Skip to main content

Full text of "A Note on Guinizelli's "Al cor Gentil""

See other formats


Early Journal Content on JSTOR, Free to Anyone in the World 

This article is one of nearly 500,000 scholarly works digitized and made freely available to everyone in 
the world byJSTOR. 

Known as the Early Journal Content, this set of works include research articles, news, letters, and other 
writings published in more than 200 of the oldest leading academic journals. The works date from the 
mid-seventeenth to the early twentieth centuries. 

We encourage people to read and share the Early Journal Content openly and to tell others that this 
resource exists. People may post this content online or redistribute in any way for non-commercial 

Read more about Early Journal Content at 
journal-content . 

JSTOR is a digital library of academic journals, books, and primary source objects. JSTOR helps people 
discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content through a powerful research and teaching 
platform, and preserves this content for future generations. JSTOR is part of ITHAKA, a not-for-profit 
organization that also includes Ithaka S+R and Portico. For more information about JSTOR, please 

Modern Philology 

Volume XII December IOI4 Number 6 


The first stanza of Guinizelli's canzone Al cor gentil is printed as 
follows in the critical edition of Casini: 

Al cor gentil ripara sempre amore 

com' a la selva augello in la verdura 

n6 fe' amore avanti gentil core, 

nh gentil core avanti amor natura, 

ch' adesso che fo' il sole 

si tosto lo splendore fo' lucente 

nk fo' avanti il sole; 

6 prende amore in gentilezza loco 

cosi propiamente 

como clarore in clarity di foco.' 

The readings of the three primary MSS for the last part of line 7 
are as follows: Vat. 3793, davanti sole; Laur. Red. 9, avantel sole; 
Pal. 418, davantil sole? 

Two interpretations are current for line 7. Some critics, regard- 
ing avanti as an adverb and sole as the subject, take the line to mean: 

Nor did the sun exist before.' 

' Le rime dei poeti bolognesi del aecolo XIII, ed. T. Caslnl (, = Scelta di curiosM lett. 
ined, o rare. No. 185) (Bologna, 1881), p. 15. 

2 Ed. cit., p. 249. 

' A. D'Aucona and D. Comparetti, Le antiche rime volgari, II (Bologna, 1881), 30, 31 ; 
G. Federzoni, La canzone di Guido Guinizetti '*Al cor gentil ripara sempre amore" (Bologna, 
1905), p. 6. 

325] 65 [MoDEEN Philology, December, 1914 

66 Ernest H. Wilkins 

Others, regarding avanti il sole as a prepositional phrase, take the 
line to mean: 

Nor did it [i.e., the light] exist before the sun.' 

Neither of these interpretations is quite satisfactory. The first 
offers a clear and straightforward thought-process, thus: love was 
not before the gentle heart, nor the gentle heart before love; the 
light was not before the sun, nor the sun before light. The trouble 
is that avanti il sole looks exactly like a prepositional phrase, and not 
at all like an independent adverb juxtaposed to a nominative article 
and noun. If the second interpretation be followed, on the other 
hand, line 7 seems merely a slight and needless variation of the idea 
of lines 5 and 6. 

But Casini's reading avanti il sole is in itself unsatisfactory; for 
the rhyme it involves, il sole: il sole, is, as I shall show, extremely 

Equivocal rhyme consists, by common definition, in the rhyming 
of two words identical in form but different in meaning.' The 
requirement that the rhyme-words differ in meaning is, however, 
more or less relaxed, as will presently appear, in a number of instances 
in early Italian poetry. Equivocal rhyme may be used sporadically, 
that is, once or twice or somewhat oftener, in a poem in which the 
remaining rhymes are not equivocal; or it may be used consistently, 
with deliberate artistic purpose, throughout a poem, or in several 
lines of each stanza. 

The use of equivocal rhyme in the Sicilian and Tuscan canzoni 
of the thirteenth century has been studied by Biadene.^ He Usts 
about one hundred and fifty cases of sporadic equivocal rhyme. 
In nearly all of these cases the rhyme-words differ in meaning. 
There are, however, 23 cases in which Biadene finds no difference in 

' D. G. Rossettl, Italian Poets Chiefly before Dante (Stratford-on-Avon, 1908), 
p. 42; A. Bongioanni, Guido Quinizelli e la sua riforma poetica (Venice, 1896), p. 42. 

2 The accuracy of Casini's reading of line 7 was questioned, but not studied, by 
A. J. Butler, The Forerunners of Dante (Oxford, 1910), p. 250: "No variant to this line 
appears to exist, yet it is hardly possible to accept it exactly as it stands, as sole appears 
to be used in an identical sense with that of 1. 5." 

« The first Italian definition, that of Antonio da Tempo (written in 1322) , is as 
follows: "Et dicendum, quod equivocus est dictio vel dictiones compositae cum eadem 
voce et sonoritate et ex eisdem Uteris, habentes plura et diversa slgniflcata" (Delle rime 
volgari, ed. G. Grion (Bologna, 18691, P- 160). 

* L. Biadene, "La rima nella canzone Italiana del secoli XIII e XIV," in Raccolta di 
studii dedicati ad Alessandro D' Ancona (Florence, 1901), pp. 730 fl. 


A Note on Guinizelli's "Al cor gentil" 67 

meaning, though he remarks that in some of them another critic 
might find a difference.^ In many of these cases the reading is uncer- 
tain. In 16 of the 23 cases the lines in question are transmitted in 
one MS only.^ In several cases plausible corrections have been or 
might be proposed.' In no case does a noun preceded by the definite 
article rhyme with the same noun preceded by the definite article.* 

• Biadene lists 25 cases, but two of these are to be disregarded. 37 (In this and 
the following notes italicized numerals refer to poems according to their order in MS 
Vat. 3793; quotations are, unless otherwise indicated, from II libra de varie romame 
volgare, ed. F. Egidi [Rome, 1908); and the line divisions and line numbers are, unless 
otherwise indicated, those of Le antiche rime volgari, ed. D'Ancona and Comparetti 
IBologna, 1875-88]), lines 3 and 9, is not a case in point. Each of the lines ends with the 
word data, but they fall in independent rhyme-groups, the rhyme -ato being used twice in 
this stanza, once in the piedi, and once in the voUa, though the corresponding rhyme is 
not repeated in the other stanzas. For 160, lines 31 and 32, Biadene quotes the rhyme 
matto: matto from the 1828 edition of Guittone, but in the modem critical edition (Fra 
Gulttone d'Arezzo, Le rime, ed. F. Pellegrini (Bologna, 1901], I, 348) the rhyme is 
ynlatto: matto. 

•The instances occur in SI, SS, 63, 70, BS9, 230, iS31, 232, HI, 279, 280, 29B; cf. G. B. 
Festa, "Bibiiografla delle pia antiche rime volgari itaUane," in Romaniache Forschungen, 
XXV (1908), 564. 

' E.g., for 31, line 33, durare, Grion reads dare ("II serventese di Ciullo d' Alcamo," 
in II propugnatore, IV [1871], Part I, 148). For 63, line 70, mascondo, one might read 
nascondo. See also the next note. 

* There is, however, one case in which an infinitive preceded by al rhymes with the 
same infinitive preceded by al, in 279 (Monte. Nelcore agio unfoco), lines 63 and 65: sono 
alperire / comomo chesichuro / tio mare ede alperire. This poem is transmitted in Vat. 
3793 only. 

The cases in which the equivocal rhyme- words are nouns are as follows : 38, 1 and 3 : 
Aamore jnchui disio edosperanza / . . . . / eguardomi infino cheuengna lasperanza. Oape- 
ranza is a verbal phrase equivalent to spero. Some editors have fidama, a conjectural 
emendation, for the first speranza. 63, 53 and 54 (I quote 52-55) : Rico sono delasperanza 
/ pouero difina manza / sanami lafina amanza / quddo laposso uedere. In 53 amanza is 
abstract, in 54 it means "the beloved lady." Transmitted in Vat. 3793 only. 138, 46 
and 49: Pegio cheguerra assai reo se piucomo / . . . . / pche nompo tralglianimali eomo. 
The first omo perhaps means "anyone"; the second, "man as distinct from the brutes." 
ISO, 61 and 64 (I quote 61-65 from Guittone, ed. Pellegrini, pp. 319-20) : Foil' d chi fugge 
il 8U0 prode e cher danno / e V onor suo fa che vergogna i torna: / di bona libertA, ou* e' 
soggiorna / a gran piacer, s' aduce, a suo gran danno, / Sotto [de] segnoria fella e mahagia. 
The danno of the 61 is general, and is the antonym of prode; the danno of 64 is specific, 
and is the antonym of piacer. IBS, 2 and 5 (I quote 1-5 from Guittone, ed. cit., p. 254) : 
Manta stagione veggio / Che V omo e, sanza colpa, / miso a dispregio grande, / E tal che 
colpa pande/ ne va si com no 'n colpa. MS Riccardiano 2533 reads for line 5, ne va sicomo 
not colpa (ed. cit., loc. cit.). In this reading, which makes better sense than the accepted 
reading if sicomo be divided si c' omo, the colpa appears as a verb. In the accepted read- 
ing sanza colpa and 'n colpa are presumably to be regarded as phrasal units. 16S, 47 
and 48 (I quote 46-48 from Monaci, Crestomazia italiana dei primi secoli [Citta di Castello, 
1889], p. 181) : quale danno leria / se fere tucte, onne dimonio, omni homo / fosse soma d' 
un omo t Omni homo is perhaps regarded as a plu-asal unit. The homo means "man as 
distinct from the brutes"; the omo, "a given individual." 241, 32 and 38: madonna 
mante uolte / . . . . / ma dipiu rade uolte. Mante uolte is presumably regarded as a phrasal 
unit. Transmitted in Vat. 3793 only. 280, 58 and 60: Dapoi chamore mapreso / comsi 
fortte chatena / chio mora sedifeso / nomsono ditale chatena. Vat. 3793 only. 295, 12 and 
16: chemi comsuma amortte sostenendo vita I .... / piu chenaue jntempesta la mia vita. 
Vat. 3793 only. 


68 Ernest H. Wilkins 

Biadene lists 20 canzoni as consistently equivocal. In these 
canzoni the constant equivocation becomes a tour de force, and in the 
special exigency the requirement of difference in meaning is more 
readily relaxed. In the great majority of cases the meaning still 
differs, but there are a number of instances in which the difference 
is very small or quite imperceptible.^ Among these instances, how- 
ever, there is but one case of a noun preceded by the definite article 
rhyming with the same noun preceded by the definite article. The 
poem in question is by an insignificant author, Finfo del Buono 
Guido Neri di Firenze, is transmitted in Vat. 3793 only, and is quite 

The sonnet of the same period, being regarded as less noble than 
the canzone, admitted in general a somewhat greater metrical license; 
but it does not differ notably from the canzone in the matter of 
equivocal rhyme.' 

Guinizelli's rhyme sole: sole in the lines under discussion is an 

' Of. E. G. Parodi, "La rima e i vocaboli In rima nella Divina Commedia," in BulUt- 
tino delta Societd dantesca italiana, N.S., III (1895-96), 141-42. 

^ 19S (5e longhuso mimena), 38 a_nd 41 (I quote 37-41): Rengnatinsimal manto / 
chebene fato nel monte / che fue gia soma questa / ondaltre dio malmanto / sonore nonai 
nelmonte. There is one other case in which a noun preceded by the definite article rhymes 
with the same noun preceded by the definite article, but in tills case the meaning of the 
noun varies clearly in the two instances: £89, 106 and 107 (I quote 106-8^: chesi crudele 
adosso o logiudicio / checredo chediqui aldie del giodicio / limiei tormenti nonaueranno fine. 
The giudicio means "suffering"; the giodicio, "the Last Judgment." 

» The use of sporadic equivocal rhyme in the sonnet of the thirteenth century has 
not been studied. Biadene ("Morfologia del sonetto nel sec. XIII e XIV," in Stud} di 
filologia romama, IV [1889], 155-56), mentions 50 consistently equivocal sonnets. (He 
lists 51 sonnets, but 766, which he includes, is not equivocal.) I have examined 42 of 
these sonnets (8 are inaccessible to me: that by Talano, the last 5 mentioned by Biadene 
»mder a, and the last 2 mentioned under ^), and find the rhyme usage much like that in 
the consistently equivocal camoni. There are three cases in which a noun preceded by 
the definite article rhymes with the same noun preceded by the definite article. In all 
three cases the article is preceded, in one or both of the two lines, by a preposition that 
unites with it, forming a distinctive case sign. The cases are as follows. 791,1 and 3 : 
alamore: lamore. Vat. 3793 only. 914, 3 and 5: la fera; da la fera. Vat. 3793 only. 
Bonaglunta da Lucca, Chi va cherendo guerra, e lassa pace (Poeti del primo secolo [ed. 
Valeriani] [Florence, 1816], I, 522), 10 and 13: al core: nel core. Not in any MS. First 
printed in La bella mano (fifteenth century) . A fourth case, but a very doubtful one, 
appears in the sonnet of Dello da Signa, Ser Chiaro, lo tuo dir d' ira non sale, 10 and 13. 
These lines appear thus in MS Vat. 3214: e bell e in ballo e ne lo gioco lasso /..../ ma 
ueni uano e tosto riman lasso (Rime antiche italiane secondo la lezione del cod. vat. 3214, 
ed. M.Pelaez [Bologna, 1895], p. 138). Valeriani prints e nello gioco V asso and e torto 
riman V asso (Poeti del primo secolo, II, 158), but it seems more probable that the second 
lasso is the adjective. Another case appears in a consistently equivocal sonnet men- 
tioned by Parodi (loc. cit.) but not by Biadene — 88i, 2, 4, and 5: al camppo: del camppo: 
il camppo. Here, too, the article, in two of the three lines, is preceded by a preposition 
that unites with it, forming a distinctive case sign. In Vat. 3793 only. 


A Note on Guinizelli's "Al cor gentil" 69 

instance of sporadic equivocal rhyme. There is no other case of 
equivocal rhyme in Al cor gentil. Six cases of sporadic equivocal 
rhyme occur in the other poems assigned by Casini to Guinizelli.* 
In each of these cases the rhyme-words in question differ in meaning.^ 
In no case does a noun rhyme with itself. 

In one poem of Guinizelli, Canzone II, Lo fin pregio avanzato,^ 
equivocal rhyme is used consistently. The poem is unintelligible. 
In no case does a noun preceded by the definite article rhyme with 
the same noun preceded by the definite article. 

It would seem improbable, therefore, that Guinizelli allowed him- 
self in the lines under discussion the rhyme il sole: il sole. The idea 
of differentiation persists throughout the use of equivocal rhyme. 
Even when the rhyme-words themselves do not differ in meaning 
there is at least a phrasal differentiation of some sort. But the 
definite article, when repeated with the same noun, by its very 
definiteness, makes against differentiation; and rhyme of the type 
il sole: il sole is therefore obviously contrary to the essential nature 
of equivocal rhyme. It is in particular highly improbable that 
Guinizelli allowed himself such a rhyme in this stanza — the opening 
stanza of a poem which, as the manifesto of a new poetic doctrine 
and method, must have been written with the utmost care. 

1 believe, accordingly, that the reading of Vat. 3793, davanti 
sole, is correct in its omission of the article. Line 7 would then read 
(accepting Casini's text for the first three words) : 

nh fo' avanti sole. 

The insertion of the article in the other MSS may well have been the 
result of a scribal attempt at rectification. 

The line is to be interpreted, I believe, thus: 
Nor was there [any] sun before. 

> Camoni I, lines 46 and 47; 49 and 52; IV. 21 and 22; Sonnets XV, 4 and 7; XX 
3 and 5; 4 and 8 (ed. cit., pp. 5-42). This list does not Include the two or three cases In 
which two rhyme- words identical In form occur In the same stanza but In unrelated rhyme- 
groups, In poems In which a rhyme of the piedi Is, In one stanza but not in all stanzas, 
repeated in the voUa: e.g., Camone III, 1 and 9. 

2 The difference is slight in the first two cases. In I, 46, di molto orgoglio a dire, 
the a dire is a single verbal phrase of gerundive value; in 47, che s' eo voglio ver dire, the 
ver dire is a single phrase meaning "to be truthful." In 49, A pinger V air son data, the 
dato means "engaged"; in 56, lasso, ch' eo li fui dato, the dato means "given." More- 
over, son dato and fui dato were presumably regarded as unities. 

> Ed. cit., p. 8. 


70 Ernest H. Wilkins 

"With this reading and interpretation, the sole of line 7 differs 
from that of line 5 by its indefiniteness, the general concept "sun," 
"any sun," "luminary," standing against the particular concept 
"the sun." The difference is slight, to be sure, but it is just the sort 
of minor difference that appears in several of the instances of equivo- 
cal rhyme noted by Biadene. This interpretation is similar to the 
first of the two interpretations, cited above, of the line as printed 
by Casini. It offers the same clear thought-process as that inter- 
pretation, and is free from its defect, for avanti sole does not, like 
avanti il sole, give the impression of being a prepositional phrase 
rather than an adverb and noun juxtaposed.' 

I owe thanks to Professors Pietsch and Shaw and to Dr. Pietro 
Stoppani for valuable suggestions with regard to this article. 

Ernest H. Wilkins 
University of Chicago 

• Another possible interpretation seems worth mention. The sole of line 7 may be 
taken as an adverb, and the line interpreted thus: " Nor did it [i.e., the light) exist before, 
separately." Only one instance ol sole as an adverb has been lexically registered, the 
following passage from the translation of Ovid's Metamorphoses by Ser Arrigo Simin- 
tendi da Prato (fourteenth century): E non basta sole ck' egli sia Giove: dia pegno d' 
amore s' egli sia Giove (V. Nannucci, Teorica dei nomi della lingua italiana [Florence, 1858], 
p. 163; P. Petrdcchi, Ndvo diziondrio universale della lingua italiana, s.v. "sole** [II, 980 
inf.]). Sole is perhaps used in this way in Guinizelli's unintelligible equivocal canzone, 
Lo fin pregio avamaio, line 41, Lines 40-47 are as follows; D' un' amorosa parte / me ven 
voler che sole / che in ver me piii sole / che non fa la pantera, / eke usa in una parte / eke 
levantisce sole / eke di piit color sole / so viso che pantera (ed. cit., p. 9). The eke sole seems 
to represent ck' e sole. The existence of sole as an adverb is a priori probable. Solo 
appears very frequently in the apocopated form sol: and the completion of that form by 
a paragogic e would be entirely natural.