Skip to main content

Full text of "Letter to the Right. Hon. and Rev. the Lord Bishop of London : on the state of the Anglican Congregations in Germany"

See other formats


,* 


7 

LETTER 


TO  THE  RIGHT  HON.  AND  REV.  THE 


LORD  BISHOP  OF  LONDON, 


ON  THE  STATE  OF  THE 


ANGLICAN  CONGREGATIONS 


IN  GERMANY. 


BY    THE 

REV.  JOHN  HAMILTON  GRAY,  M.A. 

OF  MAGDALEN  COLLEGE,  OXFORD, 
VICAR    OF    nOLSOVER    AND    SCARCL1FF. 


LONDON: 
PRINTED  FOR  J.  G.  F.  &  J.  RIVINGTON, 

ST.   PAUL'S   CHURCH    YARD, 
AND   WATERLOO    PLACE,   PALL    MALL. 

1S43. 


LONDON  : 

GILBERT  AND  RIVINGTON,  PRINTERS, 
ST.  JOHN'S  SQUARE. 


A  LETTER, 


MY  LORD, 

THE  peculiar  opportunities  which  I  have  long  en- 
joyed of  acquaintance  with  very  influential  Germans, 
and  the  fact  that  I  have  recently  been  eye  witness  of 
the  evils  to  which  it  is  the  object  of  this  Letter  to 
suggest  a  remedy,  will,  I  trust,  in  some  measure 
justify  me  in  venturing  to  address  your  Lordship. — 
Indeed,  the  subject  of  the  following  remarks  is  of 
more  especial  interest  at  a  time  like  the  present, 
when  there  is  among  us  an  increasing  desire  for  in- 
tercourse with  other  branches  of  the  Christian 
Church,  and  when  pious  and  earnest  minds  seem 
influenced  by  a  feeling  of  necessity  to  seek  for  an 
extension  of  Catholic  communion.  And  this  interest 
is  heightened,  since  the  prospect  of  a  nearer  con- 
nexion between  us  and  the  principal  division  of 
German  Protestantism,  the  United  Lutheran  and 
Reformed  Establishment  of  Prussia,  has  of  late 

A  2 


gladdened  the  hearts  of  some,  while  it  has  afforded 
matter  of  exciting  speculation  to  many. 

However  little  immediate  prospect  there  may  be  of 
any  such  consummation,  which  is  deprecated  equally 
by  the  extremes  of  party  in  England  and  in  Prussia, 
the  fact  that  such  a  connexion  has  been  contemplated, 
and  is  regarded  as  possible  and  desirable  by  some 
influential  persons  in  both  countries,  has  made  our 
church  an  object  of  intense  interest  in  the  eyes  of 
German  Protestants.     The  feeling,  it  is  true,  with 
which  they  regard  us  is  that  of  jealousy.     They  will 
not  admit  that  they  are  in  want  of  any  thing  which 
we  can  give  them.     And  they  are  extremely  sus- 
picious, lest,  contrary  to  their  wishes,  an  apostolical 
gift  should  be  imparted  to  them ;  a  gift,  from  which 
their  inability  to  appreciate  it,  proves  that  in  their 
present  state  of  mind,  at  least,  they  could  derive  no 
benefit.     It  is  indeed  to  be  hoped  that  this  very 
opposition  to  Anglican  Catholicity,  which  has  been 
so  strongly  brought  out  within  the   last  eighteen 
months  by  the  proposed  partial  connexion  in  the 
Levant   between  the  Church  of  England  and  the 
Lutherans,  may  be  the  dawn  of  better  things  for  the 
Church   of   Prussia.      Because,   where    there   is  a 
strong   opposition   to  any   measure,  the  subject   is 
debated,  the  conflicting  arguments  are  weighed,  and 
from  the  collision  of  opinion  the  truth  in  the  end 
remains  victorious. 

Thus,  had  the  Protestants  of  Germany  continued 
to  regard  the  Anglican  Church  as  a  distant  object,  with 


which  there  was  no  prospect  of  collision  either  for  good 
or  for  evil,  their  long  engendered  habit  of  apathy  and 
indifference  to  much  that  we  consider  Catholic  and 
Apostolic,  might  yet  have  endured  for  years  to  come. 
They  might  still  have  considered  our  Church  in  the 
light  of  a  mighty  state  establishment,  a  powerful  po- 
litical engine,  a  convenient  provision  for  the  sons  and 
favourites  of  great  families,  a  wealthy  harvest  field, 
where  a  golden  crop  was  to  be  reaped,  not  of  souls  to 
the  Lord  of  the  Harvest,  but  of  guineas  to  the  purse 
of  a  Right  Reverend  political  jobber,  or  Reverend 
foxhunter.  There  can  be  little  doubt  that  such  was 
the  very  prejudiced  idea  entertained  of  us  in  general 
by  the  majority  of  the  German  clergy.  The  more 
learned  of  them  could  not  indeed  but  know  that 
giants  had  existed  in  every  age  of  the  English 
Church.  But  the  intercourse  which  had  been 
maintained  in  modern  times  between  them  and 
England  was  with  Protestant  Dissenters,  with  whom 
lay  their  sympathies,  and  from  whom  they  derived 
their  idea  of  our  position. 

But  now  this  rich,  luxurious,  and  secular  Church  is 
brought  before  them  in  a  new  light,  as  the  earnest 
and  anxious  assertor  of  orthodox  truth,  the  refuter 
of  error,  whether  Romish,  Puritanical,  or  Rational- 
istic, and  the  zealous  extender  of  Catholic  apos- 
tolicity.  In  this  character  is  the  Church  of  England 
of  the  present  day,  forced,  as  it  were,  upon  the 
notice  of  Germany.  Yet  this  character,  though 
asserted  with  an  appeal  to  truth  which  must  stagger 


G 


a  gainsay er,  is,  nevertheless,  vehemently  disputed. 
And  we  may  with  confidence  expect  that  the  at- 
tempt to  refute  the  truth  will,  in  God's  own  good 
time,  have  the  effect  more  fully  to  elicit  it. 

Thus  I  venture  to  predict,  that,  however  unpro- 
mising the  appearance  of  a  Catholic  reaction  in 
Germany  may  be,  the  day  is  not  far  distant  when 
this  great  movement  will  spring  forth  from  the  only 
real  and  enduring  source,  an  inward  consciousness  of 
necessity,  a  feeling  of  want,  which  will  then  cause 
that  to  be  craved  as  a  boon,  which  would  now  be 
rejected  as  an  insult.  It  is  not  the  arm  of  a  King, 
however  pious  and  powerful,  nor  yet  the  consecra- 
tion of  a  Bishop,  however  apostolic  and  venerable, 
that  will  bring  this  to  pass.  It  is  the  arm  of  the  King 
of  kings,  it  is  the  working  of  the  Spirit  imparted  to 
his  Church  by  the  Bishop  of  souls,  which  will  thus 
change  the  hearts  and  sway  the  minds  of  the  Ger- 
man people.  And  this  most  blessed  consummation 
will  probably  arrive  more  quickly  than,  judging  from 
mere  human  probabilities,  we  have  reason  to  hope. 
It  might  be  difficult  to  point  out  the  quarter  from 
whence  a  general  Catholic  reaction  in  Prussia  was 
likely  to  come.  But  that  it  will  come,  we  may  rest 
assured ;  and  that  too,  mainly  through  the  agency  of 
the  Anglican  Church.  Not  indeed  by  immediately 
sending  forth  a  Hierarchy  to  supply  that  which  to 
our  eye  is  manifestly  wanting,  or  to  complete  that 
which  is  glaringly  defective.  But  by  demonstrating 
by  words  of  argument  and  power,  and  deeds  of  holi- 


ness  and  Jove,  the  rightful  authority  of  our  system  ; 
by  leading  the  Germans  to  turn  their  minds  to  these 
unaccustomed  subjects ;  by  placing  before  them 
the  example  of  Catholic  truth,  and  Apostolic  zeal, 
and  by  holding  out  to  them  the  arms  of  brotherly 
affection1. 

While  the  Church  of  England  is  thus  regarded 
with  intense  interest  by  Protestants,  she  is  no  less 
narrowly  watched  by  Roman  Catholics,  who,  indeed, 
profess  to  hail  her  as  rapidly  approximating  to  a 
union  with  Rome;  though  they  really  behold  with 
dread  that  spirit  which  reminds  her  of  her  glorious 
privileges,  and  impels  her  to  act  according  to  a  right 
view  of  her  peculiar  position.  In  the  many  oppor- 

1  We  have,  perhaps,  little  idea  of  the  jealous  irritability  with 
which  our  expressions  are  sometimes  misconstrued  by  the  Ger- 
mans. For  instance,  the  sentence  which  appeared  in  the  admir- 
able document  published  by  authority,  on  the  subject  of  the 
Jerusalem  Bishopric,  in  which  it  is  said ;  "  We  may  reasonably 
hope  that  it  may  lead  the  way  to  an  essential  unity  of  discipline, 
as  well  as  of  doctrine,  between  our  own  Church  and  the  less 
perfectly  constituted  Churches  of  Europe,"  has  excited  the 
strongest  feelings  of  opposition.  These  words  have  been  sup- 
posed to  convey  much  more  than  was  really  intended,  and  to 
express  a  censure  on  the  doctrines,  as  well  as  the  discipline  of  the 
Church  of  Prussia.  This  misapprehension  has  been  in  some 
measure  removed  by  the  recent  ordinance  of  the  Archbishop  of 
Canterbury,  which  has  been  made  public  in  Prussia,  authorizing 
the  Anglican  Bishop  in  Jerusalem  to  ordain  any  approved  Ger- 
man candidate  for  orders,  who  has  subscribed  the  Augsburg  Con- 
fession and  the  three  Creeds,  and  to  admit  him  to  minister,  under 
his  jurisdiction,  to  a  German  congregation. 


8 


tunities  which  I  have  had  of  late  years,  of  mixing  in 
the  soqiety  of  very  distinguished  members,  both  lay 
and  clerical,  of  the  Church  of  Rome,  I  have  been 
greatly  struck  by  their  altered  tone  towards  the 
Church  of  England.  They  seem  scarcely  so  much  to 
expect  or  to  desire  the  conversion  of  individuals,  as 
the  accomplishment  of  a  union  with  her  as  a  body. 
They  diminish  as  much  as  possible  the  immense 
differences  which  distinguish  us  from  themselves, 
glossing  over  the  points  which  are  at  issue  between 
us,  and  professing  to  cherish  the  hope  of  a  better 
understanding.  When  hard  pressed,  however,  the 
truth  will  out.  It  is  to  be  a  union  all  on  their  own 
terms.  Whatever  appearances  there  may  be  of 
sympathy  at  the  present  time,  between  a  portion  of 
our  clergy  and  the  Romish  Church,  are  exaggerated, 
and  caught  at  as  realities.  The  number  of  those 
said  to  be  so  predisposed  in  favour  of  Rome  is  increased 
an  hundredfold.  All  those  who  stand  up  for  the 
integrity  of  the  Church  of  England  against  Protes- 
tant schism,  are  enlisted  among  the  favourers  of 
Romanism.  While  inferences  most  untrue  are  drawn 
from  gross  misstatements,  and  conclusions  from  con- 
tradictory premises. 

As  an  instance  how  things  the  most  adverse  are 
often  misconstrued  by  Romanists  according  to  their 
wishes,  I  may  mention  to  your  Lordship  a  circum- 
stance, though  in  itself  trivial,  which  happened  very 
lately  within  my  own  observation.  An  Archbishop 
and  Patriarch  of  the  Church  of  Rome,  with  whom  I 


then  had  the  honour  of  daily  intercourse,  mentioned 
to  me  with  uncommon  satisfaction,  the  important 
and  valuable  aid  which  was  expected  from  the  Bishop 
of  Oxford  in  bringing  about  the  reunion  of  the 
Church  of  England  with  that  of  Rome;  and  he 
pointed  out  as  the  ground  of  this  expectation,  certain 
extracts  from  his  lordship's  late  charge  in  the  news- 
paper called  the  "Univers,"  and  which  had  been 
artfully  put  together  so  as  to  present  a  somewhat 
startling  appearance.  Fortunately,  I  was  able  to 
give  to  the  Patriarch  a  copy  of  the  charge  itself;  and 
the  perusal  of  it  filled  him  with  dismay.  For  he 
declared  that  he  had  never  read  so  decided,  and,  as 
he  thought,  violently  unjust  an  attack  upon  his 
Church.  And  though  himself  the  most  amiable  and 
benignant  of  men,  he  immediately  sent  me  a  letter 
couched  in  extremely  strong  terms,  with  a  view  to 
vindicate  his  Church  from  the  Bishop's  censures. 

It  is  not  too  much  to  say,  that  the  Church  of  Eng- 
land is  at  this  moment  placed,  as  it  were,  upon  a 
pedestal,  as  an  object  of  prominent  observation,  and 
is  regarded  with  interest,  curiosity,  and  respect,  by 
the  whole  Christian  world ;  by  some,  with  affection 
and  hope,  while,  by  others,  with  dislike  and  dread. 
But  the  affection  and  hope  are  increasing,  the  more 
the  pious  and  earnest-minded  portion  of  Protestants 
consider  her  claims  and  observe  her  practical  work- 
ing; and  the  more  the  Christianly  liberal  portion  of 
Romanists  compare  her  doctrines  and  discipline  with 


10 


what  their  own  true  tradition  informs  them  was  the 
faith  of  their  forefathers  in  early  days.  The  dislike 
and  dread  may,  on  the  other  hand,  be  said  also  to  be 
on  the  increase;  for  the  more  clearly  truth  is  set 
before  the  hardened  in  error,  the  more  intense  will 
their  opposition  become :  and  while  many  are  gained 
over  by  its  influence,  some  will  be  led  away  to  still 
more  violent  extremes. 

A  reflecting  mind  that  is  acquainted  with  the  claims 
of  the  Anglican  Church,  and  is  persuaded  of  her  zeal 
to  vindicate  them  for  the  glory  of  God,  and  that  has,  at 
the  same  time,  had  opportunity  to  observe  the  actual 
condition  both  of  Popery  and  Protestantism  in  Ger- 
many, must  feel  that  she  has  indeed  a  mission  of 
immense  importance  to  fulfil  in  that  country.  A 
mission  which,  if  wisely  and  strenuously  fulfilled, 
may  produce  the  most  important  results,  immediately 
among  Protestants,  and  mediately  among  Roman 
Catholics.  The  Protestants  are  now  inquiring,  with 
a  spirit  of  hostility,  it  may  be,  but  still  they  are 
inquiring,  and  are  therefore  no  longer  indifferent. 
And  the  result  will  be,  that  ere  long  they  will  be 
led  to  seek  from  us  that  which  is  wanting  among 
themselves.  And  the  more  candid  members  of  the 
Church  of  Rome,  when  they  see  that  want  supplied, 
and  a  great  error  rectified  among  so  influential  a 
portion  of  their  countrymen,  may  be  gradually  led  to 
merge  the  distinction  of  Romanist  in  a  general 
Catholicity.  Thus  it  is  not  too  much  to  indulge  the 


11 


hope,  that,  with  God's  blessing,  the  apostolicity  of 
Protestant  Germany  and  the  reformation  of  Ro- 
manist Germany  may,  in  after  ages,  be  ascribed  to 
us  as  instruments. 

It  has  seemed  not  altogether  out  of  place  to  en- 
large upon  this  matter,  as  prefatory  to  the  more 
immediate  object  of  requesting  your  Lordship's  at- 
tention to  the  condition  of  the  Anglican  congrega- 
tions in  Germany.  That  our  holy  services  should  be 
performed  well  and  unto  edification  at  all  times,  and 
in  all  places,  must  be  the  heart's  desire  of  every 
pious  Churchman.  But  if  there  ever  was  a  time 
when  it  was  more  especially  to  be  desired  that  we 
should  appear  on  vantage  ground,  that  time  is  the 
present.  And  if  there  ever  was  a  place,  where,  with 
a  view  to  our  increased  usefulness,  it  was  necessary 
that  our  zeal  should  be  adorned  with  piety  and 
graced  by  wisdom,  that  place  is  Germany.  Were 
our  congregations  in  that  country  no  more  in  number 
than  one  or  two,  they  should  be  still  carefully  at- 
tended to,  and  should  be  supplied  with  such  pastors 
as  might  not  only  be  ensamples  to  their  flocks,  but 
also  favourable  specimens  of  the  clergy  of  our  Church 
before  the  eyes  of  the  two  great  divisions  of  Western 
Christendom,  who  are  now  busily  scrutinizing  all 
our  acts,  and  listening  with  anxious  attention  to  all 
our  words.  But  the  necessity  for  this  is  daily  be- 
coming greater,  because  the  number  of  Anglican 
congregations  in  Germany  has  of  late  much  increased, 
and  is  even  now  increasing.  And  this  will  probably 


12 


go  on  progressively,  from  the  number  of  our  country- 
men, who,  unfortunately,  from  various  causes,  are 
settling  more  or  less  permanently  in  almost  every 
considerable  European  city ;  and  perhaps  with  greater 
advantage  to  themselves  in  those  of  Germany,  than 
in  those  of  any  other  foreign  country. 

It  will  scarcely  be  disputed,  that  wherever  we  have 
an  ambassador  or  minister,  there  ought  to  be  a  regular 
chaplain.  And  although  this  want  has  not  yet  been 
fully  supplied,  our  increasing  sense  of  the  expediency 
of  the  measure  promises  a  speedy  remedy.  In  Dres- 
den, a  year  ago,  a  large  and  influential  English 
society  were  in  the  habit  of  attending  the  ministry 
of  a  Lutheran  pastor,  who  read  the  English  Service, 
and  preached  in  the  English  language  for  their  pecu- 
liar benefit.  And,  strange  to  say,  an  Anglican  Bishop 
and  two  Presbyters,  who  were  domiciled  at  Dresden, 
thought  proper  themselves  to  form  a  portion  of  the 
flock.  A  singular  irregularity,  which  would  have 
been  prevented  if  there  had  been  a  chaplain  attached 
to  the  legation.  This  is,  as  we  understand,  now  in 
some  measure  remedied,  by  the  presence  of  an  offici- 
ating English  clergyman  in  that  city ;  though  we 
know  not  with  what  prospect  of  permanency.  In 
Berlin,  which  is  certainly  the  city  in  Germany 
where  we  have  most  reason  to  wish  our  Church  to  be 
fully  and  efficiently  represented,  there  is  no  Anglican 
chaplain  or  clergyman  whatever.  And  even  were  the 
English  there  scarcely  in  sufficient  numbers  to  form 
a  congregation,  our  legation  at  the  Prussian  court 


13 


ought,  for  reasons  too  obvious  to  require  explana- 
tion, to  be  provided  with  an  able  chaplain,  who 
might  exercise  a  conciliatory  influence  both  with 
the  laity  and  the  clergy,  in  a  city  which  is  the  centre 
of  German  philosophy  and  learning,  and  where  the 
king  is  an  admirer  of  Anglican  Institutions.  Yet 
even  in  Berlin,  where  there  is  proverbially  no  foreign 
society,  and  where  the  only  English  house  is  that  of 
the  minister ;  a  nobleman  who  very  lately  held  that 
situation  there,  surprised  me  by  assuring  me  that 
a  chaplain  was  greatly  needed,  on  account  of  many 
of  our  countrymen  settled  there  as  operatives  in  the 
employment  of  some  long  established  English  master 
manufacturers. 

In  the  following  list,  I  do  not  pledge  myself  to  an 
exact  enumeration  of  all  the  English  congregations 
which  have  been  formed  in  Germany ;  for  as  I  have 
lately  seen  large  ones  in  places  where  I  had  been 
previously  unconscious  of  their  existence,  there  may, 
in  like  manner,  now  be  some  of  which  we  in  this 
country  are  ignorant.  But  taking  it  for  granted  that 
if  there  are  not  chaplains,  there  at  least  ought  to  be, 
in  every  place  where  we  have  an  ambassador  or  minis- 
ter, let  us  thus  reckon  them ;  Vienna,  Berlin,  Dres- 
den, Munich,  Stutgard,  Carlsruhe,  Hanover,  Franc- 
fort  and  Hamburgh.  Besides  these  nine  2  principal 
stations,  there  are  several  towns,  (some  of  them  con- 

2  Carlsruhe  is  not,  indeed,  the  seat  of  a  separate  legation,  as 
our  minister  at  the  court  of  Wirtemberg  is  also  accredited  to 
that  of  Baden.  But  it  is  a  town  where  there  are  respectable 


14 


taining  baths  and  mineral  waters,)  which  have  be- 
come permanent  abodes  of  many  English  families, 
such  as  Manheim,  Bonn,  Coblenz,  Ems,  Baden  Baden, 
Heidelberg,  and  Wiesbaden.  And  there  are  some 
baths  very  numerously  attended  during  summer  and 
autumn,  where  service  has  been  for  a  considerable 
time  regularly  performed,  such  as  Carlsbad  and  Kis~ 
singen ;  and  others  where  it  ought  to  be  performed, 
such  as  Aix  la  Chapelle  and  Marienbad.  In  addition 
to  these,  there  are  large  cities  containing  many 
English  residents,  such  as  Dantzig  and  Lubeck  on 
the  coast  of  the  Baltic,  and  Trieste  on  the  Adriatic, 
where,  if  congregations  do  not  already  exist,  they 
may  probably  soon  be  formed. 

We  may  thus  calculate  the  number  of  English 
congregations  in  Germany,  which  either  do  actually 
exist,  or  of  which  the  existence  may  be  considered 
necessary,  at  not  less  than  twenty-two,  without  cross- 
ing the  frontier  either  towards  Switzerland  or  Holland. 
Here  then  is  a  pastoral  care  in  itself  most  import- 
ant, but  which  the  peculiar  circumstances  already  ad- 
verted to,  render  infinitely  more  so.  A  pastoral 
care,  which  might  almost  rival  in  importance  that 
which  has  just  been  committed  to  the  Bishop  whom 
we  have  sent  to  Malta  and  Gibraltar,  and  which 
very  greatly  surpasses  in  immediate  importance  (in 
so  far  at  least,  as  relates  to  the  number  of  the  flock) 
that  which  has  been  placed  under  the  Anglican 

English  families  resident,  and  through  which  many  English  are 
constantly  passing. 


15 


Bishop  in  Palestine.  Here  is  an  important  addition 
to  the  already  overwhelming  cares  of  the  Prelate 
whom  I  have  the  honour  to  address,  and  whose  life 
has  been  an  unwearied  endeavour  to  bring  piety  and 
energy  to  bear  upon  as  great  a  load  of  responsibility 
as  ever  pressed  upon  man,  since  the  days  of  him, 
who  conscious  indeed  of  infirmity,  but  also  conscious 
of  the  honest  discharge  of  duty,  exclaimed,  "  Besides 
those  things  which  are  without,  that  which  cometh 
upon  me  daily,  the  care  of  all  the  Churches." 

Let  us  inquire,  what  is  the  state  of  ecclesiastical 
discipline  among  our  congregations  in  that  part  of  the 
Continent,  where  it  most  of  all  behoves  us  to  appear 
with  the  full  advantages  of  our  system.  Where  there 
is  a  regular  chaplain  attached  to  an  embassy  or  consu- 
late, the  episcopal  power  is  immediately  felt  and  can 
be  enforced.  But  in  other  cases,  (for  anything  that 
exists  in  order  to  prevent  such  a  scandal,)  it  is  pos- 
sible that  a  place  selected  as  a  residence  by  a  num- 
ber of  pious,  well  educated,  and  distinguished  En- 
glishmen, may  be  inflicted  with  the  ministry  of  a 
most  improper  clergyman.  One,  for  instance,  who 
has  been  deprived  of  his  living  or  cure  of  souls  for 
some  gross  fault,  or  who  has  incurred  the  censure  of 
his  ordinary  for  some  great  error  in  doctrine.  Or 
one,  on  the  other  hand,  who  is  incompetent  to  fulfil 
the  ministerial  functions  decently  and  creditably, 
from  folly  or  defective  judgment. 

In  either  case,  the  ministrations  of  such  a  man 
must  bring  our  Church  into  disrepute  among  stran- 

7 


16 


gers,  and  even  among  our  own  countrymen,  as  soon 
as  they  shall  have  discovered  the  character  and  quali- 
fications of  their  pastor.  It  might  be  expected, 
indeed,  that  the  effect  of  this  discovery  would  be 
to  withdraw  from  him  countenance  and  support. 
But  this  does  not  by  any  means  follow.  Having 
arrived  amidst  a  considerable  colony  of  his  country- 
men, who  have  long  been  anxious  to  enjoy  the 
privileges  of  orderly  worship  and  sacraments,  and 
being  personally  unknown  for  good  or  for  evil, 
he  announces  his  clerical  position,  and  finds  ready 
and  probably  uninquiring  aid  in  collecting  a  congre- 
gation. And  having  once  acquired  a  footing  and 
made  a  party,  the  subsequent  discovery  of  worth- 
lessness  and  insufficiency  will  probably  not  remove 
him.  This  may  proceed  from  motives  not  altogether 
the  reverse  of  praiseworthy  on  the  part  of  the  con- 
gregation. An  unwillingness  to  listen  to  testimony 
as  to  former  misdeeds ;  a  disinclination  to  be  again 
deprived  of  the  ordinances  of  worship  ;  add  to  these 
the  spirit  of  party,  which  never  predominates  more 
any  where  than  among  the  English  residents  in  a 
foreign  town. 

But  it  is  not  alone  by  a  mere  private  performance 
of  our  services  that  this  deprived,  or  suspended,  or 
incompetent  clergyman  may  lower  the  ministerial 
office.  He  may  assume  the  character  of  chaplain  to 
his  countrymen,  give  formal  notice  of  public  wor- 
ship, and  make  general  contributions  among  them, 
in  order  that  he  who  ministers  at  the  altar  may  live 


17 


by  the  altar.  Evil  reports  may  be  spread  on  good 
authority,  or  his  incompetency  may  be  manifest. 
The  one  is  treated  as  vague  rumour,  and  the  other 
as  ill-natured  censoriousness  by  the  party  who,  having 
taken  him  up,  are  resolved  to  carry  him  through  his 
troubles.  Thus,  the  whole  affair  becomes  an  ex- 
citing occupation  to  a  number  of  unemployed  En- 
glish men  in  a  second-rate  continental  town ;  and 
indeed,  there  are  not  wanting  recent  and  melancholy 
instances  of  the  fierceness  and  violence  which  have 
proceeded,  under  such  circumstances,  from  disagree- 
ments concerning  the  ministry  of  peace. 

The  English  residents  in  a  town  where  there  is  no 
representative  of  our  government,  and  no  chaplain 
paid  by  our  government,  have  generally  a  very  in- 
distinct notion  of  the  extent  of  episcopal  superinten- 
dence over  such  a  congregation  as  I  have  supposed. 
And  at  any  rate,  the  prelate,  under  whose  jurisdic- 
tion they  properly  are,  is  at  a  distance,  and  may  have 
been  misinformed ;  or  his  opinion  or  sentence,  if 
expressed,  may  be  wilfully  misinterpreted.  The 
cry  of  hardship  and  persecution  may  be  raised,  and 
sectarian  motives  may  be  mixed  up  with  those  of 
party.  In  short,  it  may  be  difficult,  or  impossible,  to 
enforce  the  will  of  the  Bishop  in  places  where  there 
is  neither  ambassador  nor  consul,  and  where  the 
British  government  does  not  contribute  to  the  pay- 
ment of  the  clergyman.  That  a  stubborn  party, 
when  once  fairly  formed  in  a  continental  town,  might 
set  your  Lordship's  authority  at  defiance,  is  rendered 

B 


18 


but  too  evident  by  the  unhappy  prevalence  of  schisms 
among  ourselves ;  many  of  them  arising  from  per- 
sonal feelings,  rather  than  from  conscientious,  but 
mistaken  considerations.  The  great  object,  there- 
fore, ought  to  be,  to  begin  from  the  first  with  so 
strict  a  discipline  as  to  render  such  a  state  of  things 
impossible. 

I.  In  order  to  prevent  a  disreputable  or  incompe- 
tent person  from  taking  upon  him  to  minister,  either 
privately  or  publicly,  in  a  foreign  land,  a  general 
rule  might  be  established  in  the  Church,  permitting 
no  clergyman  to  officiate  in  any  way  to  a  congrega- 
tion of  his  countrymen  abroad,  without  a  testimonial 
from  the  Bishop  in  whose  diocese  his  living  or  cu- 
racy is  situated ;  or  if  he  have  no  actual  cure  of 
souls,  from  the  last  Bishop  under  whom  he  has  had 
one.  And  in  case  he  never  has  had  a  cure,  but  has 
been  ordained  on  a  fellowship,  he  should  have  a  testi- 
monial from  the  president  or  warden  of  his  college, 
countersigned  by  the  Diocesan  of  his  University.  A 
necessity  for  this  testimonial  would  impose  no  hard- 
ship on  a  clergyman  about  to  go  abroad,  as,  to  obtain 
it  previous  to  a  departure  for  the  continent,  would 
become  a  matter  of  course,  even  as  it  is  to  procure  a 
passport.  And  no  one  neglecting  to  do  this  should 
be  entitled  to  minister  either  publicly  or  privately  to 
his  countrymen.  It  is  true  that  compulsion  could  not 
be  used  in  order  to  enforce  this  rule,  neither  could 
its  infraction  be  visited  easily  with  punishment.  But 
if  such  a  rule  were  once  established,  a  neglect  to 


19 


comply  with  it  would  stamp  a  clergyman  with  a 
suspicious  character,  and  render  his  ministrations 
unwelcome  to  those  of  his  countrymen  who  were 
sound  churchmen.  For  no  one  who  desired  to  main- 
tain the  integrity  of  the  Church  of  England,  or  who 
valued  the  preservation  of  decent  order  in  her  wor- 
ship, would  attend  the  Service,  if  performed  by  a 
clergyman  who  could  not  produce  this  document. 

II.  While  a  right  to  perform  any  ministerial  act 
whatever,  would  thus  be  denied  to  all  who  had  not 
a  proper  licence,  the  more  formal  discharge  of  the 
sacred  office  ought  to  be  protected  by  still  stronger 
securities.  This  might  be  accomplished  by  an  enact- 
ment, that  no  clergyman  should  be  permitted  to 
assume,  in  a  foreign  country,  the  title  of  chaplain  to 
the  English,  or  to  have  a  committee,  or  to  open  a 
subscription  book,  or  to  receive  pecuniary  remunera- 
tion for  his  services,  without  having  previously  ob- 
tained from  your  Lordship  an  express  licence  for  the 
particular  scene  of  his  ministry.  This  also  is  a  regu- 
lation which  would  have  force  only  among  the  willing 
and  obedient.  It  might  be  impossible  for  the  Dio- 
cesan to  maintain  discipline  in  a  foreign  country.  A 
clergyman  without  licence  might  publicly  minister, 
and  receive  pecuniary  compensation  for  his  ministry, 
and  a  number  of  Englishmen  might  give  him  counte- 
nance and  support.  But  even  so,  the  Church  cannot 
exercise  power  to  prevent  violent  acts  of  insubordi- 
nation at  home,  since  a  rebellious  clergyman  may 
place  himself  at  the  head  of  a  secession,  and  many 

B2 


20 


thoughtless  or  evil  disposed  persons  may  join  in  his 
schism 3.  In  the  one  case  as  well  as  in  the  other  it 
would  be  an  act  of  schism,  and  the  parties  thus 
offending  would,  by  this  act,  be  separating  from  the 
communion  of  the  Church. 

But  the  authority  of  the  Bishop's  licence  might  be 
protected  by  an  additional  security,  besides  that  of 
respect  and  influence.  The  government  of  foreign 
states  (we  are  speaking  more  particularly  of  Ger- 
many) might  be  generally  requested  not  to  sanction 
or  permit  the  public  performance  of  the  Anglican 
service  by  any  one  who  is  not  authorised  to  do  so  by 
your  Lordship's  licence.  This  is  a  measure  which 
they  would  perfectly  understand,  for  it  is  similar  to 
those  to  which  they  are  accustomed  at  home.  And 

3  Since  these  words  were  first  written,  they  have  been  verified 
by  the  grievous  act  of  schism  which  is  even  now  taking  place  in 
the  Church  of  Scotland,  in  the  diocese  of  Edinburgh,  where  a 
presbyter,  in  defiance  of  his  Bishop,  has  become  minister  of  a  con- 
gregation of  Independents,  and  is  said  still  to  consider  himself  a 
member  of  the  Anglican  Church.  May  not  the  Church  of  Scot- 
land expect,  and  may  not  the  Church  of  England  respectfully 
hope,  that  the  highest  authorities  of  the  communion  in  which  this 
unhappy  person  was  ordained  as  a  minister,  will  take  some  method 
of  expressing  their  disapprobation  of  conduct  which  strikes  at  the 
root  of  all  ecclesiastical  subordination  ?  We  are  surely  called  upon 
to  discourage  schism,  not  only  in  our  own,  but  in  every  orthodox 
and  regular  branch  of  the  Church  of  Christ.  If  the  Scottish  Church 
is  in  full  spiritual  communion  with  that  of  England,  a  congrega- 
tion that  has  wilfully  separated  itself  from  the  former  cannot  be 
in  communion  with  the  latter,  and,  consequently,  both  minister 
and  people  are  schismatics,  and  should  be  noted  as  such. 


21 


it  is  not  proposed  hereby  to  abridge  the  liberty  which 
every  clergyman,  who  possessed  the  first  mentioned 
testimonial  of  his  own  diocesan,  might  enjoy,  of  per- 
forming divine  service  privately  in  his  own  house  to 
his  friends,  or  in  their  houses.  It  is  only  intended 
in  order  to  prevent  any  one,  without  the  licence  of 
the  Continental  Diocesan,  assuming  the  public  office 
of  minister,  collecting  subscriptions,  and  making  it 
an  object  of  interest  and  gain  ;  and  moreover,  to 
enable  the  Bishop  to  put  a  stop  to  improper  conduct, 
by  depriving  the  clergyman  of  his  licence.  Above 
all,  it  is  designed  in  order  to  prevent  the  possibility 
of  collision  between  clergymen  and  disputed  juris- 
diction ;  each  pastoral  cure  being  almost  as  strictly 
defined  thereby  as  a  cure  at  home ;  and  it  being  as 
little  competent  for  any  one,  without  abandoning 
sound  church  principles,  to  interfere  with  the  minis- 
try of  a  clergyman  thus  licensed,  as  it  would  be  at 
home  to  interrupt  the  pastoral  functions  of  a  regu- 
larly appointed  parochial  minister. 

Thus  the  obligation  to  produce  a  testimonial  from 
his  own  diocesan,  would  in  all  cases  check  an  as- 
sumption of  the  pastoral  office  by  the  unworthy,  or 
the  grossly  incompetent.  While  the  necessity  for 
your  Lordship's  licence  would  prevent  the  possibility 
of  such  collisions  and  disputes  between  clergymen, 
as  have  been  ere  now  unhappily  witnessed.  And  at 
the  same  time,  it  would  add  a  degree  of  responsibility 
and  consistency  to  the  position  of  a  chaplain,  favour- 
able alike  to  the  preservation  of  his  influence  among 


22 


his  countrymen,  and  to  the  increase  of  his  respecta- 
bility among  the  people  of  a  foreign  country,  and  the 
ministers  of  other  communions,  among  whom  his  lot 
may  be  cast.  In  a  town  where  there  is  an  English 
resident  or  consul,  and  where  the  chaplain  is  paid  by 
the  government,  these  objects  are,  or  ought  to  be, 
already  attained.  But  in  places  where  England  is 
not  represented,  and  yet  where  Englishmen  abound, 
there  is  much  room  for  irregularity.  But  the  pro- 
posed rule  would  place  the  Anglican  chaplain,  every 
where  abroad,  as  completely  under  Episcopal  juris- 
diction as  it  is  possible  for  him  to  be,  out  of  his 
native  country  and  its  dependencies. 

This  subject  has  been  more  particularly  suggested 
by  an  instance  of  the  full  evil  of  the  present  irregu- 
larity, which  was  very  lately  forced  on  my  notice. 
The  names  of  the  parties  in  question,  as  well  as  the 
merits  of  the  case,  in  so  far  as  depends  upon  the 
conduct  and  character  of  individuals,  shall  not  be 
given,  as  a  full  disclosure  might  not  be  agreeable  to 
all  of  them,  and  is  wholly  unnecessary.  No  remarks 
will  be  made  which  can  be  justly  considered  offen- 
sive. Only  certain  facts  will  be  stated,  in  order  to 
show  the  evil  consequences  of  want  of  discipline, 
and  how  these  consequences  might  have  been  ob- 
viated, if  some  such  plans  as  those  suggested  above 
had  been  acted  upon. 

Within  the  last  few  years,  the  number  of  English 
visitors  at  the  baths  of  Carlsbad  has  very  greatly 
increased  ;  and  three  summers  ago,  a  considerable 


23 


congregation  was  formed,  who  invited  a  clergyman  to 
minister  to  them,  who  had,  at  that  time,  no  permanent 
duty,  but  had  been  travelling  in  various  parts  of  the 
Continent,  and  came  to  Carlsbad,  it  is  believed,  on 
account  of  his  health.  The  Rev.  Mr..  A.  had  of 
course  no  testimonial,  such  as  that  which  we  have 
suggested ;  but  he  was  received  as  a  clergyman,  it  is 
presumed,  upon  showing  his  letters  of  orders.  The 
service  was  permitted  by  the  Austrian  authorities, 
as  one  of  a  strictly  private  nature ;  but  among  the 
English  residents  it  was  public,  inasmuch  as  Mr.  A. 
had  a  collection-book,  received  pecuniary  compen- 
sation, and  was  in  all  respects  considered  as  chaplain 
to  the  English.  At  the  commencement  of  the  fol- 
lowing summer,  Mr.  A.  being  still  without  any  other 
permanent  clerical  duties,  returned  to  Carlsbad,  and 
again  undertook  our  Church  services.  There  were 
several  other  clergymen  of  the  English  Church  resi- 
dent there  during  one  or  other  portions  of  that 
season,  but  they  considered  it  due  to  Mr.  A.  to 
regard  him  as  the  English  chaplain,  he  having  offi- 
ciated in  a  former  year,  and  having  then  already 
recommenced  the  services,  in  which,  however,  they 
afforded  him  very  considerable  assistance. 

But  with  the  commencement  of  this  last  season  of 
1842,  unanimity  ceased.  During  the  spring  another 
clergyman,  also  of  course  unfurnished  with  any 
testimonial  such  as  that  above  suggested,  Mr.  B., 
an  old  man,  who  had  been  absent  from  England  for 
very  many  years,  and  had  officiated  in  more  than 


24 


one  continental  town,  arrived  at  Carlsbad.  He  im- 
mediately assumed  the  title  of  chaplain  to  the  Eng- 
lish, at  the  invitation  of  three  individuals,  who  hap- 
pened to  be  there  thus  early,  hired  a  room,  published 
an  advertisement,  opened  a  subscription-book,  and 
commenced  a  pecuniary  collection  by  application  to 
each  successive  new  comer.  After  he  had  been 
officiating  for  some  time,  just  as  the  season  of  the 
baths  was  beginning,  Mr.  A.  arrived,  with  the  inten- 
tion of  ministering  again,  as  he  had  done  during  the 
two  preceding  summers :  but  Mr.  B.  would  not  resign. 
If  the  one  pleaded  prescription,  the  other  pleaded 
possession.  And  where  neither  party  had  a  real 
right,  who  was  to  decide  ? 

Here  then,  was  a  full  display  of  the  evil  to  which 
the  attention  of  your  Lordship  is  now  respectfully 
called,  in  the  hope  that  it  may  be  remedied.  Neither 
Mr.  A.  nor  Mr.  B.  possessed  such  a  testimonial  as 
that  which  is  here  proposed,  as  a  sine  qua  non  in  similar 
cases.  Their  claim,  therefore,  to  be  received  by  their 
countrymen  as  duly  qualified  by  conduct  and  acquire- 
ments to  minister  in  sacred  things,  rested  on  what- 
ever private  means  they  had  of  proving  a  good 
reputation.  And  neither  Mr.  A.  nor  Mr.  B.  pos- 
sessed a  licence  from  your  Lordship,  sanctioning  their 
performance  of  the  office  of  chaplain  at  Carlsbad. 
This  would  at  once  have  settled  the  question  and 
ended  the  dispute.  But  as  it  was,  the  effects  of  this 
want  of  discipline  became  a  matter  of  surprise  and 
scandal  to  the  clergy  and  laity  of  most  European 


25 


countries  and  Christian  denominations,  who  happened 
to  be  assembled  at  Carlsbad — Episcopal  Lutherans 
from  Sweden,  bishops,  professors,  and  civilians ;  Ger- 
man and  Hungarian  Lutherans,  superintendents,  pas- 
tors, and  people ;  Greeks  and  Roman  Catholics  of  all 
ranks  and  degrees,  patriarchs,  bishops,  priests,  and 
princes,  were  witnesses  to  our  disunion,  and  made 
our  Church  a  by-word. 

Mr.  A.,  who,  it  is  only  due  to  him  to  say,  acted  in 
the  whole  affair  with  great  propriety  and  moderation, 
would  not  for  some  time  commence  an  opposition 
service,  in  order  to  avoid  the  appearance  of  schism. 
But  many  English  arrived  at  Carlsbad,  who,  for 
reasons  which  seemed  satisfactory  to  themselves, 
would  have  no  ministerial  intercourse  whatever  with 
Mr.  B.,  declining  to  attend  his  service,  and  refusing 
to  admit  his  claim  to  be  chaplain  to  the  English; 
and  some  of  these,  moreover,  had  attended  the  minis- 
try of  Mr.  A.  during  a  former  year.  It  was,  there- 
fore, at  length  judged  expedient  to  have  another 
service,  at  which  Mr.  A.  officiated,  with  the  constant 
assistance  of  several  other  English  clergymen  resident 
at  Carlsbad,  and  with  a  larger  congregation  than  the 
other.  The  Austrian  authorities,  however,  regarded 
this  apparent  schism  with  displeasure.  And  the  Bur- 
grave  of  Prague  directed  the  Inspector  of  Police  at 
Carlsbad  to  use  means  to  put  a  stop  to  the  second 
service.  And,  indeed,  it  was  only  owing  to  the 
liberality  and  kindness  of  that  functionary,  to  whom 
the  peculiar  circumstances  of  the  case  were  made 


known,  and  who  saw  that  the  proscribed  congrega- 
tion was  the  more  numerous  and  respectable  of  the 
two,  that  the  majority  of  the  English  were  not  alto- 
gether deprived  of  the  blessing  of  social  worship. 
For  very  many,  at  least,  declared  that  they  would 
have  found  it  quite  impossible  to  attend  the  ministry 
of  Mr.  B 

Thus  was  exhibited  on  every  Lord's  day,  the 
melancholy  spectacle  of  two  rival  congregations,  who 
crossed  each  other's  path,  instead  of  proceeding  to 
the  house  of  God  as  friends.  The  evil  which  this 
state  of  things  produced,  not  only  among  our  own 
countrymen,  but  among  the  foreigners  of  various 
communions,  who  held  this  English  schism  in  deri- 
sion, pressed  with  peculiar  force  on  several  of  the 
Anglican  clergymen  who  were  witnesses  to  it.  And 
they  did  all  that,  under  the  circumstances,  appeared 
to  them  to  be  possible.  They  addressed  an  official 
letter  to  your  Lordship,  as  Diocesan  of  the  Continent, 
stating  the  very  disadvantageous  position  in  which 
the  Church  of  England  had  been  placed,  their  own 
deep  sorrow,  and  their  fervent  wish  that  a  recurrence 
of  such  scenes  should  be  prevented.  And,  moreover, 
they  ventured  to  entreat  that  your  Lordship  would 
take  some  effectual  means  to  prevent,  in  future,  any 
similar  scandal. 

These  details,  although  they  relate  to  a  small 
number  of  our  countrymen  in  a  distant  land,  and  to 
an  event  which  is  past,  and  will  soon  be  forgotten  by 
them,  are  not  however  of  trivial  importance.  For  it  is 


impossible  to  measure  the  extent  of  prejudice  against 
our  Church,  which  this  most  unseemly  rivalry  and 
contention  about  sacred  things  may  have  produced 
in  the  minds  of  the  eye-witnesses  of  it,  belonging  to 
other  communions,  Greek,  Lutheran,  and  Romanist. 
And  unless  the  proper  Ecclesiastical  authorities  en- 
force some  such  regulations  as  those  which  have  been 
suggested  in  these  pages,  or  some  regulations  still  more 
effective,  as  shall  seem  best  to  their  wisdom,  it  may  be 
impossible  to  prevent  a  frequent  recurrence  of  such 
disgraceful  scenes.  Indeed,  to  those  who  have  been 
much  on  the  continent,  the  numerous  disputes  and 
quarrels  which  have  arisen  concerning  the  perform- 
ance of  our  services,  have  been  a  frequent  cause  of 
mortification  and  shame,  of  busy  gossip,  or  of  irre- 
verent sarcasm,  according  to  the  disposition  of  the 
individuals.  And  most  especially,  our  great  and 
increasing  intercourse  with  Germany,  our  peculiar 
position  with  respect  to  its  most  powerful  Protestant 
communion,  and  the  great  attention  which  every  act 
of  ours  excites,  as  well  among  Protestants  as  Roman 
Catholics  in  that  country,  combine  to  give  a  peculiar 
importance  to  all  our  measures  in  reference  to  it ; 
and  to  demand  that  above  all,  in  matters  of  religion, 
every  thing  should  be  performed  in  the  most  edifying 
and  dignified  manner. 

III.  These  considerations,  indeed,  would  seem  to 
render  a  further  measure  expedient,  viz.  that  our 
congregations  in  Germany  should  be  placed  under 
some  more  immediate  superintendence  than  that 

12 


28 


which  it  is  possible  for  your  Lordship  personally  to 
bestow.  And  this  superintendence  might  be  exer- 
cised either  by  a  Presbyter,  who  should  possess  no 
jurisdiction  beyond  a  delegated  one,  as  your  lordship's 
commissary ;  or  by  a  clergyman  episcopally  conse- 
crated, and  having  the  English  congregations  in  that 
portion  of  the  continent  as  his  diocese. 

I  would  crave  your  Lordship's  indulgence,  when  I 
attempt  briefly  to  consider  these  alternatives,  with 
their  advantages  and  objections. 

It  might  be  said,  without  entering  into  the  merits 
of  the  question,  that  there  seemed  a  sort  of  Ecclesi- 
astical symmetry,  (if  one  may  use  this  expression)  in 
sending  an  Anglican  Bishop  to  minister  to  our 
countrymen  sojourning  in  a  Protestant  land,  as  we 
have  already  supplied  the  wants  of  the  English  re- 
sidents in  the  Roman  Catholic  countries  of  the  south 
of  Europe,  by  bestowing  a  Bishop  upon  them.  This 
would  be  a  practical  illustration  in  the  eyes  of  Europe 
of  our  position,  the  via  media;  and  it  would  be  a  dis- 
tinct recognition  of  the  necessity  of  guarding  our 
people  against  two  opposite  extremes  of  religious 
error,  and  of  providing  for  their  continuance  in  a 
right  path  with  a  right  form,  by  furnishing  them  with 
a  full  development  of  our  Ecclesiastical  system  for 
their  spiritual  nourishment  and  growth  in  grace. 

If  it  be  objected  against  sending  a  Bishop  to  Ger- 
many, that  he  would  have  no  district  for  his  diocese, 
it  may  be  replied  that  this  was  the  position  of  the 
Apostles  themselves.  Though  it  is  doubtless  true 


29 


that,  from  the  necessity  of  the  case,  they  were  in  the 
strictest  sense  missionary  bishops,  their  diocese  being 
the  widest  extent  of  the  world,  into  which  they  were 
sent  forth  by  our  Saviour  himself.  And  we  have, 
moreover,  reason  to  believe  that  diocesan  Bishops 
were  appointed  as  soon  as  the  Church  had  advanced 
to  such  a  state  of  forwardness  as  to  admit  of  it ; 
witness  the  examples  of  Timothy  in  Ephesus,  Titus 
in  Crete,  and  the  angels  of  the  Asiatic  Churches. 
Onr  Church  has  also  very  lately  sent  a  Bishop  to  the 
Holy  Land,  who  cannot  be  said,  strictly  speaking,  to 
have  a  district  for  his  diocese.  But  Palestine  being 
a  land  emptied  of  its  proper  inhabitants,  has  been 
and  is,  as  it  were,  the  common  ground  of  Christen- 
dom, where  almost  every  great  Christian  communion 
has  a  representative.  And  we  have  now  only  claimed 
the  privilege  of  a  full  development  of  our  branch  of 
the  Church,  in  a  place  where  other  Christian  commu- 
nions have  been  fully  developed  for  ages. 

A  case  perhaps  still  more  in  point,  is  the  Bishop 
whom  we  have  lately  sent  to  Gibraltar  and  Malta.  For 
though  these  seats  of  his  Episcopate  are  stations 
which  form  part  of  the  territorial  possessions  of  Great 
Britain,  his  jurisdiction  extends  over  congregations 
widely  scattered  in  lands  inhabited  by  other  branches 
of  the  Christian  Church.  On  the  shores  of  the 
Mediterranean  there  exists  a  national  establishment, 
which  though  greatly  erring,  is,  strictly  speaking, 
more  ecclesiastically  regular  than  that  of  Germany; 
and  as  we  scruple  not  to  send  a  Bishop  to  the  former, 


30 


there  is  no  reason  why  we  should  not  send  one  to  the 
latter  also. 

It  might  be  objected,  that  the  appointment  of  a 
Bishop  for  the  continent  recognizes  an  unnatural 
state  of  society,  of  which  the  existence,  to  its  actual 
extent,  is  a  serious  evil,  and  of  which  the  continu- 
ance is  to  be  deprecated,  viz.,  a  population  existing, 
and  a  generation  arising,  of  Englishmen  aliens  to 
England,  and  permanent  inhabitants  of  lands  differ- 
ing in  religious  principles,  moral  feelings,  and  social 
usages  from  their  native  country.  This  is  at  best  a 
grievance,  and  although  it  is  one  which  may  probably 
continue,  it  may  be  deemed  questionable  whether  it 
ought  further  to  be  sanctioned  by  any  solemn  act  of 
the  Church  or  legislature.  Yet,  on  the  other  hand, 
it  may  reasonably  be  urged  that  the  most  ample 
pastoral  superintendence  is  nowhere  more  truly  re- 
quired than  by  the  youth  of  a  half  English,  half 
foreign  population,  deprived  of  many  of  the  natural 
feelings  of  Englishmen,  without  being  able  to  iden- 
tify themselves  with  those  of  the  people  among  whom 
they  sojourn ;  and  thus  in  danger  of  losing  the  best 
points  of  the  English  character,  without  the  possi- 
bility of  gaining  an  honest  nationality  elsewhere  in 
exchange. 

It  may  be  urged  against  the  appointment  of  a 
Bishop,  that  it  has  already  been  tried  in  the  case 
of  France ;  aud  that  the  result  can  scarcely  be 
regarded  as  satisfactory.  But  this  trial  cannot  be 
considered  a  fair  one,  from  the  peculiarity  of  the 


31 


circumstances,  and  the  embarrassed  nature  of  the 
Episcopal  jurisdiction.  For,  although  the  clergyman 
who  exercises  the  functions  of  chaplain  to  the  British 
Ambassador  at  Paris,  has  received  episcopal  consecra- 
tion from  our  daughter  Church  in  Scotland,  he  was 
in  our  Church  nothing  more  than  a  Presbyter,  and 
he  has,  or  had,  no  jurisdiction  whatever  over  the 
Anglican  clergy  in  France  or  anywhere  else,  except 
such  as  your  Lordship  may  have  thought  proper  to 
delegate  to  him  as  your  commissary  :  which  authority 
might  as  well  have  been  delegated  to  him,  had  he 
remained  in  the  position  of  a  Presbyter.  This  trial 
therefore,  of  an  Englishman  of  the  episcopal  order, 
residing  on  the  continent,  cannot  properly  be  ad- 
duced as  a  case  in  point,  on  account  of  the  ano- 
malous position  of  him  who  holds  the  Episcopate, 
belonging,  as  he  does,  to  another  Church,  and  any 
jurisdiction  which  he  may  ever  have  had,  being  dis- 
tinct and  separate  therefrom. 

Another  objection  to  the  appointment  of  a  Bishop 
seems  to  be,  that  it  would  be  sending  out  a  clergy- 
man of  the  highest  order,  without  at  the  same  time 
securing  to  him  a  permanent  field  of  exertion.  The 
present  lengthened  peace  may  be  succeeded  by  a 
general  European  war,  in  which,  above  all  other 
countries,  Germany,  the  centre  of  Europe,  is  sure  to 
be  engaged ;  and  in  such  a  case,  the  objects  of  the 
Bishop's  pastoral  care  would  be  scattered,  and  his 
office  would  be  rendered  superfluous. 

But  the  principal  ground  of  inexpediency  which 


might  be  brought  forward  against  the  appointment  of 
a  Bishop  to  Germany,  seems  to  me  to  result  rather 
from  the  circumstances  of  the  present  time,  than 
from  any  permanent  objection.  I  have  already  re- 
marked, that  the  Church  of  England  is  regarded  by 
the  people  of  Germany  with  an  intense  and  jealous 
interest.  The  Protestants  of  that  country  would 
consider  this  measure  as  the  second  step  in  an  ag- 
gressive course,  of  which  many  of  them  look  upon 
the  Jerusalem  Bishopric  as  the  commencement ;  and 
which  has  for  its  imagined  object  the  subjugation  of 
the  religious  nationality  of  Germany  to  that  of  Eng- 
land. And  thus  their  opposition  to  Episcopacy,  and 
consequently  their  unfitness  to  derive  benefit  from  it, 
would  be  increased,  and  the  period  of  their  receiving 
it,  which  is,  as  we  trust,  after  all,  not  very  remote, 
would  be  postponed.  This  jealousy  would  be  felt  in 
an  equal,  if  not  greater  degree,  by  the  Roman  Ca- 
tholics ;  though  of  them  indeed  we  need  not  make 
the  same  account,  as  we  can  have  no  reasonable 
hope  of  their  ever  meeting  us  even  half  way  in  inter- 
communion. Yet  they  too  may  be  affected,  though 
not  perhaps  immediately,  by  the  conduct  of  their 
Protestant  countrymen.  For  their  reformation  might 
be  proportionably  deferred  by  any  thing  which  would 
retard  a  joyful  and  ready  adoption  of  more  regular 
Church  government  on  the  part  of  the  German 
Protestants ;  as  we  have  already  remarked,  that  the 
abandonment  of  error  by  Protestants,  and  their  re- 
turn to  primitive  order,  is  more  likely  than  any- 


33 


thing  else,  to  win  over  German  Romanists  from  the 
abuses  of  Popery. 

Such  seem  to  be  some  of  the  objections  existing 
against  the  appointment  of  a  Clergyman  of  the  epis- 
copal order  to  oversee  the  clergy  and  the  congrega- 
tions of  our  Church  in  Germany.  Your  Lordship 
will  observe  that  they  are  to  a  certain  extent  counter- 
balanced by  advantages ;  and  that  in  themselves  they 
are,  so  to  speak,  provisorial,  and  depending  on  cir- 
cumstances, and  not  on  principles.  And  indeed  it 
is  probable  that  so  much  weight  would  not  have 
been  here  assigned  to  them,  were  it  not  for  the  hope 
that  the  time  is  not  very  distant,  when  an  increase 
to  the  number  of  our  Bishops  at  home,  will  enable 
episcopal  superintendence  to  be  extended  to  the 
stragglers  of  our  flock  abroad,  without  any  absolute 
necessity  for  the  residence  of  an  Anglican  Bishop  in 
foreign  lands,  beyond  the  colonies  and  dependencies 
of  England. 

It  seems  to  be  becoming  a  matter  of  general 
admission  among  members  of  our  Church,  that  the 
number  of  our  Bishops  requires  to  be  considerably 
increased,  and  that  the  appointment  of  Suffragans 
would  be  an  expedient  measure.  And  in  the  event 
of  any  such  alteration,  the  immense  and  daily  in- 
creasing diocese  of  London  will  be  among  the  first  to 
claim  this  aid.  And  it  might  come  properly  within 
the  province  of  such  a  Suffragan,  from  time  to  time,  to 
visit,  confirm,  and  settle  the  English  population  in 
different  countries  out  of  England,  which  had  no  local 

C 


34 


Bishops  set  over  them.  Provided  always,  that  the 
prolonged  peace  of  the  continent  admitted  of  such 
continued  colonization.  And  otherwise,  there  would 
be  still  less  occasion  for  the  residence  of  a  local  Bishop 
than  for  the  superintending  visits  of  a  Suffragan. 

It  would  seem  that  none  of  these  objections,  if 
indeed  their  validity  as  conclusive  objections  be  ad- 
mitted, apply  to  the  other  of  the  two  above  men- 
tioned alternatives,  viz.  the  superintendence  of  the 
Anglican  congregations  in  Germany  by  a  presbyter, 
who  should  possess  no  jurisdiction  beyond  one  dele- 
gated to  him  by  your  Lordship  as  your  commissary. 
Difficulties  it  may  be  apprehended  there  would  be, 
in  the  way  of  the  appointment  of  a  Bishop,  arising 
indeed  rather  from  circumstances  than  from  the  real 
rights  of  the  matter.  But  still,  in  the  face  of  these, 
it  may  be  that  the  other  alternative,  if  not  so  truly 
answering  to  the  wants  of  the  Church,  is  at  least 
more  practicable  and  simple. 

A  title  of  some  sort  the  episcopal  commissary 
ought  to  have.  And  that  of  Archdeacon  would  be  a 
sufficient  distinction  to  ensure  respect,  as  well  from 
the  clergy  and  laity  of  our  own  Church,  as  from  those 
of  other  communions :  while  at  the  same  time,  it  is 
one  which  might  without  difficulty  be  laid  aside,  did 
political  or  other  causes  interrupt  the  continuance 
of  English  congregations  in  Germany.  While  this 
appointment  could  not  cause  either  to  Protestants, 
or  to  Romanists,  any  reasonable  jealousy,  it  would 
inspire  them  with  additional  respect  for  the  principle 

7 


35 


of  good  order,  which  they  would  thus  see  carried  out 
into  the  more  remote  ramifications  of  our  Church. 
And  thus,  the  more  urgent  wants  of  the  Anglican 
congregations  would  be  supplied;  for  the  Arch- 
deacon would  be  in  constant  communication  with 
your  Lordship.  And  the  degree  of  authority  with 
which  he  would  be  invested,  might  be  most  benefi- 
cially exerted  in  keeping  up  decency  and  good  order 
in  the  congregations,  in  enquiring  into  the  previous 
character  of  the  chaplains,  and  watching  over  their 
conduct ;  in  communicating  with  the  local  authorities 
in  any  case  of  dispute  or  misunderstanding,  in  de- 
ciding upon  any  point  of  disagreement  between  the 
clergy  and  people,  and  in  preventing  any  unseemly 
collision  between  the  clergy  themselves.  In  short, 
to  return  to  the  painful  instance  already  cited,  it  is 
conceived  that  such  an  appointment  as  that  now 
suggested,  might  operate  beneficially  in  preventing 
the  recurrence  of  any  such  discreditable  scene  as  that 
which  was  displayed  last  summer  at  Carlsbad. 

If  it  is  admitted  that  this  appointment  would  be 
beneficial,  there  could  be  no  insuperable  difficulty  in 
carrying  it  into  effect.  Its  expense  need  not  be  great, 
even  were  that  a  right  consideration  in  a  matter  of  ac- 
knowledged spiritual  usefulness,  admitting  the  present 
to  be  such  a  case.  Indeed,  economy  might  be  one 
reason,  although  a  very  inadequate  one,  why  an  Arch- 
deacon should  be  preferred  in  Germany  to  a  Bishop. 
A  few  hundreds  per  annum  would  suffice,  in  order  to 

c2 


36 


defray  his  frequent  correspondence,  and  his  occasional 
visits  to  the  different  English  congregations.  It  is 
not  even  apprehended  that  his  constant  residence 
on  the  continent  would  be  necessary.  He  might 
make  his  visitations  once  in  the  year,  or  once  in  two 
years,  as  occasion  required ;  and  travelling  is  now  so 
rapid  and  easy,  that  on  any  particular  business  he 
might  make  a  journey  on  purpose. 

It  is  also  deserving  of  consideration,  that  the  ap- 
pointment of  an  Archdeacon  would  not  require  a 
previous  application  to  parliament.  It  is  conceived 
that  nothing  more  is  requisite,  than  that  your  Lord- 
ship should  appoint  a  commissary  to  visit  the  foreign 
stations,  and  that  all  other  Bishops  should  agree  not  to 
license  or  institute  to  curacies  or  livings  within  their 
respective  dioceses,  clergymen  who  have  held  the 
position  of  continental  chaplains,  without  a  testimo- 
nial countersigned  by  the  commissary. 

In  conclusion,  it  is  humbly  and  most  respectfully 
entreated,  that  some  consideration  should  be  given 
to  the  three  important  points  which  have  been  ad- 
verted to  in  this  letter. 

1st.  The  necessity  that  every  clergyman  who 
ministers  to  his  countrymen  in  Germany,  or  indeed 
in  any  part  of  the  continent  of  Europe,  should  be 
furnished  with  an  express  testimonial  or  licence,  from 
the  Bishop  of  his  own  diocese,  or  from  the  Bishop 
in  whose  diocese  he  has  been  most  recently 
settled. 


37 


2d.  That  in  those  parts  of  the  continent  of 
Europe  which  have  not  already  been  placed  under 
the  jurisdiction  of  an  Anglican  Bishop,  (as  has  re- 
cently been  effected  in  Gibraltar,  Malta,  and  the 
shores  of  the  Mediterranean,)  no  clergyman  shall 
take  it  upon  him  to  minister  publicly  to  the  English 
as  their  chaplain,  to  open  a  subscription  book,  or  to 
collect  pecuniary  remuneration  for  his  services,  with- 
out an  express  licence  to  do  so  from  the  Bishop  of 
London. 

3d.  That  some  ecclesiastical  superintendence  should 
be  appointed  to  watch  over  the  spiritual  interests  of 
Anglicans  in  certain  districts  of  the  continent  of 
Europe,  where  they  are  numerously  settled,  as,  for 
instance,  in  Germany ;  and  that  the  proposed  super- 
intendent should  be  invested  with  power  to  act  as 
the  Bishop  of  London's  commissary,  and  that  he 
should  have  the  title  of  Archdeacon. 

It  now  remains  for  me  to  express  the  humble  and 
earnest  hope,  that  your  Lordship  will  pardon  me 
for  having  presumed  to  address  you  on  this  subject. 
My  long  and  intimate  acquaintance  with  the  Ger- 
mans, and  my  heart's  cherished  desire  that  they  may 
one  day  be  brought  within  the  influence  of  our  aposto- 
lical Church,  will,  I  hope,  in  some  measure,  plead  my 
excuse.  For  it  is  certain  that  our  success  or  failure 
in  the  great  mission  which  the  providence  of  God 
seems  to  have  assigned  to  us,  in  relation  to  this 


38 


people,  will  be  very  materially  affected  by  the  degree 
in  which  the  system  of  our  Church  is  brought  before 
their  eyes  as  one  of  piety,  dignity,  and  good  order. 

"Jl  have  the  honour  to  be, 

My  Lord, 

With  the  most  sincere  respect, 
Your  Lordship's  obedient  and  obliged  Servant, 

JOHN  HAMILTON  GRAY. 

BOLSOVER  CASTLE, 
Christmas-Eve,  1842. 


THE   END. 


GILBERT  &  RIVINGTON,  Printers^  St.  John's  Square,  London. 


14  DAY  USE 

RETURN  TO  DESK  FROM  WHICH  BORROWED 

LOAN  DEPT. 

This  book  is  due  on  the  last  date  stamped  below,  or 

on  the  date  to  which  renewed. 
Renewed  books  are  subject  to  immediate  recall. 


MAR  20 


...CAN  DEI 


LOAN 


[OV  13  1971 


LD  21A-60m-7,'66 
(G4427slO)476B 


1  0  7 1997 

REC.MOFFITT    «a 


General  Library 

University  of  California 

Berkeley 


871786 


- 


THE  UNIVERSITY  OF  CALIFORNIA  LIBRARY 


-  ,  - s 


i^ 


*  ,-v~^  .-  -• "  -  ^nKk^YJ^r 


faftfbf.