msj& ,%^
STORKS
'ERSWY OP
PREFACE.
THE plan of this work is to portray the life of Emery A.
Storrs, during a remarkable era in the history of this
country, not so much by biographical data as by the interwoven
illustrations of the brilliancy and strength of his rare intellectual
endowments.
From his early manhood, almost, Mr. Storrs figured conspic
uously at the bar and in American politics. "The graces of ora
tory" were lavishly granted him, and the proud results of nat
ural intellectual gifts and intense habits of research and labor were
early achieved. His stinging ridicule, his humor, his forensic and
platform eloquence, tempered by wondrous magnetism and a
classic style of thought and speech, made his utterances during
the last quarter of a century always sought for by the press and
repeated by readers and listeners.
The aim, accordingly, in the preparation of the following pages
has been to delight again the public, his living admirers, by string
ing upon the thread of biography the jewels of his singularly
M902517
11 PREFACE.
fertile brain ; and, perchance, to perpetuate for an unborn public
much worthy a place of honor upon the shelves of every lover
of a luminous intellect.
The thanks of the editor are especially due in the prosecution
and completion of this labor of admiration to Mr. William J.
Guest, who for many years was the trusted stenographer of Mr.
Storrs, without whose personal familiarity with many of the im
portant events described — as, for instance, the great Babcock trial
— the work could scarcely have been accomplished.
I. E. A.
Chicago, 1886.
a (Meeting of the (Members 0f the
!{olilcn in the
(llnitecl |Jtatcs ©istrict
©hicacjo, September 18, J885,
*Hr
yn\ ^s~ w^-
of s;iid Court, iircsitliiui,
the fallau-ing
pon lip omisinn of lip
nl ii
n la t;nbtiriug
©anris in
jbtttgj Ip mamj-sibab anb urrsalilt rfyarat-
taijt utfpdff gaua {pn nalianaf prantinanoj al Up
lmij, npan Up raslrnm, anb npan Up p{alFarmt
l^ii| ba$ir^ la giu^ arprassian la l^ai^ aslimal^ af{
a$ a lauiipr, laauing la allprs la
{;}$ Iabar$ in Ib uiibar fialb aF nnfefit
6 & i j J[
in tu^it^ {p liart a tan$pitnan$ parh
j| an abuatalt ^a attnpi^b l^a Franl rnnfe
al fo Jtmaritan Bar. ¥nan Jfet Faun-
A i i »i 6 •» i
t antannling
balian aFj a naliut lalrnl Far
la g&tins ii$0IFt ^0 abbib 1^ dbmmtb ^ a uaritb
anb trbn$ia^ tnllnrt. n rapian$ bi:liant a nrnnarij
$a$nr^b afi l^al ^ $n$it ^iarb arj nabt
anb intisii^ tuilt a $0imr^ Jagit^ a raar-
uilan$ F;arlilili| in anatbal^ anb iHn$iraliant anb
a paumr af[ p$r$na$ian p0r^ap$ un$nrpa$$ab
mnang all ^i$ ^anlmnparnrits.
1pm tu^ tlmtb^b al$a man^ alj
an
b
_ _
uiarb$ in Ifp
tjanrbans present?, 1^0 rftganl bi^lia
anb lip uianbtrFnl ina$ltrt| aF pnnj ^nglis^ ui^i
btj Pr$kin^ in ^i$ b$l barjs*
s
t tont in a maiibb bagmt lip
bannlb$$ tanragfj $0 of[ton $Ipum itj Pr$kin^
in assorting tip righto 0{j a ditni again$l a
|o$JH^ t0nrlt uij in brfanbing an nnpopnlaij
10 |ab Ifjat nn$ui^ruing bmnlion to |i$ t^icnl
ap$ a(farb$ tip Hnnt ir-
al i^ Pngli$! tajjt anb ui^it^ ma$ $a uirll
in
in prepntfon, J|a nirutin$t
cS) lr^«9
£~OJ /5tT ^ (
n
in
unit
rontbin^b in
t utp^ ^HinilmiT utii^ tip gnnl nb-
Iptb
npmt nti mabil in! |i$ atun. ^$ n$abib nu
J[nb tu|i^ tu^ $atu in lji$ t^$t $fforl$ ai 1^0 fotij jfl
^J % d^i
tuani 0f[ a Bfibtj nam^ tttij $liti
; an inbi$^ribtH^ Wmtbing off mil anb
iui$bomr of {jantt| anh af par$na$iant of patips
^.X.^"
anb uF ituterihfy ui^it^ uim4^ all ffis nwn, bistinqt
inbiuibnalt inimitably at 0nq t^a abmirati^n anb I
t^0 bf$paiij o| aH 111^0 ^arb ^im, anb as biF-
sag tnn b a gitai
n gaah feur 1 Jin $
®| trnt. ^
L-Od i
iua$ a grant
mo$t Jptrh-fongfji Hligalmnt
ntatj au^ ailribnisb l^f i|$$nH to
inspirntion 0f ganin$t fern flf i$ ni$$ilb$ af
Ijim in Hp pr0parali0n anb t^nbntl 01} a
0tj 10 fa 0jtp0$0b 10 Ijtnt in Ipn0ralifij t0ntenli0nt
knttut faltetj Ifpm Hp listening tputbs dp fpmg
& tnlrant^b nn0n
t m m0$l
to$ nl Up
uiottlb ant; rsliunilij of;
fa
jtra-
10
in
nt
tgljl, xui
u^ {p$ fa$l
0r
10 lip
i «««?
fomt uttiunrl|i| a\
*<T YY IY "
I" "ttt't'TT^ "titTT TTtf^
i v^uuiiuii^ mv v^**i|v^Ut iUiiU uU lUI? -
B^O^B ' t * 6 >
[}$ arb^nl nalnr^ l^al 0uar^ man dprgab uii
Hp
jt attb Ij0ut0u0ti $lr0ng
gnillt i$ ^nlilbb 10 faitj Irial anb |0n0rati^ bi-
in att0rbant^ tuil| Hp latu 0^[ 1^0 Ianbt
all 0ntj faa$teb Hfatjln 01} Hp tilb0n t$ linl
(\ '^ 35 ' j^^. y 3 *-
a r0p0 0i{ $anb. JUKIJ Ip gr0al
in $0 mant| uiat|$t ^0
nub bttdbk IJram unjust qrilimm in Ifyis rrgarb
tii| Ifyasij utfya $am^lhua$ suaarab nl uifynl ifptj
Ifya " uu$t;ru|wlau$u*j$$ a^ fyt$ nbuatna|/*
ua tjrtlmsiu auat] tmi$ab fyim Id $iuaru^ Far
mam^ul F^am {^a hbdjnrga 0^ pr0F^$$i0uaI
t aij la giuij la$$ t^nu l^a Jjull man$urt aF
$aruit^ hua ^ram bui^aij la qlbni*-*--*
nba i$ ia B^ rautiubarfb aF am;
^amrub
ua au^
mar^ lira!a$$ zaul la turn fyb uiijbitlt ua
uitjlari|
laug
utn$ auar, tlaub^b unify Ifya tjatafe^liau
mamts tu
nub la
il$
la
la uristeb ^ilfyar ^aurt aij juri|t tul Irisb
unify nbalul^ F{iiirui$$ upau il$ tmjri
attu
jtiijb
u $
fy
aF0$$iaut nub ua aua fyn$ Bs$u fyanijb la tfynrga
uupraFa$$iaun! ^aubutt aij malfyab$.
t$
$uuuuau$ ^nmi la fyiin nlma$l in Ifyi
^aurl iu uifyitfy $ ^a^uau uaq
fyanijb, jlummauab uiilfyaul n
runruiug Fram Ifya kr aF fyumnu la Ifynl
TABLE OF CONTENTS.
CHAPTER I.
ORIGIN AND EARLY EXPERIENCES.
The Storrs Family — A Good New England Stock — His Mother a Not
able Woman— Birth of Emery A. Storrs— The Storrs and Garfield Fami
lies of Worcester, New York — A Practical Idea of Education-
Literary Leanings in Childhood — The Boy Editor — A Hard Stu
dent and Versatile Scholar — Specimens of his Earliest Compositions —
His First Lecture — Admitted to the Bar — Courtship and Marriage, . . 2
CHAPTER II.
THREE EARLY LITERARY GEMS.
Essay on "Modern Charity" — Experiment in Sermon Writing — The
Parable of the Ewe Lamb — Lecture on "Idealists and Utilitarians," 4
CHAPTER III.
WRITING FOR THE PRESS, 1854—1857.
Literary Contributions to the Buffalo Newspapers— American Maga
zines Thirty Years Ago — Southern Literature — An Historical Curiosity
Review of the Life of General Cass— Benton's "Thirty Years in the
United States Senate "—A Prophetic Forecast of the Outcome of the
Slavery Agitation, 63
CHAPTER IV.
THE KANSAS TROUBLES, 1858.
Mr. Storrs' First Political Speech—An Effort Worthy of His Best Days
xi
Xil CONTESTS.
— The Kansas Question Discussed — President Buchanan's Message —
The Drift of the Democracy— Truckling to the South — Mr. Storrs
Predicts How it will End, 86
CHAPTER V.
HUMILIATION AND A NEW LIFE.
His Last Years at Buffalo — A Stumble — Begins to Rise at Chicago —
Early Professional Struggles — A Secret Side — Writing Editorials for
the Chicago Press — " English Philanthrophy " — " A Chapter on Board
ing-Houses, " 103
CHAPTER VI.
PROFESSIONAL DILIGENCE.
The Hazard Case — Outline of A Model Jury Speech — His Early
Briefs, a Monument of Professional Industry — Some of His Work, . 128
CHAPTER VII.
OUR NATIONAL FUTURE.
Patriotic Address on the Fourth of July, 1864— Our Nation the Em
bodied Spirit of the Great Men who have Contributed to its Glory in
the Past — A Nation Saved at such a Cost of Blood and Treasure
will Think More Highly of its Privileges — Politics will be Elevated into
Patriotic Statesmanship — Our National Literature and Habits of
Thought, 141
I
CHAPTER VIII.
LINCOLN'S EMANCIPATION PROCLAMATION.
Speech at Sycamore, Illinois, on President Lincoln's Emancipation Proc
lamation—The President's Right to Issue it under the Constitution
and the Law of Nations— Suspension of the \Vrit of Habeas Corpus-
Arrest of Mr. Vallandigham — The Negro as a Soldier : . . 156
CHAPTER IX.
A CELEBRATED LIBEL CASE.
A Soldier's Widow Complains of Oppression — The Facts Published in
the Chicago "Times"— The "Times" Sued for Libel— Mr. Storrs'
Argument for the Defense — A Terrible Flagellation of the Plaintiff and
CONTENTS. Xlll
His Witnesses — The Case Illustrated by Scripture Parables — Appeal to
the Humanity of the Jury — The Suit Withdrawn at the Close of Mr.
Storrs' Speech 173
CHAPTER X.
JOHNSON'S RECONSTRUCTION POLICY.
Mr. Storrs at Ottawa, Illinois, 1866 — Johnson's Doctrine that the
Rebels Forfeited no Political Rights — An Exhaustive Reply — John
son's Record Reviewed, 196
CHAPTER XI.
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 868.
Mr. Storrs Electrifies the People of Maine — A Triumphal Progress — His
Efforts in His Own State — The Democratic Party Unchanged and
Unreformed — The Reconstruction Measures — The Fourteenth Amend
ment — "Dead Issues" — What the Republican Party Has Achieved —
Pendleton's Repudiation Plan — The Record of Horatio Seymour, . . 209
CHAPTER XII.
'AN ESTABLISHED REPUTATION.
A Famous Insurance Case — Its History — A New Way to Look at Cor
porations and Individuals — A Masterly Argument — Capturing the Court,
but not the Jury — Standing as an Insurance Lawyer 213
CHAPTER XIII.
POETICAL ORATORY AND COLD REASONING.
What a Soldier's Monument Proclaims — An Inspiration — An Address
of Beauty — Sanctity of Contracts — Franchise Property Not to be
Taken Without Process of Law — The State of Illinois and the Illinois
Central — A Discussion Before Governor Palmer 221
CHAPTER XIV.
THE FREE TRADE QUESTION, 1870.
Mr. Storrs' Lucid Exposition of Economic Questions — The High Tariff
a War Measure — A Needless Surplus in the Treasury — A General
Demand for a Reduction of Taxation — The " Protection of American
Industry "—The Farmers Need to be Protected Against Protection—
XIV CONTENTS.
"The Greatest Good of the Greatest Number," a Fundamental Prin
ciple of American Politics — Protection and Slavery — One Kind of In
dustry Compelled to Pay Tribute to Another — Protection Diminishes
Revenue — A System of Legalized Plunder of the Consumer — Diversi
fying Labor by Legislation — "The Pauper Labor of Europe," .... 335
CHAPTER XV.
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1872.
The "Liberal" Republicans and the Cincinnati Convention — State Con
vention of Illinois — Mr. Storrs, at Springfield, Reviews the Situation —
Civil Service Reform— Revenue Reform— The Tariff— The National
Debt — Resumption of Specie Payments — The Philadelphia Convention
— Speech at Ottawa, Illinois — The Cradle of the Republican Party—
Grant's Record — Trenchant Review of the Record of Horace Greeley
— The One Term Principle — Speech at Freeport, Illinois — Comparison
of the "Liberal" and Republican Platforms — Greeley and Lincoln —
Speech at Dixon, Illinois — The Congregation Dismiss the Choir —
Greeley 's Famous Plan for the Resumption of Specie Payments — The
Ku-Klux and Enforcement Bills — Speech at Indianapolis — Scripture
Illustrations — The Conversion of Saul — Parable of the Unjust Servant
— Speeches at Reading, Pa., and Other Eastern Cities, 247
CHAPTER XVI.
PROFESSIONAL PROSPERITY.
His Professional Work from the Fire of 1871 to 1875 — Prominence in
Great Cases — "Hell as a Military Necessity" — The Congressional
Election of 1874 — Consolidation of the Illinois Supreme Court, . . - 293
CHAPTER XVII.
A DECORATION DAY ADDRESS.
The Honored Union Dead — What They Fought and Died for — Tribute
to Charles Sumncr, ^oj
CHAPTER XVIII.
LECTURES ON THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION.
Two Lectures to the Students of the Chicago Law College — The Four
Great Documents which form the Basis of the Modern English Con
stitution — " Bailiffs and Constables that Know the Law and Mean to
Observe it" — How Magna Charta would work in Chicago — History of
the Crown and Parliament, 310
CONTENTS. XV
CHAPTER XIX.
MUNICIPAL REFORM.
Organization of the "Citizens' Association of Chicago" — Mr. Storrs
Drafts its Constitution — Its Objects — Suggestion of Subjects for Legisla
tion — Advocates Reorganization of the City Government under the Gen
eral Law — Changing Voting Places from Saloons to Other Quarters — The
Proposition to Divide the Common Council into Two Houses — City
Election on the Charter Question — The Citizens' Association and Mr.
Storrs Part Company — Mr. Storrs in Contempt of Court for a Legal
Opinion — His Argument in Defense of Himself and Hi's Associates —
The " Fanning Mill Orator," 315
CHAPTER XX.
PRACTICAL TEMPERANCE LEGISLATION.
The Drinking Habit Not Uncommon Among the Early Settlers of Chi
cago — A Change after the Fire of 1871 — Mr. Storrs Becomes an
Abstainer and an Apostle — What the "Times" Thought of His Con
version — Two Temperance Speeches — Correspondence on Prohibition
— One of the Founders of the Citizens' League for the Suppression
of the sale of Liquor to Minors — Apostrophe to Water, 333
CHAPTER XXI.
THE ST. LOUIS WHISKY RING.
History of the St. Louis Whisky Ring— Its Method of Operatibns— The
Prosecutions Conducted for Political Ends — Immunity Given to the
Worst Offenders — An Attempt to Cast Discredit upon President Grant
by Indicting his Private Secretary — Prosecutions run in the Interest of
Secretary Bristow's Presidential Aspirations — General Babcock's
Career — The Mephistophelian Arts of Joyce and Mac Donald in Corres
ponding with Him — Popular Prejudice Against Babcock — Attitude of
President Grant — His Letter to Mrs. Babcock, .... 3^6
CHAPTER XXII.
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK.
I.
THE PROSECUTION.
Mr. Storrs Retained as Leading Counsel for the Defense of General
Babcock — Opening Speech of District Attorney Dyer — Con. Megrue's
Evidence Ruled Out — Mr. Storrs' Cross-Examination of the Govern-
2
XVI CONTEXTS.
ment Witnesses — Where the Ring Got their Information of the Coming
of Revenue Agents — A Conscientious Gauger — Testimony of Abijah
M. Everest — Joyce's Hocus Pocus with the Two #500 Bills — Testi
mony of the Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner of Internal
Revenue — Argument on Admission of Telegrams — "Chops and To
mato Sauce" — How Colonel Broadhead Accentuated a Telegram —
Joyce's Declarations Ruled Out — Testimony of Revenue Agent
Brooks — The Government Case Closed, 369
II.
THE DEFENSE.
Opening Speech of Ex-Attorney-General Williams — What Joyce's "Mum"
Dispatch Meant — Mr. Williams' Personal Experience of the Cares of
Office — Splendid Array of Witnesses to General Babcock's Character
— Testimony of Supervisor Tutton— jWhy the Order Transferring the
Supervisors was Revoked — Disingenuous Course of the Prosecution.
— The District Attorney Walks into a Trap of his own Construction- —
Secretary Bristow Directly Responsible for the Revocation of the
Order — Joyce's Correspondence — Revenue Agent Hoag the Source of
the Ring's Information — Deposition of the President — Judge Porter's
Motion for a Direction to Acquit Overruled — Colonel Broadhead' s
Argument for the Prosecution — The "Sylph" Telegram — f losing Ar
gument of Mr. Storrs for the Defense — Judge Porter Follows — Gen
eral Dyer's Reply — Judge Dillon's Charge to the Jury 407
« >
III.
THE VERDICT.
The Jury Find the Defendant Not Guilty — An Ovation to General Bab-
cock and Mr. Storrs — The General Serenaded — Speech of Mr. Storrs
— Senator Howe's Opinion of the Case, . . 453
CHAPTER XXIII.
THE CHICAGO WHISKY RING.
History of the Chicago Seizures — The "First Batch" Inform on the
"Second Batch," and are granted Absolute Immunity — Jacob Rehm,
the Organizer of the Chicago Ring, Becomes the Leading Informer —
Indictment of the District Attorney, and Other Government Officials,
on His Information — Public Astonishment — Discreditable Course of the
Government Attorneys — Trial of Rush and Pahlman — Mr. Storrs'
Argument for the Defense — Crushing Denunciation of the Government
Witnesses— Government Counsel also Come in for a Flaying — Al-
CONTENTS. XV11
tercation Between Mr. Storrs and the Court — Chicago " Sewer Poli
ticians " — Trial of Supervisor Munn — The Jury Refuse to Believe Rehm,
and Munn is Acquitted — Dismissal of the other Indictments — Letter of
Mr. Storrs to President Grant — Comments of the Local Press — Efforts to
Implicate Senator Logan, Congressman Farwell, and the Chicago
Postmaster — Mr. Storrs Appointed Special District Attorney — Brings
Suit Against Rehm for Civil Penalties — The Suit Dismissed — Judge
Drummond's Opinion, 457
CHAPTER XXIV.
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1876.
Ratification Meeting in Chicago — Colorless Candidates — Speech at
Aurora, Illinois — The Records of the Republican and Democratic
Parties Compared — The St Louis Platform — Financial Administration
of the Republican Party — Reduction of Taxation and Expenses —
Tilden, The Friend of Tweed — Speech at Detroit — Review of the
Democratic Platform, and Tilden's Record — Speech at Freeport, Illi
nois — Record of the Democracy — Enforcing the Constitutional Amend
ments — A New Application of the Parable of the Prodigal Son —
Where Tilden was During the War, 489
CHAPTER XXV.
"CONSTRUCTIVE CONTEMPT*' AND "TRIAL BY JURY."
The case of Wilbur F. Storey for Criticising a Grand Jury — Mr.
Storrs' Views upon the Subject — History of the Law of Constructive
Contempt — Illustration of Power of Lucid yet Comprehensive In
terpretation of a Law Question — Influencing a Judge — A Lecture
on the Origin, History, and Merits of the Jury System 532
CHAPTER XXVI.
SOME GREAT CRIMINAL TRIALS.
Trial of Rudolphus K. Turner for Forgery— Contents of a Forger's
Trunk — Trial of Five County Commissioners for Fraud — How a
Young Clerk kept Check on his Employer— An Arson Case gotten up
by an Insurance Company turns out to be a Malicious Prosecution,
with Blackmailing Features 54o
XVI 11 CONTENTS.
CHAPTER XXVII.
TRIAL OF ALEXANDER SULLIVAN.
The Case as Viewed by Mr. Storrs — The True Presentation — The Evi
dence — Forced Warfare of Religions — The Trial Scenes — The Acquit
tal of the Accused — Subsequent History '548
CHAPTER XXVIII.
THE GREAT ANN ARBOR CASE.
History of the Douglas- Rose Trouble — A Plot Against an Old Soldier
—Divides First a School, then a State — The Trial in the Courts— Mr.
Storrs' Great Argument — A Scientific Fraud — The Result 566
CHAPTER XXIX.
THE LAW OF LIBEL.
The Great Fire of Chicago — Manuscript of a Valuable Treatise De
stroyed — Lecture Based on the Recollections of a Lost Book — His
tory of the Triumph of Juries over Judges — Some Famous Libel
Instances — Multum in parvo 581
CHAPTER XXX.
RESUMPTION OF SPECIE PAYMENTS.
Mr. Storrs at Sycamore, Illinois, 1878 — Exploded Theories of Finance
— Does Inflation Inflate — History of the Paper Currency Inflation
in the Past — The Panic of 1873 not Brought About by a Lack of
Currency — Proposition to " Restore Confidence " by an Act of Con
gress — Fiat Money a Project of Repudiation — The Philosopher's
Stone a Rational Scheme Compared with it — Mr. Gladstone's
Tribute to the Achievements of America in Paying her Debt .... 588
CHAPTER XXXI.
VARIOUS PUBLIC UTTERANCES.
Letter to Senator M'Pherson on the Silver Bill — American Commerce,
1878 — The Growth of Chicago— The Purity of the Bench and Bar
CONTENTS. XIX
— The Blodgett Investigation — Lawyers as Legislators — Grant for a
Third Term — Mr. Storrs' Opinion of President Hayes — A Bric-a-
brac Cabinet 604
CHAPTER XXXII.
CHICAGO CITY MISGOVERNMENT.
The Chicago Municipal Election of 1879 — Mr Storrs, at a Mass-Meet
ing of Republicans in Farwell Hall, Opposes Handing over the City
Government to the Democrats — Comparison of Republican and
Democratic Municipal Government — The Election Laws which the
Brigadiers in Congress Sought to Repeal — Carter Harrison Elected 614
CHAPTER XXXIII.
NATIONAL POLITICS IN 1879.
A Political Tour in New York State — At Syracuse — Conservative and
Radical Republicanism — Democratic Hypocrisy — Attempt to Repeal
the Election Laws — The Murder of Chisholm and Dixon — Southern
Idea of <; Conciliation " — Honest Government, National Prosperity,
and no Sectionalism — Sudden Death of Hon. Zachariah Chandler . 622
CHAPTER XXXIV.
EMOTIONAL INSANITY IN MURDER CASES.
Trial of Peter Stevens at Chicago for the Murder of his Wife— A Sad
Story of Conjugal Misery — The Temptations of a Great City — The
Plea of Emotional Insanity Set Up for the Defence — Mr. Storrs
Makes a Powerful Argument for the Defendant — The Verdict . . . 633
CHAPTER XXXV.
«
AN ADDRESS TO DOCTORS.
A Serio-comic Address to a Graduating Class — Early Recollections of
Home-made Remedies — What He Knew About Doctors — Chicago
the Greatest Medical Centre and Distributer of Doctors and Diseases
— The Field of Medical Jurisprudence — Medical Experts as Others
See Them — Insanity as a Defence in Criminal Cases 638
XX CONTENTS.
CHAPTER XXXVI.
RECEPTION OF GENERAL GRANT IN CHICAGO.
General Grant's Return from his Tour Around the World — Reception
in Chicago — The Union Veteran Club — Welcomed by Mr. Storrs —
National Rights Substituted for State Rights — Political Equality of
All Citizens must be Secured, by Force if Necessary— Justice Better
than Peace — The Obligations of the Government must be Fulfilled
— The Prodigal Son in a New Dress — Banquet of the Army of
Tennessee — Mr. Storrs Speaks for the Patriotic People Who Fed and
Clothed Our Armies — Calumet Club Reception . . 645
CHAPTER XXXVII.
A TRIP TO DEADWOOD.
Proposition to Nominate Mr. Storrs for Congress — Comment of the
Press — Letter to Hon. William Aldrich — A Professional Trip to the
Black Hills — Discomforts of the Journey — His Impressions of Dead-
wood — Trial of County Officials for Embezzlement — Mining Inter
ests of Dakota — Invitations to Take Part in the Campaign 654
CHAPTER XXXVIII.
DISRUPTION OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY IN ILLINOIS.
Preparations for the Campaign of 1880 — Organization of the Friends
of General Grant — Letter of Mr. Storrs on " Our Southern Fellow
Citizens" — Correspondence with Hon. E. B. Washburne — Corre
spondence on the Political Situation — Mr. Storrs' Tribute to the Old
Commander — "The Independent Scratcher " and his Record — De
fection of Mr. Washburne — Two Rival County Conventions Held in
Chicago — Mr. Farwell's Reliance on Lungs and Vertebrae — The Illi
nois State Convention — A Faction Fight — Argument of Mr. Storrs
on Behalf of the Grant Delegates — Mr. Washburne Disclaims Dis
loyalty to General Grant — Struggle in the National Convention . . 660
CHAPTER XXXIX.
THE CAMPAIGN OF l88o.
Preparations for the Campaign — Organization of the Friends of Gen-
CONTENTS. XXI
eral Grant — Mr. Storrs Addresses the Irish Republicans of Chicago
—Why Irishmen Should Vote the Republican Ticket — Why They
Should Abandon the Democracy — The Cook County Convention
— The State Convention at Springfield — Mass Meeting in Central
Music Hall — The National Convention — Opposition Delegates —
Mr. Storrs' Argument for the Enforcement of the Unit Rule — His
Great Speech in the Convention — Defection of Mr. Washburne —
The " Old Guard"— Mr. Storrs at Burlington, Iowa — Speech in
Philadelphia — The Democratic Platform Reviewed — What its Suc
cess Would Mean — Its Financial Heresies — Mr. Storrs Addresses
the Colored Republicans of Chicago — At Oakland, California — At
Denver, Colorado — Mr. Storrs Stumps the State of Ohio — Great
Speech at Cleveland — At the Cooper Institute, New York — Articles
in the North American Review 683
CHAPTER XL.
THREE CELEBRATED MURDER TRIALS.
The Cochrane Case — The Wisconsin Law as to the Plea of Insanity —
The Ransom Case — The Illinois Law of Justifiable Homicide, and
the Doctrine of Self-defence — The Dunn Case — Patent Instruc
tions 704
CHAPTER XLI.
HISTORICAL CHICAGO.
Lecture on Behalf of the Historical Society — An Effort of Lasting In
terest — The Heart of a Great Empire — Chicago's Famous Historic
Wigwam — The Greatest Loss Suffered in the Great Fire of 1871 —
The Past, the Present, and Mr. Storrs' Ideas of the Garden City —
Facts and Fancies 725
CHAPTER XLII.
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1884.
Scene at the Closing of the Chicago Republican Convention — An
Oratorical Achievement — An Eloquent Speech Inspired by a Tumult
XXII CONTENTS.
— Work Elsewhere During a Campaign of Five Months — Bris
tling Wit at Boston, in Tremont Temple — Defence of the Riffraff
of the West — Our Nation's Shame — The Tariff Question Again —
Records of two Rival Political Organizations — Defeat of his Party,
but Faith in the Future 73Q
Ik
CHAPTER XLIII.
LEGALITY OF "TRIAL BY INFORMATION."
Mr. Storrs' Last Case — The Election Fraud in the i8th Ward of Chi
cago — Joseph C. Mackin and Others Tried by Information, Instead
of on Indictment — Mr. Storrs Moves for a Writ of Error — The Su
preme Court of the United States After his Death Sustains his
Points — A Posthumous Victory 761
CHAPTER XLIV.
THREE MONTHS IN EUROPE.
Rosy Descriptions of Experiences Abroad — Model Letters from a
Traveler — Impressions of Liverpool, London, Edinburgh, and
other Points of Interest — Features of Foreign Character not Usually
Noticed — A Bit of Business with Pleasure 781
CHAPTER XLV.
THE CONCLUSION.
Some Characteristics of Mr. Storrs' Wit — Illustrations of Repartee —
His Style of Oratory — Contrasted With Burke — A Dramatic In
cident — Last Scenes and Death at Ottawa — The End of All Mortal . 794
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS.
EMERY A. STORKS (Steel) . Frontispiece.
PAGE
FAC-SIMILE STORRS MEMORIAL OF THE CHICAGO BAR (Illuminated) 3
EARLY HOME OF EMERY A. STORRS . . . . ^ . . 35
FAC-SIMILE LETTER OF JAMES A. GARFIELD . . . 689
FAC-SIMILE LETTER OF CHESTER A. ARTHUR .... 739
FAC-SIMILE LETTER OF JAMES G. ELAINE . . . . 753
FAC-SIMILE LETTER OF ULYSSES S. GRANT .... 780
FAC-SIMILE MEMORIAL OF THE CITIZENS' LEAGUE OF CHICAGO 80 1
(xxiii)
CHAPTER I.
ORIGIN AND EARLY EXPERIENCES.
•
THE STORKS FAMILY— A GOOD NEW ENGLAND STOCK— HIS MOTHER A NOTA
BLE WOMAN — BIRTH OF EMERY A. STORRS — THE STORRS AND GARFIELD
FAMILIES OF WORCESTER, X. Y. — A PRACTICAL FATHER'S IDEA OF EDUCA
TION — LITERARY LEANINGS IN CHILDHOOD — THE BOY EDITOR — A HARD
STUDENT AND VERSATILE SCHOLAR — SPECIMENS OF HIS EARLIEST COMPO
SITIONS—HIS FIRST LECTURE— ADMITTED TO THE BAR— COURTSHIP AND
MARRIAGE.
THE life of Emery A. Storrs may be epitomized as that of
a singularly gifted public, private citizen. Humble in
his birth, he was yet of an excellent origin ; physically ever far
from robust, he was mentally something giant-like ; untutored by
college training, his style, in thought and speech, was classical ;
untitled by school, by people, or by rulers — never an occupant
of the most undignified office — he was an aristocrat on the ro?-
tra, a prince in politics, and a king in debate.
The little village of Hinsdale nestles to-day, as it did half a
century ago, close by the side of a gentle stream which benignly
flows through Cattaraugus County, New York. Mountains, not
frowning heights, but the hazy undulations characteristic of the
Northern Alleghenies, encircle protectingly the tiny community
as though to ward off from both orchards and people the winds
and troubles of the outside world. Here, on the twelfth day of
August, 1833^ was born Emery Alexander Storrs; in the same
house, in the same room, on the twelfth day of September, 1885,
to the father prostrated by illness, was imparted the news of the
sudden death of his distinguished son. Emery Alexander Storrs
25
26 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
came of a sterling stock. He was a direct lineal descendant of
Samuel Storrs, who came from Sutton, Nottinghamshire, Eng
land, as early as 1683, from whom a gifted race of orators has
sprung. Samuel Storrs was one of the twenty -two to whom was
granted the charter of organization of the town of Mansfield,
Connecticut, in May of 1/03, and, brave in several Indian battles
and a leader in council deliberations, this first of his family in
America was conspicuous in name among the archives of the New
England place ; and, here and there, stamped with punctilious
pride on the now yellowed records — in some instances, perhaps, most
unnecessarily and almost inconsistently stamped — appears the old
England crest of the Storrs family — an ermined banner bearing
the figure of a lion with uplifted right fore-leg, while above, on
the faces of office, rests a mailed arm, the clenched hand of
which holds a mitred cross. Prominently, thereafter, the name
figures in the Continental annals of both war and peace, and
almost invariably its wearers were men of more than ordi
nary ability and influence. By the marriage of the Rev. John
Storrs to the granddaughter of the Rev. Eleazer Williams*
was born early in September, 1763, a son, christened Richard
Salter Storrs, who graduated at Yale College twenty years later
and, settling as pastor of the Long Meadow, (Mass.) church,
made a brilliant reputation as a scholar and speaker, and thus
inaugurated a notable minsterial line perpetuated to-day in the
well-known Rev. Dr. Richard Salter Storrs, of Brooklyn, . N. Y.
It would be idle, in such a work as this, to attempt much con-
c^rning an ancestry many in number and prolific in excellent deeds,
but it may be well to paragraph briefly the name of Experience
Storrs, if only to illustrate what has so often transpired in the his
tory of families, that sons equally distinguished, may in a certain
sense occupy reversed positions. In the battle of Bunker Hill,
Colonel Experience Storrs commanded a company of Connecticut
men who fought heroically and who contained among their num
ber Elias Birchard, an ancestor of Ex-President R. B. Hayes.
It is related how Colonel Storrs was the chief spirit in a town
*Elder Williams died September I, 1742, leaving four daughters, the
eldest of whom, Eunice, married the Hon. Shubael Conant, and Eunice
Conant, their daughter, married Dr. Samuel Howe, and, on Dr. Howe's
demise, became the wife of the Rev. John Storrs, a grandson of Samuel.
ORIGIN AND EARLY EXPERIENCES. 2J
meeting held at Mansfield, September 13, 1774, to subscribe for his
embargoed countrymen in Boston ; how, as one of two delegates, he
proceeded later to Hartford and participated in the convention to
devise organized continental methods of aid for the same sufferers ;
how, in a great mass meeting of inhabitants, held in the town hall
on the tenth of October, 1 774, there was passed a remarkable decla
ration of freedom, voicing distinctly the coming Declaration of Inde
pendence, presented, in stirring tones, by Colonel Experience Storrs ;
how, in 1775, after the thrilling news of the battle of Lexington,
though it was night when the messenger reached the usually quiet
town, this same Colonel Storrs collected a band of ninety-three vol
unteers and marched off for Boston ; and how, all through the terri
ble years of war which ensued, this commander and his Mansfield
followers supported Washington.
Nathaniel Storrs married Harriet Denny, descendant of the Den-
nys of the Pilgrim stock, and removed from Mansfield to Worcester,
Otsego County, New York. Their son, Thomas D. Storrs, was the
father of the Honorable Alexander Storrs, the father of Emery A.
Storrs. Thomas D. Storrs married Catharine Campbell, a daughter
of one Alexander Campbell who was a full-blooded descendant of
the celebrated Scotch family of that name, and in this way came that
"tincture of Scotch sweet strength" of which the late Mr. Storrs
made laughing boast. Alexander Storrs, the father of Emery A.
Storrs, was nineteen years of age, when, in 1827, his parents removed
from Worcester, the place of his birth, to Cattaraugiis County,
New York, where he has continuously resided since that date, his
present home, erected in 1831 precisely as it now stands, being one
of the first houses in that quaint little village of Hinsdale. To this
spot, so unpretentious in itself, but so picturesquely beautiful in its
setting in 1831, Alexander Storrs brought as his wife Phcebe Platt, a
descendant of the worthy family of that name of Plattsburg, New
York.
This mother of the late Mr. Storrs was a somewhat unusual woman,
and there were many traits of the mother manifested in the brilliant
son. She was small in stature, not weighing one hundred pounds ;
energetic in disposition ; fond of books ; well posted in the current
events of the day ; and possessed a voice rich, sweet, and full as
cathedral music. " It is the first good thing of earth, I recollect,"
said the son, "it has reverberated in the air of thought many a time
28 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
in the nights of my absence from her, and if ever I hear angels'
voices I know whose shall be the leading contralto." The father
was a tall, well-proportioned man, keen-eyed, strong-marked in his
features ; of good rank as a country lawyer, and, withal, somewhat
prominent as a " squire," or justice-of-the-peace, for more than forty
years ; looked up to as a safe counselor by all the inhabitants of his
county; in 1855 the representative of his district in the New York
State Legislature. He yet lives,* sorrowing his wife who passed
away in March, 1885, only a few months before the loved son. By
their marriage there were three other children besides Emery :
Rosetta, now Mrs. John A Grow, of New York City, and Caroline,
wife of John Adams, of Ischua, New York State, and a son, Mar
shall, who died in 1855, when about nine years of age.
The Storrs family of Worcester, Otsego County, New York, were
represented, at the time of General Garfield's campaign for the Pres
idency, by a cousin of Mr. Alexander Storrs, who bore the ancestral
name of Nathaniel. General Garfield's father's family had been res
idents of Worcester, and he had after much diligent research collect
ed a number of traditions relating to his own progenitors at that
period. In the course of his inquiries, he had ascertained that a
great-grandfather of Emery A. Storrs had attended his own grand
father during his last illness ; and when, during the campaign of
1880, he was brought into immediate and frequent contact with Mr.
Storrs, their acquaintance ripened into intimacy. General Gar-
field communicated to Mr. Storrs this interesting fact of the bond
between the families in the following pleasant letter :
"MENTOR, OHIO, July 20, 1880.
" HON. EMERY A. STORRS,
"99 Washington Street,
"Chicago, 111.
" MY DEAR SIR : — Accept my thanks for your kind letter of July I9th.
I have read with great pleasure your very able and effective speech at
Burlington, Iowa. It is incisively aggressive, as all our speeches ought to
be. The attempt to put our party on the defensive on my behalf cannot
succeed. I am particularly obliged to you for what you say in reference
to the De Golyer matter.
" From what your father writes, it is clear that it was your grandfather who
so tenderly and courageously took care of my grandfather during his sick
ness, and buried him after his death. I am glad to know this fact. It
warms my heart with gratitude to know that I have found a living descen-
* Since the penning of these lines, Aug. 25th, 1886, Alexander Storrs, the father, died,
aged 78 years.
ORIGIN AND EARLY EXPERIENCES. 2Q
dant of the man whose name has so long been a household word in my
family.
" Whenever you come in reach of me, I hope you will call.
" Very truly yours,
"J. A. GARFIELD."
Collateral testimony to the same fact was borne to Mr. Storrs by
an old and respected citizen of Chicago, Mr. Robert F. Queal,
for many years a prominent member of the Methodist denom
ination, a trustee and valued officer of the Northwestern Uni
versity at Evanston, and for some years a director of the Chicago
Public Library, of whose Managing Board he was one of the first
members. Writing under date February 7, 1881, from Millview,
near Pensacola, Florida, where he was attending to business inter
ests, this gentleman said :
"DEAR SIR: — You will pardon the intrusion of one having no personal
acquaintance. I am moved to write this note by seeing your name so gen
erally and favorably mentioned by the Chicago press for a place in General
Garfield's Cabinet.
" I am a native of Worcester, Otsego County, N. Y., and a year or two
ago, prompted by a letter written by General Garfield and published in the
local newspaper of Worcester, interested myself in confirming the traditions
General Garfield had concerning his father's family as connected with Wor
cester. This I was able to do, and to add new facts of interest to his pre
vious knowledge. This service on my part led to a very pleasant corre
spondence with General Garfield while he was still a member of Congress,
to a call upon him at his home in Washington, and to a brief call upon
him at Mentor after his nomination. Even before his election to the Sen
ate, I had written him that his traditions of the connection of a Storrs family
with the sickness and death of his grandfather left no doubt on my mind
that it was the family with which you were immediately connected. Pursuing
my inquiries, I called last summer on Nathaniel Storrs, your father's cousin,
who occupies the old Storrs homestead on ' Ingalls hill ' or ' West hill ' in
Worcester, and found my conjectures fully confirmed. It was the father
of Nathaniel — Rufus Storrs — and the father of Rufus, your great-grandfather,
that attended the grandfather of General Garfield, Thomas Garfield, in his
last illness, nursed and cared for him (his wife and children being removed
for safety, he having small-pox), and who, with one other neighbor,
when he, a "stalwart man of thirty, was dead, prepared the body and took
it upon a stone-boat, at three o'clock at night, with a yoke- of cattle to
burial.
"1 stood last summer on the site of the log-house, now an open field, on a
stony hillside, where these events transpired eighty years ago. I took, in July
last, to the General and his mother, some souvenirs of the place, — among other
3<D LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
things a fragment of the rude fire-place and hearth-stone where blazed the
fires that warmed the room where his father was born, and where he was
left fatherless at two years of age.
" Seeing your name so prominently and influentially mentioned in con
nection with General Garfield's cabinet, I was impressed that it would
certainly be a curious circumstance of especial interest should these families,
so connected in offices of humanity eighty years ago, become through their
descendants officially connected in such high place in the administration of
the government.* * * I said to General Garfield last summer that I thought
the birthplace of his father was not a mile from where your father was
born."
In this country, the early life and experience of any man who
seems to have achieved success or eminence in any occupation
or pursuit, on investigation prove strikingly similar to those of
many others. It is true that honor and fame from no condition
rise. Given a reasonable inheritance of sterling blood, ability if
only of an average degree to begin with, a definite longing, and
will enough to be persistent, and the result is success or emin
ence or — an early death. It often proves a magnificent lever to
be born poor, or in circumstances which tend to press the fac
ulties to best exertions, but neither is necessary. Poverty may,
as a rule, be more stimulating towards ambition, for it is natural
to flee from the wolf; but blood and brains are not necessarily
fettered by gold, no more for the growing than for the matured
man. Possession of wealth ought to be possession of that which
polishes and broadens. The boy, Emery A. Storrs, was about
the average American boy of the first half of this century. He
was not born a genius. Brilliant philippics, a wonderful flow of
oratory, did not stream from his baby lips. The keen blade of
his famous, searching wit was only edged after the grind of long
years of intensest application. The splendid powers of the advo
cate and jurist were developed in toiling study when the mass
of his fellows were wrapped in sleep. He possessed genius, surely,
and much of it, but such genius is possible for all, and the
shadows of his genius, from encircling his eyes during many
years, deepened into his tomb.
The boy, Emery, therefore was well-blooded. He attained,
too, in time, the genius of hard labor. Moreover, he had the
stimulation of the knowledge that to live, he must earn. But it
would have been better in his case if he could have been born
with Fortunatus' inexhaustible purse, for inappreciation of money
ORIGIN AND EARLY EXPERIENCES. 31
was his chief evil all through life ; or better yet would it have
been had his breath been drawn in the air of that favored Greece
he so loved to refer to, in that period of oratory when to utter
words that measured music to listening ears was to have wealth
and rank poured upon the utterer.
He had certain ability, also, or, rather, decided proclivities
which were judiciously fostered into marked characteristics : a
taste for letters and a fondness for intellectual approbation. At
the age of four he had spelled through the easy words and
stories of the primers, and was endeavoring to read the simpler
newspaper articles. His father had an idea, which was put in
practice, that the parents of American children may exercise a
strong influence for the good of the rising generation by sur
rounding and interesting the young, at their homes, aside from
public school education, with various fresh primers and illustrated
books for beginners, by discussion at the fireside over the school
exercises of the day, and by exciting their attention in the cur
rent events of the nation and of the peoples across the sea. One
result of such gradual molding of the naturally earnest nature of
a child like Emery was that by the time he had attained the
age of twelve years, he was both a versatile scholar and a
splendid historian. Doubtless with the major portion of the
American young such methods of inculcating versatility and
historical knowledge would work no other end than good, but,
with the delicate frame and enlarged nervous organization of this
subject there were unpromising incidents — as, for instance,
when one day the six-year-old lad was found seated in an old
rocking chair, his slender fingers clasping a heavy7 book, the
large head drooped on the narrow breast, the whole body in a
deep faint.
This taste for letters is clearly shown in literary attempts
when a mere child. In a work to be devoted chiefly to illus
trating the excellencies of his best and maturest years, especially
as a wit and orator, it may be construed by some readers to be
a wasteful digression to more than refer to a strong aptitude for
writing possessed in years which in most lives merge into
infancy ; but there may be others and a greater number, wrho
will not only pardon but be pleased at the introduction in these
pages of one or two, from many, of the incipient indications of
32 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
that strong and felicitous intellectual power which in later years
so often stirred and delighted.
Stored away in a little, dark garret-chamber of his old home
was what might be called the treasure-box of the mother. Until
death had hushed to earthly ears that voice which was always
music — at least to the son who was destined so soon to follow
the vanishing melody — no one of the family had known just
what that box contained. It was filled with literary efforts
of first the child, and then of the eloquent man. School-boy
compositions, juvenile attempts at poetry ; then, older essays,
newspaper clippings, political notes, and printed legal briefs. It
was the old repeated story, never altogether apart from pathos,
the mother's hidden worship for her child.
Among the treasures, thus preserved, were some school news
papers, several pages of large letter paper, carefully lined off so
as to resemble a regularly printed sheet. Who has not seen and
had something to do with like proud types of literature ! They
were yellow and' torn, but "E. A. Storrs, Editor," stood forth
boldly as did all the characters of the clear chirography. One,
"The Casket," dates back to 1842, when Emery was only nine
years of age, but there was a smack of the rich humor, always
ready on the tongue of the speaker of a later period, in the big-
lined prospectus which announced ; — " The Casket is published
semi-monthly at this place. Devoted to Literature, Mechanics,
and the Arts; also Love, Suicide and Murder." There is, also, a
familiar ring in the " Motto: Justice and equal rights to all men
in whatsoever rank or station they may be placed." There are
really remarkably mature sentiments in certain " editorials," with
the adjunct " E. A. S." in this "Casket," as, for instance, as an
illustration of his political taste at so early an age, is one headed
(and the spelling, capitalization, etc., are strictly followed),
"Thoughts on hearing it said that America would soon lose her
independence : "
"What, America lose her independence! No, never as long as she con
tinues to carry out those principles of Justice and of Right which now
actuate the hearts of American freemen. As long as we continue to sup
port the civil and religious institutions of our country, as long as we
support the principles of our forefathers, who will speak to us from the
tombs and say America can be governed and yet be free — no doubt can
exist. The principles of our government are such that we can exercise our
ORIGIN AND EARLY EXPERIENCES. 33
principles. We can think and write what we please. The press is free,
and it is the press that will lay the superstructure of our national, civil and
religious character. But as quick as we love power and forget Right; as
quick as we let intriguing politicians get the hold of our nation ; as quick
as we forsake the civil and religious character of our country ; as quick as
the fire of patriotism ceases to burn within our breast ; as quick as we for
get our fathers who have fought and bled for us ; as quickly as we let the
moral character get corrupt and the liberty of the press be restricted,
Then will America begin to totter, then will the very pillars of our country
totter from their very foundations. And happy proud America will be no
more. Then, fellow citizens, arouse to duty — go forward in the battle field
of your country as your country — go to the field well armed in the cause
of your native land. Remember that all Nations are watching us with a
steady and unerring eye, watching for the favorable moment when they
can approach our native land, the land that has reared us from our
infancy. The land that gave our fathers birth. The land that has rocked
us in the cradle of liberty and Independence. The land for which our
forefathers fought and had lived to see arrive to a state of freedom and
Independence. They of foreign nations will approach our land with a
torch in one hand and as a firebrand will throw it at our land and strive
to set fire to the institutions of our country. Let us arouse then and
extinguish the flame which they might kindle."
The orator's fire was beginning to flame in the nine-year
breast.
Among the miscellaneous collection, written at the same early
age, was found a short essay on the subject " Nature," which is
even a better illustration than the one already given of the ele
vated literary tendency of the boy. After dwelling upon the
thought that the subject " is calculated to awaken sensibilities of
taste and picture to us scenes which will create in our bosoms
the most pleasing and interesting reflections," as shown by the
fact, that "the green lawn, the beautiful grove, the vast ocean,
and the starry heavens are all admired by every attentive
scholar," he writes:
"The hand of fashion can neither change their form nor appearance. Neither
can accident touch them with the finger of change. Who can view the beauti
ful works of nature but with delight? From meditation upon the works of
nature, the thoughts become exalted, the mind is raised above the works
of art and placed upon the author of these wonderful productions. 'It
must have been the intention of the All Wise Creator to make extensive
impressions upon us in placing before our eyes such beautiful objects as
constantly meet them. 'When we gaze over the Universe, we are led to
inquire are not these the works of God ? ' 'Do not they show forth his works ?'
"We are ready to say with surprise, ' how mighty is that Being who created
34 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORRS.
such a variety of objects ! ' ' How strange that any person possessed of moral
and religious impressions can view the beautiful displays of all the natural ex
istence around us but with wonder and love.' The starry heavens have excited
the interest of many great men, such as Galileo, Herschel, Newton, and others.
"The flashing meteor darting through the skies, the caves and caverns of the
earth, the insect that creeps beneath our feet, the lily of the vale, the thunder
that rolls above us, all these cannot help sending through the mind those feel
ings of awe and astonishment which will compel us to exclaim in wonder."
There are crudities, naturally, in this composition, but with
them a certain beauty of expression.
In his eleventh year, he essayed a love story, under the
matter-of-fact title " Which Shall I Choose?" in which the battle
of passions in the mind of a young man named "Fernando,"
who had gone in the pursuit of business from his country home
and " sweet village love upon whom his affections had been
bestowed " to a stirring city scene where, among other tempta
tions, he met "a lovely maid," "her brown hair hanging in curls
on her snowy neck" — was portrayed, with the somewhat unusual
result of his marrying neither. The tale, no doubt, greatly
impressed the academy listeners to the "Palladium" in which it
appeared.
In 1846, when only thirteen years of age, Emery left the
" Academy " of Hinsdale and began to read law and copy legal
papers in the office of his father. He had, though so young,
really finished the practical, if not very elaborate, curriculum of
that little institution of learning in his native village ; and, many
months prior to this change in his duties, had already displayed
a fondness for political events which was to cling to him through
life. It is told how in the excitement attendant upon the elec
tioneering of Polk and Dallas, the school lad primed to over
flowing with newspaper political accounts would harangue his
fellows, and how during the days of the Mexican war, from the
commencement to the close, from the death of Ringgold to the
battle of Chapultepec, he was as vigilant a reader and as accurate
an authority as the neighborhood possessed. For two years he
acted as his father's clerk, and there are many evidences of his
diligence during this time, in reading what would be regarded as
weighty matter for most lads of his age. All the elementary
works on law were carefully read, and in the small frame office
building, standing to-day as in 1846, in one corner of the home-
ORIGIN AND EARLY EXPERIENCES. 37
lot, appear such epitaphs to ended labor as that on the last leaf
of the final volume of Kent's commentaries: "Completed the
reading of this work, August /th, 1848, E. A. Storrs."
Sometime in the fall of 1848, young Storrs entered the law
office of Mr. B. Champlin, of the Town of Cuba, N. Y., a
lawyer who ranked well throughout the adjoining counties and
who later, for two terms, served efficiently as attorney-general of
the State of New York, Here he read and copied, in a full
round hand, and "chored" as one of the duties in those healthy
days of all embryotic lawyers.
"One day in the spring of 1850," says General Gustavus
Scroggs, now a retired lawyer of Buffalo, "while sitting in the
office of Mr. Champlin, at Cuba, waiting for his appearance for
an interview relating to an issue in which we were jointly acting,
I first saw the late Mr. Storrs. My attention was first attracted
and held by the interested way in which the little clerk with the
large head seemed to be engaged in copying a voluminous
legal paper. Getting into conversation with him, I found he was
an unusually intelligent young man. During some days I saw a
great deal of my acquaintance thus made, and the result was
that, having first broached my desire to Mr. Champlin, and
receiving his assent, I entered my friend's office one morning
and said:
"'Emery, how would you like to be a Buffalo lawyer?'
"The reply was — 'The country mouse envied the city mouse,
and I want to go, if only for a time.'"
General Scroggs was of the firm of Austin & Scroggs, Mr.
Austin being at the time district attorney, and each member
ranking well in the legal fraternity of the city. The new clerk
soon made himself indispensable. Though so young, the marked
intellectual power made itself felt, and one of the firm is author
ity for the statement that it soon devolved on his young energies
to investigate every fresh question presented his masters and 'to
outline in a great measure their briefs. The politician continued
to grow with the lawyer. He voiced to his fellow-students in
the Buffalo law school, which he soon entered, opinions upon all
the current events as clear cut and decided as though it was the
man and not the boy who had been surveying the field. His
positivism of idea reached even into his home letters. Take, for
38 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORRS.
an illustration, a sample from a letter written to his father, dated
at Buffalo, No. 230 Main Street, June 23, 1850, while he was
not yet seventeen years old, a short time after going to that
city:
" We are pretty well crowded with business. Mr. Austin is at the court
house all the time. On Monday there is to be tried here in the Supreme
Court a case which will be of the greatest interest to the legal and medi
cal profession. Perhaps Doctor Clarke has heard of the case ; it is The
People vs. Doctor Loomis and Mr. Robie, libel on the information of
Doctor James M. White of this city, professer of Obstetrics in the Medical
College. I will at the earliest opportunity forward you the printed testi
mony and arguments of counsel in the case as I have no doubt but that it
will be interesting to you.
" Have you read the speech of Daniel S. Dickinson at Tammany Hall?
If you have not, do so the first time you see it as it is as splendid an
oratorical effort as ever you saw and is full of truths. I am in hopes that
Mr. Clay's compromise resolutions will pass, so that the government can
have some peace from the ceaseless, useless, and highly dangerous incen
diary harping on the slave question.
" I am more convinced than ever of the folly of continually keeping this
slavery question in our national councils, and those fanatics, come they
from the North or the South, who would seek to make the harassing
question of slavery a dividing line and party test in our national councils
should meet the treatment and fate of a traitor. By persisting in their
fool-hardy measures, they will finally sap and undermine the glorious fabric
of our Republican institutions, founded by the blood and treasure of pat
riots, ' the land of the free and the home of the brave,' the asylum of the
oppressed of all nations, the glory of patriots and philanthropists and the
dread of monarchists and despots."
Within a few months after Gen. Scroggs had taken the country
boy into his office, he earned and was made managing clerk and
upon him devolved the preparations of all the firm's cases. In the
law school, too, he began to be regarded by all the students as
a legal prodigy, and, though the youngest in his class, he became
the acknowledged leader. His extremely sociable disposition, his
love of anecdotes and continually overflowing humor, cemented
the leadership granted by his mates. A faculty of eliminating
the grotesque from the panorama of life was a powerful posses
sion even in these student days. And " his aim and determina
tion," to quote from the description of him as given by a fel
low student of those days who is now himself a prominent jurist
" not to be outdone by any human being were he old or young,"
extended even into the realm of anecdote or story, for nothing
ORIGIN AND EARLY EXPERIENCES. 39
could be related, imaginative or historical, but what he would
match and surpass. This trait, which in after years became so
marked a feature in his intellectual composition, mingled with his
strong reasoning powers, became soon a topic of general com
ment in Buffalo and so enlivened the moot courts of the students,
held in evenings, as to draw audiences composed not only of the
student element but also of the bar and bench of the city.
In November of 1853, young Storrs, by request, enlarged upon
a debate which had attracted considerable attention as indulged
in by this debating club, and presented to a large audience in
Lyceum Hall a lecture of much merit upon the " Growth of the
Laws of Contract." It was deemed at the time as indicating
much promise in a boy not yet having attained his majority,
or to the age when he could be granted his law diploma.
The lecture was one of close presentation of the law, graphi
cally illustrated by familiar examples, and at times had a
touch of eloquence even upon a subject ordinarily supposed
to be dry and uninteresting. Only once during this lecture did
his spirit of humor crop out, but then in a most happy way.
In response to a question, he turned and said that the law did
exercise particular care over the class which could not be included
under the head of " Husband and Wife " (whom he had been
assuming the laws of the day especially watched over and
encouraged), that class composed of beings " usually designated as
bachelors " and that " other equally unfortunate class, the especial
victims of the shortcomings of the class last aforesaid — traveling
disappointments — disembodied spirits of dead hopes and buried
affections made manifest in the flesh, and known as old maids."
The class of old bachelors he thought the law cared for by com
pelling, in the shape of taxes, to contribute to the support and
education of those children who growing up should pity their
choice of existence : the class of old maids, " more unfortunate
than criminal, the law grants the negative privilege, no matter
how much age may have impaired their beauty or soured their
dispositions, of patroling up and down the face of God's
green earth — < fishers of men ' — and of casting their lines into that
great river of contingencies which shortly dividing empties into
the sea of glorious consummation or the gulf of utter despair."
Mr. Storrs was admitted to the practice of the law at Batavia,
4O LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
Genesee County, New York, on the fifth day of September,
1854, and at once became a member of the newly organized firm
of Austin, Storrs & Austin, at Buffalo. Gen. Scroggs withdrew
from his connection with Mr. Austin, and a son of the latter
was joined in the new partnership In this relation, it devolved
upon Mr. Storrs to prepare and take charge of the law issues
of the extensive business of the firm.
Only two days after his admission to the bar. there occurred
the consummation of what had filled Mr. Storr's mind even
more, perhaps, than legal honors for many months. Sometime
late in the year 1852, he had made the acquaintance of a Miss
Caroline P. Mead, a niece of William Mead, a retired lumberman
of Buffalo. Mr. Storrs described his love at first sight, in after
years, as "consummate goneness at incipient comingness," but
a too precipitate display of the passion with which he was
inspired subjected the nineteen-year-old wooer, for such he at
once became, to most cool repulses, not only on the part of the
young lady but also from the uncle in whose sole custody lived
the orphan niece. He proved a good pleader in his own cause,
however, and within a short half-year had not only secured the
favor of the inflamer, but, as is not always the case, even of the
at first obdurate uncle. Marriage, however, was proscribed until
he should become a full-fledged member of the bar.
"My Dear; — " (He wrote to an intimate friend in July, 1853.) "I
wonder if it would be a convincing argument in the law class, provided I as
sume the position that private laws are as unbendingly potent as public laws,
if I should proceed to reason that the stern dictum of Uncle William Mead as
effectually restricts me as does the legislative enactment of the New York law-
molders. Uncle W. M., relentlessly decrees that I may love as a hus
band — he cannot help that! He cannot interfere with the commingled
public and private laws of Heaven, — until I am handed a dried piece of sheep
skin and thereby given full license to li-cense I have attained twenty-one years
and have waded through so many folios; but I must not marry. So far, no
farther. That is a well known private law. The statutes say I can read law,
know law, feel like a lawyer, so long as I wish, but I cannot be a lawyer until
I am twenty-one, perhaps until a third of my life has gone. That is a public
law! I am now and shall forever be an advocate that knowledge, not years,
determines fitness. Let it be knowledge of law, or of love, or of office. As it
is.sometimes knowledge is not power."
He was married to Miss Mead, on the seventh day of Sep
tember, 1854, in the First Presbyterian Church of Buffalo, the
Rev. Dr. John Lord officiating.
ORIGIN AND EARLY EXPERIENCES. 41
Those intimate with the private life of Mr. Storrs can tell that
until the night of his death love for wife and family amounted
to passion. Indeed, it was strangely deep, tender, confiding, and
unchanging. For wife, for family, no desire was allowed to
remain ungratified. The combined causes of impatience for the
attainment of legal manhood seemed but to steep him in a life-
passion. It was once remarked to him that he approached
nearer the genuinely poetic in his best arguments and addresses
whenever his thoughts appeared to encircle a fireside, or when
ever he alluded to wife or mother.
"Why not," he retorted, "I had years to enkindle the glow
for mother; and for wife, " I must have prepared in the fires of
an eternity."
CHAPTER II.
THREE EARLY LITERARY GEMS.
AN ESSAY ON "MODERN CHARITY" — EXPERIMENT IN SERMON WRITING — THE
PARABLE OF THE EWE LAMB — LECTURE ON "IDEALISTS AND UTILI
TARIANS."
AN early illustration of the possession by Mr. Storrs of a
strong vein of sarcasm in his composition was preserved in
a little effort which created some laughter, much applause, and,
it must be confessed, a little angry blood, at the time of its intro
duction. A hatred of sham or pretense characterized the man,
who never cloaked either his merits or demerits, and none ever
lived who could so ruthlessly as he strip from vainglory all the
flimsy pretext of godly charitableness. There had been in pro
gress in the little city of Buffalo during the fall of 1855, and
prior thereto, a gay series of balls for " sweet charity's sake," the
conspicuous management of which had been suspected of head
lining itself in the newspapers more for personal ends and grati
fication than for the promotion of relief for the unfortunate poor.
This management consisted of the social leaders of the city,
and, as is usually the case, while many knowing ones indulged
in significant nods and winks, no one crystalized his thoughts
into words until, boldly over his signature, appeared in the lead
ing weekly paper a bright effusion styled a sermon on " Modern
Charity." The lesson of the sermon was so manifest and so
pointed, in the light of all the existing circumstances, that young
Storrs did not hear the last of it for many a day. In truth,
though preached more than three decades ago, there is pungency
in the words as read to-day.
The sermon began in a semi-humorous tone concerning the
42
THREE EARLY LITERARY GEMS. 43
superficiality of those who fail to note the wonderful changes
which the progress of civilization constantly effects in mankind,
and of those who could not have failed otherwise to perceive
that between the charity which now exists and that quality
which the Bible calls charity there are wide and essential differ
ences ; indeed; charity, as we would understand it to be from our
Bibles, has been so much improved upon in the progress of civili
zation, he wrote, as to bear but slight resemblance to the original,
until at times he had been almost led to believe that in the very
many modern improvements upon it, the original article styled
charity had been refined out of existence. Examination develops
points of similiarity, but, nevertheless, it is true that —
"Charity as it now is, and charity as it was two thousand years ago
should operate in entirely different channels, proceed from altogether differ
ent motives, be devoted to entirely different purposes, and produce altogether
different results than when as a quality of the human heart it was but in
its infancy.
" Civilized man has learned vastly to extend the field of its operations, and
in its various elaborations and changes it bears the most conclusive testi
mony to the immeasurable superiority of the nineteenth century over every
other. Knowing full well that we do not properly appreciate the results of
modern civilization, and from the fact that but very little has been written
or said concerning the vast improvements in social position and in every
department of human knowledge, which have been offered for mankind in
this the nineteenth century, it would seem proper that the modest and
retiring disposition so characteristic of civilized men in the present age and
which leads them to place no high estimate upon their own powers, and
to institute no comparisons between themselves and races of men who
have lived before them, at all unfavorable to the latter, should be broken
in upon and our people particularly be excited to a just estimate of their
own greatness and of their vast superiority over their ancestors.
" It is indeed a sublime moral spectacle to see, as we have seen, the first
circles of our society moved unanimously and simultaneously to the exercise
of this most blessed of all the virtues! Have we not seen multitudes of
the fairest gathering at a fancy ball, an institution of modern invention,
whose hearts beat with the purest sympathy for the misery and wretched
ness of the shivering poor around them. That was the kind of" charity
which cndureth long. When we reflect that those delicate forms which
before had never been clad in aught save the costliest fabrics, to decorate
which Parisian taste and genius had been exhausted and the golden fields
of California taxed to their utmost ; those forms of almost etherial lightness
and grace which, glistening in diamonds and robed in the most magnificent
fabrics of the East, had night after night in the glitter of brilliantly illumi
nated and highly decorated halls captivated all hearts, for the purposes of
44
LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
charity — when we reflect upon all this, that ancient charity which would
have contented itself by relieving the wretched and the suffering by overt
contributions of food and clothing, or by furnishing them with employment
at liberal prices, fades, as it were, into insignifioance in the comparison.
-x- * * * HO\V vastly different from and superior to the old, old-fashioned
charity! How rude and vulgar in the comparison does the latter appear!
The charitable of the olden time would have hunted out the miserable and
needy objects of their goodness in their wretched homes. Descending from
their high position, they would have visited dark and loathsome alleys,
attacked famine and starvation in their very citadels, and so far undignified
themselves as to have come into personal contact with suffering poverty
and, with their own hands, administered relief directly to it. ModeVn
charity ingeniously evades all these unpleasant accomplishments. Instead
of making the proper dispensation of charity a laborious and self-denying
duty, it is rendered a source of pleasure and amusement. Healing is born
to the sick upon waves of waltzing music, and from the whirl of the polka
and the din of fashionable entertainments comes bread for the hungry and
clothing for the naked. Paul, considered in his age and generation a very
wise and worthy man, in his instructions to his church at Corinth said:
' Charity suffereth long, and is kind ; charity envieth not ; charity vaunteth
not itself, is not puffed up.' Paul is now ranked with fogies, and the
present system of charity demonstrates the very unphilosophical basis upon
which his ideas rest.
"Moderns have discovered that example is the most effective of all teach
ers. Advertising was an art entirely unknown to the people to whom Paul's
remarks were directed, and in order that a charitable act should produce
its full and legitimate effect it must be advertised, it must be published as
an example. If Mr. Davis Doubloons, the opulent and charitable banker,
contributes one hundred dollars for the manufacture of bone soup for the
poor, the fact must be announced under larger capitals and with many com
mendatory remarks in order that Mr. John Crowsur and many other chari
table and opulent bankers and merchants may be induced to do likewise ;
thus, we see readily how great a mistake Paul committed when he said, ' Charity
vaunteth not itself — quite as great a mistake, also, in saying 'Charity
emrieth not.' We have discovered what Paul did not know, that great and
beneficial results are produced by emulation, and emulation is but another
name for envy. Accordingly, when the opulent and charitable Mr. Crowsur
observes in all the morning papers the announcement of the munificent
donation of his neighbor, Mr. Doubloons, the noble fire of emulation seizes
his bosom, and he immediately contributes one hundred and twenty-five
dollars for the purchase of a magnificent Shakespeare for his beloved pastor.
This act of genuine Qharity being immediately published through the length
and breadth of the land developes the same quality in the most extraordi
nary quarters, and straightway men whom the world before had considered
given up entirely to the worship of wealth and to the strife after worldly
honors, contribute liberally to some charitable purpose.
" The old-fashioned charity of which Paul wrote did not behave itself
THREE EARLY LITERARY GEMS. 45
unseemly, sought not her own, was not easily provoked, thought no evil.
The leading events of the present age exhibit in a very striking light the
decided superiority, in these respects also, of modern charity. Modern
charity has a much more practical basis, well knowing that in allowing
others to possess what is not properly their own would result in confused
notions of the rights of property, it distinctly asserts its own rights and
enforces them.
"Paul and his believers, following a morbid and unhealthy sentiment would
have seen others entertaining the most heretical and unorthodox ideas, and
would have extended respect to honest opinions however variant from theirs,
using only argument and the example of their own conduct to remove these opin
ions, thinking that human nature at best is erring and that the human under
standing is not always correct. Those who differed essentially from them
they considered as friends, whom they were desirous of benefitting by conver
sion to what they deemed proper belief, rather than of persecuting for
errors of the understanding.
" How much more practical are we ! Knowing that in this nineteenth century
reason has reached its highest development and that human prefectibility has
been attained, we are certain that our opinions are correct in every instance,
and that they are the only ones which can ensure real happiness to their pos
sessors. Whenever, therefore, we come in contact with those whose ideas differ
from ours, out of pure charity for them and in order that they may enjoy that
perfect happiness which is our portion, by various means of petty persecu
tion, we either force them to acknowledge the errors of their belief, or banish
them from society, and leave them to the enjoyment of that miserable existence
which such wilfulness richly deserves. * * * * *
" The old-fashioned charity had a spirit which compassed the globe. Bearing
all things, believing all things, hoping all things, enduring all things, it
looked with tender compassion upon man's sorrows and sins, pitied his
weaknesses, by active exertions relieved his miseries, trusted every man as
a brother of whom God was the common parent, considered no man better
than another but all erring, all needing sympathy and assistance. Even in
our day has this old-fashioned charity found its admirers. Weak-minded
and impractical men, like Thomas Hood singing the 'Song of the Shirt'
and the ' Bridge of Sighs ' have endeavored to excite us to the exercise of
the Bible charity; but the crowded alleys of our populous cities, the want
and the wretchedness which stare us in the face at every corner, the
thousands of ruined and abandoned women, exiles from home and outcasts
upon the face of the Earth, the pale faces and stooping forms of sewing
girls sustaining life upon the merest pittance of wages, all abundantly
testify that we are not to be misled by any such false appeals to our
sympathies.
"Modern charity spurns the shivering beggar from its door and refusing
relief sends him to a home where want and sorrow never come ; it erects
magnificent churches and does not allow them to be contaminated by
plebian worshipers; it teaches sewing girls economy and self-denial by
46 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
limiting their wages, and forbearance and meekness by beating them ; it
contributes large sums of money in disseminating tracts amongst the Hin
doos and flannel shirts to the Patagonians, and praises God so loudly that
the wail of sorrow and the sigh of the broken and bleeding heart are never
once heard."
This sarcastic thrust was one of three literary productions,
written about the same date, unlike in their general tone to
any other emanations of their author, and each deeply tinged
with an earnest religious sentiment. The one, " Modern Charity "
appeared " October 20, 1855," the second, entitled "The Ewe
Lamb," dated " December, 1855," it cannot be certainly said was
ever before shown to other eyes than those of him who wrote it ;
the third of the group, " Idealists and Utilitarians," was written
as a lecture and delivered before the students of Medina
College, in the town of that name, New York, the evening
of January 13, 1856. The second named in its historical
order, "The Ewe Lamb" is a gem of religious literature, chaste
and beautiful in diction and far-reaching in its powerful lesson.
It would be difficult in all English letters to discover anywhere a
more perfect type of a logical lesson from the scriptures. If ever
read to anyone, it must have been at some religious gathering
about the time it was written. The little sermon, however,
deserved a better fate than to have lain hidden for more than
thirty years. Its character and brevity warrant reproduction in
full :
"And the Lord sent Nathan unto David. And he came unto him, and
said unto him, There were two men in one city ; the one rich and the other
poor. The rich man had exceeding many flocks and herds : but the poor
man had nothing, save one little lamb which he had bought and nour
ished up ; and it grew up together with him, and with his children ; it
did eat of his own meat, and drank of his own cup, and lay in his
bosom, and was unto him as a daughter. And there came a traveler
unto the rich man, and he spared to take of his own flock and of his
own herd, to dress for the wayfaring man that was come unto him ; but
took the poor man's lamb, and dressed it for the man that was come
to him. And David's anger was greatly kindled against the man ; and
he said to Nathan : As the Lord liveth, the man that hath done this
thing shall surely die : and he shall restore the lamb fourfold, because
he did this thing, and because he had no pity. And Nathan said to
David, Thou art the man. — 2 Samuel, XII., 1-7.
" There is not in the whole range of literature, ancient or modern,
sacred or profane, a narrative more pure and simple in its style, more
touching in its character, or carrying with it a better lesson, than that we
THREE EARLY LITERARY GEMS. 47
make the subject of the evening's remarks. Across the chasm of more
than three thousand years that lesson comes to us with none of its force
impaired and quite as applicable to us to-day in many respects as to the
terrified King who stood at the close of its recital self-condemned before the
stern and justice-meting prophet.
"This David seemed to have been above all men chosen and honored
of God. Fame, riches, every temporal and physical comfort or luxury,
honor, troops of friends, success in battle, triumph over foes, all these
were his, and it would have seemed that all temptation or occasion for
sin had been removed from him. He saw, however, the wife of Uriah,
the Hittite, and her he coveted for himself. He placed the faithful servant
in the front rank of the battle where the contest raged the hottest and the
arrows flew the thickest, and Uriah fell a victim to the passions of his King.
"And now observe how skillfully the old prophet wrought up the guilty
King to a virtuous indignation of his own act. Against the rich man who
would take the poor man's lamb to dress for the wayfaring man that was
come to him, David's anger was greatly kindled ; the punishment to be
inflicted was condign and speedy. He felt no doubt a great degree of
moral exaltation in passing such severe sentence upon and in showing his
hatred of the merciless and cruel act narrated by the prophet, but when
the stern prophet said unto him, ' Thou art the man,' David saw at once
the full meaning of the simple story so touchingly told ; and, humiliated and
abased, stood self-condemned before his accuser.
"The primary lesson conveyed by this story I apprehend to be this: that
right sentiment and correct religious or moral belief constitute but a
small portion of the true and genuine Christian character. Indeed, that
unless these sentiments and this belief, which are but as the blossoms upon
the tree, flourish and ripen into the fruit of active good deeds, they are as
worthless as those blossoms when the frosts have blasted or the winds
whirled them away ; and, inasmuch as our various creeds and theologies
elevate belief simply into such high places among the catalogue of Chris
tian virtues, this truth, apparently so plain and simple, becomes of the
vastest importance in guiding and regulating the conduct of men.
" What avails it that he who professes and loudly asserts his belief in the
perfect character of Christ and His teachings, overreaches his neighbor by
trickery and fraud, gains possession of his means, and entertains the way
faring stranger out of his riches so basely acquired? What avails it that
he who asserts as his belief or his sentiment the great leading element of
Christianity ' love thy neighbor as thyself,' should think of his neighbor
simply as a tool to be used, one of the rounds of the ladder upon which
he is to step in his climbing after fame or riches. We listen to the story
of wrong perpetrated abroad ; we are told that in distant lands thousands
are perishing for food, dying of want, because the rulers take the profits of
famishing labor ; we, as did David of old, warm into virtuous wrath, are
full of flaming indignation, while the wail of sorrow and the cry of the
broken and bleeding heart is heard uncomforted at our very doors. We
talk loudly of our far-reaching charities, but the crowded and reeking and
48 LIFE OF EMERY A- STORKS.
loathsome alleys of our populous cities, the multitudes of children rapidly
becoming proficient in vice and crime, the thousands of ruined and aban
doned women, are the' sorry, the tragical commentaries on the genuineness
of our lofty sentiment. We profess the largest freedom of opinion, the
utmost liberality of sentiment. We grow fiercely indignant when we hear
that the heathen have dined off a missionary or that some good man a
great way off has been prohibited the utterance of his opinion, but every
day we immolate upon the altar of our self-conceit some other missionary
for some purpose foreign to our own. We taboo and shut out from society
the utterer of an heterodox sentiment.
' ' We believe in the universal spread of the great truths of the Christian relig
ion, build churches wherein that religion shall be preached, and place the
expense of salvation at so high a price that no plebian can ever hope, save
through some lucky enterprise, to grasp it. We believe in and talk loudly
of the purity and simplicity of the Christian character, and doze over a con
servative sermon, on velvet cushions with gilded prayer books, glittering
under the light streaming upon them through generously painted windows.
We claim to be proud of the plain and simple habits of our fathers, but
broadcloth and ' doe skin have long since triumphed over sheep' s-gray and
satinet. Merrimac and calico are now only worn by the unregenerated.
We are sorry that so much extravagance exists, but bury our grief under
point lace, moire antique, and sables. Good, conservative men, classed
among ' the first citizens ' will have a dinner of many courses, and dis
course to the poor on the necessity of self-denial, abstinence, and temperance.
"Imagine that the stern old prophet should approach us as he did the
Hebrew King, should recite to us in terms as simple and as beautiful as to
his royal hearer some fancied tale of wrong, some act of injustice, would
not all our noble sentiment be in a moment aroused ? Would we not call
loudly for punishment, and finally would not the prophet startle us from
our conceited repose by the terrible rebuke ' Thou art the man ! ' And so
we see that no man's salvation rests upon his belief, upon his sentiment,
upon what he thinks and feels, but upon what he does in the world — upon
what good he actually accomplishes. If I see my neighbor extremely pious
on the Sabbath. If he worships one day out of seven in the most orthodox
church, and denounces most vigorously the sins of the Babylonians, the
short-comings and the coveteousness of the Jews, and the next day defrauds
an Israelitish dealer, I claim that his belief avails him not, it is but the
blossom which the frosts have blasted, which the winds have whirled away.
But he who relieves his neighbor in distress, who every day of his life,
from Christian motive deals honorably and fairly with his fellow, is entitled
to and will receive his reward. This is the lesson which our text teaches.
Let us heed it."
One who was a listener to the lecture on " Idealists and Utili
tarians " narrates graphically the circumstances of its delivery at
Medina. Mr. Storrs was one of several speakers comprising a
" students course" for the Winter of 1855-6, and had been
THREE EARLY LITERARY GEMS. 49
selected and invited as one of the lecturers by the college asso
ciation, some members of which had heard of the rising fame of
the Buffalo lawyer whose original utterances had already extended
by admiring repetition through the neighboring region. It trans
pired that he was supposed to be a man somewhat mature in
years, and when the smooth-faced, slightly built young fellow,
but little more than twenty-two years of age, met the reception
committee at the hotel before proceeding to the hall, the first
thought was that there had been a mistake. In a few minutes,
however, the stripling was holding his reception committee, as
they stood crowded about the stove, in rapt admiration at the
marvelous flow of racy sayings pouring forth after one another
as though the fountain was inexhaustible. In 1884, during the
first visit to Chicago of Mr. Henry Irving, that great actor, said
to a friend, " I sat in Mr. Storrs' room last night for a half-
hour, I had thought, until rising to go I found my half-hour
was from eleven till after three in the morning. He is the most
wondrous conversationalist." So, with the reception committee
at Medina.
The night was one following a day of heavy snow, and it was
dark and intensely cold, yet the lecture-room was overflowing
with a mixed audience of citizens and students. The speaker
when he took his position upon the platform appeared, so youth
ful was his figure and face, like a mere boy of sixteen or
eighteen years of age, and a murmur of surprise was plainly
audible; but the surprise soon merged into admiration. Self-
possessed, with marked deliberation, in a voice remarkable for
its tone and power, the young orator began with the words that
in the course of his very limited literary experience it had been
his fortune to listen to few lectures professing to exhaust the
subject upon which they were based, that the exceptions he had
learned to be attended with an exceedingly unfavorable co-inci
dent, namely that the patience of the audience was exhausted
about the same time or perhaps a little before the subject.
After analyzing his view of the ideal and the practical, he gradu
ally developed his theme as carefully prepared in his paper, until
becoming warmed by his fire of thought he less and less con
fined himself to his manuscript, his voice quickened in its
utterance, now rose and now fell with the modulation of his
thought, until, seemingly forgetful of himself as he uttered his
4
5O LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
apostrophe to the poetry of mechanical enterprise, he stepped
away from his written effort, and for an hour and a half held
his audience entranced. One present, and now living, says that
the by-play of wit and the metaphors evidently inspired by the
occasion were as the product of a temporary inspiration not to be
preserved in ink. The manuscript of this attempt on the part
of Mr. Storrs to formally lecture was worded thus :
"A very eminent philosopher, who now sleeps with the forgotten dead,
divided mankind into two classes; those who had been hanged, and those who
had not been hanged. Fault has been found with this classification as being
too general. The division of our present society into Idealists and Utilitarians is
open to the same objection; but, I apprehend, nevertheless, that a careful and
unbiased consideration of the pecularities of the classes I have mentioned, may
lead us to avoid the defects of each, and to strive after and emulate the merits
of both. If any such result be obtained, the classification will be sufficiently
definite for our present purpose.
"In considering this subject, I must be allowed to give the widest latitude of
meaning to the words Idealist and Utilitarian which their customary use will
permit; a latitude somewhat wider perhaps, than a strict adherence to the
terms would justify. With the Idealist I shall rank the philosopher, the thinker
and the man of letters; with the Utilitarian, I shall, also, include many whom
the strict meaning of the word would not embrace.
" My present purpose futhermore, is to consider only the Idealists and
Utilitarians who are honest in the opinions which they hold. With the
Idealist who is so, merely because it is genteel to be so, whose highest
idea of the divine spirit of poetry finds its manifestations in a Byronical and
an assumed misanthropic hatred of mankind, whose philosophy or idealism
is the result rather of a diseased stomach the effect of late, suppers, than
genuine thought or inspiration ; with the Utilitarian, who creates books and
authors merely to exhibit his own superior wisdom and who wilfully shuts
his eyes against everything in the shape of a stubborn, universally-acknow
ledged fact, — with these men we have nothing to do ; it would require a
distinct lecture to give these base frauds and counterfeits their full deserts.
" It has of late been quite the fashion with a certain class of our writers
to decry and lament the practical and utilitarian tendencies of the age. In
this blind and short-sighted crusade of the ideal against the practical, I con
sider a great mistake is made. It is the nature of man, at least of specu
lative, thinking man, when told that a thing is valuable to inquire why it is so,
what has it accomplished ; show us some beneficial result proceeding from
your system or idea before asking us to admire it ; these questions and this
demand are eminently just and proper, and, therefore, those ideas which
assume a tangible shape, and produce some immediate and visible result,
will always be the most popular and the most praised.
" The thinker, the philosopher, in the quiet and seclusion of his study, shut
out from contact with the busy world, after laborious thought and investiga-
THREE EARLY LITERARY GEMS. 5 I
tion, originates in his mind a system of philosophy, or, perhaps, an idea
applicable to some mechanical project which he conceives to' be of the most
vital interest and importance. Of its value, he has the very highest notion.
He proclaims it to the world, and asks the world to recognize its importance
and to bestow upon him the full measure of praise, to which, in his own
mind, such a brilliant discovery justly entitles him. The probabilities are,
that the great mass of mankind are unable to see the system, or idea, with
the same eyes as he to whom it owes its origin. In a matter of such
importance they ask for proof. If, they say, you have really climbed the
highest mountain of thought, have reached the very summit, and plucked
any portion of the bright fruits growing thereon, be kind enough to give us
who are yet toiling in the valleys of mediocrity, in the deep shadows of the
high mountain, some demonstrative evidence of the success which you claim
to have achieved.
" If you have indeed the true knowledge planted directly within the
centre of your intellectual garden, the right to the unlimited use and
enjoyment of its fruits, convince us who are not equally fortunately situated
of the justness of your assertion by permitting us to see and taste the
fruit ; although we are not geniuses, nor philosophers like yourself, we can
still be convinced by competent proof, our minds are open to conviction,
but we have been before now so bitterly deceived by glittering specimens
held at a tempting distance, that our experience teaches us to surrender
ourselves converts to no theory, or idea, or system of whatever kind with
out the completest evidence of its genuineness.
" The Idealist very much mistakes his true interest in bestowing, as many
of them do, such unmeasured abuse upon the practical. They seem to
overlook the great fact, that the object for which they are so earnestly
striving is to secure the practical operation of their ideas and theories ; of
what earthly use is an idea, resting merely in the mind and taking no
practical channel? If a man's head be full of this class of ideas, which in
their application to the wants of mankind can produce no beneficial results,
either to his physical, moral, intellectual, or social nature, it would be well
to give them immediate notice to quit, turn out the entire vagabond
company, and substitute in its place the multiplication table, or the rule
of three. In point of fact utter emptiness would be preferable.
"That class of ideas which cannot be driven in any practical road, nor
harnessed and compelled to work in any useful way, were undoubtedly
intended by Divine Providence in His inscrutable wisdom to fulfil some
useful mission ; but no human sagacity has ever yet been able to fathom
his designs in inflicting them upon mankind. Wars, pestilence and famine
keep down the surplus population — our war with Mexico, for example, rid
many of our large cities of gangs of loafers and swindlers, who, in the
ordinary course of nature, would have infested society for years. Thunder
storms clear the atmosphere. Large freshets destroying the products of an
entire year's industry, fructify and make more useful the soil. Boils and car
buncles are troublesome things to be sure, but they purify the blood. All
the ills indeed to which flesh is heir have some beneficial results, but on
52 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
this crowded planet, an idea which cannot be made to work, is like a bull
in a china shop, very much out of place, and the sooner it is starved out
of existence the better.
"This rage of ideas has in many instances reached a sickening excess.
That class of philosophers who pride themselves so highly upon their
heaven-born genius rail with the utmost virulence against everything which
can be turned to a useful purpose. They censure us in their wisdom
because' we cover our land with the network of railroads ; call us gross
materialists because we plough the ocean with our steamships. Deprecate
and decry as altogether wrong and out of place that noble spirit of
enterprise so characteristic of our age which whitens every sea with the
sails of a commerce so extended that its fibres intimately interlace the fate
of kingdoms. The captious Idealist fails to perceive what every one must
feel, that that ceaseless activity, that grand march of the human mind, that
warfare of light and knowledge against oppression and ignorance and
superstition and fraud which is now being waged all over the world, and in
which we are all more or less actively engaged, is a sublimer epic than
ever poet sang or dreamed. Poetry, is that what you desire? Do you find
no poetry in that invincible, that sublime perseverance and enterprise
which enabled the stern and hardy Puritan to triumph over every obstacle,
subdue the elements themselves, and to convert the cold, rocky and sterile
soil of New England into a fertile garden? Was it not the divine inflatus
which has erected the altar of human worship in the human heart, which
has peopled a continent, rich in every variety of agricultural product, which
has demonstrated the great idea of self-government, which has called into
existence a literature broad and catholic in its spirit, a literature which even
in its infancy has achieved for itself immortality. Poetry ? why my captious
critic, the shrill defiant whistle of that locomotive which you affect to
despise so much, grimed with smoke, rushing in its mighty course uith
thousands on its back, demonstrating as it does the triumph of mind over
the apparently most uncontrollable of physical agents, sings its grand song
of human progress with a cadence which drowns your fault-finding in its
sublime charms, and beats your intangible philosophy, your intractable
ideas, out of sight.
"Of what use, say we to the Idealists, are ideas, except they be made
productive of some good to the human race?
"What is the use of learning and thought and systems of philosophy
unless they operate in some way or the other to benefit and improve mankind ?
A genuine idea is not a dead unproductive thing, it will make itself felt, it
will come down from its high spiritual existence, clothe itself with robes of
materiality, and wear them gracefully, and to some useful purpose. Don't
rail at the practical ; it is, as it were, the noblest ideas which have ever
endowed genius ; it is born of Heaven and Immortality, made manifest in
the flesh. Every practical result in mechanics, in morals, and in our intel
lectual or social nature, is but an idea, the result of human thought and
investigation operating in its proper and legitimate channel. .
THREE EARLY LITERARY GEMS. 53
"When we look, on the querulous and fault-finding philosopher, upon
the deep seams which care has ploughed in your forehead, at the grey
hairs prematurely making their appearance, at those u^ly wrinkles with
which bad temper has disfigured your face, we much prefer to remain in
the quiet contentedness of what you call our stupidity and ignorance, than
to barter it N away for the learning, the wisdom which only serves to
embitter your temper, and which you are not able to turn to any good
account. We tell you, and all of your like, that with all your noise, with all
your talk about our gross stupidity, our degrading materialism, unless your wis
dom can be made to produce some good in the world, we shall beg leave most
respectfully to consider you but another species of that already mighty host
denominated humbugs.
"The Ultra-Utilitarian has also, it will be seen, his peculiar defects and short
comings. He looks only to the thing itself and despises, or affects to despise,
the source from which it originated. He owns steam-boats and railroad stocks ;
is a director in telegraph companies ; lights his house with gas ; advertises largely
in the daily newspapers, but yet it never once occurs to him but that these
things were always so. He seems to think that steamboats and locomotives
were born into existence complete at once, or like Dogberry's reading and
writing came by instinct. He knows, to be sure, that poles are set and wires ex
tended for telegraphic communications, but as to who first did these things or
why, he had no more idea than had his Britannic Majesty, George III., how
the apples ever got inside the dumpling. He looks simply at the effect and
never at the cause. He has a profounder respect for the owner of a line of
ocean or lake steamers, than for Mr. Robert Fulton who never kept a
bank account. He has a holy horror of sentiment of all kinds. He
teaches his children facts and enforces upon them that profound piece of
philosophy 'Money makes the mare go.' His own morality is summed up
in that selfish little maxim, 'Honesty is the best policy.' — Be honest, not
because it is a Christian duty, a moral obligation, but because you can
make more money that way in the long run. He gives a false and ridicu
lous pre-eminence to the effect over the cause. He sees the practical
working of the steam-engine and the locomotive, but of -the great principle
which propels them, the idea which underlies it all, he knows nothing. He
cannot recognize merit in any idea or principle or thing, save where it
operates directly within the cognizance of the senses, upon the material
substances ; hence in him, literature, poetry, find no friend. He laughs and
sneers in his contemptuous way at every appeal to high sentiment ; to kind
and gentle sympathies, to humane and tender emotions, to noble and lofty
aspirations, denominating it as stuff and sickly sentimentality, and those
who know and excite all the emotions, weak-minded and sentimental. Weak-
minded and sentimental ! Who are you ? shouting that it is dark because
thick scales of prejudice shut from you the glorious sunlight? you who
insist that no cry, nor sorrow, nor distress is ever heard because the noise
of your busy machinery has made you deaf? you who laugh at and scorn
human affections, sympathy, and high and noble ambitions, because the
feverish heat of trade has dried up the juices of your body, and sucked
54 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
the life blood out of every generous emotion ? You, you old mummy, what
have you ever done in the world or for it? Had mankind all been like
you we should still have clung to our primitive fig-leaves and war-clubs;
which latter, you know, are very practical things.
"Steamboats, railroads, telegraphs, gas-lights, where would they all have
been, but for those troublesome Idealists whom you facetiously call shiftless
fellows, and abuse so mercilessly?
" Whence came those steamboats which have enriched you, those rail
roads covering our entire extent of country with a network of iron; the
telegraph with its lightning messengers of intelligence ; the free schools
educating at public expense every child in the land ; those daily news
papers spreading before us at morning and evening news from every
quarter of the globe ? Ask Robert Fulton, and John Fitch, and Guttenberg,
and Morse, quiet thinkers only, what hand they have had in these great
features of the age. Long, long before these had material existence, they
were ideas in the minds of these men ; ideas, the results of days and nights
of anxious thought and study, and experiment continued under discourage
ment and reproach, and the fierce struggle for existence from day to day ;
mere ideas, projects only, and many a practical man like yourself, engaged
in the legitimate business of banking or merchandise, calling these very
men crazy, and some of the more kindly hearted ones pitying them sincerely
for these unfortunate aberrations of reason. But further still than this ; the
ideas which these men inventors have turned to such practical account, in
many instances, originated hundreds of years before them in the mind of
some poor, famishing author.
"This idea thrown out upon the world at a time of intellectual barren
ness took no deep root and hardly survived the unfruitful soil in which it
was first planted or the chilling winds to which it was originally exposed ;
still it lived until some mind which could appreciate its value and properly
estimate its importance, breathed new life into its decaying spirit and
clothed its spiritual form with robes of materiality, and thus the seed, which
the poor author in want and sorrow and neglect had sown, long years
after his mind had ceased to act, and his name had become forgotten
amongst men, produced its legitimate results in great practical benefits to
mankind, for whose good he had so zealously and self-denyingly labored.
"The most damaging error, however, of the Ultra-Utilitarian rests on his
mistaking the means for the end. If our civilization of which we boast so
highly, consists merely in our increased and enlarged abilities to make
money, it is most certainly a bad bargain when we consider the self-inde
pendence and freedom which we have given in exchange ; it is not worth
the possessing : But all those magnificent achievments of human science/
and investigation, so distinctive of modern civilization, tend to much higher
and nobler purposes. Their legitimate object is to increase the happiness
of mankind, to alleviate his sufferings, to enlarge and liberalize his industry,
to better and purify his heart. To these results should all human endeavor
be directed, and he who in any way contributes to this end is indeed a
public benefactor.
THREE EARLY LITERARY GEMS. 55
"The mere fact that I possess money, of itself renders me none the
happier ; the only pleasure I can derive from it consists in the uses to
which it may be applied. The rich man who uses his wealth in alleviating
and relieving human sorrow and misery, who feeds the hungry, clothes the
naked, enlightens the darkened mind, assists the unfortunate, cheers and
encourages the depressed in spirit, or enlarges and cultivates his own
understanding, is indeed one of the happiest of men, but his wealth is
only the means by which it is secured.
"The accumulation of dollars, is not then the great end and aim of
human existence. If it were so, our literature need consist of nothing more
than ledgers and books of account, counterfeit bank-note detectors or
biographies of eminent showmen. If it were so, all those kindly and
gentle emotions dignifying and exalting human nature would be utterly
extinguished, the voice of compassion and the wail of sorrow would be
drowned in their din of trade and the clamor of traffic, the hand of charity
would be forever closed ; reason, the divinest attribute of man, would be made
the servant of the hard task-master ; wealth, chained to factory wheels,
sunk to mere instinct, would leave the wide and glorious fields of human
thought and investigation untrodden. No more would pity find a place
within the bosom of man, melting and subduing with her gentle pressure
his cold, hard heart. Imagination, shorn of her wings and stripped of her
heaven-derived attributes, would plume herself for no further flights. The
gentle spirit of Poesy, chilled by the cold contact of figures, would be
frighted from the face of the earth by long files of belligerent Statistics,
clad in arms and armour of solid facts ; or venturing here perhaps too long
would be crushed beneath huge volumes of accounts current and buried at
last in a patent salamander safe, with a ledger for its headstone and a day
book at its feet, and would be secured in its last honors by one of Hobb's
inimitable locks.
"You have done much, you practical men with your keen sagacity, your
business tact, your calculating minds, your large enterprises, your ceaseless
activity for the good of mankind. You, too, although you may not know
it, have hearts within you that can be made to feel. Long years ago, when
still you were lingering in the broad, bright galleries of youth, with its
beautiful visions spread out so clearly before you, you despised all base and
sordid motives, you longed but for fame, the fame of being great and good ;
you lingered yet long over the record of those great names which have
endeared themselves to the world ; you desired to ransack and explore every
department of human knowledge, to vindicate right and justice and truth
wherever you found it, and you would then have condemned, not with the cool
circumspect manner of ycur later days, but with warm, impassioned and honest
denunciation, every act of wrong, no matter how exalted the source from
whence it came. Full well we know, that in the quiet of your own home, when
the shutters are all closed, when the restless spirit of trade has hushed itself to
sleep until the morrow's sun shall wake, and the shadows of the night fall
thickly upon you, your mind in its busy workings swiftly turns you out of the
highways of trade, out of the close and crowded temples which Mammon
56 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
has erected for its worshipers, back, back, back, over every step of that
long journey you once have traveled. You count again the mile-stones
which you so hurriedly passed ; as you proceed, less and less difficult
becomes the way ; you hear now, not very far away, the clear old melodies
which gladdened you in your boyhood ; breezes, loaded with the fragrance
of the clover and the honey-suckle, fan your feverish brow; at last you come
home upon that broad and beautiful country where youth with you once held
high festival; its clear pure air, its glorious and boundless extent, its numberless
beauties, charm and delight you. Memory — the kindliest agent of the human
mind — like the sunshine upon a distant mountain, hides in deep shadow every
rocky point, smooths every rough place, and brings into strong clear light
every spot of verdure and of green,
" You linger long upon that picture. Wealth you have, but what of that?
— wealth, wealth that cannot be counted and still your anxious and care
worn face ! the deep seams upon your forehead, the gray hairs scattered
over your temples, betray to us that your mind is ill, very ill at ease. You
think in your quiet now and ponder upon the lesson your past life has
taught ; you sigh and are sad over the retrospect ; and the bright and
glorious days of your youth, how you wish they might return ; the dear
friends of that olden time who loved with a devotion, which in your later
days you have never experienced — they too are all gone : Father, mother,
brother, sister, wife, children — all gone, and such complete control has the
fierce demon of business held, that until now you had long since ceased to think
of them ; and now you count your gains and feel that there is still some
thing immeasurably superior to all your hoarded wealth ; you feel that in
exchanging purity of heart, loftiness of purpose, and the stern convictions
of right for the blandishments of wealth — a fearful bargain has been driven.
Full well we know that he, who by \<rhat he has written or uttered, excites
the passions for knowledge in the mind, enlarges our sympathies, betters
our hearts, corrects and purifies our desires, invests us with that Christian
courage which dares to do anything right and fears to do anything wrong, is
entitled to our lasting love and respect, and has nobly fulfilled his mission
upon earth. How we love to linger over the ground which these high-priests
of nature have made holy and sacred ; in the quiet of our study where blind
old Homer sings once more his inspired song ; where Byron, and Shakes
peare, and Milton, and all the great men of all ages past are guests at our
bidding, we feel our hearts inspired with new and higher purposes, we look
back upon that long line of great names which has cheered us in our sad
ness, enlightened us in our ignorance, guided by gentle and kindly influen
ces in our wayward wanderings and opened the heart to melting charities.
We see these great benefactors to their race, guiding lights in the sub
lime march of human improvement far, far in advance of that great'
host for whom they are laboring ; despised, ill-appreciated, persecuted
by ignorance and malice, struggling fiercely for subsistence — what now
would we give in exchange for the noble lessons these men have taught
and are every day teaching us?
"How full now is the measure of their fame! The sublime song of the
THREE EARLY LITERARY GEMS. 57
noble, blind and Puritan poet, even across the gulf of years, wakes its echo
in every heart. Bacon, the politician is no more, but Bacon the thinker,
Bacon the author, standing far in advance of the times in which he lived,
seeing with his clear eye, and embracing with his great mind every depart
ment of human knowledge, will be a household word, when the monarch
to whom he cringed will be forgotten. And dear and cherished in every
heart, shall be the memory of thee, thou gentle, good, generous, whole-
souled, wayward Oliver Goldsmith ; bright upon Glory's column is thy name
inscribed, and tenderly in every heart which loves its kind shall thy memory
be cherished! And while we reverence so highly the great departed ones
from whose examples and teachings we may all learn to be wiser and
better, we should not pass over in silence the thinker, the author of our
own times. We must not content ourselves with venerating the names that
have preceded us, nor yet in writing praises upon their tombstones, but
by active exertion strive to render ourselves worthy descendents of such
noble ancestry. Because there were giants in those days, it can certainly
be no good reason that we should be all dwarfs and Lilliputians in these
days. Because they were great and good and pure, this is no reason that
we should be small and base and mean. The destiny of the human race
is progressive, and we have all the learning of all who have preceded us
as a beginning for ourselves. The Idealist of every kind has his mission
and his proper sphere of action ; the Utilitarian his. Let all, then, use the
past as a solemn teacher. Act in the grand present with its teeming pro
jects, worthily and honestly, and thus secure success in the future.
" Standing just upon the threshold of another year, with the traces which
the past have left of sorrow, and joy, and warning still fresh before us,
begin it with high and pure resolve. Remember, Oh poet and philosopher
and thinker, that the business of this life is stern and real, the field is the
earth, and its good is immortality. Train, then, your genius, to the high
purpose of benefiting your fellow-man. Be an active, earnest soldier in
this great battle of life, and even here for you shall Fame blow her loudest
trumpet. Look backward upon the past with all its solemn warnings,
its gay rejoicings, its striking contrast of pageant and parade and sorrow
and distress, of hope buoyant and bright, of disappointment and despair,
of errors and repentance; and forward to the solemn future in which we
are called to act. Think, Oh ye practical men of the world, full of its
schemings and its plans, bounteously blessed with wealth, think of the
solemn purposes of life. Despise not the fairer feelings of our nature ;
scorn not those who seek to excite them to action. Hear the cry for help,
coming from the distressed and bleeding heart, which rises above the noise
and tumult of our active life and never ceases. Hear, and hearing, heed.
Out of thine abundance, turn sorrow into gladness and misery into
lightness of heart. Learn lessons of wisdom, not only from the experiences
of your own life, but from the recorded experience of the lives of others.
Despise not books, for they are the treasured greatness of all the ages.
Nobly indeed has it been said by him in whom met all that is good, both
in the ideal and practical, the puritan warrior and the sublimest of poets :
58 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
' Books are not absolutely dead things, but do contain a progeny of life in
them to be as active as that soul was whose progeny they are ; nay, they
do preserve as in a vial the purest efficacy and extraction of that living
intellect that bred them. I know they are as lively and as vigorously pro
ductive as those fabulous dragon's teeth which being sown up and down
may chance to spring up armed men, and yet on the other hand unless
wariness be used, as good almost kill a man as kill a good book ; who
kills a man kills a reasonable creature, God's image ; but he who destroys
a good book, kills reason itself; kills the image of God as it were in the
eye. Many a man lives a burden to the earth, but a good book is the
precious life-blood of a master-spirit embalmed and treasured up on pur
pose to a life beyond life.' "
CHAPTER III.
WRITING FOR THE PRESS.
1854—1857.
LITERARY CONTRIBUTIpNS TO THE BUFFALO NEWSPAPERS — AMERICAN MAGA
ZINES THIRTY YEARS AGO — SOUTHERN LITERATURE — AN HISTORICAL CURI
OSITY—REVIEW OF THE LIFE OF GENERAL CASS— BENTON's "THIRTY
YEARS IN THE UNITED STATES SENATE" — A PROPHETIC FORECAST OF THE
OUTCOME OF THE SLAVERY AGITATION.
AS early as 1854, Mr. Storrs was contributing to the press
literary articles of considerable merit, as a means of util
izing the leisure intervals which — though not so in his case —
most young lawyers find come too often while waiting the devel
opment of professional practice. The columns of the Buffalo
Commercial Advertiser contained several of his productions, and
one in particular, being a review of the current magazine litera
ture of the day, is so ably written that an extract from it will
be read with interest by all who knew Mr. Storrs in the zenith
of his fame. It shows also of what different stuff the magazines
of that time were made up from those of the present day.
" No class of publications," he says in an article in this paper, dated March
n, 1854, "outside the daily press, occupies a more important position than
magazines in the literature of the day. Filled with articles of general interest
upon topics which occupy the public mind for the time being, flavored with
the spices of variety, placed before the people in a cheap and attractive form,
they are read with avidity, and enjoy a wide spread and large circulation.
A magazine can therefore be made productive of much good or of great evil,
according as its tone and style are healthful, sound and pure, or corrupt and
baneful. Finding their way into the hands of the young, their essays are read
with more attention than newspaper articles receive, and make a more lasting
impression than is caused by lengthy reviews and tales. Remembering these
59
6O LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
facts, we regard as a misfortune the existence of so many sickly, trashy maga
zines in this country. At present we are surfeited with such publications.
Every city of any size must now have its magazine, as necessarily as its daily
paper. In consequence a flood of periodicals is poured forth over the land,
miserably edited, foisting upon the world the crude notions of inexperienced
men, and lowering instead of elevating the standard of literary taste. They
are made the repository of ' prize tales' and mawkish poetry, and their attrac
tion is heightened by colored plates of fashions or trumpery illustrations. As
they make their monthly appearance, newspaper after newspaper heralds their
coming with a puff, and aids in extending a circulation which can only prove
injurious to the public. It is time that the press should refrain from bepraising
all such trash, and should in their notices of literary periodicals discriminate
between the good and the bad."
Among the worst of the magazines of that day he reckoned
Godey's Lady's Book, Sartairis, and Grahauis. The Knicker
bocker he considered only a shade better. " The principal con
tributors for these publications," he said, "are young gentlemen
and ladies who are desirous of seeing their effusions in print;
who imagine that to write poetry, it is only necessary that they
should rhyme ; who have read Byron, Moore, and other modern
poets ; who are enraptured with Willis and dote upon Morris, and
are seized with an attack of inspiration which they spend through
the pages of a magazine."
Harper s, being then mostly made up of selections from Eng
lish magazines, was better than the ones above mentioned, but
still did not come up to Mr. Storrs' standard. " Where this rule
is departed from," he says, " the matter is pretty certain to be
bad, as is very well evidenced in the effort of Mr. Abbott to
sanctify Napoleon, and the sentimentalisms of Mr. T. Addison
Richards. Harper s is got up with an especial reference to the
dollar ; the best articles in it, being stolen, cost nothing, and the
wood-cuts and illustrations from PiuicJi tend in no slight degree
to extend its circulation. The selections are generally made with
but little judgment ; they are such as we all have read, or have
had an opportunity of reading where they originally appeared,
and on the whole it is quite surprising that so big a book can
be so useless."
He commended Littell s Living A^e because its selections from
o c>
other magazines were judiciously made. The best American
magazine of that day, according to Mr. Storrs, was Putnam's
Monthly. " The first number of this really excellent periodical,"
WRITING FOR THE PRESS. 6 1
he says, " was cheering to those who had been for so long a
time sickened by the stuff so extensively patronized among us,
and inspired a hope that something in the magazine department
might be produced in our country worthy of the talent that is in
it. The result has been gratifying "in the extreme. A series of
able and well considered articles has appeared in this magazine,
establishing beyond a doubt the fact that America is able to sus
tain a periodical comparing favorably with many of the most
respectable of the Scotch and English reviews. The increasing
popularity of Blackwood and Putnam in this country is an uner
ring indication, not only that a great number of our citizens possess
sound literary taste, but also that we have talent among us, which,
if properly cultivated and directed, may achieve great and bene
ficial results in the world of letters."
To the Buffalo Daily Republic, May 8, 1857, he contributed an
article on " Southern Literature," which is here given in full, not
alone because of the ability with which it is written, but also
because the literature which it embalms has now become an his
torical curiosity :
" Notwithstanding all the doubts that had been expressed upon that subject,
there is a Southern literature. It is a literature differing from any other upon
the face of the civilized globe — unquestionably original ; formed upon no
models now known amongst men ; having no traits in common with any
other of which we now have knowledge ; striving after none of those objects
to the attainment of which other kinds of literature are devoted ; and based
upon none of those ideas which have given character and life to all pre
vious literary productions.
" This Southern literature, so remarkable in all its characteristics, derives
its inspiration from the ' peculiar institution ' with which the sunny South
alone is now blessed ; and the cause from which its inspiration is derived
determines its character, and is a very correct index of its merits. The
institution of slavery is democratic, and therefore Southern literature is
democratic. The institution of slavery is conservative, and therefore South
ern literature is conservative. The institution of slavery is a Christian insti
tution, deriving its sanctions and existence from the Bible, supported and
sustained by all pious, good, and devout men, from the Apostle Paul
down to the present time, and therefore Southern literature is Christian-
like, pious, meek, gentle, and long-suffering. The institution of slavery is
a republican institution, and therefore Southern literature is republican, and
watches with great care the interests of our government, and strives to its
uttermost to spread republican doctrines. The institution of slavery is a law
and order institution, and therefore Southern literature respects the law and
seeks to preserve order. The institution of slavery is a humanitarian insti-
62 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
tution, and therefore Southern literature is humanitarian; sheds barrels of
tears over the miseries of a free society ; feels dreadfully for the sufferings
of the Irish, the Coolies, the pauper population of Europe, English opera
tives, and in fact for everybody that is not as happy, and fat, and con
tented as themselves and their slaves.
"What a nice literature! How strange it is that it has so long hid its
light under a bushel ; what a proof of the perversity of the human intel
lect, of the obtuseness of our perceptions, that its merits have not been
earlier discovered !
"It is to us a source of exceeding great pleasure to be able to lay before
our readers the proofs of the correctness of the position which we have
taken. Mr. J. D. B. De Bow is the editor of the Review, published
monthly in New Orleans and Washington, called De Bow s Review, adapted
primarily to the Southern States of the Union, and which is the principal
exponent of Southern sentiment, and the chief channel through which
Southern literature publishes itself to an admiring world. The April
number is now before us, and abounds with these striking features which
we have before mentioned. The article which more particularly attracts
our attention is entitled ' The Conservative Principle ; or, Social Evils and
their Remedies.' The writer is manifestly a very patriotic gentleman. He
has, as the editor informs us, ' prepared and published several valuable
works, among them a late one, entitled ' Cannibals All, or Slaves without
Masters,' which have for their aim a defense of slavery from a higher
standpoint.' This patriotic gentleman was, as a matter of course, sorely
frightened at the largeness of the Republican vote at the late Presidential
election, and in opening his article he says: — 'The Republican majority in
the House of Representatives, and the large sectional vote obtained by
Fremont, are facts which, taken alone, suffice to show that our Union is
imperiled. As the danger becomes more imminent, the thoughtful, the
prudent, and the patriotic should combine more closely, and redouble their
efforts to avert it ; for none but the rash, the thoughtless, and the wicked
can look with indifference to an event so pregnant with consequences, for
weal or woe, not only to Americans, but to all civilized mankind.' Cer
tainly not, and the larger the Republican majority the more imminent is
the danger, and thoughtful and prudent and patriotic men ought to com
bine at once to put a stop to it.
" Having stated the dangers which so closely environ us, we are informed
how all these dangers may be averted. ' The slavery principle is common
ground, on which conservatives, north and south, may combine, and from
which they may assail abolition and socialism, defend and preserve the
Union, protect the sanctity of marriage, secure private property, maintain
parental authority, and conserve all other institutions.' Probably very
many of our readers have a lingering idea that our present system of Gov
ernment is based upon a broad and great principle, that of human equality ;
that its purpose was to secure to every one the full and free enjoyment of
life, liberty, and property ; that its founders regarded self-government as the
WRITING FOR THE PRESS. 63
surest means by which these results were to be obtained, and that the
preservation of the Union formed for these purposes depended upon the
complete and thorough recognition of the principle of equal rights, from
which its existence was derived. But we have happily reached a much
more enlightened position than that occupied by the fathers of the republic.
To establish universal freedom upon this continent we must keep millions
in bondage. To secure equal rights to all we must deprive an entire class of
all rights whatever. To preserve a government formed for the purpose of
securing equality of privileges we must unite upon a principle which denies
the possible existence of any such equality. The institution of slavery
threatens the existence of the Union, and therefore instead of restricting it
within its present limits, conservatives should unite to extend and perpetuate
it. Among slaves, marriage has no sanctities, property no rights, parents
no authority, and therefore the slavery principle is common ground upon
which we can all unite in order to protect the sanctity of marriage, secure
private property, and maintain parental authority. The institution of
slavery is at war with and repugnant to all other civilized institutions, and
therefore upon the slavery principle should we all unite ' to conserve all
other institutions.'
"Very clear and plain indeed. The logic, to be sure, would not work
under Whately, would not pass muster in schools, — it scorns and tramples
upon all precedents — in short, it is unqualifiedly original ; it is a Southern
institution in its very highest manifestation. Very many stupid people will
yet unquestionably have their doubts, but with ' the thoughtful, the prudent,
and the patriotic,' the old order of things will be entirely reversed, and t-o-p
will spell bottom.
"Thus much for the logic of Southern literature ; and now for its philoso
phy. Society is of itself the practical assertion that man has property in
man. He cannot live alone. By mere force of nature, by intuitive neces
sity, the strong protect and control the weak, the weak serve and obey the
strong ; but the property in each case is mutual. The husband is, by
nature as well as law, master of wife and children, and bound to provide
for, protect and govern them ; they are his property, but he is equally theirs.
This is the germ and nucleus of all government, and of all property of
man in man.' Society has heretofore been considered as a compact, an
agreement, by which certain rights or privileges were recognized, certain
duties enforced, and as altogether voluntary and mutual in its origin. We
do not profess any acquaintance with the law, but we confess being
somewhat startled by the doctrine that the wife is the property of the
husband. We have never yet heard of an instance of a husband pawn
ing his wife,— mortgaging her,— turning her out as a collateral, or get
ting a discount on her ; but when this philosophy comes to be more
generally understood, such instances will no doubt be frequent. But then,
the husband is equally the property of his wife. This philosphy would
apply remarkably well to African slavery, if the same reciprocity existed.
It would all work very well indeed if the negro had the same power
to sell the master that the master has to sell the negro. The 'germ
64 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS:
and nucleus of our government ' has hitherto been understood to be human
equality, but Southern literature, with its remarkable keenness, has dis
covered that it is the principle that 'man has property in man.' We must
reconcile ourselves to this doctrine. Wisdom has uttered it ; let no man
attempt to gainsay it.
" But it must not be understood that the writer of this remarkable article
is theoretical merely. The black Republican party is a live, large fact, a
stubborn one, and it must be met ; and the manner in which it is to be
met will recommend itself to every practical mind. ' To meet the issues as
now tendered by the black Republicans, conservatives are compelled to
maintain that slavery in the abstract is right. Negro slavery is not profita
ble or useful at the North, and the area and forms of white slavery should
not be increased while there is room in the unsettled portions of the earth
for free, laborers to become proprietors. This is the only common ground
on which we can meet, —the only way to save the Union, --to save religion,
marriage, property, government,— nay, society itself.' By and by, when we
get a little more crowded, white slavery must necessarily be established ;
but inasmuch as it is, on the whole, rather more agreeable to most men to
be proprietors than slaves, the good time will be deferred until government
land is taken up. Then the Union will be safe.
" The writer, with his usual sagacity, has discovered that something more
than the mere concession to this principle is necessary, and on that head
he says : ' But the recognition and adoption of this principle will avail us
naught, so long as we continue idle, indifferent, and passive. We must
imitate their zeal and activity. Our cause is a better one ; our numbers and
our means greater. We must meet agitation by counter-agitation ; propa-
gandism by counter-propagandism. We must support and establish presses,
deliver lectures, and write books and essays, to sustain the cause of gov
ernment against anarchy, of religion agaist infidelity, of private property
against agrarianism, and of female virtue and Christian marriage against
free love. We must invoke the strong, all-pervading arm of Christian com
mon law which our ancestry brought from England.' The South has
already built large cities, established flourishing commercial sea-ports, built
railroads, and diffused general intelligence by resolutions; and it will, no
doubt, find it very easy to establish and support presses in the same way.
"Thus far we have had the statement of the dangers which imperil the
Union, the theory of the true government, and the practical application of
the theory ; and it only now remains to state the results, which, it will be
seen, are truly magnificent. ' In vindicating negro slavery as one of the
established institutions of the country, and in aiding to perpetuate it, and
extend it into new territories, you will strengthen the Union and add pros
perity to the North. Slavery has ever been in reality the strongest, almost
the only bond of union between North and South. It begets diversity of
pursuits and of products, supplies markets, supports trade and manufactures,
occasions mutuality of dependence, and prevents undue rivalry and compe
tition between the two sections. In its absence our pursuits and products
would be similar, trade and intercourse would cease, the one would furnish
WRITING FOR THE PRESS. 65
no Inarket to the other section, competition and rivalries would arise, and a
useless and cumbrous Union would soon be dissolved. . Slavery makes
Europe dependent on us. We help greatly to feed and clothe her, and to
sustain her commerce and manufactures. Blot out negro slavery, and you
arrest the trade of the world, take away men's breakfast and supper,
reduce their dinners, and strip them of half their clothing.' Heretofore, we
have ascribed much of the material prosperity of our country to the dignity
of free labor. We know what it has accomplished. We know that it has
surmounted every obstacle ; that it has subdued the elements themselves ;
that the sterile and unproductive soil of New England, by it, has become
rich and fertile ; that it has built cities, felled forests, established schools,
and created a commerce the sails of which whiten every sea, the fibres of
which are interlaced with the fate of kingdoms. We know that prosperity
and refinement have always attended it ; that it has been to us the source
of that material and intellectual greatness of which we are so justly proud.
We know that it has filled our Territories with thriving and industrious
commundes ; developed thfeir resources ; made them rich, prosperous, and
powerful. To Southern literature was it left to discover that all these results
are as naught ; that the system of labor which has impoverished and worn
out a soil naturally productive and fruitful, which has suffered grass to
grow in the streets of cities, which, with every advantage in its favor, has a
commerce puny and weak, which resorts to violence and bloodshed as
the arbiter of disputes, which dethrones justice and substitutes the bludgeon
and the bowie-knife in its stead — should supersede free labor, be extended
into new territories, and degrade and destroy it.
" Certainly, the black Republicans, who vindicate free labor, and wish
success to it, are dangerous men. They must be met ; and, after the South
has established a few more presses, and written a few more books and
essays, 'the thoughtful, the prudent, and the patriotic,' North and South,
will find this blessed slavery principle common ground, upon which they
may all comfortably and happily combine. Peace be with them ! There is
not a particle of flunkey ism about them! certainly not!"
To the same paper, in March 1857, he contributed a review of
the " Life and Times of Lewis Cass," then just published. This
article is an excellent specimen of the caustic satire of which he
was so great a master. He ridicules the biographer's style in a
manner worthy of Macaulay's well known essay on Robert
Montgomery. A short extract will suffice here :
"This very remarkable book has been sadly neglected. We do not
recollect to have seen any notice 'whatever relating to it since its publica
tion. Having been published at about the same time as Prescott's • Philip
the Second,' Macaulay's fourth volume of the 'History of England,' and
Motley's 'Rise of the Dutch Republic,' it is altogether probable that Mr.
Smith's book was lost sight of in consequence of the very general attention
which the public bestowed upon these works. Literary justice is prover-
5
66 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
bially tardy in its coming, and tke proper appreciation of a writer's merits
is frequently postponed to a succeeding generation. This, we are appre
hensive, will on the whole be the fate of Mr. Smith.
"Our purpose more particularly is to call attention, first, to the fact that
such a book has been really published ; and secondly, to a few peculiarities of
the author's style. And first, the existence of a book entitled as above is
a positive matter of fact, which we can establish to the satisfaction of any
doubting individual by the production of the book itself. And now let us
listen to what Mr. Smith has to say, and see how he says it.
"Any criticism which we might be disposed to make upon the historical
accuracy of the book, any objections which we might be disposed to urge,
are foreclosed at the outset by the author himself, who informs us, on the
first page of the first chapter, — "The following pages will disclose to the
reader a minute and true history of the life and character of an eminent
citizen of the American republic." How much more quiet would pervade
the literary world were Mr. Smith's example generally followed. We know
now, that ''The Life and Times of General (Ass" is true, because Mr.
Smith says so. What a pity that Mr. Macaulay had not made a similar
statement in the opening of his "History of England;" what a vast deal of
angry discussions and sharp, excited criticism would have been saved thereby !
Quaker spirit would not then have been aroused as it has has been by
his attack" on Penn, and Scotchmen would have quietly and meekly sub
mitted to the drubbing which their ancestors have received at his hands.
"'In the village of Exeter, in the State of New Hampshire, may be seen
a small, unpretending wooden dwelling-house, which has withstood the
wear of the elements upwards of three quarters of a century.' Mr. Theoph-
ilus Gilman, in the year 1782, occupied that wooden dwelling-house, and
'on the ninth day of October, in that year, in this house, Lewis Cass was
born ! ' Ordinary historians would have said that Lewis Cass was born at
Exeter in the State of New Hampshire on the ninth day of October A. D.
1782, but this history is not only true but minute. He was born in a house,
and that house was not a barn nor a dry goods store, but a dwelling-
house ; it was small and unpretending, built of wood, and at that time Mr.
Theophilus Gilman occupied it ; and it is now on exhibition and may be
seen at Exeter, New Hampshire, by any individual who will take the
trouble to go there.
"Time and space will not permit us to follow the General through the
various stages of his military and political career, and as we stated at
the outset that our purpose was not to discuss any questions relating to
the historical accuracy of the book, but rather to call attention to the
peculiar manner in which it is written, we will content ourselves with, fur
nishing a few more quotations sufficiently pointed and peculiar to indicate
the general style of the author.
"At page 325, in speaking of the appointment of General Cass as Minister to
France, the author indulges in the following happy and suggestive remarks:
'He was now exchanging primeval solitudes, the haunts of the red man, and of
the animals his co-tenants of the forest, whom God had given him for his
WRITING FOR THE PRESS. 6/
•
support, for the highest state of improvement.' The idea that God gave to
General Cass Indians for his support, is, to say the least, somewhat startling.
"At page 368 the author says of General Cass : 'He was in Sidon situated on
the sea-coast and in a state of misery and decadence.1 Although the General
is now in a state of decadence, we had been accustomed to date its com
mencement from the year 1847. From this, however, it would appear that he
had been in a bad way much longer than was generally supposed.
" During his residence at the French Court, General Cass was charged
with being a courtier, a charge which the author thus conclusively
silences : — ' General Cass a courtier ! He who had paddled his canoe
thousands of miles on the lakes and rivers of the west ; he who had worn
his hunting shirt in company with the buffalo, cut his piece of venison steak
from the rib, and roasted it in the woods ! ' Mr. Smith is certain to
afford information upon every subject which he touches. Not only do we
learn here that General Cass was not a courtier, but a new and important fact
is developed in natural history. The buffalo, adopting the habits of civil
ized life, quite as easily and readily as the Indian, with wonderful sagacity
had perceived the many conveniences of a hunting shirt, had made it a
part of his wardrobe, and wore it in company with General Cass. The
Buffalo wore a hunting shirt ; General Cass wore a hunting shirt. The
buffalo is not a courtier ; therefore General Cass is not a courtier.
Q. E. D.
" General Cass, after an absence of twelve years, returned home. The
author feelingly says : ' Many of his old cherished neighbors and personal
friends had gone the way of all flesh ; some had removed farther west.'
We trust the author will be good enough, in his second edition, to give us
the exact geographical location of that country which is ' farther west ' than
'the way of all flesh.'
"This book, it must be remembered, is the first attempt of Mr. Smith in
this department of literature, and there is no telling what he may accom
plish in the future. In conclusion we will add, that if General Cass can
stand any further attempts on his life like the present one, he is a much
tougher old gentleman than we had supposed him to be."
His most elaborate journalistic effort, at this time, however,
was a review of Thomas H. Benton's "Thirty Years in the
United States Senate," which appeared in the Buffalo Daily
Republic of September 17, 1857. In that article he carefully
traced the whole history of the slavery agitation, which originated
at the South, and ripened finally into open rebellion in 1 86 1.
Mr. Benton's account of its inception is brief and pithy.
"The regular inauguration of this slavery agitation," he says, "dates from
the year 1835, but it had commenced two years before, and in this
way: Nullification and disunion had commenced in 1830 upon complaint
against protective tariff. That being put down in 1833, under President
Jackson's proclamation and energetic measures, was immediately substi-
68 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
tuted by the slavery agitation. Mr. Calhoun, when he went home from
Congress, in the spring of that year, told his friends that the South could
never be united against the North on the tariff question ; that the sugar
interest of Louisiana would keep her out, and that the basis of Southern
union must be shifted to the slave question. Then all the papers in his
interest, and especially one at Washington, dropped tariff agitation and
commenced upon slavery ; and, in two years, had the agitation ripe for
inauguration on the slavery question. And, in tracing this agitation to its
present stage, and to comprehend its rationale, it is not to be forgotten that
it is a mere continuation of old tariff disunion ; and preferred because
more available."
The Southern press, inspired by Mr. Calhoun, demanded
among other things that the abolitionists should be put down
by legislation in all the Northern States. Mr. Storrs reviews in
succession the various attempts made by Southern politicians to
force the extension of slavery into the Territories, and thus
vigorously and impressively sums up the whole agitation and its
inevitable consequences :
"In 1835, when the first agitation manifests and calls for a Southern con
vention, and invocation to unity and concert of action, came forth in the
Charleston Mercury, the cause of disunion was then in the abolition socie
ties established in some of the free States, and which these States were
required to suppress. Then came the abolition petitions presented in Con
gress ; then the mail transmission of incendiary publications ; then the
abolition of slavery in the District of Columbia ; then the abolition of the
slave trade between the States; then the exclusion of slavery from Oregon '»
then the Wilmot proviso ; then the admission of California with a free con
stitution. Each of these in its day was a cause of disunion, to be effected
through the instrumentality of a Southern convention, forming a sub-
confederacy, in flagrant violation of the Constitution, and effecting the
disunion by establishing a commercial non-intercourse with the free States.
After twenty years of agitation upon these points, they are all given up.
The Constitution and the Union were found to be a mistake from the
beginning, an error in their origin, and an impossibility in their future
existence, and to be amended into another impossibility, or broken up
at once.
"The history of slavery agitation, its origin and its purposes, is full of
instruction and warning. An agitation for which the North is not responsi
ble, owing its origin to the South, a patriotic Southerner at an early day
saw and regretted. Mr. Madison, in the year 1836, writing upon this
subject, charges the inauguration of the slavery agitation to Southern men.
'He,' says Mr. Benton, 'wrote with the pen of inspiration and the heart of
a patriot, and with a soul which filled the Union, and could not be
imprisoned in one half of it. He was a Southern man ; but his Southern
home could not blind his mental vision to the origin, design, and conse-
WRITING FOR THE PRESS. 69
quences of the slavery agitation.' That agitation has at last, we trust,
reached its culminating point ; the issue which Southern politicians have
so long sought to force upon us is at last distinctly and openly before the
people. Designing from the outset to make slavery extension the control
ling object of our government, or, failing in that, to dissolve the Union,
they have been so far successful in their main purpose, through the
assistance of Northern votes, secured by their oft repeated cries of disunion,
or by holding out to Northern representatives the allurements of office.
We have tried the experiment of abandoning the fundamental principles
upon which our institutions were established, the teachings of our fathers,
and their construction of the constitution ; the experiment has been most
alarming in its results.
"That compromise which every prominent man in the country but a few years
since regarded as sacred, which Democratic Presidents and Democratic party
leaders invoked us to preserve and continue, has been sacrificed to a modern,
Southern-slavery-extension constitutional construction, and all the evils which
were predicted as the result of disturbing that compromise we already ex
perience. Do we need any other or further proof that the purpose of Southern
politicians and their abettors at the North is to change the character of our
government, and to make slavery extension its leading element ? Recognizing
at first the right of Congress to legislate upon the question of slavery in the
Territories, when the exercise of that right would inure to their benefit, as in
the cases of the admission of Missouri and Texas ; then denying it, and claiming
it for the people of the Territories, as in the case of Oregon ; and lastly,
denying the right both of Congress and the people of the Territories, when
California asked for admission as a free State ; these dogmas were but a short
time since scouted and ignored by the very men who now sacrifice the peace,
the harmony, the existence of the government, in order to establish them. The
Democratic party has openly and distinctly adopted the very principle which
in 1848 it almost unanimously rejected. The Know-Nothing party in the South
adopts as a leading element in its political creed the extreme Calhoun doctrine
of no right anywhere to keep slavery out of free territory, and that the Consti
tution carries it with it and establishes it everywhere.
"Civil war and bloodshed in the Territories ; division and alienation of feeling
between sister States ; threats of disunion ; inability of the government to
protect its citizens ; quarrels and disgrace abroad ; these are the- legitimate,
the natural and necessary results, upon experiment, in adopting Southern
constitutional constructions, of our departure from the primary and palpable
intent and meaning of the Constitution itself. It is time now to pause,
before pursuing still farther this dangerous system of innovations which the
Democratic and Know-Nothing parties propose still to follow. By continuing
this dangerous system, results still more disastrous must follow. The
issue is unmistakable ; shall we bring the country back to the old sys
tem of policy, under which it so long prospered, which gave it its
strength at home and its dignity and character abroad, or shall we incorporate
into it the doctrine of slavery propagandism, which must result in its
overthrow ?
7<D LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
"These are solemn questions; let every man put them to himself. He
will see at once that the present Republican party is eminently conser
vative ; that it reposes on those great principles which the fathers of the
republic cherished, under which the country prospered ; that it construes
the Constitution to operate nationalizing freedom, and conferring the power
upon Congress to do it. The storm which this modern policy has raised
is already beyond the control of its authors. The fire which they have so
recklessly kindled will consume them. "They have sown the wind ; they
will reap the whirlwind."
CHAPTER IV.
• •
THE KANSAS TROUBLES.
1858.
MR. STORKS' FIRST POLITICAL SPEECH, DELIVERED IN CATTARAUGUS COUNTY,
NEW YORK — AN EFFORT WORTHY OF HIS BEST DAYS — THE KANSAS QUES
TION DISCUSSED — PRESIDENT BUCHANAN'S MESSAGE — THE DRIFT OF THE
DEMOCRACY — TRUCKLING TO THE SOUTH — MR. STORRS PREDICTS HOW IT
WILL END.
T HAVE always been a Republican," said Mr. Storrs in a
I
speech delivered in Horticultural Hall, Philadelphia, in the
fall of 1880. "The Lord was very good to me, and postponed
my birth so late that I had never had occasion to vote the
Democratic ticket. I voted first for John C. Fremont. I kept
straight at it ever since, voting the Republican ticket."
Two years after he cast his first vote, for the first candidate put in
nomination by the newly formed Republican party, Mr. Storrs,
addressed a mass meeting at Ellicottsville, Cattaraugus County,
New York State, October 19, 1858, in behalf of the Republican
candidates at the State election. In that speech he reviewed the
questions at issue between Republicans and Democrats, which
finally culminated in open war, and particularly the dispute on
the admission of Kansas as a State under Buchanan's administra
tion, which at that time was agitating the whole country. Those
who have heard Mr. Storrs' campaign speeches in his later years
only, will be surprised to find that even while yet a young man,
having only recently attained his legal majority, his first political
address of which there is any record is characterised by the
same maturity of thought, the same clear logic, and the same
pointed wit that marked the best efforts of his later life.
72 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
The germ of all true patriotism is love of home and the place
of birth. Mr. Storrs was always attached to his home in Catta-
raugus County, and proud to boast of belonging to it ; and Cattarau-
gus County was always proud of him, watched with parental interest
his career, and rejoiced over each of his legal and political tri
umphs. At the outset, Mr. Storrs said :
"It is always to me a source of peculiar pleasure to meet the citizens of
the County of Cattaraugus ; but it is particularly so on an occasion like the
present, when we are come together to discuss those political issues upon
the proper determination of which the present prosperity and future great
ness of the State and Nation depend. Wherever my residence may be,
Cattaraugus will always be home ; and I have watched, and shall continue
to watch with eager and delighted interest, its career of advancing pros
perity. I have lived long enough to see great changes worked in our
good old County. I have seen vast inroads made upon its magnificent
forests, and fields of waving grain and cultivated farms where once the
maple and the pine, standing like tall sentinels, shut out the sunshine from
the soil — its clear and swift-running streams now turning the wheels of busy
machinery — the locomotive whirling along the iron track the long and
heavy-freighted train — its academies and common schools second to none
in the State — the Genesee Valley canal, so long deferred, affording cheap
and easy transit for its products to the great commercial emporium, nearly
completed, — and its free and intelligent men asserting the supremacy of
right over all party and political ties, and carrying high and waving
proudly before them the banner of Republicanism. For all these evidences
of material and physical thrift and prosperity, as a son of Cattaraugus, I
have every reason to be proud of my old home ; but I am more particularly
so when I remember that in the glorious contest of 1856, in the rushing
tide of free and enlightened sentiment which swept through it, the Demo
cratic party was drifted high and dry on the bleak shores of political defeat
and clissappointment, and their once proud front dwindled down to a mere
squad of postmasters and their deputies.
" Once more we are called together for the discussion of political questions,
and soon shall we be called to act upon them. The action which we take
should be determined in the same manner we would determine any ques
tion of business interest ; and in politics as in everything else, we should
have a reason for the faith that is in us. Political parties, when honestly
organized, are intended simply to represent and if possible establish and
enforce the sentiments upon some particular political topics^which its mem
bers entertain. It was in this way and for these purposes that our parties
were in the early history of the country called into being ; the party itself
being subsidiary, — simply a means to an end ; the machinery/ so to speak,
by which certain results were to be attained. A party, properly so called,
no more consists in its name than a man in his pantaloons. If upon the
question of a re-charter of the United States liank I should oppose such
re-charter, and should act with a party holding the same views I did upon
THE KANSAS TROUBLES. 73
that question, this could certainly be no reason why upon another and
newer question, raised after the settlement of the former, upon which the
same party held directly opposite views to my own, I should act with them
also. That would be inconsistency, and the only kind of political inconsis
tency. Politics in this light becomes a science ; something more than a con
temptible squabble for power and its emoluments. Voting, too', when the
vote represents an idea, is the most dignified and solemn act a freeman can
be called upon to perform. A vote, then, is a live thing ; and who can
doubt that in 1856 every Republican vote cast 'shrieked for freedom'? All
we have to do at this election is simply to satisfy ourselves what the issues
are which are now presented to us, and what political organization embo
dies and reflects our sentiments upon them. The questions involved in the
present election are State and National. In that order I propose to consider
and discuss them with you, candidly, fairly, courteously."
He then discussed the questions of State politics which were
uppermost at that time, among them the bill making an appro
priation for the enlargement of the Erie canal, which the Repub
licans supported, but which, on an appeal by the Democrats, was
decided by the New York Court of Appeals to be unconstitu
tional. Turning to national politics, he said :
"Those great issues for which we battled in 1856 are by no means
settled or ended, and the result of the present election in this State is to
exercise an important influence in their proper determination. It is quite
unnecessary, I apprehend, for me to dwell at any length upon the earlier
history of the Kansas troubles. Suffice it to say that in the election of
1856, the principle contended for by the Democratic party, and claimed to
be a part of the Democratic platform, was ' Popular Sovereignty,' and
that, by the prophets of the party at the North, was said to mean the
right of the people of Territories acting in their territorial capacity to deter
mine for themselves whether they would or would not have slavery in the
Territories. We, as Republicans, claimed that this platform would be dif
ferently construed, so as to deprive either the people of the Territories, or
Congress, of the right to determine that question. We further claimed that
Congress had the right to legislate upon this question, and should exercise
the right. The great practical end to be attained was the freedom of
Kansas. We were beaten. Popular sovereignty seemed to be the settled
policy of the country. It was, at all events, the principle upon which Mr.
Buchanan was elected, and all we could then do was to ask that the prin
ciple established by his election should be faithfully and fairly carried out.
How were we met? First by the dictum of the Supreme Court, placing
upon the Constitution the very construction which we as a party claimed
would be put upon it, blowing the doctrine of popular sovereignty to atoms,
and carrying slavery affirmatively into the Territories. This doctrine, so
much at war with the past policy of the country, was forthwith made a
test of Democracy. The infamous Lecompton swindle was sought to be
74 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
forced upon the people of Kansas. Failing in that, and using the entire
power of the government to accomplish the object, the English bill was
pushed through, approaching the people of Kansas with a sword in one
hand and a purse in the other, — permitting them to come in as a slave
State with less than one-half the population required for her admission as a
free State. The people of Kansas rejected, with an overwhelming majority,
this mercenary and contemptible proposition, and now to-day we stand,
this Kansas question no nearer settled than ever, and the victories of 1856
profitless and fruitless, unless followed up by like success in 1858.
" Kansas will probably apply for admission as a State this coming winter,
and then comes 'the tug of war.' Then is to be settled the final ques
tion whether she shall be admitted with her present population as a free
State, contrary to the provisions of the English bill.
'' Now in view of these facts, who is there so stupid or so blind as to
call the Kansas question settled ? It is a favorite remark of the Democracy
that ' Kansas is played out/ when, as you see, the fact is that if settled at
all it is settled against us, Kansas to-day being by the action of the Supreme
Court a slave Territory. Whether she shall be a free State remains yet to
be determined, and until the last act of her admission into the Union with
a free constitution is consummated, until this modern Democracy, which has
done more to debauch public sentiment upon those great principles upon
which the government is established than all other political organizations
put together, is overthrown, every Republican who in the least degree relaxes
his energy or moderates his zeal is guilty of treason to the cause which he
has espoused.
" Mr. Buchanan is kind enough in his message to say that we have had
enough of this Kansas business, and that it is high time that it was stopped,
and the attention of the people called to more important business. We
quite agree with our venerable chief-magistrate. It is high time that the
Kansas troubles were stopped. It is high time that the Kansas agitation
was ended ; but of one thing Mr. Buchanan and his followers may rest well
assured, that the Kansas business will not be stopped, the Kansas agitation
will not cease, until the causes which have produced it cease also. When
gentlemen undertake to sow wind, they may safely calculate to reap a tol
erably large crop of whirlwind ; and when the Kansas troubles and the
agitation consequent upon them are ended, Mr. Buchanan and his
party will be ended also, and, following the President's advice, the
people will then turn their attention to 'more important matters.' One thing
is certain, that to the Democratic party the Kansas question has proved a
most unfortunate .operation — a speculation quite as disastrous as that recorded
in the early history of our race, when Adam and Eve went into the fruit
business together.
"In the course of the present campaign, how have these new questions
been treated by our Democratic friends? Many of you have had the
pleasure of listening, this fall, to Mr. Seymour, one of the ablest men in
the ranks of the Democratic party in this State. Did he have anything to
THE KANSAS TROUBLES. 75
say about Lecompton, the English bill, the coming application for the
admission of Kansas, or about your State policy? Not at all; he left the
subject at the Pyramids. After a fine salutatory to the Atlantic cable,
which, by the way, is not running for Governor, and is as difficult to get
an answer from as a Democratic politician, he gives a learned definition of
the word 'slave,' its aspect under the Romans, and Solomon's opinion
about it. Solomon was undoubtedly a wise and worthy gentleman, but we
submit that he is not to be taken as authority upon our canal policy or
the Kansas question. Would it not be safe for our Democratic friends to
come down to later dates? Let them, by all means, venture as far as the
discovery of the continent, and in 1860 we will meet them at the landing
of the Puritans.
"Gentlemen, I have the profoundest respect for a Democratic Conven
tion. I would as soon think of speaking disrespectfully of the Equator or
the North Pole as of a Democratic platform. I know that Democratic
Conventions have heretofore done a great many strange and curious things.
I know that they are able to do so again. I acknowledge reverently the
power of a Democratic resolve. The feats of the India rubber man, of
the ground and lofty tumbler, or of the man that swallows the sword,
although calculated to excite wonder, are tame and spiritless when compared
with the feats accomplished by the Western State Democratic Convention in
the year of grace 1858. As proofs, let facts be submitted to a candid
world."
Mr. Storrs here read the resolutions in the Democratic plat
form on the administration, and on Kansas, and added :
" It must be confessed these resolutions open most amiably. Cagger and
Richmond are ' content that the American people should judge the admin
istration of James Buchanan by its acts.' With this kind permission, the
American people will proceed to do that very thing, and it is to be hoped
that Cagger and Richmond are contented with the manner in which that
administration has been judged by the people of Pennsylvania, Ohio,
Indiana, and Iowa. They, foolish people, have not yet done shrieking for
freedom.
"We are further told that the administration of James Buchanan has
'confirmed the faith of the people in the enduring JJnion of the States.'
It has, indeed ; for if the people of this country can live through such an
administration, any other afflictions they could bear with equanimity and
composure.
" Secondly, they resolve ' that the settlement of the Kansas question by
the vote of the inhabitants of the Territory has removed that subject from
Congress.' We have yet to learn that it is settled. We know that the
inhabitants of the Territory, under the Democratic creed, are denied the
right of settling it. We know that the subject is only removed from Con
gress when Congress is not in session, and that next winter it will be
promptly on hand to trouble its inventors. A crab was defined by a scien
tific gentleman to be an animal that walked backwards, turned red when
76 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
boiled, and shed its legs in the winter. A French savant said that the
definition was correct, with three exceptions, namely, the crab did not walk
backwards, did not turn red when boiled, and did not shed its legs in the
winter. But the coolest portion of the resolve is yet to come, and it pro
ceeds to assert that the settlement of the- Kansas question has left the future
disposition of its internal affairs to its own people, subject only to the Con
stitution of the United States. Gentlemen, the dodge, 'subject only to the
Constitution of the United States,' we have learned. We were caught there
once ; that was the fault of the Democratic party. If we are caught again,
it will be our fault. Every Democratic platform has a peculiar, distinguish
ing mark, by which it can everywhere be recognized. There are some men
whose business is advertised in their countenances. We can always recog
nize a quack doctor, a Jew peddler, and a Democratic Member of Assembly
at first sight.
" Our Democratic friends seem to derive great consolation from the
reflection that they are conservative ; but that is not what ails them.
'A great many good people,' said that brilliant and witty English
divine, Sydney Smith, ' think they are pious, when they are only bilious.
Many a young gentleman turns down his shirt collar, retires from the
world in disgust, reposes himself on the banks of some murmuring
stream, and thinks that he is a misanthrope and a poet, when his
stomach is only out of order. Many a man thinks he is inspired when
he is simply dyspeptic, and many a worthy old gentleman puts his
hands loftily under his coat tails, spreads out his feet, stands with his
back to the fire, and thinks he is a conservative when he is only a
flunkey.' We have a large number of these illustrious ghosts, long since
politically entombed by the people, whose principal business seems to be
that of saving the Union ! Every question of interest to them seems
bristling with danger. They have any number of medicines and pre
scriptions for it, they sit up with it nights, preserve it by Union-saving
committees, and are constantly on the ground with their glue-pots at
Mason and Dixon's line to stick the Union together. Whenever any
question having the remotest relation to the institution of slavery is
broached, these solemn old doctors are clamorous in their cries of dan
ger to the Union ; and when, at the ensuing session of Congress, Kansas
shall knock at the door of the confederacy and demand admission as a
free State, you will see them running for their medicaments, and their
cordials, their paregoric and catnip, their laudanum and pennyroyal ; a
nigger will be in the question, and the Union in danger!"
His denunciation of the " mugwumps" of those days was as
vigorous and scorching as anything he ever uttered about the
same class of people in subsequent campaigns.
"Prominent among these so-called conservatives is the sage of.Bingham-
ton, the venerable Daniel S. Dickinson. It is, perhaps, unkind, by word or
deed, to add to the griefs of Daniel. Thrust without ceremony from the
doors of the State Convention, he has strong claims upon our sympathy.
He comes to his party in his grief, and says ;
KANSAS TROUBLES. 77
f
1 Pity the sorrows of a poor old man,
Whose trembling limbs have brought him to your door ;
His days have dwindled to the shortest span,—
Oh, give relief, and Heaven will bless your store!'
" It is all of no avail ; he asks for bread, Peter gives him a stone. Mr.
Dickinson and men of that class seem to be impressed with the idea that
whenever they, are driven from political life, all political vitality and
advancement cease. They stand waiting on the banks of the stream for
the water to run by, — making no more progress than a blind ass in a
bark mill. Mr. Dickinson is mistaken. Ever since his retirement to the
quiet of his native village, the world has been going right on ; the
order of nature has not been changed ; and I will venture to remark that
should Mr. Dickinson never hold office again, the seasons would still
come and go in their natural course. We should have snow in February
and hot weather in August, and Thanksgiving some time in November, as
usual.
"No class of men are more disposed in some respects to follow
scriptural injunctions than the conservatives. Let their Southern brethren
ask for their coat ; they will straightway not only give them that but their
hats, vests, and the balance of their wardrobe also. Do they ask for
Kansas? Take that, Minnesota, Oregon if possible, and a few other small
Territories by way of remembrance. Gentlemen, haven't we had about
enough of this spirit of flunkeyism? Isn't it about time for us to be men, true
to ourselves, true to those great principles upon which our government is
based, and for once let conscience and judgment go together? Be assured
that in the long run the right side is the expedient side, and must ulti
mately triumph. If the experiment of being men does not succeed, we can
relapse again into flunkeyism. We have had long experience at it, have
given it a fair trial ; it has signally and disastrously failed.
His conclusion was prophetic :
" We are asked where we are coming out. That is not a question
for us to answer ; it is sufficient for us to go in right, and trust in a
good Providence to bring us out right. When a man goes in at the
wrong gate, it is asking altogether too much of Providence by some
special interposition to bring him out at the right. ' I will,' said the
Mussulman, 'unloose my camel, and commit him to God.' 'First hitch
your camel,' said Mahomet, ' and then commit him to God.'
"The Democratic party seems to have a holy horror of agitation.
What other or better way is there for a free people to arrive at correct
conclusions on any given subject, than by a full discussion of it ?
Agitation is as necessary in the political as in the moral or physical world.
The darkest periods in this world's history are those in which free discus
sion was prevented. No great reform has ever yet been effected without it,
and it sometimes requires the earthquake to upheave to the surface the ores
of truth from under the layers of ignorance and falsehood which had
covered them. When the atmosphere in our still and 'sultry summer days is
78 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
charged with malaria and pestilence, the Almighty sends the thunder-storm,
and the rain, and the whirlwind, and in the commotion of the elements
which follows the air is cleansed and purified, and we can breathe again
with safety. If necessary, by such means must our present choked and
pestilential political atmosphere be purified ; and as a free people, wherever
there is a wrong to right, or a great truth to be asserted and advanced,
we shall claim and assert the right of the freest discussion.
"Was there ever so pitiable a spectacle as that of the present Democratic
party? All the old principles which gave it strength and dignity as a party
sacrificed and abandoned, submitting quietly to the dictation of its Execu
tive, believing everything that its Executive believes, and seeing everything
that its Executive sees, its followers are as pliant as the facile Polonius,
when Hamlet says : —
"Do you see yonder cloud, that is almost in shape of a camel?
"Polonius — 'By the mass, and 'tis like a camel indeed.'
"Hamlet — ' Methinks it is like a weasel.'
"Polonius — 'It is backed like a weasel.'
"Hamlet — 'Or like a whale.'
"Polonius — 'Very like a whale.'
"The Hards and Softs are both fleet in their chase after Executive favor,
— the contest ve*y like that between the dog and the fox, when it was
neck and neck, neck and neck, if anything, the dog a little ahead. Our
principles, gentlemen, are the same they have ever been. The great
practical end to be attained is the freedom of Kansas and the overthrow
of Democratic policy. Do you ask what influence this State election is to
have upon it? Think of the courage which a success in our great State
would infuse into the heart of every Republican in the country ; and we
ourselves will go into the contest in 1860 with drums beating and banners
flying, and success made certain.
"The days of Democratic misrule are numbered. From the waving
prairies of Iowa to the coal and iron fields of Pennsylvania, the shouts of
victory are sweeping over the land. Indiana and Ohio are swelling in
grand chorus the glad song of triumph. They have nobly wheeled into the
Republican line, and are proudly keeping step to the music of freedom.
And New York is unworthy of her high position if she does not drive
Lecomptonism from her borders, to the cypress and willow swamps of
Carolina. Upon congressional action this Winter depends the freedom of
Kansas ; and as far as your member of Congress is concerned, his past
record is clear, consistent and unflinching in opposition to the extension of
slavery. Put in nomination by the soundest men in your county, always
having been true to the principles we advocate, honest, faithful, capable,*
he will receive the vote of every good Republican in the district who
desires the success of Republican doctrines. A political party is something
more than a debating society. If it proposes to accomplish any practical
results, it must have organization, and its candidates must be supported.
The only question we as Republicans are to ask is, — Is the candidate
honest, capable, and faithful to the principles of the party ? This answered
KANSAS TROUBLES. 79
in the affirmative, there is but one course for every true Republican, and
that is to give to those candidates a hearty and vigorous support. A Dem
ocratic convention is a poor place for a man to get his Republicanism
endorsed ; and if I desired to travel on the strength of my Republicanism,
I should not go to a Democratic convention for my credentials. To you,
Republicans of Cattaraugus, do we look for success in the coming contest.
The victories of 1856 were but beginnings in the contest to follow. Soon are
we to reap the practical results of those victories. Let every man feel that
upon himself personally rests the responsibility. There is yet nerve and
muscle enough left in the popular ami to shatter the Democracy to atoms ;
and when at last, one after another, those magnificent Western empires
shall take positions in the line of States, joining in the march of advancing
civilization, with the song of Freedom on their lips, and its bright star
glittering full upon their foreheads, we will join in that grand festival
in which the North and the South, the East and the West shall strike
hands in a common brotherhood of interests, whose high purpose it shall be
to extend all over this vast continent Republican doctrine, and establish
upon it, for all time to come, Republican institutions."
CHAPTER V.
HUMILIATION AND A NEW LIFE.
THE LAST YEARS AT BUFFALO — A STUMBLE — BEGINS TO RISE AT CHICAGO —
EARLY PROFESSIONAL STRUGGLES — A SECRET SIDE — WRITING EDITORIALS
FOR THE CHICAGO PRESS — ENGLISH PHILANTHORPY — "A CHAPTER ON
BOARDING HOUSES."
DURING Mie three years immediately succeeding his admis
sion to the bar, the world looked exceedingly bright for
Mr Storrs. For a young man, he had suddenly attained a high
rank at the Buffalo bar, he was a general social favorite, his
oratorical abilities were surely extending his fame, and already
his name was beginning to be linked with honorable positions.
Unfortunately, he began to live beyond his means, and, as has
been the history of many others in this world of deceit, too sud
den success, though really merited, encourages a downfall. To
gratify the demands of vanity and the caprice of fashion, against
his own judgment, he purchased an elegant residence on Dela
ware Avenue in Buffalo, and removed to it, leaving a very com
modious and comfortable house which was better than those
occupied by many a millionaire. From this time, until the final
collapse which eventually came, he was forced to adopt and
maintain a style of living which was far beyond his means. To
keep up and hold out, he borrowed money wherever he could,
and when this resource failed him, he resorted to other shifts,
adopting means at times, not altogether commendable. About
this period, however, when he yielded to the temptations, which
professional success and general flattery encouraged, to enter upon
a course of extravagance, it might be said in extenuation, that he
80
HUMILIATION \ND A NEW LIFE. 8 1
was counting upon resources other than those which came
legitimately from the practice of his profession. He had engaged
in real estate speculations in Buffalo, and his expectations from
this venture, colored as they were by his fancy, were almost fab
ulous. Impetus was thus lent to his excessive expenditures and
to his prodigality in living. His real estate speculations proved
disastrous and he failed to meet his obligations — then came
insolvency and a most humiliating fall from his briefly maintained
high estate. Unable or unwilling to endure this abrupt termina
tion of his late prosperity, in the early part of 1858, he abandoned
Buffalo and went to live in the city of New York. Here
without clients, he swung out his shingle and attempted to inau
gurate a new career ; but he continued to err in his methods.
There was no apparent effort on his part to keep his expenses
within the limits of his income. The result was, he was unable
to sustain himself in New York and he was compelled to leave
the city. He went home in the winter of 1859, to Hinsdale,
where he had left his family, and very soon thereafter, not more
than two weeks, accompanied by his wife and baby son, he
turned his face to the growing city of Chicago. His brother-in-
law, Mr. John A. Grow, was at the time a practicing lawyer in
Chicago ; he entered into a partnership with him, and for two or
three months lived at the Grow residence, at No. 454 West
Jackson street, a dwelling since destroyed by fire. Leaving this
home, boarding-house existence was tested. The first Chicago
partnership lasted but six months.
The first case in which he appeared after his arrival in Chicago
was before the Supreme Court at Ottawa, (Benedict et a/., vs.
Prescott et al.). His next appearance was in the Circuit Court,
before Judge Manierre, in two important habeas corpus cases
ex rel. Lawslager. These cases were bitterly contested, but he
won in all of them.
His unusual legal abilities soon again made him conspicuous
in the circle of his duties, but the task of supporting himself and
family and of gradually wiping out the cloud of indebtedness,
which he had fled from, was the weary one extending through
many years. Born and matured in an atmosphere of strictest
integrity, sensitive and proud by disposition, he suffered keenest
punishment through many of the most active years of his life,
82 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
when surrounded by admirers and flatterers, but by slanderers
often as well as by loving friends, in an unsupported, silent, and, at
times, almost desperate struggle to pay off dollar for dollar, with
full interest, those who had suffered by his fanatical speculations
during the last years of his residence at Buffalo. He fully suc
ceeded in his task, but, though it consumed years of his life and
caused him often to be misunderstood, none but his family, and
a very limited inner circle of friends, knew of his " incubus of
shame," as he himself once expressed it. In fact, the bitter cup
of his life was his sudden and, as he himself once confessed,
uncalled-for wrong to himself as well as others, but he never
lay bare his wound to an unsympathetic public, preferring rather
to be misunderstood. It was only at the rarest intervals, indeed
did he ever, after his change of residence to Chicago, allude even
in the presence of his family to those early years which opened
so promisingly only to be submerged in humiliation. Once he
wrote thus to his father:
" I was crazed, I think, for a time thinking in my foolishness that any
thing could be attained by brains — even impossibilities. I will make
all right in time, if life be granted me * * but the world, and that is
one of my most sensitive punishments, misunderstands. I should cry out,
let him who hath not sinned first cast a stone."
To a sister he once said, " I am tired enough sometimes to
die, but I am becoming calloused to uncertain criticism based
on mere lack of knowing."
It was, though, only natural that the world should frequently
wonder over the anomaly of so gifted a man, known to be
earning large fees, who never seemed burdened with surplus
funds, and, for that matter, whose general financial standing was
not of the best. It is a fact that Mr. Storrs gradually extermi
nated, and in an honorable way, debts which could have been
ignored, because of lapse of time and statutory provisions ; but it
is also a fact, that though so performing, and though refusing,
point-blank to take advantage of bankruptcy laws, he found it
almost physically impossible to place the proper valuation upon
money which he could earn so easily. He suffered keenly over
the consciousness of this weakness, for he was fully cognizant
that it injured his influence and power, but, strange as it may
seem to so assert, he usually affected to despise great possessions
of gold. A rich New Yorker who had been ladening his con-
HUMILIATION AND A NEW LIFE. 83
versation, in a little company, with frequent statements that " Mr.
So and So was worth two millions " and " Mr. So and So was
worth three millions," apparently realizing no qualification for a
a man but that of wealth, was effectually silenced by the signifi
cant way in which Mr. Storrs said, " I am tired of hearing of
mean men."
Professional duties, however, while they steadily devolved more
weightily upon him, from the very outstart in the new field, did
not prevent the young lawyer from again displaying his natural
inclination for appearing in type. It was on the edge of the
great Rebellion ; a loud element was demanding all over the North
that President Lincoln should issue a proclamation declaring the
slave free ; but Mr. Storrs was of that company of reasoners who
advocated that the North should first secure that controlling, over
whelming power to enforce instant acquiescense, which should be
co-existent with proclamations. He wrote a series of bitingly sarcas
tic editorials for the Chicago Post upon this demand for an emanci
pation proclamation at its incipiency. One excerpt from a single
paragraph in an extended criticism of " Three Measures for Crush
ing Rebellion," advanced by the Tribune in September, 1861, will
suffice as a sample of his method of ridiculing that newspaper
because of such positions as -"calling for a declaration of free
dom " and that " such an emancipation! means cessation of war."
Mr. Storrs wrote :
"While the rebel General Lee is menacing Washington in front of 200,000
armed men — while Cincinnati is in danger, it would be a little difficult to
liberate slaves in Mississippi and Georgia. Slaves cannot be liberated by
our armies, until our armies succeed in flogging their masters. And so
long as our armies are unable to take a step in advance towards Richmond,
without being met, overpowered by superior numbers and driven back by
rebels in arms, the business of liberating slaves by the military power, will
not we venture to suggest, meet with very great success. The Tribune
sees this. It does not expect that the slaves shall be liberated in that
manner, but by the infinitely easier method by which the Dutch Governor
Worter Von Twiller beat off the English from New Amsterdam — by which
the Mexican generals defeated the invading army lead by General Scott
by which Hunter set the bondsmen free in South Carolina — by which Pope
abolished all 'lines of retreat' — namely, BY PROCLAMATION!! It calls for a
declaration of freedom, and declares « that so long as we neglect this most
obvious and righteous means of weakening the enemy, we shall deserve all
the calamities that a just God may now and hereafter put upon us.' Let
it be done at once! The time, the Tribune says, has come. And when
84 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
the President, beleagured as he is at Washington, issues his proclamation
declaring all the slaves in Georgia and Mississippi free, you will see the rebel
hosts melt away at once, and flee to their homes in hot haste, in order to
reach there ahead of the proclamation ! Then, let Davis, if he dare,
retaliate by issuing a proclamation declaring that all the prisoners in our
county jails and state penitentiaries shall be liberated — he will be too
late — and his proclamation will be jeered and hissed at as a base,
miserable invention of the 'high old original' proposed by the Chicago
Trib une !"
In a somewhat loftier tone, Mr. Storrs, in an editorial in the
Post of Thursday, September 25, 1861, reviewed a meeting of
the " Christian men of Chicago," held at Bryan Hall the Saturday
evening previous. The Rev. Dr. Culver took the stand, introduced
and read some resolutions, and made a speech in which he said,
for instance, "If I had the power as President Lincoln has to
free the slaves, I would do it if I died the next moment and
the nation perished, I would do it, for it would be just. God is
on the side of justice, and he who is on God's side is always
right." Reviewing the purposes of the meeting and the address
of Dr. Culver, Mr. Storrs characterized such sentiments as " the
love of one's individual views, rather than a love of country,"
and he made a strong comparison in which he portrayed what
the patriot preacher of the days of the Pilgrims would have
taught :
"The patriot of the ancient order would have told his hearers that
although war was a frightful calamity to be visited upon any nation, yet
there were greater calamities than war, among which would be the peace
ful surrender of national unity and of constitutional government ; that one
of the highest virtues which the Almighty had placed in the heart of man
was love of country, and one of the greatest sins was treason against it;
that in the present war is involved not only our national unity and our
territorial integrity, but that the success or failure of the experiment of self-
government, so nobly commenced upon this continent, and which had
already achieved results the most colossal and resplendent in history, would
be determined for all time to come ; that the sword had never been drawn
and blood had never been shed in a holier cause, and that every soldier
who died fighting for it died a martyr to a principle as noble and sublime
as ever moved the human arm, or lifted up a human heart with courage ;
that the interests of humanity and of good government everywhere,
demanded that such a war should be waged with a united, earnest, self-
sacrificing vigor; that all minor questions concerning which men differed,
should be buried out of sight ; that individual prejudices should be torn
from the heart and sacrificed to the one great object — the putting down of
armed rebellion ; that discord and dissension should cease at home, and
HUMILIATION AND A NEW LIFE. '85
every word or act which might tend to it should be ignored ; that the gov
ernment must at all hazards and at any cost or sacrifice be saved, and the
rebellion ended. Thus would the old patriot-preacher have addressed his
hearers, and thus would he have urged them on to battle, giving practical
point and emphasis to his advice by following it himself. Not so the modern
patriot-preacher. No such weakness troubles him. The Rev. Dr. Culver has
his private views concerning the negro ; his mind is made up as to the cause
of the war. Constitutional government, national unity, and the liberties of
twenty millions of people, are in his clear and more broadly expanded patriotic
vision, as nothing; the oppressed African is everything."
As he wrote thus from time to time, usually editorially, he
dwelt in various ways upon every phase of the many war ques
tions ; their importance being often local, or, if otherwise, finally
adjudicated upon by force of arms and many times discussed as
well by pen, to reproduce which in these pages can hardly inter
est. He treated in quite an original method, however, the pro
nounced attitude of a certain large class of the English people
toward the Union, about date of November 9, this same first
year of the Rebellion, in an elaborate article. Heading his article
"British Charity" he became humorously venomous as, after a
general dissertation, he proceeded to write:
" Sydney Smith once said that an Englishman's idea of charity was this :
If A sees 13 in trouble, he is exceedingly anxious to have C relieve him.
A peculiar feature of modern philanthropy, as illustrated by the British
humanitarians, is its far-reaching extent. No people are too remote. It cir
cles the globe and ransacks the remotest corners of the earth to find sub
jects upon which it may be exercised. It possesses that telescopic vision
which can see nothing in its immediate vicinity, and can only perceive suf
fering at vast distances. The tens and hundreds of thousands of starving
men and women, cooped up in its own immediate vicinity and thronging
the streets of its cities, are not the objects for which British philanthropy
seeks ; nor do their cries of suffering ever reach the ears of the titled and
aristocratic humanitarians who assemble at Exeter Hall to wail in concert
over the sins of the unclad Patagonians and the horrors of African slavery.
"For half a century this country has been an especial object of this high-
toned charity. The tears that the Duchess of Devonshire and her
associates have shed over the sufferings of the oppressed black man on
this continent have been sufficient in quantity, if rightly applied, to wash
away every sin denounced in the decalogue. Year after year have these
amiable and high-toned philanthropists mourned over the sufferings of the
negro, and bewailed the enormity of the sin which held him in bondage.
The English poet and the painter have at the call of their noble humani
tarian patrons, painted and displayed to the world the frightful horrors of
African slavery, and denounced the American republic as guilty of the
86 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
greatest sin known amongst nations. The institution of slavery, they
decided, was a barbarism, and the community which fostered it were bar
barians. They sent their missionaries across the seas to convert us from so
heinous a sin, and to inaugurate a movement which should result in the
liberation of the negro. The British government has year after year lent
its assistance to the holy work in which its Dukes and Duchesses were
engaged, and has divided the immense weight of its influence between the
grand projects of evangelizing the thronging millions of the Indies at the
point of the bayonet and the mouth of the cannon, civilizing the Chinese
up to an appreciation of the use of opium, and the liberation of the black
man on this continent.
"Thousands of our own people caught the contagion of this noble example.
The grand chorus of lamentation over the sin of slavery which for fifty
years has uninterruptedly gone up from Exeter Hall, has been repeated
here. The sighs of English nobility have blended with those of our untitled
philanthropists. Together have their tears been shed. The irresistible
attraction which draws men and women united in the same holy purpose
indissolubly together, had united the English humanitarian and the Ameri
can philanthropist, so strongly that the connection could never be severed.
"The rebellion of the southern states against the government offered a
magnincient opportunity for the practical display of this modern English
charity. The slave-holding power, instead of being at all intimidated, or
converted by the holy zeal of English philanthropists and their co-opera
tors in this country, had yearly increased its demands, exacted concession
after concession, until it finally culminated in the division of the Demo
cratic party at Charleston. So far from listening to and heeding the pious
exhortations of that type of modern philanthrophy, the Duchess of Devon
shire, the southern politician insisted that slavery was a divine institution, the
very corner stone of civilization.
"To give full emphasis to this idea, the rebellion was inaugurated, and the
power of the general government insulted and defied. Of course, in such a
struggle, when the slave-holder was arrayed in arms against the government,
the philanthropists of this country looked to their brothers in Great Britain for
comfort and assistance. Alas, for the vanity of all earthly hopes! They had
not long to wait to discover the terrible error into which they had fallen.
" Instead of the old style of lamentation over the sorrows of the oppressed
African, English charity assumed a different shape, and broke out in a new
spot. A new light has dawned upon the English mind. The injured and
chivalric southerner is now the especial object of English pity, and the
unholy attempt to coerce him into submission to the government, is the
staple of British denunciation. English philanthropy has stuffed its ears with
cotton, and can hear no longer the cries of the suffering Congo. It sees
not the earnest struggle, the self-sacrificing devotion of a great people to
preserve their national integrity, but it professes to see, in its dove-like
simplicity, the horrors of a civil war, which it proposes kindly to prevent
by an armed intervention in behalf of the slave-holder and rebel. It
shudders over the contemplation of servile insurrections which for long
HUMILIATION AND A NEW LIFE. 8/
years its has striven to produce. It bewails the prostrate condition of
its new allies, whom it once denounced as barbarians. It sends up long
exhortations against the horrors of war, while the bleaching bones of
thousands of helpless Hindoos, slaughtered by its armies, whiten the soil
of a country which it has robbed and devastated."
This chapter, and these selections as illustrations of his writings
to the press at this period, can be well closed by an article, which
appeared in a Chicago Sunday paper in November of 1861; it is
a comically grave treatise on what half of the world — the saddest
half, too ! — know full well, and which he himself styled "A
Chapter on Boarding-houses : "
"Next to the war, the subject of boarding-houses is to the Chicago public
of perhaps greater importance than any other. While the rent of an ordinary
tenement is five hundred dollars per year, men of limited incomes must of
necessity adopt some other mode of living than that of housekeeping.
Boarding, then, is not altogether a matter of choice, but in the great
majority of instances one of necessity. The subject is therefore one of great
importance, and we propose to treat it in that serious manner befitting its
gravity and importance.
" It will first be proper to arrive at an understanding of the meaning of the
word 'boarding-house.' There is in Webster's dictionary no such word to be
found. We find the word 'boarding-school,' but not 'boarding-house.' The
verb ' board ' is, however, defined thus : — ' To furnish with food, or food and
lodging for a compensation.' The noun 'house,' in its general sense, is defined
thus : — ' A building or shed intended or used as a habitation or shelter for
animals of any kind, but appropriately a building or edifice for the habita
tion of man, a dwelling-place, mansion or abode for any of the man species.
It may be of any size, and composed of any materials whatever — wood,
stone, brick, etc.' We define 'boarding-house,' therefore, thus: — 'A
dwelling-place, mansion, or abode for any of the human species, where food,
or food and lodging, are furnished for a compensation.'
" For the purpose of a more accurate understanding of tbe subject, we
would divide boarding-houses into two classes, viz : The private boarding-
house, and the public boarding-house. The difference between the two
may be said to consist in the fact that the former is usually built as a
private residence, and continues to be occupied as such by the person fur
nishing the food, or the food and lodging; while the latter partakes more
of the character of a hotel, — boards more people than the private boarding-
house, and differs from a hotel more particularly in the fact that its guests
are permanent occupants, or comparatively so.
" Private boarding-houses are at least of three distinct classes : First, the
'genteel' private boarding-house. Second, the private boarding-house
'just five minutes walk from the post office.' Third, the private boarding-
house where a gentleman and his wife or two single gentlemen will be
taken, and positively no others, references given and required."
88 LIFE OF EMERY A STORKS.
"The gentility of the 'genteel' private boarding-house is not to be found
usually in the house, or its location, nor in the food or lodging furnished,
nor in any of its appointments or surroundings, but in the persons who
keep it, and in the compensation required by them. The industrious
searcher after a boarding-house may know when he has found a genteel
private boarding-house for himself and family by observing the presence or
absence of the following symptoms :
" He will usually find, as he stands upon the threshold of the house he
is about to enter, an indented gutta-percha foot-mat, looking, so far as the
indentations are concerned, very much like an overdone and over-sized
waffle ; the bell-knob will be of brass ; there will usually be a doorplate.
When he rings the bell, he will find that the bell machinery is somewhat
disarranged, and after waiting some length of time, a servant will cautiously
open the door, and as cautiously permit him to enter. He will inquire
whether boarders are taken there. The answer will be evasive, and unsat
isfactory, but he will be requested to take a seat in the parlor until
Madame is consulted. As the servant disappears in the distance, through
the door which she opens to enter her peculiar sphere will come the
poignant odors of boiled pork and cabbage. He enters the parlor; finds a
piano, and, if it be in the winter season, a fire burning with an apparent
doubt as to whether it has a right to burn. The piano will be opened, and
on the rack he will observe ' Then you'll remember me,' ' False one, I
love thee still,' and the latest two-shilling war ballad. Over the piano he
will observe the engraving, in a gilt frame, of • Shakespeare and his Con
temporaries.' Over the mantel will be hung, also in a gilt frame, 'The
Village Blacksmith.' On the centre table he will observe a photographic
album, and suspended from the chandelier a basket of beads, curiously
wrought. He will seat himself in a rocking chair, covered all over with a
tidy, and while doing so will have occasion to notice in the back parlor a
pale, genteel looking young lady, engaged in working a green dog, with
red ears, on a pink ground. All those things he will have plenty of time
to discover before Madame arrives. He will wait long and anxiously, and
finally will hear the rustling of silks through the hall, and Madame, a lady
of mature years in an excellent state of preservation, and elegantly clad,
will enter. He will begin to think he has mistaken the place. He will
tremblingly and doubtingly make known his business. A long pause will
ensue, during which Madame will examine him critically. She will at
length ask, ' Who informed him that she kept a boarding-house ? ' That
question answered, she will respond that she does not keep a boarding-
house, never did, and will not until she is obliged to. The gentleman
apologizes for his mistake and proceeds to take his departure, when Mad
ame adds that although she does not keep a boarding-house, still there
are stopping with her, for company's sake, two or three very pleasant
families and acquaintances of hers ; that she has one delightful room
unoccupied, which, under the circumstances, in view of the difficulty of
getting good boarding-places, she might be induced to let to a real
gentleman with a small family, and, for the purpose of accommodating,
HUMILIATION AND A NEW LIFE. 89
she would let it to him. The gentleman, delighted beyond measure at
his good fortune, examines the room ; and although it is rather small,
and rather dark, and rather inconvenient of access, and rather too
scantily furnished; in vievr of the very fine society and many home
comforts which his family can have, — the parlors always being open —
he concludes to take it at a price somewhat higher than he would pay
at the Sherman or the Tremont.
" He takes his departure with many bows and smiles, and hastens to the
wife of his bosom, to advise her of his extreme good fortune. She main
tains a provoking reticence, simply inquiring the age of the hostess, whether
she has any daughters, whether there are closets, or a wardrobe, and a
place for storing trunks ; and prepares to leave. Upon their arrival, they
find no closets, no wardrobe, no place for storing trunks ; the stove
smokes ; the door won't shut ; the windows won't open ; but finally they
are settled. He hurries to dinner, and Madame, after introducing them
to a large number of other boarders, informs him that they all are very
fond of boiled dinners, and they have one that day. She again informs
him that her boarders are all dyspeptic and eat no pastry, but that, if
he desires it, she has pastry, which she will get for him especially. At
the end of the week he finds many extras on his board bill, for fixing
stove and windows, and for closet and store-room. His further experi
ence shows him that the meat is mostly cold shoulder, and the gentility,
an anxious spirit of investigation on the part of the hostess and the
other boarders into his business, its present profits, and its future pro
spects. He comes home to find his wife wretched and in tears. The
lady of the house has pronounced her diamonds paste, her gem of a
watch pinchbeck, her gold oroide, and her new silk dresses second-hand.
The servant girls plunder his wife's wardrobe: Madame and her daugh
ters borrow her furs ; and finally Madame would like to know whether
he couldn't as well as not advance two or three month's board. It is
the last straw that breaks the camel's back. He proposes to leave, and
goes again up and down streets and avenues, vowing that he will never
again enter a 'genteel' private boarding-house.
"The boarding-house 'five minutes walk from the post office,' he finds
to be either in the vicinity of the Bull's Head, Lake View, or Hyde Park.
The boarding-house 'where positively no other boarders are taken,' is
thronged and overrun with clerks, musicians, soldiers, and dancing-masters.
He starts for the public boarding-house, the peculiar features of which I
reserve for another time."
CHAPTER VI.
PROFESSIONAL DILIGENCE.
THE HAZARD CASE — AN OUTLINE OF A MODEL SPEECH TO A JURY — HIS EARLY
BRIEFS, A MONUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL INDUSTRY— SOME OF HIS WORK.
QUESTIONS relating to the liability of railroad corporations
for injuries sustained by individuals, whether passengers or
not, by reason of the negligence of those in their employ, are fre
quently difficult of satisfactory solution, often very embarrassing to
courts, and always of grave public importance. The railroad
interests of this country have increased with the added days of
the last half century. Millions of money are yearly invested
in the construction and equipment of railroads, and yearly, also,
are the lives of millions of people dependent upon the care and
skill with which railroads are managed. Thus while the benefits
which enterprises of such magnitude confer upon the country,
together with the vast sums of money invested in them, should,
on the one hand, admonish courts to exercise proportionate cau
tion lest such capital and its legitimate beneficial achievements be
checked, through the establishment of any hastily considered rule
governing their liability, at the same time, the public who resort
to that method of traveling should be protected with a care
equally zealous, and as the slightest negligence by the employes
of a railroad may work the most disastrous consequences, it should
be unsparingly punished, since in no other way can the public
interests be conserved or the safety of individuals be insured.
Regarded from any point of view, the case of Erastus W.
Hazard, against the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
Company was an important one. Mr. Hazard was a lawyer
90
PROFESSIONAL DILIGENCE. 9!
well and favorably known throughout the State of Illinois. The
injury sustained by him was very serious in character and
deprived him permanently of the use of a leg. The defendant, the
Chicago, Burlington^ & Quincy Railroad Company, was one of the
most important railroad lines in the country, running through a
territory of exceeding agricultural richness, connecting the city
of Chicago with the Mississippi River at Burlington, in the State
of Iowa, and at the city of Quincy in the State of Illinois. The
case was tried in the Circuit Court of the city of Chicago, with
great ability on both sides. J. Manning and E. Van Buren,
prominent at the Northwestern bar of those days, appeared for
the plaintiff, and the distinguished railroad legal firm of Walker,
Van Arman & Dexter for the railroad company. The facts,
briefly, were as follows :
Mr. Hazard took passage upon a freight train, running from
Kewanee to Galesburg, only one passenger train being put upon
the road daily. Attached to this freight train was a car used
for the conveyance of passengers, with cushioned seats, having a
door at each end of the car. Mr. Hazard "paid the usual fare,
and when within a short distance of Galesburg asked the conductor
if there would be supper in readiness at the depot. He was told
that there would not be at that hour of the night ; he then asked
the conductor where they were to stop. The conductor said he
could not tell, but as the train run very slowly before reaching the
regular station, business men made it a custom of getting off the
train before it reached that point, and when the train slowed up
that he might, if he wished, get off safely. Mr. Hazard then
went to the front end of the car and the conductor, told him he
had better get out of the rear end ; he did so, but while still at
the door, with one hand holding the side of the door, the train
was suddenly jerked, and Mr. Hazard was thrown from the plat
form, striking in the rear of the car, and his ankle was dislocated
and fractured, resulting in the loss of the lower part of his limb.
There was no railing, guard, chain, or other protection, on the
rear platform.
The case was tried before a jury at a session of the Circuit
Court, Knox County, and a verdict rendered for the plaintiff in
the sum of eleven thousand dollars. The railroad company
appealed from the decision to the Supreme Court, which set aside
92 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
the judgment on the ground, chiefly, of excessive damages. It
was at this stage of the proceedings, in 1861, that Mr. Storrs
was called in, having been retained for the purpose of reviewing
the opinion given by Justice Breese from the. Supreme Bench of
Illinois.
The review prepared by Mr. Storrs was one of the most elab
orate, perhaps, ever presented on the subject before such a court ;
it filled a duodecimo volume of one hundred and fifty-six closely
printed pages. In it, were traced the rulings of both English
and American judiciaries, from the earliest date, comprehensively
yet succinctly, and at the same time, in a polished style such as
to make interesting the dry topics of law to the most casual
reader. He discussed the care required of a railroad company,
both in the construction of its cars and the management of its
trains ; the degree of care the law demanded of passengers, and
the effect of negligence upon both parties ; the rules by which
the damages sustained are to be measured ; the conclusion of the
finding of a jury ; how far a court can look into the facts them
selves, and the various other questions arising under such circum
stances. It is to be regretted, for the edification of both the
lawyers and the well-informed element of the people, that the
masterly argument and review can not be reprinted entire.
The result, however, was, that a new trial was granted and heard
in October, 1865, in the United States District Court for the
Northern District of Illinois, when the jury again gave a large
verdict against the railroad in the sum of fifteen thousand dollars.
In the second trial Mr. Storrs made the closing argument to the
jury. His speech consumed three hours of time. The notes,
written in a bold hand, during the progress of the speech of Mr.
Van Arman who preceded him, and from which he made his
argument, exist entire. They are presented here just as their
maker headed and arranged them, and afford a model for the
outlining of any like address ; rough sketch, as they are, these
notes mark luminously the logical workings of the mind of one
of the greatest of trial lawyers, and there creeps out from between
the condensed lines that singular humor and power of ridicule
which Mr. Storrs possessed. The notes were as follows :
PROFESSIONAL DILIGENCE. 93
/
UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT.
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS.
ERASTUS W. HAZARD,
vs.
THE CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY.
Memorandum for Argument to the Jury.
October 25, 1865.
I.
The patient attention given by the Jury.
II.
I have kept my promise made in my opening.
I have proved every fact that I promised to establish.
The defendant has taken precisely the course I told you he would
adopt.
III.
Has Mr. Van Arman established the facts stated in his opening?
He told you that a railroad corporation is a beneficial power.
Has he shown it?
That the careless men are almost the only ones who get hurt.
Has he proved it?
That the prejudice against railroads is the result of ignorance.
Has that been proved?
Are railroads beneficent powers and is the prejudice against them the
result of ignorance ?
Has this road been beneficent to Hazard?
94 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORRS.
Is it to take a position as one of our charitable institutions ?
Is this prejudice the result of ignorance?
The outcry made by railroads against the prejudice of jurors.
The Camden & Amboy.
" N. Y. Central.
" Penna.
" Baltimore £ Ohio.
" Western roads and freights.
The carelessness of life and limb.
Norfolk — Bergen Tunnel. 3000 killed the past year.
The feeling of hostility necessary.
Both counsel for defendant depreciate this feeling.
Walker says he is no orator.
Proves it by a four hours speech.
And that he is no poet.
But deals in nothing but finery.
Van Arman in his simplicity had supposed that no blame would be
attached to defendant.
Both profess great candor and prove it by the manner in which they
discuss the facts.
IV.
The general features of the defense.
The swarms of witnesses.
The malignity of the defense.
The savage attacks on the plaintiff.
The spies and informers.
The manufactured experiment.
The evident servility of its employes.
The impudent questions put to our Hannibal witnesses.
The exhibition of moneyed power.
The consequent importance of the case as vindicating the right of trial
by jury.
V.
The law of the case.
The carrier and the passenger.
PROFESSIONAL DILIGENCE. 95
Van Annan s precipice — No liability if a man falls over — But the
owner of the precipice must not jerk it while paying spectators are stand
ing on the brink.
VI.
The case as made by us.
State it.
Wherein does it differ from theirs and what are the disputed facts?
1. Was it the practice of the defendant to carry passengers on this
train ?
2. Was the jerking of the train necessary and unavoidable ?
3. Is a guard chain or bar useful or necessary for the protection of the
passenger ?
4. Did the plaintiff proceed to alight from the train at the instance,
advice, or suggestion of the Conductor.
The practice of the defendant to carry passengers on that train is shown.
1. By Van Arman's admissions in his opening.
2. The Case in the Supreme Court so finds it.
3. The evidence of Garretson.
" " " Morse.
" " " Fitch.
" " " Cutton.
" " " Beardsley.
" " " Marshall Hazard.
" " " Plaintiff.
Contra.
Col. Hammond and Cheney.
Read time Card.
The Jerking.
State the exact question.
1. Steam can be applied gradually, little by little.
2. Brakes applied to prevent slack. Defendants witnesses show this.
3. Not necessary to let on steam at all in this case. Twenty-six out
of thirty-two depositions prove it.
4. This exact case has not been put to a single one of defendants
witnesses in deposition.
5. Clark, the Engineer, was not sworn about it.
6. The experiment.
96 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
7. Garfield, Patch, Birch, Bush, Jarret, and Col. Hammond.
8. The two Experimental trips. Col. Hammond and the Prince of
Wales ; the last Experiment, including a description of Col. Hammond.
The Queen's letter.
The guard chain or bar.
State the real question.
In use on over forty roads, on caboose and way cars.
A question to be determined by our own knowledge.
The defendants testimony on this point exhibits the coercive power ot
Railroads.
Patch with his feet in the chain.
Hammond with a chain as high as his neck.
Entitled to recover on Bush's statement.
Was Hazard advised &c., to get off at the next crossing?
This is a question of veracity between Bush and Hazard.
Is Bush entitled to credit ?
1. He swears that it was not the practice to carry passengers on that
train.
This is contradicted by six witnesses.
2. That Hazard attempted to get on the train before it stopped.
Contradicted by Garretson circumstantially.
3. That he asked Hazard if he had a ticket.
Contradicted.
4. That there were no other passengers on the train.
Contradicted.
5. That the ticket was endorsed.
Contradicted by Hazard and his former testimony.
6. His statement to the Company.
His date, etc.
7. His first conversation with Hazard.
Read Sumbard" s deposition.
Record Page 133, 137.
Comment on Van Arman.
Read TAYLOR'S deposition.
PROFESSIONAL DILLIGENCE. 97
How this conversation occurred and why Hazard sent for him again.
8. The second conversation.
Marshall Hazard's testimony.
9. The probabilities of the case.
Why would Hazard suggest getting off BEFORE getting to the passenger
depot when he knew the train was not going there.
Bush agrees that he wanted to go there and get a supper.
But the fact is, Bush himself desired to leave the car when he told
Hazard to, and started to do so.
10. Bush's account of Hazard's fall — sum all up.
The attempt to impeach Hazard.
The instruments are
PATCH, GOODRICH AND BUNCE.
The vilest product of modern civilization is the man gossip and informer.
The business of a scavenger is respectable in comparison.
Railroad corporations have pulled down from the stars great men,
but they went down into the mud and grubbed up Patch and Goodrich.
PATCH.
1. Who is he?
2. His manner on the stand. The sycophant
3. His double swear.
4. He testifies as to Hazard's opening.
5. He comes back and testifies for the first time to a conversation at
Hazard's house.
6. Contradicted as to the opening by Beardsley and Ford.
7. As to the conversation by all the circumstances.
He must have started very early for Hazard's house.
The defence are ashamed of him and abandon him.
Good Bye, Patch.
GOODRICH.
i. Who is he?
7
98 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
2. Ashamed of his position — nervous and twitching.
3. His testimony ; time and plan. His haste to tell Ward.
4. How contradicted ?
5. Walker and Van Arman water haul.
Was it candid?
Good bye, Mr. Goodrich.
When we want a conversation carried on thirty feet off, over a six
foot wall, and through a twenty-five foot house, we'll send for you.
BUNCE.
Who and what was he?
Read his testimony, Record, p. 117.
It contradicts every thing else, and
Is contradicted by Hazard.
Hazard's self-impeachment.
The solemn change — The large promise and the small performance.
More thunder than rain.
Read Hazard's testimony.
About being nine feet from the door.
Charges made against Hazard.
A miserable wretch.
Hazard's statements false as false can be.
His professional standing turned into ridicule.
Not content with crippling him for life, they seek to blast his good name
and blacken his character.
Is not this a power to be dreaded and feared.
They maim him, spy upon him, and ask you to help them.
You are the only shield he has.
The measure of damages.
Show the incurable and permanent character of the injury.
Its effect upon general health.
PROFESSIONAL DILIGENCE. 99
It has incapacitated him for business and destroyed his future.
The extent of his business before the injury.
The growing power of monopolies must be checked.
Van Arman's ridicule of the use of legs to a lawyer.
Van Arman's legs have been of great service to him.
They have carried him rapidly out of many a tight place, have been
his best friends, it is unkind in him to speak so poorly of them.
Van Annan says he is low Dutch. His talk, if Dutch at all, is very low
Dutch.
His friend Doty the thief was a sympathetic man. — Hence thieves are
sympathetic men, and sympathetic men are thieves.
In becoming jurors you do not cease to be men.
It is proper that you should sympathize with Hazard's misfortunes
and proper that you should punish the author of his misfortunes.
Corporations have no sympathies because they have no souls.
Hence you can't hurt the defendant's feelings by giving a heavy
verdict against it, because it has no feelings.
Van Arman's sympathies for the defendant would not be greatly
excited, for he substantially admits that he has no sympathies for anything.
The nearest he ever came to being sympathetic was, in having a thief
friend who had some sympathy for the sorrows of others.
Better be Doty the thief, in a prison but with some human sympathies
about him — than Van Arman at large, confessedly the soulless attorney
of a soulless corporation.
Doty would not swop places.
Conclusion.
During the four years in which the Hazard case dragged along
it was by no means the sole thing that occupied Mr. Storrs'
attention; they were years overflowing with work, and no man
ever worked more intensely over the topics in hand than this
same man whose brilliant wit and capability were, as is often the
case, ascribed to genius. He, himself, always talked of the
genius of labor. Frequently he has been known to say, " wrork
is the only progenitor of genius."
100 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
Once in a conversation, he was asked how he first began
public speaking. The reply was, "I filled myself up and then
there was a flow." Frail as he was physically, in the early years
of his life he toiled often through all the night. It was his
habit to review thoroughly during the nights of his long trials,
every line of evidence and law that had been advanced during
the day. "I make it a rule of my lawyer's life," he said, "to
know all — both law and fact — that can possibly be advanced for
and against."
The late Hon. Thomas Hoyne, himself one of the most suc
cessful lawyers of the West, related that he had retained Mr.
Storrs to assist him in an important case during the year 1864.
The hearing had continued several days. It had reached the
stage when Mr. Storrs was to present the case before the jury
the following morning. Just before the court sat in the morning,
Mr. Storrs walked into Mr. Hoyne's office, his face wan and his
eyes bleared. "You look as though ill to death," was Mr.
Hoyne's greeting.
" On the contrary," was the reply, "I have been arranging the
ceremonies for the funeral of the other side. It took me until
four o'clock this morning to go through the evidence, and then,
on the strength of my wife's good coffee, I prepared my argu
ment."
Mr. Hoyne concluded: "It was an argument, too."
If there existed no other evidence of his intense working
habits, his early briefs would be a monument in themselves. In
the Hazard case, for example, he referred in his law argument
to more than two hundred reports, and in his private memoranda
every case cited appears carefully digested, with notes indicating
the degree of weight each authority carried upon the question at
issue. Moreover, it seemed as though he never varied the
amount of labor placed upon a matter in which he had been
retained in proportion to the sum involved. "I take it," he
once remarked, "that each question assigned an attorney embodies
some vital principle, and it may be that which is little in money
is big with law." Doubtless, he so governed himself as a lawyer.
To the world, seeing only the result, he often appeared "a
genius," so smoothly, almost flippantly at times, did he deal
with law and facts, and he was seldom credited with what he
PROFESSIONAL DILIGENCE. IOI
himself deemed the more creditable, namely, severe work ; but
the voluminous remains of his legal work of even those earliest
years in Buffalo and in Chicago, testify to his enormous capacity,
though weak in body, to accomplish Herculean tasks. In the
case of the City of Chicago vs. one Allen Roberts, heard, in
1859, in the United States Circuit Court for the Northern Dis
trict of Illinois, he cited and commented, in one brief, from and
upon more than two hundred and fifty authorities upon the right
and duties of individuals in the use and enjoyment of public high
ways. On the 1 6th of September, 1859, Erastus Warner was arrested
for gaming on the fair grounds of the United States Agricultural
Society, and in a trial before the Hon. George Manierre, it took
over three hundred carefully analyzed authorities for Mr. Storrs
to present to his Honor a review broad enough, in his judgment,
to cover the one point of law really involved in the case. In
representing Elliot Anthony, the well-known judge and writer on
legal topics, at Chicago, in February, 1860, in an action to
recover damages against one R. G. Clendennin, who was sheriff
of Whiteside County, and had failed properly to act as such
officer under an execution placed in his hands by Judge Anthony,
Mr. Storrs presented to the notice of the adjudicating court over
two hundred and eighty authorities. At the close of the defense
in the Cook County court, of Illinois, 1860, of a thief who claimed
that the stolen goods, found in his possession, were placed upon
his person when he had been stupefied by drink, the wondering
court exclaimed: "Mr. Storrs, by your labor one would think
you were defending all the alleged thieves on earth whom you
thought innocent." " So I am, your Honor," came the quick
response, " in removing the stain of one." He lugged into court,
July 29, 1862, nearly four hundred English and American cita
tions, in a question involving the validity to land-title of one
Flora N. Mills, the deed of the property not having been
recorded before a subsequent purchaser stepped into possession.
In 1 86 1, at Milwaukee, in a masterly argument made by Mr.
Storrs, on the application, construction, and constitutionality of
the homestead exemption laws, of Wisconsin passed in 1858, as
to certain rights acquired by creditors under them, he argued
broadly from the principles of law that all state legislation
impairing the obligation of contracts is unconstitutional and void;
IO2 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
that the obligation of a contract consists in its binding force
upon the parties and the rights and duties which arise under it;
that the laws in existence at the time of a contract are attached
to and form a part of it and contracts are presumed to be made
with reference to those laws; that all rights which are secured
under a contract are vested in their character, and that no subse
quent legislation can deprive the party of rights so secured ; that
the lien of a judgment is a vested right, and, when once obtained, f
cannot be impaired ; and that any legislation which deprives a
party of the remedies existing for the enforcement of a right,
renders the right itself useless, and is unconstitutional — and, in
support of these various positions he advanced decisions number
ing over five hundred. It must be remembered, too, every case
cited by him in Court was first carefully digested, usually in
writing, before proposed for consideration. No lawyer living
ever knew Mr. Storrs to refer to an authority every component
part of which he did not seem to be thoroughly familiar with.
It was such labor, let it be repeated, that earned his reputation
as a great lawyer. He could well be pardoned, then, for
writing to his wife, from Chicago, under date of June 19, 1860:
"When hardly 24 years of age, I stood as prominently at the bar as
any young man in the State of New York. At that age, from among
the ablest men in the State I was selected to represent the interests of
the Republican party in a very important portion of that State."
After referring to his early struggles in Chicago, he continues:
" I am intrusted with cases involving large interests, and difficult and intri
cate questions. I am treated with marked consideration and respect by every
Judge upon the bench, and my arguments and suggestions are attentively
listened to and most thoroughly considered. Every Judge upon the bench
is my active and personal friend ; every lawyer very happy to get my
opinion, and my business is rapidly increasing. * * * *
"I am dreaming no dreams of the future, but working hard each day,
trusting that, with the present well attended to, the future will be made
secure. I am a prouder man to-day than I ever was. I have much
more to be proud of. I am proud of my darling wife, who stood by
me through those dark and terrible days with a courage which people here
had not the capacity or the nobility of heart to understand or appreciate.
" I am proud of that dear wife, who, sorely tried as she has been, has
never yet surrendered or given up her faith or devotion in her husband. I
am proud of that dear wife, who has offered up so much for me on the
altar of that pure and holy affection, and will for it yet reap her reward.
PROFESSIONAL DILIGENCE. 1 03
" I am proud of a wife who in the darkened hour has yet seen some
brightness in the future, and who has bravely suffered through it all."
In this manner, with this spirit, Emery A. Storrs worked on
and upward for years, until the mention of almost any important
Western case was but in connection with his name.
CHAPTER VII.
OUR NATIONAL FUTURE.
A PATRIOTIC ADDRESS ON THE FOURTH OF JULY, 1864 — OUR NATION THE
EMBODIED SPIRIT OF THE GREAT MEN WHO HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO ITS
GLORY IN THE PAST — A NATION SAVED AT SUCH A COST OF BLOOD
AND TREASURE WILL THINK MORE HIGHLY OF ITS PRIVILEGES — POLITICS
WILL BE ELEVATED INTO PATRIOTIC STATESMANSHIP — OUR NATIONAL
LITERATURE AND HABITS OF THOUGHT.
IN a letter dated May 12, 1879, Mr. Storrs says to a corre
spondent who had invited him to deliver a Fourth of July
address at Monmouth, Illinois :
"I have about made up my mind to celebrate the coming Fourth as
a private citizen, and at home. I have delivered an address every
Fourth of July since 1855, and am inclined to make this year an excep
tion."
He had certainly well earned his holiday, — one in a quarter of a
century. The earliest of his Fourth of July speeches that has
been preserved is here given from his own manuscript. It was
delivered in Chicago on the fourth recurrence of the national anni
versary after the outbreak of the rebellion :—
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN : I purpose to speak to you to-night concerning
'Our National Future.' I purpose so to speak not as a politician, nor as the
advocate of any particular policy. I speak in the interests of no man, nor
set of men ; in behalf of no party, unless it be that great party of the
country ; found everywhere and whose adherents nearly one million in num
ber have carried our flag through the storm and roar of an hundred battles,
and have bared their breasts in the defense of the best Government the
world has ever seen. Our National Future: — What is it to be? Never since
Governments existed among men has a mightier question been presented,
nor one in which mankind everywhere, to-day and for all time to come,
have a deeper interest.
104
OUR NATIONAL FUTURE. 10$
The purpose of a nation is to train men ; that nation which trains the
best men is the best nation ; and that nation, which gives to human thought
its largest scope and freest range ; which without shackles or hinderances
places in every man's hands the implements by which he is to work out
his own success ; which makes of each individual the architect of his own
fortunes, and which limits the range of human thought and human enter
prise, only within the boundaries of absolute right and justice ; that nation
trains the best men and is therefore the best nation.
And so, embodied in this question, — 'What shall be our national
future?' — is not merely whether Jefferson Davis shall fail or succeed,
whether the boundaries of the United States of America shall by rebellious
bayonets be crowded from the Gulf to the very gates of our National Capi
tal ; but what is of vastly more consequence than these even, whether the
experiment of seltgovernment so magnificently inaugurated upon this con
tinent shall be a final success, gladdening the hearts of good men every
where through all the ages to come, or whether disastrous defeat shall
overtake its champions, and it be pronounced a failure for evermore. For
this sublime experiment failing here does fail for evermore. And hence
it is that in the solution of this mighty question all interests are affected.
Upon the triumph of the National arms depends not only all that we have of
material and physical consequence, but disaster to the mighty cause is ruin
to all the glorious promises of our ideal future as well. I need, I am
sure, on this occasion and in this community indulge in no exhortations to
faithfulness to our cause. It has been defended as never cause was
defended before. With a zeal loftier and holier than that which fired the
hearts of the followers of the hermit to rescue from the profanation of infidel
presence the tomb of the Lord, have the millions of this great republic
lavished blood and treasure to rescue from the profanation of rebel hand,
the sacred depository of human freedom. We fight then for the Nation,
and this includes not merely the territory which makes up its physical
extent, but the idea which is embodied in it. Our nation is not simply
thirty-four States, but it is all the glory of our past, all the hope and
promise of the future. We are the trustees of this continent not for our
own interests alone but for mankind everywhere. We have been fighting
now for nearly three years to save this nation, not for the value of its cot
ton and wheat and corn and manufacturers, but for the value of the hope,
the ideas, the aspirations, the tendencies which it embodies and of" which it
is the Divinely chosen champion. To-day the Nation for whose salvation
we are fighting is the embodied spirit of the great departed ones who have
contributed to its glory. Our nation is the wise forecast of Washington ; the
sturdy patriotism of Adams ; the earnest philosophic love of equal rights of
Jefferson ; the clear and penetrating vision of Hamilton ; the fiery zeal of
Clay ; the intellectual grandeur of Webster ; the indomitable honesty of
purpose of Jackson. Every great man or woman who has ever lived in it
and contributed to its growth, has infused the ideas which have constituted
that greatness into the national life and thus has each one become a part
of the nation.
106 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
The Nation which we now fight to save is all the heroic endurance,
lofty fortitude, patient, uncomplaining patriotism of the revolutionary
fathers. The broad and world embracing enterprise, the marvellous activ
ity, the wonderful progressiveness of their children, knit indissolubly
together by that Divine idea of self-government which inspired the fathers
through the bloody toils of its creation and which, if faithfully adhered to,
will crown with triumphant glory the efforts of their children for its
everlasting perpetuation.
This Nation then, is, so to speak, the spirit of representative Government
made manifest in the flesh of its people. The grand old puritan poet John
Milton, who although he saw not with earthly vision, did see with the infin
itely clearer perception of an earnest, holy and exalted vision said " Better
kill a man than a good book. Who kills a man kills a reasonable creature,
God's image, but who kills a good book kills the image of God as it were
in the eye." And so I say better that our darlings should all perish in this
mighty struggle than that it be not prosecuted to success. They are it is true
God's noblest images, but who kills this nation, the embodiment of all these
heaven born aspirations, these grand ideas, kills the image of God as it
were in the eye. For this Nation is the precious life-blood of all these mas
ter-spirits embalmed and treasured up on purpose for a life beyond life.
We are "here in this mighty north-west from every portion of the country ;
from every quarter of the globe. The spirit of our institutions, now imperiled,
and which we now fight to save, has drawn us hither. We come from the
shadows of the old South Church, baptized as it has been in the waters of a
religious faith ; from the fields of Lexington and Concord where the first
shot of a farmer-soldier was fired, a shot which was heard all around the
globe ; from the grand old Empire State with its long line of noble names
and its long list of heroic achievements, with its colossal commerce, the
fibres of which intertwine the fate of kingdoms and which stands like the
angel of the Apocalypse, one foot resting on the sea and the other upon
the land and mistress of both ; from the old Keystone, glorified by the
greatness of Penn and Franklin, and whose reddened fields at Gettysburg
are sanctified by the blood of heroes dying to save the cause, for which
Penn and Franklin lived and died before them ; from the old world too
with its noble traditions and with its noble names are we here as well
All these memories, all these exalted deeds have we brought hither with us,
the idea of free government crystalizing them all about. These — these
thus fused together ; thus working out their colossal results through us on
these fruitful plains are our nation's, and how worthily that nation has been
defended by her north-western sons, history has already recorded. For
this nation thus constituted by divine appointment the custodian of the
dearest and most priceless interests ever entrusted to a people's keeping are
we fighting, and so on a scale commensurate with the mighty issues involved
is the warfare waged. Never before has this world seen such awful conse'
quences hanging dependent upon the dread arbitrament of war. Never
before has this world seen a continent shaken at one moment as it were from
OUR NATIONAL FUTURE. IO/
centre to circumference by the shock and roar of battles waged by countless
numbers on either side ; campaigns with empires for their theatre, and the
red flames of the rebellion lighting up the whole heavens with the inten
sity of their glow. It is well that the Titanic forces to which this continent has
given birth and which it has nurtured, should settle these questions of Titanic
proportions. It is well that where the serpent of treason assumes such
frightful dimensions, frightful from the great sin of the treason against
such a nation, that Herculean strength should be called upon to strangle
it. It is well that since so broad and conspicuous a theatre has been
assigned upon which to test man's capacity for self-government that
when the hour of final trial comes, the trial shall be as broad and
conspicuous as the theatre assigned to it, so that the great battle fought
and won once, is fought and won forever. Standing as we do to-night
upon that narrow isthmus of but two or three days which separates the
years that have passed from those years that are to come, it is natural
for us to pause and ask of each, What have the coming years in store
for us? I speak to you this night the language of exultant hope. Hope
for the great nation we love so justly 'and so much. Hope for our
country's future. Hope for ourselves and for our children And even
now, wandering in the thin uncertain light which I take to be the
promise of a rapidly approaching and glorious dawn, as with eager eyes,
we watch the moving clouds that yet overspread the sky, as we ask of
the watchmen stationed upon the watch towers and citadels of the
Union, 'Watchman what of the night?' the answer comes back to us,
strong and clear, and full of assuring hope 'All is well,' 'All is well,'
' All is well : ' and despite our early disasters and defeat, despite the
long and wearisome and sometimes almost disheartening delay, despite the
gloom that has overspread us, the cause of the Union, the cause of
good government everywhere, the cause of an advancing civilization
borne on the broad and ample shoulders of its worthy and heroic defen
ders, and upheld by the strong arms of the stalwart sons of the North
west, thank God, moves gloriously and nobly on.
" I have then no doubt as to the result of this mighty contest and
who can have ? I have no doubt but that the power of our Government
will assert itself in triumph. I have no doubt but that this the most wicked,
hellish and infernal rebellion which has ever blackened the annals of history
will be ground to powder. I have no doubt but that our national integrity
will be preserved. I have no doubt but that the Union of these States will
be restored and that the nation will emerge from the fiery trial through
which it has passed brighter and better and stronger than it has ever been •
before. It would be impossible however, that a conflict mighty as that from
which we are now I trust emerging, should not leave its deep and perma
nent impress upon our future national character. It will give tone to our
politics, our literature, and our feelings as a people for ages and ages to
come. A nation saved at such a tremendous expenditure of life and treasure,
whose title to the claims of nationality is written all over with the blood of
heroes, will think more highly of the privileges which it confers than it ever
IO8 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
thought before. Purchased at a price so dear, and rescued from destruction
at a cost so fearful, it will be valued accordingly, and preserve through all the
future, the name and privilege of an American citizen. Knowing how much
they have cost, they will be prized and cherished as they have always deserved
to be, but as they have never been. And so it will come to pass, that for
the times to come, the people, who make this nation's greatness and who
served it in its trial, will watch its interests with jealous eyes, and guard its
honor with an earnest and a lofty zeal. Then it will come to pass that the
mere politician shall no more trifle with its glory, trade away its honor,
or sacrifice its interests for the advancement of his selfish ends. While
genuine patriotism comes out of the fiery ordeal purified by its trials, the base
dross, which clamoring demagogues and politicians have imposed upon
the country heretofore, has been utterly consumed. We shall see when this
war is ended the demise of flunkeyism. Politics as I think will be lifted
from its old close and personal surroundings into the 'clear, pure, healthy
regions of genuine patriotic statesmanship. Our legislation infused with the
loftier spirit thus breathed into it will be characterized by a comprehensive
breadth, by a national vigor which it has not known for long years past.
Keeping steadily before it the great idea upon which the nation is rested,
and the complete triumph which it is the purpose of our national existence
to achieve, it will faithfully remember, and remembering, earnestly endeavor
to execute its high mission to its fullest purpose. WTe shall all the better
understand that fields may be tilled and cities builded and yet a nation not
be prosperous nor truly great. We shall well know that the nation itself is
of infinitely greater value than any special interests however highly we may
prize them, since we have learned that the full and perfect employment of
a41 these interests results from our great fundamental national idea, and
that when that perishes all else will perish with it. I am not claiming that
scoundrelism in politics will cease altogether at the close of the war. So
thoroughly chronic have scoundrelism and base selfishness become with some
of those who have hitherto disgraced the name of politics by calling them
selves politicians, that I fear the disease is altogether ineradicable in them.
What I do mean to say is this : that the people have always appreciated
the greatness of our nation and its value infinitely better than politicians as
a class have done ; that had its salvation been entrusted to politicians alone
it would have miserably perished the first year of the rebellion ; that the
loyal hearts and strong arms and earnest will of the people have saved it,
and that in the future they will watch the management of our national
affairs, and the conduct of our public men with a vigilance so keen as to
be a continuing terror to the demagogue and the mere partisan. Straight
forward honesty of purpose in the management of public affairs the
people of this country have always appreciated and always rewarded. Still
more will they do so in the future. I do not mean to say but that swindlers
will yet ask for place, nor that scoundrels will not occasionally steal into
office. Hereafter however this will be the exception. Our public men
will be inspired by higher motives. The people themselves will realize
OUR NATIONAL FUTURE. IOQ
"more completely than they have ever done before the value of this Union.
There will be greater care exercised in framing laws. And they will be
more scrupulously obeyed. These mighty convulsions are as necessary in
the moral and political as they are in the material world. When the air
is charged with Malaria and pestilence, the Almighty sends the thunder
storm, and the rain and the whirlwind. And in the commotion of the
elements which follows the air is cleansed and purified, and we can breathe
again with safety. And so by the thunders of this war has our political
atmosphere been so throbbed and convulsed, that it is vastly cleansed and
purified. The patriotic impulses of the people, which here only slumbered
thank God in the years past, have been thoroughly awakened by the rude
shock of war. And the old fires burn now as brightly as when our fathers
through the long and weary years, plucked this jeweled Continent from
foreign hands and gave it as a priceless treasure to us, their children, to
keep as the Ark of all good government, for all peoples for all time to
come.
" Not less marked or decided in character will be the impress which will be
left upon our national literature and our habits of thought. The meditations
of the philosopher : the dreams of the poet - the fancies of the romancer
will all years and years hence be colored by it and draw their inspiration
from it. Literature whether it be in the tomes of the philosopher or in the
song of the poet, has always, since the world began, drawn its holiest
inspiration and its clearest expression from patriotic feelings and impulses.
Since the blind old poet sang the contests between Hector and Achilles,
down to this very moment that literature which will live, because it is the
expression of the human heart wherever it may be, is that which clothes
one's country with all the beauties which . the lover sees in the mistress
whom he adores, and which ranks the heroes of the native land among
the good and great of the world.
"The poet is he 'whom the heart of man permanently accepts as a sin
ger of its own hopes, emotions and thoughts, and poetry is that song,' and
in what channels are the hopes emotions and thoughts of men more
constantly directed than the love of country and of home? Every other
emotion of the human heart may perish and die out, but this love of native
land will linger still. How its glory becomes our glory ; how its pride becomes
our pride ; how its disasters are made our own. This love of country is
one of the loftiest virtues which the Almighty has planted in the human
heart, and so treason against it has been considered among the most damn
ing sins. The History of the world teaches us that every great convul
sion like that through which we are now passing has given new life and
stimulus to intellectual exertion. Such wars as these tear up old formulas by
the roots and scatter the fetters which have bound the human mind in
special ruts and channels to the winds. The chariot wheels of war
break down most mercilessly old barriers ; and the thunder of battles, and
the bugle blast, summon from the deepest recesses of the human heart its
deepest feelings and emotions, and give to them an intensity and vigor of
expression which the summer days of peace may never know. Who when
IIO LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
he thinks of this our native land, of its glorious past, so brief yet so marvel
lously great, with its history thronging with names that have honored human
nature and added to the dignity of our common manhood ; of its mighty
physical resources ; of its vast territorial extent ; of its sublime present and the
promise of its future, but that feels the heart throb with quicker beat ; the
blood run with swifter course ; the feeling of inspiration changing our very
nature almost and lifting us far above the dull level of our ordinary thought.
And when added to that history of the past, and adding new lustre to
the promise of the future is the record of this mighty rebellion crushed ; who
can doubt, but that the literature of our country, embodying this grand and
ennobling experience, will in the years to come grow broader, higher, and
weightier, — the expression of a nation which has left behind the period of
joyous infancy, and attained through fierce tribulation the dignity and
gravity of a noble manhood ? I look for all these results, and many
more, to the great crisis which our nation is now passing through ; and I
look to its future with confident hope and expectations.
CHAPTER VIII.
LINCOLN'S EMANCIPATION PROCLAMATION.
SPEECH AT SYCAMORE, ILLINOIS, ON PRESIDENT LINCOLN'S EMANCIPATION
PROCLAMATION— THE PRESIDENT'S RIGHT TO ISSUE IT UNDER THE CON
STITUTION AND THE LAW OF NATIONS — SUSPENSION OF THE WRIT OF
HABEAS CORPUS — ARREST OF MR. VALLANDIGHAM — THE NEGRO AS A
SOLDIER.
THE proclamation of President Lincoln, issued in the fall of
the second year of the war, that in all such rebellious
States as had not returned to their allegiance by the first of
January, 1863, the slaves would be declared free, and capable of
enlistment into the Union armies, was of course met at the North
with a great deal of Copperhead opposition. As, at the outbreak
of the rebellion, Mr. Storrs condemned the action of those impul
sive fanatics who demanded of Mr. Lincoln the instant libera
tion of the Southern slaves by proclamation, heedless of the fact
that our armies then were in no condition to enforce any such
order, but were barely holding their own ground, so now, when
the sagacious President had seen that the time was ripe, that
the hour had come, and that such a proclamation would be not
a mere brutum fulmen but a thing possible to be carried into
effect with advantage to the Union cause, Mr. Storrs enthusias
tically endorsed the President's action, and zealously defended it.
He had to defend it on constitutional grounds, for the favor
ite argument of its Copperhead opponents was that the procla
mation, and indeed all the leading measures of the administration,
— the suspension of the writ of habeas corpus in disaffected locali
ties, the military arrests of Confederate sympathizers at the North,
the conscription law, and the use of negroes as soldiers, were
all unconstitutional.
1 1 1
112 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
A large and enthusiastic mass meeting was held in Chicago to
ratify the President's proclamation. The feeling called out by it
was intense, and while on the one hand the Copperhead element
were furious in their denunciation of it, all loyal men, and
especially all Republicans and all the old-time friends of the
slave, rejoiced over it as did the Jews over the proclamation of
Cyrus. There was not room enough in the hall where the ratifi
cation meeting was held to admit all who desired to be present.
A committee on resolutions was appointed, of which Mr. Storrs
was a member, and his hand is clearly discernible in the resolu
tions which were adopted. The first certainly was drawn by
him. It sets forth that the object for which the war was being
prosecuted was the preservation of our national unity and integ
rity ; that to secure that end the President, as Commander-in-
Chief, had the rightful power and authority to use all necessary
means to strengthen the arms of the government and weaken
and disable its enemies ; that the meeting recognized the procla
mation as a war measure, a means to secure the object for which
the war was prosecuted, and as such " alike warranted by the
constitution, justified by necessity, recognized by the rules and
usages of war, and which, if earnestly supported by the people
and enforced by our generals in the field, will 'result in so weak
ening the power of the rebellion as to insure the final triumph
of our arms and the restoration of the government." The third
declared the preservation of the Union to be paramount to all
other considerations, and pledged the meeting to support " any
and all means, recognized by the rules and usages of war, which
may be adopted by the Commander-in-Chief of our army and
navy to secure the success of our arms and the overthrow of
armed rebellion."
Mr. Storrs made an able speech in support of the resolutions,
defending the action of the President on constitutional grounds
and by the authority of international law, and closed with an
eloquent appeal to young men to stand by the government, and
to evince their patriotism by their actions. The report in the
local papers was wretchedly inadequate, but the Tribune said of it,
" His whole speech was an admirable production, and there
was frequent applause during its delivery."
He was invited to deliver the same argument over again at
LINCOLN'S EMANCIPATION PROCLAMATION. 113
Sycamore, Illinois, which he did in the middle of September.
1863, and this time arrangements had been made for a fair
report, which is here given :
" He began by saying that the questions he was about to discuss were
among the most important that any people was ever called upon to
consider; that these discussions could hardly be classed as political dis
cussions ; they were higher, and above politics. When a man whose
house is on fire counsels as to the best means of putting the fire out,
he would not be discussing politics ; neither is the question whether we shall
assist the government in the measures it sees fit to adopt for the preservation of
its existence. No man should decline to take sides in this controversy ; this is
no time for neutrality. My purpose in speaking to-night is to furnish some
reasons for the faith that is in me, some suggestions why the adminis
tration should receive from all parties the fullest, freest, most cordial
support. The public should at all times cherish a feeling of confidence
in its rulers ; especially should we now.
" I stand here to urge reasons why we should have the fullest confi
dence in this administration. I shall discuss from a legal stand-point the
leading measures of the administration, which are, the Emancipation
Proclamation of the President, the military arrests, the conscription law,
and the use of negroes as soldiers ; and I propose to prove each of
these measures strictly defensibe, not from the law of necessity, but on
the most strictly logical grounds. Now, it is our duty in times like
these to be extremely liberal toward an administration surrounded as ourj
is by such perils as never before environed a government, yet every
one of the acts named may be fearlessly submitted to the most rigid
criticism.
"The Emancipation Proclamation, we are told, is unconstitutional; that
it does no harm to the south, but divides the north. We are told that
the President has violated the constitution, and since he has now
changed the object of the war to a war for the destruction of slavery, we should
withdraw our support from his administration. It is not possible that
any constitution should prescribe all the rules by which a war should be
waged. Our constitution has done all that it was possible to do in
giving Congress power to declare war and suppress insurrection, and in
constituting the President Commander-in-Chief of the army and navy of
the nation. But how the war, when once declared, shall be waged, —
how invasion shall be repelled, and the means by which insurrection
shall be suppressed, — it has not attempted to define, and it would be
simply ridiculous to do so. There is, however, a system of laws made
by the common consent of nations determining all matters of this char
acter, to which we may refer for an answer to all these questions. I
mean the law of nations. The government cannot lay down rules for
the waging of war which would be binding upon England, nor can
England, by any rules of her own making, bind us. These are ques
tions which the people of no one nation by their organic law are com-
I 14 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
petent to settle, for the obvious reason that wars are waged between
different nations. The parties to be affected by these rules are nations ;
and hence, in making these rules, nations are the contracting parties.
Nor can one nation, by its fundamental law, or constitution, assume to
itself the right to determine in what manner a civil war shall be
waged, or a rebellion, when assuming sufficiently formidable proportions
to be called a civil war, shall be suppressed. These are determined as
well by the law of nations as the rules which govern independent
States in waging war with each other. Vattel declares that when a
rebellion assumes such formidable proportions as to make head against
the State, then it is a civil war, and both parties are regulated and
governed by the same rules which govern independent States at war
with each other. The question, then, so far as the proclamation of
Emancipation is concerned, is, Is the liberation of the slaves of the
enemy a means which the law of nations justifies the government in
using? For, if it be justified by the law of nations, then it is con
stitutional.
" The constitution confers authority to declare war and suppress insur
rection. In conferring that power, it also gives by a necessary implica
tion the right to use all those means, recognized by civilized nations, by
which war may be waged or insurrection suppressed, and hence the law
of nations is as much a part of the constitution as though written in
it. That the law of nations is a part of the great body of the common
law of this country was declared by the Continental Congress, and is a
doctrine which has since received the sanction of no less an authority
than Chancellor Kent. Now, Vattel declares that in waging a war we
have the right to deprive the enemy of every means which may augment
his strength or enable him to make war ; and again, that we may use
all those means which may tend to weaken the enemy or strengthen
ourselves ; and the whole doctrine is summed up by him in one sen
tence, — Right goes hand in hand with necessity and the exigencies of
the case. Whatever means, therefore, it is necessary to use, either to
weaken the enemy or strengthen ourselves, the government clearly has
the right to use. Who, then, is to judge of the necessity? Is it
Lincoln, or Vallandigham ? Upon the President of the United States, as
Commander-in-Chief of the army and navy, devolves the especial
duty to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States ; as
the head of our forces, on him devolves the responsibility of so using
them, of furnishing them with such means, of so augmenting their
strength, of so weakening the hands of the enemy whom they shall be
compelled to meet, that they may be successful in overcoming all resis
tance to the enforcement of the laws, and all attempts to overthrow the
government. It will require no argument to show that he upon whom
the responsibility and duty of accomplishing a particular end is devolved
is also clothed with full power to select such means as to him may
seem necessary to the accomplishment of that end. Plain, however, as
this proposition is, we are not left without authority. The Supreme
LINCOLN'S EMANCIPATION PROCLAMATION. 115
Court of the United States, as well as many of the most eminent
statesmen of our earlier history, have repeatedly declared the rule in
substance as I have stated it. The President, then, must have the
right to determine whether the liberation of the slaves is one of the
necessary means for the successful prosecution of the war. This right,
established as well by our own judicial decisions as by the law of
nations, must also be regarded as a part of the constitution. Hence, in
issuing that proclamation, the President did not suspend the constitution,
but called into life its powers against those in arms seeking to over
throw it.
"But can we not see that the means was necessary and proper?
Pollard, writing the Southern view of the rebellion, in his history of the
first year of the war, concludes by way of encouragement to rebels by
saying that thus far the war has proved that the system of slavery has
been an element of strength to the South, a faithful ally to • their
armies ; the slave has tilled their fields while his master has fought. It
is probable that Mr. Pollard is quite as well advised upon that subject
as his Copperhead friends at the North, and understands the subject
quite as well as they. If it has, then, been an element of strength to the
south, why not weaken or altogether destroy that element of their strength ?
If the slave has tilled while the master has fought, tilling is as neces
sary as fighting, and the slave has thereby been made as efficient an
enemy to the government as his master ; and if we have the right to
kill the fighting master, we have the same right to appropriate the ser
vices of the equally efficient tilling sjave. If the slave has hitherto been
a faithful ally to the South, the government surely has the right to
break up, if possible, the alliance, and I think to enter into the same
alliance itself. Even a Copperhead will probably not deny that if it is
constitutional for the South to form an alliance with the slave for the
purpose of destroying the government ; it is equally competent for the
government to form an alliance with the slave for the purpose of
saving itself. The Proclamation of Emancipation simply declares that after
a certain time therein named, and within certain territory, all slaves shall be
free, and that it shall be the duty of the government and its armies to
protect them in their freedom. This freedom of the slave is a complete
destruction of that element of Southern strength ; a complete severance
of the alliance between them and the Southern Confederacy. It is a
military measure, so declared by the proclamation itself; equivalent
to an order to every General in the field to liberate the slave where-
ever he may be found within the territory named. If it would be
constitutional actually to take possession of every slave, thus liberating
him and depriving the rebel master of his services, it must surely be
constitutional to order it done ; in other words, it must be constitutional
to attempt to do what it would be constitutional to succeed in doing. If
the proclamation would be constitutional provided it could be made com
pletely operative and effectual, the fact that to a certain extent it might be
Il6 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
ineffectual would not make it unconstitutional. In another light, however,
is the constitutionality of the proclamation clearly shown. The South
has always claimed, and the dictum of the Supreme Court in the Dred
Scott case plainly ' declares, that slaves are property. If so, there
can be no doubt but that the same right exists in our armies to take
it as any other kind or species of property. The right to deprive the
enemy of his goods and possessions, — of all those means which in any way
enable him to carry on a war, — is well established by the law of nations,
and is usually acted upon. If our armies have this right, it is because the
rules of civilised warfare accord it to them. The President is Commander-
in-Chief of those armies, and his proclamation is simply an order to the
armies under his command to do precisely that which all concede, without
such order, they would have the right to do. If it be constitutional for our
armies, without an express order, to liberate slaves, clearly it could not be
unconstitutional to order them so to do. The Constitution has made the
President Commander-in-Chief, and in so doing has necessarily clothed
him with all the power pertaining to that position. The Constitution creates
Judges, and fixes the period of their office ; and in thus creating the office
it confers all the power pertaining to it. The judicial acts of such an
officer within the range of his judicial duties are therefore constitutional,
not because the Constitution has especially provided the measure in which
those duties shall be discharged, but because in creating the office it has
given by a necessary implication the right to the use of all such means as
might be necessary to discharge its functions. So, too, in making the
President of the United States Commander-in-Chief of the armies, it has
given him the power to do all such acts as may be necessary to discharge
the duties of that position. As well might it be claimed that the punish
ment by a Judge of an individual for a contempt of court would be an
unconstitutional act, because the power so to punish was not specifically
conferred, as to say that the proclamation of emancipation is unconstitu
tional because the right to issue it is not specifically given. It can hardly
be claimed but that if actually in the field the Commander-in-Chief could
regulate the operations of our armies and control their movements. His
powers are none the less out of the field than in it. All other army
officers, of whatever grade, are subordinate to him ; and, regarded merely
as a military measure, the proclamation of emancipation simply declares
that after the expiration of a certain period of time the master shall no
longer control or have property in the slave, and it is an order issued by
one highest in command that military force shall be exerted to that end.
" It must be remembered in this connection that the government has the
right to demand the service of all its subjects for its own preservation. The
law of self-preservation, says Vattel, applies as well to nations as to indi
viduals. It is the duty of the government to protect all its citizens in the
enjoyment of their rights ; it is equally the duty of the citizen to protect the
government when its rights or existence are threatened or imperiled.
There can be no doubt but that the government could enforce the service
of the indentured apprentice, or of any person bound to service for any
LINCOLN'S EMANCIPATION PROCLAMATION. 1 1 7
period of time. If it have this right, and it cannot be dispuced that it has,
the length of serving can make no difference with its exercise. It would
have the right to draft into the armies men bound to service for ten years
as well as those bound for five. It could, therefore, annul a contract
requiring service for life, as well as for a certain number of years. In
other words, it could declare the relation of master and slave at an end as
well as the relation of master and apprentice. To deny the conclusion
would be to say that the government is at liberty to annul contracts
between its own citizens when the safety of the State demands it but can
not thus affect its enemies under a like emergency.
"But it is also insisted that slavery is a 'domestic institution/and therefore
the President has no more right to interfere with it than he would have to
interfere with the institution of marriage. It is said that Jeff. Davis might
with as much propriety issue a proclamation declaring all marriage contracts at
the North dissolved, as Lincoln could declare by proclamation all slaves
free. I fail to see the point or applicability of this illustration. We yet
consider every State in the Union as owing allegiance to the general gov
ernment, and the people of every State as owing obedience to its laws. To
compel that allegiance and to secure obedience to those laws, the war is
waged on our part. Lincoln is the constitutionally elected and rightful head
of the government, and it is his sworn duty to enforce the laws throughout
its entire territorial extent. On the other hand, Davis is a usurper. The
South, under the Constitution, is compelled to recognise the right of Lincoln
as the head of the government ; while, on the other hand, the North, and
indeed the whole country, are bound to deny and contest the right of Davis
to exercise authority over any portion of it. But slavery is quite a different
thing, I imagine, from the institution of marriage. I can see, clearly enough,
wide differences between the relations of husband and wife and master and
slave. The husband cannot sell the wife. He cannot mortgage her. He
cannot compel her to work in trenches nor upon fortifications. He has no
right of property in, nor any asserted ownership of her, while the master
has all these powers over the slave, and claims and uses him as property.
" The value of the slave to the cause of the rebellion rests upon these very
facts, and slavery is an element of strength in a military point of view
because of the absolute control which the master exercises over the slave.
" The power of the master to control the labor and services of the slave
once at an end, the institution, if it may be so called, so far from being an
element of strength to the rebellion and an ally to its arms, becomes rather
an element of weakness and an open enemy to its treason.
"If slavery is an institution, it is so simply because by the laws or cus
toms of the Southern States the master has the right of property in the
negro. This asserted right of property is all there is of slavery as an insti
tution. By the laws of South Carolina the ownership of negroes is as much
an institution as the ownership of horses, as by those local laws the rights
of the owner are in each case the same. But a difference is made between
these two institutions, in that the one is called ' domestic' and the other is
not. All that that amounts to is simply this, that the relations between the
Il8 LIFE OF EMERY A STORKS.
negro and his owner are domestic, while those existing between the horse
and his owner are not. I cannot see that this fact gives to the owner of
the negro any rights superior to those enjoyed by the owner of the horse.
If a Southern planter should, for instance, bring his pigs into his house, or
keep his horses under the same roof which sheltered his own family, the
relations between the planter and his pigs and horses might thereby be
sufficiently intimate and familiar to make them domestic ; but this govern
ment, I apprehend, would have the same right to take and appropriate the
horses or the pigs that it would have had they been treated as horses and
pigs usually are.
" The right thus to take them, and thereby break up those domestic rela
tions, rests upon the broad ground that they are property, and may be used
against the government ; and the right is none the less because the property
is considered as particularly valuable. In short, if slaves are to be regarded
as property, then the right of the government to take them, and the right
of the Commander-in-Chief to order them to be taken, are undisputed. If
not property, then the South has no right to complain. If the slave is not the
property of the master, then the master has no right to his services, and the
Commander-in-Chief must clearly have the right to prevent those services
being in any way used either to strengthen the hands of the rebellion
or to resist the armies of which the Commander-in-Chief is the head.
" Having discussed, as freely as time will permit, the constitutionality of the
proclamation, I proceed to consider the objections which have been urged
against the rightfulness of military arrests. It is claimed by the opponents
of the administration that the President has no constitutional right to sus
pend the writ of habeas corpus, nor has Congress that right, unless the
necessity actually exists, and that of the existence of that necessity the Courts
have the right, as against Congress, to determine. The right to suspend the
writ of habeas corpus is derived from that portion of the Constitution which
declares that 'the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be sus
pended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion, the public safety may
require it.' The precise meaning of this language is that the privilege of
the writ of habeas corpus may be suspended, when in cases of rebellion or
invasion the public safety may require it, but not in any other cases. Two
questions here arise, the first of which is, — By whom may the privilege of
the writ be suspended ? Second, — Who is to determine when the public
safety requires its suspension ?
"The right of the President to suspend the privilege of the writ is deduc-
ible, in my judgment, from the Constitution itself, from the history of the
particular clause in question, and from the necessities of the case. Now,
it is to be observed that the Constitution does not limit this right to any
particular branch of the government. It does not declare that Congress
shall not suspend the privilege of the writ, and if it did, it would certainly
carry with it the idea that no power but Congress could suspend it. That
the Convention which framed the Constitution did not intend to limit the
right to suspend the privilege of the writ to Congress alone, becomes the
more clearly apparent in view of the history of this clause. Mr. Pinckncy,
LINCOLN'S EMANCIPATION PROCLAMATION. 119
a delegate in that Convention, on the 27th of August, 1787, moved the
adoption of the following clause ; — ' The privileges and benefits of the writ
of habeas corpus shall be enjoyed in this government in the most expedi
tious and ample manner, and shall not be suspended by the legislature
except upon the most urgent and pressing occasions,' etc. This proposition
clearly indicated a disposition to limit the right of suspension to Congress
alone, and had it passed in that shape it would probably have been so
construed. But that the Convention did not intend thus to limit the exer
cise of this power is evidenced by the fact that the proposition of Mr.
Pinckney was not adopted by the Convention, but that Mr. Gouverneur
Morris moved instead that 'the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall
not be suspended unless when, in cases of rebellion or invasion, the public
safety may require it.1 This the Convention adopted, and thus it now
stands. The whole matter may then be thus summed up : The Convention
which framed the Constitution were asked to limit the right of suspending
the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus to Congress, which they refused
to do, — showing clearly that they did not intend to confine the exercise of
that power to Congress alone, but to repose it either in Congress or the
President, as the exigencies of the case might demand. But it is argued
that because this clause is found in that section of the Constitution which
is otherwise merely restrictive of the powers of Congress, that therefore this
shall be so considered. This is easily answered by the fact that the clause,
as it now stands, was proposed by Mr. Morris as a distinct and independ
ent proposition, was adopted as such, and not at the same time with the
other portions of the section in which it is embraced. It found its way
into that section not by any direct action of the Convention, but was
placed there by the 'committee of style and arrangement.' And this \vas
the whole duty of that committee. In this particular case, the impropriety
of inferring any particular intention of the Convention from the position
which the clause now holds is shown by recurring to the journal of the
Convention, from which it appears that Mr. Morris made the motion
expressly, and so it was adopted by the Convention, as an amendment to
the Judiciary article. There is nothing, therefore, either in the language
of the Constitution itself nor in fts contemporary history at all inconsistent
with the right of the President of the United States to suspend the privilege
of the writ of habeas corpus, when in cases of rebellion or invasion the
public safety may require it.
"There being, then, no special limitatiqn of the right to suspend the
privileges of the writ, it can, I think, be demonstrated that the President
as well as Congress must at times have that right. The object to be
accomplished is the preservation of the public safety ; but at the same time
the Constitution particularly declares that the public safety cannot be suffi
ciently jeopardized except in cases of rebellion or invasion. In no event,
therefore, except in cases of rebellion or invasion, can the privilege of the
writ be suspended ; and not then, unless the public safety may demand it.
The time when this power may be exercised is pointed out by the Constitu
tion. The purpose for which it may be thus exercised is also declared.
Indeed, the fixing of the time indicates the purposes to be achieved.
I2O LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
" If the doctrine contended for by the opponents of the administration
were correct, that Congress alone could suspend the \vrit, the very pur
pose and object of this important feature of the Constitution might be defeated.
The nation might be convulsed as it now is by a rebellion, or invaded by
foreign foes : the public safety might imperatively demand the suspension of
the writ of habeas corpus ; yet Congress might not be in session, and the
imperative demands of public safety would remain unanswered. The object
to be secured in cases of rebellion or invasion is the public safety. To this
end the Constitution has declared that the privilege of the writ may be sus
pended ; and in view of the fact that this suspension, if left to Congress
alone, might not be effected at such time as the public safety might require
it to be done, it has wisely left undetermined the question as to what par
ticular branch of the government shall exercise this power, leaving that to
be solved by the emergencies contemplated by the clause which conferred
the power. As representing the military arm of the government, — as being
the head of its armies, — and the necessities which call for the suspension
of the writ being in most cases of a military character, — it would seem
obvious that whenever Congress is not in session the President of the United
States must have the power to preserve the public safety in the manner
indicated by the Constitution.
"But who is to judge of the necessity which would justify the exercise
of this power? The character of the necessity is determined by the con
stitution ; namely, when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety
may require it. In such cases it is necessary, of course, before the privilege
of the writ can be suspended, that rebellion or invasion must exist as a
matter of fact ; and beyond that, the public safety must be so imperilled as
to make the suspension of the writ necessary to its preservation. Now, it
would be absurd to insist that the right to suspend the privilege of the writ
of habeas corpus should be exercised either by Congress or by the Presi
dent, but that the time when it should be done should be submitted to the
judiciary. Clearly enough, in clothing Congress or the President with the
right to suspend the privilege of the writ when its suspension becomes
necessary for the preservation of the public safety, the right of determining
the existence of that necessity must also rest either in Congress or the
President. To say that the Supreme Court has a supervisory control over
the exercise of this discretion is to deny its existence altogether elsewhere ;
for if, when the President exercises his discretion as to the necessity, the
Courts may supervise it, then it becomes not the President's discretion but
the discretion of the Court ; and the Constitution would be made to read
thus: — 'The writ of habeas corpus may be suspended by Congress or the
President in cases of rebellion or invasion, whenever the Supreme Court
shall deem such suspension necessary for the preservation of the public
safety.1
"It is alleged, however, that the arrests made by the government have
been an unconstitutional interference with the rights of the citizens, and that
no such arrests can be made in a community professedly loyal without the
process of law. The liberty of speech and the freedom of the press, we
LINCOLN S EMANCIPATION PROCLAMATION. 121
are told, have been invaded and trampled upon without justification or
necessity. The arrest of Vallandigham has excited more discussion than
any other, and upon that a direct issue has been made with the adminis
tration. This arrest is denounced on the ground that Vallandigham was not
connected either with the army or navy ; that Ohio is a loyal State, and
that war does not prevail there ; that no military operations were being
actively carried on there ; and that consequently martial law could not be
declared, nor could the laws of war be applied to any of its citizens not
actively engaged in the military service. But it is not true that the opera
tions of this war are confined to the immediate territory in which battles
are fought and armies are moved. There is war as well in Ohio as in
Virginia. Wherever there is any of the slightest opposition to the government
in the prosecution of the war, or the slightest assistance rendered to the
rebellion in its efforts to overthrow the government, there is war. In some
portions of the country, loyalty dominates and controls society. In others,
rebellion controls and dominates. There is no place so dark but that
some prayer is offered for the success of our cause ; there is no place so
light but that lurking treason may be found.
"The agencies invoked by this rebellion to its support are multiform. The
means which it uses to accomplish success are various. The rebellion
demands not only soldiers and cannon, and the ordinary implements of war,
but sympathy and argument to support its cause at home, to weaken its
enemies, and to give it dignity and support abroad. Whoever aids the
rebellion in either of these particulars; whoever, by speech or writing, con-,
tributes to the unity of its people, to the weakening of our own, to the
undermining of public confidence in our eventual success, to the with
holding of troops from the service, to their desertion when once engaged
in the service, is as much an enemy to the government and as much at
war with it as he who carries arms in his hands. Wherever such a con
dition of things exists there is insurrection, — there is war. Whoever engages
in such an enterprise is an insurgent. All these are the means which the
rebellion calls to its aid ; these are the elements which it enlists in
its behalf; these are the instruments by means of which, as well as by
armies, it wages war against the nation. All these helps combine to
make up the strength and power of the insurrection ; and we, therefore,
while at war with the insurrection, are at war with every part of it. Our
purpose is to cripple and destroy every element of its strength ; to meet and
overcome every means which it uses for the futherance of its designs. If
armies are arrayed against the government, we meet and crush them. If
the institution of slavery is used against the national life, we meet and
crush it. If seditious speech and seditious writing are used to weaken our
own strength and encourage and embolden the adversary, we meet and crush
that as well. All these agencies are parts of the insurrection, and we are
at war with every part of it. Whatever strengthens rebels weakens us ;
whatever encourages and emboldens them dispirits and disheartens us.
Wherever any of these means are used against us, there is insurrection ; and
wherever there is insurrection there is war. It would be strange indeed if
122 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
rebels should have greater rights against the government than the govern
ment possesses for its own defence.
"To me it appears that the right of the military power to arrest and
punish the citizen depends not upon the place where the alleged offence is
commited, but upon the nature of the offence. If Vallandigham, at Dayton,
discourages einlistments, encourages desertions, creates disaffection and
excites disco'ntent in the army, I can see no good reason why he has not
made himself as amenable to military trial and punishment as if the same
offence had been committed at Vicksburg or Chattanooga. What difference
is there in the nature of the offence and the consequences which flow from
it, — between persuading the soldier to desert by arguments addressed to him
in his camp and addressed to him from a distance? What difference is
there between actually going to the field where military operations are con
ducted, and enticing the soldier to desert, and remaining at home and
accomplishing the same object by writing him letters? Any step taken, any
means used which may weaken or tend to weaken the military arm of the
government, no matter where that step is taken or those means are used, is
an offence against the laws of war, and properly punished by those laws.
The laws of war prevail in time of war, and that military power may be
exerted to protect and preserve armies is, it seems to me, quite too clear to
admit of argument. The Supreme Court of the United States has said that
4 if war be actually levied,— that is, if a body of men be actually assembled
for the purpose of effecting by force a treasonable purpose — all those who
perform any part, however minute or however remote from the scene of
action, and who are actually leagued in the general conspiracy, are to be
considered as traitors.' The right of the President, therefore, to order the
arrest of such men as Vallandigham is embraced clearly within the scope
of his duties as Commander-in-Chief. Whenever, for the security of the
armies in the field, or the preservation of our strength at home, such arrests
become necessary, then let them be made. The freedom of speech and of
the press are indeed the highest privileges, but when these are used to over
throw the very government under which they are enjoyed, then they cease
to be rights, but are wrongs which assume the largest proportions and are
fruitful of the most alarming consequences. When Vallandigham roams
about the country, seeking by every means to excite popular discontent ; to
impair and weaken the efficiency of our arms ; to discourage enlistments ; to
encourage desertions ; to weaken ourselves and to strengthen the rebellion,
he is simply turning against the government the very privileges which he
derives from the government. I fail to see that Vallandigham possesses any
greater rights to stir up sedition among us here than he would have to work
to the same end were he in the rebel States. If Vallandigham should, as a
citizen of Virginia, endeavor to weaken our strength by speeches and by
publications, no one would doubt the right of the government to stop his
speaking whenever it could lay its hands upon him. I cannot understand
how it is that he has larger privileges in Ohio than in Virginia. I fail to see
that seditious speeches or conduct is any the less an offence when perpe
trated in Ohio, which is confessedly loyal, than when perpetrated in South
LINCOLN'S EMANCIPATION PROCLAMATION. 123
Carolina, which is confessedly disloyal ; and hence I say that in spouting
sedition in a loyal community, where converts to such sedition may be made,
Vallandigham is as guilty in fact and inflicts greater damage than he would
by seditious talk in a disloyal community, where no converts were to be
made. The President, as I have already said, is clothed with all the
powers of Commander-in-Chief. He may as well meet and overcome resis
tance to the government here as elsewhere. If such resistance is by
speaking or writing, he may overcome that by arresting and punishing the
seditious speaker or writer. This is precisely what has been done in the
case of Vallandigham. When brought before the court on the writ of
habeas corpus, the court refused his discharge on the ground that the
offence with which he was charged was one against the laws and usages
of war, against the military arm of the government, and therefore properly
cognizable by military tribunals. By a military tribunal he was tried, con
victed, and punished. Of his guilt there can be no doubt. He sought to
break up and destroy the army. He voluntarily and vauntingly brought
himself in conflict with the military arm of the nation, and he was crushed
in the encounter. .The military power being employed for the preservation
of the nation, and Vallandigham for its destruction, they met as inevitably
as the army of Pemberton met that of Grant at Vicksburg, and with like
results. If Mr. Vallandigham and his followers do not like the use of
military force against them, they had better not array themselves against
military force ; and whenever they choose to do so, they may be prepared
to take the consequences. .
"An opposition to the government as bitter and malignant as that which
proceeds from any other source is made on the ground of the employment
of negroes as soldiers. I am unable to see why it is not infinitely better
that the negro should fight for, rather than against us. There certainly can
be no legal objection to it, for, if we have the right to deprive the master
of the services of the negro, we clearly have as much right to require the
services of the negro in our own behalf as we have to command the
services of white men. I am not prepared to admit that the negro is
relieved from his responsibilities to aid the government because of his color.
I know of no provision in the Constitution which declares of what color our
armies shall be constituted. There being, then, no legal objection, it
becomes a question of policy merely, and to the past history of the nation
I appeal for the determination of that question. When I remember that
the first blood shed in the revolution was the blood of a negro, Crispus
Attucks; that at Bunker Hill negroes fought side by side with white men,
and that among the heroes of that day is Peter Salem, the negro ; that in
Massachusetts, negroes, bond and free, were enlisted in the Continental
armies ; that Connecticut passed laws for that very purpose, giving, as the
reward of such service, freedom to the slave ; that Rhode Island sent its
negro brigade, which fought under the eyes of Washington and Lafayette,,
and always with credit ; that more negroes were in the service of the coun
try, enlisted from the New England States, than there were white soldiers
124 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
from Georgia and South Carolina ; that the legislatures of Maryland, New
York, Pennsylvania, and Virginia authorized the enlistment of negroes, bond
and free, with the approbation of every general in our armies ; that by
direction of Congress Henry Laurens went to Georgia and South Carolina,
with all the aid which Washington could render him, to enlist negroes
there in the service of the country, — a step made necessary because neither
Georgia nor South Carolina had contributed their quota of troops ; that of
the army of Washington at Monmonth 755 were negroes; that during our last
war with Great Britain the services of the negro were again invoked ; that
one fourth of Perry's force at Lake Erie were negroes; that Jackson
enlisted them at New Orleans, promised them their freedom for their ser
vices, and faithfully kept his promise good ; and when, added to all these
teachings of our past history, I remember the services of the slaves at
Milliken's Bend, Port Hudson, and Fort Wagner, I prefer to base my
judgment as to the expediency and policy of this measure rather upon the
records of our history, the teachings of our experience, and the united testi
mony of the great men and the great events of our national career, than
upon the carping criticisms of the mere politicians, or thfi elegant conserva
tism of Governor Seymour and 'his friends.1 Washington, Jefferson, Adams,
Laurens, Greene, Lafayette, Hamilton, Jay, Knox, and Henry, of our
revolutionary history, — Jackson, Perry, Scott, and Van Rensselaer, in our
more modern history, — judged it wise to use the negro as a soldier, and
acted upon that judgment. Seymour, Vallandigham, Voorhees, and Single
ton think otherwise. I have no difficulty in making choice as to whom I
shall follow. I have 'already made my choice. I prefer the precedents of
our early history, and the teachings of the wise and great men who have
made that history glorious, to the sophisms of Seymour and his associates.
I shall act upon that preference in the future ; and I doubt not that the
great mass of the people will also.
CHAPTER IX,
A CELEBRATED LIBEL CASE.
1865.
A SOLDIER'S WIDOW COMPLAINS OF OPPRESSION — THE FACTS PUBLISHED
IN THE CHICAGO TIMES — THE TIMES SUED FOR LIBEL — MR. STORRS*
ARGUMENT FOR THE DEFENSE — A TERRIBLE FLAGELLATION OF THE
PLAINTIFF AND HIS WITNESSES — THE CASE ILLUSTRATED BY SCRIPTURE
PARABLES— APPEAL TO THE HUMANITY OF THE JURY— THE SUIT WITH
DRAWN AT THE CLOSE OF MR. STORRS* SPEECH.
IN 1865 Mr. Storrs was retained for the defense in an action
for libel brought by Judge Van H. Higgins against Wilbur
F. Storey, proprietor of the Chicago Times. The case excited
widespread interest, both from the prominent position in the commu
nity which the parties occupied, and from the peculiar nature of the
facts involved. It brought Mr. Storrs at once to the highest round of
popularity and eminence at the Chicago bar, and started him
with a well-earned and firmly established reputation upon that
brilliant career of professional prosperity which was so suddenly
terminated by his premature death. His management of the case
for the defense was marked by all the skill and ability which
characterized him in greater cases in later times ; and his closing
argument was such a terrible flagellation of the plaintiff and his
witnesses as had never been heard before in a Chicago court
room.
The suit grew out of the publication in the Times of an affida
vit made by the widow of a soldier named McMurray, who was
killed in one of the earliest battle of the rebellion. In the year
1855, Higgins had sold to Mr. McMurray three houses and lots
125
126 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
for $4800. He agreed to give him eight years to pay for them.
McMurray was a young man and had just been married. The
crash of 1857 came and prostrated all business, but McMurray
struggled along until he had paid $1600 in money and $3500 hi
improvements on the property. Then the civil war broke out, and
Higgins made an arrangement with McMurray by which the
latter was to join the army, and apply $100 a month out of his pay
towards the extinction of his debt to Higgins. Mrs. McMurray
had strong objections to this proposal ; she did not want her
husband to go to the war ; but her objections were so far over
come by Higgins promising to give her a house and lot in the
event of her husband's death, and to give him eight or nine
years more to pay in any event, that McMurray did go to the war.
His death followed in a short time. His dead body was brought
home, and buried in Chicago. In about six weeks afterwards,
Higgins commenced a suit to foreclose the contract, in his own
court, where he was one of the judges. A decree \vas rendered
against the poor widow, and the property sold, Higgins becom
ing the purchaser. He sold the certificate of purchase to a Mrs.
McDonald, whom he owed. After the expiration of the time
of redemption he filed a petition for a writ of possession. Mrs.
McMurray opposed the petition by filing counter affidavits
showing the facts, and the judge who heard the case denied the
petition and refused the writ of possession. The case attracted
the attention of Mr. Storey, and the widow's statement, or the
substance of it, was published in the Times. Judge Higgins
thereupon brought suit against Mr. Storey for libel. The defense
svas the general issue, or a plea of not guilty, and one of justi
fication ; that the defendant published the statement with good
motives for justifiable ends, and that he had a right to believe
that it was true.
The case was tried before Judge Williams in the Circuit Court.
The room was crowded thoughout the trial ; the patriotic feelings
aroused by the war lending special interest to this case. Mr. Storrs'
closing argument for the defense was delivered on the day after
a national Thanksgiving for the success of the Union arms ; and
every word was listened to with eager and earnest attention. He
began as follows :
"The rest which yesterday's intermission afforded us from this very
A CELEBRATED LIBEL CASE. 1 2/
•wearisome and protracted trial, was, I presume, quite as grateful to your
selves as it certainly was to me. It seems eminently fitting and appropriate, after
we have spent one day of thanksgiving for the many blessings which
the patriotism and sacrifices of our soldiers have secured to us, that we
should come together this bright and beautiful morning further to con
sider and finally to decide a case, the result of which will determine in
just what estimation we really and substantially hold these services.
"The custom of an annual thanksgiving is as old as our history, and
it is as beautiful as it is old. It is then that families which have long
been separated come together under the old roof-tree and the fires of
affection are relighted about all our homes. It is then that the old
domestic associations are revived, and those better and nobler emotions,
which a year's contact with the world may have nearly buried, are
again renewed ; and I am sure that yesterday, while you were home
around your abundant boards, while you had cause for rejoicing in the
comforts around you, you did not forget the poor and sorrowing whom
we have always with us. Yesterday's thanksgiving was one of a pecu
liar character, and the reasons for our rejoicings were of a particular
and especial nature. We have passed through four years of war, and the
dark clouds which have hung over our country for all that time have
finally been lifted and riven. Our nation has been saved, and the sil
ken banners of peace are unfurled over all the republic. The Almighty-
has carried us through the perils of a great rebellion. The great prin
ciple of self-government has been vindicated on this continent, and
its blessings will be perpetuated for ages to come. It is for these things
we felt devout and thankful yesterday, and also to the soldiers who
bared their breasts and periled their lives that this nation might be
saved. Our rejoicing was not unmixed with pain, for we could not
help remembering that there were vacancies in many a family circle,
and that many a fireside was wreathed with mourning. We could not
help remembering that the sable wreaths' of woe shadowed many a
home, into which should no more enter the father, the husband, the
brother, or the son, who would never more respond to the call for the
annual festival of love and affection. And I am sure that in all our
Western homes, while we sorrowed with those who thus sorrowed, and
while we honored the living brave, we did not forget the glorious
dead ; I am sure that in our thanksgiving yesterday we did honor to
them, and that we will not cease to remember and to honor, for all
time to come, those soldiers, and the blessings and the name they have
left behind them. And I doubt not that yesterday many of you, and
perhaps all of you, thought of the families of those soldiers, — of the soldier's
widow, soldier's child, and particular)' of this woman, and how many claims
she had upon our sympathy, upon our kindest regards and our tender-
est affection. And you might, perhaps, have drawn two contrasting
pictures yesterday ; the one showing the plaintiff in his luxurious and
well-appointed home with his family all about him in a proper attitude
128 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
for devotion and thanksgiving, or in a spacious church, where the sub
dued light came streaming in through stained windows upon cushioned
seats and gilded prayer-book, joining in the exercises appropriate to the
day and the occasion, thanking God that such as McMurray had secured
to him the blessings of a quiet country and a peaceful home ; and,
amid the pealing harmonies of the organ, leaving the lofty sanctuary,
satisfied that he had violated no statute, and that he had studiously
observed all the decorous proprieties of life. On the other hand was
this poor, smitten, helpless, childless woman, in an obscure and remote
portion of the city. Thanksgiving had no charms for her, because it
revived in her the memory of her great loss, and with bowed head and
streaming eyes she knelt before God in her lonely room. It was not
without hope that she thanked God that her husband had died in a
cause so noble, and she only asked that that justice to which she was
well entitled from this people and community should be meted out to
her, and that her cause should be vindicated by this jury. For it is
her cause. The record tells you that Judge Higgins is the plaintiff, and
that Storey and Worden are the defendants ; but your hearts tell you
that this woman is the plaintiff, and that Higgins is the defendant. If
a stranger had been in this court while this trial was in progress, and
he had never examined the record, could he have come to any other
conclusion ? The simple question to be decided is whether this woman
has been justly treated by this man. These defendants here are merely
nominal defendants. They are made defendants because they have
espoused the widow's cause, and because they dared to give to the
public the facts in her case, and to ask that the public punish the man
who has so outrageously wronged her. That is the position that they
hold in this case. They represent the widow ; and if you say that they
are not guilty, but that they have done right in exposing to the eyes
of the public the wrongs which that woman has suffered, then you
vindicate the cause of the ' soldier's widow, and you assert the better
cause of common humanity and honorable dealings between man and
man."
After recapitulating the circumstances out of which the
trouble between Mrs. McMurray and Higgins arose, and in
which the trouble between Higgins and the Times originated,
Mr. Storrs said : —
"The substantial facts that we have alleged in our justification are,
that Higgins induced McMurray to go to the war under promise of pro
tection to his family ; that he agreed to give him eight or nine years
in any event to pay for the property ; that, in the event of his death,
he would secure to his widow one of the houses and lots ; that
McMurray died, and Higgins, in violation of his promise, soon after
commenced a suit in his own court to foreclose the contract, and has
tened it to a decree ; that Higgins purchased the property under the
A CELEBRATED LIBEL CASE.
decree, the widow having a year in which to redeem ; that the widow
employed Wilson and Asay as her counsel to take the case to the
Supreme Court, and that they were going to take it there, but were
prevented from doing so by Higgins agreeing to find a purchaser who
would pay #400 for the right of redemption ; that Higgins violated this
promise, and a petition for a writ of possession was filed, and argued
and refused. These are the facts we have substantially set up in our
plea, and the facts we are called upon to investigate.
"Now, one step further, for it will aid us in our investigation if we
understand which of these facts are controverted. That Higgins com
menced suit in his own court for the foreclosure of the contract and
obtained a decree, is proved by the record of the court. It is shown
by the bill filed, and by all the proofs in the case, and is not denied
here ; and therefore we need not trouble ourselves any further about
that. That he obtained a decree in his own court is a fact patent in
the case to every one. That he purchased the property under that
decree is shown by the record, and is not denied. That Wilson and
Asay* were employed to take the case to the Supreme Court is not
denied. That Higgins promised to* find a purchaser who would pay
£400, for the right of redemption is proved by Judge \Vilson, and is not
attempted to be denied. That he violated that promise is also proved
by Judge Wilson, and is a fact uncontradicted and uncontradictable by
the facts in this case. That the petition for the writ of possession is
filed is proved by the writ itself. That it was resisted and denied is
proved by the affidavits on file, and by Judge Wilson, and it is not
denied. These are the uncontroverted facts.
There are but three facts about which there is any dispute ; just three
facts. WTe have sifted the vast volume of chaff out of this case, and
now we have got at the heart of it, and can see precisely what is
necessary for us to discuss, and what you are called upon to consider.
The first controverted fact of any importance in this case, — the first question
about which any dispute arises, — is, Did Higgins induce McMurray to go to
the war? The second is, Did he promise to be a brother and a protector
to his family, and to give her one of the houses and lots in the event of
his death, and eight or nine years to pay for them all in any event? And,
third*, Was this suit hastened to a decree ?
These are all the controverted facts in the case. There are no other facts
that are disputed, or about which there can be any dispute. Now, then,
all three facts which we have set forth in our plea are proved by Mrs.
McMurray. It therefore becomes a vital question in that connection, Is she
entitled to belief? In the first place, Are the probabilities in favor of the
story which she tells? And in the next place, Is there any improbability
about the story which she tells? She tells you that, soon after the war
broke out, Higgins commenced going to her house ; that she saw him there
three or four times ; that her husband had not made up his mind to go to the
war then ; that she did not wish him to go, and was persistent in her objection
to it ; that she feared that she would not be taken care of ; that she had a
I3O LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
sick child, and another one was about to be born ; and that her husband,
anxious to soothe her fears and calm her anxieties, proposed to give her
an introduction to Higgins, for the purpose of having added to his efforts
the more persuasive eloquence of Judge Higgins ; and accordingly, for that
purpose, he took his wife down town, and they met Judge Higgins on the
street. They talked to him about McMurray going to the war, and she
said she did not want her husband to go. Higgins tells her that it will
be a very short war, and that there is not going to be much danger ;
that it will blow over in a little while ; that McMurray is about as safe
in the army as he is at home, and that if he goes it will enable him
to pay off the incumbrances upon the property ; and then he says, ' I
will be a brother and a protector to you ; I will take care of you, if
you are not extravagant.' She is soothed, but not altogether satisfied;
and, a few days after, they go to Van H. Higgins' house. Mr. McMurray
desired that some settlement should be made between him and Higgins, so
that he could leave his affairs entirely in safety, and she desired to know
first what position it would leave her in. Higgins again tells her that the
war is going to be a short one, and he called her attention to the uncer
tainty of human life and the certainty of death. He says that all
must die, and that all may die at any time ; that McMurray may
die if he stays at home. He says that the war is going to be a
short one, and that there is not much danger ; that if McMurray
goes to the war, he can earn $120 a month as Captain in the Jackson
Guards, and, says he, 'You can give me $100 a month, and keep $20
for yourself, and let your wife have the rents, and everything shall be
happy. If any accident happens, your wife shall have one of the houses
and lots, and if you come back, you shall have eight or ' nine years more
to pay for the property in.' Thus assured, he was satisfied, and he goes
to the war. This is her story, and the counsel tell us that this story is not
probable. They say it is not natural that Van H. Higgins should have
iuduced this man to go to the war in this way, because there was no
trouble in raising soldiers at that time ; and Mr. Swett in this connection
has spoken to you about the magnificent enthusiasm of the people in 1861.
Why, then, forget that we did not say that he induced him to go to
the war from motives of patriotism. We have never charged any such
thing as that upon him. We could not have proved it. We do not
pretend that any mere motives of patriotism induced him to persuade
McMurray to go to the war. What was his motive ? What are the
probabilities of this story? McMurray owed him 'moneys,' and Higgins
wanted his pay. He saw that the profession of the law was going to
be prostrated, and it has been. He desired McMurray to go to the war
and earn #120 a month, and pay him £100 of it. That was the
arrangement and agreement between the parties, and that was a sufficient
motive to animate the plaintiff in this case to induce McMurray to go
to the war. What motive had McMurray for going? Do they intend to
say that all his motive was that he might pay on his property, and
get it clear? Do they intend to claim that Van H. Higgins had all
A CELEBRATED LIBEL CASE. 131
the patriotism and that McMurray had none? I have no doubt that he
was inspired, to a certain extent, by that same spirit of patriotism which
animated so many to offer their lives in the defence of their country.
He loved his adopted country. But there were his wife and children,
and just between them there stood this land contract with Higgins.
When he thought of his country he desired to go. When he thought
of the condition of his wife and children, he saw that he could not go.
That contract loomed up before him in all its great proportions. But
when he is told that he could go and leave that, that if he dies his
wife shall have a home, and that he shall have more time to pay for
it all in any event, that turns the scale, and he concludes that he will
go. And upon this fact, there being no contradition, it must be taken
as proved. It is proved from the testimony, and from the inherent
probabilities of the case, that Higgins induced McMurray to go to the
war.
" Now there is another feature to which I wish to call your attention. We
desired to show by the declarations that McMurray made to his wife that
these were the determining motives with him ; that he had not decided to
go until this arrangement was made with Higgins. But we were stopped
by the plaintiff. \Ve find no fault with that. But it is curious, if McMur
ray was animated by some other motive than that which wre showed, that,
out of the hundreds and almost thousands of friends whom McMurray had
in this city, some witness could not have been grubbed up out of the earth
to testify to it in the interests of the plaintiff in this case.
"The next queston is, Did he promise to give her one of the houses and
lots in the event of her husband being killed in the war? I shall not detail
the testimony of Mrs. McMurray upon this point, for it is not necessary ;
for every fact in evidence but sustains and confirms it, and there is nothing
improbable or unnatural in the fact to which she swears. This property
was sold to McMurray when prices were inflated. He had paid Higgins
#1500, or $1600 upon the lots, and had expended some £3500 on improve
ments. Now, Van H. Higgins could afford to do this. He could afford to
give that woman one of the houses and lots in the event of her hus
band's death, because he would have had $1600 in money and the improve
ments on the other two lots. In addition to that, he had productive property
instead of unproductive. What improbability is there, then, about the story
which this woman tells ? Is it so unnatural an affair as to be improbable ?
Does our every day experience run in such a line as that it affords
us no cases where a creditor can give, in a case of this kind, a portion of
the property to the widow of his debtor, for which he has been paid, and
he to derive the benefits of the improvements which they have placed upon
the other portions of the property, because the strict letter of his contract
gave him a right to something more ? Has it come to this, that our experi
ence furnishes no such examples as that? I trust not. This house was
turned around before he left. Mr. McMurray tells Higgins so. He separates
it and sets it apart from the others by fences. That marks the character
which he affixed to that particular portion. It shows that *he understood
132 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
what his wife understood, and that they all understood that that part of it
was distinct from the rest, and to belong at all events to McMurray's wife
if he died.
" They offered to prove in this case that McMurray did make such an
agreement with Van H. Higgins ; that the widow told Chase that her hus
band informed her that Van H. Higgins offered to give her this house and
lot. And this proof comes from them, that this promise had been made to
McMurray, and that the woman so understood it. But let us see what this
amounts to. Why is it that they all the while offer to prove these offers
of Van H. Higgins to do something equivalent to this promise, and yet
deny that any such promise existed ? Why do they undertake to deny the
promise, and at the same time attempt to prove a performance of the
agreement? Every offer of that kind is an absolute admission of this
agreement. He offers to show that he offered to give this woman this lot
and a life-lease of another lot. Does it not show that she had a right to
that lot? And they have carried their offers all the way through; and
counsel tell you, and have argued to the court, that Van H. Higgins pro
posed to give an equivalent! An equivalent for what? Why, for the house
and lot he had promised this woman. If a man comes into court and says
fairly to the jury, ' True it is that I agreed to give this woman this house
and lot, but, when the time came, I could not do it ; but I offered her
another just as good, I will do the best I can for her,' by the offer he
makes he affirms the existence of the original agreement. Do you believe
that their case is made of excuses and apologies for not being charitable ?
No, not at all. They offer in evidence Higgins' financial condition. \Vhat
for ? To show that he was not able to fulfill his agreement ; to show that
he could not execute his agreement. Every offer of this kind admits 'this
promise. They have endeavored to show that the contract was assigned to
Mr. Keenan of New York. Why ? For the purpose of showing that he
could not deed his house to that woman because he held the assignment.
It is another »excuse ; and so it is excuse after excuse all the way through,
from the time the case commenced till the hour it closed, why he did not
carry out that agreement. Now the question in this case for you to pass
upon is not whether he did the best he could, but whether he made this
agreement. But when he says he did the best he could, — that he offered
'equivalents,' — he admits the agreement, and it settles the question in issue
for all time to come."
Mr. Storrs then reviewed the foreclosure proceedings, to sub
stantiate the charge that that suit had been 'hastened' to a decree.
On that point he said :
'•You must remember that this was a suit in chancery. I hope that none
of you have ever been so unfortunate as to be complainants or defendants
in a chancery suit, but you may all know how tedious and long they are.
The celebrated case of Jarndyce v. Jarndyce, which has been reported
by Dickens in one of his novels, is an illustration of the slow and weari
some length which characterizes them. Why, in the old country, and in
A CELEBRATED LIBEL CASE. 133
the older portions of this country, if a man gets involved in a chancery suit,
he gives up his life to it and passes it down to his children for generation
after generation, and it keeps growing bigger and bigger all the time. It
is like the widow's cruise of oil, which was never exhausted. It is like the
miraculous loaves and fishes, of which, after feeding multitudes, there was
enough left to feed multitudes more. The most self-sustaining, self-supply
ing, self-supporting, self-procreating institution in this world, is a chancery
suit. Generally they last for years upon years, but the plaintiff in this
suit tried a chancery suit in about the quickest time, I think, that has
ever been witnessed in the annals of chancery practice. It was a Suit
for the foreclosure of a contract for the purchase of land. It was
commenced on the 23d of October, and the service was made in
November, just as quick as they could get the officers of the court to
do it. They found that they had not defendants enough. Two of them
were infants ; one of them was born after the suit was commenced, and
they make him a defendant and amend the bill, and serve process by
leaving at the house. Both die out of the case before its close. Keenan
was absent, aud they have to make publication for him, according to the
requirements of the statute. That is a delay occasioned by the statute.
The moment the time is up, an order for a default is made against
him, and then they go right on, and on the I2th of December, 1863, a
decree is entered in this case. The parties have changed during the
progress of the cause. Two defendants die out of the cause, and one is
born in. A large amount of testimony is taken. Did not the plaintiff
in this suit hasten that suit to a decree in his own court ? And, at the
very earliest opportunity, the land was advertised to be sold, and it
was sold on the day it was advertised to be. There were none of the
usual adjournments of sale, no postponement. It was all bid in by Van
H. Higgins, with ten days time to the widow to redeem — ten days in
which to pay for this house and lot; ten days' time to pay for that
for which this slaughtered hero was to have eight or nine years. Is not
the case complete? Do not the facts cover the whole ground of con
troversy in this case?"
Mr. Storrs next addressed himself to the plaintiff's witnesses,
whom he scored unmercifully, one of them in particular, a Mr.
Rourke, who had been attorney for the widow in some matters,
but now appeared as a witness for the other side.
The methods of the defence were next discussed.
" I come now to another branch of this case, and that is, the discussion
of Van H. Higgins personally. It cannot be objected that we indulge in
personal observations of this kind. A libel suit is a personal suit. He
sets up his character, and says, ' Here it is, — what there is of it ; how
much is it worth?' If the plantiff can separate his character from him
self, I will talk about his character and not about him ; but inasmuch
as he has brought them both into court, it devolves upon you and me
134 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
and all of us to see what that character is. The manner of defending him
has been a most curious one ; they have defended him by offers. His
humanity has been talked of. He has been charged with oppression of
a weak and defenceless woman. They offer to prove that he was a
humane gentleman, because he said he was ; and, because they cannot
violate every rule of evidence in the world, they come whining into
court and complain that their case has been cut off in the middle.
Why, it has been one of the most funereal entertainments that I have
ever witnessed. It reminded me of that description in the olden days
of the world, when the daughters of Babylon sat down and wept. They
first call a witness to prove a fact ; he swears against them ; and then
they make another offer to prove it, which is ruled out, and the
mourners go about the streets bewailing their misfortunes. And now they
tell us they will get the verdict of future generations. Gentlemen, I shall be
satisfied with the verdict of this generation, with the verdict of this jury.
I am living now ; I do not expect to live in future generations. Storey
is living now ; he does not expect to live in future generations, nor
does this poor woman. I will make the exchange which the gentlemen
wish and propose. I am willing that in future generations they shall try
for a verdict ; I want one now.
"They find a good deal of fault with the rules of evidence, and they think
that they pick out of this justification one or two immaterial facts, utterly
without bearing on the question at issue ; and they say that, because these
have not been literally established, therefore they are entitled to a verdict
against us. There was a case tried in New York, in Orleans county,
which seems to me to be somew.hat of an illustration of their position. A
gentleman of a smoky and measly kind of character went to Noah Davis.
The client had been charged with stealing hams, and Davis commenced a
slander suit for him. After it had been commenced, Davis found out what
sort of a man he was, and did not want to try it. When the trial came
on he went to Davis' office with a large number of witnesses. Davis asked
what they were for. He said, 'They are to prove my character.' 'I do
not want them;' said Davis; 'I am going to admit in the opening that
you stole shoulders ; when they charge you with stealing hams, I am after
them.' And so it is in this case. They think that, because she said that
her child died on the day this case was set for hearing, and was actually
dead, they are entitled to a verdict at your hands. This is a question, not
of statutes, not about the ordinances of the city of Chicago ; it is a ques
tion of ordinary humanity ; it is a question as to the estimate in which you,
as men, hold transactions of this kind. The question is, whether Van H.
Higgins has treated this woman justly or unjustly, not by the statute of
frauds ; not by ordinances of the city of Chicago ; not by any statute at
law ; but by the great higher law that resides in the consciences of men,
that is older than constitutions, and will live when all constitutions have
failed ; that was born when the earth was created in its infant sleep, and
will live until the latest syllable of recorded time ; a law which no man
can mistake, and which the Saviour of the world, more than eighteen him-
A CELEBRATED LIBEL CASE. 135
dred years ago, died to vindicate, — the law that we should 'love one
another' and be just to one another. Has Van H. Higgins treated this
woman humanely, or has he oppressed her?
"And now, who is the woman? When she was upon the stand and told
you she was about thirty-two years of age, were you not astonished at the
statement ? When you saw the woman herself, — that haggard face, the deep
lines that sorrow and trouble had plowed in it, — did you not see in her an
object that the heart of a man might well pity, and for which it might well
bleed ? Has that poor woman, more than 4,000 miles away from kindred
and home, her husband martyred and in his grave, her little children in
their long homes, — has , that poor woman, friendless, weak, defenceless,
houseless and alone, been treated as she ought to be? It is a question of
the great humanities which shall live for ever ; it is a question which appeals
to the human heart, which beats for ever, when it is right, against oppres
sion and inhumanity and injustice.
" Let us open again the sickening records of this tale. It is the saddest tale
that was ever written. Her husband died. A short time after his death, this
man, who was to be the brother and protector of this woman, called upon
her in the agony of her grief and demanded the possession of the property
which belonged to her ; and she implored him by everything that is most
sacred, by her husband in his grave, by her child dying in her arms, by
every consideration which would naturally touch the heart of a man and
melt it into pity, if it were not of stone, to be kind to her. He was not.
He filed his bill in his own court on the 22d of October, 1861. The sods
had not sunken upon her husband's grave, the headstones were not raised
above the graves of her children, her heart was yet in the midnight black
ness of its desolation, when this 'brother' and this 'protector,' instead of
being the minister of pity, instead of sending kindly words of sympathy,
sends to her the sheriff, with 'the people of the State of Illinois, greeting!'
This was on the 22d of October, 1861. I care not if he never made her
a promise ; I care not if he was under no obligations to her at all. In that
widow's suffering, and in the sight of that widow's grief, that was the
basest deed — the cruelest of deeds.
' I would rather be a dog, and bay the moon,
Than such a Roman.'
"This poor, lone, friendless woman, in the depth of her desolation, and
her home, her husband, and -her children gone, is met by her 'brother*
and her 'protector' sending the sheriff with a process of law into her house.
"And that is the way this tragedy begins!
" And then, gentlemen, after she has demanded her rights of Higgins, and
he has refused to give them, what next? Just as she is about to become a
mother again, he prepares a petition addressed to the citizens of Chicago,
soliciting their charity in his behalf! He sends this woman, who was con
fined within a week, up and down the alleys and through the by-ways of
this great city, — she whom he had promised to protect and defend — a men
dicant and a beggar! And they claim some consideration in this case
I 36 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
J v
because he thus sent this woman soliciting alms about the city, begging for
money to give to him. She was to go to the charitably inclined people of
this city, to go about telling her sorrows, re-opening her wounds, exhibiting
her griefs and making them public, in the broad, clear day, that Van H.
Higgins might have #800! I shall be cautious, and you should be, gentle
men, hereafter, how you give alms. If a one-legged, one-armed man comes
to your house to beg a meal of victuals, ask him if he has a land contract
with Van H. Higgins. You do not know but that what you give will be
carried to his house. And when you see a blind man on the cars, distrib
uting his verses, ask him if he has been foreclosed ; ask him for whom he
is collecting — whether it is for his little boy or for scyne decorous and respect
able gentleman who takes interest at 10 per cent. ! " (Sensation in the court
room.)
Mr: Storrs then read the document in question, making com
ments upon its expressions as he went along.
" Now, gentlemen, here is the appeal in which all the claims are set
forth, and here is the appeal specific setting forth the fact that she wants
this money to pay a claim upon her homestead, and she 'will ever pray.'
Accordingly with documents of this kind, beginning and ending with a bill
in chancery, he starts this woman about the city, soliciting alms for him.
After this petition had been circulated, the women was taken sick. She
raised $50 from Mr. Scripps, and used it to defray the expenses of her con
finement : and shortly after that Higgins makes his advent again. This was
at the time her child was dying in her arms, and she prays and implores
him for mercy. She gets it not. He goes in a few days after, and again
demands the property. She again argues and pleads for mercy, and he again
refuses it. He goes away and leaves her in her sorrow, and then, as a climax,
files his bill. And that bill is a curious document. It sets forth that all that
had been paid upon the contract was $880, when, as you know, McMurray had
paid $1520. Judge Gray says that he called upon Higgins to know how much
had been paid, and could not get the facts. Higgins knew how much had been
paid. On the iyth of June, before this statement was made, he knew that #1520
had been paid. But after this statement had been made, and these receipts
given, he conceals the truth, and starts out with that false statement in his bill.
What next does he do? He asks the court for a forfeiture of these payments,
and demands that in the general statement of these affairs, this poor woman
shall not have credit for them. Now, gentlemen, it was in a court of equity,
which abhors these forfeitures, and it will never grant them if it can be avoided.
Judge Story has said, ' Law as a science, would be unworthy of the name, if it
did not to some extent, furnish the means of preventing the results of rashness
and blind confidence on one side, and avarice and cunning on the other.'
He not only belies the payments, but he demands their forfeiture, — as hard and
cruel a thing as can be asked of any court. But what more ? Does he
relent at all? He asks that this foreclosure be a strict one, and it is, so
far as these two lots are concerned, a strict one.
Why did he file a bill at all? They say, because he was in debt. Now,
A CELEBRATED LIBEL CASE. 137
because a man is in debt is a very poor reason why he should not keep
his agreement. If Higgins owed a million dollars, it was no reason why
he should violate his solemn promises to this woman. He should be just
and true, and keep his faith with her. He was in debt to the extent of a
quarter of a million dollars, but his creditors did not do anything of that
kind with him. And in their spirit of forbearance he should have treated
her. I have from the old Book a case in point. Higgins' creditors did
not foreclose upon him ; he did foreclose upon her. And now, I want to
show you how, in the early history of the world, these acts were treated.
The case to which I call your attention is reported in the 1 8th chapter of
the gospel according to St. Matthew. His own witness, and his agent, who
ke.pt his accounts, Mr. Wright, tells us, 'I thought he was a bankrupt.
None of his creditors came upon him, nor did I hear about any of them
foreclosing.' "
Mr. VAN ARMAN : "You should read your law to the court."
Mr. STORKS: "This is the higher law, and properly goes to the jury.
It is the language of our Saviour in answer to the apostle Peter, and
reads thus:
" ' Therefore is the kingdom of heaven likened unto a certain king, which
would take account of his servants. And when he had begun to reckon, one was
brought unto him, which owed him ten thousand talents. But forasmuch
as he had not to pay, his lord commanded him to be sold, and his wife
and children, and all that he had, and payment to be made. The servant
therefore fell down, and worshiped him, saying, Lord, have patience with
me, and I will pay thee all. Then the lord of that servant was moved
with compassion, and loosed him, and forgave him the debt. But the same
servant went out, and found one of his fellow-servants which owed him an
hundred pence ; and he laid hands on him, and took him by the throat,
saying, Pay me that thou owest. And his fellow-servant fell down at his
feet, and besought him, saying, Have patience with me, and I will pay thee
all. And he would not ; but went and cast him into prison, till he should
pay the debt. So when his fellow-servants saw what was done, they were
very sorry, and came and told unto their lord all that was done. Then his
lord, after that he had called him, said unto him, O thcu wicked servant,
I forgave thee all that debt, because thou desiredst me. Shouldst not thou
also have had compassion upon thy fellow-servant, even as I had pity on
thee? And his lord was wroth, and delivered him to the tormentors till
he should pay all that was due unto him.'
" Now, .that was just exactly such a case as this. There the lord of that
kingdom, whose servant owed him ten thousand talents, cancels his debt,
and lets him go ; and then there is the debtor, not grateful as he ought to
be for the kindness bestowed upon him, who goes out in the streets, and,
seeing a man who owed him a miserable hundred pence, takes his debtor
by the throat and casts him into prison. When mercy had been bestowed
upon him he threw his debtor into jail, as the plaintiff in this case has
throw this poor woman in the street. And the conduct of that unworthy
servant at that time rings now through all the aisles of history, and its
138 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
teaching is as strong, its lessons as cogent, as they were eighteen hundred
years ago, when the story was first told ; and that servant met with the
same condemnation from the Great Judge and Searcher of all Hearts, that
the plaintiff in this case, who showed no mercy to this poor, friendless,
widowed woman, will find from the Judge and Searcher of all Hearts
to-day, and from men who have hearts to be moved and pity to be excited
by a story of oppression, outrage, and wrong."
Mr. Storrs was interrupted here by a hearty outburst of
applause, which had to be checked by the court. He then pro
ceeded to say :
"There is another curious spectacle about this case which impresses me
very strongly. It is the curious connection of the plaintiff in the case with
the attorneys of this woman. Rourke and Chase are here as witnesses for
this plaintiff, and they were the attorneys of Mrs. McMurray. How does
Higgins know what that woman had ever told Rourke, unless Rourke told
him ? And what right had Rourke to tell the opposing party the facts
which his own client had communicated to him ? Why, that fact alone,
piled on the top of this pyramid of wrongs, is enough to blacken it for
ever. He is not only determined that the promise made to this woman
shall be broken, but he is also determined that whomsoever she gets to
act for her, and protect her rights, shall betray her interests and abuse the
trust she has reposed in them. (Sensation.)
"And now he claims credit for Mrs. McDonald's charity. As the final
act in this affair, Mrs. McDonald permitted this property to be sold, and
this woman thus got $220. Van H. Higgins claims credit for that. It was
not his property ; he had no right in it ; he had no control over it. It is
like the old definition of charity, — if A sees B in distress, he is very glad
to have C relieve him. He is about as much entitled to the credit as I
would be if I gave my neighbor's coat to the Patagonians, and his boots to
the Hindoos. It is very well in this world, but in the other world it will
be very different. Van H. Higgins will find that the $220, on the eternal
records of human life, are not placed to his credit, but to the credit of
Eva McDonald, to whom it belongs. Nor will he find that his magnificent
offers have been placed to his credit ; he will find, where justice is searched
and probed to the bottom, that they measure men by what they do, and
not by what they say ; that they judge of the tree by its fruit : and that, when
he is setting himself up as a minister of charity, he had better stop in
Jericho until his beard is grown. The miserable gift of two dollars is all
the charity of this man, against all this sickening story of wrong. All this
gulf, all this black page of oppression and wrong perpetrated upon this
widowed, childless woman, is illustrated by no bright spot, relieved by no
kindly act, sustained by no single emotion which would dignify the heart
of man or entitle him to any sympathy at. all, save the single, faint, feeble
ray of light which gleams with fitful radiance from the two dollars which
he gave to this woman through the Union Defence Committee. Give him
credit for these two dollars. I am willing to admit there was no discount
A CELEBRATED LIBEL CASE. 139
on it ; it was in the days before gold went out of circulation ; whether it
was Illinois currency or not, I know not. Give him credit for it. He
promised to give her more, but it is all she ever got except wrong and
cruelty and oppression.
" They tell us he had a right to close this contract ; to take this property by
foreclosure. That is not the question we are trying. The question we are
trying here is whether he did a good and kind act towards this poor
woman, or whether he was unjust, cruel, and oppressive towards her. A
similar case once happened in the city of Venice. It was the case of
Shylock z/. Antonio. Shylock dealt in money. He lent Antonio money on
a bond, the penalty being that, if he did not pay it at a certain time and
place, Shylock should cut a pound of flesh from any place he chose,
nearest his debtor's heart. The day came; Antonio failed to connect; his
ships had gone down to the bottom of the sea ; banks had broken ; real
estate had depreciated ; and he could not pay his debt. The case is
brought into court ; the parties are all present ; the duke speaks to this
plaintiff Shylock, and says, ' Your claim is cruel ; it will be very brutal for
you to enforce it; can't you have some mercy on this man?' But that
old plaintiff tells him, ' No, I will have my pound of flesh ; I will have my
bond.' And then, when his pity is again appealed to, he turns to the
papers as they do in this case, and says. -Is it not nominated in the
bond? I'll have my bond.' So that case went on to trial, as this case
went on to trial. Shylock insisted upon the letter of his bond. There was,
however, a little trip in the pleadings. Shylock did not get the forfeiture.
They had a judge who, while sticking to the law, stuck to the letter of it,
and suggested that he could take a pound of flesh, but if he took one drop
of blood, his life should become forfeit to the state. • Shylock concluded
that he would 'withdraw a juror' in that case, and left the court-room,
which he had entered in confidence of getting his bond. Now it would be
a great deal better for the plaintiff in this case to do the same. The judge
would say to him, 'You can have your pound of flesh, but if you take
one drop of this poor woman's blood, if you violate the sense of right
and justice that is not in the bond, you will forfeit your reputation, and
everything you have, to the public in which you live.' That would have
been the judgment that would have been passed upon this case by that
judge. And, gentlemen of the jury, that is the judgment that will be
passed upon this case by you.
" But they say they are going to take these things down the aisles of
history. They are going down to future generations with them. I say, let
them go. This plaintiff has got a bigger load to toddle down the highway
of history with than ever man had before. He will stagger under the
accumulating weight, and it will grow greater and greater as the long years
stretch out before him. It will stick to him in time to come like the fabled
shirt of Nessus, and will burn, and burn, in memory of the wrong that he
has perpetrated upon this woman. And if he is a man with the ordinary
feelings of our nature, when he goes to his bed at night do you think he
has no troubled dreams? Do not you believe that, grouped around his bed
I4O LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
in those uneasy slumbers which an unquiet conscience makes, there are the
departed spirits of M* Murray and his dead children? Do not you believe
that their fingers are pointed in reproach at him, and he cannot but believe
that each pore of his body is a trumpet which is clamoring his ill-doings
to the world ?
"They say they are going to the Supreme Court. We will follow them
to the Supreme Court, and if he desires in a lawbook, either in calf or
sheepskin, to make a memorial of this record, he is quite at liberty to do
it ; and this tale of wrong will grow all the larger the more it is looked at.
" We have talked of him as a man : we have talked of him as a judge,
bringing this case in his own court. Do you believe this woman could
approach the other associate judges of that court with the same con
fidence that Van H. Higgins could, who sat upon the bench with them day
by day ? Why, there is an impropriety in it which shocks every mind ; and
that noble lawyer and distinguished judge, John M. Wilson, tells you that
he was at once struck with the impropriety of that case being brought in
that court ; he felt a delicacy about trying it. I tell you that the honor of
our judges is a very sensitive thing. Once let the breath of suspicion fasten
upon it, once let it be open to reproach, and the whole fabric of our
jurisprudence tumbles into ruins. It hangs by as delicate a thread as the
snow avalanches in the Alps. The snow hangs in great overhanging masses
over dangerous passes, and the merest concussion of the human voice will
release them from their hold upon the rocks, and send them, the messengers
of death and desolation, to all that is beneath. Sensitive as that is, the
structure of our entire jurisprudence is equally so. It must be spotless and
pure ; there must be no breath of suspicion leveled against it or fastened
upon it. I have looked upon this plaintiff as a judge, as a man, and as a
citizen, and I believe, and I think you believe, that his treatment of this
woman has been unjust, oppressive, and cruel, and that the man who is unjust,
oppressive, inhuman, and cruel, is not fit to sit upon the bench ; that he is
a disgrace to it ; that he sullies and pollutes the judicial ermine which he
wears."
A renewed outburst of applause again prevented Mr. Storrs
from proceeding for several minutes. When the court had
succeeded in restoring order, Mr. Storrs said :
"This is indeed a serious record to make up against any man. The plain
tiff has made it for himself. He demands your verdict upon this wearisome
detail of heartlessness and oppression. Grieved as we may be that a fellow
citizen should thus stain the honor of the high office which he held, or that
in this great city, honored as it has been by its magnificent and far extend
ing charities, any man could be found who would oppress the weak in
their helplessness, and turn the widow and the orphaned children of the
dead soldier beggared and starving into the streets, we cannot refrain from
the solemn duty which has been imposed upon us, of affixing the seal of
condemnation to such offences against our consciences as have been proven
in this case. You must say whether the unjust judge, the avaricious man,
A CELEBRATED LIBEL CASE. 14!
shall be sustained or not. Your verdict to-day may be, as I trust it will,
so distinctly pronounced that it shall be like letters of flaming fire, painted
against the sky, that all the world may read it ; and when avarice, with its
greedy hand, would seize upon the widow's mite or press the unfortunate
debtor to the earth, or when the judge forgets the dignity of his high office,
they may look upon the record and take warning from it."
The parable of the ewe lamb, as we have already seen, was
always an especial favorite of Mr. Storrs. He closed his argu
ment by quoting it in full, as exactly applicable to this case, and
concluded by saying :
"You are not, gentlemen of the jury, the prophets of the Lord, but it is
an old saying that 'the voice of the people is the voice of God.' You
speak for the people ; you represent the people. Take this simple story —
the most beautiful thing in literature — and apply its teachings here. This
plantiff, as did the Israelitish King, spared to take of his own substance to
supply the wants of those who made demands upon him, but he took this
poor woman's home, endeared to her by a thousand associations, hallowed
by a thousand sacred memories, and satisfied his creditors with that !
And even as the finger of the stern old prophet pointed to his royal
listener as guilty of the very crimes which he had but just denounced, so
will the verdict of this jury, reciting the story of the wrongs which this
widowed woman has suffered, declare to this plaintiff, 'Thou art the man.'"
The Times, in its report of the trial, said: — "Mr. Storrs con
cluded his argument at I2^£ o'clock. His remarks, extending
through a period of two hours, had been listened to attentively
and with most marked interest by the entire assemblage, among
whom were many of the most prominent practitioners of the
Chicago bar. It is only a merited and truthful tribute to Mr.
Storrs to say that he delivered a most eloquent, powerful, and
convincing argument."
The plantift's counsel became demoralized, and did not dare
to take the verdict of the jury after Mr. Storrs' speech. The
suit was withdrawn.
CHAPTER X.
JOHNSON'S RECONSTRUCTION POLICY.
MR. STORKS AT OTTAWA, ILLINOIS, 1 866 — JOHNSON'S DOCTRINE THAT THE
REBELS FORFEITED NO POLITICAL RIGHTS AN EXHAUSTIVE REPLY
JOHNSON'S RECORD REVIEWED.
WHEN Andrew Johnson succeeded to the Presidency on
the death of Mr. Lincoln, he immediately inaugurated a
policy in dealing with the rebellious States which soon brought
him into collision with Congress. He proposed to restore them
at once to all the powers they possessed before the rebellion,
the effect of which would have been to place the colored freed-
men once more at the mercy of their former masters. The
Southern people refused to live on terms of political equality
with the colored people, and acts of violence perpetrated by them
upon the freedmen were daily reported. In the Northern States
the feeling called forth by these outrages was intense, and
Johnson's Southern policy was therefore highly exasperating to a
majority of the Northern people. They regarded the rights of
the freedmen as paramount to all questions as to the relations of
the States to the Federal government, and required that guaran
tees for the preservation of those rights should be secured before
the seceding States should be re-admitted to the Union. In this
they were faithfully represented by the majority in both Houses
of Congress. When, therefore, Johnson vetoed such measures as
the Freedman's Bureau bill and the Civil Rights bill, a breach
between him and Congress was inevitable ; and when Johnson
undertook to remove Secretary Stanton in open violation of the
Tenure of Office bill,. his impeachment was resolved upon, with
a result which is now matter of history.
142
JOHNSONS RECONSTRUCTION POLICY. 143
While this conflict between the Executive and the Nation was
at its height, Mr. Storrs reviewed the questions at issue m in a
powerful and closely reasoned speech at Ottawa, Illinois, in Sep
tember 1866, which the Chicago Tribune published in full. It
occupied six columns and a half of the old "blanket" sheet, or
nearly two pages of the present edition of that paper. The
Tribune paid it the compliment of special editorial notice, charac
terizing the speech as " a complete, conclusive, and overwhelming
reply to the harangues of Doolittle, Dickey, Hoffman, Johnson,
and all other Copperhead speakers, on the question of reconstruc
tion and the status of the rebels and rebel States. It is Websterian
in logical reasoning, in purity ©f diction, and in force and clear
ness of statement.'' So highly was the speech regarded that the
Tribune afterwards reprinted that portion of it which, — to use its
own language, — "demolishes the Johnson-Doolittle doctrine that the
conquered rebels have forfeited no political rights, and that States
cannot commit treason ; that the rebels have a constitutional right
to seats in Congress without conditions precedent ; and that the
rebel States were never out of the Union, never committed treason,
and have a continuing, abiding, inalienable, indefeasible right to
an equal voice in the government, regardless of the rebellion and
their attempt to destroy the Union. " All these assumptions," said
the Tribune, "are completely demolished, and the actual status of
the rebels and rebel States so clearly presented, that a wayfaring
man, though a fool, need not err therein."
How amply the Tribune's eulogium was justified will be seen
from a perusal of the speech, which is here given in full.
"FELLOW CITIZENS: The political issues involved in the pending elec
tions are but a continuation of those that have been before us for the
past five years. During all that period of time the Republican party has
urged a vigorous prosecution of war against a rebellion in arms. The
political issues •vvere those which naturally grew out of the war. They
involved questions of policy as to the manner in which it should be conducted
and the purpose for which it should be waged. The continued and triumphant
supremacy of the Republican party was evidence of the resolute will of the peo
ple to suppress rebellion, to crush out treason, to punish traitors, and so thor
oughly to preserve our national integrity as to remove all the causes which
had given rise to the war. We were at war with the rebellion in its
every part. At war as well with the ideas to carry out which rebel
lion was inaugurated, as with the armies which were marshaled for ,ihe
support of those ideas. For the armies of the rebellion were but the
t
144 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
physical expression of the political principles, to sustain which these
armies were organized. Every battle fought by Southern armies, every
shot fired by Southern traitors, was in behalf of the right of secession,
the political power of slavery, and the Calhoun doctrine of State sover
eignty. In contending with Southern armies we contended with these
political principles. When their armies were defeated the principles for
which those armies fought were defeated also. When their armies surrendered
to ours, they surrendered not only the guns with which they fought,
but the principles for which they fought. For if after fighting traitors in
the field and vanquishing them, we fail to vanquish also the treason
for which they fought, the war has been a failure infinitely more igno
minious and disgraceful than it would have been had the Democratic
platform of 1864 been true when it was written. The question now is, as
it then was, Is the war a failure?
" If after the sacrifice of three hundred thousand lives, and an expendi
ture of almost countless millions of money in conquering the military
power of the rebellion, the only result has been to restore at once sub
jugated rebels to a place in our national councils, to a voice in national
legislation without adequate guarantees that the political heresies which gave
life to treason, and inspired its exertion, shall not flame out anew into the
horrors of civil war ; then is the war a failure indeed, then treason meets
with no punishment, and patriotism has no rewards. For refine and reason
upon it as we may, the question of the hour is, shall the fruits of Union
victories be gathered and secured ?
" Whether this can be done by an immediate restoration of yet disloyal
States and communities to a share in national councils, with the full
privilege accorded to them there to urge by legislation what they have
failed to achieve by war, is the practical shape which this question now
assumes. If unrepenant and still disloyal rebel constituencies are to be
privileged in an attempt to repudiate by legislation the payment of our
national debt, or to assume the payment of the rebel debt, or to deny
the freedman any of the privileges of a citizen, or to acquire an increase
of political strength as one of the results of the rebellion which has been
crushed, or to attempt to establish the dangerous doctrine of State sover
eignty, then clearly enough the war has been profitless in results, and
the fruits of Union victures have wasted and withered as they lie strewn
over a hundred battle-plains.
" The military power of the rebellion having been crushed it would seem
naturally enough to follow that all those who had engaged in the rebel
lion, should, so far at least as political privileges were concerned, fall with
the cause which they had espoused.
"The constitution of every State which attempted to secede from the
Union was, so far as its relation with the National Government was con
cerned, abrogated by the act of secession.
" The Constitution of all these States, so far as the same had relation
to the Confederate Government, fell as the consequence of the defeat of
that so-called Government.
JOHNSON'S RECONSTRUCTION POLICY. 145
Thus, at the close of the war, each and every one of those seceding
States was absolutely without a Constitution. The old one was annulled
by their own act. The new one, which placed them in relation with
the Confederacy, was overthrown by the military power of the nation.
Not only were they without Constitutions as States but there was no
power then existing within the territorial limits of either of those States
by which a new Constitution could be created. The people of those
States had, by their treason, forfeited all political rights and privileges.
Hence, there was no organic law, nor any resident power to create it.
How a State can be said to be in the Union, which has neither a Con
stitution nor a people empowered to create one, nor representation in
Congress, nor even the power to convene a Legislature within its own
territorial limits, is one of those curious political problems which I will
leave to the supporters of Andrew Johnson to solve.
This was the condition of affairs when, by the assassination of Abraham
Lincoln, Andrew Johnson became President of the United States. How
ready the South was at that time to submit to any terms which might have
been proposed to them. How confidently they anticipated their own
exclusion from all share in the control of the nation which they had by the
greatest crime in history sought to overthrow. How ready to concede that
every privilege which they enjoyed was through the clemency of the nation
and not possessed as a right. How easy it would have been at that
time to have restored, upon a basis broad and permanent, every
State to its proper relation with the Union of all the States, we all
well remember.
At once Andrew Johnson began the work of reconstruction. He appointed
what he called Provisional Governors of these various States, whom he
authorized to call Conventions for the purpose, among others, of forming
Constitutions for each of the rebellious States. By this act he substantially
declared as his then opinion that neither of those States had either Con
stitution or political head. He then proceeded to declare what classes of
persons might be entitled to vote at the election of delegates to attend
those conventions, thus asserting that there was inherent in the people of
those States no political privileges, that they had lost and forfeited them by
their treason, and that the right of the elective franchise lost and forfeited
by their treason, could only be conferred upon them by, himself, which he
proposed to do, and did do by pardons, amnesties and proclamations.
And here let me pause to notice the point where Andrew Johnson
first invaded the Constitution, in behalf of treason and against loyalty.
The millions of freedmen who had alone been loyal, who had furnished
of their number for the service of the nation hundreds of thousands of
men, were not permitted to participate in the election of delegates to a
Convention called to re-create a State Government under which they
and theirs were to live. This right was denied upon the assumption
that the Government had no power to extend the elective franchise. It
was said that it was in the power of the Government to deny the right,
146 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
but that it could not confer it. How contemptible a quibble this was
and is, is obvious when we remember that no single rebel participated
in those elections, who was not compelled first to obtain the right from
Andrew Johnson. Every rebel in the South had lost the right to vote,
which he had before possessed, by his treason, and when the work of
reconstruction began he was as completely without the right as the negro
had ever been. Andrew Johnson deprived no rebel of his right to vote.
That right was forfeited by the act of the rebel himself. But Andrew
Johnson did confer the right upon the rebel who had lost it by his treason,
and refused to confer it upon the negro who had fairly won it by his loyalty.
And thus it was that in the work of reconstruction the source and
fountain of all power was Andrew Johnson. He found these States
without Governors, and he appointed Governors. He found them without
a constituency entitled to vote, and he straightway created a constituency,
He found them without political power, and he clothed them with it, and
so it was that the strange spectacle was presented of rebels again exer
cising political power. The result of the elections for delegates was such
as might well have been expected. The Conventions were as much
rebel Conventions as those which the fortunes of war had just dissolved.
With the advice and under the direction of Andrew Johnson, Constitu
tions were framed and declared to be the law of the land. These
Constitutions were as much the work of the President, as were the
Governors themselves the creatures of his authority. He dictates to
Governor Perry the necessity of repudiating the rebel debt. He instructs
all his newly created Governors that the Constitutional Amendment
abolishing slavery must be adopted, and he urges Governor Starkey to
extend the elective franchise to people of color.
The Constitutions thus having been framed in accordance with the
dictations of the President, by a Convention elected by a constituency which
he called into being, at elections called by Governors whom he had
appointed, the work of reconstruction under this one-man power proceeded
to the organization of State Governments. Let it be remembered, however,
in this connection, that the Constitutions thus made were not submitted to
the action of the people of the States for whom they were made, save in
the single instance of the State of Tennessee. The several States being
thus re-created, the constituency whom Andrew Johnson called into being,
proceeded to the election of State officers. Members of Congress were also
elected by Andrew Johnson's voters. And United States Senators were also
elected by Legislatures whom Andrew Johnson's voters had elected ; all
this was done while Congress was not in session. The creator of States did
not deem it advisable in the work of reconstruction to call to his assistance
nor to solicit the counsels of the representatives of the people, but upon the
assembling of Congress that body was advised in a wholesale manner of the
work which the President had performed, and was asked at once and
without question or examination to adopt it, and to admit to seats in
National councils the representatives of a people who but a few months
before were defying National authority, and seeking by force of arms to
JOHNSON'S RECONSTRUCTION POLICY. 147
overthrow it. This Congress has thus far refused to do. Any attempt
to obtain a clear idea of what Andrew Johnson calls 'my policy' from
anything that he says, will prove utterly futile. But comparing his acts
with his declarations it will be seen that they are utterly irreconcilable.
"In his first message to Congress he says, in the course of his argument
against the continuance of military rule over the seceded States, that such
policy would have 'implied that the States whose inhabitants may have
taken part in the rebellion had by the act of those inhabitants ceased to
exist. But the true theory is that all pretended acts of secession were
from the beginning null and void. The States cannot commit treason
nor screen the individual citizens who may have commited treason any
more than they can make valid treaties or engage in lawful commerce
with any foreign power. The States attempting to secede, placed them
selves in a condition where their vitality was impaired but not extinguish
ed — their functions suspended but not destroyed.'
"This is but the statement in a somewhat roundabout way of the propo
sition which all the aiders and abettors of treason, and all the wearied and
tired-out Republicans have incessantly asserted, 'That no State has a right
to secede from the Union, and therefore no State has seceded ; and that
therefore, all the States have all the time been and now are in the Union,
and that whoever asserts the contrary, is a disunionist.' That all pre
tended acts of secession were null and void, is to a certain extent true, and
to a certain extent not true. The proposition is, in this particular, much
like the experience of the young physician who, in commencing practice,
adopted as his • policy,' the building up of medical knowledge by actual
observations of the results of particular medicines administered in particu
lar cases. The first case he was called upon to treat was a fever. He
administered Peruvian bark, and the patient recovered. He at once wrote
in his note book, ' Mem. — Peruvian bark cures fever.' His next case was
also one of fever ; he administered the same medicine and the patient
died; so he at once wrote under his original note, 'Sometimes.' Peruv
ian bark cures fever — sometimes.
" In saying that all acts of secession are null and void, we simply say
that no State has a constitutional right to pass an ordinance of secession.
That the State in rebellion did pass ordinances of secession, as a matter of
fact, is indisputable. That those ordinances were, so far as they affected
the rightful authority of the General Government over the States or the
people of those States, null and void, is entirely correct. But that they
were null and void in the sense that the act of passing them in no way
affected or changed the political rights or privileges of those States or
the people within the Government from which they attempted to secede,
is not true ; and to claim that it is, is to insist that the commission of
a crime works no change in the rights and privileges of the criminal.
A forged deed is, so far as it affects the rights of the party whose name
is forged, absolutely null and void, but it would not be regarded as a
very good defence to be made by the forger that the forged deed was
null and void, and that therefore he had not forged a deed. He would
148 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
find that, although he had not succeeded in affecting the rights of the
owner of the property which he had attempted to convey, he had by
the commission of the crime very seriously impaired and affected his own rights.
While, therefore, the ordinance of secession passed by the State of
South Carolina in no way affected or impaired the authority of the Gen
eral Government, it did very seriously impair and affect the rights of the
State of South Carolina within that Government.
"The President also declares that 'the States cannot commit treason, nor
screen the individual citizens who may have committed treason.' The
answer to this is that these States which are now asking re-admission, did
commit treason, and for over four years they did screen individual citizens
who had committed treason. A French savan who had explained and
demonstrated to a practical Englishman a very ingenious, scientific theory,
upon being told that the theory was a fine one but the facts were all
the other way, answered 'so much the worse for the facts, poor things.'
It was proved by arguments of the most indubitable character, argu
ments quite unanswerable, that Richmond could not be taken ; but in
spite of all rules of logic, Richmond was taken, and the mass of people,
troubling themselves but little with the refined subtleties of Copperhead
Johnsonian Mosaic logic, believe to this day that Richmond was in fact
captured and quite cheerfully 'accept the situation.'
"Governor Yates prorogued a disloyal Legislature the members of which
packed their satchels and went home. It was contended, however, that as
the Constitution pointed out the manner in which the General Assembly
should be adjourned, inasmuch as that manner had not been pursued, the
Legislature had not been adjourned but continued all the time in session.
The Supreme Court thought otherwise, and held that although the legal
forms had not been complied with, the members having gone home, there
was an adjournment in fact. I am unable to perceive why a State cannot,
as a matter of fact, commit treason. All acts done by the State Govern
ment are acts done by the State, because in no other way can the State
act. The various ordinances of secession were passed by the State Legisla
tures, and approved by their officers, and were therefore the acts of the
States. Annies were raised to wage war against the United States by the
legislative action of State Governments. This was the act of the State, and
inasmuch as the act was treason, it was treason committed by tJic States.
That these States had no right to pass ordinances of secession, nor to wage
war against the Government, we were quite well aware before being advised
upon that point by Andrew Johnson. The fact that they did do these things,
no swinging around the circle will remove. But that ' the States ' were in
insurrection against the Government is affirmatively declared by the address
adopted by the Johnson Philadelphia Convention. It is there said, ' The with
drawal of their members from Congress by the States which resisted the
Government, was among their acts of insurrection ; was one of the means
and agencies by which they sought to impair the authority and defeat the
action of the Government'
JOHNSON'S RECONSTRUCTION POLICY. 149
"If language has not altogether lost its force and words their significance,
it is, by the portion of the address which I have read, declared, ist. That
the States withdrew their members from Congress. 2d. That these States
resisted the Government. 3d. That these States were guilty of acts of insur
rection against the Government, among which the withdrawal of their
members was one. 4th. That these States sought by various means and
agencies to impair the authority and defeat the action of the Government.
It is quite certain that resistance to the Government, acts of insurrection
against it, and attempts to impair its authority and defeat its action, amount
to treason. All these acts, it is declared by the Philadelphia address, the
seceding States have committed — that is, they have committed treason.
Andrew Johnson declares in his message that a State cannot commit trea
son, while the Siamese address, promulgated by his satraps, and the
reading of which suffused his eyes with tears, declares that they have com
mitted treason. But further, we are told that the States attempting to
secede placed themselves in a condition where their ' vitality was impaired,
but not extinguished ; their functions suspended, but not destroyed.' The
State Governments which passed ordinances of secession not only impaired
their vitality by those acts while within the Union, but they lost it altogether.
When the Legislature of South Carolina declared that State out of the
Union, that body ceased to have any vitality within the Union. It was not
a mere suspension of their legislative functions within the Union, but it was
an absolute destruction of those functions. As I have already observed,
the State Government is the State. What it does, the State does. And if
it be true, that in adopting an ordinance of secession, the State Govern
ment of South Carolina merely suspended its functions within the Union, it
would seem to follow that immediately that the ordinance proved practically
a failure, from lack of power to carry it out, its suspended functions were
at once restored, and nothing but their defeat in battle was necessary to
place them upon a platform of entire equality of political privileges with
the States from which they attempted to secede.
"But Andrew Johnson's acts were entirely inconsistent with his hazy
and impracticable theories. In his work of reconstruction he proceeded
upon the principle of destruction, and not upon the theory of suspension
of political vitality and functions. He appointed Governors. By that act
he said there are no Governors. He gave to the people the right to
vote. By that act he declared that they were without political power —
not that their political power was merely suspended, but that it was
destroyed. He did not merely set in operation the old Governor, the old
State Legislatures, under the old Constitutions, deriving their authority
from their old constituencies, and all acting under their old laws, which
would have been the case had the rebellion produced simply a suspen
sion of their political vitality, but he ignored these altogether — did not
restore an old Government, but created a new one.
" It was a work of re-creation and not a work of restoration. So long
then as Andrew Johnson by his acts declare that there were in all the
seceded States no Governors, no State officers, no Constitutions, no State
I5O LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
Legislatures, no representation in Congress, no State laws, and no people
possessing political privileges, I must be excused for believing that the
political vitality of those States within the Union was extinguished and
their political functions within the Union were destroyed.
" But if it were true that by the rebellion the political functions of
the rebellious States were merely suspended, it becomes important to
inquire how and in what way they could be rightfully resumed. It is a
favorite expression of ' my policy ' men that when the war ceased, war
measures ceased, and that, immediately upon the surrender of the South
ern armies, everything, by some curious political mechanism, sprung back
to the precise position it occupied before the rebellion began. And this
is really what ' my policy ' amounts to. No States, say they, have ever
been out of the Union. They tried to go out, and failed ; and in con
sequence of their failure their rights when in the Union are unimpaired.
This rs the new Gospel according to the new Moses. This is the Con
stitution as it is in Andrew. Accordingly the Constitution is made to
read thus :
'"Whenever any State Government, or combination of State Govern
ments, declare their relations with the Union of these States at an end,
and seek to make that declaration good by war, the*y shall, so long as
they succeed in war, be deprived of all political rights and privileges,
and shall only be entitled to the full enjoyment of political rights and
privileges within the Union which they have attempted to destroy, upon
the defeat and surrender of their armies.
"Treason against the Government of the Union shall work the destruc
tion of all the political privileges of traitors, so long as it shall be suc
cessful, and these rights and privileges can only be achieved by traitors
in the event and in consequence of their defeat.'
" And so it happens that when McClellan was driven back from
Richmond the Southern States lost their rights, and when Lee surren
dered to Grant at Appomatox Court-House they gained them. Rebel
lion loses by success, and wins by failure. So, if they had finally
defeated us, they would have had no Constitutional privileges, but when
we defeat them they recover them all. Their rights are suspended dur
ing the progress of the war, to be lost if they win and to be gained if
they lose.
" But the doctrine of the Johnson party goes even further than this.
By the third resolution of their platform adopted at Philadelphia, it is
declared that 'representation in the Congress of the United States and in
the Electoral College, is a right recognized in the Constitution as abid
ing in every State fundamental in its nature and neither
Congress nor the General Government has any authority or power to
deny this right to any, or withhold its enjoyment under the Constitution,
from the people thereof.'
"The address adopted by the same Convention puts the proposition
still more pointedly. For, in speaking of the insurrectionary acts of the
States, it is there declared that 'neither the right of representation, nor
JOHNSON'S RECONSTRUCTION POLICY. 151
the duty to be represented, was in the least impaired by the fact of
insurrection.' And again, the address says: 'But it is alleged, in
justification of the usurpation which we condemn, that the condition of
the Southern States and people is not such as renders safe their re-ad
mission to a share in the Government of the country ; that they are still
disloyal in sentiment and purpose, and that neither the honor, the credit,
nor the interest of the nation would be safe were they admitted to the
councils of the nation. We reply to this, First, That we have no right
for such reasons to deny to any portion of the States or people any
right conferred upon them by the Constitution of the United States.'
" This is the authoritative exposition of the principles of that party,
whatever its name may be, which opposes itself to the Republican party,
which denounces Congress, which has for its present head Andrew
Johnson, and for its subalterns and lieutenants the Postmasters and
Internal Revenue Officers throughout the country. Is it possible that we
fully appreciate how monstrous the ideas buried in these smooth and
oily phrases are, how utterly destructive and suicidal they would be if
carried into effect ; how complete would be the triumph of treason should
they be adopted ? Even Andrew Johnson himself had not the hardihood,
upon the opening of Congress, to take any such ground. He admitted
that by the rebellion the political vitality of rebel State Governments
had been impaired and their functions suspended ; but the doctrine
enunciated in the resolutions and address which I have read is a plunge
far in advance. It out-Herods Herod. For here it is declared that
representation is a right abiding in every State ; that neither Congress
nor the general Government has the power to deny the right to any State
or to withdraw it from the people thereof ; that it is a right not in the
least impaired by- the fact of treason, and that States and people that
are still disloyal in sentiment and purpose, and whom it would be unsafe
to the honor, the credit, and interest of the nation to adjnit to its
councils, are nevertheless entitled to be admitted to representation in
Congress, and to a share in the control of our national destiny.
" The Congress of the United States which refuses to adopt heresies,
so monstrous and so criminal ; which refuses to surrender back to traitors,
whose hands are yet red with the blood of your sons and kindred, the
victories which they have achieved ; which refuses to blot out the sub
lime record of four years heroic endurance, suffering and achievement,
by an ignominious confession of all that the blood and valor of your
sons have won ; is denounced by a gathering of pardoned rebels, unpar-
doned Copperheads, and apostate Republicans, as guilty of usurpation ;
and the great loyal people who have carried the nation safely through
the flaming perils of a gigantic rebellion, are insultingly denounced by a
brawling recreant, a conceited demagogue, as traitors to the Constitution,
to preserve which they sacrificd three hundred thousand of their sons,
and to vindicate which still further, if need be, will sacrifice three hun
dred thousand more.
" My fellow-citizens : If you believe that during all the time the rebel-
152 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
lion was in progress, the States engaged in it seeking to destroy the
nation by the sword, had also an abiding right to representation in Con
gress, so that they might there also compass its destruction by legisla
tion, you should vote for those canditates who approve ' my policy,' for
that is my policy.
" If you believe that at no time during the war Congress had the
authority to withhold from the people of South Carolina the right of
representation in our National Congress, you must vote for Dickey, for he
stands upon that platform.
" If you believe that the rights of a State, or of the people thereof, are in
no way impaired by treason, you cannot consistently vote for Logan.
" If you believe that States and people disloyal in sentiment and purpose,
and with whom neither the honor, the credit nor interest of the nation
would be safe, are entitled at once to re-admission into the councils of the
nation, and to equal privileges with loyal States and people therein, you
are a member in good standing of the Johnson party, entitled to a Federal
appointment, qualified for a seat in a Conservative Convention, and to
walk arm-in-arm with Governor Orr, Andrew Johnson, Fort Pillow Forrest
or Henry J. Raymond. For such is the faith of the new party as it is
written. Let all those who believe in it subscribe to it.
"It is also important to observe, with reference to the declaration of
principles and the address adopted by the Johnson party at Philadelphia,
that there is running through them both a clear and unmistakable recog
nition of the old Calhoun doctrine of State sovereignty, which is at the
bottom of all our difficulties. The argument in support of this theory
was that the Constitution was made by the States ; ,that the Union was
a compact between States, from which the States might at any time
they saw fit withdraw. The answer was that the Constitution was not
made by the States, but by the people, and that its declared purpose
was to secure between the people a more perfect union.
"By the second of these resolutions it is declared that the war has
preserved the Union with the equal rights, dignity and authority of the
States perfect and unimpaired ; by the third, that representation in Con
gress is a right abiding in every State; and by the sixth, that all the
States of the Union have an equal and indefeasible right in proposing
amendments to the Constitution. This declaration of principles was
intended to harmonize with the arguments of Messrs. Johnson, Stephens
and Raymond. They insist, a portion of the time at least, that the
treason of the last five years has been committed by the people of the
States, and not by the States; and that although the people of those
States may have lost their rights, the rights of the States remain unim
paired. Hence it is that they sometimes insist that they are simply ask
ing the admission of loyal representatives to Congress, although as I have
already shown, their declaration of principles asserts the existence of an
absolute right of representation entirely irrespective of the loyalty or disloy-
aky of the representatives of their constituents.
" But, my fellow-citizens, this right of representation does not, and can-
JOHNSON'S RECONSTRUCTION POLICY. 153
not be made to rest upon the political standing of the representative.
The question is, not whether he, or some other person, should represent
the particular constituency from which he comes, but whether that
constituency has any right to be represented by anybody. Members of
Congress do not represent the State from which they come, but the
people. The Constitution provides that 'the House of Representatives
shall be composed of members chosen every second year by the people
of the several States.' Now, if the people of the seceding States have,
as Andrew Johnson is compelled to admit that they have, been guilty
of treason, and have thereby forfeited all political rights and privileges,
they have no right to elect representatives at all. The question is then,
not whether the particular representative is loyal or disloyal, but whether the
people who elected him are, or are not loyal citizens. Not whether the
particular man was elected by the votes of the people of that particular
district, but whether the people of that district had any right to elect
anybody. If they were disloyal they had not ; that fact being once
ascertained, the question as to whom a people not entitled to elect any
body, elected, ceases to be of any importance. For a loyal representa
tive of a disloyal people would be a farce. He would not be a repre
sentative.
"A people, or a State engaging in a rebellion, certainly lose some
thing if their rebellion is overthrown. It cannot be that at once, upon
defeat, they who have waged war against the Union are entitled to
equality of rights and privileges with those who have fought in its
defence. This was Andrew Johnson's opinion in May, 1865. By his
proclamation appointing Holden Provisional Governor of the State of
North Carolina, he declares that for the purpose of 'enabling the loyal
people of said State to organize a State Government,' he appoints
Holden Provisional Governor, 'whose duty it shall be at the earliest
practicable period to prescribe such rules and regulations as may be neces
sary and proper for convening a convention, composed of delegates to be
chosen by that portion of the people of said State who are loyal to the
United States, and no others.'
" A State Government not then being in existence, he set the machin
ery in motion by which one was to be organized. But it was to be
organized for loyal people and by loyal people.
"The test of the right to political privileges was therefore loyalty.
"Those rights were lost by disloyalty. And they could only be regained
by loyalty. Andrew Johnson did not deprive traitors of their rights.
They lost them by disloyalty. Andrew Johnson did not make them dis
loyal, nor could they be made so by his declaration. It was their acts
which made them so. Neither did Andrew Johnson make traitors loyal.
He could not do so by proclamation nor by pardons. What they have
lost by treason, then can regain only by loyalty. If the people of the seceded
States are not yet loyal, they have not yet regained their political rights ;
and whether they are or are not loyal in sentiment and purpose, is a
matter of fact about which Andrew Johnson knows no more than any
154 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
other man, nor as much as many men, and which cannot be determined
by his saying, as to the fact, yea, or nay.
"The new Moses seems to be laboring under the impression that the
exercise of political privileges and the enjoyment of political rights rests
solely and altogether upon his decision. He says that the people of the
seceded States are all loyal, and that they have organized State Govern
ments, and elected members of Congress who are at once entitled to
admission. I, for one, desire better evidence of a man's loyalty than
Andrew Johnson's endorsement of it. The President cannot change facts
by assertions. He cannot make a treasonable people loyal by declaring
that they are loyal, any more than he can swing around the circle, and by
hammering at the other end make the great loyal North disloyal by drunken
and mendacious charges that they are traitors.
"The fact of the disloyalty of the Southern' States and people was estab
lished by numberless acts of treason committed by both against the Govern
ment. We ask that they furnish us the same kind of proof of their loyalty
that they have given us of their disloyalty. It must be proved by their
acts. There must be not only repentance for their crimes, but they must
•do works meet for repentance.' Repentance is not done by proxy, either
in Divine or human government. An offender against the laws either of
God or man is not permitted to furnish a substitute to do the repenting for
him. That each offender has to do for himself. The people of this coun
try are not satisfied to have the work of repentance for millions of traitors
done by one man, and that man Andy Johnson. He has quite enough
sins of his own to repent for, .without undertaking to repent for the sins
of others.
" When the several so-called States, which were created by Andrew
Johnson, claimed admission into our national councils, the questions of the
loyalty of their people, and the legitimacy of their pretended State organiz
ations, were all to be passed upon as matters of fact. After investigations
extending over the entire rebellious territory, the gathering of facts from
every conceivable quarter and from all sources, the overwhelming weight of
testimony clearly demonstrated that the pretended State organizations were
the work of rebels, from which the truly loyal men of the South had been
in a great measure excluded ; that their people were still thoroughly disloyal
in sentiment and purpose ; that the assumption of the payment of the Con
federate debt, the repudiation, if possible, of the national debt, the practical
re-enslavement of the Freedmen, would be certain to follow from the action
of the States, so soon as they secured their coveted position in Congress.
So believing, Congress has resolutely refused to accede to the demands of
Andrew Johnson, and has, thus far, kept treason out of our National Con
gress.
"The authority of Congress over this whole subject has been repeatedly
asserted by its defamers, and can hardly admit of discussion. Secretary
Seward, in his great speech delivered at Auburn in 1864, declares that after
the war shall have ceased, ' all the moral, economical, and political ques
tions, as well questions affecting slavery as otJiers, which shall then be
JOHNSON'S RECONSTRUCTION POLICY. 155
existing between individuals and States and the Federal Government, whether
they arose before the civil war began, or whether they grew out of it. -will,
by force of the Constitution pass over to the arbitrament of courts of law,
and to the councils of legislation.' And in reply to Governor Marvin, of
Florida, September, 1865, he states, speaking for himself and for the Presi
dent, ' It must, however, be distinctly understood, that the restoration to
which your proclamation refers, will be subject to decision of Ccngress.'
The Constitution provides that ' Each house shall be judge of the election
returns, and qualifications of its own members.' In judging of the elections
is involved the right of inquiring into and ascertaining whether the electors
possessed the right. For if the facts show that the applying member was
elected by men who possessed no political rights or privileges, then, of course
the judgment would be that there had been no election. And because the
Congress of the United States have thus far exercised the authority, which
the Constitution has given it, and it alone, because it has refused to restore
to full share in the councils of the nation unrepentant, and yet defiant
traitors, because it insists that when rebel States and people are restored to
the Union, they shall come back upon terms of equality with loyal States
and people, and not with an increased political power, as the result of their
crimes ; because it does these things, it is denounced as an assumed Con
gress, as a traitorous body, as usurpers.
" Refusing to adopt the hasty and inconsiderate action of the President ;
appreciating the seriousness of the task before them, and the absolute nec
essity of securing by sufficient guarantees the fruits of our victories ; acting
upon the assumption that the loyal people of the country would be satisfied
with no settlement of these questions by legislation which was not as thor
ough and complete an overthrow of treasonable principles in politics as the
defeat of their armies had been in battle, the Congress of the United States,
after months of investigation and discussion, agreed upon a policy, and
presented it to the people.
"The policy of Andrew Johnson and his supporters is the immediate
restoration of Southern States to power irrespective of their present loyalty
or disloyalty, without guarantees for the future, and without punishment for
the past.
" The policy of Congress is to restore Southern people and States to their
original relations with the Union upon their adopting the Constitutional
Amendment agreed upon by Congress.
" Nothing more, nothing less, is required of the South than this.
"This Amendment is: I. That all persons born or naturalized in the
United States, and subject to its jurisdiction, are citizens of the United
States, and of the States wherein they reside ; that no State shall make any
law abridging those privileges, nor deprive any person of life, liberty or
property, without due process of law, nor deny to any person within its
jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. 2. That Representatives shall
be apportioned among the several States according to their respective
numbers ; but when the right to vote is denied to any of the male inhabi
tants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the
156 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion or
other crime, the basis of representation shall be reduced in the proportion
which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number.
3. That no person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, elector
of President and Vice-President, or hold any office civil or military, under
the United States, or under any State, who having previously taken an
oath as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as
a member of any State Legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of
any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have
engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or com
fort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of
each House, remove such disability. 4. Places the validity of the public
debt of the United States beyond question, and deprives the United States
or any State of the right to assume the payment of the Confederate debt.
"That there is nothing in either of these sections unjust to the South or
prejudicial to the interests of the whole country, is obvious. That the negro
is now a freeman no one has the effrontery to deny. Being a freeman, and
born in this country, it would be difficult to tell what he is, if he is not a
citizen. By his devotion to the cause of the Union, through the long years
of the rebellion, he broke the chains which had held him a slave, and fairly
achieved for himself the right to the name of a man and the privileges of
a citizen. The question of citizenship which the South is now ready to
admit should be placed beyond all contingencies in the future. The admis
sion which they are ready to make to-day, as the price of their restoration
to power, we desire that they may be compelled to respect, even* after the
price for which it was made has been paid. The section confers no right
of suffrage, either directly or by implication. It simply declares the equality
of all American citizens before the law ; that the black citizen will be pro
tected in his rights of person and property, as well as the white; that the
rebel planter shall not be permitted to swindle the loyal and laboring negro
out of his wages.
"The negro being then a citizen is entitled to the rights of a citizen. It
would be wrong to permit those rights to be taken away from him, unjust
to deprive him, without due process of law, of life, liberty, or property, or
to deny the equal protection of the laws. It being wrong and unjust to
deprive the negro of his rights, it is both right and just to prevent any
State from committing such wrong and injustice. It is right for us to pre
vent the South from doing what it would be wrong for them to do.
" But the great clamor against Congress is based more particularly upon
the second section of the article. The objection to this section goes very
far to prove that the South do not intend in good faith to accept the results
of the war. If they were at once admitted, as they claim that they should
be, the inequality of power between them and the North, and in their
favor, would be most glaring. Thus, under the present apportionment,
South Carolina, with a vote of 35,000, has four representatives in Congress,
while the free State of California, with a vote of nearly 109,000, has only
three. And not only would there be this glaring inequality as an existing
JOHNSON'S RECONSTRUCTION POLICY. 157
fact, but South Carolina would gain one additional member of Congress as
the result of the war, would secure not only a present inequality of repre
sentation in her favor, but a prospective increase of political power in the
councils of a nation which through four years of war she had sought to
overthrow. Thus is one rebel soldier in South Carolina made equal in
political power to four Union soldiers in California to-day. And in 1870
would be made equal to five. And the loyal States, with nearly three times
as large a vote, have only one hundred and fifty-six representatives, against
eighty-five allowed the Southern States to-day, and which would be increased
by eleven, as a consequence of the rebellion. And this is punishing treason !
The negro is free, not by the generous concession of the South, but liberated
by force of arms ; free because his master, who waged war against his
Government that he might rivet the chains still tighter, was conquered —
subjugated if you will. The relation of master and slave having fallen, it
is but proper that all political power which the master derived from that
relation should cease also. Just so long as white men only are permitted
to vote, none but white men are represented. My idea is, that in such case
the fair rule is, that the number of representatives shall be governed by the
number of people represented. If there are in a State 100,000 male citizens
over twenty-one years of age, only 25,000 of whom vote, it is certain that
75,000 of the whole number go unrepresented. The interests and wishes of
those 75,000 may be entirely adverse to the 25,000- who vote, and I am
utterly opposed to any scheme under which such a state of things should
continue to exist when the necessity for it has passed away. The Republi
can platform of 1864, declares of slavery, that 'justice and the national safety
demand its titter and complete extirpation from the soil of the Republic.'
But it is proposed by the author of that resolution and by the party in
whose employ he now is, and whose addresses, manifestoes and declarations
he writes, that the main structure of the institution may be destroyed, but
that its scaffolding and supports shall still be left to offend the eye and
disfigure the landscape. The work of extirpation is not completed until
every statute which recognized it, every benefit to the master which grew
out of it, every constitutional provision which secured and guarded it, every
political power or privilege which resulted from it, is rooted out with slavery
itself. For all these were but parts of the system, the limbs, the heart of
slavery, and they are all foredoomed to 'extirpation from the soil of the
Republic.' This great crime which, like a poisonous plant, grew, upon the
soil of the Republic, carefully watched and tended by zealous friends, grew
with ominous rapidity, until its far-reaching branches, lengthening day by
day, threw their shadows all over the land ; its roots struck deep and wide
spread into earth ; from these the parent trunk sent forth its supports, and
the odors of its blossomings lulled to sleep the patriotic vigilance of a nation,
and numbed its conscience. The war waged against this gigantic crime by
the Republican party, is not ended until the poisonous thing is utterly and
completely extirpated. So long as a root, or limb, or fibre remains, our
work is incomplete.
"Slavery is not extirpated so long as an atom of the political power which
158 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
resulted from it is suffered to remain. To still leave in the hands of the
master the political power which he wielded as the owner of slaves, after
the slaves themselves are free, is not the extirpation of slavery as I under
stand it. One of the supports of slavery was the power which the Consti
tution enabled the master to wield by counting the slave in the apportion
ment of representation. This was a part of the system which should be
destroyed altogether.
"I am disposed also, in this connection, to look the facts squarely in the
face. I find that in the one State of South Carolina there were, in the year
1860, in round numbers, 700,000 people. I find that of that number,
290,000 were four years engaged in attempting the destruction of this
nation, and were its bitter and deadly enemies. I find that of this
number, 410,000 sought to save this nation, and were its constant
and unswerving friends. I observe that when Andrew Johnson
discourses of the rights of the people of South Carolina, he simply
means the 290,000 enemies, and does not mean its 410,000 friends.
He charges that we are violating, by refusing those 290,000 people
representation in Congress, the fundamental principle that there should
be no taxation without representation, and that we are endeavoring to
force negro suffrage upon the poor, taxed, unrepresented people of South
Carolina. The constitutional amendment places it within the power of
South Carolina to increase its representation in Congress by extending
the. right of suffrage to all its citizens. It leaves the question of negro suf
frage with the States to determine for themselves. But I insist that a
rebel white man shall not be permitted to represent or misrepresent the
loyal and patriotic black man, without giving the latter an opportunity of
making his own choice by whom and how he shall be represented. It is
asking quite enough to let rebels represent rebels, limiting the number of
rebel Representatives to the number of rebels represented, without demand
ing that the number of rebel Representatives shall be increased by adding
to their traitorous constituencies three-fifths of the whole number of a loyal
population who are not allowed to have a voice or vote in the matter.
"Isn't it about time for us, in talking about the rights of the people of
South Carolina, to give some heed to the rights of those who are and
always have been loyal, and particularly so where they are largely in the
majority in point of numbers? Are these 410,000 loyal people of South
Carolina represented anywhere? No. Are they taxed? Yes. Has any
body heard Moses entering any complains about that? Assuredly not.
But it would be sad indeed, if we should force upon 210,000 rebels, malig
nant and unrepentant rebels living in the State of South Carolina, the
necessity of permitting 410,000 loyal people who are citizens of the same
State to a share in the management of its affairs.
"The constitutional amendment nevertheless does not do this. I only
regret that it does not.
"The objection made to the third section of the constitutional amend
ment is that it disqualifies all the intelligent men of the South from taking
part in public affairs, and that their services are now and will hereafter be
JOHNSON'S RECONSTRUCTION POLICY. 159
very much needed. If these intelligent Southern gentlemen had been a
little more intelligent they would not have enlisted in the rebellion. They
were traitors not because they had too much intelligence, but because they
didn't have enough. I would prefer more loyalty, and less of that kind of
intelligence which leads a man into the commission of treason.
" I have since the close of the war heard of only one man possessing that
peculiar kind of Southern intelligence, who thought he had lost anything
by not going with the rebellion, and that man was Andrew Johnson. I
must be pardoned for saying that Andy's colored man Hiram, who sat on
the sofa with him at the Inauguration ball, and who had the good sense to
keep out of the rebellion, and to be glad that he did so, possesses a kind
of intelligence that suits me better than his master's, and that to my mind
will be infinitely more beneficial now and hereafter.
"That the National debt should be paid, and that the rebel debt should
not be, is, I will assume, entirely just and right. If it is right that the
South should bear with us their portion of the National debt, and should not
be permitted to attempt the payment of the rebel debt it is quite right that
they should be compelled to do what is right and prevented from doing
what is wrong.
"But in this connection, Andrew Johnson loudly complains, and the
declaration of his principles echoes the complaint that the seceded States
are not permitted to take part in proposing these amendments. The sixth
section of this declaration of principles asserts that in proposing amend
ments to the Constitution and in ratifying the same ' all the States of the
Union have an equal and undefeasible right to a voice and a vote therein.'
"Now, if this is sound doctrine, curious results would follow. I suppose
that so accomplished a gentleman as the author of this 'declaration of prin
ciples' fully appreciates and understands the words which he employs. 'All
the States of the Union (he says) have an equal and indefeasible right to a
voice and vote' in proposing amendments to the Constitution. According to
Mr. Raymond's theory Virginia has never at any time ceased being a State
of the Union. This right to a voice and vote in proposing amendments to
the Constitution is, he says, indefeasible, that is to say, this right cannot
be defeated', it has always existed, existed as well during the progress of the
rebellion as before its commencement. So that at any time during the war,
while the capital of the country was threatened by troops raised by the
State of Virginia, which had withdrawn its representatives from Congress,
and allied itself to an independent and a hostile Government, that State
had still the right to propose amendments to a Constitution whose authority
it denied and resisted, and to obey which when amended it would refuse.
"The indefeasible right to propose the terms of a contract, to which the
proposer refuses to be a party, the obligation of which he denies, and to
abide by and obey which he absolutely refuses, is a startling political dis
covery, which becomes still more remarkable, when added to the right to
propose the terms, an indefeasible right also exists under all these circum
stances to decide whether they shall be adopted.
"If this right is indefeasible, it exists at all times and under all circum-
I6O LIFE OF EMERY A. STORRS.
stances. If, therefore, an amendment, in proposing which Virginia and the
other seceded States have been deprived of a voice and vote, has been
proposed and1 adopted, their right has been violated, and they would not be
bound by any such amendment.
"These are the legitimate results of this doctrine. If it is sound, there
never was a government so utterly helpless, so completely at the mercy of
its enemies, as our own.
" And this proposition, as well as all the others of that party, is backed
by the cry. 'The States have not been out of the Union.' A State cannot
secede, in the same sense that a man cannot steal. It cannot legally, t
although it may in fact secede, and a man cannot legally, but the records
of our courts show that many men do in fact steal. And so a State like
Virginia is in the Union, in the same sense that the convicted thief is in
Illinois. He is in Illinois, but he is also in the penitentiary. While there
he has his rights, but they are the rights of a thief and not of a law-abiding
citizen, and so Virginia, a rebel State, has its rights, but they are the rights
of a rebel State, and not of a loyal one. The thief must serve his time out
' before he can be restored to his proper practical relations ' with the people
whose laws he has offended, and so must Virginia. The thief so long as he
sees no chance for a pardon, or for an escape, ' accepts the situation ' for
the most excellent of reasons, he can't help it. Virginia accepts the situa
tion for the same reason. But because the thief gave up the stolen pro
perty, when the officers of the law by force took it away from him, he does
not thereby escape punishment for the crime, although, in the language of
Andrew Johnson, the larceny was utterly 'null and void,' any more than
Virginia does when she surrenders the forts and arms that she has stolen,
because she was compelled by force to do so. Nor when the thief is
brought to trial is he permitted to have a voice or a vote in proposing what
his punishment shall be, nor in 'ratifying the same.' Nor will Virginia,
while she is on trial at the bar of the country, be permitted to say upon
what condition her guilt shall be washed away, and what securities shall be
demanded for the future.
"If however, when Andrew Johnson was occupying the bench, a thief
should be brought to trial before him, he would insist that it was a clear
case of taxation without representation ; that the criminal was taxed to pay
the expenses of the jury while he was not represented upon it, and that
therefore twelve thieves should at once sit with the twelve honest men in
proposing measures of punishment and security, and thus taxation and
representation would go hand in hand ; there would be harmony and fra
ternal feeling ; thirty-six stars on the flag, a copy of the Constitution at
every railroad crossing, and a magic circle in every family.
"The constitutional right to amend the Constitution of the United States
in the manner pointed out by the Constitution, I will take it for granted,
exists, and that the nation can secure peace for the future in no other
way is obvious. The object of Congress has been and the will of the peo-
ble is that all questions growing out of the rebellion shall be settled
permanently and forever. While it is not to be expected that the Southern
JOHNSON'S RECONSTRUCTION POLICY. 161
people are to be at once brought back to a genuine affection for the Union
of these States, a love for the Government or a pride in its institutions;
while it is quite probable that the recollection of the disastrous defeac
which they have suffered, will rankle in their hearts for some time to
come, yet it is possible to place it beyond their power, by legislation or
otherwise, ever again seriously to imperil the security of our institutions.
There is one way by which this result can be achived, and but one way,
viz: that adopted by Congress, the Amendment of the Constitution of the
United States.
" Nor do the requirements which Congress makes of the rebellious States
as a people, as the conditions upon which they shall be admitted to the
position in the nation which they voluntarily abandoned, spring from any
feelings of passion or hatred against either those States or their people.
They are merely wise, prudent and essentially necessary precautions for the
future peace and well being of the nation, theirs as well as
ours. Fraternal feeling, about which our sobbing President has so much to
say, is a good thing. It would be well if North and South were harmon
iously united, but it is asking rather too much of human credulity that we
should believe that a people who for over four years have waged a
most causeless and malignant war against the nation, a war persisted in
to the last moment, characterized by a hatred absolutely ferocious, and
before and during which every proposition looking to peac^ on the basis of
a restored Union, was defiantly spurned and spit upon, have suddenly, and the
moment their armies were beaten, become devoted friends to the Union,
into whose hands its honor and its interests might safely be placed. Wolves
do not thus suddenly become lambs, and the prudent shepherd would cer
tainly, before permitting the captured wolf to pasture with his flocks, require
something more satisfactory than the assurance of the brute, that he
acknowledged his defeat, cheerfully accepted the situation, and had lost all
his former taste for mutton. He would insist that his claws be cut, his
teeth be extracted, his mouth muzzled, and his ability to commit mischief
thoroughly destroyed, although his disposition to do it might not be.
"Now, I ask in all candor, what evidences have the Southern people
given us of their loyalty, of their love of the nation, or pride in its strength
and greatness? They have laid down their arms, we are told. True, but
why did they ? The answer is obvious, not because they desired to, but
because they were compelled to. Not that they hated the Union, and loved
the Confederacy less, but because they hated death and loved life more.
"They acknowledge their defeat. True again. But the surrender of
their armies and their cities proved that fact sufficiently to render it quite
unnecessary that it should be corroborated by their admission, and yet their
historian Pollard does not hesitate to say that there is still in the Southern
heart the 'deathless, dangerous secret that they are the better men,' and
that under different circumstances the cause which they now have lost, they
may yet be able to win. ' They yield ready obedience to the Federal
laws.' Assume that this is true ; it proves nothing, except that the nation
II
1 62 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
is stronger" than they. But the overwhelming weight of testimony is that
they do not yield that ready and cheerful obedience to the laws of the
Union which we have a right to demand. The fact is clearly established
that it is possible to execute the provisions of the Freedman's Bureau and
the Civil Rights bill only with the assistance of the army, and it is the
almost unanimous opinion of army officers, including General Grant, that it
is as yet entirely unsafe to withdraw the military from the Southern States.
"Not only is there this difficulty of enforcing such laws as happens to
be distasteful to rebels, but their local courts do not afford to the Union
men in their localities fair and impartial trials. The answer of General
Sheridan to the President's inquiry whether the courts of New Orleans were
not quite competent to administer justice there, indicates the general condition
of the judiciary South. The answer was a most decided and unqualified
negative.
" The vast volume of testimony taken by the Reconstruction Committee
establishes beyond question the fact that the Southern people are still dis
loyal in sentiment and purpose ; that they still entertain a deadly hatred
towards the Government, and cherish and act upon the belief that they
may yet, by some fortuitous political combinations, regain all the power for
which they have waged four years of unrelenting war.
" That they are still true to the idea of secession is shown by the fact
that their officers' are selected, whenever they have the selection of them,
from men notoriously identified with the secession movement, and, in most
instances, from those who have fought in its armies ; and that nowhere in
the rebellious States would a Union man, one who had been known as such
during the war, stand the slightest chance for an election to any office,
against a secessionist.
"Not only are these things well known, but the fact that the unprece
dented magnanimity with which they have been treated, so far from devel
oping Union sentiment, has had directly the opposite effect, is as clearly
established as any fact well can be.
"But we are assured that sufficient evidences of their loyalty are to be
found in the facts that they have abolished their ordinances of secession,
ratified the Constitutional Amendment abolishing slavery, and repudiated
the Confederate debt. You do not need again to be told that none of these
acts were voluntary, but that they were dictated by Andrew Johnson ; that
all these acts were adopted by them because they felt that they were com
pelled to do so; because, indeed, Andrew Johnson and Wm. H. Seward
assured them that they must do so. It is well and wise for us to pause
and to inquire, what do these evidences of loyalty, clearly the resort of pres
sure, amount to? What are they worth? How long would they continue
in existence after the pressure is removed? Once admit these rebel States
to Congress without further guarantees than we now possess for their good
behavior, and all the evidences of loyalty gotten up to order which their
last Legislatures created, would be undone at the next.
"Already Southern Judges are deciding that the work of the Constitu-
JOHNSON'S RECONSTRUCTION POLICY. 163
tional Conventions organized and called into being by Andrew Johnson, is
utterly illegal and invalid. What the Legislature of a State does to-day, it
may undo to-morrow, and as matters now stand, every right which the
freedman is now entitled to enjoy, either by virtue of provisions made in
their new State Constitutions, or by the acts of the Legislatures organized
under them, may be taken from him by the decision of the courts that the
Conventions, by which the Constitutions were made, were illegal and
unauthorized, and that the Constitutions had never been submitted to the
decision of the people ; or by their repeal by future legislation.
" Slavery, we are told, is abolished, and the negro is free. But until the
seed is so thoroughly destroyed that it may never again grow into life and
be re-established, until the negro is not only free, but the enjoyment of
that freedom is secured to him against all invasion in the future, slavery
is not abolished, nor is the negro free, in the full measure which the
nation requires.
" Like the fabled monster Briareus, slavery has an hundred arms, and
like Proteus, may assume almost innumerable forms. With every hand it
works mischief, and in every form that it assumes it is dangerous. Every
law which deprives the negro of the enjoyment of any of the rights of a
citizen, or interferes with him in the enjoyment of any one of those rights,
is the handiwork of slavery, is one of the forms which it assumes.
"Until the negro is free, not only in the ownership of himself, -but free
to work for whom he pleases, free to have a voice in the making of
his own contracts, free in the enjoyment of the proceeds of his own
labor, free to invoke all the agencies of the law for the redress of his
wrongs or the defence or enforcement of his rights, free to educate himself
and his children, free to think as he pleases and to speak what he thinks,
free as you and I are free, and certain that no power shall deprive him
of it, the magnificent promise, made in our platform in 1864, that slavery
should be extirpated from the soil of the Republic, remains unfulfilled.
"If we fall short in either of these things, and while we have relieved the
slave from one form of .bondage, suffer his old master to reduce him to
another, we are false to our high pledges. The slave and all the world
may then well say of us —
'And be these juggling fiends no more believ'd
That palter with us in a double sense ;
That keep the word of promise to our ear
And break it to our hope.'
"Slavery is not yet abolished. The negro is not yet free. For, if
to-day we adopt the policy of Andrew Johnson, to-morrow every rebellious
State has it within its power to annul all its previous action, and by such
hampering legislation as their ingenuity would readily devise, reduce the
negro to a condition of slavery in fact, whatever it might be in name.
"The same power which by legislation they might unless prohibited,
exercise over the subject of slavery, they might also exercise as to the
164 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
assumption of the rebel debt and the repudiation of the national debt. That
the rebel debt has been repudiated, and slavery has been declared abol
ished, in Mr. Raymond's declaration of principles, is not .such a guaran
tee as the people demand. No platform, no set of resolutions, was ever
suffered to long remain an obstruction in the path which led to the
interests of slavery. The violated pledges of half a century warn us to
put but little faith in promises in the future. ' Confidence is a plant of
slow growth,' and it does not flourish well in a soil in which slumber
to-day three hundred thousand of our bravest and our best, slaughtered
to save the nation from the perfidy of those whose fresh promises it is
now demanded we should unquestioningly accept.
" I fail to see why it is that if the rebellious States really and in
good faith intend to accept the result of the war, and abide by the
decision it has rendered ; if they in good faith intend that slavery shall
be abolished ; that the rights of the freedman as a citizen shall be
guaranteed and secured to him ; that their political power shall not be
greater than that of the loyal States ; that the rebel debt shall be fore-
ever repudiated, and that our National debt shall ever be held inviolate,
they should hesitate for one moment in exhibiting their faith by their
works, in making such record of it that they may never be able, and
so never be tempted to violate it, by incorporating the record in the Con
stitution of the United States.
"In no other way can the nation protect itself; in no other way can it
make powerless for mischief in the future those who would have compassed
its destruction.
"Honor and justice alike demand that thus much should be done, and
it will be done.
"The President of the United States has, by the course which he has
pursued, so thoroughly identified himself with the interests of that treason
which we have defeated in the field, and which it is our duty to render
powerless everywhere, that any discussion of these great questions would be
incomplete, which did not include an examination of Andrew Johnson's
record.
" To the examination of this record, he swaggeringly invites the people,
and of it, challenges criticism. It would very much abbreviate our labors,
if when being invited to an examination of 'my record' in conjunction
with 'my policy,' the humble Accident would designate 'which record \i&
alludes to. For leaving out of view his record as a cunning artificer of
men's garments, garments which we are bound to presume, and I am
willing to admit, were 'fearfully and wonderfully made,' and also his
record as Alderman of Greenfield, where he first exhibited his love of
freedom, by insisting upon the right of selling liquor without the tyranni
cal imposition of a license tax, he has three distinct political records.
I. When, as a pro-slavery Democrat, he denounced and opposed Douglas
and supported James Buchanan.
"2. A paroxysm of loyalty and sense, lasting four years, during which time
he was Military Governor of Tennessee, insisted that treason was a crime
JOHNSON'S RECONSTRUCTION POLICY. 165
and should be made odious; that traitors should take back seats, and that
loyal men only, be they black or white, should participate in the work of
reconstruction, and
"3. The return to his first love — manifested by a besotted and disgrace
ful harangue upon the occasion of his inauguration as Vice President ; his
stolid silence on the occasion of Lincoln's assassination ; his precipitate haste
in the work of reconstruction ; his wild and incoherent sreech on the 22d
of February ; his violation of all his past pledges and promises ; his insulting
defiance of Congress ; his organization of a new party for the avowed pur
pose of destroying the one by which he was elected ; his encouraging the
murder of Union men at New Orleans, and his final swinging around the
circle, hammering and getting hammered at this end of the line; the recep
tion of the news from Maine, and threats to break up the next Congress.
" I shall confine whatever I have to say of Andrew Johnson's record to
an examination of the last one, that being the one in which we are more
immediately interested, and this can only be fully appreciated by possessing
something of an understanding of the character of the man who made it.
" The record and its author are in perfect harmony. The man is no baser
than the record, nor is the record baser than the man. The balance of
villainy between the two is perfectly maintained. They sink, each, to the
same depth of baseness ; they rise, each, to the same bad eminence of
scoundrelism, and taken together they are paragons of infamy. When we
know the man,, we cease to wonder at his record, and after we have fully
appreciated the record, we are not surprised at its maker. Arm in arm,
like the touching entree of a small man from Massachusetts with a big one
from South Carolina into the Convention at Philadelphia, have Andrew
Johnson and his record exhibited themselves to the country.
" It will be well for us to note primarily the surface peculiarities. A
moment's inspection discloses an intense egotism and an unbounded vanity.
' I, my, me, us, our, we,' protrude with an offensive prominence, like warts,
from the body of the record, and break out like a rash all over the speeches
of the man. At one time he claims to be the Moses of the African ; at
another the Tribune of the people ; at another the possessor of intellectual
qualities like those of Andrew Jackson ; at another a personal resemblance
to Stephen A'. Douglas ; and at another that he is the representative of the
people and the savior of his country. The imperfections of his temper are
as striking as his egotism. Irascible, self-willed, impatient of contradiction,
he counts every difference of opinion as an insult personal to himself, which
he resents in the slang of a fish-woman, or in the brutal threats of a slave-
driver. Thus he advises Governor Sharkey, of Mississippi, to extend the
right of suffrage to colored people of that State, not as an act of justice to
them, but in order to spite and foil the radicals, whom in the next
breath he denounces as disunionists, for asking precisely the same thing,
but with a higher and better motive. In a public speech, and on a
public -occasion he denounces one of his opponents by name as a dead
duck, and others, by name, as traitors. He threatens to hang indi
viduals whose offence is that they have opposed his measures, and to
1 66 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORRS.
' kick out ' a Congress which he 'could not bully nor bring to his sup
port. He denounces an intelligent and enlightened free press, because
of its discussion of public measures, as a subsidized, a hireling and a
mercenary press. Upon being informed that certain Union men at New
Orleans had denounced him, he wreaks his vengence upon them at once
by directing the military power of the Government to assist in the sup
pression of a Convention to which they were delegates, and which is
done by a massacre unparalleled in its atrocity ; he seizes the occasion
of a journey to participate in a solemn ceremonial, to insultingly denounce
the great party of the Union as traitors, to vauntingly boast of his
absence of dignity, and to engage in blackguard retorts with the crowd
whom he was addressing. Enraged at a remark, that the assassination
of Lincoln was unfortunate, he shamelessly retorts that the murder of
Lincoln was God's justice. And upon an allusion to Judas, foaming with
venom, he likens himself to the Saviour of mankind, and threatens to
veto every measure that Congress sends to him. Upon any exhibition
of the disapproval of his listeners, his fury becomes uncontrollable, and
he impudently boasts that no power on earth, nor this side of hell,
shall drive him from his position, and threatens internecine war.
".But he is as false and as treacherous as he is egotistical and ill-tem
pered. He promised to be the Moses of the negro. He has, in fulfilment
of that promise, sought to deliver him into the hands of his old master.
He said that treason should be made odious. He has succeeded in making
it so only by the influence of his example. He promised that traitors
should be made to take back seats, and in fulfilment of that promise,
Monroe is Mayor of New Orleans, while Dostie is in his grave, Voor-
hees is Lieutenant Governor of Louisiana, while the body of the mur
dered Horton is not yet cold. Orr is Governor of South Carolina, while
419,000 loyal people in that State are deprived of political privileges.
He declared that treason was a crime and should be punished, while
hardly a loyal man fills an office in the South, and the punishment of
rebels is by taking them into his confidence. He declared that they should
be impoverished, and fulfils the promise by placing it within the power of
unrepentant rebels to persecute Union men and drive them from their
midst. He declared that treason was a crime, and should be so treated,
and proves the sincerity of his professions by aiding with his sympathy, and
with his power as Commander-in-Chief of the Army, the traitors and con
victed murderers of New Orleans, in the cold-blooded slaughter of faithful
and long tried Union men, while in convention peaceably assembled. He
declared that in the work of reconstruction none but loyal men should
participate, while in the reorganization of these State Governments loyal
men have no share, and in the administration of their affairs are permitted
to take no part. Elevated to power by the Republican party, he spurns
the counsels of its leaders, and defiantly seeks to defeat the measures
adopted by the representatives of that party and of the people. Not satis
fied with this, he seeks its overthrow by the organization of a new party
in the country, which derives all its strength from rebels at the South and
JOHNSON'S RECONSTRUCTION POLICY. 167
Copperheads at the North, and which he assays to build up by the distri
bution of official patronage, by removing from office, without cause, tried
and trusted Union men, and putting in their places pliant tools of his own,
or those who have always been bitterly hostile to the party by whom he
was elected and to the principles which it has always espoused.
"He has deserted all his old friends, who were the friends of the Union
and the country, for new ones who have always been the enemies of
both.
" Defiant rebels of the South, who during the war perpetuated unparal
leled atrocities in the starvation and slaughter of helpless Union soldiers,
prisoners of war, are by him recognized and declared to be the only
Union men of the South, while those who have been, through the long
four years of the rebellion, hunted and scourged for their loyalty to
their country and its institutions, are denounced as traitors and threatened
with the halter. The hero of the barbarities of Fort Pillow, and his
associates, to whose names still cling the ghostly horrors of Anderson-
ville and Libby, are now the friends of Andrew Johnson and his policy,
while Hamilton and Durant, and Speed, and their associates who were
faithful when all others were faithless, are denounced as sneaks and disorgan-
izers. He professes to be the friend of the people, yet the loyal people of
the South, black and white, know him to be their betrayer. He boasts of
his humble origin and claims to be the especial champion of the poor against
the rich, and proves it by obsequiously prostrating himself before the
moneyed aristocracy of New York City, and, at a twenty-five thousand dol
lar banquet pledging to them his support.
"He is as malicious as he is faithless.
" The malice in his heart is shown when he calls for the hanging of
those in whom the people trust ; when he declares that Congress is an
assumed Congress, and intimates his intention of putting it out by force ;
when he speaks of the freedmen as the assumed freedmen, indicating
clearly that he is prepared to contest their right to their freedom ; that in
his opinion it does not exist either in law or fact ; that it is merely assumed.
" But his egotism, his vanity, his temper, his faithlessness, his malice,
are all overwhelmed by the commission of a greater crime. I mean the
massacre at New Orleans.
"On the 2yth day of July, Andrew Johnson was advised by Voorhees, the
rebel Lieutenant-Governor of the State of Louisiana, that the old Constitu
tional Convention was about to meet in New Orleans. To this dispatch no
attention was paid. It was followed by one on the 28th of the same month
in which the President is told 'You are bitterly denounced;' the names of
the speakers, including Field, Dostie and Hawkins, are given, and he is
advised that it is contemplated to have the ' members of the Convention
arrested under process from the criminal court in that district,' and the sig
nificant inquiry is made : ' Is the military to interfere with the process of
the court ? ' For a proper understanding of the facts it is well here to state
that previously to the sending of this last despatch, General Baird, who,
in the absence of Major-General Sheridan from New Orleans, had command
1 68 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORRS.
of the military there, had been consulted with, both by the rebel Mayor
and the rebel Lieutenant-Governor, by both of whom he had been advised
of the intention to suppress the Convention by the police, and between
whom it was agreed that no such action should be taken. General Baird,
conceiving that there was no danger of any disturbance unless it was brought
about by the rebel city authorities themselves, plainly told the traitor Mayor
and Lieutenant-Governor that he should not permit them to break up the
Convention, by arresting the delegates, without instructions from the Presi
dent to that effect, and so telegraphed the Secretary of War. So that at
the time Voorhees sent his dispatch to Johnson, he had agreed that no
attempt should be made to interfere with the proceedings of the Convention —
had been distinctly advised that the military would not permit it to be done,
particularly in the absence of instructions to the contrary, and knew, too,
that General Baird had so advised Mr. Stanton. The dispatch of General
Baird remained unanswered. The first dispatch of Voorhees to the Presi
dent had remained unanswered, but the second one stirred the blood of
the apostate, and, learning from an ingrained and out-and-out rebel, that
a few of the Union men at New Orleans had denounced him, he rushes
with brutal and criminal haste to the assistance of the rebels of New
Orleans, and not only entirely overrules the action of a loyal officer, who
had said to treason, 'you shall not interfere with loyalty,' but does more
than he is asked to do, and in a dispatch to Voorhees tells him that ' the
military will be expected to sustain and not to obstruct or interfere with
the proceedings of the court.'
" Let us pause long enough to realize the savage infamy of this order.
The rebel civil authorities outnumbering ten, nay, an hundred to one-, the
delegates to that Convention, composed of a traitor mayor, a traitor judge,
and a traitor police, upon which convicted murderers had been placed,
desired nothing in the way of suppressing the Convention of loyal men, but
to be let alone. They feared, and justly feared, the interference of the
military against them. All they asked was that it should remain neutral ;
they had not reached that hardihood of impudence to expect that it would
assist them. Observe that all that Voorhees asks of his master, is to know
whether the military is to interfere with the process of the court? But the
answer which he receives shows that Andy Johnson, in the interests of
treason, is prepared to go farther than traitors care to ask. The military
are directed, not only to interfere, but to sustain these rebel authorities in
their work. Thus the soldiers of the Union, to whom Mayor Monroe had,
but a few months before, surrendered the city of New Orleans, were directed
not only to stand idly by and see this same defiant rebel, still by the grace
of Andrew Johnson, Mayor of that city, aided by the same treasonable
gang who had bitterly fought them through the entire war, in cold blood,
causelessly murder the only men in that whole rebel State who had prayed
for the coming of these Union soldiers, and who cheered them when they
came ; but they were commanded by this recreant President to aid, assist
and sustain them in their murderous work.
"The long-tried, suffering, faithful friends of the Union, and of the sol-
JOHNSON'S RECONSTRUCTION POLICY. 169
dier and the soldier's cause, were not even afforded protection by those
soldiers from rebel violence and outrage, but the soldier was told he must
assist his old and his present enemies in the slaughter of his old and present
friends. Feeling thus assured of the active sympathy 'of the President, the
plan of suppressing the Convention by the arrest of its members, which
Monroe and Voorhees had both agreed with General Baird should be drop
ped, was revived, and after deceiving the latter as to the time when the
Convention was to meet, so that the military, in whom notwithstanding the
order of the President these arch-traitors had but little confidence, should
not be present, they proceeded at once to put it into execution. The man
ner in which that Convention was suppressed, with all its sickening details
of murder and outrage has passed into history and will take its place along
side the horrors of the Fort Pillow massacre. While the slaughter of unof
fending Union men was going on, Andrew Johnson telegraphs to the Attor
ney-General at New Orleans to call on General Sheridan or the officer in
command for a sufficient force to sustain the civil authority. The civil
authorities were sustained, but, thank God, it was not through any assistance
rendered them by the soldiers of the Union. Long before the military could
reach the scene of the massacre, the work was finished. The civil authori
ties needed no assistance. Spurred on, encouraged, directed and sustained in
their bloody work by Andrew Johnson, their work ceased when the mem
bers of the Convention and their friends lay weltering in their blood.
" Dostie, and Field, and Hawkins, had paid the penalty of denouncing
the recreant President with their lives. The friends of Andrew Johnson,
gathering in hundreds around the building where the Convention was
peaceably in session, opened, as we are told by General Sheridan, an
indiscriminate fire on the building through the windows. The bearer of a
white flag from the Convention was shot to death while carrying this
signal of peace to the infuriated supporters of 'my policy.' White flags
were then displayed from the windows ; the firing ceased, but only to
enable the ' civil authorities to make their deadly work the more certain.
The police at once rushed into the building, and without a word of warning
fired indiscriminately upon the audience. Retiring for fresh supplies of
ammunition, they returned to their hellish work, and as the members of
the Convention and their friends succeeded in making their escape, the
policemen,' says General Sheridan, 'who formed a circle nearest the build
ing, fired upon them, and they were again fired upon by the citizens that
formed the outer circle. Many of these were wounded and taken prisoners,
and those not wounded were fired upon by their captors and citizens. The
wounded were stabbed while lying on the ground, and their heads beaten
with brickbats. In the yard of the building, whither some of the colored
men had escaped and partially secreted themselves, they were fired upon
and killed or wounded by policemen. Some men were killed and wounded
several squares from the scene. Members of the Convention were wounded
by the policemen while in their hands as prisoners; some of them mortally.'
"This my fellow citizens, is the simple story of this great crime. It is
the blackest page in our history. The men thus savagely murdered, it
I/O LIFE OF EMERY A STORKS.
behooves us to remember, were our friends, and the friends of our common
country. It was because they were our friends, and our country's friends
that they were murdered.
"If the people of this country suffer this atrocious crime to go unpunish
ed, they do not deserve to have a country.
" If the nation tamely submits to see its truest and its best friends slaugh
tered in cold blood by its most deadly and malignant enemies ; if it does
not visit the full measure of its wrath upon the instigators and perpetrators
of this crime, it does not deserve to exist as a nation.
"I have said that the egotism, the vanity, the malignity, the faithlessness
of Andrew Johnson were all overshadowed by a crime greater than them
all. For of all the guilty ones engaged in that work of massacre, Andrew
Johnson was the guiltiest of them all. For before he had sanctioned it, the
rebel Mayor and Lieutenant-Governor had abandoned their idea of suppress
ing that Convention.
" Andrew Johnson it was that advised it, that directed it to be done, that
directed the military to assist in the work. If there had been no effort of
that kind made, no blood would have been shed. It was by his order thai
it was made. He could have prevented the commission of the brutal sav
ageries of the police force in New Orleans, as General Baird had proposed
to do, and would have done, had he not been otherwise directed by the
President.
"Every shot fired, every blow struck at the loyal victims of that day,
was done because Andrew Johnson sanctioned and directed it, and it would
not have been done without. He says to the Mayor of New Orleans and
to every red-handed murderer whom that Mayor had placed on his police
force, ' Go on with your work. You need fear no interference from the mili
tary. They will not obstruct, they shall assist you.' And thus encouraged,
thus directed, they did go on with their work. The guilt of Andrew John
son is not the guilt of an accessory ; it is the guilt of a principal, under
whose direction, and at whose instigation these murders were committed.
It was for the advancement of his policy that the streets of New Orleans
that day ran red with the blood of murdered Union men. And the savage
tools who that day executed his will are the men into whose hands he has
confided the interests of Louisiana, and under whose control he demands
that that State shall at once take its place within the Union, and share in
the control of its destinies.
" But the guilt of this great criminal is only yet half told. On the first
day of August General Sheridan, who had but just returned to New Orleans,
telegraphed to General Grant his version of the affair in which he declared
that the Convention was suppressed in a manner so unnecessary and atro
cious as to compel him to say that it was murder; that about forty whites
and blacks were thus killed, and about one hundred and sixty wounded.
"The next step in this career of crime was to destroy the evidences of
its existence, and accordingly Andrew Johnson mutilates this dispatch, sup
presses all that portion to which I have referred, and publishes the remaind
er. But the proofs begin to thicken, and as the facts develop themselves
JOHNSON'S RECONSTRUCTION POLICY. 171
more fully to General Sheridan, the magnitude of the crime increases, and
on the 3d day of August he again telegraphs to General Grant: 'The more
information I obtain of the affair in this city, the more revolting it^becomes.
It was not a riot. It was an absolute massacre by the police, which was
not exceeded in its murderous cruelty by that of Fort Pillow. It was a
murder, which the Mayor and police of the city perpetrated without a shad
ow of necessity. Furthermore, I believe it was premeditated and prearranged.'
It was impossible to garble this despatch. Its every sentence was the sure
conviction of Andrew Johnson. But one course remained, and that was its
suppression altogether, and in the meantime that General Sheridan should
be unmistakably advised of the kind of information that he was expected
to furnish. Andrew Johnson felt that for the murders at New Orleans he
was on trial before the country. He knew how important a witness General
Sheridan was. The despatches of the first and third of August showed him
very clearly what the testimony of General Sheridan would be. He knew,
too, full well, that if it went before the people, a great jury whom Presi
dents can neither bully nor bribe, conviction was inevitable, And so like
many a criminal before him he endeavored to suborn, tamper with, and
coerce the witness. Withholding from the public the despatch of August
3d, he, on the 4th day of August, for the first time, telegraphs General
Sheridan, and he begins a series of leading questions, showing clearly by
the manner in which they were framed, how he desired them to be answered
and demonstrating clearly enough that the purpose for which these questions
were put, was not for eliciting the truth, but to a favor certain hypothesis,
regardless of the truth, to make evidence, and not to ascertain facts, with a
statement of his case. He says :
'"We have been apprised here that prior to the assembling of the illegal
and unauthorized Convention elected in 1864, inflammatory, insurrectionary
speeches were made to a mob composed of white and colored persons,
urging on them to arm and equip themselves for protecting and sustaining
the Convention in its illegal and unauthorized proceedings, calculated to
upturn and supersede the State Government of Louisiana, which had been
recognized by the Government of the United States.'
" It would seem from reading this pronunciamento that Andrew Johnson,
at Washington, proposed to inform General Sheridan at New Orleans, of
what had transpired -at the latter place. He at the outset declares that the
Convention was illegal and unauthorized. It is well to inquire where this
humble individual got his authority for such a declaration. It did not and
does not rest in him to determine either of those questions. Dostie had as
much power to decide that the Convention was legal and authorized as
Johnson had to decide to the contrary, and neither "had any authority in the
premises. General Sheridan was neither lawyer nor judge. He was a
soldier, and had taken a soldier's view of that question, that he had no
business to interfere with that Convention until it had committed some overt
act. Having thus assumed the functions of a judge, Johnson proceeds to
advise Sheridan of what he had been apprised. But mark you, he nowhere
asks whether that information was correct. ' We have been apprised here,'
1/2 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
/
he says, 'that prior to the assembling of the Convention inflammatory,
insurrectionary speeches were made to a mod, urging on them to arm and
equip themselves,' etc. His informant was Voorhees, and the information
was, as the country has since learned, false, and as Andrew Johnson might
then have well known. After thus laying down his platform he proceeds to
interrogate General Sheridan, in this wise : ' Further,' he says, 'did the mob
assemble, and was it raised for 'the purpose of assisting the Convention in
its usurpation?'
"He might as well have said, 'General Sheridan. I command you to say
that the friends of the Convention were a mob, and that the Convention
itself contemplated usurpation.' He then inquires whether 'any arms have
been taken from persons supposed to be connected with this mob, and have
various individuals been shot and killed by this mob without good cause.'
The mob to which he refers was the Convention and its friends ; the indi
viduals were the police and city authorities, whom General Sheridan had
already denounced as murderers. Observe that through all this despatch
there is an amazing obliviousness of the murder of helpless and unoffending
Union men, the evidence of which lay spread out before him. With a
cruelty inconceivable, he has no word of inquiry for them. Forty of them,
he has been informed, have been killed, and one hundred and sixty
wounded ; yet he desires to hear nothing on that head. His anxiety
was simply to protect the murderers whom his own hands had armed,
to hide the murders which his own orders had instigated. He asks also
whether steps had been taken by the civil authorities, whom General
Sheridan the day before had stigmatized as murderers, to arrest and try
all those engaged in this riot, which General Sheridan had already
advised him was not a riot but a massacre. In other words, he
desires to know whether the murderers had succeeded in arresting all the
Union men whom they had not succeeded in murdering, and then to
close the door against any possibility of escape, in order that where
rebel knives and bullets had not been effectual, all the loyal men of
New Orleans who had escaped that kind of death, might be handed
over to the not less brutal treatment of a rebel judge and a rebel jury,
he inquires whether ample justice cannot be meted out by the city
authorities to all offenders against the law. In other words, whether the
civil authorities, who, by premeditation and prearrangement, had cause
lessly murdered forty Union men, would not mete out ample justice.
To these questions, infamous beyond precedent, their author, the chief
among these malefactors, desires an early answer.
"The answer came, but it was not such an one as Andrew Johnson had
dictated. He had in General Sheridan, the hero of the Five Forks, no
suppliant tool, no fawning cur to deal with. He had a soldier who had
fought for the Union, and who loved it, who had fought against treason,
and who hated it. To this despatch General Sheridan, on the 6th day
of August, telegraphs an answer. I have already, in describing the pro
ceedings after the meeting of the Convention, used the language employed
by General Sheridan in his answer.
JOHNSON'S RECONSTRUCTION POLICY. 173
" It also appears that the delegates numbered twenty-six ; and of the
friends of the Convention, there were on the outside of the building
eighteen or twenty colored men, women and children ; on the inside,
perhaps fifty more, and that not one in ten was armed. The eighteen
or twenty colored men, women and children made the fearful mob which
loomed in such vast proportions before the frenzied imagination of
Andrew Johnson. The real cause, General Sheridan says, of the massacre,
' was the bitter antagonistic feeling which has been growing in the com
munity since the advent of the present Mayor, who in the organization
of the police force, selected many desperate men, and some of them
known murderers.' This Mayor was Monroe. He owes his place to
Andrew Johnson, and it is Andrew Johnson's policy that keeps him in
it. He was Mayor of New Orleans when that city surrendered to
Butler. He is Mayor of New Orleans now. The murderers whom he
placed upon the police force were and are the friends of Andrew John
son, supporters of his policy, and the bloody work which they did was
done by his direction.
"The General also informs the President that it is useless to attempt to dis
guise the hostility that exists there towards Northern men ; that if the matter is
permitted to pass over without a thorough and determined prosecution of those
engaged in it, frequent scenes of the same kind may be expected there and
in other places ; that no steps had been taken by the city authorities to
arrest the citizens engaged in the massacre, or the policemen who perpetra
ted such cruelities ; that the members of the Convention had been indicted
by the Grand Jury, and many of them arrested and held to bail, and that
Judge Abel was one of the most dangerous men in New Orleans to the
peace and quiet of the city.
" As I have already said, this answer was sent the 6th of August. Days
and weeks passed away, and the country was kept in ignorance of this
despatch, as well as the one of the 3d of the same month. Both despatches
were damningly conclusive of Andrew Johnson's guilt, and Andrew Johnson
knew it. He suppressed them both. But the hero of the Five Forks
refused to be placed in a false position before the country, and threats of
his resignation brought forth the publication of these despatches on the
24th day of August. And it is thus that ' my policy ' is vindicated, a
policy which thus far has been fruitful of nothing but murder and out
rage ; a hostility towards Northern men ; a denial of justice to them by
the courts. These are the evidences of that loyalty which Andrew
Johnson and his followers claim is sufficiently manifest to entitle the
people of the State of Louisiana to immediate representation in Congress.
"On the 6th of August, Johnson is advised that unless those engaged in
the massacre at New Orleans are subjected to a thorough and determined
prosecution, frequent scenes of the same kind may be expected there and
elsewhere.
" But we have yet to hear that a single one of the guilty participants in
that massacre ,has been arrested. By thus passing unheeded the advice
of Sheridan, he invites the consequences which Sheridan says will follow.
LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
He invites the repetition of those acts, the murder of Union men at New
Orleans and elsewhere. Sheridan recommended the removal of that 'bad
man,' Mayor Monroe, but Monroe still continues to be Mayor of New
Orleans.
" Six weeks ago Andrew Johnson was informed that no steps had been
taken to arrest the citizens engaged in the massacre, or the policeman
who perpetrated such cruelities, and we have to learn that a step in that
direction has yet been taken.
" And so the record stands that Andrew Johnson, knowing their guilt,
shields and protects these murderers at New Orleans. But the members of
the Convention have been indicted by a rebel jury, arrested by rebel
officers, and held to bail by rebel courts. Guilty of no offence, and advised
of their innocence, Andrew Johnson suffers this added outrage to go
unpunished, and in order that the law may be trampled upon and over
ridden, and justice denied them, suffers Abel to continue a Judge after being
told that he is a dangerous man to the peace and quiet of New Orleans.
" The man guilty of all these crimes is to-day President of the United
States. This is his policy. With the blood of the slaughtered Union men
of New Orleans upon his hands, he makes the tour of the loyal North,
insults its sentiment, defies its representatives, and threatens more violence
in the future.
" He knows the people but poorly. They are as resolutely resolved to
save this Union to-day as they ever have been. That purpose, rest assured-
will be achieved, and whoever stands in the way of its accomplishment will
be crushed finer than powder."
CHAPTER XL
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1868.
MR. STORKS ELECTRIFIES THE PEOPLE OF MAINE- -A TRIUMPHAL PROGRESS —
HIS EFFORTS IN HIS OWN STATE — THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY UNCHANGED
AND UNREFORMED— THE RECONSTRUCTION MEASURES — THE FOURTEENTH
AMENDMENT — "DEAD ISSUES" — WHAT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY HAS
ACHIEVED— PENDLETON'S REPUDIATION PLAN — THE RECORD OF HORATIO
SEYMOUR.
FOUR days after the close of the impeachment proceedings
and acquittal of Andrew Johnson in the United States Senate,
the Republican party held their fourth National Convention at
Chicago, May 2Oth, 1868, and adopted a platform declaring that the
Southern States had forfeited their position in the Union by seces
sion, and could only be re-admitted on terms satisfactory to Congress.
They nominated General Grant for President, and Mr. Colfax of
Indiana for Vice-President. The Democrats met at New York in
July, and nominated Horatio Seymour and Frank P. Blair. Their
platform demanded that the Southern States should immediately
and unconditionally be given representation in Congress, and that
the regulation of suffrage should be left to the States. The cam
paign was one of the most exciting in the history of the
country, and the people affirmed the right of Congress to lay
down rules for the re-admission of the rebellious States, by an
overwhelming and decisive majority.
Mr. Storrs took an active part in the campaign, and stumped
the State of Maine on behalf of the Republican candidates during
his summer vacation, besides making several speeches to large
gatherings in the State of his adoption on his return home. His
Maine audiences were enthusiastically delighted with him. His
175
LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
humorous illustrations and strong power of invective were some
thing quite new to them. The account of how he was discovered
by the State Committee is interesting. The Boston Journal, of
August 24th, said of him: " This able and eloquent young Western
orator is doing good yeoman service in Maine. He is completely
electrifying the people, and is accomplishing much good. Mr.
Storrs is not extensively known in New England. He was visit
ing the sea-coast of Maine for rest and recreation ; but letters
from the West to prominent Republicans there spoke of him in
such glowing terms that he was sought out, and on the 5th
instant, at the Lancaster Hall (Grant and Colfax headquarters)
dedication, he spoke with Hon. George S. Boutwell of Groton.
It was the best stump speech listened to for years, and at once
the Republican State Committee secured him, and he has been
speaking nightly ever since. He spoke again at Portland on the
1 9th and the City Hall was a complete jam and the greatest
enthusiasm prevailed. Mr. Storrs is a young lawyer, for years a
resident at the West, and has a large and valuable first-class
practice, standing among the leading members of the profession.
He possesses a full and melodious voice of rare power, and a
highly educated mind, of keen thought and research, and his
arguments are rapid and strong. Notwithstanding the solidity of
his forensic qualities, his wit, sarcasm, and invective are unequal
led, making the rare requisites of a first-rate stump speaker. The
' Down Easters ' have been revelling in the glorious benefits of
his services, and we learn he will be in Boston in the course of
ten days. We hope a grand Republican mass meeting will be
held at Faneuil Hall, and Mr. Storrs be invited to address the
people here."
The Portland Daily Press, August nth, reports one of Mr.
Storrs' first meetings in a brief despatch from Augusta, which
says, — " Hon. E. A. Storrs, of Chicago, addressed an immense
assembly of the people at this place this evening. Hundreds were
unable to gain entrance at the hall. Large delegations came up
from Hallowell and Gardiner to hear this eloquent orator of the
West, who, as he entered the hall, was received with a perfect
storm of applause."
The Portland correspondent of the Boston Journal thus reports
Mr. Storrs' speech at that city on the iQth of August:
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 868. 1 77
"The Republicans of this city held, this evening, at - the City Hall, the
largest and most successful rally for years. The hall was crowded and
overflowing. Long before the meeting commenced, the galleries were filled
with ladies. Gen. Mattocks made a most pertinent speech upon assuming
the chair. Hon. E. A. Storrs of Illinois was then introduced, and was
received with a perfect storm of applause. His speech was one of the
grandest efforts ever listened to in Maine. In ability, keen argument, lofty
sentiment, and persuasive eloqence, it has not been equaled. It cannot be
reported with justice. Cheers, loud and strong, were given at the close of
the address for Mr. Storrs, for Grant and Colfax, and the good cause."
The Portland Daily Press gave the following report of the
meeting :
" We made a mistake when we urged that Mr. Storrs should be kept
in this State, whether he was willing or not. The fact is, Portland is
especially proud of the City Hall, and regards its capacity as absolutely
illimitable. Mr. Storrs has dispelled that little illusion and brought us to
grief. Perhaps three quarters of the people that wanted to hear him
last night got a chance to sit, or stand, or roost. It was a magnificent
example of close packing. Not an inch to spare anywhere. The ladies
regarded the proposition that they should occupy the galleries as decidedly
cool. It couldn't be done. They invaded the floor and the stage — a wel
come incursion they made, too. They were out in greater numbers than
ever seen before in this city at a political meeting. Hundreds of our citi
zens went away, being unable to obtain an entrance to the hall.
" N. A. Foster, Esq., chairman of the city committee, called Gen. C. P.
Mattocks to the chair. General Mattocks then introduced Mr. H. C. Lovell,
who led off in singing "Grant goes marching on," in which the whole
assembly joined, with inspiriting effect. The grand old "John Brown"
song, whose prophetic notes were sung through all the southern land by
Union soldiers, never sounded more impressive and appropriate. Then
General Mattocks made a very brief introductory speech, which was quite
a model for that sort of an effort.
"Then came Storrs. It needed not the applause and the cheering notes
of the band to tell him he was welcome. Every face present beamed with
welcome and with delighted anticipation.
" Mr. Storrs said that we had supposed that the war had accomplished at
least two things, — the liberation of the Southern negroes, and of the
Northern Democrats. The slavery of the latter was quite as oppressive
as that of the negro ; politically they had been under the whip of the slave
driver for twenty-five years. But they seemed to like it. Let them con
tinue it if it suited them. In time of war, the Republican party was a war
party. In time of peace, we are a peace party. We are in favor of peace
now. The Democratic party during the war were in favor of peace. Now
that we have conquered a peace, they are in favor of war.
"The only issue distinctly presented by the Democratic platform is found
I78
LIFE OF EMERY A. STORRS.
in the declaration that the reconstruction laws of Congress are unconstitutional,
revolutionary, and void. It is their declared purpose, in the event they suc
ceed, to disperse the State governments organized under those laws. This,
during the next four years, could only be accomplished by force. The employ
ment of force for that purpose is war. The rebellion did not operate to
deprive the government of its rightful power over the seceding States and
their people. It did, however, impair and very seriously affect the rights
of those States and the people thereof, within the Union which they sought
to destroy. The larceny of an overcoat does not affect the title of the
rightful owner; it does, however, very seriously affect the rights of the
thief after he is caught. At the close of the war, the Southern States were
without organic law, or any power to make any. Their existence as Con
federate States had been destroyed by our act. Their existence as States
within the Union had been destroyed by tneir own act. Mr. Lincoln
declared that the State Government of those States had been subverted,
and that the people had forfeited their political privileges. Upon this theory
Johnson acted. He appointed 'State Governors ; he fixed suffrage qualifica
tions. Our work was not the restoration of the old government ; it was the
constitution of new ones. Johnson, however, in his message contended
that the State governments had been merely suspended. That theory
implies that at the close of the war, the rebel people and governments
were at once remitted to all their old rights and privileges within the Union ;
so that nothing remained to restore to the rebels all their suspended privi
leges. In other words, just as often as we beat them during the war they
gained their former privileges ; and just as often as they defeated us they
lost their political power and rights in the Union. Accordingly a Confeder
ate victory in the field was the loss of Confederate rights within the Union,
and a Confederate defeat, finally, was the restoration of all their suspended
political privileges.
" Congress having the power to wage war, had, as a necessary consequence,
the right to wage it according to the laws and usages of war. A civil war
is governed by the same rules as control different nationalities in war with
each other. The relations subsisting between the rebels and the govern
ment at the close of the war were those of conqueror and conquered. -We
conquered the Confederate armies, the Southern people, and the Confederate
State governments. Our victory was their political annihilation. Our rights
were the rights of the conqueror. We compelled the surrender, not only
of their armies, but of the political ideas for which they fought.
"In the process of reconstruction, the question was, What share in the
reconstruction of the government shall be entrusted to those who have
sought its destruction? The Republican party has decided this question.
Their policy has taken its final shape in the fourteenth amendment. Under
their policy eight States have been brought back into the Union. And
again we are confronted with the question, Should this policy be reversed,
and the demand of the Democratic party for immediate and unconditional
restoration be complied with? The reversal of that policy is the overthrow
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 868. 1/9
of all that we have achieved by the war. That accomplished, we need not
talk about taxation. The result would not merely be a burden upon the
nation ; it would be the ruin of the nation. To such a policy, Horatio
Seymour stands committed.
The Democratic platform, the national debt, and Horatio Seymour's
record, were then reviewed in turn and in a manner that attracted and held
the closest attention of the audience and elicited the heartiest applause.
His comments upon the platform adopted at the New York Convention
were severe but just. The leaders of the rebellion framed that platform,
and went into the Convention demanding the immediate restoration of the
seceded States and amnesty for all past offenses, and the platform framed
by those who had planned and led on the rebellion was adopted as the
platform of the Democratic party. His remarks in relation to the national
debt, and the justice of meeting our obligations, not by promises in green
backs, but by a just payment of them, met with a hearty response from
every one present. Horatio Seymour's record was presented in a true and
just manner. The orator traced his tortuous course from 1861 to 1868,
especially when he was Governor of the State of New York, and quoted
from his addresses to prove that at heart he was in favor of the secession
of the Southern States. In alluding to the speech Governor Seymour made
to the mob of New York, whom he styled "my friends," Mr. Storrs said,
— referring to the work of Governor Seymour's "friends" in the murder of
Colonel O'Brien and the burning of an orphan asylum, — "Don't you wish
General Chamberlain had been there with four Maine regiments, and Gen
eral Logan with four Illinois regiments? These proceedings would have
been quickly stopped, and the number of Democratic voters somewhat less
ened." Mr Storrs closed his address by taking up the parable of the
prodigal son, and comparing the conduct of the south and their present
demands with those made by him of scripture history.
"Mr. Storrs spoke two hours, his remarks being frequently interrupted by
the enthusiastic applause of his hearers, enchaining the closest attention of
the largest audience ever convened in the hall."
Editorially, the same paper said : — " The speaker's review of
Mr. Seymour's status during the war and now, was the most
powerful analysis of human character that we ever heard in a
like effort. His picture of the July day of 1863, before the for
mer had heard of the ' promised victories,' was from a master
hand. Indeed, it was, throughout the two hours, an entertain
ment that is not offered to any people very often, and the pro
longed interest of the occasion has seldom been witnessed in this
community. The audience was moved to tumultous enthusiasm
by the closing portions of the address, and it may justly be set
down as one of the most interesting and significant political
meetings of many years."
ISO LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
He was next heard from at Waldoborough, which seems to have
been one of the Maine Democratic strongholds. The reporter of
the Portland Press gives the following account of his appearance
there :
" Hon. E. A. Storrs of Chicago was next introduced. He said it was
a pleasure to him to bring greetings of good cheer from the people of
Illinois to those of Maine. He did bring good cheer. From the first
word he spoke to his eloquent and pathetic peroration the excitement
and enthusiasm of the audience were almost unprecedented. The famous
declaration of a despairing reporter, who said in reference to an elo
quent orator that 'it was impossible to report the aurora borealis,' would
apply to Mr. Storrs. In reference to him and the speech he delivered last
night, we can only say this: Let the Republicans in any doubtful part of
the State — if there is such a place — compel him, by violence if necessary, to
address them. Let him expose the meanness of the Democratic opposition
to negro suffrage, with the keen and polished satire and exuberant wit in
which he is singularly felicitous ; let him play Horatio Seymour, as he did
last night, leaving him exposed to the world in all the hideousness of
his treason-stained character ; let him make the comparison between Sey
mour, 'the patent leather hero of New York,' prating of the Constitution
while civil war threatened the life of the nation, to the man who in the
midst of a storm at sea besought his fellow passengers to save his mar
riage certificate while he left his wife to sink gurgling into the water ;
let him not forget to travesty the Democratic story of ' the prodigal son.'
If these measures are taken with Mr. Storrs, we will insure a large
Republican majority even in Waldoborough."
Another meeting at Bath, in the same State, on the 25th of
August, is thus reported in a special despatch to the Boston
Journal :
"A large mass meeting was held on the Park this evening, which was
presided over by Hon. Henry Tollman, a faithful adherent of the Democra
tic party for the past forty years, but who now repudiates the nominations
of Seymour and Blair, and will support Grant and Colfax. The gathering
was held for two hours by one of the most eloquent arguments ever listened
to by a Maine audience, from the great orator from the Western prairies,
Hon. E. A. Storrs. The speaker was received with immense cheering
and was often interrupted by most enthusiastic applause, and the meeting
closed with rousing cheers for the speaker, Governor Chamberlain, and
Grant and Colfax. Not less than three thousand people were present."
The Boston Daily Advertiser, in its editorial summary, noticed
Mr. Storrs' campaign efforts as follows :
"There is no mistake about their being wide awake in Maine.
The Republicans will carry the State by a large majority ; but
they are determined to increase on their vote of last year, and
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 868. l8l
the unusual animation of the Democrats has had a very good
effect in stimulating our friends to extra exertions. Among the
numerous excellent speakers now in the State is Mr. Stprrs, a
lawyer from Chicago, who is doing excellent service. He is a
capital stump speaker, with a pleasing eloquence and abundance
of wit and humor, He spoke in Brunswick on Monday evening
(August 24th) to the largest political gathering ever assembled
on the Mall, and in Bath last evening. It is matter of regret
that his time is limited, but we are glad to learn that he is to
speak in Boston on his return home."
His next speech in Maine was at Bridgton, in the northern
part of the State. An immense gathering of Republicans from
the surrounding country, numbering from four to six thousand,
was held in a grove in the afternoon, and in the evening Mr.
Storrs addressed a meeting at the Town Hall. The Portland
Press said that the hall " was crowded to its utmost capacity,
while hundreds remained outside. Hon. E. A. Storrs, of Illinois,
made one of his telling speeches, occupying almost one hour and
a half. This gentleman has done good service for the Republican
cause in this State, and his closing speech at Bridgton was well
calculated to arouse the enthusiasm of every Republican present.
It was the greatest demonstration ever got up in the northern
part of the State."
Returning to Portland, Mr. Storrs made his farewell speech at
a large and enthusiastic rally, of which the Portland correspondent
of the Boston Daily Advertiser gave a graphic description :
" Last Friday evening, the little Republican army, to the
number of 400, marched through the streets with their torches
and transparencies, and really made a fine display. Several flags
were raised, and the < wide awakes ' participated. Many of the
houses along the line of march were illuminated, and other dem
onstrations were made to show the interest and appreciation of
those who were honored by the visit of the torchers. The
houses on Munjoy Hill especially attracted the attention of every
one, flags being flung out, in many of them every window being
illuminated, with here and there quite a display of fireworks.
When the procession reached the Falmouth Hotel, on its return
from Munjoy, Hon. E. A. Storrs of Chicago was called out, and
made a short speech. The Republicans have had no one here,
1 82 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORRS.
this year at least, who has been so favorably received as Mr.
Storrs. His arguments and his peculiar manner of putting his
points seem to captivate his audiences, and it is to be regretted
that he cannot be prevailed upon to remain in this State and
'stump' till November."
The Portland Press, in its report of the demonstration, said :
" Upon arriving in front of the Falmouth Hotel, Hon. E. A.
Storrs of Chicago, who is a guest there, was called out. Of
course he was ready. The more speeches he makes, the fresher
and more entertaining he grows. He spoke in most encouraging
terms of the prospect in this State, and assured his hearers that
Illinois would answer Maine's 20,000 with a majority of 40,000.
He described in humorous language the solemn procession of
Copperheads and conservatives that will on the third of Novem
ber wend its weary way up Salt River. The effect of Mr. Storrs'
remarks was, as usual, electric, and all his hearers most earnestly
hoped that he had not made his farewell speech to the citizens
of Portland."
A parting tribute was paid him by the Boston Journal, Sep
tember 7th :
" Hon. E. A. Storrs, the eloquent young Western orator, who
has been doing such excellent service in the campaign in Maine,
reached this city yesterday on his way home, and will remain
until Monday. He bears with him to his Western home the
thanks of the thousands of Republicans in Maine who have
listened to his eloquent words, and have been stimulated by them
to more earnest effort in behalf of the good cause. From what
he has seen on his tour in Maine, Mr. Storrs is confident that
Maine will 'roll on the ball' which Vermont started last Tuesday."
From these notices of the first campaign in which Mr. Storrs
was prominently engaged, it would seem that he had thus early
encountered a difficulty which always troubled him down to the
last ten years of his life, — the want of adequate reporting. The
Maine papers found that he " could not be reported with justice,"
and one of them likened the attempt to " reporting the aurora
borealis." Even in Chicago, at that day, short-hand reporting
was in its infancy, and most of the verbatim reports of speeches
by public men were printed from their own manuscript, or not
at all. Mr. Storrs was quick to observe and prompt to accom-
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 868. 1 83
modate himself to the exigencies of the crude newspaper staffs
of that period ; he wrote out his speeches with his own hand or
by the aid of a clerk, and the newspapers were exceedingly glad
to publish them. During his trip in Maine, which was meant
for a holiday but was turned into a season of very hard cam
paign work, he had no opportunity to furnish the press with a
copy of any of his speeches. The impression he made by his
personal address is sufficiently conveyed by the quotations made
above from the Maine and Boston papers ; to those of Chicago
we must turn for a textual report of his argument.
In the fall of 1868, after his return home from the East, he
addressed a large meeting at St. Charles, Illinois, on the issues
of the campaign. The Chicago Tribune published his speech in
full. It is here reprinted from its columns.
"In 1860 the Democratic party forfeited public confidence and was driven
from power. In 1864, it demanded that it should receive from the people
the confidence it had forfeited four years before, and asked to be restored
to power. The nation answered this demand, and with overwhelming major
ities declared that it was not entitled to public confidence, and that the
reasons which had induced the people to drive it from power in
1860 had been intensified and multiplied. Two years later, in 1866, they
again went before the people, their claims were re-examined, and, with
increased emphasis, rejected. To-day, the same party again appeals to the
country and again asks that the interests of the nation be entrusted to its
keeping. It is our business to inquire : First, whether the three verdicts given
against the Democratic party were righteous verdicts ; and second, if they
were, what they have done since then to restore confidence in them. That
the verdict rendered against the Democratic party in 1860 was a righteous
one, I will not attempt to prove to you here. That party sought to fasten
the institution of slavery upon free territories. It sought to protect it there
by all the powers of the General Government. It appealed to the people
for aid in this wicked purpose, and the people righteously refused it. Nor
need I spend much time in demonstrating that the verdict of 1864 was warranted
by all the facts in the case. It then declared the war an experiment, and the
experiment a failure; demanded that hostilities should cease, which would have
resulted in the immediate recognition of the independence of the Southern Con
federacy by every foreign power. The righteousness of the popular verdict ren
dered in 1866 was equally clear to us. The rebellion having been crushed by
force of arms, the Democratic party insisted that neither rebel state nor
rebel citizen had lost anything by his crime ; that he should be permitted to
dictate the terms of his re-admission to the Union which he had sought to
destroy, and should be made the custodian of the interests of a nation
which he had wickedly sought to overthrow.
" Assuredly, then, the Democratic party cannot successfully ask us to
184 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
restore them to power, on the ground that our former judgments against
it have been erroneous, nor can it ask us to reverse the decisions delivered
by the people in 1860, 1864 and 1866. Their claim for support must rest,
not upon the ground that they were innocent of the crimes of which the
people convicted them at those great public trials, but that, confessing their
guilt, they have atoned for it by public services since rendered, of a char
acter sufficiently important to entitle them to a full and complete pardon
from the people against whom they had offended. And hence it is that
the demand made by the Democratic party to-day for power cannot be
entertained, .unless it has either an entirely new set of leaders, or different
views upon the questions which have divided the country for the past
eight years, from those which it has held for the past eight years, or unless
all those questions have passed out of political controversy, and have been
replaced by entirely new issues.
<( That the leaders of the Democratic party are the same they have been
for the past eight years, every one knows. Seymour and Vallandigham,
Pendleton and Belmont, Henry Clay Dean and Brick Pomeroy were
leaders in the Democratic party in 1864 and they are leaders in the same
party in 1868. Wade Hampton and Toombs, Fort Pillow Forrest and
Beauregard were leaders in the Democratic party in 1860; their operations
North were suspended by four years of war, at the close of which they
promptly fill their old positions as leaders in the Democratic party of the
nation.
" Not only has there been no change of leaders, but there has been no
abandonment of the position which the party has held on political issues.
They denounced coercion as unconstitutional. We have yet to learn that
their opinions have met with any change on that point. They opposed
every measure adopted by the administration for the prosecution of the war.
They denounced the first call for troops as unauthorized. They denounced
the proclamation of emancipation as unconstitutional. They opposed the
means adopted by Congress for raising money, as unconstitutional. They
claimed that the conscription law was revolutionary, unconstitutional and
void, and sought to prevent its execution by force. They declared the war
a failure. We have yet to learn that they do not hold these opinions still.
These were questions which we discussed up to the close of the war. With
reference to them, the position of the Democratic party is unchanged, and
our verdict must be the same that it has always been.
"It is true that they have assumed a somewhat different form, but in
substance there has been no change. They are the same to-day as when
the rebellion began and closed. In his last message to Congress, James
Buchanan, the last Democratic president, declared that the government had
no authority to coerce a State. The limit of national authority, he said, was
to assist the judges and the marshals, and they having all resigned in the
seceding States, there was nobody to assist and consequently nothing could
be done. James Buchanan died a Democrat. The Attorney-General, Jere
miah S. Black, wrote a long opinion holding the same doctrine. Horatio
Seymour declared that an attempt at coercion was no less revolutionary
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 868. 185
than secession. This, at the outbreak of the war, was the position of what
then remained of the Democratic party as a political organization. But the
people believed that the government could coerce a State, and the attempt
was made. Three years afterwards, and in 1864, the Democratic party
declared the attempt a failure. In other words they said: 'We told in 1861
you could not coerce a State. You have tried and you have failed. Your
failure proves that you cannot coerce those States.' Up to that time cer
tainly the issues were the same. But the surrender of Lee having demon
strated that a rebellious State and its people could be coerced as a matter
of fact, because they had been and were coerced, the same question again
arose when the nation proposed to reconstruct and rehabilitate those States.
Having defeated the rebellion in arms, overturned their entire political sys
tem, and conquered the people of the rebellious States, we insisted in 1866,
that they must recognize the validity of the national debt contracted to sup
press the rebellion, that the freedmen should be entitled to citizenship, and
that slavery, to perpetuate which the rebellion was inaugurated, must be
abolished. We insisted in 1866 that upon the recognition of these ideas,
and their incorporation into the organic law, depended a return to them of
the full enjoyment of political privileges within the Union. Our right to
make these demands was denied. The Democratic party claimed that those
rebellious States, immediately at the close of the war, occupied a position
of entire equality with the loyal States, and that the government had no
right to coerce them into a delivery into the hands of the nation of the results
and fruits of the victories which the nation had achieved over them. In other
words, that party declared to the government, 'you have no rightful power to
coerce a State ; you can make the attempt ; you may overcome the armies
which rebellious States call into the field ; but your success and their defeat
give no rightful superiority of position over them. You have no right to
affix terms of their re-admission, because you have no right to coerce them.'
Under such a doctrine victory to the nation brought no results.
The people, however, decided, in 1866, that they had the right to dictate
terms to a conquered rebellion, and demanded that their representatives in
Congress should exercise that right. Refusing to accept the constitutional
amendments proffered by Congress, that body undertook by a series of
measures called the reconstruction acts, to enforce substantially those terms
upon the South, in other words, to coerce them into yielding up to the
nation the fruits of the victories which it had achieved. As a result of
these measures, what has been known as the Fourteenth Constitutional
Amendment has been adopted, which declares: i. The citizenship of the
negro, and protects it from invasion by any State legislation. 2. Denies
representation for those citizens who are deprived by State legislation of
the right of suffrage. 3. Deprives certain classes of rebels of the right of
holding certain offices, conferring, however, upon Congress the right to
remove the disability. 4. Establishes the validity of the public debt and
repudiates the rebel debt, and finally, confers upon Congress the power
to enforce those provisions by appropriate legislation. Under these meas
ures, eight of the seceding States have been re-admitted, they having paid
1 86 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
the price of their admission by the ratification of this amendment to the
Constitution. This, indeed, looked like coercion. It was as complete a
coercion of rebel political ideas and principles as the overthrow of Lee's
army, and its forced surrender was a coercion of the military power of the
Southern States.
"True to the old instincts — preferring that the old issues should still be
kept alive and the old questions still be agitated — the Democratic party
met in National Convention at the City of New York, on the 4th day of
July, 1868, and solemnly declared that the reconstruction measures of
Congress were usurpations — revolutionary, unconstitutional and void. If
that declaration be true, and such be the opinion of the people, as a mat-
fcr of course the fourteenth amendment falls with those measures of which
it is the offspring. The State governments organized under it also fall,
and it will indeed be true that the General Government has no power to
coerce a State in rebellion against its authority. It may conquer by mere
force, its armies, but all such measures as it may see fit to adopt to secure
the results of its victories will be ' usurpations — revolutionary, unconstitutional
and void.' Whether this nation has a right to coerce a State in rebellion
against its authority into obedience to its authority, and whether to render
that coercion effectual it may demand guarantees for future peace, is the
distinct question put to the people by the Democratic party in its platform.
It is the same question which we have thrice settled at the ballot box
within the last eight years. The position of the Democratic party on that
question is unchanged. And so I confidently believe the position of the
people on that question is unchanged and unchangeable. This fourth
decision at the ballot-box will, I believe, be final.
"The Democratic platform not only denounces the reconstruction meas
ures in the general language which I have quoted, but 'it takes direct issue
with almost every provision of the fourteenth amendment. It denies to the
freedmen one of the highest attributes of citizenship, the right of suffrage,
and demands that the exercise of that right shall be regulated by the citi
zens of rebellious States, who were the nation's enemies, against the freed
men, who were the nation s friends. It demands that the national debt
created to crush the rebellion shall be paid in an irredeemable promise,
thus destroying its validity declared in the fourteenth amendment, and add
ing to the crime of repudiation all the calamities of a worthless currency,
or the imposition of onerous and unendurable taxation. It demands the
taxation of the Government bonds, none of which being held in the rebel
lious States, would devolve additional burdens upon the loyal people of the
country. It demands the immediate restoration of all the States, of course
without condition. Such a declaration of principles opens every question
which the war settled. It renders our victories valueless ; for if the seced
ing States are to return to the Union in precisely the same position they
left it — which would be the case were the reconstruction measures of Con
gress declared by the voice of the people revolutionary, unconstitutional
and void — the war is a failure. Five hundred thousand lives have been
sacrificed, and three thousand millions of dollars expended in vain.
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 868.
"And yet with such a platform of principles, and with candidates upon
it who propose to carry it out by force, we are constantly told that all dis
cussion of the war and its results is the discussion of a dead issue. They
entreat us to 'let bygones be bygones,' and to 'let the dead past bury its
dead.' With a platform that would upset all that the war has accom
plished, we are asked to say nothing about the war. With a platform which
thrusts into our very faces every issue that the war settled, and demands
that even by violence those issues must be resettled, and in another way,
which demands that we shall repudiate every vote we have given for the
last eight years, we are asked to forget the past. Wade Hampton, with the
smoke of burning loyal homes still clinging to his garments, whose hands
are red with the blood of our brothers and our sons, and Forrest, fresh from
the atrocities of Fort Pillow, demanded that the States which they carried
into and aided in rebellion, shall suffer nothing for their great crime, and
beseechingly entreat us to let bygones be bygones. If a forcible attempt is
made to despoil you of your property and destroy your homes, you can
hardly regard such an attempt as a bygone, until it is adequately protected
against all future attacks of the same character. But it would be quite in
keeping with this Democratic platform for the robber and the incendiary
yet hovering around your home, kept at a respectful distance by barricades
which you had erected, and watchmen whom you had placed about it for
its protection, to denounce those barricades and watchmen as revolutionary,
unconstitutional and void ; and whenever you referred to the old robberies
and burnings, to entreat you to let bygones be bygones. I apprehend that,
coming from the old robber and the old incendiary, you would regard a
proposition to remove your watchmen and barricades, as a renewal of an
attempt to despoil your property and burn your home, and as, substantially, the
same old question. Such a barricade, guarding for the future the results
of our victories, protecting us against rebellion in the future, is the four
teenth constitutional amendment. It is demanded by those who sought to
destroy the nation, that that barrier be removed. It is the same old ques
tion. I make the same old answer — No.
"The Democratic party having done nothing to win back your confidence,
has the Republican party been guilty of any acts which would justify the
withdrawal of public confidence from it? Mr. Pendleton, in his speech at
Springfield, arraigns the Republican party before the people, and proposes
that it be tried and convicted on its history. By its history we are quite
willing that it should be tried. By that test let it stand or fall. If within
the comparatively short period of its existence, it has achieved nothing for the
cause of humanity and the interests of good government ; if under its sway
freedom "has made no progress, and the nation itself no advancement, it
deserves to forfeit public confidence ; it deserves removal from power.
"In detailing the history of the Republican party, Mr. Pendleton in his
speech at Springfield, said: 'The Republican party, on the other hand,
is not of long duration. It was founded in 1856, upon the ruins of the old
Whig party. But all wrho were sectional, all who were fanatical, all who
hated the Constitution, all who hated the Union, all who were dissatisfied,
1 88 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
went into the Republican organization, and they carried with them many
dissatisfied Democrats. I need not tell you that the infancy of this party
was marked by the bloody troubles in Kansas, and by the invasion of
Virginia by John Brown of Ossaw atomic. I need not tell you that its
advent to power in 1860 was marked by the destruction of the harmony
which up to that time had existed among the people ; that it was marked
by an attempt at dissolution of the ties which bound our States together ;
that it was marked by the sorrows and miseries of the greatest civil war of
which history has given us any record. But these parties, — the Republican
party and Democratic party — to-day stand where they stood in the begin
ning, carrying out to their logical conclusions the principles upon which they
were founded.'
" It is not of decisive consequence in determining the merits of the Repub
lican party from its history to know how its infancy was marked, nor by what
events its advent was marked. It is true that its infancy was marked by the
bloody troubles in Kansas, but it is equally true that those bloody marks
upon the infancy of the Republican party, and upon the history of the nation,
were all made by Democratic hands, and all bear the impress of Democratic
fingers. The question is not so much what were the marks, but who made
the marks ? The bloody troubles in Kansas were the outgrowth of a wicked
attempt of the Democratic party and a Democratic administration to force
upon that territory, against the will of its people, by violence and fraud and
bloodshed, the blighting curse of slavery. It is equally true that during
the infancy of the Republican party, John Brown with thirteen men, invaded
Virginia. For an attempt to liberate the slave he was tried and hung.
That the Republican party was responsible for John Brown's raid Mr. Pen-
dleton dare not assert. The men who hung John Brown were Democrats.
The body of the old hero was hardly cold in its grave before his execu
tioners had kindled the flames of civil war, had been guilty of the vilest
treason against the nation and are now demanding the overthrow of those
laws enacted to prevent another rebellion. The memory of John Brown's
executioners will be handed to infamy. But though 'John Brown's body
lies mouldering in the grave, his soul goes marching on.'
" The advent of the Republican party to power was, Mr. Pendleton
informs us, marked ' by the destruction of the harmony which up to that
time, had existed among the people.' It was a curious kind of harmony
which existed during the administration of Pierce and Buchanan. ' Order,'
it was once said, ' reigns in Warsaw.' The Poles had all-been slaughtered.
It was the order which despotism brings about, by the destruction of those who
chafe under it. It was the quiet of death. The Poles all massacred, order
reigned in Warsaw. The voice of freedom having been hushed, and her
slightest utterance choked, harmony prevailed, for the slave-driver had every
thing his own way. We are also told that the advent of the Republican
party was marked ' by an attempt at dissolution of the ties which bound
our States together.' That is true, but the truth of the statement is the
everlasting disgrace of the Democratic party. The attempt at dissolution
was made by the Democratic party, for no other reason than that
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 868. 189
Abraham Lincoln was elected President of the United States. It was an
attempt of measureless wickedness and causelessness, which Mr. Pendleton
did not attempt to prevent, but rather urged on by saying to those actively
engaged in it, ' I would mark their departure with tokens of affection, I
would bid them adieu so tenderly that their hearts would be touched by the
recollection of it.' For the wickedness of this attempt and for the attempt
itself, Mr. Pendleton and the Democratic party are alone responsible. They
made no effort to prevent the attempt being made ; they put forth no exer
tion to prevent it succeeding. The infamy of this attempt rests alone upon
the shoulders of the Democratic party. The humiliations and disasters of
its defeat should be born by them alone, and the glory of its overthrow
belongs alone to the great loyal people, who proved themselves as able to
meet and overcome the Democratic party in the field, as at the ballot-Jpox.
Mr. Pendleton also graciously assures the liberty-loving men of this country,
that their advent to power was ' marked by the sorrows and miseries
of the greatest civil war of which history has given us any record.' This
is true again, and it is also true that for that war, and all the sorrows
and miseries which it entailed, the Democratic party is alone responsible.
These sorrows and miseries are indeed marked deeply upon the history of
the country, and their guilty authors will not soon be forgotten. The
responsibility for that gigantic crime, and the griefs resulting from it, as a
part of the burdens which the Democratic party must carry down with it
through all history, is engraved upon the heart of every mother whose boy
died in the great cause ; it is witnessed by the tear of every widowed wife
whose husband fell from Southern bullets, or perished ultimately in a
Southern prison-pen. There is not a desolate home in all the land, nor a
deserted fireside, made so by this wicked rebellion, that does not bear
eloquent testimony that all those marks of desolating grief were made by
Democratic hands. And all the countless graves of the slain heroes of the
republic are marks of misery and suffering made by Democratic rebels,
not only on the peaceful advent of a great party to power, but upon the
pages of our country's and the world's history. All these ' marks ' which
Mr. Pendleton flourishingly parcels, were made by the Democratic party.
When the burglar can safely denounce the merchant, because his advent to
a prosperous business was marked by a robbery of his substance ; when the
incendiary can denounce his victim because his advent to his new home
was marked by its conflagration, then let the Democratic party, North and
South, denounce the Republicans because their advent to power was marked
by the miseries of a war which Democrats began by an attempt at dissolu
tion, in which they alone engaged. We gladly accept Mr. Pendleton's
challenge, and will test the claims of the Republicans by what the Repub
lican party has achieved.
"It entered the field in 1856, a protest of the best thought, the highest
culture and the soundest heart of the country, against the aggressions of
the slave power. On behalf of the dignity of free labor, free speech and
free thought, it appealed to the highest motives, and its appeal was nobly
answered.
I9O LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
" Its first great achievement, resulting from the election of Abraham Lin
coln, was the rescue of our vast Western Territories from the grasp of sla
very, and from its blighting effects upon the interests and dignity of labor,
and the dedication of those territories, now prosperous States, to free labor
and to free men. Against this great achievement, up to this time the grand
est event in American history, the Democratic party rebelled. Having
saved the territories to freedom, the Republican party entered on the second
f stage of its career, and its second achievement, wrought out with more than
one-half the Democratic party of the nation in open arms against it, and
the other half in covert opposition, was the salvation of this nation, for all
peoples and to all ages, as the sacred custodian of the priceless treasure of
free government. Its great career was not ended. Having crushed the
rebellion, it determined to rid the country of the evil out of which rebellion
grew, and the nation of the foulest stain, resting upon its fair fame. It
entered at once upon the third stage of its career, and for its third achieve
ment in the interests of humanity, for the cause of good government and in
behalf of the downtrodden and the oppressed, declared that ' neither slavery
nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime, whereof the
party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States,
or any place subject to their jurisdiction.' And yet its work is not finished.
It is now closing the fourth period of its history, and preparing finally, to
consummate its fourth achievement.
"The salvation of the nation, wrought out through the perils of the might
iest rebellion which history records, involved the building of great fleets, the
raising and equipping of gigantic armies. For these purposes a great
national debt was incurred. And that debt the Republican party proposes
to pay.
" It entered upon the great contest with four millions of slaves in the
rebellious States, who, during the entire period of the war, were our friends,
and hundreds and thousands of whom fought for us. It found those slaves
at the close of the war free men. It proposes to make them citizens, and
protect them in the full enjoyment of their rights as citizens. Having
crushed the rebellion, it proposes to protect the nation against its recurrence,
and to withhold from those who sought the destruction of the national life
any share in the control of our national destinies until they have furnished
us the surest evidences that the national interests can be safely entrusted to
their hands.
Thus having carried the nation safely through the perils of the rebellion,
it proposes to gather together the fruits of all its triumphs, and imbed them
in the Constitution of the United States, secure for all the future in the
Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, wherein are secured national
honor, the freedom of the slave, and national security for the future, as a
fitting consummation of the great work of the Republican party, for the
people and for the world. The same opposition which it has encountered
at every period of its progress it now encounters. The Democratic party,
which opposed it in its efforts to give the territories to freedom, which
rebelled w^hen the effort proved a success, which opposed it in its great
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 868. IQI
effort to preserve the national integrity, which opposed it when it gave free
dom, opposes it now, when it seeks to embody all these results in the
organic law, and threatens to tear down the sanctuary in which they are
enshrined, and denounces the great measure by which these results have all
been gathered together as usurpations revolutionary, unconstitutional and
void.
"These are the great events in the history of the Republican party. Con
sidering the mighty consequence of what it has accomplished, it would
seem that it has crowded a thousand years of history into eight short
years of time. It found our territories in the clutch of slavery ;
it broke its hold and dedicated them to freedom. It found the nation
beset by spies and encompassed by treason, trembling upon the
very brink of ruin ; it rescued it from danger. It saved the only
free government on earth. It found four millions of human beings slaves ;
it gave them freedom. It has lifted four millions of chattels out of the night
and barbarism of slavery into the clear pure air of American citizenship.
It has for the first time made American citizenship a living reality —
has made citizenship broader than the mere boundaries of a State ; has
made it in its privileges co-extensive with the whole nation. It has vindica
ted the national faith, and if the people permit, will secure to all the future
domestic prosperity and tranquility, honor and respect abroad. It has vin
dicated the capacity of men for self government, and a united Italy and a
united Germany follow closely upon and result from the example of a
united nationality in this great Republic. All these mighty results, the most
cheering for our hopes of humanity, has the Republican party accomplished
in eight short years? Test it by its history. Judge it by what has been
done, and when you have found that all the parties of which history gives
us any record can produce nothing to compare with these results, you will
decide as you have decided, that whatever mistakes of detail it may have
committed, it is still entitled to the largest measure of our confidence ; that
we are prepared to say to it, ' Well done, good and faithful servant.'
" Besides the general charges which Mr. Pendleton makes against the
Republican party, and to which I have already alluded, he makes several
specific allegations against it, the most important of which seems to relate
to the constitutional amendments. Mr. Pendleton professes an almost idola
trous admiration of the Constitution, insists that our fathers who made it
were wise men, and he said in his speech at Springfield, speaking of the
Constitution : ' I charge upon you who are Democrats .... do not seek to
amend it, do not seek to change it.' We yield ^nothing to Mr. Pendleton
in admiration of the Constitution. We appreciate as fully as he does the
wisdom of our fathers who made it. But we admire it not alone for its
•checks and balances' of which he has so much to say. \Ve do not
regard it as a mere political 'teeter.' We admire it among other reasons
because it was made by the people of the United States ' in order to form a
more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide
for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the
blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity.' We admire it for the
192 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
ample shield of protection which it throws about the citizen in time of
peace. We admire it for the tremendous armory of power which it furnishes
the nation in time of war. We think its framers were wise men, and they
exhibited their wisdom by embodying in the Constitution provisions for its
amendment.
"This nervous anxiety about amendments to the Constitution is a new thing
with the Democratic party. When, in 1860, Mr. Chittenden, for the purpose
of coaxing the South back into the Union which they had determined to
destroy, proposed amendments to the Constitution dedicating vast tracts of
free territory to slavery, and pledging it the protection of the nation, even
against the will of the people of those Territories, no Democrat opposed
such an amendment. They not only did not oppose it, but Mr. Pendleton
among the number, gave it most hearty and cordial support. Again, when
that distinguished Democrat, Mr. Vallandigham, proposed such an amend
ment of the Constitution as worjced a radical change in the very structure
of our government, by having two Presidents, one from the North and one
from the South, Democratic objectors were silent. Again, when Horatio
Seymour proposed a very essential amendment of the Constitution, which
was nothing less than the substitution of the Montgomery Confederate Con
stitution in the place of our own, Democrats did not seem to be particularly
alarmed, nor were they entreatingly besought to take the Constitution home
with them and place it on the family altar next the Bible, where they
might watch it in the intervals of their slumbers, and dream of it when
sleep oppressed their eyelids.
"This new-born anxiety in the Democratic mind about amending the
Constitution springs from the fact that the thirteenth and fourteenth amend
ments are in the interests of freedom, while the others proposed were addi
tional guarantees for slavery. Accordingly, Mr. Pendleton particularizes his
objections to the amendments. He says in his speech delivered at Bangor,
Maine, on the igth of August, in the course of his enumeration of the
offenses of the Radicals : ' Twice since the close of the war they have
used all the power which the possession of the government, both State and
Federal, has given them, to amend the Constitution, and in each case the
amendment has been in derogation of the substantial, important, recognized
rights of the States. By the first of these amendments the power of the
State over slavery within its limits was abolished. By the second, citizen
ship is dependent upon the will not of the State, but of Congress, and the
exclusion of negroes from suffrage is punished by loss of representation.'
Who will tell us, in the face of such an avowal as this, that we are dis
cussing dead issues? The great leader of the Democratic party still clings
to slavery, objects to its abolishment, and denounces the Republican party,
because, by an amendment of the Constitution, it has destroyed slavery.
Being opposed to the abolition of slavery, believing with his party, that
those measures by which its abolition was effaced are revolutionary, uncon
stitutional and void, Mr. Pendleton would, of course, if he had his way,
restore it. This amendment, as well as the fourteenth, he pronounces a
' derogation of the substantial, important, recognized rights of the states.'
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 868. 193
This is simply declaring those amendments void. The freedom of the slave
stands or falls with the amendment. Mr. Pendleton insists that they shall
fall together ; that the thirteenth amendment shall fall because it gave
freedom to the slave. He would also deprive the freedman of his newly
acquired citizenship, would maintain the old basis of representation, would,
in short, undo all that has been done and bring us back to the halcyon
days of harmony under Pierce and Buchanan.
"Mr. Pendleton in his speech at Portland, delivered on the 23rd day of
August, emphasizes his attack upon the Republican party, and reiterates it
by declaring, as one of the crimes of which the Republican party has been
guilty against the South, that 'it has destroyed their labor system; it has
converted three million of industrious negroes into very bad politicians.' The
labor system to which Mr. Pendleton alludes, is the institution of slavery.
One of the peculiarities of the system was that it was all work and no pay.
Mr. Pendleton complains that this system has been abolished, hopes for its
return, and, to bring his hopes to fruition, demands that the Republican
shall be driven from power. He might as w ell attempt to set time back, to
roll ' the tides back upon the sea as they flow upon the land. But the
exhibition of such an intense Bourbonism as this may well make us despair
of ever having any new issues with the Democratic party. Mr. Pendleton
is kind enough to furnish us the reason why he should not give political
power to the negro. In his speech at Portland, he said, in speaking of the
negro : ' I would not admit him to political power because I believe he is
of a different race from ourselves. I am in favor of maintaining this a
white man's government.' A discussion of such a topic as the origin of our
species, the diversity of races, and whether the Almighty made of one flesh
all the nations of the earth, perplexes political controversy. After a long
disputation and controversy on the question, ' In what consists personal
identity,' or more specifically, ' What was it that made Peter Peter and not
John and John John and not Peter ; ' the schoolmen at last reached the
very satisfactory conclusion, 'That John's identity consisted in his Johnity
and Peter's identity consisted in his Petricity or Peterness.' Results equally
satisfactory may be anticipated in attempting to determine the measure of
the political rights of a citizen by the race to which he belongs. The vexed
question of races is one which would not be satisfactorily solved at the
ballot-box, and no competent political tribunal at present exists which may
decide to what race the applicant for suffrage belongs. Without going very
deeply into that subject, the Republican party contents itself that all
human beings are entitled to human rights, and that all the citizens of
the republic should stand on a footing of political equality. The ques
tions of intellectual and social equality it leaves to be determined by what
each man may do for himself, believing that every man should have
the largest liberty in doing for himself in the way of social or intellectual
development all that he can do. But it seems that our Democratic
friends propose to determine a citizen's right to vote by physiological,
anatomical, ethnological and purely scientific tests. For this purpose we
may expect the endowment of a university, headed by Mr. Pendleton,
13
194 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
assisted by those able savants, Messrs. Morrissey, Rynders, Dean and
Pomeroy, and before whom the negro's right of suffrage shall be subjected
to the just, but, nevertheless, stern and relentless tests of science. Before
such an able body of professors, I think I see as students, the earnest searchers
after truth from the Sixth Ward in the City of New York, numerously appear
ing, armed with a copy of Cuvier's 'Animal Kingdom' under one arm,
the ' Vestiges of Creation ' under the other, and in their pocket a copy of
the Democratic platform. Upon comparing the astragalus of a negro with
the astragalus of a white man, it may be found that they differ. From
this important fact will be deduced the conclusion that they are of dif
ferent race and denial of political rights to the negro would follow as a
natural consequence, not from prejudice against the negro, but out of
glory to science. What the result might be, if it were found that the
same difference in the astragalus existed between different white men,
I cannot undertake to say ; and the results which might flow from the
adoption of the theory of the growth of human beings from oysters up to
monkeys and through successive stages of development until creation flowered
and blossomed out into the perfect Democrat, are fearful to contemplate.
"Ages of slavery are not likely to develop great intellectual activity, and,
to a certain extent at least, may the negro's want of intelligence be ascribed
to the condition of bondage in which he has been kept. A slave no longer,
the problem is, how he may be made sufficiently intelligent to discharge all
the- duties and exercise all the privileges of a citizen wisely and well. It is
very clear that to limit his opportunities for self-improvement would not
result in a satisfactory solution of this problem. Mr. Pendleton seems to
belong to that class of politicians who are in the habit of laying it down as
a self-evident proposition, that no people ought to be free till they are fit
to use their freedom. ' If men are to wait for liberty until they become
wise and good in slavery, they may indeed wait for ever.' It may be that
there are evils resulting from the newly acquired freedom of the slave. But
as Macaulay has well said, ' There is only one cure for the evils which newly-
acquired freedom produces — and that cure is freedom ! When a prisoner
leaves his cell he cannot bear the light of day; he is unable to discriminate
colors or recognize faces. . But the remedy is not to remand him into his
dungeon, but to accustom him to the rays of the sun. The blaze of truth
and liberty may at first dazzle and bewilder nations which have become
half blind in the house of bondage. But let them gaze on and they will
soon be able to bear it.
"Mr. Pendleton demands that this shall be a white man's government.
Whether he intends to exclude from the privileges of this free government
all men who are not white, he does not clearly set forth. If this demand
means anything however, it must mean that none but white men shall be
permitted to be citizens. For if negroes, under any circumstances, are per
mitted to become citizens, this certainly would not be exclusively a white
man's government. The result of this doctrine clearly would be to deprive
the freedman of his newly-acquired citizenship, and that such is the pur
pose of the Democratic party, appears not only from their platform denoun-
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 868. 1 95
cing the legislation by which that citizenship is declared and secured as
unconstitutional, revolutionary and void, but from the. exposition of that
platform by the leading members of the party, Mr. Pendleton among the
number.
"It is insisted, however, that the questions of citizenship and suffrage
should be left exclusively to the States. Under ordinary circumstances this
would be so. But for the nation to have submitted the absolute dominion
over our friends in the seceding and conquered states to our enemies in
those States, would have been an act of injustice so outrageous and so
gross as justly to have called down upon us the reproaches of every nation
on the face of the globe. In the process of reconstruction the injustice of
submitting to the rebel the decision of the extent of the rights of the
freedman is too obvious to admit of comment. When the Democratic
party insists that the people of the rebellious States shall decide who shall
be citizens and who shall be voters in those States, they do not mean what
they say, for by the people they mean, not the negro, who has achieved
his citizenship by his loyalty, but the rebel, who has forfeited his privileges
by his treason. And hence in the decision of this question the freedman,
who is especially interested, shall have nothing to say, while the rebel shall
have everything to say. If the citizenship of the negro in the rebellious
States, is to be recognized as a matter of fact, it would seem clear that
the enjoyment of the privileges of civilization should be secured and guar
anteed him. If to protect him in the full and complete enjoyment of
those rights the ballot is necessary, I for one would confer it upon him. I
would make the gift no idle one. I would have it real and substantial. I
believe that in the States covered by the reconstruction measures the
ballot is absolutely necessary to protect the negro in his newly acquired
rights, and, believing that, I would give him the ballot, feeling well
assured that he who had sufficient intelligence to throw the weight of his
influence in favor of the nation in its struggle for its existence, and suffi
cient courage and patriotism to peril his life in the nation's defense, would
be quite as likely to use the ballot wisely and well as he who waged for
four years a rebellious war against the nation.
" The denial of the right of Congress to legislate upon these questions
proceeds upon the assumption that the seceding states and the people
thereof lost nothing by their rebellion. Mr. Pendleton in his speech at
Bangor declares, with reference to the seceding States, that their State
governments ' were in full vigor and operation before and during and after
the war.' With reference to the vigor of those State governments before the
war, no question is made. But that they were in full vigor as State govern
ments within the Union during the war we deny. We recognized their vigor
as State governments during the war. They vigorously raised troops and
vigorously carried on war against the nation. They did these things as
State governments outside the Union, and as members of the Southern Con
federacy, and it seems somewhat curious that such exhibitions of vigor which
we finally succeeded in pulling down should be adduced as reasons why we
have no control over them now. Had there been during the war less
196 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
vigor of this kind there would have been less cause of complaint on our
part. Had there been more vigor the nation would have been destroyed.
Had there been no vigor, such as was exhibited by the Confederate State
Governments, there would have been no war. That those State Govern-
me'nts had during the war no vigor within the Union which they were seek
ing to destroy, is a fact which cannot be upset by any amount of plausible
theory. If during that time they were as a matter of fact State govern
ments within the Southern Confederacy, they were not within the
Union. They could not be within both the Confederacy and the Union at
the same time. The task of showing that 'during the rebellion, the South
ern States were not, as a matter of fact, members of the Southern Con
federacy may safely b? left to Democratic orators and statesmen. If they
could have been argued out of the Confederacy and into the Union,
that remedy would certainly have been employed during the war. If it
could have been made efficacious, its cheapness compared with the vast
armies which we were, as we supposed, obliged to employ to effect
that object would certainly have been a great recommendation in its
favor.
" Nearly two hundred years ago the British nation was called upon
to face very much such a theory as the one now insisted upon by Mr.
Pendleton and the Democratic party. King James II. was a model
conservative. His character bears many striking resemblances to that of
Andrew Johnson. It is said of him by an eminent historian, 'The
obstinate and imperious nature of the King gave great advantages to
those who advised him to be firm to yield nothing, and to make him
self feared. One State maxim had taken possession of his small under
standing and was not to be dislodged by reason. His mode of arguing,
if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stub
born persons who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors.
He asserted a proposition ; and as often as wiser people ventured respect
fully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again in exactly the
same words, and conceived that by doing so he at once disposed of all
objections.' By various acts of parliament, penalties had been imposed
and tests applied against particular individuals, depriving them of office,
and James proposed to exercise the dispensing power so as substantially
to annul those acts of Parliament. This he called 'my policy.' Finding
Parliament refractory, he determined to call together a new Parliament,
and in doing so employed precisely the same agencies to secure a Par
liament favorable to his purposes, as were resorted to by Andrew Johnson-
in 1866. Returning officers were appointed, directed to avail themselves
of the slightest pretence to declare the King's friends duly elected.
Every placeman, from the highest to the lowest, was made to under
stand that if he wished to retain his office, he must support the throne
by his vote and interest. A proclamation appeared in the Gazette,
announcing that the King had determined to revive the commissions of
peace and of lieutenancy and to retain in public employment only such
gentlemen as should be disposed to support his policy. The Com-
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 868.
missioners of Custom and Excise were ordered to attend his Majesty at
the Treasury. There he demanded from them a promi.e to support his
policy, and directed them to require a similar promise from all their
subordinates. One Custom house officer notified his submission to the
Royal will by saying that he had fourteen reasons for obeying his
Majesty's commands,— a wife and thirteen young children. But with all
these precautions, James failed, as Andrew failed. The new Parliament
were more stubborn and refractory than the old had been, and finally
James fled the country, took his son with him and went to France. And
there the question arose whether the States were out of the Union. At once
there arose in Great Britain a party who insisted upon the theory that there
could be no vacancy in the throne ; that James not being dead, the throne
was not vacant, and that, accordingly writs must run in his name. Acts
of Parliament must be still called from the years of his reign, but that the
administration must nevertheless be confided to a regent. Macaulay says that
•it seems incredible that any man should really have been imposed upon
by such nonsense. And yet it had great weight with the whole Tory party.
The difficulty was solved by the British people, very much as the loyal
people of the country have answered the Democratic theory. ' We recog
nize,' said the British people ' the general correctness of the theory, as a
legal proposition, that the throne can not be vacant. But whatever the
theory may be, we look at the throne, and see that as a matter of fact, no
one occupies it. It is vacant.' They accordingly declared the fact as they
saw it — that the throne was vacant — and, being vacant, they proceeded to
fill it. And they did fill it in a way which secured constitutional liberty to
the British nation down to this' day. And so the people of this country
recognize the fact that for four years the rebellious States were out of the
Union ; that they did establish and sought to perpetuate an independent
government ; that their places in the Union were vacant ; that their seats
in Congress were vacant. That they had no right thus to rebel we well
knew ; that the right to exercise national authority over them was never
destroyed we also well knew. That their secession did not impair the
rights of the nation over them we perfectly well understood ; but that it
did impair their rights within the nation we believed was equally clear.
Their argument is based upon their own wrong, and they claim that
they lost no political rights by rebellion because they had no right to
rebel.
"The position of the Confederate States during the v/ar was defined to
the entire satisfaction of the loyal people of the country by Mr. Lincoln in
his amnesty proclamation, December 8, 1863. He there declares that by
the rebellion the loyal state governments of several States 'have for along
time been subverted ;' that the national authority has been suspended ; that
we are to reconstruct and re-establish loyal state governments, and that the
concessions demanded by him were in return for pardon and restoration
of forfeited rights. The work of reconstructipn has been based upon this
theory and upon the facts. As a consequence of the rebellion, the nation
al authority over the rebellious States was superseded, to be assumed
198 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
when it achieved the power to do so, the State governments of those
States were subverted, overthrown to be re-established when we had the
physical power to do so. Remembering in the language of Mr. Lincoln
that an, ' attempt to guarantee and protect a revived State government,
constructed in whole or in preponderating part from the very element against
whose hostility and violence it is to be protected, is simply absurd. There
must be a test by which to separate the opposing elements so as to build
only from the sound ; the political rights of the people of those States had
been forfeited,' to be restored only upon such terms as the nation might
see fit to impose.
"Such being the condition of the seceded States and people during the
war, how was any change affected in their condition by the defeat of their
armies ? Our rights over them when their armies surrendered were certainly as
great as when they kept the field against us. Our power over them was greater.
Clearly the Southern Confederacy could achieve no rights which they had
not during the war, merely because their armies had been defeated by ours,
and they were unable further to prosecute the war. The defeat of a rebel
lion cannot enlarge its rights. During the war we had, as against the
South, the rights, to say the least, which any nation would have in waging
war, or which we would have had in waging war against any other nation.
We had the rights of war because we were at war, and when the war
closed, we victorious and the Southern Confederacy conquered, we had the
rights which our position gave to us, namely, the rights of a conqueror,
and they had the rights which their position gave them, namely, the rights
of a conquered people. To what extent we should exercise those rights
was another question. But to say that at the close of a long war the
rights of the conqueror and the conquered are equal is an absurdity and
an impossibility. If it required four years of war, five hundred thousand
lives and the expenditure of three thousand millions of money to conquer
the seceding States down to a condition of equality with us, they must
certainly have been our superiors when the war began. It must be
remembered too, that we conquered not only the armies of the rebellion,
but the entire structure of government, State and national, which rebellion
organized and to maintain which its armies fought. And when the Confed
erate flag went down in final defeat at Appomattox Court-House, the
Southern Confederacy and every State government organized under it, went
down with it. The results of these victories are gathered in the fourteenth
constitutional amendment. We intend they shall remain there.
"It is not strange that the Democratic party, having opposed every
measure resorted to by the administration for the prosecution of the war,
and denounced the Republican party as guilty of gross usurpation of
power in the means which it employed to crush out rebellion, should look
with exceeding disfavor upon the debt which the nation was compelled to
contract in order to furnish for its defense men and munitions of war.
The staple charge made against the Republican party by Democratic
orators is that it has left a legacy of $2,700,000,000, of debt to the people. It
is hardly worth while in discussing the question as to where the responsi-
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 868. 1 99
bility of this great debt properly belongs. If the Democratic party and
the South are responsible for the war, then are they responsible for the
debt, and that they are so responsible, the people of this country have
repeatedly decided and still firmly believe. The debt was created in order
to crush rebellion, and now that the active leaders and fomentors of that
rebellion of the South with their sympathizers at the North, should charge
upon the people whose government they undertook to destroy the responsi
bility of the debt is an exhibition of impudence to which history furnishes
no parallel. They may feel thankful that they are not compelled alone
to bear its burdens. But assume that this debt is to be charged up against
the Republican party, how then would the account stand? In the National
ledger we might find the party charged with twenty-seven hundred millions
of dollars loaned to it. by the people, but we would find it credited if the
accounts were correctly kept, with a nation saved. In whose favor the
balance would be could be quite easily determined ; for to this nation, the
only sanctuary of free government on earth, no value can be set. Its value
is incalculable.
"We propose to pay our national debt in money. Of that debt £356,
000,000 are in promises of the government long since past due, and which
as yet the government has been unable to pay. This debt is owing to the
people, for a loan which at an early stage of the war the government forced
the people to make to it. Every holder of a greenback is a government
creditor, and has a right to demand payment before, the holder of any
bond shall be paid, because the greenback is due and the bond is not. It
is our policy, and it is wise policy, to pay this past due indebtedness at the
earliest possible moment. We all desire a resumption of specie payments
as early as possible, and that, it would seem, is the duty which first
presses upon us. The stability of business, every interest indeed, demands
an early resumption of specie payments, or, in other words, the payment
of the ^356,000,000 of its indebtedness represented by greenbacks. So far
as I have been able to learn from reading its speeches, the Democratic
party also professes to desire that specie payments may be soon resumed.
But the general method which it recommends for the treatment of the
national debt would not only indefinitely postpone specie payments, but
would render it impossible. It is easy to see that if an individual was^
desirous of extricating himself from his indebtedness he would first direct
his attention to the payment of that which was first due, and attend to the
balance of his indebtedness in the order of its maturity. If such a man
were owing $5,000 of indebtedness past due, and which he was still unable
to pay, and 125,000 of indebtedness to mature at some future period, and
bearing interest, he would not be considered a very wise financier if he
were to insist that his paper should all be made due at once in order to
save interest. In other words, a man's ability to pay his debts, is not
advanced by doubling the amount of his present liabilities. In addition to
the greenback debt, the government owes $160,000,000 of indebtedness,
represented by what are known as the 5-20 bonds, bearing interest at six
per cent, and due in about twenty years. This debt the Democratic party
2OO LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
proposes shall be paid in greenbacks and that it shall be immediately paid.
This would of course involve the necessity of the issuance of that amount
of greenbacks in addition to the amount already in circulation. If we are
yet unable to resume specie payments, it is not very dificult to see that
by making our demand debt five times larger than it now is, what is now
difficult would become impossible, and we could expect nothing but an eter
nity of irredeemable and depreciated paper currency. And thus the immed
iate results of the adoption of the Democratic policy would be to eternally
dishonor the payment of the indebtedness owing by the government to the
people. The proposition to pay the 5-20 bonds in greenbacks amounts to
nothing, unless we understand when payment is to be made in that way.
If we await the maturity of these bonds, and greenbacks have, in the mean
time, so appreciated that they are at par with gold, the question as to
whether payment shall be made in gold or greenbacks has not the slightest
consequence, and any human being accountable to his Maker for the proper
use of his time could find no justification in spending any portion of it in
the discussion of such a question. If it is intended, however, that the
debts shall be paid in greenbacks now, inflation is a necessity, for the green
backs can be had in no other way. That such is the intention of the
Democratic party, is clearly shown by the reasons which they urge in sup
port of that scheme. They allege that the people are burdened with taxation,
and that this taxation results from the necessity of paying the interest upon the
public debt, and that by the payment of the principal this burden will be
removed. If they mean what they say, when they assert that their pur
pose is at once to relieve the people from the burdens of taxation, then they
can mean nothing else than that they intend to accomplish that end by an
immediate payment, as they call it, of the National debt in greenbacks. Mr.
Pendleton generally, has the credit of organizing this scheme, and he clearly
fixes the time when he proposes that payment shall be made. In his speech
at Centralia he said, 'I would inflate if we were driven to it, 'just as much
as is necessary to pay these 5-20 bonds in greenbacks. And I say it is
the duty of the government, in one way or another, either out of its sav
ings, out of the destruction of the National Bank system, or out of inflation,
to pay these bonds just as soon as, under the law, the government can
pay them to save the interest.' He distinctly says that he would pay
these bonds 'just as soon as, under the law, the government can pay
them to save the interest.' The government has the right under the
'•law to pay one-third of those bonds now, and accordingly Mr. Pendleton
means that they shall be paid now. It is only by inflation to the amount
of these bonds that they can now be paid, and hence inflation would be
a necessity* But Mr. Pendleton suggests two or three methods, one of which
is payment out of the government savings. But the Democratic party
proposes to raise no more money than is absolutely necessary to pay the
ordinary expenses of government, and under that theory it would have no
savings. These savings whatever they might be, can be produced only by
taxes, and the Democratic party proposes very materially to reduce them.
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 868. 2OI
It charges that the present revenues of the government are largely in
excess of its needs, and proposes to reduce them. In short the plan of
paying the national debt out of our surplus revenues involves the neces
sity of increasing taxation. It is the policy of the Republican party to
diminish it.
"Another scheme suggested by Mr. Pendleton, is the payment of the
national debt out of the destruction of the National Bank system. When
we consider the taxes imposed upon the shares of those banks and the fed
eral taxes which they pay, but about $3,000,000 per year would be saved
by this operation, and whether that would compensate for the panics
created by sudden contraction and calling in of loans, \vhich the destruction
of those banks would involve, is a question about which there may well
be grave doubts. It is not, however, a party issue, and it is enough to
say that the payment of $3,000,000 per year of the national debt would
be a very slow way of extinguishing it, and would hardly be a payment
now, which Mr. Pendleton demands. Thus these two schemes are evidently
impracticable, and so Mr. Pendleton evidently considers them, for he frankly
says that he would inflate if we were driven to it, just as much as is nec
essary to pay those 5-20 bonds in greenbacks.
"We have already seen that his plan involves the practical repudiation
of the .greenbacks, and accordingly the practical repudiation of the bonds.
For the proposition simply amounts to this — a pretended payment by the
government of one debt, by the creation of another debt, which by the very
act of its creation is made worthless. By such an inflation, the government
renders its own promises worthless, compels its creditor to take that promise
which it has of its own act made valueless, and calls that payment. I need
not dwell upon the ingenuity of this proceeding, nor the effect which it must
have upon the future credit of the country. I need not repeat here that
when those bonds were issued, the government through its agents, repre
sented that they were to be paid in coin, and that when the law authoriz
ing the issuance of those bonds was under discussion, every one who had any
thing to say upon the subject, insisted that the fact that they were to be
paid in coin was one of the great reasons recommending them to popular
favor: that the provision requiring the payment of the interest in coin was
placed in the law to guard against any possibility of misconstruction which
might arise from the fact that interest would mature before the resumption
of specie payments, a contingency which no one contemplated with refer
ence to the principal, and, therefore, no such provision was deemed neces
sary as to it.
" Nor need I enlarge upon the calamities which would inevitably follow
such a vast inflation. The whole body of our currency would be rendered
comparatively worthless, gold would be drawn from the country by such a
vast body of irredeemable currency, and values not only unsettled but sub
stantially destroyed.
"This would work not merely a burden upon the interests of labor, but
would be the destruction of those interests— the paralyzation of trade, the
overthrow of commerce, industry palsied, enterprise deadened,— these would
2O2 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
be among the first fruits of the inflation policy, and which would grow
worse as the years rolled on.
"Added to this would be the utter loss of national honor, the complete
destruction of national credit. Thus situated without the ability to borrow a
dollar in money, for any purpose, either to enable us to punish our
enemies or defend ourselves against foreign or domestic foes, the Demo
cratic programme of overthrowing the state governments organized under
the reconstruction measures of Congress, which they denounce as revolu
tionary, unconstitutional and void, could be easily and would be readily
carried into -execution.
"The scheme of taking government bonds is equally wicked, equally
impracticable, and a part of the same- general scheme of running the
national credit.
"That the State cannot tax those bonds every one knows. That Congress
cannot confer the power upon the States to tax them is authoritively settled.
All this Mr. Pendleton has been forced to admit, and yet he thinks that in
some way or other, which he does not attempt to point out, some man with
a ' clear head and an honest purpose' may be able to devise some scheme
by which the law with reference to the taxation of the national securities
may be evaded.
"To retain from the foreign bond-holder a portion of his interest is not
taxation. That is repudiation. The Republican party proposes such a pol
icy as will result in improving the national credit, thereby enabling it to
borrow money at lower rates than it is obliged to pay. This done, the road
out of our difficulties is easy and honorable. Our ability to pay our national
debt is settled. 'Our willingness now alone remains to be decided. That
question decided, as it will be by the election of Grant and Colfax, in the
affirmative, our credit is safe, and the adjustment of our national debt
easy.
" In the presence of such an attack upon the national life and honor,
preserved at so vast a cost, who is there that does not say, in the language
of our great captain, 'Let us have peace', — the peace that comes from good
government, the peace that comes from equality of political privileges, the
peace that follows a vindication of national honor, and the assertion of the
national credit ; the peace which will come when rebellion, in all its shapes,
is conquered and all its heresies extirpated ; the peace which a careful
preservation of the fruits of our great victories will insure ; the peace which
will come when we are secured against future attacks upon the national
life. A peace thus secured is full of glory for the future. Such a peace is
solid and enduring, and its green and sunny slopes stretch out in infinite
distances before us. For such a peace, all generations of time will thank
us. The widowed wife of the soldier will thank us for it : the bereaved
mother whose boy died that he might have such a peace, will thank us
for it, and ringing through the very arches of Heaven, will come the thanks
of the spirits of the slain heroes of the Republic, that we have secured the
peace for which they died."
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 868 2O3
In October Governor Seymour visited Chicago, and addressed
a meeting in the old Court-House square, which was in a few
days afterwards reviewed by Mr. Storrs at Library Hall as
follows :
"About six years ago, I was riding through Greenwood cemetery, and 1
observed a venerable looking person apparently examining a monument
not yet entirely constructed. Being somewhat curious in the matter, I
asked a person in charge of the grounds who that old man was that was
bossing the tombstone. He told me that it was the owner of the tomb
stone, and that he was fixing it up for his own accommodation. It
appeared to me to be a melancholy kind of amusement ; but I was satisfied
last Saturday night that that venerable old gentleman was not the only
man engaged in the same kind of business. [Laughter.] For I saw,
standing on the steps of the north door of the Court-House, surrounded by
his friends, some of whom he had brought with him from the city of New
York, a gentleman observing the preparations for his own funeral, and
with a melancholy kind of jocularity engaging in them. Horatio Seymour
has been here. Horatio Seymour has gone. 'Why should we mourn,
departed friends ?' [Laughter.]
"There are a few peculiarities about his speech, general in their charac
ter, to one or two of which I desire to call your attention. In the first
place, he objects to the manner in which the Republican party has, up to
this time, conducted the canvass. I am not surprised that it is not satis-1
factory to him. Early in the canvass, the Democratic State Central
Committee of Pennsylvania, and the Democratic State Central Committee
of New York, and the Democratic National Executive Committee, and the
great statesman himself, declared that in this fight they were going to assume
the aggressive. In all little arrangements of that kind, however, where
there are two parties to a fight, it becomes important sometimes to consult
the other party. It was a thing which they neglected to do, and not
having consulted the Republican party, the slate was broken early in the
campaign ; and just now, instead of standing upon the aggressive, we find
Horatio Seymour and his friends busily engaged in crawling out from the
fragments of their own already exploded machinery.
" He says, too, that Grant and Colfax are in full retreat. He has
brought them in captives. It is a good deal such a capture as was accom
plished by the hunter on the plains when he was sent out at night to shoot
a buffalo for his friends. He hit the buffalo, and just barely hit him, and
maddened him. The old beast started for the hunter, who was on horse
back, and went vigorously for him. The dust flew in large quantities, and
the hunter made for the camp immediately. They arrived in sight of it,
and he, in order to keep up his reputation for courage, took off his hat and
valiantly swung it, and, hardly able to keep away from the enraged buffalo,
shouted, ' Here we come ! You sent me after a buffalo, and I will bring it
to you alive ! ' [Laughter.]
" There is another peculiarity about this speech. I recollect that when
2O4 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
the great statesman was nominated, he declined three or four times before
they could possibly get him to stand as a candidate ; and now that the
New York World and other leading Democratic papers think that he had
better quit, he seems as resolutely disposed not to quit as he was resolutely
disposed not to run. In that particular he is a good deal like Sam Casey's
calf. Sam said he had to pull his ears off to get him to suck, and then to
pull his tail off to get him to quit. [Laughter.]
"There is another peculiarity about this speech to which I also wish to
direct your attention. He has not said a word about his own platform, and
he thereby admits that it is indefensible. He has not said a word against
our platform, and thereby he admits that it is unassailable. He stands in
the position -of the ox just half jumped over the fence, utterly worthless
either for aggressive or defensive purposes. [Laughter.] He can neither
hook in front nor kick behind.
"There is another lutle peculiarity about this speech. He desires to be
elected President of the United States because he is in favor of widening
the Erie canal. He says he is, and that is one of the reasons which he
adduced to that vast assemblage of people why he ought to be elected
President of the United States. There is another reason which he is kind
enough to furnish. Without saying a single syllable in defence of his own
platform, or a single word in opposition to ours, he says that he ought to
be elected President of the United States, because as President he would be
absolutely helpless and couldn't do anything, and could not carry out the
principles of his own, or of anybody's party. [Applause and laughter.] Another
reason why he ought to be President of the United States is that there has
been a tax on cotton repealed. Another reason is that he desires to see
cheap transportation from the West to the East. Another reason is that
they have not got as much paper currency in Illinois as they have got in
Massachusetts. No\v, that last thing is the only proposition that I have
discovered in his speech about which there could be any argument or any
action taken, and the only action that could be taken, so far as I can see,
would be this, — that Horatio Seymour, if he had the power in his hands,
would have Congress declare that the citizens of Illinois have just as much
money as the citizens of Massachusetts, however the fact might be.
[Laughter.] I think a solemn series of resolutions upon that subject would
not very seriously alter the exact condition of affairs.
" When we come to look at the speech seriously, it does seem to me the
most remarkable one ever uttered by any man on the eve of a Presidential
contest, and one in which he is a candidate for the highest office in the gift
of the people. Not one single issue presented to the people, on which they
are called upon to act in the pending election, did Horatio Seymour see
fit to discuss. Not one single proposition did he argue on that night,
upon which legislative action could be taken. He found fault with
Mr. Colfax because he had discussed the past history of the Republican
party, and then, himself, immediately proceeded to say that all the troubles
under which the country was at present laboring resulted from the fact
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 868. 2O5
that we had not, immediately at the close of the war, treated our
Southern brethren with sufficient magnanimity. He possesses that balmy
and juicy kind of magnanimity which would first kick a robber out of
your house, and then, in a second afterwards, elevate him to the head
of your table, in order that there might be thirty-six stars on the flag
and a magic circle in every family, and a certified copy of the Consti
tution at every railroad crossing.
"My fellow citizens, it is too late to discuss the issues of this campaign
now. The people of the United States have settled those issues. The peo
ple of this country have decided that the great party which eight years ago
rescued the Territories from the grasp of slavery, and dedicated them to
freedom, — that great party which carried the nation safely through the per
ils and triumphs of a four years' war, — that great party which elevated four
millions of chattelhood into the clear, pure air of -American citizenship, —
that great party which proposes to save the honor and integrity of the nation,
as it has saved its existence, — shall succeed in this election as it has suc
ceeded in the past, and that its success shall bring peace, final, conclusive,
and permanent, to the country. It is that cause in which we are engaged,
and we have nothing to do now, in view of the magnificent result of the
October elections, but for our great Captain, — the great Captain of the age,
— to order the whole line to advance. They are advancing. They are
keeping step to the music of the Union, and the glory of their triumphs is
already reddening the whole sky, and lighting up the whole heavens with
the intensity of its brilliancy and its glory. There is no doubt about our
success at this election, and in any future elections, so long as the great
party to which we belong is true to the great principles which it has advo
cated in the past, and which it advocates to-day. [Applause.]"
The review of Mr. Seymour's record, which so pleased the
staunch Republicans of Maine, was repeated by Mr. Storrs in
Chicago in a speech of which the* Tribune gives the following
report :
"Horatio Seymour is the nominee, by the Democratic party, for the office
of President of the United States. He is a fit candidate for such a plat
form. We all know him. We knew him during the war as the most bit
ter, the most dangerous enemy the people had.
"Immediately upon the election of Mr. Lincoln, and before his inaugura
tion, several Southern States already having seceded, forts having been
plundered and national property stolen, Horatio Seymour, speaking for the
Democratic party, in the City of Albany, denied the right of the government
to coerce those States in the obedience to the laws, and declared the coer
cion was no less revolutionary than secession. Had this theory been adopted,
secession would have been an accomplished success, and the dissolution of
the Union, upon the inauguration of Mr. Lincoln, an accomplished fact.
The people thought differently, and rallying with an enthusiasm and unan
imity unparalleled to the support of the national authority, and the national
integrity, responded at once to the call made upon them by Mr. Lincoln
2O6 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
for 75,000 troops. This call received from Horatio Seymour no support,
and, in the midst of the great excitement of that time, he abandoned his
own State, fled from the quiet retiracy of his native city, in order to
escape the falling fragments of his own exploded machinery, [applause
and laughter] and for the first months of the great rebellion hid him
self among the forests and trout brooks of the State of Wisconsin, where
the din of the approaching conflict might not disturb his quiet or ruffle
his composure. From the quiet loop-holes of his safe retreat, he coldly
watched the early efforts of a great people to save themselves. No word
of encouragement came from him. But he watched and "waited and
balanced and teetered until he discovered, in the defeat of our army at
Bull Run, a Democratic victory; suddenly thereafter, by some subterran
ean route, lie hied himself home, and addressing the Democracy at
Albany, declared that if the war w^as waged for the purpose of crush
ing the institution of slavery, the South had a right to secede.
" During the time which intervened between the disaster at Bull Run and
his election as Governor of the State of New York, Horatio Seymour made
no sign. Hundreds and thousands of the loyal citizens of that State being
in the army, a Democratic majority was thereby secured, and Horatio
Seymour was elected.
" His first public address was the one delivered by him at the Academy
of Music on the 4th day of July, 1863. You recollect and I recollect — we
all recollect — what a day that was ! Lee was in Pennsylvania. Day by
day, and hour by hour, he had been driving the army of the Union before
him. That day was the gloomiest of our history. The history of the world
has never recorded such a day. We all trembled that day, fearing that
our free institutions and the nation itself were to sink beneath the blows of
rebel adversary. On such a day, when the hearts of good men all over the
land sank within them; when the nation seemed to be upon the very brink
of a precipice from which there was no power to relieve it, this man, the
executive head of the greatest State in the nation, addressed the people in
words carrying no comfort, furnishing no sympathy, holding forth no hope.
He opened a dreary speech of two hours in length by tauntingly inquiring,
where are the victories you promised us ?
"Even before the speech was ended, across prairie and over mountain,
over river and plain, came the answer. The lightning flashed it even as
upon the battle-field the intelligence had been carried by the roar and
thunder of the conflict : Here Horatio Seymour, are the victories that we
promised you ; here are forty thousand prisoners captured at Vicksburg ;
here is Vicksburg itself; the free navigation of the Mississippi to the Gulf;
and the Confederacy rent in twain. And, from the red field of Gettysburg
came the answer: Here are your promised victories — here is Lee's army
defeated and a nation saved. But still no word of encouragement had he
for the great loyal people who were looking to him for comfort that day.
There was no word of denunciation for a rebellion utterly causeless and
infinitely wicked. He said to them, in the Jeremiah style, 'Four years ago
we warned you against sectional differences, but our warning was unheeded.
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 868. 2O/
"Who are 'we?' Lee, Vallandigham, Rynders, John Morissey, Henry
Clay Dean, Brick Pomeroy and Seymour— are we. Who are ' you ' whom
he thus addressed? You are the loyal people of the country. 'We warned
you of the dangers of sectional strife, but you did not heed our warning.
We warned you not to underrate the power of the adversary.' And yet
every effort we made to raise men or money to overcome the adversary
encountered the violent opposition of the Democratic party, Horatio Sey
mour among the number. ' Now,' he said, ' we come to you with another
warning. WTe stand to-day, amid new made graves, in a land filled with
mourning upon a soil saturated with the blood of the fiercest conflict of
which history gives an account.'
"Is that the way that gallant Dick Oglesby would have talked? Is that
the way Yates would have talked ? He might have said to those people that
we stand to-day amid new-made graves, but they were the graves of the
slaughtered heroes of the Republic. He might have said that we stood
in a land filled with mourning ; he would have added that it was mourning
for those who had died in defense of the Republic. True we stood
upon a soil saturated with blood ; but he should have said that that
blood was shed in the conflict waged that the nation might live. The
enemy was thundering at our very gates. He might have said to those
people, in the language of old Demosthenes, ' Let us take up arms against
Philip — let us march against him.' The graves of which he spoke were
the graves of our own sons, whose lives had been freely offered in the
holiest cause which ever lifted up the human heart or nerved the human
arm to action. A patriotic governor would have said, ' by the God that reigns
above us ; by the spirits of the slain calling to us from heaven ; by all we
are and hope to be, see to it that their memories shall be vindicated, and
that the hearts of the mourners shall be comforted.' True it is the soil is
saturated with blood, but he would say it is the blood of the best born of
the nation shed to save the nation. See to it that the blood thus shed,
shall be like the fabled dragon teeth which being sown up and down the
earth, sprung up armed men ; that it shall blossom into a glorious fruitage,
the penetrating perfume of which shall float all around the globe and
intoxicate every other nation with the hope of liberty. No such word came
from Horatio Seymour that day, but thus would a patriot governor have
spoken.
" Finally this great executive officer proposed a remedy for all the
evils which afflicted the people and which he had elaborately portrayed.
At the close of that speech, while Lee was yet in Pennsylvania, and as
he supposed, thundering at the very gates of the Capital, threatening,
at one and the same time, Harrisburg, Philadelphia, New York and
Washington, this great Democratic statesman recommends a method by
which he may be driven away, his army vanquished, by which Bragg
and Pemberton may be driven out of Vicksburg ; by which the nation
in that awful emergency might be saved. ' If you would,' he said.
' save your country and your liberties, begin right.' \Ve would suppose
that a good place to begin, the problem being the expulsion of Lee's
2O8 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
army from Pennsylvania, would be in the field, for, at the time, it was
from Lee's army that our country and its liberties were to be saved.
Does he recommend us to begin at the recruiting station? No. On the
field? No. Yet those were the places where, to ordinary minds, it
would seem eminently proper to begin. Yet this governor recommends
no such place. He says ' begin at the hearthstones ; begin,' he says, ' in
your family circle.' This was a purely domestic recipe. It had no taint
or smell of war about it. It was purely culinary. I suppose, acting
under such advice, every Democratic bachelor at once procured a portable
hearthstone in order that he might have a place to begin at when he desired
to save the Union. I think I see the patriotic Democrats, who were listen
ing to their model governor, charmed with the easy method which he
recommended for the salvation of the country and its liberties, hieing them
selves to their respective homes, in order to put into immediate operation
the prescription which the big medicine man of their party had just fur
nished them. They reached home, and they say ; ' my dear wife ; my much
loved of daughters ; my highly respected mother-in-law, I am about to
save the country and its liberties. I desire, because the governor has
instructed us so, to begin in my family. Please make a ring.' And stand
ing himself loftily, and with the intense consciousness of an exalted patriot
ism, within that Democratic circle, in the sweet privacy and sacred retiracy
of his domestic life, he says 'we will now proceed to save the Union, to
drive Lee from Pennsylvania, to secure the capture of Vicksburg, and the
downfall of the Southern Confederacy after the most approved Constitutional
Seymour fashion. 'Therefore,' he says, 'my dear wife, my much loved
daughter, my highly respected mother-in-law, to follow this prescription liter
ally, we must in the language of our governor, declare that our privileges
shall be sacred, and having once proclaimed our own rights, take care that
we do not invade those of our neighbors. Therefore, be it resolved, I. That
nobody ought to impose upon us. 2nd. That we will impose upon nobody
else. The scheme then is completed. Under the violence of this powerful
incantation coming from the great head magician of the party, no sooner
does Lee's army hear of the attack, which is thus made upon them at the
hearthstones and in Democratic family circles, than, palsied with fear
and frantic with fright, they drop their muskets and flee at once.
Under the weird and mysterious and magical operation of Horatio Sey-
mours's remedy, Pennsylvania is safe, Vicksburg is surrendered ; the Con
federacy falls to pieces ; the flag of the Union streams from every Southern
fort and citadel, the rebellion is crushed. Glory to science. The nation is
triumphant, and Horatio Seymour is its savior. It is impossible to treat
such a proposition as Horatio Seymour that day made, with seriousness. In
the presence of such a calamity as he supposed then threatened the
national life, concluding a long and malignant speech with a mere recom
mendation for household and family circle exertions, was as absurd as it
was wicked ; was as wicked as it was utterly unstatesmanlike ; was as
unstatesmanlike as it was cold, bloodless and unavailing.
"But let us follow him still further. After recommending this method of
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 868.
saving our country, our armies having been depleted at Vicksburg and at
Gettysburg, and the rebellion having been put fairly upon ^ts downfall
career, it became necessary, to secure the full benefits of these great
triumphs, to fill our depleted armies, and this could only be accomplished
by drafting men in to the service of the government. For that- purpose
Congress passed what is called the Conscription law, which at once Horatio
Seymour and his Democratic sympathizers denounced as revolutionary,
unconstitutional and void. Many of those to whom this language was
employed believed it. They thought that if the law were void they
could not be compelled to obey it ; that it was wrong to enforce it.
Accordingly in the City of New York, they resisted the enforcement of
this law, destroying the offices where the drafts were to take place, and
presently extended their acts of violence and bloodshed all over the city,
directing them particularly against those who were supposed to sympathize
with the war and against the negro, who, they thought, was in some way
or other, accountable for it. And so they burned orphan asylums, and
murdered innocent men, women and children.
"Finally the governor was called upon to quiet this mob, which his own
denunciations of the unconstitutionality of the law had called into being.
He was fished up from the sands of New Jersey, brought to New York,
carried tenderly to the City Hall, gently placed upon the steps, and there
he addressed the men engaged in this bloody riot, to whose garments still
clung the smoke of burning asylums, and whose hands were yet red with
the blood of their murdered victims, as his friends ! I care not so much,
nor do I deem it so important, that he addressed these ruffians as his
friends. That was bad enough, but what followed was infinitely worse.
He was the executive head of that great State. It was his duty to see that
the laws were enforced, that offenders against the law were brought to
punishment, and that further offenses against the law should cease. He
knew that crowd whom he was addressing had been guilty of every crime
denounced by any law, human or divine. Observe that he does not
denounce them for the crimes which they had already committed ; he finds
no fault with them for their violation of the law, nor does he ask them to
cease violating it in the future; he didn't tell them that they must stop
violating the law ; but he tells them that the law shall stop. ' I have,' he
says, 'sent my Adjutant General to Washington, to confer with the authori
ties there, and to have this draft suspended and dropped.' This man who
thus faltered, and parleyed with, and cringed to, a gang of incendiaries and
plunderers, proposes to assume the executive power of the nation and see
that its laws are faithfully executed.
"This speech produced its legitimate effect. He asked the mob to await
the return of his Adjutant General, assured that they need entertain no
more fears xvith reference to the draft. The crowd left the august presence
of the Governor. It was too much to ask that these constitutional, law-
abiding, order-loving, God-fearing friends of Horatio Seymour should
remain unemployed while they were waiting for the return of the afore
said adjutant, for we know that ' Satan finds some mischief still for idle
2IO LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
hands to do.' Accordingly, in order to occupy themselves busily, they
surrounded a negro, and him they captured, him they courageously hung to
a lamp-post and him they burned to death. Brave friends of Horatio
Seymour! Patriotic followers of the truth as it was in their Governor! Fif
teen or twenty thousand of them violently overcame one unarmed negro,
hung him and burned him to death ! The negro finally burned up, these
constitution-loving citizens, who were all opposed to war and in favor -of
peace, who had been for two years largely engaged in the olive-branch
business, many of whom made night hideous by their shouts at the Demo
cratic Convention in 1864, in this city, surrounded some negro women and
children, and bravely captured and killed them. This done, they burned
other asylums and hospitals. That ended, they finally chased a Union sol
dier, Colonel O' Brien — who would have been a member of the Irish Repub
lican Club if he were living to-day — they chased him, fifteen or twenty thous
and of them, finally overtook him in front of his own house, and there beat
him to death under circumstances of shocking barbarity. Oh, how we all
wished in those days that Logan, at the head of four regiments of Illinois
troops, might have had the handling of that mob. They would have made
the fur fly from Horatio Seymour's friends and largely have reduced the
Democratic vote. The Adjutant General did not come. Veteran regiments
from the army of the Potomac did come. They finally succeeded in crush
ing Horatio Seymour's rebellion in the City of New York, and returning
again to the army of- the Potomac, under the leadership of Grant, finally
succeeded, about two years afterwards, in crushing its twin rebellion — the
Rebellion of Jeff Davis.
"About two weeks after this achievement of Horatio Seymour's friends,
he addressed an impudent letter to Mr. Lincoln, demanding that the draft
should be suspended until the constitutionality of the law should be tested
by the courts. There was this peculiarity about Abraham Lincoln's corres
pondence, that during all the war, whenever some gentleman like Seymour,
by letter, demanded something with reference to the policy of the adminis
tration, and Abraham Lincoln answered it, that his answer closed the
correspondence. To this brutal riot Horatio Seymour, in that letter appealed,
using it as a threat to intimidate the President into concession to his
demand. He said to him at the close of the letter, 'You can scan the
immediate future as well as I. The temper of the people to-day you can
readily learn.' The temper to which he referred was that which, his 'friends'
had just been exhibiting, and • to quiet which regiments of veterans were
necessarily withdrawn from the front and sent to the city of New York.
Just how practical a proposition this was of Horatio Seymour's is pretty
clearly seen when we consider how long a time would have been consumed
in trying his law suit. A suit to test the question would probably have been
commenced before Judge McCunn, a good Democrat ; who had already
decided the law to be unconstitutional. From him sometime in September,
1864, the case would have been transferred to the United States Court. An
argument would be had there before Judge Betts, sometime in December,
1863. A reargument before Judge Nelson, as the Circuit Judge, sometime
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 868. 211
during the following year. An appeal from the opinion of Judge Nelson,
whatever that decision might have been, to the Supreme Court of the
United States, at Washington sitting in December, 1864. and if everything
moved fortunately, and the case was reached upon the docket, a decision
sometime in the Spring of 1865, at which time no accessions having been
made to our army, it having been suffered to dwindle away, the rebels not
feeling inclined to wait until our law suit should be decided, "Wade Hamp
ton, Fort Pillow Forest, General Lee, and other good Southern Democrats
would have been in Washington anticipating the decision. As I have
said, Mr. Lincoln answered this letter that the demand was utterly impract
icable, and that a compliance with it would be utterly destructive of the
national cause, as he knew and everybody knew. Mr. Lincoln with that
great good sense and exalted patriotism which characterized every step of
his official career, thus answered Horatio Seymour :
" ' I do not object to abide a decision of the United States Supreme Court,
or of the Judges thereof, on the constitutionality of the draft law. In fact,
I should be willing to facilitate the obtaining of it. But I cannot consent
to lose the time while it is being obtained. We are contending with an
enemy who, as I understand, drives every able-bodied man he can reach
into his ranks very much as a butcher drives bullocks into a slaughter pen.
No time is wasted, no argument is used. This produces an army which
will soon turn upon our own victorious soldiers already in the field, if they
shall not be sustained by recruits as they should be. It produces an army
with a rapidity not to be matched on our side, if we first wait time to
re-experiment with the volunteer system already deemed by Congress, and
palpably in fact, so far exhausted as to be inadequate, and then more time
to obtain a court decision as to whether a law is constitutional which
requires a part of those not now engaged in the service, to go to the aid
of those already kin it ; and still more time to determine with certainty that
we get those who are to go in the precisely legal proportion to those who
are not to go. My purpose is to be in my action just and constitutional,
and yet practical in performing the important duty with which I am charged,
of maintaining the unity and free principles of our common country.' So
Father Abraham was entirely willing that Governor Seymour should have a
law suit too, if he wanted it, and was entirely willing to facilitate the trial
or the decision, but he was not willing that the draft should stop. He
preferred that the law suit and the war should run along in parallel lines.
And as it turned out, the war ended before Horatio Seymour's law suit-
could possibly have reached a determination.
" As thoroughly as I dislike the record which Horatio Seymour has made,
as malignant and as dangerous as I deem it to be, as great as I conceive
the punishment for those offences ought to be, yet I could ask that no
severer punishment be visited upon him than that the spirit of those two
letters, taking visible shape, should march down the aisles of history together.
How, as we stood upon some elevated table land, where we could watch
their progress, would, as the distance lengthened out, the spirit of Horatio
Seymour's letter warp, and dwindle, and halt, and wither, while that of our
212 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
grand old patriotic President, growing greater and greater as the years
receded, swelling into loftier and grander proportions as the mist of preju
dice and passion cleared away from it, disclosing in its outlines the perfect
symmetry of patriotic, high-hearted faith in the great cause for which he
died, would challenge the admiration of all the ages, reaching at last the
highest summits of historic renown. We would all find that as we gazed
upon it we stood in the presence of a great character. Before it we would,
with uncovered head reverently bow. We would hail and salute it. Thus
would the muse of history, making up the records of human. achievements,
address it : ' Stand up, Abraham Lincoln, among the greatest and the noblest
and the best of this world's history.' And, looking about, discovering the
halting spirit of Horatio Seymour had, in some mysterious way, corkscrewed
itself into that glorious company where it did not belong, it would address
him, saying : ' Stand down, Horatio Seymour, among the falterers and
sneaks and cowards and doubters, and those who sought to obstruct the
march of a great nation, as it was resolutely treading the road which led to
the clear atmospheres of freedom.'
" This shall be our verdict : ' Following in the pathway where Abraham
Lincoln has gone before, we are resolved that the standard which he held
shall be lowered never an inch. That the great cause for which he gave his
life shall suffer no dishonor, and that the spirit of American institutions
shall ere long sit enthroned upon the highest summits of earthly renown and
heroic achievements, robed in the radiant garments of a universal freedom,
and with its bright star glittering full and broad and clear upon its forehead.' "
CHAPTER XII,
AN ESTABLISHED REPUTATION.
A FAMOUS INSURANCE CASE — ITS HISTORY — A NEW WAY TO LOOK AT COR
PORATIONS AND INDIVIDUALS— A MASTERLY ARGUMENT— CAPTURING THE
COURT BUT NOT THE JURY — STANDING AS AN INSURANCE LAWYER.
ABOUT this time, Mr. Storrs achieved newspaper attention all
over the land by the learned ability* with which he con
ducted the trial of an issue very different in kind from any in
which he had previously been interested. It was a case which
a prominent insurance organ, the Chronicle, predicted wras
"destined to become famous in the annals of insurance." The
material facts entitled to a permanent record were as follows :
Weide Brothers were wholesale grocers in St. Paul, Minnesota,
on and previous to February 22, 1867. The morning of that
day, both store and goods went up in smoke and the lightnings
lost no time in announcing " a total loss " to various insurance
companies. The insurance carried was $54,000 on the stock, and
the assured set up a loss of $70,600. Immediately after the loss,
J. J. Berne, then of the Phoenix and S. French, of the City Fire
Insurance Company, began an investigation as to the magnitude
and good faith of the claim. The assured offered the adjusters
all the data attainable ; but, as was said at the time, that which
was offered " proved quite as effective in disproving the whole
claim, as in making it satisfactory or plausible." It was found
from memoranda, on fly-leaf of rescued ledger, that the stock on
hand, in February, 1865, was $47,000 and over. By getting
results of the inventories, bill of purchases since, of sales, etc.,
an approximation could be reached as to the goods on hand at
the time of the disaster ; but most of the books of the concern
213
214 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
were missing, and the ledger, one journal, and miscellaneous
pieces of accounts, were sadly inadequate to satisfy the investiga
tor. Very often, merchandise debts had become credits, and
profit and loss were so commingled as to be undistinguishable.
Adjuster Berne grew dazed as he proceeded. Investigations pro
duced other facts. The trade of the firm was claimed to be about
$150,000 per annum, and they set forth a stock in store in Febru
ary, when uniformly low, of fifty per cent, of the year's sales.
This seemed improbable, and the adjusters inquired among firms
in the same business at St. Paul : " What relation does your
stock, in February or March, bear to your yearly sales?" The
answer came : " Usually about one-sixth or one-seventh of our
sales." One firm, whose sales were four times as large as the
Weides', reported that in February, 1867, it had only about the
same amount of goods on hand as were claimed to have been lost.
Others in the same trade, familiar with Weides' stock, estimated
it as below $30,009 in value immediately preceeding the fire.
However, there was another and most damaging discovery. In
February, 1865, the city assessments were finally corrected and
made ready for collection. The Weides complained of the esti
mate put upon their stock, and, by exhibition of inventories, mer
chandise account, and other statements, induced the tax commis
sioners to reduce it to $25,000. But the ledger fly-leaf had
" stock," same date, $47,000! Here was a discrepancy of $22,000,
which seemed to be worth correcting, and so it was " adjusted "
accordingly. Other errors were found, until the $70,000 claim
was reduced to an apparent loss of $29,261.30 only. The
adjusters then offered a settlement on the basis obtained ; it was
accepted, and the policies of the two named companies were
paid at a fraction less than 54 per cent, of the original claim.
Policies yet remained unsettled to the amount of $46,000.
Representatives of the Home Company of New York, of the
Hartford, and others, visiting the claimants the week after this
settlement, could not obtain any demand from the Weide's less
than that based on a loss of more than $70,000. In reply to an
inquiry, the Weides swore that the Phoenix and City Fire Com
panies had settled on that basis, and they were unwilling to accept
a less sum from the other companies interested. Accordingly,
suits occurred, and, on trial, the United States Circuit Court ruled
AN ESTABLISHED REPUTATION. 21$
out all testimony as to stocks of other merchants in same place
and trade, and, in effect, the admissions of assured as to magni
tude of loss in settlements with other companies ; and, under
instructions, the jury found a verdict for the plaintiffs for the
whole sum claimed. An appeal was taken, and the case was sent
back for a new trial, — the rejected testimony being deemed per
tinent, important and admissible. The second trial came on
before the excellent Judge Dillon and a jury on the 24th day of
June, 1868, and continued three days.
Daniel Webster once said, " the greater the danger of losing
a cause, the greater the desire for a noted lawyer," and to
Brougham is attributed the mot, " Bad cause, then a good
lawyer ; vice versa — reverse vice." Mr. Storrs had a wonderful
number of re-trials and of once-heard causes, inaugurated by other
talent, to bring to a conclusion. He conducted the insurance
defense in the second trial. During it, much new testimony went
to the jury, and the city of St. Paul was in a convulsion until
the case ended. Indeed, a journal of the time, wrote :
" \Ve have high authority for saying that the case was tried in the slums
and saloons of the city, and particularly in a certain newspaper office there,
quite as earnestly as in the court room. The paper in question came out,
during the trial, with a flaming editorial, admitting that the Weides had
settled part of their claim at 54 cents on the dollar; but averring that this
settlement was brought about by intimations that the ' Phcenix' and ' City
Fire' were in a failing condition, and that assured thought it better to
accept part, than to incur the hazard of losing all by delay.
"The animus of such a falsehood was manifest enough, and the attention
of the court being called thereto, it was denounced as infamous, and the
parties were warned that any farther attempts in that direction would be
promptly met and rewarded. The modest editor lending himself to this
dirty endeavor, did not dare even to notice the Judge's scathing rebuke in any
succeeding issues of his paper."
All the testimony of the original trial was repeated, and
depositions of the Phoenix and City Fire agents as to previous
settlement, were admitted ; as was, also, the testimony of all the
leading grocerymen of St. Paul as to stocks usually on hand in
February — until, the " mountain of fact " became so monstrously
threatening that the plaintiffs, in desperation, openly threatened
violence on those who had been called to tell " nothing but the
truth " and told it. In addition, and what was noted as a curious
fact in the light of the verdict, J. Weide, being called upon to
2l6 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
rebut some of the unwelcome testimony, was asked to reconcile
the discrepancy between the $47,000 entry on the "fly-leaf" and
the $25,000 assessment the same year, when he very naively
admitted that one of the statements must be false, and that " the
untruth was imposed on the assessor, for the purpose of avoiding
a petty, but proper city tax " while the other entry, by which
he hoped to win $22,000, was "the exact truth!"
The evidence was searchingly reviewed, in able arguments by
counsel for both sides. The discussion by Mr. Storrs was clear
as crystal, powerful, and it would have been unanswerable, or
rather impossible to resist, by any other than a body of men
prejudiced beyond reason and duty. That part of the argument
which embodied permanent sound sense upon the questions under
laying all insurance contracts and insurance cases, and which,
in its style of logic, must interest all classes of thinkers, was as
follows :
"We have repeatedly been reminded, during the progress of this trial, that
the defendants are wealthy and powerful corporations; that the plaintiffs
are private citizens of St. Paul, and the inference seems to be pressed upon
us, that for these reasons, in one way or another, not very clearly explained,
the plaintiffs are entitled to something more than the law and the evidence
in the case would give them.
" Very much has already been said, and much more doubtless will be said,
concerning the dangerous powers which corporations exercise, and the con
clusion seems to be that they are entirely unnecessary, and that some
method should be devised by which they would be wiped out of existence.
" It has probably occurred to you, that whether, on the whole, corporations
are beneficial or injurious, necessary or unnecessary, is rather more a polit
ical than a legal question, which you, as jurors, can, under the issues in this
case, hardly be expected to decide.
" I shall not undertake to defend corporations in all that they have done
in the past, noi in all that they may do hereafter. Yet I cannot shut my
eyes to the fact that, in an age like the one in which we live, in which
commerce is king, for the successful prosecution of those vast enterprises in
the way of material and physical development, of which we are so justly
proud, aggregations of capital are indispensable. The construction of those
great lines of railroad, by means of which nations are benefited and devel
oped, requires the outlay of immense sums of money, for which individual
enterprise would be entirely inadequate. We are living under a new order
of things, and if we are wise, we will adapt ourselves to the situation.
" Millions of value are invested in every variety of business, and it is very
clear that the owners cannot be secured against loss or destruction by fire
or the elements by any other means, than by aggregated capital, in the
AN ESTABLISHED REPUTATION. 2 1/
shape of what are called insurance companies. No man would feel like
assuming the hazards of a large wholesale business here or elsewhere, with
tens and hundreds of thousands of dollars invested in merchandise, if he
were himself compelled to assume the hazards of its destruction by fire.
Without insurance, you would find it difficult to get your grains to market.
No one shipper would assume the hazards of losing fifty thousand bushels
of wheat. To him, such a loss would be destruction ; but where the risk is
divided among a large number of insurance companies, the loss is divided,
and can be borne with comparative ease.
" In our great grain elevators, there are at times stored millions of bushels
of grain, amounting in value to millions of dollars. The warehouseman
could not, if he would, secure the owners of that property against its loss
by fire. But the aggregated capital, represented in insurance companies,
can do it, and does do it, for a very trifling percentage.
" And thus the necessity of insurance companies for safe and successful
prosecution of business, is obvious.
" You cannot overthrow them nor dispense with them, unless you mean to
destroy all business enterprise of whatsoever kind. This, I presume, we
are not yet prepared to do. But if, upon a fair survey of the situation, we
are satisfied that these corporations should be destroyed, the way is open to
accomplish that end. We need no legislation to do this. A general disre
gard by courts and juries of the rights of the companies under their con
tracts will very shortly accomplish such a result. You need but to
encourage the prosecution of fraudulent claims, the violation by the assured
of the conditions of the policy, and there is no insurance company on earth
but would be compelled very soon to succumb. And suppose that,
pursuing that course, 'we, the people' do succeed in overthrowing what
are sometimes called these gigantic corporations?
"\Vould it not be well for us to inquire whom we have benefited, and
whom we have injured ? You may say, that the corporation is injured. But
counsel will loudly tell you that corporations have no souls. Therefore, a
corporation can't feel bad. The men and the women, whose money was
invested in it, may be all injured, and many may be ruined. But we have no
grievances against them, and what do we gain, or what does the public
gain, by injuring or ruining them ?
"All those business interests with which insurance is so intimately inter
woven, must lose heavily. Not a single department of business could be
named, that would not suffer from such a course. No one is benefited. No
interest, public or private, would be in the slightest degree advanced. And it is
very certain that neither public or private morals would be promoted by
the overthrow of insurance corporations, and particularly so when fraud,
false swearing, and the violation of contracts were the means by which such
overthrow was effected.
" Let us not deceive ourselves. So long as a corporation performs all
its legal duties, and faithfully discharges all its legal obligations, we must,
if we intend to administer the law at all, exact from all those who have
218 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
made contracts with them the same measure of good faith. In theory, this
principle would probably be universally recognized, but, in practice, we all
know how often it is violated.
" From the very nature of the business, the contract of insurance is
a peculiar one. It is not like an agreement to give a thousand dollars in
money for a thousand bushels of wheat, or for a thousand days of labor ;
but these plaintiffs ask, from each of the defendants, that, upon the consid
eration of $30.50 to each of them paid, we* each now pay them #5,000.
And this, upon the happening of a certain event, and on certain conditions
we have agreed to do. In the case of an ordinary contract for the purchase
of merchandise, or other property, we would require that the property which
we were to receive should be of a certain quantity and quality, and would
make such conditions a part of the contract ; and no one, I suppose,
would call us very hard-hearted should we insist upon the strict per
formance of those conditions, before being called upon for pay
ment. With how much greater force, then, should an insurance company,
which, in the event of its liability to pay at all, is required to pay out a
very large sum of money for a very small sum received, demand a strict
compliance with every condition of the contract. So far as the risks are
concerned, they are all against the insurer. In this case, had there been
no fire, the plaintiffs would have lost only about #350. But, in the event
of a fire, the companies may be compelled to pay $54,000.
"'These contracts were not agreements to pay $54,000 should the plain
tiffs' stock be destroyed by fire. The companies agreed to pay, under cer
tain conditions, the value of the stock destroyed, not to exceed the sum
named in the policies; and so, if the insurance were for $100,000, but the
actual loss was only $50, that would be all that the companies could be
called upon to pay, because that was all they had agreed to pay.
" Hence, it is very clear that, as the value of the property injured or
destroyed is the measure of liability, the facilities for ascertaining precisely
what that value is would enter very largely into the risk. If the actual
amount of the loss could be with certainty ascertained, and all means for
a false or fraudulent over valuation cut off, the risk would be but compara
tively small. But when there are no means furnished for determining the
actual value of the property, insurance companies would be placed com
pletely at the mercy of any unscrupulous man, and the risks so largely
enchanced that it would be next to impossible to prosecute the business of
insurance at all. The amount of the premium is regulated by the extent
of the risk. If the risk is great, so is the premium, or at least it ought to
be. Counsel will undoubtedly have very much to say concerning the
numerous conditions in policies of insurance, and you will be told that all
those conditions are traps for the unwary. But the companies would be
quite willing to dispense with every condition contained in the policy, pro
vided they were paid for the additional risks which they would thereby
assume.
"These companies would be willing to insure the 'Weides* to-day in the
sum of $50,000, on any stock of goods which they might have, agreeing
AN ESTABLISHED REPUTATION. 2IQ
Absolutely to pay them that amount in the event of the loss of their goods
by fire, and waive every condition of the policy, provided the Weides would
pay the premium we asked. In such a case, the premium would probably
be £50,000, together with a liberal charge for writing the policies. The
risk would then be even, and the trade a fair one.
"Where so much depends upon the facilities for ascertaining the actual
value of the property destroyed, it is but natural that insurance companies
should seek to protect themselves as far as possible against fraud or mistake,
and should require from the assured every facility to enable them to inves
tigate that question thoroughly and satisfactorily.
"To that end, various conditions are annexed to the policy, and made a
part of it. The word defines itself. The company agrees to pay upon cer
tain conditions. If the conditions are not complied with or performed, there
is no agreement to pay.
" To these conditions the assured becomes a party. Whether they are
reasonable or unreasonable, just or unjust, necessary or unnecessary, they
are binding upon the parties, for the plain reason that they have agreed to
be bound by them."
The arguments ended, Judge Dillon impartially charged the
jury. A verdict allowed the claim in full, and interest for about
four years ! The court was righteously incensed at the outrageous
result after such evidence as had been heard, and, turning to the
jury and to the assembled attendants upon the trial, said :
" In this case the jury Jias discharged its duty, and no doubt conscien
tiously, but the court has also a duty equally important. Courts are not
organized to record verdicts which are unsupported by the evidence, and
it is their duty to set all such verdicts aside, and it must be understood that
here are two ordeals to pass in this court. The jury have negatived the charge
of fraud, and with that finding we shall not interfere : but if ever a fact
was proved and demonstrated in a court of justice, it was shown in this
case that the plaintiffs' loss did not exceed $30,000.
"With the views which we entertain of the evidence in this case, we
could not record this verdict without abdicating our functions as a court.
This we are not prepared to do. We shall grant a new trial in this case,
giving the plaintiffs, however, permission to remit the verdicts to the basis
of a total loss of $30,000.
"Judge Miller has repeatedly expressed his regrets that he did not set
aside the verdict in the Underwriter's case — the last one tried. The defence
in this case is stronger even than the one made in that, additional evidence
upon part of the defence having been introduced in this trial."
The terms indicated by Judge Dillon were accepted by the
plaintiffs instanter, and so ended the Weide cases.
The thoroughness, however, with which Mr Storrs had gone
over the entire range of this Weide fraud, and the remarkable
22O LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
expertness with which he had handled abstract and technical
business points received acknowledgment from journals through
out the country, as the evidenees of mental and analytical powers
of an uncommon order. The Spectator said of the case in a long
review : " We candidly think, that his (Mr. Storrs') argument will
secure for itself a lasting place among the causes celebre of
insurance and for its author the highest rank among those mem
bers of his profession to whom the companies are unfortunately
compelled to look for aid against the raids of fraudulent claimants
and the ignorant prejudice of jurymen: . . . The remainder of
the argument is devoted to a masterly analysis of the peculiar
features of this fraud, in the course of which Mr. Storrs evinces
as much familiarity with figures, and their intricacies and manip
ulations, as though he had spent his life at the accountant's desk
. . . We regret that we have not space to reprint the argument
entire; for it is a remarkable vindication of the rights of under
writers, and, as such, should be studied by the members of the
profession." The Insurance Times, in a similar review, said: "The
trial was conducted by Mr. Storrs with consummate ability, which
marks him as one of the ablest insurance lawyers in the West.
To him, the underwriters throughout the country owe a lasting
obligation."
CHAPTER XIII.
POETICAL ORATORY AND COLD REASONING.
WHAT A SOLDIERS' MONUMENT PROCLAIMS — AN INSPIRATION — AN ADDRESS
OF BEAUTY — SANCTITY OF CONTRACTS — FRANCHISE PROPERTY NOT TO BE
TAKEN WITHOUT PROCESS OF LAW — THE STATE OF ILLINOIS AND THE
ILLINOIS CENTRAL — A DISCUSSION BEFORE GOVERNOR PALMER. »
A SIMPLE, yet beautiful, oration was delivered by Mr.
Storrs, in April, 1869, at Rock Island, Illinois, on the
occasion of the dedication of a monument to the Union soldiers
who had fallen in the war — one of the many erected everywhere
throughout the loyal States. The orator of the day was intro
duced, as the unveiling of the shaft of marble was completed
and the national salute of thirty-seven guns ceased, and spoke as
follows :
"It is done. Beautiful in its design, elegant in its proportions, sublime in
its teachings as the sun in its glory of noontide or the stars in the solemn
pomp and majesty of midnight, the soldiers' monument stands completed.
In the presence of this vast concourse of people ; in the shadow of this
eloquent patriotic teacher, which your munificence has reared and which
you have just dedicated to the people of this county on this auspicious
April day, the fourth anniversary of the surrender of Lee's army at Appo-
mattox Court House ; impressed with reverential feeling for the memory of
those departed heroes in whose honor this monument was erected, I gaze
upon it, I hail and salute it. The significance of this ceremonial does
not come altogether nor chiefly from the fact that we commemorate the
patriotic virtues of those whose names are inscribed on the base of this
monument ; nor is it for that alone that the monument is dedicated. As
noble as were their lives, as glorious as were their deaths ; the great cause
for which they sacrificed their lives and willingly met death, is nobler and
more glorious still, for a great cause ennobles him who espouses it. The
commonest farmer boy who braved the perils of battle and willingly met
221
222 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
death that this nation might live, penetrated by the influences and spirit of
the nation for which he died, has changed and, I might almost say, lifted
himself above all that he or we would ever have dreamed of the capacities
of his nature. For it is wonderful how, when once inspired by the feeling
of genuine patriotic devotion, the ordinary nature becomes transformed into
something infinitely nobler and higher, and is lifted to a higher plane than
we could ever have conceived he could possibly obtain. Inspired by such
emotions — possessed by them, indeed — the farmer boy, who before had but
a dim conception of what his country really was, the moment that he saw
it in danger willingly cast behind him friends, home, all lesser ambitions,
and gave his life that his country might know no dishonor. He then saw
his country, an unseen mistress before, differently than he had ever before
perceived it. He saw that his country was not merely its physical extent ;
was not alone its prairies, its mountains, its rivers and its valleys ; was not
merely its physical successes and achievements, however noble they might
be ; it was rather the grand idea upon which his nation was builded. He
saw that that nation was the incarnation of a spirit of self-government ; that
it was the sacred repository of human equality and freedom. He saw, too,
that if that nation died after having gone thus far in realizing the success
of the magnificent experiment of self-government on this continent, the
ideas themselves died out from among the nations, and the clock of human
advancement was set back for centuries of time. To these ideas, thus vital
to the interests of humanity everywhere and for all ages to come, as well
to their heroic defenders from Rock Island county, who died that they
might be maintained, do we dedicate this monument. It is to these ideas,
thus rescued from the profanation of rebel hands, that our nation owes all
the glory of its past and all the hope of its future. To these ideas do we
not only dedicate the monument but ourselves. The capacity of man for
self-government as a political principle found its first distinct, emphatic,
practical enunciation on this continent. Upon it the structure of our gov
ernment is rested. Upon a faithful adherence to it depends the perman
ency of that structure. It is this principle which crystallized, within the
limit of this republic, about itself all peoples and all tongues. It has
brought to these fruitful fields earnest men and earnest women from every
quarter of the globe, who, with high purpose and strong hands, have,
within one generation of time, carved out a magnificent empire, the glorious
future of which no imagination dare essay to portray. It has brought us
here from the fields of Lexington and Concord, where the first shot of the
farmer-soldier was fired in the revolution — a shot that was heard all round
the globe. We are here from the shadows of the old South Church, bap
tized as it has been in the waters of a religious faith. We are here from
the old Empire State, with its collossal commerce so extended that its sails
whiten every sea and its fibres are interlaced with the 'fate of kingdoms.
We are here from the home, for generations, of the poet, the philosopher
and the scholar. From the fields of Germany, with whose sons patriotic
devotion is an instinct, and the promise of united Germany follows closely
POETICAL ORATORY AND COLD REASONING. 223
upon the successful achievement here of a united republic. Coming hither
no question is asked from whence we come nor how much of wealth we
bring. The question is: What can you do? and How well can you do it?
The injunction then is — Do if, and the best you can. And thus with this
unrestricted freedom of self-development a great nation has been made,
because the men and women of that nation have made themselves great.
That this freedom of self-development and improvement should continue in
the future as it had obtained in the past, our soldiers maintained it in the
field — they dedicated their lives to it. To that for which they dedicated
their lives we dedicate this monument and ourselves. Our duties are not
ended, our responsibilities are not discharged. The debt we owe the patri
otic dead is not paid merely when this imposing ceremonial shall have
passed away. The rebellion which our armies crushed was the outgro.wth
of political heresies, directly at war with the principles upon which our
nation rested. This war had raged long before it flamed out into actual
battle. It raged for years in the forum, upon the stump, through the press
and in legislative halls. Meeting with no final success in either of these
fields of warfare, the enemies of the nation transferred it to the field.
" The wager of battle is the final test. Its results admit of no revisions.
From it there is no appeal. They that take the sword shall perish by the
sword. And when the rebellion, four years ago to-day, sunk into the eternal
night of utter defeat, not only were its armies beaten but the political her
esies that those armies fought to maintain were beaten as well.
" The rebellion was a protest against the equality of manhood. War, in
its stern results, has silenced that protest. The rebellion asserted the right-
fulness of slavery and its continued existence as a political power. The
victory of Grant at Appomattox silenced that assertion. The rebellion denied
the universal dignity of labor ; the downfall of its armies, the overthrow of
its military power, met that denial with the triumph of an affirmative.
" It is the duty of us who are living, to see to it that there be no step
taken backwards ; that the standard which our conquering legion held and
carried unscathed through the tremendous perils of the wickedest rebellion
that the world has ever seen be lowered never an inch. True to this extent
to ourselves, we will thus most highly honor the departed dead, whose loss
we this day mourn. That we shall thus be true, this beautiful monument,
and the statue of the Union soldier looking solemnly upon us will ever
adjure us. Thus true to our duty, the mother whose boy died in this great
cause and whose name is inscribed upon this marble, may ever look upon
it and take comfort from it. The widow, whose husband died that the
nation might live, may point her orphan boy to his father's name, and he
will draw fresh supplies of patriotic inspiration from it. Old age and lisping
childhood may visit it, and be inspired by its solemn teaching. And there,
in the eternal marble, shall those names remain, growing brighter and
brighter as the years recede. The future historian shall say of them, they
fought bravely, they fell gloriously. They found four millions of human
beings slaves — they made them freemen. They lifted four millions of
224 LIFE OF EMERY A- STORRS.
human beings from the barbarism of human chattelhood into the clear, pure
air of American citizenship.
" And when the great nation for which they died shall finally have achieved
its full mission, and there shall be no spot upon the face of the globe
where the equality of man is not recognized, the names of these men
inscribed upon the brightest rolls of this world's history shall challenge the
admiration of all the ages. That this may be so, we devoutly pray. That
it shall be so, we pledge ourselves.
" One word more. The credit of erecting this monument is not due alone
to the men of Rock Island. As during the entire period of the war, the
kindly charities and gentle ministrations of woman were everywhere found,
so in this undertaking has she contributed her part.
" What the women of America accomplished during the war has passed
into history — it has challenged the admiration of the world. From their
achievements I may well say, that ' all that the poet has ever sung, or the
historian written in favor of women, might well be applied to the women
of America.' God bless the women of America."
In marked contrast, but to the lover of cold reason even more
beautiful than the poetic sentiment of this oration, was a discus
sion of the sanctity of the law of contract which Mr. Storrs pre
sented to John M. Palmer as Governor of the State of Illinois.
Early in 1869, a bill to limit railroad fare within the boundaries
of the State to three cents per mile was offered to Governor
Palmer for his approval. In behalf of all the railroads, though
nominally, as being the strongest opponent in fact, in behalf of
the Illinois Central Railroad company, Mr. Storrs successfully
opposed the would-be enactment, on the ground chiefly that the
State has no sovereign power to impair or alter its own contracts.
The charter of the railroad provided that the directors of the
company should have the power, and hence the right, to establish
rates of toll for person and property, and that they might levy
and collect the same for the use of the company, upon the pay
ment of a per centum upon its gross earnings into the treasury
of the State. The charter, Mr. Storrs, assumed to be a binding
contract ; the contract granted a franchise which was fundamentally
property and, no legislature can deprive a man of his property
without due process of law. The legislature not being able to
assume judicial functions, as " police regulations " or otherwise, the
bill could not stand. Those admiring clear-cut reasoning can
afford to stop to enjoy the following argument, given in full, where
many others will pass it unread :
Mr. Storrs argued :
POETICAL ORATORY AND COLD REASONING. 22 5
" I shall assume in this discussion :
" i. That the charters of the various railroad corporations in this State are
contracts, binding upon each party thereto, precisely to the same extent as
the various provisions of a contract would be binding upon individual
parties.
"2. That the grant of any power to a railroad corporation by its charter,
essential for the proper management of its business, becomes a right thus
vested in such corporation, by force of the contract, which cannot be impaired
by the State from whence the power is derived.
"3. That powers thus granted are attended with the necessary implication
that they shall be reasonably exercised, but that such question cannot be
determined by either party to the contract."
" The Act under discussion is general in its operation, and includes all the
railroads now in existence in the State, over thirty miles in length.
"The intent of the bill clearly is to establish uniform rates of fares, by
bringing all the railroads in the State within its operation.
" If by this bill, the rights which the State has granted to any one company
are at all impaired or changed, the bill must fall, for as to such road it
would clearly be unconstitutional, and the bill, if void in part, the intent
not being severable, would be void in toto.
POWER TO FIX TOLLS GRANTED BY CHARTER.
" By the Act incorporating the Illinois Central Railroad Company, it is pro
vided that 'The board of directors shall have power to establish such rates
of toll for the conveyance of persons and property upon the same, as they
shall from time to time by their by-laws direct and determine, and to levy
and collect the same for the use of said company.'
" I am of opinion, that were this power to affix tolls not expressly granted,
it would exist by necessary implication ; but I refer to this as the language
employed in it is so clear that there can be no possibility of misunderstand
ing it. It is a grant of power to the company,
1. To affix rates of toll for freight and passengers.
2. To determine for itself what those rates shall be.
3. To levy and collect the same.
" Thus the State has granted to the Illinois Central Company a power dis
tinct, definite and valuable in its character, and without the right to exer
cise which the franchise is utterly valueless. Without the power to levy and
collect tolls, for freight and passengers, it is difficult to see how a railroad
could be managed at all, unless it were purely from motives of benevolence.
The State has agreed with this company that they may affix rates of toll.
Has the State violated, or is this bill an attempt to violate, that contract?
" The answer, it seems to us, is clear. By this bill, the state declares to
the road, 'you shall no longer affix tolls for passengers and freight, as we
have agreed that you may, but ive will hereafter affix those rates.' The
right thus conferred by the charter is a grant of power, the exercise of
which is essential to the proper prosecution of its business. This grant of
power is, by the bill under discussion, revoked. The grant is withdrawn,
226 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORRS.
and the power which the State has said to the company it may exercise, it
withdraws, and proposes to exercise itself. It seems idle to us to argue
whether this attempt by the legislature impairs the obligation of the con
tract. It not only impairs, but it destroys that contract. It is not merely
a failure to give to the company what the State has already agreed that it
may have, but it is wresting from the company a power conferred upon it,
and exercising that power itself.
V The contract by the State is, that the directors of the company may
affix such rates of toil as they ' may direct and determine.' But by this
law the legislature declares to the company that it can only affix such rates
as the legislature 'may direct and determine.'
"That this is an essential alteration of the charter is clear beyond dispute.
That it changes the rights of the parties to that contract cannot admit of
doubt ; and that it is beyond the power of the legislature, of its own will,
to lessen the obligations of the State, to enlarge its rights, or to extend the
obligations of the company under the contract, is too well settled to admit
of discussion.
" It would seem clear that if it was within the power of the State to
interfere with the right to affix tolls, it might also as well interfere with the
granted rights to levy and collect them. If it could say that the company
could levy and collect one cent per mile for passengers, it might as well
declare that it could levy and collect no passenger fares whatever. Not
only does the bill now under discussion offend in the particular that it pre
vents the company from exercising its ceded right to direct and determine
what the tolls shall be, but it also prevents the company from levying and
collecting tolls beyond a certain amount. The concession of this right to
the legislature involves an admission of power by them to destroy the entire
revenues of the corporation, by preventing them from levying or collecting
them.
" Upon the theory of* this bill, the rates of toll for freight and passengers
on the Illinois Central Railroad, might be reduced so that the gross
receipts might be insufficient to pay the actual expenses of the road, and
yet the company would be obliged to pay its per centum upon its gross
earnings into the treasury of the State.
" The charter of the Central road provides that the directors of the com
pany shall have the power, and hence the right, to establish rates of toll
for persons and property, and that they may levy and collect the same for
the use of the company. The right upon the part of the directors to
establish and collect toll, is a clear, unmistakable right, by the express
provision of the charter. This law has taken away that right from the
directors and given it to the legislature, thus superseding the directors,
by the appointment of the legislature as the competent authority to
establish and collect tolls.
" This is the exercise of a special function on the part of the legisla
ture which is expressly prohibited by the letter of the Constitution, and
in violation of the fundamental theory of American politics, that the gov
ernment is in distinct, independent, co-ordinate departments. It is an
invasion of the department of the judiciary."
POETICAL ORATORY AND COLD REASONING. 22 /
THE REASONABLENESS OF RATES A JUDICIAL QUESTION.
" It is contended, however, that the grant of power to the corporation to
determine and affix tariffs for freight and passengers and to collect the
same, is accompanied with the implied reservation, that the power must be
reasonably exercised. That the tolls thus affixed must be reasonable.
"This might be conceded, but, as we think, the establishment of that
doctrine does not advance the argument. The question then at once arises,
By whom shall the reasonableness of the tolls imposed be determined ?
Our answer is, By the courts, and by the courts alone.
"If the construction which is sought to be put upon a contract varies
the contract, changes any of its terms, or alters the obligation of the parties
to it, such construction would be as obnoxious to the Constitution as would
a direct attempt to avoid or change it.
"The act in question does not in this particular merely construe the con
tract, but it determines the liabilities and duties of the parties under it.
It attempts to decide whether a certain line of action under the charter
is consistent with it, and justified by it. It attempts to decide what, under
the contract, the parties to it may not do. The decision* of such questions
cannot be assumed by the legislative department of the government.
" This act declares substantially —
"I. The grant of power to affix rates contained in the charter must
be understood to be exercised within reasonable limits; and,
" 2. The charge of over three cents per mile is unreasonable, and there
fore a violation of the contract.
" No one, I apprehend, will deny for a moment that the right to affix
tolls for passengers and freight is expressly conferred by its charter upon
the Illinois Central Railroad Company, and either expressly or by implica
tions upon all other companies, nor will any one claim that there is any
limitation upon the exercise of that right other than that it must be within
reasonable limits, and to say that without trial, evidence, or any oppor
tunity of being heard upon the subject, the legislature may decide that the
company has exceeded those limits, seems to us like a violation of every
principle of constitutional law and natural justice.
"Upon this point, authority is abundant. Thus in Newland v. Marsh, 19
111. 383, the court say, 'The legislative department assuming and being
allowed to judge of the character and extent of its own powers, would soon
become the ex parte arbiter of private rights, and the frequent dispenser
of justice between citizen and citizen, unrestrained according to its own
notion of right. . . . The legislative power extends only to the making
of laws, and in its exercise is limited and restrained by the paramount
authority of the federal and state constitutions. It cannot directly reach
the property or vested rights of the citizen by providing for their forfeiture,
or transfer to another, without trial and judgment in the courts ; for to do
so would be the exercise of a power which belongs to another branch of
the government, and is forbidden to the legislative.' In Sedgwick on
Statutory and Constitutional Law, pages 146, 147, the rule is thus stated:
'It is, then, as a general rule, equally true of England and of the United
228 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
States, that while the law-making power is exclusively confined to one
branch of the government, that department neither construes nor enforces
its own acts. The enactment of laws belongs to the legislature, their con
struction and application to the judiciary, the enforcement to the execu
tive.' In Lane v. Dorman, 3 Scammon, this language is held: 'By the
first section of the first article of the State constitution, the powers of the
government of the State are divided into three distinct departments, and
each of these confined to a separate body of magistracy, viz, those which
are executive to another, and those which are judicial to another.
"By the second section of the article, no person or collection of persons
being one of those departments, shall exercise any power properly belonging
to either of the others, except as is therein expressly directed or permitted.
The exercise of judicial powers by the General Assembly is not one of the
exceptions, nor is it one of the permissions contained or referred to in the
proviso to this second section; consequently the exercise of such powers by
it is positively forbidden and expressly inhibited, and has been delegated
solely to the judicial department. The inquiry thus becomes important,
has the legislature, by the passage of this law, violated this provision of
the Constitution ?
" It will be seen, from the synopsis of the act made, that evidence must be
presumed to have been received and facts ascertained by the legislature, before
its decision, f>r it has without such evidence arbitrarily assumed the facts
to exist ; and on such Ascertainment or assumption, a decision is made in
the nature of a decree. For the act directs a sale of lands, and orders the
appropriation of its proceeds to the persons on whose application, and for
whose benefit, the act was adopted, and adjudges the costs to be paid out
of the estate. If this is not the exercise of a power of inquiring into, and a
determination of facts between debtor and creditor, and that, too, ex parte
and summary in its character, we are at a loss to understand the meaning
of terms ; nay, that it is adjudging and directing the application of one per
son's property to another, on a claim of indebtedness, without notice to or
hearing of the parties whose estate is divested by the act.
" That the exercise of such powers is, in its nature, clearly judicial we
think too apparent to need argument to illustrate its truth.
" It is so self-evident from the facts Disclosed that it proves itself, and it
is not less certain that the exercise thereof is in direct conflict with the
articles of the Constitution cited.
" It can hardly be presumed that in this case evidence was introduced
before the legislature as to the reasonableness of the tolls for freight and
passengers now imposed by the railroad corporations of this State. The
question is vital, and in its decision the companies are quite as much inter
ested as the public. No decision can be rendered against it, on such a
point, unless the company has failed cither in the performance of the duties
which the charter has imposed upon it, or has exceeded the powers which
the legislature conferred.
"Whether the Illinois Central Railroad Company has failed in the per
formance of any of its duties or exceeded its powers, must, so far as the pre-
POETICAL ORATORY AND COLD REASONING. 22Q
sent question is concerned, rest entirely upon the fact whether its charges
are grossly unreasonable. It attempts, we will say, to charge four cents per
mile for passengers, and the State, or rather the legislature, asserts that it
possesses no power to charge that sum, and that it has no right to charge
over three cents per mile. It is quite competent for the State to raise
that question, but it is not competent for it to decide the question. To
concede that such a question, involving the right of one party to the con
tract, could be determined by the other without evidence, is too flagrantly
unjust to admit of discussion, and the hearing" of evidence in such a case
is equally clearly beyond its powers.
" The tribunal to which the decision of these questions is confided is the
courts. By no other department of the goverment can the hearing and
decision of questions of conflicting right between parties be had.
"The assumption of such a power by the legislature, even in the adjudi
cation and decision of rights between third parties, would be unendurable,
but when the State affects to exercise that power in the case of a contract
to which it is a party, the case is infinitely worse, and would be permitted
under no system of government now known among civilized men.
" If it be conceded that it is beyond the power of the legislature to decide
whether fares are reasonable or unreasonable, the conclusion then inevitably
follows that the law is unconstitutional, because, that by the act under dis
cussion the legislature does attempt to decide what rates of toll are reason
able or unreasonable is clear beyond question. This, as we have seen, is
an assumption of judicial power, which, by sec. 2, art. 2, of the Constitu
tion, is expressly prohibited. That section provides, that ' no person or col
lection of persons, being one of these departments, shall exercise any
power properly belonging to either of the others, except as hereinafter
expressly directed or permitted ; and all acts in contravention of this sec
tion shall be void'
"The mere fact, therefore that the bill under discussion does assume to
decide that the companies have no power to fix rates of passenger tolls,
beyond a certain price, and does attempt to decide what rates are reason
able, brings the bill directly within the operation of the section of the Con
stitution I have quoted, and it is and must be declared void.
WHAT ARE POLICE REGULATIONS.
" It cannot, we think, be successfully contended that this bill amounts
merely to a police regulation, which the State might, by virtue of its sover
eign authority, rightfully make.
"The right to affix tolls is a grant of power secured to the railroad com
panies by their charters. It is a franchise most valuable in its character.
"This right the company possesses by virtue of the agreement made with
the State. In the case of The Regent of the University of Maryland v.
Williams, 9 Gill £ Johnson, 403, it was held that a power conveyed by the
charter to pass ordinances and make regulations for the discipline and
government of the University, was a franchise which could not be taken
away by the act of the legislature. In The Bank of the Republic v.
23O LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
County of Hamilton, 21 111. 59, the distinction is drawn between powers
secured to the corporation by contract, and those which are mere endow
ments of their existence. ' The former,' the court says, ' are their prop
erty, of which they cannot be deprived without just compensation.'
"No power certainly could be more explicitly conveyed, than the grant
to the Illinois Central Railroad Company, to fix such rates of toll for tariff
of passengers as the directors may determine. It is the contract of the
State with the company, about which there can be no room for construc
tion, for the language is unmistakable in its meaning.
"The regulation requiring the ringing of bells, the erection of warning
posts, etc., are purely police regulations, which, as the sovereign power,
the State has a right to make, for securing public and individual safety.
"In such case, however, the power is thus exercised by the State, not as
a party to the contract, but as a sovereign power acting for the safety of
all its citizens. The general rule is well stated in Cooley s Constitutional
Limitations, p. 279.
"'Those charters of incorporation, however, which are granted not as a
part of the machinery of government, but for the private benefit or purposes
of the corporators, are held to be contracts between the legislature and the
corporators, based for their consideration on the liabilities and duties which
the corporators assume by accepting them ; and the grant of the franchise
can no more be resumed by the legislature, or its benefit diminished or
impaired, without the assent of the grantees, than any other grant of prop
erty, or valuable thing, unless the right to do so is reserved in the charter
itself.' See, also, cases cited.
"And so again, in the same book, page 362, the author says: 'But a
vested right of action is property in the same sense in which tangible things
are property, and is equally protected against arbitrary interference. Where
it springs from contract or from the principles of the common law, it is not
competent for the legislature to take it away. Nor can a party, by his
misconduct, forfeit such a right, unless steps be taken to have the forfeit
ure declared in due judical proceedings.*
PUBLIC SAFETY.
"An attempt by the legislature to interfere with an expressly ceded
power to affix tolls and to levy and collect them can be justified on no
ground of public safety. If those rates are reasonable, public safety would
not demand that they be interfered with. The general right to impose tolls
cannot be impaired because it is specially granted. Such power is exer
cised in entire harmony with public safety so long as the tolls are reason
able. When they cease to be reasonable is a question which courts must
decide, and merely calling an attempt to decide that question the enforce
ment of police regulations, makes the act none the less an assumption of
judicial power, and none the less an impairing of the obligation of the
contract. The case may thus be stated : If the tariffs of charges for freight
and passengers are reasonable, then no consideration of public safety can
justify an interference with them.
POETICAL ORATORY AND COLD REASONING. 23!
" If they are unreasonable, the remedy is with the courts. Whether they
are or are not reasonable, is a question which must be decided upon evi
dence, and after hearing both parties, as well the party to the contract, who,
it is deemed, has violated it by charging unreasonable rates, as the party
who alleges that such violation has been made.
"In short, the rates of fares are in no way connected with considerations
of public safety. The subjects are distinct and utterly dissimilar, because
neither public safety nor private safety is at all involved in the amount of
fare which the passengers may be compelled to pay.
RAILROADS HAVE NOT BEEN REPRESENTED.
" It can hardly be said that the railroad corporations have had a hearing
before the legislature, nor can it be said that they have been represented.
It is sometimes charged, indeed, that a particular railroad has its represen
tative in either the Senate or the House, but the people are represented in
the legislature, and railroads, as such, are not and cannot be.
" Even were it, in a theoretical sense, true that, in a certain vicarious way,
the railroad companies were represented in the State legislature, still that
would not answer the objection that, in the decision of the question as to
the reasonableness of charges, no hearing has been had and no evidence
taken. There has been no trial, and, in the State Legislature, there could be
none. Certainly if the legislature, the other party to the contract, was to sit
as a court on the decision of this question, the railroads would have good
reason to complain, or if they supposed that a court thus constituted was at
all prejudiced in the case, ought certainly to be entitled to a change of
venue.
PUBLIC CONVENIENCE.
"Nor are considerations of public convenience of any force in justify
ing this bill. In any case where it is admitted that considerations of
public convenience are sufficiently strong, and its demand sufficiently exi
gent to require the interposition of legislative power, such power can only be
exercised to secure the convenience of the whole public, as an exercise of
the right of eminent domain, and upon just compensation paid.
" Private convenience can justify no legislative interference with private
rights ; nor would the fact that it was inconvenient for a certain passenger,
or a number of passengers, to pay more than one cent per mile for riding
on a railroad train, justify the legislature in declaring that the railroad com
pany must suit itself to the pecuniary convenience of such passengers, and
carry them for one cent per mile, on the ground that it was a police regu
lation, or on any other ground.
THE ACT IS ILLIBERAL.
"By section 6 of article 10 of the Constitution, it is provided that 'the
General Assembly shall encourage internal improvements by passing liberal
general laws of incorporation for that purpose.' By the passage of this law,
the legislatures have given construction to the charter of the Illinois Cen
tral Railroad Company, as they have given construction to the charter of
232 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
all other roads ; and the construction thus given by the assertion of the
right to interfere with and control the exercise of the right to establish
tolls, is most illiberal, and contrary to the spirit of the Constitution, as
above quoted.
"The law, ;n its operation, will prevent the investment of capital in internal
improvements, by being illiberal towards corporate rights, and by becoming
a part of all acts of incorporation, will tend to subvert the great purpose of
the Constitution in its provision for such a system of liberal legislation as
will tend to foster and promote public improvements.
"It is also to be borne in mind that the requirements of the law are
exceedingly stringent, in demanding from the companies the exercise of the
utmost of human care, sagacity and foresight, and the use of all modern
appliances to secure the safety of the passenger. These results can only
be secured from the revenues of the corporation, derived from its imposition
of tolls for freights and passengers. It can hardly be expected that such
an obligation can be performed in its full measure, if the legislature deprives
the companies of the means by which safety is to be secured. The effect
of continuous interference by the legislature with the fixing of rates for
passengers and freight, can be no less than seriously to impair the revenue
of these corporations, and their ability to discharge the duties which the law
has imposed upon them.
LEGISLATIVE POWER OVER NATURAL PERSONS.
" It is claimed, as we understand, that inasmuch as it is assumed that
the legislature has the power to affix the rates of charges imposed by a
common carrier, where such carrier is a natural person, it must possess the
same and equal power over a corporation, which is a being of legislative
creation.
"Without stopping here to discuss the question whether it is within the
power of the legislature to say to a man engaged as a common carrier, by
his own private methods of conveyance, that he shall only charge certain
rates for his services, it is clear that there is and can be no similarity
between the cases. The question in this connection is, whether one party to
a contract even though one of those parties be the State, can impair its
obligation or affect its terms. If the State had entered into a contract with
a private individual by which, upon payment .of a certain consideration by
such individual, it had agreed that he might affix such charges as he might
see fit and determine, the same question, it might with some propriety be
said, would be presented as is involved in the discussion of this bill. The
distinction between the case put by the advocates of the bill, and the one
presented by the bill itself, is the very obvious one of the difference which
always exists, and always must exist, between the obligations of parties to
each other, where those obligations are defined and fixed by contract, and
where they are simply the general obligations subsisting between them as
citizens.
"The question presented by this bill is, whether it impairs the obligations
of a contract, and it is not what the power of the State may be in the
POETICAL ORATORY AND COLD REASONING. 233
exercise of its merely political functions over its citizens. The State has no
sovereign power to impair or alter its own contracts, or the contracts of
any one else. If the contract of the State is with an individual, it cannot
impair it. If with a corporation, it cannot impair that.
"I deem it unnecessary to discuss the metaphysical powers of govern
ments generally. It is sufficient to say that in this country legislative power
is limited by the fundamental law. The legislature of the State can pass
no law impairing the obligation of a contract, and that a charter granted to
a corporation is a contract, is fundamental.
"The legislature can deprive no freeman of his property, without due
process of law, and that a franchise granted by a charter is property, is
fundamental.
"The legislature cannot assume judicial functions, and any act of that
character is utterly void. The ^question presented by this bill is, Does the
act fall within any of the above stated limitations of legislative power? and
any time expended in discussing what the legislature might do with a cor
poration, or an individual, to whom it was bound by no contract, is, we
suggest, wide of the mark, and a waste of time. It will be sufficient to
decide what a legislature may do in regulating the business affairs of its
citizens when that question arises. The question now is, What may the
legislature do with reference to the rights of parties or corporations which it
has secured to them by contract?
"If the charters of the railroad companies are contracts, if the right to
fix tolls is a franchise, the bill is unconstitutional, because it seeks to
deprive the companies of those rights. The same would be true of any
private individual similarly situated.
THE BILL RELEASES THE ILLINOIS CENTRAL FROM THE PAYMENT OF ITS
PERCENTAGE.
"The effect which this bill may have upon the payment, by the Illinois
Central Railroad Company, of the percentage upon its gross or total
proceeds, receipts or income, derived from said road and branches, cannot
be safely overlooked.
"Sec. 8 contains a grant of power to the company, as has been seen.
"The i8th section provides that 'in consideration of the grants, privileges
and franchises hereby conferred,' the said company shall make the pay
ments.
" It would seem clear that these considerations are dependent upon each
other. That a failure by the company to make the payments stipulated,
would result in a forfeiture of its charter upon quo warranfo, and with
equal force, that a withdrawal by the State of the franchises, which it had
conferred, constituting the consideration upon which the company had
agreed to pay its percentage, would operate to relieve it from making such
payment, is undeniable.
"The amount of that percentage being about six hundred thousand
dollars per year, any act which would release the company from its pay
ment is sufficiently serious to the tax-payers in the State to justify with-
234 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
holding assent to any bill, the result of which may be to withdraw that
large sum from the revenue of the State.
" The benefits of this bill are, in a great measure derived by non-residents
who make up a great share of the passenger traffic of our railroads. The
burdens imposed by the loss of this large sum, fall in increased taxation
directly upon our own people.
"It is easy enough to say that this bill has no such effect, but I submit
that the enjoyment of the franchises conveyed by the charter, is a condition
precedent to the payment of the percentage by the company, for it is
expressly declared that the agreement of the company to pay the per-centum
is ' in consideration of the grants, privileges and franchises herein con
ferred.'
" Finally, This legislation is crude, and does not reach the grievances of
which complaint is made. The effect of this bill upon the future commer
cial interests of the State is sufficiently serious to require the most careful
and deliberate investigation before action shall be had. No argument can
add to the mere statement of the supreme importance to the interests
of the State of this question. The extreme sensitiveness of capital
to legislative interference, its generally conceded readiness to submit its
interests to the decision of the courts, must induce, it seeems to us,
a reluctance to invest in future railroad enteprises in the State, and
necessarily divert the current of trade from our own to other States.
"That the people have suffered grievances at the hands of railroad cor
porations may be true, but so long as courts are open, and our judiciary
possesses the entire confidence of the people, it is believed that those
grievances may be redressed by resort to judicial tribunals, where facts
may be certainly and definitely ascertained, and rights adjusted upon the
basis of the facts thus determined."
CHAPTER XIV.
THE FREE TRADE QUESTION, 1 870.
MR. STORRS' LUCID EXPOSITION OF ECONOMIC QUESTIONS — THE HIGH TARIFF
A WAR MEASURE — A NEEDLESS SURPLUS IN THE TREASURY — A GENERAL
DEMAND FOR A REDUCTION OF TAXATION — THE "PROTECTION OF AMERI
CAN INDUSTRY " — THE FARMERS NEED TO BE PROTECTED AGAINST PROTEC
TION — "THE GREATEST GOOD OF THE GREATEST NUMBER," A FUNDAMEN
TAL PRINCIPLE OF AMERICAN POLITICS — PROTECTION AND SLAVERY — ONE
KIND OF INDUSTRY COMPELLED TO PAY TRIBUTE TO ANOTHER — PROTECTION
DIMINISHES REVENUE — A SYSTEM OF LEGALIZED PLUNDER OF THE CON
SUMER—DIVERSIFYING LABOR BY LEGISLATION— " THE PAUPER LABOR OF
EUROPE."
OF all the fields of human inquiry, perhaps there is none so
arid and uninviting as political economy, which Carlyle, not
without reason, called the " dismal science." In 1870, addressing
a convention at Springfield, Illinois, which was largely made up
of agricultural representatives, Mr. Storrs showed that by his
power of lucid exposition and happy illustration he could make
even an economic question interesting. The people generally were
crying out for a reduction 'of the heavy burdens of taxation
imposed for the purpose of carrying on the war, and to which
they had patriotically consented as a necessary war measure.
These taxes were raised by means of the most oppressive pro
hibitive tariff on foreign goods, and a correspondingly high tax
on goods of domestic manufacture ; and now that the war was
ended, and the government had an enormous surplus of one hun
dred millions of dollars in the Treasury, men of all political parties
naturally thought the time had come for a substantial measure of
relief.
Mr. Storrs' address is a masterly exposition of the tariff, and of
235
236 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
the protectionist fallacies which were then everywhere being
brought forward in favor of its continuance. In later years, he
saw reason to modify his opinions, under circumstances which will
be narrated in the proper place. His free trade manifesto in 1870
was as follows :
" The grave political questions arising during the progress of the rebellion,
and the questions resulting from the war, as affecting the restoration of the
seceding States, are so far settled at least as to justify the direction of public
attention to, and the discussion of, questions of a financial character, which
are, whether we would have it so or not, pressing for decision.
" It may quite safely be said that no attempt at all serious in its character
will be made by any political party to re-open the questions settled by the
war. The right of secession from the Union was conclusively denied at
Appomattox Court House. The freedom of the slave is an accomplished
fact. The repudiation of the national debt has received its quietus at the
hands of the people and in Congress ; and although there are wide differ
ences of opinion still existing as to the manner in which the debt shall be
paid, it is quite safe to say that all parties are agreed that it shall be paid.
" During the prosecution of the war it was deemed necessary, in order to
enable the government to meet the gigantic expenses which its prosecution
entailed, to impose upon every conceivable product of human use, wear, or
consumption heavier tariffs than had ever before been known in our history.
Taxes were also levied upon nearly everything that we ate, or drank, or
wore, upon the product of our industry, upon the articles which we manu
factured, and upon the incomes which are derived from the prosecution of
our business, whatever that business might be. But little complaint was
made against these tariffs and taxes while the war was pending. They were
regarded by the great mass of the people as war measures, and to cease
when the war itself ceased. Moreover, as every form of industry and almost
every character of business was stimulated to a feverish activity by the vast
requirements of the government, aided in no small degree by a paper cur
rency, these taxes, onerous as they were, were easily paid, and hence, dur
ing that period of time, public complaints were not frequent. But the war
finally ended. The vast demands of the government upon the industry of
the country ceased. Nearly a million of men who had been engaged in
the armies, relieved from those duties, returned quietly but suddenly to their
ordinary pursuits. As the currency was contracted and appreciated in value,
prices began to "shrink, and under such a change of circumstances the bur
dens of taxation began at once to be felt, and the desire in some measure
to be relieved from those burdens came to be almost universally expressed,
and the necessity for some such relief is urgent and undeniable.
" I have said that the imposition ©f the heavy tariff during the war, and
the general scheme of taxation then adopted, were generally regarded as
war measures, to be dispensed with when the war itself should cease. The
war ceased four years ago ; but the tariffs have not ceased, nor have they
A SPEECH ON FREE TRADE, 1 8/0.
even been lessened. Nay, they have been increased since the close of the
war.
"The requirements of the government are certainly not as great as they
were five years ago. Its expenses have been, during the short period of
time that General Grant has been President, reduced many millions. A vast
amount of the national debt has already been paid, and in the midst of
general business depression the over-burdened public are curiously enough
confronted by a surplus which will, during the year 1869-70, reach at least
one hundred millions, and probably one hundred and twenty-five millions of
dollars. A surplus so gigantic demonstrates, better than any argument could
possibly do, that taxation is unnecessarily high. The fact that the govern
ment will have, during the current year, from one hundred to one hundred
and twenty-five millions of dollars beyond its actual wants and necessities is of
the greatest significance when placed by the side of the other universally
conceded fact that taxes and tariffs are seriously burdening the industry and
the prosperity of the people.
"A demand to reduce the tariff to something like its former proportions
cannot be met by the answer that the necessities of the government, in the
payment of the principal or interest of the public debt, require that the
present rate of tariffs shall be maintained, for the government is certain to
have, during the current year, one hundred and twenty-five million dollars
more than it will require for the payment of all its expenses, including the
maturing interest upon its debt. However desirable the speedy payment
of the national debt may be regarded, there are probably but very few
men who would deem it wise or prudent to attempt its entire payment
within a period of ten or fifteen years, nor would the people readily
consent that from one hundred million dollars to one hundred and twenty-
five million dollars over and above the interest upon the debt, and the ordinary
expenses of the government, should be yearly raised by taxation and tariffs,
even were that sum to be religiously appropriated toward such payment.
That the people are under a serious and oppressive burden of taxation
is a fact so conspicuous that it cannot be denied. How shall that burden
be lightened? is a question now being asked in language so emphatic that
some satisfactory answer must be made to it. The present administration
has achieved much by the steady reduction of the national expenses and
by increased efficiency in the collection of the revenue, but still there
stands, in a time of profound peace, an enormous tariff, the effect of which
is felt in every department of business, and the maintenance of which
enhances the cost of living of every man in the land. Why should that
tariff be continued ? The fact of the surplus to which I have referred
demonstrates that it is not necessary for the support of the government, and
so those who are interested in maintaining it are compelled to place their
demands upon what they call the "protection of American industry."
"As briefly as may be, I purpose this evening to discuss a few general
principles affecting the theory of protection. It will be quite impossible to
enter very largely, if indeed at all/ into detail. And first I will inquire
238 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
precisely what is meant by protecting American industry? Against what,
or against whom, is American industry to be protected ? Who attacks, or
proposes to attack, American industry? How is the attack made? Is
American industry so feeble that it cannot, without assistance from the
government, protect itself?
"These are all vital questions. If no one is attacking American industry,
it needs no protection. If it is able to defend itself, it should call for no
protection. The forms of American industry are wonderfully diversified.
The great body of the farmers of the country constitute a large element of
what may be called American industry, and I know of no attack upon them
so serious in its character as that made by the tariff; and if the farmers
need protection against anything, it is against protection. There are
thousands of printers in the country ; who attacks or proposes to attack
them? No one, except it be the tariff, which enhances the cost of the
material with which their industry is carried on, of the clothes which they
wear, of the coal which they burn, of the lumber with which their homes
are built, of the salt which they consume, and of the books which they
read. There are thousands of ship-builders in the country ; who attacks
them and their interests, and from what enemy do they need to be pro
tected? The deserted ship yards of the East answer this question — they
need to be protected against protection, and that is all the protection they
need. The thousands and hundreds of thousands of carpenters and joiners,
boot and shoemakers, blacksmiths, and the daily toilers with their hands,
upon the land or upon the sea, are threatened with no attack against
which, for their own protection, the intervention of the government is ne
cessary.
"The fundamental principle of American politics is 'the greatest good
to the greatest number.' As a member of the Republican party, I at the
organization of that party believed that the institution of slavery was a
special interest. I was willing to say of it, 'if it can stand up and sustain
itself against the sharp and eager competition of free labor, let it stand.
If it cannot, let it fall. I am opposed to protecting it, for the protection of
that interest is a war upon all other interests.' I deny that the imposition
of heavy tariffs upon particular articles of manufacture is protection. It is
a burden instead of a protection ; a burden upon all those who use or con
sume such articles; a bounty to the persons manufacturing them, that bounty
being paid by the consumer ; and if the consumers are more numerous than
the manufactures, the fundamental idea of our politics is at once violated,
government then being administered, not for the greatest good of the greatest
number, but for the greatest good to the least number, and the least good to
the greater number. Moreover, it is not the policy of our government to con
fer special privileges upon any special classes of men. Our theory is that
of individual development, of leaving each man the architect of his own
fortunes. All that our government, or indeed any government, should do is
to see to it that in the race each man starts, before the law, even with his
neighbor. In such a race, to place extra weights upon the swift-footed and
the strong-lunged man is not, in fact, protection to the weak-kneed and the
A SPEECH ON FREE TRADE, iS/O. 239
narrow-chested man. He runs no faster, nor \vill his legs or lungs hold out
any longer, by reason of the weights which are put upon his competitor. He
may under such circumstances, win in the race; but the purpose of govern
ment is that the swiftest, and not that the slowest man shall win. Who
would dream of calling such a policy 'the protection of American speed,
wind, and bottom?' In such a race I would prefer to see the iron manu
facturer and the farmer start even; but, if the farmer is to be loaded down
with heavy weights of taxation, and not only that, shall be compelled to stop
and lift his competitor over all the rough places which he may encounter on
the route, I should call it a very unfair race, and would never think, were it
not suggested by the iron manufacturer himself, that I had all the time been
protecting American industry. Reason and refine upon it as we may, pro
tection to any manufacturing interest means simply such legislation as enables
the manufacturer to sell his manufactured article for a higher price than he
otherwise could obtain, and which compels the consumer to pay for such
article a higher price than he would otherwise be compelled to pay. If it
does not mean this, it means nothing. If the tariff which is imposed for the
purpose of protection does not enable the manufacturer to sell his wares at
a higher price than they would command without the tariff, of what use is
the tariff to him? For the only way in which he can be benefited is by the
enhanced price. This enhanced price the consumer is obliged to pay, not to
the government, but to the manufacturer ; and thus one kind of industry is
compelled to pay tribute to another. A special class is privileged and
enriched at the expense and to the impoverishment of another class. The
home manufacturer is completely protected only when he succeeds in shut
ting out and excluding from competition with him the wares of the foreign
manufacturer. When that is accomplished, revenue ceases; and in precisely
the same proportion that a tariff operates as a protection to the home man
ufacturer, does it operate to reduce the revenues of the government.
" Not only does the so-called protection system offend in the particulars
which I have named, but it is also a direct violation of the liberty of the citizen
to sell where he pleases, and to buy where he can buy cheapest. Every man
should be permitted to sell his labor where he can get the highest price for
it. The question is not, after all, how many dollars does the laboring man
receive for a day's work, but how much of what he must consume will his
day's labor purchase? If a day's labor at $3 per day will purchase for
the laboring man his hat, or his boots, or the blanket which he needs, he
is receiving better pay than when he gets $5 per day, but his boots, or his
hat, or his blanket costs him $10. The laborer should be permitted to take
his labor or its products to the market, where, in exchange for those com
modities which he needs, he can get the most of such commodities. But to
compel the farmer to exchange one day's labor for one yard of cloth man
ufactured in New England, when he might exchange the same amount of
labor for two yards of cloth manufactured in Old England, is merely a sys
tem of legalized plunder of the farmer, instead of protection to American
industry.
" I apprehend that, should the government levy a direct tax upon all the
24O LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
property 01 the country, to be paid over directly to the iron manufacturers,
so that they might be enabled to hold their own against the competition of
the foreign manufacturers, but few would be found who would justify such
an exercise of the power of taxation. If there is any difference between such
a plan and a tariff for protection, the difference is against the tariff. When
reduced to its exact practical operations, the protection of American indus
try, so called, is simply the forcible taking from the consumer of a portion
of his earnings, and handing it over to the manufacturer. The proposition
to the consumer is simply this : We, the government, will take from you 10
or 15 or 20 per cent, of your earnings, and give it to the manufacturer, and,
he will spend it so much more judiciously than you would, that ultimately,
and in the process of time, it will, in some curious and circuitous manner,
which we haven't the time to explain now, rebound more greatly to your
advantage than it would had you spent it yourself and for yourself.
"We are all now in favor of free speech, free thought, free soil, free
labor ; what is there about trade that it should not be free ? If I am per
mitted to attend church where I please, to think upon all political and
religious subjects as I please, why should I not be permitted to buy and
sell where I please? Why should I be compelled to make my exchange
of coin for woolen and cotton goods in New England, my exchange of my
wheat for iron goods in Pennsylvania, my pork and beef for salt at
Syracuse or Saginaw? Am I, thus compulsorily driven to a particular
market, a free man? So far as my corn and wheat and pork and beef are
concerned, I have to come in competition with the world. The prices which
I secure for them are fixed by the markets of the world. I am compelled
to sell, giving to the purchaser all the benefits of the largest competition,
but am compelled to purchase in a restricted market. This, we are assured,
protects American industry.
"The evils resulting from the protective system being so direct and
immediate, so plain and so easily understood, we are naturally led to inquire.
What compensation does the system furnish for the many evils which flow
from it? It will hardly do to answer this inquiry by saying that the system
fosters and encourages American industry, for if the entire agricultural
interests are compelled to pay tribute to the manufacturing, certainly the
former are not thereby fostered and encouraged in following agricultural
pursuits. The ship-builder is not fostered and encouraged in building ships
so long as, through the operation of a tariff, he is compelled to pay so high
a price for almost every article which enters into the construction of a ship
that it costs him nearly twice as much to build a ship here as it costs the
Englishman to build one in his own ports. So long as that difference exists
in the cost of ship-building, those who desire ships will have them built
where they can be built the cheapest, and the industry of our home ship
builder, so far from being fostered and encouraged, is destroyed, and he is
driven from that employment.
"But we are assured that by the protection of home industry we furnish
a home market for our own products. It requires some argument, and
pretty close attention, to the statement of the argument, to clearly perceive
A SPEECH ON FREE TRADE, I 8/ O. 24!
how the farmer, in being compelled by a protective tariff to pay for his
reapers and threshers, his hoes and his spades, his wagons and his harness,
his clothing and his salt, anywhere from 15 to 20 per cent, more than he
otherwise would be compelled, receives an adequate compensation from the
fact that the persons to whom these prices are paid reside at Pittsburg and
Lowell, instead of at Sheffield and Manchester. It is quite true that the
man who employs his entire time in manufacturing iron will not be able to
till the soil, but this is quite as true of the artizan in England as in Penn
sylvania. In order to enhance the price of grain, the general demand for
it must be increased. Our grain market responds as readily to the State
of the English harvests as to the condition of our own. If to-day one half
the laborers in the fields in England should be withdrawn from that form
of industry, that vacancy not being supplied, and at once transferred to the
mill and the workshop, the effect would as readily be felt here as should
the same transfer be made from our own fields. Unless the system of pro
tection decreases the number of grain producers, I fail to see how it is to
affect the prices of grain advantageously. It is not, I believe, claimed that
protection actually" increases the population. The system creates no addi
tional mouths, and unless it be demonstrated that the worker in an iron
mill or in a cotton factory eats more, — is from the nature of his pursuits a
hungrier man than other kinds of laborers, — I fail to see how, by the pro
tective system, the grain market is improved.
"We are also assured that the protective system keeps gold at home;
that, inasmuch as it is not expended for foreign manufactures, it is retained
in the country, and we are thereby made the richer for such retention.
Even if that result were certain to follow from the protective system, it,
would by no means furnish a substantial argument in its favor. If my gold
will buy me more of what I need by expending it abroad than at home
the actual wealth of the country is lessened by compelling me to spend it
at home. If I receive for my labor five dollars per day, in gold, and with
that gold can buy one blanket in New England and two blankets in Old
England, I am a loser, and the country is a loser, in compelling me to buy my
blankets in New England. I am worth, under such a system, just one blanket
less than I would be without it. The gold which I receive represents my
day's labor, and the more of what I need to consume I am enabled to get
with my day's labor, the better I am off.
"Another point strenuously urged by the advocates of protection is that it
diversifies American industry. I do not believe that industry can be diver
sified by legislation. I do not believe that the natural tendencies of man
kind, particularly in this country, set so strongly towards the tilling of the
soil, and rural lives, that an act of Congress is necessary to check them.
The necessities and wants of men are all the provocatives needed to diver
sify labor. This has been shown to be so from the beginning of the world ;
it will probably continue so to the end. Our first parents were, in their first
and happiest condition, engaged in purely rural pursuits and pleasures. After
their expulsion from Paradise, Adam was compelled to manufacture either a
hoe or a spade, before he could dig the soil. Eve also manufactured an
16
242 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
apron. Tubal Cain was a blacksmith. Abel was a wool grower. Noah
was at one time a ship-builder, a-nd after the flood manufactured wines from
grapes grown in his own vineyard, and, as we are informed, was on one
occasion at least a very liberal consumer of his own products. We do not
all raise wheat and corn, although we all consume bread. But the farmer
needs something besides bread. He needs clothing, and the manufacturer
supplies it to him. His horses must be shod, — the blacksmith does it for
him. His grain must reach a market, — the carrier takes it to the market
for him. He must have a house to shelter himself, — the mechanic builds it
for him. His children must be taught, — the schoolmaster teaches them for
him. He must have books and papers to read, — the printer and the pub
lisher furnish them. The manufacturer of clothes, the blacksmith, the
carrier, the mechanic, the teacher, the printer, and the publisher, by the
various articles which they furnish the farmer, supply themselves with bread.
The very structure of civilized society is rested upon this variety of wants
and necessities, and the consequent variety and diversity of employments by
which they may be supplied.
" But I insist that the natural result of the protective policy is not to
diversify labor, but to commit it to some particular channels. For if, through
the intervention of the government, the manufactures of iron goods and wool
en goods receive particular benefits and advantages at the expense of other
forms of industry, the industry which is pursued without these adventitious
aids will certainly desire to change its form and adopt the kind thus specially
favored. When the farmer and the printer, the ship-builder and the car
penter, find that the government leaves them to take care of themselves,
and compels them to pay tribute to the iron manufacturer and the cotton or
woolen manufacturer, they will abandon their former pursuits and seek the
more favored one, just as certainly as the night succeeds the day. The
attempt to diversify labor by legislation is like an attempt to diversify the
character of our garments by a statute. We will probably wear light goods
when the heats of summer are upon us, and heavier and thicker ones when
the frosts of winter are about us. We diversify our wearing apparel to meet
the diversities of climate ; we will just as naturally diversify our labor to
meet the diversities of our wants, necessities, and tastes.
" Another favorite argument of the protectionists is that it is unjust to sub
mit our industry to competition with what they call the pauper labor of Europe.
This argument, if it may be called an argument, answers itself. The price
of the manufactured article naturally depends in a great measure on the price
of labor. employed in its manufacture. The price of that labor depends neces
sarily upon the relation between the supply of such labor and the demand
for it. If, by a protective tariff, the production of cotton goods is largely
and unnaturally increased, the demand for that kind of labor will also 'be
increased ; the supply will meet that demand ; industry will be deviated
from other channels, and the very fact that a feverish and unnatural demand
for that kind of labor is created, tends inevitably to the lessening of the
wages of the operative. An artificial stimulus given to the manufacturing
interests in this country brings to our shores what is called the pauper labor of
A SPEECH ON FREE TRADE, iS/O. 243
Europe. With that labor our own industry must be brought into competition,
and there is no method more positively certain of bringing the prices of
labor down to mere factory rates than by making the country one vast fac
tory. The jingling phrase, 'American prices for American labor,' means
nothing, unless it be a fact that American prices are better and larger than
any other prices. If English prices for labor are higher than American
prices, then I am in favor of English prices for American labor. The fact
is that when we take into account the difference between our currency and
gold, and the price of living between this country and the Old World, the
prices paid to the skilled artizan in England, in France, and in Belgium, are
greater than are paid in this country.
" Legislation cannot regulate prices any more than it can change the rota
tion of the seasons. A policy which looks to a rapid and artificial increase
in the number of laborers in any branch of industry can have but one con
sequence, and that is a reduction in the rewards of each laborer. Unless
all natural laws have ceased to operate, such must be the result. The old
manufacturers of the Damascus blade needed no protection. The superior
quality of the steel, and the superior skill of the artisans engaged in
the manufacture, furnished all the protection that was needed. Demosthenes
needed no -protection against the competition of foreign orators ; nor did
Pericles or Phidias seek a discriminating tariff to aid them in their appeals
to Athenian taste and culture against the competition of the foreign sculptor or
painter. Socrates and Plato, for success with their countrymen, needed no
tariff upon philosophy to give them precedence over all competitors, but
the vigor of their understandings and the marvellous skill with which they
gave expression to their ideas adequately protected them against any and all
competition. Great skill and great genius protect themselves. They carry
always with them a shield which renders them absolutely secure against all
attacks, save those made by greater skill and greater genius ; and before such
attacks they ought to be subdued ; they will be overcome, and all the legis
lative art and legerdemain on earth cannot long postpone such result.
"We are also assured that the country is new and young, and that we
must have a protective tariff for the benefit of our infant manufacturers.
When, I ask, will the country be old? When .will our manufactures pass
the adolescent period, and reach the quality of manhood? If to-day there
were carved out of the British Isles another empire, the empire thus newly
created, as a distinct national existence, would be new, but in every other
sense it would be as old as the original empire from which it was taken.
Nations are not new or old dating merely from the commencement of their
national existence, but from the experience with which the history of the
world has supplied them. This young republic of ours, almost the newest
born among the nations, is vastly older than the old Assyrians, who flour
ished hundreds of years and then fell, thousands of years ago. It is older
in the experiences of the world than the Egyptians, whose unriddled
sphinxes lie half buried in the desert sands, and whose mighty pyra
mids, records of which are lost in the early morning of this world's
history, in the midst of utter barrenness, rear their collossal forms against
244 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
the sky. All that past art, or science, or skill, or thought, or study, has
taught, is ours. Reckoning the age of a people by its possessions, we are
the oldest people in the world. There is no infancy in our national life. It
is the bone and gristle of manhood. That our territorial extent is great,
and as yet undeveloped, is true, but a protective tariff will neither lessen its
territorial extent nor assist in the rescue from the native wildness of the
prairie or the forest the portions which the industry of man has not yet
touched. In the sense in which it is said that our country is new, it will
remain so just as long as it has not the same amount of population to the
square mile as England and France and Belgium. A protective tariff will
not hasten that increase of population; nor would the immediate doubling
of the laboring interests materially benefit those who are already here.
"But what about our infant manufacturers? If I were plundered of my
possessions, it would be but a sorry consolation to be told that an infant
had done it. Certainly I should not approve a policy which looked to the
increase of the strength and plundering capacity of the infant. I should be
apt to say, he may be an infant in years, but he is a giant in strength.
Hercules, when he strangled the serpents and vanquished the Nemean lion,
was an infant, but among serpents and lions an exceedingly dangerous and
uncomfortable infant ; and had it been left to the vote of the serpents and
the lions, I doubt not there would have been a unanimous expression of
opinion against their being compelled to contribute to the increase of his
strength on the ground of his infancy. In all those essentials which ordi
narily characterize infancy, have our manufacturing interests any of the
marks of infancy about them? If their present pecuniary strength and power
is infancy, God deliver us from their youth and their manhood! Abun
dantly able to go alone, I insist that they now shall go alone, and that neither
the government shall of itself help them, nor compel me to help them.
"But the laborer himself is not assisted by a protective tariff. The pro
prietor derives all the benefits from it, and the profits all go to him. Not
only that, but protection is the ultimate ruin of our manufactures. It stimu
lates an unnatural and artificial production ; it withdraws capital and labor
from pursuits in which they are naturally employed, and, under a delusive
prospect of larger profits, inveigles them into the protected manufacture or
pursuit. Thus an extortionate tariff upon iron will greatly stimulate its pro
duction until the market is glutted, and ruin follows. Cotton mills are even
now closed. The tariff on wool led thousands into wool-growing who would
not otherwise have engaged in it, and the wool-grower now knows that, so
far from conferring any substantial benefits upon him, the protective tariff
is a delusion and a snare.
"It ruins the inventive genius of the people, by rendering its exercise
unnecessary. In the affairs of this world, skill must meet skill. Natural
obstacles in the way of competition must be overcome by greater ingenuity
in mechanical appliances. The manufacturer of pig iron can slumber and
run his mills upon the old plans, and by the old methods of machinery.
The bounties which the government compels the public to pay him render
it unnecessary for htm to do more than to suffer things to run as they are.
A SPEECH ON FREE TRADE, l8/O. 245
When necessity drove the inventive genius of the people in that direction,
the sewing machine was one of its results, and with those machines we now
supply the world. Our vast fields presented, for the reaping of our grains,
the preparation of the soil, planting of the seeds, and the harvesting of the
ripened crops, new problems ; and, turned by necessity in those directions,
the genius of the people brought forth the patent drill, the reaper, the
thresher, the cultivator, and the harvester. Without a navy when the
rebellion began, and with three thousand miles of sea coast to blockade, the
necessities of the situation turned in that direction the inventive genius of
the people, and one bright morning at Hampton Roads the sudden offspring
of that ingenuity, the Monitor, revolutionized the naval architecture of the
world, and rendered the old wooden walls as useless and as worthless as
mere fabrics of pasteboard.
"Let us not distrust ourselves. The shoemakers of Lynn need no protec
tion. The wonderful skill of their machinery places foreign competition out
of the question. Open the door to competition. Let it be known that in
any branch of industry there is a necessity that American ingenuity should
exhibit itself, and it will certainly do so. In its presence, all natural diffi
culties and obstacles will be overcome, and it will assuredly triumph.
"Protection destroys our carrying trade, and thereby drives our vessels
from the seas. I have already shown that, as a regular pursuit, ship-building
in this country has substantially ceased. The tariffs upon the materials
which enter into the construction of a ship are so enormous, and the cost
is thereby so greatly enhanced, that competition with the foreign ship-builders
is simply impossible. But the trouble does not cease here. Before the tariff,
a large and profitable trade was carried on with South American ports,
where our calico and sheetings, and other products of our labor, were
exchanged for their wools. This trade gave employment to the ship-builder
and ship owner, and to the sailor. It opened a market for our own pro
ducts, and gave thereby employment to our own labor. Our own wares
were sold at profitable prices. We were supplied with cheap and fine wools.
Every one was benefited. But the protective tariff laid its hand upon wool,
and all these interests perished as if they had been blighted with a mildew.
On the shores of the Mediterranean, the Almighty has seen fit to confer
warmer suns and more genial heats than shine upon the salt marshes of
Syracuse or Saginaw. Congress has sought to correct this order of Provi
dence, and to protect the Onondaga and the Saginaw salt, manufactured by
mechanical heats and appliances, against that perfected by the cheaper
agencies of solar heat. We bring in our vessels no more salt from the
shores and the Islands of the Mediterranean. We get poorer salt, and at
a higher price, than formerly ; but be assured, Providence will win.
"Even though their culture be protected by an Act of Congress, oranges
will not grow so luxuriantly in Vermont as in Portugal. The sun still shines
as warm in Southern Europe, and as coyly and as coldly in New York and
Michigan, as before Congress undertook to decree that it should be other
wise ; and the benefits and blessings of God's sunshine we must have, come
from whatever source they may.
.y
246 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
" We have an enormous tariff on coal. As well might you attempt to
impose a tax upon one of the elemental forces of nature as upon coal. It
is the power which moves all our machinery, and the use of which enters
directly or indirectly into every article of human wants, necessities, comforts,
or luxuries. Yet we are obliged to pay tribute for the use of that power
which drives our machinery, and which heats our houses. As well might
you tax the sunshine. The tariff on iron not only enhances the price of
every article into which it enters and which we are obliged to use/ but it
swallows up the hard labor of the farmer in the cost of transportation of his
products to a market. The cost of railroad construction is thereby enhanced,
and an advance in rates of transportation follows as a necessity. In its
practical operations, our present tariff is simply a nuisance. Of about
4000 articles subject to the tariff, twenty furnish half the revenue, and the
balance are purely mischievous.
' ' A gentleman of the name of Spaulding prepares glue and sells it for a
good price under the name of ' Spaulding' s Prepared Glue.' His is Ameri
can industry, and hence is protected. Last year the government received
by way of revenue from the tariff on glue the magnificent sum of seventeen dol
lars. Our hens are protected ; and in 1868 the government received $6.90
from .duties on ostrich eggs ; and yet I believe that, even thus protected the
native hen will never succeed — so far at least as the size of the egg is con
cerned — in competition with the ostrich. Sauer Kraut is protected, and the
protection yielded a revenue to the government of six dollars. Apple sauce
is also protected, and in 1868 yielded a revenue to the government of
three hundred dollars. We are also protected against Spainish flies and
Brazilian bugs. Our native flies and bugs are in their infancy, and must be
protected.
"Finally, what is a tariff? It is a tax. It is nothing less than, and
nothing but, a tax. It is a tax which we do not pay to the government
but to the manufacturer for his private enrichment ; for where protection
begins revenue ceases. The consumer is impoverished, the government is
not aided. Shall this system be continued? The question wejnust answer.
We may dodge it and evade it for a time ; but the millions of men who pro
tected the nation in the hour of its sore peril and with their lives demand that
this question be answered. I am, for myself, prepared to answer it. My
answer is : Our soil is free, our men are free, our thought is free, our speech
is free, our trade shall be free."
CHAPTER XV.
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1872.
THE "LIBERAL REPUBLICANS" AND THE CINCINNATI CONVENTION — STATE
CONVENTION OF ILLINOIS — MR. STORRS, AT SPRINGFIELD, REVIEWS THE
SITUATION— CIVIL SERVICE REFORM— REVENUE REFORM — THE TARIFF —
THE NATIONAL DEBT — RESUMPTION OF SPECIE PAYMENTS — THE PHILADEL
PHIA CONVENTION — SPEECH AT OTTAWA, ILLINOIS — THE CRADLE OF THE
REPUBLICAN PARTY — GRANT'S RECORD — TRENCHANT REVIEW OF THE
RECORD OF HORACE GREELEY— THE ONE TERM PRINCIPLE — SPEECH AT
FREEPORT, ILLINOIS — COMPARISON OF THE' " LIBERAL " AND REPUBLICAN
PLATFORMS — GREELEY AND LINCOLN — SPEECH AS DIXON, ILLINOIS — THE
CONGREGATION DISMISS THE CHOIR — GREELEY'S FAMOUS PLAN FOR THE
RESUMPTION OF SPECIE PAYMENTS — THE KU-KLUX AND ENFORCEMENT BILLS
— SPEECH AT INDIANAPOLIS — SCRIPTURE ILLUSTRATIONS — THE CONVERSION
OF SAUL — PARABLE OF THE UNJUST STEWARD — SPEECHES AT READING, PA.,
AND OTHER EASTERN CITIES.
T T 7HOEVER," says Senator Howe, in his article in the
Y V North American Review for June 1878, "shall look
back out "of the next generation and shall count up the number
of renegade Republicans who congregated at Cincinnati in 1872
as candidates for President, — all shouting for reform; all vocifera
ting against Republican rascality; each led by a little faction of
soreheads, desperate and reckless, ready to stake their last politi
cal hope on the success of their favorite; not one thinking to be
elected by the party represented at Cincinnati, but each expecting
to be backed by the party which subsequently assembled at
Baltimore, — will not fail to estimate that stupendous sham at its
true value."
One meritorious quality the bitterest enemies of Mr. Storrs
never could deny him, nor refuse to acknowledge to its full
247
248 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
extent, — he always had, in political and in professional life, "the
courage of his opinions." He always said the thing he meant,
and took care that there should be no doubt as to where he
stood, whether before a political audience or a judicial forum.
From his earliest years, he had been a believer in the political
doctrines which took ultimate shape in the organization of the
Republican party; and from that creed he never swerved to the
latest day of his life. Long before the word "Stalwart" was
imported into political discussion, he was one ; the very incarna
tion of political consistency, and the opponent of any course
looking to mere temporary expediency. His watchword was
" Principle." Concessions to the disorderly element at the South,
known as the " Ku-Klux," were abhorrent to him. Thoroughly
learned in ,the history of English constitutional law, he knew
that peace and order could only be preserved in the Southern
States by means of the reconstruction measures of General
Grant's administration ; and that any truckling to the ruffians
who drove negroes from the polls, and shot down white men
suspected of sympathy with the negro in respect to his civil
rights, was mere cowardice, and sure to end in defeating the
action of Congress on behalf of that Oppressed race. When,
therefore, a number of disaffected Republicans, headed by Carl
Schurz and others, organized an opposition to General Grant's
re-election because of his Southern policy, and on other grounds,
Mr. Storrs came to the front, and although the disastrous fire of
1871 had inflicted damage on him compared with which the
larger losses of merchants were to them but small, he laid aside
all thought of professional emolument, and threw himself heart
and soul into the cause for the success of which all patriotic
citizens of the United States then were hoping with bated
breath.
The disaffected Republicans were joined by some who had
left the ranks when Andrew Johnson was impeached, who had
since then affiliated with the Democrats, and who now hoped to
return to place and power by the help of the Democrats, with
whom they expected to form a coalition. They held a conven
tion at Cincinnati on the first day of May, 1872, and nominated
for President, Horace Greeley, editor of the New York Tribune ;
and for Vice President, B. Gratz Brown, editor of a paper published
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 8/2. 249
in a country town in the State of Missouri. The loyal Republi.
cans were in favor of honoring General Grant with a second term.
The Republican Convention of the State of Illinois met at
Springfield towards the end of May. " Never in the history of
the Republican party," says the report of a Chicago paper " has
there been such a spontaneous assembling of the people at a
State convention. The Cincinnati movement has only had the
effect to spur up the Republicans of the State to a sense of
their duty to party and principle, and the people are here by
thousands to show their fidelity to the party of liberty, civiliza
tion, and progress." A mass meeting was held in the hall of
the House of Representatives the night before the opening of
the Convention, and Mr. Storrs, who was there as a delegate,
struck the key note of the campaign in a vigorous address. The
first sentences that he uttered evoked an enthusiasm which was
sustained to the end. He began by saying :
" It is quite evident from what I see before me here to-night, that the
Republicans of the State of Illinois have but little thought of abandoning
their party colors, or of deserting that glorious political organization which
for fifteen years of our past history has represented the purest patriotism,
the best thought and the highest impulses of the country. Coming together
from every portion of the State to take counsel with each other, we have
found, I have been delighted to note, that in our ranks there is no faltering,
and that no appeals to merely personal prejudices, no platforms which have
their foundation on mere personal grievances, can swerve the old party of
the Union a hair's breadth from its course.
"A year ago the Democratic party, tired and heart-sick at over ten years
of continuous defeats, took what they called "a new departure." How
dismal a failure they made of it I will not distress them nor weary you by
repeating. We have had for several years in our own party many very
excellent gentlemen who, wearied with success, and finding that the Demo
cratic "new departure" was a failure, have undertaken to get up one of
their own, and ask the Republican party to join with them. The experi
ment which the Democracy tried was an entirely safe one, for however it
might result, it was impossible that their condition should be any worse
than it was. They could lose nothing by failure, and therefore it was
entirely safe to try. But we are very differently situated. It is very
doubtful whether our condition could be improved by the success of such
an experiment, while it is entirely certain that it would be seriously dam
aged by a failure. As a matter of common prudence, I object to any
Republican new departure. We started right 'at the outset. We have been
going right ever since. We have reached the haven of success and victory
at the end of each trip. A new departure would probably land us in
25O LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
another port, and whoever leaves our craft, to adopt the Democratic style
of navigation, will wind up by becoming one of them, for new departure
will land him where theirs landed them, on the bleak and desolate shores of
political defeat and disappointment.
"I fail to see any good reason why I should leave the Republican party.
I fail to see why the party itself should be dissolved. If for nothing more
than what it has done, we should be loth to desert it, and least of all should
we leave it until we can find some organization which will suit us better."
He then appealed to the past record of the Republican party,
and contended that the interests of the country would be safest
in their hands.
"While I do not believe that a political party can always safely trust
itself to its past achievements, yet it is true nevertheless that we may fairly
assume what course it will pursue in the future from what its course and
policy have been in the past. It is precisely in this way that we have, for
years gone, judged the Democratic party, and however splendid their pro
mises may have been, we have because their history has been against them,
utterly lacked faith either in their ability or willingness to perform them.
"From the earliest period in its history down to the present day, the
Republican party has been the only party of genuine progress and reform
which the country has known. It has also made this character by fidelity
to its promises.
"It agreed at the outset to protect our territories from the encroachments
of slavery. It performed its agreement, and rescuing them from the grasp
of the slave power, dedicated them to free labor forever.
'•It agreed to preserve the Union itself and, how nobly that promise was
kept the world now knows by heart.
"It promised, as the result of its victories against rebellion, freedom to the
slave — and in performance of that promise, it at one blow struck the shackles
from four millions of slaves, and lifted them from the degradation of human
chattel hood into the dignity of American citizenship.
"It agreed to protect the negro in all the rights of a free man, and in
performance of that promise made him a citizen and a voter.
" It agreed in 1868 to preserve the national credit, and to-day hundreds
of millions of our debt have been paid in the faithful performance of that
promise.
"It agreed to remove, as rapidly as the public safety would permit, all
disabilities which were imposed upon the people of the seceding States, and
gradually they have been removed, and before this administration shall
have closed they will have ceased to exist altogether.
"It has done all that it has agreed to do, and all that the people required
that it should do.
"For the first time in the history of this country a political party has
crystalized all its political ideas into laws. Its platforms are now on the
statue-book, or imbedded in the Constitution. The Republican platform of
to-day becomes the law of the land to-morrow. It deals in no abstractions,
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 8/2. 25!
but its theories one hour are parts in our history the next. And because it
has thus rapidly reduced its theory to practice, because it has performed all
that it has promised, because its engagements are all fulfilled, we are
assured that its work is done, its mission ended.
"But complaint is made that it has no new policy to propose; that the
country requires, now that the war has ended, a line of policy looking
solely to the conditions of peace, and that the Republican party has failed
to furnish it. On this basis a new party has been organized, called the
Liberal Republicans. Why they are thus called, I shall presently under
take to show: We are all invited to abandon the old organization, to throw
General Grant overboard ; but before accepting such invitation, I desire to
know what new line of policy this new party proposes ; what measures it
favors which are not already adopted by the Republican party."
He proceeded to review the issues upon which the Cincinnati
party based their platform. In his -last message, President Grant
had recommended the removal of the disabilities imposed by the
fourteenth amendment, and Congress had taken action on the
subject, so that "general amnesty" was likely soon to be made a
dead issue.
On the question of civil service reform, about which a great
clamor was made at Cincinnati, Mr. Storrs again referred to the
message of President Grant, advising a reform of the civil service,
and announcing that he had appointed a commission to devise
rules and regulations for the purpose. "Their labors," said Gen
eral Grant, "are not yet complete; but it is believed that they
will succeed in devising a plan that can be adopted, to the great
relief of the Executive, the heads of departments, and members
of Congress, and which -will redound to the true interest of the
public service. At all events the experiment shall have a fair
trial."
"He appointed on that commission Joseph Medill, one of the editors of
the Chicago Tribune, when the Chicago Tribune was a Republican paper —
a true and able man ; Geo. W. Curtis, one of the most cultivated and trust
worthy men in the country ; ex-Senator Cattell, of New Jersey, and a South
ern gentleman of equal prominence. His desire to give this civil service
reform a fair trial was demonstrated by the character of the men whom he
appointed, each and every one of whom was know to be in favor of the
experiment. Rules were established by those Commissioners. The President
has acted in hearty accord with them, and Congress has appropriated £25,
ooo — all that was asked by the Commissioners — for the purpose of carrying
their schemes into operation."
What more did the new party want?
"Is it Revenue Reform? They have just nominated for President the
252 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
most bigoted, insane and absurd protectionist in the country, and have
openly and conspicuously abandoned that question as an issue in national
politics by remitting it to the people of the Congressional districts. Is it a
reduction of the tariff which they desire? We need organize no new party
on that basis, for Congress is now reducing the tariff at least fifty millions
of dollars. Is it the payment of the national debt? The Republican party
is paying it at the rate of one hundred millions of dollars per year. Do
they wish it paid more rapidly? They dare not say so. Is it the resump
tion of specie payments? We are all in favor of that, and only differ in the
manner in which specie payments shall be resumed. Greeley says, ' the
way to resume is to resume." Is that the policy of the Liberal party. They
have no plan. They dare not name one. Are they for the continuance of the
national banks or against them? They have not answered; they dare not
answer. Is it for the further reduction of the army and navy? They have
not said. Our army is not now a decent police force. Our navy is notori
ously inadequate to the wants of the government. Do they propose to
reduce them still further? They dare not say so, and the people demand
an increase rather than a diminuation of our naval strength. Is the new
party founded upon the ground of opposition to land grants to railroad
companies? On this question they occupy the same ground that we do, and
Greeley has always been the advocate of these grants. Is it for the reduc
tion of taxes? The Republican party is fast reducing them by seventy-five
million dollars, having previously immensely reduced them. Is it for settling
our foreign quarrels by peaceful arbitration? That is precisely what, for the
first time in the history of our politics, we are doing. The Alabama claims
we propose to settle by arbitration. We shall thus settle them. Before the
election has arrived they will be a 'dead issue."1
The proceedings of the Cincinnati Convention were subjected
to a scathing criticism.
"The shame of that convention was in this; they were harmonious on
questions of principle on which their differences were irreconcilable, and they
were irreconcilable on mere questions of personal preferment which involved
no principles whatever.
"They were agreed where agreement was shameful. They differed where
differences were contemptible. Thus, Greeley and Horace White agreed on
the tariff — where it was impossible that they should honestly agree. They
differed as to candidates, where, if their party has been organized on prin
ciple, a disagreement would have been equally shameful. They surrendered
principles to which they should have unfalteringly adhered, irrespective of men
or personal prejudices. They clung to personal prejudices, which they should
have at once surrendered if their party had been one of principle. Thejr
harmony was disgraceful, because it was the price of the surrender of prin
ciple. Their differences were contemptible, because they were quarrels
merely about men. It is the first instance in the history of our politics,
where a new party signalizes its entry into public life by the open and
undisguised sale and abandonment of the idea which called it into being.
" But this convention met. It fairly organized on Sunday. If it had car-
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 8/2. 253
ried no other baggage than its principles it would have been the most har
monious convention that the world has ever seen. P^or on that first day of
conference, protectionists avowed their willingness to go for free trade and,
revenue reformers avowed their willingness to go for protection — all in the
interests of reform. When Horace Greeley and David A. Wells met harmo
niously on the question of the tariff, we might well expect that the lion and
the lamb were prepared to lie down together.
" Republicans who had not voted our ticket since 1864, Republicans like
Swett and Norton, who had 'swung around the circle' with Johnson, and
who had voted the Democratic ticket ever since, were there to ' reform' the
Republican party.
"At the outset the foundation stone of the party was rudely torn away.
The doctrine of revenue reform was incontinently abandoned. General
platitudes as to civil service reform were substituted in place of any well
defined plan. Adams and Trumbull and Davis went to pieces, and under
the influence of the most wicked, corrupt and unscrupulous combination
known in our politics, every idea of reform upon which this new party was
organized was shamelessly abandoned, and at the bidding of Frank Blair
and the vilest carpet-baggers of the South, united with the dirty adherents
of the Tammany Ring of New York City — Hank Smith and Waldo Hutchins, •
of New York — the weak tool of them all, Horace Greeley, was nominated
for President. The spirit of that convention was against protection. Yet
Horace Greeley is the incarnation of all the errors that there are in that
system, and he is their candidate.
' 'The convention declared against the course of Congress in its legislation
against the South. Yet Horace Greeley always has been, and is to-day, the
steady advocate of Ku-Klux legislation. The platform and their candidate are
irreconcilable. One nullifies the other, and this convention, while seeking to
organize a new party, barters its principles at the outset, claims the support of
Republicans for the only man in their party who has ever openly advocated
the right of secession, and slanders the memory of one dear to the heart
of every true Republican, Abraham Lincoln.
"This convention met for the purpose of inaugurating a reform in the
revenue. The idea of its promoters was that a tariff for protection, was a
fraud upon the interests of the people. I give them credit for desiring pre
cisely what they said they desired. I do not charge. It is not necessary that I
should claim that at the outset they were actuated by merely personal motives.
I take their own professions, and I find what the truth of history bears me
out in saying, that a more shameless abandonment of principle than was
exhibited at the Cincinnati Convention was never seen in the political history
of this country. They have abandoned the fundamental idea upon which
their political structure was rested. Seeking to disrupt the Republican party
on the tariff question, they have quietly and contentedly left the question
where the Republican party has always been willing to submit it, to the
will of the majority in each Congressional district.
"But the result of that convention demonstrates better than any words*
that I can possibly employ, that the convention itself was a fraud, that it
254 LIFE OF EMERY A- STORKS.
was based upon no principle, that it was not a union of men thinking
alike upon political questons, but a coalition of men who had nothing in
common except personal grievances and disappointments.
"Many men of our own party lent the strength of their names to the call
for 'that convention, on the supposition that a reform of the revenue was
honestly intended. In this State, hundreds of men thought that a protective
tariff was unjust, and therefore joined the so-called reformers. These were
men of principle. Toward them I have no words of fault-finding to apply.
But when in pursuit of principle they find their doctrine shamelessly bar
tered away, and political tricksters, demagogues and dead-beats like Frank
Blair and Gratz Brown trading on their convictions, and nominating as a
candidate for the Presidency the man who of all others belies their opinions
upon this question, it is time for them to inquire whether it is not safer to
come back to the old party, which never professes what it does not believe,
which always performs what it promises, and which plays no tricks upon
its followers.
"The Cincinnati Convention claims to be in favor of civil service reform.
But how it will reform the civil service it does not vouchsafe to tell us.
Will it elect postmasters by the people? This is Senator Trumbull's doctrine.
* But a more Quixotic and absurd scheme was never broached in our politics.
To what extent will they apply the doctrine of competitive examination?
The sages of the party do not care to tell us, and the Chicago Tribune
openly avows that, in the event of the election of Greeley, all those who dif
fer with him in political opinion will at once be removed from office. Their
platform is clamorous — eloquent over the sufferings of the South. But what
remedy do they propose to apply? The fifteenth constitutional amendment
confers the right of suffrage upon the liberated slave. Do they seek to
remove that? No political disabilities, so far as voting is concerned, are
visited upon the rebellious whites. Do they seek to change that condition of
things? The present Congress will remove all disabilities, so far as the hold
ing of office is concerned. They cannot hasten that ; and, once done, that
is a dead issue. Do they object to what is called the Ku-Klux legislation?
I need not pause to argue its justice or its injustice; their candidate for
President has favored it from the beginning; and no one has complained
that the extraordinary powers with which Congress has clothed him have
been exercised by General Grant otherwise than wisely and well.
"Bitterly opposed to a protective tariff, the Liberal Republicans, so self-
styled, have selected as their standard-bearer and their leader the most
prominent and conspicuous opponent of their doctrine in the whole country.
Opposed, or professing to be, with equal bitterness to the legislation of
Congress with regard to the Ku-Klux, they have nominated the principal
leader of the movement in favor of that legislation.
" Despite his two thousand followers from the State of Illinois, Davis had
no show in the convention. Trumbull faded out of sight after the third bal
lot. Adams, with all his respectability, went to pieces before the persuasive
arguments of 'Hank Smith,' and through the most barefaced and shameless
trick ever seen in a political convention — a trick so dirty that it would have
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 8/2. 255
utterly ruined any nominee of any party accountable to anybody — the
Reformers bound their necks to Tammany. Tweed triumphed and Greeley
was nominated for President of the United States.
"It was impossible to tell who was the most disappointed at this result.
Such a unanimity of mourning was never before seen. Davis and Trum-
bull and Adams and their adherents had quarreled for a week, but when
the convention closed 'a fellow feeling made them wondrous kind.' In a
common brotherhood of woe they forgot their warfare in their common
griefs. Never before was lightning so impartial. No one was skipped.
Swett and White and Schurz and Adams were all hit at the same time and
about in the same place, and the bolt was destructive to them all. What
ever differences there might have been in life, death, the great leveler,
made them all equal, and they have made a happy community of political
defuncts ever since, and thus the Reform movement which promised so
much, and vaunted itself so loudly, went to pieces. An attempt to organize
a great national party on the basis of mutual antipathies and hatreds, on a
platform of common grievances and disappointments, met, as it deserved to
meet, a disgraceful and wretched failure. Their professions of principle, as
the result sho\ved, were a sham. They were agreed in nothing except hatred
and jealousy of the administration, which found its expression in the miser
able phrase, 'any body to beat Grant;' and as old as this common plat
form was, it might have met with some show of success had they not hated
each other worse than either hated the President."
The concluding part of the speech was devoted to a review
of Horace Greeley's unpatriotic course during the war, and an
appeal to those good Republicans who had been seduced away
by delusive promises about revenue reform to return to the
ranks. As Mr. Storrs in subsequent speeches put this part of
his argument in terser form, it is here omitted.
" The Republican mansion," he closed by saying, " is spacious
enough to accommodate every Democrat who would like to join
it. Thousands and tens of thousands of them are with us now
and have been for years. We expect that thousands and tens
of thousands more will take shelter under our roof. The build
ing is strong enough and big enough to accommodate them all.
The rains no longer beat into it; the winds no longer whistle
through it; the storm no longer rocks it, for we have removed
from it the decaying timbers of human chattelhood. and
replaced them with the everlasting granite of universal freedom."
The first campaign speech that Mr. Storrs made after the
National Convention was delivered at Ottawa, Illinois, in the last
week of June. He spoke from the bench of the Circuit Court,
and humorously alluded 'to his occupying there for the first time
something like a judicial position. He said :
256 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
" I have always spoken here as an advocate. I have addressed the great
constituency of big-hearted, broad-browed Republicans of La Salle county as
an advocate ; as the advocate of a great party, which it is pretty well dem
onstrated is as strong to-day as it has ever been; a party whose fires are
burning as brightly, whose spirit is just as high, and whose purpose is just
as resolute, as when in 1854 it first grappled with the aggressions of the
slave power, and when, in 1860, it triumphed upon the election of Abraham
Lincoln to the Presidency.
"I see nothing in the contest now impending which is particularly new.
It seems to me that although some of the details may be changed, yet at
the same time we are waging the same fight, and against the same old
enemy. [Cheers. J I have been pleased to meet with so many of the
Republicans of La Salle county, as I have seen to-day in their county con
vention assembled. I come here, telling you, as far as the spirit of the
party is concerned, precisely what you already know ; that whoever con
cludes in his own mind that the mission of the Republican party is ended,
that its work is done, or that its labor is in any degree finished, is entirely
and altogether in a mistake. It has a future before it, I think, just as proud
and noble as the past of its career and history. It is a party which, if
there was nothing more to be said about it than what it has done in the
interests of good government and of this people, I should feel very loth to
desert ; and least of all can I come to the conclusion that it is worth while
for me to abandon the Republican party because I find here and there a
few men, — men with grievances, men 'with a mission,' men who call
themselves self-appointed leaders of this great movement, — least of all, I say,
can I find it in my heart to abandon this great political organization, the
grandest, in my judgment, that the history of this world has ever recorded.
" Mr. Sumner, in a recent speech which he made in the Senate of the
United States, declares substantially that he was the father of this great
party, that the credit of its paternity belongs to him, and that its cradle was
in the city of Boston. I have this to say with regard to our party that is
peculiar to it, in the fullest sense of that term, the Republican party never
had a leader ; it has not got a leader to-day ; it will never have a leader.
The Republican party was made up from the start of independent men,
thinking each man for himself and on his individual hook ; and the rank
and file of the party never followed one single step after the leadership of
any man, where that man, essaying to be its leader, did not go in the di
rection which the Republican party desired to go. It has never had a series
of platforms written for it and dictated to it by a convention ; the platforms
of the Republican party have always been written in the hearts of the rank
and file long before they had been inscribed upon the records of the conven
tion. The rank and file have given law to conventions, and they have
never received the law from conventions. Republicans can go to sleep at
night perfectly well assured of what their principles will be the next night,
although- a convention should in the meantime assemble. But how has it
been, — how is it to-day — with the Democratic party of the country? The
Democrat goes to bed to-night in favor of revenue reform ; and he retires
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 8/2. 257
to bed to-morrow night in favor of a high protective tariff. [Laughter.] He
does it because he has found in the meantime a Convention has assembled,
which tell him what he must believe, and what he must not believe. Mr.
Sumner talks about the leaders of this great party. -I say this to Mr. Sum-
ner upon that point, that if he has any doubt about it, I would like to have
him and any other ambitious man look up and down that great track of
light which the pathway of the Republican party makes all across this con
tinent, and he will see all along the line of its march that its course is
strewn with the carcasses of its self-appointed leaders. We have thrown
them overboard, one after another, and one after another, regretting, per
haps, the necessity of our doing so, but at the same time, that fact, that we
have disposed of a leader, never has for a single instant impeded the pro
gress of that great political organization. I recollect, in 1866, when I had
the honor of addressing the Republicans of La Salle county in this place,
that we had thrown overboard a whole cargo of leaders, a President and
Cabinet ; and it operated upon the party like a tonic, and we were stronger
and clearer-headed for the exercise. I tell Mr. Sumner, — and as speaking
for the rank and file we may all tell him, and all others similarly disposed, —
that the will of that great party is infinitely stronger than all the influence
that all its leaders ever exercised. It is a vain thing, and a weak and idle
thing for them to attempt to resist it. Mr. Sumner claims its paternity. It
was an old doctrine of the heathen that the father should have the right
under the law to kill his children ; perhaps it is on this basis that Mr. Sum
ner claims the fathership of the Republican party. My fellow citizens, no
man was the father of the Republican party. No set of men were the
fathers of the Republican party. The Republican party, like Topsy, 'bore
itself.' It was the result of circumstances. All the leaders in the country
could not have hurried its birth one single instant. All the politicians on
the top of God's green earth could not have retarded it one single moment.
Slavery had made aggressions on our territory ; the Democratic party were
in favor of it, and the old Whigs did not oppose it ; therefore the people,
finding in the existing parties no expression of their sentiments, organized a party
for themselves. You might as well say that when the earth has been parched
and dry foe weeks, and we see great black clouds moving up in the west,
coming speedier and speedier towards the zenith, suppose that Mr. Charles
Sumner should stand ofT, just as the cloud reaches us, and say, ' I order
it to rain ; ' and afterwards it does rain ; and ten years after, when we are
felicitating ourselves on the refreshing effects of that shower, Charles Sum
ner says, ' I was the author of that rain ; I was the father of that shower !
I told you, didn't I say, Let it rain, and didn't it rain?' 'Oh,' we say
back to Mr. Sumner,- 'the cloud was rising, and your little hand could not
stop it ; it was charged with moisture ; the earth was dry ; and God Al
mighty, that made great natural laws, made it rain, and you are altogether
an insignificant trifle in his hands.' Mr. Sumner bring on that tremendous
storm that in 1854 swept over this whole country like a whirlwind! Why,
he would have been borne on the wings of that wind as easily as ever a
feather was floated on the breeze. If he or anybody else had undertaken
17
258 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
to stop it, they had better have been in a boat of stone, with sails of lead,
and oars of iron, the wrath of God for a gale, and hell the nearest port!*
"He the father of the Republican party! He has given his dates, and
says the iQth of September, 1854; he christened it, at Boston. He quotes
his words, where he used the word ' Republican' as applying to this great
organization, and claims that that was the first instance where it was used.
" If any place was the cradle of the Republican party, that place was
Ottawa, Illinois. If any man was the father of the Republican party, that
man was E. S. Leland, for, sixty days before Charles Sumner made
his speech in Boston, Judge E. S. Leland made a speech from these very
steps, and introduced a series of resolutions in which he proclaimed the will
of the people of Illinois, and named that great organization the Republican
party of America. If the honor is anywhere, that is where it belongs.
[Loud applause.] If we are to have history of this business, let history
tell the truth. I do not know whether Judge Leland was ahead of every
body else or not. He was two months ahead of Charles Sumner ; and in
the meantime the party had grown so strong and so powerful that the uses
and purposes of Charles Sumner, even as wet nurse, might with entire safety
have been dispensed with."
He then answered the " liberal" objections to the administra
tion of affairs by the Republican party, as he had done in his
Springfield speech, and proceeded to dispose of Mr. Sumner's
objections to General Grant.
"What is it they want? What is it the Republican party of this country
will not give that the people demand, and that this 'Liberal party' will
give? Is it revenue reform? They swapped that off the first day of their
convention. [Laughter.] Meeting there in Cincinnati, the first day of May,
never before was such a convention seen. Men of honest purpose, high
integrity and strong zeal in the public interest, I admit were there. But if
there was one single principle upon which that Liberal Republican party
*In 1880, when Mr. Storrs was stumping New York State for Garfield and
Arthur, he again made use of this metaphor, as he was in the habit of using
over again an image or an illustration that had once impressed his mind as
being particularly happy or appropriate. A New York reporter remembered
hearing the Rev. Dr. Talmage use the same metaphor in a sermon preached
by him in 1878 at his Tabernacle, and, exulting in his half knowledge,
charged Mr. Storrs with plagiarism from Talmage. A spirited newspaper
controversy ensued. One correspondent of a Chicago paper asseverated that
in conversation with a veteran Chicago journalist, the latter quoted to him
this very sentence, and said he remembered hearing Mr. Storrs utter it dur
ing the campaign of 1868. At all events, here it is, clearly eneugh, in his
speech as far back as 1872. The point is of trifling importance, but much
was made of it in the New York papers at the time. If there was any pla
giarism, it was not Storrs that borrowed from Talmage, but Talmage that
appropriated from Storrs. Nobody who ever heard Mr. Storrs speak would
dream of accusing him seriously of want of originality. While the contro
versy was waging, Mr. Storrs quietly laughed over it, and only said, — "A
man may surely plagiarize from himself."
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 8/2. 259
was founded, it was that of revenue reform. Men went there with an
assorted lot of protection theories, and other men went there with an
assorted lot of free trade theories, and how they swapped and dickered and
exchanged them the world knows, and their platform exhibits. They
agreed where their differences of opinion were irreconcilable ; they disagreed
about men where they ought not to have disagreed at all, and they agreed
on principles where they thought it was disgraceful to be harmonious ; and
thus that Convention, swapping off its foundation plank at the outset, closed
in the most inscrutably curious way, and nominated Horace Greeley for
President of the United States. . . . And then the great leader of the move
ment, we are told by Mr. Samuel Bowles, Mr. Carl Schurz, 'overcome,' he
said, 'and discouraged,1 retired to the house of Judge Stallo, and there, as
Mr. Bowles says, overwhelmed with grief, disheartened and bowed down
in spirit, no one able to speak to him because the weight of his mighty
grief was altogether too great, turned to the piano, put his master fingers
on the keys of the instrument, and poured out his feelings in one of Auber's
melancholy pieces of music ; and the eyes of the whole company were
bathed in tears. Was ever anything so pathetic? 'Rock me to sleep,
mother!' [Laughter and cheers.]
"Great objections are made to General Grant, but I prefer going to the
people, — to the rank and file, and judging General Grant precisely accord
ing to his results, and what he has achieved. Men come to me with pallid
faces and with trembling nerves and say, 'Great God, this country is all
going to pieces!' Says I, 'What's th& matter?' 'Why, Grant has been
four weeks at Long Branch ! ' Perhaps he has ; I am disposed to be
candid ; he has been there ; but, my fellow-citizens, let us treat Grant as we
treat everybody else, not better, and no worse. Give him credit for what
he has done, and charge him for his defaults. Keep the books as you
please, either in double or single entry, and how will it figure up? Charge
him with four weeks at Long Branch, but give him credit for four weeks
at Vicksburg. Charge him with three days behind a trotting horse at
Central Park, but give him credit for a week at Chattanooga. Charge him
with a week at Chicago, but give credit for a week at Fort Donelson.
Charge him with a trip into Pennsylvania, but give him credit for Appom-
mattox. Go and charge it all up; there is enough of patriotic achievement
still left to the credit of General Grant to stop the mouths of all the liberal
parties that the sun will ever shine upon. [Loud applause.]
"Mr. Sumner, in his essay in the Senate, says that a military man never has
made a successful civilian. He cites history to prove it; and if Charles is
great in anything, he is great in his history. He cites the cases of Freder
ick the Great, the Duke of Marlborough, and the Duke of Wellington. His
proposition is that a great military chieftan must of necessity and for that reason
be a failure in civil life; and he cites these three cases. In the first place,
suppose I admit his instances are in point, his logic is bad. The instances
are not sufficiently numerous ; you cannot prove a general rule by three
instances. I put against him William the Silent, Oliver Cromwell, and
George Washington; and Charles Sumner' s illustrations are all gone to pieces.
26O LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
My illustrations are as many as his, and prove just as much as his do. But
they are not in point. Frederick the Great was the greatest civil leader the
Prussian nation ever had ; it is to him their system of education is due.
What was the matter with the Duke of Marlborough ? A great military
chieftain, it is true ; a wonderful success in that capacity, and a failure as a
civilian ; Why ? Did he fail as a civilian because he was a great military
man? no; he failed as a civilian because he could not stop in one party
thirty days at a time ; because he was more like a ' Liberal Republican ' than
any man that lived in the British Empire ; because in the morning he
attended a convention to keep in the reigning dynasty, and the same evening
he attended another convention to bring over the pretender. Marlborough
was great as a military man because he was like Grant ; he was a fizzle and
a dead failure as a civilian because he was like Schurz ; he was a failure as
a civilian because nobody could trust him and nobody would trust him. The
propositition amounts to this, that a great military man and a brave man is
a poor President, and therefore the converse of the proposition must be true
— that a poor General and a coward must be a good President. Therefore
I suppose they have nominated Horace Greeley. If that is so, he fills the
whole bill, and has all the accomplishments. [Laughter and cheers.]
"It is insisted that Grant can't make a speech. I think he can; for I
think the speeches that are going to be remembered in the history of this
world are not the mere words which we utter in halls like this, not the
mere essays which we write, but after all they are the deeds which men
do. The world, three thousand years ago, had forgotten all that the old
Egyptian had ever written about architecture, and all that the old Egyp
tian had ever said ; but there, on those desert plains of Egypt, stand those
mighty pyramids, witnesses for all time to come of what the old Egyptians
accomplished. We have all forgotten what John Brown said ; who remem
bers what John Brown wrote? Who will ever forget what John Brown did?
And while John Brown's body lies mouldering in the ground, ain't his
soul a-marching on? You may take, if you please, or let Mr. Sumner and
Mr. Schurz select for themselves, the greatest speeches that either of them
has ever made, write them in letters of living flame right against the whole
sky, and put by the side of them the single word ' Appomattox ' and behold,
how in that magnificent presence the flames of Charles Sumner' s speech will
pale their ineffectual fires. The world will never forget what U. S. Grant
has done ; the world will soon cease to remember what Charles Sumner has
said. I would detract nothing from the merits of that accomplished states
man ; I concede his magnificent endowments; I concede his wonderful,
acquirements ; but this great party of ours, which has, as I believe, the cus
tody of the interests of good government for all the years to come in its
hands, is infinitely better, and holier, and greater, and more valuable than
any man ; and much as I revere the name of Charles Sumner, I would see
him sink out of sight into utter forgetfulness, into the deepest oblivion,
rather than I would see one single star on the banner of this great party
pale its fires. For, think what it has done. In twelve short years of time
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 8/2. 26 1
it has eclipsed a thousand years of the most magnificent history that this
world has ever seen. It has taken four millions of chattels, and lifted them
from the night and barbarisms of slavery into the clear, pure atmosphere of
American citizenship. It has taken a chattel and made him a Senator. It
has taken personal property, and made it members of Congress. It is the
great, progressive party of mankind. I cannot sometimes but sympathize
with that conservative spirit that looks lovingly and affectionately back upon
the past; but while I sympathize with it I cannot go with it. I know the
picture that it has presented of the good old times when the slaveholder
ruled is a. pretty one; the slaveholder sitting like a patriarch, as they used
to tell us, with his broad-brim out on his piazza, and his little chattels, male
and female, dancing on the green before him. It is a pretty picture ; but
this is the one which the Republican party draws — no longer chattels, male
or female ; nothing, thank God, on this continent but free men and free
women ; by the mighty exertions of this great party, the architects of their
own fortunes. [Cheers.] You see no longer the negro child, boy and girl,
dancing upon the green ; you see them in the school-house, at the workshop,
at the bench, on the farm, each, thank God, his own master, each carving
out his own fortune for the future. There may be less poetry in it, but
how much more magnificent it is in the story it tells for our common
humanity ! How much more magnificent it is in the exalted and lofty
patriotism which it typifies!
"Grant cannot speak; he is no orator, as Brutus was; and he has
appointed his relatives to office. I suppose it was necessary for him to
appoint somebody's relatives. I do not care who he makes Collector of
Customs, nor who he appoints assessor; it is somebody's relative; and by
and by, when the history of this great captain comes to be written, let us
think what history will say. I suppose that history will tell us nothing about
how he started from Galena to fight at Fort Donelson, about how he took
these great western armies swinging round from Cairo to the sea: and now
that great, silent soldier saved the nation the priceless treasure of free gov
ernment for all ages to come. Perhaps the historian will say nothing about
that. He will omit Appomattox, he will omit Spottsylvania ; he will omit the
bloody record of the days in the wilderness in what he has to say; but he
will tell you how this man found his old father a postmaster when he was
elected, and kept him there; he will tell he was at Long Branch four weeks;
he will tell you somebody complained that he received a gift. Stop and
think how mean, how trivial how utterly and altogether unworthy in the
record which history shall make up, when the mists of passion and preju
dice shall have cleared away, will all these things seem to be! They are
just as small, and just as trivial, and just as mean, and just as ungrateful,
and just as dirty to-day my fellow citizens, as they will be a hundred years
hence ; but in the light of history, how small, will be more clearly appar
ent, perhaps, than to-day. But when the record of his name comes to be
written, when the great journey of that silent soldier is completed, he will
march down the aisles of time hand in hand with our great martyred
President, Abraham Lincoln; and, standing on the highest summit of earthly
262 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
eminence and heroic achievement, the whole world will hail and salute him."
[Cheers.]
Mr. Greeley's record was reviewed as follows :
•'Opposed to him is Horace Greeley. Now, we all know Horace Greeley.
We all know what he has been in politics, and we all know what he is in
politics to-day. I have no terms of opprobrim to apply to him ; no denun-
ciating ephithets to use against him. I appeal, hurriedly and briefly, to
his record, and let his record speak; and his record is all the more damag
ing, and his unfitness for the great place for which he is nominated all the
more conspicuous, when I concede, as for the purpose of the argument I
will do, that he is honest.
"In 1858, he signalized himself in this State by interfering in our Senatorial
election, and attempting to dictate to the Republicans of the State of Illi
nois that they should throw Abraham Lincoln overboard and return Stephen
A. Douglas to the United States Senate. In 1860, he made his advent in
Chicago as a delegation to the National Convention from the State of
Oregon. He came there, not for the purpose of fulfilling any great mission,
but he came there to gratify a spite which he entertained against William
H. Seward, for whom his whole State was unanimous, and voted 48^
times for Edward Bates as President of the United States. We all know
how, through those days which preceded the war, how vigorously, bravely,
and courageously he talked, how he denounced the accursed slave-power;
how he urged all young men to war to the knife against it if need be ; but
when the final hour of need came, when, having urged it on the stump, in
Congress, and at the polls, then, when the supreme moment of trial came,
and the question was submitted to the last court to which these questions
are ever taken — the arbitrament of war, when our ranks were being filled
up, and we looked around for the great leader whose clarion voice had for
ten years shouted us on, where did we find him? Was Horace Greeley
there? we saw him with tail down and ears pinned back, cutting for the
brush, [laughter] — and the first thing that Horace Greeley recommended
when the hour of trouble finally reached us was that 'our Southern sisters
should be permitted to depart in peace.' I shall not stop here to read
extracts; I shall not stop to discuss whether the advice was wise or unwise;
but suppose that we had taken Horace Greeley's advice. Suppose that in
1860 his advice had been followed and Bates had been nominated for
President instead of Abraham Lincoln; suppose his advice had been taken
at the outbreak of the war when the clouds began for the first time to roll
threatingly up in the sky; if we had taken Horace Greeley's advice at that
moment we would have been to-day a disgraced, broken, shamed and
humilated nation. [Applause.]
"I will follow him a little further. There was different stuff, thank God,
in this people than in Horace Greeley. They resolved that what they had
said on the stump, and what they had declared at the polls, should be car
ried out, and that this nation, which was worth talking for, was worth fight
ing for. They fought for it, and they saved it. Finding that his advice was
THE CAMPAIGN OF 18/2. 263
not taken, you all remember how he wrote his most intemperate 'On to
Richmond' call, and finally, after our arms had been defeated at Bull Run,
he penned at the top of an article, 'Just This Once,' and begged pardon of
the people, whom he was afraid he had betrayed, and promised never to do
so any more. By and by he got courageous again, and before the proper
moment had arrived, he insisted in an impudent letter to Abraham Lincoln
that the slaves must be all at once emancipated. You remember how
Lincoln answered that letter. Down in the mouth again, he insisted that if
Lee watered his horses in the river Delaware, we should cry quits, and give
up the contest; surrender our national integrity, and recognize the indepen
dence of the Southern Confederacy. We didn't do it. Lee did water his
horses in the waters of the Delaware, and the silent soldier who makes no
speeches answered that piece of southern bravado on the 4th of July, 1863,
by sending us the intelligence that he had taken the stronghold of Vicksburg,
captured 30,000 rebel prisoners of war, and opened the Mississippi from St.
Paul to the Gulf. [Cheers.] On that same day, on the blood-stained field
of Gettysburg, Lee who had watered his horses in the river Delaware, was
driven back defeated and discomfited, the back bone of the rebellion was
broken, and a check put upon its career from which it never recovered.
"That is not all. A call was made for troops, and of course Greeley
flunked again. In 1864, he inaugurated peace negotiations with whom?
With Colorado Jewett, probably the champion free-lunch eater of the
American continent; a man known all over the country as a chronic dead-
beat. [Laughter.] He was the negotiator with whom Horace Greeley opened
negotiations for the purpose of securing peace ; and after letters had passed
between him and Jewett, he writes to the President calling his attention to
the fact, and using this expression : — ' Mr. President, I venture to remind
you that our broken, bleeding, dying, and almost bankrupt country cries for
peace.' Lincoln at once upon the reception of that letter, wrote him back
that if there was anybody anxious to treat for peace on the basis of a
restored L^nion and the abandonment of slavery, to send him or bring
him to him, and he was ready to treat upon that basis. You remember the
course which the negotiations took. It turned out that the commissioners
were not authorized. Finally Greeley wrote a letter to the President stating
that these men in Canada were not authorized to treat, but they thought
they might get somebody who would be, and, accordingly, the President
wrote that famous ' To whom it may concern ' paper, stating precisely the
same terms embraced in the first letter he addressed to Greeley. Greeley
withheld from the rebel commissioners that the President had in the first
instance made that the only basis on which negotiations could be conducted ;
and when Clay and Holcombe made a complaint that the President had
seduced them into the belief that the negotiations might be made freely and
without terms, Greeley joined with them and said the negotiations had been
brought to an end because the President had abandoned the basis on which
they had been inaugurated. Now, I do not care so much, that in the course
of these negotiations he recommended that £400,000,000 be paid for the
slaves ; I do not care so much that he blundered in opening them with
264 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
Colorado Jewett ; I do not care so much that he misled the rebel commis
sioners themselves ; but I do care, as it behooves every Illinoisan who holds
the good name and memory of Abraham Lincoln dear in his heart, — I do
care that on that occasion Horace Greeley joined with the rebel commis
sioners and placed Abraham Lincoln in a false position before the country.
Abraham Lincoln had made no change of base ; the first letter he sent
announced the only basis on which these negotiations could be conducted ;
he asked Greeley to show that first letter to the commissioners in order that
there might be no mistake about it, and you remember how we were all
dumbfounded when a portion of that correspondence was published, how we
saw no escape for the President, and how it seemed to us and to the whole
country that Lincoln had been trifling with these commissioners, had aban
doned the position, and had misled and betrayed them ; and when, in order
to set himself right before the world, Abraham Lincoln asked Horace Greeley
for the privilege of publishing the whole correspondence, merely omitting the
phrase, 'our bleeding, bankrupt and dying country/ because he said it
might discourage and dishearten the people at the north, — when he asked
that his good name might be vindicated before thirty-seven millions of people,
Horace Greeley refused. Horace Greeley joined in the cry against him, and
by that refusal placed Lincoln in a false position before this country for two
years ; and not until the danger had passed, not until the storms of war had
rolled away, was the correspondence published, and the name and good
fame of our martyred President vindicated.
"That is not all, my fellow citizens. I do not charge him with complicity
with Tammany, but I do say this, that that State Central Committee in the
City of New York, which Horace Greeley represents, has been a Tammany
committee from the beginning; that the reason why, for years and years, we
could not do anything in the City and State of New York was that Tweed
owned, managed, and ran these committees. Now, what is the cause of
this breaking out between Greeley and the President 1 It is this ; at the last
organization of the Republican State Committee at New York, it was repre
sented to the President by leading men of both parties in the State that
unless this committee was reorganized, it would be utterly impossible to make
any head against Tammany, which had corrupted the whole country,
plundered that great city, and depreciated and almost ruined her credit ; and
hence the weight and moral effect of the administration was given for that
purpose, and the Tammany men on the committee were thrown overboard
— Ben Field and the rest. Greeley denounced the President because
Tammany was overwhelmingly beaten ; it was for that — because this sterling
President, who never made a promise that he did not keep, and never
deserted a friend in the hour of trial and trouble, because \J. S. Grant, the
great captian of our age, and our leader, then stood between this despoiled
and plundered community and their robbers, — that this outcry is raised in
the City of New York, and Greeley is to-day running on what they call
a Liberal Reform ticket. Now, who are his surrounders and friends?
Waldo Hutchins, Hank Smith, Fithian, Ben Field, — men notorious all over
the continent, as the tools, the dupes, and the lick-spittles of Tammany for
THE CAMPAIGN OF 18/2. 265
years past. I need do nothing more than appeal to the Chicago Tribune
on the morning after his nomination. The Tribune substantially said 'he
must rid himself of all the dead-beats and plunderers that surrounded him.'
"They tell us the war is finished; perhaps it is. I ask every sincere
Republican in this house to-night what he believes would be the result,
provided we had at the next assembling of Congress a Democratic majority
in either or both branches of our national Congress. They need not under
take to repeal the fifteenth amendent, or the fourteenth, but you and I
know that there is such a thing as unfriendly legislation. You know as
well as I there is not a man in this house that does not know it — that with
a Democratic majority in either branch of our national Congress, you might
pile up facts mountains high, showing that the new freeman had been
outraged, insulted, and abused, and they would not see the facts. The
time has not come when it is safe to withdraw from the hands of this great
party the power with which, for years, you have entrusted it. It is a ques
tion which we must regulate and decide as we do all other questions ; we
must determine what men will do in the future by what they have done in
the past.
"If there should come to the cashier of the bank in this city two appli
cants for the office of teller, both of them with their platforms precisely alike,
embodying the ten commandments, Christ's sermon on the Mount, and
everything that is good in morals and business, still the cashier, I take it,
would not decide upon these applications merely on the platforms which
these men made ; he would enquire into their history ; and if he found that
one fellow had robbed his employer's till, that his credit was bad and his
morals weak, and the other had never been suspected of any offence, he
would select the man whose record had been good in the past, notwith
standing the old thief might say he had taken a 'new departure,' and
promised never to do so any more. [Laughter and cheers.] ' I am glad to
hear you have taken a new departure ; I hope your platform is all right ; I
think your platform is; but my dear sir, I must let you depart first with
somebody else's money than my own.' [Laughter.] Everybody who asks
us for political position, for power, for trust, can see that reputation is not a
dead issue. The reputation of any party which solicits power is always in
issue, and it always will be in issue. [Cheers.]
'•Now, what issues do they present to us? Simply two. In this liberal
platform which they all seem so anxious to put up, they clamor for the one-
term principle. I am opposed to it, and so are you. One term is too long
for a bad President, and two terms are not more than enough for a good
one. We needed no amendment of the Constitution to get rid of James
Buchanan and to get rid of Andrew Johnson. We did not need any
amendment of the Constitution to shut off Martin Van Buren, James K.
Polk, and the rest of them; and the fact that we elected Abraham Lincoln
because the interests of the nation demanded it is an eternally convincing
proof of the futility of such a plea as that the whole of the people shall be
tied hand and foot by a clause of that kind in our organic law. I believe
thirty-seven millions of people are quite competent to determine whether
266 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
they want a man for President the second time or not. They have always
been able to do it and all the precedents of our history have justified their
conduct whenever they have, as they have done in many instances, quietly
thrown him overboard.
"But they tell us they are also in favor of local self-government. Now,
what does local self-government mean? Governor Palmer has had a break
ing out of local self-government ever since he has been Governor of Illinois.
The local self-government, or state sovereignty, is the queerest disease
that has ever afflicted any man in this world; infinitely worse than inflam
matory rheumatism ; it is absolutely ineradicable ; all the waters of the deep
sea could not wash it out. In his first message, the Governor talks of state
sovereignty; so he went down to Cincinnati, with his little budget of the
military occupation of the city of Chicago. And their platform talks of local
self-government. Why, it is the old exploded theory of state sovereignty, and
nothing else under heaven. Read the Democratic speeches that are made
at their meetings, endorsing Greeley and favoring his nomination by the
convention, and election. It is the same talk we heard exactly, all through
the war, of tyranny and oppression, and the iron heel of the tyrant. My
fellow citizens, go home to-night and ask yourselves, in the presence of
your own conscience, and in the presence of God, whether you feel you
have been tyrannized over. Ask yourselves whether this magnificent specta
cle which is now presented is the result of tyranny — that of a great people,
led as they have been by the steady hand of this great captain, encounter
ing a mighty volume .of debt, and reducing that debt hundreds of millions
of dollars, and at the same time reducing the burden of their taxation in
equal proportions. Think, too, how our greenbacks are appreciating; think
how our bonds are appreciating in the markets of the world ; think how our
credit has advanced ; think how prosperity prevails throughout all our bor
ders; and then, look at the President of the United States, and thank God
that he is no genius, that he is simply a plain, honest, capable, faithful
man, true to the interests of the great people by whom he was placed in
his position.
"He declared to you at the outset. 'I shall have no policy opposed to the
will of the people.' How did he illustrate it? He thought, early in his
administration, that the interests of this country demanded the acquisition
of the Island of San Domingo. I thought it did not ; the most of you
thought it did not; I have seen occasion to change my opinion upon that
subject ; but finding that the will of the people was against it, General
Grant sends his manly and noble message to Congress, and says, 'I
thought that the interests of our trade, our commerce, and our nation
demanded the acquisition of that island ; I thought not only for commercial
purposes, and in view of future complications with foreign powers, we
ought to have it, but in and of itself we ought to have it, I thought so
then, and I think so still. I sent my commissioners, among the best men
in the country there, and they have reported as I thought. You, my fel
low citizens, do not want it ; I only want it for you ; if you do not want it,
do not have it ; I have no policy opposed to the will of the people."
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 8/2. 26/
[Cheers.] I tell you, in the years that are to come, standing up against all
the glittering rhetoric of mere senatorial orators, that simple state paper,
magnificent in its self-denying patriotism, will stand out like a great
gigantic pyramid, challenging the admiration and gratitude of mankind.
" Yet, after having done what he has done, and accomplished what he has
accomplished, it is insisted that he must be thrown overboard, and Horace
Greeley substituted in his place. It is claimed that he has violated his faith
with the people in the injudicious appointments he has made. I am here
making no apologies ; I am not here as a partisan either ; but I believe that
there is, deep down in the popular heart of the people, a sense of fair play
and of common decent treatment, that will vindicate, and protect, and defend
him ; that same great nation that has rallied around our martyred President as
with cords of steel, will rally around their living captain as with flames and
circlets of fire, and protect, and justify, and care for, and defend him.
[Cheers.] I ask you now to remember, whenever there has been, in the
history of the politics of this country, charges so malignant and so base, and
epithets so vituperative as have been employed against Ulysses S. Grant, you
would stop and ask yourselves, 'What has this man done? Has he broken
open a bank ? Has he stricken down his neighbor in the dead hour of the
night? Has he robbed anybody? Of what offense is he guilty? What crime
has he committed?' Run through trie whole catalogue of crimes, and still
the denunciations that have been poured upon him have been all too severe ;
and we answer and say : ' He has done nothing except to save this
nation.' We will save it again, and save it, my fellow citizens, through
him. The contest upon which we are just entering will be one of the most
animated which has ever occurred in the political history of this country ;
the same old party stands up as strong, powerful and bold as it ever did ;
its banner is lifted just as high ; it keeps step to-day, as it always has
kept step to the glorious music of the nation ; it knows no faltering, it
knows no shrinking of the spirit, no trembling of the nerve ; and as we
come into line, now at the opening of this campaign, here together in
this great and magnificent county of La Salle, let the old fires burn, all up
and down the land, and let the word go all up and down the line, let the old
spirit rise up in every heart, and let the old order be given from the begin
ning to the end of the continent, ' Forward ! ' and victory is assuredly ours.
[Loud applause.]"
Mr. Storrs spoke the following week at Freeport, going over
the same ground as at Ottawa, and in pretty much the same
form. He commenced by referring to a Republican meeting he
had addressed there in 1861, and another in 1864, when Abraham
Lincoln was a candidate for a second term. He then gave a
running history of the Republican party, from its organization,
showing that the party had religiously performed every promise
which it had ever made, and kept its faith with the people. He
"went on to say:
268 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
"The platform of the so-called 'Liberals' calls for nothing which the people
demand and which the Republican party is not abundantly able to carry
out. The Liberals demand the payment of the national debt ; but the
Republican party is paying it at the rate of one hundred millions of dollars
per year. They demand the reduction of taxation, but the Republican party
has already reduced taxation over one hundred millions of dollars. They
demand the resumption of specie payments, but the policy of the Republican
party has so far strengthened the national credit, that we are hastening
toward specie resumption as rapidly .as the business interests of the nation
will justify. The Liberals do not care to tell us how they intend to
resume, or when. That is the only point upon which there is any difference
between anybody, and on that point the Liberals are silent and do not
dare to speak. They demand the equality of all our citizens before the
law, but to the Republican party alone is the nation and the world indebted
for the fact that political inequalities have ceased to exist in this country.
They demand a reform of the civil service, but fail to tell us what reform
they wish, or how it shall be effected. Mr. Trumbull proposed that post
masters be elected by the people ; but they have already scouted the
idea as utterly impracticable. The present administration is the first and
only one which has ever undertaken, in good faith, to effect practical
reforms in our civil service. At the outset the Liberals were loud in their
demand for a reform in the revenues ; that they have skulkingly aban
doned, and have surrendered their free trade theories to the most absurd
protectionist on the continent. They demand a restoration of order at the
South ; but the encouragement of the Ku-Klux is a poor way to restore
order. The Republican party has restored order by compelling the Ku-Klux
to behave themselves ; and so long as they can be kept quiet order will
prevail in the South, her industries be developed, and her prosperity be
assured. But the Liberals also demand the one-term principle, and
clamor for the right of what they call 'local self-government.' Do they
establish the one-term principle by electing Greeley, or do they purpose
to remit that to the people of each congressional district? Will they
secure the one-term principle by an amendment to the Constitution, or
by an act of Congress or by Horace Greeley 's promise that he won't
run again? The people are quite competent to determine whether they
want a President for more than four years. When they don't want him
for a second time they have a very plain way of giving him notice of
the fact. We didn't have to amend the Constitution to beat Andrew
Johnson ; nor did we have to amend the Constitution to dispose of James
Buchanan. They wanted Abraham Lincoln a second time. Greeley and
Trumbull and Chase and several other very high-toned gentlemen thought
that one term was enough ; but as is usual in such cases the people
were quite competent to determine that question for themselves, and had
their own way. We propose to let them have their own way about these
matters in the future. We think that one term would be tdb much for
Horace Greeley, and two terms is all we ask for Grant. As to this
point of local self-government, it is a mere sugar-coated method of
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 8/2. 269
administering the old 'State Rights' dose. Great clamor is made over
what is called ' centralization,' and one would think that there was a
great deal in it. The Liberals don't tell us what they mean by it.
We are familiar with the talk, however. We became familiar with it
during the war. That eminent ' Liberal,' Beriah Magoffin, of Kentucky,
denounced the first call for troops as 'centralization.'
Those distinguished 'Liberals/ Fernando Wood and Henry Clay Dean,
denounced the Emancipation Proclamation and the conscription laws as
'centralization.' The fact is centralization was the death of secession.
As between the two, 1 am in favor of enough centralization to crush out
treason at home, to assert our dignity, and to punish our enemies abroad.
The Republican party has, for the first time in the history of the country
made American citizenship a fact. For the first time in the history of this
country, it is possible for a man to start from the Penobscot and read the
Declaration of Independence in every town and county in every State
to the Rio Grande, and none to molest or make him afraid. All this
clamor about ' centralization ' is meaningless, unless it be shown that the
general government has in some way or other transcended its powers and
invaded the reserved rights of the States. Talk is cheap. But until the
Liberals point us to some legislation, or to some act for which the Republican
party is responsible, of the character I have indicated, we need bother
ourselves very little about 'centralization.' The Republican party believes
that this Government is a Union of the People, and not a compact of
States. It believes that these States are not like a lot of marbles in a
bag which touch but do not adhere, but though 'distinct like the bil
lows, are one like the sea.' For half a century or more we argued this
question on the stump, in Congress, and in the courts. We won in all
of those places. Not satisfied with the decision, the same men who now
howl about 'centralization,' submitted the question to that tribunal of last
resort, from which no appeal can be taken, the arbitrament of war.
They were again beaten. It cost us three thousand millions of money,
five hundred thousand lives, and over four years of war to win on that
trial. I am opposed to a re-trial. Enough of money and enough of
lives have already been wasted on 4he settlement of that question; and
no such thin disguise as 'local self-government' will ever seduce us into
the re-opening of that subject.
"A great deal of sentiment is expressed by these 'Liberal' gentlemen over
what they call the distresses of the South, and much noisy vituperation
visited upon the carpet-bagger. If under the new condition of things at the
South bad men are elected to office, it is probably because the voters have
made injudicious selections. The government can't help that, unless it gets
up a new lot of voters, or prevents those from voting who now have that
right. The negro votes because the fifteenth constitutional amendment
tells him that he may ; if he don't vote intelligently, it is because those
' Liberals' who denounce centralization at the South, have kept him for gen
erations in ignorance. Intelligent voting, like intelligent workmanship, comes
by practice, and unless the Liberals favor the repeal of the fifteenth
2/O LIFE OF EMERY A. STORRS.
amendment, they should quietly accept all the consequences that result from
it. We think that the temporary evils of unenlightened voting are much
less serious than the permanent damage which would result in making the
negro a citizen, and then witholding from him the only weapon by which his
rights of citizenship could be protected."
On the 1 8th of July, Mr. Storrs went to Dixon, and there
delivered a stirring address, which was fully reported in the
Chicago papers, one of which said: "Mr. Storrs is a general
favorite in that section of the country, and, though the afternoon
was unusually wet, yet, as the shades of evening came on a very-
large crowd had mustered. As Mr. Storrs entered the court
room he was greeted with a perfect storm of applause. By this
time the room was densely packed. The court-house square held
fully a thousand who could not gain admittance, and quite an
equal number had gone home." He began as follows:
"Speaking in Dixon seems to me almost like speaking in my old home.
Ever since the war began I have known the men and women of this mag
nificent county. I have been witty them when we have taken counsel of
our hopes, but you know that we never took counsels of our fears. I have
been with them in the darkest days of the rebellion. I have been with
them when defeat and disaster spread like a pall over the whole country.
I have been with them in the glorious exultation of victory. I have been
with them when we have settled grave political problems, upon the deter
mination of which the existence of the life of the country depended. I
have been with the old Republican party of Lee county in its days of
strength, and power, and usefulness ; and I have occasion to thank God,
from the bottom of my heart, that the evidences which I see before me
to-night, demonstrate as clearly as any physical evidence can demonstrate,
that that great party is as strong and powerful, and resolute in its pur
pose and will to-day, as during any portion of its glorious career and
existence.
"The mission of the Republican party is not ended! Its days of use
fulness are not past! And when I am required to quit that party, I
desire to have very substantial reasons, from very responsible sources,
to assure me that I shall make something by the exchange, before I
can withdraw my support from it. For nothing more than what this
great party has done in the past, we should love it, stick to it, abide
by it, and live with it forever. It is perhaps the first political organi
zation which this country has ever known, that can look back upon
rts entire history and as it turns over page after page, say, 'Thank
God, there is not a word written in that history that we desire to for
get ; we are not ashamed of the past, and therefore, are not solicitous
that the past shall be forgotten. We are not ashamed of the issues
which we have put through, and therefore, are not solicitous that they
should be called dead issues. This party is ashamed of nothing that it
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 8/2. 27!
has done in the past, and therefore, does not go beseechingly around
the country asking that what it has done shall be buried in oblivion."
He then recalled the history of the Republican party in glow
ing words and repudiated the idea that Charles Sumner or any
other man had called that party into being. Then he compared
the Republican and "Liberal" platforms, contending, as he had here
tofore done, that there was nothing the "Liberals" wanted that the
Republicans were not able to give, and arguing against their
notion of a one-term principle in the same way as he had done
in previous speeches.
"Now, as to self-government, what do they mean by that? They gener
alize by calling it centralization. What do they mean by that? If it is
something very bad, I am opposed to it. If it is something very good, I
am in favor of it. If it is part way between the two, I do not care much
about it. I wish they would tell me, when they use these words of
fearful import and thundering sound — what they mean? If they mean
that they are opposed to the general government transcending its powers
and interfering with the vested rights of the states — so am I — so are all.
But while I am in favor of the rights of the states, I am, at the same
time, in favor of the rights of the nation. We have spent $3,000,000,000
of money, sacrificed hundreds of thousands of lives, and had four years
of war, in order to save this nation from destruction. I am, therefore,
in favor of a centralized government, so strong that there shall be some
meaning in the words, 'American citizen.' I am in favor of its being so
strong that in the remotest corners of the globe, whenever the meanest
American citizens are molested, trampled upon, or oppressed, that this
great government will put out its strong arm to defend the citizen and
punish the oppressor. [Cheers.] And not only that, but that it will do
the same with all its citizens at home. I am in favor of a government
which, when the organic law has declared that negroes shall be voters
— that they shall be clothed with that right — and that Congress shall, by
appropriate legislation, protect and defend them. I am in favor of a
central power strong enough to see to it that the right so conferred
shall be protected, and the negro justified in its exercise ; and whenever
that right is assailed, as it was by the Ku-Klux, I hold that it is the
duty of Congress to see that it is defended. But, they say that we
must have peace, order, good-will, amnesty, and the shaking of hands
across the bloody chasm. I am in favor of quiet. I am in favor of
peace. I desire to see order reign through all the borders of this country,
and over the whole earth ; but if you would restore order, you must
suppress disorder ; if you would have peace, you must punish the men who
are violating the peace.
"Who made the disorder at the South? Did the negro make it? No.
Did the carpet-bagger make it? No. History has written it. Men
masked, with blackened faces, by murder, robbery, pillage and outrage of
2/2 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
every kind, inflicted upon these new-made citizens, made a very bedlam of
that country. Would you restore it by putting the Ku-Klux in power?
No! — put him down and make him behave himself. When that legis
lation was passed, and the government clothed with these powers, order
came. Why? Although their dispositions had not been changed, although
the Ku-Klux were the same in heart as they had been before, yet because
they knew there was a silent soldier in the presidential chair, and that
the time had come when there must be no nonsense, therefore they
behaved themselves. [Cheers.] It is because this administration has done
that, that it is vilified, abused, and traduced in the way it is. I have
desired to see the time come when you and I and all cf us could travel
wherever we pleased, could say what we desired to say, or think what
we desired to think, and that there should be no one to molest us
or make us afraid. That time is coming, but, gentleman, that time will
not come until, in the prosecution of his business, every man can do it
without reference to the place of his nativity."
He reiterated his former argument as to the difference between
platforms and practice, and illustrated the political situation with
an apologue which his audience appreciated and heartily enjoyed :
"This is also well illustrated by the fable of the wolves and the fanner.
A farmer had been for years engaged in the sheep-raising business.
When he started, he bought a magnificent shepherd dog to watch his
flock, and he put it in office. There was a party of wolves in his
immediate neighborhood, and as the time rolled on there never was any
cordiality of feeling between the wolves and that dog. The wolf party
gradually got smaller and smaller, because the dog would make raids on it,
and by and bye they dwindled down to a very small number. There were,
however, a good many curs in the neighborhood, and they determined they
would join this wolf party, and call it A GREAT LIBERAL MOVEMENT. [Laugh
ter.] They held a convention and resolved that peace and amity should be
restored between themselves, and they concluded that there was nothing
whatever in their way but that dog, and if they could get him out of the
way they would shake hands across this bloody chasm. They passed a
series of resolutions in which they declared that these losses that- had been
caused by their former depredations were atrocious, but that they were
dead issues. They said they | had renounced all the habits of their
previous lives, and that they would, for the future, be the safest
defenders of these flocks. The boss wolf went to the farmer, 'Now,'
he says, ' all the trouble is attributable to this dog. To begin w^ith,
he is a dog you don't want around your premises at all. He is
unfit for this purpose. Another thing, he cannot bark ; there is not a
stub-tailed cur in the country but what can 'out-bark him.' [Laughter
and applause.] Another thing he says, 'five of that dog's pups are in
position here — holding office. [Laughter.] He is guilty of nepotism in
its very worst shape.' [Renewed laughter and cheers.] Gentlemen, that
was a pretty rough case on the dog.
THE CAMPAIGN OF 18/2. 273
"The farmer says, 'These things may be so ; I know that dog can
not bark much; but,' says he, 'he bites like the very devil, as you
know. [Cheers.] I did not want him for a house-dog, so that, as to
his merits or demerits on that point I have nothing to say. As to
these pups, the clear truth about that is that they take after their
father, and I have never lost a sheep out of my flocks; my flocks
have prospered. I do not known about your logic, you may confuse
me as to that, but the good straight way for me is to judge the future
by the past, and I do not think that I shall be guilty of the atrocious
nonsense and fearful ingratitude of removing that glorious old shepherd
dog that has grown up with these flocks and with me, and has never
been anything except entirely and forever faithful.' [Loud cheers.]"
Contrasting the records of Grant and Greeley in the days of
the nation's peril, he concluded as follows :
"Let us be generous; let us be just; let us give the credit where
the credit is due. Let it never be said of us, in the years that are to
come, that the great nation that has been saved by the quiet and silent sol
dier, turned their backs upon him because he was slandered by the
very men whom he had defeated in the field of battle.
"I believe that the great people of this country love Grant as much
as they ever did — trust him as implicitly as they ever did. During
the years this faithful man has held the helm of State in his hand,
how magnificently the old ship of state has passed through the storms
we know, because we have been passengers aboard of her. Let us not
leave the ship. Let us not desert Grant — the old captain, one more trip and
the thing will be done ; order will be restored, our finances prosperous,
and we will come up to those grand sunny slopes that spread themselves*
out in the great distance on the other side ; and on this great continent,
if we are true to ourselves, we will erect the most magnificent structure
the world has ever known — sacred to the cause of human liberty — its
dome as broad as the arching skies, its base as extended as the conti
nent on which it is byilt. Here, in its mansions, there will always be
space, for all time, for the true and loyal and good men from all corners
of the earth to meet and celebrate the triumph of free government
among men."
In the meantime, the Democrats had met at Baltimore, and in
the hope of returning to power by the coalition method, had
not only adopted the platform of the Cincinnati Convention, but
had swallowed their candidates as well. The tactics of the Bal
timore Convention were doomed to failure, and the accession of
strength they hoped to gain from the renegade Republicans was
more than offset by the opposition of stiff-necked Democrats who
refused to accept Greeley and Brown as their leaders. The
irreconcilable Bourbons called a convention of their own, which
IS
2/4 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
met at Louisville, Kentucky, in September, and nominated Charles
O'Conor of New York and George W. Julian of Indiana.
Both these gentlemen declined, but their supporters nevertheless
kept on voting for them, and thus nullified the "Liberal" Repub
lican vote. The nominees of the Philadelphia Convention, Grant
and Wilson, were elected.
The action of the Baltimore Convention gave Mr. Storrs a
splendid opportunity for the exercise of his powers of invective
and sarcasm, of which he was prompt to avail himself. His next
campaign speech was delivered at Jacksonville, Illinois, on the
1 2th of August. To a large mass meeting there he delivered a
powerful address, reviewing the political situation. The points to
which he directed attention were always the same, but he had
now a fresh argument to bring to bear in regard to the position
of the Cincinnati party. They were now embraced in the ranks
of those who had fought to destroy the Union; and Mr. Storrs
brought the fact prominently forward, and prefigured the fate of
the renegades when the enemy had no further use for them. He
said :
"The campaign upon which we are just entering is, in many respects,
the most important, and in all respects the most extraordinary, when \\e
consider the manner in which it has thus far been conducted, that the
country has ever seen.
"A great political organization which, in the short period of eighteen
years existence, has accomplished more for the interest of freedom and
good government than any party the world has heretofore known, hav
ing after successive triumphs over its old and persistent enemy so far
demoralized it that it is rendered powerless for mischief in the future, is
now, and for that reason, urged to voluntarily surrender to the enemy
which it has since 1860 never met but to defeat.
"It has finally been demonstrated that our old, long-time adversary
cannot defeat us. It is equally clear that there exists in this country no
power sufficiently strong to overcome the Republican party itself, and we
are now met with the curious proposition that, because the Democratic
party is not able to beat us, we should for the purposes of reconciliation
turn in and defeat ourselves.
"The man who commits suicide for the accommodation of his business
rival possesses a much more conciliatory spirit than the majority of
mankind can truthfully lay claim to.
"Had Grant, after thoroughly penning Lee up at Appomattox, received
an invitation from Lee to surrender, for the purpose of bringing about
an harmonious state of feeling between the two armies, no serious fault
probably would have been found with Grant had he declined the invita-
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 8/2. 275
tion and insisted, as he did insist, that the vanquished army should do
the surrendering, and if harmony was what they were after they must
be content to secure it in that way.
"No man would be more delighted to see the most brotherly and
loving state of feeling established between the Republican and Demo
cratic parties than myself, but they having been thoroughly defeated,
it is, I think, no more than fair for us to insist that, if there is any
surrendering to be done, they should do it. Had they been left to
pursue their own course that is precisely what they would have done ;
but it so happened that just on the eve of stacking their arms and
settling upon the terms of capitulation, a squad of disappointed cap
tains and brigadiers from our own ranks joined them, and thus encour
aged the brigadiers insist that the rank and file whom they have
deserted shall follow them into the camp of the enemy, and trail their
colors before the foe, \vhose surrender they could easily have com
pelled. It is not strange that the enemy thus recruited should immedi
ately resume their arms, tear up their articles of capitulation, and be
loud in their demands for shaking hands across the bloody chasm. The
wonder is not that the army that is whipped should rejoice at the
avenue of escape that is thus opened to them, but that the rank and
file who, after weary marches and bloody battles, stand just upon the
threshold of final and decisive victory, should suddenly lose all spirit
and surrender to an adversary no longer disposed nor able to encounter
them. ...
"There is no distinctive Liberal party. It was swallowed at Baltimore.
Jonah did not swallow the whale, but the whale swallowed Jonah ; and
the whale did not consult Jonah as to the time, or place, or manner
of swallowing him, nor of vomiting him forth. Do you suppose that
this Democratic whale will consult the convenience of John M. Palmer
and Lyman Trumbull as to the proper time of casting them out of its
stomach, where they are now quietly housed?
"When the Democracy think the time has come, out of its stomach
will Palmer and Trumbull be cast, upon the bleak and desolate shores
of political defeat and disappointment."
He showed that when the Republican State Convention of
Illinois met in September 1871, that convention passed resolutions
endorsing "with pride and admiration" the "eminently wise, patri
otic, honest, and economical administration of President Grant,"
and that Lyman Trumbull then made an enthusiastic speech in
favor of the resolutions. " I am told," he said, "that Trumbull
either wrote or inspired these resolutions. What has happened
since ? One of two conclusions is inevitable ; Trumbull and
Palmer were dishonest and undertook to mislead the people then,
or they are dishonest and undertake to mislead and deceive the
people now. " The point, he said, was not material, except as it
affected these leaders of the new party.
2/6 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
"How are we privates, who are compelled to browse around in the val
leys of political thought, to know what to do, when our great instructors
who have been upon the mountain tops and occasionally send a solid
boulder of wisdom crashing and tearing down the mountain sides for us
to hammer away at, cut such extraordinary capers? Hardly knowing what
to do last September, we reverently listened for instructions, and on the
2Oth day thereof, from the loftiest peaks, we heard Trumbull and Palmer
shouting to us — ' We refer with pride and admiration to the wise, patriotic,
honest and economical administration of General Grant, and we confidently
recommend it to the attention of the whole country.' [Cheers.] In our
feeble way we caught up the law as it was thus delivered to us, and
supposed that we were singing the right song, and in the right key as
we responded. 'We refer with pride and admiration to the eminently
wise, patriotic, honest, and economical administration of General Grant.'
Judge of our surprise, when, on the 1st day of May, suddenly from
those lofty summits, and with hardly a word of warning, we heard
Trumbull and Palmer in full chorus shout forth — ' The administration now in
power has rendered itself guilty of wanton disregard of the laws of the land,
and of usurping powers not granted by the Constitution.' We are all
expected to join in the responses. The music is different, the words are
different. They must be sung to a different key. Something is the mat
ter with the leaders of our choir. Our voices are not trained to this
new style of music. It is pitched too low for us. We cannot suddenly
leave the 'Star Spangled Banner' for 'Dixie.' The words don't suit us.
The result is that the congregation feel that this duet won't do for them,
and they sing their good old pieces, in the good old words, to the good,
familiar old music, and in the good old way.
" The result is the congregation is just as large and musical as ever.
But our choir must seek employment from some other denomination."
On the civil service reform question, he said:
"All those Republican orators who call themselves 'Liberal' are most
eloquent in their denunciation of our civil service, and insist that in
order to effect any reforms therein the defeat of our ticket is an imper
ative necessity. Judge Trumbull suggests no remedy, unless indeed it be
that the Executive shall have sole and exclusive control of appointments,
and that neither Senators nor Representatives shall be consulted with
regard to the honesty, capacity or fidelity of the applicant. I doubt
whether a very substantial reform would be worked in this way. It
seems to me that in appointing men to office without consultation with the*
Senators and Representatives from the State or district in which the
appointee lives, the President would be more likely to be deceived as
to the capacity and fitness of the man than he now is. The evils which
Judge Trumbull thus indicated were not discovered by him. Nearly two
years ago they were pointed out much more clearly by President Grant
than the Senator has succeeded in doing, and, to the credit of the pres
ent administration be it said, that so far as Executive action is concerned,
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 8/2.
Grant is the first President who called the attention of Congress to the
subject, pointed out the evils of the system, and asked that they be
remedied. In his annual message, December 5th, 1870, he said:
"Always favoring practical reforms, I respectfully call your attention to
one abuse of long standing, which I would like to see remedied by this
Congress. It is a reform in the civil service of the country. I would
have it go beyond the mere fixing of the tenure of office of clerks and
employes, who do not require 'the advice and consent of the Senate' to
make their appointments complete, I would have it govern, not the tenure
but the manner of making all appointments. There is no duty which so
much embarasses the Executive and heads of departments as that of appoint
ments; nor any such arduous and thankless labor imposed on Senators
and Representatives as that of finding places of constituents. The present
system does not secure the best men — and often not fit men — for public
places. The elevation and purification of the civil service of the Govern
ment will be hailed with approval by the whole people of the United
States."
He reminded his hearers that, following out this policy, Presi
dent Grant had appointed a commission of which Joseph Medill
and George William Curtis were members, and that Congress
had made an appropriation to cover their expenses. That com
mission had adopted rules, which went into effect on the first
day of January, 1872. The Quixotic proposals of the "Liberals"
on the same subject were then contrasted with the practical
measures adopted by President Grant.
' ' The means proposed by the great Liberal reform party are most
extraordinary in their total want of adaptation to the ends sought. They
say 'to this end,' that is, to take the appointments out of the hands of the
Representatives and Senators, to prevent the bestowal of patronage as a
reward for partisan service already rendered, and to enable the President
to determine the honesty, capacity and fidelity of the applicant 'it is
imperatively required that no President shall be a candidate for re
election!'
"Was there ever anything more utterly trivial and absurd. Judge
Trumbull says that one of the prominent evils of the system is that
offices are given as reward for services already rendered.
"How in the name of sense will the one-term principle remedy that?
The mere fact that Greeley is pledged not to run a second time, will
not prevent him from paying off in offices the fellows who were instru
mental in electing him the first time. How, in that way, will appoint
ments be taken from Senators and Representatives? Greeley couldn't
carry through a measure without the aid of these very Senators and
Representatives. If he took it into his head to count them out in the
matter of appointments, he would array them in hostility to him. And
the fact that he had solemnly promised never to run again, would
2/8 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
make no earthly difference, and would rather intensify than cure the
evil.
" But as I have said, one great difficulty is in ascertaining the facts
as to the honesty, capacity and fidelity of the applicant. Among the
thousands and tens of thousands of applicants for office it is impossible
that the President should possess personal knowledge of those facts.
When Mr. Robinson asks to be appointed Postmaster at a Cross Road
in Texas, it is more than probable that the President has not the honor
of a personal acquaintance with Robinson — has never heard of him before
and knows nothing about his capacity or fitness. How is he to find out?
He must not consult with the Congressman. But the way in which he
is to find out whether Robinson is honest, is by not being a candidate
for re-election!
" I suppose that the man who agrees that he will not be a candidate
for re-election is thereby and for that reason gifted with some supernatural
insight into the honesty, capacity and fidelity of men whom he has
never before seen, of whom he has never before heard, of whose exis
tence he had before been profoundly ignorant. Great, indeed, are the
Liberal Reformers, and Greeley is their prophet. Our practical President
who is not a man of genius — and that is most fortunate — but who, when
he opens his mouth never puts his foot in it [laughter] by creating the
Advisory Board, has succeeded in devising a plan by which the inter
ference of Senators and Representatives may be prevented, and by a sys
tem of examination, the honesty, capacity, and fidelity of the applicants,
to a certain extent, at least, ascertained. But even were the sole diffi
culty with our system the distribution of patronage, with a view to a
re-election, are we quite sure that the one-term principle would be an
improvement? A President, desiring re-election would — if he possessed any
sense at all — know that his chances of success depended on his popu
larity with the people. He would know that the popularity of his
administration would, in a great measure depend upon the character and
fitness for their places of those who hold offices by virtue of his
appointment. Regarded from no higher stand-point than the promotion
of his own personal ends, it would be clearly to the interest of the
incumbent to appoint honest and capable men to office. Nothing will
ruin the credit, either of an administration, or a member of Congress,
more effectually than bad appointments, nothing will give them greater
strength than good ones. This inducement the candidate for one term
does not have. He can simply discharge his political obligations without
any reference to his future chances, because he has pledged himself in
advance to surrender and forego them."
He next addressed himself to Greeley's famous plan for the
resumption of specie payments.
"The Liberal Republicans are quite as vague and uncertain with
reference to the resumption of specie payment as they are in regard to
reforming the civil service. They say : ' A speedy return to specie pay-
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 8/2. 279
merit is demanded alike by the highest considerations of commercial
morality and honest government.' Precisely. But what do they mean by
speedy? Do they mean within a month, or within a year, or within
five years?
" Do they mean that we ought to resume specie payments as soon as,
under the natural growth of the country, we can conveniently do so, or
that resumption should be forced by legislation. Are they in favor of the
National Banks, or are they opposed to them ? We are all agreed that
specie payment ought to be resumed, but how is the question. The sage
of Chappaqua, who is never at a loss for a plan, has solved the whole
question and relieved us from all difficulty. With £400,000,000 of green
backs in circulation and less than $100,000,000 of coin in the Treasury,
he says that ' the way to resume is to resume." Certainly nothing is
easier. Resume at once. Commence paying out coin one hundred cents
on the dollar until it is all gone and then — having about $300,000,000
left that we have not coin to meet — we will find that the way to stop
is to stop. But where is the money to come from to resume with?
Judge Trumbull says our reserve is already too large, but it falls very
far short of being large enough to justify us in resuming. How shall
we get the balance? By taxation? There is no other way to get it,
and we think our taxes are already quite large enough.
"We must either have more coin or less currency. Shall we contract?
Let the business interests of the country answer that question. The fact
is we will never resume specie payments through the immediate action of
any legislation whatever. No more serious injury could be inflicted upon
trade and business interests than an attempt to regulate and direct them
by legislation. Experiments of that kind always result disastrously. But
what might we expect should Horace Greeley be elected President?
Filled with the conceit that the way to resume, is to resume he would in
furtherance of his ideas recommend to Congress legislation to hurry and
force resumption. I am assured however, that Congress would pay no
heed to his advice. They probably would not, but the effect of such a
message upon business would be instantaneously felt at home and abroad.
Every National bank would at once contract its loans, and a sudden
contraction of loans means general pecuniary distress, panics and wide
spread disasters. I am asked, do I know that Greeley will do anything
of th« kind? No, I do not I don't know; no one knows what he will
do."
On the amnesty question, he cited the generous and noble
words of the President's last message to Congress, and then
said:
"If the gentlemen who are not embraced within the terms of the
present Amnesty Bill desire pardon, why do they not then ask for it?
It can be had for the asking. I do not think that it would be sub
jecting Jefferson Davis or Raphael Semmes to any very cruel humiliation
to insist that they should show the genuineness of their repentance by
being compelled to ask for pardon. I submit that question to you.
28O LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
."We are entreated to forgive and forget. We are willing to forgive;
but there are many things which we ought never to forget. The father
will never forget the son who died in the great cause. The widow will
never forget the husband who perished that the nation might live. The
orphans will never forget the father who willingly met death that they
might enjoy the priceless treasures of free government. We cannot for
get the heroic dead of this great rebellion, nor can we forget the cause
for which they fought and died. We may forget, but the world will
never forget, those most glorious events in our and the world's history,
when a great nation, through four years of war periled blood and treasure
for a principle — and that idea — the capacity of man for self-government."
In reply to the ''Liberal" argument tl/at the Constitution had
been violated by the Ku-Klux and Enforcement bills, he said:
"Loud demands are made for the restoration of order and for the
return of peace at the South. We are all in favor of that, but we
differ widely from the Liberals as to the manner in which order shall
be restored and peace secured. We would restore order by suppressing
disorder. We would secure peace by punishing those who disturb it.
"When a mob is raging in the streets it is possible that order might
be restored by surrendering to the mob but a better way by far is to
disperse the mob and punish its ring-leaders. For the disorders which
have prevailed at the South the negro is not responsible, nor is the
carpet-bagger. The Ku-Klux alone are guilty of all the disorders which
have occurred there. What shall we do to restore order? Surrender to
the Ku-Klux or force them to behave themselves? The administration
has adopted the latter course. It has interfered, and by legislation pro
vided for the protection of the negro in the enjoyment of his newly
acquired right, provided for the employment of sufficient force to put
down and punish all those who would by force interfere with it, provided
for the trial of those guilty of violating that article in the courts when
a fair trial could be had. And this is the Ku-Klux Bill.
"I am not here defending or excusing it. I insist that had Congress
failed to provide some means by which this constitutional right could
have been protected it would have been false to its duty, false to the
Constitution which imposed that duty upon it. The Ku-Klux investigation
demonstrated that there was in the whole South an organization of at least
Itfive hundred thousand armed men, whose avowed purpose it was to
drive the negro from the polls, and to put down what they called ' Rad
ical misrule.' To accomplish this purpose every conceivable form of
outrage, violence and cruelty was resorted to. Congress was called upon
to act, and it did act. On the 2oth day of April, 1871, the bill passed
the Senate. Not a single Republican in the Senate voted against it.
''Trumbull, Schurz and Sumner did not vote.
"Upon the motion of Mr. Trumbull to strike from the bill the habeas
corpus section, Mr. Sumner voted in the negative.
"Upon the final passage of the force bill in the Senate, Trumbull,
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 8/2. 28 1
Schurz and Sumner did not vote — not a single Republican voted against
it in the Senate, and but two in the House.
"It is idle to deny the existence of the facts upon which this legisla
tion is based. It is idle to deny its necessity or appropriateness.
After the law had gone into operation hundreds of men were arrested
under it. Over 500 were arrested in the State of South Carolina. Many
of them were put upon trial, and Reverdy Johnson and Henry Stanberry
were employed to defend them. So clearly was their guilt established, so
atrocious was the character of their guilt, that their own counsel, Reverdy
Johnson, in addressing the jury, said : ' I have listened with unmixed
horror to some of the testimony which has been brought before you.
The outrages proved are shocking to humanity ; they admit of neither
excuse nor justification : they violate every obligation law and nature
impose upon man ; they show that the parties engaged were brutes,
insensible to the obligations of humanity and religion.' The prisoners who
were tried were convicted. Large numbers of them plead guilty without
trial. Thus admonished the outrages ceased. For the Ku-Klux knew the
President. They knew that he would enforce the laws, and so they
again accepted the situation. Order is restored — not by basely surrender
ing the rights of the freedmen, not by a disgraceful capitulation to an
organized, disguised, oath-bound gang of assassians, robbers and cut
throats, but by putting them down. For this Trumbull is arraigning the
party which he has just deserted, and mournfully urging that, in the
suppression of these shameless violators of every law, human and divine,
the Constitution has been violated. But the gross inconsistencies of this
new movement meet us at every turn.
"Of course we must expect, in the event of Mr. Greeley's election,
that all this legislation will be at once repealed. Where then will the
freedmen be left? Oh! wre are told by the Democracy, we are in favor
of the amendment. But the amendment is self-enforcing. The Constitu
tion provides for a Judical Department, consisting of one Supreme Court
and such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain
and establish. The inferior courts are created by an act of Congress.
Suppose that you repeal the legislation, what becomes of your courts?
"You have not touched the Constitution — you are earnestly in favor of
that, but still opposed to all legislative action which gives it effect. So
with the fifteenth amendment. The right to vote is conferred, and Con
gress is authorized to enforce it by appropriate legislation. The Democ
racy are in favor of the amendment, but opposed to all laws which may
be necessary to make it operative. Repeal this legislation and what
becomes of the negro? He is at once handed over to the tender mercies
of the Ku-Klux, driven from the polls, and no power can be found to
prevent it."
The earnestness and impressiveness of this ' argument were
never surpassed in any subsequent speech made by Mr. Storrs
during this campaign. It duly impressed not only all his hearers
282 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
at Jacksonville, but all who afterwards read the report in the
Chicago papers; and no doubt had a good effect in keeping in
the ranks many waverers. He closed by saying:
" I do not propose, my fellow-citizens, to detain you for the purpose
of refuting the slanders \vhich have been heaped i.: on General Grant.
Senators Trumbull and Schurz will have faded out of human recollections
and traditions ; their slanders all forgotten ; their little griefs no more ; and
yet the fame of our wise, honest, faithful, patriotic and modest President
will be one of the brightest pages in our history.
"Whatever we may do, however ungrateful we may be, rest assured
the world will not forget nor fail to honor U. S. Grant.
"Should we fail to defend him the shame is ours, not his. The base
charges against him will shrivel into insignificance ; the authors live only
to be scorned, but the achievements which our slandered President has
wrought in peace and war will grow brighter as the years roll on.
"The grand old party of the Union will not desert him, nor the cause
which has made it so great. It is rising now like a strong man from
his sleep, strengthened and refreshed. It never met an enemy but to
defeat it. Under its old flag, led by its old chieftain, keeping step to
the same old music, it confronts to-day its old foe; it will scatter it
like chaff before the wind. [Immense applause and loud cheering.]"
At Indianapolis, on the 28th of August, Mr. Storrs delivered
an address which the Journal of that city characterized as "one
of the best efforts of the campaign." The night was stormy,
and the driving rain on the roof of the wigwam created an
uproar that interfered considerably with the pleasure of those
who desire to catch every word, but the opposition of the ele
ments only served to pack the auditors more closely in the
vicinity of the stage.. "The speaker," said the Journal, "is one
of the most gifted orators in the country, and we can only
regret the unfavorable character of the surroundings last night,
and hope that he can be induced to visit us again before the
close of the campaign." The report given by that paper is
inadequate, but it is the best extant. Mr. Storrs began by pay
ing his respects to Mr. Hendricks, as follows :
"The most extraordinary feature of the present campaign is the indus
trious effort made by our adversaries to rule out all history and all past
experience as guides for the future.
"Mr. Hendricks insists that we must keep our eyes fixed steadily on
the future, and that under no circumstances must we seek to gather any
instruction from the past. We must forget all that we ever knew, and
unlearn all that we ever learned. If we were situated precisely as Mr.
Hendricks is, we might think with him. If upon looking back upon the
THE CAMPAIGN OF 18/2. 283
past history of our party we found what he finds when he reviews the
record of the Democracy — a record stained all over with political crimes
and offences of the most serious and damning character, we would
undoubtedly feel as he feels, great anxiety to bury it out of sight and
to detatch himself from it.
"That man never lived who after spending at least half of his life-time
in the violation of law, and in the commission of crime did not, when
he desired the confidence of his fellows, resent with great zeal any allu
sion to his past career, and seek to bury them out of sight as dead
issues. But dead as such issues are it is wonderful how they stick to a
man, and how they will continually rise up in judgment against him.
The course usually pursued by such unfortunates is a new departure in
its largest sense. They cut their hair, change their clothes, leave their
country, adopt another name, and travel under an assortment of aliases.
All these things the Democratic party is now doing. The trouble is that
the disguise which they have assumed is too thin. We all see through
it. We see under this gauzy covering of reform the old State sover
eignty, repudiation, negro-hating Democrat. They claim that they are
really and in fact converted.
"We suspect the genuineness of the conversion. It is too sudden. The
conversion of Saul of Tarsus is hardly in point, for although Saul, like
the modern Democracy, went forth breathing threatenings and slaughter;
on his trip to Damascas he saw a light, I am convinced entirely differ
ent from the one which the Democracy beheld at Baltimore. The light
which Saul saw was from heaven. That which the Democracy beheld
was from Cincinnati. By it they were enabled to see the Treasury
Department and all the other departments of the government, a spectacle
which had not gladdened their eyes for years. Saul didn't ask the dis
ciples to join him, but he joined them. Saul did not propose that the
famous liberal Christian, Judas, should join him and the high priest for a
great reform movement. Saul not only changed his views but he changed
his name, and thenceforth was no longer known as Saul of Tarsus, but
as Paul, the Apostle.
"'Our party has always been a great political missionary organization.
We have to-day within our ranks thousands and hundreds of thousands
of converted Democrats. We expect to have hundreds of thousands more.
With us they feel that glorious freedom, which the truth alone can give,
that 'joy which passeth all understanding.' '
Mr. Storrs was quite in a biblical vein, and his speech
throughout was pointed with scriptural illustrations.
"The overthrow of the rebellion liberated four millions of negroes, but
it liberated even a larger number of Democrats. The colored man had
sense enough to seize his liberty. But many Democrats seem to be afraid
to take out their manumission papers. Don't be alarmed my Democratic
friends. Freedom won't hurt you. Avail yourself of it, and the longer
you enjoy it the better you will like it.
284 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORRS.
"We think it most ungenerous, that after having liberated the Demo
crat from the thralldom which bound him for years, after having saved
for him the country which his party sought to destroy, after having freely
forgiven the manifold sins of omission and commission of which he has
been guilty, he should seek to deprive the negro of even the slightest
benefits of his newly acquired freedom, and should exact from him the
full measure of the little debt he owes even unto the uttermost farthing.
"It is an old story, but in point here, that of the king who took an
account of his servants, one of whom owed him ten thousand talents ;
having nothing with which to discharge this heavy debt the servant
begged for patience and promised to pay all. Moved with compassion
the king pardoned him and forgave .the debt. .
" How much like a modern Democrat that old servant behaved. Going
into the streets rejoicing in his freedom, he meets a fellow servant who
owed him an hundred pence, and he laid hands on him and took him
by the throat saying, ' pay me that tho.u owest.' This fellow -servant
begged for mercy, promised to pay all, but the big debtor cast his
fellow servant into prison until he should pay the debt, and .then we are
told his Lord was wroth, and delivered this unjust servant over to the tor
mentors until he should pay all that was due.
" Let these Democrats take heed from this story. Nothing torments
the average Democrat like an exclusion from office. He must deal fairly
with his fellow servants, or the torments of disappointed hopes which he
has suffered the last twelve years, he will be compelled to endure forever.
"If the Democracy have in fact been converted, we would be glad to
know precisely when the conversion took place. They now claim to
be enthusiastically in favor of the fifteenth constitutional amendment. The
Democrats of this State had not been converted when, in your State
Senate, they withdrew and rescinded all action on the part of this State
purporting to assent to and ratify that amendment, and when they sol
emnly 'protested and declared that the so called fifteenth amendment is
not this day, nor ever has been in law, a part of the Constitution of
the United States.' The Democratic party had not been converted on
the 1 3th day of March, 1871, for on that day, upon a resolution declar
ing the validity of the thirteenth, fourteenth and fifteenth amendments,
seventy-six Democrats voted in the negative, and four only voted in the
affirmative. They were not converted on the 5th day of February, 1872,
for upon that day, upon a resolution declaring that public policy demanded
of all parties and citizens an acquiesence in the validity of thirteenth,
fourteenth and fifteenth amendments, fifty-eight Democrats, including
Mr. Voorhees, voted in the negative, and only eight Democrats voted in
the affirmative.
"I am constrained to believe that the Democratic party is not yet
converted. But if it really is, why should it not be quite willing to
give a proof similar to those furnished by Saul of Tarsus? First, let it
cease breathing threatenings and slaughter against Republicans and the
Republican party, and show that they were in fact good Republicans by
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 8/2. 285
joining our party, preaching our doctrine and voting our ticket. Second,
like Saul of Tarsus, let them mark the period of their conversion by
changing their name. Their willingness to 'shake hands across the bloody
chasm' with some of our Judascs won't answer the purpose. The nearer
they get the further they are from us. Finally — before joining Judas
even they demand pay for their repentance. They show their wisdom by
refusing to give credit. And all this we think shows that Judas will be
fooled. Over such a result, however, we should have no tears to shed.
"There are to-day but two parties in this country. The Liberal reform
party went to pieces at its birth. The only principles which its promoters
claimed gave it a distinctive character were, revenue reform, and civil
service reform. Both these were shamelessly surrendered in their platform.
To secure free trade they nominated the most extreme protectionist in
the country. To reform the civil service they nominated a candidate who
proposes to remove all present incumbents, fill up the offices with .Demo
crats, and to enable them to wield the power thus acquired for their
own purposes, pledges himself in advance that he will not be a candidate
for re-election.
"They ask us, how are you going to get along without Trumbull, Fen-
ten, Palmer and Julian? Did not we get along with them and how
much easier it will be to get along without them. [Great laughter and
cheers.]
"Well, Trumbull is gone, Fenton is gone, and I understand that Julian
is gone. Banks is gone and Palmer is gone, ' Why should we mourn
departed friends?' All I have to say is, good-bye Trumbull, good-bye
Julian, good-bye Fenton, good-bye Schurz, take your baggage with you,
you can put it all up in a red bandana handkerchief with a pin lock to
fasten it ; if there is any difficulty about securing future quarters we can
furnish you a man who can pilot you directly into the ranks of the
enemy where you belong. [Laughter and cheers.]"
He repudiated the idea that the renegades who had gone over
to the Democracy ever were in any sense " leaders" of the Repub
lican party. Then he showed the incongruity of the Democratic
platform and candidates, and contrasted both with the plain, honest,
consistent declarations and performances of the Republican party
and President Grant.
" Horace Greeley is the most intensely high-tariff man in the country,
and always has been. Brown is a free-trader from principle, and never
has been anything else. Greeley is in favor of Ku-Klux legislation. Brown
is thoroughly and bitterly opposed to it. Greeley is a temperance man,
to the extreme of total abstinence; he eschews all meats, and is a
•graham-bread man on principle. Brown is a man who, according to his
own confession, occasionally relapses into total abstinence, who favors
soft-shell crab, and butters his water-melon. [Great laughter.] Now, my
Democratic friend, which of these two worthies are you going for. You
cannot go for them both, for they are as diverse and opposite as the
286 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
poles. Then the candidates do not agree with their platform, either
taken together or separately. They do not agree with the platform any
better than they agree with each other. Sumner says he will go for
Greeley because the Democracy have been converted. Semmes says he
will go for Greeley because Greeley has been converted. Sumner says
he is going for Greeley because Greeley favors the negro race, while
Semmes says he is going for him because he advocates the right of
secession. Trumbull goes for Greeley because Brown is in favor of free
trade, and the protectionist goes for Greeley because Greeley is in favor
of protection. Now this party designs to swindle somebody, and if God
should see fit to visit Horace Greeley upon us, somebody is as certain
to be swindled as that two and two make four. It is either the Repub
lican who votes for Greeley on the strength of his Republicanism, or it
is the Democrat who votes for him on the strength of his Democracy;
whichever way you take it, one way or the other, you must have it,
there can be no middle ground."
He showed that the new doctrine of local self government was
nothing else than the old doctrine of State sovereignty and the
right of secession in disguise.
"We fought through five years of war to put down that accursed
political heresy, and now that we have succeeded we mean that it shall
stay down, and we intend to trample out the last vestige of its existence.
That is Republican doctrine.
"But you tell us we have been cruel in not extending amnesty to
our Southern brethren. Well, they all have the right to vote, and the
disabilities existing against them are simply such as are created by the
fourteenth constitutional amendment. Now, my Liberal Republican friend,
if you are opposed to the existence of those disabilities, you are opposed
to the fourteenth amendment, by which they were created, and it you
are opposed to that amendment let me ask you to stand out like a
man and say so. If you want to reargue that question, if you want to
open up either the fourteenth or fifteenth amendments we are prepared
to reargue both of them. But what is the truth about these disabilities ?
What do they amount to? Just this; about one hundred [and forty
Southern gentlemen are deprived of the glorious privilege of holding
office. Now, there are thousands of Democrats at the North who have
been ever since 1860 laboring under political disabilities of exactly that
character. [Laughter.] Since that time how many a Democrat has been
prevented from holding office ? The disability was created in a different
way to be sure, it was imposed upon them by the voice of the people
in that case, and in this it was imposed by the Constitution.
"But would it not be fair and decent to say the least, that these
Southern gentlemen, Davis and Toombs, and Wigfall and Semmes, should
ask for pardon before they get it? The great God of infinite wisdom,
while his capacity for pardoning is infinite, never pardons the sinner
until he prays for pardon. You know it is said, 'Knock, and it shall
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 8/2. 28/
be opened unto you.' 'Ask, and ye shall receive.' And whenever on
bended knee, with a broken spirit and a contrite heart, with his hand upon
his mouth and his mouth in the dust, the sinner humbly confesses his
sin and begs for pardon, then, and not until then, does he get it. Are
we asking too much when we ask that Davis, and Semmes, and Toombs
shall ask to have these disabilities removed? If you think it is unkind
to make that requirment, take a pardon with you and go down South,
and on bended knee supplicate Jeff. Davis graciously to be pleased to
accept a pardon from your hand. You may do it if you wish — the
Republican party never will. [Applause.] "
He dwelt at length upon the inconsistencies to be found in Mr.
Greely's record, and his bad faith toward Mr. Lincoln, and
showed forcibly the dangerous policy of committing the affairs
of the government into the hands of a man so vacillating and
perfidious as he.
In September Mr. Storrs was stumping the State of Pennsyl
vania, and on the i/th delivered a stirring address at Reading,
in the Library hall. The Reading Times and Dispatch says : —
" The audience was composed of our most intelligent business
men and mechanics who listened to the speaker with close
attention for two hours, frequently interrupting him with loud
demonstrations of applause. The meeting was enthusiastic, and
the address a most able one. At its conclusion the speaker
received many hearty congratulations. During his stay in this
city Mr. Storrs has been called upon by many Republicans. He
leaves to-day for Pittsburg."
At the outset, he urged the Republicans' to do their utmost
to elect the Pennsylvania State ticket. He said:
"The interest felt by Republicans throughout the entire country, in the
result of the October election in this State, arises not so much from any
knowledge of the individual character of the candidates as from the con
trolling effect which this election will or may have upon the general
result throughout the whole country. We feel that the Republicans of
Pennsylvania have no right to defeat the Republican party in the nation,
nor even to imperil its success upon any merely personal considerations.
We do not believe that they will do so. In the times past the Republi
cans of the old Keystone have, with a patriotism and unselfishness which
has secured for them the gratitude of the whole country, cheerfully set
aside all personal considerations, and regarded, not their individual wishes
and feelings merely, but the best interests of the nation. This much —
no more, and no less — will be expected from them in the pending State
election. It is not for me to say what, in this State, would be the effect
upon the Presidential ticket of the defeat of General Hartranft. But
288 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
this I do know, that in every other State in the. Union, such a result
would be most dispiriting and disheartening, it might be disastrous.
Pennsylvania holds the key to the position and the Republican party will
hold you to the strictest accountability. Your State election can in no
proper sense be said to be local. Where the key of the position falls,
the position itself falls with it. A man may have a disease of the heart.
In one sense it would be local. But when the heart stops beating, the
man stops breathing, and the whole man dies. We would hardly think
of attempting to comfort his mourning family by assuring them that the
disease was merely a local one.
" So far as I have had opportunities to observe, the old saying that
'the blood of the Martyrs is the seed of the Church,' holds good here
in Pennsylvania, as elsewhere. The attacks made against the candidates
upon your State ticket, seem to have one effect at least, to create for
them an active, enejgetic enthusiasm which might not have otherwise
been inspired, and to demonstrate the more clearly, the more thorough
has been the discussion, their eminent fitness for the positions for which
they have been respectively nominated.
"To the Republicans of Pennsylvania may the defence of your nomi
nees be safely entrusted. It is quite clear that they are entirely compe
tent to perform that work. I invite your attention therefore to the
broader questions involved in our national politics. The most extraordi
nary feature of the present canvass is the attempt made by our
adversaries to rule out as an element of human calculation for the
future all past history and experience. Men certainly never do that in
their dealings with each other. In judging whether a man's future course
will be straightforward and upright we are apt to give him the benefit
of the fact, if it exists, that his past course has always been such, and
however valiantly a party whose history is a record of crimes might
declaim against any allusion to the fact as a discussion of dead issues,
we would certainly in deciding his future course, be greatly influenced
by those dead issues. Our opponents ask us to believe, and to act
upon that belief, that a political party, whose course has always been
honest, faithful, and patriotic will for the next particular four years
reverse its history, and pursue a dishonest, unfaithful and unpatriotic
policy, and that a party which for the last twenty years has never been
on the right side of any question, will for the next four years be on
the right side of all questions.
" Mr. Storrs then rapidly sketched the history of the Republican partyj
claiming that for what it had actually achieved it was entitled to the gratitude
of good men everywhere ; that if it had done nothing, and omitted to
do nothing, which would justify the people in withdrawing from it their
confidence, and that the mission of such a party would never be ended,
so long as there remained one forward step to be taken in the pathway
of human progress.
"The demise of the Republican party is most loudly insisted on by a
number of recusant Republican brigadiers and captains who call themselves
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 8/2. 289
the Liberal Reform party. The originators of the Liberal movement very
well understood that the success of their enterprise would be seriously
imperiled if the people, for a single moment, thought that the Democracy
were to share in their counsels. Accordingly the Democratic party was
notified to keep its hands off. Spurned and condemned at the outset, no
sooner were the nominations made than these same despised Democrats
were besought to give their support to a ticket in the nomination of
which they were permitted to take no part. The most wonderful feature
of the whole affair is the readiness with which the Democracy licked the
hands which smote them, and took to their embraces their most bitter
and malignant enemy.
'"Was ever woman in such fashion wooed,
Was ever woman in such manner won?'
"The parties to tnis extraordinary coalition, conscious of the fact that
an explanation is required, furnish explanations which are as irreconcilable
as their past history has been.
" Mr. Sumner alleges that the Democratic party has been converted to
Republicanism, and insists, with much rhetorical amplification, that he has
not, and that the Liberals who are now acting with him have not changed
their politics in the slightest. On the other han^ the Democrats engaged
in this movement roundly asserted that they have not been converted,
but that Greeley and Sumner have been, and have come over to them.
"The question is rendered still more embarrassing by Mr. Greeley him
self, who, with his accustomed mal-adroitness, places both parties in
the wrong — unties the Gordian knot by cutting it — asserts that neither party
has been converted, but assures the committee from the Democratic
Convention, that he is just as much a Republican as he ever was, and
they just as much Democrats as they ever were. If that be true, and
who can doubt the honesty or the wisdom of 'honest old Horace ?' two
parties having diametrically opposite views upon every question of public
policy, have united each party to the coalition maintaining its opinions.
If that be true, it is the most shameless and impudent bargain recorded
in political history. If that be true, the motives of the parties to it
must be dishonest and their purposes corrupt, no principle lies at the
bottom of it, for neither party has changed its principles or acknowledged
its errors. The Democratic party has always been the steady and per
sistent enemy of every movement looking to the enfranchisement of the
negro, or his elevation to the rights of citizenship and the enjoyment
of suffrage. This policy has been Democratic; it has been believed in
and pursued by Democrats alone, and Mr. Greeley says that they are
none the less Democrats than they have ever been.
"Should it be perfectly apparent that the negro would in the
absence of any legislation to enforce it, be deprived of all the privileges
secured to him by the fourteenth and fifteenth amendments, Democrats
would deny him such legislation. Such would be the policy of their
19
LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
party. Democrats still, as Mr. Greeley assures them that they are, he
nevertheles's accepts a nomination at their hands and solicits their support.
Consistently with 'their policy the Democratic party would if it possessed
the power at once repeal all the so-called Ku-Klux legislation. If Mr.
Greeley were President it would be his duty to recommend to Congress
such measures as in his judgment the public interests demanded. If in
the absence of any legislation upon the subject, the negro was driven
from the polls and by force deprived of the rights conferred upon him
by the Constitution, it would clearly be Mr. Greeley 's duty as President
— being just as much a Republican as ever— ^to recommend to Congress
such legislation as would enforce the right. He therefore as a Republican
would recommend what Congressmen as Democrats would reject. He
would urge the adoption of Republican measures by a Democratic Con
gress, knowing at the same time, as he tells them, that they are none
the less Democrats than they have ever been. As a Republican, Mr.
Greeley has denounced Democrats as traitors and demagogues, has
declared that their party is made up of the lewd and ruffianly elements
of society, and being just as much a Republican as ever, it is to be
presumed that he entertains the same opinions still. The Democrats as
such have denounced Greeley as a secessionist — as a half crazy and
impracticable theorist and visionary, and being none the less Democrats
than they have ever been, we are bound to presume that they are still
of the same opinion. It is possible that in these particulars Greeley and
the Democracy were both right, and that the harmony which now pre
vails between them, results from the fact that both parties are aware
that each thoroughly understands the other."
He proceeded to review the record of the Democratic party,
its opposition to the constitutional amendments, and its proposal
to repudiate the national debt, and pointed out the inconsisten
cies of the coalition on the questions of revenue reform and civil
service reform. The veto power was vested in the President by
the express letter of the Constitution; yet Horace Greeley had
agreed to abdicate this function in respect to the tariff, at the
bidding of the Cincinnati reformers.
"Thus we are to secure a purer administration and a more faithful
execution of the laws, by a deliberate agreement to neglect the perform
ance of a constitutional duty, by the surrender of a constitutional
right, by basely deserting all convictions of public interests, by a clear
violation of an official oath. A political convention which will be per
mitted to demand of its candidate the surrender of a portion of his
official powers as the price of his nomination and election, may with
equal propriety demand the surrender of them all, and thus practically
abolish the office of President altogether.
"The price which Horace Greeley has agreed to pay for his nomina
tion and election, is one which no Convention at any previous period in
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1872. 29 1
our history has had the impudence to demand from its candidate. The
price which Esau received for his birthright was a liberal one in com
parison, for Esau received his mess of pottage Jacob had to give. To
no such depths has a Presidential candidate ever sunk before, and it is
to be hoped that on this ' bad eminence ' Horace will stand alone — the
solitary instance of a public man bartering the convictions of a life-time,
for the empty honor of a Presidential nomination — selling his birthright, for
the mere promise of a mess of pottage.
"Equally inconsistent is the position of the Liberals as to the reform
of the civil service. In their platform they say that the offices of the
government should cease to be a matter of favoritism and patronage,
but Mr. Greeley agrees to make them purely matters of favoritism and
patronage by appointing only those who favor his election. The platform
also declares that 'honesty, capacity and fidelity constitute the only valid
claims to public employment/ yet Mr. Greeley agrees substantially to
make a clean sweep of all those now in office, irrespective of their
capacity, fidelity or fitness, and on the ground alone that they opposed
his election. The greatest %vil in our present system flows from the
doctrine of rotation in office, but Mr. Greeley proposes to intensify this
evil by rotating all the subordinates, but also agrees to rotate himself
and meekly submits to the demands of the convention placing him in
nomination, that he shall not be a candidate for re-election.
"The Liberals are also eloquent in their demands for reconciliation.
They insist upon a shaking of hands, but the election of Mr. Greeley
will reconcile the rebellious elements of the South only. No thought
seems to be entertained of reconciling the millions of patriotic, loyal
men, North and South. The denunciation of the Ku-Klux bill by a
party which has for its standard bearer the most earnest and zealous
advocate of that measure is in perfect keeping with the entire course of
policy which they have pursued. If the Ku-Klux laws remain upon the
statute book Greeley, as President, would be compelled to execute
them. He could do no less. And any party openly taking a position
of hostility to legislation for the enforcement of the fourteenth and fifteenth
amendments would be at once buried beneath an avalanche of popular indig
nation, for that cause would practically render those amendments nuga
tory.
"Moreover, this new party returns clearly to the old and exploded
heresy of State sovereignty. Its platform declares that 'local self-govern
ment, with impartial sufferage, will guard the rights of all citizens more
securely than any centralized power.' The consequent of the doctrine of
State sovereignty was the right of secession and the denial of any right
of coercion in the federal government. It is clear that if local self-gov
ernment attempts to secede nothing but the 'centralized power' of the
Union can prevent it. But this centralized power is repudiated, and
under any and all circumstances local self-government must have its way.
This is 'reforming' us back to the dismal years immediately preceding
the war. The question which we supposed we had settled at the expense
292 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
of 500,000 lives and 3,000,000,000 of money and four years of war, is
again presented to us. Our views upon it are the same that they have
ever been and we hope by this blow to crush it out forever."
Mr. Storrs then proceeded to the discussion of Mr. Greeley's
record, showing that he was not to-day and had never been on
the great fundamental question in our politics, the right of seces
sion, a Republican, that he denied the right to coerce, that as
Commander-in-Chief, if true to his principles, an attempt to secede
must inevitably succeed, that his course throughout the war was
factional, variable and damaging to the Union cause, and finally
demonstrated that in the Peace Conference at Niagara Falls, he
wilfully and deliberately placed Abraham Lincoln in a false posi
tion before the country, and refused to relieve him from it, thus
placing himself beyond the pale of Republicanism, Republican
sympathy and Republican support.
"The policy of the present Administration as to the resumption of
specie payments was then discussed, and contrasted with the absurd prop
osition of Greeley that the way to resume was to resume. The fact that
since 1868 gold had fallen from an average of 139^ to 114, was cited
as evidence of the wisdom of Republican policy as tested by results,
that policy being to resume as rapidly as the business interests of the
country would permit, through the operation of such natural causes as
the development and growth of the country, the solitary fact that at its
present rate, the immigration to this country from Northern Europe alone
would add to the wealth of the country within ten years four thousand
eight hunded millions of dollars, being cited as evidence of what such
development would accomplish.
CHAPTER XVI.
PROFESSIONAL PROSPERITY.
HIS PROFESSIONAL WORK FROM THE FIRE OF l8;i TO 1875— PROMINENCE
IN GREAT CASES — 'JHELL AS A MILITARY NECESSITY" — THE CONGRESSIONAL
ELECTION OF 1874 — CONSOLIDATION OF THE SUPREME COURT.
T NEVER knew that I was an orthodox Christian before.
I believe now that a literal hell is a military necessity,"
wrote Mr. Storrs to Mr. Samuel W. Allerton, February 13, 18/4,
in a letter commenting upon the result of a trial, brought upon
a lease of certain property known as the East Liberty cattle
yards, at East Liberty, in the State of Pennsylvania. The
suit was one involving several hundred thousand dollars. In
April, 1864, the Pennsylvania Railroad Company, as lessor, exe
cuted a lease which was signed by Joseph R. McPherson and
Samuel W. Allerton as lessees, but which, while so signed, was
done by them as copartners of Archibald M. Allerton and John
B. Sherman. The East Liberty Yards were generally known as
the Pittsburgh stock yards ; they had been built originally by
Joseph McPherson, a Chicago capitalist, but under his manage
ment proved a failure, and had fallen into the hands of the Penn
sylvania Company. In 1864, McPherson solicited Samuel \V.
Allerton and John B. Sherman, of Chicago, and Archibald M.
Allerton, of New York, to re-organize and develop the enter
prise. The Pennsylvania road obliged these lessees, who event
ually entered into a contract, to' covenant that they would individ
ually and collectively, during the life of the lease, do everything
to enlarge its cattle traffic. McPherson and S. W Allerton only
293
294 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
signed the articles of leasing, the other Allerton and Sherman,
though equally interested, not signing from business policy — fear
of being injured in certain railroad interests and^Sherman especially
(who, with Samuel W. Allerton, was just then endeavoring to
start what are now known the world over as the Chicago Union
Stock yards), not desiring to have it appear that his energies
were to be divided. The new co-partnership did not succeed, at
first, much better than that of McPherson had originally ; A. M.
Allerton and Sherman soon bargained to sell their interests to
Samuel W. Allerton, on a basis of profit of $11,000 to the date
of the sale. The Pittsburgh cattle yards, almost immediately upon
the completion of the terms of sale, began to make money rapidly,
and, at the end of three or four years, chagrined and envious
because of the money-gathering character of that which they had
sold out at so low a basis, Archibald M. Allerton and John B.
Sherman began a proceeding in the New York courts against
Samuel W. Allerton and Joseph R. McPherson, demanding an
accounting and setting up fraudulent sale, claiming that at the
time it was represented that the profit from the Pittsburgh yards
amounted to only $11,000, the actual gain had been at least $30,-
ooo, while, as subsequently demonstrated, the yards had an
annual profit quality exceeding $100,000. Although the distin
guished talent of Judge S. W. Fullerton, of New York, was
retained by Mr. Samuel W. Allerton and his associates, the New
York courts had decided adversely to them, and their attorney
counseled a settlement, when Mr. Allerton bethought him that
there was a brilliant-minded young Western lawyer and January
25, 1875, while in Chicago, consulted Mr. Storrs. The result of
that consultation was a wonderful coup d1 ctat. The New York
case, with the aid of a masterly bill of review prepared by Mr.
Storrs — so masterly as to bring out of the lips of Judge Fullerton
the exclamation "that is the argument of a great intellect ! "-—was
dragged along ; and, all at once, the Pennsylvania Railroad Com
pany retained Mr. Storrs in a proceeding instituted in the United
States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois against
John B. Sherman, Archibald *M. Allerton and Samuel W. Aller
ton, demanding half a million dollars as breach of covenant on
the part of these three defendants in not employing all their
efforts, individually and collectively, to enlarge the cattle traffic
PROFESSIONAL PROSPERITY. 2Q5
of the railroad corporation, as had been covenanted in the articles
of leasing April, 1864. The litigation which followed the institu
tion of this proceeding consumed many weeks and months of
time. A plea was filed by the defendants averring that they had
performed in good faith all the covenants and conditions of the
lease on their part to be performed. This plea admitted the exe
cution of the lease and relieved Mr. Storrs' client from the neces
sity of introducing it in evidence. On the part of the plaintiff
alone sixty-seven witnesses were examined. Nearly all the promi
nent cattle-dealers and shippers at New York, Buffalo, Pittsburgh,
Philadelphia, Chicago, and other points were hauled into the con
troversy. It was indisputably shown that Archibald M. Allerton
and John B. Sherman had, almost from the signing of the cove
nant, been constantly directing shipments of cattle by rival lines
contra to the welfare of the Pennsylvania and contra to their
express obligation It was, also, indisputably shown that Samuel
W. Allerton had adhered to his compact. Illustrating the nature
of the evidence and how vast the sum of the damages might
develop into, it was proved, for instance, that Alexander, the then
great cattle king of Illinois, by the personal solicitation of Archi
bald M. Allerton and John B. Sherman had transferred the bulk
of his shipments from the Pennsylvania Railroa'd to the New York
Central and other connections. So irrefutable became the mass
of evidence introduced by the plaintiff that, affrighted by visions
of ruinous damages, Archibald M. Allerton and John B. Sherman
fell into the graves prepared for them. Under the evidence there
was no escape for them. Hundreds and thousands of pages of
testimony, already filed in the court, overwhelmingly demonstrated
that, for a period of at least six years, they had not only failed
to perform the covenant which they had admitted that they had
made, but had violated it grossly and shamelessly. The case was
set for a hearing, counsel for both parties being present at the
time, and the counsel for the defendants agreeing. Suddenly
notice was served upon Mr. Storrs as counsel for the Pennsylva
nia road that the defendants, John B. Sherman and Archibald M.
Allerton had retained new legal aid and that a motion was to be
made to file an additional plea of non cst factuni — namely, that
they had never signed the lease and were not interested parties.
That plea was called up, argued and allowed to stand by Judge
296 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
Blodgett the very day that the case was called for trial and a
jury empannelled. Thus the entire issues in the case were sud
denly re-cast. Thus the necessity of making proof of the fact of
leasing relations — the necessity for which the plantiffs' counsel
had no right to anticipate — was suddenly devolved upon them.
Thus, singularly, after nine months of assiduous labor under a
state of pleading which admitted the execution of the lease did
these two defendants become suddenly aware of the fact that they
had spent months of time and thousands of dollars in money
in endeavoring to demonstrate that they had faithfully per
formed. Mr. Storrs smiled grimly, as he said "An oath in New
York binds in Heaven and in the West. These men, claiming a
partnership, were demanding money through the machinery of the
New York Courts, heaping oath upon oath that they were interested
through these articles of leasing. In this very cause they had, dur
ing weary months, sworn long and loudly that they had lived up
to each covenant. In a flash they turned completely around and
denied everything." The trial proceeded ; it seemed conclusive
against John B. Sherman and Archibald M. Allerton, when to the
consternation of Mr. Storrs, Judge Blodgett, after listening to a
mass of testimony and hearing the most extended and exhaustive
arguments, excluded the lease from the jury and decided, sub
stantially, that in no way was it possible to hold the defendants
John B. Sherman and Archibald M. Allerton, and for the simple
reason that their names did not appear in it as parties to it. For
some reason, Mr. Storrs while confident in the final result of this
great litigation, which was being sustained for a reason known
perhaps only by himself and Mr. Samuel W. Allerton, anticipated
Judge Blodgett's ruling.
'"In my judgment,' he wrpte in February 1874, during the progress
of the hearing, ' every exertion that a lawyer not gifted with supernatural
•powers could make has been made to win my case. There is not a law
yer in this city whose opinion is good for anything who is not in my
favor, and yet you will be astonished to hear that I apprehend defeat.
. . . The case is a genuine one, as you know. Our claim is substan
tial, and the defense is as conspicuously unfair and fraudulent as was
ever witnessed in a court of justice. But since it has been tolerated thus
far, I am apprehensive that, upon grounds which I cannot control, it
will be tolerated through to the end. It is a gratification to me to say
that my clients are satisfied. I can do nothing more and nothing less
than my duty. That discharged, I am satisfied, and the demerit of an
unjust decision must rest upon the Court which makes it.
PROFESSIONAL PROSPERITY. 297
"Possibly I am dyspeptic to-day. No intelligent lawyer capable of
trying a case would have a moment's doubt on a point of this charac
ter; and the question derives its dignity, not from the seriousness of the
question itself, but from the large amount involved, and the manifest dis
position of the Court to assist conspicuous and demonstrated perjurers in
the evasion of a contract as plain as ever was written."
He at once presented to the Hon. Judge Drummond, presiding
judge of the District, an elaborate argument — characterized, like
all his written legal papers, by that clearness of analyzation,
coupled with singular beauty of language, which would render
even dry law palatable to the most ordinary reader — demanding
a new trial. The result he told himself in a letter to a friend,
dated February 13, 1874:
"The Court this morning decided the motion for a new trial in the
famous Pennsylvania railroad case, in my favor. I know it will give you
almost as much pleasure to receive this intelligence as it does me to
communicate it. Blodgett delivered the opinion, but while the hands were
the hands of Esau, the voice was the voice of Jacob. It was Drum-
mond's opinion, and while it was very brief, it was the complete demor
alization of all the absurd quibbles which stood in our way on the
original trial. This places us in shape for a verdict against these
demonstrated perjurers, as near a certainty as anything we reach on
earth.
"They staked everything on the quibble ; the quibble has failed ; and
if the Plutonian regions have any occasion for the services of these
people, they are so completely at liberty that they can engage in the
service."
It was only a short time ^ater that all proceedings both East and
West were satisfied and dismissed from the Courts. The shrewd
and brilliant move of the Western lawyer and capitalist, consti
tuting one of the greatest counter-proceedings known in the
history of jurisprudence, resulted in complete success. Messrs.
Archibald M. Allerton and John B. Sherman \vere content to
leave Mr. Samuel W. Allerton alone with his money-getting
Pittsburgh yards; in what way a settlement was made with the
Pennsylvania road, the late powerful president, now deceased,
alone possessed the right to divulge, and the terms may rest
with him.
" Not only as a stalwart Republican, but as a warm personal
friend of Judge Sidney Smith, the Republican candidate, during
this year of 1874, Mr Storrs took a part, which he very seldom
did in "off years" in the contest for election to Congress for the
LIFE OF EMERY A. STORRS.
First Congressional District of Illinois. Opposed to Judge Smith
was the Hon. B. G. Caulfield, Democrat. In a lengthy address
before a mass meeting, held Saturday evening, October 24th, he
showed that the new Liberals were merely " the Democratic
party in disguise," and he answered some of the arguments of
Mr. Caulfield about the centralization of the government and the
rule of the carpet-baggers, concluding with a powerful review of
the records of the two candidates. As his review on centraliza
tion, and most of the other topics advanced, are substantially
embodied elsewhere they need not be repeated; but his inimit
able disposal of the questions of carpet-baggers, negro suffrage,
the one-term question, and his eloquent allusion to the political
party of his faith, merit quotation, as follows:
" Mr. Caulfield complains also of the general cruelty of the nation. He
complains of the carpet-baggers and the enormous debts inflicted upon
the Southern people and the Southern States. Let us stop and think of
this one moment. In the first place, what are you going to do about
carpet-baggers? What are they? They are your acquaintances and
friends, and mine. I know of no law to prevent a citizen of Illinois
going to the State of Louisiana and taking up his residence there. There
was no law which prevented Mr. Caulfield from coming from Kentucky
and taking up his residence here. With what kind of a countenance
can a resident of Chicago talk about carpet-baggers? I venture to say
there are not ten men in this audience that are not in this sense
carpet-baggers, and a large majority I have no doubt came without their
carpet-bags and purchased them after their arrival. [Laughter.] They
came here with nothing but the lessons of thrift, energy, and strong
purpose that they had learned in their ola homes. They came to these
great plains and prairies which held out their broad and generous arms,
and, thank God, they entwined the new-comers in their embrace ; and
here, in these fields the carpet-bagger has worked out the most colossal
and resplendent result in history. He has built up an empire in a
quarter of a century, the wonder and admiration of the world. He has
built on the shore of this great lake, this wonderful city; and when but
a few years ago the flames swept over it, you could see, even before
the burning embers had died out, the spirit of the carpet-bagger rising
from the ruins unconquered and unconquerable. [Cheers.] These are the
results which the carpet-bagger has produced here. If the tree which the
carpet-bagger has planted produces such good fruit, for God's sake let us
plant it all over the continent. They need it especially in the South. Why
do the negroes vote? Because the constitutional amendment gave them the
right. There are, of course, inevitable evils that flow from ignorant suffrages.
Everybody understood at the outset that this was the question which, as a
patriotic people, we were called upon to encounter and settle. Here are
PROFESSIONAL PROSPERITY. 299
four millions of citizens, just made such. They are ignorant, they are
unlettered; shall they vote or shall they not? On the one hand there beset
us the dangers resulting from ignorant voters, and on the other were the
infinitely greater dangers, infinitely more alarming perils, resulting from
depriving that number of citizens of their right of suffrage. But more than
all this, if an educational test is to be applied let us apply it all round ;
let us make it universal. I can see some reason why the poor black
of the South, held down for generations by the system of slavery to
which he was subjected, should be unable to read or write. If you are
to apply the test make it universal, and I won't stop to estimate how
largely the Democratic vote will be decreased thereby. [Applause.]
"But if you pass this legislation at the South, and if they try to
charge it upon the Republican party, remember, my fellow-citizens, that
this vote came from that amendment to the Constitution. You can't rid
yourselves of it, unless you rid yourselves of that. And this fact has
been proved to a demonstration, that however easily the black man
in the South may be beguiled and deceived on the great political and
financial cjuestions concerned, when the great questions of national inter
est comes up he is true. I would rather have in the perils through
which *-e are compelled to pass, a poor black, ignorant and unlettered
though he be, on questions of political economy, than the most learned
man, even if he could cipher through reams of statistics, and preach
about the splendid doctrine of State sovereignty to justify secession.
"Mr. Caulfield is in favor of a one-term Presidency. That is the
only definite statement of principle he has made. How is it to be secured?
Not by an act of Congress. Will he accomplish it by an amendment
to the Constitution ? The people of this country have reached that con
dition where they may be trusted to determine the question for themselves.
The people have never found serious difficulty in getting rid of a President
they did not like. Take the case of James Buchanan. The people called
upon him, knocked at the door, and demanded he should 'get down and
out,' and he got. [Laughter.] How was it with Andrew Johnson? He
desired a re-election, and those millions of people, quite competent at that
time to regulate their own concerns, marched in a body to the White
House, took him by the ear, and gently led him home to his tailor's
bench in Tennessee. [Laughter.] If the people of this country have
decided to elect a President for the second term, they have never made
a mistake. We elected Washington, Jefferson, Madison, Monroe, Jackson,
and where, in the name of God, would we have been in 1864 if there had
been a constitutional prohibition against the re-election of Abraham Lincoln. '
[Cheers.] The absolute existence of the nation depended upon it. I have a
higher faith, a more thorough belief in the intelligence of this people than
Mr. Caulfield. I would leave the one or two term question to the people.
" I would not fetter them in the slightest degree by a constitutional prohib
ition. I would leave this question of a third term to the people, and I
believe I could safely leave it there ; and by leaving it there we will never
see a president hold the office three terms in succession. [Loud cheers.]
3OO LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
"I have said this election demands no special oratory. It demands
calm thought and reflection and a careful survey of the whole field. I
cannot talk Republicanism on any platform but that I feel the old fires
still burning in my bosom. I remember what a glorious party it has
been, and what a magnificent party it is to-day. It is a splendid party
and will send Sidney Smith to Congress. He will go there carrying its
record, and he is part of it. The Republican party, which was started
in a few resolute hearts, in a quarter of a century has dedicated leagues
of territory to freedom; has elevated and dignified labor all over the
world; has carried through on its broad shoulders the most gigantic war
the world has ever seen— so gigantic that the very globe rocked and
trembled beneath the tread of its armies and bound up 3,000 miles of
seaboard with its blockading fleets. That party carried through the
thunder and storm of battle this great nation, the custodian of the priceless
treasure of freedom among men; that party, after the nation was saved, lifted
from the weight and degradation of slavery 4,000,000 of human beings and
made them citizens. That party performed a greater miracle than the trans
formation of water into wine, for it turned a piece of private property into
a United States Senator. Sidney Smith will be sent to Congress with this
record behind him, to represent this great city, one of the youngeet born
of this great Republic."
A question raised at the time and variously discussed, was
that of a consolidation of the Supreme Court of the State of
Illinois, with a revision of the rules of practice. Scarcely a State
in the Union but has suffered from delays from a Court over
loaded with business so great as to amount to a substantial
denial of justice. At the Spring term (1874) of the Supreme
Court, held at Ottawa, Illinois, for instance, there were over six
hundred cases upon the docket, and at least a third of these
cases ought never to have been taken there, and even for the
cases properly taken up, the records were twice as voluminous
as necessity required. The reports of the decisions were two or
three years behind; the decisions themselves were long deferred
and postponed — so long in some instances that the case itself
was nearly or quite forgotten by court, counsel, and litigants;
the applications for rehearing were multiplying at an alarming
rate, and their consideration involved a large portion of the time
of the court; the tribunal was peripatetic in its character, hold
ing its sessions in three different parts of the State, and the
records being carried about from one city to another, for the
convenience of judges to whom the decisions of particular cases
were assigned ; when cases were orally argued the decision was
so long deferred that the argument faded almost from the recol-
PROFESSIONAL PROSPERITY. 3OI
lection of the court ; a great number of causes were then, as now,
carried to that court for the dishonest purpose of delay merely,
and, as the practice now stands, there is no way of preventing
it. [Both then and now in Illinois, the judgment appealed from
draws six per cent, interest, and an appeal, which postpones the
day of payment from one to two years, is a money making oper
ation, a most efficient method of securing an extension, and is
in the nature of a forced loan at six per cent, interest.] Such were
some of the evils which the bench, the bar, and the public were
compelled to endure, and the question arose, what is the real
source of these troubles; what remedies, if any, can be found?
In an open letter, appearing in December, 1874, Judge W. K.
McAllister attributed very much of the difficulty to the fact that
there were large numbers of men practicing law' "whom the
Almighty never intended for lawyers." As was said at the time,
this allegation was doubtlessly true; but, as was also said at the
time, there is no way of getting rid of those falling within his
description who were already engaged in the practice and no
way of preventing future accessions of such men to the ranks of
the profession, save by a much more rigorous examination of
applicants and a much closer scrutiny of capabilities than' fellow-
beings could exercise, for even incompetent men will somehow
succeed in passing limited examinations, and men quite unfitted
to practice law, or any other profession, continue to be born
despite election laws, the Supreme Court, or the General Assem
bly of any State. Being thus, as often before and since, a grave
public question, Mr. Storrs became actively interested, and, at
the request of the Chicago Tribune, he wrote four editorials, the
gist of the remedy he advocated being that the courts require a
simplified, condensed presentation of records. Friday morning,
December 4, 1874, under the heading of "The Supreme Court,"
he editorially wrote — the question is yet alive — in the Tribune'.
"If there should be anywhere an incredulous legislator who is of opinion
that the Judges of the Supreme Court are overpaid for their services; who
thinks their position, on the whole, is an easy one ; and wonders why they
suffer business to get so far behind, let him visit the office of the Clerk of
that Court at Ottawa during its session, inspect the records which they are
required to examine, note the volumes of printed abstracts which they are
compelled to wade through, to say nothing of the reams of printed and
written briefs and arguments, and we are confident that the aforesaid legis
lator will leave the cramped and inconvenient office of the Clerk of the
3O2 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
Court a wiser, if not a sadder, and probably a madder, man than when he
entered. If he asks the Judges whether it is necessary that those records
should be so immensely voluminous, they will with one accord tell him no.
If he inquires whether the abstracts should be of such infinite length, they
will answer him no. Should he inquire whether it was necessary that they
should diligently read through all this vast amount of matter, they will an
swer yes. They will tell him that it is quite impossible to guess from the
appearance of the outside of the record what it contains, and that they are
frequently compelled to read hundreds of dreary pages to find, at the end,
that there is not a single legal question presented by the record."
After a minute illustration, by reference to cases then pending
in Court of the absurd and wrongful incorporating of an entire
record in a bill of exceptions, he laid down the rule, that:
"The bill of exceptions should in no case present more of the evidence than
is absolutely necessary to render the ruling of the Court to which an exception
is taken intelligible. And the practice of sending up to the Supreme Court
all the evidence, without reference to the fact as to whether any questions
of law are raised upon it or not, is an abuse so serious in its character that
it will swamp the Court if not soon corrected. Where the evidence is con
flicting as to a certain fact, it is quite enough to say, if anything whatever
need be said in the bill of exceptions concerning it, that the plaintiff intro
duced evidence tending to show a certain state of facts, and that the defend
ant introduced evidence tending to' show the opposite state of facts. Where
the evidence in the Court below is conflicting, the Supreme Court will
not attempt to reconcile it, nor will they disturb a judgment where the
evidence in the cause is conflicting. These are questions peculiarly
within the province of the jury, and the purpose of an appeal is not to
transfer the trial of questions of fact from a jury of twelve men, who see
and hear all the witnesses and have every opportunity of determining from
their appearance upon the stand what witnesses are entitled to belief, to a
jury of seven gentlemen who neither see nor hear the witnesses, and have
no means to aid them in determining which tell the truth. The trouble
rests with the practice as to bills of exceptions. The Supreme Court of the
United States will not tolerate nuisances and impositions of this character.
A few years since a case was taken to that Court from this circuit, and the
bill of exceptions had been prepared something after the fashion prevailing
in the Supreme Court of this State. The Judges at Washington denounced
the practice in the most unmistakable terms, and gave very emphatic notice
that thereafter cases brought to that Court with such bills of exceptions
would be dismissed at sight. It is needless to say that the admonition had
the desired effect. It is safe to say that in the great majority of cases bills
of exceptions in cases taken to the Supreme Court of this State are ten
times longer than they need to be. Reduced to their proper proportions,
the perusal of the records by the Court would not consume one-fourth the
time that it now does, and the real points in the case would be much more
clearly apprehended and understood than they now are."
PROFESSIONAL PROSPERITY. 303
Again, on December u, upon this same question in an editor
ial on "Centralizing the Supreme Court," he wrote:
"After all, this is a question in which the general public are more deeply
interested than the lawyers. At the final end, the client has to foot the
bills and bear all the burdens of these frightful delays. The Bar undoubt
edly understand how serious these difficulties are more clearly than the
public generally ; and it is to be said in their favor that the suggestions of
reform which they have from time to time made, have in view the interests
of the litigants rather than their own. There are many minor reforms which
ought to be made, and which the Court itself could bring about by rules.
" Every appellant or plaintiff in error should be required to preface his
points or argument by a brief statement of the facts in the case with refer
ences to the page of the record where the facts would be found. The
length of this statement should be limited. This practice prevails in New
York, and also in the Supreme Court at Washington, and its adoption here
would dispense with that tedious nuisance called an abstract of the record.
" Reduced to its proper proportions, the entire record should be printed,
paged, and foliod, so that each member of the Court would have a copy.
"There is no more favorable time for inaugurating these reforms than the
present. The present Supreme Court of the State is a very able Bench,
and compares with any appellate tribunal in the Union. Our reports are
steadily gaining reputation abroad, and with the changes in the workings
of our judicial system which we have recommended would be made still
more valuable."
These editorials provoked notice, personal and public ; however,
little support was advanced by the general press, and for yet
existing causes the series might well be reproduced in these
later days. As Judge McAllister wrote to Mr. Storrs, Decem
ber 9th, 1874, "the articles in the Tribune are excellent argu
ments in favor of reform. You deserve gratitude for what you
have done and are doing to call public attention to the matter.
. . A public-spirited man will always be appreciated both in and
out of his profession."
CHAPTER XVIL
A DECORATION DAY ADDRESS.
1875.
THE HONORED UNION DEAD— WHAT THEY FOUGHT AND DIED FOR— TRIBUTE
TO CHARLES SUMNER.
DOWN to the close of his life, Mr. Storrs was annually
besieged with invitations from all over the Western States
to deliver Fourth of July and Decoration day orations, to address
Grand Army reunions, temperance societies, and charitable insti
tutions of various kinds, and to lecture to college societies or
deliver the oration of the day at college commencements. For a
long course of years, he was in the habit of accepting one or
other of these invitations for the Fourth. In 1875, he delivered
the address on Decoration day at Norwood Park, in the vicinity
of Chicago. It was just after the death of Charles Sumner; and
as, during the heat of the campaign of 1872 he had said some
things in regard to Mr. Sumner's "leadership" in the Republican
party which might have been misconstrued into a disparagement
of the celebrated abolitionist, he took this occasion to pay a
beautiful tribute to the great man who had passed away. As a
specimen of Mr. Storrs' oratory on patriotic occasions, this
Norwood Park address is one of his finest, and it is therefore
here given in full.
" Upon our hillsides and in our valleys are scattered the graves of more
than two hundred thousand heroes, who bravely fought and nobly died,
that our nation might live. To-day, wherever these graves may be found,
have flowers been scattered upon them. The grass grows green upon them,
the soft breath of the coming summer gently ^breathes its blessings over
304
A DECORATION DAY ADDRESS. 305
them. The clear, blue summer sky hangs tenderly above them, and as
the summer comes to deck these graves with its beauties it meets a
welcome from thousands of hearts, and is aided in its work of beauty by
thousands of hands decorating those graves, which, under the touch of the
advancing season, will ere long gleam with blossoms all their own.
" The beautiful custom which has to-day been observed would lose much
of its significance, and would soon pass away, were it confined merely to
an expression of our personal affection for those whose graves we decorated.
The custom would soon, and ought soon to pass away, were any portion
of its purpose the rekindling of those passions to which the war gave rise,
or to the perpetuation of those hatreds and animosities which it naturally
excited.
" Because we decorate with floral offerings the graves of the Union dead,
we would not desecrate the graves of those who died in the Confederate
cause. Nay, more — our affection for the Union soldier and his memory
cto^s not devolve upon us the necessity of hating the slain Confederate. On
many a battle field they lie side by side, their battles all fought, their
enmities all washed away in their blood. Now that they who fought bravely
against each other are at peace, it is no part of our purpose to renew their
warfare.
" I do not overlook, and would not if I could, the special debt of affection
and gratitude which we owe to those, our fathers, husbands, brothers, and
sons, who fought and died that the Union might be in perfect integrity
preserved ; those who inspired by as high and holy a courage as ever
lifted up the human heart or nerved the human arm to action, willingly
met death for a principle — the right of self-government : but our affection
for them will be all the deeper and purer, unmixed with any feelings of
bitterness or resentment. In the language of our great President, "With
malice toward none, with charity to all," we stood to-day around the
graves of the Union soldiers, and, as typical of our undying love for them
and the purity of that love, robed their graves with the fresh flowers of
the early summer. As the season marches on, day by day developing
some new beauty, the flowers will bloom afresh until their penetrating per
fume shall float all around the globe, and i-ntoxicate every other nation
with the hope of liberty.
" But I have said that our duty remains unperformed, when confined
merely to expressions of personal love and affection, The great cause for
which they died is honored and our fealty to it renewed in every annual
observance of this character. Our demonstrations of affection for the dead
soldier would be but a hollow mockery, an unmeaning observance — nay,
worse than that — a sham, were we to forget the cause in which he per
ished, or barter away the principles for which he died.
" He asserted, and backed his assertion with his life, the indivisibility of
the Union — declared it to be perpetual. He fought not that one State
might triumph over another, nor that many States might triumph over one,
but for a patriotism bounded by no State lines, broad enough to compre-
306 LIFE OF EMERY A' STORKS.
hend and embrace the entire Union. He fought, in short, for a National
existence not for one State, but for the United States of America. The
heresy of so-called "State rights," and by this I mean the pretense that
any one State might, when it saw fit, secede from the Union, and that
there was no rightful power to prevent it, the Confederate soldier asserted
and the Union soldier denied. They fought the question out. In that
cause the Union triumphed ; in its vindication the Union soldier died. We
must ever regard it as settled ; to suffer it to be re-opened would be an
insult to the dead whom we have to-day honored.
" The Union soldier fought for a republican form of government, and that
it should be guaranteed to every State in the Union. Are we quite certain
that, although victorious, the fruits of his victories have been safely gar
nered ? It would be unseemly here to enter upon a discussion of any of
those vexed political questions which agitate and divide the country. But
is it not well for us, our judgments cleared, our hearts purified by the sol
emn ceremonies through which we have to-day passed, to pause, reflect,
not as partisans, but as patriots, whether there are not in the South, nay,
even in the North, States to be found where, so far as the real rights and
interests of the people are concerned, while the form of a republican gov
ernment is preserved, its spirit has been destroyed?
"In the triumph of the Union arms the equality of all men before the law
was maintained. No slave to-day breathes upon the soil of the Republic,
and there would seem to be but little danger, that either in form or sub
stance, could his newly-acquired freedom ever again be jeopardized. But
'eternal vigilance is the price of liberty.' No great blessing was ever
achieved without exertion, No right was ever wrung from the clutch of
power without a struggle fierce and bitter, nor retained without the exercise
of ceaseless, sleepless vigilance. If our gratitude to the soldier of the
Union, and our respect and honor for his memory are to be measured by
what he accomplished, it would be difficult to fix a limit. He preserved our
National Union, and thus saved to the world, in its integrity, our nation, the
only custodian of the priceless treasure of free government among men. He
crushed out the barbarism of slavery and transformed three millions of
human chattels into freemen and citizens. These results, the most colos
sal and resplendent in history, were accomplished within the short period
of four years, and the soldier of the Union thus crowded a thousand years
of history into four short years of time.
" Passing all considerations of affection, springing from ties of kindred, is
it strange that one day in each year has been set apart to enable us to tes
tify our devotion to those who surrendered their lives for results so magnifi
cent? But the heroes who accomplished these stupendous results were not
strangers. They were our fathers, our husbands, brothers, and sons. Thou
sands of them to-day sleep in the grave-yard, at the old home. The same
sky hangs over their graves to-day, into whose blue depths they looked when
they were boys. The same hearts beat in tenderness for them now that
warmed toward them in the old days at home. The widow to-day casts
flowers upon her husband's grave, and he heeds it not. The orphan lays
A DECORATION DAY ADDRESS. 3O/
his floral tribute upon his father's last resting-place— he heeds it not. The
father and the mother- repairing to the old hill-side where their boy is
buried, with bedimmed eyes and sorrowing hearts, robe his last resting-place
with the sweet flowers of summer, but the boy heeds it not. But the wife
and the orphan and the parent all know that the spirits of husband, father
and son are about them. They feel their presence in their hearts. They
know that the gracious offerings which love and affection make, rejoice the
spirits of the departed and ennoble and sanctify the hearts of those who are
left behind.
"When the widow thinks for what her husband died, she treasures it in
her heart as sacredly as his memory. The cause in which his father gave
up his life, stirs the heart of the orphan and calls to him after such a sac
rifice to maintain it. The equality of man is something more than a 'glit
tering generality ' — it is a living principle, as sacred to him as the memory
of the father who died for it, and which, were it endangered, he would
himself freely part with all to defend.
"Thus it is that a deed of patriotic heroism is in its effects eternal. It
possesses an indestructible vitality. The heroic deeds of which blind old
Homer sung, have come down to us across the chasm of thousands of
years, and to-day inspire the farmer boy upon the hill-side and the prairie
with high and noble resolve. Great deeds and great men make great
nations. The Greece of to-day has the same hills and the same valleys
that it had two thousand years ago — the same sky bends over it to-day that
canopied it then ; but Pericles and Phidias, Plato, Demosthenes, and the
great men who made Athens the seat of culture and philosophy, are no
more, and Greece — the Greece — lives no longer. And so our country, young
as it is, is the country which our great and patriotic men have made it.
Into the current of our national history the heroic deeds of the Union sol
dier have passed. Their names 'history will never willingly permit to die.'
"We speak a few weak words; but the great heart's gone to God.
They have fought with their swords, won our battles, red, wet-shod!
While we sat at home new laurels for our land they went to win,
And with smiles Valhalla lightens as our heroes enter in.
They bore our banners fearless to the death as to the fight,
They raised our nation peerless to the old heroic height.
We weep not for the heroes whom we never more shall see,
We weep we were not with them in their ruddy revelry.
" But not alone in the rude shock of battle were the great results to
which I have referred accomplished. The rebellion was a contest between
opposing ideas, and long before they flamed out into war had they been
brooded over by the thinker, urged upon the platform, proclaimed through
the press, declaimed upon the stump, debated in Congress, discussed and
argued in the courts. The great champion of the cause for which the sol
dier died, lived to see its complete triumph — and then he passed away.
"From his boyhood, through obloquy and abuse, Charles Sumner stood
forth the unflinching, unswerving champion of the rights of man. It would
ill become me to attempt to pronounce a eulogy upon Charles Sumner.
-
308 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
That work has been so well, so beautifully, so feelingly and truthfully done
already in every city in the country that it would be an impertinence in
me to undertake the task. But the great leading features of Mr. Sumner's
character, intellectual and moral, were of such transcendent merit, that
surely it will be well if his example is constantly kept before us, and our
public men. A man of the broadest culture, and the largest literary acquire
ments, he never employed them for the promotion of his own personal ends,
nor for any purpose of self-aggrandizement. He never used his vast learn
ing to tickle the ears of the multitude, nor were his literary quotations,
numerous and beautiful as they were, ever employed to gild an unworthy
purpose. His intellectual fiber was of the most perfect rectitude. He could
no more take a position that he did not believe to be right than he could
change his nature. He made up his mind that the institution of slavery
was a blistering shame to our civilization, that it was a relic of barbarism,
and thus, believing, he so declared, when to make the declaration brought
upon him not only frowns from, and alienation of, old friends, but personal
violence, from the effects of which he never recovered. In the midst of the
tempest which surrounded him, he stood unmoved and immovable.
"Those perilous times came when, cringing beneath the threats of the slave
power, bent on destroying the Union, the cry of compromise filled the air,
and frightened politicians hastened to abandon the professions of a life-time;
hastened to give back to the slave power all that years of manly 'struggle
had wrested from it ; hastened to renounce every principle secured by the
election of Abraham Lincoln, in order — vain hope — to appease their Southern
brethren, and to persuade them not to leave us. Not so Charles Sumner.
Upon the eternal rocks had he planted his feet, and there was he determined
they should remain, and they did remain. How splendidly he stands out
to-day as he then stood, now that the mists of passion and prejudice have
cleared away and revealed his true position to us.
" The war came : it was inevitable. We all remember how reluctantly we
accepted the conclusion ; how for weeks and dreary months we dallied and
toyed with the slave, fearing to touch the question, and even returning the
slave to his rebel master, hoping still to appease him and persuade him back.
But Charles Sumner knew that there could be no reconciliation until one or
the other of the opposing ideas, freedom or slavery, perished. Years before
in his college halls, he had chosen under which banner he would be found.
His splendid rhetoric, now persuading and now denouncing ; his powerful
logic was day and night, in season and out of season, employed to press
upon the government the necessity of making the issue direct, offering the
slave his freedom, and using his services as a Union soldier. The procla
mation of Emancipation came. I do not attribute this result solely to Mr.
Sumner, nor do I say that Mr. Lincoln did not see its necessity quite as
clearly as did Mr. Sumner. Their positions were entirely different. Their
responsibilities were different. The merit of this great measure can be attri
buted to no one man.
"But as the war progressed — defeat following defeat in swift and sicken
ing succession — Charles Sumner was found the earnest advocate of every
A DECORATION DAY ADDRESS. 3CX)
measure by which our soldiers could be sustained in the field and the
great contest finally pushed through to success. During all these years
Charles Sumner never for one moment lost sight of that down-trodden race
in whose cause he had, when a boy, enlisted. When the war closed the
question faced the country and could not be avoided, ' What shall be
done with the negro?' The slave-holder thought in the pacificating policy
pursued by Andrew Johnson, that he saw an opportunity to still retain the
old power over the slave ; penal codes were adopted by the seceding
States, the effect of which would have been to reduce the negro to sub
stantially his old condition. The people were wearied with the slave
question, wearied of the war, anxious at once to heal the breaches which
it had made, and disposed to be careless as to the means. The danger
was imminent. Faithful through the years which have since passed,
Charles Sumner stood sentinel, and never rested his labors until the negro
was not only a freeman but a citizen.
"The last crowning glory of his life, his 'Civil Rights' bill, has just
ripened into law, and by it every vestige of the old slave system is wiped
away. His 'works did follow him,' and almost his last words were 'take
care of my Civil Rights bill.'
"And thus his career ended. Where shall we find a nobler, a more
patriotic, a more lofty one? But one great feature which distinguishes his
career I have not yet noted. The negro having secured the privileges of citi
zenship, Charles Sumner showed to the world that the warfare which he
had waged in his behalf was based upon no mean considerations of per
sonal hatred toward the master. Accordingly the great heart that bled for
the slave, when he was in the agony of his bondage, after his release, sor
rowed for the master in the trouble which environed him. The great pur
pose of his life had been accomplished, and he turned his mind to reliev
ing the oppressed whites of the South. His idea of human rights knew
no distinction of color or of creed ; and Charles Sumner, he who but ten
short years ago, had he then died, would have been execrated by the
entire South, to-day finds the old slave-holder and the old slave alike sin
cere mourners at his grave, both feeling that they have lost a friend whom
money could not buy, whom power and threats could not coerce. Over
the grave of this great moral and intellectual hero we drop the tear of
affection and reverence. It too shall we clothe with flowers, for in that
grave rests all that is mortal of a statesman as pure in heart, and lofty and
patriotic in purpose, as ever brightened the pages of history.
"His spirit stands to-day face to face with the soldier of the Union whose
cause he so valiantly maintained. The Confederate who once deemed him
his bitterest enemy, now knows that he was his friend. Around the grave
of such a man, all citizens of a restored Union can meet. In that solemn
presence all bitterness is vanished. Adapting to my purpose the langu
age of a great master of English literature, I would say to North and
South, black and white alike: 'Oh, brothers, enemies no more, let us take
a mournful hand together, as we stand over his grave, and call a truce to
battle. Hush, strife and quarrel, over the solemn grave. Sound, trumpets,
a mournful march. Fall, dark curtain,' upon a life thus gloriously closed.
CHAPTER XVIII.
LECTURES ON THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION.
TWO LECTURES TO THE STUDENTS OF THE CHICAGO LAW COLLEGE — THE FOUR
GREAT DOCUMENTS WHICH FORM THE BASIS OF THE MODERN ENGLISH
CONSTITUTION — " BAILIFFS AND CONSTABLES THAT KNOW THE LAW AND
MEAN TO OBSERVE IT" — HOW MAGNA CHARTA WOULD WORK IN CHICAGO —
HISTORY OF CROWN AND PARLIAMENT.
HARDLY a year passed during the last decade of Mr.
Storrs' life in which he was not asked by some seminary
of learning to address its students, either by way of an address
at what is called the "commencement," to the graduating class, or
a lecture on some literary or philosophical subject to a students'
club. The law students of the University of Michigan, at Ann
Arbor, and those of the University of Wisconsin, at Madison, in
particular, addressed to him pressing invitations for this purpose;
and similar invitations came from colleges in Indiana, Iowa, and
even as far west as Nebraska. It is a high mark of the respect
in which he was held in his own adopted city as the brightest
ornament of its bar, that in the fall of 1874 he was invited by
the students of the Chicago Law College to deliver a series of
lectures for their benefit. Mr. Storrs was at all times ready to
extend a helping hand to young men toiling up the steep and
rugged pathway of professional success; his manner towards such,
when they were on the other side of a case in court, was invar
iably courteous and forbearing; and among no class of his fellow-
citizens is his memory more prized and honored now than among
the younger members of the bar. An invitation of this kind
always gratified him, and the performance of the task involved
in his acceptance of it was sure to exhibit him in the fullest
exercise of his highest powers. The students of the Chicago
310
LECTURES ON THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION. 311
Law College of that year will long remember with pride and
delight the prompt compliance of Mr. Storrs with their request,
and still more the wonderfully luminous way in which he unfolded to
them a chapter of constitutional history which all American citizens
should learn, for it lies at 'the foundation of our own constitu
tional history. The struggles of those pioneers in the cause of
popular freedom who extorted the Great Charter from King John,
who procured its confirmation by Edward I., who compelled the
a*ssent of Charles I. to the Petition of Right, and secured the
enactment of the Bill of Rights on the accession of William III.,
as the groundwork of the present English constitutional system/
must always be interesting to the youth of a nation whose fore
fathers were descended from these men, and brought hither with
them those imperishable charters of constitutional freedom. To
'our kin beyond the sea' — returning the kindly phrase used by
Mr. Gladstone in writing not long ago of the American people —
these lectures must be interesting, first as the work of an emi
nent American lawyer, and next as one of the clearest and most
compendious narratives of the circumstances out of which the
existing English constitution grew that has ever yet been pub
lished. No English jurist could have done the work better
within the limits of two short lectures. Many American lectur
ers, attempting the same feat, would have failed to grasp the
salient features of the story, and might have fallen into inaccur
acies of statement from which Mr. Storrs' wide reading of English
books and thorough knowledge of the subject preserved him.
No extant production of Mr. Storrs' pen affords such abund
ant proof of his vast reading of a class of books not generally
included in the average lawyer's library. He was thoroughly
conversant with the general literature of England and America;
the poets, historians, essayists, and political writers of both coun
tries were familiar society to him; and down to the last, he kept
himself informed of all that was passing in the literary world of
both hemispheres. The best new books and magazines were
invariably to be found on his table. His intimate friends knew
very well to what the literary excellence of all his arguments
and speeches was owing; the elegant diction, the clear-cut, pol
ished sentences, that seemed to flow from his lips without effort,
— the eloquence which many attributed to the inspiration of
312 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORRS.
genius or the felicitous suggestion of the moment, — they well
knew that the source from which this splendid result was derived
was the habitual study, in quiet domestic hours, of the grand
masterpieces of English literature. A lawyer discussing a chapter
of constitutional history with the students of a law school might
naturally be presumed to cite largely from treatises written by
the recognised authorities on the subject. The lectures on the
English constitution might, in the hands of another man, have
overflowed with erudition and ponderous quotation from the old
text writers. Mr. Storrs kept in view the intellectual needs of
his youthful audience, and rendered them a far more valuable
service than they were then capable of appreciating by referring
them to the best historical authorities, — to Freeman, Thierry, Sir
Edward Creasy, Mr. Walter Bagehot, and Guizot. The arrange
ment of his matter was at the same time admirable for its per
spicuity. In terse, vigorous, crisp sentences, he laid before the
young men a complete outline of the history of the English con
stitution, so clear and full and accurate that it well deserves to
be adopted as a text book in American law schools, and is for
the purposes of the American student vastly better than the
chapters of Blackstone on the same subject.
The lectures were two in number, the first being delivered on
the 1 2th of December, 1874, and the second on the iQth of the
same month. The first was devoted to an account of the four
great documents which form the basis of the modern English
constitution, — the Great Charter, secured by the Barons from
King John at Runnymede in 1215; the Confirmatio Cartarum,
or confirmation of the Great Charter by Edward I. in Parliament
in 1300; the Petition of Right, exhibited and addressed to
Charles I. which received his assent in 1628; and the Bill of
Rights, enacted by Parliament upon the accession of William III.
in 1689. He gives a very full summary of the contents of each
of these documents, quoting in full the principal clauses.
He had a remarkably happy way of making a modern appli
cation of a mouldy old doctrine, showing its eternal veracity and
therefore durability. The class at the Chicago college were
amused as well as edified when, after quoting the stipulation of
Magna Charta, "Neither we nor our bailiffs shall seize any land
or rent for any debt, so long as the chattels of the debtors are
LECTURES ON THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION. 313
sufficient to pay the debt," Mr. Storrs paused to observe — "In
this particular, at least, the statutes of the State of Illinois have
reversed Magna Charta." And again, after reading the provision,
"We will not make any justices, sheriffs, constables, or bailiffs,
but such as know the law of the realm, and mean duly to
observe it," with indescribable drollery, and at the same time
with singular aptitude, he contrasted that provision with the state
of things in Chicago to day:
"Would to God that in this State, and in this city, the forty-fifth section
of Magna Charta, which is more than six hundred and fifty years of age,
was in force ! As my topic may be considered somewhat dry and uninter
esting, may I be excused for pausing one moment here, and considering
what would become of multitudes of our justices, constables, sheriffs, or
bailiffs, were the forty-fifth section of Magna Charta suddenly put in force in
our midst? How many judicial mantles would fall, how many of our con
stables and bailiffs would be compelled to seek the retirement of a strictly
private life ! This single provision illustrates a most important fact, — namely,
that many of the most important reforms which we call modern are simply
the repeal of comparatively modern statutes, and a return to the old order
of things."
In the second lecture, Mr. Storrs traced the origin and history
of the three states of the realm, the Sovereign, the Lords, and
the Commons, showing that the Kings of England did not reign
by hereditary right, but that the monarchy was at first elective,
and that at all times their power was subject to constitutional
limitations, long anterior to the assertion of those limitations in
Magna Charta. He quoted Freeman to the effect that Blackstone's
theory of hereditary monarchy in England is a mere " lawyer's
figment." Hereditary succession did not, in fact, become the
practice until after the accession of Edward I.; and even after
that, the right of parliament to settle the succession was repeatedly
exercised. Mr. Storrs shows, in a few incisive paragraphs, how
the prerogatives of the Crown, which had gradually been extended
beyond their original constitutional limits, were pared down again
by successive enactments until nothing now remains of them,
the powers once exclusively wielded by the monarch being now
exercised by Parliament. Mr. Storrs gives excellent reasons why
this country could never have become monarchical, and concludes
an admirable summary of the history of the English Parliament
with the following words:
"The growth of the House of Commons has been the progress of the
3 14 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
English people, and every step forward which it has taken has been a step
gained in the great cause of human freedom. We have seen how slowly,
how painfully, have these advances been made. For seven hundred years
have the English people been engaged in securing their rights, one by one.
After long and wearisome delays, through bloody wars, at the cost of revo
lutions, have they finally achieved them to the extent which they now hold
them. Their advocates and champions have perished on the field, in the
dungeon, on the scaffold, and at the stake. But they have never wearied.
As one champion has fallen, another has taken his place ; for the desire for
freedom is deathless and imperishable. By thousands have men willingly
died that freedom might live, while but few will meet death for corner lots
or bank accounts. These great principles of free government our fathers
brought with them to this country, more than two hundred and fifty years
ago."
These two lectures are so interesting to the historical student, so
invaluable to the student of law, that they ought sometime be
published in their entirety. They are of such high merit that no
abridgment, nor any mere extracts, would do them justice, and
to insert them in their proper order here would interrupt unduly
the narrative of Mr. Storrs' career.
CHAPTER XIX.
MUNICIPAL REFORM.
ORGANIZATION OF THE "CITIZENS* ASSOCIATION OF CHICAGO " — MR. STORRS
DRAFTS ITS CONSTITUTION — ITS OBJECTS — SUGGESTION OF SUBJECTS FOR
LEGISLATION — ADVOCATES REORGANIZATION OF THE CITY GOVERNMENT
UNDER THE GENERAL LAW— CHANGING VOTING PLACES FROM SALOONS TO
OTHER QUARTERS — THE PROPOSITION TO DIVIDE THE COMMON COUNCIL IN
TO TWO HOUSES — CITY ELECTION ON THE CHARTER QUESTION — THE CITI
ZENS* ASSOCIATION AND MR. STORRS PART COMPANY — MR. STORRS IN CON
TEMPT OF COURT FOR A LEGAL OPINION— HIS ARGUMENT IN DEFENCE OF
HIMSELF AND HIS ASSOCIATES — THE "FANNING MILL" ORATOR.
AFTER the second great Chicago fire, in July 1874, a num
ber of the leading business men of the city met together
to consult as to the necessary municipal legislation for the pre
vention of such conflagrations in future, and the measures to be
taken in aid of the ordinances to put the fire department and
water supply of the city on an efficient footing. With this pri
mary end in view, the "Citizens' Association of Chicago" was
organized; but among those who saw a far wider field of useful
operations before it was Mr. Storrs, who drew up a constitution
for the new association embracing in its aims the whole question
of city government. This was submitted to a meeting of citizens
and by them adopted, and in a short time was signed by several
hundred citizens of Chicago. A committee was appointed, con
sisting of Messrs L. B. Boomer, Emery A. Storrs, Thomas
Hoyne, A. L. Chetlain, and John C. Dore, to set forth more in
detail, for the information of the public, the purposes of the
association; and their report was published on the 3Oth of July
in the form of an address to the citizens of Chicago, written by
Mr. Storrs.
315
3l6 LIFE OF EMERY A STORKS.
"The machinery of our city government," it said, "is unnecessarily cum
bersome and expensive. City legislation is crude, hasty, and consequently
in many instances injudicious. Our fire department is imperfectly organized,
inadequately supplied with water, lacks other facilities necessary for the
extinguishment of fires, is defectively disciplined, and though composed of
good material, is necessarily inefficient. The police department is composed
of discordant elements, injuriously affecting the police force, and impairing
its efficiency. Taxation is burdensome and oppressive; and, unless some
means are speedily found to correct these and other evils, which certainly
will not correct themselves, the credit and prosperity of the city must and
will be seriously injured.
"The power to correct these evils rests with the citizens of Chicago.
United action upon their part is all that is required to insure a wise and
faithful administration of their public affairs. Believing that the public senti
ment of our citizens is sound and healthy, and that, when properly organized
and clearly expressed, it is controlling, it has been ' deemed advisable to
adopt some means by which the Citizens of Chicago may meet together for
the discussion of such questions of public interest as may from time to time
arise, and devise and mature such measures as may be deemed necessary
to promote the growth and welfare of the city, and to strengthen, develop,
and protect the industrial, business, and property interests of its citizens."
The address then stated that the association was to be perma
nent in its character, have rooms furnished for its use, and hold
regular meetings for discussion and action upon public questions.
"The best method of reorganising the fire department; the best
method of reforming and correcting any abuses which may exist in the
police department, or in any other department of the city government; the
propriety of reorganising and reconstructing the entire framework of the
city government, — these, and many other subjects, might be named as
among those which will probably be brought at once before the associa
tion."
The association was to ignore partisan politics, and aim to
excite such an interest in the good government of the city and
to create such a public opinion as would secure the nomination
and election of fit and proper men to the city offices, regardless
of the political party to which they might belong.
"In consequence of the disinclination of business men to attend primary
meetings, nominating conventions, and the polls, many of our city offices
have been- filled by unfit and improper men. It is hoped that through this
association a more decided interest in these questions may be aroused ; that
good citizens of all parties may be led to see that, to secure good govern
ment, good men must be elected to office; and to accomplish this, attend
ance at primaries, at nominating conventions, and at the polls, is an indis-
pensible duty, the performance of which no good citizen should avoid.
"Close and continued scrutiny of the official conduct of all persons con-
MUNICIPAL REFORM.
netted with the city government, and of all measures of an official char
acter, affecting the interests of our citizens, is one of the prominent pur
poses of the association."
The address closed with an appeal to all good citizens to give
the association their active co-operation. The association was
organized with Mr. Franklin MacVeagh as its first president, and
Mr. Storrs as its first secretary. Among other objects set forth
in its constitution, a paragraph in the preamble stated that it
would aim to " secure such legislation, both State and National,
as the interests of the city may from time to time require."
This was criticised by the Chicago Times, which contended that
the general government could not legislate as to city affairs. But
Mr. Storrs had much broader purposes in view for the new asso
ciation than the majority of its members, or even the press
contemplated as within its scope. That he had inserted this
paragraph in its constitution for no visionary purpose, but that
it was both practical in its aim and properly within the scope of
such an association, he demonstrated in answer to the criticism
of the Times. In a letter to Hon. Thomas Hoyne, July 27, 1874,
enclosing printed copies of the constitution, he says:
" Suppose we desire to have other government buildings erected here.
Suppose we desire larger appropriations for the completion of 'those already
in progress ; a petition to that effect was circulated this Spring. Suppose
we desire to improve our river and harbor. Suppose that a reciprocity
treaty with Canada would largely advance the interests of the city. Where,
for all these purposes, would we go but to Congress, and what purposes
would more legitimately fall within the range of such an association than
these ?
" Fair criticism is healthy. For one, I am glad to see it, for it will only
develop how much of good such an association can, if it honestly makes
the effort, accomplish."
The Executive Committee of the association appointed stand
ing committees on fire affairs and finance. In notifying the
former of their appointment, Mr. Storrs, as secretary, stated their
duties to be to report in writing concerning a fire ordinance sub
mitted to the Common Council regulating the erection and occu
pation of buildings, as to the sufficiency of the water supply, and
as to the fire department and its apparatus. The association was
now fully organized; and Mr. Storrs' professional business requir
ing all his attention, he resigned, and a salaried secretary was
appointed.
3l8 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
He still continued, however, to give the association the benefit
of his counsel and assistance. He put the report of the fire
committee in shape, received donations of books, pamphlets, and
maps for the use of the association, and from time to time
addressed letters to its president and other members, full of
valuable suggestion. One of the earliest of these was that the
constitution of the association should be enlarged so as to extend
the qualification for membership to residents, taxpayers, and
voters in the whole county, instead of limiting it to the city.
"Some of our very best business men," he said, "are not resi
dents of the city; and, as we take cognizance of county as well
as city affairs, it seems proper that our membership should be
extended." This broad and liberal suggestion was not .acted
upon, but on the contrary, after Mr. Storrs and the association
parted company, its membership took the form of a property
owners' club, with an admission fee of ten dollars a year.
Three other letters, here given, will show how thoughtfully
Mr. Storrs had considered the uses which such an association
might serve for the good of' the entire community :
" September 7, 1874.
"FRANKLIN MAC VEAGH, ESQ.
" DEAR SIR : — In the State of New York there is a statute authorizing
any citizen, upon petition to the Judge of any court of record embrac
ing charges of official misconduct against a person in office, to demand an
investigation. The petitioner is required to give bonds to pay all costs and
charges atttending the examination and investigation, should there be a failure
to sustain the charges. The party charged is subject to removal from office
in the event the petition is sustained. It is believed that such a statute
would be of great service in this State. I would also suggest that the limi
tation for prosecution of cases of bribery, etc., is too short; that it should
be made three years. Would it not be well to refer both these topics to
the committee on State legislation for examination ? They would have ample
time to hunt up all the legislation in other States on the first point, particu
larly, and gather such information as to the practical working of the law as
might be desirable. That committee could then frame their bill, and be
ready to present a full report at the opening of the next session.
"Yours, £c.,
" EMERY A. STORRS."
"December 4, 1874.
" FRANKLIN MACVEAGH, ESQ.
. . . "Now for one more suggestion. As the law now stands, when
ever a bill in chancery is filed to reach real estate in the hands of an
MUNICIPAL REFORM. 319
alleged fraudulent vendee or purchaser, such bill is a lien upon the prop
erty immediately upon service of process. Although the records might
show a complete and perfect title in such vendee, a purchaser from him
subsequent to the commencement of such chancery suit would take the
property subject to all the rights of the complainant asserted in the bill.
The record of title would not show the suit pending, nor would any one
examining the title look for it. The remedy is easy. A book should be
provided for the Recorder's office called the ' Lis pendens book,' in which
the titles of all such cases should be entered, together with the description
of the property sought to be reached, and the general nature of the claim
made against it; the bill to be a lien upon the property against all subse
quent purchasers only from the time of the record made in the ' Lis pen-
dens book.' That book, in searching titles, would then be examined as
much as mortgages. This is no new idea. The practice has prevailed in
the State of New York ever since 1850, and it ought to prevail here. Sup
pose you think of this. Yours very truly,
EMERY A. STORKS."
"December 7, 1874.
" FRIEND BOOMER,
"I suggest the following as matters for State legislation:
"i. Extending period of limitation in bribery cases. This already is
referred.
"2. Authorising preferring charges against officials. Already referred.
"3. Amendments to general law for incorporating cities and villages.
"4. Giving Governor power to remove Mayor for cause shown. This is
in harmony with the New York statute. ,
"5. To provide for recording chancery suits wnich seek to affect title to
real estate. Mr. MacVeagh understands what this is.
"6. Legislation with reference to funds in the hands of city or county
officials. The Gage case would seem to show the necessity for some legis
lation of this character.
"7. To restore to Judges of the Supreme Court power to grant writs of
habeas corpus in vacation. This is very important. My attention was
recently called to it by Judge McAllister. "Yours truly,
"STORRS."
In a series of letters to Mr. L. B. Boomer, during the month
of October 1874, he advocated petitioning the City Council to
call an election to determine the question whether the old city
charter should be abandoned, and the city government reorgan
ized under the general law. To this end he advised that a com
mittee of the Citizens' Association should prepare and circulate
petitions for signature by the voters of the city. At Mr. Boomer's
request, he prepared a form of petition, and in the letter enclos
ing it to him, October 5th, Mr. Storrs said:
32O LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
"I think it would be well to get copies of the poll lists, and perhaps to
get them printed, but the circulation of the petition need not be postponed
for that. As I have often said to you, this step is an indispensible prelimi
nary. All hands are agreed that we should reorganize under the general
law. How we shall reorganize, and what changes are to be made, should
undoubtedly be referred to the standing committee on municipal organiza
tion. I have no doubt but that committee will recommend action under the
general law ; indeed, there is no other practicable course. Mere patchwork
won't help us. .There must be a complete overhauling.
" Would it not be well also to refer the equalization law, as applied to
Chicago, to the committee on taxation, or perhaps State legislation, to report
as to the advisability of contesting it in the courts?"
Copies of the petition were printed, and placed in the hands
of responsible gentlemen for circulation to secure signatures. In
a short time 15,000 signatures were obtained, but the Council
refused to grant its prayer. In a letter to the editor of the
Times, Mr. Storrs thus commented on their action:
"The genuineness of the signatures can easily be shown. Each party
circulating a petition was required upon its return to mark it so that he
could recognize it, and be able to make his affidavit that all the signatures
were appended by the signers, or under their direction. These affidavits
affixed to the petition would settle the question as to the genuineness of
the signatures. Alderman Cullerton undertook to say that all the petitions
had fictitious signatures. He knows that this is not true. The petition
which I circulated is headed with the name of Potter Palmer and closed
with my own. I saw every party sign; and this is true of nearly all the
petitions."
In another letter to Mr. Boomer, October 23d, Mr. Storrs
suggests a reform which he had very much at heart, and which
has only since his death been in a measure accomplished under
the new election law:
"You will remember that at quite an early day in the history of the Citi
zens' Association of Chicago, we had up the subject of making some move
to transfer the voting places from saloons and drinking places to some dif
ferent quarters. The election is now near at hand, and the time for action,
if any is to be had, has arrived. Would it not be well for your committee
to make this request to the County Commissioners at once? I have been
called upon by Miss Frances E. Willard on this subject, and she will under
take to see that other places are furnished for each precinct, situated as
conveniently as the case can require."
For several months after the petition was presented and
refused, the association was at work perfecting a new city charter
and getting it passed through the Legislature. On the 3Oth
October, Mr. Storrs prepared a short statement of the benefits to
MUNICIPAL REFORM. 321
be gained from a reorganization under the general law, for the
columns of the Times, as follows:
"THE ECONOMY OF REORGANIZATION.
"Under our present complex and horribly confused system of collecting
taxes, the actual expenses of collecting the city taxes for the year 1872 were
187,416,99. This is exclusive of the large sums paid for the rent of offices
occupied by useless and worse than useless officials, and the very large
expenses of the legal department engaged in what so often p/oves an utterly
abortive attempt to enforce the collection and payment of these taxes.
"Moreover, since 1869 there has been actually lost of the taxes levied
and assessed under this clumsy, complicated, and wretchedly inefficient
system the sum of £2,500,000.
"These enormous expenses and losses could all be avoided under a
system having one head. In reorganizing the city government under the
general law, all this machinery can be swept away. City taxes can be
certified to the county clerk, and extended and collected as are the State
and county taxes. The countless barnacles who would be swept out of
their places by the new system will doubtless object to a reorganization
under the general law, on the ground of the expense attending an election ;
but the tax payers of Chicago, who have been plundered for years, will be
quite certain to seize hold of any opportunity to relieve themselv.es of the
burdens which they have so long and so patiently borne."
During the agitation of this question, a proposition was made
to constitute the city council in two chambers, analogous to the
upper and lower houses of our National and State legislatures.
In a letter to the editor of the Times, Mr. Storrs discusses this
proposition in his own inimitable way:
"December 11, 1874.
" Friend Matteson,
" I see you have a little discussion on your hands with Mr. Galloway
with reference to the infernal nonsense of two houses. I have recently
learned that Messrs. Hesing and Raster have both made propositions for
a suggestion to some of the committee to let up on the petition for reor
ganizing, and in some way to get a bill through this winter, providing for
two houses, the upper house to be made up of the representatives of tax
payers. I am not aware that this suggestion has been received with any
favor, and presume that it has not. But there seems to be a growing feel
ing in some quarters that tax-paying, or rather the ownership and posses
sion of something upon which taxes can be imposed, comprises ' the whole
duty of man.' I am constrained to think that there are very many persons
outside this charmed circle who have immortal souls, and can take and
are disposed to take quite as unselfish and intelligent a view of our real
public needs, as those inside. At all events, a second house elected by and
representing a particular class would be an abomination. Between it and
'21
322 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
the more popular body there would be continual jealousies and warfare;
neither would aid, but each would cripple, the other.
"If it be proposed to select better men for the upper house, the only
result would be to secure poorer ones for the lower; so that the average
badness would be faithfully preserved."
In another letter to the same gentleman he says:
"I send you herewith the January number (1875) of the North American
Review. Begin at page 166, and read ahead ; and if you don't come to
the conclusion that history repeats itself, I will confess my mistake. Observe
how the Citizens' Association of New York City was captured, page 169.
That charter was even better than the one proposed for us. In the Tweed
charter the Mayor did not have the appointment of the comptroller or the
corporation counsel. But read and be edified ; and then decide whether,
after all, virtue is not a matter of geography."
In the spring of 1875, the relations between Mr. Storrs and
some of the leading members of the Citizens' Association became
considerably strained in consequence of his perceiving one line
of professional duty in connection with an election question on
which he was professionally consulted, and they conceiving that
out of loyalty to them and to the Association he should have
construed the law in the opposite way. The Common Council
had appointed April 23, 1875, as the day on which the question
of the reorganization of the city government should be submitted
to a vote of the people. The election was characterized by the
most shameless frauds; wholesale ballot-box stuffing was resorted
to, and though it was claimed that the charter of 1872 was
defeated by three votes to one, the result of the count was to
give the* friends of that charter a majority.
The business men who were at the head of the Citizens' Asso
ciation were naturally indignant on finding that all their labor in
preparing and circulating petitions, and in securing votes for
reorganization, had been apparently thrown away, through the
trickery of politicians interested in the perpetuation of the old
system. Some aspiring young lawyers had lately become mem
bers of the association, with a keen scent for prospective business;
they all dreaded and disliked Mr. Storrs, because he was so much
their superior both in native gifts and legal learning that they
showed like pigmies beside him, saw him dominating councils in
which they were mere ciphers, and carrying propositions while
they could only sit by and gnash their teeth in sheepish silence.
These young lawyers advised their lay brethren of the association
MUNICIPAL REFORM. 323
to sue out an injunction to restrain the aldermen from counting
the votes. This rash advice was followed, and Judge Williams,
of the Circuit Court, issued the injunction. The aldermen called
for the advice of the corporation counsel, Judge Dickey, after
wards one of the Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of
Illinois. Judge Dickey engaged Mr. Storrs for consultation, with
the authority of the City Council ; and after a careful considera
tion of the statute, they both agreed that the statute was man
datory, leaving the aldermen no discretion in the matter. The
statute declares that the Council "shall" proceed to count the
votes. Judge Dickey and Mr. Storrs therefore concurred in
advising the aldermen to disregard the writ of injunction, inas
much as it was in their opinion illegal and therefore void, and to
go on and count the votes in obedience to the statute. Mr.
MacVeagh and his colleagues of the association could not under
stand that in giving this opinion Mr. Storrs was simply perform
ing a professional duty. They regarded his course as treason to
the association of which he was a member, and had been one of
the founders. From that time forth he and they went separate
ways, and the record books of the association were so written up
that to-day they contain no mention of Mr. Storrs' name, no
recognition of his services. The aldermen did proceed to count
the votes, and declared a result which exasperated the association
still more. Acting on the advice of the young lawyers already
mentioned, they obtained from Judge Williams a rule upon Judge
Dickey, Mr. Storrs, and the aldermen to show cause why they
should not be punished for contempt, the latter for disobeying
his writ, and the two former for counselling such disobedience.
When the case came on for hearing, the dingy little room in the
old "rookery" in which Judge Williams held his court was
crowded almost to suffocation. On both sides several counsel
had been retained, who spoke at great length, Mr. Storrs closing
for the defence, and Judge C. B. Lawrence, a former Justice of
the Illinois Supreme Court, making the final argument in reply
to him for the prosecution. Mr. Pence, then a young and com
paratively unknown member of the Chicago bar, had delivered
what one of the city papers called " a flowery oration on the
majesty of the law," demanding that each alderman be sent to
jail for six months and fined a thousand dollars, while he fixed a
324 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
much higher punishment as the just desert of the presumptuous
counsel who had given them such bad advice. Mr. Storrs' reply
was reported as follows:
•*I am free to confess I should have been exceedingly gratified to have
been given the privilege of a little lapse of time after the close of the
remarkable harangue to which your honor, ourselves, and the audience have
listened. Its effect upon me — not perhaps so much upon my mind as upon
my nerves — is quite inexplicable. [Laughter.] How to answer it, for that
seems to be the duty which has been assigned to me, imposes an obligation
to me probably the most serious, the most difficult at all events, that I have
ever undertaken to perform. For where there has been so much fancy
mixed up with the facts, and so large an amount of what is absolutely dull
and prosaic stirred in with the fancy, it is extremely difficult to separate these
incongruous elements from each other, and to tell where the fancy begins
and the facts leave off. [Laughter.] It is like requiring a man to answer
a loud noise. [Renewed laughter.] It is like requiring me to reply deliber
ately to a gong. [Laughter.] There are various styles of oratory, if your
honor please. There are various styles of literary composition. There are
various styles of architecture ; and a very excellent old lady in this city,,
several years since, in looking at the old spotted Presbyterian church, down
here, declared it was the finest specimen of ' cathartic ' architecture she
had ever seen. [Loud laughter.] I have been bothered in my mind as to
the kind of oratory to which we have just been listening, but I accept oui
good old lady's definition; and judging of it from its effects on the system,
I should say it was one of the best specimens of • cathartic ' oratory that I
have ever heard. [Universal laughter in the court-room.] Possibly I am
incorrect about that. I have listened, when I was a boy, to fanning-mills
as they were kept safely housed in the barn, and as we turned the crank,
I remember how much noisier the fanriing-mill was when it was empty, than
when it was full. [Laughter.] Now, would you require me to reply to a fan-
ning-mill? I am expected to reply to one. [More laughter.] Worse than
a fanning-mill, because there was nothing that issued from that harmless
machine, the representative of agricultural industry, that was not absolutely
innoxious unless the hens had gathered about it. [Loud laughter.] But
from this machine that has been running here for the last two hours, there
has been a good deal of insolent criticism ; a good deal of foul talk ; a good
deal of ungenerous and indecent commentary ; a good deal of what is abso
lutely untrue.
" I had hoped, your honor, that this case might be tried fairly. I could see
nothing in it when the argument began, nor could I see anything in
it when the rule was served and these proceedings were inaugur
ated, that ought to take it out of the ordinary range of judicial controversy.
The question which this record presents, and the argument which this rule
necessarily involves, are not personal questions. They are questions of
law ; not, indeed, unmixed with public considerations, but they are known,
after all, as questions of law ; and if there is any point to which a lawyer
MUNICIPAL REFORM. 325
should industriously strive, if there is any goal which the bench ought
industriously to seek to achieve, it is, in the discussion and determination
of legal questions, to throw over our shoulders, as completely as we would
a garment for which we had no use, every element of personal feeling, and
to pluck from our hearts and drive from our judgments every element of
passion, or prejudice, or bias which by any earthly possibility might find
lodgment there. If this was to be regarded as in any sense a personal ques
tion, it would have been in order for myself, and for my associates who
have addressed, and who will hereafter address your honor, to make some
observations with reference to the personal relations which have for many
years past subsisted between us. But it has seemed to me so utterly imper
sonal, that observations of that character appeared to me to be hardly in
order. If they were, no one would seize the opportunity with greater pleas
ure than myself to say to your honor that from the earliest period when I
commenced the practice of law in this city down to to-day, I have never
received at the hands of the distinguished judge who presides here to-day
anything except the politest and kindest attentions, for which I have ever
been duly grateful; and they have been and always will be among the
pleasantest recollections of a professional life, otherwise somewhat stony and
somewhat dusty, as we all find it in this career which we have pursued.
"I am glad for the present — I shall have occasion to recur to it again —
to get out of this foul atmosphere of personal vituperation and attack. I
shall content myself with saying, that the defendants in this case are law
yers, myself among the number, and twenty-two aldermen of this city. The
reputations of these gentlemen are not involved here. They would not shirk
the discussion of these questions if they were involved. Their degree, of
culture, to which some reference has been made, is not involved here.
May I ask where the learned counsel who has just addressed the court got
his credentials to talk to anybody about culture? [Laughter.] In what
school of culture has he been reared? From what school of culture did he
graduate? What diploma does he hold, that justifies him in assailing twenty-
two of the representatives of this city on the ground of culture ? If your honor
please, there is nothing so insolent in this world as the insolence of pinch
beck and Peter-Funk culture ;' sham culture; paraded culture; boasted cul
ture; culture that comes by sitting on a book, or leaning against a college
wall ; [Laughter] — the culture of observation merely, that comes in by pres
sure, and goes out by perspiration. [Loud laughter.]
"After some further remarks on the law of the case, Mr. Storrs stated
that he was much fatigued on account of late and unavoidable labor the
night previous, and he would esteem it a favor if the court would adjourn
and allow him to resume in the morning. The court then adjourned to
ten A. M."
By way of introduction to its report of the proceedings on the
following day, a local paper said:
"The fact that Mr. Storrs was to continue his argument in the
contempt case, filled the court-room to overflowing yesterday
326 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
morning. His address did not partake so much of the humorous
as was expected. It was a clear, masterly effort, and dealt with
the legal points involved with great force. Every one appeared
carried away with the arguments. Mr. Storrs' gift of repartee
showed itself frequently. Indeed, the audience kept hoping for
interruptions, in order that the distinguished counsel might have
an opportunity for saying a smart thing. When he concluded,
Messrs. Goudy aud Tuley intimated that the ground had been so
completely covered that they would waive their right to address
the court — a great compliment to their colleague, but one which
he richly deserved."
When the court opened at ten o'clock, Mr. Storrs continued
his argument for the defendants.
" He could not but express his obligations, he said, to the Court for the
kindness extended to him the previous evening, which he would endeavor
to repay by as rapid a presentation of the points he proposed to discuss as
was consistent with what he deemed to be his duty with reference to the
interests of his clients and himself. He thought he had closed that branch
of the case which involved the point as to the waver of contempt. He
thought he had demonstrated from the authorities that when an order had
emanated from the court of chancery and had been disobeyed, any step
taken by the complainants in the bill was a waiver of the right to insist on
any penalty for such disobedience. He had undertaken to demonstrate
that this rule rested upon solid foundations of reason, that it was not con
fined merely to cases where the party was in contempt for having refused
to answer, but that the law had been expressly declared that the same
rule referred to the disobedience of ;\ny order issued by a court of chan
cery. The various authorities to which he had referred covered every
ground which human ingenuity could possibly conceive of as constituting a
waiver of the alleged contempt, and that this case embraced not only one
of the cases which had been referred to in the authorities, but it involved
every step which could possibly be taken by complainants, even down to
the practical dismissal of the bill and abandonment of the case itself. The
supplemental bill, which was but a prop to the original one, and which
went back and stated facts intended to support the averments of the orig
inal bill, which asked for a new injunction of the same character as that
prayed for in the original bill, which was filed by the same complainants
and against the same defendants in the original bill, which was voluntarily
dismissed. It was an incorrect statement of the fact to say that all the
effects sought to be derived from the injunction were destroyed by its dis
obedience, for the injunction was not only to restrain the Common Coun
cil from canvassing the votes and declaring the result, but from taking any
steps by which the legality of that election should be recognized, by which
the re-incorporation of the city, under the act of 1872, could be construed
MUNICIPAL REFORM.
as adopted in any way. Such an injunction was prayed for by the original
bill, and it was to continue such injunction that arguments, extending over
two days, were made, and if it was true that all the purposes sought by
the original bill were destroyed by its disobedience, it was curious com
plainants had not discovered that fact earlier and saved the time of the
court.
"The discussion of the question of jurisdiction involved two considerations;
whether the court had jurisdiction of the subject matter of the bill, and
whether the court had the power to issue the writ. There was no necessity
for citing authorities in support of the proposition that an injunction impro
perly or irregularly granted must be obeyed. They all conceded that.
The point which they made, however, was that where a process emanates
from a court having no jurisdiction over the subject-matter of the suit, or
if such jurisdiction was not jurisdictional power to issue the process, then
the process was an entire nullity, and exacted obedience from no one, and
a refusal to comply with its mandates could not by any possibility be con
strued into contempt. As to whether the court had jurisdiction over the
subject-matter, two questions were presented : First, what was the relief
prayed for in the bill, and second, upon what statement of facts is that
relief prayed ? If the court could not in any event grant the relief, it was
because it lacked the power: in other words, had no jurisdiction over the
subject-matter. His Honor was asked to intervene and prevent the action
of a political body in canvassing returns, in the making of which they had
no hand, and declaring the result. In answer to these questions, they said
that the bill averred no irreparable injury from the canvassing and declaring
the result; no such averment could in any earthly possibility be true if
made, because the evil which might result could be relieved by one of two
modes — by quo wqrranto or by contesting the election. And he suggested
further that while all evils of machinery or otherwise that might flow from
canvassing the result might thus.be corrected, that by the act of 1872 no
single power was conferred upon the council in addition to that which it
already possessed under the old charter. Secondly, they claimed that not
only this bill did not aver the existence of any irreparable injury, but that
no bill could be framed in which such a statement could be truthfully
made, and if any bill could be possibly framed to secure the relief
prayed for, complainants were without remedy at law. Thirdly, the duty
of canvassing the votes and declaring the result was imposed on defend
ants by law, and they were bound to perform it. On the point of the
general jurisdiction of a court of equity counsel on the other side
had traveled somewhat into history and referred his Honor to the
celebrated case of Lord Holt, as exhibiting the distinguished heroism of
a great judge in resisting the assumptions of the British House of Commons.
History was useful ; it was philosophy teaching by example ; but distorted
and misstated history was a kind of culture which neither the counsel nor
the other defendants in the case possessed. Mr. Pence stated that the case
to which he referred was a contested election case. It was nothing of the
kind. A chancery question could never have come before Lord Holt, for
328 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
he was not Lord Chancellor but Lord Chief Justice, who presided in the
courts of law, and had no more power over chancery cases than a British
barber or a British sergeant. Politics ran high in Great Britain at that time.
The parties were the Whigs and the Tories. The case to which reference
was made was the Ashley case, which was by no means a contested elec
tion case. They were in the habit, in those rotten boroughs, of making
corrupt and fraudulent returns, and one of the most corrupt returns was
made from Aylesbury. Parties who suffered therefrom, knew it was vain to
petition the House of Commons, and it was resolved to bring action in the
Court of King's Bench, against the returning officer. Ashley clearly made out
his case, and recovered his verdict with large damages. It was an action
brought by a private citizen against an officer, to recover damages for ille
gally refusing to receive his vote. He could but wonder at that amaz
ing ingenuity, at that remarkable draught power which could pull a case
of that character out of its legitimate niche in the history of jurispru
dence, and try to fit it in a place where it never was intended to
belong.
"Judge Lawrence (interposing) said it might not be very important, but
he did think that was not a perfectly fair statement of his colleague's position.
Mr. Pence spoke of that case as a case growing out of an election, and
where the privileges of the House of Commons on the one side and the
power of court on the other were the questions involved ; and as showing
the anxiety of the courts of England to maintain their judicial authority
against the interference of the House of Commons. He did not speak of
it as a bill in chancery, or as having a direct bearing in its legal principles
on the question now in dispute.
"Mr. Storrs — 'I have two replies to make to that, first on the fact and
next on the inference. Mr. Pence did, in express language, refer to the
case as a contested election case, in which the House of Commons was
involved, explicitly and unmistakably.'
"Mr. Pence^'I said it was a contest growing out of an election.'
" Mr Storrs— 'I think not. Whether it has any relevancy to the issue here
is a matter for Mr. Pence to settle, and not for myself. My objection to it
upon that ground did not refer merely to that authority ; it is chronic with
all the cases which counsel has cited, and applies to them all as well.'
"Mr Storrs said he would leave history and general literature and pro
ceed to the next authority cited by Mr. Pence, as illustrating the general
jurisdiction of courts of equity over cases of that character. (Kerr vs,.
Draco.) After exhausting this, knocking the ground completely from under
the feet of complainants, he went on to consider the cases in which injunc
tions had been issued by courts of chancery, showing that in every instance
mere property rights were involved. Under the plain mandate of the statute
the Council might have been compelled by mandamus to canvass the
returns, and the Clerk compelled to record the result ; and he challenged
counsel to produce a single case so monstrous in its character, where a
court of equity could restrain a Common Council from doing that which the
highest judicial power in the State would intervene to compel them to do.
MUNICIPAL REFORM.
Suppose they had undertaken to avoid the performance of this duty on the
ground that illegal votes were cast, the reply of the Supreme Court would
have been: 'You are not the judge of that; it is your duty to canvass:'
and a demurrer to the return would have been sustained. It was insisted
there had been no election. In the bill, however, these words appeared:
' Your orators further show that an election was held in the city of Chi
cago, in conformity with such resolution,' etc. The emergencies of the
case seemed to demand now that they should come up in court and insist
no election was held. Besides, they had filed petitions in every court in
the city, averring that an election was held and undertaking to contest its
validity. The dilemma in which complainants were placed was this: They
insisted his Honor had jurisdiction over the bill on the ground, first, that
the election was void, and, next, that it was illegal, because of the casting
of fradulent votes. They could be taken upon either horn of the dilemma.
If void, quo warranto was the legal remedy ; if fraudulent, the election could
be contested. The law was to be obeyed by the Common Council, not
withstanding a mandate of the court to the contrary.
"The Court — 'Do you mean to state that as a universal principle?'
"Mr. Storrs — 'Yes, sir; to which there is no exception. That, where there
is a conflict between the plain mandate of the law and the mandate of a
judge the law must be obeyed.'
"The Court — 'Supposing there is no law?'
"Mr. Storrs — 'Then there would be no judge.' [Laughter.]
"The Court — 'Supposing the pretended law had never been adopted?'
"Mr. Storrs— r' Then settle that question by quo warranto.'
"The Court — 'I simply wanted to get your opinion.'
"Mr. Storrs — 'I have conferred a lasting benefit on these gentlemen, and
have received no pay for it. [Laughter.] I stated on a former occasion
that the bill ought to have been entitled, 'A bill in search of information, as
to the mode of contesting an election.' ' [Renewed laughter:]
"Judge Lawrence — 'We will have to pass a vote of thanks, any way.'
" Mr. Storrs, after quoting several opinions, held that the writ of injunc
tion was void, and a party could not disobey a void writ. The whole logic
of the entire controversy was crystallized in that single phrase — a party
could not disobey a void writ. The functions of courts were to preserve
rights and prevent wrongs, and they had no right to interpose to prevent
the discharge of a clearly imposed duty. If courts reached that measure
of power and proposed to exercise it anarchy had been reached, and they
had infinitely better go back to the old barefooted condition of Hercules
with his club, so eloquently referred to by Mr. Pence, when the weak chil
dren were slaughtered, and none but the strong were allowed to live.
Take the Forty-eighth Illinois, which tore the question of jurisdiction, on
the ground of the election being void, up by the roots ; add to it the two
cases from the Sixty-first and Sixty-second Illinois, which wiped out the
pretense that a court of equity could intervene to prevent public officers
performing a duty, and the discussion might rest and the case close. Mr.
St-oiTs then cited the law imposing the duty of canvassing on the Council,
33O LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
in order to show its peremptory nature. He continued : The law said to
the City Council, 'You shall canvass and you shall cause to be recorded.'
But then came the writ of injunction and said: 'You shall not.' Doubt-
ingly, inquiringly the Council considered which should be obeyed. Should
it be the law, with all its poetic thunder, or should it be the court, who
carried the keys of the county jail? There was no question; these two
directions were absolutely irreconcilable. There was no earthly way in which
the Council could effect a compromise. If they obeyed the court they dis
obeyed the law, and, if they obeyed the law they disobeyed the court.
There was no middle ground, and they disobeyed the court; and in doing
that did they violate or perform their duty? The Sixty-first Illinois provided
that the court as well as inferior officers must be governed by law, and
that when the law imposed a duty upon a public functionary, and the court
commanded him not to perform it, he must obey the law and disobey the
writ of the court. They bowed before the majesty of the law, as repre
sented by the highest tribunal of the State, and in doing that they respected
this court in an infinitely higher degree than if they had shirked the per
formance of their duty. No human ingenuity could suggest a case where a
court of equity had interfered to restrain the performance of a legal act.
He hoped that day would never come when, falling from their high position,
from passion, prejudice, or haste, any judicial tribunal should undertake to
do that. Much had been said of the dreadful examples flowing from the
disobedience of judicial orders. He was impressed quite as clearly as the
distinguished counsel for complainants could be with the supreme import
ance of obeying all judicial mandates, but the dangers which threatened us
did not proceed from violations of injunctions. That offence when commit
ted cojuld be subjected to swift, severe, and condign punishment. But if
there was any danger which especially threatened private and public rights, it
was from the extension of this power of issuing writs of injunction ; if
there was any danger, to the extension and enlargement of which wise men
looked with apprehension, it was the growing tendency of courts to interfere
by the exercise of this great power. Mr. Pence said the courts were clothed
with sovereign power ; but his Honor never claimed that, and never would.
There was no sovereignty in a court ; there never was, and never would be.
There was no danger to be apprehended from void writs. They had only
to travel down to the sea coast, to the city of New York, where they could
see by example where the danger lay ; where the air was black on every
occasion of panic or great political excitement with mandatory writs ; where
the practice had been carried to the beautiful extent of one judge
enjoining another, and then a third judge enjoining the other two ;
[laughter] where injunctions were part of the machinery of commerce;
where stock-brokers had writs of injunction to carry on their business,
and deem them as necessary parts of their furniture as their tables and
chairs ; where politicians carry elections, secure offices, prevent defeat,
and overcome calamities by the convenient process of injunction. But
we were not driven to such straits, and it was to the glory and credit
of the judiciary of this city that in no case to his knowledge had an
MUNICIPAL REFORM. 331
injunction been issued where its issue was attributed to improper motives
on the part fof the Judge. Judges had erred here, but the errors had
been errors of judgment, which the courts themselves had been the first
to seize the opportunity to correct. There could be no doubt the Coun
cil had the right to pass upon the question of the legality of the writ.
They had to determine for themselves whether his Honor had jurisdic
tion or not. They took the risk of deciding correctly. If they decided that
his Honor had no jurisdiction, and it turned out that they agreed with his
Honor, certainly those poor defendants couJd not be punished for deciding
a legal question correctly. They rested their case on the ground that the
writ was void, and that the court had no jurisdiction over the subject-mat
ter, and for these grounds he trusted his Honor would retrace the steps
which had so far been taken ; to presume otherwise, to wish otherwise, to
presume that an erroneous course would for any cause be persisted in, was
an insult to and contempt of the court which neither of the defendants
answering this rule purposed to be guilty of. The answers of the Alder
men had been accepted as true ; they were true. He would not pause here
to characterize the unmanly and indecent assault that had been made upon
them. Those gentlemen needed no vindication at his hands. Counsel (Mr.
Pence) could have but very little respect for the court, for the protection of
whose dignity he seemed to be so anxious, who would violate every rule of
private decency and professional decorum to travel far out of the
boundaries of the record to denounce his superiors as perjurers and
falsifiers. Nothing had occurred during the proceedings to justify that
assault upon the Council of this city. If the Mayor was guilty of any
wrong, and if he assisted and urged the violation of the injunction, why
not come manfully forward and make him a defendant, instead of taking
advantage of counsel's privilege to administer a cowardly insult. It w^s
curious that from the beginning to the end this case seemed to be
absolutely leprous-spotted all over with circumstances of suspicion. He
believed that this bill, or its original conceiver, was conceived in iniquity.
Pretending to desire honest contest of election and fair investigation they
filed a bill which^ asked that the government of the city should be sus
pended in mid air, and that the result of the election should never be
reached or declared. The contents of papers had not been fairly stated ;
and, finally, whether owing to the surroundings or some other cause,
counsel had dared to suggest to his Honor the measure of punishment
which should be inflicted— six months in jail, and £1,000 fine each would
only satisfy his royal pleasure.
"Upon what meat doth this our Caesar feed
That he has grown so great ?
"Talk about contempt of court when counsel would endeavor to
thrust himself into the judicial seat and dictate the terms of punishment
and its measure ! The answers defendants made were manly and truth
ful answers. They -had stated that they meant no personal disrespect to
the court. The answer was conclusive and his Honor believed it. Were
332 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
they to bandy words of apology and explanation? They would respect
their own personal dignity and the dignity of the court, but beyond that
pale they did not propose one single step to tread. With regard to him
self and colleagues he hardly knew what to say. By the plain mandate
of the law the Corporation Counsel was obliged to give his opinion when,
ever asked by the city. Should he shirk the performance of that duty ?
And, if he gave that opinion, how should he give it? Give it as the
Citizens' Association would like; give it as it might be agreeable to his
Honor; or give it as his opinion really was? What was their position?
They were counselors of this court, members of a high, noble profession
— a free, liberal-spirited, and proud profession. On them the most solemn
duties devolved. It was their duty, whenever their opinion was solicited
by their clients, to give their opinion, and to give the opinion which they
entertained. Whatever other sins might be laid at his door, he would pluck
his heart from his bosom before, when called upon for the performance of
a duty of that character, he would shirk one single particle from its
performance, even if the terrors of all the judges that had ever sat on
the thrones of the highest judicial benches were flaunted in his face.
The dignity of the courts ought to be respected, but in parallel lines
with that dignity ran the dignity of the profession. They asked no
favors. They said this, and his Honor quite well understood it, in no
spirit of bravado. They accepted no mercy tendered to them by the
counsel. They placed themselves upon the broad platform of their rights;
it was a foundation strong as the eternal rocks, and, standing there, all
the gates of hell should not prevail against them."
Judge Williams, of course, upheld his own writ, and fined the
Aldermen $100 each and the Corporation Counsel and his associ
ates $300 each for disobeying it. The case was appealed to the
Supreme Court, who, equally of course, reversed Judge Wil
liams' decision. So ended a farce in which the Citizens' Associ
ation and their then inexperienced legal advisers only covered them
selves with deserved ridicule. But the bitter feeling it occa
sioned on the part of many of its prominent commercial mem
bers against Mr. Storrs never was and never has been allayed;
and it accounts for many of the dastardly attacks upon Mr.
Storrs' reputation and memory which were covertly made in
Chicago circles in his lifetime, and have not ceased with his
sudden and untimely death. From that time on, Mr. Storrs and
the Citizens' Association "walked no more together." By the
petulance of its business element, and the intrigues of its legal
element, it lost the ablest counsellor and brightest member it
ever had; and the result is well marked in its subsequent his
tory as the association has done nothing of any practical value.
CHAPTER XX.
PRACTICAL TEMPERANCE LEGISLATION.
THE DRINKING HABIT NOT UNCOMMON AMONG THE EARLY SETTLERS OF
CHICAGO— A CHANGE AFTER THE FIRE OF 1 87 1— MR. STORRS BECOMES AN
ABSTAINER AND AN APOSTLE — WHAT THE " TIMES " THOUGHT OF HIS CON
VERSION — TWO TEMPERANCE SPEECHES — CORRESPONDENCE ON PROHIBITION
— HE BECOMES ONE OF THE FOUNDERS OF THE CITIZENS* LEAGUE FOR THE
SUPPRESSION OF THE SALE OF LIQUOR TO MINORS — APOSTROPHE TO WATER.
IN the early days, when Mr. Storrs first came to Chicago, the
drinking habit was not looked upon by any very influential
class with such disfavor as it is universally regarded with to-day.
The efforts of temperance men and women were attended with
a measure of success which discouraged many of them, and the
more zealous advocates of the cause began to be impatient of
the slow results of moral suasion. Those were the days when
even the President's New Year receptions were attended and
followed with convivialities often carried beyond the bounds of
decorum ; when it was no uncommon sight to see an intoxicated
member of Congress upon the floor during its sessions, or an
eminent lawyer undertaking to try a case in court while visibly
under the influence of liquor ; when New Year calls, even among
the ''best people," frequently resulted in the popular man of
society who had an extended list of acquaintances getting
oblivious before night, and waking to repentance next morning.
Chicago had not yet outgrown village customs. Its populace
were pioneers, whose enterprise was drawing after them the
greater part of that band of immigrants from the old world who
had started with the vague notion that America was the land of
prosperity, but whose ideas of American geography were hazy, —
333
334
LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
Chicago lot having as yet found a place on European maps.
They brought with them, of course, the notions of individual
freedom and the social customs of the countries from whence
they came. It may well be imagined that there was little con
ventionality about the early settlers of Chicago, and that its
select society was not numerous. The members of its infant
Board of Trade, — whose gigantic progress Mr. Storrs recapitu
lated in an exhaustive speech at the opening of their magnifi
cent ne^ hall in April 1885, — were pretty generally drinking
men; and in fact there was no strong and decided sentiment on
the question in Chicago until after the fire of 1871. That, in
more senses than one, was indeed a fire of purification.
Mr. Storrs was a keen observer, an acute judge of men. He
quickly saw that the times had changed; that merchants were
inquiring more strictly into the habits of their clerks, and that
business men were beginning to look askance even at a brilliant
barrister who had been seen in a bar room. He determined for
himself to abandon altogether the use of intoxicating beverages
in any form. That he did so from purely prudential motives,
and as a measure of business necessity, while not entitling him
to rank high among the apostles of the temperance cause, is
nevertheless creditable to his sound judgment and firm will. At
no time of his life did he indulge in the use of intoxicants to
such an extent as to rank among the grovelling victims of Circe's
cup. In this as in other things, he preserved his self-respect, and
demeaned himself like a gentleman. But he saw that under the
new business arrangements of the reconstructed city, a reputation
for drinking was sufficient to ruin the ablest man who had to
depend upon his brains for a living, and, without any parade, he
became an abstainer.
Earnest in all his convictions, Mr. Storrs had in him the spirit
of a missionary. Had he not been so able and successful a law
yer, he would undoubtedly have been a famous journalist ; with
his earnestness and resolute energy in proclaiming his convictions,
he could, had his inclinations tended that way, have been a lead
ing presbyter of the church in which he was reared. He at once
lent his powerful eloquence to the service of the temperance
cause which he had espoused. That the temperance men and
women of Illinois were glad and proud to hail such a coadjutor,
PRACTICAL TEMPERANCE LEGISLATION. 335
"goes without saying." In June, 1874, Mr. Storrs addressed a
large and enthusiastic meeting in the First Baptist Church,
Chicago, and the Times headed its report with lines which were
significant of the importance attached to his adhesion to the
cause of temperance reform. The headlines were : — " Rum Must
Succumb. Its Doom was Sealed when E. A. Storrs Joined the
Crusaders. Remarks of this Eloquent Temperance Apostle at a
Meeting on Yesterday." An announcement that the meeting
would be a sort of parting love-feast of the old-time abolitionists
who had just concluded a reunion in Chicago, and who, having
finished the work of abolishing slavery, had now turned their
attention to that of abolishing strong drink, drew a large number
to the meeting. Mr. Storrs presided, and here made his maiden
temperance speech, and it was brief. On taking the chair, he
said :
" It is eminently fitting and proper that the old abolitionists, who for years
bravely fought against one form of slavery, having at last nobly triumphed,
should, instead of laying down their arms and declaring their labors at an
end, devote their energies to the extirpation of slavery which exists in
another form hardly less disastrous in its consequences than that from which
four millions of people have but recently been relieved. Their efforts are
not now limited to the blacks alone, for there are to-day in this country
millions, both black and white, old and young, men and women, held in the
bondage of strong drink, and whose liberation it is the great problem of
the hour to secure.
"It is no part of my present purpose to dilate upon the evils of intem
perance, nor the measureless calamities which it visits not only upon
its immediate victim but upon society at large. So familiar are we with
them, and so constantly are they brought to our attention, that we may all
be said to know them by heart. Differing from the old form of what we
called African slavery, no one has been found shame-faced enough to
claim that in drunkenness there is any merit ; that it is anything other or
else than an unmixed evil and a curse. In the old days of the anti-slavery
contest, men did urge that slavery was a divine institution, and they
appealed to the Bible to prove it. Yet while they appealed to Noah's
curse of Ham as a reason why Ham's descendants should be held in per
petual slavery, and pointed to Noah's curse as a proper example for us to
follow, they stopped there, and, so far as I know, never urged us to
indulge in the juice of the grape to the extent which it is recorded that
Noah did ; never urged us to voluntarily place ourselves in the position
which he did, and never pointed to his conduct immediately preceding the
pronouncing of the curse as an example for us to follow.
"There can be no debate as to the evils of intemperance. There are no
336 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
two sides to the question. Intemperance has no victim so besotted that he
will not readily admit, and who does not himself fully understand and
appreciate all that you can say to him on that point. For years statis
tics have been showered upon them, showing the frightful consequences of
the course they pursue, and yet we seem no nearer converting than
twenty years ago. Statutes have proved unavailing. Laws, the most rig
orous in their character, have failed to accomplish the results which were
anticipated. Even when the rum-shop was closed, the appetite for alco
holic drink, and from which the rum-shop thrived, was not appeased.
"The problem, therefore, which confronts us to-day is not whether intem
perance is an evil, which ought to be exterminated, for that is admitted,
but, How shall this gigantic evil be corrected, and its spread be prevented?
"We may probably never hope on this earth to reach the time when no
man will drink ; we shall probably never live to see the day when no man
will steal. There will always be those whose appetites are beyond legislative
control, as there will always be those who will appropriate their neighbor's
property even with the perils of the penitentiary staring them full in the
face. But we may, without ranking drunkards and thieves together,
reasonably expect to see the day when the number of drunkards and thieves
shall be greatly lessened.
"Rigorous statutes, alone, will not produce either of these results. But
a few years since, larceny was in Great Britain punished by death. But
the number of larcenies was then greater in proportion to the population
than it now is. No statute avails much which is very far in advance
of public sentiment. It remains in such cases a dead letter upon the
statute book. The creation of a public sentiment in harmony with the
statute must, if it is to be efficacious, always precede the statute. And
here is a magnificent field in which temperance reformers may well be
delighted to work. Here may be invoked those social agencies more
powerful than any mere legislation, but which, when working in harmony
with it, is irresistible. The slave to strong drink is a voluntary one.
And so long as he can hug the chains of his bondage and still receive
social recognition, just so long will he continue. When the day comes,
as I believe it will come, that society frowns upon drunkenness as a
crime, we are not very far from final success, and all necessary laws
can be easily enforced.
"In such a contest thus waged, the women of the country will nec
essarily take* a most important part. I do not say conspicuous — it may
be so, it may not; but the influences, great or otherwise, which they
may exert in the way of reformation and prevention are incalculable.
"Unlike the war against African slavery, this great contest is not
waged with carnal weapons. No blow of bugle or roll of drum calls
the great army of temperance reform to the battle. No smoking cities
nor desolated homes mark its progress. It comes not to destroy, but to
save. Its weapons are love and charity to all. Smiling fields and happy
homes, and God-fearing and law-abiding men and women are the traces
which this great army leaves behind it.
PRACTICAL TEMPERANCE LEGISLATION. 337
"There is no poor slave to alcohol sunk so low but that some tender
heart will lift him up, bind up his wounds, pour words of hope and
consolation in his ear. God bless such a movement. Its purity of pur
pose touches every human heart, and receives the sanction of heaven.
For He who died for all has said, ' Inasmuch as ye have done it
unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.' '
In October 1874, Mr. Storrs addressed a large and enthusias
tic meeting in the Second Baptist Church, Chicago, and the
practical bent of his mind was clearly shown in the suggestions
which he made in the course of that address. After a few words
of encouragement to temperance workers who were despondent
because their efforts had not been attended with the success
they hoped for, he said :
"All great reforms, and particularly those of a moral and social
character, are slowly wrought out. The habits fastened upon men by
long years of indulgence are not at once eradicated, and when, however
vicious and hurtful they may be, their damaging nature has been thoroughly
established, when the whole world is convinced that indulgence in them
is sinful and hurtful, the real labor has but just commenced. For the
correction of evil habits, something besides arguments or mere appeals
to the understanding is required. The judgment once convinced, the
public must be educated fully up to the standard of the argument. No
argument, however conclusive and convincing, ever eradicated even
serious errors in belief. The belief in witchcraft lingered long years after its
absurdities and cruelties had been thoroughly exposed and demonstrated. No
one can tell precisely when the world ceased to believe in witches, for the
reason that human intelligence outgrew the belief, and mankind had
finally so far advanced that the very atmosphere was unfavorable to it.
This growth, however, was slow. But in the fullness of time it came to
pass that this belief, which was infantile in its intellectual character,
could not adjust itself to, and was sadly out of harmony with, the more
manly intellect of the age, and so it dropped from the shoulders of the
more highly civilized generation as noiselessly and as naturally as the
grown man renounces the garments of his youth. In the early days of
the temperance movement arguments seemed necessary, and they were
abundantly furnished. Facts and statistics, showing the incalculable mis
chiefs which resulted from the use of strong drink, were supplied with
out stint. Appeals, the most persuasive and eloquent in their character,
were heard from every pulpit and platform in the country.
"At that time arguments, facts, statistics, appeals, were necessary. The
judgments of men had first to be convinced, and I think we may safely
say that the time has arrived when every one is convinced. There are no
longer doubters, the old weapons of argument may now, in a great measure,
be laid aside, for the warfare is transferred to another field where other
instruments must be employed.
99
LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
"The question now is, having convinced the understandings of men, How
shall that conviction of the understanding be made to act upon the
conduct of men? In other words, How shall the man who freely admits
that drunkenness is a sin, that it is a curse unmixed and unmitigated,
exhibit that belief in his ' daily walk and conversation ?' The real object
which we seek to attain is not, after all, good doctrine so much as it is
good works. The man who to-day fully agrees with all that you may
say, and would thoroughly believe all that you may say, as to the destruc
tive and baleful consequences of drunkenness, but, nevertheless, reels home
in drunken stupor to-morrow, is not reformed up to our standard of the
necessities of the case. Something is gained, it is true, when we have
convinced him that he ought to lead a sober life, but he is then only
half reformed, and the reformation is completed only when, as a result
of that balief, he actually does lead a sober life."
He then discussed the subject of moderate drinking, and the
question whether the adulteration of alcoholic liquors with poison
ous substances was not to a large extent the cause of so much
drunkenness.
" I have said that no more argument seemed to be required. In this,
perhaps, to a certain extent, I am in error. While every one admits
the evils of intemperance, yet many claim that moderate drinking, as
it is called, is quite justifiable. I know no more treacherous and delu
sive phrase, than that of 'moderate drinking.' Who will prescribe what
is moderate and what is not? I presume we would be told that the
use of liquor, whether moderate or not, must be determined by its
effects, and so long as a man succeeds in stopping just this side of actual
intoxication he is a moderate drinker. In other words, when it operates
solely on the stomach, its use is moderate, but when its effects are trans
ferred to the brain it becomes immoderate. Thus you see the dividing line
has to be very finely and very closely drawn, and one of the difficulties
attending this very fine piece of self-examination, results from the fact that
these observations are made by the party who is affected by the use of
the stimulant, and trespassing one step too far in his experiments upon
himself, the brain will probably be reached before the operator is fully
aware of the fact, and so far affected that the work of analysis will not be
very satisfactorily performed.
"Thus it is apparent that moderate drinking reduced to actual prac
tice is attended with very great danger. The drinking may be very mod
erate up to a certain point, but beyond that, becomes exceedingly immod
erate. The fact is that an indulgence in the use of intoxicating liquors
to any extent which may result in intoxication is immoderate. The use
of any poison not actually required for some medicinal purpose is immod
erate. One would hardly think of a moderate use of laudanum as a
beverage, nor would he who insisted that we should totally abstain from
its use as a beverage be denounced as an impracticable fanatic.
" The logic of the whole question would seem to be this. That drunk-
PRACTICAL TEMPERANCE LEGISLATION. 339
enness is a sin and an evil is admitted. That anything which naturally
tends to produce it should be avoided is admitted. That the moderate
use of alcoholic drinks tends to their excessive use; that it begets a
morbid and unnatural appetite, which will ultimately pass beyond control,
will hardly be disputed. There can, therefore, be no real nor genuine
safety save in total abstinence. There may be, there perhaps are men of
such strong wills, such iron nerves, such phlegmatic temperaments, such
absolutely balanced brains, and such vigorous stomachs as to be able day
after day to march safely up to the border line which divides sobriety from
drunkenness, and, withstanding all allurements, never cross the line. But
such men certainly are very rare, and so few are they that as exceptions
they prove the general rule. One thing is certain, the best intentioned mod
erate drinker in the world may miscalculate and may get intoxicated. The
man who never drinks at all certainly never will. In the latter direction
there is absolute security. In the former danger constantly lurks.
"It is also insisted that the evils which we seek to correct would be
cured by the use of pure liquors, and that in a great measure the disas
trous consequences, flowing from the use of strong drink, are attributable
to the fact that the liquors now drunk are poisoned and adulterated. In
support of this position we are frequently cited to the asserted fact that our
fathers, or our grandfathers, as the case may be, freely indulged in the use
of alcoholic drinks, yet they rarely lost their self-control. I have taken
some pains to investigate this matter, and am constrained to doubt the exis
tence of the fact. At what particular period of time intoxicating liquors
failed to intoxicate, at what particular period of this world's history stim
ulating beverages failed to stimulate, we are not told. Bear in mind, that
the question now is, as to the direct and necessary effects of intoxicating
liquors. For the present we will dismiss all considerations as to their col
lateral effects. There has been no period in this world's history, and there never
will be, when the use of intoxicating liquors, in sufficient quantity, would
not produce intoxication. This result could not be possibly changed by the
purity of the liquors. The alcoholic element is the only one to which we
particularly object. It is this which crazes the brain and works the infinite
mischief which we seek to correct. Leave out every trace of alcohol from
brandy, whisky, gin, rum, wines, or beer, and no one will be intoxicated
by their use, even though they may contain strychnine, arsenic, log-wood,
and fusel oil, all combined.
" Moreover, with the alcohol omitted from these liquors, the other poisons
named will cease to be drunk as beverages, either separately, or in combi
nation. It is very possible, indeed it is quite probable, that our fathers were
not, in the use of intoxicating liquors, poisoned in such a complicated fashion
as are their descendants. They took, in using pure liquors, the hazard of
but one kind of poison, while the present drinker runs the risk of several
combined. The danger is now much greater than it then was, because if
the drinking man escapes death from alcohol, he is quite likely to be killed
by the strychnine or the fusel oil. The use of either will kill if long enough
persisted in, but the alcohol will intoxicate in any event.
34O LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
"Moreover, it is one of the peculiar qualities of all alcoholic stimulants
to produce in their use a morbid and unnatural appetite, of a character not
created by other beverages. It is the desire thus created which leads men
to brave all the terrors of the poisoned liquors now in use. It is idle to
argue that pure liquors do not have this tendency. It is the natural and
inevitable effect of the habitual use, even of the purest liquors ever drank,
to excite this morbid appetite for more. This appetite is created, not by the
elements with which the alcohol is combined, whether they be harmless, or
whether they be hurtful, but by the alcohol itself. Raw spirits in their
purest possible form will intoxicate, and will excite this appetite. Men do
not indulge in the use of pure alcohol, or high wines as a beverage. In
that shape they are unpalatable. That road to drunkenness is so rough and
disagreeable, that it is not often traveled. But however easy and agreeable
the road may be made, the end of the road is the same ; it is drunkenness,
and the drunken man is no less so because the liquor which imbruted him,
which robbed him of his senses, which blunted his moral consciousness, was
absolutely pure. It is possible that our forefathers, as a rule, drank less
than we do. They were men of iron will, resolute purpose, and a strong,
moral sense. They were not subjected to a tithe of the temptations which
continually be^set their descendants. The dangers of excessive drinking were
not as great then as now. But, nevertheless, when our fathers drank to
excess, they got drunk precisely as their sons do."
He then discussed the question of native wines and lager beer
as substitutes for the fiery extract distilled from corn. The
Chicago Tribune advocated the encouragement of beer saloons
and the restriction of whisky shops as a temperance measure.
But Mr. Storrs, as was usual with him in reasoning upon all
questions, legal, political, or social, saw no middle ground:
"Very much is said in recommendation of the use of native wines, and
we are urged to encourage their manufacture, so that prices may be cheap
ened and their use extended.
" Native wines will intoxicate as readily, and as surely, as the foreign
and imported article. The alcohol in the wines made from grapes grown
in the Missouri Valley, or California, or on the hillsides of Western New
York, will intoxicate as surely as though the grapes were grown in France,
Spain or Portugal. The effects of alcohol upon the human system are not
at all dependent upon the geography of the grape from which the alcohol
is produced. Alcohol is the same everywhere. It may be that under cer
tain climatic conditions its use may be more freely indulged in than under
others. It may be that wine drank in France will not intoxicate as readily
there as when drank here, but it is not recommended that we should go
there to do our drinking. The encouragement of the manufacture of native
wines, so that the prices should be lessened, leads to their more extended use,
and the more extended the use, the more certain is intoxication to result
from it. If the native wine, which now costs £3 per bottle, could be man-
PRACTICAL TEMPERANCE LEGISLATION. 34!
ufactured and sold for fifty cents per bottle, the result would not only be,
that more people would drink wine, so that the desire and taste for
alcoholic stimulant would be extended, but the people, who, before the
price was lessened, drank some, would be induced to drink more. I utterly
fail to see that the evils of intemperance are in the slightest degree miti
gated by the consideration that the liquor which produced them was made
at home.
"There are no elements of patriotism in the question. We would hardly
think of encouraging men to get drunk on home-made wines as a patriotic
duty ; nor for the protection or encouragement of what may be called
American industry. On the other hand, 1 think that so far as public bene
fits are concerned, the man whose revels are exclusively upon foreign liquors
has decidedly the advantage of the consumer of the home-made article.
The former, in purchasing his foreign wines, is compelled to pay the heavy
duties which the government imposes upon them, and thus, to a certain
extent, relieves temperate and sober people from the burdens of taxation.
So far as the mere matter of intoxication is concerned, the bibber of foreign
wines and the consumer of the domestic article stand on an even footing,
and in the particular which I have mentioned, the former has the advan
tage.
" I now approach a branch of the discussion which seems to be beset
with many difficulties, and the discussion of which excites much feeling. I
refer to the use of lager beer as .a beverage. Now, whether such use
should be prohibited by law, is one question, and whether it should be
encouraged is another, and quite a different one, It is the latter question
only which I now propose to touch. If it can be demonstrated that lager
beer is entirely harmless, that it is not an intoxicating beverage, we, as
temperance men, would have but very little interest in the question. It
might be in other respects injurious, as the excessive use of tea and coffee
is injurious, but if that were all, it would not fall within the purposes of
the temperance reform. That there is a certain quantity of alcohol in lager
beer will not probably be denied. That if drank in sufficient quantities it
will produce intoxication has been, I believe, denied. But to deny this
fact is to dispute the clear and unmistakable evidence of our senses. If
you have any doubt upon this point, go out into the streets to-morrow, visit
the places where lager is sold and drank, remain long enough to note its
effects. I will not ask you to try it yourselves, but observe how it oper
ates upon others, and I am quite sure that if net already satisfied that
lager beer will intoxicate, you will very soon become so. That more lager
beer is required to produce intoxication than whisky or brandy is very true,
but that is not the question. There is less alcohol in a gill of lager, than
in a gill of whisky, but men rarely drink a pint of whisky at a sitting, while
the consumption of a gallon of lager at a single sitting is perhaps unusual,
but is no very extraordinary feat for the expert, accustomed to its daily use,
to accomplish. While there is less alcohol in lager than there is in the
same quantity of whisky or brandy, there is a much larger quantity of it
drank than of either of these liquors, and so the result is quite likely to be
342 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
that the habitual consumer of lager beer takes during the day quite as
much alcohol in the stomach, as he who habitually drinks brandy or whisky.
"This being the case, the results are substantially the same. The use of
lager begets the same morbid appetite for more that is created by any other
form of alcoholic stimulant ; not only that, the time comes when the stom
ach craves, and the appetite demands a more active and a more powerful
stimulant, and the road thus opened leads directly to stronger liquors.
Without further pursuing this discussion, I conclude that we can make no
distinctions between any alcoholic and intoxicating beverages. That the use
of all of them should be discouraged.
" I do not propose to consume your time in recapitulating the horrors of
intemperance, nor enlarging upon the beauties and benefits of sobriety.
All these have been so well done, and so often done, that the world
already knows them by heart. No- subtle sophistries as to moderate drink
ing, or pure liquors, or native wines, or harmless ale and beer, will dis
guise from us for one single moment, the appalling horrors of strong drink.
Every drunkard's grave that has ever yet been filled was filled by one who
at the outset scouted all idea of danger, and prided himself upon the
assurance that however depraved and uncontrollable the appetite of others
might be, he was a moderate drinker, and he, at least, was safe. Beneath
the subtle spells and lurking deviltries of the praises of pure liquors, thous
ands of noble spirits, brilliant intellects, generous, high-hearted men have
fallen. The harmless ale and beer have seduced thousands, and hurried
them to their graves. In the warfare which we wage there can be no
compromise. A compromise to-day is total, absolute, unqualified sur
render to-morrow. There is no middle ground. There can be none. The
enemies with whom we are at war are our enemies still, no matter under
what banners they march. They are our enemies, and the enemies of
our race, whether clothed in the purple of foreign wines and liquors, the
homespun of native wines, the plain fabric of lager beer, or the rags of
poisoned whisky. We must meet them all. We must overcome them
all, and in God's good time, I believe we shall."
The means by which the temperance reform movement could
be carried forward to success were next considered in his own
practical way.
"And this leads directly to the consideration of by far the most difficult
question which we have to encounter. How shall the reform which we
seek be accomplished? Our failures, thus far, to secure that fu-11 measure of
success, long ago looked for, cannot be attributed to any weakness or errors
in the cause itself. Its merits are beyond all question. How, then, shall
we account for its lack of complete success? This is a very vital question.
It is the great question of the hour. What are the defects in our old
method; how can they be remedied, and what new ones can be devised?
"One explanation of the long postponement of final success I have already
attempted to give. It is to be found in the very nature of the reform which
we seek. Its character is neither political nor theological, in a strict sense.
PRACTICAL TEMPERANCE LEGISLATION. 343
It is moral. It involves the necessity of a change of habits, almost ineradi-
cably fixed by long indulgence. The greatest virtue which the temperance
reformer and agitator can possess is that of unwearied and unwearying
patience. No blasts from rams' horns will blow down the thick and solid
walls which generations of time have builded. They cannot be overthrown
by sudden assaults, nor brilliant dash ; but slowly and gradually they must
be undermined, until they will crumble to pieces of their own weight.
"Before the great body of the people can be thoroughly reformed, they
must be first educated up to the full measure of the reform. This educa
tion must be something more than a mere intellectual assent or conviction.
" It must, to be effective in the way of results, become a part of one's
nature, so to speak, and daily habit. But this reason alone is not suffi
cient to cover the entire ground of the partial failure of the temperance
movement. We all now quite clearly pfrceive^ that there now is, and that
there always has been, a lack of that thorough organization, and that
united and harmonious action, which is so essential to success in all refor
matory movements. Each temperance reformer has had his own special
and pet theory of action. He has nursed it carefully and tenderly, and is
as jealous of it as he would be of the honor and safety of his child. He
will neither modify nor change it, nor hold it in abeyance. He looks with
extreme jealousy upon every other method save his own ; and, hence,
instead of bending their united exertions against the common enemy, their
strength is frequently frittered away, and wasted by foolish quarrels and
differences among themselves.
"Of course I do not wish to be understood that these remarks are true
of all temperance reformers, but I appeal to your own experience whether
it is not true of by far too many of them. To-night and here we are met
to determine how 'the plague can be stayed.' Will it not be a splendid
beginning, if to-night we can all agree to surrender, for a time, our indi
vidual views, and sacrifice our prejudices upon the altar of the great cause
itself. We all are loud in invoking charity for the poor helpless inebriate.
This is well. But it is unnecessary to exhaust it all upon him, — let us leave
a little for each other.
"Let us now examine the various methods which have hitherto been
adopted, and testing them by their actual workings, see what we are pre
pared to say about them.
"I call attention, first to prohibition by legislation. I call attention to this
method of reform first, because, concerning its wisdom there are the widest
differences of opinion. How has it operated ? Do you all feel like answer
ing me that it has operated well? Have you not many doubts upon that
point? But suppose you tell me that the trouble is not with the law, but that
it has not been enforced. But I inquire why has it not been enforced?
There is no difficulty in enforcing any legislation, back of which stands an
endorsing and thoroughly approving public sentiment. You will agree with
me, that had prohibition been attempted fifty years ago, it would have failed
utterly and completely, even could the necessary legislation have been
secured. The officers of the law were quite as capable and efficient and
344 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
quite as honest then as they now are, but the trouble would then have
been that public sentiment would not have approved the law, nor sustained
the officers in its execution. It may be disagreeable to listen to such facts
as these, but they are facts nevertheless and if we are wise we will take
note of them. Now, has there been since that time such a growth and
advance in public sentiment as to change our policy? to make that wise
to-day, which fifty years ago was impolitic and unwise? Looking the ques
tion squarely in the face, what do you think about it? Bear in mind that
the inquiry is not how we would be glad to have the facts, but how are the
facts? The question is not one of feeling — but of dry, hard, unsympathetic
statistics. The experiment has been repeatedly tried. New England has
tried it for many years. I am not prepared to say whether the failure has
been complete or not, but it is certain that prohibition has not worked as
well as its friends anticipated. One*,thing is absolutely certain, that prohibitory
legislation alone is not adequate to the emergency. It is clear beyond all
question, that we need something more than prohibition. I exercise here
that charity for the opinions of others which I would claim for my own.
" I do not insist that prohibition is an absolutely demonstrated failure.
Where there is so much uncertainty as to the facts, it is next to impossible
to be certain and positive in our conclusions. Moreover, we are not seeking
to sustain a particular theory ; we look to the good of the cause itself; and
so long as its interests are advanced and promoted we need not be very
particular as to the means, so long as they are legitimate ones. But it
is well to examine all aspects of this question. A great historian has
said that there ' is nothing so hurtful as ignorant conscientiousness.
Remember that no legislation is of substantial service which is very far in
advance of public sentiment. It should not lag behind it; it should not
greatly anticipate it; it should be fully abreast of it. Excessive statutes
cumber the statute books, and are practically a dead letter. Of the
truth of this, history is full of examples. The tax of two dollars per gallon
on whisky, imposed by the general government, failed utterly as a Revenue
measure. Whisky was openly sold for less than the tax, but when it was
reduced to fifty cents per gallon the revenues were more than doubled.
Excessive tariffs prove failures. Honest importations are checked, revenues
are thus lost, and smuggling encouraged, for the excessive tariff is an
advertised premium upon smuggling. Excessive punishments invariably fail
to produce the results intended. So far from preventing the commission of
rcrime, they rather stimulate and encourage it. When in England the death
penalty was affixed to larceny, thieves went unwhipt of justice because juries
would not convict where the punishment was so excessively severe. Thus,
instead of preventing larcenies, they were largely increased. Such extreme
legislation is not only unwise because it cannot be executed as to the par
ticular offence against which it is directed, but it is unwise and incalculably
injurious in a broader sense, and for more exte'nded reasons.
"A statute unenforced, because public sentiment will not justify it, not
only brings the special statute into disrepute, but begets a disregard for all
law, and a contempt for any legal restraint whatsoever.
PRACTICAL TEMPERANCE LEGISLATION. 345
"I have purposely refrained from touching the question as to the wisdom
of what it called sumptuary legislation, of attempting to regulate by law
what a man shall eat, or drink, or wear. It is safe to say that as a gen
eral rule, such legislation has been deemed unwise. Whether legislation
of this character, with reference to intoxicating liquors, is an exception to
this general rule, I shall not take time to discuss. Enough has been said,
however, it seems to me, to justify us, so far as prohibitory legislation is
concerned, to proceed cautiously ; to weigh well every aspect of the ques
tion, and finally to decide it solely and with reference to its probable effects
upon the ultimate good of the cause itself.
"Observe that what I have said has* been with reference to prohibitory
legislation. Statutes regulating the sale and use of ardent spirits are of
quite a different character. They can be enforced. Public sentiment clearly
sustains them, and they ought to be enforced."
As during the civil war he had no sympathy with the fanatics
who pestered President Lincoln with their demands for an immedi
ate emancipation of the slaves, long before our armies had
gained such vantage ground as to make such a proclamation
other than a dead letter, so on the prohibition question he had
no patiertce with the extremists who insisted on making it a
separate issue in politics, as was done in the Presidential cam
paign of 1884, resulting in the defeat of the Republican candi
dates. On this point he uttered a warning note:
"And here let me say a word, with reference to mixing our temperance
with our politics. I doubt if you can find a solitary instance where such a
mixture has not injured the cause of temperance, without, in any way, as a
compensation, improving politics. I would not go about with our temper
ance doctrines in our hands, seeking to barter and trade them with some
political party. I would not say to any party organization : 'Give our tem
perance ideas a place in your platform, and we will give you our votes in
return.' Trades of this kind in certain localities can be made, and have
been made, but the never-failing result has been that the temperance men
have been fearfully cheated. I desire to see every step taken by the tem
perance reform in advance maintained ; I desire to see every reform achieved,
a substantial and permanent one — so to speak, structural in its character.
I would not see it swinging backwards and forwards, subject to the end
less freaks and caprices of partisan and political changes. I would not see
this great cause — spotless in its purity — with no smurch upon its garments
— dragged through the foul mires of partisan contention."
After referring to the secret societies organized in aid of the
temperance cause, Good Templars and others, who reached a
class who could not perhaps be secured in any other way, he
said:
"Great results were expected from the woman's movement, otherwise
346 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
known as the temperance crusade, which spread, of late, so rapidly all over
the country. No doubt much good was accomplished by it, but it remains
to be seen how permanent is the character of the work it has accomplished.
It was short lived — its force is now spent, and we have learned what we
already knew before, that the enemy was not to be vanquished by any
sudden sally. But we have nevertheless learned a most useful lesson by
this movement, brief and short lived as it was. We have been taught
what tremendous power women wield and can wield in this great cause.
Organized and persisted in, the influence of woman would, I am satisfied,
result in the largest measure of success. To achieve this success she
need not go into the streets, or she may, but exercising the social influ
ence which peculiarly belongs to her, the habit of indulging in strong
drink may be ultimately driven from every home. Finally, the churches
are all with us. It is fitting that they should be, and I know of no class of
teachers who have larger opportunities of advancing our cause than our
clergy.
"But it will be asked, and most naturally, what means would you adopt?
I would answer that I would, if necessary, join them all together and adopt
them all. I would unite wise legislation, the churches, the secret societies,
the open temperance organizations, moral suasion and social influence in one
compact body, all working to a single purpose. We need not be. afraid that
we shall adopt too many means. They will, all taken together, be found
none too strong. But I would follow, to a certain extent, the precedents set
by the politicians; I would organize a temperance movement in every ward
and divide each ward into districts. Committees should be appointed in
every district whose duty it should be to visit every household cursed with
intemperance. Personal appeals, persuasion and entreaty would do much.
I would continue this work patiently and unceasingly. It is wonderful to
see how strong a hold a kindly expression and manifestation of interest in
the well-being of your neighbor gives you upon him. In this work, the
assistance of temperance women will be invaluable, and we can hardly pre
dict how- much of splendid results such a line of labor would accomplish.
I believe that in every ward and district in this city organizations of women
can be formed, sufficiently strong and powerful to drive ardent spirits from
every household and from every table. When the use of liquors becomes
unfashionable, when those who indulge in its use learn that the penalty
which they are compelled to pay for such indulgence in social ostracism,
when it becomes as disreputable to be seen entering a drinking saloon as it
would to be seen entering a gambling hell, we may be assured that the
final triumph of the temperance cause is not very far off.
" Immense changes in this direction have already been wrought. As
gloomy as the prospect may appear to some, great and substantial progress
has, nevertheless, been made. Twenty-five years ago the decanter was
found upon every sideboard, and not to proffer the glass to your guest
would have been deemed the 'grossest incivility. To-day the sideboards thus
supplied and the glass thus proffered are the exceptions rather than the
rule. Twenty-five years ago our Senators reeled to their places in the
A
PRACTICAL TEMPERANCE LEGISLATION. 347
Senate, the public took but little heed to the disgraceful exhibition, or, if
they noted it at all, called it an eccentricity of genius. To-day such a
scene would shock the sense of the whole country, and so much more
healthy is public opinion, that habitual drunkenness in a public man is the
certain loss of public confidence and favor. Years ago a drunken clergyman
was not, by any means, a miracle. To-day how is it? Clergymen have
not so much changed as that public opinion now would not, for an instant,
tolerate in its religious teachers what but a few years ago it complacently
winked at. A quarter of a century ago, and how short, after all, the time
now seems, the use of intoxicating liquors by the members of the learned
professions, law and medicine, was almost universal. Slowly but surely,
nevertheless, has a more advanced public opinion applied the corrective, and
the professional man is taught in a manner which he cannot misunderstand,
that the public will have nothing to do with drunken lawyers or physicians.
These marked changes are apparent in every rank, in every station in life,
and in every department of business. The merchant is under a salutary
restraint, for well he knows that the moment it shall once become known
that he habitually indulges, and at times to an excess, in the use of ardent
spirits, his credit is irretrievably ruined. The church, dormant twenty-five
years ago, is now thoroughly aroused and lends her powerful assistance to
the temperance cause. Our legislators who, twenty-five years ago, treated
the temperance reformer as an impracticable fanatic, and who were exceed-
ingly anxious that it should be understood that they had no sympathy with
them, now humbly make obeisance in their presence, and are eager to do
their bidding.
"In short, the entire face of society, so far as the question of temperance
is concerned, has been changed within a quarter of a century. Public
opinion has been revolutionized; thousands and hundreds of thousands of
drunkards have been reformed, thoroughly and completely. Thousands of
homes, desolate and wretched twenty-five years ago, have been made bright
and happy. Temptations have been withdrawn from countless numbers of
young men, who would otherwise have gone astray ; the spread of intem
perance has been checked, and now strong as we are, having stopped its
onward course, we must drive it back to its own foul caverns.
" What imagination can conceive — what pen can portray — what pencil
can paint the glorious future which awaits us ! Marching under one single
banner, all difficulties healed, all dissensions hushed, there awaits us nothing
but glory. Our mission is to lift up the fallen, to comfort the sorrowing, to
soothe the poor bleeding heart.
"As we march on, the fires are lighted upon the old hearth-stones, whose
embers were long since burned out. The old roof-tree, long since leafless
and barren, awakens to new life and vigor, and fresh green leaves again fill
all its branches. The wail of the worse than widowed wife, the cry of the
worse than orphaned child, dies out from a thousand stricken homes, and
the glad song of renewed hope and joy ascend to Heaven in their stead.
Old ambitions rise out of their graves and bravely challenge the future.
Despair gives way to hope. Strife flies at the approach of the white-winged
348 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
messenger of peace. The beclouded intellect is cleared, the benumbed con
science is awakened, and, clothed and in his right mind, the poor slave to
strong drink, now free, sees hope and honor still before him. Self-respect
returns. Every noble feeling, long since slumbering, is awakened. No
smoking cities mark the pathway of this great army ; and when its journey
is complete, and its labors achieved, it looks back upon happy homes, upon
fields of waving grain, it hears the hum of busy cities, it watches the happy
and contented toil of the laborer. Be assured, our cause will triumph. And
as we stand, at last, on those glittering eminences which we are sure to reach,
there shall come swelling to our ears, from the valleys beneath, the praises
and plaudits of the hundreds of thousands whom our labors have saved,
saying: "God bless the great army of temperance — God save the temper
ance cause."
This address was printed and circulated in pamphlet form, and
attracted the attention of all thoughtful temperance reformers
throughout the United States. The paragraphs about prohibition
conveyed some ideas which the advocates of the plan of curing
intemperance by legislation had not thought of before, and in
Iowa, which has a purely agricultural population, and has few
populous towns beyond the bank of the Mississippi river, — in
which, therefore, the experiment of prohibitory legislation seemed
to have a better chance of success than even in Maine, — Mr.
Storrs' published opinion created quite a sensation. A prominent
citizen of Iowa wrote to him for a completer exposition of his
views on this subject. The correspondence was as follows:
'•DAVENPORT, March 3, 1875.
" HON. EMERY A. STORRS.
"DEAR SIR: — I have carefully read your very able address delivered
at the Second Baptist Church, in Chicago, on the evening of Oct. I5th,
1874, and knowing you to be an earnest worker in the temperance reform,
I was struck with your remarks upon the subject of prohibitory laws as a
method of reform, and especially that part of it which asserts that ' a stat
ute unenforced, because public sentiment will not justify it, not only brings
the special statute into disrepute, but begets a disregard for all law, and a
contempt for any legal restraint whatsoever.'
"I have also very carefully considered the expressions of opinion by
earnest temperance reformers in those Eastern States where prohibitory laws
have existed for years, which so nearly accord with your views, that I have
made the subject one of thoughtful study and inquiry for some time, and
although I have been for twelve years a diligent and persistent advocate of
prohibitory legislation, and have seen its workings here during that period,
I am becoming doubtful in regard to the expediency of such laws as auxil
iaries in the temperance reform. It has seemed to me that the existence
of such laws on the statute books has tended to relax the labors of the
PRACTICAL TEMPERANCE LEGISLATION. 349
advocates of total abstinence, and induced them to rely upon law to create
and sustain that public sentiment which can only be kept alive and vigor
ous by the unremitting labors of the advocates of reform. I was also seri
ously impressed with that part of the message of the Governor of Illinois,
at the present session of your Legislature, upon the same subject. They
struck me as words of 'truth and soberness.' In this State the laws, so far
as they effect the sale of intoxicating liquors, are, by some of the truest
temperance reformers, esteemed practically a failure, for, with such laws,
in almost all the larger cities, the sale is only limited by the demand, and
the laws silently and tacitly ignored.
"Now, it becomes a serious inquiry whether or not ( to use your own
words) this 'does not beget a disregard for all law, and a contempt for any
legal restraint whatsoever.' I would like to obtain your views, more clearly
stated, upon this subject, for I am almost persuaded, by experience demon
strated, that in a republic where the will of the people is law, all prohibi
tory legislation of the sale of an article so generally used, in advance of a
safe and abiding major public sentiment sustaining it, is unwise, and tends
to relax individual effort in favor of actual reform
"Yours truly,
"GEO. E. Hl'BBELL."
"GEO. E. HUBBELL.
" MY DEAR SIR: — Yours of the 3d inst., came to hand this morning.
" I have not given to the subject of ' Prohibition Legislation,' the examina
tion nor the thought which its importance demands ; but nevertheless have
quite decided opinions with regard to it.
"There are several methods of judging of the wisdom of any proposed
scheme of legislation :
"I. How has such legislation worked practically?
"2. Is it wise on general principles?
"The advocates of prohibition have, I am aware, furnished statistics as
to the practical workings of the law in certain portions of Maine and Mass
achusetts, where it has been in force, and claim that from those statistics
it clearly appears that such legislation can be enforced, and that when
enforced, its results are of a most satisfactory character.
" But, notwithstanding these statistics, I am constrained to think that the
great mass of testimony leads to the conclusion that throughout Maine and
Massachusetts generally, the law has not been enforced, and in the former
State most certainly it has had a fair trial.
"Now, if it has not generally been enforced in those States, we must
look for some different explanation than that the officials whose duty it
was to execute the law were corrupt or wilfully failed to perform their
duties. Maine and Massachusetts are both par excellence law-abiding
States, and the people are an order-loving, law-abiding people.
"There is no difficulty in enforcing the laws there generally, and there
must be something about this particular kind of legislation itself which cre
ates the difficulty.
"The advocates of prohibition tell us when we point to the State where
35O LIFE OF EMERY A. STORRS.
it is in force, and show that drunkenness still prevails there, and that there
is no marked and apparent benefit .resulting from it; that the trouble is that
the law is not carried out, and that if it were only executed we would soon
see that drunkenness would, in a great measure, cease. This is doubtless
true. If the sale or manufacture of intoxicating liquors were for any cause
to absolutely cease, there would be but little if any intoxication. But the
trouble is that such extreme statutes are not enforced, and we are justified
in saying from that very fact, that they cannot be enforced ; so the very
explanation which its friends give us for the failure of the law, is, in my
judgment, the strongest argument against the law itself.
"Public opinion does not sustain this extreme legislation. Men refuse to
be forced in this fashion, and the opinion of the best thinkers, is almost, if
not quite, unanimously opposed to any legislation which seeks to coerce the
appetites or the tastes of men.
"Now, an unenforced and generally disregarded and violated statute is,
as we all know, especially injurious in its consequences. The continuing
spectacle of a violated law — violated openly and recklessly, is productive of
the worst results, and has a direct tendency to bring all law into contempt.
The public will not be confronted daily by a statute which is by a large
portion of the community hated, by another portion utterly spurned, and by
another regarded as unjust and oppressive in its operations, without gradually
extending their suspicions and doubts to the entire system of laws under
which they live.
"It is idle to talk of enforcing a prohibitory law in Chicago. You cannot
by a statute possibly convince a German that it is wrong either to sell or
drink lager beer. The moment you attempt it he considers himself out
raged and oppressed, and rebels against it. Moderate men by hundreds
and thousands, are driven from the ranks of Temperance Reform, where
they really belong, by these extreme measures, into the ranks of the oppo
sition, where they do not belong, and they are led to suspect the efficiency
of all our efforts in that direction.
"Any man, with half an eye, can see that such has been the effect in
this city. I know not how it may be in Davenport, but human nature is, I
imagine, very much the same there that it is here, and the same cause would
be very likely to produce the same results in both places.
" You, of course, will not understand me as recommending or approving
the moderate use of even lager beer. I think the idea of moderate drinking
of any intoxicating alcoholic beverage is a delusion and a snare, and I
would employ every method of argument, persuasion and entreaty, to lead
others to the same conclusion. But legislation is another matter. We can
not legislate for men as we would like to have them, but as they are, and
when that time comes that everybody is willing that his appetites shall be
regulated by law, it will be when every ones appetites are such as the law
requires them to be.
"Of course we all recognize the necessity of regulating the sale of intoxi
cating liquors by law. This necessity I fully appreciate, and think the
statute we now have in this State is in the main a good one. But after all,
PRACTICAL TEMPERANCE LEGISLATION. 351
the great reforms which we seek to accomplish must in the main be wrought
out through other agencies than that of legislation.
"Yours trulv,
"CHICAGO, March 4, 1875. "£MERY A. STORKS."
In November of the same year he delivered an address at
Aurora, 111., in aid of the Aurora Temperance Reform Club. No
report of it has been preserved. The Aurora Daily News of
November II, 1875, thus describes the occasion:
" Hon. Emery A. Storrs addressed one of the largest audiences ever
assembled in Aurora, at Coulter's Opera House last night. It is always a
pleasure to listen to Emery A. Storrs on any subject, but especially so, on
the subject of temperance. His reference to the influence of one reformed
man, will find an illustration in his own life and experience. He appears
to have more confidence in public sentiment, and the will and pluck of the
inebriate to work a reform, than in legislative enactments. Being one of
the leading lawyers of the Northwest, his opinion in this respect ought to
have particular force. He believes however in using all legitimate means
of warfare. It was without doubt the finest, most sensible and best appre
ciated temperance lecture ever delivered in this city."
The path of wisdom which he had resolved to tread, he
desired that others should follow. With the utmost delicacy and
tact, he pleaded with every one in whom he felt an interest, and
there was no surer mark of Mr. Storrs' friendship and regard
than his gradually bringing a conversation round to this topic,
and urging the cause he had so much at heart. Soon after the
address given at the Second Baptist Church was printed, he sent
some copies to a friend, with a characteristic letter: — "If you get
drunk after reading this, it is your own fault. I relieve myself
from all further responsibility in the matter. Soberly hopeful
that you may join the band of reformed drunkards, that you too
may be 4a brand plucked from the burning,' I am affectionately
yours."
In all things his views were eminently practical, and he has
the credit of having been one of the first to give practical shape,
to temperance work in enforcing legislation already on the statute
book, and in devising further legislation in the same direction.
In February 1875 he addressed a letter to Mr. Andrew Paxton
suggesting that some corporate action should be taken by the
temperance societies of Chicago with the view of persuading the
heads of large manufacturing establishments, and employers of
labor generally, to make Monday pay-day instead of Saturday — a
352 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
suggestion which has since taken general effect, and ripened into
a custom. Mrs. T. B. Carse had been personally canvassing the
business houses with this end in view, but Mr. Storrs thought
there should be an organized influence brought to bear. Though
convinced that prohibition was impracticable in the present con
dition of American society, and especially in the large cities, he
yet saw a wide field open for useful legislation in the way of
regulating and restricting the liquor traffic. He saw that young
men who formed drinking habits before they had arrived at a
knowledge of the deep responsibilities of life were the most likely
of all to pursue the drunkard's career, and that, though general
prohibition could not be made operative, all classes would hail
such legislation as would remove temptation from the young.
At the time of the railroad riots in 1877, it had been observed
that most of those engaged in the disturbance in Chicago were
minors, inflamed by the use of intoxicating liquors. On investi
gation it was ascertained not only that tens of thousands of boys
under age were daily patrons of the saloons, but that most, if
not all of the dram-shops were in the habit of selling them liquor.
There were then in round numbers about 3,000 saloons in the
.city of Chicago, and the number of minors to whom they freely
sold beer and liquor was estimated at 30,000. Among the minors
who were then patronizing the saloons were hundreds of young
girls. The city police were notoriously inefficient to check the
evil, even if they did not connive at it. This horrible state of
things was vividly portrayed and vehemently denounced by Mr.
Storrs in a stirring address which he delivered in Farwell Hall
in February 1878. The facts set forth in that address were
gathered from personal investigation by Messrs. F. F. Elmendorf
and Andrew Paxton, who visited a large number of saloons in
the Winter of 1877 and were eye-witnesses of the scenes of
juvenile depravity permitted in them. A meeting of temperance
men and women was held in November 1877, at which the for
mation of a Citizens' League was suggested for the purpose of
suppressing this branch of the liquor traffic, and saving the
youth of the city from habits of dissipation and vice. Mr. Storrs
drafted the constitution of the "Chicago Citizens' League for
the suppression of the sale of liquor to minors," — the first organ
ization of its kind in the United States, — and it was incorporated
PRACTICAL TEMPERANCE LEGISLATION 353
under the laws of Illinois in April 1878, Mr. Storrs and three
other gentlemen, Messrs. F. F. Elmendorf, I. P. Rumsey, and
Andrew Paxton, being the incorporators to whom the certificate
was issued. Mr. Elmendorf was chosen as the first president of
the League, and Mr. Paxton was appointed prosecuting agent.
Mr. Storrs was appointed special counsel. Mr. Paxton was pro
vided with assistants, so that each division of the city should be
thoroughly looked after, and every saloon-keeper found selling
liquor to minors prosecuted and punished. The result of their
work was that in a few years the sale of liquor to minors was
diminished by seventy-five per cent, and may now be said to be
entirely suppressed, most saloons having posted conspicuously
over their bars a notice that minors are not allowed on the
premises. As Mr. Elmendorf said, this action of the League has
been the turning point in the lives of thousands of young men
in Chicago. The liquor dealers formed an association to combat
the efforts of the League, one of its purposes being to defend its
members against prosecutions, but even they were compelled to
recognize the principle for which the League contended, by pass
ing a resolution that no saloon-keeper who sold liquor to minors
should be a member of their organization. In January 1883 the
Chicago Citizens' League were able to report that during the
preceding five years 300 saloons had been closed, 25,000 youths
had been kept out of saloons, 1600 saloon-keepers had been
arrested, 3000 homes had been visited, the League had saved in
police and criminal law expenses $500,000 to the city, and had
diverted from the tills of the saloon-keepers to the proper support
of families £2,000,000. The agents of the League at first
encountered obstacles in their work from the lukewarmness of
the magistrates, but by steady perseverance they brought even
the justices round to their side ; judgments were given, fines
inflicted, licences revoked, and thus the laws were enforced.
Each successive step strengthened the movement, and made the
next advance more easy.
The success of the Chicago Citizen's League led to the forma
tion of similar leagues all over the country. Other Illinois cities
and towns followed its example, with equally gratifying results.
From Pennsylvania and Massachusetts, and from other States,
Mr. Storrs was applied to for information as to the constitution
23
354 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
and working of the Chicago League; and even from the Sand
wich islands a message came asking for the same information,
with a view to similar work there. Finally, in December 1882,
the Citizen's Law and Order League of Massachusetts, one of
the numerous progeny of the organization which first took work
ing shape in Mr. Storrs' practical mind, issued a call for a
national convention to be held at Boston, for the purpose of
forming a National League. The convention met at Boston in
February 1883, and Mr. Elmendorf was elected president of the
National League then formed, Mr. Storrs being chosen as chair
man of the standing committee on enforcement of the laws.
The local movement to which Mr. Storrs was mainly instru
mental in giving practical shape, is now a national organization
having branches all over the country; and it is safe to say that
wherever its influence has penetrated, wherever a branch league
has been formed, the sale of liquors to minors is comparatively
unknown, and even the saloon-keepers themselves acknowledge
that the change is altogether for the better.
While Mr. Storrs was in St. Louis, as leading counsel for the
defence on the trial of the celebrated Babcock case, he had occa
sion to exhibit his power of extempore oratory in a remarkable
manner. The case was won ; his client was honorably acquitted ;
and there gathered around Mr. Storrs in the Lindell hotel a host
of congratulating friends, citizens of St. Louis, including many
eminent members of the St. Louis bar. Some of these were dis
posed to celebrate the occasion by conviviality, but Mr. Storrs
couid not be induced to join in their potations, though he lent
them his countenance, and sat smiling by, drinking lemonade.
One of his legal brethren suggested that he surely never had
gone through the fatigues of such a trial without some stronger
stimulus than lemonade ; he doubted its power of inspiration, and
challenged Mr. Storrs to make an off-hand temperance speech.
Mr. Storrs promptly responded to the challenge, and a short-hand
reporter who was present took notes of what he said, and pub
lished the speech from his notes after Mr. Storrs' death. It is
unquestionably a wonderful effort, and shows not only what an
amazing command of language Mr. Storrs had, but also his readi
ness in marshaling his thoughts on the shortest notice, so that
everything he said was clear and to the point. Although model-
PRACTICAL TEMPERANCE LEGISLATION. 355
cd on Mr. Cough's well-know apostrophe to water, — which, by
the way, was not original with him, but is traced back to Loren
zo Dow, — the speech which follows is so thoroughly characteristic
in ideas and method of expression as to be altogether Mr. Storrs'
own :
"How do you expect to improve upon the beverage furnished by nature?
Here it is — Adam's ale — about the only gift that has descended undefiled
from the Gasden of Eden ! Nature's common carrier — not created in the
rottenness of fermentation, nor distilled over guilty fires! Not born among
the hot and noxious vapors and gases of worms and retorts, confined in
reeking vats, placed in clammy barrels and kegs, stored in malarious cellars
full of rats and cobwebs ! No adulteration fills it with sulphuric acid, spirits
of nitre, stramonium, other deadly drugs and poisons, until it is called ' forty-
rod death,' and 'bug-juice,' 'fusel oil,' and 'Jersey lightning!' It is not kept
standing in the fumes of sour beer and tobacco-smoke in saloons exposed
for weeks and months before it is drank to the odor of old cigar-stubs and
huge spittoons. Virtues and not vices are its companions. Does it cause
drunkenness, disease, death, cruelty to women and children? Will it place
rags on the person, mortgages on the stock, farm, and furniture? Will it
consume wages and income in advance and ruin men in business? No!
But it floats in white gossamer clouds far up in the quiet summer sky,
and hovers in dreamy mist over the merry faces of all our sparkling
lakes. It veils the woods and hills of earth's landscapes in a purple haze,
where filmy lights and shadows drift hour after hour. It piles itself in tum
bled masses of cloud-domes and thunderheads, draws the electric flash from
its mysterious hiding-places, and seams and shocks the wide air with vivid
lines of fire. It is carried by kind winds and falls in rustling curtains of
liquid drapery over all the thirsty woods and fields, and fixes in God's
mystic eastern heavens His beautiful bow of promise, glorified with a
radiance that seems reflected out of Heaven itself. It gleams in the frost
crystals of the mountain tops and the dews of the valleys. It silently
creeps up to each leaf in the myriad forests of the world and tints each
fruit and flower. It is here in the grass-blades of the meadows, and there
where the corn waves its tassels and the wheat is billowing! It gems
the depths of the desert with the glad, green oasis, winds itself in oceans
round the whole earth, and roars its hoarse, eternal anthems on a hun
dred thousand miles of coast! It claps its hands in the flashing wave-
crests of the sea, laughs in the little rapids of the brooks, kisses the
dripping, moss-covered, old oaken well-buckets in a countless host of
happy homes! See these pieces of cracked ice, full of prismatic colors,
clear as diamonds! Listen to their fairy tinkle against the brimming glass,
that sweetest music in all the world to one half-fainting with thirst ! And
so, in the language of that grand old man, Gough, I ask you, Brothers all,
would you exchange that sparkling glass of water for alcohol, the drink
of the very Devil himself?"
CHAPTER XXL
THE ST. LOUIS WHISKY RING.
HISTORY OF THE ST. LOUIS WHISKY RING — ITS METHOD OF OPERATIONS — THE
PROSECUTIONS CONDUCTED FOR POLITICAL ENDS — IMMUNITY GIVEN TO THE
WORST OFFENDER — AN ATTEMPT TO CAST DISCREDIT UPON PRESIDENT GRANT
BY INDICTING HIS PRIVATE SECRETARY — THE PROSECUTIONS RUN IN THE
INTEREST OF SECRETARY BRISTOW'S PRESIDENTIAL ASPIRATIONS— GENERAL
BABCOCK'S CAREER — THE MEPHISTOPHELIAN ARTS OF JOYCE AND MACDON-
ALD IN CORRESPONDING WITH HIM — POPULAR PREJUDICE AGAINST BABCOCK
— ATTITUDE OF PRESIDENT GRANT — HIS LETTER TO MRS. BABCOCK.
THE latter years of President Grant's second administration
were clouded by the exposure and prosecution of a wide
spread organization to defraud the Government out of a large
portion of its legitimate revenue, which has passed into history
under the name of the " whisky ring." Before General Grant
had been in office for many months of his second term, " it
became evident," to use the words of the President himself,
"that the Treasury was being defrauded of a portion of the
revenue that it should receive from the distillation of spirits in
the West." Efforts were made by the Commissioner of Internal
Revenue, by sending out special revenue agents, to obtain
evidence of the fraud, and to punish those concerned in it ; but
some of those agents were not themselves proof against tempta
tion, and they were bought off by the distillers. It was not till
1875 that conclusive evidence was in the hands of the Internal
Revenue Department, showing the existence of a combination
among the distillers and revenue officers all over the West, — in
St. Louis, Peoria, Pekin, Chicago, Milwaukee, and in Indianapolis,
Louisville, New Orleans, and other places, — to defraud the
356
THE ST. LOUIS WHISKY RING. 357
Government by the manufacture on an extensive scale of whisky
on which no tax was pard.
The storm broke first in the city of St. Louis, where the
" ring " had been in operation for four years. In that time it
was estimated that they had cheated the Government out of over
a million dollars. All the officers entrusted with the collection
of the public revenue, from the District Collector down to the
humblest gauger, were concerned in it, for without their conni
vance the distillers and rectifiers could not have carried on their
fraudulent operations for a single day. It was one of the most
powerful combinations, both as to the wealth of one branch of
its membership and as to the official power and advantages of
the other, of which the history of this country furnishes an
example.
The high duty on distilled spirits, which was imposed as a
necessary means of raising revenue to carry on the war, and
which was then 70 cents per gallon, offered a tempting induce
ment to dishonest revenue officers and distillers to confederate
together to defraud the Government. A "ring" for this purpose
was formed in St. Louis early in 1871, by one Conduce G.
Megrue, who had been Assessor of Internal Revenue in the
Cincinnati district, and was transferred to the St. Louis district
in that year, through the solicitation of his friend John A. Joyce,
who had been a clerk in the Treasury Department at Washington,
but was now employed as Revenue Agent at St. Louis. Megrue
had won over to the prosecution of his schemes all the highest
officers of the revenue in that city, — Charles W. Ford, the Col
lector, John Macdonald, the Supervisor, Joyce, the Revenue
Agent, and the proprietor and editor of the Globe-Democrat,
William M'Kee. He made propositions to the distillers to
begin the manufacture of illicit whisky, assuring them that the-
local officers of the Government would afford them protection,
and the business was commenced at once, the distillers paying
over every Saturday night to Megrue one half the tax, or 35
cents on every gallon of whisky on which the duty had been
evaded. This fund was divided among the five members of the
ring already named. The other half was the profit of the distil
lers, who sold their illicit whisky to the rectifiers at 15 cents a
gallon less than the regular market price, retaining 20 cents a
LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
gallon to themselves. Part of the money paid to the "ring"
collector, Megrue, went to bribe the gaugers and store-keepers
employed by the Government at the distilleries. In the short
period of fourteen months after its organization, the St. Louis
ring, it was calculated, had cheated the Government out of
more than $600,000. The shares of each of the five members
of the ring in that time were over $60,000 each.
Megrue left St. Louis in 1872, and for some months the illicit
manufacture was suspended. The ring had to be formed anew.
In the spring of 1873 Joyce took command of its operations,
and appointed as "ring'' collector a revenue officer of the name
of Fitzroy. Every Saturday night, Fitzroy paid over to Joyce
the money he had got from the distillers, amounting sometimes
to $1000, and some weeks as high as $3000, as the unlawful
gains of the week. In August 1874, Fitzroy was succeeded in
the performance of this delicate duty by Abijah M. Everest, a
gauger, who became one of the most sensational witnesses for
the Government in the trials which subsequently occurred. When
the scent became too warm, and Abijah stood in danger of
indictment himself, he set an example which so many bank
cashiers have followed since, and fled his country. He was
allured back from Rome on promises of immunity, to testify in
the only case where his testimony was of least service in bring
ing out the truth, but where these trials had assumed a political
complexion, and were being used to make political capital for
an aspirant to the Presidential chair then occupied by General
Grant. Everest continued to be the collector for the ring until
the distilleries at St. Louis were seized, and all the participants
in this gigantic scheme of fraud were arrested and put upon trial.
This catastrophe happened in May, 1875. Secret agents had
.been sent out from Washington, and on their reports orders
were given to seize all the distilleries where illicit whisky-making
was found to have been carried on, their proprietors placed
under arrest, and informations filed against not only the distillers
but against all the revenue officers who were found to have been
concerned in the fraud. Joyce, Macdonald, and M'Kee were
indicted, tried, and convicted of complicity in the business, and
sentenced to severe terms of imprisonment in Jefferson penitentiary.
The prosecutions of the whisky ring conspirators lasted all
THE ST. LOUIS WHISKY RING. 359
through the Fall of 1875. A Vl^ witness for the Government
was the rascal Megrue, who was the originator of this whole
gigantic scheme of fraud, so far as the St. Louis district was
concerned, and whose testimony was purchased by Secretary
Bristow and his subordinate officers by a promise of absolute
immunity. Megrue took good care to have clear documentary
proof of this bargain before he went on the stand to testify.
It was of course indispensibly necessary, in order to carry on
the fraudulent operations of the ring without molestation, that
there should be some official confederate in Washington who
could give prompt and timely information of any indication of
suspicion on the part of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue,
or any action on his part with the view of unearthing the frauds.
Such a confederate was easily found by Joyce, from his previous
knowledge of the Department, in the person of William O. Avery,
who was chief clerk in the office of the Commissioner, and there
fore knew of all orders for the sending out of secret revenue
agents into suspected districts. The evidence of his complicity
becoming apparent on the trial of the St. Louis conspirators, he
was likewise indicted, tried, and convicted.
In the course of Avery's trial, some telegrams which had been
sent to Joyce and Macdonald by General Babcock, the private
secretary of President Grant, were put in evidence by the prose
cution ; and then was developed the purpose of the prosecuting
attorneys, acting in furtherance of Secretary Bristow's pretensions
to the Presidential nomination in 1876, to seek to connect Presi
dent Grant, through his confidential secretary, with the revenue
frauds in St. Louis. Not only was absolute immunity promised
and given to the worst and most guilty of the conspirators, but
the telegraph offices all over the country were ransacked, and,
as Mr. Storrs said, "the cradle and the grave were robbed*" to
obtain the slightest scrap of evidence which could in any way be
*This phrase was not Mr. Storrs' own. It is one of those aphoristic say
ings of General Grant which have become historical. In a letter to Hon.
E. B. Washburne, August 16, 1864, General Grant discusses the result of
"peace on any terms" for which some politicians at the North were clam
oring, and in that letter he says: — "The rebels have now in their ranks
their last man. The little boys and old men are guarding prisons, guarding
railroad bridges, and forming a good part of their garrisons for entrenched
positions. A man lost by them cannot be replaced. They have robbed
alike the cradle and the grave to get their present force."
360 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
construed to implicate General Babcock in these transactions. It
was notorious then, and has since become the settled verdict of
the entire nation, that the private secretary of the President was
made the scape-goat of a scheme which had for its ultimate end
the tarnishing of General Grant's good name, to enable a man
who had never been heard of outside of his own State until
Grant made him a member of his Cabinet, to creep by unworthy
methods into the Presidential chair. It is now matter of history
that Mr. Bristow's ambitious schemes were defeated in the Cin
cinnati Convention of 1876, which nominated Mr. Hayes of Ohio
as President Grant's successor.
The officer against whom this unscrupulous persecution was
directed had up to this time borne an unblemished reputation,
and had already, though quite a young man, won for himself an
honorable military and civil record in the service of his country.
A native of Vermont, he entered West Point at the age of six
teen, graduating in 1861, when he went upon active duty as
second lieutenant in the corps of engineers, After spending
some time in Washington drilling the raw New England troops,
he was assigned to duty in connection with the fortifications about
Washington, and afterwards served on General Banks' staff in the
Shenandoah valley. He first came into prominent notice when,
as chief engineer of the Ninth army corps, he followed his com
mand to Vicksburg. At the siege of that city, he was given
charge of the outer line of the attacking works, opposite General
Joe Johnston. General Grant visited these works a few days
after their completion, and, being struck with the skill shown in
their construction, asked for the officer who had raised them.
This led to the first meeting between Grant and Babcock. Soon
afterwards, when Vicksburg fell General Grant paid Colonel Bab
cock the special compliment of requesting his personal attendance
at the ceremony of the surrender. When Grant received his
commission as Lieutenant-General, he appointed Babcock to a
position on his staff. From this time onwards the utmost confi
dence was reposed in General Babcock by his chief; and when
Lee finally surrendered, it was to General Babcock that was
deputed the honorable task of meeting the fallen Confederate
chieftain to arrange all the necessary preliminaries for that cere
mony which crowned the victory of the Union armies. A
THE ST. LOUIS WHISKY RING. 361
friendship, thus commenced on the field, was continued after the
war into civil life. The President chose his trusted companion
in arms for his private secretary, and General Babcock filled that
position at the time of these prosecutions.
The first intimation of a design to connect General Babcock
with the whisky frauds came on the trial of Macdonald in
November, 1875, when some of the distillers already convicted
testified that Joyce had told them that Babcock was in the ring.
No witness, however, ventured to testify to this as a fact
within his own knowledge. Judge Krum, of St. Louis, who was
defending Macdonald, immediately telegraphed to General Babcock
informing him of this fact. The consternation and horror that
would naturally possess a high-minded man of sensitive honor on
hearing of such an accusation can well be imagined. General
Babcock at once went with Krum's despatch to Mr. Bluford
Wilson, the solicitor of the Treasury, and asked him what course
he thought he ought to pursue for his own vindication. General
Babcock wished to go to St. Louis and disclaim on oath all
knowledge of or connection with the ring, but Mr. Wilson
thought it unnecessary for him to do so, and Judge Krum wrote
that upon reflection he thought it would be unwise for General
Babcock to take any notice of a charge made in such a way.
The contents of the despatch were stated to Attorney General
Pierrepont, who was still more emphatic in the expression of
his opinion, stating that for General Babcock to go to St. Louis
to vindicate himself against statements from such a source
would be both "improper and unwise."
So the matter rested until the trial of Avery in the following
week, when some telegrams from Babcock to Joyce and Macdonald
were for the first time offered in evidence, and nearly at the close
of that trial. " Precisely how they got in evidence," said Mr.
Storrs afterwards, "no lawyer has ever yet been able to under
stand." In the course of argument as to their admissibility,
General John B. Henderson, who had been engaged as special
counsel to help District Attorney Dyer in the prosecutions, made
a speech in which he accused the President of improperly using
his authority to influence the action of the Commissioner of
Internal Revenue, and while ironically and gratuitously exonerat
ing the President from actual complicity in the ring, claimed that
362 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
the President had been grossly deceived and imposed upon by
persons pretending to be his friends, both in Washington and St.
Louis, — among which pretended friends he named General Bab-
cock. He expressed his opinion that "General Babcock had
performed his part" in connection with the ring, and alluded
mysteriously to some secret knowledge possessed by the prosecut
ing attorneys.
Instantly upon the report of Henderson's speech coming into
his hands, General Babcock sent the following telegram to Dis
trict Attorney Dyer:
"I am absolutely innocent, and every telegram which I sent
will appear perfectly innocent the moment I can be heard. I
demand a hearing before the Court. When can I testify?"
To this the following reply was received by him on the same
day :
" The evidence in the Avery case is closed. The next case
involving questions of conspiracy is set for the fifteenth of Dec-
cember. David P. Dyer, District Attorney."
General Babcock thereupon addressed a letter to the President,
setting forth these facts, and concluding thus:
"The opportunity to answer the charges contained in the
above speech having been thus denied me, and being left with
out any opportunity to vindicate myself, I respectfully demand a
court of inquiry, and request that an immediate investigation be
ordered."
The President made the following endorsement upon this letter
the following day, December 3, 1875:
"The Secretary of War may convene the court of inquiry
asked for. (Signed.) U. S. Grant."
A court of inquiry was accordingly ordered to assemble at
Chicago on the pth December, consisting of Lieutenant-General
Sheridan, Major-General W. S. Hancock, and Brigadier-General
Terry, with Major A. B. Gardner as Judge Advocate. On the
1 5th, the court of inquiry was dissolved by order of the Presi
dent, General Babcock having in the meantime been indicted at
St. Louis.
It is perhaps only fair to the officials of the Government to
say that they were not the first to try to involve the White
House in the disgrace which had befallen the ring conspirators.
THE ST. LOUIS WHISKY KING. 363
From the first, Joyce and McDonald had sought to impress the
distillers with the idea that they had friends in influential station
in Washington, and that the money which they were stealing was
being used for political campaign purpose in the interest of
General Grant's administration. They adroitly, as we shall soon
find, concocted a correspondence with both the President and
General Babcock, the answers to which must inevitably be so
worded as to confifm the idea that their practices were known and
tacitly permitted by the Executive. One of the convicted distillers
was said to have declared that they were perfectly safe, inasmuch
as they could " fix things to bring Babcock and other high officers
into the scrape, and the President, who would be a candidate
again, could not afford that." The statements of Joyce and Mac-
donald, industriously circulated, that the stealings of the ring were
devoted to a corrupt campaign fund, were eagerly believed by
the opponents of the administration, who in the State of Missouri
were of course very numerous, and whose ranks had lately been
increased by the defection of Carl Schurz, then U. S. Senator from
Missouri, and other equally prominent politicians, from the Repub
lican party. They were taken up by the organs of Bristow and
of the Democratic party in the public press, and Grant and Bab
cock wrere already condemned and sentenced by able editorial jur
ists before a word of testimony had been taken. As in this country
everybody forms his opinion, to some extent at least, from the
newspapers, the minds of the people in Missouri were made up,
and there was but one opinion pervading the community as to
General Babcock's guilt.
The height to which popular prejudice ran was strikingly
exemplified in the case of Mr. McKee of the Globe-Democrat.
His case differed from all the others in this respect, that the only
testimony against him was that of Megrue and some of the con
spirators who were already convicted ; and the eminent judge
before whom these trials were all conducted, Judge Dillon, in a
careful charge, warned the jury that the evidence of these persons
although admissable to prove any acts of the defendant in further
ance of the conspiracy, ought to be received with extreme caution,
and carefully scrutinized and considered in the light of the sur
rounding circumstances. The charge was generally regarded
as strongly in favor of the defendant, and people of both po-
364 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
itical parties were astonished at the conviction of McKee on
such slender and suspicious evidence after so favorable
a charge. The leading counsel for Mr. McKee's defence was
Dan Voorhees of Indiana, now U. S. Senator from that
State. It is said that after the verdict was rendered, a St. Louis
lawyer, not distinguished for the elegance of his attire, met Voor
hees and remarked that he could point out where the weak point in
the case against McKee was. Voorhees shook hfs head mournfully,
and replied, — "If you had gone before that jury with a boiled
shirt on, you couldn't have cleared your Saviour." It was with
such a bitterly prejudiced public sentiment that Mr. Storrs had to
contend from first to last in the defence of General Babcock.
The correspondents of the press at Washington, St. Louis, and
elsewhere, kept up an incessant stream of highly spiced gossip,
all tending to smirch Babcock, and keep alive the popular impres
sion which they had created that Babcock was guilty. The
newspaper and popular verdict was thus made up before the case
was tried. One writer said, — "The ring went to Avery for infor
mation, but relied on Babcock for influence." This was after the
proof in the case clearly showed that Babcock had given the
ring no information whatever, and was intended to make it appear
that President Grant had really been corrupted through his means.
A more disgraceful Presidential " boom " never was known in this
country than that in aid of Bristow's nomination in 1876. Of
course, the shrewd Secretary of the Treasury saw at once the
advantage which this newspaper clamor against Grant and his
trusted secretary was giving him ; and his subordinate officers, the
solicitor to the Treasury and the District Attorney at St. Louis,
were willing to help him to the best of their ability. General
Henderson passed the bounds of discretion in his zeal to oblige
the Secretary whom he lo.oked upon as the rising sun. One of
the subordinate officers of the Government at St. Louis, Major
Eaton, telegraphed to the solicitor to the Treasury immediately on
the close of the Avery trial:
"Nov. 29, 1875. In three separate telegrams I have sent you the lang
uage, dates, and parties to ten telegrams between here and Washington.
Henderson, Dyer, and myself regard the prosecution of Babcock as now an
inevitable duty. We wish you to lay these telegrams before the Secretary
and Attorney General to-night if possible, and that you see to the fullest
compliance with sub poena duces sent on Saturday. Henderson skillfully
made a neat vindication of the President in course of proceedings."
THE ST. LOUIS WHISKY RING. 365
After the indictment of General) Babcock, the newspapers
fairly bubbled over with all kinds of gossip, the organs of Bris-
tow even outdoing the Democratic papers in the virulence of
their comment. District Attorney Dyer paid a visit to Washing
ton, and immediately there came out in a Bristow paper a dis
patch from its Washington correspondent, giving an account of
a pretended interview between him and Attorney General Pierre-
pont in the presence of Secretary Bristow, in which it was said,
— " Pierrepont told Dyer that he must return to St. Louis, and
proceed according to his own pleasure, but he explained that the
evidence against Babcock ought to be very sure and strong to
justify an indictment; that it would produce great scandal, deeply
mortify the President, and, if not sustained by a verdict of guilty,
would do great harm to all concerned. Bristow remarked rather
tartly, 'Do your duty, General Dyer, and the consequences will
take care of themselves.'" This entire story, so far as it is related
to himself, Mr. Pierrepont denounced as untrue. If true to the
letter, it contained nothing to his discredit; but it showed very
obtrusively the animus of the paper in which it appeared, to hold
Bristow forth to the world as a public spirited officer, who, in
his Brutus-like virtue, would not spare even the President himself.
What the President thought of Mr. Henderson's " neat vindi
cation" was shown by his dismissal, immediately after the close
of the Avery trial, from the further prosecution of these cases,
and the appointment of General Broadhead of St. Louis in his
place. Immediately there was a howl in all the Democratic
papers, and all sorts of accusations were brought against the
President. The Washington correspondent of the St. Louis
Republican ventured to say, — " Grant does not dare order a nol.
pros, in Babcock's case, but it is certain he has only been pre
vented from so doing by Pierrepont, and there is authority beyond
contradiction for the statement that he did actually order the
whole proceedings against Babcock stopped before the dismissal
of Henderson, and that action would have been taken if the
indignation over Henderson's discharge had not frightened Grant
too much." Honored as only two occupants of the Presidential
chair before him have been, — known and loved as he is now
known and loved, — it is impossible to recall such a diatribe as
this against the grand, silent hero without a blush of indignation,
366 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
Henderson did not take his dismissal with a good grace, but
for once confided in the correspondent of a Democratic news
paper, who reported him as "talking with a little party of
friends," — of whom the writer was no doubt one, — and saying,
"I doubt if people really understand how strong this case is
against Babcock. It ought to be presented to the public all
together and connectedly. The papers have published the evi
dence piece-meal, and then the telegrams by themselves, and
very few, aside from the attorneys in the case, understand how
complete is the web of proof." When the case was presented to
the public "all together and connectedly," the public saw fit to
reach the very opposite conclusion from that arrived at by General
Henderson.
The attitude of the President, while newspapers of the copper
head and mugwump stripe were busy defaming him, holding him
personally responsible for the wrong-doings, alleged or actual, of
men who owed their commissions to him, was the same as
always characterized him in all the crises of his fortune. Mag
nanimous, brave, as he had been under the fire of detraction in
the early stages of the war, he regarded this new phase of
copperhead warfare with the same calm indifference, trusting to
the good sense of his countrymen in the long run to do him
justice. When he was informed by a friend in St. Louis, a few
weeks after the seizure of the distilleries, that an effort was being
made there to connect his name with the whisky frauds on
account of his acquaintance with Macdonald and Joyce, and that
he was being slanderously assailed by members of the ring, he
quietly sent the letter to Secretary Bristow with the following
endorsement :
"July 29, 1875. Referred to the Secretary of the Treasury. This was
intended as a private letter for my information, and contained many extracts
from St. Louis papers not deemed necessary to forward. They are obtain
able, and I have no doubt have been read by the Federal officials in St.
Louis. I forward this for information, and to the end that if it throws any
light upon new parties to summon as witnesses they may be brought out.
Let no guilty man escape if it can be avoided. Be specially vigilant, or
instruct those engaged in the prosecution of fraud to be, against all who
insinuate that they have high influence to protect them. No personal con
sideration should stand in the way of performing public duty.
"U. S. GRANT."
Secretary Bristow caused the endorsement to be copied, and it
THE ST. LOUIS WHISKY RING. 367
was given to the public. It was acknowledged on all hands that
the prosecuting officers were materially aided by these manly
words of encouragement and cheer, and the ring in St. Louis was
proportionately demoralized. Nevertheless, the party organs would
not take General Grant at his word, and went on circulating their
defamatory statements concerning him, just as though he had
been proven to have in any way, by word or act, aided the
ring. The President never suffered himself to be moved from his
wonted serenity, and trod the path of duty, now made for him a
very thorny one, with as much apparent unconcern as though the
newspapers that abused him had no existence. But he refused to
be "vindicated" in General Henderson's "neat" fashion. He
would not allow a stain of suspicion to rest upon his name, and
this must have remained had it been possible to believe that his
private secretary, or anybody else, had influence enough to turn
him from the course of his plain duty in the interests of any
ring. He felt keenly that the attack upon Babcock was really
an assault upon himself as President. He knew that Babcock
was innocent of the charge made against him. The moment that
General Henderson's speech was made public, General Babcock
went to the President and explained all there was requiring expla
nation in regard to the telegrams by which it was sought to
connect him with the St. Louis ring. They were all susceptible
of explanation consistent with the entire innocence of General
Babcock; and as to some of them, President Grant himself
remembered the circumstances of their origin so clearly that he
was satisfied that this explanation had only to be made to the
country, and his private secretary would be fully vindicated. He
was not a man to desert his friends in the hour of peril ; indeed,
the steadfastness with which he stood by them until it had been
proved that they were unworthy of the confidence he had placed
in them was one of the heaviest accusations, — the only one, in
fact, — that ever was brought against this great soldier and states
man by his bitterest opponents in political life. He was sure of
the entire innocence of General Babcock ; he knew the purpose
for which Babcock was assailed ; he never took the slightest
o
notice of the attacks made upon himself by the American press,
but he stood by his friend all through the terrible ordeal to
which he was subjected. To one who conversed with him on
368 LIFE OF EMERY A STORKS.
the subject just after General Babcock had been indicted, he said:
"My confidence in General Babcock is unimpaired and undiminished.
With the light before me to-day and my knowledge of the man, if the
Government had any great work on hand requiring the services of a skillful
and faithful man as engineer, I know of no one whom, as Executive, I would
select in preference to General Babcock. The work he has done in this
city (Washington) is proof, as far as can be, of the correctness of this esti
mate. Since his time as Acting Commissioner of Public Grounds and Build
ings in Washington, members of Congress, in speaking of Ms work and the
improvement of the public grounds, have expressed great satisfaction, and
have said to me: 'Now we can see where the public money goes.' There
never has been a deficiency with General Babcock since his time as Acting
Commissioner."
And on the very day after the indictment was found, and he
had ordered the dissolution of the Chicago court-martial, he
addressed the following letter to the sorrowing wife of his maligned
secretary :
"WASHINGTON, December iyth, 1875.
'•EXECUTIVE MANSION.
" MY DEAR MRS. BABCOCK : — I know how much you must be distressed
at the publications of the day reflecting upon the integrity of your husband,
and write therefore to ask you to be of good cheer and wait for his full
vindication. I have the fullest confidence in his integrity, and of his inno
cence of the charges now made against him. After the intimate and confi
dential relations that have existed between him and myself for near four
teen years, during the whole of which time he has been one of my most
confidential aides and private secretary, I do not believe it possible that I
can be deceived. It is scarcely possible that he could, if so disposed, be
guilty of the crime now charged against him without at least having created
a suspicion in my mind. I have had no such suspicion heretofore, nor have
I now. His services to the government, in every capacity where he has
been employed, have been so valuable, and rendered with such a view to
its good, that it precludes the theory of his conspiring against it now.
"My confidence in General Babcock is the same now as it was when we
were together in the field, contending against the known enemies of the
government.
"With great confidence in the full vindication of him, I remain very
truly, "U. S. GRANT."
CHAPTER XXII.
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK.
I.
THE PROSECUTION.
MR. STORR5 RETAINED AS LEADING COUNSEL FOR THE DEFENSE OF GENERAL
BABCOCK — OPENING SPEECH OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY DYER — CON*
MEGRUE'S EVIDENCE RULED OUT— MR. STORRS' CROSS-EXAMINATION OF
THE GOVERNMENT WITNESSES— WHERE THE RING GOT THEIR INFORMATION
OF THE COMING OF REVENUE AGENTS — A CONSCIENTIOUS GAUGER — TESTI
MONY OF ABIJAH M. EVEREST — JOYCE'S HOCUS POCUS WITH THE TWO $$OO
BILLS— TESTIMONY OF THE COMMISSIONER AND DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF
INTERNAL REVENUE — ARGUMENT ON ADMISSION OF TELEGRAMS — "CHOPS
AND TOMATO SAUCE" — HOW COLONEL BROADHEAD ACCENTUATED A TELE
GRAM — JOYCE'S DECLARATIONS RULED OUT — TESTIMONY OF REVENUE
AGENT BROOKS — THE GOVERNMENT CASE CLOSED.
MR. STORRS, reputation as a brilliant, shrewd, sagacious
lawyer was now fully established. He stood at the head
of his profession in Chicago as a successful jury lawyer, and the
better informed of his legal brethren, both on the bench and at
the bar, had long ago begun to recognize that behind an almost
flippant readiness in all emergencies there was a solid reserve of
careful and laborious preparation, and that his sparkling wit and
humorous repartee were merely accessory to sound learning and
thorough mastery of all the points involved in the case with
which for the time being he had to deal. He had argued cases
before the Supreme Court of the United States at Washington,
and distinguished himself in the presence of that imposing forum
by the clearness of his logic, the luminousness of his statements
of fact, and his rare and happy faculty of hitting the very core
of the questions at issue, and impressing the Court, as he had
24 369
3/O LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
so many times impressed juries, with the force of the reasoning
he could bring to bear in favor of his own positions. The
crowning triumph of his career at the bar was achieved when
he was selected as the leading counsel for the defence of General
Babcock at St. Louis. The trial was one of national importance,
made so by the urgency with which the mugwumps and Demo
crats all over the country clamored in advance for a conviction,
and the equally firm determination of the President and his
friends that justice should be done. To have the principal
management of so great a case entrusted to him at this time
brought Mr. Storrs thenceforward into the front rank of Ameri
can advocates.
The trial of General Babcock for complicity in the St. Louis
whisky frauds came on in the United States Circuit Court at St.
Louis, on the 8th of February, 1876. The Judges before whom
•the case was tried were men of the highest reputation as jurists.
Judge Dillon was known to every student as an authority on the
law of corporations, and had only narrowly missed being appointed
Chief Justice of the United States. His associate, Judge Treat,
was one of the oldest Judges in the country. The counsel for
the prosecution were all well-known in the State of Missouri.
Colonel Broadhead, who relieved General Henderson after his
speech in the Avery trial, had been a gallant Union soldier, and
besides serving his State in both branches of the legislature, had
filled the office of United States District Attorney at St. Louis.
General Dyer, who was now District Attorney, studied law in
the office of Colonel Broadhead. Messrs. Eaton, Bliss, and Ped-
drick were the assistant attorneys for the prosecution.
Associated with Mr. Storrs for the defence were two gentle
men who had already held a conspicuous place before the public
as lawyers of the foremost rank. Judge J. K. Porter of New
York had just come out of the long, protracted and sensational
Beecher-Tilton case, in which he made a memorable speech for
the defence, and everybody recollects how ably he afterwards led
for the prosecution in the trial of the assassin Guiteau. With
them was ex-Attorney General Williams, who had been Chief
Justice of the Territory of Oregon, and its representative in the
United States Senate when it was admitted as a State. He was
a member of the High Joint Commission on the Alabama claims,
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. 371
and Attorney General of the United States from 1871 to 1875.
The local attorneys for the defence were Judge John M. Krum
and his son, Mr. Chester H. Krum.
Judge Porter having only arrived in St. Louis the previous
day, an adjournment was asked by Mr. Storrs and allowed, to
give the defendant's counsel an opportunity for consultation; and
the trial commenced on Tuesday, February 9th, lasting nearly to
the end of the month. By agreement, the jury was drawn from
the remnant of the September panel and a subsequent special
venire, the names of the whole number being drawn at random
on written slips shaken up indiscriminately in a box. No tech
nical challenges were resorted to by the defence, and in a sur
prisingly short time a jury was obtained, — the political prophets
who expected a vigorous fight on the part of the defendant in
the selection of a jury being egregiously out in their calculations.
General Babcock's counsel thus showed at the outset their abso
lute confidence in the merits of their case and their client. The
opening speech for the Government was made by District Attor
ney Dyer. After reciting the history of the St. Louis ring, of
which an outline has already been given, he came down to the
point where it was expected that the prosecution would be able
to prove the connection of General Babcock with the conspiracy.
This was to be done by the introduction of the telegrams on
which General Henderson based his remarks in the Avery case.
Collector Ford had died in Chicago in October 1873, while on
a visit to friends there. Joyce thereupon opened a correspondence
with General Babcbck as to the appointment of a successor to
Ford, giving Babcock to understand that he wished to have the
vacant place. General Babcock laid Joyce's application before
the President; but General Grant decided, that as Mr. Ford had
died away from home, and his accounts might have to be settled
up, the bondsmen of Collector Ford should be allowed to recom
mend a successor. General Babcock therefore telegraphed back
to Joyce in these words: — " See that Ford's bondsmen recommend
you for Collector for this district." Joyce telegraphed back, —
" The bondsmen prefer the man that they have recommended,"
and a telegram was sent to the President by these bondsmen,
recommending Colonel Constantine Maguire. The President there
upon appointed Maguire; but Joyce again foisted himself upon
372 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
the attention of the secretary with a despatch — " See the despatch
sent to the President; we mean it; mum." It was quite clear, —
and the case for the defence, when it came to be presented, left
no room for doubt, — that Joyce had nothing whatever to do
with securing the appointment of Maguire as collector at St-
Louis. But the prosecuting attorneys saw something suspicious
in the words, " we mean it ; mum ; " and particularly in the last
word, "mum." Mr. Dyer contended that this word indicated a
secret understanding already established between Joyce and Bab-
cock as to whisky matters in St. Louis. When the entire corres
pondence between Babcock and Joyce was put in evidence by
the defence, it was seen to bear a perfectly harmless construction.
Early in 1874, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue ordered
Joyce to go to San Francisco, and the point was made by the
District Attorney that this was done by Commissioner Douglass
because he had begun to suspect Joyce's integrity. When the
Commissioner came on the stand as a witness for the Govern
ment, however, he did not sustain this view of his action. Just
before Joyce left, he telegraphed to General Babcock, — " Make
D. call off his scandal hounds, that only blacken the memory of
Ford and friends." This was construed to mean that Babcock
knew of previous frauds to which Ford was a party, and was
asked to use his influence with the Commissioner to prevent
investigation. Joyce was absent from St. Louis for some months,
during which no illicit whisky was made; but directly on his
return operations were resumed. He -gave Fitzroy a memorandum
of assignments of gangers and storekeepers to the distilleries
which he wished to be made, and Collector Maguire made the
assignments in conformity with that list. Directly after this,
Joyce visited Washington on the pretence of reporting in person
to Commissioner Douglass as to his work in San Francisco, but
in reality to find out what was being done in the way of sending
out detective agents, and to ascertain the feeling of the Depart
ment. He telegraphed back to Macdonald, — " Things look all
right here; let the machine go;" and two days afterwards he
telegraphed to Macdonald, — "Matters are in good shape here; go
it lively." In October 1874, Joyce was advised by telegram from
Avery of the raid which Commissioner Douglass was then preparing.
The despatch was thus worded, — "Your friend is in New York,
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. 373
and may come out to see you." The friend referred to was Mr.
Brooks, one of the most trusted secret agents of the Treasury
Department. On the 25th of that month, Joyce telegraphed to
Babcock, — " Have you talked with D.? Are things right? How?"
No answer to this telegram was found; in fact, none was sent.
The next telegram from Joyce to General Babcock was dated
December 3d, and was in these words, — "Has Secretary or Com
missioner ordered anybody here?" To this General Babcock
replied, two days afterwards, — "Can't hear that any one has gone
or is going." Macdonald went to Washington in the early part
of December, and on a visit to the Commissioner's office found a
letter from Brooks to Deputy Commissioner Rogers, in which the
proposed raid was discussed. He took a copy of the letter to
General Babcock, and called his attention to the following passage
in it: — "May I ask that any Western case you think we can
work shall be put in such a state that we can take charge of it,
and so make the trip profitable to the Department and satisfactory
to ourselves." The phrase, "satisfactory to ourselves," he sug
gested to Babcock, had a blackmailing look, and asked the
General to see Commissioner Douglass about it. In the meantime
he himself went to Deputy Commissioner Rogers, and boldly
made a protest, on the strength of the information the purloined
letter had given him. He said to Rogers, "I don't want you to
tell me anything, but I have something to tell you. You have
ordered revenue agents into my district, and I protest against it.
If your officers there are fit to be there, you ought to trust them ;
if not, turn them out." Rogers never knew until the Avery trial
how Macdonald came by his information, but seeing that the
secret expedition which the Department had planned was known
to Macdonald, it was abandoned. In a few days afterwards,
General Babcock met Commissioner Douglass, and was informed
by him that the contemplated raid was not to take place.
Macdonald having appealed to him in the matter, General Bab
cock, as soon as he learned this, sent the following telegram to
Macdonald. — "I have succeeded; they will not come; I will write
you." To this despatch he put the signature, "Sylph;" and the
occult meaning of that word exercised the ingenuity of prosecuting
counsel and newspaper reporters all through the trial. This tele
gram, with its unintelligible signature, was taken as proof that
374 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
Babcock was a member of the St. Louis whisky ring! Joyce
undoubtedly used it among the distillers with a view to create
that impression, and to reassure them in their manufacture of
illicit whisky. In January 1875, Commissioner Douglass addressed
a letter to the Secretary of the Treasury advising that the Super
visors and Revenue Agents be changed from one district to
another, and under the order which the Secretary made, Macdonald
and Joyce were transferred to Philadelphia, and the officers of
corresponding rank there were ordered to St. Louis. Macdonald
at once telegraphed .to the Commissioners, — "Don't like the
order; it will damage the Government and injure the administra
tion." Other Revenue officers protested, and the order was
subsequently revoked by order of the President. It was charged
that General Babcock had used his influence with the President
to secure the revocation of this order; and this was the improper
interference with the action of Commissioner Douglas to which
General Henderson referred in his speech in the Avery case. In
March, 1875, m answer to a letter from Macdonald about the
movements in Washington of a citizen of St. Louis whom he
supposed to be trying to oust him from his place, General
Babcock sent Macdonald the following telegram: — "Letter received.
Have seen the gentleman, and he seems very friendly. Is here
looking after improvements of river." This telegram was also put
in evidence as proof of General Babcock's complicity in the
whisky frauds; and the four despatches sent by him as above
recited are positively all the documentary proof the prosecution
were able to find against him.
The charge against General Babcock, then, as outlined by District
Attorney Dyer, rested upon four telegrams sent by Joyce and
Macdonald. and upon the peculiarly worded telegrams from Joyce
to Babcock, which were construed as evidence that Babcock was
a member of the St. Louis ring, and aiding its operations by his influ
ence in Washington. In support of this theory, the prosecuting
attorneys introduced the testimony of several of the conspirators,
of the revenue agent Brooks, who made the final seizure, and of
the Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
From the opening speech of General Dyer, it was apparent that
the Government had mapped out an unnecessarily broad line of
investigation, with the object of giving to the four telegrams of
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. 375
Babcock a meaning which they did not on their face convey.
The first witness called was Fitzroy, and he was interrogated as
to the operations of the ring while Megrue was its chief director.
To this line of investigation Mr. Storrs objected, because, as he
said, " the conspiracy under Megrue was a complete and finished
piece of scoundrelism in itself, and after he left, there was a period
of sunshine upon honest whisky in St. Louis." There was no
pretence that General Babcock had any connection with a ring
in 1871. Megrue was on hand to testify to whatever the Govern
ment might ask ; but the Court sustained Mr. Storrs' objection,
and Megrue and all his unsavory revelations were ruled out. The
investigation was thus narrowed down to the ring operations from
1873, when Joyce became its chief manipulator.
Several of the convicted distillers and rectifiers gave their testi
mony ; and it may be as well here to give the substance of their
statements, without regard to the order in which they were put
upon the witness stand. They testified that in the fall of 1872 a
revenue agent named Brashear was sent to St. Louis, for whom
they raised £io,OOO. One distiller said, "he caught us bad," but
nevertheless, on receiving his bribe, he sent on a favorable report
to Washington. In 1872, Joyce persuaded them to resume the
making of illicit whisky, and one distiller testified that it was
through Joyce's representations that he was induced to go into the
business against his better judgment, and that Joyce was continually
complaining that they did not make enough. Whenever a revenue
agent was expected from Washington, Joyce always gave them
notice of his coming, so that they could put their houses in order
and no trace of crookedness be discovered. They had several
notifications of this kind during the fall of 1874. Mr. Engelke, a
rectifier, said that during 1873, l874, and the spring of 1875,
there never was a revenue agent in St. Louis whose coming was
not known beforehand. On one occasion Joyce showed him a
telegram in the Planters' House, folding the signature underneath
so that he could not see it ; and on the information conveyed in
that telegram he straightened up his house. Mr. Bevis, of the
firm of Bevis & Fraser, distillers, testified that his house was
informed in December 1874 of a raid to be made by Mr. Brooks
and another revenue agent named Hoag ; but afterwards Joyce
showed him and his partner a letter which reassured them, and
they went on making illicit whisky down to January 1875.
3/6 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
The cross-examination of these witnesses was admirably man
aged by Mr. Storrs. It has been universally acknowledged that
in the art of handling a witness, and getting out just what he
wanted and no more, Mr. Storrs was as consummate a tactician
as he was eloquent and convincing in argument. This was never
better proved than during the Babcock* trial. Although he only
, cross-examined one of the distillers himself, he directed and shaped
the course to be taken in the cross-examination of all of them. That
there had been a conspiracy was taken for granted; and the cross-
examination was strictly confined to bringing out facts which would
be serviceable to the defence. All the distillers were interrogated,
therefore, mainly as to the proceedings of the revenue agent Hoag,
who visited St. Louis with Mr. Brooks in the spring of 1874 to
investigate as to the burning of the books at Bevis and Eraser's
distillery, which contained damaging evidence of previous frauds.
Mr. Brooks found sufficient material to enable him to go before
the grand jury and have Bevis and Eraser indicted, and they
compromised the case by paying to the Government $40,000.
During the stay of Hoag in St. Louis, the distillers raised for
him $10,000. "This money was raised," said one, "because
Hoag was the confidential agent of the Revenue Department,
and was consulted a good deal in regard to raids to be made,
and could give us a good deal of information." Another said,
"The money to Hoag was paid for a favorable report, keeping
his hands off in future, and keeping us apprised of future move
ments." This was rendered still more explicit by Mr. Storrs'
cross-examination of Eraser, and we cannot do better than give
a few of Mr. Storrs' incisive questions, and the answers of this
witness :
"Q. 'Do you know John T. Hoag? A. Yes, sir.'
"Q. 'How long have you known him? A. I met him here, I think, in
April or May, 1874.'
"Q. 'Did you have any conversation with him in April or May, 1874,
about whisky matters? A. Well, Brooks and Hoag came here to investi
gate affafrs here.'
"Q. 'And they did investigate affairs did they? A. Yes, sir.'
"Q. 'Did you make Hoag's acquaintance during the investigation? A. Yes,
sir.'
"Q. 'That was the time you were taken into camp and made to pay
about £40,000, wasn't it? A. Yes, sir.'
"(2- 'Did you make the acquaintance of Hoag pretty intimately at that time?
A. No, sir.1
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. 377
"Q. 'Did you have a pretty thorough knowledge of him in any way, direct
or indirect, at that time? A. Well, I met him several times.'
"Q. 'Did you ascertain, at that time, that he was susceptible to bribes?
A. I did not at that time.'
"Q. 'When did you first discover that he was pliant? A. I think it was
some time after that.'
" Q. 'During the summer of 1874? A. Yes, sir, either the summer or fall.'
" Q. 'You had telegraphic communication with John T. Hoag during the
summer of 1874 didn't you? A. I think I had some communication with
him in the fall or winter of 1874.'
"Q. 'Did he give you information as to contemplated raids here? A. He
did.'
"Q. 'There is no doubt about that, is there, Mr. Fraser? A. No, sir.'
"Q. 'How much did you pay for that information? A. Ten thousand
dollars.'
"Q. 'Did you pay it to him after the information was given or before?
A. I think he gave me the information afterwards.'
" Q. 'Isn't it a fact that information communicated to one distiller was,
4 in your usual course of business,' communicated to the others — that which
was of interest to them, so far as seizure and raids were concerned? A.
Yes, sir.'
"Q. 'You all had a common interest in that business? A. Yes, sir.'
"Q. 'When, to your knowledge, was Hoag first seduced? A. I had a con
versation, I think, with Hoag, some time in November or December, '74.
My impression is, it was in November. I am not certain about that.'
"Q. 'Did he express any anxiety to render you service, or the distillery
interests generally? A. Yes, sir.'
"Q. 'He was quite willing to arrange it for a consideration ? A. Yes, sir.'
"Q. 'Didn't you receive, on the 5th of April, '75, a dispatch from him at
Xenia, Ohio? A. I don't know.'
"Q. 'I will read you the dispatch: 'Have to go to Indiana, Monday.
Can you come there — Bates House? Bixby.' Did you receive such a dis
patch as that? A. I may have received it.'
" Q. 'Do you remember it now, your attention having been called to it ?
A. We received some dispatch to meet him in Indiana ; I don't remem
ber the wording of it.'
"Q. 'April 8 — Cleveland — 'Your letter forwarded here; report about B.
[Brooks I suppose] ' coming to St. Louis incorrect ; he is here with me ;
Bixby.' Do you remember receiving such a dispatch as that? A. I may
have received that dispatch.'
" Q. 'Now, Mr. Fraser, please think about it? Can't you put that a lit
tle stronger; you may have received it? A. I have nothing to fix the mat
ter in my mind; I don't remember positively.'
" Q. 'Don't you think you received a dispatch of this character — this is of
some importance, we think — ' your letter forwarded here ; report about B.
coming to St. Louis' — that's Brooks? A. Yes, sir.'
"Q. 'Did you not, on or about April, i6th, '75, receive this dispatch:
378 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
'Did you get my telegram; would rather see you here. If you want
to see me, answer.
" BIXBY.' "
"Q. 'Do you remember meeting Hoag in response to that? A. I remem
ber meeting him once ; I don't know whether it was in response to that."
" Q. 'Do you remember meeting him in Cincinnati? A. Yes, sir.'
" Q. ' Bixby' was his assumed name, was it not? A. Yes, sir.'
"Q. 'Were you in 'communication with Hoag frequently? A. Whenever
I had occasion to communicate with him, I did.'
"Q. 'And he communicated with you whenever he thought it was neces
sary? A. Yes, sir.1
" Q. 'Kept you well posted from the time he was 'retained' by you, as
to contemplated raids in St. Louis? A. I suppose he did.'
" Q. 'Don't you know he *did, as results have turned out? A. Yes, sir.'
"Q. 'He was in a position to know, wasn't he, and you considered him
a faithful and vigilant servant for the distilling interest in St. Louis? A.
Yes, sir, we considered him trustworthy.'"
Mr. Barton, the manager in St. Louis for Bingham Brothers,
who lived in Indiana, testified that the distilleries had to shut
down even on crooked whisky because the market was glutted,
— the honest tax-paid product having been fairly beaten out of
the market. Mr. Bingham once sent him a -letter signed "Bixby,"
giving notice of the coming of revenue agents.*
The testimony of the distillers on the part of the Government
was supplemented by that of the revenue officers who acted as
ring collectors. Fitzroy we may speedily dismiss. Having told
the story of the doings of the ring while he was its collector, he
testified that in the spring of 1875 ne raised $5000 from the dis
tillers on a pretence that Macdonald was going to Washington to
use it for the purpose of preventing seizures, and that if Macdon
ald did not succeed in this it was to be returned. He also
admitted having been at the Collector's office one Sunday in
November 1873, when Joyce and Bevis and others burned some
forms of reports to the Collector which contained evidence of
fraud at Bevis and Eraser's distillery, which was followed up by
the destruction of Bevis and Eraser's distillery books, the invest
igation into which resulted in their being indicted and settling
for $40,000. A gauger named Bassett gave an interesting piece
of testimony, to the effect that he "neglected" to cancel the
revenue stamps at one of the distilleries so that they might be
used over again, and found in his overcoat pocket next day an
envelope containing $100. After this he was careful to neglect
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. 379
the canceling of the stamps, and the surreptitious packages that
found their way into his overcoat pocket increased in value to
$150 and sometimes $200. One day such an envelope was laid
on his desk, and finally Bevis had courage enough to hand the
bribe to him in person. His view of the transaction was elicited
on cross-examination by the counsel for the defence; "I did not
take the money as a bribe ; it was an accommodation both ways."
Every day of the trial had its sensational features for the news
papers, and on the second day much excitement was caused by
the announcement that the counsel for the defence intended to
take the President's deposition. " At this moment," says a news
paper report, " no man drew a breath that could be audible, and
intense attention was bestowed to the lightest word. The idea of
bringing the evidence of the Executive of the Nation in defence
of one of his trusted officers appeared to strike everybody as
though it were new. The possibility of this thing had been hinted
at for some days, but this fact when presented in its naked cer
tainty, seemed to make an impression altogether unlocked for."
Mr. Storrs asked for an adjournment in order that counsel on
both sides might consult and settle upon interrogatories to be for
warded to Washington and answered by the President. He said,
— " We had intended, at first, to have the personal attendance of
the President as a witness in this case, but from the way the
case stands now we think we can dispense with his personal attend
ance. We are anxious to do this in consequence of the difficulty
of securing his presence, owing to the exigencies of public affairs,
requiring his attendance at Washington. We desire the counsel on
the other side to proffer with us the interrogatories to be made
of him, and then to have his testimony taken before the Chief
Justice." In this proposition the counsel for the Government con
curred, and after recess General Dyer asked for a further adjourn
ment for thd day, stating that the prosecution wished to prepare
counter-interrogatories and send a messenger with them to Wash
ington without delay. In granting the adjournment, Judge Dillon
said, — " It is well known to us that the Congress of the United
States is in session, and the statement made by counsel as to the
inexpediency of the President of the United States leaving the
capital at this time is probably correct, and it may save time to
allow the parties to devote the afternoon for that testimony."
380 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
On the third day a new sensation was developed, when the
truant ring collector, Abijah M. Everest, was put upon the stand
to tell all he knew about the doings of the ring. Important
revelations, directly connecting General Babcock with the St.
Louis ring, were expected from this witness. Down to this
point there had been nothing of the sort; but now the Govern
ment expected to supply the connecting link. After stating in
lengthy detail his own proceedings as ring collector, and telling
how he was sent by Joyce in April 1875 to get $5000 from
Eraser, which Joyce told him Macdonald was going to take to
Washington "for our friends," he was led by General Dyer
directly up to the point where it was to be made to appear that
he knew of Joyce sending two $500 bills by mail, one to Avery
and the other to General Babcock. The crowded audience list
ened with breathless interest while he testified that in the latter
part of February 1875, Joyce gave him a package containing
$1000 in small bills, and asked him to go to the Sub-Treasurer's
office and have them changed into two $500 bills, which he did,
and carried the two $500 bills back to Joyce. His account of
Joyce's behaviour on this occasion we prefer to take from the
verbatim report:
" Q. 'I will get you to state whether, in 1875, at any time before April,
you were present in the office of the Supervisor, and had a conversation
with Joyce in reference to money at any time other than the day you met
them each week? A. I remember, in 1875, he was —
"Mr. Krum. 'When.'
" Q. by Mr. Dyer: 'State when and where you had a conversation with
him in reference to the matter. A. It was in the Supervisor's office in
1875.'
"Mr. Krum, 'When? A. February or March — along, I think, in the
latter part of February.'
"Q. by Mr. Dyer: 'Well? A. He asked me about—'
"Mr. Storrs. 'One moment —
" Mr. Dyer. ' This is an act, or accompanying an act.' •
" Mr. Storrs. ' I would like to have the witness receive the same admoni
tion from your Honors that he has already received.'
" Q. by the Court: 'Was this conversation in connection with any act
that Joyce requested you to perform? A. Yes, sir.'
"Q 'Did you perform that act? A. I did.'
"The Court. 'Go on.'
" Witness. ' He gave me a package of one thousand dollars and told me
to go to the Sub-Treasurer's office and have it changed into two five hun
dred dollar bills.'
\
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. 38!
" Q. 'State what the denominations of the bills you carried to the Sub-
Treasury were ? A. Some of them were ten dollar bills, some fifty, and
perhaps some twenty dollar bills.'
"Q. 'Well? A. I gave him the two five hundred dollar bills; I went
back to the office and gave them to Colonel Joyce.'
"Q. 'Who was in the office at the time? A. Nobody.'
" Q. 'After you gave him the bills, what did he do with them? A. He
separated the bills and looked at both of them, and he picked up two
envelopes, laying on the desk, and put them in the envelopes.'
"Q. By the Court: 'Into separate envelopes? A. Yes, sir.'
"Q. By Mr. Dyer: 'Go on and state now, in your own way, what he
did, and what you did? A. I gave him the money and he took up the
envelopes, both of them, and put one bill in one envelope and I pre
sume the other in another —
"Mr. Storrs. 'Hold on; we don't want a particle of presumption.'
"The Court. 'State what you know.'
"Witness. 'He picked up both envelopes, examined the bills, took one
$500 bill, put that in an envelope, and transferred it to the rear of the
other one. He then pulled out a letter, and placed the other £500 bill
in the other envelope.'
"Q. 'Then what did he do? A. He then sealed the envelopes, and
he talked a little while, and he gave me the envelopes to put in the Post-
office.'
" Q. 'When he gave you them, what did he say to you? A. He asked
me if I wouldn't put them in the box, across the street from his office,
which I did.' '
General Dyer's next question was whether Everest observed
the addresses on the envelopes. To this question the defence
objected, and the remainder of the forenoon was taken up with
argument on the competency of the evidence. Judge Krum con
tended that it was inadmissible unless the prosecution were
prepared to follow it up by proof that General Babcock actually
received the ' letter. Judge Porter followed, insisting that the
Government must first show by direct proof that General Bab-
cock was a party to the conspiracy, before they could introduce
acts or declarations of any of the other conspirators to bind him.
The mailing of a letter to him by one of the conspirators would
not prove him to be a conspirator. No connection had yet been
shown between General Babcock and the parties in St. Louis.
Mr. Storrs argued that to admit this evidence in the present
state of the case would be "a violation of the fundamental prin
ciples of evidence which are based on the sound construction of
public policy, the maintenance of which is indispensable for the
382 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
protection of private rights and civil liberty. The danger," he
said, "attending prosecutions of this character is one which has
brought this class of actions into such disfavor, wherever the
common law prevails, that a man may be indicted and convicted
not from any word he has ever uttered, not from any act he has
ever done, but by the utterance and from the acts of others ; and
it is because of this distinguishing feature about it that for the
last two hundred years the wisdom of the wisest men that have
ever presided in courts of justice has been directed to restraining
testimony within the narrowest possible limits, because by its
enlargement persecution might succeed and the innocent might
suffer. We have not yet reached that stage," he said, "where there is
any certainty that the money went into the envelopes. The pro
cess of handing them, the dexterous manipulation of them, is
already detailed by the witness, and the carrying of them to the
letter box and the depositing of them; and they now propose to
prove that one of them was addressed to General Babcock. Now,
so far as the declarations which accompanied these acts are con
cerned, I ask your Honors to pause and consider — are they Mr.
Babcock's ? Twelve hundred miles of distance separated him
from the spot where this act was performed. Hence the declar
ations are not admissible to convict him. If they are acts, whose
acts? We are willing to stand by our acts. They are not the
acts of Babcock. No pretense is made that they are his acts,
but the acts of Joyce and the witness on the stand.
Mr. Storrs contended that the receipt of this $500 had not
been and could not be proven, and this evidence having no tend
ency to establish General Babcock's connection with the conspir
acy, it ought to be excluded. At the afternoon session Judge
Dillon gave the decision of the Court, overruling the objections
and admitting the evidence, not as raising a conclusive presump
tion that Babcock received the letter, but as tending to show that
fact. Referring to and overruling Mr. Storrs' objection that the
evidence, even if allowed, had no probative force, he said :
"If it was admitted here by the counsel for the Government that this was
all the evidence which they expected to produce for the purpose of connect
ing the defendant with the alleged conspiracy, its inconclusive character
standing alone, in a case where the defendant's mouth is sealed, would
doubtless be such as that the court would be bound to say to the jury that
it could not be safely made the basis of a conclusion inculpating the defen
dant.
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. 383
" It may not have been actually received ; the writer may not have been
known ; his purpose may not have been known, or the person who received
it may not have known why it was sent, or may not have invited it, or
have known that it was in any way connected with the guilty purpose ascribed
to it by the prosecution, or any illegal purpose or plan ; and, as men act
differently under the same circumstances, it is for the jury, under proper
instructions from the court, to look at the letter, if it was sent and received,
in connection with all the other circumstances in evidence."
The court having admitted the evidence, Everest was again
called to the stand, and General Dyer attempted, by a leading
question, to make the witness swear that the two $500 bills were
actually, to his knowledge, put into the envelopes and mailed.
How watchfully this was met and prevented by Mr. Storrs from
going on record is best shown by recurrence to the verbatim
report :
"Colonel Dyer (to the witness.) 'You stated, Mr. Everest, that Colonel
Joyce, on the occasion referred to by you, handed to you two sealed envel
opes, containing two $500 bills?'
"Mr. Storrs. 'I object to the question; I object to the statement of the
question by the counsel.'
"Judge Dillon. 'Let the witness restate what he said in that regard.'
"Colonel Dyer. 'Restate, then, if you please, to the jury, what you said
in regard to the two envelopes after you received them from Joyce. A.
When Colonel Joyce handed me those two envelopes he directed me to put
them in the letter-box opposite the office, which I did.'
" Q. 'Where was Joyce at the time you deposited the letters in the letter
box? A. He was watching me from the window.'
"Q. 'At the time you deposited the letters, did you observe him at that
time? A. I saluted him and he saluted me.' "
He then testified that he observed the addresses on the
envelopes, and that one was to W. O. Avery and the other to
General Babcock.
He was put through a searching cross-examination by Mr.
Storrs. "Everest evidently expected to get a pretty rough hand
ling, and he got it, but not, perhaps, in the precise way he had
anticipated. Mr. Storrs' manner, while perfectly urbane — in fact,
oppressively polite — was sufficient to bring the beads of perspira
tion profusely on to the brow of the witness, who tried his best
to testify only to what suited himself, but who found that very
thing just an impossibility. He was taken and twisted about in
all sorts of ways; his answers to apparently trivial questions were
retorted on him with a rasping sarcasm which was all the more
384 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
severe that it was done in suclf an excessively amiable way; he
was held up to ridicule and pursued to contempt, and finally was
made to admit that he did not see the money put into one of
the envelopes, and could not be positive that it had been sent
at all to the defendant. He was furthermore compelled to admit
on three several occasions that he had informed Colonel Dyer as
to his want of positive knowledge as to the fact he had but
recently sworn to."
One brief extract from this cross-examination will be sufficient
to illustrate , Mr. Storrs' method:
"Q. 'Can you fix the date acccurately as to when you mailed these envel
opes to which you have testified? A. No, sir, I cannot.'
"Q. 'Can you tell us the month? A. It was in the early part of Feb
ruary or March.'
"Q. 'February or March, 1875? A. Yes, sir.'
" Q. 'Where did you receive this money in the first place? A. In the
Supervisor's office.'
"Q. 'Who was present? A. Nobody.'
"Q. 'You first brought the two $500 bills to Colonel Joyce? A. Yes, sir.'
" Q. 'Now, will you describe to the jury and all of us whether Colonel
Joyce stood or sat when that money was put in the envelopes? A. He
stood.'
"Q. 'In front of you? A. In front of his desk.'
"Q. 'Picked up the envelope there, did he? A. He picked up the two
envelopes.'
"Q. 'Had the envelopes already been addressed before you handed him
the money — the two $500 bills? A. Yes. sir.'
"Q. 'Were the envelopes open or sealed? A. They were unsealed.'
" Q. 'You came and handed him the $500 bills? Yes, sir.''
" Q. 'You saw him take up the envelopes? Yes, sir.'
"Q. 'He stood up while he went through the operation of putting the
money into the envelopes? Yes, sir.'
"Q. 'Was there a desk between you and Colonel Joyce? A. No, sir.'
" Q. ' You sat upon the same side of the desk that he did? A. He stood —
" Q. 'Answer my question. Did you sit upon the same side of the desk
upon which he stood? A. I was sitting to his left.'
" Q. 'Was he facing you when he filled those envelopes? A. No, sir.'
" Q. 'Was his back turned toward you? A. No, sir.'
" Q. '\Vas he standing sideways to you? A. He was.'
"Mr. Storrs (standing up and pointing to a post near him). 'Your rela
tive positions would be about this, Colonel Joyce standing towards you sit
ting there? A. About six feet off.'
"(2- 'And Joyce had those envelopes in his hands? A. Yes, sir.'
" Q. 'That is about the description of it, isn't it? A. Yes, sir.'
" Q. 'Did he change these envelopes at all while this process was going
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. 385
on? A. Yes, sir; he first took the two envelopes up, and pulled a piece of
paper half way out ; he then took one of the bills and put it in that envel
ope, or that piece, and put the letter back again.'
"Q. 'Are you prepared to say you saw him put the other bill in; isn't it
merely a presumption in your mind?'
" Witness. ' I was just going to state how it was.'
"Mr. Storrs. 'Just answer that question.'
"Witness. 'What is the question?'
"Mr. Storrs. 'The question is this: Are you prepared to state that, in
the other envelope, you saw him place the other $500 bill? A. No, sir, I
am not.'
"Q. 'That is what you meant when you said, this morning, that you pre
sumed he did? A. Yes, sir.'
"Q. 'Then the amount of it, Mr. Everest, is just this: That you did see
Joyce put a $500 bill into one envelope, and you presume that he did in
the rother, but you don't know, you didn't see him put it there. A. I didn't
see him.'
"Q. 'Now, that is just it exactly; and therefore you don't know that he
put it in ? A. I am not positive.'
"Q. 'No, no, no, of course not; as to one of those envelopes you don't
know of your own knowledge whether he put a $500 bill in or not? A. I
said I didn't see one ; I said —
"Q. 'And whether it was the one directed to Avery or the one directed
to Babcock you wont undertake to tell the jury? A. No, sir.' "
He was next asked about his European travels, and finally
brought up in the city of Rome.
" Q. ' You wouldn't have gone to see Rome but for some apprehension as
to your fate in your native city? A. I don't think I should.'
" Q. 'How long did you stay at Rome? A. Perhaps three or four
weeks ; I don't remember — three or four.'
" Q. 'Had you finished seeing Rome when you left? A. Well, I don't
know.'
" Q. 'Will you be good enough to state to the jury why you left Rome?
A. I received a notice from my brother to return home.'
" Q. 'What was the nature of your notice, please? A. A dispatch to
come home.'
" Q. ' Did he tell you why you should come? A. No, sir.'
"Q. 'Did he indicate to you that it would be safe to come? A. No,
sir.'
"Q. 'Didn't you agree upon some signal, cipher, or form of words or
other, by which you were to come if you received it? A. No, sir.'
"Q. 'What would you come for upon the notification of your brother?
It wasn't business that called you here, was it? A. I suppose he wouldn't
telegraph to me without he wanted me to come. ' ' '
He then described how he met McFall, one of the indicted
25
386 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
gaugers, in New York on his return, and went with him to
Philadelphia, where he had an interview with General Dyer.
"(2- 'Was McFall boarding in New York when you went to Europe? A.
No, sir.'
" Q. ' Is he boarding in New York now? A. No, sir.'
" Q. ' He is a resident of St. Louis, is he not? A. I believe he is.'
" Q. 'Will you please to state how you happened to light upon him at
Thirty-first street? A. I went there.'
"(2. 'It was not instinct, of course? A. No; I went there to see my
brother.'
"Q. 'Was your brother stopping at Thirty-first street? A. Yes, sir.'
" Q. 'Did he come down with McFall? A. I guess he did.'
" Q. 'It begins to look probable. How long had McFall and your brother
been at Thirty-first street? A. I don't know.'
" Q. 'Was that the first occasion that you saw McFall, at that boarding-
house? A. Yes, sir.'
" Q. 'What special interest did McFall have in your going to Philadel
phia? A. Friendship.'
"Q. 'Pure, unadulterated friendship? A. Yes, sir.'
"Q. 'Were there any other interests? A. I don't know.'
" Q. 'Your friendship with him was strong? A. Yes, sir.'
"(2- 'Do you want the jury to understand that it was merely from con
siderations of friendship that you went to Philadelphia to meet McFall at
the Bingham House ? A. No, sir. If you will allow me I will make a
voluntary statement.'
"Mr. Storrs. 'The best way for us to get along nicely is not for you to
make any voluntary statement ; answer my questions, and we will get along
very nicely. How long did you remain in Philadelphia? A. About five days.'
" Q. 'Who else did you see there? A. I saw Mr. Dyer.'
"Q. 'You have given in your testimony to Dyer since your return in
this city, have you not, Mr. Everest? A. Yes, sir.'
" Q. 'Did you then state to Colonel Dyer that in one of these envelopes
you could not state that there was placed a $500 bill? A. I did.'
" Q. 'And you could not tell whether that was the envelope directed to
Babcock or Avery ? A. I did.'
"Q. 'Do you wish in this court and before this jury, as a continual
recurrence, to be understood as saying that in one of these envelopes you
did not see any money put at all, and that whether it was the Babcock or
the Avery letter you cannot tell? A. Yes, sir.'
" Q. 'Now, Mr. Everest, tell us quite frankly whether there was not the
slightest pressure to have you remember that $500 was put in both enve
lopes? A. No, sir; not a bit.'
"(2- 'Nobody wanted you to remember that? A. No, si-r.'
" Q. 'Will you please state to the jury why in delivering your testimony
upon direct examination, you did not say squarely as you have now, that in
one of these envelopes you did not see a £500 bill? A. I have no reason.
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. 387
"Q. 'Mr. Everest, are you indicted here in this district? A. I don't
know ; the paper said I was.'
" Q. ' Have you been told so? A. No, sir.'
"Q. 'The balance of your opinion is that you are not indicted, from the
most authentic information that you can obtain on the subject ?' [No ans
wer.]
"Q. 'Your interest in the subject is not sufficient to induce some little
inquiry on your part? A. I made no inquiry about it.'
"Q. 'Don't it concern you? A. Yes, sir.'
"Q. 'There are twelve indictments against you? A. I am sure I don't
know how many.'
"Q. 'Never counted them up or pleaded to any of them? A. No, sir.'
"Q. 'Never been arrested on any of them? A. No, sir.'
"Q. 'Can you tell what sort of talismanic influence you possess with the
officers by which you have been thus favored? A. No, sir.'
"Q. 'No bargain, I presume? A. No, sir.'
"Q. 'Well, no understanding? A. No, sir.'
" Q. ' You arrived here an indicted man, absolutely free to go where you
please ; ' no one to molest or make you afraid ; ' that is about the condition
you find yourself in, isn't it? A. I go about.'
"Q. 'You simply rely upon something or other; what is it you rely upon?
A. Nothing at all.'
"Q. 'You have no reliance? A. No, sir.'
"Q. 'Mr. Everest, you came all the way from Rome here to testify,
didn't you? A. I don't know.'"
The Chicago Times, in its account of Everest's examination,
said, — " The fact that such exertions were made to bring back
Everest, on the part of the Government, and that he has been so
sedulously guarded up to the day of trial, caused a good deal of
speculation as to his testimony. The prosecution have not done
with Everest what was promised in the District Attorney's open
ing. Mr. Storrs forced out of Everest some damaging admissions,
which greatly weakened the force if they did not annul
the direct evidence. The witness fell into the trap, and in
fifteen minutes his evidence, gotten in after so much argument,
was shattered."
Another point which the government proposed to make
against Babcock was shattered the next day. Major Grimes, U.
S. Quartermaster at St. Louis, gave evidence that, at the request
of General Babcock, he had allowed that gentleman to send let
ters to Macdonald under cover to his address, after Macdonald had
been indicted. For a time matters looked serious, but as soon as
the witness fell into the hands of Mr. Storrs for cross-examination,
388 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
a totally different complexion was put on the transaction. It
appeared that the sole reason for his request was that Macdonald
suspected that his mails were being tampered with. At the time
he delivered to Macdonald one of these letters, Major Grimes
asked him, — " Macdonald, has Babcock anything to do with this
thing?" Macdonald replied, "Grimes, I don't believe he knows
a bit more about it than you do, and you don't know anything
about it." General Dyer sought to nullify the effect of this by
eliciting the fact that in the same conversation Macdonald dis
claimed having any knowledge of the ring himself, and that Grimes
asked the question "because," as he said, "if Babcock had been
mixed up in it, I was going to drop him right there." Mr.
Storrs brought the examination handsomely round to his client's
advantage by asking, " You have not dropped him, have you ? "
"No," was the witness' reply; "I don't believe him guilty to-day."
Deputy Commissioner Rogers described the efforts made in
1874 and 1875 to investigate frauds in St. Louis, and stated that
in August 1874 he put the arrangements for an expedition into
the hands of Brooks, who was to take Hoag along with him.
The matter was delayed in consequence of the approach of the
fall elections, and again taken up in the latter part of November.
Mr. Rogers then testified as to his receipt of a letter from
Brooks in December, and the visit of Macdonald to his office, as
already narrated. Commissioner Douglass afterwards showed him
a copy of Brooks' letter, which he thought he had destroyed.
The expedition was abandoned because it was intended to be
secret, and the secret had been disclosed by Macdonald. On
cross-examination, Mr. Rogers said that Hoag was then fully
trusted by the Department.
Commissioner Douglass was 'the next witness. His testimony
helped the defence rather than the Government, by whom he
was called. He said that he sent Joyce to California to get him
out of the way of the agents sent to St. Louis, who complained,
of excessive attention on Joyce's part, "wining and dining" them,
so that they could not do any work. Even the virtuous Brashear, it
seemed, complained of Joyce's exuberant hospitality. After the
visit of Macdonald to Washington in December 1874, General
Babcock showed the Commissioner a copy of a letter, and called
his attention to the objectionable expression in it already alluded
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. 389
to. He asked, " Now, what would a sensitive man like Logan
think of this letter?" Shortly after this, the Commissioner met
General Babcock on the sidewalk one Sunday morning, and they
walked down the street together and talked about St. Louis and
Chicago matters. Brooks' expedition had been abandoned then,
and he told Babcock so. Once, early in 1874, Babcock had a
conversation with him about charges against Ford, blackening
his character after his death. He told Babcock there were no
charges against Ford. On another occasion Babcock asked if
any one from his office was going West, because he wanted to
send a bird to a friend. On the 26th of January, 1875, the
Commissioner addressed a letter to the Secretary of the Treasury
with reference to changing thex Supervisors. There had been
rumors of frauds in 1872, and in 1873 and 1874 agents had been
sent to St. Louis, all of whom seemed to fail. Two or three
months before Mr. Richardson went out of office, he talked with
the President and suggested that there should be a change of
officers all over the country, to break up old habits and friend
ships, and get them out of the ruts. President Grant said he
thought it would be a good thing to do, and asked how soon it
could be done. The Commissioner thought it best to wait till
after the fall elections. Shortly after that, Bristow came into
office, and the Commissioner talked the matter over with him.
The result was the sending of his letter to the Secretary, and
an order being made by the Secretary for the transferring of the
Supervisors. After the order was made, the Commissioner and
General Babcock had a conversation at the White House in
regard to it. General Babcock thought the order was bad
policy; that it would bring great pressure upon the President,
and the order would have to be recalled. The order was sus
pended by telegraph on the 4th of March. For two or three
days the question was in doubt, the Secretary going tg the
White House every day at Commissioner Douglass' request in
reference to it. On the morning of the 4th, Secretary Bristow
came to his office, and said the order would have to be recalled.
Mr. Storrs' cross-examination of the Commissioner was subtle
and skillful. How it impressed those who heard it may be gath
ered from the comment of the St. Louis Globe-Democrat, which
gave a verbatim report of the trial day by day. That journal
said:
39O LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
"• It would be difficult to imagine anything prettier in the
shape of forensic display than the skill which Mr. Storrs shows
in sifting the evidence-in-chief of a witness, and in destroying
its effect on the minds of the listeners. His skill is not merely
shown by the terms of the adroit questions he uses as they
appear in print, and no mere reading of the evidence can possi
bly convey an adequate idea of the beauty of the operation. He
speaks not merely with his tongue, but with his eye, the modu
lation of his voice, and almost as effectively with his hands — the
long, slender, white fingers of which are in constant motion, as
by some expressive gesture he appears to compel from the wit
ness just that answer which will be most effective in bringing
out the point he desires to elicit. Moreover, he uses exquisite
tact in suiting his style of questioning to the witness who is
under his hands for the time being. With Everest — a difficult
and stubborn witness— while perfectly polite, he used the keenest
and most powerful sarcasm, making him feel himself an object
of contemptuous ridicule, while forcing him to obedience to his
will. With Major Grimes, on the contrary, his manner was
absolutely courtly, while still bringing the will of the witness
entirely within his control. Again, in the cross-examination of
ex-Commissioner Douglass, his manner was varied to suit the
needs of the moment. Mr. Douglass is a quiet official-minded
personage, willing to tell the truth according to his best recol
lection, but slow of thought and requiring some patience in
manipulation. With him Mr. Storrs was gentle and suave as
could be; but still, under the suavity, the same will-power shone
forth in conspicuous triumph as he resumed his seat, in the
serene consciousness of having demolished the main points which
the prosecution brought out in their examination."
Though the mere reading of the questions and answers will
not convey any vivid idea of the manner of the cross-examina
tion, we cannot forbear selecting a few by way of illustration:
"Q. 'How long a time were you Commissioner of Internal Revenue?
A. From the 8th of August, 1871, to the I5th of May, 1875.'
"Q. 'During the whole of that period of time did not complaints come
up from almost every portion of the country from Revenue officials when
ever detectives were sent into their various districts? A. I frequently had
complaints of that character.'
" Q. ' Did not those complaints depend in a large manner upon the tem-
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. 39 1
perament of the official into whose district the Revenue Agents were sent
— for instance, a sensitive man would complain? A. In a manner.'
"Q.1 Whereas a more sluggish one would not? A. I think that had much
to do with it.'
"Q. 'It was regarded as unusual, and of and by itself a cause of suspi
cion, for a,n official to complain that detectives were sent into his district?
A. Not exactly.'
"Q. That of itself did not create a suspicion — the fact that a complaint
was made ? A. Not of itself. '
" Q. ' Have you not known it to be a fact that some of the very best, or
supposed to be the very best, of the officials of your department have made
these complaints? A. Yes, sir.'
"Q. 'Those complaints, too, as I understood you, were of frequent occur-
ence — came from all portions of the country? A. Quite frequent.'
" Q. 'They were not confined to the locality of St. Louis? A. Not con
fined to St. Louis.'
"Q. 'Was it not frequently the case that trusted officials would inquire
of you and other members of the same department, whether you contem
plated sending detectives into their districts? didn't that occur some times?
A. Not frequently in that shape.'
" Q. 'But it would sometimes occur? A. Yes, sir.'
"Q. 'Well, we'll put a supposititious case. Suppose that Supervisor
Tutton had made that direct inquiry of you, whether you contemplated send
ing detectives into his district, would you have any hesitancy in giving him
an answer? A. Not a bit.'
"Q 'Then the propriety or impropriety of an inquiry of that kind would
depend not upon the inquiry itself, but upon the character of the man that
made it? A. Largely.'
"Q. 'So that if it were made by a man of the established character of
Supervisor Tutton, such an inquiry would excite no suspicion? A. Not in
the least.' "
Commissioner Douglass went on to say that he did not think
General Babcock ever intended to influence him. Mr. Storrs
asked ;
"Q. 'Did you gather, or was there any ground laid for the conjecture in
your mind, from anything he said or did, that he desired in the slightest
degree to interfere with any investigation into supposed frauds on the reve
nue in the city of St. Louis? A. I can answer that by saying that when
ever he spoke to me he always premised that he did not wish to interfere
with the public interests.'
"Mr. Broadhead. 'We object to that question. It is too broad.'
"Mr. Storrs. 'I insist upon the question. This is a conspiracy, and I
think the objection comes with a very ill grace from the counsel for the
Government.'
"The Witness. 'Well, I will tell you—'
"Mr. Broadhead. 'Hold on, Mr. Douglass.'
392 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
"Judge Dillon. 'The substance of the inquiry is correct, but the form in
which it is put is a little objectionable. You have a right to inquire of the
witness as to whether he understood that Babcock was seeking to influence
his official action.*
"Mr. Storrs. 'I will accept that form, and will demand an explicit
answer. Did you understand, from anything that Gen. Babcock said upon
the occasion of that interview, that he desired to influence your action with
reference to the investigation of the supposed frauds in St. Louis? I wish
you would answer that categorically. Answer yes or no.'
"Witness. 'That is a little difficult.'
"Q. 'Did you understand that he attempted to prevent investigation. A.
No, sir; I understood him to be solicitous about the reputation of a man
who was the President's friend and his, and whom he believed to be an
honest man, and whose reputation he was anxious to protect.'
" Q. 'You did not understand that he was seeking to protect Joyce and
Macdonald at all? A. He never said anything at all about them.'
"Q. 'You gathered no such conclusion from anything that he said? A.
No, sir.'
As to the conversation one Sunday about sending detectives on
a Western raid, the Commissioner said that no specific allusion
was made to St. Louis, but it merely referred to a Western trip.
"Q. 'Now, isn't it a fact, Judge Douglass, that upon the occasion of the
exhibition of the letter to you, St. Louis and this district was not mentioned
by General Babcock? A. I did not say it was.1
" Q. 'But isn't it a fact that it was not mentioned? A. I don't remember
that it was mentioned.'
" Q. 'He spoke of General Logan? A. Yes, sir.'
"Q. 'And that General Logan would put an injurious construction upon
it? A. Yes, sir.'
"Q. 'Didn't he call your attention to the phrase, 'satisfactory to our
selves'? A. Yes, sir.'
" Q. 'Do you remember his saying that it looked like addition, division
and silence ? A. I remember that phrase being used about that time in our
State."
"Q. 'Did that originate in Pennsylvania? A. Yes, sir, in Pennsylvania.'
"Mr. Storrs. 'I am glad to know where that came from.'
* "Q. 'Isn't it true that it was considered necessary about that time that
all these Senators should be conciliated? A. My experience has been —
" Q. "In reference to the particular Senator, was it not deemed important?
A. Well, sir — well, sir — that has always been more or less the case in ref
erence to Logan, who is a spirited man.'
"Q. 'On the I3th of December, on Sunday afternoon, you met General
Babcock on the sidewalk? A. Yes, sir, about half an hour after dinner.'
"Q. 'It had not been a prearranged meeting at all? A. No, sir.'
" O. 'This contemplated trip to St. Louis of Hoag and Brooks had been
abandoned? A. That is my recollection.'
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. 393
"Q. 'Because, in fact, Macdonald himself had advised Mr. Rogers that
he knew what was going on? A. Yes.'
"Q. 'That is just what exploded that trip? A. Yes, sir.'
Commissioner Douglass was then asked a few questions as to
his conversation* with General Babcock in relation to the order
transferring the supervisors:
" 'The idea of this transfer, as I understand you, Judge Douglass, was
conceived before Mr. Secretary Bristow came into Office ? A. My first con
versation with the President about it was two or three days before he came
in, during the latter part of Richardson's administration.'
" Q. 'Didn't you have several conversations on that subject? A. Yes,
sir; I thought there would be objection, and I thought we* had better wait
until the elections were over.'
" Q. ' Now, these objections that you were afraid of were from political
men? A. Yes, sir.'
"Q. 'And you apprehended that they would be based upon political
considerations? A. That was my apprehension then.'
" Q. 'Now, will you please state how long after that order had been
determined upon that you had this little quiet conversation with Babcock
upon that subject? A. I think about the time it was known, a couple of
days.'
" Q. 'It was not more than that after you had this little talk with Bab
cock? A. No, sir.'
"Q. 'This conversation was at the White House? A. Yes, sir.'
"Q. 'You were necessarily frequently in and out of the White House,
while you were Commissioner? A. Yes sir, whether he sent me word and
asked me to drop in, or whether I happened to be there on other business,
I don't know.'
"Q. 'Now, you have said something with regard to a statement made to
you by Mr. Rogers. Isn't it a fact that Mr. Rogers, in his interview which
he detailed to you, called upon General Babcock and had the interview,
and didn't Mr. Rogers say so to you? A. I think that is so.'
"Q. 'Then Babcock didn't seek Rogers for the purpose of an interview
on the subject?'
"Mr. Broadhead. 'We object to anything that Mr. Rogers said to the
witness.'
"Mr. Storrs. 'The witness has stated a portion of what Mr. Rogers said,
we would like to know the rest.'
"Judge Dillon. 'If it is the same conversation, it can go on.'
"Col. Dyer. 'I don't remember that he said anything about that.'
"Mr. Storrs. 'My memory is better than yours; I noted it at the time.
It occurred to me that it might be necessary to call Mr. Rogers on that
subject.'
"Judge Dillon. 'Examine him, then, on some other topic.'
"Q. 'This interview between you and Gen. Babcock, as I understand you,
Mr. Douglass, was quite a brief one? A. Yes, sir.'
394 LIFE OF. EMERY A. STORKS.
"Q. 'And the reasons which he assigned you were of a purely political
character? A. That is all.'
"Q. 'Let me ask you quite directly whether the reasons that he sug
gested did not seem to be inspired by considerations of friendship to your
self? A. Yes; I said this morning that he said if the order was withdrawn
by order of the President it would be unpleasant for me.*
" Q. 'He said that a great deal of pressure would be brought to bear upon
the President, and the pressure he alluded to was political pressure? A.
Political pressure.'
"Q. 'Just that thing? A. Exactly.'
"Q. 'And that it would come from men in high political position? A.
Yes, sir.'
" Q. 'And General Babcock told you that the political pressure would be
great, and he apprehended that the President would be compelled to sub
mit? A. Yes, sir.'
" Q. ' Now let me ask you, Judge Douglass, whether or not you had then
some idea of a position on the Court of Claims — whether your friends were
not urging you for that position? A. There was some talk about the elec
tion district of Pennsylvania.'
"Q. 'Now, was it not with reference to that fact — this antagonism of
prominent politicians — that Gen. Babcock talked to you? A. Now that I
remember, I think I got that from Mr. Rogers.'
"Q. 'Now this order was not suspended the next day after this talk? A.
I don't remember the dates — I should think three or four days.'
"Q. 'The order was not suspended by reason of anything that Gen. Bab
cock said to you? A. No; I didn't agree to it. It was suspended because
I was ordered to do it.'
The Commissioner also testified that Joyce was in the habit
of sending letters to officers of the Government, with enclosures
consisting of editorials and the like, which he claimed to have
written.
Deputy Commissioner Rogers was recalled for the Government,
and testified that General Babcock was a warm personal friend
of Commissioner Douglass, and was anxious to bring about his
appointment to a judgeship in the Court of Claims that was then
expected to fall vacant. General Babcock told him that the order
for the transfer of the Supervisors was likely to cause a political
pressure to be brought to bear on the President, which might be
detrimental to the aspirations of Douglass. Mr. Storrs, on cross-
examination, brought out from Mr. Rogers also the fact that
Joyce had been in the habit of sending letters to Government
officials enclosing newspaper editorials purporting to have been
written by himself. In following out his plan of entangling
Government officers in correspondence which he could show to
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. 395
distillers in support of his pretence of official connivance, he
would ask by telegraph whether his letter of such and such a date
had been received, ajid the reply would come by telegraph, —
"Yours, with inclosure, received." It was important, therefore,
that out of the 'mouths of the witnesses for the Government this
fact should be established, in refutation of the theory that these
enclosures were necessarily pecuniary bribes.
Several telegraph clerks and minor Government officials having
been called to identify copies of telegrams supposed to have
passed between Babcock and the conspirators, an afternoon was
passed in hearing argument as to their admissibility. Mr. Storrs
addressed an elaborate argument to the Court to show that none
of the whole series of telegrams, whether from Babcock to Joyce
or from Joyce and Macdonald to Babcock, were admissible as
evidence against the defendant '<It is difficult," said a contemp
orary report, "to decide which to admire most, — the advocate's
absolute command of legal learning bearing on the case, or the
adroitness with which he used the opportunity to argue on a
purely law question to make a regular defence speech to the
jury. Certain it is, that he made the best use of his opportunity
to create an impression on the minds of the jurors favorable to
his client. At each turn in his argument, he wove into his
speech a weft of reasoning that was calculated to show at once
the weakness of the case for the prosecution and the consistency
of the idea of the innocence of his client, even should the tele
grams be admitted as evidence."
This argument is a fine specimen of Mr. Storrs' forensic skill,
and it is to be regretted that it cannot be here quoted in full.
Its nature, however, will be fairly apprehended from the extracts
which we give.
"'The offer of the defendant's telegrams,' he said, 'seems to be in a
large measure based upon the assumption that they are admissible because
he wrote them. But it is perfectly clear, even if that were to be said with
reference to them all. that that of itself furnishes no sufficient reason why
they should be admitted. It is not every oral declaration of a defendant to
a suit either civil or criminal, which is competent as evidence. It is not
every written declaration of a defendant, in a suit either civil or criminal,
which is admissible as evidence against him. The admission, no matter
what shape it takes, and the declaration, no matter what form it assumes,
is not properly admissible in evidence unless the admission or declaration is
relevant to the issue, and relates with that degree of clearness that the
39^ LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
court, before taking the proposition simply, can say that it relates to some
controverted point in the case. A letter addressed by General Babcock to
Joyce, detailing at length the condition of his health, would be clearly incom
petent, although the fact might be indisputable.* A letter addressed by
General Babcock to Joyce, or any other of the conspirators, discussing at
length the subject of a corrupt operation, would be equally and as clearly
inadmissible, notwithstanding he wrote it, because upon the face of the letter
there would probably be this fact that it did not relate to any subject matter in
the trial. I can safely proceed one step further with the proposition. The
paper offered in evidence by the counsel for the prosecution must show
upon its face whether it is relevant or not, because in the presence of to-day
the defendant cannot be rightfully called upon to explain. The explanation
must invariably come from the party who presents the paper, and claims
that it is complete. If the words in the latter possess any occult meaning,
if there is to be attached to them a significance which is not a legitimate
one from the language employed, that occult meaning must first be displayed
by extraneous evidence, and this demand must be supplied by extrinsic
proofs. Therefore, if your Honors please, if, upon the face of any or either
of these dispatches from Babcock, it is a matter of doubt whether they
relate to the combination existing in the city of St. Louis to defraud the
Government of the United States, that doubt must be removed, and the
doubt must be removed by the party offering the paper. For no court
would permit a paper to be offered in evidence by a public prosecutor and
offered to a jury, of doubtful construction, out of which innocence appeared
to be guilt or guilt might be guessed, unless some foundation were previously
made by the party offering the paper. It seems to me that every consider
ation of common justice and individual safety requires a strict and rigid
enforcement of this rule. Here comes into court, if your Honors please, a
defendant whose lips are sealed and whose mouth is closed. There are in
evidence against him telegraphic dispatches ; if they relate to some fact, if
they are of doubtful meaning, the relation of which does not clearly and
sufficiently appear upon the face of the paper, that relation must be estab
lished by the prosecutor — by the party offering the paper before the paper
itself can be competent. Now, how was it with these dispatches ? I propose
to take them all — dispatches which have been referred to by the learned
counsel for the Government in opening this case to the jury — and I do this
upon the assumption that at some time during the progress of this trial they
may be offered in evidence. These dispatches, I may remark here, cannot
be received as evidence, on the ground that they tend to show an intimacy
between Macdonald and defendant. Clearly they are not competent evi
dence on that ground, for intimacy between these parties cannot be shown,
unless it appears at the time this intimacy existed the political and personal
standing of Macdonald and Joyce was the same that their political and per
sonal standing is to-day. The fact that one man who is to-day intimate
with an individual whose general reputation is good, or whose general repu
tation he supposes to be good, can not be introduced as evidence against
him after the lapse of years, when times have changed, when men have
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. 397
changed, and the guilt of one of the parties has suddenly been discovered ;
and, therefore, this is a point to be considered; this is the light in which
these dispatches are to be read. And the great danger in this investigation,
and in investigations of this character, is that the messages will be read not
in that light, or with the surroundings of the time they were sent, but in the
light and with tjie surroundings of the time when they are offered in evidence.
The danger is ( and how grossly and wickedly unjust it would be to the
defendant need not be stated ) — the danger is that all the dispatches to
Joyce and Macdonald will be read, not in the light of the prosperity they
then stood in ; not in the light of the high official position they occupied ;
not in the light of the spotless name they then, so far as the knowledge of
the defendant was concerned, enjoyed, but in the fogs and in the darkness
of to-day. When these dispatches were sent, Joyce and Macdonald were
honored and trusted men, so far as the Departments at Washington had any
knowledge. The trouble is, and the difficulty against which this court or any
other court should sedulously guard this defendant — the trouble is that the
public and the jury will fail to place themselves in this defendant's place ;
and it is for that reason that the relation of these telegrams to some fraudu
lent and corrupt purposes should be a clear and explicit chain, and not
only that, so far as the telegrams from Joyce and Macdonald are concerned
— not only that so far as they were concerned must it be shown that they
relate to some fraudulent combination in which they had a part, but that
this defendant, when he received these dispatches and answered them, knew
that they had such a relation."
Mr. Storrs then reviewed the whole series of dispatches sent
by Babcock, and argued that not one of them on its face had
the slightest relevancy to the charge of complicity with the ring.
As to the first, he said, — " It can have no real significance so far
as any question at issue is concerned. It simply exhibits the
wonderful ingenuity which, in a great public excitement, can suc
ceed in twisting facts out of their true and proper relations, and
placing the defendant upon his trial and subjecting him perhaps
to conviction, because there is in the nature of things not a
probability of guilt, but a remote, distant and conjectural possi
bility that he may not be innocent." Passing by the dispatch
of December 5th, as to which the Court had reserved its decision,
he next came to the "Sylph" dispatch, and insisted that it was
inadmissible because the testimony of both Commissioner Doug
lass and Mr. Rogers showed that General Babcock had no part
in bringing about the abandonment of Brooks and Hoag's expe
dition. If it meant, "I have succeeded in finding out that they
will not go," it conveyed no information, because Macdonald knew
it before Babcock did. He then paid a high compliment to the
LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
ingenuity of the prosecuting counsel, who could attempt to twist
such an innocent looking despatch as the last, — " I have seen
the gentleman, and he seems friendly; he is here looking after
improvement of river," — into evidence that the sender was guilty
of defrauding the Government out of its duties on spirits. "At
this compliment," says a St. Louis paper, "Colonel Broadhead
leaned his bald head backwards, and looked his inverted acknow
ledgements to the speaker over the hill of his venerable eyebrows.
Colonel Dyer turned half round, and bowed a smiling recognition."
Mr. Storrs went on to state that he desired, on this point, to
submit an authority which seemed to be somewhat parallel to
this to the consideration of the Court. Turning to Judge Porter,
that gentleman handed him a volume bound in green, with ele
gant gilt-lettered title, looking like anything in the world rather
than a law book. Mr. Storrs, with imperturbable gravity, said
he was about to cite a case from the 1st Dickens, 118, the
great case of Bardell v. Pickwick.
Mr. Dyer. "What page?"
Mr. Storrs. "Page 118. This was an action for breach of
promise, brought by Mrs. Bardell against Pickwick, and the plain
tiff in that case relied principally upon two letters. The report
gives the argument of the counsel upon the side of the prosecu
tion. Let me read: — 'Garraway's, 12 o'clock. Dear Mrs. B:
Chops and tomato sauce —
At this moment Judge Treat leaned over and whispered some
thing in the ear of Judge Dillon, who said, " I doubt whether
that case will give us much assistance." Closing his book, Mr.
Storrs submitted to the ruling of the Court in his own graceful
style, remarking that he only desired to submit the authority as
it appeared just about parallel with the evidence contained in the
telegram he was discussing. " The audience," says the Globc-
Democrat, " was evidently disappointed of a chance of amuse
ment, and comments were freely made to the effect that this was
the first time that a court had been known to forbid the reading
of competent authorities in hearing arguments on a law point." Mr.
Storrs went on to argue that the prosecution must show not
only that General Babcock was cognizant of the conspiracy, but
of the particular mode stated in the indictment by which it was
to be carried out, before either his despatches to Joyce or
Joyce's to him could be received as evidence against him.
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. 399
"These declarations of Joyce are none the more cogent because they are
written; they are none the more admissible because they are written. I do
not apprehend that these declarations, were they offered in evidence, would
in the present stage of this case be received, and the only theory by which
declarations of this character are received at all is that they are made to
the party to the record. If the declaration is an oral one, the parties stand
ing face to face, while the opportunity of denial or repudiation is at hand,
then there is some force and effect to be given to the oral communication,
because the courts have said that the silence of the party to whom the oral
communication is addressed may be construed into an acquiescence. But
the wisdom of the law has already done away with any such presumption
as that where the communication is a written one, and made either by letter
or by telegram. And hence it is that an unanswered letter ranks no higher
in the scale of proof against the party to whom the letter is addressed than
the trivial deduction made by an alleged conspirator to a third person, and
not in the presence or hearing of the party against whom that declaration is
offered. That distinction, your Honor, runs through all the books ; it is
found everywhere; it is one which exists of a very necessity. The only
reason that the declaration of a party when made to a defendant is admis
sible, is because the poison and the antidote are both together. It is because
if the assertion be false, it would be at once controverted and denied. It
is because all our ambiguities about it may be explained, and explained in
the hearing of those who are present, and who would report it. The admis-
sibility of that kind of declaration rests upon this idea. Its foundation is a
philosophical one, perhaps I may say a metaphysical one. It is derivable
from the nature of man, from the conception which we have of him, that
where crime is charged, if not guilty, he will deny it: that where complicity
or crime is charged, if innocent, he will deny it ; that, at all events, it is
the very nature of man, where he is placed in a false position by the spoken
declarations of others, then and there to right his position. But for these
reasons, if the court please, it fades into thin air in the case of telegraphic
communications or by letters. The possibility of complete instantaneous
repudiation or denial does not exist ; the necessity for it does not exist ;
there is no necessity for personal intercourse or explanation. And hence it
is again revolving in this circle, and founded upon these general principles;
an unanswered letter is no proof, it tends to prove nothing. In reference
to telegrams from Joyce to Babcock we won't stop to discuss them in detail.
It will be found, upon an inspection of them, that they bear no immediate
relation to the subject matter involved in this trial; in the next place, that
they are unanswered ; and, with regard to the dispatches of the 3d and the
5th, no sufficient proof has been made either that they were sent or received
by third parties. With that I submit that these dispatches, so far as they
have been offered, should be excluded from the consideration of the jury."
Judge Porter's argument on the same side was a scholarly
exposition of the law and citation of authorities. He held the
Government to strict proof that Babcock himself wrote the tele-
4OO LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
grams put in evidence, and as to Joyce's telegrams to him,
several of which were never answered, he contended that it would
be inaugurating a new rule to allow a party to make evidence
against another by simply writing to him, thus casting upon that
other the onus of the response. During Judge Porter's address,
he read the first telegram from Babcock to Joyce in reference to*
the appointment of Ford's successor, when Colonel Broadhead
interrupted him, and read it in such a way as to suggest a startling
interpretation of its meaning. The ingenuity of the prosecuting
counsel, and their determination to secure the conviction of General
Babcock by any kind of artifice, were so pointedly exhibited here
as to create a feeling rather of sympathy with the defendant,
against whom the Government officers were straining evidence
in so unworthy a way. The report is worth reading :
"'See that Ford's bondsmen recommend you.' That is all. He under
stands Joyce as being a candidate for that position, and he says that if he
wishes that position he should have the recommendation of Ford's bonds
men.'
"Colonel Broadhead. 'Let me read that, 'See that Ford's bondsmen recom
mend you."
"Mr. Storrs. 'Where is the accentuation in that telegram?"
"Judge Krum. 'We would be pleased if the gentleman would show us
the underscoring.'
"Judge Porter. 'Precisely that. In a criminal case the officer represent
ing the Government asks that you convict a man on an accent, when it
is a generally recognized principle of law that where two constructions are
possible, the innocent one must be accepted. Not only the innocent con
struction, but the most reasonable is that which the other reading gives it.
But suppose it is read as Col. Broadhead ingeniously suggests, does that
prove any more than the other that Babcock had any evil purpose in
thus advancing a man whom he regarded, as others did, as honest and
as entitled to advancement ? ' '
The object of the prosecution, in suggesting this ingenious
reading of the telegram, was to make the jury believe that Gen
eral Babcock had some special private reason for desiring Joyce
to be appointed to the vacant Collectorship. The deposition of
the President, however, disposed of that idea, and the artifice of
the Government counsel only recoiled upon themselves.
Judge Dillon overruled the objections to the dispatches on the
ground that their relevancy was a question for the jury to deter
mine under advice from the Court, and the fact that some of
them were unanswered did not constitute alone a sufficient ground
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. 4<DI
for excluding them, but they must be viewed in connection with
all the circumstances of the case. As to the despatches between
Macdonald, and Joyce, these were admitted as statements or acts
of the conspirators among themselves, in furtherance of the con
spiracy ; "but as to the defendant," said Judge Dillon, "they go
for naught, unless he is shown by other evidence to be connected
with the conspiracy."
The telegrams were then read in evidence, and they showed
very clearly the methods of Joyce and Macdonald's operations,
and their way of sending telegrams to officials in Washington
which would call out replies such as they wanted to show to the
distillers for their encouragement Joyce, for instance, sent a
telegram to General Babcock, — "Have you talked with D.? Are
things right? How?" — to which he got no answer, but the
distillers to whom he showed it before sending it were doubtless
impressed by the familiarity of Joyce's style, and that was enough.
While Macdonald was in Washington in December 1874, he
telegraphed Joyce, — "Had a long ride with the President this
afternoon. B. and H. are here. You will hear from me to-mor
row." By showing this to the distillers, Joyce could create an
impression on their minds that the President of the United States
was either advised of or co-operated with them in their scheme
of fraud. He could take that telegram and call their attention to
the fact that Macdonald was hobnobbing with the President, and
so induce them to think that through Macdonald's influence they
would be safe from prosecution. The next day, after he had his
talk with Deputy Commissioner Rogers, and learned that Brooks
and Hoag were not to be sent to St. Louis, Macdonald exultingly
telegraphed to Joyce, — "Dead dog; goose hangs altitudilum ; the
sun shines." This was sent on the 8th of December, five days
before Babcock's "Sylph" dispatch, in which it was claimed by
the Government that General Babcock informed the ring of the
abandonment of the expedition.
An important ruling was made by Judge Dillon just after the
admission of these telegrams, which still further narrowed the
volume of evidence for the Government, and relieved the defence
of some trouble. While Mr. Barton was testifying, he was asked
by General Dyer to state a conversation between himself and
Joyce as to the purpose to which the $5,000 that he and Fraser
26
4O2 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
raised in April 1875 was to De applied. Mr. Storrs at once rose
and said:
" 'Now, if they propose to reach the defendant by this conversation, we
object.'
"Mr. Dyer. 'Well, we propose to do so.'
"Judge Dillon. ' Do you seek to show by this evidence declarations of
Joyce in connection with the transaction to implicate the defendant?'
"Mr. Dyer. 'Yes, sir.'
" Mr. Broadhead. ' Yes, sir ; upon the principles of the ruling in the Mc-
Kee case in regard to Leavenworth's declarations. They are the same pre
cisely ; I do not see any difference — subject to your ruling.'
"Judge Dillon. 'Yes, sir. The difference would be this, with regard to
them ; In the McKee case, we required the defendant's connection with the
conspiracy to be established before we received the declarations.'
"Mr. Storrs. 'An important difference.1'
Judge Dillon promptly ruled upon the question, excluding the
declarations of Joyce in grave, dignified, and significant language.
He said :
"Now, the object of this testimony, as it seems to both of us, is not for
the legitimate purpose of showing the nature of this conspiracy, but for the
purpose, by indirection, to do what the law will not permit directly to be
done ; namely, to show the defendant's connection with the conspiracy. Now
the court has a discretion in such cases to admit such testimony, or testi
mony of this character, on the assumption that it may finally be shown that
the defendant was connected with the conspiracy, and, therefore the state
ments of one of the conspirators with another in the execution or fur
therance of the scheme would be competent. But it is true that the regular
course is, and, as the books say, the advisable course is in cases of this
kind to require that connection to be first established. And if there ever
was a case where that should be done, it is a case of this character. The char
acter of this man Joyce, the obvious purpose which he seems to have
manifested in this case — his forcing the distillers to make illicit
whisky, the bold and defiant character of his operations here, makes
it extremely dangerous to receive this kind of testimony. I don't know what
lie might undertake to say. He might have undertaken to implicate the
judicial officers of the Government, and I would tremble for the reputation
of the court if it was to be admitted upon the mere declaration of this man
in carrying out this scheme ; and we think the testimony as to his mere
declarations ought not to be received."
The last witness called for the Government was the revenue
agent Brooks; and as to this gentleman was due the credit of
detecting and exposing the St. Louis frauds, — as he was, like
Abdiel,
"Alone among the faithless, faithful found," —
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. 403
his testimony carried great weight. The St. Louis Globe-Demo
crat, in a graphic description of his appearance on the witness
stand, said: "Mr. Brooks was decidedly the best witness that
has been examined during the progress of the case. He pos
sesses remarkable accuracy of memory, and answered the ques
tions addressed him in clear, full tones that were audible and
distinct in the furthest recesses of the court-room. His features,
while delivering his testimony, betrayed not the slightest evidence
of emotion, except that a smile was once or twice forced from
him in cross-examination. Aside from this, his look was one of
continued introspection, and the cautious deliberation with which
he framed his answers and the exceeding exactitude of his lan
guage showed clearly the effort he was making to state, and
only state, precisely what he knew, of his own personal knowledge."
Mr. Brooks testified that in August 1874 the Commissioner
ordered him to Washington to consult as to the condition of dis
tilleries in the West, and what means should be taken to detect
the frauds that were being committed there. The result was
that the charge of the expedition was put into his hands, and
he recommended that Hoag should co-operate with him. The
trip was put off on account of the elections till December, when,
being engaged in Philadelphia on legal business for the Govern
ment, Hoag came and saw him there. On the I4th of Decem
ber he received a letter from Deputy Commissioner Rogers,
informing him that the raid \vas off.
In the cross-examination of this witness Mr. Storrs again, and
more distinctly than before, foreshadowed the main feature that the
defence relied on to prove that the secret information furnished
from time to time to the conspirators came from Hoag, and not
from General Babcock. Speaking of the raid on the distilleries
in New Orleans, the witness gave evidence which left no shadow
of doubt that Hoag had remained purposely behind in Cincinnati
to get an opportunity to send information by wire to the distil
lers that Government officers were on their track ; and when
Brooks arrived in New Orleans he found the law-breakers busy
running off the evidences of their guilt. The witness further
stated that the seizures were hastened by the knowledge he had
acquired of this fact after his arrival in New Orleans, and that
they were made without waiting for the arrival of his coadjutor,
404 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
Hoag. At the time of the visit to St. Louis of Brooks and Hoag
in May, 1874, the witness stated that Hoag again failed to make
connections on time, and after the latter did come, he, Brooks,
had felt compelled to warn him against his too frequent habit
of associating at night with parties who at that time were
suspected by the Government.
It is necessary, in order to give an adequate idea of Mr.
Storrs' cross-examination of this important witness, to make some
extracts from the verbatim report:
"Mr. Storrs: 'Mr. Brooks, in one way and another you have been con
nected with the Revenue or Secret Service for many years, have you not?
A. For eleven years.'
"Q. 'You have had a very large experience in this business, haven't you?
A. Somewhat extensive.'
"O. 'And your efforts for the detection of frauds and the punishment of
the offenders have been attended with a great measure of success as com
pared with other officials? A. I think a large measure of success.'
"Q. 'Perhaps it might seem a little vain in you to volunteer a statement,
but, notwithstanding that, I will ask you whether you don't consider your
self a pretty good judge of men? A. No, sir.'
"Q. 'Is the fact that you were deceived by Hoag one reason why you
have lost your confidence in yourself in that direction? A. It is, sir.'
" Q. 'Up to the time that Hoag so fearfully deceived you didn't you
think you were a pretty good judge of men? A. I am afraid I did.' [Laugh-
ten]
" O. ' But that ambition, that vanity, now is crushed to earth in the devel
opment of Hoag's duplicity? A. Not exactly.'
"Q. 'It is smothered a good deal? A. It is a little crowded.'
"Q, 'When did you first make the acquaintance of John T. Hoag? A.
I made his acquaintance early in April, 1874; he was recommended to me
by the Commissioner.'
"Q. 'He was recommended to you by the Commissioner of Internal
Revenue ? A. He was, and I objected to association with him for some
time.'
"Q. 'Were your objections based on any previous knowledge, or were
they excited in your mind from an inspection of the man? A. Neither.'
"Q. 'Why, then, did you object to being associated with him? A
Because I had not proved him.'
"Q. 'And you didn't want to be associated with any man that you had
not proved? A. No, sir.'
"Q. 'When did you first begin to prove him? A. Well, I don't know how
to answer that. Do you ask when I discovered —
"Q. 'I don't want to know what you first discovered. What was your
first experience with him in an official way? A. I had positively no experi
ence with him in an official way.'
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. 405
"Q. 'What I mean is, what trip did you first become associated with
him in? A. The trip to New Orleans.'
"Q. 'Looking back on the New Orleans trip now, with your present
lights, did you see anything in the conduct of Hoag that was suspicious?
A. Yes, sir — that is, no ; let me recall that answer. Only by common report
I am judging now, not by experience.'
"Q. 'Was he on hand promptly at New Orleans? A. He was not.'
"Q. 'W7hy wasn't he? A. I don't know, sir; I attributed it to the
best motives. '
"Q. 'What reason did he assign? A. He couldn't get his man in Cin
cinnati.'
41 Q. 'He was delayed in Cincinnati watching for his man? A. Yes, sir.'
"Q. 'When did Hoag get to New Orleans? A. Two or three days after
the raid had been made.' '
Mr. Brooks stated that on his arrival in New Orleans he
found that the distillers there had been making illicit whisky,
and running it off into flatboats. He discovered indications that
in some mysterious way the distillers had received information
of his coming. Hoag went with him from New Orleans to St.
Louis, and his conduct while in St. Louis excited Brooks' suspi
cion.
"Q. 'Hoag was behind, at New Orleans? How long after the seizures
did Hoag get there? A. About two days.'
" Q. 'Was that your first experience with him? A. It was.'
" Q. ' Please tell the jury where was your next? A. In St. Louis.'
"Q. 'The Be vis & Fraser matter? A. Yes, sir.'
"Q. 'I will ask you the general question, whether in visiting these vari
ous places with Hoag, you ever observed anything in his conduct that
excited your suspicion? A. Not then — yes — I did in this city — not excite
my suspicion, but I thought his conduct was to be deprecated.'
"Q. 'Will you please to state what that conduct was that you thought
was to be deprecated? A. Well, he would associate so much with Mr.
Fitzroy, and others in this city, at night, going around with them. I warned
him then to be careful of his associations.'
" Q. 'When was it that you visited here for the purpose of investigating
Bevis and Fraser's condition? A. On May 4.'
"Q. ' 1874? A. 1874.'
" Q. 'Then, as I understand you, Hoag was an industrious searcher
after truth with you during the day, and went around with Fitzroy in the
night. A. He went out with them ; he spent his evenings with them.'
" Q. ' Did you look upon that sort of mixture of operations as suspicious in
its character? A. No, sir; I protested; I told him he should be careful of
his associations, not become too familiar.'
"Q. 'With Fitzroy? A. Not Fitzroy especially; I had probably Fitzroy
in my mind, but I assumed that he was associating with others besides Fitz
roy.'
4O6 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
"Q. 'You of course, had not the slightest idea that Hoag was giving
information? A. Not at all.'
" Q. 'You had not the slightest idea that he was communicating with
Bingham or any of the other distillers? A. No, sir.''
Hoag had the same avenues of information that he had, and
had the- full confidence of the Department.
Several telegrams from Avery to Joyce having been put in
evidence, showing one source at least from which the St. Louis
ring got their information from Washington, the case for the
Government was closed.
II.
THE DEFENSE.
OPENING SPEECH OF EX-ATTORNEY-GENERAL WILLIAMS — WHAT JOYCE'S "MUM"
DISPATCH MEANT — MR. WILLIAMS' PERSONAL EXPERIENCE OF THE CARES OF
OFFICE — SPLENDID ARRAY OF WITNESSES TO GENERAL BABCOCK'S CHARAC
TER — TESTIMONY OF SUPERVISOR TUTTON — WHY THE ORDER TRANSFERRING
THE SUPERVISORS WAS REVOKED — DISINGENUOUS COURSE OF THE PROSECU
TION—THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY WALKS INTO A TRAP OF HIS OWN CONSTRUC
TION — SECRETARY BRISTOW DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REVOCATION
OF THE ORDER — JOYCE'S CORRESPONDENCE — REVENUE AGENT HOAG THE
SOURCE OF THE RING'S INFORMATION — DEPOSITION OF THE PRESIDENT —
— JUDGE PORTER'S MOTION FOR A DIRECTION TO ACQUIT OVERRULED —
COLONEL BROADHEAD'S ARGUMENT FOR THE PROSECUTION — THE "SYLPH"
TELEGRAM — CLOSING ARGUMENT OF MR. STORRS FOR THE DEFENSE — JUDGE
PORTER FOLLOWS— GENERAL DYER'S REPLY— JUDGE DILLON'S CHARGE TO
THE JURY.
ON the eighth day of the trial, Attorney-General Williams
opened the case for the defence. He admitted at the
outset that for four years the St. Louis whisky ring had been
plundering the Government, and that Macdonald and Joyce, while
unsuspected, held high social position, and corresponded with
influential Government officials. Their social acquaintances, how
ever, were not necessarily their confederates in crime. All that
the Government had been able to prove against General Babcock
amounted merely to a suspicion, derived from the wording of
some telegrams; and such a suspicion General Babcock's whole
career and character went to disprove. Mr. Williams then reminded
the jury that party strife in the State of Missouri had been
characterized by unnecessary harshness and bitterness, owing to
the course taken by Carl Schurz, Gratz Brown, and their adher
ents; and that Macdonald and Joyce had made themselves con
spicuous as champions of the administration and friends of the
407
408 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
President, and took every opportunity to impress on President
Grant, through correspondence with General Babcock, the magni
tude and value of their services. The reading of Joyce's letters
to General Babcock by Mr. Williams produced a striking effect
in the court-room. They showed that at the time this corres
pondence was commenced by Joyce, he was comparatively a
stranger to General Babcock, and had to recall to the mind of
the latter the fact that Orville Grant, a brother of the President,
once introduced them to each other. They enclosed editorials,
clipped from newspapers, which Joyce claimed to have written in
support of the administration and against Schurz and Brown, and
which could easily have induced General Babcock to respond,
"with thanks for the enclosure." One letter clearly showed the
true explanation of the telegram, "See the dispatch sent to the
President; we mean it; mum." The dispatch referred to was that
sent by the bondsmen of Ford recommending Maguire, with
which Joyce had nothing whatever to do; and the words, "we
mean it," were written to salve over Joyce's mortified self-impor
tance. All the mysterious significance was taken out of the
word "mum," when it became apparent to the jury that Joyce
had been a candidate and had been defeated, and did not want
to have it known by the other politicians in St. Louis, and par
ticularly by Maguire, that he had been Maguire's competitor for
the office. He said in this letter:
"Dear General: I heard from you in due course in regard to the Collect-
orship, and at once went to see the bondsmen, but I found they were fixed
upon the man they had recommended, and not being in a position to induce
them to act in my behalf, telegraphed as I have already done. Of course
telegrams to parties here revolving about the Globe office got out among
particular friends, and therefore newspaper hawks got just enough informa
tion to spread themselves and tell more than anybody else can."
This letter plainly showed what Joyce meant by the word
"mum," and that it indicated nothing more than the vulgar and
familiar style which he adopted in all his communications. The
correspondence about Ford's successor was shown to be of the
most innocent official character, and its reading produced a
marked sensation. Joyce knewr that the President was an old
and intimate friend of Collector Ford, and he adroitly availed
himself of that circumstance to pretend a great solicitude for
Ford's memory, when in fact all he wanted was that revenue
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. 409
agents, — "scandal hounds," as he termed them, — should not be
sent to St. Louis during his absence in San Francisco. A start
ling flood of light was thrown on this telegram by Mr. Williams'
reading of Babcock's letter in reply: — "I have seen D., and he
assures me.no mention has ever been made of Ford's name . . .
I don't know your instructions on trip to San Francisco; I think,
though, it is because D. trusts you to do important work."
General Babcock had, in compliance with Joyce's request, had
an interview with Commissioner Douglass about Ford, as already
explained by the Commissioner's testimony, and this letter was
the answer. The vindication of General Babcock, so far as these
telegrams of Joyce were concerned, was made complete and sat
isfactory by the production of the accompanying correspondence.
The impression made by these letters is shown by the comment
of the Globe-Democrat on their production:
"In this respect the counsel for the defense has shown a vast amount of
finesse. These letters, so vital to the case, were never hinted at before they
were produced in court, and their production at this critical stage shows
beyond a peradventure that the counsel for the prosecution have been more
anxious to find evidence in support of a preconceived theory than to con
duct a fair investigation into the acts of an officer whose heedless good
nature had led him into an innocent correspondence with fellow officials
which has since placed him in so much peril."
Mr. Williams showed that General Babcock, instead of being a
member, was in fact a victim of the conspiracy ; that by the use
of his name, and by drawing him adroitly into correspondence,
innocent enough so far as he was concerned, Joyce and Mac-
donald were able to keep up the idea with the distillers and rec
tifiers in St. Louis that they were safe, because they were under
the protection of the White House. They simply abused the
generous confidence and friendship of General Babcock, who
down to the date of the seizures had no idea that they were even
suspected by the Revenue Department. The conduct of Joyce in
regard to the two envelopes, and the two $500 bills, as detailed
by Everest, was severely commented upon as another example of
Joyce's unscrupulous use of General Babcock's name to carry on
his pretence to the distillers that Babcock was in the ring.
"Joyce takes the bills," said Mr. Williams, "in the presence of Everest,
and puts them, or pretends to put them, in two envelopes, already directed
and spread out on the desk of Joyce. Joyce hands them to Everest, and
tells him to go and put them in a certain post-office box, while he stands
4IO LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
at the window and watches him. Why all this parade over this act, which,
if intended to be criminal, would have been concealed ? You can readily
see, gentlemen, that— as the distillers and rectifiers were a little restive, and
doubtful as to whether or not they were safe — all this parade was made by
Joyce to impress upon the mind of Everest the fact that Avery and Babcock
were receiving money from the Ring, so that he could go to. the rectifiers
and distillers and say to them, 'Be quiet; all is right ; Babcock and Avery
are getting our money, and they will see that we are not disturbed.' Do
you believe, gentlemen of the jury, that Joyce sent a dollar in these letters?
You will be satisfied before this case closes, if you are not already satisfied,
that this was one of the tricks of Joyce, to keep up the delusion here that
others in Washington were implicated in this conspiracy ; and this damnable
trick of a desperate and unprincipled villain — a fact of which Gen. Babcock
was as ignorant as a new-born babe— is brought in here as evidence of his
guilt. Look, again, at that transaction of #10,000 they raised. Five thous
and was paid to Joyce, and $5,000 to Macdonald. in April, 1875. Macdon-
ald pretended that it was money to prevent seizures, and it was obtained
upon a promise that if the seizures were made the money should be returned.
But they were made, and there wasn't a cent returned. Joyce and Macdon
ald saw that this conspiracy was tottering to its fall ; that it was on its last
legs ; that the opportunity for making more money out of it was rapidly
expiring ; and so, under this pretext they black-mailed the distillers and rec
tifiers here out of $10,000. Macdonald pretended at one time that it was to
pay somebody in Washington, as a remuneration for services rendered
them ; and at another time, that it was to prevent seizure. But I will not
insult your intelligence by supposing that you have any doubt that every
dollar of that money went into the pockets of Joyce and Macdonald."
Not a particle of evidence had been offered to show any agree
ment or understanding between Babcock and the men in St. Louis.
All that was left in a region of conjecture and doubt. Mr.
Williams closed by saying:
" I cannot express, gentlemen of the jury, all I feel in this case. I have
been associated in public life with General Babcock for several years, and
I know and can appreciate the difficulties and responsibilities of his position.
"And I know from bitter experience how easy it is for evil-disposed per
sons, who pervert an act performed, perhaps without much care or thought,
in the hurry of business, and amid the multiplicity of duties, an act inno
cent in itself, into evidence of a wrong purpose, or a disposition to violate
the law.
"I have, gentlemen, exhibited to you, not in detail, but as briefly as I
could, the weakness of this prosecution, and the points upon which we
depend for our defense. I do not ask sympathy or favor for the defendant,
but I do ask an enlightened and righteous judgment from you. President
Grant has said 'let no guilty man escape,' and I approve of that policy.
"But it would be a sad and strange spectacle to see scores of self-con
victed felons walking the streets as free as the encasing air, enjoying life
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. 411
and the fruits of their years of robbery, while, by their testimony, and a few
facts offered to give it decency and strength, Gen. Babcock is dragged from
his home, his family, his friends and his country, and thrust into the jaws
of a Penitentiary. Let justice, however, be done, though the heavens fall.
"Show him no favor, unwarranted by law, on account of his past career
or recent position. But in doing that I doubt not that you will come from
your final consideration over this case with beautiful feet to bring glad
tidings to family and friends of his full deliverance from this prosecution."
Seldom in a criminal trial have witnesses to character been
called on the part of the defendant of such high public station
and conceded national reputation as were called on behalf of
General Babcock. First came General Humphreys, Chief of the
Engineer Department of the United States army, a silver-haired
veteran whose erect martial bearing and honest face reminded
one of that Colonel Newcome with whose character Thackeray
has made us all so familiar. He spoke of General Babcock's
high standing in the army, and said that as Superintendent of
Public Buildings and Grounds at Washington, General Babcock
had charge of an expenditure of over $400,000 annually, and had
performed his duties admirably. The first Auditor of the Treasury,
Mr. Mahon, testified that the accounts of General Babcock's
annual disbursements balanced to a cent. Mr. Berrett, Mayor
of Washington from 1858 to 1 86 1, a white haired gentleman of
magnificent appearance, who was at this time Police Commissioner
for the District of Columbia, said that General Babcock's reputa
tion as a gentleman was unexceptionable, and his integrity
unquestioned. The jury listened with interest to Mr. Berrett
when he said, " I have been a life-long Democrat, and have never
been affiliated with the party of which General Babcock is a
member." He was, in fact, a prisoner in Fort Lafayette for some
months in 1861, on account of his Southern sympathies. General
N. P. Banks of Massachusetts gave emphatic testimony to the
high character of the defendant as a man, a soldier, and a citizen.
He had known General Babcock from the time he served on his
staff in the Army of the Potomac, and never heard a word said
to his detriment until this trial. The General of the Army of
the United States, William T. Sherman, said he first knew General
Babcock as the bearer to him of dispatches from General Grant
at Savannah. From that time on he had known him intimately,
and had never heard his reputation questioned until the proceed-
412 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
ings in this case. The old veteran, General Harney, the ex-Sec
retary of the Navy, Mr. Borie, General Simpson, General Sturgis,
General Fullerton, and Captain Babbitt, all testified to their com
plete belief in Babcock's integrity, and gave him a handsome
send-off in the way of character.
A new light was thrown upon the revocation by President
Grant of the order transferring the Supervisors, when Mr. Alex
ander P. Tutton, supervisor of the district embracing the States
of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland and Delaware, and the
District of Columbia, was put upon the stand for the defence.
The counsel for the prosecution struggled zealously to exclude
the vital portions of Mr. Tutton's testimony, but unsuccessfully,
and at last by their own indiscretion enabled Mr. Storrs to get
it all in. Mr. Tutton testified that in January 1875 an order was
made transferring him from Philadelphia to St. Louis, and he
went to Washington and had an interview with Commissioner
Douglass in reference to it on the 3d of February. The District
Attorney objected to the witness stating his conversation with
the Commissioner. " We have never insisted," he said, " and
do not now insist, that there is any evidence tending to show
that General Babcock said anything to the President in reference
to the suspension of the order. This is a conversation with an
outside party, and therefore inadmissible." Yet General Dyer
had distinctly charged General Babcock, in his opening speech,
with procuring the revocation of the order. He now admitted
that there was no evidence to maintain the charge, but wanted
to prevent the defence from showing just how the revocation of
the order carne about. The reason for this disingenuous course,
this anxiety to suppress the truth, was apparent the moment the
testimony was admitted. Judge Dillon, in overruling the objec
tion, said:
"We think that you could have no other purpose in the introduction
of the testimony of Mr. Douglass. The jury may infer that there was
improper motive on the part of Babcock in connection with that order.
And if so, clearly, on the clearest principles, they ought to be entitled
to remove that impression if they can do so."
Mr. Tutton went on to say that after his interview with the
Commissioner, he next called upon the Secretary of the Treasury,
and had a conversation with him in reference to the order.
General Dyer again objected, more nervously than before, to the dis-
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. 413
closure of Tutton's conversation with Secretary Bristow. Judge Dil
lon's ruling was of a nature to give some comfort to the Dis
trict Attorney, and shut out the awkward facts he feared to have
disclosed, but in a short time General Dyer threw away all the
advantage he had gained. Judge Dillon said:
"It does not seem to be disclaimed here that the government will
maintain upon the evidence of Douglass and the other witnesses that
the defendant was improperly concerned in the revocation of the order
for the transfer of the Supervisors. That must have been the purpose of
that testimony, that order being a step designed by the Commissioner in
order to ascertain the frauds to be ferreted out. Now we think it is
competent for the defendant here to show the history of the revocation
of that order to the jury. \\e don't think it material for the witness to
go into a conversation with the Secretary of the Treasury-, but if the
witness called upon the Secretary in reference to this order, and was by the
Secretary 'referred to the President, that fact may be stated."
Mr. Tutton said that after his conversation with the Secretary,
Mr. Bristow directed him to call upon the President, and state
to him substantially what he had stated to the Secretary. He
went directly to the Presidential mansion, and stated to President
Grant his objections to the order, as he had already done to the
Commissioner and Secretary Bristow. The President said that it
was thought that a great deal of fraud had been perpetrated in
St. Louis and Chicago and other points, and this order had been
issued with the hope that it might enable the Government to
detect the frauds; that while he himself did not think the officers
in St. Louis were involved in the frauds or had anything to do
with them, he did think, from what he had heard, that frauds
were being committed; that considerable political influence had
already been brought to bear upon him to revoke the order, but
he felt that it was necessary to carry it out, in order to put a
stop to the alleged frauds on the Government. Mr. Tutton then
explained to the President why he thought the order would not
effect the object for which it was made. Its publication had
already given notice to the distillers to put them on their guard,
and the new officers would therefore find no traces of past frauds.
While it might result in preventing fraud for the future, it would
fail so far as the detection of past frauds and the punishment of
those engaged in them was concerned. As he had already said
to Secretary Bristow, he again said||i the President, that in his
opinion a better plan would be to send out some trustworthy
4H LIFE OF EMERY A. STORRS.
man who knew all about the distilleries, what they could do
legally, and what it was unlawful for them to do, and let him
visit them unawares and find out what they were doing before
they had time to conceal the evidence.
"I said to him that I had suggested, to the Secretary of the Treasury,
Revenue Agent Brooks as the very best person that I knew of to have
charge of that business — most likely to get down to what was actually tak
ing place at these points; that Brooks had been 'on duty with me for five
or six years ; that he was not only competent, but he was honest, was
shrewd, and I was satisfied that if sent out there without anybody knowing,
or the parties getting any information of his coming, I believed he would be
able to detect the frauds that were being committed, if such were the case.
Now, that is the substance of what took place, though the interview was a
lengthy one, and I can't say that I recollect everything that was uttered.
"Q. 'You will state, if you please, what the President said? A. The
President, after listening to my statement in regard to the matter, said that
the more he thought about this thing, and the more information he had
about it, the better he became satisfied that this arrangement would not
accomplish what they had expected it would accomplish, and that he would
order the revocation of it that day.' '
The result of this conversation was that President Grant ordered
the suspension of the order. Mr. Tutton said, on cross-examina
tion, that he had no conversation with General Babcock on the
subject. The District Attorney then put some questions tending
to draw out part of Mr. Tutton's conversation with Secretary
Bristow, — the very conversation to which he had objected while
Mr. Storrs had the witness under examination in chief. The
scene that followed is very ably described in the Globe-Democrafs
report :
" Mr. Tutton's testimony was exceedingly important, and amounted, indeed
to a turning point in the trial. He showed clearly that the famous order of
the President, suspending .the order of Commissioner Douglass for the trans
fer of Supervisors, was brought about solely through his own intervention.
And during the examination and cross-examination a curious scene occurred,
wherein it was shown how easy it is, sometimes, for a really shrewd lawyer
to walk deliberately into a trap of his own construction. The witness was
asked by Mr. Storrs for the defense, to state the substance of a conversation
he had had with Secretary Bristow, and the counsel for the Government
objecting, the 'court very properly ruled out the question. Subsequently, on
cross-examination, Colonel Dyer led the witness up to relate some of the
details of this very conversation^hat had been ruled out on his own objec
tion. Every one expected thei^nsel for the other side to jump up with
a counter objection, and one of^iem did make a move to do so. But Mr.
Storrs, whose management of the' case throughout has been beyond all praise,
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. 415
with a quiet gesture restrained his impatient associate, and the evidence was
given unchallenged. As this line of cross-examination was going on, how
ever, Judge Dillon, interposed with a remark to the effect that he had
already ruled out this evidence on the objection of the prosecution. Storrs
smiled a quiet smile of triumph, while Dyer looked absolutely scared when
it dawned upon him what he had done. Storrs then rose quietly, and insisted
that, as the counsel for the other side had introduced this matter, his side
had a right to pursue the inquiry. Even Judge Treat smiled at the adroit
ness of the learned counsel, and the court, after brief debate, consented to
admit the testimony to a limited extent. This was all that Storrs wanted,
and he immediately proceeded to get in testimony to the effect that Secre
tary Bristow was a willing and consenting party to the suspension of the
order to transfer the Supervisors, and that this consent had led him to sug
gest to Mr. Tutton that he should lay his arguments to that end before
the President. Said a listening attorney to the reporter of this paper :
' If Secretary Bristow knew of this suspension before it was ordered, and
if that suspension and subsequent revocation were brought about with his
express consent, it seems that his motives in permitting General Babcock,
and even General Grant, to be questioned in this matter, are somewhat
queer. If Babcock is guilty, then the officers who signed the order of sus
pension must be guilty.' '
It was now clear to the jury, and to the country at large, why
General Dyer was so anxious to exclude this testimony. There
was no longer any shadow of doubt that Secretary Bristow was
directly responsible for the revocation of the order ; that it was
done, not on account of anything that General Babcock did or
said, — for in fact he had nothing to do with it, — but on the
advice of Supervisor Tutton, approved by Secretary Bristow. The
counsel for the Government should have known this ; and had it
been known to them, it can scarcely be supposed that they would
have instituted the proceedings against General Babcock. There
are only two possible explanations of the District Attorney's
course of action. Either he knew what Secretary Bristow had.
done, and yet proceeded against Babcock with the deliberate pur
pose of casting a slur upon the President and his private secre
tary to serve Mr. Bristow's political ambition, or he was ignorant
of the facts, and the responsibility for this prosecution must rest
upon Secretary Bristow himself. In whatever way the case is
viewed, it will be hard to find a scruple of palliation for this
wanton arraignment of one of the most honorable and distin
guished citizens of the United States.
Several confidential letters from Deputy Commissioner Rogers
41 6 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
to Macdonald were put in evidence by the defence, which tended
to show that Macdonald had the full confidence of the Depart
ment down to the very date of the seizures. Some post-office
officials were called to prove that the mail boxes in St. Louis
were not intended for the depositing of valuable matter, and one
of them said he could open any of the boxes with a stick.
Joyce's letters to General Babcock, and the letters of Babcock
in reply, were read in evidence. Their nature has already been
stated. The correspondence was begun in 1871 by Joyce for
warding editorials to Babcock, and some idea of Joyce's bombastic
style may be gathered from such expressions as these : "This is
the way General Macdonald and myself win friends for the admin
istration." " I enclose herewith an article from the pen of the
undersigned. Sumner and Schurz are for the first time shown up
in their true light." "How do you like the ring of the article?
We will make the * cops ' of this State hump themselves in the
campaign of '72." To all such letters General Babcock sent
courteous replies and acknowledgements, and was thus drawn on by
Joyce into the telegraphic correspondence which led to the charge
now made against him.
Several letters from the revenue agent Hoag to a member of
the ring, Gordon Bingham, were also introduced, and their con
tents showed that Hoag was keeping the ring advised of every
thing that was contemplated to be done at Washington, in con
sideration of the bribe that had been paid him. This man went
to Canada to escape punishment.
To rebut the statement of Everest about the two $500 bills,
and neutralize its effect, a witness was called for the defence, —
a letter-carrier named Magill, — who testified that he had opened
the mail-box near the Supervisor's office at Joyce's request, and
handed back to him the two letters addressed to Avery and Bab
cock. The counsel for the Government were unable to impeach
this man's veracity, but he was dismissed from the service because
of his inconvenient memory.
The last witness for the defence was the President himself,
whose deposition had been taken before Chief Justice Waite at
the Executive Mansion. President Grant testified that he had
known General Babcock since 1863, having first met him during
the Vicksburg campaign in that year. From about March 1864
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. 41 /
to the 4th March, 1869, General Babcock was an aide-de-camp
on his military staff, and since that time had been acting as his
private secretary. He had also, for several years, been Superin
tendent of the Public Buildings and Grounds.
His duty as private secretary was to carry to Congress all
communications of the President, and he had charge of all corres
pondence, particularly that of an official character. He received
the mails, opened letters and referred them to the appropriate
Departments, submitting to the President such as required instruc
tion or -answer from himself. Applications from persons through
out the country to lay their matters before the President were of
almost daily occurrence. "I have always," said the President,
"regarded him as a most efficient and faithful officer. If an
intimate association of twelve years with a man gives one an
opportunity of judging what others think of him, I have certainly
had not only an excellent opportunity of knowing his character
myself, but of hearing the general reputation he sustains. That
reputation is good." He then stated that he was intimately
acquainted with Collector Ford, first in the State of New York
when he was a lieutenant in the army, and Ford a young lawyer
in the same town, and subsequently, from 1854 to 1860, when
they were both living in St. Louis County. When Ford died,
General Babcock brought him a dispatch from Joyce, in which
Joyce practically applied for the position. "When General Babcock
exhibited to me the dispatch from Joyce, I said to him that, as
Mr. Ford had died away from home, and very suddenly, I would,
in the selection of a successor, be guided to a great extent by
the wishes of his bondsmen. The bondsmen recommended
Constantine Maguire. I do not think Babcock ever sought to
influence the appointment of Maguire, nor do I believe he was
aware of the existence of Constantine Maguire prior to his recom
mendation as the successor of Mr. Ford. I do not remember of
Babcock ever speaking to me on the subject of charges against
Joyce or Macdonald; he took no lively interest in the matter, or
I should have recollected it. He did not seek to influence my
action in reference to any investigation into the alleged whisky
frauds in St. Louis. I do not remember one instance when he
talked with me on the subject of these investigations, excepting
since his indictment. It was then simply to say to me that he
41 8 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
had asked Mr. Douglass why it was his department treated all
their officials as though they were dishonest persons, who
required to be watched by spies; why he could not make inspec
tions similar to those which prevailed in the army, selecting for
the purpose men of character, who could enter the distilleries,
examine the books, and make reports which could be relied upon
as correct." As to Macdonald's visit to Washington the President
said: "I remember Macdonald being in Washington in February
1874, but not the precise date. I picked him up on the sidewalk
as I was taking a drive. I invited him to go with me. I have
no recollection of any word or words, or any matter touching
his official position or business."
The President was next interrogated as to the order changing
the supervisors; and his testimony utterly routed and exploded
the theory of the prosecution, that its revocation was brought
about by the intercession of Babcock in the interest of the St.
Louis whisky ring. He confirmed the statement of Supervisor
Tutton in every particular.
'"Some time when Mr. Richardson was Secretary, I think,' he said, — 'at
all events, before Secretary Bristow became the head of the Department,
Mr. Douglass, in talking with me, expressed the idea that it would be a
good plan occasionally to shift the various Supervisors from one district to
another. I expressed myself favorably tqward it, but it was not done then ;
nor was it thought of any more by me, until it became evident that the
Treasury was being defrauded of a portion of the revenue that it should
receive from the distillation of spirits in the West. Secretary Bristow, at that
time, called on me and made a general statement of his suspicions, when I
suggested to him this idea. On that suggestion the order making these
transfers of Supervisors was made. At that time I did not understand that
there was any suspicion at all of the officials, but that each official had his
own way of transacting his business. These distillers having so much pecu
niary interest in deceiving the officials, learn their ways and know how to
avoid them. My idea was, that by putting in new Supervisors, acquainted
with their duties, over them, they would run across and detect their crooked
ways. This was the view I had, and explains the reason why I suggested
the change.'
"Q. 'Can you state whether Mr. Douglass, at that time Commissioner of
Internal Revenue, was aware of the fact that you suggested or made the
order? A. -I do not know that he knew anything about it.'
"Q. 'After the order had been finally issued, were any efforts made to
induce you to order its revocation or suspension? A. Yes, sir; most strenuous
efforts.'
"Q. 'Were such efforts made by prominent public men? Did you resist
THE TRI/vL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. 419
the pressure that was made upon you for the revocation or suspension of the
order, and if you finally decided to direct the revocation of that order, will
you please state why you were induced to do so and by whom? A. I
resisted all efforts to have the order revoked, until I became convinced that
it should be revoked or suspended in the interests of detecting frauds that
had already been committed. In the conversation with Supervisor Tutton,
he said to me that if the object of that order was to detect frauds that had
already been committed, he thought it would not be accomplished. He
remarked that this order was to go into effect on the i5th of February.
This conversation occurred late in January. He alleged that it would give
the distillers who had been defrauding the Treasury three weeks notice to
get houses in order, and be prepared to receive the*new Supervisor. That
he, himself, would probably go in a district where frauds had been com
mitted, and he would find everything in good order, and he would be com
pelled so to report. That the order would probably result in stopping the
frauds at least for a time, but would not lead to the detection of those that
had already been committed. He said that if the order was revoked, it
would be regarded as a triumph for those who had been defrauding the
Treasury. It would throw them off their guard, and we could send special
agents of the Treasury to the suspected distilleries — send good men, such a
one as he mentioned, Mr. Brooks. They could go out and would not be
known to the distillers, and before they could be aware of it, the latter's
frauds could be detected. The proofs would be complete, the distilleries
could be seized and their owners prosecuted. I felt so conscious that his
argument was sound, and that it was in the interest of the detection and
punishment of fraud that this order should be suspended, that I then told
him that I would suspend it immediately, and I did so without any further
consultation with any one. My recollection is, that I Wrote the direction for
the suspension of the order on a card, in pencil, before leaving my office
that afternoon, and that order was issued and sent to the Treasury -by one
of my secretaries.'
"Q. 'Did General Babcock ever, in any way, directly or indirectly, seek
to influence your action in reference to that order? A. I do not remember
his ever speaking to me about it or exhibiting any interest in the matter.' '
In answer to further questions, President Grant said: "To my
knowledge, General Babcock has not undertaken to prevent an
investigation of his alleged connection with the St. Louis whisky
ring. He has not used any effort with myself, or any one else,
to prevent the finding of indictments against any person suspected
of complicity with the ring. I have never seen anything in his
conduct, nor has he said anything to me, which indicated that
he was in any way interested in or connected with the St. Louis
whisky ring. I have always had great confidence in his integrity
and efficiency."
42O LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
The questions propounded by the Government counsel on the
cross-examination were of the most searching and inquisitorial
character, no deference being shown the President on account of
his high official position. He answered them all in his own
plain, straightforward way, as will be seen:
"Q. 'General, of course you do not suppose, do you, that while General
Babcock has been your private secretary, and in intimate and confidential
relations with you, any one would voluntarily come to you with statements
injurious to his reputation? A. I do not know any such thing.'
"Q. 'Perhaps you are aware, General, that the whisky ring have
persistently tried to fix the origin of that ring in the necessity for funds to
carry on political campaigns. Did you ever have any information from
General Babcock, or any one else, in any manner, directly or indirectly,
that any funds for political purposes were being raised by any improper
methods? A. I never did; I have seen since these trials intimations of that
sort in the newspapers, but never before.'
"Q. 'Then let me ask you if the prosecuting officers have not been
entirely correct in repelling all insinuations that you ever had tolerated any
such means for raising funds? A. I was not aware that they had attempted
to repel any insinuations.' '
He went on to say —
"I never had a suspicion that anything was wrong about Ford. I had as
much confidence in him as in any person I knew in St. Louis. We corres
ponded regularly, because I had such confidence in him that I left him to
conduct my own affairs there ; and I had to be constantly sending him money.
I would send checks^to him of $500, $1000, and $1200 at a time, and he
would pay out the money and account to me for it. My confidence in him
was such that I did that without even saving my letters. Joyce was not
recommended to me as Ford's successor by Babcock. He presented to me
a despatch that he had received from Joyce, making application for the posi
tion. My reply to him was, that I should be guided largely in selecting the
successor of Mr. Ford by the recommendation of his bondsmen. He having
died suddenly, unexpectedly and away from home, I thought they were enti
tled to be, at least, consulted as to the successor who should settle up his
accounts.
"Q. 'Did you advise General Babcock to telegraph to Joyce to get the
bondsmen of Ford to recommend Joyce for Collector ? A. I made the state
ment in substance that I made in answer to a former question. Whether I*
told him to so telegraph or not it would be impossible for me to say. That
might be regarded as at least authority to so telegraph.'
"Q. ' Dkl you see any telegram of that character from Babcock to Joyce
at that time? A. I do not remember to have seen any.'
"Q. 'Did General Babcock at that time show you a despatch from Joyce
in these words?
"'Sx. Louis, October 28, 1873. — See dispatch to the President. We mean
it. Mum. JOYCE.''
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. 421
"A. 'I do not think that my memory goes back to that time. Since these
prosecutions were commenced I have seen that.'
"I left the nomination of Ford's successor to his bondsmen," the President
went on to say, "because they were liable on the bond, and some of them
were men I knew very well, and had great confidence in. I do not remem
ber to have received a protest against Macdonald's appointment, signed by
Carl Schurz and others; I do not know that it would have had any parti
cular weight with me, his endorsement being good. I had never heard of
Joyce, and did not know of the existence of such a man until he was
appointed on the recommendation of the then Commissicner. I knew that
Babcock received frequent letters from Joyce, for I saw a number of them
myself; and those that I did see were generally as to what he was doing
in the way of writing editorials for the different papers and inclosing edito
rials, which he would say in his letters he had written, and asking how he
liked the tone of them and so on ; I recollect of him saying in one letter
that some papers in the State of Missouri, and, perhaps, in Arkansas — at
different points, at all events — were willing to publish as editorials, matter
that he would write for them. He showed me a letter that had been
handed to him from somebody in Philadelphia to Mr. Rogers, and he said
that appeared to his judgment to be simply blackmailing, and I think that
was the occasion when he told me what he had said to Mr. Douglass ;
that is as I remember it now. I have heard General Babcock' s explanation
of most or all of'these dispatches."
" Q. 'You have said that you resisted the pressure brought to bear on
you by prominent public men in regard to the suspension or revocation of
the order transferring Supervisors. If you have no objections, will you please
state the names of those prominent men who brought that pressure to bear
on you ? A. There were many persons, and I think I could give the names
of several Senators, and probably other members of Congress, but probably
I should have to refer to the papers that are on file. I do not know that
it is material. I know that the pressure was continual from the Supervisors
and their friends.'
"Q. 'Can you, from memory, name any Senators or Representatives? A.
I could name two or three, but I do not believe that it is necessary.'
"Q. 'Did General Babcock at the time tell you he had endeavored to
influence Commissioner Douglass to revoke that order? A. No.'
"Q. 'Since you say that General Babcock has not manifested to you any
desire to interfere with or prevent the trial of the indictments against him
self and others, will you be so good as to state whether any of his friends
for him, have at any time since these indictments were found endeavored
to prevent the trial of the indictments against him or any other indicted
parties? If so, please state who have made such efforts? A. They have
not with me.'
"Q. 'Did Gen. Babcock show you a telegram from District Attorney
Dyer, saying that the next conspiracy case would be tried on December
J5, 1875? A. He did. I did not remember about the date particularly.'
" Q. 'Now I suppose, Mr. President, that the substance of your testimony
422 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
is — what we all know to be true — that if there has been any misconduct on
the part of General Babcock, it has not come to your knowledge ? A. Yes,
sir, that is true.'
"Q. 'You do not know, of course, do you, whether Mr. Douglass sug
gested to Secretary Bristow the same thing about the transfer of Super
visors what you say he originally suggested to you? A. I do not know
anything about it except from the Secretary himself.'"
It was expected that the Government would call some wit
nesses to impeach the credibility of Magill, but they did not do
so, and the case on both sides was closed.
Judge Porter moved the Court for a peremptory charge to the
jury, directing an acquittal, on the ground that no sufficient
evidence had been produced to carry the case to the jury on its
merits.
"We supposed," he said, "that we might well have raised the question of law
which we now propose to submit, at the close of the evidence for the pros
ecution, but we thought it advisable in any view, we thought it due to the
court, to the jury, to the defendant and the cause of public justice, and the
country at large, that all questions in regard to the mooted facts should be
removed by affirmative evidence upon our part, such as we did not our
selves deem to be necessary, but which was proper, and which we were bound
to submit. We pursue in this case the same line which was adopted on the
trial of Judge Fullerton in the Circuit Court of New York, before the illus
trious and lamented jurist, Judge Woodruff. We preferred not to raise the
question until the whole evidence was before the court. And now, in view
of that evidence, we respectfully submit for the consideration of your Honors
whether the precise case has not arisen which has been so often acted upon,
not only in England, under the common law, but by the ablest and most
eminent jurists, as well in the Federal as in the State courts, under like cir
cumstances. We think it is a case which calls upon the court for the same
interposition which we find reported extensively in the books from jurists like
Marshall, like Story, like Curtis, like Woodruff, not to mention others who
are still among the living, and whose names shall be equally honored when
they shall have passed from the scenes of life."
After reviewing the undisputed facts of the case in relation to
the conspiracy, he came to the question, — Was Babcock an
agent ?
"The prosecution has had the advantage of six months unwearied services
of the detective force of the Treasury Department — the best organized detec
tive body that perhaps was ever to be found in any country except that
headed in' France under the reign of the First Napoleon, by the celebrated
Fouche. They have had advantages, not only those facilities which are
afforded the commercial community, but they have been furnished with force
and ability to reach and produce the unsealed correspondence of General
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. 423
Babcock, whatever it was, with any one on earth, through the telegraphic
dispatches. They have had the further advantage of a publication of this
case extending to forty millions of people, through the constant notice in the
public papers of the accusations, or suspicions, or rumors or supposed evi
dence against General Babcock; and now, when we come to the day of trial,
what is the result? They have not produced from all these sources one
single letter from General Babcock showing his knowledge of the conspiracy,
or his purpose to aid in accomplishing its end."
The letter that Everest mailed at Joyce's request, he was
unable to swear contained money, and there was evidence that
Joyce had reclaimed it from the box. It was a trick of Joyce
to restore confidence to the minds of his confederates in crime,
to induce them to make further advances of money. Babcock's
conduct throughout had been entirely open and straight-forward.
He sent no information of the coming of revenue agents, and
did not even know when they were to be sent out. " If he was
a conspirator, he was so without conspiring, without word or
act, without knowledge of the covenant, without motive, without
temptation, and without reward."
Judge Dillon overruled the motion for two reasons. First,
there were facts which were not undisputed, — for example, those
relating to the letter testified to by Everest and Magill. Second,
the proper inferences to be drawn from the telegrams and other
facts were not so clear and certain, in the mind of the Court, as
to enable them to declare their effect as a matter of law. The
case must therefore be left in the hands of the jury. The jury,
however, were warned that this denial of the motion must not
be construed into an indication of the opinion of the Court as
to the strength of the evidence. That would come in its proper
place in the instructions the Court would give at the close of
the argument.
On the eleventh day of the trial, Colonel Broadhead made
the opening argument for the prosecution. He began by remind
ing the jury that the nation was oppressed by a public debt
which was paralyzing the arm of industry in almost every part of
the country, and that the taxes raised for the purpose of paying off
that debt fell more or less heavily on every citizen. This appeal to
the pockets of the jury, — which was composed largely of Missouri far
mers, — was shrewdly calculated to arouse them to indignation against
the whisky thieves, who had stolen, as Colonel Broadhead put it,
424 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORRS.
" enough money to pay the interest upon the public debt." It
was hoped by the Government counsel that in this storm of in
dignation General Babcock would be swept away. Colonel Broad-
head next impressed the jury with a sense of their own dignity
by telling them that the ties of party obligation were such that
the people themselves could not remedy the evils of corrupt ad
ministration by means of the ballot-box, but that their only safe
guard was in the strict enforcement of the law by courts and
juries. " You," he said, " have it in your hands to purify the
country of corruption." If they were satisfied of the defendant's
guilt, they must convict him, no matter how high his position,
nor what might have been his previous character in the history
of this country or in his own private life. "The law is no
respecter of persons; high and low, rich and poor, are equally
subject to its provisions." With this impressive exordium, Colo
nel Broadhead proceeded to state the law as to proof of conspir
acy and reviewed at great length the history of the St. Louis
ring. Coming to the telegrams, he made the most of the pecu
liar wording of those of Joyce, and held General Babcock
responsible for the inferences that the Government counsel drew
from them. He ridiculed the suggestion that the word "mum"
meant that Joyce wanted his having been a candidate kept quiet.
Was there any disgrace in having been a candidate? To break
the force of the argument for the defence, that Macdonald
knew of the abandonment of Brooks' expedition before Bab
cock did, he insinuated that, notwithstanding Macdonald's
gleeful telegram about the goose, dated December 8th, the
Commissioner really did not change his mind till the
1 5th, two days after Babcock's '-Sylph" telegram. But there
was no evidence of this, and the Commissioner's own testimony
disproved it. Notwithstanding the President's own plain testi-
rmony, he insisted that no effort had been made by politicians
to induce President Grant to recall the order as to the Supervi
sors. He made much of the mysterious word "Sylph," and
claimed that it was a cipher agreed upon between Joyce and
Babcock; as to which, again, there was no evidence. These
examples-, together with the astute Colonel's way of reading the
first telegram from Babcock, — "See that Ford's bondsmen
recommend you," — accentuating the word you, — are sufficient to
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. 425
show how determined these partisans of Bristow were to convict
General Babcock at all hazards. Colonel Broadhead, not being
able to impeach Mr. Tutton's veracity, insisted that his reasons
for asking the President to suspend the order were puerile, and
that the President's interference was "most unusual, and of
doubtful authority under the law." Notwithstanding the straight
forward testimony of Major Grimes, he still saw something wrong
in B-abcock's corresponding with Macdonald under cover to that
gentleman, and concluded his argument by saying:
"If Babcock had a general knowledge of the object of these parties; that
they were attempting to defraud the Government, and he aided them in
doing it either by warning them of the approaching danger, or assisting
them in the rescinding of orders, or anything else by which they could have
been benefited, whether he ever received money or not, it matters not, he
is a guilty party to this crime. It matters not how high he may have stood ;
it matters not what position he may have held, if he is guilty of this crime
he is to be punished. When the Minister of Charles I. was arraigned before
the House of Lords for high treason, not against the King, but against the
laws ot the country, that distinguished commoner, in his eloquent denuncia-
ti( n of the Earl of Strafford, said 'nothing can be more equitable than he
should perish by the justice of that, law w'hich he would have subverted,'
and he spoke of a man who had sat side by side with him as a vindicator
of the law and a champion of English liberty in days past. But he had
yielded to the inducements of Charles I., and betrayed the people, and he
met his just judgment. So, gentlemen, if you should find from the facts
in this case that corruption has nestled within the precincts of the Presiden
tial Mansion, it becomes your duty to crush it out, no matter what may be
the consequences."
Mr. Storrs followed Colonel Broadhead, and occupied the after
noon of Saturday and all of the following Monday with his argu
ment for the defence. "The fame of Mr. Storrs' qualities as an
advocate," said the Globe-Democrat, "had gone abroad, and an eager
throng crowded every avenue leading to the court-room in the
hope of gaining a chance to listen to the expected eloquence.
Not more than one-fifth of the applicants for places could, how
ever, be accommodated, and the police had a hard time in keep
ing the surging multitude in order. They succeeded, however,
and in spite of the crush outside, the inside of the court-room
presented throughout the whole afternoon an appearance of per
fect order. Mr. Storrs' few first words were so quietly delivered
that they were hardly audible across the court-room, but, as he
warmed to his subject, his matchless elocution and splendidly
426 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
modulated voice told with thrilling effect on every listener, and
his disclaimer of any intended oratorical effort only served to
point more effectively the eloquence with which he conducted
his completely logical chain of argument. The speaker's frame is
fragile, and his organization extremely nervous; it therefore
seemed, to all who heard him, a marvel that so vast a power of
vocal inflection could be wrought out from so apparently slender
a physical basis. As point after point in his argument was
made, his powerful voice seemed to shake the frame from which
it issued, as a high-pressure engine will shake a piece of delicate
machinery. After about an hour of his speech the intensity of
his emotions began to tell on the strength of his voice, and
hardly anybody was surprised when, near 4 o'clock, his physical
energies succumbed, and he had to ask the indulgence of the
court to continue his argument on Monday morning."
The first premonitory symptoms of the disease which so sud
denly cut him off had appeared at this early stage of his career.
In asking an adjournment, Mr. Storrs said:
"I have palpitation of the heart sometimes, and I shall have to rest
some minutes, at all events. It will be very difficult for me to talk much
more.
"Mr. Dyer. 'I ask, if your Honors will grant my request, that Mr. Storrs
be permitted to close his argument on Monday morning. I dislike to ask
so much more time,- but I know he would willingly go on if he were in a
condition to do so."'
Mr. Storrs began his argument by referring to the great public
interest which this case had excited, and went on to say:
"I am a firm, thorough, devoted believer in the ultimate right of what is
called public opinion. I believe that it is almost always correct and almost
always right upon the premises upon which it is founded. A well regulated
public opinion, understanding all the facts, moving without bias or preju
dice or passion, is, I am glad to recognize, the surest earthly evidence we
have of truth. But, gentlemen of the jury, it has never been considered a
very safe element in the administration of justice, since nearly 2,000 years
ago it profaned the judgment seat, and insulted heaven with the cry 'cru
cify him, crucify him !' You are here, to-day, as jurors in a great and
solemn case. I am here as an advocate in that case. You have your duties
to perform, I have mine; and I ask, I pray you, gentlemen, as we both
enter upon the performance of these duties, that we may do it with hearts
void of offense toward all ; that you may dismiss from your minds every
bias of prejudice and passion, which by any earthly possibility could h#ve
found a lodgment there; that with clear judgment, unwarped by any breezes
or heats of public controversy ; that with unprejudiced hearts, unaffected by
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. 42/
the poison of political passion, and that with pure, upright, honest judgment,
untwisted by any mere private feelings of your own, we may approach the
discussion of this great case.
" Let us, with God's help and our own, reach in the investigation we are
pursuing, and in the conclusions to which we shall ultimately arrive, the
full height and measure of this mighty argument. If you have prejudices,
dismiss them. If you have preconceived opinions, put them do\vn. If you
have feelings that have already been aroused, smother them. Approach and
come to this great question with that rectitude and perfect fiber of conscience
which the law and your own better judgment demand. We are all, gentle
men of the jury, far, very far from being perfect. There is no duty which
men are ever called upon to perform so solemn in its nature as that of pass
ing judgment upon the motives of our fellows.
"The poet has well said, and I repeat it;
•In men, whom men condemn as ill,
I find so much of goodness still;
In men, whom men pronounce divine,
I find so much of sin and blot;
I hesitate to draw the line
Between the two where God has not. ' '
He complimented Colonel Broadhead on the ingenuity of his
argument, "but," said he:
"You will agree with me, gentlemen of the jury, when I tell you that but
one general impression could be drawn from the speech of Col. Broadhead.
It was a speech, gentlemen, without heart and without faith in the case he
advocated ; able to the very last degree, able in the statement of facts which
were not proved, able in the suppression of facts which were proved, able
in the distortion and contortion of facts, the obvious existence of which no
man could controvert. For nearly two weeks have we been engaged in this
investigation. Day after day passed before the name of this defendant had
even been mentioned. We investigated down to the very last detail all the
circumstances attending the conspiracy about which so much has been said,
and concerning which all men's mouths and minds have been full. It is
well for us to-day, gentlemen, it seems to me, before proceeding to the dis
cussion of this case, to determine in our own minds just what the refuse
matter of the case is, and what is the actual issue that this record presents
to us."
He challenged the prosecuting counsel to show a single syllable
in all the vast volume of evidence to which the jury had listened,
directly connecting General Babcock with the conspiracy.
"The Government was defrauded by the removal of high wines without
the payment of the taxes, and more than one thousand miles separated
this defendant from the active theater in which this conspiracy was in oper
ation. How, then, does he become a conspirator? What has he done in
428 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
furtherance or this corrupt and fraudulent scheme? He has removed no
spirits ; that is not claimed. It is avowed by the learned counsel who have
addressed you, that the position that he filled was to furnish information — of
what? They say, of the coming of detectives. I say now to you generally,
gentlemen, and I will demonstrate it before I have finished, that if that was
the part assigned to General Babcock he miserably and wretchedly failed in
its performance ; for, during the whole period of time covered by the opera
tions of this conspiracy, not one single syllable of information did he ever
furnish to the active conspirators with reference to the coming of any human
being here to investigate their frauds. Was it to give information generally ?
There is not in all this vast mass of testimony, piled up as it has been within
the last t\vo weeks, one single syllable of evidence showing, or tending to
show, that General Babcock ever communicated to a single member of this
conspiracy one single item of information which they had not before that
time possessed. To-day it was hinted by Colonel Broadhead that the pecu
liar mission he was to fill, and the special duty, which General Babcock
was to perform, was to prevent the sending of officials hither. There is not
one single syllable of evidence in this case, gentlemen of the jury, and I
challenge your attention to that fact — not one single syllable of evidence
showing, or tending to show, that he ever prevented a single man from com
ing here. 1 pause right here upon the very threshold of this case. What
in the name of God was he to do? For what was he to be paid? What
part was he expected to play in this grand conspiracy ? Two weeks have
come and gone, reams and reams of testimony have been taken, the whole
power of the Government has been employed for nearly a year in develop
ing the facts. The cradle and the grave have been robbed for evidence.
Every telegraph office in the country has been ransacked and raided, the
sanctity of privileged communications between counsel and client has been
invaded, and yet down to to-day there is not one single syllable of evidence
from which any honest, right-minded man can say that he could tell or
guess what part in this conspiracy General Babcock was to play."
He appealed for a fair construction of the telegrams which had
been put in evidence.
"Now, gentlemen, you must, when you come to consider these facts, put
yourselves back to the period of time when all these facts occurred. When
you come to read these dispatches and these letters you must read them
not in the light of to-day. It is a false light; it will mislead you; but in
the light of the day when they were written, and when the parties to them
received and read them. Read these telegrams sent to Babcock in the
light of the days when he received and read them, when Joyce and Macdon-
ald were, so far as he knew, honored officials and trusted men ; and do not
read them in the light of to-day, when, broken in character and bankrupt
in reputation, they fill a convict's cell. Read them, remembering this, that
with all the gigantic preparations that have characterized this case from its(
commencement till to-day, not one single syllable of evidence has been
adduced that General Babcock ever suspected, or had reason to suspect, that
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. 429
down to the time of their indictment, Joyce and Macdonald had been
engaged in any conspiracy against the Government. I challenge your atten
tion, one and all — your solemn attention — to this inquiry : Go through with
all the patience and care that you can, note every word that has been
dropped upon the witness-stand, and tell me where is the proof that Gen
eral Babcock ever suspected, or had reason to suspect, that Joyce and
Macdonald were engaged in a scheme to defraud the Government. Take
this question, put it in your heart of hearts, carry it with you into the jury-
box, look each other in the face, and ask each other that question, and then
come back into court with the solemnities of your oaths resting upon you,
and answer to this court and to the country. Where is the evidence? In
ordinary times and under ordinary circumstances, I might rest this case
right there. I defy any man who knows the evidence in this case to point
to me the spot or place which indicates that General Babcock knew the
corrupt schemes in which Joyce and Macdonald were engaged ; and if he
knew them not, the case fails at its very threshold. Gentlemen of the jury,
either of you may give information of the most unimportant character to a
man who in his heart is the most notorious scoundrel on the planet. The
information which you then communicate may be absolutely indispensable
to enable the party to whom it is communicated to consummate and carry
out the crime. But you know in your hearts, and, following me, have
already made the suggestion to yourselves, that the communication that
that intelligence which may have ripened into the most stupendous crime,
can not implicate you unless you knew the character of the man to whom
it was given, and the purpose for which it was to be employed."
Mr. Storrs proceeded to review the telegrams between Joyce
and Babcock, and to show their entire innocence, so far as
General Babcock was concerned.
*' Ford was an old-time friend of the President. They had been old-time
friends for a quarter of a century. He had died, and if there is a man in
this country whose heart warms up to his old friends and those whom he
had known in his earlier days, it is the heart of the President of the United
States. He is very slow to forget them; he is very slow to bury out of sight
any act of kindness that in olden time they have done for him. He is very
quick and ready to forgive the old friend whom for a quarter ot a century
he had known, and who was dead. Away from home, alone, suddenly, he had
died; and with that pall about him, Joyce knew the chord that he would strike.
He telegraphed to the Private Secretary of the President, ' Poor Ford is
dead. Macdonald is with his body.' Gentlemen of the jury, is that evidence
of guilt? In the name of God, to what conditions have we reached if that
is evidence of guilt? What will you have a man do in order to avoid a
conclusion of guilt? What shall he not do in order that he shall not be
considered guilty ? On the very day that Ford died, or on the very day at
least that this dispatch was forwarded by Joyce to Babcock, the sureties
upon the bonds of Ford interested in the matter, telegraphed to the Presi-
430 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
dent. Let me read to you, and let me explain the situation, because, when
the situation is fully explained, the miserable pretense that there is guilt in
these dispatches fades entirely away, and it leaves no smear or stain, except
upon the hands and tongues of those who have made the charge. Ford
was away from home when he died. His sureties, leading, prominent men
in the city of St. Louis, were liable for all the acts of his deputies, of whom
they knew nothing. The bond was a large one, and it was a question in
which their interests were very seriously involved. Accordingly, on the 25th
day of October, 1873, the very day upon which Joyce had sent this dispatch,
this one was forwarded to the President : ' Please see our dispatch of this day
to Delano, and tell us how, as securities of our friend C. W. Ford, we can
protect ourselves from any wrong action of his deputies.' Now watch, gen
tlemen, and see the light come in ; watch and see these unhealthy vapors,
which have been thrown around this case for the last month, dispel them
selves and shrink away."
He showed from the President's deposition that General Bab-
cock had not recommended Joyce, and had nothing to do with the
appointment of Maguire as Collector.
"Now, I come to the first dispatch from Babcock, and you remember
the hullabaloo about the accent, ' See that Ford's bondsmen recommend
you.' I do not care where you accent that, in view of these facts. You
may put the accent all along, so that there shall be no partiality in way of
accent; you may accent it at either end, or both ends, or through the mid
dle, but, with the facts, there is not the slightest earthly significance to
the accent. Why did he send that, now? Why, you know that the Presi
dent had first told him that he was going to consult Ford's bondsmen, and
answering Joyce's dispatch, he says to him — it amounts to this when it is all
expressed: 'You cannot get this place unless Ford's bondsmen recommend
you. If you do, you are doubtless all right ; if you do not, you are just as
doubtless all wrong.' Ford's bondsmen did not recommend him ; and now
I come to another very extraordinary feature in this case. Colonel Broad-
head says that Joyce tried to get Ford's bondsmen to recommend Maguire.
Now, what is the matter with that statement? Nothing, only it ain't true.
The only objection I have to it is that there is not the slightest foundation
in fact for it ; and that, I beg to remark, in a court of justice, is always
considered a serious objection to a statement. Treated as a pure romance,
as a mere effort of the imagination, I might admire it; as such, I do,
because it does require an athletic effort of the imagination, which I must
admire, to get out from the facts in this case, and the sea of evidence which
surrounds it, the remarkable statement that Joyce tried to get Ford's bonds
men to recommend Maguire. Gentlemen, there is not a single syllable of
proof, or semblance of proof, of this statement. My good old friend, Colonel
Broadhead, ought to have known better, and I think he does.
"We have all been in conventions, and we have seen a candidate for nomi
nation, after it has become perfectly evident to him that he cannot succeed,
worship the rising sun, rush to the front, and with a marvelous show
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. 431
of magnanimity, move the unanimous nomination of his rival. On
the 28th day of October, 1873, John A. Joyce, finding that his own
aspirations had faded away, comes with a show of magnanimity absolutely
splendid, and says, 'Macdonald and I recommend you to do what you have
already decided to do. We recommend you to nominate Constantine
Maguire because we know you are going to do it. We recommend you to
nominate Maguire because the bondsmen to whom, in a great measure, you
are to submit this question have a day or two before this recommended him ;'
and then, after having done that utterly useless piece of literature, the whole
thing having been previously determined, he sits down and writes a dispatch
to General Babcock, which the General never answered — ' See our dispatch
to the President. We mean it. Mum.'
"Colonel Broadhead asks what that means. Just exactly what it says.
Joyce always did attach to his dispatches an importance which nobody else
attached to them. The real moving men, upon whose recommendation the
appointment of Constantine Maguire depended, were Krum, John M.; Henry
T. Blow and \Villiam H. Benton, the sureties on Ford's bond. They had
spoken ; they had represented to the President the danger that they were in
from the action of Ford's deputies. The whole question had been settled.
Mum about what? Mum about Maguire's appointment? How ridiculous
that is! Why every newspaper in the country had published that to the
world. Mum about what? Mum about the fact which these gentlemen did
not know till this trial began. Mum about the fact that Joyce himself had
been an applicant for the place. Why, Colonel Broadhead says that is queer.
Not a bit of it. He had been an applicant and was defeated. Now, gen
tlemen of the jury, men are not anxious to have unnecessarily published
to the world the fact that they had applied for an office and could not get
it. Joyce was like the balance of mankind in that respect precisely.
Translated in full, he says to Babcock : ' I come down ; I am beaten ; I
am perfectly satisfied, so far as I am concerned, with Maguire's appoint
ment; I carry no disappointment in my heart; but, General, there is no use
saying to these fellows down here — it may affect me with them, and there
is no use in publishing the fact — that I myself wanted the place and did
not get it.'
"Joyce accepted the situation, and telegraphed to Babcock that he waived
his own claims, because he was obliged to waive them ; and then he goes
on to say that this fact, circulating in the newspapers, the newspaper hawks
had got hold of it — 'just enough to spread themselves — ' as he says, 'and
tell more than anybody else knew.' Now, then, I read the balance of this
letter, gentlemen of the jury, because, although it is dead and lifeless, yet
it is eloquent with the truth of the situation, which these parties held toward
each other at that time: 'I am sure,' he says, 'if the President act upon
the recommendation of the bondsmen and what has been sent from the
officers, the interests of the Government will be secured, and the public
generally will be satisfied. Words are not sufficient to convey to yourself
and the President the pride I feel for the confidence thus far displayed in
me in connection with the vacancy. I shall endeavor in my future action
432 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
to continue to meet the good wishes of the President, and you will please
convey to him my most hearty thanks for his kindness and confidence.'
"Now, gentlemen of the jury, unless, since this investigation began, human
nature has changed itself, unless the whole current of human affairs has
been reversed, unless human motives and the methods in which they express
themselves have been absolutely revolutionized, it is utterly impossible that
on the day that letter was dated, written and received, General Babcock held
to John A. Joyce the relation of one conspirator to another. Why, the
entire purpose, object, scope and intent of the letter is to impress upon its
recipient the idea that he, Joyce, is engaged not in any scheme to defraud
the revenue, but that he is an honest, faithful, vigilant officer, in whom, by
the President and his Private Secretary, the largest measure of confidence
can with safety be reposed. In the presence of these facts which are in
this record, gentlemen of the jury, and which can not be removed from it,
I denounce the charge which is made against this defendant as participating
in the appointment of Maguire for any guilty purpose, as wicked and cruel
to the last degree."
Their Sunday's rest appeared to have had a good effect on the
jury, who all looked bright and fresh when they came into Court
on Monday morning. Though Mr. Storrs had spent his Sunday
largely in laborious preparation, he also arrived in good spirits,
and as he would say, "with his war paint on." The interval
was fortunate for him both ways, because he was ready for a
good day's talk and the jury were refreshed and ready to listen.
"As soon as Court was set and counsel were in their places, "-
to quote again from the admirable report of the Globe-Democrat,
— "Mr. Storrs commenced his argument in a quiet, business-like
fashion, which created a feeling of disappointment among those
new attendants who had come expecting a sensational palaver.
They did not know the manner of the great advocate to whom
they were about to listen. He commences always in a low mon
otone; his speeck slow, deliberate and passionless as a money
lender discussing the value of securities offered for a loan. It is
possible Mr. Storrs has had opportunities for studying this pecu
liar style of oratory, as many men of genius have had before
him. After a few preliminary remarks, in which he rehearsed
the concluding points of his speech on Saturday, he warmed to
his subject, and, before fifteen minutes had past, had, with his
vivid and powerful reasoning, made an electric circuit between
himself and his auditors which compelled a vibrative response
from every mind and heart in the throng. Like the day on
which he spoke, he commenced dull and torpid (though never
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. 433
cloudy), and like that day his speech soon burst through the
mere morning mist into the full sunshine and splendor of
Demosthenic eloquence. The effect of the speech was perfectly
appalling at times, particularly when he indulged in invective or
irony. His mastery of both these weapons of the rhetorician is
something to wonder at. His ironical remarks concerning the
amazing uselessness of General Babcock as a co-conspirator brought
out a smile from even the iron face of Colonel Dyer, and a smile,
too, which showed that the sagacious, sardonic Prosecuting
Attorney was for once surprised out of thinking out his case into
a genuine expression of admiration for his opponent. But it is
in invective that he showed to the greatest advantage, and his
invective is nearly always maliciously barbed by the delicate air
of refined politeness with which he lacerates the flesh of the
victim, for the time being, under his hands. Mr. Storrs showed
that he was master of the thunder of invective, as well as of the
lancet blade, which hardly leaves outward trace of the stroke
which may reach the life-blood of reputation. When, in reference
to the manner in which the prosecution had been conducted, he
referred to one of the attorneys as having sought certain evidence
with all the savage hunger of a hyena hunting for a cemetery,
his strident tones and impressive gestures sent a thrill throughout
the room such as is rarely known in a law-court."
He first took up Joyce's telegram just before starting for San
Francisco, — "Make D. call off his scandal hounds, that only
blacken the memory of Ford and friends."
"That very dispatch," he said, "is demonstrative, to my mind, as I have
no doubt it will be to yours before I have finished, that not only had
General Babcock no guilty knowledge of the fraudulent purposes which the
gentlemen in St. Louis were promoting, but that they at that time took
every occasion and resorted to every device to conceal from him the real
nature of the schemes in which they were engaged, and to impress upon
him the fact that as officials they were honorable and altogether to be
trusted.
'"Make D. call off his scandal hounds.' For what? In order to prevent
investigation into frauds, supposititious or real, here in the city of St.
Louis? By no means; but another reason is given — 'That only tend to
blacken the memory of Ford and friends.'
"Now, who was Ford? Ford, as I have said to you, was dead. He
had been the old-time friend of the president; their associations had been
cordial, intimate and friendly to the last degree; and Joyce, with the
sagacity and shrewdness which he possessed, knew very well there was no
28
434 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
chord he could possibly strike to which there would be a readier response,
than a defense and protection of the memory of the dead friend of the
President. The President tells you in that terse, vigorous, clear and unmis
takable language for which he is so justly celebrated, precisely who Ford
was. It is a matter of no difference to the President to-day that clouds
have gathered about the memory of Ford. His heart beats as kindly
towards him and his memory as it ever did in the old time a quarter of a
century ago, in the State of New York. Slander may have been piled on
him; all manner of venom may have been heaped upon his memory; the
tooth of scandal may have bitten it through and through ; and yet there
lingers in the heart of the President the same feeling of affection that he
ever entertained toward the memory of his old friend."
After quoting fully the President's deposition in respect to Ford,
Mr. Storrs went on to say :
"It is pleasant, gentlemen, it is delightful, to strike somewhere in the
desolate desert of this case a confidence like that where, through these long
and weary weeks of investigation, in which truth seems to have absolutely
deserted us, in which the confidence of man in his fellow-man seems to
have been a thing of the past — it is absolutely delightful, I say, and
encouraging to our human nature, to strike a green spot like this. Holding a
position the most exalted in the nation, with a reputation world-wide behind
him, the President of the United States has not forgotten or forsaken the
memory of his old friend. Twenty-five years ago — it is a long period of
time in the rushing events which have surrounded us — young men, and
struggling young men together, C. W. Ford and the President became
acquainted in the State of New York. That acquaintance continued
unbroken, undiminished by suspicion, confidence in the integrity of each
other strengthening and strengthening as the years passed on, and finally
when resulting from the gigantic events through which we have passed, the
modest man who is to-day as the head of the nation was elevated to the
position which he occupies, that confidence was undiminished, and hundreds
and thousands of dollars passed between these men of which no sort of
record was kept, no memorandum preserved. Confidence was so perfect
and complete that it was not deemed essential. On the I4th day of March,
1874, Joyce, who understood as well as any man possibly could understand,
the deep feeling of affection which the President entertained towards the
memory of Ford, sends a dispatch to his Private Secretary, sudden and
unannounced.
'Start for San Francisco to-morrow. Make D. call off his scandal
hounds, that only blacken the memory of Ford and friends.'
"Very well did John A. Joyce know that an appeal of that character
made to the Private Secretary of the President would meet with a quick
and ready response, and it did. Taking this dispatch in his hands, the
Private "Secretary of the President, the defendant in this case, did what?
Did, gentlemen of the jury, precisely what you would have done. Ford
was dead and gone ; the grave had covered over him. He had passed the
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. 435
dark river; but his memory was still fresh and green in the heart of the
President. Thus appealed to, the defendant in this case takes that dispatch
and goes to the Commissioner, telling him that he has learned that an
attack is about to be made or has been made on Ford, and confining his
investigations and his inquiries exclusively to that point. The Commissioner
tells him that it is a mistake, and that there are no charges against Ford.
Moreover, and as absolutely characterizing the purpose for which these
inquiries were made, Mr. Douglass, upon the stand, tells you that they
were directed to no officer holding position here in St. Louis — that they had
no reference to any proposed investigation into the probity of their official
conduct, and that not the slightest disposition was exhibited to check these
investigations, to postpone them or to prevent them, but that solely and
exclusively this defendant confines his inquiries to Ford ; and having ascer
tained from the Commissioner that there were no charges against him left,
his errand was finished and complete. And yet, you are asked to deduce
from these circumstances, from this telegram, and from the facts proven in
the case which surround it and light it all up — you are asked to deduce a
conclusion of guilt. To what desperate extremities, in view of these facts,
must this prosecution be driven, when twelve men are drawn from their
homes to sit as jurors under the solemnity of an oath, and they are asked
to put down every prompting of their consciences and every throbbing of
their hearts which, as honorable men, must prompt and throw all in the
same direction, and denounce as a crime an act in the highest measure
honorable to the defendant in this case."
He argued that if Babcock had been in the confidence of the
ring, Joyce would have told him the real reason for calling off
the " scandal hounds." He would have said, " they will discover
our purpose in my absence."
" But this dispatch is an absolute demonstration that not only did General
Babcock not know the schemes in which these men were engaged, but that
Joyce took every means to conceal from him the fact, and render it impos
sible that he should know, understanding perfectly well that if he did know,
from General Babcock he could get no assistance. He assigned the reason
which he did assign, knowing that there he would touch a chord to which
there would be an immediate and instant response."
Had Babcock been a conspirator, he would have known why
Joyce was sent away, and Joyce would have appealed to him to
help him to stay where he was. But Babcock innocently wrote,
" I do not know your instructions on trip to San Francisco ; I
think, though, it is because D. trusts you to do important work."
And Joyce never asked him to intervene, except to have the
" scandal hounds " called off, because they would only " blacken
the memory of Ford and friends."
"You will ask yourselves the question, What, in response to that dis-
436 LIFF. OF EMERY A. STORKS.
patch, did the defendant do? And you will answer, he went to the Com
missioner of Internal Revenue and asked of him whether there were any
charges against Ford in the Eastern District of Missouri. Ford was then
beyond the reach of human process; no indictments could disturb him. His
mouth was closed, his ears could not hear. It was to protect a memory
which I presume this prosecution would have indicted if they could — they
have done the next best thing — not able to drag into this court the memory
of a dead man — not able physically to trail it through the polluted mire
with which these self-convicted felons have filled this court for the last
months and months — yet they have blackened that name ; and it was that
name and that memory, then absolutely above suspicion — and against which
no word, up to that time, of reproach had ever been uttered ; it was with
reference to that name and that memory that this defendant made his
inquiries. That is the act that he did. If it is guilty, punish it. If to
respond to such a call as that is a felony, characterize it as a felony, and
punish it accordingly. But if you do that, gentlemen of the jury, you might
as well leave your own hearts behind you. If you have friends you may as
well prepare to abandon them. There is not a man upon this jury whose
good name is not very dear to him, and in the still hours of the night when
you call up in review your past, and it troops in slow procession by you,
and you think of the future that opens before you, and you see your chil
dren about you, there will occur to you this thought, that there are those
growing up about me, who, when I am dead and gone, will remember the
good deeds that I have done and will vindicate my name. It is the sweet
est reflection which men have, and it comes to us all. If you have no such
friends as that, gentlemen of the jury, you have no friends worth counting
on as such. You would, from your place in heaven, when you are dead
and gone, look down upon and bless the men who .vindicated your name
and saved it safe from scandal ; and to-day and to-morrow, from your jury-
box, I want you to look upon this defendant, and the great and modest
man in whose interests he acts, and thank him for doing for the memory of
C. W. Ford a noble and manly act. Say to him, gentlemen of the jury,
and say to the whole court: 'These are not crimes: these are deeds that
lift us up from the baseness of earth, and make us absolutely immortal.' I
wish that when you come to render your verdict upon this act of Gen.
Babcock and the President, you could render one specifically upon the
deeds which surround that transaction. I wish that you could tell the coun
try, as you would desire to tell the country, trumpet-toned, that here is a
deed selected from the desert which has surrounded us, that is green and
eternal in its beauty and in its freshness."
After arguing that Macdonald's inquiry as to whether revenue
agents had been sent into his district was perfectly legitimate
under the rules of the Department, and was properly answered
by Babcock, he went on to say :
"You will be told, and you have been told that Joyce and Macdonald
were then actively engaged in the perpetration and commission of these
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. 437
frauds. Admit tint that is so, and yet that fastens no stain of guilt upon
this defendant ; because, tracking all through this case, there has not been a
single spot or place where knowledge of that fact has been brought home
to General Babcock. Will you say that he ought to have known it ? If you
feel like saying that, let me demonstrate to you, right here and now, how
unjust and unfair a burden you are placing upon him. Why should he have
known it? Did Douglass know it? No. Douglass was at the very head of
that department ; in his hands were all the evidences, if any evidences existed,
of guilt against Joyce and Macdonald. He tells you that, up to that time,
no official charges of which he had any information had ever been presented
against them. All the rumors of their frauds that could have been gathered
from any quarter would have centered in the office of the Commissioner of
Internal Revenue. Yet Douglass knew nothing against them. How much
more did the Chief Clerk of that department know ? Mr. Rogers tells you
that Jhrough his hands every charge, every hint, every suspicion passed,
and Rogers tells you that at that time he did not even suspect that Joyce
and Macdonald were engaged in the perpetration of frauds against the rev
enue. On the other hand, he regarded them as honorable, upright, active
officials. More than all that ; the Chief Clerk in this very Department, who,
of all others, should have known the fact, had no suspicion ; and months
afterwards — away down into the month of May, 1875, the very month when
these seizures were made, the month when this gigantic fraud was displayed
to the whole country — down to that time, not only did the Chief Clerk of
the Department, a shrewd and sagacious man, know nothing against Joyce
and Macdonald, but he wrote to Macdonald a friendly letter early in May
asking his kindly offices to secure for a friend of his an appointment in
Arkansas, and at a salary of $1,200 a year, and telling him that such an
appointment would confer a great favor upon a member of the Cabinet.
"The Secretary of the Treasury had no suspicions; the President had no
suspicions; the Commissioner of Internal Revenue had no suspicions; the
Chief Clerk of the Department had no suspicions. What more? Did the
world know their guilt as it knows it now ? Nowhere in this country are
the diligent seekers after news more diligent than here ; newspapers, enter
prising to the last degree, vigilant, quick, active, eager, and yet they did
not publish to the world the guilt of Joyce and Macdonald. Here, in their
own home, so far as we know, they were unsuspected. Their immediate
friends looked upon them as honest and upright men. The officials with
whom they were brought into contact looked upon them as efficient and
upright men. And yet, gentlemen of the jury, when all the world else
regarded them as competent and honest officials, you are asked to say that
General Babcock should have known what the testimony in this case has
demonstrated to you nobody else did know.
4 'Had General Babcock occupied the position which the Commissioner of
Internal Revenue occupied there might have been some force in the sug
gestion. Had he occupied the position that Rogers held, there might have
been some force in the suggestion. Bear in mind, too, because the evidence
of silence and the nega'tive evidence in this case are tremendously telling in
438 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORES.
their effect, there is not a single syllable of proof in all this vast record
showing, or tending even to show, that General Babcock ever did visit the
Commissioner of Internal Revenue except upon two occasions — that he ever
visited Mr. Rogers in his office — that he ever had a single word to say with
Mr. Rogers on the subject of revenue affairs in the City of St. Louis. Twice
during all this period of time in the office of the Commissioner of Internal
Revenue — never shown to have exchanged a word with the Secretary of the
Treasury: never shown to have exchanged a word, and the fact is that he
never did exchange a word with Avery, the Chief Clerk in that Department;
never shown to have exchanged a word with the Chief Clerk ip the Depart
ment of Internal Revenue, and yet this defendant, you are required by a
clamor — the parallel of which has never before been witnessed in this coun
try, to hold as having guilty knowledge of facts which the parties who
should have possessed all the information knew nothing about."
He then referred to Hoag's letters to Bingham, a confessed mem
ber of the ring. These letters showed that Hoag had been giving
information to Bingham, who had, in turn, transmitted it to all the
illicit distillers in St. Louis, and Mr. Storrs argued therefrom that
the prosecution had been wasting its time in endeavoring to show
that General Babcock's services were even necessary to the ring,
when they had already bought and paid for the services of a
man who had such vastly better means of procuring and giving
information, as Hoag had. The letters, themselves, created a pro
found sensation as they \vere read in connection with each other
and by the light of the emphasis and concurrent comment the
defendant's counsel gave to them. After the Court adjourned
for recess, these letters were the general topic of talk on the
street. It is true that eight of them had been read before in
evidence, but they had never before been given as one perfect
picture of their unprincipled author's part in the conspiracy.
The expedition of Brooks and Hoag to the West had been
countermanded, and Macdonald, knowing this, sent the jubilant
despatch to Joyce in St. Louis :
" 'Dead dog. Goose hangs altitudilum. The sun shines.' And yet, my
good friend Colonel Broadhead says that the dog, after all, was not dead.
He says that that was merely a hint or suggestion from Macdonald to Joyce
that the dog would ultimately die. But no such language as that did Mac
donald employ. 'Dead dog! the goose hangs altitudilum; the sun shines;'
which, being translated into our vernacular, means : ' I have exploded this
whole business; Brooks and Hoag will not go; that raid is at an end.'
That is the English of it — the other is Macdonaldese.
" Now, here is another curious fact — a very extraordinary fact. Bear in
mind that it is insisted that General Babcock must, all this time, march arm-
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. . 439
in-arm along with Macdonald and Joyce as a guilty conspirator with them.
Why how shamefully they neglected him. How badly they treated him.
They tell you, and would have you and the country believe that the place
which General Babcock was to fill was to prevent these contemplated raids
and to give them information. But Macdonald goes there and himself breaks
up the whole scheme. He personally encounters the great plunderer and
leaguer of the combination, and telegraphs in exulting joy the success of
his trip; and he never favors General Babcock with a single syllable of
information as to the success of his enterprise. Why, was a conspirator ever
treated in that fashion before? They would have you believe that, of all
men in the world, Babcock was the most interested to know how this expe
dition was to terminate — whether it was really to be made. But it was
abandoned long before he saw a single human being with reference to it,
and his co-conspirator never opened his head to him on the subject.
"There is no power of declamation or denunciation, gentlemen of the
jury, that can get around that posture of affairs. Rogers tells you that,
before the letter was shown to him, the trip had been abandoned ; Douglass
tells you that before he saw General Babcock the trip had been abandoned.
The first that General Babcock ever knew that such a trip had been con
templated was when this letter was shown him by Macdonald, and then the
trip had been abandoned ; and yet, reversing the order of all things natural,
a jury of twelve at least ordinarily intelligent men are asked to say upon
their oaths that General Babcock prevented the investigation here in St.
Louis, which investigation had been absolutely abandoned before he knew
that it had been contemplated. Can human perversity, gentlemen of the jury,
go further than that? ' I succeeded; they will not go.' How it must have
amused the hearts of Macdonald and Joyce when they read that dispatch.
•Why,' they say, 'you good-natured young man up there in Washington,
you do not know what you are talking about. You giving us information !
\Vhy, we discount you ; this very information which you are communicating
to us we have had a week ; we knew all about it, but I did not intend you
should know anything about it at all, and left the City of Washington with
out communicating it to you.' That, as you know, is the great corner-stone
of this prosecution. I do not feel, when I deal with evidence so absolutely
worthless as that, like rising up and denouncing the iniquity of this prosecu
tion. 1 feel merely a sensation of thankfulness to the great Being who rules
over us all, that passing the fiery furnace of those ' afflictions, although the
mouth of my client is sealed, and his tongue is dumb, yet there have sprung
urJ to our assistance, as if from the very earth itself, the witnesses by which
we are vindicated. I feel in the presence of interpositions so conspicuously
providential as those which have been disclosed to you to-day, gentlemen,
when I look through the awful danger that has environed him, I feel more
like bowing in prayerful thankfulness before the good God who has saved
him, than from uttering one single syllable of denunciation. And in the presence
of such an intervention as this, of such a great and blessed deliverance as
this, it does seem to me that the tongue of scandal should be hushed and
the voice of detraction should be silent."
4/LO • LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
Mr. Storrs next addressed himself to the history of the order
transferring the Supervisors, showing that General Babcock had
nothing to do with it.
"But," he said, "the gentlemen are not content; they are not satisfied
with the revocation of the order. They think it was unwise and unpatriotic
to revoke it. Let me stop right here to ask you this question: Suppose
they were? What are you here for? To revise the action of the President
and of the Cabinet? By no means. You are not sitting in judgment upon
matters of policy. You are not, as jurors, to determine questions of that
kind. You are to try, not the fact whether General Babcock assisted in
securing the suspension of that order, nor whether he did wisely or not in
procuring its suspension, but you are to inquire whether for any guilty pur
pose, whether as a member of this conspiracy, and with the object of further
ing and aiding it, he did intervene and make the representations to Commis
sioner Douglass which have been detailed here before you. Colonel
Broadhead says that it was an unwise and improper thing to do. What
now, finally, after all the demonstrations that have been made upon that
subject, after the public mind has been filled with poison concerning it for
months and months, what turns out to be the actual truth of the situation?
Months before that time, gentlemen, the President, for the purpose not of
preventing frauds, but for the purpose of aiding in detecting frauds that
had already been committed, devised the scheme of changing the Supervi
sors — not one Supervisor, but all the Supervisors throughout the entire
country. He has told you in his forcible and clear language that the idea
originated with him, not because he suspected the officials, but because they
operated in ruts, that this man had his peculiar way of doing business, of
which the distillers would get the hang, and for the purpose of subjecting
them to new methods and new modes it occurred to him that the transferring
of the Supervisors from one district to another would be wise. Before Mr.
Bristow was appointed Secretary of the Treasury .this whole subject' had
been discussed between the President and Commissioner Douglass. What
ever, gentlemen of the jury, therefore of merit there is to be attached to
the original order belongs to the President. Bristow called upon the Presi
dent, directed his attention to the fact that frauds were being perpetrated
here and elsewhere, the President suggests to him that idea, and acting upon
it the Secretary of the Treasury, under the direction of the President, issues
the order that the transfer be made."
Mr. Tutton had represented that on three hours' notice tne
distillers could get rid of all evidence of their frauds, but this
, order was giving them three weeks, and would defeat its own
object.
"Now, gentlemen of the jury, has not the time arrived when a little jus
tice may be done? For the first time throughout this trial, facts have been
told. You, gentlemen of the jury, are the first in all this country who have
known the exact truth, and there it is laid down clearly, plainly, unmisun-
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. 44!
derstandably before you. Does it not give to each one of you a profound
feeling of satisfaction that the whole truth of the matter removes every stain
or suspicion of guilt? Does it not make you feel prouder of yourselves and
of the great country in which you live, when you find that the highest offi
cial has the nerve to resist all the pressure which politicians may bring to
bear upon him ; but in the presence of the arguments addressed to him by
a plain and practical man, which he can not answer, he will surrender his
own long-settled, convictions, and bow to the irresistible logic which Tutton
suggested. He tells you in his own clear, incisive, sharp-cut language : ' I
directed the suspension of this order because I considered the good of the
public service demanded it.' Babcock had never said a word to him on
the subject. He had never opened his head to him with reference to this
order. But when Tutton comes — the" oldest official in the Revenue Service
of the United States, a man of the strictest and most incorruptible integrity,
of large and comprehensive knowledge of the whole subject — and lays the
matter plainly before the President, the President acts."
Quoting again from the President's deposition, he continued:
" Now, that is very plain reading. There are no flowers of speech about
it. I commend it, however, to your earnest and honest judgment, whether
it is not as absolute and perfect a vindication of the policy which the Pres
ident pursued as any rational human being could ask for. And yet he is
arraigned here, he has been arraigned by the counsel for the course which
he there pursued. I let the President speak for himself. There is no vigor
of denunciation enough, however largely they may be furnished of it on the
part of the counsel for the prosecution, to convince one single right-minded
man throughout this whole country that the action thus taken was not dic
tated by the highest and purest of motives. And yet watch the course that
the prosecution from the beginning has been pursuing. Week after week,
and month after month, such an unbroken flood of calumny, and detraction
and abuse, has been poured in upon the President, has been poured in upon
this defendant, because it was said that he interfered with the Secretary of
the Treasury and prevented him from carrying out a line of policy which he
had inaugurated for the purpose of detecting frauds in the city of St. Louis.
Finally, however, we get to the fact ; the course which the President pur
sued was not against the will of the Secretary of the Treasury ; the revoca
tion or suspension of the order was not averse to any scheme which the
Secretary of the Treasury entertained ; but, gentlemen of the jury, as the
evidence in this case shows, the President did precisely what the Secretary
of the Treasury was anxious he should do, the President was convinced
precisely as the Secretary of the Treasury was convinced. The
same arguments which reached the President and convinced him
reached the Secretary of the Treasury and convinced him. Before the Presi
dent had said 'Mr. Tutton, I agree with you,' the Secretary of the Treas
ury had said 'Mr. Tutton, I agree with you.' Is it not astonishing, in the
face of these facts, that through these long and dreadful months of pro
secution and persecution through which we have been compelled to pass,
442 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORRS.
no man has had the courage to stand up and say in the face of the country
precisely what the truth of this matter is? Isn't it melancholy to reflect that
down to the time when Mr. Tutton took the stand the real, God's truth of
the business had never been told? And yet, in the face of this very record,
the truth of which no man can gainsay or deny, counsel stand here and
tell you that the President interfered with the Secretary to thwart and
upset the design which he had formed for the purpose of punishing the
Whisky Ring in the city of St. Louis."
"There we stand, gentlemen, in the last act of this drama, so far as its
official aspects are concerned. It makes no earthly difference with us what
our political opinions may be. I believe in parties, in party organization,
and, to a certain extent, in party drill. But the eternal sense of eternal
justice is deeper than all the parties that ever existed on earth. I care
not what your political predilections may be, you can not look at that
record a single moment, and say that against the parties who were instru
mental in procuring the revocation of that order, there is spot or stain or
blemish of any kind. Thus triumphantly vindicated, the Executive head of
this great Nation, the President over your country and over mine, stands
completely exonerated. He has remained silent down to the very last
moment of time, and has only spoken when the law, whose majesty he
respects, required that he should speak. He becomes a witness, because
it was his duty. Thus he spoke. We could have brought him here,
secured here his personal attendance, but the exigencies of public affairs
and the necessity for his presence at the capital, induced us to waive
that, if possible, and produce to you his deposition. Taken under all
the forms of law, by consent of the counsel for the prosecution, before
the Chief Justice of the United States, this plain man has told his plain
story, and in his own plain way. There are no more flowers of rhetoric
in it than there are in Christ's Sermon on the Mount. It speaks straight
to the heart and judgment of every honest man in these United States.
He intended by it no rebuke, but what a rebuke it carries! He does
not stand there, before this whole country, as a witness, because he
volunteered to be such, but it was done because he did know the facts,
and he knew them all. Now, Tutton says, at the very close of his
testimony, speaking of his interview with Secretary Bristow: 'Yes, sir; he
only raised one objection, and then he fully acquiesced and agreed with
me that that was the better plan' — the plan which Tutton suggested. One
short hour before this interview was had with the President, the Secretary
of the Treasury fully acquiesced that this was the better plan."
How useless Babcock was to the ring was shown by Macdon-
ald's telegram to Commissioner Douglass after the order had
been promulgated.
"Suppose there had been a dispatch of that character sent to Babcock.
How full of declamation would this court-room have been. How splendid,
how vigorous would have been the vituperation which the counsel would
have employed. Ah, gentlemen of the jury, if a dispatch of that character
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. 443
would have been evidence of guilt if sent to Babcock, what do you say of
it as applied to Douglass? and yet no one questions the integrity of Doug
lass; no one has a right to question it. Facts do not change. Macdonald
in the same dispatch says, 'I don't like the order.' He says that to whom?
Babcock? No, no. Babcock is the most useless man in Washington, so
far as the purpose of Macdonald is concerned. He says it straight to head
quarters. 'I don't like the order.' Immediately upon its issuance, and after
the receipt of that dispatch, Douglass sent him the conciliatory telegram, in
which he says the order is general, and will be merely temporary in its
character. And Joyce, with that windy effusiveness so characteristic of
Joyce, sits himself down in «a quasi, humbug, military fashion, and says:
•We have official information that the enemy weakens — push things.' Push
what things? There is nothing left to push. Help to set aside the order?
It had been set aside. Argue with the President? He had never said a
word to him on the subject. Revoke the order of transfer? It had been
revoked. And because John A. Joyce was a natural-born poet, because he
would gush even at the expense of a dollar for ten words, because he sent
this utterly stupid and meaningless dispatch to Babcock — there being no law
that we are aware of to prevent him from making a fool of himself, — because
he sent that windy, declamatory and useless dispatch to General Babcock, to
which no earthly attention was paid, therefore General Babcock is guilty of
conspiring with Joyce to defraud the Government of the United States of the
Revenue tax of seventy cents per gallon on proof spirits, and for the pur
pose of carrying on this conspiracy, and aiding in the removal of high
wines without the payment of the Revenue tax thereon. What becomes of
logic in the presence of such a state of facts as that? It is buried.
Mr. Storrs closed with a crushing onslaught upon Everest and
his testimony. He reviewed the testimony of Everest with the
closest analytical scrutiny. He compared the evidence of Everest,
a confessed conspirator, with that of Magill, a man whose char
acter was unimpeached, and for whose veracity there were hun
dreds of old citizens ready to vouch. Then, speaking of the
admitted vagueness of Everest's testimony, so far as it concerned
the defendant, he drew an appalling picture of the consequences
that would hang over every citizen were such evidence to be
permitted to cast a man of heretofore high and honorable career
down in the dust of criminal degradation.
" But the case limped and staggered along under various stages of decrep
itude and decay, and, finally, the great sensation of the case arrived in
the person of Mr. Abijah M. Everest. Men rubbed their eyes and said :
'Where are we? Have human motives all been changed? We have
waited now six days. If General Babcock was really a party to this con
spiracy, why was he a party? What share did he have of the plunder?
What did he make by it? What earthly conceivable motive spurred him
444 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
to take in his hands and throw away, as if to throw it to the dogs, as
splendid a reputation as a young man ever achieved?' Joyce was here
in St. Louis — I would not use unnecessarily harsh words about him, but
the character of the man has been portrayed before you; a man infinite
in his resources of cheek and assurance, absolutely stupendous and almost
sublime in the magnificence of its proportions. He was the great corres
pondent. He would write letters to this man, that man and the other
man, and his letters always required an answer. And, floating around
grandly about St. Louis, he would approach these distillers from whom
he received corrupt moneys — and every distiller that happens to be pres
ent in this court-room will recognize the truth of the picture I draw — and,
holding out a letter, he would say: 'There, you see the influence I have
at the Executive Mansion ; you understand my rising relations with the
White House.' Lying to exalt his own reputation, constantly magnifying
his own consequence, and assuring all these men of the importance of
the position he occupied ; endeavoring by his own unassisted words to
impress upon them the idea that he had, at the White House somewhere,
some powerful, influential backing, which enabled him to guarantee those
distillers absolute immunity from detection and punishment for the frauds
in which they were engaged. This business Joyce pursued day after day,
and month after month. Unceasing in his devotion to the god of lying,
this trade he followed had neither 'variableness nor shadow of turning.'
But by and by the faith and credulity of the distillers weakened. His
calls for money were continuous and exacting. They substantially say to
him, 'Mr. Joyce, we must have some better evidence than your mere
word that you are strong in Washington' and thereupon, in order to show
them his strength in Washington, he takes the dispatch of the I3th of
December, and exhibits it to Bevis & Fraser. They had become alarmed.
Some evidence must be furnished the distillers that he has this influence at
Washington.
"Letters have been exhausted, telegrams have been used and failed, and,
therefore, he takes Abijah M. Everest, and goes through one of the most
stupendous farces ever enacted in the face of high heaven. He places
Everest in his room and takes two $500 bills and two open envelopes, con
spicuously displayed on the desk, shuffles them about, as a prestidigitator,
turning his back upon Everest, puts the money in his hand into one, jug
gles with the other, and goes through the wretched farce of sending
Everest down to the street letter-box to deposit those letters, watching him
from his window as he goes. Why was it? Simply for the purpose,
gentlemen of the jury, of enabling Everest to say to these distillers: 'Well,
Joyce has got some influence at Washington; Joyce to-day sent $500 to
Avery and $500 to Babcock.' Bevis is a little incredulous, and Fraser,
who is a good deal more incredulous, says: 'Now, Mr. Everest, that is
all very nice, but how do you know?' 'How do I know? Why because
Joyce sent me with the letters.' And for that purpose, that execrable farce
was enacted. Those letters might as well have been deposited on the
curbstone as in the place they were put. They were put in a letter-box,
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. 445
where cio sensible man, no man with sufficient intelligence to run an ordin
ary ink-stand would have placed them, and that was the only occasion that
Joyce ever did anything of the kind. And he watches his poor, weak,
shivering tool as he carries these letters and deposits them in the street
letter-box, watches until he sees him out of the way, selects his time (for
he knows when the carrier goes past there on his accustomed rounds),
stops him, describes the letters, takes them from his hand, and the whole
business is accomplished. He refuses to give a receipt ; says it is ' Hunky
Dory,' and goes off absolutely contented. Now, I have little to say about
the testimony of Everest. But there are some very extraordinary things
about it. He was put upon the stand after he had been a vagabond and
a self-made outlaw from his own country. With this great load of crimin
ality resting upon him, Everest had fled his home, and was a wandering
felon and a fugitive through all the cities of continental Europe ; and
through some mysterious way or other, for the ways ot this prosecution up
to this time have been 'inscrutable and past rinding out,' there did Mr.
Me Fall, another conspirator, find Everest, and brought back home the
acquisition. You heard the story which he told, and the reason of his
return. The press of the country filled with the astonishing developments
he was to make preceding him in his triumphal march into the City of St.
Louis, he comes here a self-convicted outlaw, and is entertained hke a
prince. Gentlemen, lying pays. A man whom the Government would not
trust with the inspection of a gallon of distilled spirits, in which the Gov
ernment had an interest of«only seventy cents, is brought all the way from
Rome; splendid avenues are opened before him, old friends attend him,
luxurious quarters are furnished him, his incomings and his outgoings are
watched and the great American eagle spreads its protecting wings over
this self-convicted outlaw, and the man not fit to be trusted with seventy
cents is authorized by the Government to stand up there, and with the
perspiration standing out upon his forehead to swear away the rights of
one of the best men on earth. Moreover, he tells you, that when he
came here he saw Mr. Dyer, and they had a careful and a prayerful
interview together. He said to Mr. Dyer, 'Now, Mr. Dyer, I didn't see
this money put into both envelopes, and I can't swear to it. It would be
well if I could remember it; but I can't remember anything of the kind.
I will go to the very farthest verge. I will say there has been no arrange
ment with me I have not been promised immunity ; I will say these
twelve indictments are liable to fall upon me ; I will stand up to the rack
like a man ; but, Mr; Dyer, excuse me, I can't say I saw the money put in
both envelopes.' Again the whole force, the stars and the stock company,
Colonel Dyer, Colonel Broadhead, Peddrick and the rest of them, surround
this man and brace him up and crowd him up, and again he says to
him : ' Mr. Dyer, I can't say I saw that money put in the envelope
addressed to General Babcock,' and yet that poor, weak man, for whom
I have no words of denunciation, but for whom I entertain the profound-
est feeling of pity, that poor, self-convicted felon, with his wife down here
shivering and trembling for him, is placed on the stand, and there, with
446 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
the gate of the Penitentiary opened broadly before him, they say to him,
' If you will escape years and years of a felon's life, swear to what we
want you to testify, and damn your very soul by saying you saw the money
put into the envelope;' and he did it. Gentlemen, it is simply awful. It
is shocking to the very last degree. The prayer which the Father of us
all taught his children first to utter is, ' Lead us not into temptation, but
deliver us from evil.' And here a powerful coercion, absolutely oppressive
and gigantic in its character, as if a mountain of pressure had been brought
to bear upon that poor, frail man, and, shaken by it, he swore, with the
knowledge that his poor, young, trembling, tearful wife was awaiting his
return home. He swore, with the terrible knowledge that this iron grip of
the law was ready to clasp him. Time after time, and again and again,
he had said he did not know, he could not say, that a dollar of money
had ever been paid to Babcock. Yet, by shaking the Penitentiary in his
face, he swore it. For the emergencies in this case seemed so great that
the soul of the man was absolutely damned in the presence of this audience
and the whole world, in order that an innocent man might be convicted.
We took him and subjected him to that severest of tests, a cross-
examination, which you remember, gentlemen of the jury, was kind to
the very last degree, and the poor soul weakened and failed of its pur
pose, and the majestic form of eternal truth rolled up before the day's
vision of - poor Everest. And he saw the magnitude of the execrable
act that he had committed and the enormity of the danger he was
about to inflict upon an innocent man, and the soul revolted at the
thought, and he says, 'So help me God I'll not do it,' and like a man,
finally he told the story. Wasn't that a true deliverance? What a
thrill would have rung through the whole country had he possessed
sufficient nerve to face the wrath of an outraged God, and said that
there is proof certain that General Babcock is a member of the conspiracy
because he has received guilty money ; but the same great God that
guided our fathers has watched over this young man, and with his very
finger he touched the lips of Everest, as he stood on the stand, and
enabled him to speak the truth. How, then, the fabric of this pr?>secu-
tion fell. How honest men raised themselves up and said, thank God
our faith in our common nature is again restored. He left the stand,
and the knell of the prosecution had been sounded, and its doom had
been fixed ; buried deeper than ever plummet sank ; covered over
with a mighty weight which truth had placed there. Let it rot in its
dishonorable grave."
But it was in the peroration that the speaker showed his grand
est powers. " As a mere literary effort," said the Globe-Demo
crat, " it cannot fail of having its effect on those who read. To
those who heard, it seemed a perfect revelation of the awful fate
that may, at any time, through heedless contact with apparently
honorable men, Fall on any one, even the most reputable. The
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. 447
picture and its suggestions moved everybody in Court, and even
the hitherto impassible jury — even the grave Court itself — showed
evident signs that the genius of the advocate had stirred them
to the depths of their hearts."
"And so, gentlemen, I have reached, I believe, the conclusion of all the
facts I have desired to discuss. I have stated nothing about the
character and reputation of my client. It was splendid, and he ought
to be proud of it, and he is proud of it, as given by those men who
have known him for years past. Men whom we all delight to honor have
come here and given him such a reputation as, I am sure, every man on
this jury prays that his son may in the future have. Spotless, without
stain or blemish ; gentlemen of the jury, we are proud of it. We give it to
you, trusting and feeling that it will be safe in your hands, and that you
will preserve it sacredly until this trial is altogether closed. I have no
consideration of mercy to appeal to, but this has been a long trial, a dreadful
trial, and never, since it has been my pleasure to appear in a court of justice,
have I felt so weighed down in my heart of hearts with so tremendous a respon
sibility as that which rests upon me to-day. It was but a few weeks ago
that I left Chicago, where my client lives, that I saw his family grouped
together, the children grouped in prayer around the mother's knee. I saw
the patient, calm courage of the poor wife, and to-day, it seems to me, that
the veil of distance that spreads between us is lifted, and I see her again
'in prayer, that her husband may return a vindicated man. I see the chil
dren of that man, as they gather again around the mother's knee, sending
forth the same sweet prayer, that their father may be saved. Let us take
our minds back over the long journey we have passed, and travel with the
defendant up to the time of his final acquittal, when the heart of the wife
shall be gladdened, the hearts of the children lifted up, when by a verdict
of his fellow-citizens he shall go back to his home, and shall walk the
streets of the city he has done so much to beautify, a thoroughly vindicated
man."
Judge Porter occupied the whole of the following day in argu
ment on behalf of the defendant. His speech, during the delivery
of which he had to make frequent and continual reference to his
notes, reads much better than it sounded. The first marked sen
sation he created was when he charged the counsel for the prose
cution, .Colonels Broadhead and Dyer, with having pursued
the defendant with a vindictiveness dictated by hostility
to the President, of whom he was Private Secretary. The motives
he attributed to these gentlemen for this course were that the
President's depositions stood as a bar in the way of their obtaining
another professional victory. "The speaker's denunciatory elo
quence," said the same paper, "was again and again directed
44$ LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
against the whole fraternity of the press, in such powerful language
that every newspaper reporter present felt almost guilty of a large
degree of criminality, although, be it said, it is only through the
agency of these very men that Judge Porter can speak to the
forty millions of American citizens to whom he constantly avowed
he was speaking."
He characterized the prosecution as in reality a covert attack
upon the President.
" In view of the relations of General Babcock to President Grant the prose
cution seemed to be impressed with the utter improbability of the truth of
such an accusation without the privity of the President. Hence, like some
of the more violent of the newspapers, though they did not venture to assert,
they did not hesitate to insinuate by innuendo that the President himself
was privy to the conspiracy. These covert insinuations should be brought
out from their hiding-places ; let us meet them face to face. President Grant
either was or was not privy to the St. Louis conspiracy. If he was, it should
be proved. Can anything be more absurdly grotesque than such an impu
tation? The President of the United States conspiring against his own
administration. Violating his official oath and confederating with a gang of
thieves to -defeat the collection of the public revenue! What is the tempta
tion?
"Why, they would have us believe that it was to enable the distillers and
corrupt officers of St. Louis to steal a million of the public money. Who
for ? For the President ? No. Half of it for themselves, a quarter of the
residue for the gangers and store-keepers, and one-fifth of the remaining
residue to Fitzroy, to Everest, to Macdonald and to Joyce ; and all this in
the hope, the faint and bare hope, that these bribed officers might have
grace and conscience enough once in three years to send #500 to his Private
Secretary, which could be divided between President Grant and his Secre
tary, and in the earnest confidence that these men could secure to him that
$250 and not tell of it. They would have you believe, if insinuation would
do it, that with knowledge of his own and General Babcock' s guilt, he
directed the prosecution of his St. Louis confederates in crime, with the per
emptory injunction to the department of the Government charged with the
prosecution, to let no guilty man escape ; they would have you believe that
the 'President, from whom Colonel Dyer received the appointment he has so
honorably graced, by whose direction Colonel Broadhead stands here to-day
as the representative of the Government — that General Grant was himself
privy to the conspiracy because he swears to facts within his knowledge, to
protect an innocent man and a member of his own household against an
infamous accusation. Who is it that is thus maligned? What are his
antecedents? His life is an open book. The name of General Grant has been
the subject of much criticism and of much calumny, but it stands even to
day unstained with the imputation of personal dishonor. He has made his
name historic. He stands now in the judgment of Europe the foremost
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. 449
representative of American character ; he will stand in all aftertirae, in the
judgment of mankind, among the foremost men of the nineteenth century.
What honest man, friend or enemy, believes or dares to countenance the
impeachment of his integrity on the charge of personal meanness, baseness,
crime and dishonor? If General Lee was to-day among the living, who more
promptly than he would brand the infamous calumny with burning and con
temptuous scorn? What private in the Union army — what manly and chiv
alrous son of the South, who fought as long as the State flag fluttered — what
one of them all but would resent such an imputation, in the one case upon
an honored leader, in the other upon an honored enemy ? We are a free
people ; we are bold and fearless partisans ; we deal hard blows in fair fight,
but there is a manhood in the American people which abhors mean calumn
ies and scorns alike the coward and the bravo who strike below the belt.
I do not reproach the government counsel with intentional wrong, but I
submit to them whether it is a professional device which, even in their zeal
to blast the good name of this defendant, is worthy of their position and
reputation. They were driven to this expedient by the necessities of a scut
tled and sinking prosecution. Gentlemen, if General Grant were not a party
to this conspiracy, if he were not privy to its existence, you see, as the pro
secution see, how utterly improbable it is that General Babcock was one of
their confederates. No one will charge him with infidelity to his Chief.
What would be the measure of General Babcock's infamy if, in his relations
to the President, he had been capable of betraying his trust? What would
have been the depth of his degradation if, after being educated at the expense
of his country at WTest Point, after being honored in peace and in war in
the public service, and still holding his commission in the Army, he had
been capable of selling the Government to thieves and dividing with them
the price of his own degradation in crime ? Gentlemen, in the light of the
evidence, the Prosecuting Attorney can not believe it. No honest man, after
reading this testimony, can believe it."
In referring to the value of character in relation to evidence of
guilt, Judge Porter rose to real grandeur of eloquence. He
demanded, in the most impressive manner, to know whether a
life-time spent without reproach, and in the most honorable ser
vice of the country, was not to be considered as worth something
in itself as a rebuttal of the evidence of convicted or confessed
thieves, and appealed to the common experience of mankind to
decide what would be the possible value of a career of integrity
to any man, if his honor could be blasted and his name polluted
by the interested testimony of known perjurers and conspirators.
This was, probably, the most effective part of the whole argu
ment, and was listened to with the closest attention by the jury.
"An adverse verdict, I confess, might for the moment gratify the per
sonal enemies of the President, but these hostilities are but temporary.
29
45O LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
Such a verdict, after the excitement of the hour has passed away, would
be condemned by your own sense of justice, and by the enlightened judg
ment of mankind. It would gratify no personal enemy of General Babcock,
for he has not one this day on the face of the earth, not even my friend,
the Prosecuting Attorney. It is upon others entirely, and not upon him,
that the blow is given. A gallant and manly soldier during the war ;
a Northern man, he was true to his State, and fought for the Northern
cause. When the war closed he was, as he has been from that hour to
this, one of those whose constant voice, whose utmost influence, have
been against bitterness and strife, and in favor of conciliation, union and
harmony. Among the warmest friends to-day who rally around him are
gallant and distinguished soldiers in the Southern army, from whom, during
this trial, we receive assurances of their unswerving confidence in his integ
rity and their earnest and hearty sympathy. What they assure us we believe,
and that is that a Missouri jury will never permit an innocent man to be
wronged. You would not do it if he were your enemy ; much less would you do
it to one whose character is unstained by dishonor, and who never consciously
betrayed an earthly trust or wronged a human being. You see by the
deposition of the President why he, who knows him better than any living
man, has the most clear and absolute conviction of his innocence. In the
darkest' days and nights of the civil war they slept in the same tent, shared
together the same rations with the private in the ranks, rode side by side
by night and by day, on the line of the rifle-pits and in the presence of death ;
rode side by side in the hour of battle, in front of the cannonade. When,
after the elevation of General Grant to the Presidency, and of all the men
he knew and trusted among these 40,000,000 of Americans, he — no blind
judge of men, not inexperienced in affairs — selected that young man as
his faithful, trusted and confidential Secretary, and to this hour holds
him to his heart as a man he has proved in peace and in peril, under
all circumstances, and in whose innocence he declares, in the presence
of this tribunal, in the presence of the jury, and in the presence of
that God where there is no distinction between the humblest persons of
mankind."
The scope of the argument, however, was mainly a general
review of that which his predecessor, Mr. Storrs, had analyzed in
detail. The object of the speaker was, evidently, to give a
rounded picture of the whole course of the trial and the evidence
and arguments. He sought to show up the motives of the pros
ecution, and to convince his hearers, mainly by reference to the
general principles that govern human action, rather than by care
ful analysis of the several points as they have successively
appeared in the case.
His characterization of Joyce as "the Mephistopheles of the
gang," was a scathing word-picture, well worth recalling were
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. 45 I
there room for it in this mere outline of the case. He showed
how Joyce had abused General Babcock's confidence and mis
used his name all along, and made a strong point against the
Government by reminding the jury that, although they had proved
that information from Washington came to the ring through
Avery, they had never attempted to show the slightest collusion
between Babcock and Avery. The word " Sylph," he said, had
been ignorantly applied by Joyce to a woman weighing three
hundred pounds, and Babcock, who had been amused by the blun
der, in mere badinage had adopted it as the signature to one of
his telegrams to Joyce. And that was all the significance there
was to the mysterious word which had puzzled prosecution and
press so long. He closed with an earnest appeal to the jury to
do justice to the defendant.
"Gentlemen, it is a grave matter to this defendant that he has been com
pelled to stand here to be gazed at as an accused criminal. You know
how you would feel if, among strangers, you were subject to such an ordeal
for two long weeks, day after day, as the alleged confederate of conspira
tors and thieves. But, gentlemen, we feel that, notwithstanding all the great
burdens of his accusation, notwithstanding the enormous expense which it
entails upon us, notwithstanding that we claim to have been unjustly
accused, when the defendant leaves this Court we shall be happy to find
that though he leaves it poor in worldly goods, he leaves it rich in the
consciousness of his rectitude and in the indorsement which you will give him
in vindication of his honor and his innocence. It may still happen, gentle
men, that, until the grand Assize at which we shall all be arraigned as
defendants, you will never look upon the pallid, anxious face of the noble
and devoted wife, who, with trembling heart, is looking to you for the
deliverance of her wronged husband. It may happen that the little circle
of children who look to you for the return of their father untouched by the
flame, may never have an opportunity of expressing to you their gratitude ; but
you know, strangers as they are to you, your names will be written indel
ibly on their young hearts, and I may venture to say that, when you return
to your own homes, where bright eyes and beaming smiles await you, the
thought that you have vindicated an innocent man will rejoice those young
hearts, who will feel that their father was instrumental in protecting a
stranger from wrong and in sending joy into his household when you were
asked to drown it with ignominy and shame. Your verdict of vindication
will secure our common country from an enduring imputation of base
dishonor. Your verdict is waited for by every citizen of the American
Union, and by every country in Europe, as that of an American jury on
the honor of the American people."
General Dyer occupied an entire day in his closing argument for
452 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
the prosecution, and on Thursday, the 24th of February, Judge
Dillon delivered a carefully prepared charge to the jury. The
reading of the charge was listened to with eager attention by all
present, — counsel, auditors, and jury; — and was made particularly
impressive by the grave, clear elocution of the Judge, whose
emphasis added to the force of the words themselves, and stamped
their meaning most vividly on the minds of all. The evidence,
both documentary and oral, was marshalled in logical sequence,
and a complete history given of all the acts of the defendant and the
conspirators as shown in evidence, which bore any relation to the
case. "Assuming," he said, "that you will find the existence of
the conspiracy between Joyce and the distillers and others, your
inquiry will be narrowed down to a single ultimate question of
fact, namely, was the defendant one of the conspirators, — a fellow
conspirator with Joyce and the distillers named in the indictment?
The Government affirms it, and must prove it by legal and
satisfactory evidence, in order to ask a verdict in its favor. No
witness has been introduced who has testified that the defendant
was ever informed or knew of the conspiracy, or that he ever
admitted his knowledge of it, or his participation in it. No writ
ing signed by the defendant has been produced which in direct
or express terms shows such guilty knowledge and participation
on his part. But the law does not require direct proof of these
facts, but they may be proved by facts and circumstances which
show them beyond a reasonable doubt.'' The charge was through
out clear, judicial, and impartial, but the general impression it
left upon all who heard it was strongly in favor of the defendant.
IIL
THE VERDICT.
THE JURY FIND THE DEFENDANT NOT GUILTY— AN OVATION TO GENERAL
BABCOCK AND MR. STORRS — THE GENERAL SERENADED — SPEECH OF MR.
STORRS — SENATOR HOWE'S OPINION OF THE CASE.
AT the close of the charge, the Court took a recess until
three o'clock, and in half an hour from that time the
jury were ready with their verdict. Throughout the trial, Gen
eral Babcock had borne himself like a gallant gentleman, con
scious of his own innocence, and waiting with patience for the
law and the evidence to establish it beyond a doubt. The scene
that followed upon the announcement of the verdict is thus
described by the Globe-Democrat: — "The Court then asked the
usual question, as to whether they had determined on a verdict,
and was responded to by a silent bow from the entire jury,
as the foreman "handed up the all-important document. At this
point the sensation of suspense was simply painful, and men's
faces shone ghastly white all over the court-room. This feeling
was intensified by a slight hesitation the Clerk made in the
reading. He read: 'We, the jury, find the defendant — not
guilty.'
"No sooner were these last words uttered than a scene of
confusion that baffles description ensued. General Babcock's
hands were seized and shaken by everybody who could get within
reach of him, Judge Porter being the first in his congratulations.
The crowd in the rear burst out into a hearty shout of applause,
hand-clapping and all other forms of enthusiastic expression of
joy were heard, and for a moment the scene rather resembled
the pit of a theater than a grave and decorous court of justice.
The Judges very wisely overlooked this very natural ebullition,
and in a few moments the crowd recovered its self-possession.
453
454 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
Judge Chester H. Krum then rose and asked that the defendant
be discharged, and, on that order being made, and after the
order for the discharge of the jury, General Babcock and Judge
Porter stepped forward and shook hands with each juryman as
they filed out, thanking each personally for the steady attention
they had given to the case, and the manly manner in which
each had done his duty. It is hardly possible to tell which of
these two gentlemen showed the greater emotion under the cir
cumstances. The eyes of both were wet with tears of joy, and
the voices of both trembled as they endeavored to utter their
gratitude. Mr. Storrs stepped across the court-room to 'shake his
client by the hand, looking calm and passionless, but out of his
eyes there shone a light of triumph as of a victor surveying the
field where he has but just conquered in a great fight."
It was learned that a unanimous vote for acquittal was the
result of the first informal ballot, in the jury-room, and was con
firmed by the formal ballot which was next taken. The news
of the verdict reached the street and sped over the business part
of the city with the rapidity of lightning. An immense multitude
of congratulating citizens escorted General Babcock and his
counsel to their hotel. Telegrams flo\ved in from Washington
and other cities expressing the joy of sympathizing friends over
his deliverance. Leading citizens of St. Louis called at the
Lindell House to shake hands with the man whom a few' weeks
before they were all anxious to send to the penitentiary. A
deputation of colored citizens called to express their thankfulness
at the result; and in the evening he was serenaded, a large con
course of Missourians, in open carriages, assembling in front of
the hotel to demonstrate their rejoicing. Colonel Hatch, a Con
federate soldier, made a cordial speech, in the course of which
he said:
"The General and I have differed in the past — we differed fundamentally
— but we submitted the decision to the tribunal of war. The god of battles
was the judge, and the course which General Babcock took in that war,
and no less as a soldier and a citizen since, toward the people of the South
has been such that we could all admire. [Applause.] I appear here
to-night, in your behalf, to extend my congratulations to him. During that
war, under the aegis of the white flag of peace, he endeavored to stop the
mighty effusion of blood. And he knew that no people on the face of the
earth would give him a more cordial welcome than the people of Missouri.
Let me say to you and your friends that no greater mistake was ever made
THE TRIAL OF GENERAL BABCOCK. 455
than when the public press uttered the sentiment that there was a rebel
feeling in the State of Missouri that would strike down General Babcock in
the hour of his peril before this tribunal. Let me say to you that no Con
federate ever struck down a man in trouble, manacled or a prisoner.
[Applause.] We struck them breast to breast, face to face, but we never
yet struck a fallen foe or a fallen friend. [Applause.] But let the public
sentiment be what it may, there is one thing certain. Let the wild wave of
public ^sentiment in this intense excitement say what it may, your minds
always bow to the tribunal of public justice, and neither the howlings of
public prejudice nor the shafts of personal malice can ever leave a stain
upon the high character of the Missouri Court before which you were
tried. The wave of public sentiment may battle against that in voice,
but the Court will stand the test, whatever it be.
And now, General Babcock [looking toward the General], these friends
have come, not to flatter you, not to say flattering words upon this
occasion, but to give you the cordial hand of friendship, and give you
their hearty and sincere congratulations for your acquittal before a
Missouri jury."
The band played " Dixie," and then General Babcock, his
voice broken by emotion, acknowledged the honors paid him,
but delegated to Mr. Storrs the task of making a fitting reply.
Mr. Storrs said he had never entertained the slightest doubt
that the defendant would receive from a Missouri jury, in this,
the great metropolis of the Southwest, anything but a fair and
impartial trial. [Cries of "good," and applause.] And the gen
tlemen of the press, who surrounded him, would do him the
justice to say that from the first moment of his arrival here, he
never for a moment entertained any apprehension that from this
great, broad, noble hearted people, he would receive anything but an
ample vindication, anything but a triumphant acquittal. [Applause.]
The result had justified their anticipations, and they felt now
nothing but a sense of prayerful thankfulness at the verdict which
had been rendered to-day. They had had demonstrated to them
the sense of eternal justice as limited to no party and to no class
of men — that we are all one people and one nationality.
[Applause.]
Judge Krum added a few words, and so ended one of the
most remarkable scenes, appropriately closing one of the most
notable trials, that have ever been held in the history of the
United States.
Two years after these events, after General Grant had returned
to private life, and the ambitions which had prompted this pros-
456 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
ecution of his Private Secretary were dead and buried beyond
hope of resurrection, a pamphleteer of the Democratic party,
George W. Julian of Indiana, wrote an article in the March
number of the North American Review for 1878, attacking
Grant's administration, and particularly singling out General Bab-
cock as an example of official corruption. To this article Mr.
Storrs had intended to write a reply, and in a letter to a New
York friend on the subject he said, — "All that portion of the
article which relates to the Babcock case I know to be false, and
presume the balance is." It does not appear that Mr. Storrs
ever carried out his intention, which perhaps was owing to the
fact that in the June number of the same magazine Senator
Howe of Wisconsin took up Julian's points and effectually
demolished them. In this article Mr. Howe said:
" In the annals of criminal jurisprudence, there is perhaps not
another case where an individual was subjected to so terrible an
ordeal as was Orville E. Babcocls at St. Louis. There is no
probability that he would ever have been accused of crime if he
had* not held confidential relations with President Grant. But
the brutal appetite for smirching the President could not
be resisted. The lure was too dazzling. He was accused.
He was dragged to a distant and a strange city for trial.
That there might be no possible lack of zeal in the prose
cution, special counsel was employed for the purpose. The
counsel selected stood in the front rank of his profession. He
stood high in the confidence and regard of the Democratic party.
He was inspired by the assurance of large fees, and by the sug
gestion of the highest political honors. Never did an advocate
appear at the bar under so many spurs to effort. We do not
need to suggest that all these incentives impelled General Broad-
head to go beyond his duty. We do mean to say that they were
ample securities, if any were needed, against his falling short of
his duty.
" One great party, and part of the other, clamored for convic
tion until candid men sickened at the spectacle. It was not to
punish Babcock, it was to disgrace Grant. After all, Babcock was
acquitted ; and after all, Julian reiterates the charge of his guilt,
and ascribes his acquittal to Grant's friendship, — the very circum
stance which provoked his prosecution."
CHAPTER XXIIL
THE CHICAGO WHISKY RING.
HISTORY OF THE CHICAGO SEIZURES— THE "FIRST BATCH" INFORM ON THE
"SECOND BATCH," AND ARE GRANTED ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY — JACOB REHM,
THE ORGANIZER OF THE CHICAGO RING, BECOMES THE LEADING INFORMER
—INDICTMENT OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY, AND OTHER GOVERNMENT
OFFICIALS, ON HIS INFORMATION — PUBLIC ASTONISHMENT — DISCREDITABLE
COURSE OF THE GOVERNMENT ATTORNEYS — TRIAL OF RUSH AND PAHLMAN —
MR. STORRS' ARGUMENT FOR THE DEFENSE — CRUSHING DENUNCIATION OF
THE GOVERNMENT WITNESSES— THE GOVERNMENT COUNSEL ALSO COME IN
FOR A FLAYING — ALTERCATION BETWEEN MR. STORRS AND THE COURT —
CHICAGO "SEWER POLITICIANS" — TRIAL OF SUPERVISOR MUNN — THE
JURY REFUSE TO BELIEVE REHM, AND MUNN IS ACQUITTED— DISMISSAL OF
THE OTHER INDICTMENTS — LETTER OF MR. STORRS TO PRESIDENT GRANT
— COMMENTS OF THE LOCAL PRESS — EFFORTS TO IMPLICATE SENATOR
LOGAN, CONGRESSMAN FARWELL, AND THE CHICAGO POSTMASTER — MR.
STORRS APPOINTED SPECIAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY— BRINGS SUIT AGAINST
REHM FOR CIVIL PENALTIES — THE SUIT DISMISSED — JUDGE DRUMMOND's
OPINION.
PROSECUTIONS similar to those at St. Louis were com
menced in Chicago, but although there existed a ring in
that city whose peculations had been quite as enormous as those
of the St. Louis ring, the result of the Chicago prosecutions was
not creditable to the government officers who had them in
charge. The first seizures in Chicago were made in May 1875,
and grew out of investigations conducted by Messrs. Tutton,
Brooks, and Elmer Washburn. The Honorable Jasper D. Ward
was at that time United States District Attorney, and under his
administration indictments were found against twenty-three dis
tillers and rectifiers, fifteen gaugers, and six storekeepers, while
two gaugers and two storekeepers, who were afterwards used by
the government as witnesses, and testified to their own frauds
457
LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
and perjuries while implicating others, never were indicted at all.
There never seems to have been an honest purpose to convict
these men. Several of them were invited back from Canada,
whither they had fled, and promised immunity if they would
testify against others who had been guilty of the like fraudulent
practices. These constituted the "first batch."
To these men the prosecuting officers of the government offered
absolute immunity provided they would testify (or " squeal," as
the newspapers called it) against ten other distillers, whose offences
were so slight and trifling as to become insignificant in compari
son with the frauds of which the "first batch," had been guilty.
The evidence against the "first batch," as shown by the revenue
officers who made the seizures, was complete, and absolutely
sufficient to have procured their conviction. But the government
saw fit to permit these men to go virtually unpunished, and to
visit the penalties of the law exclusively upon the "second batch,"
for reasons which have never been satisfactorily explained.
The organizer of the Chicago whisky ring was Jacob Rehm,
who had been for the preceding fifteen years most potential in
the local politics of the city and county. In order to secure
evidence against Rehm, which it was supposed the fifty-odd men
comprising the "first batch" could give, they were all very
liberally excused on condition of their giving the necessary testi
mony. Such wholesale traffic in immunity was never known in
the history of the criminal jurisprudence of this or any other
country. The precedent having been set, Rehm at once followed
it, and in order to secure his own exemption from punishment
he implicated Mr. Ward, the District Attorney; Mr. Wadsworth,
the Collector; and Mr. Munn, the Supervisor of Internal Revenue.
Such a bold bid for safety surely never was made and accepted
before. Notwithstanding the fact that Rehm was the founder and
organizer of the conspiracy, and had received from it nearly half
a million dollars, — notwithstanding that he had made the legiti
mate distillation of spirits in the city of Chicago a practical
impossibility, — Mr. Dexter, one of the special counsel engaged by
the Government to assist in the prosecution, stated in Court that
he was authorized by Secretary Bristow to accept Rehm's testi
mony, even at the cost of absolute immunity, if it could not
otherwise be obtained.
THE CHICAGO WHISKY RING. 459
The whole public of Chicago were astonished when Jacob
Rehm, the organizer of this scheme of fraud against the govern
ment in Chicago, joined hands with the government, and seemed
at least to be acting in co-operation with it, and under its pro
tection. On the testimony of Rehm, indictments were found
against Munn, Ward, and Wadsworth. Mr. Ward was removed from
his office, and succeeded by Judge Bangs. The charge made against
Mr. Ward that he had an interest in one of the distilleries, when
investigated, was shown to be false. But it served as a pretext
for his indictment and removal, it being clear that he could not
be used for the purpose of indicting prominent and respectable
men without evidence, and relying upon the testimony of charac
terless vagabonds, thereafter to be procured, to convict them. Mr.
WTadsworth also stood in the way; and although Tutton had
spoken most flatteringly of him to the Department, he was
removed.
The "second batch," very naturally, sought to follow the exam
ple of the first, and make terms with the government. They
sent a deputation to District Attorney Bangs, and a consultation
was held at his office with him and the other government coun
sel, at which it was agreed by all except the firm of Rush and
Pahlman that they should plead guilty to two counts in the indict
ments, and withdraw their opposition to the condemnation of
their property. The prosecuting attorneys, on their part, prom
ised that all the members of the "second batch" should be treated
alike, and that the judge would probably pass a nominal sen
tence. The main object was to avoid a trial, and therefore after
much negotiation these pleas were accepted. The arrangement
was carried out to the letter by the distillers, but not by the
government attorneys, who on sentence day made speeches in
favor of severe sentence, and also, as shown by the affidavits of
the distillers of the "second batch," sent a man to the distilleries
to bid up the property to a point that suited them before any
body else was allowed to bid. Instead of being all treated alike,
some of them received exceptionally severe sentences, — those
singled out for special punishment being men like Mr. A. C.
Hesing, who had discredited the testimony of Rehm, the principal
government witness in one only of the two trials which were all
that were ever had as the result of over sixty indictments.
460 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORRS.
Rush and Pahlman having refused to plead guilty and turn
State's evidence, they were placed upon trial, and the whole
strength of the first band seized in Chicago was brought against
them. Mr. Storrs had just returned from St. Louis, where he
had been defending General Babcock, and he was at once
retained to defend them.
In a letter addressed to President Grant Mr. Storrs reviewed
this case, and it is best described in his own words:
" It was really a case where Rush and Pahlman were compelled to
expose the frauds practised upon the revenue, and the government
officials were compelled to defend the integrity of those who had been
most largely engaged in the perpetration of 'such frauds. Yet it was with
the greatest difficulty that a conviction could be secured even in this
case, although there were about seventeen witnesses against the defend
ants, the jury absolutely refusing to credit the uncorroborated testimony
of these accomplices, and reaching their conclusion simply upon the test
imony of two witnesses who had not turned States' evidence, and who
were not active participants in the frauds concerning which they testified."'
The case was tried in March, 1876, and on the day when Mr.
Storrs made his closing argument for the defence, there was an
unusually large crowd assembled in the court-room. A Chicago
paper thus describes the scene :
"It had been anticipated that when Mr. Storrs should begin his speech
a regular field-day would be inaugurated, and that gentleman's forensic
ability and the knowledge that he had a good deal to say, and that
he would say it all, was reason enough for the jam. On the bench with
Judge Blodgctt were the Rev. Dr. Tiffany and the Hon. Alonzo Hunting-
ton, and in front of them were many members of the bar. Judge Bangs
occupied the seat which he has so seldom left during the past six days'
sessions, and in front of him was a big bundle of papers and books. Mr.
Ayers, the only other member of the governmental squad present, sat at the
Judge's left, with his overcoat thrown across his shoulders and pulled up
about his neck. Mr. Pahlman sat among the ranks of his prosecutors, and
near him Mrs. Pahlman was seated, soberly habited in a blue and black
striped mattellaise walking dress. Dr. Rush occupied his old position. The
general character of the assemblage of mere listeners was very good, but
there were some of the 'squealers' present.
"Mr. Storrs was busy at a table preparing the books and documents he
Mas to use during the argument, and was ready for his share of the work
when the court told him to proceed. He began in a very low voice, but
gradually warmed to his work. The little rencontre between the speaker
and the court, in the first part of the argument, had the effect to start all
of the counsel's energies and faculties into vigorous action. Every now and
then he would spear the government counsel so severely that they would
THE CHICAGO WHISKY RING. 461
call upon the court for protection, but every time they did so they were
met half-way by the speaker.
"The 'noble band of squealers' must have felt rather uncomfortable,
and the witnesses who had been used by the prosecution, and who were
present, must have been obliged to exert all their self-control to prevent
them fleeing the room. Mr. Storrs stood close to the rail in front of
the jury-box, and as he proceeded with the argument his voice rang out
clear and loud, so that the unfortunate and late comers who were obliged
to remain in the outside hall could hear every word he uttered. In his
denunciation of the squealers and the witnesses who, as he said, had
lied for the government, he was bitter and caustic. His sarcasm and
invective were sharp and keen as a razor's edge, cutting clear to the
bone and leaving no ragged edge, and the well-rounded periods marked
and emphasized with his extended index finger, which seemed to carry
the point of the argument with it."
At the outset, he referred to the course pursued by the Gov
ernment in trading with witnesses, as follows:
" Has there been, with two single exceptions, a single witness brought
upon the stand on behalf of the government who has not been, by his
own confession, not only a plunderer of the public funds and a conniver
at the plundering, but a perjurer as well? I stated to you, gentlemen
of the jury, in the opening that these men were, one and all, perjurers,
not because I called them perjurers, but because before the case had
finished they would be compelled to proclaim themselves as perjurers.
Was my opinion, gentlemen of the jury, true or false? You have heard
the testimony. I told you that the case was most remarkable, and would
be in that respect unique.
" I challenge all your past experiences and all your former reading as
a verification of that statement. Have you ever before been present,
gentlemen of the jury, in a court of justice where men of unblemished
reputation and spotless character have been placed upon trial by a gov
ernment whose first duty is the protection of the citizen, and their con
viction demanded upon the testimony of men so morally rotten that the
English language supplies no epithets sufficiently forcible fittingly to
characterize them? Is it my fault that it is so? And is such a char
acterization of the witnesses who have been day by day trailed before
you, and have fouled this court by their presence, is such a characteri
zation wild extravagance? If I should call the course which the govern
ment has pursued in seeking the conviction of men of good character
upon such testimony as utterly and indescribably infamous, would that
be a wild exaggeration? Challenge all your past history, recur to all
that you have read, refresh your recollections, if you please, by the
experience of all the past, and I tell you, gentlemen of the jury, from
the earliest periods of savagery down to to-day no single instance has
been recorded in any history, sacred or profane, where from ten to fif
teen witnesses who shamelessly proclaimed their own guilt and announced
462 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
their own perjury have been placed upon the stand for the conviction of
the citizen.
"It is because this most extraordinary course has been pursued — a
course absolutely without a parallel anywhere in the history of this
world ; it is because this course has been pursued by the government,
which is your protector and mine, and which should be in the time of
calamity and trouble the protector and defender of these defendants, that
there is a deep-seated feeling of outrage running through all this com
munity of which this vast audience here to-day is merely the exponent.
No man, gentlemen of the jury, feels himself safe ; and this trial had
not proceeded twelve hours before Rush and Pahlman drifted clean out
of sight and were forgotten. The great issue, as I knew it would be.
gradually loomed up in all its fearful and tremendous proportions before
the people, and they ask themselves this question : Has it come to this,
that the government shall trade with scoundrels : that it shall bargain
with them; that it shall buy them; and after having made the purchase,
that it shall put them upon the stand and under the sacred solemnities
of an oath in the almost divine presence of the court?"
Then followed a scene which recalled the intrepid manner in
which me great Lord Erskine, upon whom Mr. Storrs was wont
to model himself, maintained his ground against the hostile atti
tude of the Court :
"THE COURT — 'Mr. Storrs, there is no evidence here that the gov
ernment has traded with the witnesses — none whatever, with the exception
of Becker, and that was simply to give him safe conduct.'
"MR. STORRS — ' I propose, if the court please, and with your Honor's
permission, and I think I have the right, to flatly deny the charge which
Mr. Boutelle has made here, and which I know is untrue.'
"THE COURT— ' I say there is no evidence.'
"MR. STORRS — 'There is evidence.'
"THE COURT — 'No, sir.'
"MR. STORRS — 'There is evidence of trading.'
"THE COURT — 'I shall not allow you to assume that there is evidence.'
" MR. STORRS — ' I will read it to the jury, and the jury will judge of
the fact.'
"THE COURT — 'No, sir.'
"MR. STORRS — 'I will read it to the jury.'
"THE COURT — 'There is no evidence upon that point.'
"MR. STORRS — 'Gentlemen of the jury, that immunity has been promised
these witnesses is a fact established by the evidence ; that they are here
under the promise of immunity is another fact, and that there are wit
nesses here and have been upon this stand —
"THE COURT — 'Mr. Storrs, I shall not permit you to go on and make
such statements.'
" MR. STORRS — ' I shall read it, sir, from the testimony of Ford.'
"THE COURT — 'There is no such statement in the testimony of Mr.
Ford.'
THE CHICAGO WHISKY RING. 463
"MR. STORKS — 'Well, sir, I will come to that presently, and I will read
Mr. Ford's testimony. It is flat and unmistakable. And there, sir, it
comes to this, it must be a question between your Honor's recollection and tke
short-hand reporters' notes.'
"THE COURT — 'Let us understand each other distinctly now. You have
a right fully ta comment upon the motives and influences which may have
affected the witnesses in their testimony, and the effect which their testi
mony will have upon the charges pending against them : but that there was
any evidence of an agreement between them and the officers of govern
ment in reference to immunity the record is entirely bare.'
"Mr. Storrs — 'I will read the record if your Honor please, without stop
ping to contradict your Honor now or to discuss the question. I will
read the record when I come to it, and then the jury must judge. With
out, then, drawing my own inferences, gentlemen of the jury, which it
seems that it is improper for me to do — or the court deems it improper —
I will say this, and you can draw your own inferences, that from ten
to fifteen who were guilty of crimes by their own confessions have been
used by the government; that some of these men guilty of these crimes
are unindicted to-day. What do you call that? Is it immunity? That their
crimes were proclaimed as long ago as last January, and that yet they are
untouched! Is that immunity? That one of these criminals and one of
the leading witnesses in this case, is unindicted and still is the holder of
governmental position. Is that immunity ?
"Gentlemen of the jury, you are the judges of the facts. There are
the facts. Draw your inferences. Has Marshall P. Beecher received
immunity? Whether he has been promised it or not, hasn't he got it?
When he was appointed ganger, by his own testimony he was a thieC?
By his own declarations he has been so ever since he was appointed.
Added to this there are a series of perjuries which he shamelessly
admits. He is unindicted ; and he to-day holds the commission that he
has soiled. Gentlemen of the jury, \vhat do you call it? I care not
what words you select to characterize it? Why is it that he has not
been indicted ? Is it because in the hurry of business it has been for
gotten? Is it because the case of so conspicuous a scoundrel has been
overlooked ? Drawr your own inferences, gentlemen of the jury. There
are the facts ; call it immunity or whatever you please. Has he escaped
indictment because somebody representing the government has promised
that he should escape it? I care not that the man upon the stand
swears that no immunity has been promised him. He has got it ; and
it is simply an insult to the understanding of any man to say that it is an
accident that Marshall P. Beecher is not to-day in Joliet, where he
belongs. I pass this question of immunity for the present, because before
I have finished I will read to you the testimony ; and, gentlemen of the
jury, of that testimony you are to judge.
"The learned counsel for the government who has addressed you went
away out of his way and outside of the record for the purpose of sing
ing the praises of the Secretary of the Treasury.
464 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
"I have no discussion to make with the Secretary of the Treasury.
Possibly Mr. Boutelle deemed that he was on trial. If so, if he were,
and if he is the engineer of this scheme (I do not say that he is); if
it is through the Secretary of the Treasury that this spectacle has been
presented, he will be convicted if he is on trial ; and there is not a
jury that can be raked up in this State that would acquit him. All that
portion of Mr. Boutelle' s speech was a stump speech, and none the less
objectionable because it was a poor one. Mr. Boutelle undertook to tell
you from what he said was his own knowledge as to the understandings
with these men ; clearly outside of the record, and as clearly, as I will
show you, false from the testimony in the case.
" Many years ago it was recommended by some one who had wit
nessed curious proceedings in courts of justice that witnesses be elected
by the people. The plan is unnecessary. It seems they are appointed
by the government. Discharged from office because they are unfit to
guage even a gallon of whisky, they flourish out and appear in better
clothes than they ever did before, and blossom out as witnesses in a
court of justice in favor of the government. The surest road to preferment
now seems to be the proclamation of one's own guilt. And the measure
of the preferment is merely the extent of the infamy which the man is
willing to proclaim.' "
The witnesses for the government were attacked with all Mr.
Storrs' tremendous power of invective. The following are some
specimens:
" First. Junker testified that the frauds of which his firm was guilty were
those perpetrated with Pahlman and Rush. There is no doubt but what he
testified to that, is there, gentlemen? And how eloquent Mr. Boutelle became
yesterday in commenting upon that branch of the case ! How vigorous was
he in the denunciation of my clients ; tnese poor men he called them ; he
said Roelle, Junker & Co. were poor. There was nothing in the evidence
upon that subject. They are rich. A man may possibly be excused from
going outside of the record to state the truth ; there is no palliation for his
traveling outside of the record to state an untruth. How eloquent,
again I say, did Mr. Boutelle become in picturing to you this guileless,
innocent, intelligent man, Mr. Junker, walking along in the straight path
of internal revenue rectitude, deflected from that course by the seductive
wiles of Rush and Pahlman, God save the mark ! Junker deceived by any
body ! Junker betrayed by anybody! Junker seduced by anybody! An
unhealthy imagination, the result of a disordered liver — an underdone
steak — must have been the fountain from which such a conception
sprung.
" If, gentlemen of the jury, an instrument partly written and partly
printed is presented to you, and the man whose signature is appended
to it tells you that he did not understand what the instrument was, and
yet all the blanks are regularly and correctly filled in his own hand
writing, what have you got to say to such a witness? When you come
THE CHICAGO WHISKY RING. 465
here into this jury-box you do not leave your every-day judgment out
of doors on the street ; you bring it with you, and you apply it here
precisely as you apply it in your ordinary avocations. There is not a
man now on this jury — there is not a man in the wide circuit of this
State — who would believe a man who told a story of that kind, and yet
Anton Junker has told that story, and you are asked to believe him to
the extent that you will convict good men on his testimony. Gentlemen
of the jury, I say that it is simply shocking — it is atrocious — that men
as decent as my clients shall be put in peril of their personal freedom
upon as infamous and completely riddled testimony as that. But that is
not all. I come now to his general credibility. Who is the man? By
his own testimony, supplemented by that of his employe, he is shown to
have been engaged in a steady, persistent course of fraud ever since
1870. Not a week nor a month has passed during that long interval
of time in which this witness has not been guilty of fraud ; he has com
mitted felony upon the government by robbing the revenue ; he has
committed frauds upon the government by unblushing perjury over and
over again, which he is compelled to admit ; he has committed frauds
upon the revenue by the wilfull and deliberate destruction of his own
books, from which his multifarious frauds would have been discovered.
Yet, gentlemen of the jury, you are asked to believe him !
" Perhaps the course that has been pursued might have been justified
had but one informer been taken ; but what is the spectacle presented
here to-day ? It is not one informer detached from the many and swear
ing against the multitude ; but it is the multitude let loose and swearing
against the individual. I have undertaken to find some precedent for a
case like this. It cannot be found ; history shows no parallel to it.
From twenty to thirty men guilty of felonies against the government
have turned state's evidence against one or two ! That is a violation of
the law, for while the law does give, in extreme cases, to the incon
spicuous conspirator who turns state's evidence a pardon and immunity,
it is just as well settled that the principal offenders shall never be per
mitted to escape. He is not only a defrauder of the revenues, a
perjurer, the suppressor of proof, the destroyer of his books, but bribe-
giving and bribe-taking seem to be a part of his daily avocations. And
added to the crimes already piled up against him, he comes in here as
the contributor to Mr. Jacob Rehm of from £20,000 to $30,000 in money
for the purpose of securing immunity for the frauds he has perpetrated.
The idea of immunity seems to be high and strong in the hearts and
minds of these men. This firm paid Jake Rehm $20,000 for immunity ;
they got his promise for it. He was then their defendant. They are
paying a higher price for the same thing, only they have had to select
a different champion, and that is the officers of trie government.
"The next corroborating witness, DeBos, a poor sniveling employe of
this strong and powerful firm ; illiterate to the last degree ; a participant,
according to his own statement, in all the offenses of which that firm
had been guilty from day to day, and month to month, and year to
.30
466 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
year, comes here, fished up at the last moment, for the purpose of
proclaiming the guilt of his employer and his own guilt as well. He
stated to you upon his direct examination — and it would have been plaus
ible had not this plausibility been dissolved upon his cross-examination —
that the reason that he knew that these spirits had thus been fraudu
lently sold by Rush & Pahlman to Roelle & Junker, was that he read
upon the stamps of these barrels the inscription by which he was enabled
to determine the character of the stamps. I am stating that testimony
with entire and absolute accuracy. His attention having been called in
his cross-examination to the facts, he was unable to satisfactorily describe
why he could distinguish the difference of one from another, and he
was driven to that conclusive corner where, upon the presentation of the
stamp to him, he was compelled to say that he could not read a single
word of it. He swore upon his direct examination that he did read the
stamps. He swore upon his cross-examination that he could not read that
stamp or any other ; and that single significant fact is enough to consign
his testimony to the realms of utter unbelief and disbelief, and denounces
him as a party in the same great crime in which his ' employers are
implicated.
"I have said to you furthermore, that there are exceedingly curious features
about this corroborating testimony. When were these corroborating witnesses
first discovered, and who were they? These defendants had been indicted.
They had — or at least one of themselves declared himself as prepared after
a little time to go to trial. Time passed on, and we came into court
here and asked for a continuance of two days, which the court kindly
granted us. Then, it being absolutely certain the trial must be heard,
the necessity of finding corroborating evidence was very apparent. On
Tuesday, this trial commencing on Wednesday, these corroborating wit
nesses were suddenly fished up by Roelle and Junker going back to
their places of business, talking with their employes — I am justified in
saying instructing them as to the character of corroboration which was
required, and dragging them down here before the officers of the gov
ernment, where they were examined and then put upon the stand.
" Gentlemen of the jury, when you find corroborative evidence of that
character thus incidentally and mysteriously discovered, the conclusion
which you inevitably reach is that there is no corroboration, but that
there is simply another evidence of the long line of guilt in which these
men have been engaged. Am I stretching presumption when I ask you
to believe with me that these so-called corroborating witnesses were the
agents and tools of their employers? Have not Roelle and Junker both
proclaimed to you on the stand here that their subordinates and employes
would make false returns and swear to them whenever their oaths were
required, without the slightest hesitancy, at the demand from their em
ployers — from week to week, and month to month, perjured themselves?
Do you believe that there would be any hesitancy when the great ques
tion of immunity from punishment was before them, that these same men
thus true to perjury would hesitate for a second as witnesses upon the
THE CHICAGO WHISKY RING. 467
stand? Remember, gentlemen of the jury, it is no untrained men that
they have brought here to corroborate them. They are men trained
already in crime. Guilty of numberless felonies, one additional, one more
crime in the long and sickening catalogue is not a matter of the slightest
moment.
" Now talk about the corroborating evidence ! They are corroborated
by witnesses, accomplices — corroborated by their own guilty agents and
instruments — and the fact that they have failed to draw corroboration from
any other quarter demonstrates the extremity to which this case has
been driven — demonstrates that one more crime has already been added
to the others.
"Now, then, gentlemen of the jury, I come to the testimony of Mr.
Ford — Mr. Burton M. Ford. I desire to call your attention to this fact,
that the impeaching testimony of Mr. Ford was not fairly treated yester
day. Counsel suppressed its leading features and characteristics, and un
dertook to wriggle out from the conclusion which the evidence in the
case inevitably fixes upon it, that in denying what occurred before the
Grand Jury, Mr. Ford on this stand was guilty of willful and corrupt
perjury. Praises of Mr. Ford have been very highly sung here : you
have been told how high is his social position. You know nothing of
his social position ; we know nothing of his social position, and the longer
I live in this world and the more I see of it the more unsatisfactory
do 1 regard it when the condition of real and general manhood are to
be employed. This little, wretched, miserable man, is of high social
standing. He may have been to all the glittering receptions in this city,
faultless in his attire and Chesterfieldian in his manners, and a very
admirable character in his accomplishments, but he is a scoundrel to the
government and a perjurer. There has been such a punctilio of crime,
such a refined gentility of scoundrelism, such a course of fraud, such an
elegant propriety in swindling, that in the estimation of the counsel
for the government who are seriously carrying out the great reform, when
these crimes are being committed by men of social prominence, they
turn round and say it is a little indiscretion.
"Gentlemen of the jury, men of integrity existed long before there was
much social distinction; in the earlier and better days of the world
people did not count much on social distinction. Why, the best men
had but little social distinction. Johnson violated all the proprieties of
the parlor, smoked with a cob pipe and sat with his legs crossed. In
company he had no social position, but he was a pretty reputable man,
as all the world knows. Even Abe Lincoln never had social accomplish
ments. Mr. Ford, punctured through and through as he has been with
frauds against his government, was infinitely Mr. Lincoln's superior.
Lincoln was a pretty decent man."
"MR. AVER — 'What frauds do you accuse Mr. Ford of?'
"MR. STORRS — 'I can't stop now to particularize, but I will let you
know before I get through.'
"Anxious to know of what scoundrelism his friend Ford has been
468 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
guilty — this man elevated as an exemplar of social position ! Before I
have finished I will show four or five, which will perhaps be large
enough to satisfy the keen curiosity of Brother Ayer.
"Why is Ford on the stand? The Penitentiary was opening its gates
to receive him. There is freedom and his oath on the one side and
the Penitentiary on the other. No coarse bribe like dollars would reach
Mr. Ford, but for a man in his eminent social position to be sent for
a crime to the Penitentiary was dreadful. And thus, as the evidence in
this case stands, not only have you an informer, but a bad informer,
and, gentlemen of the jury, this is the highest praise that was ever offered
to the man. I hope that no such calamities in the future may ever over
take you. I trust that no such troubles may ever surround you as that you
will be placed before a jury of your countrymen on trial, where your
life or liberty is involved, and your conviction or acquittal rests upon
the testimony of a man who is swearing under such a tremendous pres
sure as that. Here it is as clearly as if it had been written in letters
of living flames against the sky: 'The price that we pay for the testi
mony which you shall deliver in this case is your freedom. Your
testimony must be convicting testimony, or the price will not be paid.
Your freedom for your oath.' Has the government been a party to this?
If not, who has? This arrangement was not made all on one side ; there
were two parties to it, and here stands a witness driven at least to this
confession.'
" Q. 'Have you ever been assured by your counsel, Mr. Smith, that you
are to receive immunity? A. Yes, sir; he gave me to understand I was.'
"Q. 'Did you receive assurances of immunity before you testified? A.
Yes. sir.'
"What does immunity mean? It does not mean a little punishment;
it does not mean a light fine. It means, gentlemen of the jury, abso
lute exemption. It means that this man, because of social position or
for some other reason, guilty of all the crimes which he has himself
detailed, is to be let free on condition that he will swear against his old
friend. Friend! Friend! I know, and you know how to value friends ; but such
a friend as that, who will kiss and betray ! I have already made some
commentaries to you about Beecher. Please stop and think of that. A
government officer for years, by his own statement consistently and. per
sistently a criminal — his whole guilt disclosed last January. Why on earth
was there no indictment? Will you tell me? Are you to sit there and
to be befogged by the averments and noisy dictates of counsel, that there
has been no immunity offered to that man? Offered him! Why, he has
it. It is not a promise ; it is performance. Go back to your homes and
think of it ; think of the scheme in which your government and mine has
been engaged. That government to preserve which you willingly expended
three thousand millions of money, went through the perils of war, and
sacrificed half a million lives; think of it! Men like Beecher, placed
upon the stand here as witnesses, denying that they have immunity, and
holding in their hands their government commission, unindicted, and their
THE CHICAGO WHISKY RING. 469
freedom unchallenged and unquestioned. If this is the kind of govern
ment we have got, gentlemen of the jury, let us take hold of it and
regulate it. I go further. Is there no immunity? Ernst Mattern, Adolph
Mueller — all that savory gang of vagabonds unindicted, unpunished, free
as the wild birds in their roamings. No ; there is no immunity ! No ;
there is no immunity. Becker ; has he got immunity ? What do you
call it, gentlemen of the jury? They say it is a safe conduct. Which
is a safe conduct? Becker left his country for his country's good, as
Beecher had left, and it was fondly hoped that he might remain. But
no, his country called him, and he must obey. Think of Becker, that
pure perjurer and plunderer, come back to his adopted city at the call
of his adopted country ! Is the government engaged in punishing crim
inals? No! What is its chief business? In sheltering and protecting
them. The lightning telegraph carries the message to Becker: Becker
come back! He receives assurance of freedom — the thing he wants; of
immunity, which his heart has so longed for. The operation in that
case was carried on through counsel. You observe how counsel are in
all these cases. There is, so to speak, a "toniness" about these bargains.
There is a professional delicacy required. The counsel managed this
business ; Junker's counsel managed his business : Mattern' s counsel man
aged his business; Becker's counsel managed his business; Ford's assur
ance came from his counsel ; and the time having arrived when there
were two men found against whom there was no documentary evidence,
and nothing but the testimony of perjurers, and determined they would
stand up for trial, counsel went to dispatching telegrams. He received
his dispatch on Tuesday afternoon, and back starts Becker on his patri
otic mission and returns a purified man.
"Who have been the witnesses in this case? How many of them have
been officials? Beecher, Mattern, George H. Miller, Bummer Mueller,
Herman Becker — all these are officials, and some of. them are unindicted ;
unpunished, some of them. Does that, gentlemen of the jury, look like
carrying out their promise?
" But I come back again to the testimony of Mr. Ford, from which I
was diverted by the consideration with reference to immunity. Now, then,
what is his testimony? He was spotless, Mr. Ayer tells you, down to
the time he was seduced by Rush and Pahlman. Was he? Does Ford
tell you so? What kind of spotlessness ? Will it wash? Engaged for years
in buying distilled spirits, for a sum less than the revenue tax on it,
of course he could not suspect that the purchase was perpetrating any
frauds upon the government to which he was a party ? Think of it,
gentlemen, how miserable the pretense! Through 1866, 1867, 1868, by
his own testimony, he was engaged in helping distillers defraud the rev
enue. There can be no surer evidence of fraud than the value of dis
tilled spirits at a price less than the government tax thereon. Mr. Ford
is no chicken. If an unknown man comes to him with a valuable piece
of property which he offers to sell at a price greatly less than its actual
value, and the property turns out to be stolen, in the good old times
4/O LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
when the sun rose in the East, and before we had any revenue cases, that
circumstance was considered as evidence of guilty knowledge. When a
rectifier of such high distinction, of experience of a quarter of a century,
purchases distilled spirits at a price somewhat less than the tax which the
government imposes upon it, he knows as well that there is a fraud in the
transaction, and that he is a party to, and aiding and abetting it, as he
knows that two and two are four; and this is the business in which Mr.
Burton M. Ford, by his own testimony, has been engaged.
"He bought at less, he says, than the tax, and sold for as high a price
as he could get. He relieved his conscience of the inefficiency of the pur
chase money by the exuberance of the price which he received."
"MR. AVER — 'Mr. Storrs, I think Mr. Ford never testified in any such
thing.'
"MR. STORRS — 'Do you? Well you are mistaken.'
"MR. AVER — 'He didn't testify that he bought any spirits of Rush &
Pahlman for less than the government tax.'
"MR. STORRS — 'Oh, yes he did. You do not talk like a man that has
ever been in a court-room.'
"MR. AVER — 'Your declarations to that must be received with some
degree of allowance.'
" MR. STORRS — ' Your contradictions must be taken with a very large
degree of allowance, Mr. Ayer.'
"THE COURT — 'I think Mr. Storrs is correct in that. He stated that he
had bought in times past — in 1866, 1867, and 1868 — below the government
tax. That is my recollection of it.'
"MR. AYER — 'I don't remember it so.'
"MR. STORRS — 'That don't change the fact. If you find it you won't
read it. But that is so conspicuous a fact I did not think it would be
contradicted. I do not know, after all, but that it is better that we should
have these occasional interruptions, because it simply emphasizes the facts.
It underscores them. It italicizes them in your memory and in mine.
You are right, and so am I. We are both right.
"You will inquire, what kind of case is it where the counsel are guilty
of such marvelous obliviousness of all that has been transpiring here.
They have looked with such steady gaze upon the dazzling rays of P^ord's
social position that they have not been able to see another earthly thing. Put
your eyes against the sun sometime and try it.
"Let us go a step further with Mr. Ford. Is he entitled to belief?
Not if the same rule is to be applied to him that the courts have
applied to witnesses for hundreds of years past; not if he has sworn
falsely upon any material point in this case. If he has, gentlemen of the
jury, it is your privilege — not only your privilege, but your duty — to dis
credit him. He comes upon the stand bearing this terrific load of guilt.
He cannot roll it from his shoulders. He comes here bearing an
immunity in one hand and his testimony in the other. Suppose we dis
count that; take him as a spotless man; start with him as such; then
what? Oh, Mr. Ford would not stand the test of truth then! Why?
THE CHICAGO WHISKY RING. 4/1
Because he has proven to have committed one distinct, unmistakable
perjury in this case.
" Burton M. Ford, but a few years since, carrying a pleasant exterior,
walked among his fellows as an honorable man, To-day, that he might
have his freedom, he is morally and absolutely shipwrecked and blasted.
To-day, by his own lips, he stands the perpetrator of, and the partici
pator in, a long line and series of frauds against this government.
" Have I told all this story ? By no means. By no means. It is
considered among men, and has been, as one of the meanest of crimes
— the destruction of one's old books and papers that may possibly lead
to one's own conviction. Conflagrations seemed to be frequent with Bur
ton M. Ford. Time and again and again were his books destroyed.
Why? Destroyed because with all their suppressions, with all the false
hoods they contained — and contained by his direction — still the keen vig
ilance of an honest, shrewd, and faithful officer could detect him in the
crimes of which he had been guilty. And so, covering one crime to
escape detection in another, he calls his man McMahon to his side ; he
waits until this court has delivered a decision, takes his checks and
invoices, all his books and papers, puts them in the flames, and waits
to see that the evidences of his criminality are destroyed. Is that an
indiscretion? Gentlemen of the jury, this is a story which no man has
invented against Burton M. Ford. No witness, influenced by passion or
prejudice or zeal, has testified to it against him. But, great heavens! it
is the man who has told it- against himself! Taken out one by one from
the recesses of his heart, where, in the long years past, they had been
hidden, the crimes of which he has been guilty he has dated out to you,
gentlemen of the jury, and exhibited them in all their hideous deformity,
in order that the greater the crimes of which he had been guilty the
more should he be entitled to your credence and belief.
"Is that all? No. It is enough, is it not? It is not all. I asked
Burton M. Ford if he ever signed any of these returns, which, as a
rectifier, he was obliged to make. He never had ; his book-keeper had
done that. And now let me show you what he says about that poor
book-keeper. Do you remember the commentaries of Mr. Boutelle upon
that branch of the case, yesterday? Were you not appalled at it, when4
unblushingly, Boutelle stood up before you, representing this great gov
ernment, and says: 'Why, he didn't commit any perjuries; he merely got
his book-keeper to do it for him.' I say, again, gentlemen of the jury,
what is there in the air of this business that so utterly demoralized men?
When have your consciences ever been outraged so before, and your
judgments insulted? A witness justified, defended, because the perjuries
from the commission of which he has rolled up his thousands were not
committed by himself, but he got his book-keeper to do it for him.
True, Ford knew they were perjuries. He knew they were necessary.
True, he knew that without them detection of his frauds were sure and
inevitable, and he took this poor book-keeper on the little, miserable
stipend that book-keepers get — Wobecke — he goes up to him month by
4/2 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
month with these fraudulent aud lying returns and says to him: 'Wobecke,
here is a little piece of perjury; please perform it.' [Laughter.] It is
perjury or dismissal. And now, see how callous the man is about it
[reading from the testimony in the case] :
"Q 'Let me show them to you' — that is, these returns. 'Is it possi
ble that you would let your book-keeper go along week after week and
month after month committing perjury in your interest and behalf?1 He
answers : ' It was none of my interest to see what he swore to, but the
man that took the oath.' That is the dirtiest deed of the lot; the dirtiest
deed of the whole sickening line of dirty deeds. Pocketing the proceeds
of this crime, this man of veneered and frescoed social distinction had no
interest in the question as long as his mere subordinate and tool committed
the perjuries for him. I might feel, and you, gentlemen of the jury, if our
hearts were particularly charged with mercy, and in the sunshine of a new
centennial we were beneficent all over, I might feel to say to Ford: 'Poor
Ford; you did commit these perjuries; they were perjuries; you are pun
ished for them; go and sin no more.' But when he sneaks upon the wit
ness' stand and adds to the crime of perjury, the meaner crime of a sneak
and the coward, there is something so deep in the bone that no human
being who speaks English naturally ever in this world excused or forgot it.
And if, after this trial is over, you have any peculiar record at home of
peculiar classes of wickedness, hunt them all up and see if you can find
anything anywhere more utterly heartless, soulless, or bloodless than this.
What is the soul of a poor book-keeper to this decorous gentleman ? What
is his reputation to him? What is the fact? What is that soul that has
been blasted by the crimes it has committed to this man who pockets the
proceeds and reaps the benefits? Nothing.
" The plunder which by this suborned perjury he has reaped enables
him to shine in those social circles of which Mr. Boutelle speaks.- Gen
tlemen, let us resolve to-day that we will have none of this social dis
tinction. We see what it has led us to. Suspected of bribes, frauds of
all kinds, felonies of every description, perjury and subornation of per
jury! These are the instruments by which elevation on that giddy, unsub
stantial platform called social distinction are achieved.
"If Ford's credibility from his own testimony, is not seriously impaired,
will you be good enough to tell me how you are going to impair any
man's testimony? What is it that you will ask a man to do? Murder
may be committed in the heat of passion. Human life may be taken
under tremendous provocation. We may, while we may not forgive it,
still see in the heart of the man guilty of so great a crime some grains
of sanctifying grace. Necessity and want may so overcome the rulings
of one's conscience as that robberies and thefts may be the result; but
yet the robber and the thief may have his good qualities. But, gentle
men, the use of power which the employer has over the employed in
these times to force the latter into the constant commission of perjury is
a sin which in the last great day will, in its fearful enormity, cast its
black and damning shadow all over the crimes which I have named,
THE CHICAGO WHISKY RING. 473
so that it will utterly obscure them. A robber of the revenues through
1866, 1867, 1868, and 1869; a destroyer of his own books; a demonstrated
perjurer upon the stand himself; a suborner of his own employes —
twelve men called here from every portion of Northern Illinois are asked
upon the testimony of such a man, who is swearing for the priceless
boon of freedom, to convict Dr. Rush and Mr. Pahlman, against whose
names up to this time no breath of suspicion had ever been cast.
Should you do it, gentlemen of the jury, your consciences would never
let you sleep.
"It seems to me, gentlemen of the jury, that, right-minded men as
you are, you would see your arms rot and drop from their sockets
before, by a verdict of conviction in this case, you would justify that
kind of scoundrels who have been running riot and rampant in this city
for days and weeks and months. Upon what precipice have we stood and
do we stand to-day ? Can human imagination possibly conceive of dangers
more awful and appalling than those which have surrounded us during all
these dreadful times? Mark you, not an honest pursuit of the truth, not an
earnest effort to discover guilt and punish it, but an utter abandonment of
all designs of that kind, and immunity to the principal actors in this gigan
tic scheme of government plunder which has been carried on here for years'.
The time has come when a halt must be called, and when you shall say
to this rolling tide of wrongs as it sweeps up against your feet, ' Thus far
shalt thou go and no farther; here shall thy proud waves be stayed.'
"So I say, in the presence of those dangers, Rush and Pahlman sink out
of sight utterly. The prosecution of Wilkes in Great Britain years ago almost
brought about a revolution, worthless demagogue as he was; but the princi
ple involved was a great and a sacred one. These men are honest and
upright men, but even if they were ten thousand fold greater men than they
are to-day they would not be of the slightest consequence when compared
with the great, overshadowing question which rests upon your consciences,
which, as jurors and citizens, you must decide. You cannot, if you would,
escape this responsibility. Mueller is put upon the stand. He was tracked
down to a period as far back as 1864, when he was engaged in frauds.
Adolph Mueller, whose characteristics have crystallized into a name so
that the men who know him best and have known him the longest call
him 'Bummer' Mueller, the propriety of which he himself instinctively
recognizes.
"One of their witnesses says to you in the whining manner that he
displayed here — I think it was George A. Mueller — that he held out that
his ccnscience troubled him, but he thought first of the dollar a barrel
and then of his conscience. [Laughter.] And after two weeks of prayerful
meditation, while the dollar was upward first and the conscience next
[laughter], down went the conscience and up went the dollar, and he
came to the front like a man who raised on his bid and says: 'My
conscience troubles me for a dollar, but I can go it for a dollar a half.'
[Laughter.] These are officials.
"Gentlemen of the jury, possibly it is outside of the record, but it is
474 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
a piece of such solid truth I would like to tell it to you. These are
specimens — good specimens — of the Chicago sewer politicians. They are
all little, 'bummer,' city ward-politicians. A dirtier set never lived. The
day before election ring a bell at the mouth of a sewer and see how
they will come forth [laughter] — men just like Bummer Mueller. [Laughter.]
The slums give them up. [Laughter.] They breed with the lizards.
[Laughter.] This is a city politician. These are fitting types and repre
sentatives. I would make no unkind commentaries on a man's face.
The Lord is in a measure responsible for that [laughter] except the tone
and color which whisky, straight or crooked, vigorously applied, has
given to the countenances of some of these men; but our Great Father
is kind to us here — very kind — and when He makes a bummer if He
don't write it upon the face of a man like Adolph Mueller in such
legible characters that no man who can see could be mistaken, I am
mistaken. Put those countenances altogether — read them. Look at them.
Gentlemen of the jury, would you go to that kind of faces for truth ?
Would you search the records of such lives as those, low down and
depraved as they have been for years, for any satisfactory evidence in
so sacred a business as the administration of justice? Better go to pois
oned springs for the water you drink than to go to such sources as these
for truth, from which truth fled disgusted long years since.
"One happy result we have reached is this: They have been trained
on this stand one after another, and the tax-ridden and oppressed peo
ple have read the record which these scoundrels have made for them
selves, and they finally have got to see by whom in the years past
they have been ruled and governed. Roelle has been a County Com
missioner, Becker active in politics ; Bummer Mueller tells you he was
elected by the people as 'assassor.' Little low-down politicians all of
them ; utterly characterless — completely and utterly so — with souls - so
small that even with the largest measure of redemption and salvation
the great danger is that in the final day, with the most microscopic
vision, they will be overlooked. [Laughter.] They have been contra
dicted, gentlemen; they contradict themselves and each other."
He then turned to the consideration of the documentary and
other evidence introduced for the defence:
" I desire rtow to call your attention to one tremendous bit of evidence
in this case. It is the fact that while these other confessed plunderers of the
revenue destroyed their books, because, as they have proclaimed to you, the
emergency of the case demanded it, Rush and Pahlman have seduously
preserved and cared for theirs. These witnesses, one after another, have
demonstrated to you that it is utterly impossible that the books — taking the
whole series of them — should not betray these frauds. Start with a false
entry anywhere, your falsehood, must be carried consistently, persistently
through from the beginning to the end. It must not only be a falsehood;
not only a fraud, but the same fraud ; else you slip and detection is sure.
A lie, a suppression, once finding a record on the books must, if it succeed,
THE CHICAGO WHISKY RING. 4/5
know 'neither variableness nor shadow of turning;' and yet this govern
ment, engaged as it has been in the prosecution of these investigations for
months and months, having in its custody the books of these defendants
ever since last January, subjecting them during all those months to the most
rigid scrutiny and the keenest examination, to all the tests which human
ingenuity could apply or devise, have utterly, miserably failed in producing
from all that vast multitude of records one single trace or line that is crim
inatory to these defendants. I do not know how it strikes your mind, gen
tlemen of the jury, but it seems to me to be a tremendously telling cir
cumstance here. There are cases where the most tremendously telling
evidence which possibly can be commanded is the evidence of silence.
When one is charged of wrong, and remains silent in the presence of
the wrong, how telling and significant is the silence. If there were frauds,
these books, examined as they might be, would speak the fact so elo
quently, so clearly that they could by no earthly possibility be the shadow
of a mistake about it. What have the books done? We have produced
them as far as we could. We would be glad that they should all go
before you. And yet Mr. Boutelle, representing the government, yester
day had the hardihood to ask us why we have not produced all this
great volume of record which has been in the custody of the govern
ment ever since last January. And, gentlemen, was that a fair point to
make? Was that an honest point to make? Was there anything in the
situation of the counsel that justified the making of such a point as
that ? Was there anything in the emergency of the case which possibly
could have excused it? There those books have lain, and every one of
them that has been introduced in evidence we have introduced ourselves.
We would be glad, if time permitted, that you would go through every
one of them. They have not suffered them to be removed from the
custody where they have been since January, and subjected to the keen
est scrutiny and the most rigid investigation. Those voiceless, tongueless
books yet speak, and speak more eloquently than I can, from their
very silence, as to fraud and the absolute guiltlessness and innocence of
these defendants. In the presence of the tremendous evidence of that
silence, hordes and hordes of self-proclaimed plunderers and self-convicted per
jurers might come upon the stand here until the weary soul sickened at the
spectacle, and yet the silent testimony of the books would prevail.
" I superadd to all that the high and flattering testimonials which have
been borne here to their reputation. You observed, gentlemen of the
jury, that we stopped calling witnesses as tp character because the court
required us so to do. Scores of witnesses had been summoned upon tnat
point,, and would have been placed upon the stand here, but the court,
in the exercise of its rightful discretion — judicial discretion — declared that
we had gone far enough on that point. You would be satisfied, gentle
men, if the old friends that had known you in the long years that have
passed, men who had themselves borne honorable lives, and in some instances
those lives have ripened into large measures of fame and renown: would
it not be a source of solid satisfacticn to you, standing, as the most of you
476 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
do, upon the down-hill side of your lives, that the old friends whom you
had known in the years that are passed could speak nothing but bene
dictions in your praise? That is the splendor of character. That is the
beauty of a good name ; that when it is assailed by informers and by sneaks
and cowards the good deeds of the long years that are passed seem to take
root and ripen, and ripen, and ripen, and they blossom into the final fruit
of complete and perfect vindication. All this results from a good name,
which is not the birth merely of a day, but is the steady outgrowth of the
steady working of the long years of the past. Such a result it is that
sweetens all the troubles and disasters of life to us. And in the presence
of such a character thus vindicated and thus sustained, the outraged citizen
thus assailed may clothe himself safely about with the good name that his
friends give him. It is a potent armor that will protect him against the
poisoned darts of malice and perjury. It is a sure shelter and refuge
in the time of trouble. If you have sons, I know, gentlemen of the jury,
that you can ask nothing better for them than that, in the long road of .
time which it is to be hoped they may have before them, when they
reach the years that these defendants have attained, they can call about
them such hosts of friends who will stand up with the enthusiasm which
has been indicated upon this witness stand and vindicate them.
"Gentlemen of the jury, I am loath to leave this case. I am loath to leave
you. I am impressed with the greatness, with the solemnities of the issues
which it involves.
"We are standing to-day, gentlemen of the jury, just upon the thresh
old of our second centennial. The one hundred years that are before
us hold out to us, as I sincerely believe, great achievements and noble
deeds, and that in those years that are before us the Almighty is, slowly
it may be, but surely nevertheless, hewing out for this land that we love
the most colossal and splendid results of history. Standing upon the
threshold of that coming time, remembering the perils through which we
have passed, and the perils through which our fathers before us have
passed, let us signify our devotion to the great cause of good govern
ment and undivided liberty by saying to these defendants that they stand
vindicated, and that the tongue of the slanderous and perjured informer
can work no harm. Their interests are intrusted to your hands ; we feel
that they are safe there. I need not impress upon you further the import
ance of these great questions which you are called upon to decide.
You know them as well as I know them, and when the final decision
comes, gentlemen, gladden your own hearts, justify your own judgments,
make all these people rejoice that the great danger which has threat
ened them is averted, and pronounce, as I believe it will be your pleas
ure to pronounce, the verdict which shall meet the approval of the best
judgment of the best men of the country — 'We find the defendants, Not
Guilty.1 "
This strong appeal was unsuccessful, and the defendants were
convicted. The jury were out nearly twenty-four hours before
THE CHICAGO WHISKY RING. 477
they reached a verdict. That trial had the effect of breaking down
the informer system; and so great was the public indignation at
the result, that, as stated by the District Attorney, any success
with evidence of such a character thereafter became impossible.
The trial of Supervisor Munn was, however, proceeded with on
evidence of the same character. The leading witness against Mr.
Munn was Jacob Rehm.
"His testimony," said Mr. Storrs in his letter to the President, "and
that of the other witnesses in the case, demonstrated the fact that Rehm was
the fountain-head of these frauds, that he absolutely dominated and control
led the appointment of all the subordinate officers here, that they held their
positions subject to his will, and that it has been utterly impossible, since
the spring of 1872, for any one engaged in the business of distilling to pro
secute it without paying contributions to Mr. Jacob Rehm. The fact is
that he has received by this course of plunder from the distilling inter
ests in this city, since the spring of 1872, it is safe to say, at least four hun
dred thousand dollars. The shallow pretence he made, that he was se
duced by Mr. Hesing into this business, and that he had himself
retained none of the money which he had thus extorted from the dis
tillers, met, when the pretence was first made, with universal derision
and contempt, and was totally overthrown during the progress of the
trial. The entire community felt that the conviction of any man upon
the testimony of Mr. Rehm would be such an outrage upon the rights
of the citizen, that it could not for an instant be tolerated ; and
although the government officials put forward the case of Mr. Munn first
as being doubtless the strongest one, yet his acquittal meets with univer
sal approval, and the course which Mr. Rehm has pursued, and the
protection which he seems to be receiving from the government, meet
with as universal condemnation. The present District Attorney, Judge
Bangs, is a most faithful, efficient, and without doubt, honest 'officer. He
apprehends, as clearly as I do, the unfortunate position in which the
government is placed whenever it seeks the conviction of any man upon
the testimony of such a witness. He understands, as clearly as I under
stand, that every effort now made in that direction is a discredit to any
administration which makes it. From the prosecution of any officials
based upon the testimony of Mr. Rehm, is withdrawn every element of
moral support in this community. I venture to say that in this entire
State, not one intelligent, honest-minded citizen can be found who would
not deplore any further efforts in that direction, believing that a contin
uance of these prosecutions would result in most serious discredit to the
government itself, and believing also, so thoroughly aroused is the public
feeling against this man that a conviction is an utter impossibility."
The trial of Mr. Munn resulted in an honorable acquittal ; and
Judge Bangs thereupon dismissed the indictments against Ward
and Wadsworth, notwithstanding that he had been directed by
4/8 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
the Solicitor of the Treasury, Mr. Bluford Wilson, to go on with
them.
"There still remain upon the docket undisposed of, two cases, — one
against the former Collector, Mr. Wadsworth, and the other against the
former District Attorney, Mr. Ward. I think it is safe to say that in
this community, where Mr. Wadsworth is known, not one man in a thous
and to-day believes he is guilty ; not one in a thousand ever believed it.
" The case against him is weaker than the case against Munn, and it
practically rests upon the unsupported testimony of Jacob Rehm. There is
practically no case against Mr. Ward, except such as Mr. Rehm may
see fit to swear to. But the difficulty has been that up to the present
time, at least, Rehm has held the distillers in such complete subjection
as, by threats and otherwise, to lead them to believe that if they told
the truth against him severer punishment would be inflicted upon them
for it ; so that it has been impossible to expose the full extent and meas
ure of his iniquities. I have represented to Judge Bangs this condition
of affairs, and the terrorism under which the distillers have rested, and
he assured me that he was not aware of it, and I do not believe that
he -was. I think, however, that he now credits my statement; and I do
not believe that, if left to his own judgment, he would deem it wise, or
just, or decent to go one step further in the prosecution of the cases
against either Wadsworth or Ward. I have nothing to say now as to
this business of immunity, although it is a matter upon which I have
very positive opinions. That will probably be a subject for future inves
tigation ; but I desire to state to you that my profound conviction is that
the league which, unwittingly or otherwise, the government, through its
representative in this city, has made with the worst men engaged in the
whisky business does more damage, and inflicts an infinitely greater
injury upon public morals and the substantial public interests, than all
the robbing of the revenues since we had a national existence. The gov
ernment has demonstrated that it is sufficiently powerful to protect itself
against frauds upon its revenue. The whisky ring in this city, of which
Jacob Rehm was the author, is crushed out of existence. The members
of that ring are to-day bankrupt, without a single exception, and it is
not only my opinion, but the opinion, I believe, of every fair-minded man
in this community, that the time has now come when the government
should stay its hand, and declare that through no self-proclaimed thieves
and perjurers will it seek the conviction of any one. Regarded merely
from the low stand-point of political expediency, it is perfectly clear that
a continuance of the methods which have been employed -in these pros
ecutions would be most unwise. The fact is that in the prosecutions in
this city the government itself has been in league with the whisky ring,
and Rush and Pahlman in their case, and Munn in his, have been, and
Wadsworth in his case will be, compelled to attack that ring and the
members of it. The earliest sinners and the worst have stood the high
est in the favor of the government. Such men as Goleson, Parker R.
Mason, and Jacob Rehm, who have always been utterly disreputable and
THE CHICAGO WHISKY RING. 4/9
characterless, seem at least to have had control of the prosecutions, and
to have dictated the methods in which the prosecutions shall be carried
on. They have had the confidence and the ear of the government. This
condition of affairs Judge Bangs is beginning to understand. I do not
believe that he relishes the position in which he finds himself placed.
"He has, I understand, written to the Attorney-General with reference
to the cases of Wadsworth and Ward ; and he declares to me that, left
to himself, he should have no hesitancy in directing the dismissal of those
cases. I have troubled you upon this subject for the reason that I felt desir
ous you should understand what the general feeling of the public is, and
I assure you nothing could be done which would meet with more unan-
mous and cordial approval of our entire community, and the more thor
ough endorsement of our best public sentiment, than the discountenan
cing of the employment of such men as Jacob Rehm, by the dismissal
of the cases in which he figures as the principal witness. I am anxious
that you shall understand what this feeling is, and that the Attorney-Gen
eral should understand it; and, were he inquired of, I have not the
slightest doubt that Judge Drummond and every friend that you have in
this city would thoroughly endorse what I have said. Among the distillers
who have been indicted and pleaded guilty, there are a few who have
always stood well. H. B. Miller, Mr. Powell, Dickinson, Leach & Co.,
and Rush & Pahlman are men who went into the distillation^ of illicit spir
its when it became evident that the government would not assist them in
the prevention of frauds in other cities, and that they must either them
selves engage in the manufacture of illicit spirits or quit the business. These
men have already been most severely punished ; they are all bankrupt; they are
useful men, and, in the main, good citizens. They are entitled to belief;
they have not sought their own escape by the ruin of their associates and
competitors in business. Their course has been manly and straightforward;
and yet, the curious result seems to be reached that they are specially to
be made to suffer, while the infinitely guiltier ones are to escape. It is
through them, and through the exposure which Mr. Hesing has made, that the
full extent and measure of Mr. Jacob Rehm's long continued frauds upon
the revenue have been discovered. Upon Mr. Hesing, Mr. Rehm, taking
advantage of his position as a government witness, attempted to unload.
"Of course such an effort was ridiculous upon the face of it, and encoun
tered utter and shameful failure. Whatever Mr. Hesing' s political errors
may have been, he is a truthful man, and, at the risk of added years of
imprisonment with which he was threatened, he took the stand, and, as far
as he was permitted to do so, told the truth of Mr. Jacob Rehm. These,
however, are matters to be considered in the future. It will be well and
wise, I think, at some future period for the administration to understand
precisely the facts,— the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
"I am as certain as I am of anything in this world, that if you ever come
to know the truth, justice will be done ; not such justice as seems to have
been arranged for in these prosecutions, but such as an intelligent, honest
public sentiment will approve."
480 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
The local press, with singular unanimity, adopted Mr. Storrs'
view of these cases. They commended the action of the District
Attorney in dismissing the indictments against Wadsworth and
Ward. Mr. Bluford Wilson, the Solicitor of the Treasury, had
ordered the trials to proceed, but Judge Bangs decided to dismiss
them upon deliberate conviction that the government could expect
only a verdict of acquittal. One Chicago paper said: — "It was
known at the time of the Munn trial that the government had
made as strong a case as lay within its power. The result in
that case demonstrated that juries would not convict on such
testimony as the government had to offer. This was the situa
tion, as we understand it, when Mr. Solicitor Wilson arrived in
Chicago and ordered that the trials should be proceeded with,
against the better judgment of the distinguished counsel in charge.
It is for this reason that we say Judge Bangs and his associates
are to be especially commended. They are to be commended
because in the course of the administration of justice they have
seen fit to. disregard altogether the unwarranted interference of
a subordinate of the Treasury Department by declining to prose
cute within reasonable expectation of conviction. Messrs. Wads-
worth and Ward have been long and favorably known in this
community, and public sentiment had long since acquitted them."
Another journal said, — " The Munn trial was, in effect, the trial
of their cases. Jake Rehm was relied upon as the main witness
against the three. To have put him on the stand again would
have 'been a species of subornation of perjury. Judge Bangs was
true to his duty as a prosecutor for the Government when he
moved for a nolle proscqui in the two remaining cases, and
Judge Blodgett could hardly have done otherwise than order the
motion entered. If any remaining case really turns on the testi
mony of Jake Rehm, it should be dismissed. A perfectly innocent
man might have fled in terror from Rehm's tongue. It required
remarkable courage on Colonel Munn's part to stand trial." Still
another paper said, — "This action of the government counsel in
dismissing the indictments against Ward and Wadsworth will meet
with universal approval under the circumstances. They had no
evidence against eithe: of these gentlemen except that of Jake
Rehm, and the Munn trial abundantly demonstrated that neither
the public nor a jury would accept his story as true. It would
THE CHICAGO WHISKY RING. 481
therefore have been a useless task to have gone on with the
other trials depending upon the same evidence, and the result
would merely have served to demoralize the administration of
justice in the Federal Courts so that, as one of the counsel was
heard to say, 'it would be eventually impossible to convict a
counterfeiter with the tools in his pockets.' If the government
counsel are open to criticism, it is from lack of sagacity in going
to trial in any case on Jake Rehm's story, which was repug
nant to the common judgment of those who have known him."
It was a noticeable fact very early in the history of these
prosecutions that there did not seem to be so great an anxiety
to punish really guilty men, against whom the evidence was
overwhelming, as to implicate by the testimony of these guilty
parties men of official and political prominence. This was
observed by Mr.*Tutton while in Chicago. He stated before an
investigating committee at Washington that at an interview
between himself, Treasury Solicitor Wilson, the District Attorney,
and the special government counsel, Messrs. Dexter and Ayer,
he was instructed to procure evidence against Ward and Wads-
worth, the Solicitor saying, "After they are indicted there will
be plenty of people to give you evidence against them. The
main thing is to get them indicted." It was even suggested
that, as Rehm and Hesing were political men, and backers of
Congressman Farwell and Senator Logan, an effort should be
made to hunt up evidence against these two latter gentlemen.
Mr. Tutton declined to act in the matter from a political point
of view, believing that the sole purpose of the government should
be to establish the guilt of the actual offenders, and punish
them. The eagerness to indict Senator Logan and other promi
nent officials was clearly demonstrated by the evidence taken
before the Congressional investigating committee, and it was also
conclusively shown that the guilty distillers, gaugers, and store
keepers were to be used as witnesses for that purpose. Mr.
Ward stated that the question of immunity was raised before he
went out of office, and that Mr. Bluford Wilson, in talking about
it, said there were several men to implicate whom he would be
willing to grant these men immunity. He referred to General
Logan, Mr. Farwell, and Mr. Frank Palmer. "He said that he
believed Logan was the mover and backer of this ring? and that
31
482 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
he and his agents and appliances were the life of it." The ques
tion was put to Mr. Ward, " Did Wilson say in your presence,
•Damn the evidence?' Mr. Ward replied, "He said, 'Damn the
men;' that the people were afraid of them now; indict them,
and there would be lots of people ready to come and peach on
them — to blow upon them. I said to him I did not believe
that was good practice. He confined his denunciation chiefly to
Logan and his friends. Harwell's name was not often used in
my presence, for the reason that I had some words with Mr.
Wilson on the subject. I told him that Mr. Farwell was a friend
of mine of many years standing, and that I did not believe any
thing of the kind against him." A newspaper correspondent at
Washington also testified to a conversation he had had with Mr.
Bluford Wilson, in which the Solicitor expressed his confidence
that he would succeed in indicting Senator Logan.
Mr. Tutton subsequently laid the whole matter before the
President, and gives the following narrative of what occurred: —
"I said to the President that it might be good policy, though I
doubted it very much, and at any rate if that policy was to be
carried out, of letting thieves who had stolen hundreds of thous
ands of dollars, which we could prove against them, -go free and
be relieved from punishment, no man in the revenue service was
safe; that these men who had been committing perjury right
along, both distillers and gaugers, month after month, would
swear anybody into the penitentiary in order to escape it them
selves. I did not want to have anything to do with matters of
that kind. The President said he thought that something ought
to be done to stop that wholesale bargain and sale business."
It was at this time, while the air was filled with rumors of
bargains being made by the wholesale with the guiltiest members
of the whisky ring in Chicago, St. Louis, and Milwaukee, that
Attorney-General Pierrepont wrote a circular letter on the sub
ject to the District Attorneys in those cities. A tremendous
outcry was raised because of that letter. The most vehement
denials were made that any such bargains existed. The President
and the Attorney-General were both denounced as being in the
interest of the whisky ring. The parties with whom these alleged
bargains were made zealously denied them under oath. The
government counsel denied them. Mr. Tutton was charged with
THE CHICAGO WHISKY RING. ^ 483
interfering with the officers of the law in their righteous efforts
to put down the whisky ring, and his removal was threatened.
A telegram from Secretary Bristow to Mr. Tutton was published,
denying that there was any truth in the statement. Mr. Storrs,
who attempted in court to urge that such bargains had been
made, was summarily stopped by the presiding judge; and yet,
until he received his commission as special District Attorney for
the disposal of the Chicago cases, not one of these guilty parties
was ever called up for sentence, and they then claimed that it
was because of an agreement that they should not be.
In the summer of 1876 Mr. Storrs was appointed special Dis
trict Attorney for the purpose of closing up the cases against the
Chicago whisky ring operators still remaining on the docket.
Believing that his clients, Rush and Pahlman, had been wrong
fully convicted on the testimony of perjured informers, he had
naturally a strong feeling and desire to see that if the other
parties against whom suits for civil penalties had been instituted
were made to refund to the Government their ill-gotten gains,
the worst offender of all, as he judged Mr. Rehm to be, should
in particular be compelled to disgorge. But the special purpose
of his appointment, and the end which he was most anxious to
accomplish, was to fix the responsibility for the extraordinary
bargain entered into between the government counsel and the
culprits under indictment where it properly belonged, and to
relieve the President from the odium which had been attempted
to be cast upon him in connection with this discreditable trans
action. With this end in view he endeavored to perfect record
evidence as to the actual terms of the bargain and the authority
on which such bargain was made, and to have this evidence
spread upon the records of the United States Circuit Court. In
a letter to Attorney General Taft, dated August 29, 1876, he
reports the result of an interview with District Attorney Bangs
as to the course to be pursued in regard to the disposition of
the whisky cases still remaining on the docket. . In that letter
he said:
"The Judge at first seemed to think that the facts with reference to
the promised immunity were already sufficiently well known ; but after
calling his attention to the consideration that there was no recorded evidence,
and that the testimony before the Whisky investigating committee at Wash
ington was exceedingly conflicting upon that point, he agreed with me
484 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
that it was desirable that, upon the disposition of the cases, evidence
either by way of affidavits regularly filed in Court or by the examination of
the parties under oath was important, in order to ascertain just what the
immunity was, and to what extent it was to be carried, and with whom
the agreements were made, so that the Court might be enabled to act
intelligently and justly in the final disposition of the cases. He agreed
with me that if the facts showed an agreement for absolute immunity
from punishment, the indictments should be dismissed, and he also agreed
with me that the entry dismissing the indictments should recite the
grounds upon which the entry itself was made. I urged upon Judge
Bangs the importance of an immediate disposition of these cases, and he
agreed with me that they might as well be dismissed under proper
showings at Chambers as elsewhere."
Mr. Storrs accordingly had the affidavits of the representatives
of the " first batch" taken and filed in the United States Court,
setting forth the terms on which they were granted immunity ;
and it appeared from these that a very liberal discretion had been
allowed by the Department to the District Attorney and his
special assistants in dealing with these informers. Upon reading
and filing those papers, an order was entered in each of the cases,
in which the facts were recited as Mr. Storrs had suggested; and thus
that list of cases was disposed of, very little to the satisfaction of
the general public or to the credit of the government, but to the
complete refutation of all pretences that the President was in
any way responsible for the extraordinarily lenient way these cul
prits were treated. The order dismissing the indictments sets
forth that " it was agreed between the counsel for the above-named
defendants on the one part, and Hon. Mark Bangs, the U.- S.
District Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, and Hon.
Wirt Dexter, Benjamin F. Ayer, and L. H. Boutelle, special
assistant District Attorneys, on the other part, that in case
the said defendants should divulge the facts within their know
ledge as to the alleged whisky frauds fully and fairly, and turn
State's evidence, they should have among other things complete
immunity from punishment by fine or imprisonment, and from,
any criminal liability on account of any matters set forth in said
indictment, or which might appear against them by reason of any
disclosures which they might make." The entire responsi
bility, therefore, rested in the first place with Secretary Bristow and
the solicitor to the Treasury, Mr. Bluford Wilson, who authorized,
and next with the District Attorney and his assistants, who made
THE CHICAGO WHISKY RING. 485
the bargain. In a letter to the President just after the dismissal
of these cases, Mr. Storrs said :
"Yesterday morning the parties appeared before Judge Blodgett in
chambers. Messrs. Swett and Smith filed their affidavit, which was endorsed as
true by Judge Bangs, and an order, which I had prepared, was
entered, dismissing the indictments. I send you herewith copies of the
statement and the order. Thus we have finally reached bottom, and the
truth has at last come to light and is of record. We have not yet the
whole truth. I have insisted that upon the claim for immunity from
civil liability, I must have the facts at first hand. The agreement was
originally made between Gholson G. Russell, the leader of the 'squealers,'
and Bristow, Wilson, and Matthews. Russell is now in Colorado. He
has been telegraphed for, and his affidavit showing up this whole busi
ness will go upon the files. This will, of course, make most interesting
reading. Mr. Swett made an elaborate statement justifying the course
which he had pursued, and also justifying the action of the government
counsel. It is enough to say as to that, that Tutton clearly shows that
the proof was conclusive against all these men. However, it does appear
from Swett's speech that the trade was- opened and practically concluded
at Washington."
In this same letter, Mr. Storrs urged the pardon of the " sec
ond batch," who he thought had been harshly treated.
"I have been beset," he said, "by many Republicans who were at first
disinclined to take any steps towards securing pardons, for immediate
action in those cases. As matters now stand we must expect to lose
the German vote. They say the government has carried out its agree
ment with the great thieves ; why should it not at once carry out its
agreement with the comparatively innocent men now in jail? There is
no answer to this. There can be no answer to it. The agreement was
clear and unmistakable that they should all be treated alike, and the
mere announcement, so that it can be authoritatively used, that the
pardons had been granted for all, which is the clear line of justice,
would do us incalculable service. Of course, I am not to be understood
as arguing immediate action on political grounds; but — there stands the
agreement with these men on the one hand violated, and the agreement
with the 'first batch' carried out in all its details. Hesing's pardon
should be simultaneous with the others, because then all chance of say
ing that it was the price paid for political advantages would be removed.
If he is pardoned when the rest are, and on the same conditions and
for the same reasons, to wit, that the agreement under which he pleaded
guilty was the same as that made with the other parties, all cavils of
this kind are put out of the way, and it stands on the strong and solid
foundations of absolute truth. These men are all hopelessly ruined, and
now feeling begins to run so strongly in their favor that the danger is
that they may come to be regarded as martyrs."
486 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
This letter had its due weight, and the pardons were shortly
afterwards granted. Mr. Storrs next turned his attention to the
prosecution of a civil suit against Jacob Rehm, for a penalty
amounting to one million dollars, or double the amount of which
he was claimed to have defrauded the revenue. Rehm's counsel
claimed that his exemption from civil liability, while not included
specifically in the agreement made with him, was a fair inference
from the fact that he was used as a government witness. Judge
Bangs was not a party to the agreement with Rehm, and at
first was inclined to agree with Mr. Storrs that the immunity
extended to him from criminal punishment did not relieve him
of his civil liability. Mr. Storrs held that Rehm's testimony had
not been of the slightest service to the government; that in any
event, the immunity granted to him was on condition that he
should testify " truthfully, fully, and fairly," and that Rehm had
not done this ; and that therefore the government was not bound
by the agreement as to immunity, even if it specifically covered
Rehm's civil liability. He prepared an elaborate argument review
ing the whole question, which was submitted to Attorney Gen
eral Taft, eliciting the following reply:
"I have received your letter of the 3d inst., covering your opinion in
the Rehm case. I have carefully read the opinion, and am pleased
with the argument you make upon the points in the case, and concur
in your conclusion. "Very respectfully,
" ALPHONSO TAFT, Attorney-General."
While the civil suit was pending, Rehm was called up for sen
tence in the District Court, and the light penalty of six months'
imprisonment and $10,000 fine imposed upon him by Judge
Blodgett. A pardon was speedily obtained for him on the
recommendation of Judge Blodgett and the District Attorney.
His counsel then filed a motion to dismiss the suit against
him for the civil penalty, basing it upon the alleged immunity
and the pardon. While this motion was pending, they made a
strenuous effort to secure a dismissal of the suit through the
Department of Justice. Against this course Mr. Starrs protested,
and in a letter to Attorney-General Devens stated his views fully,
concluding as follows: — "I have seen no reason to change the
opinion expressed by me in the document submitted to Judge
Taft, and notwithstanding all that has been or may be said to
the contrary, do not believe that the prosecution of this suit
THE CHICAGO WHISKY RING. 487
against him involves any breach of faith with him. Success in
this case, — so conspicuous is the case, and so prominent has
Rehm been among the large brood of local and machine politi
cians — would in my judgment be productive of the most health
ful and salutary results."
Attorney-General Devens wrote to Judge Bangs instructing
him, in connection with Mr. Storrs, to submit to the Court the
question whether the arrangement between the counsel for the
Government and Rehm's counsel was such as to impose upon the
Government the duty, as a matter of honor and good faith, of
dismissing the suit. "If the court," he said, "shall find this
question affirmatively, or shall upon the hearing of the evidence
so advise, you will dismiss the suit. I write this with the approval
of the Secretary of the Treasury."
Mr. Storrs had previously recommended that this question be
submitted to Judge Drummond, in a letter to Attorney-General
Devens in which he said:
"There is not in the Northwest a judicial officer who commands such
universal respect, confidence, and esteem as Judge Drummond. In no
hands will the interests of the government be more secure, or the rights of
the accused more conscientiously guarded and respected than in his. The
trouble is, as I think, that the counsel for Mr. Rehm are very certain that
before Judge Drummond .this motion will be denied. I have every confidence
that it will be denied, and that too not merely upon technical grounds, but
upon the justice and fairness of the whole case. The extreme reluctance of
Rehm and his counsel to confront Judge Drummond does not grow out of
any doubt of the ability and integrity of the man, but from an entire lack
of confidence in the case which they will present to him. I am justified by
the opinion of ninety-nine out of a hundred of our citizens in stating that
Rehm's testimony was in many material particulars grossly and absurdly
false. The pretence that he is entitled to civil immunity was never thought
of until after this suit was brought. The fact is, neither his counsel nor the
then representatives of the government had thought of his liability under
section 3296, and their attention had never been called to it; and I under
take to say that, placed upon the stand and subjected to a cross-examination,
not one of the counsel for the government will testify that they supposed
when they were trading with Rehm that they were relieving him from a
pecuniary liability to the government of over one million dollars. I think
we have a right to a fair trial of that question, together with the other
question as to whether he testified truthfully, fully, and fairly, not by ex
parte affidavits, but by an examination of the witnesses in open court. If
upon such a test, Rehm should make a case, I certainly would make no
protest against any result which might legitimately follow from it."
488 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORRS.
The former government counsel, nevertheless, did go upon the
stand before Judge Drummond, and were closely cross-examined
by Mr. Storrs; and, contrary to his expectation, they did testify
as to the bargain made with Rehm in such a manner as to leave
Judge Drummond only one duty to perform. He reported his
conclusion to District Attorney Bangs as follows:
"I have considered the case of Jacob Rehm, now under prosecution by
the United States for a money penalty for violation of the Internal Revenue
law, in view of the testimony heard before us to-day. An indictment
under the Internal Revenue law was found against him at the Decem
ber term A. D. 1875 ; and while it was pending, a proposition was made
by his counsel to the counsel of the government, that he would fairly
and truly communicate all he knew as to offences against the Internal
Revenue law, and would in the same spirit testify as a witness for the
government in any prosecutions for its violation. An interview accordingly
took place between Messrs. Lawrence and Campbell, representing the
defendant, and yourself and Messrs. Ayer, Dexter, and Boutelle, repre
senting the government. The result was an agreement that Rehm should
plead guilty to all the counts of the pending indictment, and carry out in good
faith the proposition made through his counsel, and that the government
should not insist upon a certain punishment. All of the terms agreed on
by the counsel of the respective parties touching the indictment and its
contingent penalties need not be mentioned, as that proceeding is ter
minated, and no question arises on the subject. The only controversy
is whether it was a condition made by the defendant and accepted by
the government that he should receive immunity as to all penalties other
than what might be considered strictly criminal, for offences committed
by him against the Internal Revenue law, and for which he would be
liable to a money penalty merely. It does not appear that such immu
nity was expressly mentioned, or promised by the counsel of the govern
ment, at the interview named ; but it is clear from their statements that
the counsel of the defendant understood it to reach that extent, and to
constitute a part of the contract made between the parties. Had they
the right to assume that this was necessarily implied from all the cir
cumstances of the case ? I think they had. This is admitted by three
of the counsel representing the government. It is of more importance to
the public interests that all agreements of this kind should be carried out
in good faith by the government, than the possible success of a prose
cution for a money penalty against the defendant. That the defendant
fulfilled his part of the agreement is not questioned by the counsel. I
think, therefore, that the government ought not to continue the prosecu
tion now pending against the defendant for a money penalty for a viola
tion of the Internal Revenue law."
Upon this finding, the District Attorney, in accordance with
his instructions, dismissed the suit.
CHAPTER XXIV,
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1876.
RATIFICATION MEETING IN CHICAGO— COLORLESS CANDIDATES— SPEECH AT
AURORA, ILLINOIS — THE RECORDS OF THE REPUBLICAN AND DEMOCRATIC
PARTIES COMPARED — THE ST. LOUIS PLATFORM, WITH ITS SOPHISTRIES
ABOUT REFORM, CENTRALISM, AND DEFALCATIONS — THE FINANCIAL ADMIN
ISTRATION OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY — REDUCTION OF TAXATION AND
EXPENSES — TILDEN THE FRIEND OF TWEED — SPEECH AT DETROIT — REVIEW
OF THE DEMOCRATIC PLATFORM AND TILDEN*S RECORD — SPEECH AT
FREEPORT, ILLINOIS — RECORD OF THE DEMOCRACY — ENFORCING THE CON
STITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS — A NEW APPLICATION OF THE PARABLE OF
THE PRODIGAL SON — WHERE TILDEN WAS DURING THE WAR.
THE result of the Republican National Convention, which met
at Cincinnati in May, 1876, and nominated Hayes and
Wheeler, was as much of a disappointment to Mr. Storrs as it
was to the majority of the party throughout the United States.
In common with them, he would have preferred a known leader
at the head of the ticket; a man who was stalwart in his convic
tions, and who could give effect to the demand of the party as
expressed in the platform of 1876, for the vigorous and continu
ous exercise of the powers of the Federal Government until all
classes were secure in their civil and political rights. How Mr.
Hayes would carry out this programme was entirely a matter of
conjecture, as he was almost without a record when he unexpec
tedly rose into the most prominent place before the nation.
Ahvays ready to subordinate his personal preferences to the inter
ests of the party, howrever, Mr. Storrs took a vigorous part in the
campaign, and stumped Mr. Hayes' own State in his behalf.
A ratification meeting was held in Chicago shortly after the
adjournment of the Convention, and Mr. Storrs addressed the
Republicans there assembled as follows :
489
49O LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
"As I look about on this platform and in the body of this very fine
hall, I see many of the most conclusive evidences of the wisdom of the
Republican Convention which has recently been held at Cincinnati in the
nomination of Hayes and Wheeler. I see many of my good old Liberal
friends returned to the Republican fold. [Applause.] I welcome them
back. [Cheers.] I am sorry that they ever left — I am glad that they
have returned. [Cheers.] My friends were foolish, fiut after having
learned that the adventure of the Prodigal Son always results in a husk
dividend [laughter], it is to be hoped that in future we will stand
together as we do to-night, and as we will in the canvass upon the
threshold of which we are just standing. We will come to the conclusion
that the Republican party is strong and virtuous enough to effect its own
reforms, and that one of the poorest methods on earth to reform the Repub
lican party is by voting the Democratic ticket. [Cheers.] I think it is well
for us to be here. I know, after the nomination is made, no distinctions
between men and individual preferences, and I was glad to hear from my
brother Smith, who has been for so many years an ardent and enthusiastic
Republican, that the nomination of Hayes and Wheeler has secured to us
without question the vote of the Bristow Club. [Cheers.] There was never
any danger about the Blaine men, nor the Conkling men. [Laughter and
cheers.] Nothing was ever said in better part, and I see you have taken
it in good part. [Renewed cheers.]
"I ratify the nomination of Hayes and Wheeler, of course, because
they are both good men, because they are both fit men, because they
are both men unassailed and unassailable, and, gentlemen, I ratify the
nomination of Hayes and Wheeler for another reason — because they are
the Republican nominees. [Cheers.] I would not vote for Hayes or
Wheeler, or any other man running on a Democratic ticket. I have
that confidence — that sublime and perfect confidence — that in a tight
place and in a delicate position, the Democratic party will do the wrong
thing as a party, — that no nomination that they could possibly make
could combine in itself virtue enough in the candidates to overcome the
inherent cussedness of that great aggregation of men. [Cheers and
laughter.] I am for the Republican nominees because the Republican
party is as good as the nominees [laughter] ; because, taken as a great
mass, it represents the loyal sentiment and the patriotism and the honest
desire for reform in this country. I believe that the Republican party,
as a party organization, with all its mistakes, with all its errors, and with
all its shortcomings, has within itself to clean the Augean stable, to elevate
our civil service, and to march all the time, if not a little ahead, fully
abreast of a wise and honest public sentiment. [Cheers.] When the
Republican party ceases to be a party of movement, and forward move
ment, it will cease to be the Republican party. It was a party organized
not for a day, but for all time. It takes things as it finds them, but
it never leaves them as it finds them. It found 4,000,000 of chattels — it
has made 4,000,000 of voters in their place. [Cheers.] It found a great
nation, the hope of civil liberty all over the globe, struggling in the
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1876. 49 1
arms of a gigantic rebellion, and it carried it safely through its flaming
perils, and has guaranteed to our Republic the etwnity of success and
glory. [Cheers.] It found a depreciated and almost exploded currency,
and a crippled national credit. Steadily and persistently it began eight years
ago to denounce the fraudulent conception that our national debt should
be paid in greenbacks; it has never swerved a moment from the course
it then took ; it has pursued it unceasingly ever since, and it will never
abandon the question until the word of the United States finds its redemp
tion in coin, in the currency of the world. [Cheers.]
"I agree thoroughly with what your President has so well said as to
the demands of the people. I go a little further than my good friend
Mr. Larned. It is impossible that all the reforms which the people
demand shall be wrought out by the election of Hayes and Wheeler, or
by that of anybody else. Their election is simply the expression of the
public will that there shall be a reform. An honest man standing at the
head of the Government and backed up by a constituency which has a
lack of moral sympathy with him is as helpless as a baby. But it is
because we have a leader fit for the party and a party fit for the
leader, that reform is not only possible, but is easy. I cannot forget
our party and its greatness and its glory. I would as soon tear from
my heart the recollection of my% old home, the dearest thing of my life,
as to forget the glories of the great party with which I have voted from
the time I was a boy. I approve and ratify these nominations, because
they represent the average sense and the best matured judgment of the
whole people of the whole country. It was wise policy, because upon
that altar there is laid every bitterness of feeling, every animosity, and
every heart-burning engendered by that long and great Convention. The
inference is that the men Morton and Conkling and Elaine and Bristow are
buried out of sight, and the old Republican party that has carried the ban
ner of the nation since 1860, stronger than ever, united, and without a
dissenting voice, is as sure of triumph as the sun is to rise at dawn to-mor
row. [Cheers.]
"It has been my habit .in looking at political questions, when I was in
doubt as to the best course to pursue, to see what the Democratic party
desired, and then select the opposite. [Laughter.] I am perfectly certain
that we have followed the wisest course, because the nomination of Hayes
and Wheeler has unlimbered their every gun, and demoralized the crowd.
They must seek for a great unknown, but, Mr. President, there is one thing
that is known, and that is the Rebel record of the party which the great
unknown must head. The past of their career weighs down upon them like
a mountain load, and no man, snatched from any obscurity however great,
can carry that record forward safely, and triumph in the face of the united
Republicanism of the nation which we see to-day.
"I observe that they say that our candidates are colorless. Good. It
is probably because their garments are absolutely white. There is no
genius for plunder, no audacity for rings. We belong to that party which
to-day has an "infinitely profounder belief in the goodness of God than it
492 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORRS.
ever had in the dexterity of the Devil. Our party platform is so clear
that everybody understands it. Reform in administration ; not work to be
accomplished by a spurt ; one election does not achieve it. The army
capture an outpost, but the citadel of corruption for which our party is
not responsible — of that corruption which began and gathered strength a
quarter of a century ago — will never surrender without the most unwear
ied, patient, and persistent exertion. Every man — every private in the
ranks — can contribute his mite in that direction. A reform of our civil
service ; how, and exactly by what method, we will tell by one experi
ment after another, if experiment be necessary, until the result be achieved.
An honest currency, the redemption of our promises to pay in coin by the
fulfilment of the national engagements, — these are the principles upon
which the Republican party stands to-day, absolutely unchallengeable,
and they commend themselves to the good judgment and the loftier
patriotism of the whole people.
"This nomination has been received by no sudden outburst of enthusiasm,
no gush, no gust, such as sometimes goes out, but take my word for it
that it will grow every hour and every day, and every week as the
campaign lengthens out and as the summer comes on, as the Democratic
candidate and the party — whomsoever that candidate may be — shall be
before us to be riddled, we will find that the Convention at Cincinnati,
disappointed as thousands of us were even, worked for the best in the
nominations which it had made.
"Fellow-citizens, honest men, of experience in public affairs, we can
ask nothing more, nothing better ; and, united once again, Liberals, Inde
pendents, and altogether, as in the good old days that are past, we
will roll up, when the November election comes, such a majority for
the Republican ticket as will gladden the friends of good Government all
over the globe. [Loud and prolonged applause.]"
On the 1 4th of July, he addressed a large and enthusiastic
meeting at Aurora, Illinois, and criticised very keenly and minutely
the sophistical platform which the Democrats had adopted at the
St. Louis Convention, and which Mr. Storrs characterized as "the
cheekiest platform ever witnessed in political history or literature."
The concluding part of his speech was devoted to a telling
review of Mr. Tilden's record. Mr. Storrs spoke as follows:
• "It has been my pleasure, for every political canvass of any national
importance since 1861, to address the Republicans of this growing and
this very beautiful city, and, I by no means feel that I am among
strangers, for as I look about I see those whom I saw on the first occasion
I ever visited Aurora, who have stood with me during those long and
terrible years of the war. I see those who never faltered when dangers
of the most serious character threatened us. I see those to-night who,
after the war had closed, were as resolute that the fruits of our victory
should be gathered and garnered as they were that those effects should
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 8/6. 493
•
be, in the first instance, achieved. I see those who have always been
Republicans ever since there has been a Republican party, and who always
will be Republicans as long as there is a Democratic party. When I
am asked, as I sometimes am, how long the Republican party will live,
1 say it will live at least one election after the final and eternal death
of the Democracy [loud cheers], — for so long as the Democratic party
keeps above ground and exhibits any signs of vitality, so long is the
existence of the Republican party a military necessity. [Cheers. J It will
not — this Democratic party — always endure, for we are a great evangeli
zing and missionary agency. We began the good work of converting that
party in 1860, and we have been pursuing that purpose steadily and
persistently and unwaveringly ever since. Thousands and hundreds of
thousands of those original Democrats have been converted to Republi
canism and are now safely within the ample folds of the Republican
party.
" Ever since 1860, gentlemen, the Democrats have been just four years
behind us. In 1864 they practically adopted our platform of 1860; in
1868 they adopted our platform of 1864; in 1872 they adopted our platform
of 1868; and in 1876 they have adopted our platform of 1872. It works
well. [Laughter.] It is a hard pull; it is a long pull; it is a strong pull.
They are obstinate, but so thorough is my belief in the power of truth that
I think Mr. Harrington and John Farnsworth may be again both back in
the Republican fold. [Cheers and laughter.] Speaking of conversion, just
think of it: the Democratic party is opposed to stealing. [Laughter.] In
1876 this party, whose record is one of the most stupendous and gigantic
larcenies ever charged up against a political organization, solemnly declare that
they are opposed to larceny. [Renewed laughter.] It is possible, it is probable,
that there are members of the Republican party who have individually been
guilty of corrupt pratices ; but, on the general question of stealing, the
impounding of a keg of nails or a bolt of cloth, is a very small affair, my
good friends, when compared with the running off with a whole nationality. The
Democracy undertook to steal the Government of the United States ; Belk-
nap traded in a post-tradership situation. Why, we might keep on indus
triously in the line of stealing Belknap pursued until the crack of doom,
and the Democracy might stop to-day, and there would .be a large margin
yet left in our favor.
"They complain of us that we are waving the 'bloody shirt,' that we
will not let by-gones be by-gones, and that we are continually singing
the same old song, and making the same old speeches. It is unfortunate that
it is so, but the misfortune arises from the fact that it is necessary it should be
so. When one of my dear, deluded Democratic friends says, 'For God's sake,
why don't you stop talking these same old things? ' I say, 'For God's sake, why
don't you stop being that same old party?' [Cheers.] We must talk
about the antecedents and the history of the Democratic party, because
the party of to-day is the same party, identical in material, identical in
its membership, identical in its spirit, identical in its traditions, identical
in all its purposes— the same old party that declared that the great
494 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
chart of American liberties was a glittering generality, that scoffed at
patriotic feeling as a delusion and a sham, that asserted the right of
secession, that involved this nation in rebellion the most stupendous in its
purposes that the world ever witnessed, that obstructed the fair and patri
otic reconstruction of these States, that attempted the repudiation of the
national debt and the destruction of the national credit. [Cheers.] It is
the same old party that has been guilty of all these crimes and offenses,
and the men who now make up that organization, and give it tone, and
character, and life, and the vigor that it possesses, are the individual men
who have been guilty of all those political offenses which ought to have
consigned them to eternal political oblivion. [Loud cheers.] In the nature
of things the Democratic party must expect to face its terrific record. It
comes once every four years before the people of this country, and demands
their recognition and confidence. It certainly cannot demand the confidence
of this people by what it proposes to do in the future, for it is necessarily
a party of violated promises and broken faith. It cannot demand the con
fidence of this people by what it has done in the past, for its career has
been a blood-stained and destructive career. [Cheers.] The Democratic
party comes before the people of this country to-day and asks that it shall
have the management of our national debt, the control of the national
finances, and be intrusted with what it calls the reform of both. It makes
loud and lofty promises of its performances in the future. But as wise men,
as absolutely unimpassioned men, if such a thing were possible in the pre
sence of questions so great in their magnitude — as wise men, I say, we
must take you, not by the assurances you make to-day, but by your per
formances in the long past which stretches behind you.
"Understand, my friends, — and I am not finding fault with the Demo
cratic party, — that they complain of us that we persistently attack their
record. If we had such a record as theirs wouldn't we be anxious
to bury it? If they had such a record as ours wouldn't they be anxious
to exploit it? If behind us were blighted faith, violated honor, ruined
homes, ruined credit, wars, rebellions, treasons — if that was the record
that this Republican party had made, we would deafen our ears and
call upon the mountains to fall upon and bury us rather than hear it
denounced or commented upon. But the Republican party glories to talk
of its record, — it is a glorious record to talk about, — and the Democratic
party hides its head when it is mentioned, because it is a record in the
presence of which every patriotic head ought to be bowed. The party has
not changed ; its character has not changed ; its membership has not
changed. It is a question beyond and infinitely above the mere personal
characteristics of the men placed in nomination.
"You are here to-night to ratify the nomination of Hayes and Wheeler.
Their nomination was wise. It is a nomination which combined all the ele
ments of the Republican party. It brought the Liberals back home. It
brought the Independents back home. If there are any Liberals or Inde
pendents here to-night who wandered off with Greeley in 1872, I say to
them, 'We open wide the door; we bid you welcome, only don't do so any
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 8/6. 495
more." [Laughter and cheers.] If, my friends, you desire to reform the
Republican partjtr don't, for Heaven's sake, try to do it by voting the Dem
ocratic ticket; it is the poorest way in the world to attempt anything of the
kind. You are all back, safely housed in that glorious old Republican tem
ple, the walls of which are decked with the most heroic achievements of the
past century, with a record that is as enduring as time, and history will
never willingly let die — that splendid temple whose dome is lifted even
among the very stars, and whose foundations are as secure as the eternal
rocks — you are back again within it, and see that no inscription ever goes
upon those walls, that nothing is emblazoned thereon, except such as can
shine along with the deeds that already adorn it. [Cheers.]
"We are to-day a united, a powerful, and — I feel it in the air — a victor
ious party. It is the same old organization, with the same old patriotic
fire and nerve that has carried this great nationality through the Rebellion
and saved it. It is the same party that faced the results of its own logic
as courageously as the young David of old faced the great Goliath. It
knew in its early days — and it knows to-day — neither ' variableness nor shadow
of turning.' It found the negro a slave, it made him free. Making him a
free man it made him a citizen. Making him a citizen it clothed him with
all the rights and privileges of citizenship, even unto the power of voting.
True still to its trust, what it said in 1868 it said again in 1872. No talk
about negro equality or competition could frighten it; and to-day we have
through the agency of* the Republican party a nationality — not a mere
aggregation of States, but a nationality, the United States of America,
powerful enough and always willing to protect the poorest and meanest of
its subjects even in the remotest quarter of the globe when his liberty is
assailed. The old party said, 'The men whom we have made free men,
citizens, voters, we will protect, if the States in which they live will not
protect them. If the States in which they live will not protect them this
General Government, which we call the United States of America, will pro
tect them.' And that promise the Republican party of the United States
with the help of God proposes to keep. Down to to-day we have come.
The great debt, which hung like an incubus upon us, is gradually melting
away — taxation reduced, coming back by slow degrees, but sure, neverthe
less, to the good old times when the basis of our currency was specie.
We may look with the most perfect and absolute confidence that at no very
distant period of time, with the debt placed beyond all doubt, the integrity
of the nation thoroughly vindicated, its faith absolutely approved, our cur
rency recognized all over the globe, good times come again, spindles turn
ing as they were before, mills in full blast, business prospering, no bond
man on the soil of the Republic — at no very distant day, all these splendid
results we may look upon as the natural outcome of the policy of the
Republican party.
"The Democratic party have had a convention in the City of St. Louis.
I need not describe it to you, but at the expense of being possibly some
what tedious permit me to suggest that we stand at the very threshold of
the canvass, and it may be well for us to read the St. Louis platform, or
496 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
portions of it. The platform of the Democracy says: 'We, the Democratic
delegates .' It is important to get that in, for page after page, and page
after page follows in denunciation of the Republican party and in the demand
for reform. When you read volumes of denunciations you inquire, 'Who is
it that denounces?' When you read volumes of clamor for reform you
naturally inquire, 'who is it that is clamoring for reform?' If it turns out
that the name of Judas Iscariot is signed at the bottom of the paper, and
he demands the utmost fidelity to sworn engagements and sacred ness of
trust, you say, ' Such a demand, proceeding from that source, is probably
hollow.' When you read a platform headed, 'We, the Democratic dele-,
gates,' congratulating the nation on its freedom from the perils of civil
war, and demanding reform, etc., you say, 'That is as cheeky and
impudent as the proclamation of Judas would have been — it would ' pale
its ineffectual fires' before such a document as this.' [Cheers.]
"Now, what do 'We, the Democratic- delegates,' say? They say:
' Reform is necessary to rebuild and establish in the hearts of the whole
people of the Union, eleven years ago happily rescued from the danger
of a secession of States.' 'We, the Democratic delegates,' two-thirds of
whom were in favor of the secession of States, one-half of whom fought
that that secession of States might succeed, get together in national con
vention in St. Louis, and say that ' reform is necessary to rebuild and
establish' a nation 'happily saved from the perils of secession!' which
they undertook to inaugurate and carry out. [Loud cheers.]
"Is further comment necessary on that? Is further comment possible?
Let us go a little further. As Squeers says, 'Here is richness.' [Laughter.]
What have we next? ' 'But now to be saved from a corrupt centralism.'
" Can anybody tell me what that means. Now, if centralism is something
very bad, I am opposed to it ; if it is something very good, I am in favor
of it. If it is something about between the two, I don't take much interest
in it. But what do they mean by 'corrupt centralism'? Precisely this:
' We the Democratic delegates, we Ben Hill, we Fitzhugh Lee, we Henry
Clay Dean, congratulate the country upon its happy rescue from the perils
of secession,' and insist upon it that this ' corrupt centralism ' must cease to
be. This corrupt centralism, my friends, is this: It is that inner power
which inheres in the General Government, which is to that extent central,
which whipped eleven States back into their traces. This 'corrupt cen
tralism,' is that central power which I call the Government of the United
States — this great nation, not like a lot of marbles in a bag that touch,
but do not adhere, but 'distinct like the billows, and one like the sea.'
This centralism is our national heart and existence itself. It is that cen
tralism which, while with its strong right arm it bound up 3,000 miles of
sea-coast in rebellion, sent its hundreds and thousands of conquering legions
to the South, and vindicated our national existence, at the same time with
its left scattered all over the North all the blessings of a time of beneficent
peace.
"'We, the Democratic delegates,' — let me not miss it — hope to be saved
from 'corrupt centralism.' It is the same centralism which, after the war
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1876. 497
had closed, had the courage to say, 'This war was not a joke ; it has cost
us $3,000,000,000 and 500,000 lives ; it was a gigantic trial of strength between
ideas, and the idea for which you have fought has been beaten in the last
court to which you can take a contest — the arbitrament of war — and it must
perish. Your doctrine of State Rights is buried, — your right of secession is
buried with the sword and gun with which you fought.' It is the same cen
tralism which said ' We cannot afford, we will not afford, to place this nation
in peril again, but way down in the very fountains, buried in the Constitu
tion, where the freaks of a Confederate Congress cannot reach it, we will
secure the fruits of this contest where they will be safe for all time to come.'
That is the 'corrupt centralism.' [Loud cheers.] It is the 'corrupt central
ism' which took 'we, the Democratic delegates,' by the throat in 1864 and
choked them into silence and submission. It is the ' corrupt centralism ' .
which met the infamous proclamation in 1868 of the repudiation of the
national debt and annihilated it. It is ' corrupt centralism,' made up of this
loyal nation, North and South, which proposes that every engagement shall
be kept and every national promise faithfully performed.
"But let us go on with the platform. When the platform ceases to be
ridiculous, it will become false, as I will show you. 'We, the Democratic
delegates,' further say 'reform is necessary to establish a sound currency.'
What does that mean? Don't they like our currency? Do they want to
abolish the greenback and go back to the State bank system? Do they
want to abolish the National Bank note ? The currency is sound enough ;
nobody complains of that. The simple question is as to the time and man
ner for the resumption of specie payments. But we will go a little further.
'We denounce,' — here it comes again. 'We the Democratic party,' — 'the
failure.' That has a familiar sound. In 1864 I remember Mr. Tilden de
nounced another failure. For instance :
' Resolved, That this Convention does explicitly declare as the sense of the
American people, that after four years of failure,' etc.
"So you see that is a favorite word with them. In 1876 they 'denounce
the failure for all these eleven years to make good the promise of the legal-
tender notes, which are a changing standard of value in the hands of the
people, and the non-payment of which is a disregard of the plighted faith
of the nation.' Then again, 'We,' — the Democratic delegates — 'the finan
cial imbecility and immorality.' The Democratic delegates talking about
financial immorality ! What in the name of all the gods are we coming to
when the people of this country are to learn lessons of morality from the
Democratic party ? ' We — the delegates of the Democratic party in National
Convention assembled,' — 'we denounce the imbecility and immorality of that
party which during eleven years of peace has made no advance toward
resumption and no preparation for resumption.' The simple trouble with
this is that is just as false as it can be. That is all there is about it. What,
my friends, has been the trouble with this business of resumption? 'We,
the Democratic delegates,' shut their eyes absolutely to the whole history of
the past, and denounce the Republican party, because for eleven years it
has made no preparation for resumption, and taken no step toward it. What
32
498 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
have they done? In 1866, again in 1868, going into a national canvass
they demanded the payment of the Government bonds in greenbacks, which
would not only have utterly destroyed the national credit, but would have
of necessity so inflated the national currency that the resumption of specie
would have been eternally and everlastingly postponed. And yet this party,
with the smell of repudiation on its garments, with the recent history of the
Indiana and Ohio campaigns fresh in the minds of the people, with their
miserable record behind them of a steady, persistent, wilful opposition to
and interference with every scheme which looked to the re-establishment of
the national credit and the payment of the national debt — they denounce
the Republican party for imbecility or immorality, because it has taken no
step in that direction! Let us see what the facts are. What was gold in
.1865? What is gold to-day? Have we made no advance toward resump
tion during the last eleven years? This truthful platform says we have not.
Gold was in the neighborhood of 150 in 1865 ; it is 112 or thereabouts to-day.
Is not that a long step forward? Is it not an immense stride in advance
that this growing nation has taken ? How is the debt ? Has it taken any
step forward in that direction ? In the eleven years of which this lying plat
form speaks, this Republican party which is denounced for its imbecility and
immorality, has paid the enormous sum of £456,000,000 of the national debt.
[Cheers.] Has it taken no step in the way of decrease of the expenditures?
Our appropriations have been reduced from 1874 to 1875 over #27, 000,000.
Our expenditures in 1866 were $520,000,000, and in 1873 they were #290,
000,000. Gold reduced from 200 to 112: $456,000,000 of the national
debt paid ; hundreds of millions of taxation removed from the shoulders
of the people; our bonds largely appreciated in every money-mart in the
world; and yet 'we, the Democratic delegates,' in National Convention
assembled, solemnly denounce and arraign the Republican party for tak
ing no steps towards making the promise of the legal-tender notes good !
[Cheers.]
"My good friends, figures sometimes become very eloquent, and in this
connection they are eloquent. Let me read a little more of figures. Our
tariffs have been so that the people hardly feel the burden ; every expense
of the Government has been so removed that the burden is but lightly felt
to-day. Our internal taxes that would have been paid in the several years
had the laws remained unchanged under Grant's Administration, calculated
on the basis of the taxes collected in 1868, would have been in 1869, $63,-
919,416; in 1870, $58,295,182; in 1871, $92,726,132; in 1872, $110,810,083;
in 1873, $123,533,307, etc. In 1877 there would have been collected on that
basis $129,700,000. This shows a saving, an absolute decrease of the taxa
tion on an average of $104,696,190 per year during the last eight years.
[Cheers.] And yet the Republican party, which has accomplished those
magnificent results, is denounced by the ' Democratic delegates ' as guilty
of imbecility and immorality ! But that is not all. ' We, the Democratic
delegates,' also say that 'reform is necessary in the scale of public expense.
Our Federal taxation has swollen from $60,000,000 gold in 1860 to $450,-
000,000 currency in 1870.' I ask you, gentlemen, whose fault is it that the
THE CAMPAIGN OF 18/6. 499
expenses of this Government have 'swollen from $60,000,000 gold in 1860
to $450,000,000 currency in 1870?' Uo 'we, the Democratic delegates/
forget the fact that $157,000,000 per year of the expenses which this people
have been compelled to bear are put upon us because of this Democratic
Rebellion? [Cheers.] Yet, reading this platform, where 'we, the Democratic
delegates, 'demand reform, you would never dream that there had been a
war; one would have supposed from 1860 down to to-day it had been a
long summer day of peace, and that this profligate party, with no unusual
reasons for expenditure, had run up the national expenditures from $60,000,-
000 to $450,000,000 per year, while the fact is that the political organization
that denounces us because of that frightful increase upon the burdens of
this people is itself the guilty cause and agent through which that increase
was made a necessity. [Cheers.] It is the war that has imposed those
terrible burdens upon us, and while you are sweating and groaning over
them Ben Hill comes up from Georgia, and Henry Clay Dean from Iowa,
and denounces the mild men of Kane County because, in putting down
their rebellion, they were compelled to incur additional millions of expense.
1 say it is the cheekiest platform ever witnessed in political history or litera
ture. [Cheers.] Why, I would suppose that whenever the occasion occurred
you could not drive a Democrat into the mention of the tremendous burdens
under which the people are laboring, for right back of us looms up the
memory of this great Rebellion ! Right back, fresh in our minds is the
memory of the war which compelled us to raise the expenditures of the
country. It is none of their business how much that war cost. Treated as
they deserved to have been treated, as any other nationality would have
treated them, this $157,000,000, which the people of this country have been
compelled to pay since that time as a yearly burden for putting down and
crushing the Rebellion, would have been shouldered by the Democratic
party and paid by them even to the confiscation of every thing they
possessed.
"I suppose that in the interests of conciliation we must submit to it with
out murmuring ; but it does seem hard that the recently-reconstructed
Confederates assembled at St. Louis, and doing business under the name,
style, and firm of 'We, the delegates of the Democratic party,' should
denounce us because, as they say, we expended more money in putting
down their Rebellion, and in whipping them back into the Union, than was
absolutely necessary.
"We next come to the question of defalcations. The history upon this
point is very short. One would think, from the clamor that is made, that
corruption was in every branch of the public service, — that there was not
an official anywhere who was not guilty either of stealing public funds or
of taking corrupt money. This, my friends, you will pardon me for suggest
ing, is a great deal bigger nation than it was fifty years ago. We collect
and expend to-day millions of money where we handled and expended only
thousands half a century ago. I am one of those sanguine men who believe
that this world is all the time getting better. I believe that even the Dem
ocratic party is slowly improving. [Laughter.] It is a great deal better
5<DO LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
world, officially considered, than it was in the days of Old Hickory, it has
improved since the days of Martin Van Buren, it is an immense improve
ment over Polk, it is a great ways ahead of James Buchanan's time. The
fact of the matter is just this: There is not a first-class merchant in the
.City of Aurora who does not lose by little petty defalcations on the actual
amount of his business a much larger sum of money than does the United
States on the enormous expenditures it has been compelled to make under
Grant's administration. Now I wjll read from an authentic report the his
tory of all those proceedings: 'The losses on every $1,000 of disbursements
were, in the Administration of Jackson, $10.55; Van Buren, $21.15; Harri-.
son, $10.37; Polk, $8.34; Taylor, and FUlmore, $7.64 ; Pierce, -$5.86 ; Buch
anan, nearly $6.98; Lincoln, $1.41 ; Johnson, 48 cents; Grant, the first four
years, 40 cents, the second four years, 26 cents.' [Loud cheers.] That, my
good friends, is the veritable record, and it is an immensely satisfactory
one. [Cheers.] It is a record, however, that you would not dream of
amid the clamor and clatter made about thievery in every branch of
the public service.
"We are asked if we approve of Grant, and i'f we indorse him. I do
not suddenly change my opinion of men. I have yet this to say : that
when the memory of 'We, the Democratic delegates,' shall have perished
in oblivion and forgetfulness, when the generations to come will have for
gotten that such men ever lived, the real, solid, patriotic achievements of
U. S. Grant will, growing brighter and brighter as the years wear away,
make a record for him that shall be absolutely imperishable. [Loud and
continued cheering.] In all this terrible storm of obloquy — and no man
has ever suffered more in the frightful flood of calumny which has been
poured upon us — silent, and patient, and steady has he sat, conscious that
the hearts of the people beat with and for him, and conscious in his own
heart that he never breathed a breath that was not a patriotic one, and
never entertained a purpose, so far as this great nation was concerned, that
was not patriotic as well. I pass to another branch of the Democratic
platform, and I hope I am not wearying you. You have to go through all
this some day, and we may as well take it up to-night. They speak of
some ' false issues' :
"'The false issue by which they seek to light anew the dying embers
of sectional hate. . . . All these abuses, wrongs, and crimes, the product
of sixteen years' ascendancy of the Republican party.'
"My Republican friends, will you stop to think of that? 'All these
abuses, wrongs, and crimes, the product of sixteen years' ascendancy of
the Republican party!' That carries us away back to 1860; carries us
back to when many of us were boys; carries us back when the great party
was new, and fresh, and young; carries us back to the time when with the
watchword ' Liberty ' on our banners we won our first great victory ; carries
us back to the time of Lincoln ; carries us back to those years of trouble
through which we passed ; and the Democratic party, ' we the Democratic
delegates in National Convention assembled,' speak of that ascendancy —
the ascendancy of Lincoln, his first and second term, the first term of
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 8/6. 5OI
Grant, the whole history of reconstruction — speak of that as a history of
'abuses, wrongs, and crimes,' which 'we, the Democratic delegates,1 pur
pose and intend to reform! [Laughter.] And yet they say, 'Let the dead
past bury its dead — forget these old issues.' At the same time there comes
trooping up from the South, from every Confederate cross-roads, the bearer
of a Confederate heart, filled full of Confederate hopes, believing that the
Lost Cause is finally won, flaunting in the face of this great nation, just
out of its terrible perils, the denunciation of sixteen years of wrong, outrage,
and crime of this Republican party ! If this Democrat. c party, insulting
the grandest history of the nation in that charge, insulting the memory of
the heroic dead and the heroic living as it does, could take some visible
shape, would not the strong Republican army of Kane County, with the
old nerve and vigor and its old heart back of it, feel like grinding it into
powder ? We can bear taxation ; our treasures may be sunk into the seas,
but this glorious record, which challenges the admiration of all the world,
and which is the work of a great loyal people, shall not be spit upon and
defiled by ' We, the Democratic delegates in National Convention assem
bled.' You cannot smite it directly, but, carrying this infamous charge in
your hearts, keeping it warm on your lips, when the day of November
comes, go up to the polls and say to them, ' You, the Democratic delegates
that sought the destruction of this great nation, we repel your slander and
now bury you for eternity.'
"Now what are the 'false issues?' Let us see. A word or two about
sectional hate. What is the danger from sectional hate — from what source
does that danger spring ? You have seen some exhibitions of it- in the past
and during the present session of Congress, when the old fires of rebellion
have been rekindled, when the old illustrators of plantation manners again
appear on the floor of the House, and when unrepentant rebellion flaunts
its horrid front in the face of the people, and denounces the nation and
the party that crushed that Rebellion to atoms — Hill, Lamar, all the promi
nent leaders of secession back again into the councils of the nation they
sought to destroy ! And in the presence of such magnanimity as that we
have this sympathetic blubber about bloody-shirt, etc. Do you suppose
that there would have been one prominent improvement, national in its
character, made, had this Democratic party which to-day prates of Reform
succeeded since 1860? Contemplate such a result as their successr, if you
can without shuddering. Think of the success of the Democratic party
in 1864! Down from its high pedestal our nation would have come?
Home would have come our conquering legions, with their banners
trailing in the dust and in the mire of defeat! The dishonor and
disruption of the nationality — that would have been the sure result had
the promises of Democratic reform been listened to by the people, and
had their solicitation for public confidence met with any response in
1864. Then, again, 1868. Contemplate, if you can, their success then.
Every measure for the reconstruction of the nation which they sought to
destroy would have been rendered utterly fruitless, our gigantic debt
would have been rendered still more gigantic, our credit would have
5<D2 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
been gone, and we would have been to-day a disgraced and discredited
nationality in the eyes of the whole world. In 1872, think of the calam
ities that would have followed a Democratic triumph, when one of
their own candidates pronounced the reconstructive measures ' revolution
ary, unconstitutional, and void.' What has occurred to make the evil
of a Democratic success less to-day? What has occurred to make the
necessity of a Republican triumph less imperative now, than it has been
every hour since 1860? The time has not come when this ideal sentiment
of hand-shaking shall take the place of that recognition of principles
which the great emergencies of the occasion demand. And what has the
Republican platform said that calls from the Democrats these reproaches?
This is all: 'We sincerely deprecate all sectional feeling and tendencies.
We, therefore, note with deep solicitude that the Democratic party counts,
as its chief hope of its success, upon the electoral vote of a united South.'
It is, my fellow-citizens, its only hope. The success of the Democratic party
means a united South, secured at the expense of the colored vote. It
makes an appeal for that Southern vote directly, as in the days of old,
to sectional prejudices and sectional hate. It means that every newly-
made citizen shall be deprived of the privileges which he is entitled to
under the Constitution. Well, I shall not appeal to any sectional feeling,
but to the broad, catholic spirit of nationality — the Republican party
demands the suffrage of every citizen North and South, East and West,
black and white, — every citizen, of whatsoever race he may originally have
been, who desires the largest, truest, broadest measure of national prosperity
for the land we love so justly and so well.
"•Now, about this wretched platform. They have lost none of their old
differences. They are the same old issues. It is the bitter, intense spirit of
State Rights working agairfst a distinct and united nationality that has been
waging war for the long years that are passed. W7e stand upon the threshold
of a new century. We will inaugurate it well, I am sure, and say that this
nation, one and indivisible, shall be perpetuated.
"Upon this platform of 'WTe, the Democratic delegates,' they have placed
in nomination Mr. Samuel J. Tilden, of the City of New York, as their
exemplar and illustrator of reform. What has he done ? Who is Samuel J .
Tilden? One of the most expert railroad lawyers on the continent. That is
not a first-class recommendation. A man thoroughly imbued with the cor
poration spirit, so completely that, like the client which he represents, he
has no soul. [Renewed laughter and cheers.] It has ordinarily been the
case that physicians are prospered in proportion as they have cured their
patients. He is a great railroad doctor — the great corporation physician ;
but all precedent in his case is abolished, — the patients have died and the
physician has prospered. Wherever and whenever Samuel J. Tilden has
been called to stand by the bed-side of a sick railroad, there was a funeral
in the near future. He is the father of watered stock. He is the great
absorber and absorbent. He is the author of farm mortgage bonds, and I
don't need to explain to you what those instruments mean. There never
yet came into the door of his office a healthy corporation which did not
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1876. 503
hobble out from the other door on crutches and in bandages. [Laughter
and cheers.] All along, up and down this great West, are the wrecks of dis
appointed hopes and blasted expectations that stockholders and corporations
have had, when they have passed through the gentle but death-dealing
treatment of the man Tilden. He is a Democratic politician of the highest
and lowest type. In 1864 he was a Democratic politician. We are told that
our'candidate, Governor Hayes, is a man of very ordinary abilities. I thank God
that he did not have genius enough to have been in the McClellan Conven
tion of 1864. Take the two men — one a man of genius and the other a man
of ordinary talent. In that year the man of ordinary talent had telegraphed,
in reply to the inquiries of his friends, in his ordinary way, having merely
a patriotic desire to do his duty, as follows :
'"I have other business to attend to now. Any man who leaves the
army to electioneer for a seat in Congress ought to be scalped.' [Cheers.]
"At the same time, almost as the wires were throbbing with Hayes*
dispatch to his friends in Ohio, Samuel J. Tilden, the great railroad physi
cian, put the signet of his approval upon this infamous declaration ; ' Resolved,
That this Convention does explicitly declare, as the sense of the American
people, that after four years of failure to restore the Union by the experi
ment of war — during which, under the pretense of a military necessity or
war power higher than the Constitution, the Constitution itself has been disre
garded in every part, and public liberty and private right alike trodden down,
and the material prosperity of the country essentially impaired — justice, human
ity, liberty, and the public welfare demand that immediate efforts be made
for a cessation of hostilities, with a view to an ultimate convention of the
States, or other peaceable means, to the end that at the earliest practicable
moment peace may be restored on the basis of the Federal States.'
"Samuel J. Tilden, a war man in time of peace, a peace man in time of
war! Manton Marble says in a letter, addressed to a delegate from Illinois,
that while Tilden was on that day present at the deliberations of the Com
mittee he in no way lifted up his voice against that resolution, yet down in
the bottom of his heart, Mr. Marble says, there was a deep feeling against
that resolution, which he always discreetly kept to himself. Was it true ?
If, as Mr. John Farnsworth says, Tilden is a resolute, high-toned man,
who spurns all leaders, who will not be dictated to, I think he would have
risen in his power and might, and said to the framers of that resolution:
' Get thee behind me, Satan. I won't have the resolution, and will make
a minority report.' But he did nothing of the kind. When the Convention
grew restive over the fact that the platform had not been presented, Mr.
Tilden rose in his place and said : « We are all agreed. There is no con
troversy in the Committee ; there is no disagreement there ; we are await
ing only its revision by the Sub-Committee.' He was followed in that state
ment by other members of the Committee, and Mr. Guthrie solemnly rose
to his Kentucky feet, and said : • There is no disagreement, and Kentucky
declares that we are all Kentucky ously unanimous for peace.'
"There is the record of Samuel J. Tilden back in 1864. Let the dead
past bury its dead! Don't wave the bloody shirt! Yet, Mr. Tilden, this
504 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORRS.
very platform on which you stand to-day, which you must have written
yourself, denounces the wrongs and crimes of the Republican party of that
very time! Now, don't you tell us to close our mouths about your wrongs !
Remember that very period of time !
"Gentlemen, I might bring myself to such a frame of mind as to vote
for a Confederate. I can understand how a man living in the South might
have voted for the South; but not until my heart has ceased to beat, not
until my whole being is changed, will I ever, on any ticket, nor under any
circumstances, cast my suffrages for a man living in the North, who, in
1864, denounced the war as an experiment, as a failure, and abjectly and
meanly sued for peace ! I follow him still further, back to the State of
New York — worse than that, back to the City of New York — back to the
embrace of Hoffman and Tweed — back to the associations he seemed to
love so well. Chairman of the Central Committee, he approved and aided
in the most stupendous frauds upon the rights of franchise ever committed
by any party, [Cheers] — a great fraud, which wrested the State of New
York from the Republicans to whom it belonged, and polled in four wards
over 20,000 fraudulent votes. This was done under the direction of the
modern reformer, the friends of peace in 1864, Samuel J. Tilden ! I go still
further. The gigantic robberies of that great ring had finally excited the
alarm of the whole nation. During the time when millions and millions
were being shamelessly plundered from the people of New York, the Chair
man of the State Central Committee, the recipient of Tweed's bounty, was
curiously and marvelously silent. But this Republican press, Republican
speakers, the Republican party, denounced and denounced again and
again those gigantic frauds. A great newspaper brought them to light ;
exposure came, the lightnings of public wrath visited the head of Tweed
and his gang. When escape from detection was no longer possible, then
from behind the loop-holes of his safe retreat, from behind his barricade
of law books and railroad bonds, Tilden comes forth as a patriotic
reformer and demands the punishment of Boss Tweed! [Cheers.J The
Republican carriage was all ready, and he jumped in and rode! Is he
entitled to the credit? [Cries of 'No, No!'] As I said the other night,
the whole history is in a nutshell. Tweed was tried by a Republican
Judge, before a Republican jury, prosecuted by a Republican Attorney-
General, convicted in Republican style, sent to a Democratic jail, in charge
of a Democratic jailer, and ran away in true Democratic fashion.
"But, it is said, he has exposed the Canal Ring. The air has been filled
with his exploits as a reformer of the Canal Ring. Three suits have been
brought, — three law suits. One man has been convicted, another has been
acquitted, another case has been dismissed. Nobody has been punished ;
not a dollar has been recovered, and $80,000 have been spent. That is
the way the book stands so far as the records of canal reformers are con
cerned.
"Now gentlemen, it is a long record that Mr. Tilden has, and we are
going to have all summer to pursue it. His record as a reformer is a gilded
fraud ; it is a delusion, a humbug, and a cheat. [Cheers.] We have at the
THE CAMPAIGN OF 18/6. 505
head of our party a right true, honest man, the Governor of Ohio. He has
written a letter of acceptance which makes to-day one of the finest State
papers in American political literature. He will be. elected. Mr. Tilden
claims in the little Pecksniffian speech he made at Albany, saying, ' Behold
how holy am I' — he claims that he has had great experience in administra
tive reform, and there must be a reform in the Civil Service. Well, how,
Mr. Tilden, how ? We want a reform, not in salaries, we want a reform in
the men ; and, having a reform in the men, we want a reform in the
methods of their selection and appointment. Gentlemen, I put this question
squarely and fairly to you : ' Do you think that, with that embodied cor
poration at the head of our nation, and with the woods full of the Confed
erates and Democrats flying to the Capital for an office, there would be any
improvement?' What in the name of God would be the personnel of the
dvil service that would be picked out of that measly crowd. And it is out
of that crowd that Tilden would have to select. They have tried the oper
ation in their Confederate Congress, and see what an exhibition they made
of themselves. Why, Washington was absolutely alive with men who were
looking for offices, because they supposed, there being a Confederate House
of Representatives, the lost cause was won. Think of a Democratic triumph
all along the line, and what the results must be ! We have seen this Dem
ocratic crowd in 1864. The Saturday before the great National Convention
which nominated McClellan met, this city was full of them. I made a
speech over there in the park, on the same stand with Dick Oglesby and
John Farnsworth. I started to go home to Chicago Sunday morning, and
what a sight there was ! Every fellow dressed in grey ; breezes, in compar
ison with which the odors from Bridgeport were sweet as those from a bank
of flowers, came from every car. Train after train, the engines all doubled
up, and not a seat to be had on the cars. They were the Democratic
delegates on their way to the Convention. After I arrived in Chicago, a
good old Democrat said to me : 'I was very much surprised a little while
ago. I saw a great mass of men going down Wabash Avenue, and I
thought it was a procession of rebel prisoners on their way for exchange,
but I'll be damned if it wasn't the Democratic delegation from Missouri.'
"In the presence of that same savory crowd Samuel J. Tilden appeared
in 1864. Some fellows had an ear bitten off in a joint debate, men with
their noses broken in an election contest, fellows with short hair. Those
men came on with banners with doves upon them, engaged in the olive-
branch business, and all swearing for peace. At the head of this crowd in
1864 was Samuel J. Tilden. My friends, the crowd has not changed, and
the leader of the Democracy has not changed one single bit since that
time. I would not say an unkind word of my Democratic friends, — there
are many clever gentlemen among them,— but, as a political organization,
I think their party is absolutely cussed and infernal. I think there can be
nothing more suicidal than to intrust into the hands of these men, who
sought the destruction of our national life, the direction of our national
interests. I believe in this nation. I know what it is, — it is the sacred
custodian of the priceless treasure of free government for all peoples and all
5O6 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
nationalities. I hope to see it endure forever. I cherish in my very heart
of hearts the memory of the great heroes who have lived and died, the
great leaders of our great party. It may be that I may be false to every
thing else. I hope that I may never be false to it. I hope to carry in
my heart as the most sacred thing \vhich it bears an intense, indulging,
never-ending love of this great nation, embalmed, sanctified, and glori
fied as it has been by the blood of so many hundreds and thousands
of noble men; and I believe in my very soul that this nation can be
saved, and that, with all its faults and shortcomings, this Republican
party, whose cause I to-night advocate, is the real custodian of our
national honor and integrity. All hail, then, the great cause ! We stand
upon the threshold of this great contest. Let the old fires be everywhere
relighted ; let the old spirit be again rekindled, and let the word come
up from the old leaders, as in the olden time, 'Attention! forward!"1
At Detroit, the Republicans opened the campaign by the
dedication of a large central wigwam on the 24th of August.
In compliance with an invitation from the State Central Commit
tee, Mr. Storrs was present, and addressed one of the largest and
liveliest indoor meetings ever witnessed in the State of Michigan.
A Detroit paper, reporting the proceedings, said:
" His speech was an excellent one and full of witty points, but was repeat
edly interrupted and almost spoiled by the comings and goings of a lot of
ward clubs, who, at intervals of ten minutes, marched into the wigwam and
then marched out again, arrayed in oilcloth caps and capes and carrying
lamps, screeching, cheering, firing, drumming and indulging in other tom
foolery, until the speaker almost lost the thread of his argument by the fre
quency with which he had to lay it down to give way to the noisy nonsense
of these fellows. He bore it, however, with much good nature, only making
it the text of several good jokes. ' Even a first-class voice,' he said at one
time, 'has no chance with a second-class band.' At another time he inter
jected : ' I have no objection to the tune, but to its length.' At another
interruption : ' Republicans around here seem to be innumerable, and every
one of them seems to have a band of his own.' As another gang of howl
ers passed through, he was again compelled to stop, and turning to
those on the platform, he said with good-natured sarcasm, ' If they would
only march one way ! ' His speech glittered with witticisms and scathing
satire. The News has not space for a' full report, and no condensation
could be made of it which would not obliterate its most meritorious features.
It was not an argument the heads of which could be reproduced, syntheti
cally, but a spoken satire, whose best parts depended more upon the words
and manner upon than the thought conveyed.
"After a few words of introduction, he said:
"What evidence has the Democratic party given us to warrant us in re
storing it to power ? I am constantly met with the beseeching question,
•For God's sake, can't you let bygones be bygones?' and I invariably
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1876. 5O/
reply that I will cease to talk about the glories of the Republican party
when you cease to be Democrats. When will the mission of the Repub
lican party be ended ? Never, while there is on the face of the earth an
unreconciled and unreconstructed Democrat. They have learned during the
past six years that the poorest way of reforming the Republican party is to
vote the Democratic ticket, and I am glad to see that many of them
are being converted. Welcome back, my friends, and sit by the Repub
lican fire, but please don't do so any more. The Democrats entreat us to
let by-gones be by-gones, and the first moment we speak of the issues
of the war they accuse us of waving the bloody shirt. If our record
was an infamous as theirs, . we would be as ashamed as they are, and
would wish to keep still about it. Every page of the record of the
Democratic party is written in blood, repudiation and attacks on the
national credit. We must judge of the party as we would judge of an
individual, forecast the future by the past. Judging the Republican party
by this standard what you can say of it? Sixteen years ago it had
crystallized about itself the best men of the nation, and when the rebel
lion broke out, this great party came to the rescue and saved the
nation. This young political organization did not cease its good work
then. It freed 4,000,000 people who were slaves and made them men,
elevating them to the rights of citizenship. It has taken the old ship of
state and torn from it the decaying timbers and replaced them with
granite of universal freedom. It has met every issue resolutely and
honorably. It found a disturbed and impaired national credit, and it has
restored and strengthened it. It has taken this country, our country,
through its hours of trial, until to-day it is the proudest country that the
sun shines upon. Can you wonder that words, that language seem pow
erless to express its glories. It will grow brighter and brighter as the
long years recede.
"We are asked to-night to surrender this party, and to whom? You are
asked to barter all its glories away — to say that, having achieved this much,
we give it up, and to whom? To that party which all through the war
resisted its prosecution, the party that after the war said, 'You shall sur
render every idea that you have advanced and confirmed ; ' the party that
said, 'Repudiate the public debt;' the party that declared the constitu
tional amendments void; the party that believed and still do believe that
what was lost in the field can be achieved in a confederate house of repre
sentatives. Now I claim that when a party transfers the issues of the day
from the halls of congress to the arbitrament of arms, and is defeated,
there must be a surrender, not only of arms, but of the ideas that were
fought for. Unless the surrender of Lee included the surrender of every
Democratic principle that brought on the war, Tilden was correct in 1864
when he said that the war was a failure.
"Gentlemen, these issues do not die away as soon as our Democratic
friends would have you believe. If the national credit is in danger, from
whence does it' come ? Does it come from the Republican party ? Every
Republican who hears my voice will answer ' no ! ' Now, has the Demo-
508 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
cratic party changed? Yes, it has somewhat, for the Republican party is a
missionary, and evangelizer. At the close of the war it liberated 4,000,000
negroes, and God knows how many Democrats, the only difference being
that the negroes had the good sense to avail themselves of their freedom,
while the Democrats did not do it. The Democrats, at the St. Louis con
vention, declared that they were opposed to stealing. Was there ever a
missionary enterprise attended with better success? Why it seems that
they actually believe now in one of the commandments, and with your
help I propose to ram the whole ten down their throats before this cam
paign is over.
"The Democrats have held a national convention. They always do,
by the way, once in four years, and I propose to read from Mr. Til-
den's essay, called the platform of the Democratic party. It begins by
saying that 'We, the Democratic party, declare that reform is demanded.'
Listen to that 'We the Democratic party,' who, after dieting on east
wind for sixteen years, now declare in favor of reform. They also say
something about the permanency of the federal Union. These Democrats
engaged for four years in a steady effort to destroy the Union, and for
twelve years in an effort to prevent the efficiency of the constitutional
amendments, declare that they ' hereby reaffirm their belief in the perma
nency of the federal Union. Reaffirm it! When did they ever affirm
it? That same party in 1864 declared, through Samuel J. Tilden, that
the war had been a failure, and in 1868 sought the destruction of the
national credit by an infamous proposition to pay the national debt in
greenbacks. This platform also denounces the financial imbecility and
immorality of the Republican party. Think of the Democratic party
denouncing the immorality of anybody or anything. There are two things
to be said about this plank ; first, it is impudent, and second, it is false.
The Republican party has reduced the public debt hundreds and hundreds
of millions of dollars, and yet the Democratic delegates at St. Louis
denounce the party because they have taken no steps towards resumption.
Eleven years ago, gold, our standard of value, was quoted at #160.
To-day it is quoted at #1.10. Thus, without disturbing the currents of trade,
gold has been reduced to a point where resumption is not far distant. The
Democrats denounce the failure of the Republican party for 1 1 years to make
good the legal tender notes. I have already shown you that the Republican
party has stood unflinchingly by the national credit, and the day is not far
distant when we shall wake up some fine morning and find that gold
is at #i, greenbacks at $i, and that specie payment has resumed itself.
This, gentlemen, can never be done by turning over the government to
the Democratic party. It can only be done by steadily pursuing the
course of the past.
"Here are the Democratic delegates from all parts of the country repre
senting the lost cause, denouncing a period of crimes and abuses which the
Democratic party propose to right. These sixteen years embraced four
years of war, four years of the administration of Lincoln and eight years
of the administration of General Grant. Sanctified by the blood of a quarter
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1876.
of a million of brave men, these years are denounced by such men as
Ben Hill, Lamar and others. If there is a particle of the old spirit in
Detroit I know that you will consider this an insult. Tilden's letter of
acceptance and the St. Louis platform are full of accusations of the Repub
lican party and are much alike in this respect ; they are shocked at its thefts
and immorality, and promise peace and good times. If the government
was turned over to the Democratic party it would be indeed the time when
the lion and the lamb shall lie down together, with the very small dif
ference that the lamb would be on the inside. I do not propose to
defend the Republican party. Wherever stealing has been done it has been
done by individuals, irrespective of the principles of the Republican party,
and those individuals are the ones to blame. The Democratic party is a
robber as an organization, and I say to you that the stealing and corruption in
the Republican party are too small to be noticed when compared with a
party that would steal arms, steal states, and that finally attempted to steal
the whole nation. Precisely how the Democratic party propose to carry
out the reforms about which they talk so much they do not tell us.
"I hear something said about centralization, and I wish to say that if
it is a bad thing I am opposed to it. On the other hand, if it is a
good thing I am in favor of it, and if it is neither good nor bad I
don't care much about it. If they mean by centralization such an
administration of the law as shall secure freedom and protection to all,
I am in favor of it. I should consider a party beneath contempt that
would give a man his freedom and refuse to give him the right to pro
tect that freedom by withholding the ballot. I say again, that if that
is centralization I am in favor of it, and I would protect the colored
men in such rights. These constitutional amendments are absolutely
inoperative of themselves. They simply declare the freedom of the negro,
but it takes something more than that. These amendments need legisla
tion to give them force, and the Republican party has supplied this, so
that it is to this party that the colored men of the south are indebted
for the privileges they enjoy to-day. With a Democratic congress and a
Democratic president I ask you how long these statutes would stand upon
the statute-books? They would disappear like the snow before the
morning sun, and all the rights we have secured to the negroes would
be undone. Are you tired of what you have done? Would you take
back the rights given to them? Would you say to them you are free,
but you cannot vote? or would you say to them you can vote, but if
your former masters attempt to intimidate you and keep you from the
ballot-box we will stand idly by and shake hands with them over the
bloody chasm ?
"The Democrats propose to reform the civil service, but how? Tilden
says by selecting a higher grade of men ; but from where ? Where will you
find them? The offices must be filled by either Democrats or Republicans.
If you want loyal men, men of refinement, men of culture, the Republican
party is full of them. At Washington this winter we have seen the kind of
men that the Democrats propose to reform the civil service with, the emis-
5IO LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
saries of the lost cause. Culture? Men who can't tell whether the Saviour
of mankind was crucified at Calvary or shot at Bunker Hill. Why the
roads through the country are full of tramps, Democratic office-seekers,
hoofing it from Washington. Another instance, what a great moral city is
the city of New York. How piously the Democrats there can stuff a ballot
box, and count this man in or that man out. How very quietly they go
about doing good — so quietly that no one ever hears of it.
"Who is the Democratic candidate? Samuel J. Tilden. Some people
say that they shall vote for him because they are tired of machine poli
tics. Why, gentlemen, Samuel J. Tilden is the perfection of a machine.
He is a reaper and mower combined, a self-sharpener, and has never
been anything else. They tell us that Mr. Tilden is a patriotic man, but
how very quietly he went about saving the union, his left hand on the
Chicago convention, and his right hand didn't know anything about it.
Here was a war where millions of men met on the field of battle, where
hundreds of thousands of lives were lost, where an immense amount of
treasure was expended, and I ask you, was there a man about whose
position there could be a particle of doubt? Why, every school boy in
the land was able to define his position in regard to the war, but skulk
ing behind his law books and railroad bonds Samuel J. Tilden was not
heard from. We all have the right to say to him, You were no obscure
country lawyer, why could you not at once say, ' God speed to the good
cause. God speed to the noble soldiers.' How different was the posi
tion of our candidate. There's his record, (pointing to the ' scalping' let
ter printed on a banner.) Recognizing the claim on him he went to the
front. There's no doubt where he was. But Tilden did not utter one little
word about the war. Riding on a pass of one of the numerous rail
roads he had consolidated, he arrived in the city of Chicago, and the
dapper little gentleman was carefully folded in a piece of tissue paper and
wafted to the Democratic convention. I wonder if, when Tilden retires at
night to his lonely bachelor's bed, he doesn't wish a mountain would fall on
him and crush him before morning, or that some great gulf would open and
swallow up the peace plank in the Chicago platform. They tell us that
Tilden wasn't responsible for it, and according to the Democrats, lions and
tigers wouldn't be anywhere in the way of this little dapper governor of
New York. Why didn't he rise up and protest against this plank in the
Chicago convention? He did worse in that convention of Greenbackers for
greenbacks. Tilden got up and said, We, of the committee on resolutions,
are all agreed. Another peace member got up and said we are all agreed.
Morrissey was there for peace, and in fact they were all engaged in the
olive branch business. All the record you can find of this valiant man,
Samuel J. Tilden, who was crazy to go to the war as a private, is this
peace plank.
•'They say he is a reformer, and that he unearthed the frauds of
Tweed. Tilden and Tweed were personal friends for many years, and
long after all Tweed's villainies had been exposed by the Republican press,
Tilden met him in convention and took him up as a political equal and
THE CAMPAIGN OF 18/6. 511
friend. After the Republican party and the Republican press had exposed
Tweed, Tilden came to the front and rolled into office as Governor of
New York on the tide that swamped Tweed. Now, Tweed was tried
before a Republican Judge, by a Republican prosecuting attorney, and
convicted by a Republican jury, but he escaped from a Democratic
sheriff. It is truly wonderful to mark the progress of reform. Confined in
a small room not much larger than this, poorly furnished with marble-
top tables and tapestried throughout, eating but five or six meals per day,
and seeing only fifty or sixty visitors each day, Tweed pined for a sight
of his wife ; he never loved her so much in his life before. The jailor
took him in a carriage to his humble dwelling in that pauper street,
Fifth Avenue, and he went in at the front door. From that moment
to the present time the places that knew him know him no more forever.
"Tilden is reform governor of New York; he has broken the canal
ring. Eighty thousand dollars has been expended, three men indicted,
one of whom was convicted and is now imprisoned out of doors on bail.
This is the great ring-smasher. Now I suppose you all know that if
there is anything that will make a man love his fellow men all through
and through, it is to consolidate railroads. That is where Samuel J.
Tilden has proved himself a success. He is the great railroad physician,
and whenever he has stood at the bedside of a railroad there has been
a railroad funeral in that immediate neighborhood very soon thereafter.
Generally, you know, a physician's success depends upon his ability to
save his patients, and it seems strange that when railroads have died
on his hands Tilden has achieved great success. He is the author of
watered stock and the finisher of blighted railroad stock. There is hardly
a farmer in this broad land but that has a little piece of paper stowed
away somewhere that he occasionally takes out, and, as he looks at it
and mourns its worthlessness, he can trace it to the great reform candi
date, Samuel J. Tilden."
The same newspaper, editorially, said — "The meeting at the
Central Wigwam on Michigan avenue was a splendid one in
numbers and in spirit. The speech of Hon. Emery A. Storrs
kept the attention of the audience from first to last. It was
among the most admirable efforts of its kind to which we have
ever listened. Keen in its irony, scathing in its sarcasm, power
ful in its arraignment of the Democracy and their leaders,
eloquent and convincing in its tribute to the services of the
Republican party, it carried every hearer with it. The Republi
cans are to be congratulated upon the auspicious manner in
which the campaign has been opened."
On his return home, Mr. Storrs accepted an invitation to
address the Republicans of Freeport, and fulfilled his engagement
on the 1 5th of September. The <announcement that he was to
512 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
speak, and the meeting of the Congressional Convention in the
afternoon, had filled the town with people, and the large hall
which had been secured for the meeting could not hold the
crowds, Republican and Democrat, who thronged to hear him.
He said:
"I by no means feel in addressing the magnificent audience hereto-night
assembled that I am among strangers, or that I am speaking to stran
gers. I have known Freeport, its people, its surroundings, its patriotic
spirit, its loyal impulses, for the last sixteen years. I am somewhat renew
ing to-night an acquaintance commenced sixteen years ago, and I am
renewing that acquaintance on an occasion very much like that under
which we met when the acquaintance began. It is curious to me, and,
perhaps, may be so to you, to see how long a time it takes to wipe out
old political issues, and to substitute in their place entirely new ones. We
have all waited, watched, and hoped for the day to come when bygones
should be really bygones, — when the past with all its dreadful memories
could be erased, — when all the troubles which we had overcome \vould
be behind us as a bad dream; when, with new issues, new parties, new
organizations, this great nation, starting afresh upon its career, might
say to itself that, whatever else may happen, the past is safe, and to
the future alone are we called to look. That time, every heart that beats
before me to-night tells me has not yet arrived. Bygones are not bygones.
The past is not altogether past. The past is not quite secure. We do
not stand to-day a nation with that past absolutely safe, with the broad
future before us absolutely untrammeled by any history which lies behind
us. We confront to-day — and it is one of the wonders of this century —
the same great political organization, consisting of the same membership,
inspired by the same feelings, devoted to the same purposes, holding pre
cisely the same ideas, that that party held sixteen years ago when it organ
ized treason and sought the destruction of the national existence that we
met and defeated in 1860. We had hoped — and you all had hoped —
that, long before the centennial year had arrived, this Democratic party,
from which the cause of human freedom and of good government every
where had suffered so much, would have utterly passed out of existence,
and would have vexed us no more. You had hoped, my good friends, that
all those old political ideas on which that party was based, and to maintain
and enforce which it organized a gigantic rebellion, would have been buried
in oblivion and absolutely be regarded among the things of the past. But,
as eagerly as you might have hoped this, you are doomed to disappoint
ment. In the year of grace 1*876 this same organization, whose record is a
record of broken promises and violated pledges, — this same political organ
ization, which has carried within itself all the most dangerous political
heresies that have threatened the destruction of our national life, — is proud,
asserting, dominant, demanding that the custody of the affairs of the nation,
whose destruction it sought, shall be by a loyal people turned over to its
keeping. And the solemn question which you are to answer to-night, — the
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 8/6. $13
solemn question which, men and women alike, you are from this day forth
to put to yourselves without ceasing, is this: Shall those who would have
murdered this nation, the grandest on the face of the earth, within eleven short
years after their attempt had failed — shall they be called back into power,
and intrusted with the life and integrity of that nation, whose destruction
they sought? [A voice, "Never," and applause.] This is the question which
is constantly recurring. I am told that these are bygones, and that we are
making the same old speeches that we made in the years that are past.
This question of loyalty, of devotion to the national existence, is as old as
virtue, and the vices of the Democratic party are as old as sin. [Laughter
and applause.] As well might you ask a preacher to hush his voice and
let the pulpit go untenanted because preachers before him have denounced
sin, as to ask Republicans to hush their voices and close their meetings as
long as a Democrat lives above ground. [Applause.] We are assured,
however, that the Democratic party has changed ; that the war is past ;
that we should have a period of silence ; that the bitterness of the war
should be buried ; that a feeling of universal gushing sentimental brother
hood should prevail ; that we should at once proceed to shake hands across
the 'bloody chasm'; that we should forget all the sacrifices and glories of
the past, and that we should call to our bosom with a sort of paroxysmal
enthusiasm, which no blushing maiden ever yet excelled, the organizers of
treason and the unconverted enemies of the free spirit and tendencies of
modern times.
" I am in favor of conciliation — thoroughly and altogether in favor of
conciliation. The simple question in my mind is who shall be conciliated?
I turn to the old Republicans on this platform ; I turn to the old
Republicans in the body of the hall ; I ask them if they remember the
days when we started out in our procession twenty-two years ago ; I
ask them if they remember how small a procession it was; that we went
afoot ; that the going was bad ; that our feet were sore ; that the winds blew
through every hole in our garments; that the skies were inclement, and
that there were conservative gentlemen standing on the side-walks heaving
mud at the procession as it passed? [Laughter.] I ask them if they remem
ber the days when the old procession grew, when it came up a great party,
when it crystalized about itself all the holiest objects, the loftiest impulses,
the best purposes of the country, and called itself the Republican party ? I
ask them if they remember when that great procession swelled in volume
so that it embraced the whole continent, when it met a rebellion in arms,
when it throttled the life out of it, when it saved the great Nation? I
ask them if they remember when these loyal people buried their loyal
sons in every valley and on every hill-side in the land? I ask them if
they remember the thousands and millions of dollars and the countless
thousands of lives sacrificed that this nation might live? I ask them,
finally, if they remember, when peace came, and when, to protect the
national credit, another war quite as great in its proportions as the first
to vindicate and maintain the national credit has been fought and
won against the same adversaries; and I ask them to-day if, when the
33
514 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
victory is finally achieved, we may not be permitted to sit down by the
hearth-stones which we have saved, and ask that the robbers and plunderers
of the national honor shall conciliate us? [Laughter.] Wouldn't it be well
that there should be a Confederate deputation coming up from the rice-fields
of South Carolina ; wouldn't it be well if a delegation of Confederate Dem
ocrats should come here from Hamburg, — come here to this beautiful Town
of Freeport, — bearing the olive-branch in their hands, and say to the good
old loyal citizens of loyal old Stephenson, 'We have come here to conciliate
you?' No; the gushing little candidate running for President to-day, and
all his forces, Tray, Blanche, and Sweetheart, say that the broad-browed,
big-hearted men of Stephenson must go down to Hamburg and conciliate
Butler, and his murderous associates.
"I speak of the Democratic party. It comes to you to-day asking that
the confidence which you withdrew from it twenty years ago nearly shall
be again restored to it. What has it done? Twenty years ago this same
Democratic party made human sympathy a curse, and made charity an
indictable offense. Twenty years ago this same Democratic party, which
to-day demands the suffrages of the people, organized itself into a party
which said the sunshine of freedom shall be local, and the black shadow of
slavery shall be national. This same party organized secession in the war,
and, having failed in meeting reason by the bullet and argument by the
bludgeon, took its political principles to the last field to which those ques
tions are ever referred. It carried them into battle; its banners went down
in defeat; its hopes were crushed; its arms were defeated; and I said, and
you said, as we stood upon the edge of that mighty conflict, — its roar still
ringing in our ears, and its smoke still filling the sky — 'Surrender' — not
only the men who fought, and the guns with which they fought, but ' Sur
render every single political idea for which you fought.' If, when Lee's
armies surrendered at Appomattox, they did not surrender the damnable
heresies out of which the war grew; if we did not demand that surrender,
the war was a failure as base and shameless as Tilden declared it in 1864.
I supposed, we all supposed, that, when their armies were annihilated,
their political ideas were annihilated as well. Has there been any conver
sion? Point me to a single Democrat south of Mason and Dixon's line, big
or little, who to-day will tell you that he entertains on the question of State
Sovereignty an opinion in the slightest degree different from that which he
held when the war began. Point me to a single leading Democrat North,
prominent in politics, who was a Democrat when the war began who to-day
will tell you that he believes on the question of State Sovereignty one iota
differently from what he did sixteen years ago. Is it possible, then, that a
party made up of the same members, each individual member holdmg the
same belief that he held twenty years ago, — that the party has changed
when there has been no change in the opinions of its individual members?
"In 1861, Samuel J. Tilden, with James Buchanan, declared as his opin
ion that, although a State had no right to secede, the General Government
had no right to coerce it into the Union. Has Tilden changed? Is there a
Democrat in the whole length and breadth of the land that has changed?
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 8/6. 51$
Not one. If no individual member has changed, how, then, has the party
changed ? If they have changed, if they have revolutionized that belief, if
they are now honestly of the opinion that this nation is one and indivisible;
that the right of secession does not exist; that there is inherent in the Gen
eral Government the power to crush out the attempt whenever it is made ;
if, to follow this out, there is a single Democrat who has to-day reached
those conclusions, there is but one way in which the genuineness of his
change of conviction can be demonstrated, and that is by leaving the
Democratic party and joining the ranks of Republicanism. [Applause.]
When the heathen ceases to worship his idol of block or stone as the real
God — when he believes in the divinity of the Saviour, and in, the truths of
the Old and the New Testament, he doesn't stay among the heathen, but
joins the Christian Church. And if these Democrats are converted, I have
this advice to give them : Get out from among your heathen associations,
stop worshiping your images of brick and of stone, change your soiled and
battered clothing of Democracy, wash yourselves clean, put on a new shirt,
come into the ranks of Republicanism, don its garments, and thus prove the
genuineness of the change of heart which you claim to have experienced.
[Applause and laughter.]
"This Republican party of ours comes to you to-day with substantially
the same membership. It is the same party with its unbroken record of
glory, that made four millions of chattels freemen and citizens. It found
the old structure of State filled with the rotten and decayed timbers of
African servitude. It removed them all amid the thunders of war, and
replaced them with the everlasting granite of freedom. This same Repub
lican party that crowded into four short years of war the most colossal
and resplendent results ever recorded in history, confronted at its close
a vast debt, and honestly, manfully, faithfully, it has pledged the credit
of the whole nation that it shall be paid, and reduced it more than
$400,000,000 of money. This same great party, confronting this new con
dition of things, found these former slaves freemen. It made them citi
zens. Making them citizens, it said to them and the nation and the
world, ' We will clothe them with all the weapons by which the right
of citizenship may be protected ; we will make them voters.' It made
them voters, and, making them voters, the Congress of the United States
has placed it within the power of the General Government to protect
them in the exercise and enjoyment of that right.
" It has lifted millions of dollars of tax from the shoulders of the
people. It has decreased by millions of dollars the national expenditures.
It has increased by millions of money the national revenues; and this
brings its history down to to-day.
"But while I am discussing questions of this character, some Democrats
tell me, 'Why, those are old issues.' 'The freedom of the slave,' they
say, 'is secure beyond all question. His citizenship, as you have said, is
imbedded in the Constitution.' His right to vote, they tell us, is secure.
And when they make that line of argument they seem to think that the
whole discussion is closed. Right here, my fellow-citizens, let us pause and
5l6 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
think. Let me suggest to you that there is hardly a clause in our Federal
Constitution which is self-enforcing. We have a provision that there shall
be Federal courts, and I think I see a conservative Democrat — one of the
old-time Democrats who respects the Constitution beyond all measure —
stand with his toes turned out and his back to the fire, and with his hand
under his coat-tail, saying. ' I am in favor of the Constitution — I am in
favor of that clause which provides for Federal courts, but I am not in
favor of this Congressional legislation by which the Court is created.'
I ask you, gentlemen, notwithstanding the fact that the Democrat is in
favor of the Constitution, is he in favor of the Court? We have our clauses
in that Constitution providing for mail routes and post-offices. What is a
clause in the Constitution worth unless there be some Congressional legisla
tion to put it into force? We have these Constitutional Amendments by
which citizenship and freedom are both conferred upon the negro, but they
are not self-enforcing. Each one of these amendments provides that they
shall be enforced by appropriate legislation. Now, what is that appropriate
legislation, and what is its precise value? Let me tell you, if you will
strike out all Congressional legislation upon the subject and leave the
amendments standing alone, they are as idle for all useful purposes ' as a
painted ship upon a painted ocean.' The Republican party is a practical
party. It imbedded those great rights in the Constitution. It took them
down to the solid rock upon which the nation lives, and it said. ' We will
make these no idle gifts. These shall be no treacherous benefactions. We
mean precisely what we say.' We gave freedom to the slave. It were
base not to protect him in its enjoyment. We gave citizenship to the
negro. It were base not to protect him in the enjoyment of all its privi
leges. We gave him the right to vote. It were outrageous if it were an
idle gift. We protect him in the full and complete enjoyment of the right,
and therefore Congress has by legislation provided that, whenever any
privileges thus conferred shall be interfered with, this great central power
which we call the General Government may intervene> and may protect the
negro in the enjoyment of every privilege which the Constitutional Amend
ment confers upon him. It says this : ' We give you by the Constitution
the right to citizenship and to vote, and more by legislation. This is no
ideal gift. If, when you go to deposit your ballot, that right is interfered
with, if the State in which you live cannot or will not protect you, this
great Government will protect you. If you are interfered with by force, we will
protect you by force. If armed men threaten you in the enjoyment of any of
those privileges, armed men shall march to your support, and assert your full
and complete enjoyment of them.' This is what the Democratic party call
centralization.
It is a centralization of which I am enthusiastically in favor. I would
give nothing for that Government so utterly powerless and helpless that
could not, even at the cost of war, at the extremes of the globe, protect the
meanest and poorest of its citizens when insulted and outraged. I would
spit upon that Government which would not at home protect, even at the
cost of war, the meanest and poorest of its citizens in the enjoyment of
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1876. 5 1/
every privilege which the Constitution conferred upon him. And the man
to-day who is in favor of the Constitutional Amendments, and is opposed to
that legislation by which they shall be enforced, is a coward and a sneak,
and fittingly belongs to the Democratic party.
"I will pursue this subject still further. Let me illustrate a little. I think
I am familiar with this Democratic party. I have read its history. It has
been burned into me and into you. During the war, all through the North,
you found magnificent Democrats who were in favor of a vigorous prosecution
of the war. Certainly they were. They were in favor of a vigorous prose
cution of the war, but were opposed to drafting a single man. They were
in favor of the suppression of the rebellion, but were opposed to buying a
gun. They were in favor of the suppression of treason, but opposed to
invading what they call a Sovereign State ; opposed to secession, and opposed
to putting it down ; opposed to a dissolution of the Union, and opposed to
preventing anybody dissolving it.
"One more question on this point. You have seen one-half of a Confed
erate Congress. They cannot disturb the amendments. But place the whole
of the affairs of this nation in the hands of the Democratic party, and where do
you suppose, within thirty days after attaining power, where do you suppose
every single syllable of legislation will be left that was intended to enforce
the provisions of those amendments? Away back in 1863, in the Democratic,
patriotic, honestly-governed John Morrissey-Sam Tilden-Isaiah Rynders-Bill
Tweed City of New York, there was inaugurated a little one-horse Demo
cratic rebellion. The Draft law had been enforced. Seymour, Tilden, all
good Democrats, had assured the rank and file that all that legislation was
revolutionary, unconstitutional, and void. If there ever was a man that
loved the Constitution and talked about it all the time, that carried it about
with him, and slept with it under his pillow, it is one of the meek and lowly
followers of John Morrissey and Isaiah Rynders. [Laughter.] If there ever
was a class of men up in science who denied privileges to the negros on
the ground that they were not men, and that their astragalus differed from
that of a white man, it was the learned savans whose noses have been
broken and whose ears have been bitten off in those discussions in the City
of New York. [Great laughter.] At that time these good, zealous Demo
crats really believed in the bottom of their patriotic souls that the Constitu
tion had been violated by the Draft law, and organized a mob and brought
on a great riot, in the midst of which Horatio Seymour wrote a letter to
President Abraham Lincoln. He said to him practically: 'We are all in
favor of the prosecution of the war. We all devoutly pray that the LTnion
may be saved. We pray every night when we retire to our couches that the
Union may be restored. But this Draft law opposes and violates, as we
think, some of the fundamental provisions of the Constitution. The temper
of the loyal people of this State,' he said, 'is greatly aroused,' and there
fore he proposed to Abraham Lincoln that the draft be suspended, and that
a lawsuit be commenced in some court in the City of New York and car
ried through to the Supreme Court of the United States, which, in the
course of two or three years, might be terminated, and by which it might
5l8 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
be ascertained whether the draft was all right or not. [Laughter.] Mr.
Lincoln wrote back to him: 'My dear sir: I cannot see how your proposi
tion will work. The difficulty is our Confederate friends south of Mason
and Dixon's line won't wait for your lawsuit. They go right along and fill
up their armies.' And he says, 'My dear Seymour, go on with your law
suit, one or two, or as many of them as you please. I will go along with
my draft, and we will run them in parallel lines;' and, as it turned out, the
other Democratic rebellion south of Mason and Dixon's line was crushed
into powder long before Horatio Seymour's suits would have been reached
upon the docket. [Applause and laughter.] It is the same party precisely
that acted thus when such dangers as those were threatening us which now
asks that the affairs of this nation shall be turned over to its keeping. It is
the same party, reeking all through with its political crimes, that insists upon
it that from the hands of this great loyal organization that saved the nation,
it shall be taken, and passed over into the keeping of that great disloyal
mob who sought its destruction. I do not believe that the time has yet
arrived when this loyal people have so far forgotten the history of the past
twenty years that they are prepared to accede to this request.
"It occurs to me that here is a proper place to be scriptural. I have
watched, as I have told you, this Democratic party curiously — watched its
promises. It is a party absolutely without performance, and depends
altogether upon promise. If there is a banker in this town, or a citizen
who is not a banker, that has loaned some fellow $100 which the fellow has
never paid, he may forgive the debt — let that be a bygone ; but I don't
believe he will make another loan. [Laughter.] How may I know that
this Democratic party is to keep its promises? By judging from what it has
done? Oh, no. They say, 'We will save the nation.' We saved it. We
have saved you that trouble. They say, 'We will protect it.' Why, you
sought to destroy it. They say, 'We will maintain the national credit.'
Why, you sought to ruin it. They say, 'We will make greenbacks equal
to gold.' We say, 'You sought to destroy them altogether.' They say,
' We will lift up the national credit to where it belongs, and pay the national
debt.' We say, ' It was eight years ago that you sought to repudiate it.1
These are the promises it is making to-day. These are the performances
of the past. How are you going to judge from promises? Suppose there
comes into your place of business a young man magnificently adorned with
a platform. He shines and glistens all over with it. He has brought, per
haps, the Ten Commandments, the Sermon on the Mount, the Saint's Rest,
and Taylor's Holy Living, all rolled into one: and he says, 'I would like
to be treasurer of your insurance company ;' and you produce to him a
record from the Police Court simply showing that he has been indicted and
convicted twice of larceny, what on earth becomes of his platform ? [Laugh
ter.] And when this Democratic party comes to you with its platform,
' We, the delegates of the Democratic party in National Convention assem
bled in the City of St. Louis, insist upon it that the country demands imme
diate reform,' you say, 'All right; but, in case anybody should doubt you,
I propose to take a hand in. [Laughter.] Try it on yourselves first.' I saw
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 8/6.
an announcement some days ago of a meeting of a 'Tilden Reform Club,'
I asked them which they intended to reform, Tilden or the Club. [Laughter.]
Now, then, as to the scripture. A noted ex-Senator is on the stump
again, and he is always scriptural. A good man, but his heart is running
over with this milky kind of goodness that would arrest a thief, capture the
spoons from him, and then give him your hat and overcoat that there
should be no misunderstanding nor unkind feeling in the future. [Great
laughter.] He says that we should treai our brethren of the South with
the same Christian spirit that the father in the parable treated the Prodigal
Son. I have read the parable of the Prodigal Son. I am willing to accept
that test; and I, for one, would be willing to treat the Southern prodigal
precisely as the old man in the story treated his prodigal. The prodigal
of the parable was a pretty good sort of boy, as the world went. He came
to man's estate. He left home when he had a perfect right to leave.
Nobody questioned it. No soul doubted it. His portion was paid over
to him. He didn't take a single dollar that did not belong to him. If I
have read history aright, that was not precisely the course which the South
ern Prodigal pursued. [Laughter.] The old scripture Prodigal was a boy
standing just upon the threshold of life, foolish as hundreds and thousands
of boys have been since, with his pocket full of rocks. He went out to see
the world, fell among the Democrats, and naturally enough was cleaned
out. [Laughter.] He did not seek the destruction of the old homestead
when he left it. He went away with no ill-will. He did not attempt to
plunder either the old man or the brother he left behind him. But he found
that playing prodigal didn't pay. When his money was gone, and his
credit was gone, and his Democratic friends had no further use for him, he
went to feeding swine, and then went to feeding with swine. He got about
as low down as he could, and, sore, sick, disheartened, covered with blis
ters and scars, the poor, foolish boy, loaded down with his unhappy exper
ience, but with his heart still in the right place, got up from among the
hogs where he was groveling and says, ' I will go back to my father,' and
back he went. And, as he was tottering on the way, the old man was
looking over the gate watching down the long and dusty highway for the
poor boy to return, as he knew he would ; and he saw him coming hob
bling along, ragged, and wretched, and miserable ; but he was his boy still,
and he went out and threw his arms around him and bade him welcome
and gave him a suit of clothes and a ring and a veal dinner, and that was
all. [Laughter.] Now that is all that boy got. I want you to observe he didn't
come back headed by a band-wagon and a banner with 'Tilden and Reform' on
it. What did he ask for ? He did not come back after the fashion of these
large-headed gentlemen from the South, saying. 'I will run this farm.'
No sir. He came back saying, ' Father, I haven't a cent ; take me as a
hired servant'; and, so far as I have been able to discover, — if there are
any preachers here they will correct me, — he did kitchen work forever
after. And yet the loyal stay-at-home boy .was not quite satisfied with that
arrangement. He looked at that calf when about immolating him in con
gratulation for the return of the boy, and he said to the old man : ' Father,
52O LIFE OF EMERY A. STORRS.
I never went off to be a prodigal. I never spent my money and substance
in riotous living, and you never killed any fatted calf for me.' And the
loyal, patriotic father turned around to him and said : 'Son, thou art
always with me. All that I have is thine. Not a dollar in money, not a
foot of land, not an office, not a smell of an office, goes to this returning
prodigal.' [Cheers and uproarious laughter.] But this loyal, patriotic
Northern ex-Senator says that we should let the Southern prodigals take
this Government — this farm — and .run it for all time in the future. Now
suppose we do offer the Southern prodigals this nation. Suppose they do
come back kindly. They say they accept the situation. It is remarkable;
is it not a little extraordinary, after the surrender at Appomattox, that they
accept the situation? Isn't it a little extraordinary that the Rebel army
accepted the situation at Vicksburg ? Isn't it quite strange and startling,
and doesn't it make the world come out in violent gushing kindness, to think
that Bragg's army accepted the situation at Chattanooga? Isn't it curious
that the Confederate army accepted the situation at Five Forks? Isn't it
strange that Floyd and the rest of them accepted the situation at Donelson? Ah,
of course they did. There was nothing else under God's heavens that they
could do. [Applause.] They did accept the situation, and that is all there
is about it, — not only when their armies were beaten in the field, when the
last ditch was reached, when their banners were trailing in the mud and
mire of everlasting and eternal defeat, with their arms stricken from their
hands, with their cause hopelessly lost. This was done after the nation
had been filled with mourning, and the Northern people burdened with a
debt of three thousand millions of dollars ; after the little hero to-day at the
head of the Government had Rebellion by the throat and choked the life
out of it. Then the courteous Rebels accepted the situation.
" It is this same party which to-day demands the custody of the national
finances, and at the head of their ticket they have a great financial
reformer, and stumping in various sections of the country are Democratic
orators, eager and earnest, introducing their arguments to the people in order
to convince them that a sound currency, a restored credit, must be the neces
sary result of a Democratic Administration. Somewhere in the State of Indi
ana is a distinguished Senator denouncing the Republican party in that it
fixed a day for the resumption of specie-payments. He says if that policy
is carried out there will be such a contraction of the greenback that it will
be quadrupled in its value, and that, therefore, every debt which every citi
zen owes will be practicaly quadrupled in amount. Isn't it a terrible cal
amity to think of? Let us stop and consider it. Has it ever occurred to
you whether it is very probable that any time within our prospects of living
a greenback will be worth very much more than gold ? Suppose some enter
prising citizen of Jo Daviess County concludes he will start a dairy. He gets his
cows, and his machinery for running the business. He issues his milk tickets,
and he finds by and by, so many tickets has he issued, that he has a great
many more tickets than milk. What is he going to do ? Can he contract
his tickets so as to resume? Suppose he began contracting, — that he calls
in his tickets, — the time will never come when the milk ticket will be worth
THE CAMPAIGN OF 18/6. $21
more than the milk. What is the policy of the Republican party? If you
cannot contract your tickets,— if you cannot call them in, inflate your dairy,
—get more cows ; get no more tickets, but for God's sake get more cows.
(Laughter.) What is the policy of the Democratic party? It is to inflate
your tickets, and to inflate your milk at the same time. Instead of having a
tendency toward honest resumption of your tickets, instead of enlarging your
dairy, they have immediate recourse to the pump. When it is inflated by
that process, have they got any more milk? [Laughter.] I am asked by
Democratic orators, 'Do you pretend to claim that Congress cannot make
money : that the inscription which it puts upon a piece of paper doesn't con
fer upon it actual value? Do you/ they say, 'deny the power of Congress
to do that ? ' Yes. I have the utmost reverence for the power of Congress,
but there are many things that Congress cannot do. Congress cannot make
a horse. Congress cannot make two hundred acres out of one. Congress cannot
make actual value by saying that it is actual value. Take a £20 gold piece
fresh from the mint, with the inscription clear and bright upon it. Obliter
ate every letter and every figure ; leave it an absolutely smooth surface ;
twist it into any shape you please ; make a round ball of it, and it is then
worth $20. Take a $20 greenback. Obliterate the inscription from it;
make it a blank piece of paper; roll it up in a wad, and it isn't worth a —
Democratic curse. [Laughter.] It is absolutely good for nothing. There is
no inherent value in it ; and the only worth it possesses is the belief of the
holder of the paper in two things ; First, in the ability of the nation to
make the promise good ; and second, in the willingness of the nation to
make the promise good. You cannot enforce a liability against a nation by
an attachment proceeding. It is to a certain extent idle to say that every
blade of grass and grain of wheat is pledged to the payment of the green
back and of the bonds. So long as the Republican party is in power, that is
true ; but with the Democratic party in power it is false. The credit of
either the greenback or the bond depends upon the integrity of the party in
power, and the just management of national affairs. Place to-day — if the
Almighty in His wrath should see fit to do it — this Democratic party at the
head and in custody of our national interests, with its long black record of
repudiation behind it, and where, so far as the national credit is concerned,
would the national credit be? Let them come up from the South, from
every Confederate cross-road, a bearer of a Confederate heart full of the
belief that the lost cause is won ; let the Government be made up in that way,
and where would our national credit be ? Do you gather grapes from thorns,
and figs from thistles? Is this Democratic party characterized to-day by
being a solid South-is that party, which for years and years has waged relentless
war against the national life, to be trusted with its old doctrine still fresh upon its
lips, and its old bitterness still lingering in its heart ? It is to be intrusted
with the care and protection of the national credit ? Let the wires carry the
intelligence abroad that the old Rebel Democratic party has triumphed, that
it has charge of the national debt, that it has charge of the national credit,
knowing that that party has always sought and desired the ruin of both,
where would our national credit be? Where would be the pledge of your
522 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
blades of grass, your gold and your silver in your mines, your coal in your
coal-field, your grain on your prairies — where would the pledge of them be
with the Democratic party in power ?
"There is nothing in this world more sensitive than national credit to the
slightest outside interference. Place in charge of it a party punctured all
through with the name of repudiation, and this national credit which we all
hold so dearly to our heart would perish in a night. I am told that we
cannot interfere with the national debt. I may overstate it. I am assured,
however, that in the last session of this Confederate Congress more than
1,000 bills for private claims from the South were presented, and smuggled in
by that most astute Northern Democratic gentleman having charge of those
affairs in Committee. Imagine the condition of those claims if they should
triumph ! Cords and cords, scores and scores, of claims of that character
would come into Congress, and millions, countless millions, of additional
indebtedness be saddled upon the people, which would render the time of
resumption of specie-payments not only an indefinite postponement, but an
everlasting impossibility.
" But they assure us they desire to reform the Civil Service. How?
Have you ever heard a Democrat say how ? Have you ever read a
Democratic speech that told you how? Has there ever stood up in Wash
ington, in the Senate or in the House, a single Democratic legislator, and
made one single recommendation of a practical character looking to the
reform of the Civil Service? Wade through their long-winded platform, if
you please. Balance each dreary platitude with the utmost care ; search it
all with the keenest analysis and criticism, and then tell me if you can. Can
you see a practicable remedy suggested by the Democratic party for the
reform of the Civil Service? My good friends, without reference to plat
forms, without reference to letters of acceptance, let us take this business as
it is. We all know that, as long as this form of Government continues, the
nation must be managed by parties. I believe in political organization. I
believe that men are so constituted that upon great political questions they
do not all think alike ; and I think two pretty evenly-balanced parties, eager
and zealous, are the most healthy indications that you can find in any free
Government. I believe, moreover, and you believe it, that the party in
power will fill the Government offices to a great extent with men holding
the same political belief that the party entertains. This is a necessity. You
will never reach that beatific condition of government when it will be other
wise. Suppose that the only issue were hard or soft money ; a large majority
of the people vote that they will have hard money, and they elect a Presi
dent upon that basis, what would you say to him if, continuing upon that
basis, representing that idea, he placed at the head of the Treasury, as its
Secretary, a man who believed in inflation? I have this to say: If I were
a hard-money Secretary of the Treasury, and believed in it as thoroughly
as I believe in it to-day, I would see to it that my first assistant, my second
assistant, my third assistant, my chief clerk, and my subordinates, if I could
command it, should be hard-money men too. I should see to it that they
talked, when they talked anything, hard money ; that they talked hard
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1876. 523
money out of the office; that they would be hard money all the way
through. When I desired to advance hard-money ideas I wouldn't go to
the soft-money men to help me. Suppose you undertake to reform the
civil service. Let me say to you here that out of one or two of these
great aggregations which we call the Democratic and the Republican parties
must these offices be filled— either by Republicans or by Democrats. From
which aggregation will you fill them? If you desire men who can write,
where will you find the most men who can read and who can write? In
the Republican party, or in the ranks of the Democracy? If you want to
find the great mass of the intelligent, honest, patriotic thought of the country,
where will you go? The question is answered by your own hearts the
instant it is asked. You know that within the boundaries of this Republican
party of the nation, within its great temple, on the walls of which are
inscribed the grandest records either of ancient or modern history, — that in
that temple are to-day assembled, and have been gathered for a quarter of
a century past, the wisest, and purest, and best, and the most patriotic men
on the continent.
" I ask you one other question. From either one of these two aggregations
must your choice be made. Imagine such a thing as a Democratic success.
I do not care how well-intentioned Mr. Tilden may be; I do not care
how resolute he may be; that man doesn't live sufficiently strong to
encounter a solid party against him. There would come floating down
upon him like the resistless waves of old ocean a tide that would sweep
that little bachelor clean up into the clouds if he didn't obey; that
would demand for these Confederate Democrats who have for sixteen
years been dieting on east wind, a reward for their services. Think of the
City of Washington. Think of the congregations that would be there assem
bled. Think of the thousands, and tens of thousands of the helpless,
hopeless, hatless, shirtless, and lost Confederates there appealing for an
office and in search of a reform of Civil Service. [Laughter.-] Is that your
remedy ? Straws show which way the wind blows. We vainly thought tha
the old Union cause had triumphed. We saw the old flag floating above
our heads, and supposed that the cause which it represented had triumphed.
We thought we had triumphed, but in an idle hour, in an evil hour, our
outposts were unguarded and the Rebel host rushed in, and when they
came in they threw their pickets out. The old skirmishers of the Union
Army, the old Boys in Blue, who had watched the doors and attended
to the messages of Congress, have surrendered, — surrendered to the foe
who but eleven years ago surrendered to them. In went again the old
conquered Confederate soldier. Out went the victorious soldier of the Union.
Soldier after soldier who had fought that the Union might live was driven from
his place. Soldier after soldier, with the old plantation threat on his lips,
who had fought that the Union might be destroyed, was put back in his
place of triumph. Doesn't it seem as if Samuel J. Tilden, in 1864, spoke
the words of prophesy when he said the war was a failure?
"Point me to a city under Democratic rule where the treasury has not
been robbed. Point me to a city under Democratic government where the
524 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
revenues have not been plundered. Point me to a little patch of land,
I do not care care how small it is, that has been under Democratic
management for years, and I will show you withered fields and blasted political
crops. Point me to any place where their policy has had its full swing, and
I will show you poor schools, bootless men, shoeless children, and ruined
wives.
"They tell us that we have forced upon the nation an ignorant vote, that
the black man is ignorant. But the black man knows he is ignorant. He
has learned that much. We erect school-houses; the Rebels tear them
down. We send teachers; they slaughter them. And yet, with the blood
of the innocent citizen upon their hands, and with the smoke of burning
asylums and school-houses on their garments, they turn around to this
great loyal North, and spit upon their history for the last twenty years, and ask
that they may be permitted to take charge of our national affairs. More
than all that. Not only have they embodied assassination in their creed,
but they have, by a reign of terror which is a disgrace to modern civiliza
tion and would be a discredit to a Turk, driven every white man from their
midst. Farmers of Stephenson County, business men of this thriving city,
send your son with his youthful hopes and bounding ambitions to the South.
Let him take that free tongue with him, the free thought and free speech
which he has enjoyed here, and go thefe. He goes there in pursuit of an
honest living in an honest way. How is he met? Broad-hatted Democratic
lawyers demand of him not what he can do, but what does he think. And,
if his views on some political question does not agree with those of the
worthless men who were born there, he is denounced as a carpet-bagger
and shot in the night. I spit upon this cry of carpet-bagger. I believe in
the carpet-bag principle. I believe that there is no State in the Union, no
foot of soil in all its broad domain, upon which I am not to be permitted
to tread, a free man; and where I am not to be permitted to utter what I
think. [Applause.] And the man who would deny me that privilege is a
sneak, and if it comes into the politics of the nation, the war is not yet
ended. I say, throw down every barrier, remove every obstruction, open
every avenue of enterprise. Let us have it for God's sake, if we have to
fight for it; let us have the largest, broadest freedom of thought and
opinion of which any Government is capable. Who are you, what are
you, who talk about carpet-baggers? Were you born here? Hundreds of
thousands of you are from old fatherland, where patriotic feeling is an
instinct with the people, — thousands from the old Empire State. From
all the hills and valleys of New England and New York you have
come here, young men, poor men, filled, however, with that unconquer
able spirit which is characteristic of a carpet-bagger; and you have reared
here the most magnificent empire that the world has ever seen. I say, go
on with the carpet-bag spirit. Send it all over the South. Make its fields
blossom. Make evey swift-running stream active with the wheels of swift-
running machinery ; develop its mines ; increase its resources ; develop every
thing of a material character; educate its people; and then we will have
what we will never have otherwise, — a united, homogenous nationality.
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 8/6. 525
"The Democracy have nominated Samuel J. Tilden on a platform which
reads well enough, but who is he? I desire to say no unkind thing of
Mr. Tilden, but the unkindest thing that I could say of him would be truth
ful things. Suppose I should say that he was born with a Democratic plat
form in one hand and a railroad charter in the other (laughter) ; that, at
the early age of twelve years, he was incorporated ; that he has had no soul
since: that he was consolidated with the Democratic party and run in con
nection with Bill Tweed as a great railroad wrecker, and great railroad
physician, under whose ministrations there have been more corporation fun
erals, and at whose door have been seen larger processions of corporation
hearses, than all the corporations that have ever flourished in all the times
before. [Applause.] I ask this simple question of him: Mr. Tilden, where
were you during the war? What were you doing during the war? It is an
important question for us to ask, I ask the loyal men to-day, whose hearts
and all whose sympathies and feelings were with and are with the great
cause, where was he? Now and then we have a stray affidavit from some
inconspicuous individual that Samuel J. Tilden quietly, modestly, unobtrusively,
was, away down at the bottom of his little corporation heart, a genuine, all-
wool, yard-wide, patriotic man. I have never found it out. I do not believe
in patriotism that is so stealthy. I do not believe in loyalty that is so shy.
I do not believe in an emergency as great as that was that made so good
a man hide the whole of his patriotism under so small a bushel.
' ' Take the case home to yourselves. I ask every man here — I ask every
woman here — if there was, during the dreadful period of war, in the neigh
borhood where you live one solitary individual about whose position there
was any doubt ? Do you know a man so inconspicuous, so obscure, so little
known, that had not his position during the war absolutely and clearly
defined ? And yet, in the presence of this great rebellion, when armies that
numbered millions were making $ie whole continent rock beneath their
tread, when the very globe paused beneath the thunders of that mighty
conflict, when the whole heavens were reddened with the flames of this
great rebellion, this great corporation lawyer, this head of the Democratic
party, this head of New York, this Chairman of the Democratic Committee
of that State, in the midst of those great perils, never uttered one single
word or wrote one single line which betrayed where his sympathies were.
Is there a single instance to which you can point where, when the
hearts of thousands and tens of thousands of mothers were bleeding for
their sons lost in battle, the heart of a mother was comforted or cheered
by one single word that Samuel J. Tilden uttered? Where is the wad-
owed wife to-day, where ever has there been one, whose heart has been
comforted for her husband, filling some grave in the South, by one single
word of cheer that Samuel J. Tilden has ever spoken? And when that
contest was pending, when our own hearts were all in our throats, when
good men trembled everywhere lest this nation, the sacred custodian of
the priceless treasure of free government among men, might die, why
did not a man so conspicuous as he stand up when it seemed that the
very throne of the Almighty was assailed? Why could he not come out
£26 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
from his barricade of law books and railroad bonds and lift up his loyal
voice and say to the Boys in Blue, ' All hail. God bless you. You fight
in the noblest cause that ever lifted up the human heart or nerved the
human arm to action.' But no, not one word from Mr. Tilden — not one
dollar. And, when the clouds hung over us like a pall, having a free pass
upon a railroad, he hied himself to the City of Chicago, and went down
to that disreputable Convention, and while the thunders of the great
conflict were ringing in his ears, put his name to an infamous resolution
which declared that the great war was a failure, and most basely and
submissively sued for peace. By the Eternal, if I had a war record of
that kind back of me I would rather be a dog and bay the moon, —
be a lizard and crawl in the dust, — than to carry a record so damnable
and so infamous on my shoulders, and look a loyal people in the face, and
ask them to vote for me. [Applause.]
"At that time Rutherford B. Hayes was no Chairman of the State Com
mittee. He held no high place ; but he had what was better than a thous
and Chairmanships, — a strong arm and a loyal heart. He went where the
danger was, and came not home until the danger was past.
" History is slow, but it always in the end makes all things right. It does
seem as if upon the threshold of this election all the sacred associations of
a sacred, and a holy, and a noble past crowd full upon us to-night. I stood
but a few weeks ago at the late mansion of Lee at Arlington, just as the
sun was going down behind the hills. Before me were the great, splendid
trees. Beyond them the broad river, and beyond it the Capitol, with flags
flying, for the Confederate House of Representatives was in session ; and
back of me were thousands and thousands of the slain heroes of the great
Republic. It seemed to me as if there might be some almighty agency that
would bid those poor bodies arise from the graves where they have been so
long buried, and go down to that Confederate House and shake their
long, bony fingers in their faces, and say to them, ' Beware. We fought
in a holy cause. We won a noble victory. See to it that no cowardly
recreancy shall fritter away the fruits of our victories.' This is a sol
emn question which presses upon you. History will make these things
right. It has called Abraham Lincoln up to its splendid summits, and
some of these days it will call the noble, silent U. S. Grant to stand
beside him, and Hayes will take his place there too, and, with uncov
ered heads in the presence of those great and lofty characters, the mil
lions of good men and good women of this world will stand and hail and
bless them. And, perhaps, (for it would be likely,) the little, tortuous,
crooked, twisted, wiry spirit of Samuel J. Tilden may undertake to
corkscrew itself up to those majestic heights where its does not belong,
and the Muses of History, looking at the wretched little apology for a
patriot, may say, ' Samuel, take off your whitewash ; take off your mask ;
take down your veneering. There is no patriotism in you. Go down among
those who sought to obstruct a great nation in its glorious march for the
highest eminence of heroic achievement and national renown.' [Cheers for
Hayes and Wheeler and for Mr. Storrs.]"
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 8/6. 52/
The Chicago Tribune, whose report \ve have adopted, made
the following editorial comment upon the speech :
"We surrender space this morning to a full report of the great
oratorical effort of Mr. E. A. Storrs, at Freeport, 111., on Friday
evening. It is a searching and scathing analysis of the hollow
and fraudulent claims of the Democratic party for a restoration
to power, from which it was deposed sixteen years ago in order
that the nation might be saved. We commend its perusal to all
Republicans, as it will nerve them for the work they have to do;
and all Democrats, who are not buried in the mire of party
fealty and are capable of accepting the logic of an irresistible
argument, can read it with profit." ,
In the end of September and first week of October, Mr. Storrs
stumped the northern part of the State of Ohio, addressing large
meetings at Cleveland, Sandusky, Toledo, Mansfield, and Ashland.
In a letter to Hon. Zachariah Chandler, dated October 5th, he
says: — "It is very strange, but it is true, that my speeches
seemed to give satisfaction. I was at three meetings with Gen
eral Sheridan of New Orleans, an excellent speaker and a very
pleasant man to speak with. I am head over heels in law work,
but am speaking occasionally evenings." To the Chairman of
the Ohio State Central Committee, Hon. A. T. Wikoff, he sent
the following account of his tour:
" Since my return from Ohio I have had not one moment's
time to write you concerning' my short tour in your State.
Generally, I will say that it was exceedingly gratifying to me,
and the meetings were all substantial successes. \Ve were unfor
tunate at Cleveland, as the rain interfered, and we began very
late at Toledo ; but I found the old spirit, and at every point
most attentive audiences. I am very partial to indoor meetings,
and found in every instance such a degree of earnest, zealous
listening as is rarely witnessed in political discussion."
Returning to Chicago, Mr. Storrs again addressed an enthusi
astic mass meeting in that city. Being one of many speakers on
this occasion, his remarks were brief. The report of his speech
is as follows:
"This vast and magnificent audience assembled here to-night is a com
plete demonstration, if any were required, that the old Republican party
which has fought so many battles, achieved so many magnificent victories
in the interest of good Government, is stronger and more powerful to-day
528 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
than it has ever been before at any time in the period of its history.
[Cheers.] It had a great mission during the war. It has had a great
mission since the war. Its mission since the war has been to convert the
Democratic party. [Laughter and applause.] And how splendidly it has
succeeded is evidenced in the fact that in their last platform of principles
they unhesitatingly declare that they are opposed to stealing. [Renewed
laughter.] Within twenty-five years we expect to get them to ratify the
whole Decalogue. [Shouts of laughter and applause.] Think of it! The
Democratic party opposed to larceny! [Cheers and laughter.] And in
favor of reform! [Great merriment.] A party not satisfied with stealing
trivial things, but that runs off with a whole State. [Laughter.] A party
that undertook to force the nation to steal the Government, opposed to lar
ceny! [Laughter.] God save the mark! [Renewed mirth.] I desire to
enlarge the proposition of the next Governor of this State. He insists that
the only question before us is, 'Who are the best men for President and
Vice-President of the United States?' It is a broader question, a more
serious question. The question is, Which of the two parties is the safest to
be intrusted with the management of our national affairs? [Applause.] If
you took the Blessed Saviour and put him at the head of the Democratic
party, elected him its President, with its feeling, its history, its traditions,
its spirit, he would be absolutely helpless for the accomplishment of
reform. [Cheers.] I am opposed to the Democratic party because it has
a consistent, unvarying record, injurious to the best interests of the people,
and destructive if carried out, of our national existence. I am opposed to
the Democratic party because it sought the destruction of our cause, and I
don't believe it wise to intrust the affairs of a great empire to the members
of a political organization within ten years after they sought to annihilate it.
[Applause.] The logic is short, it is clear, it is plain, it is unmisunder-
standable. I am prepared to accept with certain qualifications their protesta
tions of repentance, but the repentance has not been long enough.
"I want them to be engaged in good works as long as they have been
engaged in bad works [laughter], and if we wait for the expiration of that
period of probation, we will be dead, and our children afterwards, before
the Democratic party succeed to power. [Laughter.] Mr. Tilden is in favor
of reform. Mr. Tilden — bless me — is in favor of an undivided nationality.
The Democratic party is in favor of purifying the civil service of the Gov
ernment How do they propose to do it? Have they told you? They are
in favor of an honest currency. What currency do they propose to give
you? Have they told you? They say they are in favor of the resumption
of specie payments. How are they to resume? Have they told you? Their
platform is full of denunciations from the beginning to the end, and the cur
ious feature of the platform of 1876 is that it denounces every Democratic
measure since 1860. [Applause.] They insist upon it that the Republican
party which they arraign has impeded that desired result. What financial
policy has the Democratic party had since 1860? None whatever, except
in 1868 they did invent a platform and put forth a principle insisting upon
it that the national debt should be paid in greenbacks, a policy that would
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 8/6. 529
have resulted in the repudiation of the national debt and the destruction
and swamping of every national interest.
"They insist, as I have said, that the civil service shall be purified.
How? By putting them in office? I ask you to run back through the his
tory of that period, not while they have been in power, — but yet their lead
ing men have been in office, — and give me the name of a single leading
man belonging to the Democratic party anywhere who at any time has
proposed any measure for the reform of the Civil Service. When ? Where ?
('Tilden,') I will talk about him presently. You cannot guess these conun
drums. No single living Democrat occupying a prominent political position
since 1860 has proposed a scheme for the reform of the Civil Service.
They have had the power this winter in one branch of the National Gov
ernment. How have they reformed the service? No measure has been
introduced for that purpose. They have had control over the appointments,
and such a raft of Confederates, believing that the Lost Cause was finally
won, was never before seen as gathered in that City of Washington to
catch the crumbs that might fall from the Speaker's table. Tray, Blanche,
and Sweetheart, sutlers, commissaries, privates, and officers in the Confed
erate service from the beginning to the end, knowing that their victory' had
finally been achieved, rushed to Washington by countless hundreds and
made night hideous by their howls for place, demanding the reward of their
services. They got it. They got it. Fitzhugh was appointed Door-keeper.
He is ' a bigger man than old Grant.' [Laughter.] Bounced because .his
shameless incapacity became so conspicuous that no one could overlook it.
What became of his subordinate who knocked down his grocer because he
presented a chivalric Confederate of the South a little bill of which he had
so long neglected payment? Take the entire machinery of this Confederate
House of Representatives and see how they have reformed it ; and to-day,
as I am assured, the nation is filled with tramps, Confederate applicants
for office, hoofing it for home after they have been disappointed. Now, then,
gentlemen, suppose that instead of this accession to power being confined to
one branch, it had taken root in all. Do you believe for one moment
that the personnel of our civil service would have been improved?. I am
told that Tilden has improved the civil service, or proposed to. When?
Where? Where, during the most trying period through which this nation
or any other nation ever passed, was the great reformer of 1876? Filed up
in a safe, secured behind barricades of law-books and railroad bonds. He
peeped out from the corners of his safe and returned, singing that the
result of the war was a failure, and humbly beseeching a treaty of peace.
Manton Marble says that Mr. Tilden is not responsible for that peace reso
lution. Manton Marble is wrong. In 1864 Mr. Tilden quietly slid out of
his office, and joined the congregation of Confederates that met here in the
City of Chicago. He came here, preceded by Isaiah Rynders and his band
of New York Short-boy Reformers, marching up and down the streets of
Chicago with their ears bit off and their noses broken, carrying the olive-
branch, without clothes enough on them to wad a gun, and bellowing
against oppression. [Laughter.]
34
53O LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
"Samuel slid himself into the Convention, and was placed upon the Com
mittee on Resolutions. While the Convention became restive under the long
period of time that they were waiting, Mr. Tilden, as the records of that
Convention will show, rose in his place in the Convention, and as a mem
ber of that Committee assured the Convention that the Committee had all
agreed on their resolutions and that they had simply been passed over to a
sub-committee for revision — the peace resolution and all, the most infamous
resolution ever flirted in the faces of a free people. That resolution, Mr.
Tilden said in this city, in 1864, the entire Committee had unanimously
agreed upon, and that language stands in the record against him, Marble
to the contrary notwithstanding. [Cheers.] That is the history. They ask
us, ' Will you shake the bloody shirt ?' Who is responsible for the blood
on the shirt? [Laughter.] Whose blood is it? I would not as a Republi
can, and, as I think, as a patriotic citizen, needlessly engender the bitter
ness which the war brought about, but if I am to choose, and my thous
ands of fellow- citizens who surround me to-night, if you are to choose — if
the choice is to be laid between the boy who shed his blood that your
nationality might be preserved, and the man who shed his that it might be
destroyed, no gushing talk about shaking hands over the gaping chasm will
make you hesitate long about the decision. [Cheers.] You can call it the
bloody shirt or not, as you please. First, last, and all the while ! As long
as I have the capacity to distinguish the difference of men when public
benefactions are to be bestowed, I am, thank God, in favor of giving them
to him who fought that the nation might live, rather than to him who
fought that the nation might be destroyed. [Cheers.]
"The Democratic party says to us, Let the dead past bury its dead.
They have an extreme reluctance about their record. If we had a record
like theirs, great God, would we not be ashamed of it as they are?
[Laughter and cheers.] If they had a record like ours, written with all its
glories by the finger of Almighty God in letters of fire against the sky, that
all the world might read it, would not they combine together and rejoice,
and be justified in doing so? [Cheers.] Take the glorious old party of
the nation — the old party of freedom which when it first came into
existence crystalized about itself the hopes and loftiest aspirations of the
country. See how it made, with its first success, a Republic unparalleled
in history! See how it sent conquering legions, thousands and hundreds
of thousands and millions, into the field! See how it saved "its great
nationality, the sacred custodian and the priceless treasure of free gov
ernment for all the world! [Cheers.] See how it lifted 4.000,000 of
human beings from the night of barbarism and slavery into the pure
atmosphere of American freedom. [Loud cheers.] And see how, having
made them free men, it made them citizens and boldly took and clothed
them, thank God, in all the rights and privileges of citizenship. The old
party four years ago stood a perfect storm of slander and calumny such as
no party ever before encountered, but it said, 'We have made you freemen,
we have made you citizens; we will clothe you with all the privileges which
others enjoy, and if in the States where you live the privileges enjoyed
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 8/6. 531
under the Constitution are denied to you, this great nationality that to-day,
thank- God, we call the United States of America, coming from the clouds
where its head has been among the stars, will with its strong arm do for
you, the poorest and meanest citizen of the soil, what your State refuses to
do for you.' [Vociferous cheering.] That is the record of this party.
"It found a currency almost worthless ; steadily, gradually, and surely all
the while it has been appreciating its value. It has made here a national
ity greater and more powerful than the world ever saw before. [Cheers.]
Yet we are told — told by Senator Doolittle last night, and I speak of him
with terms of the highest respect — that the party has been ruined because
it passed a legal-tender act and pledged the faith of the nation that
the 5-20 bonds should be paid in gold ! They pick out an instance
here and there where a Secretary has fallen from grace, and they say,
' Behold our Reformer, Mr. Tilden ; see what he has done. Didn't he crush
out Tweed?" Way back in 1864 the cordial relations between Tweed and
Tilden could* hardly be described. Way down to 1865 they were like broth
ers. In the election of 1868, as Chairman of the State Central Committee
of New York, Mr. Tilden devised a plan by which the votes of that great
State were wrested from Grant by the most gigantic fraud that was ever
practiced upon a people, and given to his adversary. This Mr. Tilden, the
Reformer, after having for years and years come at the beck and call of
Mr. Tweed, after Tweed had been exposed by the Republican press and
the Republican party, jumps on to the carriage when it is all ready to go
and the streets in order for travel, and takes a ride on it at Republican
expense. [Loud cheers and laughter.]
"Who tried Tweed? Let us have it out. Tweed was tried by a Repub
lican Judge, before a Republican jury, prosecuted by a Republican
Attorney-General, convicted in the good old Republican way, sent to a
Democratic jail [laughter], in charge of a Democratic jailer, and escaped in the
old Democratic style. [Renewed laughter.] Thus ends that lesson of reform.
[Cheers.] Now, gentlemen, I had not intended to speak here until late
this afternoon, and I am going to talk no longer. [Cries of ' Go on.']
But I do feel magnificently assured by this magnificent demonstration
here to-night — a grander one Chicago never witnessed, a more hopeful
and inspiring one this people never saw. It is a sure presage of victory.
It indicates with absolute certainty that with such men as we have at
the head of our ticket — our candidate for President, fighting in an earn
est capable way the battle of the people in the front, while Tilden was
back in the rear, — with such leaders we deserve success, and animated and
encouraged by the old spirit I believe we will have success. [Cheers.]
And now, gentlemen, three cheers for Hayes and Wheeler.
"The crowd gave an enthusiastic response, and Mr. Storrs retired."
CHAPTER XXV.
"CONSTRUCTIVE CONTEMPT" AND "TRIAL BY JURY."
THE CASE OF WILBUR F. STOREY FOR CRITICISING A GRAND JURY — MR.
STORRS* VIEWS UPON THE SUBJECT — HISTORY OF THE LAW OF CONSTRUC
TIVE CONTEMPT — ILLUSTRATION OF POWER OF LUCID YET COMPREHENSIVE
INTERPRETATION OF A LAW QUESTION — INFLUENCING A JUDGE — A LECT
URE ON THE ORIGIN, HISTORY, AND MERITS OF THE JURY SYSTEM.
T am old-fashioned enough to be a thorough believer in the
determination of all questions of guilt or innocence by a
jury. Investigation of the history of English law-development,
has satisfied me that judges clothed with anything like arbitrary
power were infinitely more dangerous than juries, and that the
doctrine of constructive crimes was judge-made law, as mere
creations of judicial invention." These words were uttered by Mr.
Storrs in March of 1875, in response to a request by Wilbur F.
Storey, the famous, but now deceased editor of the Chicago
Times, for his opinion of constructive contempt.
Judge Williams of the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois,
had taken umbrage at some severe criticisms which had appeared
in the Times directed against the character of a grand jury, by
which some members were styled "bummers" and " vagabonds;"
and had issued a rule against Mr. Storey to show cause why he
should not be punished for contempt. The proceedings, novel in
modern courts, excited much comment in the legal fraternity and'
in the general community. The press, editorally and by com
ments of the readers, had always in Chicago expressed in the
freest manner opinions upon jurymen, indictments, and verdicts.
If a representative journal was to be punished for criticism upon
the grand jury, if such criticism was made with an honest pur
pose to expose corrupt practices, to what degree of severity could
532
"CONSTRUCTIVE CONTEMPT" AND "TRIAL BY JURY." 533
not a court punish anyone who in private or public might, to
the knowledge of the judge, talk boldly upon the subject of
the verdicts, for instance, of a petit jury; for the duties of a
petit jury are much more important and serious in their
character, after all, than those of a grand jury. The latter
simply presents the indictment, the former tries and deter
mines the question of guilt or innocence. The press through
out the West took the ground that the due administration
of justice is promoted by exposing corruption either in judges or
in juries, that there was no means of exposure equal to freedom
of comment by the press, and, as was argued before Judge
Williams himself " to shut the door against an investigation into
the truth or falsity of the charges would be to throw a barrier
about corrupt jurors, and to protect them in their corruption. If
the particular juror feels aggrieved, let him proceed in the usual
way by indictment or civil suit for libel. The truth then will
come out. If he is innocent, he will be vindicated; if he is
guilty, he must suffer as he deserves." As was usually the case,
whenever any public topic arose, the opinion of Mr. Storrs was
instantly sought for publication, and, as the question will for
many years to come be of fresh importance, Mr. Storey's report
of an interview published the morning when the question was to
adjudicated, especially as the interview is a capital illustration of
the crisp and direct power Mr. Storrs possessed to review and
express himself, merits copious quotation. In reply to a question
as to where the doctrine of constructive contempt had its greatest
growth, he said:
"The doctrine flourished amazingly in the English courts for hundreds of
years. Thousands of victims, innocent of any actual offense, perished at the
stake and on the scaffold and at the block under it. An effort was made
to transplant this species of judicial barbarism to our own country, and in
such dread was the doctrine of constructive treason held, and so serious
were the apprehensions of the people as to the extent to which judges might
be inclined to carry it, that an end was put to this question of purely argu
mentative treason by incorporating in the Constitution the solemn declaration
that there should be no punishment for such a crime as that of constructive
treason. For hundreds of years, writers and speakers were subjected to pun
ishment under informations for libel, not upon the ground that their utter
ances or that their writings were in fact libelous, but that they were con
structively so, and hence whether they were libelous or not depended not
upon any fixed rule of law, but upon the freak of a judge to carry his doc-
534 LTFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
trine of construction to its utmost possible limit. ... To a certain extent
this relic of a half barbarous age still exists in England. It is happily abol
ished in this country, and. no man can be convicted of the crime of libel
unless he has actually been guilty of the offense ; in other words, he cannot
be construed into guilt. Not content with determining questions of fraud
upon the exact facts proven, the courts adopted the ingenious method of
finding fraud constructively, and though a man's intentions might have been
never so pure, and his purposes never so honest, yet the ingenious judge
would make an absolutely honest line of conduct fraud by construction.
This line of judical mis-reasoning is also rapidly passing away with the torch
and the thumb-screw, and in but a few years we shall find nothing of it
except what we see in museums dedicated to the preservation of unused
and worn-out atrocities. Judges have ever been particularly anxious to
maintain and preserve what they call their dignity. Many of them hav.e
seemed to be laboring under the impression that the respect in which they
were held by the public depended not so much upon the manner in which
they conducted themselves as judges, as upon the fear which they might
excite sufficiently to restrain any criticism upon their judicial conduct.
. . . Out of these mediaeval theories of constructive crime, and running
along in parallel lines with them, has grown the doctrine of constructive con
tempt. No exploded legal fiction has ever fallen into such utter actual con
tempt as the doctrine of constructive contempt. It is quite as dangerous
as any of the other species of constructive crimes to which I have referred.
Indeed it is more so, for from the opinion of the judge who thinks that
either he or his court has been brought into contempt by a criticism upon
it, there has been no appeal ; and no despot ever reigned in any age or in
any country whose power was more uncontrollably absolute than the power
of a judge when called to pass upon the correctness or the integrity of his
own judicial conduct. It is hardly necessary to elaborate upon the injustice
of this rule of law."
As to who were the judges first to apply the rule of con
structive contempt, he answered:
"It is curious to note the source from which the doctrine of constructive
contempt, now so much relied upon,(proceeds. It found its origin, not among
pure judges, but among corrupt ones — among the most corrupt judges of a cor
rupt age. It is safe now to tell the truth of Lord Chief Justice Billing. He is
dead and has been dead for three or four hundred years. The world holds him
and his memory in utter contempt. The contempt is not constructive but actual,
no more actual than the contempt which fell for him at the time he
occupied the bench. But Chief Justice Billing, who was a mere elastic tool
to a corrupt king and a corrupt court, would brook no criticism upon his
conduct. Whenever it was brought to his ears, he summarily brought
before him those who had seen fit to speak in terms of criticism upon his
arbitrary rulings, and punished them under the doctrine of constructive con
tempt, without a why or a wherefore. He is one of the founders of the
law of constructive contempt. ... It is safe to speak of Sir Robert Tresilian,
"CONSTRUCTIVE CONTEMPT" AND "TRIAL BY JURY." 53$
who was beheaded for his crimes in 1389. He had been for many years
Lord Chief Justice of England. His biographer says of him that he was
utterly ignorant of law, but yet he had the most supreme opinion of his own
dignity and of the dignity of the position which he held.
"Although he violated every idea of constitutional liberty in Great Brit
ain, he would brook no criticism upon the corruption of his official conduct,
but summarily punished for contempt his critics wherever he could find
them. We credit him also as being one of the authors of the doctrine of
constructive contempt. Many of those distinguished judges who infused
into the doctrine of constructive contempt all the vigor which it ever pos
sessed, and all which it now possesses, were beheaded or otherwise summar
ily disposed of. The people would at last get the upper hand, and, how
ever much they might have been punished for the constructive crime, they
finally gave an actual and very practical exhibition of the opinion which
they entertained of the judge who had thus punished them." . . . "Chief
Justice Hyde was a bright and shining light in the history of the English
judiciary ! He was absolutely furious in his efforts to suppress what he
called the licentiousness of the press. He was as fawning and suppliant a
creature of the crown and his royal master as any spaniel that ever licked
his master's boot. Criticism of any act of the government (whose tool he
was), even of the mildest character, assumed in his eyes the crime of con
structive high treason, and he punished it accordingly. Criticism of his own
conduct in those cases, because entirely innocent, he called 'constructive
contempt,' and he punished those offenses as he designated them accord
ingly." . . . "Chief Justice Kelynge has probably more often been cited in
his country in support of the exercise of some arbitrary right than any
other of the English judges. A more truly subservient and corrupt judge
never lived. He compelled jurors to convict under his charges of construct
ive crimes, and if they did not convict as he desired, he fined and impris
oned them, holding that, in the not following his charge, they were guilty
of contempt — constructive contempt. On one occasion he fined an entire
jury, and imprisoned them because they brought in a verdict against his
direction. This, he argued and insisted, was a constructive contempt of
his dignity as Lord Chief Justice of England. The list is a long one, and
I need not pursue it further, but it is hardly to be expected that from a
source so foul any very clear stream could flow."
After commenting upon the fact that the American people
would not tolerate the doctrine of constructive crime of any
nature and that particularly they are not disposed to repose in
the hands of any one man the arbitrary and uncontrolled power of
himself determining whether the offense of which the party brought
before him is charged is an offense or not, beyond all power of
redress "or appeal, he said in relation to the right of newspapers
to criticise grand juries and the action of judges :
"The right to criticise the conduct of public officers of any character,
536 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
judicial or otherwise, is now as thoroughly settled as any principle of law
ever was. Judges and jurors are public officers in this sense. Their con
duct as such is the legitimate subject of newspaper remark and criticism.
For such criticism the editor is not liable, is not holden to absolute infalli
bility of judgment. The law requires of him nothing but integrity of pur
pose. If infallibility of judgment was required, free criticism would be at
an end. The last grand jury were a public body, and while their sessions
were held in secret, the result of their deliberations was made public the
moment the indictments which they had found were presented to the court.
Upon the justice or injustice of the course which they pursued ; upon the
integrity of the motives by which they were actuated in reaching the results
which they did reach ; upon the general intelligence and judgment which
they had evinced in their deliberations, as evidenced by those results, every
citizen, in print or out of print, had a right to comment. If in finding
certain indictments that grand jury was actuated by motives personal in
their character, if spite influenced their deliberations and directed their con
clusions, the public should know the facts, and through no other agency
than that of the newspaper press could the public well be advised of the
facts. Grand juries have been in this city summoned and organized for a
specific purpose, for the purpose of finding particular indictments against
particular individuals. This practice should not be tolerated. It subjects
the reputation of every citizen to the caprices of an utterly irresponsible
body, and if no word of comment or criticism can be passed upon them or
their doings, such a thing as freedom of speech or of the press does not here
exist. The question is not, whether the criticisms which the Chicago Times
passed upon this conduct of the grand jury referred to were sound or
unsound. With that question Judge Williams has no business to deal. He
does not occupy his place upon the bench for the purpose of deciding any
such questions. He would, were the question fairly presented to him, be
driven to the necessity of holding that the conduct of the grand jury might
be criticised, and holding that the propriety of the criticism must pass to
the decision of another tribunal. If the criticism were malicious, utterly
unfounded, without ground to support it, the critic can be punished. If it
should turn out that the criticism were in fact unfounded, but that the
critic had a right to believe and did believe at the time he passed his cen
sure that they were well founded, then is the critic justified."
. . . "I can imagine such a case as a direct interference by a news-
r paper, pending a trial, with the trial itself — an attempt by malicious attacks
upon either court, jury, or counsel to influence the verdict. This would
probably be called a constructive contempt. It would in fact be an actual
contempt, although not committed in the actual presence of the court. But
to criticise or denounce the action already taken of either a grand or petit
jury may be libelous, and if so should be determined by a jury. It is not a
contempt actual or constructive. The articles complained of in The Times
were, as I understand, all published after the indictments had been found
and returned into court. And if The Times maliciously defamed the grand
jury, or any of its members, it can be punished in the usual way by a full
"CONSTRUCTIVE CONTEMPT" AND "TRIAL BY JURY. 537
examination as to the truth or falsity of its charges. The trouble and the
danger is that in proceedings for contempt the question of the truth of the
alleged defamatory matter cannot be inquired into, and a journalist may be
imprisoned for saying of a jury that in a particular case it rendered a cor
rupt verdict, even though every man upon the jury had received a bribe.
Under such a rule the press is gagged and even the most corrupt jurors are
shielded from criticism, exposure, or punishment.. Judge Williams cannot
intend to decide those questions, and yet, in an effort to punish The Times
for contempt of court, that very question he must decide. It is idle to say
that the articles complained of were an interference with the due course of
the administration of justice. The acts of which complaint was made were
complete when The Times undertook to censure them. The indictments
had been found, and The Times expressed, and claims that it had the
clear right to do so, its opinion of the grand jury, and of its action. Pos
sibly Judge Williams may deem it his duty to punish The Times for a con
structive contempt of his court and its proceedings. Possibly he may think
that this expression of my opinion is an interference with his judicial func
tions, but if he reaches either of these conclusions he will place himself
alongside of and in company with, not those great names who have given
character to the administration of justice by their learning and by their integ
rity, but with those venal and corrupt judges who have left an indelible
stain upon the history of the common law. He cannot prefer the society
of Kelynge and Hyde and Tresilian and Jeffreys to that of Holt and Ray
mond and Hale and Mansfield. The selection rests with him."
The result of the issue before Judge Williams was that he
at last saw fit not to inflict punishment upon Mr. Storey, and
afterwards he stated that had "an idea that Mr. Storrs' clear
headed talk perused after breakfast" before going upon the bench
of adjudication "had something to do with it." The law school
of the Northwestern University, immediately after this public agi
tation, solicited Mr. Storrs to lecture upon the "Origin, History,
and Merits of Trial by Jury." He complied, and early in Febru
ary, 1876, delivered an interesting lecture upon this subject. After
having discussed the origin and history of jury trials, he touched
upon the merits and defects of the system, arguing that, while
jurors frequently erred, yet that no better system for the trial of
questions of fact had ever, as experience demonstrated, been
devised. That we have at times incompetent, ignorant, and, per
haps, corrupt jurors — he claimed — proves nothing against the sys
tem. Precisely the same line of reasoning would lead to the
overthrow of our entire judicial system, for, taking the country at
large, there can be found many ignorant and incompetent and a
few corrupt judges.
538 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
"That we have unfit men for jurors," he continued, "falls far short of
proving that we ought to dispense with jury trials. I insist that if proper
care were taken in the selection of our jurors, many of the evils of which
we complain would be removed, and that the fault has rested in some
measure, at least, upon the courts who are frequently too ready to excuse
from service upon juries competent and intelligent men who have been
summoned for that purpose." . . "Our system of delivering to the
jury written instructions . prepared by counsel also tends to mislead and
confuse them. These instructions are in the nature of abstract legal
propositions. All taken together they scarcely if ever furnish a com
plete view of the entire case. Prepared by counsel, they are intended to
present simply so much of the law as will be advantageous to them. The
result is that they are often conflicting, and darken rather than enlighten
the judgment, and furnish no solid or satisfactory basis upon which the
jury may stand in endeavoring to reach a verdict." .... "That even good
judges do under the present absurd system give conflicting instructions is
too well known to every practicing lawyer to require proof. Cases of that
character abound in our reports. The Supreme Court of this State, in a case
reported in the 63 Illinois Reports, commenting upon the instructions given f
by the Circuit Judge, say: 'These instructions are in direct opposition —
what could the jury do? They must select between them, and they prob
ably relied upon the first instruction. This was not the law, and was in
violation of the statute.' Again in 61 Illinois Reports, 388, the Supreme
Court, criticising the instructions by the Circuit Judge, say: 'But even had
it stated the rule correctly it would only have contradicted the first
instruction, and it would not have appeared which the jury followed.'
These are by no means isolated cases. They are of very frequent occur
rence. Either of the Circuit Judges who gave in the cases referred to these
conflicting instructions was quite capable of writing a clear and consistent
charge to the jury. Moreover, were this duty imposed upon me Court
where it belongs instead of being shifted to counsel where it does not
belong, the Court would be compelled to give much closer attention to the
trial as it progressed than they now do, and would understand bcth the
facts and the law infinitely better."
The question of abolishing the system of juries is so grave
and existent that, now as then, the presentation of the position,
and the advanced grounds of such a position, of so successful a
lawyer, both with jury and judge, cannot but interest all classes.
One reference in this lecture to the groundlessness of the state
ment that the larger portion of appeals from jury trials in the
lower courts are reversed and remanded by supreme courts,
with consequent increase of litigation and expense, was as follows :
"In the Sixty-first Illinois Reports there were fifty-six cases reversed. Of
these, three were reversed on the ground that the verdict of the jury was
against evidence ; two were reversed because the finding of the Court was
"CONSTRUCTIVE CONTEMPT" AND "TRIAL BY JURY." 539
against evidence; and fifty-one were reversed because the Courts erred in
rulings upon questions of law. In the sixty-second volume there are reported
eighty-two reversals. Of these, four were reversed because the verdicts
were against evidence and seventy-eight on the ground of errors committed
by the Court. In the sixty-third (the last) volume of our State Reports,
there are eighty-one reversals. Of these, ten are on the ground that the
verdict of the jury was against evidence. Eight cases tried by the Court,
a jury having been waived, were reversed on the ground that the findings
were against evidence, and sixty-three because of errors committed by the
courts in rulings upon questions of law. Thus, out of an aggregate of 219
cases reported in the last three volumes of our State Reports, 202 were
reversed for errors made by the Judges.
" The record certainly does not furnish very strong reasons for abolishing
jury trials and submitting the determination of questions both of the law and
of fact to the Courts. It would rather seem to indicate that, while we are
engaged in the work of reform, it is barely possible that the Bench may be
improved.
"I now advocate as complete a severance as possible of the functions of
Court and jury, confining the jury exclusively to the determination of ques
tions of fact and the Court to the divisions of questions of law. I am well
convinced that the interests of justice are conserved by observing these dis
tinctions, and that in the long run nothing but harm will ensue from
either Court or jury trenching upon the province of the other."
After exhaustively tracing the judicial history of England
through a period of three hundred years, until the jury stepped
firmly between the Crown, represented by the judges, and the
rights of a free press and free speech, he proceeded:
"Our own country furnishes abundant examples of appointments to judi
cial positions as a reward for political services already rendered, or with a
view to judicial services to be rendered.". . . "It may, however, now be
truthfully said that our Judges are, as a rule, eminently upright, pure, and
incorruptible men. But they are swayed by the same motives which influ
ence other men. The possession of unlimited power would render them
dangerous and despotic, as it has others; and if we would continue our
judiciary pure and upright we will withhold from them the power to decide
the facts, or to interfere with juries in the decision of those questions."
CHAPTER XXVI.
SOME GREAT CRIMINAL TRIALS.
TRIAL OF RODOLPHUS K. TURNER FOR FORGERY — CONTENTS OF A FORGER'S
TRUNK — TRIAL OF FIVE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR FRAUD — HOW A
YOUNG CLERK KEPT CHECK ON HIS EMPLOYER— AN ARSON CASE GOTTEN,
UP BY AN INSURANCE COMPANY TURNS OUT TO BE A MALICIOUS PROSECU
TION, WITH BLACKMAILING FEATURES.
THE year 1877 was a busy one for Mr. Storrs. In addition
to his labors in winding up the Chicago whisky cases, he
was engaged in the trial of an unusually large number of impor
tant criminal cases, which attracted much interest at the time,
and each of which occupied several months in preparation. So
far as results were concerned, he worked harder that year than
in any other of his professional life.
The first case was that of a young Quincy lawyer named
Rodolphus K. Turner, accused of being accessory to, and having
procured, the forgery of title deeds to property. The title to this
property was in litigation in a Chancery Court in Chicago, and
was claimed by a lawyer named Hill. Mr. Turner produced
deeds showing a conveyance to him of various tracts of it, and
others in which the title was traced through his grantors as far
back as the original Government patents. Mr. Hill claimed that
these were forgeries, and Mr. Turner was indicted and tried in
the Cook County Criminal Court. The prosecution was assisted
by Hon. W. H. Barnum, who had been Mr. Hill's solicitor in
the chancery proceeding, and for the defence Mr. Storrs appeared
along with the Hon. O. H. Browning of Quincy. The testimony
was of a most sensational character, and proved a long train of
forgeries perpetrated by a man named Reid, in whose trunk were
540
SOME GREAT CRIMINAL TRIALS. 541
found implements for forgery, including bottles of different shades
of ink to suit the pretended age of the document, and copies of
the seals of the different States in which the alleged conveyances
were made. There was proof that Turner had been in consulta
tion with this man Reid, but his employment of Reid, or his
guilty knowledge of his doings, was not made out to the satis
faction of the jury. The proof was enough, however, to create a
doubt in their minds. His brother, who was indicted along with him,
was acquitted, — anything that he had done having been done at the
instance of Rodolphus; as to the latter, the jury disagreed, and
no further proceedings were taken against him.
The next was the trial of five of the Commissioners of Cook
County on the charge of defrauding the county in the matter of
contracts for supplies for the county institutions. A member of
the Board had been taking contracts in the names of his clerks,
with the connivance of other Commissioners, who used to meet
and divide the profits after the bills had been audited and paid,
and who were known as the "Bean Club." Their* proceedings
leaked out through the fear of discovery on the part of the
warden of the poor-house, and four or five weeks were consumed
in a tedious investigation, involving minute book-keeping details.
Mr. Storrs was retained by the county to assist the State's
Attorney, and the trial resulted in an acquittal of the implicated
Commissioners, who, however, were soon thereafter retired to
private life.
Mr. Storrs' argument in this case was a splendid effort, and it
is to be hoped will some day be published in full. Only an
outline of it can be given here. He first addressed himself to
the exposition of the law of conspiracy, under which the defen
dants were indicted. He said that this case involved directly the
question whether the people had any control over their servants.
A conspiracy among public servants to defraud the public was,
in his view, infinitely more dangerous than an isolated case of
defrauding the public, where the individual must take his chances
of detection. Here was a combination formed for the purpose of
regularly and systematically defrauding the public; and a most
important and dangerous feature of his corrupt arrangement was
to provide against detection at the outset, by including within
the combination those whose duty it was to detect and prevent
542 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
it. Judge Smith, who was one of the counsel for the defendants,
had made an appeal to the common law on this point, and Mr.
Storrs said:
"The man does not live who can tell you exactly what the common law
is any more than he can tell you what the English Constitution is. It is in
no book. It is in no number of books. It is partly tradition, partly statute^
partly custom, partly decision, and the balance conjecture. Under this old
common law, they used to try cases by wager of battle, and yet brother
Smith tells you that the common law was the perfection of reason. This
old common law used to hang people for larceny.
"This old common law has its chief element of wisdom in the fact that
it continually changes to adapt and adjust itself to the growing necessities
of the age, and this statute is right in the line of the spirit of the common
law, for if there is anything true as an historical fact it is that our greatest
danger is from official corruption. We are a tax-ridden and a tax-robbed
people. We are tax-ridden and tax-robbed because the politician, the'politi-
cal adventurer, the contractor, the schemer, combines with the official to -
rob and plunder the public. There is not a department of the public
service, National, State, or City, in which these dangerous conspirators have
not entered ; and if there is any one great cause to which the depression
of our trade and of the legitimate industries of our country may be traced, it is
that, entering every avenue of the public service, alarming and dangerous con
spiracies of such a character as the one here charged have corrupted the
very springs of our public life. That burden, rob, plunder the public. I
dont say that these defendants have done that. I am speaking of the gen
eral nature of this charge, because I desire to impress upon you the gra.v
ity and importance of the case and of the question."
One of the clerks of the implicated Commissioner had kept a
pass-book, in which he had noted down the orders from the
county, the quantities actually supplied, and the quantities
charged for. Commenting on this book, Mr. Storrs discriminated
between the young man who had allowed himself to be made the
tool of his superior, and the Commissioner who had betrayed
his public trust. The clerk had been indicted as arr accessory:
"This book is precisely what he claimed it to be when he was before
that Grand Jury. It is a record tremendously telling and decisive in its
character of the great and awful fact for the first time displayed with abso
lute certainty, that during these years this County was plundered right and
left by as unscrupulous and as wicked a ring as was ever organized. They
say however this book was kept for his own protection. Quite possible .
"Now the knowledge of Carpenter was not a merely passive knowledge.
It was not such a knowledge as a stranger might have who would have
blundered into that store and seen ten barrels of sugar brought down,
and only five sent. It is an active Darticipating and assisting knowledge.
SOME GREAT CRIMINAL TRIALS. 543
•
It is an indispensable knowledge, and the assistance which he rendered was
absolutely indispensable in order that the scheme might succeed. Nor was
this merely an isolated instance. Why, this book tells a fearful story when
it is matched with this testimony. Beginning on the ist day of July, it
runs straight along every single month, without a single exception during that
entire year. Here is this memorandum of the goods and property of which
the County of Cook was plundered : not an isolated case of robbery, but a
consistent, steady-going, regular, unintennitting scheme of plunder. Now,
in view of this state of facts, as this book discloses a consistently pursued,
scheme, what have you to say about the crime of Conspiracy, as com
pared with the crime of an independent larceny ? A man who steals from
one man commits a crime ; but those individuals who conspire and agree
together not that they shall steal once, but that they shall rob continuously,
having organized a system of crime, which in the earlier and better days
would have defied belief, and the execution of which in cases of this char
acter is utterly impossible without the active connivance and assistance of
the officials.
"Gentlemen of the Jury, do you think that the statute is a little harsh?
The story that that book tells, coupled with the statement of Carpenter
discloses a danger and peril from which every good citizen will recoil in
terror, and for protection against which we have no relief except in the
Courts which are all that is left, that is pure and uncorrupted. It is the
history of these great combinations, that they carry their operations, not
merely into the administrative parts of the Government but elsewhere they
have mounted the bench, and dragged down the Judiciary to their corrupt
level. Hence it is that here this case possesses the transcendent importance
which I have already indicated. Here for the first time a fair trial is to be
.had ; here for the first time has a gross, a corrupt, an organized gang of
public plunderers been brought into a struggle of life and death with the
public whom for these long years they have been plundering, and it is a
pretty serious question what the result of such a contest shall be. I have
no sort of disposition to pursue Mr. Carpenter, not the slightest, feeling of
vindictiveness against him, not a particle, as you will see presently ; but
this is not a tribunal of sentiment. This is not an eleemosynary concern.
We are here engaged in a very manly business, that of administering jus
tice, and I hope that we have finally passed through this unhealthy and
unnatural period of sentimentalism characteristic more of the school-girl,
than the full grown man — a jury which would lament the sorrows of Cap
tain Kidd, which would sigh over the griefs of the beautiful bandit, and
which would mourn over the sorrows of the black-eyed pirate.
"Gentlemen of the Jury, it is high time for the exercise of some mascu
line virtues. Here is this young man, guilty. His interests, and the interests
of society absolutely demand that you should say so; but, in determining
the extent and measure of his punishment, I think that your regard should
be had to the consideration that he was the weak and trembling, and help
less tool of Periolat.
544 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
•
"He kept this book for his own protection he .says. I will tell you what
I think he kept it for. He knew the reckless character of that gang and
of its head. He kept this memorandum thinking that possibly the time
might come when by means of that little book he might put his thumb
upon Mr. Periolat, and exercise a little coercion over him. Now 1 submit
to you if that was not the reason he kept that book? Why it is just as
clear, and just as plain that Carpenter, assisting in these great crimes, made
up his mind that the time might come when he would want perhaps to
squeeze Periolat.
"He made his memoranda and never told Mr. Periolat or Mr. Korsythe
about it. He took it home and kept it there, as you would keep an old
family tea-pot that had come down through generations behind you.
" He is a young man ; I want to see him detached from this ring. I
want to see Mr. Carpenter, who has something of a future before him I
hope, break with this combination and make some new associates ; and I
want to see him do it, by ranging himself on the side of the people, where
he belongs. A fine within the limit of his means is pretty good notice to
Mr. Carpenter and to all other young men, notice sufficent that there is a
higher duty than that which an employe owes to any one man. It is the
supreme duty which every honest man owes to the interest of the great
community in which he lives. With these observations on Mr. Carpenter,
I will leave him in your hands."
During the closing arguments in the case, the lawyers got
into a dispute as to whether certain documents had been
properly put in evidence or not. They were essential to the case
for the State, and the failure to get them into the record would
have been of great service to the defence. Mr. Smith contended
that they had not been formally offered and admitted; and Mr.
Storrs, with equal pertinacity, insisted that they had. Finally
Mr. Smith, drawing himself up to his full height, exclaimed,
"Well, if my word is not as good as that of Mr. Storrs any day,
I propose to leave the county." It was laughable to see Mr.
Storrs get up, in his dry, cool way, and at once respond, —
"Good bye, Smith;" and then, turning to the jury, say, " Friend
Smith is going to leave the county."
The jury found the defendants not guilty, but this did not
save them from the verdict of public opinion, which was
very emphatically pronounced at the next election.
Another case which excited much comment was the trial of
several prominent citizens of Freeport, Illinois, on the charge of
burning an extensive watch factory there of which they were
proprietors, with intent to defraud the insurance companies.
SOME GREAT CRIMINAL TRIALS. 545
The factory was established by a company organized at the
instance of the late Eber D. Ward, the great Michigan capitalist,
for the manufacture of what was known as the Hoyt watch.
Among the stockholders were Loyal L. Munn and Lewis K.
Scofield of Freeport, and Professor Allen A. Griffith who acted
as Mr. Ward's representative in organizing a joint stock company,
and securing the location of the factory at Freeport. In orga
nizing the joint-stock company, Professor Griffith met with the
president of the German Insurance Company of Freeport, and so
impressed him with the importance of establishing a factory for
the manufacture of watches in that town that Mr. Hettinger also
took stock, and became an active spirit in the concern. The
factory was burned down on the night of the 2ist of October
1875. At the time of the fire, various companies had polices of
insurance upon the property, to the amount of $30,000. Of
this sum, $10,000 was upon the building, and $20,000 upon the
machinery, tools, and fixtures. The companies insuring were ten
in all. It was proved upon the trial that the building alone cost
$18,000, and the value of the tools, fixtures, and machinery, was
estimated by appraisers at $35,000. Nevertheless, two years after
the fire occurred, owing to local gossip, a grand jury of the
county, on which were several officers and representatives of the
German Insurance company, found an indictment against Messrs.
Munn, Scofield, and Griffith for arson. Mr Leonard Swett of
Chicago was engaged by the companies to assist the prosecution,
and the defence was conducted by Mr. Storrs, assisted by local
attorneys.
The proof abundantly showed that the charge was one of the
most scandalous attacks on private character ever brought in a
court of justice to save the insurance companies from paying
their just risks. It was not only proved, as already stated, that
the real value of the property was in excess of the insurance,
but that the company had just purchased new machinery, then
in transitu, which if it had arrived before the fire would have
brought the value of the property up to nearly $70,000. In
addition to this, Judge Bailey of Freeport, now an honored
member of the Appellate Court for the First District of Illinois,
testified that about the 1 7th or 1 8th of October 1875, Messrs.
Griffith, Fry, Munn, and Scofield came to his office to consult
35
546 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
with reference to giving proper securities on the property of
the factory for the purpose of borrowing money to pay the
existing indebtedness of the company and put in about $10,000
additional working capital. The Judge told them that a schedule
of the property would be required, and that the old schedule
then in his safe was not sufficient because it did not include the
new machinery. There was then outstanding a note of $20,000
upon which they were liable, and they finally agreed to endorse
the paper of the company, carry the existing indebtedness, and
furnish $10,000 additional capital. Judge Bailey was called out
of town on the 2Oth of October by professional business, othtr-
wise the papers would have been executed fixing upon these
very defendants an additional responsibility of $io,OOO. And on
the very next day the fire occurred.
The pretence that these defendants fired the building to defraud
the insurance companies was thus shown by incontestible demon
stration to be utterly untrue. The agents of the Freeport com
pany had been at work for two years trying to get up evidence
against them, and even wrote Professor Griffith, holding out
valuable inducements to him to turn State's evidence against his
fellow-directors. At the time they paid the loss on their policy,
they took a bond for $3000 from Mr. Fry, conditioned to refund
the money to them in the event it should be discovered that
the fire was a fraudulent one. They afterwards proposed to Mr.
Fry to withdraw the prosecution provided he would quietly pay
them back the $3000. This infamous proposition was rejected^
and then came an indictment found by a grand jury on which
were several officers of this German Insurance Company, for
arson committed to defraud the "American Insurance Company
of Philadelphia," which had had nothing to do with their pro
ceedings.
At the close of the case for the people, Mr. Swett announced
the purpose of the prosecution to proceed no further, and asked
that the case be dismissed for want of evidence. The State's
Attorney agreed with Mr. Swett that the facts in the case were
not such as would justify a conviction. "Indeed," he said, "they
fall so far short of it that my own judgment has been, and is,
that they are not sufficient to justify us in prolonging this case
further." Judge Brown instructed the jury that there was no
SOME GREAT CRIMINAL TRIALS. 547
evidence to convict the defendants, or either of them ; whereupon
they immediately rendered a verdict of not guilty, and not con
tent with that, after consulting in their jury room, returned into
court with a resolution censuring the grand jury for finding what
they called ''this blackmailing indictment." Judge Brown said,
that inasmuch as the grand jury was a part of the organization
and machinery of the Court, he could not receive any report
which reflected upon them ; but so far as the resojution expressed
the feelings of the jury as to the character of the proof against
the defendants, he was in entire accord with it.
Thus closed this case, — a remarkable one in many particulars,
and most of all as illustrating how easy it is to elevate idle
gossip and personal slanders into such proportions as that it
should receive apparent endorsement by a grand jury; remark
able also as exhibiting not only the absolute innocence of the
defendants, but the guilty motives of those who conceived and
promoted the prosecution.
CHAPTER XXVII,
THE TRIAL OF ALEXANDER SULLIVAN.
THE CASE AS VIEWED BY MR. STORKS— THE EVIDENCE AND ITS TALE —
.FORCED WARFARES OF RELIGIONS — THE TRIAL SCENES — ACQUITTAL OF
THE ACCUSED — SUBSEQUENT HISTORY OF CHIEF PARTICIPANTS.
ONE of the great cases in which the remarkable power of
Mr. Storrs as a lawyer was brought into conspicuous
prominence was the Sullivan case. The case was tried twice. In
the first trial the late Mr. W. W. O'Brien was the leading counsel
for the defence. In the second trial Mr. Storrs was substi
tuted for Mr. O'Brien. It is not intended in this notice to dis
parage the ability of Mr. O'Brien, in the slightest degree. Mr.
O'Brien was a great lawyer and a bold, courageous, loyal man ;
but his manner was quite the opposite of that of Mr. Storrs.
Mr. O'Brien was demonstrative, belligerent. Mr. Storrs was keen,
alert, dignified, quiet. He was thorough as to the most minor
detail of fact and the method of presenting every statement.
Everything, in his judgment, that had any place in a case was
entitled to an important place. Every statement that had to be
made, no matter how trivial it was, he believed in making with
precision of style and so clearly that all could understand it.
When he entered into the trial of the Sullivan case he found
it enveloped in prejudice. The public had not been permitted
to get the facts in an orderly manner. A more disgraceful dis
play of partisan clamor and religious bigotry has not been seen
in this country. Never was a case more grossly misrepresented
nor more uniformly misunderstood.
The defendant, Alexander Sullivan, was indicted for murder by
the Grand Jury of Cook County, Illinois ; on the 7th of August,
1876, he shot Francis Hanford who died on the same day.
548
THE TRIAL OF ALEXANDER SULLIVAN. 549
Hanford, at the time of his death, was principal of one of the
divisions of the high school in Chicago. He had been assistant
superintendent of schools for the city, but resigned from that
position to take effect August 31, 1875, and on September 14,
1875, Duane Doty, formerly superintendent of schools in Detroit,
Michigan, was appointed assistant superintendent of schools in
Chicago and Hanford on July 14, 1875, was appointed principal
of the North Division high school. Hanford, it appears, desired
to be reinstated in the position of assistant superintendent and
thought the place would be given to him if it were not for
Doty's selection. Mr. Sullivan, at the time of Doty's election
and for some years prior thereto, was secretary of the Board of
Public Works, and he and his wife were formerly residents of
Detroit, where Mrs. Sullivan had been a teacher in the public
schools while Doty was superintendent.
Hanford seems to have become infatuated with the idea that
it was through the influence of the Sullivans that Doty was
brought from their old home, Detroit. He professed to believe
that the bringing of Doty to Chicago was part of a conspiracy
to secure control of Chicago public schools in the interest of the
Catholic church; and in this belief, or, in professing it, a number
of citizens, who ought to have known better, made the case the
text of a religious war. In this bigoted spirit a number of
clergymen preached " sermons" telling the court and the jury, in
advance of the hearing of the evidence, how the case ought to be
decided. Hanford was at once made a harmless, inoffensive, law-
abiding, saintly man; Sullivan became a devil, and some of the
clergymen demonstrated to their own satisfaction that Sullivan
was inspired to shoot Hanford by the Pope at Rome, in order
to secure Duane Doty's appointment at the head of the Chicago
schools for the benefit of the Catholic church. The facts as
gathered from a careful analyzation of the case are these:
On the day of the tragedy, Mr. Sullivan was informed by Mr.
Thomas Brenan, then assistant city treasurer and, at date of this
review, assistant county treasurer of Cook County, Illinois, that
an infamous attack had been made on his wife at the meeting
of the common council of the City of Chicago. He inquired
how the common council could get his wife's name before it and
was informed that the subject came up in reference to the nomi-
55O LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
nation of certain persons to serve as members of the Board of
Education. During the debate concerning the nominees it became
known that Alderman Van Osdel, chairman of the committee of
education, had a communication assailing the nominees. When
the existence of the letter was discovered its production was
demanded. Van Osdel finally produced it and it was read.
During the reading, the President of the council, a leading whole
sale merchant and subsequently member of Congress', Hon.
William Aldrich, interrupted the clerk and declared it a document
unfit to be read; but the curiosity of the Aldermen was aroused
and the entire letter was read. It was anonymous and Van
Osdel refused to give the name of its author to the council.
Mr. Sullivan reached the council chamber before that body had
adjourned and found it and the large audience of spectators in a
state of intense excitement. He went to the clerk's desk and
copied a portion of the letter; then he demanded of Alderman Van
Osdel the name of the author. Van Osdel refused several times
to give the name, but finally, upon Mr. Sullivan's saying to him
that unless he did he would assume that Van Osdel was its
author and would so treat him, said: "It was written by Mr.
Hanford." "Who is Mr. Hanford?" inquired Mr. Sullivan.
"Why, don't you know him?" exclaimed Van Osdel, in surprise.
"I do not," said Mr. Sullivan, "Who is he?" "Why he was
assistant superintendent of Schools."
Mr. Sullivan thus learned who \vas the author of the letter. He
did not know the man and. had no recollection of ever having
heard of his name. He went to his home and the testimony
shows that he inquired of his wife if she knew Hanford or any
of his family. He was answered in the negative and then in
formed his wife and his brother of the attack, but consoled his
wife and himself with the belief that it was all a mistake ; that
as neither of them knew Hanford or his family ; as there could
be no cause for ill will on Hanford's part ; and, as the charges
in the anonymous letter were utterly unfounded, Mrs. Sullivan's
name must have, been used by mistake in the infamous docu
ment. He, therefore, assumed that when Hanford was shown
his mistake, he would retract his false statements and give a
note to be shown to the city editors of the daily papers which
would prevent the publication of the letter. Mrs. Sullivan was
THE TRIAL OF ALEXANDER SULLIVAN. 551
in poor health — having shortly prior to that time been injured in
a street car collision. Mr. Sullivan suggested that his wife and
brother should go down to see the city editors of two of the
papers to which she had been a contributor, lest the letter should
get into early editions of these papers before he could arrive
with Hanford's letter. He then started to ascertain from a city
directory where Hanford resided. To his surprise, he discovered
that Hanford's residence was on the same street as his own into
which he had removed shortly prior to that date, and that it
was within four blocks of his own house. Coming out of the
livery stable, where he had found the directory, he met the car
riage with his wife and brother : he stopped the vehicle and sug
gested to his wife and brother that since Hanford's residence was
so near it would be as well for all to drive there. He would go
in and secure the note ; then all could drive down town together.
He entered the carriage and it was driven to Hanford's residence.
Arriving there, Mr. Sullivan and his brother stepped out of the
carriage leaving his wife in it. He passed two men, one of
whom had a hose in his hand sprinkling a grass plat, ascended
the house steps, and enquired for Mr. Hanford. The lady, who
proved to be Mrs. Hanford, pointed out Mr. Hanford who was
one of the two men Mr. Sullivan had passed. Mr. Sullivan
stepped down to the street and was met by Hanford. No one
heard the conversation between the deceased and Sullivan except
the latter and his brother. They both testified that, in response
to Mr. Sullivan's query of Hanford .as to whether or not he was
the author of the letter, Hanford refused to say ; that, when
pressed, he said, " I will neither deny nor admit ; " and that,
finally, when Sullivan said he was informed by Alderman Van Osdel
that he was the author, Hanford replied : " Well if you know,
you know." Then, Sullivan produced the paper containing the
extracts he had made from the anonymous letter and read it to
Hanford. Mrs. Hanford testified that she saw Mr. Sullivan
" holding a paper in his hand." She also testified : " I only heard
Mr. Sullivan speak his wife's name. I heard him say, 'Mrs. Sul
livan.' Those were the only words I heard." Mr. Sullivan and
his brother both testify that he told Hanford that the letter, in
so far as it referred to Mrs. Sullivan, was untruthful ; that he
specially referred to the statement that Mrs. Sullivan's influence
552 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
with Cohan was so great that she had secured her husband's
appointment ; told Hanford it was false, that he was not married
when appointed ; that his wife did not then know Colvin ; that
the language concerning Mrs. Sullivan had " an infamous impli
cation;" that he came to get from him a letter retracting the
charges so that he could take it to the newspapers ancl secure
the suppression of the letter; that unless Hanford gave such a
letter the charges would be spread before the world in the morn
ing papers; that Hanford refused; that Sullivan asked what he
(Hanford) would think of Sullivan if he had made false accusa
tions against him, much less his wife, and refused to aid in their
suppression; that Hanford still refused; that Sullivan said: "Then
you are a dirty dog." Thereupon the men came to blows.
There is a dispute in the testimony as to who struck first.
McMullen did not see, but says that when he turned from the
carriage Hanford was on the ground and Sullivan was on top
of him. Mrs. Hanford says Sullivan struck first, and knocked
her husband down. The two Sullivans testified that when Han
ford was called a dirty dog he raised his hands to strike; and
his hands and Sullivan's were raised almost simultaneously; that
the men fell, Sullivan being on top, on the wet plat. From this
point there is substantially no disagreement as to the facts..
Indeed, so favorable to the defense was the testimony of
David McMullen, who from that point became one of the lead
ing parties in the quarrel and who was a friend of Hanford and
an enemy of Sullivan, that McMullen's cross examination in the
second trial was limited to his age and weight. He swore he was
thirty years old, weighed "about 175 to 180 pounds," and was
in perfect health. His statement as to his own conduct was cor
roborated by all who saw it. He swore that when the two men
were down he seized Sullivan, and continued as follows: "I put
my right arm around Mr. Sullivan's neck and caught him this way
[indicating] with my arm and took hold of his left hand with
my left hand and jerked him away. Mr. Sullivan resisted some
what — struggled. He didn't offer to strike me. He simply strug
gled to get away. I had hold of him and just kind of threw
him around that way [indicating]." In cross-examination at
the first trial, McMullen said, " Yes, the more he [Sullivan] tried
to get away the tighter I choked him." While Sullivan was
THE TRIAL OF ALEXANDER SULLIVAN. 553
thus held by McMullen, who swore that he never saw Sullivan
before and they did not know each other, Hanford arose. Mr.
G. B. Dunham, a ship chandler, a neighbor of Hanford and
friend of McMullen, swore that he had his child in a baby car
riage on the street, saw the quarrel, put the child safely some
distance away and coming over asked: "What does this mean?"
At the same time he took hold of Hanford's left hand. Hanford
was knocked down. " He got up very quickly and I took hold
of his arm again and he made a pass then with his right hand.
He struck some one. Whom he struck I did not see. The
report of the blow I heard like that, [indicating by striking the
palm of his left hand with his clenched right hand] as it was
made by striking some one's flesh." After that he describes
Hanford as being "with his hand raised and his fist clenched
apparently poising himself for another blow." The testimony of
all the witnesses agrees that it could not have been Mr. Sullivan
who was struck. McMullen standing behind him was holding
him by the neck and left hand and they were about six feet
away from Hanford. He was not struck. Mrs. Sullivan, in her
statement before the coroner's jury, stated that she was struck
in the face by Hanford, having got out of the carriage as soon as
she saw there was a quarrel, for the purpose of stopping it,
exclaiming to her husband: "Do not hurt him, Aleck. Do
not get into a street quarrel." Mrs. Sullivan was offered as a
witness by the defence, but the prosecution objected and, under
the rules, the Court refused to permit her to testify. Flor
ence Sullivan swore that Hanford struck Mrs. .Sullivan.
Rudolph Rissmann, a German, who was passing by with his
wife and his neice, testified that he saw a man strike a lady
and exclaimed to his wife: "My God, they are striking a
lady!" He ran to the scene falling over a fire hydrant on
the road. Before he could arise he heard the shot. When
he arrived he saw that Mrs. Sullivan [whom he identified
before the coroner's jury] was the person who had been
struck and that it was Hanford who had struck her. He
helped to carry Hanford into his house. None of the parties
knew him. He was directed by the coroner to appear at the
inquest. George Auer, 72 Goethe Street, Chicago, private
watchman of the block on which the tragedy occurred, testi-
554
LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
fied that Rissmann helped him and others to carry Hanford
in. Mrs. Mary Rissmann testified that her husband exclaimed
that some one was striking a lady; that she saw the clenched
fist falling, but could not see, because some of tlie group
obstructed her vision, upon whom the blow fell. Her husband
ran to the place and on the road fell over a hydrant. Miss
Lillie Marks swore that she was with the Rissmanns, her
relatives; that from where she stood she could not see the
striking; but she saw Rissmann run and fall over the hydrant.
Dr. W. C. Hunt, testified that he was called to see Mrs.
Sullivan, on the night of the tragedy and found a bruise on
her face and that the discoloration following it lasted several
days. Mr. and Mrs. Fernando Jones, Mrs. Redmond Prindi-
ville, Mrs. Henry Green, Miss Minerva Green and others tes
tified, that they saw Mrs. Sullivan at various times from
within an hour of the tragedy until four or five days there
after and that her face bore the marks of a blow. Those
who saw her the first night described the mark as red and
swollen; those who saw her later described it as being discolored,
as a bruise following a blow naturally would be.
In the instructions to the jury prepared by the State in the
second trial, it was conceded that Hanford had struck Mrs. Sulli
van, but the State's Attorney said Hanford might have been
dazed, and might have struck her unintentionally. Mr. Dunham's
testimony does not bear out the accidental theory, but if it were
accidental, the impression on Sullivan's mind would be the same.
He was held and choked by a man 'much taller than himself,
who weighed nearly forty pounds more than he then did, whom
he never saw before, and whom he found with Hanford. His sick
wife, the victim of Hanford's anonymous slander, exclaimed that
he had struck her. At this time McMullen testifies that Han
ford "turned around and came towards us — Mr. Sullivan and
myself. He was reaching towards us. He got loose and came
around like this [indicating]; Mr. Sullivan and myself stood here
[indicating.] I had my arm still around his [Sullivan's] neck and
had hold of him with my left hand; and just as Mr. Hanford
came up I sort of threw Sullivan around behind me; put my
left hand up to keep them apart, and just as I did that the pis
tol shot was fired." If McMullen saw that it was necessary to
THE TRIAL OF ALEXANDER SULLIVAN. 555
"keep them apart," who was the aggressor? Sullivan was held
by McMullen, who was so much larger and stronger than Sulli
van, that he was able, as he swears, to 'jerk' and 'throw' him
around. Sullivan's position compelled the termination of the
struggle so far as he was concerned. Hanford 'came up' and,
'to keep them apart,' swears McMullen, 'I put up my hand.'
Mr. Sullivan testified that he was held, precisely as McMullen
admits; that McMullen was bending him back and choking him;
that he heard his wife exclaim that she was struck and that
Hanford was coming towards him with upraised hand. He was
helpless to protect himself in any other way and, for the first
time, thought of his revolver, and, with his right hand,
which was loose, he drew it. His testimony is that he was
so held that he could not and did not take aim and that he
had no distinct recollection of even cocking it. He insisted,
however, that McMullen still held his left hand and was choking
him with his right arm. The manner in which he was jerked
and thrown around by McMullen makes it extremely difficult
for either to be absolutely accurate as to the second when Sulli
van's left hand was released. McMullen says 'the pistol was
fired,' 'just as I did that' — let go of the left hand — and sort of
threw him (Sullivan) behind me. It was the act of a second or
less. Whether it was "just as" McMullen let go of the left hand or
just after is not very material, as all agree that McMullen
continued to hold Sullivan by the neck with his right hand.
Sullivan, as the testimony shows, at first intended to go to
Hanford alone. It was* only on discovering the nearness of
Hanford's residence to his own that he decided 'that he might
as well ride there with his wife and brother in the carriage
which they had procured to take them to the newspaper
offices. Had he intended to quarrel, he would not have taken
a sick wife with him. Had he intended to shoot Hanford, he
could have done it when McMullen stood about ten feet away
from them with his back towards them. But why had he a
revolver? Sullivan's testimony and his brother's showed that
he had carried the revolver since he lived in New Mexico and
continued the habit after coming to Chicago, where he was for
a time engaged as a reporter on a morning paper. R. Par
ish, James A. Gates and Frank Bronson testified that they
556 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
had frequently seen the revolver on his person. Dennis K.
Sullivan (no relative of Alexander) testified that he was a
detective on the police force of Detroit, Mich., about
twenty-four years, and that he had presented the revolver to
Alexander Sullivan twelve or thirteen years before the tragedy.
The following instruction was given on this subject.
"The jury are instructed that if they believe from the evidence, that
Sullivan had a pistol upon his person at the time of the homicide, and it
was contrary to law to carry such pistol, that only rendered Sullivan amen
able to the penalty prescribed by the statute for carrying it, and if the jury
believe he was in the habit of carrying a pistol, then no inference of mal
ice or an intention to kill in this particular case can be drawn from the
fact that at the time of the homicide he had the pistol upon his person."
Extracts from the anonymous letter mentioned and introduced
were as follows:
"The rule and ruin party in the old council had its representative ring
in the bd. Edn." . . . "That this ring has plotted and legislated to cripple
the schools and to use the position to further private and sectarian [some
word intended by the writer to be inserted here was apparently omitted] is
a matter of history." . . . "The instigator and engineer-in-chief of all devil
try connected with the legislation of the Board is Mrs. Sullivan, wife of the
Sec. of Board Pub. Works. Her influence with Colvin was proven by her
getting Bailey dismissed and her husband appointed his successor." . .
"T. J. Bluthardt has shared in the infamous work of this ring, his motive
undoubtedly being to aggrandize himself politically." .... "At one time he
planned to elect a male Supt. German, but was warned to desist by Mrs.
Sullivan and he desisted." . . . "Bluthardt by his voting with this ring in
their worst schemes, by his boasting of his readiness to debauch any woman
who would yield to him, and by his general history as a demagogue, has
proved himself entirely unworthy to hold any* office of honor or trust, cer
tainly for an office which involves more than ever need to be surrounded
with purity and wisdom." . . . "Pitiable spectacle that a city of half a mil
lion people cannot find enough wise, prudent, hottest, pure men who need
not deliberate in a closet, or with one particular woman, to determine what
they shall do or not do!"
In a private note to Van Osdel, accompanying the anonymous
document, Hanford wrote: "I have used the word Catholic' freely
because the facts demand it — but it would be unwise to do so
in canvassing this matter in Committee or council because the
howl of persecution would be heard instantly. Great caution
will be necessary to conceal your sources of information if there
is much of a struggle."
In his testimony Mr. Sullivan made an explanation concerning
THE TRIAL OF ALEXANDER SULLIVAN. 557
that portion of the anonymous letter which falsely alleges that
he was appointed to office through his wife's influence with
Mayor Colvin. The publishers think it should be given for the
information of our readers outside of Chicago. He said his rea
son for saying to Hanford that the language of that false state
ment had "an infamous implication," was based on the attacks
which had been made in the public press concerning Mayor
Colvin. The newspapers had attacked Mr. Colvin severely and
the Chicago Times had published articles assailing his private
character. One of these articles was entitled, "Our Bummer
Mayor." The Times was then demanding that the city authori
ties close certain vile saloons, which were called concert halls and
in which indecent theatrical exhibitions were given by lewd
women ; it charged that Colvin visited these places himself, went
behind the scenes, drank with the unfortunate women and took
them on his knees. He testified that whether the charges were
true or false as to Mayor Colvin, they had been published in an
influential, widely-circulated journal; and that he believed the
writer of the anonymous letter, who must have had knowledge
of these public charges, intended to convey "an infamous impli
cation," as he had said to Hanford, when he read the extract to
him and told him how false and infamous it \vas. With this fact
in mind and the language concerning Bluthardt and Hanford's
repetition of the word "purity," there can be no doubt about the
impression made on Mr. Sullivan as to the opinion he desired to
convey concerning Mrs. Sullivan. If he desired to make some pro
per, honorable exposure of wrong, why did he write anonymously?
Why did he write to Van Osdel that "great caution will be neces
sary to conceal your sources of information if there is much of a
struggle?" "This case," said Mr. Storrs, when it was submitted
to him, "is not the case the public have heard about. I have
been told by every one that Hanford was a peaceable, law-abiding
man. I heard Sullivan described as a big, coarse, Irish brute.
The public believe that Sullivan hunted out a quiet, peaceable
man and began a quarrel. The truth when ascertained shows
that Hanford wras a criminal ; that he was the slanderer of his
neighbor's wife; and that he hid himself behind the veil and the
supposed protection of an anonymous letter when issuing his vile
accusations. It shows that Hanford was given an opportunity,
558 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
I
not to make complete reparation for his crime — because he
could not do that — but to prevent the publication of his
attack and that he refused to do so; it shows that the creat
ure who was capable of assailing a woman's character was
able to strike her a brutal blow while her husband was being
held by his friend ; it shows that in place of being the puny,
helpless man he has been described he had the strength to
break away from the grasp of his neighbor, Mr. Dunham, who
played the part of a gentleman and a peace-maker ; it shows
that after striking the victim of his anonymous slander, he was
rushing angrily at her pinioned and choked husband ; it shows
that Sullivan with most wonderful moderation and self-control,
approached Hanford's house in so calm a manner and spoke
so courteously to Mrs. Hanford that — notwithstanding the keen
instinct of a wife to detect trouble — she had no idea that any
trouble was threatened or that his visit was an unfriendly one;
it shows that Mrs. Hanford on her oath, admits that Sullivan
conducted his conversation with her husband in a tone so far
removed from noise or anger, so void of threatening gesture,
that she, although within ten feet of them, except once when
she heard the words ' Mrs. Sullivan,' never caught a word
understandingly ; it shows that Sullivan was a gentleman by
instinct and education; that he never drank a glass of liquor
in his life; that, in place of being a bigot, he was a broad-
minded man; that, beginning work for himself at the age of
twelve, he became a competent journalist ; was declared by the
Board of Public Works to be the best secretary it ever had;
that he was a man who had the courage of his convictions
and was one who, when too young to vote himself, was an
abolitionist and took the stump in Michigan in favor of a con
stitutional amendment giving the negroes the right of suffrage.
It shows that those who had known him from boyhood flocked
to Chicago, at their own expense, to bear testimony to his
good character." These witnesses included the venerable Detroit
merchant whose store Sulliv»an entered when a lad of twelve,
and the banker, the merchant, the business men, the profes
sional men of Chicago. In place of being considered a bigot,
it appears that his four bondsmen, representing not only great
wealth but commercial honor and social character, were all
THE TRIAL OF ALEXANDER SULLIVAN. 559
protestants. One was Commissioner Louis Wahl of the Board
of Public Works, who had been associated with Mr. Sullivan
daily for nearly three years. Mr. Wahl is a leading Chicago
manufacturer. The late venerable Doctor Dyer, whose name
will always be remembered in history in connection with the
underground railway established to aid colored slaves in escaping
from bondage in the South to freedom in Canada, was another.
Fernando Jones, one of Chicago's oldest settlers and most
reputable citizens, was the third; and the late George Taylor,
the banker, was the fourth. "What a bigot," said Mr. Storrs,
"Sullivan must have been to make such friends!" Mrs. Sullivan
was charged with being an enemy of the public schools of
Detroit. She graduated from the high school in that city;
enjoyed the highest distinction in it. She afterwards tanght in
the Detroit public schools. Since the trial Mrs. Sullivan has
continued to receive the most notable compliments from the
Alumni of the Detroit High School, having several times been
given the place of honor in their anniversary celebrations and
other public exercises. The facts show that Mr. Sullivan did
not aid in securing Doty's election; they also show that the
only correspondence that passed between them was one letter
from Doty to Sullivan asking his opinion and informing him
that some friends in Chicago urged him to come, and one
letter in reply from Sullivan to Doty in which he urged Doty
not to come because of the insecurity of tenure of the office
and because he predicted that all official salaries must neces
sarily be reduced, owing to the City's financial embarrassments.
(The City was then paying its debts with scrip, the legality of
which was questioned, and, within six months, the prediction
was verified and all City salaries were reduced about twenty-
five per cent.) The facts show that Duane Doty, who was
called a catholic, is not and never was a catholic. On the
contrary he was reared and educated a protestant by his pro-
testant parents and for some years has been an avowed believer
in what may be called Mr. Robert Ingersoll's church. If Doty
could aid any pope it would be "Pope Bob," as the friends of
that orator affectionately call him, and not the Pope of Rome.
The testimony shows that although Alexander Sullivan was
secretary of the Board of Public Works for nearly three years
560 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
prior to the Hanford tragedy and, therefore, could easily have
become acquainted with the members of the Board of Educa
tion, the following gentlemen swore that they did not even
know him: John P. Olinger, David A. Coan, Theo. J. Blut-
hardt, Adolph Schoeninger, Thomas Wilce, D. S. Covert, Perry
H. Smith, C. J. Hambleton. There were only fifteen members
in the Board. The following members of the Board of Educa
tion swore that they never even knew, or were spoken to, or
written to by Mrs. Sullivan concerning school government1
appointment, or any other subject: Perry H. Smith, John P.
Olinger, David A. Coan, Theo. J. Bluthardt, Adolph Schoen
inger, Thomas Wilce, D. S. Covert, George C. Clarke, C. J.
Hambleton, Ingwell Oleson.
The memorandum used in argument of the evidence, reads:
" It will be observed that this list includes Doctor Bluthardt concerning
whom Hanford wrote the following :
" 'T. J. Bluthardt has shared in the infamous work of this ring, his motive
undoubtedly being to aggrandize himself politically." . . " At one time he
planned to elect a male Supt. German, but was warned to desist by Mrs.
Sullivan and he desisted." . . . "Bluthardt, by his voting with this ring in
their worst schemes, by his boas.ting of his readiness to debauch any woman
who would yield to him, and by his general history as a demagogue, has
proved himself entirely unworthy to hold any office of honor or trust, cer
tainly for an office which involves more than ever need to be surrounded
with purity and wisdom.'
"Mr. Geo. C. Clarke swore that though he had known Mr. Sullivan, who
had compiled statistics at his request for circulation among insurance com
panies, showing Chicago's improved resources for fighting fire, Sullivan
had never spoken to him about school affairs.
"Mr. P. A. Hoyne swore that he knew Sullivan, and on one occasion
met Mrs. Sullivan with her husband, but that neither of them had ever
spoken to him about school affairs.
" Ingwell Oleson swore that he was once introduced to Mr. Sullivan but
never had any acquaintance with him beyond that and had never been
spoken or written to by him about school business or appointments.
"Mr. W. K. Sullivan, a member and President of the Board [a promi
nent journalist, no relation of defendant and a protestant] swore that he
had known Mr. and Mrs. Sullivan about five years, but had never heard
either of them say a word concerning school affairs, and had never
received a letter from either on any subject directly or indirectly relating
to schools.
"Mr. John C. Richberg, a member and Ex-President of the Board,
swore that he knew Mr. and Mrs. Sullivan ; that Mr. Sullivan never spoke
or wrote to him about school affairs ; that Mrs. Sullivan had once spoken
THE TRIAL OF ALEXANDER SULLIVAN. 561
to him about the gross injustice of reducing the salaries of the lowest sala
ried lady teachers twenty-five per cent. They were not paid as well as
servant girls she said. [Their salaries were £450.] She urged that in order
to comply with the council's direction to reduce expenses 25 per cent., the
Board of Education should make a greater reduction on the salaries of
those holding the better paid positions and less than 25 per cent., or, if
possible, no reduction on those getting only £450 per annum.
"James Goggin, an ex-member and attorney of the Board, swore that he
knew Mr. and Mrs. Sullivan very well: that Mr. Sullivan never to his
knowledge interested himself in school affairs: that Mrs. Sullivan had never
made a request of him but once, that was a request to secure an appoint
ment as teacher for a girl and that he was unable to comply with that
request.
"\V. J. English, a member of the Board, swore that he knew Mr. and
Mrs. Sullivan ; that neither of them ever attempted to his knowledge to
influence the affairs of the school Board in any manner on any subject.
"Mayor Colvin swore that he never saw Mrs. Sullivan but twice in his
life. On both of these occasions she was with her husband. Neither Mr.
or Mrs. Sullivan ever made a request of him concerning the public schools
or school affairs or any subject pertaining to the Board of Education. He
never spoke to Mrs. Sullivan, except on these two occasions or communi
cated with her or received any communication from her on any subject
whatever. Mr. Sullivan was secretary of the Board of Public Works and
had official relations with him constantly but never made a request of him
concerning the Board of Education or sch'ool affairs."
Speaking of the relative sizes of the two men — Sullivan and
Hanford, Mr. Storrs called attention to the fact that the differ
ence was nothing like what the public had been led to believe.
Hanford was described as a puny, sickly man, Sullivan as a
giant. At the time of the tragedy Sullivan weighed 140 pounds.
He had not been away from his duties as secretary of the
Board of Public Works for a day during the entire preceding
year. He was one of the busiest men in the city departments
and was at work as usual, without having an hour's vacation
during the hot summer. The testimony of Mrs. Hanford was
that her husband weighed "from 125 to 135 pounds according
to the season of the year; in the Winter he weighed 135."
" But," added Mr. Storrs, "The struggle which ended in the
tragedy, was not between Sullivan and a man weighing a little
less than he did. It was between Sullivan, on the one side, and
one man [Hanford] and another man [McMullen], who weighed
1/5 to 1 80 pounds according to his own testimony, and who
swore he was able to 4jerk' Sullivan around as he pleased."
36
562 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
Shepard Johnson, secretary of the Board of Education, testified
that during the year preceding the tragedy Hanford had not lost
a day because of sickness. He said that under the rules of
the Board he [Hanford] made his own returns of his attendance
in a report to the witness ; that Hanford would have been com
pelled to report any absence for sickness or any other cause
which amounted to as much as a half a day ; that there was
no such report, and no loss of time whatever by Hanford
during the entire year. While Hanford's cowardice and moral
turpitude were commented on by other counsel, it was Mr.
Storrs who insisted that he must be pronounced a criminal
under the laws of the State of Illinois, and so he was. "It
must," said Storrs, " go on the judicial records of this State
that Francis Hanford was not an innocent man; that he was
a criminal when he was shot; and that he was guilty of a
most cowardly and detestable crime."
The following instruction written by Mr. Storrs — in Illinois
the Courts are obliged to instruct the jury in writing and are
not permitted to deliver oral charges as in some other States
—was given by the Court, without the change of a letter:
"If the jury believe from the evidence that Hanford wrote the article
offered in evidence in this case, in which he made a false and malicious
attack upon the character of Mrs. Sullivan, and afterwards struck Mrs.
Sullivan, the jury have the right to consider the feelings of malice which
actuated Hanford, and Sullivan had a right to consider them in estimating
the degree of danger in which either he or his wife was placed.
"If the jury believe from the evidence in this case, that the charges and
statements in the article read in evidence in this case, so far as the same
relate to Mrs. Sullivan, were false, then the law presumes them to have
been malicious. The jury are further instructed that in the absence of
any proof showing, or tending to show the truth of the charges, they are
bound to find them both false and malicious. It was the privilege of the
prosecution, as tending to show the absence of malice in the author of
that article, to introduce proof that it was based upon information which
he had received from others and in the absence of such proof the jury are
bound to find, as a matter of fact, that those charges were manufactured,
and were made in the absence of any proof whatsoever, or of any infor
mation upon which to base them. The publication of such charges by
sending them to other parties to be read, or by printing them in the news
papers, is by the laws of this state a criminal offense : and if the jury
believe, from the evidence in this case, that Hanford was the author of
that article, and he sent it to Van Osdel for the purpose of having it made
public, then Hanford was guilty of an offence made criminal by the laws
THE TRIAL OF ALEXANDER SULLIVAN. 563
of this State. It was the clear legal right and it was the duty of Sullivan
to defend his wife against those charges: it was his right and it was his
duty to, if possible, suppress their publication and to demand from their
author an explanation or a retraction ; and if the jury believe from all the
evidence in this case, that Sullivan, his wife and brother visited Hanford
for the purpose of convincing him that he was mistaken as to those char
ges, and of procuring from him such a retraction as would secure the sup
pression of their publication in the daily papers, then the jury are instructed
that such purpose was not only lawful, but it was the performance of a
duty which Sullivan owed to his wife.
"The jury are further instructed, if they believe, from the evidence in
this case, that, upon visiting Hanford, Sullivan called his attention to a por
tion of the objectionable article referred to, read it to Hanford, requested a
retraction or such an explanation as would secure its suppression, it was
the duty of Hanford to make the retraction, and to assist in the suppression
of the publication of the article. If the jury believe that, after being
advised of the facts, Hanford still persisted in asserting the truth of those
charges, refused to give any retraction, or to make any explanation con
cerning them, after Sullivan had called his attention to an alleged infamous
implication against his wife, contained in the portion of the article read to
Hanford, then such refusal of Hanford' s was a reiteration of the charge,
and was an admission that the article was susceptible of the infamous impli
cation attached to it by Sullivan."
On the night of Mr. Sullivan's acquittal, the jury sent word by
the bailiff in charge that they had agreed — of course, no message
was sent as to what was the verdict while waiting for the Judge, who
had gone to his home and had to be sent for. The Times' report
of this anxious interval shows how clearly Mr. Storrs divined the
result, and what was his opinion of the letter ; said the Times :
" Every ear was strained for the sound of the Judge's carriage, and at
last there came a rumble and a banging of doors, which caused a general
turning of heads. It was not the Judge, but Emery A. Storrs, the hero of
the trial, whose reading powers, as exhibited in the reading of Hanford's
letter during the afternoon, excel those of any professor of elocution in this
city or elsewhere. Mr. Storrs although entirely unacquainted with the
result of the agreement, came up smiling and chaffed away with that happy
mixture of wit and sarcasm in which he has hardly an equal. 'The man's
acquitted,' he said confidently. 'No jury of decent men would confine
him for a day after hearing that infamous letter.'"
After another half hour, the judge arrived and the jury
verified the brilliant counsellor's prediction. They returned a ver
dict of not guilty and it soon became known that this verdict
was reached on the first ballot.
564 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
The defendant, Alexander Sullivan, immediately after his
acquittal continued the study of the law — he was preparing for
admission to the bar when the tragedy occured. He was admit
ted in 1878. He has been for nearly seven years a member of
the law firm of Windes & Sullivan, Chicago. His partner is a
Master in Chancery of the Circuit Court of Cook County. Mr.
Sullivan was unanimously elected and re-elected President of the
Irish-American Council of Chicago, a body composed of dele
gates from the forty-five patriotic and benevolent societies of
that city. He made the arrangements for the trip of the Irish leader,
Mr. Parnell, through the Western States, when Mr. Parnell visited
this country in company with the Hon. John Dillon and the Hon.
Timothy Healy, and he accompanied them to several of the leading
cities they visited. In 1883, at Philadelphia, he was elected Presi
dent of the Irish National League of America. He was unani
mously re-elected at Boston in 1884, but declined to serve. He has
spoken in behalf of the League in nearly all the large cities of the
Union. During the last presidential election he was a very active
supporter of Mr. Blaine and made many speeches which attracted
national attention. Notable among these wereohis speeches at the
Academy of Music in New York and his speech in Toledo, Ohio.
Mrs. Sullivan, the wife, wields one of the most trenchant
pens in the land, and was for years a brilliant Chicago
journalist, acting for the daily journals both as an editorial
writer and as literary critic; she has also contributed to the
magazines and is the author of many special articles in the
American reprint of the Encyclopaedia Brittanica.
The other legal participants in this famous trial, included, as
has been stated, Mr. W. W. O'Brien, who was well known
throughout the West, having run once for congressman-at-large,
for Illinois, in opposition to John A. Logan. Mr. O'Brien
departed this life in 1885. Charles H. Reid, one of the State's
attorneys at the first trial — when the jury stood eleven for,
acquittal, and one for a conviction with a light sentence (in
Illinois the jury fix the sentence and could have made it as
short as one year), is a practicing lawyer in New York
City; he was counsel for Guiteau, the assasin of President
Garfield; he declared, after the Sullivan trial that he would
like to run for judge, against the Hon. W. K. McAllister,
THE TRIAL OF ALEXANDER SULLIVAN. 565
who presided at the trial, and against whom there was some
clamor at the time. Mr. Reid's desire was gratified, he was
nominated, and in June, 1879, when the votes were counted,
it \vas found that Judge McAllister's majority over Mr. Reid
exceeded eleven thousand votes. In 1885, Judge McAllister
was re-elected without opposition, and for nearly six years has
served as Judge of the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois.
The Appellate Court judges in Illinois being elected by the
Supreme Court from the Judges elected by the people to the
Circuit bench. Mr. Thomas A. Moran, who was one of Mr.
Sullivan's counsel, was elected a judge of the Circuit Court
oi Cook County, Illinois, in 1879; was re-elected in 1885,
without opposition; is now an associate of Judge McAllister,
in the First District of the Appellate Court of Illinois, having
been appointed, by the Supreme Court, during the present year.
The Hon. Luthin Laflin Mills, who was State's Attorney at
the second trial, is now practicing at the Chicago Bar, rank
ing as one of the most brilliant of his profession. The Hon.
Leonard Swett, who made one of the greatest speeches of his
life in opening the case, on behalf of the defendant, is one
of the leaders of the Chicago bar, and was formerly a partner
of Abraham Lincoln, at Springfield. Colonel John Van Arman,
has practically retired from practice at the bar, but ranks high
for great ability and experience.
Such was the history of and such were some of the lead
ing participators in the Sullivan trial.
CHAPTER XXVIII.
THE GREAT ANN ARBOR CASE.
HISTORY OF THE DOUGLAS-ROSE TROUBLE — A PLOT AGAINST AN OLD SOL
DIER — DIVIDES FIRST A SCHOOL, THEN A STATE — THE TRIAL IN THE
COURTS — MR. STORRS* GREAT ARGUMENT — A SCIENTIFIC FRAUD — THE
RESULT.
THERE was introduced into the House of Representatives of
the State of Michigan, January 12, 1877, and concurred
in by the Senate, one week later, the following preamble and
resolutions :
" Whereas, A defalcation, extending for a long period of years, and em
bracing quite a large sum of money, has been discovered in the manage
ment of the chemical laboratory of the State University ;
"And whereas, The Regents of the University in their " statement of certain
needs of the University of Michigan," which they have published and
placed in the hands of the members of the Legislature, have invited, and
generously offered every facility for the most thorough and exhaustive in
vestigation, either of the defalcation itself, or of their mode of treating it;
therefore,
"Resolved, (the Senate concurring), That the committees on the Univer
sity of the Senate and House of Representatives be and they are hereby
instructed, jointly to make a thorough and exhaustive investigation of said
defalcation and of any and every subject-matter connected therewith, which
in their judgment may require investigation, to the end that said commit
tees may report to their respective Houses whether any, and if so what legis
lation is needed, and that said committee sit with open doors ;
"Resolved, That said committees have leave to sit during the sessions of
the Senate and House of Representatives, and be empowered to administer
oaths, compel the attendance of persons and the production of papers, and to
employ a stenographer to take and transcribe the testimony at a compensa
tion not exceeding ten cents per folio;"
The joint committee entered upon the task, and continued in
the prosecution of it for more than two months. The results were
grave and painful.
566
THE GREAT ANN ARBOR CASE. 567
Dr. Silas H. Douglass, had been conspicuously connected
with the University of Michigan, at Ann Arbor, since the year
1844; he was reputed wealthy, and figured well in the chief
educational circles of the country. The chemical laboratory of
the university was established in 1853, and, not long after, the
professor of chemistry came to be recognized as its director.
To this officer was committed, either tacitly or by action of
the Regents, its entire management subject only to a very slight
supervision. To him was entrusted a power over its affairs
with which even the Board itself did not seem inclined to in
terfere. Director Douglass bought and sold at pleasure. He
sent to New York, or Europe, as his inclination dictated. He
expended money in traveling, and the bill was never challenged.
He would make a report in June or October, and whether ac
curate or inaccurate, it passed no rigid scrutiny. In some cases,
at least, the reports were neither examined by the Regents or
passed upon at all.
It was to avoid such dangers, doubtless, that the control of
the University was at a very early day placed in the hands of
a Board of Regents which, eventually, was made elective in
1862. Evidently, the intention was to put the government of
what has rapidly developed into a great educational power into
the control of skilled minds biased by no other official relations ;
and, parenthetically it may be added, that the acceptance of such
high trusts has, as a rule, been followed by faithful performance
of every duty, though rendered gratuitously. It must be con
fessed, however, that for years grave irregularities were permitted.
Dr. Douglass undertook important work, involving the expenditure
of thousands of dollars, with no resolutions of the Board authoriz
ing him so to do, allowed himself a certain per cent., and took
his pay out of such funds as he chose, and then included the'
transactions in his annual report, and there it ended. A com
mittee was appointed by the Board to expend a large appro
priation of the Legislature, their plans were made, the work
contracted for, the Director pushed all aside, expended the money,
and exceeded the appropriation thousands of dollars, and the
Board did not even protest. The laboratory was making money,
it was thought, every year, and yet the Director was charging
interest on money which he claimed to have advanced, and the
568 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
Regents quietly paid the ten per cent, interest without inquiring
too closely whether the laboratory was always in funds or not.
The laboratory was always in funds. A surplus was on hand
every year, and yet the Regents allowed during years covered
by this investigating committee the aggregate amount of $926.88
for interest on what was claimed as advances to the laboratory
during these years. The Director employed assistants from time
to time, who were responsible to him alone, except so far as
his pay by the Regents established relations with him. In this
manner was Preston B. Rose employed the third day of April,
1866. The Regents did not employ him by resolution, as their
by-laws required, but after a time they recognized him as assist
ant in the chemical laboratory. The Director, however, in the
meantime, employed him as clerk.
For many years no account book of any kind appears to
have been kept in the laboratory. Previous to 1860 all is
unknown. After that year eacli student desiring instruction in
the chemical laboratory made a deposit of $10, and took a
ticket, on the face of which was his receipt for the deposit.
On settling his account at the close of his term in the labora
tory, the student placed the amount paid for all material used
on the back of the card, signed his name and turned it over
to the Director, to be used as a voucher in his settlement
with the Regents. A ledger was also used in which the
account with the student was kept, and from which he determined
the amount to be entered on the back of his card, which he turned
over to the Director.
In 1866, the system was again changed. Stub-books were
substituted for cards or tickets. These provided a certificate
and a stub for each student. Under this system the student
made his deposit of $10, which was entered with his name
'and the date on the face of the certificate and the stub; the
certificate was torn off, signed by the book-keeper, and
passed over to the student as his receipt for the deposit.
The stub was retained in the book. The student on complet
ing his course settled by the ledger, certified to the amount
paid on the back of his certificate, and turned it over to be
used in the 'same manner as the card vouchers. This was a
full settlement with the student. The assistant or book-keeper
THE GREAT ANN ARBOR CASE. $69
settled with the Director as follows: Once a month or oftener
the Director and assistant would examine the stub-book; the
assistant would turn over the deposit money of each student,
and the Director would mark the stub with his name or one
or more initials, usually only a letter D. The vouchers of
students who had finished their course would then be turned
over to the Director, and under his direction a red line would
be drawn diagonally across the stub corresponding to the cer
tificate. The settlement for the deposit money would always
precede that for the certificate. The final settlement would
require the payment to the Director of the amount on the back
of the certificate, made less by the deposit on its face. This
and other improvements in the system of accounting in the
laboratory were introduced by recommendation of Mr. Rose
soon after entering upon his duties as assistant.
The ledger accounts were also about this time greatly im
proved. Previous to 1864 no cash payments were ever entered
in the ledger. After that, the first deposit was frequently en
tered, but no subsequent payments except in a few instances.
But after Rose assumed charge of the books, the accounts were
entered in full, and on final settlement of the student were
properly balanced. The system was lacking, however, and at
length the Regents took the matter in hand, and, on October
15, 1875, Passed the following resolution:
" Resolved, That the director of the chemical laboratory shall, in future,
present quarterly estimates covering all probable purchases, that all moneys
received for sale of chemicals to students be duly accounted for and paid
quarterly into the treasury ; and further, that duplicate vouchers be pre
sented, as in all other departments, covering all payments, in accordance
with the existing law."
A complete revolution was thus proposed in the system in
vogue in the laboratory. All vouchers were now under the
scrutiny of many persons, and each transaction was reported near
the time of its occurrence. No moneys were left in the hands
of the Director, except for a brief time, and irresponsible pur
chases no longer tolerated. The whole department was subjected
to rigid scrutiny. Only three days from the passing of that res
olution, Dr. Douglas — as he testified — " accidentally found " a
defalcation. He found that no vouchers had been turned over to
him by Rose for students who had finished their course. His
5/0 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
suspicions being aroused, he presented Rose with four names of
delinquent students, and claimed payment. Three of these were
stubless accounts, and one had a corresponding stub signed by
himself with his initial D. and marked with a red line. Protest
ing that he must have paid these accounts, and showing Dr.
Douglas the stub thus signed and marked, Rose weakly paid
then again. Thereupon, Prof. Prescott and President Angell, of
the University faculty, were taken to the private residence of
Douglas, and told that Rose had virtually acknowledged his guilt,
had made out and certified to a list of accounts which had not been
rendered to him. The lists were placed before them to prove it;
the ledger was also produced, showing that the money had all
gone into the hands of Dr. Rose ; and there the showing ended.
Then came the calling together of two of the executive committee
of the Board, who entrusted the whole matter of continuing the
investigation to those who had thus formed an opinion of
Rose's guilt, and who, guided by Dr. Douglas, conducted it
on this theory until a defalcation of thousands of dollars was
traced, as they alleged, to his hands. Acting under instructions
of his attorney, Rose refused any such investigation, but soon
made propositions in almost every possible form for a full and
final investigation, or by suit in the court. These were refused.
The exaction of a payment of over $600, added to other pay
ments amounting to $831.10, besides interest, constitutes another
important feature of these proceedings. Further on, a deed of
all the property Rose possessed was demanded and given at
once. Those who later defended him pronounced him a scoun
drel, and those who formerly honored him turned away. A
few, however, still doubted his guilt, and to them from time to
time he confided what seemed to them proof of innocence.
They commenced a complete review of the whole case. They
appealed to the Regents for a full and final hearing. They ap
pealed in vain. In the meantime the Board of Regents had
pursued the investigation. A committee looked over the work
of the President, Mr. Bennett, Mr. Douglas, and Mr. Knight,
and certified to its correctness in the Gilbert-Walker report,
made December 21, 1875. Against the conclusions of this com
mittee Dr. Rose protested. A second committee was appointed
on December 21, 1875, immediately after a vote had been
THE GREAT ANN ARBOR CASE. 5/1
taken to dismiss Dr. Rose from the University, to " investigate
Dr. Douglas' accounts with the University," who made a report
on the 29th of March, following. It is worthy of remark that
this committee employed accomplished accountants, and made
the most searching investigation ever made by the Regents.
Dr. Douglas was with this committee frequently, — Dr. Rose
never.
The defalcation was shown by this committee to be $3,000
more than the Gilbert-Walker report.
The defalcation not being traced to any party by this
examination, it was left to another committee of Regents, who re
ported June 19, 1876 holding Dr. Rose responsible for $1,174,35.
Rose, and his friends, offered to submit his case to the Board, but it
\vas pushed aside and friends of Douglas suddenly filed a bill in the
Circuit Court in Chancery for the County of Washtenaw, Michigan,
which alleged (i) that from June 28th, 1865, to December 2ist,
1875, "Rose and Douglas were both salaried agents and
employes of the complainants (the Board of Regents), each
having certain duties assigned him in respect to the laboratory,
which he assumed and undertook to perform," and that "Rose
was by a like appointment as Douglas performing certain
duties;" (2) that "Rose, although often requested so to do,
has hitherto neglected and refused to account with the com
plainants (Regents) in respect to the laboratory receipts or any
of the matters hereinbefore mentioned, and although the
defendant Douglas has been at all times ready and willing to
account, and has accounted with respect thereto in so far as
it has been in his power so to do; yet no complete account
has been found practicable without an accounting with the
defendant Rose also;" and also "that the said Rose fraudu
lently omitted to truly credit in the said laboratory ledger,"
etc.; and further, "that he has fraudulently appropriated the
same (certain funds) to his own use;" and (3) that Rose had not
only fraudulently appropriated moneys, but "by fraudulent con
trivances and misrepresentations" had induced Douglas to pay
over and account to the Regents moneys which he has fraudu
lently used. The bill prayed that the Court find what amount
Douglas had accounted for to the Regents, which he had not
secured from defendant Rose, and it further prayed the Court
572 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
to find what sum might be in Douglas' hands to be decreed
an orfset against what the University owed him. The whole
theory of the bill being, of course, that Rose was a rascal
and Douglas an innocent man.
It was at this point, that the legislature of the State began
the investigation of what had gradually spread out its nastiness,
and, on the 2/th of March, 1877, the joint committee sum
marized its report with the conclusions:
"We find in our judgment that the financial affairs of the University were
managed in a very unsystematic manner until recently, and even now need
some improvements.
"We find that the manner in which the business of the chemical laboratory
was conducted was faulty and irregular to a surprising degree.
"Nor can we withhold the opinion that the Board of Regents were dere
lict in the important obligation of carefully watching over its affairs and
guarding it from fraud.
"They allowed expenses to be incurred unreasonably large in many
instances, and expenditures in other instances utterly preposterous and
uncalled for.
"They permitted dictation and control almost beyond belief.
"They allowed interest on money which could never have been advanced
as claimed by the Director, the laboratory having always been in funds.
"Why interest was ever allowed seems a profound mystery.
"They allowed the Director to deceive the students by pretending to sell
chemicals and apparatus to them at New York prices, while an inspection
of the ledger shows an enormous advance on such prices.
"It was assumed that the laboratory was profitable and yielded a large
income to the University without foundation in fact.
"The accounts rendered by the Director are found to be not merely
faulty, but incorrect to the extent of thousands of dollars.
"It is utterly impossible to tell whether the defalcation traced by these
investigations is the only one that has occurred. The tables herewith pre
sented in Exhibits A, B, and C, appended to this report, are highly sug
gestive of others, to say the least.
"Your committee have endeavored to trace the deficit in the chemical
laboratory to the responsible parties, and with the aid of the accountant
Tregaskis, assisted by the work of others, we reach the following: The
defalcation, as determined by the books and papers in this case, is 15,797.17,
to which should be added the accounts of Wells and Grant, of $30.65,
which was paid to Rose and never entered upon the ledger, making
$5,827.82.
"Of this amount #3,349-73 is made up of missing tickets and certificates
having a corresponding stub, with a red line and letter D, certified by Dr.
Douglas to have been paid to him. The remaining part of this defalcation
is $2,478.09. Of thig we are able to trace to our satisfaction $1,998.79 to
THE GREAT ANN ARBOR CASE. 573
the same hands The balance of $479.3° }S traced to the hands of Dr.
Rose. Beyond that the evidence is cloudy and conflicting. It is claimed
by Rose that this sum coming into his hands during a period of eight years
was paid to the Director in the following manner:
"i. By accounting to the Director for moneys received from students
after his annual reports were written, and which he never reported.
"2. By reporting to and paying over to the Director accounts which had
been settled on the ledger, but which had been overlooked till the close of
the year.
"3. By paying in currency dunng two years, and not bank checks, thus
having no means of showing the amounts paid.
"That these claims of Rose have great plausibility and many facts also
to confirm them, is plain. The testimony of Rose, corroborated as it is by
the transactions during the year in which the bank checks were used, and
showing that the accountings of Rose to the Director were correct, must
certainly have great weight.
"No effort was made by Dr. Rose to explain away hie responsibility in
the accounts of Wells and Grant except by explaining that these accounts
were paid at his house in connection with a board bill, and must inadver
tently have been omitted in the proper accounting next made, as well as
from the ledger.
"The frank manner in which Rose gave his testimony, apparently seeking
to cover up nothing, powerfully commends his statements to our fullest
credence.
"On the other hand, the vacillating, disingenuous, manner of Dr. Doug
las, his shameless contradictions and prevarications, as well as his contra
dictions of proven facts, excited in us no little pity and shame.
"We now submit the testimony in this case, and leave to this Legisla
ture and the people what to us has proved a source of great anxiety, care,
and labor.
"In conclusion, we may be allowed to express the firm conviction that
this unhappy affair will be properly treated by those who have the care
and management of the University in time to come,- and that, taught by
this unfortunate experience, they will exercise all needful vigilance in the
future.
"We also firmly trust that \v4ien the present excitement shall have passed
away and this matter shall be fully adjusted, the people of Michigan will
feel no less regard for an institution which in one generation has risen to
an influence so commanding, which has done so much for the honor of
our young and noble State, and which we believe will still go on in its
grand and noble work of giving the broadest culture, the noblest enter
prise and the richest benedictions to many whom it may attract to its
instruction."
Mr. McArthur, of the House committee, modified this report
by adding for himself:
"I concur in the conclusions generally of the committee, and in that
portion inculpating Dr. Douglas, but not so nearly exonerating Dr. Rose."
5/4 L1FE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
It was decided to prosecute to a judgment the bill named
as filed in the court, and, having been properly amended and
answered, what was probably one of the most intensely con
tested trials Michigan courts have ever experienced began on
the 5th of July and ended August nth, 1877. Mr. Storrs was
retained on behalf of Preston B. Rose by Mr. Rice A. Beal,
a wealthy resident of Ann Arbor, to whose noble aid, finan
cially and morally, Rose doubtless owes his sweeping victory
and Douglas the merited conclusion of his scheming.
The closing argument, given by Mr. Storrs through the days
of August 9, 10 and 11, before Judge G. M. Huntington, who
presided, cannot be well shown by scanty excerpts such as its
great length obliges. He himself deemed it one of the closest
efforts of reason he ever essayed. Certainly, it can no more be
illustrated by bits than can the real merits of this complicated
case be shown, or grasped, by a compressed statement. A cor
respondent of the Detroit Post, under date of August 11, 1877,
said:
"To say that Mr. Storrs made a fine speech does not do him justice.
As a speech it was grand; as a plea it was certainly magnificent, and as
an argument it was unanswerable, and carried conviction to all unbiased
minds. Nothing short of a verbatim report would convey an adequate idea
of its force and beauty and finish."
The report in full of his argument, as found entire among
Mr. Storrs' literary effects, would fill a good-sized book. It
begins:
"If your Honor pleases, after the great length of time which the trial of
this case has already consumed, it would, perhaps, be deemed in order to
proffer some apologies for further detaining your Honor in attempting to
discuss the immense amount of details in the presentation of which we have
consumed nearly six weeks. But the magnitude of the case — the extreme
seriousness of the issues which it involves ; the widespread interest which
attaches to it ; the fact that the interests of a great University are more or
less involved in it, and the further fact that the reputations of two men are
directly involved in this controversy, admonish me that apologies on such
an occasion would be out of order. I therefore have no apologies to make.
"I am performing simply a duty — a duty as important for me to perform
as that which devolves upon your Honor ; and I am very certain, judging
from the patient, earnest and careful attention which your Honor has given
this complicated case through these long weeks past, that no apology from
me is expected — none is required.
"I have said that the case is an exceedingly important one. The amount
THE GREAT ANN ARBOR CASE. 5/5
of money which is involved in it, if that were all, would have rendered this
great consumption of public and private time inexcusable. It is because
there are deeper and broader issues inextricably interwoven in it, and which
will not be put down, that the case is important. It is because an attack
most solemn, grave and serious in its character has been made by the
pleadings in this case upon the reputation of one whose reputation has hith
erto stood every way unsullied and unspotted. It is because, if these
charges are false there is no language of denunciation sufficiently vigorous
fittingly to characterize the wickedness and atrocity of the charge.
"And in the consideration of questions of this class, I think we, as law
yers, and your Honor, as Judge, for the same reason, ought to be proud
of that noble science of which we are all representatives. Coming before a
judge, when such momentous questions are presented, no matter how narrow
and limited the theater seems to be, it seems to enlarge with the magnitude
of the great subject before me ; the judge, himself, no matter how plain in
the common walks of life he may be, seems clothed with the sacred attri
butes of mercy and justice at the same time. It is in such a theater and
before such a tribunal that the lawyer is proud to practice. I propose to
undertake to convince your Honor and all else who hear, that the charge
against my client is atrociously wicked and false. I may as well refer here
to the commentary which has incessantly been made through this case with
reference to public opinion. What has it to do with the case? and where
fore have any allusions been made to it? These allusions to public opinion
are made for a purpose, and they are precisely of the same character that
they would be, if I addressed your Honor and asked you to give credit to
the story which Rose told, because an almost unanimous public opinion was
in his favor. Your Honor would scout and repudiate such a suggestion, as
you ought. Equally unprofessional and equally improper is the statement
so persistently made by the counsel for Professor Douglas that public opinion
stands recorded against them, in order that your Honor may not go with
that public opinion, but may be brave enough to defy it, and reach a con
clusion favorable to their client, simply because universal public opinion
has condemned and convicted him. Allusion has been made again and again
during the progress of this case to the large number of people who have
been in attendance upon this trial. Why are they here? Is Rose to be
punished for it? Dr. Rose has extended no invitations. They are not here
as his guests. And I say, too, that when courts are held in open daylight;
when the sunshine streams down upon their every proceeding, it is all the
better for the courts. There is nothing in this world that is not a little
better for being watched ; and that will be a sad and a sorry day for
the interests of purity in the administration of justice when the doors of the
court-rooms shall be closed, and its proceedings shall be in secret, behind
the door or in a corner."
A most detailed review of the case was then followed.
The counsel for Douglas had made great stress upon the pay
ment of money by Rose to* Douglas, on his being charged with
5/6 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
the failure to report the first payments, and then upon his execu
tion of the deed, when the evidence had seemed to gather about
him. Upon this point, Mr. Storrs ably remarked:
"There is nothing in this world easier than afterthought. There is nothing
in this world easier than that supreme judgment that looks at a train of
circumstances after the circumstances have all occurred, and declares ' I
would not have done so under those circumstances, and it was not wise to
do so under the circumstances.' There is nothing easier, and nothing which
indicates much less wisdom, and much less of common and ordinary jus
tice, not to say humanity, than thus to take any portion of a man's career,
and judge it strictly by its results, and apply to it these tests and circum
stances which surround us, utterly regardless of the difference between
those circumstances and those in which the party was situated upon whom
we are passing judgment. It is very easy indeed for us to say, and for
the world to say — if the world desires to say — that, 'had we been innocent
and in Rose's place, we would not have paid that £600 nor have executed
the deed.' Let us not be too sure about that. As a lawyer I have had some
experience in this direction. I have seen brave men, and pure and good
men pay money ; I have known them to pay it to suppress publicity of a
charge threatened against them, for which there was no earthly foundation.
There is not a lawyer on earth who has ever transacted business enough
of a professional character to entitle him to the name of a lawyer, whose
experience is not full of just such instances; but while we are ready with
our criticisms of Rose, and while we are so free to say what we would
have done, or would not have done under those circumstances, let us
remember that the case is not our case as we are situated, But is Rose s
case as he was situated. It is a wise saying, if a homely one, ' Put your
self in his place.' He was a cripple; his little home was all he had in
the world, and that he had paid for, giving the most sacred price that a
man ever paid for anything in this world — his own blood.
" He had been carried on step by step, not knowing whither he was
going, nor why. Paper after paper had been extracted from him ; it seemed
to him when this demand was finally made that he was absolutely envi
roned, utterly helpless, and without proof. He was ; he could not furnish
a scintilla of evidence that he had paid a dollar of these moneys demanded
of him. Environed in the web which had artfully been woven around him,
what would he do? In the name of Heaven and common justice what
could he do? To refuse was to lose everything — reputation, position, all
means of earning a living for those who were dependent upon him. To
refuse, the future was as black as night, and it had for this poor, environed
man not one Single ray of light or sunshine in it. To accede was, as he
reasoned, and he did not reason very badly, was to save all this. And
what did he do? Why, he acceded. And when we consider, retracing
our steps for a few moments, the position in which he was placed ; when
we consider that days and weeks had been devoted to the purpose of trick
ily worming evidences from him, so that finally, when the demand was
THE GREAT ANN ARBOR CASE. 577
made, a refusal of the demand was an impossibility ; and an acceding to
the demand was a necessity. All the evidence which is sought to be drawn
from the fact that when that demand was finally made he acceded to it,
that that acceding was an evidence of guilt, falls utterly and helplessly to
pieces, and if it proves anything in this world, it proves nothing more nor
less than the wickedness of the man who made the demand."
That portion of Mr. Storrs' argument pertaining to the ques
tion of forgery was simply masterful reasoning and a most mag
nificent illustration of legal logic. It consumed the whole of one
day, reveiwed pro and con every scrap of evidence relating to
Douglas' denial of his stub-signing, and evoked at times breath
less silence, only to be broken by bursts of applause which the
Court did not seem to be inclined to restrain. One of the coun
sel for Douglas, afterwards spoke of it, as "unequaled in courts of
reason."
Mr. Storrs closed his argument by a review of Dr. Douglas'
connection with the laboratory case from the beginning to the
hour of trial, showing twenty-seven instances of contradiction in
positions he had assumed, and summing up as follows:
" I do not present this list as complete; far from it. But under such a
load of falsehood as this, any other cause would have long ago been sunk
far out of sight. And could the counsel for Dr. Douglas have piled any
thing like such a number upon Rose, he would long ago have been driven
from the country, and no friend could have been found so close that he
would not long since have abandoned him and his defense. His evasions
and subterfuges, his statements of half truths, and suppressions of truths, it
is idle to attempt to set forth, for they would fill a volume and sicken the
very soul in their rehearsal.
"To add to this frightful catalogue still other evidences, seems useless
labor; but awful as the labor is, justice and truth demand that it should
be done. Not only has his course since the discovery of this deficiency
been trailed and discolored with falsehood, but his entire career with the
University, which so long trusted him, has been one steady and unbroken
history of deception and fraud.
"Up to i868-'9 his reports had all been itemized, and the forfeited accounts
reported. But then he suddenly ceased, and thenceforth lumped his accounts,
and reports in aggregated amounts, and omitted to report, at the same time,
the forfeited accounts, thus rendering the way for fraud easy, and thus
involving us in all, or nearly all, the doubts and uncertainties which we have
been compelled to meet, and which we have found it so difficult to solve. Into
these dark recesses of accounts of 'sundry persons' does he run all questionable
particulars and details, and under the convenient cover of these vague,
unbusiness like and dishonest generalities does he hide himself when danger
approaches. There is no better rule of law or justice than the one which
37
5/8 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
holds the party responsible for all uncertainties which he has himself created.
"Moreover, it was during these years that the largest amount of these
deficiencies occurred, and it is a curious and most significant commentary
upon his course — a course which he upon the stand confessed himself utterly
unable to explain — that when he ceased to report in detail, and began to
make his reports in lump, he ceased to report forfeited accounts at all.
" From his own book, now in evidence, it appears that his balances with
the University were forced by erasures and alterations, by general and con
venient sums charged as commissions, without the slightest specification of
details ; a system carrying its own commentary with it ; a system which not
only permits fraud, but invites it; a system so full of suspicion that it would
not be tolerated among ordinary business men an hour.
" Holding hundreds and thousands of dollars in his hands, belonging to
the University, which he used as his own, and of which he kept no separate
account, he still, as his books show, charges the University hundreds of
dollars as interest on moneys expended by him for the University, when he
held at the very time its funds largely in excess of these expenditures. He
seeks to excuse and explain this by the wretched pretense that the money
thus in his hands was held subject to be called for by the students, when
the proof now is, that no such call was ever made on him; that, of the
moneys paid to him, he never returned a dollar to the student, and in the
course of the business could not possibly have been called upon to do so.
" For years he held large sums of moneys as forfeited accounts in his
hands, which he never reported to the University, and which he never yet
has reported ; and that under the miserable pretext that it devolved upon
Rose to tell him when the proper time had arrived for him to pay the
money over, and admitting that if Rose had never told him, those sums
would have been a permanent investment in his hands.
"His reports carry, on their very face, the evidence of his manner of
dealing with the University — altered and erased until they are hardly recog
nizable. Many of them now show no footings, or only incomplete footings.
Balances have not been struck, and they are to-day in a condition entirely
inconsistent with honest or straightforward transactions.
"He stands convicted of having changed and altered his own books, and
of having mutilated and changed the records of the University, so that the
evidence which they furnished against him should be destroyed. His own
exhibits, after having been once used by him and withdrawn, are presented
on another occasion mutilated and essentially changed ; and yet he asks that
the records which he now presents should be accepted as truth.
"Never was destruction more signal or complete than Douglas has wrought
upon himself. To find any human being guilty of any offense on the testi
mony of the books or papers of a man whose credibility is thus ground to
powder, would not be injustice ; it would be judicial barbarism.
"Against Preston B. Rose no such record can be made. From a most
rigid cross-examination, covering four days, he came out absolutely unscathed.
Whenever comparisons were made between his testimony on former occa
sions and upon this trial, the agreement between them was perfect, save in
THE GREAT ANN ARBOR CASE. 579
a single instance, where the testimony delivered by him before the Legisla
tive Committee had, as was shown by the short-hand reporter, been incor
rectly printed. His books are absolutely correct, and challenge and defy
criticism. His manner upon the stand was admirable. His answers were
frank, direct, and bore the impress of truth with them. Is it to be won
dered at, that with such a record as Silas H. Douglas has thus made for
himself, he fears to be tried before a jury in the county or in the State in
which he has so long lived? No clamor as to the course pursued by the
defendant Beal will avail him; and it is but common justice to say here
and now, that from the first down to to-day, the course pursued by Mr.
Beal in this controversy has been such as to challenge and it will receive,
the hearty admiration of all right-minded and justice-loving men.
"Those graces which culture gives are desirable, it is true, but we can
well spare them, rather than to abate one jot or tittle of honest admiration
for a brave deed, such as the championship of the cause of the poor
against the rich, of the weak against the powerful, assuredly is.
" Public opinion may indeed be, and sometimes is, wrong, but it is
always honest. It is generally nearer the truth, and always more honest,
than that other opinion, organized in the closet or in the drawing-room,
whose methods are devious, whose routes are subterranean, and whose tri
umphs carry no laurels with them.
" I feel that the grave duty which has been imposed upon me as counsel
in the closing of this case has not been performed with that absolute com
pleteness and perfectness which the seriousness of the issue demands; but
if there ever was a case where I have reached the closing scenes, and
have felt in my very heart that the interests which I represent, and which
I stand up before a judge to present as an advocate, were those which
conscience sanctions, and which justice justifies — if I ever had such a case,
that case is this case ; and if I ever had such a client, that client is Pres
ton B. Rose, who to-day stands at the bar of this court, asking its judg
ment. For mercy, your Honor, we have no appeals to make. We deem
it necessary to make no appeals to anything except that solid, sound judg
ment, which acts on the facts, and on the facts alone. We appeal ^simply
to that judgment which is the 'same in a Chancellor off the bench that it
is on the bench. We appeal to that judgment which, in the ordinary
affairs of life, is guided by the teaching of human experience, and is some
what controlled by considerations of human probabilities. We appeal to
these same tests which all men of sound judgment and proper sense of
what is right and wrong apply, that the credibility of a man depends upon
the naturalness and the probability of the story which he relates.
"There is nothing, if the Court pleases, about Dr. Douglas, or his case,
there is nothing about the counsel who surround and defend him, there is
nothing about the friends whom he has, there is nothing about his social
position, there is nothing in any point of view that can relieve Dr. Doug
las from those inexorable rules of logic and law that, demonstrated to be
wilfully false and tricky in one particular, his entire case shall be affected
by it. It is on this evidence, it is with reference to it, it is from no con-
580 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
siderations of the importance of this case as the public may deem it impor
tant that we make our appeal, and this last appeal to your Honor for vin
dication; and whatever the result may be, come weal or come woe, we do believe
and we feel that it is so, that by the evidence in this case, Preston B. Rose stands
before the world, so far as the effect of these charges is concerned, abso
lutely and triumphantly vindicated. I believe, too, that as he takes this,
the final step of a long and toilsome journey which he has pursued, that
great and benign figure which we call Justice will come down from its
serene heights and its glittering eminences, that it will take the poor,
frightened subordinate of the olden times by the hand, it will cover him
with its shield, and it will protect him with its sword ; it will lead him
safely over every rocky place, past every difficult defile, and when those
shining gates shall at last open, there will be home, and wife, and chil
dren, thanking God for his sure and certain deliverance."
The wish expressed in this splendid peroration was realized.
CHAPTER XXIX.
THE LAW OF LIBEL.
THE GREAT FIRE OF CHICAGO — MANUSCRIPT OF A VALUABLE TREATISE DE
STROYED — LECTURE BASED ON THE RECOLLECTIONS OF A LOST] BOOK —
HISTORY OF THE TRIUMPH OF JURIES OVER JUDGES— SOME FAMOUS LIBEL
INSTANCES — MULTUM IN PARVO.
THE great fire of Chicago began the night of Sunday, Oc
tober 8, 1871. Mr. Storrs had been trying a trespass
case, and had just entered upon his argument for the defendant,
which he expected to close the following Monday. Mrs. Storrs
was in New York, and on Saturday received a telegram from her
husband in something like these words : " I have just com
menced argument in the Kimball case. Shall close Monday and
think I shall be able to start Monday or Tuesday night." On
Monday morning, at the breakfast table, she was informed that
Chicago was on fire ; and, like most people at a distance, thought
that the reports were exaggerated. As the telegrams came in,
" Sherman house burned," "Court-house burned," she began to
realize the extent of the calamity, and when the news came that
the Tribune office was destroyed, she naturally became very anx
ious, for Mr. Storrs' office was as that time across the street
from the Tribune office, on the southwest corner of Madison and
Dearborn streets. As soon as Mr. Storrs could get a message
through he telegraphed to her, " Don't come home. Office
burned. Fire down as far as Van Buren street." He added that
General Sheridan was blowing up buildings to stop the progress
of the fire, and that he did not think it would reach as far as
his house. He afterwards informed her that, having worked late
on his argument in the Kimball case, he had slept soundly through
the night, and knew nothing about the alarming extent of the
582 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
fire until Monday morning, when the housemaid informed him
that the fire, which he had heard had broken out on the west
side the previous evening, had now spread over on the south
side. The north side was then entirely gone, and the flames were
making rapid headway in a southerly direction. Through the
energetic measures taken by General Sheridan, the fire was stopped
at Van Buren street.
Mr. Storrs did not sit down in despondency, but the morning
after the burning of his office, he turned his dining-room on
Michigan Avenue into his law headquarters, and made the kitchen
serve the purpose of a dining-room as well; and from the base
ment window, hung out a board with his name on it. Not long
afterwards, Colonel John Van Arman, who had a large house in
Park Row, where he yet lives, invited Mr. Storrs to join him
there, as being nearer the business centre, and they continued to
practice their profession there, under the firm name of Storrs &
Van Arman, until the Hawley building was erected on the same
site where his offices had stood before, opposite the Tribune. He
then moved back there, remaining until May, 1873, when he
rented the offices on Washington Street which he continued to
occupy for twelve years, until the time of his death.
Mr. Storrs had only a day or two previous to the great fire
taken to his office the manuscript of an elaborate legal treatise,
arranged for publication in book form by the law-publishing
house of Callaghan & Company, upon the law of libel and slander.
At that date, there was no really good American text-work on
the subject, and, taken in connection with the author's rising
fame and forcible style, the publishers were expecting an unusually
saleable book. It was fully written, and it was for the final
revision and indexing that Mr. Storrs had carried the manuscript
to his office where it perished in the general wreck. Although fre
quently urged to reconstruct what had been destroyed he never, so far
as is known, made the attempt, but in a lecture before the Chicago
Law Institute, March 24, 1877, delivered upon very sudden
notice, he demonstrated that the many months of research upon
the law of libel, though made years before, were not wasted.
The lecture illustrated, also, in how compact and clear a manner,
he could trace the growth and workings of a great principle.
The lecture was as follows:
THE LAW OF LIBEL. 583
'•GENTLEMEN: The law of libel as it is now understood and administered
has but little about it that is venerable. In its present condition it is the
result of a long and bitter contest between power and the people, between
judges and juries. The people and the juries triumphed in that contest,
and that triumph secured the freedom of the press. ' The law of libel as
understood and administered throughout nearly the whole of the eigh
teenth century enabled the courts of law, as the authorized exponents of
morality and duty to the government, to declare any writing to be crimi
nal.' Viewing this question in an exclusively legal point of view, it is hardly
possible to resist the inference that the question of libel or no libel was a
question for the court, and that the averment of the malicious intention of
the publisher was an averment which did not require proof. The popular
sentiment which found its expression through the juries, and finally through
the legislature, was undoubtedly right in denouncing the existence of this
power in the courts as fatal to liberty.
"Very briefly I purpose to give you a sketch of that memorable con
test between juries and judges, and in which in the interests of civil liberty
and the freedom of the press the former so signally triumphed.
" From its begining to its close the contest was one between the govern
ment and the people. The first notable instance of this conflict occured
during the administration of Lord Chief Justice Hardwicke, who enunciated
the law that juries in cases of libel were merely to consider questions of
fact as to the writing or the inferences, but happily the juries never accepted
Lord Hardwicke's reading of the law.
"The presentation of this great issue in such shape as to attract public
attention to its vital consequence was reserved for Lord Mansfield, during
the reign of George III., and arose in the prosecution of Woodfall, for the
publication of a letter supposed to reflect upon his majesty the king. There
was in that case no doubt as to the publishing, and the attempt was made
to persuade the jury that the letter was not libelous, and thus the great
question was distinctly presented, whether this was a question for the jury
or exclusively for the court. Lord Mansfield said : ' All the jury had to
consider was whether the defendant had published the letter set out in the
information, and whether the innuendoes imputing a particular meaning to
particular words, as that 'the K.' meant his majesty King George III., but
that they were not to consider whether the publication was, as alleged in
the information, false and malicious, these being mere formal words, and
that whether the letter -was libelous or innocent was a pure question of law,
upon which the opinion of the court might be taken by a demurrer or a
motion in arrest of judgment.'
"The effect of this decision was to convict the accused, and then compel
him to take his chances by a submission of the real question of libel or
no libel to a court afterward.
"The jurors were, however, disinclined to subscribe to Lord Mansfield's
rulings, and returned a verdict 'guilty of the printing aud publishing only*
This verdict was subsequently set aside, and Woodfall was secure.
"An information had also been filed against one Miller for the publication
584 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
of an alleged seditious libel, which came on for trial before Lord Mansfield.
In that case he very solemnly told the jury that the question for their de
termination was whether the defendant printed and published a paper of the
tenor and meaning charged in the information, and that they had nothing
to do with the question as to whether the paper was or was not a libel, but
that if they believed that a paper of the tenor and meaning charged in the
information had in part been published by the defendant, they should find
a verdict of guilty.
"There was no doubt as to the publication, yet so strongly did public
opinion set against this view of the law, that the jury rendered a verdict of
not guilty, upon which many thousand people in a procession proceeded to
the house of Lord Mansfield, proclaiming the verdict.
"The rulings of Lord Mansfield in Woodfall's case were made the topic of
discussion in the House of Lords, and at a sitting of the house Lord Camden
presented to Lord Mansfield the following points :
"i. Does the opinion mean to declare that upon the general issue of not
guilty, in the case of a seditious libel, the jury have no right by law to
examine the innocence or criminality of the paper if they think fit, and to
form their verdict upon such examination ?
"2. Does the opinion mean to declare that in the case above mentioned,
where the jury have delivered in their verdict guilty, this verdict has found
the fact only and not the law ?
"3. Is it to be understood by this opinion that if^the jury come to the bar
and say that they find the printing and publishing, but that the paper is no
libel, the jury are to be taken to have found the defendant guilty generally,
and the verdict must be so entered up?
"4. Whether the opinion means to say that the judge, after giving his
opinion of the innocence or criminality of the paper, should leave the con
sideration of that matter, together with the printing and publishing, to the
jury, such a discretion would be contrary to law ?
"Lord Mansfield declined the discussion.
"This great question was renewed in the case of the dean of St. Asaph.
Sir William Jones, whose loyalty was beyond all dispute, and who stood
intellectually among the first men of the time, had written a tract entitled
'A Dialogue Between a Gentleman and a Farmer,' a plea in very mild
terms for parliamentary reform, and his brother-in-law, the dean of St.
Asaph, had recommended it to a Welsh reform society and caused it to be
reprinted.
"Thereupon an indictment was preferred against the dean and was brought
on to trial before Mr. Justice Briller. The defense was conducted by Erskine.
The court said to the jury : ' If you are satisfied that the defendant did
publish this pamphlet, and are satisfied as to the truth of the innuendoes, you
ought in point of law to find him guilty.' Upon the return of the jury into
court the following remarkable scene occurred (p. 165) : Erskine moved for
a new trial, referring to which he said : ' I move the motion from no hope
of success, but from a fixed resolution to expose to public contempt the
doctrines fastened upon the public as law by Lord Chief Justice Mansfield,
THE LAW OF LIBEL. $85
and to excite if possible the attention of parliament to so great an object
of national freedom.'
"The motion came on before Lord Mansfield and was by him overruled,
he holding that the question of libel or no libel was exclusively for the
court. This famous cause created great feeling and finally resulted in the
passage of what has since been known as Fox's Libel Bill, declaring that on
a trial for libel the jury in their verdict should have the right to take into
consideration the character and tendency of the paper alleged to be libelous.
This famous bill became a law in 1792, eight years after the decision in
the dean of St. Asaph's case :
"It is entitled. 'An act to remove doubts suspecting the functions of
juries in cases of libel,' and it enacts that the jury may give a general
verdict of guilty or not guilty upon the whole matter put in issue upon the
indictment or information, and shall not be required or directed by the
court or judge before whom it shall be tried to find the defendant guilty
merely on the proof of the publication of the paper charged to be a libel
and of the sense ascribed to the same in the indictment or information.
"Provided that on every such trial the court or judge before whom it
shall be tried shall according to their discretion give their opinion and
direction to the jury on the matter in issue in like manner as in other crim
inal cases.
" But the victory was by no means fully won, for the judges, in violation
of both the letter and spirit of the statute found methods of evading it.
"The first prominent case after that bill became a law was a prosecution
for libel on an information filed against the proprietor of The Morning
Chronicle, for publishing certain resolutions of a public meeting held at
Derby in favor of parliamentary reform and against abuses in the govern
ment. The case was tried before Lord Chief Justice Kenyon, and, as Lord
Campbell observes, ' To the chief justice's shame, it must be recorded that
he misconstrued and perverted this noble law, establishing a precedent which
was followed for near half a century, to the manifest grievance of the
accused.' Lord Kenyon, in charging the jury, said, 'I am bound by oath
to answer that I think this paper was published with a wicked, malicious
intent to vilify the government, and to make the people discontented with
the constitution under which they live,' and, again, 'On this ground I con
sider it a gross and seditious libel.'
"But, notwithstanding all this, the jury found a verdict of 'guilty of
publishing, but with no malicious intent,' and being told that this verdict
could not be received, after sitting up all night, they next morning returned
a verdict of 'not guilty.'
"The bad precedent thus set by Lord Kenyon was followed by much
greater men. An information was brought in the year 1811 against Leigh
Hunt for publishing an article against the excess to which the punishment
of flagellation had been carried in the army.
"The cause was tried before Lord Ellenborough, who said to the jury:
'I have no doubt this libel has been published with the intention imputed
to it, and that it is entitled to the character given to it by the information.'
586 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
"Nevertheless, to the unspeakable mortification of the judge, the jury
found a verdict of 'not guilty.'
"But the most complete triumph of the juries over the courts was witnessed
in the famous trials of Hone, for libel, based upon parodies of a political
character.
"Hone, a poor, obscure, and threadbare publisher, defended himself.
His first trial was had before Mr. Justice Abbott, and resulted, notwith
standing the earnest efforts of the court to secure a conviction, in a verdict
of not guilty.
"Lord Ellenborough determined that he would sit upon the trial of the
other cases, and did so, and nothing in the whole range of English juris
prudence is more interesting than the contest between the obscure book
seller and the great judge, at whose frown the entire English bar would
tremble.
" Daunted but not altogether discouraged, Lord Ellenborough insisted on
putting the third information upon trial, which resulted in a verdict of 'not
guilty.' The poor book-seller had triumphed, and here ended his lordship's
judicial career.
"Upon the second trial he had said to the jury: 'I will deliver to you
my solemn opinion, as I am required by act of parliament to do under
the authority of that act, and still more in obedience to my conscience
and my God. I pronounce it to be a most impious and profane libel'
" It was all of' no avail, for whatever the noble lord's solemn opinion might
be, the jury was determined that there should be in England free expres
sion of opinion on political opinions, and they manfully met the chief jus
tice with their verdict of 'not guilty.'
"By all friends of a free press everywhere these successive verdicts were
regarded as great victories.
"As complete as was Hone's triumph, much remained to be done.
" The doctrine laid down by Lord Mansfield in Rex vs. Almon, in which
he held that a sale by a servant was prima facie evidence of a publication
by the master, was, during the reign of terror upon the outbreak of the
first French revolution, grossly perverted, and judges refused evidence to
prove that libelous articles had been inserted in newspapers when the regis
tered proprietor who was prima facie answerable, was not only lying uncon
sciously sick in bed at the time of the publication but had given express
orders to the acting editor that the articles should not be admitted. The
occurrence of such iniquity is forever prevented by Lord Campbell's libel
act, which saves the master from criminal responsibility for an unauthorized
publication by the servant.
"Not until the year 1845 could the truth of the facts stated in the publi
cation be inquired into in the English courts, which was expressly permit
ted by Lord Campbell's libel bill permitting the truth to be given in evi
dence and referring it to the jury to decide whether the defendant was act
uated by malice or by a desire for the good of the community.
" By the same act, — and this I submit is a great and needed improve
ment in the law — the publisher is permitted to plead that the libel was
THE LAW OF LIBEL. 587
published without actual malice or gross negligence, and that at the earli
est opportunity, and before action, he published a full apology in his own
newspaper, or if that were published at a longer interval than a week, in
some paper selected by the injured person, and that he had paid into court
such sums as secured a fair compensation for the injury.
"I venture the suggestion that a statute of a similar character would be
well here. It would protect the publisher against suits brought for merely
money purposes, and prompted by mercenary motives. It would furnish a
sufficient protection to those injured by such publications. It would remove
the shame of inflicting upon a publisher, absolutely guiltless as far as mali
cious intent was concerned, of any offense whatever, a penalty amounting
in some instances to a fortune, and that too where the actual injury suffered
had been trifling. In short, such a law would protect both parties — the
injured party to the extent of recompensing him for the damages actually
sustained by him; the publisher to the extent of protecting him against
vexatious and expensive litigation. Great changes and modifications in the
law of libel other than those I have indicated, have been worked by the
silent but most effective agency of public opinion.
"The doctrine of privileged co.mmunication has been greatly extended,
and now embraces not only such necessary statements as men may make
with reference to the character of their servants and agents in the prosecu
tion of and for the protection of their own interests, the publication of the
proceedings of courts of justice and of legislative and other public bodies,
but criticism although erroneous, upon public men and public measures,
upon literary performances, books, pictures, public speeches — in fact, upon
all such enterprises as appeal to the public for support. The law of privi
leges as now held does not require infallibility of judgment, it exacts merely
honesty of purpose.
"Gentlemen, we are all as lawyers peculiarly interested in a free press, and
also interested in preventing the prostitution to unworthy purposes of the
great power which the press wields.
"The freedom which the press to-day enjoys has been won after hard and
bitter contests. But little of this freedom \vas voluntarily given to it, but
it wrested it after hard-fought battles from the stern grip of power.
"Hardwicke, Mansfield, Kenyon, Butler, Tenterden, Ellenborough, all
great judges, and, as the world went, good men, could not conceive that
the government which smiled upon and ennobled them could be improved.
Such a government to them seemed perfect, and any criticism upon it a
crime. They did not seem to know that although the sun shone upon them,
there were millions whose hearts and homes its rays never reached. Thus
they leagued themselves with power, and the great reform worked its way
upward ; it did not come from the great and powerful down to the weak
and the lowly, but from those beneath to those above.
"The freedom of the press is no glittering, barren theory. It is a great
vital principle, which we must guard, no part of which can ever be sur
rendered."
CHAPTER XXX.
RESUMPTION OF SPECIE PAYMENTS.
MR. STORKS AT SYCAMORE, ILLINOIS, 1 878— EXPLODED THEORIES OF FINANCE
— DOES INFLATION INFLATE? — HISTORY OF PAPER CURRENCY INFLATION IN
THE PAST — THE PANIC OF 1873 NOT BROUGHT ABOUT BY A LACK OF CUR
RENCY — PROPOSITION TO "RESTORE CONFIDENCE" BY AN ACT OF CONGRESS
— FIAT MONEY A PROJECT OF REPUDIATION — THE PHILOSOPHER'S STONE A
RATIONAL SCHEME COMPARED WITH IT — MR. GLADSTONE'S TRIBUTE TO
THE4 ACHIEVEMENTS OF AMERICA IN PAYING HER DEBT.
THOSE who have followed Mr. Storrs' political utterances up
to this point will have seen that he was earnestly in favor
of preserving the national honor and credit by paying the war
debt dollar for dollar, and that he was vehemently opposed to
the Pendleton scheme of making the government bonds, contracted
for in gold, redeemable in greenbacks of depreciated value.
Equally sound and practical was he in opposing the theories of
those who thought that the pressure of hard times was owing to
the scarcity of currency, and that the government could at will
relieve this pressure by printing off an indefinite number of bills
and labelling them money. The fiat money men were rampant
in 1878, when Mr. Storrs delivered at Sycamore, Illinois, one of
the ablest, and most convincing arguments against these delusions
that was ever made. This speech was printed and circulated,
and did great service in keeping the Illinois merchants and
farmers true to their convictions on this important question. The
business men of Illinois were nearly all hard money men, — or,
as Mr. Storrs put it, "honest money" men; but the clamorers
for fiat money were making converts, and this address was timely,
and salutary in its effects.
Having received a copy of this very lucid address, Judge
Porter, of New York, wrote Mr. Storrs as follows:
588
RESUMPTION OF SPECIE PAYMENTS. 589
"New York, Nov. 7, 1878.
•«MY DEAR STORKS :
" I have just finished a second reading of your speech at Sycamore. It
is simply superb. I don't know what that word was invented for, except to
apply to just such a masterpiece. It is not merely splendid in its rhetoric,
and iron-clad in its logic, but it opens through a valley of thick darkness a
path of clear, shining and blazing light.
"With hearty thanks and congratulations,
"Your friend,
"JOHN K. PORTER."
To Judge Blodgett he sent a copy of this address with a
characteristic note, which may here find a fitting place:
"MY DEAR JUDGE :
" Never having had any money I have always had a desire to read
about it, as the only means of ever acquiring any knowledge of that subject.
"The result of my readings and my meditations is embodied in the
speech of which I send you herewith a printed copy.
"Please to compare my theoretical knowledge of money with, your prac
tical experience with it. "Yours very respectfully,
" EMERY A STORRS."
From this valuable, discussion of the money question the
following extracts are made.
"It is persistently urged by the advocates of the new theories of finance
that the currency has been contracted, and that all business interests have
seriously suffered by this alleged contraction. If the amount of currency
in circulation is to be determined by its purchasing power, the state
ment is grossly untrue. The volume of currency necessary for the legiti
mate wants of business is determined, not by the number of pieces, nor the
denominations of metal in circulation, but by the value and purchasing
power of the metal. If in the exercise of that fiat power, which it is now
claimed that Congress possesses, it had during the war issued five hundred
million pieces of iron of the size of the Eagle, and stamped each piece ten dol
lars, making it a legal tender to that amount, we should have had an immense
nominal circulation, but the substitution in the place of the five hundred
millions of iron fiat Eagles of two hundred and fifty millions of gold Eagles,
would not have been a contraction, but an immense inflation of the circu
lating medium.
"There are two methods of 'inflating' the currency: One is, to enhance
and continually increase the value and purchasing power of that already in
circulation. Another is, to add to an already depreciated currency more
depreciated currency, the sure result of which is the swift decline of both
new paper currency and of old, until all is buried in a common grave
of worthlessness.
"No legislative enactment has yet been sufficiently powerful to prevent
the measurement of the value of the paper dollar by comparing it with the
59O LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
gold dollar. On the 3oth day of June, 1864, one gold dollar would buy
very nearly three times as much labor, or anything else that anyone on
this earth had to sell, as the paper dollar. Hence, in 1864, one gold
dollar would do three times as much business as the paper dollar, would
employ three times as many people, would purchase three times as much
food or clothing. In the meantime, the value of the gold dollar has not
depreciated, but the value of the paper dollar has very nearly trebled, so
that the fanner with one thousand dollars in bank to-day, has as much
actual money as in June, 1864, he had with three thousand dollars in bank
to his credit.
"The inflation of paper currency, by adding to its volume to meet the
supposed requirements of business, universally fails of its purpose. The
value or purchasing power of the currency depreciates with each addition
to its volume, until there is great force in the call for 'more money,'—
because, for all practical purposes, there is finally ' no money ' at all. All
experiments of this character have passed through the same dismal experi
ence and terminated in disaster.
"The history of paper currency inflations in the past, ought to furnish
us guides for our present policy, and to the wise, that history will not pass
unheeded. As far back in our history as the year 1723, the scheme of
government issues of paper currency, loaned by the government on real-
estate security, was fully tested in Pennsylvania. Fifteen thousand pounds
in paper currency was issued and put in the hands of the commissioners of
each county, according to the taxable assessment. The commissioners
loaned the bills at five per cent, on mortgage of land. The scheme was
tested to the bitter end, and proved a calamitous and shameful failure. The
same scheme was adopted in New England as early as the year 1715,
and bank after bank was established, for, soon after each issue, money mys
teriously became 'scarce,' and led to the necessity of new issues. The
historian of that period tells us that ' all who had received loans joined as a
compact body in favor of further issues. All new issues to others depreci
ated the currency and enabled them to pay back more easily. However
(he says) they did not in many cases pay at all either principal or interest.
Having accumulated large arrears, they decamped, and when process issued
they could not be found.'
"Speaking of the paper currency of that time, Hutchinson says: 'The
influence which a bad currency has on the morals of a people is greater
than is generally imagined.' But mark the course of events, and observe
how history repeats itself. In 1715 the governor recommended the assem
bly to take measures to revive the low state of trade. And they accordingly
issued one hundred thousand pounds of bills, ' because bills were scarce.'
These were issued on loan, and there was an immediate rise in prices —
hence bills were again scarce. In 1719 a fiat money man of that period
declared that ' £50,000 ought to be laid out for building a bridge over Charles
river, so that workmen might be employed and currency enlarged, as well as
the public accommodated, and (he says) ruin will come unless more bills of
credit are emitted.'
RESUMPTION OF SPECIE PAYMENTS. 59 1
"In 1720 trade was stagnant, and there was a great cry for more bills.
How rapidly even in those early days the country -grew up' to the
absurdly inflated and excessive volume of currency.
"For the purpose of bringing about issues of paper, 'expeditions were
favored and public works were advocated.' Listening to this clamor for
'more money,' Massachusetts, in 1721, issued ,£'100,000 and forbade buying
and selling silver. Money again became ' scarce,' and in 1724 there was
an additional issue of £30,000.
"In 1727 money was again 'scarce,' trade was stagnant, and in this year £50,-
ooo was issued to redeem in part the old issue; and on the same basis, and ' be
cause bills were scarce,' £60,000 more was issued in 1728.
" At this point the Colony was no longer allowed to issue paper currency,
and bank projects were revived. Notwithstanding the immense volume of
currency outstanding, the year 1733 was one of great distress in New
England. 'Trade was stagnant and money scarce.' Rhode Island issued
£100,000. The Boston merchants issued £110,000. Silver rose enormously.
In 1737 'new tenor' bills were issued at the rate of one for three of the
old. In 1739 the Land Bank Scheme was revived, and the preamble of
the bank schedule recited, — that it is organized ' in order to redress the
existing circumstances which the trade of this province labors under for
want of a medium.' The large merchants refused its notes, but in the
hands of the small dealers there was over £35,000.
. " Another bank was also organized, called the specie bank, which was to
issue £120,000 in notes redeemable in silver. At every new issue the cur
rency depreciated, carrying old and new with it. In 1749, Massachusetts
had out the enormous circulation of £2,466,712, and at that time exchange
on London stood at 1,100! Trade was then at its lowest ebb. Ship build
ing and fisheries had declined — people were moving away — and by what
means, think you, was prosperity restored ? The people had tried during
the period of thirty-four years every scheme for relief which is recommended
by the Nationals, Greenbackers, and Fiatists of the present day. They had,
finally, for Massachusetts alone, a paper currency barely one million pounds
less than the circulation of the Bank of England at that time.
"Money was scarce — trade was stagnant — all business enterprises were
drooping. They had tried all these experiments which are recommended
to us to-day, and all miserably failed. The inflexible laws of trade, as
inflexible as those great natural laws by which the universe is governed
stubbornly refused to be coerced.
" But one experiment was left — that was finally tried, and that experiment
was resumption. It worked almost instantly and marvelously. Massachu
setts devoted her share of the ransom of Louisburg, which came to her
from the mother country in specie, to the cancellation of this outstanding
paper, eleven to one. Prices were at once adjusted to this new measure,
and the coin remained with them when it had no meaner competitor.
Rhode Island and New Hampshire, adhering to their old ways, found their
trade transferred to the coin colony. The trade of Newport was at once
transferred to Salem and Newport and nothing, more was heard in Massachu
setts of the scarcity of money until she repeated her old errors.
592 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
•
" Perhaps the most striking illustration of an inflated currency, and the
evils attending it, which our history furnishes, is to be found in the Conti
nental money. The Continental Congress had issued paper for £9,000,000
before the depreciation began, and at every successive addition to that
volume, the whole mass sank. Congress did its best to sustain the bills,
but all was of no avail. In 1780, #200,000,000 of bills were out. They
were then worth two cents on the dollar, and then sank to rise no more.
So that while £9,000,000 of currency were worth in 1776, £9,000,000, in 1780,
only four years afterwards, £200,000,000 bills were worth only £4,000,000.
History repeated itself during the rebellion, for during the earlier years of
the war, the addition to the volume of the currency reduced the purchasing
power of the entire mass to a point below the original volume.
"The difference between coin and every other commodity is clear, and
is this, that specific quantities of other things are needed, 'whilst of gold
it is specific values' A definite piece of cloth of a given size is needed
for the coat ; a definite piece of leather of a given size for the shoe ; a defi
nite piece of iron or steel of a given weight for the railway track. If iron
and cloth and leather were all cheapened, no more iron, or cloth or leather
would be issued for the specific coat, boots or railway track — although more
coats, boots and railway tracks might be manufactured. No man wrould
wear a larger coat, or increase the size of his boots, because of a sudden
decline in the price of cloth and leather. Whereas, if gold were cheapened
we should be compelled for the purposes of coin to use more gold.
"Prominent among the remedies suggested by the Greenbackers for our
present financial difficulties, is the demand made by them, perhaps more
persistently than any other, for the Destruction of the National Banks.
The objections urged against the National Banks are numerous, and these
I will consider *in detail. It is claimed, I. That they are Monopolies.
There can be no mistake as to the meaning of the word 'monopolize.' It
is ' to buy up so as to be the only purchaser and seller ; to obtain the
monopoly or the whole of,' and 'monopoly' signifies 'the exclusive posses
sion of anything; sole right of selling.' The basis of the National Banks is
the government bonds. The banks have not bought up all these bonds.
Any one can readily buy all the bonds that he has the money to pay for.
Nor is the right to use the government bonds as a banking capital, and as
a basis for circulation conferred upon any men or class of men. That
right is absolutely open and free to all ; the farmer, the mechanic, in fact
everybody is invited to join this monopoly, to participate in its benefits,
profits, and advantages.
"There is no more monopoly in banking than there is in farming. True
it is that everybody has not the money to buy government bonds, and
true it also is, that everybody has not the money to pay for a farm, or the
credit to buy one on time. I assume that it is not asked that the govern
ment shall give these bonds to needy people, who have not the money to
buy them, in order to enable those needy people to go into the banking
business. That enterprise would certainly not be profitable. As well might
you ask the government to give every unemployed Greenbacker a farm, as
to give him a bond.
RESUMPTION OF SPECIE PAYMENTS. 593
"In these particulars, at least, the National Banks are not monopolies.
How then are they so? Certainly it is not for the reason that the owner
ship of the capital of the National Banks is in few hands. There are 208,
486 owners of National Bank shares. An alarming number of monopolists.
Of this army of shareholders, only 767 own over 50x3 shares. In the State
of New York there are 1,482,746 shares of National Bank stock owned by
34,181 persons, an average of 43 shares to each person.
"Pennsylvania National Banks have 884,539 shares owned by 29,895
persons, or an average of 29 shares to each person. The Massachusetts
banks have 988,700 shares, owned by 51,726 persons, an average of 19
shares to each person ; and of these shareholders, 32,235 persons own ten
shares or less. How utterly in the face of these figures, all this denuncia
tion of the National Banks as great monopolists, appears. A great army of
over 208,000 men, women and children, whose savings and whose little
fortunes are invested in these bank shares, are the bloated monopolists
against whom the wrath of the noisy demagogue is directed.
"2. The second objection made to the National Banks is, that they
receive interest on their bonds deposited as security for their circulation,
and also upon the circulation itself. This is objected to, and it is claimed
that the people are thus compelled to pay about fifteen millions of dollars
per year as one of the expenses of maintaining the National Banking, from
which they would be relieved if that system were abolished. The present
National Bank circulation may be stated in round numbers at $291,000,000.
This circulation is secured by deposits of £343, 000,000 on government
bonds. The account between the National Banks and the people, so far as
the question of interest is concerned, may be thus briefly stated:
"Paid to the Banks as interest on $291,000,000 government bonds. $14,595,000
"But the Banks pay—
"United States taxes paid last year $7,076,087
"State, county and municipal taxes 9,701,732
—$16,777,819
"In other words, the people have received and been benefited by taxes
paid by the National Banks, $2,182,819 more than the interest they have
received from the government.
"But let us pursue this investigation still further. Suppose that the
National Banks are wiped out of existence, what relief, so far as this
question of interest is concerned, does that give ? Do we get rid of paying
that interest? By no means, for upon the surrender of the circulation, the
bonds must be returned to the owners, and the government still continues
to pay the interest on those identical bonds.
" If greenbacks are substituted in place of the National Bank notes, they
will be loaned out to the borrower on interest but will pay no taxes to
the government. What do you gain, then, by abolishing the National
Banks ? Clearly if you substitute greenbacks you lose over $7,000.000 of
annual taxes which the National Banks now pay, and your greenback is
no more secure than the National Bank note. .
" Finally, it is urged against the National Banks that during all the
38
594 UFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
time which has intervened since the panic of 1873, they have continually
prospered, and that this prosperity has been at the expense of the people.
The difficulty with this suggestion is that the facts do not seem to sus
tain it.
"The banking capital of New York city in 1873 was .... $88,051,800
"Surplus was 38,867,100
"Total $126,918,900
" In 1878 the banking capital was #67,072,800
" Surplus 28,093,600
"Total $95,166,400
"Showing a total reduction of $31,752,500.
"It is certainly very curious that these banks should in five years
voluntarily reduce their capital $21,000,000, if the business in which they
were engaged was so prosperous, and the circulation of their notes so
desirable as the Greenbackers claim.
"The more conservative of those who seek financial reforms, and insist
upon the discontinuance of the National Banks, would not probably favor
a re-establishment of the State banks, but rather a substitution of green
backs in place of the National Bank note circulation. Upon this point
there may be honest differences of opinion, but it is clear that there are so
many difficulties attending the emission of a circulating medium by the
Government, that the plan ought never to be pursued save under the
stress of some great and overriding emergency. The history of the Green
back and its origin shows very clearly that it was not intended as a per
manent policy of the nation, but in the presence of a great rebellion the
Government under the pressure of a supposed necessity, resorted to its own
promises, to which they attached the legal-tender characteristics for the
purpose of enabling them to meet the enormous expenditures suddenly
forced upon them. Under the peculiar circumstances then existing, no
difficulties were encountered in finding avenues for circulation, for the Gov
ernment was itself an immense buyer in the markets, and paid for its pur
chases in its own promises to pay in the future. Thus easily enough the
Greenback found a circulation, but after a certain point had been reached,
prices began steadily to advance and continued as steadily to advance with
each new issue, until finally the purchasing power of the Greenback, as I
have already shown, was reduced to nearly one-third the gold dollar.
"The first issues of Greenbacks were in April, 1862, and by August of
that year specie was entirely driven out of circulation. The advance of
prices necessarily led to a vast increase in the expenditures, and it would
be idle to estimate how much of our national debt is the legitimate result
of paper inflation. The advance in the price of gold was constant. In
1863 it reached $1.40-50, thus reducing the paper dollar to 65 or 75 cents.
As inflation was continued this depreciation of the Greenback kept steady
pace with it until June 17, 1864, congress interposed its fiat and forbade
time rates for gold. The effect of this was immediate, but not at all what
RESUMPTION OF SPECIE PAYMENTS. 595
was anticipated. Gold advanced in face of the fiat, and on the 3Oth of
June, 1864, had reached $2.85. On the 2d of July, 1864, the law was
repealed, and gold declined.
"The war had closed. The Government had gone out of the markets.
Its enormous demand had ceased, and all saw that there was and could
by no possibility be any legitimate employment for all the currency which
the Government had put into circulation. Hence with almost universa
approbation the country resolved upon contraction as the first step toward
resumption. In December, 1865, the House voted 144 to 6, to authorize a
contraction of $10,000,000, in the then next six months, and of $4,000,000
per month after that. This went on until January, 1868, 'but in the mean
time the National Banks were going into operation, being allowed $300,
000,000 of circulation, and their notes more than compensated for the
greenbacks withdrawn. There was therefore practically but little reduction
of the currency,' and in 1867 speculation began to spring up, stimulated by
the excess of circulating medium, and these speculations, wild and reckless
as they now appear to be, absorbed the redundant currency until again in
1873 'money was scarce."
"As a measure of great overriding public necessity, the Government
during the war made its promises to pay a legal tender for the payment
of debts ; thus changing the terms of every contract for the payment of money
thereafter to be performed, and confiscating at one blow, at least one-half
the outstanding credits of the nation. Such a policy is never resorted to
save in the direst extremity and under the pressure of a necessity no less
than the preservation of the national existence. There are those who
believe that it can never be justified, for they argue that it never can
be necessary. But however that may be, nothing but the supposed pres
ence of this great emergency ever justified the Government in the exercise
of this most dangerous power.
"To-day no such necessity exists. The greenbacks having been made a
legal tender as a war measure, we can with no more propriety continue to
make them legal tenders, after peace has been fully restored, than Govern
ment could to-day declare martial law in Chicago, or make military arrests
here, when we are menaced by no enemy, when peace is profound, when
the courts are in the complete, perfect and undisturbed enjoyment of all
their functipns.
"I have still failed to touch upon what has been in many quarters of
the country regarded as the strongest ground upon which those disaffected
with the present condition and management of our financial affairs stand.
I mean the demand for Fiat Money. I certainly do not wish to misstate
the positions held by those who advocate and proclaim this theory, and,
in a very general way, it seems to be that the Government should issue,
for the payment of its bonds and in unlimited quantities, a paper cur
rency irredeemable in its character, to which no obligation of the Govern
ment, either at present or in the future, is to be attached, which shall be a
legal tender for the payment of all debts, which shall be accepted in
payment of revenues, and which shall be declared by act of Congress
Jo be money.
596 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
"The difficulty in reasoning upon this proposition arises, in a great
measure, from its utter disregard of what up to the present time we had all
considered as fundamental ideas in government. We have hitherto supposed
that any scheme of finance which could be shown to be injurious to the
national credit, in any degree a violation of the public faith or of public
engagements, would be, upon such a showing, at once rejected. But here
is a scheme which openly proclaims a violation and repudiation of national
obligations as the very end sought for. Such a proposition stuns one.
It is as embarrassing as it would be in the discussion of a mathematical
question for one of the parties to dispute the multiplication table and
call for its immediate repeal.
"This new money starts without a foundation and ends without sub
stance. The old pursuit of the philosopher's stone, the efforts of the
alchemists to transmute, by some mysterious agencies, a base metal into
a better one, lead into gold, was rational compared with the fiat money
project. For the alchemist did start with something substantial, and pro
posed to wind up with something better ; he started with lead or iron and
proposed to close with gold, while the fiatists start with nothing, and end
with what they started with. A legislative body, howsoever powerful
and able it may be in the adjustment of political problems, has no
more power to change the nature of things, or to create something out
of nothing, than the old alchemist possessed. The attempt is pure sor
cery, and will be as ineffectual and as unavailing as would the effort
by act of Congress to make grass grow on barren rocks and without
seed, or to change the course of the seasons.
"Not only are all natural laws in conflict with this wild and ruinous
scheme, but it is in the teeth of all human experience, past and present.
It is claimed that the stamp of the Government gives value to the gold
Eagle, and the same stamp would be sufficiently efficacious to give an
equal value to a paper Eagle. Assuredly this is not true. Passing the
consideration of the question as to the inherent and intrinsic value of
gold, let us take a simple illustration. Suppose that a twenty-dollar gold
piece, fresh from the Mint, with the Government stamp clear and bright
upon it, were subjected to a hammering process so severe that every mark
of the stamp were effaced, that neither letter, figures, nor symbol of any
kind was visible upon it ; let its shape be changed, roll into a sphere, pound
it into any shape you please, leave the quantity of the metal unimpaired,
and you still have substantially twenty dollars in value. On the other hand
take your fiat piece of paper upon which the Government has stamped or
printed 'This is twenty dollars.' Rub out that inscription, roll into a sphere,
and it is a paper wad, of the value of a paper wad, no more, no less.
"It is quite clear, therefore, that there is between the paper and the coin
an inherent and essential difference in their intrinsic value. Paper money
dies with the Government which issued it, and becomes valueless. Gold
coin endures when the Government which stamped it has passed out of
recorded history, and is removed into the dim periods of tradition. Should
there be found in the tomb of a mummy thousands of years old a gold
RESUMPTION OF SPECIE PAYMENTS. 597
coin, its purchasing power — its value — inheres in it, and the currents of
ages have not worn it away. But the Confederate note found its grave
before the last ditch of the Confederacy itself was reached.
" If the use of fiat money could be limited to its legitimate range of
operations, there would possibly be no very serious objections to it. If fiat
money were used only in exchange for fiat things, no great harm would
be done, except the loss of time involved in a transaction so utterly idle.
No serious calamity would follow the trading of fiat dollars for fiat bread
or fiat clothes, but the difficulty would be that ultimately some one would
get hungry or cold, would clamor for the real article, and then the trouble
would begin. Any association of gentlemen who desire it may legally
engage day after day, and for as long a period of time as they can hold
out, in trading shadows and exchanging fictions, but nothing but shadows
and fictions will remain at the end of the transaction. The stamp of the
Government upon a piece of paper, 'This is a dollar,' is pure fiction, known
by the whole civilized world to be a fiction, and spurned and rejected as
any other impudent fiction would be. It is utterly impossible to attach any
value to such a fraudulent and lying pretense. The Government may
undertake to force the creditor to accept such a fiction for the reality, but
that is simply adding to the crime of falsehood the additional and higher
crime of robbery ; and all those who clamor for such a scheme of public
robbery, for the purpose of availing themselves of its benefits, are guilty of
the same crime.
"This scheme also has in view professedly the interests of the farmer
and the laboring man. It is impossible to discover how either can be
benefited by this policy. The Government, acting through Congress, may
declare that fiat money shall be legal tender for the payment of all
debts, and may compel the creditor to accept it in satisfaction of the
debt, but it cannot compel the sale of a single thing for such money.
It may rob the citizen of his rights under contracts already existing, but
it can never compel the citizen to make a contract. I venture the asser
tion that the needy farmer or laboring man would never use this money
but once, and that would be in the payment of some debt. No tanner
would make a contract for the sale of his products, to be paid at a future
time in fiat money. No sane man would enter into any business engage
ment for the future, nor make any investments where the returns were
to be reaped in fiat money. The proposition is, as I understand it, to
force this money upon the bondholder. Suppose the scheme succeeds
that far; every bondholder thus swindled would understand perfectly well
the valuelessness of such a currency.
" You may rest assured he would not hold it long. Trade for a time would
be. very active, for the holder of the currency would convert it at the
earliest posible moment into something tangible and real. Houses and
lots, farms, property of all kinds, anything real and tangible, and at almost
any price, would be received in exchange for these deceptive and value
less fiats. Through the various classes of society would this currency pass,
getting nearer and nearer the needy man every day until reaching the
LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
laboring man, who has nothing but his labor to sell, and is obliged to
sell that for any price, and payable in any money he could get or starve,
this worthless money would finally be lodged with him. Be assured the
capitalist would have none of it. Be assured that the ' bloated bond
holder' would have none of it. But capitalist and bondholder would
have the real and tangible, the houses, farms, factories, etc., and the
poor farmer and the laboring man would have all the fiat money they
wanted.
"It is sufficiently obvious to any man who will pause to think even one
moment, that all business prosperity at all permanent in its character must
depend, as a first condition, upon a fixed and stable currency. This cur
rency, being the medium by which all exchanges are made and all values
or prices are determined, must be stable and certain, else business becomes
a mere game of chance, the success of which will depend not upon the
skill of those engaged in it, but upon what the value of the currency in
the future may happen to be. No sane business man would feel like
entering upon any enterprise which required from him the expenditures of
large sums of money in the future, if the actual value of that money might
be very much greater when he was called upon for the payment of the
money than it was at the time he contracted to pay it. No one would
feel safe to contract for the sale or delivery of property in the future at
any fixed number of dollars, if it were at all probable that the dollar in
which he would be paid would be worth much less than the dollar in cir
culation at the time the contract was made.
"Should the laboring man who is now shouting lustily for fiat money
enter into a contract for service for one year on the basis of one dollar
worth 99^ cents, he would forget his politics and his absurd schemes
of finance, and clamorously and noisily proclaim the wickedness of the
bloated capitalist who at the end of the year would pay him in legal-
tender fiats, worth fifty cents on the dollar. Business never has been
for any great length of time successfully prosecuted on the basis of a
shifting and uncertain currency, and one of the most important lessons that
we have to learn is that, whether we are well or ill paid for our work,
depends not upon the number of dollars which we receive, but upon their
value.
"It might, perhaps, be deemed desirable by the new-light economists
to furnish to the laboring man more yards of cloth for a dollar than he
is now able to procure, and a convenient way to bring this about would
be to shorten the yard stick — to reduce it from thirty-six inches to twenty-
four. Under such an arrangement, the dollar would buy more yards of
cloth than before, but I very much doubt whether the purchaser would
have1 more cloth. Let him try the experiment. I assume that three yards
of satinet will make for the able bodied and rotund fiatist a pair of
trousers. I assume that the cloth will cost him three dollars. But under
the new dispensation of twenty-four inches to the yard, he buys three
yards for two dollars. His trousers are made, and the first chilling blast
that he encounters whistles through gaping spaces in those fiat trousers
RESUMPTION OF SPECIE PAYMENTS. 599
and teach him, as no speeches can teach him, that the actual amount
of cloth required to cover and protect him against the cold is determined
not by the number of inches in a yard, but is inexorably fixed by the
length and size of his legs, the swelling proportions of his hips, and that
no act of Congress can change that great physical fact.
"You might as well keep your bushel measure constantly fluctuating,
first shrinking and then expanding, and look for a perfect state of con
fidence in the purchase and sale of those articles measured by the
bushel as to look for confidence when money, the universal measurer, is
constantly changing.
"I can hardly believe that there is any large portion of our people com
mitted to this dishonest scheme. Those who favor it, be assured, are in the
main those whose interest it is to see a general tearing down of all restraints,
a general denial and destruction of all rights of property, who wish to see,
and would have, could they bring it about, universal anarchy and chaos in
place of order, civil and religious liberty, well ordered and decent homes,
the quiet and well ordered provisions for the future, the fireside, the church
and the school-house.
"These men are political tramps, communists and desperadoes — their
argument is the torch, their policy is destruction and waste. They are the
enemies of society, their creed is pillage. To the thousands who have been
deceived and misled by the pretended friendship of these political highway
men, the order-loving people of the nation offer patient reasoning and words
of advice and counsel, but to the trader in public peace and order, who
would imperil for his own base purposes the best and most sacred interests
of our civilization, there is and can be no conciliation. If he confronts the
law and defies it, the law will surely crush him, and .his political future is
political outlawry.
"The celebrated divinity student, the profound theological scholar, and
eminent moralist, and unselfish friend of the laboring man, Benjamin F.
Butler, has adduced a scriptural argument in favor of fiat money. He
reads to a fiat audience in Indianapolis, who probably then heard the narra
tive for the first time, the story of the creation as told in the first chapter
of the book of Genesis. He draws from the fiat of Omnipotence, ' Let there
be light,' and the result, 'there was light,' an argument in favor of a con
gressional fiat, ' Let this be money,' and concludes that the result will follow
that 'it is money.'
"Fresh from the reading of this chapter, I cannot fail to note serious
difficulties which this illustration encounters at the outset. There is, I
respectfully submit, a difference between the power of the Almighty and
the power of Congress. This, I think, will not be disputed. One is omni
potent, the other falls, in many respects, far short of omnipotence. The
Lord can do and has done many things which Congress never has done,
and never can succeed in doing. It is deemed unnecessary to recapitulate
the particulars wherein the power of Congress falls short of omnipotence.
Congress would not attempt to hold the planets in their places, nor direct
the rotation of the seasons, nor make the grass grow, nor cause the tides to
6(DO LIFE OF EMERY A. STORRS.
ebb and flow, by joint resolution or otherwise. Hence it is, that even had
the Almighty in looking upon the dense darkness in which the earth was
enveloped, by a simple declaration, 'Let there be light,' evolved light from
this darkness, it by no means follows that Congress could, under the same
circumstances, by the same fiat, have produced the same miraculous result ;
and it falls very far short of proving that Congress, by simply looking at a
pile of paper and a quantity of ink, and issuing its fiat, 'This is money,'
can make the paper and ink money. The difficulty with such an experiment
is, that as a matter of fact, the material operated upon remains and continues
to be paper and ink after the windy fiat has been issued. Congress effects
no change in the material operated upon by its fiat. The Almighty, looking
upon our planet covered by thick darkness, did not say 'This is light,' but
he said ' Let there be light,' and he set at work those mysterious agencies
which he alone controls, and 'there was light.' A great change had been
effected, and that fiat preceded a fact, while the .proposed Congressional fiat
merely blunderingly asserts a falsehood.
"Back to the inquiry must we come at last — Shall We Resume? To
those who are earnestly solicitous for the preservation and vindication of
the national honor and integrity there can be but one answer.
"Great as our distresses have been, we have not been exceptional
sufferers. All over the world has trade been dull, and all industries
depressed. England, Germany, France, the South American States, even
far off China and Japan, have felt, and are still feeling, the pressure of
hard times. Surely this widespread depression cannot be attributed to the
scarcity of greenbacks nor to the National Banking system. Some other
influences and agencies have been at work, much more general than any
local operations of our national currency, to produce these results. Every
where has there been over-production of all kinds, and everywhere are the
results now being seen.
" Despite our hard lot to-day, look back to 1 861-2 and see how great our
progress has been since that time. Our currency was then in such frightful
condition that the rate of exchange between Chicago and New York was
ten cents on the dollar. Laboring men were paid off in this worthless
currency. Your labor to-day is more remunerative than it then was. Every
product of your farms finds an easier, better market, and commands a higher
price than it then did. You live in better homes, you are better fed and better
clothed than you then were. Your schools are better and there are more of
them, and to secure such a future as every honest man, who relies for his suc
cess upon his own exertions, desires, you need but a stable, steady currency
at all times, and at any time convertible into coin at the option of the holder, so
that your calculations for the future may be founded upon a substantial basis,
and not be made the playthings of selfish political demagogues. My good
friends, who are certain that your condition is grievously bad, and who
are sure that your own country is the worst governed upon the face of
the earth, and that no other peoples suffer as you think you do, when
you go home to-night, take down the map of the world and select some
RESUMPTION OF SPECIE PAYMENTS. OOI
spot upon it for which you would wish to exchange your homes of to-day.
You will find no such place. You have, I am sure, that honorable pride
which all good men have in the good name of the land you live in.
Think how wonderful have been its achievements within less than twenty
years. No slave now breathes upon our soil. Equal rights are guaranteed
to every citizen. Our immense indebtedness has up to this time been
met with a heroism which challenges the admiration of the world. By
hundreds of millions has it been paid, by hundreds of millions of dollars
have the burdens of taxation been lifted from the shoulders of the people.
Steadily has the credit of the nation advanced and strengthened, and as
its credit has advanced, has the interest upon its debt been reduced, and
its bonds are sought for in every money market in the world.
"Observing our wonderful achievements in this direction, that great
Englishman, Mr. Gladstone, says, in speaking of our achievements since
the close of the war : ' More remarkable still was the financial sequel
to this great conflict. The internal taxation for federal purposes, which
before its commencement had been unknown, was raised in obedience to
an exigency of life, so as to exceed every present and every past exam
ple. It pursued and adorned all the transactions of life. The interest
of the American debt grew to be the highest in the world, and the
capital touched £560,000,000. Here was provided for the faith and patience
of the people a touchstone of extreme severity. In England, at the close
of the great French war, the propertied classes, who were supreme in
parliament, at once rebelled against the tory government, and refused to
prolong the income tax even for a single year. We talked big, both
then and now, about the payment of our national debt, but sixty-three
years have now elapsed, all of them except two called years of peace,
and we have reduced the huge total by about one-ninth; that is to say,
by little over £100,000,000, or scarcely more than £1,500,000 per year.
This is the conduct of a state elaborately digested into orders and degrees
famed for wisdom and forethought, and consolidated by a long experience.
But America continued long to bear on her unaccustomed and still smart
ing shoulders the burden of the war taxation. In twelve years she has
reduced her debt £158,000,000, or at the rate of £13,000,000 for every
year. In each twelve months she has done what we did in eight years ;
her self-command, self3denial and wise forethought for the future have
been, to say the least, eight-fold ours. These are facts which redound
greatly to her honor, and the historian will record with surprise that an
enfranchised nation tolerated burdens which in this country a selected
class, possessed of the representation, did not dare to face, and that the
most unmitigated democracy known to the annals of the world resolutely
reduced, at its own cost, prospective liabilities of the state which the aris
tocratic and plutocratic and monarchial government of the United Kingdom
has been contented ignobly to hand over to posterity.'
"Are you not, as citizens, proud to hear such words as these, coining
from such an exalted source, spoken of your country? Are you not
prouder still to know that they are true, and prouder still in the con-
6O2 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORRS.
sciousness that your patience, your self-denial, your wise forethought, have
made them true? You would not, by an act of dishonor, dim the bright
ness of this shining record. Greater than all our material achievements
are such triumphs as these, for they prove that the men of the country
are 'greater than the mere things that they produce.' How wild the
efforts to repeal the resumption law are, must be apparent at a glance.
All efforts in that direction will prove unavailing; for by the first day
of January, 1879, specie payments will be resumed ; the fact will be ac
complished and the fact cannot well be repealed. Time runs too fast.
No bill repealing the resumption law can possibly ripen into law before
January I, 1879. Should such a bill pass both Houses of Congress,
which it cannot do, it would be sure to encounter the Presidential veto,
and there it would die.
" The most that can be accomplished is, by these wild threats of
agrarian legislation to so seriously disturb all confidence in the future as
to paralyze all business undertakings. To-day we are within half a cent
of gold. That narrow isthmus once passed, and there comes into circu
lation these millions of dollars in coin, which a depreciated currency has
for so many years forced and driven out of circulation. Our journey
through this wilderness has been long and wearisome, and full of suffer
ing. Many have despaired on the way — have longed for the flesh-pots
of the old times — have worshiped the old images of the days of slavery.
But the great body of the nation have not despaired. They stand now
on Pisgah's heights and see the glorious landscape of the promised land
spread out before them. Its verdurous and smiling fields beckon them
on, and although the heights on which they stand may be rocky and
barren, they know that the fields of plenty are but a few days from
them. Who would return ? Who propose to retraverse the deserts across
which they have so toilsomely traveled, to find at the end of their re
turning journey, should they ever live to reach it, the lice and frogs of
Egypt. No pillars of cloud by day, and of fire by night, will guide
them on their backward course. No manna is furnished the starving
multitudes upon a return trip. No, my friends. The journey must be
finished, and girding ourselves for one more effort, losing nothing of the
heroic patience and fortitude which for these long years you have exhibited,
we shall reach the promised land at last.
" In this emergency the duty of the Republican party is plain, its course
is clear. As dearly as we love the banner which has floated over it, as
sacred as are the associations clustered about it, we would tear that banner
into shreds, rather than upon its stainless folds there should be one spot of
dishonor.
"Whatever others may do, or however high the tide may rise, when the
honor and good faith of the nation are imperiled as they are to-day, we
must stand firm. We lower our standard never an inch. We conciliate no
enemies of the national faith. We make no bargains or compromises with
those who would repudiate our national obligations.
" Whatever of defeats we may suffer by a resolute adherence to the right,
RESUMPTION OF SPECIE PAYMENTS. 603
all such disasters will be temporary, but our triumph when it does come will
be enduring.
"We shall not fail. The sober second thought of the people will not fail
us. The instructed and enlightened judgment of the country will be with
us ; and however dark and gloomy the skies may now look, they will as
surely brighten, as the sun succeeds the night."
For historical research, keen penetration into the underlying
facts of political economy, and logical arrangement of the princi
ple involved, this production of Mr. Storrs has justly been assigned
a very high rank.
CHAPTER XXXI.
VARIOUS PUBLIC UTTERANCES.
LETTER TO SENATOR M'PHERSON ON THE SILVER BILL — AMERICAN COM
MERCE, 1878 — THE GROWTH OF CHICAGO — THE PURITY OF THE BENCH
AND BAR— THE BLODGETT INVESTIGATION— LAWYERS AS LEGISLATORS-
GRANT FOR A THIRD TERM— MR. STORRS* OPINION OF PRESIDENT HAYES
— A BRIC-A-BRAC CABINET.
WE have seen that Mr. Storrs was strenuously opposed to
the inflation of the currency, and he was equally op
posed to the proposition then before Congress for an unlimited
coinage of silver dollars. On this subject he. wrote to Senator
M'Pherson of New Jersey, between whom and himself there had
existed for some years a close personal friendship.
" February 21, 1878.
"MY DEAR SENATOR,
"I have read with a great deal of pleasure the synopsis of your speech
in the Senate on the silver bill, and only regretted that I could not have
the speech complete.
"The West is very far from being unanimously in favor of that bill, and
although it would probably be fair to say that a very decided majority
favors it, yet the minority has hardly been heard from, and is much more
numerous and powerful than one might suspect.
" However, I suppose we are bound to have it as a law, and then we
shall all be compelled to learn, once more, the bitter but very useful
lesson, that debts cannot be paid and wealth cannot be created by an
Act of Congress. . . "Yours very truly,
" EMERY A.- STORRS."
In November 1878, Mr. Storrs was chosen as the representa
tive speaker of the city of Chicago to welcome a great national
and international commercial convention, which held its sessions
in Farwell hall, and which was attended by the most prominent
604
VARIOUS PUBLIC UTTERANCES. 605
business men of the United States and Canada. In delivering
the address of welcome on behalf of the citizens of Chicago, Mr.
Storrs said:
"This convention possesses a profound significance, from the character
of the delegates who are here assembled, and from the commanding
importance of the subject which you are convened to discuss and consider,
— ' The promotion of American commerce, and to suggest the best means
of extending our trade with foreign countries in North and South
America.'
"It would be bold and presumptuous in me, speaking to men whose
names have for years been closely identified with great commercial
enterprises, to attempt to forecast the line which your discussions will
take, or to suggest the methods by which our trade may be extended.
I may, however, be justified in saying that both the time when and the
place where this convention assembles are eminently favorable to the
intelligent discussion of these great topics.
"We stand, as a people, I firmly believe, upon the threshold of
returning prosperity. We have practically emerged from the embarrass
ments and troubles which beset all business enterprises conducted by a
depreciated fluctuating currency. The burdens of our annual taxation
have been lessened by millions of dollars. We have paid in full the
severe penalties of fictitious prices, unreal values, and an unnaturally,
stimulated production. The severe training to which we have been
subjected has reduced us in flesh, but strengthened us in muscle and
endurance; and looking to the future, seeing promise in it, we are pre
pared to lift to its feet the nearly prostrate form of American commerce,
and carry it to that high position that its sails shall whiten every sea,
and its flag shall float, and the product of our industry be found, in
every port.
"The time has long since passed when a nation whose pursuits are ex
clusively agricultural can long sustain itself. To-day a market is as
necessary to the farmer as his farm, and without the one the other is
worthless. Every new market is a positive addition to his wealth, and
every shortening of lines to reach those markets benefits directly every
conceivable form of industry. We have learned that it quite impossible
for us to cut ourselves off from the -rest of the world, or to regard them
as enemies. It is much more profitable and infinitely more pleasant to
trade with them than to fight with them ; and by what methods new-
customers are to be secured, and new markets gained, will form one of
the leading topics for your deliberations. Your purpose is not, as I un
derstand it, to overcome natural disadvantages, but to avail yourselves of
those great natural and geographical advantages which we clearly possess.
You prefer to ship your goods to Rio Janeiro by some more direct route
than via Liverpool, and when your butter or cheese reaches a South
American port you prefer that it should carry the brand of the eagle
rather than the trade mark of the lion and the unicorn. It is ordained
606 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
that we are to possess this continent, and we will not fully and com
pletely do this unless from ocean to ocean we bind it together with bands
of steel and iron. From the Golden Gate, on the Pacific slope, we look
across that peaceful sea to the far-off China, opening her gates to our
commerce. We cannot stretch out bands of iron across these waters, but
we may surely devise some means by which our ships, sailing under our
own flag, shall traverse them.
"Thirty years ago a great convention assembled in this city to discuss
the question of river and harbor improvements. Chicago was then scarcely
more than a village, but the influence of that convention was felt through
out the whole country. Since that time the village has become a great
metropolis, the very heart and centre of a colossal commerce. Commerce
knows no sects, and is limited to no narrow neighborhoods. It goes wher
ever a human want is to be supplied or a taste gratified, and civilizes as
it goes. A commercial people are of necessity a liberal people, and no
agency converts enemies into friends so surely as the potent agencies of
commercial intercourse. It is the great reconciler and conciliator, for where
commercial interests are identical, there can be no differences which may
not be reconciled. You are met in a great city of the mighty Northwest.
Its crowded streets, its palatial business houses, its busy marts, its cease
less and unwearied activity and enterprise, its vast and far-reaching rail
road interests, the chain of inland seas on whose bosom floats a v'ast com
merce, and at the head of which this city sits like a queen, all presage for
it a future which shall be the marvel of the world. To this city, its hos
pitalities, its homes, and to all the lessons which its rapid growth teaches,
you are as the representatives of not only a national but a world-wide
commerce, most heartily welcomed."
About this time the New York GrapJiic was publishing a
series of articles on the leading cities of the West, illustrated
with pictures of the principal public buildings; and in March 1879
Mr. Storrs was requested to contribute an article on the growth
of the Chicago live-stock trade, to accompany a sketch of the
Union stock yards. He did so in a very readable and interest
ing article, of which the following are the introductory and con
cluding portions:
"Chicago is not an art centre; it has no great picture galleries, no great
public libraries. Perhaps it would be safe to say it has no great pictures.
It has no great public buildings ; it has not even a restaurant, it has no
opera house, it has hardly a first-class public hall ; but it has miles and
miles of magnificent business buildings ; it has an inland sea lying to the
east of it, whose shining waters are before me now ; it has running up into
the heart of the city a muddy, wretched stream which its people call a
river, but on whose stagnant waters floats a vast commerce; it is the very
kingdom of the practical ; it is an elysium for results ; it is the empire of
corn, and wheat, and steers, and hogs, and lumber, — not very beautiful nor
VARIOUS PUBLIC UTTERANCES. 6O/
very poetic creations, but exceedingly useful to the natural man. I have
been here long enough to rather take on some of the characteristics of
Chicago. I like a big thing — a power — no matter how crude or raw it may
be in its exhibition. Indeed, so saturated am I with the Chicago spirit that
I would be glad to shake hands with the force of gravity if it could take
material form. I would go farther to see the force of gravity than I would
to see Hayes' or Evarts, or any other artist.
"These qualities of Chicago which I have mentioned are after all more
worthy of admiration than the more pretentious clatter of smaller cities
about what they call their culture. I am not saying that there are not literary
men and women in Chicago, — indeed, the city abounds with them, — but
their literature and their art and their music are secondary. They are kept
well in hand, and are attended to after business hours. I venture to say
that such a thing as a man of leisure cannot be found in Chicago. It
would be considered discreditable to be a man of leisure. There are no
bloated bondholders in Chicago, although there are very rich men ; but the
hardest working men I ever met anywhere are the rich men of the city of
Chicago. They know no leisure ; they seek no leisure. . .
"No one can long remain in this Western metropolis without actually
feeling its growth. The time is not far distant when its steers and hogs, its
corn and wheat and lumber shall return to it in rather finer and more
aesthetic forms; and from the' stockyards and pork-packing establishments
there are sure to come some day great libraries and splendid galleries, and
music and the drama will find from these exceedingly practical and unro-
mantic sources their best temples furnished, and shall draw from them their
largest and most liberal encouragement. The men of Chicago are to-day
engaged in rearing a colossal commerce and in transferring to the valley
of the Mississippi the seat of empire. Its palatial homes can now be counted
by hundreds, and from the ashes of the great fire has risen, so far as its
business buildings and private residences are concerned, one of the most
beautiful cities on the continent."
For the first time in the history of Illinois, one of its Judges
was the subject of a Congressional investigation in the spring of
1879. Some of the younger members of the bar practising
before him in the United States Court for the Northern District
of Illinois complained of what they regarded as partiality on the
part of Judge Blodgett towards older and more influential lawyers,
and his aggressive bearing toward themselves. A feeling of
hostility to the Judge had been growing for some time in the
breasts of these gentlemen, and in the fall of 1878 one of them,
in excepting to the Judge's charge, used language in the presence
of the jury which Judge Blodgett regarded as disrespectful, and
as amounting to contempt of court. He fined the offending
attorney $100, and committed him to custody until it was paid.
608 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
Later in the day the senior partner of the firm apologized and
obtained the attorney's discharge. This action of Judge Blodgett
fanned the smouldering flame, which broke out in communications
to the press reflecting upon the Judge. He thereupon demanded
an investigation of his judicial conduct, and a committee of the
House of Representatives, consisting of Messrs. Proctor Knott
Culberson, and Lapham, was sent to Chicago to hear evidence,
the inquiry resulting in a vindication of the Judge, his accusers
failing to show anything to impeach his integrity, and the witnesses*
on Judge Blodgett's behalf preponderating overwhelmingly, both
in numbers and standing at the Chicago bar.
Mr. Storrs was in New York while the investigation was pend
ing, and a representative of the Graphic interviewed him on the
subject. Mr. Storrs was at all times accessible to the gentlemen
of the press, and except when he saw- occasion for reticence,
always communicated freely any information in his power to
give. The published reports of interviews with Storrs were inva
riably read with attention, for he was regarded as an oracle on
political affairs, and on all questions stated his views clearly and
incisively, and often in a witty and epigrammatic way. His
opinion of the Blodgett case was thus stated:
"I am expressing the opinion of at least nineteen-twentieths of the mem
bers of the Western bar when I say that no case will be made against
Judge Blodgett which will impeach his integrity and uprightness as a judge,
or come within gunshot of being sustained. He is a man of great ability,
of remarkable clearness and quickness of perception, of very positive opin
ions, of a somewhat aggressive character, but I think of perfect rectitude.
"1 have no idea that the result of an investigation of Judge Blodgett will
be other than highly beneficial to himself and satisfactory to his friends.
"The air has been filled with these vague charges for some time. The
course which Judge Blodgett has finally determined to pursue is by all
odds the wisest. I think that left to himself he would have taken that
course a month ago. Indeed, I may say that after these charges had
once been proclaimed through the press, an investigation was inevitable —
the sooner it came the better. The purity of a judge cannot be vicariously
defended. The party assailed must do the defending, and that instantly
and vigorously; and we were all delighted when Judge Blodgett demanded
the investigation, and his best friends are insisting that it be most search
ing and exhausting.
"Judge Blodgett does not possess all the virtues. You must remember
that he is burdened with an immense and trying business. He performs
more duties than any other two District Judges in the United States. He is
a man of somewhat feeble constitution. He travels between eighty and
VARIOUS PUBLIC UTTERANCES. 609
ninety miles every day in going to and returning from court. He works
every night from eleven to twelve o'clock. The profession of law is a very
noble one, but it is the last in the world that a naturally stupid or
careless man should follow, and I hope no census will be taken of that
class of lawyers. Judge Blodgett is exceedingly quick and clear, and with
his strong, sound judgment he has no patience with a blundering prac
titioner. He has suppressed large numbers of such men and takes but
little time to do it. The natural man, although he be a lawyer, does not
like to be suppressed. When he gets out of doors he makes a noise,
and if he has been pretty badly beaten takes his case before a somewhat
easier judge on the sidewalk. Many cases have been appealed from
judge Blodgett to the sidewalk, and the gentlemen appealing them had
better luck there than in the courts. Judge Blodgett has some infirmities
of temper, of which he is as conscious as any one. He is a very kind-
hearted man. But in the morning after being badgered in Chambers,
bothered with a bad digestion, meeting the crowd of lawyers as he comes
upon the bench with a docket before him which seems interminable, it
is not very surprising that he should be unstrung at times. But the ma
jority of those who have been brought into relations with Judge Blodgett
have sense enough to know that while such incivility may have annoyed
them at the time, behind it all was the able and upright judge and the
honorable man. The feeling entertained by them is one of sympathy for
the physical infirmities of the man coupled with admiration of his mind.
I wish to note right here another test which, among lawyers, is regarded
as very decisive as to the fairness of a judge — the preparation of bills
of exceptions for appeals to the Supreme Court. I have had some ex
perience in that matter with Judge Blodgett. There never was a fairer
man. He will give the complaining lawyer as fair a bill of exceptions
as any one can ask for. As far as my experience goes he is entirely
willing to furnish every facility for a very complete review of his opinions and
abundant chance to reverse them if they are wrong. He decides against
you positively. When you go up he treats you fairly and accepts his defeat
gracefully."
The conversation broadened out into a discussion of lawyers in
general. "From an experience with the Chicago bar of nearly
twenty years," he said, "it would be difficult, in my judgment, to
find a superior lot of men to deal with, and I am pretty well
acquainted with lawyers throughout the United States. It is an
industrious bar, a painstaking bar, as a whole. Of course some
fellows jumped in when the fences were down, but few men who
are members of the Chicago bar can be called disreputable."
As to the Chicago practice in divorce cases, he said: — "The
divorce business in the city of Chicago is conducted in as legiti
mate a way and as carefully as in any State in the Union. The
39
6lO LIFE OF EME-R-Y A. STORKS.
witnesses must be heard in open court and testimony cannot be
taken before a Master in Chancery, or a referee. The Judges
themselves are exceedingly jealous in hearing the evidence, and
in many instances after the counsel had dropped the witnesses
have examined them again most searchingly themselves. Of
course it is very difficult to guard against perjury; but a fraudu
lent divorce cannot be procured in Illinois without deliberate,
wilful, corrupt perjury committed in open court. We are there
fore very little troubled with divorce 'shysters.'
The interviewer asked Mr. Storrs' opinion as to the undue
preponderance of lawyers in the State Legislatures and in Con
gress.
" I suppose that these lawyers were elected by majorities, and I think
the majority should rule."
"That is an ingenious but scarcely a candid answer."
"I will be entirely candid with you. I believe that, taken all in all,
the lawyer makes a better legislator than the merchant, the banker or
the farmer. I think he has fewer prejudices and more knowledge. I am
no believer in our reaching the millennium through the predominance of
the business man in politics. You hear a good deal nowadays of putting
the Treasury Department and other Governmental offices under the charge
of business men who have accumulated money. You cannot put your
finger on the name of any great national financier in this country who
has been a man of wealth. Alexander Hamilton stands at the head of
all that class of men, and while Secretary of the Treasury he sent on
one day letters to various parties asking for the loan of $20. Gallatin
was not a rich man. Hamilton was a lawyer; Salmon P. Chase was a
lawyer ; he never sold any dry goods, nor did he epgage in any mer
cantile business. It is almost proverbial that our greatest national finan
ciers have been the poorest men. A national financier differs from the
private merchant, whose essential quality is profitable management of his
money and who must accumulate to meet the requirements of his busi
ness. A government has no business to accumulate any larger sums of
money than it needs to pay its expenses. Accumulation by the govern
ment means just that amount of additional taxation upon the people. 1
think the trouble with the lawyers is that in many instances they do not
know enough law to be good lawyers and know a little too much law
to be good business men. I hope you will consider this as candid.
"It is alleged in support of this opposition to a predominance of lawyers
in legislative bodies that the natural tendency of the legal mind is not
towards clearness and accuracy of legislation, and that, whether consciously
or unconsciously, they are inclined to frame laws which admit of two inter
pretations, so that litigation is provoked. Is this true?"
" No, it is not true ; no lawyer worthy of the name would ever frame a
VARIOUS PUBLIC UTTERANCES. 6 1 I
statute with a view to provoke future litigation any more than he would try
to involve his client in further litigation. I can hardly conceive that possi
ble. There may be some difficulty such as you suggest. We find, for
instance, a good deal of difficulty in redundant forms of pleading, but those
that blunder through* ignorance of correct modes of pleading do not make
money by it. This is not the fault of the law, which cannot be held res
ponsible for the dunces that fail to follow it. Clear heads in any profession
in this world are the exception, and such a facility of expression as will
exclude every other meaning excepting the one intended is a faculty pos
sessed by few mortals. I do not expect to live long enough to see the day
when there will be such general accuracy of statement in editorials,
speeches, legal opinions or statutes as to avoid all chance of misunder
standing or misconstruction ; yet I think the tendency of legal training is
towards accuracy of statement, and I believe that the good lawyer can put
an idea upon paper mort clearly and precisely than a good mechanic,
good merchant, or good farmer. But a clear-headed farmer is by all means
preferable to a fuddled-headed lawyer."
" Was the convention which framed the present new Constitution of Illi
nois largely composed of lawyers ? ' '
"Very largely. I am not able to give the exact proportion, save that
there was a preponderating legal element."
"Has the practical working of that Constitution been successful?"
" It has ; indeed, I may say almost entirely so. There is perhaps a
little too much legislation in that Constitution. That is the fault of nearly
all our constitutions; they deal rather too minutely with details."
" Do you not think that as a rule justice is more speedy and that the
general welfare is better protected in a country like England, where
there is no written constitution, than here where we are hampered by
cast-iron organic laws?"
"You submit to me one of the most difficult of all questions. I think
I am rather inclined to uphold the superiority of justice in this country
over that in England. But I very much doubt what the final outcome
of written constitutions will be. We are growing out of them and adding
to them constantly, while the English Constitution is made by the people
every day they live. Our Constitution, however, although written, is made
and altered by the people. The first thing we did with it was to violate
it by the purchase of Louisiana and Florida. Hence the absurdity of
placing a strict construction on it."
"Is there not an undue multiplicity of tribunals?"
"I think so, especially in New York. But it is different in Illinois;
no Circuit Judge there interferes with another. I think that the writ of
injunction is much more carefully respected in Illinois than in New York.
Such a thing as one Judge granting a stay of proceedings in matters
pending before another Judge would not be tolerated there."
Finally the conversation drifted round to politics, and Mr.
Storrs pronounced emphatically for General Grant for a third
6l2 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
term, and expressed with entire openness and frankness his opin
ion of President Hayes:
"Mr Storrs, in the course of our conversation you have incidentally
mentioned General Grant. What- is the feeling in Illinois in regard to the
third term?"
" If a convention of the Republicans were to be held to-morrow for the
purpose of selecting a candidate for the Presidency in 1880, I think Gen
eral Grant would receive forty-nine out of every fifty votes. This feeling
extends throughout Illinois and the entire West."
"To what do you attribute this feeling?"
"To Grant's character and the confidence that under his administration
every citizen will be protected in his rights."
"The accusations which have so freely been made against him have, I
suppose, worn themselves out?"
"Yes."
"Is there not a feeling of disappointment in the Republican party with
respect to President Hayes?"
" Yes ; decidedly."
"What is the reason for it?"
" The impression is that there is a general lack of firmness — a general
tenderfootedness and goody-goodiness without anything specific about it one
way or the other, a disposition to swap old friends for old enemies: an idea
that he is not wholly sincere ; that he will blunder and founder — in other
words, that you can't always tell."
"And as respects the Cabinet, Mr. Storrs?"
" The Cabinet is regarded among Republicans as a collection something
like those which are gathered together by the societies for the cultivation
of decorative art, some things passably tolerable, some things curious, but
among the bric-a-brac a good deal of rubbish. I think Sherman is regarded
as a strong man by the Republicans, McCrary is certainly a good Repub
lican. Fifty years ago Secretary Thompson was a well-known man. As
to Mr. Schurz I refer you to General Sheridan."
"What is the opinion as to the legality of Mr. Hayes' election?"
"I think the Republicans believe that he was fairly elected President.
They believe that with a fair election in those States which were decisive
there never would have been a question or the necessity for a count. The
Republicans of the West believe in the Constitutional amendments and in
civil rights ; and I think they believe there were at least five States in which
majorities were disfranchised. They are in favor of making a hot fight
until this state of things shall cease ; and for that purpose a stalwart, mas
culine man is needed, marching to music that shall not come from flutes
and to old tunes which do not include 'The Shining Shore.' We shall
certainly succeed with such a man. I believe that with a President in
dead earnest the Constitutional amendments and the laws in furtherance of
them will be carried out to the letter in both the North and the South."
"Is it not possible that the former Republican majorities in the South
VARIOUS PUBLIC UTTERANCES. 613
have been gained over to the side of the Democrats by motives of self
interest ?' '
" I don't think that is possible. Think of South Carolina being Demo
cratic ! All the evidence is the other way. I don't think that Tilden's
Literary Bureau has sufficient ability to convert the colored people. The
negro is a Republican to-day. He can never forget that he owes his
emancipation to the Republican party."
"You said that the platform of the Republican party in 1880 is to be
composed of two principles — honest money and an honest ballot — do you
mean by honest money what we have now ? ' '
"Yes; I mean a currency redeemable in coin at the option of the
holder, in other words such a currency as the majorities in New York
and Illinois voted for at the last election."
"Within the last few days several Western gentlemen of prominence
and high intelligence, in conversation with me, have insisted that the
fiat money cause, so far from showing any weakness was stronger than
ever, was making demonstrations of its strength and was certain of finally
winning its way to supremacy."
"I don't think there is a particle of foundation for these assertions. I
think I can speak for Illinois with confidence, and for Michigan with some
knowledge of its people, and also of Iowa and Wisconsin. You never will
live to %ee the day when fiat money will be as strong as it showed itself
when so overwhelmingly defeated last fall. I think there is a strange mis
take about these financial heresies, and I believe that we are now on the
road, with the aid of a fixed and stable currency, to unexampled prosperity.
Fiat money is a craze. I think it is dead at least for this generation."
" Resumption being assured and successful, as you believe it will be, will
not Secretary Sherman receive the credit for it, and will not that make him
a very formidable candidate for the Republican nomination even as against
Grant?"
"Secretary Sherman will undoubtedly receive very great credit, but
that will not make him President and it won't even make him a candi
date in the convention. I believe the renomination of Grant in 1880 is
fore-ordained. Grant combines so many qualities that the people admire.
His achievements are so positive and real, and he has carried himself
while abroad with such perfect poise, has shown a judgment under very-
trying circumstances so much wiser than even his best friends expected,
that he will come back here with a power which will make him Presi
dent for a third term in spite of all attempted opposition."
" Having re-elected him in 1880 what will stand in the way of the
people reinstating him indefinitely?"
" I know of no law which would prevent the people of the United
States from re-electing a President as many times as they choose. But
there is plenty of time to talk about that when he shall have served his
third term."
CHAPTER XXXII.
CHICAGO CITY MISGOVERNMENT.
THE CHICAGO MUNICIPAL ELECTION OF 1879— MR. STORKS AT A MASS-
MEETING OF REPUBLICANS IN FARWELL HALL OPPOSES HANDING OVER
THE CITY GOVERNMENT TO THE DEMOCRATS — COMPARISON OF REPUBLICAN
AND DEMOCRATIC MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT — THE ELECTION LAWS, WHICH
THE BRIGADIERS IN CONGRESS SOUGHT TO REPEAL — CARTER HARRISON
ELECTED.
THE misgovernment of the municipal affairs of the city of
Chicago, which it was fondly hoped would be cured by
the reorganization of the city government under the general law
in 1875, was not corrected by that measure. The Constitution
of the State of Illinois, adopted in 1870, provided that all cities
in the State might organize under a general charter or law, and
that if any city so decided, an election should take place on the
1 8th of April. Mr. Colvin had been elected Mayor of Chicago
on the Democratic ticket in 1873, for two years, his term expir
ing in December 1875. The new charter was adopted at the
election held in April 1875, of which mention has already been
made. Under it the Mayor was to hold office two years, and a
new set of aldermen were to be chosen at the next election. A
conspiracy was formed by Mayor Colvin and the existing Coun
cil to extend the power of the sitting aldermen one year and
that of Colvin for two years; and the simple device by which
this was done was the calling of the election at which the adop
tion of the new charter was to be voted upon for the 230! of
April, or five days after the election should have been held if
the charter had been in force. To ensure this end the existing
registration law was repealed by a bill smuggled through the
Illinois legislature, and then, all safeguards being removed, the
614
CHICAGO CITY MISGOVERNMENT. 615
election adopting the new charter was carried by ballot-box
stuffing and fraud.
On the 1 8th of April, 1876, there was an election for alder
men, and the old leeches \vere shaken off; but, in order to give
Colvin still another year of the Mayoralty, the call for the election
designedly omitted to state that a vote would be taken for
Mayor as well; and Mr. Colvin proposed to "hold over" in
spite of the people. The citizens of Chicago, indignant at this
outrageous piece of usurpation, cast 30,000 votes out of a total
vote of 33,000 for Hon. Thomas Moyne as Mayor. For some
days the extraordinary spectacle was witnessed in Chicago of
a city government with two heads, each having officers of his
own appointing, and each seeking to thwart and circumvent the
other. The courts soon put an end to the muddle by deciding
that the new Council must call a new election, giving the
notice which the law required, and in July 1876 Hon. Monroe
Heath was elected, and held the office down to April 1879.
Mr. Heath was a Republican, and under his administration,
the yearly appropriation for municipal purposes, which under
Colvin in 1875 was over ^ve millions of dollars, in 1878 had
been reduced to three millions and a half. The credit of the
city, which had been at a disgracefully low ebb through Demo
cratic peculation and extravagance, was restored in every com
mercial centre in the world. The Democratic supervisor of the
southern division of the city had been counted in by ballot-
box frauds, but the opposition of the citizens was so great that
he was obliged to retire, and Hon. ' Robert T. Lincoln, afterwards
Secretary of War in President Garfield's cabinet, was elected in
his place.
Under a Republican municipal government, the city of Chi
cago had been prospering, and but for the supineness of the
Republican citizens might have still continued to prosper. But
in 1879 the Democrats made another determined effort to cap
ture the city administration, and put forward as their candidate
Carter H. Harrison, who had for two years previously been repre
senting a district of the city in Congress. The Republicans
nominated Mr. A. H. Wright, a member of the Chicago Board
of Trade. A large mass-meeting was held in Farwell hall, at
which Hr. Storrs delivered a stirring speech, reminding his aud-
6l6 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
ience of the danger of handing over to the Democrats the muni
cipal power of Chicago, especially in view of the attempts being
made by a Democratic Congress to repeal the election laws,
which had been passed as a necessary safeguard of Republicans
at the South, and of decent citizens everywhere, to prevent their
being driven away from the polls. He spoke substantially as
follows :
"The old call is made upon the old Puritan element of this great city
of Illinois, which has been reared on the shores of this lake, — probably the
grandest achievement in the way of a commercial city that this world has
ever witnessed. This City of Chicago is, above all things, and beyond all
things, a free city, and it is the outgrowth of the spirit of free men. To-day
the free' men of the City of Chicago are coolly asked to surrender its in
terests ; to transfer them from the hands of • the Republican party, in
whose custody for the last three years they have been, into the
hands of the Democracy. I decline to accept the invitation and I
am constrained to think that this vast audience that face me to-night
are quite prepared to agree with me in that declaration. The magnifi
cent results in the administration of the last three years are not the work
of any Reform Common Council, gentlemen. They are the work of a
Republican Mayor and a Republican Common Council. [Applause.] I
know of but one reform party in the country. It is the Republican
party. [Applause.] I know of but one party anywhere on the face of
the habitable globe that is the incarnation of wickedness and all that is
infernal in politics, and it is the Democratic party. [Laughter and ap
plause.] There are other bad parties, but the Democratic party is bad
ness itself. There is the same difference between the Democratic party
and a bad party that there is between having the small-pox and being the
small-pox. Many a very decent fellow has had the small-pox and has
been pitied for it. [Laughter.] The small-pox is indescribably and unan
imously bad. [Renewed laughter.] This party, which has had a univer
sity for training in political heresies and demagogism for the last thirty
years ; this party which is ' an organized appetite ; ' this party which is
an embodied hunger, comes to the front and looks to a well-supplied
table, and, with dry juices from all the corners of its mouth, says it
wants no food, but it would like to appropriate the table. [Great laugh
ter.] I don't wish to speak, and I think I have not spoken, disrespect
fully of the Democratic party. I am resolved that I shall say nothing
uncivil of its candidate, Mr. Harrison, — probably one of the most distin
guished orators on the continent. In his rhetoric there is nothing mere
tricious. It is hard, solid, relentless logic, — is n't it? [Derisive laughter.]
He is a politician without ambition, and a citizen without guile, is Carter
Harrison. [More laughter.]
"They have announced an exceedingly curious programme. They have
declared that in this canvass they are not going to discuss politics of
CHICAGO CITY MISGOVERNMENT. 6i;
any kind ; they shall have nothing to say about national rights and noth
ing to say about municipal affairs. If I were a member of the Demo
cratic party, I should feel the same way. [Laughter.] If 1 belonged to
a political organization whose past was as foul and leprous as its, I would
say 'For God's sake, fellow-citizens, keep your eyes to the front; let
us say nothing about its past career, but bury it as soon as possible
out of existence.' [Laughter.] Carter Harrison proposes to conduct the
campaign upon merely personal issues. I desire to announce here and now
that I am as much in favor of A. M. Wright because of the men opposed
to him as for any other consideration ; and I am as much opposed to
Carter Harrison because of the men that are for him as for anything else.
[Laughter.]
" From the course which this canvass has taken thus far, it has become very
evident that a defence of the Republican administration of the affairs of
this city since Monroe Heath assumed the office of Mayor is entirely unnec
essary ; for, as eagerly as the Democratic party covet the possession of
political power in this city, as important as they deem it with reference to
the great contest upon which we are to enter in 1880, as unscrupulous as
they have been and would be in the use of means to secure the political
power of this city, I have yet to learn that any attack has been made upon
the Republican administration of our municipal affairs. This leaves our
municipal history, so far as we are concerned as a body, unquestioned and
unchallenged. So satisfactory has it been, and so gratifying have its results
been, that the approval and indorsement which it meets is well-nigh unan
imous. Nevertheless, as the people of the City of Chicago are now asked
to change that administration from one party to another, — from the party
whose administration has been so successful that no one challenges or ques
tions it, — it is well for us to remember, before we answer that request, pre
cisely what the Republican party has done for the City of Chicago within
the last four years. It found our city grievously burdened with debt and
with a shattered credit, with its paper under protest, with millions of its
taxes uncollected, with its police force demoralized, and with crime running
rampant. It has changed all this ; it has reduced its appropriations to such
an extent that for 1878 they were $1,345,048.49 less than they were in
1875-
"During that time our bonded debt has been reduced $400,000. The
revenue warrants issued by the Republican administration in 1876 are paid
in full ; those issued in 1877 are all paid but a triflmg sum. Our police
force was never in better shape; our Fire Department is nearly perfect in
organization and efficiency ; the laws are efficiently administered ; our credit
stands second to that of no city in the nation; and under the wise adminis
tration of Mayor Heath we have reached a condition of solid prosperity
which challenges the admiration and the gratitude of every good citizen.
There is no reason to suppose that this policy, so fruitful of good and flat
tering results, will be changed if the Republican party is continued, even
though A. M. Wright fill the place which has been so worthily occupied by
Monroe Heath. It is but fair that we should expect the Republican party
6l8 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
in the future to pursue the same line of policy which it has adopted and
pursued in the past ; and there is no ordinarily sane or intelligent man who,
confining his observations to our city boundaries, can look upon the transfer
of this power from the Republican party to the Democratic party, with its
recognized hunger and greed for plunder, without the greatest and most
serious apprehensions. I trust that our people will pause very long before
they decide to make such a change ; for no man can state an intelligent
reason affecting the local interests of this city why such a change should be
made.
"Carter Harrison knows very well that he asks to be elected Mayor of
Chicago for a purpose ; and for a purpose reaching far beyond the mere
gratification of his personal vanity in holding that high office. He asks to
be elected Mayor of Chicago in order that his past political record may be
approved by the people of the great city in which he lives ; and you may
reason and refine upon it as you will, his election as Mayor of Chicago is
an indorsement and ratification of his political course, What, then, are the
objections to Carter Harrison, so far as the indorsement of his political opin
ions, policy and conduct is concerned ? They are so numerous that the time
alloted to me to-night would hardly enable me to state them. He is, first
and foremost, a Democrat; and at this time, in the midst of the perils
which now surround us, that, to any patriotic citizen, Republican or otherwise,
ought to be sufficient. But he is a Bourbon Democrat, who has drawn his polit
ical lessons from sectional fountains, and in whom the belief of State Rights and
State Sovereignty is so thoroughly ingrained that nothing on earth can ever
eradicate it from him. He opposed the war for the preservation of the
Union, and remained with and was an active member of the party which
opposed it. He denied the right of this Union to save itself by a forcible
putting down of armed rebellion against its rightful power and authority ;
and he was a consistent, and vigorous member of the party which com
mitted itself to that doctrine. He denied the right of coercion; he opposed
the organization of armies for the salvation of the Union; he opposed the
conscription law ; he opposed the draft ; he opposed during the war, and so
did the party to which he belonged, every single measure which looked to
its successful prosecution; he opposed, and so did the party of which he
was a member, the creation 'of our national currency ; he opposed the
greenback ; he opposed the National bank note ; indeed down to the close
of the war, Carter Harrison individually, and as one of the Democratic party,
opposed every measure which the people of this country succeeded in
triumphantly adopting. He was a member of that party, active, zealous ;
and himself believed, as the party declared in 1864, that the War was a
failure ; and had it been left to Carter Harrison he would have called our
armies home, with their banners trailing in defeat. Carter Harrison had
the right to all these opinions ; he had a perfect right to the expression of
those opinions ; but the stern logic of this world in political affairs, and the
necessities of .this world in political affairs, have made men responsible for
the correctness of the political opinions which they advocated and enter
tained ; and in all other times, and in all other countries, a steady persis-
CHICAGO CITY MISGOVEKNMENT.
tence in political heresis of so serious a character as finally to lead to civil
\\ar, has consigned those who believed in them to political exile and out
lawry. So universal has this rule been in its application, that until quite
recently even the parties subjected to this rigorous measure of punishment
have made no complaint.
"His course since the war has been just as steadily and persistently
wrong. During all that time he has been an active and zealous member
of that party which in 1868 declared the reconstruction measures revolu
tionary, unconstitutional, and void ; and I am entirely justified in saying
that in the opinion of Carter Harrison these measures included all the con
stitutional amendments, — that which gave freedom to the votes, — that which
made him a citizen and secured him in the privileges of citizenship, — and
that which gave him the right to vote, were revolutionary, unconstitutional,
and void ; and I have yet to learn that he has recanted those opinions.
"That is not all. In 1868 he and the party to which he belonged
favored the practical repudiation of the National debt ; and as they had
previously sought the destruction of the National life, they then sought
the destruction of the National honor and integrity. He and the
party to which he belonged advocated the payment of the debt in
greenbacks. His whole course has been one of reaction, and politically of
obstinate and persistent opposition to every great measure of public policy
which has made us a nation, — which has elevated us from a mere jangling
combination of jarring States into one and indivisible Union. Carter Harri
son, as a Democrat, has opposed every great measure in Congress which
looked to putting into practical operation the constitutional amendments to
which I have referred.
"We are, however, constantly reminded that the pending election is a
merely local one. In one sense this is true; but in its larger and broader
sense it is not true. What answer does the heart of this great city make
to that suggestion? With how much patience would you listen to-night to
an orator, however eloquent he might be, who would declaim to you exclu
sively upon the questions of finance and mere local legislation? Your hearts
tell you that the issue is a vastly broader one than that ; and that the result
of the contest now so close upon us must be mightily significant to the
position which we are to hold in the great national issues which we will
meet in 1880. There are, my fellow-citizens, questions that arise away
above taxes. The considerations to which I have referred, which involve
the national honor and the keeping and execution of the plighted faith of
the nation, swallow up entirely all these merely financial considerations. It
is, indeed, important as to how much your property shall be assessed, and
how frequently it shall be assessed ; but vastly more important is it that the
property itself should be secure, and that you should be protected in your
enjoyment. More important is it that wherever the flag floats you should
think as you pleased, speak what you thought, and vote with no one to
molest or make you afraid. I am so much a believer in the existence of
this country as a nation that I believe that all its parts are indissolubly
welded together. Chicago cannot be separated from the United States of
62O LIFE OF EMERY A. STORRS.
America. It is a great, thriving, active portion of this great Union; the
pulse that beats here beats to the remotest confines of the whole country.
Chicago is affected by every measure of policy which has national concern.
Its commercial interests run to the extremest boundaries of the Continent.
It is the child of good Government. It thrives with peace and order. It
will have peace and order if it fights for it. We must realize the situation.
We meet to-day a united and solid South ; we are bound to take the situation
as we find it ; we may extricate ourselves from the difficulties of the situation in
one way, and in but one way. A divided North will not suffice to confront a
solid South ; a divided North means a universal South ; a solid North means
salvation ; without a solid North we have a divided Union. Moreover,
when I am assured that this contest is local, I am constrained to ask whether
the gentlemen ever considered how important is the locality. This city is
the heart of the Northwest. Again, and again, and again has the voice
that it has uttered given courage and character to the whole Northwest. I
would have this great metropolitan city lose nothing of this proud position.
The man who dies of a disease of the heart dies of a local disease, but
it is the poorest and most unsatisfactory consolation to his friends to be
assured that the disease of which he perished was a local one. For some
sins or other that we have committed, the Almighty may in His wrath visit
upon us a Democratic party in this city; it is a local triumph, but it is a
blow at the heart of an Empire.
"This Democratic party that we meet to-day is the same that we met
and defeated in the field. Its methods are devious : its successes are
achieved not like ours. This great loyal party of the nation flies to its vic
tories like an eagle ; the Democracy crawls to its victories like the worm.
Just as sure as God reigns, the time for sentiment, the time for comprom
ise, the time for conciliation, is past. [Applause.] We have gone even to
the very verge of the last dishonor ; we can degrade ourselves no more.
There are better things than peace : I want to see this great party once
more awake, as in the olden time, taking on its form of glory, with its
sword and with its shield and spear, taking the poorest of its citizens by
the hand, leading him through the serried ranks of the enemy, and saying,
'By the living God, you shall cast an unrestrained ballot!' [Loud
applause.] I have no more occasion for political courtesies, nor have you.
Let there go out from this great city such a word as our President shall
hear and shall heed. Let it roll like thunder over these prairies, and tell
him that he must not falter now. The spirit of the people is awake, and
the old feeling is in the air. One by one the stalwarts go to the Senate
and the House, — Chandler, Logan, Carpenter, Conkling, — all the old braves,
with masculine virtues; loyal to the heart's core. Let us encourage them.
"And now, in conclusion, gentlemen, I desire to offer to this meeting a
resolution :
"The citizens of Chicago, in mass-meeting assembled, appreciating the
dangers that threaten the public peace and order,
" Resolved, That it is the will of the loyal people of the West that all
revolutionary attempts of whatever character that may assume to interfere
CHICAGO CITY MISGOVERNMENT. 621
with the purity of the ballot-box on a free vote by the overthrow of legis
lation calculated to secure that end must be met and must be defeated at
any hazard and at all cost. [Applause.]
"Resolved, That the time for further parley or compromise has passed,
and that we confidently trust and earnestly hope that wherever the occa
sion presents itself and the necessity arises, all revolutionary efforts of this
character shall encounter- the Presidential veto. [Great applause.]
"Resolved, That a copy of these resolutions be at once forwarded by the
President of this meeting to the President of the United States.
"And I move the adoption of these resolutions."
They were adopted amidst the loudest applause.
CHAPTER XXXIII.
NATIONAL POLITICS IN 1879.
A POLITICAL TOUR IN NEW YORK STATE — AT SYRACUSE — CONSERVATIVE
AND RADICAL REPUBLICANISM — DEMOCRATIC HYPOCRISY — ATTEMPT TO
REPEAL THE ELECTION LAWS — THE MURDER OF CHISHOLM AND DIXON —
SOUTHERN IDEA OF "CONCILIATION" — HONEST GOVERNMENT, NATIONAL
PROSPERITY, AND NO SECTIONALISM — SUDDEN DEATH OF HON- ZACHARIAH
CHANDLER.
IN October 1879, Mr. Storrs was called upon to make another
political pilgrimage through New York state, and was absent
two weeks, during which time he made six speeches at impor
tant points on behalf of the Republican party. The canvass
was conducted with great warmth on both sides, in view of
the Presidential election to take place the following year. Mr.
Storrs spoke at Elmira, Cortland, Ithaca, Auburn, Syracuse, and
Norwich. He was also advertised to speak at other towns,
but business engagements rendered it impossible to fill these
appointments. The largest demonstration was at Syracuse,
where a mass-meeting of the Republicans of Onondaga county
was held. Mr. Storrs discussed three leading topics, — conserva
tive and radical Republicanism, the Democratic platform, and
the doctrine of State rights. The impression produced is graphi
cally described by the Syracuse Daily Journal:*
"Looking over the great audience that filled the hall, it was noticeable
that all the elements of the Republican party, and all shades of opinion
were represented. It was a sore disappointment that illness detained Hon.
Eugene Hale, of Maine, but the disappointment was dispelled as soon as
the speaker of the evening, Hon. Emery A. Storrs, of Illinois, took the
platform. His easy bearing, polished utterance, and fluent speech soon
captivated his audience, and prepared them for one of the most convincing
political addresses ever delivered in Syracuse. His comparison of the
records of the Republican and Democratic parties, elicited repeated applause
'622
NATIONAL POLITICS IN 1 8/9. 623
and made every Republican feel that he had nothing to be ashamed of,
but everything to be proud of, in that he belonged to the party that had
saved the Union, which was the only custodian of free government.
"Mr. Storrs' address abounded in telling illustrations, in the pointed applica
tion of parables, in keen satire, and unsparing exhibition of Democratic faith
lessness all of which were quickly appreciated and heartily applauded."
Mr. Storrs spoke as follows:
" I prefer to speak, not as a Conservative Republican, nor as a Radical
Republican. I confess an inability to understand precisely what those
distinctions mean. I am simply a Republican, and in the present situation
of our affairs, cannot comprehend, how my Republicanism can be classified
or qualified.
"Republicanism means among other things, and principally to-day, the
equal and impartial execution of the laws throughout the whole country, and
the full and complete performance by the nation of all its guarantees. If
Conservative Republicanism means that national obligations shall be moder
ately performed, and national engagements shall only be partially
kept, then I am not a Conservative Republican, and have no hesi
tancy in repudiating any such attempted distinctions as utterly unsound
and fallacious. Republicanism means, that the nation shall enforce all its
laws, and shall faithfully keep all its engagements with all its citizens.
" It means this, because the nation has solemnly agreed that every citi
zen shall have a free ballot, and you might as well justify exceptions to
that agreement, by giving only a portion of the citizens such a ballot, as to
justify yourselves in paying a part of your national debt when you had
agreed to pay it all.
"The failure to pay a portion of the debt at the time and in the manner
stipulated because it should prove to be troublesome and inconvenient
would be repudiation. And so the failure to secure to a portion of our citi
zens the full measure of a free ballot, because it would be troublesome or
inconvenient would also be repudiation. The talk of keeping an agreement
moderately, or of being conservative in the performance of solemn duties
and obligations is, it seems to me, absurd. No man can be too radical in
the performance of his duties, nor can he be too conservative in evading
or shirking them. If an engagement is to be broken at all, it should cer
tainly be done very conservatively.
" If the Republican party was ever a unit, it is one to-day. This is so
mainly because the great issues now before the people admit of no com
promise. Under the delusive and pestilential heresy of State Rights, the
power and authority of the General Government to prevent frauds and to
keep the peace at the polls at elections of Congressional Representatives, is
denied by the Democratic party. The existence of this power and author
ity in the nation is as emphatically asserted by the Republican party.
"On such a question no middle ground is possible. It is yea, or nay,
without compromise, concession, limitation or qualification. Upon this ques
tion it is idle to assail the administration, for the President and his Cab-
624 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
inet affirm the right, duty and power of the Government to prevent frauds
and suppress violence at the polls.
"It is enough for us to-day to know that the Republican party, from
the administration down to the most obscure private in the ranks, regard
all further efforts at conciliation as unavailing, and demand with one voice,
absolute justice to all citizens, the faithful performance of every national
duty and obligation, an honest ballot, a free vote for every citizen at any
cost and at all hazards, and the utter extirpation, root and branch, of the
doctrine of State sovereignty as now taught by the Democratic party.
"Are the issues of the times of Washington and Jefferson any more fresh
and living than those of the times of Buchanan, Lincoln — the rebellion —
Grant, Tweed, and the last Confederate Congress?
"Will not the Democratic Orators be good enough in lucidating their
platform to explain to an anxious public what principles of Washington and
Jefferson they re-assert. Do they re-assert Washington's principle of the
right of the Government to put down by force of arms forcible resistance to
the execution of the national statutes; as was the case in the suppression of
the Whisky rebellion, in which Washington invoked the military power of
the nation to enforce the collection of a whisky tax ? If so, why complain
if, acting on precisely the same principle, the Government to-day calls upon
the military power to enforce a statute enacted for the prevention of frauds
and violence at the polls? Or do they re-assert the supposed principles of
Jefferson, as announced in the Kentucky resolutions, practically asserting the
right of secession?' These were never Washington's principles — it has been
claimed that they were Jefferson's.
"Coming down to times within the memory of men still living, the plat
form, speaking for the party, says: 'We hold to the Constitution with all
its amendments, sacredly maintained and enforced, and to the rights of
States under the Constitution.' It is comforting to be now assured that the
Democratic party of the State of New York finally holds to the Constitution
with all its amendments. They have certainly taken a great step in advance.
In 1868 the Democratic party of the nation denounced the constitutional
amendments as revolutionary, unconstitutional and void. It is within the
memory of living men, when a Democratic Legislature of the State of New
York sought to repudiate and set aside the ratification by a previous Legis
lature of the I4th constitutional amendment.
"The I4th amendment provides that all persons born or naturalized in
the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the
United States. Does the Democratic party hold to and maintain this? Will
that party favor such congressional legislation as will protect all the rights
of all the citizens? Has the Democratic party heard that the privileges and
immunities of thousands of citizens of the South have been abridged? Is it
in favor of legislation by Congress to prevent such abridgment?
"If so, why not say so? It is of but little satisfaction to 'hold to and
maintain the Constitution,' without also holding to and maintaining the rights
which the Constitution guarantees.
"The Constitution does not enforce itself. Is not the Democratic party in
NATIONAL POLITICS IN 1879. 625
the somewhat absurd condition of being enthusiastically in favor of the
Constitution, and also enthusiastically opposed to all measures to put it into
operation ? No portion of the Constitution is efficacious without the aid of
legislation. The Democratic party is in favor of the Constitution, but opposes
the legislation necessary to enforce it. It holds to and maintains the guar
anty of equal privileges to all citizens, but it opposes all legislation by
which the guaranty can be carried out. We are a practical people, and
are not accustomed to confound the shadow with the substance. We desire
a Constitution which guarantees equal rights and privileges to all citizens.
But we must insist that the guaranty be kept. What we finally demand is
not the promise of freedom, but freedom itself; not merely a solemn assur
ance of equality of political privileges, but actual equality ; not the promise,
merely, but the thing promised. We insist that the promise shall ripen into
performance.
" During the war the Democratic party opposed secession, but opposed
the coercion of a State which seceded. It opposed rebellion, but opposed
the employment of force to suppress it. It favored the vigorous prosecution
of the war,* but denied the right of the Government to raise armies. The
Democratic party of the State of New York evidently believes that diseases
are cured by the physician's prescription and that it is quite unnecessary
for the patient to take the remedies prescribed.
"The Democratic party of the State of New York, in common with its
brethren in Yazoo county, is exceedingly nervous concerning centralization.
This is the language of the platform : ' The tendencies of the Republican
party to centralization and consolidation are contrary to the principles of
our institutions.' The charge lacks defmiteness and we call for a bill of
particulars.
"What are the evidences of these tendencies?
"First, The nation crushed a rebellion of Democratic States. Second,
The nation made freedom national and universal and consolidated a Gov
ernment strong enough to defend itself. Third, The nation incurred a
national debt and bound the nation to its payment. Fourth, The nation
provided a national currency — securing its holder against loss, making its
value uniform throughout the nation and redeeming it in coin. Fifth, The
nation made all persons born or naturalized within its limits citizens of the
United States. It guaranteed them against any abridgement of their privi
leges or immunities by any State. It deprives any State of the power to
deprive any person of life, liberty or property without due .process of law.
It prohibits any State from denying to any person within its jurisdiction the
equal protection of the laws. Sixth, The nation has declared that the
rights of its citizens to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United
States or by any State, on account of race, color, or previous condition
of servitude. It has conferred upon Congress the power to enforce
all these provisions by appropriate legislation. The nation has by appropri
ate legislation, sought the enforcement of these fundamental laws. This is
centralization, and this the Democratic party opposes and denounces it 'as
contrary to the principles of our institutions.'
40
626 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
"The noisy vigor with which the Democratic party demands unity is
something very beautiful to contemplate. 'Tis thus they make their plea
in their platform: 'We insist on unity, fraternity, concord, and that the
issues settled by the war shall not be revived. We deprecate the efforts
of the Republican managers to revive sectional feuds and to rekindle the
passions of the' past.' Did the Democratic party thus insist in perfectly
good faith, we might look for the speedy return of unity, fraternity and
concord. Did the Democratic party of the State of New York demand of %
the gentle brigadiers of the South that they must henceforth cease burning
school-houses, slaughtering negro voters because they were negroes and
because they voted the Republican ticket, that they should regard all citi
zens as possessing equal rights, they might possibly possess sufficient influ
ence to induce their Democratic brethren to cease for a while the vigorous
propagandism of pure Democratic doctrine, by the persuasive agents of the
torch and the shot-gun. It seems hard indeed that weak protests against
being murdered for opinion's sake, should be treated as a disturbance of
that unity, fraternity and concord which the armed and masked ruffians of
the South so persistently and so prayerfully seek.
"Pray what were the issues settled by the war? First and foremost was
the issue of State sovereignty. The war settled our right to be as a nation.
It settled the right of the nation to protect all its citizens. It settled the
right of the Government to execute its own laws by the employment of
force, whenever its officers were opposed by force. It settled the right of
the nation to utterly demolish any State or aggregation of States which set
the national will at defiance. It settled the power of the nation to conquer
and beat down any organization of individuals or States arrayed against it.
The Democratic party now disputes all these well settled propositions, and
it will be well for the Democratic party if it does not tempt the nation to
settle these questions again, for they will be assuredly settled in the same
way, but with added emphasis."
Mr. Storrs then reviewed the record of the Republican" party
since its organization, and rejoiced that \ve were members of
that party, which has done more to advance the interests of
the human race than all the parties that ever existed on the
face of the earth. He also reviewed the history of the Demo
cratic party and its achievements, and brought down the house
by the remark* that Tammany was powerful while Tilden, the
greatest scoundrel of the age was at its head, but according to
the Democratic papers, Tammany had lost its influence since
a man of spotless life and character like Kelly had taken the
leadership.
"Under the circumstances that exist at the South the question may well
be asked what was surrendered? \Vas it the guns only, or the principles
of disunion and State Rights and other dangerous heresies that came near
destroying the Union? The Democratic party in their platform say they
NATIONAL POLITICS IN 18/9. 627
want peace, fraternity and concord. If the Democratic party should say to
the gentle brigadiers you must cease your murderous acts and allow the
Union people of the South to vote and think and speak as they wish ; peace,
fraternity and concord will soon follow. But the peace they desire is the
peace of the graveyard. That is that peace that exists between the Demo
crats of the South and the murdered Chisholm and Dixon.
"But the most surprising feature of this extraordinary document is the
demand for honest elections, which is couched in this language : ' We
demand honest elections and an honest count of votes. Never again by
fraud or force, shall the popular will be set aside to gratify unscrupulous
partisans.' Proceeding from such a quarter this demand dizzies one. It is
as if Lucifer elevated on his brimstone throne should shout for a rigid
adherence to the ten commandments.
"The first answer to be made to this demand is, that if it is granted
just once more, the Democratic party will not have vitality enough left to
demand even a burial. By the act of Congress of 1870, an honest election
is precisely what we intended to secure, and this law the Democratic party
seeks to repeal by a resort to revolutionary measures. The Democratic
party never favored the passage of a law, national or State for the preven
tion of frauds at elections. No law of that character has ever been enacted,
of which it has not sought the repeal.
"This series of 'elegant extracts' must close with one of the most touch
ing passages in all literature, and stony indeed must be that heart which
can listen to the passage which I am about to read, without being moved
to its deepest recesses. David mourning for his Absalom, and Rachel
mourning for her children refusing to be comforted, present no picture of
grief and sorrow more bitter than this. ' We look with shame and sorrow
on the disgraceful repudiation of all their professions of civil service reform
by the executive and his supporters. Federal offices have been freely given
for despicable partisan services. The leading officers of the government
are making partisan speeches, managing political campaigns and requiring
their subordinates to contribute to the campaign funds in derogation of
every principle and promise of honest civil service.' This sounds like the
wail of a lost spirit.
"In the midst of our sobs and our tears may we be permitted to inquire
who 'we' are, that 'look with shame and sorrow,' etc. No Democratic
office-holder takes his weary pilgrimage up and down the State in behalf
of his candidate. No Democratic office-holder is asked to contribute a
dollar of money for political purposes. The Sage of Gramercy Park him
self scorns lucre, and refuses to employ it.
"But I will not lacerate your feelings by pursuing this distressing topic
further. Let us drop the curtain upon the tearful scene.
He then proceeded to discuss the question of State Rights and
other heresies at length.
"At the foundation of our present political differences is the old, old con
troversy of State Rights. The doctrine asserted to-day by the Democratic
party is precisely that which led them into rebellion in 1861. There is no
628 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORRS.
change whatever in the political principles which they maintain between
the Democratic party of 1879 an<3 1861; the only change is in the circum
stances and conditions to which their old heresy is applied.
"In 1 86 1 the Democratic party south asserted the right of the state
to secede from the Union, and the Democratic party north denied the
power of the general government to execute and enforce the laws,
denied the right of the government to coerce what they called a • sovereign
state.' Their doctrine of the sovereignty of the state is now precisely the
same, applied only to different conditions. To-day the questions are, first,
Has the general government power by law to regulate the elections
of its representatives and to enforce such regulations? Second, Has the
general government power by law to enforce the constitutional amend
ments, and in case laws made for that purpose shall be practically
nullified by force, shall the government put down by force resistance to
such legislation? . . .
"Our first inquiry then is 'Has the general government the right to
enact such laws?' Congress has, from the express language of the Con
stitution power by law to enact and alter regulations as to the time,
manner and place of holding elections for representatives. This language
is so specific, that it is impossible to gainsay, or deny it; yet leading
Democratic orators in the House and in the Senate, proceeded upon the
idea, that, notwithstanding this plain provision of the Constitution, the
general government has no right to keep the peace at the polls. It of
course occurs to us that it is very extraordinary that the Government of
the United States, is competent to enact a law, but is helpless and
incompetent to carry it into execution, providing the enforcement of that
law is resisted by force? In other words, if an attempt at the violation
of a national statute, takes form so serious as to result in the breach
of the peace, then the government is helpless, and the peace must be
maintained, not by the government whose express laws have been violated,
but by the state wherein the violations have occurred.
"How utterly absurd, indeed how criminally absurd such a proposition
is, as a matter of statesmanship and law, would be obvious from a mom
ent's consideration. The general government has provided for the transpor
tation of mails, carrying them into the remotest quarters of every state in
the Union. Yet while the Democracy will not question the right of the
government to enact such laws, and while they will avail themselves of all
the privileges which result from the transportation of the mails, they insist,
if the transportation of mails be resisted by force, the army cannot interfere
and secure the transportation of the mails. If a breach of the peace
results from such armed interference with the government, then peace must
be restored, the Democracy claim, not by the nation whose laws have been
insulted, but by the state wherein the insult was committed. So too, it is
unquestionable that the government may levy tax, for revenue purposes, on
whisky and tobacco : but the doctrine of the modern Democracy is if
the collection of those taxes be resisted by force and the peace be
broken, that peace must be restored by the state and the government
NATIONAL POLITICS IN 18/9. 629
must stand idle, until it sees its own laws enforced by an authority
which had no hand in their creation, which has no power to suspend
them, and no right to interpose an obstacle to their execution.
" But this question assumes a much broader significance in view of the
clear duties and privileges of the government under the constitutional
amendment. The real solid question of the hour, after all, is, 'Shall the
constitutional amendments be practically abolished?' An unexecuted law
is much worse than no law and the extremity to which we are now driven
is, that having placed in our fundamental law certain guarantees, the gov
ernment which has placed them there has no power to perform its engage
ments or to enforce obedience to the fundamental la\vs which it has enacted.
"When we consider the dangers that now threaten us, it would be diffi
cult to imagine a state of facts more alarming in their character. Stated
in a single sentence the condition of affairs is this : The majorities in at
least four great states are disfranchised by force, fraud and murder. Take
it upon an honest vote and Louisiana and South Carolina are as clearly
and unmistakably Republican as are the states of Vermont and Iowa.
Louisiana and Mississippi, South Carolina and Florida are Republican
states ; but the Republican voter is not permitted to cast a ballot.
"In certain parishes in the South which in one year showed by the
registration three thousand Republican votes, a few months thereafter when
the election occurred, showed no Republican votes whatever. Such a state
of things can not be explained upon any ordinary hypothesis consistent with
innocence. The facts sufficiently explain it. The Ku-Klux, the White Liner,
the Rifle Clubs, the raids by night, the burning homes — all these are the
efficient causes for the defranchisement of the majorities in these states.
"Pressed for an explanation for this condition of affairs, the Democracy
who, but a few years ago, unanimously and noisily asserted that it was
impossible to teach the negro anything, now claim that this tremendous and
sudden falling off in the negro vote is the result of the conversion to
Democracy, which has been in the main, effected through the miraculous
agency of Tilden's Literary Bureau.
"I must decline to believe that within a period of about ninety days,
this great literary bureau has been so efficacious a worker as to con
vert tens of thousands of white and black Republicans of the South from
the Republican doctrines, into the subtle and mysterious complications of
the Democratic creed. The fact is the pretence is absurd. Stated very
briefly, therefore, the condition of affairs is a steady, persistent and forcible
violation of the laws of the land. The inquiry is, what is the remedy?
"I shall now spend but little time in discussing the powers of the
government and its duty in the enforcement of the amendments. I think
I should not be justified in pursuing the inquiry as to whether the Con
stitution of the United States is constitutional. In reference to the ques
tion of the power of the government, I would say nothing were it not
for the fact that in most unexpected quarters that power seems to have
been overlooked. You will readily understand that I can have no knowledge
sufficiently definite or accurate to justify me in forming or expressing an
630 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORRS.
opinion as to the merits of individual controversies in this state. I can
have no knowledge which will justify me in expressing an opinion as
to the motives which seem to have constrained so distinguished a man as
Mr. George W. Curtis to advocate the scratching of the Republican ticket at
this campaign. I only know of Mr. Curtis that he is a man of wide
celebrity, of splendid culture, of the highest order of literary attainments,
and I suppose of the most blameless life and private spotless character.
"On this great question the power of the government to enforce its own
laws — the views of Mr. Curtis are not those of any other known Republican
in the United States. In a leading article of Harper s Weekly, published
September I4th, 1878, Mr. Curtis, in discussing these questions generally >
employs this very extraordinary language : ' Even if abuses of the colored
citizens were much more universal and flagrant than they are, they are of a kind
which can not be brought into national politics. Personal protection is under
local laws.' And again in the same article he says: 'A national party can
be maintained only upon national issues and the personal protection of a
citizen in his state is not such an issue.' May I be permitted to inquire,
in view of the constitutional amendments which I have just read to you,
why it is that abuses of colored citizens can not be brought into
national politics? The abuses which they suffer are in direct violation of
the guarantees or protection which the nation has made with them. Is
it possible that the enforcement of a national guaranty is not a national
question? And is it possible that when the steady and persistent viola
tions of national guaranties cover so broad an extent of territory that
four to five states are disfranchised these violations can not be brought
into national politics?
"'Personal protection,' Mr. Curtis says, 'is under local laws.1 This
is true of some kinds of personal protection, but it is glaringly untrue
and unsound as to the personal protection which is claimed for the negro
of the South ; for the personal protection claimed for him is explicitly
that which the constitutional amendments guarantee and promise he shall
have. In other words, the breach of a national engagement presents a
national issue. The nation has agreed to pay the national debt. The
question as to whether we shall pay the debt or not as we have agreed, is,
I apprehend, clearly enough a national question. The nation has agreed
to protect all its citizens in the enjoyment of all their privileges and immu
nities. Whether it shall thus protect them as it has promised, is as much a
national question as is the question whether it shall pay its debts. The
doctrine thus declared by Mr. Curtis leaves us absolutely helpless, for as
to the amendments prohibiting the state from abridging the privilege of the
citizen, the doctrine of Mr. Curtis would turn over to the state the entire
question as to whether the privileges should be abridged or not. Holding
such doctrines he could hardly vote for Mr. Cornell, for he and the Repub
licans of the state of New York and in every state and hamlet in the nation,
hold directly the opposite doctrine.
"The next inquiry is 'Have we any remedy for the evils of which we
complain?' And I trust that I will be excused if the remedies which I
NATIONAL POLITICS IN 1 8/9. 63 1
propose are of an eminently practical character, for the danger is imminent
and the injury is practical. You have observed that at the end of each of
the amendments which I have read to you it is provided that Congress shall
have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation. The articles
provide for the protection of the privileges and immunities of the citvzen,
securing to them the equal protection of the laws and the right of suffrage.
What would you suppose that appropriate legislation would mean in cases
where those privileges and immunities were denied by force and arms, by
violence and by fraud. It is well also to remember here that the Constitu
tion of the United States is not self-operating. It does not put itself into
motion. The Constitution provides in a general way for the transportation
of the mail. The Democracy is in favor of the Constitution, but applying
to that portion the same line of reason that he applies to the I4th and I5th
amendments, he would be opposed to legislation by which the postal system
was created. Hence we would have the Constitution and no mails. The
Constitution also provides for the creation 'of federal courts. The Constitu
tion-loving Democrat is enthusiastically in favor of the Constitution. But to
pursue the same line of reason he employs to-day, he would be opposed to
any legislation by which courts were organized ; hence he would be in favor
of the Constitution, but we would have no courts. The Constitution-loving
Democrat declares that he is in favor of the amendments ; he is in favor of
extending to all citizens of the United States equal privileges and immunities,
and protecting them ; but he is utterly opposed to any legislation by which
those privileges and immunities shall be secured. We are a practical party,
and what we want is not so much a Constitution that promises freedom as
freedom.
"I repeat now the inquiry, What is appropriate legislation, and have we
a remedy ? If, as the case now is, these privileges and immunities and equal
protection of the law are denied the citizens by force, would you execute
the law by a song, or a sermon, or a platform? Would under such an
emergency, the legislation that provided school books and school teachers,
be regarded as an appropriate legislation? So unpoetic am I that I think
it would be grossly inappropriate legislation. I think that where a right is
denied by force, that kind of legislation which will protect a party in the
enjoyment of the rights, proper for the emergency, is that which provides for
more force. I think in other words, that if a right of a citizen to vote is
interfered with by guns, his right should be asserted by more guns. If
armies interfere with a citizen in the enjoyment of the immunities and priv
ileges guaranteed under the Constitution, I would carry out and execute the
promise in the Constitution by larger armies. I know of no other kind of
medicine adequate to that emergency. Again, what is the remedy ? First,
hat kind of legislation that will clothe the Executive with the power to meet
force with force ; with the power to put down all breaches of the peace ;
with the power to keep its engagements by force, if necessary. That kind
of legislation first, and next a President with such rigidity of back-bone and
rigor of Republicanism that he will have no hesitancy to enforce the law to
its uttermost letter in the interests of justice. I know no remedy for violated
632 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
laws which can be considered as entering into sound and wise statesmanship,
short of the enforcement of the laws. It would be well, if by kind treatment,
patient pleading, intellectual and moral training, all people should be brought
tto that high standard where none would violate and all would obey the
law. We have not reached that high condition, and while we are toiling
towards it, the enforcement of the laws and the punishment of those who
violate the laws, must go on, and can not in the meantime be suspended.
"I confess that standing in the presence of great national guarantees
disregarded, national promises unperformed, laws shamelessly violated ; of
speech throttled and thought suppressed, my sympathy is for the outraged
victim of these crimes, and for the criminals who perpetrate them, I can
wish only — justice. I am not ungenerous nor unkind to the murderer when
I stay his hand. I am not cruel to the house-burner when I extinguish his
torch before he has applied it. I ask, first of all, that the insulted majesty
of a great nation be vindicated, and its violated laws be lifted up and
enforced. Toward all our fellow citizens, South and North, I ask the equal
enforcement of all the laws. I ask that crime shall be punished first. After
which, patient pleading with the criminal may be in order."
The following despatch to Hon. Chester A. Arthur, written on
the 3 1st of October, 1879, explains itself:
"Senator Chandler addressed last evening one of the largest Republican
meetings ever held in Chicago, and made, without question, the greatest
effort of his life. In apparently perfect health when he retired, he was
found dead in his bed this morning, having evidently died without a struggle.
He died with his harness on, and his last utterances apply even more
thoroughly to the Republicans of New York than Chicago. He said, 'By
your verdict you are to send forth greeting to the people of the United
States, saying either that you are in favor of honest men, honest money,
patriotism, and a national government, or that you are in favor of soft
money, repudiation, and rebel rule. You cannot afford to turn this govern
ment over to the hands of the repudiating rebels. Shut up your stores.
Shut up your manufactories. Go to work for country.' Will not the Repub
licans of New York regard this appeal as almost sacred, addressed to them ?
EMERY A. STORKS."
"Hon. Chester A. Arthur, Fifth Avenue Hotel, New York."
CHAPTER XXXIV.
EMOTIONAL INSANITY IN MURDER CASES.
TRIAL OF PETER STEVENS AT CHICAGO FOR THE MURDER OF HIS WIFE — A
SAD STORY OF CONJUGAL MISERY — THE TEMPTATIONS OF A GREAT CITY —
THE PLEA OF EMOTIONAL INSANITY SET UP FOR THE DEFENCE — MR.
STORRS MAKES A POWERFUL ARGUMENT FOR THE DEFENDANT — THE VER
DICT.
In the fall of 1878, the community of Chicago were again
startled and shocked by what at first appeared to be a mur
der of an atrocious character. The victim was a young mar
ried woman not yet twenty years of age, and her slayer was
her own husband, from whom she had separated. The scene
of the homicide was close by one of the beautiful little parks
of the city, and the time was a quiet Sunday afternoon, when
the park and the adjacent streets were full of people. Popu
lar indignation was aroused against the slayer both on account
of the sex and the extreme youth ef the victim; and had it
not been for the prompt arrival of the police, the verdict of
the excited crowd might have anticipated that of a legally
organized jury. But when the facts came out in evidence on
the trial which followed, there was a considerable abatement
of the popular feeling, and it was found, as not infrequently
happens, that the provocation the injured husband had received
was great, and that had he directed his vengeance against the
betrayers of his wife instead of against herself, his act would
have been pronounced a justifiable homicide by the general
voice of the community, and by the law of the State of Illi
nois as well.
It was the old story of a wife's infidelity and a husband's
wrath. Peter Stevens, the husband, was a youth not much
633
634 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
older than his child wife, and was employed as a clerk in
one of the courts. He added to his income by working in
the evenings as a copyist for several short-hand reporters of
testimony in the law courts. His young wife, living in a
boarding house, was thus left far too much to her own devices,
with the dangerous independence of a married woman while
yet littki more than a child, in a city where temptations to
go astray are peculiarly abundant. She formed bad associa
tions. Her personal beauty exposed her to the attentions of
a set of disreputable men, known as "mashers," who treated
her to theatrical matinees, and entertained her at restaurants of
questionable reputation. Her intimacy with these men soon
became known to Stevens, and the quarrels between him and
his wife on this account rendered their married life unhappy.
Her own mother does not seem to have been qualified to
give her judicious counsel. She took part with the erring
wife against the angry husband, and finally Mrs. Stevens went
back to her mother's home. Stevens was forbidden by his
mother-in-law to come there to visit his wife, and under her
influence his wife refused to see him. On the Sunday morn
ing of the tragedy, Stevens was met by an acquaintance who
told him that he *had seen Mrs. Stevens the night before
entering a hotel with a real estate man named Boyd, well
known around town. Stevens had before forbidden his wife
to receive this man's attentions or continue his acquaintance,
and this information stung him to uncontrollable fury. He
sought out his wife, and in the afternoon met her near
Jefferson park, walking with another woman. He went to
her and asked her to speak with him aside. Her answer was
defiant and repelling. She told Stevens she wanted nothing
more to do with him; and he, finding remonstrance vain, and
driven out of himself with passion, drew a revolver and shot
her, killing her instantly.
The shot was heard by a policeman close by, who con
veyed Stevens to the police station. He was indicted for
murder, and tried in the' Criminal Court of Cook County in
April 1879, Mr. Storrs appearing for the defence.
The theory of the prosecution, which was very ably con
ducted by Hon. Luther Laflin Mills, the eloquent State's
EMOTIONAL INSANITY IN MURDER CASES. 635
Attorney of the county, was that Stevens was a jealous, ill-
tempered fellow, who treated his young wife cruelly, and got
into an unreasonable rage whenever he saw or heard of her
speaking to a male acquaintance, and that her mother had
been obliged to interfere and separate them, to save her
daughter from his brutality. Mrs. Young, the mother-in-law,
came upon the stand, and swore in positive and unmeasured
terms to this state of affairs; and Stevens' landlady and her
neighbors also testified to his ugly temper and rough behavior
to his Wife. They were obliged to admit, however, on cross-
examination, that Mrs. Stevens frequently went out at night to
dances with other men while her husband was at work in the
city, and that the scenes they described always happened
when Stevens came home and found her absent, and learned
that she was in company of which he disapproved.
The objective point of the defence was to show the pro
vocation which Stevens had received,, as illustrating his state
of mind at the time of the shooting, and supporting the plea
of emotional insanity. For this purpose it was shown that in
the first year of his married life, he had obtained a situation
in Cincinnati, and taken his bride with him to that city. He
had night work to do there also, and one night, on coming
home, found his wife absent, and learned from the people of
the house in which he boarded that she had gone to the
theatre with a man whose acquaintance he had desired her
to avoid. His jealousy and indignation so overcame him that
he had an epileptic fit. On another occasion, in her absence,
he looked into her trunk, and found there a package of
letters which she had been imprudent enough to preserve.
Reading these, he discovered that they contained proposals of
assignation from some of the fast youth of Chicago, — one
from a real estate man of the name of Sampson. In one of
these letters there was an invitation to Mrs. Stevens to take
a moonlight sail across Lake Michigan in an excursion
steamer, with a suggestion that the writer and herself should
occupy the same berth. The perusal of these letters threw
Stevens into another paroxysm, and a terrible scene occurred
berween him and his wife on her return. Stevens threw up
his employment in Cincinnati and returned to Chicago, taking
636 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORRS.
his wife with him. There she pursued the same line of con
duct, and the tragedy of that peaceful Sunday was the result.
Several of the poor girl's betrayers were put upon the witness
stand, and made to confess their own infamy. Mr. Boyd wrig
gled uneasily on the chair, and seemed to feel keenly the uncom-
fortableness of his position, while subjected to the scornful ques
tioning of Mr. Storrs. He denied that there had been any crim
inality in his intercourse with Mrs. Stevens, whose acquaintance
he said he had made through her coming to his office seeking
employment as an amanuensis. Sampson, on the other hand,
when confronted with his own letters, treated the matter with
the most unfeeling bravado, as an exploit of which he seemed
to be proud. He had evidently braced himself up for the exco
riation he received from Mr. Storrs. The climax of this branch
of the defence was reached when Mr. Storrs put in evidence sev
eral letters from Stevens' mother-in-law to him in Cincinnati,
showing that on making these discoveries of his wife's unfaith
fulness Stevens had written to her, and in her replies she con
demned her daughter's conduct, and praised Stevens for his for
bearance and kind treatment of the wayward girl. This com
pletely destroyed the effect of Mrs. Young's testimony and that
of the long array of female gossips whom the State's Attorney
had skillfully marshaled in the court-room, and, added to the
testimony which Mr. Storrs had forced out. of the mouths of the
poor girl's seducers, turned the scale in the prisoner's favor.
Several medical experts were called, to whom Mr. Storrs sub
mitted a hypothetical case embodying the facts as claimed for
the defence, and elicited from them an opinion that Stevens, at
the time of the shooting, was in a condition of mental irrespon
sibility. On the part of the State, some other experts who had
made insanity a study were called, and to them Mr. Mills pro
pounded an equally ingenious hypothetical question, setting forth
the facts as he claimed them to be; and as a matter of
course these gentlemen pronounced Stevens sane at the time
of the homicide. Mr. Storrs put the State's experts through
an exceedingly clever and adroit cross-examination, and suc
ceeded in confusing some of them, and leaving an impression
that they did not know quite so well what they were talking
about as did the experts called for the defence.
EMOTIONAL INSANITY IN MURDER CASES. 637
The defence of emotional insanity, relied on in the Stevens
case, was at this time altogether out of favor with juries in
our criminal courts. It had been successfully resorted to in
murder cases so many times that the newspapers denounced
it, and a public opinion had been created, rightly or wrongly,
that this plea in such cases was " too thin," and that its
successful advocacy was equivalent to a miscarriage of justice.
It was clear that the jury in this case were more impressed
by the facts brought out in the testimony for the defence
than by the technical plea. In an able argument, Mr. Storrs
reviewed these facts, and spoke pathetically of the blighted
married life of the defendant, the wreck of his domestic
peace, and the mental suffering he had endured. On this
point he appealed not only to the testimony of Stevens' Cin
cinnati landlady, but also to that of some of Stevens' Chicago
employers, who gave a striking account of his despondency
and distress of mind for weeks before the shooting, and also
spoke highly of his general character. He commented with
withering scorn upon the conduct of the scoundrels who had
seduced the poor, thoughtless young wife, and contrasted Mrs.
Young's letters to Stevens with her story upon the witness stand.
He read a large number of extracts from authorities on medical
jurisprudence, and from the works of distinguished English and
American doctors on the subject of legal responsibility in mental
disease, — such as Maudsley, Tuke, and Hammond, — and claimed
that when he fired the fatal shot, Stevens was the subject of what
these writers call an "irresistible impulse," and could not be held
responsible for the crime of murder as charged in the indictment.
The jury evidently made allowance for the provocation that
Stevens had received, and absolved him from the supreme
penalty; but they were not convinced of his legal irresponsibility,
for they sentenced him to fourteen years' imprisonment.
CHAPTER XXXV.
AN ADDRESS TO DOCTORS.
A SERIO-COMIC ADDRESS TO A GRADUATING CLASS— EARLY RECOLLECTIONS
OF HOME-MADE REMEDIES — WHAT HE KNEW ABOUT DOCTORS — CHICAGO
THE GREATEST MEDICAL CENTRE AND DISTRIBUTOR OF DOCTORS AND
DISEASES — THE FIELD OF MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE — MEDICAL EXPERTS AS
OTHERS SEE THEM — INSANITY AS A DEFENCE IN CRIMINAL CASES.
IN a lengthy description of the sixth annual commencement of
the Chicago Homeopathic Medical College, a journal spoke
of Mr. Storrs, who was the orator of the occasion as follows :
"Emery A. Storrs, one of Chicago's best known citizens, is a
study. His greatness — for he may be said to be great — does
not lie in any one exclusive direction. He possesses a combina
tion of qualities in more than an ordinary degree of excellence.
And there can be no doubt that* if he had chosen any one of
the three paths that are manifestly open to him as his exclusive
line of life, he would have reached a foremost place. If he had
chosen the profession of oratory, he would have left Beecher,
Gough, and Ingersoll, far behind. If he had confined himself
wholly to law, he might have stood to-day peerless among the
legal magnates of America. If he had made politics the passion
of his life, heaven only knows what he might not have been by
this time. He is a very remarkable man as a speaker. He has
the unusual faculty of knowing exactly what to say, and the still
more remarkable gift of knowing what not to say. . . . He has
the skill of leaving his audience' with the impression that there-
are about five hundred and eighty-four good things which hu
was going to say, but time is up and he will save them till
next time ; and so it comes to pass his audience never tires of
him. As a lawyer, he holds a place all his own in the legal
638
AN ADDRESS TO DOCTORS. 639
profession. ... As a politician, Emery A. Storrs is not regarded
as an aspirant for any office. . . . On Thursday, the 2nd of
March, the sixth annual commencement of the Chicago Homeo
pathic Medical College took place at Haverly's theatre, and
Emery A. Storrs was appointed orator for the occasion. The
arrangement was a great joke; but Mr. Storrs was equal to it,
and he made a speech writh a good deal more of genuine wit
than Mark Twain would have uttered under similar circumstances.
The oration, however, did not close without some very wise and
weighty words. There was a distinct moral adorning the tale so
pleasantly told. The affair was a grand success, and that owing
largely to the fact "Saul was among the prophets." Chicago
may well be proud of Emery A. Storrs, if he is the "mildest pill
in the box.'' The speech, in full, was as follows :
"MR. CHAIRMAN AND FELLOW-CITIZENS: During my absence from
home this whole business, so far as I am connected with it, was arranged.
I was appointed and advertised, as the orator on the occasion of a medi
cal college commencement, by my clerk. I was selected probably because
of my large, varied, and broadly comprehensive ignorance of all the topics
involved in the course of education and training. [Laughter.] I probably
know less about medical things than almost any man in this community.
I not only lack reading, but I lack practical and personal experience of the
medical science. And I was probably appointed to occupy this position for
the reason that I would be entirely unembarrassed by the facts, and unen
cumbered by any knowledge of the subject, so that in my speech I might
wander with 'maiden meditation' and 'fancy free.' [Laughter.] That is
what I propose to do. [Renewed laughter.] And I say now that I shall
probably deliver to you the most discursive address you ever heard on
this or any other topic.
"I have said I have no medical reading to qualify me to talk to medi
cal students or to doctors. I have but very little experience in medical
practice, because very little of it has ever been bestowed upon me. My
recollections date back many years ago, when, as a very young boy, I
first discovered that there was a bitter to every sweet and, for reasons
which my mother and you doubtless understand, I never could appreciate
the virtue of spirits of turpentine with all the sugar I ever had. [Laugh
ter.] My reminiscences of the measles I will not now undertake to recapit
ulate. I look back upon spirits of turpentine expressly — upon the years
when I took senna and catnip, and regret that I was not born in a later
generation, when the size of the pills had been largely reduced, and
the nauseousness of the doses had been very much alleviated. [Laughter]
I think 1 can appear here to-day as counsel for the great body of our
fellow-citizens, deeply interested in you and your science — the patients.
I propose to speak for them.
640 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
"They have my sympathy. [Laughter.] I very much doubt whether you
have. And when I have been hurriedly looking over the statistics and find
1,200 medical students in this town in one year, you must excuse me if
such a table of figures excites in my mind the most grave and serious, and
alarming apprehensions. [Laughter.] I am assured that Chicago is a great
medical centre. Whether that is something that the great body of its peo
ple who don't administer medicine are to rejoice over I don't know; I am
not so sure about it : but with you, gentlemen, as much as with us, time
makes all things even. The time finally comes when we have to go to you.
And then we beg of you, for our sakes and for your sakes, use your sci
ence, but go slow. [Laughter.] Chicago is a city of wonderful growth,
and for the last half hour I have been meditating upon the marvelous equi
librium of things which we find throughout all this world, and that, even
in the creations of doctors, that great economic law of supply and demand
is enforced. We have in this city, I am told, six medical colleges and one
school of nurses. Two of these colleges are allopathic, two of them homeo
pathic, one of them eclectic, and there is one woman's college, also allo
pathic. These buildings cost $250,000. The number of students — I wish
my patient sympathizers to understand — last year was 1,200, and the num
ber of graduates reached the astonishing number of 600. Think of that!
And these students and these graduates came from every State and from
pretty much every country of the habitable civilized globe. These young
medical students spent in this city, in one way or another, during the last
year, about $300,000. That is the present situation of this great science
in this city to-day, The future promises very largely, for when the
Cook County Hospital is completed it will be the largest in America, Next
year a new college, to be known as the Chicago College of Physicians and
Surgeons, will be completed. It is to be directly opposite this great hos
pital, and then there will be gathered around it four medical colleges.
This, I am assured, will make the City of Chicago the greatest medical
centre in the world. There is something eminently fitting, and proper, and
natural, that these colleges should gather around a 'nospital. It follows
other lines of development. The pork-packing establishments gather around
the Stock-Yards. [Laughter.] There is nothing funny about that. [Renewed
laughter.] The grain dealers gather about the Board of Trade, the lawyers
hover about the Court-House, and the medical colleges surround the hos
pital. The past of the history of medical education in this city will illus
trate how remarkable and how wonderful its growth has been. Fifteen
years ago there were thirty-five homeopathic students in this city. Ten
years ago there were eighty-four. Five years ago there were only eighty-
six. But two years later, after the establishment of the Chicago Homeo
pathic College, the number had increased to 150, and this year the
number doubled any previous year. Thus, as you see, Chicago in
another respect has become a great distributing centre. It distributes
doctors and disease probably in a larger measure and in a larger var
iety than any other city on the face of the habitable globe. We have
more kinds of doctors, and we have more kinds of disease, and we ere-
AX ADDRESS TO DOCTORS. 64!
ate doctors and diseases faster, and the calls for both are larger, and
the supply is more nearly regulated by the demand than any other known
commodity. For wherever, from our infamous system of drainage, from
the universal diffusion of sewer-gas, a new and complicated form of dis
ease springs up, Chicago furnishes a new kind of doctor, eminently fit
ted and adequate to treat that new sort of disease. [Laughter.] In this
respect, you see, I am speaking of it as an economic question, regula
ted by the great and inflexible law of supply and demand. There is one
favor I would like to ask of this graduating class, and that is that they
won't set up the old-fashioned job on us, whenever a new disease pre
sents itself with which they are not able to deal, and call it the mala
ria, as if that meant anything specific. That is what I know about doc
tors.
"There is something, however, which I desire, in a rather more serious
vein, to say to you, and that is that your profession holds very near and close
relations to my own, and that you will find, before you have finished it,
that the profession of medicine has very much to do with the administration
of justice, particularly with the administration of criminal justice. I wish to
impress upon you the importance, which every practicing lawyer has dis
covered from his actual observation, of the development, in a much larger
measure than we have heretofore seen, of the study and understanding of
that science, so to speak, which 1 may be excused for calling medical juris
prudence, and which, freely defined, means merely the application of your
medical science to the administration of justice. Physicians, from the very
nature of the case, are frequently called into courts as experts, their qualifi
cation as experts being based upon their supposed knowledge of the science
which they profess to and do practice. I may be excused for saying at the out
set that medical experts, as a rule, have within the last few years fallen into
very widely extended and very serious disrepute. Courts are inclined to disfa
vor and discredit them. That does not result from the fact that there is any
objection they have to calling to the administration of justice all the
aids which your science can furnish it, but rather from the fact that
there has grown up a class which, perhaps, may be called professional
experts, that has cast discredit not only upon the testimony of experts,
but upon that most worthy profession to which they profess to belong.
The distinguished and the able physician, I have discovered, as a wit
ness, is among the plainest and most undemonstrative, and simplest of
men. I find words of thundering length and sound, technical in char
acter, employed by the medical expert and witness, mostly by the medi
cal gentleman whose medical opinion is of but little value in court or
elsewhere. I remember a case which illustrates this, occurring almost in
an adjoining county, which shows how absurd this affectation of learning
may become, and how liable such affectation is to discredit even the
profession itself. A school-teacher was sued for whipping a boy in
school. A physician, bursting with his own importance, was placed on
the stand to describe the nature and extent of the injury, and he said
that he examined the boy's arm and found upon it 'a discoloration
41
642 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
caused by the extravasation of the sanguinous fluid beneath the cuticle.'
Called upon to bring himself down to the comprehension of the
average juror and the average natural man, he was fain to confess
that the condition in which he found the boy's arm was that it was
black and blue. [Laughter.] Now the first description, of course,
was rather appalling to the jury, and when it was thundered forth 1
looked for a very large verdict against my client ; but when it was
reduced to its ultimate, the verdict was reduced with it. [Laughter.] A
few years ago, in this city, we had a very famous case, which involved
a discussion, to the aid of which we were compelled to call physicians,
as to the effect of aconitene when externally applied. I remember [he
was not of your school] a large, bursting, bumptious, self-sufficient, all-
sufficient, insufficient man [Laughter], who came into court announcing
that the variety, and magnitude, and tremendous gravity of his engage
ments required that he should be immediately placed upon the stand
and released. Other distinguished doctors came there — quietly came and
went. This doctor gave us the views of Dioscorides on that plant, and,
being bothered about the origin and history of Dioscorides in his cross-
examination, I learned from that stiff and bumptious physician, that
Dioscorides was a contemporary of Peter the Hermit. And he staid all
through that blessed trial, which lasted ten days. [Laughter.] I think
he is attending some trial to-day.
"You are the most frequently called upon, perhaps, as I have said, in
criminal cases. See how wide your field is going to be in the future. The
validity of wills, the disposition of millions of money, vast estates, the inter
ests of families — all may hinge upon the intelligence of your judgment and
the intelligence and clearness with which you can express that judgment
with reference to the devising capacity of the testator. Questions arise as
to whether death was caused by accident or design. Don't let your science
run away with you, for the books are full of cases where medical witnesses,
some of the most conspicuous of whom were in that famous Baltimore
case, have been eager to find traces of poison, and the subsequent develop
ment of the utter uselessness of such investigations was all that prevented
the hanging of one who turned out to be an entirely innocent man.
"The larger class of cases involve what are called questions of insan
ity. And here I think you will excuse me if I give you a few words
of a lawyer's advice. I want to say to you that I doubt whether you
can, any of you, give what under all circumstances would be regarded
as a satisfactory definition of that word insanity ; and I have the author
ity of some very great medical men, and supplement their authority merely,
when I say to you that if you were put upon the stand and asked to give
a definition of insanity which is to be at all points correct, and which is to
cover every conceivable form of disease of the brain which might be
classified as insanity, I think you will find it safer to decline.
"Moreover, I want to suggest this: That insanity with the courts and
with lawyers may mean one thing, and insanity with you, as scientific
gentlemen, may mean another thing. The courts have to deal with the
AN ADDRESS TO DOCTORS. 643
interests of society, and they are bound to protect society, against the
maraudings of any man and every man capable of apprehending
the nature of his own conduct and capable of controlling it. Legal
insanity cannot exist, 1 think, wherever the party setting up insanity
as a defense has sufficient of mental capacity left to discriminate
between right and wrong — to know the difference between guilt and
innocence — to comprehend the consequences of the act with the com
mission of which he is charged, and able to control his own conduct.
Now, in my judgment — and I want to suggest that to you — I don't
care how crazy, how insane you may conceive a man to be, if he
comes within those limitations the law must treat him as responsi
ble. [Applause.] That is all there is about it. And I know that,
embarrassed with the solemnity of the position which you hold as medi
cal experts in cases of that character, you will move up to your opin
ions very cautiously — very patiently ; you will not be swift to tell them,
and when you are examining the symptoms which may indicate a dis
ease of the brain you will remember that it is not a mere disease of
the brain, without regard to its extent, which excuses from the commis
sion of crime, but that degree of disease which thus excuses must be
carried to that extent as to deprive the accused of legal and moral
responsibility by placing the act with which he is charged beyond the
power of his control for prevention or commission. You must understand
by this time that I have the Guiteau case in my mind. I commend
to you the charge to the jury by Judge Cox in that case as embody
ing what, it seems to me, is about as wise and satisfactory a solution
of this very difficult problem as can be found anywhere in the books.
On the other hand, so far as questions of insanity are concerned,
much is said nowadays about insanity of an emotional character. I don't
pretend to instruct you. It would be absurd for me to attempt to do so
on these questions. I invite your consideration to them. I ask you
whether there is such a thing as paroxysmal insanity, .and to think
about it before you answer. I ask you whether there is such a thing
as emotional insanity, and to think about that before you answer. I
ask you to consider whether illogical freaks, ill-reasoned enterprises, bad
temper, unfortunate speculations — anything a little out of the rut of the
natural — would lead your mind necessarily to a conclusion that the party
thus eccentric was insane. Take this test when these questions are put
to you ; Take any man's life — any man of strong vital, moral, and
intellectual forces — pick put in the strongest and best man's life all the
absurd things he has done, all the idle and ridiculous words he has
uttered, all the illogical enterprises — judged by hindsight — in which he
has been engaged, all the freaks and caprices which he has committed,
and pile them up on a table, dissociated from the general run of the
man's life, before any jury. I beg you to consider what havoc such a
display would make with the reputation for sanity of the strongest and
best men in our community? How would General Strong like to have that
test applied to him? I would not like k myselfr No man here could
644 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORRS.
stand it. I suggest that because these hypothetical questions will be put
to you, and the lawyer addressing the question to you will pick out
from the career of his client's life all the absurd and ridiculous things,
real and supposititious, and ask you what you think of such a man
that has done and said that sort of thing.
"You, perhaps, might say, if that indicated the general current of the
man's life, and spoke for it, and fairly illustrated it — if that was the
man, and not merely a part of the man — perhaps it would be sufficient
to reach the conclusion that he was legally and morally irresponsible
for anything he did ; but it seems to me that you would quite well be
justified in saying that you would hardly undertake to determine the
question of any man's sanity or insanity by supposed fragmentary and
isolated instances of his life, presented to you and laid before you for
your judgment. In other words, it reaches simply this result: You are
asked to give a judgment upon a most grave and a most serious ques
tion, whefe you are not placed in possession of all the facts necessary
to enable you to express a wise and intelligent opinion. You have not
been unmindful of the fact of the deep interest which the public have in
all these questions. And 1 look to this young class — this graduating
class of to-day from the Chicago Homeopathic Medical College — to
illustrate the truth of this proposition: that this year is wiser than last
year ; that you are not merely the creatures of precedent ; that to-day
you known, or ought to know, more about that curious piece of mechanism
known as the brain than you knew ten years ago ; that you are more
able to interpret it, to describe its, action; and that, if you have not
reached the point, you mean to reach the point where you will be able
to make the solution of the question of insanity of a legal character
one of degree — for you certainly will not agree with the experts of this
city that, in its legal sense, four-fifths of mankind are insane. It may
be — I don't know but that it is so — that of all the brains in Chicago,
four-fifths are more or less diseased. I presume that is so with the
livers. I have no doubt about that. I am told that four-fifths of the people
in this city have catarrh, more or less. Now, so long as catarrh and
the liver are not so expressly affected as to impair the general health
of the men we make no special count of it ; but so far as the human
brain, diseased though it may be, is not sufficiently diseased as to
deprive the afflicted patient of the capacity of determining between right
and wrong — knowing the nature of his action and controlling his conduct
— I think that he must be held responsible for it. This is a large sub
ject, and this is why I am talking about it so long.
CHAPTER XXXVI. 9
RECEPTION OF GENERAL GRANT IN CHICAGO.
GENERAL GRANT'S RETURN FROM HIS TOUR AROUND THE WORLD — RECEPTION
IN CHICAGO— THE UNION VETERAN CLUB— WELCOME BY MR. STORKS-
NATIONAL RIGHTS SUBSTITUTED FOR STATE RIGHTS — POLITICAL EQUALITY
OF ALL CITIZENS MUST BE SECURED, BY FORCE IF NECESSARY — JUSTICE
BETTER THAN PEACE— THE OBLIGATIONS OF THE GOVERNMENT MUST BE
FULFILLED — THE PRODIGAL SON IN A NEW DRESS — BANQUET OF THE
ARMY OF TENNESSEE — MR. STORRS SPEAKS FOR THE PATRIOTIC PEOPLE
WHO FED AND CLOTHED OUR ARMIES — CALUMET CLUB RECEPTION.
ON General Grant's return from his trip around the world,
in which the highest honors were paid him in every
country, he was received in America with a welcome such as
had never before been accorded to any citizen, and nowhere was
there a more cordial demonstration than in Chicago. For several
days the thoroughfares were decorated with flags, mottoes, and
emblems, and the General was the central figure at various
festivities. TJie whole city seemed during that week to be given
up to a general holiday.
A gathering of old soldiers, members of the Union Veteran
Club of Chicago, assembled at M'Vicker's theatre on the morning
of Thursday, the I3th of November, to give their old commander
a reception. General Grant was completely taken by surprise on
being brought face to face with a theatre full of veterans, and
called upon for a speech. "I thought," said he, "I was merely
coming here to see the place where you were to meet this even
ing, or some other time. I was not aware that I was going to
meet so many of my old comrades." The back of the stage was
occupied by a triple dais, in the centre of which, upon an elevated
throne, sat the goddess of Liberty, while at her feet were clustered
five little girls, who represented the Territories of the United
645
646 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
States. On either side of these stood two rows of young ladies,
representing the various States of the Union, the State represented
by each being designated by a handsome blue shield, with the
name of the State in gold letters diagonally across it. The god
dess of Liberty was draped in a regimental flag, and bore in her
right hand the staff to which clung the tattered remains of the
flag of the 2 1st Illinois infantry, and in her left a shield bearing
the inscription, "In the name of the United States, and the Union
you saved, I welcome you." On the left side were three muskets
stacked, and beside them a flag whose inscription showed that
it had been the standard of General Thomas' headquarters.
Speeches having been made by General John A. Logan and
General Grant, and "the drummer boy of the Rappahannock,"
the President of the club called upon Emery A. Storrs, to ^address
the meeting; which he did in the following words:
"If there are any ladies or gentlemen present in this vast audience who,
during the war, remained at home, I want their sympathy. I wish to
address them as my fellow-comrades. [Laughter.] It makes one feel
unanimously lonesome to sit up here among soldiers. I sympathize with
those who protected their families, as I did, at my fireside. And General
Grant and General Logan, having told you what they know about peace, I
would like to tell you what I know about war. [Laughter.] Being a law
yer, I naturally look at things in a lawyer-like way ; but it never for an
instant occurred to me that you could wage a campaign by Chitty's tactics.
I never wanted to see a court run either on Hardee's tactics. I supposed
that battles were to be fought in a military way, and not in a legal way.
I had no more idea that law-books could regulate the management of a
campaign than you could determine the question of a future state by science,
or the value of a fertilizer by theology. I always thought that war meant
something. I never believed in a conservative battle. I never sympathized
with that great constitutional General, who, when he fired his guns, fired
them with a bullet that went slow, so that there could be a chance for
capitulation before they reached their destination. [Laughter.] I never
believed in that kind of warfare. I thought, — and now I am addressing the
military branch of the audience, I thought that there was behind our
armies a great, splendid, magnificient, gloriously resplendent cause. I
thought you fought for it. I thought it was that cause which armed every
man, which took every soldier into the field. I thought you not only fought
for that cause, but against a cause; and I considered, that a surren
der of your adversary which involved merely the laying down of his arms
and an acceptance of the situation, without a surrender of the cause for
which he fought, was a gigantic and stupendous mockery. Was I not right
about it? [Applause.]
RECEPTION OF GENERAL GRANT IN CHICAGO. 647
"I say you fought for a cause. I am not very emotional, and while I
am not blood-thirsty on these great topics of Government, I am not senti
mental. I believe that the capitulation of the Rebel armies meant some
thing more than the capitulation of their armies. I believe that at Appo-
mattox Court-House they laid down the doctrine of State Rights and we took
it up ; that they laid down this infernal doctrine of secession, and we took
it up and pulverized it ; that they surrendered human slavery and we took
it, and I say that man is a flunkey who will give any of them back.
[Applause.]
" I am not blood-thirsty, but I mean business. I don't want to see
another war. And the exact way to see it is to conciliate an adversary
whom you have defeated, by giving back to him the fruits of the victories
you have achieved.
"I am talking to plain, rational people. I like some plain, sensible illus
trations. Suppose that a couple of men w^ere fighting about the possession
of a farm. Such things have occurred. Suppose that they fought with
guns, as you fought, and the man originally in possession was beaten.
When he was vanquished he said: 'I accept the situation. I lay down my
arms. Is there anything more you can ask. I desire to be conciliated.'
The other man says : ' That is all right, but how about the farm ; what I
want is the farm.' [Laughter.] Isn't that exactly our position? We want
what we established, — the doctrine of National instead of State sovereignty.
We extirpated human slavery from every foot of the soil of the Republic.
Didn't we do it? We declared that there was a centralized power which we
call a nation, and by the Fourteenth Constitutional amendment we made
everybody beneath the flag citizens of the United States. [Applause.] The
most splendid declaration that any Government ever made since the world
was made. We made some promises to our fellow-citizens in those amend
ments, and this is the serious question addressed to-day, and which will be
addressed for the years to come, to every citizen : Shall the Nation that
has power to make a promise have power to perform its engagement? I
say it shall. And the doctrine of conciliation — has it ever occurred to these
battle-scarred veterans that it would be an elegant thing if somebody sliould
come and conciliate them? Has anybody, in this gush of sentiment that
has pervaded and diluted our politics, ever proposed to conciliate you? We
went through the wrar to reconstruction, and gathered into our Constitution
the fruits of these great victories — solid, substantial ideas.
"We guaranteed to every citizen beneath the flag absolute political equality.
Have they got it? You know they have not. Why haven't they got it?
Because there is a large political organization in this country evoking the
old conquered doctrine of State Rights, which declares that, although this
Government has the power to make an engagement, it has not the power
to execute its agreement. This promise is interfered with how ? By force.
How will you put it down? I say by. force. These engagements are written
in the organic law. May I put just this suggestion to you ? Of what earthly
use is a constitutional provision without an act of Congress to enforce it ?
Not a particle. It don't execute itself any more than a physician's prescrip-
648 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
tion executes itself; not a bit. You might as well go to your doctor, and
get your prescription, and lay it on the table, and then consider that your
liver would be in proper condition thereafter without taking the medicine,
as to have no statute to put a constitutional provision in practice. Now,
this is practical talk. This is not eloquence. These constitutional provisions
contain a little clause at the end of every section: 'Congress,' it says,
'shall have power to enforce the provisions of this article by appropriate
legislation.' We are very sensible people. What is appropriate legislation?
That is the dividing line in our politics. Suppose the guarantee being that
the citizen shall vote, and the privilege is interfered with by force, what
kind of legislation would you have to execute a privilege where a privilege
is denied by force? I think you should have some legislation which would
call out force on the other side.
" How would you apply a remedy where a man came up and drove me
away from the polls? Would you have a hymn sung, or a platform read?
I would have legislation that would call for more armed men, wouldn't you?
I would have gatherings of this character for furnishing the Executive with
that rigidity, that everlasting stiffness of backbone, that he would stand up
and say, in the presence of the living God, 'This statute shall be executed,
or I will smash the whole concern.' [Laughter and applause.] We have
come right to that pass now. Suppose that armies are organized to interfere
with the enjoyment of these guaranteed privileges. I like to contemplate the
spectacle of a great Nation making a solemn promise, and then, with a
guzzling, drooling sort of helplessness, standing up before 48,000,000 of
people and saying that it would create a great disturbance if we carried out
our promise. I like peace. There are some things I like infinitely better. 1
like justice a great deal better than I like peace, and I would have ever
lasting and eternal uproar until I had justice. Now, wouldn't you ? [Cries
of "Yes."] The Almighty, my friends, don't do things always in a quiet
way. [Laughter.] When we have a pestilential and malarious atmosphere
that is charged all through with poison and disease, he don't send quiet,
still, and stealthy agencies, but the thunderstorm, the rain, the whirlwind,
and the earthquake come, and, in the conflict of the elements which follows,
the air is cleansed and purified, and we breath again with safety.
[Applause.] The kind of peace that this people desire is liberty, calmly
and safely enjoyed. No other kind of peace do we require. I have said
that this draws the dividing line. It does. There is no — I am going to
talk politics now. I can't help it. This great, broad, comprehensive,
National politics, — this politics that reaches from sea to sea, from one limit
and boundary of the continent to the other. It is the great politics, the
noblest of all human science, which asserts the equality of mankind and
swears by the living God it will enforce it. May be you never heard it
called so before. It ain't Democracy. It is politics. [Laughter.] Now,
then, we have made these engagements. Who made them ? Here is a
suggestion I want you to take with you when somebody talks State-Rights
to you. Take down the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Constitutional Amend
ments, and the more you read them the more absolutely lustrous and
RECEPTION OF GENERAI, GRANT IN CHICAGO. 649
splendid they become. There is no such literature on the face of the
earth. Concentrated in twenty lines are the splendid guarantees that make
all there is of human government, — the absolute equality of political privi
leges, liberties, and immunities. Not only that. This great cause of ours
embodied in the Union soldiery that is here to-day, — a cause as broad as
humanity itself, — declared in the organic law that no man should be inter
fered with in the enjoyment of his political privileges by reason of race,
color, or previous condition of servitude. These engagements have been
made by whom? By your State? No. By the State of Illinois, Indiana,
or Wisconsin? No State has made that contract with you. It is this
nation that has made it with you, and when the poorest and weakest of
our citizens, driven from the polls, takes the contract that his Nation has
made in his hands and goes up to this great, puissant body that I call the
United States of America and says: 'You promised that I should have
full and absolute privilege in casting an unconstrained ballot, and you
haven't kept your promise,' what is the Nation going to do about it? My
friends, you had better repudiate all engagements to pay money than
repudiate an engagement of that character. [Applause.] Rising right out
of the ground and the soil on which we stand is the splendid, puissant
spirit of our institutions, — that great, majestic form whose brow is clothed
with diamonds, shining with light, and armed with a sword and a shield,
taking the poor, trembling black man by the hand, with whom she has
made the contract, leading him through the files of his enemies, and, with
uplifted hands, saying: 'By the eternal God, in whose interest I speak,
you shall cast a ballot just exactly as I agreed.' [Applause.]
" I feel that it is exceedingly well for us to be here. The old spirit has
come over all the people. That great holy wrath that comes from trifling
with a splendid generosity is aroused throughout all the land. No more
can we be deceived by appeals to magnanimity until every man votes just
exactly as he wants to; and, until that time is reached, the solemn consid
eration as to what shall be the qualifications of a clerk in the Treasury
Department shall be indefinitely postponed. [Great applause and laughter.]
"I say all that this country has to give, all that grateful hearts have
to render up, all that prayers, all that high and elevated devotion have
to ask for, should be given to these splendid men before me to-day.
They saved this nation the priceless treasure of free government among
men." [Cheers.]
In closing Mr. Storrs used his favorite illustration of the Prodi
gal Son, applying to General Grant and his soldier comrades, the
father's words, "All that I have is thine," in his telling way.
General Grant spent the afternoon at the Palmer house receiving
visitors, many of whom had come from the country towns of
Illinois, Wisconsin and Minnesota, to see him and shake hands
with him. In the evening, he was entertained at a banquet in
the Palmer house by the society of the army of the Tennessee.
650 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
General Sherman presided, and speeches were made by General-
Grant, General Logan, Colonel William F. Vilas, General Pope,
Colonel Robert G. Ingersoll, Mark Twain, and others. Mr. Storrs
was called upon to respond to the following toast :
" The Patriotic People of the United States, who fed, clothed,
and encouraged our Armies, and who stood by us in defeat as
well as in victory." He said :
" iiR. PRESIDENT AND GENTLEMEN: Splendid encomiums have been
to-night pronounced upon the great commanders in a great war. Eloquent
and merited tributes have been paid to the loyal soldiers of that war.
Nothing has yet been said in behalf of that great body of the loyal people
of this country, who were neither generals nor soldiers, but whose steadfast
patriotism made the generals a possibility.
"These loyal and patriotic citizens never failed to remember, that your
victories included something more than the capture of armies ; that the
issues at stake were vastly greater than mere questions of physical prowess
or the heroism of contending armies. They never so far forgot themselves
as to concede for an instant, that the cause which the armies of the Con
federacy represented was, in merit, equal to the cause of the Union. The
people always knew that the final success of the Confederate armies
involved the dismemberment of a great Nation, the bondage of millions of
human beings, and infinite peril to the success of the experiment of self-
government inaugurated upon this continent. The Confederacy asserted the
right of secession — its armies were defeated, and secession was surrendered
with its armies. They fought for what they called the ' Sovereignty of the
States,' we, for the integrity and indivisibility of the Nation. They were
defeated, and they surrendered the doctrine for which they fought. They
took up arms that they might hold millions of human beings as chattels —
we for universal liberty and citizenship and these great results were
achieved, not solely by the soldier in the field, but the steadfast and loyal
citizen who remained at home shares the glory with him.
"These loyal and patriotic citizens have never yet been and are not now
willing to restore to their former adversaries any one of the political here
sies which they surrendered. Under no pretext of conciliation will they
ever consent to re-enslave the liberated black man, to deprive him of the
benefits which citizenship confers, or to re-open the questions of Secession
and State Sovereignty, as opposed to the idea of a Nation. We are a
Nation, and though as States we may be ' distinct like the billows,' yet, as
a Nation, we are 'one like the sea.' The loyal people are careful to
remember the sacred nature of the promises which, as a Nation, we have
made ; they know what the guaranty of an equality of political privileges
to all citizens means, and while boasting that the shackles have been
stricken from the wrists of four millions of slaves, they know full well that
nothing has been gained if padlocks have been placed upon the lips of
four millions of citizens.
RECEPTION OF GENERAL GRANT IN CHICAGO. 65 1
" May I not speak in behalf of that great army of loyal citizens who
volunteered to remain at home ; who guarded the ballot-box while you
carried the cartridge-box ; whose ballots were as effective as your bullets ?
There were generals at home, as there were generals at the front; and
he who encouraged the wavering, who cheered the despondent, who
convinced the doubting, and so inspired the citizen that he made his
convictions felt at the ballot-box; who rallied the voters when the skies
were dark, and inspired them with the hope of final success, even when
the tide of battle went against us, deserves to rank, and will in history
rank among the worthy leaders of a great cause. [Applause.]
"The theatre of the war was not confined to the localities where armies
were actually encamped, and battles fought. There was war, not merely
at Vicksburg and Gettysburg, at Richmond and at Appomattox Court-
House, but war also, differing in kind it is true, but war nevertheless, at
Chicago and Pittsburg, at Philadelphia and New York, in every city and
in every village where an arm was lifted or a voice was raised, to discour
age and dishearten the Union Soldiers in the field, or to encourage and
strengthen those who were in arms against them.
"Those public enemies who made war against the nation in the loyal
North, were a great army, none the less dangerous because they did
not carry muskets. An army of patriotic men was as essential to meet
them here as were the hosts of Union Soldiers to confront the armies
of the rebellion in the field. Attacks on the national honor must be
met by a steady vindication of the national honor. Appeals to base
motives of individual gain, must be met by stirring appeals to patriotism.
Doleful predictions of disaster and defeat, must be met by high-hearted
assurances of ultimate triumph. Hypocritical protestations of sympathy for
the slain, must be met by exhortations to remember the sacredness of the
cause in which they died. Prophecies of starvation, were belied by abun
dant harvests. The arts of the demagogue were overcome by the sturdy
phalanx of loyal men, who knew what freedom meant and how priceless it
was, and whose votes spoke for freedom. Wherever treason lurked, some
loyal eye must search it out. Speech must be met by speech; argument
by argument; disguised treason by outspoken and undisguised loyalty.
"Who, then, were the Soldiers in this great conflict? Not merely those
who went to the field of battle, but all those as well who tilled the fields,
that the soldier might not want, who comforted the mourning, who organ
ized vast charities, and followed every battle with their sacred ministrations —
who never lost faith in the future, who steadily relied and taught others to
rely more upon the power and goodness of God than upon the shrewdness
and dexterity of the devil, who searched out and defeated the schemes of
treason, hatched in our very midst. Cannons and muskets were not the
only effective weapons used. The plow and the hoe, the earnest appeal,
and the enlightened argument, were equally essential and effective. The
New England boy was fighting his country's battles when, with hoe in
hand, he struggled to extort an unwilling harvest from the reluctant soil, that
his brother at the front might be fed.
652 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
|
" Battles and elections acted and re-acted upon each other. The election
of a loyal Governor in a closely contested State, was the sure precursor of
a victory in the field, and a well-timed victory in the field carried many
an election at home. Not alone to the soldier does the glory of the great
triumph belong. Every single citizen who cast even the measure of his
influence on the right side, is entitled to share in this common glory.
" History will inscribe, in making up her final and impartial judgments,
on parallel lines, the solid heroism and sturdy sense of Grant, and the
patient, long-suffering loyalty of Lincoln, the grand strategy of Sherman,
and the wise counsels of Seward; the dashing and intrepid valor of Sheri
dan, and the devoted love of country of Richard Yates; the fiery energy
and splendid generalship of Logan, and the wise statesmanship of Morton ;
the dauntless courage of fighting Joe Hooker, and the resolute and uncom-
prising patriotism and sense of justice of Zachariah Chandler. Upon these
imperishable records there will be inscribed not only the names of the
great leaders in the great cause, but the humblest worker in its behalf will
find his name upon its pages. Bright and shining on those resplendent
annals shall appear the names of those thousands of noble, heroic and self-
sacrificing women, who organized and carried forward to triumphant success
a colossal sanitary aud charitable scheme, the like of which, in nobility of
conception and perfectness of execution, the world had never before wit
nessed, and wrhich carried all around the globe the fame and the name of
the women of America. From camp to camp, from battle-field to battle
field, through the long and toilsome march, by day and by night, these
sacred charities followed, and the prayers of the devoted and the true were
ceaselessly with you. Leagues and leagues separated you from home, but
the blessings there invoked upon you, hovered over and around you, and
sweetened your sleep like angel's visits.
"While the boy soldier slept by his camp fire at night and dreaming
of home, and what his valor would achieve for his country, uttered even
in his dreams prayers for the loved ones who had made that home so
dear to him, the mother dreaming of her son breathed at the same time
prayers for his safety and for the triumph of his cause. The prayers and
blessings of mother and son, borne heavenward, met in the bosom of their
common God and Father.
"Art unjust war is a crime, but peace purchased at the price of national
honor and integrity is a greater crime. The peace to which we aspire is
'liberty calmly enjoyed.' Injustice is not peace. A dismembered nation
is not peace. From such a contest as that through which we have passed
are developed the grandest and noblest of ^human characters. Great
thoughts are to be ranked with great deeds, and always precede them.
The smoke-grimed and battle-scarred banners of the Army of the Tennessee
are radiant with glory, and lustrous as shining planets, for the great cause
in which they were unfurled has made them so. Every battle which you
fought, and every victory which you achieved, was the expression of the
great thoughts of self-government, political equality, and national integrity.
Behind our armies were countless herds, and all the harvests of the North.
RECEPTION OF GENERAL GRANT IN CHICAGO. 653
Behind them, and moving as the armies moved, were its great sanitary
stores, its inexhaustible wealth, its dauntless spirit, its lofty love of country,
its millions of patriotic men and women ; floating over all, our country's
flag, which symbolized all that was sacred and lofty in human government,
and every breeze that unfurled its ample folds, carried the glorious message
that no foot of soil over which it waved, should be pressed by the foot
of a slave.
"The inevitable end came, the triumph of right over wrong, of justice
over injustice, and the rebellion fell in utter wreck, with a resounding crash
that was heard by all nations. The great cause of the Union, with
spotless robes with shining face and majestic form, came forth to meet and
receive the surrender of her adversary. From murky battle-cloud, from
stifling slave-pen, the dark spirit of secession and slavery emerged ; her
garments stained with the blood of the slave, her brow in gloom, the lust
of power and pride of empire in her eyes. Forth she came, and prostrat
ing herself before the majestic presence in which she stood, surrendered
herself, the guilty cause of a wicked rebellion." [Prolonged applause.]
The clubs of Chicago extended their hospitality to General
Grant, and the Calumet club, of which Mr. Storrs was a member,
gave him a brilliant reception. A prominent feature of the dec
orations of the reception hall was an address of welcome, beauti
fully painted on white satin in old English text. The idea of
presenting such a testimonial to General Grant was first suggested
by Mr. Storrs. By common consent, he was entrusted with the
duty of composing the address, and it was a model of its kind.
The Chicago Tribune very justly said of it, — " There was no flat
adulation, no fulsome, meaningless expression used; simply a
plain statement of patriotic facts, clothed in the utmost brevity
and simplicity imaginable. There was not a word too much, nor
a word too little."
CHAPTER XXXVII.
A TRIP TO DEADWOOD.
PROPOSITION TO NOMINATE MR. STORRS FOR CONGRESS — COMMENT OF THE
PRESS — LETTER TO HON. WILLIAM ALDRICH — A PROFESSIONAL TRIP TO
THE BLACK HILLS— DISCOMFORTS OF THE JOURNEY— HIS IMPRESSIONS OF
DEADWOOD— TRIAL OF COUNTY OFFICIALS FOR EMBEZZLEMENT— MINING
INTERESTS OF DAKOTA — INVITATIONS TO TAKE PART IN THE CAMPAIGN.
EARLY in the year 1880, and before the assembling of the
county conventions, there was talk of nominating Mr.
Storrs for Congress as representative of the First district, then
represented by Hon. William Aldrich. The Chicago Times, said:
"The popular, choice among Republicans for this important
office is Mr. Emery A. Storrs. His widespread reputation as an
orator, and the consciousness that, on the floor of the House, he
would reflect credit on his constituency, give him a strength
that no other candidate of Republican proclivities can hope to
equal. The gentleman himself is not desirous of running, but
such pressure may be brought to bear upon him that he will be
compelled to enter the list, especially since the Republicans feel that
they must place their strongest man in the field. Chicago has
not sent a brilliant speaker to Congress for many years. Carter
Harrison was the nearest approach to an orator that hailed from
here since the days of Douglas.
"It would be superfluous to give a sketch of Mr. Storrs. His
reputation is national as an orator and a lawyer ; and in the
walks of statesmanship, his admirers claim, he would shine with
unsurpassed lustre. He has been already sounded on the subject,
but declines to commit himself further than to declare he is at
the service of the Republican party."
Mr. Aldrich wrote to him offering to retire in his favor; and
Mr. Storrs replied as follows :
654
A TRIP TO DEADWOOD. 655
"April 1 2th, 1880.
" MY DEAR SIR:
. . "As to the congressional branch of your letter, I have this to say, that
under no conceivable circumstances can I be a candidate for nomination
for Congress. I have so stated repeatedly to every person making the
inquiry of me, and have seen no reason to change my first decision ; and
my resolution in that respect may be regarded as fixed and unalterable.
I go still further. I could not, and would not, accept the nomination if
tendered me by the convention. This I have also repeatedly stated.
"I am very much obliged for your kind suggestion, and am flattered by
the statement that you would support me. I am not unmindful of the com
pliment which would be conveyed. I know of no constituency anywhere in
this country which a man should be prouder to represent; but my profes
sional obligations are of such a character that I could not, without grossly
neglecting them, withdraw myself for the length of time which the discharge
of the duties of a Congressman would necessarily involve. In short, it is
absolutely out of the question. . . .
"I see no reason why William Aldrich should not be continued. I hear
no complaints, worthy of the name of complaints, made of him. He is a
good Republican, a man of excellent good sense, perfect integrity, and in
all things a gentleman. I am for him against the field; and when you see
him, say so to him."
Immediately after the close of the National Convention, he
had to go on a trip to the Black Hills. His visit was of a
purely professional character, the business which took him there
involving questions of title to certain mining property. As soon
as he returned he was interviewed by a reporter, and in his
accustomed genial way, responded. " When he left," says the
reporter, "he anticipated very little, if any, pleasure from the
trip, but a more enthusiastic Black Hiller probably never returned
from the four-year-old wonder of modern civilization."
"Every one, I suppose," said he, "is familiar with that great stretch of
country between St. Paul and Bismarck, the famous Red River country
with its vast wheat-fields. It seemed to me to be one limitless, boundless
plain of wheat as I looked upon it. Bismarck is a very active pioneer
place, the natural scenery around it is very beautiful, but in the trip to
Deadwood and the Black Hills the trouble begins at Bismarck. Those
coaches are built for use, and not for ornament; and, while no complaint
can be made of the management of the stage-line, and great attention is
paid to securing, not the comfort of the passenger, because that is impossi
ble, but to reduce the discomforts, yet it is a terribly tedious trip. The
distance between Bismarck and Deadwood is about 250 miles. This is
ordinarily made in about fifty hours, traveling day and night. Changes of
horses are made about every fifteen miles. After leaving Fort Lincoln all
that great stretch of country between that point and Fort Meade seemed
656 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORRS.
to me an utter desolation, although gentlemen who were with me said that
a large portion of it would be good wheat country. But the mosquitoes are
countless. There are simply millions of them. They are not in spots, but
all the way between those two points, say about 200 miles. It was impos
sible to travel without nets over the head and face. The Dakota mosquito is
about the same size as the New Jersey type, but more voracious, and,
vindictive. Aside from the stations, which are ordinarily sod huts, where
our horses were changed and we took our meals, there isn't a human habi
tation between Fort Lincoln and Belleforche, — not a cat, nor a dog, nor
sheep, nor any sign of any living thing with which civilization is acquainted,
— nothing but a dreary plain, with mosquitoes and prairie-dogs, and alkali
water, and antelope, with now and then the skeleton of some poor mule.
Common prudence requires you to carry water such as you will need for
drinking. Reaching Belleforche, however, matters began to change, and for
the better. Fort Meade, which is about thirty miles from Dead wood, is
situated in one of the loveliest valleys in the world. The scenery there
and all about it is surpassingly beautiful, and from there forward no com
plaint can be made. Fresher, greener, lovelier valleys were never seen.
There is a great abundance of pure, clear, cold water in the swift-running
streams. The Black Hills, most unfortunately named, because the name
conveys an erroneous impression of their character, heavily wooded as they
are, is as fine an agricultural country as can be found anywhere. In the
valleys enough wheat may be raised to supply the wants of the community.
That portion of the country, I think, would surprise every one with its
beauty and its fertility. It certainly did me. The hills are beautiful in
form and in grouping, the valleys fresh and green, and everything bears
the marks of prosperity.
"We reached Deadwood, by riding over what is there modestly called
a hill, but which we would call a mountain. The scenery is certainly
terrifying enough to satisfy any one. We found the village of Dead-
wood in a narrow gulch. Utterly destroyed last September by fire, we
found it entirely rebuilt, its streets thronged, substantial business blocks
on its main thoroughfare, and charming residences on its hillsides.
Everywhere we're seen the evidences of established business prosperity.
Of course all these things are quite remarkable when it is considered
that about four years ago this entire country was in the hand of the
Indian. The Merchants' Hotel would rank well anywhere. The business
houses are well built, and present a very attractive appearance. There
are several brick blocks, with a great many frame buildings.
"To me the most astonishing feature of the suddenness with which
our citizens drop into regularly organized government was the appear
ance of their courts. Everything was quiet, orderly, and decorous!
Looking about over the Bar, it seemed to me very much like Chicago.
While there, they were trying several of their county officials under
indictments for plundering the public funds, and seemed determined that
they should not escape under any technical pleas.
A TRIP TO DEADWOOD. .657
"Everything seemed to be well-ordered, regular, and stable. One would
look in vain for any of the expected indications of pioneer life. There was
no violence in the street, business seemed to be running along regularly,
and, prosperously. In the immediate vicinity of Deadwood are two thriving
mining cities, known as Lead City and Central City. The drive to each of
these places is a very charming one, and their surroundings as romantic as
possible. In the immediate vicinity of Central City is the famous Father de
Smet Mine. At Lead City are the Homestake No. I and Homestake No. 2.
These two mines, with others, the Golden Terra, for example, are the
property of a very wealthy combination of Californians, and are operated in
a manner that has reduced the cost of the actual production of the gold
itself to the smallest possible result. Immense stamping-mills are erected
there. There has been no effort to bull these mines. Indeed, there seems
to have been a steady effort by their friends rather to depreciate them.
The mines themselves seem to be exhaustless, and, while the ore is of
a low grade, yet it is not in pockets, but comprises practically an entire
mountain, or series of hills, and is handled so cheaply that the net profits
of the business are immense. There are bright, enterprising daily papers
published in Ueadwood. There are fifty to sixty lawyers there, several
churches, and a regular family life. Most of the leading men hava their
families with them. I found among the people of Deadwood as zealous
and interesting politics as in any other portion of the country I have
ever visited."
He found on his return home a letter awaiting him from Hon.
George K. Nash, chairman of the Republican State Committee
of Ohio, inviting him to address some political meeting in that
State. The Governor of the State, Hon. Charles Foster, had
previously written him to the same effect. Invitations to address
political meetings poured in upon him at the same time from
Hon. John C. New, chairman of the Indiana State Committee,
and from various towns in western Illinois, Iowa, and Nebraska,
as soon as his intention to speak at Burlington was known. He
was also invited by the Illinois State Committee to address several
meetings in his own State. The chairman of the Vermont State
Committee also wrote to him in urgent terms. He said: — "We
propose to render the present Presidential campaign the most
aggressive, thorough, and decisive that our people have ever
witnessed. There is a very general desire among our people that
an invitation be extended to you to visit Vermont during the
month of August, and render us such service as you may find it
convenient." He accepted the invitations from Ohio, Indiana,
and Vermont, but it would have been a sheer physical impossi-
42
658 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
bility for him to have attended at one-third of the places from
which he received anxious calls for assistance.
The proposition to nominate him for Congress was renewed
during his absence at Deadwood, and this time the pressure seems
to have been sufficient to induce him to allow his name to be
used as a candidate. He thus announced the fact to Mr. Aldrich :
"July 24, 1880.
" HON. WILLIAM ALDRICH.
"Mv DEAR SIR: Some days since I told you that under no circum
stances would I be a candidate for Congress. Since then, however, I have
been induced to revise my decision, and am after a fashion a candidate.
I have said to some of my friends that they might use my name ; that if
nominated I would stand, and make the best canvass I knew how. I
think it but fair, so pleasant have our relations always been, that I should
say this much to you. "Yours very truly,
"£MERY A STORRS."
The Chicago Times, in announcing Mr. Storrs as a candidate,
said: "Probably the most important political occurrence of yes
terday, in a local or even a broader than local sense, was the
agreement of Emery A. Storrs to permit the use of his name
before the congressional convention in the First district. For a
long time past Mr. Storrs has been urged to make this canvass.
Up to yesterday he had firmly and even peremptorily declined.
Within a few days a very strong pressure has been brought to
bear upon him from quarters where he had reason to expect
opposition. After several long consultations held since Monday
morning, and after he had been visited by representatives of
many leading business interests, Mr. Storrs yielded, upon condi
tion that he would not be asked to take any active part in the
matter. He is about to leave the city for the summer. In Sep
tember he must be in California to meet a professional engage
ment. Later he has engagements in New York, Indiana, and
Ohio. . . The prospect is that Mr. Storrs will have a clear field.
His personal popularity in the district is very great. His candi
dature will be favored by almost every important interest in the
city, and no other gentleman mentioned in connection with the
place will offer any serious obstacle to his nomination.
His nomination and election are therefore regarded as foregone
conclusions. It was a subject of general satisfaction, when the
fact became known, that Chicago is at last to have adequate
A TRIP TO DEADWOOD. 659
representation in something more than a merely commercial
sense."
A correspondent of the Tribune said:
"The city press has made allusion to Emery A. Storrs as a probable
candidate for Congress in the First district in the coming fall election. If
this is so, the people of this great and rapidly growing city should be
congratulated upon their good fortune. After all, material is scarce — for
first class Congressmen. A real live man of genius, a scholar, an orator,
a man, indeed, of national reputation as a lawyer and forensic pleader
second to none, a man whose services are in request from the great cor
porations and business men of the land, — to secure such an one for the
position of Congressman is rare good fortune. We may well marvel that a
professional man, upon whose time a constant demand is made at vastly
superior pay and emoluments to that of Congressman, should be self-sacri
ficing enough to permit the use of his name for such a position. Here is
an instance where the office ought to seek the man, and do it in such a
royal way as to make it, in a sense, obligatory upon him to accept.
"Here is a gentleman who stands alone among lawyers and orators in
the great Northwest, who is the pride of a whole city, the admired even
of his enemies ; a man of the world and of society, a Chesterfield in suav
ity, a knight before the fair, a man who has not, nor does not assume a
false dignity, for he possesses the dignity of a great intellect that needs no
bolstering by any of the pretty artifices of the demagogue or the charlatan.
No parliamentary law point would ever catch him ' off his feet ' or out of
breath. No plausible 'rider' could ever be tacked on to a bill which he
engineered. No sudden debate could find him unprepared. Alert, active,
quick as a flash, without a trace of dogmatism or buffoonery, with a wealth
of epigram, for which he has a national reputation, a courtly manner, ready
wit, polished and elegant yet vigorous and forcible in language, having a
wide acquaintance with public men, an encyclopaedia on matters of current
and ancient history, a man thoroughly versed in the science of law and of
government. He should be nominated by acclamation. There should be no
contest allowed if he can be induced to let his name be used for that
position. He would be among the very few men in Congress whose names
glitter as stars of the first magnitude."
All this negotiation, however, came to nothing. It does not
appear that Mr. Storrs' name was ever presented to the district
convention. His avowed reluctance to enter Congress at the
sacrifice of a valuable and daily increasing professional practice
may have induced another change of mind before the convention
met. It was no secret, moreover, that Mr. Storrs' ambition was
in another direction, and that he had good reason to expect a
Cabinet position. This was the last that was heard of him as a
candidate for Congress.
CHAPTER XXXVIII.
DISRUPTION OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY IN ILLINOIS.
PREPARATIONS FOR THE CAMPAIGN OF l88o — ORGANIZATION OF THE FRIENDS
OF GENERAL GRANT — LETTER OF MR. STORRS ON "OUR SOUTHERN FELLOW-
CITIZENS " — CORRESPONDENCE WITH HON. E. B. WASHBURNE — CORRESPON
DENCE ON THE POLITICAL SITUATION — MR. STORRS* TRIBUTE TO THE OLD
COMMANDER— "THE INDEPENDENT SCRATCHER," AND HIS RECORD— DEFEC
TION OF MR. WASHBURNE — TWO RIVAL COUNTY CONVENTIONS HELD IN
CHICAGO — MR. FARWELL'S RELIANCE ON LUNGS AND VERTEBRAE — THE
ILLINOIS STATE CONVENTION — A FACTION FIGHT — ARGUMENT OF MR.
STORRS ON BEHALF OF THE GRANT DELEGATES — MR. WASHBURNE DISCLAIMS
DISLOYALTY TO GENERAL GRANT — THE STRUGGLE IN THE NATIONAL CON
VENTION — THE BOLTERS WIN.
THE country had become tired of the uncertain policy of
President Hayes administration, and many friends of the
Union were turning once more to the great, silent soldier, to
lead them on against the encroachments of the rebel Democracy.
The situation seemed so full of peril to the national life and
honor that to most thinking Republicans there was but one way
out of the difficulty; no other way but to elect the "still, strong
man," who had been tried and found faithful, to call him once
more to that place in the councils of the nation which he had
filled so well, and to trust him once more in an emergency
which to some looked almost as threatening as in the days
before the outbreak of the rebellion. Now that the lately
rebellious South had been beaten in the field, Mr. Storrs would
have had the government dictate terms to them as to a con
quered minority; and it was with a disgust which he made no
attempt to conceal that he saw the fruits of the Union victories
in the field gradually being snatched away through the weakness
of the men who were now at the helm of the ship of state. The
mischief begun under Johnson was being completed under
660
DISRUPTION OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY IN ILLINOIS. 66 1
Hayes, and the rebel Brigadiers were again in Congress, threat
ening to undo all the legislation which had been enacted for the
purpose of enforcing the constitutional amendments. In this
emergency, the friends of General Grant were organizing in New
York, and other Northern States, and Mr. Storrs and other stal
wart Republicans were anxious to perfect a similar organization
in Illinois. A campaign paper, called The Stalwart, had been
established in Springfield on the first ot January, 1880, and in
acknowledging receipt of a copy of the first number Mr. Storrs
wrote to the editor as follows:
"I received this morning the first number of The Stalwart, and should
have written something for it had it been possible for me to find the time
I put my general views in as compact form as I could command in a
speech made to the soldiers at M'Vicker's theatre during the Grant boom
here. But I do wish to say a few words on the topic ' Our fellow citi
zens of the South.' I am anxious to press the inquiry whether the 'niggers'
and the 'carpet-baggers' are not quite as much our fellow-citizens as the
bulldozer and the unregenerate brigadier. I am a little tired of the ' fellow
citizen' twaddle, and will take an early occasion to give you an article
on that point, — and it is the vital point"
In February, being obliged to go East on a mission in relation
to the tariff on steel rails, Mr. Storrs addressed a letter to his
friend the Hon. Elihu B. Washburne on the political situation.
He still confided implicitly in Mr. Washburne's fidelity to Gen
eral Grant; but remembering that he himself had been one of
the first to put the "Presidential bee" in Mr. Washburne's bon
net, he discussed Mr. Washburne's chances with manly frankness
and candor. The "independent scratchier," the offspring of the
"liberal" of 1872 and the progenitor of the "mugwump" of 1884,
was again a factor in Republican politics. The heterogeneous
class to which this type of politician belonged had begun a
movement in Chicago to select a candidate for the Presidency
on the old plan of "anybody to beat Grant." Mr. Storrs gives
Mr. Washburne his opinion of them :
'•CHICAGO, February 22, 1880.
"Mv DEAR MR. WASHBURNE,
"I have to start for Philadelphia to-night on a very unexpected and a
very sudden call, and shall not be back on the 25th. This I regret exceed
ingly, and had it been possible to have postponed my business at Philadel
phia until after the meeting of the State Committee here, I should certainly
have done so.
662 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
"It is of the utmost importance, in my judgment, that before this Com
mittee, and to it, there should be a full and fearless analysis of the ante
cedents of the gentlemen who are moving against General Grant. It is a
fact worthy of observation that the gentlemen who first met at the Tremont
house on this mission were among themselves unable to agree upon a can
didate whom they could name in his place. Some were for you, some for
Blaine, and others for somebody else. I think that the counsel of a class
of men who arc unable to agree on anything except their antipathies, and
have no harmony of view except in their dislikes, who agree upon noth
ing but opposition, and are unable to agree upon any affirmative line of
policy, is not of a character which would be likely to influence our State
Committee, nor of a kind very desirable for the regulation of the policy of
a great party. So far as the movement in your behalf is concerned, you
can settle that. If you are nominated for President, it will not be because
you are opposed to General Grant, nor will it be because your friends are
opposed to General Grant; but it will be because we are all in favor of
General Grant.
"Moreover, many of these gentlemen were 'liberals,' and large numbers
of them have voted the Republican ticket only on those occasions when it
suited their convenience. Many of them, whom I might name, have been
inckistrious only in seeking to impair the influence of the great leaders of
the party, in criticising the party itself, and in recklessly throwing away
the fruits of all the victories which the party has achieved. The majority
of them were the original 'conciliators,' with whom, I am satisfied, the
mass of the Republican party in this country has no patience whatever.
" I shall probably be back Thursday or Friday, and shall be very glad
to see you very soon after my return. " Very respectfully yours,
"Hon. Elihu B. Washburne. "EMERY A. STORKS."
Three letters, written by him at this time, throw a strong light
upon the political situation in Illinois as viewed from the stalwart
standpoint. They are all dated the 9th of March, 1880. The
first is to Hon. J. K. Edsall, Attorney General of the State of
Illinois, enclosing a stipulation as to time for filing arguments in
a case involving the question of the constitutionality of the game
laws of Illinois. He says:
"On the face of it this is not much of a case, but the lovers of good
shooting, and the lovers of good eating, and that great outlying party
who love neither, but who love the constitution, are profoundly interested
in the result. You are as well aware as I am that the independent
scratcher, the reformer, the Young Men's Republican Club of Boston, and
the conservative in politics, have no stomach nor digestion, but a great,
big, vague, shadowy, impracticable and unmanageable conscience, — a con
science so curiously adjusted that it will burst the Union to save the
constitution. God bless all such asses, and bless God that there are so
few of them. "Ever thine, EMERY A. STORRS."
DISRUPTION OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY IN ILLINOIS. 663
To a friend in Pittsburg he wrote, on the same date:
"The course which Elaine's friends are pursuing in this State is doing
him no good. They are making their warfare on General Grant a personal
one, and that little mob known as the independent scratchers, at a small
meeting which they had at the Tremont House, in this city, were unable
to agree upon anything affirmative, could not decide whom they were for,
and simply knew whom they were against. Such an emasculated lot of
statesmen, who cannot agree to like any one man, but find some o^e
so inevitably their superior that they are unanimous in hating him, cannot
be very effective, I think, in politics.
"I see that the young Republicans in Boston have been and gone and
done it. They recommend as a ticket Hayes and Chamberlain. Governor
Chamberlain of Maine is all right, but I am satisfied that the people of
this country have had enough of limber-backed politicians, and hereafter
want a President of the United States who has for backbone something
more substantial than a rubber string.
" I am studiously avoiding the abuse of anybody liable to be nominated.
I have a pretty good appetite, but do of all things dislike eating my
own conversation. It is the most indigestible food in this world. Some
people like it because they are used to it ; I don't like it, and never shall."
While in Philadelphia he enjoyed for a few brief hours the
society of his friend, the Hon. Benjamin Harris Brewster, after
wards Attorney-General of the United States. To him he writes:
"Mv DEAR MR. BREWSTER, — I received your very pleasant note a few
days since. Very soon after my return home I wrote you, enclosing a
copy of my address to the Irish Republican club of this city. That address
played the devil among the Democratic Irishmen, and large and noisy
preparations were made for what they call a reply. Several office-seeking
and office-holding Irishmen are advertised to reply to me, and our acrobat
ic Mayor, who succeeded in making himself the laughing stock of Congress
for two sessions, and has succeeded equally well, as Mayor of the city of
Chicago, in making himself the laughing stock of the public here, — who, to
express his veneration for the Irish, stated to them sometime since that he
proposed to marry his daughter to an Irishman, — is also anxious to join in
the business of replying.
"With regard to the office-seeking and office-holding Irishmen, ambitious
thus to distinguish themselves, I shall have but a word to say. I know
why they vote the Democratic ticket. The reason for their course lies on
the surface. They vote it because they want office and see no other way
to get it. But solving the difficulty as to them is very far from a solution
of the question as to the millions of Irishmen throughout the country,
working men, who are not seeking office, and who would have no chance
to get it if they were. I shall probably pay my respects to these gentlemen
in due season, and if I do, shall of course send you what I have to say
by way of rejoinder.
"I note what you say about Grant and Washburne, and had with Mr.
664 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
Washburne a long and very pleasant interview on Saturday, telling him
about our delightful ride to Fairmount Park and the chat we had going,
coming, and resting. I shall not soon forget it, and Mr. Washburne was
very much gratified to hear the very pleasant things that you had said of
him and of his great leader General Grant. Now, Mr. Washburne is. as
unanimously, as positively for Grant, as I am. In a letter to some of his
friends in the northern part of this State, who are anxious to organize a
Washburne club, he said: 'I am for General Grant, first, last, all the time.'
"The contingency of W7ashburne being a candidate cannot arise, nor will
he permit it to arise so long as General Grant remains in the field. If I
go to that Convention, I shall go for Grant. I shall have no second choice
and no other choice. I shall go precisely as Washburne would go, but if
the Fates so fix it that General Grant cannot be nominated, I shall then
act as the situation requires ; and when I am compelled to select some
other candidate that other candidate will not be Elaine, nor Sherman, nor
Edmunds, but will be Washburne. He is not now my second choice. Under
such contingency as I have named, he will be my first choice.
"The campaign against General Grant, in the manner in which it is being
waged in this State, has, I am sure, given him strength. It is not a decent
nor an honest warfare, and it will contribute nothing to the strength of Mr.
Elaine, for when it comes to a comparison of characters, and when we
come to determine the question -whether Grant or Elaine may be the most
easily defended, all the defence required for General Grant is to say that
the slanders against him are stale and worn out; that since he left office,
his has been a continual growth ; he has grown through the mists and the
clouds of defamation, and while those fogs may envelope his feet, his head
is in the sunshine. Clouds and mists gather around the base of the moun
tain, but the summit is away above storm and cloud, — is in brightness itself.*
" I do most sincerely hope that you may be here during the Convention.
I hope, and my wife joins me in the hope, that Mrs. Brewster may accom
pany you, and we will try to make your stay here so pleasant that you
will be constrained to come again."
Mr. Storrs again wrote to Mr. Washburne, who was staying
at the Hot Springs, Arkansas, for the benefit of his health, as
follows :
* This letter is one of the rare instances of unconscious assimilation and
' reproduction on Mr. Storrs' part of a figure familiar to every reader. He
evidently had in mind the beautiful lines which Dr. Johnson contributed
to Goldsmith's "Deserted Village:"
"As some tall cliff that lifts its awful form
Swells from the vale, and midway leaves the storm,
Though round its breast the rolling clouds are spread,
Eternal sunshine settles on its head."
Yet he has paraphrased them so well, and applied the illustration so
happily to General Grant's political career, that he may be said to have
fairly made it his own.
DISRUPTION OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY IN ILLINOIS. 665
"April 6, 1880.
"MY DEAR MR. WASHBURNE: Unless I am very greatly mistaken, the
work of organizing General Grant's friends in this State ought not to be
delayed another day. We are going to have pleasant weather here now.
Don't you think you have had enough of Hot Springs? I am merely a
private, and not a very high one at that. I am looking for an officer to
take orders from, and so are thousands of others in this State.
"Yours very truly, "EMERY A. STORRS.
"Hon. E. B. Washburne, Hot Springs."
He wrote the same day to Senator Logan :
"Mv DEAR SENATOR: . . Can you tell me why there is no organization
of General Grant's friends in this State.' I think the time has come for us
o be doing something, and doing that something thoroughly. Am I not
right about this?"
On the Qth, Mr. Storrs wrote a jubilant note to General Stew
art L. Woodford of New York, announcing the event :
"April 9, 1880.
"MY DEAR GENERAL:
"Look out for a renewal of the Grant boom in this city next week,
which will, I think, put an end to all doubts in all quarters as to the atti
tude of this State. We shall probably have next week one of the finest
demonstrations for General Grant that have ever been had anywhere for
anybody. How about the Vice Presidency?"
The meeting in Central Music Hall was admitted, even by the
Elaine organs, to have been a triumphant success. It was presi
ded over by Mr. Robert T. Lincoln. One Elaine paper said of
it: " Viewed from the stage, the scene was a brilliant one. The
attendance of ladies was quite large. Many of the best seats in
the dress circle and first balcony, and all those in the private
boxes, were occupied by the fair sex, who were attentive listen
ers, and waved their handkerchiefs and clapped their hands at
the mention of their particular presidential candidate." General
Logan made the first speech, and ably answered the ingenious
objections which had been trumped up by the Elaine men
against the nomination of General Grant. He reminded the
audience that Grant's personal integrity was unquestioned; that
if he had made mistakes in the appointment of some of his
civil officers, he would not be so liable to repeat them as the
man who had never been tested and never had an opportunity
to make mistakes; and that there was no constitutional bar to
666 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
prevent the people from trusting him with the highest office of
the republic once again, as they had trusted him when the life
of the nation was in peril. It was not a question of the term
but of the man. Sometimes the American people had elected a
President but once, because they did not want him a second
time; sometimes they did not elect the man at all, because
they did not even want him for a first term. There was but
one living man who could break the " solid South," and that
man was U. S. Grant. He had already beaten them in the
field; and every soldier, every soldier's widow, every soldier's
orphan, knew Grant's plume. The last objection which he
noticed was the cry of Caesarism; and that pitiful sophism he
tore to shreds, with a few plain, honest words. Mr. Storrs
was next called upon, and spoke as follows :
"I can say without the slightest degree of extravagance that it has
never been the fortune of any man to face, on a political occasion, an
audience more splendid in enthusiasm, grander in its tone and quality, than
the vast assemblage gathered here to-night. It is an audience called
together on no common occasion and assembled for no ordinary purpose.
It is an audience of the leading men and women of the chiefest city of the
great Northwest. It is an audience gathered together here in an emergency
to protect the fair escutcheon of the great State of Illinois from an impend
ing stab of dishonor, and, God knows, it will protect it. It is an audience
gathered to celebrate the praises of no common man, an audience met
from all over this State, merely to testify what all the world has testified,
that we have in our midst the chiefest citizen of the world. And the
broad-browed men of Chicago that have, within the period of nine years,
lifted it from ashes and made it the proudest city of the world, seated like
a queen enthroned by the shore of her great lake, have no apologies to
offer because they are here to-night demanding the nomination of U. S.
Grant. The city of Chicago, Mr. Chairman, never begged a favor ; it
never won a fight that it didn't win in front, and it never yet trembled in
the presence of an adversary. The city of Chicago is a great Republican
city; it is the imperial city of the carpet-bagger who has carved out in
this Western. world, within the period of twenty-five years, an empire the
most splendid that the sun in all his course shines upon, an empire of the
light of which the independent scratcher never dreamed. [Great applause.]
"Who is this man that has called this vast audience together, utterly
untitled, who holds no office, who wields no patronage, who manages no
bureau? He is a great, majestic prince, enthroned in the hearts of 48,000,-
000 of people. He reigns there by their suffrages; and this side the
Plutonian region of Democracy, this side the Purgatorial region of the half
way house of independentism, there is no man to molest or make him afraid.
1 speak to-night not alone of this hero. I cannot speak for this great citizen
DISRUPTION OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY IN ILLINOIS. 66/
without speaking of the Republican party. From boyhood up to manhood
I have been and am a member of that party, stalwart at the outset and
stalwart now, perpendicular as a ramrod, believing in its faith in the inner
most recesses of my soul, never doubting that from its birth down to this
hour its supremacy has been absolutely essential to the well-being of this
country. I talk, then, of that grand old party ; I talk of its grand leader,
as grand as the party and as great. I can say, that when I look back on
our history I can discern a great party which has for a quarter of a century
preserved its identity; a party often depressed, never extinguished; a party
which, though often tainted with the faults of the age, has always been in
advance of the age ; a party which, though guilty of some errors, has the
glory of having established our liberties on a firm foundation ; and of that
party I am proud to be a member. It was that party which, at the very
threshhold of its career, confronted the shameful doctrine that freedom was
sectional and slavery was national, rescued the Territories from the grasp of
slavery, and dedicated them forever after to freedom — to free men, free
thought, and free speech. It is that party which, in vindication of its ideas of
freedom, elected Lincoln President of the United States; which found treason in
every department of the government ; which found its fleet scattered over every
sea ; its arsenals plundered, its forts in the hands of traitors, its little army
shivered to fragments ; which found every branch of the public service par
alyzed, the national flag dishonored even when flying over its own forts ; which
found hostile armies arrayed against it; which, compelled to appeal to the
patriotism of the people for national salvation, made the appeal ; which met
an armed rebellion vast in extent and malignant in spirit ; which saved this
nation to be the custodian of free government among men. It is that. party
which, true to the great cause which it represented, made the promise of
freedom to the slave and kept that promise good. It is that party which,
when the war for national preservation closed in victory, declared that
forever after slavery should be extirpated from the soil of the republic ;
which declared that all persons born beneath the flag, or naturalized here,
should be citizens ; which guaranteed to all citizens equality of civil and
political privileges; which placed beyond the possibility of repudiation our
national debt, and made firm and secure the national credit. It is that
party which has restored our currency/ and made every paper dollar in the
pockets of the laboring man worth one hundred cents. It is that party
which compelled the British Government to pay to our own people millions
of money, for damages inflicted upon our commerce by rebel cruisers fitted
out in their ports. It is that party which by wise legislation has sought the
execution of all our constitutional guarantees to the citizen, the purity of the
ballot-box, and the protection of the polls against violence, terrorism, and
fraud. It is that party which has ranked among its leaders the purest
patriotism, the stanchest courage, the wisest thought, the best culture, and
the loftiest statesmanship of the nation, and among its rank and file that
solid citizenship which demands just and honest government, and will be
satisfied with nothing less. I look with pride on all that the Republican
party has done for the cause of human freedom. I see it now hard pressed,
668 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
struggling with difficulties, but still fighting the good fight. At its head I
see men who have inherited the spirit and the virtues, as well as the blood,
of the old champions and martyrs of freedom. I see presiding here to-night
the only living son and descendant of Abraham Lincoln, whose name and
whose memory are enshrined in every patriotic heart. I see here to-night
the son of that great patriot statesman, Stephen A. Douglas, who, when
treason raised its hands, cast party to the winds, stood like a rock for the
Union, and died with patriotic words upon his lips. I look at the call in
obedience to which this magnificent audience is assembled, and see at its
head a name which we all delight to honor ; one steadfast and ever reliable
as a legislator, wise in counsel, prompt in action, earnest in opinion, daunt
less in courage, incorruptible in integrity ; who for nearly twenty years
maintained the honor of our State in the councils of the nation, always
speaking for freedom ; who for eight years dignified and honored the Amer
ican name and character abroad, and who, as Minister to France, during
the terrible siege of Paris, when every other foreign representative had fled,
remained faithful at his post, gathering in safety under his country's flag
the citizens of every land who sought the protection of its sheltering folds
— Elihu B. Washburne. To the same call I see the name of the peerless
soldier, the ever-faithful Republican, the true man, the firm friend, the
stalwart Senator, the smiter of treason, — John A. Logan. The last words of
the great Michigan Senator, Chandler, patriotic and eloquent words, uttered
the languag^ of this call, and declared, with Lincoln and Douglas and
Logan and Washburne, that he, too, believed that the success of the Repub
lican party would be best promoted by the nomination and election of
Ulysses S. Grant as President of the United States. The millions of oppressed,
bullied, and terrorized Republicans of the South, white and black, speak
the same sentiment. To this party — to these men — I propose to attach
myself; and, while one shred of the old banner is left flying, by that ban
ner will I at least be found.
"I confess that I am not independent of these considerations. I have
not scaled, and shall not attempt to scale, those dizzy heights from which I
could look down upon them. I am content to remain in the valleys, where
I find such company as I have named, rather than to seek those drearier
and colder, if loftier, mountain peaks to which that select few aspire who
profess to see in the nomination and election of General Grant as President
of the United States dangers which the wisdom of the country is not able
to perceive. Who am I, to threaten that wisdom, patriotism, experience,
and intelligence, that unless it surrenders its opinions for mine I will refuse
obedience to orders, and bolt the ticket? This colossal egotism is called
'independence.' The man who parades it is known as the 'independent
scratchier,' independent of the party to which he belongs save when the
minority to which he is attached can rule ; whose ticket he votes, whose
principles he condescendingly espouses, and whose candidates he patroniz
ingly supports at spasmodic intervals, the recurrence of which it is given
to no one to foretell. I do not include among the 'independent scratchers'
those true Republicans who honestly prefer the nomination by the forth-coming
DISRUPTION OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY IN ILLINOIS. 669
National Republican Convention of some other candidate than General
Grant. Those true and earnest Republicans who prefer either Mr. Wash-
burnc, or Mr. Sherman, or Mr. Blaine, or Mr. Edmunds will surely find
the claims of their favorites fairly considered by that convention, and will
as surely support its nominee as I am sure to support him, not haltingly,
and unwillingly, but with whole soul and in dead earnest. The friends of
General Grant do not bolt, and they neither boast nor threaten ; but they
do better — they succeed. The 'independent scratcher' is either that ambi
tious young man very proud of knowing what older and wiser men have
found it convenient to forget, or that ambitious man of any age who, itching
for notoriety, must find some one more distinguished and greater than him
self to scratch.
"In 1864 the 'independent scratcher' in the State of Illinois engaged in a
scheme to force the withdrawal of Abraham Lincoln, and attempted to
carry through our State convention at Springfield a resolution condemning
Lincoln and his administration. The outraged patriotism and good sense
of the people, the dangers of insurrection in our very midst, frightened the
'independent scratcher' back into the ranks which he attempted to desert.
"In 1872 the 'independent scratchers,' wretchedly in the minority, orga
nized a free-trade and revenue reform party at Cincinnati, but at its head
the most rabid and ultra protectionist, and the bitterest hater of the Demo
cratic party on earth, and in a body melted into the Democratic fold.
[Laughter.] The combination was terribly beaten. Many of them returned
to us in 1876, and we were well nigh defeated; and but for the fact that
there was then at the head of the government a man with whom no one
could either trifle or trade, surrounded by a Cabinet inspired by his own
courage and patriotism, the nation would have been involved in another
rebellion. From this coalition thousands of honest, earnest, but deceived,
Republicans have withdrawn themselves. They have by years of faithful
service expiated their offense. They are with us now. They are here
to-night, and after having once tested the bitter fruits of bolting experience,
they are comfortably back in the old mansion, feeling 'themselves again,'
and determined to never wander more.
"General Grant is to-day, and has been for the past three years, a pri
vate citizen, out of office, with no patronage at his disposal, resting his
claims purely upon his strength with the people as a man. It is idle to
talk of the precedents of our history, for our history furnishes no precedent.
There is no instance in our history where a President, after holding the
office for two successive terms, retires to the ranks of private citizenship,
and is afterward called upon to again fill the position. Washington retired
after serving two terms. Jefferson did also, and declined a successive nomi
nation for a third term after it became clear that it was impossible for him
to secure it. Madison held the office two terms, and no renomination was
tendered him. Jackson held the office two terms, and no renomination was
tendered him. Grant held the office two terms, retired at the close of his
second term. After an interval of four years, a nomination is again ten
dered him, for which our history furnishes no precedent whatever. Why
6/O LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
should the people of this country, after having had four years' opportunity
to calmly and justly judge the man, be deprived by a sentimental objection
of this character of his services, through another trying period in our his
tory ? Who has made such a law ! With a wider experience and a riper
judgment than he ever before possessed, with an emergency upon us through
which we know he could safely carry us, who is there to say the majority
of this people shall not again elevate the private citizen of their choice
into the highest place? The people of this country have never found any
difficulty in ridding themselves of a President whom they did not like, at
the end of his first term. They found no difficulty in retiring both the
Adamses, Van Buren, Polk, Pierce, Buchanan, and Johnson, after they
had served one term. The people have never yet made a mistake in elect
ing an incumbent to the second term. They have made several mistakes
in electing a man to the first term. Quick to discover such a mistake,
however, they never repeat it. The people of this country are better judges
of the fitness of their public servants than any little band of philosophers
who have vexed us with their theories. Conceding that there is no Con
stitutional objection to the election of General Grant, it is still urged that it
is unduly honoring one man at the expense of all the others. I am in
favor of General Grant's nomination — not to honor him but to benefit the
country. This great office is to be filled, not for the accommodation of the
individual, but to promote the public interests. It is not, as some people
seem to conceive, an office to be passed around among certain invited
guests like refreshments at a picnic, but a great office, to be filled for the
public good. [Cheers.]
"While the friends of General Grant sincerely believe that there is before
us such an emergency as can best be filled by him, — while they sincerely
believe that his election will do more to insure quiet and a finally just solu
tion of our political troubles than that of any other Republican, — while
they believe that he possesses the confidence of the people North and South
in a larger measure than any other man in the nation, — they do not believe,
and they are very far from saying, that he is the only man whom the
Republican party can elect. But it nevertheless is true that the most seri
ous problem in our politics to-day and for the future grows out of the con
stant menace of a solid South. Who can divide that solid South, and thus
solve the problem ? I do say that General Grant is the only man in all
this country who can solve the problem of the solid South by dividing the
South, so that it shall not be solid. I do say that he is the only man in
all this country whom the Republican party can nominate for whom the
negro will risk his life and property to vote. I do say that he can carry
three and probably five Southern States, and can divide the vote in all the
others, and that no other Republican can carry one. If Grant is nomina
ted, the negro will vote, and will vote for him. If he is not nominated,
the negro will not vote at all. If Grant is nominated, the terrorized and
outraged Southern white Republican will vote, and vote for him. If he is
not nominated, he will not vote at all.
"The country demands for its leader a man whose very name stands for
DISRUPTION OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY IN ILLINOIS. 6/1
peace, whose very presence is a restraint upon the law-breaker. Grant
means peace. He smote secession hip and thigh in open warfare ; it fears
him now as it feared him then ; it respects him now as it respected him
then. I am doing no injustice to any living man when I say that for all
such emergencies General Grant fills the requirements of the occasion in a
larger measure than any other living man. It is idle to claim that all our
dangers are past, because during the present session of Congress the Demo
cratic party has suspended for the time the prosecution of its revolutionary
schemes. The very fact that Grant is the probable candidate of the
Republican party, and that the complete development of their schemes
would render his nomination a certainty, has awed them into silence, and
they stand, even in his prospective presence, tongue-tied and dumb before
the world.
"This great character stands forth to-day bright and shining, the admira
tion of the world. Palsied be the hand which would strike it, and blistered
the tongue which would defame it! It is not merely because he is so well
worthy of this great honor, but because we sincerely believe that more than
any other man can he serve his country and promote its best interests in
that position. From first to last he has never known defeat. [Applause.]
His record from Belmont to Appomattox is one unbroken chain of victories
which honored his country and secured for himself the admiration of his
foes. He never left a duty unperformed. He never made a promise which
he did not keep. He never turned his back upon a friend. There is more
wisdom in his silence than in the speech of most men. There is not a
boast in all his long and splendid career. Bitterly and malignantly as he
has been assailed, no word of slander ever escaped his lips. Prudent and
cautious in counsel, he never fails to act when a conclusion has been
reached, and is as prompt in action as he is prudent in preparation. In
his first inaugural he met the clamor for an inflated currency by a demand
for the payment of our National debt in coin, and by his veto struck a
blow at all schemes for a depreciated currency from which they never
recovered. He inaugurated and carried through a plan of peaceful arbitra
tion by which grave international disputes were settled, and made our flag
and our country respected throughout the world. As modest as he was
great, he never set his individual judgment against the clearly expressed
public will, but renouncing his desire he declared that he had no policy
opposed to the will of the people. Leaving his high office, he has made
the circuit of the globe, and has been received under every flag with such
honors as no man ever received before. Unaffected by them, he never for
one moment lost that wonderful pose which has carried him through so
many great events. Returning home, thus honored and thus laureled, the
brave, the honest, the patriotic, the modest soldier, statesman, and citizen,
places all these honors in the hands of his countrymen.
" There is no elevation so high that he is dizzied by it. There is no
place so low and humble which he may fill that he does not uncomplain
ingly and faithfully perform all its duties.
6/2 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
' Draw him strictly so
That all who view the place may know
He needs no trappings of fictitious fame.'
"This is our true knight, 'without fear, without reproach.' and without a
plume. Here, in his own State, — here in the chief city of that State, have the
thousands who are assembled here to-night met, not to place fresh laurels
upon his brow, not to add an additional honor to his long roll of honors,
by uttering the voice of his own State in his behalf in National Convention,
but to save the State from such a dishonor as any halting upon our part
would surely reflect upon it. [Applause.]
" He has enemies here, as had Lincoln and Douglas before him. They can
and they will be silenced. Joining hands with the other States, Illinois shall
stand in the line and shall utter her voice for her honored citizen. Assailing
no competitor, the rank and file, the Old Guard, declare that they are for
Grant, because again and again have they marched under his banners, but
never to defeat, — and every battlefield over which his flag ever floated was
a field of victory. The work of our great leader is not finished, and will
not be until he has led the hosts of freemen to that future, when there
shall be within all the boundaries of the Republic not one foot of ground
over which the flag floats and upon which a citizen stands who may not
speak, and think, and vote as he pleases. Prostrate to-day are millions of
our fellow-citizens, our equals before the law, but shorn of that equality.
Under the banners of our chosen leader shall they be lifted up ?
" When justice reigns throughout all our borders, and every citizen, white
and black, stands equal before the law, when North and South, and East
and West, there shall be found no privileged class ; then, ' let us have
, peace;' that Peace which shall come to us with her silken banners floating
in every breeze, with Justice and Mercy bearing her train. Justice to all,
friend and foe. Such a peace leaves no traces of bitterness behind it, and
smiling fields and the roar of thriving cities, and the hum of busy machin
ery, and happy homes, and a prosperous and prospering people mark its
pathway, and better than all, and grander than all else, there shall be in
all its march neither shackled wrists nor fettered tongues." [Great cheering.]
The uncertainty of political alliances is proverbial. It was con
spicuously illustrated in the campaign of 1880. There were
many who believed, after the National Convention, that Garfield
.had "sold out" John Sherman. There are not a few who still
. believe that if Mr. Washburne's wiser judgment had not been
upset by the Presidential bee buzzing in his bonnet, and if he
had held his followers in Illinois together in support of Grant,
the result of that convention would have been very different.
The "old guard" would have given their votes for him in the
event that a nomination of General Grant became impossible ;
but his followers alienated them from the first by voting all the
DISRUPTION OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY IN ILLINOIS. 673
way through against Grant, and found themselves at last an
isolated handful, — not enough even to hold the "balance of
power." About a month before the meeting of the National
Convention, and a week before the meeting of the Cook County
convention for the election of delegates to the State convention,
there were whisperings in the air that the Washburne men were
opposed to Grant. In the first week of May, Mr. Storrs wrote
to a friend suggesting that Mr. Washburne should be induced
to make a speech in support of General Grant's nomination.
In that letter he said:
"We are having trouble here with Washburne. While he professes
great friendship for General Grant, he nevertheless fails to control his
friends, who are all for somebody else. Saturday evening, at a meeting
of the Republican club of the i8th ward, where Washburne lives, and
of which club his son is secretary, resolutions were adopted presenting
Washburne' s name for the Presidency. We are naturally tired of this
nonsense, and mean to bring him to a head. He goes to Springfield
with General Grant, and at General Grant's request. While there he
must make a speech. . . Take hold of this matter, see that it is done,
and you will have 'done the State some service.' Don't wait, for \Vash-
burne to agree to speak, but call him out."
The gentleman addressed in this letter was a warm personal
friend of General Grant, and he immediately responded:
"There must be no failure to carry the State for General Grant by a
decided majority. I hope you will carry Cook solid for the 'old man.'
It would be an infernal disgrace to the State to allow the ' Plumed
Knight' or any other fellow to get any portion of the delegation. I am
more for Grant than ever before. As — would say, I am ' powerful fond
of him.' '
In a couple of days afterwards, Mr. Storrs received from the
same gentleman a piece of startling information.
"The most systematic efforts," he said, "were made here yesterday to
get Mr. \Vashburne to make a speech, but all in vain. He declined to
ride from the Mansion to the State House with General Grant. He and
General Smith (State Treasurer Smith) walked over to the State House,
and mingled in the crowd. After Grant concluded his remarks, we made
long and loud calls for Washburne ; but no response from the said
Washburne. . He hurried away to Boston on the Wabash train at 9 p. m."
This defection on the part of Mr. Washburne, whom he had
all along regarded as the strongest supporter General Grant had
in the State of Illinois, was always a sore disappointment to Mr.
Storrs. On the loth of May, the Cook County convention was
43
6/4 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORRS.
held in Farwell Hall, when the opposition to General Grant
materialized in an unexpected way. After being called to order
by the chairman of the county committee, a motion to nominate
a chairman of the convention was made by a man not a dele
gate, seconded by another who was not a delegate, and the first
step was thus taken to capture the convention in the interests of
the "independent" anti-Grant faction. The chairman was hustled
off the platform, and his place usurped by the nominee already
mentioned, — Mr. Anthony. This was done in obedience to the
advice given by Mr. Charles B. Farwell to a caucus of malcon
tents held early in the morning. He told the caucus that the
chairman of the county committee would, of course, in accord
ance with custom, nominate a temporary chairman, and the
friends of no other candidate but General Grant would have
an opportunity to put forward a name for the chairmanship.
This programme was duly carried out. As soon as Mr.
Singer called the convention to order, and nominated a tem
porary chairman, he was at once interrupted, was unable to be
heard, and a scene of great confusion ensued. The proceedings
being so tumultuous that no business could be conducted,
Mr. Singer declared the convention adjourned, to meet at the
club-room of the Palmer House; and all the Grant delegates left
the hall in a body. The party whom they left behind finally
selected a divided delegation pledged in favor of Elaine and
Washburne. Meanwhile, the regular body assembled at the
Palmer House, and chose a full delegation pledged for Grant.
Mr. Storrs was not present at the disorderly scenes in Farwell
Hall, but attended the convention at the Palmer House, and in
response to loud calls, made a stirring speech, which was
interrupted by loud applause at every sentence. He said:
"I learned but a few minutes since that the chronic political revolver,
the chronic political renegade, the bolter of 1872, and of all other years, —
the intermediate and preceding years, — the political dyspeptic, the
Republican hysteric, the man who is with the party in the sunshine,
and is under the band-wagon in the storm — [laughter, and "three
cheers for Storrs"] — had decided that thousands of the Republicans,
of Cook County are to be disfranchised, and in order to accomplish
that purpose has resorted to schemes which the reformer in politics qnly
adopts, — the schemes of the demagogue and the revolutionary. The
Republican party of this city has been threatened, terrorized, and bullied
steadily for the past three months. The time has come when the true,
DISRUPTION OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY IN ILLINOIS. 6/3
steadfast Republicans of Cook County perhaps may be threatened in the
future, but shall be bullied no longer. I have never bolted a Republican
ticket, and I probably never shall. I have always supported its candidates,
and I probably always shall. The regular convention of Cook county,
regularly called, has been driven by force from the quarters assigned
to it, and has now assembled here. The gathering at Farwell Hall is
in no sense a convention ; it is a mob, and disputing at this instant as to
its leadership, and the dispute carried on with policemen as umpires.
[A voice: "Fact! They haven't got a chairman yet."] If it takes a
reformer in our politics four solid hours to determine who shall be chair
man, about how long will it take them to nominate Elaine to the Presidency
of the United States ?
"The Cook county convention is here, and it is the accredited voice of
the Republican party of the city of Chicago. The other is a disorganized
mob at Farwell Hall. They have unseated the regular authority by force,
fraud, and violence, and are at this moment disputing, under the umpire-
ship of the police force of the city of Chicago, who shall head them. They
have not determined this question, who shall head us. [Cheers.] Now,
we shall make no mistake by the exercise of all the courage which we
possibly can command. When we act directly within the precedents and
traditions of our party, we shall make no mistake at all. Just so long as
the whole rank and file are true to its precedents and true to its traditions,
you need make no inquiries what the result will be. Do what your judg
ment tells you is right, and you will make no mistake. Then, when you
go down to the State Convention held at Springfield, bring with you the
credentials of this, the only regularly organized County Convention of Cook
County, and the Republicans of this great State, who are for Grant and
are against fraud, [applause] will pulverize finer than powder any organi
zation headed by Charles B. Farwell. [Applause.]
"We have got a majority in this State ; it is ours; it belongs to us, and I
am in favor of using that majority for all that the term implies. The time
has not yet come when any organization of revolvers, and disorganizers can
affix a stain upon the escutcheon of Illinois so ineffaceable as that would
be, to repudiate the foremost citizen of the world, who is our citizen.
(Applause.] The time has not yet come when a Republican convention
assembled as this is shall take counsel of its fears, or with hesitating judg
ment, trembling lip, and shrinking nerve, hold back one instant from the
straight line that is open before it, which is, to give its expression to what
is known to be the will of the State and of the nation at large, and act,
as it is, like a convention. Select your delegates. If there is a majority
of Grant men in this convention, select ninety -two delegates that are for
Grant, and who have no second choice. [Applause.] I would not give a
rye straw for a man with a second choice ; the man with a second choice
is worthless for his first choice. Select ninety -two delegates from Cook
County, sent by the only convention now in existence, — this convention, —
speaking and voting for Grant first, last, and all the time. [Applause.]
And with such a delegation you will find that in the convention that assem-
676 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
bles here in Chicago no second choice will ever be called for. All there
is about it, then, is to go ahead without being bullied, safely within the
precedents of the party ; do as we have done in the days that have passed ;
stand right straight up, and no harm will come to you. Imitate the exam
ple of our great leader. You see the enemy before you — move immediately
upon his works." [Laughter and applause.]
The State Convention assembled at Springfield on the iQth
of May, and there were two rival delegations from Cook
County, each claiming to be the only authorized and only
legitimate representation of the county. Seats were given them
in the gallery until the report of the committee on credentials
was made. That committee had the question under consideration
for nearly a day and a half, and finally presented three reports,
one recommending the seating of fifty-six of the Farwell Hall
delegates and thirty-six of the Palmer House delegation; another
recommending the seating of the entire Palmer House delegation,
and a third recommending the seating of the entire Farwell
Hall delegation. Upon the presentation of these reports to
the State Convention, time was allotted to each side to present
its case through its own chosen representatives, and both sides
were fully and thoroughly heard. The adoption of the report
recommending the seating of the entire Farwell Hall delegation
was advocated by Mr. Kirk Hawes, and Mr. Storrs was then
introduced to state the case on behalf of the Palmer House party.
The Illinois State Register, a Democratic paper published at
Springfield, thus describes the debate:
"The speech of Emery A. Storrs was an extraordinary effort. It lacked
the clinching logic of Hawes' arguments, but was surpassingly brilliant,
burnished, as it was, by the genius of the orator and of the poet. Mr.
Storrs exhibited his gifts to the best advantage. He bore down upon the
rioters, the bribe-givers and bribe-takers of Chicago with all the blazonry
of his unequalled powers of denunciation, of ridicule, of sarcasm, of humor,
leaping the difficult places in his pathway by a glowing appeal for Grant,
an apotheosis of Republican stalwartism, a shining tribute to the flag ; and
crowned his cause with a trumpet-tongued cry for harmony, for conciliation,
for peace, that won his audience, and supplied an ample apology for the
claim which he so fervently espoused. He wanted only thirty-six of the
ninety-two delegates — wanted them in the name of justice, in the name of
popular rights, and above all, in the name of the great leader who had
done more for his country than any other living man, and whose splendid
form towered into the very sunshine of eternal fame. The orator closed his
speech with a peroration, the classic finish of which, though capping a
faulty argument, was worthy of Sheridan in the British Parliament, or of
DISRUPTION OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY IN ILLINOIS. 6//
Seargent S. Prentiss, when, pleading for his contested seat as a representa
tive, he electrified the American Congress forty years ago. The victory was
complete. The orator had swept triumphantly the chords of human passion,
and the vote then promptly taken gave Grant all that had been claimed for
him in Cook county. This episode in Illinois politics sets a notable precedent
in party organization, and illustrates the highest ingenuity of party leader
ship."
No action was taken upon the report claiming the entire Cook
county delegation for Grant. The Republican State Committee
of Illinois, in 1876, had adopted for Cook county the plan of
having its delegates vote in the State convention, not as a county,
but by senatorial districts. Cook county included seven senatorial
districts, three of which were carried by the stalwarts, and they
also claimed a majority in the second district. It was admitted
that the others had been carried by the opponents of Grant, and
all that the Palmer House party wanted was fair play and a just
representation.
The report advocated by Mr. Hawes was rejected by a majority
of eighty votes. The question then came up on the report
recommending the admission of fifty-six of the Farwell Hall
delegation, and thirty-six of the Palmer House delegation, which
was adopted by a majority of eighty; whereupon the admitted
delegates took their seats in the convention. The same evening,
Senator Logan sent the following telegram to Mrs. Storrs in
Chicago :
" I most heartily congratulate you on the magnificent speech
of your husband in favor of seating the Grant delegates.
"JoHN A. LOGAN."
It had become apparent to Mr. Washburne himself by this
time that the preference of the Republican party of Illinois was
overwhelmingly for General Grant, and without the support of
his own State Washburne could not hope to win the Presidency.
He therefore published a card in a paper at Portland, Maine,
where he was then staying, in which he said: "All combinations
alleged to have been made by my friends and those of other
candidates have been entered into without my knowledge or appro
bation." Two days before the meeting of the Illinois State con
vention, he sent the following telegram to a friend in Galena:
"Too unwell to attend to anything, but express to all my
friends my earnest hope that they will support General Grant."
6/8 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
The Springfield convention having been organized, a resolution
was offered that the delegates to the National Convention be
selected by a committee of one from each Congressional district,
to be appointed by the chair. This motion led to discussions,
consuming many hours, and was finally adopted by a majority.
The chairman named a committee, who recommended as dele
gates to the National Convention forty-two gentlemen, whose
names were approved by the majority. No other names were
submitted to the State convention, but protests were filed from
several Congressional districts just before the convention closed.
General Logan offered a resolution declaring U. S. Grant to be
the choice of the Republican party of Illinois for the Presidency,
and instructing the delegates to use all honorable means to secure
his nomination, which was carried amid the wildest enthusiasm.
The national Convention met in Chicago on the 2nd of June.
It was the longest and most exciting convention that had ever
been held in the history of the party. There were contesting
delegations from several States. The most important contest
was that for the representation of the State of Illinois, — the third
State in the Union, so far as her numerical representation in a
National political convention was concerned. A committee on
credentials was appointed, to whom all questions as to the right
of delegates to their seats was referred, and of this committee a
majority did not favor the nomination of General Grant. The
malcontents at Springfield brought their protests before this
committee, and sought to overturn the decision of the Illinois
State convention. The committee held long and fatiguing ses
sions, the bolters being represented before them by Mr. Hawes,
and the straight Republicans by Mr. Storrs. They returned a
majority and minority report. The former was in favor of seat
ing the delegates named by private caucuses of the bolting dis
tricts, outside of the State convention, and sustained the Grant
delegates for the second district, and the delegates for the State
at large chosen by the State convention, against the objections
made to them. The minority report, so far as it related to the
State of Illinois, was prepared by Mr. Storrs. It recited all the
history of the Farwell Hall usurpation, the frauds perpetrated at
the primary elections in several districts, and the action of the
State convention, and thoroughly reviewed the situation.
DISRUPTION OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY IN ILLINOIS. 679
When these reports were presented in the National Convention,
a lively breeze was at once raised by General Logan, who
demanded to know by what right the majority of the committee
presumed to pass upon the credentials of the delegates at large
from Illinois, of whom he was one and Mr. Storrs another. He
had never heard that there was any question as to them. Mr.
Conger of Michigan, the chairman of the committee, explained
that a " communication," had been sent to them purporting to
contest the rights of the delegates at large from the State of
Illinois, but that the committee, after considering it, had decided
that there was no valid contest, and that the gentlemen chosen
by the State Convention were entitled to their seats. This
would not satisfy General Logan. He and his brother delegates
claimed their seats by virtue of their credentials from the State
convention, and would not accept them through any tolerance
of the committee on credentials. On the motion of General
Sharpe of New York, the paragraph relating to the Illinois dele
gates at large was expunged as superfluous. Some amusement
was created during the discussion of the question by a member
of the committee, saying that the committee had sat up til"}
three o'clock in the morning listening to Mr. Storrs on that
point. "Why," he said, "my venerable friend from Pennsylvania
[Mr. Cessna], and several others of the members of that com
mittee, whom we all delight to love and honor, sat there until
t\vo or three o'clock in the morning, — and those gentlemen have
not been awake at that hour for the last ten or fifteen years, I
am informed, — kept there by the eloquence of the gentleman
who was pleading the cause of the gentlemen from Illinois."
The obnoxious paragraph was expunged, and all question as
to the rights of the delegates at large to their seats removed.
On the motion of Mr. Cessna of Pennsylvania, the report was
considered in detail. After the Alabama case had been disposed
of, the Illinois contest was taken up. Mr. Conger, as chairman
of the committee on credentials, made an explanation of the
considerations which had influenced the majority to report as
they had done. General Raum, the chairman of the Illinois
State convention, defended the action of that body. Mr. Elliott
Anthony was heard on behalf of Farwell Hall, and Mr. Storrs
answered him as the authorized representative of the sitting dele-
68O LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
gates. The argument of Mr. Storrs was one of great power and
appeared in full in the official report of the Convention.
Mr. Storrs was interrupted by a hurricane of applause from
the stalwarts in the galleries as he drew his masterly address to
its conclusion. The Blame men responded with yells and cat
calls. The stalwarts cheered again with renewed vigor, and a scene
of tumult and uproar followed such as has never before or since
been witnessed in a great National Convention. Senator Conk-
ling, the leader of the New York delegation, made an emphatic
gesture of approval, and looked delightedly round as the stal
warts began to strip the flags from the front of the galleries and
wave them wildly about, in which they were imitated by the
Blaine men in the opposite gallery. Delegates rushed excitedly
through the hall, interchanging jubilations with other delegations,
and some groups started singing patriotic songs. The Babel
lasted nearly an hour, during which the chairman's gavel was
powerless to restore order. The chairman availed himself of a
lull in the storm to say. "The question is on the adoption of
the report. The gentleman has only four minutes of his hour
remaining." Mr. Storrs, who had remained standing on the
elevated platform, looking placidly around him during all the
excitement, turned to the chairman, and smilingly said. " Please
give me these four minutes. I think I need but three." Permis
sion being granted, Mr. Storrs concluded his speech by saying:
"Gentlemen, give the grand old State that never knew a draft, and
never filled up a regiment with paper soldiers, — give the grand old State,
the home of Lincoln, and Douglas, and Grant, a fair chance. Put no
indignity on the honor of her sons. Then, if you can nominate the worthy
son of Ohio, John Sherman, do it fairly ; and when the hysterical gentlemen
who are afraid that he is not popular enough to carry Illinois are inquiring
their way to the polls, the grand old guard, whose representative I am,
will have planted the banner of victory on the citadels of the enemy. By
all means let us be free and absolutely untrammelled ; put no just cause
for complaint on us; have no hesitancy in a candidate who exhibits scars,
provided they are honorable scars, won in honorable warfare. Select no
man without a record; pull no skulker from under the ammunition wagon,
because he shows not upon him the signs of battle ; take the old tried hero,
— let us take him if we can get him ; and then I believe, with the old
guard behind him, who have never kept step in this world to any music
but the music of the Union, and with the friends of Blaine, and the friends
of Sherman, and the friends of all good men, a victory will be achieved,
the like of which has never been recorded in the annals of our Nations I
DISRUPTION OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY IN ILLINOIS. 68 1
politics. Citizens of one country, members of one party, let us remember
that, while we accept no indignities from our enemies, we hope and trust
and pray our friends will put none upon us. Here, in the midnight, with
the storm without, and these assembled Republicans within, we are first to
be just, first to be fair, and victory is ours as sure as the morning comes."
It was now long past midnight, and a motion to adjourn was
made, which the friends of the bolters opposed, hoping to rush
the majority report through. The motion to adjourn was lost ;
and then the question came up on the adoption of the majority
report. Mr. Cessna succeeded in obtaining a division of the
question, and a separate consideration of the contests in the
disputed districts. The majority report was adopted finally, as
to all the contested districts of Illinois, and thus eighteen of the
forty-two delegates chosen by the State convention were unseated,
and bolters substituted in their places. The Convention then
adjourned at twenty minutes past two o'clock in the morning,
Thus was inaugurated a new method of selecting delegates to
National Conventions, which was destined to bear disastrous
fruit at no distant day. The State Conventions were practically
abolished by the decision of the National Convention of 1880;
Congressional districts were substituted in their stead ; but ere
long it was found that the new plan did not stop short of leav
ing each individual delegate to do his own pleasure, quite
regardless of any pledges which he might have given. The seeds
of disruption were sown in the Republican party, and bore fruit
in 1884. The men who in 1880 stood up for the familiar
methods of the party . have remained loyal to the party ever
since, in prosperity and in adversity; the bolters of 1880 bred a
numerous progeny of mugwumps in 1884, who found a chilly
resting place in the Democratic party, despised alike by their
new allies and by the party they have deserted.
It fe needless here to tell over again the story of the "old
guard," the famous 306, who stood firm at their posts through
thirty-six ballots, voting for General Grant "first, last, and all the
time." The Convention's choice fell upon General James A-
Garfield, of Ohio. Believing, as he did, religiously in the rule
of the majority, Mr. Storrs accepted their decision, and, without a
murmur, joined with other Republicans in placing his services
in the campaign at the disposal of General Garfield.
A few days after the adjournment of the Convention, a
sympathetic friend in Peoria, Illinois, wrote to him as follows:
682 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
"I have not been an uninterested spectator, of your recent fight at the
pass of Thermopylae, where the three hundred stpod the charge of hetero
geneous hosts against them, and stood so long and so well. No one was
killed in your column. Grant will stand stronger in the hearts of his coun
trymen than ever, and so will the rest of you; while there have been
many notable deaths on the other side, — Washburne for one, for I infer he
was playing his own little game, and playing it badly. I infer this from
the fact that none of the stalwart three hundred seemed to give him any
aid or comfort. We were all prepared to welcome him as the dark horse
whenever it became apparent neither Grant nor Elaine could be nominated.
He would have been acceptable, and would have won if he had kept out
of the fight his little self, as Garfield did, — or had done as Sherman did.
He played poorly, and henceforth is 'dead as a ducat,' though he may
continue, with Elaine, Sherman, et. at., to walk about for some time to
save funeral expenses."
CHAPTER XXXIX
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1880. »
PREPARATIONS FOR THE CAMPAIGN — ORGANIZATION OF THE FRIENDS OF
GENERAL GRANT — MR. STORRS ADDRESSES THE IRISH REPUBLICANS OF
CHICAGO — WHY IRISHMEN SHOULD VOTE THE REPUBLICAN TICKET — WHY
THEY SHOULD ABANDON THE DEMOCRACY — THE COOK COUNTY CONVENTION
— THE STATE CONVENTION AT SPRINGFIELD — MASS MEETING IN CENTRAL
MUSIC HALL — THE NATIONAL CONVENTION — OPPOSITION DELEGATES — MR.
STORRS' ARGUMENT FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE UNIT RULE — HIS
GREAT SPEECH IN THE CONVENTION — DEFECTION OF MR. WASHBURNE —
THE "OLD GUARD" — MR. STORRS AT BURLINGTON, IOWA — SPEECH IN PHIL
ADELPHIA — THE DEMOCRATIC PLATFORM REVIEWED — WHAT ITS SUCCESS
WOULD MEAN — ITS FINANCIAL HERESIES — MR. STORRS ADDRESSES THE COL
ORED REPUBLICANS OF CHICAGO — AT OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA — AT DENVER,
COLORADO — MR. STORRS STUMPS THE STATE OF OHIO — GREAT SPEECH AT
CLEVELAND— AT THE COOPER INSTITUTE, NEW YORK— ARTICLE IN THE
NORTH AMERICAN REVIEW.
THE stalwart Grant county of Iowa opened the campaign
with an enthusiastic ratification meeting at Burlington on
the 1 6th of July. Mr. Storrs then struck the keynote of the
campaign in a masterly address.
As was his custom in every campaign, he set out with a telling
review and comparison of the past records of the two parties,
which need not be here repeated. He next discussed the
Democratic platform, the first plank of which was as follows:
"We pledge ourselves anew to the constitutional doctrines and traditions
of the Democratic party, as illustrated by the teaching and example of a
long line of Democratic statesmen and patriots, and embodied in the plat
form of the last national convention of the party."
This paragraph, he said, rendered it absolutely necessary to
re-discuss all those old issues which we had fondly hoped were
683
684 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
settled. He again went over the history of the State sovereignty
heresy, and concluded his observations on this first plank by
saying :
"They pledge themselves anew to the doctrine of state sovereignty ; pledge
themselves anew to their opposition to every measure of the war ; pledge
themselves anew to their opposition to the constitutional amendments ;
pledge themselves anew to this opposition to all the legislation by which
they can be enforced; pledge themselves anew to the declaration of 1868
that they regard them all as revolutionary, as usurpations, as unconstitutional
and void, and necessarily pledge themselves to erase those from the Consti
tution and statute book the first moment when they possess sufficient legis
lation and executive power combined so to do. This significant declaration
must make us pause. [Cheers.]
"Their second plank is as follows: 'Opposition to centralization, and to
that dangerous spirit of encroachment which tends to consolidate in one, and
thus to create, whatever the form of government, a real despotism.'"
He answered the Democratic objections to centralization as he
had done in previous campaigns, and he proceeded with his
analysis of this platform:
"The third plank of their platform is as follows: No sumptuary laws,
separation of church and state for the good of each, and common schools
fostered and protected.' No opposition to sumptuary laws and no legislation
which would interfere with free whisky, is entirely consistent with the
Democratic party, for all such laws would be clearly opposed to the doc
trines and traditions of that party. The division of church and state is a
doctrine stolen from the Des Moines speech of General Grant, and their
declaration that common schools should be fostered and protected in view
of the practice of the states from which the one hundred and thirty-eight
electoral votes are to be drawn, is an absurdity. After the war, when
having clothed the negro with the privileges of 'a citizen we sought to make
him capable of exercising those privileges intelligently by establishing-
schools and building school houses, that same party in the south which
to-day fosters and declares its intention of fostering schools, flogged or
assassinated the school teacher and burned the school-houses. School-houses
there for the education of the poor whites and blacks are not only not
fostered — they are not tolerated, and this declaration carries a lie upon its
face.
"Their fourth plank announces this doctrine: 'Home-rule, honest money
consisting of gold and silver and paper convertible into coin on demand,
and the strict maintainance of the public faith, state and national, and a
tariff for revenue only.'
"What does the Democratic party mean by 'home-rule?' The eviden
ces which they have furnished us of home-rule in these states from which
the one hundred and thirty-eight electoral votes are to be derived are not
encouraging. From the practical evidences they have given us, home-rule
THE "CAMPAIGN OF 1880. 685
means with them the right to fetter opinions, to stifle speech, to terrorize the
voter and bully the courts at home. It means the White-Liner and the Ku-
Klux at home ; it means the argument of the shot-gun ; it means the per
suasion of Chisholm and Dixon and hundreds of others by the gentle meth
ods of assassination ; it means the enlightment of the negro and the white
Republican voter, by midnight raids, by burning homes and indiscriminate
slaughters. This is the practice of the home-rulers in the south, and this
is the practice which this platform ratifies and endorses and the right which
it demands. Nothing, however, more impudent in politics can be found
than the declaration of this plank in the platform for honest money, let us
compare the practice of the Democratic party in the past with its present
professions.
"The Democratic platform in 1868 called for the payment of the public
debt in greenbacks, which had it been adopted, would have resulted in such
an inflation of our currency as to have rendered the resumption of specie
payments an absolute impossibility, which would have been the dishonor of
not only the public debt but of the greenback itself. They aimed a fatal
blow at the national credit for they demanded ' equal taxation of every species
of property according to its real value, including government bonds and other
public securities.' Had this policy been adopted, my fellow citizens, do you
suppose that it would have been within the range of possibility for us to have
reduced the interest upon our public debt? Would not the national honor
have been so shaken that resumption would have been an impossibility,
and honest money something in a distance so far removed that we could
never expect to live to reach it? In 1869 the public credit bill, which
pledged the nation to the payment of its debt in coin, was opposed in con
gress by the almost solid vote of the Democratic party. Clamoring to-day
for honest money, they opposed the resumption bill which makes the green
back and national bank-note honest money. Their platform in 1876 writ
ten by a shrewd capitalist who had an eye to the vote of the state of New
York and supposed that he would have the south at all events, for the
purpose of catching the capitalist vote, declared for honest money and
denounced the Republican party for hindering resumption, the entire Demo
cracy having previously opposed the scheme of resumption, but in January,
1876, but a few months after this convention met, the bill to repeal the
resumption act received 112 votes in the house of representatives, all dem
ocratic but one. In June, 1876, as a rider to the civil appropriation bill,
an amendment repealing the resumption act received solid Democratic sup
port. Does this look like honest money? The party was not converted by
its platform, for the party understood the purpose of the platform. A bill
to repeal the fixing of the time for resumption August 5th, 1876, received
in the house 176 votes, all Democratic except three, more than a year after
the declaration of the platform of 1876. In October, 1877, Mr. Ewing
reported from the committee on banking and currency a bill to repeal the
resumption act. This is the practice of the party as against its profession.
It was the the practice of the party not only in our national congress but
throughout the states. In this honest state of Iowa the platform of the
686 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORRS.
Democratic party for 1877, declared : We demand the immediate repeal of
the specie resumption act.' In 1878, still unconverted, the Democracy of
the state of Iowa in its platform declares : ' We favor the immediate repeal
of the resumption act.' This is the sentiment of the party. Its constitu
tional doctrines and traditions and its votes, wherever its votes would tell,
have been from the beginning down even to to-day against honest money
for which in its platform to-day it lyingly and hypocritically declares.
"Their fifth plank declares: 'The subordination of the military to the
civil power, and a thorough and genuine reform of the civil service.'
"This simply means that the military power shall not be used to protect
the citizen nor to put down armed and organized resistance to the enforce
ment of the laws. It means that the moonshiner shall go unpunished ; it
means that wherever an independent Democrat determines jthat he will not
pay the revenues which the government imposes upon the business which
he is pursuing, that no military power shall be employed to compel such
payment ; it means that acts of congress may be resisted in their execution
by organized bodies of armed men ; that no military power may intervene
to enforce these acts of congress nor to put down snch armed and organized
resistance to their enforcement. It means that an act of congress providing
for an honest ballot, and for a peaceable poll shall be rendered nugatory
by the surrounding of polls by armed and organized bands of ruffians, and
that the military powers of the nation shall not be invoked to protect the
citizens in the enjoyment of their privileges, in the enjoyment of which the
constitutional amendment solemnly guarantees him. [Applause.]
"It is well that the Democratic party was exceedingly brief in its demand
for a thorough and genuine reform of the civil service. It states no plan
— it states no evil that it seeks to remedy. If it is patriotic men — men
thoroughly devoted to the nation and to its preservation, thoroughly devoted
to the support of the great guarantees furnished by the constitutional
amendments that we desire — shall we find them in the Democratic party?
Does it possess more of the intelligence of this country than the Republican
party ?
"This party has organized in itself the bulk of the ignorance the vio
lence and the crime of the country. If culture and superior education
are desired in our office-holders is there even a Democrat who will claim
that better facilities are furnished for procuring these requisites from the
Democratic than from the Republican party ? Will you, with the experience
of the organization of the house of representatives before you, contemplate
what kind of a reform that will be which will result from the election
of Hancock? Not only would the triumph of the Democratic party fail
to promote any genuine reform of the civil service, but it would render
such reform utterly impossible. No one expects the civil service to be
reformed through any such curious and extraordinary channels.
"By their sixth plank the Democracy declare 'the right of a free ballot
is a right preservative of all rights, and must and shall be maintained
in every part of the United States.'
" From reading this platform one would almost come to the conclusion
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 88O. 68/
that the Democratic party had decided in its platform to state great
truths which it had always opposed and to assert great rights which it
had always denied. The election laws of congress, so-called, were
passed to secure a free and honest ballot, and to prevent fraud and
violence at the polls. At the time they were passed the Democratic
party solidly opposed them, and denounced them as unconstitutional, and
has since that time even by revolutionary schemes, steadily sought their
repeal. The courts have sustained their constitutionality of those laws and
yet their repeal is as steadily sought.
"The whole current of Democratic history gives the lie to this protesta
tion in favor of a free and honest ballot.
44 They have never advocated a registry law, the purpose and fair
operation of which where they have been in power would be to secure
a free or an honest ballot. No law for the registration of the voter and
for the protection of the purity of the polls has ever been passed that
has not encountered the opposition of the Democratic party, and when
it has been in power such laws have uniformily fallen under their
administration.
"The fraudulent vote of the city of New York for years and years is a
steady commentary upon the falsity of this protestation. In 1868, as was
subsequently demonstrated upon the trial of Tweed' and the examination of
his affairs, over twenty thousand votes were cast, or at least a fraudu
lent vote of twenty thousand in but very few wards of that city. In
several precincts there were more votes counted — double the number of
votes counted — than the entire population. This was under a Democratic
administration. They opposed every registry scheme by which these gross
and outrageous frauds might be prevented.
"But is there a free ballot in the south? Does any man of ordinary
honesty and ordinary intelligence claim such a thing? Let us take a
few examples. In 1872 the Republican vote of Alabama was 90,272, the
vote in 1878 was nothing; and yet the Democratic vote was not
increased to a larger extent than the increase of population would
justify. Is that a free ballot?
"In 1872 the Republican vote in Arkansas was 41,373; in 1878 it
was 115. The Democratic vote in the meantime had not increased, but
this Republican vote had been terrorized, bulldozed and driven from the
polls, and by threats, fraud and violence, the expression of public
opinion by the ballot was absolutely and utterly stifled ; and yet the
party guilty of this most stupendous and gigantic crime, sneakingly and
hypocritically, in its platform, protests that the right of free ballot is a
right preservative of all rights and must, they say, be maintained in all
parts of the United States.
"In 1872 the Republican vote of Mississippi was 82,175; in 1878 it
had dwindled down to 1,168. This tremendous change cannot be
accounted for by conversions. It is simply a dropping off of the vote,
not an accession of Democratic strength but a denial of the right of
suffrage. Is this a free ballot?
688 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
"In their tenth plank the Democracy say: 'We congratulate the coun
try upon the honesty and thrift of a Democratic Congress, which has
reduced the public expenditures forty millions a year, and upon the con
tinuation of prosperity at home and national honor abroad.'
"The first commentary upon that is that it is false; but this glaringly
false pretense of economy will bear examination. How has this economy
been exhibited? Is it economy? In the reduction of the army and in
cutting down the pay of our officers. The spectacle of a crowd of rebel
brigadiers in congress, sitting in judgment on the pay of Sheridan and
Sherman and union soldiers and officers, is one which the loyal men of
this country do not contemplate with any very great degree of pleasure
or satisfaction ; but we have been compelled to witness it. Our army cut
down and so crippled that it is absolutely inefficient to protect our
frontiers or indeed to protect us against mobs in our large cities through
out the entire country — is that economy? I regard it as the most wasteful
extravagance. *
"It refuses to make appropriations for the payment of judgments pro
cured in the court of claims against the United States, and proclaims
this as economy. It refuses to make appropriations for the payment of
the expense of our courts, and has left the federal courts throughout the
whole country so crippled that there has been no money to pay jury
service, and in numberless instances the marshals have been compelled
from their private funds, to pay the expenses of the administration of
justice in the federal courts. This is not economy ; this is a shameful
neglect of duty ; a shameful denial of justice to the citizen ; a shameful
and a wasteful extravagance.
"It refuses to make appropriations to finish uncompleted public build
ings, thereby vastly increasing the expense when completion must ulti
mately be made. It has cut down the service in the department of
the interior and other departments to such an extent that the patent
office and pension bureau have been almost practically closed. It has
refused to make sufficient appropriations for the revenue cutter service,
to the prejudice of the customs revenue, and has lost tens of thousands
of dollars from revenue, where it has derived one from its niggardly
appropriation for that service. It has refused to make adequate appropria
tion for the signal service : it has practically refused appropriations for the
repair and protection of the navy yards, stations, armories and arsenals,
suffering these great properties to go to wasteful and ruinous decay. It
has refused to make adequate appropriations for the increased expenses
devolved upon the mint and assay offices, rendered necessary by recent
legislation, thus tending to defeat the object of legislation. It has refused
to make adequate appropriations for the survey of the public lands ; it has
made grossly inadequate appropriations for lighthouses, beacons and fog
stations, thus imperilling the safety of our merchant marine. And, finally
by one great effort, it cut off the supply of lemonade to the members of
the house of representatives, but, as history tells us, the supply was
sought for by individual members from the senate department.
THE CAMPAIGN OF l88O. 689
"At the close of this remarkable plank which I have just read to
you, the country is congratulated by the Democratic party upon the
continuation of prosperity at home and national honor abroad. But how
in the' light of history has this prosperity at home been secured, and
this honor abroad been maintained? But for the large reduction of
public expenditures, resulting from resumption of specie payments and
strengthening of the public credit, and reduction of the rate of interest
on the public debt, the thoroughness, efficiency and honesty with which
all our custom duties and internal revenues have been collected and
paid over, the country is indebted to a Republican administration.
[Applause.] "
Appeals of the most urgent kind were awaiting him when he
got home to Chicago. The mail was superseded, and the tele
graph put in active requisition. The chairmen of the Ohio and
Indiana State committees were both competing for his services,
so that it was physically impossible for him to accommodate
both. He referred the dilemma to General Garfield, who wrote
him as follows:
" MENTOR, OHIO, October 2, 1880.
" MY DEAR STORRS,
"Yours of yesterday received, and since that your telegram that you will
be in Toledo on Monday.
"I know how crowded you are, with work, and how great a sacrifice it
is to leave your law office so long, but these are days of destiny, and we
must have all the help you can give us.
"If you find it possible to call on me while in Ohio, I hope you will not
fail to do so. "Very truly yours,
"J. A. GARFIELD."
On the 4th of October, Mr. Storrs made his first appeal in
the Ohio campaign at Toledo. Secretary Carl Schurz had been
assigned to the same city by the State Committee, and the two
gentlemen had a pleasant interview, being for some hours guests
of the same hotel. Mr. Schurz was averse to speaking on the
same platform with Mr. Storrs, regarding it as a waste of ammu
nition ; and at his suggestion a meeting of the German popula
tion of Toledo was hastily got together by the local committee,
which Mr. Schurz addressed in his native tongue. The Toledo
Blade had the following editorial comment on the occasion:
"The gatherings last night were the most significant things in Toledo's
political history since the stirring days of 1861. That at the Soenger
Halle was the best representation of the city's intelligence, education, and
character that has been gathered together at least in this decade. To see
two hundred and fifty of our most respected citizens of advanced age, the
44
690 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
men whose wisdom and life long labors have brought Toledo forward to
where she is — men of the highest standing in the community, and
respected above all others for what they are and have done— to see
these arrayed in ranks to attest their deep interest in the momentous
questions of the occasion, and to see these fathers in Israel flanked and
supported by a grand battalion of the men whose valor was conspicuous
on every battle-field of the late war, was an imposing sight that the
thousands who packed the immense hall in front of them never before
witnessed, and we trust will never again, for we hope that never again
will there be a public danger calling for such a significant demonstration.
"The orator of the evening was worthy of his magnificent audience.
Mr. Emery A. Storrs has no superior in the art of reaching the popu
lar heart, of presenting great truths in a way that will at once charm
and convince his hearers. He is a magician in the use of the English
language to convey grand thoughts and pregnant facts. No wavering
man in that vast assemblage left the hall unconvinced that the salvation
of the country lay in Republican success."
After the meeting, a congratulatory telegram was sent to Mrs.
Storrs by Petroleum V. Nasby, editor of the Blade, in the fol
lowing words:
"Storrs meeting the largest ever held here. Speech a most brilliant one.
Intense enthusiasm. "D. R. LOCKE, Editor Blade"
The following night he addressed a large meeting in Sandusky,
and was listened to by many who had been addressed in the
fair grounds the same afternoon by Mr. Elaine. Next day he
addressed an open air gathering at Norwalk, and on the 7th at
Elyria, where there was an immense demonstration, the town
being crowded from morning till night by people from the sur
rounding country, and the air rent all day long by their cheer
ing and by the music of brass bands. During his progress in
Ohio he had received daily telegrams from the chairman of the
State Committee, asking him to speak at various places outside
of his proposed limit as to time, and these were reinforced by
communications from General Garfield and Governor Foster. ]n
one telegram from Mentor, General Garfield said — "We greatly
rely upon you." Another, dated October 7th, was as follows:
"Our people are crazy over you. So far as you can, consistently with
other engagements, keep speaking. "J. A. GARFIELD."
Another, of the same date, said:
" I hope you will speak at Elyria, and then come here by evening train.
"J. A. GARFIELD."
While he was being urged in this way to extend his tour in
THE CAMPAIGN OF l88O. 69!
Ohio, Mr. New was just as importunate for him to go to Indi
ana. The following telegram explains the result :
" Kennard House. Come and see me. Have wired New, as you
request, that your health and voice prevent your speaking in Indiana.
"J. A. GARFIELD."
In addition to these, he received at Cleveland the following
despatch from General Arthur :
"Can you not speak for us in the Cooper Union, Wednesday evening,
the 1 3th? We have been holding great mass meetings every Wednesday
evening. Conkling, Evarts, and Pierrepont have already spoken, and now
we want you. "C. A. ARTHUR."
The Cleveland Herald, in its report of the Elyria meeting,
said, — "Nothing but a full report can do justice to 'Mr. Storrs'
speech. Though we have had two fine orators here already this
year, his was decidedly the speech of the campaign. Mr. Storrs
was serenaded at the Beebe house in the evening by the band
and a large concourse of citizens. He appeared on the balcony,
and delivered an address of about twenty minutes' length upon
the general prosperity, reconciliation, and Order No. 40. Though
brief, the address was eloquent and telling, and was loudly
cheered at its close."
He took a night train to Cleveland, where he met General
Garfield, and spent the next day, which was Saturday, quietly
with General Garfield in the seclusion of Mentor. In the even
ing he addressed a large meeting in the Cleveland opera house.
The Cleveland Leader announced that the Republicans of that
city were to have an opportunity of listening to "the Chrysostom
of Chicago." The whole lower floor of the house was reserved
for ladies accompanied by gentlemen. "This arrangement," said
the Leader, "made by the county committee, is a graceful recog
nition of the fact tersely stated by one of our best women con
tributors, that 'it is not necessary to be a man to be a strong
partisan this fall.'"
After an eloquent tribute to the women of America, Mr. Storrs
said:
" We stand in the midst of an unrivaled prosperity, an honorable and a
deserved prosperity. Wise legislation, honest fulfillment of National engage
ments, even through years of suffering self-denial; good Government, with
a fruitful soil faithfully tilled ; honest business, patiently and steadily pursued ;
earnest labor, adequately rewarded, have brought us this great prosperity.
692 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
The Republican party has given us this legislation ; has performed these
National engagements; has governed fairly; has protected and encouraged
labor, and has so ordered our affairs that to-day we have an honest day's
wages for an honest day's work, paid in honest money. Shall we change
all this?
"In 1880, throughout all the boundaries of the Republic there is not a
slave ; in 1860 there were 4,000,000 of slaves, who were not citizens, who
were denied the rights of common humanity, who were chattels merely. In
1860, the Democratic party being in power and the country being disgraced by
the presence in it of 4,000,000 of slaves, that party was opposed to a change ;
in 1880, when slavery has been extirpated from the soil of the Republic,
the same party demands a change. In 1860 all our vast Western Territories
were threatened with slavery, and so far as the policy of the party, aided
by a convenient Supreme Court, could effect that end, slavery was declared
to be national and freedom sectional. In 1880 all these imperiled territories
are free States, populous, powerful and prosperous. In 1860 the Democratic
party was opposed to a change ; in 1880 they demand a change.
"In 1860, for a trivial loan of a very few millions, the bonds of the
United States Government would fetch but eighty-eight cents in the market,
those bonds drawing six per cent, interest; in 1880 thousands of millions of
dollars of Government bonds, drawing four per cent, interest, command in
every money market of the world a premium of from eight to ten cents on
the dollar. In 1860 the Democratic party was opposed to a change; in
1880 it demands a change. In 1860 we were afflicted with an unstable,
fluctuating vicious currency, the value of which changed every time its
holder crossed a county line. The profits of the merchant and the producer
were swallowed up in exchanges; in 1880 we have as stable, fixed and
uniform a currency as any government ever possessed ; the national bank
note issued in the extremest corner of Maine possesses the same value in
the remotest corner of Texas, and is good everywhere. . . . Addressing so
many representatives of the business interests of this great and thriving city,
I simply put the question to them whether they, on the whole, demand a
change, and whether the change which they demand is such an one as will
result in the reversal of the policy and system of government which has
produced these astounding and these magnificent results?
"No good citizen of Cleveland, anxious for its growth and for the growth
and prosperity of the country, anxious to promote the success and prosper
ity of its business interests, can ally himself with the Democratic party with
out grossly stultifying himself. He can do it upon no other hypothesis thai?
that the Democratic party, if it gains power, will not carry out the doc
trines which it announces. I submit that it is too much to expect of the
average citizen that he will vote the ticket of a political party upon the'
assumption that if it succeeds it will reverse its own policy, defeat its owri
measures, repudiate its own history and do precisely the things it declares
it will not do, and that it will fail to do precisely the things which it sol
emnly and positively assures us that it will do. I do not wish to talk
extravagantly, but is it not too large a draught upon the credulity of the
THE CAMPAIGN OF l88o. 693
average citizen to ask him to assist in the election of the Democratic ticket
on the assumption that it will thoroughly carry out Republican doctrine?
Is it not placing General Hancock in a most disagreeable dilemma to call
upon him after his election to belie the platform and betray the express
policy of the party which nominated and elected him? We are to-night to
pray, 'Lead us not into temptation.' I would save General Hancock from
that great temptation.. Without asking anything extravagant in the way of
credence of the Republican party, am I not sufficiently reasonable when I
insist that the Republican party is more likely to carry out Republican doer
trine than any other party ? It is familiar with its own doctrine, has had
the handling of it for many years, thoroughly understands it, is accustomed
to no other, and particularly will not a Republican President, like Garfield,
fall into the rut of suggesting and carrying out measures which he has
always been in favor of, much more readily than a President would who
had always been opposed to them ?
" Is there any gentleman in this audience who can indicate to me the
great interest of any kind, character or description which the Demo
cratic party represents? It does not represent the manufacturing interest
of the country. To claim that it does would be merely ignorant impu
dence. It does not represent the banking interests of the country ; it
demands their destruction. To claim otherwise would be mere effrontery.
It does not represent nor can it be regarded as a special champion of
the National credit, for it has steadily sought to depreciate and destroy
it. It has sought the repudiation of the National debt and the dishonor
of the National name by the taxation of Government bonds. It does
not represent the educational interests of the country. I think no Demo
crat could retire to his room alone by himself and keep a straight
face and insist that the party to which he belonged did represent the
educational interests of this country. It is not the friend of free schools,
North or South. The solid Democratic party of the South burns the
school-house and bullies, bludgeons or shoots the school-master. Its
rank and file cannot be regarded as the highest rtype of American
intelligence. I would say in this connection nothing unkind, and any
gentleman who would say that the rank and file of the Democratic
party represent the highest education and culture of the country would, I
think, be showing an ignorance so broad and comprehensive that that
very assertion would, in its absurdity, refute his statement. I venture to
suggest that it does not represent the best and highest moral instincts
of the country. I think I need not enlarge upon this. Take the party
as it stands, it does not exclusively fill our churches nor our Sunday-
Schools. It has not an overwhelming majority represented in our Chris
tian associations nor in our religious charities. In short it does not, as
a party, represent those feelings; and whenever an excellent Democrat
drifts into those moral and Christian currents, his standing in his party
is sure to be impaired. What does it represent? Merely opposition to
every measure of National growth and freedom of which we have had
knowledge or experience since 1856."
694 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
But the most telling feature of the Cleveland speech was his
exposure of General Hancock's ignorance on the tariff question.
He said:
"I have said that the party has always opposed protection. In its
platform to-day it declares that it is in favor of a tariff for revenue
only, and a tariff for revenue only means the encouragement to its
largest measure and its fullest extent of the importation of the foreign
article. How does General Hancock stand upon the platform ? This
declaration against a protective tariff is No. 4 in the Democratic plat
form, and Hancock says, 'The doctrines enumerated are those I have
always cherished, and which I will endeavor to maintain in the future.'
Yesterday, however, finding an indignant public sentiment running
against his party, finding the laboring interests aroused everywhere, find
ing the manufacturers awake, he was subjected by a manufacturer from
New Jersey to an interview, which was published in all the newspapers,
and which is the most remarkable document, I think, ever vouchsafed
to man. As a piece of raw, crude humor, it discounts anything that
ever Mark Twain undertook. [Laughter.] Now let me read you what
that 'superb statesman and soldier' said, with notes historical and
explanatory, after the manner of Plutarch. The interviewer begins the
scene with and after the following manner, that is to say : ' There is
one thing General, I desire to speak about: The tariff question is creating
a good deal of talk in Paterson, particularly among manufacturers and the
working classes. Now, how is that going to work?' And the superb
soldier, standing erect, with Order No. 40 in one hand and a batch of
cipher dispatches in the other, says: 'That question, the tariff question,
cannot affect the manufacturing interests of the country in the least.'
[Laughter.]
"There you have it. That is wisdom coming right down in boulders, I
don't want to lose that. I want to read that again. 'The tariff question,
cannot affect the manufacturing interests of the country in the least.'
If it cannot, what*can? The doctrine of foreordination, of justificatio'n by
faith, of election, works, immersion, sprinkling? Anything would affect, I
suppose, the manufacturing interests, but the tariff question cannot.
[Laughter.] 'My election would make no difference either way, one way
or the other.' Why, how does he know? 'There has to be a certain
amount, millions of dollars, raised by a tariff that can be got in no other
way.' We know that, General, and your party proposes to get it all
that way, and wants a tariff for revenue only, and wants to encourage
the importations ; for, my dear General, if you do not have any impor
tations you do not have any revenue out of a tariff, and the more you
have of importations the less you have of protection and the more you
have of competition. But he goes on, 'The election of a Democratic
President or the election of a Republican President cannot interfere with
or influence that in the least.' Let us see, General ; suppose that the
experiment which the Democratic party inaugurated last winter, in defeat-
THE CAMPAIGN OF *l88o. 695
ing which I took a hand as an outsider, had been carried successfully
into operation. Suppose that the duty on iron of all kinds, steel rails,
paper, cotton, and of everything else, had been stricken down. The
Democratic party undertook to do it. The Solid South is in favor of it.
Suppose, my good friend Townsend, they had succeeded. Would not the
election of a man who would have vetoed legislation of that character
have made a little difference? If Garfield had been President the legislation
would have been vetoed, and the country saved from that calamity. If
the 'superb soldier' had been President the bill would have been signed,
and the interests extending to $30,000,000 in the city of Cleveland wrecked
in a day. That is the difference. [Applause.] It is the difference between
a projected measure becoming a law and not becoming a law, and that
is a very great difference, I assure you. Observe he does not say that
he would veto free trade legislation. He makes no promise of the kind.
He exhibits merely a broad and comprehensive ignorance of the whole
subject. [Laughter.] It is windy declamation — it is discreditable to him
as a citizen in the very last degree.
"But I go further, and it gets worse as you proceed. 'The Paterson
people need have no anxiety whatever that I will ever favor anything that
interferes with the manufacturing or industrial interests of the country.
They will have just as much protection under Democratic administration as
under Republican administration/ Was ever the history of this country so
absurdly belied! What is Groesbeck of Cincinnati? Who is Blackburn
that has been talking in this State, denouncing the whole system? What is
the whole Solid South? Who is Fernando WTood, the chairman of the
committee on Ways and Means? A rabid free-trader. And yet this man,
in his dense, chunky ignorance of the whole subject, declares that the
party hating the system of protection will defend that system just as
zealously as the party which has always favored it!
"I want to ask you another question: Do you ever remember the
instance of a Democratic administration in the whole history of this country,
where they had all branches of the Government, legislative and executive,
that ever they found a protective tariff they did not destroy? You cannot
point to an instance. Their whole scheme last winter was to its destruction.
Hancock don't know it! He has not found it out! He had better have
been hoarse as he was when the shipbuilders called on him. He displays
the most colossal ignorance of the whole subject by the paragraph I will
now read. 'The tariff question,' what? You cannot guess. 'The tariff
question,' Mr. President, General Hancock says, 'is a local question.' Now,
if there is anything in all our politics that is not local, that is the one thing.
A tariff affects, for good or ill, not only every conceivable interest on this
continent, but all over the world. It is one of those few questions with
which a school district and a State has not anything under God's heavens
to do.
" But he gets worse as he proceeds. ' The same question was once brought up
in my native State of Pennsylvania.' [Great laughter.] That same question,
he says, that question of the tariff, which is a local question was once brought
696 LIFE oV EMERY A. STORKS.
up in Pennsylvania [laughter]; a State in which they have not talked about
anything else under God's heaven for the last twenty -five years. Why,
he is laboring under the impression that they were fixing up a tariff
system at Harrisburg, and adjusting duties and a scheme of protection
by the Pennsylvania State Legislature. He finishes up in this manner;
•It is a matter that the General Government,' hold on, 'seldom cares to
interfere with.' [Laughter.] Who else would interfere with it? 'It is a
matter that th£ General Government seldom cares to interfere with.'
States generally take hold of it. But occasionally the General Gov
ernment puts its hand on it. [Laughter.] 'And nothing is likely
ever to be done that will interfere with the industry of the country.'
Now that I suppose, is an authentic report of that interview. I commend
it to General Hancock's attention that instead of cross-examining General
Grant about his interview (for he will find that the witness will bother
him on cross-examination) [applause] he had better set himself industri
ously at work contradicting that, and get some small book on the sub
ject of the tariff, or else be afflicted with a hoarseness until the cam
paign closes.
"Now, my fellow citizens, I have seen the workings, in a narrow
portion of the country, of the doctrines of free trade. I visited the
State of California two or three weeks ago. I am familiar with the
logic of free tradfe ; I used to believe in it. There is no literature in
the world so captivating to a young man as that of free trade, but a
little more reading and a little more thinking on my own account and
a good deal more of experience, demonstrated to me that it would not
work. I remember that the millennium of free trade doctrine is 'a
cheap product,' and when a free trader argues with you and gets so
far as to demonstrate that his policy will result in a cheap product, he
thinks the debate is closed. The fact is, it is only just begun. What
this government was organized for was not cheap cotton, but was:
intelligent, industrious, well-to-do citizens. I am probably heterodox, but
I think a great deal more of a prosperous laboring man than I do of
a cheap boot, and the policy of protection in the end gives us both,
and everybody is benefited by it.
"The city of San Francisco ought to be the very Elysium of free trade.
Boots are cheap; the Chinaman makes them. Underwear is cheap; the
Chinaman makes it. Ready made clothing is cheap; the Chinaman makes
it. Cigars are cheap; the Chinaman makes them. Tinware is very cheap;
the Chinaman makes them. Is San Francisco prosperous? Is California
prosperous? California is the only State in all this Union that shows a
decrease of population and prosperity in the last two years. San Francisco
is the only great city in this Union that has reduced its capital, its business
and population since 1876. What is the trouble? You have a cheap pro
duct. It is the result of a degraded and pauperized labor. The Chinaman
under the cast-iron habits of 3,000 years of experience in famine and star
vation can work and live in a fashion that the white laborer cannot do,
and I hope to God he may never be called upon to do. [Applause.] He
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 88O. 697
can live on rats and the white laborer cannot. He pays nothing for educa
tion and the white laborer does. The white laborer has a home, and the
Chinaman has none. With all these advantages in his favor, if a white
man competes with him he must accept the conditions of the competition.
He must live and breathe and move and have his being as his competitor
lives and moves and has his being.
"Now let us go just one step farther. A general free trade, a tariff
for revenue only, throws down every barrier agrinst competition with the
pauper labor of the old world, and if this competition with 15,000 or
20,000 paupers out of the 100,000,000 of our country will destroy one
city and ruin a State, I ask you what will be the result when the
experiment is extended over the whole country, the barriers against that
competition are thrown down, and that competition is waged, not in a
corner, but everywhere ; not against a fraction of one pauper nationality,
but against all the paupers of all the globe everywhere? My fellow
citizens, it is not difficult to answer the question. It was but a few
years ago that Mr. Gladstone was at the head of the English Government.
"He is a great free trader ; he made a free trade treaty with France : silks
from France were introduced into England duty free. Within a month the
factories engaged in the manufacture of silk in two great cities of Great
Britain— Coventry and Macclesfield — were closed, and they remained
closed for an entire year. Their character was changed and they turned
into manufacturers for cotton. The industry destroyed, their skilled
laborers were driven to this -country, and here on this continent the skilled
laborers ,of Great Britain engaged in the manufacture of silk, driven from
their own shores by the policy of free trade, protected here, have built up
such an industry as will in five years drive the silk article out of competi
tion in every market of the world. [Applause.] I don't care how much you
theorize, there are these great facts, and what I have said is true of every
conceivable form of industry. It is true of every manufacturing industry,
and the people of this country are asked to surrender these vast interests
into the hands of a party which threatens and is determined to destroy the
policy out of which they have grown and by which they have been created."
In conclusion Mr. Storrs referred to the Democratic predic
tions in 1868, when it was stated that the pillars of the Govern
ment were rocking on their base. Said he:
"Have you seen any trouble with the pillars of the Government? The
trouble was not with the pillars of the Government ; they did not rock ;
the trouble was with the gentlemen who were looking at the pillars of the
Government. [Laughter and applause.] They were like the gentleman
who had been attending a lecture on astronomy. Going home loaded with
a great deal of Democratic logic [Laughter], with a step weary and
uncertain, with the earth revolving a great many times upon its axis, he
affectionately clasped a lamp post and said, 'Old Galileo was right, about
it; the world does move.' [Laughter.] 'And should it, the Republican
party, succeeded in November next and inaugurate the President, we
698 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
will meet as a subdued and conquered people amid the ruins of liberty
and the scattered fragments of the Constitution.' I have been from the
tempest-tossed waters of the Atlantic to the peaceful seas of the Pacific,
over the mountains, along great rivers, across magnificent plain and
prairie, through deserts, down into caves, and I have not seen a single
ruin of liberty nor discovered a solitary fragment of the Constitution.
[Laughter and applause.] We do not meet as a subdued and a con
quered people. General Grant was our nominee for President, and he was
elected. [Great applause.] He being the candidate, there was a strong
probability that he would be inaugurated if elected. [Applause.]
"Forthwith we banded this great continent with ribs of iron and steel.
Forthwith this Republican party carried the gold ore across those seas
back to the lands of old Egypt, and back to the shadow of the pyra
mids, back to old Damascus, and bought all the history and tradition,
spices and gums, incense and myrrh, and landed them in this fruitful
west, where we received them with one hand and distributed them all over
the habitable globe with the other. This great Republican party inter-
ferred with no pillars of the Government. It found in that edifice the
decaying timbers of human chattelhood. Bless God! it removed them,
and replaced them with the everlasting granite of universal freedom.
[Applause.] It broadened out that splendid edifice, its base covered the
whole continent, each ocean washed its base. It reared that splendid
dome, decked with stars, clean above the clouds, where, thank God! it
shines and shines to-day, bathed in the glorious sunshine of everlasting
fame. [Applause.] It has taken out the old, foul records of the olden
time, the old pestilential heresies, State Rights, secession, the thumb
screw, the faggot, the chain, the whip, all these ; the manacled slave>
the padlock for the lips, the throttled thought, all these ; the deep,
damning and almost ineffaceable shame of National dishonor, all these
it has effaced from its walls, and written there, shining and resplendent,
living forever, the grandest record of achievements that the history of
this world has ever inscribed."
He closed by reviewing the platform of the Democratic party,
and holding up its sophistics, one by one, under the electric
light of his pitiless logic, to the scorn and ridicule of his
auditors.
Having satisfactorily finished his Ohio tour, he paid a hur
ried visit to his home and office in Chicago, and immediately
started off again to fill appointments in New York and the
Eastern States. On the I4th of October, he spoke at Boston,
and the next night at Newburyport, Mass. The Boston Herald
said of the latter:
•' It was the ablest, cleanest cut, and most impressive campaign speech
that has been heard in Newburyport for years, many old residents say-
THE CAMPAIGN OF l88O. 699
ing they have heard nothing like it here since the days when Robert
Rantoul was in his glory. In the audience were large numbers of
working men, and to them Mr. Storrs directed a searching appeal in
behalf of a protective tariff. The gallery was packed with ladies. This
evening's speech was Mr. Storrs' only one in Massachusetts, except
that at Boston last evening."
The Massachusetts State Committee gave a complimentary
lunch to General Grant at Boston, on the i6th, and Mr. Storrs
was one of the invited guests. The Boston Gazette said :
"The banquet to Grant was one of those occasions on which our city
always appears at her best. The attendance was made up of the represen
tative men of Boston. The speech-making was eloquent and interesting.
The opening speech -of Governor Rice was exquisitely appropriate. It had
just the desired spice of humor, and in eloquence and finish fully met the
expectations of those who know what the ex-Governor is on such occasions.
Governor Long was also highly felicitous in what he said. Judge Hoar's
address was admired by everybody. General Grant himself thoroughly
enjoyed his visit with us, though he preserved his well-known impassive
manner much of the time, and was modest and unobtrusive in his demeanor
always. The political meetings of Thursday evening are likely long to be
remembered. The news from the West brought inspiration to the hearts of
the Republicans. They came out in thousands to rejoice, and there was an
enthusiasm exhibited such as has not been before evoked in the cam
paign. The feature of the meetings was the speech of Mr. Emery A.
Storrs, of Chicago. It was the most brilliant piece of campaign oratory
that has been heard for years in Boston — ardent, aggressive, and slashing
into the Democratic lines with a vigor that reminds one of 'a dashing cav
alry charge on the field of battle."
In compliance with General Arthur's invitation, he addressed
a mass meeting at the Cooper Union, in the city of New York,
on the 2Oth of October. The New York Times said that his
speech on that occasion "gave the Republicans of New York a
taste of a style of oratory to which they are not very much
accustomed, and which has many other attractions than that of
novelty. It was direct, pungent, witty, and forcible. Mr. Storrs
kept the attention of his immense audience from the first to the
last, and was frequently and heartily applauded. If any Demo
crat imagines," said the Times, "that the laughter which he so
frequently elicited was produced by tickling mere partisan preju
dices, he will be undeceived if he undertakes to candidly explain
away the points of Mr. Storrs' witticisms. The appearance of
General Grant at the meeting, and the greeting which he received,
formed a striking incident in the evening's proceedings."
7OO LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
Mr.. Storrs then followed with a scathing review of the Demo
cratic candidates, especially of General Hancock's career at New-
Orleans. This speech was printed in pamphlet form and circu
lated as a campaign document, and its publication brought to
Mr. Storrs a host of letters of congratulation.
But specially grateful to Mr. Storrs was the receipt of a let
ter from a patriotic American resident in Paris, who wrote:
" I must say it is many a long year since my eyes have fallen upon any
thing so comprehensive, so searching, and so forcible, as that production,
in exposing the fallacies, the demerits, and iniquities of the Democratic
party. I think this wonderful effort, which I suppose is but the beginning
of your labors in the campaign upon which the people have just entered,
merits for you the gratitude of all our patriotic citizens. By free circulation
of the copy I have in hand, I am securing for the speech the most exten
sive reading of it among Americans in my power. I hope it will be made
a campaign document, and find a place in all our Republican journals.
During a recent visit in England I heard frequently from holders of Con
federate bonds that they had assurances from the Southern States that
could the Democracy but succeed at the next Presidential election, the
debt of the Confederacy would at once be assumed by the government of
the United States. God grant that no such calamity may befall our
beloved country."
From Kansas, Missouri, Wisconsin, Iowa, Minnesota, Michigan,
Vermont, New York, Nebraska, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and
Massachusetts, came urgent letters inviting him to speak in those
States. His professional business required him to go to Califor
nia in September, but he made a trip East before going there,
and spoke in Philadelphia, New Brunswick, N. J., and in Ver
mont during the month of August.
On the 3Oth of July he wrote to General Garfield saying:
" I have to-day written Mr. Nash that he might advertise me in Ohio
from and including September 28th to October election, and possibly that
I would be able to give him a few days earlier in September. . . The
very best of feeling prevails here, and Logan is full of his old-time
spirit. In fact, everything is reconciled."
He spoke at New Brunswick, N. J., on the 26th of August,
and went over much the same ground as in his Burlington
speech.
On the 3Oth of August, the campaign in Pennsylvania was
opened with a mass meeting in Horticultural Hall, Philadelphia,
presided over by Hon. William D. Kelley.
He spoke at Pittsburg on his way home on the 2nd of Sep-
THE CAMPAIGN OF l88O. /Ol
•
tembcr. On his arrival in Chicago he found an invitation awaiting
him from the Union League of St. Louis, to address a meeting
in that city on the evening of the meeting of the Republican
State Convention of Missouri. He also received telegrams from
Governor Routt of Colorado asking him to address the people of
Denver, and letters from the State Committees of Nebraska and
California, asking him to speak at Omaha and San Francisco.
His professional business in California now required his immediate
attention, aud enabled him to comply with the three latter invi
tations, but obliged him to decline that from St. Louis, rather
against his personal inclination.
Before leaving for San Francisco, he addressed a meeting of the
colored Republicans of Chicago, impressing upon them their duty
to themselves and the party that freed them.
On his arrival in San Francisco, he was promptly interviewed
by the reporters for the daily press. Mr. Storrs' comparison of
the two Presidential candidates is so pithy and concise that we
make room for it:
"If you ask me to compare them, it can't be done. They are so
totally unlike in point of qualification that comparisons are impossible.
You might as well compare a banker with an opera singer. One is a
statesman, the other is not. One has political experience, the other has
none. One is largely versed in civil administration, the other not at all.
The one is a student of political history, the other knows nothing of it,
except a familiarity with a few windy platitudes concerning the division
of the power of the General Government. The one is educated to
broad and comprehensive national sympathies, the other has always
moved in the narrow orbit of mere military routine. One is from choice
a member of, and, by selection, the head of a great patriotic party,
which has saved the country and made it a nation, which has main
tained its credit and given a universal prosperity; the other is a selected
head of a party, which he fought to defeat when it asserted precisely
the same doctrines which it maintains to-day, One votes as he shot, the
other votes for the men he shot at. One is a modest and conscientious
citizen, the other, a vain and easily flattered soldier. One is Garfield,
and the other is Hancock."
He spoke in the Grand Opera House on the 1 5th of Septem
ber, and the Chronicle, in presenting next day a full report of
the speech, said:
"It is risking nothing to say that the great audience which crammed
the Grand Opera House last night from pit to gallery, to hear the famous
orator from Illinois, Hon. Emery A. Storrs, has not been surpassed in
7O2 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
San Francisco in point of numbers, intelligence and enthusiasm. Long
before half-past seven o'clock, half an hour before the time announced
for the opening of the meeting, hundreds reluctantly turned from the
doors, unable to squeeze their way into the immense edifice. There were
ladies willing to brave the discomforts of standing if they could but get
within the theater, men so anxious to hear Mr. Storrs that they stood in
the aisles and passage ways packed like sardines in boxes, able to hear
the fine voice of the speaker but unable to catch a glimpse of him. The
enthusiasm, as might be expected, was unparalleled. Every telling point
made by the speaker — and his speech fairly bristled with them — was
applauded to the echo."
Mr. Storrs began by saying:
"Leaving that wonderful city of mine, enthroned on the edges of the
great inland seas, coming away across 2,000 miles of plain and mount
ain to this gem on the Pacific coast, this jewel which rests upon the
edge of that wonderful ocean, I find they are both patriotic cities, both
born of patriotism. Will you allow me to carry back to my fellow
citizens when I return home the message from San Francisco to Chicago
that this wonderful city is true to her birth which made her a free
state, and is true to that great party which made us a nation. I come
from the Atlantic to the Pacific and one flag covers us ; wherever I am
I am a citizen of the United States ; and when I think of all these
splendid achievements and of our party, we did it, we did it [applause],
and the poorest of us, however little we may have of other worldly
possessions, these splendid achievements are our patrimony, and with
these we are rich indeed. [Renewed applause.] This great party, the
pride of humanity everywhere, confronts to-day the Democratic party, a
party that asks that the past be buried, and I do not wonder at it ; a
party that insists that no previous record shall be examined — I am not
surprised at it; a party that wishes to look to the future only — I am
not astonished at it, for if the record of the party to which I belong
and you belong were leprous with guilt as theirs is, and were stained
all over with crime as theirs is ; if the political history of our party-
were as theirs is, not merely criminal but crime itself, I would ask, as
they ask, that the past be forgotten. [Great applause.] Are these dead
issues? They clairn so; I think not. The great effort of the Democratic
party of to-day is to unload its history, to run away from its reputation
and its character. [Laughter.] It is a hard thing to do. [Renewed
laughter.] They discover that character is always in issue. No man
asks for employment without he puts his character in issue. You don't
employ men on their platforms nor on their promises. The banker would
not employ the pilfering clerk of last month even of his platform of
next month embodied the Ten Commandments and Christ's Sermon on
the Mount.
"You perhaps by this time have discovered that I am not in favor of a
change, except in the better and qualified sense. I am in favor of all
THE CAMPAIGN OF I S8O. /O3
changes that look to improvement. I would be in favor of a change from
hell to purgatory, but not from earth to purgatory.'"
He then reviewed their platform of 1880, making a strong point, —
as he had done at Burlington and at Philadelphia, after his dissection
of each plank in that platform, and of the action of the party in rela
tion to it, — of their declaration that the party ' pledged themselves
anew' to their old political heresies.
"You can't name a Democratic state in the Union where, if there was
really anything to protect the integrity of the ballot box they have not
repealed it. There is not a line in the statute looking to the security of
the ballot box against fraud and a fair, free and full ballot that that party
has not opposed. There is not a single measure looking to the return of
an honest dollar for an honest day's work that that party has not opposed
since 1860. We have steadily beaten this party since 1860. Have we
made any mistake in beating it? Where would' we have been if they had
beaten us in 1860? Free labor driven from one-half of the nation, the ter
ritories dedicated to servile labor and free labor driven from them, credit
prostrated, public faith dishonored, secession the accepted doctrine of the
nation. That is where we would have been had they succeeded in 1860.
Where would we have been in 1864, if they had had their way, when
they were bawling for peace, asking that hostilities cease at once ? Our
flag brought back in disgrace, our conquering heroes called home with
the ineffaceable ignominy of defeat for which they were not responsible.
Where would we have landed had they beaten us in 1868? Our national
debt paid in greenbacks, a limitless inflation of the currency, our gov
ernment bonds taxed, our reputation and our credit destroyed, the recon
struction measures swept from the statute book, the constitutional amend
ments falling with them, chaos and confusion come again and the splen
did victories of our soldiers in the field basely, meanly and abjectly sur
rendered by us after the toils and terrors of battles that had won them."
He also spoke at Oakland, a few days after his San Francisco
speech, and on his way home he stopped at Denver, in fulfil
ment of his promise to address the Republicans of that city.
He spoke there on the 23d of September, and Governor Routt
of Colorado sent the following telegram to Mrs. Storrs:
" Mr. Storrs addressed the largest and most intelligent assem
blage of Republicans' ever gathered together west of the Missis
sippi to-night, at Republican headquarters. He was escorted
from his hotel by five hundred boys in blue. He is now
receiving a serenade, and is being called on and congratulated
by a large number of the prominent citizens of the city and State-
He has done our cause great good
"JOHN L. ROUTT, Chairman."
704 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORRS.
The hearty reception he met with at Denver was always a
pleasant recollection to Mr. Storrs. An elegant and valuable
souvenir of the occasion was shortly afterwards forwarded to
Mrs. Storrs, in the shape of a beautiful necklace and earrings
made of smoky topaz, set in the native gold of the State, with
a handsome locket of native gold, on the case of which was
inscribed, — " Presented to Mrs. Emery A. Storrs, as a slight tes
timonial of their admiration of her husband, by his Colorado
friends."
The testimonial was honorable both to the givers and to the
recipient, — as a token of their magnificent liberality on the one
hand, and of the deep impression made upon their minds, on
the other hand, by the eloquent utterances of Mr. Storrs.
CHAPTER XL.
THREE CELEBRATED MURDER TRIALS.
THE COCHRANE CASE — THE WISCONSIN LAW AS TO THE PLEA OF INSANITY —
THE RANSOM CASE — THE ILLINOIS LAW OF JUSTIFIABLE HOMICIDE, AND
THE DOCTRINE OF SELF-DEFENCE — THE DUNN CASE — PATENT INSTRUC
TIONS.
THE year iSSi was a busy one for Mr. Storrs in a line of
cases which had won for him a special celebrity, but
which he always entered into with the greatest reluctance. He
disliked criminal practice, and had set his heart upon building
up a reputation in the higher courts of record : but naturally
the fame of his successes in great criminal trials, reported
at length in the newspapers, spread farther among the mass
of the people than that of his no less brilliant career at
the common law and chancery bar. The campaign which
resulted in the election of James A. Garfield as President of
the United States was hardly over when Mr. Storrs was con
sulted for the defence in a murder case which was agitating the
State of Wisconsin, and which has taken rank among the
causes celebres of the United States. It was remarkable not only
on account of its sensational details, but also on account of the
novel legal questions put in issue. It was a story of domestic
ruin, culminating in the shooting of the seducer by the wronged
husband. Mr. Storrs was induced to take up the defence, not
for the sake of the fee, for a large arrear of that remained
unpaid at the time of his death, but chiefly because the injury
the defendant had sustained enlisted Mr. Storrs' sympathies.
William H. Cochrane, the defendant, was born in Cattaraugus
county, New York, in 1843, and when the Rebellion broke out,
a youth of 18, he enlisted in the Union army. He served until
October, 1864, and on his discharge obtained a clerkship in the
45 705
7O6 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
War Office, which he held for about two years. He came West
in April, 1867, and settled in Grand Rapids, Wis., where he
soon became Cashier in the First National Bank, a position
which he held all through and after his trial, the confidence of
his employers being unbroken by the tragical occurrence in
which he was concerned. He married in December, 1867, a
woman six years younger than himself, and a daughter, his only
child, was born in March, 1870. He was the owner of his own
home, and it was a domestic paradise unttf there came to Grand
Rapids a young lawyer from Missouri named Henry Hayden, a
man of splendid appearance, brilliant mental faculties, and a
plausible address. His abilities won him the position of County
Judge, and his manners established him quickly in the good
graces of the fair sex. He was a married man, with an accom
plished wife and a family of three children. In the fall of 1878
he began making advances to Mrs. Cochrane, first by raising his
hat and smiling when he met her, and then, meeting her on the
county fair-grounds, he introduced himself and Mrs. Hayden to
her. The acquaintance thus formed, he never lost an opportun
ity of meeting Mrs. Cochrane, and at length won her consent to
meet him on a lonely road on the outskirts of the town. Their
meetings after this were frequent, sometimes as often as thrice a
week, always after dark, and alone.
At this time Cochrane was busy in other ventures besides his
occupation at the bank. He was running a shingle-mill, and was
absent from early morning until the bank opened, and from sup
per-time until after midnight in the woods and looking after his
shingle-mill. Gossip soon fastened on his wife's reputation, and
everybody was aware of her shame except the husband himself.
At length, in June, 1879, she went on a trip to Minnesota, and
while she was gone word came to Mr. Cochrane that a clandes
tine correspondence had for some time been going on between
his wife and* Judge Hayden. He was able to intercept a letter
from his wife to Hayden, full of terms of endearment, such as
could only pass between paramours. He at once telegraphed to
his wife to come home, showed the letter to her mother, and on
his wife's return, meeting her with the evidence of her guilt,
elicited from her a full confession. An immediate separation fol
lowed, and later on a decree of divorce.
THREE CELEBRATED MURDER TRIALS. /O/
The guilty wife took up her abode with her mother. Her
confession was hardly made before it was known to the whole
town, and before long to the whole State of Wisconsin.
Hayden at once set to work to break the force of the confes
sion. He sent female emissaries to Mrs. Cochrane urging her to
deny any criminal intimacy either to Mrs. Hayden, or to the
Masonic committee who were about to investigate the matter.
He threatened her through his agents with the vengeance of his
friends, if she did not do as desired. Her mother was assured
that her daughter would be sent to the penitentiary for adultery
if she confessed the facts to either Mrs. Hayden or the committee.
Frightened by these threats, when Mrs. Cochrane was called
upon by Mrs. Hayden, she admitted everything but the criminal
intimacy, and when that point was reached by the Masonic com
mittee in its investigation, she declined to answer.
Hayden, however, did not seem to be content with having
ruined Cochrane's home, but seems to have organized a scheme
for the purpose of crying down Mrs. Cochrane's general reputa
tion. The remarks used in this campaign of scurrility and
defamation came to Cochrane's ears, driving him nearly wild.
His health failed under the mental burden and his brain became
diseased. He was sleepless, lost appetite and flesh, and his
changed condition was noticed by all his friends. Finally, Hayden
purchased a local newspaper, and in its second issue — on the 9th
of October, 1879 — appeared a lampooning article on Cochrane,
charging him with unfairness in accommodations at the bank
In his then excited state this seemed to Cochrane to fill up his
cup of bitterness, and he went to the neighborhood of Hayden's
office with a shotgun, met Hayden on the sidewalk, and killed
him.
The popular feeling in Grand Rapids was so strong that on the
suggestion of the State a change of venue was taken to Neillsville,
in the adjoining district. Parties were actively interested, some
to revenge Hayden and some to defend Cochrane, but the
majority of respectable people in the place were emphatically on
Cochrane's side. In Neillsville, when the case came to be tried,
popular feeling was found to be in the same direction, and it
was greatly promoted by the eloquence and skill with which
Mr. Storrs conducted the defense. The trial lasted ten days
JOS LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
commencing on the 6th of September, 1881. For the prosecu
tion appeared Mr. George L. Williams, the District-Attorney of
Wood county, in which Grand Rapids is situated, Judge Gate,
of Stevens Point, and Mr. J. P. C. Cottrill of Milwaukee. For
the defense were Mr. Storrs, and Messrs. Charles M. Webb and
G. R. Gardner, of Grand Rapids.
The attorneys for the State contented themselves with merely
proving the shooting. The opening for the defense was deferred
until the close of the case for the prosecution, when Mr. Storrs
addressed himself to the task before him, and made such an
effective presentation of the case that the effect was noticeable
at every moment during the trial. In his statement he recited
all the evidences of Mrs. Cochrane's guilt in detail, and put the
issue upon the broad ground that jurors treated all cases of this
character as questions of conscience, and that no court could
very well prevent them from so doing. Previous to this time
public opinion had been setting toward Cochrane, but this gave
it a great impetus, noticing which some of the counsel for the
prosecution became a little petulant. As a matter of course,
counsel for the defense took due advantage of this, and the pub
lic feeling increased in this direction until it was nearly unani
mous.
Mr. Storrs was especially severe in his denunciation of the
author of the slanderous article, — a partner of Hayden's, — whom
he characterized as "the purveyor of the buzzard, and the chore-
boy of the vulture." Mr. Cottrill, in his opening for the state,
had alluded to the attempt on the life of President Garfield as a
warning to jurors to be strict in such cases. Commenting on
this, Mr. Storrs said:
"I have nothing to say by way of comment upon the taste of such a
proceeding, but it seems to me that, rather than thus use such a calamity
— rather than stand over what we fear may be, and all hope may not be,
the dying couch of our good President, and use his groans and his suffer
ings to promote a prosecution of this character, I would pluck my very
tongue from my mouth. Bless God, the President of the United States,
sanctified in the hearts of 50,000,000 people, with his magnificent career
and illustrious achievements behind him, if he lives a glorious career
before him, and if he dies enshrined a pathetic, and tender, and sacred
memory in our hearts for all generations to come, was the head of a sweet,
a pure, and almost saintly home. Thank God, he never raided the sanc
tity of the home of a friend or acquaintance. Thank God, his life stands
THREE CELEBRATED MURDER TRIALS
out in such bright and shining contrast to the life of Hayden, that it seems
as if in his person the glory of the old commandment had been enshrined,
and the beauty of a sweet, and pure, and holy home had been embodied.
And if the attack of the miscreant upon our beloved President is to be made
the occasion of a justification for the despoiling and outraging of homes in
Wisconsin, God only can measure the infinite extent of that calamity!"
The court-room was filled with ladies during Mr. Storrs' open
ing. The eloquent counsel for the defense was warmly applauded,
and the Sheriff rather expostulated with the authors of the dis
turbance than interposed his authority to stop it.' Several wit
nesses, all leading citizens, of Grand Rapids, having testified to
Cochrane's excellent character, the defendant himself was examined,
and against the objections of the prosecution was permitted to
detail in full the story of his domestic wrong. His testimony
was mainly a recital of the confession made to him by his wife
on her return from Minnesota, of the investigation by the
Masonic lodge, of Hayden's efforts to forestall investigation by
sending lady friends to Mrs. Cochrane to persuade, and threaten
her into silence, and of the state of mind into which he was
thrown by the continued reports that came to him of Hayden's
sayings and doings, and by the publication of the slanderous
article in Hayden's paper. Mrs. Darling, the mother of Mrs.
Cochrane, testified to her daughter's confession of guilt, made to
Cochrane in her presence. His brother and his brother's \vife
both described, in a manner that drew tears from the ladies
present, the scene at their house when Mrs. Cochrane returned
from Minnesota, and how she and her mother besought them to
intercede with Cochrane not to send her only child away to his
own family in New York State. They also described his haggard
appearance, his loss of appetite, and his avoidance of social
intercourse. Similar testimony as to his changed condition was
given by his associates in the bank, by merchants who dealt
with him, and by the old lady who acted as his housekeeper
after the separation. Dr. Witter, who attended him in July,
1879, a month after the disclosure, said that the epileptoid con
dition of his brain, caused by excitement and sleeplessness,
would if continued greatly impair his will-power.
The case was remarkable on account of the legal questions
for the first time raised during its progress. The law of the
State of Wisconsin requires that, when the defense in such cases
7IO LIFE OF EMERY A. STORRS.
is insanity, it must be set up by a special plea. That issue
must first be tried separately, and, if the jury find the accused
not to have been insane at the time of the commission of the
offense, the trial of the facts under the general plea shall then
proceed before the same jury. The statue further provides that
if the defence of insanity is not specially pleaded, no evidence
can be given on that point during the trial. If it is pleaded
specially, and the defendant is beaten on the issue, the matters
involved in the plea shall not again be considered. The defend
ant's counsel did not deem it wise to set up this defense under
such circumstances, and were allowed to show facts illustrating
Cochrane's condition of mind, as bearing upon the question
whether or not he was able to form a premeditated design at the
time of the shooting. When the testimony was all in, however,
Mr. Storrs addressed a lengthy argument to the Court on the
unconstitutionally of the Wisconsin law, and asked instructions
favorable to his view on that point. He referred to the Consti
tution of the State, which provided that the right of trial by
jury should be inviolate, and claimed that this right was violated
by a law which required the defendant to go to trial first on an
issue where the presumption of law is against him, and where
he has to affirmatively prove the issue raised by his special plea.
The burden is thus shifted from the State to the defendant, and
Mr. Storrs cited numerous authorities to show that this was an
invasion of the defendant's constitutional rights. He also asked
that the Court instruct the jury that they were the judges of the
law as well as of the facts. On both points the Court ruled
against him, and but for the acquittal of the defendant the
Supreme Court of Wisconsin would have been called upon to
pass upon this statute for the first time — a statute which Mr.
Storrs described as having been drawn by some lawyer " crazy
on the subject of craziness, insane on the question of insanity."
In Mr. Cottrill's closing argument to the jury, and also in that
of Judge Cate, the fact of Hayden's criminal intercourse with Mrs.
Cochrane was treated as not proved, and Mr. Cottrill even referred
to her confession as testified to by her own mother as a story
invented for the purposes of the defense. This was effectively
demolished by Mr. Storrs in his closing argument, and the Court
at his request instructed the jury specially that the fact of the
THREE CELEBRATED MURDER TRIALS. /I I
adultery was not in issue, that affirmative testimony in regard to
it would not have been received if offered, and that Mrs. Cochrane
could not have been permitted to testify on her husband's behalf
on any matter involved in the trial. Mr. Cottrill took occasion
to declaim against the apparent sympathy of the bystanders with
the defendant, and sneered at the ladies for turning out in such
force to listen to the developments that had been made. This
gave Mr. Storrs a capital opportunity to improve the impression
he had already made in Cochrane's behalf, and he promptly"
availed himself of it. In his closing address to the jury, in which
he impressively recapitulated the story of the defendant's domestic
wrong, and appealed to them as men, and as husbands to put
themselves in Cochrane's place, and say whether they would not
have done under the same circumstances just what Cochrane had
done, he referred to the attack on the ladies present in the
following words:
"It is provided by the fundamental law of our land that the trial of all
cases shall be public. Civil liberty, and the protection of individual rights,
demand that these trials shall be public. Not only are the proceedings in
courts of justice public and private educators, but the sad experiences of
hundreds of years have abundantly taught us that there is no safety to the
liberty of the citizen when that liberty, or his rights, shall be inquired into
in a corner and determined in secret. The public are here, and have- been
here. These proceedings have been open and in the sunlight ; it is well
that they have been so. This defense has had nothing to conceal ; this
distinguished Judge has had no ruling to make which he desired to make
in secret. There has been nothing in the case, so far as we are con
cerned, that we would wish to have excluded one single second from the
public gaze. My brother Cottrill has seen fit to criticise and comment
upon the fact that the wives, and the mothers, and the daughters of
Clark County have been present during this trial. Is there any thing
improper in that, gentlemen ? Will not the presence of your wives, and
your sisters, and your daughters in court during the pendency of judicial inves
tigations smooth down the rugged features of the trial, and bring us lawyers to
a decenter and higher regard for the average proprieties of life than we
would have if we barbarized among our own sex exclusively ? \Vhy should
they not be here? This case involves questions very near and very dear
to them. In this case are involved considerations of the sanctity of the
marriage relation, of the purity of home, of domestic peace, honor, quiet,
and tranquillity, and of the right to repel the invader of either. Who of
all others are most interested in questions of this character? I make no
doubt that it is because their hearts and their instincts, truer a thousand
fold than the mere abstractions of our reasoning, have told them precisely
and surely what this case wmeant and the solemn issues which it involved."
712 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORRS.
Mr. Storrs urged upon the jury that practically, in every crim
inal case, they decided the law as well as the facts beyond the
power of reversal or appeal when they found a verdict of not
guilty, and that in every case they would find it exceedingly
difficult to separate law from fact. Theirs was the final respon
sibility, and no human being could interfere with them in dis
charging themselves of it. He claimed that the State had utterly
failed to show a premeditated design on Cochrane's part, their
witnesses as to his declarations of intent being impeached by the
overwhelming testimony of the best citizens of Grand Rapids, and
the evidence of these witnesses being squarely denied by the
defendant himself. On the other hand, every fact which the
defense had proposed to prove had been amply and conclusively
established.
The popular sentiment being so strongly in favor of Cochrane,
the charge of Judge Newman was somewhat of a surprise for its
severity against the defendant. It was, in effect, a direct charge
for a conviction. He told the jury that there was no evidence to
bring the shooting of Hayden within the legal definitions of
justifiable or excusable homicide; and, replying to the argu
ment of Mr. Storrs, he said that though the jury had the
power to disregard the instructions of the court as to the law,
they had not the right to do so. The law had provided redress
for the wrong done Cochrane, and he could not be permitted
to wreak his own private vengeance.
The jury were out twenty-four hours. From the beginning
of their deliberations, they stood eleven to one for acquittal ; and
it was only after a night of durance in which beds and other
comforts were denied them that they became unanimous, and
returned into court with a verdict of not guilty.
Their verdict had been anticipated by the public. As soon as
it was delivered, and Cochrane came out a free and vindicated
man, the people of Neillsville thronged the streets from the
court-house to the hotel to congratulate him as he passed along,
and surely never before had a person on trial for murder such a
triumphal reception on his deliverance. The ladies of Neillsville,
who had sustained him by their presence all through the trial,
improvised an elegant lunch in honor of the jury, of Cochrane,
and of his counsel. The ladies themselves acted as waiters, and
THREE CELEBRATED MURDER TRIALS. /1 3
congratulatory speeches were made by Messrs. Storrs and Webb,
of counsel for the defense, and by General Dodge, formerly
United States Senator from Iowa, who hailed the verdict as
an honor to human nature. Mr. Storrs in his speech said
that the result showed that courts and Legislatures in vain
opposed themselves to the instincts of our common humanity,
and praised the ladies for being as usual on the right side.
At Merrillon the defendant and his counsel were greeted with
a serenade by a local band; a torchlight procession at Grand
Rapids demonstrated the satisfaction with which his fellow-
citizens there received the news of Cochrane's acquittal. And
so, amid flowers, festivity, music, and fireworks, this celebrated
murder trial came to what the good folks of Western Wiscon
sin no doubt considered a fitting termination.
The Chicago, St. Paul, and Milwaukee papers gave full reports
of the trial, and the Chicago Times, commenting on the case,
said:
"The acquittal, under the circumstances, is without a parallel. In the
Cole-Hiscock case, the defense of insanity was in for all it was worth,
and it was on that ground alone that the defendant was acquitted. In
the Sickles case the defense of insanity was in for all it was worth. In
the McFarland case, and in fact in all three of those cases, by the law
of the states where they were tried, the jury were made the judges of
the law and the facts. But in this case all evidence tending to show
insanity was excluded, as well as all evidence tending to show a diseased
condition of the brain, whether it amounted to insanity or not; and there
being no statutory provision making the jury the judges of the law, the
court assumed absolutely to direct them as to the law.
"This case furnishes about the only case on record of a square deliver
ance without any insanity dodge, so-called. It was a direct assertion by
the jury that under such circumstances as appeared in this case, the
slaying of the seducer of a man's wife is justifiable homicide.
' • This seems to be human nature, and while the courts have been
butting against it for a great many years, nothing has been, so far, hurt
by it but the heads of the courts."
Hardly had he had time to settle down again to office practice,
after taking part in the Chicago obsequies of President Garfield,
of whose death he learned while journeying homeward from
Neillsville, before he was called upon to engage in another
trial of a similiar character, — the defence of a man accused
of murder, — in which the details were also of a very painful
character, and in regard to which local feeling ran so high
714 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
that Mr. Storrs ran the risk of actual bodily injury, and
possibly death, at the hands of the deceased man's friends.
The case was similar in many respects to the Cochrane case,
but widely dissimilar in the expressions of popular feeling
both during and after the trial. Instead of an audience of
sympathetic ladies, he had now to encounter a mob clamor
ous for vengeance on the defendant, and ready to enforce
lynch law.
The accused, Porter C. Ransom, had been twice Mayor of
the City of El Paso, in Woodford County Illinois. The man
he killed was Henry W. Bullock, a lawyer of the same place.
The troubles between them grew out of political differences.
Both were Democrats, but Ransom was a New Yorker and
loyal to the Union, while Bullock was a Kentuckian of the
"Copperhead" stripe. In the county convention in 1868 Ran
som and his friends supported one nominee for a local office,
while Bullock and his adherents favored another. The candi
date supported by Ransom obtained the nomination, and from
that time forward Bullock became Ransom's avowed enemy,
never omitting an opportunity from day to day, in saloons
on the streets, and in all public places, to vilify and traduce
the man to whom he principally owed his disappointment.
Matters ran along this way till Ransom was elected for the
second time Mayor of El Paso, in 1878. Up to this time he
had been highly respected in the community, had been twice
elected Justice of the Peace in a rural township, and had
already served with credit one term as Mayor. But now a
cloud appeared on the horizon of his reputation. In his
green youth, in New York State, he had married a woman
nearly twice his own age, and, after living unhappily with
her for a brief period, he left the homestead in her posses
sion and came West, to begin life anew in the State of Illi
nois. His New York wife soon consoled herself by marrying
another man, to whom she bore five children. Thirty years
had elapsed since this episode of his youth, and Mr. Ran
som was again married and had a family in El Paso. The
second husband of his former wife having died, she started
inquiries about Ransom, and having discovered that he was
the chief municipal officer of a thriving Western city, she
THREE CELEBRATED MURDER TRIALS. /I 5
began proceedings against him for alimony and divorce. It was
blackmail that was wanted, and Bullock was hired as the local
attorney to carry on the proceedings.
Inspired by political and personal hatred of the man, Bul
lock was not content with proceeding against him in court,
but made use of the knowledge he had gained through this
suit to vilify and abuse Ransom throughout El Paso. He suc
ceeded in creating such a reputation for his opponent that when
Ransom came forward as a candidate for a "third term" of the
Mayoralty, in the spring of iSSi, he was rejected by a slight
majority.
Friends interposed to persuade Bullock to cease his attacks
upon Ransom. An old gentleman, one of the first proprietors
of the land on which El Paso was built, went at Ransom's
request to ask him to desist from his public abuse, and, as he
said on the trial: "He requested that I should see Mr. Bul
lock and reason with him and try to get him to stop the
public abuse on the streets. He made this remark, that so far
as being the attorney on the opposite side in the case for ali
mony was concerned, that was all right. He did not care any
thing about that, but the public abuse on the streets was
what he objected to. He told me to say to Mr. Bulluck all
that was past he would forgive, and shake hands with him if
he would let him alone. I saw Mr. Bullock in a day or two
afterwards and stated what Mr. Ransom had requested me to
do, and Mr. Bullock's reply was: 'Gibson, I will never let up
as long as I live; I will follow him to the penitentiary or to
hell.'"
The failure of Mr. Gibson's mission was communicated to
Ransom, and he then knew that the quarrel must go on to
the bitter end. In the meantime his second wife had died,
his home was desolate, and he was preparing to sell off and
leave El Paso, when the fatal altercation came. On the even-,
ing of the 2d of May, iSSi, he was coming down to keep
an appointment with the lion. T. M. Shaw, of Lacon, his
attorney in the alimony suit. Passing along on the main street
of El Paso he found Bullock in conversation with another man,
and just as he passed Bullock made an insulting remark in
reference to him. Ransom turned and asked for a retraction,
/l6 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
and Bullock merely retorted by saying twice over, "I never
take anything back, you damned old thief." Not content with
these opprobrious words, he rushed upon Ransom, seized him
by the throat, and pressed him up against the wall. Ransom
fearing for his own life, shot his assailant, and the wound was
fatal. Hardly realizing what he had done, Ransom went on to
the hotel in El Paso, where he had appointed to meet Mr.
Shaw. Having told that gentleman what had occurred, he went
out and surrendered himself to the Marshal.
The slain man, notwithstanding his roughness, his addiction to
drinking and vulgar language, had made himself popular with
a certain class in that community. He was both an inveterate
hater and an enthusiastic friend. Consequently his death excited
strong feeling in El Paso, and throughout the adjoining town
ships where his father's family had been settled ever since the
county was laid out. Two of his brothers had held the office
of Sheriff of Woodford County. The deceased man had by
his freehandedness and liberality in saloons and elsewhere won
for himself a large following among the lower classes. When
Ransom was locked up in the caliboose of El Paso that night
it was deemed necessary to place a guard over him to pre
vent mob violence^ and he was speedily removed after the
Coroner's inquest to the County jail at Peoria, whence he was
removed to Lacon, a change of venue from Woodford County
having been taken.
The trial commenced at Lacon before Judge Burns on the
1 6th of January, 1882, and extended over three weeks. Three
entire days were consumed in getting a jury. The prosecu
ting attorneys of Woodford county, where the shooting took place,
and of Marshall county, of which Lacon is the county seat,
were reinforced by a criminal lawyer who in his day had con
siderable notoriety, — Mr. W. W. O'Brien. This gentleman,
down to the last few years of his life, had practised law in
Peoria, and it was in his office that Henry Bullock had read
law as a student. He had been so long accustomed to prior
ity at the Peoria bar that his manners were aggressive, not to
say belligerent; he had drawn a pistol on a country attorney
who opposed him in a murder case in an adjoining circuit;
and his bullying and overbearing ways were not only tolera-
THREE CELEBRATED MURDER TRIALS.
ted, but won him deference, in the rural courts where up to
this time he had been chiefly known. But in Mr. Storrs he
met more than his match. It was amusing to see, day after
day, this blustering Hiberian giant attempt to lead his wit
nesses to give incompetent answers t^ improper questions, and
the slim, wiry little advocate for the defendant, thoroughly cool
and self-possessed, promptly check the words on the ready wit
ness' lips, with "Wait a moment, sir; I object." Thereupon a
duel of words, — it could hardly be called a debate, for the logic
and the law were all in the quiet, incisive speeches of Mr.
Storrs, and mere noise and sophistry on the other side,—
would occupy the time of the court for nearly an hour, at
the end of which Judge Burns would try to throw oil on the
troubled waters by suggesting a form of question which brought
Mr. O'Brien a little nearer to his object, without letting in
incompetent testimony. Mr. O'Brien generally adopted the sug
gestions of the Court, led the witness as far as he could by
this means to give the answer he desired, and then coolly
propounded the same leading question over again, to be met
with Mr. Storrs' ever ready objection. On one of these occa
sions, after arguing his point with his usual persistence, Mr.
Storrs said: "I do not wonder that the learned counsel should
disregard, as he habitually does, the admonitions of the Court,
for in his practice he has been more accustomed to address
his prayers to the angel of mercy than to the goddess of jus
tice." Mr. O'Brien's practice was almost entirely in the defence
of criminals, and his appearance on the prosecuting side was a
rare occurence, his services on such occasions being generally
secured by subscription among his own countrymen for vin
dictive purposes. In this case he appeared as the personal
friend, companion, and avenger of Bullock. The point of Mr.
Storrs' reference to the angel of mercy, and Mr. O'Brien's
unfamiliarity with the goddess of justice, was at once appre
ciated. Mr. O'Brien lost temper, and endeavored again to press
a question which had been repeatedly ruled out; the Judge
again attempted to dispose of the objection by suggesting
another form of question. After allowing this to go on sev
eral times, Mr. Storrs at last found it necessary to insist per
emptorily upon his objection. Mr. O'Brien retorted by saying,
/1 8 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
—UI see an organized purpose here to object to everything
and to embarrass me in everything I say." Mr. Storrs replied,
— "There is a purpose, growing out of our duty, to object
to every question that Mr. O'Brien puts to any witness which
we think is improper in form or in substance. I believe Mr.
O'Brien is entirely conscious that a great number of the ques
tions which he has addressed to this witness, to which we
have objected, and the objections to which the Court has sus
tained, are improper questions. I don't believe he intends to
play pranks with the Court, but if I did not know him bet
ter I should think that was his object." Whereupon Mr
O'Brien, drawing himself up to his full height, exclaimed, " Then
you put it upon the charitable ground that I don't know any
better?" To which Mr. Storrs responded, "I know you know,
better, but I think you woke up this morning in excellent
spirits, and are working them off in that way."
Later on, Mr. Storrs objected to Mr. O'Brien's making a
post-mortem argument on a question which the Court had
already decided against him. Getting tired of pressing objec
tions to leading questions, he said, "The only thing I care
for is that the jury may be able to distinguish between the
testimony of Mr. O'Brien and that of the witness." The
Court having again suggested a form of question which would
get around the objection raised, Mr. Storrs, with great suavity,
made an appeal for a positive ruling. "There is one thing,"
he said, "which I would like to suggest here, with great
deference to your Honor. We will be very glad to avoid
the assistance which Mr. O'Brien derives from the excellent
suggestions which your Honor has made as to the manner
of putting questions. It is very kind of your Honor; they
are very good suggestions; that is the trouble with them.
It increases the number of counsel, for the time being, for
the prosecution." Judge Burns, coloring a little, said, "I do
not mean to become a counsel." Mr. Storrs replied. "I know
you do not; but it is a case where the spirit is willing and
the flesh is weak. We suggest, with the utmost deference,
that it would be better if the case would take a little less
educational form, and not be quite so much in the nature of
a law school, but more in the character of a law suit."
THREE CELEBRATED MURDER TRIALS.
"Well, sir," said Judge Burns, "can you suggest any form?"
"Yes," retorted Mr. Storrs; "we suggest the entire abandon
ment of this question, as the only proper way to dispose of it."
It is impossible to convey to those who were not person
ally acquainted with both these lawyers, the ludicrous contrast
they presented in this strife of words. "Billy" O'Brien, as
he was familiarly called, was over six feet high, and weighed
about three hundred pounds ; Emery Storrs was not above
five feet, and weighed about a hundred and thirty. The
ladies of a Methodist church had gotten up a bazaar for
church purposes in Lacon, and sold a very substantial lunch
every day about the hour for adjournment of the court.
They had not, of course, an opportunity of seeing Mr. Storrs
in court, and when an invitation was sent him to take his
lunch at the church bazaar, they were on the outlook for an
athlete of the proportions of Mr. O'Brien. One day during
the trial, Mr. Storrs walked quietly in with one of the asso
ciate counsel, took his lunch, and retired as unobtrusively as
he came. The church ladies were sorely disappointed when
they learned that he had been entertained by them unawares,
and could not be made to believe for some time that " the
little man who had fooled them" was holding his own so
bravely up at the court-house.
Sometimes the encounter of wits between Mr. O'Brien and
Mr. Storrs took a pleasanter form. One witness who had tes
tified to Bullock's threats against Ransom was being cross-
examined by Mr. O'Brien, who put to him the question,
"Did he say he was going to send him to the penitentiary?"
The witness answered, " He said he was going to send
him to hell. I do not know how he would get him there."
Mr. Storrs said, " The penitentiary holds the same relation to
hell that the Sunday-school does to the church ; it is a kind
of vestibule." Another witness was the engineer at some
works at El Paso, and was giving his testimony in a very
deliberate and cautious manner. Becoming impatient at his
slowness, Mr. O'Brien said, "Come, sir, you say you drive
an engine; can't you get on a little faster?" Mr. Storrs was
instantly ready with a repartee: "You forget," he said, "that
this witness runs a stationary engine."
72O LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
Judge Burns conducted the trial with great dignity, but it
was with the utmost difficulty that order could be preserved
in the court-room, owing to the disorderly behavior of the
El Paso mob, who cheered Mr. O'Brien and kept up a con
tinual clamor while Mr. Storrs was speaking. As eye witness,
reporting the case for the Chicago Tribune said:
" Rarely has such a scene been witnessed in any civilized part of the
United States as was exhibited in the Lacon court-room. In the wildest
frontier towns of Texas, Arkansas, or New Mexico, no more savage and •
belligerent crowd of half-civilized roughs thirsting for blood ever congre
gated and attempted to overawe judicial proceedings by their indecent
demonstrations. While the State's Attorney of Woodford County quietly
and impartial)' played his little part, Mr. O'Brien was turbulent and
aggressive, brow-beating the Court, appealing to the sweet voices of the
mob, and nothing but the calm diplomacy of Mr. Storrs could have pre
vented an outbreak of violence in the court-room. Threatening letters by
anonymous hands were sent to the Judge during the last days of the trial,
and a conspiracy to do bodily violence to Mr. Storrs was discovered by the
Sheriff of Marshall County only in time to prevent its being carried into
execution. The Court, however, carried the trial to its close with immova-
able dignity. The case was given to the jury on Friday night, after a
tedious investigation of three weeks, and on Saturday morning on the com
ing in of the court the jury returned a verdict of not guilty,
" From the time the jury were instructed and retired there was no serious
disagreement between them. Before 8 o'clock in the morning counsel were
notified that the jury had agreed. Having been advised that writs had
been issued on trumped-up charges to arrest and take Ransom back
immediately after a verdict in his. favor, he was not discharged, but
returned to jail, where he was visited by a great many of the leading citi
zens of Lacon.
"It is only just to say, in reference to the scenes of disdurbance in
Court, that the pretty village of Lacon contributed nothing towards them,
nor can these tumults be ascribed to the order-loving portion of El Paso or
Woodford County. It is also but just to say that it was owing to the
prompt and most positive interference of Mr. O'Brien that the scheme for
arresting Ransom and running him off into Woodford County, there to do
him violence, was not carried into effect. He denounced it at once, and it
was abandoned."
As was the case at Neillsville, Mr. Storrs was permitted to
reserve his opening for the defence until after the State had
closed their case, and in reciting the circumstances of the homi
cide and setting forth the theory of self-defence, he took the
opportunity to review the evidence for the prosecution. Mr.
O'Brien indignantly protested against Mr. Storrs being thus
THREE CELEBRATED MURDER TRIALS. /2I
allowed the privilege of two replies on the part of the defence,
and animadverted severely upon this in his closing argument.
He was doubly chagrined when, as appears to be the practice
in the circuit to which Woodford and Marshall counties belong,
the instructions to the jury, after being passed upon by the
Judge, were read by counsel on either side instead of by the
Judge himself. This afforded Mr. Storrs another splendid oppor
tunity, of which he seized the full advantage. The instructions
given on behalf of the State were read by Mr. Newell, the
State's Attorney of Woodford county. Mr.» Storrs had an adroit
way of incorporating into his instructions the salient facts of
the case on which he relied for a verdict, and had marshaled
his instructions in their logical order, so that when he came
to read them to the jury, with all the magical power of his
penetrating voice and rhetorical emphasis, the reading had all
the force and effect of a closing argument for the defence.
He read from a printed copy. Mr. O'Brien had not been pre
pared for this procedure, but when told that it was the regu
lar practice, was obliged to submit, and listened in grim silence
to Mr. Storrs' closing declamation.
The conspiracy to assault Mr. Storrs was formed among
some of the El Paso witnesses for the State, whom he had
handled severely on cross-examination, and castigated unmerci
fully in his opening argument. For some days, these men
watched their opportunity to waylay him as he walked from
the office of his colleague, Mr. Shaw, to his lodgings on the
outskirts of the town. As they patronized the saloons of Lacon
pretty freely, their conspiracy leaked out, and came to the
knowledge of the Sheriff, who appointed a number of special
deputies to "shadow" Mr. Storrs, and see that he came to no
harm.
As soon as the news of Ransom's acquittal reached El Paso,
an indignation meeting was held, at which resolutions were
adopted declaring the act of Ransom to have been " a delib
erate, cold-blooded, and cruel murder," that the verdict had
been secured "by a manifest and conscienceless distortion of
facts by his lawyers and the partial, unfair, and unjust rulings
of the Court, and the biased and most extraordinary instruct-
tions to the jury," declaring Mr. Storrs' conduct, and that of his
46
/22 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
colleagues on the trial, "simply infamous," and calling upon
Judge Burns to resign. The correspondent of the Chicago Trib
une was also denounced for his description of the mob in the
court-room, who were declared to be "the most orderly and
law-abiding citizens of this community, men who could by a
word have had Ransom hanged to the nearest tree, but who
counseled moderation and the invocation of the law for his
punishment." After this flattering account of themselves, these
moderate men resolved that lynch law was after all the pre
ferable way of disposing of such cases. The meeting was
addressed by three gentlemen with "Rev." prefixed to their
names, presumably ministers of the gospel, all of whom advo
cated lynch law, and passionately denounced Ransom, his attor
neys, and Judge Burns especially, in not overdecent language.
Some of the attorneys engaged in the prosecution were present
at the meeting, but they very properly declined to take any part
in the proceedings. Judge Burns did not resign.
Mr. Storrs soon found occasion to realize the advantage of
keeping a copy of every paper, and a transcript of every argu
ment made by him in the trial of a case. Changing only the
names and dates, he used the selfsame printed copy of instruc
tions that he had presented in the Ransom case, in another
murder trial in which he was engaged in the spring of 1883.
Two notorious sporting characters, Jerry Dunn and Jim Elliott,
had a falling out in the beginning of that year, and each was
goaded on to enmity against the other by the manner in which
the sporting reporters of the Chicago morning papers wrote up
their "interviews." Elliott was a pugilist, and Dunn figured on
the turf and in gambling circles. Elliott, on the day of their
fatal encounter, had been about saloons in Chicago, breathing out
threatenings and slaughter against Dunn; and Dunn, when cau
tioned to avoid him, showed a pistol, and boasted that he was
quite prepared for the meeting. On the evening of the first of
March, 1883, Dunn went into a restaurant on Dearborn street
kept by one Langdon, and found Elliott sitting there with a pro
fessional oarsman named Plaisted. He at once drew -his revolver,
and began shooting at Elliott. Whether both men fired at each
other on sight, or whether Dunn was the first to open hostilities,
could not be determined from the evidence, for on both sides
THREE CELEBRATED MURDER TRIALS. 723
there was on this point some very free and easy swearing. The
two ruffians clinched and fell on the floor of the restaurant, and
while scuffling there, Dunn emptied his revolver into Elliott's
body, and killed him. Dunn was arrested, indicted for murder,
and his trial began in the Criminal Court of Cook County, before
Judge Smith, on the /th of May of the same year. The State's
attorney, Mr. L. L. Mills, rather took Mr. Storrs by surprise by
the conciseness and brevity of his opening. He merely stated
the law of the State of Illinois as to murder, manslaughter, and
justifiable homicide, taking care to impress upon the jury that
the test of justifiable homicide was not what the defendant might
have thought, or might say he thought, as to the danger of
bodily injury to himself, but what a reasonable man placed in
such circumstances would think; and contending that in order
to justify the homicide, the danger must be imminent, and mani
fested by some overt act on the part of the deceased. Mr.
Storrs, in accordance with the Cook County practice, made an
opening speech for the defendant, following Mr. Mills. He cau
tioned the jury to dismiss from their minds all prejudice that
might have been engendered by newspaper reports.
"I recognize," he said, "as thoroughly as it is possible for any man to
recognize, the force of a well informed and intelligently advised public
opinion. I believe that it is pretty nearly always right upon the premises
upon which it is founded; but it will be a sad day in the history of our
institutions, and for the preservation of any interest which we hold dear,
when this fictitious and frothy public opinion, Tgenerated from malicious
falsehood, shall enter into the jury box, or to any extent usurp justice in
the performance of her duties."
He then gave a sketch of the careers of the two men, describ
ing Dunn as a patriotic soldier of the Union, but failing to give
any satisfactory account of him since the close of the war, and
hastily dismissing that part of the subject, tracing Elliott's crimi
nal record, and characterizing him as a thief, a midnight robber,
and an assassin, — a man with whom the decenter kind of pro
fessional pugilists refused to associate. Next he spoke of the
warnings Dunn had received that Elliott was lying in wait for
him ; claimed, as he had done in the Sullivan and Ransom cases,
that Dunn had a right to arm himself for his own protection.;
and cited authorities in support of the doctrine of self-defence,
from jurists who, he said, were not "judicial eunuchs" in any
724 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
sense, but were masculine and manly at all points. He appealed
to the jury to say whether they would wait for an overt act
before putting themselves in an attitude of defence, and claimed
that the mere presence of Elliott, after the threats he had made,
was of itself an overt act, justifying Dunn in shooting, as much
as if he had met a panther in his path.
The testimony as to the commencement of the duel was
conflicting, but Mr. Storrs had an abundance of witnesses to
prove the threats that Elliott had made, and also the danger
ous and desperate character of the man. State's Attorney Mills
had records from New York and Philadelphia, and police
officials from both cities, to prove Dunn's record since the
close of his patriotic services in the field, as an offset to the
testimony against Elliott's character; but Mr. Storrs very
sagaciously decided not to put Dunn on the stand to tell his
own story, and thus an interesting cross-examination was cut
off, and this class of evidence was shut out. Judge Smith
approved and gave all of Mr. Storrs' patent instructions on
behalf of Dunn, but the admittedly bad and dangerous char
acter of Elliott had also its weight with the jury, and Dunn
was acquitted.
CHAPTER XLI.
HISTORICAL CHICAGO.
LECTURE ON BEHALF OF THE HISTORICAL SOCIETY— AN EFFORT OF LASTING
INTEREST — THE HEART OF A GREAT EMPIRE — CHICAGO'S FAMOUS HIS
TORIC WIGWAM — THE GREATEST LOSS SUFFERED IN THE GREAT FIRE OF
!8;i — THE PAST, THE PRESENT, AND MR. STORRS* IDEAS OF THE GARDEN-
CITY — FACTS AND FANCIES.
ONE of the most irreparable losses inflicted upon Chicago
by the Great Fire was the destruction of the Historical
Society's building. Organized in 1856, the purpose of the
society was to collect and preserve all writings or articles which
might in any way pertain to the history of Chicago, or of the
North-west. The last pamphlet statement of the condition of the
organization published previous to the Great Fire, namely the
statement of 1868, showed that in the modest structure, known
as the Chicago Historical Society building, there were at that
date more than 15,000 bound volumes of a historical nature, 1,700
files of newspapers, 5,000 manuscripts, 1,200 maps and charts,
and an excellent collection of paintings and portraits ; the build
ings and grounds were valued at about $60,000. It was claimed,
also, that the library was almost complete in the documents and
publications of the United States government in every depart
ment, from the date of the Constitution. Among the treasures
were such priceless documents as that of Lincoln's original manu
script copy of the Emancipation Proclamation, but they were de
stroyed by the holocaust. In addition, a debt was left to be wiped
out by such men as the late Isaac N. Arnold, Mark Skinner, the
late Thomas Hoyne and the Hon. John Wentworth, a debt con
tracted in completing the hall which had been burned; but
December, 1882, found this sum fully paid, the organization free
725
/26 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
from debt, the owner of a corner lot upon which to erect an
appropriate edifice, and with bequests for books and other pur
poses exceeding in value $75,000; it also found the organization
trying to crowd into inadequate quarters a rapidly acquired and
rapidly increasing collection of valuables, including over 30,000
volumes relating to history, biography, and statistics. It was,
accordingly, a tribute to the rare powers of Mr. Storrs — a most
direct acknowledgment of an almost phenomenal fact in life
that a prophet should be honored at home; but a fact, it may
be added, which was again and again made manifest by nearly
every organization, whether political, religious, or otherwise, in
the city of his choice — that the Chicago Historical Society, one
evening of November, 1882, unanimously adopted the following
resolutions: "Resolved, that the President and Executive Com
mittee of this society be requested to invite the Hon. Emery A.
Storrs to deliver a lecture before this society at his convenience
on such a subject as he may select, the proceeds of which shall
be appropriated toward the erection of a new building for the
society." The reply of Mr. Storrs was as follows:
"CHICAGO, Nov. 28,1882.
"The Honorable Isaac N. Arnold, President of Chicago Historical Society:
" MY DEAR SIR : — Your favor announcing the resolution of the Historical
Society, inviting me to deliver a lecture for its benefit has been received.
"I certainly esteem it a very great privilege, as it will be to me a great
pleasure, to contribute in any degree to the future success and establish
ment on a broad and permanent basis of so useful a society.
"It needs a home, and a fitting home; one in which the records of the
great and rapidly growing city may be safely deposited and preserved for
the present and for all the future.
"I gladly accept the invitation, which, on behalf of your society, you have
extended to me, and would suggest Dec. 15, proximo, as a time which
would entirely suit my convenience.
"I would name as the subject, 'Historical Chicago; its Past, Present,
and Future:' '
"Yours most respectfully,
" EMERY A. STORRS."
The night named was one of intense cold, but a large and
enthusiastic audience assembled at Central Music hall, and, in
addition to door receipts, some $25,000 was subscribed towards
a fund of $100,000 for a new Historical Hall. The lecture was
as follows :
" Mr. President, Ladies, and Gentlemen : In no city in the world, and in
HISTORICAL CHICAGO. /2/
no city of which history gives us any record, so far as I am aware, can
such a spectacle be presented as is witnessed here to-night — a vast me
tropolitan and cosmopolitan city of a population exceeding 600,000, with a
commercial magnitude and extent even beyond its population, so young that
scores of those who rocked its cradle at its birth are still living, and hale,
hearty men, engaged in the active enterprises of the day and hour. Many
of the founders of this city are here tc-night. They saw the fields upon
which this city stands when they were merely fields. They saw the stream
upon which to-day floats a vast commerce when its waters were unvexed.
save by the canoe of the Indian. They have seen what are now the sites
of great business palaces when they were wild prairie fields. They saw the
fields a village, the village a young and struggling city, and the young
and struggling city finally the heart of a great empire.
"Of what other city can this be said? And the marvel of this is not
confined to the city alone, but its growth has been only commensurate with
the growth of the great country about it, and from which it has drawn its
prosperity and greatness. Indeed, the story of a growth so wonderful must
possess an interest for all the world: and whether the records from which
that story is to be intelligently and wisely told are* to be preserved by the
men who have made and are making the history of this wonderful city,
whether they are to be carefully gathered and placed in a fitting home,
secure for all the future, is the question of the moment, and to consider
and determine which this splendid audience has been gathered in this beau
tiful temple.
"Historical Chicago cuts no unimportant figure, and fills no unimportant
space in the history of the world and of this generation. The Chicago of
to-day rests upon every event, great and small, which has transpired since
1833, whew first it was a village ; since 1837, when first it dignified itself
by the name of city; and hence it is true that what the Chicago of to-day
really is cannot be determined upon an observation of what we to-day see,
but must be extended back over those periods, beginning with its birth and
tracing the history of its men and its events down to the present moment.
"The great events in the history of this wonderful city come thronging
upon us, and hardly need to be recalled. It is said that its growth has
been merely physical and material; that no poems have been written here,
and that nothing has been done for art, but I think that those men who
have within half a century builded an empire, who have within half a cen
tury, from a malarial swamp and a tangled wilderness, reared n great city,
have made, in the empire and in the city, in its larger and broader sense,
a poem as grand as poet ever wrote. It would astonish the old settler of
Chicago to be told that he was in any sense a poet ; but I must believe
that, however hardy and rugged and matter of fact his life may have been,
the man who fifty years ago looked upon leagues and leagues of unbroken
plain and prairie and saw in them in the near future a great empire — that
the man who looked upon a malarious and pestilential swamp and bog,
and saw in it in the near future a great, thriving, splendid and prosperous
city, possessed, although he knew it not, the true poet's imagination.
LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
'The forms of things unknown,
Turned them to shapes, and gave to airy nothing
A local habitation and a name.'
" Historical Chicago is the rude village of 1833. It is earlier than that; it
is the strong, brave men and the resolute and helpful women who on the
very frontier made that village. Historical Chicago is that growth, through
all difficulties, which carried the village forward to a pushing and ambi-
ous little city in 1837. It is that same resolute spirit, as hopeful as it was
brave, which pushed, through difficulties apparently insurmountable, the
young city, with its huts and cabins, resting on the shores of Lake Michi
gan, -at the head of the chain of the great lakes, into a position so con
spicuous that in 1848 it was deemed of sufficient consequence to hold a
great national convention, where the improvement of our rivers and our
harbors should be discussed and considered. It is the same city, pushed
by the same men, backed by the resolute community of earnest men and
women filling up the country about it, which went forward and forward
until in 1854 and 1855 and 1856 it began to be known as a great grain
market, its river thronged with the fleets of the lakes, and finally it
anchored itself so strongly that not even the great financial panic of 1857
was sufficient to destroy it.
" Historical Chicago is that energy and forecast which from small begin
nings made it the focal point for mighty railroad enterprises connecting the
great lakes and the great Northwest with the seaboard. Its fame extended,
because the men of Chicago noised its fame abroad. It was the home of
Douglas: it was where Lincoln was glad to be; and here, in 1860, twelve
years after the river and harbor convention, a great political National con
vention was held, which brought men from all over the country, and in its
famous historic wigwam, Abraham Lincoln was nominated for the Presi
dency of the United States.
" But it was to be the theatre of another event, most startling and tragic
in character, one which would appall the world, and the like of which in
the extent of its calamitous consequences the world had never before wit
nessed. This great city, pushed forward to such a splendid position of
material and physical greatness, striken and devastated by flame and fire,
by a conflagration so vast that thousands and tens of thousands of homes
were destroyed in a night ; hundreds and hundreds of the business build
ings swallowed up in flame and smoke ; thousands of families homeless and
houseless, and prostrated in the ashes of her desolation — the great city,
then even historical, losing none of her resolution, received, in such a
fashion as makes her forevermore the debtor of all peoples and of all
nations, the splendid benefactions and charities of the world. How the
stricken city redeemed itself — how its men and women worked — with what
noble heroism they toiled to rebuild their devastated city, and to restore
their shattered fortunes, history will never weary of telling. Unappalled by
this disaster, undismayed where it seemed that courage itself would have
been dismayed, the old spirit of the old settler was in historic Chicago ;
and the destroyed city of brick has been rebuildcd a city of marble.
HISTORICAL CHICAGO. /2Q
"It is in no spirit of boasting that I recount these great achievements of
Chicago. The commerce of Venice and of Carthage were playthings merely
compared with the vast commerce of this city. Its granaries feed all the
world ; the smoke of its furnaces obscures the sky : its trade goes every
where that human wants are to be supplied. The zeal and energy of its
citizens know no limits. It stands midway between the two oceans,
exchanging the products of the Orient for those of the Occident, and clasp
ing the hands of the peaceful Pacific with those of the stormy and turbu
lent Atlantic.
"The Chicago of to-day is made up of all the events of the Chicago of
the past : and the Chicago of the future will be in kind such as the, Chi
cago of the present is. It has been wisely said that all history is merely
aggregated biography, and there is no great, worthy event connected with
the birth and with the growth of Chicago which has not entered into it and
makes a part of it. Carlyle has profoundly and beautifully said :
"'Under the green foliage and blossoming fruit trees of to-day, there lie
rotting, slower or faster, the forests of all other yews and bays. Some
have rotted fast, plants of annual growth, and are long since quite gone
to inorganic mold : others are like the aloe ; growths that last a thousand
or three thousand years.'
"Historical Chicago has from the beginning been, and still is a thor
oughly typical and representative city. Its growth and development result
not merely from the resolution and energy of its own citizens, but the spirit
which it embodies is the spirit of the entire North-west. Nay more ; it is
the chosen theatre where enterprise from all parts of the country, finding
abundant opportunities, exhibits itself in its largest fields. Chicago repre
sents the thrift and sagacity of Boston and of New England : it represents
and has incorporated the broad commercial characteristics of the city of
New York and of the Empire State : it represents the industrial energies of
the old Keystone, and the personal and individual independence of the South.
Chicago is business enterprise on a large scale embodied : and the enter
prising man, no matter where he may be born, is naturally a citizen of
Chicago, for the spirit of enterprise which is in him and distinguishes him
finds abundant sympathy in the spirit of the great city. If there is any vir
tue which our city especially represents and stands for, it is that of active
industry and honored labor. Large and rich as it is, it is one of the few
cities in the world, and perhaps the only city in the world, where leisure
is not quite creditable. No amount of individual wealth, here in Chicago,
excuses from personal activity of some kind or other; and so thoroughly is
work and zeal in the atmosphere, that the indolent man may be born and
bred here, and yet he is out of joint with all his surroundings, and is not
in its true sense a citizen of Chicago.
"This analysis of what Chicago really is, is stranger than you may think,
and the truthfulness of the analysis, I am sure, is recognized the instant it
is stated. But Chicago has achieved something more, and I think, worthier,
than its great material growth. It has, as a city, made a magnificent char
acter for sterling and masculine probity.
73O LIFE OF EMERY A. STORRS.
"Under a necessity which seemed imperative, it was deemed wise to
issue, many years since, several millions of dollars of what were called
certificates of indebtedness, and these certificates passed into the hands of
innocent holders for value. Subsequently the courts declared these certifi
cates absolutely illegal and void. The courts declared that there was no
binding obligation upon the city of Chicago to recognize or pay them.
These evidences of indebtedness bound nothing but the honor of Chicago ;
but that was enough; and forthwith every municipal expenditure was
retrenched, all municipal salaries reduced, and with an accord substantially
unanimous, the people of Chicago proceeded to pay, long before its maturity,
in order that there might be no stain upon its good name, this indebtedness
which bound nothing but its honor. No city ever made a finer record for
itself than this ; and I insist that history shall preserve this record as among
the proudest and worthiest of its achievements.
" The night might be spent in recounting such worthy deeds. Assuredly,
it would be a shame and a dishonor, should the records of the city not be
kept, and should the materials out of which its history may be written in
the future, fail to be preserved. Assuredly, it would be a shame and a
dishonor if this marvelous growth which I have thus hastily outlined took
no higher form than that of bloated commercial and business growth.
Assuredly, it would be unworthy of the spirit of historical Chicago, that
it should have nothing to show for the future but piles of boxes and
bales, nothing but vast granaries of wheat, and lowing herds, or countless
droves of swine. Assuredly, the real Chicago of which we are proud,
means to have some other story to take down to the future. It will omit
none of these ; but it does mean that out of this marvelous physical growth
and prosperity there shall be developed a culture as splendid and as great
as the material prosperity which has made that culture possible.
"The custodian for all these priceless treasures of this worthy history is
the Historical Society of Chicago ; and when I tell you how it began,
how strugglingly it has grown, and how bravely it has maintained itself
against disasters that would have dismayed ordinary men, when I put
this society by the side of great achievements dedicated to trade and
commerce, I think that we will be agreed, all of us, that Chicago, in
what it has done for the preservation and perpetuation of its history, has
not worthily acted up to the standard of its real character and greatness.
"The Historical Society was organized in the year 1856, its purpose
being to collect and preserve all matters of historical interest, not only with
reference to the city of Chicago, but the entire North-west. There has been
no name prominently connected or identified with the Historical Society,
from its commencement down to to-day, that is not, itself, so far, at least,
as Chicago and the North-west are concerned, an honored and historic
name. Its first president was William H. Brown.
"Walter L. Newberry, Edwin H. Sheldon, and Isaac N. Arnold, have
been presidents from time to time of the Historical Society : William B.
Ogden, Mark Skinner, Thomas Hoyne, John Wentworth, and scores of
other good citizens have been prominently connected with it. Every name
HISTORICAL CHICAGO. 731
has its history of honest achievements, and every name is intimately inter
woven with the history of Chicago.
"In 1868, the Historical Society was on the high road to, as it seemed
to be, a great prosperity. It had erected a building, modest in its charac
ter, entirely unpretentious, but which was commensurate, it was deemed,
with its then present wants.
"The honored Presiden^ of this magnificent meeting (whose name has
been mentioned with distinction by England's most famous writer and his
torian, William H. Lecky,) delivered an address on the occasion of the
opening of that new hall, in which he briefly and modestly recited the birth
and the growth up to that time of the Historical Society of Chicago. He
boasted then, as much as he ever boasts of anything, that in 1868 Chicago
had a population of 300,000, and the showing which he made of the liter
ary and historical treasures of the society at that time was indeed most
gratifying. It then had over 15,000 bound volumes, over 1,700 files of
newspapers, nearly 5,000 manuscripts, 1,200 maps and charts, and also, in
connection with it, the famous Healy gallery of paintings and portraits.
Its buildings and grounds at that time had cost about $6o,coo. The library
in the language of Mr. Arnold, was ' nearly complete in the documents
and publications of the United States Government in every department,'
from its organization down to that time. The value of this collection was
incalculable. All this has been swept away.
"The new building was completed in 1867. At that time there were
703 bound volumes, and 834 unbound volumes and pamphlets in the
library. The society has at present over 30,000 volumes — historical,
statistical, and biographical. And this, in brief, marks the present con
dition of the society.
"Everything with the society went on prosperingly until the great fire
came, and all these invaluable treasures were destroyed. Here and there,
mere historic fragments were regathered. They were furnished a tempor
ary home through the munificence and liberality of Mr. Scammon. The
society had again started on its way, and in 1874 was again destroyed
by fire. This second calamity would have dismayed and discouraged
most men, but the promoters and the friends of the Historical Society of
Chicago were too thoroughly imbued with the spirit of the great city to
be at all discouraged. And so they went on, laboring under a load of
debt, struggling against all sorts of adversities, but struggling wisely and
bravely, until they finally succeeded, through the private munificence of
some gentlemen connected with that worthy institution, in rearing the^
present building, which cost the munificent sum of about $26,000. But
a few days since, by private contributions, every dollar of indebtedness
of the Chicago Historical Society was lifted from its shoulders, and there
it is to-day, with its present treasures invaluable, full of fresh energy,
and capable of splendid achievements in the future.
"But, fellow citizens, we who are not and have never been members
of the Historical Society, are we not a little ashamed of it, that in this
city, with its palatial places of business, with its magnificent homes, with
732 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
the roar of its traffic, the profits of which run up into the millions, the
temple in which the records of our achievements up to to-day and for
the future are te be preserved, has not involved an expenditure equal
to that of the ornamentation and furnishing of a first-class saloon ? Is
there any citizen of Chicago proud of it, who does not feel a certain
sense of self-reproach that these millions of wealth, and this enterprise
which braves the dangers of all climates, and, which encounters without
reluctance all difficulties, should suffer the records of its own achieve
ments to be thus tucked into an obscure corner, to be the sport of every
accident and of every wind that blows? Do we not feel that the time
has come when there should be some fitting memorial, in no way con
nected with trade, in no way associated with commerce, which shall not
be touched by the spirit of profit or dividend — a memorial coming from
the hearts of this great people, sufficiently splendid in its character and
worthy in its purpose to mark the gratitude of our hearts for the chari
ties of the world which we have received? And what more fitting
memorial could possibly be reared than a building, strong and enduring,
complete in every appointment, in which all the records of this great
city, and of the great North-western empire which has made it, should
be gathered and preserved ? What worthier memorial than that such a
building should at once be reared, where a great library might be
gathered, where all the records of our great war, and the part which
the North-west so honorably took in it, should be sacredly garnered and
preserved — where the history of every worthy citizen should be recorded,
and where each step of the marvelous growth which the city of Chicago
made should leave its., impress, so that all the future might forever be
able to mark and distinguish it?
" The general purpose of the society cannot be better set forth than in
the brief statement in its charter : which recites in forceful language that,
" ' It is conducive to the public good of a State to encourage such insti
tutions as have for their object to collect and preserve the memorials
of its founders and benefactors as well as the historical evidences of
its progress in settlement and population, and in the arts, improve
ments, and institutions which distinguish a civilized community, and to trans
mit the same 'for the 'instruction and benefit of future generations.'
"We are 'citizens of no mean city,' and it is inconceivable that an
appeal to us in furtherance of purposes so worthy as these should pass
unheeded. No man who has led a useful life or achieved anything wor
thy of remembrance can lack that proper regard for the good opinion of
those who are to come after him, which would inspire him with a desire
to have the record of his life preserved and its story fittingly told. A
city which does not care to have its records preserved, you may rest
assured, has made no record worthy of preservation.
"The Chicago Historical Society, for the first time in its long and
honorable career, appeals to this great and generous public to ,aid it in
establishing itself upon a broad and permanent basis, and to erect such
a building as \\;11 be suitable for its uses, and worthy of this city and
HISTORICAL CHICAGO. 733
of this people. We can afford to stop long enough in the rush of our
daily life to listen to and appreciate this appeal. The society has at its
disposal a fund known as the Gilpin fund, which now amounts to over
548,000. By the provisions of Mr. Gilpin' s will, the income accumulated
after ten years is devoted to the erection of a fire-proof library build
ing, to be a part of a fire-proof edifice of said society when one shall
be erected, to be in itself fire-proof, entirely Distinct from any other
portion of said edifice, though connected with it and forming a part of
it, and to be designated the Gilpin Library of the Historical Society of
Chicago. A portion of this income will become available for building
purposes in 1884. The time has come when Chicago must in this direction
do something worthy of itself. We can no longer plead infancy nor lack
of means. We must not forget that a city may have a trade so extended
that its fibers shall interlace the fate of kingdoms, and yet not be great.
What seems to be prosperity is not always prosperous. What seems to be
very great is sometimes very small and very mean. Business is not the
chief end of man ; nor does successful trade constitute the sum of human
existence. The wonders of London are not its great business houses ; more
visitors throng Westminster Abbey, where lie buried the great of England's
history, than its bank, where the wealth of the world and all the power
of that wealth are found. The humble home in the quiet village where
Shakespeare was bdrn is a Mecca to hundreds of thousands, and the name
Stratford-on-Avon is known wherever the English language is spoken or
human genius finds a worshiper. The friezes of the Parthenon are still
preserved to tell the story of the glory of Athens, but the dust and ashes
of more than 1,500 years have buried from human observation all that
ever was of its trade and commerce.
"It is time that we should pause long enough to make the inquiry
whether our growth has been a well rounded, well proportioned growth
and development ; whether it has not been excessively in one direction,
and that , not the noblest nor the best direction. What, to represent the
intellectual and artistic progress and advancement of Chicago, have we
to place beside our enormous elevators and warehouses, our stock
yards, our packing houses, our great wholesale houses and places of
business, our splendid private residences ? Our poverty in this direction
becomes painfully manifest the moment we undertake to answer this
question ; for the answer must be — nothing. Our Public Library is in the
upper stories of a business block, far from being fire-proof. The
Academy of Sciences struggles painfully along, and leads a chilled and
neglected life, in a rented home. We have practically no public Art
Gallery. Our University, uncompleted, has struggled along through mani
fold difficulties, and barely survives. We have no great school, of art
or science or music. How many in this pushing, prosperous city can
tell me where the building of the Chicago Historical Society is located?
Be assured that we shall never reach the full stature of a really great
city until we have enlarged the field of our achievements, and made
Chicago not only a point from which grain and cattle and lumber and
734 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
merchandise shall be distributed over half a continent, but also a center
from which the light of a pure, intellectual and moral civilization and
culture shall be disseminated.
"Our history, brief as it is, is studded with splendid events; but the
melancholy truth is that even these are, for the lack of permanent
preservation, fast passing into mere tradition.
"Let me turn back the page of our history twenty-two years. In those
long ago days — long ago for this young city — a boy, fired with military
ardor and inspired with the genius of military drill and organization,
gathered together a few young men, and day after day, week after week,
month after month, drilled them upon the lake shore, and finally we
began to hear of Ellsworth's Zouaves. Almost unnoticed, even at home,
this small military organization at once achieved a fame, which became
world wide, and carried the name of Chicago with it. I recall with
pride the triumphal tour which they made through the great cities of
the Union, the wonder and admiration which their marvelous drill and
discipline everywhere excited; and who that lived in Chicago at that time
can ever forget the pride with which they were received, the whole city
turning out to meet them on their return? At their head marched John
Wentworth, a fitting representative of the young and tremendously energetic
city. I think the proudest and the happiest man I ever saw was John
Wentworth that night, and well he might be proud and happy. The city
whose honor and whose good name he held as dearly as his own had
achieved fresh laurels through the zeal and energy of her comparatively
unknown boys. To the famous wigwam they marched, where thousands
had gathered to greet and welcome them, and they were received and wel
comed as they deserved to be received and welcomed, and as the large-
hearted citizens of Chicago knew so well how to receive and welcome her
sons who had reflected honor upon her. Very soon was this famous organ
ization to pass into history. Its officers and its privates were found on all
the great battle-fields of the rebellion, and the military spirit which it kind
led spread through the whole North. Its boy organizer died very young, at
the threshhold of the rebellion, one of the first to die for his country. Col
onel Scott nobly fell in the same great cause, and many others offered their
lives for their imperiled country.
"One would suppose that a record so glorious Chicago would carefully
gather and sacredly preserve. But where is the record ? But a few days
since Colonel Knox, one of the old Ellsworth Zouaves, brought to my
office a scrap-book filled with the records of the Zouaves, the accounts
published in the papers of the various cities through which they passed
on their famous trip, and a history of the organization itself. In my esti
mate such material is priceless in its value. But where shall we preserve
it ? The proper custodian is the Chicago Historical Society ; but it must
have such a home that its treasures may be surely preserved from harm ;
and when such a home is furnished, as it will be, there will flow to it
naturally every fragment of history from which the completed storv of Chi
cago and the North-west may be told.
HISTORICAL CHICAGO. 735
"Surely, one of the grandest events in our history was President Lincoln's
Proclamation of Emancipation. The original document came into the hands
of Mr. Arnold, and was by him deposited with the Historical Society.
Who now would undertake to estimate the value of that document? But
in the great fire it was destroyed.
" In connection with this great dccument, I recall another historic event
in the annals of our city. We will remember how the minds of men were
divided concerning the wisdom of the proclamation. Brave words must at
once be spoken. The hands of the President must be strengthened. The
legality and wisdom of that great measure must be made clear. A meet
ing was at once called at Bryan Hall, and such a gathering Chicago had
rarely seen. Resolutions were prepared, setting forth the necessity for the
proclamation, the authority of the President to issue it, and the reasons in
support of it. These resolutions, adopted by that meeting, struck the key
note for the entire North-west and furnished the foundation upon which argu
ments in its support were based. I believe that we owe it to ourselves to
preserve the records of that splendid meeting of Chicago's best men and
women ; and when the new building is completed, I will place among the
treasures of the Historical Society of Chicago that record.
" No city in the country achieved a more honorable distinction for
patriotic and practical devotion to the cause of the Union during the
war than the city of Chicago ; and recalling those stirring periods to my mind
and to yours, the Union Defense Committee, organized from among our
best citizens, occupies and should occupy in history a most distinguished
and honorable prominence. This large committee of practical, patriotic, and
zealous men entered with an enthusiasm into the National cause which was
felt throughout the whole country. It organized a system for the filling up
and recruiting of our armies, for the procuring of arms, for furnishing sup
plies to soldiers in the field, for encouraging and sustaining those who
remained at home, and gave the President such assurances as he could not
fail to appreciate and understand, that among the great body of the citizens
of Chicago the cause of the government would find at all times, and under
all circumstances, tried and trusted friends. I doubt whether the history of
that famous committee has ever been collected or put into shape. Scores
of its members are still living, active and honored citizens among us. No
one who has the honor of Chicago at heart can feel otherwise than the
necessity of rescuing from tradition the history of that great work, and sav
ing for the admiration of our children and our children's children that story
of clear-headed, high-hearted, resolute, and practical patriotism.
" In those eventful periods during the war, all distinctions of birth or
previous nationality were obliterated. The name of Colonel Mulligan
stands high upon the list of those who fell in the defence of an imperiled
country, and if any duty is sacred, it is that Chicago shall treasure his
among her honored names, and give the story of his noble and patriotic
life and death an enduring place among her annals. I cannot fail to
recall another notable event of that period. Stirred by a feeling common
to all our countrymen, the Jewish citizens of Chicago, assembled at a great
LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
meeting in Bryan Hall, and almost at the very threshold of the war,
raised and completely armed and equipped a company of their own people,
for the defense of our common country.
" But to recall and recount all the worthy achievements of Chicago during
that period would be the work, not of an evening, but of days and weeks.
Each one of us grows prouder of our city as we recount the great deeds
which it has done ; and we are all, I am sure, anxious that the record of
these deeds shall not be permitted to perish. The time will come, if the
material out of which history is wrought and poems are made is preserved,
that a history whose pages shall glisten with worthy achievements, and the
poem which shall recount heroic exploits, shall be written, telling what
historic Chicago was.
"The brave spirit of Chicago during the war had not left us in 1871. I
can never forget how, as we sat in the ashes and desolation of the city,
resolute, noble men gathered where shelter could be found, even among
smoking ruins, and proceeded to the- business of the hour, and to the
maturing of some scheme by which Chicago might be rebuilt. All the
records of our courts had been destroyed ; the evidences of title to property
had been swept away. To a less sturdy and less practical community the con
dition of things would have seemed like anarchy. But there was no rioting in
our streets. From the first moment the work of reconstruction began, liberal
schemes were devised by which the machinery of the courts was at once
set to work ; foundations were laid for the restoration of our titles, and so
wisely was this great work done that, looking back upon it, we can hardly
perceive that there was a jar in the general current of those affairs. This
history must be preserved. It is not only due to ourselves, but to the
future, that it should be preserved. It is but common propriety that a
people who have achieved so nobly and so largely should, when fortune
has smiled upon them as she has smiled upon Chicago, when prosperity-
has been enthroned above all its business, remember not only itself but
the future to come after it, which has the right to know that history, and
take hope and courage from it.
"However much Chicago may have failed to perform the full measure
of her duties in the cultivation and encouragement of literature and the arts,
she has not failed in her charities. For charity's sake, Chicago was never
appealed to in vain. Her hospitals, public and private, are an honor not
only to the city but to human nature ; and if the story of what Chicago has
done to relieve the poor, the needy, and the suffering, the homeless, the
friendless, and the orphan, could be half told it would reflect a lustre
greater than was ever conferred by her proudest commercial achievement.
"Its capacity for intelligent self-government has been repeatedly demon
strated and its people never yet undertook to correct evils of municipal
government, or frauds of administration, that they did not abundantly suc
ceed. There is to-day an awakened interest in the individual responsibility
of the citizen for good government, honorable to the citizen and pointing to
results the most beneficent in the future.
"The imperial city, the youngest born of all the great cities of the world.
HISTORICAL CHICAGO. 737
is old in what it has achieved. The sunshine of success illuminates its
great enterprises,, and prosperity sits enthroned, presiding over its marts of
trade. The wildest dreams of its founders have been realized tenfold. In
its generous rivalry with older cities it has again and again crowned itself
with the wreaths of victory, and regnant like a queen, looking across the
waters of the great lake, taking the sun full in its front, our beloved city
sits, so young but so great, her brow decked with a shining crown, studded
and jeweled with noble deeds.
"As I have already said, all these events, and thousands of others, to
which I have not alluded, make the Chicago of the present. What shall
the future Chicago be? In no worthy particular, less in any respect than
the Chicago of to-day ; in many worthy particulars, infinitely greater than
the Chicago of to-day. My fellow citizens, we must remember that we are
building a city, and making for it a character, not for ourselves alone, but
for generations to tcome after us. What the Chicago of the next generation
shall be it is for the Chicago of the present generation to determine. In
what sort of city the millions who shall inhabit Chicago in the future shall
live, the 650,000 people who inhabit Chicago to-day must decide. It is for
none of us to unveil the future, nor to make the yet dumb days that are
to come speak to us ; but I think it requires no great gift of prophesy or
inspiration to unseal those closed lips and have them tell us what the future
of Chicago is to be. Into that future shall be projected all the nobility, all
the heroism, all the self-sacrificing hard work, all the zeal, all the rugged,
practical good sense of the Chicago of all the days that are past. Every
one of these good deeds speak to all the future ; every medal which recounts
a worthy achievement, every monument on whose bronze or marble case is
recorded the story of a noble life, is a message from the past to all the
future. There is not a fresco brought to light from old Pompeii, buried
i, 800 years ago, that does not speak with manifold voices to the peoples of
the nineteenth century. There is not a battered banner of the war of the
rebellion, there is not a truthful story of the worthy achievement of an old
settler of Chicago, that is not perpetual in its influence, and is not addressed,
voiceful and inspiring, even through all the centuries. We do not look far
into the future but that we hear the tramp of millions of feet coming hither-
ward to fill up and occupy the fields of the fruitful Northwest. We hear
in every breeze that blows, in the generations that are to come across the
Atlantic, the winds that bring to our shores the countless thousands of the
old world, looking for more prosperous and for freer homes. If we but
listen, we hear the tread of advancing multitudes. They come to us, and
we must be prepared to receive them. We see a great city stretching its
arms across the prairie, with its streets thronged and populous, with its
thousands and tens of thousands of contented homes, with its shops filled
with busy and prosperous artisans, with its schools giving the benefit of a
liberal and a free education to all who may desire it, its courts presided
over by wise and just judges, its business centers inspired by the highest
commercial probity, its manufacturers sending their products all round the
globe, the white sails of its commerce glistening upon every sea, its religion
47
738 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
absolutely free, its patriotism as broad as the republic ; we see it the center
of sound political thought and action ; and we shall, I am, sure, see, rising
in the presence and by the very side of warehouses and great business
structures, fitting homes for music, the drama, and all the arts. We see it
the resort, not merely of men who would trade, but we see trade itself
inspired with the loftiest purposes. The scholar, the poet, the actor, the
painter, the sculptor — all these we see in this future, and not so very far,
seeking Chicago as a chosen home, because in the great city their music,
their sculpture, their painting, are all welcomed, and all find ready and
worthy appreciation.
"The Historical Society of Chicago is not only the proper, but I speak in
no invidious sense when I say the only nucleus which we now have for this
great future. The men who have spanned continents with their enterprise
can make this society what it deserves to be, and they will make it what it
deserves to be.
"My fellow citizens, the new building is to be erected. That decision is
made beyond all power of reversal. The simple inquiry now is, Who shall
have the honor of contributing toward it? Who shall take part in this
great revival of letters, and the arts and sciences in Chicago? I answer,
every man shall take a part, and that when Chicago is appealed to for
such a purpose, and in such a cause, the response shall be as universal as
the appeal is broad, and that the response which Chicago will make will
be put up to the full measure of the merit of the cause to promote which
they are asked to contribute. And when this splendid record finally comes
to be made, not the smallest among the great events of its history will be
not only what we this night achieve, but the influence which we this night
put into active operation. Chicago is a patriotic city, but it has an intelli
gent and practical patriotism. We love our city not merely because it is
busy and populous ; we love it so well that we would not retain its blem
ishes nor encourage its faults; but we are brave enough and fair enough,
and love it well enough to remove its blemishes and correct its faults. We
shall live to see the realization of our fondest dreams and our highest hopes
for this great city. We shall live to see it the center, not only of trade,
but of the purest and highest intellectual exertion. We shall live to see
monuments of the arts, great libraries, temples where history may be pre
served all about us. And we shall live to see the day when every one who
takes part in this movement will be thankful that he ever had such an
opportunity, and when his children will thank him for what he did for the
glory of this imperial city.
"Let the new building rise, worthy of its purpose and worthy of Chicago,
on foundations strong, enduring, and it shall ere long gather within its walls
a history as proud and as worthy as was ever recorded of any city of which
historic annals furnish us a record."
EXECUTWE MANSION.
WASHINGTON
^ «-^
<^!fyu^_s ,A
CHAPTER XLII.
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1884.
SCENE AT THE CLOSING OF THE CHICAGO REPUBLICAN CONVENTION — AN
ORATORICAL ACHIEVEMENT — AN ELOQUENT SPEECH INSPIRED BY A
TUMULT — SPEECHES ELSEWHERE DURING A CAMPAIGN OF FIVE MONTHS —
BRISTLING WIT AT BOSTON, IN TREMONT TEMPLE — DEFENSE OF THE
' RIFF-RAFF OF THE WEST — OUR NATION'S SHAME — THE TARIFF QUESTION
AGAIN— RECORDS OF TWO RIVAL POLITICAL ORGANIZATIONS— DEFEAT OF
HIS PARTY, BUT FAITH IN THE FUTURE.
THE political campaign of 1884, though ending with defeat to
his party, opened with an oratorical victory for Mr. Storrs.
He had been an earnest advocate, both prior to the Republican
national convention and as a delegate during its session, for the
renomination of Chester A. Arthur whose presidential career had
reflected dignity and honor upon the party; but true to his often-
repeated expression that the will of the majority should rule in poli
tics, when Elaine and Logan had carried the convention, he did
not "sulk in camp" but at once joined in making the nomina
tion unanimous and, the very night of the decision as to who
should be the Republican standard bearers for 1884, began pub
lic work for the nominees. It was Friday night, June 6, the
great auditorium in the Exposition building, in which the con
vention had been held, had been filled by a restless crowd
assembled in the expectation of having some of the eminent
orators in attendance speak in ratification of the nominations of
the day, but the convention devoted itself to finishing the uncom
pleted routine business of the organization. Late in the evening,
certain speakers arose and attempted to make addresses, but the
now disappointed audience hissed them severally to their seats.
A motion to adjourn had been carried, and a general movement
739
74O LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
started for the doors, when a loud call was made for Robert G.
Ingersoll. He was not present; and, then, there arose a cry for
"Storrs! Storrs!" Said the Tribune t the following Sunday, "He
was fairly carried to the platform, and, without any other inspira
tion than the excitements of the moment, made an address which
will rival any of Ingersoll's brilliant efforts. It was full of sar
casm and humor, and as sparkling as a glass of champagne.
His characterization of Blaine was admirably concise and to the
point, and his arraignment of the Democracy was the most
scathing and severe — and all the more severe because it was
studded with humor and satire — that that party has ever been
called upon to face." One reference to the Democratic party
was:
"I have seen in one of their platforms that they propose to enter on
business with no capital except the purity of their principles. Was there
ever such a bankrupt concern with such a capital? They say that is all
that they have to offer for the suffrages of the people. My God ! my
friends. A man that will work on these terms will work for nothing and
board himself. Won't you think of that dear, delightful old daisy, if she
could take physical form, which we call the Democratic party, entering
into business upon the purity of her principles? She has kept a house of
political ill-fame for more than twenty years. She has entertained every
dishonest political notion and every disreputable political tramp on the con
tinent during that period of time. I think I see her marching up to the
ingenuous American citizen, with her shawl twisted around her shoulders,
with brass jewelry in her ears, out at the toes, with a drunken leer of silly
invitation in her eye, with maiden coyness ; professing to do business on
the purity of her principles. I would not for the world say anything dis
respectful of the Democratic party. There are certain things about it that
attract me ; but 1 regard it a little as I do a waterspout, which I like to
look at from a distance, but dislike to get too near to ; and when I see one
of its processions — and we will see many of them during this campaign — I
feel about them as our old friend Strode, in this State, did when he
described an experience of his own in the Black Hawk War. He said :
'By the dim light of the setting sun, on a distant eminence, I saw a hostile
band. They were gentlemen without hats; I did not know who they were,
but I knew d — d well they were no friends of mine.'"
The following description of the triumphant march of the
Republican party aroused overwhelming enthusiasm, pronounced
as it was amid convention excitement, and with all the unusual
elocutionary powers of Mr. Storrs:
"The night is closing down upon us, the old diabolism of the Demo
cratic party is not yet gone. Another convention will be held here next
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1884. 741
month. Tilden will probably be nominated. It is possible that he is
already dead, but, with the slyness and secretiveness of the author of the
cipher dispatches, he might be dead two years and never let anybody-
know it. We will run substances against shadows. We will run living,
breathing men, with bone, and flesh, and muscle, and appetite, against
ghostly reflections such as he. They tell us that he may carry New York.
New York is a great, practical, splendid business State. It was my great
good fortune to be born there. It is the old Empire State. It stands like
the angel of the Apocalypse, with one foot resting upon the sea and the
other upon the land, the mistress of both. It has the spirit of Elaine and
Logan in its bosom. The old Republicanism of that State which challenged
the diabolism of Democracy thirty years ago has still within its heart the
old undying and imperishable faith. It will carry this banner, you may
rest assured, forward through the storms and fires of the conflict upon which
» we are about to enter to triumph and to victory. There may be those who
will hesitate and falter by the roadside. There may be those who will
weary in this magnificent march. The campaign is now upon us. We
have no time for liniments or poultices. We cannot stop to heal the infirm.
The lame men must fall behind, the cripples be relegated to the rear. The
great, healthy, splendid marching of the Republican millions taking up this
banner will place it, you may be sure, upon the topmost eminences of mag
nificent victory."
He told of his love for political warfare in the words:
" Music is in all the air. I feel its old pulsings in my very veins to-night.
I know what this feels like, and I know what the awakened excitement and
enthusiasm of a great and mighty party indicate. I hear the old songs of
the old days. I see the old flag, with every star glistening like a planet,
filling all the skies. I see the old procession formed. I care not where my
place in that procession may be — whether it be up in the front, under the
light of the blessed old banner, or down near the rear — I listen to the
order * Forward,' and I march, as you will march, with your faces toward
the flag."
"Friday night," said the Chicago Times editorialy, "there was a
demonstration of the power of a bright and adroit orator over a
vast and turbulent multitude such as is rarely witnessed. All
the evening the convention had been in a state of disorder. The
regular speakers who arose to second a popular nomination were
geeted with cat-calls and yells of 'Time!' that were calculated to
disconcert anyone, and that drove one or two speakers to their
seats with their speeches unfinished. All the business of the
session was completed. A motion to adjourn sine die had been
carried, and the whole concourse was in motion toward the doors,
and two or three thousand people had left the hall. At this
time Mr. Emery Storrs was brought to the platform and commenced
742 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
to make a speech. To a large portion of the people present
he was unknown. He caught the attention of the people nearest
to him with a few words, and the outpour was checked. Some
degree of order was secured, and he went on. The throngs
manifested some interest. Presently the six or seven thousand
people in the hall, who were on their feet to go out, and most
of whom were up till 2 o'clock the previous night, and who had
been too restless to listen respectfully to the regular speakers of
the evening, sat down. For more than half an hour Mr. Storrs
went on with one of his characteristic campaign speeches, full of
apt illustrations and bright points, and the audience sat through
it with the utmost order and attention, and the only calls made
by Mr. Storrs' auditors were to 'Talk this way!' when he turned
toward the stage, and to ' Go on ! ' when he made a movement
to stop. In catching a large, disorderly, and tired crowd on the
wing, so to speak, and not only holding its attention but eliciting
cries for more, Mr. Storrs won an oratorical success that is not
often achieved."
The campaign work thus taken up, Mr. Storrs found it impossible
to push aside until the months which intervened between that
date and the day of election were passed. Elaine wrote "The
boys in Maine are crazy after you. You must come;" Jewell
urged, "There is no -use in dodging California, for they clamor
after you;" from nearly every State committee came letters and
telegrams begging for a speech. Devotion to party, love of pub
lic speaking, did the rest. Throwing aside his own interests, sacri
ficing perhaps more than any other man in the country, he
responded to every call within his power. The week following
the convention, he inaugurated the Ohio campaign by a speech
in the Music Hall of Cincinnati, amid scenes which seemed to
follow his voice all over the land. The Enquirer, an organ bitterly
opposed to Elaine, said of the meeting, " The audience, hundreds
of whom were ladies, seemed to have gone daft . . . people stood
up all over the house waving arms and flags, until from the
stage the scene presented the appearance of a vast field of grain
violently swayed by cross currents of wind. It was useless to
attempt to check the tumult." The same paper described Mr.
Storrs, after his introduction, as follows; " Mr. Storrs, dapper and
wiry, arrayed in a faultlessly fitting dress suit, stepped to the
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1884. 743
front, where with easy self-possession he waited for a cessation
of the applause before he spoke. A master of oratory, his voice,
full, deep and round, rolled out in perfect utterance, filling every
corner of the hall. It was oratory without effort. Every word,
clearly cut and distinct, was delivered with that rare quality, an
agreeable sound."
Without attempting to give the speech in full, two or three
selections will show its strength. He referred to the Republican
convention of 1884, and to its nominee, in the following words:
"A few words about that convention — in some respects the most notable
we have ever had in this country. It came straight from the body of the
people ; every Congressional district was represented ; every delegate was
responsible to his constituents. There was much less of personal bickering
than we have ever before witnessed. There was no chance for a dark
horse. We had resolved that somebody's first choice should be the choice
of the convention, and nobody complains except the followers of a distin
guished man who, upon the final test of his strength, received as a vote
less than one-twentieth of the vote of the convention. Now, gentlemen, no
complaint can be made, none has been made, none will be made, that in
the result which you are to-night ratifying there was anything else or other
than the fairest and squarest work. It is needless to inquire into causes ;
there is no mystery about it. During the war, you remember, there was a
great fight between the Atlanta and the Weehawken in Charleston Harbor.
The Atlanta went down, and our Democratic Confederate friends busied
themselves with furnishing some explanation for that disastrous result.
Somebody said that the rudder had fouled ; others said that the Captain
was drunk ; others said that the water *vas too deep ; others said that the water
was too shallow ; and by and by some plain matter-of-fact man announced
in his explanation (possibly political conventions suggested that) that possibly
a three hundred pound solid shot that went straight through the sides of
the Atlanta, fired from the Weehawken, might have something to do with
the sinking of the ship.
"So was Blaine nominated, simply because for reasons satisfactory to
themselves the people of this country had so willed it, and there was no
avoiding the result, and we are in the field with him this day. What are
we going to do about it:* First now, gentlemen, who are we going to beat
in the way of parties? The same old party unanimously, solidly, unqualifi
edly, indescribably, universally, all the time, every time, and under all cir
cumstances, for thirty years infernal, develish."
Upon the subject of our navy, he said what every thinking
citizen must sometime endorse:
"The history of James G. Blaine is known. Slander has done its worst
with him. This is, and will be, no defensive campaign, and the tattoos
which we see upon him are inscripfons of splendid achievements, placed
7/]/| LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
there by an admiring people, who have lifted him away above the slanders
and detractions of his enemies, and placed him in the most commanding
position of the nation which he has done so much to honor. The brokers
of Wall street are afraid of Mr. Elaine's foreign policy; with shuddering
fear, with quivering lips and with trembling hand mention a foreign policy
and they instantly hie to their fortifications and their earthworks. What
kind of a foreign policy is it ? \Vhat kind of a foreign policy does our plat
form demand? What kind of a foreign policy do you require? W7hat kind
of a foreign policy do the wants, the emergencies and necessities of the
nation imperatively exact? We are not respected abroad. I say we should
be. We are not respected at home. I say this should not be. I want no
war; I want only the summer days of prosperous peace. I know of but
one way to secure it, and that is promptly and at once to place ourselves
in such a position that all assault can be so readily resented that none
will ever be made. Without a navy, the sport of every foreign power,
with an inadequate coast defense, the sport of every foreign power, we
invite assault. We stand, a great, big, sturdy nation, with our hands help
lessly by our sides, utterly unable, not only to protect our interests elsewhere
in the world, but utterly unable to defend ourselves at home.
"The condition is one of shame, indignity and outrage upon ourselves
that every spirited American will see is at once corrected. I want some
thing more than this. Now I am speaking merely for myself: I am bind
ing nobody. The time has come when the old notion of our insularity and
freedom from attacks by foreign powers must cease. We are to-day six
days from Europe ; nearer, much nearer, than Cincinnati was to New York
fifty years ago. We have trade with every port ; we have our products in
every civilized land beneath the sun. Our commercial interests are extant
everywhere ; our citizens are all over the globe. There is not a gun-boat
over which the flag of the great nation floats, adequate to protect an insulted
American in the meanest seaport of the smallest nation of the earth. We
are interested in what is going on all over the world. Our trade must be
protected and cared for wherever it extends. That nation is unfit to be
called a Nation which will not defend the imperiled rights of its citizens at
home and abroad whenever they are assailed. I give to my country allegi
ance ; I recognize its laws; I obey loyally and willingly in all cases w^hen
obedience is required ; I pay that for protection, and when my Government
fails to give it to me, it is my right to take their Constitution in my hand
and say: 'You blundering, bullying, bragging, non-performing fraud of a
Government, protect me as you have agreed to do or quit business.'"
Perhaps nowhere, during this long campaign, which was
destined to be the last for his participation, was Mr. Storrs more
characteristically witty, nor did he better demonstrate his stump-
speaking powers, than at Boston, the night of September 9th.
The gathering was at Tremont Temple. The Hon. George S.
Boutwell in introducing him, said "He is known as an eminent
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1884. 745
lawyer, a sound Republican, and in politics a terror to evil doers.'
The address is appended as reported in the Boston Herald, of
September loth, 1884, with all the parentheses and interrogations
as in that journal noted, in order that some idea may be con
veyed of the effect of those rare powers of expression and mimicry
which Mr. Storrs possessed. The report ran :
"Mr. President, Fellow-Citizens, Ladies and Gentlemen — At this hour of
the night, it would be presumptuous for me to make anything like a full
and elaborate discussion of the principles involved in the pending presiden
tial campaign. It Seems to me, since I have read the papers of this morn
ing, that the necessity for very much discussion is past, and that political
oratory has resolved itself, after all, pretty much into a howl of wild delight
on one side, and wailing lamentations on the other, with an occasional
bleak, dismal whistle coming from the brush or from some obscure place
intended, no doubt, to keep up the courage of the whistler. I am not
unmindful, fellow-citizens, whom I am addressing. [Applause.] I know I
am in Boston, in the state of Massachusetts, in the New England states.
I am a resident of the state of Illinois. I am a citizen of the United
States. [Applause.] I am, with you, joint proprietor of Bunker Hill
[applause], made so by the I4th and I5th constitutional amendments.
[Cheers and applause.] I have a common interest in Paul Revere [cheers],
and in that remarkable cargo of tea, the unshipping of which led to such
splendid results a good many years ago. I am from what in New York
has been characterized the 'rowdy West' [renewed applause] — what one,
at least, of New England's famous clergymen has denominated as the
'riff raff of the West.' [Cheers and laughter.] May I say to you,
because I know it will be soothing [laughter], that this characterization,
Mr. Chairman, has not greatly disturbed us in the West. [Applause.] It
has not broken our rest; not disturbed our slumbers [cheers], nor interfered
with the quiet and usual transactions of our business. [Renewed applause.]
Now, as Senator Hawley will tell you, we don't lack spirit on a proper
occasion. We have an abundance of it. [Cheers.]
"Our state was the only state in the Union, Mr. Chairman, that filled its
quota without a draft. [Renewed cheers and applause.] We sent over
about 18,000 more to Missouri, a strong Democratic state, which will cast
its electoral vote for Cleveland. We give 40,000 Republican majority. [Tre
mendous applause and cheers.] We have not been made angry by this
characterization. May I tell you why? [A voice, 'Yes tell us.'] We are
the sons and daughters of New England. [Cheers and applause.] We
have left these old fields and farms, and the blessed old firesides in New-
York and New England, many of us, with nothing save the lessons of
splendid thrift and frugality which we have learned in these old New Eng
land homes. A thousand miles or more separate us from those old fire
sides. Our heartstrings may have been stretched ; they have not been
broken. [Cheers and applause.] And we have built in the valley of the
746 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORRS.
Mississippi the most colossal, the most splendid empire of free men, free
thought, free speech, as splendid a government as the sun in all his course
has ever shone upon. [Renewed applause,] It does not make much differ
ence what preacher calls us the riff raff. The sons and daughters of New
England propose to turn over the settlement of the whole question to their
fathers and mothers in New England. They will settle that question.
[Cheers.] Well, fellow-citizens, there is no man living in the West that is
not gratified to speak in Boston. [Applause.] And, if any man living in
the West pretends to say he does not like to speak here in Boston, he is
guilty of wilful and deliberate hyperbole. [Laughter.] We are citizens of
a common country, united in our interests. We are becoming in the West
great manufacturers. We are proud of this country, as you are proud of
it. [Cheers.] W7e give Republican majorities, as you give Republican
majorities, and for the same reason.
"We believe that the glory and the honor of the American name are
bound up in the success of this Republican party. [Cheers.] I started with
that great party when I was a boy. The first ballot I ever cast was for
John C. Fremont, many, many years ago. [Cheers.] I look back upon
hat time and that standard bearer, and it looks all bright and radiant,
shining with the glory of the birth of a new party — A party which contains
within its ranks the best thought and the loftiest sentiment and the most
exalted conscience of our people. [Loud applause.] I have been with that
party as an humble follower, a private in its ranks, never giving orders
myself, but always, as near as I could be, under the folds of that starry,
blessed, old banner [cheers], taking directions from our magnificent leaders,
Lincoln [cheers,] and Grant, and Hayes, and Garfield [cheers], and Arthur,
and Blaine. [Loud applause.] And, fellow-citizens, it makes very little
difference to me where in that splendid procession of the millions of the
inhabitants of this country I may be placed, whether I am up near the
standard bearer under the stars, or down near the foot of the procession.
I march to the old music, Mr. Chairman, and it is the music of the Union.
My heart beats my own time. [Applause.] I am certain of one thing —
that I shall always, so long as I live, march with my face toward the flag.
[Tremendous applause and cheers.] I am not an independent in politics.
[Cheers.] I recognize no purgatorial politics [cheers and laughter], no halt
ing, half-way station between heaven and hell. [Laughter and cheers.] To
me it is the heaven of good Republican government, or it is the hell of that
diabolical, old, infernal party [prolonged laughter and cheers] that has
never in all its long, consistent, bad, criminal career, done a right thing
except at the wrong time. [Laughter.]
" I wish to say of the Democratic party nothing unkind [cheers], nothing
ungentlemanly. [Laughter and applause.] Of the independents it is my
purpose to speak in terms of the utmost tenderness. [Laughter.] They
have left us. Why should we mourn departed friends? [Laughter.] When
I read the announcement a few days ago, Mr. Chairman, that they had
gone [laughter], I heard the news with a great deal of solid comfort [laugh
ter and cheers] — a great deal of resignation. But when I read along a lit-
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1884. 747
tie further, and found that their absence was to be only temporary, that
they intended some day to return, I confess — \vho should not confess it? —
that my mind was filled with direst apprehension. [Cheers and laughter.]
Our party has made some mistakes. If you will allow me to make a sug
gestion, it has grown too rapidly at the top. [Cheers and applause.] I,
for one, am prepared to exchange the political aesthetes for the horny-
handed, hard-fisted, workingmen. [Applause.] My feelings have been lac
erated, my heart has been wrung many times by the departure of the aes
thetes. [Laughter.] They have played too many farewell engagements.
[Cheers.] I recognize the first rule of private hospitality in their treatment
— I 'welcome the coming and speed the parting guest.' [Tremendous
applause and laughter.] We have heard in the West something about the
better element of the party. [Cheers.] In our plain way — because we
have been building up states, cities and empires — we have not had time to
think much about the matter.
"We have always thought, however, that the better element was the
biggest [cheers], and that the wisdom of this great party of ours was in
the majority. Now don't you think so? [A voice, "Yes," and applause.]
Every time I have read an announcement in the West (we take the Atlan
tic Monthly there and have gospel privileges). [Laughter and cheers] I
have read that these gentlemen are exceedingly solicitous as concerning the
question of the purity of our youth. [Laughter.] May I be permitted to
suggest, Senator (turning to General Hawley), and I wish you would tell
them so in Connecticut, the farmers of* Illinois, of the great West, those
strong, splendid broad-browed, great, big hearted men, those men who
buried the nasty doctrine of fiat money under a majority of 40,000, those
men are quite capable themselves of taking care of the morals of their sons.
[Cheers.] At least they don't propose to turn the custody of those morals
over to an assorted lot of gentlemen, one half of whom deny the existence
of a God and the other half of whom believe that mankind, themselves
included, developed from an ape. Now, just what does it mean to be an
independent in politics? If the word has a practical significance at all, it
means the refusal to acknowledge allegiance to either of the great political
parties of the country; is not that so? [A voice, "Yes," and cheers.]
These gentlemen are simply independent of the Republican party, to which
they formerly belonged — spasmodically, occasionally belonged. [Laughter.]
They have attached themselves to the Democratic party. They are not
independent of that, are they, when they acknowledge allegiance to. it?
How absurd it is! [Applause.] If a refusal to vote the Republican ticket,
to indorse Republican doctrines, to support Republican candidates is an
evidence of independence, then the Democrat is a great deal more inde
pendent, because he in that regard has been at it a great deal longer.
[Cheers and applause.]
"Will some astute logician tell me the difference between a genuine old-
fashioned Democrat and the new article, the independents? [Cheers and
applause]. They support the same men, and for the same reasons. The
old Democrat and his ally support Grover Cleveland because of his high
LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
moral character. [Applause and cheers.] Mr. Chairman [turning to the
chairman], I cannot understand what that last applause was for. They
support him because he vetoed the five-cent fare bill, he vetoed the bill
shortening the hours of labor for street car conductors and drivers, and
because he vetoed the mechanics' lien law in the state of New York. Now
the old Democrat and independent both support him for those reasons,
among others. Now, they refuse to support Mr. Elaine for the same reasons
exactly. There is no difference whatever. Mr. Curtis and Mr. Schurz both
withhold their support from Mr. Elaine for the same reasons that Hubert O.
Thompson and Mr. Davidson withhold theirs. They use the same methods,
work through the same channels and seek to accomplish the same end in
exactly the same way. Eoth mourn when they are defeated, and rejoice
when they succeed, and both will be buried in the same common grave.
[Applause and cheers.] When they are dead and their skeletons are
bleached, you cannot tell the skeleton of an independent from that of a
Democrat. [Applause and cheers.] This is a very extraordinary party
of ours, the Republican party. It never, in all its long, splendid and illus
trious career, has allowed a leader to take it one single step in any direc
tion it did not want to go. [A voice: 'That's so,' and applause.] Never.
I want you to think of that. [Renewed applause.] Our leaders have some
times left us by wholesale. So much the worse for the leaders, and so
much the better for the party.
" In 1872, Governors, ex-Governors, senators, and ex-senators, judges and
ex-judges left us, because the party, as they said, was corrupt. And yet,
how that splendid old ship did righten itself up after they had gotten off!
[Laughter and applause.] How magnificently it made for the harbor of a
splendid success! How desolate and discomfited have been the leaders
who jumped overboard ever since? [Applause and laughter.] There is
another very remarkable feature about our party, which quite distinguishes
it from the Democratic party. To write a platform for the Democratic
party requires the very highest degree of rhetorical and literary ability. I
think I possess some ability of that kind myself [laughter], and I would
not try it under any circumstances. [Applause and cheers.] On the other
hand, there is not a Republican in all the 55,000,000 of people upon this
continent that cannot write a Republican platform that is not good Republi
can doctrine everywhere. Gentlemen, did you ever think what would hap
pen to a Democratic orator if he put his platform in his pocket at night
and got on a train which landed him in a direction that he did not sup
pose he was going. Suppose, for instance, he started from Chicago and
was going to Boston, and by some curious freak was landed at Atlanta or
Savannah, and, thinking he was in Boston ail the time, began to clamor
for a free ballot and a fair count. [Laughter and applause.] So you see
that it is a thing which is liable to spoil with a change of weather.
[Cheers.] Suppose that a patriotic Democrat, and there are many such,
construing the platform, after days and nights of anxious, hair-pulling head
ache, has made up his mind as to what it means on the subject of the
tariff, and he starts off on a trip, and lands at Lancaster, Pa., and there
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1 884. 749
begins to talk about a platform for free trade. What kind of a funeral
awaits that man? [Cheers and applause.] So you see that it is full of
difficulties. They say we are all the time talking about our record. 'I hey
decline to talk about theirs, and I don't blame them. [Cheers and laughter.]
In the few words that I shall have occasion to say to you about the Dem
ocratic party, remember that I treat of it as a party. I make a distinction
between the party and the member of the party, the same as I would
between a corporation and a stockholder of a corporation.
"For instance, I know stockholders of the Standard Oil Company, and
they are excellent gentlemen, but the company , [Laughter.] I know
Democrats who are a great deal better than their party, but I never kne\v any
one worse. [Cheers and laughter.] And so it is about their party I would
like to talk. And it is the party to which the conscientious independent
citizens have attached themselves. Let me say here, it is a party that has
shown how potent the silent vote is in Maine [Laughter] and in Vermont.
But we are told, when we speak about the record of the Republican party,
that we are discussing old issues. To be sure, that is very bad, but it is
no objection, gentlemen, to an issue that it is old, if that issue has not been
settled. [Cheers.] The preachers of the gospel for a great many hundreds
of years have been denouncing sin. That is a very old issue, and yet I
suppose they will keep up their denunciations until sin quits. [Laughter.]
The people of this country want to have confidence in any party to which
they propose to intrust the interests of the country. The people of this
country, let me say, are pretty intelligent and observing. It is not enough
for them to know that a promise is made. What they are after is that the
promise shall be kept, and they have to depend for such information upon
the history of the individual or party to which they propose to intrust such
interest. Now, is not that the best kind of sense? If a* party promises to
uphold the public credit, that party always having undertaken to destroy it,
will you take such a promise? If it promises to protect and care for our
American industries, when for 30 years it has sought to paralyze and destroy
them, will you accept such a promise? [A voice — "No."] Of course you
won't. If it professes and promises to take care of our financial interests,
while it has for years sought to destroy them, will you accept such promises?
I take it not.
"These are fair, square questions, which every one is going to ask for
himself, and to which he insists upon an answer. What is the record of
that old party? If this hall was filled with Democrats, and every one of
them solid in the faith and firm in the belief, I could clear the hall in
three minutes by reading from the platform of 1868 and 1872. They have
never made a promise in which the interest of the country has been invol
ved that they have kept. [Cheers.] There has been no great measure of
public utility that the party has ever favored in all its career of 30 years,
and there is no good measure that party has not opposed during that time.
[Loud applause.] Is there any one in this large and splendid audience, in
this old and splendid city of Boston, memorable for its history and sanc
tified in the hearts of the people by the recollection of the revolution; is
75O LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
there one of you, glorying in the greatness of our country in the past, and
with the hope and promise of the future ; is there one of you who can
point to anything in the last quarter of a century that the Democratic party
has done, or attempted to do from which you draw any pride, or from
which the country would have drawn any honor? Can you point to any
great event in history which makes up our patrimony and heritage that
it has not opposed? [Loud applause.] That is a dreadful question, and
a dreadful fact. Is there any one such instance? The Republican party,
whose advocate in a simple way I am, has never made any great prom
ises it has not religiously performed. [Applause.] The promise of to-day
is the statute of to-morrow, and ripens into the fundamental law of the land.
In its brief career of twenty-five years, it has counted by its achieve
ments 1000 years of the grandest history. [Cheers.] It made our terri
tories all free, and elected Lincoln. [Great applause.] By one supreme
effort, it lifted 4,000,000 people from the position of African cattle to that of
American citizenship. [Applause.] It placed this great country in the midst
of prosperity unexampled in the world. [Cheers.]
"Gentlemen, I can never tire of speaking of the achievements, or the non-
achievements of the Democratic party. I make one honorable exception.
Governor Hoadly of Ohio visited Maine, where he spoke. He was at one
time a Republican, and, finding the need of a record, he furnished one to
his friends there. He story he told was like the old news from the Po
tomac — 'Important if true.' [Loud laughter.] There is no one here who
will mention what I am about to say. [Laughter.] Did you ever see a
washed-out Republican that had fallen into the Democratic party that ever
bragged about being a Democrat? [Renewed laughter.] He is always
proclaiming that he has been something better — a Republican ; that he had
seen better days, like some of the gentlemen in the old states [laughter and
applause], a little ravelled out at the edge, and run down at the heel, but
with here and there marks to show that originally the goods were valuable.
[General laughter and applause.] He was an abolitionist, he says, when
Logan was voting the Democratic ticket. There is the place where the
Democrats and their allies agree. [Applause.] It is astonishing that they
speak about Logan voting the Democratic ticket. Hendricks voted that
ticket once. [Laughter.] But is it, after all, the real question when a man
began to be an .apostle half as much as how long he holds out?
[Laughter and applause.] Who began first? Judas or Saul of Tarsus?
Judas, I think. But think about him running around in that Democratic
region of his, jingling those 30 pieces of silver he got from the Demo
cratic committee of that day as his price for his joining the party of
purity and reform, and claiming that he was a Christian long before the
scales fell from the eyes of Saul of Tarsus. [Vociferous applause and
laughter.] Logan did vote the Democratic ticket, but the first shot at
Fort Sumter drove from him every spark of the Democratic faith, and
in the flame and thunder of battle he made himself the peerless soldier
of the war for the Union. [Renewed applause.] Take from the history
of the country for the last 25 years the solid achievements of John A.
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1884. 751
Logan, and you make a chasm [applause] ; but take from the same time
the achievements of his detractors, and there is no abrasion on the su**
face. [Renewed applause].
"The hour is so late, however — [Voice — "Go on."] I am willing to go
on. [Loud applause.] I was about to say the hour is so late, it seems to be
an outrage on the understanding of so fine an audience. But let's be fair
about it. The night is hot, and while you suffer in listening, I suffer in
talking, and so, in the good, old-fashioned way, let us bear one another's
burdens. [Applause.] The life of man is limited to about seventy years, and
you cannot expect me to spend all of it in going into the crimes and follies
of the Democratic party. [Laughter and applause.] It seems to me a
waste of time and timber. I was reading the Chicago Tribune the other
day, and I saw a missionary had been sent from Boston to Chicago to
organize the independent movement, which is a kind of ' go-as-you-please '
affair, and requires a good deal of nursing. [Laughter.] There was a grand
rally, and the whole five were present, some with Mr. Gladstone's last
speeches, others with essays from the Cobden Club, others carrying their
canes in the middle, and" all appearing like three-story-and-mansard-roof
patriots. [Laughter.] They were at the Palmer House, and one said Mas
sachusetts was going to give Cleveland an overwhelming majority. He
was an independent, and one of the better class of that party. [Laughter.]
Of course, the statement was not false, was it? Not an extreme economy
of the truth? [Laughter.] I have to be a little delicate about my language.
• ' I have been somewhat dazed at what seems to be the revolving and
somewhat contradictory position the independent movement has taken. It is
like the trip of the blind ass in a park. Very much walking and very
little getting ahead. [Laughter.] They say to the Democrats: 'I will
support your candidate on moral considerations alone. [Laughter.] I
will vote your ticket ; I will march under your banner ; wear your uni
form ; take orders from your leaders ; I will discharge my guns into the
faces of my own friends from your ranks, but I must not be considered
of you. I still claim the privilege of attending the councils of the army
I have just deserted [loud applause] as well as yours, and, while I explode
my batteries in the breasts of my old friends, I will, with a magnanimity
the like of which was never recorded in history, consent to draw rations
from both armies.' [Loud laughter and applause.] The independent move
ment may have a basis somewhere. Can you see it? In the state of
Massachusetts they issued a ringing address, signed by sixteen gentlemen,
in which they arraigned the party for the misdeeds committed when they
were members of that body. They said Vice-President Colfax had been
guilty of corrupt practices, as well as Belknap and Ex-Attorney-General
Williams, and that Robeson had violated his trust. They then referred
to the whisky ring and star route frauds, but the Republican party, as a
party, could not be responsible for these, if there were such. [Applause.]
I advise these gentlemen not to go to Indiana, where Colfax has an
honored name, and where thousands respect him, and tell such things.
[Applause.] It would not be prudent.
752 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
"But Schuyler Colfax has dropped out of public life. Belknap was
impeached, and Robeson investigated by a hostile committee, while ex-Attorney-
General Williams dropped from office and has never been honored
since. [Cheers.] The last time I saw him was at the Republican conven
tion in 1880, joining with these independents to oppose Gen. Grant, on the
ground of morals in politics. [Loud applause.] What was done in the
star route was in the administration of President Hayes, and was brought
to light in the first weeks of Garfield, and both administrations these people
indorsed. [Applause.] The star route was brought to trial under Arthur
[cheers], prosecuted by Republican officials, backed by the party, but theyj
were acquitted by a Democratic jury [applause.], at the head of which was
Dickson, who was a delegate at the Democratic convention, and voted for
Cleveland, and is to-day supporting him with the sixteen gentlemen who signed
that address on the ground of moral consideration. [Laughter and
applause.] Now, gentlemen, as to the personal character of Mr. Elaine, it
becomes me to say nothing. The people of the state where he lives have
passed on his character. [TreVnendous applause.] For twenty-five years he
has stood in the full front and blaze of the sun, one of the leading and most
prominent figures in American history. [Applause.] We don't take our
leaders from obscurities [laughter], nor from men conspicuous to the extent
that they are not known. That has not been the policy of our party.
[Cheers.] The Democrats prefer their armies shall' be led by a skulker
they have awakened up from under the band-wagon, because he shows no
scars. [Laughter and applause.] Mr. Elaine has a tattoo of 16,000
majority. [Great applause.]
"There is only one other question. I did want to say something
about the tariff, but, as I sat in the quiet of my room to-day, I
felt I might subject myself in this vicinity to imminent peril by doing
so, for, when such a man as Senator Hoar, who, in the West we had
supposed was an honorable man — fair and honest — is crushed down by
the rhetoric of David A. Wells, a private like me may take alarm.
[Laughter.] This is to be a campaign, as I understand, where decorous
language is to be used, and the practices of Fontenoy are to be observed.
•Gentlemen, please fire first!' Mr. WTells says Mr. Hoar knows nothing
about the tariff, but many of the sophomores of Harvard are capable to
give the instruction required. We are much obliged, for we know where
to go for information, and when the question comes up as to the duty
on scrap iron, we will leave Mr. Wells and go to Harvard. When we
speak of steel rails we will go to Harvard. [Laughter.] In the club I
came across the essay of the Cobden Club for 1871 and 1872 and it
was one of eighty pages, written by Mr. David A. Wells, who was elected
an honorary member in 1870. I wonder whether he had been withhold
ing it from his own people and giving it to the Eritish public. At page
536, he says ' so excessive and costly is the manufacture of steel rails that
it would be better to burn up the shops.' He gives as a reason that
steel rails could then be bought for $62 a ton. Since then the manu
facture has increased to 1,600,000 tons per annum, and the price has de-
LS
't/t^L\y?
s
-*<
sz-.
^~
^
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1884. 753
creased to $26 or 527 per ton, and that much better than the British
manufacturer ever dreamed of. This is the class of men who now sup
port Grover Cleveland. In that same article he declared that before 1881
we should have no protective legislation. The fact is all the other way.
"In Ohio, there will be a majority of 40,000 for Elaine because of his
protective policy. In closing, I will say that, wherever I go, I find the
same old spirit, and, as sure as you live, there is no state in the West that
does not believe in the honor and ability and the intense Americanism of
James G. Elaine. [Cheers.] And there is not a state there but does not
mean to have our flag all over the world, with perpetual peace secured,
with a manly advocacy of all that is our own, backed by the people.
[Applause.] I have said we are all the sons and daughters of New Eng
land, and we are proud to come and show you what we have achieved
while we loved the firesides of New England, God bless her! [Cheers.]
The Republican party has made our country free. [Applause.] We have
effaced the inscriptions of the bad old times, and the Dred-Scott decision
no longer lives. The story of escaping slaves is no longer heard, but radiant
as a planet is the story of a republic, beneath whose banner every human
being is free to think and vote as he pleases [cheers], and we have the
spirit of a mighty free empire caring for the poorest of her citizens, and
on this account I shall vote for Elaine and Logan."
In a long and carefully prepared speech at Cleveland, delivered
the night of October 6, immediately before the State election of
Ohio, he was now argumentative and mightly in his style, yet
scarcely less interesting. One .portion of this speech was as
follows :
"The reforms of this world rarely come from the skies down, but almost
always from the ground up. This is especially true of reforms which are
at all moral in their nature. The bloody pages of martyrdom required the
self-sacrifice for opinion's sake of but few scholars; but by thousands and
by tens of thousands the plain, honest people have willingly perished in
dungeon, on the scaffold and at the stake for opinion's sake.
"We must deal, after all, with the great, grave questions of the hour.
The two great parties to-day stand confronting each other, both seeking the
indorsement of the people, both making promises for good behavior in the
future. The essential inquiry is not which is the most vehement promise,
but which of the parties promising is the most likely to perform. I might
admit, for thfe purposes of the argument, that the Democratic party in its
platform of the present campaign promise all that we can ask, and yet
refuse to act upon it, for the simple reason that its history renders it utterly
impossible that it will perform any promise looking to the honor or prosper
ity of the country which, under the stress of a great emergency, it may see
fit to make. For nearly a quarter of a century before the war it sought
not only the degradation but the practical destruction of the dignity of free
labor in this country, and why should I take its promise now that it will
promote and elevate it? It refused to recognize the public judgment in the
754 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
election of Abraham Lincoln, and sought the dismemberment of the Nation
for that reason. Why should I accept to-day its promise to strengthen and
extend our National integrity ? It opposed every measure to which our
patriotic people were compelled to resort for th£ prosecution of the war to
save the Union. Why should I now accept its assurances that it was all
the time in favor of the preservation of the Union? It denounced as uncon
stitutional and void all schemes for the establishment of a National cur
rency, and why should I now place the custody of that currency in its
hands? It sought to prevent the enactment of all laws by which the
ballot throughout the boundaries of the Republic should be made free
and fair and equal, and why should I take its promise to make that
ballot free and fair and equal in the future? It has steadily opposed
every scheme to further the protection of American industry, down even
until to-day, and why should I accept its promise to care for and pro
tect American industries in the future? Its history is opposed to its
promises. I decline to place the Nation in the hands of a party which
sought to destroy it. I decline to place the custody of our currency in
the hands of a party which .believes it to be unconstitutional. I decline
to entrust our industries to a party which has steadily and consistently
sought their overthrow.
11 These statements of the position of the Democratic party are not mere
random assertions. There is not a line of legislation in our history for the
last twenty-five years redounding to the honor or prosperity of the Nation
which the Democratic party has not bitterly opposed. Why should I entrust
the National honor to the party which sought its destruction only sixteen
years ago by a declaration in National Convention demanding the practical
repudiation of the public debt? I understand the anxiety of the Demo
cratic party to be rid of its history — its anxiety that a profound silence
should be maintained as to its past record. It has a record which it does
not dare to read; it has a candidate whom it does not dare to exhibit; and
the strongest evidence that we have that there is still some foundation to
work upon for the reform of that party is that it is so profoundly ashamed
of its past history, for where there is no shame for a misdeed there can be
no conversion.
"Feeling this very keenly, patriotic Democrats, and there are thousands
and tens of thousands of such — seek to claim some share in all the glories
of our history since 1861. Mr. Hynes, of the city of Chicago, a most esti
mable gentleman, a very able and a thoroughly patriotic man, in a speech
delivered at Fostoria a few nights since, claims that the Democratic party
is entitled to as much credit for the resumption of specie payments as is
the Republican party. But in this Mr. Hynes is surely mistaken. Doubt
less Mr. Hynes, during the time of the agitation of those questions, was in
favor of a sound and honest currency, but surely his party was not. The
trouble with Mr. Hynes, and with thousands of others of excellent Demo
crats, is that they have been wearing for many years the wrong label. They
have been carrying around a Democratic trademark without really enter
taining a single Democratic principle. This is astonishing, but it is true.
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1884. 755
It is remarkable that a man should mark silk goods down to a calico
price, but this Mr. Hynes and others have done.
41 Now, what are the facts in regard to our currency ? The Democratic
platform of 1868 called for- the payment of the public debt in green
backs, and demanded, in this exact language, • equal taxation of every
species of property according to its real value, including government
bonds and other public securities.' It was deemed necessary in 1869,
as a preliminary to bringing our currency back to a solid basis, to assure
the whole world that we intended honestly to pay our public debt, and
therefore the public credit bill was originated by the Republican party,
pledging the nation to the payment of its debt in coin,, and this bill was
opposed in Congress, as Mr. Hynes will find, by the practically solid
vote of the Democratic party, including James R. Doolittle, who was at
that time wavering between the lines. The Democratic party by a prac
tically solid vote opposed the resumption bill. Finding, in 1876, how
ever, that it was necessary to nominate Mr. Tilden, their Jesuitical plat
form declared for honest money, but, to satisfy the rank and file of the
party, denounced the Republican party for hindering resumption. In Jan
uary, 1876, the bill to repeal the resumption act received 112 votes, all
Democrats but one. In June, 1876, as a rider to the civil appropriation
bill, an amendment repealing the resumption act received solid Demo
cratic support. The party was not converted by its double-headed plat
form ; for on the 5th of August, 1876, a measure to repeal the fixing of
the time ior resumption received in the House 106 votes, all Democratic
but three, and the platforms of the Democratic party, almost throughout
the Union, demanded in explicit terms the immediate repeal of the specie
resumption act. The contest was not closed until 1878, when the Dem
ocratic party as a party solidly favored the heresy of fiat money, at which
time James G. Elaine visited the West and was the leader in the great
final battle for honest money ; and in the State of Illinois that heresy
was buried under a majority of 40,000. That for the time closed the
contest. Specie payments were resumed, and the efforts of the Demo
cratic party in that direction ceased only because they could not repeal
an accomplished fact, any more than they could repeal yesterday's sunrise.
"Equally hollow is it for Mr. Hynes or other Democratic orators to
claim that the Democratic party is in favor of a free ballot. They called
for it, it is true, in 1880, and they demand it again in their platform of
1884, but the solid Democracy in Congress opposed the registry laws, and
has again and again sought their repeal. It has repealed registry legis
lation in this State and in New York, and the party which professes to
be in favor of a free ballot and a fair count shows this extraordinary
record: In 1872 the Republican vote of Alabama was 90,272; in 1878
it was nothing. In 1872 the Republican vote of Arkansas was 41,373 ;
in 1878 it was 115. In 1872 the Republican vote of Mississippi was
82,175 ; in 1878 it was 1,168. These instances, in the main, hold good
through the entire South. In 1876 the Republican vote in South Caro
lina was 91,870; in 1878 only 213 Republican votes were counted. In
756 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
1876 the Republican majority in Louisiana was over 20,000: two years
later the vote disappeared from the election returns.
"These facts, which are the shame of our present history, are of record.
No language can exaggerate their importance, nor the stupendous crime
which makes such a condition of things a possibility.
"While, in the main, the people of this country do not require a
change, in these respects they loudly demand a change, and insist upon
it that the guaranty of a free ballot and a fair count, of equality, of
political privileges, embodied in the Constitution, shall be religiously per
formed. This is American policy, and it is typified in the persons of
Blaine and Logan.
" For many years the Democrats have been vehement in demanding a
change, but for just what reason they require it they have always been
and still are unable satisfactorily to state. Certain changes we will have
and do have. We will have a change from one Republican administra
tion to another. We had a change from Grant to Hayes, and from
Hayes to Garfield, whose untimely death made a change to Arthur, and
we are about to have a change from the cleanly and patriotic and
thoroughly upright administration of Chester A. Arthur to the thorough
and cleanly and patriotic administration of James G. Blaine. [Cheers.]
We will change administrations, but we decline to change policies. We
are willing to exchange one Union-saver for another Union-saver, one
friend of American industries for another friend of American industries ;
but the poorest Union-saver is better than the best Union-hater, and the
commonest friend of American industries is better than the most thoroughly
accomplished enemy of our labor and its prosperity.
"When the country most needed a change, in 1860, the Democratic
party was opposed to it. In 1860 our national wealth was $14,000,000. In
1880, under the influences of Republican policy, it had increased to 544,000,
000,000 — an increase of over $125,000,000 per month, equal to one-third
the daily accumulations of mankind.
"In 1860 our manufactures amounted in value to $1,885,000,000. Then
the Democratic party did not desire a change. In 1883 they amounted to
$5,300,000,000, and now it demands a change. In 1860 the productions of
our coal mines were 14,000,000 tons. The Democratic party was satisfied.
" In 1883 the production of our coal mines was 96,000,000 tons, and now
it demands a change. We to-day import one-tenth as much cotton as we
imported in 1860, and we now export 150,000,000 yards per year. But the
Democratic party, dissatisfied with the present situation, demands a change.
We import no more silk now than we did in 1860, but we produce six
times as much ; and still the Democratic party demands a change. Our
wool production in 1880 was four times as large as in 1860, and the prices
were higher than in 1860, and yet the Democratic party demands a change.
In 1860 our productions of iron ore were 900,000 tons. This satisfied the
Democratic party. But in 1883 the productions were over 8,000,000 tons,
and hence it demands a change. [Laughter.] In 1860 we had 30,000
miles of railroad. This suited the conservative Democracy. In 1884 we
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1884. 757
have 100,000 miles of railroad, and it demands a change. In 1868 our
freight charges to New York from Chicago were 42 cents per bushel. In
1883 they were 16 cents per bushel. And Democracy now demands a
change. Down to 1861, covering the entire period of our National history,
the value of our exports had been £9,000,000,000 ; with this the conservative
Democracy was content. But since 1861, a period of only twenty-three
years, the value of our exports has been $ 12, 000,000,000. This is not
satisfactory, and the conservative Democrat demands a change. [Laughter.]
"I am aware that Democratic orators claim that these marvelous exhib
itions of prosperity are due to the fertility of our soil, favoring conditions
of climate, and our great territorial extent. But the satisfactory answer
to this is that the skies were just AS blue, the soil was just as fertile, before
1861, as they have been since, and that this colossal development has
occurred under what is to-day Republican policy in government. [Applause.]
There is nothing impossible with the Almighty, but he would never under
take to make this country prosperous, even if the skies were of the bluest,
the soil the most fertile, and our fields groaning under harvests, if running
alongside them were a debased and shifting currency, an impaired National
credit, and an unrestricted competition with the cheap and pauperized labor
of the old world. [Applause.]
" So far as the question of protection to our industries is concerned,
notwithstanding the asseverations of certain Democratic orators to the
contrary, the policy of the Democratic party has been steadily against
protection and in favor of free-trade. This a very hurried reference
to its record will demonstrate. In 1876 the Democratic platform demanded
that all custom house taxation should be 'for revenue only.' The
Democratic platform of 1880 demanded a 'tariff for revenue only.'
The policy of the party is entirely harmonious with that of the South
ern Confederacy ; for by the Constitution of the Southern Confederacy
it was provided, 'No bounty shall be granted from the treasury, nor
shall any duties be laid to promote or foster any branch of industry.'
The attitude of the Democratic party, therefore, during all these years,
was entirely that of the Southern Confederacy. A fair interpretation of
its platform of 1884 leads to precisely the same result. Its language is,
4 We therefore denounce the abuses of the existing tariff.' But it is to
be observed that it does not enumerate these abuses. Further, 'We
demand that Federal taxation shall be exclusively for public purposes
and shall not exceed the needs of the Government economically admin
istered.' This is somewhat obscure, but its meaning is not difficult to
reach. 'Federal taxation' means the tariff; 'exclusively' means 'only,'
and 'public purposes' can have no meaning but 'revenue,' and there
fore, reduced to our every -day vernacular, it reads, 'We' demand that
the tariff shall be only for revenue,' So that its present position is
entirely in harmony with its past.
"In what I have thus far said with regard to the record of the Demo
cratic party, it is entirely fair for me to say that its candidates stand upon
its records so far as we are able to ascertain. In his letter of acceptance,
LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
Governor Cleveland says, ' I have carefully considered the platform adopted
by the convention and cordially approve the same.' The attitude of Mr.
Hendricks has been too well known to require comment. So that the pos
ition of the Democratic party being clearly ascertained, we have only to
inquire, Are we in favor of it?
"There is no abler exponent of the free-trade Democratic doctrine in
this country, perhaps, than Mr. David A. Wells. A Democratic philoso
pher and a philosophic Democrat, a member of the Cobden Club, he looks
upon free-trade as the means by which a millenium among the nations is
to be secured, and the estimate in which he holds our policy of protec
tion is clearly indicated by an essay written by him for the Cobden Club,
and published in its collection of essays in 1871, in which, referring to the
tariff of twenty-eight dollars per ton upon steel rails, he says that the tar
iff is ' so excessive and costly that it would be more profitable for the coun
try at large to buy and burn up all the existing establishments and pension
all the workmen, rather than continue the business under existing arrange
ments.' Mr. Wells proceeds to state in the same essay that in the event
this tariff had not been imposed, steel rails could have been laid down in
New York for sixty-two dollars a ton ; and he cheers and gratifies his Eng
lish brethren at the close of his essay by saying : ' It is safe to predict that
ten years will not elapse before every vestige of restrictive and discrimina
ting legislation will be struck from the National statute book.'
"The advocates of protection have always insisted that such a spirit of
competition grows up from it as not to enhance, but rather to cheapen the
product, and this has steadily been denied by the free-trader. How greatly
Mr. Wells was at fault the experience of the years since 1871, when this
remarkable essay was written, has demonstrated. At that time this great
industry was practically in its infancy in this country ; but encouraged and
stimulated by protection, it has developed to such an extent that our
capacity is greater than that of any other country on the face of the earth,
and steel rails manufactured by our own people are to-day for sale in the
American market at the rate of $27 per ton. Had the advice of Mr. Wells
been followed the thousands and the tens and hundreds of thousands of
men engaged in these establishments would have found no employment;
the tens of thousands of men engaged in the various branches of industry
collateral to this would have found no employment. Our own steel rail
manufactories would have been destroyed by the influx of the English pro
duct, and the instant that result was accomplished prices would have been
advanced and the transportation interests of this country would have been
chained to the car of the English manufacturer.
" I do not need in this presence to descant upon nor argue the case of
protection as against free-trade. It is enough I apprehend, for me to show
what the attitude of our parties really is. The figures which I have already
given demonstrate that every interest is promoted by protection. The price
of labor is advanced and it has been the policy of the Republican party
from the beginning so to legislate that there might be an honest day's
wages for an honest day's toil paid in honest money. Mr. Blaine uses this
THE CAMPAIGN OF 1884. 759
emphatic language, and covers not only the ground of protecting the manu
factured article, but protecting the laborer himself: 'The Republican
party has protected the free labor of America so that its compensation is
larger than is realized in any other country, and it has guarded our people
against the unfair competition of contract labor from China, and may be
called upon to prohibit the growth of a similar evil from Europe. It is
obviously unfair to permit capitalists to make contracts for cheap labor in
foreign countries to the hurt and disparagement of the labor of American
citizens.' This is the doctrine of our candidate. It covers the whole
ground of the controversy. And on this great, vital question, in which the
hearths and homes of hundreds of thousands of industrious citizens through
out this country are involved, Grover Cleveland has not one word to say,
and, so far as we know, has never had a thought.
"The exhibit that I have made of the wonderful growth of our coun
try since 1860 encounters one extraordinary exception, viz., our shipping
interests, and with reference to those Mr. Hendricks says that the obituary
of our merchant marine is witten in our tariff and shipping laws. If
Mr. Hendricks does not know that this statement is false he is not
nearly so well versed in the history of his country and of that great
interest as a candidate for Vice President surely ought to be. Nowr
what are the facts, and where shall we seek the explanation of this
decline in our shipping interests? First it is important to mention that
from 1855 to 1861 there was a relative decrease, for reasons surely not
attributable to the Republican party, of over 16 per cent. In 1848 the
value of the total imports and exports in American ships was about
$240,000,000 against about $7 1 ,000,000 in foreign ships, and the British
Government then paid $3,250,000 annually as subsidies. From that time
she at once began increasing her subsidies, and at the breaking out of
the war in 1861 they were nearly five million dollars, while our tonnage
had run down from five hundred millions in 1860 to three hundred and
eighty-one millions in 1861. In the years 1870 and 1871, in response to
the Pacific Mail subsidy, Great Britain ran her subsidies up to over six
millions. So that in 1882, by this policy, she had reduced the value of
our imports and exports under our flag to two hundred and forty-two
millions, and had increased hers to one billion three hundred millions. It
is idle to talk of the individual shipbuilder competing not only against the
British shipbuilder, but the British Government as well. The policy pursued
by the British Government has been wise. The value of the English fleet is
to-day $1,000,000,000, and of this $900,000,000 has been expended for labor.
This policy has given employment to 240,000 men regularly and 220,000
more to run the ships. The gross earnings of this fleet have been $330,000,-
ooo. Our country pays $100,000,000 for the service of these ships, and now the
clamor is for free ships. Free ships will not relieve us. Great Britain might
present to us five hundred vessels free of charge, and yet, as the case now
stands, we could not successfully encounter the competition ; for behind the
English ship-owner and builder and master stands, as I have said, the
British treasury, and until the Treasury of the United States, which has
LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
granted hundreds of millions of subsidies to railroads, shall hold its shield
over and stand behind the American ship-owner and builder it is idle to
look for a change in the present condition of affairs. Does not this demon
strate that we need an American policy?"
The defeat of the Republican party at the polls in November
did not lessen his belief in either the party, for which he had so
earnestly and never more ably than during the year of 1884,
battled, nor in its leaders. He was a thorough party spirit even
at the death. There was something splendid in the way he
replied to the question. "Do you think this defeat seriously
affects the future of the party?" put to him by an interviewer
for the New York Tribune. "On the contrary, I think it solidi
fies the party. We are now a compact, powerful, splendid
political organization, identical in opinion and purpose. It is a
curious feature of the triumph of the Democratic party at this
election that the only reason that the country will not be greatly
damaged by its success is that its success has not been complete,
and the only hope of the patriotic Democrat is, not that his
party has triumphed but that 1t has not triumphed completely.
The salvation of the country rests on the fact, not that Cleve
land is elected — the hope of success on the part of all our great
industries rests not on the fact that he is to be our next Presi
dent, but rather in the fact that, being our next President, he
and the House of Representatives behind him will be unable to
carry out the doctrine which he represents, because of the inter
position of the Republican senate; and so again, as in the count
less instances of the past, the Republican party saves the coun
try. I look for a strengthening from this time forward of the
Republican party, and within two years I expect that every
Northern State will wheel into line under its banners." The
reason of the defeat, he ascribed solely to the address of the
New York Presbyterian clergyman who made use of the unfortu
nate alliteration "Rum, Romanism, and Rebellion." This was
an insult to the Catholic priests and clergy present, and to
Catholic sentiment throughout the country. The Democrats made
ready and able use of the expression, Every dead-wall was
placarded with it, and the pews of the Catholic churches were
filled with it on the Sunday which immediately preceded the
polling of votes. To correct it was impossible.
CHAPTER XLIII.
LEGALITY OF "TRIAL BY INFORMATION."
MR. STORKS' LAST CASE — THE ELECTION FRAUD IN THE i8TH WARD OF
CHICAGO— JOSEPH C. MACKIN AND OTHERS TRIED BY INFORMATION
INSTEAD OF ON INDICTMENT— MR. STORRS MOVES FOR A WRIT OF ERROR
— THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES AFTER HIS DEATH, SUS
TAINS HIS POINTS — A POSTHUMOUS VICTORY.
THE last case upon which Mr. Storrs was employed was one
which attracted attention and excited discussion throughout
the country. It involved a more than usually bold and daring
outrage upon the purity of the ballot box, which every American
looks upon as the palladium of liberty. In the Presidential
election of 1884, it so happened that an equal number of delegates
to the State Legislature of Illinois were elected by each party,
and as there was to be a Senator from Illinois chosen to succeed
John A. Logan, the Democratic managers naturally thought it
would be a desirable thing if a Republican Legislator could be
counted out, and a Democrat returned to Springfield in his place.
Mr. Joseph Chesterfield Mackin, secretary of all the Democratic
committees, undertook to accomplish this end, and unfortunately
chose the second precinct of the i8th ward of Chicago for his
operations. The successful Republican ticket bore the name of
Mr. Henry W. Leman as State Senator for that district. Mr.
Leman was a young Chicago lawyer, the son-in-law of a wealthy
merchant living on Dearborn Avenue, and his' opponent was Mr.
Rudolph Brand, a brewer of lager beer. Mackin undertook to
falsify the returns for the second precinct, which included Dear
born Avenue, and give Brand a majority by forging the tally-
sheet and substituting spurious ballots, fac-similes of the genuine
Republican ticket in all respects except that Brand's name took
761
/62 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
the place of Leman's, in place of the regular Republican ballots
cast. For this purpose he had to win over to his wishes some
of the clerks employed in the office of the County Clerk, so as
to obtain access to the ballot box after it had been deposited in
the County Clerk's office. Next, he had to obtain the services
of a skillful penman, expert at forgery. He found no difficulty
in securing the help he wanted. When the County Clerk came
to canvass the vote of that precinct, it was found that by some
hocus-pocus Brand and Leman had changed places on the tally-
sheet, the exact majority actually voted for the one being recorded
for the other. There were erasures and alterations on the sheet
which looked suspicious, and the District Attorney of the United
States, Colonel R. S. Tuthill, took the matter up and brought it
before the Federal grand jury then in session. A writ was
obtained from Judge Blodgett commanding the County Clerk to
appear before the Federal grand jury with the ballots and return.
This was served on the 2 1st of November about noon, and the
same night Mackin had printed a sufficient number of bogus
ballots to take the place of the genuine ones, got them placed in
the ballot-box by the aid of the County Clerk's treacherous
subordinate, and next day all seemed to be ready for the inspec
tion of the grand jury.
We have said that Mackin was unfortunate in choosing the
second precinct of the i8th ward for this nefarious operation. In
that precinct resided not only Leman himself, the State Senator-
elect, but also his wealthy father-in-law, and a large and influen
tial circle of friends. Not only had Mackin allowed the ballot
of Mr. Leman's father-in-law to be changed, but also that of
Hon. E. B. Washburne and other prominent Republican citizens.
So clumsy a fraud was certain to be detected on examination
of the ballots, but Mackin had hoped to shield himself and his
confederates by the declaration of the County Clerk and the
other members of the canvassing board that they had no power
to ugo behind the return." Here, however, was a Federal grand
jury who 'persisted in going behind the return ; who came to the
conclusion that the return itself was a forgery, and who speedily
discovered a suspicious newness and uniformity of appearance in
the bogus substituted ballots. Mr. Washburne and other well-
known Republicans, among them Mr. Leman's own father-in-law,
LEGALITY OF "TRIAL BY INFORMATION." 763
were returned as having voted for Brand, and they all came before
the grand jury and testified, some by affidavit and some in per
son, that the substituted ballot was a fraud, and that they had
voted the straight Republican ticket, which included Mr. Leman's
name.
On the same ticket, along with the names of the Republican
candidate for President and Vice President of the United. States,
and the names of State officers, was the name of the Republican
candidate for Congressman from that district. Upon this fact
alone, Judge Blodgett assumed jurisdiction under the Act of
Congress in ordering the ballots to be brought into his court for
inspection. The printers whom Mackin had hired to do his
disreputable work took alarm as soon as they learned of the
discoveries made by the grand jury, and they went before that
body and disclosed Mackin's agency in the transaction. Other
evidence fastened the guilt of the forging of the return upon
another Democratic worker named W. J. Gallagher, and the
treacherous connivance from within the County Clerk's office
upon two of his deputies, Arthur Gleason and Henry Biehl.
District Attorney Tuthill, on the 2Oth of January, 1885, moved
for leave to file a criminal information against these four persons
for violating section 5440 §>f the Revised Statutes of the United
States, which was granted, and the defendants were taken into
custody on a bench warrant and admitted to bail in 310,000
each.
The section under which they were put upon trial is one pro
viding for a penalty against persons conspiring to commit an
offence against the United States, or to defraud the United States.
On this charge of conspiracy, Mackin, Gallagher, Gleason, and
Biehl were tried in the United States Court before Judge Blod
gett and a jury, the trial commencing on the 5th of February
1885, and lasting till the 2ist of the same month, when the jury
returned a verdict of guilty against Mackin, Gallagher, and Glea-i
son, and acquitted Biehl. Before the trial, a motion to quash
the indictment was made, on the ground that the facts set forth
in the information merely showed a design to change the vote
for State Senator, and therefore that the jurisdiction of the case
belonged to the State Courts only, and that the Federal Court
had no jurisdiction. This motion was overruled, but the same
764 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
line of argument was mainly relied upon in the speeches of coun
sel for the defence on the trial. It was also made the principal
ground for the motion for a new trial, which was likewise over
ruled. Mackin and Gallagher were sentenced to two years impris
onment in Joliet penitentiary, and to pay a fine of $5000 each.
It was at the stage of the proceedings that Mr. Storrs came
into the case. Other counsel had conducted an unavailing defence
on the trial before a jury, and it was well-known that Mr. Storrs'
political sympathies were rather with the prosecution than with
the defendants. But it was hardly a surprise to the community
in which Mr. Storrs' reputation as a lawyer stood so high that
his employment as a last resource in desperate cases had come
to be looked for as a matter of course, when he appeared on
the 2 1st of March before Judge Blodgett to apply for an exten
sion of the time for removing the prisoners from the county jail
to Joliet. Mr. Storrs was at first exceedingly reluctant to take
up the case, and it was only after a good deal of pressure exer
cised upon him privately from a quarter that was always influ
ential with him, joined to the entreaties of friends and near con
nections of Mackin, as well as of Mackin himself, that he finally
concluded to do so. Having once engaged himself, he put aside
all personal feelings and political prejudices, and viewed the case
simply from the standpoint of professional duty. As was his
wont, he identified himself with the interests of his client, and
devoted all the resources of professional learning, skill, and exper
ience to that client's service. He applied to Judge Gresham for
a writ of error and supersedeas, and argued the motion before
that distinguished Judge on the same day on which he had
obtained from Judge Blodgett a stay of proceedings.
He had in the meantime carefully considered the case, and
saw that one important point had been overlooked by counsel
upon the trial, — namely, the question whether an information
would lie for the offence with which Mackin was charged. He
concurred with their view as to the jurisdiction of the Federal
court in the case, but after looking through the authorities, and
especially a decision recently given by Mr. Justice Gray, he had
reached the conclusion that the course pursued by the District
Attorney was wrong from the beginning, and that, even suppo
sing the Court to have jurisdiction, the defendants should have
been tried upon presentment by the grand jury, and not by
LEGALITY OF "TRIAL BY INFORMATION." 765
information. He argued these points before Judge Gresham in
their logical order. First he took up the point of jurisdiction.
Xo report of his argument having been published, it will be a
source of enlightenment to a great many people, newspaper wri
ters included, who at the time were so impatient of technicalities
in view of the plain and overwhelming evidence against Mack in
that they regarded the counsel who raised them merely as an
obstructor of justice, if we reproduce some portions of it here.
At the very outset, Mr. Storrs made a clear distinction between
the vindication of a constitutional principle, lying at the founda
tion of the liberties of every citizen, and the mere salvation of
an individual from punishment. He began by saying :
"I think it perfectly safe to assume that the substance of all the argu
ments which have been addressed to your Honor in opposition to the peti
tion made in this case for a writ of error and supersedeas, is embodied in
the very elaborate charge of Judge Blodgett to the jury, and upon which
charge the verdict was rendered against three of the defendants on trial.
Upon a careful reading of that charge, I am led to the conclusion that it
would be hardly possible that a more able and adroit argument of the case
on behalf of the government could have been or can be made. This is
true particularly as to so much of the charge as relates to one of the pro
positions which it is my purpose to discuss upon this petition, namely, the
question of the jurisdiction of the United States courts over this case. It
will suit my purpose to comment, before I finish, upon that charge some
what in detail, for if I succeed in establishing in the mind of your Honor
a doubt as to the correctness of the legal propositions there advanced, so
far as this application is concerned, my purpose is achieved, and the writ
of error and supersedeas will follow from that doubt as a matter of course.
For, as I understand the attitude of this question, it is not necessary that
we should convince the court as to the correctness of the positions which
we maintain to the extent that the court will feel justified in reversing the
judgment entered upon this verdict, but it is enough for us, and our pur
pose is accomplished, if we establish a fair ground of belief that the tribu
nal before whom this case will be heard, if a writ of error were issued,
would reach a conclusion different from that arrived at before the trial
judge.
" Not having been connected with the case at all until a very recent date,
and my examination of the case having had no necessary connection with
the inquiry as to the guilt or the innocence of the accused of the charge
preferred against them in the information, I am relieved from all necessity
of discussing those matters of fact, and indeed, they can with propriety be
hardly said to be before the court at all; for in such a discussion as that
in which we are now engaged the abstract question of law becomes the
real question, and the individual in whose behalf that abstract question is
presented, does not enter into the contemplation, either of counsel or of
766 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORRS.
court. As to the enormity of the offense of which it is alleged these
defendants and petitioners have been guilty, I have nothing to say further
than that I am quite prepared to go as far as any one in denunciation of
the crime of stuffing the ballot-box, or in any way, by fraud, violence or
other methods, intimidating the voter, or by any means of corruption bring
ing about a different result than the voice of a majority of the citizens
actually accomplished."
On the question of jurisdiction, he cited a Louisiana case,
U. S. v. NicJiolson, 3 Woods, 215, in which Judge Woods laid
down the law in these words: "No matter how much it affected
the results of the election for ward officers, parish officers and
members of the state legislature; we have nothing to do with
that, and unless the purpose of the defendants was to affect the
election of members of Congress, there can be no conviction in
this case."
He proceeded to argue, as had been done by other counsel at
a former stage, that as the act of the defendants affected only
the election of a State officer, no offence against the United
States had been committed. Judge Blodgett, in his charge to
the jury, had used this language:
"It is charged that 230 ballots regularly cast at said election were
destroyed or removed from the envelope in which they had been properly
placed and sealed up, and that there were substituted in place of those so
removed 230 other papers like those destroyed or removed, except that
Brand's name for State Senator was substituted for Leman's, and, as the
proof tends to show, all these ballots were for George E. Adams for repre
sentative for Congress. This fact affects the vote for representative to
Congress, because there is no means of determining who those 230 voters
voted for for representative. They may not have voted for Adams at all, or
only a part of them may have voted for him, and hence the removal of
those ballots is an offense against the United States."
In answer to this, Mr. Storrs contended that the real inquiry
was, first, whether the overt acts shown upon the trial did affect
the election of a member of congress, and second, whether they
were intended to affect such election.
"And here it is proper to observe, that we must narrow the field of
inquiry which Judge Blodgett has occupied. We cannot float out into the
wide ocean of conjecture and guess-work. Our inquiry is not whether, by
some remote possibility or contingency, these acts might have affected the
election. For, in the case cited, the jurisdiction of the Federal courts over
state officers, is asserted on no such dangerous basis. The inquiry is, did
those acts affect such election? Whether they did or not is a matter sus
ceptible of explicit proof. Whether they might, under a certain state of
LEGALITY OF "TRIAL BY INFORMATION." /6/
circumstances which may be imagined, have affected an election, is so
difficult of proof, and so dangerous in its character, as not legitimately to be
made the subject of judicial inquiry.
" Moreover, unless by the acts complained of, the defendants intended to
affect such an election, there can, under the rulings of the court to which
1 have referred, be no legal or justifiable conviction. And for the Federal
courts to assume and maintain jurisdiction in the absence of any such
intent, is a usurpation of power, and a stretching of jurisdiction not perhaps
as dangerous in its results and consequences as the crime complained of,
but sufficiently serious and grave in character to admonish extreme caution.
"There is not a scintilla of evidence that any or either of the acts done
did affect the election of a member of Congress, nor is there the slightest
evidence on record that any person on trial had any such purpose or object
in, view, or ever entertained any such intention.
" I may go further and say that the case and public history since that
time both demonstrate that the election of a member of Congress was not
affected, and that the specific facts offered in evidence upon trial, so far as
they had any tendency whatever to throw light on the question, tend to
show that neither of these defendants ever entertained any such purpose.
"It is barely possible that an act of Congress might have been so framed
as to have made Judge Blodgett's rulings upon this branch of the case
good law, but it is enough to say that there is no such act of Congress in
existence, and probably never will be. Congressional legislation upon these
subjects has reached its uttermost limits, and the current of public and con
gressional opinion is now setting strongly the other way. I think it is safe
to say that we shall never see upon the Federal statute books an enactment,
that any act done by a state officer which might affect the ^election of a
member of Congress shall be punishable in the Federal court."
Judge Blodgett had instructed the jury that by the statutes of
Illinois, the duty of safely keeping all the poll books, etc., was
imposed upon the county clerk and his deputies. To this Mr.
Storrs took exception, so far as the deputies, of whom there
were then sixteen in the office, were concerned.
"When we speak of an officer of election, everybody knows what we mean ;
and if the meaning and significance of that phrase is to be extended beyond
officers who officiated at the election, there is no place where we may
stop. If it includes every man who has something to do to perfect the will
of the people as expressed at the election, and to absolutely induct and
clothe the person elected with all the muniments and evidences of power,
into office, there is no end to it. Everybody almost is in that sense an
officer of election. The governor puts the finishing touch here in this
state. He is not an officer of election ; but until he acts, the election so far
as its final result is concerned is not consummated. Last fall I was engaged,
not as an officer of election but as an active participant in an election. I
came home from it a madder and a wiser man. A great many millions of
people voted, and finally as a consummation on the 4th day of March last,
76c8 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
there stood on the steps of the capitol at Washington, in the presence of
more than 50,000 people, Grover Cleveland, and in front of him the chief
justice of the United States, who handed to him a Bible, and administered
to him the oath of office, and then, and not until then, was Grover Cleveland
the president of the United States. Was Chief Justice Waite an officer of
election? It won't do. The cake is much too large for the platter; the
interpretation is altogether too big, and there is no necessity which requires
it."
To another proposition contained in Judge Blodgett's charge,
Mr. Storrs made an effective reply, which went to the very root
of this question of Federal jurisdiction. He said:
"After thus sufficiently misinterpreting the statutes, the court proceeds to
misstate the effect of the acts complained of, and for the purposes of this
argument it may be assumed proven. He says : 'When the certificate of the
result of an election for a member of Congress, or any other officer for
that matter, is altered in any material particular, such certificate is legally
destroyed, and is no longer evidence of what it originally stated. It is no
longer the document which the judges and clerks signed, but it is a
different document, and it makes a different statement.'
"The consequences might indeed be exceedingly disastrous, was this
extraordinary doctrine of Judge Blodgett to be sustained. It would be
within the power, where great numbers of officers for different offices were
voted for, of one bad man, by a single alteration in the certificate as to the
vote for one official, even of the most insignificant character, to defeat the
entire popular will as to all the other officers voted for throughout the entire
state, indeed, throughout the entire nation. Such a thing can be conceived
of as that the election of President Cleveland might have rested entirely
upon the electoral vote of this state, and that electoral vote have been
determined by the vote cast for him in this very precinct, and yet, we are
assured that the public will of the people of the United States would have
been defeated, had some officious scoundrel fraudulently altered a certificate
as to the vote cast for coroner in that precinct.
"Now, if I am correct in my view of the case, that the balance of the
certificate stands, notwithstanding the fraudulent alteration as to the vote
for state senator, two conclusions are inevitable ; first, that nothing in that
direction charged in the information did in point of fact affect the election
for representative to Congress, and, second, it will be clear, beyond debate,
that all the evidence in this case— and it is the great volume of the evidence
in this case— showing or tending to show the fraudulent change in the vote
for state senator was entirely irrelevant and incompetent, and had no place
before the jury in the court in which this case was tried."
After citing a long array of authorities in support of his posi
tion, he next addressed himself to the right of the District
Attorney to file an information in such a case. On this branch
of the subject he began by saying :
LEGALITY OF "TRIAL BY INFORMATION." 769
"The right, if any right exists at all — which I do not deny — to file infor
mations in the Federal courts, is not derived from the common law, for the
Federal courts have no common law powers or jurisdiction. Their powers
come from Congress and from Congress alone, and by section 1022 of the
United States statutes at large, it is provided as follows : • All crimes and
offenses committed against the provisions of chapter 7, titled, 'Crimes'
which are not infamous may be prosecuted either by indictment or by
information filed by a district attorney.' It is clear that Congress supposed
that there were crimes embodied in the title indicated, and in which are
embraced sections 5515, 5512 and 5511, which were infamous, and as to
those crimes, no information would lie.
"My objections to this information are two-fold.
1 ' First, that even if it be assumed for the purposes of the argument, that
an information could be filed, this particular information has no foundation
upon which to rest, and should be summarily stricken from the record for
that reason.
"It is not my purpose to detain the court by any lengthy or protracted
discussion as to the history of informations. It is enough to say, that they
are regarded, both in this country and in England, with the greatest dis
favor and suspicion, and that they are, even in cases where they are
allowed at all — so high is the regard for the liberty of the individual — not
permitted unless the proper foundations are laid, and it has finally become
clearly the settled law that no information will be entertained and fried by
the district attorney where leave of court to file such information has not
first been secured. Leave of court in this case has been obtained, as the
record shows; but it is equally well settled law that leave will not be
granted and ought not to be granted unless a proper foundation is laid —
that proper foundation being furnishing to the court to whom the application
for such leave is made, legal evidence of the facts upon which the infor
mation itself is based. That in this case has not been done, and a more
shallow, a more utterly absurd, a more weak and a more dangerous foun
dation for so serious a proceeding cannot be found in the whole record of
criminal informations."
He showed, from a review of the record, that the only founda
tion for the District Attorney's information was the affidavit of
one Albert M. Day, who after swearing to the general course of
the election and the fact of the falsification of the return, added
that "this affiant is informed and verily believes" that the
defendants were the persons guilty of the fraud. So that the
sole ground for the trial was the affidavit of a man who did not
even profess to know the facts upon which the charge was
brought, and Mr. Storrs claimed that to arrest any man upon
such an affidavit was a travesty of justice.
"The most disgraceful pages in English history, so far as its administra
tion of justice is concerned, are those which record the interference with the
49
7/O LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
lives, liberties and property of the citizen by information, and wherever the
grand jury system has been abolished and proceeding by information sub
stituted in its place, the method of proceeding by information has been
so guarded and hedged against outrage and abuse as practically to
operate — although the name has been changed — as a substitution in point
of fact for the grand jury system of another judicial proceeding where
inquiry was openly had upon the facts stated on oath, and no action was
had except upon evidence legal in its character and competent to convict.
And so I say, even if we stop here, this whole fabric should be razed to
the ground. I urge this because, among other reasons, I desire to see the
jurisdiction of the Federal courts sustained and maintained, but I do not
believe, that if the powers of Federal tribunals are thus to be prostituted,
they can long stand against an aroused public and congressional opinion
which such a policy is sure to excite.
"But next: Could in this case an information under any circumstances
have been filed? And this, without further discussion, I suggest, depends
entirely upon the consideration as to whether the offense of which these
defendants have been convicted and for which they have been sentenced, is
infamous. So much has been written and so much said in the vain effort
to determine what is infamous, and the authorities are so far apart, and so
utterly irreconcilable upon that question, that I will not attempt to discuss
them in detail nor to reconcile them. Judge Blodgett evidently regarded
the offense as infamous, for, in speaking of it in his charge, he said: 'It
is conceded that a great crime has been committed, a crime in comparison
with which armed and open treason becomes a trivial offense.' Armed and
open treason against the government of the United States is a capital offense ;
it involves the wicked sacrifice of countless lives, and the destruction, and
wasteful destruction, of millions of property ; but, compared with this offense,
it is trivial. And yet, the gentlemen who are maintaining and endeavoring
to sustain this proceeding say, that the offense which the judge, whose charge
they are thus supporting, characterizes as so gross that armed and open
treason becomes beside it a trivial offense, is not an infamous offense.
"In this case, as we have already seen, the punishment may be and will
be, if the sentence is enforced, imprisonment of each of the defendants
upon whom sentence has been passed, in the penitentiary for a period of
two years. The effect of such imprisonment is to render, under the laws
of the State of Illinois, the party suffering it, infamous. It may operate to
sunder his domestic relations, for, among the causes for divorce enumerated
in our statutes, one is where either party has been convicted of felony or
other infamous crime, and, under the well settled law of this state, an
offense followed by imprisonment in the penitentiary is a felony. Moreover,
I insist that the yoth section of our election laws is applicable to such a
case. That section provides that no person who has been legally convicted
of any crime, the punishment of which is confinement in the penitentiary,
shall be permitted to vote at any election, unless he be restored to the
right to vote by pardon. There is no territorial limitation under this
section. There is no exception of persons in this section. There is no line
LEGALITY OF "TRIAL BY INFORMATION. //I
drawn between courts in which the conviction has been had. This great
state proposes to keep, so far as it can by legislative enactment, its ballot
unpolluted from the hand of the convicted felon ; it requires only that the
conviction shall be legal, and is quite indifferent as to the court in which
the conviction has been had, or the state or place where it has been had.
" I suggest most respectfully to your Honor that it is well for us to pause
and inquire whether the infliction of the sentence imposed by the court in
this case with the consequences which follow, family relations sundered,
civil and political rights destroyed, does not affix upon the convicted a
disgrace so indelible that the mildest form of language, judging the crime
for which they have suffered by the consequences following from its com
mission, would characterize it as infamous."
The gravity of the questions thus presented was sufficiently
serious in the mind of Judge Gresham to induce him to grant
the writ of error and supersedeas, and admit the defendants to
bail. The case was afterwards reviewed by Mr. Justice Harlan
and Judge Gresham, to whom Mr. Storrs addressed an argument
which, in the opinion of many who heard it, was the crowning
effort of his professional career. The court-room was crowded,
and as we so often hear in reports of public entertainments, — as
was the fact, indeed, wherever Mr. Storrs was announced to
speak outside of Chicago, — hundreds were turned away for want
of room. In his argument upon this occasion, he addressed him
self exclusively to the legality of trying such a case by informa
tion, for it had now become apparent to the prosecution them
selves that the constitutional question here involved was the
most serious one they had to grapple with. The fifth amend
ment to the constitution of the United States says:
"No person shall be held to answer for a capital or otherwise
infamous crime unless on the presentment or indictment of a
grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval force or in
the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public
danger." The main question to be considered, therefore, was
whether the crime charged against Mackin and his accomplices
was an "infamous" crime. Mr. Storrs quoted from Judge Gray's
opinion the language of Lord Auckland: "There are two kinds
of infamy; the one founded in the opinions of the people respecting
the mode of punishment; the other in the construction of law
respecting the future credibility of the delinquent." The latter
classification was not claimed in this case, and therefore the sole
question to be considered in determining the construction to be
772 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
put upon the word "infamous" was the opinion of the people
regarding a penitentiary sentence, and its consequences to the
convict himself. The counsel for the government had labored
hard to convince the Court that it was the "hard labor" clause
alone that made the punishment infamous. Mr. Storrs contended
that there were other consequences involved in the sentence
besides hard labor. It involved the cropping of the hair, the
wearing of prison garb, coarse food, and close confinement, as
well as hard labor. It might also involve the sundering of the
marital relations, for imprisonment in the penitentiary is made
by the laws of Illinois a ground for divorce, and it also involved
the disfranchisement of the convict under the election laws. But
as to the matter of hard labor, Mr. Storrs showed that, by
operation of law, every sentence to the penitentiary included hard
labor, whether the words were inserted in the mittimus or not.
Judge Gray had said, in the case already referred to, "What
punishment shall be considered as infamous may be affected
by the changes of public opinion from one age to another. In
former times being put in the stocks was not considered as
necessarily infamous. . . But at the present day either stocks or
whipping might be thought an infamous punishment." Com
menting on this language, Mr. Storrs said:
"Now, there is no hard labor in being put in the stocks, and whipping
can hardly be called hard labor, except to the party who administers the
punishment; certainly not to the one who receives it. It is obvious that the
entire stress of the opinion is rested upon the nature of the punishment, and
that whether that punishment is or is not infamous is to be determined by
no fixed rule, but by public opinion ; and, to say that in this country and
at this time public opinion does not regard imprisonment in the penitentiary
as infamous — to say that such imprisonment does not cover the person who
suffers it with ignominy, is an abuse of terms, is a denial of a condition of
things which every open-eyed and fair-minded man knows to exist. Every
one knows perfectly well that public opinion draws a wide line of distinction
between imprisonment in the penitentiary and in the county jail, and every
one knows that that wide distinction is based not upon any consideration as
to whether the convict works in one place and is idle in the other, but
entirely upon the place where the imprisonment is had. Does it ever occur
to any person whose impression of a man is made by the fact that he is or
has been a convict in the penitentiary to inquire whether he worked or
whether he idled away his time while such convict?. The basis upon which
the ignominious character of such a man is placed is not what he did while
in the penitentiary — nobody stops to make inquiry about that — but it is
simply upon the fact that he was there as a convict at all. Nor does public
LEGALITY OF "TRIAL BY INFORMATION. 7/3
opinion to-day pause to inquire whether a particular convict just out of the
penitentiary had coarse food or fine food, whether he wore striped clothing,
or was permitted to indulge in the usual garb of the citizen. Opinions are
not based upon considerations of these fine details. A convict may be
called upon to do labor which is not hard, but which is rather agreeable
than otherwise. Is the gifted linguist in the penitentiary, whose scholarly
acquirements are put to use by the warden, less infamous in point of law or
fact than the unlearned convict who pounds stone day after day, or who is
engaged in the manufacture of shoes under contract within the walls of the
penitentiary ? And hence, we insist that it is not only a fair, but a necessary-
deduction to be drawn from this opinion, that imprisonment in the peniten
tiary is an infamous punishment, and that an infamous punishment can only
be the result of an infamous crime ; that public opinion regulates the ques
tion, and, that thus regulated, these defendants were put upon trial by
information for an infamous offense, in violation of the fundamental law of
the land.
" There is no penitentiary in the United States, I believe, where the con
victs are not subjected to hard labor, and, in the case of those statutes,
where by express terms hard labor is imposed in addition to the imprison
ment, such addition is merely declaring what the law has already declared
in every State in the United States as an incident to, and a necessary con
sequence of, imprisonment in the penitentiary. The infamy of the punish
ment consists in the fact that the doors of the penitentiary are closed upon
the man. The disgrace in public esteem and opinion is then indelibly fixed.
Such a disgrace, unless there be an intervening pardon, is perpetual; it
pursues the convict like a shadow through life ; it interferes with him ever
thereafter in all business pursuits ; it robs him of the confidence of his fel
low men. He seeks employment with hesitancy ; he secures it with diffi
culty ; for, let the convict, after his term has expired, even animated with
the purest and most honest intentions, and with all personal appearances in
his favor, seek employment, the mere suggestion in the quarter where he
thus seeks it that he has been a convict within the walls of a penitentiary,
determines his application, and no man yet, it is safe to say, has ever been
discovered who has qualified, modified or reduced his ill opinion of the
character of a man thus imprisoned because he subsequently ascertained
that, although he was in the penitentiary ten years, he never did a day's
work while he was there. The cropping of the hair is disagreeable ; it is
ignominious where it is compulsory ; it is more ignominious than the hard
labor. Indeed, about hard labor, as such, there is nothing which is not
entirely creditable, and all the ignominy which grows out of it or which
can be attached to it, results, as I have already said, from the fact that
it is compulsorily enforced in the penitentiary."
In opposition to the government theory that hard labor alone
made the punishment infamous, Mr. Storrs further illustrated his
view of the question by discussing in a humorous way some of
the other accompaniments of penitentiary discipline. The crop-
774 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
ping of the hair, for instance, was an operation to which large
numbers of men submitted voluntarily; the ignominy of the pen
itentiary cut was that it was compulsory. He insisted, amid
greajt laughter, in which Justice Harlan heartily joined, that if
the government counsel's theory were correct, not a bald-headed
man in the community could ever be convicted of an infamous
crime, because to that extent at least the penitentiary discipline
could have no terrors for him. As to the striped suit, he said
it was a matter of taste with a good many "dudes" to wear
them, and the louder the stripes the better they liked them; but
it made all the difference in the world whether the striped suit
was one of their own choosing, and worn outside of the peniten
tiary, or was the penitentiary uniform, and worn compulsorily
inside the penitentiary. He then quoted the statutes of Illinois
governing the management of Joliet penitentiary, and referred to
a correspondence which had taken place between the District
Attorney and the warden of the penitentiary on the subject.
"Let courts," he said, "be silent while the warden speaks. This warden,
in reply to the letter addressed to him by the District Attorney, states that,
under such a sentence as Mr. Tuthill has copied into his letter, the
prisoners to whom it refers will not be subjected to hard labor while serving
out their sentences. We are fortunate in one respect, in the disclosure of
this correspondence, for it demonstrates the fact that the period has arrived,
and the time is full upon us, when the warden of the penitentiary at Joliet
stands greatly in need of discipline. This warden has no right whatever to
give any directions as to the discipline, government, reformatory measures
or treatment of the convicts in that penitentiary. All those questions are
determined exclusively by the commissioners, and the only duty which the
warden has to perform in that connection is to see to it that their directions
are strictly enforced, and his opinions have not the slightest weight in the
matter. It is astonishing to note the very positive conclusion which the
District Attorney draws from this extraordinary correspondence. To his
mind the warden of the penitentiary has settled this grave question of law.
Had the warden been absent the deputy warden would probably have
spoken for him, and, had they both been absent, the question doubtless
would have been referred to the chaplain. I do not need, nor is this court,
I venture to say, especially anxious to be enlightened by the opinion of the
warden of the penitentiary upon a legal question — one which involves the
interpretation of the statutes of this State. It is 'quite possible that this
warden has steadily failed in the performance of his duties; that he has
failed to carry out the rules and regulations established under and by the
authority of law. As to what, as a matter of fact, his conduct has been in
that direction, ^e knows better than I know, but I think I do know, that
if he has failed to enforce these rules and regulations, he has been exceed-
LEGALITY OF "TRIAL BY INFORMATION." 7/5
ingly remiss in the performance of his duties ; has violated the law and
deserves immediate correction. He tells us what the duty of the authorities
of the institution is. I decline to seek information on such a question from
such a quarter. The statutes of the State of Illinois define the duties of the
authorities of that institution, which this court is quite capable of reading
and abundantly able of comprehending and interpreting without the assis
tance of a jailer or a warden, a bailiff or a chaplain. The District Attorney,"
he continued, "could have had better information by consulting the statutes
of the State of Illinois. He did not need to write a letter to them ; I have
no doubt he has them in his own office. I must repeat that I prefer to
take my law from some source more authoritative and commanding than
the warden of the Joliet penitentiary. It satisfies the District Attorney, but
it does not convince me. The warden has decided that the discipline of
the Joliet penitentiary does not and cannot subject convicts from the United
States courts in cases like the present to hard labor. With due submission
I think it can. I am still of the opinion, that should the commissioners for
the specifically declared purpose of discipline alone, require by rule and
regulations of their own making, that every convict there imprisoned should
be employed at hard labor every day, Sunday excepted, that such rules and
regulations would be within the range of their legal powers, and that the
warden would be compelled to change his views of the law, and diligently
see to it that those rules and regulations were faithfully enforced."
He concluded his argument on this point by saying that he
considered it unnecessary to follow counsel into the regions of
lexicography, although it would be safe even to do that. Max
Miiller had called dictionaries "the grave of language."
"The meaning which is generally attached to the word 'infamous' is,
under our modern and enlightened system of jurisprudence, precisely the
meaning which the courts will attach to it, and that an offense is infamous
which renders its perpetrator ignominious in the eyes of mankind is so clear
a proposition — so wise and so just, that we can safely adopt it, and no
harm, we may be sure, will come from its adoption. The beneficent spirit
of our laws — of the organic laws of the nation — subjects a man to no trial
and to no punishment which blackens his name, envelopes his character in
ignominy and degrades his family, unless the charge upon which he is
tried has been based upon legal evidence, and not merely upon the infor
mation which any officer of the government may claim to possess. No
supposed public emergencies are sufficient in their character to justify us in
losing sight for a moment of these substantial safeguards to the liberty of
the citizen.
"The counsel for the government have all conveniently overlooked
another most important feature of this remarkable prosecution, — that the
information upon which it proceeded was in form a violation of every prece
dent known to the history of the common law. This information stands
alone — on a bad eminence of information and belief. Under the laws, there
is in all this country no man so humble, none so degraded, as to be sub-
776 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
jected to such a trial as that through which these defendants have passed,
upon a charge preferred by an unofficial citizen, and based solely and
exclusively upon information and belief. So serious are these questions that
the offense of disregarding a solemn mandate of the constitution is as great
as the one with which these defendants are charged."
Mr. Storrs' peroration was a masterpiece of grave and impres
sive eloquence, bringing to a triumphant close one of the ablest
arguments ever heard in a Chicago court:
" It is, on the whole, a matter of solid congratulation that the government
of this country is not conducted by volunteer organizations of citizens, how
ever worthy they may be. It is a matter for sincere congratulation that the
laws are not enforced, nor declared, nor enacted, nor is justice administered
by committees. These committees are purely volunteer organizations, and
it is not at all rarely the case that their zeal runs away with their discretion.
"If it should be deemed at air necessary for the purposes of this discus
sion, I can join most heartily with the learned counsel for the government
in denunciation of crimes and offenses against the purity of the ballot. I
think I esteem the preservation of the largest liberty of the suffrage and the
purity of the ballot as highly as they, and I know that I have regarded
wholesale outrages upon the right of suffrage, involving the practical dis-
franchisement of majorities in entire States with much more apprehension
and with much greater abhorrence than has been entertained by many of
the very excellent gentlemen constituting the Chicago committee of Public
Safety. But of whatever crime a man may be charged, as a lawyer and as
a citizen I must still contend that he be tried according to the forms of law,
and I am not so hopeless of the capacity of the average American citizen
for self-government as to believe that crimes cannot be punished except
through violation of fundamental legal principles. I believe that the whole
social and legal edifice may be maintained, each and every part in its
integrity; for to enforce one law it is not necessary that we should violate
another. The laws were made for all, to benefit all, to be obeyed by all;
to be obeyed and regarded by the courts as well as by the humblest citizen ;
and aggregations of citizens, no matter how numerous nor how respectable
nor how influential they may be, have no more right to redress one wrong
by the commission of another than has the humblest, poorest citizen in the
land. Believing confidently that in this case fundamental principles most
"essential to the protection of the liberty of the citizen have been violated, —
confidently believing that the Constitution of the United States in one of its
most vital features has been disregarded, — I insist upon it that the dethroned
Constitution shall be enthroned, and that to do this no crime need go
unpunished, and no substantial right, either of a public or private character,
go unvindicated."
The result of this discussion was a disagreement- of the court,
and a certification to the Supreme Court of the United States of
the points of disagreement, the two most important being the
LEGALITY OF "TRIAL BY INFORMATION. ?7/
jurisdiction of the Federal court in the premises, and the legality
of trial in such a case by way of information.
In the meantime, Mackin had been investigated by a special
grand jury of Cook county, for an offence against the State law,
grounded upon the same facts that had been brought out in evi
dence before Judge Blodgett. He was subpoenaed to appear
before this grand jury, and instead of refusing to answer the
questions put to him, which he had a right to do, gave evasive
and tricky answers, whereupon the grand jury returned an indict
ment against him for perjury. Mr. Storrs was retained to defend
him on this charge. The Chicago newspapers had raised such
a clamor about the possibility of Mackin's escape from punish
ment in the Federal court, that the State's attorney, although a
Democrat himself, felt bound to use his utmost efforts to satisfy
public clamor by securing a conviction under the State laws, and
with this end in view a special grand jury was organized, all
inspired by the same patriotic feeling, who at once returned
indictments against Mackin not only for his offence against the
ballot, but tripped him up on his own evidence before them,
and indicted him for perjury. The State's Attorney proved
two sets of facts on the trial of this case. The official steno
grapher read over his notes of what Mackin had actually
testified to before the grand jury. Members of the grand
jury were called to swear to their recollections of what he had
sworn to, and their testimony was far stronger, being colored
by their impressions, than the actual record. Mackin had
sworn that he did not order the printing of the bogus ballots
from "the Wrights." The two brothers Wright were placed
on the witness stand, and the one with whom Mackin had
had his negotiations testified to that fact, while the other tes
tified that he had had no dealings with Mackin at all, but
took his orders from his brother. The exasperated state of
public opinion, goaded on by the fear that the proceedings
in the Federal Court might ultimately be set aside, demanded
Mackin's conviction on the perjury charge, and he was duly
convicted, the jury awarding him the severe sentence of five
year's imprisonment in the penitentiary.
It now became Mr. Storrs' duty to use all efforts to save his
client from the doom to which the pressure of outside opinion
LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
had consigned him; and no lawyer ever devoted himself with
more thorough earnestness and self-sacrifice to this end than he
did. In the boiling heat of the dog-days, he journeyed into
Southern Illinois to lay the case before a Justice of the Supreme
Court whom he hoped to find uninfluenced by Chicago news
paper clamor. Judge Shope had just been elected to fill a vacancy,
and being the youngest Judge on the Supreme bench, was averse
to taking the sole responsibility of the hearing, but consented to
sit with Chief Justice Craig at Galesburg to hear the application
for a supersedeas. Accordingly, the hearing of the motion was
had at Judge Craig's house. Mr. Starrs presented his points
with his usual skill and ability, and the Judges came to a com
promise decision, granting the supersedeas, but declining to admit
Mackin to bail.
In the effort to save Mackin from the penitentiary, Mr. Storrs
sacrificed his own life. The appeal was argued by him at the
September term of the Supreme Court held at Ottawa, and Mr.
Storrs, who was then suffering from the attack of pleurisy which
terminated fatally, said in the course of his opening remarks that
this was probably the last occasion upon which he would deliver
an argument before that court. It proved to be the last.
Mr. Storrs took exception to the organization of the special
grand jury by whom the indictments against Mackin had been
found. The statute, he said, contemplated the calling of special
grand juries on occasions of public emergency in rural counties,
where there were usually not more than two terms of court in a
year, and was never intended to supersede the ordinary method
of calling grand juries. At the time this special grand jury was
called, a regular grand jury was in session, and no public emer
gency required or justified the calling of a special grand jury to
deal with these election cases. Again, Mackin had been compelled
to attend before this grand jury on a subpoena, so that he might
be convicted out of his own mouth. He was present before them
without counsel, and the direct question was put to him whether
he ordered the printing of the spurious ballots. Wright, Thomp
son, and Fries had already testified that he did.
" His situation, it must be remembered, was different from what it would
have been before a petit jury in a trial in open court. He would there
have been cautioned, and, moreover, on a trial before a petit jury, his
presence upon the stand as a witness against himself, even by silence or
by direct admission could not have been enforced.
LEGALITY OF "TRIAL BY INFORMATION.
|
"So, the situation is simply this: Compelled to appear, examined in
secret — had he admitted that he had ordered these ballots and received
them after they were pointed and engraved, he is forthwith indicted upon
his own testimony. Does he refuse to answer on the ground that it crimi
nates himself — this is also sufficient ground for indicting him, from his
silence. And, does he deny it, then he is indicted for perjury. Thus there
is no escape, and there is no doctrine of good morals and common justice
to which the principle resorted to in this extraordinary case was not
obnoxious.
"I have not been able to find express adjudications upon this point, but
the reasoning is so strong that perhaps express adjudications are unnecessary.
A case on all fours with the present one occured in Chicago a few years
since, and was decided by one of the most distinguished judges among our
local judiciary — Judge Gary.
"A special grand jury were investigating the general subject of gambling
houses, as they claimed, and having subpoenaed some parties before them,
two or three parties testified that they had received money from Michael C.
McDonald, that he had paid the rent of certain premises, etc.; testimony
sufficiently cogent to show that McDonald was interested in the gaming
houses; whereupon, in order to make matters doubly sure, this sapient
special grand jury summoned McDonald and called his attention to the
testimony of those witnesses, and McDonald denied them point blank.
Whereupon, the grand jury, failing to have convicted McDonald out of his
own mouth, indicted him for perjury, and called the witnesses who had
appeared before them upon the trial of the indictment for perjury, as wit
nesses against him. The case had proceeded far enough to show its exact
situation, when Judge Gary cut all argument and debate short by refusing
to entertain it, and instructed the petit jury before whom the case was on
trial that no man could be subjected to a trial under those conditions, and
he would not permit it and that they must return a verdict for the defend
ant, which they did.
"The case has not been reported, but it is a ruling by one of the most
able and one of the most fearless of our judges. It is in point, and is
entitled to fully as much weight as the ruling of Judge Moran in the present
case in refusing the instruction presenting that precise question."
On the trial before Judge Moran, Mr. Storrs had offered an
instruction to the effect that if Mackin's testimony was different
from that set forth in the indictment, even though such testimony
were false, he could not be convicted under that indictment.
This instruction was refused, and Mr. Storrs elaborated the point
before the Supreme Court that the variance between the state
ments set forth in the indictment and the statements actually
proved by the evidence was fatal to a conviction. Several other
instructions for the defendant were refused, which Mr. Storrs con
tended ought to have been given. A juror named Gray was
/8O LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
found, after the trial and conviction of Mackin for perjury, to
have been eccentric in his conduct, so much so that some of his
neighbors thought him insane, and this was also presented by
Mr. Storrs as a reason for granting a new trial.
The decision of the Supreme Court was not given until several
months after Mr. Storrs' death, and it was, as everybody expected,
adverse to Mackin. He was at once removed to Joliet peniten
tiary to serve out his sentence, and he is there now, not in
vindication of the purity of the ballot box, but for .constructive
perjury.
The point made by Mr. Storrs as to the legality of trial
by information in the case of an infamous crime was sustained
by the Supreme Court of the United States in the spring of
1886, and thus the accomplices of Mackin in the great fraud
in the 1 8th ward are to-day free men, no further steps having
been taken against them, and Colonel Tuthill having resigned
his office has been succeeded by a Democrat. Gleason was
never called up for sentence, and has profited by the exertions
of Mackin's counsel to the extent of escaping punishment
altogether. The purity of the ballot-box has not been vindi
cated, but so long as the arch-conspirator has met with
punishment, and been laid aside for a time from further
interference in Chicago elections, the community seems for the
present content.
?^/#frz.
&T^ ^L.
^£.
*^-»— ~,
-Jr~
7
CHAPTER XLIV.
THREE MONTHS IN EUROPE.
ROSY DESCRIPTIONS OF EXPERIENCES ABROAD — MODEL LETTERS FROM A
TRAVELER — IMPRESSIONS OF LIVERPOOL, LONDON, EDINBURGH, AND OTHER
POINTS OF INTEREST— FEATURES OF FOREIGN CHARACTER NOT USUALLY
NOTICED — A BIT OF BUSINESS WITH PLEASURE.
IN the summer of 1882, ^r. Storrs gratified a desire which
had been carried in his heart since boyhood, to see the Old
World. It was no easy matter to lay down the burden of home
duties, but he was in absolute need of rest, his physicians
advised it, and, then, an element of wealthy packers of the West
urged him to go in the belief that he might, if only by personal
advocacy, secure more earnest effort on the part of the American
representatives abroad to remove the restrictions imposed by cer
tain foreign governments upon the shipments of American live
stock and the importation of American meats. With this excuse
of business, Mr. Storrs indulged in the pleasure, and, equipped
with letters from General Grant, President Arthur, Secretary of
State Frelinghuysen, and from various influential, social, loyal
and mercantile representatives, his journey was a notable one.
In after days, Mr. Storrs was wont to speak of his limited trip
abroad as a dream, without a single sorrow to alloy. During
his absence, he contributed occasional letters to the Chicago
Tribune in which he told in a graphic and breezy way of his
experiences and impressions. He possessed a natural power for
vivid pen pictures, and as an editorial allusion to one of his
letters remarked " from the flood of tender recollections called up
by the ivy-clad battlements of Windsor castle, Mr. Storrs skips
with delightful airiness to some reflections becoming the admi-
/82 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
rably developed ankles of a young lady who appeared upon the
stage of a London theatre; and amid the solemnity of Shakes
peare's burial-place he does not forget to mention that the tree
under which the Bard of Avon once slept off the effects of too
much wine is still shown to visitors." The practical remarks
upon persons and places, the vein of humor, and the beauties of
many of his reflections, are delightfully commingled in these
newspaper dashings. To any reader they must be interesting,
and to the one who may have grown familiar with most of the
spots described, these samples of his letters will be welcome.
"I have deferred the fulfillment of my promise," he wrote, from the
Grand Hotel, London, July 31, "to write back my impression received
from this my first trip across the ocean — a promise to record things, not
necessarily as they had before been recorded, but precisely as they
appeared to me, until my stay in England was completed.
"I have been in England now three weeks, leaving to-morrow morning
for Scotland, and while I am aware of the fact that in so short a time no
observations except those of a most superficial character could possibly be
made, yet some impressions have been teft upon my mind during this visit
so pleasurably clear and distinct that I doubt much whether the most pro
tracted stay would change them. Our voyage in the good ship Baltic,
leaving New York on the 1st of July at 5 o'clock in the morning, was a
delightfully pleasant but otherwise uneventful one. I apprehended for
myself all the horrors of seasickness during the entire voyage. I had made
ample preparations for it. A very hearty dinner the night before starting
followed by a supper at 11 o'clock, then the start for the steamer about half-
past 3 in the morning and a cigar before breakfast. It seemed to me to
insure seasickness and make any other result impossible.
"A nasty drizzling fog hung over the ship as we reached it; a feeling
of discomfort seemed to pervade all around. Promptly at 5 o'clock we left
the docks, and I at once called together all the stewards of high and low
degree about the ship, whom the guide-books had instructed me it was
necessary to fee, and told them I desired to fee them at once, as in thirty
minutes I should be utterly useless and prostrate. I admonished them all
that whatever attention a sick and thoroughly wretched man might need I
desired, for I anticipated seeing nothing of the ocean or decks for myself.
I invoked for myself their kindest and most sympathetic attention. The
fees thus paid in advance seemed satisfactory, and I received the most
hearty assurance that everything would be done that could be done, not to
make me comfortable, for that we all supposed would be impossible, but
to reduce my discomfort to the lowest possible minimum. I remained on
deck,, watched the fog and the receding shores of the bar and lower bay,
watched the shores as we passed Sandy Hook, watched the waters carefully
and narrowly as we passed on into the open sea ; saw the pilot leave the
ship and turn back in the pilot boat homewards ; made anxious inquiries
THREE MONTHS IN EUROPE. 783
of old navigators as to the exact time when the sea might be expected to
be rough, and patiently awaited the dreadful nausea of seasickness, which
thirty years ago I had experienced on Lake Erie.
"The minutes went by and the hours passed, and the ship rolled some
what and my disappointment grew and grew, and continued to grow. I
was not seasick.
" Presently, about six hours after our departure, the unmistakable signs
came, and in the midst of a discussion on Pennsylvania politics — a subject
in itself sufficient to make any one seasick — I withdrew from the deck,
made an instantaneous settlement with Neptune, experienced a sudden
relief, and returned 'clothed and in my right mind,1 not having been absent
from the deck five minutes, and from that time forward throughout every
hour of the day was perhaps one of the most able-bodied and one of the
hungriest men on that ship. I am satisfied that I am a navigator, and
shall be satisfied that I am one until I cross the channel, which I propose
doing next week, or until I start for home, which I intend doing on the
7th of October.
"We had been assured that on our arrival at Liverpool that city
would present a most disappointing appearance ; that it was dirty, gloomy,
and forbidding ; that the hotels were execrable, and that we should be
anxious to hurry straight through it; that its streets were narrow and dark,
and that everything about it was unfavorable.
"It is possible that we reached Liverpool under most fortunate circum
stances, but all along from the pier beside which our ship anchored the
shores were lined with beautiful cottages, the fields were green and charm
ing, and Liverpool itself quite a different city from that which it had been
represented to be. I have omitted to mention the eagerness and delight
with which we first saw the Irish coast. My vision failed me, however,
and while the coast is very beautiful it was not to my eyes green. Every
body said it was green, and when I began to reason that it did not look
so, I was told that it was really green, but did not appear so because the
sun was not shining upon it from the proper direction. I presume there
fore it is green, and that at a season when the sun is doing proper duty to
the Irish coast it would appear the proper color to me. We reached Liver
pool, having no trouble whatever with our luggage, and drove directly to
our hotel, the Adelphi. The streets were broad and clean, the buildings
fine, the day bright, the rooms at the Adelphi large and comfortable, the
service all that could be desired, and the attendance excellent, everything
home-like and most cheering to one who had just closed a voyage across
the Atlantic. That afternoon we drove about the city and found its sur
roundings very beautiful. Prince's Park is a series of most lovely land
scape pictures, and we have nothing finer in our country.
"A few of the public buildings are extremely fine. St. George's Hall is
a magnificent structure both inside and out, and the great lions cast in
bronze and the collossal statues of the Queen and the Prince Consort, the
monument of the Duke of Wellington, and the public buildings surround
ing that square are very handsome.
784 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
"We decided not to hurry through Liverpool, but to remain a night, and
took train the next day to the old, old city of Chester, reaching there about
midday and stopping at an elegant hotel built by, and the property of, the
Duke of Westminster. I cannot take the time to describe Chester, which
has already been done again and again, and to much better advantage
than I could possibly do it. There are old buildings way back into Queen
Anne's time, quaint, curious, and in their way beautiful. There are the
narrow, winding streets of the olden time. There are portions, and quite
large portions, of the old Roman wall, 1,800 years old. There are still
standing old towers which run way back centuries, covered with moss and
ivy. There is a beautiful river, and the Castle of the Duke of Edinburgh
which is used as a military depot.
"Thence we drove to Eaton Hall, one of the seats of the .Duke of West
minster, through magnificent grounds, the like of which, as private grounds,
cannot be seen in America. The hall itself is a splendid structure, and the
view from it, over the smooth, velvet lawns, through the great clumps of
trees and the river shining just beyond, is most beautiful. The next morn
ing we started for London, but in the meantime I had the pleasure of meeting
the American Consul at Liverpool, Governor Packard, and General Merritt, the
Consul-General at London, who was there awaiting the arrival of his son
on the Alaska. On all hands I heard the highest encomiums of Governor
Packard, and the fidelity with which he watches and guards the interests of
our people. I was fortunate enough to secure what the English call a car
riage for my little party, consisting of my wife, Miss Brittan, and myself,
over the Northwestern Road to London, and under such favorable circum
stances, having the carriage exclusively to ourselves, I cannot imagine a
railway trip more enjoyable. All along through that 200 miles were the
most delightful landscapes, smiling fields, and forests of the deepest and
richest green — cabinet-pictures of landscape which to the American eye are
very captivating.
"Leaving Liverpool at 10 a. m., we reached London at 4 o'clock in the
afternoon, drove at once to the hotel Continental, where we had temporarily
secured rooms (the Grand Hotel being then crowded), and so soon as it
was possible hastened to see what we could that afternoon of London,
driving in Hyde Park, the beauties of which I shall refer to more fully
hereafter. Returning to the hotel, and still anxious to see something more
with the eagerness of a first visit, we went to the St. James' Theatre, where
a charming little play, 'The Squire,' was being performed for the hundred
and something time. I am sure that when Mrs. Kendall, the leading lady
in the piece, visits America our people will be delighted with her, her act
ing is so smooth, easy, and natural. Her reading is perfect. The next
day we visited the Tower. I was not disappointed in the Tower, but it
was quite different from what I had expected to see. I had carried in my
mind, though I had no reason for so doing, the idea of a great, lofty, single
tower; such is not however the Tower of London. It is a series of not
very lofty towers, occupying different portions of what in its time was a
very extended fortification or citadel. I had not thought of it as a fort,
THREE MONTHS IN EUROPE.
*
which it in fact is — useless to-day, certainly, as such, but at the time it
was built practically impregnable doubtless, but it is full of history of the
saddest and most tragic character. Portions of it run way back to the
earliest days of English history. We saw the tower in which Anne Boleyn,
Sir Walter Raleigh, Essex, and Lady Jane Grey, and countless other
unfortunates of such times, were imprisoned. We saw the passages, gloomy
and dark, through which Anne Boleyn was conveyed to the place of her
execution ; we saw the dark and frowning entrance called the Traitor's Gate,
through which State prisoners were brought by way of the river ; we saw
and trod upon the stairs under which the Princes were murdered ; we saw
a collection of armor worn by the old Knights of warlike and bloody-
times ; we walked over passage-ways which English Princes and noblemen
had trod many a weary hour, and we could not feel otherwise than impressed
with the sombre, savage, cruel gloom of the place and its surroundings.
" But a little distance from the Tower itself is Tower Hill, where State
prisoners were gibbeted and beheaded, and all around, could the ground
speak, it would be eloquent with the history of those bloody and cruel
times we sometimes hear spoken of as the 'good old days' — happily long
since passed away. In some respects the so-called Jewel-Room is the most
attractive part of the Tower, for there are kept the crown jewels of Great
Britain — the crowns worn by Kings hundreds of years ago, gold and ivory
staves and sceptres which they had borne ; golden cups out of which they
drank, and huge golden bowls in which their punch was brewed ; their
spears and their shields ; the golden maces and wands borne before the
Kings and Queens — all these in glass cases are displayed in glittering
bewilderment.
"I think no one can visit the Tower of London, who is at all familiar
with English history, without leaving it with a certain feeling of depression.
There is so much of tragedy and pathos in its annals that it seems to be
in the very air of the Tower and the surrounding neighborhood. You take
that feeling as you would a disease in the malarious atmosphere, and you
drive away still and sad, and wondering that such things could ever be.
Reaching our hotel it was evident something must be done to change the
mood in which the Tower had left us. No change could be greater than
that from the Tower to Rotten Row and Hyde Park ; the former of which
was in the afternoon crowded with splendid equipages, among which we
drove up and down, around and about the park, and to the memorial
statue to the Prince Consort, erected by the Queen, a glittering, gilded,
splendid tribute. In the evening we saw 'Patience' at the Savoy Theatre,
where this opera was first presented and is still running.
"The next day we visited Westminster Abbey, and that exceeded our
highest expectations of it. Something of this was due doubtless to the
fortunate time we visited it. The chorus of boys was chanting the service,
and their smooth, sweet voices seemed to float through the great abbey,
and was a most fitting prelude to our visit. The service finished, we spent
these delightful hours in the abbey, and such a multitude of magnificent
monuments of the great and small, good and bad of England's history.
50
786 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
*
"The Poet's Corner has been written threadbare, but he must be very
dull indeed who visiting it would not feel deeply impressed by all that he
saw above, beneath, and about him. Perhaps the most attractive portion
of the abbey is the old chapel of Henry VII., and before we enter it, on
the right side and on the left respectively, were little rooms containing the
monuments or marble effigies of Queen Elizabeth and Mary Queen of
Scots. The face of Mary has a pinched, narrow look, but that of Eliza
beth is wonderfully effective ; it has all the hard, strong-willed, cruel lines
characteristic of her race, and as one gazes upon it one cannot fail to read
the history of that marvelous woman. The chapel itself is famed for its
wonderful roof — so light, so exquisitely airy that it seems impossible to carve
in stone, lines and threads so delicate as those which seem to float above
us.
" Leaving this wonderful chapel we find the old tombs of England's
Kings, and as our journey is nearly finished come to the tomb of Edward
the Confessor, more than 800 years old, and the old worn clumsy chair in
which England's monarchs for hundreds of years have sat during the cere
mony of their coronation.
"One visit to Westminster Abbey is very unsatisfying — portions of it are
so old, some being at least a thousand years of age. Outside and in it is
so curious, so beautiful, that to visit it once is simply to create a desire to
pay another visit, which we did again, and again, and again. . . .
"The vastness of London, the multitude of places which one desires to
visit, oppresses any one whose time is limited. After having visited the
Tower, Westminster Abbey, and the Parliament Houses, we spent a few-
hours in the national art gallery. I make no pretensions to being a judge
of pictures, but was delighted with the Turner collection exhibited there,
at the great pictures of Claude, and impressed with the sumptuous splendor
of some of the old paintings of Paul Veronisi. It seemed to me that it
would be difficult to gather a more complete representation of all schools
of art than can there be found, and I, feeling myself quite incompetent to
pass an opinion of the general merits of the collection, inquired of our Min
ister, Mr. Lowell, who gave it as his opinion that nowhere in Europe was
there a more valuable collection of pictures, one more comprehensive and
thoroughly representative in its character, than in the National Art Gallery.
There are at least half a dozen, of Turner's pictures which I think would
impress any one — two great landscapes which he contributed to the gallery
on the stipulation that they should be hung side by side with two celebrated
pictures of Claude, of wonderful atmospheric effects. ' The Fighting Temer-
aire' seemed to me all that was claimed for it, and at least one of his
'Venetian Sunsets' was splendor itself.
"We next visited the British Museum. Its wonders I will not attempt
to describe ; they are endless and bewildering. Its collection of autographs
and letters of almost every distinguished man and woman who has figured
in either English or Continental history for the last 500 years seems to be
complete. The last letter poor Dickens wrote is there. Milton, Oliver
Cromwell, the genuine signature of Shakspeare, the contract for the sale
THREE MONTHS IN EUROPE. 787
of 'Paradise Lost,' Henry VIII. 's autograph, Queen Elizabeth's, Cranmer's,
and multitudes of names that stand out in this world's history are there.
In this museum are collected the Elgin marbles, friezes taken from the
Parthenon at Athens, a splendid collection of Greek, Roman, and Egyptian
sculpture, which it would require months to critically examine and thor
oughly appreciate, but at which we could merely glance. The jewel-room
contains a wonderful collection of all forms of art in bronze and other met
als, and the famous Portland vase, of the beauty of which no engraving
could give any adequate idea. The reading-room is said to be the finest
room in the world. The library is simply huge. The wonders of this place
are so vast that it is impossible for me even to attempt to describe them.
The criticism to be passed is that it is comprehensive in its extent and in
its variety.
"One day of sight-seeing was devoted to what is called the City, and
this included St. Paul's Cathedral, the Bank of England, the Guildhall, the
Mansion House, and the General Post-Office, all in their way magnificent
structures.
" From no point, however, can St. Paul's Cathedral be seen to advant
age. Its interior is described in the guide-books as cold, dark, and cheer
less, but to me it appeared quite othenvise. Looking up the wonderful
dome it seemed so airy, and springing, and light in its character, the whole
interior so beautifully graceful in design and proportions, that I do not
wonder that it is ranked second among the great cathedrals of the world.
About the cathedral are distributed monuments of England's departed
heroes. Here lies buried Oliver Goldsmith, and in a crypt below is the
sarcophagus of Wellington, the enormous hearse in which were borne his
remains. The wheels of this hearse were made from cannon captured by
him in battle, and it is a massive structure in all, solid and impressive
looking, like the military idol of the English people, the Iron Duke himself.
Here, too, is the sarcophagus of Nelson, whose monuments, by the way,
adorn many a square in London. Old banners bearing the marks of many
battles, smeared with smoke and the dust of many years, all these are
gathered in England's great cathedral.
"It seemed our duty to visit Windsor Castle, which we did, and upon
reaching it we found we had formed altogether a wrong impression as to
what Windsor Castle really was. It is not only a residence of royalty, but
a huge fortress, portions of which run way back before the Conquest by the
Normans. Great towers frown on high steeps surrounded by deep moats ;
the main tower, elevated on its rocky height, clothed with ivy, stands there
in such grand repose and solidity and splendor as to fittingly represent the
greatness and power of Old England. The various towers I shall not under
take to describe. Some of them run back more than 700 years ago, and,
as I stood in the stone-paved gateway o'f one of these towers built before
the Conquest, up among its ivy-clad battlements the birds were singing ;
around the old gates, which aforetime were closed against the invader,
flowers were growing. Here were old walls which had seen the strifes of
more than 500 years ago, silent and passed into history, clad with smiling
\
788 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
verdure and made vocal with the music of singing birds. Here for a por
tion of the year the Queen resides. She had left but a few days before
our visit, and her private apartments were closed, but here was the old
chapel, built many years ago, in which royal marriages have been solemn
ized. This chapel has been restored and decorated by the Queen, a mem
orial part of which is dedicated to the memory of the Prince Consort. This
memorial chapel is surpassingly beautiful. Its walls are made of many-
colored marbles exceedingly rich in design. At the end is a reclining statue
of the Prince Consort, splendid in marbles and gilding, in painted glass
and stained windows. This chapel furnishes another evidence of the
Queen's loyal devotion to her wise and patriotic husband. There was in
the character of the Prince Consort nothing we would call brilliant, but the
position which he occupied was a most delicate one. The English people
were most sensitive of any interference by him with their politics, and he
conducted himself so wisely and becomingly, was such a considerate patron
of arts and sciences, contributed so much to their cultivation and that of
all worthy peaceful pursuits in England that his memory is held in affect
ionate regard by all Englishmen.
"The portion of the castle occupied by the Queen is cold and sombre in
appearance, but it looks out upon the most beautiful landscape. In front
of her windows is the 'Long Walk,' a splendid drive three miles in length,
lined on either side by great elms, and which goes along straight to the
splendid statue of George III. Driving down this long avenue, and reach
ing the end, we turned to the left, and passing through lovely wooded
landscapes until we reached the point in these wonderfully extensive grounds
so justly celebrated, known as Virginia Water. This is an artificial lake
conceived by George the Fourth,' and many miles in extent; the shores are
most charming, about them are many villas, and these shores on holidays
are thronged with thousands of visitors. We passed there on our return to
Windsor. Our guide points out to us an old propped-up tree, as the fam
ous Herne's oak. This is over 700 years old and is rapidly falling to decay.
Herds of deer are in the park and wild flowers blossom on the roadway.
Every turn in the road furnished fresh views of the wonderfully beautiful
country about us, until we returned to the old town and the castle was
again before us.
"But the real Mecca of the American in England we had not visited —
Leamington, Warwick Castle, Stratford-on-Avon, Kenilworth, Coventry, and
Guy's Cliff. Taking the morning train we reached beautiful Leamingion a
little after midday, stopping at the Manor House Hotel — unlike anything of
the kind I have ever seen in America. A beautiful house far back from
the road, surrounded by gravel walks, beds of flowers, and by a beautiful
park many acres in extent, lakes and woodlands. This was the Manor
House Hotel to which Mr. Gillig had been good enough to recommend me.
We were met by the hostess, as all the visitors there are met, as if we
were private guests — a smiling, pleasant-faced Englishwoman, and after a
hearty luncheon, for which our ride had fitted us, we took an open car
riage and started for our evening's tour — and such a tour! But a few min-
THREE MONTHS IN EUROPE. 789
utes' drive from the Manor House we came to the River Avon, and stop
ping midway on the bridge which crosses it, directly in front of us rising
on its rocky steeps was the famous Warwick Castle. We have all seen
engravings of this wonderful building and ruin from every point of view,
but no engraving does it justice, nor is it possible for an engraving to do
it justice. Vast in its extent, beautiful in its architecture, old and moss-
grown, and battlemented, it is as if the old feudal times, armored and
helmeted, had stepped boldly out of history and stood before us. Reaching
the castle we were shown through its rooms, wonderfully rich in art and
historical treasures, with its armor worn by old Knights, its windows look
ing out upon the peaceful Avon, in which stand the remains of old bridges
built by the Romans. Its towers clasped in the arms of huge cedars of
Lebanon painted by the Crusaders, its frowning battlements covered with
ivy and moss, here indeed was a fit place for the stout old Earl. Its
treasures of buhl, tables of precious stones, and Limoges-ware, all the world
is familiar with.
"One little plate was shown to us which was valued at $20,000. Three
small cabinets of this ware, containing not twenty pieces in all, were said
to be worth at least $150,000. The rooms were hung with pictures by
Veronisi, Claude, Rubens, Teniers, Titian, Raphael, Canoletti, and Vandyck,
and at the end of one of the passage ways made through these enormous
walls of stone, nearly ten feet in thickness, hung one of the three famous
original portraits of Charles I. on horseback, painted by Vandyck.
"The whole country about the castle is a 'garden. Leaving it because
we could not do anything more, we proceeded towards Stratford-on-Avon,
and reaching there drove direct through the town to Anne Hathaway 's
cottage ; and there the cottage was, made sacred and so pathetic because
the simple girl lived there whom Shakspeare for a short time loved. This
humble little cottage is covered all over with vines and flowering shrubs.
A delightful old lady has charge of it — said to be a descendant of poor
Anne Hathaway. She showed us by the great fire-place the settle, as she
called it, now so old and worn, upon which Shakspeare and Anne
sat those long years ago. The room which Anne Hathaway occupied,
the windows out of which she looked, the door through which Shakspeare
entered when he called to see her, all these are there. It is so tender in
all its suggestions, so gentle, so pathetic in the impressions which it leaves,
that we asked the good old dame to give us a drink of water from the
well from the garden where Anne Hathaway once plucked flowers, and to
give us as souvenirs of our visit some flowers from the shrubs that were
clinging to the walls of the old cottage. These we bore away with us and
returned to Stratford; visited the old church where the great poet is buried,
and thence to the house where he was born. The barbarian Smiths,
Joneses, and Robinsons had in years gone by disfigured the walls by
scribbling their names upon them, but there the old house stands, and
there was the room in which Shakspeare was born. Two old maiden
ladies, apparently thoroughly posted in Shakspearean literature, were there
as custodians of this sacred spot. The room in which Shakspeare was
79O LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
born is not much of a room to look at. The old beams are there still, the
old walls are there, and the old stone floor is there. It is not, as I have
said, much of a room to look at, but I defy any one to remain there long
without being greatly impressed by the sacredness of the spot in which he
is. Connected with the house is a museum, and among its curiosities are
some features at last betraying something human. They showed us the
picture of the place where Shakspeare got drunk — as a natural sequence
they showed us the picture of the apple-tree under which he fell asleep and
slept off his debauch, and to complete the sequence they then showed
a piece of the tree itself. This was so natural, so human, that it
seemed as if I knew Shakspeare better than ever I had known him
before. * In the house is the famous portrait recently discovered and
bearing unmistakable marks of genuineness. The costume is the same
as that of his bust over his grave in the church; the features were the
same, and the gentleman in charge, who had none of the garrulity of
the guide about him, but appeared to be a thorough Shakspearean
scholar, said that although the genuineness of this portrait as a con
temporaneous portrait of Shakspeare cannot be established, yet the evi
dence in its favor is so strong as to satisfy even the most doubting
mind. This portrait is, to my mind, nearer like the Chandos than any
other I have seen. It is the portrait of the Shakspeare whom we have
all carried in our mind's eye, inspired, but human, the portrait of just
such a man as all lovers of Shakspeare believe their Shakspeare to have
been."
Later, he wrote from Paris, under date of September 18:
"Having seen nearly all that I shall see, and intending to devote the time
that remains of my absence from home to a leisurely contemplation of
what I have already seen, the time seems to have arrived for the fulfillment
of a promise made in my former letter to The Tribune, to narrate my
experiences and the impressions which I have received from my visit to the
Continent.
"It suits my purpose to pursue in this narrative what I may appropriately
call the chronological method ; and, pursuing that method, I have to say
that nothing has occurred since my former letter to change my opinion of
England, its cities, its scenery, and its men so far as I had the pleasure of
meeting them. My admiration of all these has rather increased by what I
have since seen ; and in no country which I have visited have I found a
healthier manhood and more genial courtesy to strangers, a kindlier or
more intelligent appreciation of our country, its institutions, and its people,
than in Great Britain.
"Immediately after writing The Tribune, I made a flying visit to Scot
land. One great regret accompanies that tour, and will always in my mind
mark it. It was all too brief, and I had but glimpses where I desired
extended views. I saw enough of Scotland, however, its scenery, its people,
its beautiful City of Edinburgh, and many of its famed historic places, to
strengthen the admiration which in some way or other had become deeply
fixed in my mind of old Scotland.
THREE MONTHS IN EUROPE. 791
" The ride from London to Edinburgh is for Great Britain a long one. It
is about twelve hours ; but so favorably were we situated with reference to
our railway accommodations over the Great Northern route, and so varied
and so beautiful was the scenery through which we passed, that the time
seemed brief enough. Reaching Edinburgh quite late, although not too late
in those northern latitudes to see the crags which seem to environ that pic
turesque city, we drove immediately to our hotel — the Windsor — where
exceedingly pleasant apartments had been reserved for us, fronting upon
Prince's street, with the old historic castle, planted upon its craggy and
rocky front, directly before us. When the morning came and we saw
clearly in the broad daylight that famed and beautiful city we did not won
der that for picturesque beauty it had attracted the admiration of all the
world. Edinburgh would be beautiful even without the splendid halo of his
tory, poetry, tragedy, and romance which surrounds it. Crowning rocky
steeps, the old city sits enthroned — every foot of its soil, and every crag
and peak, made famous in story and in song.
"4We first visited Holyrood Palace. It is a quaint, intensely interest
ing, and curious old fortress. Portions of it run back hundreds of years ;
and many of its gateways, arches, and windows are most curious and in
teresting, as exhibiting architectural features now very rare, even in old
England or Scotland. Here Queen Mary lived ; here for a time was her
home ; here were plots and counterplots ; here were dark and foul con
spiracies hatched ; here was unlicensed love-making ; and here bloody
assassinations. We saw Mary's rooms — her dressing-room, sleeping-room,
her so-calle.d state-apartments, her reception-room, and the cramped,
wretched little supper-room, so called, from which Rizzio was dragged to
meet his death. The guide pointed out to us the stony, narrow, winding
secret stairway up which Darnley and his associate conspirators passed, and
found the wretched Italian, the worthless tramp,, upon whom the much-
lamented Queen had bestowed her affections, or rather her rapid, transient
passion, supping with the Queen of Scots. The wretched little room is
hardly large enough for two — it is not large enough to accommodate a
supper for an able-bodied man — and, suddenly putting the arras aside, the
conspirators seized this poor creature, to save whom the Queen at once in
terposed, but vainly, to whose skirts the wretch clutched to save himself;
but, dragged by these strong and cruel men into the adjoining sleeping-
room, grasping the bedstead he was stabbed again and again. Dragged
through that room into a still larger one, he was left just at the head of
another stone stairway, and there bled to death. We were shown a great,
sombre, dark spot on the floor, which they told us was made by the blood
pouring from Rizzio' s wounds as he lay there dying. It may be so. But
again and again we passed over the route that he was dragged, and, if
concerning those old times there is any truth in the details of history, it is
that in that spot this fearful tragedy was enacted.
"There is but little that is attractive in Holyrood as a residence. Its
general appearance is gloomy, grizzly, and forbidding. In these days no
well-regulated woman of my aquaintance would consent to be a Queen on
79- I-IFE OF EMERY A. STORRS.
such terms as the occupancy of Holyrood Palace. We of course saw the
old court-yard, and the large hall in which are hung the large portraits of
Scottish Kings — poor portraits, but no poorer than the Kings. The record
is a dreadful one of assassinations, deaths by violence, by poison ; it makes
a fearfully gloomy history. And all those cloud-aspiring crags and peaks,
looking so solemnly down upon you — beautiful, but bare and savage in
their beauty — carry within their rocky bosoms the stories of tragedies which
make early Scottish history almost an unbroken record of violence and
bloodshed.
"Connected with Holyrood Palace, and almost forming a part of it, is
the old, decayed, ruined chapel so widely renowned for its beauty. Even
what is left of it shows the beauty of its proportions, the delicate traceries
of its stonework and carvings; and its arch, its leading feature, is one of
the most beautiful in all Europe.
' ' There is no portion of the old town which is not worth while to visit
and see. Through choked, narrow passage-ways, called streets, we drove ;
saw the house where John Knox lived, and the church where he preached ;
saw the wretched rooms in which Burns lodged, and the house where Allan
Ramsey lived; visited the Parliament House, plain and quite unpretending
in its style ; saw the stone which marks the exact spot of the Heart of Mid-
Lothian; visited the sacred old cemetery, where the bones of the resolute,
high-hearted, and God-fearing old Covenanters who suffered death in those
savage old times for opinion's sake, are entombed. We drove all about
that splendid drive called Queen's Drive, escorted on our way by a driver
who had evidently missed his vocation — whom Nature had designed for an
orator, but whom the hard lines of fate had made a garrulous, cock-eyed,
and canny hack-driver. I call him canny. •
" He was driving us by the hour, and at three shillings per hour, and
under those conditions speed was impossible ; and, as we reached any
interesting point, our lecturing jehu would descend from his box, and, hold
ing the lines in one hand, would extend the other after the approved fashion
of the Columbian orator, and discourse at length upon Arthur's Seat, Scot
tish nobility, the general loveliness of the valley at our feet ; and in every
instance mixed up with a discourse on John Knox.
"The dirtiest street I have ever seen is Cowgate. For its broad and
comprehensive filth, its infinite variety of nastiness, it stands peerless among
all the streets of all the cities of the world. But the days of Cowgate are
numbered ; the old narrow passage dignified by the name of street is about
closed, and ere long it will be but a 'putrid reminiscence.'
"One is constantly surprised, visiting the old town, at the enormous
height of its buildings. We saw them eleven and twelve stories high. The
blocks are pierced with curious entrances called 'closes,' where apparently
the refuse of each block is gathered, from which emerge bare-footed, red
headed, and dirty children, destined, if we may judge from the Scottish
character of the past, to flower out ultimately into learned professors, well
clad, well fe^d, and graciously sweet-mannered. In the times past, Scotland
has been the land of oats, itch, sulphur, scenery, and scholars: it has
THREE MONTHS IN EUROPE. 793
dropped its oats, itch, and sulphur, and in all Europe no more delightful
people — men and uomen — can be found than in Auld Reekie, the pictur
esque and beautiful capital. There is such an abundance of tough fibre in
the Scotch character that it takes the polish of culture superbly. It is, and
always has been, a dead-earnest character — tremendously firm in its opin
ions — willing to fight for them, and to die for them.
" Everyone who visits Edinburgh visits the old castle — the home of old
Scottish Kings. It is a powerful looking fortress, intrenched and anchored
on rocks almost precipitous on three of its sides, and looking formidable
enough. Here are other of Queen Mary's apartments, and very few pic
tures possessing some interest and some merit. Here is a beautiful little
chapel — very, very old — exquisite in its architecture, recently restored, and
to which the British Queen has contributed a beautiful painted window.
"We saw the window, a way up hundreds of feet above the valley
beneath, from which the miserable creature, King James, when a mere
babe, was let down in a basket, and to the great injury of mankind his
descent was safe. In one of these rooms he was born, and it was deemed
judicious that he should be quietly and most secretly transferred to other
quarters, and at the end of a long rope a basket was tied, in this basket
the babe was placed, and from that window he was let carefully down to
careful hands receiving him hundreds of feet below."
In this breezey style Mr. Storrs continued his newspaper nar
ratives over his journeyings on the continent and the entire story
would make a most readable account, did space allow it to be fully
given. On his return home he was enthusiastically welcomed by
his many friends, and soon after he plunged into his usual busy
round of work.
CHAPTER XLV.
THE CONCLUSION.
SOME CHARACTERISTICS OF MR. STORKS* WIT— ILLUSTRATIONS OF REPAR
TEE — HIS STYLE OF ORATORY — CONTRASTED WITH BURKE — A DRAMATIC
INCIDENT — LAST SCENES AND DEATH AT OTTAWA — THE END OF ALL MOR
TAL.
TNPULSATING ink cannot adequately give expression to
^_J the humor of Mr. Storrs' sayings. The piquancy of the
occasion, the peculiar glow of the heated brain, the laugh of the
eye, the rise and fall of the voice — untranslatable, unrepeatable,
never-to-be-well-understood save to the actual listening, watching
enjoyer, are needed. Running, too, as it does through all his
utterances, whether in the political or in the forensic efforts from
which selections have hereinbefore been made, it cannot be nec
essary, in conclusion, to attempt to preserve many of the bright,
original sayings of the man whose death rid the bar and the
world at large of much sunshine. There was, however, some
thing majestically splendid in his overflow of humor. It mattered
not, whether ill or hale, whether at the social board or in the
presence of the supreme bench, the fire would flash. A gentle
man who slept in the same room with him, in the crowded
hotel at Ottawa, the night before the death of Mr. Storrs, relates
how in the night between paroxysms of anguish, the great law
yer would make remarks or hurry off some funny story which
convulsed the listener even though tears stood in his eyes on
account of the lawyer-humorist's recent agonies. "Storrs' say,"
became a national mot, and the mention of his name, months
after his death, was but to call up story after story.
It will be a long time before his well-known description of
Ex-President Hayes, whom he never liked, will be forgotten.
794
THE CONCLUSION. 795
"There stood R. B. Hayes," he said while talking about Garfield's
funeral, "clad in a long, linen duster, with a straw hat on the
back of his head, holding in his right hand a yellow, worsted
bag with the letters ' R. B. H.,' worked in purple by Lucy;
and no one spoke to him except a policeman and he told him
to keep off the grass." At another time, he said in public,
" Hayes went into office chuck full of the milk of human kind
ness, anxious for an opportunity to shake hands with somebody
who had attempted the destruction of the Union." In the
memorable Rose-Douglas case, at Ann Arbor, in the midst of a
powerful argument as to whether or not a jury should be
empaneled, Mr. Storrs was interrupted by an opposing counsel's
remark: "How would it do to try it in Freedom Township, the
town of six nations over by Manchester, where the Germans are
all Democrats?" "German Democrats," said Storrs, "a jury of
that description wouldn't know whether the Saviour was crucified
on Calvary or shot at Bunker Hill." In a similar vein was his
excoriation of a witness who had evidently perjured himself on
the stand. "Why, gentlemen of the jury," exclaimed Mr. Storrs,
"this man with a soul, compressed to the size of an internal
wart, reminds me of what a great Kentuckian said of a similar
being, who was advised to repent hard for many years in order that
Omnipotence might get jurisdiction to damn him." A young
man once approached him with, " Mr. Storrs, pardon me, but
you are a man who has thought much upon all topics. I wish
to ask you for your opinion of Heaven and Hell." Fixing his
keen eyes on the enquirer, Mr. Storrs answered "When I think
of the beauteous descriptions of the abode of the saints, and
when I recollect that many noble, witty, genial souls have died
' unregenerate,' I must answer you, sir, that, while, doubtless,
Heaven has the best climate, Hell has the best society."
The incident of a sheriff arranging to levy upon the dinner
which Mr. Storrs was about to give Lord Coleridge during the.
latter's visit to this country is well known. To a friend who
bantered him about it, he made the reply that he had the
honor of giving the first Lord's supper the world ever saw
which was attended by a representative of government. Apropos
to this Coleridge story is the one that while Storrs was in
London, he was dined by Lord Coleridge. Among the after-
LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
dinner speakers was one gentleman who, while frankly confess
ing 'his admiration for the remarkable growth of the interior city
of the States, at the same time expressed regret to learn that
the city from which the guest of the evening hailed was one
where commercial honor was at so low an ebb that hundreds of
merchants failed in the course of a year, always with large liabil
ities and small assets, and, that after the storm had passed,
these same merchants would reappear in the mart richer than
before and with head as high as ever. This was an aspersion
upon his home city that Mr. Storrs would not permit to go
unanswered. "I assure you, gentleman," said he a few minutes
later, "the gentleman has been misinformed. I am glad to be
able to correct his error, and how shamefully he has been
imposed upon by his informants will appear when I declare to
you that during the twenty years I have lived in Chicago not
one business failure has occured there involving a sum exceed
ing fifteen thousand dollars. Not one, sir, in twenty years!
Failures in Chicago? Why, gentlemen, our glorious young
giant of the West has but one language — that of grand old
Mother England — and the word 'fail' never found a place in
its lexicon." The Englishmen, both astonished and delighted,
cried "Hear, hear!" Is was a remarkable showing, and none
knew enough about the distant city to refute the statement.
Later in the evening, however,* an inquisitive Englishman cor
nered Mr. Storrs and inquired : " Wasn't that statement of yours
about there being no important failures in Chicago for twenty
years slightly exaggerated, Mr. Storrs?" "Exaggerated! Not in
the least, sir. Not a particle, sir. It was simply a magnificent
lie!" Once in court, Mr. Storrs made an objection to the testi
mony of a witness, whereupon the opposing counsel remarked,
"It hurts you to meet the truth." "Oh, no," was Mr. Storrs'
quick rejoinder. "I never meet the truth — it and I always travel
in the same direction," Similar in kind was his remark to a
friend who, when in the witness chair, declined to make a state
ment just as he was evidently wished. " I should like to favor
you, Mr. Storrs," said the witness, "but I have even more regard
for the truth than for you." ''Oh, very well," came the reply,
"but a man at your age ought not to desert old friends and
take up with strangers." Of a well-known lawyer who possessed
THE CONCLUSION. 797
a propensity for talking for publication and who was always
hunting around for interviews, Mr. Storrs observed, "He reminds
me of a jackass we had on the farm down East. He used to
come around to the empty rain barrel, stick .his head in it and
bray, and from the mighty roar that followed he thought he was
talking to the universe." A characteristic anecdote is told as to
how one day at Saratoga, sitting in a group of millionaires he-
was chaffed by them about his lack of prudence in money mat-;
ters. Suddenly turning upon his tormentors, he hurled : " You
rich fellows appear to think that money-making is an intellectual
process, and that the wealth acquired by you proves you are a
very superior kind of men. You are much mistaken. Acquisi
tiveness is not intellectual. It is merely an animal trait. It is
less highly developed in you gentlemen than it is in the chip
munk. The beaver is much your superior in this regard. Where
are the rich men in history? There are two only who live in the
legends of literature — Dives, who survives on account of his for
tunate connections with a pauper, and Croesus, because his name
has been used by poets merely as a synonym. Gentlemen, where
are the stock-holders who built the Parthenon? Doubtless they
sat around in Athens and spoke of the fine work that Phidias was
doing for them; but, gentlemen, where are the stock-holders to
day and where is Phidias?" On another occasion, his reckless
ness with money being reverted to, he retorted. "Money! if I
should try to save it I should become its slave. Now, it is my
weapon. When I fling it at people they become slaves of mine."
" Oh, yes," he once said of an eminent and rich Chicago man
" He's a nice man, a very nice man. I never observed but one
thing objectionable in him and that is that he is insufferable."
Of a man who talked much but said little, he said "He is a
fellow reminding me of a suddenness, such as if you opened
what looked like the parlor door and found all back-yard." One
day, General Martin Beem had Mr. Storrs in court to testify
in an assessment of damages for the" dissolution of an in
junction, and when the opposite counsel asked him if his pro
fessional charges were not usually very high, he responded in an
assumed solemnity of voice which amused even the court, "I do
not propose that the inadequacy of my charges shall ever be a
disgrace to my profession." Ever ready with a happy retort,
Ml MI.KV A. STORRS.
ready with an original anecdote, and, at the same time,
ever ready with some hit of wisdom, there was ground for Jane
Swisshelm writing, " Kmery A. Storrs calls up the idea of
a I)amascus Made.. Small, compact, alert, keen, incisive; with a
1 like a box of pigeon-holes, every one full, and none crowded;
.tiling in its appointed place, labeled, indexed, docketed, and
ready lor use on the instant. What he knows, he knows just
when he needs it; and is not troubled with after wit or any
lumber. He would be an expert wrestler who would trip
ra with quirks and quiddities, or unlocked for tactics of any
kind."
\(\^ wit, sparkling under the slightest provocation in social
life; his sense of the ridiculous, liable to emit epigrams under
all circumstances; his Irank derision of sham men and tinsel
appearances breaking into raillery and jest, might have led those
who did not know him as a lawyer into the belief that he
lacked gravity of spirit and might want thoroughness in the
handling of solemn trusts. Nothing could be further from the
truth. He showed to least advantage in the playful light of his
trifling moods. His real temper was profoundly earnest. As
was well known to a veteran bench and to his most formidable
opponents at the bar, his intellectual method in the analysis and
presentation of cases was relentlessly thorough. It has been said
of Kdmund Burke by an eminent living writer that to the easy
masters- of facts, lie added the far rarer art of lighting them
up by broad principles. This was true of Mr. Storrs. His suc-
was not due to fascinating devices, blinding eloquence, nor to
chance or fortuitous advantages. He won by the thoroughness
with which he i ts and by the surpassing skill with
which he applied great principles to them. Burke, in a stilted
*ty!i Ins appeals to men walled in by self-interest
and hereditary prejudice; the great advocate became the admira-
ot the world and oi posterity, but measurably failed to
convince hi >r persuade his country. Storrs, following
the same modfe, by the instinct of genius as well as by the
instruction of logic, had the more restricted, but not less respon
sible function of addressing courts constituted on equity and
juries bound to do simple justice. He adapted his style with
unerring instinct to its purpose.
THE CONCLUSION. 799
To demonstrate the soundness of his legal proposition, to estab
lish the moral correctness of a client's conduct, was his sole aim.
His diction, therefore, was simple, clear and direct. Ornament,
in political speaking, he did not despise and the graces of imag
ination he was wont, on appropriate themes, to employ for their
embellishment, but as an advocate before new dealing with facts
and law, he adhered to the simplest and plainest speech, aiming
always to secure not only the approval of accomplished jurists,
but to enlighten and convince the reason of every man. Although
physically weak, he had so cultivated a naturally pleasing organ
that his voice was as distinct in a small chamber as it was far
carrying in vast halls. He was totally devoid of theatricalism in
elocution, gesture and personal bearing,- but would sometimes
resort to dramatic effects when they were calculated to make an
important matter .clearer to a jury. For instance, in the Sullivan
case, he suddenly required the powerful McMullen to seize, pinion
and choke him before the jury, precisely as he had seized, pin
ioned and choked Sullivan into helplessness for Hanford. Again
he objected to the reading of a single passage of Hanford's let
ter by the counsel who made the closing speech for the prosecu
tion and insisted upon stating exactly what was objectionable in
the letter. His adversary impatiently said: "Very well, read the
whole letter if you like." "Thank you, I will," said Mr. Storrs.
After the closing speech was made, Mr. Storrs arose in his most
bland manner and proceeded to read the whole letter to the jury.
All three of counsel for state were on their feet objecting, but as
one of them had consented that Mr. Storrs might read it, he was
allowed to do so. That consent was probably given to prevent
Mr. Storrs from interrupting and correcting counsel, but it was
not supposed he would read it after the closing speech! He did
read it, and often afterwards said, the reading of that anonymous
letter was the very best speech for the defence that could possi
bly be made to the jury before that body retired for deliberation.
"Let me burn out; not rust out," he was often heard saying.
The prayer was granted. The city of Ottawa, where sat the
Supreme Court of Illinois, before which Mr. Storrs had been
arguing "the legality of trial by information," was stirred into
excitement Saturday morning, September 12, 1885, by ^ie
announcement that the Mr. Storrs was dead. He had complained
800 LIFE OF EMERY A. STORKS.
for several days of pleuratic pains in his left side, but as he con
tinued in his professional engagements, no one had regarded him
as seriously ill. He himself seemed to feel forebodings of death.
Two days before, he had said casually, in the midst of an argu
ment, that it was probably the last time he should appear in
such a place, and the Friday, preceding the night of his death,
he said, " My heart pains me sadly — I am going to send for my
wife," and it was in response to his telegram that Mrs. Storrs
left Chicago for Ottawa and was with him when he quietly, in
an unexpected paroxysm of the heart, entered into the Unknown.
It is no exaggeration to say that the news of his death produced
sadness throughout the English-speaking world. Wherever wit
and oratory stretch out the sword of flame, wherever the plat
form and the press find their vast audiences, there flashed the
intelligence "Emery A. Storrs, of Chicago, is dead." Among
his home friends, in the metropolis which he had, in his love
and admiration, so often termed "the city of my soul," through
out the breadth of the land which he had so often delighted, the
fact that his life's work was ended seemed impossible. Said^
Professor David Swing, at the Unity Church, Chicago, four days >
later when a great and mourning audience was solemnizing the
last sad rites, " Emery A. Storrs was a man of such intellectual
life that we could never associate his name with death. We who
have known him for a score of years have known him only as
speaking, acting, moving other minds by wit and logic. When .
we remember the almost unequalled power of expression and the y
boldness Mr. Storrs possessed, we may regret that he could not '
have seen his death a few days or hours in advance, for we
should have had from him his best summing up of the argu
ments of religion. He would have presented to wife and friends
the evidence of immortal life."
He needs no eulogy. The social circle, the attentive jury, the
respectful court, the waiting audience, the admiring press, miss
him. The flowers of Graceland bloom and fade over that epi
tome of all mortal, engraven upon the plate of the sombre casket:
"EMERY A. STORRS;
Born Aug. 12, 1835;
Died Sept. 12, 1885."
of
jjnm: fyanrb unify pr0F0nnb $0rr0w ^ lip subban
the
nub bssnt ia erpms lfymi| basp $$n$a 0^ lip
f fynu^ $u$lain0b. fit fjis b^ify Jfya^ matirn
0F{ n sinuntfy frbnb, n uii$a nnb mgtfant
nnb H Balb anb un^mpramising ^n^ off
unraslrjitiab fiquuij Ir^ffiq. ^n Ifya aar!tj fyi$10r^
Ifya Jiaitguar tufyan it fyab ^aiu Firianb$t anb uifyan
o$l $trm0ifying to ia il$ nbua^nla^ Hr. J>torr$
unb $iba B^ $5ba uiiify °I[. ![. ^Im^nborf nnb
Jtnbraut JPmixm in nrging ii$ ^Inim$ 10 p0pnlat| $np-
spiral q0nn$alr nnb tufyila fyi$ $aruiqa$ tuaria gban
i$ anrinanoj n$ n }niui|ar r^nbarab Ifyam
^to^nanl u0tqa nnb fyi$ brjHinnl pan
maija nlumtjs Fpalg gb^n to Ifya jiangn^
nnb ttttftfttd prin;* in lip platform na
lian 0ngra$$0b fyis Hpugfyls $a tmtdf as lip qnu$0 af{
Up Gilixrns' ^r;|9n^ fy*$ b0aalian la it amannling la
ijnUjnsiasm, ]|0 urns mtu$lamah la $«jty Ifjal ^na
ngantty in 1^0 qilty i$ baing $a mnt§ la rshnaj
nnh r^farm pntltq apinian n$ Up iilk^ns' J
j[ n $ingb btirn^ giuan tty m n
i^ ^nH nbanl |anr ipnrs nga an
af[ lip Jliagn^
an l^a bafillj aF °B[. 1[> JUin^nbarff i$ slill
in l^a nnjmanj af n$ nil. f 1 um$ ^i$ gaab
la $00 fji$ 0(Tarl$ an b^alf af{ l^i Ji0ngt»j
uiillj $ntrrj$$t nnh Hp J0ngn0 t0qama tu0H
in 1^0 ^il^t la utlp$0
Up fosl ipnr$ afj Ip$
tttong wbtr«0ff tui % mamfotp* alj
iu^ (Bammill00t ui^a iu0r,0 H$$anHl0h xuillj
{jim in 1^0 uiai;kr basirtng la tjatarb I|i$
baualian nnb mmdbmH^ $0i|uit0$t
llpl 1^5$ 0j0mat|inl B0 $pqnb npan
nnl^ nnb a qapij b Irnn$mill0b la
uribatu af l^s b0^0H$^bt uiill| anr nnfijignijb $tym
in ^rr nfflitlian. J
,