordinary for the
Marches of Ancona. In that capacity he wanted to maintain for the
[378]
CAVOUR AND THE SLAVS
Austrian Lloyd, which had a branch at Trieste, those privileges which
it had enjoyed under the Papal Government, both in regard to the port
of Ancona and the Adriatic coast. And of this Cavour approved in
a letter dated October 30, 1860, in which he said:
" You have done very well in preserving for the Lloyd the favors
which it enjoyed, and may issue the appropriate decree. It is very
useful to maintain good and active connections with Trieste, which,
according to what I am told, is becoming less Fedelissima and more
Italiana. I say this not because I am thinking of an early annexation
of that town, but because it is useful to sow where our children may
be able to reap."
On November 8th Valeric issued the decree, in which he included
the following generous but imprudent declaration :
" Considering that the enormous capital of which the said com-
pany disposes is to a large extent Italian, and that the town in which
it has offices has given many and by no means dubious proofs that it
regards itself as belonging to Italy rather than Germany, to which it
was forcibly ascribed by the treaties," etc., etc.
The heavens opened, and a torrent of bitter recriminations from
the Prussian Government rained upon Turin, in whose jurisdiction
Trieste was included. In these documents it was rudely asserted that
Trieste was a ville allcmandc, and that consequently to attribute Italian
sentiments to her was a gratuitous accusation that she wished to betray
patrie commune. It was declared that Prussia, who had remained
quiet in face of the " troubles " by which the Peninsula had been
agitated for some time, would have to take action if there was any
danger of a violation of the Frontieres allemandes. Finally it was
asked whether the incriminated decree reflected the intentions of the
Government, and, if not, that it should be rectified.
Count Cavour had to give the required explanations, but as for
rectifications, he ordered none. Hence the decree has remained such
as it was, with its patriotic declaration, and was included in the col-
lection of the laws and degrees of the Kingdom of Italy.
I379J
Stalg'a
BY
LUIGI SICILIANI
Author and Poet
T LAST, after seven years, it was given to me once
again to set eyes on the wonderful man whom I had
so admired in my extreme youth and recently had
learned to love, Gabriele D'Annunzio. I remember
that, having known him and heard him speak some-
what late in my career, when my acute desire to know
him had waned and I had an unaccountable dread of
making his acquaintance, I underwent no delusions : he had given me
the impression of perennial freshness, the freshness of the perfume
he one day in jest poured on my rough handkerchief.
I saw him for the first time one evening in the house of his old
publisher. There I was forced I realized it later on to recite verses
as in an examination. At the moment, the last person who suspected
it was the examinee, and perhaps also the examiner. In those days
he was preparing for the Italian stage the only drama of our literature
in which the elements of Greek tragedy are felt to live again, a drama
in which the intelligent spectator has the sensation of assisting at the
work of a direct disciple of the famous and eternal Three. Both
proper stage management and suitable actors were lacking for this
tragedy. After a rapid tour of the principal theatres of the peninsula,
the play took refuge in the heaven of unappreciated masterpieces.
Against it arose unexpected experts of antiquity, and professors in
search of, or waiting for, posts. All to no purpose. The poet could
repeat to himself :
"E quella non umana, non divina
consanguinea di eterni or sente in se'
una divinita' che irraggia 1' Ade !"
Phaedra has taken its place among the great shades of phantasy.
Not many months after I saw him again, in the same city. He had
become the first Italian chronicler of the airplane. He spoke of it
with enthusiasm and knowledge, hymning, "Man, lord of the universe."
[380]
ITALY S SOLDIER-POET
I assisted at his frugal meal of cold meat, washed down with no other
wine than that of his inexhaustible wit and his smile. I saw him
no more.
Then followed bitterness, ingratitude, exile. Paris caught him
in the whirl of its unreal and fashionable life; but often he fled from
it to live his own life in the solitude of the pines that brought to his
memory other pines on the shores of the "Amarissimo."* Some men
of many letters looked at him with the eye of the merchant, and he had
no lack, either, of willing reporters or of lady artists unskilled even in
the use of their chalks. But the death of two friends, of a poet humble
on the heights, and of a simple believer of great, sane, provincial
France, broke the charm and initiated him into the mysteries, and
when the trumpets of war roused Europe he was ready: "Cave,
adsum," said the Latin to the Teuton.
I know he is the prodigal son. I know he has skirted all the quick-
sands, tempted all the fates, drunk at all the fountains, cast anchor in
all ports. He knows the wealth of tropical forests and the icy squalor
of the poles, and has brought back in his boats the spices and perfumes
of the most remote lands. He has trampled on many old laws, seek-
ing (or following) his own. He is the prince of wanderers. But he
has not forgotten the flame of his hearth, nor the smoke which feath-
ers from the chimney of his native roof. For a thousand things I
admire him ; for this I love him.
He has been intoxicated with visions, with images, with sounds
and colors ; he had been caught in the nets of Eros, so pleasant to toy
with, so painful to extricate oneself from; but in the hour of trial he
has been found in the front rank, first among the first, joyous in
renunciation, armed with his naked soul, with his iron will, with his
hard love of destiny. Pardon him, ye pedants and professors, for
the Book commands to pardon : quia multum amavit. Do not blame
him for all the human folly and stupidity which has trailed after him.
Remember the strong, who have held him dear, and those who have
understood him fully and have followed him. Remember that the
choicest food of which he has eaten has been that bread offered him
by an unknown soldier from his native Abruzzi on the night of
an advance.
He has given himself up to external things. He has lived in
them utterly. He has slumbered amidst vanities. But when the
* Amarissimo is the name given by D'Anmmzio to the Adriatic.
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
bugle sounded he heard it, while others had ears only for the croaking
of frogs. And for this, in the hour of trial, he has passed safely
through the fiery furnace.
For days and days he has not thought, but only felt. Do not
reproach him, ye custodians of Italian thought, who, when the hour
of decision came, sighed for the Valkyries. Do not reproach him, you
epigonies of him who offered the briar-thorn to Giovanni Pascoli,
whilst he offered him, as prize of the contest, a golden chain and the
wings of the ode.
Others, other heroic charlatans, sit brooding in unctuous cow-
ardice and live on words sold to the highest bidder. He, in the hour
of peril, embraced daring; and in the apprenticeship of hard service
prepared himself for the ascent.
When we stood before him I thought my words would stick for-
ever in my throat. His Excellency, an old and intimate acquaintance
of his, relieved me of my embarrassment. He looked at me with his
sound eye and remembered me when he heard my name. He held out
his hand. A feeling of respect for the uniform we both wore pre-
vented me from bending and kissing it. Clicking one heel against the
other, I drew myself up and held out my hand. I have never been
more grateful to the Regulations than then, for they contained within
the stiffness of the subordinate my inward flood of emotion.
We spoke. He was still shuddering at the affront that the nation
recently suffered. He praised with profound emotion and a paternal
heart the youths of the class of 1899, the springtime of our blood,
consecrated forever to glory. He described their deep, invincible
sleep in the open, impervious to danger. He then enumerated the most
urgent necessities of the country. The love of Rome and of the Latin
race vibrated in every word, for it was the secret substance which
nourished his thoughts.
Night fell. His faithful soldier-servant, Rosignoli, lit some
candles in the room. The face of the poet, above the white collar of
the Novara lancers, seemed to me emaciated and illuminated, as that
of an ascetic. I thought once more of that true remark of Giacomo
Leopardi's the master to whom I owe everything that those who
set themselves to write great things do so from want of great actions
to perform.
This man, who had dominated Italian and European literature
as an undisputed master, renewing himself always, loved action above
[3821
ITALY S SOLDIER-POET
all things. He spoke in burning words. It was the mind which stayed
the hand, ready for other work.
He has been reproached, as for a fault, for his richness, his full-
ness, and for the stupidity of those who knew not how to use it. But
the vine cannot be blamed for those who know not how to use its
fruit.
How many skins have been filled with his wine? How many
songless throats have been intoxicated with it? How many people
have lived still live to fatten on the crumbs of his literary achieve-
ments ? And how many people levy toll from them ?
Ask of the artist that which the artist has to give; and if you
know how, give yourselves. Let each one live and love in his own way,
but let him Hve and love !
This poet, who could say with much more reason than Th6ophile
Gautier, "I am one for whom the visible world exists," has preferred
the soul to matter, the inextinguishable lamp of faith to all the colors
and changes of the shifting waves. He is a Christian.
The Italian sun has sweetness, the Italian soil has beauty; and
her sons for centuries have enriched it with ever new beauties. Not
a book, not a picture, not a statue, not a building, but this man has
sought it out and loved it. And yet on that evening he said to me:
"We must not surrender Venice. Better destroy it." And he spoke
the truth. Had we then surrendered Venice we should have preserved
her stones, and destroyed the best part of ourselves, the soul by which
those stones themselves have life.
[383]
(JDto toil? (iartett, Km fork
BY
CHARLES NEVERS HOLMES
Where sheltered ocean laves Manhattan's shore
And southern Broadway looms like canyon'd street,
Where Castle Clinton stood in years of yore
Like sentinel awaiting hostile fleet,
Where silence reigns beside a business roar,
And once in myriads from foreign strand,
Like strangers through some hospitable door,
The aliens passed, were welcomed to our Land,
Old Castle Garden stands, its age sixscore :
A quaint Aquarium where fashion's throng
Heard famous artists who are now no more,
The Swedish Nightingale's sweet, soulful song.
Alone it stands, its long life almost o'er,
Where sheltered ocean laves Manhattan's shore.
[384]
[385]
.
v
i-
X.AKA. UKDKKMEI) CITY OF IALMATIA
1. Interior of Kara Cathedral
2. The Cathedral
3. A Venetian Castle at Arhe, near Xara
4 The Church of Saint (Irisojjono
.-,. The <}:itc of the City
(1. Courtyard of a residence
| .WX I
TRIESTE
1. The harbor
2. Art-Ji of Ilk'oartlo
.1. Door of the Cainpauile
I Kemalni of Uomim striK-ture in the Campanile,
or Bell-TowiT of the Cathedral
[389]
BUILDINGS IN TWO DALMATIAN CITIES, SERENICO AND TRAU
1. The Cathedral at Sebenlco
2. The Cathedral at Trail
3. Carving on Sebanlco Cathedral
I. Kntrancc to the Municipal Ruilding, Trail
5. The Cathedral Door, Sebenico
[392]
1IEK MAJESTY. THE QUEEN OF ITALY, IN THE GAHB OF A HED CROSS NURSE
[393J
's
QKEAT ITALIANS OF TO-KAV
King Victor Emanuel III (top, to left)
Queen Elena, In the uniform of a Red Cross nurse (top, to right)
General Armando Diaz (rentro)
Admiral Umberto Cagni, Governor of Fiume (bottom, to left)
General Petittl dl Roretto, Governor of Trieste (bottom, to right)
[396]
TUISKK TUK.NTINO PATRIOTS MI "It I iKUKI I'.V TIIK Al'STIt IANS
oitl.AMiii AM- BONNINO I-"|:MKI; i -i: I : \l 1 1 : i: \\l |->i:i:i(iN MINISTER OF ITALY
[397
;
THE CATHEDRAL OP TKKNTO
the Wnr tin' Austrinns imprisoned Itishop Enilrlci of Trento for bis patriotism.
He lins been compared, " for nobility and loftiness of character," to the
valiant, riiristian hero. Cnrdhml Mercler.
CASTl.K OF MCOX CONSICLIti. TUKNTo
[400|
OUfurrl? in
fckrtdj of % to World flarialj OUfurrij in Vijirlj fflor01jijijno tip
Attreatora of th,* American Stockton IFamUg
BY
H. H. STOCKTON
|VEN in England it is difficult now to find a village
with old church, market-cross, thatched roof cottages,
and neighbouring manor-houses, much as they were
in Tudor days, and still more surprising to find one
a mile or more from the nearest railroad.
But such a village a Rhodes Scholar of Oxford
found Malpas in Broxton Hundred, fourteen miles
from Chester. He was choosing a quiet place to do his " reading "
during the " long." He found the nearest way was by motor from
Chester, but when could a poor scholar afford a motor ?
He could go by boat on the River Dee to Eccleston Ferry for
Eaton Hall or Farndon, and then by bicycle for eight or ten miles, or
from Chester by railway with a mile's walk between Cheshire hedge-
rows to Malpas.
This information the efficient, and, always before, helpful Mr.
Baedeker, failed to give him, but the Scholar wished to see the
little village of Malpas, as it was the home of his ancestors before their
coming to America, and where the church, with its family pew,
brasses, tablets, and monuments still stood.
It was not the first return of one of the family to the land of his
fathers; but the others had come in less humble guise. In 1766 one
ancestor had been sent on a delicate mission to the Court of St. James,
when he wrote back :
" Whenever I can serve my native country I leave no occasion
untried. Dear America, thou sweet retreat from greatness and cor-
ruption ! In thee I choose to live and die."
[401]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
Again he had gone to Scotland and successfully sought a Presi-
dent for an infant university, and afterward these names had been
side by side on the Declaration of Independence. Still another an-
cestor, a Commodore in the United States Navy, had, with the tact
and diplomacy of an older nation, and with great personal bravery,
restored cordial relations between England and Liberia.
The Scholar, however, was disappointed to find that the manor-
house of his forefathers was converted into a farm for the manufac-
tory of the famous Cheshire cheese. But his amour propre was some-
what restored by finding that part of the broad acres of the Manor de
Stockton had descended through " Isabella de Stockton, heiress of the
[then] over-lord of Stockton, in the reign of King Henry VI., in the
parish of Malpas," to her descendant, the present Duke of Westmin-
ister, so that the Victorian-Gothic Eaton Hall (of 1874) now marks
part of the grant of 1250.
In spite of Cheshire having lost many distinguished houses during
the civil wars, Malpas appears to have escaped, and still has its Tudor
and Jacobian show places within easy walking distance : Edge Hall,
Broxton Hall, Lower Garden, and Garden Hall (only recently burnt to
the ground). The three last are country seats almost unaltered of the
Tudor period; but, like many other English hamlets, the church is
the centre about which the cottages and the little shops not only cluster,
but where the interests of " gentle and simple " for many generations
alike had led, as does the steep paved High Street, with its over-hang-
ing little gabled houses past the market-cross and " The Crown "
[Inn], ending always at the church door. Here they have come in
times of joy and sorrow, and have found their last resting-place under
the shadow of the yew at the gate, or in the sunshine beneath the sun-
dial of the tower.
This church dedicated to the Royal St. Oswald was first
used as a chapel by the followers of St. Bernard of Cluny, in the
Middle Ages. The square, low tower of red sandstone suggests an
early Norman date. Otherwise, it is a good example of the enriched
Gothic of the latter part of Henry VII, with nave, chancels, and side
aisles. These are divided from the nave by six lofty arches, resting
on clustered columns, and terminate in two smaller chancels. These
[402]
THE OLD CHURCH IN liALPAS
chancels were erected by two county families, as were also rood-
screens, gallery-font, and twelve ancient dark oak stalls. The inscrip-
tions in English and Latin show that they were put in loving memory
of those who had lived as children of the Church. One is struck by
the love of these people for God's house. Every thing is a gift, even
the wainscoting within the Communion-rail. Some of the names are
well known in America today: Lord Curzon, Cholmondely of Chol-
mondely Hall, and Sir Philip Edgerton. There is a large eastern
window partly concealed by a gallery, under which stands the stone
font but the windows are largely filled with common glass, showing
that St. Oswald's Church at Malpas suffered for loyalty to King
Charles, as did its more pretentious neighbour at Chester.
The roof is of carved wood, with beams ornamented with foliage,
and the squares, formed by the crossing of the rafters, filled with
quarter-foil. In the tower are six bells with inscriptions. The largest
was given by Sir Randle Brereton, Knight, of Malpas Hall, 1508.
The Cholmondely chancel is divided from the north aisle by a richly
carved oaken screen, with Latin inscription. The Edgerton chancel
is divided from the south aisle in the same way, but here the inscrip-
tion is in quaint English, placed there in 1522, which makes this
request :
" Pray good people for the prosperous
estate of Sir Randulph Brereton, of
Thys werke edificatour, wyth his wife
dame Helenour, and after thys lyfe
transytorie to obtaine eternal felicitie.
Amen, Amen." *
This is the last we hear of the name inside of the church. His
son, Sir William, like his father a chamberlain of Henry VIII, was
beheaded in 1536, and his descendant, another Sir William, took the
side of the Parliament that did so much to deface, and not build,
*On the death of Dame Eleanor, the tolls of Malpas and part of the ifesm- Manor
passed to the Stocktons.
The tenants of Stockton attended the Leet of Malpas.
In the 34th year of Edward I, the Stocktons held land in Stockton and in Cnddington,
or Kiddington.
These statements are found in Omerod's hisiory of Cheshire.
[403]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
churches. Within sight of St. Oswald's, near Malpas, this Sir
William commanded the Parliamentary army in a battle against
Prince Rupert with his Cavaliers (Aug 2, 1644), the Cavaliers sus-
taining serious loss.
In the south aisle are freestone mural tablets, more quaint and
interesting than beautiful, but even in these we find epitaphs less
stilted and less verbose than those of later times. There is one for a
John Stockton who must have lived in troublous times between Church
and State and may have grieved over Mary Queen of Scots' tragic
end. His gilded tablet, in Latin, reads; I Stocktonus pads Semper
placid esimus Autor. Sub duro situs hie marmore pace fruor."
[]. Stockton, ever a gentle promoter of peace, is here laid under the
hard marble to enjoy peace, died December 2, A. D. 1610.] Nearby
the Scholar found his family pew, with the date, 1630, and, in the rich
carving, he was pleased to see the same Coat-of-Arms with Crest used
on the book-plate and seal that had descended from father to son for
the last eight generations of his family. That branch of the Stocktons
had come to America leaving its roots behind in the old Church in
Malpas.
In the autumn of 1657, George Fox had stopped in Malpas on his
way from Swarthmore Hall to Chester, and soon after the Scholar's
ancestor had joined a Quaker Colony in America.
Sometime later 1687 William Penn was speaking on the decla-
ration in the open air tennis-court at Chester before King James II and
many others who were not Quakers. We can easily believe that some
of our good churchmen from Malpas listened to him, and, perhaps,
sent letters by him to their brothers in the New World where they had
sought liberty of thought and peace of mind. It was shortly after
Penn's return to America, 1701, that he gave a grant of 5,500 acres
of land to the Scholar's family here.*
The living at Malpas was instituted in 1285, the first Rector
being William de Andelym. Then follows in the church records a long
list until the present day, giving the names also of their patrons.
* " William Penn's grants were generally bought from the Indians by measure of what
a man could walk in a day, about 20 miles. The Governor of Pennsylvania did some of
flheae walks himself." "Life of William Penn," by J. W. Graham.
[404]
THE OLD CHURCH IN MALPAS
Many of these Rectors held high positions in the Church, and their
names were also in Doomsday-Book and in the Visitations.
One Rector, in 1623, Doctor Thomas Dod, of Shoclack Castle,
Cheshire, appointed by the King, James I, was chaplain to the King,
Archdeacon of Richmond, Dean of Ripon, Prebendary of Chester,
and Rector of Astbury. Another Rector was William Dod, A.M., of
Edge Hall, 1680. He was educated at Wadham College, Oxford
University (the Scholar's college). Here, over a century later,
Bishop Heber was born, his father being a Rector of Malpas.
It is a curious coincidence that one of the early Rectors of ths
church built by the Scholar's family in America on part of their
original grant from William Penn should be a William Dod, D.D.
He was a descendant of the Rector of the same name in Malpas, and
married an ancestress of the Scholar's, connecting by marriage, after
many generations, the two families who had been neighbors in
Cheshire and had occupied adjoining pews in Malpas Church.*
Through the kindness of the present Rector of Malpas, the
Reverend Lawrence Armitstead, the Scholar has been able to obtain
a stone from St. Oswald's, which has been presented to the vestry
to be used in the new chancel in his church in America, making the
link still stronger between the new and the old church. The inscrip-
tion on this stone is a family motto which is frequently seen carved
in stone and wood HI the Malpas Church, "Omnia Deo Pendent"
Since this was written, the beautiful new chancel of Trinity
Church, Princeton, New Jersey (Ralph Adams Cram, Architect), was
opened for the first time on Christmas Day, and the Malpas stone put
in place.
* " The Oaks in the township of Buxton or Broxton passed after the reign of Henry
III to a branch of the Dods and by female heirs successively to the families of Clayton,
Stockton, and Thickness." Lyson's Cheshire.
[405]
0f a (grrat lag
(Uclrhratunt of tlj? IFiftirtlj Annteraarg of ifyr Sattk of
linihrr SiUl In 1325 aa ^ T arralriJ in an
Cl>imr NruiBpaprr and flrrsmirfc in
an Anrirnt
CONTRIBUTED BY
CHARLES NEVERS HOLMES
|HE seventeenth of June, 1825, was a proud day for New
England. On that day was celebrated the fiftieth
anniversary of the battle of Bunker Hill. The place
of the event was the spot chosen for the celebration -
the survivors of the battle were to participate in the
scene Lafayette was to be present on the occasion
- Webster was to address the people the corner
stone of a Monument was to be laid with Masonic ceremonies
everything, in short, was to be done to render the day and the year
conspicuous in the annals of New England.
I rose at an early hour, and with thousands of others, from the
neighboring towns, repaired to the metropolis. I entered the city,
the sun rose brilliantly on its spires, and the bells and the cannon
mingled their loud and joyous voices to announce that the day was
arrived. Every mast and flag-staff now lifted up their star-spangled
banners - - of which not a few bore evident marks of a semi-century's
antiquity. The crowd continued to pour in from every quarter. Old
and young, the grey-headed and infirm children and grand-
children young men and maidens every class and description,
from fifty miles around, on foot, in waggons, and on horseback, were
seen urging their course towards the common in Boston the place
whence the procession was to take up its line of march. I have seen
mobs and crowds in other cities, but I have never witnessed a multi-
tude of people like that which was here assembled. A deep and im-
[406]
ADVENTURES OF A GREAT DAY
pressive silence prevailed through the whole throng, as, hour after
hour, it patiently and in the same place awaited the issuing forth from
the State House, of the old Revolutionary soldiers, with their veteran
commander, Lafayette, at their head. The countenance of each in-
dividual of that throng wore a look intelligent of the importance of the
event about to be celebrated.
At length the signal announced that everything was ready
there is no shouting no huzzas no tossing up of hands or waving
of hats ; all is still and quiet expectation stands tiptoe to catch the
first glimpse of the interesting scene, as the carriages successively
draw up in front of the State House, and receive each its compliment
of old soldiers, to convey them to the scene of their glory. I had sta-
tioned myself where I could see them distinctly as they passed. Each
had some time-worn badge some relic of the Revolution which he
wore on his person or displayed from the carriage. By one was
borne a tattered color, by another a dilapidated drum here was seen
a cocked hat, with its gilt mountings tarnished with age there a
knapsack or cartouch box, moth-eaten and crumbling to pieces -
some were dressed in their ancient regimentals, and some clad only
in homespun garments, similar to those they wore on the day of the
battle. As they passed along, the features of the old soldiers were
scanned by every eye gazed upon as living records of the events in
which they had participated records which now for the last time,
perhaps, were fore'ver to be seen.
The first and most interesting part of the procession having
passed me, I felt little inclination to witness the rest ; and, accordingly,
I joined the crowd which was already moving towards the heights of
Charlestown. We found the whole neighborhood pre-occupied by a
vast concourse of people. The hill-tops, steeples, houses and sheds
all around were alive with heads the battle ground was hedged
in by a dense crowd, which was kept from entering it by a double
row of guards. I was anxious to get within the lines, where I ob-
served a few more favored individuals were occasionally admitted,
but at every point where I tried to effect an entrance, I was uniformly
repulsed. The van of the procession was now arrived. I saw the old
soldiers trembling under fatigue and decrepitude, assisted down from
the carriages at the side of each walked a young man, upon whose
[407]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
arms many of the soldiers leaned for support. In this way, slowly
and with tottering steps, they marched the whole length of the field.
If any thing could bring up to the mind's eye the events of that day,
it was the scene now passing before me, and I gazed upon these
infirm old men, the venerable chroniclers of another age, with feel-
ings of gratitude and awe.
The remainder of the procession was now fast arriving. The
words of the poet, <4 What a length of tail behind," did not fail to recur
to me. There were the masons, dressed out with all their dazzling
paraphernalia the uniform companies of soldiers, with their gay
crests the marshals, swelling with the importance of their brief
authority the invited guests, smacking their lips with th<i thoughts
of a sumptuous dinner grave senators and beardless representa-
tives ministers of church and ministers of state, all full of import-
ance, and looking upon the crowd with that peculiar smile of com-
placent satisfaction with which the latter are on such occasions apt
to be regarded by the former. There was an air of aristocracy in the
appearance of things, altogether at variance with the feeling of the
great mass of spectators without. This feeling was exasperated to a
still greater pitch by an incident which occurred in the part of the
field where I stood : " All of which I saw, and in part of which I
was."
The hill on the side next to the road is surmounted by a street,
which, in some places, is many feet below its summit, being excavated
for this purpose, and a stone wall is raised against its side to protect
the earth from falling. It was on this wall I had taken my station
with the crowd, which continuing to increase, compelled us to en-
croach a little upon the line of demarcation. From this position the
guard attempted to remove us, but the necessity of our situation
caused us to set at defiance the strictness of military law. Finding
themselves too weak to carry their point, one of their number was
despatched for a reinforcement.
In a short space of time, down came a whole company of soldiers,
led by their commander, who, as they approached, gave the word to
charge bayonets. The cry was given on our part for quarter but it
was not respected there would be little glory in restoring a body
of citizens to order in so peaceable a manner no laureals would be
[408]
ADVENTURES OF A GREAT DAY
gained in so civil-like a proceeding. On they came, at full charge, a
whole phalanx of youthful soldiers, whose maiden weapons were now
for the first time to be signalized in actual service. On they came,
and over the wall went the whole crowd that had just before occupied
it, helter skelter, heels over head, full ten feet or more, into the street
below. The scene of rage and confusion that ensued cannot easily
be described. For myself, I am a most pacific man a peacemaker
in every sense of the word but I must confess my indignation was
so aroused by this transaction, that, in the heat of the moment, I
seized hold of a stone and was just on the point of hurling it upon
the aggressors, when my better judgment deterred me from the act.
Many of my fellow sufferers, however, were not disposed to keep the
peace so much as myself, and actually took the vengeance which I
had only meditated.
Thus far, we had been exceedingly passive, obedient and tract-
able but a chord was now touched that would not easily cease to
vibrate the blood of a Yankee is emphatically cold and sluggish, but
once arouse it, and you might as easily stay the waves on the sea shore
as check its progress. I almost feared the consequences of this mili-
tary exploit, for I perceived among my companions a stout determina-
tion to carry their object.
It was impossible to regain the walls from behind, but the word
had gone forth to regain the interior of the lines or to be revenged
upon our assailants. We moved on in a body, and were joined in our
march by others. We soon reached a point where there was no wall
interposing between the street and the battle ground where was
nothing to check our progress but a slight fence and a guard of
soldiers. The former was soon overthrown, while the latter perceiv-
ing their bulwarks so easily and unceremoniously demolished, and
fearing perhaps the same fate themselves, gave way before us and suf-
fered us to pass. We were now in the field, a hundred men or more
the guards resumed their stations as soon as we had passed, and
thus all communication between ourselves and the street was entirely
cut off. We had passed the Rubicon and were determined not to retreat,
whether it was by accident or design I know not, but we formed our-
selves into a solid triangle the regular Grecian cunex a disposi-
tion of forces well adapted for the present emergency, whether for
[4091
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
forcing a further passage, or to resist an attempt, if made, to repel
us from our 'vantage ground. The latter attempt was made, but in
so bungling a manner it defeated its own end. On one side, and it was
that where I stood the charge was made by the cavalry, and on the
other two, the infantry made a simultaneous attack so that the
combined forces of these allied powers served only to concentrate our
ranks more closely together, without stirring us an inch from the
position we occupied.
In vain did the horseman brandish his sword in vain urge on
his prancing steed towards us there we stood, immoveable as a
rock. On the other side the bayonet was presented close to the breasts
of our men, but they could not be intimidated or forced to retire. In
a short time the retreat was sounded by our assailants, and we found
ourselves in undisturbed possession of the field.
The position we now occupied was in the immediate vicinity of
that where the corner stone of the monument was to be laid, the cere-
monies of which were already commenced, and which, where we stood,
could easily be discerned. But here we found a new antagonist in the
masons themselves, who seemed to regard our presence with jealousy
and suspicion. The only weapons, however, with which we carried on
our new warfare, were words, and with these some slight skirmishing
took place.
The ceremony of laying the corner stone was hardly completed,
when the procession began to move for the seats arranged on the
opposite side of the hill, at the foot of which the speaker was to address
the assembly. A simultaneous movement took place in our ranks,
with this difference, however, that as the former moved in regular
order, and at a slow march, the latter took up the double quick step,
and in Indian fashion scampered each where inclination led him. My
object was to secure a seat where I might hear the orator, who speak-
ing in the open air, would, I was aware, be heard only at a short dis-
tance. Accordingly, I posted myself in the row directly under the
forum some of my companions took the same seat with myself, and
others, those in the rear. No sooner were we comfortably seated, than
the procession approaches. A marshal pops upon the bench we occu-
pied, and brandishing his white paper wand, as does Chanticleer his
wings before crowing, cries out, in a lusty voice, " These seats are re-
[410]
ADVENTURES OF A GREAT DAY
served for the revolutionary heroes none but the old soldiers will
sit here!"
I have seen some service on Bunker Hill, thought I, remembering
the scene through which I had just passed, but I can hardly pass
muster among the veteran soldiers. With this reflection, I deemed it
wiser to make a virtue of necessity, and so resigned my seat for one
in the rear of it. The revolutionary soldiers took their places, and I
was congratulating myself on the seat I had secured, when the marshal
again made his appearance.
" These seats," said he, " are for the Senate and House of Repre-
sentatives they will be reserved accordingly ! "
Alas, though I must again pull up stakes and shift quarters, I
never can be mistaken for a senator, and as for a representative, I know
not whom I represent but my own individual self. There was no time
for reflection, and so with as good a grace as I could assume, I quit the
premises, and left the senate and house of representatives in quiet
occupation. This time, thought I, I will remove far enough from the
sphere of great men, and, accordingly, I selected a seat some removes
up the hill. But the big bugs continued to swarm in and around me on
all sides. Some confusion was beginning to take place, owing to a
failure of seats, when my evil genius, the marshal, with his white
emblem in his hand, presents himself before me, and in a voice none
the sweetest, exclaims, " These seats are reserved for the special use
of the clergy."
Finding it impossible to get a seat where I could remain un-
molested, I again repaired to the vicinity of the forum, and seated my-
self on the ground in the lane that was formed between two rows of
benches, where I was suffered to remain without further disturbance.
The prayer being said, and the hymn, composed by Pierpont for
the occasion, sung and a most glorious hymn it is the effect of it
as sung in the open air by ten thousand voices, to that noble old tune,
" Old Hundred," was the most sublime and impressive I remember
ever to have witnessed the orator commenced his harangue. I
hate personal descriptions, and therefore will not attempt to sketch the
bold outlines of Webster's countenance. I have seen and heard him on
other occasions, when his smile has seemed to me like that of the tiger
crouching ere he leaped upon his prey but now there was nothing of
[411]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
that ferocious look lurking in his countenance, but it was all openness,
benevolence and majesty.
I have nothing further to relate of my adventures that day
there is one incident,however, of which as I was an eye and an ear
witness, I may be permitted to testify as to its actual occurrence. It
has, never, I believe, found its way into the newspapers, but it will not,
I suppose, be regarded on that account as the less entitled to credit.
The orator was addressing the revolutionary soldiers in that eloquent
passage commencing, " Venerable men ! You have come down to us,
from a former generation." As he proceeds, he says to them, " You
are now, where you stood, fifty years ago, this very hour, with your
brothers, and your neighbors, shoulder to shoulder, in the strife for
your Country." This the orator pronounced in his most impressive
manner, and with his full dark eye fixed upon the veterans before him.
The appeal was so direct and powerful, that one of their number,
hoary-headed and infantile, lifts himself from his seat and commences
the narrative of his own personal reminiscences.
" Ye-e-s ! Ye-e-s ! " said he, " I remember all about it it was
this hour fifty years ago, I was fighting here I stood as it might
be there " pointing with his staff to a spot some rods off.
" Stop stop my friend," said the speaker, who had sus-
pended his discourse upon being thus singularly interrupted, " Stop,
till I have finished my story and then you shall tell yours."
But the old man did not seem to relish the proposition he had
told his story too often to listening ears to think it deserved to be
thus disregarded.
' I stood right there," he continued, " and it was there, up there,
that Warren fell "
Here the old soldier fell himself, overpowered by the hands of
his companions, who had some difficulty in preventing his rising
again.
The oration was continued without further interruption and
with thousands of others, I sat bareheaded under a burning sun, till
the services were completed.
[412]
attfo
Slmmtal nf Ammratt
VOLUME XIII, 1919
ACTIVE SILENCE OF THE
ITALIAN NAVY, THE. By
Rear-Admiral Count Massimi-
liano Lovatelli, Naval Attache
to the Royal Italian Embassy at
Washington 35
ADRIATIC "IRREDENTA,"
THE. By Amy A. Bernardy,
Litt. D., Universities of Rome
and Florence ; Writer and Lec-
turer on Italian Historical and
Sociological Subjects ; War-
time Volunteer Worker in Amer-
ica under the Royal Italian Em-
bassy 358
ADRIATIC SEA, COASTS OF
THE. Reproduced through the
Courtesy of Mr. Agostino de
Biasi, Editor of "II Carroccio,"
the Italian Review. Illustration 216
ADVENTURES OF A GREAT
DAY. Celebration of the Fif-
tieth Anniversary of the Battle
of Bunker Hill in 1825 As Nar-
rated in an Old-Time Newspaper
and Preserved in an Ancient
Scrap-Book. Contributed by
Charles Nevers Holmes 406
ALBANIA, ITALY'S GREAT
WORK IN. By Brigadier-Gen-
eral George P. Scriven, U. S. A. 117
ALPS, PEAKS OF THE ADA-
MELLO GROUP IN THE.
Scene of the Gallant Fighting
under Difficulties by the Alpini
Troops. Illustration 135
AMERICA IN ARMS, TO. By
Gabriele D'Annunzio. A Free
Rendering, by John R. Slater,
of the University of Rochester,
of the Latter Part of the Elo-
quent Ode to America Composed
by d' Annunzio for Italy's Cele-
bration of America's Independ-
ence Day, 1918 126
AMERICAN SEA CAPTAIN IN
THE REVOLUTION, AN.
The Personal Narrative of Cap-
tain Luther Little, before, dur-
ing, and after the Revolutionary
War Transcribed from the
Copy in the Possession of Mr.
John Mason Little of Boston.
(Concluded from The Journal of
American History, Volume XI,
Number 3) ." 217
AMERICAN TROOPS IN
ITALY DURING THE
WORLD WAR, THE FIRST.
Reproduced through the Cour-
tesy of Mr. Agostino de Biasi,
Editor of "II Carroccio," the
Italian Review. Illustration... 214
ANCIENT ARENA AT POLA,
THE. Reproduced through the
Courtesy of Mr. Agostino de
Biasi, Editor of "II Carroccio,"
the Italian Review. Illustration. 215
[413]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
ANOTHER LETTER FROM
CAPTAIN LITTLE TO HIS
WIFE, WRITTEN AT LIS-
BON. Copies from the Original
in the Possession of Mr. Luther
Little and Miss Joanna Little of
Boston 251
ARISTIDE SARTORIO, THE
PAINTER OF ITALY AT
WAR. By Ettore Cadorin. In
This Italy Number of The Jour-
nal of American History are Re-
produced Six of the Superb War
Scenes by This Splendid Artist
and Valiant Soldier 153
ARMANDO DIAZ, COMMAND-
ER-IN-CHIEF OF THE
ARMIES OF ITALY. Illustra-
tion 18
ARMS, ROYAL, OF ITALY.
Engraving in Colors from a
Painting Front Cover, No. 1
ARMS OF PUTNAM FAMILY.
Engraving in Colors from a
Painting Front Cover, No. 2
ARRIVAL OF HIS MAJESTY,
THE KING OF ITALY, AT
TRIESTE, NOVEMBER 10,
1918. Illustration 116
ARTICLES OF INCORPORA-
TION OF THE NATIONAL
HISTORICAL SOCIETY....
11, 171, 283
AUSTRIA, THE OVERTHROW
OF. By Captain Allesandro Sa-
pelli, Former Governor of Bena-
dir, one of Italy's Colonies in
Africa 47
BARRACKS AT BONETI ON
THE CARSO. From a Paint-
ing by Sartorio 59
BUILDINGS IN TWO DAL-
MATIAN CITIES, SEBEN-
ICO AND TRAU. 1. The
Cathedral at Sebencio. 2. The
Cathedral at Trau. 3. Carving
on Sebenico Cathedral. 4. En-
trance to the Municipal Build-
ing, Trau. 5. The Cathedral
Door, Sebenico. Illustration . . . 392
BUNKER HILL, CELEBRA-
TION, IN 1825, OF THE
FIFTIETH ANNIVERSARY
OF THE BATTLE OF. Nar-
rated in an Old-Time Newspaper
and Preserved in an Ancient
Scrap-Book. Contributed by
Charles Nevers Holmes 406
CAPODISTRIA, THE TOWN
HALL OF. Illustration 113
CAPTAIN LUTHER LITTLE.
Reproduced from the Painting in
Oils Owned by His Grandchil-
dren, Mr. Luther Little and Miss
Joanna Little of Boston 233
CAPTAIN LUTHER LITTLE'S
DESK IN HIS OLD HOME
AT MARSHFIELD, MASSA-
CHUSETTS. Illustration 235
CARSO, BARRACKS AT
BONETI ON THE. From a
Painting by Sartorio 59
CARSO, DUGOUTS OF THE.
From a Painting by Sartorio. . 57
CASTLE OF BUON CON-
SIGLIO, TRENTO. Illustra-
tion 400
CASTLE GARDEN, NEW
YORK, OLD. Poem by Charles
Nevers Holmes 384
CATHEDRAL OF TRENTO,
THE. During the War the
Austrians Imprisoned Bishop
[414]
SYLLABUS AND INDEX
Endrici of Trento for his
Patriotism. He Has Been Com-
pared, " for Nobility and Lofti-
ness of Character," to the Valiant
Christian Hero, Cardinal Mercier.
Illustration 400
CAVOUR AND THE SLAVS.
By Senator Francesco Ruf fini, .
Minister of Education in the
Italian Cabinet That Declared
War ; Rector of the University
of Turin ; a Foremost Italian Au-
thority on International Sub-
jects 375
COASTS OF THE ADRIATIC
SEA. Reproduced through the
Courtesy of Mr. Agostino de
Biasi, Editor of "II Carroccio,"
the Italian Review. Illustration. 216
DALMATIA. By Doctor Roberto
Ghiglianovitch, Member of the
Dalmatian Diet 122
DALMATIA, STRUCTURES
IN. 1. Courtyard of the Gov-
ernment Palace at Ragusa.
2. The Golden Gate, Spalato.
3. The Cathedral Pulpit, Spal-
ato. 4. The Cathedral at Cattara.
Illustration 368
DALMATIA, ZARA, RE-
DEEMED CITY OF. 1. In-
terior of Zara Cathedral. 2. The
Cathedral. 3. A Venetian Castle
at Arbe, near Zara. 4. The
Church of Saint Grisogono.
5. The Gate of the City.
6. Courtyard of a Residence.
Illustration 388
DALMATIAN CITIES, SEBEN-
ICO AND TRAU, BUILD-
INGS IN. 1. The Cathedral at
Sebenico. 2. The Cathedral at
Trau. 3. Carving on Sebenico
Cathedral. 4. Entrance to the
Municipal Building, Trau. 5.
The Cathedral Door, Sebenico.
Illustration 392
D'ANNUNZIO'S SQUADRON
OVER VIENNA. By Lieu-
tenant Stefano d' Amico, Mem-
ber of the Italian Military Mis-
sion for Aeronautics to the
United States 129
DANTE ALIGHIERI. Trento's
Monument to Italy's Great Poet,
the Forerunner of Milton, Who,
Like Milton, Used His God-
Given Genius to Lift Men's
Minds to God and His Dealings
with Men. Illustration 255
DANTE ALIGHERI SQUARE
IN TRENTO. Showing the
Statue of Italy's World-Famous
poet. Illustration 385
DISTANT VIEW OF TRIESTE
FROM HILL "121 BIS." From
a Painting by Sartorio 58
DUGOUTS ON THE CARSO.
Frm a Painting by Sartorio 57
FAC-SIMILE OF A DANISH
DOCUMENT IN CONNEC-
TION WITH CAPTAIN
LITTLE'S RUSSIAN AND
SCANDINAVIAN TRADING
EXPEDITION, 1792 236
FAC-SIMILE OF A RECORD
BY CAPTAIN LUTHER
LITTLE OF HIS WOUNDS
RECEIVED IN A VICTORI-
OUS ENGAGEMENT WITH
A BRITISH SHIP DURING
THE REVOLUTIONARY
WAR. Reproduced from the
Original in the Possession of Mr.
Luther Little and Miss Joanna
Little of Boston. . . 252
[415]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
FIGHTING STRENGTH OF
THE ITALIAN SOLDIER,
THE. Valor and Powers of En-
durance Unsurpassed by Caesar's
Legions. By the Honorable
Salvatore A. Cotillo, New York
State Senator 41
FIRST AMERICAN TROOPS
IN ITALY DURING THE
WORLD WAR, THE. Repro-
duced through the Courtesy of
Mr. Agostino de Biasi, Editor
of "II Carroccio," the Italian Re-
view. Illustrated 214
FIUME. Illustration 115
FIUME. By Doctor Gino Antoni,
Vice-Mayor of Fiume and Mem-
ber of the National Council of
the City 71
FIUME. Reproduced through the
Courtesy of Mr. Agostino de
Biasi, Editor of "II Carroccio,"
the Italian Review. Illustration. 215
FLEET SIGANLS OF COM-
MANDER SALTONSTALL
FOR THE PENOBSCOT EX-
PEDITION, 1779, AS DELIV-
ERED TO CAPTAIN
LUTHER LITTLE. Repro-
duced from the Original in the
Possession of Mr. Luther Little
and Miss Johanna Little of Bos-
ton 244
FLOTILLA COMMANDED BY
ADMIRAL MIRABELLO AP-
PROACHING LISSA, THE.
Illustration 115
FOREWORD BY THE EDI-
TOR-IN-CHIEF 21
FRENCH AND INDIAN WAR,
AMERICAN ARMY CHAP-
LAIN OF THE. Life and Let-
ters of the Reverend Benjamin
A. Pomeroy, D. D., Colonial
Preacher and Patriot. By
Colonel Albert A. Pomeroy,
Treasurer of the Ohio Soldiers'
and Sailors' Home Hospital ; Au-
thor of the Pomeroy Genealogy;
Secretary and Historian of the
Pomeroy Family Association ;
and Original Founder of The
National Historical Society 413
FRIENDS OF ITALY. Members
of The National Historical So-
ciety and Others Who Have
Generously Contributed toward
Special Distribution of the Italy
Number of The Journal of
American History 1 55
FRONT DOOR-WAY OF THE
OLD LITTLE HOUSE, THE. ^
Illustration 235
GABRIELE D'ANNUNZIO'S
FLIGHT OVER VIENNA.
The Squadron's Shower of Leaf-
lets. Illustration 134
GREAT ITALIANS OF TO-
DAY. King Victor Emanuel III.
Queen Elena, in the Uniform of
a Red Cross Nurse. General
Armando Diaz. Admiral Um-
berto Cagni, Governor of Fiume.
General Petitti di Roretto, Gov-
ernor of Trieste. Illustration . . . 396
HER EXCELLENCY, COUN-
TESS DOLORES MACCHI DI
CELLERE, WIFE OF THE
ITALIAN AMBASSADOR TO
THE UNITED STATES.
From a Photograph by Edmons-
ton, Washington, D. C 39
HER MAJESTY, THE QUEEN
OF ITALY. Portrait 20
HER MAJESTY, THE QUEEN
OF ITALY, IN THE GARB
[416]
SYLLABUS AND INDEX
OF A RED CROSS NURSE.
Illustration 393
H I S EXCELLENCY, COUNT
VINCENZO MACCHI DI
CELLERE, ITALIAN AM-
BASSADOR TO THE
UNITED STATES. From a
Photograph by Edmonston,
Washington, D. C 38
HOW THE MOUNTAIN OF
RHEIMS WAS SAVED. By
Luigi Barzini, War Correspond-
ent of "II Corriere della Sera" of
Milan 182
I N T H E TRENTINO VAL-
LARSA VALLEY. Illustration 296
IN VENETIA END OF THE
BRENTA VALLEY. Illustra-
tion 136
INFANTRY ATTACK FROM
THE TRENCHES AT SANTA
CATERINA, AN. From a
Painting by Sartorio 37
IS THE NEW LEAGUE OF
NATIONS AN INSTRU-
MENT OF TYRANNY FOR
THE REPRESSION OF HU-
MAN LIBERTY? By Frank
Allaben, President of The Na-
tional Historical Society 351
ITALIAN AMBASSADOR TO
THE UNITED STATES, HIS
EXCELLENCY, COUNT
VINCENZO MACCHI DI
CELLERE. From a Photo-
graph by Edmonston, Washing-
ton, D. C 38
ITALIAN AMBASSADOR TO
THE UNITED STATES, HER
EXCELLENCY, COUNTESS
DOLORES MACCHI DI CEL-
LERE, WIFE OF THE. From
a Photograph by Edmonston,
Washington, D. C 39
ITALIAN "ARDITTI" OPER-
ATING A MACHINE GUN.
Illustration 114
ITALIAN FRONT, ONE OF
THE MOST BITTERLY
CONTESTED SECTORS OF
THE. On the "Grappa." Illus-
tration 114
ITALIAN FRONT, SCENES AT
THE. Illustration 364
ITALIAN NAVY, THE AC-
TIVE SILENCE OF THE. By
Rear-Admiral Count Massimi-
liano Lovatelli, Naval Attache to
the Royal Italian Embassy at
Washington 35
ITALIAN SAILORS LANDING
AT LISSA, NOVEMBER 4,
1918. Illustration 79
ITALIAN SAILORS, PEOPLE
OF LISSA WELCOMING
FROM THE PIER THE AR-
RIVAL OF THE. November
4, 1918. Illustration 78
ITALIAN SOLDIER, THE
FIGHTING STRENGTH OF
THE. Valor and Powers of En-
durance Unsurpassed by Cae-
sar's Legions. By the Honorable
Salvatore A. Cotillo, New York
State Senator 41
ITALIAN SOLDIER I N
FRANCE, FIGHTING FOR
THE DEFENCE OF
RHEIMS, AN. Illustration.... 178
ITALIAN SOLDIERS BEFORE
THE CATHEDRAL O F
RHEIMS. Illustration 180
ITALIAN SOLDIERS IN THE
DOLOMITE ALPS. Repro-
duced through the Courtesy of
[417]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
Mr. Agostino de Biasi, Editor of
"II Carroccio," the Italian Re-
view. Illustration 213
ITALIAN TROOPS I N
FRANCE, PROVISIONING
THE. Illustration 179
ITALIAN WAR LOAN
POSTER, AN. From a Draw-
ing by M. Borgini 77
ITALIAN WOMEN DIGGING
SECOND LINE TRENCHES,
WHILE THE MEN WERE
FIGHTING IN THE FIRST
LINE. Illustration 60
ITALIAN WOMEN ERECTING
BARBED-WIRE ENTAN-
GLEMENTS. Illustration .... 60
ITALIAN WOMEN, THE WAR
SERVICES OF THE. By Amy
A. Bernardy, Litt. D., Universi-
ties of Rome and Florence 61
ITALIANS OF TO-DAY,
GREAT. King Victor Emanuel
III. Queen Elena, in the Uni-
form of a Red Cross Nurse.
General Armando Diaz. Ad-
miral Umberto Cagni, Governor
of Fiume. General Petitti di
Roretto, Governor of Trieste.
Illustration 396
ITALIANS IN THE UNITED
STATES. By George Creel,
Formerly Chairman of the Com-
mittee on Public Information. . . . 374
ITALY, ARMANDO DIAZ,
COMMANDER-IN -CHIEF
OF THE ARMIES OF. Illus-
tration 18
ITALY, THE FIRST AMERI-
CAN TROOPS IN DURING
THE WORLD WAR. Repro-
duced through the Courtesy of
Mr. Agostino de Biasi, Editor of
"II Carroccio," the Italian Re-
view. Illustration 214
ITALY, FORMER PREMIER
AND FOREIGN MINISTER
OF. ORLANDO AND SON-
NINO. Illustration 397
ITALY, FRIENDS OF. Mem-
bers of The National Historical
Society and Others Who Have
Generously Contributed toward
Special Distribution of the Italy
Number of The Journal of
American History 155
ITALY, THE KING OF. His ar-
rival at Trieste. Illustration .... 116
ITALY, HER MAJESTY,
QUEEN OF. Portrait 20
ITALY, HER MAJESTY, THE
QUEEN OF, IN THE GARB
OF A RED CROSS NURSE.
Illustration 393
ITALY, THE PURITY OF
PURPOSE OF. By His Excel-
lency, Count Macchi di Cellere,
Italian Ambassador to the United
States 26
ITALY REVEALED. By Frank
Allaben 81
ITALY, ROYAL ARMS OF.
Engraving in Colors from a
Painting Front Cover, No. 1
ITALY, VICTOR EMANUEL
III, KING OF. From a Photo-
graph by the International Film
Service 17
ITALY, VICTOR EMANUEL
III, KING OF. From a Photo-
graph Donated by the King to the
Editor of "II Carroccio," the
Italian Review, Mr. Agostino de
Biasi, and by the Latter's Cour-
tesy Reproduced in The Journal
of American History 177
[418]
SYLLABUS AND INDEX
ITALY, MY VISIT WITH THE
QUEEN OF. By Mary Hatch
Willard, Founder of the National
Surgical Dressings Committee,
the French Comfort Packets
Committee, and America's Allies
Co-operative Committee 137
ITALY, VITTORIO EMAN-
UELE ORLANDO, PREMIER
OF. Illustration 19
ITALY, VITTORIO EMAN-
UELE ORLANDO, PREMIER
OF. Reproduced through the
Courtesy of Mr. Agostino de
Biasi, Editor of "II Carroccio,"
the Italian Review. Illustration. 214
ITALY, WAR WORK OF THE
WOMEN OF. Illustration .... 289
ITALY'S ARMY IN THE
WORLD WAR. A Short State-
ment on an Immense Work. By
Major-General Emilio Gugliel-
motti, Military Attache to the
Royal Italian Embassy at Wash-
ington 33
ITALY'S FRIENDSHIP, LIN
COLN'S RECOGNITION OF.
From a letter Written on July
23, 1864, by President Lincoln to
Commander Bertinatti, Italian
Envoy Extraordinary 112
ITALY'S GREAT WORK IN
ALBANIA. By Brigadier-Gen-
eral George P. Scriven, U. S. A.. 117
ITALY'S SOLDIER-POET. By
Luigi Siciliani 380
ITALY'S WAR-PLANES. By
Captain Giusseppe Bevione,
Member of the Italian Parlia-
ment ; Chief of the Italian Mili-
tary Mission for Aeronautics ... 147
LATTER PART OF COM-
MANDER SALTONSTALL'S
FLEET SIGNALS, WITH
FAC-SIMILE OF ADDRESS
TO CAPTAIN LITTLE, ON
BOARD THE "PIDGEON,"
THE 245
LEAGUE OF NATIONS. IS
THE NEW LEAGUE OF NA-
TIONS AN INSTRUMENT
OF TYRANNY FOR THE
REPRESSION OF HUMAN
LIBERTY? By Frank Allaben,
President of The National His-
torical Society 351
LETTER FROM CAPTAIN
LITTLE AT BOSTON TO
HIS WIFE, WRITTEN BE-
FORE STARTING FOR
PORTUGAL AND RUSSIA.
Copied from the Original in the
Possession of Mr. Luther Little
and Miss Joanna Little of Bos-
ton 249
LETTER WRITTEN AT BOS-
TON BY CAPTAIN LUTHER
LITTLE TO HIS WIFE, ON
THE EVE OF A VOYAGE TO
THE WEST INDIES. Copied
from the Original in the Posses-
sion of Mr. Luther Little and
Miss Joanna Little of Boston. . . 248
LETTER FROM CAPTAIN
LITTLE TO HIS WIFE,
WRITTEN AT LISBON,
PORTUGAL, ON THE WAY
TO RUSSIA. Copied from the
Original in the Possession of Mr.
Luther Little and Miss Joanna
Little of Boston 250
LETTER WRITTEN AT LIS-
BON BY CAPTAIN LUTHER
LITTLE TO HIS FATHER,
LEMUEL LITTLE, AT
MARSHFIELD, MASSA-
[419]
CHUSETTS. Copied from the
Original in the Possession of Mr.
Luther Little and Miss Joanna
Little of Boston 246
LIME FURNACE AT THE
MOUTH OF THE TIMAVO
RIVER. From a Painting by
Sartorio 80
LINCOLN'S RECOGNITION
OF ITALY'S FRIENDSHIP
AND HIS PRAYER FOR
THE FULFILMENT O F
ITALY'S ASPIRATIONS.
From a Letter, Written on July
23, 1864, by President Lincoln to
Commander Bertinatti, Italian
Envoy Extraordinary 112
LITTLE, CAPTAIN LUTHER.
AN AMERICAN SEA CAP-
TAIN IN THE REVOLU-
TION. The Personal Narrative
of Captain Luther Little, before,
during, and after the Revolution-
ary War Transcribed from the
Copy in the Possession of Mr.
John Mason Little of Boston.
(Concluded front The Journal of
American History, Volume XI,
NumberZ.) 217
LITTLE, CAPTAIN LUTHER.
DESK IN HIS OLD HOME
AT MARSHFIELD, MASSA-
CHUSETTS. Illustration 235
LITTLE, CAPTAIN LUTHER.
Fac-simile of a Danish Document
in Connection with Captain Lit-
tle's Russian and Scandinavian
Trading Exposition, 1792 236
LITTLE, CAPTAIN LUTHER.
Fac-simile of a Record by Cap-
tain Luther Little of His
Wounds Received in a Victori-
ous Engagement with a British
Ship During the Revolutionary
War. Reproduced from the
Original in the Possession of Mr.
Luther Little and Miss Joanna
Little of Boston 252
LITTLE, CAPTAIN LUTHER.
Fleet Signals of Commander Sal-
tonstall for the Penobscot Ex-
pedition, 1779, as Delivered to
Captain Luther Little. Repro-
duced from the Original in the
Possession of Mr. Luther Little
and Miss Joanna Little of Bos-
ton 244
LITTLE, CAPTAIN LUTHER.
The Front Door- Way of the Old
Little House. Illustration. .... 235
LITTLE, CAPTAIN LUTHER.
The Latter Part of Commander
Saltonstall's Fleet Signals, with
Fac-simile of Address to Captain
Little, on Board the "Pidgeon.". 245
LITTLE, CAPTAIN LUTHER.
Letter from Captain Little at
Boston to His Wife, Written Be-
fore Starting for Portugal and
Russia. Copied from the Orig-
inal in the Possession of Mr.
Luther Little and Miss Joanna
Little of Boston 249
LITTLE, CAPTAIN LUTHER.
Letter from Captain Little to His
Wife, Written at Lisbon, Portu-
gal, on the Way to Russia.
Copied from the Original in the
Possession of Mr. Luther Little
and Miss Joanna Little of Boston 250
LITTLE, CAPTAIN LUTHER.
Letter Written at Boston by Cap-
tain Luther Little to His Wife,
on the Eve of a Voyage to the
West Indies. Copied from the
Original in the Possession of Mr.
[420]
SYLLABUS AND INDEX
Luther Little and Miss Joanna
Little of Boston 248
LITTLE, CAPTAIN LUTHER.
Letter Written at Lisbon by Cap-
tain Luther Little to His Father,
Lemuel Little, at Marshfield,
Massachusetts. Copied from the
Original in the Possession of Mr.
Luther Little and Miss Joanna
Little of Boston 246
LITTLE, CAPTAIN LUTHER.
Part of the Accompanying Dan-
ish Document in Connection with
Captain Little's Russian and
Scandinavian Trading Exposi-
tion, 1792. Fac-simile 241
LITTLE, CAPTAIN LUTHER.
Rear View of Captain Little's
House. Illustration 234
LITTLE, CAPTAIN LUTHER.
Reproduced from the Painting
in Oils Owned by His Grandchil-
dren, Mr. Luther Little and Miss
Joanna Little of Boston 233
MALPAS, THE OLD CHURCH
IN. Sketch of the Old-World
Parish Church in Which Wor-
shipped the Ancestors of the
American Stockton Family. By
H. H. Stockton 401
MY VISIT WITH THE QUEEN
OF ITALY. By Mary Hatch
Willard, Founder of the National
Surgical Dressings Committee,
the French Comfort Packets
Committe, and America's Allies
Co-operative Committee 137
NATIONAL HISTORICAL SO-
CIETY, THE. ARTICLES
OF INCORPORATION 11
171, 283
NATIONAL HISTORICAL SO-
CIETY, THE. OFFICIAL
ORGANIZATION .... 5, 165, 277
NATIONAL HISTORICAL SO-
CIETY, THE. OFFICIAL
SEAL. Back Cover, Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4
NAVY GUNS AT PUNTA
SDOBBA. From a Painting by
Sartorio 40
OLD CASTLE GARDEN, NEW
YORK. Poem by Charles
Nevers Holmes 384
OLD CHURCH IN MALPAS,
THE. Sketch of the Old-World
Parish Church in Which Wor-
shipped the Ancestors of the
American Stockton Family. By
H. H. Stockton 401
OLD WELL IN THE KITCHEN
OF CAPTAIN LUTHER LIT-
TLE'S HOUSE, SEA VIEW,
MARSHFIELD, MAS-
SACHUSETTS, THE. Illus- ^
tration 234
ON THE "GRAPPA." One of
the Most Bitterly Contested Sec-
tors of the Italian Front. Illus-
tration 114
ORLANDO AND SONNINO
FORMER PREMIER AND
FOREIGN MINISTER OF
ITALY. Illustration 397
ORLANDO, VITTORIO
EMANUELE, PREMIER OF
ITALY. Reproduced through
the Courtesy of Mr. Agostino de
Biasi, Editor of "II Carroccio,"
the Italian Review. Illustration. 214
OUR SOLDIERS AND THE
ROCKY MOUNTAIN CLUB.
By Major-General David Carey
Shanks. Commander of the Port
of Embarkation 335
[421]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
OVERTHROW OF AUSTRIA,
THE. By Captain Alessandro
Sapelli, Former Governor of
Benadir, One of Italy's Colonies
in Africa 47
PART OF THE ACCOMPANY-
ING DANISH DOCUMENT
IN CONNECTION WITH
CAPTAIN LITTLE'S RUS-
SIAN AND SCANDINAVIAN
TRADING EXPEDITION,
1792. Fac-simile 241
PATRIOTISM THE AFFIRMA-
TION OF GOD. By His Emi-
nence, Desire Joseph Francois,
Cardinal Mercier, Archbishop of
Malines 181
PEAKS OF THE ADAMELLO
GROUP IN THE ALPS.
Scene of Gallant Fighting Under
Difficulties by the Alpini Troops.
Illustration 135
PEOPLE OF LISSA WELCOM-
ING FROM THE PIER THE
ARRIVAL OF THE ITALIAN
SAILORS, NOVEMBER 4,
1918, THE. Illustration 78
PERSONAL MEMORIES OF
THEODORE ROOSEVELT.
By His Excellency, Jean J. Jus-
serand, Ambassador from France
to the United States 320
PERSONALITY AND THE
PHILOSOPHY OF THEO-
DORE ROOSEVELT, THE.
By the Honorable Job Elmer
Hedges, LL. D 326
PILOTS OF THE SQUADRON
"SERENISSIMA,"' WITH
THEIR CAPTAIN, D'AN-
NUNZIO, IN THE CENTRE,
THE. Illustration 133
POLA, THE ANCIENT ARENA
AT. Reproduced through the
Courtesy of Mr. Agostino de
Biasi, Editor of "II Carroccio,"
the Italian Review. Illustration. 215
POLA, IN ISTRIA. 1. Arch Built
by the Romans. 2. Temple of
Augustus. 3. The Ancient Ro-
man Amphitheatre. Illustration. 361
PROVISIONING THE ITAL-
IAN TROOPS IN FRANCE.
Illustration 179
PURITY OF PURPOSE OF
ITALY, THE. By His Excel-
lency, Count Macchi di Cellere,
Italian Ambassador to the United
States 26
PUTNAM AND CLEAVELAND
ANCESTRY, A STUDY IN.
By Georgia Cooper Washburn. . 188
PUTNAM COAT-OF-ARMS.
Engraving in Colors from a
Painting Front Cover, No. 2
REAR VIEW OF CAPTAIN
LITTLE'S HOUSE. Illustra-
tion 234
RECOLLECTIONS OF
NINETY-FIVE YEARS IN
CONNECTICUT AND THE
ANTHRACITE REGIONS OF
PENNSYLVANIA. By Wil-
liam Henry Richmond. (Con-
cluded from The Journal of
American History, Volume XI,
Number 3.) .....' 257
REDEEMED CITY OF
TRENTO.THE. Illustration.. 254
RHEIMS, AN ITALIAN SOL-
DIER IN FRANCE FIGHT-
ING FOR THE DEFENCE
OF. Illustration . .178
[422]
SYLLABUS AND INDEX
RHEIMS, ITALIAN SOLDIERS
BEFORE THE CATHEDRAL
OF. Illustration 180
ROCKY MOUNTAIN CLUB,
OUR SOLDIERS AND THE.
By Major-General David Carey
Shanks. Commander of the Port
of Embarkation 335
ROOSEVELT ON HORSE-
BACK. Copyright by G. B. M.
Clinedenst. .Front Cover, Nos. 3 and 4
ROOSEVELT AND THE PUB-
LIC CONSCIENCE. By Her-
bert Hoover 309
ROOSEVELT AND THE
SQUARE DEAL. By Colonel
William Boyce Thompson, Presi-
dent of the Roosevelt Memorial
Associaiion, Vice-President of
the Rocky Mountain Club 304
ROOSEVELT, TRIBUTES TO.
Messages Received by the Rocky
Mountain Club at Its First
Roosevelt Day Dinner 341
ROOSEVELT, THEODORE,
By the Honorable Elihu Root . . . 299
ROOSEVELT, THEODORE,
"FIRST AMERICAN OF OUR
DAY." By John* Hays Ham-
mond, LL. D., President of the
National League of Republican
Clubs and of the Rocky Moun-
tain Club 312
ROOSEVELT. THEODORE.
THE MEMORIAL NUMBER
OF THE JOURNAL OF
AMERICAN HISTORY. By
the Editor-in-Chief 297
ROOSEVELT, THEODORE.
THE PERSONALITY AND
THE PHILOSOPHY OF. By
the Honorable Job Elmer
Hedges, LL. D 326
ROOSEVELT'S AMERICAN-
ISM. By the Honorable Alton
B.Parker 314
REVOLUTION, AN AMERI-
CAN SEA CAPTAIN IN THE.
The Personal Narrative of Cap-
tain Luther Little, before, dur-
ing, and after the Revolutionary
War Transcribed from the
Copy in the Possession of Mr.
John Mason Little of Boston.
(Concluded from The Journal of
American History, Volume XI,
Number 3.) 217
ROYAL ARMS OF ITALY. En-
graving in Colors from a Paint-
ing Front Cover, No. 1
SARTORIO, ARISTIDE, THE
PAINTER OF ITALY AT
WAR. By Ettore Cadorin. In
This Italy Number of The Jour-
nal of American History Are Re-
produced Six of the Superb War
Scenes by This Splendid Artist
and Valiant Soldier 153
SCENES AT THE ITALIAN
Front. Illustration 364
SCENES IN TRENTO AND
TRIESTE. 1. The Castle of
Buon Consiglio. 2. The Cathe-
dral. 3. The Dante Monument.
4. View from the Grand Canal.
Trieste. 5. Panorama of Trento.
Illustration 365
SLAVS, CAVOUR AND THE.
By Senator Francesco Ruffini.
Minister of Education in the
Italian Cabinet That Declared
War; Rector of the University
of Turin ; a Foremost Italian Au-
thority on International Subjects. 375
SONNINO AND ORLANDO,
FORMER FOREIGN MINIS-
[423]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
TER AND PREMIER OF
ITALY. Illustration 397
SQUADRON "SERENISSIMA"
PASSING OVER NOTABLE
BUILDINGS OF VIENNA,
THE. Illustration 133
STOCKTON FAMILY,
SKETCH OF THE OLD-
WORLD PARISH CHURCH
IN WHICH WORSHIPPED
THE ANCESTORS OF THE
AMERICAN. The Old Church
inMalpas. By H. H. Stockton. . 401
STRUCTURES IN DALMATIA.
1. Courtyard of the Government
Palace at Ragusa. 2. The Golden
Gate, Spalato. 3. The Cathedral
pulpit, Spalato. 4. The Cathedral
at Cattara. Illustration 368
STUDY IN PUTNAM AND
CLEAVELAND ANCESTRY,
A. By Georgia Cooper Wash-
burn 188
THEODORE ROOSEVELT,
"FIRST AMERICAN OF OUR
DAY." By John Hays Ham-
mond, LL. D., President of the
National League of Republican
Clubs and of the Rocky Moun-
tain Club 312
THREE TRENTINO PAT-
RIOTS MURDERED BY THE
AUSTRIANS. Illustration ... 397
TOWN HALL OF CAPODIS-
TRIA, THE. Illustration 113
TRIESTE. By Doctor Giorgio
Pitacco, Municipal Councillor of
Trieste; Former Deputy to the
Austrian Parliament 74
TRIESTE. 1. The Harbor. 2.
Arch of Riccardo. 3. Door of
the Campanile. 4. Remains of
Roman Structure in the Cam-
panile, or Bell-Tower of the
Cathedral. Illustration 389
TRIESTE. Reproduced through
the Courtesy of Mr. Agostino de
Biasi, Editor of "II Carroccio,"
the Italian Review. Illustration. 256
TRIESTE, DISTANT VIEW
OF. From a Painting by Sar-
torio 58
TRIESTE AND TRENTO,
SCENES IN. 1. The Castle of
Buon Consiglio. 2. The Cathe-
dral. 3. The Dante Monument.
4. View from the Grand Canal,
Trieste. 5. Panorama of Trento.
Illustration 365
TRIESTE, WELCOMING THE
KING OF ITALY ON HIS
ARRIVAL AT. Illustration... 116
TRENTINO, IN THE. Vallarsa
Valley. Illustration 296
TRENTINO PATRIOTS MUR-
DERED BY THE AUS-
TRIANS, THREE. Illustra-
tion 393
TRENTO. Reproduced through
the Courtesy of Mr. Agostino de
Biasi, Editor of "II Carroccio,"
the Italian Review. Illustration . 253
TRENTO, THE CATHEDRAL
OF. During the War the Aus-
trians Imprisoned Bishop Endrici
of Trento for His Patriotism.
He Has Been Compared, "for
Nobility and Loftiness of Char-
acter," to the Valiant Christian
Hero, Cardinal Mercier. Illus-
tration 400
TRENTO, CASTLE OF BUON
CONSIGLIO. Illustration .... 400
TRENTO, DANTE ALIGHIERI
SQUARE IN. Showing the
[424]
SYLLABUS AND INDEX
Statue of Italy's World-Famous
Poet. Illustration 385
TRENTO, THE REDEEMED
CITY OF. Illustration 254
TRENTO AND TRIESTE,
SCENES IN. 1. The Castle of
Buon Consiglio. 2. The Cathe-
dral. 3. The Dante Monument.
4. View from the Grand Canal,
Trieste. 5. Panorama of Trento.
Illustration 365
VERDI'S FORECAST OF THE
WORLD WAR. The Great
Italian Composer, Mourning the
Hun Invasion of France in 1870,
Predicted War Between Italy
and Germany 151
VICTOR EMANUEL III. KING
OF ITALY. From a Photo-
graph by the International Film
Service 17
VICTOR EMANUEL III, KING
OF ITALY. From a Photo-
graph Donated by the King to
the Editor of "II Carroccio," the . .
Italian Review, Mr. Agostino de
Biasi, and by the Lattej's Cour-
tesy Reproduced in The Journal
of American History 177
VIENNA, D'ANNUNZIO'S
SQUADRON OVER. By Lieu-
tenant Stefano d'Amico, Member
of the Italian Military Mission
for Aeronautics to the United
States 129
VIENNA, GABRIELE D'AN-
NUNZIO'S FLIGHT OVER.
The Squadron's Shower of Leaf-
lets. Illustration 134
VIENNA, THE SQUADRON
"SERENISSIMA" PASSING
OVER NOTABLE BUILD-
INGS OF. Illustration 133
VITTORIO EMANUELE OR-
LANDO, PREMIER OF
ITALY. Illustration 19
VITTORIO EMANUELE OR-
LANDO, PREMIER OF
ITALY. Reproduced through
the Courtesy of Mr. Agostino de
Biasi, Editor of "II Carroccio,"
the Italian Review. Illustration. 214
VOICE OF A SOLDIER FROM
CAPODISTRIA, THE. By
Colonel Ugo Pizzarello 52
WAR SERVICES OF ITALIAN
WOMEN, THE. By Amy A.
Bernardy, Litt. D., Universities
of Rome and Florence 61
WAR WORK OF THE WOMEN
OF ITALY. Illustration 289
WASHINGTON CROSSING
THE DELAWARE. From the
Famous Painting by Emmanuel
L e u t z in the Metropolitan
Museum of Art, New York. Il-
lustration 292, 293
WELCOMING THE KING OF
ITALY ON HIS ARRIVAL
AT TRIESTE. Illustration.... 116
WORDS FOR OUR TIME AND
ALL TIME. By Theodore
Roosevelt 339
ZARA, REDEEMED CITY OF
DALMATIA. 1. Interior of
Zara Cathedral. 2. The Cathe-
dral. 3. A Venetian Castle at
Arbe, near Zara. 4. The Church
of Saint Grisogono. 5. The Gate
of the City. 6. Courtyard of a
Residence. Illustration . . . 388
[425]
X
;i
o
^
DQ
C
(Vvii
ft.
O
** w
PUBLISHED br
THF. NATIONAL HisioRicALSociEir
HED AS SECOND CLASS MATItR. JULf 22. 1919 AT I
, ALbANf.N. Y.. UNbfcK mt , MAK^H 3 C.'^
.
.-
Journal nf Ammran
Polunu 3EJP, 1020
jpout ^timbers in Cnr
Quarter, j^ umber 1,
^rrontj Quarter, Dumber 2,
Quarter, Dumber 3, 3ulj
jfouttt) Quarter, Dumber 4, Qctober=j2obember--Demnbn
J
:
.V
n
LONDON B. P. Stevens & Brown
4 Trafalgar Square, W. C.
PARIS Brentano's
37, Avenue de I'Ope'ra
DUBLIN Combrldge and Company
18 Grafton Street
EDINBURGH ...Andrew Elliott
17 Princes Street
MADRID Liberia Intcrnaclonal de
Adrian Romo, Alcala i
ROME L. Piale
1 Piazza di Spagna
PETROGRAD Watkins and Company
Marskaia No. 36
CAIRO F. Diemer
Shepheard's Building
BOMBAY Thacker and Company Limited
Esplanade Road
TOKIO Methodist Publishing House
2 Shlchome, Glz Ginza
MEXICO CITY. . .American Book and Printing Co.
1st San Francisco No. 12
ATHENS Const. Electheroudakls
Place de la Constitution
BUENOS A YRE8. .John Grant and Son
Calle Cangallo 469
3(0wrnal of Ammcatt
1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th (ijhutrtrrs -X'wrtmt uaunttu
VOLUME XIV
NOS . 1. 2. 3 AND A
profcurrD bj> cf)r Rational historical Company in Quartrrlp Coitions,
four Boofe0 to tljr Polumc. at four Dollars Annually,
One fiDollat a Copp tor feinglr pumbrrs, tot
Natumal Sftainriral
Copyright, 1921, fry 77* National Historical Society
Publication Office: Greenfield, Indiana, John Fowler Mitchell, Jr., Manager
Editorial Offices: 37 West Thirty-ninth Street, New York
Cmutibr Officers of
l?tstoriral
/Rational
FRANK ALLABEN, President
MABEL T. R. WASHBUUN, Secretary
DUDLEY BUTLER, Treasurer
Cfcitorial directors ot tljr journal
of amrriran l?istorp
FRANK ALLABEN, Editor-in-Chief
MABEL T. R. WASHBURN, Genealogical Editor
JOHN FOWLER MITCHELL, JR., Associate Editor
(3cano Council ot
PHILANDER KEEP ROOTS
George Washington Memorial As-
sociation
MRS. Louis FLICKINGER
State Recording Secretary Daughters
of the American Revolution
MRS. THOMAS MOSES CORY
Daughters of the American Revolution
California
ROY MALCOM, A. M., PH. D.
Professor of History, University of
Southern California
MRS. CYRUS WALKER
HONORABLE NATHAN W. BLANCHARD,
A. M., Ex-California Representative
NELSON OSGOOD RHOADES
Mayflower Society, Colonial Wars,
Sons of the Revolution
MRS. J. H. Me EL HINNEY
Daughters of the American Revolution
Colorado
MRS. JOHN LLOYD MCNEIL
Past Regent, Colorado, Daughters of
the American Revolution
Connecticut
Miss ADELINE E. ACKLEY
2Di0trict ot Columbia
MRS. HENRY F. DIMOCK
President George Washington Memo-
rial Association
CAPTAIN ALBERT HARRISON VAN
DEUSEN
Holland Society, Sons of the Ameri-
can Revolution
[5]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
LEWIS HORN FISHER, LL. M.
Secretary United States Civil Service,
Fourth District
tflori&a
MRS. CLAUDE STELLE TINGLEY, B. S.,
M. A.
SISTER ESTHER CARLOTTA, S. R.
Ex-President Florida Division United
Daughters of the Confederacy
GEORGE P. CASTLE
WILLIAM D. WESTERVELT
JUtnois
HONORABLE JOHN H. HUNGATE
President First National Bank, La
Harpe
MRS. GEORGE A. LAWRENCE
Honorary State Regent for life, Illi-
nois Daughters of the American
Revolution
MRS. HENRY CLAY PURMONT
Life-Member Society Mayflower De-
scendants in Illinois
A. G. ZIMMERMAN, M. D.
JOHN FOWLER MITCHELL
President William Mitchell Printing
Company
HONORABLE GEORGE H. COOPER
Cashier Greenfield Citizens Bank
Jo tod
SHERMAN IRA POOL
Sons of the American Revolution.
Iowa State Historical Society
EDWIN WELCH BURCH
First President Iowa Baptist Brother-
hood
luntucftp
ALEXANDER KEITH,
B. A.
CHARLES
OXON.
History and Civics, East Kentucky
Normal School
MRS. WILLIAM H. THOMPSON
Vice-President General, National So-
ciety Daughters of the American
Revolution
Miss MARY NATALIE BALDY
SBaine
Miss NELLIE WOODBURY JORDAN
Instructor in History, State Normal
MRS. EDWARD EDES SHEAD
HUGH MACLELLAN SOUTHGATE, B. S.
American Institute Electrical Engi-
neers
JOHN GLENN COOK
99 assart) usttt0
ALPHONZO BENJAMIN BOWERS, C. E.
President Atlantic Harbor Railroad
Company
HENRY Louis STICK, M. D.
Superintendent Hospital Cottages for
Children, Baldwinsville
J. VAUGHAN DENNETT
New England Historical and Genea-
logical Society
MRS. Louis PRANG
President Roxburv Civic Club
[6J
GRAND COUNCIL OF THE VICE-1'RKS! 'HINTS
MRS. SARAH BOWMAN VAN NESS
Honorary Life Regent, Lexington.
Daughters of the American Revo-
lution
Miss CAROLINE BORDEN
Trustee American College, Constanti-
nople
MRS. CARL F. KAUFMANN
FRANK REED KIMBALL
Society of Colonial Wars, Sons of the
American Revolution
FREDERICK W. MAIN, M. D.
Jackson Chamber of Commerce
MRS. JAMES H. CAMPBELL
State President, United States Daugh-
ters of 1812
MRS. FORDYCE HUNTINGTON ROGERS
Ex-Dean Women, Olivet College
MRS. FREDERICK BECKWITH STEVENS
MRS. MARY ELIZABETH BUCKNUM
Minneapolis Chapter, Daughters of
the American Revolution
Miss LUELLA AGNES OWEN
Fellow American Association for the
Advancement of Science and Amer-
ican Geographical Society
T. J. FITZPATRICK, M. S.
Fellow American Association for the
Advancement of Science
MRS. ERASTUS GAYLORD PUTNAM
Honorary Vice-President General
National Society Daughters of the
American Revolution
ELEANOR HAINES, M. D.
Life-Member, New Jersey Historical
Society
MRS. JOSEPH DORSETT BEDLE
Past President New Jersey Society
of Colonial Dames
MRS. ORVILLE T. WARING
New Jersey Colonial Dames, New
Jersey Historical Society
MRS. RUTH E. FAIRCHILD
Life-Member Daughters of the Amer-
ican Revolution, Member New Jer-
sey Colonial Dames, Life- Member
New Jersey Historical Society
MRS. JAMES E. POPE
HON. L. BRADFORD PRINCE, LL. D.
Ex-Governor, President Historical
Society of New Mexico
jftrto ifotft
REVEREND GEORGE CLARKE HOUGHTON,
D. D.
Society of Colonial Wars, Sons of the
Revolution
CHARLES JACKSON NORTH
Life-Member Buffalo Historical So-
ciety
HENRY E. HUNTINGTON
President Los Angeles Railway Cor-
poration, Society of Colonial Wars,
Sons of the Revolution
[7]
GRAND COUNCIL OF THE VICE-PRESIDENTS
JOSEPH A. MCALEENAN
Associate Member Explorers' Club
FRANK JOSEF Louis WOUTERS
President Oleogravure Co., Inc.
OTTO MARC EIDLITZ
Ex-Tenement House Commissioner
MRS. BENJAMIN SILLIMAN CHURCH
Incorporator and Past Vice- President
Colonial Dames, New York
MRS. FREDERICK F. THOMPSON
Vice-President George Washington
Memorial Association
MRS. HENRY FAIRFIELD OSBORN
Philanthropist, Trustee Barnard Col-
lege
MRS. JOHN CARSTENSEN
MRS. ALICE B. TWEEDY
National Society Daughters of the
American Revolution
MRS. MELVILLE AUGUSTUS JOHNSON
Director Onondaga County Historical
Association
MRS. CORNELIA E. S. HOLLEY
Chapin Association
MRS. HENRY A. STRONG
Life-Member George Washington
Memorial Association
Miss MAY OSBORNE
National Society Daughters of the
American Revolution
MRS. VIOLA A. BROMLEY
Fort Greene Chapter, Daughters of
the American Revolution
MRS. W. B. SYLVESTER
Founder and Honorary Regent, Mon-
roe Chapter, Daughters of the
American Revolution
MRS. NELLIS MARATHON RICH
National Society Founders and Pa-
triots of America
MRS. J. HULL BROWNING
MRS. WILLIAM WARD DAKE
Miss MARGARET A. JACKSON
G. ALFRED LAWRENCE, M. D., PH. D.
New York Academy of Medicine,
Sons of the American Revolution
Miss LUCILE THORNTON
CHARLES FREDERICK QUINCY
Chairman, Executive Committee,
American Forestry Association
>nKota
C. HERSCHEL KOYL, PH. D.
Fellow Johns Hopkins University
HONORABLE B. F. WIRT
President Equity Savings and Loan
Company
S. O. RICHARDSON, JR.
Vice-President Libbey Glass Company
MRS. OBED J. WILSON
Life-Member George Washington
Memorial Association
MRS. HOWARD JONES
Life-Member Ohio Archaeological and
Historical Society
MRS. JOHN GATES
Life-Member George Washington
Memorial Association
MRS. JOHN SANBORN CONNER
Life-Member George Washington
Memorial Association
Miss MARIE A. HIBBARD
Daughters of the American Revolu-
tion, Toledo Art Museum Associa-
tion
[8]
GRAND COUNCIL OF THE VICE-PRESIDENTS
MRS. GUSSIE DEBENATH OGDEN
Life-Member Mercantile Library, Cin-
cinnati
FREDERICK J. TRUMPOUR
W. B. CARPENTER, M. D.,
Sons of the American Revolution,
Vice- President Columbus Mutual
Life Insurance Company
B. F. STRECKER
President The Citizens National Bank
of Marietta
Oregon
DAVID N. MOSESSOHN
Lawyer, Publisher and Editor The
Oregon Country
prnnGplbania
FRANCIS AUGUSTUS LOVELAND
President Chrome and Beck Tanning
Companies
PERCIVAL K. GABLE
JOSEPH J. DESMOND
President Corry Citizens' National
Bank
GEORGE T. BUSH
Life-Member Sons of the Revolution
MRS. FREDERICK PICKETT
Miss MARY MEILY
LxfjoUr Jolanb
ALFRED TUCKERMAN, PH. D.
American Association for the Ad-
vancement of Science
Pitginia
MRS. BALDWIN DAY SPILMAN
Past Vice-President General, Na-
tional Society Daughters of the
American Revolution
MRS. LEVIN THOMAS CARTWRIGHT
Virginia Historical Society, Daugh-
ters of the American Revolution,
United Daughters of the Confed-
eracy
CUrot Pirffinia
C. M. BOGER, M. D.
Ex-President International Hahne-
mann Association
MAJOR WILLIAM H. COBB
Director General. Knights of Wash-
ington
MRS. ANDREW M. JOYS
Honorary Life-President, Wisconsin
Chapter, Daughters of Founders
and Patriots of America
EDWIN MONTGOMERY BAILEY
MRS. FRANCES A. BAKER DUNNING
MRS. ALFRED B. SCOTT
Colorado
MRS. PHILLIPS M. CHASE
Society of Colonial Dames
of tljf &tate flbbtcorp Boards
Jotoa
MRS. SHERMAN IRA POOL
State Historian, Iowa, Daughters of
the American Revolution
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
a? a ry Unto MRS. FRANK FOWLER Uo\v
JOHN GLENN COOK Regent Irondequoit Chapter Daugh-
American Association for the Ad- ters of the American Revolution
vancement of Science ^ R s. GEORGE GEDNEY SANDS
MRS. GEORGE C. CLAUSEN
ARTHUR F. ESTABROOK Ohio
American Academy of Political and FRANK S ERVIS MASTEX
Social Science
CHARLES LYMAN NEWHALL m||0lJt
George Washington Memorial Asso- ,,
. MRS. CHARLES EDMUND LONGLEY
State Regent, Rhode Island, Daugh-
ters of the American Revolution
HONORABLE GEORGE D. EMERSON
Ex-Member New York State Senate
HENRY PARSONS MRS. EDWARD ROTAN
Military Order of the Loyal Legion Daughters of the American Revolution
[10]
Arttrl?0 of Jtarorporatton at
National irtHtortral
Jncoiporatco unbci tljr Hatos ot ttjr District of Columbia
at CUas&ington, on tfjr 'ct!3fnty=fe>ijtf) SDap ot flprtl, in tfjr
gear of fiDur Eoto, Nineteen DunarcD anb fifteen, "Jpot
tfie purpose ot promoting historical 1-uiotolebge ano
patriotism, and tfje peace ot Uig&teouaness among
NAME by which the Society is to be
known is "The National Historical So-
ciety."
The Society is to continue in perpe-
tuity.
The particular business and objects
of the Society will be:
(a) To discover, procure, preserve, and perpetuate
whatever relates to History, the History of the Western
Hemisphere, the History of the United States of America
and their possessions, and the History of families.
(b) To inculcate and bulwark patriotism, in no par-
tisan, sectional, nor narrowly national sense, but in recog-
nition of man's high obligation toward civic righteousness,
believing that human governments are divinely ordained
to bear the sword and exercise police duty for good against
evil, and not for evil against good, and recognizing, as be-
tween peoples and peoples, that "God has made of one
blood all nations of men."
(c) To provide a national and international patri-
otic clearing-house and historical exchange, promoting by
suitable means helpful forms of communication and co-
operation between all historical organizations, patriotic
orders, and kindred societies, local, state, national, and
international, that the usefulness of all may be increased
and their benefits extended toward education and
patriotism.
(d) To promote the work of preserving historic
landmarks and marking historic sites.
(e) To encourage the use of historical themes and
the expression of patriotism in the arts.
(/) In the furtherance of the objects and purposes
of the Society, and not as a commercial business, to acquire
The Journal of American History, and to publish the same
as the official organ of the Society, and to publish or pro-
mote the publication of whatever else may seem advisable
in furtherance of the objects of the Society.
(g) To authorize the organization of members of
the Society, resident in given localities, into associated
branch societies, or chapters of the parent Society, and to
promote by all other suitable means the purpose, objects,
and work of the Society.
The Membership body of The National Historical
Society consists of
(1) Original Founders, contributing five dollars
each to the Founders' Fund, thus enrolling as pioneer
builders of a great National Institution;
(2) Original State Advisory Board Founders, con-
tributing twenty-five dollars each to the Founders' Fund,
from whom are elected the Members of the State Advisory
Boards ;
(3) Original Life-Member Founders, contributing
one hundred dollars each to the Founders' Fund, from
whom are elected for life the members of the Grand Coun-
cil of the Vice-Presidents ;
(4) Patrons, who contribute one thousand dollars
to further the work of the Society;
(5) Annual Members, who pay two dollars, annual
dues, receiving The Journal of American History.
(6) Sustaining Members, who contribute five dol-
lars, annual dues, receiving The Journal of American
History.
(7) Sustaining Life-Members, who contribute one
hundred dollars annually.
(8) Sustaining Contributors, who contribute an-
nually any sum between five dollars and one hundred
dollars.
of
TITLE PAGE DESIGN 3
BOARD OF EDITORIAL DIRECTORS AND OFFICIAL
ORGANIZATION 5
ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF THE NATIONAL
HISTORICAL SOCIETY 1 1
AMERICAN VALOR. FRONTISPIECE ENGRAVING 17
PATRIOTISM. FRONTISPIECE ENGRAVING 20
ITALIAN MILITARY ACTION IN THE WORLD WAR.
PREPARED FOR THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY BY
COLONEL V. Di BERNEZZO, MILITARY ATTACHE OF THE
ITALIAN EMBASSY By "Italics" 21
THE FIRST REPUBLICAN-DEMOCRATIC PRESIDEN-
TIAL CAMPAIGN. AN INTERESTING ACCOUNT OF THE
FORMATION OF A NEW AND POWERFUL POLITICAL PARTY By
Charles Nevers Holmes 41
A FOUNDER-FAMILY OF PENNSYLVANIA. STUDIES IN
MEILY ANCESTRY By Mabel Thacher Rosemary Washburn,
Secretary of The National Historical Society. For Meily
Arms in Colors, See Front Cover of Magazine 49
PORTRAIT OF MARK TWAIN 72
LIEUTENANT U. S. GRANT AND LIEUTENANT ALEX-
ANDER HAYS IN 1845, WHEN THEY WERE START-
ING FOR THE MEXICAN WAR 73
PORTRAIT OF HIRAM ULYSSES, LATER KNOWN AS
ULYSSES SIMPSON GRANT 76
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
HOW GRANT AND SHERMAN SHOCKED THE DIPLO-
MATS. AMUSING EPISODES AT THE EMBASSY BALL FOR PRINCE
ARTHUR, DUKE OF CONNAUGHT, IN THE WASHINGTON OF
THE SIXTIES By Mrs. Benjamin Silliman Church, Vice-
President of The National Historical Society 77
WAR VESSELS AT ANCHOR IN THE HUDSON RIVER.
ENGRAVING 85
THE MAYFLOWER PASSING THE UNITED STATES
WARSHIPS IN THE HUDSON RIVER. ENGRAVING... 86
TABLETS THAT TALK. THE STORY OF THE FIGHTING DAYS OF
'77 AS TOLD BY THE TOMBSTONES OF OLD BENNINGTON,
VERMONT 87
BUST OF ETHAN ALLEN. ENGRAVING 93
COMMODORE OLIVER HAZZARD PERRY 96
AN AMERICAN RED CROSS OPERATOR SHOWING
MOVING PICTURES IN A SICK WARD AT THE
WALTER REED GENERAL HOSPITAL IN WASH-
INGTON 97
MONUMENT AT GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA.
ENGRAVING 100
WHAT SHALL WE DO TO PRESERVE THE OLD BURIAL
GROUNDS? A PLEA FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE ABAN-
DONED GRAVEYARDS OF OUR COUNTRY By James Woodburn
Hamilton 101
FITTING THE WATERS OF THE GREAT PLAINS FOR
INDUSTRIAL USE By C. Herschel Koyl, Ph. D., Fellow,
1881-1883, Johns Hopkins University 103
A HISTORY OF THE ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF
BANKS AND BANKING AND OF BANKS AND BANK-
ING IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK By W. Harrison
Bayles and Frank Allaben 1 10
[14]
TABLE OF CONTENTS
AMERICAN SLEDGES ON THE ICE AT CAPE GEORGE
RUSSELL. ENGRAVING 129
AMERICAN SHIP PARTING HAWSERS OFF GODSEND
LEDGE. ENGRAVING 132
AN EPISODE OF NORTH AMERICAN HISTORY. THE...
CONQUEST OF CANADA BY THE KlRKE BROTHERS, 1627-1632
By Doctor Henry J. Berkley 133
SIEUR DE LA SALLE. ENGRAVING 149
THE REGION OF THE FRENCH AND INDIAN WAR.
ENGRAVING 1 52
A COLONIAL PREACHER AND PATRIOT By Colonel
A. A. Pomeroy 161
A HISTORY OF BANKS AND BANKING. (Continued) 174
UNITED STATES STEAMSHIP, "WOLVERINE," FOR-
MERLY THE "MICHIGAN." ENGRAVING 201
DECK VIEW OF THE UNITED STATES STEAMSHIP
"WOLVERINE." ENGRAVING 204
LAFAYETTE. A POEM By Charles Nevers Holmes 205
WHOM SHOULD HISTORY RANK NEXT TO WASHING-
TON AMONG THE HEROES OF OUR WAR FOR
INDEPENDENCE B y the Reverend George Israel
Browne, M. A., Rector of St. John's Church, Lancaster,
Pennsylvania; Member of The National Historical Society. . .206
PLAN FOR THE ATTACK FOR THE SAINT-MIHIEL
SALIENT, THE FIRST GREAT EXPLOIT IN FRANCE
OF THE AMERICAN ARMY ACTING AS SUCH
UNDER ITS COMMANPER, GENERAL PERSHING.
ENGRAVING 231
THE WATERWAYS OF ILLINOIS. ENGRAVING 232
[15]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
SAINT GEORGE'S AT POPHAM. FORERUNNER OF ALL
AMERICAN FORTS By Grace Louise Robinson 233
UNITED STATES WARSHIP FIRING A SALUTE.
ENGRAVING 236
FACSIMILE OF THE ARTICLES OF CAPITULATION
SIGNED BY GENERAL BURGOYNE OF THE BRITISH
ARMY, AFTER THE BATTLE OF SARATOGA, IN
1777. ENGRAVING 237
SECOND PAGE OF ARTICLES OF CAPITULATION
SIGNED BY GENERAL BURGOYNE. ENGRAVING 240
A HISTORY OF BANKS AND BANKING. (Continued) ... .241
PORTRAIT OF EDWARD EVERETT HALE. ENGRAVING. .254
REPORT OF THE TREASURER OF THE NATIONAL HIS-
TORICAL SOCIETY 255
THIS SPIRITED
IMKCK OF STATUARY,
DESIGNED BY AUGUSTUS
LUKEMAN. SCULPTOR.
ADORNS THE MONUMENT
AT SUMMERVILLE.
MASSACHUSETTS.
ERECTED IN COMMEMORA-
TION OF THE BRAVERY
OF THE SOLDIERS IN
THE CIVIL WAR OF THE
UNITED STATES
AMERICAN VALOR
U1J
PATRIOTISM
The Motherhood and Youth of the Nation, as conceived by Evelyn Beatrice Longman, of the 'National
Academy of Design. One of the bronze doors of the United States Naval Academy, at Annapolis,
Maryland, unveiled in June, 1909.
VOLUME XIV
NINETEEN TWENTY
NUMBER 1
FIRST QUARTER
Jtaltan JKUitorg Arttnn in
BT
"ITALICUS"
Prepared for The Journal of American History by
COLONEL V. DI BERNEZZO
Military Attache of the Italian Embassy
TALICUS" is the nom-de-phime of a high military per-
sonality of Italy, whose identity must for the present
remain thus unrevealed, and who is in a position to
know intimately the plans and purposes of the Italian
Supreme Command from 1915 to 1917.
The following study, prepared from the profound
and interesting discussion of the conduct of operations by "Italicus,"
has been made for The Journal of American History by Colonel V. di
Bernezzo, Military Attache of the Royal Italian Embassy to the
[21]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
United States. It has been translated into English by Captain C. H.
Huntingdon, Assistant to the Military Attache.
Opinions of C5r rman flut!)oi0 on tfjt action of tfje Italian
Critfctem becoming to
HE particular conditions in which the war was carried
out on the Italian front are not sufficiently known,
and this has been the reason that even writers of
authority, like Falkenhayn, 1 were able to give about
our military operations a general opinion without
foundation and therefore inexact.
Other writers, too, of a certain notoriety, have expressed malig-
nant opinions. First among these is the Prussian general, Von Cra-
mon, who was for four years chief of the German mission at Austrian
general headquarters, 2 a surrounding in which the hate toward our
country was pushed to the unbelievable. Conrad never named Italy, 8
Cramon tells us, without the epithet of treacherous he who had in
1907 proposed to attack Italy, an allied nation that was then showing
towards Austria the most remissive behavior possible.
The "calomniez, il en restera toujours quelque chose" warns us
that we must not leave a free field to slanderers ; the task, anyway, to
put the truth in its right light is rather easy: the elements are fur-
nished by Cramon himself; one has only to examine his story of the
battle of the Piave.
It is in the middle of June, 1918. "The spirit of the Austrian
troops who were about to attack was excellent. Officers and men
were anxious, like in the first weeks of the war, to measure themselves
against the 'Welschen.' '
Everything was technically ready for the great offensive : at last
both Conrad and Boreovic had declared it explicitly. Requested by
the Emperor to say if, on their conscience, the attack could begin, they
had both answered "Yes." 8 "Of the sixty Divisions, twenty-eight
were arranged for attacking in the Asiago region." 9
iVon Falkenhayn, "Die Oberste Heeresleitung, 1914-16," Berlin, Mittler & Sohn, 19.20.
2Von Cramon, 'Unser Oesterreich Ungarischer Bundesgenosse im Welt Kriege," Berlin, Mittler
& Sohn, 1920.
sVon Cramon, page 55. Cramon, page 169. sCramon, page 170. eCramon, page 165.
[22]
ITALIAN MILITARY ACTION IN THE WORLD WAR
The prologue of the great offensive was a demonstrative action
on the Tonale.
"The preparations for this were known under the conventional
name of 'the avalanche.' But unhappily the facts did not correspond
to the words ; the attack was immediately held up." 7
On June I5th Cramon was in Meran with the Emperor and Arz,
the Austrian Chief of Staff. The first news of the offensive was
excellent. There was also present the Archduke Frederick, who car-
ried with him a marshal's baton, gift of the Austrian Generals, which
was to be presented to the Emperor in Vicenza, or in other Italian
territory, as a souvenir of the victory. 8
In the evening, though, during supper, after the toasts, "Arz was
called to the telephone and came back very serious . . . . "
"After dinner we knew that the joy of victory had unhappily been
premature. On the Asiago Plateau and east of the Brenta Italian
counter-attacks had thrown the Imperial troops entirely back into
their jumping-off positions."
"Also, on both sides of the Oderzo-Treviso railway, the principal
attack of Marshal Boreovic had been broken in the first hours."
"....Arz received from a conversation with Conrad, deeply
depressed, the exact impression that the force of attack of the Tyrol
group of armies was completely exhausted ; none of its divisions could
be for the present considered in condition of fighting." 8
Nor were Boreovic's divisions, so Cramon tells us, in any differ-
ent conditions.
(The author then examines the causes of this Austrian defeat,
and comes to the conclusion that it was caused, not by the Italian
Command having known the hour of attack, nor by an excessive
extension of the front of attack, but by the Austrian High Command
having committed the fundamental error of not having estimated the
Italian Army at its true value.)
Nor is the example of the Piave the only one which can be used
to prove, by using the facts told by Cramon, the absurdity of his slan-
dering campaign.
In the same way, speaking about the Austrian Offensive in 1916,
he admits 10 that it had reached, before the coming into action of Brus-
TCramon, page 166. sCramon, page 176. oCramon, page 165.
H'Cramon, page 57.
[23]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
siloff, "the maximum results," and that it could not have continued
without important reinforcements which were not at their disposal.
And yet this offensive was carried out by the "finest flower of the Aus-
trian troops." 1
Much more measured and impartial is the judgment of Falken-
hayn, who (the author says) recognizes that Italy's coming into the
field of battle was of great importance for the results of the war."
If the Italian Army did not accomplish great territorial conquests,
it nevertheless powerfully contributed, as is assured by Ludendorf f , to
the wearing out of the Austrian Army 13 and caused its final
disruption.
To say, like Cramon (page 21), that "the entry of Italy in the
war was not a motive to interrupt the offensive against Russia; she
then really did not deserve the help given to her by the Russians in
the summer of 1916," means to assert the contrary of truth.
II
fepnttjegig of t&t 3taIian=liluG3ian=li\timaman Cooperation in 1915-16
The help of Italy to Russia had begun before our entry into the
war. Before the great German- Austrian Offensive of May, 1915,
against the giant of the East, there were "considerable forces" 1
assembled at our frontier. Nor did our preventive influence on opera-
tions cause only this sensible diminuation of forces. When, in the
beginning of May, 1915, the Russian front was broken, the pursuit
could not be carried out by the German- Austrians without preoccupa-
tions, though the conditions of the Russian Army would have
allowed it.
Mackensen's group of armies was given the task of remaining
north of the upper Vistula, close upon the enemy, and south of the
river, to reach as quickly as possible the line, San-Wiznia-Dniester :
"only when in safe possession of this important sector would new
dispositions be given. The reason of such a proceeding was due to
Italy's conduct." 13
When war was declared, other important forces were added to
iiFalkenhayn, page 204. izFalkenhayn, page 83.
i3Ludendorff, "Meine Kriegs Errinnerungen," Berlin, Mittler & Solm, 1919, at page 384.
l4Falkenhayn, page 81. isFalkenhayn, page 77.
[24]
ITALIAN MILITARY ACTION IN THE WORLD WAR
those already against us. Germany sent into Tyrol the Bavarian Alpen
Korps, a division specially trained for mountain fighting, and a good
number of heavy batteries on the Isonzo. 16 Austria had to withdraw
from the Russian front one army corps, the Seventh, and one moun-
tain brigade, the Fifty-ninth. Two more army corps and one division
were withdrawn from the Serbian front (XVth and XVIth Corps and
Fifty-eighth Division) troops composed mainly of Alpine brigades
or Hungarian divisions." To these troops, mentioned in the German-
Austrian official sources, others were added in the summer of 1915,
following our offensive. One is therefore not far from the truth in
asserting that Italy, in 1915, tied down to her front a force equivalent
to about twenty divisions. Even when advanced autumn rendered
operations on the Alps impossible, Austria, though invited by Germany
to reinforce the Third Austrian Army, which could not at first -over-
come the Serbian resistance, refused to withdraw any forces from the
Italian Front. 18 Italy, in fact, during the fight of the Central Powers
against Serbia, carried out a bloody and obstinate offensive, lasting
about forty days, which cost our Third Army alone seventy thousand
men, killed and wounded.
On the basis of these data one can infer what would have hap-
pened to Russia and the Allies if, in 1915, the Central Powers could
have freely disposed of the forces on the Italian front ; the more so,
considering that Serbia, who had remained inactive during all 1915,
would not have been capable of moving, if \ve had not come into the
fray; nor could have Rumania, in such condition, taken that preoccupy-
ing stand which induced the Central Powers to leave, during the sum-
mer of 1915, a few divisions at close call of the Rumanian frontier.
But Cramon's assertion about the undeserved help given us by
the Russians in the summer of 1916 is, as already said, contrary to
the truth. Brussiloff's offensive was an unexpected action for the
German-Austrians, but not improvised in help of Italy. It was an
offensive arranged months before among the allies, which ought to
have been carried out before June, and which, for various reasons,
had been delayed.
The Austrian offensive against Italy caused its beginning a few
loFalkenhayn, page 86.
)T"Der Krieg Gegen Italicn" (pamphlet by Streffleurs) Seidel & Sohn, Wien, 1918, page 35.
mFalkenhayn, page 149.
[25]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
days sooner; but it did not disturb its accomplishment; on the con-
trary, it made it extraordinarily easier.
To believe, like Falkenhayn, 19 that the attack ought to have been
made only on July first, is not only to err as to actual facts, but is a
military deduction which does not correspond to the situation. Where
is the leader who lets slip by the opportunity to attack the enemy while
he has weakened himself in front of him to fight elsewhere, and waits
forty-five days to begin an action on his side, allowing in this way the
adversary to finish the distant operations and to bring back his forces?
The fact is that the Austrian front had been so much weakened,
to furnish men for the war against Italy, that Brussiloff won as he
wished. "After a relatively short preparation of artillery the Rus-
sians had jumped out of their trenches and went forward without hesi-
tation. Only in a few places had they taken the trouble to form
groups of attack, by massing their reserves . . . . " : " .... As appeared
afterwards, the Galician front was not only weakened by the with-
drawal of units to the Italian front, but the power of resistance had
also, for the same reason, been weakened by every possible means,
because the numerous artillery, whose importance is known for troops
of little morale, had been taken away, and besides this, there had been
withdrawn from the Galician front a considerable number of the
reliable elements, partly through exchange and partly through replace-
ment with unreliable ones. In this way was the disaster explained ;" 2
nor are the conclusions of Hindenburg's calm and masterly work any
different. 22
There is no need to add anything more to confute Cramon's
statements; but it may be worth while to make perfectly clear what
effects the events we have spoken of had on the general conduct of
the war. Even as the great Russian victory was greatly helped by
the fighting in the Tyrol, so did this victory bring a palpable blow to
the German operations on the French front, and facilitate the British
offensive on the Somme in the summer of I9i6. 2s
Nor was the Italian cooperation towards the fortunate Russian
offensive limited to the reaction shown against the Austrian offen-
sive. Cadorna, notwithstanding the efforts made to hold up the
l9Falkenhayn, page 206. 20Falkenhayn, page 206. 2iFalkenhayn, page 211.
22Hindenburg, "Aus meinem Leben," Hirzel, Leipzig, 1920, pages 141, 144.
2 3 Falkenhayn, page 210.
[26]
ITALIAN MILITARY ACTION IN THE WORLD WAR
>
attack, not only immediately took up again the offensive against the
Austrians on the Plateau, but was able to anticipate the enemy on the
Isonzo, by inflicting the grave defeat of Gorizia."
After the battle of Gorizia the Italian Army powerfully ham-
mered the Austrian Army with the Seventh, Eighth and Ninth Battles
of the Isonzo, in September, October and November, preventing the
withdrawal from that front of Divisions to reinforce those operating
against Rumania. "The Austro-Hungarian troops there (on the
Isonzo) were so worn out that no forces for use against Rumania
could be withdrawn." 2
In 1917 Italy's action in the fight against Austria was gradually
taking more importance than the Russian one, until, following Keren-
ski's unfortunate offensive in July, 1917, and the advent of the
Bolsheviki to the Petrograd government, Italy and Austria remained
alone against each other. Italy, with the Bainsizza offensive, put the
near Empire in serious danger.
The decision, retarded by the Caporetto disaster, did not fail.
Italy immediately afterwards knew how to arise again with high spirit
on the Grappa. The defeat inflicted by us on the Piave in June, 1918,
marked the moral, and Vittorio Veneto the material, disaster of the
Austrian Army.
In face of these facts, which summarize the fight between us and
Austria, is it worth saying that this hard and bitter contest happened
near the Isonzo, instead of two or three hundred kilometers beyond?
Ill
elimination of Strategical aim {Tactical Contrition* ot tfy
In this the author gives an accurate and profound examination
of the strategical and tactical conditions of the Italian-Austrian War.
STRATEGICAL CONDITIONS. The study of the Italian and
Austrian railway systems puts our inferiority clearly in evidence,
because, until 1914, the railway situation of Italy towards the Aus-
trian front had defensive characteristics that is railroad lines of
.'.kenhayn, page 138. ?-'-I.u<fendorff. page ajo.
! n I
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
small carrying-power so as not to give means to the enemy in case
of invasion ; and even if those railways had had the necessary carrying-
power, in the Trentino, they were too far from the strategic objectives
to be reached. Now it is known that railroads have a capital impor-
tance in the vital question of supplies and evacuations of an army.
The trend of our frontier was most threatening for us : a blow from
the Tyrol threatened the rear of the whole army, and a blow on the
Isonzo was a grave threat to our mountain-front. In both cases, the
Austrian railways arrived nearly to the jumping off line of the enemy
attack. Therefore in the strategical situation there was to our advan-
tage only the possibility of a wearing-down warfare ; against us stood
the extreme sensibility of our front, with the sword of Damocles
always threatening not the head, but the back of our forces.
TACTICAL CONDITIONS. As to the conditions of tactical
action on the Italian- Austrian theatre of operations, one must consider
that, of 550 kilometers front, 500 were mountains, the rest Carso.
The author reminds us that all military writers agree in noting the
great difficulties presented by mountain warfare.
Undoubtedly the Austrians were confronted with the same diffi-
culties in their offensives ; but for them the mountainous part to cross
was much shorter, and their objective was clear: they were near to
our plains. Contrarily, on all the mountain front, behind the first
chain of mountains, rose another still harder one, and then still
others, as obstacles against us.
Such unfavorable strategical and tactical conditions were to
weigh heavily on the execution of our war. In the mountains every
offensive on our part came up against exceptional difficulties; the
possibilities of great offensives were therefore limited to a narrow
front, which excluded, very nearly, the possibility of surprise.
On the defensive front the importance of not losing any ground,
so as not to render the already delicate strategical situation more dan-
gerous, obliged us to hold the line with more men than was necessary
to the enemy.
All this, given the extension of our front, was the reason why the
forces at disposal for attacking the Julian front were limited as com-
pared to other armies. Now, the less an offensive is extended, the
more it fears the action of lateral artilleries.
[28]
ITALIAN MILITARY ACTION IN THE WORLD WAR
IV
Crump
In this chapter the author examines the value of the Austrian
Army as a whole, and in its elements, the soldiers. According to
writings and documents of military authors like Cramon, Falkenhayn,
Hindenbtirg and Alice Schalek, he comes to the conclusion that the
Austrian Army was excellent and the Austrian soldier an excellent
fighter. Special moral conditions also increased the value of the
Austrian soldiers in the war against us, notwithstanding their differ-
ent nationalities.
Hindenburg, at page 260 of his book, "Aus meinem Leben," also
takes note of this fact with the words : "Against Russia the Austrian
Army was fighting with its soul alone, but against Italy with its
heart as well."
The fact is that against us was used always the best part of the
Austrian Army, which on our front always showed a high degree of
fighting spirit. The opinions of the authors above named are abso-
lutely explicit in this matter.
No one more than the Italians can confirm this opinion about
yesterday's enemy; but if such was the enemy we had to face, why
speak with such contempt, if even veiled, of our Army, which had to
surmount still greater difficulties and was nearly always on the offen-
sive in the mountains, instead of remaining on the defensive, like
the enemy?
V
tt Jtalian'frrncf) Cooperation in tfjr Spring ano Summer
Campaign, 1017
(i) The 1917 Campaign in Italy Foreign Depreciations Results
Obtained and Sacrifices Accomplished by Italy
Having thus corrected, by our opponent's own words, the errors
concerning the part which Italy had in the war ; there remains to give
an answer to some publications, on the allied side, which show that
[29]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
even they did not appreciate dispassionately all that our generous
country did for the common cause.
Commandant de Civrieux calls his documented work about the
French offensive of 1917 "Pages de verite." We will therefore use,
essentially, his data to rectify his opinions and those of others about
the Italian action. 28
During the war, in the breathless seeking of a victorious solution
which could never be obtained, each of the allies or enemies saw its
own effort and considered it greater than that of the others. This is
only human, and equally human one can admit the fact to be that
somebody, not completely informed about the conditions in which the
fight was going on on the other fronts, could have thought that the
allies did not do all they could.
In this manner, and in no other, can one explain the words which,
according to the French authors, Lloyd George is supposed to have
said in the Paris meeting of May 4, 1917: "It is on the shoulders of
France and of Great Britain that the whole burden of war is weigh-
ing. What Russia can do is a mystery. What Italy can or will do we
know enough." 2 The French deputy, Galli, reporter of the Par-
liamentary Committee for the Army, gives the words as follows:
"What Italy can or will do we do not know enough." 2
As a matter of fact the British minister might have considered
that several German Armies, about eighty divisions, 29 were on the Rus-
sian front, that the Austrian Army did not bother France and England
in the least, and that therefore somebody was thinking of keeping it
busy; but the best answer was given by the Italian Army with its
blood. From May I2th to June 4th there raged on the Carso the tenth
battle of the Isonzo; from August I7th to September I2th, the
eleventh. The military results were considerable on the Carso
important positions wrenched from the enemy. Further north the
Second Army had crossed the Isonzo and conquered the formidable
elevations which commanded the river, from a height of over 1,500
feet, pushing through the enemy lines to a depth of over 10 kilometers.
The Second Army had accomplished one of the most difficult tactical
zeCommandant De Civrieux, "Pages de verite," L'offensive de 1917 et le commandement du
general Nivelle, Paris, Van Oest, 1919.
27De Civrieux, page 188.
28Henry Galli, L'Offensive Franchise de 1917," Gamier, Paris, 1919, page 203.
2See the publication of the Great German General Staff, "Die Schlachten und Gefechten, 1914-1918,"
Sack, Berlin, 1919.
[30]
ITALIAN MILITARY ACTION IN THE WORLD WAR
actions, the crossing of a river in front of an enemy in position, and
at the same time the carrying of a mountain position. Here were,
together, the difficulties which were confronted, separately, on June
i$th, 1918, by the army groups of Boreovic and Conrad: 53,494 Aus-
trians were taken prisoners, the enemy army was no more in condi-
tion to withstand another Italian offensive, and the German plans of
conquest of Moldavia, 80 which was to have given to the Central Powers
"a territory extremely rich in the raw materials necessary to the war
and which we were lacking/' 31 were completely upset.
But all this had not been accomplished without heavy losses:
36,000 killed, 96,000 wounded and 26,000 prisoners, of the Second
and Third Army in our spring offensive, and 40,000 killed, 108,000
wounded and 18,500 prisoners in the one of August- September ; a total
of 280,000 casualties and 45,000 prisoners 325,000 men, in round
figures, for these two offensives alone, in the two armies, without
counting the 24,000 killed and wounded and the 2,000 prisoners, for
instance, lost in the operation of the Sixth Army on the Ortigara, on
the Asiago Plateau, in June of that year.
This is the volume of the blood shed by Italy in 1917 for her great
spring and summer offensives : he who has done more, let him say so !
Realizing the threat hanging over the Austrian Army, Germany
decided to operate against us "to prevent Austria's downfall." 3 The
strategical conditions. on our sector, as we have summarized it, was
favorable to the Central Powers: the Italian Army, and particularly
our Second Army, was for the moment tired out. The Caporetto
defeat broke down our whole Julian front.
Now it is in war as in battle: as all make a tremendous effort,
each one thinks his own is the greatest. One can explain, therefore,
that the Allies, immediately after the Bainsizza, asked Italy for
another offensive, which our leader suspended when he saw the threat
of the enemy offensive. Nor is it extraordinary that, in that situation,
the Allies should have called back to France the few batteries granted
for the preceding offensive; but it is not permissible that, after the
events, each should try to claim the entire glory.
But going back to the spring offensive, why say, as does De Civ-
rieux, "Notwithstanding so many requests, based on the most sacred
soCramon, page 126, and Ludendorff, page 383. SiLudendorff, page 237.
ssLudendorff, page 384.
[31]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
and legitimate reasons, Russians and Italians remained at rest, while
French and British were launched to the attack of formidable German
positions. A total inactivity persists on the vast eastern front till the
end of June, the time in which Brusilof f and Korniloff launched their
offensive of Volinia and Galicia. Only on May I4th Cadorna decrees
a general attack on the Isonzo and the Carso. And at this same date,
the western battle having ended on the French front, though continu-
ing on the British sector, General Nivelle is replaced in the supreme
command by General Petain.
"From then on, and for a long time, till after the defeats of the
spring of 1918, all major operations disappear from the horizons of
French territory always violated, if not surrendered." 33
Any one who in the study of history follows the worship of truth,
must render incontestable admiration to the French Army, which held
back the first German push of 1914 and sustained the slaughter of
Verdun; but this high respect must not veil the eyes in judging the
events of 1917, in a discussion which refers, after all, only to the
action of the commands.
Strategy is common sense. Let us leave Russia for the moment
alone ; in April she had a newly-born revolution at home, and that was
not the moment for offensives. To fight, there must be some one to
command. Without any doubt, if Russia could have done in May
what she did in July, the German High Command would have found
itself in troubled waters. 34
As it concerns Italy, the criticism of De Civrieux has no reason
for its existence. What is meant by concurrent actions? That they
should be carried out on the same day, perhaps? Has this the least
influence on the result of operations ? What must be avoided is that
the enemy, in front of two separate offensives, should manoeuvre by
internal lines, by carrying reinforcements against the mass which
attacks first, so as to defeat it while the other remains inactive. Is
this Italy's case? Did the Central Powers take away, in the spring
of 1917, one single man or gun from the Italian front to send him
into France or Russia? Would it have been in any way possible to
do so?
Even if the Italians had conquered, in April, 1917, all they took
33De Civrieux, page 126. 34Ludendorff, page 339.
[32]
ITALIAN MILITARY ACTION IN THE WORLD WAR
in the two offensives of May and August- September, 1917; even if
the Austrian Army should have been reduced in April to the condi-
tions in which it found itself in September, Ludendorff was not the
man to commit the unpardonable error of withdrawing a single man
from the Franco-British front while the battle was raging in France.
Nivelle himself did not believe it. "It is certain that, no matter what
happens on the Eastern or the Italian fronts, he will not take away any
element for their help on the Western front, as long as the Franco-
British threat shall not have subsided." 3
The Italian cooperation with the Franco-British offensive existed,
and completely so : not one enemy man or gun passed from our front
to the Franco-British or any other front. But General Nivelle's
strange pretexts deserve, in the interest of our own country, to be
discussed.
(2) Nivelle's Abstractions
Nivelle, by the telegram of March i6th to Cadorna, through the
French Mission in Udine, by the letter of March 2ist to Painleve, and
by a telegram of April igth, handed to the Italian Supreme Command
by the French Mission with a letter dated April 2Oth, requested
Cadorna, reminding him of the agreements taken in February, to take
the offensive.
These requests seem to De Civrieux of a "nettete impressionante."
The agreement of Chantilly was to be ready in the first fortnight
of February for the general offensive, and to launch it, if circum-
stances were not opposed, at the same time, that is within the limit of
three weeks, at the date fixed by common agreement of the Comman-
ders-in-Chief."
In February Cadorna was ready: was Nivelle ready? 17 It is cer-
tain that he had lost the opportunity of attacking the Germans while
they were retreating from the Arras-Soissons front to the Siegfried-
Stellung. This operation, that is the gradual withdrawal of material
and artilleries, began on February Qth.
As came out in the investigation of the French parliamentary
sHenry Galli, pafe 83, Report prepared by Nivelle, on 4-5-1917, for the War Council of Compiegne.
BeAgreement of Chantilly, De Civrieux, page 4.
srPainleve, Minister of War, page 22, "on the Aisnc front nothing was ready. Even on April 16
our preparations were far from complete."
[33]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
committee, intimations of this withdrawal were received in February
on the British front ; 88 on March 4th General Franchet d'Esperey thor-
oughly warned Nivelle of this fact. He proposed a sudden attack on
the enemy's first lines, so as to surprise him and capture the artillery
which had remained in position. Preparations could have been made
in six days.
The withdrawal of the German troops began on March i6th, as
planned. 89 On March 7th Nivelle had decided not to attack. On
March nth the revolution broke out in Petrograd. On the I4th the
Petrograd agency gave out the news. On that same day the Austrians
informed us of it from the trenches. From the end of February there
was clearly shown, in the Trentino enemy, activity in the preparation
of a major operation. In March the enemy artillery \vas greatly
increased on the Asiago and Tonezza Plateaus, and more war materials
arrived. One noted the arrival of fresh Austrian troops and of Ger-
man troops on the higher Adige. The French Intelligence Service
must have confirmed to Nivelle these probable intentions of the
enemy. 40
The pretence that Cadorna should not take into consideration the
facts that the German withdrawal deeply modified the conditions of
operations on the French front, that the Russian revolution checked,
at least for the moment, the Russian offensive, that the enemy was
making offensive preparations in Tyrol, proves that Nivelle had
formed an inaccurate opinion of the Italian Commander. Cadorna
did not need any spurring to give to the common cause the full and
unconditional cooperation of the Italian forces. Nine offensive bat-
tles on the Isonzo, besides the 1916 operations in the Trentino, from
the beginning of July, 1915, to the end of October, 1916, were there to
show it.
And neither this time did he need any spurring on. On April
I9th, as soon as the situation was clear in the Trentino, one day before
receiving Nivelle's telegram, he had sent out the executive orders for
the offensive on the Julian front, which was to begin on May 7th.
Bad weather conditions obliged the operation to be postponed for
about a week, to the extreme regret of the Italian commander.
It was not in the Entente's interest to expose the Italian Army to
SSGalli, page 57 and following; Painleve, page 23.
39Ludendorff, page 323. 40Henry Galli, page 83.
[34]
ITALIAN MILITARY ACTION IN THE WORLD WAR
great danger ; and one does not begin an offensive on the Isonzo when
there is a threat pending from the Trentino. "To keep the initiative
of operations" is Nivelle's constant preoccupation, and to a certain
point it can be explained. It is natural that in his mind should pre-
dominate the memory of Verdun, where he had reaped so much glory.
Now at Verdun the initiative taken by the Germans in the middle of
February, 1916, had broken up all plans of a Franco-British offensive.
But the initiative of operations, too, is subordinate to the needs of
strategy, that is to common sense applied to the leading of armies.
The initiative of operations, the imposing on the enemy one's own
will, is an advantage. This, if one precedes the enemy in prepara-
tions, and delivers a blow in a vital point; in substance, when one
attacks, as in February, 1916, at Verdun. But the case is different
when these conditions are not present. What would a victorious
offensive on the Carso have mattered if the enemy could have replied
with a powerful push from the Tyrol, threatening to compromise the
whole Italian Army and also the Entente, in that situation? Nivelle
thought to insure for himself the initiative of operations by attacking,
in April, 1917, in France, without perceiving that this was already
gravely compromised. The withdrawal and the destructions accom-
plished in the evacuated zone, without any interference in February
and March, had taken away from Nivelle, for a certain time, the
possibility of carrying out an attack on the most vulnerable part of
the front. It was not so much a rectifying of the front which, after
all, as Nivelle told the War Committee, did not diminish to any amount
the strength of the enemy in the line, as a real, though temporary,
diminution for over one hundred kilometers of the front at disposal
for a great attack. In this zone there could be sent into the line tired
or inferior divisions, and artilleries could be withdrawn to all advan-
tage of the remaining sector of attack. "The number of German bat-
teries spotted in action had augmented to over one hundred per cent,
from January to April." 41
As a whole Nivelle's initiative had been reduced to being able to
attack, certainly with a great numerical superiority, in the Laon sec-
tor, where the enemy, informed as to the intentions of the French
Command, had cleverly prepared a terrain which, according to Foch,
4iGalli, page 127. Report of Parliamentary Committee.
[351
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
"is not adapted to artillery attacks." 4 As a conclusion, the German
move had completely changed the situation. As soon as the with-
drawal was noticed, that is in February and at the beginning of March,
if one did not want to attack at once the enemy in retreat, there would
have been time to modify the French attack without causing an appre-
ciable delay. The northern front had been put aside by Nivelle on
account of the uncertainty of the climate; the eastern front, because
there would not have been any liaison with the British. 43 Now the
liaison had been annulled by the German retreat. And it was not even
the case of fearing that the enemy would attack, because, undergoing
himself a crisis through this vast movement of men and material,
he would certainly not have undertaken a large offensive.
But Nivelle did not introduce any substantial modification. He
limited himself, as a whole, to widen the attack to a certain amount
in the Laon sector and went on rigidly, according to the plan he had
fathered so long, and from which he hoped for the end of the war.
Naturally the attack on the Eastern front was reduced to a recon-
naissance on St. Quentin, immediately broken off.
There was no modification either at the beginning of April,
when he knew that documents, showing the plan of attack of an army,
carried to the front line, had fallen into the enemy's hands. 44 He
attacked on April i6th, when the exceptional bad weather should
have advised a short postponement above all, for the colonial army
corps. The motive which had eliminated the Northern front was held
no more in consideration by him, though, among the conditions
imposed on him by the Government for the execution of his plan, was
that of attacking only with good weather. 45 "It seems," ends the report
of the Parliamentary Committee, "that the Commander-in-Chief,
without perhaps enough considering the experience of September,
1915, and fearing an intervention which he wished to avoid at any
price, has shown a great impatience for action and for engaging
himself to the limit, though he did not ignore the fresh difficulties
which were arising." 4
With this the Committee lets us understand that Nivelle would
have avoided any postponement for fear of the Minister deciding to
42Galli, page 245. *3Oallj, page 45. 44Galli, page in.
43Painleve, page 30. 46Galli, page 115.
[36]
ITALIAN MILITARY ACTION IN THE WORLD WAR
withdraw his consent to the execution of his plan, as there was motive
to believe.
(3) The French Conduct of the War in the Summer of 1917 Accord-
ing to de Civrieux Italy's Effort to Prevent the Attack
Against Rumania
To resume, the criticism against Italy for her delay in interven-
tion does not stand on its feet. In the World War there is military
glory for everyone, friends and foes; therefore no one must try to
deprive Italy of the merits which are her due. No one can question
the first place in sacrifices sustained by Italy in the spring and sum-
mer of 1917.
But what is stranger is that the criticism should come from
de Civrieux, who tells us that in all that time France did not follow
the energetic conduct of the war which he himself judges was neces-
sary. 47 De Civrieux writes that "the only serious operation attempted
by Petain after his being raised to the Command (May 10, 1917) was
the one called the battle of Malmaison, a tactical operation carried out
on October 23, 1917."" Not only so, but de Civrieux himself insists,
and with right, on the imprudent words spoken on July 7, 1917, by
the Minister, Painleve, at the French Chamber, "One must finish
with these ambitious and reckless plans, which under magnificent
appearances scarcely hide emptiness and unpreparedness," etc.
"Therefore," continues de Civrieux, "the Imperial General Staff
rapidly and exactly informed, did not ignore the fact that the official
words of the Minister of War did not hide any stratagem. These
words of an impressive ingenuity expressed a war doctrine exposed
for several months to the light of day and the appliance of which had
become a reality of every moment. For this reason Hindenbtirg,
reassured against any possibility of near changes in the French plans,
and sure of not having to face anything more than local and limited
offensives between the Oise and Switzerland, did not hesitate in
withdrawing from the Western front a certain number of divisions
and transporting them rapidly against Russia.
"On July 1 6th the Germans were then able to begin a powerful
4TDe Cirrieux, page 267. tDc Civrieux. page 243.
[371
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
counter-offensive from Tarnopol to the Dniester. On their side the
Austrian armies, deployed on their left in direction of Lemberg, reoc-
cupied Halicz; then, extending their movement offensively along the
wooded Carpatian Mountains, completed the rout of the decisively
wavering Russian armies. Galicia and Bukovina were lost, Bessara-
bia and Moldavia were threatened with invasion. All the faint hopes
laid in the soldiers of the Russian revolution foundered.
"One month later the great city of Riga was taken, Livonia was
invaded, the Baltic coast was taken as far as the Gulf of Finland,
Petrograd was threatened. At the same time the only hope of salva-
tion seemed lost." 4
It is difficult to establish whether Painleve's words had weight
or not in Hindenburg's and Ludendorff's decisions. The Nivelle-
Petain-Painleve discussion has become a personal question.
If the synchronizing of efforts with Russia could not have been
carried out in April, because the Russians were then powerless, the
union of efforts could have been obtained if Petain had attacked in
France at the beginning of July, doing all that was possible to prevent
the Germans from transporting against the Russians those seven divi-
sions 50 which in the second half of July broke up the Russian offensive,
so well begun in the first half of the month. Strategic cooperation
must consist essentially in this: preventing the enemy from manoeuv-
ering by internal lines; not allowing him, by massing his forces, to
overpower one of the Allies.
But it is useless to throw "ifs" around. Let us remain with the
facts. From May, 1917, on Petain spared his army, while Cadorna
lavished his in bloody offensives, conscious of doing all that was pos-
sible for great, dying Russia, and, at least, to save Rumania. In con-
clusion : either one of the two leaders operated in a way which did not
correspond to the general situation ; or the sparing at that time of the
French Army, after the glorious and sanguinary trials of 1914, 1916
and April, 1917, was an unavoidable necessity, as Painleve explicitly
admits. In either case, do not let us take away from Italy the merit of
having, in 1917, taken France's place in the martyrdom of the war.
In any case, Italy's sacrifice was not in vain for the general cause :
besides the blows inflicted on the Austrian Army, it saved Moldavia
49De Civrieux, page 239.
OOLudendorff, pages 345-348; six divisions and the Alpen-Krops.
[38]
ITALIAN MILITARY ACTION IN THE WORLD WAR
from a new invasion, and prevented the enemy from laying his hands
on that rich territory, which would have given new life to the famished
empires.
VI
<Q$t Htue Palliation ot tf)t Italian flrmp
We have tried to rectify, by showing the inaccuracies of friends
and ex-enemies, the synthesis of Italy's effort in the war. How many,
and what useless, and for some what harmful discussions! And
what can one say of those foreign libels, circulated under-hand, which
for political purposes try to undervalue our army and its
accomplishments ?
Blind people ! what is the use of a partisan depreciation on paper,
when the exact valuation has already been shown on the field of battle
by the enemy and has been confirmed by events?
In such a long war the valor of an army is measured by the
enemy forces in front of it, taking in account the offensive or defen-
sive purpose and the terrain.
Now the proportion between the Italian and the enemy forces, on
the Alps and on the Carso, was not any greater than the Entente had
on the other fronts. As to fighting spirit, no one can ignore that,
from July ist, 1915, to the end of August, 1917, in twenty-six months,
there were on the Isonzo alone eleven battles, and one great action in
the Trentino: one major operation every two months, without count-
ing the bloody fights in the Alps.
Let there be an end, therefore, to vain comparisons and a more
or less veiled work of defamation : truth opens easily its way.
Let us try to tell the events of the war, remembering that the
main purpose of history is to know one's self.
Only one who knows himself completely is master of himself and
can prevent himself being dragged away by events. From the Aus-
trian defeat on the Piave to the present abesement of Germany, the
first cause of insuccess was always the same: the despisal of the
enemy, caused by excessive self -exaltation of one's own merits.
[39]
(Eampaigu
BT
CHARLES NEVERS HOLMES
URING the thirty-three presidential elections in the
United States, only five political parties have suc-
ceeded in electing their respective candidates. These
five parties were the Federalists, Democratic-Repub-
licans, Democrats, Whigs, and the present Republican
party. The Federalist party was in power until the
beginning of the Nineteenth Century, when the Democratic- Republi-
can party elected Thomas Jefferson. This Democratic-Republican
party became the Democratic party of Andrew Jackson, and under
the latter name it exists today. The chief opponent of the Democratic
party, during its earlier history, was the Whigs, and the Whig presi-
dential candidates were ejected in 1840 and 1848, the Democrats being
successful in 1844 (Polk), in 1852 (Pierce), and in 1856 (Buchanan).
The Whig party came to an end in 1852, when Franklin Pierce over-
whelmingly defeated its candidate, Winfield Scott. In fact, for a
while, the Democratic party was left in complete possession of our
Country's political battlefield.
Nevertheless, a powerful though scattered opposition to the vic-
torious Democratic party was present in this Nation, awaiting a proper
stimulus to unite. This opposition consisted of several elements. One
of these elements was, of course, the defeated Whig party; another
element the so-called ''Free Soilers," and there was still another ele-
ment which was nicknamed the "Know Nothings." The Whigs were
opposed to the Democrats on "general principles" and on economic
problems, the "Free Soilers" on the slavery question, while the "Know
Nothings," or American party, were interested in certain suffrage
reforms. However, at first, this scattered opposition was rather
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
feeble. It needed a proper stimulus to arouse it to full strength ; and
this proper stimulus was provided by the Democratic party itself.
The "Kansas-Nebraska Act" was the cause of the union of the
several political elements opposed to the Democratic party. As is well
known, this Congressional Act left to the people in the territories of
Kansas and Nebraska the decision whether slavery should be forbid-
den or allowed there. The "Kansas-Nebraska Act" became a law in
1854, and awakened a tremendous excitement throughout the North-
ern states. The "Compromise of 1820" had forbidden slavery in these
territorial regions, but, despite this positive prohibition, this "Kansas-
Nebraska Act" would permit slavery in these territories, provided
their people voted in favor of it. The result was that the North began
to line up more strictly against the South, and the history of our
country approached closer and closer to the terrible tragedy of the
Civil War.
Out of this tremendous excitement in the Northern states, a new
and powerful political party was rapidly created. Throughout the
summer and autumn of 1854 the several political elements opposed to
the "Kansas-Nebraska Act" and to the Democratic Party were coal-
escing energetically. Men like Lincoln, Sumner, Greeley, Hale,
Seward, Chase and Garrison became members of this new party, and
presently it was given its political name. It is not positively known
who first suggested the name "Republican," although such a sugges-
tion was made by Horace Greeley in a letter. It has been stated that
the name, "Republican Party," was chosen at a meeting of some thirty
members of the House of Representatives, upon the day following the
passage of the "Kansas-Nebraska Act." However that may have
been, this name was a natural one, for it had been used before in the
political history of the United States. It is said that the first official
adoption of this name was at a convention held in Jackson, Michigan,
on July 6, 1854. The term, "Republican Party," was also adopted by
state conventions in Maine, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois and Iowa.
During the first year of its existence, this new Republican party
had many successes, its popularity increasing as time went on. In the
Thirty-third Congress the Republican party was absolutely unknown,
whereas in the Thirty-fourth Congress, which met December 3, 1855,
the Senate contained fifteen Republicans and the House one hundred
[42]
FIRST REPUBLICAN-DEMOCRATIC CAMPAIGN
and eight Republicans. That is to say, the Senate had about one-
third as many Republicans as Democrats, and the House twenty-five
more Republicans than Democrats. In this first congressional cam-
paign of the Republican party, it won popular majorities in fifteen of
the thirty-one states, its successes being mostly in what was then
known as the "West." The new party was not as successful in the
Eastern states, particularly in New England, where many of the voters
continued to be "Whigs" and "Know Nothings." Unfortunately for
the Republican party, this Eastern tendency to vote for the "Whig-
Know Nothing-American party" continued until after the presidential
election of 1856.
In December, 1855, the Republican state committees in Ohio,
Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Wisconsin and Michigan
issued a call for a general convention at Pittsburgh, February 22, 1856,
to perfect a national organization. The members of this convention
chose a national committee and decided upon a national convention to
be held at Philadelphia, on June I7th. This "call" for the first national
Republican convention was addressed to "The people of the United
States, without regard to past political differences or divisions, who
are opposed to the repeal of the Missouri Compromise, to the policy of
the present administration, to the extension of slavery into the Terri-
tories, in favor of the admission of Kansas as a free state, and of
restoring the action of the Federal Government to the principles of
Washington and Jefferson."
When this first national Republican convention assembled at
Philadelphia, most of its delegates were in favor of the admission of
Kansas as a free state, excepting certain delegates from Delaware,
Maryland and Kentucky. It agreed upon a "Platform" which was
opposed to the repeal of the "Missouri Compromise," to the extension
of slavery to free territories, and to the refusal to admit Kansas as a
free state. This "Platform" further declared, "Resolved, That the
Constitution confers upon Congress sovereign power over the terri-
tories of the United States for their government and that in the exer-
cise of this power it is both the right and the imperative duty of Con-
gress to prohibit in the territories those twin relics of barbarism,
polygamy and slavery." It denounced the "Ostend Manifesto," which
announced that if Spain should refuse to sell Cuba to the United
[43]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
States, self-preservation would compel the United States to "wrest it
from her." It was in favor of a Pacific Railroad and of "appropria-
tions by Congress for the improvement of rivers and harbors of a
national character." However, this first "Platform" of the Republi-
can party made no mention at all of what was afterwards one of its
chief contentions, namely, the Tariff.
The Republican convention at Philadelphia having thus decided
upon its "Platform," its delegates next turned their attention to the
choice of presidential candidates. On the first ballot, John C. Fre-
mont, of California, received three hundred and fifty-nine votes;
McLean, one hundred and ninety-six ; Sumner, two, and Seward, one
vote. This necessitated a second ballot, and on this ballot Fremont
was nominated unanimously. Afterwards, there was an informal
ballot to choose a candidate for Vice-President. On this informal bal-
lot, William L. Dayton, of New Jersey, received two hundred and
fifty-nine votes ; Lincoln, one hundred and ten ; Banks, forty-six ; Wil-
mot, forty-three, and Sumner, thirty-five, with fifty-three votes scat-
tered. A formal vote was then taken, and Dayton was nominated
unanimously. The first Republican presidential candidates were,
therefore, Fremont and Dayton. Fremont's nomination was intended
to attract the votes of certain Free Soilers and Democrats, as well as
to provide a popular rallying phrase, "Free soil, free speech, free
men, and Fremont!" Dayton's nomination was made to please the
Whig element in the new party.
The Democratic convention met at Cincinnati, Ohio, on June 2,
1856. Its delegates agreed upon a "Platform" which was a renewal
of that of 1852, including the original "Platform of 1840," with addi-
tional resolutions approving the "Kansas-Nebraska Act" and the prin-
ciple of popular sovereignty, and condemning the "Know Nothing"
movement. This Democratic "Platform" of 1856 quoted "Resolution
7" from the "Platform of 1840," and declared, "That the foregoing
proposition covers, and was intended to embrace, the whole subject of
slavery agitation in Congress; and, therefore, the Democratic party
of the Union, standing on this national platform, will abide by, and
adhere to, a faithful execution of the acts known as the compromise
measures settled by the Congress of 1850, 'the act for reclaiming
fugitives from service labor' included; which act, being designed to
[44]
FIRST REPUBLICAN-DEMOCRATIC CAMPAIGN
carry out an express provision of the Constitution, cannot, with fidel-
ity thereto, be repealed, or so changed as to destroy or impair its effi-
ciency; that the Democratic party will resist all attempts at renewing
in Congress, or out of it, the agitation of the slavery question, under
whatever shape or color the attempt may be made."
In choosing their presidential candidate at Cincinnati, the Demo-
crats experienced much more difficulty than in making their "Plat-
form." The delegation was divided among James Buchanan, Franklin
Pierce and Stephen A. Douglas, and much excitement and bitterness
resulted. Indeed, no nomination was made until the seventeenth bal-
lot, when Buchanan, of Pennsylvania, was chosen. On the first ballot,
Buchanan received one hundred and thirty-five votes; Pierce, one hun-
dred and twenty-two, and Douglas, thirty-three. On the sixteenth
ballot, Buchanan received one hundred and sixty-eight votes and
Douglas one hundred and twenty-one. Buchanan was nominated on
the following ballot, and J. C. Breckinridge, of Kentucky, was after-
wards chosen as the Democratic candidate for Vice-President.
There was, also, a third party in this presidential campaign,
which was known as the "Know Nothing" or American party. The
members of this party acted in so peculiar and mysterious a manner
that members of the two other parties believed that the "Know Noth-
ings" were more powerful than they proved to be. This American
party nominated Millard Fillmore, of New York, for President, and
Andrew J. Donelson, of Tennessee, for Vice-President. In the elec-
tion, this third party polled a popular vote of 874,000, and won eight
electoral votes.
The first Republican-Democratic campaign was conducted with
great energy "up North," whereas "down South" there was practi-
cally no excitement. As would be expected, the citizens in the Southern
states had very little interest in the new party. Throughout the North,
however, there was great excitement, which was increased by parades,
bonfires, public meetings, eloquent speeches, songs and catchwords.
The subject of slavery was everywhere discussed, and, of course, this
subject intensified the political excitement. It was an old-fashioned
campaign, a pre-Civil War presidential campaign, and, although it
was not equal in general enthusiasm to that of 1840, this presidential
campaign of 1856 was by no means a dull one. The battle was between
[45]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
Buchanan and Breckinridge, Democrats, and Fremont and Dayton,
Republicans ; and James Buchanan, lawyer and statesman, was elected
over John Charles Fremont, explorer and soldier. Buchanan was
born in 1791, near Mercersburg, Pa.; Fremont in 1813, at Savannah,
Ga. Buchanan was a well-meaning man, but he possessed a vacillating
and not an energetic character. Fremont was a man of fine presence
and very popular. Nevertheless, Buchanan defeated Fremont in this
eighteenth presidential campaign by a national vote of 1,838,169 to
1,341,264, that is, by almost half a million votes.
In other words, Buchanan did not receive a plurality of the
popular vote about 4,000,000 votes and he received 377,633 fewer
votes than the Republican and American candidates together. When
the electoral votes were counted at Washington, February n, 1857, it
was announced that James Buchanan had received one hundred and
seventy-four such votes and John Charles Fremont one hundred and
fourteen votes, and, accordingly, that Buchanan had been elected
President by a plurality of fifty-two electoral votes over Fremont and
Fillmore, or by sixty more votes than the Republican candidate had
received. However, Buchanan was nearer defeat than his electoral
vote indicated, for had Fremont received the electoral votes of Penn-
sylvania and Illinois, he would have beaten Buchanan by a national
vote of one hundred and fifty-two to one hundred and thirty-six.
Nevertheless, the citizens of our Republic elected the Democratic can-
didate, and James Buchanan became the fifteenth President of the
United States.
At this point, it will be interesting to study and compare some
statistics respecting the electoral votes in this eighteenth presidential
campaign. Maryland, the thirty-first state, is not included, since it
cast its eight votes for Fillmore.
For President I 7 or V ice-President
State Buchanan Fremont Breckinridge Dayton
Maine 8 . . 8
New Hampshire . . 5 . . 5
Massachusetts . . 13 . . 13
Rhode Island . . 4 . . 4
Connecticut . . 6 . . 6
Vermont . . 5 5
[46]
FIRST REPUBLICAN-DEMOCRATIC CAMPAIGN
New York 35 . . 35
New Jersey 7 . . 7
Pennsylvania 27 . . 27
Delaware 3 . . 3
Virginia 15 . . 15
North Carolina 10 . . 10
South Carolina 8 . . 8
Georgia 10 . . 10
Kentucky 12 . . 12
Tennessee 12 . . 12
Ohio 23 . . 23
Louisiana 6 . . 6
Mississippi 7 . . 7
Indiana 13 . . 13
Illinois ii .. ii
Alabama 9 . . 9 . ;-ivi
Missouri 9 . . 9
Arkansas 4 . . 4
Michigan . . 6 . . 6
Florida 3 . . 3
Texas 4 . . 4
Iowa .. 4 .. 4
Wisconsin . . 5 . . 5
California 4 . . 4
Total 174 114 174 114
From the above table it will be seen that, in 1856, there were,
including Maryland, thirty-one states in our Republic, and that these
states possessed two hundred and ninety-six presidential electors.
Compared with this, our Nation consists at present of forty-eight
states, which possess five hundred and thirty-one electoral votes. In
1856, New York had thirty-five such votes, Pennsylvania twenty-
seven, Illinois eleven, and Ohio twenty-three. In 1920, New York has
forty-five votes, Pennsylvania thirty-eight, Illinois twenty-nine, and
Ohio twenty-four. In 1856, the Democrats carried nineteen states,
the Republicans eleven states. In that year, Pennsylvania, Indiana,
Illinois and New Jersey "went" Democratic. New York and Ohio
[47]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
chose Republican electors. It should be noted that although Fremont
was a resident of California, and a popular western hero, he did not
receive the electoral votes of California, Texas, and Missouri. Owing
to the free-state issue, he was handicapped by the Southern states vot-
ing against him a total electoral vote of 72.
Thus began and ended the first Republican-Democratic presiden-
tial campaign. It occurred sixty-four years ago, and is now almost
forgotten excepting by historical students. However, it was the initial
presidential battle between the two great parties which still exist, after
their sixteenth quadrennial combat. Since its birth, in 1828, the pres-
ent Democratic party has won ten times, although it has been defeated
by the present Republican party eleven times. And since its first vic-
tory over the Republican party in 1856, the Democratic party has
vanquished the Republicans four times, that is, in 1884, 1892, 1912,
and in the last election of 1916.
[48]
A jfawtfr r- Jamtlg of
in 9?nlp
BT
MABEL THACHER ROSEMARY WASHBURN
Secretary of The National Historical Society
SCAR KUHNS, in his "German and Swiss Settlements
of Colonial Pennsylvania," says: "From their first
appearance in Switzerland in the early decades of the
sixteenth century, the Mennonites were the victims of
systematic persecution on the part of their Reformed
brethren ; ......
"From time to time single families and individuals had fled across
the frontiers and sought refuge in the Palatinate, where Mennonite
communities had existed since 1527. In 1671 the first considerable
emigration took place, when .... seven hundred persons left their
native land and settled on the .... Rhine .... These Palatine Swiss
had to suffer the same trials as their neighbors, .... Poverty, floods,
.... finally induced large numbers of them to join their brethren in
Switzerland in the movement which resulted in the settlement on the
Pequea in Lancaster County."
Among these emigrating Mennonite families was that of Meily,
which is well entitled to the rank of a Founder-Family of Pennsyl-
vania, since it was one of those who made the first European settle-
ment of what is now Lancaster County, and, among these, was one
of the most eminent.
The family of Meily, or Meili (the name being spelled in various
other ways in the early Pennsylvania records), was of the Canton of
Zurich, in Switzerland. It is said that they lived originally in Hedin-
gen, in the said Canton; but one branch was of Winterthur, near
which is a place called Meilen, perhaps an early home of the family.
[49]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
The Coat-of-Arms is blazoned as of Winterthur, where their chief
estates may have been. This is described as follows :
"D'arg. a une tulipe de gu., accostee de deux rose du meme, les
fleurs alternant avec quatre f euilles de sin. ; le tout soutenu d'un tertre
de quatre coupeaux escarpes due memes. C. : les meubles de 1'ecu
(moins le tertre). L. : a dextre d'or et de gu., a sen. d'arg. et de gu."
This blazon, heraldically Anglicized, may be rendered :
Arms : Argent, a tulip gules, between two roses gules, the flowers
alternating with four leaves vert, the whole resting upon a mound of
four terraces vert.
Crest : The flowers and leaves of the shield.
Mantling: Dexter side, or and gules; sinister side, argent and
gules.
A valuable paper presented before the Lancaster County Histori-
cal Society in 1910 states that the Seventeenth Century opened with
the efforts of Count Witgenstein, Lord of Hamburg, and a Calvinist,
to exterminate from his domains Catholicism, and the various bodies
of Lutherans and Anabaptists; and that, in 1601, a decree against
the last was issued at Groningen, Switzerland, this followed by severe
measures in Zurich and elsewhere. Among the Anabaptists were the
Mennonites, followers of Simon Menno, born in 1505, and who died
in 1561. The distinctive tenets of the Mennonites are opposition to
infant baptism, to participation in government, and to war. Thus,
they met with determined opposition in Switzerland, not only from the
religious adherents of Zwingli and Calvin, but also from the Govern-
ment. A number were put to torture and imprisoned, and among
these was Hans Meily, of the Knownow district, in the Canton of
Zurich, who thus suffered about 1638. His sons, Hans Meily, Junior,
and Martin Meily, were imprisoned. This Martin Meily was a
Mennonite minister and an historian of the Mennonite sufferings. It
has been asserted that Martin Meily, who, as will be shown, came to
Pennsylvania in 1710, was a nephew of Martin Meilly, this Mennonite
historian; and, if this be true, the brother of Martin, the historian,
came here also. For Martin of Pennsylvania was accompanied by, or
followed by, his father, Hans Meily.
During the latter half of the Seventeenth Century and the early
years of the Eighteen Century, a number of Mennonite families set-
[501
A FOUNDER-FAMILY OF PENNSYLVANIA
tied in Holland and in the Palatinate, or German Rhine provinces,
these settlements being largely caused by Swiss edicts of banishment.
It was from these exiled Swiss Mennonites, as well as from their
German neighbors, and, in a far smaller degree, their Dutch neigh-
bors, that many Pennsylvania colonists originated. Some went first
to England, where they were generously aided by the Government,
which assisted them also to come to America. Among those who went
to England, apparently to arrange there for the transportation of a
party to America, were the leaders of what became the first settle-
ment of the present Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. These wrote
to their co-religionists in Amsterdam, Holland, where their letter, it
is said, still is extant. It was dated at London, June 27, 1710, and
stated that they were soon to embark for America. The signers of
this letter were Martin Oberholtzer, Martin Kundig, Christian Herr,
Jacob Muller, Martin Meili, and Hans Herr. It is believed that these
men, with others, arrived in Philadelphia in September, 1710, on the
ship, Mary Hope.
On October 10, 1710, a warrant for the survey of ten thousand
acres on Pequea Creek, then in Chester County, but now in Lancaster
County, Pennsylvania, was issued, and it was patented October 23,
1710, to Hans Herr and Martin Kundig, evidently acting as agents
for the little group of colonists. This tract was subdivided among the
following: Martin Kundig, Martin Meily, Christian Herr, Hans
Herr, Wendel Bowman, John Rudolph Bundely, Christopher Fran-
ciscus, Jacob Miller (or Muller), and John Funk.
While historians state that Hans Meily accompanied his sons,
Martin and Hans (John) to America, in 1710, it has been thought
that he did not do so, but died in Europe, perhaps in Switzerland, pos-
sibly in the Palatine, or elsewhere. He must have been very aged in
1710, for there is record that the wife of his son, Martin, was born in
1672, which indicates the approximate age of the said Martin. Mar-
tin was apparently the older of the two sons of the old Hans Meily,
since he took the more active part in the Pequea settlement, and since
he shared in the original division of the 1710 patent, as has been
stated. If John Meily, Senior, came to Pennsylvania, he probably
died soon thereafter. The name of his wife is unknown.
Martin Meily was probably twice married, and it may be that all
[51]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
of his children were born of the first marriage. For on the grave-
stone of his wife, Barbara, in what is called now the old Tchantz or
Musser graveyard (in West Lampeter Township, on Pequea Creek,
in Lancaster County), it is stated that she was aged seventy at her
death in 1742, and that she had lived in marriage with Martin Meily
for twenty-four years. Thus their marriage took place about 1718,
when she was forty-six years old.
Martin Meily made his will on March 17, 1747; added a codicil
on April 8, 1749; and it was proved January 22, 1750 (Old Style,
1749). In it he mentioned only one child, his son, Martin. But it is
apparently clear that Hans Meily, whose gravestone lies close to that
of Barbara (wife of Martin), was a son of Martin, by the latter's
first marriage. This Hans died December 26, 1733, aged nineteen
years, and thus was born prior to the marriage of Martin and Bar-
bara, which, as said, occurred in 1718.
From Martin Meily, Junior, son of Martin, the 1710 colonist, and
grandson of Hans Meily, Senior, probably a colonist of 1710,
descend the Meilys of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. The present
study, however, is especially concerned with the history of the Meily
family of Lebanon County, Pennsylvania. This branch descends
from John Meily, son of John (Hans) Meily, Senior, and thus brother
of Martin Meily, the Lancaster County Meily's ancestor.
John Meily, brother of Martin (ancestor of the Lancaster County
Meilys), appears, as has been said, to have been the younger of the
two sons of Hans Meily. Not only was Martin's part in the early
settlement far more conspicuous, but, in the aforesaid division made
to the nine grantees, of the original 1710 patent of ten thousand acres
(made to Hans Herr and Martin Kundig), these nine men are called
"Swissers;" whereas, in the grant (described subsequently herein) to
John Meily, in 1717, he is described as "late of the Palatinate of the
Rhine in Germany." The indications are that Hans, the father, and
his elder son, Martin, had been born in Switzerland; that they had
gone to the Palatinate, as did so many of the Swiss Mennonites ; that
Hans' younger son, Hans, Junior, or John, had been born in the Pala-
tinate; that all three had come to Pennsylvania in 1710; that Hans,
Senior, died very soon after the settlement on Pequea Creek, or, at
any rate, before 1717. In a deed, to be mentioned subsequently in
[52]
A FOUNDER- FAMILY OF PENNSYLVANIA
this present study, it is shown that, in 1730, there was living a John
Meily, who was called "eldest son & heir at law of Hans Meilin,
deceased," and that this "eldest son" had inherited the lands patented,
in 1717, to his father. Therefore, since it appears that John (son of
Hans, the 1710 colonist), was younger than his brother, Martin, the
patentee of 1717 could not have been the elder Hans; for, in that case,
the "eldest son" of the said 1730 deed would not have been John,
but Martin.
Martin Meily, son of Hans, Senior, was probably born prior to
1672 (the birth-date of his second wife, Barbara). Therefore, since
Martin's brother, John, was younger, in accordance with the theory
of evidence set forth above, John Meily, son of Hans, Senior, was
born probably after 1670, and in the Rhenish provinces of Germany,
called the Palatinate. In 1671 there was a conspicuous migration of
Swiss Mennonites to the Palatinate ; and that may have been the year
when the Meily family, Hans, his wife, and Martin, their son (prob-
ably a young child), settled en the Rhine, where, perhaps about 1672,
John Meily was born.
On August 30, 1717, there was patented to John Meily a tract
of seven hundred acres, located in what was then the Township of
Strasburg, Chester County, Pennsylvania. Lancaster County was
formed from Chester County in 1729. Warrant for survey of this
tract had been issued to John Meily earlier in the same year. It may
be that he had lived, up to that time, with his elder brother, Martin
Meily, on the latter's subdivision of the original 1710 patent, and
that the occasion of his (John's) activity in securing a tract for him-
self, as he did in 1717, was the death of his father, Hans Meily, the
aged 1710 colonist. This 1717 patent describes the land granted to
John Meily as follows :
" .... a certain tract of land situated in Township of Strasbury
[Strasburg] in County of Chester. . . .Beginning at a marked white
oak at a corner of Isaac Leffeires land and running by the same
north by west 245 perches to a corner post then by land reputed vacant,
west by south 485 perches to a corner black oak, then south by east by
vacant land, the land of Benedictus Vengrif t 245 perches to a corner
white oak then east by north by the lands of Martin Kendig, Martin
Mayley and Christian Herr 485 perches to the place of beginning,
[531
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
containing Seven hundred acres." The document goes on to state
that "Hans Mayley late of the Palatinate of the Rhine in Germany
but now of the Township of Strasbury" desires a confirmation by
patent of the grant of the described land.
On November 15, 1718, "Hans Meilen of the Township of Stras-
bury in the County of Chester" deeded to "Charles Christopher of
Strasbury" one hundred and six acres, described in the deed as being
part of the tract of seven hundred acres which the Commissioners of
Pennsylvania had granted to the said "Hans Meilen" on August 30,
1717. On July 27, 1722, "Hans Meylin" deeded one hundred acres of
the 1717 patent of seven hundred acres to Martin Meylin, perhaps
the Martin, brother of John (and son of Hans, Senior), but possibly
Martin, son of John Meily of the 1717 patent, who, as will be shown,
had a son, Martin. This tract of one hundred acres was deeded, by
Martin Meily, to Charles Christopher, July 21, 1747.
John Meily died before January 29, 1728 (1727, Old Style), for,
on that date, "John Mylen & Martin Mylen and Joseph Lowe all of
the County of Chester" were bound as sureties for the administration
of the estate of "John Mylen," deceased, by "the above bounded John
Mylen," whose signature to the bond is "Hans Miyli."
There is preserved in the Register's Office for Chester, dated
January 16, 1717-1728, "An Inventory of all and singular of the
goods and chattels of John Mylen late of Conastogo, deceased." In
this is listed, with cattle, farm implements, "severall Kettles and
potts," "some beding," "some books," etc., "the plantation 300 acres."
This was apparently what remained of the 1717 patent of seven hun-
dred acres (which may, of course, actually have consisted of less
land), from which tract he had, as stated, deeded away two hundred
and six acres.
The name of the wife of John Meily, son of Hans, Senior, and
brother of Martin, is unknown. He appears to have had five sons:
John, Martin, Jacob, Samuel, and George. These five had patents of
land in about the same locality, receiving them at dates close together.
Of these five, Jacob Meily is the ancestor in the lineage of the
present study ; but some account of the others will be given, before his
history is here recorded.
As has been said, John Meily was administrator of his father's
[54]
A FOUNDER-FAMILY OF PENNSYLVANIA
estate in 1728. On December 10, 1730, "John Mealin of the County
of Lancaster," "eldest son & heir at law of Hans Meilin, deceased, and
Katharine his wife" deeded to John Howser two hundred acres of
land, the instrument of grant stating that this tract was a part of that
which "William Penn. . . .by Patent. . . .under hands of his late Com-
missioners to wit Richard Hill, Isaac Norris and James Logan. . . .the
thirtieth day of August, Anno Domini one thousand seven hundred
and seventeen. . . .did grant. . . .unto the said Hans Meilin in his life
time .... in the Township of Strasburg now in the said County of
Lancaster, containing seven hundred acres. ..." The deed goes on
to state that the said "Hans Meilin .... Since died intestate seized
thereof" and is signed by John Meily and his wife, Katharine, as
grantors to the aforesaid John Howser.
On March 19, 1736-1737, "John Meiley of Lebanon Township
in the County of Lancaster yeoman & Catherine his wife" deeded to
Durst Thomas, also of Lebanon Township, three hundred and forty-
seven acres "on the head of Conestogoe Creek," the deed stating that
the land granted was the same patented to the said John Meily "the
seventeenth day of January past." This tract, thus patented on Janu-
ary 17, 1736-1737, was warranted for survey for John Meily on Octo-
ber 12, 1734. The land was partly bounded by "Philip Carpenters
Settlement" and "Thomas Croyls Settlement."
Martin Meily, apparently the brother of the preceding John of
Lebanon Township, and thence the son of John Meily, the 1717
patentee, (son of Hans Meily, the aged colonist of 1710), received,
May 17, 1734, a patent for land situated "near Mill Creek a branch of
Conestogoe by land of Hans Meilin." He is also listed twice as a war-
rantee of other land in Lebanon Township: June 7, 1738, for four
hundred acres; and March 28, 1745, for two hundred acres.
Martin Meily of Lebanon Township married Anna Sabina .
He made his will March 31, 1770, and it was proved November 7,
1770. It begins: "In the Name of God Amen I Martin Meylie Senior
of the Township of Lebanon in the County of Lancaster & Province
of Pennsylvania yeoman being weack in Body labouring under old age
& Infirmities but of sound and disposing mind, perfect memory and
understanding and considering that it is appointed for all men once to
die do make this my last will and Testament." He recommends his
[55]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
soul to God, and his body to the earth, provides for the payments of
any debts on his estate, and goes on to bequeath household goods, fur-
niture, etc., to "my beloved wife Anna Sabina." He then continues:
"and be it further made known herewith that whereas I have in my
Life time provided for my son George Meylie and Henry Meylie with
land far under the value of half price, as Land is now generally
valued & sold in the neighbourhood and among my other children Viz
Martin, Samuel, Sabina and Elizabeth voluntarily and Freely of my
own accord did divide and distribute my Bonds and Writings concern-
ing my Estate in four equal shares to each of the four Before named
the Sum of two Hundred Sixty eight pounds, Eighteen shillings and
six pence." The testator then arranges that his wife, Anna Sabina,
shall have the residue of the estate till her death, when it shall pass to
the testator's "Children, Martin, Samuel, Sabina, Elizabeth but
my Sons George and Henry are to have nothing of this said Remain-
der .... because .... they have been .... provided in Lands." He
appoints as executors of his will, his "Sons Martin Meylie and Samuel
Meylie."
An" interesting history could be compiled, from original docu-
ments, on the descendants of Martin and Anna Sabina Meily of
Lebanon County; but space for this is lacking in the present study,
which is especially concerned with the descendants of Jacob Meily,
brother of Martin (husband of Anna Sabina), as placed in this
lineage.
Samuel Meily, believed to have been a son of John, the 1717
patentee, received a warrant for three hundred acres, dated October
22, 1734. The conditions of the warrant not being fulfilled, the patent
was granted to Christian Meily, May 16, 1744.
George Meily, also believed a son of John, the 1717 patentee,
received a warrant for three hundred acres, dated March 8, 1734.
The direct ancestor, as stated, in the line here traced, Jacob Meily,
placed as son of John Meily (the 1717 patentee, born probably in
the German Rhine provinces, whence he came to America in 1710),
the latter being the son of Hans Meily, Senior (born in Switzerland,
but who probably lived in the German Rhine provinces, before coming
to America in 1710, with his sons, Martin and John).
It should be borne in mind that the present Lebanon County,
[56]
A FOUNDER- FAMILY OF PENNSYLVANIA
Pennsylvania, was a part of Chester County, Pennsylvania, in 1710,
when Hans Meily and his two sons, Martin and Hans (John) came
over with the little company of Swiss Mennonites who formed the
colony on Pequea Creek. In 1729, Lancaster County was formed
from a part of Chester County. The Lancaster County Townships of
Lebanon, Heidelberg, and Bethel were erected into the County of
Lebanon in 1813. Doctor Egle, in his history of Dauphin and
Lebanon Counties, writes: "It is not positively known when the first
settlements were made within the present limits of the county of
Lebanon. The earliest assessment extant of taxables which included
this county is that of Conestogoe Township, Chester County, for. . . .
1718. Among the names we recognize a number which a few years
after appear on the tax-list of Lebanon Township,. .. .especially
among the first warrantees of land." Again, in the history of Lan-
caster County, published in 1883 by Ellis and Evans, it is said of
Conestoga Township: "This township was formed as early as 1712,
and originally embraced a territory much greater .... than at the pres-
ent time." In the Conestoga Township Assessment List for 1718,
under "Dutch Inhabitants," "Martin Milan" and "John Milan"
appear. J. I. Mombert, D. D., in his history of Lancaster County,
published in 1869, describes the boundaries of Conestogoe Township,
in 1729, when Lancaster County was erected, as follows: "The
township of Conestogoe, beginning at the mouth of Pequea, thence up
Susquehanah, thence to said mouth of Conestogoe creek, thence up
the said creek to the mouth of Mill creek, then by a direct line to
Pequea at the mouth of Beaver creek, thence down Pequea to the place
of beginning." The statement is made in Volume 2 of the Lebanon
County Historical Society Papers and Addresses: "Lebanon county
holds two streams .... that may be said to be exclusively its own from
source to mouth. The one. . . .is the Mill Creek: the other the
Quittapahilla."
In the inventory, mentioned above, of the estate of John Meily
(son of Hans Meily, Senior, the 1710 colonist), the decedent is called
"John Mylen late of Conastogo, deceased." Some of the early Meily
patents (of those believed the sons of this John) refer to Mill Creek
in describing their lands, and, as has been shown, there is clear proof
that John Meily (eldest son of "John Mylen late of Conestogo,
[571
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
deceased) and Martin Meily also, lived in what was then Lebanon
Township. Thus, there is a chain of many links connecting the John
Meily of the 1717 patent (the same "John Mylen late of Conestogo,
deceased," and son of Hans Meily, the 1710 colonist), with the Meily
family which has borne so eminent a part in the history of Lebanon
County, Pennsylvania.
In May, 1739, Lebanon Township (then a part of Lancaster
County), was divided, and its northern part was named Bethel Town-
ship. It was in Bethel Township that Jacob Meily lived.
Jacob Meily is said to have been born in 1700 or before that date.
Thus, it is probable that he was born in the Palatinate, and brought
to Pennsylvania as a child, in 1710.
On February 19, 1734, a warrant for survey of two hundred
acres was issued to him. He did not fulfil the conditions of the war-
rant, however, perhaps not actually settling on the tract in a given
time), and the patent was granted to Hugh Thompson, April 20, 1749,
its extent then stated as two hundred and seventy-six acres, and
described as "a certain tract of land situated on Mill Creek, within
the County of Lancaster."
In 1735 Jacob Meily signed a petition, also signed by John and
Martin Meily (probably his brothers), which was submitted by
"sundry the Inhabitants of the Counties of Chester and Lancaster,"
and which petition "Humbly Showeth That your Petitioners being
seated for the most part at a great Distance from the City of Phila-
delphia in a part of the said Counties where no Public Road is as yet
established and having long laboured under many inconveniences
through the want of such a Road whereby they might have free access
to the Market to their very great loss and Detriment." They desired
that a road be laid out from John Harris' Ferry on the Susquehanna
River (the present Harrisburg), "to join with the Road lately con-
firmed from Lancaster town to Philadelphia near the now dwelling
Plantation of Edward Penn commonly known by name of Edward
Kennisons in the great Valley or thereabouts/ 1 etc. The Council
authorized the said road, January 23, 1736 (Old Style dating, 1735 ).
On June n, 1759, Jacob Meily of Bethel Township (now, as
stated, in Lebanon County, but then in Lancaster County), purchased,
for forty-nine pounds, four shillings, and three pence, from Peter
[58]
A FOUNDER-FAMILY OF PENNSYLVANIA
Wolf of Hanover Township, Lancaster County, a tract of about one
hundred and fifty acres.
He signed a Power of Attorney to his son-in-law, Isaac Groe, in
connection with indebtedness to Jacob Meily by Henry Miller, July 3,
1771, and on the 26th day of the same month he made his will, which
was proved August 27, 1771. This follows:
"In the name of God Amen, The 26th of July in the year of our Lord one thousand
seven hundred and seventy one, I Jacob Meily of Bethel Township in the County of Lan-
caster and Province of Pennsylvania, yeoman being a sound mind and memory and under-
standing and in perfect health, blessed be God, considering that all men are mortal and the
hour of death uncertain therefore I make and ordain this my last will and testament in
the following manner and form.
"First of all I give & bequeath to my beloved wife Ann out of my estate the sum of
twelve pounds & ten shillings of good and lawful money of said Province to be paid to
her or to my hereafter named Executor, yearly & every year during her natural life accord-
ing to a bond of performance given to me by Henry Miller dated the third day of July in
the year 1771 moreover my wife shall have of household goods as follows, my new bed-
stead and the curtains to it, and the best of my beds, and my chest and my little table and
half dozen pewter spoons and two pewter plates, a pewter beason and a pewter dish and
an iron pott and a iron pann & a copper leadle & an iron leadel & a pewter tankart and the
best tin quart tea kittle and a little pewter tea pott, and the tea cups and the smoothing iron
and the looking glass & spinning wheel and the big and little chairs and the big copper
kettle and all the yarn in the house woolen linen or cotten and also four sheep and a cow
air! twenty four pounds 'lawful money of the said Province to be paid her in one month
after my death. And all the above mentioned articles shall be put into the care and trust of
Isaac Groe to whom I will that my wife shall live with him after my decease and all the
above mentioned shall be to her proper use, benefit and behoof forever. And for the better
encouragement to my daughter Susanna and Isaac Groe my son-in-law to give my said
wife sufficient and decent maintainance during her natural life suitable to her age I will
and order that all the whole estate which my wife shall dye possessed of, that which is
willed and bequeathed to her by me shall descend unto my said daughter Susanna, but if
in case my said daughter should happen to dye before my said wife, then my wife shall have
free liberty and choice to remove to wheresoever she shall think proper with all her effects
which I have willed and bequeathd unto her.
nd as concerning my eldest Son Henry shall have but one shilling sterling or the
value thereof for his whole shear and portion out of my whole estate, if he will demand it,
and no more. And as my daughter-in-law Fronica, wife of my said son Henry, which he
left behind him, being married contrary to the statutes and laws of the land,* therefore it
is my will and I order it so that she shall be debarred of any right thereunto. And I will
and bequeath to my son Henry's four lawful children, Martin, Henry, Mary & Catharina a
single shear only instead of their father, to be divided equally Amongst the four for their
shear and no more.
"And I will and bequeath to my daughter Ann, the Sum of eight pounds lawful money
of the said Province, besides what she has received already to be paid to her in one year
after my decease. And I will and bequeath to my son Jacob, and Elizabeth my daughter
ami my daughter Susanna, & my daughter Barbara and my daughter Catharine, and my
chuK r hter Slagdalcna, they shall have all Equeal Sheare, one with another But my son
i) shall have the house clock according to the valuation of it for part of his shear.
'And as concerning my daughter Mary she shall have an Equal shear with the rest of
tlie above six children, and then it shall be divided amongst her children, every one an
This means merely, as will be shown, that his son, Henry, was married to the said Veronic* by a
Lutheran minister.
[591
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
Equal Shear. And likewise I constitute make and ordain my beloved son-in-law Isaac Groe
Executor of this my last will and Testament and to Execute this written will according to
the true intent and meaning of this my last will and testament.
"Witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand and Seal the day and year first
above written. Jacob Meily (Seal)"
The wife of Jacob Meily was Anna Cassell. Their children were :
i Henry Meily, of whom subsequently.
ii Elizabeth Meily; born November 18, 1723; died December I, 1773; married,
first, John Spitler, who was born September 24, 1718, and killed by Indians May
JO, J757, on which occasion she escaped, and fled to her father's home; mar-
ried, second, Adam Faber.
in Ann Meily.
iv Jacob Meily; perhaps the Jacob Meily of Bethel Township (now in Lebanon
County), where his father resided, whose wife was named Catherine; and
perhaps the Jacob Meily of Bethel who died in 1807, leaving children : Jacob,
Magdalena (who married Jacob Kettle), Martin, and Anna (who married
Abraham Seebolt* In the list of taxables for Bethel Township for 1782,
Jacob Meily is listed as having two mills and two hundred and sixty acres of
land. This was perhaps the Jacob Meily in 1783 Captain of the Third Com-
pany, Second Battalion, Lancaster County Militia, this Battalion being com-
posed of men from the Townships of Heidelberg, Lebanon, and part of Bethel.
v Susanna Meily ; wife of Isaac Groe, who was executor of the will of his father-
in-law, Jacob Meily.
vi Barbara Meily.
vn Catherine Meily.
vni Magdalena Meily.
ix Mary Meily, whose children were mentioned, though not named, in her father's
will, 1771.
Henry Meily was the eldest son of Jacob and Anna (Cassel)
Meily of Bethel Township, in the present Lebanon County, Pennsyl-
vania. He was born probably in 1721 or 1722, as his father, Jacob
Meily, was born about 1700, Henry was called in his father's will the
eldest son, and Henry's sister, Elizabeth, was described as the second
child and first daughter of Jacob Meily in the Hebron Moravian
church records. Jacob Meily, the father, and his children appear to
have left the Mennonite people and to have been connected with the
Moravian denomination.
Egle's history of the county places Jacob Meily, father of these children, otherwise.
[60]
A FOUNDER- FAMILY OF PENNSYLVANIA
In 1779 he was taxed for two hundred acres of land and for cat-
tle. In 1782 the tax-lists show that he was possessed then of two
hundred and fifty acres.
On July 31, 1743, he married Veronica Spider, the ceremony
being performed by the Reverend John Casper Stoever, first minister
of the Evangelical Lutheran Congregation, located about three miles
northwest of the town of Lebanon, known as the Hill Church and
erected in 1733. It was this marriage which Henry Meily's father,
Jacob Meily, as has been noted above in the stern wording of his will,
regarded as being "without the law," though, in the same document,
he was careful to refer to the children of that marriage as "my son
Henry's four lawful children."
Veronica Meily was baptized December 13, 1753, as recorded in
the Moravian Register of Hebron. Her family appears to have been
of Moravian religion, as was that of her husband, Henry Meily: but,
from some cause or circumstance of which no record has come down,
or been discovered, these two, at the time of their marriage, chose a
Lutheran ceremony. But, since the Veronica Meily of the 1753 bap-
tism appears to have been the wife of Henry Meily, she doubtless had,
by that date, returned to the denomination of her parents ; and prob-
ably her husband took the same step, although no definite record of
this has been located.
Her father was John Spitler of Bethel Township, whose will was
dated May 26, 1756, and proved June 12, 1758. His wife was named
Catherine, and he referred in his will to his son, Jacob Spitler, whom
he appointed his executor; to his "eldest son," John Spitler, (the John
Spitler mentioned above as husband of Henry Meily's sister, Eliza-
beth, and who was killed by Indians in 1757) ; to his "daughter Bar-
bara the wife of Jacob Hantschi;" and to his "daughter Veronica
Meile the wife of Henry Meile." He was born December 7, 1690, died
October 9, 1757, and was buried in the Moravian cemetery, about a
mile and a quarter from Lebanon (the borough), which ancient rest-
ing-place was laid out as early as 1748.
Henry Meily's wife, Veronica, died, according to family records,
before 1770. These records state that he married, second, January 3,
1770, Sarah (?) Zanders, and that he died in 1804.
The children of Henry and Veronica (Spitler) Meily were the
following :
[61]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
I Martin Meily; named in the will of his grandfather, Jacob Meily.
ii Henry Meily, of whom subsequently.
in Mary Meily; named in the will of her grandfather, Jacob Meily; probably
born about 1746, and the "Anna Maria, born Meilin now wife of Caspian
Kohrs," who was baptized January 18, 1765, aged nineteen, in the Bethel
Moravian Church.
iv Catherine Meily ; named in the will of her grandfather, Jacob Meily.
Henry Meily, son of Henry and Veronica (Spitler) Meily, was
born in 1748. At the age of seventeen, on March 20, 1765, he was
baptized, according to the Bethel Moravian church records, receiving
the name of Christian Henry. He does not seem, however, to have
used the name Christian, and will thus here be recorded as Henry
Meily.
In the will of his grandfather, Jacob Meily, in 1771, he is named
second among the children of Henry and Veronica Meily.
In 1782 he was listed as a taxable for fifty acres of land and for
cattle.
Henry Meily fought for American independence in the War of
the Revolution, serving as a Private in the First Company, Fifth Class,
of the Second Battalion of the Lancaster County Militia, 1782. Fam-
ily records state that he died in 1796.
His wife was Magdalena Kroh, and they were married, August
23, 1778, by the Reverend John Casper Stoever, the minister of the
Evangelical Lutheran church near Lebanon, who had performed the
marriage ceremony for Henry Meily's parents, Henry Meily, Senior,
and Veronica Spitler.
It has been thought that the maiden surname of Henry Meily's
wife was misspelled in the marriage record, and that she was Magda-
lena Kohr, daughter of Michael and Anna Margaretha Kohr, who
came to Pennsylvania in 1727. Michael Kohr took the required oath
of allegiance to the English government of Pennsylvania on Septem-
ber n, 1728. They settled in Bethel Township, now in Lebanon
County, and their children were as follows :
I George Casper Kohr; born October 7. 1724; came to Pennsylvania with his
parents at the age of three years ; was a farmer, miller, and blacksmith in the
present Lebanon County ; died May 28, 1801 ; in his will appointed, as one of
its executors, his brother-in-law, Henry Meily ; married Anna Maria Meily ;
had children: Christian, Casper, Michael, Ludwig, Jacob, John, Barbara.
Magdalena.
[62]
A FOUNDER-FAMILY OF PENNSYLVANIA
ii Michael Kohr; born September 29, 1732, at Bethel.
in Margaretha Kohr; married Daniel Born (eldest son of Ludwig and Anna
Maria Born), February 11, 1755.
iv A twin child, name and birthdate unknown.
v A twin child, name and birthdate unknown.
vi Magdalena Kohr, who, as stated, has been considered as identical with Magda-
lena Kroh, the wife of Henry Meily, Junior.
Henry and Magdalena (Kroh or Kohr) Meily doubtless had
other children, but the only one of record was John Meily. The fol-
lowing is the gist of statements made in November, 1919, by his
granddaughter.
"John Meily, son of Henry Meily, died ninety-three years ago,
when his grandson, John Meily (son of Martin), was but a tiny babe.
John Meily was not a member of any church, but some of his children
joined the Lutherans, and some the Reformed church, while others
were United Brethren. He was a farmer, and lived south of Frede-
ricksburg, in Lebanon County, where the house he occupied has only
recently been replaced by a modern structure. He married Barbara
Oberholtzer, the daughter of Martin Oberholtzer. John Meily and
his wife are both buried in the old Grove burying-ground. This is not
a church cemetery, but simply a place out in the country in which the
people in that locality buried. It is off the main road that runs from
Shirkstown and Fredericksburg and is near Grove's Mills, and is
accessible by private conveyance."
Since the marriage of John Meily's parents, Henry Meily -and
Veronica Spitler, took place, as stated above, August 23, 1778, it may
be assumed that John Meily was born about 1779.
About 1800, he was married to Barbara Oberholtzer.
It is thought that the Oberholtzer family originated in a village
of the name, in the Canton of Zurich, Switzerland. The names of
Martin and Jacob Oberholtzer appear as Swiss members of a Menno-
nite congregation in the Upper Palatinate. Possibly this Martin was
a son of Jacob, and may have been the same Martin Oberholtzer who
emigrated to Pennsylvania. The latter was born in 1709, in Ger-
many, thirty miles from Frankfort-on-the-Main. He died April 5,
1744, aged thirty-eight.
[63]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
The wife of Martin Oberholtzer, the Colonist, was Agnes
and they were married November 2, 1736. She was born April 18,
1713, and died February 15, 1786. Her husband died, aged thirty-
eight, April 5, 1744. Both were buried in the Mennonite cemetery at
Deep Run, in Bucks County, Pennsylvania.
The children of Martin and Agnes Oberholtzer were :
i Barbara Oberholtzer.
ii Henry Oberholtzer.
in Maria Oberholtzer.
rv John Oberholtzer.
v Martin Oberholtzer, of whom below.
Martin Oberholtzer of Bethel Township in the present Lebanon
County is believed to have been the son of the aforesaid Martin and
Agnes Oberholtzer, and, from comparison of names and dates, there
appears cause to accept this conclusion. Martin, son of Martin and
Agnes, is said to have died after 1815. The will of Martin of Bethel
Township was proved in 1815. Again, Martin, son of Martin and
Agnes, had children : Jacob, William, Agnes, Joseph, Mary, Elizabeth,
Magdalena, Abraham, Barbara, Anna, Sarah, Jacob. , Martin of
Bethel names in his will, as his children: Christian, Mary, Jacob,
Barbara, Anna. The wife of Martin, son of Martin and Agnes, was
Elizabeth Nash, born August 3, 1751. She was the daughter of
William Nash and his first wife. This William Nash was three times
married, and his last wife was Agnes, widow of Martin Oberholtzer,
the Colonist.
Martin Oberholtzer of Bethel Township made his will November
12, 1801, and it was proved May 5, 1815. In it he mentioned his
children : Christian, Mary, the wife of John Meyers, Jacob, "Barbara
now the wife of John Meily," and Anna. He also refers to "My son-
in-law John Meily," and makes his son, Christian Oberholtzer, execu-
tor of his will.
On November 12, 1801, Jacob Oberholtzer and his wife, Barbara,
sold to John Meily of Bethel Township a tract of one hundred and
sixty acres in Bethel Township. The history of this land was as fol-
lows: On July 21, 1773, it was patented to Martin Oberholtzer. On
[64]
A FOUNDER-FAMILY OF PENNSYLVANIA
August 13, 1800, the said Martin deeded it to his son, the aforesaid
Jacob Oberholtzer, and the latter, as stated, sold it to John Meily.
On January 12, 1822, John Meily and his wife, Barbara, in a
document noting that a milldam "upon certain streams of water
(called a branch of Swatara Creek) overflowed part of land of John
Meily," granted unto John Grove "liberty and privilege of raising the
water of said run."
John Meily died in 1826, ninety- three years ago from 1919,
according to the statement of his granddaughter mentioned above.
He made his will August 5, 1822, and it was proved October 16, 1826.
The following is an abstract of this document :
" This fifth August on Towsend Eight Hundred and Twenty two I John
Meily of Bethel Township Lebanon County Pennsylvania yeoman Sick and weak
Do make this My last will 1 Give my beloved Wife Barbara all my Estate
till My youngest child have arrived the ach of twenty one year and aftere, My Estate
Shall be sold and all the Money devidet My Children alick, And My wife Barbara
Shol hove the Intrest of the thirth Porte. .. .duremg life.... When My wife Shall Marry
againe My Estate Shall be Salt the Hous and Two Lots of Ground in Stumpstown
Bethel Township Lebanon County
My Son Martin Meily Shall Pay for and the factory Tools for the Porter Trate
three hunderd Pounds as fowlows. . . .One Hundert Pounds Shall Stand in the Hands
of My Son Martin Meily as a Shear of his Share and for the Other Two hunerd
Pounds the said Martin Meily Shall Give Bands Poble first. .. .april one Tousent
Eight hundred and Twenty fore and the Secont the First April one Towsent Eight
hundred Tweenty fine, and So on till the Tow hundred Pounds paid, an the Said Bands
Shall be given to My Herein name Gaurdain of My Minor Children and the many to
Poing My Debt my herejn Named Gardain over my Minor Children and My Execu-
tors Shall Consider to gether what is baste when My wife Barbara Gib haus if Shee
Dinck to Gib up before My yunkest Chil have Twenty one year 1 du Apind My
bcloed Brotherin Low Christian Oberholser My Soil Gairdoin ober My Miner Children and
Imbower him To Give Sefischent Deeds of all My Reall Estate to My Son Martin
Meily.... on The House and two Lots in Stumpstown and When my Plantation Shal be
Solt Shall Give deed to the Purcha....! do appoint My Beloved wife Borbara My
Duly Excutrx and My Son Martin Meily My Sail Excutors in the presents of
Jacob Bagner his
John Hantz John X Meily (Seal)
mark
As stated above, John Meily's will, which was evidently tran-
scribed or prepared for him by a clerk unfamiliar with the English
language, was proved October 16, 1826.
The children of John and Barbara (Oberholtzer) Meily were:
I Martin Meily, of whom subsequently.
ii Henry Meily; born February 9, 1806; married Hickinger; had children,
George, Henry, Richard, and Emma.
[65]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
in Samuel Meily; married Catherine Boyer; had children, John and George, the
latter of whom is a resident of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, and has a son,
Charles Meily, of Harrisburg.
iv Jacob Meily; said to have left home in his youth,
y A child, who died young; name unknown.
vi Christian Meily; married Seltzer; had children, Jacob, Israel, Uriah,
Cornelius, and Mary.
vn Elizabeth Meily; married Gettle.
vni "Polly" (Mary?) Meily; married Yegar.
ix Barbara Meily; married Fells.
Martin Meily, eldest son of John and Barbara (Oberholtzer)
Meily, was born in Bethel Township, the present Lebanon County,
Pennsylvania, September 30, 1801. He lived in a house, still standing
and well preserved (in 1919), at Mt. Nebo, a little way off the main
road to Jonestown. He was by occupation a farmer and a potter, and,
as noted above, received, through provision in his father's will, the
tools used by the latter also in the potter's trade.
About 1823, or soon after, Martin Meily removed to Mechanics-
burg, in Cumberland County; but afterwards returned to Lebanon
County, where he held eminent place in the community. For ten
years he served as Justice of the Peace, and was for three years a
Notary Public. He made a study of law relating to land titles, and
was thrice elected Surveyor of Lebanon County.
His high sense of duty and patriotic devotion are attested by his
enlistment for service in the Civil War at a period when he was a
middle-aged man. He was assigned to duty to preserve order at
Scranton, Pennsylvania.
Martin Meily died September n, 1883.
In June, 1823, at Jonestown, Lebanon County, he was married
to Mary Magdalena Groh. This was doubtless her baptismal name,
for she is recorded in documents as Magdalena, while her father, in
his will, as will be shown, refers to her as "Molly." She was the
daughter of the Reverend John Groh, a Mennonite minister of Frede-
ricksburg, Bethel Township, Lebanon County, and the latter's wife,
Barbara Smutz. John Groh died between February 13, 1849, tne date
[66]
A FOUNDER-FAMILY OF PENNSYLVANIA
of a codicil to his will (made July 20, 1847), an d April 30, 1850, when
the will was proved. This document follows:
" 1 John Groh Senior of Bethel Township Lebanon County Pennsylvania being
weak in Body and of sound mind memory and understanding but Considering this my last
Will my household Stuff and loose property shall be divided one equeal share
to my son John one.... to my son Abraham one to my son Jacob one to my son
Samuel one to the Children of my son Isaac deceased one to my Daughter Barbara
the Wife of Daniel Wenner one to my Daughter Molly the wife of Martin Meily one
to my Daughter Catharine the wife of Jacob Hunsickcr One to the children of my
Daughter Mary late the Wife of George Miller one to my Daughter Elisabeth & one
to my daughter Susanna the wife of George Light My Son Abraham is to have Mill
and plantation which I sold to him containing about one hundred and fifty eight Acres
also Wood land Containing About one hundred and Seventeen acres Situate both
in Bethel Township Berks County Pa on Condition, Two thousand dollars said Son
Abraham may have for A legacy the Residue. .. .to be paid to my Executors
then the Deeds for the said Mill and Land to my said Son Abraham Groh 1 give
my Daughter Molly the Wife of Martin Meily all the use and possession of three
tracts two of them which I. .. .purchased of Jacob Pinkeypill one contains twenty
acres & twenty four and the other Containing ten Acres and Sixteen perches and the
other which I. .. .purchased of William Reider Containing twenty Acres and one hundred
and fifty four perches the said three tracts in East Hanover Township Lebanon County
to my said daughter Molly for her life time and after her death my
Executors shall sell.... the tracts and divide. .. .the Monies arising amongst all
the Children of my said Daughter Molly Whereas I have.... sold to my son John Groh
Land and two thousand dollars of the purchase Money 1 did give to him as a
legacy and whereas I sold unto my Son Jacob Groh land and two thousand Dol-
'lars of the purchase money I did give to him as a legacy and whereas I
sold to my Son Isaac Groh now deceased. . . .Land and two thousand dollars of the purchase
mpney did give to him as a legacy which shall be Charged against my said Son
Isaac Groh his children as a legacy and whereas I sold unto my Son Samuel Groh
land and two thousand dollars. . . .1 did give to him as a legacy. . . .and whereas I did
heretofore give to my Daughter Barbara One thousand dollars for A Legacy Item
it is my Will that my Daughter Elisabeth shall have my plantation Adjoining lands of
John Gring Jacob Groh the heir of John Grove deceased and others. .. .during her lifetime
or as long as single said plantation situate in Bethel Township Lebanon County and
State aforesaid and Elizabeth shall live in the half part of the House of the said
Jacob Groh my Executor shall Collect Bonds notes Money and divide
the same to my son John my Son Abraham. .. .my son Jacob my Son Samuel
the children of my said Daughter Molly the Children of my son Isaac deceased and
the Children of my daughter Mary late the Wife of George Miller and my said Daughter
Elisabeth Shall draw nothing 1 do Appoint My Said Son Abraham Groh of Bethel
Township Berks County Pennsylvania and George Light the husband of my said Daugh-
ter Susanna. .. .Executors the twentyeth July one thousand eight hundred and
forty seven.
in the presence John Groh (seal)"
of us
Jacob Groh
Jacob Shnotterly
The signature of the will is written in German script, and is fol-
lowed by a codicil in which the testator withdraws from his legacy
[67]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
to his daughter, Molly, one of the three tracts bequeathed to her in the
will, that described as containing twenty acres and one hundred and
fifty- four perches. This codicil is dated February 13, 1849, an d the
probate of the will and codicil was April 30, 1850.
From the foregoing document the children of John and Barbara
(Smutz) Groh may be listed as follows:
i John Groh.
ii Abraham Groh.
in Jacob Groh.
iv Samuel Groh.
v Isaac Groh; died before February 13, 1849 (the date of his father's will), leav-
ing children.
vi Barbara Groh; married Daniel Wenner.
vii "Molly" (Magdalena, and probably christened Mary Magdalena) ; the wife of
Martin Meily.
vm Catherine Groh ; married Jacob Hunsicker.
ix Mary Groh; married George Miller; apparently the latter's widow in 1849,
when her father made his will.
x Elizabeth Groh ; unmarried in 1849.
xi Susanna Groh ; married George Light.
A daughter of Martin and Magdalena (Groh) Meily, and hence
a granddaughter of the aforesaid John Groh, stated in 1919 that John
Groh and his wife had, besides the children above listed, two other
children, who died young, one of these twin to Catharine, mentioned
eighth in John Groh's will.
Magdalena (Groh) Meily, wife of Martin Meily, and daughter
of John and Barbara (Smuts) Groh, was born October 14, 1798. She
died March 22, 1883. Her will, dated January 22, 1879, an d proved
March 31, 1883, describes the testatrix as "I Magdalena Meily wife of
Martin Meily of East Hanover Township .... County of Lebanon and
State of Pennsylvania." She directed therein that her "body be
decently interred in the cemetery at or near Groves Mill in Bethel
Township." Her husband, Martin Meily, and her son, John Meily,
were appointed executors, and the will provided for the sale of her
[68]
A FOUNDER-FAMILY OF PENNSYLVANIA
real estate, "within one year after my death and the death of my hus-
band Martin Meily," the proceeds to be divided between her children
and grandchildren, named as follows: "My Son John Meily. . . .my
Second Son Jacob Meily. . . .if he be dead then to his children. . . .the
children of my daughter Elizabeth, deceased, who had been intermar-
ried with Abraham Moyer .... my daughter Mary now intermarried
with Milton Cooper. . . .My daughter Susan now intermarried with
Solomon Hoke . . . . "
Her husband, Martin Meily, did not long survive her. He died
September 15, 1883.
The children of Martin and Magdalena (Groh) Meily were:
i Benjamin Meily; born in 1824; fought in the Mexican War; was buried at
Mt. Nebo, Pennsylvania.
II The Honorable John Meily, of whom subsequently.
in The Honorable Jacob Meily; born April 22, 1828; a soldier, and wounded, in
the Civil War; a member of the Pennsylvania Legislature; was buried at
Mt. Nebo, Pennsylvania.
iv Elizabeth Meily, who was first named Barbara, as recorded in her father's
family Bible; born March 18, 1830; married Abraham Moyer, March 18, 1852.
v Maria Meily (called Mary) : born April 6, 1834; married Milton Cooper; was
buried at Mt. Nebo, Pennsylvania.
vi Susanna Meily (called Susan); born in June, 1838; married, 1857, Solomon
Hoke, who died in September, 191 1 ; had three children, James, Joseph, and
Mary Hoke ; living, 1919, at Mt. Nebo, Pennsylvania.
The Honorable John Meily, son of Martin and Magdalena (Groh)
Meily, was born at Mechanicsburg, Cumberland County, Pennsyl-
vania, his parents, as has been mentioned above, having gone there
soon after their marriage in 1823, though they later returned to
Lebanon County to reside. He was born on June 9, 1826, and was
his parents' second child, as recorded in their family Bible.
He was a member of the Pennsylvania Legislature, was active in
many business enterprises in Lebanon County, and held a place of
eminence and esteem in the community. He was a member of the
Reformed Church at Lebanon, in which city he resided. He died on
April 3, 1902.
Mr. Meily was twice married. His first wife was Miss Helen
Halter, who died February 25, 1873. He married, second, Miss
Katherine De Hof f, who survived him.
[69]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
The children of The Honorable John and Helen (Halter) Meily
were:
i James Meily.
ii John Meily.
in Helen Meily.
iv Mary Meily.
It may clarify some of the descriptions of Meily lands and resi-
dences mentioned in the foregoing study, to note the following.
The original Pennsylvania Counties were three, Philadelphia,
Bucks, and Chester. In 1729 Lancaster County was formed from
part of Chester. In 1875 Dauphin County was formed from part of
Lancaster. In 1813 Lebanon County was formed from Dauphin and
Lancaster Counties.
The Meily colonists, Hans Meily and his two sons, Martin and
John, lived in what is now Lancaster County, settling first on Pequea
Creek, in 1710. Hans, the father, evidently died soon after coming
to Pennsylvania. Martin, the elder of his sons, born in Switzerland,
as was his father, lived and died in the present Lancaster County.
His descendants lived there during the early generations and many
are still in Lancaster County.
John Meily, brother of Martin, and son of Hans, was probably
born during his father's residence in the German Palatinate. He
received a patent of land in the present Lancaster County, in 1717.
So far as it has been possible to learn, all of his sons settled in what is
now Lebanon County, but what was at the time Lancaster County,
and later was Dauphin County.
Jacob Meily, placed as son of this John (son of Hans, the aged
colonist), lived in Bethel Township, now in Lebanon County, which
was then in Lancaster County, and later was in Dauphin County.
Henry Meily (who married Veronica Spitler), son of Jacob Meily,
lived also in Bethel Township, the present Lebanon County. Henry
Meily, Junior (who married Magdalena Kroh, or Kohr), son of
Henry Meily, Senior, lived in the same locality, Bethel Township.
John Meily (who married Barbara Oberholtzer), son of Henry Meily,
Junior, lived near Fredericksburg, Bethel Township, Lebanon County.
[70]
A FOUNDER- FAMILY OF PENNSYLVANIA
Fredericksburg was founded in 1754, by Frederick Stump, whose
father, Christopher Stump, had settled on the site. Its founder named
the place Stumpstown, but it was later called Fredericksburg. Mar-
tin Meily (who married Magdalena Groh), son of John Meily, lived
at Mt. Nebo (the Post-Office, called Ono), near Jonestown, East
Hanover Township, Lebanon County. The Honorable John Meily,
son of Martin Meily, lived in the city of Lebanon, Lebanon County,
Pennsylvania.
The trail of the Meily lineage thus has led through more than
two hundred years : from Switzerland to the German Rhine provinces,
called the Palatinate ; thence to Pennsylvania, where the land on which
the family here traced lived was, first, in the present Lancaster
County, and finally in the present Lebanon County. The Meilys may
accurately be described as "A Founder-Family of Pennsylvania," for
they were among the earliest colonists of Lancaster County, that
great Ancestor-County from which sprang so many of the later
Counties of the Province and State. They have held eminent place
in their several communities from the date of their coming in 1710,
and have been esteemed as men and women of high character, civic
excellence, and Christian faith.
PORTRAIT OF MARK TWAIN
[72]
I.IKt'TKNANT T. S. (1UANT AND LIEUTENANT ALEXANDER HAYS IN 1845.
WHEN THEY WERE STARTING FOR THE MEXICAN WAR
The original picture, owned by Mrs. Agnes M. Hays Gormly. was taken at Camp
Salubrity. Louisiana, in 1846. Bealde Grant (the figure In the background) is his
racing pony. Dandy, and beside Lieutenant Hays is his pony. Sunshine. The
two men had been fellow-cadets at West Point, and served in the same regiment
in the Mexican War. Afterward Hays, like Grant, retired from the Army to
re-enter It at the breaking out of the Civil War as a colonel of volunteers. He
became a brigadier-general and was killed In the Battle of the Wilderness.
Reproduced through the courtesy of the MacMlllan Company, from Hamlln Gar-
land's, "Ulysses S. Grant, His Life and Character." page 66.
[73]
HIRAM ULYSSES, LATER KNOWN AS ULYSSES SIMPSON GRAXT
From a photograph by Fredericks, taken at the age of sixty. In 1882. Reproduced through the
courtesy of the MacMIllan Company, from Hamlin Garland's "Ulysses S. Grant, His Life and
Character." A very Interesting work of 624 pages.
"The news was flashed round the world that General Grant was attacked by cancer, and
was fighting his last battle. The Nation awoke to sympathy. All criticism of the great General
was for the time laid aside, and the Christian public offered daily prayers for his recovery. But
the General grew daily weaker. He could not sleep without morphia, and yet he fought against
Its use. He feared becoming a victim to Its power, and endured to the utmost the agonies of
sleeplessness before asking for relief. He was the most docile of patients. 'You are in command
here,' he would say to Doctor Shrady.
"In order to take even liquid food he was forced to fling the contents of the bowl down his
throat at one gulp, before the spasm closed his throat. It required his utmost resolution to do
this. It was terrible to see his effort. And yet he seldom uttered a word of complaint. He
never forgot to be courteous and mindful of others. He obeyed his nurses like a child, at the
same time that his great brain pondered upon questions national In scope." Garland's "Ulysses
S. Grant, His Life and Character," pages 509-10.
[76]
VOLUME XIV
NINETEEN TWENTY
NUMBER 2
SECOND QUARTER
IJnro (grant attfc
ItphitttatH
amuoing pi0odro at r&r embdosp Ball toe prince ^rt^ur, ?uKr ot
Connaugfyt, in tijc Cclasijington of te feittiro
BY
MRS. BENJAMIN SILLIMAN CHURCH
\ ice-President of the National Historical Society
T WAS early in the first presidential term of General
Grant when Prince Arthur, Duke of Connaught and
son of Queen Victoria, visited this country. Before
his arrival in Washington invitations had been issued
for a ball to be given him by the English Ambassador,
Sir Edward Thornton, with Lady Thornton, which
festivity was to usher in many others. The embassy was not large
enough for all the officials and residents that had to be asked, so the
ball was to take place in the great hall of a building which had been
dally fitted up for such occasions.
[77]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
We were invited for nine o'clock and word was given "that it
meant nine" and that under no circumstances were we to be late, for
it was "de rigeur" to be there before His Royal Highness arrived.
This gentle reminder came from the lesser attaches of the legations
and was opportune, although there were many who knew court
etiquette, despite the belief that Americans were an untutored lot.
I was one of the "younger set" in that far-off time, and well do
I remember our eager interest in the new gowns we were to have and
the discussions as to who would probably dance with the Prince. But
the moment arrived. We were on our way, and soOn in the line of
carriages, waiting our turn to alight. The Prince was already beside
Lady Thornton, near the door of the ball room, at the head of the
stairway up which we passed to be presented. A stream of people
were pouring in. The official world did well and, with the army and
navy, were on time. It was a brilliant array diplomats in full regalia
and blazing with decorations, along with our most distinguished offi-
cers, Admirals Farragut and Porter, Generals Sherman and Sheri-
dan, cabinet ministers and justices of the Supreme Court, and many
others who figured in the history of that notable period.
We remained not far from Lady Thornton, watching people enter
the room. It was amusing to notice how awkward some were, with
little nods and sidelong movements which one frequently sees on
similar occasions at the present day, for none are taught now how to
enter and leave a room. "Manners" are no longer a part of education.
However, the low courtesy and finished bow predominated and
bespoke the standards of European life. Finally every one appeared
to have arrived, and all were standing about rather inanely, I thought.
It had been pleasant to see so many one knew amid this host of
strangers, and I had not noticed how the time was passing. The naval
attache of the English legation was talking to me, but he seemed
curiously distrait and unlike the cheery, delightful spirit that had made
him so great a favorite in Washington. Stopping short in something
I was about to say, I became aware he was no longer Captain Ward.
His eyes were flashing and he was gazing up and down the length
of the room, then off to the stairway and entrance hall, to the wide
door where stood Lady Thornton, the Prince with his suite back of
him, Sir Edward and the other dignitaries back of him. The Prince
[78]
HOW GRANT AND SHERMAN SHOCKED THE DIPLOMATS
was as impassive as a wax figure. Lady Thornton looked strained
and was evidently doing her best to entertain him. Then I noticed
how people remained standing quietly, with little movement, while
there was no music.
At last I perceived that things were going amiss. Captain Ward
looked more "dour" than ever, and was now pulling his mustache, a
somewhat formidable one, first on one side and then on the other. To
my amazement I saw other men doing the same. In response to an
exclamation, "What is the matter!" "Why!" he said, "you do not
realize what the hour is! Nearly half-past ten o'clock!" tragi-
cally uttered with a pause between each word. I am sure he was
swearing inwardly, this exact man of times and seasons and the sacred
obligations of punctuality. But I understood : the President and Mrs.
Grant were an hour and a half late.
I felt scared, as if some national calamity had happened. But
what nonsense! I rebelled and exclaimed, "Perhaps no one told them
about being here at nine o'clock. Many did not know until today."
But that I should try to extenuate was too much. The irate captain
went off to condole with Sir Edward. Voices seemed to grow hushed
and a sense of depression began to dampen even my young heart.
Again I looked at the fixed but somewhat stony smile upon the
usually amiable countenance of our hostess, and though the Prince
retained immaculate composure I saw him glance more frequently at
the stairway.
Just then a charming old diplomat came up. He was "dean" of
the corps, the minister from Denmark. General de Raaslof, who was
for years in this country, beloved and respected by everyone. He
fairly bubbled with suppressed but decorous merriment when I asked
him, "What is the use of keeping everything back why not dispense
with part of the program?"
"Ah, my fair young American, how the free spirit of your land
cuts the Gordian knot that our old-world ways have fastened upon us !
It is near eleven o'clock, but all must wait for the great General and
Madame. I think they will soon be here. He has not understood."
The judgment was generous and reasonable, and I felt comforted,
especially as at that moment we caught sight of a broad white fore-
head, with waving hair, and the square shoulders of General Grant,
[79]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
leisurely ascending the stairs, with Mrs. Grant at his side. They came
forward like two innocent children, quite unconscious, with no word
of apology. She always leaned upon him with unquestioning devotion,
so simple and unaffected that one could not but feel the genial atmo-
sphere of a sweet and womanly nature. Quite alone, crossing the
intervening space, all eyes upon them, they approached Lady Thornton
and the Prince with direct and democratic bearing no bow, heads
erect, with only a little bend as they took the Prince's outstretched
hand.
Immediately the music burst forth into a veritable triumphant
march; faces cleared or broke into smiles. People fell back, leaving
a broad aisle to the upper end of the room, where a high dais had been
erected with draped flags and gilded chairs for the official dignitaries
and his Royal Highness. The Prince offered his arm to Mrs. Grant,
and the arm of General Grant was taken by Lady Thornton. The
Secretary of State, Mr. Hamilton Fish, was assigned to the beautiful
Mrs. Governor Sprague of Rhode Island, daughter of the Chief Jus-
tice, Salmon P. Chase, who gave his arm to Mrs. Hamilton Fish.
They passed along in stately fashion, and imposing array, until, near
the dais, a court quadrille was formed, which they proceeded to dance
with exceeding difficulty and many wanderings afield. The assem-
blage looked on, much entertained, enjoying their efforts to acquit
themselves creditably. But for the ready wit of Mrs. Sprague, her
youthful knowledge of how a quadrille should go, and her matchless
skill in steering things generally, I fear the distinguished dignitaries
would have made a hopeless mess of it.
Prince Arthur twice broke into an irresistable smile and looked as
if he longed to set General Grant right, but he had been too well
brought up to assume any such initiative. Secretary Fish always
turned the wrong way, but somehow was rescued just at the crucial
moment. However, they went through it beautifully and seemed to
enjoy the unwonted pastime, though evidently relieved when seated
comfortably on the dais and the general dancing began.
Just before the cotillion, as the last square dance of the evening
was forming, I found myself standing beside Admiral Farragut for
my partner. He had seized my hand and led me forward in his gay
animated way. "Come, you are to dance this set with me. General
[80]
1IOW (iRAXT AND SHERMAN SHOCKED THE DIPLOMATS
Sherman is to be our vis-a-vis, with Miss Lee," naming one of my
girl friends. Soon they stood opposite. Then came rollicking General
I'liil Sheridan, with another young girl, and then Admiral Porter
"Dave Porter," as they called him, with still another to complete the
set. Then began altogether the most charming, memorable dance of
my life. These heroes were all "in a gale," and the girls were quick to
catch the cantagion. How often have I recalled it with delight.
Admiral Farragut was noted, as his son Mr. Loyd Farragut is now,
for marvelous agility and accomplishment in dancing and knowledge
of all manner of wonderful steps. Every now and then he would
spring from the floor, carried away by the mere impulse of rythmical
movement ; then his feet would flash to and fro and twitter in the air
with inconceivable rapidity, in alighting, only to bound up again.
Some man standing near cried out, "Brava, Admiral ! That is
the best pigeon wing I ever saw !" The Admiral laughed back, "Oh,
that's nothing a mere preliminary ! You know it wouldn't do to let
go here. It would shock the Prince and my Lady Thornton." He
scowled at the thought, and then we all laughed. Little cared we for
shocking any one. We were all in the air buoyant and uplifted with
youth and happiness.
General Sheridan was a bit rough and almost whirled the girls
off their feet, when it came to "swinging corners." It was part of the
life and jollity and exuberant enjoyment which possessed us all. It
seemed to open up an inner vision of these men of fame. Their larger
atmosphere enveloped us. They were so hearty and so whole-souled, so
self-unconscious, strong, simple and spontaneous. How natural are
great deeds to such men ! The dance became almost a romp, but the
music ceased and it was ended. General Sherman called over, "Well
Admiral, you have distinguished yourself in other lines than naval
warfare tonight! I haven't had such fun since I was a boy." They
were all beaming and breathless.
The sets were now broken and people were walking about or
gathered in groups, the floor rather crowded. Suddenly I heard the
clear rough tones of General Sherman. He was standing not very far
off, talking with some men. 'I don't know ; I'll ask him," he exclaimed.
Turning, he made straight for the Prince, who was halfway across the
room with Miss Lee, one of our beautiful girls the third generation
[81]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
of "Mary Lee's" who since Revolutionary days had been well known
belles and beauties in Washington society. They were making their
way toward the dais. The tall figure of General Sherman strode after
them, coming up from behind. He raised his hand and down it came
in emphatic fashion on the Royal Scion, as the General called out,
"Prince!"
The startled, amazed look, the questioning, dumbfounded expres-
sion of Prince Arthur is beyond the power of words. Probably never
before had he so vividly experienced the realism of the land of
Democracy. But a volly of friendly questions soon involved him in
dates and engagements, and the General smilingly retracted his steps
and rejoined his party.
After the ball Miss Lee told me that Prince Arthur had said to
her, "Will you not come with me on the dais? I am very tired and
cannot sit down anywhere else." He had had a busy day. After he
had described to her the places he had visited, she asked, "Among all
the things you have seen, what has interested you most?" He did not
reply at once, but sat thinking, as if the son of Queen Victoria had
been too well brought up to decline seriously and conscientiously to
answer questions. He looked up at the ceiling for a moment and then
said, "What interested me most? General Sherman's sword!"
Already the chairs were placed around the room for the cotillion.
Many were already, and others were rapidly, being appropriated. I
suddenly remembered that I had no partner. Never mind; the last
dance had been enough; and I was about to find refuge among the
dowagers, when the deep friendly voice of Mr. Fane, one of the
English legation, called to me. Fane was a dear angel on all occasions,
such a kind heart, so thoughtful and ready to do a good turn. That
night he seemed ubiquitous. Every one was looked after. If he saw
two people, evidently strangers, he would go up to them with his pleas-
ant voice and accent : "How do you do ? Ah, you have forgotten me ?"
Of course he did not in the least know them, but that was of no con-
sequence. "I am one of the floor committee tonight. Let me intro-
duce you to - ' here a smothered dropping of the voice, no
name audible. "You surely ought to know each other. Won't you
dance this set? Oh, I see it is nearly over ! Well another begins soon.
Do come with me ; I will find you a place." The two strangers were
[82]
HOW GRANT AND SHERMAN SHOCKED THE DIPLOMATS
soon in animated discussion, and off Fane would flit to minister
elsewhere.
He said to me in his hasty way, "I want to introduce to you one
of the Prince's suite, who has no partner for the cotillion. Permit me
to present Lord Elfinstone." Thereupon a lovely-looking young man
was asking if he might hope for the pleasure of dancing with me ; and
it was a very happy and relieved girl who gave consent. Lord Elfin-
stone was Prince Arthur's special chum. These royal highnesses
always have some particular friend, and the two did not look unlike.
After awhile Mr. Fane came back and said, "You must have a
turn with the Prince," and later I was led forward. He now seemed
quite like other young men, and presently I was being whirled and
whirled, all one way, and so rapidly around the great ball room that it
was difficult to keep pace. Evidently royal scions were not taught to
"reverse" as our own men did. He made the extreme circumference
and we spun at a furious rate. It seemed as if we were traversing
miles ; but there sat the young laird, guarding our places, and at length
I was deposited beside him. The Prince actually smiled as he bowed
and said, "Thank you ; very delighted !" I made my best courtesy, and
he bowed again and was gone. He did not seem pleased by those rapid
evolutions, and soon I was talking to my partner about England and
America and their journeyings in our "wonderful country."
The officers and older people were gone, save the array of
mothers and chaperones who always patiently abided to the end.
They were very ornamental and looked imposing in their velvets and
laces, their diamonds and the plumes that waved on their heads. In
those days it was not the fashion for young girls ever to wear heavy
fabrics or many jewels; and as for feathers in the hair impossible.
That belonged to gray-haired matrons.
The dais was now filled with young people even the steps were
crowded. But the night was wearing on. The chaperones were gath-
ering their charges. "Just one more turn before you go," the young
laird said, and I was more than willing. We are young but once
that joyous season that finds the world so full of sunshine.
As we recall the scene and remember how many of that brilliant
throng have passed into the unknown realm, every gentle, gracious act
of the evening seems invested with living qualities. They linger per-
[831
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
sistently in the memory, suggesting tender thoughts of those vanished
ones, and it is a question whether such courtesies on social occasions
do not deserve to rank among the highest philanthropies of life. If it
is true, as some claim, that "thoughts are things," surely these winged
memories, born of kindly consideration for others, are imperishable,
and must continually react beneficially, making the charm of the high
art of human intercourse.
WAR VESSELS AT ANCHOR IN THE HUDSON RIVER
Drawn In October. 1912. when one hundred and two war vessels of the United State* Navy
anchor in the historic Hudson off New Tork City.
[85]
THB MAYFLOWER PASSING THE UNITED STATES WARSHIPS IN HUDSON'S RITHB.
OFF NEW YORK, OCTOBER. 1911
[86]
aahlrts ahat aalk
fetorp of tf)f j?iffb,ttnff Dap0 ot 77 OIU bp tljr 'Combstonre
of Old Be nmngton, Vermont
BT
DAVID C. GALE
[FEW YEARS prior to the outbreak of the Revolution,
a man by the name of Samuel Robinson, Captain in
the English Army, set out with his soldiers on the
trail which led from the shores of Lake George to the
somewhat more civilized wilds of Massachusetts. He
had served with the King's forces during the French
War, and was then on the way home. Had he kept to the trail, there
would now be nothing to write, but, as was quite excusable in those
days when there were no signs at the cross roads, he lost his way. In
short, he mistook the Walloomsac River for the Hoosick, and when
he came to strike camp his fires were bedded on the very soil that was
later molded into the streets of Old Bennington.
No sooner had Robinson driven his stakes and taken time to look
about him, than he decided that the Walloomsac Valley was every bit
as good if not better than any of the open sections of New England.
So he lost no time in applying to the Colonial Governor of New
Hampshire, Benning Wentworth, for the township charter which in
due season was turned over to him. As a token of appreciation as well
as a matter of diplomacy, for governors, then as now, were not
unmindful of the little niceties that tend to brighten official life, Rob-
inson named his new town Bennington.
All this and more is set forth on a plain, marble tablet just within
the gates of the Old Bennington cemetery. It tells how other settlers
found their way into the valley, and how Captain Robinson became
one of those masterful leaders, under whose direction the Grants
fought their way upward to a position of security and permanency.
[87]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
It was while he was in London, pleading the cause of the settlers
hefore the Crown, that the sturdy old warrior received his summons
from the Great Beyond ; and that is how it happens that his bones rest
in an English churchyard, far away from the land where the adven-
turous chapters of his life were unfolded.
Only the other day the good people of Bennington re-enacted
some of the impressive scenes in the town's history, taking as their
stage one of those forest-banked amphitheaters which may be found
almost anywhere in the Green Mountain state. The spectators who
gathered there saw the first settlers arrive and the coach of Governor
Wentworth roll by; and then the departure of Samuel Robinson for
England to present his message of warning from an aggrieved people ;
and after that the Council Room of Catamount Tavern and the riding
away of Ethan Allen's men a little rescue party which aimed to
punish the New York officials for arresting Remember Baker. They
beheld also an animated picture of the battle for which the modest
hamlet is best known to the outside world on the one side the "Ben-
nington Mob" as the Green Mountain Boys were dubbed in royal
circles, on the other side Captain Baum's Redcoats and Indians, all
thrown together under the realistic glare of red fire and the persistent
popping of make-believe musketry.
Such pageantry is entirely commendable and nothing should be
said or done which in ever so slight a degree may rob the promoters
of their just credit. There is always the danger that the generations
which now occupy the foreground may come to see only the glamour
and romance of the earlier periods, and think very little of the danger,
the hardship and the uncertainty w r hich so often clouded the skies of
the first settlers. But there is no need for the Bennington resident to
wait for the pageant to get an inspirational view of the past. Let him
step inside the quaint village churchyard and digest some of the
inscriptions he finds there and he will have as complete a panorama
as anyone might wish to see.
There in one corner almost hidden by an unrestrained hedge is
carved the name of Bennington's "first pastor who after a laborious
life in the Gospel ministry, resigned his office in God's temple for the
sublime employment of immortality, December 21, 1778." The
language is rather stilted it is true but the life story is there if one is
[88]
TABLETS THAT TALK
willing to look for it. Consider for a moment the lot of that back-
woods preacher! It could hardly have been other than laborious.
And with the labor must have been mixed a liberal amount of peril.
Across the driveway is a long flat slab which bears the name of
the landlord of Catamount Tavern. It lies only a few rods from the
site of that once famous hostelry where gathered so many of the
King's arch enemies. It presents no eulogy. It simply avers that the
passing of the valorous inn-keeper took place on the morning of May
17, 1781. No other word is needed. The name itself is enough to
conjure from the past a long train of heroic figures.
Farther down towards the centre is a long brick box, cut low on
one side so that the marble slab which covers it may catch the full
light of the setting sun. Thereon is preserved the name and achieve-
ments of "Anthony Haswell, a patriot of the Revolution. Printer
and Founder of the Vermont Gazette, 1783. A sufferer in the cause
of freedom under the Sedition Act of 1798." It was this man Haswell
who brought into Bennington the historic Daye press, a printing
machine which had already gained renown as the oldest press in the
country. Under his direction, it attained further distinction, sending
forth from week to week the cramped, labor-marked forms of the
Gazette, Vermont's first newspaper. Who can say that Haswell and
his paper may not have been the magnet which drew William Lloyd
Garrison to Bennington? The older man had been gone but a few
years when Garrison took up his work there and, from the drudgery
and limitations of that unpretentious newspaper office, he emerged
as from a training school to take up the larger career that was to be
his portion.
A bronze-paneled marker in the parkway west of the churchyard
bears a likeness of Garrison's clumsy press; and in the space below
are these words of explanation :
"Fifty feet west of this spot William Lloyd Garrison,
edited The Journal of the Times Oct. 3, 1828 March
27, 1829. Hither came Benjamin Lundy, Dec. 6, 1828,
to enlist him in the cause of the slave. Garrison de-
parted hence to lift up in Baltimore the banner of imme-
diate emancipation."
[89]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
Throughout the entire town, the air is electric with memories of
General Stark's eventful battle. They centre naturally about the
stately shaft of blue dolomite that overtops the town. Thirty-seven
feet square at the base and three hundred and six feet high, the Ben-
nington spire raises its head among the mountains to be heralded
afar as the tallest battle-monument in the world. From, its lofty
lookout-floor, one may almost breathe again the smoke of the conflict
and hear the voice of the cannon speaking in the valley. Under its
tapering shadow is the ground on which Stark's men rested on the
eve of the battle. The inscription on the rough stone marker is brief
yet comprehensive.
"General John Stark's campaign ground August 14-15-16, 1777.
'There are the Redcoats and they are ours or this night Molly Stark
sleeps a widow.' '
Another slab not far from the base of the monument records the
passing of the Continental Storehouse which was a rallying point for
the Green Mountain Boys and a building which Burgoyne expected
his Hessians to capture. Their failure to plant the British flag on the
ridgepole of this Colonial arsenal was the first of a series of disasters,
the end of which was the surrender of their commander.
Within the churchyard, the Bennington Historical Society has
reared this tribute, dedicating it to the valiant fighters of both sides
whose names are past reclaiming.
"Around this stone lie buried many patriots who fell in the Battle
of Bennington. Here also rest British soldiers, Hessians who died
from wounds after the battle. As captives, they were confined in the
first meeting house built in Vermont which stood on the green west
of this burying ground."
In like manner, many of the single marble slabs reflect the battle
light of Revolutionary days. Perhaps it may be only a line down near
the ground, worded after this fashion, "Born on the eve of Benning-
ton Battle." Or again it may remind us that the one whose name we
behold "fell fighting for the freedom of his country in the battle
fought between General Stark and Colonel Baum, called Bennington
Battle."
Other tablets there are which tell of the less spectacular struggle
[90]
TABLETS THAT TALK
which went on outside the battle lines. Let us forget the grim humor
of the verse and think only of the character it depicts.
"A husband tender, a parent dear.
For human woes dispensing virtues tears:
With useful toil he filled his narrow span,
A pleasant neighbor and an honest man."
No doubt this eulogy, as was usually the case on eighteenth
century headstones, is somewhat too large for the subject, but after
all allowances have been set aside, we still feel like making obeisance
over the narrow mound. Any man who could fill his life with arduous,
commonplace work and yet find time to be a good neighbor, and an
honest one withal, is entitled to the homage of every passer-by. All
hats off to the lowly open-hearted pioneer ! Though his life may have
been unpolished and restricted, it was charged with a real love for
the human kind.
After a thoughtful inspection of the various inscriptions, one
comes inevitably to the conclusion that good neighbors were every-
where in those days. There is no dearth of kindly sentiment among
those weird and aged testimonials. Sometimes the words get to run-
ning wild, leaving the thought far behind, but always underneath
them all is the steady glow of loyalty and brotherhood. Here is a case
in point :
"Lo ! where the silent marble weeps,
A friend sincere and a father sleeps ;
A heart within whose sacred cell
The peaceful virtues love to dwell."
The first line sounds well but it rather grates on some of our
unpoetical theories. It is the more common idea that marble was
intended by nature as medium for preserving records and handing
them down to posterity. At least, that has been its chief function in
the old Bennington Cemetery. There is nothing about the rough
rudely-finished slabs that is in any way suggestive of weeping.
The other three lines are better and they frame the kind of pic-
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
ture that lies half hidden on many another of the nearby stones
the picture of a simple industrious life carried through to a close under
exacting conditions. Life in Colonial times was never easy; usually
it was the bitterest kind of a fight. And yet Duty seldom had to
speak twice to those men. Possibly her voice was stronger then than
it is today. However that may be, the present generation can do no
better than emulate their example and keep one ear open for the call.
[92]
Itl'ST OF KTHKX AI.LKN
Th'- fammis l.a.l.T of "Thi- Gr->n Mountain Hoys" and oapturer of Tirondi-roRa at th- l>.-ntnnlns
of th.- K.-volutionHry War. Koprnilucftl for Th<- Journal cif Aun-riran HUtory from a photograph of
:Klnal I. ust. iiy H K I'.-rklns. In th.' hall of th.- UaUKht.-rs) of the Am.-rlcan K.-volutton.
at Wahington. Dlstrli-t of Columbia.
[931
COMMODORE OLIVER HAZZARD PERRY
Reproduced for The Journal of American History from the Gilbert Stuart painting, owned by
Mr. Oliver Hazzard Perry, of Lowell, Massachusetts.
[96]
AN AMERICAN RED CROSS OPERATOR SHOWING MOVING I'lr'ITKKS IN A SU'K W A R I >
AT THK WALTER REEL) GENERAL. HOSPITAL IN WASHINGTON
This Interesting picture IB used through the courtesy of the M:u Mlllan Company. Reproduce<l frmii
their valuable publication. "The American Red Cross in the Groat War," by Henry P. Davison.
Chairman of the War Council of the American Red Cross.
"Couple with a shattered nervous system weeks of Inactivity, with the Idea of helplessness, with
the Idea of life abnormal; outside the pleasures of the world. It Is wonderful that all cripples are
not helpless. Yon must kill the Idea of helplessness almost as soon as It is born, for In a few
\\eeks It becomes very strong. You must show moving pictures <>f men who are crippled enjoying
themselves In normal ways, dancing, skating, paddling a canoe, swimming, playing billiards and
hundreds of things they cannot or do not know about. I could multiply these things a thousand-
fi'lil, things which you would refuse to believe. But they must be 'put tcrOM 1 '< the men early,
and it must he done by men who have had experience first hand." Letter from a erlppled soldier
to the Surgeon General, quoted In Davlsun's "American Red Cross In the Great War," page 127.
[97]
MONUMENT AT GREENSBORO. NORTH CAROLINA
Erected &a a memorial to the
the moat decisive battle
Carolina, near the So
il to the Revolutionary heroes who, on October 7, 1780, triumphed In one of
.les for American Independence, at King's Mountain, Cleveland County, North
iuth Carolina line. Here 910 of the American "Backwoods" Militia, uml'-r
[ICO]
>J?all
In ta
iurtal
pita tot tf)c protection of fyt flbanoontb pribatr
of Our Country
BY
JAMES WOODBURN HAMILTON
O WE not owe it to the memories of the men and women
whose bodies lie in these little burying spots, many of
which are totally abandoned and neglected to the ele-
ments, to take steps to rescue them and protect them
in the future?
Scattered throughout the country, principally in the
South and East, are little burial places, pathetic in their loneliness,
containing the graves of people whose names are often synonymous
with the development of their states, people whose lives were devoted
to the public service, who helped lay the foundation of the very liber-
ties and culture which we enjoy today, but whose last resting places
have been too often sold with the old estates and are now almost unrec-
ognizable, trodden undef foot by the beasts of the field, and some of
them merged into the farms surrounding them.
Fortunately many of these people left behind them enduring
monuments, not made with hands, for otherwise their earthly monu-
ments would long ago have ceased to remind the passer-by that their
ashes lie buried in these lonely spots.
May I suggest that the Historical Society of each state has the
proper organization to take over this work, which will appeal strongly
to every right-thinking man and woman.
Every county, no doubt has some one person, or society, who
now works with the State Historical Association, and who would
\\ithout any salary expense, and perhaps without any expense, arrange
to inspect these private graveyards twice a year, making a photograph
of the condition on their first visit and reporting regularly to
headquarters.
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
State Historical Societies should be interested, as much of great
historical value is connected with these neglected places where so many
of the leading men and women of the South and the North, as well,
are buried.
Surely the state itself from that point of view, would make a
grant sufficient to start the movement and a yearly grant for the
small necessary expenses.
Members of every family connected with these people would no
doubt gladly make a yearly contribution to the expenses, and wealthy
people might endow such a movement with sufficient funds; at least
it will do no harm to ventilate the idea as fully as its merit warrants.
It is my thought that every state would divide the work by coun-
ties and then by townships, having a large folder for each such bury-
ing ground in each township, with a photograph to show the condition
and a record of the names of those buried, with dates, etc., and the
addresses of the descendants.
It might well investigate the best means of protecting these lonely
little places for the benefit of the families who might themselves bear
the cost.
SIR JOHN JOHNSON
[102]
Jtttitto, % WatorH of
atna for Snouatrtal Ma?
BT
C. HERSCHEL KOYL, PH. D.
Fellow, 1881-1883, Johns Hopkins University
T IS a long way from the Patapsco to the Yellowstone
and from the pure science of the Johns Hopkins to its
application to the water of the west, and one hesitates
to place beside the stately papers of the Alumni Maga-
zine a simple tale of the development of an art which
makes life more enjoyable in this new land; but then
it is still farther in time and place from Athens, Greece, to Baltimore,
U. S. A., and when I recall the interest with which the scholars of
the Old World watched the development of the young Johns Hopkins
University I am emboldened to put this account of my work in the
west before the readers of the Alumni Magazine.
This country in itself is most interesting. Here are the evidences
of the earth's contortions, the towering lines of the Rocky Mountains
with the isolated peaks of the Sweetgrass Hills in Montana and the
Turtle Mountains in North Dakota, and here also their complement,
the innumerable deep wrinkles in the earth's surface now filled to a
depth of several hundred feet with mud from the adjoining hills.
Here lived and died and are lightly buried the great animals of earlier
days : here several glaciers have left their stories written on the low-
land and on the hillside; here are beautiful agates by the million and
semi-precious stones by the hundred thousand, petrified trees, beds of
coal, the Mesabi iron deposits, marble quarries, all on the surface or
near it; here roamed the herds of bison; here chinooks (narrow warm
winds) blow in midwinter; and here I have witnessed the temperature
drop 60 F. in one hour. Here are the headwaters of the Mississippi
and the Missouri : this is the land of Hiawatha ; here adventured Lewis
[103!
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
and Clark; here are the wonders of the Yellowstone and Glacier
National Parks. The country from the Mississippi to the Rockies,
say eight hundred miles east and west and many more miles north and
south, constitutes The Great Plains of early American history where
today would be a vast agricultural country if only it had enough rain-
fall ; and this brings me to my story.
On the east coast of America there are no high mountains
between the Atlantic and the interior, and the wet winds deposit their
moisture in rain across half the continent. Rainfall along the Atlantic
coast is some forty-five inches per year, gradually diminishing toward
the west until in Minnesota it averages twenty-seven inches per year.*
From the Pacific Ocean warm wet winds blow in, but they must cross
mountain ranges where it is so cold that they lose their moisture in
great depositions of rain and snow on the western slopes, so that by
the time they reach the plains to the east of the Rockies there is little
moisture left, and the rainfall in northern Montana and western
North Dakota is often not more than nine inches per year.
With the ground packed hard by generations of buffalo, with a
small rainfall, and with evaporation at the rate of one vertical inch
per week, it is easy to understand that soluble matters have not been
washed off the ground, much less out of it, and that wells, springs,
ponds, and slow moving streams are apt to contain water with more
than its share of mineral salts carbonates and sulphates of lime,
magnesia, and soda. But the reputation is often worse than the
water. One disgruntled chap said to me on my arrival : "In the east
you analyze water to determine its mineral content, here you assay it
to determine its moisture." As a matter of fact the water is no worse
than many waters in the east ; but in the east there is such an abund-
ance of comparatively clean soft fresh water that it is not necessary
to use the hard or dirty water, while on the Great Plains there is no
other water but that of the few sluggish streams or the highly mineral-
ized water of the wells. In the east an objectionable water is either
dirty or hard, or (from the mines) acid; but on the plains all water
troubles are ascribed to alkali. There are alkali waters (containing
sodium salts), also hard waters (containing calcium or magnesium
salts), also pond or slough waters containing the products of organic
decomposition, but in the old west any water less than perfect was
"alkali water."
[104]
FITTING THE WATERS OF THE GREAT PLAINS FOR INDUSTRIAL USE
The ideal water for drinking, for washing, for boiler, and for all
industrial purposes is clean and soft, practically pure water, and it is
astonishing how small a proportion of foreign matter will ruin it for
one or another purpose. Omitting poisons and bacteria and consider-
ing only the common ingredient, limestone, it is a fact that one part in
three thousand will render water unsuitable for industrial use. For
drinking, reasonably hard water containing, say, twenty grains per
gallon (or one part in three thousand) of dissolved limestone, if taken
from the gravel of wells or springs is excellent, because it is cool, clear,
and of good flavor; but for washing it is not suitable, because lime-
stone combines with soap very readily to form a useless bothersome
curd, and, to get a lather in hard water, one must use enough soap to
neutralize the limestone and then enough more to wash with. The
process is wasteful of three-quarters of the soap and very disagreeable
because the curd sticks on the wash basin, on your hair, on the clothes
of the laundry, and on anything it touches.
When hard water is used in a steam boiler, the heating of the
water precipitates the limestone as a hard scale on the boiler flues and
shell the carbonates of calcium and magnesium at about 212 F. and
the sulphates at about 300 and since this scale retards the flow of
heat from the flues to the water, more coal is burned, the flues get
much hotter, and in four or five months burn out and must be
renewed. In New England, where there is plenty of clean soft water,
boiler flues last in good condition from twelve to twenty years as com-
pared with the continuous repairs and the few months of life in a hard
water country; and when you know that there are, say, two hundred
and seventy-five flues in a locomotive boiler, and that they cost, say,
$6.00 each, you will see one of the reasons why it is expensive to use
hard water in a boiler. Another reason is that with locomotives cost-
ing $20,000 each and supposed to be earning interest on their value,
a week in hospital every little while is just so much lost ; and the worst
of all is that the boiler may, and often does, give way and begin to
leak on the road and then the train must wait until another engine
and crew come, often fifty to seventy-five miles, to haul it in. I
have seen divisions of one hundred to one hundred and fifty miles
where five dead engines per day was the average during winter.
In a country of such distances rapid settlement or development
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
is impossible without the railroad ; and in a country still sparsely set-
tled a railroad must be operated very carefully if its expenses are to
be kept within its income. Clean soft water is of prime importance to
any railroad; and in 1910 I came over here to prove it, and to prove
that it could be made from the water of the plains. It took me two
years to make the demonstration conclusive; but in 1912 I began to
build, and today on the Great Northern Railroad, for more than
eleven hundred miles over The Great Plains, every water station has
a water treating plant and trains move with as much safety and cer-
tainty as they do anywhere.
The art of water treatment requires a certain knowledge of chem-
istry for the precipitation or conversion of harmful matters which are
in solution; a certain knowledge of physics to accelerate the settling
of precipitates, mud, and organic slimes ; a certain facility in practical
mechanics for the design and construction of appliances which will as
easily handle one thousand gallons per minute as ten gallons, that
will automatically feed to the raw water, in continuous streams as it
is being pumped, the proper amount of each of the two or three chemi-
cals necessary for the treatment of that water, and which mechanism
must all be so simple that it can be operated by the ordinary railroad
pumper, about the poorest paid man in the railroad service. A gallon
of water weighs fifty-eight thousand grains; and when I tell you
that the water in any track tank seldom varies two grains per gallon
from standard quality, no matter what the quality of the raw water,
and barring only times of sudden changes due to freshets, you will
know that we have achieved what we sought.
The chemistry of water treatment is very simple nowadays, but
its beginning in 1840 by Dr. Clark of Mareschal College, Aberdeen,
Scotland, made one of the romances of the science. The hardness of
water was known to be due to carbonate of lime dissolved in the water
and sometimes amounted to as much as forty grains of limestone per
gallon of water. But carbonate of lime, that is, marble, ordinary lime-
stone, chalk, sea shell, cannot be dissolved in water beyond about three
grains per gallon. So how did that spring or well water get so hard?
Doctor Clark had been a practising physician and had noted the
roughened hands, the much scrubbed clothes, the gummy hair, and
the many discomforts of hard water for washing, and when he become
[106]
FITTING THE WATERS OF THE GREAT PLAINS FOR INDUSTRIAL USE
professor of chemistry at Mareschal College, he immediately set the
analysis and cure of hard water as one of his problems. Soon he
discovered that the limestone dissolved in water is not a simple car-
bonate of lime a union of one molecule of calcium oxide with one
molecule of carbonic acid, but a bi-carbonate a union of one molecule
of calcium oxide with two molecules of carbonic acid. Now the bi-car-
bonate of calcium does not exist in the dry state ; it exists only in solu-
tion in water, and therefore the water in the ground must have car-
ried the extra molecule of carbonic acid when it flowed over the mole-
cule of mono-carbonate of lime, and was thus able to pick up the mole-
cule of limestone or chalk or marble in its passage.
Then Doctor Clark's reasoning was something like this: if that
limestone, that mono-carbonate of calcium, is not soluble in water
unless the water carries an equivalent amount of carbonic acid, then
if I can steal away the extra carbonic acid from the water the lime-
stone will fall to the bottom and the water will be soft. Now how can
I do that ? Well, in the first place, the atom of calcium has a tremen-
dous chemical affinity. When it is combined with an atom of oxygen
to form a molecule of calcium oxide (CaO), the union is practically
inseparable, and the chemical affinity is not yet satisfied. When it
also picks up and combines with a molecule of carbonic acid to form
a molecule of calcium mono-carbonate (CaO, CO 2 ), the grasp is still
strong, for it requires high temperature or strong acid to tear away
the molecule of carbonic acid ; but when it picks up a second molecule
of carbonic acid and becomes a bi-carbonate (CaO, COj, CO*), it
must be getting overloaded for we know that the heat of boiling water
in a tea kettle will chase away this last molecule and let down the
mono-carbonate as scale in the tea kettle. If the molecule of CaO
holds the first molecule of CO 2 more strongly than it does the second,
then another molecule of CaO introduced into the water ought to
steal away that second molecule of CO 2 , and we will have two mole-
cules of limestone (CaO, CO 2 ), both insoluble in water and both bound
to settle to the bottom like little snowf lakes! And sure enough, the
addition of the proper amount of CaO freshly burned lime
effected just this reaction, precipitated the old limestone and the new.
and left soft water.
Can you imagine a more beautiful operation, a chemical combina-
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
tion more nearly theoretically perfect ? Limestone makes water hard
and in turn lime makes it soft. To this day, to the ordinary man who
considers lime merely baked limestone this is the most marvelous thing
in the world. But this was the beginning of the science of water
softening.
The process was put in effect in a large way by the use of two
tanks alternately, one to be filled with water, treated with fresh lime
stirred in and given time to settle, while the other was being used.
Soon they learned to destroy the hardness due to sulphate of lime by
the use of carbonate of soda, and that practically the same methods can
be used to get rid of the magnesium salts which also make water
hard. Then the process was made continuous by appliances which
fed properly proportioned streams of the two chemicals into a steady
stream of water flowing to the bottom of a settling tank, where the
precipitated limestone remained while the clear soft water rose slowly
to the overflow near the top.
At this stage, simply as a process for softening water for indus-
trial use, the apparatus and method came to this country in 1898, and
here have been made the studies and improvements which have devel-
oped the process into one suitable for treating water of any kind, hard,
alkaline, or muddy, in any quantity, say, two or three million gallons
an hour, for any purpose, including drinking. The old plants mixed
chemicals and water merely by confluence, but the mixing was very
far from complete and there was much after-precipitation and clog-
ging of pipes and mysterious "growing" of said grains in filters.
Nowadays the water and the reagents are mixed for half an hour and
in some cases for two hours by mechanical stirring with power fur-
nished by a wheel operated by the inflowing water; nowadays properly
treated water will flow through a pipe for years and leave the pipe
cleaner than when new; and as for sand filters, they are not needed,
for the settling of precipitate is so complete that no sand filter can
improve the water.
Most striking of all since adequate mixing has been accomplished
is the cleaning effect of the great snowstorm of precipitate. It makes
no matter how many germs are in the raw water, say fifty thousand
per cubic centimeter, you never find ten per cubic centimeter in treated
and settled water. And the process is most illuminative of the condi-
[108]
FITTING THE WATERS OF THE GREAT PLAINS FOR INDUSTRIAL USE
tion of ordinary coloring matters dissolved in water the colors from
woods, fallen leaves, and peat bogs for they all go down with the
precipitate. From one well in North Dakota the water looks like
black ink, but the treated water is crystal clear. Not only does the
railroad profit from the water softening, working one locomotive
where two worked before, but towns are getting clean soft water for
everybody's use. Formerly I talked of the "Science of Water Soften-
ing," now I call it the "Art of Water Purification."
There is not space to tell you of half the interesting things to be
found here, but one I must not forget a continental divide in the
middle of prairies. Everyone knows of the north and south mountain
ridge in the Rockies where a drop of rain falling an inch to the west
flows to the Pacific, or an inch to the east to the Atlantic; but very
few know that in North Dakota is an east and west ridge only a few
feet high, which separates the waters flowing to Hudson Bay from
those flowing to the Gulf of Mexico, and that to the north of the ridge
as also in most of Montana, you do not go down east or up north, but
"up south." Come to Glacier Park this summer, call for me, and I'll
show you glaciers in the melting.
[109]
A History of the Origin and De-
velopment of Banks and Banking
and of Banks and Banking in the
City of New York :-: x :-:
BY
W. Harrison Bayles
and
Frank Allaben
FRANK ALLABEN, Editor-in-Chief
[no]'
CHAPTER I
Banking in flntiquitp
Necessity for Means of Exchange Exchange of Commodities
Silver Becomes the Standard of Exchange Hammurabi, King of
Babylonia, Introduces the Use of the Written Contract The First
Promissory Note The First Promissory Note with Renewal-
Stamped Coinage Comes into Use No Fixed Rate of Interest on
Loans The Greeks Install Money Exchange Markets Pasion
Establishes a Bank at Athens Rome Comes into Prominence in the
Banking World Ancient Roman Bronze Coinage Silver and Gold
Coinage Becomes the Medium of Exchange in the Roman Markets-
Weight of Coinage Reduced Rome Appoints Public Bankers and
Fixes the Rate of Interest at Five Per Cent. Beginnings of the Mod-
ern System of Bookkeeping Rome Adopts from Greece the Use of
Bills of Exchange Government Loans Installed Counterfeiting
Becomes Frequent Roman Coinage Becomes the Medium of
Exchange Throughout the World.
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
Hanking in Antujnitg
HE institution of a bank presupposes the existence of
some medium of exchange, or money. At the present
day, in all civilized countries, this is gold or silver or
its representative. It has been almost an invariable
rule that every race or community of people, at all
removed from a savage state, has adopted some
medium of exchange to facilitate trade, and almost invariably the
commodity known to them to have the most stable value, it being at
the same time desirable and durable, has been selected for that purpose.
The earliest commerce was a simple exchange of goods, as boys
"trade" knives, marbles, and other trinkets. But trade grew complex,
and as each man desired to secure many things, from different sources,
in exchange for the few things he produced, it became indispensable
to adopt some one thing as a standard of value in the terms of which
all other values could be stated, and thus all values measured and com-
pared. The standard of value adopted would thus become a "medium
of exchange" or money; and if a man traded the few things he had
to barter for this medium of exchange he would then hold something
acceptable to all traders alike and thus exchangeable for any
commodity.
Among a people advanced in the arts and sciences of civilization
there are no articles so well suited for such a medium of exchange as
the precious metals, gold and silver. But in ancient times, when com-
munication between nations was slow and imperfect, it was not every
nation that had within its borders sufficient gold or silver to make it
practical to use either as money, and thus some more abundant material
had to be used for that purpose. Articles that have been so employed
at different times by different peoples are numerous, and the facts
presented to us in history seem very curious at the present day.
In a community of people supporting themselves by hunting, the
proceeds of the chase are very likely to be used for trade. The skins
of wild animals, suitable for clothing, are well adapted to the purpose ;
and there is abundant evidence that in many ancient nations furs or
skins were used as money. Jevons claims that this is indicated in the
[112]
BANKING IN ANTIQUITY
passage in Job ii. 4, which reads: "Skin for skin, yea, all that a man
hath will he give for his life." We have recent illustration of this
use of skins among the Indians of North America.
Among a people of pastoral life, sheep and cattle naturally would
be used to perform some of the functions of money, and there is evi-
dence that this was the case among the ancient people of the East.
There are several passages in the Iliad of Homer where oxen are
spoken of as a measure of value, the worth of articles being named
in oxen. 1
Among people supporting themselves by agriculture, different
kinds of grain were used as a medium of exchange from the most
remote antiquity down to the present day. In the same way olive oil
was employed in those countries of the East where it was produced.
Articles of ornament have also been used as money, as the wampum of
the North American Indians and the cowry shells of the East Indies.
When any commodity becomes desirable, not merely from its use
to the person who owns or desires it, but because it is readily exchange-
able for other things, that article easily becomes money in the com-
munity in which it is held, and will be used as such unless another
material better adapted to the purpose, is at hand.
The first instance in Biblical history of a purchase of property
for money was that made by Abraham of the cave of Macphelah. On
the death of Sarah, Abraham sought to buy a field and cave for a
burying place. The owner of the property was Ephron, the Hittite,
and of him Abraham asked the price. Ephron, in a spirit of friend-
ship, offered to present it to Abraham. 'The land," said he, "is worth
four hundred shekels of silver: what is that betwixt me and thee?
bury therefore thy dead." Abraham, however, preferred to pay the
price and weighed out to Ephron four hundred shekels of silver,
"current money of the merchants." This is the story as related by
Moses.
The land of Canaan, at that time, appears to have been an open
grazing ground, something like our western country of some years
iln the pastoral lands of the East the lamb naturally became a medium of exchange and a standard
of valuation, other things being measured as worth so many lambs. When silver began to displace the
lamb as a standard, it was almost inevitable for a certain definite weight of silver to be accepted aa the
exact equivalent of the value _of a lamb; and it would be the most natural thing in the world, at the out-
set, to describe this fixed weight of stiver as ' a lamb of silver." This explains certain curious passages
in the Bible (Gen. xxxiii. 19; Josh. xxiv. 32; Job xlii. 11), where in place of the text, "an hundred pieces
of silver," for example, in Gen. xxxiii. 19, the reader will find in the margin the more literal translation,
"an hundred lambs of silver." F. A.
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
ago. Abraham was a herder or raiser of cattle. He did not produce
silver, and the only way that he was likely to obtain it was in exchange
for cattle. Ephron, also, it seems, was not ignorant of its value, and
the inference is that silver was a current medium of exchange. It
was the money of that time and country. If silver was then the
money among the cattlemen of the land of Canaan, it is more than
likely that it was such in the neighboring cities ; and we are confirmed
in this by all we can gather from the history of those ancient lands.
Skins or grain or cattle may have performed some of the functions of-
money in limited districts, but there is no doubt that silver very early
came to be relied upon when trade was extensive.
Some years later, it is recorded, Jacob pitched his tent before the
city of Shalem and purchased a part of the field on which he had
spread his tent for a hundred kesitahs. This is translated in the
accepted version as "pieces of money," but scholars believe the kesitah
to have been a weight.
In the time of famine, when Joseph's brethren came down to
Egypt to buy corn, their money is spoken of as being returned to them
in their sacks, "in its full weight." It was, no doubt, silver or some
other metal. Although silver was extensively used as money in the
time of Joseph, it was apparently not abundant, for in a short time all
the money of Egypt and Canaan had been paid into the treasury of
Pharaoh for grain. Silver, by weight, appears to have been the cur-
rent money of the nations of the East, dating back beyond the dawn
of history. The weighing of the precious metals is represented on
the Egyptian monuments, where gold and silver are shown to have
been kept in rings. There is no doubt that the Assyrians and Babylon-
ians, rivals of Egypt in civilization, had a similar custom, as clay
tablets have been found in the ruins of their cities showing grants of
money by weight.
The oldest code of laws in existence the laws of Hammurabi,
King of Babylonia, a contemporary of Abraham indicates as early
as 2700 B. C, an advanced state of civilization in trade and all trans-
actions incident thereto. Among the statutes of this antique code are
many laws in regard to merchants, agents, landlords, interest, rent,
mortgage, etc. A few samples will show us that surprisingly well-
developed business methods existed even in that ancient period.
BANKING IN ANTIQUITY
"If a merchant gives to an agent grain, wool, oil or goods of any
kind with which to trade, the agent shall write down the value and
return (the money) to the merchant. The agent shall take a sealed
receipt for the money which he gives to the merchant."
"If a man shall give silver, gold, or anything whatever to a man
on deposit, all whatever he shall give he shall shew to witnesses and
shall fix bonds and shall give on deposit.
"If without witness and bonds he has given on deposit, and where
he has deposited they keep disputing him, this case has no remedy." 8
In Babylonia contracts, or instruments of credit, were drawn up
in the presence of a proper legal official, on clay tablets. The original,
inclosed in a clay envelope or case, was deposited for safety in a
temple, or in the chamber of records provided by law or custom, while
copies were taken by one or both of the contracting parties. Columbia
Tniversity is the owner of Babylonian clay tablets, dating as far back
at 2700 B. C, showing varied commercial transactions.
Many such documents, preserved in the British Museum, are
records of deeds and the partition of real estate. Some record loans
of silver at interest, and these become numerous in the reigns of
Nebuchadnezzar and Nabopolasser (625-604 B. C). Records of loans
secured by mortgage on land, and guarantee bonds, are also among
the curious commercial documents taken from the ruins of the ancient
city of Babylon. One of the tablets found is very clearly a promissory
note, wherein one man- promises to pay another a certain sum at the
end of a fixed time. When the time drew near for him to pay the
note he renewed it ; there are several renewals written upon the tab-
lets. For many generations, before and after the reign of Nebuchad-
nezzar, members of the family of Egibi did an extensive business as,
bankers, or financiers, for the people of Babylon.
In the time of Moses, and much later, the money spoken of as in
ordinary use was principally silver money. Gold is referred to as
-'Other provisions of this extraordinary codification of the civil and criminal law of primitive times
indicate that the temples of Babylonia had even then developed the functions of savings institutions and
banks of deposit; that the temple deposits were invested and loaned out at interest, like the funds of mod-
ern banks; and that with the temple bankers could be arranged permanent investments of principal, yield-
ing fixed annuities, which could be bought, sold, and inherited, like those of mediaeval and modern times.
Such conditions bespeak a high development of trade and industry, with capital constantly in demand
through never-ending opportunities for remunerative investment. Indeed, the Babylon of Hammurabi's
:kc that of Nebuchadnezzar two millenniums later, held commerce with the whole ancient world, and
anticipated the industrial cities of Europe in the Middle Ages in elaboration of trades and organization of
trade-guilds. A number of provisions in Hammurabi's code regulated conditions of trade-apprentice-
ship. F. A.
[115]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
valuable and as used for ornamental purposes, but less frequently as
money. Among the spoils taken from the Canaanitish city of Jericho,
however, we find (Joshua vii. 21), "a goodly Babylonish garment,
two hundred shekels of silver, and a wedge of gold of fifty shekels
weight." Early metallic money was in the form of bars, spikes, rings,
etc., and, whether silver or other metal, being a commodity which
every one was willing to receive in exchange for his property, was
just as much money as the stamped coins of a later period.
Although there probably was no coined money in his time, Solo-
mon knew the value of ready cash, for in Ecclesiastes x. 9, he says:
"A feast is made for laughter and wine maketh merry; but money
answereth all things." Hiram, King of Tyre, was the fast friend of
David and Solomon and greatly assisted Solomon in building the first
great temple at Jerusalem. Sidon was also under Hiram's dominion.
These two Phoenician cities, on the coast, were then at the height of
their glory and prosperity. They sent out colonies to the islands and
shores of the Mediterranean, and their maritime trade extended not
only to all the coasts of this sea, but even beyond the Pillars of Her-
cules. The metal rings, supposed to be money, found in Celtic ruins,
are thought to have been introduced among the Celts by Phoenician
merchants or traders. 3
sAlthough money had been in use for centuries and even milleniums before the days of Solomon and
Hiram, the transactions of these kings illustrated, on a truly royal scale, the primitive method of direct
barter of goods. Solomon suggested to Hiram an exchange of products of Palestine for timber from
Lebanon, to which Hiram replied: "I have considered the things which thou sendest to me for, and I will
do all thy desire concerning timber of cedar and concerning timber of fir. Thy servants shall bring them
down from Lebanon unto the sea; and I will convey them by sea in floats unto the place that thou
shalt appoint me, and will cause them to be discharged there, and thou shalt receive them; and thou shalt
accomplish my desire, in giving food for my household." Thus "Hiram gave Solomon cedar trees and
fir trees according to all his desire, and Solomon gave Hiram twenty thousand measures of wheat for food
to his household and twenty measures of pure oil. Thus gave Solomon to Hiram year by year." I Kings
v. 8-n).
We also learn that from Hiram Solomon received a great store of gold, which he got also, together
with silver, copper and iron, from the kings and princes all about him, the governors, the merchants and
the Queen of Sheba. He joined the Phoenician king on the high seas, establishing merchant fleets on the
Red Sea and Indian Ocean, and also on the Mediterranean, manned by Hiram's sailors. "The servants
also of Hiram and the servants of Solomon, which brought gold from Ophir, brought" also "the algum
trees and precious stones." This was the traffic of "the navy of ships" the fleet or merchant marine
which "King Solomon made ' 'on the lip of the Red Sea' " (I Kings ix. 26) ; while also "the
king had at sea a navy of Tharhish with the navy of Hiram; once in three years came the navy of
Tharshish, bringing gold and silver, ivory ['elephants' teeth'], and apes and peacocks" (I Kings x. 22).
Caravans also plied overland from Egypt, and from Babylonia, Assyria, and other marts in the East.
"All the earth sought to Solomon and brought every man his present vessels of silver, and vessels of
gold, and garments, and armour, and spices, horses, and mules, a rate year by year." Solomon "had
horses brought out of Egypt, and linen yarn. The king's merchants received the linen yarn at a price."
Was the traffic in linen merely a carrying trade, or did Solomon encourage a guild of weavers at
Jerusalem, like those in Ancient Babylon and mediaeval Florence and Flanders? As for horses and
chariots, Solomon supplied other kingdoms as well as his own; for "a chariot came up and went out of
Egypt for six hundred of silver, and a horse for an hundred and fifty; and so for all the kings of the
Hittites, and for the kings of Syria, did they bring them out by their hands." Solomon had fourteen hun-
dred chariots and twelve thousand horsemen, whom he "bestowed in the cities for chariots." He had
''four thousand stalls for horses and chariots." The vessels of his house were all pure gold, none of
[116]
BANKING IN ANTIQUITY
One step forward from the irregular pieces of silver, or other
metal, which were weighed out in making purchases, was the adoption
of a uniform size, or weight, in the pieces or rings, as is shown to be
the case by the Egyptian monuments, where the rings appear to be of
the same size. From this to a stamped coin, whose value or weight
was warranted by the stamp of authority, would be a natural step,
yet it took a long time to accomplish it.
In very early times seals were employed to signify possession, to
ratify contracts, and to indicate authority. Thus, when a ruler certi-
fied the weights of pieces of metal, he naturally employed his seal, or
some distinctive mark, to make it known, just as a goldsmith stamps
his plate. The earliest coins were stamped on only one side, and no
attempt was made to so shape them that they could not be altered with-
out destroying the stamp or design. Coinage was in its rudimentary
stages.
The stamping of a piece of metal with a mark, guaranteeing its
weight, which made of it a coin, naturally much increased its useful-
ness as money, and the invention, if it may be so called, soon spread
throughout the countries of the East and was of great importance to
trade and commerce. In the course of time, not long after this, men
came forward who made it their exclusive business to care for the
money of other people and to act as agents in all financial transactions.
These were the bankers and brokers of the ancient.
It is not within the province of this work to go into the details
of the history of coins and coinage. It would be too tedious. We
shall therefore accept as money the coins we shall meet with in deal-
ing with the history of banks and bankers, giving them attention only
when of special interest. Silver was first coined, it is alleged, in the
ninth century B. C, more than a thousand years after the time of
Abraham. The invention is ascribed to Pheidon, King of Argos. 4
silver, for silver "was nothing accounted of in the days of Solomon." he having made "silver in Jerusalem
M stones, and cedars * * as the sycamore trees that are in the vale, for abundance" (I Kings x.,
II Chron. ix.. x.).
Can we doubt our astonishment, at the perfection of ancient methods and their approach to our own,
could we discover some treatise setting forth in detail the business, financial, and banking expedients
behind a world-commerce which heaped up such magnificence? F. A.
4lt is well to emphasize the fact, therefore, that the necessity of trade had mothered the invention
of our machinery of credit long before precious metals were cast into the convenient form of coin. If
details of the credit system and instruments employed in ancient Babylonia have not vet, perhaps, fully
been brought to light, we at least know that in Assyria as early as the ninth century before Christ, and
probably much earlier, as well as in the Babylon of Nebuchadnezzar, commerce was carried on, as now,
by means of promissory notes, bills of exchange, and transfer checks like those of the modern bank of
deposit, although the values dealt in through these commercial instruments were not coin, but gold and
silver designated by weight. F. A.
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
The first coins of Greece were of silver, and no other metal was
used to any great extent until after the time of Alexander the Great.
The loaning of money for interest was practiced long before coins
were used. Interest or "usury" is spoken of in the Book of Exodus,
in Leviticus, and also in Deuteronomy (xxiii. 19, 20), where the Jews
were allowed to take usury from strangers, but not from their own
people. In all probability the introduction of coinage made the use
of money more general and the loaning of money more extensive.
Solon, among other reforms at Athens, abolished the law by which a
creditor could sell or enslave a debtor, and prphibited the lending of
money on a person's own body. The rate of interest on loans was
left to the discretion of the lender.
Whether there existed at Athens a class of professed money-
lenders in the time of Solon is uncertain, but in the time of Demos-
thenes there were many of them. This kind of business was then
chiefly carried on by resident aliens or f reedmen. The ancient usurers
and money-lenders, by the exaction of exorbitant rates, and the
bankers of antiquity in general, from the great profits gained by them
and the severity with which they exacted what was due, made them-
selves as unpopular as the Jewish money-lenders became in more mod-
ern times. In return for their large profits, Greek lenders, like the
Jews, had to accept a position of social inferiority and even to endure
ill-treatment. Demosthenes intimates that among the Athenians the
fact that a man was a money-lender was sufficient to prejudice him
even in a court of law.
In Greece, bankers were called tr apes-it ai, because they sat at
tables in the market-places. They acted as money-changers and
money-lenders, received money on deposit, and made payments as
directed by depositors. For a commission they exchanged money of
large denominations for smaller, and the money of one system for
that of another, the difference in standards and the uncertainty of
the stamped coin creating a considerable trade of this kind. 5
5We can gather a picture of the important functions discharged by the Athenian money-changers if
we recollect that the trade-center of the world, passing in turn from Babylonia, Egypt, Assyria, Babylon,
and Phoenicia, had established itself in the market-place of the Greek metropolis, where the fleets of the
world discharged their cargoes and the currency of every nation appeared on exchange. The commercial
paper of the merchants of Egypt and Phoenicia was bought and sold in the Athenian market, and here
transfers of credit were affected. Here also the foreign traders from every shore, flocking to this central
depot of world-goods to purchase cargoes for their galleys. each with the currency of his own city in his
hands, resorted to the money-changers to get the equivalent of his money in the coin of Athens, which
he could pass without question among the Athenian merchants, and in the terms of which all their goods
were appraised. F. A.
[118]
BANKING IN ANTIQUITY
Money was placed with the Greek bankers, partly for safekeeping
and partly to benefit from their skilful management of it, the deposi-
tor engaging the bankers to make all payments. As in modern times,
Greek bankers received money on deposit at what they considered a
low rate of interest, and loaned it at a higher one. From the public
character of their business, the bankers naturally gained considerable
experience, became proficient at accounts and in finance, and were
often consulted in the ordinary affairs of life and business, and as
experts in connection with the finances of the cities. They became,
too, an unofficial sort of notaries public. They were not always suc-
cessful in business. There are recorded instances of bankers who lost
everything they possessed, becoming utterly bankrupt.
While not altogether escaping the common prejudice against their
calling, some bankers of the higher class were held in much esteem,
great confidence being placed in them. Their credit enabled them
promptly to raise money in distant cities at any time. Pasion was a
wealthy and well-known banker of Athens. About 380 B. C. he set
up a banking concern by which, together with a shield manufactory,
he amassed enormous riches, at the same time establishing a character
for integrity which gave him credit throughout all Greece. With his
money, on several occasions, he rendered great services to Athens, and
was rewarded with the freedom of the city and enrolled in the demus
of Acharnae.
About this time money was loaned at Athens at the rate of from
twelve to eighteen per cent. This high rate is attributed to the lack
of protection given by the law to creditors, or rather to the lack of the
proper administration of the law. In cases of bottomry, an early form
of marine insurance, the rate was much higher, sometimes as high as
thirty-six per cent.
Before bankers as a special class came into existence, the func-
tion of the bank was to some extent supplied, among the Greeks as
in ancient Babylonia, by the great temple sanctuaries, such as Delphi,
Delos, Ephesus, and Samos. These were used as safe places for the
The money of the Greek cities alone would have insured a thriving business, for each city had its
own currency, which no one cared to take outside the city bounds, with the honorable exception of the
Athenian silver drachmas, which were accepted far and near.
Thus the Athenian banker conducted an exchange bank, where the world's traders of his day could
deposit their diverse currencies and receive an equivalent, less commission, in the standard coin of
Athens, a service, as we shall see, precisely analagous to that which constituted the chief function of the
famous Bank of Amsterdam three centuries ago. -F. A.
[i 19]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
deposit of treasures, and, having large funds of their own, they em-
ployed productively both these and the sums confided to them by
means of loans at interest. They had dealings both with individuals
and states.
The arrangement of a loan depended on the relation between the
borrower and lender and their confidence in each other. Sometimes
no security was given, but a simple acknowledgment was made by the
borrower, or a formal instrument was drawn up, executed by both
parties to the transaction, attested by witnesses, and deposited with a
third party, usually a banker. Witnesses were also present when the
loan was paid. At Athens, when land was mortgaged or given as
security, pillars were set up on it, on which were inscribed the amount
of the debt and the mortgagee's name. In other parts of Greece there
were public registers of debts, but they are not known to have existed
at Athens.
The most ancient coins of Rome and the old Italian states were
bronze. No other metal was used in the Roman coins till 269 B. C,
five years before the first Punic War, when silver was first coined.
Gold was coined in Rome sixty-two years after silver. Here, as else-
where, in earliest times, cattle were the medium of exchange, one ox
being reckoned as equal to ten sheep. It is supposed that copper or
bronze took the place of cattle as the standard of value between the
years 450 and 430 B. C.
The unit of value in the early Roman coinage was the as, which
was of bronze, at first equal in weight to a Roman pound of twelve
ounces. This gigantic piece was oblong like a brick and bore the
figure of an ox or other animal, whence the word pecunia, from peciis,
cattle. The next and most common form was circular, having the
two-faced head of Janus on one side and the prow of a ship on the
other, whence the expression of the Roman boys in tossing up capita
aut navim. This coin was not struck with the punch, but cast. In
most cases the edges of the coins show where they have been cut from
the casting. In the British Museum are four ases, joined together, as
they were taken from the mould.
According to ancient writers, in order to meet the expenses of
the state in the first Punic War, 264-241 B. C., the as was reduced
in weight from one pound to two ounces, or one-sixth of the old
[120]
BANKING IN ANTIQUITY
weight, and the Republic, with coins so reduced, paid its debts, thus
gaining five parts in six. In the second Punic War ases were made of
one ounce, the Republic thus gaining one-half. This, of course, was
a form of repudiation, and the example has been abundantly followed.
Some writers, however, state that the reduction of the as was gradual,
and that when the circular form first appeared the weight had been
reduced to nine ounces. This reduction in the weight of the as took
place not alone at Rome, but in the neighboring Italian states, and was
not uniform, so that it became usual to pay out the ases according to
weight, and not by tale, thus reverting to the original method, as is
sometimes done at the present day.
The Roman Forum, in the early history of Rome, was set apart
as a place for the administration of justice, for holding assemblies of
the people, and for other public business; but near the end of the
Republic it seems to have been chiefly used for judicial proceedings
and as a money-market. Here were found both public and private
bankers. The public banker of the highest class was a sort of extra-
ordinary magistrate, or commissioner, appointed by the state to assist
the people in times of great depression, the office being generally
filled by men of high rank. He sat in the portico or cloister of the
Forum, almost in the shadow of the temple of Saturn, where the
treasures of the state. were kept, at a table (mensa), whence he was
called mensarius."
Such public bankers were first appointed by the state in the year
352 B. C, at a time of great financial distress among the people of
Rome, when many were so deeply involved in debt that they were
obliged to borrow from new creditors in order to pay the old ones.
Laws had been passed to redress the debtors' grievances and to pro-
hibit excessive interest, but the relief was only partial. In this extrem-
ity it was thought necessary for the government to interfere, and
accordingly five commissioners, or public bankers, were appointed for
this purpose, whose duty it was to loan on proper security money from
the public treasury to those in need in order to stem the tide of depres-
If the bankers at Rome did not carry their tables well into the courts of the temple, in some of the
provincial capitals the dealers in exchange did so. Thus in the Roman province of Judaea, in the courts
of the sanctuary at Jerusalem, we get a striking picture, when Jesus "found in the temple those that
sold oxen and sheep and doves, and the changers of money sitting. And when He had made a scourge of
small cords, He drove them all out of the temple, and the sheep, and the oxen; and poured out the
changers' money, and overthrew the tables; and said unto them that sold doves, 'Take these things hence;
make not My Father's house an house of merchandise* " (John ii. 14-16). F. A.
[121]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
sion. They were also authorized to persuade or compel creditors to
receive cattle or land in payment of debts at a fair valuation, and in
various other ways to assist the people in bringing about a normal
and healthy condition. By these means, Livy tells us, a great amount
of debt was satisfactorily liquidated, but success was not complete.
As at Athens in the time of Solon, there was at Rome a rude state of
society, and the distress was in some respects similar.
The Roman law as to the payment of borrowed money was very
severe. Gellius gives us the ancient mode of procedure in the case of
debt, as fixed by the Twelve Tables. If the debtor admitted the debt,
or if judgment had been obtained against him by legal process for the
amount of the debt, he had thirty days allowed him for payment. At
the expiration of this time, if payment had not been made, he was
liable to be assigned over to the creditor by the sentence of the praetor.
The creditor was required to keep him in chains for sixty days, pub-
licly exposing him on certain days and proclaiming the amount of his
debt. If no one released him by paying the debt, the creditor might
sell him as a slave.
According to the letter of the law a creditor could put the con-
demned debtor to death, and if there were several creditors, they could
cut the debtor in pieces and each take his share of his body in propor-
tion to his debt ; but it is said that there was no instance of a creditor
ever having adopted this extreme measure. The creditor, however,
might treat the condemned debtor as a slave and compel him to work
out his debt, and in many such cases the treatment was very severe.
Five years after the great depression of 352 B. C, to further
relieve the distress of the people, which still continued, the legal rate
of interest was reduced to five per cent. We read of several usurers,
in 346 B. C., being punished for a violation of the law and subjected
to a penalty of forfeiture of four times the amount of the loan made.
Some years later the Genucian laws were passed, which cancelled all
debts and forbade the taking of any interest whatever. This was
absurd, for no one will lend without some profit. It was the same as
forbidding any loans at all, and was, of course, successfully evaded.
The attempt to abolish the rate of interest by law utterly failed and
was abandoned. Ten per cent., as prescribed by the Twelve Tables,
then became the legal and recognized rate. This was the legal rate
towards the close of the Republic and also under the Emperors.
[122]
BANKING IN ANTIQUITY
Unfortunately, no alteration was made in the law of debt. The
small farmers, by the ravages of war and the burden of taxes, were
driven into debt as a desperate and last resort, and debt ended practi-
cally, if not technically, in slavery. This had a remarkable influence
on the economic history of Rome. In ancient times lending for a
profit or interest was so much associated with cruelty and hardship
that all usury was branded as unjust, and debt and famine in the
minds of many were classed together. Cato is said to have ranked
usury with the crime of murder.
Public bankers, such as have been spoken of, were appointed at
Rome whenever debts weighed heavily upon the people, but with the
exception of the first time the number appointed in any emergency
appears to have been three. The business of these bankers was of
great importance, but there were two other kinds of public bankers, of
a lower grade, whose offices were permanent and whose duties were
of an inferior order. They assayed new coin, and through them the
newly coined money was put into circulation. They examined all kinds
of coins and decided whether they were of the proper metal or not,
and, for a certain percentage, exchanged for strangers all kinds of
foreign money for the coinage of Rome. Thus they combined, along
with their public duties, business on their own account.
Private bankers also, as well as the public bankers, had their
shops or tables in the cloisters of the Forum, especially under the
three-arched buildings called Jani, and were called argentarii (from
argentum, silver). Such bankers were found at Rome as early as
309 B. C, long before silver was coined at Rome, but the name can
be explained from the fact that they received foreign, especially
Southern Italian and Etruscan, silver, in exchange for the bronze
coinage of Rome.
The argentarii, in the time of the Republic, were strictly bankers.
They were money-changers and did all kinds of commission and
agency business for their customers. They not only received money
on deposit, but as their customers' agents attended public sales, got
in outstanding claims, and made payments in liquidation of debts.
Almost all money transactions were made through their intervention,
and they kept the account books of their customers. In receiving
deposits, if the deposit was not to draw interest it was called deposi-
tion, or vacua pecunia; if it was to draw interest it was called crcditntn.
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
The ancient Roman bankers' books of account are said to have
given rise to the modern Italian system of bookkeeping by double
entry. The codex accepti et expensi, or cash book of the banker, was
a book in which all receipts and payments were entered, with the date,
the person's name to whom credited or debited, and the details of the
transaction. The liber rationum, in which each client had a special
page, with the debit and credit accounts, correspond to the modern
ledger. Another book, called the adversaria, was used for the entry of
memoranda of unfinished business. During the time of the Empire
the public and private bankers were alike under the control of the
praefcctus urbi. In the provinces they were responsible to the gover-
nors. They were legally bound to keep their books with strict accur-
acy, and, in case of dispute, to produce them in court as evidence.
An argentarius never paid out any person's money without receiv-
ing a check, which was called praescriptio. The payment was made
either in cash, or, if the person to be paid kept an account with the
same banker, simply by a transfer of credit, no cash entering into the
transaction. In case of failure, the law declared that the claims of
depositors should be satisfied before those of persons who had money
at interest in the bank; thus the deposit-urn was paid before the
creditum.
When the Romans became acquainted with the Greek custom of
using bills of exchange, the bankers of Rome made payments for their
clients at Athens, or other distant cities, by drawing bills payable by
a banker in the place where payment was to be made. This made it
necessary for bankers to know the value of the same coins in different
places and at different times. Bankers also made payments for per-
sons who had not deposited money with them, which was the same as
a loan. Money paid through a banker was called per mensam, or de
m-ensa, while a payment made by a debtor in person was called ex area,
or dc domo.
The area was a chest or coffer in which the Romans were accus-
tomed to keep valuables, especially money. It stood in the atrium of
the house, and was made of iron, or of wood bound with either iron
or bronze. It was generally in the care of the porter, or, in the houses
of the very wealthy, of a special officer (arcarius), who made disburse-
ments. Some of these strong boxes were adorned with reliefs, as in
BANKING IN ANTIQUITY
the case of one taken from the ruins of Pompeii and now in the Naples
Museum. It stood on a heavy block of stone, or low foundation of
masonry, to which it was attached by an iron rod passing through the
bottom.
As regards the respect in which bankers were held at Rome, evi-
dence is contradictory, but we are forced to the conclusion that the
wealthy banker, who carried on business on a large scale and in an
honorable manner, was as much respected as a banker of modern
times, but that those who degraded their calling by acting as usurers
were not held in esteem. The feeling at Rome was about the same as
it still is in all countries.
Some claim that we should make no distinction between public
bankers and private bankers; that those termed public bankers, the
numularii and the mensularii, carried on their business on their own
account, and that those termed private bankers, the argcntarii, were
under the supervision of the state. It is at least true that the three
terms seem to have been, at times, used indiscriminately, and that all
three were applied to the grandfather of Augustus.
Up to the time of the conquest of Southern Italy the Romans had
only copper or bronze money of a most clumsy kind. From the con-
quered cities, which were colonies of Greece, thousands of statues and
works of art were sent to decorate the temples and public buildings of
the then barbaric city on the Tiber. The silver coinage of these con-
quered cities furnished beautiful models, and the coins struck at that
time by the Romans show the first evidence of the influence of Greek
art. The first denarius, or silver piece of ten ases, struck in the year
269 B. C, is evidently an imitation of the coins of the Greek cities. As
trade increased, with increasing dominion, Rome became the political
and commercial center of a vast empire and was visited by strangers
from all the surrounding countries.
In the second Punic War the Roman people were heavily taxed,
but even then the taxes were not sufficient to meet expenses, and
therefore a call was made on wealthy individuals to furnish seamen
and to advance money by way of loans. In payment of accounts for
stores and clothing for the army, orders on the treasury were given,
payable at some future time. Thus national debt came into existence.
The practice of ancient warfare made it certain that the wealthy
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
citizen, if Rome fell, would lose all he had, and perhaps his life. Every
man had thus an interest in success or failure, and loaning money to
the state was an act of self-preservation, the payment of the loan
being certain if Rome prevailed. Rome did prevail, and we find that
the first installment of this government loan was paid in the year
204 B. C, immediately after the submission of Carthage, and the sec-
ond and third installments subsequently at intervals of four years.
The contractors advanced their property to the state and received
in exchange tickets promising payment at some future time. In the
same manner the owners of eight thousand slaves, who were enlisted
in the army, gave them up to the state and awaited payment for them.
The fortunes of minors and widows, which were in the hands of
guardians, were also turned over to the state as loans. For all these,
treasury bills were issued, which, it is supposed, circulated among
tradesmen and others pretty much the same as do our bank notes and
treasury notes of today.
The comparative value of gold and silver varied considerably at
different periods of Greek and Roman history. Herodotus states it
as i to 13; Plato as i to 12; Minander as i to 10; and Livy, about 189
B. C., as i to 10; thus showing if these statements are correct, a
gradual increase in the value of silver as compared with gold. Julius
Caesar, according to Suetonius, on one occasion exchanged gold for
silver at the rate of i to 9. The most usual proportion, under the early
Roman emperors, was i to 12. Jevons states that "in the time of the
Romans gold was about ten times as valuable as silver, and silver
about ten times as valuable as copper, so that there would then have
been no difficulty in constructing a perfect decimal system of money."
Both in the time of the Republic and of the Empire there was great
difficulty experienced in regulating the circulation of silver and cop-
per together, and the difficulty was much increased when gold was
introduced.
In ancient Greece every free and independent city coined its own
money. Sparta and Byzantium are said to have coined iron money,
but no ancient iron coin has ever been found. Iron at that time is said
by Gladstone to have been a more valuable metal than copper. It has
been supposed that the government of Athens only watched over the
weight and purity of the metal, and that the people in their assembly
BANKING IN ANTIQUITY
regulated everything relating to the coinage of money. Individuals
who coined bad money were punished with death.
Juno was the Roman deity who presided over and was the
guardian of finance, and under the name of Moneta, or Juno Moneta,
she had a temple on the Capitoline Hill, in which was the mint, even
as the aerarium, or treasury, by a similar arrangement, was located in
the temple of Saturn. Thus this temple of Juno was where the Roman
money was coined, although the regulation and management of the
Roman mint during the period of the Republic is involved in obscurity.
The coining of money at Rome does not appear to have been an exclu-
sive privilege of the state, and it has been inferred from coins still
extant that probably every Roman citizen had the right to have his
own gold and silver coined in the public mint and under the superin-
tendence of its officers. None, however, had the right to put his own
image upon a coin. Julius Caesar was the first to whom this privilege
was granted, and his example was followed by his royal successors.
So long as only pure silver and gold were used by the state in its
coinage, bad money does not seem to have been coined by any one;
but when, in 90 B. C, the expedient was resorted to of mixing with
the silver one-eighth of its weight of copper, an example was given,
and temptation to counterfeit was offered to the people. Counterfeit-
ing appears henceforth to have occurred frequently. As early as 86
B. C. the making of counterfeit money was carried to such an extent
that no one was sure whether the money he possessed was genuine or
false. A means of testing money, and of distinguishing the good from
the bad, is said to have been discovered at this time. What this was is
not made clear, but some method of examining silver coins must have
been known to the Romans long before this. Heavy punishment was
inflicted on the coiners of false money.
Roman money was generally coined at Rome, but in some cases
the mints of other Italian cities were used. During the Republic,
subject countries and provinces were not deprived of the right of coin-
ing their own money, which they retained even under the Empire for
a long time. When all Italy received the Roman franchise, they
henceforth used the Roman money and consequently lost the right to
coin their own. From the time of Augustus the emperors assumed
the exclusive privilege of coining gold and silver, and some time later
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
the right to coin all money. As, however, the vast extent of the empire
made it necessary to use more than one mint, in several provinces, such
as Gaul and Spain, Roman money was coined under the superinten-
dence of quaesters or proconsuls. Roman money gradually came into
use throughout the whole extent of the empire, at first more com-
pletely in the western part, but eventually also in the East.
Rome, in her career of conquest, became the center of all kinds
of business. Conquered people were sent to Rome as slaves and
thence were transferred the treasures of the conquered cities. The
revenue of the state was derived from custom duties, levied on certain
kinds of goods, both export and import, rents of public property, tolls
for passengers and goods carried across bridges or ferries, etc. The
manufacture of salt was a government monopoly, and mines and fish-
eries were public property.
In Rome's palmy days, the Provincial land-tax formed the chief
revenue of the Republic. The Romans served as soldiers and were
lightly taxed, while there was no land-tax in Italy itself. We find
that in 167 B. C. the payments exacted from the provinces had become
so great that extraordinary taxes were dispensed with altogether, and
the ordinary revenues were sufficient for all future wars, as well as
for the civil administration. The provincial land-taxes were, every
five years, put up to public auction, and the highest bidder received
the contract. The "farmers" of the taxes paid a certain sum for the
right of collecting the taxes, and made what profit they could.
There were many wealthy men in Rome, and there was continuous
intercourse between Rome and her provinces. Moreover, stock-com-
panies, organized with wealthy Romans as shareholders, enjoyed a
high degree of development and engaged in great enterprises. From
all4:his it can be readily seen that Rome, about the end of the Republic,
afforded an immense field for banking, and we may safely conclude
that any prominent banker of that ancient city was ready to furnish
to his client almost any service or accommodation that a banker of
New York would today render under similar circumstances.
C -
**,
t of
J3 _ co
01 -
a QC
3 x~s
Q C=|
H ~' 8
w SH
Q * ?
O -8H|
O S||
M ""* C
H | g
5 fo s i
h TJ g g
o. g''^
5 o c
K box:
X
- -
VOLUME XIV
NINETEEN TWENTY
NUMBER 3
THIRD QUARTER
An
nf Notify Atnmratt
Conquest of Canada bp ttjr lurfcf Srotfcrrs, 1627=1032
BT
DOCTOR HENRY J. BERKLEY
URING the wane of the Sixteenth Century, and through
that troublous period of history when Henry of
Navarre and his son, Louis XIII, reigned over
France, there resided near the chalk cliffs of the Nor-
mandy seaport of Dieppe, a certain Gervaise Kertk
with his wife, Elizabeth, and their four stalwart sons.
The times were strenuous, Guise and Conde, Huguenot and Cath-
olic, contending for religious supremacy and the soil of France. Five
wars had already been the result of these conditions, wars that were
carried on with great cruelty on either side, but all had ended in giving
the Huguenots greater and greater liberty, with increased political
[1331
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
power to conduct themselves and their religion according to the dic-
tates of their own conscience and faith. Nevertheless, the Catholic
party continued to dominate France, especially Paris, while the
strength of the Huguenots lay in the South and along the ocean bor-
ders of the kingdom.
The Bourbons, under the Prince of Conde, afterwards under
Henry IV, supported the Calvinists ; those of the party of the Due du
Guise, the Catholics. Later, after the assassination of Conde, Henry
of Navarre, a character unique in the history of France, became the
champion of the Protestants, fought successfully numerous battles, and
finally emerged from the tempest as the ruler of the kingdom; a
brave, wise, generous and sane ruler, devoted to the welfare of his
people, eventually to fall by the hand of the insane assassin, Ravillac.
The House of Valois was sovereign over the realm for two hun-
dred and sixty years, and had given it thirteen kings, of which Henry
III was the last, none of whom had been of more than mediocre abil-
ity, but had talents to plunge the country into a succession of wars,
both internal and foreign, to the almost complete undoing of the realm.
Henry IV of Navarre saw far beyond his time and beyond the boun-
daries of his kingdom. It is recorded of him that he suggested, in
order to put an end to the eternal wars that rent Europe from one end
to the other, that the nations should send a number of delegates to a
Supreme Council, which was to regulate all matters of warfare by
arbitration. The history of the Seventeenth Century will doubtless
be repeated in the Twentieth, though the times are better prepared for
this Supreme Council for the welfare of future years than they were
in his day. The attempt to gain a permanent peace fell through, as
all the nations would not ratify the proposals, and the net result was
that wars went on as from all time, and will through all coming time,
until the millennium arrives.
Henry was also a great colonizer. During his reign Canada was
founded, and as the Jesuits were in control of the project, it was stipu-
lated in the charter that no Huguenot should settle there.
After the assassination of Henry IV, affairs of state progressed
badly for the French people. His son, Louis XIII, was a child of nine
years. Under the circumstances a regency was necessary, and the
Queen Mother, Marie de Medici, a niece of the famous Catherine,
AN EPISODE OF NORTH AMERICAN HISTORY
immediately seized the reins of government and Parliament was
ordered to be assembled. This Parliament, or States General, delib-
erated a great deal but accomplished little. The main result coming
out of its meetings was that, in the debates, Cardinal Richelieu, before
an unknown person, immediately became a marked man on account of
his eloquence and abilities. He there made such masterful addresses
"that the people began to perceive that he was a man of unusual abil-
ity" and to voice his rise as a leader.
Richelieu's chief aim was to suppress the Protestant religion, and
he called forth all the power of the realm to this end. Under his direc-
tion the siege of La Rochelle, the Calvinist stronghold of the West,
was undertaken and prosecuted to a victorious conclusion. Dieppe
also suffered but was not besieged. Shortly after the successful ter-
mination of the siege of La Rochelle (1624), the Huguenots were
finally subdued, and his "red Eminence" was master of the religions
of France as well as lord of the subjects and policies of the country.
It was during these struggles that Gervase Kertk with his wife,
Elizabeth, his sons, and a number of relatives, abandoned their homes
in Dieppe, and fled the kingdom. Nowhere was there a refuge for
Protestants, except in England ; all other countries were barred except
Holland, and the Netherlandic States had hardly recovered from the
rule of the Spaniard. Virginia had not been settled sufficiently long
to admit of the presence of a numerous colony of foreigners ; besides,
many of these people were unsuited to the rigors of a new settlement
among desolate forests and savages. Not a few overrode these bar-
riers, and ended their lives on the soil of the English colony, and some
rose to positions of eminence there.
The change to a London atmosphere, its air of freedom and per-
sonal liberty, compared to that of the continent, must have been great.
Nevertheless, memories of the expulsion from their homes lingered,
and were embittered by reports of more recent refugees who told their
tales of the final downfall of the Calvinist party in France. Their
own, as well as the struggle of other members of their faith, called
for vengeance upon their enemies, and events were quickly coming
that allowed an opportunity for the use of the spear.
The power of the Huguenots had been broken for all time by
the strength of Richelieu, who had united all the Catholic interests of
[135]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
the kingdom behind him, something that no one had been able to
accomplish before. In 1629 by the peace of Alais, the Huguenots
were granted civil equality and liberty to practice their religion, but
thereafter ceased to be a separate political party in France, and were
forbidden to emigrate to the New World. This last clause was the
direct result of the entrance of Richelieu and the Jesuits into the
affairs of New France. Religion had, since the earliest days of the
colony, been supreme there, but his Eminence added commercial to
ecclesiastic influence.
After their landing in London, the British Colonial Papers and
the minutes of the Lords of Trade and Plantations enable one to gather
glimpses of the later life of the Kertks. Gervase was well versed in
the lore of the sea and we soon find him engaged in trading with
foreign countries. He possessed sterling qualities, as well as a high
character, and soon was allowed to join some of the Merchant Com-
panies. Gradually he became a man of substance, wielding a consid-
erable influence in the affairs of the commercial world, trading in
Africa and America. In 1622-23 we find Kertk associated with Wil-
liam Alexander, Earl of Sterling, and Robert Charlton, also a Scots-
man, in a plan for the colonization of Nova Scotia. Alexander
obtained patents from King James, and sent a colony, largely composed
of his countrymen, to settle somewhere in the region of Port Royal
on the Bay of Fundy. Alexander remained there two years, until the
marriage of the Princess Henrietta Maria, sister of Louis XIII of
France to Charles I of England (1624-25), which was fathered by
Richelieu, took place, and in the subsequent adjustments Nova Scotia
was returned to the French.
To make clear the after part of this story, it is necessary to enter
shortly into the history of the maritime provinces of Canada, Acadia
as it was then called. After the discovery of the northern part of the
American Continent by Cabot, the English Government under Queen
Elizabeth claimed proprietorship of the entire region from Newfound-
land to Florida. The first grant made under these claims was in the
reign of Elizabeth, to Sir Humphrey Gilbert. It was dated 1578, and
included Newfoundland and the neighboring regions. The wording
was sufficiently vague to induce disputes of all kinds in after years.
This patent does not appear to have been made use of, as Sir
AN EPISODE OF NORTH AMERICAN HISTORY
Humphrey was shortly lost at sea. Long before this date, French and
Basque fishermen had made voyages to the Banks of Newfoundland
and the adjacent land, but did not establish themselves there. In
1534-5 Jacques Cartier made two voyages of discovery, ascending the
river Hochelaga, or Canada, to the rapids. The claims of the English
Crown were antedated many years by the erection of the arms of
France on the shores of the St. Lawrence River by Cartier, as was
the custom with European nations. About 1600 Pierre du Guast, Sieur
de Monts, and the P>aron de Potrincourt, sailed on voyages of discov-
ery to Newfoundland and the St. Lawrence regions, and, finding them
unoccupied, established a trading post and again erected the Arms of
France. In 1603, Champlain and Pontgrave sailed for the St. Law-
rence, intent upon discovery and the conversion of the Indians to the
Christian faith. It was shortly after the beginning of the Seventeenth
Century that de Potrincourt established a fort at Port Royal on
Frenchman's Bay (Bay of Fundy), La Cadia. Next, Claude de la
Tour, sieur d'Etienne, a Protestant gentleman, founded a fort near
what is now St. Johns, New Brunswick. None of these stations seem
to have been in the nature of permanent settlements, but rather to pro-
mote traffic with the Indians, obtaining the skins of sea and forest
animals, as well as other products, to be sent to Europe and sold; or it
was for the purpose of Christianizing the natives, an object on which
the French, first with the Recollet friars, later with the Jesuits, were
especially bent. The first aim for Canada, under their ruling, was of
this nature, and for nearly one hundred years afterwards trade and
religion contended for the supremacy of this northern region, some-
times commerce being foremost, sometimes religion.
The grant of James I to Sir William Alexander, though in har-
mony with the discoveries of Cabot, conflicted with the later establish-
ments of the French, and a century of warfare resulted. "First one
right was respected and then the other." Baron de Potrincourt
returned home only to be killed on the battle fields of France, and the
sieur de Monts, going back, received important commands that
absorbed his entire time. These effectually prevented him from tak-
ing an active part in the various projects for the colonization of the
new country. Claude de la Tour and his son, Charles, who had come
over to assist him in managing the affairs of the new State, were
[137]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
therefore the only ones of the originators of the enterprise that
remained in charge.
The grants to Alexander and de la Tour were amicably adjusted
by a fusion of their several interests, and after the former was recalled
to Scotland, de la Tour remained in charge of the plantations and forts.
In 1627 war was declared between France and England; the
Canadian and Nova Scotian provinces thereby becoming a fair mark
for any adventurer strong enough to overpower and control these
comparatively weak outposts of European civilization. Soon after
the declaration of war, Sir William Alexander entered into a compact
with Gervase Kirke (the name had become anglicised by this time)
and his sons to recover Nova Scotia, and incidentally conquer Canada
with it. They enlisted the services of William Barkeley, Alderman of
London, and his brother, Francis Barkeley, of Shropshire, wealthy
merchants of London, who were deeply interested in the East Indian
and Levant Mercantile Companies, the facilities of these brothers with
shipping and money being an immediate and necessary aid.
A Company of Merchant Adventurers was formed, a Royal Char-
ter obtained, and an expedition fitted out without delay, consisting of
nine vessels of all sizes. Port Royal, Cape Breton, St. Johns and the
places along the lower reaches of the St. Lawrence River were sur-
prised and reduced, and the whole of New France, with the exception
of Quebec and Hochelaga, fell into their hands. Alexander and la
Tour recovered Acadia, and, until the peace of 1632, remained in full
possession. After this treaty, the whole of Nova Scotia fell anew
into French hands. Charles de la Tour, who still remained in the
country, then found himself in an anomalous situation, his father,
Claude, whom he had sent to France for succour, having been cap-
tured on his way back by the Kirkes, now engaged on the English
side. Nevertheless, Charles remained at his post, compromised with
the French, and embraced the new order of affairs. After the declara-
tion of peace, Claude found himself in the position of a traitor to his
country, but with the assistance of Alexander managed to convey his
interest in Acadia to his son.
This restoration of Acadia forced the la Tours back to their first
allegiance, and through influence at court, Charles swung the pendulum
toward himself, obtaining a grant of land and a command under the
ruling of the French Court.
AN EPISODE OF NORTH AMERICAN HISTORY
In the meantime another dominant power had entered into the
affairs of Acadia. After the peace of St. Germain, Isaac de Razilly
was sent over to receive the surrender of the country from the agents
of Sir William Alexander. In due course of time he obtained grants
of territory in conflict with those of the la Tours. After his death
his interest was claimed by his heir, D'Aunay Charnisay, and a rivalry
began between these petty chieftains that shook Acadian life to its
centre. Richelieu favored Charnisay, and la Tour was driven to
desperate straits. Neither would acknowledge the authority of the
other. Charnisay commanded at Port Royal, while la Tour built a
stronghold at Cape Sable. They sent forays into each other's territory,
killing and capturing each other's retainers, then united against the
English, then again cut each other's throats. After a time Charnisay's
influence in France prevailed, la Tour's commission was recalled, and
his rival was ordered to take possession of his forts and plantations.
La Tour, in turn, declared himself independent of the Crown and
became a rebel. He then made overtures to Boston for assistance,
which at first was granted, and then withdrawn. Finally, Charnisay
in 1645 captured his last stronghold, St. Johns, and put to death his
captives. In 1650 he was drowned, and la Tour again obtained pos-
session of the wrecks of the province. He fortified himself in its
possession by marrying the widow of Charnisay, and incidentally
becoming the foster father of a numerous brood of children.
Acting under orders from Cromwell, Major Robert Sedgwick,
of Charlestown, in the year 1655 attacked Acadia, overcame some
slight resistance, and reduced the entire province to submission. The
Protector granted it to Sir Thomas Temple and Sir William Crowne,
with instructions to enlarge its trade and protect its fisheries. Charles
la Tour was again obliged to trim his sails, and he entered into a com-
pact with the new grantees of the territory, whereby his possessions
were insured. The course of affairs under the new administration
did not suit him, and within a few months he withdrew. As there was
nowhere else for him to go, he sailed for England, leaving a son to
administer and care for what remained of his property.
Temple and Crowne do not seem to have had a pleasant sojourn
in their new possession. Their right to the province was disputed by
the widow of Sir William Alexander, and also by the Kirkes and their
[139]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
backers, the Barkeley brothers, together and separately. The affair,
being brought to the notice of the Lords of Trade and Foreign Planta-
tions, a Committee decided that the right of Acadia lay with the
Barkeleys and Kirkes, but despite the defection of his London agent,
Temple managed to retain a hold on the province until 1667, when,
under a new treaty, Acadia was again restored to France. Thereafter
there were numerous suits in the common courts, as well as before the
Crown, which lasted until the year 1685, in which the Alexander
heirs, the Barkeleys, the Kirkes, as well as a number of other persons,
participated ; but the legal proceedings ended in the air. King Charles
did not abide by his father's Commission to the brave men who were
the founders of these English North American colonies, but rather
helped them to an eclipse of their rights under his patents. When the
King had aught to gain, they were encouraged to undertake expedi-
tions ; if, for any reason failure attended them, they were in all likeli-
hood degraded. His patents were as writing upon running waters.
Doubtless the Alexanders and Kirkes were shortsighted and narrow,
after the manner of the time, but nevertheless they belonged to the
nobility of mankind.
The Jesuits of France, during the reign of Henry IV, obtained
but slight recognition of rights in the New World. Notwithstanding
this, an alliance was formed among the Queen, Marie de Medici,
Henrietta D'Estrange, and Antoinette, Marquis de Guercheville, for
the promotion of Christianity among the American savages, under the
care of the Company of Jesus. Madame de Guercheville bought out
the interests of Mr. de Monts, a first grantee and settler of Acadia,
and obtained from the minor King, Louis XIII, letters patent for all
the territory of North American between the St. Lawrence and Flor-
ida. This writ sufficed to bring the English and French interests into
direct conflict, the former nation having already colonized Virginia
in 1606-7. At the time of the grant, Sir Thomas Dale was Governor
of the settlement. During his administration he despatched Sir
Samuel Argal in an armed brig on a combined trip for cod fishing and
determining if the French were intruding on the soil of the northern
part of the continent, in detriment to the claims of King James.
At Frenchman's Bay, on Mt. Desert Island, he discovered the
newly founded settlement of Saint Sauveur, with la Saussaye and
AN EPISODE OF NORTH AMERICAN HISTORY
Briand de Messe in command. He promptly attacked their ship, and,
being unprepared, the Frenchmen fled to the woods. Soon the pangs
of hunger compelled them to beg Argal for mercy. A number of the
party were carried to Virginia. The balance, including the Jesuit
priests belonging to it, were turned adrift, to make their way as best
they could to a refuge. Soon thereafter Argal, returning to Acadia,
completely destroyed the town of Port Royal, with all the crops and
animals, leaving Biencourt, then in command, completely stranded
until the arrival of succour from home. Not entirely discouraged, the
following year Biencourt came back and rebuilt Port Royal and its
fort. This event ends the story of Acadia to the year 1614.
In 1621 King James, "looking upon the possession of France as
an invasion," granted Acadia to Sir William Alexander, under the
name of New Scotland, and in 1622, as narrated, he planted a colony
of Scotch there.
In the years following their emigration to London, the Kirkes
appear to have prospered. The sons grew up and, with the exception
of Lewis, who remained with his father, became Masters and Cap-
tains of merchant vessels, and were also in the Royal service. The
father, as already noted, established lucrative mercantile connections
and sent ships of his own out of port, besides having warehouses for
the storage of over-sea products. It was during this time that they
established business relations with the East India and Levant Com-
panies, with Alderman William and Francis Barkeley, whose close
relations made them of much service in the furtherance of their com-
mercial interests, and whom they afterwards affiliated with them in
their plans for the conquest of New France.
With the opening of the war of 1627, the Kirkes found the long
wished for opportunity to retaliate for their mistreatment at the hands
of France and Richelieu. With the assistance of the Barkeleys, they
fitted out an expedition of nine ships, brigs and barkentines, armed
with suitable artillery. This flotilla sailed with the Royal Commission
and consent of King Charles, and was especially organized to expel
the French from the River of Canada and the Arcadian maritime
provinces. Incidently they were to gain as much booty as possible, and
established themselves in the fur trade and fisheries, and hold them
forever afterward. The personnel of the men forming this naval
[141]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
force is interesting, bearing as it does upon its ultimate motive,
revenge. The brothers, David, John and James, were commanders
of units of the fleet. David was Admiral, and under him was Captain
Michel of Sant Malo, an ardent Calvinist, and noted pilot of his day,
whose high temper induced many a wrangle with his commander.
The names of the other captains have not come down to us, but they
were probably English, representing the Barkeley interest. The
crews had but few sailors of English nationality, the larger number
being French and Basque refugees, all animated by two common pur-
poses, gain and revenge.
Sailing from London, very early in the spring, they steered a
course for Newfoundland, and on its Banks captured a considerable
number of French fishing barques, among them some from the
Basque province. Weather conditions appear to have been favorable,
and they next set their course for Cape Breton, where the ships soon
reduced the forts, incidentally capturing a large French convoy laden
with cannon and ammunition, destined for the relief of Port Royal
and Quebec. This loss was a serious one to their enemies, as it left
them without supplies of ammunition and food for at least a year,
their stocks being already depleted to the zero mark. At Cape Breton,
the Kirkes divided their forces ; a part proceeded to reduce Port Royal
and the scattered Nova Scotian settlements, while the other entered
the Gulf of the St. Lawrence River. The French nowhere appear to
have been warned in advance of the 'approach of an enemy, and seem
to have fallen an easy prey. Altogether the Kirkes captured eighteen
ships, some only fishermen's barks, but others laden with munitions
and supplies of all kinds that were valuable. These were sent back
to the port of London as prizes to be sold, and included, among other
war material, one hundred and thirty-five pieces of heavy ordnance.
Flushed with victory, they neglected to pursue their advantage to the
uttermost and bring the conquest of the provinces to an end that
season.
The remaining French posts were reduced to a desperate state by
the loss of their supplies. Charle de la Tour found means to send his
father back to France, to ask that relief might be sent, together with
sufficient armament to overcome the English forces. There he
arrived, late in the Autumn ; but for Champlain, the Commandant at
Quebec, there was no possible relief without assistance from home.
[142]
AN EPISODE OF NORTH AMERICAN HISTORY
The Northern division of the Kirkes' expedition, under Sir David
and James Kirke, entered the Gulf of St. Lawrence and proceeded to
St. Anne and Tadusac, which they reduced. There they hauled down
the Arms of France and erected those of England. In addition they
began, at the latter fort, to develop the fur-trade and protect the fish-
eries, the ultimate object of the expedition being to encourage trade,
from which they hoped to derive large profits. They expected to gov-
ern the country under Royal patents for the Company of Adventurers.
There does not appear to have been any serious resistance at any of
the river plantations or forts. The places were weak, and the forts,
designed to resist the Indians, were of little value against the cannon
of ships, being largely loop-holed palisades of wooden construction.
The accounts of the later doings of the expedition differ some-
what in detail. David Kirke, with several of the ships of his squadron,
remained at Tadusac for the combined purpose of trading and over-
awing the country, while two barques proceeded toward the upper
reaches of the St. Lawrence, to reduce the settlements on its banks.
To these new comers the deep river with its densely wooded and high
banks, with the outline of gloomy mountains in the remote distance,
must have been anything but pleasing. The utter air of desolation
that even today pervades this country must have been aught but
appealing. Stopping at Cape Tourmente, they went ashore for forage,
and after remaining a few hours proceeded on their way towards
Quebec. Finally, passing with the tide the Isle de Bacchus, now
Orleans, they anchored on a late September evening in the lower part
of the bason of Quebec, out of reach of the cannon of the citadel. The
red pennant of England was raised to the masthead, a gun was fired,
awakening the echoes of Point Levi; thence the thunder rolled back
to the headland of Quebec, from there to distant Cape Tourmente, to
be repeated again and again.
Rumours of their approach had been heralded by swift Indian
runners, and the town was filled with consternation. Champlain and
his men had through the summer months been awaiting a convoy of
French ships with guns, ammunition and provisions, especially the
last, as their supplies were at a low ebb, and here were the English at
their gates. The inhabitants crowded the wall of the citadel, eager
for yet fearful of the news. Champlain and his second in command,
[143]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
M. le Pont, held council as to what should be done on the morrow, and
agreed that they should make the best resistance possible with their
limited means. Even their fort was in a state of dilapidation, a part
of its walls having recently fallen down, but the decision was to uphold
the honor of their country, and every means of defense was made
ready.
While the town was in a ferment, the English remained quietly
at anchor awaiting the morning light, secure of their tomorrow.
Quebec was sleepless. On the ships they could hear the distant drums
and imagine the consternation that reigned within the walls.
During the night a great wind storm arose, a late September gale,
that even today is frequent at this season of the year. The ships
were buffeted and bruised in the blasts and waves of the St. Law-
rence, and as soon as the daylight was sufficient to allow of departure,
they slipped their cables and, with the strong northwest winds favor-
ing, dropped down the river, not to return again that season. Quebec
was saved for the time, though with the destruction of the relief con-
voy, the inhabitants were reduced before long to a state of extreme
misery and distress for food.
The second account narrates that Captain David Kirke and his
squadron remained at Tadusac, trading and celebrating their
exploits, while he despatched a small captured barque, filled with
Basque fishermen, to summon Champlain to surrender. On their
way up stream they stopped at Cape Tourmente, and, being French-
men, were hospitably received; but no sooner were they landed than
they began to abuse the inhabitants, kill the cattle, and fire the houses.
In the struggle that followed the commander, Foucher, escaped.
Though wounded, with two Indians, in a canoe, he made his way to
Champlain, to whom he gave the first news of the approach of a hos-
tile force. The Basques, after destroying the houses of Cape Tour-
mente, advanced to Quebec and sent a party ashore with a white flag.
There they delivered Kirke' s message to the commander, retired to
their vessel, and soon droppd down the river, disappearing in the mists.
Passing the long reaches of the desolate river they at length
arrived at Port Tadusac, on the shores of the even more solitary
Saguinay, only to learn that their commander had met with misfor-
tune. While lying at anchor in the St. Lawrence, he had been
[144]
AN EPISODE OF NORTH AMERICAN HISTORY
assailed in the early dawn of a September morning by Emery de Caen,
commanding a heavily armed pinnace laden with French and Indians.
The watch of his ships, who was either drowsy or asleep, was imme-
diately overpowered, but managed to give an alarm. For a moment
the French had possession of the deck, then the Englishmen, headed
by David Kirke, rallied and a fierce fight ensued. Kirke and his men
fought valiantly and, being a stronger force than the enemy, at
length succeeded in driving to their boat all but their captain and a
few others who still kept up the combat. Caen and Kirke engaged in
a personal duel, out of which the latter came victorious, and his fol-
lowers carried de Caen off to the pinnace. Eighteen of the English
crew lay on the deck, by the side of a number of the French forces,
and of these, two were dead. Kirke was bruised and wounded, but
not severely, and held his command, giving orders until his rule was
restored. The incident seems to have made an unhappy impression on
Kirke, who ever after nourished rancour in his heart against de Caen,
and after-events made this hatred even more bitter. Perhaps, also,
this hatred was embittered by the circumstances that, while both were
Huguenots, de Caen held posts high in the honor of France, while he
was a refugee, and from Kirke's viewpoint a traitor to his country.
Not long after this incident, the Commanders gathered their
forces together to make preparations for the return voyage. They
again overawed the inhabitants of the lower river reaches, returned
to the Saguenay, to leave the post in order for their coming the next
spring, and then towns in Cape Breton and Acadia were called upon
and consolidated. The long voyage home seems to have been made,
like their coming, without delay or accident. The home port of Lon-
don received them, along with the numerous captured vessels and
booty of all kinds they brought with them with rejoicing. Now came
the day of refitting and preparation for the campaign of 1628, during
which they hoped to consolidate all they had gained the previous year.
In one short season the Merchant Adventurers had overthrown
the entire power and treasure that France had expended on its new
Empire since the days of Jacques Cartier, almost a hundred years
before. To the Mother Country only remained Quebec and the small
settlements on the upper St. Lawrence, and these in a most deplorable
condition.
[1451
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
During that winter in London, the Company of Adventurers
again enlisted the assistance of Sir William Alexander in their venture
for the coming spring. They had reduced the Nova Scotian and Cape
Breton provinces, in which Alexander was directly interested and of
which he had been despoiled. An agreement was entered into whereby
he should be repossessed of his colony, and should in return furnish
certain moneys and political assistance.
A considerable force of land and seamen were gathered, organ-
ized and consolidated into an efficient body, and after this was com-
pleted, they sailed for Cape Breton as soon as navigation and ice
conditions permitted. Sir William Alexander went with the squadron,
and shortly thereafter we find him in the post of Governor-General
of all the country south of the St. Lawrence River. With William
Barkeley he was appointed, in addition, "Commissioners of the Gulf
and River of Canada."
La Tour had arrived in France, and had stirred Richelieu to
action by his story of the conquest of Canada and the Maritime Prov-
inces by the English. Richelieu dismissed the de Caens from his
service, as representatives of trade in the New France, organized a
"Company of an Hundred Associates," a body formed to control the
trade of this region and, with the assistance of the Jesuits, to Chris-
tianize the Indians. A squadron of four ships under the Admiral of
the Company, de Roquemond, was assembled at Dieppe and sailed in
the early spring for the relief of Quebec. Claude de la Tour accom-
panied it. Early as they were in departing, the English were ahead
of them and in superior force, under the command of David, John and
James Kirke, with Michel as pilot.
On arriving at the Road of Gaspe, de Rochemond despatched a
barque to advise Champlain that supplies were at hand, also to carry
to him a Commission from the King as Governor of New France.
This convoy also carried orders to procure an inventory of all the
effects of the de Caens in Canada, and expel them. It would appear
that they had abused their authority ; besides, they were Calvinists and
therefore objectionable to Richelieu. This vessel was captured. Not
many days thereafter, de Roquemont learned that the English squad-
ron was not far distant, and with more valor than discretion, he imme-
diately weighed anchor and set forth in search of them. Unfortunately,
AN EPISODE OF NORTH AMERICAN HISTORY
his heavily laden vessels were not only incapable of manceuvering as
well as those of the Kirkes, but were inferior in force.
As soon as the English flotilla sighted the squadron under de
Rochemond, they cleared for action. For a while there was a fierce
conflict with considerable carnage on both sides, but by superior
manceuvering the English soon disabled the rigging of their oppo-
nents, compelling them to strike. De Rochemond and de la Tour were
made prisoners, and at the first opportunity sent to England.
An interesting echo of this combat is found in the annals of the
Recollet Friars of Canada. It appears that in the vanquished squadron
were a considerable number of this order. Neither the Kirkes nor
their Protestant sailors looked upon the members of any monastic
order with eyes of favor. As soon as possible after the battle, they
packed them into a small merchant ship, which they had seized, and
sent them back to Europe. The poor friars, returning after a lost
voyage, experienced not only the rigors of a second one in confined
quarters, but when they neared the coast of Spain, were captured by
Moroccan pirates. Then their new masters were in turn attacked by
some Spanish frigates, and vanquished ; and finally they were landed
at "Bayonne en Espagne," whence they were allowed to return to their
former homes. It would seem more than doubtful, after all these
hardships, if any of them ever wished to see the billows of the ocean
again. In return for the insults they received, the narrative refers to
the Kirkes and the English as "Basque pirates."
In 1631 the Kirke brothers, with the exception of Lewis, who
accompanied the squadron in the capacity of civilian, were knighted,
and were granted the "Coat-armour of Mons. Rockmond to them and
to their issue forever, for valor in vanquishing the French fleet under
the command of Mons. de Rockmond and bringing him prisoner to
England."
With the total defeat of their succouring ships, the hopes of the
French in Canada vanished. Nowhere in Nova Scotia or Canada was
there sufficient force to oppose their enemies, and those that survived
were stricken by famine and disease. One small hope remained for
the commander of Quebec, but of that he was unaware. A single
barkentine had followed the squadron of de Rochemont, laden with
provisions and war material. It passed into the St. Lawrence, then
[147]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
past Tadusac, where the English lay, in a dense fog, and those on
board were rejoicing in their escape when the bark of John Kirke bore
down upon them. A sharp cannonade ensued, the echoes reverberating
from one hill to another on the north bank of the stream, where the
noise of civilized warfare had never resounded before, and drew all
the natives within hearing to its banks. Again, by more adroit
maneuvering, Kirke won the advantage of position and the fight was
soon over, the barkentine surrendering with its complement.
John, James and Lewis Kirke sailed up the river on the tide to
Quebec. Again the thunders of the main were awakened and re-
echoed from the headland to Cape Tourmente. Again the red pennant
of England floated at the mast head. Landing at Point Levi, Thomas
Kirke sent an officer with a flag of truce to summon Champlain and
the Citadel to surrender. Champlain, reduced to dire necessity, wel-
comed them in his heart rather as friends than enemies, but resolved
to put up the best bluff possible and obtain the best terms for himself
and his men. The past months had been difficult ones for the com-
mander and his garrison. He had contemplated a foray into the
Iroquois country for food, but was obliged to give the project up on
^account of lack of a proper supply of ammunition. For weeks the
garrison had been reduced to roots and scanty supplies of fish. So
extreme had their state become that it is said that the English sailors
found only a single barrel of sour roots in the fortress, the total supply
of provender for the entire garrison.
To the demands of the officer sent by Captain Kirke, Champlain
required (i) "that he show his commission from the King of Great
Britain, and his powers to treat from his brother, David, who
remained at Tadusac," a demand that seems to have been observed
rather in the breach than in the observance; (2) that he be allowed "a
ship to take all his Company back to France, friars, Jesuits, two sav-
ages, also weapons, baggage;" (3) "to have sufficient victuals in
exchange for skins to provision the people of Quebec;" (4) "to be
allowed favorable treatment for all;" (5) "to allow the ship a stay of
three days at Tadusac to permit the assemblage of all who desired
to return to their own country." The final terms allowed by the
English Commander-in-Chief were so favorable that, in place of a
wholesale eviction, practically all elected to remain, and were allowed
SIKTU I'K I. A SA1.I.K
The famous French-American pathfind-T who did no much to blaze th- w.iy through Canada and
th- Mississippi Valley, which afterward.* t>.- 1 -;iiii- |,:ut 1.1 Hi" rnli.-d St.u >t:ttu.- .l-slgned
by l.nuis Cuil>-lin>il. .sculptor.
AN EPISODE OF NORTH AMERICAN HISTORY
to pursue their avocations unhampered. They were further given the
assurance that if they did not like the English rule, after the lapse of
a year, all were free to return to France, and that passage would be
afforded them. Furthermore, most of the plebiscite of the town fra-
ternized freely with the sailors of the squadron, many being compa-
triots. It is a notable comment on English rule, the rule even of those
days, that practically none of them eventually returned. Had they
done so there would have been little more open to them in France than
the lives of mendicants and dependents. War does not seem to have
been prosecuted in the days of the early Seventeenth Century on the
same basis as it is today, and the rights of the individual were respected
in every possible way by the English after the heat of combat had
subsided.
Champlain and a few of his principals were sent, first to Tadusac,
where he was royally entertained by Sir David Kirke, and afterwards
to England. There he was hospitably received and means were soon
afforded him to continue his journey to his own country. He
remained under the patronage of Richelieu until the treaty of St. Ger-
main afforded him an opportunity to return to Canada, again in the
position of Commander-in-Chief .
Champlain seems to have had a religious, rather than a com-
mercial instinct, and this grew in intensity as he became older. His
aim, therefore, became rather the conversion of the savages to Chris-
tianity than the cultivation and development of the resources of the
land. He did not live sufficiently long to see the outcome of his policy,
but died three years after his return. His memory remains, if not
the most, at least one of the very foremost figures in Canadian colonial
history, and will ever be remembered as one of its honored dead.
Shortly after the capture of Quebec, Sir Lewis Kirke received
the appointment of Governor of all the northernmost provinces, while
Sir William Alexander returned to his former charge, now extended
by the inclusion of Cape Breton and the whole of the Nova Scotian
provinces. There, in order to promote tranquility, he again fused his
interests with those of Charles de la Tour, and even made him a
marquis of Nova Scotia, a right that he had received from the King.
Considerable sums of money were expended, emigrants were settled,
St. Johns, Port Royal, and the Cape Breton plantations were encour-
aged, and the future looked most promising.
[153]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
In Canada Sir Lewis Kirke, who seems to have been endowed
with good administrative abilities, ruled the province wisely and for
the benefit of all. Trade with the Indians was promoted, traffic with
Europe in skins and fish was enlarged, and the seal industry was
ordered. David and John, "the men of war," returned to England
to advance the interests of their Company, while James and the other
marine commanders under him were employed in the coast settlements
in keeping off any chance raider, not alone the occasional French but
Englishmen also, of whom several had been guilty of piratical forays.
It was an era of reconstruction and advancement, and their enterprise
flourished.
For three years the Company of Adventurers remained in undis-
puted possession. Then came the unexpected treaty of 1632-3, return-
ing to France all of her possessions in North America. The consum-
mate skill and diplomacy of Richelieu outweighed any right the Royal
Commission afforded to the Adventurers' Company. A stroke of the
pen was greater than years of hard and valiant toil and undid all their
work, as well as the expenditure, for those days, of vast sums of
money. At the Royal word the claims of the Alexanders, the Barke-
leys, the Kirkes, were disregarded and set at naught. Commissioners
were appointed by France both for Nova Scotia and Canada, and, on
their arrival at Quebec, Lewis Kirke had the pleasure of surrendering
the reins of government to the enemy of his house, Emery de Caen.
Everything was given up in accordance with the royal command, and
seemingly without hestitation.
The privileges and royal grants were forgotten by Charles, and
afterwards slight compensation was returned to the London Company.
Sir William Alexander fared equally badly, and for the second time
his provinces of Nova Scotia went back to the French, though not to
the first grantees.
In the confused account of claims and counter claims, appeals to
the Lords of Trade and Plantations, appeals to the Crown for a restor-
ation of some of their lost properties, ships, forts and expenditures,
claims against the French that were never satisfied, claims that by
the treaty should have been met with strict compliance, we discover
that Charles was not entirely devoid of all sense of responsibility, and
to a slight extent did afford the Company means, through the agency
[154]
AN EPISODE OF NORTH AMERICAN HISTORY
of the English ambassador at Versailles, to present their case at court.
Nothing substantial ever came out of it ; but he did grant some of the
Kirkes certain privileges in northern Canada and Newfoundland that
further embroiled them with their enemies.
Under the treaty of St. Germain-en-Laye, the provinces of Acadia
and the south bank of the St. Lawrence River were returned to
France. That the north bank was not mentioned showed just how
thoroughly Richelieu and his associates were interested in the Colony ;
also that their principal aim was not colonization, but the expulsion of
the English from the American continent. To surround them on the
north and west afforded a means at some future time to expel them
entirely. This omission of mention of the upper bank of the river
immediately gave rise to a further complication of the already com-
plicated affairs of Canada. Under the terms of the treaty, the asso-
ciates of the Kirkes agreed to return the kingdom they had conquered,
and punctually performed their part of the contract. In accordance
with their peaceful withdrawal, they were to receive compensation to
the amount of 9,000, but this was never paid, the agent of Louis XIII,
though repeatedly admonished by the Barkeleys, never fulfilling the
agreements. Richelieu and his successor, Marazin, perhaps disdained
to complete a contract made with Calvinists, who were also regarded
as traitors to their country. The de Caens evidently thought this way,
even though they were Protestants.
Charles did attempt some redress. "In 1633 tne King taking
notice that though the forts were to be delivered to the French, the
English were not to be excluded from trade in those regions (the St.
Lawrence Gulf and north bank of the river), in May, in consideration
of the 50,000 laid out by the Company of Merchant Adventurers, on
the fort of Quebec and other fortifications on the St. Lawrence, and
of the ready obedience in resigning the same at his command, granted
to Sir Lewis and his brother, John Kirke, for thirty-one years, not
only for trade in the river of Canada, but to build forts and plant
colonies where they should think fit." By virtue of this Commission,
they in 1633 sent the ship, Good Fortune, laden with goods to these
parts, where she was seized, by a certain Captain Bontempts, carried
to Dieppe, France, and confiscated "to the value of 12,000, and
though John Kirke and Lord Scudamore, the English Ambassador,
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
urged that the monies due to them for the ship and lading might be
restored, they could obtain nothing" and ever afterwards the claim
remained unsettled. There were also reprisals, on the part of the
French, for vessels captured before the war had ended in 1632. The
Admiral of the Company of an Hundred Associates, William de Caen,
came to London and attempted to recover a cargo of beaver pelts,
which had been stored in a ware-house belonging to Gervase Kirke.
Sharp and acrimonious legal proceedings resulted. The Company was
ordered to make restitution. It refused to restore them, and finally it
took the entire power of the civil Courts to oblige it to surrender the
goods. Even the Lord Mayor of London had his authority in the mat-
ter disputed. Finally the doors of the warehouse were broken in, and
the Company surrendered. De Caen then received his pelts and
removed them to France.
When the London Company vacated New France, they estimated
that they had spent upwards of 60,000 in the venture. How much it
had yielded them in the way of captured vessels and cargoes, the
return from their three years' control of the fur and other trades, is
not given in the records, but the sum must have been very large. The
French in the St. Germain treaty agreed to pay back to the Company
9,000, presumably for additions to the forts and plantations in Acadia
and Canada, but, as above mentioned, this was not settled. This figure
may have represented the difference between the debt and credit side
of the venture, or may have been an arbitrary amount given them for
their "peaceful withdrawal."
Beginning with 1633, and up to the year 1685, petition after peti-
tion was sent in to the Crown and Lords of Trades and Plantations.
Both acknowledged the justice of the appeals and a Commission was
appointed for deciding the controversy, but the inquiry did not result
in anything. Finally, in 1685, the last prayers of the survivors of the
Company, Francis Barkeley and James Kirke, were heard; then fol-
lows a blank as to further proceedings on the records.
The fate of the several members of the Company of Adventurers
of Canada is not devoid of interest. Alderman Barkeley, after pro-
longed and acrimonious litigation with the widow of Claude de la
Tour, died and was buried in Bishopsgate about the year 1650. The
litigation concerned conflicting claims in Acadia and Massachusetts.
[156]
AN EPISODE OF NORTH AMERICAN HISTORY
Sir William Alexander and his son never forgot their love for Nova
Scotia, and joined with the La Tours in a kind of sovereignty over it,
broken later by a renewal of the French pretensions, shortly after
Cromwell's death. Except in the claims, James Kirke's name is not
again mentioned, and he probably returned to and died in England.
Gervase Kirke died in London about 1640, and was survived some
years by his widow, Elizabeth.
Sir David Kirke was sent to Newfoundland in the capacity of
governor of the Colony in 1633, and among his duties was to protect
the fisheries from the French ; a fertile source of disputes. For over
an hundred years, Basque and Breton fishermen, in numbers, had fre-
quented the Banks of Newfoundland, and after taking their catches,
had dried and salted them upon certain parts of the shores of the
island, especially Placentia Bay, which seems to have been a common
meeting ground for all the fishermen. Kirke was commissioned to
prevent them from practicing a custom founded on the precedent of
many years.
In epilogue : As already stated, "New Foundland was the earliest
of the English Crown grants in North America. Sir Humphrey Gil-
bert obtained a concession from Queen Elizabeth in 1578, which was
not availed of and became vacant until 1602," when Sir Francis Bacon
and associates received a charter from King James, which likewise
after a time fell into abeyance. In 1620, Sir George Calvert, after-
wards Lord Baltimore, patented a tract of land on the Island known
as Aviland or Avalon. There he erected a mansion house, oversaw
the fisheries, built boats and landings, and for a time lived in what
was approximately a feudal state. Eventually tiring of the lonesome-
ness of these desolate regions, he abandoned his house and the colon-
ists that he had brought with him to their own devices, and returned
home. As there was little else to do, most of those remaining lived on
the trade of the foreign fishermen, and supplied them with spirits and
other luxuries, we fear, to too great an extent, as from time to time
came back reports of dissolute life in the plantation of Aviland. Cal-
vert seems to have left his colony previous to the year 1637-8, for at
that date we find a grant from King Charles to "James, Marquis of
Hamilton, Philip, Earl of Pembroke, Henry, Earl of Holland, and
Sir David Kirke," of the entire Island of Newfoundland, a paper still
[157]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
in existence among the Calvert papers, now owned by the Maryland
Historical Society, and giving the full details of the patent. It recites,
in brief, "that George, Lord Baltimore, having left the Plantation in
no sort provided for: Cecil, his heir, having also deserted it, as have
several others who had grants of parcels of land, leaving divers of
poor inhabitants without government, this grant was made at the
humble petition of the above."
Kirke settled at Aviland in 1638, dispossessing one William Gill,
who represented Lord Baltimore, of his house and appurtenances on
the Plantation. He does not appear to have made an exemplary Gov-
ernor. Complaint was made, soon after his introduction into the
office, of "the many tippling houses and taverns that were created by
him to his own advantage, which was the first cause of debauching
the seamen and the inhabitants increase." As noted, Kirke was not
the first delinquent in this respect and he possibly followed only in
the path of his predecessors.
After the death of George, the first Lord Baltimore, "Cecil his
heir" did not propose to submit tamely to the usurpation of his rights
in the plantation of Aviland. First to the Protector, Cromwell, later
to Charles II, he addressed petitions in which he relates that his father
built a fort and house, in which he resided, and spent upwards of
30,000 in perfecting his claims as well as bringing over colonists;
also that Charles I would never listen to his prayers. He further
recites that "in 1637, Sir David Kirke surreptitiously obtained a
patent, went over the following year, and dispossessed the petitioner
of all his rights." "In 1655 (Kirke being the sole survivor of the
grantees) made over a part of his rights to John Claypole, son-in-law
to Oliver Cromwell, Colonel Rich, Colonel Goffe, and others, and Sir
Lewis and others are endeavoring to get a confirmation of that
patent." "He prays that no grant may be passed to his prejudice, and
his rights restored." Sometime later, about 1658, Sir David Kirke
returned to England, was arrested by order of Lord Baltimore and
imprisoned on the charge of having confiscated his Aviland estates.
English prisons at this time were anything but healthy, and Kirke
soon died "without satisfying the claims of the Lord Baltimore."
Some years afterward, in another petition to the Crown, he naively
rejoices that he has brought an honorable and valiant man to an
[158]
AN EPISODE OF NORTH AMERICAN HISTORY
untimely end, adding that, unfortunately, his imprisonment and death
did not suffice to fulfil his claim upon him. In 1663 Charles II issued
an order "to all Commanders, Captains and all subjects in Newfound-
land, to Sir Lewis Kirke, John Kirke, and the heirs of Sir David
Kirke to deliver all houses and lands in Avalon to Cecil, Lord Balti-
more," and the controversy ended. After the death of Sir David, his
sons, George, David, and Philip, succeeded him and were residents of
Newfoundland, and in 1680 were described in a petition to a commis-
sion, called to settle the fisheries question, as "able men of estate,"
who would be capable advisors as to the fisheries, the destruction of
the forests by fire, and means of remedying these abuses.
A single further item of interest is to be found in the records
of the later career of John Kirke, who continued to live in Newfound-
land. In 1661 he and Thomas Kellond were sent by the King to
search for Colonels Whalley and Goffe, the regicides, who had
escaped from Old England to New England. Governor Endicott was
ordered to afford them every facility to prosecute the search, and fur-
nish them passage as well as passports to the several governors and
commanders through whose territory they might wish to pass. They
did trace the fugitives into Rhode Island, then into Connecticut.
There the regicides appear to have received sustenance and succour
from friends, who finally passed them into the Dutch territory of'
Manhattan, thence over the Hudson into the unknown land to the
west, among whose forests and lakes they were finally lost sight of
forever. One cannot think that Kirke pursued the search with avid-
ity, but rather in a half-hearted manner, and his report to Governor
Endicott, dated May 29 of the same year, does not portray a whole
heart. Kirke was possibly acquainted with Goffe in England or New-
foundland, where he had purchased land that afterwards was returned
to Lord Baltimore.
A curious incident concerning Goffe occurred during the middle
part of the reign of Charles I, when the times were vexatious and dis-
senters from the royal way of thinking were suffering persecution.
Oliver Cromwell, nephew of Sir Oliver Cromwell, who was one of the
members of the Virginia Company, together with Goffe and Whalley,
planned, in their desperation at the unwholesome outlook for religious
and political freedom in England, to turn their footsteps to the new
[159]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
world. They assembled a party of followers and co-religionists,
engaged a ship to carry them, and were about to sail for a haven of
peace and religious rest in Virginia. An exodus to the colony had
lately begun, fomented by the same reasons that were urging them
away, and the matter was brought to the attention of the King, who
ordered that no one be allowed to sail without passports from the
proper authorities. Cromwell and his associates were on board their
vessel, ready to depart to the colony, when they were ordered to return
to London. After a delay of several days, during which petitions
were made for relief, this command was complied with; they separ-
ated, and went to their several homes. Thus the destiny of an entire
nation was altered by a single seemingly unimportant mandate. It
may well be that those of Virginia might also have suffered a total
change, had Cromwell been allowed to sail as he intended doing.
Bacon's rebellion might readily have been that of Gof f e and Cromwell,
and an epoch-making event in England, which has altered the condition
of the Anglo-Saxon race for all time on this planet, would never
have taken place.
An aftermath of the days of the Kirkes is found in the history of
Nova Scotia. In 1654-5, after the English fleet had reduced New
Amsterdam, a part of it proceeded to Nova Scotia, and there, acting
with a body of New Englanders, proceeded to expel the French author-
ities. After this had been accomplished, they left Sir Thomas Temple
and William Crowne in control of the government of the maritime
provinces. Charles de la Tour made his peace with the new authority,
but withdrew after a few months, departing in disgust. Temple and
Crowne soon were at daggers' points. They separated. The trade of
the country was divided between them, Temple assuming the Penob-
scott region, and Crowne that of the River Damarche, otherwise
Machias Bay, and the territory contiguous to it. Trouble soon arose
between Temple and his London agent, a man by the name of Elliott,
who proved unfaithful to his trust. Temple petitioned the King in
1668 for redress, alleging that he was now old as well as feeble, and
had spent all his substance in promoting and caring for his Majesty's
colony, also that the revenues were insufficient to keep him in ordinary
estate, and should he be dispossessed of them, he would have nothing
whereon to live. His management seems to have been bad, and when
[160]
AN EPISODE OF NORTH AMERICAN HISTORY
several other disputes arose in which he was directly concerned, an
order was issued by the Crown, February, 1669, tnat ne be dispos-
sessed of the province, and the French, to whom Acadia had recently
been restored in accordance with the treaty of Breda, assumed control
there. Peace, such as it was among a population long inured to petty
warring upon each other, now followed, and lasted until the year
1710, when another series of events began which have no connection
with this story.
[161]
A (Eohmtal praidj? r attb patriot
COLONEL A. A. POMEROY
ERE lies the body of the Rev. Benjamin Pomeroy, D. D.,
Minister of the First Church of Hebron, and a Trus-
tee of Dartmouth College. Native of Suf field. Ob.
Dec. 2 ist, 1784; aged 81. For Fifty Years a Zealous
Preacher of the Gospel, and eminently successful
about 1743- A Patron of learning, a firm and active
Pastor, and a Friend to the distressed/' Epitaph on his tombstone at
Hebron, Connecticut.
"Along the gentle slope of life's decline
He bent his gradual way,
Till full of years he drops,
Life's mellow fruit, into the grave."
The Reverend Benjamin Pomeroy, son of Joseph Pomeroy and
the latter's wife, Hannah Seymour, (who was the daughter of Richard
Seymour, Jr., of Hartford, Connecticut), grandson of Deacon Medad
Pomeroy and his wife, Experience Woodward, of Northampton, Mas-
sachusetts, and great-grandson of Eltweed Pomeroy and his wife,
Margery Rockett, founders of the Pomeroy family in America, was
born at Suffield, then in Massachusetts, but later incorporated with
Connecticut, November 19, 1704, and was thus, "so far as appears
the oldest at graduation of any of the students [Yale College] com-
memorated in this volume." [Barber's Historical Collections.}
He resided at Yale College a year after graduation, as one of
the first scholars on Dean Berkeley's foundation, receiving as the
income therefrom 16. He seems at the same time to have prosecuted
the study of theology, as he began to preach in 1 734 in Hebron, Con-
necticut, where he was ordained pastor, December 16, 1735. Soon
after the great religious revival of 1740 began, he identified himself
with the movement, and thenceforth labored abundantly to promote it.
A COLONIAL PREACHER AND PATRIOT
In June, 1742, after the law had been passed for correcting dis-
orders in preaching, Mr. Pomeroy was accused before the General
Assembly of disorderly conduct at Stratford, in company with his
friend, James Davenport (Yale College, 1732), and was brought to
Hartford for trial, but was dismissed by the Assembly as having been
comparatively blameless. A summons was again issued by the
Assembly, October, 1743, commanding his appearance to answer to
charges of violation of law. Accordingly, he appeared at the next
session, in May, 1744, was found guilty and compelled to bear the
costs of the prosecution. He also, about this time, preached in the
neighboring parish of Colchester without the leave of the resident
minister and was in consequence deprived of his salary for several
years.
The Reverend Doctor Timothy Cooley, of Granville, Massachu-
setts, said in conversation with Banjamin Pomeroy, of Stonington.
Esq., in 1850: "After personal contact with George Whitfield your
grandfather accepted the new teachings and thenceforth his opinions
and preaching were much influenced by them." Alluding to the
suspension from the ministry for preaching in another parish con-
trary to the wishes of the resident clergyman, he said: "Your grand-
father said : 'Sir, those seven years that I was deprived of my stated
salary were the most fruitful years of my ministry;' for he went up
and down country and wherever he found two men and a hay-stack he
had a pulpit and a congregation and he proclaimed the Gospel to them."
"The late Doctor Pomeroy and his brother-in-law, Doctor
Wheelock, were the first who received the interest of the legacy given
by Reverend Dean Berkeley to the best classical scholars of the senior
class in Yale College." * * "Samson Occum, the celebrated
Indian preacher, lived a year with Doctor Pomeroy studying Latin and
Greek." [Life of Wheelock, 1811.]
His marriage to the sister of his classmate, Doctor Wheelock,
caused his active interest in the establishment of the Indian Charity
School and its successor, Dartmouth College. In the summer of 1766
he took a journey to consult Sir William Johnson as to the best place
for building the future college; and in 1770 he accompanied Doctor
Wheelock on the visit to Hanover, New Hampshire, which finally
determined the site. He was named as one of the original trustees of
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
the college and continued in office till his death. The same college
conferred upon him the degree of Doctor of Divinity in 1774.
For more than a year before his death, Doctor Pomeroy was
entirely blind. He died December 22, 1784, and a sermon preached
soon after his death by his son-in-law, the Reverend David McClure
(Yale College, 1769), was printed.
The Reverend Samuel A. Peters (Yale, 1757), who was born
and bred in Hebron, Connecticut, wrote of him in 1781 as "an excel-
lent scholar, an exemplary gentleman, and a most thundering preacher
of the New light order." The Reverend Benjamin Trumbull (Yale,
1759), who was also brought up under Doctor Pomeroy's preaching,
describes him as a "man of real genius, grave, solemn and weighty in
his discourses, which were generally well composed and delivered with
a great deal of animation, zeal and affection. He might be reckoned
among the best preachers of his day."
Another parishioner, the Reverend David Porter (Dartmouth,
1784), wrote of him in 1848: "He possessed considerable native talent
and more than ordinary attainments in literature and science. Nor
was he less distinguished for wit and sarcasm. At the commencement
of hostilities between the American Colonies and Great Britain, he
showed himself a warm friend to the cause of Independence."
Benjamin Pomeroy published nothing, but some of his letters
found the way into print, among them one written to Sir William
Johnson in 1762, in the "Documentary History of New York," Volume
IV, Page 316.
It was in March, 1758, that he was appointed Chaplain of the
Third Connecticut regiment; and in March, 1759, Chaplain of the
Fourth Connecticut, of which his son, Benjamin, Jr., had been
appointed Surgeon.
It is due to the careful methods of his descendants, Mrs. Henry
Thorp Bulkley ( Rebecka Wheeler Pomeroy, a former Secretary of the
Pomeroy Family Association), and Mrs. Brooks Hughes Wells (Mary
Frances Pomeroy), of New York City, that the present writers is
enabled to present a series of characteristic letters written by Doctor
Pomeroy from the seat of war, to his wife.
In 1757 Doctor Pomeroy was at Fort Edward as Chaplain to the
Connecticut troops in the French War. The earliest letter from him
A COLONIAL PREACHER AND PATRIOT
in my possession is dated "Camp Fort Edward, Sept. 10, 1757," and
was to Mrs. Abigail Pomeroy at Hebron, Connecticut. It follows :
CAMP FORT EDWARD, "Sept. 10, 1757.
My dear :
I am through unmerited mercy so far recovered that I hope to per-
form publick exercize tomorrow. I long to hear from you. I trust
you will improve every opportunity to let me know your affairs, & how
you do, & how it is with our dear little lambs our family & People. It
is, I believe generally expected the most of our provincials will soon
be dismissed, we hear four regiments of Regulars are come to Albany.
Yesterday arrived here from No. 4 Lieut. Walker with 12 men.
Informs me that Col. Whiting & his party have been remarkably
healthy this summer, have lost but one man & he a few days ago, by
the accidental discharge of one of the N. Hampshire men's pieces, that
the Col. expected soon to be released from that place &c. But the part
of our regiment stationed here tho distingstd by divine care above any
of the Provincials have yet lost about 60 men, mostly by sickness, but
are now much more healthy. I trust you will acquaint Eleazer with
these Hints if he be safely arrived. Benjamin is a little better, has not
been confined, or hindered from business at all. we hope his indisposi-
tion may pass off lightly, but how long he may escape God only knows.
Oh that we might be wholly resigned to his will. Corporal Pomeroy
whom I mentioned in another letter, is I hope mending tho' Ive heard
nothing today. Cousin Dan Pomeroy, I heard a day or two ago was
like to do well. I am with kindest Salutation to you, our dear children
&c. your true, constant, & Loving husband BENJM POMEROY.
P. S. Our stay is like to be so short Eleazer may omit to send my
Concordance and Preaching Bible until further orders. I believe
papers will be a good article. Candles such as you my dear used to
make for winter store would do extremely well.
Mrs. Abigail Pomeroy, Hebron, Conn.
LAKE GEORGE Jul 23d 1759.
My dear:
Saturday last at break of day, our troops to the number of 12,000
embarked for Cabrillous all in health & high spirits. I co'd wish for
more appearance for Dependance on God than was observable amongst
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
them yet I hope God will Grant Deliverance unto Israel by them.
Mr. Beebe & I, by ye advice of our Col. stay behind but expect soon to
follow. A considerable number of Sick are left here in Hospitals,
Five died last ni[ht.
Capt. Ichabod Phelps is stationed at Fort Millar. I saw him and
my neighbor Feulding a week ago. Mr. Chamberlin's son is here in
ye Hospital but mending. I have been in general as well as when at
home, want very much to hear from you, our dr. children &c. the
People & neighboring ministers &c. how does our son Gillet & dau. and
son Ralph will they not write to me? I wd mention, wod time permit
me to describe it The affecting scene of last Friday morning. A poor
wretched Criminal Thos Bailey was executed. Mr. Brainard & myself
chiefly discoursed with him but almost all his care was to have his life
prolonged, pleaded with us to intercede with ye General for him, but
there was no prospect of succeeding, his crime was stealing, or Rob-
bing, whereof he had been frequently guilty, once rec'd 100 lashes, &
once reprieved from ye gallows, but being often reproved he still hard-
ened his heart, & was suddenly destroy'd. Several prayers were made
at ye place of execution the poor creature was terrified even to
amazement & distraction at ye approach of ye King of Terrors. An
Eternity of sinful pleasure would be dear bought with the pains of ye
last two hours of his life. He struggled with His Executioner, I
believe more than an hour ere they could put him in any proper posi-
tion to receive the shot the Capt. of ye guard told me since that he
verily believed that the devil helped him. I was far from thinking so
yet his resistance was very extraordinary.
July 21, 1759. For want of time my dear I send enclosed to
Dr. Whalock a brief & imperfect journal from ye 3d inst to this pres-
ent date, which please to open & read & send to him. The wind is
now fair. I am just going to Embark for Carvillous. I want to hear
more particularly from you, have any of our people gone to ye
Eternal world &c. I wod have wrote you before had I opportunity ~
I am with increasing love and affection My Dr.
Your most affectionate loving husband
BENJ. POMEROY.
A COLONIAL PREACHER AND PATRIOT
Mrs. Abigail Pomeroy, Hebron, Conn.
CROWN POINT Sept. 24th 1759.
My dear son :
Were I to spend an hour with you in my study next to enquir-
ing your health, improvement in learning, Religion &c. I'd be propos-
ing methods to accomplish you in the best & easiest way for the public
business, divine providence seems to point out wherein to your intro-
duction duly qualified, and discharging to God's honour, and accept-
ance, the good of mankind and your own true peace is truly one of the
brightest prospects respecing myself & family that yet buoy up the
sinking spirits of your Father on this side the eternal world, lliis
sun eclipsed, clouded sullied &c especially through any want of appli-
cation prudence or steadiness in you, would, cast a dismal gloom all
around. But I hope the caveat unnecessary, however considering the
mighty temptations of the day tis paternal kindness to give it. There
are my son no insuperable difficulties in the way to your improvement,
both the importance that young men designed for public service,
should be well accomplished, and the way thereto lie more open to
me now, than ever before, had some few things been recommended &
pressed upon me & means of attending to them been afforded 25 years
ago the influence into my usefulness, as well as comfort has been
happy beyond account. But for want of some such preparation my
life is in a measure thrown away. Reap you my son this benefit, from
your Fathers misfortune to learn a lesson which otherwise experience
and reflection will lecture upon too late. Accuracy in orthography is
of more importance than you can well imagine. I learn the worth of
it by the want of it. Your present situation may perhaps favor your
importance in this, and it must be done by Patience & Painstaking.
Never make use of your pen in a hurry if it can be avoided.
I'll say nothing of oratory now, hoping shortly to see you, which
failing, may the good Lord provide you a better guide & be to you
more than my fondest wishes can represent.
In the mean time remember &c.
B. POMEROY.
The next is a letter to the Reverend Eleazer Wheelock, his wife's
brother.
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
CROWN POINT Oct. 8, 1759.
Dearest Brother
Yours of Sept. 29 as it would have been acceptable at any time
was peculiarly so last Saturday evening as I was parting with two
very dear brethren Messrs. Brainerd & Forbes who went yesterday
morning with about 300 invalids for Albany but they both in health
both salute you Kindly. Mr. Brainerd is forward to support the
school but I fear will be able to do nothing at Albany for its not
probable Mr. Ogelive is returned. I hope he will write you from
Albany but if not soon after he gets home. Majr Rogers has been out
about 25 days with 200 men, 30 days provisions. We heard little from
him that can be relyed on. Know not his destination tis said Genl . . .
has positive orders from Genl Amherst to proceed directly to Montreal
but Im not satisfyed of ye truth of it. tis expected ye Genl & main
body of Regular troops with ye new Brig Sloops & other vessels of
force will sail down ye lake very soon, tomorrow I suppose is the day
appointed for embarking. But none of ye Provinsial troops are
appointed. The weather is & generally has been favorable to our busi-
ness being pretty dry and as warm as summer. If you was to see our
garden which has been mostly made since our arrival youd imagine it
May or June no frost having yet touchd ye tenderest plants. I thank
you for ye care you take to inform of ye state of my family & very
heartily condole ye afflicted circumstances of any branches of yours,
if you have opportunity represent me to 'em as sharing their sorrow.
Ive taken a good deal of pains to get a later act. of Dear Cousin
Phelp's state but after all my hope is an expiring taper. Sergt Mack
is informed she was just alive 25th Sept. The post came thro' Hebron
was at Hosfords when he took his letters ye 27th, but can give no
act. of Mrs. Phelps. Does not know yt. ee heard anything about her.
He brought me no letter from my own family or any body in Hebron.
Bro. Leavenworth only is with me now. he sends kind salutation. I
hear Col. Wooster & Regt are ordered here & perhaps on ye march.
Can you think of any body who might be obtained to preach ye
Thanksgiving to my people if I should not come home soon eno? I
return kind salutation to Dr Sister Whalock, yr dear family &c, & am
much as ever your Brother
BENJA POMEROY.
[168]
A COLONIAL PREACHER AND PATRIOT
P. S. Oct. 1 2th. The post has waited for ye Embarkation for
St Johns which began yesterday afternoon & was finished by Day-
light they are about 5000 in number, no provincials except small drafts
of Sailors, oarsmen &c. Theyeve had a very favorable night this
morning looks a little threatening. As I trust you will remember
them all in your prayers, so I would bespeak a particular regard to my
son Eleazer who has gone with them.
Oct. 13. The weather is tempestous this morning. Ill boding to
our troops but God whose thots & ways are above our may mean it
for good. I fear the Posts long delay will rob you of ye little satisfac-
tion you might have had from ye above imperfect sketch of news,
which I can not always remidy, or compensate but by keeping my
letter open to let you hear from me as late as I can.
Oct. 14. Ye post is going in a hurry at last. Son Eleazer writes,
"Camp in Battoes, near Four Islands, 40 miles down ye Lake Oct 13."
Nothing very extraordinary has happened yet But we hear our ves-
sels have got below those of ye French. Our men are in high spirits.
We are like to remain here till ye weather changes." An Ensign who
brot ye letter says yt an officer of ours & 24 men mistaking a French
vessel for ours were impressed by her but ours had blocked up the
creek & were pretty sure of them." BENJA POMEROY.
Ralph Pomeroy, son of the Reverend Benjamin Pomeroy, sent
the following to his father, when the latter was serving as Chaplain
at Fort Edward.
HEBRON, Oct. 16, 1758.
Hond Sr:
Yours of the 4th and 5th instant we have received: were very
glad to hear of your welfare, and of Bro Eleazer's ; are in hopes the
Doctr may Recover. The Family at present are all well. Josiah and
Augustus have been very sick but have recovered.
Hazkh Holdridge says he left the Drs greatcoat at Albany in his
chest. He has brot home the old mare and a very old saddle, which
he says is Eleazer's. The old mares back was very much bruised with
it. She is very poor and not able to perform a journey. Palmer rides
up the old horse and your saddle. Mother sends you by Palmer 2
shirts, i stock, and I caravat ; likewise 2 cheeses one of them for the
Dtr. and a little balm and sage.
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
The people here have been without preaching but two Sabbaths
since you left them. The neighboring ministers seem to be very kind,
and they have engaged to supply the pulpit some Sabbaths longer. I
shall wait for a line from you before I set out to come. Mr. Wheelock
says he would not hinder me on account of his school if there be
necessity for it. I expect to know before you receive this. My Hond
Mother sends her love to you. The Dr. and Eleaz Tramway says
give my services to Mr. Pomeroy and tell him my family is well and
love him. Miss Rockwell sends her duty to you. If Bro Eleazer wants
anything Brought from home if he has opportunity to send to me
before and I can bring them. Sarah Ford sends her duty to you.
Mary Major has gone home on account of the sickness of her grand-
children, two of which are dead. Sister Abigail, Brother Josiah and
Hannah join with your unworthy son in duty to you and love to the
Brothers.
(Signed) RALPH POMEROY.
Ralph Pomeroy was a lawyer of good report and served as
Quartermaster-General of Connecticut during the Revolution. When
he was appointed Paymaster of Col. Wyllys's Regiment he subscribed
to the following oath of allegiance :
"I, Ralph Pomeroy, do acknowledge the United States of America
to be free, independent and sovereign states, and declare that the people
thereof owe no allegiance to George the Third, King of Great Britain,
and I renounce, refute and abjure any allegiance or obedience to him :
and I do swear, that I will to the Utmost of my Power, support, main-
tain and defend the said United States against the said King George
the Third, his heirs and successors, and his and their abettors, assist-
ants and adherents, and will serve the United States in the office of
Paymaster to Col. Wyllys's Regiment, which I now hold, with Fidelity
according to the best of my skill and understanding. So help me God.
(Signed) RALPH POMEROY,
West Point, Headquarters, 8th day of March, 1778.
Personally appeared Ralph Pomeroy, Paymaster to Col. Wyllys's
Regt. and took the above oath, by him subscribed, before me.
(Signed) SAMUEL H. PARSONS, B. G."
[170]
A COLONIAL PREACHER AND PATRIOT
The last of Doctor Pomeroy's letters here quoted announced to
his wife the departure of the Provincial troops from Fort Edward.
MONTREAL Sept. n, 1760.
My dear:
I borrow a friends hand just to inform you that I received Mr.
Whalock's letter of August 3d on the 4th instant which was peculiarly
agreeable But before I had opportunity to answer it was seized
violently with some of the usual camp disorders, but thor' pure mercy
am now apparently on the gaining hand.
As our Provincials are returning by the same tedious route by
which they came, I expect to be left here, "to proceed homeward by
way of Crown Point, as soon as possible. I hope for the company of
two worthy and very dear brethren 'Chaplains' Mess. Ogileve & Kirk-
patrick should divine providence see fit to disappoint us of these
Expectations may he give us resignation to his Will, prepare us for
all trials & events & fit us for his holy pleasure.
Give Kind Salutations to the Family, to Dr. Bro. Whalock, to the
Ministers & to the dear people of my Congregation desiring their
prayers, & accept of wonted salutations yourself from, My dear, your
Loving and Affectionate husband
BANJA POMEROY.
P. S. Our son the Doct. is in a poor state of health.
The Reverend Benjamin Pomeroy was commissioned Chaplain
of the Third Connecticut Line (Colonel Samuel Wyllys), on January
i, 1777. He served for one year and six months, resigning on July i,
1778. He was a zealous and able advocate for the civil and religious
liberties of his country, and was warm with patriotism while he offi-
ciated as chaplain. Like a good bishop he was given to hospitality,
and "The broken soldier, kindly bade to stay, sat by his fire, and talked
the night away."
The following statements were extracted from newspaper obit-
uaries of Doctor Pomeroy (a colonial preacher and patriot).
The Reverend Benjamin Pomeroy, D. D., departed this life at
Hebron, Connecticut, the 22nd of December, 1784, in the eighty-first
year of his age ; in the triumphant hope of a blessed immortality. The
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
Reverend Doctor Huntington, of Coventry, preached at his interment,
from Daniel 12, 13: "But go thou thy way, till the end be; for thou
shalt rest, and stand in thy lot, at the end of the days."
He was descended of a pious and respectable family, whose ances-
tors, at an early period of the settlement of New England, [1630]
came from Britain, and settled in the town of Windsor, on the bank of
the Connecticut river. He was a son of Mr. Joseph Pomeroy, of Suf-
field. His capacious mind early discovered an ardent thirst for learn-
ing. He received the first honors of Yale College A. D. 1733. He
and his brother-in-law, the late President Wheelock, were the two first
who received the generous legacy of the Reverend Dean Berkley, to
that College, for superior merit in literature, while they were students
there.
To his judgment, which was penetrating, was joined a warm and
lively imagination. His taste was very good ; and his memory reten-
tive to an uncommon degree. Theology was his chief study from
early life. The ancient and modern poets and classics were familiar
to him, and improved in the cause of virtue and religion. In friend-
ship he was constant and affectionate; and a pattern of the virtues
which adorn the head of a family.
In the days of his youth, he became the friend of God, by the
power of divine grace. The enlarged powers of his soul and all his
acquirements, were consecrated to the work of the ministry of the
gospel, of which he was a most ingenious preacher.
He excelled in casuistry and experimental knowledge. In this
perhaps he hath scarce left his superior. He was active and zealous in
labors in carrying on the reformation, remarkable for the uncommon
effusions of the divine spirit, thro' New England and other parts of
the continent, almost fifty years ago. Multitudes in various parts
of the land rejoiced in his light. His zeal was ardent. It was a zeal
for God and the immortal interests of mankind.
He was a Calvinist in principle, but not a bigot. His sentiments
were liberal. His preaching was evangelical; his address solemn,
pathetic and affecting.
He was greatly assisting, by his disinterested labors, to his worthy
brother, the late President Wheelock, in establishing the foundation
of the school in his vicinity, from which Dartmouth College arose,
[172]
A COLONIAL PREACHER AND PATRIOT
and exerted his kind offices to that seminary to the close of life; of
which he was appointed by royal charter, a trustee. The Senatus
Academics of that University conferred on him the degree of Doctor
in Divinity, A. D. 1774.
His charities and compassion were unbounded. He enjoyed the
luxurious pleasure of mitigating human wo, and wiping the tear from
the face of sorrow. In relieving the wants of others, he was forgetful
of his own. "The blessings of many ready to perish came upon him."
He was called off from his public labors, by a severe asthma,
more than a year before his death, and was wholly deprived of his
sight. His mental powers remained unimpaired to the last. He
familiarly conversed upon his approaching dissolution; and the expec-
tation of an exchange of worlds was pleasant. "He knew that his
Redeemer liveth." He took an affectionate leave of his family, and
sitting in his chair, quietly dropt into the arms of death. He left a
widow and five children to imitate his great example.
His son-in-law, the Reverend David McClure, A. M., delivered a
sermon on the "Death of the Reverend Benjamin Pomeroy, D. D.,"
which was printed in Hartford by Elisha Babcock.
[173]
A History of the Origin and De-
velopment of Banks and Banking
and of Banks and Banking in the
City of New York :-: x :-:
BY
W. Harrison Bayles
and
Frank Allaben
FRANK ALLABEN, Editor-in-Chief
[174]
BANKERS AND BANKING IN THE MIDDLE AGES
CHAPTER II
Banket* and Banking in tf)t QSidblr ftgttf
Venice Becomes the Most Powerful Banking City of the World
The Venetians Display Marvelous Acumen in Their Commercial
Expansion Venice Institutes Forced Loans and Issues Certificates
of Credit Bills of Credit Are Issued in Place of Money Payment
The Venetian Chamber of Loans Becomes the Forerunner of Modern
Banking Failure of So Many Private Banks Causes the Venetian
Senate to Establish the Bank of Rialto Florence Becomes Prominent
in the Banking World Her Bills of Exchange Are Accepted in All
Commercial Cities The Church of Rome Forbids Money-lenders to
Take Interest Jewish Money-lenders Amass Wealth Under the
Protection of the Pope, the Italian Bankers Become Very Prosperous
Gold from the Newly Discovered America Enriches Europe
Supremacy in Commerce Passes to Holland, Making It the Banking
Center of the World The Bank of Amsterdam is Established The
Banks of Middleburg, Hamburg, and Rotterdam Become Prominent
The Bank of Sweden is Founded The First Bank-note is Issued by
the Riksbank in 1658.
[1751
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
II
Hankers attfc Hanking in
; FTER the fall of the Roman Empire there arose upon
the ruins of its government separate Italian states
which, after passing through a long period of strife
and uncertainty, about the beginning of the Eleventh
Century rapidly emerged from their previous insig-
nificance. Among those which attained the most
conspicuous places, achieved the greatest success in trade and com-
merce, and thereby became rich and powerful republics, were Venice,
Florence, Genoa, Pisa, and Sienna.
In the northwestern part of the Adriatic Sea, between the mouth
of the Piave and that of the Adige, some distance from the mainland,
is a long, narrow sand-bank, through which run a number of sea-
passages to the inclosed lagoon, a sheet of shallow water navigable only
by vessels of very light draught. In this lagoon is a cluster of small
islands, to which, when attacked by the invading Huns in the Fifth
Century, some of the inhabitants of Venitia on the mainland fled for
refuge. Here, managing to support themselves by fishing and by the
manufacture of salt, they remained secure from attack. Engaging in
trade and manufactures, in the course of time the settlement grew into
a place of great importance. This was Venicia, or Venice, and thus
arose from the sea one of the noblest and most singular cities of the
world.
Without land, Venice was forced to turn her energies to com-
merce and manufactures, and so well did she succeed that in the
course of a few centuries she not only became a wealthy but an inde-
pendent and powerful city. Her rich merchants and nobles spent their
fortunes on magnificent palaces, on works of art, and on dress. The
houses of the early settlers, "built like sea-birds' nests, half on sea and
half on land," were replaced by marble mansions and magnificent pub-
BANKERS AND BANKING IN THE MIDDLE AGES
lie buildings. Venice became the seat of dazzling magnificence. In
the Fifteenth Century she was called the jewel casket of the world.
"In the first quarter of the Eighth Century the Venetians, after
having lent their fleet to aid the Greeks against the Lombards, passed
from the protection of the Greek Empire to an alliance with Byzan-
tium. They pushed forward into distant seas, and, by the middle of
the Eighth Century, they had already reached Africa and the ports
of the Levant. By their dexterity, sagacity, and activity they obtained
concessions in every quarter." They carried on an extensive trade
with Constantinople, and their ships visited the coast of Morocco and
plowed the waters of the Black Sea and the Sea of Azof.
On the dismemberment of the Latin Empire, Genoa, in common
with the other sections of Italy, successively fell under the dominion
of the Lombards, the Franks, and the Germans; but through all her
vicissitudes she preserved in a remarkable degree her privileges and
her prosperity. Her maritime situation opened to her people the pur-
suit of navigation and commerce, to which they devoted their energies
and in which they displayed a special aptitude. At tke close of the
Eleventh Century Genoa commanded large land and .maval forces and
ranked as a powerful maritime state.
Meanwhile Pisa had also attained to great prosperity and had
risen to the rank of a powerful republic. She was at the height of her
prosperity in the Eleventh Century, and to this period belong most
of the splendid works of art that still adorn the city.
The movement of the Crusades brought the three maritime states
of Italy, Genoa, Pisa, and Venice, to the very forefront of European
history. The Venetians were slow to act, but when they realized the
commercial advantages which might result, they accepted the Crusades
and entered into them with enthusiasm on the grounds of religion and
commercial utility. The three states, in return for their effective
cooperation, obtained maritime possessions and valuable commercial
privileges in the Holy Land. This occasioned much rivalry among
them. Each was jealous of the others and each determined to prevent
the others from obtaining commercial advantages. They seem to
have been as ready to fight each other as they were to engage the
infidel. The Crusades were the means of opening up a large trade
with the East, from which the Italian cities reaped a rich harvest and
by which their prosperity was greatly increased.
[177]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
In the maritime cities of Genoa and Pisa, as in the growing city
of Venice, there must have existed some form of banking, handed
down from the time of the Roman Empire, for all these cities traded
extensively with the Eastern Empire, which was not involved in the
barbarian invasions, and therefore had retained much of the civiliza-
tion of former times. Venice had her mint and coined money in the
Ninth Century. While it is true that neither history nor the records
of that city make any mention of private bankers until the Fourteenth
Century, there probably were banking facilities of some kind much
earlier, for the Venetians displayed marvelous acumen in their com-
mercial expansion, in the management of their guilds, and in the plant-
ing and government of their colonies, and it is difficult to believe that
they developed no system in financial matters. Certainly there were
changers of foreign money, called campsores, and doubtless these from
an early date negotiated loans, and, in course of time, as the business
of the city increased in extent and volume, became bankers.
Although the business methods in vogue in the Italian cities came
down to them directly or indirectly from the Romans, modern bank-
ing has nevertheless been generally considered as having had an
independent origin in the reviving civilization of the Middle Ages.
But business always employs its tools : there had always been a meas-
ure of business ; and probably there never was a complete discontinu-
ance of business methods.
In the Twelfth Century Venice, to meet the expenses of her
various wars, instituted forced loans from her citizens, to whom were
issued certificates of credit for the amounts advanced. Commissioners
were appointed to issue these certificates, or evidences of debt, which
were divisible, negotiable, and could be mortgaged. They might in
some measure thus serve in lieu of coin as a kind of government cur-
rency. A Chamber of Loans was established, into which the interest
due from the government was paid, and thence distributed to those
who were entitled to it, and at this office transfers of credit could be
made from time to time from one creditor to another in place of money
payments. Thus, in a limited degree, there was the use of certificates
of debt as a medium of exchange somewhat after the manner of the
government notes and bank credits of the present day.
These certificates, although not issued in convenient denomina-
BANKERS AND BANKING IN THE MIDDLE AGES
tions, certainly were bills of credit just as much as those issued for
circulation by governments in recent times, and could be made to
serve, in some respect, the same purpose, only in a much more clumsy
way. The Chamber of Loans has been designated by some as the
Bank of Venice, and the date of its establishment has been given as
1171, making it the earliest public bank of modern Europe. Others
have denied it the title of a bank, notwithstanding that it crudely per-
formed some of the functions of a bank of issue, claiming that it was
no more than a transfer office of the government loan. As we go
on, however, we shall see that practically all of the great "banks of
issue" of modern times have grown out of the exigencies of govern-
ment in negotiating loans and issuing credits therefor. From this
viewpoint the Venetian Chamber of Loans was a forerunner of mod-
ern banking.
It is an error, nevertheless, to suppose that these early loans gave
rise to the more famous Banco del Giro of Venice, which was not
founded until 1619. As soon as the latter was established it made a
temporary loan to the republic of 500,000 ducats, which accounts for
the tradition that the Bank of Venice owed its origin to a national
debt. Private banks, however, grew and multiplied in Venice at a
much earlier period. They were banks of deposit and discount, and
their business was very similar to that of modern banks. Some of
them became very powerful and many of them failed. The series of
failures, in the latter part of the Fifteenth and the early part of the
Sixteenth Century, induced the Venetian Senate, by laws passed in
1584 and 1587, to establish the Banco della Piazza del Rialto, a later
law decreeing that all bills of exchange should be paid only by bank
transfers. The Bank of Rialto was thus created solely for the security
and convenience of trade, like the Bank of Amsterdam a little later.
It continued down to 1637, when it was absorbed by the Banco del
Giro, or Bank of Venice, which transacted business in exactly the
same way.
Genoa, during the wars of the Fourteenth Century, borrowed
large sums of money from her citizens, to whom she pledged or
assigned, as security, at least for the interest, the revenue produced
from taxation of certain portions of her territory. The subscribers
to the loans were permitted to collect the taxes, paying into the treas-
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
ury the excess above their claims. The creditors of the state, in
1371, formed a society called the Chapter, which met in a Chapter
House, where a staff of administrators resided and the books were
kept. The loans being of various classes, and the subscribers becom-
ing numerous, with a view to economy a managing committee of
eight was formed to take the place of the many employees who had
formerly administered the different branches of the revenue, and a
corporation was thus founded, about the year 1407, called the Bank
of St. George, which from that time was the sole creditor and mortga-
gee of the state. It soon became almost independent of the state and
exerted a powerful influence on state affairs. Every senator, on
assuming the duties of his office, took oath to maintain the rights and
privileges of the bank, which were confirmed by the Pope and the
German Emperor. "The bank interposed its advice in every measure
of government," says Hallam, "and generally, it is admitted, to the
public advantage. It equipped armaments at its own expense, one of
which subdued the island of Corsica; and this acquisition, like those
of our great Indian corporation, was long subject to a company of
merchants, without any interference of the mother country." How-
ever, these functions of the so-called Bank of Genoa were neither
those of the modern bank of issue nor bank of deposit, although anal-
ogy may be established with some of the fiduciary operations of the
modern trust company.
Fiesole (anciently, Faesulae), situated on the crest of an irregular
hill, was one of the earliest of Etruscan cities. Its site was probably
originally selected as offering protection from its enemies. Access to
it was so difficult to the traders who visited its market places, with
their various articles of merchandise, that it was decreed that they
should be allowed to assemble at the base of the hill in the fertile
plain traversed by the Arno, where a few rough shelters were erected
to accommodate them. These, according to traditions accepted by the
Florentine historians, became the nucleus from which sprang the
splendid city of Florence. As early as the time of Sulla there had
been a Roman colony here; another was sent after the death of lulius
Caesar, and it soon became a thriving town.
After the fall of the Roman Empire, true to its traditions as a
city founded for and devoted to trade, Florence passed through a
[180]
BANKERS AND BANKING IN THE MIDDLE AGES
period of alternate strife and commercial expansion, to find itself, in
the Eleventh Century, under the protection of Rome, a free city, whose
trade extended throughout all Europe, whose citizens were the pos-
sessors of great commercial depots in France and England, and the
skill of whose workers in jewels and the precious metals had grown
proverbial.
Although Florence was not a seaport, yet by the middle of the
Thirteenth Century her merchants had established commercial rela-
tions with all the markets of the East and West and had succeeded in
extending her trade to almost every part of the known world. Her
nearest rival on the side toward Rome was Sienna, on which she
looked with envious eyes because the Siennese enjoyed a goodly share
of the business of acting as financial agents of the Pope, one of the
main sources of their prosperity. After the great battle of Montiperti,
Sienna for a time maintained her ascendancy and dominated all Tus-
cany. But Sienna was Ghibelline, while Florence, strongly Guelph,
was loud and strong in her support of the party of the Pope. Sienna
soon felt the powerful hand of the Church, in the form of interdicts
and excommunications, and was forced to succumb to these irresistible
influences. Florence then took the lead, especially in trade, and was
able to maintain it.
She thus became the center of a vast commercial system which
radiated through every part of Europe and to all the large and
important cities of Asia and Africa. This trade was not of sudden
growth, but was the result of long-continued effort. Having corre-
spondents or agents in every region, the Florentine merchants had
little trouble in collecting money or making payments in almost any
commercial city. For example, they bought up the Flemish wool and
rough cloth which, after being dressed and dyed in Florence, was
returned to Northern Europe, or sent to the East, from whence came
in return silks, dyes, and spices. It was quite natural, therefore, for a
trader of Antwerp or Bruges, wishing to make a payment in Rome, or
some eastern city, to apply to some one of the Florentine merchants in
his own town.
In such transactions the Florentine merchant received an agio
on the money to be paid, in some city of the East, for instance, and
by sending its equivalent in the form of merchandise, reaped a second
[181]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
profit, or, by sending merchandise to Florence, where it was sold and
the amount again put in merchandise suitable to the place where pay-
ment was to be made, realized even a third profit. In making collec-
tions of money due, the process just described was simply reversed.
In this way not alone was the trade of the Florentines extended, but
they gradually became the bankers, money-changers, and negotiators
of exchange for all Europe.
Florentine merchants were constantly sending goods to the East,
and making purchases there, and Florentine bankers presently had
their branch houses in various cities. Hence it became increasingly
easy to negotiate a bill of exchange, or letter of credit, making or
demanding payment in almost any commercial city. Thus the world's
commercial paper was bought and sold in Florence, as formerly it had
been in Athens, and a little later in Rome; Florence serving as the
center of exchange in the Middle Ages, as London and New York
serve in our own day.
The bill of exchange has been said by some to have been an inven-
tion of the merchants of Genoa. Others have attributed its origin to
the Jews and Lombards, banished from France and England in the
Thirteenth Century for usury and other alleged vices, who are said
to have devised the bill of exchange in order to withdraw property left
in these countries. Neither of these statements nor suppositions is
credible. As we have seen, bills of exchange were extensively used in
ancient Chaldea, in Babylon, in ancient Greece, and afterwards in
Rome, both in the time of the Republic and under the Empire through-
out its whole extent. After the fall of the Roman Empire there were
many cities on the shores and islands of the Mediterranean that were
engaged in extensive trade and had retained the civilization of Rome,
and it is scarcely possible that during what are called the dark ages
the art of transferring credit by means of bills of exchange was
entirely lost.
The bill of exchange, in its simplest form, is nothing more than
a letter from one person or business man to another requesting him to
pay the bearer, or a person named in the letter, a certain sum of money,
charging it against the writer's account. A bank draft is such a bill.
Its real importance consists in its convenience, and, therefore, its exten-
sive use in the adjustment of credits between different commercial
BANKERS AND BANKING IN THE MIDDLE AGES
cities, eliminating the necessity of the actual transportation of gold
or silver, generally involving a higher cost and greater risk and dan-
ger. Thus, too, at each point of exchange coin is needed only to settle
the balances of trade, and not the total operations, and thus immense
exchanges in trade are carried on with the use of comparatively little
currency. In all this the Italians, and especially the Florentines, early
became proficient. They were unsurpassed in the art of finance, con-
ducting business on principles which, by simple elaboration, have been
made to serve the demands of the complex and enormous transactions
of modern times.
In the reviving commerce of the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries
the fair was employed as a convenient instrument for facilitating
trade. The fairs of Champagne in eastern France were of an interna-
tional character, were in fact world-marts. There were six of them
each year and they attracted traders from every part of Europe. They
were held in the towns of Lagny, Bar-sur-Aube, Provins, and Troyes,
each lasting from one and a half to two and a half months, and each
succeeding the one before in such a way as to make them practically
continuous throughout the year.
Each of these fairs was inaugurated on or near one of the great
holidays of the Church, and its opening was celebrated by a formal act
of worship, such as was usual in mediaeval times. Wooden booths
were erected to accommodate the merchants, and scores of tongues
and dialects resounded along the streets formed by these temporary
structures. Each man, by his dress or by the style in which he wore
his hair or beard, gave unmistakeable notice of his nativity.
Among the merchants thus gathered were many Italians who, on
account of their sharp bargains, were usually designated as Lombard
dogs. These were especially active at the end of each fair, for the
sale of goods having been effected, the work of the banker and money-
changer was in demand to adjust the differences between the many
coinage systems. Armed with great leathern purses, these bankers
offered their services in effecting exchange in the different moneys
found at the fair, or in extending a loan, on good security, to some
unlucky trader hard pressed for cash. The rate of interest was rarely
less than twenty per cent, per annum, and might be as high as fifty
per cent., or even more. This excessive rate of interest was due,
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
perhaps, not more to the greed of the lender than to the scarcity of
coin in the Middle Ages and the lack of loaning companies. As inter-
est of any kind was at that time outlawed as usury, the risk of loan-
ing was great and had to be paid for by the borrowers. 1
Letters of Siennese merchants, that have been preserved, show
how in that city companies were formed for trading at the French
fairs of Champagne, and it was probably pretty much the same in the
other Italian cities. Several citizens would form a partnership and
dispatch one or more of their number to Champagne to turn their com-
bined capital to account. Almost all the great Siennese families fig-
ure in this correspondence. While the business appears to have been
traffic in money, their aim, above everything else, was big profit, and
the opportunities were great.
All interest in the Middle Ages was considered "usury," no mat-
ter at what rate, and was strictly forbidden by the Church. The edict
of the Church was followed by legislation against usury in almost all
the states and cities of Europe. As a result the business of loaning
money was for a time left almost entirely to the Jews, whose Scrip-
tural law forbade a Jew taking interest from a Jew, but not from a
Gentile, so that there grew up a system of money-lending from Jews
to Christians. Circumstance thus made the Jews the first great
money-lenders of Europe. But when trade, stimulated by the Cru-
sades, became more active, the Christians were not disposed to allow
the profitable banking business to be monopolized by the Jews, and,
during the period of the fairs of Champagne Christian money-lenders
came to the front.
In time the prejudice against interest or usury somewhat abated.
In the Thirteenth Century Sienna, notwithstanding the position of the
Church, authorized usury, provided the usurer was not a man of ill
repute and of suspicious religious opinions. To a papal inquisitor it
was reported that there was in Sienna a notary, Ser Pietro by name,
who practiced usury, and, besides, "stubbornly asserted that to lend
money to people was not a sin, and that the brothers and religious who
said otherwise nesciunt quid loquantiir; they do not know what they
are talking about." Ser Pietro did not live long enough to feel the
effects of the denunciation of the Church, which soon followed. It
iSee note on usury and interest at the end of this chapter. F. A.
[184]
BANKERS AND BANKING IN THE MIDDLE AGES
must be remembered that the attitude of Church and State in regard
to usury was directed against tremendous interest rates, exacted in
that day. On the other hand, it no doubt gave opportunity for much
injustice practiced under the plea of enforcing the law. There was
scarcely a man in power who did not periodically arrest Jews, and
sometimes Italians, on the ground of usury. These were released only
on the payment of a sum sufficient to establish a presumption of
innocence, which sum was in proportion to their ability to pay. 1
The business of trading at the French fairs had a romantic and
adventurous side. The merchants, passing in large caravans across
valleys and over mountains, were sometimes beset by robbers against
whom it was necessary to defend themselves with the sword. Lords
and castle-men, worse than thieves, also imposed exactions, which had
to be settled with dues and presents as seemed best. The journey from
fair to fair was made in the midst of the greatest risks and dangers.
The villages and cities, through which the merchants passed, likewise
imposed exactions of every sort. If the barons of France allowed the
merchants and money-lenders to gain large profits from their subjects,
they did not fail to demand a share of it for themselves; so that the
agents of the trading companies "were obliged, in order to curry favor,
to keep their purses open, since without a discreet liberality, neither
life nor substance was secure."
Compared with those of more ancient, as well as modern, times
prices were exceedingly low. The cause of this, in a large measure,
was the scarcity of the precious metals used as a medium of exchange.
In the early history of the world kings and rulers were accustomed to
accumulate as large a treasure of gold and silver as possible. There
is a fascination in these metals, which it is easy to explain, since the
possession of a large treasure in them gives power in both peace and
war. There were always soldiers, ready to serve for pay in gold or
silver.
Slaves, generally those captured in war, were by rulers who had
gold or silver mines used to work them, and it was not a question
whether the production of the metal was commercially profitable or
not. The desire to get it was gratified at whatever cost of human
energy. Enormous quantities of gold and silver were used for orna-
tSee note at the end of this chapter. F. A.
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
mental purposes, especially of gold. When used in commercial trans-
actions, the metals passed by weight, as we have seen. They were
always an important item in the booty of conquered cities. Not being
largely used in coined money, waste was not great, so that whatever
was added to the world's stock remained in use and was not lost. For
many centuries the supply continually increased.
When Rome became the ruler of the most important part of the
known world, wars ceased between the different part of what then
constituted the Empire and in which the precious metals had formed
a large part of the booty. The Romans had acquired by capture vast
supplies of gold and silver, which, to a larger extent than ever before,
were coined into money and used to pay their soldiers. Mints were
set up in different parts of the Empire and a large amount of gold and
silver put in circulation as money. It is supposed that in the time of
Augustus the amount of gold and silver in existence was about four
hundred million pounds sterling.
The mining operations, which down to that time had been so
extensively carried on, were to a large extent discontinued. By the
Roman system the mines were "farmed" out to persons who worked
only the best ones and such as would give them profitable returns. In
the course of time the mines were almost entirely deserted, so that in
the Sixth or Seventh Century of the Christian era the production of
gold and silver hardly made a perceptible addition to the existing stock.
This cutting off of the sources of supply, and the waste in the existing
stock from being largely used as coin, which is probably the most
destructive use to which gold and silver can be put, caused the amount
of the precious metals to decline so that prices were only a fraction of
what they had been. It is estimated that the world's stock of money
metal thus became reduced to about two hundred million dollars.
After the year 800 A. D. the stock was kept from diminishing further
by supplies chiefly from the mines of Spain.
The profits of trade in the Middle Ages were enormous. The
traders possessed virtual monopolies in many lines, and held the keys
of those eastern countries whence were brought the luxuries for which
there was a constantly-increasing demand. The merchants of some of
the cities of Italy became so opulent as almost to rival the ancient
nobility. In the latter part of the Thirteenth Century the Florentine
[186!
BANKERS AND BANKING IN THE MIDDLE AGES
manufacturers of various kinds were also very considerable. Profits
were large and wealth increased with great rapidity. The largest for-
tunes were at this time probably made in the manufacture of woolen
cloth, which was the most important industry of the city. Throughout
the Fourteenth Century Florence held the lead in trade and finance
among the Italian cities, having during the first half of this century
more than two hundred cloth manufacturing and dyeing establish-
ments, where from seventy to eighty thousand pieces of cloth were pro-
duced annually, valued at two million two hundred thousand gold
florins. More than thirty thousand persons were supported by this
manufacture and trade. The dressing and dyeing of foreign cloth
held also an important place.
As we have seen, it was this commercial activity of the Floren-
tines, and the connections formed by them in making sales of their
goods in every part of Europe that had led them to engage in that
other branch of trade, banking; and in consequence of their energy and
success in this, the monetary transactions of many of the kingdoms of
Europe passed through their hands, and in some countries, where
large loans had been made, they were entrusted with the collection and
administration of the public revenue. The Florentines were lending
money at interest to sovereign princes as early as the first quarter of
the Twelfth Century.
The prince who at this time supplied the greatest impetus towards
the development of trade and finance was the Pope. The earliest inter-
national banking operations seem to have arisen from his need of
finding means of collecting and transmitting to Rome the dues which
he gathered in distant parts. He had financial relations with all the
world. From every part of Europe flowed towards Rome a continu-
ous stream of money, the collection and transmission of which was
entrusted to Italian merchants, or bankers. The advantages gained
in handling the Pope's money were among the features which enabled
the Italians to take the lead in banking and to keep it for a long period.
In the city of Sienna may still be seen on the front of an ancient
building an inscription which states that Angelieri Solafica, campsor
Domini Papae Grcgorii IX, "built this house," A. D. 1234.
The Pope entrusted a great deal of business to another Siennese
banking house, the Buonsignori, one of the greatest of the Thirteenth
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
century, becoming known as the Magna Tavola. In 1289 this house
had a capital in business of 35,000 gold florins, which at that time was
considered a tremendous sum of money. Among its clients were
popes, emperors, kings, barons, merchants, and cities.
While vast financial advantages resulted from collecting and
accumulating the Pope's moneys, the Italians who enjoyed them fre
quently brought down upon themselves the envy and hatred of the
various peoples among whom they operated. In the reign of Henry
III. of England (i'2i6-i265) the Pope, through his Italian agents,
obtained large sums from the English prelates. As the bishops and
abbots were sometimes unable to pay the sums assessed, they were
compelled to borrow from the collectors at exorbitant rates of interest.
Matthew Paris, a chronicler of the time, regards the Italian bankers
as the pest of his country and designates them as Lombardice canes.
The Italians, or Lombards, settled in London and carried on their
business in a part of the city which still bears the name of Lombard
street, and which has ever since been the locality frequented by banks
and bankers. It has long been not alone the financial center of Eng-
land, but of the world ; and to the present time only one other of the
great centers of finance, New York City, threatens its supremacy.
When the papal court was transferred from Rome to Avignon,
and on its return to Rome, there was occasion, twice at least, for the
movement of great financial interests and the transfer of large sums
of money. The papal residence at Avignon caused a greatly increased
sending back and forth of money between Italy and that city. Accord-
ing to good authority this was the favorable time when the Florentine
contractors of the papal revenue were enabled to become the principal
bankers of Rome.
In the middle of the Fourteenth Century the Alberti had banks at
Avignon, Bruges, Brussels, Paris, Sienna, Perugia, Rome, Naples,
Bartella, Constantinople, and Venice. The Peruzzi, and their asso-
ciates the Bardi, had agencies and dependent houses still more widely
scattered. The extensive business and colossal operations of the Pe-
ruzzi and Bardi as bankers and loan-contractors, however, ended in a
bankruptcy which shook the whole commercial fabric of Europe to its
very foundation, and occasioned great loss and distress. This occurred
in the year 1346, and was caused by the failure of Edward III. of
[188]
BANKERS AND BANKING IN THE MIDDLE AGES
England to pay the enormous sum of 1,365,000 gold florins, advanced
to him by these bankers. The King's inability to pay was caused by
his wars with France. Various English Kings borrowed largely
from Florentine bankers. Commines declares that Edward IV. owed
his throne to help obtained from them. At a subsequent period the
Strozzi suffered heavy losses through loans made to the King of
France and to the popes. Such losses lead us to the conclusion that
loan-contracting was a somewhat hazardous business. At the same
time there is abundant evidence to prove that, in general, it was an
extremely profitable one, and that the wealth brought into Florence
by this branch of trade was enormous.
Florence had an evil reputation for usury. The money-changers'
guild, one of the oldest in Florence, prospered as the city prospered.
The business was carried on in the New Market, which today is the
flower market, under the graceful colonnades of which the bankers
had their shops, with counters or tavoletti, money-bags, and ledgers.
All business had to be transacted in the shop, and registered in the
account book, and there were heavy penalties for infringement of the
rules. No one was allowed to practice the craft without being on the
matriculation list, a privilege obtained by giving proofs of capacity
and honesty during matriculation and swearing to obey the statutes of
the guild. In the early part of the Fifteenth Century, when Florence
had reached the summit of her prosperity, there were seventy-two
banks in the streets round about the New Market, and it was estimated
that the amount of gold currency in the city was upwards of two mil-
lion florins, while the wealth in merchandise and other possessions
was enormous.
One of the most important cities on the Mediterranean in the
Fourteenth Century was Barcelona in Spain. Its merchant ships vied
with those of Genoa and Venice, trading as far east as Alexandria and
as far west as the Baltic and the North Sea. Its code of maritime law
was recognized as authoritative by many European states. Consuls
represented Barcelona in the principal commercial centers, and this
city was among the first to adopt the practice of marine insurance.
Previous to the year 1349 the drapers of Barcelona, probably
among its most opulent and substantial citizens, had evidently car-
ried on the business of banking and exchanging money, very much as
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
the rich merchants of Venice and Florence had done, and as the gold-
smiths at a later period did in London; for, by an order of the King
of Aragon, the Barcelonian drapers were in 1349 obliged to give secur-
ity before being allowed to undertake such business. In 1401 the
magistrates of Barcelona established a bank of exchange and deposit,
called Taula de cambi (Table of exchange), secured by the funds of
the city, with the intention of extending the accommodation afforded
by it to foreigners as well as citizens.
The following is a close translation of a bill of exchange sold by
Antonio Quarti, a merchant of Luca residing in Bruges, to John
Columbo, a merchant of Barcelona also residing in Bruges, to be paid
at Barcelona in the usual manner by Francisco de Prato, a merchant
of Florence.
"Francisco de Prato and Company at Barcelona.
"In the name of God. Amen the 28th day of April, 1404.
"Pay this first of exchange at usance to Piero Gilberto and Piero
Olivo one thousand scutes at ten shillings Barcelona money per scute ;
which thousand scutes are in exchange with John Columbo at twenty-
two grosses per scute. Pay on our account and Christ keep you.
"Antonio Quarti sal. of Bruges."
This bill and another, differing only in the date and in being
made payable to Piero Gilberto and Piero de Scorpo, were sent to Bar-
celona, but were not paid by Prato. William Columbo, acting as agent
for Gilberto, Olivo, and Scorpo, purchased scutes in Barcelona to pay
the bills and returned them, protested, to John Columbo at Bruges,
claiming reimbursement from Antonio Quarti for the expense. But
Antonio Quarti alleged that William Columbo should have gotten the
money to pay the bills from the Bank of Barcelona, according to the
custom of the city in such cases, which would have been less expensive.
As a result, the magistrates of Bruges wrote to those of Barcelona
requesting information on this subject, and it was on account of this
correspondence that these bills were preserved.
It appears from records still extant that foreign bills of exchange
were habitually negotiated at the Bank of Barcelona, and that assist-
ance was given to manufacturers in the purchase of raw material,
such as English wool, etc. By all accounts, therefore, the Bank of
Barcelona financed and facilitated business much more in the manner
[190]
BANKERS AND BANKING IN THE MIDDLE AGES
of the bank of the present day than did any other public institution of
the Renaissance period. Spanish writers claim that it was the very
first establishment of its kind in Europe, while Ilallam remarks that
"The earliest bank of deposit instituted for the accommodation of
private merchants is said to have been that of Barcelona in 1401."
The creditors of Genoa were at that time not yet incorporated as a
banking company.
Many of the early Italian bankers had branch establishments in
Rome. The Via del Banco of the papal city became the Wall street
of the Renaissance, and here the bankers had their quarters and car-
ried on financial transactions with the Camera Apostolica, the greatest
financial institution then existing, into which were paid the collec-
tions made for the Pope, through the agencies of these banks, in every
part of the world. About the middle of the Sixteenth Century, after
the reform of Paul III., this street lost its prestige, and the section of
the city in which it was located, considered the most fashionable and
desirable from the time of Innocent VIII. to that of Paul III., subse-
quently lost caste, the palaces of bankers, merchants, and prelates
becoming tenanted by people and tradesmen of the lower classes. For
this reason the street retained its Sixteenth Century aspect, free from
such changes as had been made in more fashionable neighborhoods,
until the year 1888.
The money sent to Rome from all parts of the world was in coins
of the greatest variety. To some of these a legal value was given;
some were tolerated. Monetary transactions were carried on in
florins, ducats, scudi, carlini, testoni, morapesini, corone, crazie, guilii,
etc. While the exchanging of all this diverse money for coin, current
in Rome or in the place where it was to be used, gave business to the
bankers, it was a great obstacle to commercial enterprises.
The monetary system of Charlemagne, derived from that of the
Roman Empire and of the Eastern Empire, was the precursor and
source of the chief currency systems of mediaeval and modern Europe,
except that of Spain, which was derived directly from the Roman sys-
tem without the intermediation of that of Charlemagne. The mone-
tary basis was the libra or pound. The Florentines, the Venetians,
and the citizens of many other Italian cities, made their calculations in
lire, soldi, and denari. The silver lire, originally libra, supposed to
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
weigh a pound, the conventional standard or unit of value, consisted
of twenty soldi, each equal to the Lombard shilling, while the soldi
consisted of twelve denari, corresponding to the English pound, shill-
ing, and pence. In France the reckoning by livres, sols, and denier s,
was derived from the Prankish Kings. One livre was equal to twenty
sols, and one sol was valued at twelve deniers. Germany, too,
inherited her monetary system from that of Charlemagne. The silver
libra was divided into twenty shillingen, and the shilling into twelve
pfennings. In The Netherlands the same system was reproduced. The
ideal Flemish pound was divided into twenty shillingen, and the shill-
ing into twelve grooten.
Before the reign of Clement VII., who issued the first state secur-
ities, the popes borrowed money directly from the bankers, with whom
were deposited certain valuables as security. In the state archives is
the account of such a transaction between Pope Leo X. and Piero and
Giovanni Bini, Florentine bankers in Rome in the year 1521. The
Pope had become indebted to them by loans made from time to time
to the total of 156,000 ducats ($195,000), for which they had received
no special security besides the Pope's written acknowledgment. A
more substantial safeguard was requested. This was at once granted
in a document, motu proprio, dated September 25, 1521, which stipu-
lated that the brothers Bini were authorized to sell to the highest bid-
der the offices of the papal curia, as fast as they became vacant by
death, the proceeds of the sale, up to the sum of 30,000 ducats, to go
to the Bini, the surplus to be equally divided between them and the
Apostolic Chamber. This agreement was to continue until the Bini
had recovered the entire loan with interest. As security for the ful-
fillment of this contract the Pope entrusted to the firm the mitre of
Paul II., the mitre and tiara of Julius II., and the "sacred pontificial
silver vessels including those used for the celebration of divine
service." In the inventory of the strong room of the castle of Sant'
Angelo, where it was usually kept, the description of the triregnum, or
tiara of Julius II., occupies as much as four closely written pages.
This gorgeous headgear was studded with thirty-nine diamonds,
twenty-nine emeralds, twenty-two sapphires, sixty-nine rubies,
twenty-seven balases, and five hundred and seventy-one pearls, besides
an inscription written in small diamonds and punctuated with small
[192]
BANKERS AND BANKING IN THE MIDDLE AGES
rubies. These articles, emblems of authority and instruments of wor-
ship, held as security by the bankers, were probably loaned back for
use when occasion required.
The banking house of the Bini was on the corner of the Via del
Banco and the Via del Consolato. The hall in which the cashiers and
clerks sat had a vaulted ceiling, in the center of which was a most
charming composition of Pierimo del Vaga the coat of arms of the
Bini, in a frame of fruit and flowers, supported by two cupids. The
building was demolished in 1888.
Clement VII. was the first pope to raise money from state bonds.
The sum realized on the first issue was not large, but, having acquired
the art of raising money on bonds, the burden of which could be dis-
tributed over future years, Clement VII. and his successors made lib-
eral use of this method, so essential in modern business, and
increased the public debt to such an extent that the total revenues of
the Pontifical States were scarcely sufficient to pay the interest. It is
said that from the time of Paul III. to that of Paul IV. about twenty
years the Apostolic Chamber spent some sixteen millions of dollars
in aiding the German princes who remained faithful to Rome, some-
times borrowing money at an interest rate as high as twelve and a half
per cent.
One of the most successful Italian bankers of the first part of the
Sixteenth Century was Agostino Chigi, who was born in Sienna about
1465. He was possessed of such talent for trade that before he
reached the age of forty years he had become, it is said, the most pow-
erful man financially in the world. He was not only a great merchant
and financier, but a patron of the arts and one of the greatest collectors
of his time. His palace, by the Porta Settimiana, was designed by
Peruzzi and decorated by Raphael and Guilio Romano. He gave
employment to many of the great artists whose works still exist in
the churches of Rome.
He started in business with Stefano Ghinucci, in the Via del
Banco, with an aggregate capital of not over two thousand two hun-
dred and fifty dollars. In May, 1502, he entered into a second part-
nership with Francesco Tommasi, with a capital of ten thousand
dollars, and in 1508 was the sole owner and manager of the most
prosperous and extensive banking concern in the world, dealing in all
[193]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
branches of trade with France, Spain, Germany, the Low Countries,
England, and Turkey, and holding in Italy a monopoly of trade in the
three staples, wheat, salt, and alum. He was banker to Pope Alexan-
der VI., and afterwards became Minister of Finance, or financial
adviser to and confidant of Pope Julius II.
When Cardinal Giovanni de Medici became Pope, as Leo X., the
procession to the Lataran, announced for the morning of April n,
1513, was the most magnificent that Rome had ever seen. In front of
the residence of Agostino Chigi had formerly stood one of the
triumphal arches of Rome. This, for the occasion, Agostino caused
to be restored, and then adorned with figures and groups of living
men, women, and children, the fairest subjects to be found in Rome,
representing Apollo, Mercury, Pallas, etc. There were two nymphs,
attended by Moorish pages, one of whom recited verses as the Pope
passed by. Agostino was on intimate terms with Leo, and not long
after the latter became Pope, the banker gave several entertainments
in his honor, for which the villa Farnisina, on the Tiber, has been
more celebrated than for all the priceless treasures of art which it
contained.
The first of these functions was given in an unfinished building,
the condition of which, from designs furnished by Raphael himself,
was so skilfully concealed by means of Flemish tapestries, oriental
carpets, and cupboards filled with gold plate, that the Pope was
astonished at the sight of such magnificence. The second was held a
few months later, in the loggia projected on the Tiber at the south end
of the garden. At this feast, it is said, the price of three fish alone
amounted to two hundred and fifty crowns; and to prove that the
same silver plate was not used twice in the course of the meal, the
dishes were thrown into the Tiber, where they fell into nets spread
beneath the surface of the water. The third of these entertainments
was given in the main hall of the Casino, on the twenty-eighth of
August, 1519, on the festival of Sant' Agostino, and presented two
original features. Each of the twenty cardinals, or foreign represen-
tatives, was served on silver and gold plate bearing his particular
coat of arms, crest and motto, and each guest was served with fish,
game, fruit, vegetables, delicacies, and wines peculiar to his own
country. These supplies had been brought to Rome by messengers
timed to arrive on the eve of the banquet.
[194]
BANKERS AND BANKING IN THE MIDDLE AGES
Agostino's yearly income was estimated at 70,000 ducats, an
enormous sum for that period. He stated to Pope Leo, whom he was
fond of entertaining in the beautiful garden of the Villa Farnisina,
that, besides the central banking establishment at Rome, he had one
hundred branch houses in Italy alone, that one hundred vessels sailed
under his flag from the docks and harbor of Porto Ercole, and that
twenty thousand men were in his employ. He also had houses of
business in Constantinople, Alexandria, Cairo, Lyons, Amsterdam,
London, and even in Babylon. He filled his villa with tapestries, gold
and silver ornaments designed by the foremost goldsmiths, and with
other works of art. The fixtures of the bath-room were of solid sil-
ver. His bedstead, it is said, was carved in ivory, encrusted with gold,
and studded with precious stones.
Some of the rich bankers of Italy founded families which became
linked with many of the royal houses of Europe. One of the most
important of these was the Medici. Two of this family became Popes
of Rome, Leo X. and Clement VII. Dukes of Florence and of Tus-
cany were of this family, and it became connected by marriage with
the royal house of France, members of it becoming ancestors of
French Kings. Fabio Chigi, nephew and biographer of Agostino
Chigi, the rich banker of Rome, became Pope Alexander VII.
The taking of Constantinople, in 1453, an ^ tne victories of the
Turks throughout the East, cut off in a great measure the trade in
that direction of the Italian cities, and especially of Venice. But still
more disastrous to this trade was the voyage of Vasquez de Gama, a
Portuguese who in 1497 passed around the Cape of Good Hope and
opened a new route to the East Indies. Hearing of it, a merchant of
Venice noted in his diary: "This is the worst piece of news we could
ever have had." A few years before this Columbus had discovered
the new world. These great events carried important consequences
to all the nations of Europe. The art of printing, about the same time,
was exercising a strong influence on the times, while the invention
and use of gunpowder changed the whole art of war. Notable changes
were produced in trade. The prosperity of the cities on the Mediter-
ranean began to be transferred to the ports of the Atlantic.
Soon after the discovery of America the rich spoils of the Span-
iards, in the form of gold and silver, were poured into the markets of
[195]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
Europe and produced disturbance in trade. The annual production of
silver, after the discovery of the rich mines of South America about
the year 1545, has been estimated at over two million pounds sterling.
This was a huge addition to the then-existing world-supply of the
precious metals, supposed to have been about forty millions. The
effect was not immediate, but in the course of fifteen or twenty years
prices advanced in England and throughout all Europe. People who
had depended mainly on fixed incomes had to cut down their scale of
living. On account of higher prices for English wool, farmers turned
their plough-lands into pasturage for sheep. Great numbers of ser-
vants and farm-hands were discharged. Wage-earners also became
needy on account of the high prices, and poverty was general ; but the
increase of money had a marvelous effect in developing trade.
By the close of the Sixteenth Century the supremacy in commerce
had passed over to Holland. "Before the grandeur of Venice had
declined," says Macaulay, "another commonwealth still less favored,
if possible, by nature, had rapidly risen to a power and opulence which
the whole civilized world contemplated with envy and admiration. On
a desolate marsh overhung by fogs and exhaling disease, a marsh
where there was neither wood nor stone, neither firm earth nor
drinkable water, a marsh from which the ocean on one side and the
Rhine on the other were with difficulty kept out by art, was to be
found the most prosperous community in Europe. The wealth which
was collected within five miles of the Stadthouse of Amsterdam would
purchase the fee-simple of Scotland."
The prosperous trade of Amsterdam attracted to that city
merchants of all nationalities, who brought into it coins of every
description. 3 Had Amsterdam been the capital or metropolis of an
extensive country under one control, like England or France, it might
have been possible, to some extent, to have reformed the currency ; but
it was surrounded by numerous small principalities, each with its own
mint and each with its own standard of coinage. All such coins as
were produced by these separate states were poured into the active
sHere, too, arose great Dutch hanking and financial houses, rivalling their Italian predecessors. One
of the most notable of these, the Hochstetters of Amsterdam, attempted to "corner" the tin market of the
world between 1511 and 1517, and, like some of their imitators since, were squeezed to the extent of
one-third of the immense sums they had invested in the metal. It was of the head of this house that a
contemporary wrote: "Princes, counts, nobles, tradesmen, peasants, valets, and servants have placed
with Ambrose Hocbstetter all their money, for which he pays five per cent." F. A.
[196]
BANKERS AND BANKING IN THE MIDDLE AGES
trade of the city. Some were worn, others clipped or mutilated ; many
were produced by private mints. On an average they were about nine
per cent, below their nominal value. Money, fresh from the mint,
was soon carried away or melted down, as is always the case when
inferior money is in circulation. To pay their bills of exchange,
drawn against purchased goods, the merchants of Amsterdam, hav-
ing great difficulty in finding good money, were put to much incon-
venience and loss. The uncertain nature of the currency of the city,
being valued in all foreign states below its actual worth, made the
exchange very much against the merchants of Amsterdam, and the
value of their bills of exchange was very uncertain, in spite of every
effort.
By an ordinance of the city, January 31, 1609, the Bank of
Amsterdam was established to remedy these inconveniences, to pre-
vent loss, and to facilitate trade. It was a bank of deposit without
capital of its own. The object of the institution was to give a fixed
and unquestioned value to a bill on Amsterdam ; and for this purpose
all sorts of coin were received on deposit at the bank, their true weight
and fineness determined, and credit given for their actual value in
standard coin, less a small charge for recoinage and expense of man-
agement. Depositors were allowed to draw out for their own use, or
to transfer to others, the true value so credited in standard money, or
in "bank money," as it was commonly called, which was without hesi-
tation accepted by merchants without the need of testing its value.
The ordinance which established the bank required that all bills
of exchange payable in Amsterdam, of six hundred gulden or upwards,
should be paid through the bank or by the transfer of credit at the
bank. In 1643 this limit was lowered to three hundred gulden. In
consequence, every merchant of prominence kept an account with the
bank, to pay his foreign bills and to reduce the coins he received in
trade to a known and unmistakable value. Transfers of credit were
at first made personally at the bank, by the payer or his authorized
agent, which entitled the payee to the credit on the next day. They
were later made by orders in writing. Extravagant estimates were
made of the amount of gold and silver in the vaults of the bank. The
amount has been placed by some as high as 900,000,000 gulden, but
the more modern estimate of 33,000,000 gulden ($13,500,000), made
by Adam Smith, is probably more accurate.
[197]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
For every gulden of bank money, or credit, it was understood and
confidently believed that there was a gulden of specie in the vaults of
the bank. Although this was a regulation of the institution, it was
not strictly adhered to, for as early as 1657 individuals were allowed
to overdraw their accounts, while at various times in later years enor-
mous loans were made to the Dutch East India Company. The truth
became known to the public in the winter of 1789. In 1795 a report
was issued showing that the City of Amsterdam was largely indebted
to the bank, which held as security the obligations of Holland and
West Friesland. The debt was paid and an effort made to keep the
bank on its feet, but the need for such a bank had declined with the
dwindling commercial importance of Amsterdam. The bank was
accordingly closed by royal decree, December 19, 1819.
By supplying a currency that would be accepted by anyone with-
out question, the Bank of Amsterdam contributed greatly to the pros-
perity of the city.* Similar banks were established in Middelburg
(March 28, 1616), in Hamburg (1619), and in Rotterdam (February
9, 1635). Of these the Bank of Hamburg was the most important.
The Bank of Hamburg was founded on precisely the same plan
as the Bank of Amsterdam. It had no capital of its own. No loans
were made and no liabilities created beyond the credits on its books
for the coin or bullion received on deposit. This rule was faithfully
kept. When the French took possession of it, on November 5, 1813,
there was found in the bank 7,506,343 marks in silver, more than
sufficient to redeem all outstanding liabilities. A large part of this
4To Amsterdam flowed the available capital of the world in the seventeenth century, and in the Bank
of Amsterdam the operation of money-changing, a principal function of the ancient and mediaeval banker,
reached its climax in the largest single institution for this kind of transaction in the history of the world.
It was an "Exchange Bank," as its name, indeed, Amsterdamsche Wissclbank, expressly declared, and
became a bank of issue only in a limited sense, through the fact that it issued transferable credits for
specie or bullion deposited with it, while these passed into general circulation as "bank money." At the
bank one could either exchange specie or bullion for 'bank money," or "bank money" for specie.
The analogy of these functions is found in the United States Treasury, which issues Treasury notes
for bullion and coin, and coins for Treasury notes, and not in the bank-note of modern times, which is a
bank's promissory demand note, payable to bearer. The loans made by the Bank of Amsterdam to the city
of Amsterdam, above noted, by issuing its specie credits in exchange for deposited collateral, were analogous
to some of the loan operations of modern banks, but these transactions were anomalous and not con-
templated among its designed functions; while its unsecured loans to individuals and the East India Com-
pany, by issuing credits, or "bank paper," in excess of the bullion deposited, were most irregular, as the
bank received nothing in exchange on which it could realize the amount of the loans in case they were
unpaid. It would be an analogous performance for the United States Treasury to issue fiat Treasury
ki
must suffer.
It is an interesting consideration, on the other hand, that the legitimate exchanges of the Bank of
Amsterdam were the kind of banking operations with which the early merchants of New Amsterdam, now
New York, were familiar. F. A.
[198]
BANKERS AND BANKING IN THE MIDDLE AGES
was removed, but when the freedom of the city was re-established the
bank resumed business with unimpaired credit, and what had been
carried away by the French Army was made good, in 1816, by a
transfer of French securities. Of all the exchange banks, the Bank
of Hamburg survived the longest. Its existence was closed by the
act of the German Parliament, which, creating a new monetary sys-
tem for Germany, ordered that the bank should liquidate its accounts
by February 15, 1873.
The Bank of Sweden (the Riksbcmk) was founded November 30,
1656, by a Swede named Palmstruch. It has always, from its com-
mencement, been the state bank of Sweden, and is still in operation,
being probably the oldest bank in existence in Europe today. To
Palmstruch is attributed the first issue of bank notes in amounts con-
siderably in excess of the coin held in reserve to redeem them. By an
cmjuete, made by the French government in 1729, the priority of
Sweden in this matter was recognized and the bank-note was declared
to be an admirable Swedish invention, designed to facilitate trade.
The first bank-note was issued by the Riksbank in 1658.
j]2ote top jFtanfc flllaben
A word may be added to the above references to the prejudices
against "usury" in the Middle Ages. In all ages the conscience of
mankind has condemned the extortioner, who wrings out of man's
necessity exorbitant taxes for the use of money, and no laws are more
stringent than ours today in outlawing the "loan-shark." We need
not wonder, then, that usury was indiscriminately condemned in
mediaeval times, when extortion was the rule.
On the other hand we must acknowledge that churchmen were
among the very first to distinguish between the vastly different prin-
ciples of investment for "interest" and loans to extort what we now
style "usury." "The rigors of the Church were directed primarily
against loans for consumption to persons in need," says Conant, while
he continues, citing Rambaud, that "as early as the Thirteenth Cen-
tury, Albert le Grand conceded that 'if usury is against the perfec-
tion of Christian law, it is at least not contrary to civic interests/ '
while "St. Thomas [Aquinas] admitted the loss resulting (dammim
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
enter gens) to the lender who was kept out of his money, and the inter-
val of time and the value lost (quantum ejus inter er at} gave birth to
the word interest as a substitute for usury (usura)."
In short, in the loan of money, business and philanthropy should
not be confused or mixed. The law of Moses indeed recognized this
distinction by fully sanctioning money-loaning on interest in the ordi-
nary course of business, while prohibiting the exaction of interest
when relieving distress. Similarly, in the New Testament, we have
the clearest possible distinction. At the approach of distress we are
enjoined to "give to him that asketh thee, and from him that would
borrow of thee turn not thou away" (Matt. 5 142) ; and we are warned
concerning the great bankrupt, forgiven a debt of five hundred pence,
who takes by the throat the little bankrupt, who owes him fifty.
While, on the other hand, he with talents, who does not put out at
interest the funds entrusted to him, receives punishment and the
rebuke, "I should have received mine own with usury" (Matt. 25 127) .
Yet only in modern times has the full measure of responsibility
enjoined in this parable begun to dawn upon us in the possibilities of
the principle of capital and interest, capital becoming the "silent part-
ner" in every enterprise of man, in which it has the silent partner's
"interest," in proportion to its value. On the principle of capital and
interest the products of man's life can be accumulated and stored,
from generation to generation, not as the miser hoards unproductive
gold, but like the store of material energy in the world, transfused
from one form of power into another form, and continually thrown
back into the channels of life to do the world's work and conserve
its values. And when we all learn how to acquire an "interest" in
every good work, moral and spiritual, by loaning all our surplus
energy, as we loan on interest our surplus capital, the full measure of
responsibility suggested in the parable will be achieved in the world.
[200]
I'NITED STATES STKA.MSHir. ' \V( -I.V Kl; I N ! :. K >KM KKI.Y THK "M H'H K !A V
From a photograph taken In 1892.
[201]
LiECK VIEW, TAKEN IN 1870. OF THE UNITED STATES STEAMSHIP "MICHIGAN," NOW THE
WOLVERINE," SHOWING TO THE RIGHT AND FRONT OFFICER GRIDLEY, WHO FIRED THE
FIRST SHOT IN THE BATTLE OF MANILA, WHKN ADMIRAL DEWEY SAID, "YOU MAY
FIRE WHEN YOU GET READY, GRIDLEY."
The "Michigan," now the "Wolverine," was the first iron vessel launched upon the Great Lakes.
The iron for her hull, engines, boilers, etc.. was cast In Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and carried in
s.-cti.ms to Krie. Pennsylvania, where the ship was launched on December 5, 1843. She i.s still In
service, propelled by original engines, being used as a training ship by the Pennsylvania Naval
Reserve at Erie.
[204]
VOLUME XIV
NINETEEN TWENTY
NUMBER 4
FOURTH QUARTER
BT
CHARLES NEVERS HOLMES
What Epochs have men planned and wrought since then!
That slow birth of our Nation in the war
Of Concord Bridge to Yorktown, when a youth,
Forsaking France, hearth, friends and titled ease,
Fought bravely at the side of Washington.
How many years ago it seems since he,
Survivor of a frenzied feud at home,
Of battlefield and durance long abroad,
Then highly honored by his countrymen,
Again returned, like absent, well-loved son
Revisits kith and kin, to this our Land,
Revered and feted by its citizens.
Courageous, righteous, courteous, sincere,
A noble man of France, grand Lafayette !
[205]
om ^fyoutti ijtatonj Hank Nrat to
Haaljingtott Among tty
of (Pur Har for
BY
THE REVEREND GEORGE ISRAEL BROWNE, M. A.
Rector of St. John's Church, Lancaster, Pennsylvania; Member of
The National Historical Society
HE great modern historian of Rome, Ferrero, has said
somewhere, that the history of the Roman Empire
ought to be re-written for each generation, for each
will see new things in it, and see it in a new way ; see
it from a different angle, gain a fresh lesson from
it, and find in it some peculiar illustration of its own
problems, to throw light upon the mistakes of the past, the tendencies
of the present, and the probabilities of the future.
This is also peculiarly true of our own Colonial and Revolutionary
eras. Some day, perhaps, it will be seen to have had a value for man-
kind almost equal to Roman history it may be, even greater. We
have not yet done conclusive historical work on all the aspects and
personages of our Epic Era, and it is "epic" to a degree and to an
extent that we have not yet soberly begun to realize.
We find, too, strange modern survivals of persistent tendencies
to create myth and folklore, and the instinct to seize on a few pictur-
esque details in our early traditions, ignoring to an equal degree the
great body of other facts which are overshadowed by such treatment,
so that we lose a true prospective. Then, too, local, family, state, and
civic partialities and predilections keep alive some memories to the
exclusion of others : time and chance seem to have their will.
We propose to outline a fresh treatment of one of the most inter-
esting personages of our early history, in the form of a series of ques-
tions.
[206]
WHOM SHOULD HISTORY RANK NEXT TO WASHINGTON
It would be interesting to discover what percentage of our citi-
zens, even of our fairly well educated ones, could answer each of these
questions if put to them separately, as of a different person. Of
course, we suppose the accumulation of them will suggest the soldier
in mind to most people. But test yourself as you read them.
1. Who ranked next to General Washington as Senior Major
General in the Continental Army?
2. Who was the subject of the first American biography? Of
whom, during the first one hundred years of our National history,
were nearly as many biographies written as of Washington himself?
3. Who was at Ticonderoga, Detroit, Fort William and Henry,
Fort Edward ; helped in a naval battle on Lake Ontario ; was captured
by the Indians, tied to the stake to be burned; taken a prisoner to
Quebec and Montreal ; shipwrecked on the coast of Cuba ; commanded
Colonial troops at the capture of Havana all before his part in the
War of Independence?
4. Who made a longer, harder ride after the news of the Battle
of Lexington to help secure its results, than Paul Revere did to warn
the Minute Men to prepare for it with a well-known dramatic episode
connected therewith, all unsung by the poets?
5. Who planned and fought the Battle of Bunker Hill?
6. Who, being well-known to and a companion in arms of many
of the British officers, was offered the rank of Major General among
them, and a large pecuniary reward, if he would desert the side of the
Colonists?
7. About whose part in the most famous battle of the American
Revolution has raged a literary contest, and an historical controversy,
which has elicited more facts about that event than any other, includ-
ing affidavits of then living soldiers?
8. Who was born in one State, fought as soldier from another,
and was attacked, after his death, by an officer of a third New
England State, defended by his son and other leading men of his
native State?
9. What two Generals were of the same name and family in
our struggle for freedom?
10. Who commanded one of the two concentration camps during
the winter of Valley Forge?
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
11. Who selected West Point as a military spot, where today
exists the remains of a fort bearing his name?
12. Who was the one General, compelled by the disabilities of
age, to retire before the intervention of the French, the hopeful turn
of affairs, and the successful conclusion of our struggle for Liberty,
therefore, dropping out of sight in the glorification of its termination,
also being absent when Washington founded the Cincinnati and said
farewell to his officers?
There are deeply significant comments to be properly made on
each of these questions, which make in their total a sum of fascinating
details, that strikingly illuminate the side currents, as well as the
main stream, of our National history.
Here are the answers:
Question i. Who ranked next to Washington?
On the granite slabs forming part of the pedestal for the eques-
trian statue of Israel Putnam, erected by the State at Brooklyn, Con-
necticut, is the epitaph, written by President Dwight, of Yale College,
copied from the original stone, now (all hacked and scarred by relic
hunters), protected behind oak and glass in the battle- flag wing of the
Capitol at Hartford. The opening words of the epitaph are these :
"To the Memory of Israel Putnam, Esquire,
Senior Major General in the Armies
of
The United States of America."
"On July 4th," says Livingston, author of one of the later lives of
Putnam, "just one year before the memorable day of the Declaration
of Independence, Washington, on his arrival at Cambridge, issued the
following in General Orders, about two weeks after the Battle of
Bunker Hill
" The Hon. Artemus Ward, Charles Lee, Philip Schuy-
ler and Israel Putnam, Esq., are appointed Major Generals
of the American Army, by the Honorable Continental Con-
gress, and due obedience is to be paid to them as such.' '
[208]
WHOM SHOULD HISTORY RANK NEXT TO WASHINGTON
Of these, Putnam, alone, had received the unanimous vote of
Congress, and was given his commission by Washington at once. The
others he withheld for a time, because of the jealousies aroused among
some of the officers who thought themselves overlooked. Even Put-
nam was the victim of like passions. He had just been appointed
Brigadier General by the Legislature of the Connecticut Colony, but
there were others who had outranked him on the Colonial basis. Some
of them left Cambridge without even bidding farewell to Washington,
throwing up their Commissions in the Army by reason of the fancied
slight, but were, ere long, persuaded to return to the Service.
Washington wrote Congress upon the matter, informing it that
he had given his Commission to General Putnam alone, on whose
account, also, one officer had left the Army, "Without visiting me, or
making known his intentions in any respect."
Silas Dean, the Connecticut delegate, heard this letter of Wash-
ington read before Congress in Philadelphia, and said in a letter writ-
ten soon afterward that the members had greatly disapproved of this
officer's conduct. The same author was elated by the honor won for
his Colony and country by "the brave intrepidity of old General Put-
nam/' on whom, he says, "by every account of the battle, the whole
Army had depended ever since the Lexington battle." With high
pride, Deane penned: "Putnam's merit rang through the Continent:
his fame still increases, and every day justifies the unanimous
applause of the Continent. Let it be remembered, that he had every
vote of Congress ; and his health has been the second or third at almost
all our tables in this City. But it seems that he does not wear a large
wig, nor screw his countenance into the form that belies the sentiments
of his generous soul ; he is no adept either at political or religious
canting or cozening ; he is no shake-hand body ; he is therefore totally
unfit for everything but fighting; that department T never heard that
these intriguing gentry wanted to interfere with him in. I have scarce
any patience. O Heaven! blast, I implore thee, every such narrow,
selfish, envious manoeuvre in the land, nor let one succeed far enough
to stain the fair page of American politics." (Collections of the Con-
necticut Historical Society, Vol. II ; Collections of the New York
Historical Society, Vol. XIX.)
Question 2. A. Who was the subject of the first American biog-
[209!
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
raphy? B. Of whom were nearly as many "lives" written as of Gen-
eral Washington himself?
A. Israel Putnam was the subject of the first American biog-
raphy. So says Colonel David Humphreys in the Preface to his "Life
of the Honorable Major General Putnam," an essay addressed to the
Society of the Cincinnati in Connecticut. These are the words he
uses : "The enclosed manuscript justly claims indulgence for its venal
errors, as it is the first effort at biography that has been made on this
Continent."
All the circumstances and the relations of the author to his sub-
ject are filled with a very deep and varied significance. Colonel
Humphreys had been aide on Putnam's staff and wrote the book at
Mount Vernon while a member of Washington's household. He had
special fitness for his task, and his own career is interesting. He grad-
uated at Yale College at the age of nineteen, in 1771, and was a fellow-
student with Trumbull, Dwight, and Barlow, afterwards forming a
little coterie of literary men called the "Hartford Wits."
He entered the Army as Captain, was soon promoted to rank of
Major in General Putnam's Brigade, and was on the retreat from New
York in 1776. Soon after, he was appointed aide-de-camp to General
Putnam. Later, he served as aide to General Greene. In 1780, he
was appointed aide and Secretary to General Washington soon after,
joining Washington's family, and remaining with him till the close of
the war. At the siege of Yorktown, he held a separate command, and
when Lord Cornwallis surrendered to the American forces in 1781,
Colonel Humphreys had the distinguished honor of receiving the
Colors, and, as a mark of approbation, was made the bearer of the
same from the Commander-in-Chief to Congress, taking with him
copies of the returns of prisoners, arms, ordnance, and twenty-five
stands of surrendered Colors, and carrying also to Congress a letter
from Washington commending the bearer to that honorable body.
Therefrom resulted the presentation of an elegant sword to the gen-
tleman in question.
When General Washington surrendered his Commission at An-
napolis in 1783, he was attended on that memorable occasion by
Colonel Humphreys, who, at Washington's special request, accom-
panied him from Annapolis to Mount Vernon.
[210]
WHOM SHOULD HISTORY RANK NEXT TO WASHINGTON
In 1784, Humphreys was appointed by Congress, Secretary to the
"Commission for Negotiating Treaties of Commerce with Foreign
Powers," the Commissioners being John Adams, Benjamin Franklin,
and Thomas Jefferson.
After two years abroad, Humphreys returned to America and
again visited Washington at Mount Vernon. In 1789, he was
appointed first American Minister to Portugal, afterwards being
transferred to Spain, where he married, in Lisbon, 1797, Ann Frances
Bukley, daughter of a wealthy English banker.
In the War of 1812, he was made Brigadier General of Connect!
cut Militia, and served in the State Legislature.
He received from three American Colleges, the honorary degree
of Doctor of Laws, and was a member of the Academy of Sciences of
Philadelphia and of the Royal Society of London.
It is, perhaps, well to know what his qualifications for writing
of the first American biography were, and what was the motive behind
his work.
From the preface to William Cutter's "Life of Israel Putnam,
Major General in the Army of the American Revolution," I quote the
following extract:
"Among the multitude of letters which might be referred to, an
extract from one only will be given. It was addressed to Colonel
Humphreys in Europe, under date of the 25th of July, 1780. General
Washington, apparently in reply to a suggestion from Humphreys
that he (Washington) should apply himself to preparing Commen-
taries upon the Revolutionary War, says:
" 'In a former letter, I informed you, my dear Humphreys, that
if I had talents for it, I had no leisure to turn my thoughts to Com-
mentaries. I should be pleased indeed to see you undertake this busi-
ness. Your abilities as a writer, your discernment respecting the
principles which led to the decision of arms, your personal knowledge
of many facts as they occurred in the progress of the War, your dis-
position to justice, candor, and impartiality, and your diligence in
investigating truth, all combining, fit you, when joined with the vigor
of life, for the task.
" 1 should, with great pleasure, not only give you the perusal of
all my papers, but any oral information of circumstances, which cannot
[211]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
be obtained from them, that my memory will furnish ; and I can with
great truth add, that my house will not only be at your service, during
the period of your preparing this work, but (I say it without an
unmeaning compliment) I should be exceedingly happy, if you would
make it your home. You might have an apartment to yourself, in
which you could command your own time.
'You would be considered and treated as one of the family, and
meet with that cordial reception and entertainment, which are char-
acteristic of the sincerest friendship.' '
Colonel Humphreys returned home in May, 1786, after which, he
was often at Mount Vernon, a member of Washington's family. It
was there that he wrote the "Life of General Putnam" in 1788, under
the eye of Washington, and with the best possible means of knowing
that great man's opinion of the subject of his work.
The work was written for the Society of the Cincinnati of Con-
necticut, and by them, and under their sanction, presented to the world.
The Society was composed of surviving officers of the Revolution,
comrades and compeers of Putnam. He had not only his own mem-
ories of Putnam's life, and his stories, but he visited him in order to
verify his narrative.
"It would appear, however," says Cutter, "that Putnam was not
disposed to estimate his own services very highly, or to present in very
strong colors his own acts of heroism ; since Colonel Humphreys, who
gathered much of his material from personal conversations with his
subject, is far more modest and unpretending in many of his state-
ments, than authentic documents, furnished by both friends and foes
of that period, would warrant."
Now there is a touch to stir our imagination, if we ever try to
re-construct the data of Putnam's own inner consciousness. This life
appeared while Putnam was still living two years before his death.
What a pity 'tis, we have no legend or tradition of his receipt of the
first copy or of his reading it !
(B) Surprising as the statement may seem, there were as many
"lives" written of Israel Putnam as of Washington himself, till the
steady stream of later years placed our first President in the lead.
There was, to begin with, Humphreys' first American biography,
published at Hartford, in 1788, re-printed several times, one edition in
[212]
WHOM SHOULD HISTORY RANK NEXT TO WASHINGTON
New York in 1810, to which was annexed two poems by Humphreys,
"An Address to the Armies of the United States," and "A Poem to
the Happiness of America/' which strikingly convey to us a sense of
the fervor and ardor and very atmosphere of those days. Still another
edition was published in Boston, in 1818, with notes and additions,
and an appendix containing an historical and topographical sketch of
Bunker Hill Battle by Colonel Samuel Swett. It is not known how
many other editions there may have been.
These successive "lives" are splendid illustrations of the growth
and change in scholarship and the changing attitude of the American
mind, and may be listed as follows: Humphreys, with its evident
recollections of classical models; the one by William Cutter, New
York, 1847, freer, easier in style, with unrestrained enthusiasm; one
by George Canning Hill, Boston, 1858, with still another viewpoint;
Peabody's, in Sparks' Library of American Biography, characteristic
of the whole ; that by Increase N. Tarbox, a careful writer and trained
historian and antiquarian, with its forceful treatment of original
documents, and written with especial reference to the Battle of Bunker
Hill ; and, finally, a wholly modern one by William Farrand Living-
ston, New York, 1905, in the "American Men of Energy" Series,
making use of much new material, well-balanced, cool and dispas-
sionate.
John Fiske and all the historians, of course, treat of him, more or
less, according to the needs of their task; and there have been many
children's "lives" of Putnam written in juvenile style.
Livingston gives an interesting list of early portraits and prints
of the General, some appearing in London and Paris as early as 1775
and mentions one whose title unhesitatingly reads: "Israel Putnam
Esq., Major General of the Connecticut Forces and Commander-in-
Chief at the Engagement on Buncker's Hill, near Boston, June 17,
1 775-"
Question 3. Who was at Ticonderoga, Detroit, a prisoner at
Montreal and Quebec, etc., shipwrecked on Cuba, at Capture of
Havanna, all before his part in the War of '76?
There has been an unnatural cleavage in the continuity of our
historical consciousness as a people, between our Colonial and Revolu-
tionary eras. A false and disconnected emphasis has been placed, in
[213]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
turn, upon each separately. Even the existence and activities of our
various historical, patriotic, and hereditary societies have tended to
exaggerate and perpetuate this disconnected and separate emphasis.
The Colonial Societies confine themselves rigidly to the Pre-Revolu-
tionary epochs, while the Revolutionary Societies place their emphasis
and restrict their attention wholly to the Post-Colonial life.
There were many men, of course, whose careers were confined,
so far as their public activities, at least, were concerned, to one or the
other of these marked historical epochs. But there were others who
played varied and complex parts in both. This is pre-eminently true
of Israel Putnam. Of no other of the Revolutionary Generals is this
equally true, and we make no exception even of Washington himself,
though his part placed him at the strategic centre of events.
The mere catalogue of events treated in the text as given in the
Index of Livingston's Life, shows the marvellous extent and range of
his participation in nearly all our earlier struggles. These are some
extracts :
Enlists in French and Indiana War, 1755.
In Crown Point Expedition.
In Battle of Lake George.
Receives Commission as Second Lieutenant.
Becomes a Ranger.
Scouting expedition to Ticonderoga.
Saves Roger's Life.
Perilous experiences.
Reconnoitres near South Bay.
On Winter duty.
Attempts to relieve Dyer.
Returns home.
Rewarded by General Assembly.
Appointed Captain.
At Fort Edward.
Kills an Indian. (This story ought to be told in full.)
Takes a prisoner.
Pursues French plunderers.
Encounters the enemy.
Reconnoitres Ticonderoga.
Patrols woods.
At Fort Edward, 1757.
Moonlight battle.
Repels attack on workmen.
Escorts General Webb to Fort William Henry.
Discovers hostile force on Lake George.
Ordered back to Fort Edward.
Hears distant bombardment.
Visits scene of massacre.
Becomes acquainted with Lord Howe.
[214]
WHOM SHOULD HISTORY RANK NEXT TO WASHINGTON
Saves Fort Edward from fire.
Reconnoitres Northward.
Returns home.
Appointed Major.
In expedition to Ticonderoga.
In skirmish.
Mourns death of Lord Howe.
Shows kindness to wounded enemy.
Renders efficient aid during assault on French works.
Covers retreat.
Returns with main army to head of Lake George.
Escapes down rapids of Hudson.
In Roger's party against French plunderers.
Surprised by an ambuscade; made prisoner; tied to a tree; cruelly treated; led into
forest to be burned alive.
Rescued; taken to Ticonderoga.
In presence of Montcalm.
Sent to Montreal; receives sympathetic attention from Schuyler.
Transferred to Quebec, exchanged.
Cares for Howe's family on homeward journey.
Appointed Lieutenant-Colonel.
Superintends work of Connecticut Regiment near Lake George.
In another expedition against Ticonderoga and Crown Point
Assists in repairing and rebuilding captured forts.
Returns home.
With Amherst's Army against Montreal.
Disables a French warship.
His novel project for capture of Fort Lewis.
On the dangerous passage down the rapids of the St Lawrence.
Rejoices on surrender of Montreal.
Cordially greeted by his former captor.
Again at home.
In last campaign of French and Indian war.
On duty at Ticonderoga and Crown Point.
Acting Colonel of Connecticut Regiment in expedition against Havana.
Presence of mind in storm at sea.
Participates in attack on Moro Castle.
A sharer in prize money.
Goes into country to buy fresh provisions.
Embarks for home, taking Cuban negro.
Works on farm.
In Bradstreet's expedition in Pontiac's War.
Meets again the Indian Chief.
Reaches Fort Niagara.
Assists in building Fort Erie.
Arrives at Detroit.
Embarks with Bradstreet's troops for Sandusky.
Hardships on Lake Erie and Ontario.
Reaches home bereaved of wife and daughter.
Joins Congregational Church.
A leader of Sons of Liberty.
Interviews Governor Fitch at Hartford.
Chairman of Committee on Correspondence.
Representative to General Assembly.
Second marriage to Mrs. Deborah Avery Gardiner.
His Diary at New York and on Voyage to Pensacola.
Explores Mississippi as far North as Yazoo.
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
Visits Jamaica.
Voyage homeward.
Sympathizes with Massachusetts patriots.
Goes to Boston with letter and flock of sheep.
Interviews British officers.
Then the catalogue goes on, but is too voluminous to quote.
Question 4. Who made a longer ride to secure the results of the
Battle of Lexington than Paul Revere did to warn the Minute Men to
get ready for it?
Bancroft puts Putnam's ride at one hundred miles in eighteen
hours. This, too, has been a matter of discussion, fortunately, as
always, for so the real facts are threshed out to final conclusions.
Tarbox, in his "Life of Putnam," says:
"Governor Ingersoll, of Connecticut, at the Concord Centennial,
on April I9th, 1875, made the statement in his speech that Putnam
was at Concord on the 2ist of April. The statement was doubted.
Judge Hoar thought it could not be so. Governor Ingersoll rested
upon Hollister's History of Connecticut for his authority, but would
not insist upon it in the presence of those who might be supposed to be
better informed."
"Here, again, we get an example of the quite natural indifference
or rather minor degree of interest which the students of history of
one locality display toward the story of those who come from other
parts.
Continuing, Tarbox relates of Governor Ingersoll: "He went
home, however, and consulted that indefatigable antiquarian, J. Ham-
mond Trumbull, L.L.D., of Hartford, Conn., close relative of the
one only Colonial Governor who sided with the Patriots, Jonathan
Trumbull (the original of "Brother Jonathan"), in whose War Office
at Lebanon, Washington, Putnam and others met frequently, and of
whom Washington was accustomed to say, when in doubt, 'Let us
consult Brother Jonathan!' Dr. Trumbull immediately found and
produced a copy of an old Norwich paper containing Putnam's letter
written at Concord, April 2ist, and published at Norwich, Sunday,
April 23rd."
Then Trumbull repeated the fact, also attested by Putnam's son,
Daniel, which has become one of the most picturesque episodes of our
history.
WHOM SHOULD HISTORY RANK NEXT TO WASHINGTON
"When the news of the fight at Lexington and Concord reached
Pomfret, Israel Putnam," says his biographer, Colonel Humphreys,
"left his plow in the middle of the field, and without waiting to change
his clothes, mounted on his horse and set out for the scenes of action."
He was in Concord the second day after the Battle, and the same day,
April 21, after a conference with the Massachusetts Committee of
Safety, he wrote to Connecticut to advise the Governor and Council
what was to be the Colony's quota to be raised for the Army in New
England.
"These facts seem to have escaped the notice of our historians,
and at the late Centennial Celebration in Concord, Governor Inger-
soll's allusion to Putnam's visit in 1775, did not pass unquestioned.
Paul Revere's ride," says Tarbox, "is made famous by its circum-
stances and the dangers that encompassed him, and especially, by the
pen of the poet who has glorified it." (Just suppose Holmes had
matched Longfellow's poem on Paul Revere, with one on Putnam, but
alas! he was a Connecticut man, and the motive was lacking!) "But
here," says Tarbox again, "was a ride not attended with any such
present dangers, but involving marvellous powers of endurance in a
heavy man of fifty-seven years of age. But the story is not all told
yet. The same day that he reached Cambridge, he was also in Con-
cord, and probably returned to Cambridge that same night."
Question 5. Who planned and fought the Battle of Bunker Hill?
They all fought it. There was no controversy on the field as to
who commanded. That came afterward ; but there is no doubt as to
who planned it. Colonel Prescott has been made the victim of his
friends, or rather, the friends of his family, a too zealous friendship,
long after his death. He was an honorable man and a good soldier,
and commanded with valor the Massachusetts troops, and deserves all
the credit due him for his part ; but no one dreamed of claiming, till
years afterward, that he commanded at Bunker Hill.
In the Council of War at Cambridge, both Generals Ward and
Warren opposed Putnam's plan of fortifying Breed's Hill. Daniel
Putnam reports the discussion at length. "Warren," he said, after
giving the preliminary conversation, "rose and walked several times
across the room, leaned a few minutes over the back of a chair in a
thoughtful attitude and said, 'Almost thou persuadest me, General
Putnam, but I must still think the project a rash one.' '
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
We cannot be too grateful to Increase N. Tarbox, the careful and
skilled historian, for his elaborate study of the whole story in his
"Life," written because of a desire to present the whole truth of the
matter of who planned and fought the Battle of Bunker Hill. It would
be ungrateful to condense it, cruel to abridge it. This reference to it
must suffice.
At any rate, it was Putnam who gave the command, "Do not fire
.till you see the whites of their eyes;" who insisted on the fortification
of Breed's Hill; who constantly rode back and forth across the Neck,
raked by British cannon balls to seek and bring up reinforcements;
who fired the last cannon with his own hands ; who was first on the
field and last to leave it.
It may be said that Israel Putnam did not stand alone among his
family in patriotic zeal and devotion, for the Putnams were always
martial. Lists may be seen of eighty-six Putnams who hastened to
Lexington from various Massachusetts towns. Henry Putnam was at
Lexington with seven sons, and lost his life on the field. Over one
hundred Putnams were in the Continental Army and, at least three
hundred fought for the Union in the Civil War.
Question 6. Who was offered the rank of Major General in the
British Army?
Twice in Putnam's life did he request another officer, whose
worth and life he valued, not to expose himself with him, and both
these men, refusing, met their deaths.
It was in the attack on Ticonderoga that Lord Howe, brother of
the General, in command at Boston, and by far the more attractive
character of the two, met his death. He was much beloved by the
Colonial troops, and it has been said, had he lived, there would have
been no Revolution.
Humphreys narrates the incident.
"Putnam," said Lord Howe, "what means that firing?" Their
column was advancing with others, through the thick wood. "I know
not, but with your Lordship's leave, will see," replied the former. "I
will accompany you," said the gallant young nobleman. In vain did
Major Putnam attempt to dissuade him by saying, "My Lord, if I am
killed, the loss of my life will be of little consequence, but the preserva-
tion of yours is of infinite importance to this Army." The only
WHOM SHOULD HISTORY RANK NEXT TO WASHINGTON
answer was, "Putnam, your life is as dear to you as mine is to me; I
am determined to go." In the skirmish that followed, it was Howe
that received the fatal wound.
Again, at Bunker Hill, Putnam begged Warren to leave the field,
but it was he who escaped and Warren who was killed.
He saved the life of Major Small in the same fight, throwing up
the muskets of his men when he saw them leveled at the breast of
the British officer, exclaiming, as he did so, "My God, spare that man.
I love him as a brother!" Small acknowledged the generosity by a
bow as he retired. Afterward, they met under a flag of truce, and
Small had a chance to express his appreciation.
There was then more than the refusal of reward and recognition
on the British side to emphasize the depth of his sincere loyalty to the
American cause. It was the severing of many friendships. It was
to battle against former comrades in arms, for he was popular among
them, even as among his own men. Not only did they desire to weaken
the leadership of the rebel armies, but they wanted him for his own
sake. Never, for one instant, did Putnam hesitate or waver in his
firm confidence in the rightfulness of his stand. The attempt was
made, however, to win him from it.
The British Commander, Gaq'e, having learned that his personal
friend of the French and Indian War was a leader in the Army
besieging Boston, "found the means," according to Colonel Humph-
reys, "to convey a proposal privately to General Putnam, that if he
would relinquish the rebel party, he might rely upon being made a
Major General in the British establishment, and receiving a great
pecuniary compensation for his services. General Putnam spurned
the offer, which, however, he thought prudent at that time, to conceal
from public notice." Such efforts of the British General to break the
rebellion were in vain. A similar offer was made to General Stark of
New Hampshire.
The following anecdote, told by his son, Colonel Daniel Putnam,
discloses the true state of Putnam's mind. "From the arrival of
Washington at Cambridge, till the enemy left Boston, his and Wash-
ington's military families were not only on the most friendly terms,
but their intercourse was most frequent. Not a week passed but they
dined together at the quarters of one or the other. One day in the
[219]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
month of September (1775) General Washington gave at his table
for a toast, "A speedy and honorable peace," and all appeared to join
with good will in the sentiment. Not many days after, at Putnam's
quarters, addressing himself to Washington, he said, "Your Excel-
lency the other day gave us 'a speedy and honorable peace' and I, as
in duty bound, drank it ; but now, I hope, Sir, you will not think it an
act of insubordination if I ask you to drink one of rather different
character. I will, give you, Sir, 'A long and moderate war.' '
"It has been truly said of Washington that he seldom smiled, and
almost never laughed, but the sober and sententious manner in which
Putnam delivered his sentiment, and its seeming contradiction to all
his practice, came so unexpectedly on Washington, that he did laugh
more heartily than I ever remember to have seen him before or after ;
but presently he said, 'You are the last man, General Putnam, from
whom I should have expected such a toast, you who are all the time
urging vigorous measures, to plead now for a long, and what is still
more extraordinary, a moderate war, seems strange, indeed.' Putnam
replied, that the measures he advised were calculated to prevent, not
hasten a peace, which would only be a rotten thing, and last no longer
than it divided us. 'I expect nothing' (said Putnam) 'but a long war,
and I would have it a moderate one, that we may hold out till the
Mother Country becomes willing to cast us off forever.' Washington
did not soon forget this toast. For years after, and more than once,
he reminded Putnam of it."
This was in the first year of the War. The same son records
how Putnam, before Bunker Hill, in moods of abstraction, used to
talk aloud to himself : "We must go there;" "we must go in the night ;"
"I know 'em of old they fire without aim," etc., etc.
Question 7. Whose part in the most famous battle of the Ameri-
can Revolution has caused the greatest historical controversy resulting
therefrom?
Justin Winsor, Librarian of Harvard, in his "Narrative and
Critical History of America," gives a complete summary of all the
literary references, papers, addresses, and books on both sides of the
question. It is a not wholly creditable story. The friends of Putnam,
however, can be unreservedly glad that the question was raised when
and as pointedly and bitterly as it was. It came in time to evoke sworn
affidavits of soldiers still living who had been present in the battle.
[220]
WHOM SHOULD HISTORY RANK NEXT TO WASHINGTON
"The whole matter," says Livingston, "is at bottom a question of
Colonial jealousy between Massachusetts and Connecticut, stirred into
renewed flame by the chance it gave a few people in New Hampshire
to reveal some slumbering embers of the same human prejudice. Even
so good men as the Starks seem not to have been entirely free from it,
but it was General Dearborn who so tremendously overshot his mark,
going so far as to make the claim (so absurd that it was almost funny)
'that Putnam was a coward/ '
The account of our hero in the new edition of the Encyclopaedia
Britannica, a characteristically English production not supposed to be
especially enthusiastic on American affairs, ends with this passage:
"Putnam was a brave, intrepid and very industrious soldier,
rather than a great General, but his fame in the Indian Wars, his per-
sonal courage, his bluff heartiness and his good fellowship made him
the idol of the rank and file, and he is one of the popular heroes of
American history. He seems to have taken no part in the political
manoeuvreings and cabals which busied many officers in the Ameri-
can Army."
Colonel Samuel Adams Drake, the eminent historian, says that
Putnam "was beyond question the foremost man of that army in
embryo, which assembled at Cambridge after the battle of Lexington.
Not Ward, or Thomas, or Pomeroy, or even the lamented Warren,
possessed its confidence to the degree that Putnam did."
'Yet," says Eben Putnam, "it was this unbounded popularity and
the high promotion which accompanied it, which he never meanly
sought for himself or grudged to others, that inspired with a feeling
of jealousy and envy, certain military officers whose unfriendly spirit
was never wholly repressed or concealed while yet he lived, but broke
forth with peculiar violence long after his death, and when most of
those who knew him best and loved him most were in their graves."
It was only a few months after the death of Colonel Humphreys,
Putnam's earliest biographer, that the attack on Putnam culminated
in a work of General Wilkinson, of \\hich nobody even hears now, and
which McMaster, in his "History of the United States," justly
describes as his "three ponderous volumes of memoirs, as false as any
yet written by man."
General Dearborn, who corresponded with Wilkinson, also per-
[221]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
mitted himself to publish an attack on Putnam, in which he bewailed
his "extraordinary popularity/' his "universal popularity," his
"ephemeral and unaccountable popularity."
Justin Winsor, in his "Narrative and Critical History of
America," as remarked above, gives in full the whole literary range
and development of the controversy participated in by many writers,
including Daniel Webster himself.
Israel Putnam's youngest son, Colonel Daniel Putnam, an able
and highly esteemed son of the departed veteran, wrote and published,
I think originally in the "Gentleman's Magazine of Philadelphia," an
eloquent and triumphant answer, of which, with another letter from
the same source, John Adams wrote, "neither myself, nor my family,
have been able to read either with dry eyes." "They would do honour
to the pen of a Pliny."
Question 8. Who was born in one Colony, fought as a soldier of
a second, was attacked by a soldier of a third New England State, and
defended by leading men of the State of his birth ?
We will not elaborate : the references in literature are too numer-
ous. It remains only to briefly state the facts. Israel Putnam was
born near Salem, Massachusetts. He early bought land of Governor
Belcher in Pomfret, Connecticut, so lived and died as a citizen of that
State. We have already outlined the matter of the attack on his
memory.
We can learn a little of what the successful consolidation of the
Thirteen Colonies into one Nation saved us from, when we realize,
with some amazement, as we study this phase of our history, the
potentialities of intercolonial jealousy, pride, indifference, and an
incipient antagonism which fortunately was never allowed to do more
than mutter and smoulder. The sense of justice in some of the leading
citizens of Massachusetts has led them to generously repress overt
manifestations of a lesser spirit. Tarbox, Cutter, Swete, Drake, and
Webster have nobly striven to restore the balance of equanimity, even
if, at Concord, they had forgotten, and when the Bunker Hill monu-
ment was dedicated there remained a little over-emphasis on local
descendants. As for New Hampshire and the Starks, there is glory
enough for all, while as to Dearborn, the less said, in this connection,
the better. Daniel Webster himself came to the defense of Putnam,
[222]
WHOM SHOULD HISTORY RANK NEXT TO WASHINGTON
his legal instincts stirred by the manifest injustice of the prejudice
and partiality exhibited. But the time was not ripe for a complete
understanding.
Question 9. What one family furnished two Generals in the
War of '76?
General Rufus Putnam, the engineer officer of the Revolution,
was born in Sutton, Massachusetts, his grandfather being half-brother
to Israel Putnam's father.
In 1898, the Massachusetts Society of the Sons of the Revolution
placed a tablet on the former home of Rufus Putnam, at Rutland, Mas-
sachusetts, the home becoming the property of the Massachusetts
Society. Senator George F. Hoar wrote the inscription and gave an
oration of great historic value, which was a study of the facts noted in
the inscription, giving a new interpretation and a fresh emphasis to
the true significance of his life. This inscription reads:
Here
From 1781 to 1783
Dwelt
General Rufus Putnam
Soldier of the old French War
Engineer of the Works
Which compelled the British Army
to evacuate Boston
and of the Fortifications of
West Point
Founder and Father of Ohio.
In this House
He planned and matured
the scheme of the Ohio Company,
and from it issued the call for the
Convention
which led to its organization
Over this threshold
He went to lead the Company
which settled Marietta, Ohio
April 17, 1788
[223]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
To him, under God, is owing that the
Great North West Territory
was dedicated forever to
Freedom, Education and Religion
and that the
United States of America is not now a
Great Slave-holding Empire.
When Sir William- Howe rubbed his eyes on the morning of
March 5, 1776, looked from Boston over towards Dorchester Heights,
and saw, through the heavy mist, the entrenchments planned and
erected by Rufus Putnam, the exclamation was forced out of him,
"The rebels have done more in a night than my army has in a month."
The whole story is a fascinating one, and Senator Hoar's oration
is worth preserving among the classics of our literature. He spoke
of the fire of patriotism glowing as brightly in the breast of this
young self-taught officer as in the breasts of a Bayard or a Sydney,
saying that "the old French War, with its adventures and escapes
was better for him than a West Point education."
But we are only calling attention to a few landmarks concerning
the Putnam family's service in our history, which he who would
know well his country's story must in no wise forget. The story of
Ohio is a story by itself. Colonel Israel Putnam, eldest son of "Old
Put," with his two sons, joined the Ohio expedition and went with his
relative to found a new State in the West. He went back to bring out
his family a year or so later, and their descendants are still found
there.
A three volume Genealogy of the Putnam family has been written
by Mr. Eben Putnam, of Wellesley, Massachusetts, Editor of the
Genealogical Magazine, and son of Frederick Ward Putnam, for
twenty-five years Professor of American Archaeology and Ethnology
at Harvard University, in which he traces the past of the family in
Buckinghamshire, England, to Sir Roger de Puttenham and back of
him, quoting from Browning's "Americans of Royal Descent," to
Louis IV. of France, Charlemagne, Alfred the Great, and Geoffrey
de Boulogne.
There are fourteen States that have either a county or town bear-
ing the name "Putnam."
[224]
In the Patriotic Societies for both sexes, you will find more
descendants of Israel Putnam, than any other soldier of the Revolu-
tion. James Dixon Browne, Esq., a lawyer of Terre Haute, Indiana,
compiled a manuscript Genealogy of the Putnam ancestry of his
mother, Emily, wife of James Browne, and daughter of Colonel Daniel
Putnam. He prefixed to the record his text from the Scriptures: "And
the children of Israel increased and multiplied abundantly."
Question 10. Who commanded one of the two Concentration
Camps during the Winter of Valley Forge?
It was near Danbury, Connecticut, during the winter of. 1777-
1778. "In order," says David Humphreys, "to cover the country
adjoining the Sound, and to support the garrison of West Point in case
of an attack, Major General Putnam was stationed for the Winter at
Redding, Connecticut.
"He had under his orders, the brigade of New Hampshire, the
two brigades of Connecticut, the corps of Infantry commanded by
Hazen, and that of Cavalry by Sheldon.
"The troops, who had been badly fed, badly clothed and worse
paid, by brooding over their grievances in the leisure and inactivity
of Winter quarters, began to think them intolerable." So they
mutinied. To quote Humphreys: "When word was brought to Gen-
eral Putnam that the two brigades were under arms to march to Hart-
ford to compel the General Assembly to listen to their complaint, he
mounted his horse, galloped to the cantonment, and thus addressed
them :
1 'My brave lads, whither are you going? Do you intend to
desert your officers, and invite the enemy to follow you into the coun-
try? Whose cause have you been fighting and suffering so long in?
Is it not your own ? Have you no property, no parents, wives or chil-
dren? You have behaved like men so far all the world is full of
your praises and posterity will stand astonished at your deeds; but
not if you spoil it all at last. Don't you consider how much the country
is distressed by the War, and that your officers have not been any
better paid than yourselves? Let us all stand by one another, then,
and fight it out like soldiers.'
"When he had done, he directed the acting Major of Brigade to
give the word for them to shoulder, march to their regimental parades
[225]
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
and lodge arms. All which they executed with promptitude and
apparent good humor."
It was about the middle of this winter, when Putnam was on a
visit to his output at Horseneck, with one hundred and fifty men,
that he found Governor Tryon advancing on him with fifteen hundred.
He fired a volley or two, and then, ordering his men to disperse,
secured his own safety by galloping down the famous stone steps,
whither the dragoons were unwilling to follow. They fired on him,
however, and a ball hit his headpiece, which was seen to fly off.
Tryon sent him the next day a new hat, so the story goes. Grim play-
fulness between enemies ! The house from which he saw the English
approaching has been preserved by the Daughters of the American
Revolution of Greenwich, Connecticut, and is open to visitors.
Question n. Who selected West Point as a military spot?
Israel Putnam made the decision, not, however, without asking
counsel of others in authority, but against the advice of the French
engineers called in consultation. (Livingston's Life, page 370.) The
ruins of the old Fort up the hillside above the new chapel of the Mili-
tary Academy still bears the name "Fort Putnam."
Colonel Humphreys, who was on the spot at the time, claims for
General Putnam the whole merit for the selection of this post, and
adds: "It is no vulgar praise to say, that to him belongs the glory of
having chosen this rock of our military salvation The British,
who considered this post as a sort of American Gibraltar, never
attempted it, but by the treachery of an American officer." For West
Point was the key to the Hudson, and it was the prize the British
sought at the price of making Benedict Arnold a traitor.
Question 12. Who was the one General compelled by the infirm-
ities of age to retire, all unwillingly, before the conclusion of the War,
but with a long military career behind him ?
Generals Greene and Anthony Wayne were younger men by
nearly thirty years than this old veteran, and gained their spurs in
reaching their military maturity during the War of the Revolution.
Putnam had already grown grey in the Seven Years' War, and served
in many successive campaigns. He reached his military maturity at
the Battle of Bunker Hill. He was fourteen years older than Wash-
ington himself, and was the most active commander at Boston until
Washington came.
[226]
WHOM SHOULD HISTORY RANK NEXT TO WASHINGTON
In December, 1779, after a visit at home, Putnam set out on
horseback to re-join the Army. On the road between Pomfret and
Hartford, he suffered a stroke of paralysis, which affected his whole
right side, and, struggle against it as he might, he was compelled to
realize that his military days were over. The iron frame that had
been subjected to the strains of the days of his Indian fighting, of his
French imprisonment and shipwreck at Havana, succumbed after
three years of more continuous service. He was an old man even at
the Battle of Bunker Hill.
This meant that his part in that struggle was confined to the dis-
mal days and darkest hours of our great War for Liberty, and ended
before the new turn of affairs which the French intervention
afforded. His part, then, in it, belonged to losing days and ended
before the winnings days, before things began to give any sure
promise of success.
This, in turn, meant that he could not be present with the other
officers, when Washington bade them farewell and organized the
Cincinnati at Fraunces' Tavern in New York, for Putnam was sick
and helpless in Connecticut. This was, perhaps, why Colonel Hum-
phreys dedicated his "Biography" to the Connecticut Society of the
Cincinnati.
Putnam was pre-eminently a soldier of the people, for the people
a true, Democratic soldier. Therefore, the people loved him, and
his memory struck such fast and strong roots in popular appreciation
and recollection. In this he was like Andrew Jackson, Grant, Napo-
leon himself, in part, and the great Joffre, who felt for and with the
people and whom the people understood. These were no parlor sol-
diers. Putnam could not spell, but he could offer a pointed toast, one
filled with a deep political insight, with the wisdom of the true states-
man, as we have seen elsewhere in this paper. The British officers
who fought with him, respected and liked him.
Putnam was "ever attentive to the lives and happiness of his
men," as President Dwight put it, in his epitaph. He was a fully
grown American, representing the best in our hearts, sincere, simple,
unaffected, loyal, brave and true!
Even in praising Putnam, many writers seem to miss the point,
betray an inadequate acquaintance with and failure to see the full
[227!
significance and success of his career. For example, Washington
Irving says of him :
"A yeoman warrior fresh from the plow in the garb of rural
labor: (he begins, you see, with the historic ride after Lexington, and
seems not at all to have realized his previous service, this aspect of
his character seeming to have loomed so large in the eyes of some that
they fail utterly to see his previous training and exploits the largest
work of his life), a patriot, brave and generous, but rough and ready,
who thought not of himself in the time of danger, but was ready to
serve in any way, and to sacrifice rank and self-glorification to the
good of the cause. He was eminently a soldier for the occasion. His
name has long been a favorite one with young and old one of the
talismanic names of the Revolution, the very mention of which is like
the sound of a trumpet. Such names are the precious jewels of our
history, to be garnered up among the treasures of the Nation, and
kept immaculate from the tarnishing breath of the cynic and the
doubter."
General Putnam's epitaph, as written by President Dwight, of
Yale, and re-carved in granite for the base of the bronze statue in
Brooklyn, Connecticut, dedicated in June, 1888, follows:
To the Memory
of
Israel Putnam, Esquire,
Senior Major General in the Armies
of
The United States of America
who
was born at Salem
in the Province of Massachusetts
on the Seventh day of January
A. D. 1718
and died
on the twenty-ninth day of May
A. D. 1790.
[228]
WHOM SHOULD HISTORY RANK NEXT TO WASHINGTON
PASSENGER
If thou art a Soldier
Drop a tear over the dust of a Hero
who
Ever Attentive
To the lives and happiness of his Men
Dared to Lead
Where any Dared to Follow ;
IF A PATRIOT
REMEMBER the distinguished and gallant services
Rendered thy Country
By the Patriot who sleeps beneath this Monument ;
If thou art honest, generous & worthy
Render a cheerful tribute of respect
To a MAN
Whose generosity was singular
Whose honesty was proverbial
who
Raised himself to universal esteem
And offices of eminent distinction
By personal worth
and
Useful Life.
Charles Johnson, graduate of Yale, and English Professor at
Trinity, read a poem at the dedication of this equestrian statue,
erected in Putnam's honor, from which we quote these ringing words:
"He dared to lead
Where any dared to follow. In their need
Men looked to him.
A tower of strength was Israel Putnam's name
A rally word for Patriot acclaim :
It meant resolve, and hope, and bravery,
And steady cheerfulness and constancy,
[229!
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
And if, in jears to come, men should forget
That only freedom makes a nation great;
If men grow less as wealth accumulates,
Till gold becomes the life-blood of our States ;
Should all these heavy ills weigh down our hearts,
We'll turn to him, who acted well his part
In those old days, draw lessons from his fame
And hope and strength from Israel Putnam's name."
[230]
01
[23 1 1
THE WATERWAYS OF ILLINOIS
[232]
j&ttni (jfoorgr'a at jtopfyaro
jforrrunnec of 11 ttmrriran fona
BT
GRACE LOUISE ROBINSON
T WAS a long while ago, even before the landing of the
Pilgrims, that a simple wooden blockhouse on a jut-
ting bit of land, near the mouth of the Sagadehoc,
was built, the first fastness of the British in New
England. Saint George's it was called, and its place
was, most likely, on the little promontory called
Phipsburg, where the Popham Colonists spent their brief historic year.
Matter of tradition, for the most part, that old fort is now. Not
even its ruins are to be seen. The Atlantic winds and waves have
scattered every bit of wood and mortar, every nail and bullet. Yet it
is not all tradition, after all. For Strachey, the chronicler of the
Popham expedition,- tells of the building of a fort with trenches about
it, with twelve cannon mounted on its ramparts; and, in a strange
place to look for early New England documents, there is a map of the
old fortification. That place is in Simancos, Spain, where the Honor-
able J. L. Curry, when he was United States Ambassador to Spain,
discovered the old drawing. That shows it with towers, flankers,
bulwarks, an imposing fortification for that early time.
There, on the sands of Maine, it was built by the communist
expedition under Captain Popham and Captain Gilbert, at the begin-
ning of their ill-starred adventure in New World life. With the store-
house for trade with the Indians, the fifty log cabins, the other com-
munity buildings, it sprang, mushroom-fashion, into history, and
passed as quickly. First English-built fastness in New Eangland, it
rose before the eyes of the Pemaquid Indians, a marvel, a menace.
Tragic was the drama it played, when some of the colonists, more bull-
dozing, we are bound to believe, than the most of their number, turned
THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY
the cannon upon curious, visiting Indians who did not know the hor-
rors and cruelties of civilized warfare. Tragic for the men of the
Popham Colony, in its turn, was the aftermath of that sin of the
English; for the Fort of Saint George's could not protect its colony
unless there were, for the people of that colony, food, fuel, clothing,
the chance of trade with the Algonquins. Without that life could not
go on. But fish and game, skins and furs, corn and other foods the
outraged Indians would not bring to the Fort. In fear of revenge by
the natives, the colonists did not dare hunt, fish, or go into the forests
to cut wood. They had killed the goose that laid the golden egg.
Civilization, having played false with the natives, must hurry back
to Europe and wait for another time to make itself strong in New
England. That the Pilgrims, coming in a different spirit, thirteen
years later, were to do.
So the men of Saint George's, who might have made a bigger,
better history for Maine at that time, left their village, their cabins
and yards, the place where their burned storehouse had stood, and
traveled back across the Atlantic. Maybe they took, maybe they left,
the first little ship built in New England, The Virginia. By the shore
they left the grave of George Popham, their President, who said :
"I die content. My name will always be associated with the first
planting of the English race in the New World. My remains will not
be neglected, away from the home of my fathers and my kindred."
But the gallant and courteous gentleman, who was worthy of a
better company than were many of those who sailed with him and
Raleigh Gilbert, was no prophet. His grave was neglected. For only
the fort was left, with the dismantled semblance of a village, to give
the look of England to that coast region.
Without a colony to protect, Saint George's was no longer a fort.
Yet it has a right to a place in the mind of New Englanders and of
all other Americans, for it was the first of its kind, and, whatever the
faults and mistakes, spelling ruin to the colony, of the men who should
have been settlers, their leaders were noble men and the adventure of
the building of Saint George's was a passionate page in the life of the
seventeenth century.
Thinking of that, the men of the twentieth century, three hundred
years away from the romance, danger, bravery, mistakes of that for-
[234]
SAINT GEORGE AT POPHAM
lorn undertaking, held, on the Popham site, in 1907, a Tercentennary.
There they unveiled a tablet which reads thus:
THE FIRST ENGLISH COLONY
ON THE SHORES OF NEW ENGLAND
WAS FOUNDED HERE
AUGUST 29 N. S. 1607
UNDER
GEORGE POPHAM
That is the best memorial of the old Fort of Saint George's,
Forerunner of All American Forts.
[235]
UNITED STATES WARSHIP FIRING A SALUTE
In October, 1912, when the United States Navy waa anchored off New York City in the Huduon Rlrer.
[236]
^.-*^^
^^JO 1 ^ ^X '^^aL-
* * ^' im *
. .
^^^^/^.^^ -
^?^^^^^ ^f^U^t-*-
<J^ ~S*~- X %*.^W?
<r/4' ^ # jL-'&r**-^ ;
l-'ACSIMIl K 'F THE ARTICLES OF CAPITULATION SIONKP HY CKNKKAL BUROOYNE OP
THK HKIT1SH A K M Y . AKTKK T H K It.XTTI.K OF SARATOGA. IN 1777
[2371
w. v*^^^^*^*^^^^***^
^/K ." *~i*w x 4^-X^f^> -^ ^Q*^- >tl^ ^L ^_^.
&^i^6zfcr>>$&
>***^&*S!3&&
' ' N - . V^J<,&V*%'
"^^' ^ ^
SECOND PAGE OF
.*L BUBOO,
[240]
A Hi&ory of the Origin and De-
velopment of Banks and Banking
and of Banks and Banking in the
City of New York :-: :-: :-:
BY
W. Harrison Bayles
and
Frank Allaben
FRANK ALLABEN, Editor-in-Chief
[241]
CHAPTER III
of BanKinu in
Practically No Banking Houses in Existence Before the Time of
Charles I The Jews Control the Banking in England English Kings
Extort Huge Sums of Money from the Jews Jews Robbed and Ban-
ished from England England Begins to Borrow from Italian Bank-
ers The City of Boston is Forced to Loan to the English
Sovereign Extravagance of English Monarchs Forces Them to Sell
Crown Jewels to Gain Credit The English Silver Penny the New
Medium of Exchange Henry III Issues Gold Coinage The Royal
Exchange is Established The Royal Exchange Passes Out of Exist-
ence Corfy Buys the Right of Entire English Exchange-Control
from the King Royal Exchange is Again Revived The Goldsmiths
Become the Bankers of England The Famous "Temple Bar" Bank
is Founded Blackwell and Other Bankers Make Heavy Loans to
Charles II The Exchequer is Closed and Edward Blackwell is Ruined
All Other Bankers Who Have Loaned to the King Fail Banking
Conditions in England Sink Into a Very Uncertain State Only One
Financial House Survives the Crash.
Ill
of lanktttg in
EFORE the reign of Charles I. there do not appear to
have been in England any business houses devoted
entirely or principally to banking or exchange. The
little of this sort of business done in London was
transacted by the merchants. The Italian merchants
of Lombard street, who in the Thirteenth and Four-
teenth Centuries bought up the wool of England for the cloth manu-
facturers of Florence, were ready to negotiate bills of exchange,
through their correspondents, on almost any city of Europe, and were
also willing to loan money on good security and at high rates of inter-
est. Earlier than this, as on the continent, the loaning of money was
almost entirely in the hands of Jews, and seizure and confiscation of
the property of people of this nationality seem to have contributed to
a considerable extent to the income of the crown.
The Jews came in from Normandy with the Norman Conquest,
and from that time were used by the Kings of England as a source
of revenue in any sudden need. They were settled by themselves in
separate quarters, or "J ew ri es >" were protected from the popular
hatred in the free exercise of their religion, and were allowed to erect
synagogues and to direct their ecclesiastical affairs by means of
Rabbis. A royal justiciary was set up to secure law to the Jewish
merchant, who had no standing in the courts. The Jew had no right
of citizenship; he was simply the King's chattel, and his life and goods
were absolutely at the King's mercy; but he was a source of revenue
and was used without stint. A large portion of the wealth, which his
industry and enterprise accumulated, was demanded by the King
when in need, and torture and imprisonment were resorted to in case
milder means did not succeed.
King Henry III. squeezed the Jews most unmercifully. One Jew
alone, called Aaron of York, was on various occasions obliged to pay
large sums of money, until the total amo