(logo)
(navigation image)
Home American Libraries | Canadian Libraries | Universal Library | Open Source Books | Project Gutenberg | Biodiversity Heritage Library | Children's Library | Additional Collections

Search: Advanced Search

Anonymous User (login or join us)Upload
See other formats

Full text of "Life of Saint Francis of Assisi"

LIFE OF 
RANCIS OF ASSISI 



FHER CUTHBERT, O.S.F.C 



sLJU 













A LIST OF NEW BOOKS. 

THE LIFE OF JOHN HENRY CARDINAL NEWMAN. 
Based on his Private Journals and Correspondence. By WILFRID 
WARD. With numerous Portraits and other Illustrations. 2 vols. 
Svo. 36s. net. 

MEMOIRS OF SCOTTISH CATHOLICS DURING THE 

SEVENTEENTH AND EIGHTEENTH CENTURIES. Selected from 
hitherto inedited MSS. by WILLIAM FORBES LEITH, S.J. With Illus 
trations. 2 vols. Medium Svo. 7s. 6d. net. 

THE LIFE AND TIMES OF BISHOP CHALLONER (1691- 

1781). By EDWIN H. BURTON, D.D., F.R.Hist.Soc., Vice-President of 
St. Edmund s College, Ware. With 34 Portraits and other Illustrations. 
2 vols. Svo. 25s. net. 

THE DAWN OF THE CATHOLIC REVIVAL IN ENG 
LAND, 1781-1803. By the Right Rev. Monsignor BERNARD WARD, 
President of St. Edmund s College, Ware. With 38 Illustrations. 
2 vols. Svo. 25s. net. 

THE EVE OF CATHOLIC EMANCIPATION: being the 

History of the English Catholics during the first Thirty Years of the 
Nineteenth Century. By the Right Rev. Monsignor BERNARD WARD. 
With Portraits and other Illustrations. (In Three Volumes.) Vols. 
I. and II. 1803-1820. Svo. 21s. net. 

AT HOME WITH GOD: Prie-dieu Papers on Spiritual Sub 
jects. By the Rev. MATTHEW RUSSELL, S.J. 3s. 6d. net. 

AMONG THE BLESSED: Loving Thoughts about Favourite 
Saints. By the Rev. MATTHEW RUSSELL, S.J. With 8 Full-page 
Illustrations. Crown Svo. 3s. 6d. net. 

THE SERMON OF THE SEA, and other Studies. By the 
Rev. ROBERT KANE, S.J. Crown Svo. 5s. net. 

THE PLAIN GOLD RING: Lectures on Home. By the Rev. 
ROBERT KANE, S.J. Crown Svo. 2s. 6d. net. 

THE WESTMINSTER LIBRARY. 

A SERIES OF MANUALS FOR CATHOLIC PRIESTS AND STUDENTS. 
Edited by the Right Rev. Mgr. BERNARD WARD and the Rev. HERBERT THURSTON, S.J. 

THE MASS: a Study of the Roman Liturgy. By ADRIAN 
FORTESCUE, D.D., D.Ph. Crown Svo. 6s. net. 

THE NEW PSALTER AND ITS USE. By the Rev. EDWIN 
BURTON, D.D., Vice-President of St. Edmund s College, Ware, and the 
Rev. EDWARD MYERS, M.A. Crown Svo. 3s. 6d. net. 



LONGMANS, GREEN AND CO, 39 Paternoster Row, London; 
New York, Bombay and Calcutta. 



A LIST OF NEW BOOKS. 

THE PRICE OF UNITY. By B. W. MATURIN, formerly of 
Covvley St. John, Oxford. Crown 8vo. 5s. net. 

Father Maturings new book treats of the questions in controversy between 
Rome and the English Church. 

SAINT FRANCIS OF ASSISI : a Biography. By JOHANNES 
JOERGENSEN. Translated by T. O CoNOR SLOANE. With Illustrations. 
8vo. 12s. 6d. net. 

THEODICY : Essays on Divine Providence. By ANTONIO ROSMINI 
SERBATI. Translated with some omissions from the Italian Edition 
of 1845. 3 vols. Crown 8vo. 21s. net. 

PRIMITIVE CATHOLICISM: being a Study of the Develop 
ment of Christian Institutions. By Mgr. PIERRE BATIFFOL. Trans 
lated by HENRY L. BRIANCEAU. 8vo. 12s. 6d. net. 

THE CREDIBILITY OF THE GOSPEL ("Orpheus" et 
1 Evangile). By Mgr. PIERRE BATIFFOL. Translated by the Rev. 
G. C. H. POLLEN, S.J. Crown 8vo. 4s. 6d. net. 

BACK TO HOLY CHURCH: Experiences and Knowledge 
acquired by a Convert. By Dr. ALBERT VON RUVILLE, Professor of 
Modern History in the University of Halle. Translated by G. SCHOE- 
TENSACK. With a Preface by the Very Rev. Mgr. ROBERT HUGH 
BENSON. With Portrait. Crown 8vo. 3s. 6d. net. 

HUMILITY, THE TRUE TALISMAN : a Study of Catholicism. 
By Dr. ALBERT VON RUVILLE. Translated by G. SCHOETENSACK, with 
a Preface by the Very Rev. Mgr. ROBERT HUGH BENSON. Crown 8vo. 
3s. 6d. net. 

CHRIST IN THE CHURCH: a Volume of Religious Essays. 
By the Very Rev. Mgr. ROBERT HUGH BENSON. Cr. 8vo. 3s. 6d. net. 

THE FRIENDSHIP OF CHRIST. Sermons by the Very Rev. 
Mgr. ROBERT HUGH BENSON. Crown 8vo. 3s. 6d. net. 

THE COST OF A CROWN : a Story of Douay and Durham. 
A Sacred Drama in Three Acts. By the Very Rev. Mgr. ROBERT 
HUGH BENSON. With Illustrations by GABRIEL PIPPET. Crown 8vo. 
3s. 6d. net. 

A MYSTERY PLAY IN HONOUR OF THE NATIVITY OF 
OUR LORD. By the Very Rev. Mgr. ROBERT HUGH BENSON. 
With Illustrations, Appendices, and Stage Directions. Crown 8vo. 
2s. 6d. net. TEXT, with a few Notes, 6d. net. 

THE MAID OF ORLEANS: a Play. By Very Rev. Mgr. 
ROBERT HUGH BENSON. With Illustrations. Crown 8vo. 3s. net. 

t* An Acting Edition -without the Illustrations can also be had price 
Qd. net. 



LONGMANS, GREEN AND CO., 39 Paternoster Row, London ; 
New York, Bombay and Calcutta. 



LIFE OF ST. FRANCIS OF ASSISI 



Jfrhil (Dbstat ; 

THOS. BERGH, O.S.E. 



Imprimatur : 

EDM. SURMONT, 

Vic. Gen. Westmonast. 



LIFE OF 
ST. FRANCIS OF ASSISI 



BY 

FATHER CUTHBERT, O.S.F.C, 



WITH THIRTEEN ILLUSTRATIONS 



LONGMANS, GREEN AND CO. 

39 PATERNOSTER ROW, LONDON 

NEW YORK, BOMBAY AND CALCUTTA 

IQI2 



PREFACE 

THIS book is an attempt to represent Saint Francis of 
Assisi as I have come to know him after many years 
study of the early records bearing upon his history. 
Hitherto no adequate biography of tKe samtlias been 
written in the English tongue, though Canon Ivnox 
Little has given us a study of his character, which is 
of real merit. Nor does any modern biography, 
"to my thinEmgT^ 

he is revealed in the historical records which have 
come down to us. Paul Sabatier s well-known 
"Vie dv S. Franqois (TAssise is a delightful piece of 
literature ; but had the author possessed the fuller 
knowledge supplied by historical research since 1894 
a research in which he himself has taken a lead 
ing part I think that his book would have been 
a more authentic history. J. Jorgensen s recent 
work, known to me only in its French translation, 
has undoubtedly caught more of the spiritual thought 
and mental atmosphere of St. Francis ; and he had 
the advantage which M. Sabatier did not possess, of 
the research work just referred to. Nevertheless it 
seems to me the final biography of the saint is yet to 
be desired. I cannot presume to have attained this 
desired goal ; but perhaps this present book may do 
something towards its attainment : in the hope that it 
will do so, the book is published. 



vi PEEFACE 

I must confess my obligations to the many students 
of St. Francis history who have gone before me. It 
will not be invidious if I single out for special men 
tion the Franciscan editors of Quaracchi, P. Edouard 
d Alengon and M. Paul Sabatier, to whose patient 
labours all Franciscan research students gladly pay 
their tribute of grateful acknowledgment. But to 
all of whose labours I have availed myself, and whose 
names will be found in this book, I now render my 
thanks. Finally I must tender my respectful acknow 
ledgment to the most Rev. Fr. Pacificus of Sejano, 
Minister-General of the Order of Friars Minor Cap 
uchin, for his gracious approbation of this " Life " of 
the Seraphic Francis. 



FR. CUTHBERT, O.S.F.C. 



ST. ANSELM S HOUSE, 
OXFORD. 



CONTENTS. 

BOOK I. 

CHAP. PAGE 

I. THE COMING OF FEANCIS 1 

. II. FEANCIS DEEAMS OF GLORY AND FAME 15 

III. How FEANCIS FOUND THE LADY POVEETY 26 

IV. FEANCIS RECEIVES HIS KNIGHTHOOD OF THE CEOSS ... 37 
^ V. THE BEGINNING OF A NEW FEATEENITY 50 

VI. FlEST MlSSIONAEY JOUENEYS 61 

VII. POPE INNOCENT APPEOVES THE ROLE OF THE OEDEE ... 76 



=r. 



BOOK II. 

I. RIVO-TOETO 92 

II. THE POEZIUNCOLA 104 

III. THE POEZIUNCOLA (continued) 119 

IV. SAINT CLAEE 131 

V. FIEST ATTEMPTS TO EEACH THE INFIDELS 150 

T VI. FEANCIS ATTENDS THE FOUETH LATEEAN COUNCIL . . . 168 

VII. THE POEZIUNCOLA INDULGENCE 188 

BOOK III. 

I. A NEW PHASE OPENS IN THE LIFE OF THE FEATEENITY . . 198 

II. THE CHAPTEE OF MATS 218 

III. FEANCIS GOES TO THE EAST ........ 230 

IV. THE REVOLT OF THE VICABS 242 

V. BEOTHEE ELIAS ASSUMES THE GOVEENMENT 257 

VI. THE THIED OEDEE 271 

VII. THE FEIAES ESTABLISH A SCHOOL 291 

VIII. THE TRIAL OF FEANCIS 310 

vii 



viii CONTENTS 

BOOK IV. 

CHAP. PAGE 

I. GBECCIO 326 

II. THE STIGMATA 335 

III. TOWARDS EVENING 350 

* IV. THE LAST JOURNEY 366 

v V. TESTAMENT AND DEATH 378 

APPENDICES. 

I. THE PRIMITIVE EULE OF ST. FRANCIS . . , . . . . 393 

ANALYSIS OF REGULA PRIMA 395 

II. THE INDULGENCE OF THE PORZIUNCOLA 404 

III. THE RULE OF THE THIRD ORDER 412 

IV. THE SOURCES OF OUR KNOWLEDGE OF ST. FRANCIS , 417 



LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. 

ST. FRANCIS OF ASSISI . . Frontispiece 

From the lUh Century picture at Christ Church, Oxford, ascribed to 
Margaritone. 

FACING PAGE 

GATEWAY, ASSISI (looking towards Perugia) 17 

ABOVE SAN DAMIANO 37 

BETWEEN GUBBIO AND CITTA DI CASTELLO 61 

OLD ASSISI 96 

THE CHAPEL OF PORZIUNCOLA . . . 104 

SAN DAMIANO 141 

THE COUNTRY BEHIND ASSISI 198 

PRIMITIVE FRANCISCAN HERMITAGE (Grotto of Soffiano) .... 252 

ANCIENT FRANCISCAN FRIARY (Lo Sperimento, near Camerino) . . 304 

THE FRIARY OF GRECCIO 330 

MONTE ALVERNIA 343 

LE CELLE (near Cortona) 366 



BOOK I. 

CHAPTEE L 
THE COMING OF FRANCIS. 

As you go to-day along the white road that leads from the 
Porziuncola to the city of Assisi, a great peacefulness seems to 
pervade all the country-side. The ancient city is in repose, 
resting on the slope of a spur of Monte Subasio, like an old 
warrior whose fighting days are over. There is something 
grim in its aspect even in the soft brilliancy of the Umbrian 
sun. Perhaps it is the old mediaeval fortress and the city wall 
that can still be seen high up the hill ; perhaps it is the grey 
bare surface of the mountains behind ; or perhaps it is the 
very position of the city built as it were with its back to the 
hill and its face to all comers whether friends or foes. This 
touch of sternness, however, does but give a zest to the spirit 
of peace which broods over it to-day. Its peacefulness is the 
repose of strength ; its rest, the rest of one who has lived. 

But Assisi still lives, though its life is not that of the 
world of strife and tumult. The raucous voices of the cab- 
drivers who invade the city on the occasion of a festa, and 
the wily bargaining of the sellers of objets de pitte, and the 
obtrusive self-advertisement of the new hotels, these suggest 
indeed the world that lies beyond the hill-bound valley ; but 
their voices are not the voices which fill the sweet air of 
Assisi. These speak neither of barter and gain, nor of strife 
and tumult, nor of any of the world s vanities, but of that in 
effable peace which is born of the deeper life and the deeper 
joys, aye, and of the deeper sorrows of the spirit. For Assisi 
even in its spirituality, is very human. The voices in the air 
are the voices of men, not of angels ; of men who have 

1 



2 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

passed through the many complexities of human experience 
before they found peace. And so the peacefulness which 
broods over the city and this vast plain before it, warms the 
heart even whilst it stills the heart s tumult and entices one s 
thoughts to the peace eternal. 

But there was little suggestion of peace in the atmosphere 
of Assisi in the year 1199. The city was then in the throes 
of a political upheaval, the outcome of which no one then 
foresaw ; certainly not Francis the light-hearted son of the 
merchant Pietro Bernardone, whose life story was to be 
shaped in no small measure by these present happenings. 

Like most of the industrial cities of Italy, Assisi had long 
been rebellious at heart against the domination of the German 
emperors. The enthusiasm for civic liberty, which had 
baulked the ambition of Barbarossa but had been obliged to 
bow the head to the energy of his successor, Henry VI, took 
new life when death itself put a stop to Henry s victorious 
progress in 1197 and a few months later in January, 1198, 
Innocent III ascended the Papal throne. At once Innocent 
set himself to checkmate the imperial policy inasmuch as it 
affected the relations of the Empire with the Church and the 
Italian cities. The deliberate aim of that policy under Bar 
barossa and his successor had been the subjection of Italy to 
the Imperial crown and the subordination of the Church to 
the Imperial prerogative. 1 Innocent s policy was to meet 
this menace by increasing the temporal power of the Papacy 
and welding all the Christian States into a confederacy under 
Papal suzerainty. Hardly was he seated in St. Peter s chair, 
than he set his hand to eject the German conquerors from 
the provinces upon which the Holy See had formerly some 
claim to overlordship ; and in pursuance of this policy he 
called upon Conrad of Lutzen to deliver up the Kocca of 
Assisi and surrender all his holdings to the Pope. Conrad, 
an adventurous Suabian, had been created Duke of Spoleto 
and Count of Assisi some twenty years previously by Bar 
barossa; of late years he had resided mostly at the Eocca 
of Assisi. He was a genial, easy-going tyrant, though a 
1 Cf. Huillard Breholles, Vie de Pierre de la Vigne, Partie IIP, X. 



THE COMING OF FEANCIS 3 

brave soldier. The people dubbed him " The Whimsical" : 
it has been said of him that he had one quality rare in a 
German overlord, he had regard for public opinion, and as 
far as his fealty to the emperor allowed, let them rule them 
selves. 1 But the foreign yoke galled the cities athirst for 
independence and the glory of being their own masters. 
Conrad, knowing himself powerless against Innocent, met the 
Papal legates at Narni in the spring of the year and signed 
the surrender. No sooner did the Assisians hear the news 
than they gathered together and in a glorious frenzy razed 
the Eocca to the ground. Never again, they were deter 
mined, should the hated fortress hold their city in subjection. 
Thereupon the Papal legates protested that the Eocca had 
become the property of the Holy See and threatened the city 
with an interdict. 2 The Assisians, however, took no heed of 
the protest, and with the stones of the Eocca set themselves 
to build a strong wall round the city. They were determined 
to secure their independence. 

But with the withdrawal of the German overlordship, the 
Assisians were not to find peace, whatever else they might 
gain. They very soon discovered that they must either 
strengthen their own communal sovereignty or fall into a 
state of vassalage to their more powerful neighbour, Perugia 
the city which stands so proudly upon a hill at the northern 
entrance to the Umbrian valleys, as though it were destined by 
nature to guard the land of Umbria against all unfriendly 
comers from the north and to keep vigilant watch over the 
valleys themselves. And Perugia was fully conscious of the 
dignity and power her position gave her amongst her Umbrian 
neighbours, nor was she without ambition to extend her sover 
eignty and maybe to reduce the valleys to practical vassalage. 
Already she had forced Arezzo to cede to her territories in the 
neighbourhood of Lake Thrasymene and had incorporated the 
district of Umbertide which commands the highways leading 
to Gubbio and Citta di Castello in the most eastern Umbrian 
valley ; and with these cities she had formed an alliance 

1 Ant. Cristofani, Storie di Assisi [ed. 1902], p. 49. 

2 Innocent III, Regestorum, Lib. I, LXXXVIII: " Mirari Cogimur". 



4 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

which made them little more than her retainers. She was 
quick to take advantage of the intestine quarrels of her 
neighbours, and by adopting the cause of one party, to bring 
all parties under her power. So when in the month of 
January, 1200, certain nobles in the territory of Assisi sought 
her protection against the Commune, Perugia eagerly made 
herself their advocate. That meant trouble for the Assisians, 
as they well knew ; but being a stout-hearted people and them 
selves ambitious, they had no thought of submitting to 
Perugia s dictation. The original cause of the quarrel lay in 
the determination of the Commune of Assisi to strengthen 
the defences of the city and to force the feudal owners of lands, 
in their territories beyond the city walls, to submit to the 
common law of the Commune. But some of these nobles 
refused to acknowledge the Commune s authority, and at 
this the citizens attacked their castles and razed them to the 
ground and by force took the lands and buildings which they 
required for the city s defence. Nor would they restore to 
the dissident nobles their property nor acknowledge their 
privileges when Perugia took up their cause. The feud 
dragged on for two years and culminated in a battle near 
the Ponte San Giovanni, which lies about midway between 
the two cities. 1 / The Assisians were worsted in the fight, and 
amongst the prisoners taken that day by the Perugians, was 
the son of Pietro Bernardone, one of the most wealthy 
merchants of Assisi/ 

Thus Francis appears for the first time in the world s 
history, a figure in one of those petty wars which mark the 
struggle of mediaeval Italy for civic independence. He was 
at this time about twenty years of age, 2 and full of the zest of 

1 Cristofani, op. cit. p. 57 ; W. Heywood, A History of Perugia, p. 58 
seq. ; Bonazzi, Storia di Perugia, i. p. 257. 

a None of the legends give the date of Francis birth ; but it is evident 
from Thomas of Gelano, that he was born in 1181 or 1182. Speaking of the 
death of Francis on 4 October, 1226, Celano adds : " Twenty years being com- 
ted since he most perfectly adhered to Christ" (I Celano, 88) and further 
on he again says that Francis died " in the twentieth year of his conversion " 
(I Celano, 119). Francis conversion, therefore, took place in 1226 (cf. also, 
Leg. 3 Soc. 68; Spec. Perfectionis, cap. 124). But Celano further tells us 
that he was then " nearly twenty-five years of age " (I Celano, 2). Albert of 



THE COMING OF FBANCIS 5 

life. In appearance he was somewhat below middle height, 
slender of limb and of dark complexion. A general delicacy of 
feature the straight well-shapen nose, the smooth brow, the 
hands rather tenuous with tapering fingers betokened an Ortr c 
idealist temperament ; the rather thin lips were sensitive, but 
with indications of obstinacy, and in the dark eyes was a fear- 
less candour and the possibilities of a boundless hot enthusiasm. 
The low forehead bespoke a mind intuitive rather than logical. L.Qt \ 
He carried himself straightly and moved with a quick move 
ment. His voice was clear and musical and strong. 1 He 
dressed sumptuously as one delighting in colour and a certain 
barbaric splendour. Among the gay city youth he had won 
a certain proud leadership. r His vivacious and ready wit and 
tireless energy and exceeding good nature, made him a boon ^ , 
companion and general favourite ; a certain bizarre fancy and 
originality 2 and a great daring, gained him a willing following 
of youths given to fantastic and unconventional frolic.! At 
times one might detect behind the accustomed gaiety a latent 
seriousness of soul and a tendency to a gentle melancholy, 
and herein the philosopher might recognize something of the 
secret of his ascendency over this undisciplined youth. His 
popularity, however, was partly due to the lavishness with 
which he spent his money. His father, the wealthy merchant, 
gave him an unstinted allowance, and Francis never let money 
rest in his purse. It went as freely as it came. Friends and 
acquaintances of the family, astonished at his prodigality, 
would protest : "he might be a prince instead of the son of/T Cclr\ 
Pietro Bernard one ". 3 I But Pietro was of that mind that he 

Stadt gives the date of Francis birth as 1182 (Mon. Germ. Script. Tom. XVI, 
p. 350), but his accuracy is not unimpeachable. 

For chronology of Francis life, of. de Gubernatis, Orbis Seraphicus, 
Tom. I, p. 15 seq. ; Panfilo da Magliano, Storia compendiosa, Tom. I, p. 5 
seq. ; P. Leo Patrem in Miscellanea Francescana, Tom. IX, fasc. 3 ; Boehmer 
Analekten, p. 123 seq. ; Golubovich, Biblioteca Bio-Biographica, p. 85 seq. ; 
F. Paschal Robinson in Archivum Franc. Hist. an. I, fasc. I, pp. 23-30 ; Mont 
gomery Carmichael in Franciscan Annals, October, 1906. 

1 1 Celano, 83 ; of. ibid. 73. 

2 Of. Leg. 3 Soc. 2 : "In curiositate etiam tantum erat vanus quod aliquando 
in eodem induinento pannum valde carumpanno vilissimo consul faciebat ". 

3 3 Soc. 2 ; I Celano, 2. 



6 LIFE OF ST. FEANCIS OF ASSISI 

did not resent his son s lavishness, but rather rejoiced. He 
was himself ambitious, and perhaps saw in Francis popularity 
with the city youth a foreshadowing of the day when this 
son of his would be high in the civic council, perhaps even 
consul or podesta : a laudable ambition at a time when the 
magistrate of a semi-independent city treated with princes 
and Papal legates in some sort of equality. But if this 
were Pietro s ambition, Francis himself looked beyond civic 
honours. Quite what he aspired to, he himself could not tell 
at this time. He dreamed of fame and honours, but without 
any definite idea how fame was to come to him. He lived 
as yet in a world of legendary romance and had visions of 
being a great leader of men and dazzling the world by his 
feats and compelling its homage and admiration. 1 The de 
ference paid him now by the city youth was but a foretaste 
of that which was to come in the larger world where kings 
held court and heroes won fame. The city revels were to 
lead to revels of tourney and courts of love, where knight 
challenged knight, and poets sang : and whether in tourney 
or in court of love, Francis would meet all rivals. This ideal 
ism stood ever between Francis and his fellow-revellers. To 
them the evening frolic was but the excitement of the hour, and 
they tasted its coarseness and were besmirched by its sen- 
suousness : to Francis it was a crude anticipation of the 
battle of life as he had learned it in the romances of chivalry. 
Perhaps it was this which kept him morally clean and whole 
some amidst the dissipations in which he moved so freely. 
Where others came quickly to moral shipwreck, his tempera 
ment allowed him to assimilate only the subtler and more 
refined sensuousness of the scenes and not the coarser ele 
ments. He loved the song and parade, the adulation of the 
crowd, the movement and zest and the sense of leadership : 
but from grosser evils a natural fastidiousness saved him. 
Coarseness was alien to his nature : he was dainty in his food ; 
an obscene word made him silent. 2 

1 Of. 3 Soc. II, 5. 

2 In the early legends one finds apparently conflicting statements. Celano 



THE COMING OF FBANCIS 7 

A temperament such as his could not have found a more 
congenial nursing-ground than Assisi in the years immediately 
following the overthrow of the German domination. The 
life of the city was quickened ; the proud sense of freedom, 
chafed even by the mild suzerainty of Conrad of Lutzen, 1 was 
now set loose, and threw a glamour of patriotism even over 
the industrial activities of the city. There was a sense of 
building up the free commune as well as one s own house. 
One thing the German overlord had done for Assisi. He had 
given the citizens a period of comparative peace, during which 
the city had prospered materially, and the merchants had de 
veloped trade and gained wealth. The staple trade of Assisi, 
as of the other cities of central Italy, was in woollen stuffs, 
and the merchant in search of a market travelled wide and 
far. Thus Pietro Bernardone had a brisk business with 
France. And it was whilst he was~on one of these journeys 
to the French market that Francis, his eldest son, was 
born. To commemorate the circumstance the delighted father 
on., hia jcejurn home dubbed the... child Francesco " the 
Frenchman"; by which pet-name and not by his baptismal 
name, Giovanni^ the child was henceforth called. On their 
journeys, the merchants not only did business ; they gathered 
up and distributed the news of the world. They carried 
political and religious thought from one place to another 
along the route of their travel, and the news they brought 
was debated with that intensity of interest which belongs 
only to the more impassioned moments of life ; for at no time 
have men lived more keenly and with a greater zest for ideas 
than did the citizens of those mediaeval cities. In every de 
partment of life, whether in politics, in intellect, or in religion, 
the towns were big with change and revolution. There was 

S. Bonaventure (Leg. Maj. I), on the other hand, says : " Albeit in his youth 
Francis was reared in vanity . . . yet he went not astray among wanton 
youths after the lusts of the flesh". The contradiction is explained by the 
temperament of Francis. The Leg. 3 Soc. 3, suggests the solution : " Erat 
tamen quasi naturaliter curialis" etc. 

1 Conrad had even permitted the Assisians to join the league of the cities 
of Umbria and the Marches, for the defence of civic rights. Of. Cristofani. 
op. cit. p. 49. 



8 LIFE OF ST. FRANCIS OF ASSISI 

a restlessness abroad which none could escape : every town 
and city was more or less a radiating centre of critical dis 
content and revolutionary ideas ; and nowhere was this spirit 
^^ more active than in Italy, where each city in its semi-inde 
pendence was a sort of microcosm typical of the Christian 
universe. When the men of Assisi stormed the Rocca and 
razed it to the ground and built a wall around their city and 
sought to subject the nobles to the civic authority, they were 
conscious that they were taking part in a world- wide revolu 
tion the uprising of the city against the castle. In their 
streets and council chambers were discussed all the great 
questions agitating the peninsula and the Christian countries, 
whether secular or religious. Great as the power of the 
Church was, Italy at this time was seething with movements 
of Church reform, heretical and otherwise. There were the 
Cathari and Paterini, 1 who had swept like great sea waves 
over northern and central Italy, and set up conventicles in 
all the more populous centres, defying the ecclesiastical 
powers. They preached a return to apostolic simplicity in 
religion, denounced the Church for its wealth and secular 
ambitions, scoffed at the clergy and rejected the sacramental 
system. They were the Puritans of the Middle Ages. Then 
side by side with the heretical movements there was a wide 
spread feeling amongst the Catholics themselves, that all was 
not right in the Church. The orthodox discontent found ex 
pression in Lombardy and the North in the movement of 
the Humiliati, a society of lay-people who bound themselves 
to live by their labour, to eschew luxury in food and dress, 
to avoid taking part in war or feud and to serve the poor. 2 
But the Humiliati, whilst they aroused the conscience, failed 
to touch the imagination. 

Otherwise was it with the reform propaganda of the 
Cistercian Abbot Joachim in the South. 3 Joachim too 

1 Of. Gebhardt, L Italic Mystique, p. 26 seq. ; Felice Tocco, L J Eresia nel 
Medio Evo, p. 73 seq. The Paterini were in the first instance a movement 
supported by the Holy See ; but Arnold of Brescia revived the movement in 
opposition to the Church. 

2 Of. Tiraboschi, Vetera Hiimiliatorum Monumenta ; Gebhardt, op. cit. p. 34. 

3 Cf . Felice Tocco, op. cit. p. 261 seq. ; Gebhardt, op. cit. p. 49 seq. 



THE COMING OF FEANCIS 9 

preached poverty and humility, but unlike the other re 
formers he sought for renovation not by legal enactments 
and codes of conduct but by spiritual enlightenment. He was 
an Isaias bidding the people prepare for a renewed Kingdom 
of God by a clean conscience and prayer and the study of the 
Divine Word. When the spirit of the prophet first came 
upon him he had retired to a cave in Sicily and there had 
prepared himself for his mission by weeping over the sins 
of the people and imploring God s mercy. Then he had 
entered amongst the Cistercians at Sambucina as a lay-brother, 
had afterwards been ordained priest and elected abbot of the 
monastery. After a time he resigned the abbacy and secluded 
himself in the desert of Pietralata, where he wrote his pro 
phetical books concerning the new reign of the Spirit. 
Leaving the desert, he went about visiting the monasteries 
and preaching reform. Disciples flocked to him, and in 1189 
he founded a new monastic community at Flore in Calabria, 
which drew to it the eyes of multitudes of people, both of the 
clergy and the laity, who soon came to regard it as the holy 
Sion whence would issue the long-sought renovation of the 
Christian world. Gentle and pitiful, Joachim preached a 
gospel of love towards God and man : to many he seemed a 
very image of the Christ. His prophecies sent a thrill through 
all Catholic Italy, like the stirring of a new day. Men lifted 
up their heads in hope and yet in fear ; for the reign of the 
Divine Spirit about to come, was to be preceded by a sharp 
period of terror when the anti-Christ would appear on 
earth. 1 

The effect of Joachim s teaching was deep and lasting : 
for years after his death the people saw in political and re 
ligious events the fulfilment of his prophecies. 2 One of its 
immediate effects was the appearance of wandering devotees 
who went about calling the people to repentance, and utter- 

1 This period of the anti-Christ was to begin, according to Joachim, in 1199. 
Cf. Felice Tocco, op. cit. p. 290, n. 1. 

2 Thus Frederick II was regarded by many Catholics as the anti-Christ; 
whilst on the other hand his partisans gave him almost divine honours, and 
likened him to Jesus Christ. Cf. Huillard Breholles, Hist, diplomat, iv. p. 
378 ; Vie de P. de la Vigne, Pieces Justificatives, No. 107 et passim. 



10 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSIST 

ing cryptic prophecies of the coming time. Such a one was 
found in Assisi about this very time : he went through the 
streets, crying out : Pax et Bonum ! Peace and Well-doing I l 
In after times he was regarded as a precursor of that gospel 
of peace which Francis was to preach so successfully. The 
Franciscan movement was indeed cradled in the expectancy 
aroused by the Joachimite prophecies. Another indication 
how Assisi was affected by the general religious restlessness 
was the election of the heretic, Giraldo di Gilberto, in 1203, 
to the chief magistracy, and his remaining in office in spite 
of the protests of the Holy See. 2 

That Francis was conversant with all these movements 
as they were reflected in the life of his native city, there can 
be no doubt. In the narrow circle of a mediaeval commune, 
the son of a wealthy merchant, and partner in his father s 
trade, could not be ignorant of the quick forces of public 
opinion which carried men onwards so irresistibly. Neither 
can it be doubted that he took his part right willingly in the 
struggle for civic independence. But the sentiment which 
drew him out to fight against Perugia was hardly a reflective 
one but rather a blind instinct of loyalty and a natural love 
of adventure. He was as yet of that youthful cast of thought 
which values things in proportion to their nearness to one s 
personal concerns. To him the deep politics of the city 
counsellors would seem trivial compared with the youthful 
revels in which he found some semblance of his dream of life- 
As to the disputes between Catholics and Paterini and such 
like, they would seem to him whom they did not concern, 
mere waste of words and temper : if he gave serious thought 
to the matter at all, he would probably condemn all heretics 
as meddlers in the affairs of other men or as scarecrows at 
the feast. He was, in a word, too much wrapt up in his own 
dreams to be an ardent politician or religious disputant. In 
fact, he never quite descended from his world of dream even 
in after life, and was apt to be impatient of meddlers and 
heretics to the end. As to the coming of anti-Christ and the 
promised new revelation of the Spirit, these things might 

1 3 Soo. 26. - Gristofani, op. cit. p. 68. 



THE COMING OF FKANCIS 11 

have impressed him had they not been so strange to his 
outlook on life. He loved the world as it was : things might 
not be all as they should be, but there was great joy to be 
found there, and he kept close to the joy and shrank in 
stinctively from the sight of the sorrow as from some un 
explained mystery which would be troublesome if peered 
into. 1 

But amidst all the confusion of voices which filled the 
public places, there was one voice to which the young Francis 
listened with a joyous content, the voice of the troubadour. - 
Twenty years before the birth of Francis the singing poets 
of Provence had begun to invade Italy, drawn thither by the 
stir of life and freedom. They came singing aloud the joys 
and sorrows of youth and the glory of chivalry. Gaily or 
pathetically they lifted their voices in praise of love or adven 
ture, passing their fingers deftly and thrillingly over the 
varied strings of human emotion. Their songs, too, had the 
consistency of a faith however lightly they might be sung. 
Passionately they recited the glory of courage and endurance ; 
but always their heroes spent themselves for some high 
cause, either for the defence of the Christian faith or for the 
succouring of the weak or the oppressed. Or else they sang 
of love, of love sublimated by sacrifice and worship : 2 for 
whether they sang of battle or adventure or of love, a per 
sistent note in their harmonies was that of personal devotion 
and unselfish endurance for the sake of the good cause or the 
beloved. Their,herp_esjw ere chosen from folk-lorejind legend. 
Arthur and his Bound Table, Charlemagne and his puissant 
paladins, supplied them with inspiring themes. So with his 
romance of chivalry and his songs of love the minstrel from 
Provence visited the courts of the Italian nobles, 3 whence he 
sent forth a haunting voice which set the heart of youth 

1 Cf. Testamentum S. F. : " Nimis mihi videbatur amarum videre leprosos ". 

2 Cf. M. Fauriel, Dante ct les Origines de la Langue et de la Litterature 
Italie-nnes, p. 279 scq. ; cf. Karl Bartoch, Chrestomathie Provencale (a collection 
of troubadour songs) ; Em. Monaci, Testi anticlii provenziali. 

3 The most famous Provencal singers such as Bernard de Ventadour, 
Cadenet, Raimbaut de Vaguerras, Pierre Vidal, were frequently in Italy about 
the end of the twelfth century. Fauriel, op. cit. p. 257. 



12 LIFE OF ST. FEANCIS OF ASSISI 

astir and was as a fresh breeze amidst the pessimism which 
had so long depressed the vitality of the peninsula. 

Now it may seem a strange thing that this merchant s 
son, whom in after years men would come to regard as a 
patron saint of democracy, should have had his mind and 
character formed by the romance of chivalry and the love- 
song of the troubadour. Yet so it was in fact. He drew the 
form into which his ambition was cast, out of the tales of 
. knight-errantry and knightly adventure, and the love-song 
fostered his native instinct for the perfect lover. By tem 
perament he had but little taste for book-knowledge; he 
loved better the life of action and the free air : but he learned 
eagerly the tales of the Bound Table and of Eoland and 
Oliver the great paladins. 1 He had no doubt that these 
heroes were such as the minstrels pictured them ; he believed 
that their peers might be found again and he amongst them. 
In truth, were not valiant knights fighting for the faith and 
the right and performing prodigies of valour in the Eastern 
lands, and even in the Southern provinces of Italy, where the 
Germans were warring against the Church ? So he dreamed 
his dream, whilst men waged heated controversy over Church 
reform and the prophets foretold world-disaster and the 
coming of the new life. 

To the end of his days this dream of romantic chivalry will 
remain with Francis and be the chief secular influence in the 
shaping of his story. He will outgrow his early crude ambi 
tions of secular achievement and change his ultimate purpose 
and take to himself other weapons of combat and extend his 
vision of life : but to the last he will always think of himself 
as a knight-errant, and the governing law of his life will be 
the knightly code of fearless courage, worshipful love and 

1 Vide Spec. Perfect, cap. 4 and 72 ; also F. Paschal Kobinson, The 
Golden Sayings of Brother Giles, p. 61. The Latin legends of Arthur and his 
knights were already published in Italy about the end of the twelfth century ; 
as well as the Provencal versions of the romances of Arthur and Charlemagne. 
Of. Fauriel, op. cit. I, p. 286. The influence of the troubadour s love-song is 
very marked in early Franciscan literature, notably in the religious songs of 
Jacopone daTodi ; bnLErancia aeema-to -have drawn hiaunapiration more from 
the chivalric romances. 



THE COMING OF FBANCIS 13 

gentle courtesy. To the end, too, he will be a singer of song 
and carry with him the poet s sensitive feeling for the sun 
shine and shadows of life. Always he will feel a knightly 
scorn for compromise and the by-ways of diplomacy ; he 
will be quick to obey the call of the quest and will deem dis 
loyalty the blackest of sins, 

Some will have it that his romantic temperament was due 
to his mother s blood ; for they say the Lady Pica, the wife of 
Pietro Bernardone, was of gentle birth and Proven9al origin : 
but of this there is no certain proof. 1 Yet there can be little ^ 
doubt of her saving influence in the formative period of 
Francis character. Between mother and son there was that - 
close understanding sympathy which is more often felt as an 
atmosphere rather than as denned action ; whose influence 
therefore is the more subtle and penetrating, whether for 
restraint or for direction. It was Pica who, when her neigh- bf 
bours were commenting upon Francis princely manners and 
ambitions, remarked to their amazement: " I will tell you P y) 
how this son qf mine will turn out ; he will become a son of 
God ". 2 In her fond watchfulness she had seen how he would 
never refuse an alms to a beggar and how whenever the 
name of God was uttered in his presence he grew reverent 
and worshipful. 3 And out of the experience of her own soul, 

_^The early legends tell us nothing concerning the origin of Francis 
mother. The supposition of her Provencal origin may have arisen from the 
fact that Francis spoke the French tongue (cf. I Celano, 16; II Celano, 
13, 127 ; Spec. Perfect, cap. 93) but he may have learned this as part of the 
education of a merchant s son, who would have need to carry on trade with 
France. As to the tradition that Pica was of noble birth, a contemporary 
legal document published by Cristofani, op. cit. pp. 50-51, styles her Domina 
Pica; from which M. Sabatier (Vie de S. F. p. 8, n. 2) deduces that she 
must have been of noble origin. But in Southern Europe the more wealthy 
merchants at this time claimed equality of rank with the nobles. Cf. Fauriel, 
Preuves de I histoire du Languedoc, in. p. 607. Nothing is really known 
concerning the family-origins of Francis. According to a document discovered 
by Bishop Spader in the eighteenth century, the Bernardoni migrated to 
Assisi from Lucca. Of. P. Marcellino da Civezza, San Francesco oriundo dai 
Moriconi di Lucca. 

2 II Celano, 3. Further on we shall find Pica encouraging Francis in 
his religious adventure. 

3 Leg. Maj. i. Cf. Leg. 3 Soc. 9. 



14 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

perhaps, she read the significance of these signs. So whilst 
his father was hugging his own forecast of his son s future 
position in the Commune and begrudging no money that 
would help him to secure the highest place; and whilst 
friends and neighbours were divided in opinion, some regard 
ing him as a spendthrift and wastrel and others as a young 
man with a well-formed ambition and assured success, the 
Lady Pica held in her heart some dim vision in which knightly 
adventure was interwoven with saintship and the spirit of 
the troubadour sang its songs in heaven. And who shall say 
how far the mother s dream determiaed the life-story of her 
son? 



CHAPTER II. 
FRANCIS DREAMS OF GLORY AND FAME. 

AFTER the battle of Ponte San Giovanni, Francis, as we have 
said, was lodgedfin prison. 1 

Now to the traveller there is no city in Umbria of such a 
queenly majesty as Perugia. Built upon a hill-top at the 
northern entrance to all the Umbrian valleys, it has a proud 
beauty of outline which holds the eye, and compels a sort 
of rapturous worship until you enter within the city, and 
then there is a certain grimness in its massive public build 
ings, instinct with beauty though they are, which indicates 
still that almost brutal ambition for power which made 
Perugia, in the heyday of its glory, feared and hated by its 
neighbours. The Palazzo dei Priori, the symbol of that 
strange commingling of brutal strength with exquisite artistic 
feeling, was not yet built in Francis time, but the spirit 
which demanded it of the builders was there. Perugia had 
humbled Assisi, yet not so decisively as to bring the weaker 
city to an unconditional surrender, and she was wary enough 
not to waste her strength ineffectively. Negotiations followed 
but dragged somewhat slowly, and meanwhile the prisoners 
were kept in unpitying confinement for the greater part of 
a year. 

Francis, it would seem, took his imprisonment light- 
heartedly enough. He sang and made merry though his 
fellow-captives grew depressed and irritable. They were 
chafing at the narrow confinement ; he was dreaming his 
dream of chivalry. To him this affray of the Ponte San 
Giovanni with its untoward consequence, was the beginning 

1 Being the son of a wealthy citizen he was not put with the common 
soldiery but with the nobles. 3 Soc. 4. 

15 



16 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSISI 

of real life : for battle and captivity were equally incidents 
in the knightly adventure upon which he had set his heart. 
Those around him, not seeing the light which made his 
day, thought him deficient in sanity. " Surely," said one 
of them, "you are mad that you can be merry in prison." 
" Would you know why I am merry ? " retorted Francis. " I 
see the day when all the world will bow in homage before 
me." l His good-nature, too, was irrepressible. There was 
amongst them a knight of so sour and bitter a temper, that 
his fellow-prisoners entirely avoided his company, all except 
Francis, who attached himself to the outcast and by kindness 
won him to more genial ways and finally healed the breach 
between him and his fellows. 2 At length, however, in 
November, 1203, a treaty of peace was signed. 3 The 
fugitive nobles who had been the cause of the war were to 
be reinstated in their property, but on their part they bound 
themselves never again to enter into alliance with any 
foreign power without the consent of the Commune. 4 Thus 
Assisi saved its civic authority though at the cost of a 
drubbing. The prisoners were now set free. But the long 
confinement and enforced inaction had told upon the health 
of Francis, and after his return home an attack of fever was 
nearly the end of his earth- story ; though as it happened it 
proved instead to be its real beginning. For it was then as 
he lay during long weeks upon his sick bed, that there came 
i (V *Ttcr\xtp_ Francis the first troublous intimations of a life other than 
that of which he had hitherto dreamed, a life dedicated to 
God and the quest of eternal things. 5 They were but as the 
sound of the far-off sea-waves to one who has never yet seen 
the ocean ; he could not tell with any distinctness their 
demand, but they brought a trouble to his thoughts and 
heart, which was to remain there till the demand was fully 
known and accepted. That was not to be yet. With con- 

*3 Socii, 4; II Celano, 4. 2 ibid. 

3 Leo Patrem (Misc. Franc. Vol. IX, fasc. 3, p. 84) disputes this date of 
1203, given by Ant. Cristofani, and argues for 1202. The original document 
was discovered in 1910 in the municipal library of Perugia ; but my efforts to 
obtain a copy of it have been fruitless. 

4 Cristofani, op. cit. p. 93 seq. 5 1 Celano, 3 ; Leg. Maj. i. 2. 




GATEWAY, ASSISI 

(Looking towards Perugia) 



FEANCIS DEEAMS OF GLOEY AND FAME 17 

valescence the old dream of adventure and fame came back 
and the old eager joy in the dreamland which his fancy 
made of the earth. The first disillusionment came when he 
took his first walk abroad. He went out by one of the city 
gates, his heart hungering for a sight of the fair earth. 
There he stood leaning upon a stick and gazing wistfully 
upon the wide valley where on a sunny day the scintillating 
haze envelops the hills and the plain in a mystic glory, and 
the golden towns, dotted along the hillsides, look farther off 
than they really are, and the white course of the river winds 
across the lowland. And for the first time the living earth 
failed him. To his call there came no response : as well 
might he have been within the walls of his sick-room. 
" The beauty of the fields, the delight of the vineyards and 
all that is fair to the eye, could in no way gladden him," 
| says Thomas of Celano ; " wherefore he was amazed at the 
j| change which had so suddenly come upon him and thought 
them most foolish who could love these things." l 

But movement and fresh air in time brought back his 
strength and he became restless for action. The events of 
the affray with Perugia and the test of sickness had deepened 
his character. He was no longer content with the life of 
youth ; he must enter into the life of men. 

And the opportunity at length came. 2 Since 1198 all Italy 
had been watching the struggle which was being waged be 
tween the Pope and the Germans for the regency of the Two 
Sicilies. At first the war had gone against the Papal forces ; 
but the tide had turned with the advent in 1202 of Walter 
de Brienne, Prince of Taranto, to whom Innocent III had 
entrusted his cause. It was, however, a desperate conflict, 
waged by brave and fearless leaders on both sides. 



i 



soldier ; he was a hero fighting for the Church and Italian 

1 1 Celano, 3. 

tPostpaucos vero annos "after a few years," says the Legend of the 
Three Companions, in introducing the story of the journey to Apulia, after 
relating the incident of Francis imprisonment. It was probably in 1205 that 
the events which follow took place. 

2 



18 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSISI 

liberty against the hated German. 1 Stirred by the trouba 
dours song, soldiers from all parts of Italy flocked to the 
Norman s banner, partly for the glory of the adventure, 
partly for the material gain which was sure to accrue to a 
successful army ; and some of them had already gained re 
nown and the worship of the aspirants for knightly honours. 

Francis thoughts must often have turned to the southern 
battlefields, as he dreamed of the realization of his romance 
of chivalry. The setting out of a certain unnamed noble of 
Assisi to join the Papal army in Apulia now quickened his 
decision. 

He too would go to the war and, God willing, gain his 
knighthood in the following of a Count Gentile : a captain, 
doubtless, of some fame, though his exploits are not men 
tioned by Francis biographers. 2 Now having determined 
upon his course, Francis set about equipping himself in a 
fashion befitting the magnificence of his ambition ; so that 
his array outshone in splendour that of his noble companion 
in arms though he too was a man of wealth and fashion. 3 

The day of departure was at hand and Francis was 
already delighting in the glory of his newly bought equip 
ment, when he happened to fall in with a knight whose 
shabby dress betokened a straitened poverty. And this to 
Francis seemed a great shame, that one who belonged to so 
high a profession should be clothed so meanly. Straightway 
he made over his own gorgeous mantle and tunic and all his 
costly apparel to the poor knight. 4 

Full of the glory of his coming adventures Francis that 

1 The Southern Italians, however, resented being ruled by a foreigner, for 
Walter de Brienne was appointed not only commander of the forces, but 
Justiciar of Apulia. Of. A. Luchaire, Innocent III, Borne et ritalie, p. 190 
seq. 

2 The Leg. 3 Soc. says expressly that the Count was named Gentile, from 
whom Francis desired to receive knighthood. Lemonnier and Jorgensen sup 
pose that the name Gentile was merely a name of honour, and that Walter 
de Brienne himself is to be understood. But there were several Counts 
Gentile, whose names are recorded in contemporary documents; one of them, 
Count Gentile of Manapelli, was instrumental in defeating the Germans at 
Palermo in July, 1200. Cf. P. Sabatier, Vie de S. F. p. 19, n. 2. 

3 1 Celano, 4. 4 II Celano, d ; 3 Soc. 6 ; Leg. Maj. i. 2. 



FKANCIS DBEAMS OF GLOKY AND FAME 19 

evening retired to rest, and as he slept he dreamed a sweet 
dream. Some one called him by his name and taking him, 
led him to a fair palace, set about with knightly arms, the resi 
dence of a beautiful bride ; and as he was gazing in admira 
tion and wondering to whom this palace belonged, his guide 
told him that it was for him and his followers. 1 Francis 
awoke, convinced that the dream was an indication of his 
destiny, and such was his manifest happiness that his friends 
were curious to know what new fortune had come to him. 
Francis replied : " I know of a surety that I shall become a 
great prince ", 2 So in the joy of his dream he set out on his 
way to Apulia. He came the first evening to the city of 
Spoleto at the southern end of the valley, where the moun 
tains take a bend towards the west : and there he put up 
for the night. Again the mysterious voice came to him ; 
but now he was but half asleep. And as he listened intently 
he heard : " Francis, whom is it better to serve, the lord or 
the servant?" And he wonderingly replied: "Surely it is 
better to serve the lord". "Why then," asked the voice, 
"dost thou make a lord of the servant?" Suddenly the 
light entered his soul and he replied humbly: "Lord, what 
dost Thou wish me to do? " " Keturn," said the voice, "to 
the land of thy birth and there it will be told thee what thou 
shalt do : for it may behove thee to give another meaning to 
thy dream." 

Thoroughly awake, Francis lay pondering upon what 
had happened to him. He had no doubt now that these 
voices were akin to those troubling thoughts which had come 
to him in his sickness ; and they were too real to be honestly 
disregarded. Sobered and serious, he arose at daybreak and 
without delay got on his horse and rocfe back to Assisi. He * 
had put his dream of secular glory behind him. As to the 
future he had no plans: he only knew that he must wait 

1 3 Soc. 5 ; I Celano, 5 ; II Celano, 6 ; Leg. Maj. i. 3. Celano in his 
Legenda Prima says Francis saw his father s house filled with arms ; but in 
Legenda Secunda he gives the same description as in 3 Socii. St. Bona- 
venture speaks of " a fair palace," but does not allude to the beautiful bride. 

2 3 Soc. 5. 

2* 



20 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSIST 

upon the word which was to come to him and make all 
things clear. That was all he was conscious of just now ; 
and with a magnificent simplicity of soul, he set himself to 
wait. There was no sadness in his returning : the glamour 
of yesterday had given place to a new serenity and a new 
joy ; he had not yet found his heart s desire, but he knew it 
would come to him in the mysterious future before which 
he was to wait. 1 

It bears witness to the sanity of Francis mind that he 
was willing to wait and that he attempted no sudden ill-con 
sidered break with the life he had hitherto been living. Upon 
his return he took up the threads of the old life where he 
had left them. He went back to his father s business, though 
with no greater enthusiasm than he had hitherto shown ; he 
took his place again amongst the youths of the city, who at 
once elected him captain of the revel, moved thereto, as the 
old chronicler reminds us, by the prodigality with which he 
had always contributed to their feasts. 2 But the revel gave 
him no longer the whole-hearted simple pleasure of a former 
day. 

He presided at the banquets his own purse provided, at 
which the fine city youths over-ate themselves and drank too 
much ; and when they could eat and drink no more and rose 
up and went forth into the streets singing riotously, Francis 
must lead the way with the wand of leadership in his hand, 
as the custom was. 3 Meanwhile in all the byways of the 
city was the ill-fed, naked crowd whose excitement was to 
witness the procession of the gorgeously- clad, gluttonous 
sons of noble and merchant : and Francis since his return 
from Spoleto was daily becoming conscious of the contrast 
between the life of these poor beggars and that of his own 
people. The sight of a beggar would now set struggling 
emotions which were a mystery to himself. More jbnd more, 
as the weeks_went by, he felt Jiimself becoming.^ stranger 
amongst his friends. He would still move amongst them 

1 3 Soc. 6 ; II Celano, 6 ; Leg. Maj. i. 3. 2 II Celano, 7. 

3 ibid. Celano evidently describes these civic carousals from personal 
knowledge or experience. 



FEANCIS DEEAMS OF GLOEY AND FAME 21 

exchanging witticisms and pleasantries ; he would still lead 
off the song and sit at the feast : but his heart was not in it 
all as it used to be. Oftentimes he sat at the board in an 
abstracted mood, and at the head of the riotous procession 
would walk as one in deep thought until aroused by some 
rude pleasantry from his companions. As time went on these 
abstracted moods became more prolonged and intent; he 
would even at times be as one unable to move or speak, so 
rapt was he in his own thoughts of the sweet mystery which 
was upon him. The revellers, noting these things, had a 
ready explanation : Francis must be in love. One day when 
he had fallen behind in one of his silent moods, his com 
panions turned back and taxed him with his delinquency. 
"Art thou in love, Francis?" they cried; "hast found a 
maiden to be thy wife, that thou must be always thinking 
of her charms and beauty? " Francis, aroused from his ab 
straction, replied with unexpected seriousness : " Yea, in truth 
I am thinking of taking a wife more noble and beautiful and 
richer than any ye have ever seen ". At which they laughed 
a coarse incredulous laugh. But Francis was thinking of the 
bride of his dream who had come to figure in his thoughts 
for the new life into which he was peering, and whom he 
afterwards came to know as the Lady Poverty. 1 It was his 
first confession of his love even to himself ; and from that 
moment, with a lover s humility, he began to wax worthless in 
his own eyes and to think bitterly of the wasted years, for so 
they seemed now, which had kept him from knowing his 
heart s desire. 

He became thenceforth even more silent and thoughtful 
and more and more sensitive to the spiritual world. Often he 
would withdraw from the society of his fellows and steal out 
of the city to be alone and to pray. He was yet shy of mani 
festing to others his secret ; but the distaste for the old life 
was becoming too much for him. Yet he was of that nature - 
which instinctively seeks companionship and a certain com 
prehending sympathy, and this need drew him frequently 
into visiting the poor. He no longer waited for them to come 

1 3 Soc. 7 and 13 ; I Celano, 7. 



22 LIFE OF ST. FRANCIS OF ASSISI 

seeking an alms ; he now sought them out, always taking 
with him money or food to relieve their needs, yet taking 
something even more precious, the sympathy of a soul itself 
lonely and in need. For in these months of spiritual travail 
he was living in a great loneliness. There was but one friend 
in the city, a young man about his own age, to whom he 
could bring himself to speak of the things which had come 
into his life : and even to him he could speak only shyly and 
in parables, telling him that he had discovered a treasure 
of great price and was seeking how to obtain possession of 
it. Sometimes he would take his friend with him on his 
walks outside the city and in his enigmatic way unbosom his 
searching thoughts. They gradually came to directing their 
steps to an ancient Etruscan tomb some distance off and in a 
lonely place. There Francis would bid his friend remain out 
side whilst he himself went in to pray. Those visits to the 
ancient tomb were Francis most intimate moments with God 
and his own soul. His friend, waiting outside, heard him at 
times crying aloud in his southern fashion for very anguish 
of soul : it was when the soul of Francis was being riven 
by a divine light which revealed him to himself and brought 
him to judgment, face to face with his destiny. At such 
moments he was in an agony of new desire and conscious 
helplessness. To add to his trial, his over-strained nerves 
would at times create imaginative horrors out of his moral 
fears. He saw himself becoming deformed, even as some of 
the poor beggars in the city, at the sight of whom he had 
always shrunk back with horror. He met such suggestions 
with pleading prayer and did not desist till he had found 
strength and comfort. But when he came out again into the 
sunlight his countenance would be haggard and drawn be 
cause of the pain he had suffered. One clear thought was 
gradually shaping itself amidst the ferment of spirit : he 
must abandon his accustomed comfort and luxury and ambi 
tion and go forth like Abraham of old amongst a strange people. 
That insistent calling was beating upon his spiritual sense ; 
it drew him with mysterious persuasion ; yet did he still hold 
back as one whose bonds are not yet broken, whose vision is 



FEANCIS DEEAMS OF GLOEY AND FAME 23 

not clear. 1 Who the friend was who stood by him in these 
difficult days and comforted him with a discreet sympathy, we 
know not. Some have surmised that it was that Elias who ~ ^ 
afterwards became Minister-General of the Franciscan Order ^ 
and the anti-type of Francis in Franciscan legend. 2 Were it *** 
so we could easily understand Francis attachment to Elias 
in the later days when this friend became to him the cause 
of many anxious hours. It is, however, only a fanciful sur 
mise. Whoever he was, whether Elias or another, may his 
memory be blessed for the sake of those first difficult days. 

In his perplexity Francis bethought him to undertake a 
pilgrimage to the tombs of the apostles. Year by year pil 
grims trod the white roads leading to Eome, carrying with Q 
them their miseries or fears or desires to the heavenly ap- , 
pointed shepherds of Christ s flock, whose bodies lay on the 
Vatican Hill. 

Francjs therefore joined the pilgrimage, having no doubt 
that the apostles would give him comfort and direction. He 
took with him rich offerings for the shrine such as in his in 
experience he thought all wealthy pilgrims took ; and great 
was his surprise and pain when he noticed, during his stay in 
the city, how meagre were their offerings. To him it seemed 
not merely a lack of generosity but a sort of treason thus to 
treat the chief pastors of souls. With a feeling of revulsion 
Francis turned from the niggardly pilgrims to the importu 
nate beggars who crowded about the doors of the basilica, 
and literally poured into their outstretched hands his ready 
alms. Beggars were having a strange fascination for him 
of late. He was beginning to feel a new sense of freedom 
in their presence. Suddenly one day as_he approached St. 
Peter s a quick resolve took possession of him. He would 
himself become a beggar for the day and learn by experience 
what the life must be. It would be more easily done here 

1 Cf. 3 Soc. 8 ; I Celano, 6 and 9. 

2 P. Sabatier, Vie de S. F. p. 22. The supposition, however, is unlikely. 
Had Elias been Francis first friend Celano would certainly have mentioned 
the fact in his Legenda Prima in which he constantly extols the merits of 
Elias. 



24 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSISI 

amongst a crowd of strangers : had he been at home he would 
have shrunk from the ridicule of his own class, for he was 
not yet master of himself. Oftentimes in the past months 
he had felt himself a coward and had sought the company of 
the poor by stealth, being still held by the conventions of his 
class. 

Here in Eome a lesser boldness was needed. Moreover, 
the pilgrimage and the freshness of thought which comes of 
a widening world and the journey to Kome was his first 
glimpse of the great world beyond his native province was 
giving him a grip of his own soul, bringing the issues of his 
mental struggle into greater clearness. Straightway he took 
a beggar aside and for a consideration obtained the loan of 
his clothes : and all that day he stood outside St. Peter s, clad 
as a beggar, asking alms of those who passed in and out. 
With the illusion of a strong imagination he was for the time 
a veritable beggar, waiting upon another s goodwill for bread 
and the courtesy of life, and sharing with his companions at 
the door their satisfactions and rebuffs. 1 In the evening he 
became again the son of Pietro Bernardone the rich mer 
chant ; but for the day he had been of the brotherhood of 
beggars, and as he went to his lodgings that night he felt 
that he had wandered further away from his father s house 
and found a new tie of kinship ; and he felt also that exalta 
tion of spirit which comes to a man when he has pitted his 
strength against his weakness or diffidence and come forth 
the victor : for his fastidiousness had kicked against the un 
seemly rags, and the feeling for his own class still had a 
subtle power over him. 2 

On his return to Assisi he carried with him this new feel 
ing of kinship with the poor. He was no longer content to 
go out and bestow an alms in secret : that now would have 
been a disloyalty. In some way he must proclaim his new 
fellowship. Fortunately his father was absent from home, 
probably on one of his long journeys to France : else might 
Francis story have moved more quickly than it did at this 
period, or at least with less idyllic grace. But Francis could 

1 II Celano, 8 ; 3 Soc. 10 ; Leg. Maj. i. 6. 2 Of. II Celano, 13. 



FEANCIS DEEAMS OF GLOEY AND FAME 25 

count upon his mother s tolerant sympathies. One day, to her 
surprise, she found the table loaded with bread and meat as for 
a large company. On asking whom the guests might be, 
Francis replied that it was a feast for the hungry. Then 
taking the food from the table he distributed it to the poor at 
the door. It was more neighbourly thus to feed them from 
his own table. 

But the day of days came to him out in the plain. He 
had been riding and was returning to the city when a leper 
stood in his way, supplicating an alms. At the sight of his 
loathsome disfigurement the very soul of Francis sickened, as 
it did in the presence of all ugly disease. At an earlier time 
he would have flung out his alms and passed quickly on. 
But to-day a great wave of pity swept over him, and would 
not let him pass on. He reined in his horse and dismounted, 
and as he courteously placed his alms in the beggar s hand, 
he took the hand and kissed it. Then clasping the leper in 
his arms, he himself received from the leper the kiss of peace. 
From that moment Francis never again looked back upon 
the old ways : in the leper s embrace he plighted his troth to 
the new life in which poverty and suffering were lords de 
manding his liege service. He had not yet found the Lady 
Poverty, but he had entered her domain and become a servant 
of her people : and for the present he was at peace. 

In his gratitude he now looked upon the lepers as his 
peculiar charge: he visited their settlements and brought 
them alms ; and always as he gave his alms he kissed their 
hands. 1 

1 3 Soc. 11 ; II Celano, 9 ; Leg. Maj. i. 5. Of. Testamentum S. Franc. 
in Seraph. Legist. Textus Originates (Quaracchi), p. 265. 



CHAPTEK III. 
HOW FRANCIS FOUND THE LADY POVERTY. 

Now all this while since that night of the mysterious voice 
at Spoleto, many months ago, Francis regarded himself as 
waiting upon the good-will of his Lord, Jesus Christ ; and 
whatever happened to him apart from his own seeking (and 
he sought but little of his own will these days), he took as 
coming from the Divine Will. He doubted not that Christ 
Himself had sent the leper across his path and had put it 
into his heart to embrace the leper as he did and thus find 
the dedicated life. There was yet a period of probation to be 
gone through before he would be fully initiated ; of that he 
was fully aware; but he was happy with "a sweetness of 
soul and body " at being enrolled amongst his Lord s servitors. 1 
His most imperious feeling now was one of intense loyalty 
to his Divine Master, which went with a shy worship of that 
new mystery of life which was gradually being revealed to 
him in his intercourse with the poor and suffering. He 
recognized clearly that this new life was the gift of the Lord, 
and that it must be gained in His service : it was in fact 
the kingdom which his Lord shared with His followers. 
Through all this kingdom, as he was coming to know it, he 
saw the resplendent figure of the Lord Christ reflected hrall : 
the beggar and the leper were touched with His majesty, and 
the earth they dwelt on, acquired a new sanctity because 
this glory of the Christ was upon them. And that was the 
singular thing about Francis turning towards religion : it did 
not raise a barrier between him and the earth, but the earth 

Vide Tcstamentum S. Franc. : " The Lord Himself gave to me, Brother 
Francis, thus to begin to do penance. . . . The Lord Himself led me amongst 
them [the lepers J and I showed mercy to them : and when I left them what 
had seemed bitter to me was changed into sweetness of body and soul." 

26 



HOW FEANCIS FOUND THE LADY POVEKTY 27 

itself became transformed in his sight and gave him a new 
joy. In earlier days he had regarded it with a certain eager 
reverence as the scene and circumstance of high chivalry: 
now he looked upon it with even greater reverence because 
of this new life revealed in it, and found in it an even greater 
joy. Such an attitude of mind would hardly have been toler 
ated by the professional religious reformers who demanded 
an utter negation of present joy and held out as a reward 
some distant joy in another world. Instinctively Francis 
avoided their counsels : their theories had no relation to 
the realities into which he had been caught up. Occasionally 
in moments of acute doubt, he sought advice from the bishop, 
and came away strengthened and comforted. 1 Doubtless the 
bishop thought it would all end in Francis becoming a monk 
or entering the priesthood : but whatever he thought, he was 
sympathetic and helpful and did not exert any undue pressure 
to determine the course of Francis life. But for the most 
part Francis kept his own counsel : yet humbly and without 
deliberate contradiction of other people s ways, being wholly 
wrapt up in the mystery of his own life and in the expectancy 
of his Lord s commands. This simplicity of soul was prob 
ably the safeguard of his truthfulness and sincerity, as well 

as the evidence. 

f~^ 

So we come to those final stages by which Francis reached ri\rv 
his great decision. He was walking one day near the little 
church of San Damiano which stands on the slope of the hill 
outside the city walls as you follow the Via Francesca 2 looking 

towards Spello. The church was in a crumbling condition ; 3 

i 

J Cf. 3 Soc. 10; Spec. Perfect, cap. 10. Francis in the Spec. Perfect, 
cites as one reason of his great reverence for bishops, the kindness shown him 
by the bishop of Assisi "from the beginning of my conversion". Cf. Ada SS. 
Octob. n. p. 584. Bishop Guido was elected in 1204. Cf. Ughelli, Italia 
Sacra, I, p. 479, XV. 

2 The Via Francesca was one of the principal roads on the way between 
San Damiano and the Portiuncula, in the time of St. Francis. To-day it is a 
mere narrow path. The name, it may be remarked, was not called after St. 
Francis ; it existed before his day. 

3 According to Thode, Saint Francois d Assise et I Art Italien, n. p. 13, it 
was already in existence in 1030. It was one of those small churches, a 
nave without aisles, and rudely built of stone, which abound even to-day in 



28 LIFE OF ST. FEANCIS OF ASSISI 

no one seemed to have a care for it, and seeing this, Francis 
sense of reverence was troubled ; yet at the same time 
he felt strangely drawn to enter in. He followed the im 
pulse and went and prayed before the altar. Suddenly he 
heard a voice speaking as it seemed to him from the crucifix. 
" Francis," it said, " go and repair my church which as thou 
seest is wholly a ruin." At hearing the voice Francis was at 
first startled and terrified ; then he became conscious that it 
was his Lord who spoke to him ; and for a while he could 
neither speak nor move, but was as one lost to the things of 
sense : Jesus Christ, for whose word he had waited, had 
spoken. But he remembered that service was demanded of 
him and roused himself ; in abashed astonishment he replied : 
"Gladly, Lord, will I repair it". And then he felt a mar 
vellous love for the crucified Christ take possession of him, 
such a love as he had never felt before ; and he knew that for 
the sake of Him, he would willingly perform any service even 
to the death. 

He rose from his knees and went out of the church and 
found the priest who served it, sitting near by ; and he offered 
him a large sum of money, saying : "I pray thee, signore, to 
buy oil and keep a lamp always burning before the Crucified : 
and when this money is all expended, I will give thee more". 
Then he went on his way, lifted above himself and seeing 
Christ crucified, and hearing the Voice, and oblivious to all 
else : for the crucifix had become a Living Thing to his spirit, 
and the centre of all living things. His Lord the Master of 
his life and service was the Crucified, and He had made 
Himself known in that ruined church : and Francis was to 
repair the church. The facts shone with exuberant, insistent 
vitality. The esquire of the Crucified asked no questions, and 
formed no argument : his response was entire obedience and 
love. But that evening when Francis went back to the city, 
he too was already in some wise crucified in spirit, so wholly 
had he given his heart to his liege-lord. 1 

Italy. San Damiano still exists in almost primitive simplicity, but a side 
chapel was built in the seventeenth century to accommodate the famous crucifix 
carved by Fra Innocenzio di Palermo. 

1 II Celano, 10; 3 Soc. 13, 14; Leg. Maj. i. 5. 



HOW FKANCIS FOUND THE LADY POVEETY 29 

Without delay he set about his new service. He got to 
gether a goodly stock of stuffs from his father s store, and 
mounting his horse, having first made the sign of the cross, 
he set off for Foligno, the busy city in the plain, where mer 
chandise would always find a ready sale ; and there he sold 
not only the stuffs but also the horse, and then walked back 
the ten miles to Assisi, carrying the money he had gained ; 
and this he brought at once to the priest at San Damiano. 
Bending low, he kissed the priest s hand and offered him the 
money for the repairing of the church, and begged, as a favour, 
that he might be allowed to dwell with him at San Damiano ; 
for he was eager to abide where his service was demanded, 
and he had now no stomach for life in his father s house. 
The priest was wholly unprepared for the turn events had 
taken ; and being a prudent man, but withal kindly, he re 
fused to accept so large a sum of money, but consented to 
Francis remaining with him. Possibly the priest had heard 
talk about Francis strange behaviour since his return from 
the pilgrimage to Borne, and was doubtful as to how it would 
all end : possibly he did not see the use of expending so much 
money on a crumbling way-side church, and preferred to 
spend his days in peace. At any rate, Francis could not pre 
vail upon him to take the money : so he flung it into a window 
sill in the church and left it there. 1 He did not go home but 
took up his abode there and then with the priest./ 

By this time, however, his father had returned to Assisi, 
and becoming alarmed at his son s absence, after a few days 
he set about making inquiries and at length learned the 
whole story of the sales at Foligno and how his son was now 
turned acolyte or hermit at San Damiano. And at that 
Pietro Bernardone was beside himself with sorrow and anger. 
Calling together a party of his friends he set out to put an 
end to this foolery. But some one of the household had 
already warned Francis, and when Pietro arrived at the little 
sanctuary, his son had gone, no one knew whither. 

Francis, you see, was not yet a perfect hero. He had no 
thought of surrendering before the violence of his father nor 

l l Celano, 8-9; II Celano, 11 ; 3 Soc. 16; Leg. Maj. n. 1. 



30 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSISI 

of going back upon his plighted fealty to the Crucified who 
had called him ; but he was not yet man enough to stand his 
ground and meet the assault. He shrank before the ridicule 
which he knew would be heaped upon him, and equally be 
fore the violence, which in filial reverence and in conscience 
he could not return ; and even more than from the certain 
violence, he shrank from his father s curse which he knew 
would surely fall upon him if he held out : and there is no 
thing an Italian dreads more even to-day than the parental 
curse. But besides all this he was yet shy of confessing be 
fore the world this new loyalty which possessed him : even 
as every honest man is shy of confessing his heart s love. 
He was but a neophyte and was lacking yet the full strength 
and confidence of a man. From his first settling down at 
San Damiano he had dreaded his father s coming and had 
bethought him of a cave into which he might safely retreat, 
and thither he had fled when the warning came : and there 
he remained in hiding for a whole month, so full of terror 
that he hardly ever ventured out into the sunlight. Food 
was brought to him secretly by the only friend who knew the 
place of his retreat. 

These days, however, were not without a joy of their own. 
In the dark solitude he held constant communion of soul with 
his Divine Lord : new light poured into his mind and 
strength into his heart ; at times he would shrink into him 
self as he thought of the stormy trouble awaiting him ; at 
other times he was exalted with his newly-found happiness. 
But the day came when he felt it too great an indignity to the 
Lord he served, thus to lurk in dark corners for the fear of 
men. No true knight would shirk the combat nor refrain 
from open confession of his allegiance. He must live his life 
in the open and bear witness to his Lord, and if needs be, 
suffer in the doing. So one day, casting all care for himself 
upon the Lord he served, he issued forth from his cave and 
appeared in the streets of Assisi. He was much changed 
in appearance from the gay youth of the past. The mental 
struggle he had gone through and the fastings and bodily 
discomforts, had made him thin and emaciated and given his 



HOW FEANCIS FOUND THE LADY POVEETY 31 

face a deep pallor as of a corpse. The people meeting him 
were shocked : they thought he must verily have gone mad ; 
and with the cruelty which the curious often have, they 
taunted him upon his madness and jeered at him. And as 
Francis, taking it all in the spirit of the Crucified, made no 
spirited retort, the gathering crowd took courage and flung 
mud and stones at him. Still no sign of anger escaped him. 
In truth he was feeling a curious gladness in this baptism of 
fire, all the more conscious because of the fears which had 
held him back this month past. 

But Assisi is but a small city and the news of his son s 
reappearance and the reception he was getting, swiftly reached 
the ears of Pietro Bernardone, and a new sense of humiliation 
was added to his anger. He ran out into the streets and 
seized his son and carried him back to his house, meanwhile 
giving vent to his fury in imprecations and good moralities : 
then when they reached the house, he gave Francis a sound 
flogging and finally locked him in a dark room. In such wise 
did Pietro think to end this strange freak which was bringing 
ridicule upon his house. "When a few days later he had to 
go abroad on business, he took the precaution to secure his 
prisoner by putting manacles upon his hands and feet. In 
time, doubtless, Francis would come to his senses : if not, 
Pietro knew what he would do. Fortunately he had other 
sons of a less fantastic disposition, who might turn out good 
mercers and reputable citizens : there was, in particular, 
Angelo, the youngest son, a level-headed youth. 1 Yet it went 
sore with Pietro that Francis his eldest, the pride of his am 
bitions, should have turned such a failure. And being an 
unimaginative man he could make no allowance for the per 
sonal equation of temperament or character ; he could only 
see wilful opposition to his own designs and a disregard of 
the family honour and the flouting of unusual opportunities 
for a successful career. It did not occur to him that his 

1 Angelo in fact seems to have continued the family tradition and to have 
taken his place amongst the notable citizens. He had a son who joined the 
Penitential fraternity, as is evident from a legal document published by Cristo- 
fani, in which he is styled Picardus contitwns. Of. Cristofani, op. cit. pp. 50-51. 



32 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

treatment of his son was selfish and unduly severe : rather 
did he curse the fates which allowed this misfortune to hap 
pen to himself and his house. His pride in his family was 
hurt, and that was the bitter thing to Pietro who had looked 
to make the house of Bernardone respected in the commune. 

The Lady Pica, however, took a more directly personal 
view of the matter, as women are apt to do. She understood 
her husband s disappointment, but she also knew and sym 
pathized with the romantic disposition of her boy, and in her 
heart she was glad that he had turned from the frivolities of 
the world to the service of God and the poor. Not that she 
altogether approved of his abandonment of his home: he 
might serve God and the poor without doing that. And being 
a dutiful wife she grieved over her husband s bitterness and 
yearned to bring father and son to some mutual accommodation. 
So when Pietro had departed she came to Francis and set 
forth her thoughts and pleaded tearfully that he should meet 
his father s wishes as it were half-way. But there was 
that in the Lady Pica s heart which made her but a poor 
advocate against the imperious demands of Francis calling : 
and she ceased to plead and went over to his side. Francis 
must after all be true to the Divine Voice. 

When Pietro Bernardone came back from his journey, he 
found Francis was gone ; for the Lady Pica had freed her boy 
from his chains and sent him forth with a mother s blessing 
to obey the call of his soul. And at that Francis had returned 
to his lodging at San Damiano. 

In the bitterness of his heart Pietro Bernardone cursed 
his wife ; then in a blind fury went off to find his son, think 
ing still to bring him home and cure him of his folly, or at 
the worst to drive him from the city and its neighbourhood. 
But as he approached San Damiano, to his astonishment 
Francis came out to meet him, bearing himself confidently 
and without fear. Pietro, however, determined to make a 
brave show of his authority : harsh words and blows fell upon 
the son ; but there was no shrinking now. Francis suffered 
meekly yet stoutly : for the sake of Christ who had called him, 
he would suffer any injury ; but he would not betray his soul 



HOW FBANCIS FOUND THE LADY POVEBTY 33 

by returning to the world s ways. And at last Pietro de 
sisted from blows and objurgations and came to bargaining. 
Francis should be free to go his own evil ways if he would 
renounce his inheritance and restore the money he had taken 
at Foligno. 

But here there was a difficulty. Francis would willingly 
renounce his claims to his father s property ; but the money 
he had received at Foligno was no longer his to restore ; he 
had given it to the Church for the repair of the building of 
San Damiano and the relief of the poor. 

A bitter resolve was in the heart of Pietro Bernardone as 
he turned back and took his way towards the city. He would 
have his own to the last penny, but Francis should be no 
longer a son of his. He went at once, making no delay, to the 
palace of the commune in the great square and laid a claim 
before the consuls for a return of the money his son had taken 
and for his disinheritance ; and the consuls, knowing his 
trouble and willing to comfort so worthy a citizen, straight 
way sent a herald to cite Francis before the communal court. 
But the herald brought back word that Francis refused the 
summons, declaring that as a man dedicated to religion he 
was not subject to the civic authorities but only to the bishop. 
Thereupon, finding no help in the consuls, who were un 
willing to dispute the case with the Church, Pietro went to 
the bishop s court and lodged his complaint there. 

Now Bishop Guido was not always a man of peace and 
was quick to uphold the rights of the Church against any 
attempted infringement on the part of the citizens. But in 
this instance at least, he acted with irreproachable discretion. 
When Francis received the bishop s summons he answered : 
" I will come before the lord bishop gladly, for he is the father 
and lord of souls ". At the trial, the bishop bade Francis re 
store the money he had given to San Damiano, declaring with 
a certain aristocratic scorn : /" God does not wish His Church 
to be succoured with goods which perhaps are gotten by in 
justice ". Then he bade Francis have a stout heart and trust 
in the Lord and have no fear, for that God would provide for 
him in his necessities in return for the service of His Church. 

3 



34 LIFE OF ST. FEANCIS OF ASSIS1 

At this Francis was moved with gratitude, taking the words 
as a promise from God Himself to have a care of him. Rising 
up in the court he handed over the money and, as he did so, 
cried out : " My lord, not only the money which belongs to him, 
but also the clothes I wear, which are his, will I give back " : 
and there and then he took off his clothes, and laid them 
before the bishop. Standing naked except for a hair-shirt that 
he wore beneath his other garments, he turned to the people 
who stood about the court and called aloud : " Hear all of ye 
and understand : until now I have called Pietro Bernardone 
my father ; but because I propose to serve the Lord I return 
him his money, concerning which he was troubled, and all 
the clothes I had of him : for now I wish to say : Our Father 
Who art in heaven, and not, father Pietro Bernardone ". 

Never before perhaps had such an act of renunciation 
been made in that court. The bishop wept and so did all 
the people, as much in admiration as in pity, because of the 
simple sincerity of the act. Pietro, steeling his heart, 
gathered up the money and clothes, and went out. The people 
seeing him take away the clothes, looked after him with ex 
clamations of anger : but as the chronicler says : " His father 
was inflamed with fury and with an exceeding sorrow ". 
There was no triumph in Pietro s heart as he left the court : 
he went back to his house conscious that the glamour of the 
high position he had once thought to hold amongst its neigh 
bours, was gone. He might indeed leave to his sons who 
remained with him a wealthy business and a standing in 
the commune : but he had dreamt of more than this when 
he had watched Francis playing the prince amongst the city s 
youth : and that dream would never lighten his blood again. 
He returned home a hard and bitter man ; yet not without 
his sorrow. 

Meanwhile the bishop was befriending Francis as a new 
born son of the Church. In compassion he had taken the 
young man to his arms and wrapt him about with the folds 
of his mantle until a farm-labourer s tunic was brought from 
one of the bishop s servants. This Francis put on, first 
chalking it with the sign of the cross. Then he took his 



HOW FKANCIS FOUND THE LADY POVEETY 35 

leave, nor did the bishop seek to prevent him, and for that 
too Francis was grateful. 1 

It was in truth his marriage day : at last he had found 
and wedded the Lady Poverty for whom he had been search 
ing with constant loyalty since he had heard the Voice at 
Spoleto. He wondered, perhaps, as men are apt to wonder, 
that he had been so long unknowing, seeing how near she 
had been to him all these days, but not yet understanding that 
his blindness was due in part to Poverty s own leading of her 
lover. For one must needs first learn the individual graces 
and values of one s ideal and test one s capacity for worship 
in the presence first of this grace and then of that, and 
moreover understand something of the sacrifice which wor 
ship entails, before one can truly give oneself to the ideal as 
a unity or personality. 

All his life, had Francis but known it, he had been wor 
shipping the Lady Poverty in an incomplete way. In the 
days when he followed the troubadour and sang their songs 
in joyous abandonment, he had been worshipping, in some 
distant way, the mystery of the actual world of men and 
things, which afterwards was one of his joys in his converse 
with poverty ; his very prodigality at the civic feast was akin 
to the open-handedness of the poverty which in later years 
he defined as in part " a free giving " ; 2 in his intercourse 
with the poor when he made himself their friend rather than 
their patron, he had bowed before the spirit of comradeship 
and the quick understanding of misery, which he came to re 
cognize as a property of his ideal. For all this varied under 
standing he had been grateful and worshipful : yet did the 
ultimate worship come to him only on the day of his disin 
heritance when his soul and body were set free from the ties 
of wealth and secular ambition : and in this freedom he knew 

that at last his heart had found its deepest desire. That 

freedom in which were gathered all his soul s inspirations as 

*! Celano, 13-15; II Celano, 12; 3 Soc. 16-20; Leg. Maj. n. 2-4. 
The legend of the Anonymus Perusinus says that Frauds disinheritance took 
place on 16 April, 1207. Cf. Ada, SS. Octob. n. p. 572. 

2 Of. I Celano, 17. 

3* 



36 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

in their home, was the Lady Poverty ; that and nothing 
less. And now you ""kno w perhaps why the poverty which 
was Francis ideal love, is styled " the Lady Poverty ". It is 
because of the nobility of life which she brought to Francis : 
her simple love of God and His creatures, her generosity and 
pitifulness, her sense of kinship with all the world which 
acknowledges " our Father in heaven " : all which things, the 
lust of wealth and the ambition for power and honours are 
apt to pass by as of no account. 1 

So Francis had become his own man, so far as the world 
saw : but in truth he was the lover of his ideal Poverty. 

1 Concerning the significance of Franciscan poverty, cf. The Lady 
Poverty, a translation by Montgomery Carmichael of the Sacrum Commer- 
cium S. Francisci cum Domina Paupertate; cf. also St. Francis and Poverty, 
by the present writer. 




ABOVE SAX DAMIAXO 



CHAPTEE IV. 
FRANCIS RECEIVES HIS KNIGHTHOOD OF THE CROSS. 

FRANCIS went back to San Darniano, but he could not at 
once settle himself there. For awhile he must leave Assisi 
and its neighbourhood and be alone with his own soul. He 
was yet somewhat dazed by this freedom which had come to 
him, and the fullness of life which it brought. He must have 
time to realize his happiness and to get accustomed to this 
new liberty. Quite what it all meant he did not even yet 
know. Only this was he certain of, that he was now 
Christ s servitor, acknowledged as such by the Church, and 
that Christ had called him to a life of blissful poverty un 
known in the world where men bartered away their souls 
freedom for material gain and secular ambition. This little 
church of San Damiano was waiting to be repaired, and 
across the woods the lepers, his new friends, would be ex 
pecting him. But these must wait for a time. 

He set out over the hills which lay to the north beyond 
Monte Subasio. It was the spring-time when the fields and 
the woods and all the earth is instinct with new life, and the 
air is still pure from the winter s frosts and rains and fragrant 
with the scent of the spring vegetation. High up in the 
mountains the snow had not yet melted in the hollows and 
nooks where the shadows mock the sun, but upon the plain 
and face of the hills was a virginal warmth. As he went 
along, now with a quickened step, now at more leisurely pace, 
there was joy in the heart of Francis. The friendly earth 
had no jar upon his happiness : it too was young and free 
and vital as he. Instinctively he recognized the comradeship 
of the mountain heights and the deep ravines and the 
shadowy woods, and of the bare rugged slopes, so strong and 

37 



38 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSIST 

bracing, and yet revealing a tenderness where the wild flowers 
nestle in the rocky soil. And as he went he sang, not in his 
native tongue but in the musical language of the Prove^al 
troubadour. 

So he had come to the heights on the left bank of the 
river Chiagio where the hills begin to decline towards Gubbio, 
a perilous lonely place where the traveller must beware of 
the robbers who infested the neighbourhood, claiming toll 
from those who journeyed between the marches of Ancona 
and the cities of Umbria. Suddenly he was stopped by a 
party of these marauders, who demanded who he might be. 
" What is that to you ? " replied Francis. " But know I am 
a herald of the Great King." He uttered in simple sincerity 
the thought which was in his mind. With ferocious humour 
the robbers stripped him of his labourer s tunic and tossed 
him into a ditch in which the snow still lay. "Lie there, 
thou fool herald ! " they jibed, and so left him. 1 

Francis picked himself up gaily : it was an adventure in 
this new quest. But he was almost naked and must needs 
find some garment to clothe him. Not far away was a 
monastery : thither he went and offered himself as a servant, 
hoping thus to obtain both food and clothing. The monks 
put him to assist in the kitchen, giving him food but refusing 
him any garment. In sheer necessity therefore, but witb no 
ill-will, Francis left them after a few days. 2 His thoughts 
turned now towards a friend of former time who lived in the 
city of Gubbio, and thither he made his way. His friend re 
ceived him kindly. After all it was not a rare occurrence for 
men to embrace a religious penitential life, and a friend at a 
distance might well take a more detached view of a man s 

1 1 Celano, 16 ; Leg. Maj. n. 5. Tradition places the scene of this inci 
dent at Caprignone. Of. Lucarelli, Memorie e Guida Storica di Gubbio, p. 
583 seq. ; P. Nicola Gavanna, Jj Umbria Francescana, p. 194 seq. 

2 It is impossible to identify this monastery, as there were several monas 
teries in the neighbourhood; San Verecondo at Vallingegno, S. Pietro in 
Vigneti ; whilst local tradition claims the incident for Santa Maria della 
Kocca near Valfabbrica. It is well to know that the prior of the monastery 
later on, when Francis had become famous, apologized for the lack of charity 
(I Celano, 16). 



HIS KNIGHTHOOD OF THE CEOSS 39 

doings than could be demanded from his daily companions 
and neighbours. Anyway, Francis was given a dress similar 
to that worn by hermits and pilgrims 4-~a tunic with .aieathern 
girdle, and shoes and a staffJ^He then made his way back , 
again to Assisi. 

At San Damiano the priest made him welcome, and with 
a simple courtesy bade him share what shelter and food was 
his. 2 Francis now set himself to fulfil the service which the 
Voice had given him to do. He did not yet realize the larger 
significance of the bidding to "go and repair My Church ". 
That is to come to him later on and then he will know that py^ 
it is the Church of living souls which he is to help restore to 
its strength and beauty. At present he takes the words to 
refer merely to the crumbling sanctuary in which he heard 
the Voice. As he looked back across the intervening weeks 
to the day when the command had come to him, a whole age 
seemed to have passed as in a moment of eternity, for there 
are happenings in the soul s experience which are as the 
moments of eternity, when the clear light leaps suddenly 
from out the dim glimmerings of long years. It seemed 
strange to him now that he should have thought to buy the 
materials for the repairing of the Church with his father s 
money. That money, and all the life with which it was as 
sociated, was now to him so unreal. Only his blindness could 
have made him think to fulfil his service with such a begin 
ning. His work and all his life must needs be his homage 
to that noble Poverty which had come to him. With a light 
heart he appeared for the first time in his native city as a 
beggar. He wanted oil to replenish the lamp which he had 
lit before the crucifix that day of the Voice. But as he drew 
near to the house where he had thought to beg the oil, he 
saw a party of his former friends making merry in the door 
way ; and at the sight of them his courage failed him, and all 
the dignity of his new manhood with which he had started 

1 1 Celano, 16 ; Leg. Maj. n. G. According to tradition the friend was a 
Frederigo Spadalunga, upon the site of whose house it is said the great church 
of San Francesco was afterwards built. Of. G. Mazzatinti in Miscell. Franc. 
Vol. V, p. 7G seq. 

2 Of. 3Soc. 21. 



40 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSIST 

on his quest, seemed to shrink within him. He drew back 
and went another way. But the weakness did not last long. 
Ashamed of his cowardice he retraced his steps, and walking 
into the midst of the party he told them to look upon a 
coward who had run away in shame. Then boldly he 
begged of them some oil, falling as he did so into the lan 
guage of Provence : and with the hardly earned oil he re 
turned to San Damiano, feeling at once the humiliation and 
joy of the day.* After this he was to be seen frequently in 
the city, begging stones and mortar and whatever he needed 
for the rebuilding of the church. As he went through the 
streets he chanted a rhythm in the Provenc/al tongue : " Who 
will give stones for the renewing of San Damiano ? whoso 
gives one stone shall have one reward ; whoso gives two stones 
shall have two rewards ; whoso gives three stones shall have 
three rewards ". Some who heard him jeered at him as a 
man gone mad, but others more kindly gave him what he 
asked for ; and Francis with his load would toil back to his 
sanctuary. 2 

With the aid of the friendly peasants he set to work upon 
the church, borne up in the heavy labour to which he was 
unused, by the great happiness in his soul. At times people 
from the city or travellers would stop to pass the greetings 
of the day and gossip with the builders. Francis, sociable 
and generous, would sometimes bid them come and take a 
hand at the work. " Come and help us in our work," he 
would say, " for this church of San Damiano will one day 
be a convent of ladies whose life and fame will glorify our 
heavenly Father in all the world." 3 From this saying, it is 
evident that Francis in his hours of solitary meditation and 
in his labour, was already receiving premonitions of the larger 
work before him : but the future was in God s Hands, and 
Francis was happy in the work of the present. 

Day by day he worked away at the walls ; but meanwhile 

1 3 Soc. 24 ; II Celano, 13. 

2 3 Soc. 21 ; II Celano, 13 ; Leg. Maj. n. 7. 

3 3 Soc. 24; Testamentum S. Clara in Seraph. Legisl. Textus Originates, 
p. 274. 



HIS KNIGHTHOOD OF THE CEOSS 41 

he did not forget his friends the lepers. Part of his time he 
gave to their service, either at the leper settlement at Santa 
Maddalena, or at the hospital of San Salvatore where the 
Crucigeri, or Cross-bearing brothers, took them in and nursed 
them. And ever his reverence and love for the lepers seemed 
to grow in him. One day he met a leper on the road who 
was coming back from a pilgrimage to the tombs of the Apostles 
in Eome, whither he had gone to beseech for a cure of his 
disease. His face was eaten away and he was pitiful to look 
upon. Won by Francis brotherly sympathy, the poor sufferer 
threw himself upon the ground to kiss the imprint of his feet, 
delicately avoiding touching the person of his friend. But 
Francis, much moved by this act of courtesy, bent and took 
the man in his arms and kissed him on the mouth. At the 
kiss, says Saint Bonaventure, the leprosy disappeared. 1 

But often at the close of day Francis was spent with his 
labours and over-tired. So delicately nurtured as he had 
been, not even his new-born happiness and love could 
altogether uphold his physical strength. And the priest, 
seeing him thus utterly worn, would grow anxious and fear 
ful. In his solicitude he began to prepare more appetizing 
foods to tempt the young neophyte to eat after his day s 
work. At first Francis accepted this kindness with a simple 
gratitude ; till one day he began to feel a danger to his voca 
tion in the priest s thoughtful care of him, and he took fright, 
being mindful of his natural inclination for things delicate 
and tasteful. Having left the luxuries of the world he might 
yet enslave himself to the simple comforts of this priest s 
house and lose his soul s freedom and become a traitor to the 
poverty he had come to love. "Not everywhere Francis," 
he argued with himself, " will you find men to minister to 
your wants as does this good priest : this is not the life of one 
who professes poverty ; nor does it behove thee to get accus 
tomed to such things, else wilt thou after awhile return to the 
things thou hast cast behind and once more run after de 
licacies. Kise up thou lazy one and go begging from door 
to door the leavings of the table." So as one in danger of 

1 Leg. Maj. n. 6 ; cf . I Celano, 17. 



42 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSISI 

turning recreant, he went next day into the city, carrying a 
dish ; and the citizens humouring his will, gave him the 
scraps from their tables, so that his dish was filled. But 
when Francis came to eat of it, his ingrained daintiness 
kicked, nor at first could he constrain himself to eat. Then 
he did battle with himself ; he recalled to mind the poverty 
of Christ and the hardships of the poor and his own sworn 
allegiance ; and in the end his loyalty conquered. He made 
his meal of the mess of broken victuals, even with something 
of an appetite, for he began to feel in the eating a strange 
spiritual joy. This meal became to him a sort of sacramental 
communion, bringing him into closer kinship with the multi 
tude who depend for their daily bread upon the goodwill of 
men and with those whose generosity was feeding him, and 
with the Lord Christ who is at once the Lord of rich and 
poor. And over all this great human family into which he 
felt himself caught up, lay the bright mystery of the Divine 
Providence to whose care he had committed himself on the 
day of his disinheritance. In the goodwill of men upon 
whom he had no claim beyond the claim of his human ne 
cessity, he saw at once the symbol, and in some sense the 
fulfilment, of the solicitude of Him Who sends down His rain 
upon the just and the unjust with no grudging hand : and 
this seemed to him now a duty, that as he had cast his care 
upon that Divine bounty he must also trust himself to the 
goodwill and bounty of man and all creation. It were no 
new thing to him to play the part of the generous giver : 
that he had done all his life and would continue to do with 
all the means he had : and this too he considered a mark of 
noble manhood and a duty of honour for all the children of 
God. 1 But in his dependence upon the goodwill of men he 
found a more intimate sense of God s Fatherhood and of the 
encircling bond of kinship which makes all the world a family : 
and for this reason he henceforth regarded the beggar, in his 
utter dependence, with an immense reverence as one who 
held in his condition the secret of that active love which gives 
a man the full freedom of the family of God and makes the 

1 Cf. I Celano, 17. 



HIS KNIGHTHOOD OF THE CKOSS 43 

wide earth one domestic hearth. In the same way he came 
to reverence all weak and helpless things. It would not be 
easy to construct an economic system upon this worship of 
the beggar which now became a part of Francis life : for 
you would need to work into the system the religious faith 
and high qualities of heart and the soaring idealism, which 
gave to this worship its equipoise and perfect sanity. More 
over it must be remembered that Francis willingness to 
receive from others was indissolubly wedded to a readiness to 
give a combination of qualities not always linked together. 
But as Francis would have told you, he who would accept in 
the spirit of brotherhood the gift of another, must place no 
fence around his own property. He must himself be a ser 
vant to others, before he can rightly accept another s service. 
Good service must go with the questing for alms ; else do the 
alms become a defrauding of the giver, a species of rapine 
and a blasphemy against the Providence which inspires a 
generous soul. Francis never spared the idler who lived at 
ease on others gifts. Hence in after years when disciples 
came to him, he was insistent on the moral obligation of 
labour and the service of one s neighbour : just as in these 
first days of his alms-seeking, he comes to the city from his 
toiling upon the walls of San Damiano and the nursing of 
the lepers. Only whilst he gives his own service he will 
bargain for no wage but be wholly dependent upon his neigh 
bour s good-will and God s over-ruling providence. 1 True, 
he might upon this same ground have accepted the kindly 
meals offered him by the priest : but Francis was hungering 
for the uttermost of poverty and careful for the freedom of 
his soul : and he feared lest the simple comfort and regular 
provision of the priest s house should make him slack in his 
spiritual quest and hold him back from his new-found liberty. 
So with heroic resolve he took upon him the estate of the 
beggar in the street. And would he have been the Francis 
that we love, had he done less ? 

From that day Francis, begging his bread from door to 

1 Of. Saint Francis and Poverty by the present author : and also St. 
Francis of Assist, Social Reformer, by Fr. Leo Dubois. 



44 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

door, became a familiar figure in the streets of Assisi. His 
daily round was not without its humiliation and suffering. 
What he felt most keenly was the bitterness of his father. 
Pietro Bernardone never met his son in the street but he 
cursed him. This business of going abegging for his bread 
was the last indignity Francis had heaped upon the proud 
spirit of his house. Very bitter after all was Pietro s lot : 
all his canons of respectability were being openly set at nought, 
and all the sacred prejudices of his class being violated by this 
son of his, whom he might disinherit and disown, but whom 
the people, and still more he himself, would always remember 
as his son. He could cheat neither his memory nor his heart 
by the blatant act of disinheritance : but as the sapient old 
chronicle remarks, " because he had loved his son much he 
was now ashamed of him and did much grieve over him "- 1 

One day Francis, quivering under Pietro s curse, sought 
out a simple beggar man. " Come and accompany me on my 
quests," he said, " and I will give thee a share in the alms I 
receive. And when thou shalt see my father curse me, I on 
my part will say to thee : bless me, my father ; and thou 
shalt make the sign of the cross over me in my father s stead ! " 
At the next meeting of father and son, when Pietro uttered 
his usual curse, the beggar made the sign of blessing as had 
been agreed. Then Francis turned to his father: " Believe 
you not," he said, " that God can give me a father to bless 
me against your curses ? " Others of his family affected to 
take him less seriously. One cold winter s morning one of 
his brothers, in company with a friend, came upon Francis 
very barely clad; and the brother said to his friend: "Go 
and ask Francis to sell us a drop of his sweat ". Francis 
overheard the remark, and laughed aloud. " Nay," he replied 
in French, " I sell it more dearly to my Lord." 2 

So the days went by. Francis was gradually learning the 
lesson of his calling. In the hard realities of those days of 
physical discomfort and fatigue and personal humiliation, he 
was shedding the last illusions of his upbringing, and gaining 
the experience with which the poor and helpless are so in- 

1 3 Soc. 23. a 3 Soc. 23 ; II Celano, 12. 



HIS KNIGHTHOOD OF THE CKOSS 45 

timately familiar. His comfort came to him in his long hours 
of communion with his Divine Master, when his new experi 
ences became transfused with a spiritual glory, and be began 
to see the trace of the Eedeemer of the world in the world s 
sorrow and hardship and contradictions : and this made his 
new life very sweet to him ; for everywhere he began to find 
the presence of his Lord, and the earth in its commingling of 
sorrow and beauty, of goodness and sin, became to him a 
veritable crucifix. This transfigurement of the very earth 
was indeed the joy and wonderment of these days of purga 
tion, and, as he afterwards confessed, the singular dower of 
his Lady Poverty. 1 

The rebuilding of San Damiano being at length completed, 
Francis set to work upon another crumbling chapel dedicated 
to St. Peter which stood some little distance from Assisi, but 
the exact site of which is now not known. 2 Then when his 
work here was finished, he turned to another wayside chapel 
which too was in need of repairs, and to which his heart 
went out with a peculiar yearning, for it was dedicated to the 
Virgin Mother of God and about it were told strange stories 
of angelic visitants. It was known as the chapel of Santa 
Maria della Porziuncola Saint Mary of the Little Portion. 
How it came by its name nobody can tell with any certitude, 3 
though in after years a story was told which may have had 
its origin in a local tradition. In the days of St. Cyril the 
bishop of Jerusalem, the story goes, four pilgrims left Pales 
tine to visit the shrines of the Apostles at Eome and after 
wards by the advice of the Pope they came seeking a hermit 
age in Umbria where they might peacefully serve God ; and 

1 Of. Fioretti, cap. 12. 

2 ICelano, 21; Leg. Maj. n. 7. Celano says the Church was near the 
city ; but St. Bonaventure says it was further off than San Damiano. 

3 The origin of the title " de Portiuncida " is disputed. Some say it was 
given to the chapel because of the straitness of the ground given to the Bene 
dictines when they built the chapel ; others, that the title was taken from 
another chapel built in the neighbourhood of Subiaco. Cf. P. Edouard 
d Alencon, Des Origines de VEglise de la Partiuncula. The first known 
mention of the name of the Porziuncola is in a legal document of 1045, dis 
covered by Froudini in the archives of the Cathedral of Assisi. Cf. P. 
Edouard d Alencon L Abbaye de Saint-Benoit ait Mont Soubase, p. 18, n. 1 



46 LIFE OF ST. FEANCIS OF ASSISI 

they came to this wood near Assisi and built themselves a 
chapel and four huts. In memory of the land they came 
from, they dedicated the chapel under the title of Saint Mary 
of Jehosaphat. They were holy men, and the spot they chose 
was holy ; for often in the chapel were heard the voices of 
angels praising God. But after a time they bethought them 
of their native land, and first burying a relic of our Lady s 
sepulchre beneath the altar of the chapel, they returned 
to Palestine. But the angels loved the chapel and continued 
to visit it and sing the praises of God there ; and from time 
to time a hermit would come and dwell by the chapel ; but 
more often it was deserted. Then came Saint Benedict, the 
father of monks, passing upon a time through Umbria, and 
chancing upon the chapel he discovered its holiness and had 
it restored. And he went and begged a small plot of ground 
adjoining the chapel and built a cell there : and because of the 
gift of land, he renamed the chapel, Saint Mary of the Little 
Portion. And he sent monks thither from the great monas 
tery of Monte Cassino. But the monks after many years 
built a monastery on Monte Subasio and forsook the chapel 
in the plain. 1 Be the truth of this story what it may, the 
chapel was undoubtedly very ancient. It stood in the plain, 
two miles from the city, and the intervening ground was 
covered with a dense wood. One might easily lose one s way 
in the shadowy paths which struck off from the Via Francesca, 
the highway that skirted the city walls. Quite possibly this 

1 Of. P. Edouard d Alencon, Des Origines de I Eglise de la Portiuncula. 
The legend is first found in Paradisus Seraphicus written by P. Salvator Vitalis 
and published at Milan in 1645, a work of no critical value. There is more 
over no historical record of any visit of St. Benedict to Assisi ; nor of the 
hermits who are supposed to have dwelt there. The chapel nevertheless was 
very ancient even in St. Francis time. Celano says it was " built in ancient 
days " " antiquitus constructa " (I Celano, 21), and St. Bonaventure writes 
that it was often visited by angels and that " from olden time it was called 
Saint Mary of the Angels " (Leg. Maj. n. 8 ; cf. n Celano, 19). Also, it 
belonged to the monks of Monte Subasio. Around these facts the legend may 
have been woven by the peasantry before it found its way into Vitalis 
book. It is not unlikely that hermits had at times dwelt there before St. 
Francis day, owing to the natural seclusion. The wood has long since given 
place to olive gardens and vineyards, but there is yet an indication of it out 
side the Porta di Mojano as you go towards the Church of San Damiano. 



HIS KNIGHTHOOD OF THE CEOSS 47 

chapel, so remote in its solitude yet so conveniently near the 
city, had been one of Francis retreats since first he began 
to withdraw from the world : but now as he worked at its 
walls the attraction grew upon him. It became like home to 
to him, did this leafy solitude with its little chapel : in some 
way it was a fitting symbol of the Lady Poverty. Not far 
aawy, less than half-an-hour s walk, were the leper settlements, 
and not much further off was the city : this human neigh 
bourhood was needful for the discharge of those neighbourly 
services he owed his fellow-man and for his beggar s quest : 
but here in the wood within hail of his fellow-men, he found 
what his soul delighted in the companionship of Nature un 
spoilt by the artifice of man. He loved the music in the trees 
when the wind rustled in the leaves, and the piping of the 
birds, and the movement of some animal in the undergrowth : 
all beasts of earth or air were dear to him. He loved too 
the lights and shadows and the wonderful growth of grass and 
tree. All these things seemed to him to lie close to the heart of 
created life and to the hand of the Creator, and they warmed 
his own heart and filled him with a great reverence. Some 
how too they seemed to him the dower of the Lady Poverty, 
even as did the beggar and the sufferer, because they lacked 
the artificiality of the world of prosperous men and therefore 
bespoke more truly and simply the providence of God. And 
then this chapel in the wood was as a witness to the nearness 
of heaven to the simple things of the earth. It was no strange 
thing to him that angels voices should mingle with the voices 
of the wood in the Creator s praise, and it was to him a sign 
of the nobility of his ideal Poverty that the Mother of God 
should have inspired men to dedicate this spot under her 
name, as though she would clothe the Lady Poverty in a 
mantle of her own glory. 1 

Thus in those quiet hours of labour and prayer Francis 
was learning the deeper values of the life he had taken. 

1 See the Salutatio Virtutum (Opuscula S. P. Franc., ed. Quarracchi, 
pp. 20-31), in praise of poverty and the sister virtues which St. Francis always 
especially associated with the virtue of poverty. This salutation is in several 
MSS. inscribed as a praise of the Blessed Virgin (cf. F. Paschal Robinson, Tlw 
Writings of St. Francis, p. 20, n. 6 ; Boehmer, Analekten, pp. vi and xxviii). 



48 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSISI 

The chapel of the Porziuncola was restored by the opening 
of the year 1209, and mass was now occasionally said there. 
Again Francis was awaiting the command of the Lord. The 
inward assurance which had bidden him set his hand to the 
repairing of the three deserted churches and find his vocation 
in that employment, had now gone, and his soul was again 
listening for the voice of the Lord which was his guidance. 
He knew the voice would come to him in God s own time 
and he knew the time was near. It was the moment between 
the dawn and the day, that moment never afterwards for 
gotten by the soul, so full is it of the breaking mystery of life. 
The revelation came, as it always comes, even to the expectant 
spirit, unexpectedly : and it came to him at the Porziuncola. 

One day towards the end of winter it was the feast of 
St. Mathias the Apostle, 24 February a priest was saying 
mass in the chapel and Francis was assisting, and the Gospel 
which the priest read was this : " Going forth, preach, saying : 
The kingdom of heaven is at hand. . . . Possess not gold nor 
silver nor money in your purses nor scrip for your journey, nor 
two coats nor shoes nor a staff; for the workman is worthy 
of his meat. And into whatsoever city or town you shall 
enter, inquire who in it is worthy, and there abide till you go 
hence. And when you come into a house, salute it, saying : 
Peace be to this house. . . . Behold I send you as sheep in 
the midst of wolves. Be ye therefore wise as serpents but 
simple as doves. . . . But when they shall deliver you up, take 
no thought how or what to speak : for it shall be given you 
in that hour what to speak." l 

Francis, as was his wont, listened intently as the Gospel 

1 Matt. x. 7-19. This is the Gospel for the feast of St. Mathias in the 
ancient missals ; whence the Bollandists conclude that it was on this feast 
that Francis received his final call (of. Acta SS., 4 October, Tom. II, p. 
574; Boehmer, Analekten, p. 124; P. Sabatier, V-ie de S. Francois, p. 78). 
Spader in Lumi Seraphici places the event on the feast of St. Luke, 12 Octo 
ber, 1208 ; and he is followed by Pere Gratien in Etudes Franciscaines, Tome 
XVIII, No. 106, Octobre, 1907, p. 388. 

Celano says the restoration of the Porziuncola took place in the third 
year of Francis conversion (of. I Celano, 21). So also say Bernard of Besse 
(Lib. de Laudibus, in Anal Franc, in. p. 687), and Giordano da Giano (Chron. 
Jordani in Anal. Franc, i. p. 2). 



HIS KNIGHTHOOD OF THE CKOSS 49 

was read, for this book had become verily to him the book of 
life. But to-day the words were like the sudden breaking of 
bonds : this was the Truth for which his soul had waited. 
And yet he was timorous lest perhaps he had not understood 
aright. So after mass he begged the priest to read the Gospel 
again to him and explain its meaning. This the priest did. 
Then Francis exclaimed, no longer hesitating : " This is what 
I have been seeking ; this is what my heart yearns for " ; and 
in a sweet certainty he at once set about fulfilling his Lord s 
command. In that quickly responsive way he always had, he 
immediately put off his shoes and laid aside his staff, and 
divested himself of his second garment ; and because he was 
eager to draw even more nigh to his crucified Master, he 
made himself a habit shaped like a cross and instead of a ^ 
leathern belt he girded himself with a rope. 1 To him it was OQ 
his solemn investiture as a knight of Christ. 

At^that moment all his early dream of knightly_adventure Ch* 
seemed well on the way to be satisfied, he being true and 
God s grace assisting. For certainly, he deemed, there could 
be no nobler knighthood than this, with Christ for his liege- 
lord and his ideal Poverty for the lady of his worship. Out 
in the wide world he would go seeking souls in need of suc 
cour ; and the powers of evil who raised enmities between God 
and man, and man and man, were the recreants against 
whom he must war ; and everywhere he would proclaim the 
reign of Christ and His peace. And in his love of Poverty 
he would find his strength and comfort to serve the Lord 
Christ well. 

So Francis takes up his life-burden. The golden sunlight 
of his youth s dream lies upon his path ; his heart is lifted 
up with a great love. The coming years will surely bring 
their meed of adventure and disillusion, of sorrow and joy ; 
but as he sets out upon his way sturdily and with a glad 
emotion, he thinks little of the mystery of the future : enough 
for him is the obedience of the day. 

1 1 Celano, 22 ; 3 Soc. 25 ; Leg, Maj. in. 1. 



CHAPTEK V. 
THE BEGINNING OF A NEW FRATERNITY. 

TAKING the path through the wood one day shortly after that 
notable reading of the Gospel, Francis came into the city. 
His whole being was alight with the divine inspiration which 
was urging him on. Meeting some citizens intent upon their 
daily rounds he stopped, and with great earnestness saluted 
them: "Brothers, the Lord give you His peace". Hardly 
at first did they recognize him in his strange garment, with 
the rope round his waist and his feet bare ; but there was a 
look in his face as of one gazing beyond the earth into the 
heavens, 1 which stopped their ready jest and compelled their 
reverence. They had now grown tolerant of his ways ; his 
evident sincerity and tenacity of purpose had begun to gain 
their respect. They might at times pass the laugh at him or 
meet him with a careless quip ; but few were able to resist 
his personal charm and the gentle good humour of his retorts. 
And then there was his industry in repairing the chapels and 
his devotion to the lepers. Those mediaeval folk were easily 
swayed either to derision or respect by what they saw of a 
man s work and by his bearing amongst them ; and they loved 
gallantry and fearlessness of any sort. But to-day there was 
something in Francis which quelled all inclination to jocularity 
as he poured forth a fervent plea for peace amongst men and 
love of the good God. 2 So often they had heard the same 
message delivered by some wandering devotee or by the Pope s 
legate when he had upbraided them for their feuds or by some 
preacher in the Duomo. And always this appeal for peace 

l "Totus alter videbatur quam fuerat ; et ccelum intuens dedignabatur 
respicere terram" (I Celano, 23). 
2 3 Soc. 25 ; Leg. Maj. in. 2. 

50 



THE BEGINNING OF A NEW FEATEENITY 51 

amongst Christian men had seemed so right and yet so im 
possible. How could any man maintain his standing amongst 
his fellows if he were a man of peace and kept apart from the 
quarrels of his family or class ? A man might as well turn 
monk at once. And yet as Francis pleaded with them they 
felt the sanctity of his words and a sense of guiltiness such as 
they had seldom felt before. They were not altogether con 
vinced ; but as the new evangelist left them and passed on, 
they stood silent and amazed, and going their ways, they, for 
a while at least, remembered his plea. After this first day of 
his mission he went frequently into the city on the same 
errand. He preached no set discourse; he merely stopped 
the citizens as he met them, with his greeting of peace and 
his soulful plea : and soon men began to expect him and wait 
upon his words. It was a new excitement, this appearance 
of the son of Pietro Bernardone in the role of evangelist ; 
and if the truth must be told, the Assisians were probably 
not a little gratified. Most cities counted a lay-preacher 
amongst their excitements and was he sure of a hearing; 
though after a time, when factions formed around him, he 
might preach at the risk of his life. But Francis was different 
from most of the lay-evangelists. He neither denounced the 
magistrates nor the clergy ; he did not pour out vials of wrath 
on the sinner s head, nor did he show any contempt for the 
weaknesses of men. He spoke as one looking intently upon 
a vision of beauty, and asserting its claim upon men s lives, 
and sorrowing for the blindness which made a man unseeing ; 
or as one who wishes to share with another the treasure he 
himself has found. And he was so manifestly happy in 
himself and in his message : and in this too he was unlike 
most other reformers. But with his change of garment he 
seemed to have put on that indefinable quality which marks 
a man for moral leadership, which belongs to men who not 
only possess a faith but are possessed by it and who besides 
have a certain imperative need to share their faith with 
others. They do not necessarily make a conscious effort 
to attract disciples : the quality of the faith which is in them 
does this often without any specific act of will on their part : 

4* 



52 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

they find themselves leaders rather than make themselves 
leaders. 

When the spring had run but half its course Francis was 
no longer a solitary : his retreat at the Porziuncola had already 
welcomed his first disciples, or as he would have said, his 
first brothers in the knightly order of Poverty. . They wfira 
Bernard da Quintavalle, Peter Cathanii and Giles 1 three 
valiant men, as their history afterwards proved. 

Bernard da Quintavalle was the first to seek out Francis and 
abide with him. 2 Like Francis, he was one of the merchant 
class, 3 and wealthy : but in character he was of a very different 
mould. His nature was serious and thoughtful and not 
easily won over to enthusiasms, but given to weighing the 
values of things. He was quick to discern the true from the 

Delano, 3 Soc. and Leg. Maj. mention Bernard by name but he is 
first styled Bernard da Quintavalle by Bernard of Besse in Liber de laudibus, ed. 
Hilarinus a Lucerna, p. 5. Cf. Chron. XXIV, Gen. in Anal. Franc, in. p. 667, 
Actus S. Franc. 1. 10-44. Peter is named in the 3 Soc. and is undoubtedly 
referred to in I Celano, 25 : Statim autem vir alter . . . qui valde in convcrsa- 
tione laudabilis exstitit et quod sancte coepit sanctius post modicum consum- 
mavit. It is disputed whether this Peter is the Peter Cathanii who became 
Vicar General and died in 1221. But from Celano s description and his 
reference to Peter s death it seems probable. Peter Cathanii, according 
to the Chron. Jordani (Anal. Franc, i. p. 4) was a doctor of law and highly 
respected by St. Francis. Barthol. of Pisa says he was a Canon of the Cathe 
dral (De Conformit. in Anal. Franc, iv. p. 472). The words : " Valde in con- 
versatione laudabilis " imply something more than uprightness of manners on 
the lips of Celano, who always shows much reverence for learning. If it is 
urged that Peter s death, supposing him to be the Peter who died in 1221, can 
hardly be said to have happened "post modicum" one must remember 
Celano s use of such terms : e.g. he speaks of the incident of the Stigmata 
as happening "shortly after" (paulo post) Francis heard the Voice from the 
crucifix at San Damiano (cf. II Celano, i, 11). 

2 So say the 3 Soc. 27, and the Leg. Maj. m. 3. But in I Celano, 24, 
mention is made of another, a nameless one, who, says Celano, was the 
first to join himself to Francis before the three mentioned in the text. Who 
was this nameless one ? And why do none of the other legends refer to him ? 
He left behind him a good name, for Celano describes him approvingly : pium 
ac simplicem spiritum gerens. Is Celano referring to the poor man whom 
Francis took to bless him against his father s curses ? or was he one who 
tarried awhile and then went away ? It is impossible to decide. 

3 Celano evidently implies this by his use of the phrase " ad mercandum 
regnwn coelorum " (I Celano, 24). Such conceits of language were dear to 
the chronicler. 



THE BEGINNING OF A NEW FEATEENITY 53 

plausible, but would withhold his judgment till he had proved 
his instinct : a cautious man but loyal ; generous but diffi 
dent. For some time past Bernard had been observant of 
Francis : he had narrowly watched his bearing and resolu 
tion; had admired the sincerity and courage of his life of 
poverty and his industry in repairing deserted chapels, until 
in spite of his caution he began to feel drawn to follow him. 
Being a religious man he wanted to save his soul, and already 
he felt the vanity of the world. Not wishing to commit him 
self in the eyes of the citizens, he visited Francis secretly 
and then offered him the hospitality of his house : and 
Francis, delighting in his company, went frequently to pass 
the night with him. 1 Partly out of reverence for his guest 
and partly the better to observe his ways, Bernard had a bed 
prepared for Francis in his own chamber. When the time 
came they would both retire to rest, but Bernard only feigned 
to sleep, being awake with his thoughts. And so he learned 
something of the secret of Francis life. For after a short 
sleep, Francis would quietly rise and give himself to prayer, 
often in his fervour unburdening his soul in murmured praises 
of God and the Blessed Virgin. And Bernard, listening, 
would say to himself: " Truly this man comes from God ". 

At length one evening Bernard said to Francis: "What 
should a man do for the best if having for many years held 
property of his lord, he now had no wish to retain it any 
longer? " Francis replied that he ought to return it to the 
lord. Then," said Bernard, "I wish for the love of God 
and my Lord Jesus Christ, to dispose of all my temporal 
goods which the Lord has conveyed to me, as it may 
seem best to thee." And Francis answered: " In the early 
morning we will go to the church and from the book of 
the Gospels we will get to know what the Lord taught His 
disciples to do ". 

Meanwhile Peter Cathanii, who had studied in the schools 
of Bologna and was a doctor of laws, had also felt the stirring 
of the spirit, and like Bernard had taken counsel of Francis, 

1 The house of Bernard da Quintavalle is still shown in the Via Sbaraglini 
near the Bishop s palace. 



54 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSISI 

and in some way placed himself under his guidance, as a 
scholar under his master. And Francis was glad that a man 
of the schools should thus be drawn to the simple ways of 
evangelical poverty, and he had a great reverence for one who 
was at once learned and God-fearing : he himself being but 
little versed in letters. 

So when, at daybreak, Francis and Bernard set out, they 
called for Peter, and together the three came to the church 
of St. Nicholas in the great square. 1 The book of the Gospels 
lay near the altar that all might read who cared. But neither 
Francis nor Bernard were scholars, and Peter, though he 
might be learned in law, had no aptness in the knowledge of 
Scripture : and they were all puzzled to know where in the 
book they might find the teaching suited to their need. So 
Francis knelt before the altar and prayed God to show them 
His Will in the opening of the book. Then he took the book 
and opened it and his eyes fell upon this passage from the 
Gospel of St. Matthew: " If thou wouldst be perfect, go, 
sell all that thou hast and give to the poor, and thou shalt 
have treasure in heaven ; and come follow Me ". A second 
time he opened the book and read this from St. Luke : 
" Take nothing for your journey, neither staff nor scrip nor 
bread nor money, neither have two coats". Then opening 
the book a third time, he came again upon St. Matthew s 
gospel at these words : "If any man will come after Me, let 
him deny himself and take up his cross and follow Me ". 2 
At this, Francis turned gleefully to his companions : 
" Brothers," he exclaimed, " this is our life and rule for our 
selves and for all who will join our company. Go, there 
fore, and fulfil the word you have heard." So the two 
neophytes went off, Bernard to sell all his substance, which 
was great, and Peter to dispose of his more modest property. 3 

1 It is now the caserna for the constabulary : but the altar-table, long 
since removed, is preserved in the Cathedral, being inserted into an altar in a 
side chapel to the right of the choir. 

2 Matt. xix. 21; Luke ix. 3; Matt. xvi. 24. 

3 3 Soc. 27-29; I Celano, 24-25; II Celano, 15; Leg. Maj. m. 3. 
Neither Celano nor St. Bonaventure associate Peter with Bernard in this in 
cident. I Celano says Peter came immediately after Bernard : Statim autem, 



THE BEGINNING OF A NEW FKATEENITY 55 

A few days later, it was the 16th day of April, there was 
a gathering of all the poor of Assisi in the Piazza San 
Giorgio : l and Bernard, who had sold his goods, was giving 
the money into their hands. Francis was assisting at the 
distribution and singing aloud his praises of God. Not a 
few of the citizens were there too, looking on at this strange 
deed and amazed at such recklessness. In the crowd that 
gathered was a priest, by name Sylvester, who at one time 
had given Francis stones for the rebuilding of the churches. 
He came forward now, seeing so much money going 
a-begging, and addressing Francis, exclaimed : " Brother, you 
did not pay me well for those stones ; give me now a share 
of this money ". " Thou shalt have thy due, sir priest," 
Francis replied smiling ; and taking two handfuls of coins 
from Bernard s cloak, he gave them to the priest, and then 
another two handfuls. "Art satisfied?" he asked: and Syl 
vester muttering that he was now well paid, went home. 2 

That day and for days afterwards there was much discus 
sion whenever men met in the city streets or in their homes 
about this wholesale casting away of one s property by so 
notable a citizen as the wealthy Bernard da Quintavalle. 3 

But Francis with Bernard and Peter had gone out to the 
retreat of the Porziuncola : 4 and Francis was happy because 
the Lord had given him true friends and companions. 

etc. The account given in 3 Soc. is, however, probably authentic; and it 
is to be noticed that whereas I Celano mentions only one opening of the book, 
II Celano mentions the three openings as in 3 Soc. Probably Bernard 
was the first to approach Francis with a view to joining him ; even 3 Soc. 
gives Bernard the first place amongst the three companions. 

1 Vita B. Fratris JEgidii [ed. Lemmens], 1, in Documenta Antigua, i. 
(Quaracchi), p. 38. It is now the Piazza Santa Chiara, since the church of 
Santa Chiara was built over and beside the church of San Giorgio. 

2 3 Soc. 30; II Celano, 109 ; Actus S. Franc, i. 38-40. 

3 Cf. Vita B. Fr. ^gidii, loc. cit. ; Cum audiret a quibusdam consanguineis 
ct ab aliis, etc. 

4 3 Soc. 32, says distinctly that Francis and his two companions went 
to the Porziuncola, where Celano tells us Francis had begun to dwell con 
stantly (of. I Celano, 21). Francis was also dwelling at the Porziuncola 
about the time that Morico of the Crutched Friars joined him. The phrase 
of St. Bonaventure in Leg. Maj. iv. 8; "cwm oleo accepto de lampade quca 
coram Virginia ardebat altari" I imagine refers to the altar in the chapel of 
the Porziuncola. 



56 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSIST 

Eight days later came Giles. He too was a native of 
Assisi but a man neither of birth nor wealth, being the son 
of a small farmer or husbandman. But what he lacked in 
worldly estate was made good to him in the refinement and 
nobility of his mind. He was much given to dwelling in his 
own thoughts, and was for ever peering into the soul-world : 
and he had a shrewd judgment and ready wit. In after years, 
when his fame had gone abroad, learned men flocked to him 
to gather some pithy word of wisdom, and the men of the 
schools grew careful how they challenged his satire and 
piercing common sense. Even the great Bonaventure re 
vered him as a master in the science of the soul. 1 

His coming to Francis was typical of the sagacious sim 
plicity of his character. When Bernard was distributing his 
wealth on the Piazza San Giorgio, Giles was very likely at 
his work in the fields, and it was only from his kinsfolk and 
acquaintances that he heard the gossip of the day. But the 
story kindled his imagination and desire, and he there and 
then determined to seek out Francis and ask to be taken into 
his company. On the feast of St. George he went to an early 
mass at the Martyrs church, thinking perhaps that Francis 
would be there ; and not finding him at the church he set 
out to seek him at the Porziuncola, where he was told Francis 
now dwelt. The chapel in the wood was unknown to him, 
and he knew not its location ; but he went out by the Via 
Francesca until he came to the cross-roads near the leper 
hospital of San Salvatore ; 2 but here he knew not which path 

1 Concerning Bro. Giles of. Fr. Paschal Eobinson, The Golden Sayings 
of Brother Giles; P. Gisbert Menge, Der Selige ^gidius von Assisi. His 
legend has been published by Lemmens in Doc. Antiqua Franciscana, Pars 
I ; and in Analecta Franc, torn. in. p. 74 seq. Cf. De Conformit in Anal. 
Franc, iv. pp. 205-13. An Italian version of the legend is found in most 
editions of the Fioretti. The Dicta B. JEgidii are published by the Bolland- 
ists : Acta SS. 23 Aprilis, p. 227 seq. ; and in Anal. Franc, iv. p. 214 scq. 

2 Where the Casa Gualdo now stands. M. Sabatier (Vie di S. Francois, 
p. 66) implies that Giles did not know where Francis dwelt, and from this 
draws the conclusion that Francis at this time had no fixed abode. But the 
Vita B. Fr. uSHgidii, loc. cit., says expressly that Giles " directed his steps to 
the Church of St. Mary of the Porziuncola . . . whichplace Brother Giles did 
not know ". Giles evidently had no doubt as to where St. Francis was to be 



THE BEGINNING OF A NEW FEATEKNITY 57 

to take. So he stopped and began to pray that God would 
show him the road. And whilst he was praying Francis 
came out of the wood near by. Then Giles, thanking God, 
ran forward and fell upon his knees, saying simply : " Brother 
Francis, I want to be with you for the love of God ". 

Quick to read souls, Francis recognized at once a true 
companion, and his heart went out to him in brotherly ten 
derness. "Knowest thou," asked Francis, " how great a 
favour the Lord has given thee ? If, my brother, the em 
peror came to Assisi and wished to choose one of the citizens 
to be his knight or chamberlain, many are they who would 
come forward to claim the honour. How much more highly 
then shouldst thou esteem it to be chosen by the Lord from 
out of so many, and to be called to His court." And bend 
ing over him, Francis lifted up the kneeling man and took him 
at once to the Porziuncola and introduced him to Brother 
Bernard. " See what a good brother the Lord has sent us," 
exclaimed Francis : and then they had their first meal to 
gether, eating and conversing merrily. 1 When they had 
eaten, Francis took Giles into the city to procure him a habit 
like to his own. The novice marched along in great content 
of soul ; but the awe and reverence of the day were upon him. 
They met a poor woman on the road who cried out for an alms. 
Francis having nothing he could give, passed on silently ; but 
still the woman pleaded. Giles was troubled, being wishful 
to give the woman something, yet waiting to receive the word 
from Francis. At the third pleading, Francis turned to him 
sweetly and said : " Let us give this poor woman thy cloak " : 
and Giles in great gladness took off his cloak and gave it, and in 
the giving felt so deep a comfort of spirit as no words could ex 
press. The same day Francis gave him the livery of Poverty : 
and that was Giles second great happiness in one day. 2 

found, only he did not know the way. The leper hospital of San Salvatore 
was served by the Crucigeri, an order of nursing brothers which was widely 
extended in Italy and in Latin possessions in the East. Cf. Registres de Ore- 
goire IX, Luc. Auvray, no. 209, p. 123. 

1 Vita B. Fr. JEgidii, loc. cit. pp. 39-40. 

2 Ibid., pp. 40-1 ; Aiwn. Perus in Acta SS. 4 October, Vol. II, p. 587 ; cf. 3 
Soc. 44. 



58 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSISI 

Exactly in what order the other disciples came in these 
first days it isimpossible_jL sagv* One there was7~PBiIip 
surnamed " the Long," whose eloquence in after years was 
such that it was said of him : " the Lord touched his lips 
with a cleansing fire, that he might speak of God in most 
sweet and honeyed words ; and although he had not studied 
the Holy Scriptures in the schools, yet did he so understand 
and interpret them, that he became a true disciple of those 
who, being simple and unlettered, were yet destined to be the 
princes of the Jews ". 2 Another was that Sylvester the priest 
whom we have met at the distribution of Bernard s wealth. 

The part he took on that occasion might hardly mark 
him out for a future companion in the Court of Poverty. 
But at heart Sylvester was not ungenerous ; and his life was 
blameless. He was of those who approved of Francis zeal 
in repairing the churches ; but at first he much doubted the 
wisdom of his consorting with beggars and his total disregard 
of the conventions of ordinary society : to him it seemed a 
tempting of Providence or a young man s wilfulness ; 3 and 
perhaps too he did not approve of lay-evangelists : often in 
deed they became fire-brands and heretics. So when he saw 
the money a-going in foolish recklessness he saw no reason 
why he should not have his own in payment for the stones 
he had formerly given. And yet being a man of some spirit- 

1 It is difficult to reconcile the order of the first companions given in the 
legends. The 3 Soc. gives the first six as Bernard, Peter, Giles, Sabbatino, 
Morico, and John de Capella. 

So also in Anon. Perus., Acta SS. loc. cit. p. 584. Celauo puts Bernard, 
Peter, and Giles, respectively second, third, and fourth. He then speaks of 
Philip as making the brethren seven in number : but whether he includes St. 
Francis in the seven is not clear, though at first sight he seems to do so. St. 
Bonaventure, after speaking of Bernard, says that five other men were called, 
and thus " the number of six sons of Francis was complete ". Is he following 
Celano or the 3 Soc., or giving an independent account ? 

Bartholomew of Pisa in De Conformit. (Anal. Franc, iv. p. 177) gives 
the order thus: Bernard da Quintavalle, Peter Cathanii, Giles, Sabbatino, 
Morico, John de Gapella, Philip the Long, John da S. Costanzo, Barbaro, 
Bernard de Viridante, Angelo Tancredi, Sylvester. 

2 1 Gelano, 25; Actus S. Franc, i. 6. Concerning Philip the Long, cf. 
Chron. Jordani in Anal. Franc, i. p. 5. 

3 Leg. Maj. in. 5. 



THE BEGINNING OF A NEW FKATERNITY 59 

uality, in spite of himself, he grew ashamed when Francis 
so freely poured the money into his hands ; and when he 
went home his soul was troubled ; nor could he banish the 
sense that this reckless generosity was more akin to the 
spirit of Christ than was his own prudence in which he began 
to detect a latent love of money such as he himself perhaps 
had frequently upbraided in the lives of others. Then one 
night he had a dream. It seemed to him that a huge dragon 
was surrounding the city and threatening it with destruc 
tion ; but whilst he was trembling for the result, Francis 
appeared, and from his mouth there came a golden cross 
which reached to the heavens and extended on each side to 
the limits of the earth : and the dragon seeing this, was afraid 
and fled away. Three nights that same dream came to him 
and Sylvester could no longer hesitate to take it as a warning 
from God. He sought out Francis and related his dream, 
and not long afterwards he joined the company. 1 He became 
a lover of solitude, giving himself much to contemplation 
and prayer. 

Of the remaining first neophytes, one, Morico by name, 
came from the leper hospital of San Salvatore. He was of the 
nursing brotherhood of the Crucigeri : whom Francis had 
tended in a sickness. 2 Another was from Eieti : his name 
was Angelo Tancredi and he was a most courteous and gentle 
knight in the world before he became a knight of Poverty. 3 
Then there was Barbaro, who some years afterwards went 
with Francis on a missionary journey to the East ; 4 and yet 
another whose name became a warning to the brethren, for 
he turned recreant in the end and came by a bad end : he 
was John de Capella, a man who loved novelties and his 
own will. 5 

1 Leg. Maj. in. 5 ; 3 Soc. 31 ; II Celano, 109 ; Actus S. Franc, i. 41-43. 

2 3 Soc. 35 ; Leg. Maj. iv. 8. Cf. De Conformit. in Anal. Franc, iv. p. 59, 
et passim. 

3 Cf. Speculum Perfcctionis [ed. Sabatier], cap. 85, p. 167. 

4 De Conformit. in Anal. Franc, iv. p. 177. Cf . II Celano, 155 ; Spec. 
Perfect, cap. 51. 

5 3 Soc. 35. Cf. Actus S. Franc, i. 3; xxxv. 10. De Conformit. in 
Anal. Franc, iv. pp. 494, 178, 440, 193. Some authors think him the same 
as John de Compello, mentioned in Chron. Jordani, Anal. Franc, i. p. 5. 



60 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSISI 

Thus, within a few months from the day he changed his 
habit, did Francis find himself the leader of a small group of 
disciples. They had come to him without his seeking, drawn 
by a kinship of spirit. But as each came it was to him a 
new joy ; for he saw in their coming the beginning of a world 
regained to the Lord Christ and the Lady Poverty. 



CHAPTEE VI. 
FIRST MISSIONARY JOURNEYS. 

EVENTS had moved rapidly since that day of St. Mathias, and 
still more rapidly since the morning when Bernard had dis 
tributed his goods to the poor in the Piazza San Giorgio : just 
as after the pause in the springtime the hedges suddenly ex 
pand in a tumult of bloom. From a recluse, Francis had 
been transformed into an apostle : he was now the leader of a 
knightly company of holy poverty. The zeal of an apostle 
was upon him, urging him to carry his good news abroad and 
win souls to his Lord s allegiance. Hardly had Bernard, 
Peter, and Giles put on their vesture of poverty than Francis 
must lead them out to fulfil their mission. Himself and 
Giles took a road which led across the mountains into the 
March of Ancona : the destination of the other two is not 
recorded. As Francis went along he sang in a loud voice in 
the Proven9al tongue, of the goodness of God Most High : so 
gleeful and joyous he was in his love of poverty. Already he 
beheld this company of the Lady Poverty, like a goodly order 
of knighthood, being filled with generous souls and traversing 
the world with its message of penance and love and peace. 
" This order of ours," he said to Giles, " is like unto a fisher 
man who casts his net into the water and takes in an abun 
dant draught of fish; and he casts back the small fish into 
the water and chooses the large ones for his baskets." And 
Giles knew what he would signify : that only the generous 
and large-hearted were fitted for this new life. They did not 
preach any formal discourse, but as they passed through the 
walled villages and cities they stopped when they met the 
people, and Francis exhorted them in homely simple words 
to fear and love God and do penance for their sins : and Giles 

61 



62 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

standing aside would quickly urge the people to listen to 
Francis words, for that he was a man who spoke well. Often 
enough the villagers and townsmen were in no mood to 
listen : they had no wish to be preached at, and grew im 
patient of these strangers. Some looked upon them as poor 
fools ; others, as fanatics. Others again shook their heads and 
were frankly at a loss how to take them, like him who was 
heard to remark: "either they are saints or they are stark mad". 
Their unusual dress and unkempt appearance frightened 
some : young women seeing them approach, would run quickly 
away, thinking them wizards or men with an evil eye, who 
would cast a spell upon them. Altogether the journey seemed 
fruitless of any good result ; but Francis was never one to 
bargain for results : he went as his faith urged him leaving 
results to follow in God s own time. A loyal knight must 
follow the quest, not reckoning the consequences of his toil 
so much as the duty to undertake it. Thus Francis and 
Giles toured the March of Ancona and then returned to the 
Porziuncola. 1 It was then that Sabbatino, Morico, and John 
de Capella, all men of Assisi, joined the company. Their 
coming was made remarkable by an upheaval of feeling on 
the part of the citizens against Francis and his brethren. At 
first the novelty of a reputable citizen like Bernard da Quin- 
tavalle, distributing all his wealth to the poor, had been an 
excitement not to be quickly laughed down. After all if two 
or three men care to act in the teeth of common sense and 
play the saint, what did it matter ? It was but an interlude 
in the serious business of life. Their relatives naturally would 
resent such doings, but one or two families do not make the 
city. And then in some vague indefinite way that wholesale 
renouncement of Bernard had touched the conscience of the 
people. The appeal to the Gospel, so dramatically enacted 

1 3 Soc. 33. No other legend mentions this journey into the March 
of Ancona ; but there is no reason to doubt its authenticity. True, Celano 
(I Celano, 28) relates the similitude of the fisherman in connexion with later 
incidents ; but it is evident that Celano in this place is not following a chrono 
logical order, but is simply summing up the events which happened in the 
days before the approbation of the Rule, with a view to set forth St. Francis 
spirit of prophecy. 



FIBST MISSIONAKY JOUKNEYS 63 

under their very eyes, for the moment silenced the prudence 
of the world and inclined the Assisians to worship. Love of 
an excitement, reverence and cynicism all went to make the 
city tolerant. But when, as the days went on, the movement 
lost its first novelty and stage-illusion and the citizens began 
to feel its presence in their daily life, as a thing asserting 
itself in their very homes and making a demand not only on 
their emotion but also on their conscience, a reaction took 
place. Here were men putting new ideas into the minds of 
one s acquaintances and relatives, at variance with the ac 
cepted order of things ; which ideas were making themselves 
subtly felt at inconvenient moments, keeping one man away 
from the riotous feast, detaching another from a family feud, 
and everywhere creating an element of hesitation and doubt 
in society. And soon it began to be said in the city that it 
was all very well for men to give their own property to the 
poor, but it was monstrous to expect the citizens afterwards 
to support them. The clamour broke loose when Sabbatino 
and the other two went to swell the number of these new mendi 
cants. The citizens now stoutly refused to give them any 
thing. Francis entering the city to beg, was received with 
insults and sarcasm. Had he been less sure of his mission 
this moment might have been fraught with irreparable 
mischief. The malcontent citizens had a show of reason in 
their clamour. He was taking men from their families and 
civic duties and casting them penniless and homeless upon 
the world; wasting the family inheritance and making his 
associates a burden to the people from whose midst they had 
gone out. To the man in the street it was surely idealism 
run mad. At this juncture even those who had hitherto stood 
by Francis, began to doubt and counsel compromise. He was 
letting loose a flood he might not be able to direct. It was 
time to pause and consider whither things were moving. 

The bishop sent for Francis, and counselled him to 
reconsider his way of life. It seemed hardly prudent, the 
bishop urged, to gather men together without any provision 
for their bodily needs. To practise poverty was all quite 
right : but the monks did that and yet had means to live 



64 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSISI 

upon. What if the people refused to support him by their 
alms? Must they die of starvation? And how could a 
number of men live without a house of their own ? 

It was a difficult moment for Francis. Bishop Guido had 
been his friend and counsellor from the beginning and had 
shielded him in time of distress : and in his heart Francis 
was deeply grateful. Yet not for an instant did he hesitate. 
"My lord," he replied, "if we keep property we shall need 
arms to defend ourselves and we shall be continually involved 
in litigation and feuds ; and this will oftentimes prevent us 
from loving God and our neighbour : therefore do we desire 
to possess no temporal goods in this world." The reply 
struck home ; for none knew better than Bishop Guido how 
the temporalities of churches and abbeys were a constant and 
increasing cause of trouble between the clergy and the people, 
and between the clergy themselves. His own episcopate was 
marred by frequent and acrimonious quarrels over property 
with the commune and the religious houses in his diocese. 1 
So he refrained from urging his counsel, convinced perhaps in 
his heart that God was here working in new ways, the re 
vealing of which must be left to time. Francis therefore re 
turned to his waiting brethren, with his liberty intact and 
with the bishop s blessing if not with his unreserved ap 
proval. 2 

During the next few months the brethren fashioned 
themselves in the spirit and exercises of their vocation 
without any notable incident breaking the even tenor of 
their lives. It can hardly be said that they had a home in 
the ordinary sense of the word ; but the Porziuncola was 
their retreat and meeting-place and there they had a small 
temporary shelter which Francis had built in the first days 
when Bernard and Peter and Giles came to him. 3 

Their days were spent in the service of others. If they 
were not on a journey bearing witness to the Gospel, they 

1 Of. Horoy, Honorii III opera, torn i. col. 163, 200. 
2 1 Celano, 28. 

3 3 Soc. 32: " Et fecerunt ibi unam domunculam in qua aliquando 
pariter morarentur ". 



FIRST MISSIONARY JOURNEYS 65 

were tending the lepers in the hospitals or assisting the 
farmers in the fields or doing other menial service in return 
for their food. 1 Before the day s toil began there was the labour 
of the night : the service of the spirit alone in its communion 
with God. For after a few hours sleep, whilst yet the world 
slept on, they rose and gave themselves to prayer, the inti 
mate prayer of the heart. At these times they drew as nigh 
as they could to the eternal mysteries, searching out their 
own moral weaknesses and strengthening themselves in the 
hope and comfort which was given them, They were but 
mortal men and none knew it better than themselves. They 
had launched out into the deep at the word of the Master 
and bravely they were holding on their course, but often it 
was with a fear at their heart lest they should fail. 

The more the nobility of their calling came home to their 
understanding, the more acutely they felt their several weak 
nesses. There was Brother Bernard who was constantly 
trembling for fear of his own constancy ; 2 Brother Peter was 
liable to hesitations of worldly prudence ; 3 nor was Giles, 
the mystic, immune from the attractions of the earth. 4 
Bach had his own particular care and moral danger-point 
against which they must strengthen their souls. But when 
they were with men, even their own brethren, they seldom let 
any sign of their soul s straggle appear, at least not in any 
mark of sadness or weariness. Such knowledge as they 
had of each other s struggle came to them by their mutual 
sympathy and fraternal understanding or in the personal aloof 
ness with which men seek counsel concerning their innermost 
need. But the gladness and peace which they possesed abun 
dantly, notwithstanding their several temptations, they shared 
freely. They were bound to each other not only by their 
common faith in Poverty but by a strong mutual affection, 
such as comes to men who are wholly and simply given to 

1 Concerning the primitive life of the friars, cf . I Celano, 39-41 seq. ; 
3 Soc. 36-44; Spec. Perfect, cap. 55; Vita B. Fr. JEgidii, pp. 41-3; De 
Conformit. in Anal. Franc, iv. 207-20. 

2 Cf. II Celano, 48. 3 Ibid., 67. 

4 Cf . De Conformit. in Anal. Franc, iv. p. 209 et passim. 

5 



66 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

a common faith and who have no interest which can separate 
them from each other. Great was their joy when after being 
parted from each other by reason of some journey, they 
came together again. At such times, says one who knew 
them, " they were filled with such gladness and rejoicing 
at again beholding each other, that they remembered nought 
of what they had suffered from evil men". 1 Perhaps the 
opposition they met with in the world, made them the more 
appreciative of each other s welcome. 

Amongst them all Francis was as the angel of the house, 
ever watchful to assist and encourage each in his peculiar 
need as well as to direct the common purpose. He was 
gifted with a noble watchfulness for those who depended 
upon him, 2 and the brethren confided in him with unhesi 
tating simplicity, revealing to him their inmost thoughts and 
temptations : but oftentimes they had no need to speak, so 
well he read their souls. 

And as it was when they were at home with Francis in 
their retreat at the Porziuncola, so too was it when they were 
sent on a journey into a neighbouring district to bear witness 
to the Gospel they had received. Wherever they went they 
had a care for the lepers they met on the way ; they shared 
the labour of the poor ; sought shelter at night in outhouses or 
in the servants quarters or in the porches of houses or 
churches ; 3 begged their bread from door to door when they 
did not receive it in return for their work ; exhorted men to 
good living and God-loving ways : but they would seek out 
solitary places for their hours of prayer. One thing the 
brethren on these journeys would often miss, the joy and 
encouragement of Francis presence. Not infrequently they 
were taken for fools or knaves and treated accordingly. At 
such times they called to mind the teaching of Francis, and re 
flecting on the sufferings of Jesus Christ, nerved themselves 
to patient meekness. And this came the more readily to 

*3 Soc. 41. 

2 "Felici semper curiositate in subditis ferebatur " is the inimitable phrase 
of Celano (I Celano, 51). 

3 3 Soc. 38; Anon. Perils, loc. cit. p. 584. 



FIEST MISSIONAKY JOUENEYS 67 

them, because under the inspiration of Francis their daily 
life had become to them very vividly a walking in the com 
pany of their Divine Master. The Gospel story was to them 
not a far-off history but an ever-present event, a world-life 
in which they themselves were partakers. Its actuality 
lay all around them : by faith they saw the whole earth 
gathered about the Person of the Christ. When people 
treated them kindly they instinctively passed on the kindness 
to Him who was their Life ; when they suffered unkindness, 
they took it as He would take it. They looked upon the 
world in the light of His purity and loving compassion ; they 
were conscious of His Love for all living things as His own 
proper domain ; and sin grieved them because of the injury it 
was to Him. And since they were His servants and heralds, 
their thought was to share His burden of the world s re 
demption. In this preoccupation of mind and heart they 
came to lose the manners and habits of the world they had 
left, and their speech and action as well as their thought 
and desire became of a piece with their soul s purpose. 
Francis strove hard that it should be so with them, for he 
knew that only so could they find the joy of the life they had 
chosen. 

Thus the summer days had passed and the restful autumn 
time, in practises of prayer, self-discipline, and active service 
for their fellow-men, and it was now winter, 1 when Francis, 
impelled by the spirit, called the brethren together and pro 
posed a long quest into distant parts. Another companion 
had meanwhile joined them and they were therefore eight in 
number. 

The brethren were gathered together, probably in the 
chapel of the Porziuncola, ready to take their departure, 
when Francis addressed them, a peculiar tenderness in his 
voice as of a father looking upon his sons going forth to seek 
their fortunes and that of their house, in the world. It was 

1 The period of the year for the incidents which follow in the text, is de 
termined by the stories told of the journey of Brothers Bernard and Giles in 
3 Soc. 39-40 (cf. " licet essct magnus frigus," etc.) and in Vita B. Fr. ^gidii, 
loc. cit. p. 41 : "in quo itinere . . . frigus et tribulationem perpessus est". 

5* 



68 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

to be the widest journey they had yet undertaken. In that 
quick burning way of his, he spoke to them of the Kingdom 
of God of which, as sons of Poverty, they had become heirs. 
He besought them never to let their heart s desire get en 
slaved to the transitory things of the present, but to keep 
their mind s eye fixed upon the things eternal. Then he 
reminded them that they were called unto this manner of 
life not for their own sakes alone but for the saving of the 
world ; wherefore it behoved them to go forth, admonishing 
men by word and example to do penance for their sins and 
observe the commandments of God. They were to be gentle 
and patient, putting their trust in their heavenly Father, and 
not to be afraid because they were simple and lowly and de 
spised by men ; for the Spirit of God would speak in them. 
" You will find some," he went on to say, " who will be 
believing, gentle and gracious, who will receive you and your 
words with joy ; but others, and these the greater part, will 
be unbelieving, proud and blasphemous ; they will revile and 
resist you : and against these you shall speak. 1 Set it there 
fore in your hearts to bear all things patiently and humbly. 
Go forth, therefore, my most beloved, two and two unto all 
parts of the earth, announcing peace and inviting to penance 
and the remission of sins. To those who question you, make 
answer humbly ; bless those who persecute you ; give thanks 
to those who injure and calumniate you, for because of these 
things an eternal kingdom is prepared for you." When he 
had finished speaking, the brethren came one by one and 
knelt before him asking his blessing, and as he gave his 
blessing to each in turn, he bent down and lifted the brother 
up and embraced him, saying: "Cast thy burden upon the 
Lord and He will sustain thee". 2 

At that the little company parted, going two and two to 
north and south and east and west. Francis and his com 
panion went south to the valley of Kieti, 3 where in winter the 
snows lie thickly on the mountain tops : and of what befell 

l i.e. their admonitions will be to these a judgment and warning. 

2 3 Soc. 36 ; I Celano, 29 ; Leg. Maj. in. 7. 

3 Wadding, Annaks, ad an. 1209. 



FIKST MISSIONAKY JOUENEYS 69 

them there, we shall shortly hear. Brothers Bernard and 
Giles were destined for Spain, where they purposed to visit 
the shrine of the apostle St. James at Compostella. 1 Of the 
destination of the others there is no record. 

Of this journey of the brethren we are told : " When the 
brethren came upon a church or a cross, they bowed in prayer 
and said devoutly : * We adore Thee, Christ, and we bless 
Thee in all Thy churches that are in all the world, for that 
by Thy holy cross Thou hast redeemed the world ; 2 for they 
believed they had come upon a dwelling place of the Lord 3 
wherever they found be it only a cross. All who saw them 
marvelled exceedingly, for that in habit and manner of life 
they were unlike all others and seemed like men from the 
hills. Into whatsoever place they entered, were it a city or 
walled town or a farm or a house, they brought the message 
of peace, encouraging all to fear and love the Creator of 
heaven and earth and keep His commandments. Some 
heard them gladly; others, contrariwise, mocked them, and 
by many they were asked whence they came and of what 
Order they were. And although it was toilsome to answer 
so many questions, they nevertheless in simplicity acknow 
ledged that they were penitents, natives of the city of Assisi : 
for as yet their Order was not confirmed as a religion. 4 
Many thought them deceivers or fools, nor would they receive 
them into their houses lest being thieves they might by 
stealth carry off their goods. Wherefore in many places, after 
injuries had been done them, they would shelter in the porches 
of churches or houses." 5 

1 1 Celano, 30 ; Vita B. Fr. Mgidii, loc. cit. 

2 Celano says they said this prayer together with the Pater Nosier, since 
they were as yet ignorant of the Divine Office (I Celano, 45). The Fribourg 
codex of the Liber de Laudibus says the brethren recited three Paters for 
each hour of the office, and it adds that Francis made this rule in order not to 
impede private and mental prayer. Cf. Bern, a Bessa, Lib. de Laudibiis, ed. 
Hilarinus a Lucerna, p. 9, n. 1 ; Wadding, Annales, ad an. 1210. 

3 So I translate " locum Domini," in accordance with mediaeval monastic 
language. 

4 " Beligio " in mediaeval language signifies a form of religious life ap 
proved by the Church. 
5 3 Soc. 37-8. 



70 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSISI 

This description of the reception of the brethren on their 
journeys finds its echo in the records of many journeys to 
come, as we shall have occasion to note in the course of this 
history. The friars did not at once become the heroes of the 
people amongst whom they appeared. The chronicler just 
quoted then goes on to tell of what befell Brothers Bernard 
and Giles in the city of Florence, to which city they had 
come on their way to Spain. " About this time two of these 
[brethren] were at Florence, and they went through the city 
begging for a lodging, yet could find none. Now coming 
to a certain house which had an oven in the porch they said 
one to the other: Here we might take shelter . They 
therefore besought the mistress of the house to receive them 
within the house, and when she refused they said humbly that 
at least she might permit them to rest that night near the 
oven. This she granted ; but when her husband came and 
found them in the porch, he called his wife and said to her : 
Wherefore hast thou granted these ribalds shelter in our 
porch ? she replied that she had been unwilling to receive 
them into the house but had allowed them to lie outside the 
porch where they could steal nothing but the firewood. The 
husband therefore would not allow that any shelter should be 
given them, although the cold was very great, since he took 
them to be ribalds and thieves. So all that night until the 
morning they lay near the oven, sleeping lightly enough ; 
warmed only by heat divine and covered only by the shelter 
of Lady Poverty : and then they went to the nearest church 
to hear the morning office. 

"When day had come, the woman went to the same 
church, and seeing there those brethren devoutly continuing 
in prayer, she said within herself : * Were these men ribalds 
and thieves as my husband said, they would not thus con 
tinue reverently in prayer . And whilst she was pondering 
thus, behold a man named Guido was bestowing alms upon 
the poor who were waiting in that church, and when he 
came to the brethren and would give them both money, as he 
gave the others, they refused the money and would not take 
it. But he said to them : Wherefore do you, being poor, not 



FIEST MISSIONAEY JOUENEYS 71 

take money as do the others ? Brother Bernard replied : 
It is true that we are poor ; but poverty is not a hard thing 
to us as it is to these other poor ; for by God s grace, Whose 
counsel we have fulfilled, we have made ourselves poor of 
our own accord . At this the man marvelled, and asking 
them if they had ever possessed anything, he learned from 
them that they had had much property but for the love of 
God had given all to the poor . . . Wherefore the said woman, 
pondering how that the brethren would not take the money, 
went to them and said that she would gladly receive them into 
her house, if they would come thither for the sake of being her 
guests. To whom they humbly answered : The Lord repay 
thee for thy goodwill . But the aforesaid man, hearing that 
the brethren had not been able to find a lodging, brought them 
into his house, saying : Behold here a lodging made ready 
for you by the Lord ; abide therein according to your good 
pleasure ; and they giving thanks to the Lord, remained with 
him some days, edifying him both by example and by word 
in the fear of the Lord, so that afterwards he bestowed much 
of his wealth upon the poor." l Of Brother Giles this also is 
told, that meeting a poor man on the way he was struck with 
pity at his scanty clothing, and having only one tunic of his 
own, he gave the man his hood, and himself went hoodless 
for twenty days, suffering much from the cold. 2 

Francis, as we have said, went to the mountain valley of 
Eieti, which lies to the south beyond the valley of Spoleto : 3 
and here there came to him a wonderful grace. Ever since 
his conversion from the world there had been a mist in his 
joy whenever he thought of the neglected years which had 
gone before ; and this sorrow had become more and more 
poignant as the days went on. Indeed during these past few 

1 3 Soc. 39-40. I have omitted, as not needful to this narrative, a pas 
sage in which occurs these words descriptive of Brother Bernard : " qui 
primopacis et pcenitcntia legationem amplectens, post sanctum Dei cucurrit". 
Readers of Dante will recognize the source of the verses in the Divina 
Commedia, canto xi. lines 79-81. Cf. Anon. Perus. in Ada SS. loc. cit. p. 
585. 

2 Vita B. Fr. JEgicUi, loc. cit. p. 41. 

3 Wadding, Annales, ad an. 1209. 



72 LIFE OF ST. FRANCIS OF ASSIST 

months Francis had been experiencing to the uttermost that 
self-humiliation which comes with the first consciousness of 
a high spiritual destiny. In his large unselfishness he could 
not but rejoice as the work of the Lord unfolded itself in the 
coming of his companions. At times he would sing aloud 
the praises of God in sheer gratitude and exultancy of spirit 
at the thought of the grace which was given them. Then, 
becoming conscious of himself, he would shrink back, amazed 
and fearful, oppressed with the sense of his own deficiency, 
and his eyes and heart would weep for the years when he 
might have been fitting himself for the task which God had 
laid upon him. And then there would come upon him the 
awful dread lest the misspent past should take its revenge 
and be his undoing in the end. 

In such tempest of self-abasement he found himself one 
day as he was praying in a solitude above the town of 
Poggio-Bustone, on the borders of the Abruzzi ; whither he 
had come in his tour of the country of Rieti. It is a spot 
of the earth which induces one to deep ponderings, and there 
is a certain melancholy in its high mountainous seclusion and 
the dark enclosure of the neighbouring hills. 1 

In very misery Francis had cast himself upon the Divine 
mercy, repeating time after time in a broken spirit : " God 
be merciful to me, a sinner " ; for he yet had hope that the 
all-pitying Redeemer would show mercy and not let His work 
be frustrated by His servant s unworthiness. But the cup 
of his humiliation that day was deep and he must drink it to 
the dregs. Then suddenly there came to him a complete 
and indubitable assurance that all his past sins were forgiven 
him, and that by God s grace he would not fail at the last ; 
and at that same time he saw as in a vision the company of 
Poverty growing into a large host and subduing the earth ; 
and he knew his quest and leadership would not be fruitless. 
At that his whole being was changed and he came from 
his prayer another man; as one who had looked upon the 
face of God and found his peace there. 

1 The grotto in which Francis prayed is a steep climb above the town : it is 
still a place of pilgrimage. Every Easter Monday the peasantry from all the 
neighbouring villages march in procession to the grotto and hear mass there. 



FIEST MISSIONAKY JOUKNEYS 73 

Then was his first thought to share his joy with his 
brethren ; for he knew how they too were tried by temptation 
and how this vision of his, of the increase of their company, 
would be to them an encouragement. Thereupon he be 
sought God to turn them all back from their journeys and 
bring them together at the Porziuncola. And it happened 
that at that same time all the brethren felt a drawing home 
wards and returned ; nor did any of them know why they 
had at that particular time begun their homeward journey, 
until Francis told them of his longing for them to return and 
of his prayer. 

So they were once more gathered together when Francis 
unburdened his mind of his vision, uttering his words as one 
who has found a great joy. "My most beloved," he said, 
"be comforted and rejoice in the Lord, and be not sad 
because you seem to be few. Neither let my simple ways, nor 
yours, affright you : for the Lord has shown me that He will 
make us to increase into a great multitude and spread abroad 
even to the ends of the earth. And that you may be en 
couraged to advance on your way, I am compelled to tell you 
what I have seen. Kather would I be silent, but my love 
compels me to speak. I have seen a great multitude of men 
coining to us, desiring to put on the habit of our holy voca 
tion and to live under the rule of our blessed religion, and 
their sound is in my ears as they come and go under the 
orders of holy obedience. I have seen the roads from all the 
nations full of men coming into these parts : the French are 
coming, the Spaniards are hastening, the Germans and Eng 
lish run, and great is the crowd of them who hurry along 
speaking other tongues." Then was there great joy in that 
small company, for all had caught the enthusiasm of their 
leader and his daring ambition to establish the reign of the 
crucified Eedeemer. 1 There was in their ambition no thought 

l l Gelano, 26-7. Celano relates the incident of St. Francis s assurance 
of forgiveness and the subsequent address to the brethren, before mentioning 
the missionary journey of the eight; but, as we have remarked before, he 
observes a chronological order in his legend, only in a very general sense. 

Wadding (Annales, ad an. 1209) accepts the tradition that the assurance 
of forgiveness came to Francis at Poggio Bustone. Celano moreover relates 



74 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

of self. They loved the Lord Christ and hungered to see 
Him in His poverty and humility, the Lord of the earth ; and 
they loved their fellowmen and yearned that all should share 
the joy they themselves had found. 

But Francis, with all his enthusiasm, was already seeing 
things with the searching eye of a leader. Much as he 
rejoiced with the brethren over this coming multitude, yet he 
did not fail to see that with the crowd would come travail 
of spirit and a time of trial. Where there is a multitude it 
cannot be as with a small family united in heart and ruled by 
one single purpose. "My beloved," he said to his compan 
ions, " in these first days of our dwelling together, it is like 
eating apples all sweet and pleasant to the taste ; a little later 
the apples offered to us will not all be so sweet and pleasant, 
and in the end some will be of such bitterness that we shall 
be unable to eat them, though outwardly they will look fair 
and juicy enough " : l which words were to prove a true 
prophecy. 

But at present neither Francis nor the brethren were 
disturbed at any prevision of future troubles. They were 
yet living in the first absorbing wonderment of their new 
vocation. 

And a blessed thing too is that first wonderment which 
whilst it lasts is like the vital contentment of a perfect 
summer s day, transfusing one s dream with a palpitating 
light ; or like the satisfying infinitude of the western sky at 
sundown when the clouds have widely parted. Such wonder 
ment is the bridal gift of a true love, whether it be the love 
of man and maid or the mystic love of the soul and its voca 
tion. Out of that wonderment comes the joy and strength 
of life, whether in the first blithe marches of achievement or 
in the inevitable stages of hardship and disillusions through 
which the perfect faith must pass to its triumphant realiza 
tion. Yet though his heart was not saddened nor his faith 

that the sudden recall of the brethren was due to a vision which Francis 
had : " Convenientibus vero in unum, de visione pii pastoris magna gaudia 
celebrant" etc., and later: " Beatus pater coepit eis suum aperire propositum, 
etc. (I Celano, 30, 31). 
1 1 Celano, 28. 



FIKST MISSIONAEY JOUKNEYS 75 

daunted, Francis felt the need of establishing his company in 
a greater security against the dangers to come. 

This brotherhood of Poverty was to spread over the earth ; 
it would need some definite pledge of world-wide authority 
and a definite visible allegiance symbolical of its allegiance 
to the world s Saviour. Instinctively Francis turned to the 
Pope, the Vicar of Christ on earth : he should receive in 
Christ s name, the allegiance of the brotherhood and give it its 
charter and be its earthly lord and its protector against the 
evil of the world. 

Now it frequently happens that the incidents which im 
mediately determine events fraught with great consequences, 
are in themselves trivial : they take their importance from the 
accumulating expectancy of a movement to which they be 
come a sign. So Francis s decision to seek the Papal sanction 
and protection for the brotherhood was quickened by the 
coming of four new postulants. With these the company of 
Poverty numbered twelve brethren : it was the number of 
the Apostles. Now, thought Francis, they lacked but one 
thing to make them like unto the first apostolic college ; that 
one thing being the manifest commission of Christ, which 
could be given them only by Christ s Vicar. So Francis and 
the brethren sought direction in prayer and then determined 
forthwith to set out for Rome and seek the presence of the 
Pope. 

The four new brethren were John of San Constanzo, 
Barbaro, Bernard de Vigilanzio l and the noble knight, 
Angelo Tancredi who had followed Francis from the Valley 
of Kieti. 2 

1 He is variously designated as Bernard de Vigilanzio, Bernard Vigilanzo 
de Vida, and Bernard de Viridante. 

2 Wadding (Annales, ad an. 1210) tells a story of the coming of Angelo 
Tancredi which is quite in accord with the character of Francis. Meeting 
Angelo in the valley of Bieti, Francis accosted him saying : " It is a long 
time enough that you have carried the belt and sword and spurs of the world. 
Come with me and I will dub you a knight of the army of Christ." But the 
source of this story is the Actus S. Franc, in Valle Reatina, a fourteenth 
century compilation of doubtful authority. It has recently been edited by 
Prof. Pennacchi in Miscellania Francescana, Vol. XIII, pp. 6-21. 



CHAPTEK VII 
POPE INNOCENT APPROVES THE RULE OF THE ORDER. 

THE days were filled with the temperate heat and sunshine 
of early spring, and the shortening of the nights was gracious 
to the scantily clad brethren hastening to Kome. Francis was 
full of expectancy. In his hands he carried with him the 
Rule of life which he had written and which was to be the 
charter of his alliance with the Lady Poverty, and he was 
confident that the Pope would confirm it : for was not 
Poverty the bride of Christ in His life on earth, and how then 
could the Vicar of Christ repel her ? One night he had a 
dream and it seemed to him that he was walking along a 
road by the side of which stood a tree of noble height and 
very fair to gaze upon ; and when he went and stood beneath 
it, in wonder at its height and comeliness, of a sudden he him 
self became so tall that he touched the top of the tree and 
bent it down to the earth quite easily. 1 Francis related his 
dream to the brethren, not doubting that God had sent it him 
to foreshadow the triumph of Poverty. To the eager, intense 
souls of these men everything indeed in heaven and earth 
seemed burdened with the destiny of their Lady Poverty : 
as in truth it was so far as they were concerned, so entirely 
and simply were they hers. 

As they were setting forth on their way to Rome, Francis 
had insisted that the brethren should choose one of their 
number, other than himself, to be their superior on the way. 
" He shall be our captain and as it were Christ s Vicar to 
us," he said ; " so that wheresoever he shall lead, we will go 
with him; and where he lodges we will lodge." The choice 
fell upon Bernard da Quintavalle. Then they took to the 

1 1 Celano, 33 ; 3 Soc. 53 ; Leg. Maj. in. 8. 
76 



THE BULE OF THE OBDEB 77 

road, singing the praises of God as they went along or else 
conversing with each other upon the things of the spirit which 
alone seemed to them worthy of many words. At times they 
would break their journey in some retired spot and give them 
selves to secret prayer, and when the evening drew in they 
sought shelter wherever they happened to find themselves. 
In this fashion they passed down the valley of Spoleto and 
crossed along the high plateau of Bieti and came into the 
lowlands of the Eoman Campagna and at length found them 
selves in Eome. For most of them it was their first visit to 
the Eternal City, and doubtless with that instinct of faith 
which was so strong in the Catholic people of those days, 
their first thoughts turned to the tomb of the Apostles in the 
great church of St. Peter on the Vatican Hill : for it was this 
which made Eome a holy city and in some sense the home 
of all Christians. As the brethren passed through the streets 
the people would momentarily wonder from what province 
these strangely garbed men had come, wholly unaware that 
they were looking upon men who were shortly to set the 
whole Christian world by the ears and to be the beginning of 
a moral revolution before which even Eome must bow in 
reverent homage. But the Eomans had seen too many strange 
penitents and reformers come to their city and pass away 
again forgotten or discredited, to be deeply interested at the 
appearance of any new comers, however strange might be 
their garb or conduct. And so these twelve brethren might 
make their way through the streets until they came to St. 
Peter s without arousing any but a passing wonder. They 
themselves were too engrossed in their sacred mission and in 
their reverence for the ground they trod, to take note of the 
passers by. Nor was there such a marked temperamental 
difference between the two cities the one they had come to 
and the other they had left to make them feel an entire 
strangeness even had they been less absorbed in their own 
affair. The contrast between Assisi and Eome which strikes 
one so forcibly to-day was not so palpable then. The pilgrim 
who now passes from the Eternal City to the city of Umbria, 
passes from the great highway where the world jostles pain- 



78 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSISI 

fully but inevitably against the spirit, into an old-world nook 
where the spirit broods in peace over the earth. Borne stands 
to-day, as ever in its history, as a spirit struggling with the 
world ; Assisi is as a spirit which has overcome and is now at 
rest. But in the thirteenth century Assisi was a hustling 
busy republic with an intensely aggressive consciousness of its 
own, with its bishop s court and its senate and its market 
place and its political parties, all very much alive and emulous 
in some measure even of the city of Borne in its institutions 
and ambitions. Life in Borne was on a larger scale, but it 
was not so different in quality or character that a citizen of 
Assisi could not easily fall in with its main preoccupations 
and habits. Even so Borne was such as to strike the imagi 
nation of a citizen of far greater cities than Assisi, and never 
more so than at this very period when Innocent III was 
bringing most of the Christian kingdoms into even temporal 
vassalage to the Holy SeeJ There was no movement in the 
life of Christendom, whether in imperial or national politics, 
or in the domain of thought, or in the strictly ecclesiastical 
sphere, which was not in some way or other brought to the 
Pope s council-board ; and Innocent wielded his growing 
authority with a noble magnificence which took account 
of the smaller things even as the greater. 1 No man perhaps 
has ever been the ruler of the earth as he was ; he schooled 
kings and imposed governments on peoples, and checked 
heresy, and did all a legislator could to reform morals : and 
all these activities were manifest in the gatherings of men at 
his court. There all that was most alive in Christendom 
might be found appealing, arguing or bowing before the 
Pope s command. 

To many men Innocent III has appeared merely as an 
ambitious statesman and theotocrat, whose ruling passion 
was to extend the dominion of the Papacy in temporal affairs ; 
they picture him skilfully playing off one political party against 
another or subduing with his iron resolution and sweeping 
statesmanship the rebellious secular powers. But there was 
another side to the character of Innocent. He was a deeply 
1 Cf. A. Luchairc, Innocent III : Rome et Vltalie, p. 233 seq. 



THE KULE OF THE OKDEK 79 

religious man, ascetic in his personal conduct and with a 
yearning desire to purify the Christian world and make its 
peoples, socially and individually, more conformed to the law 
of Christ. 1 Behind all his political ambitions for the Church 
was the aspiration to leave the Christian world purer and 
more godly than he found it ; and it can safely be said that 
he viewed the extension of the authority of the Papacy in 
temporal affairs as a means to the world s purification. He 
may have been right or wrong in thinking that temporal 
power would strengthen the Holy See for its spiritual mission ; 
about that men will argue as long as the world lasts. But 
there can be no doubt that the ultimate purpose of the great 
Pope was to create a theocracy of the Christian nations under 
whose sway the Gospel would be better realized in all spheres 
of the world s life. ~ Nobody was more conscious than himself 
that this purification must be begun in the ranks of the clergy : 
and he was not blind to the inherent strength of the reform- 
irig^sects ^wiiich:, however ^tfbublesbme they might be to the 
auth~orities,-and- even- heretical: as~ they frequently became, yet 
pointed with undeniable though bitter truth to the radical 
evil of luxury and secular greed which had fastened upon 
laity and clergy alike in the higher ranks of society. 2 

The almost utter hopelessness of the task of reform which 
he had set himself, made the sadness of his days. Yet he 
never relinquished his efforts. He chose as cardinals men of 
like mind in this matter with himself. If he fostered a 
crusade to crush by force of arms the wide-spreading sect 
of the Albigenses, it must be remembered that this sect 
was political as well as religious, and menaced established 

1 He was the author of an ascetical treatise De contemptu mundi which 
was for long in great vogue. His sermons breathe a spirit of burning piety. 

2 Innocent in 1201 approved the Rule of the Humiliati an orthodox 
society which was nevertheless suspected by many of the bishops ; he also 
received the submission of Durandus d Huesca in 1209 and of Bernhard 
Primus in 1210, and commissioned them to continue their preaching. Cf. A. 
Luchaire, Innocent III: la Croisade des Albigeois, p. 105 ; Migne, Innocentii 
III Regest. Lib. XII, LXIX. 

Innocent s more pacific attitude of mind towards the heretics is in strik 
ing contrast to the unsparing ferocity of some of the bishops. Cf. Migne, op. 
cit. Lib. II, CGXXVIII ; A. Luchaire, op. cit. p. 58 seq. 



80 LIFE OF ST. FKANGIS OF ASSISI 

authority both civil and ecclesiastical. Even here Innocent 
did not trust to the secular arm alone, but endeavoured to 
arouse the monastic orders to meet the heretical movements 
in spiritual warfare by sending forth itinerant preachers in 
whom sound orthodoxy would be strengthened by a severe 
asceticism and blameless life. 1 

But the dead hand of formalism weighed heavily upon 
the Pope s efforts to stem the tide of the heretical reforming 
movements : they grew in strength and audacity in spite of 
crusades and delegated preachers. Even within the confines 
of the Papal territories the heretics bade defiance to the Pope. 2 
The truth was that the reforming movements, whether heret 
ical or orthodox (and they were mostly heretical or suspect) 
voiced a vital discontent which was felt by all the more spiritu 
ally-minded Catholics, even by the Pope himself. Merely 
repressive or argumentative measures can never take away 
a vital discontent, and whilst that remains, heresy will always 
be latent or active until the discontent gives place to a new 
spiritual contentment or whittles away into sheer spiritual 
indifference. 

As yet the Church had not been able to put forth any 
convincing fact which would make people recognize that it 
contained within itself the satisfying truth for which the soul 
of Christendom was ahungered. What this truth was, men 
could only tell in a negative fashion : it was not found in any 
of the actual ecclesiastical institutions or tendencies which 
they saw with their eyes ; and not finding there what they 
wanted, they easily concluded that the whole ecclesiastical 
system was altogether wrong, and a mere bondage of the 
spirit. Nor could the authorized preachers, even the most 
sympathetic, convince them otherwise. These, the sym 
pathetic preachers, might deplore the evils in the Church, 

1 Innocent would gladly have avoided recourse to the secular arm, though 
when he found pacific measures unavailing, he fostered the crusade with 
characteristic energy. Of. A. Luchaire, loc. cit. 

2 Both at Viterbo and Orvieto the Patarini were strong enough to elect 
members of their sect as consuls. Of. Migne, Innocentii III Regest. Lib. II, 
1, ccvii. ; Lib. VIII, CCLVIII. Of. Acta SS. Mail, torn, v, p. 86 seq. A. Luch 
aire, Innocent III : Borne et Vltalie, pp. 84-91. 



THE EULE OF THE OKDEE 81 

and argue that these evils were merely the wounds which j 
wicked men had inflicted upon the pure body of Christ : but / 
the wounds were visible, gaping before the common eye. 
Some held fast to the faith of the preachers, and set them 
selves to wait prayerfully till the mystery should be cleared. 
But these were the few. Many more looked on, cynical or 
indifferent, while the preachers preached. Meanwhile the 
heretics were aggressive and made headway with the people. 
Perhaps to some of the waiting believers there came a vision of 
the prophet who was to bring freedom and joy to their souls, 
a man not tied to the traditions which hampered the liberty 
and dimmed the sight of the orthodox preachers, but one who 
with the simplicity of genius would draw forth the truth in its 
living beauty from the encasement of the traditions, and re 
veal it to orthodox and heretic alike as the legitimate offspring 
of the Catholic Faith. But in what fashion such a one would 
appear, and how he would present himself to the world, would 
remain even to the visionaries a mystery : for no man yet has 
painted the coming dawn. 

It is quite possible that Pope Innocent had had his visions 
of the needed reformer : for Innocent was a mystic as well 
as a genius, and to both is given a liberty of mind which 
the established conventions cannot contain ; yet when the 
moment of recognition came, the Pope at first could not see 
clearly and Francis met with a rebuff. 

It was in the corridor of the Lateran palace that these 
two men first met. Pope Innocent was walking to and fro, 
his mind engrossed in his schemes, when Francis, who in his 
simplicity had thought to seek out the Pope direct, appeared 
before him and began to set forth his petition. But the 
Pope, thinking him a mere fanatic, curtly bade him begone. 1 

Francis went out, and shortly afterwards had the good 

1 Vide the addition to the Leg. Maj. in. 9 [ed. Quaracchi, 1898, p. 28, n. 1], 
by Jerome of Ascoli. 

Jerome was St. Bonaventure s successor in the Generalate of the Order. 
He said he received his knowledge of this incident from the Pope s nephew. 
Cf. Anal. Fratic. in. p. 365. Matthew of Paris (Hist. ed. Watts, p. 340) 
relates a curious story how the Pope, on first meeting Francis, bade him " go 
and roll himself in the mire with the pigs ". 

6 



82 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

fortune to meet the Bishop of Assisi, who was then on a visit 
to the Papal Court. The bishop had no knowledge of Francis 
coming, and meeting him unexpectedly in the Eternal City, 
was at first alarmed. He thought that perhaps these peni 
tents had quitted Assisi for good. But when Francis had 
told his purpose he at once promised his support. 

Bishop Guido knew quite well the difficulties which 
would beset Francis and his petition. One needs a friend 
at court if one is to be heard there ; and besides it was 
already being said that there were too many of these new 
penitential fraternities springing up, much to the detri 
ment of the older monastic Orders. 1 So like a prudent man 
of affairs, the bishop set himself to gain the interest of an 
influential cardinal. None, he knew, would be more likely 
to befriend these penitents of his, than the Cardinal John of 
St. Paul, Bishop of Sabina. This prelate was a man of 
saintly life, noted amongst all the reforming cardinals of 
Innocent s Court, for his personal detachment from the 
world and his spiritual mind. To him then Francis was 
now introduced. The cardinal was already well disposed, 
having heard from Bishop Guido all about the wonderful 
renunciation and zeal of this new reformer; and he must 
,/.. have heard too of his reverence for the bishop and clergy, 
which was something unusual in the reformers of the time. 
Yet with the native conservatism of a statesman, he could 
not see why a new Order should be created : better surely 
would it be for these men to enter an established Order : it 
would be the safer course and their fervour would help to 
bring the older Orders back to their first perfection. His 
advice, therefore, was that they should lay aside their peti 
tion and enter a monastery. But Francis was firm sweetly 
and humbly firm in his conviction that God had called him 
< neither to the monastic nor the eremitical life as already 
established, but to a new and simple observance of the 
Gospel. And after a few days the cardinal too was con 
vinced. He saw in these men a spirit different from any he 

1 Five years later the Fourth Lateran Council forbade the institution of 
new Orders. 



THE KULE OF THE OKDEK 83 

had yet observed, and he felt that here was something new 
in the designs of God for the Church. With this conviction 
he determined to bring Francis into the Pope s presence, and 
to plead his cause. 

So once again Francis was at the feet of Pope Innocent ; 
but now the way had been prepared and the stern countenance 
of the great Pontiff was intent to hear what he had to say 
for himself and his brethren. Quite simply Francis set forth 
the Kule of life he desired to follow with the Pope s sanction. 
There was a movement of dissent among the attendant 
cardinals as Francis proclaimed his purpose to live in abso 
lute poverty without any provision for the morrow save his 
trust in God s providence and the charity of man ; to carry 
nothing on his journeys through the world nor to resist 
when an injury should be done to him ; to serve his neigh 
bours and to work as the poor, and to eschew all power and 
authority over others. To some it appeared to wear a danger 
ous resemblance to the innovations of the reformers ; to all it 
seemed an impossible rule beyond human endurance, to all \ 
that is, except the Cardinal John of St. Paul, who rose up to 
answer the objectors. " If we reject the petition of this poor 
man," he said, " as something novel and too hard to fulfil, 
when all he asks is that the law of life of the Gospel be con 
firmed unto him, let us beware lest we offend against the 
Gospel of Christ. For if anyone shall say that in the observ-j 
ance of evangelical perfection and the vow to observe it, 
there is contained anything new or irrational or impossible of 
observance, such a one is convicted of a blasphemy against 
Christ the Author of the Gospel." At that the Pope, in 
homage to the saintly cardinal, said to Francis : " My son, go 
and pray to Jesus Christ that He may show us His will ; and 
when we know His will more certainly, we shall the more 
safely sanction your pious purpose ". l 

It was an anxious moment for the brethren, but Francis 
was confident. " He ran trustfully to Christ and began to 
pray, bidding his brethren do the same," says the chroni- 

1 Leg. Maj. m. 9; 3 Soc. 47-49; I Celano, 32-33; II Celano, 16; 
Anon. Perus, loc. cit. p. 590. 

6* 



84 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSISI 

cler. During his prayer this parable came to him as from 
some interior voice : A certain woman, very poor but beauti 
ful, dwelt in a desert. And there was a king who loved her 
because of her exceeding beauty. With joy he wedded her 
and begot of her most handsome sons. Now these sons 
grew up, nurtured in all gentleness, and then their mother 
spoke to them, saying : " My dear sons, be not ashamed 
because you are poor, for you are all the sons of a great king. 
Gladly therefore go to his court and ask of him whatever is 
necessary to you." They, hearing these words, marvelled 
and were glad and being lifted up at this declaration of their 
royal lineage and knowing themselves to be heirs to the 
king, esteemed their very need as riches. Boldly they pre 
sented themselves before the king, nor were they timid 
before the face of him whose likeness they bore. And the 
king recognizing in them the likeness unto himself, wonder- 
ingly inquired whose sons they might be. They told him 
they were the sons of the poor woman who dwelt in the 
desert. At that the king embraced them and said: "My 
sons and heirs you are : fear not. If strangers are fed at my 
table, by a greater right must I nourish them for whom all 
my possessions are lawfully kept." And afterwards the king 
gave order unto the woman that she should send to his court 
all the sons that should be born of her, that they might be 
nurtured there. 1 

With this parable on his lips, Francis presented himself 
at the next audience to which he was shortly bidden : 
adding as he finished the recital : " Holy Father, I am that 
poor woman whom God so loved and of His mercy hath so 
honoured ". 

Pope Innocent listened in astonishment to this trouba 
dour in penitent s garb : it was a new experience even in his 
full life, and perhaps at that moment the light began to enter 
the Pontiff s mind and he dimly saw that what the world 
needed for its purification was the spirit of the troubadour 
converted to the service of Christ. He now felt a strange 
drawing to this man whom he had at first repulsed, and a 

1 II Celano, 16 ; 3 Soc. 50 ; Leg. Maj. in. 10 ; Anon. Perus, ut supra. 



THE BULE OF THE OEDEE 85 

dream he had once had, came back to his mind and seemed 
to him to be receiving a fulfilment in fact. He had dreamt 
that the Church of St. John Lateran, the mother church of 
Christendom, was about to fall, and a religious, small of 
stature and lowly of appearance was holding it up, by setting 
his back against it. It seemed to him now that Francis was 
the i jDaan of-feis dream, 1 and without further hesitation he 
declared his good-will and gave a verbal sanction to the Eule 
which had been laid before him. Then Francis promised 
obed4encje-to~-the Pope, and when he had thus promised, the 
Pontiff bade the other brethren promise obedience to Francis. 
Thus was the Franciscan family formally constituted and 
provisionally-admitted into the law of the Church : for with 
the cautiousness proper to a statesman, Innocent reserved a 
more solemn and definite approbation until such time as the 
new fraternity had proved itself..-/ Finally, Innocent having 
thus recognized the brethren, gavd them his pontifical authority 
to preach penance to the people ; that is to say, not to ex- /f\ 
pound the dogmas of the faith as did the regular preachers 
who were trained theologians, but to exhort the people to 
live well and avoid evil and love God. fl^Go forth with the 
Lord, brothers," he said to them, "and as the Lord shall 
deign to inspire you, do ye preach repentance unto all men. / 
But when God Almighty shall have multiplied you in 
numbers and in grace, come again to me rejoicing and I will 
grant more unto you than this and with a greater assurance 
commit to you greater powers." 2 

That day there was one man at the Papal court who was 
unfeignedly satisfied with the issue of the brethren s petition. 
The Cardinal John of St. Paul had, in the few days of their 

1 II Celano, 17 ; 3 Soc. 51 ; Leg. Maj. in. 10. 

2 1 Celano, 33 ; 3 Soc. 51 ; Leg. Maj. in. 10. The preaching of 
penance was a recognized faculty in the Middle Ages and was frequently 
conceded to laymen. Such preaching implied moral exhortations, but 
excluded the expounding of the articles of faith and the sacraments. Vide 
Letter of Innocent III to the ministers of the Humiliati, " Incumbit nobis," 
7 June, 1201 (Tiraboschi, Veiera Humil. Mon. ; i p. 128). Cf. P. Hilarin 
Pelder, Histoire des Etudes dans Vordre Franciscain, p. 39 seq. Pope 
Innocent had commissioned the Humiliati in 1201 ; in 1209 he had given an 
even more general permission to Durandus de Huesca and Bernhard Primus. 



86 LIFE OF ST. FEANCIS OF ASSISI 

sojourn in Eome, come to hold them in great reverence and 
affection, and he purposed to take them under his particular 
protection at the Boman court, and be, as it were, a father 
under God to these poor men. 1 

Before they departed he conferred upon them all the small 
tonsure, 2 the mark of the clerical state, that thereby they 
might have the greater freedom and authority in their preach- 
ing. But in his heart there was also the desire to wed these 
joyous, humble penitents to the ecclesiastical hierarchy, as an 
example to other clerics and for the purifying of the clerical 
order itself. 3 

Here the reader may be curious, as many have been before 
^ him, to know more precisely what this Bule was which Pope 
Innocent sanctioned, and in what manner it was set forth. 
For the Bule of the Friars Minor underwent many changes 
and modifications before it was finally sealed with the solemn 
and written approbation of Pope Honorius III in 1223. 
That final Bule reflects many issues and experiences in the 
development, of the fraternity, which Francis in these earlier 
years never contemplated : and in it the fine idealism of his 
aspiration is somewhat tempered by the exigencies of the 
world, as pure gold is mixed with harder metal to serve the 
uses of men. /It was indeed necessary to beat out the finer, 
heroic spirit 7 of the founder of the fraternity with an admix 
ture of more earthly wisdom for the multitude which gathered 
to him after the first enthusiasm had begun to wane : so only 
do the idealists retain a following whether in the Church or 
outside it. But those who love the memory of Francis will 
always turn to the early days of his story before the world 
made his spirit anxious, searching those early years with a 

1 Of. 3 Soc. 48 : " Volebat ex tune sicut unus de fratribus reputari ". 

2 " Fecit coronas parvulas fieri," says St. Bonaventure (Leg. Maj. in. 10) : 
evidently as distinguished from the larger monastic tonsure. Even to the 
end of his days Francis refused to wear the large tonsure : of. II Celano, 193. 
Some say that it was at this time that Francis also received the diaconate. 
Of. Wadding, Annales, ad an. 1210. 

3 A similar thought was in the mind of Cardinal Ugolino later on, when 
he proposed to take the bishops from the new orders of Franciscans and Do 
minicans. Of. Spec. Perfect, [ed. Sabatier], cap. 43. 



THE EULE OF THE OEDEE 87 

wistful tenderness as men always search out the story of 
youth. 

Unhappily the parchment which was inscribed with that 
early Eule seems not to have been preserved when in later 
years Francis found it necessary to rewrite his Eule with 
greater detail ; and to-day they who would listen to the Eule 
which Pope Innocent blessed at the instance of the Cardinal 
John of St. Paul, must disentangle the primitive passages- 
from the later accumulating additions with which they are 
conjoined in what came to be known as the " FiraLEule^_or 
"the Eule of 1221": a compilation which grew out of the 
primitive Eule and capitular decrees and Papal ordinances and 
which Francis, with the aid of BrotherCsesar of tSpeyer, jmt- 
into its present form in the year 1221. l Elsewhere in this 
book the reader will find an analysis of this compilation, 2 
setting forth the component parts in detail, but here we will 
put down those passages which unhesitatingly we may ac 
cept as primitive. A few other regulations there may have 
been, which now we cannot determine, but they would be of 
lesser importance, for the Eule as here set down reflects 
faithfully the life of the first brethren as history records it ; 
and nothing in that life is lacking in the Eule : one is a 
faithful mirror of the other. 

The Primitive Eule, then, began in strict Catholic fashion .> 
with the invocation of the most Holy Trinity. A preliminary 
declaration promised obedience to the Pope, and then the 
Eule proper ran in this wise : 

The Rule and life of the brothers is this : namely, to live in obedi 
ence, in chastity and without property, and to follow the teaching and in 
the footsteps of our Lord Jesus Christ Who says : " If thou wilt be perfect, 
go, sell what thou hast and give to the poor and thou shalt have treasure 
in heaven ; and come follow Me " ; 3 also : " If any man will come after Me, 
let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow Me " ; 4 again : f If 
any man come to Me and hate not his father and mother and wife and 
children and brethren and sisters, yea and his own life also, he cannot 

lr This " First Rule " of 1221 must not be confused with the Rule of 1223 
above referred to. 

2 Vide Appendix I : " The Primitive Rule of St. Francis," pp. 393-403. 

3 Matt. xix. 21. 4 Matt. xvi. 24. 



88 LIFE OF ST. FEANCIS OF ASSIST 

be My disciple ; l and everyone that hath left father or mother, brethren 
or sisters, wife or children, houses or lands, for My sake shall receive a 
hundred-fold and shall possess life everlasting ". 2 

* * 
* 

If anyone by Divine inspiration shall wish to receive this life and 
shall come to our brethren, let him be received kindly by them. Which 
being done, he shall sell whatever he possesses and cause it to be given 
to the poor. 

And all the brethren shall be clothed in vile garments and they can 
patch them with sacking and other rags with the blessing of God ; for 
our Lord says in the Gospel : " They that are in costly apparel and live 
delicately and who are clothed in soft garments, are in the houses of 
kings ". 3 

None of the brothers shall have any power or domination especially 
amongst themselves. For so the Lord says in the Gospel : " The princes 
of the gentiles lord it over them and they that are the greater, exercise 
power upon them : it shall not be so amongst the brethren ; but whoso 
ever will be the greater amongst them let him be their minister and 
servant ; " and "he who is the greater amongst them let him become as 
the lesser ". 4 Neither shall any brother do evil or speak evil unto another ; 
nay rather by the charity of the spirit shall they voluntarily serve and 
obey each other. And this is the true and holy obedience of our Lord 
Jesus Christ. 

V 

The brethren who know how to work, shall work and exercise the 
same craft which they know, if it be not against their soul s salvation and 
they can honestly exercise it. For the prophet says: "Because that 
thou shalt eat the labours of thy hands, blessed art thou and it shall be 
well with thee ; " 5 and the apostle says : " he who will not work, neither 
let him eat ; " 6 and let every man abide in the craft and office wherein he 
is called. 7 And for their labour they may receive whatever is needful, 
except money. And should it be necessary, they may go asking alms like 
other brothers. 

*** 

Let all the brothers endeavour to follow in the humility and poverty 
of our Lord Jesus Christ and let them remember that of all the world it 
behoves them to have nothing save as the Apostle says : "having food 
and wherewith to be covered, with these we are content". 8 And they 
ought to rejoice when they consort with rude and despised persons, with 
the poor and weak and sick and lepers and those who beg by the wayside. 

And should it be necessary they may go begging. 

# # 

ft 

1 Luke xix. 26. 2 Of. Matt. xix. 29. 3 Luke vii. 25. 

4 Of. Matt. xx. 25-27 ; xxm. 11. 5 Psalm cxxvu. 2. 

6 2 Thess. in. 10. 7 Cf. 1 Cor. vii. 24. 8 1 Tim. vi. 8. 



THE KULE OF THE OKDEE 89 

And all the brothers shall beware lest they calumniate anybody, and 
let them not contend in words ; l nay rather let them have a care to keep 
silence whenever the Lord grants them this grace. ^KgitW IRJ-, hham 
argue between themselves nor with others, but let them have a care to 

reply humbly : " We are unprofitable servants ". 2 

*** 

When the brethren go through the world they shall carry nothing by 
the way, neither purse nor scrip nor bread nor money nor staff ; and into 
whatsoever house they enter they shall first say : Peace be to this house ; 
and in the same house remaining, they shall eat and drink what things 
are set before them. 3 And let them not resist evil; 4 but if anyone 
should strike them on the cheek let them offer to him the other ; and if 
anyone take away their garment, let them not forbid him the tunic also. 
They shall give to everyone who asketh them ; and if anyone take away 
their goods let them not ask again. 5 

*** 

All the brethren shall be Catholics and live and speak after the 
manner of Catholics. But should anyone of them stray from the Catholic 
faith or life in word or in deed and will not amend, lie shall be altogether 

cast out from our fraternity. And all clerics and all religious let us hold 
as our lords in respect of those things which regard the salvation of the 
soul and do not deviate from our religion ; 6 and their order and office 
and ministration we must hold in reverence in the Lord. 

V 

And this and similar exhortation and praise, all my brothers may an 
nounce with the blessing of God, whenever it shall please them and 
amongst whatsoever people: "Fear and honour, praise and bless, give 
thanks unto and adore the Lord God Almighty in Trinity and Unity, 
Father, Son and Holy Ghost, Creator of all ". Do penance ; 7 bring forth 
fruits worthy of penance, 8 for know that ye shall all quickly die. Give 
and it shall be given unto you. 9 Forgive and you shall be forgiven. 10 
And if you will not forgive men their sins neither will the Lord forgive 
you your sins. 11 Confess all your sins. 12 Blessed are they who shall die 
in penance for they shall be in the kingdom of heaven. Woe to those 
who shall not die in penance, because they shall be the children of the 
devil, whose works they do, 13 and they shall go into everlasting fire. 

Beware and abstain from all evil and persevere unto the end in 
good. 

1 Of. 2 Tim. 14. 2 Luke xvn. 10. 3 Luke ix. 3 ; x. 4-8. 

4 Of. Matt. v. 39. 5 Cf. Luke vi. 29-30. 

6 The word "religion " here means the Rule of the Order. 

7 Matt. in. 2. 8 Luke in. 8. 9 Luke vi. 38. 

10 Luke vi. 37. n Mark xi. 26. 12 James v. 16. 

13 Of. John vni. 44. 



90 LIFE OF ST. FRANCIS OF ASSISI 

Then followed a brief exhortation to the brethren faith 
fully to hold and guard all these words ; and the Rule ended 
with the doxology : " Glory be to the Father and to the Son 
and to the Holy Ghost : as it was in the beginning, is now 
and ever shall be, world without end. Amen." 

And now perhaps, reader, you will better understand and, 
maybe, sympathize with the hesitating prelates who heard 
this Rule put forth as the constitution of a new society. But 
to rightly appreciate their hesitation and dissent, you must 
remember the men who stood before them with this Rule as 
their expected charter. They were not trained legalists who, 
it might be assumed, would interpret the simple heroism of 
these naked Gospel precepts into some compromise with the 

weakness of human nature Quite evidently they took the 

words literally and without any gloss. They had already 
shown their mettle ; had utterly renounced all their property 
and become common labourers and beggars ; had put aside 
all titles of honour and would not willingly exercise any 
authority or hold power over others ; had already shown 
themselves non-resisters to the evil men did to them. And 
upon these principles they would found a new society ! 

Nine hundred and ninety-nine men out of every thousand 
would pause before approving of such a scheme. It is one 
thing to set heroic laws as counsels for individual perfection ; 
quite another thing to bind a body of men with the State s 
sanction, to the observance of uttermost perfection : and such 
it seemed was what Francis asked. Politicians and men 
of affairs do not readily make alliance with extreme and 
unconventional courses or with policies which contemplate 
no looking backwards. Such courses and policies are the 
heritage of poets and prophets and other idealists, or of 
mystics and saints. 

Fortunately for Francis, the poet and saint, there was 
the saintly Cardinal of St. Paul ; still more fortunate that 
Pope Innocent and many of his counsellors were men in 
whom the mysticism of religion blended curiously with the 
statesmanship of the world. 



THE BULE OF THE ORDER 91 

The Primitive Rule was, in fact, the programme of an 
adventure of faith ; and it was in the spirit of high adventure 
that Pope Innocent approved it. But Innocent himself had 
ever been bold in adventure for the faith which was in him, 
as his successors learned when they came to steer the heri 
tage he left them, amidst the shoals of secular diplomacy. 
And stern, forbidding in his aloofness, and magnificent as 
the pontiff was, he perhaps felt a certain spiritual kinship 
with the gentle, lowly Francis, in the adventurousness of 
faith which was common to them both. 



BOOK II. 

CHAPTEE I. 
RIVO-TORTO. 

WHEN Francis and his company left Eome after their re 
ception by Pope Innocent, their one thought was to prove 
themselves worthy of the Pope s confidence. The gracious- 
ness of the Pontiff had warmed and lifted their hearts : they 
had all the joy of the born soldier in receiving his first 
commission. 

Before leaving the city they had bade adieu at the tombs 
of the Apostles : then they had turned their faces once more 
towards Umbria. This time they did not go by the moun 
tain valley of Bieti but they directed their steps across the 
low country which follows the line of the Tiber till it comes 
to the valley of the Nera. As they went along, the events of 
the past few days formed the subject of their conversation, 
and they discussed amongst themselves the wonderful mercies 
God had shown them and the Bule they had promised to ob 
serve and how best they might fulfil the work committed to 
them by Christ and His Vicar. So engrossed were they in 
their talk that they quite forgot the needs of the body, and 
at midday they found themselves in a lonely spot with no 
house within sight. They had walked since early morning 
and were now quite faint with weariness and hunger. Whilst 
they were wondering how they might procure some food in 
this human wilderness suddenly a man approached them 
carrying some bread which he willingly shared with them. 
Thus relieved, the brethren saw in the stranger s coming 
another instance of God s providence, and they continued 

92 



KIVO-TOETO 93 

their journey, still more convinced that God would never fail 
them in their need. 1 

At length they came into the neighbourhood of Orte, 
where the Nera joins with the Tiber. Here at some distance 
from the town they found a quiet place where the ancient 
Etruscans in the long past had buried their dead. The cave- 
like tombs, now empty, offered shelter : so here the brethren 
purposed to abide awhile and give themselves to prayer and 
meditation : for they felt the need of collecting and strength 
ening their souls energies in uninterrupted communion with 
God at this new beginning of their vocation. 

For fifteen days they abode in this place : every day some 
of them would go into the town and beg food. If after the 
common meal, anything were left over, they gave it to the 
poor who passed by or they placed it in one of the tombs to 
supply part of the next day s meal. But at the end of the 
fifteen days they determined to proceed on their way. A 
subtle temptation had come into their retreat : the solitude was 
becoming very sweet to them and they had begun to argue 
amongst themselves whether they could not better fulfil their 
vocation by abiding apart from the haunts of men and giving 
themselves wholly to a life of contemplation and prayer. 
None felt the attraction of solitude more than Francis him 
self ; but as he pondered prayerfully upon it, he grew con 
vinced that it held a betrayal of his proper vocation. The 
poor knight of Christ must have no abiding place on earth, 
but wander through the world to win souls to God. So they 
broke up this encampment. 2 They passed along the course 
of the turbulent Nera through the dark well-wooded valley 
which leads into the open spaces of the valley of Spoleto, and 
so on to Assisi. 

They did not now settle at the Porziuncola : it may be 
that they were too many in number for the tiny shelter 
Francis had built there ; or it may be that Francis felt a 
scruple in claiming, as it were, a permanent abode anywhere 
after the temptation which came to him in the wilderness 
near Orte. Whatever the reason may have been, they lodged 
1 1 Gelano, 34 ; Leg. Maj. iv. 1. 2 1 Celano, 34-5. 



94 LIFE OF ST. FRANCIS OF ASSISI 

on their return, in a derelict shelter at Rivo-Torto, 1 a dis 
trict which lies within a half-hour s walk from the city as 
you look across the plain to Cannara. It was not far from 
the leper settlement at Santa Maria Maddalena, and one 
could easily reach the chapel of the Porziuncola through the 
wood in as quick time as it takes to get into the city. 2 

The shelter, however, was never built to give housing to 
twelve men, and because the brethren in their solicitude for 
each other would be apt to remain outside in the open that 
others might have more comfort inside, Francis took a piece 
of chalk and marked on the wall a place for each one, where 
he might rest and pray when his day s work was over. 

Here the brethren lodged it would seem far into the fol 
lowing winter or longer. Things went hard with them at 
times in the way of bodily comfort. Not only was there the 
cramped space but now and then there was also a lack of 
food, even of the poor fare they were now accustomed to. 
Some days they had to appease their hunger with mangels, 
the food of beasts. 8 

They do not appear to have undertaken any long mission 
ary journeys at this time. It may be that Francis thought 
it more prudent to exercise his little band in the more inti- 

1 "qiioddam tugurium ab Jwminibus derelictum," says 3 Soc. 55. 

2 There has been much controversy over the actual site of the shelter at 
Rivo-Torto. In the sixteenth century a church was built upon a supposed 
site. It is standing to-day and the custodians have no doubt at all about its 
claim. 

M. Sabatier (Spec. Perfect, p. 95, n. 1) asserts that the shelter was 
close to the leper settlement of Santa Maria Maddalena, basing his assertion 
on the words of Bartholi, who describes the shelter as " ultra Sanctam Mariam 
(i.e. de Portiuncula) per spatium parvis miliaris juxta hospitale leprosorum". 
But Bartholi s measurements cannot be taken as accurate. However from 
the words of 3 Soc. 55 : Reliquerunt igitur dictum tugurium ad usum pau- 
perum leprosorum, it seems probable that the shelter was nearer to the Leper 
settlement than the present church of Eivo-Torto. Here I would like to ap 
peal for a more reverent care of the chapels of Santa Maria Maddalena and 
San Buffino d Arce, than they are given at present. No ground in the neigh 
bourhood of Assisi is more sacred to the memory of Francis than these places, 
where he so frequently nursed the lepers. May we hope that the day will 
come when they will be placed in a more reverent custody ? 

3 3 Soc. 55. 



KIVO-TOKTO 95 

mate ways of the poverty they had vowed, in manual labour 
and services for the lepers, and in the habit of self-discipline 
and prayer. 1 Perhaps it was that the political turmoil and 
troubles which had come upon Umbria, made missionary work 
on a larger scale inexpedient for these neophytes. For the 
forces of the emperor Otho IV, who had been crowned by 
the Pope in the preceding year, and had broken his oath of 
fidelity to the Holy See, were now over-running the valley of 
Spoleto, laying waste the territories of Perugia and reducing 
all Umbria to the imperial power. At the beginning of the 
year, Otho had invested one of his captains, Dipold of Acerra, 
with the duchy of Spoleto, vacant since the exclusion of Con 
rad of Lutzen; and when, on 28 February, Perugia pro 
mised to defend the patrimony of the Holy See, Otho at once 
let loose his army to ravage and bring into subjection the 
Umbrian cities : and all that year the country knew no peace. 
In the autumn Otho made an armed progress through the 
valley on his way to Bieti. It was probably on this occasion 
that Francis .sent one of the brethren to meet the emperor as 
he was passing by and to announce to him that his power 
would be of short duration. 2 In this fashion did the brethren 
in these early days at Eivo-Torto chiefly fulfil their mission 
ary duty, by announcing their message to the passers-by or 
to the people amongst whom they worked. 

But Francis himself did more. On his return from Home 
he began to preach not only in the open places of the city 
but in the churches. The first church in which he preached 

1 1 Celano, 45. 

2 Ibid., 43; where, however, the chronicler seems to imply that this in 
cident happened as Otho was on his way to Borne to receive the imperial 
crown ("ad suscipiendam coronam "). But Otho seems not to have gone by 
Assisi on his way to Rome, but by Viterbo (cf. F. Boehmer, Eegesta Imperil, 
v. p. 96). 

After his coronation, however, Otho passed by Assisi in December, 1209, 
and again on his way to Bieti in 1210. He was at Bieti in the November of 
that year ; in which same month he was excommunicated by the Pope (cf. 
Boehmer, ibid. p. 103 and pp. 126-7 ; Gregorovius, Hist, of the City of Rome, 
[Engl. transl.], Vol. V, part i. pp. 86-93. Not improbably Otho s shameless 
pillaging of the Papal territories brought upon him the prophetic warning of 
Francis. 



96 LIFE OF ST. FRANCIS OF ASSIST 

was the little church of San Giorgio, 1 where Bernard da 
Quintavalle had distributed his goods to the poor. 

Shortly afterwards the canons of the Cathedral invited 
him to preach every Sunday in the Cathedral itself. 2 These 
sermons took place in the early morning when the Italian 
people love best to flock to the churches for Mass ; and Francis, 
perhaps for greater recollection, went into Assisi on the Satur 
day evening and lodged the night in a house in the canons 
garden adjoining the Cathedral. There he slept his brief sleep, 
and then arose to prepare for his discourse by long hours of 
prayer. 3 

It is difficult to describe the effect of Francis appear 
ance in the pulpit of the Cathedral. One must have seen 
an Italian congregation hanging upon the words of a popular 
preacher to realize the scene. They are an impressionable 
people easily provoked to tears or laughter, to applause or 
scorn. They are quick to detect insincerity and are apt to 
despise a laboured effort. He who would win them, must speak 
heart to heart, and they love to have the message put before 
them dramatically, with gesture and movement. The whole 
man, body and soul, must speak if they are to listen. And 
when they are moved they respond in the same entire human 
fashion. They utter their approval or dissent, sometimes in 
words, sometimes in gesture, sometimes in a tense attitude 
of the whole body. Francis himself was typically Italian 
in temperament and character. When he felt strongly, his 
whole body reflected his emotion. Unconsciously and with 
out effort he would act his thoughts ; his words vibrated with 
the emotion of his heart, and arms and feet and all his body 
moved in unison with his speech. 4 Then he had that special 
gift of the moving speaker, a musical voice, easily able to 
modulate its utterance to the character of the emotions. 5 He 
lacked a fine presence, he was too small and spare ; and the 

1 Chron. Jordan!, No. 60 (Anal. Franc, i. p. 16) ; Leg. Maj. iv, 4. 

2 Leg. Maj. iv. 4. 

3 The room in which Francis lodged is still shown to the visitor to the 
Duomo of Assisi. 

4 Of. I Celano, 73, 86 : II Gelano, 107. 

5 " Vox vehemens, dulcis, clara atque sonora" (I Celano 83). 



EIVO-TOETO 97 

coarse, ill-shapen habit he wore rather distracted the eye from 
the delicacy of his features. 1 But the bodily presence of the 
man was forgotten as soon as he began to speak, and the 
inner fire of his spirit shot out its lightning flashes, dazzling 
the inward eye with the clearness of the truth he revealed 
in the consciences of his hearers. He had no studied rhetoric, 
he spoke straight from the fullness of the heart, in pithy sen 
tences brittle and swift. His language was homely, as it was 
spoken by the people themselves ; he borrowed none of the 
phrases of the schools : oftentimes the homeliness of the 
speech was elevated only by the sincerity of the speaker, at 
other times by the dramatic vividness of the thought or a 
poetic sensibility to nature. Not infrequently when people 
sought afterwards to recall his words, the words themselves 
fell flat or insipid apart from the fire of the spirit with which 
they were uttered. Francis power was in himself, not in his 
words. He brought them no new doctrine to arrest their 
thought ; he was as a flame enkindling the smouldering faith 
of his hearers: for awhile he would lift them up into the 
clear ardours of heaven, where their souls stood revealed to 
themselves and their hearts were aglow with unwonted desire 
of the higher life. And at such times " he seemed to those 
who beheld him as a man from another world, whose heart 
was set on Heaven and his face turned towards it, and who 
was seeking to draw them upwards with him". 2 Unflinch 
ingly he searched the consciences of his audience ; but there 
was a sympathy in his voice which left no sting but only 
a confession of the truth : it was as though he were voicing 
the hearts of those before him, now that they suddenly stood 
in the presence of God. 

An example of the substance of his preaching is found in 
the letters and written exhortations which he was accustomed 
to send to the people by the friars, at those times when sick 
ness prevented him from going abroad. Thus one can 
imagine him standing before the crowd of citizens in the 
Cathedral of Assisi, his whole body working with emotion , 

1 See the letter of Thomas of Spalatro. Of. infra, p. 302. 

2 Leg. Maj. iv. Of. II Celano, 107. 



98 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSISI 

his face tense in its earnestness, uttering some such words as 
these : " We must not be wise and prudent according to the 
flesh but rather must we be simple, humble and pure. Our 
bodies we must hold in opprobrium and contempt since all of 
us by our own fault are wretched and corrupt, rotten and 
worms, as the Lord tells us by His prophet : I am a worm 
and no man, the reproach of men and the outcast of the 
people. 1 And we must never desire to be set above others, 
but to be servants and subject to every human creature for 
God s sake. And all who shall do in this manner and persevere 
therein, upon them the spirit of the Lord shall rest, and He 
will make in them His dwelling-place and they shall be children 
of our heavenly Father, whose works they do; and they 
shall be the spouses, brethren, and mothers of our Lord Jesus 
Christ. We are His spouses when the faithful soul is united 
with Jesus Christ by the Holy Ghost. We are His brethren, 
when we do the will of His Father who is in Heaven. We 
are His mothers when we bear Him in our heart and our 
body by love and a pure and sincere conscience, and bring 
Him forth in holy deeds which must shine as an example to 
others. how glorious and holy and great it is to have a 
Father in heaven ! how holy, fair and lovable it is to 
have a Spouse in heaven ! how holy and delightful, pleas 
ing and humble, peaceful and sweet, amiable and above all 
things to be desired, is it to have such a Brother who laid 
down His life for His sheep and prayed to the Father for us, 
saying : Holy Father, keep in My name them whom Thou 
hast given Me ." 

Or again he might be denouncing the folly of avarice and 
usury, that folly which was at the root of so much of the 
bitterness which set class against class and family against 
family in hatred and frequent feuds : 

" Look to it ye blind, you who are deceived by your enemies, 
the flesh, the world, and the devil. Neither in this world nor 
in the next will you have any good thing. You think you 
will enjoy the vanities of this world, but you are deceived ; 
for the day and the hour comes, of which you think not, 
1 Psalm xxi. 6 (Vulgate). 



EIVO-TOETO 99 

which you know not and are ignorant of. The body sickens, 
death draws nigh. Kelatives and friends come and tell you : 
Place your affairs in order . And his wife and children, his 
relatives and friends make pretence to weep. Looking up 
he sees them weeping and is moved by an evil impulse, and 
considering cunningly within himself, he says to them : Be 
hold I put my body and soul and all that I have, into your 
hands . Truly accursed is this man who thus confidently 
places his body and soul and all that he has, into such hands. 
Wherefore the Lord says by the prophet : Accursed is the 
man who trusts in man . Then at once they bring in the 
priest ; and the priest says to him : Will you receive penance 
for all your sins ? He replies : I will . * Will you make 
satisfaction out of your goods as far as you can, for all the 
fraud and deception you have committed ? He replies : 
No . Then asks the priest : Why not ? Because, says 
he, I have already put all my goods into the hands of my 
relatives and friends. And he begins to lose his speech, and 
thus the wretched man dies a bitter death." l 

This dramatic figuring of the deathbed of the usurer or 
dishonest merchant would send many a man home with a 
chastened spirit, and such sermons were followed not in 
frequently by entire conversions, and there came distributions 
to the poor of ill-gotten wealth, and not a few put aside alto 
gether the unholy business of merchandize and took to less 
doubtful employments, such as cultivating the land. 2 

1 Both these passages are taken from Epistola I (Opuscula, ed. Quaracchi, 
pp. 93-4; 96-7). According to Wadding this letter was written in 1212 or 
1213 ; but others think it was written in the spring of 1215, when Francis 
was sick with fever. Undoubtedly, however, it sums up the teaching of the 
apostolate. Francis, as we know, never hesitated to repeat himself. Thus 
passages of this very letter are repeated again in the Regula Prima, cap. 
xxn. Of. Fr. Paschal Eobinson, The Writings of St. Francis, pp. 96-7. 

2 We find this very frequently happening later on with the tertiaries or 
secular followers of Francis. It was doubtless a practice inculcated by Francis 
from the beginning on those who sought his advice. He never spared the 
avarice engendered by the industrial movement of his time. For this reason 
it was that he insisted on his disciples giving their wealth to the poor and 
not to their relatives, because he considered that the money begotten of fraud 
could only be purified when given in alms. 

7 * 



100 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

But in all his sermons Francis never failed to urge upon 
the citizens the blessings of peace and mutual love nor to de 
nounce with pleading earnestness the spirit of hatred and 
envy which kept the commune in perpetual ferment, and the 
ambition for power which made the higher classes, whether 
nobles or burghers, bitterly hated by the lower class of citizen. 
It was the same in all the Italian communes : no sooner were 
they free from foreign domination, than the more wealthy 
began to usurp the government and tyrannize over the less 
wealthy, and faction was formed against faction and there 
was no common interest save when the German loomed up 
again to take away their independence : and oftentimes blood 
flowed freely in these internecine quarrels. Francis never 
tired of reiterating his cry of "Peace"! and when he 
preached the Christian glory of service and mutual subjection, 
the citizens knew that his mind s eye was upon the civic feud. 
Hard though it was to put off the ingrained habit of 
standing by one s own interest or ambition or by that of one s 
family or party, yet in the end his persistent pleading told 
and men began to utter the old party cries of hatred or arro 
gance with less assurance and even with shame. 

Those Sunday sermons in the Cathedral, backed by the 
life of the brethren at Kivo-Torto, were working their way 
into the conscience of the city. Of that there is no doubt. 
Assisi was coming to acknowledge a prophet in its son and 
submit to his sweet guidance. 

An event happened at the beginning of the winter of 
1210-1211, to which historians have pointed as an evidence of 
Francis influence. On 9 November, the citizens met in 
council and signed a treaty of concord amongst themselves. 
By this treaty the Majores or higher grade of citizens and the 
Minores or lower grade, bound themselves solemnly to work 
together for the honour and common good of Assisi, and 
each party promised to enter into no alliance with pope or 
emperor or king, nor with any city or town, nor with any 
person of power, without the consent of the whole commune. 
They were to respect each other s rights and henceforth to 
live in perpetual harmony. Exiles were to be allowed to 



KIVO-TORTO 101 

return ; the people who lived in the territories of the commune 
outside the city were to have equal rights with those who 
lived in the city itself, and the nobles were to renounce their 
feudal claims : taxes were fixed and were not to be assessed 
arbitrarily to any one s disadvantage. And so civic peace 
was to reign. 1 

It may be that the presence of the emperor s forces almost 
at their gates had something to do in bringing about this act 
of civic concord ; at least so far as bringing to reason those 
whom Francis words had not yet moved. Nevertheless they 
are doubtless right who connect this act of peace with Francis 
preaching. 

Meanwhile out at Eivo-Torto, Francis was fashioning his 
disciples to take their part in the apostolate which he had 
begun : nor did his work in the city distract him from this 
intimate solicitude for the men who had left all and followed 
him. As we have said, the brethren were at times in dire 
straits to supply even the barest necessities for their bodily 
support. But this in no way discouraged them. In their 
fervour of spirit they would oftentimes deny themselves in 
order to grow accustomed to do with as little sustenance as 
possible : for these men held that they were not really poor 
if they asked more of the charity of others than was really 
necessary ; and to receive more than they actually needed they 
deemed an abuse of others charity and a robbery of other 
poor. More than once Francis had need to rebuke their in 
discretion. One night the whole company was awakened by 
the cries of a young brother who thought he was dying. 
Francis arose and saw that it was sheer want of food that 
the brother was suffering from, and without more ado he got 
together what scraps of food were at hand and himself pre 
pared a meal. Then he sat down with the famished brother, 
and, to spare his shame, himself took a share. When they 
had eaten, Francis spoke his mind to the brethren standing 
round: "My best beloved," he said, "I tell you that each 
one of you ought to pay heed to his nature ; for some of you 
may be strong enough to be sustained on less food than 

1 A. Cristofani, op. cit. pp. 79-82. 



102 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSISI 

others ; yet it is my will that he who needs more food shall 
not be bound to imitate those who need less, but let each give 
to his body what it requires in order to be strong enough to 
serve the spirit. For whilst we must beware of that super 
fluity of food which is a hindrance both to body and soul ; in 
like manner, nay even more, must we beware of too great ab 
stinence, seeing that the Lord wills to have mercy and not 
sacrifice." 

On another occasion Francis, noticing that a brother was 
not well, rose early in the morning and took him to a neigh 
bouring vineyard, and choosing a spot near a good vine, sat 
down with the brother and together they ate of the grapes. 2 
In after years the brethren would relate these incidents to a 
younger generation to show what manner of man Francis 
was. 

And perhaps nothing in these first sensitive days made a 
greater impression on the mind of all the brotherhood, than 
Francis constant care for them, so maternal in its quick 
divining sympathy. He was as their very soul. He per 
ceived and felt their temptations and difficulties almost more 
clearly than themselves, and his word always brought comfort. 

No trouble was too trivial for his watchfulness. He had 
known too well the difficulties of those early days when a 
man sets forth to walk the higher road in response to the im 
perious call of the spirit ; he knew the elation and depression, 
the buoyant hope and the blank discouragement which make 
the first years of the spiritual life at once a delight and a 
torture. And as yet the brethren had not the vicarious se 
curity which an individual derives from an established order 
of things. The fraternity was only at the beginning of a 
corporate consciousness. The shelter of Bivo-Torto was not 
possessed of that spirit of place which was to come so swiftly 
to the Porziuncola. The one earthly mainstay of the brothers 
was Francis himself. Hence they clung to him as a child 

1 II Celano, 22 ; Spec. Perfect, cap. 27 ; Leg. Maj. v. 7. See also Eccles- 
ton, De adventu FF. Min. [ed. Little], col. xv. p. 106, where it is related how 
St. Francis compelled Albert of Pisa to take twice the quantity of food he was 
accustomed to take. 

2 II Celano, 176 ; Spec. Perfect, cap. 28. 



EIVO-TOETO 103 

clings to its mother, with a feeling of blind unreasoning con 
fidence. He was their oracle and law, the pledge that God 
was with them : and in this belief they found the strength 
they often needed in these critical days when their spiritual 
feet were yet uncertain of the hard earth they trod. How 
deeply this conviction had taken hold of them is shown by 
this incident. 

Francis had gone as usual one Saturday evening to the 
Cathedral to await his Sunday sermon. Now that night, 
whilst some of the brethren at Kivo-Torto were sleeping 
and others keeping vigil, suddenly they were all startled 
and there appeared to them a fiery chariot chasing to and 
fro in the shelter, and above the chariot was a ball of 
fire of surpassing brightness. At the same moment their 
souls were flooded with spiritual light and their consciences 
were revealed to each other. Seeking for an explanation 
of this marvel as they gathered together, the brothers con 
cluded that in the fiery chariot and ball of fire, Francis 
spirit had manifested its continual presence with them : 
and in this belief they were confirmed when, the next day, on 
his return, Francis was already aware of the mystery of the 
night. 1 Thus it was that whether in preaching to the people 
or in forming the brotherhood, his penetrating sympathy 
was as a spirit which moved over the waters, bringing light 
out of darkness and an abundant life out of the void. 

1 1 Celano, 47 ; Leg. Maj. iv. 4. 



CHAPTEE II 
THE PORZIUNCOLA. 

IN after years the place of the Porziuncola was to acquire 
a sort of sacramental significance in the story of Francis and 
his friars. It was the sanctuary wherein the sacred fire was 
deemed to be enshrined and kept alight and where the spirit 
of Francis was held to haunt the earth. 

Holy of Holies is this Place of Places, 
Meetly held worthy of surpassing honour ! 
Happy thereof the surname, " of the Angels," 
Happier yet the name, " The Blessed Mary ". 
Now a true omen the third name conferreth, 
"The Little Portion," on the Little Brethren : 
Here where by night a presence oft of Angels, 
Singing sweet hymns illumineth the watches. 

Here was the old world s broad highway made narrow, 
Here the way made broader for the chosen People ; 
Here grew the Rule ; here Poverty, our Lady, 
Smiting back pride, called back the Cross amongst us. 1 

So sang one in after times, uttering in verse the thoughts 
of many brethren. And to this day is the place of the Porziun 
cola held sacred in the Catholic Church next after the three 
holiest sanctuaries of the Holy Land, St. Peter s in Borne 
and St. James at Compostella. 

The old chroniclers tell how after Francis and the brethren 
had taken up their abode there, a certain devout man saw 
in a vision a great multitude of men gathered on bended 
knees around the little chapel, and they were all blind. With 
clasped hands and uplifted faces they were beseeching heaven 
in a loud and pitiable voice to give them light, when suddenly 

1 Spec. Perfect, cap. 84 [S. Evans translation]. 
104 




m. 



\ , 

C* 
I 
I 




THE POKZIUNCOLA 105 

from the sky there broke forth a great radiance which fell 
upon them all and restored their sight. 1 And indeed the 
Porziuncola was to bring light to many people who had been 
sitting in darkness, as all who know the story of Francis are 
aware. 

For three years past Francis had loved this chapel in the 
woods, and there he and his first disciples, as we have seen, 
had found their first meeting-place. It may seem strange 
that when he first bethought him of the need of a sort of 
nursery for this new brotherhood, he did not at once turn 
to the Porziuncola. Yet so it is often in life. The men and 
things that are destined to be most intimately bound up with 
our ultimate struggles and affections come to us in some sort 
as an afterthought or as a fate over-ruling our own decision. 
It may be that Francis in the beginning thought to have no 
permanent dwelling at all, and that only with the coming of 
new novices he grew convinced of the need of some dedicated 
spot where the spirit of the Lady Poverty might make for 
itself a shelter from the world for the training of the neo 
phytes. Then finding the shelter at Kivo-Torto unoccupied, 
it would be like Francis to take this as an indication of God s 
Providence and to seek no further for a lodging place ; he 
would hesitate to cast a longing desire upon any other spot 
however attractive, for in such desire he would see a sort of 
mental possession. His rule was to take what was freely 
given : he would never lay claim to anything. 

But Eivo-Torto was nevertheless not destined for long to 
be the nursery of the Franciscan brotherhood. A trivial 
thing, the discourtesy of a peasant, was the occasion of the 
brethren leaving it. One day when they were at prayer, a 
peasant, driving an ass, came to the shelter. He was evidently 
annoyed to find it already occupied and in some sort of pos 
session, and this aroused his anger and induced him to assert 
his right to enter in with ostentatious incivility. In a loud 
voice he urged his beast : " get you in ; here we will make 
ourselves a cosy dwelling " ; and so he went on addressing 
to the ass the taunts of usurped ownership and easy living, 

1 II Celano, 20 ; Leg. Maj. n. 8 ; 3 Soc. 56. 



106 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSIST 

which were meant for the ears of the brethren. The dis 
courtesy of the man s speech cut Francis to the quick ; he 
felt it for his brethren s sake, for willingly though these men 
endured personal injury they were yet sensitive to the injury 
done to another. 1 Moreover, as he thought the matter over, 
he was troubled at the insinuated disloyalty to his Lady 
Poverty, and again, at the disturbance such intrusion must 
cause to the meditations of the brethren : and he ever had a 
feeling of delicacy about intruding between God and the soul 
in moments of prayer. So without further delay, he bade the 
brethren leave the shelter and seek with him a resting-place 
elsewhere. With something of his old wit, he remarked : 
" God has not called us to prepare a stable for an ass and to 
entertain every passer-by, but to preach the way of salvation 
and give ourselves to prayer ". 2 

But the difficulty now was where to go ? With his habit 
ual deference to the Bishop of Assisi, Francis first went to 
him and asked for the use of some chapel where the brethren 
might without disturbance make their prayer ; but the bishop 
had no chapel to put at their disposal. Next he went to the 
canons of the Cathedral, but received the same reply. Finally 
he sought out the abbot of the monastery on Monte Subasio, 
who at once offered him the chapel of the Porziuncola. But 
the abbot made one condition : should the fraternity increase 
and grow into a great order, the Porziuncola chapel must 
always be regarded as the chief place of the order. Francis 
readily acquiesced ; and to his chivalrous soul it seemed to him 
that this condition placed the fraternity in perpetual fealty 
to the Mother of God "the head, after her Son, of all the 
Saints". 3 

So the brethren went to the Porziuncola, and around the 

i Of. 3 Soc. 42. 

2 3 Soc. 55; I Celano, 44. 

3 IICelano, 18; 3 Soc. 56; Spec. Perfect, cap. 55. That the Porziun 
cola was only given to Francis for the use of the brethren and not as a real 
possession, is proved by the bull of Innocent IV, dated 11 March, 1244, in 
which amongst other properties of the Abbey of Monte Subasio, is mentioned 
the chapel of the Porziuncola. Of. P. Sabatier, Spec. Perfect. Etude Speciale 
du cJiapitre 55, p. 269. 



THE PORZIUNCOLA 107 

chapel they built narrow huts of branches of trees and earth, 1 
such as a traveller might build for a temporary rest on a 
journey : for Francis was insistent that even here, where 
in God s Providence the fraternity would abide for all time, 
their abode should have no character of a permanent dwell 
ing, so that the brethren might be ready at any moment to 
go forth should God call them. It was some years before a 
house was built at the Porziuncola, and then it was built by 
the citizens of Assisi against the will of Francis. 2 And lest 
the brethren should at any time come to regard the chapel as 
their own or claim a proprietorship in the land, Francis made 
a law that every year they should, by way of rent, take a basket 
of fish caught in the river, to the abbot of Monte Subasio : 
and for many years this was done until the great abbey was 
destroyed. And in his courtesy the abbot would send back a 
flask of oil as a receipt. 3 

In the century after Francis death, a delightful story was 
told as to how the brethren came by this gift of the Porziun 
cola. A devout rustic, it runs, standing one day near the 
chapel of our Lady heard the angels singing within, and full 
of wonderment he ran and told the priest who served the 
chapel, and ended by asking : Why do you not ask Brother 
Francis and the brothers who live at Rivo-Torto to go and 
dwell there ? The priest acted on the suggestion and went and 
brought Francis to the spot. No sooner did Francis enter 
the chapel than he beheld in vision Christ and His Blessed 
Mother ; and he boldly asked our Lord whence He had come. 
Our Lord answered: "I am come from beyond the sea". 4 
"Wherefore?" asked Francis again; and again our Lord 
answered: "To espouse this place to Myself". Francis 
coming to himself exclaimed : " I will never leave this spot ". 
And he went straightway and besought the abbot to give 

1 Of. Spec. Perfect, capp. 9, 10. 2 Vide infra, p. 225. 

3 Spec. Perfect, cap. 55. The abbey was destroyed in 1399. But the 
custom of sending annually a basket of fish to the Benedictines, has recently 
been revived ; the fish being now sent to the monks of San Pietro in Assisi, where 
the monks of Monte Subasio took refuge after the destruction of their abbey. 

4 Evidently a reference to the traditional origin of the chapel. Vide 
supra, p. 45. 



108 LIFE OF ST. FEANCIS OF ASSIST 

him this place. 1 The story is true at least to the spirit of 
the Porziuncola and to that singular affection and rever 
ence in which Francis held it. For to him it was in very 
truth a place wedded to Christ and his glorious Mother ; 2 and 
within its walls the angels sang to him and heaven revealed 
its secrets. 

Francis delight in settling at this woodland chapel can be 
compared only to that of a bridegroom bringing his bride to 
the home of her choice. The very name was a joy to him ; 
he thought it must have been given to this spot in anticipa 
tion of the coming of the Lady Poverty. 3 With a fond re 
verence he was solicitous to make this place a mirror of the 
perfection of the life to which the brethren were called. He 
set it about with a hedge within which no secular person 
might set foot, so that no word other than that concern 
ing spiritual things might be uttered there. Within that 
enclosure even the brethren might not speak save of God 
and their soul s welfare. 

No idleness was tolerated there ; when the brethren were 
not at prayer they were at work ; each must have some craft 
to which he could turn when not employed in spiritual exer 
cises. 4 Day and night they kept up the service of prayer. 
At first, having no books from which to read the canonical 
office, they recited instead the Pater Noster at each of the 
liturgical hours. 

The domestic ordering of the fraternity too was in ac 
cordance with the spirit of Poverty : it was based upon 
mutual service and brotherly love. 5 Where all were ready to 

1 Bartholi, Tractatus de Indulgentia S. M. de Portiuncula, cap. i. 

2 Cf. Spec. Perfect, cap. 55: "licet enim locus iste sit sanctus et prcelectus 
a Christo et a Virgine gloriosa". 

3 Cf. Spec. Perfect, cap. 55 ; II Celano, 18. 

4 Thus Francis carved wooden vessels, probably for the use of the 
brethren (of. II Celano, 97) ; in later years he made wafers for sacra 
mental use. At Greccio they still preserve the iron mould he had for this 
purpose. Brother Giles was an adept in making baskets (of. Conformit. in 
Anal. Franc, iv. p. 206). Brother Juniper carried about an awl for mending 
sandals (ibid. p. 245). 

5 Cf. Begula Prima, cap. v. : Per caritatem spiritus voluntarie serviant et 
obediant invicem. Et hcec est vera et sancta obedientia Domini nostri Jesu Christi. 



THE POEZIUNCOLA 109 

put aside themselves and their own will and to make them 
selves servants to each other, and where all were animated 
by the same spirit and ideal, authority, as it is generally 
understood, was hardly needed. Francis idea of authority 
was that of leadership in the harder paths of the vocation and 
of service and solicitude for the needs of those who depended 
upon him : and this was the idea he impressed upon the 
brethren. In the ordinary administration of the daily life of 
the brethren he would seldom exercise the authority given 
him by the Holy See ; but he had chosen another who was 
held not so much as a superior but as a mother of the house 
hold, and whose duty it was to care for the temporal needs of 
the brethren, to shield them against the intrusions of the outer 
world which might be a distraction to their spirit of prayer, and 
to set to each his particular office in the common life. But 
Francis took care that each brother should have periods when 
he might give himself uninterruptedly to the cultivation of the 
spirit in seclusion and prayer whilst the active duties were 
performed by others. 1 

For their daily bread, of course, they went out to work or 
beg. They refused no work which was not unbecoming the 
unworldliness of their character nor in opposition to their 
conscience. They did work in the fields, helping the farm 
hands to gather in the harvests or cultivate the soil ; they 
even worked as servants in the houses of the citizens : always, 
however, doing the menial labour and never accepting any 
post of authority. 2 When the day s work was finished they 
returned to the Porziuncola, bringing with them the food 
they had earned, which went towards the common meal. 
But when work was not to be had, or when their employers 

1 This method of government was long maintained in its primitive sim 
plicity in the hermitages of the Order, after the establishment of a more formal 
government in the convents or larger community houses : as is evident from 
the Rule which Francis later on gave for those living in hermitages. Cf. 
De religiosa habitatione in Eremo, in Opuscula (Quaracchi), pp. 83-4. 

When later on more formal superiors were established, Francis still en 
deavoured to keep alive this idea of service as the essential characteristic of 
the superior in the fraternity : he would have superiors styled " ministers," 
not priors. Cf. Eegula Prima, cap. vi. 

2 Cf . Eegula Prima, cap. vn. ; I Celano, 39-40. 



110 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSISI 

treated them scurvily and sent them home unrewarded, then 
they must needs go from door to door and beg. 1 

Such was the life with which Francis adorned the Porzi- 
uncola that his Lady Poverty might find there an abiding 
dwelling-place and set the law of her spirit to the fraternity 
in all the time to come. And it was here that the new 
postulants were to receive their first instruction in the life 
and duties of the brotherhood. There was no formal period 
of probation for novices at this time, as there came to be 
later on. When anyone sought admission to the fraternity 
he was brought to Francis and submitted to his scrutiny. If 
the postulant showed signs of a vocation he was given the 
habit and received to profession. But first he was obliged to 
give whatever property he possessed to the poor. It was 
not enough that he left it in the hands of his relatives. These 
knights of Poverty were set by God to establish a new order 
of things in the world in conformity with the wisdom of the 
Gospel of Christ. They were not to establish their families 
in wealth and thereby pander to their vanity, but they were 
to teach the world by example the beauty of universal love 
and pity. They who were in need had a first claim upon 
their property according to the charity of Christ ; and to 
deny them this charity was in the eyes of Francis to cheat 
Christ Himself of His heritage. Only when their relatives 
themselves were in want, might the postulants leave them 
their goods. It happened on one occasion that a postulant 
came to seek admittance into the brotherhood and was bidden 
in the usual course to go first and distribute his goods to the 
poor. He went back and renounced his possessions, but in 
favour of his family. Then he returned and told Francis 
what he had done ; but Francis laughed and bade him go 
back again to the family he had enriched : " You have given 
what is yours to your brethren according to the flesh and 
have defrauded the poor. You are not worthy to be reckoned 
amongst God s poor. Go your way." 2 

But amongst all the neighbourly services which Francis 
inculcated upon the brethren, the service of the lepers was 

1 Of. Testamentum S. Franc. 2 II Celano, 81. 



THE POKZIUNCOLA 111 

the most insistent. In his courteous way he used to speak of 
them not as " the lepers " but as " my brother-Christians ". 
And the brethren entered into his compassionate regard for 
them with enthusiasm. It was perhaps the portion of their 
service for others which they liked most, once they had over 
come their dread of its loathsomeness. The lepers helpless 
ness and abandonment appealed strongly to their chivalry. 
Sometimes indeed their compassion outran their discretion. 
There was a brother, James the Simple they called him, who 
was given the care of a leper who was in the last stages of 
the terrible disease, and so loathsome to look upon, that he 
was not permitted to leave the hospital. The pitying brother 
fretted that his charge should be so utterly denied his freedom 
and the society of men, and one day brought him to the 
Porziuncola to see the brethren. Francis was away when 
the leper arrived, and finding him there on his return, he 
at once said to Brother James in the presence of the leper : 
" you must not lead these brother- Christians abroad in this 
fashion; it is not decent, neither for you nor for them". 
But no sooner had he uttered the words than he was filled 
with pity and remorse because of the presence of the leper. 
Straightway he went and threw himself upon his knees before 
Peter Cathanii, who was then the " mother" of the com 
munity, and accused himself of his lack of thought for the 
leper s feelings, and ended by saying : " Confirm unto me the 
penance I wish to perform . Brother Peter replied : What 
ever it will please thee to do, that do ". " This then is my 
penance," said Francis, "I will eat out of the same dish 
with my brother-Christian." And at the meal which followed, 
Francis and the leper sat side by side and ate out of the 
same dish. 1 

Perhaps the most difficult lesson the novice had to learn 

1 Spec. Perfect, ed. Sabatier, cap. 58 ; ed. Leramens, xxxn. In the former 
edition Peter Cathanii is described as Minister General ; but in Lemmens 
edition, it is simply said that Peter was present, without giving him any title. 
As Peter never was Minister General, it is evident that Sabatier s edition in 
this chapter is a later and less reliable version. The probability is that Peter 
was fulfilling the office of superior or " mother," since Francis went to him to 
confirm his penance. 



112 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

was that of begging his bread : and it seems that before re 
ceiving the novices to profession they were first tried in this 
exercise as well as in others. For there was one novice who, 
as the legend bluntly puts it, " did hardly pray at all and 
never did work, neither would he go forth for alms ; but he 
did eat bravely ". Francis dealt with him somewhat caustic 
ally : " Go your way, Brother Fly, since you are willing to 
eat the sweat of the other brethren but yourself are idle in 
the work of the Lord. Like a barren drone you gain nothing 
and do not work, but you devour the labour and gains of the 
good bees " : l and so he dismissed him. 

Yet was Francis always compassionate for the beginners 
who were sent out to beg ; for he himself knew the mortifica 
tion of it. To encourage them he would himself go out first 
on the quest for alms. He deemed it no sign of a worldly 
spirit when a young brother felt shame in begging, but only 
when for shame they refused to beg. 2 

He himself had now come, from frequent meditation on 
the poverty of Jesus Christ, to hold it as a privilege to live 
by alms : and more especially by alms won on the quest from 
door to door. Such alms he considered more honourable to 
poverty than those offered spontaneously, because they were 
won by a greater exercise of humility. 3 

But for the younger brethren this begging from door to 
door was an undoubted trial of their vocation. One day a 
brother who had been sent out to beg perhaps one of the 
shy ones who had need to summon his courage to his aid 
came back carrying his wallet filled with food, over his 
shoulder, and as he came along he sang aloud. Francis 
hearing his voice at once went out to meet him, and taking 
the wallet, embraced the brother and kissed the shoulder over 
which the wallet had lain. "Blessed be my brother," he 
exclaimed, " who goes forth promptly, quests humbly, and 
comes back merrily." 

1 Spec. Perfect, cap. 24 ; II Celano, 45. 2 II Celano, 71. 3 Ibid. 

4 II Celano, 76; cf. Spec. Perfect, cap. 25. The evidence of all the early 
legends is too clear to admit any doubt upon the fact that the Friars Minor in 
the primitive days went begging when other means of subsistence failed them. 



THE POEZIUNCOLA 113 

To encourage the brethren, Francis often discoursed to 
them of the poverty of our Lord. " My brothers most be 
loved," he said to them once, "the Son of God was more 
noble than any of us ; yet for our sakes He made Himself 
poor in this world. For love of Him we have chosen this 
way of poverty, wherefore we ought not to be ashamed to go 
begging. To be ashamed of the pledge of our heavenly herit 
age does not become us who are heirs of the kingdom. I 
tell you that many noble and wise men will come and join 
our brotherhood, who will take it as an honour to go out and 
beg. You, therefore, who are the first-fruits of the brethren, 
should rejoice and be glad and not be unwilling to do what 
you must hand down to these saints to come." 1 

Eventually by his example and fervent exhortations, 
Francis so far overcame the repugnance of the brethren that 
the questors, each returning from his own quarter of the city 
on a day they had been sent out to beg, would lay out their 
alms in mock rivalry contending as to who had proved him 
self the best beggar. 2 

They were, however, on no account allowed to receive 
money, even if it were freely offered them. Upon this point 
Francis was absolutely decided. Only in rare cases when 
the sick were in sore need, and in no other way could be re 
lieved, did he allow the brethren to accept money at all ; 3 
and even that exception he made reluctantly. For to his 
mind money was the symbol of that world from which 

Yet two contemporary witnesses outside the Order state that the first Francis 
cans did not beg. Burkhardt in his Chronicle (Mon. Germ. Hist. Scriptores, 
torn, xxiii. p.>376) says: " Pauper es Minores . . . neqiie pecuniam nee quic- 
quam aliud prater victum accipiebant et siquandovcstcm necessariam quispicuu 
ipsis spoiite conferebat, ium enim quicquam pcterent ab aliquo ". And Jacques 
de Vitry in his well-known letter (cf. P. Sabatier, Spec. Perfect, p. 300) says 
of the Poor Clares : " Nihil accipiunt sed de labore manuum vivunt ". The 
explanation is probably that the friars only begged in cases of necessity and 
without making themselves a nuisance to others. This explanation would 
also give another reason for St. Francis special delight in alms gained by 
questing, as they would then be a token of a greater poverty and destitution. 

1 II Celano, 74 ; Spec. Perfect, cap. 18. 

2 Spec. Perfect, cap. 18. 

J This exception was retained in the Regula Prima of 1221, cap. vm. ; but 
is not mentioned in the Rule of 1223. 

8 



114 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

Poverty had set the brethren free, the world of barter and 
gain, of avarice and usury and of the hatreds which rose 
therefrom. It was, moreover, as he saw it, a sort of charter 
of possession in the things of the earth ; it gave a man a lien 
upon and in some way bound him up with the material world. 
The man who has money, holds the earth in bondage ; his 
money thrusts him between God and God s creatures, and too 
often he prostitutes the earth which is God s to his own 
selfish pleasure : and that to Francis was an unholy thing. 
" The earth is the Lord s," expressed, in a very intimate 
phrase, the faith of Francis concerning the use man should 
make of the visible creation ; and whatever tended to blur 
that faith he abhorred with all the passionate sincerity of his 
nature. It was not that he had any theories against the right 
of private property : in fact he accepted that right so far as 
it concerned others who were not of his fraternity : that was 
their concern and the concern of the Church. But he grieved 
over the abuse of the right ; and in his dealings with men of 
the world who sought his counsel, he always insisted that 
their property was a trust put into their hands by the pro 
vidence of God, not for their own benefit alone but for the 
benefit of all who were in need. But for himself and the 
brethren he held that God had set them free from this trust 
in order that they might more convincingly by word and ex 
ample warn the world against the dangers and lust of wealth. 
The very existence of the brotherhood dependent upon the 
good-will of men for their bodily sustenance, would be a con 
tinual reproach to the avaricious, and an invitation to those 
who held this world s goods to fulfil their trust in relieving 
the needs of the poor. 

Hence in sending the brethren out to beg he would say 
to them: "Go forth; for in this last hour the Friars Minor 
have been placed in the world that the elect may fulfil those 
things for which ,the Great Judge will commend them, say 
ing : what you did to these My lesser brethren you did unto 
Me ." l So long then as men of the world held their goods 
in the spirit of a trust and in charity towards their fellow- 
ill Celano, 71. Of. Matt. xxv. 40. 



THE POBZIUNCOLA 115 

men, he found no fault with them: his protest was against 
the greed and avarice which he saw festering in the whole 
body politic of his day : and of that greed and avarice, money, 
in his eyes, was the token. In those times money was not 
the general means of barter for common daily needs, as it has 
become since. In the simpler arrangement of society a 
labourer s wages were more generally paid in food and the 
ordinary necessaries of life : money represented not so much 
his present need as his future store ; in a large measure it 
was the expression of a superfluity. As such it was apt to 
breed artificial wants and materialize the whole man : a danger 
which indeed seems inherent in money at all times, but which 
in those simpler days was the more apparent. Francis had 
himself experienced the danger ; he had known the fascina 
tion of comfort and luxurious living which grows upon a man 
to the dimming of his spiritual sight when the road to 
luxuries is opened by a ready purse. He knew too by ob 
servation of the world in which he had lived, the brutal arrog 
ance and love of power which money is apt to breed in those 
who have it. And all these things made him regard money 
as a peculiarly unholy possession which not only clogged 
the soul in its more spiritual movements, but tended to de 
humanize both heart and mind : hence the disdain and almost 
virulent reproach with which he came to regard it. Francis, 
as you must have seen already, was not of the race of 
philosophers who stand aloof and take the world as a mere 
mental problem. His philosophy was all bound up with his 
own vocation and duty ; he was consecrated to free the world 
from the tyranny of the greed and avarice of wealth ; and 
as money was the actual weapon with which this tyranny 
prosecuted its reign he held it as de facto the devil s snare. 
One must understand that in order to understand Francis 
and why he would not allow the brotherhood even to touch 
the unholy thing. Thus one day a visitor to the chapel of 
the Porziuncola, left behind him on the altar a coin. A 
brother finding it there, took and threw it into a chest near 
the window ; not, it would seem from the legend, altogether 
in contempt but with an eye upon future use. Francis, 

8* 



116 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSISI 

hearing what he had done, was much angered, and the 
brother in alarm threw himself upon his knees before him 
"offering himself even to stripes". It was seldom that 
Francis uttered a harsh word, but now he " chided right 
bitterly ". As a penance he bade the brother go and take up 
the money in his mouth, as beasts do, and carry it in this 
fashion outside the enclosure of the Porziuncola and cast it 
on a dung-heap. 1 

The brethren came to feel with him in this matter of 
money and to have the same unreasoning reason ; as was 
shown in the case of a young brother who thought to mock 
at the solemn conviction of an elder. They were going one 
day to the leper hospital when they came across a piece of 
money lying in the road. The elder would have] passed on 
unheeding, but the younger picked it up and said it would 
be of use in assisting some poor leper : but he said this not 
so much out of compassion for the leper as in derision of the 
other s scruple. But hardly had he touched the coin when 
he remembered Francis warnings and presently he was struck 
with a great fear and began to tremble violently. He tried 
to speak, but was tongue-tied with fear; and it seemed to 
him that the piece of money was nothing else than an evil 
genius. With a great effort he at length cast it from him 
and the spell was broken. Then in great contrition he knelt 
before his companion and begged pardon, and recovered his 
peace. 2 

But perhaps the most marvellous thing about the Porziun 
cola was the simplicity of spirit of the men who gathered 
there. In that holy place it was as though one had come 
into an atmosphere of absolute truthfulness where no guile 
or conceit could continue to live. The brethren constantly 
strove to know themselves as they were and to appear before 
men for what they were. There was with them no pious 
dissimulation such as is sometimes justified by religious 
people on the plea of edifying their neighbour. In fact, so 
far wers they from seeking to edify by deceit that they had an 
almost exaggerated anxiety that people should know their 
1 1 Celano, 56; Spec. Perfect, cap. 15. 2 II Celano, 66. 



THE POKZIUNCOLA 117 

weaknesses and faults, especially after men began to respect 
them as saints. Thus once when Francis was sick he was 
persuaded by the brothers to eat of some fowl they had pro 
cured for him. Afterwards, however, he feared that he had 
been too self-indulgent, and knowing that the citizens esteemed 
him a man of austere life, he was struck with remorse. 
Taking a brother he went into the city. At the city s 
gate he took his cord and put it around his neck and bade 
his companion lead him by the cord through the streets in 
the way that criminals are led, meanwhile crying aloud : " Be 
hold a glutton who fattens on fine fowl whilst you think him 
to be fasting". 1 

Any unwonted show of reverence towards the brethren 
filled them with alarm or repugnance. Thus one brother 
when sent to establish a house in Bologna, came hastily 
back to the Porziuncola because the people in that city treated 
him as a saint ; 2 and another, when met at the gates of 
Kome, by a procession of worthy folk who came out to do 
him reverence, turned aside and joined some children in a 
game of see-saw, until the waiting worthies turned back in 
disgust. 3 Not uncommonly in preaching they would confess 
openly their own sins lest people should take them to be as 
holy as the doctrine they preached, or because in their simple 
sincerity they desired the prayers of the people for their own 
salvation. Amongst themselves if one happened even to think 
injuriously of another, he would afterwards confess his thought 
and beg the other s pardon. 4 

So utterly guileless were they, that they could not credit 
that others were not as truthful as themselves in word or 
action. They believed the best of all men and were not easily 
brought to think evil of any. Thus there was a secular priest 
to whom some of them were accustomed to go to confession. 
He was unhappily a man of ill-fame ; but the brethren could 

1 1 Celano, 52. 2 Actus S. Franc, cap. 4 ; Fioretti, cap. 4. 

3 Fioretti, Vita di Frate Ginepro, cap. 9. 

4 1 Celano, 56 ; 3 Soc. 43. See also what Eccleston says of the truth 
fulness which characterized the English friars, in De adventu, ed. Little, 
col. v. p. 30. 



118 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

not be got to believe him other than he appeared, nor would 
they leave off making their confessions to him. 1 

But this was perhaps partly out of their reverence for 
the priestly office. In every priest they saw only the priestly 
dignity in which was reflected the majesty of Christ, and with 
all reverence they would kiss the hand which had held the 
Body of Christ in the Blessed Sacrament of the altar. 2 They 
were not given to sitting in judgment upon any man : they 
were too conscious of their own defects in the sight of the 
holiness of God easily to find fault with the personal conduct 
of others : they kept an open eye only for the good in men s 
actions, which they took gratefully as food for their own souls. 
But the word of a priest was to them almost as the law of 
God, such was their reverence for him. Thus once when a 
priest said to a brother: "Beware of hypocrisy, brother," 
the brother was much troubled, thinking that the priest 
had detected in him a hypocrite. Some other brothers en 
deavoured to console him, but he replied : " A priest cannot 
lie". 3 

Thus were the brethren trained in the wisdom of Poverty ; 
and the Porziuncola came to stand in the eyes of men as the 
home of a new peace. To some it seemed as though the 
radiance of Bethlehem and Nazareth had again broken 
through the clouds which encompassed the world and was 
flooding the plain below Assisi with a clear and joy-giving 
light. 

1 1 Celano, 46. 

" CL Testamentum S. Franc. : Nolo in ipsis consider ar e peccatum" etc. 
3 1 Celano, 46; cf. Vita Fr. Mgidii in Chron. xxiv. Gen.; Anal. Franc. 
in. p. 79. 



CHAPTEE III. 
THE PORZIUNCOLA (CONTINUED). 

THEY were heroic days, those first years at the Porziuncola ; 
and the men who were formed there at that period were more 
or less of the heroic type ; at least as a body. In those days 
the brethren had no doubt or hesitation as to the wisdom of 
their life. Francis word was their law; and as yet the 
difficulties and problems of a world-development had not 
come to disturb the harmony of the fraternity. Their thoughts 
were borne upon the wings of their spiritual desire far above 
the earth. The world s prudence and its conventions were 
nothing to them, not that they defied the world on its own 
ground but simply because they moved in another sphere of 
thought where these things have no part. No man could 
claim a place in the ordinary economy of the world and yet 
act as they acted. It was an evidence of the inherent 
idealism of the Church that their life was approved at all. 
We shall see later on what difficulties arose when it became 
necessary to bring the fraternity into some sort of relationship 
with the established traditions and the wider policy of the 
Holy See. But these difficulties had not yet arisen and the 
brethren of the Porziuncola were still living in undisturbed 
liberty of soul. The world looked on and wondered. At one 
moment it might revile the brotherhood as an outrage upon 
the conventions and their wisdom ; the next moment it was 
on its knees begging pardon, being won by some subtle grace 
it could not long withstand. 

What, for example, could the world make of a man like 
Brother Juniper ? Yet it respected and loved him in spite 
of itself. This Brother Juniper was one of the types bred at 
the Porziuncola, if one may speak of types in a community 

119 



120 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSISI 

where every member retained a remarkable freshness and in 
dividuality of character. But he was typical of a certain 
childlike naivete which came in a greater or lesser degree to 
all the brethren in their new vocation. In some it was com 
bined with a shrewd knowledge of the world or with a native 
dignity of bearing or with a high natural intelligence : but all 
in some measure were endowed with it. They all had some 
thing of the open-eyed wonder and the intentness on the 
present moment which is characteristic of early youth. 

Brother Juniper himself was naturally of a naive disposi 
tion and a man in whom warm feeling was more potent than 
calm reason. He was impulsive and given to acting upon 
the idea of the moment ; but he was utterly without a 
thought of self. He would have died smiling and unconsci 
ous of personal merit, for the sake of saving another man pain 
or to bear witness to the faith which was in him : and for this 
reason Francis esteemed him a very flower of the fraternity. 
" Would that I had a forest of such junipers ! " he once ex 
claimed when Juniper had perpetrated some gaucherie. His 
very indiscretions were redeemed by his absolute sincerity 
and selflessness ; so that the old chronicler dwells delightedly 
upon his story as one who would say : " See what a simpleton 
he is and yet we love and worship him ". Who in fact could 
fail to love a man who, being somewhat intemperately re 
proved by his superior, is wholly unconcerned about his own 
humiliation but much concerned because the superior, in re 
proving him, had developed a sore throat ? That happened 
in Juniper s case after the death of Francis, and the superior 
was one who did not appreciate simplicity as Francis did. 
On the evening of his reproof Juniper went into the city and 
obtained the materials for a good pottage of flour and butter. 
When the night was well advanced there was a knock at the 
superior s door, and, on the door being opened, there stood 
Juniper with a candle in one hand and the steaming pottage 
in the other. " My father," he said, " when thou didst re 
prove me for my fault, I saw that thy voice grew hoarse and 
I ween it was through overmuch fatigue. Therefore I 
thought of a remedy and made this mess of pottage for thee." 



THE PORZIUNCOLA 121 

The superior was only the more angered at being disturbed 
and bade him begone. Juniper, however, was full of pity 
and still stood there endeavouring to persuade the superior 
to eat the pottage ; but without avail. At length, seeing that 
the superior would not eat, Juniper said : " Then if you will 
not eat, my father, I pray thee do this for me : hold the candle 
and I myself will eat it". The chronicler adds that the 
superior " being won by Brother Juniper s piety and simplicity, 
was no more wroth, but sat down and ate with him ". Much 
the same thing happened frequently as between the brothers 
of the Porziuncola and the outer world : men might criticize 
this or that action, but the spirit in which it was done, made 
them captive. It was this Brother Juniper who played see 
saw with the children outside the walls of Rome whilst the 
procession of people waited impatiently to do him honour. 
Another lesson, learned at the Porziuncola, Juniper carried 
out to the letter, namely, that of never refusing an alms to 
the poor, if there was aught to give. In after years when the 
brethren had convents built for them, Juniper could never 
be taught that the books and the furniture of the convent 
must not be given away. He so frequently gave away his 
own clothing that the superiors at length strictly forbade him 
to part with his tunic, however poor a beggar might be. One 
day after this, meeting a beggar on the road and having 
nothing to give, Juniper said to him : " My superior has for 
bidden me to give away my tunic, but if you take it from 
me, I will not say thee nay " ; and the beggar straightway 
stripped him of his tunic. 

In which matter of intemperate giving, as some would 
call it, Juniper had a compeer in Francis himself. For once 
at the Porziuncola, when a poor woman came there begging, 
and there was nothing else to give her of any value, Francis 
gave the only book of the Gospels the brothers had. 

Yet another incident in Juniper s story must we relate, as 
witnessing to the Porziuncola spirit. In his later days he had 
as a companion a brother of kindred disposition to his own, 
a Brother Amazialbene, whom he loved very dearly because 
of his admirable patience and obedience. Now, says the 



122 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSIST 

chronicler, Brother Amazialbene died, and Juniper, hearing 
of his death, felt such sorrow as he had never felt in all his 
life before. In his great bitterness of sorrow, he cried out : 
" "Woe is me ! wretched man that I am, for now is no good 
thing left to me, and the world is undone through the death 
of my sweet and dearest brother Amazialbene ! " Pondering 
upon his loss, he said : " If it were not that I should not be 
able to have peace with the brothers, I would go to his grave 
and take up his head, and out of his head I would make two 
porringers ; one of which I would always eat out of, in 
memory of him and for my devotion s sake ; and out of the 
other I would drink whenever I was thirsty and wished to 
drink ". 

Such was Juniper, one of Francis paladins ; but whom 
the Lady Clare, who held him in high reverence, aptly styled : 
" The play thing of God". 1 

Another typical knight of this company of Poverty was 
Brother Masseo, whom Francis held as a true Friar Minor 
because of his " gracious aspect and natural good sense and 
his fair and devout eloquence " ; a different character, as you 
see at once, from the artless Juniper. Francis would often 
take Masseo with him on his journeys because when Francis 
himself was inclined to keep silence and to pray, Masseo 
would hold the people apart and preach to them ; and since 
he was of handsome appearance and ready speech, people 
listened to him willingly. He was a singular combination of 
practical common sense and docile humility. 

On one occasion master and disciple were on a journey 
and they came to cross-roads, one leading to Florence, an 
other to Arezzo and a third to Siena. Masseo, who was 
walking ahead because Francis wished to be alone to pray, 
on coming to the cross-roads stopped and called back : 
Father, by which way are we to go?" "By that which 
God shall will," came the reply. " But how can we know 
the will of God?" asked Masseo. Francis answered : "By 

1 Concerning Bro. Juniper, vide Vita Fr. Juniperi, in Chron. xxiv. Gen., 
Anal. Franc, in. pp. 54-65 ; Fioretti, Vita di Prate Ginepro ; De ConformU. in 
Anal. Franc, iv. pp. 245-48 et passim. 



THE POEZIUNCOLA 123 

the sign I will show thee. Wherefore by the merit of holy 
obedience, I command thee that in the cross-road where 
thou art now standing, thou turn round and round as chil 
dren do and cease not turning till I tell thee." Masseo did 
as he was told, whilst Francis prayed to be led as God willed. 
Suddenly Francis cried out : " Stand still and tell me towards 
what quarter thy face is now turned ". Masseo replied : 
"Towards Siena". "That is the way," replied Francis, 
"God would have us go." So they resumed their journey, 
Masseo going ahead as before, but wondering in his own 
mind why Francis had made him play the child before the 
folk who were passing by. They came to Siena and were 
lodged in the bishop s house. There was a feud raging in 
the city at the time, and no sooner had Frarjcis heard of it 
than he went out into the city and preached to the people, 
beseeching them for the love of God, to have peace amongst 
themselves ; and at his pleading the citizens put aside their 
quarrel and made peace with each other. On their return to 
the bishop s house the friars were received with great honour. 

But Francis humility took fright at so much respect, and 
early the next morning he woke up Masseo and, without a 
word to anyone, stole out of the house and went his way. 
As they went along Masseo was much troubled at what 
seemed to him a lack of discretion and courtesy on Francis 
part, and his mind rebelled against the way Francis had 
treated him on the previous day at the cross-roads also 
against this discourtesy to the bishop ; till suddenly he began 
to recall the wonder Francis had worked by his preaching in 
the city : and at that he was filled with remorse, and said 
to himself : " If an angel of heaven had wrought such 
wonders as did Brother Francis yesterday, it had not been 
more marvellous ; wherefore if he had bidden me throw 
stones I should have done it and obeyed, for the good ending 
of that journey shows that what he does proceeds from the 
working of God ". 

However in spite of the occasional murmurings of his 
" natural good sense," Masseo was profoundly simple and 
humble. He might not always be able to square Francis 



124 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSISI 

proceedings with common prudence, yet he felt that Francis 
was nearer to God than most men and therefore he gave him 
a childlike obedience. That was the way at the Porziuncola. 
The brethren were convinced that God was working His 
Will amongst them on new and mysterious lines and that 
Francis was raised up to lead them in these ways : and that 
was why his word was their law. 

Brother Masseo it was who once edified the brotherhood 
by a notable example of humility ; for being a man of good 
natural parts, humility perhaps shone all the more brightly 
in him. One day Francis said to Masseo before all the 
brethren : " Brother Masseo, all these thy companions have 
the grace of contemplation and prayer ; but thou hast the 
grace of preaching the word of God for the satisfying of the 
people ; wherefore that they may be able to give themselves 
to contemplation, I will that thou perform the offices of the 
door and of almsgiving and of the kitchen ; and when the other 
brothers eat, thou shalt eat outside the gate, so that when 
people come thou mayest satisfy them with good words of 
God". 

For some days Masseo performed these offices, making 
himself the servant of the household. But the other brothers, 
feeling the humiliation to which he was put, besought Fran 
cis to allow them all to share the labour of the place. Francis 
thereupon called Masseo and told him that in consideration for 
the request of the other brothers, he relieved him of his duties. 
But Masseo answered : " Father, whatever thou dost lay on 
me, whether wholly or in part, I deem it altogether God s 
deed ". At this Francis was glad and he preached to all the 
brothers a sermon on humility which greatly moved their 
hearts. 

One of the recorded sayings of Brother Masseo is this. 
Seeing that some of the brothers were bent on making pil 
grimages to the shrines of the saints, Masseo remarked that 
he thought it better and more useful to visit living saints than 
dead ones. For, said he, in the living saints one learns the 
dangers and temptations they have to beware of and fight 
against. 



THE POKZIUNCOLA 125 

On another occasion he composed a chant which he con 
stantly sang. The brothers hearing the chant so frequently, 
asked him why he did not vary his song. He replied : " Be 
cause when a man has found a good thing, he ought not to 
change it ".* 

Very different in character from the ever-ready Masseo 
was Brother Kuffino of the family of the Scefi of Assisi : a 
timid and shy man, silent and reserved and at times apt to 
be morose : hardly a man, one would have thought, to enter 
the joyous company of the Porziuncola. Yet beneath his re 
serve there was a great gentleness and an entire sincerity. 
His timidity was the result of a highly-strung nervous tem 
perament. And perhaps, because in the complexity of his 
own character Francis knew something of the self-torture 
and moodiness which come from sensitive nerves, he was 
usually very gentle with Euffino. But in the case of Francis 
there was always a quick rebound from his depressions, a re 
bound which Kuffino lacked. Nevertheless there was a cer 
tain passive strength in this timorous, diffident brother and 
a sincerity of purpose which was in his case the basis of high 
spiritual attainment. Francis was wont to style him in his 
absence, Saint Euffino. One thing Euffino dreaded, and that 
was being sent to preach. If whilst on a journey he was told 
to address the people, he at once became incapable of utter 
ing a word. One day Francis, wishing to cure him of his 
diffidence, commanded him to go to a church in the city and 
preach as the Lord should inspire him. Euffino begged to 
be spared the ordeal, alleging his incapacity, not without a 
certain obstinacy of opinion. Whereat Francis sternly re 
proved his hesitation, and as a penance commanded that he 
should now go to the church, stripped of his habit and clad 
only in his breeches. One can imagine what the command 
meant to Euffino, but he went as he was told. 

The citizens, seeing him go through the streets, thought 
he must be mad, and the boys made sport of him : but Euffino 

1 Concerning Bro. Masseo, cf. Fioretti, capp. xi. xn. etc. ; Chron. xxiv. 
Gen., Vita Fr. Massaei, Anal. Franc, in. pp. 115-21; Spec. Perfect, cap. 85 ; 
De Conformit. in Anal. Franc, iv. pp. 193-7 et passim. 



126 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSIST 

heroically went through with his task and in his nakedness 
came to the church and preached to the people there. No 
sooner, however, had Buffino set out than Francis grew re 
morseful at his own harshness, and in his southern fashion 
thus chided himself : " Son of Pietro Bernardone, thou vile 
mannikin, wherefore didst thou command Brother Buffino, 
one of the noblest citizens of Assisi, thus to go preaching, 
naked ? Please God, thou shalt have experience of what thou 
hast made another to endure " ; and forthwith he stripped 
off his habit and set out for the city, clad only in his breeches. 
But one of the brothers, Leo by name, followed, taking with 
him both the habits of the two naked preachers. 

As Francis entered the church Buffino was addressing 
the people, speaking nervously and with difficulty. He was 
telling them to put away deceit and fraud and to give every 
man his due. Francis waited until the other had finished 
and then himself mounted the pulpit, and preached so con 
vincingly on the poverty and nakedness of Christ that the 
listeners all wept. And as the two brethren left the church, 
now clothed in their habits, the people crowded around to 
touch the hem of their garments. 

Buffino, however, was not always so docile. On one oc 
casion he came to the conclusion that the life of service 
amongst strangers and of preaching was not for him and that 
he would serve God more faithfully if he gave himself to 
prayer in solitude, following the inspiration of his own soul 
and not the leadership of Francis ; nor would he listen to 
what Francis had to say on the matter. He met all persua 
sion by saying that an angel of God had shown him the right 
path. So Francis went aside and began to pray. 

At first Euffino was relieved and elated when Francis 
turned aside, for it seemed to him as though a bright and 
glorious angel stood at his side ; and this he took as an en 
couragement to go his own way. But suddenly the angel 
became an angel of darkness and Euffino was overwhelmed 
with confusion and dread, and running to Francis he fell at 
his feet in a swoon. Francis lifted him up and comforted 
him, saying half playfully, half sadly, " Brother Euffino, 



THE POBZIUNCOLA 127 

thou poor simpleton, tell me now in whom thou didst put 
thy faith ! " And Kuffino drew nearer to Francis in spirit 
and promised to obey. 

So Kumno trod the high-road of Poverty more often in 
fear and hesitation than in gladness. But at the end he 
found his peace. He lived for many years after Francis had 
left the earth; but when he was dying, his spiritual guide 
appeared to him in vision and gave him " a most sweet kiss " ; 
and in the comfort of that embrace Buffino met death joy 
fully. 1 Surely in this brother of the difficult temperament, 
did the spirit of the Porziuncola reveal itself in a mother-love, 
pitiful and patient that mother-love which alone can save 
such souls as that of Kuffino from its latent despair, and 
transform its burden into heroic endurance and ultimate 
peace. 

Of a happier and bolder cast of mind was Brother Giles, 
with whom we are already acquainted, he who followed Ber 
nard da Quintavalle and Peter Cathanii in joining the company. 
In some ways he had the most original character of all the 
disciples: he certainly stands foremost in the group of all 
those who embraced the life of Poverty in the earliest years. 
So confidently did Francis regard him that he would have 
made him a law unto himself in his comings and goings and 
the choice of his dwelling-places, only that Giles would not 
have it so. Unlike Masseo who preferred living saints to the 
dead, Giles, for the first six years of his religious life, was 
given to making pilgrimages, now to this shrine, now to that. 
Thus he visited in turn St. James at Cornpostella, St. Michael 
of Monte Gargano, St. Nicholas of Bari and the Holy Land, 
besides his several visits to the tombs of the Apostles in Kome ; 
and wherever he went he carried with him the message of 
Poverty. He would always, even on his journeys, earn his 
bread by the labour of his hands. On his visit to the Holy 

1 Cf. Fioretti, xxix. xxx. ; Chron. xxiv. Gen., Vita Fr. Rufini, Anal. 
Franc, in. pp. 46-54 ; De Conformit. in Anal. Franc, iv. 197-202 ct passim. 
Ruffino was one of the companions called upon by the Minister General, 
Crescentius, in 1244, to record in writing their recollections of St. Francis. 
Wadding (Annales, ad an. 1210) puts the reception into the Order of Juniper, 
Masseo and Ruilino in 1210. 



128 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

Land, coming to the port of Brindisi, he had to tarry there 
some days, awaiting the sailing of a boat. Giles begged a 
pitcher and went about the town hawking water. At other 
times he made baskets of rushes and sold them for bread ; 
or he would carry the dead to burial, or assist labourers in 
the fields. Once when he was staying in Borne, he went out 
every morning after hearing Mass and gathered faggots in a 
wood, and returning to the city went round selling his bundles. 
But one day when he was returning with his load of wood, 
a woman wished to buy it of him, and a price being fixed 
upon, Giles carried the load to her house. The woman see 
ing that he was a religious, gave him more than she had 
promised, whereat Giles said to her : " Good woman, I would 
not that the vice of greed should overtake me : therefore I 
will take no more than we agreed upon ". In fact he went 
away, leaving half the price behind him with the woman. 
"And at this," adds the chronicler, "the woman was filled 
with exceeding great reverence for him." 

But Giles had a certain sturdy shrewdness and indepen 
dence even in his devotion. One day in the market place of 
Eome a man was calling for a labourer to beat his walnut 
trees. Giles offered himself ; and that evening he might 
have been seen making his way back to the house of the 
brethren, carrying on his back a load of walnuts tied up in 
his habit, which he had stripped off for the purpose. It 
was his wages for the day. In the harvest time he would go 
into the harvest field with other poor people to glean the 
ears which were left by the reapers ; but on these occasions 
he usually gave his gleanings to the other poor : for he would 
not lay up any store beyond the day s need. Even when 
invited to stay in the houses of cardinals or dignitaries, when 
these great men began to court the company of the brethren, 
Giles insisted on going out each day to earn his bread. 

But one day, when he was staying with the Cardinal- 
Bishop of Tusculum in Home and it was raining heavily, 
the cardinal rallied him : " To-day at least you must eat of 
my table ". But he did not know the ingenuity of his guest. 
Giles sought out the kitchen, and finding it unclean, he 



THE POKZIUNCOLA 129 

bargained to clean it up for two loaves. But he always took 
care amidst his incessant labour, to find time for prayer. 

In the sixth year from his coming to the Porziuncola, 
Giles retired to a hermitage near Perugia, and from this time 
he seems to have spent his days in one or other of the her 
mitages associated with his name in the neighbourhood of 
that city, Fabrione, Monte Eipido and Cetona. But he re 
mained true to his principle of earning his bread by the work 
of his hands. Often was his solitude broken into by men 
who came from far and near to gather wisdom from his lips : 
for the fame of his wise sayings had gone abroad : and those 
who heard them would often commit them to writing for a 
better remembrance ; and in after years these writings were 
gathered together under the title : " The Golden Sayings of 
Brother Giles," and in the book in which they are gathered 
they may be read. 1 

Such were some of the men who formed the brotherhood 
in those first days at the Porziuncola. Others there were 
equally worthy of notice, of whom some are already known 
to us in this history, like " the venerable Brother Bernard " ; 
and others there are who will take their places as our story 
proceeds. Notable amongst these is Brother Leo, the pecor- 
ello di Dio," as Francis called him, because of his singular 
purity and simplicity ; a childlike soul, albeit a good scribe and 
useful secretary. Of others again but a passing memory has 
been recorded, though they were men for whose presence on 
this earth the world should be grateful. One such was 
Brother Simon. He spoke so sweetly of the love of God, 
that one who spent a whole night with him conversing on 
this subject, was surprised by the dawn ; for the night had 
passed as though it had been but a few minutes. And 
Brother Simon was, moreover, very compassionate towards 
those who were tempted. 2 

Thus did the Porziuncola gather to itself men of diverse 
character and temperament, and what is more marvellous, 

1 Vide supra, p. 56, note 1. 

1J Of. Fioretti, XL. Wadding (Aimalcs, ad an. 1210) puts the reception into 
the Order of Leo and Simon in 1210. 

9 



130 LIFE OF ST. FRANCIS OF ASSISI 

whilst impressing upon all a generic family likeness, it left 
each man himself, fostering in each his own peculiar strength 
and nobility of spirit, as one cultivates in a fair garden many 
varieties of flowers. There was no moulding in a rigid 
groove : but the spirit of the place seemed to delight in the 
freshness each individual character brought to the riches of 
the whole and to treasure it as part of the secret of its joy. 
Francis indeed had no wish that all the brethren should be 
one external pattern. The true Friar Minor, he would say, 
scanning the perfections of the brotherhood, is Brother 
Bernard with his enduring faith and love of poverty ; Brother 
Leo with his simplicity and purity ; Brother Angelo with his 
fine courtesy ; Brother Masseo with his gracious countenance 
and natural good sense and eloquence ; Brother Giles with 
his gift for contemplation ; Brother Ruffino with his habit of 
continuous prayer ; Brother Juniper with his selflessness ; 
Brother John with his great strength of body and mind ; 
Brother Eoger with his surpassing charity for the souls of 
others ; Brother Lucido who in imitation of our Lord, will 
have no abiding place on the earth. 1 And this largeness of 
spirit was in truth one of the secrets which gave power and 
beauty to that Umbrian revival of faith. 

1 Of. Spec. Perfect, cap. 85. This chapter is evidently a compilation of 
the traditional sayings of St. Francis. 



CHAPTER IV. 

SAINT CLARE. 

IT was in the early spring of 1212 that the Lady Clare left 
her father s house and came to the Porziuncola and there 
vowed herself to Christ and Poverty in the presence of Francis 
and the brethren. 

Some writers of late years have woven around this inci 
dent an air of uncertain romance as of an affection purified 
of grosser earthliness yet nevertheless earthly in its fibre. 
But they who have so written do not know either Francis 
or Clare. The point where their several affections met and 
linked their lives together, was beyond themselves, no other 
than the Lord Christ Himself. Him they both loved with 
a love which admitted of no other love less sacred and 
spiritual. 

And they both loved the Christ in His earthly poverty and 
in His pity for the world ; and in this revelation of the Christ- 
life they both found the full response to their own desire. 
And in this they became as children of one birth ; such an en 
tire sympathy did it create between them, and so intuitive 
an understanding did it give them of each other. 

Even before she knew Francis, Clare had been strangely 
drawn to the poor as to her own people : and when she and 
Francis met it was as two kindred souls recognizing each 
other. Their first meeting probably was during the Lent of 
1212. Francis had then returned from a series of apostolic 
missions in Tuscany and the country around Perugia and was 
again preaching in Assisi. The Assisians were now proud of 
their prophet and wherever he preached the crowds gathered 
to listen. Clare was amongst them. Perhaps she had heard 
him before ; at any rate she would have heard of him. 

131 9 * 



132 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

At this time she was in her eighteenth year. 1 Her family 
was one of the noblest in the territories of Assisi, and besides 
their castle in the country they had a house in the city, but 
a few steps from the church of San Giorgio and from the Ca 
thedral. Clare s father was of opinion that she ought to have 
been married before this ; but whenever he spoke of marriage 
she refused to listen or parried his questions. She had as yet 
no definite idea of the future which lay before her, but there 
was that in her soul which bade her keep her freedom : already 
she was thinking of the life wholly dedicated to Jesus Christ 
in virginal chastity. Even in her early girlhood her world 
had stretched beyond the earth into the realm of religious 
mysteries ; the call of the spirit had drawn her insistently 
apart amidst the ordinary pleasures and interests of her 
young life. Regularly she would withdraw herself from the 
distracting claims which the family life made upon her, and 
retire to some secluded nook and recite the Paters which 
linked her so sweetly with God, her heavenly Father, and all 
the household of the saints. And as she grew in years she 
became more and more as one living expectantly in the pre 
sent. She took her part in the common round of daily life ; 
learned to fulfil the duties which were proper to the daughter 
of a noble house, and submitted to her tire- woman s services ; 
yet not without an insurgent protest of heart as the time 
came when these things began to speak of the family s claim 
that she should strengthen the family s position by a becom 
ing marriage. She had no intention of marrying for the 
family s sake : and when the Lady Clare made up her mind, 
her heart was with her mind ; and her heart was strong. 

Her education was that of her time and class : that is to 
say, she had an elementary knowledge of reading and writing, 

1 According to Mariano of Florence, Clare was born on 16 July, 1194. 
Tradition says that Clare s father belonged to the noble Assisian family of the 
Scefi or Scifi and was lord of Sasso Rosso, a castle on the slope of Monte 
Subasio (Cf. V. Locatelli, Vita di S. Chiara, p. 334). But the traditional 
association of her family with Sasso Rosso is open to question. Ortolana, 
Clare s mother, is, however, mentioned by name in the legend, where it is also 
said that she was of noble and knightly family. Cf. Legenda S. Clarse, ed. 
Franc. Pennacchi, p. xxix seq. 



SAINT CLAKE 133 

was proficient in the art of fine needlework and knew how to 
order the domestic affairs of a feudal household. Probably 
she was conversant in some measure with the romances of 
chivalry the literature of the period from listening to the 
minstrels who visited her father s house ; and she would gain 
a large knowledge of the questions of the day from frequent 
intercourse with people keenly alive to the various topics of 
that stimulating age when politics and religious questions 
were brought from all quarters of the world and gained an 
actual value in the intense life of the commune. And so 
without being skilled in letters, as they would say in those 
days, Clare comes into this history as a woman of cultured 
mind. " She loved to listen to a well-prepared and learned 
discourse," says he who wrote her legend, " for she held 
that the kernel of doctrine, if encased in a shell of well- 
chosen words, is more easily discerned and more heartily 
relished." 1 

But this discrimination in favour of discourses " well pre 
pared and learned " was not so much a distinctively intellect 
ual trait, as part of the general sensibility of her nature. She 
instinctively looked for the greater things of life the things 
which really mattered : it was part of the deep sincerity of 
her soul and her large spiritual vitality. She could never be 
satisfied with weak compromises in a matter of duty, but 
neither would she fuss over details of conduct which were 
not of the essence of some vital principle. But with this 
direct vision for the things of real and enduring value, was 
combined a temperament emotionally eager for beauty, per 
haps more for moral beauty than for physical. 

She loved flowers but it was because she found in them a 
figurement of the perfect soul. In her garden she nurtured 
the lily because it spoke to her of purity, and the rose because 
it spoke of love, and the violet because it is the flower of 

1 Leg. S. Clarse, ed. Pennacchi, 37. The legend is published by the Bol- 
landists, Ada SS. die 12 Augusti, torn. n. p. 742 seq. A critical edition was 
published in 1910 by Prof. Franc. Pennacchi from the Assisi MSS. Cf. also 
Fr. Paschal Robinson, Life of St. Clare, and Mrs. Balfour, The Life and 
Legend of the Lady Saint Clare, with Introduction by the present writer. 



134 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSISI 

humility. 1 Music had the power to cast her into a sheer 
ecstasy of spiritual delight. 2 But her emotional sensibility 
never escaped the control of a mind which was eminently 
practical or of a will which was stayed about with loyalties to 
whatever won her reverence. Her loyalties were the mould 
into which a great strength of character flowed and took 
shape. Even the male folk of her family, hard-beaten soldiers 
bred of a line which had maintained itself and its possessions 
by the sword and brooked not readily any opposition to its 
claims, even these stood in some awe of this strong-willed 
daughter of their house. 

Perhaps it was partly because some sort of preternatural 
destiny seemed to hover around her : for shortly before her 
birth her mother was one day praying for a safe delivery, when 
she heard a voice saying to her : " Fear not, woman ; for you 
shall bring forth a light whose rays shall enlighten the earth " : 
and because of this mysterious voice, when the child was born, 
she was baptized by the name of Clare, that is " the shining 
one". 3 With such a mark of predestination upon her Clare 
was assured of a certain liberty as one touched by heaven 
and not altogether under the despotic paternal sway. And 
so as she grew up and showed an inclination to exercises of 
religion and the service of the poor, beyond the ordinary, she 
was let go her way. Very early the capacity for self- 
sacrifice which is inherent in strongly loving natures, showed 
itself in her. She would not give to the poor merely of her 
superfluous treasures or comforts ; but she would deny her 
self of her needful food to feed them. 4 And because of her 
marvellous sympathy and gentle understanding ways with 
them, the poor loved her and all the city was speaking of her 
true charity. 

So it was that Francis heard of Clare and how her heart 
went out to the poor and how wherever she went she seemed 
to bring the light of heaven with her ; and he instinctively felt 

1 An old tradition says that Clare grew these three flowers in her tiny 
garden at San Damiano because they symbolized her three favourite 
virtues. 

3 Of. Leg. S. Clarse, 29; Actus S. Franc, cap. 42 ; Fioretti, cap. 35. 

-Leg. S. Clarse, 2. *Ibid., 3. 



SAINT CLAEE 135 

for her a great reverence, as when one comes into the presence 
of the utterly pure. And there grew up in him a great desire 
to see and speak with this maiden in whom the purity and 
gentleness of God was so manifest, that he might win her 
wholly to the service of Jesus Christ : "for he was wishful," 
says the old chronicler, " to snatch this noble prey out of the 
reach of a wicked world and to lay her, an illustrious trophy, 
upon the altar of God ". 

Clare on her part, having heard Francis preach, was con 
vinced that she had found the one guide to whose counsel 
she could wholly trust herself, and was praying in her heart 
that some opportunity would be given her of opening out her 
thoughts to him : for his sermons had given direction to the 
life-long desire, and she was thinking wistfully of a life of 
poverty and the love of God such as Francis and the brethren 
of the Porziuncola were dedicated to. But it seemed difficult 
to find the opportunity without arousing the suspicion of her 
kinsfolk, and that she must avoid if it were possible. She was 
too well aware that, however wide a liberty might be given 
her whilst she kept within the conventions of her rank, and 
was yet to be accounted an asset in the family alliances, any 
such desire as she now harboured would be regarded as 
treacherous to the family interest and honour. It was one 
thing to act the lady-bountiful and go amongst the poor dis 
tributing alms : that was the recognized privilege of the 
daughter of a noble house. Even to enter an established 
convent might present no insuperable difficulty ; there were 
convents which were, in some sort, appanages of noble 
families, and in a dignified fashion secured the patronage of 
heaven for the families whose daughters were consecrated 
within their walls. But to break through all the recognized 
conventions and pass into the ranks of the poor and work for 
her bread or depend on alms in the casual way of the street 
beggar, as did the brethren at the Porziuncola Clare had 
no illusion as to the attitude of her people to any such pro 
posal. And yet it was that for which her heart was now 
becoming eager. 

It was Francis who made the opportunity for their meet- 



136 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSISI 

ing. 1 He had already accepted, as from the hand of God, the 
charge of this rare soul. The charge had come to him not 
from his own seeking but in one of those imperious illumina 
tions of the spirit, to ignore which is to betray God. And at 
that moment the utter reverence which filled his soul banished 
all fear. Ever since his turning to the spiritual life, he had 
kept vigilant guard over even the most innocent attraction to 
the society of women. He had not allowed himself any 
friendship with them, however worthy they might be ; and 
even when as a messenger of the Gospel he had been com 
pelled to give them advice concerning their soul s good, his 
words were few. Something in his own nature had bidden 
him take this watchful course ; but partly also it was dictated 
by his own special conception of the honour in which women 
should be held. "Every woman," he would say to his 
brethren, "is a spouse of Christ : with what fear and rever 
ence therefore should we regard them." 2 

The purity of woman was to him a dower of humanity 
emanating from the purity of the Kedeerner of men ; setting 
the mark of Christ upon human affections and human inter 
course. He would not dishonour their purity nor sully his 
own by even a careless glance in which might possibly lurk 
a traitorous desire. For this reason he would not look them 
in the face ; and always spoke to them with eyes downcast. 

Only in the company of two women, the Lady Clare 
and the Lady Giacoma di Settesoli, did Francis relax 
this rule. 3 The one became a ministering Martha to the 
brethren, as we shall see in the progress of this history : but 
it was the Lady Clare who ministered to the spirit of the 
brotherhood. From the beginning she divined so instinctively 
the vocation of the brotherhood and so utterly worshipped 
it, and her every thought and desire seemed so formed by 
its innermost wisdom, that Francis and the brethren regarded 

1 Leg. S. Clarse, 5. 2 Of. II Celano, 113-14. 

3 Of. II Gelano, 112. Celano does not explicitly state that the two women 
to whom Francis referred were St. Clare and the Lady Giacoma ; but there 
can be little doubt as to their identity. They were the only two women with 
whom he had an established friendship. 



SAINT CLAKE 137 

her not as a disciple of the fraternity but as one set by God 
to witness to them the truth and sanctity of their vocation ; 
and they held her in high honour and pure affection because 
of what she was to them. 

But Clare on her part was wholly unconscious of merit, 
and accepted the reverence with which the brethren sur 
rounded her as an indication of the nobility of their own 
souls ; and with a sweet lowliness would speak of herself 
as the little plant which Francis reared in the garden of 
Poverty. 1 

So it was that Clare was not as other women to the fra 
ternity, and that Francis in her company thought of no danger 
to himself or the brethren, but took her as a sacred trust 
whose very presence on the earth would lead men to the 
worship and love of Christ. 

After their first meeting, Clare visited Francis frequently. 
Perforce she went secretly unknown to her kinsfolk. It was 
not the occasion for nice hesitations. If one must needs 
seize one s liberty by violence, the blame is to those who 
make the violence necessary. Nor would her people them 
selves have acted otherwise had it been a matter of their 
secular interest. For generations her kinsfolk had carved out 
their fortune by personal decision and maintained themselves 
by regard to their own interest : it was the tradition of every 
feudal household. And Clare in this supreme moment of her 
own fortune acted as her father s daughter. She took her de 
cision into her own hands. But for modesty s sake she made 
a confidante of one of her relatives, an aunt of like character 
to her own, who accompanied her on her visits and abetted 
her resolution. 2 

From these meetings Clare returned home with increased 
longing to be free of the world, having in her heart " a vision 
of the eternal joys beside which the world appeared more and 
more contemptible ; and more and more her soul melted with 
a holy yearning to perfect her espousals with the heavenly 

1 Cf. Reg. S. Claroe and her Testament, where the expression occurs : 
"plantula B. P. Francisci ". 

2 Cf. Wadding, Annales, ad an. 1238; A. Cristofani, op. cit. p. 92. 



138 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

King ". For " Francis acted as a faithful friend of the bride 
groom," and Clare "listened to him with the utmost fervour 
of heart whenever he spoke of the love of Jesus "- 1 

The Lenten season was drawing towards its close when 
Clare took the irrevocable step. 

Palm Sunday 2 came, and all unknowing with what the 
day was burdened, Clare s family went to High Mass in the 
Cathedral at which the bishop was to bless and distribute the 
palms. For Clare it was her nuptial Mass and she dressed 
for it with more than usual care. The distribution of the 
blessed palms began, and her family approached the altar in 
their turn ; but Clare did not move with them : overcome 
with emotion, she remained alone in her place. Whereupon 
the bishop left the altar and came and put a palm into her 
hand. Not improbably he was in her confidence and thus 
kindly gave her encouragement. 

That night when her people had retired, Clare, still ac 
companied by her faithful friend, left her father s house. 

Avoiding the common entrance, she went by a disused 
postern gate. The gateway was blocked by huge stones piled 
between massive posts, but Clare had strength that night, and 
with her own hands she cleared the gate and they passed out. 
They came to the Porziuncola, where Francis and the 
brethren, having recited matins, were waiting to receive her, 
holding lighted torches in their hands; and there in the 
night-time Clare vowed herself to God, and Francis sheared 
off her hair as a symbol of her vow. And when the day 
dawned, Francis led her to the Benedictine convent of San 
Paolo at Bastia in the marsh, where the nuns offered her a 
shelter till Francis should find a home for her. 3 

That was how the Lady Clare fled from her father s house 
and came to the Porziuncola, trusting herself to the Provi 
dence of the God she sought and to the guidance of Francis. 
From that day Clare became one of the brotherhood. But 

1 Leg. S. Clarge, 6. 2 In 1212 Palm Sunday fell on 18 March. 

3 The convent was destroyed in the fourteenth century to make way for a 
fortress, but the church still remains. The marsh has long since been drained. 
Bastia, owing to its position in the marsh, was known in early times as Isola 
Romana. 



SAINT CLAEE 139 

not without a further test of strength. The following day 
the peace of the convent of San Paolo was violently disturbed 
by an incursion of Clare s kinsfolk clamouring for her return 
and threatening to take her by force. At their coming she 
took refuge in the church ; and when they would have put 
hands on her, she unveiled her shorn head, and, laying hold of 
the altar, proclaimed her marriage with the service of Jesus 
Christ. Perhaps it was the old sense of awe at her predes 
tination, perhaps her own calm strength, which stilled their 
threatening fury : for they went away, leaving her to the life 
of her choice. 

After a few days Clare bade farewell to the nuns of San 
Paolo and went to lodge in the convent of Sant Angelo in 
Panzo, situated on the slope of Monte Subasio little more 
than a mile outside the city. 1 Here when hardly a second 
week had passed since her own flight, she was joined by her 
younger sister Agnes, resolved like herself to leave the world 
and be wholly dedicated to religion. Agnes s coming was a joy 
to both; for between these two there was a rare mutual 
affection. Agnes worshipped Clare with an admiring love 
for a greater strength in which she herself became strong ; 
and Clare loved the clinging girl because of her sweet simpli 
city and companionable spirituality of mind. 2 And each day 
since she had left her father s house Clare had yearned for the 
younger sister s companionship in her enterprise, and Agnes 
had found life joyless since Clare had fled : and in their 
prayers both had prayed that they might again be brought 
together. Then at the end of a fortnight, Agnes followed 

1 The nuns of Sant Angelo some years later removed into the city, and 
had a convent on the site of the present seminary ; but at this period they 
occupied the old convent outside the city, of which some ruins can still be 
seen. It was situated not far from Sasso Rosso, the supposed ancestral home 
of Clare. Cf. Vine. Locatelli, Vita di S. Chiara, pp. 40-1 ; Fr. Paschal Robin 
son, Life of St. Clare, pp. 139-40. In 1238 the nuns of Sant Angelo had 
adopted the Ugoline Rule Sbaralea, Bull. Franc, i. p. 258. 

2 The character of Agnes reveals itself clearly in her charming letter to 
Clare which is found in Chron. xxiv. Gen., Anal. Franc, in. p. 175. Agnes at 
the time of her flight was about fifteen years of age (Wadding, Annales, ad an. 
1253 ; Anal. Franc, in. p. 177) ; but it will be remembered that this was a 
full marriageable age in those days. 



140 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

Clare s example and fled secretly, and so came to the convent 
of Sant Angelo. 

But no sooner was her flight discovered than twelve of 
her kinsmen followed clamorously to the convent. Entering 
the chapel where the two sisters sought safety they, however, 
first spoke softly, thinking thus to win the young girl to re 
turn home, but when their soft persuasions failed, they no 
longer stemmed their anger but seized her by the hair and 
dragged her intemperately from the altar out into the open 
ground ; then taking her bodily they thought to force her 
homewards. Above the din of their imprecations, the voice 
of Agnes called to Clare to come and save her. Clare, in the 
first moment of their violence had cast herself prostrate be 
fore the altar, praying God to give her sister courage and to 
save her. Then with a renewed trust she rose up and hurried 
to her sister s rescue. 

She overtook them a little way down the mountain side. 
Agnes lay helpless on the ground ; for suddenly whether it 
was that their fury had enfeebled them, or whatever the cause 
these stout men found their burden too heavy for their 
strength and with a curse had flung her to the ground. One 
of them would have struck her in his rage ; but just then 
Clare appeared in their midst and demanded that they cease 
their violence and leave her sister to her care. 

And once again that strange power which Clare had to 
subdue people to her will, sent these men clamouring away. 
Then Clare took Agnes gently and led her back to the con 
vent. 1 And after that they were not again parted until 
Agnes was sent to be abbess of a convent at Monticelli near 
Florence, some seven years later. And there she lived for 
more than thirty years, all the while yearning to be back 
again with Clare. But when Clare lay dying she sent for 
Agnes to come to her. Death did not separate them for long, 
for Agnes died three months after Clare, and was buried near 
her sister. 2 

1 Leg. S. Clarse. 

2 See the life of St. Agnes, in Chron. xxiv. Gen., Anal. Franc, in. p. 137 
seq. ; De Conformii. in Anal. Franc, iv. p. 357. 




SAN DAMIANO 



SAINT CLAEE 141 

Clare remained at Sant Angelo until the following year ; 
and then to her joy Francis obtained for her from the Bene 
dictines of Monte Subasio, the use of the little church of San 
Damiano with the small house attached to it. The house was 
but a narrow comfortless building ; l but to Clare it meant 
home. All through the months at Sant Angelo she was like 
a bride yearning for the liberty of her own house. She was 
very definite as to the ideal poverty to which she was vowed 
and eager for its freedom, even as she always would be. And 
what made San Damiano the more sacred to her, was that 
Francis in rebuilding it, had foretold that it should be the 
home of poor ladies consecrated to the service of God. Clare 
treasured all such indications of Francis thoughtfulness for 
herself and her sisters that were to be : 2 they gave her a 
wonderful sense of security ; for adventurous and purposeful 
as she was, she confessed to herself her woman s need of a 
strength other than her own, in alliance with which her own 
strength becomes more supple and free. It is a need to 
which every true woman confesses ; and in the noble sort it 
acts as a moral searchlight upon the characters of men, re 
vealing the strong and the weak, the true and the unstable. 
At San Damiano, then, she settled ; glad that Francis had 
provided it for her ; and under her fostering care, San Damiano 
became a companion home to the Porziuncola, with just that 
difference which a woman s heart and hand will make of 
any house. And in a short while other noble ladies of Assisi 
made San Damiano their home too. 

Francis gave Clare no Rule of life : he merely set before 
her the inspiration of absolute poverty and of trust in the 
infinite solicitude of God. 3 For the rest, Clare shaped her 

1 The convent of San Damiano still preserves many of its pristine fea 
tures, and one may still see the refectory and dormitory and other rooms 
occupied by Clare and the sisters. The low narrow rooms speak eloquently 
of those first days of the Franciscan vocation. Cf. Ant. Cristofani, La Storia 
delta Ckiesa e Chiostro di S. Damiano. 

2 Vide Testamentum S. Clares, in Textus Orig. (Quaracchi), p. 274. 

3 In her Rule (cap. vi), Clare wrote : " Scripsit nobis formam vivendi in hunc 
modiim" etc. But this " for ma vivendi " can hardly be called a Rule in the 
ordinary sense of the word. It is merely a promise on the part of Francis to 
have a special care and solicitude for the sisters. But it states as a motive 



142 LIFE OF ST. FEANCIS OF ASSIS1 

daily course by the example of the brethren so far as a woman 
might properly go with them. She gave herself to prayer and 
manual labour ; l was helpful to the sick who came to her 
for comfort, 2 and welcomed the brethren whenever they 
visited the sisters to discourse about Jesus Christ and the 
spiritual life. 3 Her daily bread was provided for partly by the 
produce of a small vegetable garden which she cultivated ; 4 
partly by the alms which the brethren begged for her and 
her sisters, even as they begged for themselves. It was a 
simple homely life at San Damiano, filled however with keen 
spiritual interests and a vital delight in the vocation of holy 
poverty. That vocation meant to them a great liberty of soul ; 
and in whatever fashion the soul finds its liberty, it finds its 
paradise. The enclosure of San Damiano might be narrow 
measured by the yard-tape, but what did it matter to those 
who lived constantly on the wings of a joyous faith and whose 
spiritual horizon was limitless as the heavenly love which 
was in their hearts ? 

Even the very earth was not so strange to them now as 
when they lived in their fathers houses : it was the earth 
which the gospel of Poverty was to purify and win back to 
the law of Christ. From their enclosure they followed the 
active apostolate of the brethren with an alert interest and 

for this promise that the sisters have " chosen to live according to the per 
fection of the Holy Gospel ". In the mind of St. Francis " the perfection of 
the Gospel " always meant absolute poverty. 

Concerning the development of the Rule of the Poor Clares see TJie Life 
and Legend of the Lady St. Clare, ut supra y Introduction, pp. 11-31. 

1 See the letter of Jacques de Vitry, written in 1216, when he was passing 
through Italy. Referring to the Poor Clares he writes : " Mulieres verojuxta 
civitates in diversis hospitiis simul commorantur nihil accipiunt sed de labore 
manuum vivunt " (Sabatier, Spec. Perfect, p. 295). The words " nihil acci 
piunt" probably refer to offerings and bequests such as other religious 
received. They cannot mean that the sisters did not receive alms of food and 
other necessaries. Vide supra, p. 113 ; vide Leg. S. Claras, 37. 

2 In the Leg. S. Claras, 32, it is related that Francis was accustomed to send 
the sick to Clare to be signed with the sign of the Cross. But Blessed Agnes 
of Prague, a close imitator of Clare, used also to cook food for the poor 
and mend the clothes of lepers. (Acta SS. Mart. torn. I. p. 510). It is prob 
able therefore that the sisters at San Damiano did similar acts of charity. 

3 Leg. S. Claras, 37. 4 Cf. Reg. S. Claras, cap. vi. 



SAINT GLARE 143 

solicitude, born of their love of Christ and the world which 
they yearned to see His : and in the brethren s apostolate 
they had their part ; if they might not go out to preach for 
that was not a woman s work they could pray, and besides 
that, they had to guard in their seclusion the sacred fire 
which the brethren were to spread abroad. There were times 
indeed when Clare envied the brethren their opportunities of 
spending themselves in carrying the Gospel to the infidels 
and those who knew not Christ ; and perhaps had she lived 
in other days, she might have been the foundress of a body 
of missionary women. 1 But the time for that had not yet 
come ; 2 and in any case the world may be grateful that Clare 
was kept to feed the beacon-fire of San Damiano with her 
heroic intensity of a pure spiritual longing : for indeed in no 
more effectual way could she have realized her own ideal of 
becoming " God s helpmate and the support and encourage 
ment of the frail members of His ineffable body," 3 as all will 
admit who know the story of her life. 

Oftentimes in following out the history of the fraternity 
one asks oneself what course that history would have taken 
had that convent of San Damiano not existed ? And at such 
moments one is apt to think of that hillside enclosure as a 
lighthouse set in the sea and composedly flashing out its 
message of warning or comfort in the storm to the boats that 
pass by. For these years of early hopes and unwavering 
faith which as yet fold the brethren in a comforting embrace, 
must in the very nature of human affairs make way for the 
troublous years when faith will clash with earthly experience. 
For an association which embodies a vital ideal is much like 

1 Of. Wadding, Annales, ad an. 1251, where he relates how Glare on hearing 
of the martyrdom of the friars in Morocco in 1220, wanted to go herself to 
Morocco " to shed her blood for Christ," but was restrained by Francis. 

2 At this period the Church did not favour the active ministry of conse 
crated women, nor indeed for some centuries later. Owing to the circum 
stances of the time enclosure became more and more the law of all convents 
of women. Cardinal Ugolino made enclosure one of the fundamental prin 
ciples of his reform of religious houses of women. 

3 Vide Letter to Blessed Agnes of Prague, Acta SS. Mart. torn. i. p. 502 ; 
Mrs. Balfour, op. cit. p. 147. 



144 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSISI 

a human personality : it has its youth when the ideal treads 
lightly upon the earth and the world mostly draws aside in 
indifference or admiration, not to impede the way. But as 
the youth s purpose becomes more tangible and his incipient 
manhood must be reckoned with, then the earth itself becomes 
more ponderous and the world demands its toll and, most 
difficult of all, the heart of the man himself is apt to be be 
fogged by a consciousness of the earth and his simple delight 
in his ideal to be shadowed by conflicting interests. And 
that fate especially awaits the man or institution in whom 
there is the urgency to subject the world itself to the ideal. 
Those troublous years are not far ahead for the fraternity of 
poverty; and then the clear vision and indomitable loyalty 
of Clare in all that concerns the faith of the brotherhood will 
be a saving influence ; and San Damiano, a constant witness 
to the pure Franciscan spirit. 

From the first settling at San Damiano, Clare became in 
some measure an arbiter of the destiny of the fraternity, both 
by her decisive fashioning of her own life and that of her 
community, and also by the clear-sighted counsel she at times 
gave to Francis and the brethren. In her own household 
she would have no weak compromise with any principles 
which were not of a piece with her own vocation, at least in 
the things which mattered. In the first days this was easy 
enough to manage. But a new convent, and one that from 
circumstances promised to become a kindling light to other 
religious communities, could not long continue without 
ecclesiastical supervision : and then the difficulties began. 

Clare, with her practical good sense, early took the pre 
caution to obtain from Pope Innocent III "the privilege," 
as it was termed, of absolute poverty, 1 such as Francis had 
taught her to observe. That was in 1215, in which year the 
sisterhood became a canonical religious community. 2 Exactly 
how this development occurred it is now impossible to tell, 
or whether it was due to the initiative of Francis or of the 
Bishop of Assisi or of some other prelate in authority. Until 

1 Testamentum B. Clarce, in Seraph. Legislat. Textus (Quaracchi), p. 277. 

2 Of. Life and Legend of the Lady St. Clare, Introduction, p. 20. 



SAINT CLAKE 145 

then, Clare had refused to assume any title or style of a re 
ligious superior, in which she was but following the example 
of Francis himself ; but in 1215 she was compelled to take 
the office of abbess, though in her sweet humility she begged 
that another should be given the headship. Her troubles 
began four years later when Cardinal Ugolino, the Papal 
Legate for Central and Northern Italy, endeavoured to im 
pose upon the sisters at San Damiano and its kindred sister 
hoods for by this time San Damiano had become the 
exemplar of other communities of women a Rule of his own 
composition. 1 

These Ugoline Constitutions, as this Eule was afterwards 
styled, will be considered later on in this history : here it 
suffices to mention that they ignored the "privilege of abso 
lute poverty " and assumed the law of corporate possessions ; 
and besides this they tended to form the sisters into a new 
order distinct from the Franciscan fraternity. From that 
time until the day preceding her death, Clare s life was a 
long struggle to regain for herself and her sisters her original 
Franciscan prerogatives of absolute poverty and of inclusion 
in the Franciscan family. 

With a gentle reasonableness in which there was no ran 
cour, yet with an inflexible determination, she wooed the 
authorities to recognize her Franciscan vocation; and her 
persistency regained first one position, then another. At the 
time the Ugoline Constitutions were promulgated, Francis 
was in the East on a mission to the infidels, and the courage 
of the first protest fell upon Clare herself. Cardinal Ugo 
lino, taking the sisters under his own jurisdiction, appointed 
a Cistercian monk to be their visitor or director, but even 
before Francis return the Cistercian monk was replaced by 
a friar, Philip the Long, one of Francis first companions. 2 

It is not an unlikely presumption, from what we know of 

1 Cf. ibid. Introduction, p. 17 seq. The Ugoline Constitutions will be 
found in Sbaralea, Bull. Franc, i. pp. 263-7; also ibid. pp. 394-9; and again 
ibid. pp. 476-83, with the modifications of Innocent IV. 

2 Cf. Sbaralea, Butt. Franc, i. p. 46; Chron. Jordani, no. 13 in Anal. 
Franc, i. p. 5. 

10 



146 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

the development of the contest, that Philip s appointment 
was an answer to the prayers of Clare. On Francis return 
he took upon himself the direct guidance of the sisters at 
San Damiano, 1 and this secured Clare and her own community 
in the practice of absolute poverty, even if it did not give them 
the absolute right to it. But Francis did not claim any juris" 
diction over the other communities of Poor Ladies, and these 
remained subject to the Ugoline Eule, much to the grief of 
Clare herself. This perhaps was the period when she suffered 
most acutely and had most need of her courage. Even Francis 
himself seemed over- weighed by the troubles which had come 
upon the brotherhood in the process of its new developments ; 
and at one time he seems to have been ready in sheer weari 
ness of spirit to see the links broken which bound San Dami 
ano to the brotherhood ; but Clare in her sympathy with him 
understood, and her tenacious loyalty again saved the situa 
tion. 2 Francis, who had long abstained from visiting the 
sisters, was induced to visit them again : and in his last years 
Clare never lacked his advice and encouragement. At the 
end when he lay dying, his last message to her was to stand 
firm in the poverty she had vowed. 3 

With that message vibrating in her soul, on the morrow 
of Francis canonization, she claimed from Pope Gregory IX, 
he who had been Cardinal Ugolino, a formal confirmation of 
the "privilege of most high poverty," granted her thirteen 
years before by Innocent III; and Gregory acceded to her 
demand. 4 He had previously pleaded with her to accept 
some small property to secure the community against want ; 
and lest Clare should be hesitating because of her vow, he 
had offered her a dispensation. Clare had replied: "Holy 
Father, never shall I wish to be dispensed from following 
Jesus Christ". 5 On another occasion too did Clare s swift 
decision cause Pope Gregory to retract his words. He had 

1 Cf. Wadding, Annales, ad an. 1219. 

2 Cf. II Ceiano, 205 ; see also Fioretti, cap. xiv. 
:? Cf. Reg. S. Clarse, cap. vi. 

4 Cf. Seraph. Legislat. Text. pp. 97-8 ; Sbaralea, Bull. Franc, i. p. 771. 
Life and Legend of the Lady St. Clare, Introduction, pp. 23-4. 

5 Leg. S. Claree, 14. 



SAINT CLAEE 147 

decreed that the friars should no longer, as had been their 
wont, visit the sisters of San Damiano, save those brethren 
who were sent to beg alms for them. On learning of this 
decree Clare met the brothers who came to do the questing 
for the sisters, and bade them go back to their minister and 
say that since the friars might not visit San Damiano to in 
struct the sisters by their godly conversation and thus feed 
their souls, she would have no friar beg bread for their bodies. 
At that Pope Gregory revoked his decree. 1 But it was many 
years yet before another Pope, Innocent IV, granted to all 
the communities of the Poor Ladies the same privilege which 
Clare had gained for herself, and not until then was Clare at 
peace. It was as though she lived the last years of her life, 
only to establish them all in their Franciscan birthright ; for 
she died two days after Pope Innocent IV affixed his signature 
to the Eule which she had caused to be written as the charter 
of their liberty. 2 In everything that did not infringe the 
essential character of the Franciscan life Clare had gracefully 
submitted to the will of the Pontiffs : she accepted the Ugo- 
line regulations save in the matter of poverty, though she 
tempered their rigidity with a gentle considerateness for the 
weaker sisters in matters of superadded austerities. But she 
was tenacious of the right of the sisters to be guided in the 
spiritual life by the brethren and to be considered as one 
religious family with them. Instinctively she knew that it 
was only in this union of the Franciscan family that the 
sisters would be maintained in their true character and life ; 
and instinctively too perhaps she felt that only in this union 
would the brethren themselves be kept loyal to the pure ideal 
of their founder. For none recognized more clearly than she, 
how surely the prudence of the world would beset the frater 
nity and sow dissensions in its ranks unless it was kept stead 
fast in the security of its own faith and circumscribed by 
strong mutual charity. And so when dissensions did appear 
within the fraternity, Clare was not of those who widened 

1 Leg. S. Clarte, 37. 

2 Cf. Sbaralea, Bull. Franc, i. pp. 671-8 ; Seraph, Legislat. Text. pp. 
49-95. 

10* 



148 LIFE OF ST. FRANCIS OF ASSIST 

the rift by intemperate argument. Utterly loyal she stood by 
the pure Franciscan ideal, and never wavered nor was un 
certain in her witness to it : yet she was no partisan within 
the family. 

Much as she must have differed from the secular policy of 
Brother Elias, she would have him reverenced and obeyed 
as the minister of the whole Franciscan family. 1 And per 
haps it was that lofty spirit which soared above the rancour 
and clamour of the world s battles, which was the secret of 
her power, and extorted admiration even from those whom 
she compelled to bow to her claims. Certainly Cardinal 
Ugolino worshipped the abbess of San Damiano with a father s 
affection for a favourite daughter and a client s love for a 
favourite saint ; 2 and Pope Innocent IV, who long withstood 
her appeals but eventually granted all her demand, would 
have canonized her on the day of her burial had not the 
cardinals protested against the appearance of unseemly hurry. 3 

When Clare at length died, twenty-four years after 
Francis had gone to his rest, she left the community of San 
Damiano established in the pure observance of Franciscan 
Poverty and in the essential Franciscan life, and that whilst 
the brethren were still disputing as to the wisdom of the Rule 
which Francis had written. 

We have anticipated something of Franciscan history in 
order to show what manner of woman Clare was and what 
her coming meant to the brethren at the Porziuncola and 
how she brought to the fraternity a new element of strength. 

But in the imagination of the world outside her coming 
cast a new and tender glory over the religious revival which 
had already set in through the preaching of the brethren. In 
her the self-renunciation and endurance of the brethren which 
had compelled the reverence of the citizens, gained a more 
subtle and sublimated beauty. The purely heroic at the 
Porziuncola became the worshipful at San Damiano. There 

1 Vide second letter of St. Clare to Agnes of Prague, in Ada SS. Martii, 
vol. i. p. 505 ; Life and Legend of the Lady St. Clare, p. 144. 

2 Vide letter of Gregory IX to St. Clare in Chron. xxiv. Gen., Anal Franc, 
in. p. 188. 

Leg. S. Clarse, 47. 



SAINT CLARE 149 

is no record of any harshness on the part of the people 
towards Clare and her sisters, but only of love and wonder 
ment : their eyes turned towards the convent below the hill 
as they would have turned towards the home of Nazareth, and 
they mingled their willing services for Clare with an adoring 
homage. Was not her mere touch sufficient to rid the sick 
of their maladies ? And did not the air seem purer and more 
morally wholesome because of her presence ? 

That was in fact the great miracle : from the convent of 
San Damiano purity radiated like sunlight over the whole 
country-side. Evil desire was shamed both in men and women. 
The women longed to be pure as Clare, and men learned to 
reverence their purity and to be pure themselves. "From 
every side," says he who first penned her story, " women ran 
to the odour of her ointments ; * virgins hastened after her 
example to consecrate themselves to Christ ; married women 
lived more chastely ; young men in eager crowds, spurred on 
by the heroic example of the weaker sex, cast aside the allure 
ments of the flesh." 2 And for that, more than for aught else, 
Clare was loved, because in an age which sang of chivalry, 
she gave to the world a vision of pure women strong in faith 
and fearless in loyalty. 

1 A quotation from Cant. i. 3. 3 Leg. S. Clarse, 10. 



CHAPTEE V. 
FIRST ATTEMPTS TO BEACH THE INFIDELS. 

THE Lady Clare had been but a few months with the nuns 
of Sant Angelo in Panso when the news of the great victory 
of the Christian army of Spain sent a thrill of excitement 
through all Christendom. The Moorish power had been 
overwhelmed at Las Navas on 16 July. Innocent III had 
awaited the result of the campaign with anxiety ; l upon its 
issue depended much of his future policy. Now the pos 
sibility of a new and successful crusade for the recovery of 
the Holy Land seemed nearer. It would be difficult to 
over-estimate the effect of the news upon the minds of the 
more devout in every Catholic country. They received it 
gratefully as a sign of Heaven s favour, and as a new in 
centive to give good service for the faith of Christ : for the 
infidels were the scourge of the Christian world sent as a 
punishment by God, because of the sin and indifference to 
religion amongst the Christian peoples. And the indevout 
were stirred too ; for the victory of Las Navas they knew 
would press forward the movement for a new crusade con 
templated by the Pope. But to none did the good news 
come as a signal for action more emphatically than to 
Francis. He too was elated, as were all true Christians, at 
this victory of the Cross : but through his elation there ran 
a swift pity for the infidel fighting against God. Perhaps 
in his simplicity he thought that so great a disaster would 
make them more ready to recognize their errors. At any 
rate he felt called to go and preach to them the faith of the 
Cross. And so it was that the battle of Las Navas became 

1 Cf. Innocentii III. Rcgest. lib. xv. 15 [ed. Migne], Epist. Quanta nunc 
necessitas. 

150 



FIBST ATTEMPTS TO BEACH THE INFIDELS 151 

incidentally a factor in the evolution of the Franciscan 
apostolate. 

Hitherto the journeyings undertaken by the brethren 
had not extended very far beyond the confines of Umbria. 
Francis himself had spent the greater part of the preceding 
year in evangelizing the northern borders of Umbria and 
also Tuscany, and in this latter province had established 
several hermitages and left small colonies of the brethren. 
At Florence he had received many novices into the frater 
nity ; amongst them John Parenti, a Doctor of Laws, who 
many years later will succeed Francis as Minister-General of 
the Order. And here, too, he founded one of the first houses 
of the brethren outside Umbria ; for the citizens opened their 
hearts to him and gave him a small house near the church of 
San Gallo outside the city, where some of the brethren might 
dwell. He went too as far as Pisa, where at his preaching 
two young men begged to be allowed to join his company : 
they were Agnellus, the future leader of the brethren on 
their coming to England, and Albert who succeeded Agnellus 
as Minister-Provincial of the English Province and then be 
came Minister-General of the Order. 1 

Yet it was chiefly in the country around Lake Thrasy- 
rnene that Francis had worked that year. He had passed 
the whole of the great Lent in seclusion upon one of the 
islands in the lake the Isola Maggiore ; 2 then he went forth 
to evangelize the neighbourhood. 

So he came to Cortona and preached there. Now when 
the sermon was concluded a youth named Guy approached 
Francis and offered him a lodging in his house. He was 
a noble youth and very wealthy, but quite unspoiled by his 
possessions which he held as a trust for the poor ; and always 

1 Of. Wadding, Annales, ad an. 1211. 

2 Vide Fioretti, cap. vi. ; cf . I Celano, 60. Tradition points out a miracu 
lous well on Isola Maggiore, which was granted to the prayer of Francis : "it 
is good for headaches," the fishermen of the lake will tell you. A convent of 
friars was later built on the island ; the convent church now stands uncared 
for and desolate, since the expulsion of the friars about 1862. Many frescoes 
attributed to Gozzoli adorn the walls, but they are becoming hardly dis 
tinguishable. 



152 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIS1 

he gave to the poor whatever he did not need for his own 
frugal maintenance. Francis gladly accepted his proffered 
hospitality. That evening Guy waited upon Francis and his 
companion as upon most honoured guests ; he washed their 
feet with reverence and himself served them at supper ; and 
when the meal was over he begged that they would consider 
his goods as their own and whenever they were in want of 
habits or anything else allow him to supply their need. Fran 
cis was entirely won by the youth s open-handed generosity 
and his delicate courtesy ; and when he and his companion 
were retiring to rest, he said : "My dear brother, this noble 
youth, who is so mindful of and grateful to God, and so loving 
and courteous towards his neighbours and the poor, would do 
well for our life and company. For know you, dear brother, 
that courtesy is one of the properties of God, who of His 
courtesy, gives His sun and rain to the just and the unjust : 
and courtesy is the sister of charity by which hatred is ex 
tinguished and love is cherished. And because I have seen 
so much divine virtue in this man, therefore gladly would I 
have him for a companion." And at that Francis began to 
pray that Guy might become one of the fraternity. Guy 
meanwhile felt a keen desire not merely to befriend his guests 
in their needs but to be one with them in their life, and 
shortly afterwards he came and cast himself on his knees 
before Francis, asking to be admitted into his company. So 
he distributed all his goods to the poor, and afterwards in the 
public church received the habit of Poverty. 

Now some little distance from Cortona, at the foot of the 
high hill on which the city is built, and on the other side 
from the low ground which stretches out to Lake Thrasymene, 
there is a gurgling rivulet which comes from the mountains, 
passing down its rocky course through a deep ravine ; and by 
the side of this rivulet there were then some rock caves. 

Hither Francis and Guy now betook themselves, and 
made a narrow hermitage so near to the rivulet that its 
waters sprayed the walls of their caves. 1 And there Guy 

1 In the present friary of the Celle, one is still shown the original cave- 
hermitage ; but additions were made to the original building by Brother Elias, 



FIKST ATTEMPTS TO EEACH THE INFIDELS 153 

made his abode until his death many years later. He divided 
his days between prayer and manual work, even when after 
a time he was ordained priest by obedience. Now and then 
he interrupted his life of contemplation and climbed the long 
hill and preached to the people of the city : but it was mostly 
by his life that he preached to them : and the Celle the caves 
in which Guy and his companions lived became a constant 
admonition to the citizens, of the life which is beyond this 
earth. 1 

At Cortona, too, about the same time that Guy entered 
the fraternity, Francis is said to have received another pos 
tulant one whose name will become famous in the years 
that follow : more famous than that of Guy, but not so blessed 
Brother Elias, of whom we shall hear much before the close 
of this story. 2 

Francis also evangelized the district to the south-east of 
the lake, and left remembrances of his tour in the hermitages 
he established for his brethren at Cetona and Sarteano in 
the mountains. 3 It was at Sarteano that Francis endured 
and overcame a great temptation. For one night whilst he 
was in prayer he was tempted to repent him of the life of 
penance he had undertaken, but immediately arousing him 
self he cast away the thought. But to that temptation there 
succeeded another, and though Francis scourged himself till 
his body was discoloured and wealed, yet the temptation per 
sisted. It was then winter and the hillside was covered with 
snow. Unable by scourgings to subdue his recalcitrant body, 

the Vicar - General of St. Francis, and later on by the Capuchins in the 
sixteenth century. As it stands, however, the Celle is one of the few remain 
ing convents of the Order which retain the primitive character of Franciscan 
" loci ". Even the latest additions are in keeping with the earlier buildings. 

1 Cf. Acta SS. Vita B. Guidonis, die 12 Junii, torn. n. p. 601 scq. It 
is probable, as J. Jorgensen has pointed out, that Guy is the hero of the story 
related in the Fioretti, cap. 36. 

2 The Vita B. Guidonis, loc. cit., says that at the Celle, Francis also 
received Elias de Villa Ursaria. Wadding, Annales, ad an. 1211, takes this 
Elias to be the Brother Elias so famous in Franciscan history. It is how 
ever doubtful ; for Elias, the Vicar-General, was more probably born in Assisian 
territory (vide infra, p. 259). 

3 Tradition puts the establishment of these hermitages in the beginning 
of 1212. Cf. Wadding, Annales, ad an. 1212. 



154 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSISI 

Francis rushed out naked into the snow and set to make 
seven snow heaps. Then in his southern fashion he turned 
upon himself, exclaiming : " That large heap is thy wife, those 
four are thy two sons and two daughters, the other two are 
thy manservant and maidservant. Make haste to clothe 
them all for they are dying of cold." Thus he continued to 
make mockery bravely of his temptation, until starved with 
the bitter cold, he retorted upon himself : " If the care of them 
thus troubles thee, betake thyself to serve God only ". The 
temptation vanished and Francis returned to his cell thank 
ing God. 1 

Meanwhile others of the brethren were carrying the 
message of Poverty to other cities and districts. Brother 
Bernard da Quintavalle had been sent to Bologna, where 
scholars from all parts of the Italian peninsula crowded the 
law-schools for which the city was famous throughout all 
Europe. It was a somewhat bold adventure to carry the 
Gospel of simplicity and unworldliness into the midst of this 
active world of youthful intellectual ambitions and conceits : 
and surely it was the imperious instinct of destiny which took 
the brethren thither, as an invading army must make for the 
strongholds of the country invaded. For nowhere was the 
spirit of the world in more direct contrast with the spirit which 
created the fraternity than in the law-schools of Bologna. 
There the wisdom of the heart wholly docile to the word 
of Christ, which was the only wisdom Francis valued, was 
wholly at a discount. Men did not go to the schools to learn 
the truth of life or how to live as Christians should who 
have eternal souls to think about : indeed most of the 
scholars would have laughed at the very notion. Know 
ledge was to the student what bales of cloth were to the 
merchant, a commodity for making one s way in this world 
and getting, if need be, the better of one s neighbour. The 
very atmosphere of the schools breathed a subtle materialism : 
intellectual conceit and pedantry were its ordinary products : 
affectation of intellectual superiority went hand in hand with 
a callous brutality and licentiousness. 

illCelano, 116. 



FIEST ATTEMPTS TO EEACH THE INFIDELS 155 

To Bologna, then, the grave and courteous Bernard da 
Quintavalle had gone, having first commended his journey to 
the Lord Christ his Master. He was received as an object 
of sport by the students and citizens. When he appeared in 
the streets he was mobbed and ill-treated. But in the end 
his meekness and constancy came out victorious. An in 
fluential citizen, who was also a doctor of laws, one named 
Nicholas di Pepoli, won by the evident holiness of the ill-used 
friar, befriended him and gave him a lodging, and after a 
time established the brethren in a house just outside the city. 
And Bernard came to be reverenced by the people as a saint, 
until in his humility he fled away, more fearful of the 
honours than of the ill-treatment. Appearing before Francis, 
Bernard said to him: "The house is founded near the 
city of Bologna ; command the brothers that they maintain 
it and stay there ; but I have no more profit there because of 
the too great honour which is paid me : for I fear I should 
lose more than I should gain ". So Francis sent other 
brethren to Bologna, and these in time spread the fame of 
the fraternity throughout all Lombardy. 1 

Thus had Francis and the brethren exercised themselves 
in their vocation, when, as we have said, the victory of Las 
Navas set men thinking of the crusade, and turned the 
thoughts of Francis towards the conversion of the infidels. 

It was not in his character to make any elaborate pre 
paration for a new adventure. When a knightly service 
called him, he as true knight must obey. Nor indeed was 
there any need for delaying preparations. The weapons of 
his warfare were always ready, his pity for men who knew 
not God and his own fervent faith. His mission, he would 
always aver, was that of herald or messenger of the Divine 
Redeemer : when he had delivered his message and won men 
to the Christ-like life he must leave it to others the clergy and 
rulers of the earth to organize and govern Christ s kingdom. 

1 Of. Vita Fr. Bernardi in Chron. xxiv. Gen., Anal Franc, in. pp. 36-7 ; 
Actus S. Franc, cap. 4 ; Fiorctti, cap. 4; .Wadding, Annales, ad an. 1211; 
Vide Acta SS. mense Oct. torn. n. p. 843 seq. ; Hilarin de Lucerne, Histoire 
des Etudes, p. 132. 



156 LIFE OF ST. FRANCIS OF ASSISI 

So with just his faith and pity he set out on this mission 
to distant lands as he had undertaken his journeys in Catholic 
Italy. After all, God would be with him whether he was 
amongst Christians or infidels. And if the infidels would 
not be won by his preaching and he must attest his faith by 
martyrdom, as very likely would happen were God to grant 
such grace to his unworthiness, he would die the better for 
the simplicity of his obedience to the call. It might seem 
strange to those who do not know Francis, that he thus un 
hesitatingly set out for a far-off land, prepared to die on his 
quest, whilst yet the fraternity was hardly established. But 
Francis did not look upon himself as necessary to the 
growth of the brotherhood. God could foster His own work 
and raise up another leader for the guidance of the brethren. 
The one thing which mattered was that he should obey 
the Divine will and set the brethren an example of knightly 
fidelity to the vocation in which they were called. 

It was probably in the autumn of 1212 that he took boat 
for Syria, sailing from Ancona. But this true call of his 
spirit for true it was, as we shall see was not to be ful 
filled in so direct a fashion. Hardly had they set sail when 
a storm arose, and the vessel, driven out of its course, was cast 
upon the coast of Dalmatia. There for a time Francis and 
his fellow-passengers were stranded. It was now impossible 
to proceed to the Holy Land ; there was even a difficulty in 
getting a return passage to Italy. Francis had no money to 
pay his way and the masters of the boats in those parts, did 
not appreciate his plea of poverty. Eventually when all per 
suasion proved fruitless, Francis had recourse to the stratagem 
of the needy. He and his companion were smuggled on 
board a vessel about to sail, with the connivance of one of the 
crew, who also undertook the care of a plentiful supply of 
provisions which a timely friend provided for the brethren s 
use. And this forethought proved of greater advantage to 
them than was at first designed. For the weather being 
still stormy the boat was long delayed on its journey so that 
the sailors ran short of food : but Francis shared his provi 
sions with them and thus won their hearts, and by the time 



FIKST ATTEMPTS TO KEACH THE INFIDELS 157 

the boat reached the port of Ancona, Francis had found a 
reverent audience who listened willingly to his fervent dis 



courses. 



Thus his first endeavour to reach the infidels resulted 
only in his evangelizing the crew of a ship, at least so far as 
the result was then visible. But as in much that Francis 
did, the value was not in the immediate achievement ; it was 
rather in the inspiring idea. That yearning of his soul 
towards the strangers who stand outside the kingdom of 
Christ will remain with him all through his life, and send 
him forth again in attempts to win them to the Gospel of 
his Lord ; and all his attempts will seem fruitless of their 
purpose : and yet they will set in the heart of the Christian 
world a new policy towards the peoples whom all Christen 
dom regarded only as the enemies of the Cross. 

The crusades had indeed been forced upon the Christian 
nations as a measure of defence : that was their initial justifi 
cation. But it is hard to wage war with a people and yet 
retain for them the elemental charity which the Divine 
Eedeemer came to cast over the earth. In the course of the 
crusades Christendom had come to look upon the infidels as 
an evil race, to be exterminated or brought to submission by 
the sword. That was the prevalent notion. True, attempts 
were occasionally made to convince them of their errors by 
argument. Popes themselves had written letters to the Sul 
tans in this strain. But these overtures were of the sort 
which the general of an army might make in the hope of 
obtaining a bloodless submission. 

Altogether different was the spirit in which Francis 
dreamed his dream of converting them. The infidels were 
souls for whom Christ had died, and he would bring to them 
the message of the Christ for their own salvation. Fondly 
he hoped that if this message were brought to them without 
the din of secular warfare or the debatability of worldly argu 
ment, they would listen. At least he would meet them in the 
spirit of the Kedeemer, and if need be, die meekly at their 
hands, as Christ had died, offering his life for their salvation. 

1 I Celano, 55 ; Tract, de Mirac. 33 ; Leg. Maj. ix. 5. 



158 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

Such was the new and spiritual crusade which he conceived 
in the simplicity of his own piety and faith. He himself 
might accomplish but little in the way of actual conversion 
amongst the infidel nations ; for that is frequently the way 
with the most vitalizing ideals : they need to be transplanted 
into a less sensitive soil from that in which they are born, 
before they actualize into tangible results. Francis ideas 
concerning the vocation of the fraternity had the essential 
vitality of ideal truth. Oftentimes they were of too pure a 
spirituality to be wholly acceptable to ordinary mortals ; yet 
were they as a flame which purged the accepted standards of 
much of their grossness ; and sometimes they cast a glamour 
of conviction about new and exalted ways, and thus opened 
them to a more common acceptance. So it was with his idea 
of converting the infidel by the power of the Gospel itself. 
That idea became an integral element in the life of the frater 
nity, scattering the brethren in after years into distant lands 
beyond the confines of Christendom ; sending them forth in 
their poverty and faith without the aid of secular arms or 
diplomacy, even as the Apostles went forth in the first days 
of the Gospel. 1 And that was one of the good things Francis 
did for Christendom : he fanned in the Church a new en 
thusiasm for the conversion rather than for the conquest of 
" the enemies of the Cross ". That first attempt of Francis 
to reach the infidels, which stranded him on the shores of 
Christian Dalmatia, was therefore no true failure, but the 
first sowing of a seed which will blossom when the winter is 
past. 

On his return to Italy Francis undertook evangelizing 
tours through the Marches of Ancona and Umbria : yet not 
without first experiencing a period of doubt as to whether he 
was personally called to the active ministry of preaching or 
to the secluded apostolate of prayer. But we cannot say 
whether this time of hesitation followed at once upon the 
frustration of his design to preach to the infidels, or a little 

1 The letters of Gregory IX reveal the marvellous activity of the Fran 
ciscan friars as simple missionaries amongst the infidels. Cf . Sbaralea, Bull. 
Franc, i. pp. 93, 100, 102, 106, 155, 233, 269. 



FIEST ATTEMPTS TO KEACH THE INFIDELS 159 

later in consequence of another incident the story of which 
we will now relate. 

About the end of the spring of 1213, Francis was preaching 
in the Komagna when he came to Montefeltro on a spur of 
the Apennines as you enter Tuscany. It was a small fortress- 
town perched upon a rocky ledge high in the mountains and 
ruled by the lord of the castle around which the town was 
built. The place was in high festival when Francis arrived, 
for a relative of the lord of Montefeltro had lately been 
knighted and the event was being celebrated with song and 
tourney and all the gay pleasantry of a feudal feast ; and from 
all the neighbourhood the friends of the knight had gathered 
to do him honour. It was just an occasion to fire the 
imagination of Francis. The symbols of chivalry never left him 
unmoved. A great company had gathered in the courtyard of 
the castle perhaps to witness a joust at arms or maybe a min 
strels contest. Francis pressed forward, and mounting upon 
a parapet, besought the grace of the company that he might 
speak. Entering into the spirit of the scene he took as the 
text of his discourse a couplet of a minstrel s song : 

Tanto e il bene ch aspetto 
Ch ogni pena m e diletto "- 

" So great is the good I have in sight, In every hardship I 
delight ". And straightway he launched into a recital of the 
service of Christ as set forth in the heroic endurance of the 
Apostles and martyrs and holy men and women, who in their 
joy of the heavenly vision had deemed penance and even 
death as a small price for so great a gain. 

Now amongst the listeners was the lord Orlando dei 
Cattani, lord of Chiusi in Casentino ; and such was the effect 
of the discourse upon him, that when Francis had finished 
speaking and had gone down amongst the crowd, Orlando 
sought him out and begged that he might confer with him 
concerning his soul s salvation. "Eight willingly," replied 
Francis, " but this morning thou must do honour to thy 
friends and dine with them and after thou hast dined we will 
confer together." So Orlando dined with his friends and 



160 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSISI 

afterwards he and Francis sat long in conference, and at the 
end Orlando offered Francis a retreat on Monte Alvernia 
high up in the solitudes of the Apennines, for the use of the 
brethren : it was a place, he said, remote from the high-roads 
and most suitable for contemplation and the penitential life. 
Francis gladly accepted the offer and promised to send breth 
ren there at once. He himself was now bound for Assisi, 
but later on, he too would follow the brethren. 1 

Now it may be that this gracious act of the lord Orlando, 
in setting apart for the use of the brethren the secluded re 
treat of Monte Alvernia, coming so shortly after the failure 
to reach the infidels, may have caused Francis to doubt the 
heavenly source of the inspiration which sent him upon that 
apparently bootless journey, and to doubt further whether 
after all his part in the work of the fraternity was that of a 
missionary at all. Not every brother was called to preach ; 
some would fulfil the vocation of the brotherhood better in 
the activity of the contemplative life. In prayerful solitude 
these would cultivate the intensity of spirit which is apt to be 
lost on the world s highways, and be as a flame enkindling 
the preachers with spiritual fire. 

Hence Francis deemed that in the fraternity there should 
always be some who would be wholly given to the in 
terior life of contemplative prayer, whilst others were em 
ployed in the ministry of the divine word. And about this 
time he was hesitating as to his own proper part in the life 
of the fraternity. 

He was again at the Porziuncola when this doubt came 
to a head : but whether it was before he met the lord Orlando 
or after, we cannot definitely say. 2 

l Fioretti, I Consid. Stim. ; Actus, cap. 9. The date of the donation of 
Alvernia is attested by the lastrumentum donationis Montis Alvernce to be 8 
May, 1213. Of. Sbaralea, Bull. Franc, iv. p. 156, n. h. The Fioretti charac 
teristically weaves the story of the donation into the story of the Stigmata, 
the principal event in Francis life connected with Monte Alvernia : but the 
description of the sermon bears every trace of authenticity. Compare it with 
I Gelano, 23 ; 3 Soc. 25 ; Leg. Maj. in. 2 ; and also with the description of 
Francis style of preaching in the letter of Thomas of Spalatro (infra, p. 302). 

2 More probably it was after the donation of Alvernia, when St. Clare was 
already at San Damiano with the sisters who. had joined her. So I conclude 



FIEST ATTEMPTS TO EEACH THE INFIDELS 161 

Unwilling now to trust to his own judgment, Francis 
called Brother Masseo and telling him all his doubt, bade 
him go to Sister Clare and beg her first to pray to God 
and then declare to him what God should put into her mind 
concerning this matter ; and Masseo was to go to Brother 
Sylvester also, who was then in solitary retreat, and beg him 
in like manner to say what God willed. On Masseo s return 
Francis received him ceremoniously as the ambassador of 
God and washed his feet and made for him a repast. 
Afterwards they went together into the wood, and there 
Francis threw himself upon his knees and stretched forth his 
arms in the form of a cross and thus listened to Masseo. 
Both Sister Clare and Brother Sylvester, Masseo told him, 
had declared that Francis vocation was to go forth into the 
world and preach the Gospel for the salvation of souls ; for 
that the grace of the vocation was not given him for himself 
alone but also for the saving of others. Hearing this, Francis 
rose up and said with fervent conviction : " Then let us go forth 
in the name of God". And taking with him Brothers 
Masseo and Angelo Tancredi, he without any delay set out 
on a journey. He took the road which leads across the 
valley, going by the further side towards Spoleto. 

As he went along, his mind wholly free from troublous 
doubt, all the country-side seemed to respond to the joyous 
gratitude towards God which filled his soul, and a closer 
kinship between him and the earth suddenly revealed 
itself. 

They had passed through Cannara, which you can reach 
in about two hours walking from Assisi, and were on their 
way to Bevagna, another two hours easy going, allowing for 
the fatigue of the lengthening journey, when they came to 
the place now called Pian d Area, where the white road is 
flanked on either side with wide-stretching verdant fields, 
with here and there a group of trees casting a kindly shadow 

from the wording of the Leg. Maj. xn. 2. M. Sabatier places the appeal to 
St. Clare and Bro. Sylvester after the journey to Spain ; but the wording of 
Celano more naturally points to the period immediately following the return 
from Slavonia (Dalmatia) and preceding the journey to Spain, 

11 



162 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSIST 

in the hot sunlight. At this spot Francis attention was ar 
rested by a multitude of birds of all sorts, who had gathered 
there perhaps because of the fine harvests : and at the sight 
of them and the sound of their many voices, he felt a great 
tenderness towards them, and there came upon him a yearn 
ing to make himself a brother to these merry creatures 
of God. 

At that, he bade his companions stand still, and himself 
ran forward into the midst of the birds, half afraid though he 
was that they might fly away at his approach. But instead, 
and to his surprise, they remained in position as though 
awaiting him. And for this Francis felt very grateful and 
grew more tender. He greeted them with his usual greeting : 
" My brothers, God give you peace " ; and began to speak 
caressingly to them. " My brother birds," he said, "much 
ought you to praise your Creator and to love Him always ; 
Him Who has given you feathers for clothing, wings for 
flight and all that you have need of. God has made you 
noble among His creatures, for He has given you a dwelling 
in the purity of the air, and though you neither sow nor reap, 
He yet protects and governs you without any care of your 
own." In such wise he spoke to them ; and they at the 
sound of his voice grew more confident and came nearer and 
moved their heads to look at him and spread out their wings 
in great contentment and twittered their trust in him. Then 
seeing how trustful and friendly they were, Francis moved 
about amongst them : yet they showed no fear. At length he 
blessed them with the sign of the cross and bade them de 
part : and only then did they fly away. 1 

Francis and his two companions then proceeded on their 
way to Bevagna. But that had happened to Francis which 
even he himself hardly yet understood. The earth had opened 
to him another of its great secrets. Once before the mystery 
of life had lifted and he had found himself in spirit a brother 
to the outcast and the leper ; and that had been the beginning 
of his new life. To-day it was a like happening. He had 
run to the birds in a heightened sense of that friendliness 

1 1 Celano, 58 ; Leg. Maj. xn. 2-3 ; Fioretti, cap. xv. ; Actus, cap. 16. 



FIBST ATTEMPTS TO EEACH THE INFIDELS 163 

which he had always felt for the brute creatures and which 
had before often won their confidence. 1 

But as he went on his way he was conscious of a new 
and different feeling. It was as though a new sense had been 
given him, and his heart beat with an intimate understanding 
of the heart-life of the beasts and birds and all sensitive 
things. He felt no longer a kindly stranger amongst them : 
they had become as life of his life, even as the poor had be 
come some years before. And with this new understanding 
there came to him a wonderful power over all the wild life 
which moves upon the earth and in the air and water. The 
most timid or ferocious became fearless or tame at his side. 
Many are the stories related by those who knew Francis, of 
this singular power of his. For example : at Alviano, Francis 
was disturbed in his preaching by the swallows who were 
building their nests and chirping and chattering the while. 
"My sisters, the swallows," he called to them, "it is now 
time for me to speak ; you have been speaking enough all 
the time." And at once the swallows ceased their chirping 
until the sermon was over. 2 Once at the Porziuncola a cicala 
made its home in a fig-tree near Francis cell. At Francis 
call she would come and sit upon his hand. Then he would 
say : " Sing, my sister cicala, and praise the Lord thy Creator 
with a joyful song ". And the cicala would at once begin to 
sing and continue singing until Francis joined her in song : 
nor would she go away until he bade her. But after eight 
days Francis told her to leave the place ; for he would not 
hold the wild things even in a willing captivity. Then the 
cicala flew away and did not again return. 3 But most 
characteristic of all is the story of the wolf of Gubbio. It 
happened in the last years of Francis life when he was too 
infirm to walk. He was on his way to Gubbio and had 
passed the night at the monastery of San Verecondo in the 
hills. Next morning he set out upon an ass ; but as he was 
about to proceed some peasants came running to him, telling 

1 e.g. during his fast on Lake Thrasymene two years previously, a rabbit 
attached himself to Francis and would hardly leave him. Cf. I Celano, GO. 
" I Celano, 59 ; Leg. Maj. xu. 4. 3 II Celano, 171. 

11* 



164 LIFE OF ST. FRANCIS OF ASSISI 

him not to go forward as the country was over-run with 
ravenous wolves, who would surely eat both him and the 
ass. Francis answered gaily : " But what harm have I done 
to my brothers, the wolves, that they should eat me and the 
ass? I will go on in the name of God." When he came to 
Gubbio he found the city in a panic of fear. Francis 
thereupon preached to the people, telling them that this 
trouble had come upon them because of their sins, and 
persuading them to live better lives if they would be friends 
with God and His creatures. But after the sermon he went 
out to seek the particular wolf who was the chief cause of the 
terror, and in his marvellous way he tamed the beast, and 
brought him into the city in meek and docile mood and had 
him fed : and from that time the wolf became the pet of the 
city until he died and, as tradition says, was buried honourably 
by the citizens on the spot where he had long been lodged, and 
where afterwards a church was built to commemorate this 
wonderful thing, under the title of San Francesco della 
Pace. 1 

But on the day when Francis first discovered his brother 
hood with the birds he did not yet realize the power that had 
come to him. As he went along the road to Bevagna he was 
only conscious of a new freedom of spirit amongst God s 
creatures which gave him great gladness. Yet athwart the 
gladness there fell a shadow of remorse that he had hitherto 
been a stranger to all this vast creation and had failed to 
preach the word of God to his brothers the birds. 

The journey through the valley of Spoleto and that also 

1 It has long been the custom to regard the story of the wolf of Gubbio in 
the Fioretti, cap. 20, and Actus, cap. 23, as a mere allegory or myth. But the 
story has in recent years received two curious supports for its substantial 
authenticity. I refer to the Passio S. Verecundi, an almost contemporary 
chronicle published by Mgr. Falocci-Pulignani in Miscell Franc, x. pp. 6-7. 
This chronicle puts it beyond doubt that Francis came to Gubbio at a time 
when the country was being ravaged by hungry wolves. Cf. Archiv. Franc. 
Hist. an. i. fasc. i. p. 70. As to the tradition of the wolf s lodgment and death 
in Gubbio as related in the text, there is the finding of a wolf s skull imbedded 
beneath the ancient walls of the church of San Francesco della Pace, of which 
a full account is given in " Gubbio, Past and Present," by L. McCraken (Dent), 
p. 283. 



FIEST ATTEMPTS TO EEACH THE INFIDELS 165 

through the Marches of Ancona, whither Francis also went 
about this time, became indeed a veritable triumphal pro 
gress. The people crowded around him bringing their sick 
to be healed, and they were happy if they could but touch 
his garments ; still happier if they could tear off a piece to 
keep as a relic : so that he was in danger of going habitless. 
Even the things he handled became sacred in their eyes and 
were kept reverently for the relief of the sick. 

At some places the clergy and townsfolk, hearing of his 
approach, came out to meet him ; the church-bells were rung 
joyously and the children marched in procession clapping 
their hands or carrying palm-branches and singing as they 
went along. In the Marches of Ancona and on the borders 
of the Eomagna the success of his preaching was especially 
remarkable. At Ascoli thirty men, learned clerks some of 
them, joined the fraternity. Even the heretical Patarini, who 
were strong in numbers in those parts, respected his preach 
ing and did not oppose him, though in opposition to their 
doctrines he was at pains to impress upon the listening 
crowds the duty of obedience to the Koman Church and re 
spect for priests. 1 

And here we may mention one trait in the apostolate of 
Francis which conduced not a little to the success of his mis 
sion. It mattered not -to him whether he was preaching to 
a large crowd or merely to one or two people : he spoke as 
freely and fervently in one case as in the other. 2 Totally 
unconscious of himself, he poured out his message of penance 
and peace and love with a burning eloquence even if but one 
man were listening. The incentive to speak was not de 
pendent on the numbers or quality of his audience but in 
his own wonder at and realization of the eternal mysteries 
and in his zeal to fulfil the commission laid upon him. He 
spoke because he must, and from the fullness of his heart. 
And it was only when this necessity of speech was upon him 
that he could speak at all. At other times, if called upon to 

1 1 Celano, 62. 

2 " Populorum maximam multitudinem quasi vivum unutn cerncbat ct uni 
quasi multitudiiie diligentissime prtcdicabat" (I Celano, 72). 



166 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSISI 

preach, he would merely bless the people and turn away. 1 
He would never speak to them as a matter of form. Nor 
could he prepare sermons beforehand as ordinary preachers 
must. On the few occasions when he attempted to deliver a 
carefully prepared discourse, he failed utterly : the prepared 
speech fettered his spirit and his mind became a blank. 2 And 
so when he did speak, his words were like the sudden letting 
loose of pent-up waters, rugged and swift in their flow, awe 
some in their force and in the sense they gave of the volume 
of life behind, and yet melodious to the ear and steadying to 
the soul of the listener as the flow of vast waters always are. 
Francis at length returned to the Porziuncola, but the call to 
the infidels was still in his heart, and before the winter had 
set in, he had again started out to fulfil his desire. 3 

This time his intention was to preach to those Moors who 
had been defeated so severely the previous year at Las 
Navas : so he took the road to Spain, intending to cross 
thence into Morocco. His companions included Brother 
Bernard da Quintavalle who had left Bologna in fear of the 
reverence paid him there, as we have already said. So eager 
was Francis to reach his goal that it was with difficulty his 
companions could keep up with him on the road : "he seemed 
like one intoxicated in spirit," says St. Bonaventure, so swiftly 
did he press forward. But again his adventure was to fail of 
its purpose. When he reached Spain the fatigue and the 
hard winter weather brought on a sickness, and Francis 
could pursue his journey no further. When he was suffi 
ciently recovered to be able to travel, he turned his face home 
wards, convinced that his immediate duty was with the 
brethren in Italy. 4 But some say that on his way home, he 
turned aside to seek comfort for his soul at the shrine of St. 
James the Apostle at Compostella, and that whilst he knelt 
there, he received an inward assurance that this journey 
would not be in vain, since on his homeward travel he would 

1 1 Celano, 72. 

2 Ibid. ; cf. II Celano, 107. 

3 Cf. Chron. xxiv. Gen. in Anal. Franc, in. p. 189. 
4 1 Celano, 56 ; Leg. Maj. ix. 6. 



FIBST ATTEMPTS TO BEACH THE INFIDELS 187 

find places for the establishment of the fraternity and receive 
many brethren into the Order. 1 

1 Chron. xxiv. Gen. in Anal. Franc, in. p. 9 ; see also pp. 189-90, where 
various incidents concerning this journey are related. Tradition says that 
Francis actually founded places for the friars at Burgos, Logrono, etc., and 
that he predicted at Montpellier the foundation of a house of friars there. Cf. 
Wadding, Annales, ad an. 1213. On the other hand the Bollandists hold that all 
these foundations belong to a somewhat later date. Cf. Acta SS. mense Octob. 
ii. p. 603. 



CHAPTEK VI. 
FRANCIS ATTENDS THE FOURTH LATERAN COUNCIL. 

FROM the time that Francis had made his first effort to preacl 



to the infidels the fraternity had been rapidly increasing in 
numbers and activity. Before the close of 1215, the brethren 
were well known throughout the whole of central and 
northern Italy ; and a beginning of the apostolate had been 
made in Spain and southern France. 

In Italy the wonderment in which was a curious com 
mingling of the readiness to scoff and the impulse to worship 
which had been aroused by the friars on their first appear 
ance, had given place to a more consistent reverence. Francis 
and his brethren had become an accepted fact in the reform 
movement of the period ; and throughout lJmbria,"Tuscany, 
the Marches of Ancona and Lombardy, dwelling-places of 
the fraternity had sprung into being as the nests appear in 
the trees in the early spring-time. They were small hermit 
ages either on the outskirts of the cities and towns or in the 
hills not far away. For the people, won to better thoughts 
by the life and preaching of the brethren, were unwilling to 
see them depart from their neighbourhood, and the brethren 
wanderers as they must be for the .sake of Christ were 
glad of a welcoming retreat to which they might retire amidst 
their labours and find refreshment for their souls in un 
disturbed prayer and in the companionship of each other. 

The establishment of the brethren in a neighbourhood 
was in the best sense of the term, a social event. They be 
came part of the life of the place. For though they accepted 
usually only such places as had a certain solitariness to re 
commend them, yet they dwelt there only at the will of the 
owner or of the commune. They took part in the labour of 

168 



FEANCIS AT FOUETH LATEEAN COUNCIL 169 

the day with the country folk or in the houses of the citizens, 
and depended upon them for their daily bread. They 
thus made themselves sons of the people even whilst they 
were to them apostles of a new religious life ; and their pre 
sence pervaded the landscape and brought a new element as 
of some intimate concern, into the life of the community and 
into every household. That was one of the strange things 
about these new religious. They won their way not by de 
liberate dominance, whether social or intellectual, over others, 
but as children win their way, by very dependence. In their 
entire poverty and still more in their gentleness and wide 
human sympathies, they threw themselves upon the goodwill 
of their fellow-men : and this dependence proved in large 
measure their strength. Men grown cynical and suspicious 
of attempts to force religion upon them, were softened and 
disarmed when it came to them disrobed of every appearance 
of worldly interest and ambition. Moreover it was very evi 
dent that these men had not embraced poverty as a weapon 
of party warfare either in opposition to the Church or in its 
defence ; but because they loved it for its own sake as one 
loves a precious gain. What the gain really was, or why it 
should be allied to such absolute poverty, might be a mystery 
to most of those who saw them : yet they felt it was there 
and was worth having in their midst. Its presence spelt for 
them a vision of purity and charity and noble endurance and 
of a joyous faith in the heaven to come. In this way did 
the fraternity win the heart of the Italian people ; giving to 
them of its own spiritual treasure, yet depending on them 
for all manner of human good-will. 

And it was not only the laity who thus welcomed and 
succoured the brethren. The parish priests were as kindly 
and worshipful as their parishioners. Here_ and there a 
priest might rebuff them as meddlers and hypocrites"; 1 but 
generally speaking the priests were their friends and opened 
their doors to them hospitably when the brethren begged & 
night s lodging as they went from place to place. And in 
deed it would have been strange had it been otherwise ; for 

1 e.g. I Celano, 46. 



170 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSISI 

the brethren showed marked reverence for all priests and 
taught the people to respect them. In striking contrast to 
the reforming sectaries, Francis and his friars would tolerate 
no ill-word against a priest, since to them he was the re 
presentative and minister of the priesthood of Christ. To 
those who spoke ill of a priest Francis would reply, " I know 
not whether his living be worthy of respect or otherwise ; but 
this I know that his hands convey the sacraments to many 
people and bring salvation to their souls : therefore will I kiss 
his hands in all reverence." l 

Nor would he allow the brethren to preach in any parish 
against the will of the parish-priest, 2 or in any way to inter 
fere with their parochial rights. 3 And so whether with the 
laity or the clergy, he won his way by gentleness and 
humility. 

"What perhaps most recommended the brethren to the 
authorities of the Church was that, wherever they were re 
ceived by the people, the spirit of faction and heresy was 
lessened: men forgot their discontent and shook off their 
quarrels ; a new sense of life sprang up amongst them, beside 
which political programmes and party feuds were of little con 
cern. Of those who had hitherto thought of reform as some 
thing to set their neighbours right, many now began to take it 
as something primarily concerning themselves : and that was 
the beginning of peace. Moreover in this new religious re 
vival the Church was not set as a bone of contention in the 
midst. Francis and the brethren took the Church for granted ; 
they did not discuss its claims. On occasion, when drawn 
thereto by the heretics, they would assert their belief and pro 
fess their reverence, but they did not argue. Very swiftly the 
people recognized that the brethren saw in the Church, above 
and beyond the petty contentions of men, a Divine presence 
amidst the things of earth : and this simple uncontentious 

1 Of. Admonit. 26 in Opuscula [Quaracchi], p. 18. Concerning Francis 
reverence for priests, cf. II Celano, 8, 146, 201 ; Spec. Perfect, cap. 54 ; Regula 
Prima, cap. 19 ; Tcstamentum S. F. 

2 Cf. Testamentum S. F.; Scripta Fr. Leonis [Lemmens], n. 6; Spec. 
Perfect, cap. 50. 

3 Cf. Scripta Fr. Leonis, ut supra ; Spec. Perfect, cap. 10. 



FBANCI8 AT FOUETH LATEBAN COUNCIL 171 

faith did more to revive the loyalty of a people whose faith 
was strong in spite of discontent, than all controversy could 
have done. The faith of the brethren was its own argument : 
such was the ascendancy they obtained over the people s 
imagination. 

Every year the brethren scattered throughout the Pro 
vinces gathered together at some appointed place, 1 about the 
time of the Pentecost festival, to receive the instructions -p(\fty 
of their spiritual father and to consult with him concerning 
the affairs of the fraternity : thus a close union was kept be 
tween Francis and all the brethren and between the brethren 
themselves. 

They do not seem to have met always at the Porziuncola : 
at least on one occasion the chapter of the brethren was held 
near the monastery of San Verecondo in the neighbourhood 
of Gubbio, and at that chapter three hundred brethren were 
present : for whom the Abbot provided the necessary food. 2 

To these gatherings the brethren came gladly, for the 
family spirit was strong amongst them. Francis took the 
opportunity to impress upon their minds the fundamental 
principles of their vocation and to warn them against the 
dangers they must meet with on their journeys. He would 
especially remind them of the reverence due to priests and to 
the ordinances of the Church, lest they should be led astray 
by the heretical reformists. They were, moreover, to avoid 
sitting in judgment upon men who lived delicately or were 

1 " Semel in anno cum multiplicilucro ad locum determination conveniunt," 
writes Jacques de Vitry in 1216 (vide his letter published by M. Sabatier 
in Spec. Perfect, pp. 296 seq. ; and by Boehmer, Analekten. zur Oeschichte des 
Franciscus von Assisi, p. 94 seq.). We know also from Celano that St. Francis 
from the beginning would frequently call the brethren together to consult 
with them about the fraternity (of. I Celano, 29). Probably from the early 
days the more important annual Chapter was held at Pentecost in imitation 
of the gathering together of the Apostles. 3 Soc. cap. xiv. speaks of the 
Chapters of Pentecost and Michaelmas; but it is uncertain whether the 
Michaelmas Chapter was instituted before the institution of Provinces in 
1217. Pere Mandonnet, O.P. (Les Regies et la gouvernement de VOrdo de Pceni- 
tentia t chap. in. p. 201 note), seems to hold that both chapters were of earlier 
institution. 

2 Leg. de Passione S. Verccundi, in Miscell. Franc, x. p. 6. Cf . Archil). 
Franc. Hist. an. i. fasc. i. pp. 69-70. 



172 LIFE OF ST. FEANCIS OF ASSIST 

proudly clad : rather were they to revere all men as their 
lords and brothers. Wherever they came they must endea 
vour to bring peace and harmony amongst men, and this they 
would do if they had peace and good-will in themselves. In 
fine, they were to remember that their mission was " to heal 
the wounded, bind up the broken-hearted, and recall them 
that had erred". " Many may seem to us," he would add, 
"to be limbs of the devil, who nevertheless shall become 
disciples of Christ." Sometimes the admonitions and pre 
cepts given by Francis at these Chapters were incorporated 
in the Eule for their better remembrance. When the Chapter 
was over, the brethren again set out for their different places 
or went on a journey newly assigned them, with their hearts 
burning and their souls braced up. 

These were indeed the joyous years of the fraternity s 
growth. Without any doubt the brethren had their own in 
dividual difficulties and temptations which developed the 
strength of their manhood but they were not such as make 
history ; and so it is that apart from the incidents related in 
the preceding Chapter, the three or four years following the 
"conversion" of the Lady Clare, give comparatively sparse 
harvest to the historian of the early Franciscan days. His 
tory is not made in the equitable sunshine but in the frosts 
and tempests and scalding heat : for history is not life itself 
but the record of life s transitions and violent efforts. 

But that was now about to happen which was to intensify 
still more the life of Francis and his brethren and link up 
still further their destiny with the religious movement of the 
age : though at the time they were hardly conscious of any 
unusual stirring in their calmly vivid lives. 

In the November of 1215 Francis was summoned to Eome. 
Innocent III had convoked a General Council to assemble at 
the Lateran on St. Martin s Day, and Francis, as the founder 
of a new order, was bidden to be present. 1 

1 In fact so unconscious were the friars of any special link between 
Francis presence at this Council and subsequent events in his history, that 
the early biographers do not even mention his attendance at the Council. 
Fortunately we have the evidence of the Dominican author of the Vita 
Fratrum (vide infra, p. 181) and of Angelo Clareno (infra, p. 177). 



FEANCIS AT FOUETH LATEEAN COUNCIL 173 

The Council was in truth an assemblage of all the forces, 
spiritual and temporal, of the Catholic world. Archbishops 
and bishops and the representatives of kings and princes; 
heads of monasteries and universities, and proctors of every 
established interest in the Church and petitioners for interests 
yet to be established all had come to Eome as to " the ex 
alted citadel whence the best public opinion of the age was 
to send forth its decrees for the ordering of the Christian 
nations". 1 As the assembled prelates and representatives 
knew well, it was a council~of war! TEe Pope had called 
them together with the acknowledged purpose of bringing 
the religious aspirations of the time into immediate conflict 
with its devastating worldliness and rising infidelity. He was 
willing to stake his whole policy upon an attempt to gather 
to his side whatever in Christendom was yet responsive to 
the ideal of a Church purified from the evils which were 
sapping the very foundations of the Christian life. HLejwQuld 
demand from all the Catholic peoples a supreme effort to 
root out both heresy and the more insidious worldliness which 
were eating into the Church s life, and to arouse the nations 
from the apathy which allowed the infidels to keep possession 
of the most sacred sanctuaries of Christendom. 

The occupation of the Holy Land by the infidels was to 
Innocent, as to all the religious spirits of the Middle Ages, a 
symbol of the disloyalty of the Christian people to Christ and 
the Church. The recovery of the Holy Places was a matter 
of honour with every honest Christian ; an attestation of his 
faith in the Divine Eedeemer Who had there lived and died. 

Innocent III perhaps did not realize how far the temper 
of the nations had receded from the point which might have 
made a crusade successful ; or if he did, being a mystic as 
well as a politician, he may yet have bound himself to issue 
his war-cry and shame a recreant world. Also he was not a 
man to be diffident of carrying through a purpose to which 
he had set his hand. In his masterful spirit he may have 
thought himself able to bring the laggard states to decisive 
action. But whatever may have .been his further outlook 

1 Baronius, Annales, ad an. 1215. 



174 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSIST 

upon the issue of his policy, he associated the idea of an in 
ternal reformation of Christendom with an effort to recover 
the Holy Places. A crusade would revive the people s faith 
and go hand in hand with moral reform. And for this In 
nocent had convoked the Council, to take its opinion and 
still more to issue his command. 

So on St. Martin s Day, the Conciliar Fathers and dele 
gates were assembled in the church of St. John Lateran for 
the opening of the first session. Innocent preached the 
inaugural sermon. Clearly his words rang out, and in his 
voice was an impassioned sincerity. For the moment the 
statesman in the Pontiff gave place to the prophet. It would 
seem that he already had some intimation that his days 
would not be long, and that he must not delay if he would 
see the consummation of the work he had taken in hand. 
This prescience of an early death hangs pathetically over 
the strenuous vitality with which he directed the Council. 
It dictated to him the text for his opening sermon : " With 
desire I have desired to eat this pasch with you before I 
suffer". 1 "Truly," he went on to say, " might this Council 
be called a pasch, for the word pasch means passage," and from 
this assembly he looked for a threefold passage of the nations 
a passage to the Holy Places, a passage from vice to virtue, 
a passage from this temporal life to the life eternal. Not in 
temporal ambition had he called the Fathers together, but 
that the Church might be reformed and the Holy Land be 
once more in Christian hands. 

If God would not grant him to see the accomplishment 
of his desire, he would not refuse to drink this chalice of 
Christ s passion : he would not refuse death, though he would 
that he might live in the flesh until the work now to be be 
gun, were consummated. " Not my will, but God s, be done ! " 

Then swiftly he depicted the misery of the Holy Places 
trod under foot by the infidels. " Jerusalem, the city of 
sorrow, is calling to all who pass by the way to come and see 
if there be sorrow like unto hers : and shame and disgrace 
will it be to them who pass by unheeding." But another 

1 Luke xxn. 15. 



FRANCIS AT FOURTH LATERAN COUNCIL 175 

sorrow called out to them from amidst the abominations 
which were in the midst of the Christian peoples, the sorrow 
of the Church denied by the people s sin : and at this the 
Pontiff deftly took up and expounded the ninth chapter of the 
Prophet Ezechiel, applying its reforming ordinances to the 
situation of the moment. 

He himself, as the supreme pastor of God s Church, 
he explained, was "the man clothed in linen with a writer s 
ink-horn at his loins ". To him the Lord had said : " Go 
through the midst of the city, through the midst of Jeru 
salem ; and mark Thau upon the foreheads of the men that 
sigh and mourn for all the abominations that are committed 
in the midst thereof ". His audience were " the six men that 
came from the way of the upper gate ". To them the command 
of the Lord was "to go after their leader through the city 
and to strike," sparing none save " those upon whom they see 
Thau " : they are to strike with all the power at their disposal 
interdict, suspension, excommunication and deposition 
till the city be cleansed. Yet must they strike in order to 
heal, kill in order to quicken ; according to the words of our 
Lord: "I will not that the sinner die". Chiefly must they 
look to the clerical order : and now Innocent s words, sharp 
and decisive as they had been, took on a keener edge : 
" When the priest sins, he makes the people sin too ". " How 
can the pastors who live evilly reprehend those who live in 
iniquity ? These will but reply : the son cannot do but what 
he sees his father doing ; it is sufficient for the disciple that 
he be as his master ; and so is the prophecy fulfilled : there 
shall be like priest like people." l 

It was a masterly discourse, superbly courageous, entirely 
sincere. Its spirit dominated the deliberations of the Council 
and urged the Fathers to the devising of heroic measures. 

A new crusade was decided upon ; the Roman Curia was 
to be purified of secular ambition and the avarice of its 
officials ; and the reformation of the clergy, thus begun at the 
fountain-head, was to be carried throughout all ranks. 

a Labbaeus, Sacrorum Conciliorum Collectio [edit. 1778], vol. xxn. pp. 
968-73. 



176 LIFE OF ST. FRANCIS OF ASSIST 

So the Council ordained : but the Crusade proved a 
failure, and the cleansing of the Eoman Court from the scandal 
of avarice was thwarted by the distrust of the nations. 1 And 
yet the Fourth Lateran Council has justly been styled the 
Great Eeforming Council of the Middle Ages ; for though it 
failed of its more immediate and ambitious decisions, it adopted 
and uttered with the sacrosanct utterance of the highest 
authority, the cry of the age for a more Christian life amongst 
clergy and laity, and set in motion forces by which a new life 
was to be given to a degenerate faith and a slackened moral 
sense. The proclamation of a crusade received but a faint 
hearted response ; but the decrees ordering the bishops to 
appoint worthy men to preach the word of God in their dio 
ceses, and still more the decisive adoption of the penitential 
movement and fraternities into the organized system of the 
Church, were the salvation of Catholic Christendom. 

But it is in reference to Francis and his fraternity that 
we are concerned with the Council in this history. Francis 
had been called to Rome either by the Pope himself or by the 
Cardinal-Protector, John of St. Paul, to represent the interests 
of the fraternity. For it had been determined to direct the up 
rising of the new penitential fraternities into the already estab 
lished ways of the monastic or canonical life, 2 so as to bring 
them more effectively under the authority of the Church and 
temper the fanaticism which not unfrequently entered into 
the constitution of the new fraternities. And in fact the 
Council did decree that no new Rules should be allowed, but 
all orders founded in the future must adopt one of the tra 
ditional Rules as the basis of their organization. 

Happily for Francis and his fraternity, their Rule had 

1 Of. Abbot Gasquet, Henry III atid the Church, chap. v. 

2 The traditional religious communities were of two sorts ; the monks who 
mostly followed the Rule of St. Benedict, and the canons-regular who followed 
the Rule of St. Augustine. The various congregations either of the monastic 
order or the canonical, differed in their constitutions and customs, but they 
all professed the same rule according as they were monks or canons. The 
Franciscan Rule, however, was sui generis and the Friars Minor were neither 
monks nor canons ; they represented the new penitential fraternity pure and 
simple. 



FRANCIS AT FOURTH LATERAN COUNCIL 177 

already been approved by the Holy See, and when the question 
of the new orders came up for discussion, Pope Innocent 
notified the Council of his approbation of the Friars Minor. 1 
It is evident that the Pontiff had no intention of going back 
upon his original approbation ; for not only did he thus form 
ally confirm his sanction of the Rule of the brethren in the 
presence of the representatives of the Church ; but about this 
same time he extended the "privilege" of absolute poverty, 
as accorded to the brethren, to Clare and her sisters at San 
Damiano. 2 

Such formal approbation was undoubtedly of the first 
importance to the life of the fraternity in that it preserved the 
individuality of the Franciscan family at a critical moment : 
but it did not add anything to the life of the brethren itself 
nor tend to expand its vital energies. And yet, as we have 
said, this Council was to stir deeply the heart of Francis and 
leave its mark upon the fraternity. 

It came about in this way : all unconsciously on the part 
of the Pontiff and the Council and without deliberation on 
the part of Francis as in fact the most vital happenings 
occur. 

Francis had come to the Council as one might approach a 
holy place, expectant of the majesty of God. To him this 
assembling of the bishops of Christendom was as another 
Pentecost : for truly he believed that where the Church was 
thus assembled there would be the Divine Spirit ; and as he 
entered the great cathedral church of the Catholic world on 
that first day of the Council, this sense of the opening 
heavens was upon him. So he had awaited the sermon of the 
Supreme Pontiff. One needs the reverential spirit to receive 
a prophet s words ; and of all that vast assembly, none was 
so reverent as the lowly friar in his unkempt garb. To him 
the sermon was as a personal message ; had he not already 
known that the judgment of God was hovering over a forgetful 
world, held back only by God s own mercy ? And now the 

1 Of. Angelo Glareno in Ehrle, Archiv fttr Litteratur und KircJien-Ge- 
schichte, torn. i. p. 557. 

2 Vide supra, p. 144. 

12 



178 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSIST 

Pontiff speaking as God s representative on earth was announc 
ing judgment and extending mercy. Eagerly he seized upon 
that promise of mercy in the judgment to come, to all who 
were signed with the Thau, the mark of penance and the 
new life in Christ. With that mark he would sign him 
self and the brethren and all who would listen to his words. 
And the Thau seemed, as the Pontiff explained its meaning, 
the ordained mark of the sons of Poverty. " Thau," the 
Pope said, " is the last letter of the Hebrew alphabet " 
(Francis treasured those words as indicating the humility 
in which the Gospel was founded), "it expresses the form 
of the cross such as it was before Pontius Pilate placed 
the title upon it. This sign he carries on his forehead 
who shows forth the power of the cross in his deeds accord 
ing to what the Apostle says : they have crucified their 
flesh with the vices and concupiscences ; and again : God 
forbid that I should glory save in the cross of our Lord Jesus 
Christ, by whom the world is crucified to me and I to the 
world. Such a man indeed weeps and groans over the abomi 
nations which are in the midst of the city, since the sins of 
one s neighbour are the hell of the just." 

Every word fell upon the ears of Francis as an echo of 
the spirit which had led him on these nine years past ; yet 
with a fresh emphasis and as words of a full and immediate 
wisdom which gave direction and force to latent energies. 
From that moment he took to himself the sign Thau as the 
symbol of the vocation of the brethren. It became his sign- 
manual : with it he marked his dwelling-places and subscribed 
his letters l as with a saving talisman. 

But chiefly did he bear the Thau in his very soul : for 
now he began to mourn even more passionately than hereto 
fore over the world s sin and to feel a greater pity for the 
world upon which God s judgment must surely fall if it did 
not repent. And from that time too he began to ponder upon 
some means of bringing the Divine pardon more swiftly to 
repentant souls. Never before perhaps had he realized so 
deeply and with such entire conviction the message which 
1 Celano, Tract, de Mirac. 3 ; Leg. Maj. iv. 9. 



FKANCIS AT FOUKTH LATEKAN COUNCIL 179 

Sister Clare and Brother Sylvester had sent him two years 
ago, that God had called him not for his own salvation only 
but also for the salvation of others. 

Of a surety now he felt that the brethren were "the 
heralds of the great King" sent to carry out the Pontiff s 
commission of judgment and mercy, but chiefly of mercy : 
for as Pope Innocent had declared in the summing up of his 
sermon : " God desires not the death of the sinner". 1 

Men whose lives are a faithful aspiration after some moral 
or spiritual ideal, not infrequently experience these sudden 
deepenings of their most cherished convictions, wrought by 
some unexpected word or action : and these experiences bring 
with them a new illumination and assurance and a keener 
urgency to realize the cherished life which is in them. In 
the beginning of their spiritual growth such urgency is com 
monly supplied by the discovery of hitherto unrecognized 
objects of reverence or affection ; but later it proceeds not so 
much from new ideas or mental recognitions, but rather from 
the will or affective faculty itself. A chance word perhaps 
will reveal to the heart its own possession not in a new light 
but with a fuller, more translucent light : and upon such 
revelations does a man s life bound to its final perfections. 

In some way Francis must have had the feeling of being 

1 1 do not know if anyone has hitherto connected St. Francis devotion 
to the sign Thau with Pope Innocent s sermon : but to my mind the con 
nexion seems certain. There is no historic evidence of the use of the Thau 
until after the Council ; but we know Francis used it not long afterwards ; and we 
may be quite sure that that devotion had its origin in some external event, as 
all Francis devotions had. Then there are the two visions of Brother Paci- 
ficus. In the first vision which happened before the Council, in 1213 or 1214, 
he saw Francis marked with two flaming swords in the form of a cross, i.e. 
a four-limbed cross (II Celano, 106 ; Leg. Maj. iv. 9) ; another time, but after 
the Council, "before he became Minister of France," Pacificus saw him with 
the Thau on his forehead (ibid.). 

One can hardly read the inaugural sermon of Innocent III without being 
struck by its intense sympathy with the penitential spirit which gave rise to 
the penitent fraternities of the time. It was such a sermon as Francis could 
not have listened to without feeling that the Pontiff in his magisterial capa 
city, was proclaiming the gospel of penance such as he himself and the 
penitents had been preaching. And it was the Pontiff who proclaimed the 
Thau as the badge of the penitent spirit. 

12* 



180 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSISI 

adopted into the declared policy of the assembled Church, as 
he listened to Innocent s injunctions to the Council : for un 
doubtedly in so far as they referred to the cleansing of 
Christian society from internal vice and luxury, they were 
the official response to the penitential movement by the su 
preme Pastor of Christendom. All unconscious of it as he 
was, Francis was in fact in the eyes of the Pontiff, the re 
presentative of that movement in its purest form. Another 
man there was present at the Council, who was to turn that 
movement into a defence of the dogmatic position of the 
Church ; and that was Dominic Guzman who had come to 
petition the Pope for leave to found a new order of Preachers. 
But Dominic s purpose was directly to defend the faith of 
Christendom against the argumentative attacks of the here 
tics ; whereas the purpose of Francis was that primary aim 
of the penitent upheaval, the more perfect practice of the 
Gospel-life. How far, one wonders, was Pope Innocent con 
scious that in these two men would be found the driving 
force which was to realize the prophetic mission of purgation 
which he had set before the Council ? And did their pres 
ence give inspiration to his thought when he met the Con- 
ciliar Fathers at the Lateran ? One would not lightly hazard 
an affirmation, knowing how seldom forceful minds, like that 
of Pope Innocent, are conscious of their dependence upon the 
actions of others. And yet, such was the greatness of his 
nature, whether or not he foresaw their future destiny, he 
could not let them pass by, but must gather them into the 
armoury of the Church. But this formal adoption of the 
Franciscan fraternity into the forces of the hierarchy will 
necessarily bring about wide-reaching results in its consti 
tution and development : it will become more intimately 
associated with the general forward policy of the Church : a 
secluded growth will no longer be possible ; its individuality 
must find its setting in the common life and system of the 
Catholic hierarchy, of which it now becomes a more intimate 
member. And of this too you may be sure, that the two 
fraternities of Francis and Dominic having thus formally 
been adopted by the Church, the orthodox penitential move- 



FRANCIS AT FOUETH LATERAN COUNCIL 181 

ment will gradually find itself entirely drawn within their 
enfolding organizations : and the fraternities will grow not 
merely from the vital force within them but by the shep 
herding care of vigilant authority : and that too will affect 
their ultimate history. 

But as yet these further consequences are hidden from 
the common gaze, in the veils of time ; and they do not detain 
the thoughts of Francis whose one purpose is to carry out 
his mission as it comes to him. Yet even so, he was conscious 
of an enlargement of the horizon which bound the limits of 
his activity. He was brought for the first time into definite 
alliance with the larger policy of the Church and with other 
forces which were working for the regeneration of Catholic 
Christendom. Thus before the Council was over he had 
entered into comradeship with Dominic Guzman of whom 
we have just spoken. 

Their first coming together in friendship is one of the 
romances of history. Neither knew the other till they came 
face to face on one of these busy days in the streets of Rome. 
Doubtless on his journey through Italy, Dominic had heard 
of the Friars Minor and had been curious as to their founder, 
of whose doings men were now talking with wonderment. 
One night during his stay in the Eternal City, Dominic in a 
dream saw himself and a man he did not know, presented by 
the Blessed Virgin to Jesus Christ, as the destined messengers 
of divine mercy to the world. The next day, coming across 
Francis, he recognized in him the man of his dream and went 
forward and claimed acquaintance and told the dream he had 
had. Then embracing Francis, he exclaimed : " You are my 
comrade and we will run together. Let us stand together 
and no enemy shall overcome us." 1 

Dominic Guzman was at this time about forty-five years 
of age, that is to say, he was Francis senior by about eleven 
years. Whilst Francis was still dreaming about a soldier s life 
and leading the revels in his native city, Dominic had already 
been preaching against the heretics in the South of France. 
He had no gay past to trouble his conscience. From child- 

1 Vitce Fratrum in Monumenta Ord. FF. PP. vol. i. pars 1, p. 10. 



182 LIFE OF ST. FEANCIS OF ASSISI 

hood he had been of a religious cast of thought, and had early 
been sent to school under some Canons Kegular. 

He had a clear logical mind : in after years he would ex 
pound the Epistles of St. Paul in the household of the Pope, 
during his visits to Eome, like any master in the schools. 
Even in his student days he was austere and ascetic in 
his personal conduct, and for years would not taste wine. 
But withal he was pitiful towards others who were in need. 
Once during a famine he sold his books to feed the poor ; at 
another time he offered to exchange places with a captive 
who had fallen into the hands of the Moors, because the 
captive had a family dependent upon him. 

His future career w T as determined by his friendship with 
Diego, Bishop of Osima. The bishop took Dominic with 
him on a visit to Eome in 1205. Pope Innocent was just 
then sending three legates and twelve Cistercian abbots to 
preach in Languedoc where the Albigensian heresy was mak 
ing portentous headway ; and he now attached the Bishop of 
Osima and his friend to the mission. 

On one occasion a conference had been arranged between 
the bishop and Dominic on the one side and the heretics on 
the other. The bishop meant to go in great pomp, thinking 
to over-awe his opponents, but Dominic persuaded him to 
put aside the paraphernalia of his rank and to appear at the 
conference barefooted and armed only with the meekness 
and humility of the Gospel. 1 

In 1206 the Cistercian abbots left the field to go to the 
General Chapter of their Order at Citeaux : in truth their 
mission had not been a great success. Dominic and his 
bishop were left to carry on the work of defence ; then two 
years later the bishop died and Dominic became virtually 
the leader of the Catholic propaganda. He showed again 
of what temper he was when in 1209 he refused to take part 
in the crusade against the Albigenses and confined himself to 
his own proper work of preaching. He believed that heresy 
would not be uprooted by secular arms, but by the word of God 
expounded by men whose lives witnessed to their own belief. 

1 Vita Fratrum, loc. cit. pars 2, pp. 67-8. 



FKANCIS AT FOUETH LATEKAN COUNCIL 183 

By 1215 Dominic had gathered around him some priests 
of a like mind to his own ; and had received from Fulk, 
Bishop of Toulouse, leave to form them into a company of 
preachers ; and then he came to Borne to seek the Papal 
sanction for his new order of Preachers. At first Innocent 
had hesitated to give a formal sanction. He still favoured 
the idea of renovating the established monastic orders with 
the apostolic spirit rather than of founding new orders. But 
when the Council was over, he bade Dominic return to 
Toulouse and with the advice of his companions draw up a 
Constitution for his fraternity, based, however, upon the 
Bule of St. Augustine in accordance with the decree of the 
Council regarding new orders. 1 

Some hard words have been uttered by a latter-day world 
about the founder of the Friars Preachers : he has been de 
scribed as a stern inquisitor, more zealous for a theological 
system than for the souls of men : yet they who have thus 
described him, can hardly have read the records of his life. 
He was indeed first and last the defender of the Catholic 
Faith against an encroaching heresy : and this mission of de 
fence was his life and the mould of his character ; he lived 
for that one purpose. One might call him a man of ideas 
rather than an idealist : and that would account perhaps for 
the fact that in after years Dominic was remembered not for 
his personality but for the work he achieved as founder of an 
order. 2 We have indeed no well-defined portrait of the man : 
but such glimpses of him as we obtain of him from the 
chroniclers, show him to have been a conscientious, zealous 
worker for the Faith, with a clearer vision of what was need 
ful for the overcoming of heresy than most men of his day, 
and with a forceful will capable of achieving a purpose he 
had set himself to achieve. He perceived the futility of com 
bating heresy with the sword whilst the mind was left unin- 
structed and unconvinced ; and he saw too that no intellectual 
argument would avail unless the preacher manifested in 
his own life the Gospel he preached. And so out of his 

1 Cf. Ada SS. August!, torn. i. p. 358 seq. 
2 Cf. P. Sabatier, Vie de S. Francois, p. 248. 



184 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSIST 

experience and his own sincerity he conceived of an order of 
militant penitents who would make war upon heresy with the 
two weapons of theological learning and an ascetic life. 

A very different character, you will see at once, from 
Francis. It was the meeting of the experimental man of 
affairs with the idealist. And yet between these two there 
was the bond of a common loyalty wholly separated from 
any personal ambition or self-interest. Both were heart and 
soul dedicated to the service of Christ without any ulterior 
motive, and both had before their minds the reign of the 
Christ amongst men as their single objective. In that com 
mon loyalty their friendship was established. They met 
in the simplicity of their purpose, and knew each other for 
what they were ; nor could they ever again be strangers to 
each other, however far apart their separate vocations might 
lead them. Dominic indeed at one time would gladly have 
united the two fraternities under one rule and leadership : so 
great was his reverence for Francis. But that was not to be. 
Each had his own part to play in the drama of life : neither 
could have fulfilled the special purpose for which the other 
was designed. Yet their friendship has rightly been crowned 
by tradition as a noble companionship in arms : for upon the 
minds of their contemporaries they left the conviction of a 
sacred emulation in which each strove to accomplish his 
separate work for the same Divine Master, with a true rev 
erence and regard for each other. How often they met 
after that first meeting in Kome, we cannot say : probably 
not frequently. But the one authentic reunion related in the 
legends bears out the verdict of history. The two leaders 
had met in conference with Cardinal Ugolino, and both had 
been of the same mind that their fraternities would serve the 
Church better in their proper condition of evangelical hu 
mility, than if they were to assume rank and position in the 
hierarchy : for the cardinal had wished to take the future 
bishops from their ranks ; and to that neither of the founders 
would agree. When the conference was over and the two 
friars were leaving the cardinal s house, Dominic turned to 
Francis and begged of him his cord that he might wear it in 



FKANCIS AT FOUKTH LATEKAN COUNCIL 185 

remembrance. Francis consented, though somewhat reluc 
tantly because of the undisguised reverence which prompted 
the request. But Dominic receiving the cord, at once girded 
himself with it. Then the two spontaneously clasped each 
other s hands, and thus for awhile held converse. " Brother 
Francis," said Dominic at length, "I would that your order 
and mine were one and that we might live in the Church 
under the same rule." When finally they parted and took 
their different roads, Dominic said to those who were with 
him: "In truth I tell you, that all religious should imitate 
this holy man Francis, so perfect is his holiness ". 1 

Three centuries later Andrea della Eobbia made that 
clasping of hands of the two founders, the subject of one of 
his immortal terra-cottas ; but as one gazes upon it, remem 
bering the life-stories of the two men, one s thoughts are 
carried beyond the personal incident, and Francis and 
Dominic are types of two spirits usually found amongst men 
in active opposition the spirits of liberty and law. 

The very breath of Francis life was the liberty of soul 
which he found in the service of Christ : the beauty of the 
Gospel, as he saw it, was the spiritual freedom it gave as an 
inheritance to its faithful observers ; 2 and it was that freedom 
he hungered for and sought in all his ardent adventure. 
Dominic on the other hand was restless for the law which 
the Church had received from Christ : he was zealous for its 
ordered dogmas of faith and for the established authority 
without which the faith could not stand. Only the fanatic 

1 II Celano, 150 ; Spec. Perfect, cap. 43. It is impossible to fix precisely 
the date of this meeting. It must have been after Cardinal Ugolino first made 
the acquaintance of Francis at Florence in 1217. Dominic was in Rome 
(where this meeting took place) in the winter of 1217, also in 1218 and again 
in December, 1220, and in the earlier months of 1221 (Acta SS. loc. cit. Com 
ment. Praev.). The probable date, however, is the winter of 1217-18. We know 
that Cardinal Ugolino was in Rome at that time. Cf. Potthast, nos. 5G29 seq. 
A meeting between Francis and Dominic in 1216 is mentioned in Umbria 
Serafica, Miscell. Franc, n. p. 47 ; and by Galvagno de la Flamma in Man. 
Ord. FF. PP. vol. ii. fasc. i. p. 7. Concerning the meeting of the two saints 
at the Chapter of Mats in 1219, ride Acta SS. loc. cit. 

2 See the discourse of St. Francis on the virtues of Poverty in Fiorelti, 
cap. 12 ; Actus, cap. 13. 



186 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

will deny that both spirits are of the very essence of life itself, 
whether it be found in religion or elsewhere, and therefore at 
all times in potential harmony. Yet it is only in the more 
exalted natures that this harmony is realized. With lesser 
men differences of function can be thought of only as a con 
tradiction of principles ; and the potential harmony is buried 
in actual honest discord. 

In after times something of this discord actually showed 
itself in the relations between the disciples of Dominic and 
those of Francis ; though the greater spirits amongst them 
ever remembered the founders friendship and were true to 
it. 1 Historians of a certain type have made the most of 
those open antagonisms : though they were such as one 
might look for in dealing with the story of men. But what 
was of more serious moment was, not the pointed disputes 
which generally ended in further protestations of friendship, 
but the more or less unconscious spirit of rivalry, under 
which the names of religion often cloaked purely secular 
ambitions : as when Brother Elias divided the Franciscan 
Order into seventy-two provinces, professedly in honour of the 
seventy-two disciples of the Gospel, but really to gain a 
tactical advantage over the Dominicans, who had formed their 
order into twelve provinces in honour of the Apostles. 2 

These things did harm to the fraternities and might have 
been avoided. But further there was the inevitable influence 
which two bodies of men, brought into frequent alliance with 
each other and both standing near to the supreme authority 
in the Church, were bound to exercise upon each other s de 
velopment. This is not the place to discuss the points of 

1 Thus Thomas of Celano, after referring to the dissensions between the 
two fraternities, pleads for the wider charity of the founders II Celano, 149. 
In 1255 John of Parma and Humbert de Romanis, the two Superiors-General, 
issued a joint pastoral ordering the friars of the two orders to maintain peace 
and concord. Many instances might be cited from the chronicles of the time, 
showing the fraternal regard of the two fraternities for each other, side by 
side with instances of dissension : e.g. Eccleston relates not only the dispute 
of the two orders regarding novices (coll. xiv. ed. Little, p. 101-2) but also how 
on their arrival in London the Friars Minor were lodged by the Dominicans 
"as members of the family " (coll. n. pp. 11, 12). 

2 Eccleston, ed. Little/coll. ix. p. 54. 



FKANCIS AT FOUBTH LATEEAN COUNCIL 187 

detail in which either fraternity borrowed from the other in 
organization and mental outlook. Some say that Dominic 
borrowed from Francis the rule of mendicancy which he im 
posed on his brethren ; it seems certain that the example of 
the Dominicans led to the first formation of theological 
studies amongst the Friars Minor. Here, however, we only 
refer to these matters, which belong to the later history of 
Francis and his fraternity, as showing how events which 
happened during the Lateran Council, were the seeds of much 
that occurred in the further unfolding of Franciscan story. 
The destiny of the fraternity was being shaped, not merely 
by the inspiration of Francis, but by its alliance with the 
world-forces upon which the Catholic world was being carried 
forward in the hot rush of a fully awakened life. 






w 

uska 







CHAPTEK VII. 
THE PORZIUNCOLA INDULGENCE. 

WHEN Francis again turned his steps towards Umbria, it was 
with a vast pity for the world upon which the judgment of 
the Church was to fall. That passion for souls which had 
been with him since his first call to the apostolate, had be 
come a throbbing pain. From all his preaching tours he had 
come back to the Porziuncola, more solicitous to save the 
sinner and to bring all the earth to a knowledge of the joy to 
be had in the service of Christ. He found it hard to be 
lieve that the greatest sinner would not repent bitterly of his 
wrong-doing and become a true follower of the Gospel, did 
he but know the beauty of the law of Christ and his own loss 
in ignoring it. 1 And how he yearned to see the whole earth 
bound in fealty and comradeship with the Incarnate God, and 
the unnatural divorce ended which kept them apart ! 

More and more as the years went on, the image of the 
Divine Master to whom he had given his worship, came to dif 
fuse itself through all his vision. Nothing met his eye but what 
in some direct way carried his thoughts to his Lord : a lamb 
being led to the market made him think of Jesus Christ in 
the hands of His executioners ; in the leper he saw Him 
marked with the guilt which was not His own ; every babe 
took him in spirit to Bethlehem ; the worm crawling on the 
ground spoke to him of his Lord s humiliation ; flowers 
with their sweetness of colour and scent, reminded him of the 
sweetness of the life with Christ; a burning lamp, of the 
heavenly Light which came to men : Christ the Rock, the 
sure foundation of the Christian s hope, stood before him in 
mind whenever he came to a rocky ground. 2 

1 Cf . II Celano, 133. 

2 Cf. I Celano, 77-81 ; II Celano, 165; Spec. Perfect. 11G-18. 
188 



THE POKZIUNCOLA INDULGENCE 189 

And these things of earth were not mere arbitrary sym 
bols of Him he loved. In them he felt that the Christ-life 
was really adumbrated and in some sense lived, as the artist s 
life in the work of his hands. All suffering, he believed, was 
in a mysterious fashion allied with the suffering of Christ ; all 
rightful joy, with His joy ; all life with His life. 

A theologian might explain this by saying that all created 
things are made after the image of the Eternal Word of God 
which Christ is in His Divinity ; and that in His Humanity 
Christ adopted the created life into His own greater inherit 
ance. But Francis was not a theologian : he uttered his 
beliefs as they inspired him, without inquiring for logical 
expositions ; and most frequently the utterance was not in 
words but in a mental attitude or the heart s emotion. But 
did you ask him why he delighted in earth and sky, he would 
tell you, because they revealed to him the Creator who made 
them ; l did you ask why he reverenced the poor man begging 
by the wayside, he would say : " Brother, when you see a 
poor man you have set before you a mirror of the Lord and 
His poor mother ". Or as regarding the sick : " In the sick 
you see the infirmities which He took upon Himself for our 
sake ". 2 But he could never serve the poor or sick without 
feeling that he was serving his Lord in their persons : in 
their service he sought His Master. 3 

This same worshipful tenderness showed itself in other 
ways. He would never allow the brethren to uproot a tree or 
to cut it down in such wise that it could not grow again ; nor 
would he allow them so to enclose a garden that the flowers 
and growing things, could not spread out in their natural 
freedom. He would take up the worms and slow moving 
insects from the road where they might be crushed under foot 
and put them in safety. In a hard frost he was known to 
put sweet wine and honey near the bees that they might not 
die of hunger. 4 All life to him was sacred, because it came 
from the Hand of God. 

His boundless pity for the sinner was fed by this same 

1 1 Celano, 80 seq. 2 II Celano, 85. 

3 !&*., 90. *Ibid., 165. 



190 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

reverence. For no matter how sinful a man might be, he 
was of the flesh and blood and humanity which Christ had 
fashioned and taken to Himself. His very jealousy for the 
sovereignty of the Eedecmer made him wistful for the salva 
tion of the redeemed. He could not honour his Divine 
Lord and yet not honour the latent Christ-life he saw in his 
Lord s possible disciples : and beyond the guiltiness of the 
sinner he always saw that nobility : whence came in part 
his unconquerable hopefulness in dealing with the wrong 
doer. And to this faith of his were due many miracles of 
unlikely conversions. Men accustomed to be judged solely 
by the evil they had done and holding themselves, despairingly 
or cynically, damned by such judgment, were subdued by this 
new standard of judgment. Incredulously at first they would 
listen to an appeal which assumed that they were not wholly 
evil but capable of much good. They were softened and 
grew shy when this saint, as they held him, took for granted 
the better nature in which they themselves hardly ventured 
to believe : until gradually they began to believe in his belief, 
and that for some was the beginning of a life of heroic en 
deavour to become what Francis bade them become : as 
happened with a band of robbers at Monte Casale in the 
mountains behind Borgo San Sepolcro. For some of the 
brethren who lived in a hermitage there, were ruthless in 
their opinion of the robbers and regarded them as wholly 
lost to all grace. But Francis would not have it so. He told 
the brethren to invite the robbers to the hermitage and first 
satisfy their hunger with good bread and wine ; and when 
they were no longer hungry, to speak to them of the love of 
God. Finding that the robbers were not at once converted, he 
bade the brethren invite them again but to a more sumptuous 
banquet of eggs and cheese ; and then again to set before the 
robbers the advantages of a good life and to appeal to them 
to do penance and live honestly. The robbers were won by 
the brotherliness of the appeal, and began to bring firewood 
from the woods for the brethren s use in return for the food 
they received at the hermitage. Finally they all vowed to 
live honestly by the labour of their hands for the future, and 



THE POEZIUNCOLA INDULGENCE 191 

three of them asked to be admitted to the fraternity and were 
gladly welcomed by Francis ; and in the end these became 
most saintly men. 1 Indeed not a few of the brethren had 
thus been won over from utter worldliness or sinfulness, by the 
tenderness born of his reverence with which Francis dealt 
with them, at the outstart. 

But if his faith in the latent goodness of human nature, 
worked miracles of conversion, it also accounted much for the 
sorrow with which the world s sin at times overwhelmed him. 
Had his vision of the latent godliness which is in man, been less 
constant and clear, he would have grieved less over the sinner : 
sin would have been less of an outrage upon God s creating 
and redeeming love ; less of a loss to man. As it was, the 
sorrow of Christ had come upon him and was to work his 
martyrdom in the end. 

And now we must relate how this pity for his fellow-men 
led Francis to seek from the Pope an amazing privilege, as it 
was thought in those days, namely the great indulgence of 
the Porziuncola. The incident has this curious feature at 
tached to it, that for half a century after the death of Francis 
this indulgence, which was eventually to rank the Porziuncola 
as one of the four chief shrines of Christendom, was fenced 
about with a singular silence on the part of the official bio 
graphers of the saint and is not mentioned by any chronicler 
of the time. And for that reason some have denied that it is 
authentically a part of Francis story. Yet though the first 
written witness to the indulgence was made some sixty years 
after the favour was granted but, be it remembered, within 
the memory of Francis contemporaries ; and though even 
that same written witness has given legitimate grounds for 
discussion as to its reliability nevertheless for reasons which 
will be given elsewhere in this book, 2 I for my part hold that 
the story as here given is authentic, and moreover I will sug 
gest how that indulgence came to be asked for, and why for 
so many years it was guarded with silence. 

And first, for the authentic story. One night in the 

1 Spec. Perfect, cap. 66 ; Fioretti, cap. 25 ; Actm, cap. 29. 

2 Vide Appendix II, p. 404 seq. 



192 LIFE OF ST. FRANCIS OF ASSIST 

summer of 1216, x Francis rose from his bed, whilst yet the 
other brothers were sleeping, and went into the chapel of the 
Porziuncola to pray, and as he prayed the Divine Presence 
manifested itself to him, and in vision he beheld Jesus Christ 
Who bade him go to the Pope and ask that whosoever should 
visit the church of the Porziuncola, being truly contrite of heart 
and having already confessed his sins, should receive a plenary 
indulgence, that is, be freed from all temporal punishment 
due to sin. 2 Francis in his wonted fashion made no delay in 
fulfilling the Divine Will, but at early dawn called Brother 
Masseo and with him set out for Perugia to seek the Sovereign 
Pontiff. Now, whether this journey was undertaken before 
the death of Innocent III we cannot say. But Francis was 
present when Innocent died at Perugia on 16 July, and he 
was one of the few who remained by the side of the Pontiff 
in his last moments, when most of the attendants fled away 
in terror of disease and death. 3 

In any case, however, it was to Pope Honorius III that 
Francis actually made his petition. Honorius, who was 
elected two days after Innocent s death, was a man of an un 
worldly mind and simple habits, careless about wealth and 
generous to the poor. " Holy Father," said Francis, coming 
into the Papal presence, " but a little while past I restored 
for you 4 a church in honour of the Virgin Mother of Christ, 

1 The date of the incident is fixed by the attestation of Benedict of Arezzo 
that Pope Honorius III was at Perugia when Francis obtained the indulgence. 
But Honorius was at Perugia certainly from the date of his election, 18 July 
until the winter of 1216. Nor is there any indication of his being again there 
during his pontificate, though Wadding asserts that he passed through Perugia 
on his way to Bologna in October, 1221. But Wadding s evidence at this point 
is self -contradictory, since he says Francis was accompanied by Peter Cathanii, 
who in fact died in the preceding March. 

2 The reader not acquainted with Catholic teaching must understand that 
an "indulgence" does not mean a pardon of the guilt of sin but a release 
from the temporal punishment which still remains due as an expiation even 
after the guilt is forgiven. No "indulgence" can be gained until after the 
guilt has been wiped out by true contrition. 

3 Eccleston [ed. Little], col. xv. p. 119. 

4 The phrase " I restored for you " is curious. It may mean that Francis 
would not claim any rights whatever in the church he had restored : it be 
longed to the Church inasmuch as it was dedicated to divine service, and to 
the Benedictines as trustees for the Church. Or the words may refer to the 



THE POKZIUNCOLA INDULGENCE 193 

and I beseech your holiness that you bestow upon it an in 
dulgence without any oblation." The Pope replied that an 
indulgence without an oblation attached to it, could not well 
be granted, since it was fitting that those who sought such 
a favour, should make some sacrifice and put forth a helping 
hand to gain it. Yet he would know for how many years 
Francis desired the indulgence to be granted whether it was 
to continue for one year or three years or seven ; also, how 
much of an indulgence he sought. Francis pleaded : " Holy 
Father, may it please your holiness to grant not years but 
souls ". Something in the heart of the unworldly Pontiff 
bade him ask: "How would you have souls?" Francis 
made reply: "If it please your holiness, I would that whoso 
ever should come to this church, confessed and contrite and 
absolved by a priest, should be freed from all guilt and 
penalty both in heaven and on earth, from the day of their 
baptism till the hour of their entry into this church ". "It 
is much that you ask," said the Pope, " and it is not the cus 
tom of the Eoman Church to grant such an indulgence." 
" My lord," came the instant reply, " what I ask is not from 
myself but from Him Who sent me, the Lord Jesus Christ." 
Honorius, as we have said, was an unworldly man : and so 
Francis simple faith won the day against the dictates of offi 
cial prudence. " It is my will that you have what you seek," 
said the Pontiff : and he repeated the words twice over. But 
at this some cardinals, who were present, intervened. The 
grant of such an indulgence would make the indulgences of 
the Crusades, and of the Tombs of the Apostles, valueless in 
the eyes of the people, and they urged the Pope to recall his 
words. But Honorius would not go back on his word : only 
in deference to the cardinals he would restrict the indulgence 
to one day in the year, namely the dedication day of the 
Church : for it was now determined that the church should 
be rightly consecrated and the consecration was fixed for the 
day following the feast of St. Peter s Chains. 1 Francis pleaded 

coining consecration of the church, which would make it in a special sense the 
property of the Church. 

1 It is uncertain whether the consecration of the chapel had been already 

13 



194 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSISI 

that the indulgence should continue at least during the octave 
of the festival : but to this the Pope would not consent : 
what he had already granted was in the face of the opposi 
tion of his counsellors ; he would not grant more. Francis 
bowed to this decision and was turning away to leave the 
papal presence, when the Pope called to him : " Simpleton 
that you are, where are you going ? what have you to show 
that this indulgence has been granted you ? " " Holy Father," 
replied Francis, " your word is sufficient for me. If this is 
the work of God it is for Him to make His work manifest. 
I desire no other document : but the Blessed Virgin Mary 
shall be the charter and Christ the notary ; and the angels 
shall be the witnesses." 

So saying, he withdrew and at once took his way back to 
Assisi. But his spirit was troubled nevertheless at finding 
himself a centre of contention amongst the rulers of the 
Church. He had gone to the Pope, thinking only of the 
harvest of poor souls which this indulgence would reap. 
He had not thought, in his simplicity, that any contention 
could arise concerning it : and now the cardinals were in 
protest and the Pope himself was evidently timorous of his 
own act. By noon he and Masseo reached the leper hospital 
about midway between Perugia and Assisi ; and here they 
sought food and rest. Fatigued with the hot journey, Francis 
fell asleep. When he awoke he spent some little time in 
prayer ; and then he called Brother Masseo and said to 
him : " Brother Masseo, I tell thee on the part of God that 
the indulgence which has been granted me by the Sovereign 
Pontiff, has been confirmed in heaven " : and with that as 
surance in his soul, Francis went forward again, all content. 

The consecration of the little church was duly made, 
seven bishops taking part in the ceremony. Francis preached 
from a wooden pulpit erected outside the church, and an- 

determined upon before Francis came to Perugia or whether it was now de 
termined upon in consequence of the grant of the indulgence. The feast of 
St. Peter s Chains is on 1 August. The consecration, therefore, was to take 
place on 2 August. According to Blessed Francis of Fabriano, the consecration 
actually took place on 2 August, 1216 (Bartholi, Tract de Indulg. ed. Saba- 
tier, p. Ixix). 



THE POBZIUNCOLA INDULGENCE 195 

nounced the indulgence. ".I want to send you all to Para 
dise," he said, " and I announce to you an indulgence I have 
received from the lips of the Sovereign Pontiff. And all you 
who have come here to-day and all who shall come each year 
on this day, with a good and contrite heart, shall have an 
indulgence of all their sins. I wanted it for eight days but I 
could not get it." l But beyond this announcement Francis 
took no further heed to make the indulgence generally known. 
He had cast it upon the world in obedience to the Divine 
command : for the rest he left it in God s Hands to manifest 
His work as He willed. In time the opposition of the cardi 
nals would die away : meanwhile the brethren must avoid 
any appearance of strife with the pastors of the Church : 
more surely would the good-will of the clergy be won by 
meekness and more good accrue to the souls of men. 2 And 
so he bade the brethren not to preach this indulgence to 
the world yet awhile but to wait upon the Will of God. 3 

It was many years before the brethren ventured to pro 
claim the indulgence far and wide, but in Umbria the story 
was told by those who had been present at the consecration 
of the little church ; and amongst their friends the brethren 
did not conceal a privilege which crowned with a new sanct 
ity the place already so holy in their eyes. The pilgrims 
visiting the Church on the annual festival day of its dedica 
tion confessed their sins and within its walls prayed for that 
fuller pardon which Francis had obtained for them. 

During the half-century that followed the granting of 
the indulgence it seemed as though the time for its wider 
promulgation would never come. The Pope and the cardinals 
were making every effort to induce the Christian nations to 

1 Of. Pet. Zalfani s witness in Barfcholi, op. cit. p. 54. Zalfaiii was present 
at the consecration. He was a patrician of Assisi and supported the Pope 
in the struggle with Frederick II, and assisted at the canonization of St. 
Stanislaus in 1253 in the basilica of San Francesco. Cf. Miscell. Franc, vol. 
x. p. 75. 

2 Cf. II Celano, 146: " Scitote, inquit, fratres, animarum fructum Deo 
gratissimum esse meliusque ilium consequi posse pace, quam disco* " .ia cleri- 
corum ". 

3 Vide attestation of Giacomo Coppoli in Bartholi, op. cit. p. 52. 

13* 



196 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSIST 

carry out the crusade, and chief amongst the inducements 
were the indulgences attached to the taking of the Cross and 
to the fitting out of the crusading army in the case of those 
who could not take part in the crusade themselves. The 
time was inopportune for the proclaiming of any new indul 
gence which might attract the attention of the people away 
from the urgent necessities of the Holy Land. And then, 
too, amongst the brethren who came after Francis, there were 
some who would readily have sided with the protesting 
cardinals and clergy in this matter. For during this period 
of which we are speaking, the Friars Minor together with 
the Friars Preachers, were the accredited agents of the Holy 
See in fostering the crusade and collecting the funds for it. 1 

Thus it happened that Francis dream of a great pardon 
for all contrite sinners, was for many years unfulfilled save for 
the pilgrims who visited the Porziuncola from the near neigh 
bourhood. But in spite of the discretion of the brethren the 
annual pilgrimage survived and grew in numbers. Before 
the end of the century, crowds from all parts of Italy flocked 
every year on the dedication-festival to the Porziuncola in the 
hope of pardon : nor has the flow of pilgrims ceased in all the 
centuries since. And not only from Italy have the pilgrims 
come ; but from all nations of the Christian world. Surely 
in this matter Francis faith and meekness have been 
abundantly justified. 

Now let me tell you how it was, as I think, that Francis 
came to ask for this indulgence. It was in truth the immedi 
ate outcome of that vast pity for the world in which his 
spirit had been steeped at the time of the General Council. 
He had gone forth from the Council with the Pope s pro 
clamation of judgment and mercy sounding in his ears and 
vibrating in his heart. He had taken to himself that symbol 
of the renewed life in Christ, the Thau, with which he would 
mark, if men were willing, all the earth. And yet his mission 

l "Ex Us qui religionem sanctorum Dominici et Francisci professi erant 
plurimos [Gregorius] emisit qui per totam Europam Christianas ad bellum 
Saracenis inferendum ad hortarentur" (Vita Gregorii IX in Conciliorum 
[Parisiis, 1644], torn, xxvin. p. 273.) The friars " Pardoners " became a feature 
of the ecclesiastical system under Gregory IX and his succesaors. 



THE POBZIUNCOLA INDULGENCE 197 

would be in some way incomplete unless he could bring to 
those who received the Thau, that full pardon from penalty 
and guilt which the Pontiff had solemnly granted to those 
who took part in the crusade either personally or by proxy. 1 
For many could never avail themselves of the proffered par 
don. Francis found himself yearning for a more generous 
extension of the indulgence. True, one might gain it not only 
by going oneself on the crusade but by giving an alms in its 
support. But there were the poor who had no alms to give. 
And somehow that condition of alms meaning money-offer 
ings right as it was in itself, placed the indulgence outside 
the domain of that poverty which Christ Himself loved. To 
exclude the poor from a full share in the mercy of the Church 
in this time of judgment, seemed an injury to the poor Christ. 
And then it was that Francis saw in the church of the Porzi- 
uncola which Christ and His blessed Mother had given to the 
Lady Poverty as her own sanctuary, the fitting shrine for 
this extended favour. 

That little church had become to him in very truth another 
holy place : was it not beckoning forward that spiritual 
crusade for which the Pontiff pleaded as a condition of the 
release of the Holy Land ? And was it not the nursing- 
mother of that new life which the brethren were to spread 
through the world ? The intensity of the thought kept him 
much at the Porziuncola during these days ; 2 it knit his soul 
in a closer mystic communing with this place of his love ; it 
was the subject of his prayer. And then came the vision and 
response to his prayer and his appeal to the Pope. 

1 Labbseus, torn. xxn. pp. 955-60. 

2 Papini says St. Francis evangelized Terra di Lavoro, the Abruzzi and 
Apulia before returning to Assisi. But if Mgr. Faloci Pulignani and Mr. 
Montgomery Garmichacl are riglit in their judgment (and I see no reason to 
doubt it) Francis about this time repaired the church of Sta. Maria Maggiore 
in Assisi. Cf. Miscell. Franc, vol. n. pp. 33-7 ; Franciscan Annals, February, 
1900. 



BOOK III. 

CHAPTEK I. 

A NEW PHASE OPENS IN THE LIFE OF THE 
FRATERNITY. 

THE reader who has attentively followed the course of this 
history, must have felt that sooner or later the time would 
come when the simple faith of the brethren in the ruling of 
Francis would be put to the test. Scattered throughout 
many provinces and brought frequently into contact with all 
conditions of men and the actual facts of the world, they 
will hardly in the ordinary way of things remain secluded 
in their exalted idealism and simplicity. 

For one thing the life of Friar Minor touched the world 
at too many points, to remain untouched by it. 

The vocation of the fraternity was not merely a negation 
or judgment of the world s life ; not even mainly so. It stood 
indeed in direct contradiction with the actual world on many 
matters of vital interest, as in its renunciation of property 
and its policy of peace ; but the fraternity itself was borne in 
its birth and progress, upon the wings of that surgent aspira 
tion which in matters spiritual and secular was rending 
the old order and bringing in the new ; and it was as a 
directive rather than as a negative spirit that it entered into 
the world. In Francis the new romantic temper of the age, 
voiced by troubadour and crusader, was joyously carried into 
the service of religion and shot through and through with 
spiritual values. The fraternity could not escape its birth 
and affinities. 1 It was in truth a product of the Time-spirit 

1 Of. The Friars and how they came to England, by the present writer, In 
troductory Essay, p. 13 seq. 

198 



A NEW PHASE IN LIFE OF FEATEENITY 199 

and had therefore a natural relationship with all the seething 
world in which the Time-spirit could claim a parental right. 
That, together with the striking personality of Francis, is the 
explanation of the wonderful influence and immediate success 
of the movement ; that too accounts for much of the trouble 
which is shortly to enter in amongst the brethren and bring 
bitter sorrow to the heart of Francis. 

On the face of things the trouble began in the endeavour 
to give the fraternity a more definite organization. Until now 
it might be said that Francis was not merely the leader of the 
brethren but their law. They might not all imitate him in 
every detail of his daily life as did Brother John the Simple, 
who went so far as to kneel when Francis knelt and to cough 
when he coughed ; l but in the more intimate concerns of their 
vocation they looked to him as their book of life. Without 
any exaggeration it might be said that the fraternity lived in 
Francis and saw the world through his interpretation of it : 
so the brethren came to appreciate poverty and song, the 
service of love and suffering. Until now they were un 
troubled by any obtrusive question as to their relationship 
with the world which lay outside the life of the Porziuncola 
which Francis had fashioned there. The atmosphere of that 
life they carried with them, however distant they might 
travel : it was their conventual grille through which they 
conversed with the world at large. They still believed in the 
all-sufficiency of divine faith and love to win the world to 
Christ : they did not trouble about the human means. And 
in truth the human means which they had, their own fervent 
speech and persuasive sympathies and their hard laborious 
lives, were effective enough for the purpose Francis had 
actually set before them. 

Nevertheless, from the moment that Francis had sent the 
brethren forth to win the world to Christ, and had thrown 
the fraternity wide open to admit all sorts and conditions of 
men, the troublous problem of the relationship of the brethren 
with the outer world was latent, only waiting for circum 
stances to reveal it. A world-wide society cannot be 
1 Cf. II Celano, 190 ; Spec. Perfect, cap. 57. 



200 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSIST 

governed and led by a simple and immediate dependence 
upon a single personality : of necessity a system of govern 
ment must grow up which will stand, if not between the 
founder s personality and his disciples, at least as the more 
immediate rule to which both founder and disciple must sub 
mit. The fraternity will then develop a corporate conscious 
ness in some way distinct from the personal consciousness 
of the founder : it will become impressionable to views other 
than those which commend themselves to him ; it may even 
find itself thinking in contradiction against him. Sometimes 
behind the immediate contradiction there will be a real agree 
ment of purpose ; sometimes not. These divergences of view 
may result from the intrusions into the fraternity, of elements 
foreign to its own proper spirit and purpose and the essential 
mind of the founder ; they may also arise from a mere exten 
sion of purpose beyond that of which the founder himself is 
explicitly conscious, but which is inherent in the vocation 
itself of the brethren. 

Once, then, the fraternity is spread far and wide and 
become less immediately dependent on the personality of 
Francis, such vexing problems are sure to arise ; the more 
surely because the origins of the fraternity are, as we have 
said, in the spirit of the age itself even more truly than in the 
person of its founder. Thus as this story proceeds we shall 
find the fraternity troubled as to its proper relationship with 
the intellectul life of the time ; and troubles will arise too 
in regard to its co-ordination with other elements in the 
common life of the Catholic Church, with established tradi 
tions, papal policy and such like. In all these matters lie pit 
falls for the weak and unsteady, and the foreboding of sorrow. 

The General Chapter of 1217 marks the parting of the 
ways in the development of the fraternity. Not that this 
Chapter had to determine any of the difficult questions which 
were so soon to cause trouble, but because the policy of ex 
pansion and organization therein initiated, inevitably led to 
a loosening of the close intimacy between the brethren and 
Francis and to a weakening of their sense of immediate 
dependence upon him. 



A NEW PHASE IN LIFE OF FEATEENITY 201 

The Chapter assembled at Whitsuntide. Easter that year 
had fallen in the very first of the spring days and so the Pente 
cost festival came early before the hot sun had spoilt the 
freshness of tree and soil. 1 

From all the "places" and hermitages of the Order 
brethren came, many of them newly-received novices who 
had not yet looked upon the face of Francis. 2 They came 
from Lombardy and Apulia, from Terra di Lavoro and the 
mountains overlooking the Adriatic, in fact from every Italian 
province. For many of them it was a home-coming ; they 
knew the Porziuncola and loved the shade of its surrounding 
wood where they had prayed and felt the stirrings of the 
heavenly life which nowhere seemed so near and so real as 
in the silences of that holy place. And to the novices and 
those who had not yet been there, it was the turning of their 
faces towards the Holy Zion from the captivity in which they 
had been born. The glory of their vocation was still alto 
gether gathered up in Francis and the wattle huts near Assisi. 
As the brethren met and welcomed each other their tongues 
betrayed their origin or up-bringing. Some spoke with their 
native grace of noble birth ; others with the acquired distinc 
tion gained in the schools ; whilst others had only the art of 
speech which they had learned toiling for daily bread. The 
soft sibilant utterance of Umbria mingled with the guttural 
dialects of Lombardy and the strident tones of the South. 
But here and there was a brother whose words bespoke a 
comer from beyond the Alps ; one who passing through Italy, 
had met the brethren and joined their ranks : but as yet the 
ultramontane brethren were but a handful. 

Assembled at the Porziuncola, they gathered together in 
groups and built for themselves huts of branches of trees, 
which they collected in the woods around. Though they 
were an assembly of many hundreds, no distracting noise was 
allowed in the neighbourhood of the holy chapel, and no loud 

1 In 1217 Pentecost fell on 14 May. 

2 At the early Chapters all the brethren, whether professed or novices, 
might attend. Of. Cliron. Jordani in Anal. Franc, i. p. 6; Eccleston [ed. 
Little], p. 80. 



202 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSIST 

voice save that of the brother told off to preach. As a rule 
the brethren must speak in low tones and only when necessary 
or when they met in small companies to converse on spiritual 
matters or the affairs of their vocation. 1 But the silence was 
eloquent with the feeling of life as is the silence of the spring 
time in the fields. 

It was a silent uncontentious parliament if you will ; yet a 
true parliament, for every brother, even the youngest novice, 
might proffer an opinion and would be respectfully listened 
to. The Chapter was not a mere parade but a deliberative 
assembly. They gathered together to learn in prayer and 
mutual intercourse the Divine Will concerning them : each 
must speak as his conscience impelled him ; but none thought 
to dictate to the others or to impose his own opinion. About 
the ultimate decisions of the Chapter they had little anxiety : 
these would be as God willed. For the multitude of the 
brethren were still living by faith and joyous in the vocation 
they had found. 

Doubtless amongst so many there were some already in 
clined to criticize the simplicity of the fraternity ; men trained 
in the assertive knowledge of the schools, in decretals and 
jurisprudence ; or accustomed to handle affairs in the world 
and not forgetful of their experience : but their criticism was 
held in check by the triumphant faith and devotion to their 
leader which swayed the gathering. 

Two matters had been set down for prayer and considera 
tion : the appointment of Provincial ministers and the send 
ing of brethren to establish the fraternity in the countries 
outside the Italian peninsula. The second proposal merely 
signified an extension of the active apostolate of the fraternity, 
but it rendered more urgently necessary the more systematic 
organization of the fraternity implied in the appointment of 
the Provincial ministers. 

It would be difficult in any organized system of govern 
ment to maintain the pristine simplicity which until now 
had characterized the relations of the brethren with their 
superiors. The rule of the fraternity was that whenever a 

1 Cf. Spec. Perfect, cap. 82 ; Actus, cap. 20. 



A NEW PHASE IN LIFE OF FEATEKNITY 203 

number of brethren were living together or travelling on a 
journey, one of them was chosen whom the others were to 
regard as God s Vicar, 1 and to whom they must render 
obedience. But the conception of authority and obedience 
as between the brethren, was of that pervading yet easy 
character which holds in a family or company closely knit 
by mutual regard and established in one mind and purpose ; 
where too the burdens of authority and obedience are felt 
lightly because they are borne at the same time by the entire 
body. Francis idea of the function of a superior in the 
fraternity was that of a mother tending her household : it 
was the antithesis of the idea of lordship. 2 Jesus Christ 
only could claim that function amongst the brethren ; His 
word as set forth in the Rule and in the common law of 
the Church, was the only absolute law ; and to this all the 
brethren were equally subject. But the superior had the care 
of the brethren in the observing of this law : he would in 
terpret to them the Will of Christ in its application to the 
details of daily life, yet not in the spirit of a personal domin 
ance which did not belong to him, but as one administering 
the law to which he, as well as others, were immediately 
bound. 

Hence he must regard himself as the servant of the fra 
ternity and himself set the example of that "true and holy 
obedience " which consists in " voluntary and mutual service 
and subjection ". For the motive of this obedience is charity, 
the love of Christ and of the brotherhood for Christ s sake ; 
and it is the charity which induces a man to serve another 
willingly even in the most menial acts. 3 This "true and 

1 Cf. 3 Soc. 46. 

2 Thus Celano says of Francis and Brother Elias : "quern loco matris 
elegerat sibi" (I Celano, 98). See also the description of Bro. Pacifico, by 
Bro. Thomas of Tuscany in Mon. Germ. Hist. Script, xxn. p. 492 : " Prater 
Pacificus . . . ut a beato Francisco pia mater appellaretur ". The idea is also 
explicitly set forth in that interesting document, " De religiosa habitation* in 
eremo " (Opuscula, pp. 83-4). The same conception underlies the title bestowed 
upon the local superiors who were styled custodes, wardens or guardians and 
not priors or masters as in other religious communities. 

3 " Per caritatem spiritus voluntarie scrviant et obediant invicem. Et licec 
est vera et sancta obedientia Domini nostri Jesu Christi " (Reg. i. cap. v.). 



204 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

holy obedience " was binding equally upon him who held the 
office of superior as upon all the brethren : it was part of the 
fealty which the fraternity owed to Him Who " is not come 
to be ministered unto but to minister". 1 Authority thus ex 
pressed in a service of love and estranged from any thought 
of personal predominance, was received with exalted reverence 
as the authority of the divinely-humble Christ Himself and 
worshipfully obeyed. Criticism of a superior s judgment was 
felt to be a disloyalty to the vocation itself. The brethren 
would obey the known wish of the superior even though he 
did not impose it : 2 but the motive was loyalty to the Lord 
Whom they had vowed to follow ; they obeyed Christ in the 
superior. 3 And this high obedience was the more easily given 
when authority itself bore the marks of Christ s meek service. 

Francis idea of obedience was in truth drawn from the 
romance of chivalry ; it was the knightly fealty and service 
and not the servile submission of the legists. 

But this chivalric conception of obedience demands an 
initial condition of liberty of soul-liberty even more than 
political or economic and a constant loyalty, not easily 
maintained in ,a wide and numerous body of men: it soon 
needs the support of that more impersonal and coercive law 
upon which states are built. The organization of the frater 
nity into provinces under Provincial ministers was due not 
merely to the extension of the Order : it was the expression 
of the need, beginning to be felt, of a more systematic organi 
zation and more impersonal objective government. Highly 
sensitive as he was, Francis knew that with the appointment 
of Provincial ministers, something of the simple fraternal life 
of his " knights of the Bound Table " 4 must go : yet he was 

" Et nullus vocetur prior sect generaliter omnes vocentur fratres minores. Et 
alter alterius lavet pedes (ibid. cap. vi. Cf. Regula n. cap. x.). 

1 Matthew xx. 28 (Vulgate) quoted in Reg. I. cap. iv. Hence the superior 
was bound in virtue of this obedience to share the hardships of the brethren. 
See infra, Francis discourse to the friars. 

2 Cf. 3 Soc. 42. 

3 Cf . II Celano, 151 : " Subditus, inqitit, prc&latum suum non hominem 
considerare debet, sed ilium pro cujus amore est subjectus ". 

4 Spec. Perfect, cap. 72. 



A NEW PHASE IN LIFE OF FKATEBNITY 205 

intently anxious that the primitive character of the fraternity 
should still maintain itself within the more legal bonds. The 
superiors must still be ministers and custodes, not priors or 
masters. In promulgating the decision of the Chapter, he thus 
pleadingly described their office and duty : " The ministers 
must be the servants of the other brethren and tend them as 
a shepherd tends his sheep, often visiting them and spiritually 
instructing and encouraging them. The other brethren on 
their part must obey the minister in all things which are not 
contrary to the life of a Friar Minor. 

"And between the ministers and the brethren there shall 
be this rule of conduct : Whatsoever ye will that men 
should do unto you, that do ye to them ; and again this : 
what thou wouldst not have done unto thyself, do it not 
unto another . And let the minister-servants remember 
what the Lord says : I came not to be ministered unto but 
to minister ; and that to them is committed the care of the 
souls of the brethren, and should anyone be lost through the 
minister s fault and bad example, that minister will have to 
render an account before our Lord Jesus Christ V l 

Thus was the office of Provincial minister established arid 
denned. 

The provinces were divided according to established geo 
graphical boundaries : thus in Italy there were provinces of 
Umbria, Tuscany, the Marches of Ancona, Lombardy, Terra 
di Lavoro, Apulia, and Calabria. A certain liberty of choice 
was given to the brethren as to the province they would join ; 
but generally the brethren preferred to leave themselves in 
the hands of the ministers. 2 But the stirring moment of the 
Chapter was when volunteers were called for, to undertake 
missions beyond the Alps. Probably few amongst the 
brethren realized the importance of the institution of the 
ministers. But the missions beyond the Alps appealed to 
their imagination. True, the countries designated, Spain 
and Portugal and France, Germany and Hungary (and, as 

1 Reg. i. cap. iv. 

3 Of. Chron. Jurdani in Anal. Franc, i. no. 18, p. 7, also the case of St. 
Anthony of Padua at the Chapter of 1221, infra, p. 303. 



206 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSISI 

some say, Syria l ) were all Catholic countries ; but the people 
were strange, speaking unknown tongues. Few of the 
brethren had travelled far beyond their native Italian pro 
vince, and the countries beyond the Alps were to them the 
land of echo. The chosen bands of missionaries were there 
fore looked upon with something of awe and reverence. No 
one knew what hardships they might have to encounter. 

Not the least uplifted in spirit was Francis as he gazed 
upon these elect companions. To him it was a renewal of 
the joy of adventure he had felt in the first days of his own 
missionary journeys. Nor could he long resist the call their 
hardihood made to him. Taking aside some of the brethren 
he addressed them : " My best beloved, it is but right that I 
should be a pattern and example to all the brethren. I have 
sent brethren into far-off parts to undergo much labour and 
shame and hunger and thirst and other necessities : it is only 
just therefore, and holy obedience requires, that I too go forth 
into some distant land ; and so will the brethren be en 
couraged to endure patiently their adversities, when they 
hear that I suffer the same. Go therefore and pray that the 
Lord may grant me to make choice of the province that shall 
be most to His praise and the profit of souls and the encour 
agement of the brethren." The brothers therefore went and 
prayed as he bade them. When they came back, Francis 
met them, his face lit up with expectant joy. " In the name 
of our Lord Jesus Christ and the glorious Virgin Mary and 
all the saints," he exclaimed, " I choose the province of 
France wherein is a Catholic people who more than all other 
Catholics manifest a special reverence towards the Body of 
Christ, which reverence is most pleasing to me. Wherefore 
will I most readily go amongst them." But it was not only 
as a land devoted to the Blessed Sacrament that Francis 
loved France, but as the land of courtesy and song ; and with 
his happy tact and sense of the harmony of things, he there- 

1 Syria in this case would mean that part which was within the Latin 
kingdom of Jerusalem and not the Mahomedan territories. Vide infra, 
p. 207 note 5. 

2 Spec. Perfect, cap. 65. 



A NEW PHASE IN LIFE OF FEATEKNITY 207 

fore chose as one of his companions on this mission, Brother 
Pacifico, the former " king of verses " or poet laureate. 1 

Some say that Bernard da Quintavalle was the leader of 
the mission to Spain. 2 The mission to Germany was under 
the direction of John of Penna not he of the beautiful 
visions, 3 but another from Penna in the Abruzzi, a skilful 
architect and engineer. 4 

So the Chapter broke up in a renewal of fervour and en 
thusiasm, because of this breaking of the new ground beyond 
the Alps ; and immediately afterwards the roads leading from 
the Porziuncola, were dotted with groups of friars making 
their way towards their various provinces. 5 

1 Cf. Leg. Maj. iv. 9. 

2 Cf. Umbria Serafica in Misc. Franc, n. p. 46. 3 Fioretti, cap. 44. 

4 Cf. Fra Egidio Giusti, 0. M. Convent : Chifu veramente U ArchiteUo della 
Basilica superiore di S. Francesco in Assisi ? (Assisi, 1909). 

5 In Series Provinciarum Ord. F.F. M.M., Anno 1217, a P. H. Golubovich, 
in Archivum Franc. Hist. Annus I. fasc. i. pp. 2-5 : the names of the Provinces 
and Ministers-Provincial are given after Wadding as follows : Tuscany, 
minister unknown ; Marches of Ancona, minister, Benedict of Arezzo ; Milan 
or Lombardy, minister, John of Strachia ; Terra di Lavore, minister, 
Augustine of Assisi ; Apulia, minister unknown ; Calabria, Daniel of Tus 
cany ; Germany, minister, John of Penna ; France, minister, Pacificus, 
"king of verses"; Provence, minister, John Bonelli ; Spain, minister, 
Bsrnard da Quintavalle (?) ; Syria, minister, Elias. The mission to Germany, 
however, proved a failure and the German Province was not really constituted 
till 1221 under the leadership of Caesar of Spires. On other points too this 
list is open to objection. 

The Chron. xxiv. Gen. places the institution of the province of Provence 
in 1219 (of. Anal. Franc, in. p. 10). It is doubtful too whether Bro. Elias 
was sent to Syria in 1217 or 1219. P. Golubovich s list is supported by 
Sabatier s edition of the Speculum Perfect, cap. 65, which says that at the 
Chapter of 1217 brethren were sent " ad quasdam provincias idtramarinas," 
but in the text of the Speculum edited by P. Lemmens, the reading is "ad 
quasdam provincias ultraniontanas" (ed. Lemmens, cap. 37). The 3 Soc. cap. 
16, says that the brethren at this Chapter were sent "per universas mundi pro 
vincias inquibus fides catholica colitur et scrvatur," but makes no mention of 
Syria. Giordano da Giano frankly confesses that he does not know whether 
Elias was sent to Syria in 1217 or 1219 (Chron. Jordani, in Anal. Franc, i. no. 
7, p. 3). Glassberger (Anal. Franc, n. p. 9) says that at this Chapter the 
friars were sent "fere per universas provincias orbis in quibus fides Catiiolica 
viget". 

The Leg. 3 Soc. and Glassberger s Chronicle, however, do not necessarily 
exclude Syria, since there was already a Latin kingdom of Jerusalem with 



208 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

But before they set out Francis had addressed them thus : 
" In the name of the Lord go forth two and two, taking the 
road in all humility and modesty and especially keeping 
silence from the dawn until the hour of terce ; pray to the 
Lord in your hearts and let no idle or useless word be spoken 
amongst you. For though you be walking abroad, neverthe 
less let your conduct be as humble and becoming as in a her 
mitage or cell. Indeed wherever we are or wherever we 
travel, we have always our cell with us. Brother Body is 
our cell and the soul is the hermit who dwells within to pray 
and meditate upon the Lord. Of little use is a cell made 
with hands if the soul is not at rest in its own cell." l With 
these words he sped them on their journey. 

These first missions beyond the Alps were, like all the 
early Franciscan missions, ventures of knightly faith and 
fealty, conceived in the purest spirit of chivalric loyalty and 
honour. The brethren were sent forth to bear witness to the 
faith that was in them ; their love of Christ and Poverty was 
to be their sustaining motive ; patience and endurance their 
glory. Theirs was a knightly adventure simply, and no 
affair of statecraft or cunning policy. The spirit in which the 
mission was undertaken, is happily set forth in a prose-poem 
which tells of an incident on the way. Francis, it says, when 
setting out on his journey to France, wished first to pay a 
visit to the tombs of the Apostles to commend this new ad 
venture to their protection. He took with him on this pil 
grimage, Brother Masseo. On the way they came to a small 
town and, being hungry, went into the town to beg a meal ; 
Francis taking one street and Masseo another. " Masseo 
being tall and comely in person, had good pieces of bread 
given him, large and many, and even entire loaves " ; but 
Francis, "because he was a man of mean appearance and 
small of stature and accounted a vile beggar by those who 
knew him not, received nothing but a few mouthfuls and 

many Catholic colonies established in Palestine : and the fact that the General 
Chapter whether of 1217 or 1219 established a Province of Syria, shows that 
Syria was not altogether considered a missionary region but part of the Catho 
lic world. 

1 Spec. Perfect, cap. 65. 



A NEW PHASE IN LIFE OF FEATEENITY 209 

crumbs of dry bread". "When they had begged enough, 
they went together to a place outside the town, where there 
was a fair fountain that they might eat ; and beside which 
was also a broad and convenient stone, on which each placed 
all the alms which he had begged. 

Francis, seeing that the pieces of bread which Brother 
Masseo had were larger and better than his own, had great 
joy and spoke thus : Brother Masseo, we are not worthy 
of so great a treasure . And as he repeated these words 
several times, Brother Masseo answered him : Father, how 
can this be called treasure, when we are in such poverty and 
lack the things of which we have need, we who have neither 
cloth nor knives nor plates nor porringer nor house nor table 
nor man servant nor maid servant . Then said St. Francis : 
And this is what I call a great treasure, that there is nothing 
here provided by human industry, but everything is provided 
by Divine Providence, as we may see manifestly in this bread 
which we have begged, in this stone which serves so beauti 
fully for our table, and in this so clear fountain ; and there 
fore I desire that we should pray to God, that he would cause 
holy Poverty which is a thing so noble that God Himself 
was made subject to it, to be loved by us with our whole 
heart . And when he had said these words and they had 
made their prayer and partaken for bodily refreshment of the 
pieces of bread and drunk of the water, they arose and went 
their way." This intimate communion with his Lady 
Poverty had set the heart of Francis in a spiritual rapture. 
After a time they came to a church. " Francis said to his 
companion : Let us go into this church and pray . And 
entering, St. Francis placed himself behind the altar and 
betook himself to prayer. And as he prayed he received 
from the Divine visitation such excessive fervour, which so 
vehemently inflamed his soul with the love of holy Poverty, 
that by the increased colour of his face and the unaccustomed 
opening of his lips it seemed as though he were breathing out 
flames of love. And coming thus all inflamed, to his com 
panion, he said to him : * Ah ! Ah ! Ah ! Brother Masseo, 
yield thyself to me . And he said this three times, and the 

14 



210 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSISI 

third time he lifted Brother Masseo by his breath into the air 
and threw him from him, to the distance of a long spear : 
which put Brother Masseo in great astonishment. Now 
afterwards, relating the matter to his companions, Brother 
Masseo said that during the time he was raised up and thrown 
forth by the breath which proceeded from St. Francis, he 
tasted such sweetness in his soul, and such consolation of the 
Holy Spirit, that in all his life he had never felt the like. 

"And this done, St. Francis said to him : My Brother, 
let us go to St. Peter and St. Paul and pray them to teach 
us, and to give us to possess the immeasurable treasure of 
holy Poverty, inasmuch as it is a treasure so exalted, and so 
divine, that we are not worthy to possess it in our vile bodies, 
seeing that this is that celestial virtue by which all earthly 
and transitory things are trodden under foot and all impedi 
ments are lifted away from the soul, so that she can freely 
unite herself to the Eternal God. And this is the virtue 
which makes the soul, while still retained on earth, converse 
with the angels in heaven, and this it is which accompanied 
Christ to His Cross, with Christ was buried, with Christ was 
raised up, with Christ ascended into heaven, which, being 
given in this life to the souls who are enamoured of it, facili 
tates their flight to heaven, seeing that it guards the arms of 
true humility and charity. And therefore let us pray the 
most holy Apostles of Christ, who were perfect lovers of this 
pearl of the Gospel of Christ, that they will beg for us this 
grace from our Lord Jesus Christ, that by His most holy 
mercy, He would grant us to be true lovers, observers and 
humble disciples of this most gracious, most lovable, evan 
gelical Poverty. " l 

l Fioretti, cap. 12 (G. T. S. transl.) ; Actus, cap. 13; Chron. xxiv. Gen., 
Anal. Franc, torn. in. 117; De Conformit., Anal Franc, torn. iv. p. 608. 
An interesting comparison may be made between the praises of Poverty here 
set forth and the prayer to obtain Holy Poverty attributed by Wadding and 
others to St. Francis, but which is found for the first time in the Arbor 
Vita of Ubertino da Casale. Mr. Montgomery Carmichael says of this 
prayer: "though he (Ubertino) puts this prayer into the mouth of St. 
Francis, the context points to the fact that he is rather attempting to repro 
duce the sentiments of the Saint, than giving a prayer literally written by 



A NEW PHASE IN LIFE OF FKATEKNITY 211 

Did the sending forth of the brethren into foreign lands 
produce no other result than this praise of Poverty, the ad 
venture would be memorable : for, as in a lightning-flash, it 
reveals the mystery of that loyal worship which Francis kept 
for his ideal Lady Poverty. 

Francis, when at length he turned his face towards the 
north, came to Florence : and here ended this journey so far 
as he himself was concerned. For at Florence he met 
Cardinal Ugolino, the Papal Legate : and that meeting was 
the beginning of a new chapter in the history of the frater 
nity. 

Ugolino, Cardinal Bishop of Ostia and Legate of the 
Holy See for central and northern Italy, was one of 
Innocent the Third s cardinals, and on his father s side was 
related to the great Pope. 1 At this time he was about sixty 
years of age ; a handsome man, well built and of strong con 
stitution : a man of ability rather than of genius ; not gifted 
with any striking originality of character nor with the soaring 
inspiration so notable in Pope Innocent ; but he was yet 
a master of statecraft and a forceful man of affairs such as 
the Court of Rome has in all times so commonly produced. 

him" (vide The Lady Poverty, p. 193). A similar sentiment is found in 
the Sacrum Commercium, cap. vi. ; and finds an echo in Dante s Paradiso, 
canto xi. lines 71, 72. It is not at all improbable that Francis went to Rome 
before setting out for France. He seems to have gone to Rome whenever he 
undertook any scheme of importance. Thus according to Wadding he went 
to Rome in 1212 before undertaking the mission to the infidels ; and he was 
certainly in Rome several times during the period we are now entering upon. 
Cf. II Celano 96, 104, 119, 148 ; Spec. Perfect, cap. 67. Nor is it unlikely 
that whilst in Rome, Francis was told to consult Card. Ugolino at Florence, 
since Ugolino, as legate in Umbria, would be the necessary representative of 
the Holy See in those parts. It was probably thus in his capacity as legate 
that Card. Ugolino came first to act as "protector" of the Order, until the 
inconvenience of having " many popes " in the persons of succeeding legates, 
led Francis to request that Ugolino should be permanent protector (cf . Chron. 
Jordani, in Anal. Franc, no. 14, p. 5). 

J Two "lives" of Ugolino are given in Muratori, Rerum Italicarum 
Script, torn. in. pp. 570-4, and 575-87. The second "life" is evidently 
by one who knew him well, probably a member of his court. The frank ad 
miration of the writer for his subject is united with an intimate knowledge 
of details such as one can get only in constant companionship. Not unlikely 
he was Giovanni di Campania, the Papal notary. 

14* 



212 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSIST 

He had a marvellous memory and a clear insight into the 
bearings of things with which he had to deal. Moreover he 
was a scholar, well versed in law and the liberal arts and in 
theology, and a fluent and eloquent speaker. 1 

Innocent III had done well to bring his relative into his 
intimate counsels when he was seeking for men who would 
be devoted to the Church s welfare rather than to their own 
interest, men who in wielding and holding power, secular as 
well as spiritual, would set an example of personal piety and 
self-sacrifice. For Cardinal Ugolino was devoted heart and 
mind to the Church, and like the great Pontiff, he dreamed 
of a Church not only strong in secular dominion to rule an 
unruly world, but purified of secular abuses and of wrong 
doing, and transfused with the spirit of the Gospel. He 
himself was ascetic in the midst of the pomp and ceremonial 
of his official state ; and no charge was ever made against 
the purity and disinterestedness of his personal life. There 
was a curious commingling of opposing elements in his char 
acter. Had his education and circumstances been different 
he might have found greater satisfaction in the cloister 
than in the court. There were stirrings of the mystic 
in him at times, which conflicted with the promptings 
of that prudence he had learned in the management of 
men. At such times he would look with desire upon the life 
which took no heed of the world s actuality but was enrap 
tured into the unearthly claims of the spirit. 2 This strain of 
mysticism drew him into close sympathy with the peniten 
tial movement. 

Moreover the cardinal with all his calm political insight 
and habit of weighing affairs in the scales of common pru- 

1 Of. Muratori, loc. cit. p. 575 : " Forma decorus et venustus aspectu, per- 
spicacis ingenii et fidelis memories, prcerogativa dotatus, liberalium et utriusque 
juris peritia eminenter instructus, fluvius eloquentia TulliancB, sacrce pagince 
diligens observator et doctor ". 

2 Cf. I Celano, 75 ; II Celano, 63. Bartholomew of Pisa relates that the 
Cardinal once asked Francis advice as to whether he should renounce his 
dignities and become a Friar Minor ; but the saint refused to advise him one 
way or the other. Afterwards Francis foretold Ugolino s elevation to the 
Papal chair (Conformit. in Anal. Franc, iv. p. 454). 



A NEW PHASE IN LIFE OF FEATEENITY 213 

dence, was yet of an emotional temperament. 1 He was af 
fectionate in disposition and could not resist an appeal to his 
friendship. He loved to fill the part of a protector and clung 
tenaciously to those to whom he gave his heart. 

Before his meeting with Francis at Florence, he had al 
ready come to regard him and his fraternity with admiration 
and was amongst those who held it in favour at the Eoman 
Court. He knew well that there were those about the Court 
and in the hierarchy who were opposed to the new institute ; 2 
and not unlikely the thought had already occurred to him 
that if the fraternity was to come safely through the shoals 
of intrigue and the dangers of its own simple enthusiasm, it 
would need a friend at Court : for the Cardinal of St. Paul, 
the powerful patron of the brethren, was no longer there to 
defend and counsel them : he had died the year previous. 3 
On his part, Francis knew the Cardinal by reputation and 
regarded him with reverence not only for his priestly office 
but because of his blameless life. 

But now when they met for the first time in familiar con 
verse, both conceived for each other a strong affection. 
Francis confiding nature drew him to the strong man who 
was so ready to befriend the brethren and who was at once 
so gracious and sympathetic ; and the Cardinal was com 
pletely won by the simplicity and unworldliness of Francis : 
and so between these two men, so widely dissimilar in many 
respects, there sprang up an intimate friendship. The Car 
dinal s persuasive influence was at once shown in that he 
was able to dissuade Francis from continuing his journey to 
France : though not without need of argument. When first 
the Cardinal remonstrated that Francis ought to remain in 
Italy in consideration of the fact that many prelates sought 
to hinder the work of the fraternity, Francis replied in his 
vehement way : " My lord, much shame will it be to me if, 
having sent others of my brethren into far countries, I myself 
remain in these parts and do not share in the hardships and 

1 Vide, e.g. his letters to St. Clare, Anal. Franc, m. p. 183. 
2 1 Celano, 74 ; Chron. xxiv. Gen. in Anal. Franc, in. p. 10. 
:i Eubel, Hier. Cath. i. p. 36. 



214 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSISI 

troubles which await them ". To which Cardinal Ugolino 
answered that none of the brethren ought to be sent into dis 
tant countries to die, maybe, of hunger and suffering, and that 
they would do better to remain in Italy and peacefully pur 
sue their vocation there. Francis cried out warmly : " Think 
you, my lord, that it is only to these provinces that the Lord 
hath sent the brethren ? Of a truth I tell you that God hath 
chosen and sent the brethren for the profit and salvation of 
the souls of all the men that are in the world ; and not only 
in the countries of the faithful but even in the lands of the 
infidels shall they be received and win many souls." The 
Cardinal thereupon made no further effort to restrain the 
missionary enterprise of the brethren at large ; perhaps he 
now recognized that it were wise not to hold back the 
brethren nor to repress their energies ; yet he prevailed upon 
Francis himself to turn back and to send the brethren to 
France under another leader. 

Thus it came about that Brother Pacifico, the poet laure 
ate, was appointed to establish the fraternity in the land that 
Francis loved, next to his own Umbria, above all countries in 
the world. 1 

Like Francis himself, Pacifico had the true troubadour 
spirit, at once poetic and adventurous. When Francis had 
first met him some five years previously, he was a gay courtier, 
wearing his fresh laurels. They had both come on a visit to 
a convent of nuns at San Severino in the Marches of Ancona, 
where the poet heard the friar preach and was at once con 
verted in heart. After the sermon he sought out the preacher 
to ask advice concerning his soul. Francis was setting before 
him the greater nobility of service in the court of the Great 
King of heaven, when Pacifico exclaimed : " What need of 
further argument ? Let us come to deeds. Take me away 
from men and give me back to the Most High Emperor." 
And there in the presence of the crowd of youths who had 
come with him, Pacifico became a friar. 

To him his spiritual guide was always " the herald" of 

1 Spec. Perfect, cap. 65 ; Leg. Maj. iv. 9 ; Chron. xxiv. Gen. in Anal. 
Franc, in. p. 10. 



A NEW PHASE IN LIFE OF FKATEKNITY 215 

the Lord of heaven, and his imagination was apt to see him 
invested with the insignia of his spiritual heraldry. 

Once that was on the occasion of his conversion he 
saw Francis bedecked with two flaming swords crosswise ; 
another time, before this journey to France, when Francis 
was newly kindled with the thought of his spiritual crusade, 
he saw the forehead of his leader, adorned with the sign Thau 
emblazoned in many colours. 1 

He might not, perhaps, be the man to establish the brethren 
in the estimation of matter-of-fact prelates and suspicious 
defenders of the faith : and in this respect he does not seem 
to have been successful. But to those who had ears for his 
song, he could sing the message of Poverty convincingly and 
well. 

Francis returned to Assisi : God willed it so and he must 
obey: for already he was convinced that Cardinal Ugolino 
was set by Providence to be his counsellor and support : and, 
therefore, before he bade the Cardinal farewell, he had peti 
tioned him to preside at the next General Chapter. 

Of the experiences of the brethren who went beyond the 
Alps at this time, the story has been summed up in this 
passage from the Legend of the Three Companions : " They 
were received in certain provinces but were not permitted to 
build dwelling-places ; and from other provinces they were 
expelled in the fear that they might prove to be infidels : 
since although the lord Innocent III had sanctioned their 
Order and Eule, yet had he not confirmed it by letter ; for 
which reason the brethren endured many trials from clerics 
and laymen. Wherefore the brethren were compelled to flee 
from divers provinces, and thus straitened and afflicted, 
sometimes even robbed and beaten by thieves, they returned 
in great bitterness of spirit to the Blessed Francis." 2 

Other chroniclers give more explicit details. In France 
they were taken for heretics and when asked whether they 
were Albigenses, not knowing what the word might mean, 
they neither affirmed nor denied, and so the people were 

1 II Celano, 106 ; Celano, Tract, de Mirac. 3 ; Leg. Maj. iv. 9. 
2 3 Soc. 62. 



216 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSISI 

confirmed in their suspicion. A similar fate awaited the 
brethren who were sent to Portugal, and for a time they had 
perforce to wander about like vagabonds without a dwelling- 
place, until Urracha, Queen of Alfonso II, took them under 
her protection. They fared even worse in Germany, where 
the language was altogether unintelligible to them. One 
word only they secured out of the torrent of strange sounds 
they heard ; which word at first brought them comfort. 
For seeing them poor and weary, some kindly soul asked if 
they wanted shelter, to which the brothers, not understand 
ing the question but glad of fellowship, replied " Ja : " and 
shelter was given them. But when later, others came inquir 
ing whether they were heretics from Lombardy, the brethren 
again replied " Ja" : and then the trouble began. They 
were stripped and beaten and driven back towards the 
frontier. Those Germans were good Catholics : but the 
brethren understood only their blows and fury, and fled back 
to Assisi carrying with them a fast opinion that no Christian 
should venture amongst the Germans unless he were pre 
pared for martyrdom. So, too, in Hungary they were taken 
for heretics and mummers, and made the sport of the country 
they passed through and even treated with the grossest in 
sult. Only in Spain do they seem to have met with a kindly 
reception : a fact which might be accounted for if, as tradi 
tion has it, this mission was led by Bernard da Quintavalle 
who had already visited the country. 1 " And so," says one, 
" that entire mission came to nothing, because perhaps the 
time for sending forth was not yet come : since there is a 
time for everything under the sun." 2 But this philosopher 
was thinking chiefly of his own province of Germany, where 
the brethren gained nothing but the merit of such hardship 
and patience as was theirs. In France and Portugal, though 
they suffered much, the brethren arrived to stay : as also in 
Spain. But it was the last adventure of unaided faith so far 
as the fraternity in general were concerned. 

1 Of. Chron. Jordani in Anal. Franc, i. nos. 4, 5, 6, p. 3 ; Chron. xxiv. Gen. 
in Anal. Franc, in. p. 10 seq. ; Glassberger in Anal. Franc, n. p. 9 seq. 

2 Chron. Jordani, loc. cit. no. 8, p. 3. 



A NEW PHASE IN LIFE OF FEATEKNITY 217 

The brethren were beginning to learn that they who would 
gain the world, must take account of the world s demands. 
Two causes contributed to the failures : the inability of the 
brethren to speak the tongue of the people they went to, and 
their lack of knowledge of the conditions prevailing outside 
Italy. But even more than this the failures must be attri 
buted to the fact that they carried with them no authorizing 
document from bishops or Pope ; and that, at a time when 
the profession of poverty was mostly the mark of a heretic, 
brought them at once under suspicion. 

There can be no denying it : the faith of the fraternity 
was bruised in this first encounter with the larger world. 
The latent disaffection of some of the brethren with the 
simplicity of Francis, now found utterance, and a sense of 
failure saddened the loyalty of many. 

Already some were looking to the Cardinal Legate to 
supply Francis lack of the world s prudence, and they did 
not fail to set before him the story of this disaster. Francis 
took it all very humbly. He would have been more glad at 
heart had the brethren taken their failure in simple faith and 
patience and without discouragement. But Cardinal Ugo- 
lino had now taken the fraternity under his protection and, 
seeing in him the authority of the Church, Francis loyally 
submitted the fraternity to his direction. 

Before the brethren were sent abroad again, they were 
armed with commendatory letters from the Holy See. 



CHAPTER II. 
THE CHAPTER OF MATS. 

THE two years following upon the General Chapter of 1217 
were a period of intense missionary activity for the brother 
hood, as the vast increase in the numbers of the brethren 
testifies: for at the Chapter of 1219 about five thousand 
brethren were there assembled. 1 Yet few incidents of the 
period are recorded. It was one of those brooding periods 
when the earth is windless and the sky unbroken, though 
in the hidden spaces the elements of disturbance are gather 
ing force, sooner or later to burst through the still but heat- 
gathering heavens with undeniable storm. 

A new era had in fact begun in the history of the fra 
ternity. The brethren were no longer regarded by the Holy 
See as a free company, acting under the Papal authority but 
not recognized as part of its regular army. 

Already Cardinal Ugolino, surveying the ecclesiastical 
situation with the eye of an organizer, had determined in his 
own mind that the right policy was to create a new ecclesi 
astical army out of the two fraternities of Friars Minor and 
Friars Preachers which would be directly under the orders of 
the Holy See. With such a body of men ready to its hand, 
the Papacy might effectively carry out its scheme of internal 
reforms in the hierarchy and in the Church at large. 

The Cardinal had quite definite views as to the shape 
these reforms must take, and how these new fraternities 
might be utilized for the purpose. The Church needed 
bishops of unworldly mind and ascetic conduct, who would 
think more of the souls of the people than of temporalities 

1 Of. Leg. Maj. iv. 10 ; Spec. Perfect, cap. 68 ; Eccleston [ed. Little], coll. 
vi. p. 40 ; Actus, cap. 20. 

218 



THE CHAPTEK OF MATS 219 

and secular honours. The monastic state needed to be re 
called to its former austerity and discipline. The intellect of 
the Catholic world was being dissipated in purely secular 
studies, and there was need of preachers who could meet the 
heretics, armed at once with a blameless life and theological 
learning. In the two new Orders of friars Ugolino saw the 
providential means of carrying through these most urgent 
reforms. In his mind s-eye he beheld the friars occupying epis 
copal sees, setting the older Orders an example of monastic 
austerity combined with active work for the faith, and reviv 
ing the study of theology. Perhaps at this time he looked 
more to the Dominicans for the revival of sacred learning.. For 
Dominic had made study one of the primary conditions of his 
new Order. One of his first acts in founding the Friars 
Preachers had been to send six of his companions to the schools 
to go through a course of study to fit them for preaching. 
He himself during the Lent of 1217 had gained the ap 
plause of the Boman Court by his conferences upon the 
epistles of St. Paul. Yet amongst the Friars Minor were a 
number of schoolmen. The Cardinal would take that into 
account in his views concerning the utility of the fraternity. 

He had already pleaded with the two founders to allow 
their brethren to be raised to the episcopal dignity as occasion 
offered itself when sees were vacant. " In the primitive 
Church," argued Ugolino, "the pastors of the Church were 
poor men, and men on fire with charity and not with greed. 
Why should we not take some of your brethren and make 
them bishops and prelates?" Dominic had replied: "My 
lord, my brethren, if they know it, are already raised to an 
honourable estate ; nor if I can help it, will I permit them to 
accept other title of dignity ". And Francis had said : " My 
brethren are for this reason called minors that they should 
not presume to become the greater amongst their fellow- 
men. Our vocation teaches them to abide in the common 
way and to follow in the footsteps of Christ s humility, 
whereby in the end they will be exalted beyond others in the 
eyes of the saints. If you wish that they bear fruit in the 
Church of God, hold them and keep them in the state of 



220 LIFE OF ST. FEANCIS OF ASSISI 

their vocation, and make even the unwilling to return to the 
humble level. Wherefore, Father, I pray that you will on 
no account allow them to be raised to prelacies, lest they 
become the prouder because they are poorer and carry them 
selves conceitedly over others." l The Cardinal admired the 
humility of the two founders : in that same spirit he would 
wish all their brethren to remain : but he did not share their 
fears nor did he admit the validity of their more restricted 
views restricted, as he thought, by their own admirable 
humility and by the very intensity of their mental concentra 
tion upon the primary purposes of their institutes. It was, you 
see, the demand of the world for a practical utility corre 
sponding to its own immediate needs, meeting with an in 
spired purpose, at once more universal and exclusive, more 
piercingly poignant yet more aloof, than transient policies. 
Cardinal Ugolino s scheme was to harness these inspired 
purposes to the chariot of the Papal policy of reform; and 
when the Cardinal set his mind upon any scheme he clung 
to it with confident persistence. And in this case he felt 
himself justified in over-riding the scruples of the founders 
not only because of the sincerity of his own reforming pro 
jects, but because he was persuaded that only by adapting 
themselves to the immediate exigencies of the Papal policy, 
would the fraternities overcome the suspicion and active 
opposition with which they were regarded by many of the 
conservative prelates. He was much concerned lest this 
opposition should eventually break up the fraternities, and he 
exerted himself continually to establish them in the favour of 
the Pope and the goodwill of the Eoman Court. Dominic 
needed his protection less than Francis did. The character 
and purpose of the Friars Preachers was more easily grasped 
than that of the Friars Minor : their direct purpose was to 
repel the heretics and safeguard the faith. But the purpose 
of Francis was not so easily put into an intelligible phrase. 
He was a forceful moving spirit grasping at intangible ideals, 
who repelled more prudent, level-headed men when they 
considered him from afar : one never knew how he might 

1 II Celano, 148 ; Spec. Perfect, cap. 43. 



THE CHAPTEE OF MATS 221 

end or how far he might want to go. Ugolino himself had 
absolutely no doubt as to his sanity and sanctity : Francis, 
he was convinced, was a saint and heaven-sent reformer. 

To bring the sceptics to his own view he once arranged 
that Francis should preach before the Pope and the Papal 
Court. He was anxious Francis should make a good im 
pression, and induced him therefore to prepare a sermon 
carefully beforehand and commit it to memory. Francis 
acquiesced : but when the time came to preach, every word 
that he had learned vanished from his mind : fortunately 
perhaps for the preacher and his audience ; for recollecting 
himself awhile, he then spoke as his heart impelled him. He 
was the troubadour herald of divine love, all afire with his 
message : the words poured forth mellifluously, yet with 
torrential eagerness ; his feet danced to the music of his 
words. At first Ugolino held his breath in a great fear and 
prayed with all his heart that this preaching might not bring 
derision and mockery on his friend. But soon his fear was 
set at rest. Curiosity gave place to respectful attention ; 
many of those present could not restrain their tears. Francis 
had conquered. But one wonders what would have been the 
effect, had he managed to utter his carefully-prepared dis 
course, he who was nothing but when he was wholly and 
spontaneously himself. 1 

Meanwhile the spirit of discontent was becoming more 
and more articulate in the fraternity, and not a few of the 
brethren, chiefly it would seem among the schoolmen, chafed 
under the simplicity of Francis and his exalted idealism. 
They had neither his simple faith nor his wholesome per 
sonality. The untrodden ways along which he would lead 
them, brought them a sense of estrangement from the actual 
world, Francis himself never felt that estrangement because 
he instinctively found his neighbourhood with the essentially 

1 Leg. Maj. xn. 7 ; I Gelano, 73. Wadding is probably near the correct 
date in placing this sermon in 1217. From the wording of Celano it is clear 
that Francis was not yet very well known to Pope Honorius and his Court ; 
nor does he seem to have been very well known to Cardinal Ugolino, who 
surely in after years would hardly have asked his friend to write his sermon ! 



222 LIFE OF ST. FEANCIS OF ASSIST 

human and vital in the life around him. But these others 
had been trained to regard life only as it existed in con 
ventional and traditional forms. Outside these forms they 
could walk only haltingly and without conviction. 

Their failure to enter fully into Francis views was due 
partly to temperament, partly to education, partly doubtless 
to the persistent obtrusion of a more matter-of-fact world 
upon their daily experience. In a more or less vague per 
vasive fashion they had been genuinely influenced by the 
spirit of Francis : as men are apt to be influenced by a force 
ful personality in a time of keen perceptions and emotions. 
He had come into their lives like a fresh tonic breeze ; stir 
ring their spiritual emotions, and giving them a sense of 
spiritual freedom, upon the strength of which they abandoned 
their secular avocations and enlisted under his banner. But 
of the multitude who donned his armour not all could take to 
themselves his thought or live freely in the rare atmosphere of 
his desire. Instinctively they turned to the traditional and im 
mediately-practical ways in which to exercise the heightened 
spiritual vitality with which Francis had endowed them. 
They were unconscious that in doing so they would divert 
the stream of the Franciscan life from its own proper course 
and scatter its energies to its own loss. Francis simple 
purpose was to convert the world to the wisdom and beauty 
of the Christ-life as it is revealed in the poor and suffering 
Eedeemer. And he held that the fraternity was established 
by Christ to set an example of this Christ-life, undefiled by 
any compromise with secular ambition and prudence : it 
had no other aim or duty, no other rightful joy. The dis 
contented spirits amongst the brethren did not deny this 
purpose, but they quarrelled with Francis teaching concerning 
no compromise with the world s prudence. At least, they 
held, he should accept the world s prudence in so far as other 
religious men accepted it. 

Francis had no condemnation for other religious men : 
the prudence of the world is good in its own place ; and 
these other religious men were the keepers of their own con 
science : God did not lead all men in the same way. But 



THE CHAPTEE OF MATS 228 

the way of the Friars Minor was to live and work as Jesus 
Christ Himself lived and worked on earth, in humility and 
meekness and poverty, using only spiritual means and not 
relying upon any secular influence. If the brethren would 
convert men they must be willing to suffer and not shield 
themselves with letters of protection ; they must be exiles 
upon the earth without any earthly possessions ; they must be 
in fact and in appearance as the least of men and not occupy 
exalted positions ; they must preach the Gospel in its simpli 
city and not with a proud assumption of secular learning. 

It was perhaps at this period when the murmurs of the 
discontented brethren were beginning to trouble his thoughts, 
that Francis uttered his " parable of perfect joy ". Tradition 
says he was on his way from Perugia to the Porziuncola 
one day in the winter time when the cold was very biting. 
Brother Leo, his companion one who never doubted the 
wisdom of his leader was walking ahead, leaving Francis to 
his meditation, when he heard the voice of Francis calling to 
him: " Brother Leo, although the Friars Minor in these 
parts give a great example of sanctity and good edification, 
write it down and note it well that this is not perfect joy ". 
And as they continued their journey, Francis called to Leo 
again and yet again, instancing the gift of miracles, the 
knowledge of all languages and sciences, and of holy Scrip 
ture, and even the power of preaching whereby all infidels 
might be converted to the faith of Christ : in all these things 
he declared there was not perfect joy. At length Brother 
Leo asked : "Father, I pray thee, wherein is perfect joy?" 
Francis replied : "When we shall have come to St. Mary of 
the Angels, soaked as we are with the rain and frozen with 
the cold, encrusted with mud and afflicted with hunger, and 
shall knock at the door, if the porter should come and ask, 
angrily, * Who are you ? and we reply : We are two of your 
brethren ; he should say : You speak falsely ; you are two 
good-for-nothings, who go about the world stealing alms from 
the poor ; go your way : and if he would not open the door 
to us but left us without, exposed till night to the snow and 
the wind and the torrents of rain, in cold and hunger ; then 



224 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSISI 

if we should bear so much abase and cruelty and such a dis 
missal patiently, without disturbance and without murmur 
ing at him, and should think humbly and charitably that 
this porter knew us truly and that God would have him 
speak against us O Brother Leo, write that this would be 
perfect joy." In this strain Francis continued recounting 
possible humiliations and bufferings of body and mind. "If 
we should bear all these things," said he, " patiently and 
with joy, thinking on the pains of the Blessed Christ, as that 
which we ought to bear for His love Brother Leo, write 
that it is in this that there is perfect joy." l 

The discontented brethren no doubt listened with respect 
to this parable when it was afterwards recounted to them, 
but whilst admitting the ultimate conclusion as a counsel of 
personal perfection, they would yet hold to the lesser joys as 
the more immediate evidences of the fraternity s utility. 

They were doubtful whether the simplicity of the brethren 
did tend to the edification of the people, at least as much as 
the more ordered austerity of the ancient monastic rule ; 
they were certain that Francis under-rated the joy of learn 
ing ; and they would give much to be able to say that all the 
infidels were converted to the faith of Christ. And whilst 
Francis was praising his Lady Poverty for the life itself 
which he found in her, for the nearer approach which she 
made for him to the Lord he worshipped ; these others held 
her as a handmaiden to serve them in achieving less mystical 
purposes. So the storm elements were gathered when the 
brethren came together at the Pentecost Chapter, which was 
afterwards known as " the Chapter of Mats," because of the 
vast number of wattle huts hastily improvised by the arriving 
brethren. 2 At the outset an incident happened which was 

1 Fioretti, cap. vn. (C.T.S. transl.) ; Actus, cap. 7 ; of. Opuscula, Admonit. 
v. p. 8. The Fioretti gives us the parable as enshrined in oral tradition, and 
as it was retold by the brethren with a view to accentuate the ultimate 
conclusion. But it is substantially contained in the Admonition. It is note 
worthy that in the Fioretti Leo is bidden to " write it down ". The Admoni 
tion, therefore, may be Leo s written resum of the parable ; or it may be 
another recital of the same thought, dictated by Francis himself. 

2 Wadding is probably right in describing the Chapter of 1219 as the 
" Chapter of Mats " ; although John de Komorowo gives this title to the 



THE CHAPTER OF MATS 225 

in some way to set the note to the temper of this assembly. 
Francis had been on an evangelizing tour and only reached 
the Porziuncola when the preparations for the Chapter were 
already well advanced. To his dismay he found a large 
stone building erected near the chapel. The citizens of 
Assisi had built it for the better accommodation of the 
Chapter. They had not waited to consult Francis ; probably 
they meant to forestall his opposition : saints, like other folk, 
need at times to be managed tactfully. So they built the hall 
and awaited events. Quick was Francis resentment at this 
indignity offered to the Lady Poverty in her own home. 
Without delay he took with him some of the brethren, and 
climbed upon the roof and began to pull it down. Word was 
sent hastily to the civic authorities, and messengers and 
soldiers arrived to stop the demolition. " This building," they 
cried to Francis, " is not yours ; it belongs to the city." And 
their protest was upheld by the seneschal of the Chapter, an 
English brother named de Barton. Francis from the roof re 
plied : "If so be this house is yours, I have no wish to touch 
it " ; and straightway he came down. 1 What else could he 
do ? Yet in his heart theie was a foreboding of the trouble 
at hand : if at the Porziuncola the brethren would tolerate 
this appearance of disloyalty to their chosen poverty, how 
could the brethren elsewhere be kept true to their faith ? 

On Whitsunday morning Cardinal Ugolino, who was to 
preside at the Chapter, arrived from Perugia where he then 
had his court : with him came a retinue of nobles and 
clerics ; and from all the surrounding country men of all 
ranks had assembled to witness this unusual gathering. 

When the cardinal s approach was announced, the 
brethren went out in procession to meet him. At the sight 
of them in their coarse habits and bare feet, Ugolino was 

Chapter of 1221 (cf. Anal. Franc, n. p. 18, n. 8). But the Spec. Perfect, dis 
tinctly says that Cardinal Ugolino presided at the " Chapter of Mats," whereas 
Cardinal Rainerio presided at the Chapter of 1221 (cf. Chron. Jordam, in Anal. 
Franc, i. no. 16, p. 6). Giordano s description of the wattle-huts in 1221 is 
true of all the earliest Chapters. 

1 Spec. Perfect, cap. 7; II Celano, 57; Eccleston [ed. Little], coll. vi, 
p. 40. 

15 



226 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

much moved ; here was an army of Christ such as he had 
prayed for in his dreams of reform, and with the instinct of 
the born commander, he dismounted from his horse, put off 
his rich mantle and shoes, and barefoot like the brethren 
themselves, walked behind them to the church. 1 There he 
sang High Mass, Francis assisting as deacon. When Mass 
was over, Francis mounted a pulpit and preached to the 
brethren. His text was a minstrel s chant : 

Great things we have promised, 

But greater are promised to us ; 

What we have promised let us fulfil, 

To what we are promised let us look forward. 

A brief delight and punishment for ever ; 

A little suffering and glory infinite ! 

Upon this theme he figured the life of a Friar Minor a 
life of obedience and love, of prayer and patience and chastity, 
of peace and concord with God and men, of humility and 
meekness, unworldliness and poverty, and as the sum of all, 
the casting of all care for oneself upon " the good Shepherd 
and Nurse of soul and body, our Lord Jesus Christ the 
Blessed ". The same lesson he had preached in the beginning 
when the brethren were but three or four in number. To 
some it had seemed a mad idea then that men should have no 
care for their own bodily being and leave it all to God. To-day 
the world did not call Francis mad : he was too manifestly a 
saint. Yet some of them doubted his wisdom when, point 
ing the moral to his lesson, he commanded the five thousand 
friars present to give no thought during the Chapter to 
the providing of food or to any other bodily need, but to con 
cern themselves wholly with prayer and the praises of God. 
In the event, Francis faith was abundantly justified, for 
whilst the Chapter lasted, the roads leading to the Porziun- 
cola were kept busy with mules and asses laden with pro- 

a 3 Soc. 61. Cf. I Celano, 100. Bartholomew of Pisa (Conformit. in 
Anal. Franc, iv. p. 454) says Ugolino often put on the habit of the friars when 
in their company ; and that he was accustomed on Maundy Thursday to be 
clothed in the habit when washing the feet of the poor. Cf. Salimbene, 
Mon. Germ. Hist. Script., xxxn. p. 680; Chron. xxiv. Gen., Anal. Franc. 
in. p. 228. 



THE CHAPTEE OF MATS 227 

visions for the multitude of friars. 1 But this miracle, as they 
would deem it, might bear witness to the holiness of Francis ; 
yet it could hardly establish a rule for general imitation. 
Evidently the fraternity needed more practical government : 
at least that was the mind of many present ; and these 
appealed to the Cardinal for support for their views. Francis 
replied in an outburst of indignant sorrow: " My brethren, 
my brethren ! The Lord has called me by the way of sim 
plicity and humility, and this way hath He pointed out to me 
in truth for myself and for them who are willing to believe 
me and imitate me. Wherefore I will not that you name 
to me any other Eule, neither of St. Benedict nor of St. 
Augustine, nor of St. Bernard, nor any other way or manner 
of living beside that which the Lord in His mercy hath 
shown and given me. The Lord told me that He willed me 
to be poor and foolish in this world, and that He willed not 
to lead us by any way other than by that knowledge. But 
with this learning and wisdom of yours, may the Lord con 
found you, and I trust in the castellans of the Lord that 
through them God will punish you, and that you will return 
to your vocation for all your fault-finding, whether you will 
or no." 2 

For the moment the dissident brethren were silenced ; 
but they were not convinced. Their immediate outlook con 
cerning the fraternity was radically different from their foun- 

1 Actus, cap. 20 ; Fioretti, cap. xvn. The story as told in the Actus goes 
on to relate how St. Dominic was won over to absolute poverty by seeing how 
St. Francis faith was fulfilled. But Dominic was in Spain at the time of the 
Chapter (cf. Acta SS. Augusti, torn. i. pp. 485-6). It is not improbable that 
he may have been present at another Chapter where similar events occurred : 
for the first Chapters present many common features. It is, however, note 
worthy that Dominic introduced the rule of absolute poverty into his Order 
in 1220, influenced most probably by the example of the Friars Minor. 

2 Spec. Perfect, cap. 68 ; the reading of the Vatican MS., which I have 
followed, is more in accordance with Bartholomew of Pisa (Conformit. in Anal. 
Franc, iv. p. 143) than that of the Mazarin MS., which makes Francis say: 
" He [the Lord] willed me to be a new Covenant in this world ". 

This outburst of Francis is fully in accord with his character (cf. e.g. 
II. Celano, 156). Moreover one may note the similarity between the con 
clusion of this admonition and Francis words to the Cardinal given in II 
Celano, 148 : " Tenete illos . . . ct ad plana reducite vel invitos ". 

15 * 



228 LIFE OF ST. FEANCIS OF ASSIST 

der s ; and it was not in Francis to argue the point logically. 
He was a poet bearing witness to the vision he saw : he was 
neither logician nor politician to deal with the arguments of 
those who were against him. His critics might bow for 
awhile before the fervour and sincerity of his pleading. 
Many of the brethren probably imagined that the trouble 
was finished, but Cardinal Ugolino, with his knowledge of 
men, would be thoughtful of the morrow, and doubtless was 
thankful in his mind that Providence had made him the 
friend of Francis and the brethren for the difficult future 
which lay before them. 

It were easy, and as foolish as it were easy, to brand the 
dissident brethren as weaklings in their vocation or as trai 
tors to Francis. That some of them merited to be thus 
branded is doubtless true. But for the most part they sincerely 
reverenced Francis and were proud to own him their leader. 
They felt the stirring of his spirit and gladly responded to it, 
as far as it was in them to respond. With these the trouble 
Was not of their own making : it was the perennial difficulty 
found by a multitude in accepting as a guide in life, an ideal 
which demands a clear, spiritual insight and a more than 
common aloofness from the set ways of the world. In such 
case men suffer because of a lack of the rare simplicity re 
quired for the perfect understanding and realization of the 
ideal life proposed to them. They are pulled by two loyalties 
and are apt to cut an unheroic figure in consequence. And 
yet were it not for such men the world would be much the 
poorer morally and spiritually. They retail the spiritual life 
much as the ordinary intelligent student retails the message 
of a master, and it is through the more commonplace intelli 
gence that the genius permeates the world. Only at times 
the student is apt to misread his text either in the letter 
or worse still in the spirit : yet for that reason one does 
not universally condemn the purpose of the student nor in 
dict his sincerity. So much must be said for the dissident 
brethren, if we would rightly appreciate this trouble which 
had now come into Francis life. 

But the Chapter came to some definite decisions in spite 



THE CHAPTEE OF MATS 229 

of the trouble which overclouded it. The established pro 
vinces were confirmed and others instituted ; l but chiefly it 
was determined to send missions to the infidels. One band 
of friars, including Brother Giles, 2 was set apart for Tunis ; 
another, under the leadership of Brother Vitale, for Morocco ; 3 
whilst and this perhaps was the surprise of the Chapter 
Francis was to undertake a mission to the Mahometans in 
Egypt. 

1 Thus France was divided into three provinces the provinces of France 
proper, of Provence, and of Aquitaine. John Bonelli " the cudgel of 
Florence," was appointed Minister of Provence ; and Christopher of Ro- 
mandiola, Minister of Aquitaine. Cf. Golubovich, Arch. Franc. Hist. an. i. 
fasc. i. p. 4 ; vide supra, p. 207. 

2 Chron. xxiv. Gen. in Anal. Franc, in. p. 78. 

Ibid. Vide infra, p. 238. Vitale fell ill in Spain and so did not 
reach Morocco ; so his companions went on without him under the leader 
ship of Brother Berardo. 



CHAPTEK III. 
FRANCIS GOES TO THE EAST. 

To anyone who did not know Francis, his decision to under 
take a mission to the infidels at this critical juncture would 
surely seem but another indication of his lack of common 
prudence. In truth it was the highest wisdom. 

He was not set to fashion the world s commoner ways 
with needful compromise and regard for the weaker faith, 
but to bear witness to a higher, more absolute truth which 
in its purity might be beyond the practical politics of the 
actual world and only intelligible to the few. 

Francis power was in his fidelity to the truth as he saw 
it and in his entire absorption in the vision which led him 
on. Because it was a true vision of life, it would compel the 
world s homage, even though the world could not fully 
understand and accept it ; and in this homage the world 
would be, in some measure at least, ruled by it. But if 
Francis had turned from the following of his vision to argue 
by the way, his argument would have been of little avail, 
because the vision itself would have been lost sight of ; since 
only in his faithful quest was the vision itself revealed. 
Never was it more needful than now that he should be just 
himself, the perfect knight of a spiritual chivalry. It is not 
for a soldier in the act of battle to debate the merits of his 
loyalty, when the cause to which his faith is pledged depends 
upon his own good blows. Instinctively Francis felt that, 
and it made him the more urgent to take part in this new 
adventure for the love of Christ, which at his own suggestion 
the Chapter had agreed to. 

And this time Cardinal Ugolino did not prevent his leaving 
Italy. Whether he attempted to do so at first and afterwards 

230 



FEANCIS GOES TO THE EAST 231 

gave way to the pleading of Francis ; or whether he straight 
way consented, we do not know. 1 

Nor is it possible to say how far the -Cardinal was con 
cerned in the appointment of the two Vicars-General who 
were to govern the fraternity during Francis absence. 

One of these, Brother Matthew of Narni, a man of noted 
sanctity/ 2 was to reside at the Porziuncola and receive the 
novices ; the other, Brother Gregory of Naples, was to travel 
through the provinces " to console the brethren ". 3 In after 
years this Gregory of Naples was to acquire an unenviable 
reputation ; 4 and how he fulfilled the trust now committed 
to him, we shall soon see. 

1 M. Sabatier suggests that the Cardinal favoured Francis absence at 
this time in order that he himself might have a freer hand in dealing with 
the fraternity : but this is pure assumption based only upon M. Sabatier s 
theory that the Cardinal was an out-and-out partisan of the dissident friars 
(of. Vie de S. Francois, p. 265 seq.). But the facts of the case as history re 
cords them, rather shows that Ugolino was honestly endeavouring to act 
impartially as between Francis and the dissidents and to bridge over the 
difficulties. As a man of affairs he frequently supported the dissidents in 
what he deemed a more practical policy: at the same time he was truly 
anxious for the observance of the rule and ideals of Francis, and was anxious 
to safeguard them against an unspiritual laxity. 

An instance may be found in the letter which Honorius III wrote to the 
Friars (Minors and Preachers) who were sent to Morocco in 1225 a letter 
probably dictated by Ugolino as Cardinal-Protector. The Friars had found 
that they could not get alms of food in that country and had requested a 
dispensation allowing the use of money. The dispensation was granted, but 
only for so long as the necessity forced the Friars to use it : " quamdiu prce- 
scripta vos arctat necessitas . . . dum tamen fraus non interveniat, sive dolus, 
vel sinceritatem vestram cupiditas non seducat ". Sbaralea, Bull. i. p. 26. 

2 Cf . Conformit. in Anal. Franc, iv. p. 242. 

3 Chron. Jordani, in Anal. Franc, i. no. 11, p. 4. 

4 He was appointed Provincial of France in 1221 or 1222. At the death of 
Francis, Elias addressed a letter to him (vide infra, p. 261). In 1240, he was 
deposed from the Provincialate and imprisoned on account of his cruelty to 
the brethren (Eccleston [ed. Little], coll. vi, p. 36). M. Sabatier identifies 
him with a Gregory of Naples who became Bishop of Bayeux in 1274 (cf. Spec. 
Perfect, p. 333) but this is very doubtful (cf. P. Hilarin Felder, Histoire des 
]ti4des, p. 181, n. 5). Concerning this Bishop of Bayeux, vide Gallia Chris 
tiana, pp. 369-70 ; also titudes Franciscaincs, xxiv. p. 615 seq. and xxvi. 
p. 411 seq. M. Sabatier has published in Spec. Perfect, append, vu. 
p. 332, a letter of Gregory of Naples which purports to have been written 
" anno Dni. 1219, 13 Kalendas Januar. in festo SS. Fabiani et Sebastian! ". 



232 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

The two Vicars were both good preachers ; and Gregory 
of Naples had been trained in the schools. 1 

The government of the fraternity being thus arranged, 
Francis set out for Ancona, to find a passage in one of the 
boats which were to carry crusaders to the East about the 
feast of St. John the Baptist on 24 June. 2 He was accom 
panied by Brother Peter Cathanii, the learned doctor of laws, 
who in the past had acted as Francis Vicar at the Porziun- 
cola; by Brothers Illuminate 3 and Leonard, both men of 
noble birth ; by Brother Barbaro, perhaps the Barbaro who 
had joined him in the earliest days of the fraternity, and others. 
They were thirteen in all ; and it is said that the number 
might have been greater, so eager were many of the brethren 
to share in this adventure. 4 

Leaving Ancona, the band of missionaries came first to 
Cyprus where Brother Barbaro lost his temper in a sharp 
dispute with another brother, but immediately humbled him 
self, much to the edification of a nobleman of the island. 5 
About the middle of July they reached Acre, the stronghold 
of the Crusaders on the Syrian coast. 6 

The letter declares the conditions upon which the Friars Minor receive a 
house at Auxerre. The date of the letter, however, cannot be authentic. 
Henry de Vill-neuve mentioned in the letter was consecrated Bishop of 
Auxerre only on 20 September, 1220 (cf. Eubel, Hierach. Cath. p. 121) ; besides 
which, the feast of SS. Fabian and Sebastian is on the 13 Kalends of February. 
Possibly the date of the letter should be MCCXXIIII instead of MCCXVIIII 
as M. Sabatier gives it. Gregory of Naples was minister of France when 
Haymo of Faversham entered the Order, sometime between 22 May, 1222, 
and Easter, 1224 (cf. Eccleston [ed. Little], pp. 34-35). 

1 Two of his sermons are preserved in the Bibliot. Nationale of Paris. 
Cf. Little s Eccleston, p. 36, n. a. 

2 Cf. Acta SS. Octob. n. p. 611 ; P. Sabatier, Vie die S. Francois, p. 258. 

3 Illuminate had been lord of Kocca Accarina in the Valley of Eieti. Cf . 
M. Achille Sansi, Documenti storici, p. 269, quoted by P. Sabatier, Spec. 
Perfect, p. 306, n. 3. 

4 Bartholomew of Pisa (cf . Conformit. in Anal. Franc, iv. p. 481) relates 
that Francis being unwilling to show favouritism in the choice of his com 
panions, called a little child and bade him point out the friars who were to 
accompany him. 

5 II Celano, 155 ; Spec. Perfect, cap. 88. 

6 Golubovich, Bibliotheca-Bio-Bibliografica, p. 93. According to Mariano of 
Florence, St. Francis touched also at Crete. Cf. ibid. p. 77. Golubovich 



FEANCIS GOES TO THE EAST 233 

Thence after a few days Francis sailed on to Egypt to 
join the Christian army besieging Damietta; from which 
point he meant to penetrate into the land of the infidel. This 
was Francis first experience of those military expeditions 
which had aroused his enthusiasm in his youth and which 
still symbolized to him the hardihood and adventure of his 
vocation. The glory of chivalry mingled in his mind with this 
actual warfare for the Faith which was gathering the knight 
hood of Christendom beneath the walls of Damietta : it lay 
like a sunlit mist over the spread-out army of the Cross, 
giving it a mystic beauty. 

But very quickly Francis learned that here too, in the 
camp over which one of the most sacred emotions of the 
Christian people yearned expectantly, the purest ideal rubbed 
shoulders with the most sordid. Heroes there were, fearless 
and sincere in their religious devotion, who would die for the 
Cross with the martyr s piety : but for the most part the 
Cross was a mere war-cry, and the vision which beckoned 
the crusader onward was but a purely secular love of adven 
ture, or worse still, lust of plunder and the vicious liberty of 
the camp. To Francis the shameless vice in the Christian 
army was sacrilegious defilement of a sacred cause, and he 
did not wonder at the disasters which marked the progress of 
this drawn-out siege. 1 So far the fortune of war was balanc 
ing between the two armies, though there had been much 
bloodshed. But towards the end of August the crusaders 
prepared for a grand assault upon the city. Francis, with 
prophetic insight, knew that the assault was doomed to 
failure and was much troubled and could not decide whether 
to warn the leaders of the army or keep silence. The crus 
aders were confident of victory. " If I tell them disaster 

asserts (p. 93) that St. Francis left all his companions at Acre, excepting 
Brother Illuminato, with whom alone he went on to Egypt. I know not on 
what authority he makes this statement, which seems in contradiction with 
II Celano, 30. 

ir The siege of Damietta was begun about 24 August of the preceding year 
by Leopold, Duke of Austria. The Papal Legate, Cardinal Pelagio, arrived in 
the besieging lines in September, bringing with him an Italian army. Cf. 
Golubovich, op. cit. p. 89. 



234 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSISI 

will happen to them," said Francis to one of his companions, 
they will think me a fool ; yet if I remain silent I shall not 
escape the judgment of my conscience. Tell me, therefore, 
what think you I should do ? " The brother replied : " Less 
than nothing is it for thee to be judged by men ; for it is not 
now that they will begin to call thee a fool ". 

So Francis went and gave his warning. The army, how 
ever, laughed and went gaily forward to the attack. Francis 
in an agony of soul dared not watch the battle, but twice he 
sent his companion to see how things were happening. 
Each time the brother returned, saying he could see nothing. 
A third time Francis sent him out, and then he came back to 
relate that the Christian army was falling back in disarray. 
That day the crusaders lost six thousand slain and captive. 
Francis grieved much over the dead, especially over the 
fallen knights of Spain who had maintained the attack with 
utmost gallantry so that few of them returned. 1 Negotiations 
were now opened between the leaders of the crusade and the 
Sultan of Egypt. On both sides it was merely a stratagem 
to mark time : the crusaders were daily expecting reinforce 
ments from across the sea : the Sultan hoped diplomatically 
to work upon the fears of the Christians and force them to 
retire altogether. These negotiations lasted until the end of 
September ; when the Sultan, disillusioned as to the intentions 
of the Christian army, again began hostilities. 2 

Meanwhile Francis had again set common prudence at 
nought and had gone over to the Sultan s camp. 

After the disastrous repulse of the crusaders, he had 
sought out the Papal legate who was with the army, and 
requested leave to cross over to the Moslem lines and preach 
to the Sultan. The legate heard him incredulously. Was it 
not known that the Sultan had offered a golden ducat for the 
head of any Christian sent to him ? He would not take upon 
himself any responsibility in the matter. It might be an 

1 II Celano, 30 ; Leg. Maj. xi. 3. See the accounts of the battle given by 
Jacques de Vitry and others, in Golubovich, op. cit. p. 7 seq. The battle was 
fought on 29 August. 

2 Golubovich, op. cit. p. 94. 



FKANCIS GOES TO THE EAST 235 

inspiration from God or a temptation from the devil. There 
fore he would neither encourage nor dissuade. Let Francis 
take his soul into his own hands ; only let him behave himself 
so as not to bring shame on the Christian name. 1 That was 
sufficient for Francis. Eager to save the souls of the Sultan 
and the Moslem people or to die in the attempt for the honour 
of his Saviour, he at once set out, taking with him Brother 
Illuminate. At the start they came across two lambs on the 
road. The face of Francis brightened : he turned to Illuminate 
and exclaimed : "Put thy trust in the Lord, brother ; for in 
us that saying is fulfilled : Behold I send you forth as sheep 
in the midst of wolves ". Perhaps Illuminate needed the 
consolation. Outside the Christian lines they were seized by 
Moslem soldiers, and, unable as they were to make themselves 
understood in the Moslem speech, they were roughly handled. 
Eventually as Francis persistently cried out : " Soldan, 
Soldan ! " the soldiers took him to the Sultan s camp, and 
here Francis could converse with the officials in the lingua 
franca. He told them his purpose : he wished to preach the 
Gospel of Christ to the Sultan. Among the common soldiery 
in the Moslem lines this declaration might have been followed 
by a speedy death ; but in the courtly circle of the Sultan s 
own camp, it was received with good-humoured tolerance. 
The courtier-Moslem was much of a rationalist and was not 
averse from debating the relative merits of the Gospel and 
the Koran as an intellectual pastime. He was, moreover, 
a curious mixture of ferocity and chivalry, even as were 
his Christian enemy. So Francis was brought into the 
presence of Melek-el-Kamil and expounded the Gospel of 
Christ. 

Not unlikely the Sultan had consented to the audience as 
an interlude in the serious affairs of the day. But as he 
listened, he knew that here was more than a profession 
of belief, fanatical or conventional. Before the audience was 
over he felt himself drawn to this preacher ; and in dismiss- 

1 Cf. Leg. Maj. ix. 8 ; Conformit. in Anal. Franc, iv. p. 481 ; Bernard! 
Thesaurarii, Liber de Acquisitione Terra Sanctcp, in Golubovich, op. cit. p. 13 
seq. 



236 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSIST 

ing him for the day, ordered that he should be courteously 
provided for in the camp. It seems that there were several 
audiences ; l and that the Sultan was so far won over to him 
that he asked him to remain at his court and dwell there. 
" Willingly," replied Francis, " if you and your people will be 
converted to Christ." And seeing that the Sultan was yet 
unconverted, Francis proposed a final test. " If you hesitate 
as to the merits of the law of Mahomet and the faith of 
Christ, command that a great fire be lighted, and I together 
with your priests, will enter into the fire that you may know 
which is the more worthy and true." To which Melek-el- 
Kamil replied that no priest of his would accept the chal 
lenge. " Then if you will promise for yourself and your 
people, to come to the worship of Christ if I come out of the 
fire unhurt, I will enter the fire alone," retorted Francis; 
" only," he added, " if I am burnt up, impute it to my sins, and 
if the Divine power protects me, acknowledge Christ to be 
true God and the Saviour of all." 

The Sultan answered that he dared not accept the test for 
fear of a tumult amongst his people : yet he begged Francis 
not to cease from praying for him that he might come to 
know the true Faith. Then he wished to give Francis some 
token of his good-will. Would he not accept some precious 
gift if not for himself at least for the poor whom he might 
relieve in their needs ? And so it seemed that the only result 
which was likely to come of further preaching would be a re 
iterated offer of gifts. Francis had not come hither for that. 
Sorrowfully, therefore, he at length asked permission to 
return to the Christian camp, and at Melek-el-Kamil s orders, 
he was conducted back with courtesy. 2 

1 Of. Jacques de Vitry, Epist. de captione Damiatae, in Golubovich, op. cit. 
p. 8: " Cum multis diebus Saracenis verbutn Domini pradicasset ;" Historic/. 
Occidentalis (Douai), p. 353 ; Golubovich, op. cit. pp. 9-10. 

2 1 Celano, 57 ; Leg. Maj. ix. 8. Chron. Jordani, in Anal. Franc, i. no. 10. 
p. 4. Cf. Golubovich, op. cit. ut supra, p. 235, note 1. In Verba fr. Illu- 
minati (Golubovich, op. cit. p. 36) there is a description of Francis first 
audience with the Sultan which is quite consistent with Eastern manners. 
The Sultan, so the story runs, ordered a carpet to be spread which was 
covered with crosses. " If he treads on the crosses," said the Sultan, " I will 



FKANCIS GOES TO THE EAST 237 

Doubtless when he again appeared in the Christian lines, 
many smiled at his simplicity ; yet there were some who felt 
that the simple faith in which the enterprise had been under 
taken was of more enduring value than any actual achieve 
ment. Perhaps these already suspected that for lack of this 
same faith the crusade was doomed to ignoble failure, even 
though Damietta might be taken. 

Damietta did indeed fall before the winter was passed, 
thanks to the large reinforcements sent by the Pope ; and on 
the feast of the Purification, 1220, the crusaders entered the 
city in solemn triumph. And then the discipline of the army 
broke down completely, and the greater part succumbed to 
the seductive pleasures of the Egyptian spring ; and the last 
decencies were openly disregarded. 1 

Francis remained with the army till the city was captured, 
striving to stem the flood of vice. At last in sheer despair 
of doing any good there, he turned his back on the crusade, 
and taking advantage of the spring sailings, crossed the 
sea to Acre. 2 And with him went a number of clerics from 
the suite of the crusading prelates, who renounced high pre 
ferments in the Church to enter the fraternity. 3 

accuse him of insulting his God ; if he refuses to walk on it, I will accuse him 
of insulting me." Francis unhesitatingly walked across the carpet ; and 
when taunted by the Sultan that he had trodden on the cross which he pro 
fessed to adore, he replied : " You should know our Lord died between two 
thieves. We Christians have the true cross ; the crosses of the thieves we 
have left to you, and these I am not ashamed to tread upon." The reply is 
quite in keeping with Francis character. The Verba fr. Illuminati, are given 
by P. Golubovich from the Vatican MS. Ottob. lat. n. 522 of the XIV century, 
a collection of stories by a Minorite preacher. P. Golubovich remarks that 
the original source of these stories may yet be found. There is, however, no 
indication of them in existing authentic documents. See also the stories re 
lated in Conformit. in Anal. Franc, iv. p. 483. Cf. ed. 1513, fol. 223 a. 

In the sacristy of the Convento Sagro, Assisi, there is preserved a horn 
which is said to have been given by the Sultan to Francis and which the saint 
afterwards used to call people together when he was about to preach. 

1 " Scordandosi i disagi ed i perigli delta guerra, si diedcro in brdccio alia 
mollezza, alia volutta, ed ai placer i tutti cJie loro poteano ispirare la vicinanza 
della primavera, il clima ed il bel cielo di Damiata," Michaud, Storia, lib. xn. 
in Golubovich, op. cit. p. 96. 

2 L estoire de Eracles in Golubovich, p. 14. 

3 Gf. Jacques de Vitry, loc. cit. p. 8. 



238 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSISI 

At Acre, Francis was welcomed by Brother Elias, the 
Minister-Provincial of Syria, and with Elias was a novice, 
Brother Caesar of Speyer, who had been a famous preacher of 
the Crusades and had to flee from his native Germany to 
escape the anger of the relatives of the men whom he had in 
duced to take the cross. This Caesar was, moreover, a learned 
theologian and withal a man of simple, sturdy piety, ready to 
lay down his life for a sacred cause. 1 He had gone with the 
Christian army to Syria and there had been received as a 
friar by Elias. 

From Acre, Francis set out on a pilgrimage to the Holy 
Places of Palestine, his heart uplifted with a loving rever 
ence for the earth which had been trodden by the feet of his 
Divine Master. Some say that in the camp of the Sultan 
Kamil, he had met Kamil s brother Conradin, the Sultan 
of Damascus, who had given him a free pass to visit the 
shrines of the Holy Land, which freed him from paying the 
customary dues which the Moslem exacted from Christian 
pilgrims. 2 He also made a preaching tour of the Christian 
colonies in Syria, and gained many adherents to the frater 
nity, amongst whom was the prior of the Cathedral at Acre. 
It is said that near Antioch a community of Benedictine 
monks, won by his preaching, made a vow of absolute 
poverty and became Friars Minor. 3 But of these pilgrim 
journeys but little certain record is left us, and thus a chapter 
in the story of Francis over which one would willingly linger, 
comes to an abrupt conclusion. 

Meanwhile, however, the missionary enterprise initiated 
at the Chapter of 1219, had already been consecrated with 
the martyr s blood. Five of the brethren sent to Morocco 
had been done to death in those parts, whilst Francis was 
still with the crusading army before Damietta. They were 
Brothers Berardo, Otho, Pietro, Accurso, and Adjuto. Setting 

1 Eventually he died a martyr s death for his zeal for the Franciscan 
Rule, as some assert at the connivance of Brother Elias himself. Of. Angelo 
Clareno, Hist. VII Tribulat. in Golubovich, pp. 118-19. 

2 Angelo Clareno, in Golubovich, p. 56; Conforinit. in Anal. Franc, iv. 
p. 482. 

3 Conformit., ibid. p. 483. 



FEANCIS GOES TO THE EAST 239 

out on their enterprise shortly after Francis had started on 
his, they had first gone to Seville in Spain, where the Moslem 
still ruled ; and for an attempt to preach there, had been 
scourged and imprisoned and finally expelled that kingdom. 

Thence they had passed over to Morocco. With a zeal 
which might well seem intemperate to men of less impulsive 
ardour, they not only preached in the streets but had even 
entered the mosques and denounced Mahomet there. Im 
prisoned and scourged though they were, their fervour was 
not to be restrained : in prison they attempted to convert 
their jailers. The Moslem, unwilling to proceed to extrem 
ities according to law, acceded to the request of the Infante 
Pedro of Portugal, who was then resident at the Sultan s 
Court, that these impetuous friars should be sent out of the 
country. Don Pedro thought thus to save their lives and 
probably also to prevent an outburst on the part of the 
populace against the Christians in the country. 

But the five friars knew nothing of diplomacy and had 
not the temper to live and let live. Mahomet was in their 
eyes the enemy of Christ, and the souls of this people were 
rightful spoils for their Divine Kedeemer. To go back upon 
their mission would be but a traitorous backsliding from their 
fealty to their Saviour. At the first opportunity they 
eluded their guard and returned to the city; then appeared 
again before the mosque, appealing to the people to renounce 
Mahomet. 

Again they were seized and cast into jail and put to the 
torture. Whilst upon the rack, they were offered life and 
gifts if they would deny Christ and acknowledge Mahomet ; 
but their only reply was to utter the praises of Christ and 
invite their torturers to worship Him. At length, finding all 
persuasions useless, the judges put the law into execution. 
The five friars were beheaded and their bodies cast outside 
the walls to be the food of dogs. And so they died for the 
Christ they loved, not wisely perhaps if we judge them by 
the ethics of a more wary world, but gloriously in the sim 
plicity of their faith. Thus indeed Don Pedro, the Portuguese 
Infante, adjudged their martyrdom. Stealthily he had their 



240 LIFE OF ST. FEANCIS OF ASSI8I 

bodies rescued and taken to Portugal, where with great re 
verence they were laid in the Church of the Canons Eegular 
at Coimbra. 1 

Now amongst those who flocked to pray beside the mar 
tyrs relics was a young Canon Eegular, who listening to the 
story of their martyrdom, burned to emulate their example. 
Not many days later he went to the Friars Minor who dwelt 
outside the city and begged them to give him the habit of 
their Order and send him to preach to the Moors : and 
gladly the friars welcomed him. That was how Anthony of 
Padua as he came to be styled joined the fraternity. The 
martyrs had not died in vain if only Anthony s coming were 
the result ; as we shall yet see. 

When Francis heard the news of the martyrdom he cried 
out in a transport of gratitude to heaven : " Now I can truly 
say I have five brothers ". And in the days which were upon 
him the triumph of their simple faith was as balm to his 
spirit. He needed some such consolation ; for the great 
sorrow of his life was now fast closing upon him. 

He had returned to Acre, not it would seem without some 
foreboding of trouble. There he was met by a Brother 
Stephen, a lay brother, who had come from Italy, bringing a 
message from many of the brethren there, which begged 
Francis, if he were still alive, to come back at once and save 
his Order. The brother related how the two Vicars-General 
were imposing obligations upon the brethren at variance with 
the Eule Francis had given them, and how the brethren who 
refused to be bound of these new obligations were badly 
treated by the Vicars and even driven out of the Order. 
Brother Stephen himself had had to flee secretly without the 
knowledge of the Vicars. And he brought with him, in con 
firmation of his story, a copy of the new Constitutions which 
the Vicars had made at a Chapter they had held. 

Francis was at table when the Constitutions were brought 
to him, and amongst the foods before him was flesh meat. 
In the Constitutions he read that the brethren were not 

1 Of. Passio Sanct. martyrum frat. Beialdi, etc. in Anal. Franc, in. pp. 
579-96 ; ibid. pp. 15-21 ; Conformit. in Anal. Franc, iv. pp. 322-3. 



FKANCIS GOES TO THE EAST 241 

to quest for flesh meat not even on days which were not 
fasting-days : moreover they were to fast on Mondays as well 
as on the days prescribed in the Rule. Whereupon Francis 
turned to Peter Cathanii, who was with him. " Messer 
Peter, what shall we do ? " he asked. " Ah, Messer Francis," 
replied Peter, " do as you think well, for authority is yours." 
" Then we will eat what is set before us according to the 
Gospel," said Francis. 1 

When the next boats sailed at the end of the summer, 
Francis returned to Italy. 2 He took with him Brothers Peter 
Cathanii, Elias and Caesar of Speyer for he felt he had need of 
these men with their knowledge of affairs : and they were 
men in whom he had a great trust. 

J Cf. Chron. Jordani in Anal. Franc, i. no. 11, 12, p. 4. Angelus 
Claren. Hist. VII Tribulat. in Golubovich, op. cit. p. 56 ; Exposit. super 
Regulam, ibid. p. 57. Of. Golubovich, pp. 126-8. 

2 The exact time of Francis return to Italy is a matter of controversy. 
Golubovich (op. cit. p. 97) argues for March- April, 1221; Sabatier (Vie de S. 
Francois, p. 278), in the summer of 1220; Herman Fischer (Der heilige 
Franziskus von Assisi wtihrend der Jahre 1219-21, p. 20 seq.), in the early 
part of 1220. 

The facts we have to guide us in fixing the date are these : Francis was 
at Damietta in February, 1220; and afterwards visited Syria and went about 
there. Celano evidently implies that Francis spent some time in Syria, 
journeying through the country : " deinde Syriam deambulans " (I Celano, xx. 
in capite). But Elias, who accompanied Francis back to Italy, was succeeded in 
the Provincialate of Syria by Luca di Puglia before 9 December, 1220. Of. 
Sbaralea, Bull. Franc, i. p. 6. Again it is noteworthy that the letter ad 
dressed by Honorius III to the Superiors of the Order on 22 September, 1220 
(Sbaralea, op. cit. i. p. 6) is not addressed to Francis by name, as is usual 
in similar letters, but simply : Dilectis filiis prioribus sen custodibus Minorum. 
This, however, is hardly a conclusive argument. But we know that Peter 
Cathanii died at the Porziuncula on 10 March, 1221. Golubovich assumes 
that Peter must have returned to Italy before Francis ; but Giordano da Giano, 
who relates these events in detail, says Francis took Peter, Elias, and Caesar 
with him on his return (Anal. Franc, i. no. 14, p. 5). The probability, there 
fore, is that Francis returned in the September sailings of 1220. 



16 



CHAPTEE IV. 
THE REVOLT OF THE VICARS. 

WE must now go back upon the past eighteen months and 
review the course of events which had happened amongst 
the brethren in Italy. 

Two incidents which followed almost immediately after 
the General Chapter of 1219 throw a clear, if reflected, light 
upon the controversy which had then arisen. On 11 June 
the Holy See issued commendatory letters to the brethren, 
designed to obtain for them the protection of the bishops in 
the various provinces into which they might be sent ; l on 
27 July, Cardinal Ugolino published his Constitutions 2 for 
the Poor Ladies, or as he styled them, the Poor Nuns of the 
Order of San Damiano. 3 

The acceptance by the brethren of the commendatory 
letter of Honorius III, was in distinct opposition to the will 
of Francis : it was one of those changes in the conduct of 
the fraternity to which he could never be brought to give his 
assent. At the end of his days he wrote in his Testament : 
" I firmly command by obedience all the brethren wherever 

1 Bull " Cum dilecti" in Sbaralea, Bull. i. p. 2 ; Chron. xxiv. Gen., 
Anal. Franc, in. p. 14. 

2 Ugolino s Constitutions were dated " Perusii apud monasterium 8. 
Petri, VI Kal. Aug. a 1219. Cf. Bull " Sacrosancta Romana Ecclesia" of 
9 Dec., 1219 Sbaralea, Bull. i. p. 3. The full text of the Constitutions is 
found in the Bulls " Cum omnis " of 24 May, 1239 (Sbaralea, ibid. pp. 
263-7) and " Solet annuere " of 13 November, 1245 (ibid. pp. 394-9 : 
and with some modifications in the bull " Cum omnis " of 5 August, 1247 
(ibid. pp. 476-83.) Cf. The Life and Legend of the Lady St. Clare, Intro 
duction, ii, pp. 11-31. 

3 " Moniales pauperes," " Pauperes inclustz DamianiUe," " Moniales 
ordinis S. Damiani " were the varying styles used in the Papal bulls. 
(Sbaralea, Bull. i. pp. 36, 37, 62, 207, etc.). 

242 



THE KEVOLT OF THE VICAES 243 

they are that they dare not to seek any letter from the 
Koman Court, either by themselves or by any intermediary 
person, nor for a church nor for any other place, nor on pre 
text of teaching, nor on account of bodily persecution ; but 
wherever they are not received, let them flee into another 
land to live in penance with the blessing of God ". l After 
the failure of the missions in Germany in 1217, the question of 
asking the Pope to grant the brethren letters of protection 
had been mooted. Francis reply was invariably a passionate 
refusal. " You Friars Minor you know not the will of God 
and will not allow me to convert the whole world as God 
wills," he retorted on one occasion; " for I wish by holy 
humility and reverence first to convert the prelates; and 
these when they see our holy life and our humble reverence 
towards them, will themselves ask you to preach and convert 
the people ; and they will call the people to hear your preach 
ing better than your privileges which will only lead you to 
pride. . . . For myself I wish only this privilege from the 
Lord that I may never have any privilege from man, save only 
the privilege to do reverence to all and to convert mankind 
through obedience to our holy Rule, more by example than by 
word." 2 

If you ask why Francis stood so steadfastly against a mere 
precaution of apparently common prudence, the only answer 
is that Christ his Master had claimed no right or privilege for 
His disciples in this world, but had sent them forth shielded 
only with the Divine protection ; 3 and Francis loyalty bade 
him take the Gospel as literally as might be. 

That first letter of Honorius III was the beginning of the 
policy of protection with which the Holy See ever after 
fostered the Franciscan movement. In May of the following 
year the Pope sent a further letter, couched in stronger terms, 
to the bishops of France, who were still hesitating as to the 

1 Test. S. Franc, in Seraph. Legisl. Text. p. 268 ; Opuscula, p. 80. 

2 Spec. Perfect, cap. 50 ; Conformit. in Anal. Franc, iv. 471. Cf . Ubertino 
da Casale, in Erhle : Archiv. in. p. 53. 

3 Cf. Matt. x. 14, 23; Mark vi. 11; Luke ix. 5. It must be remem 
bered that Francis took these and similar passages as a direct personal com 
mission for himself and his brethren. 

16* 



244 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSISI 

orthodoxy of the new Order. 1 Moreover it became the custom 
for some of the cardinals to give letters of their own, for the 
better reception of the brethren on their missionary journeys. 2 
Undoubtedly this policy was favoured by Cardinal Ugolino. 
As he regarded the matter, the brethren might indeed gain 
much merit for their own souls and perhaps edify the people, 
by patience and meekness under trials. On the other hand, 
many of them would fail under too great a trial ; and too, 
through lack of this initial prudence, the Church in many 
parts would be deprived of the good example and preaching 
of the brethren. Francis faith was heroic : but not all men 
can be asked to practise heroic virtue. The wind must be 
tempered to the shorn lamb. Moreover the Cardinal was a 
legalist, trained in the law ; and he thought it only right that 
the brethren should show their credentials from the authority 
which sent them forth to preach. The fraternity needed 
this legal sanction and direction if it were to be of use to the 
Church. Without such legal sanction they were in danger 
of becoming mere vagrants in the world : a dangerous thing 
for most men. This same thought made the Cardinal en 
courage a more definite organization than yet existed in the 
fraternity. He favoured the brethren living in larger houses 
where regular life of a more conventual character could be 
observed. Until now the dwelling-places of the brethren had 
been of the humblest sort ; either hermitages partly fashioned 
out of rocky caves, as one finds to-day at Greccio, Monte 
Casale, the Celle near Cortona, and the Carceri near Assisi ; 
or they were wattle huts or a poor man s cottage. Always 
they were designed for only a few friars ; for Francis taught 
that his Lady Poverty could be rightly served only where the 
friars were few in number. 8 A conventual life, strictly so 
called, did not exist. The friar, though under obedience 
to a superior, was very much of a wanderer, alternating his 
missionary journeys with periods of retreat. " The itinerant 
minstrel of the Lord," was no bad description of him. But 

1 Bull " Pro dilectis filiis" Sbaralea, Bull. i. p. 5. Of. Anal. Franc, in. 
p. 14, n. 9. 

2 3Soc. 66. 3 II Celano, 70. 



THE EEVOLT OF THE VICARS 245 

now those directing the fraternity favoured a greater stability 
of community life. 1 The first step in this more rigid organi 
zation was a decree obtained from Honorious III, ordaining 
that in future no friar should be received to profession till 
after a year s probation ; that once professed, no friar should 
be allowed to pass over to another Order ; and that no friar 
might wander about without letters of obedience from his 
minister. 2 

The decree was certainly reasonable enough. Even such 
an enthusiastic admirer of the brethren as Jacques de Vitry 
foresaw danger in the lack of systematic training of the 
novices now that the friars were so numerous. 3 Unhappily 
the vicars did not confine themselves to such reasonable and 
necessary organization. 

As we have seen, they enacted constitutions the tendency 
of which was to introduce that monastic observance against 
which Francis had protested at the Chapter as contrary to 
the simplicity of the friar s vocation. The mere addition of 
an extra fasting day and the restriction in the use of flesh 
meat, might not be much in themselves ; but it is evident 
that they were but part of an attempt to change the proper 
character of the fraternity and supplant Francis ideal of 
a literal gospel observance by a more rigid legalist asceticism 
founded on the customs of more ancient Orders. Not un 
likely they had in view the Ugoline Constitutions for the 
Poor Ladies, and were influenced by them. These Constitu 
tions are in fact a document of the first value in tracing the 
development of the entire Franciscan family at this period. 

Briefly speaking, the Ugoline Constitutions reveal the 

J Of. P. Hilarin Pelder, Histoire des Etudes, p. 119 : " Toutefois, c etait 
Id encore Id periode de transition de la vie nomade d la stabilite". 

2 Bull " Cum secundum consilium," of 22 September, 1220. Sbaralea, 
Bull i. p. 6. 

3 Epistola " de captione Damiatce," edited by Rohricht in Zeitschrift fiir 
Kirchcngeschichte, 16, p. 72 : " Hec autem religio valdepericulosa nobis videtur, 
quod non solum perfecti, sed etiam juvenes ct imperfecti qui sub conventuali 
disciplina aliquo tempore arctari et probari debuissent, per universum mundum 
bini et bini dividuntur ". This passage, however, is wanting in the text 
edited by Bongars: Gesta Dei per Francos, torn. i. pp. 1146-9 (cf. Golubovich, 
op. cit. p. 7). 



246 LIFE OF ST. FEANCIS OF ASSIST 

legalist reformer endeavouring to capture the new religious 
enthusiasm evoked by Francis and to fasten it within the 
closest bonds of traditional asceticism. Upon the wings of 
that new fervour, perhaps, the writer of the Constitutions felt 
any burden might be borne. His ideal evidently was a 
monastic observance which would rival in its hardship and 
straitness the strictest of the ancient Eules. 

These Constitutions presupposed the profession of the 
Benedictine Rule, but further prescribed perpetual abstinence, 
continual silence, and the law of enclosure. They were 
altogether lacking in that " sweet reasonableness" which 
breathes in the legislation of the great monastic founders ; 
and certainly missed the liberty of spirit which animates the 
Eule of St. Benedict. They exhibit all the rigidity and harsh 
externalism of a rule meant to correct and guard against 
abuses, with none of the inspiring idealism which is the very 
life of a religious order. And from the point of view of the 
Franciscan fraternity, they were a reversal of the very 
essential law of the Franciscan life, in that they allowed 
the Poor Ladies to hold property. 

Ugolino had been influenced in drawing up these Constitu 
tions by the Cistercian customs ; 1 it is not unlikely that they 
were in reality the work of a Cistercian monk, to which the 
Cardinal gave his authority and sanction. Perhaps had he 
given the drafting of them to one of the brethren, the Ugo- 
line Constitutions would have been less foreign in spirit to 
the heart of Clare and the Sisters at San Damiano. As it 
was, to them the Constitutions was in truth "the great 
sorrow ". 2 

It is doubtful whether the Cardinal regarded the Poor 
Ladies, at least those outside San Damiano, as allied to 
the fraternity. They had no formal sanction from the 
Holy See, and most of the convents had been founded by 

1 He acknowledges this in the bull, " Licet velul ignis," of 9 February, 
1237 (cf. Sbaralea, Bull. i. p. 209). The first visitor of the Poor Ladies 
appointed by him was the Cistercian monk Ambrogio (cf. Sbaralea, Bull. I. 
p. 46 ; Wadding, Annales, ad an. 1219.) 

2 Cozza-Luzzi, S. Chiara di Assisi, p. 34. 



THE EEVOLT OF THE VICAEB 247 

himself in virtue of his Legatine powers. San Damiano 
might be in a somewhat different position : but even Clare 
had received no formal Rule. She had vowed to live in 
poverty as the brethren did ; beyond that she observed the 
Rule of the brethren as far as women might observe it. 
Her vow of poverty had been confirmed and protected by 
special privilege by Innocent III ; l but the Cardinal held 
that this privilege was personal to herself and the sisters at 
San Damiano, and was not to be taken as an obligation 
binding upon other Poor Ladies. 2 

At San Damiano therefore the sisters might, as a matter 
of privilege, observe absolute poverty ; but elsewhere they 
must hold property sufficient for their maintenance ; and the 
Cardinal himself saw to it that each convent had its due 
possessions. Already in 1218 Ugolino had obtained per 
mission from the Holy See to found convents and endow 
them : 3 these convents were to be the nucleus of his scheme 
of reform, and he looked to San Damiano to supply the 
needed fervour in the persons of the abbesses whom it 
would send to these new houses and to existing communities 
which were to adopt the Ugoline reform : for many of the 
early convents which looked to San Damiano as in some sort 
their mother house, were reformed communities of the Bene 
dictine and other Orders. 4 

The convents of the Poor Ladies, therefore, outside San 
Damiano, were not purely Franciscan in their origin ; and 
perhaps it was for that reason that Francis never claimed 
jurisdiction over them in the same way as he did over San 
Damiano : 5 but Clare herself was staunch in urging that 

1 Vide supra, p. 144. 

2 Of. Letter " Angelis Gaudium" which Ugolino as Gregory IX sent to 
Blessed Agnes of Prague, 11 May, 1238, Sbaralea, Bull. i. 242. 

a Of. Bull " LittercB tua " of 7 August, 1218, Sbaralea, ibid. p. 1. 

4 e.g. San Severino in the Marches of Ancona ; Spello and Monticelli near 
Florence. 

5 Wadding (Annales, ad an. 1219) states that Francis before going to the 
East had given over the direction of all convents of Poor Ladies, except San 
Damiano, to Cardinal Ugolino ; but there is no evidence that he ever regarded 
such convents, e.g. San Severino, as quite in the same relationship to him as 
San Damiano. It is certain that in some instances he appointed brethren to 



248 LIFE OF ST. FRANCIS OF ASSISI 

they should all be allowed to observe absolute poverty, and 
be made akin to the fraternity if they so willed. 1 Probably 
"the great sorrow" with which Clare received the Ugoline 
Constitutions was not merely for the sisters who were directly 
affected by them, but for the whole fraternity ; her keen 
intuition would tell her how the new ordinances would in 
fluence the brethren too. Indeed there can be little doubt 
that the Vicars were so influenced when they drew up the 
Constitutions which spread consternation amongst the true 
followers of Francis. 

The disloyalty of the Vicars to the mind of Francis went 
near to breaking up the fraternity. Their Constitutions at once 
called forth an active opposition on the part of those who 
were imbued with the primitive spirit ; and this opposition 
the Vicars, and the Ministers who sided with them, met with 
violent repression. "Not only were they [the opposition] 
afflicted with unjust penances, but as men of evil mind they 
were cast out from the community of the brethren . . . Many 
fleeing from fury, wandered about here and there, bewailing 
the absence of their pastor and guide." 2 Moreover, having 
broken the bond of loyalty which hitherto had kept the fra 
ternity in subjection, the Ministers found themselves unable 
to hold the wayward spirits in restraint. Some openly threw 
off their obedience and went their own way. 

Thus one brother, John de Compello, put himself at the 
head of a band of wandering zealots of the fanatical sort 
common at the time : they were all lepers, and of both sexes. 3 

act as spiritual directors of the Poor Ladies elsewhere e.g. he appointed 
Brother Roger to be the director of the Blessed Philippa at Todi (Wadding, 
Annales, ad an. 1236), but the close relationship of San Damiano with the 
fraternity seems to have been exceptional. 

1 Vide e.g. St. Clare s letters to Blessed Agnes of Prague, Ada SS. Mart. 
vol. i. pp. 505-7, transl. by Mrs. Balfour, The Life and Legend of the Lady St. 
Clare, pp. 138-54. 

2 Angelo Clareno, Hist. VII Tribulat. Golubovich, p. 56. Cf. Chron. 
Jordanian Anal. Franc, i. n. 13, p. 4. : " Eodem tempore juit ultra, mare pytho- 
nissct qudedam . . . Redite redite quia per absentiam fratris Francisci ordo tur- 
batur et scinditur et dissipatur. Et hoc verum fuit." 

3 Chron. Jordani, in Anal. Franc, i. n. 13, p. 4. Lempp s contention (Frere 
Elie, p 42) that this movement was an attempt to organize the lay penitents 



THE EEVOLT OF>THE VICAES 249 

Another made himself a pilgrim s habit and went wandering 
about exhibiting himself as a fool for humility s sake. 1 At 
first on his return Francis hardly realized the mischief that 
had been done. He lingered a few days at Venice, whither 
the boat had brought him. He was suffering in body as well 
as in mind, for his journeys in the East had sorely tried his 
delicate health. One little comfort he had here. Walking in 
the marshes through the thickets, he came upon a multitude 
of birds singing gaily. Whereupon he said to the brother 
who was with him : " our sisters the birds are praising their 
Creator ; let us go into the midst of them and chant our hours 2 
to the Lord " and at their coming the birds were not dis 
turbed or frightened. But finding the voices of the birds 
distracting, Francis after a time bade them be silent until he 
had fulfilled his debt to the Lord. Then when the office was 
said, Francis gave them a sign, and they again began to sing. 3 
On the homeward journey Francis found the fatigue too 
much for his weakness and had perforce to ride on an ass. 
Brother Leonard, who trudged along on foot over the hot 
ground, envied him this comfort, and became mentally un 
reasonable and ill-tempered. " In the world," said he to 
himself, " my people would not walk beside the Bernardone, 
and here am I compelled to trudge behind his son whilst he 
rides". Leonard was of a noble family in Assisi. To his 
astonishment hardly was the complaint shaped in his mind 
when Francis dismounted and turned to him, saying : " Take 
my place, brother ; truly it is not becoming that I should ride 
whilst thou, who art of noble stock, should have to walk on 
foot ". But Leonard, in utter confusion and penitence, cast 

of the Franciscan movement, can hardly be seriously considered. John do 
Compello has been identified with John de Capella, one of the first twelve 
companions (cf. Anal. Franc, in. p. 4 ; Sabatier, Vie, p. 270) but this is very 
doubtful. The only apparent connexion between the two names is the state 
ment of Earth, of Pisa, that John de Capella died a leper. (Conformity in 
Anal. Franc, iv. p. 178). Cf. Manuscrit de Leignitz in Opuscules de Criti 
que, fasc. n. p. 49. 

1 II Celano, 32-33. He eventually returned to the order, 

2 " Hor& canon,iccc" i.e. the office of the Breviary. 

3 Leg. Maj. vin. 9 ; Wadding, Annales, ad. an. 1220. 



250 LIFE OF ST. FRANCIS OF ASSISI 

himself at Francis feet. 1 So with their primitive simplicity 
for their comforter, they went on until they came to 
Bologna ; and here Francis had his first actual experience of 
the changes which had taken place. 

On approaching the city he was informed that the 
brethren had built a large convent there ; and hearing the 
description of it, Francis was smote to the heart. It ap 
peared to him a sign manual of the betrayal of the vocation 
of the fraternity. Peter Stacia, 2 the provincial of Lom- 
bardy, 3 was himself a doctor of law of the University of 
Bologna, and he had built the convent as a study-house for 
the brethren. Compared with the buildings hitherto used by 
the fraternity, the convent was spacious ; 4 but the worst 
feature in the eyes of Francis was that the Provincial in 
some way claimed it as the property of the Order, or at least 
allowed it to appear that he did so. Thus he had openly 
violated the Rule on two essential points : he had departed 
from the absolute poverty in which the fraternity was 
founded, and he had set at nought that evangelical simplicity 
which was the other self of poverty. It would seem too that 
Peter Stacia had acted in deliberate disregard of the inten 
tions of Francis, drawn on by the desire to emulate the 
Dominicans who had opened a school at Bologna in 1219, 
the year that Francis had gone to the East. 5 Francis knew 
Bologna and the temper of its schools. When he had sent 
Bernard da Quintavalle there some years previously it had 
been to bear witness in its midst to the simplicity of the 
Gospel-mind against the intellectual hardness and conceit 
bred in its schools, where law and the literal arts were studied 

1 II Celano, 31 ; Leg. Maj. xi. 8. 

2 He is also called Joannes della Schiaccia (Conformit.iia.Anal. Franc, iv. 
p. 440), Joannes de Sciaca (Actus, cap. 61) ; Joannes do Strachia and Petrus 
Joannes de Strachia (Wadding, Annales, ad an. 1216, 1220. Petrus Stacia is 
the name given him by Angelus Clarenus, Hist. VI Tribulat). 

3 Cf. Golubovich, Series Provinciarum, in Arch. Franc. Hist. an. i. fasc. i. 
p. 3. 

4 Cf. Angelo Clareno, op. cit. : Hilarinus a Lucerna, Histoire des Etudes, 
p. 133, note 2. 

5 Cf. Jordanus de Saxonia, De initiisOrd. Praedicat., in Quetif-Echard, 
Scriptores Ord. Praedicat. i. p. 18. 



THE KEVOLT OF THE VICABS 251 

with an ostentatious disregard of theology and the study of 
Scripture. Probably Peter Stacia intended to include theo 
logy amongst the studies of the brethren ; perhaps even to 
open a theological school, such as was already winning 
applause for the Dominicans. 1 But Francis had no desire 
for theology of that sort, in which intellectual reasoning was 
more evident than the heart-study of the Gospel. Still it 
was not now a question of the study of theology, but the 
more fundamental question of the character and purpose of 
the fraternity. Were the brethren to abide in their original 
poverty and simplicity ? The new convent of Bologna was a 
direct negative : it was the announcement of a new spirit at 
variance with the spirit of that poverty which the brethren 
had vowed to serve. 2 That was the one clear fact which 
the heart of Francis grasped with piercing intuition. 

In indignant sorrow Francis refused to enter the convent, 
but went and sought a lodging with the Friars Preachers. 
There he pondered upon this betrayal which confronted him. 
Such an evil example must be met with dire chastisement. 
Summoning Peter Stacia to his presence, he upbraided him 
with aiming at the destruction of the fraternity and called 
down upon him the curse of heaven ; and he would have 
ordered all the brethren of the convent to do penance but 
that a Friar Preacher interceded for them. If they had 
done wrong, this friar urged, they had acted from lack of 
judgment, not from malice, and were willing to make repara 
tion. So Francis stayed his hand, and only bade them im 
mediately quit the convent : nor would he allow even some 
sick brethren who were there, to remain. 3 After that he 

1 Jacques de Vitry, Historia Occidentalis (Douai) p. 333. 

2 Had Peter Stacia gone so far in violation of the Rule as to collect money 
for the building ? I am inclined to think so. In the eighth chapter of the 
Rule of 1221, Francis emphatic and painstaking regulation that the brethren 
shall not collect money for houses or places, evidently implies that the Rule 
had been violated in this respect. It is a passionate utterance which a mere 
possible danger would not have evoked, but only an actual betrayal. And 
that would account for the curse which Francis called down upon the minister 
and which he would never revoke. 

3 II Celano, 58 ; Spec. Perfect, cap. 6 ; Actus, cap. 61 ; Conformity in Anal. 
Franc, iv. p. 440. 



252 LIFE OF ST. FEANCIS OF ASSISI 

continued his journey southwards, learning, as he went, all 
the sorrow that had come upon his brethren during his 
absence. 

Even amongst his earliest companions was found one at 
least who had fallen in with the new ways, Philip the Long, 
a man of undoubtedly holy life. He had been appointed 
Visitor of the Poor Ladies in succession to the Cistercian 
monk Ambrogio ; and had procured letters of protection for 
them from the Holy See, to safeguard them against trouble 
some bishops. 

Very quickly now the news of Francis return was carried 
throughout the provinces of the peninsula and brought to 
the brethren who had fled to mountain hermitages and hidden 
places to escape the persecution of the dominant party. To 
these suffering ones his appearance was like the breaking of 
day after a night of dread. 1 Somehow the rumour had gone 
abroad that he was dead : possibly it was a rumour born of 
the sufferings and fears of the brethren in the absence of 
news ; or it may have been a distorted echo of the martyr 
dom of the brethren in Morocco. But everywhere, as the 
news of his return was passed from place to place, a great 
cry of joy broke forth. 2 

Doubtless many of the persecuted brethren dreamed that 
now things would be again as they were before the Vicars 
had brought trouble into the fraternity. Francis, however, 
gauged the situation more accurately. A great betrayal had 
happened : but he was clearly aware that things could not be 
quite as they were before. Simplicity of faith and unity of 
purpose no longer held the brethren in an easy obedience. 
The dominant party at least were not satisfied with his 

1 According to Wadding (Annales, ad an. 1220) Francis met Cardinal 
Ugolino at Bologna, and went with him to a Camaldulese monastery near 
Alvernia, where they passed some time in retreat. Upon this statement M. 
Sabatier builds the theory that the Cardinal purposely kept Francis out of 
the way whilst the ministers were carrying out the Cardinal s policy (Vie de 
S. Francois, pp. 277-8). But there is no authentic evidence that Francis 
went to Alvernia at this time ; nor does it appear from the Registri that the 
Cardinal was at Bologna in 1220, though he was undoubtedly there in 1218, 
1219, and 1221 (cf. H. Fischer, Dcr licilige Franziskus, p. 67). 

2 Chron. Jordani, in Anal. Franc. I. no. 14, p. 5. 



;iia^ 




PRIMITIVE FRANCISCAN HERMITAGE 

(Grotto of Soffiano) 



THE EEVOLT OF THE VICAES 253 

guidance, and never would be : they were shielding them 
selves behind the patronage of those in high places. One 
conclusion was clear to his simple soul : the fraternity needed 
a ruler who would govern the recalcitrant brethren in a more 
masterly fashion than he himself could. It was not in him 
to act " the sergeant of the Lord " and coerce men ; if the 
brethren would not follow him freely, he was not the leader 
for them. 1 Yet it was on his conscience to do what he could 
to save this child of his love, as the fraternity was to him. In 
his perplexity his thoughts turned to Cardinal Ugolino as the 
man whom God had destined to foster by his authority in the 
Church, this family of His. Straightway therefore he turned 
his steps towards Eome. 2 He avoided meeting the Vicars on 
the way : 3 his appeal was to the Holy See. 

Arrived in the Eternal City, Francis went to the Lateran 
palace and sat down upon the ground outside the door of the 
Pope s chamber to await his coming out, too humble to seek 
admittance. When at length the Pope came forth, Francis 
greeted him : " Father Pope, God give thee peace ! " and the 
Pontiff replied : " God bless thee, my son " ; and awaited his 
request. " My lord," said Francis, "because you are so great 
and busy with affairs of great movement, the poor cannot often 
have access to you, nor can they speak with you as often as 
there is need." And when Honorius reminded him that there 
were cardinals and bishops to whom he could have recourse, 
Francis exclaimed : " you have given me many popes ; I 
beseech you give me one with whom as necessity arises I may 
speak and seek counsel in your stead concerning the affairs of 
my Order ". " Whom do you wish that I should give thee, 
my son? "asked the Pope. " Give me," said Francis, the 
lord Cardinal of Ostia." And thus, according to one witness, 
Cardinal Ugolino became Protector of the fraternity at the 
Eoman Court. 4 

1 Chron. Jordani, in Anal. Franc, i. n. 14, p. 5. 

2 Honorius III was in Rome from November, 1220, till April, 1222. Pre 
viously to this he had been at Orvieto all the summer and early autumn of 
1220, save for a journey to Mantua at the end of July. Cf. Mon. Germ. Hist. 
torn. i. p. 83 seq. 

3 Spec. Perfect, chap. 71. 4 Chron. Jordani, ut supra. 



254 LIFE OF ST. FEANCIS OF ASSIST 

But others say that Francis first sought out Cardinal 
Ugolino and spoke to him his trouble ; and that the next 
morning the Cardinal took Francis with him to the Papal 
presence and bade him speak out before the Pope and 
cardinals what was in his mind : then afterwards it was that 
Francis had private audience with the Pontiff and proffered 
his petition that Cardinal Ugolino should be the ruler of the 
brethren as the Pope s vicegerent. 1 

However this may be, from this time the Cardinal became 
the constant adviser of Francis and his " apostolic lord " ; 2 
and it was his master-mind that directed the organization of 
the fraternity. 

His first acts were to compel John de Compello to 
disband his wandering community and return to his obedi 
ence, and to revoke the " letters of defence " granted to the 
Poor Ladies. This latter action is significant of the spirit in 
which he assumed his new office. As the supreme arbiter in 
the fraternity he consistently endeavoured to meet the 
wishes of Francis in as far as he could do so, having regard 
to what he considered the needful organization of the Order. 
He himself, as we have seen, was not an idealist but a man 
of affairs; yet there was that persistent element of mysti 
cism in his character which drew him to Francis more closely 
than many of the brethren were drawn. To him the ideas 
of Francis were never merely unpractical ideas but the in 
spiration which he sought to bring within the bounds of the 
practicable : and with infinite patience he set himself to bridge 
over the gulf which was widening between the mind of the 
founder and many of the new leaders of the brethren. Let 
justice be done to his memory. Not always did he see as St. 
Francis saw : yet he never deliberately offended against the 
trust Francis put in him. 

Francis did not leave Eome till he and the Cardinal had 

1 II Celano, 25 ; 3 Soc. 64-5. Cf. I Celano, 100. The point of agree- 
ment between the two narratives is found in 3 Soc. 65. Giordano evidently 
relates the final episode in this negotiation. Ugolino was in Borne in the 
winter of 1220-1. 

2 Cf. Spec. Perfect, cap. 23 : " Dominus et Apostolicus nosier"". 



THE EEVOLT OF THE VICAKS 255 

arrived at an understanding as to the course to be taken in 
regard to the fraternity. Peter Cathanii was reinstated at 
the Porziuncola as vicar l to administer the ordinary affairs 
of the brethren, whilst Francis was to concern himself with 
a revision of the Eule such as was needed to bring peace and 
order into the disturbance. The revision was to incorporate 
the experience which had been gained as to the government 
of the brethren. 

Not unlikely too the matter of the " letters of defence," 
led to a discussion of the relations between the brethren and 
the Poor Ladies, and that the Cardinal then recognized the 
distinct privileges attaching to San Damiano ; whilst at the 
same time he obtained Francis consent to brethren being ap 
pointed directors of other convents. 2 And, as I incline to 
think, one other weighty subject was then broached by the 
Cardinal, the organization of a new fraternity of lay-penitents 
for those men and women, and they were a great multitude, 
who had attached themselves to the brethren as informal 
followers of the gospel of poverty. 

Meanwhile messengers were sent to all the provinces of 
the Order to call the brethren to attend a general Chapter 
at the following Pentecost. But before the Chapter met 

1 It seems certain that the appointment of Peter Cathanii as vicar referred 
to in II Celano, 143, and Spec. Perfect, cap. 39, refers to an earlier period, at 
a time when Francis was suffering from his recurring sicknesses. Both au 
thors say distinctly that it happened a few years after Francis conversion 
"paucis annis elapsispost conversionem suam ". 

2 According to Wadding (Annales, ad an. 1224) Francis in 1224 wrote a 
Rule for the Poor Ladies. But there is no evidence of any such rule except 
the Formula Vitae referred to by Gregory IX in his bull Angelis gaudium, of 
11 May, 1238 (Sbaralea, Bull. i. p. 242). This Formula Vitae is generally 
supposed to be contained in the sixth chapter of the Rule of St. Clare, ap 
proved by Innocent IV on 9 August, 1253 (Sbaralea, Bull. i. pp. 671-8 ; Seraph. 
Legislat. Text. p. 46 seq.). 

The probability is that Francis accepted the Ugoline Constitutions for the 
sisters at San Damiano, except as they allowed property. Certainly they 
were observed at San Damiano even in St. Francis lifetime, for he modified 
the rigidity of the fasts in favour of the weaker sisters (vide Epistola III S. 
Clarae ad B. Agnet. Boliem., Acta SS. Mart. torn. vii. p. 507). Moreover in 
the eventual Rule of St. Clare we find the Ugoline prescriptions of enclosure, 
perpetual fast, and silence maintained. 



256 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSISI 

Peter Cathanii died and Brother Elias, the late Minister- 
Provincial of Syria, was appointed in his stead. Peter died 
on 10 March, 1221. 1 One wonders how things might have 
gone with the brethren in the next few years had he lived 
to stand between Francis and the dissident ministers, with 
his experience and loyalty : for he had governed the brethren 
at the Porziuncola for many years in the absence of Francis, 
except for that momentous absence in the East. He, too, like 
Cardinal Ugolino, was aware of the difficulty of maintaining 
a large multitude in the simplicity of the primitive days ; 2 
yet like the Cardinal, never lost his essential faith in Francis. 
But, as we have said, he died before the Chapter met. 

1 So reads the ancient inscription on the wall of the Porziuncola : " anno 
Dn.i MCCXXI id Martii cwpus fr. P. Catanii qiii hie requiescit migravit ad 
Dominum ". According to Chron. xxiv. Gen. in Anal. Franc, in. p. 30, Peter 
died in 1224 ; Papini (Storia di San Francesco, i. p. 187) interprets the above 
inscription as 10 March, 1222, on the ground that the common mediaeval 
mode of computation reckoned the beginning of the year from 25 March. 
But this is very uncertain. Moreover it was evident from Giordano da Giano s 
account of the Chapter of 1221, that Elias was then the virtual superior of 
the Order (Chron. Jordani, no. 17, in Anal. Franc, i. p. 6). 

2 IIGelano, 67. 



CHAPTEE V. 
BROTHER ELIAS ASSUMES THE GOVERNMENT. 

As one stands to-day in the plain facing Assisi and looks 
towards the city, the feature which most persistently holds 
the eye is not the mediaeval fortress crowning the hill nor 
anything amidst the cluster of bell-towers which lie beneath 
the hill s brow, but the great convent to the left where the 
mountain slopes steeply down to the river Tescio. Built 
upon a long line of great towering arches, because of the 
slope of the hill, the Sagro Convento at a distance looks 
more like a feudal fortress than a religious house. As you 
gaze upon it your thoughts turn for comparison to the for 
tress-churches, such as that of Durham, built and held by 
priest-soldiers, doughty men in Church and State. No 
matter how often you stand to gaze upon the city, nor with 
what intention, invariably that great convent-basilica, gleam 
ing white against the dark greyish hills, draws your eye to 
itself : and if you know and love Franciscan legend, a com 
plexity of emotion will as invariably distract you as you 
gaze. You will remember how that gleaming convent sym 
bolized to many of the followers of Francis a great betrayal ; 
how to others it seemed the appropriate expression of the 
world s homage to a great and well-loved saint. Perhaps in 
your own heart both sentiments will call for acknowledg 
ment ; you will be glad that the world gave of its magnifi 
cence and its noblest art in the building of a shrine which 
was to hold the body of him who deserved the world s best ; 
and yet inconsistently you will begrudge the world its share 
in him who loved poverty and nature more than wealth and 
art. And perhaps in the consciousness of your own complex 
feeling you will judge Brother Elias less harshly than some 

257 17 



258 LIFE OF ST. FRANCIS OF ASSISI 

have judged him, and with a greater truth. For this vast 
pile of buildings owes its origin and design to that Brother 
Elias who became Vicar-General of the Order after the death 
of Peter Cathanii. In a sense it is the monument of his 
genius and the expression of his character : though not alto 
gether. Beyond the confines of Umbria, close to the city of 
Cortona is the convent of the Celle, nestling lily-of-the- 
valley-wise beside a running stream at the base of a ravine. 
That, too, was built by Elias ; and the low narrow building, 
wherein a tall man can hardly stand upright, reveals another 
cast of character. 1 Yet more or less rightly, the Sagro 
Convento has been taken to express the mind and life-pur 
pose of the man who had now become the administrator of 
the fraternity. The Celle of Cortona represent only a trans 
ient, unfulfilled emotion : the Assisian Convent and Basilica 
stand for the man. 

It is at once a great achievement and a failure. In itself 
it is so subtly woven of gracefulness and strength : laughing 
to scorn, as it does, the hindrances which the site first put in 
the way of its construction 2 and rising from the declivities 
in beauteous freedom. Truly a noble example of art ; yet 
lacking the supreme glory of art ! Did it but show in its superb 
strength some feeling for the sublime unworldliness which 
it professes to honour, it would have been a perfectly congru 
ous expression of the world s homage. But the building 
conveys no such feeling ; it reveals no aspiration towards 
what itself is not. It is essentially self-contained, demand 
ing attention not for what it is not, but for what it is. It 
makes no humble confession of the greater glory of him 
whose body it enshrines ; rather it claims his glory as an 

1 Salimbene nevertheless blames him for choosing so delightful a spot to 
dwell in. Op. cit. p. 104. 

2 The Colle d Inferno on which the convent stands was separated from 
the city by a deep ravine ; and the underground tomb had to be hewn out of 
solid rock. Early prints still show the city and convent thus separated ; and 
M. Sabatier is of opinion that one gained admittance to the convent by 
means of two drawbridges thrown across the ravine which would give a still 
greater similarity to a fortress. Of. Selincourt, Homes of the First Francis 
cans, p. 22, n. 2. 



BEOTHEE ELIAS ASSUMES GOVEENMENT 259 

appanage of its own. And so the Sagro Convento perfect 
in most things that make for perfection in art bears a mark 
of insincerity and vanity ; and whilst its beauteous strength 
dominates your senses, your soul is apt to be depressed : a 
sense of tragedy falls upon you at first you hardly know 
why. 

Much the same complexity of feeling and the same final 
emotion comes to one in looking back upon Elias himself. 1 
There is a certain fascination in the broad sweep of his ambi 
tion, in the strength of purpose which made him, the son of 
an artisan, become the trusted counsellor and ambassador of 
pope and emperor and the virtual ruler of the citizens of 
Cortona. He went far towards making the Franciscan Order 
a world-power, throwing its influence into the whirl of politics 2 

1 For the story of Brother Elias, of. P. Affo, Vita difrate Elia ; Ed. Lempp, 
Frdre Elie de Cortone ; Golubovich, Biblioteca, p. 106 seq^. et alibi. Unfortun 
ately the materials for the story of Elias are not abundant, and one has to 
take the personal opinions of his contemporaries regarding him with due allow 
ance for the strong feeling he excited amongst both friends and adversaries. 
The early chroniclers of the Order, from a comprehensible delicacy, avoided 
mentioning him except with the briefest references : and so, though the main 
outlines of his character and policy stand out clearly in history, there is a 
lack of detail, which leaves much scope for subjective theories concerning his 
motives and even the details of his story. There has been much speculation 
as to the date and place of Elias birth. According to P. Affo he was born at 
Beviglia a short distance from Assisi. In the earliest chronicles he is simply 
styled Brother Elias without further designation ; the Chron. xxiv. Gen. 
(Anal. Franc, in. p. 249) is the first to style him Prater Helias de Assisio ; 
by which appellation he was known until the seventeenth century, when the 
custom arose of calling him Elias of Cortona, from his place of sepulture. 

An inscription on his tomb in the Church of San Francesco, Cortona, in 
the sixteenth century, described him as "Helias Coppi di Cortona". Cf. 
Anon. Gorton, pp. 36 and 75, in Lempp, p. 36, n. 3. Salimbene, who was 
received into the Order by Elias in 1238, says his father came from Castel 
Britti in the territory of Bologna and his mother from Assisi ; he further tells 
us that Elias was styled Bonusbaro or Bombarone. Cf. Mon. Germ. Hist. 
xxxii, pars i, p. 96. 

2 e.g. he sent Haymo of Faversham to Nicea to negotiate for the reunion 
of the Greek and Latin churches (Wadding, Annales, ad an. 1232-33 ; Eccles- 
ton[ed. Little], p. 35) ; he intervened between belligerent Italian parties in the 
cause of peace (of. Lempp, p. 107 ; Appendice n. 2). He himself acted as 
ambassador of Gregory IX in negotiating with Frederic II (cf. Salimbene, op. 
cit. p. 98). See also Huillard-Breholles, Hist. Diplom. v. pars i. p. 346, 

17* 



260 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSIST 

and into the intellectual life of the rising universities 1 and 
into the mission-fields of Moslem territory. 2 

He was undoubtedly a man of intellectual culture. He 
had studied at the University of Bologna, and had acquired 
not merely the legal knowledge necessary to practise as a 
notary, but a taste for the arts ; and if tradition be true, he 
was even attracted to the mysteries of the alchemist. 8 And 
not only had he a rare mental ability, but in his bearing with 
others he could be gracious in a large and magnificent way, 
and he had the gift of winning men s confidence and attach 
ing them to his person. But here perhaps one discovers his 
weakness. For those who gained his goodwill he had an 
abundant kindness which showed itself in frequent atten 
tions and timely service ; but those who withstood him he 
crushed, when he could, with no hesitation ; and those who 
were useless to him he passed by with indifference. He 
ruthlessly scourged and imprisoned those who protested 
against his policy after Francis death, even though they had 
been the special friends of Francis : 4 and as the years went on 
he developed an uncontrollable temper ; 5 he could baulk no 
opposition. When his purposes were thwarted he pitted him 
self in violence first against the brethren who withstood him ; 
then against the Pope who censured him. Finally, after be 
ing drawn into the Imperial service and leading the em 
peror s embassies, he retired into comparative seclusion in 
the city of Cortona where the people worshipped him : and 

1 Eccleston [ed. Little], pp. 35, 62. Vide Salimbene s famous dictum : 
" Hoc solum habuit bonumfr. Helios, quia ordinem fr. minorum ad studium 
theologiae promovit " (op. cit. p. 104). 

2 He sent missionaries to Georgia, Damascus, Bagdad, Morocco, Tunis, 
and Aleppo. Of. Sbaralea, Bull. i. pp. 93, 100, 102, 106, 155, etc. Cf. Golu- 
bovich, op. cit. p. 113-4. 

3 Cf. Eccleston, p. 36 ; Chron. xxiv. Gen. in Anal. Franc, in. p. 217 and 
p. 695. Matthew of Paris (Chron. ad an. 1239) says Elias was a renowned 
preacher. Several works on alchemy have been attributed to him, but they 
probably belong to the alchemist, Elias Canossa. Cf. Salimbene, op. cit. 
p. 160 ; Lempp, p. 121 ; Golubovich, op. cit. 116-7. 

4 Cf. Eccleston [ed. Little], p. 36 ; Chron. xxiv. Gen. in Anal. Franc, in. 
p 89 seq. ; Angelo Clareno, Hist. VII Trib. in Golubovich, op. cit. pp. 118-9. 

5 Cf. Eccleston, p. 84. Salimbene, op. cit. p. 104 seq. 



BEOTHEE ELIAS ASSUMES GOVEENMENT 261 

though an outcast from the Order and excommunicated by 
the Church, he spent his last years building a large church 
under the title of St. Francis, in which he himself was event 
ually buried : and to-day that church still stands in Cortona 
bearing witness to a life s failure : and the atmosphere of 
failure is in the place, so cold and spiritless it stands. But 
down in the ravine, the lowly Celle is still alive with fragrant 
inspiration. 

In judging Elias one must never forget the Celle, even 
though he himself at the last seems to have despised it. 

Truly a complex character was this man and not to be 
lightly judged : one predestined by his weakness to fail and 
by his strength to come very near to positive greatness. 

One would wonder what could have induced Elias to 
become a Friar Minor, did not one remember the humble 
Celle. Undoubtedly he had in him some germ of heroic self- 
denial ; and if his graciousness was apt to degenerate into 
patronage, yet he was not without sincere emotions of attach 
ment, as is evident from the letter he wrote to Gregory of 
Naples, the Minister of France, in which he announced the 
death of Francis. 1 Doubtless it was the evidences of these 
qualities, joined with his marked business capacity, which 
won Francis confidence. That the appointment of Elias to 
be Vicar-General was due to the suggestion of Cardinal 
Ugolino is not unlikely : yet it is certain that Francis gave to 
Elias, if not an intimate affection, which we may doubt, at 
least a high reverence ; 2 and I do not question that the selec 
tion of Elias as vicar was in harmony with Francis own 
wish. This we know, that he had chosen him as one of his 
companions on his return from Syria, together 1 with Peter 
Cathanii and Caesar of Speyer, both of whom were Francis 
confidants in his time of trouble. 3 In truth it may have 
seemed to both Francis and the Cardinal, that Elias with his 

1 Cf. Ada SS. Octob. n. p. 668. 

2 There is more than a courtier s flattery or a litterateur s fine phrase in 
Celano s saying : u f rater Helias qiwm loco matris elegerat si&i," etc. (I Celano, 
98). Tradition as well as history shows that Francis held Elias in respect, 
even though he came to suspect his policy, and detect his weakness. 

3 Caesar of Speyer assisted Francis to revise the Rule. Vide infra, p. 263. 



262 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

personal austerity and graciousness, his zeal and ability, was 
the desired peacemaker between the two parties in the fra 
ternity : and to the Cardinal, Ellas thoughtful solicitude for 
Francis in his bodily weakness would be an additional re 
commendation. 1 Yet it was a sad day for the brethren when 
Elias became vicar. In him the spirit of secularism, sullenly 
clamouring for recognition since the Chapter of 1217, devel 
oped a Titanic force within the fraternity which his ability 
wrested in large measure from its original purpose. He 
gave the brethren place and power in the world ; his genius 
gained for them political and ecclesiastical consideration ; he 
might have made them even more than he did, a vast politi 
cal organism, but that the primitive instinct of the fraternity 
proved too strong for him and rebelled and at last over 
whelmed him. Even then he was not altogether overcome ; 
and in his self-chosen seclusion in Cortona, when his disap 
pointed days were drawing to a close, he perhaps found some 
cynical satisfaction in the thought that those who had 
wrought his fall could not escape from the legacy he had left 
them, but must accept it even though some of them might 
groan at the gift. 

All this eventual tragedy is as yet to come. At the time 
of his appointment as Vicar, most of the brethren hoped that 
he would be Francis staff in his declining health and the 
comfort of the brethren. 

The general Chapter assembled at the Porziuncola in the 
closing days of May, 1221 : 2 three thousand brethren includ 
ing the novices, it is reckoned, were present. 3 Cardinal 
Ugolino was in the north of the peninsula and could not 
attend : Cardinal Bainerio, governor of the duchy of Spoleto, 
therefore presided. On the opening day a bishop sang the 
Mass. Francis assisted as deacon and afterwards preached, 
taking for his text the words of the Psalmist, " Blessed be the 



legends prove that Elias showed an anxious care for Francis 
physical health. Cf. I Celano, 98, 105; Spec. Perfect, cap. 115; Chron. 
Jordani, in Anal. Franc, i no. 17, p. 6. 

2 Pentecost fell in 1221 on 30 May. 

3 Chron. Jordani, in Anal. Franc, i. no. 16, p. 6. 



BEOTHEE ELIAS ASSUMES GOVEBNMENT 263 

Lord, my God, who teacheth my hands to fight : " l a fitting 
text surely for the occasion. 

Francis met the Chapter with the purpose of reasserting 
the primitive vocation of the fraternity. Upon the advice of 
Cardinal Ugolino, he had re-written the Eule with the as 
sistance of Brother Caesar of Speyer. This revised Eule he now 
submitted to the Chapter for its acceptance. If the dissident 
brethren had expected any modification of the original pro 
gramme of the fraternity, they were now much disappointed. 
The primitive Eule was maintained intact : but it was am 
plified by the addition of certain capitular decrees and papal 
enactments and by a number of admonitions with which 
Francis sought to strengthen the brethren in the life he would 
have them live. 2 Such additional precepts which the revised 
Eule contained concerning poverty and the simplicity of 
Gospel observance, did but emphasize the manner of life of 
the first days and were all in the spirit of the primitive Eule. 
Thus the brethren were forbidden to meddle in the temporal 
affairs of the novices or to receive any of their goods except in 
cases of real necessity, when they might accept a share "like 
other poor "; 3 the precept of manual labour remained, but 
to emphasize the menial character of the service the brethren 
should perform, they were forbidden to be chamberlains or 
cellarers or overseers in the houses of others ; nor might they 
accept any employment which would give rise to scandal or 
be injurious to their souls. 4 Whoever came to be received 
into the fraternity, be he friend or foe, thief or robber, is to 
be received kindly and made welcome. 5 The brethren must 
avoid appearing " sad and gloomy like hypocrites," but they 

1 Chron. Jordani, in Anal. Franc, i. The text is from Psalm CXLIII. 1 
(Vulgate). 

2 Vide infra, Appendix i, p. 393 That Francis was accustomed to submit a 
draft of his proposed legislation to the General Chapters is certain (cf. Epis- 
tola m. in Opuscula, p. 109 ; II Celano, 128). We may take it therefore that 
the revised Rule was submitted to the General Chapter at least in rough draft. 
It is, however, not unlikely that Csesar of Speyer gave it a more literary 
finishing, and added the quotations from Scripture and the Fathers, after the 
Chapter, with a view to submitting the Rule to the Holy See for approbation. 
Caesar remained for nearly three months " in the valley of Spoleto" after the 
Chapter. Cf. CJiron. Jordani, Anal. Franc, i. no 19. p. 8. 

3 Regula i. cap. 2. 4 cap. 7. 5 ibid. 



264 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

" must bear themselves as joyful and merry and becomingly 
gracious "- 1 They are to confess their sins if possible to a 
priest of the Order, but if this be not possible, to some other 
priest ; and if a priest is not at hand they shall confess to a 
brother who is not a priest, though afterwards they must seek 
absolution from a priest. 2 These regulations were not new 
but had already been imposed in former Chapters : 3 and 
so probably were the declarations that no brother should 
ride on horseback except in case of necessity, and that beasts 
of burden were not to be kept in the places where the brethren 
reside : 4 also that no brother should preach without licence 
from his minister. 5 Probably too the enactments concerning 
missons to the infidels were but a repetition of a rule made at 
the Chapter of 1219. 6 But there were other precepts which 
it seems evident arose out of the trouble of the past two years. 
Thus, no brother is allowed to receive vows of obedience 
from any woman ; 7 the ministers are forbidden to assume 
the title of prior. 8 Twice the revised Eule asserts " the liberty 
of the Gospel " in regard to the food of the brethren : " they 
may eat of all foods which are placed before them, according 
to the Gospel" ; and again, "whensoever necessity shall 
arise, it is lawful for all the brothers, wherever they may be, 
to eat of all foods that men may eat ". 9 

One regulation recalls the treatment meted out by the 
dissident ministers to the brethren who had opposed them in 
Francis absence in the East : " If one of the ministers," says 
the Kule, " shall command any of the brothers anything con 
trary to our life or against his soul, the brother is not bound 
to obey him, because that is not obedience in which a fault 
or sin is committed." 

Moreover, the ministers "who walk according to the 
flesh and not according to the spirit " are to be admonished 
by the brethren and if they do not amend, they are to be re 
ported to the General Chapter. 10 

In the regulations forbidding the collection of money 

1 Regula i. cap. 7. 2 cap. 20. 

3 Of. Spec. Perfect, cap. 66 : Actwt, cap. 29 : II Celano, 128 ; ibid, 175. 

4 Regula i. cap. 15. 5 cap. 17. cap. 16. 
7 cap. 12. 8 cap. 6. 9 cap. 3, 9. 10 cap. 5. 



BEOTHEK ELIAS ASSUMES GOVEENMENT 265 

"for certain houses or places" one hears an echo of the 
scandal at Bologna. 1 Finally the conclusion of the Eule 
reiterates Francis protest at the preceding General Chapter : 
" On the part of Almighty God and of the Lord Pope and by 
obedience, I, Brother Francis, strictly command and enjoin 
that no one take away from these things that are written in 
this life or add anything written to it over and above ; and 
that the brethren have no other Eule ". 2 

The revised Eule was not a treaty of peace : it was a 
challenge thrown down to those who would change the vo 
cation of the fraternity ; and as such it was taken by the 
dissident ministers. It is evident they had no intention of 
observing it. The legal-minded amongst them held that until 
the Eule was formally sanctioned by the Holy See, Francis 
had no authority to impose it and could not therefore bind the 
brethren in conscience to abide by it. 3 

The Eule in fact hit them hardly. One minister came to 
Francis and asked him what was meant by the words: 
" When the brothers go about through the world, let them 
carry nothing by the way, neither bag nor purse nor bread," 
etc. 4 Francis unflinchingly replied : " I will have them under 
stood thus: the brethren must have nothing besides their 
habit, cord and breeches, and as it is said in the Eule, those 
who are compelled by necessity, may have shoes ". "What 
then shall I do ? " asked the minister thinking of his portable 

1 Regula i. cap. 8. 

2 The insertion of the words " and of the Lord Pope " may merely mean 
that Francis was enjoining the observance of the Rule in virtue of the authority 
given him by the Pope Innocent III, when the primitive Rule was approved. 
But it may bo that the phrase was inserted with a view to submitting the Rule 
for formal approbation either to the Cardinal-Protector, the Pope s represent 
ative, or directly to the Holy See. 

3 Vide infra, p. 319. The question as to how far Francis could legis 
late for the brethren apart from the consent of the ministers continued to be 
debated until 1230, when Gregory IX in the bull Quo elongati (cf. Sbaralea, 
Bull i. pp. 68-70) declared that the brethren were not held by obedience to 
obey regulations made by Francis without the consent of the ministers, that 
is, the General Chapter. That was of course a correct legal view. But 
Gregory added that the brethren should in every way be ready to conform 
themselves to Francis reasonable intentions and holy wishes. 

4 Regula i. cap. 14. 



266 LIFE OF ST. FEANCIS OF ASSISI 

library ; " for I have many books the which are valued at fifty 
pounds." Francis exclaimed: " Brother, I must not and 
cannot go against my conscience and the profession of the 
holy Gospel which we have promised to observe ". At this 
the minister grew very sad. Francis continued passionately : 
" you brethren who wish to be called Friars Minor by the 
people and to appear to them observers of the Gospel and 
yet in fact would have your treasure-chests ! But I am not 
going to lose the Book of the Gospel for the sake of your 
books. Do as you will ; but never shall my permission be 
made a snare to the brethren." 1 That "Do as you will" 
became very much the despairing cry of Francis in the face 
of the continued opposition of the dissident ministers. He 
could not coerce them to follow his lead ; he could only go 
on bearing witness to the truth which he held to have been 
given him by Christ Himself. Let those walk with him 
who would ; for the others he disclaimed responsibility. 
These on their part at once set to work against the Eule ; not 
as yet clamorously but nevertheless persistently. Cardinal 
Ugolino was appealed to. To a large extent he was in sym 
pathy with them, only he would not have them openly and 
truculently offend Francis. With a statesman s acumen he 
sought to give effect to what he considered their reasonable 
demands whilst yet keeping intact the essential principles of 
the Eule. Thus in the matter of the house at Bologna, he 
publicly declared that the building belonged to the Holy See 
and was not the property of the brethren ; and upon this con 
dition induced Francis to consent that the brethren should 
return to it and live there. 2 

There can be no doubt that Brother Elias was a consent 
ing party to the opposition excited by Francis reassertion of 
the primitive Eule and his literal adhesion to it. But whilst 

1 Spec. Perfect, cap. 3 ; II Celano, 62 ; Scripta F. Leonis, Doc. Antiqua, 
ed. Lemmens, pars i. pp. 86-7. Of. Hilarin de Lucerne, Histoire des Etudes, 
pp. 87-91. 

2 The Cardinal was in Bologna in the beginning of August, 1221, when he 
officiated at the funeral of S. Dominic. Acta SS., August i. p. 376. It was 
probably about this time that he made this public declaration to the citizens 
of Bologna. 



BEOTHEK ELIAS ASSUMES GOVEBNMENT 267 

others boldly and with less reverence uttered their complaints 
and declared their intentions, Elias had recourse to a more 
subtle diplomacy. In truth he feared to offend Francis. 
Something in his acknowledged leader perhaps the holiness 
of the saint, perhaps the very fearlessness of the man, maybe 
both qualities daunted him. Elias s policy, grounded at 
least in part in reverence for Francis, was to gain his confi 
dence and be the friend. His reasoning went wholly with 
the dissident ministers but his heart was yet held by a certain 
reverential affection for him whose vicar he was. Moreover 
it may be doubted whether Elias altogether approved of the 
independence of the ministers. It was not in his character 
to tolerate a divided authority : by instinct he was the auto 
crat ; and though he might go some way with the ministers 
in their demands, he himself would be the master, as the 
ministers were to learn to their cost in the days to come. 1 
Elias s policy, therefore, was to temper the more violent 
clamours of the dissidents and to work such changes as he 
thought well under the authority of the Cardinal Protector 
and with a certain deference to Francis own will. And so it 
came about that this tragedy which was testing the vitality 
of the Order, was less apparent to the multitude of the brethren 
at the time than it is to us who look back. As a body they 
were hardly aware of the clashing of elemental purposes which 
was taking place. They knew that things were changing in 
this or that detail of government and that in some things the 
primitive simplicity was giving way to what they considered 
the demand of circumstance. But the surface of their life was 
but little ruffled. Such betrayals of principle which some of 
the brethren were guilty of, hardly affected the brethren as a 
whole. They were still a joyous company of God s trouba 
dours : the original idealism was perhaps somewhat abated, 
but enough of it remained to give them a marked distinction 
of character. The exuberant vitality of souls set free was 
still theirs ; they rejoiced in their poverty and were avid for 

1 Cf . Eccleston [ed. Little], pp. 79, 98 ; Salimbene (loc. cit. p. 105) says 
" Frequenter mutabat ministros ne nimis radicati fortius insurgerent contra 
ipsum ". 



268 LIFE OF ST. FEANCIS OF ASSIST 

adventure for Christ s sake. Perhaps with most of them 
Francis was becoming more of the saint and less of the 
leader; but that only gave them a greater pride in their 
vocation. One who looked back upon these days with 
wistful reminiscence wrote in his chronicle: "Who can ex 
press the charity, patience, humility and obedience, and the 
fraternal merriment there was amongst the brethren at that 
time?" 1 

Many of the brethren remembered this General Chapter 
not because of the disputes concerning the Eule but because 
of the adventure which marked its close. The Chapter had 
lasted seven days and was about to disperse when Francis be 
thought him that nd provision had been made to send brethren 
to Germany. Accordingly the brethren were recalled. Un 
able himself to address them because the fatigues of the past 
week had utterly broken down his strength and he could hardly 
speak, Francis sat on the ground and bade Brother Elias ad 
dress the assembly and call for volunteers to undertake the 
new mission. Elias thus explained the intention of Francis : 
" Brothers, our brother says that there is a certain country, 
Germany, where dwell devout Christians, who as you know 
often pass through our country, with long staves in their 
hands and wearing great boots ; and they sing the praises of 
God and the saints as they go along, perspiring in the heat, 
to visit the tombs of the Apostles. But because when the 
brethren were sent to them once before they were treated 
badly, our brother does not wish to compel any brother to 
go thither again. Yet if any inspired by zeal for God and 
souls, be willing to go, he will give them a like obedience, 
nay, a more willing obedience, than he gives to those who go 
to the infidels beyond the seas. Let those who are willing 
stand up and draw apart." At once ninety brethren arose 
" offering themselves to death " ; so great was the terror that 
the Germans had struck into the hearts of the brethren by 
their treatment of the first mission. 

There was one brother, however, an Umbrian by birth, 
who was sent somewhat unwillingly, yet happily as it turned 

1 Chron. Jordani, in Anal. Franc, i. no. 16, p. 6. 



BEOTHEE ELIAS ASSUMES GOVEENMENT 269 

out. Having listened to the story of the martyrs of Morocco, 
he was bewailing his misfortune in not knowing any of them 
personally. Seeing now the ninety brethren draw apart, he 
looked at them with reverence and with a sense of satisfaction 
that in them he was gazing upon martyrs that were to be : 
for of their fate he had no doubt. Since his infancy he had 
been taught to pray that God would shield his faith from the 
heresies of the Lombards and his body from the ferocity of 
the Germans. But he was not content to look upon the 
martyrs from a distance : he wanted to know each one per 
sonally so that in after times he might claim acquaintance 
with them. He therefore rose up and went over to them 
and began asking each his name and birthplace. 

Now amongst them was one, a Fra Palmerio, a native of 
Apulia. When asked his name, he replied : " My name is 
Palmerio ; " then seizing his questioner, he added : " And since 
you are here, you too are one of us and must go with us ". 
" Not so," replied the other ; " I am not one of you nor have 
I any desire to go with you." But Palmerio held him fast 
whilst the other brethren were being nominated for the dif 
ferent provinces. In vain the captive brother protested, 
until he consented to leave his destiny to the decision of 
Brother Elias. But when Elias asked him if he wished to 
go to Germany or not, the brother hesitated : for he had 
been taught to go whither he was sent and not murmur ; 
and now he feared lest he might break this rule. Hesitatingly 
he replied : " I wish neither to go nor not to go ". And 
Elias bade him go. Thus Brother Giordano da Giano was 
sent to Germany. 1 He lived many years amongst the 
Germans and at last died amongst them in an honoured old 
age : and in his last years he dictated a chronicle in which 
he set down the story of his coming to Germany and the 
marvellous reverence with which this new mission was received 
there. In this same chronicle Giordano relates that when he 
knew Saint Francis in the flesh, he did not think him a 
perfect saint nor altogether free from human weakness, and 
that only after Francis canonization did he have a complete 

1 Chron. Jordani, in Anal. Franc, i nos. 17, 18, pp. 6-7. 



270 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSISI 

veneration for him : l a candid confession which explains 
much to the generations that have not known Francis in the 
flesh. 

The new mission to Germany was as eminently success 
ful as the first mission had been a failure. The success 
is to be attributed in the first place to the skilful leadership 
of Caesar of Speyer and to the fame he had already acquired 
amongst his countrymen. Not all the ninety brethren who 
offered themselves, were sent on the mission. Caesar took 
with him only twenty-five : twelve clerics and thirteen lay 
brothers. 

Of these several were Germans ; and amongst the clerics 
were men who were to become eminent in various ways. 
There were Giovanni di Carpine, the future explorer of 
Tartary ; Thomas of Celano, who was to write the biography 
of Francis ; Brother Barnabas a powerful preacher, besides 
that Giordano of whom we have spoken. They went their 
way, did these missionary friars, in that chivalrous spirit which 
prompted Francis and all true Franciscans, heedless of per 
sonal discomfort, adapting themselves unmurmuringly and 
courteously to all circumstances; courageous, venturesome, 
and merry : as Giordano s chronicle quaintly relates. In 
Caesar of Speyer the simplicity of the Franciscan spirit seems 
to have blended well with a trained intellect and a wide 
knowledge of the world ; as it did indeed in so many of the 
brethren of Northren Europe : perhaps it was due to the 
deeper loyalty and less mercurial temperament of the Teutonic 
race. 

1 Chron. Jordani, in Anal. Franc, no. 59, p. 18. 



CHAPTEK VI. 
THE THIRD ORDER. 

WE come now to events .in_fche_hi story of Francis, which will 
take us for awhile .apart- from the --ministers and all the 
troublous happenings of which they were the cause. This 
chapter will help to remind us that the story of Francis is 
not merely a story of the Friars Minor. These, as he him 
self said, were his "Knights of the Bound Table," taken 
from the ordinary avocations of the world s life to fulfil the 
quest of the Lord Christ. They were knights-errant, bound 
by their vows of errantry to have no fixed home on the earth. 

Then there were the Lady Clare and her sisters who had 
entered into the bond of this new chivalry, and in their se 
clusion were guarding the mirror in which the worshipful 
ideal of poverty was faithfully reflected, and keeping alight 
the sacred fire as all true damosels of chivalry should. 

But there were others in the highways and byways of the 
world, who were true liege-folk to this new order of things. 
They did not abandon their homes nor the common duties 
of domestic life ; they still, most of them, maintained their 
position in society, according to the rank in which they were 
placed. Some of them indeed established themselves in a 
certain moral seclusion from the surrounding life in which 
they perforce must keep a foothold ; a few left the world and 
retired into solitary places, 1 fired by the teaching of Francis, 
yet without formally entering his fraternity. This more or 
less informal following of Francis and Clare 2 had grown up 

1 e.g. the recluse Praxedis (vide Celano, Tract, de Mirac. 181). 

2 The author of the legend of St. Clare speaks of the numbers of women 
who sought to imitate her example in their own homes. Of. Leg. S. Clara, 
10 b ; Mrs. Balfour, Life and Legend, p. 50 ; F. Paschal Robinson, Life of 
St. Clare, p. 19. 

271 



272 LIFE OF ST. FRANCIS OF ASSIST 

without any set rule or vow of obedience. Amongst those 
who were influenced by the preaching of the brethren or by 
the life itself which blossomed so fragrantly at the Porziun- 
cola and San Damiano and other places, were some who drew 
closer in spirit than others to the fraternity, and sought to 
walk more directly by the laws of its life ; shunning need 
less comfort or luxury of food and dress ; purposing to live 
chastely in body and mind, and making the poor and luckless 
the objects of their especial care. 

Thus there came into being a group of devoted followers 
of Francis and Clare who were not strictly speaking mem 
bers of the fraternity, and yet were bound to it by a sense of 
spiritual kinship. 1 Amongst the earliest of these informal 
disciples were the Lord Orlando of Chiusi, who gave Monte 
Alvernia for the use of the brethren, and the Lady Giacoma 
di Settesoli of Rome. Of Orlando we have already spoken. 2 
He remained a most attached friend of the fraternity, glad 
to consider himself its servitor whenever the opportunity 
was given him to do service either to Francis himself or the 
other brethren. 

The Lady Giacoma 3 was widow of Gratiano Frangipani, 
the noble Roman patrician whose genealogy went back to the 

1 1 cannot accept unreservedly the conclusions of M. Sabatier and P. 
Mandonnet, O.P., that in the beginning of the Franciscan fraternity these 
informal disciples who afterwards formed the nucleus of the Third Order, 
were considered members of the fraternity in the same sense as the friars and 
the sisters of San Damiano. It seems to me that P. Mandonnet seeks to 
prove too much (vide Les Origines de L Ordo de Pcenitentid), and that his 
conclusion is not consistent with the fact that Francis obtained a formal 
Rule from Innocent III in 1209 or 1210, according to which he and the 
brethren were to live. It is doubtless true that the members who professed 
this Rule had at first but the simplest organization, which, however, gradu 
ally became more definite. But there is no evidence that people professing 
this Rule separated, one group forming the First Order and another the 
Third. And that is what P. Mandonnet must prove to maintain his thesis. 

2 Vide supra, p. 159. 

3 Concerning the Lady Giacoma, vide P. Edouard d Alencon, Frere Jac 
queline ; M. Sabatier, Spec. Perfect. Etude speciale du Chapitre, 112, pp. 273-7. 
She is buried in the lower church of the basilica of San Francesco at Assisi 
near the high altar. A fresco represents her in the habit of a tertiary, and 
there is this inscription : " Hicjacet Jacoba sancta nobilisque romana." 



THE THIED OKDEB 273 

days of myth. She had sought counsel of Francis during his 
visit to Eome in 1212 ; x and from that time looked to him as 
her spiritual guide. At the death of her husband she was 
left guardian of her two infant sons and administrator of the 
family estates. Still very young, and possessed of ample 
wealth, life lay before her to choose as she would ; when in 
the first days of her widowhood, as it seems, she fell under 
the influence of Francis, and determined to devote herself to 
the education of her sons and the service of the poor and the 
worship of God. One would wish to know more of the Lady 
Giacoma than the chroniclers have told us ; for this reason 
that, excepting Clare, she was the only woman in whose 
presence Francis relaxed the strict reserve with which he 
guarded his chivalrous purity, 2 and she was one of the very 
few women to whom he ever gave a token of friendship. 
That token was a lamb which he had perhaps rescued from 
the shambles. 3 A woman of strong character was the Lady 
Giacoma, the manifest daughter of a fearless, determined 
race. 4 In characteristic fashion Francis was wont to style 
her " Brother " Giacoma. 

Now neither the Lord Orlando nor the Lady Giacoma 
could part with their feudal possessions, which were family 
and not personal estates : yet the spirit of poverty had caught 
their hearts, and this was shown not only in their greater 
charity towards the poor but in their mental attitude towards 
the property they administered and which they held in trust 

1 Wadding, Annales, ad an. 1212. This date is generally accepted by 
Francis biographers. 

2 It is generally held that Francis referred to Clare and the Lady Giacoma 
when he told a brother that he knew the faces of only two women. Cf. II 
Celano, 112. I have purposely spoken of Francis " chivalrous purity," because 
I have no doubt that in this as in aught else, he was influenced by the laws 
of romantic chivalry. 

:J Leg. Major, vm. 7, of. ibid. 6. Nearly all the early biographers mention 
St. Francis friendship with the Lady Giacoma ; vide Celano, Tract, de Mirac. 
37-9 ; Leg. Maj. ut supra ; Spec. Perfect, cap. 112 ; Bernard de Besse, Lib. 
de laudibus, cap. 8. 

4 She was of Norman blood and of one of those Norman families which 
had gained their footing in Italy with the sword. Cf. P. Edouard d Alencon, 
op. cit., p. 11. 

18 



274 LIFE OF ST. FEANCIS OF ASSISI 

from God for the common good, seeking to exercise their 
rights with justice towards others, with regard to peace with 
their neighbours and without personal avarice. 1 That was 
in fact the teaching of Francis in regard to the holding of 
property. 2 Personal goods which were wholly at one s own 
disposal he taught those who put themselves under his especial 
guidance, to distribute to the poor or to the Church, except 
what they needed for their own modest sustenance. He 
would not have them amass wealth, 3 which was the cause of 
distraction from spiritual things, and of feuds and ill-will 
with one s neighbours. We may be sure, too, that these 
followers of Francis would not be drawn into the family 
rivalries and civic contentions, against which Francis pleaded 
so vehemently. 

But if we would find the more detailed rule by which 
their lives were ordered, we shall undoubtedly discover it in the 
" Letter to all Christians," which Francis wrote in the early 
years of his apostolate. 4 This letter was not indeed written 
with the intention of making a special following for the 
fraternity, still less was it designed as a rule of life for any 
particular association. It was Francis proclamation to the 
Christian world, calling upon all people, whether clerics or 

1 In 1217 the Lady Giacorna, on behalf of herself and her sons, who were 
minors, made a deed renouncing their claims to property which had been for 
some time in dispute at law (cf. Edouard d Alencon, Frdre Jacqueline, pp. 
14-16 ; and Appendice I, pp. 37-8). P. Edouard suggests that this " act of 
peace " was due to the influence of Francis. We know that the later Rule of 
the tertiaries inculcated that they should avoid legal litigation (cf . Capestrano 
Rule, cap. x. and cap. xm. ; and the Rule of Nicholas IV, cap. xvn.) 

2 Cf . Epistola i. Opuscula, p. 87 seq. 

S 0f. Bernard de Besse (op. cit. p. 76): " Parochiali cuidam sacerdoti 
dicenti sibi quod vellet suus retenta tamen ecclesia, f rater esse, ddto vividi vi- 
vendi ct induendi modo, dicitur indixisse, lit annuatim collectis ecclesiaefructibus, 
daret pro Deo quod de praeteritis superesset ". All the early tertiaries were 
accustomed thus to distribute their superfluous goods. We can only conclude 
that it was a traditional practice derived from Francis teaching. 

4 Epist. i., in Opuscula S.P.F. (Quaracchi), p. 87; F. Paschal Robin 
son, O.F.M., Writings of St. Francis, pp. 98-108. Boehmer (Analekten, p. 49) 
publishes this letter under the title, Opusculnm Commonitorium, which is in 
deed a more illuminative title. According to Wadding (Annales, ad an. 1213) 
it was written in 1213 ; Fr. Paschal Robinson (I.e.) prefers the date 1215. 



THE THIED OEDEE 275 

laics, men or women, religious or seculars, to lead a more 
perfect Christian life, as he therein set forth. If it became 
in some sort the special charter of spiritual perfection for 
those who now gathered more closely to the fraternity, it was 
simply because these took it as the expression of Francis 
mind and made it their rule of life. 1 

The letter opens with the statement that Francis, on 
account of sickness and the weakness of his body, is unable 
to visit every one; therefore since he is "the servant of all 
and is bound to serve all and minister to them the sweet- 
smelling words of his Lord," he proposes to write this 
messenger-letter : 

"The Word of the Father, so worthy, so holy, and so 
glorious, whose coming from heaven the Most High Father 
made known by his holy Archangel Gabriel to the holy and 
glorious Virgin Mary, from her womb took true flesh of our 
humanity and frailty. And He being rich above all, willed 
nevertheless, both He and His most blessed Mother, to choose 
poverty." Having struck the keynote of his message, Francis 
then proceeds to urge the reception of the sacrament of the 
Holy Eucharist. " Since the Divine Word offered Himself on 
the cross a sacrifice for us, it is the Father s Will that all of 
us be saved through Him and that we receive Him with a 
pure heart and chaste body ". He then continues : " But few 
are they who wish to receive Him and be saved by Him, 
although His yoke is sweet and His burden light. They who 
will not taste how sweet the Lord is, and love the darkness 
more than the light ; who will not fulfil the commandments 
of God, they are accursed ; of them it is said by the prophet : 

1 On the other hand, however, Francis may have been impelled to set 
forth in writing this resume" of his teaching by the demand of the people for 
some rule of a more perfect Christian life. According to the Actus, cap. 16, 
Francis first " thought to institute the Third Order " during that evangelising 
tour he made after receiving the message from Clare and Sylvester (vide 
supra, p. 161), and he may have had this or some such thought in mind when 
he wrote the letter; though the phrase, "to institute the Third Order," repre 
sents the actual outcome of the informal following of the fraternity rather 
than the definite purpose of Francis. Francis was not then thinking of three 
Orders, but of the extension of the kingdom of God of which the friars were 
the apostles. 

18* 



276 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

They are cursed who decline from Thy commandments. But 
how happy and blessed are they who love the Lord and do 
as the Lord Himself says in the Gospel : Thou shalt love the 
Lord thy God with thy whole heart and with thy whole soul, 
and thy neighbour as thyself. Let us therefore love God and 
adore Him with a pure heart and a pure mind, because He 
Himself seeking this above all things, says : The true adorers 
shall adore the Father in spirit and in truth. For all who 
adore Him must adore Him in the spirit, of truth. And let 
us say to Him praises and prayers both day and night, saying : 
Our Father, Who art in heaven ; because we ought always 
to pray and not to faint." 

If the announcement of the coming of Jesus Christ in a 
chosen poverty, is the keynote of Francis message, this in 
sistence upon adoring God in spirit and in truth, is its charac 
teristic complement. But he then goes on to lay down the 
positive laws, so to speak, of the Christian life. " We must 
indeed confess all our sins to a priest and receive from him 
the body and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ. . . . Moreover let 
us bring forth fruits worthy of penance ; and let us love our 
neighbours as ourselves : but if anyone will not or cannot l 
love his neighbours as himself, at least let him bring upon 
them no evil but rather let him do them good. Let those 
who have received the power of judging others, exercise 
judgment with mercy, even as they themselves wish to obtain 
mercy from the Lord : for let judgment without mercy be 
done to him who doth not mercy. Let us then have charity 
and humility and let us give alms because these wash the 
soul from the foulness of sin : for men lose all that they leave 
behind in this world, but they carry with them the reward 
of charity and the alms which they gave, for which they will 
receive from the Lord a recompense and worthy remunera 
tion. We must also fast and abstain from vices and sins and 
from superfluity of food and drink ; and be Catholics. We 
must too visit churches frequently and reverence the clergy, 
not so much because of themselves if they are sinners but 
because of their ministering of the most holy body and blood 

1 The Assisi codex omits the words "or cannot". 



THE THIKD OKDEK 277 

of our Lord Jesus Christ, which they sacrifice on the altar 
and receive and administer to others. And let us all know 
for certain that no man can be saved except by the blood of 
our Lord Jesus Christ and by the holy words of the Lord 
which the clergy say and announce and administer and which 
they alone and no others must administer. But religious 
especially, who have renounced the world, are bound to do 
more and greater things but not to leave the other undone. 

" We must hold in hatred our bodies with their vices and 
sins, because our Lord says in the Gospel : All vices and sins 
go forth from the heart. We must love our enemies and do 
good to those who hate us. We must observe the precepts and 
counsels of our Lord Jesus Christ. We must also deny our 
selves and put our bodies under the yoke of servitude and 
holy obedience as each one has promised to the Lord. And 
no man shall be bound by obedience to obey any one in that 
where a sin or fault is committed. 

" But he to whom authority is entrusted and who is held 
to be the greater, let him be as the lesser and as the servant 
of the other brothers, and to each of his brothers let him 
show and have the mercy which he would wish to be shown 
to himself were he in a like case. Nor let him be angry with 
the brother because of the brother s fault, but with all patience 
and humility let him kindly teach and encourage him. 

" We must not be wise and prudent according to the flesh, 
but rather we must be simple, humble and pure. And let us 
hold our bodies in dishonour and contempt, because through 
our own fault we are all wretched and corrupt, foul and 
worms, as the Lord says by the prophet : I am a worm and 
no man, the reproach of men and the outcast of the people . 
And we must never desire to be above others, but rather we 
must be servants and subject to every human creature for 
God s sake. And all who shall do such things and persevere 
to the end, upon them the spirit of the Lord shall rest, and 
He will make in them His dwelling-place and His abode, 
and they will be children of the heavenly Father whose works 
they do, and they are the spouses, brothers and mothers of 
our Lord Jesus Christ. We are His spouses when by the 



278 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

Holy Spirit the faithful soul is wedded to Jesus Christ ; we 
are His brothers when we do the will of His Father who is 
in heaven ; we are His mothers when we bear Him in our 
heart and body by love and a pure and sincere conscience, 
and bring Him forth by holy work which ought to shine as 
an example to others. how glorious and holy and great it 
is to have a Father in heaven ! how holy, fair and lovable 
to have a spouse in heaven ! how holy and how beloved, 
pleasing and humble, peaceful and sweet and lovable and 
above all things desirable, to have such a Brother who laid 
down His life for His sheep and prayed for us to the Father, 
saying : Holy Father, keep them in Thy Name, whom Thou 
hast given Me." l 

Having thus set forth the law of the Christian life, Fran 
cis proceeds with a passionate exhortation to praise God and 
to avoid the judgment to come^ with a special reference to 
the vice of avarice : it is such an exhortation as he must 
oftentimes have given utterance to in his sermons. Finally 
he begs that all will receive this writing, and that those who 
cannot read, will have it read to them. " And all, both men 
and women, who shall receive these things kindly and under 
stand and send them to others for an example, if they per 
severe in them unto the end, may the Father and the Son 
and the Holy Ghost bless them. Amen." 2 

This letter undoubtedly puts into words the manner of 
life which Francis taught all his disciples, whether in the 
more constrained enclosure of the religious vows or in the 
broader circle of the world. It was the general formulary 
of the whole Franciscan life. In practice it would be inter 
preted by those living in the world to demand a closer or more 
distant approximation to the observances of the brethren 
themselves, according to the degree of their fervour or the 
conditions of their state. But the letter was to them in very 

1 Here follows a long quotation from our Lord s prayer, John xvn. 6-24. 
The reader will have noticed that the letter is replete with Gospel phrases, 
deftly woven into the text. 

2 This ending is characteristic. Vide Regula i ; Testamentum S. Franc. ; 
also Epistolee n. et iv., i. Opuscula, pp. G2, 82, 107, 112. 



THE THIED OEDEE 279 

fact^rule^of life to which they sought to conform -their eon- . 
duct. And thus there grew up around the fraternity .a sort 
of outer circle of Franciscan penitents who though not bound 
by the vows of the fraternity, were yet of one mind and heart 
with it in its aspiration towards the Gospel observance which 
Francis preached. In their attachment to the teaching of 
Francis they became in a marked degree separated in thought 
and conduct from the world around them. The poverty of 
the brethren was the symbol of their desire as the market 
place and fche feudal fortress were the symbols of other folk s 
ambitions/ They did not at first nor for some years con 
stitute a separate organization from the brethren themselves : 
in the larger sense they were considered members of the fra 
ternity, even as Clare and her sisters were.y 

It was probably during Francis absence in the East that 
Cardinal Ugolino definitely conceived the plan of giving these 
"secular" penitents a Eule and organization distinct from Qj>. 
that of the brethren. May be, in the troubles which followed 
upon the attempt of the Vicars to establish a more monastic ! j 
regime, some of these penitents themselves had begun to 
draw together into some sort of defensive league to assert 
their claim to be considered followers of Francis and to be 
directed by the brethren, as they did many times in the years 
that followed Francis death. 1 Or it may be that some of the 
brethren themselves had already begun to form bodies of 
penitents under their own personal authority, as John de 
Compello did with his lepers. 2 If anything of this sort did 
occur, 3 it would be further reason to the Cardinal s mind, for 

1 The " conventual " party amongst the friars were always opposed to any 
formal dependence of the Third Order on the First ; whereas the " spirituals " 
were favourable to a closer alliance. Cf. Mandonnet : Les Regies, in Opuscules 
Crit. Hist., fasc. iv. p. 181 seq. 

2 The prohibition in the Rule of 1221, chap. 12 : " Et nulld penitus mulier 
ab aliquo fratri recipiatur ad obedientiam, sed dato sibi consilio spirituali, sibi 
valuer it agat pcenitentiam," perhaps points to some such abuse; though more 
likely it was aimed at the common mediaeval custom of exacting oaths of 
obedience from one s pupils or penitents. 

3 As Ed. Lempp conjectures, vide Frerc Elie, p. 42. But John de Com- 
pello s leper-community seem to have been quite a distinct and fanatical 
attempt to form a fraternity and not a development of the Franciscan peni- 



280 LIFE OF ST. FEANCIS OF ASSISI 

carrying out his scheme at once ; but in all likelihood Ugo- 
lino had brought the idea of a vast fraternity of " lay peni 
tents," such as he had now conceived, back with him from 
his legatine journeys in Lombardy. For at this time and for 
some years past, that extensive province had been the home 
of a similar fraternity, whose Eule, approved by Pope Inno 
cent III in 1201, presented itself to the Cardinal as the basis 
of a Eule for the new fraternity he was contemplating. 

The Humiliati, as these Lombard penitents were named, 
are one of the most interesting embodiments of the pre- 
Franciscan penitential movement. 1 They were settled in 
Lombardy towards the end of the twelfth century. How they 
came into being it is impossible to tell with any certainty. 

One tradition traces their origin to some Milanese nobles 
who fled to Germany a century earlier. These nobles, taking 
to heart the lesson of adversity, had in their exile turned 
from secular politics to the consideration of their soul s 
welfare. Compelled by the loss of their property to live 
poorly and by the labour of their hands, they took to weaving 
and established amongst themselves a common life, sharing 
with each other the profits of their trade and giving gener 
ously to the poor. They met at regular times for religious 
exercises and were under the authority of a minister" 
chosen by themselves. They created in fact a religious 
communism. But they were not " religious " in the ordinary 
use of the word; they could marry and live in their own 
houses. When at length they were at liberty to return to 
Milan, they took back with them this manner of life into 
their own country. 

Whatever may be the value of this tradition, certain it is 
that when Innocent III ascended the Papal throne, the Hu 
miliati were well established throughout Milanese territory, 
and held the woollen trade largely in their hands. They had 

tent movement. He may, however, have taken the idea from some inchoate 
penitent congregation or community. 

1 Concerning the Humiliati cf. Tiraboschi, Vetera Humiliatorum Monu- 
menta ; Bolland, Ada SS. Sept. vol. vii, p. 320 seq. Jacques de Vitry speaks 
of them in his well-known letter of 1216, and in his Historia Occidentalis 
(Douia), pp. 334-7. 



THE THIKD OKDEE 281 

their meeting-places where they met both to transact business 
and for religious exercises. 1 Not all of them, however, were 
woollen-workers, but all had a trade of some sort. They 
dressed simply in a habit of grey woollen stuff. 

By the end of the twelfth century the Humiliati had thrown 
out two offshoots of a monastic character. One of these 
was an institute of men and women who added to the com 
mon observances of the fraternity, the three vows of religion ; 
the other was an institute of priests who lived in community. 2 
The Kule approved by Pope Innocent in 1201, belongs 
however to the original lay-fraternity : 3 and it was this which 
Cardinal Ugolino was to take as the basis of the Kule he 
caused to be written for the new fraternities of lay-penitents. 
The Eule of 1201 set before its adherents the imitation of 
Jesus Christ in His humility and meekness, as their leading 
purpose. Hence the Humiliati were to be patient in adver 
sity, to love God and their neighbour, even their enemy, and 
to do unto others as they would be done by. They were to 
make good any injury they might happen to inflict on any 
one. They must obey the prelates of the Church. But the 
chief interest in this Kule is in those specific regulations 
which were set down with a view to the prevalent evils of the 
time. The married members were to be faithful to the 
marriage-vow, nor were husbands and wives to separate, 
" save on account of fornication ". No member was to pos 
sess tithes " since it is in nowise lawful for lay people to hold 
tithes," and all tithes and first-fruits were to be delivered up 
to the Church. Further, out of their goods and fruits which 
remained to them after the payment of their tithes, they were 
to give alms to the poor and all superfluity of goods that 

1 These meeting-places were styled convenia or parlatoria : hence the Hu 
miliati were known also as Fratres de convenio. 

2 The organizer of the priest-community of Humiliati was St. John of 
Meda (vide Ada SS. loc. cit.). It is noteworthy that afterwards this priest- 
community came to be called the " First Order of Humiliati," though a later 
organization than the other two, in point of time. Similarly the monastic 
communities of men and women came to be known as the Second Order, 
and then the original foundation was styled the Third Order of Humiliati. 

:! Vide Epist. Innoc. in, " Incumbit vobis," of 7 June, 1201, in Tiraboschi, 
vol. n. pp. 128-34 ; Potthast, 1416. 



282 LIFE OF ST. FRANCIS OF ASSIST 

remained to them after they had made provision for their own 
frugal sustenance, were to be distributed to the poor. As to 
their clothing, they were to dress neither too finely nor squa 
lidly, since neither an affected squalor nor a too careful 
cleanliness, befit a Christian ". They were to fast at certain 
times and to observe the canonical hours of prayer, saying 
for each hour seven Paters in honour of the gifts of the Holy 
Ghost. They must provide for the sick brothers and sisters, 
and assist at the burial when any brother or sister died. 
Finally they were to assemble every Sunday in some fitting 
place " where one or several of the brethren of approved faith 
and knowledge of religion, and powerful in deed as well as in 
word, shall by licence of the diocesan bishop, set forth words 
of exhortation to those assembled to hear the word of God, 
admonishing and persuading them to live good lives and do 
works of piety : but so that they do not speak of the articles 
of the Faith and the sacraments of the Church ".* Such was 
the original Rule of the Humiliati as approved by the Holy See. 
3ut Pope Innocent almost immediately imposed yet 
another precept : the Humiliati were not to take unnecessary 
oaths. 2 Colourless as this precept might seem to us, it yet 
became one of the farthest reaching of the penitential prin 
ciples in the years to come : for it was definitely aimed at the 
feudal oath which bound a man to take the part of his feudal 
lord or the commune in any quarrel, however unjust or arbi 
trary. And in fact the refusal of the Humiliati to take the 
feudal oath soon brought them into collision with the civic 
authorities, and the persecution to which they were subjected 
caused Innocent in 1214 to address a sharp remonstrance to 
the magistrates and governors of Lombardy. 3 This obligation 

1 That is, they were " to preach penance " or give moral discourses, but not 
to expound theology. Only " preachers " properly so-called could expound 
theology. The permission given to the Humiliati was the same as that given to 
Francis when Innocent III commissioned him to preach penance ; only that 
Francis commission was more widely extended. He could preach penance 
" through the whole world " and not merely at the meetings of the brethren. 
The Franciscan tertiary Kule, as we shall see, gave to the ministers of the 
tertiaries a privilege exactly similar to that given to the Humiliati. 

2 Tiraboschi, vol. n. pp. 135-8 ; Potthast, 1415. 
:i Tiraboschi, vol. n. p. 156 ; Potthast, 4944. 



THE THIKD OEDEE 283 

imposed on the Lombard penitents was a stroke of genius : 
it became a most powerful weapon in the hands of the Church 
in dealing both with turbulent civic governments and with 
the Empire itself ; and one is not surprised that both imperial 
governors and city magistrates refused to recognize it and 
sought to penalize those who acted upon it. 1 

But the Humiliati, although sanctioned by the Church, 
were not always above suspicion with the ecclesiastical au 
thorities ; 2 some of them indeed went over to the heretics. 3 
And like all the earlier penitential movements, they were 
tainted with a gloomy puritanism. Somehow they failed to 
grasp the beauty and liberty of the Gospel : there was no 
joyous song in their religion ; 4 and for that reason they could 
never have captured the new spirit of the age with its thirst 
for life and freedom. To the end they would remain a mere 
provincial fraternity, or a religious sect. 

Oftentimes in his observant way, Cardinal Ugolino must 
have contrasted the Lombard fraternity with the Umbrian ; 
and as we have said, it was probably from Lombardy tL ,t he 
brought back to Eome the idea of a new lay-fraternity, such 
as he proposed to Francis when they met during the winter 
of 1220-1221. 5 

Unfortunately the original Eule of the Order of Penance, 
as the new fraternity was named, which the Cardinal himself 
composed in consultation with Francis 6 is at present lost, if 

1 Thus they imposed a war-tax on those who refused to take up arms at 
their bidding. Vide infra, p. 287. 

2 Cf. Epist. Honorii III, in Tiraboschi, vol. I. p. 77. 

:} Chron. Burchardi, in Mon. Germ. Hist. Script, torn. xxnj. p. 37G. 

4 Cf. Gebhardt, L ltalie Mystique, pp. 34-5. 

5 Mariano of Florence states that the Eule of the Third Order was written 
in 1220 by Francis and Ugolino whilst they were together at Florence. But 
it is proved that Ugolino was not at Florence in 1220. Cf. Arcliiv. Franc. 
Hist. an. n. fasc. I. p. 96. 

6 The decisive part taken by Card. Ugolino in the institution of the Third 
Order is not concealed in contemporary chronicles. The author of the Vita 
Gregoiii IX in Muratori, Rerum Hal. Script, torn in. p. 575, says: " Pcenit- 
entium Fratrum ct Dominarutn inclusarum twvos instituit ordines ct ad summum 
usque provexit. Minorum ctiam ordinem intra initia sub limite incerto vagan- 
tem nova regulce traditione direxit ct informavit informem" 

Ugolino, therefore, according to this author, instituted the two orders of 



284 LIFE OF ST. FRANCIS OF ASSIST 

indeed it is not altogether destroyed ; and the earliest version 
of it known to us, dates only from 1228, seven years after the 
institution of the fraternity, 1 and by that time it is probable 
some of the original precepts were modified. As it has come 
down to us, the Rule is not an inspiring document unless 
you read it in its relationship to the circumstances of the 
age and the religious fervour which made it possible. It 
is a code of legal constitutions clear-cut and calmly thought 
out, such as an ecclesiastical lawyer might deal with in 
court. It presents none of the glowing idealism of the 
early Franciscan days ; it has not even the evangelical fer 
vour which we find in Pope Innocent s Rule for the Humili- 
ati ; it is simply a Rule for external conduct. The brothers 
and sisters are bound to an austere simplicity in dress ; the 
price and texture of their garments are rigidly fixed after the 
manner of mediaeval sumptuary enactments. They must 
observe certain fasts and abstinences and recite a number of 
Paters at the canonical hours, unless they are able to read 
the psalter, when they must recite the psalms according to 
the use of the Papal Court or at least an equal number of 
psalms. They are to shun the banquets and stage-plays 
which were an immoral feature in the public life of the time ; 
to confess their sins and receive Holy Communion three times 
in the year; to make good neglected tithes and pay future 
tithes faithfully. They must not carry arms ; and except 
in certain cases approved by the Sovereign Pontiff, they 
must not take the legal oaths. They are not to have recourse 

Enclosed Ladies (Poor Glares) and of the Brethren of Penance (tertiaries) but 
only directed the organizing of the Friars Minor. The distinction between 
the two parts played by the Cardinal as institutor and director is noteworthy. 
Ugolino was not merely the adviser of Francis in the composing of the Rule 
of the Third Order, no more than in the composing of the Ugoline Constitutions 
for the Poor Ladies : he was in both cases the accredited author. Bernard 
de Besse, writing sometime later, also says that Cardinal Ugolino wrote the 
Rule of the Third Order in consulation with Francis. 

His words are : " In regulis sen vivendi formis ordinis istorum dictandis 
sacrce memories dominuspapa Gregorius in minori adhuc officio constitutus, beato 
Francisco intima familiar it ate conjimctus, devote sursplebat, quod virosancto in 
dictandi scientia deer at. " (Lib. de Laudibus, ed. Hilarin a Lucerna, p. 7G.) 

1 This is the " Capestrano " Rule, vide Appendix III, infra, p. 



THE THIRD ORDER 285 

to secular tribunals for litigation amongst themselves, and 
they are hound to make their will, if they have property, 
within three months after their profession in the fraternity. 
Before being admitted to the fraternity the novices must pay 
their debts : they must also be at peace with their neighbours. 
No one suspected of heresy might be received unless he 
had first been acquitted in the bishop s court ; and no married 
woman might be admitted except with the consent of her 
husband. Should any brother be guilty of scandal and fail 
to make reparation he must be expelled from the fraternity 
and denounced to the magistrate or governor of the place. 

Now in the political and social conditions of the early 
thirteenth century, these regulations meant a throwing down 
of the gauntlet by the Church against established conven 
tions. They struck directly at the monstrous growth of 
luxurious habits in food and dress as well as at the inordinate 
love of pleasure which drew men and women to tourney and 
pageant and public revel, to the neglect of religion and the 
serious business of life, and they were calculated to strike a 
mortal blow to the degenerate feudal conception of society 
which bound men by oath to fight for their party whether 
the cause be just or unjust. So far the Rule bears the im 
press of Cardinal Ugolino s statesmanship : it was designed 
to bring the widespread religious enthusiasm created by 
Francis, to bear upon the actual social and political abuses 
which were arming the world against the Church and the 
Gospel. One seeks in vain throughout the Rule as we now 
have it, for any expression of the more universal Franciscan 
message as Francis himself delivered it ; just as we seek in 
vain for the essential Franciscan life in the Constitutions the 
Cardinal gave to the Sisters of St. Clare. 

But as in the case of the Poor Ladies the Ugoline Con 
stitutions never represented the whole intent of their voca 
tion nor the spirit in which they lived, so was it with the 
new fraternity of penitents. Behind the Cardinal was 
Francis, and his word was the fuller Rule by which they 
ordered their lives : and to this law the Cardinal himself 
bowed in affectionate reverence if not with entire conviction. 



286 LIFE OF ST. FEANCIS OF ASSISI 

And so in the lives of the first penitents we find the same 
love of poverty and the same exuberant love of their fellow- 
men who were in sorrow or need, as make the story of the 
first friars so spiritually exhilarating. Thus it was the re 
cognized law of the fraternity whether inserted in the 
original Eule or merely an unwritten law, we cannot say 
that the penitents should distribute every year amongst the 
poor, what remained over and above their yearly income 
after their own needs were provided for. 1 Many on entering 
the fraternity at once disbursed whatever property they did 
not need for their own sustenance. They took to nursing 
the sick-poor either in the poor man s home or in hospitals. 
Thus they spent their lives in emulation of the life of the 
Porziuncola, as far as each one might. 

The new fraternity grew rapidly : throughout all Italy 
within a few years local congregations were established and 
the penitents became a social force to be reckoned with by 
the secular power. Their very dress was a challenge to the 
worldliness around them : they might not wear silk nor 
coloured garments ; their furs were simple lamb-skin ; the 
open flowing sleeve was forbidden them. 2 

They were, moreover, a religious corporation and as such 
directly subject to the ecclesiastical courts and not to the 
secular. The magistrates of the commune or the governors 
of cities and districts, had no right to enforce upon them 
public offices or burdens which contravened the letter or 
purpose of their profession. Hence they could not be forced 
legally to take up arms at the bidding of the secular power 
nor to take civic office. 

They were a body apart, just as monks and nuns were. 
And so wherever a congregation of the penitents was estab 
lished the secular authorities found themselves faced by a 
body of citizens who were legally protected by the law of the 

1 The bull " Detesntanda" of 30 March, 1228, mentions this as one of the 
matters in which the penitents were hindered by the civic authorities (cf. 
Sbaralea, Bull I. pp. 39-40). 

2 Regula Antigua, cap. i. The rule concerning dress, however, was open 
to a wide interpretation according to the rank of the person or the customs of 
the place, especially in the case of married women 



THE THIKD OEDEE 287 

Church which was co-ordinate with the law of the empire 
and the commune in their withdrawal from secular affairs. 1 
The magistrates and governors protested as they had already 
protested in the case of the Humiliati, and endeavoured to 
withstand the claims of the new fraternity. But the Church 
met their opposition not merely on legal grounds, but on 
moral grounds. The penitents were men of peace according 
to the Gospel, and might not therefore be forced to take part 
in feuds and wars which were mostly waged in opposition to 
all Christian principle and the common good of Christendom. 
They were again men who put the claims of justice and 
Christian charity before all other earthly considerations, and 
could not therefore be bound by the secular power to as 
sume public offices which were notoriously held by prac 
tices of corruption and party favour, 2 nor could they be forced 
to support the system of usury and dishonest trade with 
which industrial enterprise was generally interwoven. 3 

The commune had used its power to enmesh the indi- 

1 The first intervention of the Holy See on behalf of the new penitents 
was on 16 December, 1221, when Honorius III addressed a letter " Significa- 
tum nobis " to the Bishop of Rimini, ordering him to protect the penitents of 
Faenza and the neighbourhood against the magistrates. Cf. Sbaralea, Bull. 
i. p. 8. 

2 Humbert de Romanis, the Master-General of the Friars Preachers, says 
the penitents refused " offices to which sin attached". Cf. Sbaralea, Bull. i. 
p. 142, note e. 

3 Cf. bulls " Significatum est," ui supra: " Nimis patenter," of 25 June, 
1227 (Sbaralea, Bull. i. p. 30) " Dctestanda," of March, 1228 (ibid. pp. 39-40); 
"Nimis patenter," of 5 April, 1231 (ibid. p. 71); " Ne is qui bonis" of 15 
March, 1232 (ibid. p. 99) ; " Ut cum majori," of 21 November, 1234 (ibid. p. 
142). According to these bulls the penitents were freed from taking oaths 
except such as were necessary for the Faith, the Church and the making of 
wills ; they were not to be compelled to take part in military service ; nor to 
pay the special war-taxes imposed on those who did not bear arms ; nor to 
accept public offices, and they were not to be hindered from distributing 
their superfluous wealth to the poor. 

The penitents, however, did not always refuse to pay the war-tax when it 
was for the defence of their country. Thus Blessed Peter of Siena (died 1289) 
insisted on paying the war-tax though in view of his being a penitent, the ma 
gistrates were unwilling to accept it. " This money," he said, " belongs to 
my country when it is needed for its defence " (cf. Wadding, Annales, ad an. 
1289). 



288 LIFE OF ST. FEANCIS OF ASSISI 

vidual in all manner of unchristian practice ; the Church re 
plied by withdrawing the individual who aspired to a more 
Christian life, from the commune s jurisdiction in the matters 
which affected his Christian profession. 1 Thus there arose in 
many places a new civic struggle between the partisans of the 
established order of feud and rapine and the partisans of the 
idea of peace and neighbourly service. Of the eventual de 
velopments of the fraternity of penance and how it became the 
support of the Papacy in its struggle with the Empire, this is 
not the place to tell the story ; we are but concerned with 
its origins and its relationship with Francis. As we have seen, 
it was in part the creation of Cardinal Ugolino and as 
such belongs to the general history of the Holy See in the 
thirteenth century ; nevertheless it was a true outcome of 
the Franciscan revival of Faith and but for Francis it could 
hardly have come into being. 

The first penitent congregation was established in Flor 
ence, probably at the direct instigation of the Cardinal him 
self ; 2 and it is noteworthy as showing the spirit in which the 
fraternity was nurtured : for the Florentine penitents at once 
established a hospital in which they themselves served the 
sick poor. 3 And in fact whatever may have been the political 

1 The authority claimed by the Italian commune over the individual left 
him but little liberty of action even in the most intimate concerns of personal 
life. His private life was regulated by consular decree. His clothes, dwel 
ling-place, even the trees he might plant in his garden were thus fixed. As 
Emile Gebhardt remarks : " La cite italienne n est, en effet, une ceuvre de 
liberte et d egalite qiCen apparence. La communante y surveillc e y entrave 
I individu, car les franchises de V association republicaine ont pour garantie V abdi 
cation de toute volonte personelle " (U Italic Mystique,^. 21). The ecclesias 
tical jurisdiction of the Middle Ages was, at least in the first instance, sup 
ported by public opinion as an escape from this secular tyranny. 

2 Mariano of Florence says the Florentine congregation was established 
on 20 May, 1221. He may have had access to documents in the city archives 
which are unknown to us. Of. Bartholi, Tract, de Indulgentia, ed. Sabatier, 
Appendice, pp. 160-1 ; Compendium Chron. FF. Min. in Archiv. Franc. Hist. 
an. ii. fasc. i. p. 98. Cardinal Ugolino and Francis were in Florence in April, 
1221. Of. Rob. Davidsohn, Gescliichte von Florenz, II, Band i. pp. 125-9. 

3 Of. Wadding, Annales, ad an. 1221; Sbaralea, Bull. n. p. 293. The 
hospital stood first in the piazza of Santa Maria Novella ; it was afterwards 
transferred to the Church of San Martino, whence the Florentine penitents 
became known as the Brothers and Sisters of San Martino. 



THE THIED OEDEE 289 

and social influence of the new fraternity of penance, its chief 
glory is in that sublime spirit of loving compassion and simple 
unworldliness which runs through the story of its beginnings. 
A typical Franciscan penitent was Saint Elizabeth of Hun 
gary, who had the sick-poor removed from their squalid huts 
and conveyed to her castle on the Wartburg, where she 
nursed them herself with sisterly care; and who, when re 
leased from the cares of State, renounced the pomp and con 
ventions of Court life and went to live in a cottage, working 
with her hands as the honest poor must work for their bread. 
In after years men fondly recited the story how her husband, 
the Duke of Thuringia, found red and white roses in her 
mantle when he was searching for the bread which he knew 
she was secretly carrying to the poor. Those roses are at 
least symbolical of the sweet charity which made all her 
menial services for the poor a spring of artless joy. And that 
same sweet charity lies like a golden haze upon the stories of 
all the first Franciscan penitents. 

Thus, as an instance, take the story of the merchant 
Luchesio, whom tradition says was the first penitent received 
into the fraternity. When Francis met him in the spring 
of 1221, he was a retired merchant living in exile at Poggibonzi 
in Florentine territory, and edifying the neighbourhood by 
his charity to the poor and his love of religion. But Lu 
chesio had not always been a man of remarkable Christian 
habits. In his young days, when he was a successful merchant 
at Cagiano in the territory of Siena, he was known as a gay 
spirit with ambitions to rise in the world ; and he was not 
above paying court to the nobles and the men of influence, 
whom he would oblige with his money and delight with his 
ready wit. He married a woman of sensibility and beauty, 
who shared his ambitions and contributed not a little to his 
popularity. People named her Buona Donna the gracious 
lady : and this name befitted her through the coming vicis 
situdes which were to mark her husband s career. 

Luchesio was an ardent politician : he could hardly have 
attained to any social consideration if he had not been. Then 
with a turn of the wheel fortune went against the Guelphs 

19 



290 LIFE OF ST. FEANCIS OF ASSISI 

and in favour of the Ghibellines, and Luchesio had to flee 
for safety into the friendly Florentine town of Poggibonzi. 
Adversity and exile chastened his spirit and his thoughts 
turned to religion. Thus he was prepared to listen when 
Francis came along searching for souls. With the consent of 
the faithful Buona Donna, Luchesio now sold his property, 
all except four acres of land, and distributed the money to the 
poor. Then husband and wife received from Francis the 
colourless woollen habit of the penitents. From that time 
Luchesio worked his own small farm and lived on its produce. 
His house became a hostelry for the poor whom Francis-like 
he fed daily before he fed himself. Frequently he would take 
long journeys seeking out the sick, and finding them he would 
bring them to his house, sometimes putting them upon an 
ass, at other times bearing them on his shoulders : and 
Buona Donna received and nursed them. On occasions when 
the malaria was abroad, Luchesio would journey to stricken 
districts even as far as the sea-coast, to distribute medicines 
and food. When his own means ran short he went round 
questing from his neighbours for the wherewith to feed the 
hungry. 

Thus in incessant service for the needy and in self-denying 
love of God and their neighbour, Luchesio and his wife came 
to the life eternal. They had been true companions in life and 
they kept their companionship in death. Both fell mortally 
sick about the same time. Buona Donna prayed she might 
not out-live her husband and her prayer was heard. Luchesio 
rose from his bed to assist his wife in her last agony ; then 
he returned to bed and died also : "in death they were not 
divided " * 

1 Cf. Acta SS. Aprilis, torn. in. pp. 594 seq. ; Chron. xxiv. Gen. in Anal. 
Franc, in. p. 27 ; Wadding, Annales, ad ann. 1213 and 1221. 



CHAPTEE VII. 
THE FRIARS ESTABLISH A SCHOOL. 

AND now, reader, I must ask you to give your attention to 
that question of schools for the friars, which brought sorrow 
into the life of Francis in his latter years and which has ever 
since been a source of controversy amongst those who speak 
of him. 

Some there are who would have us believe that Francis 
was altogether antagonistic to learning and that, if he had 
had his way, he would have banned the teaching of the 
schools from his fraternity for all time. And, indeed, it is 
easy to find words of his which, taken apart from the circum 
stances in which they were uttered and from the context of 
his life, might well seem to favour this judgment of him. 
But of no man were it more misleading so to quote his words. 
Francis, be it remembered, was no philosopher given to utter 
ing abstract or universal propositions. He was at all times a 
man of action dealing directly with the concrete case before 
him. And as it happens, most of Francis sayings concern 
ing book-learning were uttered in the stress of a struggle for 
the maintenance of the very life of the fraternity as he had 
founded it : in which struggle the question of scholastic 
studies was chiefly advocated by those who lacked sympathy 
with the original purpose of the fraternity and looked for in 
spiration to the outer world. Had they achieved their 
purpose, the fraternity would have been totally transformed 
from that which it was designed to be, into something 
utterly foreign to its own character and vocation. Francis, 
therefore, was in the position of a man who feels himself 
bound to guard what has been entrusted to him against 

291 19 * 



292 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSISI 

those who would snatch it from his keeping in order to 
pervert it to some traitorous use. 

In such circumstances friendly argument with the enemy 
at the gate will seem a dangerous approach to disloyalty. 
With the demand of some of the brethren that they should 
be allowed to make book-studies and attend schools, went 
the contention, either openly confessed or implicit, that the 
fundamental ideal of poverty must be reconsidered and 
brought into closer relationship with what the dissident 
brethren considered the greater usefulness of the fraternity ; 
and so when the question of studies was brought up, it was 
complicated by its connexion with a policy of secular pru 
dence which to the soul of Francis meant a betrayal of the 
life of Poverty. 

To state the truth of the matter at once, Francis did not 
anathematize academic study and book-learning as an evil in 
itself, but he valued as a supreme treasure of his vocation 
that heart-knowledge which is gained in the battle of life 
when men are wholly intent upon the achievement of the 
cause to which they are consecrated. Any learning other than 
this was to him a mere mental luxury and a distraction from 
the real business of life, and tended to self-conceit more than 
to the service of God. 

Now he was convinced that the demand for books and 
/ schools which had arisen amongst the brethren had no re 
lationship with the vocation to which they were dedicated 
but to purposes apart : and in great measure this was but too 
true. Had it been otherwise the bitter controversies which 
now arose, would never have arisen : for Francis, far from 
being indifferent to mental culture, had a native feeling for 
it. He gave peculiar reverence to men whose judgments were 
weighted with solid learning, and especially to theologians of 
the right sort who spoke of religion with understanding and 
wisdom : these he declared were lords amongst men and de 
serving of homage. 1 It is to be noted, that he was accustomed 

1 Of. Testamentum 8. Franc. : " Et omnes tlieologos et qui ministrant verba 
divina debemus honorare et venerari sicut qui ministrant nobis spiritum et 
vitam ". 



THE FKIAKS ESTABLISH A SCHOOL 293 

to fill the more responsible offices in the fraternity with learned 
brethren. Thus he appointed Peter Cathanii, a doctor of 
law, to be his first Vicar-General ; he sent Pacifico, the poet- 
laureate, as minister to France ; the two Vicars set to govern 
the fraternity during his absence in the East were both men 
of parts intellectually ; Brother Elias, as we know, had ac 
quired some reputation in the schools of Bologna. Nor was 
he himself without mental culture. He had been greatly in 
fluenced by the new romantic literature of his time and 
made use of the romances of chivalry in his instruction of 
the brethren. He emulated too the minstrels of Provence. 
At one time he had felt the attraction to more exact studies. 1 
Nor is this incident without significance : for once when some 
brethren were anxious to study the Scriptures and there was 
only one volume at hand, Francis took and divided the leaves 
and distributed to each brother a portion, that the brothers 
might not have to wait till the whole volume could be passed 
round in turn. 2 

But where Francis fell foul of many of the schoolmen 
who had entered the fraternity, was in his plain disregard for 
what we now call the theory of "learning for learning s 
sake ". He held that knowledge is to be valued only in rela 
tion to character and action. He would say: "As much 
knowledge has a man, as he does deeds; and a religious 
prays well only inasmuch as he works well : for the doer is 
known by his fruits ". 3 And again he would say that " they 
who rely upon book-learning in the day of sorrow and battle, 
will find their hands empty"; 4 since it is not learning but 
the fulfilment of one s duty which makes a man spiritually 
strong. 

Moreover he held as of little account that preaching which 
is based on book-knowledge rather than on spiritual experi 
ence. His brethren, he would say, were not called by God to 
be orators to tickle the fancy of the audience with elegance 

1 Cf. Spec. Perfect, cap. 4 : " Ego similiter tentatus fui habere Zi&ros," etc. 

2 S. Bonaventure, Epist. de Tribus Qucestionibus, no. 10, in Opera Omnia 
(Quaracchi), vol. vm. p. 334 b. 

8 Spec. Perfect, cap. 4. *ibid. cap. 70. 



294 LIFE OF ST. FEANCIS OF ASSISI 

of language and fine conceits, but to be preachers of the 
Divine Word. They were to speak God s message. This 
message they would learn more truly in prayer and in ponder 
ing in the heart upon Divine Truth, than in books. He would 
say : " The preacher should first draw in by secret prayer what 
he is afterwards to pour out in sacred discourse ; he must rather 
grow hot within than utter cold words outwardly ". 

It was not by fine words that the people would be con 
verted but by the glowing spirit : nor could he repress his 
scorn for those brethren who took credit to themselves when 
they had delivered some elaborately prepared oration and 
gained the people s applause. " Why do you boast of people 
converted," he would exclaim, when it is my simple 
brethren who have converted them by their prayers?" 1 

His indignation with these vain scholars arose partly 
from his great reverence for life itself. Life with its 
emotions and duties, was too sacred to be their plaything. 
Knowledge begotten of life filled him with a sense of awe : 
it meant to him a coming into the very presence of God, the 
source of all Truth. As showing his singular reverence for 
this higher knowledge we must note that he held in great 
respect all spoken and written words, since they symbolized 
to him this divine self-revelation : which respect was shown 
in naive fashion. He would never obliterate a word he had 
written, however unnecessary it might be to the sense of his 
writing ; and he was accustomed to gather up any scraps of 
writing he found on the road and put them aside in reverence. 

Once when it was pointed out to him, perhaps not 
without sarcastic intention, that the scrap of writing he had 
rescued was from some heathen author, he replied that it 
mattered not, since the words, whether of heathens or of 
other men, all came from the wisdom of God. 2 

This intense reverence for the written word showed itself 
also in his method of reading : for whenever he came upon a 
passage which stimulated his thought, he would read no 
further, but closed the book and pondered upon what he had 
read that he might not lose aught of a good thing. And that 

1 II Celano, 163-4. 2 1 Celano, 82. 



THE FKIARS ESTABLISH A SCHOOL 295 

was how he would have the brethren read. One good book 
read thus, he said, was better than a thousand treatises 
hurriedly skimmed over. 1 

Thus Francis, as you see, was no contemner of reading ; 
but he would have the brethren study only what would 
strengthen and inflame the heart with the knowledge proper 
to their vocation. And he would have them think more with 
the heart than with the brain. For life for the Friar Minor, 
meant above all else the love of Jesus Christ and of the 
world for Christ s sake. Hence he would have it that the 
one desirable object of study was Jesus Christ the Lord of 
the fraternity. Yet this saying must not be understood in 
any narrow sense. Did not the tales of Roland and the Pala 
dins stimulate Francis in the service of His Divine Master ? 
Whatever touched his heart with a generous impulse spoke 
to him of his Lord s life and service, and he took tribute in 
the way of knowledge from all the good and noble things he 
found upon the earth whether in the deeds of men or in the 
existence of other creatures. He found, 

" tongues in trees, books in the running brooks, 
"Sermons in stones, and good in everything." 

All told him of the life he thirsted for. Perhaps this very 
receptivity of his being to the voices of Nature itself, made 
him feel less the need of books than do men of duller intui 
tions and slower hearts ; and for this reason perhaps he failed 
to appreciate the need which most men have of seeking an 
interpretation of their own experience in the writings of 
others. But though this may have had some influence upon 
his attitude towards the accumulation of books by the brethren, 
it was not the ground of his opposition. His real opposition 
came from his instinctive perception that in their book-learn 
ing, many of the brethren were losing their simplicity of heart 
and the pure ideal of their calling : they were setting aside 
that heart-knowledge which is gained by spiritual experience 
and the fulfilment of one s proper purpose, for the sake of a 
mere intellectual satisfaction : and that meant ruin to the 

1 II Celano, 102. 



296 LIFE OF ST. FRANCIS OF ASSISI 

character of the fraternity. Such purely intellectual know 
ledge, or knowledge trained upon mere secular purposes, was 
what men mostly acquired in the schools, and for this reason 
he would say that when a learned man entered the fraternity, 
if he wished to be a true Friar Minor, he must in some sort 
leave behind him the learning he had gained in the world. 
He once expressed his mind concerning the reception of school 
men, in this fashion : "I would have a man of letters come 
to me with this petition : See, brother, I have lived long in 
the world and have never truly known my God. Give me, I 
beseech you, a place removed from the turmoil of the world 
where I may grieve over my past years, and where, gathering 
together the scattered energies of my heart, I may reform my 
soul for better things. And he added : " What think you 
would the man become who made such a beginning ? Verily 
he would go forth to all things with the strength of a lion 
unchained. Such a man might at length be confidently as 
signed to the true ministry of the Word, because he would 
pour forth that which was boiling within him." 1 That 
parable strikes the keynote of Francis opposition to aca 
demic studies. In the schools men " did not truly know their 
God ". 

But the brethren who were clamouring to be allowed to 
study, saw only in Francis attitude a stern unreasoning op 
position to learning. And Francis had not the gift of making 
a logical analysis of a situation and of unravelling the tangled 
threads of a complexity. Perhaps if he had, the others would 
not have understood : they too were encumbered by a mental 
horizon beyond which they could not see. 

They saw what others, not of the fraternity, were doing, 
and felt what they might do if they were as other men. The 
Friars Preachers, for example, were studying theology and 
opening schools and becoming a power in the Church ; and 
why not they ? Very subtly the sense of power was moulding 
their thoughts : they were conscious of the power latent in 
the fraternity, as a new-born virile nation exults in its energy ; 
and they were keen for conquest. It was an intoxication of 

1 II Celano, 194. 



THE FKIAKS ESTABLISH A SCHOOL 297 

the mind and they would gladly use the world s weapons to 
subdue the world. And then, many of them felt that fascina 
tion for study which was beginning to draw men in their thou 
sands to the great centres of learning, such as Bologna and 
Salerno. 1 The fraternity, recruited widely from all classes 
and conditions, could hardly escape that new enthusiasm for 
learning which was sweeping over Christendom. 

And a wonderful thing it seemed, that gift of knowledge. 
True, the schools were as yet in that early stage in which 
memory and fancy are cultivated almost to the exclusion of 
the deeper reflective faculty, and when the forms of knowledge 
and the art of expression are of more immediate concern than 
knowledge itself. Yet even so they seemed to open out an 
infinitude of mental liberty and to transform a man as by 
magic from the condition of a clod of earth into something 
more ethereal. There was an intoxication in the conceit, 
which those will forgive who remember in their own case the 
fascination of that youthful exercise of the intellect and the 
first sadness that comes of the awakening to a deeper reality. 
Most of the brethren who came from the schools, now that 
the fraternity was becoming a power with the people, had 
passed through no deep spiritual experience which would 
have sobered their minds and brought grace to their know 
ledge : they had but succumbed to the general enthusiasm 
which Francis evoked. The learning of the schools was still 
an idol of their desire. 

Thus between them and Francis there was a gulf of mis 
understanding. Each spoke of learning and the study of 
books with his heart turned towards a goal different from 
that which attracted the other. And that was what Francis 
felt. The anxiety for books and schools was a symptom of 
a spirit turning away from the truth which he had taught 
them and looking towards the outer world in which poverty 
had no part. " Wheedled by the evil spirits, these brethren 
of mine will depart from the way of holy simplicity and 
most high poverty," he cried out. " They will receive monies 

1 Bologna, it is said, at this time numbered ten thousand students. Of. 
Denifle, Die Universittiten des Mittelalters, i. pp. 135-6. 



298 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSISI 

and bequests and legacies of all kinds ; they will leave poor 
and solitary places and build sumptuous houses for themselves 
in boroughs and cities, which will proclaim to men not the 
condition of the poor but the pomp of princes and lords of 
the world ; with much cunning and human prudence and im 
portunity they will seek and procure privileges from the 
Church and the Sovereign Pontiffs, not only relaxing but 
destroying the purity of the Eule they have promised to 
observe and of the life revealed to them by Christ." l 

The difficulty became acute over the convent which Peter 
Stacia had built at Bologna during Francis absence in the 
Bast. That convent was to Francis a symbol of the evil 
which the unholy desire for learning would work amongst 
the brethren, leading them to set at naught the poverty and 
simplicity proper to their vocation. Whether Peter Stacia 
had meant to establish a school of theology after the example 
of the Dominicans, or whether he intended the brethren at 
Bologna to follow the ordinary curriculum of law and arts in 
the university, we cannot say. In either case he had acted 
openly in defiance of Francis and with manifest disregard for 
the original spirit of the fraternity. In uttering his malediction 
upon the head of Peter Stacia, Francis had cursed the secular 
ambition which was invading the Order. That curse struck 
terror into the hearts of many ; the more so because Francis 
to the end of his life could never be induced to recall it. 
Nevertheless the restless anxiety for study was not stilled. 
It was deliberately encouraged by Brother Elias, who even 
permitted the lay -brethren to have books for study. And this 
seemed to Francis the greater evil; for from the time the 
troubles began, he had begun to fasten his faith upon the lay- 
brethren as the upholders of the simplicity of the fraternity. 2 

1 Legenda Vetus, no. 1, in Opuscules de Critique Historique, torn. i. fasc. 
in. pp. 87-8. The passage undoubtedly expresses the actual fears of Francis, 
though perhaps in the language of the writer of the legend. Compare with it 
II Celano, 69, 157. 

2 Of. Spec. Perfect, cap. 72 ; Eccleston [ed. Little], col. xm. p. 88. Elias 
pursued a policy of favouring the lay-brothers and attaching them to his 
person. They became his chief supporters later on. Cf. Salimbene, loc. cit. 
pp. 99-100. 



THE FKIAKS ESTABLISH A SCHOOL 299 

With mingled indignation and sorrow he therefore one day 
listened to a lay-brother novice who came to him to ask 
leave to have a psalter. The Vicar-General had already given 
him the desired permission, but knowing Francis mind re 
garding this matter, the novice was uneasy, and yet he 
dearly wanted the psalter to read and study. " Father," he 
said, " it would be a great comfort to me to have a psalter, 
and the General has allowed it unto me ; nevertheless I would 
fain have it with your knowledge and approval." But Francis 
met the request with an outburst of pent-up sorrow : " Charles 
the Emperor, Eoland and Oliver and all the paladins and 
puissant men who were mighty in war, pursuing the heathen 
with sore sweat and labour even to the death, achieved a vic 
tory worthy of remembrance and at last themselves died in 
battle martyrs for the faith of Christ ; but now there are 
many who only for the telling of the deeds they did, would 
have honour and human praise. Likewise amongst ourselves 
there are many who only by reciting and preaching the works 
which the saints have done, wish to receive honour and praise." 
The novice went away but returned after some days with the 
same request. Francis was sitting by the fire. When the 
novice had recited his petition, Francis replied somewhat 
caustically : " and when you have got the psalter you will 
covet and desire a breviary. And when you have got a bre 
viary you will sit in a high chair like a great prelate and call 
to your brother : bring me my breviary V Then he took a 
handful of ashes and in dramatic mockery made as though to 
wash his head with the ashes, murmuring meanwhile aloud : 
" Me, a breviary ! Me, a breviary ! " The novice shamefacedly 
looked on. But afterwards Francis took him more gently 
and persuasively : " Brother," he said, " I too have likewise 
been tempted to have books, but whilst I was still ignorant of 
God s will concerning this matter I took a book wherein were 
written the Gospels of the Lord, and I prayed that in the 
first opening of the book He would show me His Will ; and 
having finished my prayer, in the first opening of the book 
this word of the Gospel came to me : To you it is given to 
know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to others 



300 LIFE OF ST. FEANCIS OF ASSIST 

in parables ." Then after awhile he added meditatively : " So 
many there are who are ready to exalt themselves unto know 
ledge, that he will be blessed who makes himself barren for 
the love of the Lord God ". Not for some months did the 
novice again seek to have the psalter, but at last the tempta 
tion once more grew strong ; and again he applied to Francis 
one day when he was standing near his cell at the Porziuncola. 
Francis answered tersely : " Go ; act in this matter as your 
minister has told you ". The novice, however, had not gone 
many steps when Francis ran after him and bade him come 
back to the spot where he had spoken. Then he knelt at the 
novice s feet and confessed that he had spoken wrongly against 
the Eule : " Brother, I have done wrong," he said, " for who 
soever would be a true Friar Minor, must have nothing save 
only, as the Eule allows, a tunic and cord and breeches and, 
those who need them, shoes ". So ended that incident to the 
novice s discomfiture. 1 

Matters stood thus between Francis and the brethren, 
when in 1221 or 1222 the precise date cannot be fixed 
the house of studies at Bologna was reopened, as we have 
said, through the intervention of Cardinal Ugolino, 2 who 
on the occasion of a visit to Bologna, made a public declara 
tion that the house did not belong to the Friars Minor but 
to the Holy See, and that the brethren had but the simple 
use of it. The declaration was designed to meet Francis 
scruples on the point of poverty. It may be doubted whether 
he was altogether consenting to this arrangement ; but the 
essential principle of non-ownership being conceded, he made 
no further opposition to the friars returning there. 

The Cardinal had undoubtedly come to the conclusion 
that it was in the interest of the Church that the Friars 
Minor should study theology and have theological schools. 
There were several reasons for such a step. Men of heroic 

1 Spec. Perfect, cap. 4 ; II Celano, 195. 

2 Ugolino was at Bologna in July, August, and October of 1221. Cf . Guido 
Levi, Registri, pp. 24, 38, 108, 121. He was still in Northern Italy in the 
beginning of 1222, and may have visited Bologna that year also, although 
there is no record of such a visit. Cf. supra, p. 266. 



THE FKIAKS ESTABLISH A SCHOOL 301 

sanctity and high spiritual enlightenment, such as Francis 
and some others in the fraternity, might perhaps do well 
as preachers without scholastic training ; but not all the 
brethren, nor by far the greater part, were of such ex 
ceptional spirituality. And in any case, even if they had 
been, circumstances now were different. In the beginning 
and until lately, the preaching of the brethren had been 
confined to the preaching "of penance," that is, of right 
Christian conduct : they had not been called upon to expound 
the dogmas of faith. But in view of the spread of heresy 
the Cardinal meant to extend the scope of the friars preach 
ing so as to instruct the people in the Faith and combat the 
heretics. But for this, theological training would be neces 
sary. Already the Church was suffering from itinerant 
preachers who, in sheer ignorance of Catholic theology, 
preached heresy. 1 

But the Cardinal had a yet further purpose. One of the 
crying needs of the day was for theological schools for the train 
ing of the clergy. In the universities theology was either ex 
cluded from the course of studies or it was expounded on purely 
speculative principles which led to all manner of heresies. The 
Aristotelean philosophy seemed to be regarded as of higher au 
thority than the Fathers of the Church in the interpreting of 
Holy Scripture. 2 Even in the monastic schools the studies 
were mostly concerned with law and medicine to the neglect of 
Scripture and theology. 3 The Holy See had endeavoured to 
remedy the evil by ordaining the establishment of Church 
schools ; but the ordinance had remained largely a dead 
letter owing to the lack of competent masters. 4 The Do 
minicans had from the beginning taken the matter in hand 
with immediate success, and Cardinal Ugolino looked to the 

1 Vide e.g. the Constitution of Odo, Bishop of Paris, concerning ignorant 
preachers. Harduin, Ada Condi, vi. p. 1945, no. 41. 

2 The doctrines of Amaury de Bena and David de Dinant had been but 
recently solemnly condemned, and in consequence the reading of Aristotle, 
whether in public or private, was forbidden (cf. Denifle-Chatelain, Chartul. 
Universit. Paris, i. no. 11, p. 70 ; no. 12, p. 71 ; no. 22, p. 81). 

3 Cf. Denifle-Chatelain, loc. cit. no. 32, p. 90. 
4 Cf. Denifle, Die Universitaten, i. p. 708A. 



302 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSISI 

Friars Minor to do the same. The reopening of the house 
at Bologna was preliminary to inducing Francis to consent 
to the opening of a theological school for the brethren. 

From the summer of 1222 and throughout the following 
year it is evident that Francis had Bologna much in mind. 
On the feast of the Assumption, 1222, he was in the city and 
preached one of his unforgettable sermons in the great piazza 
before a vast crowd of citizens and students; and to the 
students it seemed a wonderful thing that a man unversed in 
the arts of the schools, should plunge so easily into the mys 
teries of religion and carry his audience along untrodden 
paths of thought as one at home there. Many of the students 
saw him for the first time, and they looked upon a small 
emaciated man in a patched unkempt garment, whose out 
ward appearance was in strange contrast to his warm graceful 
eloquence as he discoursed to them on the duties and respon 
sibilities of men who share with angels and devils the gift of 
reason. 1 Again, a little before Christmas, the city was 
startled by a letter which Francis had written to the brethren 
and which he ordered them to read in all the schools of the 
city. In it he foretold the great earthquake which shook all 
Lombardy on Christmas Day and for many days afterwards, 
and was remembered with terror in the years to come. 2 Yet 
again he was at Bologna in the following April, when he 
preached to the people and predicted another earthquake 
which happened on the Good Friday. 3 

1 Thomas of Spalatro, at the time a student at Bologna, has left a vivid 
pen-picture of Francis appearance on this occasion. Of. Historia Pontificwn 
Salanitanorum et Spalatinorum, edited by Heinemann in Hon. Germ. Hist. 
Script, xxix. p. 580. Sigonius (De Episcopus Bonon. Opera Omnia, in. col. 
432) took liberties with the text of Thomas of Spalatro and added the date 
1220 : and this date was accepted by later writers. But Heinemann, makes it 
clear that this sermon was preached in the same year as the great earthquake at 
Brescia, which occurred on 25 December, 1222. Computing the year by the 
most common method, from 25 March, this places the sermon on 15 August, 
1222 ; and this is the date now generally accepted. Of. Golubovich, op. cit. 
p. 98 ; Boehmer, Analekten, p. 106. 

2 Eccleston [ed. Little], col. vi. p. 40. Cf. Muratori, Annali d Italia, 
ad an. 1222. 

3 Cf . Fr. Barthol. della Pugliola, Chron. di Bologna, in Muratori, Rerum 
Ital. Script, xviu. col. 254. 



THE FKIAKS ESTABLISH A SCHOOL 303 

It is not unlikely that these visits to Bologna had some 
reference to the establishment of a theological school such as 
Cardinal Ugolino desired. At any rate the predestined man 
had now appeared in this very province of the Romagna, who 
was to bring this difficult question to some sort of solution. 
He was Brother Anthony, afterwards to be known as Saint 
Anthony of Padua. 1 

Anthony s appearance in history is somewhat in the 
nature of a romance, as is frequently the case with men of 
magnetic personality. He had become a Friar Minor, as we 
have seen, at the shrine of the martyred friars of Morocco in 
the church of the Canons Eegular at Coimbra. His one desire 
then was to preach the Faith to the infidels and perhaps be 
martyred in the cause. But shipwreck and sickness brought 
him to Italy just before the time of the General Chapter of 
1221 and he had found his way to the Chapter in the com 
pany of other friars. But when the brethren were dispersing 
to their provinces Anthony, an unknown friar and of a retir 
ing disposition, was nearly being passed over when Gratiano, 
the Minister-Provincial of Lombardy, invited him to join that 
province. As a priest he would be useful, Gratiano thought, 
to say Mass for the brethren in some solitary hermitage. So 
Anthony was sent to San Paolo in the mountains near Forli 
in the Romagna. There he gave himself to solitary prayer 
and to menial services amongst the brethren. No one sus 
pected his wide rea ding of theology or his talent for 
preaching. 

Gratiano and the friars in fact thought him a simple man 
with just enough knowledge of Latin to enable him to say 

1 Concerning -Anthony of Padua, cf. Vita Primitiva, ed. Hilaire de Paris; 
also another version of the same legend in Portugallice Mon. Hist. Script, vol. 
i. ; yet another version edited by Josa, Legenda sen Vita et miracula sancti An- 
tonii (Bologna, 1883). Cf. Rigaldi, Vita B. Antonii, ed. by d Auraules ; Chron. 
xxiv. Gen. in Anal. Franc. III. p. 121 seq. ; Kerval, S. Ant. de Padua, Vita 
duce. 

For a critical examination of these early sources cf . Lepitre, Saint Antoine 
de Padoue (Paris, 1901) ; Holland, Acta SS. Junii, die 13 ; P. Niccolo dal-Gal, 
S. Antonio di Padova (Quaracchi, 1907); Hilarin de Lucerne, Histoire 
des Etudes, p. 139 seq. 



304 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSISI 

Mass. But some months afterwards there was an ordination 
of priests at Forli and the brethren of San Paolo were bidden 
to be present. The brethren were all assembled in the house 
of the Order at Forli for their evening meal, with some 
Dominican friars as their guests ; and after the collation the 
Guardian asked one of the Dominicans to address the com 
munity upon divine things. But not one of the guests would 
consent. Thereupon Anthony was ordered to speak in simple 
words as God should inspire him. He too excused himself, 
but the Guardian insisted. Then upon obedience he rose up 
and spoke and to their amazement the assembled brethren 
discovered they had harboured a genius in the guise of a 
simpleton. 

Anthony was now torn, much against his will, from the 
retreat of San Paolo, and within a short while the people of 
the Romagna were awake to the new preacher who had risen 
suddenly amongst them. 

There was that about Anthony which made his preaching 
distinctive. He had all the moral fervour of a penitential 
preacher ; but to the heart aflame he added a clear argumen 
tative intellect and a memory well stocked with the lore of 
Scripture and the Fathers of the Church. That was indeed 
what those people in the Romagna needed in the way of 
preaching. Nowhere had the heretics gained ground more 
surely than in that province, and religion had taken an argu 
mentative turn because of them. 

The Cathari, who denied the authority of the Church and 
the validity of the sacraments and who held to the creed that 
the creation was in part of evil origin, were to be found every 
where, making adherents and bringing doubt into the minds 
of the people. For their authority they appealed to the Scrip 
tures, the texts of which they expounded by that subjective 
method which was in vogue both amongst orthodox and un 
orthodox and which allows its disciples a free play of opinion 
or fancy in the interpretation : and so the Cathari were able 
to read their own tenets into any Scripture passage they chose, 
and to pass off their own tenets as the inspired word of Holy 
Writ. In fact they claimed to read anew the Scriptures in 



THE|FBIAKS ESTABLISH A SCHOOL 305 

the light of enlightened reason. 1 Anthony, on the other 
hand, had mastered the Scriptures in the light of the Catholic 
instinct and patristic teaching. As he arrayed his texts they 
shone with the accumulated wisdom of the saintly Catholic 
teachers of the past : but the wisdom had become his own 
in his long meditative vigils and rapt spiritual experience. 
And so as he poured out the traditional teaching of those 
who had gone before him, it palpitated with the living con 
viction of his own heart. Strangely enough, seeing that he 
was regarded as "the hammer of heretics," his sermons 
were not of a controversial character : they might have been 
preached before a community of orthodox monks as appro 
priately as before a crowd in the cathedral or market-place. 2 
As we have them in writing, they are discourses on the spiri 
tual life rather than expositions of Catholic teaching meant to 
combat heretical views. 

He was indeed of the race of the mystics and not of the 
dialecticians. His argument was fashioned not to display a 
logical consistency or inconsistency, but to convey some felt 
truth of the inner life, or some experience of faith. And after 
all, whether for the confuting of unbelievers or the confirm 
ing of believers, it is this manner of argument which sways 
the world. 

Such was the friar whose eloquence had set the Eomagna 
astir. Already at this time when Francis was preaching at 
Bologna, people were telling the story how at Kimini, where 
Cathari and Ghibellines had long made mockery of the 
Church and would not listen to the new preacher, Anthony 
had bidden them follow him to the sea-shore ; and how when 
they came there, he had called to the fishes to hear the word 
of God; and how at his call the surface of the sea moved 

1 Of. Felice Tocco, U Eresia nel Media Evo, pp. 128-9 : " I perfetti cathari 
parevano animati da una fede pih razionale et pi-ii studiosi dei sacri testi ". 
One finds a similar instance of this style of interpretation amongst the Chris 
tian Scientists of to-day. 

2 Vide Opera Omnia S. Antonii, ed. de la Haye (Parisiis, 1641), mostly a 
collection of sermons. Doubtless as they are written we have but the schema 
of his sermons ; and in the actual delivery he may have made local applica 
tions which are not embodied in the text. 

20 



306 LIFE OF ST. FRANCIS OF ASSIST 

with the fish who rose up to listen whilst he preached. 1 But 
Anthony s miracles and he was a singular wonder-worker 
were but another form of his preaching, that is, an argu 
ment of the faith which was in him. Francis must have 
heard of the doings of this newly-known disciple who to the 
brethren seemed himself the greatest of his miracles ; for 
never, they thought, had there been such a combination of 
learning and simple faith, of the majestic power of eloquence 
with such utter self-effacement. 

Here then was the theologian after Francis own heart. 
Later on when Anthony was appointed to teach theology, 
Francis addressed a letter to him beginning: "Brother 
Anthony, my bishop : " it was a compliment which came 
from the heart and from i the glad reverence with which he 
welcomed him. 

Anthony s appointment as lector of theology at Bologna 
was made probably during the winter of 1223. Francis then 
wrote to him : "It pleases me that you should read sacred 
theology to the brethren so long as on account of this study 
they do not extinguish the spirit of holy prayer as is 
ordained in the Rule". 2 

In after years there was a persistent tradition that before 
taking up the lectorship at Bologna, Anthony went to 
Vercelli the better to fit himself by study for the task 
imposed upon him. That city was the seat of a new theo 
logical school recently established in the abbey of San 
Andrea. Thomas G-allo, who presided over the abbey school, 
was, as all the world knows, a man of high repute amongst 

1 Rigaldas (op. cit. p. 89) says this miracle occurred near Padua ; but see 
Lepitre, cap. 4, Engl. transl. p. 62 seq. 

2 Of. Chron. xxiv. Gen. in Anal. Franc, in. p. 132; II Celano, 163. The 
exact reading of this letter has been a matter of doubt ; hence the Quaracchi 
editors put it amongst the doubtful writings of St. Francis in their edition of 
the Opuscula (p. 179) ; so also does Boehmer, Analekten, p. 71 : but both 
regard the substance as authentic. The discovery of a copy of the letter in 
MS. de Leignitz seems, however, to put the authentic^ beyond doubt. Cf. 
Opuscules de Critique Hist. torn. i. p. 76. The reference in the letter to the 
Rule proves that it was written after the promulgation of the Rule of 1223, as 
the words : " Sanctce orationis spiritum non extinguant " are a quotation from 
the fifth chapter of that Rule. 



THE FKIAKS ESTABLISH A SCHOOL 307 

the learned theologians of his day. He was a disciple of the 
theological school of St. Victor in Paris, and himself the 
author of an exposition of the writings attributed to Denis 
the Areopagite. Whether Anthony, however, actually studied 
at Vercelli is doubtful ; but this is certain, that he knew the 
master of the school and was on terms of friendship with 
him: for Gallo himself has written: "Many have pene 
trated into the secrets of the most holy Trinity, as I myself 
know by experience of Anthony of the Order of Minors in 
the friendly intercourse I had with him. He was but little 
versed in secular arts yet in a short while he became so con 
versant with mystical theology that aflame inwardly with 
heavenly love he outwardly shone with sacred knowledge." l 
No other testimony is needed to explain why Francis con 
sented to Anthony teaching theology. If theology had to be 
taught, Anthony was the predestined teacher after Francis 
own heart. 

And no mere accident was it that drew Anthony into 
friendship with Thomas Gallo, but rather an affinity of spirit. 
The Victorine school of theology was mystical rather than 
dialectical. Though it did not ignore the speculative the 
ology then coming into vogue, yet it subordinated this 
new method of thought to the positive teaching of the 
Fathers of the Church, and sought for the vision of truth 
rather than for its analysis. 2 

The mystic of all ages has held that life itself cannot 
be adequately measured by the mere logical faculty of the 
mind but only by the intuition of the whole personality when 
attuned to the truth by moral as well as mental discipline. 
With the purely dialectical school of theology the pure 
Franciscan spirit could never have come to terms : too wide 
a "gulf separated this school of cold reasoning from the heart- 
governed temperament of the true sons of Poverty. In 

1 E. Salvagnini, S. Antonio di Padova e i suoi tempi (Torino, 1887), p. 93. 
The author discovered this passage in an unedited manuscript of Gallo in the 
Turin Library. Another version is given in MS. de Leignitz, loc. cit. p. 76 ; 
Glassberger, Anal. Franc, n. p. 34 ; Chron. xxiv. Gen. in Anal. Franc, in. 
p. 131. 

2 Cf. Hugon. de S. Viet, in Migne, Bibliotheca, torn. CLXXV.-CLXXVII. 

20* 



308 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSIST 

purely academic learning the soul of the Franciscan must 
ever be a stranger ; its affinity is with the realities of life in 
which the whole spirit of man and not merely the intellect, 
grows and gains its liberty. 

Much the same spirit urged the disciples of the school of 
St. Victor in their intellectual life. They sought for know 
ledge by the exercise of all the spiritual faculties : not only 
must a man read ; he must work and pray. And out of the 
experience of life, knowledge would come, and the highest 
knowledge might be gained only in the highest experience, 
namely, the intimate union of the creature with God. In 
other words these mystics held that experience and love are 
the springs whence alone true knowledge can be drawn : to 
the logical faculty they gave but the subordinate function of 
arranging and formulating the knowledge thus acquired. In 
the Holy Scriptures and in the teaching of the Fathers of 
the Church they looked for the witness of that spiritual 
experience which is conserved in the Catholic Church by the 
Divine Spirit dwelling therein : but they held that this wit 
ness can be adequately apprehended only by the believing 
soul inflamed with love of the truth revealed. 

With these mystical schools the Franciscan spirit was, as 
we have said, akin ; and thither it might safely go to seek its 
mental stimulus and discipline, provided the friar kept in view 
just one point of difference between the learning desirable for 
a Friar Minor and that of the established schools. The differ 
ence was this. The Friar Minor was by vocation a missionary 
and apostle ; he was set to bring the Gospel to the people either 
by word or by example. Even the mystic may become one 
of a class apart from the multitude of men in their spiritual 
life and wander into some by-path where the common ele 
mental experiences of men raise no call for sympathy or con 
sideration. But to the mind of Francis, the Friars Minor must 
always keep a hold of the hand of all humankind in its striving 
after the spiritual life : they must form no aristocracy even in 
their sacred studies but keep intact their moral fellowship with 
the ignorant and unlearned. In their sermons and discourses 
they must speak simply and briefly so that the poorest and 



THE FEIAES ESTABLISH A SCHOOL 309 

most ignorant people might understand and derive profit. 1 
Moreover the most learned brother must be willing and able 
to set aside his learning and serve men, when need be, in com 
mon and menial service. Study, however sacred, must never 
displace that life of Poverty which implied a sympathetic 
understanding of the life of the poor whether spiritual, mental 
or material. These truths Francis insistently urged upon the 
learned brethren. Thus one day when a brother was cutting 
his tonsure, Francis bade him be careful to cut only a small 
tonsure, "for," he said, "I wish that my simple brethren 
should have a share in my head ". 2 It was a warning to the 
brethren who were clerics that they must be such that the 
unlearned as well as the learned should be at home with 
them. 

To the end Francis watched the formation of schools for 
the brethren with some trepidation of spirit. For Anthony 
and such as he, there was no cause to fear ; but for the many 
others he feared lest the love of study should cause them to 
lose the simplicity of spirit which belonged to their vocation. 

Of the later story of the Franciscan schools and their 
great influence on the development of thought in the thir 
teenth and fourteenth centuries, this is not the place to 
speak. Only here we will remark that their best influence 
was due to Francis persistency that intellectual studies should 
be subordinated to life itself and in no way lead them astray 
from the vocation which they had vowed. It was this which 
gave to the Franciscan schoolmen a certain marked in 
dividuality of thought and to the Franciscan preachers their 
peculiar power with the people : and that will be the justi 
fication of Francis in his opposition to Peter Stacia and his 
kind. 

1 Regula ii. cap. ix. 3 II Celano, 193. 



CHAPTER VIII. 
THE TRIAL OF FRANCIS. 

THE two years immediately following the General Chapter 
of 1221 may well be described as the agony of Francis. 
Like thunderclouds the troubles about the Eule descended 
r ^V} Coupon his spirit, oppressing him with forebodings and weari 
ness and despondency. 

This was indeed the great trial of his faith in the Order 
he had founded, and even in the vocation in which he had 
led the brethren. In the early days his faith had been tested 
by the allurements and mockery of the world he had left ; but 
then he had found in the trial the stimulating joy of a newly 
found love and loyalty. The future had lain before him as a 
caressing vision of hope and liberty ; and as the years grew 
upon each other, this vision had justified itself in the forma 
tion of the fraternity and the beauteous lives of many 
brethren : and ever at the heart of Francis there was the 
deepening sense of joy until that doubt concerning the 
wisdom of his teaching had entered into the fraternity. 

Then there came to Francis that vital pain which can 

\\ come only to a man from the contradiction of the people he 

ihas nurtured and loved as his own life. The lightness and 

buoyancy seemed now to have passed from his spirit and a 

new note entered into his utterances. He was no longer the 

leader full of the thrilling assurance of victory and the loyalty 

of his own following, whose words glow with confidence even 

when rebuking. He became as one bearing witness against 

betrayal and disloyalty. 

To this soreness of spirit was added an increasing physi 
cal weakness and pain. He had returned from the East, 
broken in health, and the disease which within a few years 

310 



THE TKIAL OF FRANCIS 311 

was to end his life was already making life a torture. 1 But 
the physical pain he could have borne blithely enough: it 
was the mental suffering which brought black night into his 
soul. Hitherto he had seen so clearly the purpose of God 
in the formation of the fraternity ; now it was as though 
God were withdrawing His guiding Hand and the powers of 
evil were let loose. 

The immediate effect upon Francis himself was a certain 
restriction of that liberty of soul which had hitherto been so 
distinctive a trait of his character. He became acutely fearful 
of evil and wrongdoing. The Gospel liberty which he cher- 
rished as a condition of the service of love, he now saw beset 
with dangers from the incursion of a worldliness of mind 
which only too readily would wrest this liberty to the destruc 
tion of the Rule. 

This haunting dread of evil now tinged his words and 
personal conduct with a harshness really foreign to his own 
spirit. Thus in the earlier days he had allowed the brethren 
to receive money in cases of necessity for the relief of the 
lepers ; now he began to discourage this liberty, seeing how 
many of the brethren had not a firm faith in absolute poverty. 2 
So too in his teaching concerning obedience a change is per 
ceptible. Hitherto he had asked of the brethren an obedience 
founded in mutual charity, a submission to each other and 
to all men, warmed and transfused with the impelling activity 
of love. Now this jubilant note of self -submission is lacking. 
The obedient brother he likens to a corpse without will of 
its own, moved hither and thither by the will of others. 3 
The emphasis is laid on the submission rather than on the 
charity which impels to submission. 

Another instance of the change which had come over 
Francis was in his relations with the sisters at San Damiano. 
Regarding them as members of the fraternity of Poverty, he 
had for them a chivalrous affection as pure and detached 
from any earthliness as it was sincere. He was to them a 

1 Of. Spec. Perfect, cap. 91. 

2 Of. II Celano, 68. The permission is retained in the Rule of 1221, but 
not in that of 1223. 

3 II Celano, 152 ; Spec. Perfect, cap. 48. 



312 LIFE OF ST. FEANCIS OF ASSIST 

gentle knight, succouring them in their needs and supporting 
them with his courage and counsel in the high path of their 
vocation. Between him and them there was the exalted 
intercourse of souls too utterly absorbed in a vision beyond 
themselves to entertain any lesser desire. So it had been 
since Clare first entered the brotherhood, and no thought that 
evil might come to others from this wise and noble inter 
course, had darkened the soul of Francis. But now he was 
troubled lest in this too others might wrest the liberty of the 
children of God to their own spiritual harm. 

He ceased therefore to visit the sisters. And it might 
easily have come about at this time that the sisters would 
have been entirely separated from the fraternity and left 
without the direction of the brethren even in spiritual matters 
had not Clare herself intervened to save the situation. With 
a woman s instinct she divined the trouble in Francis mind 
and its probable consequences to herself and the sisters, and 
with a woman s courage she set herself to defend Francis 
against himself. Through some of the brethren she protested 
against his self-imposed estrangement from San Damiano, 
setting forth that it was a betrayal of his promised care of 
them. In his pain Francis replied to those who brought the 
protest : " Think not, dear brethren, that I do not love them 
perfectly ; for if it were a fault to cherish them in Christ, was 
it not a greater fault to have united them to Christ ? And 
indeed it had been no wrong not to call them, but not to care 
for them when called were the utmost unkindness. But I am 
giving you an example, that as I am doing, so also should 
you do." In the end he was prevailed upon to visit the 
sisters and to preach to them. Yet even then the trouble was 
present : for whilst the sisters were waiting upon his words, 
he took some ashes and sprinkling them upon the ground 
around him and upon his head, he recited the psalm Miserere 
and immediately took his departure. But some say that 
Clare did not rest until she persuaded Francis to dine with her 
and some of the sisters in proof of his fatherly care for them. 1 

1 Vide II Celano, 205-7 : The incident recorded in Actus, cap. 15, and 
Fioretti, cap. 15, should probably be read in conjunction with the passages 



THE TEIAL OF FKANCIS 313 

In his distress Francis now frequently withdrew from the 
larger company of the brethren and betook himself to secluded 
hermitages, where in solitary prayer he wrestled with the evil 
which had come upon him and the fraternity. 1 At times 
when reports were brought to him of brethren who were de 
parting from the proper ways of the fraternity he would break 
out into bitter lamentation. Such reports were like the touch 
of a coarse hand to his raw spirit. Thus hearing one day that 
certain brethren were growing long beards out of a love of 
novelty, and it would seem to impress the people with an 
appearance of austerity, he uttered this cry to heaven: "O 
Lord Jesus Christ Who didst choose Apostles twelve in num 
ber, and though one of them fell, yet did the others cleave to 
Thee and, filled with one spirit, did preach the holy Gospel : 
Thou, Lord, in this last hour, remembering Thy mercy of 
old, didst plant the religion of the brethren to be a prop to 
Thy Faith, that through them the mystery of Thy Gospel 
might be fulfilled. Who then shall make satisfaction for 
them before Thee, if they not only do not set examples of 
light to all men, for which purpose they were sent, but rather 
show forth the works of darkness ? By Thee most holy Lord 
and by all the heavenly court, and by me thy poor little one, 
let them be cursed who by their evil example put to shame 
and destroy what Thou hast built up hitherto by the holy 
brethren of this Order and dost not cease to build up." 2 Of 
others he bitingly exclaimed : " These sons of a father who 
was a beggar, will not be ashamed some day to wear the scarlet 
cloth of gallants with only a change of colour ". 3 

Yet it must not be thought that these traitorous brethren 

cited from Celano. Doubtless the author of the Actus has embellished the 
story, but on general principles (vide infra, p. 441) we must accept the fact that 
Francis dined with Clare in token of the amity between them. 

1 II Celano, 157. 

2 II Celano, 156. Eccleston says that after the Chapter at which John 
Parent! was elected Minister-General, Brother Elias retired to a hermitage and 
allowed his hair and beard to grow, and that by this pretence of sanctity 
(simulatio sanctitatis) he regained the good-will of che brethren (cf. ed. Little, 
p. 81). 

3 II Celano, 69 ; Spec. Perfect, cap. 15. In I Celano, 16, the same phrase 
is used referring to Francis in hi.s youth : " qui quondam scarulaticis utebatur ". 



314 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSISI 

represented the whole fraternity, or that the dissident ministers 
carried with them all the brethren. Could the difficulty have 
been settled by an appeal to the loyalty of the brethren to the 
person of Francis, undoubtedly the greater number in the 
fraternity would have rallied to his side. But between Francis 
and the brethren there was now a legally organized system 
of government and many of the chief offices were in the 
hands of dissident ministers, at least in Italy ; and these were 
the more worldly-wise amongst the brethren and in their 
worldly wisdom lay their power. They too had their following. 

Amongst those who adhered to Francis and the primi 
tive ways, were some who blamed him for not dealing more 
cavalierly with his opponents : if Francis would only take the 
reins of government into his own hands and depose the dissi 
dent ministers, all would be well. Sometimes they would 
come to him and upbraid him for casting into strange hands 
the care of the fraternity. But Francis had gauged the situa 
tion better than they and he knew himself. To one who thus 
upbraided him he replied : " My son, I love the brethren as far 
as I can, but if they would follow in my ways I would indeed 
love them more, nor would I make myself a stranger unto 
them. But some there are amongst the superiors who draw 
them other ways, proposing to them the example of the 
ancients and esteeming my counsels but little ; but in the end 
it will appear more clearly what they do and in what manner 
they are doing it . " l Francis preferred wisely to let the recalci 
trant ministers have their way for awhile, trusting that in the 
end their opposition would defeat itself by manifesting clearly 
its inherent worldliness. At another time when he was again 
urged to depose certain ministers who were clinging to office 
and abusing their trust, he answered : " Let them live as they 
like, for the damnation of a few is of lesser moment than the 
loss of many ". 2 

For things eventually came to this pass that very easily 
might a schism have occurred in the fraternity. The line 
taken by the dissident ministers had brought about a 
cleavage of feeling and the brethren were now morally 

1 II Celano, 188 ; Spec. Perfect, cap. 41. 2 ibid, 



THE TEIAL OF FRANCIS 315 

divided into two camps : those who stood by the primitive 
observance and those who favoured a more secular policy. 
Moreover, in the general disturbance there were some who 
lost all idea of subordination to authority and went their 
own individual ways in defiance of their superiors. 1 Nor was 
there now that union of heart amongst the brethren which 
in earlier days had made poverty joyous and lightsome. 
Quarrels and angry words were no longer unknown and there 
was a tendency to take life easily and to shirk labour. 2 

Undoubtedly the vast increase in the number of the breth 
ren had much to do with this laxity of discipline. In such 
a multitude as they now were, it were impossible but that many 
would be drawn to the Order by the prevalent enthusiasm of the 
moment rather than by any real purpose of self-renunciation. 
The Order had become popular, which is always a danger 
to any religious society. Francis himself recognized the 
difficulty. "Would that there were fewer Friars Minor ! " 
he once exclaimed, " and that the world seeing a Friar Minor 
but rarely should wonder at their fewness." 3 And yet he had 
felt constrained to open wide the door of the fraternity as 
Christ had opened wide the door of His Church. 

This laxity of discipline on the part of some tended to 
complicate the issue between Francis and the ministers : it 
gave colour to the plea that the idealism of the Rule was too 
heroic for ordinary mortals and was an evidence to the ancient 
Rules which could be more easily enforced. 

Never did the real strength of Francis show itself more 
splendidly than in the situation thus created. A weaker, less 
temperate man would have taken one of two lines of action. 
Either in despair of his own idealism he would have sur 
rendered or he would have so set himself in opposition as to 
have produced a schism or even the total disruption of the 
fraternity. Francis did neither. Dear to him above all else 

J Cf. II Celano, 32; Conformit,, in Anal. Franc, iv. pp. 432-3. On 18 
Dec. 1223, Honorius III issued the bull: " Fratrum Minorum," excommuni 
cating those who left the fraternity (Sbaralea, Bull. i. p. 19). 

2 Of. Spec. Perfect, cap. 52 ; Conformit. in Anal. Franc, iv. p. 445. 

3 II Celano,l70. 



316 LIFE OF ST. FRANCIS OF ASSISI 

was the vocation of Poverty ; but as part of this supreme affec 
tion was his love of the brotherhood which he held to be the 
God-designed witness on earth to the Poverty he worshipped : 
and right loyally he strove by prayer and example and exhorta 
tion to keep it intact. True, if it could not be maintained in 
honourable fidelity to the evangelical observances of Poverty, 
he would rather that it were not maintained at all. And 
there were times when it seemed to him that it would come 
to this that the faithful servitors of the Eule would be driven 
from the community and be forced to seek the life of Poverty 
in secluded hermitages away in the forests and wildernesses. 1 
In dread of this ultimate evil overtaking the Order, he 
made it known that should the body of the fraternity abandon 
the path of Poverty, the brethren who purposed to remain 
faithful might with his sanction and blessing separate from 
the faithless community and go and dwell apart. Thus a 
German friar once came to him with this petition : " If in my 
days the brethren turn aside from the pure observance of the 
Kule as thou, speaking by the Holy Ghost, hast foretold, give 
me thy command that I, alone or together with other brothers 
who wish to observe the Rule purely, shall draw apart from 
those who do not observe it ". Francis listened with great joy ; 
then blessed the brother, saying : " By Christ and by me, what 
you ask is granted you ; " and placing his right hand on the 
other s head he added : " Thou art a priest for ever according 
to the order of Melchisedeck ". 2 

It is said that in his final Rule of 1223 he wished to insert 
a clause granting a like liberty to all the brethren in similar 
circumstances. 3 

But this liberty had reference to that ultimate calamity 
when the brethren should find their allegiance to the com 
munity a betrayal of the allegiance they owed the Rule. In 
such a situation Francis recognized but one honourable duty, 
allegiance to the Rule they had vowed. But short of this 
final calamity Francis counselled patience. Some there were 
amongst the more faithful brethren who would at once have 

1 Conformit. in Anal. Franc, iv. p. 428. 

"Legcnda Vetus, cap. 3, in Opuscules, p. 96. 3 Vide infra, p. 323. 



THE TEIAL OF FEANCIS 317 

separated from the party of the ministers and thus have 
broken up the fraternity. But to this suggestion Francis 
would not listen. Better, as long as may be, to suffer perse 
cution at the hands of the ministers for justice sake : for he 
yet trusted that by this patient suffering the whole fraternity 
would be purified and brought back to its proper allegiance. 
So for the guidance of these suffering brethren he had this 
" admonition" written down : "If a prelate command a sub 
ject anything against his soul, it is lawful for the subject not 
to obey him, nevertheless the subject must not cast the pre 
late off; and if in consequence the subject suffer persecution 
from some, let him love them the more. For he who would 
rather endure persecution than wish to be separated from his 
brethren, truly abides in perfect obedience, since he lays 
down his life for the brothers." And knowing that there 
were some who would gladly separate, not so much for the 
sake of the better observance of the Eule but to follow their 
own will, he added : " For there are many religious who under 
the pretext of seeking better things than those commanded 
by their superiors, look back and return to the vomit of their 
own will. These are homicides and by their bad example 
cause the loss of many souls." 1 

As for himself, faithful to the vision of the Lord Christ, 
which was the light of his life, he met the opposition of the 
ministers and the unspiritual tendencies which were showing 
themselves amongst the brethren, with the same exalted 
patience and courageous meekness to which he exhorted 

i Admonitio III in Opuscula, p. 7. Both in the Rule of 1221 and that of 
1223 Francis inserted a regulation ordering the brethren who could not observe 
the Rule spiritually to have recourse to their ministers. " The ministers are 
to receive them kindly and charitably," etc. (Reg. 1223, cap. x.). This regula 
tion evidently refers to those who need a greater liberty in the observance of 
the Rule, following as it does upon the command that the brethren obey their 
superiors " in all things they have promised the Lord to observe and which 
are not against their soul or our Rule ". 

Fr. Paschal Robinson in his translation of the Rule (vide The Writ 
ings of St. Francis, p. 72) has inserted in brackets " the culprits," as though 
those having recourse had committed some fault ; whereas the brethren hav 
ing recourse as implied in this chapter of the Rule are the brethren desirous 
of more perfect observance. Of. Conformit. in Anal. Franc, pp. 422-3. 



318 LIFE OF ST. FRANCIS OF ASSIST 

others. When urged to use his legal authority and force 
observance of the Rule by penalties, he replied: "I am not 
minded to become an executioner to punish and scourge them 
like magistrates of this world : my office is spiritual only, 
namely to overcome their vices and spiritually to correct them 
by my words and example "^ 

At times indeed the native instinct of domination which in 
early years had made him aspire to be captain of a following, 
would assert itself, as when on an occasion he cried out : 
" If I come to the Chapter I will show them of what kind 
my will is ". 2 But always he corrected himself by recalling 
the humility and meekness proper to a Friar Minor ; as in 
this picture he drew of his proper conduct at the Chapter. " It 
seemeth to me," he said to his companion, " that I am not a 
true Friar Minor save I be in the state I will tell you. Be 
hold the brethren with great devotion invite me to the Chap 
ter, and moved by their devotion I go to the Chapter with 
them. And when they are gathered together they beseech me 
to announce the Word of God unto them and preach among 
them. And rising up I preach to them as the Holy Spirit shall 
have taught me. Now suppose when the preaching is ended 
that all cry out against me : We will not have you reign over 
us ; for you are not eloquent as is befitting, and you are too 
simple and unlearned and we are sore ashamed to have such 
a superior over us, so simple and despised : wherefore do not 
presume to be called our superior. And so they cast me out 
with contumely and disgrace. It seems to me I am no Friar 
Minor if I do not rejoice when they hold me of no account 
and cast me out with shame." 3 

Thus he would keep himself fast in the spirit of the vo 
cation he had vowed. Not as the lords of the earth but as 
the suffering Christ, would he overcome the evil which had 
arisen up against him. 

At the Pentecost Chapter of 1223 the question of a revised 
Rule was again discussed. 4 Not unlikely Cardinal Ugolino 

1 Spec. Perfect, cap. 71 ; Scripta Fr. Leonis, loc. cit. p. 97. 
2 II Celano, 188 ; Spec. Perfect, cap. 41. 3 Spec. Perfect, cap. 64. 

4 Cf. Epistola in. " Ad quemdam Ministrum," in Opuscula, p, 109 seq. This 
letter was evidently written in 1223; it alludes to "chapters in the Bule 



THE TEIAL OF FEANCIS 319 

had persuaded Francis of the necessity of recasting the Eule 
with a view to obtaining the final and solemn approbation of 
the Holy See. It was becoming more and more urgent that 
the fraternity should have a Eule weighted with an authority 
none of the brethren could call in question. 

True, Innocent III had sanctioned the original Eule ; but 
his verbal approval in its very nature left the Eule in a transi 
tional stage, and gave the brethren a legitimate freedom to 
modify or extend its provisions as experience should require, 
and subject to ecclesiastical authority to alter its character. 
That fact the learned ministers, experts in canon law, knew 
full well. Moreover, as it stood with its many additional re 
gulations, the Eule could hardly claim to have received Papal 
sanction. Its authority therefore was a matter of doubt and 
debate, and the fraternity was consequently without a final 
legal appeal within itself. It had been different in the earlier 
years when the brethren had accepted the word of Francis in 
unquestioning faith ; but the governance by faith had now in 
large measure given place to the governance by law, and it 
was the more needful that the Eule should be definitely de 
fined by the highest authority in the Church. 

But from a legal point of view the Eule of 1221 was open 
to objection. It was too diffuse a document, a patchwork, 
as we have seen, of the original Eule and capitular decrees 
and papal enactments and of lengthy admonitions ; and in its 
general character it set forth a prophetic vision of perfection 
rather than a workable code of discipline for the ordinary 
mortals who must enter into so vast a society : and without 
any doubt Cardinal Ugolino had urged upon Francis the need 
of giving to the Eule a more concise and legal form, such as 
the Holy See would require before giving its final approval. 1 

So once again Francis set himself to rewrite the Eule. 
Very tremulous was he at putting his hand to the Eule which 

which speak of mortal sins," viz. chapters v. xm. and xx. of the Rule of 1221, 
and suggests an amendment which actually appears in the Rule of 1223. 

1 Ugolino s part in the final revision of the Rule is plainly indicated in 
the bull " Quo elongati " of 28 September, 1230 (Sbaralea, Bull. i. p. 68) : " In 
condendo prcedictam regulam obtinendo confirmationem ipsius per Sedem Apos- 
tolicam, sibi astiterimus ". 



320 LIFE OF ST. FEANCIS OF ASSISI 

he had already written, lest it should be like the irreverent 
touch of Oza upon the ark of the Lord. But one night whilst 
this trouble was upon him he dreamt that he had gathered 
from the ground tiny crumbs of bread with which to feed a 
hungry multitude of brethren. And so small were the crumbs 
that he feared lest in the distribution they would fall from his 
hands. Then a voice called out to him : Francis, make of all 
these crumbs one host and so feed those who wish to be fed. 
This he did : and as many of the brethren who would not 
receive the host, or, who having received, scorned it, were 
at once struck with leprosy. This dream puzzled Francis, 
for he felt that it was an answer to his prayer, and yet he 
could not tell its meaning. But the next day as he was again 
praying, he heard a voice, saying : " Francis, the crumbs of 
last night, are the words of the Gospel : the host is the Rule ; 
the leprosy is wickedness". 1 Francis took his dream as a 
divine intimation that he must rewrite the Rule. 

But for this task he would retire far from the clamorous 
multitude. Taking with him two companions, Brothers Leo 
and Bonizzo, he left the Porziuncola and went to a secluded 
spot in the mountains near Rieti, known as Monte Rainerio. 2 
It was a wild rock-cavern far up the mountain side, reached 
by a precipitous pass. The mountain was densely wooded ; 
the cavern overlooked a wild dingle which lay far below where 
a mountain-stream rushed down a strong course. On the brow 
of the mountain was a house belonging to the Lady Columba, 
a pious widow, who gave Francis the freedom of her moun 
tain estate, and supplied him with food, whilst respecting his 
wish for solitude. 

At Monte Rainerio nature is a veritable god of strength. 
There is in its aspect and in the view of the towering peaks 
which stretch away darkly into the Abruzzi, a sense of inde 
structible might, most impressive in its majesty : and the 

1 II Celano, 209 ; Leg. Maj. cap. iv. 2. 

2 It is now known as Fonte Colombo, which name, I was told when I was 
there, is derived from Fundus Columbce, the estate of the Lady Columba. But 
in the Speculum Perfectionis the retreat of Francis on Monte Bainerio is named 
Eremitorum de Fonte Columbannn (capp. 67, 110, 115). 



THE TRIAL OF FEANCIS 321 

vast stillness of its solitude is as the stillness of a massive soul. 
Perhaps it was this which drew Francis to seek refuge there 
in this crisis of his great trouble : for never did he need strength 
more than now. The Rule was written, Francis praying and 
fasting meanwhile ; and afterwards he returned to the Por- 
ziuncola and delivered what he had written to Brother Elias, 
the Vicar-General, that he might make it known to the minis 
ters. Then happened a curious thing. After a few days 
Elias told Francis that the new Rule was lost through some 
body s carelessness ! l A most strange carelessness surely ; 
and one cannot but think that it was purposely destroyed, but 
whether by Elias or by some other, we cannot say. Nor does it 
matter who actually destroyed it : this only we can say without 
contradiction that Elias and the dissident ministers would have 
none of it. The new Rule, if shorter in form than the Rule 
of 1221, yet contained all the provisions to which the ministers 
objected. They clamoured that the brethren should be al 
lowed to receive and hold sufficient corporate property to safe 
guard them against penury. 2 Other religious orders held 
property ; why not they ? Francis could but reply as he had 
always replied, that God had called them to follow Christ in 
the way of most high poverty such as he and the brethren had 
practised in the beginning, and that he would not prove a 
traitor to his calling. 

Again Francis went back to his retreat on Monte Rai- 
neiro, sad at heart because of this persistent opposition, and 
again with prayer and fasting he dictated to Brother Leo 3 
the new Rule. But the ministers, now thoroughly disturbed, 

1 Leg. Maj. iv. 11 ; cf. Spec. Perfect, cap. 1 ; Verba S. Franc, no. 2, in 
Documenta Antiqua, ed. Lemmens, pars i. p. 101. St. Boriaventuro says that 
Elias "asserted it was lost through carelessness" " assereretper incuriam 
perditam; " but the Spec. Perfect, and the Verba simply say it was lost, with 
out casting any blame upon Elias. It is not improbable that the first draft 
of the new Rule was written before the Pentecost Chapter, and that it was 
from Monte Rainerio that Francis wrote his letter " ad qucmdam ministrum" 
above referred to. 

2 Verba S. Franc, loc. cit. p. 101. 

3 Cf. Ubertino da Casale, Arbor Vitae, lib. v. cap. 3 : " nam quod sequitor 
a sancto fratre Conrado pradicto et viva voce audivit a sancto fratre Leone qui 
presens erat et regulam scripsit ". 

21 



322 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS iOF ASSIST 

pursued him to his solitude, protesting they would not observe 
the Rule as he had written it. Francis met them with a 
righteous indignation in which scorn blended with sorrow, 
and bade them if they would not observe the Rule to leave 
the Order. 1 

Now it is impossible to say exactly what rearrangement 
Francis made of the former Rule of 1221, in those suffering 
days on Monte Raineiro : for when the Rule was again 
written out he went with it to Rome to present it to 
Cardinal Ugolino before submitting it to the Pope for ap 
proval, and it is possible that it was then that the Cardinal 
persuaded Francis to omit certain regulations to which the 
ministers objected. Most notable in the Rule as finally 
sanctioned is the omission of the chapter of the primitive 
Rule approved by Innocent III, which says in the words of the 
Gospel: "When the brethren travel through the world let 
them carry nothing by the way, neither bag nor purse, nor 
bread, nor money, nor a staff," etc. 2 This evangelical ad 
monition had more than any other been the formative 
influence of the Franciscan vocation ; it was the most com 
plete expression of that sublime trust in the providence of 
God, upon which the life of the fraternity was established, 
and from its observance came most of the characteristic 
traits in the primitive Franciscan story. 3 Francis would not 
willingly have deleted such a chapter, and it could only have 
been at the Cardinal s urging that he was prevailed upon to 
do so ; and to overcome the scandal of the ministers op 
position. 4 After all the Cardinal might point out, the Rule 
commanded absolute poverty, and in that precept this other 
was essentially contained. 

1 Gf. Spec. Perfect, cap. 1; Verba S. Franc., loc. cit. pp. 101-2. See the 
account given in the Actus 8. Franc, in Valle Reatina, a fifteenth century 
document, and published by M. Sabatier in Legenda Antiquissima, pp. 255-61. 
Of. Conformit. in Anal. Franc, iv. p. 516 ; Angelo Clareno, Expositio Re- 
gulae, fol. 43 b. 

2 Vide supra, p. 89. 

3 Of. e.g. 3 Soc. cap. 11 ; Chron. Jordani, in Anal. Franc, i, no. 6, p. 3. 

4 " Quia valde timuit scandalum in se etinfratres" says the Spec. Perfect. 
cap. 2. 



THE TEIAL OF FEANCIS 323 

Other precepts Francis wished to insert in the new Eule 
which the ministers would not have. There was, for instance, 
a precept concerning the reverence due to the Blessed Sacra 
ment. If the brethren on their journeys through the world 
should find the Blessed Sacrament reserved in unbecoming 
pyxes or tabernacles they were to admonish the priests to 
make a more honourable provision, and if the priests failed, 
the brethren were to do this in their stead. In practice such 
a rule would undoubtedly have caused friction between the 
friars and the clergy. 1 But whether these regulations were 
omitted in the draft of the Eule which Francis brought with 
him from Monte Eainerio or were afterwards deleted, we 
cannot say. One chapter in the new Eule, however, seems 
to have been changed whilst it was under the examination of 
the Holy See. Francis, in the tenth chapter, had given licence 
and obedience to the brethren to observe the Eule literally, 
even against the wishes of the ministers. But the Pope 
caused this chapter to be amended in this wise, that whilst 
the liberty to observe the Eule is retained, the obligation to 
grant this liberty rests with the ministers, and the liberty is 
not at the discretion of the subjects themselves. 2 

And so after much patient travail of body and spirit on 
the part of Francis the new Eule was at last completed. As 
one reads it, one misses the exuberance of admonition and 
aspiration which were native to Francis : it is as though his 
spirit had been chastened. Of the essential principles of the 
vocation he surrendered nothing. The new Eule still binds 
the brethren to absolute poverty ; postulants on entering the 
fraternity must first distribute their goods to the poor ; the 

1 Spec. Perfect, cap. 65. 

2 Of. Legenda Veins, 2, in Opuscules de Critique, i. pp. 93-5. Already in 
the Rule of 1221 (cap. 6) it was laid down that the brethren who could not 
observe the Rule in some particular place should have recourse to the minister 
who was bound to provide for the brethren " sicut ipse vellet sibi fieri ". 
Practically the same regulation appears in the Rule of 1223, but with this 
difference. The wording of the latter Rule, both as it bears on the liberty of 
the subject to have recourse and also on the duty of the minister to listen to 
the petition, is more emphatic. This more emphatic wording of the Rule of 
1223 is in favour of the authenticity of the story told in Legenda Veins. Cf. 
Hist. vn. Trib. in Erhle, Archiv. in. p. 601. 

21* 



324 LIFE OF ST. FRANCIS OF ASSISI 

brethren must be content with poor garments ; they must be 
peaceful and humble and refrain from judging others ; they 
must work, yet so as not to extinguish in themselves the 
spirit of prayer, and in cases of necessity they must go ask 
ing alms with confidence ; they must not own any house or 
lands or anything else but be as pilgrims and strangers in 
this world. 

All through it is still the same life set forth as of old : 
only, as we have said, set forth in a more chastened mood. 
Yet, wrought as it was in the crucible of sorrow and heart- 
pain, the Eule had gained perhaps a certain strength and 
durability even if it had lost something of its inspiring ideal 
ism. We may say that it gives us more purely the essential 
Francis of all time if less of the historical Francis of a 
particular period. And with every law-giver whose law is a 
reflex of his own life, it is needful that the more essential self 
be separated from its immediate and transitory expression : so 
only will his law endure : and this separation is usually 
wrought in the fire of contradiction. So was it with Francis. 

The Eule was solemnly approved by Pope Honorius III 
on 29 November, 1223. 1 

Were the recalcitrant ministers satisfied ? It would seem 
not. Elias, the Vicar-General, as we know, refused to con 
sider himself bound by it, claiming in after times that he had 
not made any profession of it ; 2 and some of the ministers 
so interpreted it as to cause Francis sorrow even to the end 
of his life. 

But now there gradually settled upon the spirit of Francis 
a great peace. Finally and irrevocably he had vindicated the 
right of absolute poverty for the children of God. 

One day as he was still sorrowing over the false brethren 
there came to his spirit this comfort from the Lord Christ : 
" poor little man, why are you distressed ? Have I so set 
you a shepherd over My religion that you know not that I 
am its chief Protector ? I set over it you, a simple man, to 

1 The text will be found in Sbaralea, Bull. i. pp. 15-19 ; Seraph. Legislat. 
Textus, pp. 35 seq. 

2 Eccleston [ed. Little], col. xiii. p. 85. 



THE TKIAL OF FKANCIS 325 

the end that those who will, may follow you in those things 
I work in you for an example to others. It is I who have 
called them ; I who will keep and feed them ; and I will make 
good the falling away of some by putting others in their place, 
in such wise that if these others be not born I will cause them 
to be born. Be not therefore perturbed but work out thy 
salvation ; for even if the religion should come to but three 
members, yet through My gift shall it remain unshaken." l 

Another time as he was praying in the chapel of the Por- 
ziuncola, this word came to his spirit : " Francis, if thou wilt 
have faith as a grain of mustard seed, thou shalt bid a moun 
tain remove and it shall remove ". Francis asked : " Which is 
the mountain I should wish to remove?" The interior 
voice replied : " The mountain is thy temptation ". And in 
tears Francis said : " Be it done unto me, Lord, as Thou 
hast said ". 2 

Thus was his spirit renewed in peace as when a man has 
battled with a great terror and the terror has vanished. 
Suffering did not pass from him, nor did the doings of the 
recalcitrant brethren commend them to him. Much that 
was passing in the life of the fraternity was to him as a 
dim mystery. But the fraternity, itself the pledge of the 
truth of that revelation of Poverty which was his life, would 
endure in the keeping of God : and with that assurance 
he was content. And now it remained for him to complete 
in himself this work of God, to the glory of Christ and as an 
example to those who willed to follow him. 

J II Celano, 158; Spec. Perfect, cap. 8 ; Leg. Maj. cap. vm. 3. 

2 Celano, 115; Spec. Perfect, cap. 99. This "temptation of the spirit" 
which lasted " several years " according to Celano, and " more than two 
years " according to the Speculum Perfect., evidently from the context happened 
in Francis later years, and most likely was concerned with his troubles with 
the ministers. 



BOOK IV. 

CHAPTEK I. 
"GRECCIO." 

PASSING from the valley of Spoleto into the valley of Kieti 
to the south, the traveller is at once conscious of being in a 
new country, notwithstanding that in the maps the high 
mountain-bound district of Kieti is marked as a portion of 
Umbria. 

There is a certain aloofness both in the character of the 
land and of the people ; an aloofness not at all unkindly. On 
the contrary, you will find there a genial hospitality, a de 
sire to make the stranger at home. Yet is there a certain 
princely air in the way Kieti dispenses of its best, such as you 
frequently find amongst unconquered people of the hills. The 
ravages of war and foreign domination and incessant rebellion 
have not lain so heavily upon this upland valley as upon the 
more populous and suave valley of Spoleto to the north ; though 
Kieti too has seen foreign armies march through its mountain 
passes and along its open roads. But Kieti is somewhat apart 
from the main thoroughfares of the world, safeguarded by its 
height above the more level roads and by its natural ramparts 
of pass and peak. Nevertheless it. is not too far apart. 
Through it in former days ran one of the main roads from 
Kome to the north ; and in its city the Popes had a palace 
and held court there when they sought a nerve-bracing at 
mosphere away from the sultriness of Rome. But you feel 
sure, as the genius of the place comes home to your con 
sciousness, that even Popes were welcomed here with a cer 
tain sturdy simplicity, and that the Kietans, whilst able to 
appreciate the splendour and vivacity of the court, yet held 

326 



" GKECCIO " 327 

to their mountain valley with a certain proud content. The 
court might come and go, a shadow from the outer world ; 
but the mountains and the valley were always there. It is 
strange how this sense of seclusion with mystic affinities to 
the world-life, grows upon you. Coming from the north, you 
are met at the very entrance to the hill-passes which divide 
the two valleys, by the boisterous waterfalls at Marmore, 
where the river Velino rushes down in a cloud of spray from 
the plateau beyond the hills into the lowland around Terni. 
If you have dwelt long enough in the valley of Spoleto to ab 
sorb something of its historical reminiscences, and to feel the 
intensity and strength of the human life that has played its 
part there, you will suddenly halt at the rushing sound and 
majestic force of the waters ; for the moment you will be 
conscious that here is a new force, the force of nature, and 
as you look to the wall of hills beyond, the awe of that 
mysterious incalculable strength comes upon you. Then 
through a mountain-gorge you come to the Lago di Piediluco 
or as the Franciscan chronicler calls it, the Lake of Eieti 
closely enfolded by steep broken hills above which and be 
yond, you see the mountains ranging away to the clustering 
snow-capped peaks of the Abruzzi. A sailing boat is leisurely 
making its way across the still waters of the lake as I pass by : 
probably the boatman dwells in one of those white villages on 
the shore. 

Through the low hills you enter the upland valley, a wide 
cultivated amphitheatre closely engirdled by the massed 
mountains. The plain is flat save for a hillock here and 
there which you might take for a sheltering island when the 
mists lie on the ground. Far to the south is the gleaming 
city : but inexorably your eye will be drawn to the encom 
passing mountains with their dark gorges and shadowy 
hollows and the occasional village clinging trustfully to some 
steep ascent. There is a great stillness in the bracing at 
mosphere, and a curious sense of seclusion. You miss the 
long mysterious distances of the valley of Spoleto, which to 
north and south sweep past the sentinel hills ; you miss the 
fortress-cities and towns which make the great northern 



328 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSIST 

valley quick with the reminiscences of struggle and ambi 
tion ; you miss the grey, treeless mountains which lie facing 
each other in two drawn-out lines, bidding each other a 
mutual defiance even in their rest. For here in Bieti the 
massed hills and mountain peaks seem as brothers-in-arms 
guarding the plain which they encircle, as men guard the 
sanctity of their home. So jealously do they encircle it that 
you can hardly detect the passes which lead to the outer 
world ; yet withal do they guard it tenderly. On all the 
lower slopes the eye delights in the foliage of woods or in a 
blossoming soil. Bugged and stony are the primitive paths 
by which you climb the hills, yet they lead to homesteads set 
in the midst of olives or of vines : and in all the valley the 
air is at once soft and bracing. In truth in this upland 
cloister, nature has sought to bind men to herself by a 
manifold attraction ; revealing at once her majesty and dire 
strength, her solicitude and providence, her lightsomeness 
and homeliness : as though by this varied revelation of 
beauty she would bring to them a complete detachment from 
the world beyond. No wonder that the peasant is strong 
and blithesome, and that with a kindly humanity clearly indi 
cated in his face and speech there is yet in his air a certain 
detached dignity and other- worldliness as of the mountain peaks 
above him. Nor do we wonder that Francis frequently 
sought shelter in this valley of Bieti amidst the stress and 
distractions of his busy apostolate ; nor that in the years of 
his great trouble it was hither he came to nerve himself for 
endurance and battle. And fitting, too, it was that this wide 
upland retreat should be associated intimately with those 
last years when with the expectancy of death in his mind, 
the clamours of the world were no longer able to disturb the 
deep peace which had now come to him. 

When Francis left Borne after the solemn approbation of 
the Bule by Honorius III, he felt that the supreme act of his 
ministry had been accomplished. He knew that in many 
ways the simplicity of the first years was gone ; but so far as 
he could, he had secured for all who loved the vocation of 
poverty, the liberty to follow it with the supreme sanction of 



"GBECCIO" 329 

the Church. And now he felt that beyond setting the good 
example, his task was finished : and in his new freedom he 
turned all-desiringly to the life hidden with Christ his Lord. 
From this time the world of men will but little disturb the 
soul of Francis : more and more he will be drawn into the 
embrace of the Beloved, and the voices of the earth will reach 
his spirit only through that mystic life which is the border 
land of eternity. 

Christmas was now at hand. It was only two weeks to 
the sweet festival, and Francis was again in the valley of 
Eieti, probably in his rock-cell on Monte Eainerio ; and 
thither he had invited a friend, Giovanni da Vellita, 1 to come 
to him. Giovanni lived at Greccio a few miles northward as 
you follow the road which leads to the lake. He had some 
years earlier met Francis out on one of his preaching tours, 
and had fallen under the spell of his spirit, and become one 
of his informal disciples. He was a man of some substance 
and owned land in his native district, and because he wished 
to induce Francis to dwell occasionally in the neighbourhood 
and also because he knew of Francis love of solitary 
retreats, he had set aside for his use some caves in the high 
rock facing the town of Greccio and had built a rude hermit 
age such as Francis loved, around the caves, where some 
brethren might dwell. Now the town of Greccio is con 
structed as it were on a high rocky ledge within a wide 
hollow. It looks down upon comfortable homesteads and 
vineyards sheltered from the north wind by the bare 
mountain steeps. At the bend of the hollow opposite the 
town the bare rock falls perpendicularly to the lower slopes 
several hundred feet below. At the head of the rock is the 
hermitage given to the brethren by Giovanni ; but around 
the hermitage above the sheer fall of rock, the bareness of 
the mountain is relieved by warm sheltering woods. 

Francis knew the hermitage well, and now he had a long- 

1 S. Bonaventure (Leg. Maj. cap. x. 7) describes Giovanni as : " Miles 
quidam virtuosus et verax, qui propter Christi amorem sceculari relicta militia ". 
From this one might deduce that Giovanni was a Penitent Brother, or as we 
say now, a tertiary. 



330 LIFE OF ST. FRANCIS OF ASSIST 

ing to celebrate the Christmas festival there. In the peace 
which had come back to his soul, the world was again trans 
figured with sacramental types; and as he pondered this 
Advent season upon the mystery of Bethlehem, never before 
had he seemed to thirst so vehemently for the vision of Christ 
on earth. The sweetness of this Divine condescension had 
entered into his soul with a vital urgency ; in spirit he gazed 
upon the love-illumined poverty of the birth of his Lord : and 
he longed even for bodily vision of what he had spiritually 
divined. In earthly form he would that he might behold this 
love-mystery, and thus wed heaven to earth in his apprehen 
sion of it : thus would God become again a dweller amongst 
the things of time. 

So when Giovanni came, Francis said to him : "I would 
make a memorial of that Child Who was born in Bethlehem 
and in some sort behold with bodily eyes the hardships of 
His Infant state, how He lay in a manger on the hay, with 
the ox and the ass standing by. If you will, we shall celebrate 
this festival at Greccio and do you go before and prepare as 
I tell you ". Giovanni therefore went back to Greccio and in 
the wood near the hermitage he had a stable built, with a 
manger : and near the manger an altar. And Francis sent 
word to all the brethren in the valley of Rieti to join him at 
Greccio for the Christmas festival. 

Christmas eve came, and as the time for the midnight 
Mass drew near, the people from the town and from the hol 
low, all flocked to the hermitage, carrying with them lighted 
torches which flicked weird shadows against the hill-side as 
men and women strode sturdily on : and when they gathered 
in a crowd around the stable all that side of the hollow 
seemed ablaze. Francis was the deacon at the Mass, his 
ministrations enthused with the rapture and solicitude of the 
Mother tending her Babe. But when after the Gospel he 
stood forth to preach, the crowd felt as though a hidden mys 
tery was in very deed being revealed to their eyes : so subtly 
did the preacher convey to them his own vision of Bethlehem 
and set them throbbing with his own emotions. 1 He seemed 

1 Fr. Paschal Robinson thinks Francis gained his special devotion to the 
Christmas mystery whilst on his visit to the Holy Land. It is very probable. 



" GEECCIO " 331 

not to be conscious of the crowd before him, but to see only 
the Divine Babe in His mother s care, caressed by poverty 
and worshipped by simplicity. Tenderly he greeted the 
Divine Infant, calling Him "Child of Bethlehem" and 
"Jesus" and as he uttered the words, they lingered on his 
lips with surpassing sweetness; and at the word "Beth 
lehem " he bleated forth the music of the name as though he 
were voicing the worship of the sheep on the Judean hillside. 
At times he would turn to the manger and bend over it 
caressingly. Giovanni, the builder of the crib, afterwards 
averred that he saw a child lying as it were dead in the 
manger, who awakened to life at Francis touch. But all 
the people believed that that night Greccio had become 
another Bethlehem. 1 

During the remaining days of that winter and far into 
the early spring, Francis would seem to have abided in this 
rocky hermitage ; not altogether, however, withdrawn from 
the company of men. For the same love which drew him 
ever nearer to Christ the Beloved in solitude, sent him forth 
again to impart to his fellow-men the gospel of Christ s re 
deeming love. By the people of Greccio and the neighbour 
hood he was revered as teacher and prophet. Many were the 
stories which in after years these grateful folk told of his 
doings amongst them, how he delivered them from the 
ravages of wolves and from pestilences which had brought 
dread and sorrow into their homes, and from the hailstorms 
which had beaten down their vineyards, and so had given 
them a period of happiness ; and how this happiness had 

1 1 Celano, I, xxx. 84-86 ; II Celano, II, vn. 35 ; S. Bonav. Leg. Maj. cap. x. 
7. S. Bonaventure says that Francis had previously obtained the Pope s per 
mission to construct the crib, " ne hoc novitati posset ascribi ". From this it 
would seem that the " crib," now so familiar in Catholic churches at Christ- 
mastide, was not then known. Shortly after Francis death a chapel was built 
on the site of the crib. The chapel still exists ; near it is a larger chapel built 
somewhat later. Until last year the hermitage of Greccio was still an unspoilt 
Franciscan hermitage, reminiscent of the first Franciscan days. But now a 
large church has been built, overshadowing the rude simplicity of the hermit 
age with ambitious modernity. One almost wishes that an ecclesiastical com 
mission for the preservation of ancient shrines might be established to ward off 
modern vandalism of this sort. 



332 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

continued as long as they remembered to serve God as 
Francis had taught them, but was taken from them again 
when they forget his teaching and went back to evil ways. 1 
They remembered, too, how on one occasion he had suddenly 
left them and set out for Perugia, the proud city to the 
north. For Francis had learned in prayer that the Perugians 
were letting armed bands loose upon their neighbours in 
very lust of strife and domination : and in his compassion 
he hurried forth to end the misery. But the people of Perugia 
would not listen to his appeal. Then did Francis foretell that 
within a short while they would be at feud amongst themselves 
and that sorrow and death should come upon them. And so 
it befell. 2 But this story probably belongs ^_to_ _an_earlier 
period in Francis history. 

Thus now in active ministry for souls, now in prayerful 
seclusion, did Francis find his peace the peace of absorption 
in the life of the God-Man who had drawn to Himself all 
the desire of His worshipping disciple. To be with Christ, 
whether in Bethlehem or Nazareth or on the public road or 
on the cross of Calvary that had long been all his thought ; 
and now he seemed to be entering into a realization more in 
timate than even he would have dared to ask for. Love had 
regained its liberty in his soul and with all the purer ardour 
and fullness because of the night of trial in which his faith 
had been tested. And here in the homely neighbourhood of 
Greccio he was tasting the first sweets of his liberty re 
gained. 

The Easter festival found him still in this sacred retreat. 
Amidst all the glorious hopes of the life to come with which 
the mystery of that day filled the soul of Francis, his, heart 
turned clingingly to the earthly price by which they were won. 
Heaven had been gained for men only through the self- 
effacement of Him who being the world s God, yet made 
Himself a mere stranger and pilgrim upon the earth : and in 

1 Of. II Celano, vn. 35, 36. 

2 II Celano, II, vu. 37. The Perugians were constantly fighting amongst 
themselves. W. Heywood (-4 History of Perugia, pp. 35-7) mentions three 
notable civil wars, respectively in 1214, 1218 and 1223. 



"GBECCIO" 333 

the urgency of his love Francis in spirit was a pilgrim with 
his Lord. 

Coming to the refectory of the brethren on that Easter 
day, he found the table laid with unwonted luxury with 
table-cloths and cut-glass and the other appointments of a 
comfortable home, lent for the occasion by some friend of 
the brethren : for the brethren had thought to honour the 
festival in this fashion. But this symbolism of an abiding 
home, was out of accord with Francis vision of his pilgrim 
Lord. Gently yet emphatically did he therefore play the 
part of the pilgrim-Christ. Waiting till the brethren had 
begun their meal, he appeared at the door of the refectory, 
with a poor man s hat on his head and a staff in his hand, 
pilgrim wise ; and called out : " For the love of the Lord 
God give alms to this poor sick pilgrim". The brethren 
hearing the call, bade him enter. Then Francis took a dish 
from the table and after the manner of a lowly servitor, sat 
on the ground. " Now I am seated like a Friar Minor," he 
said, addressing the abashed assembly. " When I saw the 
table so well laid and adorned, I bethought me that it was 
not the table of men who beg their bread from door to door. 
More than all other religious should we be constrained by 
the poverty of the Son of God." And the brethren, at 
least some of them, took the lesson to heart ; one of them 
even wept aloud : for it seemed to them that like the dis 
ciples on the road to Emmaus, Christ had been with them 
and yet they had not known Him. 1 

In truth, to the eyes of those who were with him and who 
loved him, Francis was at this time being caught up more 
and more into the semblance of Him whom his soul loved ; 
and more and more the earth they trod with him became 
transfigured in their thought, as though they were indeed 

1 Cf. II Celano, 61 ; Leg. Maj. cap, vn. ; Spec. Perfect, [ed. Sabatier], 
cap. 20. In the Spec. Perfect, this incident is related as happening on 
a Christmas day ; but Celano and St. Bonaventure both put it at the Easter 
festival and point to the motive indicated in the text. It is not at all im 
probable, as M. Sabatier has suggested (I.e. p. 41, n. 1), that similar incidents 
happened on other occasions ; for Francis never hesitated to repeat himself. 
Cf. II Celano, 200. 



334 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSISI 

living with the Lord Christ Himself in His sojourn upon the 
earth : so irresistibly were they compelled by Francis own 
absorption to walk in the company of the Lord. Perhaps to 
those of them who had stood by and ministered to him in 
his days of trial, there came a sense of loneliness as they felt 
his spirit being thus withdrawn from the need of their 
ministrations by the caress of the Divine Love, and a sweet 
sadness would at times mingle with their worshipful rever 
ence : for they knew they could but stand at the door of the 
sanctuary into which he was entering. And yet because 
they loved him so well their hearts would be uplifted with a 
triumphant gladness : and after all he was yet so near them. 
Amidst the homesteads and sheltered ways of Greccio and 
the Bieti plateau they could not but feel that he was in an 
intimate sense at home with them. And when the time of 
the Pentecost Chapter drew nigh and they must sally forth 
once again into the world s highway, they doubtless looked 
with impatient expectancy to a coming back to Greccio. 

Francis was indeed to return to the valley of Eieti ; but 
not immediately. That was to happen in the meanwhile which 
would put a wondrous seal upon his transfiguration : and 
when he did return, Brother Leo, his faithful friend and dis 
ciple, understood better the mystery which had been brood 
ing over Francis during those winter months of peace. 



CHAPTEK II. 
THE STIGMATA. 

IT was in the month of September that the mysterious event 
occurred which was to set indelibly the seal of his life s 
passion upon the body of Francis as it was already set upon 
his soul. 

About the middle of June he had attended the Pentecost 
Chapter 1 a Chapter to be noted by Englishmen inasmuch 
as Brother Agnellus of Pisa, a man altogether after Francis 
own heart, was then commissioned to establish the Order of 
Friars Minor in England. The story of the coming of 
Agnellus and his brethren has been many times retold in 
these later days ; and how with skilful impetuosity they pushed 
on before the close of the year to Canterbury, London, and 
Oxford, and won from the inhabitants a cordial and abiding 
place for the friars in their midst. 2 

They landed at Dover on the tenth day of September, 
1224 ; 3 they heard the bells of Canterbury calling the people 

1 Pentecost fell in 1224 on 11 June. 

2 Cf. Eccleston, De Adventu FF. Min. in Angliam, first published by Brewer 
in Mon. Franciscana, i. after the Cotton and York codices. A fragment after 
the Lamport codex was published by Hewlett in Mon. Franciscana, n. An 
edition based on these published texts was published in Analecta Franciscana, 
i. ; and a new edition was published in Mon. Germ. Script, xxxin. But the de 
finitive edition has been given by Prof. A. G. Little in Collections des fitudcs, 
torn. vii. Cf. also " Tlie Chronicle of Thomas of Eccleston," translated by the 
present writer ; Tlie Coming of the Friars, by Dr. Jessop. 

3 Wadding (Annales, ad an. 1220) following the Chron. xxiv. Gen., says 
Agnellus was sent to England by the Chapter of 1219, and actually arrived in 
1220. But Eccleston says distinctly: Anno Domini MCCIIIJ tempore 
domini Honorii im-pm . . . feria 3" post festum nativitatis beatce Virginis quod 
illo anno fuit die dominica. Cf. Eccleston [ed. Little], p. 3. Both the 
Chronicle of Lanercost [ed. Stevenson, p. 30] and the Annals of Worcester 

335 



336 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSISI 

to Mass on the feast of the Exaltation of the Holy Cross, 
four days later ; and perhaps to the heart of Agnellus keeping 
an early vigil, there came some intimation of the miracle 
which was happening to him whom he loved so well. 

Not by fortuitous chance had Francis some time before 
the feast of the Assumption of our Lady, gone to Monte 
Alvernia, the high mountain retreat which the lord Orlando 
had many years before set apart for the use of the brethren. 
Something there was in his soul which made him wistful for 
the uttermost seclusion; and for the seclusion of great 
height. 

For the time the sweet homeliness of Greccio would have 
been an imprisonment to his soul, and the battle-training at 
mosphere of Monte Bainerio would have jarred with the sense 
of the mystery which was upon him. His spirit was drawn 
to a rarer atmosphere ; it called for a sublimer aloofness from 
the world of men. So to Monte Alvernia Francis now went, 
which is so far apart from and above the world s highways, 
and where the silence is of the skies and the very air so keen 
and rare. 

Even to-day when a good road has been built to carry the 
pilgrim up the long ascent and a spacious friary crowns the 
summit, Alvernia is awe-inspiring in its remoteness from the 
meeting-places of the world. Far away are towns and 
villages which are but blurs in the landscape below. A rich 
foliage clothes the lower heights, giving comfort to the plain ; 
but above this the mountain-sides are bare and rocky, 
desolate of human comfort : only on the top do the trees 
again appear, casting a grateful shadow in the sunlight. 
And all around, as far as the eye can see, are towering peaks 
gazing upon the sky ; a multitude they are, yet with wide 
distances between as though each were strong to stand alone 
in the wide encompassing space : and, as we have said, the 
air is keen and there is the silence of great height. 

[Annales Monast. iv. p. 416], give the same year 1224, as Eccleston. The 
probability therefore is that Agnellus was actually commissioned by the 
Chapter of 1224 and not by the Chapter of 1219 : since he would hardly have 
allowed five years to elapse before fulfilling his commission : such a delay 
would have been in disaccord with the custom of the brethren. 



THE STIGMATA 337 

To accompany him on his journey and to be the com 
panions of his vigil, Francis chose only his most trusted dis 
ciples. There was Leo, the little lamb of God, most trusted 
of all ; there were besides, Angelo Tancredi, the courteous 
knight, and Masseo the friend of many journeys, and 
Kuffino and Silvestro the contemplatives, and Illuminato who 
had been with him in his crusade in the East, and, as I 
think, Bonizzo, who had tended him in his trial at Monte 
Rainerio. 1 

As yet however he was wholly unaware of the happening 
which was to be : this only he knew, that the aspiration of 
long years was receiving a fulfilment and that a new revela 
tion of the Lord Christ was upon him. On the day of his 
arrival he had chosen a cell apart from the cells of the other 
brethren ; a rude hut under a beech tree. Here he proposed 
to submit himself to the will of his Lord, undisturbed by 
human intrusions : only Brother Leo was to come to him at 
stated times to bring him a little bread and water for his 
bodily refreshment and to assist him spiritually with priestly 
ministrations. The other brethren were to abide apart, to 
comfort him with their prayers and to keep secular folk 
who might visit the spot, from approaching the " secret 
bower" where God was communing with His servant. 2 

Now began that series of Divine manifestations which 
was to make Alvernia a holy mountain in the eyes of the 
Christian people. 

One day as Francis was standing by his cell under the 
beech tree and wondering at the curious conformation of the 
mountain which at its summit is split into great fissures by 

1 Bonizzo was cited as a special witness to the stigmata by John of 
Parma at the General Chapter of Genoa (cf. Eccleston, ed. Little, coll. 
xin. pp. 93-4). Eccleston does not say he was actually with Francis on 
Monte Alvernia, but we know that he was one of Francis companions in his 
last years. Eccleston tells us that Ruffino was on Monte Alvernia at the time 
of the stigmata (I.e.) ; Leo, Masseo, Angelo and Illuminato are named in the 
Fioretti, Delle sacre sante Stimate, in. Consid. Silvestro is mentioned in 
TJ Addio di san Francesco. St. Bonaventure (Leg. Maj. xin. 4) also mentions 
Illuminato. Vide infra, passim. 

2 Fioretti, Delle sacre sante stimatc, n. Consid. 

22 



338 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSISI 

some momentous cataclysm, Francis was rapt in prayer. 
" Then," says a chronicler, "it was revealed to him by God 
that these fissures so wonderful, were miraculously wrought 
in the hour of Christ s passion when as the Evangelist says, 
the rocks were rent asunder." 1 From that moment Alvernia 
was holy ground to Francis : it became to him a speaking 
witness to the Passion of his Lord. And with this intimation 
there came to him some dim understanding of the mystery 
in his soul : and thereat his soul grew more aflame with love 
of his Crucified Master : and from this time he became more 
insensible to the external world and more rapt in contempla 
tion. Oftentimes Brother Leo coming to visit him would find 
him in ecstasy lifted above the earth, his body yielded to the 
impulse of the spirit ; and then Leo s soul would overflow 
with affection and reverence and at times drawing nigh 
timidly he would kiss the feet of Francis, beseeching God, 
as he did so, to have mercy upon his own unworthiness and 
in spite thereof to give him a share in Francis grace. 

But one day when the feast of the Assumption drew near, 
Francis bade Leo go and stand at the door of the oratory of 
the brethren ; and himself going to a distance, he called to 
Leo who at once responded. Whereupon Francis went still 
further away and again called to Leo, and this time Leo did not 
hear the call. Then coming back, Francis told Leo that he 
proposed to abide during the approaching Lent of St. Michael, 
which begins the day after our Lady s feast, in a more secluded 
spot near where he had stood when Leo could notjhear his call. 
The spot chosen was on a ledge of rock which stood out from 
the body of the ground, divided from it by a deep chasm. On 
the other side the rock falls sheer down a hundred feet or 
more to the sloping ground. They bridged the chasm with 
a plank and constructed a wicker cell and then Francis gave 
Leo and the other brothers his instructions for the guarding 
of his retreat. None were to come nigh save Leo who was 
to bring him a portion of bread and water each day and to 
come again at the midnight hour for matins : but even Leo 
must not cross the bridge over the chasm unless Francis 

l ,Fioretti, loc. cit. 



THE STIGMATA 339 

answered his signal ; and the signal was these opening words 
of the matins-service : Domine labia mea aperies. And if 
Francis did not reply Leo must go away quickly and not 
cross the bridge. 1 

Alone on his rocky ledge, Francis now entered into that 
purgatory of the soul which precedes the more intimate 
unions of man with God. At times his spirit would be op 
pressed and the powers of evil would seem to be let loose 
to torment him even with bodily violence, testing the tenacity 
of his spirit. It was the ultimate temptation of the strong, 
when evil is no longer felt as a personal weakness but as an 
objective reality, the more terrifying because so foreign to 
one s own desire. Then it is that the soul most needs un 
wavering faith and trust in the reality of the heavenly good : 
to stand firm in such temptation is man s highest act of 
worship, the complete submission of himself to God. In 
such temptation the body suffers even with the spirit and 
the whole man is cast into the crucible. So was it now 
with Francis. Once when Leo came to him Francis held 
him in conversation, seeking comfort : "If the brethren did 
but know," he pathetically exclaimed, "how many and how 
grievous are the anguishes and afflictions which the devils work 
upon me, there is not one of them but would be moved with 
pity and tenderness towards me." : But alternating with 
combat and suffering, there came to Francis moments of clear 
vision when heaven opened to him its secret, and at times the 
very sweetness of the life eternal entered into his soul and 
filled him with ravishing joy. One day as he was meditating 
upon the joy of the Blessed and thirsting for a share in it, 
there appeared to him an angel of God in great splendour 
A spirit of music it must have been, for with a viol which he 
carried, he uttered music of such sweetness, that Francis 
lost all bodily sense. 3 

Nor must we forget to relate how in his solitude Francis 
was much comforted by the friendship of a falcon whose 

l Fioretti, loc. cit. 2 Spec. Perfect, [ed. Sabatier], cap. 99. 

3 Fioretti, loc. cit. A somewhat similar incident is related in II Celano, 
126. 

22* 



340 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

nest was near his cell. For the falcon attached itself to 
him, abiding near him in his prayer, and singing meanwhile 
its own song of praise : and at midnight when it was time 
for Francis to rise for matins, the bird would flutter against 
his cell until he arose. And for that falcon Francis had a 
great love. 1 

Meanwhile upon Brother Leo, the faithful keeper of his 
master s retreat, there fell a tender awe and fear, knowing as 
he did the trouble through which Francis was passing and 
divining some great heavenly favour at hand. One night 
when he came to the bridge and called aloud " Domine labia 
mea aperies," no answer came, and for once the fear in his 
soul made him disregard the injunction to go back and not 
pass the bridge. Crossing over to the cell, he found it empty 
and went on to a wooded spot where he thought Francis 
might be. There indeed Francis was. In the moonlight 
Leo saw him kneeling in prayer with face and arms uplifted 
towards heaven, and heard him repeating with fervour : 
" Who art Thou, my most sweet God ? Who am I, a most 
vile worm and Thy useless servant?" And Leo knew that 
he was a witness to some intimate colloquy between Francis 
and his Lord : but what the colloquy portended Leo could 
not understand. But looking on amazed, he saw a flame 
resting over the head of Francis who three times extended 
his hand towards it. And after awhile, which seemed to 
Leo a great age, the flame returned to heaven. Then in 
terror at his intrusion Leo began to move away as softly as 
he might. But Francis hearing his footsteps upon the 
leaves, called to him not to go away : whereat Leo was in 
such fear and shame that he wished the earth would open 
and swallow him. But chiefly he feared lest because of his 
disobedience Francis would relieve him of his attendance : 
and at that thought the heart of Leo became a great void. 
But Francis, divining his trouble and the love which had 
conquered his will to obey, rebuked him but gently and kept 
him by his side. Emboldened at such gracious tenderness, 

1 Fioretti, loc. cit. ; I Celano, 168 ; Tract, de Mirac. 25 ; Leg. Maj. 
vni. 10. 



THE STIGMATA 341 

Leo asked Francis to explain the meaning of that Divine 
visitation, and then he learned that the words he heard were 
the protest of Francis humility because our Lord Christ had 
asked of him so unworthy, three gifts. And the Lord had 
bidden him three times put his hand to his bosom : and each 
time Francis had found there a ball of fire, which he offered, 
at first not understanding the mystery ; but Christ had told 
him that these balls of fire were the virtues of poverty, 
chastity and obedience which were in the heart of Francis. 1 
Then when they had spoken of these things, Francis went 
with Leo to the oratory where Mass was said : there Francis 
cast himself upon the ground before the Altar and prayed that 
God would make known to him His will concerning the 
mystery which lay upon him. And when he had prayed he 
signed himself with the sign of the cross ; then wistfully bade 
Leo take the book of the Gospels from the altar and read the 
first passage upon which his eye alighted. 

The passage was one which relates how it behoved 
Christ to suffer. A second and third time Leo opened the 
book at Francis bidding, and each time the reading con 
cerned the passion of our Lord. Gently and with joy Francis 
submitted to what he believed was an indication of the 
Divine Will : by suffering he too must come into the King 
dom of God, even as it was with his Lord : and into his soul 
there came a great longing to share in the passion of Christ 
and to have in himself that divine love which impelled Christ 
to suffer for men. 2 

With this prayer in his heart Francis awakened one morn 
ing about the feast of the Holy Cross or as some say, on the 
very day of the Holy Cross. 3 One chronicler tells us that 

1 Fioretli, loc. cit. in. Consid. 

2 Fioretti, loc. cit. ; II Celano, 92, 93 ; Leg. Maj. xm. 2. 

3 S. Bonaventure (Leg. Maj. xni. 3) says: " Quodammanc circa festuin Ex- 
altationis sanctcc, crucis ". The Chron. xxiv. Gen. (Anal. Franc, in. p. 30) : 
" Circa festum Exalt ationis sanctce crucis vel ut in quodani revelations divina, in 
eodemfesto ". This revelation is evidently that mentioned in the Instrumen- 
tum de Stigmatibus compiled by Brother Philip, Provincial of Tuscany, by com 
mand of the Minister-General, in 1283. Vide Anal. Franc, in. p. 374 ; and pp. 
641 seq. The Fioretti says : " Viene il di seguenete, cioeil di della santissima 
Croce ". Celano gives no indication of the day. 



342 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSISI 

on the previous day whilst Francis was praying in his cell, 
an angel had appeared to him and had bidden him prepare 
himself to suffer patiently what God was about to work in 
him ; and Francis had replied that he was willing to receive 
patiently whatever it would please his Lord to do unto him. 1 
But whether the angel appeared to his bodily sense or made 
his presence felt by the inner understanding, is not said. Yet 
this we may well believe that to the soul of Francis there 
came some Divine intimation of that which was now to 
happen to him. Francis, then, was kneeling at his morning 
prayer on this day of days when he saw in vision a strange 
form coming towards him, whereat he was much terrified. 2 
But as this strange thing came near and stood on a stone 
above him he saw one who was a man and yet a Seraph. 
His arms were extended and his feet conjoined, and his body 
was fastened to a cross. Two wings were raised above his 
head, two were extended as in flight and two covered the 
body. 3 But the face was beauteous beyond all earthly 
beauty ; and yet it was the face of suffering. And at that 
Francis was filled with great joy because of the beauty of 
that face ; and then with exceeding pity and sorrow because 
of the pain and suffering which was there. 4 Suddenly in a 
moment of great agony the Seraph smote him as it were in 
body and soul, so that Francis was in great fear ; and yet 
again the Seraph spoke to him as a friend making clear 
many things which hitherto had been hidden from him : as 
he afterwards told his companions. 5 And then after a 
moment which seemed an age, the vision disappeared. 

When Francis came to himself, his first thought was one 
of perplexity as to what this vision could mean ; for he knew 
that no heavenly spirit can suffer mortal pain. In this per- 

1 Fioretti, loc. cit. 

2 Leg. Maj. xin. 3 ; Eccleston [ed. Little], col. xiii, p. 93. 

3 Compare the description of the Seraphim in Isaias vi. 2. 

4 1 Celano, II, in. 94 ; Celano, de Miraculis, n. 4 ; Leg. Maj. loc. cit. ; 
Fioretti, loc. cit. 

Of. Eccleston [ed. Little], xiii, p. 93. 

6 Fioretti, loc. cit. : " Disparendo dunque questa visione mirabile dopo 
grande spazio ". 



THE STIGMATA 343 

plexity of mind he rose from his knees and stood pondering 
amazedly : whilst still in his soul was the mingled sorrow 
and joy of the vision. As he stood thus, the meaning was 
made clear : for in the body of Francis appeared the marks of 
the crucified Seraph : in his hands and feet were the scars of 
wounds and in the scars were the impressions of nails, so 
formed that they might be taken for the nails of the cross ; the 
round heads black in appearance, protruding in the palms of 
the hands and on the insteps of the feet ; whilst on the back 
of the hands and on the soles of feet were the bended points 
of the nails : and his right side was as though pierced by a 
lance. 1 The Seraph of the vision was the spirit of the Crucified 
suffering through love, which now had taken entire possession 
of God s dear poor one ; 2 of which possession the external 
marks were the sign and seal. 

Now at this happening Francis was alone in his solitude : 
not even Leo being present ; 3 and at first he thought never 
to reveal to any man this wonderful thing which had come to 

1 Celano, loc. cit. ; Leg. Maj. loc. cit. ; Fioretti, loc. cit. For description of 
the stigmata see also the letter of Brother Elias to Gregory of Naples written 
to announce the death of St. Francis (Boehmer, Analekten, p. 90). See also 
the attestations of Gregory IX in his letters " Nonminus dolentes " and " Cum 
sceculi vanitate " in Sbaralea, Bull. i. p. 213 seq. 

2 S. Bonaventure, ut supra, says it was Christ sub sped Seraph who ap 
peared to Francis. Gelano in Legenda Prima (loc. cit.) speaks rather vaguely ; 
" vidit in visione Dei virum unum quasi seraphim sex alas habentem," but in the 
Tractatus de Miraculis he says more positively: "vidit in visione Seraph in 
cruce positwn ". It is curious to note the difference in treatment of the story of 
the stigmata between the earliest paintings and those of Giotto and his suc 
cessors. In the former the saint is alone, standing up amid trees and flowers 
indicative of a wood ; in the latter, the saint is generally depicted kneeling, 
with Brother Leo near at hand, and upon rocky ground. It is, however, to be 
noted that the marks of the stigmata, as Celano expressly says, appeared after 
the vision, when Francis had risen up and whilst he was pondering on the 
significance of what he had seen. Another difference is that in the earliest 
paintings the Seraph has the conventional face of a Seraph, whereas in the 
later paintings, it is the face of our Lord. It is the difference between Celano 
and S. Bonaventure. Cf. Matrod, Deux Eniaux Franciscains an Louvre. 

Had Leo been present Celano would surely have adduced him as a wit 
ness to so wonderful an event. Moreover, S. Bonaventure (Leg. Maj. xni. 4) 
implies that none of the saint s familiar companions (socii familiares) knew 
of what had happened. 



344 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

him : even as every true man will jealously hide the most 
precious gift to his heart, not speaking of it even to his friends. 
And then again he was in doubt for that it was impossible al 
together to hide this manifest sign from those who were most 
with him ; and because it was thus manifest, would he be 
setting himself against the Will of God and taking wholly to 
himself what God had meant perhaps for a sign and comfort 
to others ? Thus he knew not whether he should speak or 
remain silent. But at length he called to him his companions 
and in general terms set this question to them, whether one 
should reveal or hide a favour which God had granted him. 
Whereupon Illuminate saw that Francis spoke as one much 
amazed, and divined that something extraordinary had 
happened : so he replied : " Brother, thou knowest that not 
for thyself alone are the heavenly secrets revealed to thee, 
but for others also. Therefore is it to be feared that if thou 
dost hide what thou hast received for the profit of many, thou 
wilt be judged guilty of the hidden talent ". l Then shyly and 
as by constraint Francis told the brothers of the vision and 
the stigmata ; adding that the Seraph had told him many 
things of which he could not speak. Yet he kept hidden from 
their sight the marks in his body, covering his hands and 
feet with his tunic. Only to Leo did he willingly bare his 
wounds, when because of the pain and the bleeding he must 
needs have them bound with bandages. 2 

But to Buffino the contemplative, Francis spoke intim 
ately of some of the things that had been revealed to him 
concerning the Order, in the moment of the vision ; namely, 
that the life and profession of the Friars Minor should never 
fail even to the day of judgment ; also that no one who 
maliciously persecuted the Order would have a long life ; that 
no evil person wishing to live wickedly, could long remain in 
the Order; and that whosoever loved the Order from his 
heart, however great a sinner he might be, should at last find 
mercy. 3 

1 Leg. Maj. xni. 4 ; Fioretti, loc. cit. 

z Fiorctti t loc. cit. ; Chron. xxiv. Gen. in Anal. Franc. HI. p. 68. 
3 Spec. Perfect, [ed. Sabatier], cap. 79. Eccleston, loc. cit. Of. Fioretti, 
in. Consid., where the promises are amplified and include this, that the breth- 



THE STIGMATA 345 

Now seeing how God had dealt with him, Francis heart 
was filled with unutterable gratitude ; and even the very ground 
became sacred and precious to him. And the remembrance of 
that smiting by the Seraph filled him always with renewed 
wonder : so had the angel dealt with the patriarch Jacob 
of old, smiting him into submission to His will. Then Fran 
cis, because he was unable to perform the act himself on 
account of his wounds, bade Kuffino consecrate the stone 
upon which the Seraph had stood, even as Jacob had con 
secrated the stone of his vision, washing it and anointing it 
with oil : l and from that day that stone has been held sacred 
by all the generations of the brethren. 2 

But because his heart was full, he must needs utter in 
words what his soul felt, constrained by a poet s need : and 
yet because of the strangeness of this mystery and the fear 
which was still upon him, his tongue was held and he could 
speak but haltingly in borrowed words. So taking parch 
ment and pen he wrote this psalm, which a later generation 
of men styled " The Praise of the Most High God " : though 
as you will see, it had more fittingly been styled, " The 
Praise of the Crucified": 

Thou art the Holy Lord God ; Thou art God of gods, Who alone 

workest marvels. 
Thou art strong, Thou art great, Thou art most high ; Thou art 

almighty, Thou holy Father, King of heaven and earth. 
Thou art threefold and one ; Lord God of gods. 
Thou art good, every good, the highest good ; the Lord God, living 

and true. 

Thou art love, charity ; Thou art wisdom ; Thou art humility. 
Thou art patience ; Thou, fortitude and prudence. 
Thou art security, Thou art rest ; Thou art joy and gladness. 

ren who observed the Rule perfectly, will at their death enter into eternal life 
without passing through purgatory. 

1 Eccleston, loc. cit. Later writers attribute this act to Leo (cf. Anal. 
Franc, m. p. 67) but Eccleston had the story from Peter of Tewkesbury who 
had it from the lips of Leo himself. 

2 It is encased in a grille in the Chapel of the Stigmata : and on it is this 
inscription : " Hie signasti Domine, servum tuum Franciscum ". Twice a day 
after matins and vespers the friars proceed to the chapel in solemn procession 
and venerate this sacred spot. 



346 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

Thou art justice and temperance ; Thou art all our wealth and 

plenty. 
Thou art beauty, Thou art gentleness ; Thou art the protector ; 

Thou art the keeper and the defender. 
Thou art our refuge and strength ; Thou art our faith, hope, and 

charity. 

Thou art our great sweetness ; Thou art our eternal life. 
Infinite Goodness, great and wonderful Lord God Almighty : loving 

and merciful Saviour. 1 

Thus in the strength of his joy, Francis sang his Magnificat. 
It has often been said that those who are nearest to God, 
are nearest to the hearts of their fellow-men : and of this we 
have an instance in Francis in this day of his exaltation. For 
whilst he was being thus fashioned in the likeness of his Lord 
and enduring both the pain and the sweetness of the fashion 
ing, Brother Leo, that faithful friend and servitor, was passing 
through a trial of his own, hard to endure. Out of his very 
familiarity with Francis had come his trial. He had witnessed 
the agony through which the master he worshipped, was pass 
ing to his glory ; he had caught some glimpse of life of the 
elect. And then there had come upon him this doubt : how 
could he, so unworthy and so mean, stand beside this holy 
one of God or ever hope to attain to the eternal life ? And 
Leo s heart was heavy almost to despair. At one moment he 
would determine to cast himself upon the pity of Francis ; 
but again he drew back, fearing with inconsequent fear lest 
Francis should reject him ; and then he were lost indeed. Then 
in his agony of soul he thought that if only Francis would 
write with his own hand some words of Holy Scripture which 

1 Opusciila S. Franc. (Quaracchi), p. 124; Boehmer, Analekten, p. 66; 
Tlie Seraphic Keepsake, by Reginald Balfour, p. 54. The original autograph is 
preserved in the sacristy of the Sagro Convento, Assisi. On one side of the 
sheet are written the Praises; on the other the Blessing of St. Francis given 
to Brother Leo (vide infra). Of. Fr. Paschal Robinson, Writings of St. 
Francis, pp. 146-9. 

Mr. Balfour (loc. cit. p. 52) has pointed out the inadequacy of the con 
ventional title given to the Praises. He says: "This title is misleading, 
because in the Praise of God Most High, Saint Francis does not dwell with 
any special emphasis upon that aspect of Almighty God, which humanity 
sums up in the word Creator . . . . Saint Francis addresses ... in a word, 
the loving and merciful Saviour ". 



THE STIGMATA 347 

had come to Leo as a promise of day, and give him the writ 
ing, it would be to him a token of God s favour and something 
to hold to in his desolation. And yet even this he feared to 
ask : dreading the awful climax of a refusal But in this 
hour of his own joy, when Francis was writing his Praises of 
the Crucified Saviour, there came to his receptive heart an 
understanding of the soul of Leo abiding mutely beside him. 
And when he had written those Praises, turning the parch 
ment over, he inscribed these words of Holy Writ : 

The Lord bless thee and keep thee. 

The Lord show His face to thee and have mercy upon thee. 

The Lord turn His countenance to thee and give thee peace. 1 

And beneath these words and to give them a personal applica 
tion Francis wrote : 

Brother Leo may our Lord bless thee. 

And then not content till he had made this message complete, 
he drew beneath the blessing the rude figure of a head and 
upon this, yet so drawn as to pass through the letters of Leo s 
name, he drew the sign Thau. 

Then Francis gave the parchment to the suffering Leo, 
saying : " Take this sheet and carefully keep it by thee till the 
day of thy death ". And to his amazement Leo saw written 
there the very words he had desired to be written ; and there 
too he saw himself marked with the sign of the elect. And 
at that moment the dread of despair vanished from his soul ; 
nor did it ever return. 2 

1 Numbers vi. 24-6. The translation is according to the Vulgate, as was 
the Latin text inscribed by Francis. 

2 II Celano, II, xx. 49 ; Leg. Maj. xi. 9 ; Fioretti, loc. cit. n. Consid. The 
Fioretti puts the temptation of Brother Leo before the impressing of the stig 
mata ; but Gelano clearly states that the blessing was written at the same 
time as the Praises. Now we know from Leo s own testimony that the 
Praises were written " after the vision and speech lie had of the Seraph and the 
impression in his body of the stigmata of Christ ". So Leo tells us in the note 
he added to this very parchment which Francis gave him (vide note on pre 
ceding page). 

The character of Leo s temptation which, as all the chroniclers say, was 
" of the spirit and not of the flesh" "71071 carnis sed spiritus" is indicated 
by the words of the blessing and the sign than upon the head. Leo s descrip 
tion: " signum thau cum capite " written on the same sheet is significant of 



348 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

Francis abode on Monte Alvernia until after St. Michael s 
feast. 1 On the day of his departure the lord Orlando came 
from his castle of Chiusi to bid him farewell ; and an ass 
being brought, Francis was placed upon it ; and with Brother 
Leo in attendance and a peasant, the owner of the ass, he 
began his journey back to the Porziuncola. But before 
starting Francis called to him his companions of these un 
forgettable days and bade them abide in charity and be 
constant in prayer and have a care of this holy mountain. 
Then whilst the brethren were weeping because of his parting 
and the tenderness of his words, Francis and Leo and the 
peasant took the road which goes by Monte Acuto and down 
the steep ways into Borgo San Sepolcro. 

On the journey Francis became lost in prayer to all visible 
things, and even as they passed through Borgo San Sepolcro 
he did not hear the acclamation of the townsmen nor heed 
the town itself. 

In the evening they came to the hermitage of Monte 
Casale up in the mountains above the town, where Francis 
pityingly gave health and peace to an epileptic brother : and 
at Monte Casale he rested : for this place is fashioned for joy 
and contentment, so paradisal is its beauty. But after a few 
days he passed on to Citta di Castello in the plain, where 
the people received him with delight and brought to him 
their sick to be cured. Here he remained many days at the 
prayer of the people ; and when he again took up his journey 
the first snows were falling on the mountains over which he 
must pass on his way to the Porziuncola. That night they 
were storm-bound in the hills and could not proceed : and at 
this the owner of the ass on which Francis rode not he who 
came from Alvernia, but another murmured and was in sore 
temper because of the cold. But Francis took his hand and 

its prophetic interpretation. Cf. Ezechiel ix. 6; of. R. Balfour, loc. cit. p. 
66 sec[. Mr. Montgomery Carmichael (La Benedizione di san Francesco) argues 
that the sign manual represents a cross on Monte Alvernia : but this imagina 
tive supposition is in contradiction to Leo s own description and to the known 
custom Francis had of signing his letters with the sign than. Cf . Celano, Tract, 
de Mirac. 11. 3 ; cf . Edouard d Alencon, La Benediction de St. Francois. 
1 Leg. Maj. xm. 5. 



THE STIGMATA 349 

at the touch the cold seemed to vanish from the man s body 
and he passed the night without discomfort amidst the rocks. 1 

Next day they journeyed on and came to the Porziun- 
cola : and to the eyes of Leo it seemed as they drew nigh 
this sacred place, that a bright cross preceded them, and on 
the cross was the figure of the Crucified : and it went before 
them until they entered the enclosure. 2 

Thus Francis came home, himself little heeding the voices 
of men : but all the countryside were telling the marvel which 
had happened to him : and in the soul of Leo there was a 
great joy. 

1 Leg. Maj. xm. 7 ; Fioretti, loc. cit. iv. Consid. 

2 For this journey our chief authority is the Fioretti, loc. cit. All the 
country between Alvernia and Assisi, through which Francis passed, is full of 
local traditions handed down by the people through the centuries. 



CHAPTEK III. 
TOWARDS EVENING. 

IT is a marvellous thing that on his return from Alvernia, 
Francis seemed to glow with new energy in spite of the fact 
that his body was now almost wholly broken with sickness 
and pain ; for to the gastric troubles and consequent debility 
which had increased much since his journey to the East, 
there was now added the pain and weakness of the stigmata. 
A mere touch made his wounds throb with pain, 1 and there 
were frequent bleedings which robbed him of his poor 
physical strength. 2 Because of the wounds in his feet and 
the fleshy nails, he could not walk except with acute suffer 
ing. 3 And yet in spirit he was as one whose youth is 
renewed. 

Incredible as it might seem, hardly had he returned to 
the Porziuncola than he set out on an evangelizing tour, 
riding on an ass. 4 The brethren pityingly besought him to 
rest and to have a care of his body and to submit himself 
to medical treatment ; but he gaily brushed aside their 
anxieties: where would be his knightly honour, if bearing 
the marks of Christ s passion, he sought to avoid the pain ? 
He had taken his Master s cup, and he must needs drink it 
that he might fulfil in himself the sufferings of Christ which 
yet were lacking in him. 

The truth is, Francis knew that his days on earth were 
drawing near their end, and he was like a bride solicitous 
only to prepare the home against the corning of him whom 
her soul worships. Why waste the time in useless cares ? 

1 II Celano, 138 ; Tract, de Miraculis, 4 ; Leg. Maj. xm. 8. 
2 1 Celano, 95 ; II Celano, 136. Tract, de Miraculis, 4. 
*ibid. 4 1 Celano, 98. 

360 



TOWAEDS EVENING 851 

The brethren, too, knew that his days were numbered. 
They had but to look upon his weakened body : and then 
there was a mysterious warning which had come to Brother 
Elias one night when he and Francis were stopping at 
Foligno. In his dream Elias had seen a venerable priest 
clothed in white garments, who bade him arise and tell 
Francis that in two years time he would go the way of all 
flesh at the call of the Lord. 1 When Francis heard the 
message, his soul bounded with joy and all his being turned 
eagerly to that call of the Lord : but the brethren in their 
love for him and in their self-pity, were made only the more 
anxious to tend him with all services, and, if it might be, to 
ward off the approaching day. 

And shortly a new aggravation of illness forced him to 
submit somewhat to their solicitations. His malady brought 
on a trouble of the eyes, so that he could hardly endure the 
light ; and he was altogether in great pain. 2 Then did Brother 
Elias become more importunate, bidding him as his guardian 
to take medical advice. But Elias did more : he sent word 
to Cardinal Ugolino, knowing well how Francis held him in 
great reverence. 

It was now early summer ; and the cardinal was with the 
papal court at Rieti. 3 At the court was a physician of great 
skill. The cardinal, therefore, sent an urgent message to 
Francis to come and be treated at Rieti. Francis submitted ; 
and arrangements were made to carry him thither by easy 
stages. 4 

Now this journey was to be memorable both for what 
happened at its beginning and towards its end ; but chiefly 
for what happened at the beginning. 

On the first day Francis journeyed only as far as the con 
vent of San Damiano, less than an hour s slow ride from the 
Porziuncola : for he much desired to visit Sister Clare both 

1 1 Celano, 109 ; Spec. Perfect, [ed. Sab.], cap. 121. 

2 Celano, 98. 

3 Honorius III had been compelled by a rising of the Romans to quit Rome 
at the end of April. After a short stay at Tivoli, he came with his court to 
Rieti and remained there until the end of 1226. 

4 1 Celano, 99 ; Fioretti, xvm. 



352 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

for his own soul s comfort and for hers. In these days of his 
peace when the hand of the Lord lay so mightily, yet so sweetly, 
upon him, he turned to Clare for understanding sympathy as 
to no one else. None other was there in all the earth who 
understood so well as she, this mystery which had come to 
him, and what his own thought and desire must be concerning 
it. For to her too in the walled garden of her heart, Christ 
had revealed Himself : and she knew, and knowing, wor 
shipped. No word of hers would tarnish the bloom upon this 
"secret of the King". With her therefore Francis could 
speak as to none other. And because she knew him so well, 
her woman s pity for his sufferings never made her less a 
companion to him in his determination to suffer even to the 
uttermost what pain should be sent him, that so he might 
the more fully probe the love which made Christ his Lord 
suffer. Hence when others who understood him less though 
they loved him well, claimed the guardianship of his body, he 
turned once more to Clare for the comfort of his spirit. 

It was to be but a passing visit and the next day would 
see the travellers again on the road. But that night Francis be 
came much worse and it was soon evident that he could travel 
no further for the present. Then Clare, divining Francis 
wish, had a hut built for him in the convent garden, a hut of 
wattles such as he had at the Porziuncola : and thither Francis 
was carried in the loving care of Angelo Tancredi, Kuffino, 
Leo and Masseo ; l Clare s vigilant sympathy hovering over 
them all. For between all these first disciples of Poverty 
there was a spirit of comradeship in which few of the later 
generation could share: and doubtless Clare was thankful 
that in these days of pain Francis should be tended by the 
companions of those first joyous years. 

The suffering grew intense and to the agony of nerve and 
limb was added the dread loss of sight. 

To increase his discomfort the hut was over-run with mice. 
Now ordinarily Francis would not have minded this much, 
because of his love of all creatures, even the meanest. But 

1 1 Celano, 102. Celano does not give their names, but his description of 
them leaves no doubt. 



TOWAEDS EVENING 353 

in his blindness and pain their importunate intrusions set all 
his nerves ajar : and for once he felt a certain pity for him 
self and grew fearful lest his patience should fail. In this 
new need he turned to the Lord and besought Him to come 
to his aid. Hardly had he uttered the cry when to his spirit 
there came the responding question : " Tell me, brother, if 
anyone should give thee in return for thy infirmities and 
sufferings, a treasure so vast and precious that the whole 
earth by comparison would be as nothing to it, wouldst thou 
not greatly rejoice? " Francis answered musingly : " Great 
indeed, Lord, would be this treasure and very precious and 
exceedingly wonderful and desirable". The voice replied, 
" Then, brother, be glad and make merry in thine infirmities 
and sufferings ; and for the rest, thou mayest be assured of 
My Kingdom, even as if thou wert already there ". 

Now as when on a dreary journey suddenly one comes 
upon an entrancing scene of loveliness and forgets in a 
moment the dragging weariness and leaps with a new under 
standing and joy of life, so now it was with Francis. The 
dread veil of despondency lifted and he felt only the treasure of 
life which the earth held, scintillating with the mystic promise 
of the fuller life to come. And all his being throbbed with the 
pleasure of it and his heart was full of gratitude for the fair 
world which promised yet a fairer. And through the remain 
ing hours of the night his whole being was eager with 
worship, and he could have kissed the earth and the sky 
for the promise they had brought him. So he passed the 
night. 

But as soon as day broke Francis arose and called his 
companions, for he could not rest with his joy unshared. 
" My brothers," he exclaimed, " if the emperor promised his 
kingdom to one of his liege-men, should not that man be very 
glad ? And if he gave him his whole empire, should he not 
yet even more rejoice ? Surely then ought I to be glad of my 
infirmities and sufferings, and be comforted in our Lord and 
for ever give thanks to God the Father and to His only Son 
our Lord Jesus Christ and to the Holy Spirit, because of this 
so great favour He has done to me ; for he has deigned to 

23 



354 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSISI 

assure me, His unworthy servant whilst yet I live in the flesh, 
of the possession of His Kingdom. Wherefore to the praise 
of the Lord and for our own comfort and for the edification 
of our neighbour, I will make a new hymn concerning those 
creatures of the Lord which minister to our daily need and 
without whom we could not live." 

So saying, Francis sat down and pondered : then lifting 
his voice he uttered in the Italian tongue this song : 

Most high omnipotent, good Lord, 

Thine are praise, glory and honour and all benediction, 
To Thee alone, Most High, do they belong : 

And no man is there, worthy Thee to Name. 
Praise be to Thee, my Lord, with all Thy creatures, 

Chiefest of all, Sir Brother Sun 
Who is our day, through whom Thou givest light : 

Beautiful is he ; radiant, with great splendour : 
Of Thee, Most High, he is a true revealer. 

Praise be to Thee my Lord, for Sister Moon and for the stars ; 
In heaven hast thou formed them, bright, precious and fair. 

Praise be to Thee my Lord, for Brother Wind, and for the 

air and for the cloud, for clear sky and all weathers, 
By which Thou givest nourishment to all Thy creatures. 

Praise be to Thee my Lord, for Sister Water ; she 
Most useful is, and humble, precious and pure. 

Praise be to Thee my Lord, for Brother Fire ; by whom 
Thou lightest up the night : 

And fair is he and merry, mighty and strong. 
Praise be to Thee, my Lord, for our Sister, Mother Earth, 

The which sustains and keeps us : 
She brings forth diverse fruits, the many-hued flowers and grass. 

O Creatures all ! praise and bless my Lord, and grateful be, 
And serve Him with deep humility. 

Having uttered his hymn, Francis caused it to be written 
down, entitling it " The Canticle of Brother Sun ". And he 
set it to a melody, and straightway taught the brethren to 
sing it. 1 

i Of. Spec. Perfect, [ed. Sab.], cap. 100, 118, and 119 ; II Celano, 213. 

The Canticle of the Sun is given in Spec. Perfect, cap. 120; and in 
Conformit. lib. n. fruct. xi. ii. It also exists in many MSS. Of. Sabatier, 
Spec. Perfect., Etude Speciale du Chap. 120, pp. 277-91; Fr. Paschal 



TOWAKDS EVENING 355 

Thus out of that night of pain did Francis issue forth the 
singer of a new song, one of those songs of the soul s awaken 
ing which the world treasures with material instinct : for 
they are the joyous cry of an attained life attained within 
the soul of the singer which the world s heart has long 
desired to see and the vision of which will never again be 
wholly lost. Therefore are they taken to the heart of the 
world as the break of day is taken to the heart of the patient 
earth : for they are light, and warmth, and colour, all that 
makes life free and glad. 

The " Canticle of Brother Sun " is a song of the kin 
ship of all God s creatures and of God s Fatherhood of them 
all, and of the liberty which the heart of man finds in the 
vision of this truth. That is the palpitating cry which breaks 
out in its halting cadence and rugged line. It is the glad an 
nouncement of life where men had seen but counterfeit or 
negation. Those who had sang of religion before him had be 
moaned the tyranny of the sense-world and had seen freedom 
of soul only in the life beyond the grave : pathetically they 
bewailed their exile here on earth ; joyous only when they 
could escape in faith and hope from the earth on which they 
were born. But to Francis, mother earth and the sky 
above and all the things which God has made were insistent 
pledges of the life eternal, tokens of the Divine Life which 
creates both present and future : and he knew no other way 
of immersing his own being in the Eternal Sea than by im 
mersion in the sea of life around him; only this was he 
careful of, to keep his soul pure from selfish desire and to 
abide in the faith of Christ His Lord ; believing that only so 
would the created world give up to him its secret. 

And now with his faith in God so secure and all selfish 
ness utterly banished in his union with his God, his heart 
and mind were free and all his being confessed with joyous 
clear confession his faith in the visible world. That was the 
liberty into which Francis had come and which he sang in his 
song. How it sent a thrill through the heart of Christendom 

Kobinson, The Writings of St. Francis, pp. 150-3 ; Boehmer, Analekten, 
p. Ixiii. 

23* 



356 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

and was one of the beginnings of a new religious sense and 
of a new secular art, you may read elsewhere ; x and also how 
it was one of the beginnings of that Italian speech which 
Dante Alighieri moulded into such perfect melody. 2 For in 
the uttering of this song Francis used neither the Latin of the 
clerk nor the language of the Proven9al troubadour, as in the 
songs he had hitherto sung, but with the instinct of the true 
poet he strung his verse to the melody of his own people s 
tongue. It was but an untutored speech, the speech of his 
people, unrecognized by the scholar save as a menial in the 
house. Yet could no other speech have borne the burden of his 
song : for no true poet yet has sung truly in an alien tongue 
or in any other save that of his own blood. 

Was Clare present when Francis composed his hymn ? In 
deed it may well be that the world owes this song in part to 
her inspiring sympathy : for never had Francis been more 
truly himself than in these days at San Damiano. He had 
become again the joyous troubadour of the Lord, even as he 
had been in the days before his great trial : but just as the 
early beauty will sometimes reappear in the countenance of 
one who has gone through years of suffering, ennobled and 
spiritually transfigured ; or as the golden dawn is fulfilled in 
the mellow brilliance of evening sunlight ; so was it with 
Francis in this rejuvenation of his spirit. More and more 
ardent he grew to conquer the world by love and poetry, believ 
ing that if men could but be brought to gaze upon the beauty 
of God and His works, they would be impelled to love and 
serve Him. In his recovered freedom all the world was again 
transfigured in the mystic light of his glowing idealism. 

An incident now happened which confirmed him in this 
glad outlook. Whilst he was still at San Damiano, a long- 
smouldering feud burst into flame between the municipality 
of Assisi and the bishop. The bishop excommunicated the 

J Cf. E. Gebhart, L ltalie Mystique, pp. 282-3; ibid. pp. 83-4; Miintz, 
Hist, de Vart pendant la Renaissance : Les Primitifs ; Thode, St. Frangois 
dAssise et VArt Italien. 

2 Of. Ozanam, Les Po&tes Franciscains, p. 82 ; Matthew Arnold, Essays in 
Criticism, p. 243 ; Monaci, Crestomazia italiana dei primi secoli, fasc. i. pp. 
29-31. 



TOWAKDS EVENING 357 

magistrates, and these forbade the citizens to have any busi 
ness relations with the bishop s court either for buying or sell 
ing. When the news reached the ears of Francis he sent for 
Brother Pacifico, the poet and singer, and for others of the 
brethren. One of them he bade go and summon the magis 
trates to the bishop s palace, and they out of reverence at 
once complied with the request. On their arrival they were 
met by Pacifico and his companions and by the bishop s court. 
Then, following out the injunction of Francis, the brethren 
sang the "Canticle of Brother Sun," as Francis had taught 
them ; but with this additional stanza, composed for the oc 
casion : 

Praise be to Thee my Lord for those who pardon grant for love of 

Thee, 

And weakness bear and buffetings : 
Blessed are they who in peace abide, 
For by Thee Most High, they shall be crowned. 

As the brethren sang, the bishop and the magistrates felt 
themselves strangely moved : into the misty, heated world of 
their petty rivalries and recriminations had come this song of 
Francis as a gentle believing spirit, and before it they grew 
ashamed and silent ; and then they became humble and re 
pentant ; and finally as the song ended, their hearts leaped to 
better things and they wept in their humiliation. Without 
argument or bargaining they held out to each other the hand 
of peace and parted in friendship. 1 

Francis was happy when the brethren returned and told 
what had happened. In his joy he planned to send Brother 
Pacifico and his fellow-singers on tour through the world. 
They were to go from place to place preaching and singing the 
praises of the Lord. First a brother, one who had the gift 
of words, was to preach and at the conclusion of the sermon 
the others were to sing this song of God s creatures: and 
when they had sung they were to say to the people : " We 
are God s jongleurs ; and for that we have sung to you, we 
ask a reward : and our reward will be that you all abide in 
sincere penitence ". 2 

1 Spec. Perfect, [ed. Sabatier], cap. 101. 2 ibid. cap. 100. 



358 LIFE OF ST. FRANCIS OF ASSISI 

It was six weeks or more before Francis could continue 
his journey to Eieti. 1 Perhaps in the heart of Clare there 
was a foreboding that this was to be his last visit to San 
Damiano. His going would leave a void in her daily life, for 
all these weeks she had ministered watchfully both for the 
comfort of his soul and the alleviation of his bodily suffer 
ing, 2 yet would she rejoice, understanding the joy which had 
come to him and that it would remain. In the intimacy of 
these days she had learned much that would stand her in 
good stead in the days to come when the defence of Francis 
ideals was to be committed into her brave hands. 

So Francis went on his way broken in body but greatly 
uplifted in spirit. By slow stages they had him borne over 
the road he knew so well. At length they came to the wooded 
hills that lie out in the plain near to Bieti ; and once again 
Francis was too ill to be carried further. So the brethren 
stopped at the church of San Fabiano where the priest offered 
the shelter of his house. And here happened that other in 
cident which was to make this journey notable. 

The priest was very poor : his chief source of income was 
a small vineyard which in the best years produced twelve 
measures of wine : and the vineyard adjoined the house. 
Now when it became known that Francis had arrived at the 
house of the priest of San Fabiano, all manner of people, 
cardinals and bishops and citizens, went out to do him rever 
ence and for some days the priest s house was as a shrine of 
pilgrimage. But alas for the vineyard ! With no considera 
tion for the priest s poverty, the pilgrims helped themselves 
to his fat grapes, and in a few days the vines were bare of 
their best. In despair the priest bewailed his prospect of 
hungry days ahead and began to regret his hospitality. 

1 There are various readings in the MSS. of the Spec. Perfect, regarding 
the length of Francis stay. Some say 60 days ; others 50. Of. Spec. Perfect. 
[ed. Sabatier], p. 195 seq. The Conformit. says 40 days. One MS. published 
in Miscellanea Franc, vi. p. 47 seq. has " ultra spatium 4 dierum ; " but as M. 
Sabatier has pointed out (Zofc. cit.) the expression is vague and unlikely. Prob 
ably it is a copyist s error for " ultra spatium 40 dierum ". 

2 A pair of sandals which Clare made to relieve the pain of his stigmatized 
feet are still preserved at San Damiano. 



TOWAEDS EVENING 359 

Francis, made aware of the havoc caused by his presence, 
pitied the poor priest and asked that he would come to him. 
" Be not disturbed, signore," he exclaimed confidently when 
the priest came ; " we cannot alter things now, but we can 
trust in the Lord to make good this loss which you have 
suffered on my account. Tell me how many measures of wine 
you get when the year is at its best ". The priest replied that 
twelve measures was his best output. "Then be not sad," 
said Francis, "and utter no further words of complaint: if 
you get less than twenty measures this year I will make good 
that quantity." And indeed when a few weeks later the time 
for pressing the grapes came, the priest to his joy got twenty 
measures of good wine. 1 

Francis coming to Eieti was in fact a Palm-Sunday tri 
umph. The rumour of the stigmata had preceded him : he 
was "the saint," whom all hastened to honour and revere. 
One man whose cattle had been struck by some disease, came 
to the brethren and besought them to give him the water in 
which Francis washed his hands and feet, and returning home 
he sprinkled the cattle with the water and they recovered. 2 

In the city Francis was lodged in the bishop s palace : and 
hither the sick were brought to him that he might heal them 
by his prayers and blessing. One of these was a canon, a 
worldly cleric crippled as the result of evil living. With piteous 
tears he clamoured to be signed with the sign of the cross. 
Francis acceded to his request but with this sharp rebuke : 
" You have lived according to the desires of the flesh and not 
according to the judgments of God: how then shall I sign 
you with the cross ? But I sign you in the name of Christ : 
yet know that greater evils will befall you if you return to 
your vomit : for on account of the sin of ingratitude things 
worse than the first come upon a man." The canon was 

1 Spec. Perfect, [ed. Sabatier], cap. 104 ; Fioretti, xvm. A new ohurch 
marked the scene of this miracle a few years later. It was consecrated by 
Gregory IX. It then became known by the title of S. Maria della Foresta. 
A house for the friars was built adjoining it. Tke house and church have of 
late years been temporarily closed owing, I was told, to lack of alms for their 
support. 

a Leg. Maj. xm. 6 ; Celano, Tract, de Mirac. 18. 



360 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSISI 

cured : but unhappily went back to his evil ways, and shortly 
was killed by a falling roof whilst rioting in the house of some 
friends. 1 

Meanwhile Francis was suffering greatly. Yet amidst his 
bodily agonies he continued to find an absorbing sweetness 
in meditating upon the beauty of God in His creation. All 
the creation seemed to sing of the glory of its Creator to his 
pain-racked senses : and this is the more wonderful when we 
remember how pain is apt to turn all sensible comfort into 
bitterness. One day, when he was suffering more than usual 
in eyes and head, he had a great desire to hear the viol. One 
of the brothers attending him, had been a violist in the world. 
Francis called for him and said : " Brother, the children of 
the world do not understand divine sacraments : and musical 
instruments which in former times were set apart for the 
praise of God, man s wantonness has converted to the mere 
delight of the ear. Now I would have you go secretly and 
borrow a viol and bring comfort with some honest melody 
to brother Body who is so full of pains ". But the brother 
had not Francis unworldliness. He protested that people 
might think he was given to levity if he asked for such a thing. 
"In that case," replied Francis, "let it be. It is better to 
put aside good things than to give scandal." Yet were his 
thoughts that day full of the mystery of music. The next 
night as he was lying awake thinking of God, suddenly there 
came to him the sound as of a viol being played ; and as the 
bow touched the strings, such surpassing melody came forth 
as no earthly viol could produce : so that Francis forgot all 
his pain. The morning following he said to the brother : 
" Brother, our Lord who consoles the afflicted never leaves me 
without consolation. I could not hear the viol of men ; but 
I have heard one far sweeter." And he told his experience 
of the night. 2 

Probably to escape the noise of the world Francis had 
himself removed from the city to the hermitage of Monte Eain- 
erio. Here he underwent the treatment which the physician 
prescribed. To relieve the agony of one of his eyes, it was 

1 ll Celano, 41 ; Leg. Maj. xi. 5. 3 II Celano, 126; Leg. Maj. v. 11. 



TOWARDS EVENING 361 

thought well to cauterise his upper cheek. When the phy 
sician suggested this, Francis replied that he was willing to 
submit to whatever Brother Elias his superior should deter 
mine, for in the matter of his body he had no will of his own 
but was altogether in their hands. 

So the iron for the cautery was got ready. For a 
moment Francis feared lest in the application he might 
shrink from the pain : but bracing his spirit to the ordeal he 
looked steadily at the iron in the fire : " my brother fire ! " he 
exclaimed, " amongst all creatures most noble and useful, be 
courteous to me in this hour, for I have ever loved thee and 
ever will love thee for love of Him Who created thee ". The 
attendant brethren, less brave, left the room : but Francis 
making the sign of the cross over the burning iron, submitted 
without a tremor. When the operation was over the breth 
ren came back. "0 weak-spirited and of little faith, why 
did you flee? " Francis said to them; " in truth I tell you I 
felt not any pain nor sense of heat, so that if it is not well 
burned, he may burn me better ". 

But little relief came from this cauterising. Another time 
afterwards they opened the veins above the ear : but equally 
without giving relief. Another physician was called into con 
sultation. He cauterised both ears, piercing them with the 
burning iron : and yet no relief came. 1 The serene endurance 
with which Francis underwent all these operations was a 
marvel to those who attended him. One of the physicians 
told the brethren, he would have applied such drastic remedies 
with fear even to the strongest man ; yet this man so weak 
and ill, bore all without a sign of grief. 2 

The secret of his endurance was, in truth, that indomitable 
joy which had come to him with the renewal of his spirit on 
Alvernia and at San Damiano. He was living in that joy and 
not in his bodily troubles. Frequently would he break into 
song, sometimes composing new canticles and setting them 
to music : in these moments of inspiration he was once again 
back in the wattle hut at San Damiano where his soul had 

1 Spec. Perfect, [ed, Sabatier], cap. 115; Celano, Tract, de Mirac. 14. 
2 ibid. ; Leg. Maj. v. 9. 



362 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSISI 

found its new utterance : and because of the remembrance, 
he sent these canticles to Clare, knowing how she would 
rejoice in them and how well she understoood. 1 

He was eager too for new adventures for the love of his 
Lord Christ. In the knowledge and vision which had come 
to him it seemed as though he were but at the beginning of 
life. " My brothers," he would say, "let us begin to serve 
the Lord God, for hitherto we have done nothing or hardly 
anything." With a sort of caress his desire went back to 
the aspirations of his early days. At times he wished to 
return to the service of the lepers. At other times, however, he 
thought to retire to some far-off hermitage, where the world 
would not trouble him, and give himself wholly to prayer: 
this was when some echo of his troubles cast a shadow over 
his joy. 2 Yet again the surgent missionary instinct would be 
strong in him and he longed to go forth and proclaim God s 
love, and urge men to praise and worship Him. Unable to 
do this and yet unwilling to be a silent and useless herald of 
his Lord, he would dictate messages of faith to be sent abroad 
to stir up men to love God. Of such sort is the letter 
addressed to the governors and magistrates of the people in 
all parts of the world, in which he begged of them to see that 
due reverence be paid to the Blessed Sacrament of the Altar 
and that the people be warned by a crier or by other means 
every evening to give praise and thanks to God. Another 
letter he caused to be written to the custodes of the Friars 
Minor, urging them to announce and preach the praises of 
the Lord and to exhort the people to respond to the call of the 
bells and worship God. 3 

So the winter wore on. The physicians remedies 
brought but temporary reliefs : they could not arrest the 
disease. Cardinal Ugolino therefore advised that Francis be 
taken to Siena where the physicians were of good repute in their 

1 Spec. Perfect, [ed. Sabatier], cap. 90. 

2 Celano, 103; Leg. Maj. xiv. 1. 

3 Opuscula S.P.F. (Quaracchi), Epist. iv. and v. pp. Ill and 113. Cf. p. 192. 
Pr. Paschal Kobinson, The Writings of St. Francis, pp. 125 and 127. Boehmer 
(Analekten, p. 70) classes the letter to the governors amongst the " doubtful " 
writings ; but internal evidence is all in its favour. 



TOWAEDS EVENING 363 

profession. 1 So in the first spring days they set out for the 
Tuscan city : and amongst the attendants was a physician 
who was under a vow to enter the Order. 2 

The journey was lightened by an incident which belongs 
to the romance of Francis story. They had reached Tuscany 
and were passing through the undulating country between 
Campilia and San Querico, when three poor women met them 
in the road ; three sisters they might have been so similar 
were they in feature and dress. Seeing Francis, they bowed 
and saluted him with this novel salutation : " Welcome, 
Sir Poverty ! " 3 : then passed on. A chivalrous delight 
thrilled the heart of Francis at this unexpected greeting, 
and for awhile he was wholly entranced in the thought. 
Then he remembered how poor the three women seemed to 
be, and he begged the physician to go back and give them 
each an alms : and this the physician did, giving to each a 
piece of money. But when on rejoining the company, the 
physician and brethren looked back, the women were 
nowhere to be seen. In after days the story went that these 
three women were the three evangelical virtues, poverty, 
chastity and obedience : and they who told the story thought 
it not strange that this witness should have been given to the 
singular holiness of Francis. 4 But to Francis they were but 
the messengers of heaven bearing witness to his mystic 
alliance with the Lady Poverty. 

1 1 Celano, 105. 

2 " Medicum quendarn. Ordini obligatum," II Celano, 93. 

3 " Bene veniat, Domina Paupertas." As Mr. Montgomery Carmichael 
suggests, Domina in this instance is adjectival to Paupertas, and conse 
quently is governed as to gender by the noun with which it is associated. As 
addressed to a man the words therefore should be rendered Sir Poverty (or 
Lord Poverty) and not Lady Poverty as translators usually render them. Cf . 
Celano s Legenda Secunda in Art in Franciscan Annals, July, 1911, p. 217. 

4 II Celano, 93 ; Leg. Maj. vii. 6. Celano notes the fact of the disap 
pearance, but merely adds : " Plurimum stupefacti mirabilibus [Dei] eventum 
adnumerant, mulieres non fuisse scientes, qua avibus ocius transvolassent ". 
But St. Bonaventure, less cautious, unhesitatingly adopts the construction 
put upon the occurrence by the saint s physician and attendants. Yet he 
only cites the saint s companions (not the saint himself) as seeing in the 
occurrence " a something mysterious ". It is he who adds the detailed 
explanation of the three evangelical virtues. 



364 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSIST 

Of his sojourn at Siena this only need be said, that the 
citizens received him with a reverent tenderness : they were 
anxious to look upon him and hear his voice. One sent him 
a live pheasant, knowing how he loved the birds ; l another, a 
Dominican friar, learned in theology, came to him propound 
ing a thesis ; 2 a Friar Minor, a stranger from Brescia, by 
stratagem got sight of the stigmata. 3 But not all the skill of 
the physicians was of any avail : Francis grew weaker and it 
was seen that his end was fast approaching. 

One night he had a violent hemorrhage, and the attendant 
brethren thought he must surely die. In their distress they 
gathered around him, weeping and crying out : " Father, what 
shall we do without thee ? To whom wilt thou leave us 
orphans ? Always hast thou been to us father and mother, 
begetting and bringing us forth in Christ. Thou hast been 
our captain and shepherd, our teacher and corrector, teach 
ing and correcting more by example than by word. Whither 
therefore shall we go, sheep without a shepherd ? orphaned 
sons without a father, men rude and simple without a cap 
tain? " Thus did they make lament, unable to restrain their 
grief. Finally they begged him at least to leave his blessing 
to all his sons and some written testament of his will that 
in after times the brethren might be able to say : " These 
words did our Father leave to us his brethren and sons, at 
his death ". 

At that Francis bade them call Brother Benedict of Pirato, 
a holy priest who had said Mass for him during his sickness. 
And when Brother Benedict came, Francis said to him : 
Write how that I do bless all my brethren who are now in 
our religion or who shall ever come into it even to the end of 
the world. And since on account of my weakness and the 
pain of my infirmity I am not able to speak much, in these 
three words I briefly lay open my will and intention to all 
the brethren present and to come : namely that in token of 
my memory and blessing and last will, they love one another 
as I have loved them ; that they forever love and observe our 

1 II Celano, 170 ; Tract de Mirac. 26. 
2 II Celano, 103. 3 ibid. , 137. 



"TOWAKDS EVENING" 365 

Lady Poverty ; and that they always be loyal and subject to 
the prelates and clergy of Holy Mother Church." l 

Meanwhile word had been sent to Brother Elias, who came 
hurrying to Siena, to take Francis back to Assisi : for he 
knew that Francis wished to die where he had found his 
vocation, and too that the people of Assisi would never for 
give him if he allowed the saint to die elsewhere. Moreover, 
it is not unlikely that Elias was already dreaming of the 
great shrine he would build to receive the body of the saint. 
1 Spec. Perfect, cap. 87. 



CHAPTEE IV. 
THE LAST JOURNEY. 

THE return journey from Siena was accomplished not without 
difficulty. At the Celle, the hermitage in the ravine outside 
Cortona, they had to rest several days. 1 Whilst they were 
there a poor man came to the hermitage bewailing his lot, 
for his wife was dead and he had a family to support but no 
means. At once Francis gave him the new cloak which the 
brethren had but just procured to replace another which he 
had given away to a beggar on the road. With shrewd 
humour he bade the man on no account to give it up to 
anyone unless he were first well rewarded. At that moment 
the brethren came hastily on the scene, claiming the cloak. 
But a look from Francis steeled the man s heart and he 
clung to his gift till the brethren gave him compensation. 2 

Leaving the Celle, Blias avoided the direct road which 
leads to Assisi by Perugia ; for he knew that the Perugians 
would not scruple to seize a dying saint, in order to add 
his relics to the treasures of the city. He therefore turned 
aside through the mountains, taking the long road round by 
Gubbio and Nocera ; and for greater security he sent word 
to Assisi that a guard be sent to meet them beyond the 
mountains. So at Bagnara above Nocera an armed escort 
awaited them. As they moved forward they came to the 
village of Satriano in the hills. Here the soldiers, hungry 
from long fasting and the journey, sought to buy food ; but 
the villagers, probably resenting an overbearing importunity, 
refused to sell. In their predicament the soldiers came back 
to Francis and said laughingly: "It is needful that you 

1 1 Celano, 105. 

2 II Gelano, 87, 88. Of. Spec. Perfect, [ed. Sabatier], cap. 35. 
366 




LE CELLE 

(Near Cortona) 



THE LAST JOUBNEY 367 

share with us your alms, else must we go foodless ". Francis 
retorted: "And right is it you can find nothing since you 
put your trust in your flies instead of God ". By flies 
he meant their coins. Then he bade them go back to the 
villagers and beg food humbly for the love of God. The 
villagers thus appealed to, gave of what they had. 1 

As the party approached Assisi they were met by the citi 
zens who had come out as for a festival. With loud cries they 
welcomed the saint, and strange as it might seem to men of 
this day, their joy was the greater because they knew he could 
not live long. He was in truth no longer the man, but the 
saint, in the eyes of these mediaeval folk : they were anxious 
to give him the honours of sainthood and already anticipated 
the glory of enshrining his body and invoking his aid from 
heaven. 2 So careful were they that this sacred treasure 
should not be again exposed to loss, they would not allow 
him to be taken out to the Porziuncola in the exposed plain, 
but had him lodged in the bishop s palace in the city. And 
Francis had to submit. He understood his people and he 
had no fear now of their adulation. Spontaneously and simply 
he referred the world s praise of himself to the sweet Saviour, 
so utterly did he see himself as the servant whom the King 
had deigned to honour : which indeed is the supreme humility 
of a perfect love. So when one day a brother in the freedom 
of familiar converse, laughingly asked him for how much he 
would sell his sackcloths to the Lord, seeing that silken cover 
lets would later on cover his body ; Francis cheerfully replied : 
" you speak the truth ; it shall be so for the praise and bless 
ing of my God ". 3 

And now as he lay on his sick bed, his thoughts went 
out frequently to the brotherhood he had founded : and per 
haps with the greater tenderness because of the thoughtful 
attentions the brethren were showering upon him in their 
anxiety. 4 Sometimes, too, brethren would come to him seek 
ing advice and direction in the difficulties which they foresaw 

1 Celano, 77 ; Leg. Maj. vn. 10. 

2 1 Celano, 105 ; Spec. Perfect, [ed. Sabatier], cap. 22. 

3 Spec. Perfect, [ed. SabatierJ, cap. 109. 4 e.g. ibid. cap. 111. 



368 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

would arise after his death. Francis replied to them with a 
simple directness, not always without a troublous emotion as 
he brought his soaring ideals to judgment upon the things 
that were. One day a brother a man of singular piety and 
wholly devoted to the Order, says the chronicle asked 
Francis : " Father, you will pass hence, but the family which 
has followed thee, will be left behind in this vale of tears. 
Suggest, if thou canst, one in whom thy spirit rests, upon 
whom the Ministership-General may safely belaid." Francis 
feelingly made answer: " My son, I see none fitted to be the 
leader of this great army, the shepherd of this vast flock. But 
I will try to describe, and as the saying is, fashion with my 
hand, one in whom may be clearly seen what sort of man 
should be the father of this family. 

" He should be a man of the highest character, of great dis 
cretion and of praiseworthy reputation ; a man without private 
attachments, lest the greater love he shows to some should 
scandalize the whole body; a man to whom the study of 
prayer is his friend, who will give certain hours to prayer 
and certain hours to the flock committed to his care. For 
at dawn of day he should be present at the celebration of 
Mass and in prolonged devotion commend himself and his 
flock to the Divine protection. But after prayer let him stand 
in public to be heckled by all, to reply to all and with gentle 
ness to make provision for all. He should be a man who will 
create no foul clique by accepting persons; one who will 
care no less for the lowly and simple than for the learned and 
great. A man, to whom it may be allowed to excel in the 
gift of learning, but who nevertheless in his conduct will bear 
the image of pious simplicity and foster virtue. A man who 
will abhor money, the chief cause of corruption to our pro 
fession and perfection ; who being the head of a poor Order 
and setting himself before the others as their example, will 
never wrongfully make use of money-chests. Nought else 
should he have save a habit and little book on his own ac 
count, and on account of the brethren a box of pens and a 
seal. Let him not be a collector of books nor given to over 
much reading, lest he take away from his office what he gives 



THE LAST JOUKNEY 369 

to study : a man, who, since he is the last resource of those 
who are in trouble, will console the afflicted so that the dis 
ease of despair may not overcome the sick through his lack 
of means to renew them in health. That he may bend the 
froward to meekness, let him abase himself and waive some 
what of his right in order to gain a soul for Christ. Let him 
not shut up the bowels of tenderness towards those who have 
fled from the Order as if they were sheep who have perished, 
knowing how overpowering must be the temptations which 
can urge a man to so great a fall. 

" I would have him honoured by all as one holding the 
place of Christ, and provided for in all things necessary with 
all goodwill. But it behoves him not to take pleasure in 
honours nor to delight in favours more than in injuries. If 
through weakness or weariness he needs more palatable 
food, let him not take it in private but in public that other 
invalids may be relieved of shame in providing for their 
bodies. To him chiefly it belongs to discover the secret con 
science and to draw forth the truth from the hidden springs 
and not to lend ear to tattlers. Finally such a man should 
he be, who will on no account blemish the manly beauty of 
justice out of a desire to hold on to dignity ; a man who feels 
so great an office to be more of a burden than a dignity. 
Nevertheless let not apathy be brought about through exces 
sive gentleness, nor discipline be dissolved through mistaken 
indulgence ; for whilst he is an object of love to all, he shall 
be no less an object of terror to them who do evil. I would 
also that he have associates endowed with goodness, who 
even as he, will set an example of all good things ; men 
stern against the world s pleasures, strong in the face of 
hardships ; yet becomingly genial, that they may receive all 
who come to them with a holy cheerfulness. Behold the 
General of the Order, such as he should be." l 

To these days of bedridden sickness we owe indeed many 
of the sayings of Francis that have come down to us ; for 
some of the brethren, anxiously looking to the time when he 

1 II Celano, 184-6 ; Spec. Perfect, [ed. Sabatier] cap. 80. 

24 



370 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIS1 

would be no longer with them, were diligent in writing down 
his words. 1 

As the Pentecost Chapter drew near at which ministers 
and brethren from all the provinces of Italy were to be pre 
sent, Francis longed once again to be amongst them. That 
being impossible he dictated a letter to be read at the Chapter.- 
It was for the most part a passionate plea that the brethren 
should " show all the reverence and all the honour they 
possibly can to the most holy Body and Blood of our Lord 
Jesus Christ, in Whom the things that are in heaven and 
the things that are on earth, are brought into peace with and 
reconciled to Almighty God," and he begged the priests " being 
pure, to offer the sacrifice purely, with a holy and clean 
intention, not for any earthly interest, neither from fear nor 
love of man/ but with a will directed to God. 

" Call to mind, my brothers, priests," he wrote, " what is 
written in the law of Moses : how those transgressing even 
materially died by the decree of the Lord without any 
mercy. 3 How much more and worse punishments does he 
deserve to suffer who hath trodden under foot the Son of 
God and hath esteemed the Blood of the testament unclean 
by which he was sanctified and hath offered an affront to 
grace. 4 For man despises, soils, and treads under foot the 
Lamb of God when, as the Apostle says, not discerning and 
distinguishing the holy bread of Christ from other nourish 
ments or works, he either eats unworthily or, if he be worthy, 
he eats in vain and unbecomingly ; since the Lord has said by 
the prophet : Cursed be the man that doth the work of the 
Lord deceitfully . 5 And He condemns the priests who will 
not take this to heart saying : I will curse your blessings . 6 
Hear ye, my brothers : if the Blessed Virgin Mary is so 
honoured, as is meet, because she bore Him in her most 

1 Cf . Spec. Perfect, cap. 87. 

^Opuscula S.P.F. (Quaracchi), Epist. n. p. 98 and p. 185; Fr. Paschal 
Robinson, The Writings of St. Francis, p. 109 ; Ubertino da Casale (Arbor 
Vita, V, cap. vn.) tells us this letter was written " in fine dierum suorum" " at 
the end of his days. 1 

3 A reference to 1 Cor. n. 27. 4 Hebrews x. 29. 

5 Gf . Jeremias XLVIII. 10. 6 Malachi 11. 2. 



THE LAST JOUKNEY 371 

holy womb ; if the Blessed Baptist trembled and did not 
dare to touch the holy forehead of God ; if the sepulchre in 
which He lay for some time, is venerated ; how holy, just and 
worthy ought he to be who touches with his hands, who 
receives with his heart and his mouth, and proffers to be 
received by others, Him Who is now no more to die but to 
triumph in a glorified eternity ; on Whom the angels desire 
to look. 1 Consider your dignity, brothers, priests, and be ye 
holy because He Himself is holy. 2 And as the Lord God 
has honoured you above all, through this mystery, even so 
do you also love and reverence and honour Him above all." 

In these and many more words did he plead with them 
once again for that which he had so yearningly pleaded for, 
ever since the far-off days which ushered in his conversion 
when he had been struck with shame at the neglect of 
the churches and the lack of reverence for the sacrament 
of the altar. 3 

One other document Francis wrote about this time, namely 

1 Of. 1 Peter i. 12. 2 Cf. Leviticus xi. 44. 

3 There is one passage in this letter ordering that "one mass only" be 
celebrated each day in the places of the brethren, even if there be many 
priests in the community. Melanchthon used this passage as an argument 
against private masses in his Apology. Of. Opuscula, I.e. p. 104; Fr. 
Paschal Robinson, p. 115. It may be taken for granted that St. Francis 
had no intention of condemning a practice favoured by the Church, for 
he was too Catholic in his obedience : but this mere statement of a self- 
evident principle hardly solves the question raised. The simple answer, 
however, seems to be that Francis was legislating for a particular purpose 
and against an actual evil. He wished the brethren to celebrate " not for 
any earthly interest" (vide Opuscula, I.e. p. 101), but as concentrating their 
being upon the fulfilment of the divine Will. The frequent legislation of the 
Church concerning offerings for masses, indicates the danger against which 
Francis wished to guard the brethren. Better have one mass said with an 
entirely spiritual intention, than many masses with an intention less spirit 
ual. In a word, it was a regulation meant to guard and foster reverence for 
the Blessed Sacrament : just as in certain cases a priest might advise less 
frequent reception of the sacraments, with no intention of condemning as a 
general principle the more frequent reception. Idealist as he was, Francis 
was no theorician : he always spoke and acted in reference to particular 
actualities. Hence there is a peculiar danger in reading absolute principles 
into his actions or sayings : one may so easily render absolute, what in his 
mind was merely relative to a particular contingency. 

24* 



372 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSISI 

his Last Will and Testament, and in that too we shall find 
the same anxious thought and the same passionate prayer. 1 

Meanwhile, despite the buoyant energy of his spirit, his 
bodily strength was rapidly failing. A physician of Arezzo 
named Buongiovanni, with whom Francis was on terms of 
friendship, now came to visit him. " Tell me, Bembern- 
gnate," said Francis (addressing him familiarly), "tell me 
what you think of this dropsy of mine." Buongiovanni 
answered warily : " All will go well with you by God s grace ". 
" Tell me the truth," retorted Francis, " and do not be afraid, 
for by God s grace I am no craven that I should fear death : 
by the grace of the Holy Spirit that worketh in me, I am so 
made one with my Lord that I am equally content to live or 
die." Then the physician said plainly: "According to our 
medical science your sickness is incurable and I believe that 
you will die at the end of September or by the fourth of the 
nones of October ". At that Francis lay back in his bed and 
stretched out his hands to heaven: "Welcome, Sister 
Death! " he exclaimed ; and in his face was a great happi 
ness. 2 

But some little while after the physician had gone, Francis 
fell into such unwonted pain that even his exalted spirit 
could hardly maintain its cheerfulness. Then one of the 
brothers his name is not recorded, but blessed should it be 
for that in this extremity he was a true disciple of his master 
came and stood by him, speaking the right words of com 
fort : " Father," he said, " thy life and conversation was and 
is a light and mirror not only to thy brethren but to the 
whole Church ; and the same will be thy death ; and although 
to thy brethren and many others, thy death will be a matter 
of sadness and sorrow, to thyself it will be a consolation and 
measureless joy ; thou wilt pass from sore labour into exceed 
ing rest, from many temptations and griefs into eternal peace, 
from the earthly poverty which thou hast loved and perfectly 

1 See also Verba Admonitionis, i. (Opuscula, [Quaracchi] ; p. 1 Fr. Paschal 
Robinson, loc. cit. p. 5) ; and the exhortation De reverentia corporis Domini 
(Opuscula, loc. cit. p. 22 ; Fr. Paschal Robinson, loc. cit. p. 22). 

2 Spec. Perfect, cap. 122. 



THE LAST JOUENEY 373 

observed, to true and infinite riches and from this temporal 
death itself to the endless life where thou shalt see face to 
face thy Lord God whom in this world thou hast loved with 
so great a fervour of love and desire ". Then after a while he 
went on : " Father, know of a truth that unless the Lord 
send thee healing from heaven, thy sickness is incurable 
and thou hast but a short time to live, as the physicians have 
said. But this I have said for the comforting of thy spirit 
that thou mayest rejoice both in body and mind so that when 
thy brethren and others shall visit thee they may find thee 
always rejoicing in the Lord, and after thy death both to 
those who see this thing and those who hear of it, thy death 
may be a perpetual memorial, as was and always will be thy 
life and doings." 

At this Francis revived in spirit and again the gladness 
came into his voice as he replied : " If it be so that it please 
my Lord that I die shortly, then call to me Brother Angelo 
and Brother Leo that they may sing to me of Sister Death ". 
They came, full sad and sorrowing, and as Francis desired 
they sang to him the " Canticle of the Sun," weeping as they 
sang. But when they came to the last verse, Francis, now 
again all fervour of joy, added yet another verse : 

Praise be to thee, my Lord, for our sister, Bodily Death, 

From whom no living man can flee ; 

Woe is to them who die in mortal sin. 

But blessed they who shall find themselves in Thy most holy will. 

To them the second death shall do no ill. 

Outside the palace the soldiers who had been set by the city 
magistrates to guard the place and prevent Francis being taken 
away by stealth, heard the singing and spoke of it, as men 
will speak eagerly of the unwonted to their friends. For it 
is not the way of men to die singing ; at least it is not how 
men expect a saint to die. And now the singing came fre 
quently to their ears as they kept their watch, not only in 
the day but even in the night. The talk of the people at last 
reached the ears of Brother Elias, and he was disturbed in 
mind lest Francis reputation for sanctity should be lessened. 
He came therefore to Francis and expostulated : " My dearest 



374 LIFE OF ST. FEANCIS OF ASSISI 

Father, truly glad am I both for thy own sake and that of thy 
companions at the joy thou showest in thy sickness. But 
the men of this city think thee a saint and believing that thou 
must shortly die, they ask, when they hear these praises being 
sung by day and night : How is it he thus openly rejoices, he 
who is about to die and should be thinking of his death ? " 
But Francis replied straightly : "Do you remember how at 
Foligno you had a vision and told me someone had said to 
you that I should not live beyond two years ? Before that 
by God s grace I frequently pondered by day and night upon 
my end ; but from the hour of that vision I have been the 
more careful to think daily of the day of my death. Leave 
me, brother, to rejoice in the Lord and in His praises and in 
my infirmities, for by the grace of the Holy Spirit working in 
me, I am so united and wedded to my Lord that by His 
mercy I can well be merry in the Most High ". 1 

Yet at this time his suffering was very great, and all strength 
seemed to have left his body so that he was unable to move 
himself and depended entirely on those who tended him. A 
brother pityingly asked him which he would rather have, this 
drawn-out daily suffering or the cruel death of a martyr? 
Francis replied : " Son, that to me has been and is dearest 
and most acceptable, which it pleases my God to let happen 
to me ; yet in regard to the distress of my suffering, this sick 
ness, were it but to last three days, is more grievous than any 
martyrdom ". And indeed every member of his body was in 
pain. 2 

But one day it seemed as though he were on the very 
point of death. In alarm the brethren gathered around him 
and besought him to bless them before he died : they were 
Elias and some others whom Francis had especially desired 
to come to him. As they pressed near, Francis extended his 
hands in blessing. Being blind, he was unable to see them. 

Then happened a characteristic incident. Elias was on 
Francis left, whether by accident or design we know not. 
The days which had passed since first Elias had been appointed 
Vicar-General, had revealed to himself and to the dying leader, 

1 Spec. Perfect, [ed. Sabatier] cap. 121 . 2 1 Celano, 107. 



THE LAST JOUBNEY 375 

the gulf of the spirit which separated them : yet Elias loved 
Francis in his own way and in this hour craved his blessing. 
Francis divined what was passing in the soul of his master 
ful lieutenant : pitiful and generous, he would not deny 
him this pledge of fellowship ; praying it might be fellowship 
indeed. Crossing his arms, he asked upon whose head his 
hand rested. They told him: "upon the head of Brother 
Elias ". " That is as I wish," replied Francis ; and thereupon 
he invoked this blessing upon him : " My son I bless thee in 
all things, and through all things, and as the Most High has 
multiplied my brothers and sons in thy hands, so upon thee 
and in thee do I bless them all. May God the King of all, 
bless thee in heaven and on earth. I bless thee as far as I 
can and more than I can ; and what I cannot do, may He do 
in thee, He Who can do all things." 

With his right hand still on the head of Elias, he con 
tinued : " Farewell in the fear of God, all ye my sons, and 
abide in Him always ; for exceeding temptation is about to 
come to you and tribulation draws nigh. Happy shall they 
be who persevere in those things which they have begun, for 
the scandals that are to be, shall cause some to part therefrom. 
But I am hastening to the Lord and I trust to go now to my 
God Whom with devotion I have served in my spirit." 1 Sadly 
through the blessing wailed the insistent prophetic fear ! 

Shortly after this Elias obtained the consent of the city 
to remove the dying saint to the Porziuncola, for Francis 
had a certain longing of heart to die there in the bridal home 
of the Lady Poverty : and because of his urgency they dared 
not refuse. 2 So, late in the summer, 3 Francis made the last 
stage of his last home-coming journey. 

1 1 Celano, 108. 

2 M. Sabatier suggests (Spec. Perfect, p. 243, note 1) that Elias had Francis 
r emoved to the Porziuncola to avoid the disedification he feared from Francis 
joyous singing. Possibly this had some weight with Elias ; but surely one 
cannot know Francis without recognising his indomitable will in matters of 
moment to his own vocation. It was only by constraint that at any time he 
would lodge in palaces. One can hardly think of him consenting to die in 
one. 

y l Celano, 109, tells us that Francis was only a few days at the Porziun 
cola before his death : "paucis qiiievisset diebus ". 



376 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSIST 

Out by the gate of the city, called Portaccia, 1 they carried 
him lying on a bed, and descending the hill they reached the 
high road. 2 How well Francis knew it ! That road was 
bound to his heart by countless associations with the doings 
and aspirations of all these past years since his conversion : 
and as he was carried along now, these associations came to 
his memory in a long swift procession ; and his heart swelled 
with emotion, as he lived again in quick remembrance of those 
past days : and over his soul there swept a yearning solicitude 
for the fraternity of his love mingled with keen gratitude to 
this city of its birth. 

They had come about half the journey and had reached 
the hospital of the Crucigeri 3 whence there is a clear view of 
the city. There Francis bade the bearers stand and put the 
bed on the ground and turn his face to the city. It was as 
though he would gaze upon the city for the last time ; but he 
was blind. Yet with his face turned towards it, he raised 
himself upon the bed, and in the hearing of those who stood 
by, prayed thus rerniniscently and with supplication : " Lord, 
whereas of olden time this city was, as I believe, a place and 
dwelling of wicked men, now do I see that because of Thine 
abundant mercy in the time that it pleased Thee, Thou hast 
marvellously shown forth in her the multitude of Thy mercies 
and because of Thine own goodness hast taken her to Thyself 
to be the place and dwelling of those who should acknowledge 
Thee in truth and give glory to Thy Holy Name and make 
manifest to all Christian people the sweet odour of good 
fame, of holy life, of the truest Gospel teaching and perfection. 
I beseech Thee, therefore, Lord Jesus Christ, Father of 
mercies, that Thou consider not our ingratitude but be mind 
ful always of Thine own most abundant tenderness which 
Thou hast shown forth in her, that she may be ever the place 
and dwelling of them who acknowledge Thee truly and glorify 

1 The Portaccia is now walled up. It is between the Porta di Mojano and 
the Porta S. Pietro. 

2 The old Perugia-Foligno road ran nearer to the city than does the new 
road ; it went by San Damiano. To-day it is but an unkempt path. 

3 On the site where the Casa Gualdi now stands. 



THE LAST JOUENEY 377 

Thy blessed and most glorious name for ever and ever. 
Amen." l Then again the solemn procession passed on. 

So Francis was brought back to the Porziuncola to die. 

1 Spec. Perfect, cap. 124 The traditional blessing, inscribed over the Porta 
Nuova in Assisi, reads : " Benedicta tu a Domino, Sancta Civitas Deofidelis, quia 
per te animce multa salvabuntur et in te multi servi Altissimi Jiabitabunt et de 
te multi eligentur ad regnum aternum." Of. Fioretti, Delle sacre sante stimate, 
iv. Consid. ; Wadding, Annales, ad an. 1226. 

But the text of the Speculum Perfect., apart from other considerations, is 
more in the spirit of Francis. It is a prayer for the fraternity as well as for 
the city. Moreover the transition from the form of supplication to that of 
prophecy, leads one to suspect the shorter version. It is just the sort of change 
one finds in later versions. 



CHAPTEE V. 
TESTAMENT AND DEATH. 

THE evening light had fallen upon the life of Francis when 
he came back for the last time to his beloved chapel in the 
wood : upon his spirit there was the mystic peace of the day s 
labour finished. 

But if the lowlands were in shadow, the hilltops were 
aglow, those beacons of his chosen life towards which Francis 
had, through the long years, turned with persistent desire. 
Peacefully triumphant they stood out now amid the falling 
darkness, still holding the light of the day that was passing 
and pledging the fair day to come. Shortly now would his 
earth s day be closed : it had held its troubles and sorrows, 
its difficulties and temptations ; but these he remembered 
only as favours of his Lord s love Who had called him in the 
way of the Cross. But mostly it had been a day of joy, and 
as a day of joy Francis looked back upon it in the evening 
light. For the earth had given to him his Lady Poverty and 
the fraternity ; he had walked its ways as a herald of the Lord 
and in his adventurous wandering had found the knowledge 
and hope of his soul s desire. Truly had earth s life been to 
him the preparation-phase of the great High Mass of the 
Christian life, with humble confession of sin and glorifying 
of God, with scriptural lesson and Gospel promise. Now as 
he was about to pass to the very offering of the mystic sacri 
fice, with a backward look of deepest gratitude and a stretch 
ing forth to the mystery before him, he gathered his soul 
together and in measured tones of unwavering conviction said 
his Credo. This was the Testament which Francis dictated 
in these last days at the Porziuncola/ to be a memorial to his 

1 Wadding (Annales, ad an. 1226) says that the Testament was written at 
the Celle of Cortona, when Francis rested there on his journey back from Siena. 

378 



TESTAMENT AND DEATH 



379 



brethren to the end of time. It was a confession of his faith 
in" the vocation to which he and the brethren had been called. 
" This is the way in which the Lord led me," it says in effect ; 
" in this leading I believe." Thus like the martyrs and the 
heroes of chivalry and all true men, he uttered his Credo in the 
face of death. 

The Testament runs thus (and you who read it may see 

therein as in a mirror, the soul of this long story of Francis 

life ; and that you may have a more distinct remembrance 

I indicate its several articles of belief in the margin) : 

His belief The Lord gave to me Brother Francis thus 

in the to begin to do penance : for when I was in sin 

service of it seemed to me too bitter a thing to see lepers, 

lepers : and the Lord Himself led me amongst them, 

and I dealt mercifully with them. 1 And when 

I left them, what had seemed bitter to me, was 

changed into sweetness of soul and body ; and 

afterwards I tarried yet awhile and then left 

the world. 

in churches, And the Lord gave me such faith in churches 
that I would simply pray and say : We adore 
Thee, O Lord Jesus Christ, here and in all 
Thy Churches which are in all the world ; and 
we bless Thee because by Thy holy Cross 
Thou hast redeemed the world. 

in priests After that, the Lord gave me and He gives 

and the me still so much faith in priests who live 

Roman according to the form of the Holy Roman 

Church. Church, on account of their Order, that if they 

This seems very doubtful, for at the Celle Francis had a relapse owing to an 
increase of dropsy (Of. I Colano, 105), and would hardly be able to dictate a 
lengthy document such as the Testament. The tradition which assigns the 
writing of the Testament to the Porziuncola seems therefore more probable. 
Gregory IX in the bull " Quo elongati " (Sbaralea, Bull. i. p. 68) says Francis 
wrote it " circa ultimum vitce suc&" but this phrase might of course refer to 
any time within a few months of his death. 

1 Some versions read : " I made a sojourn with them " "fed moram (in 
stead of misericordiam) cum illis ". Vide Miscell. Franc, in. p. 70. But in 
I Celano, 17, we find the passage quoted as in the text. 



380 



LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSIST 



persecuted me, I would have recourse to them. 
And if I had as much wisdom as Solomon had, 
That and I found priests of this world, poor and 

priests lowly, I would not preach against their will in 

must be the parishes in which they live. And these and 

reverenced ; all other [priests] I desire to fear, love, and 
honour as my lords ; and I am unwilling to 
consider sin in them, because in them I see the 
Son of God, and they are my lords. And I do 
this because in this world I see nothing cor 
porally of the Most High Son of God Himself 
except His most Holy Body and Blood which 
they receive and which they alone administer 
to others. 

as also the And I desire that these most holy mysteries 
mysteries of be above all things honoured, and revered and 
the altar, placed in precious places. 

and the Wheresoever I should find His most holy 

Names and Names and written Words in unseemly places, 
Words of I desire to gather them up and I beseech that 
God ; they be gathered up and put in some becoming 

place. 

and theo- And all theologians and those who minister 

logians and to us the most Divine Words we must honour 
ministers of and revere as those who minister to us spirit 
the Divine and life. 

Words. And after that the Lord had given me some 

brothers, no one showed me what I ought to 

His belief do, but the Most High Himself revealed to me 

concerning that I must live according to the form of the 

the Rule Holy Gospel : and I made it to be written in 

few words and simply ; and the Lord Pope 

confirmed it for me. 

And those who came to receive this life, gave 
to the poor all that they possessed and they 
were content with one tunic patched within 
and without, those who wished, and with 
a cord and breeches : and we wished for no- 



TESTAMENT AND DEATH 381 

and the life thing more. We clerics said the office like 
of the other clerics, the lay brothers said the Pater- 

fraternity, nosier, and willingly enough we abode in 
churches. And we were simple and subject to 
all. And I worked with my hands, and so I 
[still] desire to work, and I firmly desire that 
all the other brethren work in some honest 
employment. Let those who know not [how 
to work] learn, not through desire to receive 
the price of their labour but for example s sake 
and to repel idleness. And when the price of 
our labour is not given to us, let us have re 
course to the table of the Lord, begging alms 
from door to door. The Lord revealed to me 
this salutation, that we should say : " The Lord 
give thee peace". Let the brethren take care 
not on any account to receive churches, poor 
dwelling-places or any other things which are 
built for them, unless they be such as become 
the holy poverty which we have vowed in the 
Kule, always dwelling here as pilgrims and 
strangers. I strictly command all the brethren 
by obedience that wherever they may be, they 
shall not dare to ask any letter at the Eoman 
Court, either themselves or by any intermediary 
person, neither for a church nor for any other 
place, nor under pretext of preaching, nor on 
account of bodily persecution ; but wherever 
they are not received, let them flee into another 
land to do penance with the blessing of God. 
And I firmly desire to obey the Minister-General 
of this fraternity and that guardian whom it 
shall please him to give me. And I desire to 
be so held in his hands that I cannot go or act 
beyond obedience and his will, because he is my 
master. And although I am simple and weak, 
nevertheless I desire always to have a cleric 
who will perform the office for me as is con- 



382 



LIFE OF ST. FRANCIS OF ASSIST 



tained in the Kule. And all the other brothers 
are bound to obey their guardians and to per 
form the office according to the Bule. And 
That the should any be found who do not perform the 
brethren office according to the Rule and who wish in 
must be some way to change it, or who are not Catholics, 

Catholics; let all the brothers, wheresoever they are, be 
and that bound by obedience, wheresoever one of those 
heretics be found to present him to the nearest custos 

must be de- of the place where he is found. And the custos 
livered up. is strictly bound by obedience to guard him 
strongly as a prisoner both by day and by 
night, so that he cannot be taken out of his 
hands, until he shall personally place him in 
the hands of his minister. And the minister is 
strictly obliged by obedience to send him by 
such brothers as shall guard him day and night 
as a prisoner until they present him before the 
lord of Ostia, who is the lord, protector and 
corrector of the whole fraternity. 

This is not And the brethren shall not say : This is an- 

another other Rule ; for this is but a remembrance, 

Rule but a admonition and exhortation and my testament, 
remem- which I, Brother Francis, your little one, make 

brance. for you my blessed brethren, to the end that we 

may observe in a more Catholic way the Rule 
which we have promised to the Lord. And let 
the Minister-General and all the other ministers 
and custodes be bound by obedience not to add 
to, nor take away from, these words ; and let 
them always have this writing with them beside 
the Rule. And in all Chapters which they hold, 
when they read the Rule let them read also 
these words. And I strictly command by obe 
dience all my brethren, whether clerics or lay- 
brethren, that they put no glosses on the Rule 
nor on these words, saying : So they are to be 
understood. But, as the Lord gave me simply 



TESTAMENT AND DEATH 383 

and purely to speak and to write the Kule and 
these words, so you shall understand them sim 
ply and purely, and with holy doing observe 
them unto the end. And whosoever shall observe 
these things let him be filled in heaven with the 
A blessing, blessing of the Most High Father, and on earth 
with the blessing of His beloved Son, together 
with the Most Holy Spirit, the Paraclete, and 
all the Powers of heaven and all the saints. And 
I, Brother Francis, your little one and servant, 
in so far as I can, confirm unto you within and 
without this most holy blessing. Amen. 1 

It was nigh upon the feast of St. Michael, heaven s 
sentinel, when Francis made his last preparations to meet 
the summoner, Death. Full deliberately would he die, even 
as he had lived. Then knowing that the days were few, he 
bade the brethren send a messenger quickly to Rome to trie 
Lady Giacoma di Settesoli she who had befriended him so 
often in the past, to beg her to come to him 2 and bring with 
her a fitting panoply for death : a gown of grey cloth, a napkin 
to cover his face, a cushion for his head, wax-candles to burn 
at his bier and some sweet-cake such as she sometimes had 
made for him when he visited her house. 3 For at the end 
Francis would make a feast for his body that it might share 
in the joy of his soul. 4 

But before the messenger had started, the brethren were 

J Cf. Opuscula S. P. F. (Quaracchi), pp. 76-82, and pp. 173-176; Fr. 
Paschal Robinson, The Writings of St. Francis, p. 79 seq. There is no question 
of the authenticity of the Testament : it is cited textually in I Celano, 17 ; II 
Celano, 163 ; 3 Soc. vin, 29 ; Leg. Maj. in. 2. Also in the bull of Gregory IX, 
" Quo elongati" (Sbaralea, Bull. Franc. I. p. 68) and in St. Bonav. Epist. de tribus 
Quaest. (Opera Omnia [Quaracchi], torn. vm. p. 335. 

2 It is evident from Celano, Tract, de Mirac. 37, that Francis desired the 
Lady Giacoma to visit him, and not merely as the Spec. Perfect, cap. 112, 
might be taken to imply that she should send him the things needed for his 
burial. 

3 " Mostacciuolo, a confection of almonds and sugar and other things " 
(Spec. Perfect, loc. cit.). 

4 See also the incident of the parsley he fancied, II Gelano, 51. 



384 LIFE OF ST. FEANCIS OF ASSISI 

aroused by the tramping of horses and the buzz of many 
voices at their very gate, and the porter came hurrying to say 
that the Lady Giacoma with her sons and a great retinue 
was waiting without. "Now blessed be God," replied 
Francis, " Who has sent our Brother Giacoma to us. Open 
the gates and lead her inside. For the rule concerning 
women is not for Brother Giacoma." So the Lady 
Giacoma was brought into the cell where Francis lay; 
and greatly did all the brethren marvel when they saw 
that she brought with her all that Francis had bidden them 
ask her to bring. But the Lady Giacoma told them how she 
was praying and a voice spoke to her spirit, telling her to 
hasten if she wished to see the blessed Francis, and to take 
with her the things she had brought. Glad indeed were the 
Lady Giacoma and all her company that they had arrived to 
see the saint alive ; and the gladness mingled with the pity 
of their tears : it might have been a festive home-gathering 
rather than a meeting for a burial. For a time after 
their coming, Francis seemed to regain strength, so that the 
brethren hoped desperately that his end would yet be not so 
near at hand. But the Lady Giacoma wished to remain 
now until the end : and Francis bade her remain until the 
Sunday, saying he would die on the Saturday. So sending 
back part of her retinue, she took up her abode near the 
cells of the brethren, she and her sons and some few of her 
esquires. 1 

Beyond the woods at San Damiano the spirit of Clare 
was keeping vigil over the death-bed at the Porziuncola : 
and the more harmoniously since Clare herself was stricken 
with sickness. 2 Eight willingly she acknowledged the claim 
of the chapel in the wood to hold him at the last, for it was 
the shrine and symbol of his vocation and of her own vows : 
and valiantly she submitted to give to him that comfort of 
the spirit. Yet was she sorely stricken, knowing that in this 
life she would not again see nor converse with him : and 

Delano, Tract, de Mirac. 37,38; Spec. Perfect, [ed. Sabatier] cap. 112; 
Bern, a Bessa, Liber de Laud. vm. ; Fioretii, iv. Consid. 
2 Spec. Perfect, [ed. Sabatier] cap. 108. 



TESTAMENT AND DEATH 385 

upon her there was already the sorrow of the orphaned ; and 
for that she wept bitterly. Then one of the brethren brought 
to Francis the message of her grief, and at the telling he was 
greatly moved ; and he bethought him how best he might 
console her, since now he could not visit her. After awhile 
he bade a brother write down these words : 

" I, little Brother Francis, desire to follow the life 
and poverty of our most high Lord Jesus Christ, and of 
His most holy mother, and to persevere therein until 
the end. And I beseech you, rny ladies, and I give you 
counsel that you live always in this most holy life and 
poverty. And be greatly careful of yourselves lest by 
the teaching or counsel of any one, you in any way or at 
any time draw away from it." l 

This writing he bade the messenger take back to Clare, 
saying: " Go and tell Sister Clare to put aside all sorrow and 
sadness, for though she cannot now see me, yet before her 
death both she herself and her Sisters shall see me and have 
great comfort of me ". 2 Now after his death the brethren re 
membering these words, brought his body to San Damiano, 
as we shall further on relate, that Clare and the Sisters 
might gaze once more upon it. And this was a partial fulfil 
ment of the promise. But to the soul of Clare the promise 
which brought her sure comfort, meant more than this. She 
who understood Francis with the understanding of an utterly 
kindred spirit, knew that he had sent her a pledge of the 
spirit rather than of the body. In the after-years when Clare 
and the Sisters of San Damiano were to be the foremost de 
fenders of his ideal, then would his spirit be with them to be 
their stay and comfort ; and they would know that he was 
with them ; and that would be their joy. Such comfort it 
was that Francis sent to Clare and her Sisters as his dying 
legacy : and no greater comfort could he send. And Clare 

1 The text is given in the Rule of St. Clare, cap. vi. Vide Leg. Seraph. 
Textus Origitiales (Quaracchi), p. 63 ; and in Opuscula (Quaracchi), p. 76. 
Of. Test. S. Clares, Boll. Acta SS. die 12 Aug. Tom. n. p. 747 ; Leg. Seraph. 
Textus, p. 276. 

2 Spec. Perfect, [ed. Sabatier] cap. 108. 

25 



386 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSIST 

understood in this as in all else that concerned the secret of 
his soul. 

One last care now remained, and that was for his Lady 
Poverty and the home she had made with him in the Por- 
ziuncola. Very tenderly had his heart grown round this 
place : for in truth it was his special dower to the bride of 
his love, and he would not that it should ever pass away 
from her. Gathering the brethren around him, he besought 
them never to desert it. " See, my brothers," he pleaded* 
" that you never leave this place : if you are thrust out on one 
side, enter it again on the other : for truly this place is holy 
and the dwelling of God. Here when we were but a few, 
the Most High multiplied us ; here with the light of His 
wisdom, he enlightened the hearts of His poor ones ; here 
with the fire of His love, He set our wills on fire : here whoso 
ever prays with a devout heart, will obtain what he asks, and 
whosoever offends will be more hardly punished. Wherefore, 
sons, hold this place of God s dwelling, worthy of all 
honour ; and with all your heart in the voice of exultation and 
praise, confess to God therein." l 

The shadows were now fast closing, ushering in the last 
solemn act of that evening sacrifice. St. Michael s day had 
come and passed, bringing doubtless to Francis its own 
call from the leader of heaven s army, whom he had been 
accustomed to honour with a knight s true devotion. 2 

Francis now prepared to lay down his offering upon the 
Altar of his Lord. Wishing to pledge once more his faith to 
Poverty, he called the brethren around him and bade them 
lay him upon the bare ground and remove his tunic. Then 
with face turned upwards to the heavens and his left hand 
covering the wound in his right side, he said to those around : 
" I have done what it was mine to do ; may Christ teach you 
what is yours ". At that the brethren wept aloud. But the 
Father Guardian divining his thought, brought to Francis 
a tunic, and breeches and a sackcloth cap, and said to him : 
" know that this tunic and breeches and cap are lent thee by 
me in holy obedience ; and that thou mightest know that 
1 1 Celano, 106 ; Spec. Perfect, cap. 83. 2 Cf . II Celano, 197. 



TESTAMENT AND DEATH 387 

thou hast no right of property in them, I deprive thee of all 
power of giving them to anyone else ". At these words the 
face of Francis beamed with a great joy, for he saw in this 
loan, a pledge that he had kept faith with Lady Poverty. 1 

A while afterwards with a great content of soul, he bade 
two of the brethren whom he specially loved, sing to him 
in a loud exultant voice the verse of the " Canticle of Brother 
Sun " which declares the praise of God in Sister Death. But 
whilst yet they sang, his own feeble voice broke into that 
hymn of a dauntless hope, the 141st psalm : 2 "I cried to the 
Lord with my voice ; with my voice to the Lord I made sup 
plication ". Every verse of that psalm might be taken as a 
text for the unfolding of the singer s story ; each verse wend 
ing towards the final prayer : " Bring my soul out of prison 
that I may praise Thy Name ; the just wait for me until Thou 
reward me". 3 

Thinking that the end must surely be nigh, Bernard da 
Quintavalle, the first of his noble companions and the most 
revered, said to him : " Ah, gentle Father, alas ! thy sons are 
fatherless now and the true light of their eyes is taken from 
them. Be mindful of the orphans whom thou leavest and 
forgive them their offences and gladden them all, both those 
who are present and those who are absent, with thy holy 
blessing." And Francis made reply: "See, my son, I am 
called by God : I forgive my brethren, whether present or ab 
sent, all their offences and faults and, as far as I can, I absolve 
them : do thou proclaim this to them and bless them all for 
me ". But to soothe them in their grief he spoke to those 
about him comforting words ; and he besought them to love 

1 II Celano, 214 ; Leg. Maj. xiv. 4 Francis used a cap to cover the scars 
left by the cauterizing of his eyes. 

2 i.e. according to the Vulgate : the 142nd according to the Authorized 
Version. 

:! St. Bonaventure (Leg. Maj. xiv. 5) places this singing of the psalm at 
the very end and makes Francis die singing the last verse. And this version 
of the story has been generally followed by later biographers. But in the nar 
rative of events leading up to Francis death in I Celano, 109 seq. it precedes the 
blessing and the reading of the Gospel. In II Celano, 217 we read that after 
giving his blessing to the brethren, Francis lived a few days : " proinde paucos 
dies, qui usque ad transitutu," etc. 

25 * 



388 LIFE OF ST. FEANCIS OF ASSIST 

God and Poverty and "to put the Holy Gospel before all 
other ordinances "- 1 And then they drew near and he blessed 
them, laying his hands upon their heads : but to Brother 
Bernard he gave a blessing of special tenderness and solicitude, 
because he was the first of those who had come to him : and 
he bade all the brethren hold him in particular honour as the 
chief and foremost of their knightly band. 2 

Then, with his mind still bent upon the imitation of 
his Lord, he bade them bring some bread, and because he 
was too weak to break it himself, he had it broken into small 
pieces, and to each brother he gave a piece : and so he gave 

1 II Celano, 216. 

2 1 Celano, 109, does not mention Bernard da Quintavalle by name, but 
says : " Frater quidain de assistentibus quern sanctus satis magno diligebat 
amore ". I think, however, that there can be little doubt that the incident he 
refers to is the same as that recorded in Fioretti, cap. vi. ; and Chron. xxiv. 
Gen. (Anal. Franc, in. p. 42). True in II Celano, 216, where this second 
blessing is again referred to, it is said : " Incipiens a vicario stto capitibus 
singidorum imposuit ; " but Celano omits the details, and there is nothing 
in this phrase which contradicts the story in the Fioretti, for there too we 
read that Francis first placed his hand upon the head of Elias, though he 
had called for Bernard. In the sequel, at Brother Bernard s suggestion he 
placed his left hand on the head of Elias at the same time as he held his right 
hand on the head of Bernard ; thus saving the dignity of the Vicar-General. 
The words given in I Celano, 109 : " quibus tu liccc denuntians, ex parte mea 
omnibus benedices," certainly lend colour to the more explicit commission 
given to Bernard in the Fioretti. It is certainly singular that Francis should 
have commissioned Bernard and not Elias, to convey his last blessing to 
the brethren. But that it was not Elias who was thus commissioned is fairly 
evident since Celano, who in the Prima Legenda is always explicit regarding 
the privileges accorded to Elias, does not attribute this privilege to him. 
There is nothing inconsistent in the Fioretti story with the known history of 
Francis. If it is objected that Francis could not have said : "Sia ilprincipale de 
tuoifratelli," etc., one has only to remember Francis descriptions of true obed 
ience, as not merely a submission to legal superiors but as implying a ready 
submission, prompted by love, to all one s neighbours: and this wider obed 
ience he would have both superiors and subjects practise towards all. (Cf. 
Regula i. cap. v.) Why not then in a pre-eminent degree towards Bernard, 
the first Friar Minor after Francis himself ? Further, may not one see a 
delicate reference in II Celano, 216 : " Nullus sibi hanc benedictionem usurpct 
. . . sedportius ad officium detorqiiendum " to the curse pronounced by Francis, 
according to the Fioretti story, against those who should deal injuriously with 
Bernard ? 



TESTAMENT AND DEATH 389 

his last commandment of mutual love as Christ his Master 
had given it at the Last Supper. 1 

Now his earthly cares were finished : yet Sister Death 
lingered on her way. Francis awaited her coming with 
song : content that she should come when his Lord willed. 
Around his bed the brethren sang the song he loved most, the 
" Canticle of Brother Sun ". 

But at length they knew that Death was already at the 
door. With chivalrous salutation Francis exclaimed : " Wel 
come, Sister Death ! " and turning to his physician, he bade 
him as a herald announce her coming boldly ; for he added, 
" She is to me the gate of life ". To the brethren he said : 
" When you see me at my extremity, put me upon the ground 
as you saw me three days ago and when I am dead leave 
me there for such space of time as it takes a man leisurely to 
walk a mile ". 2 

So at the end they laid him habitless on the bare earth. 
Divining his wish the brethren had prepared to read to him 
in his last moments the Gospel of the Passion according to 
St. John ; but Francis, not knowing their intention, himself 
asked that that Gospel should be read. Then when the 
reading was over he bade them lay him upon sackcloth and 
sprinkle him with ashes in anticipation of his burial : for in 
his courtesy he would welcome death in all its dread offices. 
And whilst the brethren stood around in solemn reverence 
and sad expectancy, he died. 3 It was then just after the 
hour of sunset. Outside the cell a multitude of larks had 
gathered in the twilight and were sending their melodies 
joyously through the still air. 4 And one of the brothers, a 
holy man, at that same moment saw a brilliant orb of light 

1 II Celano, 217 ; Spec. Perfect, cap. 88. 

- II Celano, 217 ; cf . Leg. Maj. xiv. 4. 

:! I Celano, 110 ; Leg. Maj. xiv. 5. There is a discrepancy between these 
two authors. According to Celano the reading began at chapter xn. : 
" Ante sex dies Paschce " ; according to St. Bonaventure, at chapter xui. : 
" Ante diemfestum Paschcp ". Cf . Montgomery Carmichael, " The Gospel read to 
S. Francis in transitu, " in Dublin Review, April, 1903. 

4 Leg. Maj. xiv. G ; Celano, Tract, de Mirac. 32. 



390 LIFE OF ST. FRANCIS OF ASSIST 

borne by a little cloud, ascending as it were across many 
waters in a straight course to heaven. 1 

But within the cell the brethren were gazing in amaze 
ment and awe upon the lifeless body, forgetting for awhile 
their loss in the wonderful thing they saw. For the body so 
long contracted with pain, became supple and smooth and 
straight, and the dark flesh became exceeding white, and into 
the eyes long dull with disease, there came as it were the 
light of day. And then for the first time, most of them saw 
the five wounds of the stigmata ; and it seemed to them as 
though they were gazing upon the very Body of Christ 
Himself. And all that night crowds from the city came 
hurrying in to see this miracle which had been so carefully 
hid from the sight of men : and all the people wept aloud, 
but it was more for joy than for sorrow. 2 Early the next 
morning they bore the body of the saint in solemn state to 
the little church of San Giorgio within the city, where 
Francis had learned his letters and preached his first 
sermon ; for the citizens would have no delay lest the Peru- 
gians might come swiftly and take the body. All the city, it 
seemed, took part in the procession : some held lighted 
tapers, but most of them carried boughs of olive and other 
trees ; and as they went along the singing of hymns alternated 
with the blare of trumpets. It was not the sad carrying of a 
man to his grave but the triumphant translation of a saint s 
relics. 

Remembering the message Francis had sent to Clare from 
his death-bed, the brethren would not take the shorter way 
to the city through the great gate, but went round by San 
Damiano ; and there they carried the body into the church, 
and certain of the brothers took the body from its coffin and 
held it in their arms at the opened grille at which the sisters 
received the Holy Communion. Then Clare and all the 

1 1 Celano, 110 ; Leg. Maj. xiv. 6. According to Chron. xxiv. Gen. 
(Anal. Franc, in. p. 226), this brother was a Brother James. He is mentioned 
in the martyrology of Fortunatus Hueber under 7 June. 

I Celano, 112, 113. See the Letter of Brother Elias to Gregory of Naples 
(Bcehmer, Analekten, p. 90). 



TESTAMENT AND DEATH 391 

sisters wept bitterly, realizing more poignantly their loss in 
the sweet presence of the dead. But when they all had 
kissed the wounded hands, the procession again formed and 
went on its way until it came to the church of San Giorgio. 
There they laid the body in a temporary shrine to await the 
building of the great church which was to be the glory of 
the city and of all the land of Umbria. The day was the 
fourth of October, in the year 1226. a 

Less than two years later, on 16 July, 1228, Francis was 
canonized by his friend Cardinal Ugolino, now become Pope 
under the title of Gregory IX. 2 And straightway by order 
of the Pontiff, Brother Elias set his imperious genius to the 
construction of the great church which was to be at once the 
saint s sepulchre and the monument of a world s homage. 3 
Hither on 25 May, 1230, the body of Francis was carried and 
secretly buried ; but the story of that second burial belongs 
not so much to the history of Francis as to another history. 4 
Even in its eager desire to honour him the world must needs 
kick against him, not understanding the spirit which dwelt 
in him. He was not of the world. And yet the world loved, 
and in its blundering fashion, worshipped him. It was so 
in his life ; it was even so in his death. But whilst the 
world went on its blundering way, there were some, and 
they were not a few, who both loved and understood. 
Francis had not lived in vain. 

1 Cf. I Celano, 116-18 ; Leg. Maj. xv. 1-6 ; Spec. Perfect, cap. 108 ; Fioretti, 
iv. Consid. According to the ecclesiastical usage of the time, the day was 
reckoned from the decline of the sun, i.e. the hour of vespers, and not from 
midnight. Thus Francis died according to our style of computing the day, at 
sunset on 3 October, and was buried on 4 October. 

2 The bull of canonization was published on 19 July. Gf. Sbaralea, Bull. 
i. p. 42 seq. 

:! By Papal authority money for the building of the church was collected 
throughout Europe. Cf. Sbaralea, Bull. i. p. 46 ; Glassberger, in Anal. Franc. 
n. p. 56. 

4 Vide letter of Gregory IX " Speravimus," Sbaralea, Bull. i. p. 66 seq. ; 
Eccleston, op. cit. pp. 80-82; Chron. xxiv. Gen. in Anal. Franc, in. p. 212. 



APPENDIX I. 
THE PRIMITIVE RULE OF ST. FRANCIS. 

THAT the Primitive Rule approved orally by Innocent III is contained in 
the so-called Regula Prima of 1221, J there can be, I think, little doubt. 

1. The Regula Prima professes in the prologue to be that confirmed 
by Innocent III. As the Regula Prima stands this would be impossible ; 
for Innocent III died in 1216, and many of the ordinances in that Rule 
are easily traceable to a later date. Yet Francis would not have retained 
this prologue if the Primitive Rule was not incorporated in the Regula 
Prima. 

2. But anyone who reads the Regula Prima will be struck by its 
patchwork character as regards style : it has manifestly been built up by 
accumulation ; it is not homogeneous. 

At times the ingrafting of new additions is clumsily done, as e.g. 
cap. ii. concerning the goods of novices ; cap. x., where it goes on to say 
that the brethren shall have no power or domination amongst themselves. 
Again there are repetitions, as though the legislator was re-enacting a 
former ordinance with increased emphasis ; e.g. in capp. in. and ix. 
it is laid down that the brethren may eat of whatever food is set before 
them. 

Yet, again, the difference in character and style between different pas 
sages is very marked. There is a lack of consistency of tone. The voice 
of the idealist alternates at one time with that of the legalist, at another 
with that of the master evidently arguing with those who doubt ; e.g. 
compare cap. i. or cap. xiv. or the opening of cap. ix. with cap. xv. 
and cap. vni. ; and the difference is not merely a difference of subject- 
matter ; the tone is different : there is a difference in the immediate out 
look, like the difference between sunshine and a grey day. Some of the 
passages glow with the simplicity of the apostle in the first time of his 
enthusiasm, with his idealism yet unbruised by experience with the world : 
and in these passages you find something of the sublime universality of 
the Gospel. Other passages are manifestly written in view of actual con 
tingencies and lack the glow and joyous fervour of the former. 

3. Now it is undoubtedly those passages which glow with the sim- 

^f. Opuscula (Quaracchi), pp. 2G-G2. 
393 



394 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

plicity of the idealism of the primitive Franciscan life, which belong to the 
Primitive Rule. The other passages were written afterwards to incorporate 
either capitular decrees, e.g. in cap. vn. the warning against "sad hypo 
crites " ; or papal injunctions, e.g. in cap. n. concerning novices and in 
cap. v. concerning those who wander about without obediences ; or they 
were ordinances made to meet new situations, as cap. xvi. concerning 
missions to the infidels, and cap. xviu. concerning the holding of Chapters. 

In one chapter cap. xxii. we have apparently a summary of St. 
Francis s admonitions to the brethren. 

Now in regard to the Primitive Rule, Celano tells us that Francis 
wrote it " for himself and his brethren, present and to come, simply and 
in few words," and that he used chiefly the words of the Gospel, after 
whose perfection alone he aspired (I Celano, 32) ; and St. Bonaventure 
says : " He wrote for himself and his brethren in simple words a rule of 
life in which, taking the observance of the Gospel as an inviolable founda 
tion, he inserted a few other things which seemed necessary for a uniform 
mode of life " (Leg. Maj. in. 8). 

The Primitive Rule, therefore, was brief and chiefly consisted of 
passages from the Gospel, but with a few enactments necessary for the 
common life of the fraternity. 

M. Sabatier (Vie de S. Francois, chap. in. p. 101 seq.) asserts that 
the Primitive Rule was nothing else than the passages of the Gospel which 
Francis had read to his first companions he evidently refers to the read 
ing of the Gospel in the Church of St. Nicholas (vide supra} together 
with certain regulations concerning manual labour and the occupations of 
the brethren. But this is putting a limitation upon the passages of the 
Gospel used by Francis in his Primitive Rule, which is unwarranted by 
the descriptions given by Celano and St. Bonaventure. 

We may surely assume that the dominant characteristics of the primi 
tive life, as we know it from history, were reflected in the Primitive Rule, 
and that they for the most part found an evangelical formula there. And 
that is just what we find when we collect together those passages of the 
Regula Prima which bear the manifest impress of the primitive simplicity 
and idealism of the Franciscan spirit. Again, anyone conversant with 
the life and character of Francis would expect of the Primitive Rule that 
it would be almost exclusively an expression of principles rather than a 
code of practical regulations or of "constitutions". Francis was from 
beginning to end an idealist and a poet. In the practical application of 
his ideals he waited on circumstance ; he made a practical regulation 
only when a situation arose, which demanded a practical decision, and then 
his decision was formulated by the occasion : he never seems to have run 
ahead of the occasion, but he waited until the actual demand for a 
decision came to him. Thus he acted in the various stages of his "con 
version " : we find the same mode of action in the development of his 
vocation and apostolate. 



APPENDIX I 



395 



As regards the additions to the Primitive Rule in the Regula Prima, 
they may be summed up as : 

1. Oapitular ordinances. 

2. Judicial or prophetic warnings against evident dangers. 

3. Papal decrees. 

4. All that concerns the ministers, and also clerics as separate from 

lay-brothers. 

5. Those passages which presuppose that the brethren are widely 

scattered, as where phrases of this sort occur : universis fra- 

tribus " ; " ubicumque sunt " (or " fuerint "). 

With these principles of exegesis before us we may now proceed to 
give an analysis of the Regula Prima in detail. It will be seen that the 
result obtained differs in many instances from that arrived at by Karl 
Miiller (Die Anfdnge des Minoritensordens, pp. 14-25) who seems to me 
to have included in the Primitive Rule certain portions of the Regula 
Prima which belong to a somewhat later date, and even passages which 
I incline to think were inserted as late as 1221. 



ANALYSIS OF EEGULA PEIMA. 



Text. 

PROLOGUE. 
In nomine 

Patris et Filii 
et Spiritus 
Sict. Amen. 



Haec est vita 
quam frater 
Franciscus 
petiit sibi con- 
cedi et confir- 
mari a domino 
papa Inno- 
centio. . . . 
Et alii fratres 
teneantur 
fratri Fran 
cisco et ejus 
successoribus 
obedire. 



Remarks. 



Primitive. 



*** 

Primitive ; but probably inserted by the Pope. 
Celano in speaking of the Primitive Rule, quotes the 
phrase of this passage: " fratribus suis habitis et futu- 
ris " (I Celano, 32). 3 Soc. 52, says : " The other brothers 
according to the precept of the lord Pope in like manner 
promised obedience and reverence to the Blessed 
Francis ". 

M. Sabatier (cf. De I authenticite de la legende de S. 
Francois, p. 20, note) denies that these words of 3 Soc. 
refer to the Primitive Rule ; but that is simply because 
they militate against M. Sabatier s particular theory re 
garding the Primitive Rule. 

Also it is asserted in Analecta Bollandiana, xix. p. 
129, that the passage "Et alii fratres teneantur," etc., is 
an interpolation in the Regula Prima from the Rule of 
1223. But this is mere assumption. It is more probable 



396 



LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 



that the words were transferred from the Regula I into 
the Regula II. 



*** 
CHAPTER I. 

Regula et vita 
istorum 
fratrum . . . 
et vitam aeter- 
nam possidebit. 

*** 
CHAPTER II. 

Si quis divina 
inspiratione 
. . . recipiatur 
ab eis. 



*** 



.*** 
Quodsi fuerit 

firmus acci- 
pere . . . 
diligenter ex- 
ponat. 



* 
* # 

Si vult et 
potest spiri- 
tualiter . . . 
pauperibus 
studeat erogare. 

*** 

Caveant autem 
alii pauperes 



The whole of this chapter is primitive. The earliest 
life is entirely shaped by it ; e.g. in regard to the pas 
sage from Matthew xix. 29 : " Si quis vult venire ad me" 
etc., cf. 3 Soc. 45 : " Sollicite etiam petebant ne mitteren- 
tur ad terram ubi nati erant" etc. 



*** 



* 
* * 



Primitive. The words : " si quis divina inspiratione " 
are quite in St. Francis style of speaking. Compare the 
idea of Divine calling in his words to Bro. Giles, Vita B. F. 
Aeyidii [ed. Lemmens], p. 39. The phrase is used in 
the Forma vivendi Francis gave S. Clare (Opuscula [ed. 
Quaracchi], p. 75) and in Regula n. cap. xu. 

So also the words " benigne recipiatur ab eis " are 
quite characteristic of Francis spirit. Cf. I Celano, 27- 

31 ; Vita B. F. Aegidii, loc. cit. I. pp. 39-40. 

* 

* * 

This passage, as it stands, could only have been 
written after the institution of Ministers-Provincial in 
1217 ; and it is probably a regulation against some actual 
abuse. Francis himself advised and assisted Bernard da 
Quintavalle in disposing of his goods. But later experi 
ence in this matter as in others, may have made Francis 

take a stricter view. 

* 
* * 

This is certainly primitive. From the beginning 
Francis insisted upon the candidates distributing their 
goods to the poor. Probably the contingent phrase " si 
vult et potest spiritualiter et sine impedimento " was 
inserted by the Pope, as a measure of prudence. Cf. II 

Celano, 80, 81. 

* 

* * 

As it stands this passage is of later date. But some 
such prohibition of receiving any part of the goods of 
novices was in force quite early in the fraternity, as is 
evident from II Celano, 67. It is curious that the 
warning against meddling with the goods of novices is 
given twice, almost in the same words. Quite manifestly 
this chapter has been subjected to frequent interpola 
tions. 

*** 



APPENDIX I 



397 



Et cum 
reversus . . . 
si necesse 
fuerit, 
cingulum et 
braccas. 

* 
* * 

Et omnes fra- 
tres, vilibus . . . 
in domibus re- 
gum sunk 

.*** . 
Et licet dican- 

tur hypocritae 
. . . regno 
coelorum. 



Of later date. The regulations concerning novices are 
not earlier than 22 September, 1220, when Honorius III 
published the Bull " Cum secundum " (Bull. Franc. I, 
p. 6). The permission to have two tunics is opposed to 
primitive practice. Of. I Celano, 39 : " Sola tunica erant 
contenti ". Cf. Spec. Perfect* cap. 3 ; Testamentum S, 
Franc. 



*** 



Primitive. 



*** 



Doubtful. We read in Celano how the friara at an 
early period were denounced as hypocrites (I Celano, 46). 
This admonition was probably designed to meet similar 
circumstances. 



CHAPTER III. 
Dicit Domi- 
nus: Hoc 
genus . . . 
quolibet die. 



Omnes fratres 
jejunent . . . 
secundem 
Evangelium. 



Of capitular origin. In the beginning of the Order the 
brethren said the Pater Noster and Adoramus Te Christe 
instead of the ecclesiastical office : as Celano and St. 
Bonaventure bear witness (I Celano, 45 ; Leg. Maj. iv. 
3). Celano gives as the reason that the brethren were 
ignorant of the office : " in simplicitate spiritus ambu- 
lantes adhuc ecclesiastieum officium ignorabant ; " St. 
Bonaventure, that they had not the necessary books : 
"pro eo quod nondum ecclesiastlcos libros habebant ". 

Note that both Celano and St. Bonaventure are speak 
ing of the time following the approbation of the Rule. 

The passages which allow the brethren who can read, 
whether clerics or lay-brothers, to have books for saying 
office can hardly have been put in on Francis initiative : 
cf. II Celano, 195; Spec. Perfect, cap. 4. Probably 
these passages were inserted at a General Chapter on 
the initiative of the ministers. 

*** 

Doubtful. Giordano da Giano (in Anal. Franc, i. p. 6) 
says : " secundum primam regulam fratres feria quarta 
et sexta jejunabant ". From the beginning the brethren 
would observe the accustomed lents of the Church, and 
probably others according to their devotion. The lent 
preceding Christmas as it stands in the text is but a 
lengthening of the Advent Lent which in many places 
began at St. Martin s feast, and in other places at the 



398 



LIFE OF ST. FEANCIS OF ASSIST 



CHAPTER IV. 

In nomine Do 
mini omnes 
fratres, etc. 

* 
* * 

CHAPTER V. 

Ideoque ani- 
mas vestras 
. . . sed male 
habentibus. 



beginning of Advent. It was Francis intense devotion 
to the Sacred Incarnation which probably led him to 
lengthen this fast. Similarly his devotion to our Lord s 
earthly life led him to begin the Easter Lent immediately 
after the feast of the Epiphany, because on that day the 
Church celebrates (amongst other mysteries) the baptism 
of Jesus Christ, and immediately after His baptism our 
Lord began His fast in the desert. Quite possibly, there 
fore, these fasts may have been of primitive observance ; 
as would also be the permission " to eat of all foods set 
before them". But whether the passage as it stands 
was substantially in the primitive Rule, is doubtful. In 
reference to Giordano s statement, it is noteworthy that 
the Humiliati fasted on Wednesdays and Fridays. 



*** 



Of later origin : probably capitular, after the establish 
ment of the Provinces in 1217. 



*** 



Capitular ; after the institution of Chapters and minis 
ters. 



Omnes fratres Primitive. This passage as it stands is utterly unlike 

non habeant any legal enactment and breathes the simple evangelical 

aliquam potes- idealism of St. Francis. Cf. 3 Soc. 41 seq. 

tatem . . . 

voluntarie ser- 

viant et obedi- 

ant invicem. 

Et haec est vera 

et sancta obedi- 

entia D. N. J. 

Christi. 

*** 

Et omnes Capitular decree in view of the troubles of 1220. Cf. 

fratres . . . Bull "Cum Sccundum," of 22 September, 1220. Cf. II 
benedicti sint Celano, 32-4. 
a Domino. 



APPENDIX I 



399 



CHAPTER VI. 

Fratres in 
quibuscumque 
locis . . . 
laret pedes . 



CHAPTER VII. 

Omnes fra- 
tres ... in 
eadem domo 
sunfc. 



Capitular : after institution of ministers. 

But the passage : " Nullus vocetur prior sed generaliter 
omnes vocentur fratres minor es " may be anterior to the 
preceding passages. Honorius III, in the Bull " Cum 
Secundum," speaks of the ministers as "priors," and it 
may have been that the passage was inserted in the Rule 
at the Chapter of 1221, in consequence of this. On the 
other hand, Honorius III may have used the term in 
ignorance of the Rule, which was not yet solemnly 
approved. 



* 
* * 



Doubtful. Celano relates that it was on hearing the 
words of the Rule, " Et sint minores " being read aloud, 
that Francis exclaimed : "I will that this fraternity be 
called the Order of Friars Minor " (I Celano, 38). 

If we knew at what date the brethren took the name 
of Friars Minor, we should have more exact ground 
upon which to base our decision as regards this passage. 
I incline to think that it was inserted very soon after 
the approbation of the Rule, with the rapid increase in 
the number of the brethren and their diffusion abroad. 

Possibly the wording of the opening paragraphs may 
have been slightly changed in a later revision of the 
Rule. Celano quotes the phrase alluded to as " Et sint 
minores"; whereas the actual phrase is as: "sed sint 
minores ". 



Et Fratres qui Primitive. Cf. I Celano, 39-40. " tiiebus vero mani- 

sciunt laborare bus propriis qui noverant laborabant," etc. ; " Nullum 
. . . sicut alii officium exercere volebantde quo posset scandalumexoriri," 
fratres. etc. Cf. Testamentum S. Franc.: lt Et ego manibus 

meis laborabam," etc. Also Vita B. F. sEyidii, loc. cit. 

p. 42 seq. 



Et liceat eis 
habere ferra- 
menta et in- 
strumenta suis 
artibus neces- 



Doubtful. From the style I think it to be a some 
what later addition. 



400 



LIFE OF ST. FEANCIS OF ASSISI 



Omnes fratres 
studeant bonis 
operibus . . . 
insistere de- 
bent. 

*** 

Caveant sibi 
fratres . . . 
benigne re- 
cipiatur. 

* * 

Et caveant sibi 
. . . conveni- 
enter gratiosos. 

*** 
CHAPTER VIII. 

Dominus prae- 
cipit . . . cir- 
cumeant. 

CHAPTER IX. 
Omnes fratres 
studeant . . . 
vadant pro 
eleemosynis. 



Later : probably inserted by Caesar of Speyer in 
1221. The quotations are from SS. Jerome and Anselm. 
(cf . Opuscula, p. 34, notes 1 and 2. ) 



*** 



Later. As it stands this paragraph is of later date 
when the brethren had acquired " loci " and hermit 
ages. 



*** 



Capitular. Cf. II Celano, 128. 



*** 



Later. Evidently from the admonitory style it was 
written in view of certain dangers or abuses. 



*** 



Primitive. Cf. Spec. Perfect, [ed. Sabatier], cap. 44 ; 
[ed. Lemmens], no. 12. 



Et non vere 
cuiidentur . . 
praemium a 
Domino. 



*** 

Et secure . 
non habet 
legem. 



CHAPTER X. 
Si quis fra- 
trum, etc. 



Later : probably originally an admonition addressed 
to the brethren. 

Cf. Spec. Perfect, [ed. Sabatier], cap. 18 ; LemmenSj 
De Legenda Veteri in Doc. Antiqua, fasc. n. p. 94. 

Also cf. Epistola i. in Opuscula, p. 91: "Homines 
enim omnia perdunt, etc. 

*** 

Later. The passage referring to the use of foods : 
" Et quandocumque necessitas supervenerit," etc., is 
probably capitular decree of 1221, in answer to the in 
novations of the Vicars-General during Francis absence 
in the East. Cf. Chron. Jordani, no. 11, in Anal. 
Franc. I. p. 4. 

*** 

Later. I judge this from the style (e.g. <e Ubicumque 
fuerit "). There is a summary of this chapter in II 
Celano, 175. 

*** 



APPENDIX I 



401 



CHAPTER XL 
Et omnes fra- 
tres . . . 
Servi inutiles 
sumus. 

*** 

Efc non iras- 
cantur, etc. 



CHAPTER XII. 
Omnes^fra- 
tres, etc. 



*** 



Primitive. It sets forth one of the most distinguishing 
marks of the first friars their fear of useless and un 
charitable words. Cf. 3 Soc. 46 et passim ; I Celano, 
41, 54. Cf. II Celano, 182, where there is an evident 

comparison between the primitive and later days. 

b 
# # 

Doubtful. From the interweaving of scriptural texts 
taken mostly from the epistles I doubt whether it can be 
ascribed to St. Francis. More likely it is the work of 
Caesar of Speyer. Cf . Chron. Jordani, no. 15, in Anal. 
Franc, i. p. 5. 



Later. It contemplates the presence of priests amongst 
the brethren, whereas it is doubtful whether there was 
even one priest amongst those who went with Francis to 
Rome. Moreover, Francis himself received SS. Clare 
and Agnes to obedience in 1212 ; also the anchoress 
Praxedis. Cf. Celano, Trac. de Mirac. 181. This regu 
lation, therefore, must have been of later origin. 

I incline to regard this chapter as written in 1221, on 
account of the abuses of John de Compello and others. 
Cf. Chron. Jordani, no. 13, in Anal. Franc, i. p. 5. 
Possibly, however, the first paragraph was written earlier 
than 1221. The exacting of oaths of obedience was a 
very common practice in the thirteenth century. Masters 
would thus bind their scholars to follow them. Cf. 
Rashdall, Universities, Vol. I. p. 172. 



CHAPTER XIII. 

Si quis, etc. 

*** 
CHAPTER XIV. 

Quando fratres, 
etc. 

*** 
CHAPTER XV. 

Injungo omni 
bus, etc. 



Later. (Cf. " habitu ordinis ".) 



Primitive, cf. I. Celano, 17 ; 3 Soc. 44. 



* 
* # 



Later. (Cf. "tarn clericis tarn laicis ".) 



CHAPTER XVI. 
Dicit Dominus, 
etc. 



Later, written in view of foreign missions, probably in 
1219 or 1221. 



2G 



402 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

CHAPTER XVII. 

Nullus fra- Later, after institution of ministers ; and probably 

trum, etc. not earlier than 1220. 

*** 
CHAPTER XVIII. 

Quolibet anno, Later, after institution of the Chapters, 

etc. 

*** 
CHAPTER XIX. 

Omnes fratres Primitive. The phrase " a nostra fraternitate " indi- 
sint catholici, cates a very early origin. The following admonition to 
etc. respect the clergy is also probably primitive. Cf. I 

Celano, 46 ; Testamentum S. Franc. 

*** 
CHAPTER XX. 

Fratres mei Later. Cf . Epistola in. in Opuscula, p. 108. 

" benedicti," 

etc. 

*** 
CHAPTER XXI. 

Et hanc vel Primitive. Cf. Vita B. F. Aeyidii, loc. cit. p. 41 ; 

talem exhor- 3 Soc. 33. 
tationem, etc. 

*** 

CHAPTER XXII. 

Attendamus. Later. Cf. Epistola i. in Opuscula, pp. 89 and 94, 

for similar exhortations. 

* * 

* * * * 

CHAPTER XXIII. 

Omnipotens Later. (Cf. " Fratres Minores ".) This and preceding 

. . . detes- chapter probably worked up by Caesar of Speyer. 

tabilis est in 

saecula 

saeculorum. 

*** 

In nomine Probably primitive. Compare the ending up of the 

Domini rogo Testament, 
omnes fratres 
. . . et repo- 
nant haec. 



APPENDIX I 403 

Efc ex parte Later : probably 1221. Of. Spec. Perfect, [ed. Saba- 

Dei . . . tier], cap. 68 : " Et ideo volo quod non nominetis mihi 

fratres aliquam regulam," etc. 
habeant. 

*** 

Gloria Patri, Probably primitive, 

etc. 



26 



APPENDIX II. 
THE INDULGENCE OF THE PORZIUNCOLA. 

THE arguments against the authenticity of the Indulgence are based on 
two principal accounts : the silence of the first biographers and chroniclers, 
and the well-known repugnance of St. Francis to seek special privileges 
from the Roman Courb. We will take this second objection first. It can 
indeed hardly be said to bear examination. 

That St. Francis did forbid his friars to apply to the Roman Court 
for privileges is well known. At the same time he himself sought and 
accepted certain very great privileges. 

He went to Rome for the confirmation of his Rule, though at the 
time there was no law obliging him to do so ; he accepted the commission 
to preach and asked for the appointment of a Cardinal Protector. Hence 
he could not have meant to forbid the seeking for or acceptance of all 
favours from the Holy See. We must understand then the sort of privi 
leges he meant to ban from the fraternity. It is evident from his own 
writings, e.g. his Testament, that he had in view privileges which he con 
sidered detrimental to the profession of evangelical humility and meekness, 
and especially such as would make the friars independent of the bishops 
and clergy in the prosecution of their missionary enterprise. Such was 
Francis reverence for the priesthood that he would have his fraternity 
submissive to all bishops and priests in all matters that pertained to their 
office : he would not preach in any parish without the consent of the parish 
priest, nor would he dwell in any place without the bishop s leave. (Cf. 
Regula n. cap. ix. ; Testamentum 8. Franc.) If the clergy opposed the 
brethren in their ministry, the brethren were to gain over their goodwill, 
not by recourse to the Holy See, but by obedience and reverence (II 
Celano, 146, 147). But the Porziuncola indulgence was in no sense a 
privilege of immunity for the brethren : it was a measure of mercy for all 
repentant souls ; it in no way set the brethren above the clergy or other 
people, but was an outpouring of God s grace upon the world. That at 
least was how Francis viewed it. Nor could the indulgence have been 
obtained in any other way than by the authority of the Pope. No bishop 
could grant such an indulgence. 

This objection, therefore, so far as it affects the authenticity of the 
indulgence, falls to the ground. 

404 



APPENDIX II 405 

But the silence of the first biographers and chroniclers is a more valid 
objection. Whichever way we take it, this silence is a difficulty. Neither 
Celano nor Saint Bonaventure, nor the Speculum Perfectionis, nor any of 
the primitive legendists as much as refer to it. The chapter in the 
traditional Legend of the Three Companions is evidently a later addition. 1 

P. Ehrle, S.J., has indeed made a discovery which may prove of primary 
importance in the ultimate solution of this question. In a catalogue of MSS. 
which belonged in 1375 to the papal library at Avignon he found this indica 
tion : Item in volumine signato per C epistole Augustini, Soliloqiiium Augustini, 
meditaciones Ancelmi, Hugo de claustro animcz, plures epistoke fratris Bona- 
vcnturai de evdngelica paupertate, de indulgentia Beatce Maria, Portuensi 
Assisii. . . ." (Of. Ehrle, Bibliotheca Romanorum Pontificum, vol. i. p. 463.) 
But until the letter " de indulgentia," itself is brought to light one cannot use 
it as evidence upon the mere indication of a catalogue ; for it was not un 
common to attribute to famous writers, writings which they never wrote. 
Consequently I cannot follow Mgr. Faloci-Pulignani in his conclusions based 
upon this reference. (Cf. Misc. Franc, vol. x. p. 69, quoted with approval by 
Pere Rene, O.M. Cap. in Etudes Franciscaines, torn. xx. p. 375, note 1.) 

The question now is as to the motive of this silence. At best the argu 
ment from silence is a negative argument, and if we can find a probable 
motive, the value of the silence is largely, if not altogether, discounted. 
Various motives have been suggested. Pere Gratien, O.M. Cap. (Ltudes 
Franciscaines, torn. xvm. p. 4=81) suggests that in the beginning the 
indulgence had not the important character it afterwards assumed, and 
thinks this a sufficient explanation of the maintained silence. 

But the indulgence was undoubtedly an unusual favour for those 
days, and could not have been regarded otherwise, 2 nor can we think that 
in enumerating the exceptional privileges of the Porziuncola chapel (cf. 
I Celano, 106 ; II Celano, 18-20 ; Spec. Perfect, cap. 83 ; 3 Soc. cap. 
xiu.) the biographers, anxious as they were to set forth the sanctity of the 
place, would have omitted mention of so special a favour without some 
special reason. 

Granting then that the indulgence really existed, we are driven to 
attribute the silence to a deliberate policy. Were there reasons for a 

1 It is true the chapter on the indulgence appears in the reconstituted 
version of the 3 Soc. published by Padri Marcellino da Civezza and Teofilo 
Dominichelli ; but this reconstituted text has yet to prove its own authen 
ticity, notwithstanding the doughty championship of M. Paul Sabatier who 
is wholly in its favour. Cf. Bartholi, Tractatus de Indulgentia, ed. Sabatier, 
Introduction. 

2 Pere Rene, loc. cit. pp. 349-50, asserts that plenary indulgences were 
not so rare at the time as has been generally held : but his instances are all 
of a generation later than St. Francis, when possibly a more liberal policy 
was adopted by the Holy See in consequence of the granting of the Porziun 
cola indulgence. Precedents have a way of repeating and even expanding 
themselves. 



406 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSISI 

policy of silence? Upon this point the story of the indulgence the 
authenticity of which we shall examine further on gives a clear indication. 
It tells us how the granting of the indulgence by the Pope aroused oppo 
sition amongst the cardinals. They wished Honorius to revoke the grant ; 
and when he refused to revoke it altogether, they prevailed upon him to 
limit its operation to one day in the year, namely 2 August. Now we know 
that even towards the end of the thirteenth century and during the 
fourteenth, there was still opposition to the indulgence ; and the story 
indicates that opposition was started against it from the first. Nor is the 
opposition unintelligible. "If this indulgence is granted," urged the 
cardinals, "it will bring to nought the indulgence for going beyond the 
seas [i.e. for the crusades] and people will think nothing of the indulgence 
to be gained at St. Peter s." The indulgence would, so to speak, in 
fringe the monopoly of the constituted holy places. It is not at all 
unlikely that the friars, in deference to the wishes of the Curia, would 
cease to proclaim the indulgence, lest it should lessen the devotion of 
the people towards St. Peter s and the crusades ; especially since the 
friars were shortly appointed by the Holy See as the accredited collectors 
for the crusades. 

It may very well have been felt too that silence was necessary not 
merely to benefit the Holy Land, but to prevent the formal revocation of 
the indulgence. Yet I can hardly allow that a policy of silence based on 
expediency would have commended itself to Brother Leo and the Saint s 
companions, had it not been imposed upon them as a sacred duty by 
Francis himself. Their zeal would assuredly have escaped their discretion. 

But those who know the character of Francis will have no difficulty 
in attributing this silence partly to Francis himself. It is quite what 
one would expect that, seeing the opposition of the cardinals to the in 
dulgence, Francis would not allow any open conflict to arise between the 
friars and the Curia. He would not have the indulgence cradled in any 
breach of charity nor in even the appearance of hostility towards the 
clergy. Just as he would not use the privilege of preaching granted him 
by the Holy See, when the bishops were opposed to it ; so he would not 
preach the indulgence in the face of their opposition, but would leave it, 
as he would say, in the care of God Who would make it manifest in His 
own time. And in fact the official witnesses expressly tell us that Francis 
did impose this silence at least until his own death. For according to 
the testimony of Giacomo Coppoli, the friend of Brother Leo, Francis 
told Leo : ""Keep this secret until the day of my death," etc. Cf. Bar- 
tholi, Tract, de Indulgentia, ed. Sabatier, p. liii. 

The silence of the first biographers is therefore no invalidating argu 
ment, provided the positive evidence in favour of the indulgence can bear 
scrutiny. We come then to the attesting evidence. 

We may follow M. Paul Sabatier in classifying this evidence into two 
groups : the official evidence and the popular. (Cf . Bartholi, Tractatus 



APPENDIX II 407 

de Indulgentia, ed. Sabafcier, Introduction, p. xxxviii seq.) The first 
official evidence comes to us from the second half of the thirteenth 
century. In 1277 Brother Angelo, Minister-Provincial of Umbria, set 
himself to collect what evidence might still be gathered concerning the 
granting of the indulgence ; and thus he obtained certain written attesta 
tions subscribed by a public notary. 

There was the evidence of Benedict of Arezzo, who had lived with 
St. Francis, and who heard the story of the indulgence from Brother 
Masseo himself who was with St. Francis when the indulgence was 
granted : also the attestations of a certain Giacomo Coppoli, a citizen of 
Perugia, who repeated what he had heard from Brother Leo ; of Pietro 
Zalfaiii, who was present at the promulgation of the indulgence ; and of 
Brother Oddo, and others. 

As to what M. Sabatier styles the "popular" witness to the indul 
gence that is, its story as handed down on the lips of the people we 
have an example in the statement attributed to a " Michaelo Bernardi, 
formerly of Spello ". According to this statement Michaelo Bernardi 
heard the story of the indulgence one day when he visited the Porziun- 
cola and found there Peter Cathanii and others of the saints companions 
talking amongst themselves about the granting of the indulgence. In 
this statement we find details which are lacking in the official evidence, 
and which at first sight are in contradiction with it. Thus in the official 
evidence it is stated that the Pope was at Perugia when Francis went 
to him ; in the statement of Michaelo Bernardi, Francis goes to Rome 
to see the Pope. Again, Michaelo Bernardi makes Christ himself fix 
the second day of August for the gaining of the indulgence ; and his 
narrative is adorned with picturesque details, e.g. of the miraculous 
roses. Bernardi s statement was incorporated in the diploma of Bishop 
Conrad of Assisi, published in 1335. M. Sabatier and Pere Gratien 
entirely reject this story as a work of popular imagination creating its 
own beliefs. Papini (Storia di San Francesco, n. p. 242) had already 
questioned whether Michaelo Bernardi had even existed ; but Spader 
(quoted by Sabatier, op. cit. p. Lxxxviii, note 1), asserts that a Pietro 
Bernardi was a member of the Cancelleria of Assisi in 1228, and that in 
1360 members of the family were still living in Spello. 

That Bernardi s statement manifests a love of the marvellous none 
will deny. But it is not to be put aside too lightly. In some respects it 
is consistent with known historical facts. It speaks of Francis taking 
Peter Cathanii to Rome in the month of January. Honorius certainly was 
in Rome in January, both in 1217 and in 1221. (Cf. Pressutti, Reg. 
Hon. m. pp. 38 and 485) ; Peter Cathanii did not die till 10 March, 1221. 
Hence those who accept Bernardi s statement hold that it refers not to the 
original grant of the indulgence made at Perugia in 1216 ; but to a second 
journey undertaken either in January, 1217 or 1221, to get the Pope to 
determine a definite day for the indulgence, which had not yet been fixed. 



408 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSISI 

(Of. P. Panfilo, Storia di S. Fran. i. p. 331.) The Chron. xxiv. Gen. 
(Anal. Franc, in. p. 29) dates the grant of the indulgence in 1221. 
Wadding follows this date for the original grant, but mentions a second 
journey in 1223. There may indeed be a substratum of historical truth 
in Bernardi s recital : but that is the most that can be said for it. 

We must now take note of another class of evidence what one may 
call the undesigned evidence left by witnesses who had no intention of 
giving evidence, but who merely mention the indulgence as a matter of 
fact. Evidence of this sort is all the more convincing simply because it 
is unintentional. We have two instances of the kind. 

In 1280 the Minister-General Bonagrazia forbade the friars to receive 
offerings of money in the church of the Porziuncola on the day of the 
indulgence : * and this witness is the more important because Bonagrazia 
was an opponent of the Spirituals and would not have tolerated any 
doubtful privilege which tended to exalt the Porziuncola over the basilica 
of San Francesco, which was, so to speak, the camp of the party of the 
Community in the Order. We may take it, therefore, that the indulgence 
must have been well established by 1280. 

The second instance is the statement of Ubertino da Casale in the 
first prologue to his first book of the Arbor Vitce, to the effect that he 
himself visited the Porziuncola on 2 August, 1284, or 1285, to gain the 
indulgence. 

In the face of this "undesigned" evidence it is difficult to follow the 
contention of Dr. Kirsch (Der Portiuncula Ablass in Theol. Quartal- 
schriftj 1906, 1 and 2) that the indulgence was concocted by the Spirituals 
between 1288 and 1295. Whatever may be said as to the origin of the 
indulgence, it was clearly drawing pilgrims to the Porziuncola in 1280 and 
was then a well-established event, and Dr. Kirsch s theory that the in 
dulgence was concocted by the Spirituals between 1288 and 1295 falls 
to the ground. 

But what about the "official" evidence ? for, of course, the authen 
ticity of the attribution of the indulgence depends chiefly upon that. 

Dr. Kirsch and Joh. Joergensen consider the " attestations of 1277 " 
to be a mere forgery penned at or after the time that the Spirituals, as 
they contend, were striving to foist the indulgence upon the conscience 
of Christendom. They object in the first place that the original docu 
ment of the attestations has yet to be found ; and in the .second place 
they appeal to the internal witness of the attestations themselves for 
their own condemnation. 

Now it is quite true that the original document of the attestations is 
unknown ; but the attestation of Benedict of Arezzo exists in an authentic 
document of the thirteenth century and in another document the date of 
which is more uncertain but which nevertheless is not later than the be- 

1 Anal. Franc, in. p. 373. 



APPENDIX II 409 

ginning of the fourteenth century. 1 Bishop Theobald refers explicitly 
to the attestations in his diploma of 1310. The objection on the score 
of the disappearance of the original document is not one to be pressed 
too far, else it would reduce all history into a very small compass. What 
purported to be copies of the attestations were certainly known before 
the end of the thirteenth century and in the beginning of the four 
teenth. 

Of greater weight would be any objections established from the 
internal testimony of the documents themselves. 

Of all the attestations three are of first importance, as giving us 
original details of the story of the indulgence the attestations of 
Benedict and Rainerio of Arezzo, of Pietro Zalfani, and of Giacomo 
Coppoli. 

Dr. Kirsch objects to the attestation of Benedict and Rainerio of 
Arezzo, that they profess to have received the story of the indulgence 
from Brother Masseo, the companion of St. Francis. Accepting the 
statement of Wadding that this Brother Masseo died in 1280, Dr. Kirsch 
asks why Brother Masseo himself was not called as a witness in 1277 ? 
Dr. Kirsch ought surely to have known that Wadding s dates are un 
reliable, and in fact it has been proved that the Masseo who died in 
1280 was another religious of that name and not the saint s companion. 2 
But Joergensen objects that Benedict of Arezzo was a man given to 
seeing the marvellous, and therefore altogether unreliable as a witness. 
He bases this statement upon the biography of the friar written by one, 
Naiines, in 1302, in which the most extraordinary events are chronicled. 3 
But one may well ask how far the description of these marvels is to be 
attributed to Benedict himself and how far to an imaginative biographer ? 
Authentic accounts of Benedict of Arezzo show him to have been a 
trusted counsellor in the affairs of the Order. He filled the office of 
Minister-Provincial for thirty years, from 1217 to 1239. And the 
account he gives in his attestation is^purely matter-of-fact and without 
any indication of the marvellous. 

As to the attestation of Zalfani, Joergensen rejects it on the ground 
that Zalfani says St. Francis held a paper in his hand when he was 
announcing the indulgence. "Without doubt," says Joergensen, "in 
the mind of the old man that paper was the papal bull ; though [he adds] 
they tell us that Francis obstinately refused to accept one. " But what 
ever may have been in the mind of Zalfani, he certainly does not say 
that it was a papal bull : that it is only Joergensen s reading of Zalfani s 
mind ! 

1 Of. M. Sabatier ; Bartholi, pp. xliv-xlix; P. Holzapfel in Archiv. Franc. 
Hist. an. i. fasc. i. p. 38. 

2 Of. P. Lemmens, Catalogus S. Fratrum Minorum, p. 6. 

3 Of. P. Golubovich, Biblioteca, i. pp. 129-48; Ada SS. Augusti, vi. p. 
808-11. 



410 LIFE OF ST. FEANCIS OF ASSISI 

Both Kirsch and Joergensen reject the evidence of Giacorao Coppoli 
on the ground that it contradicts the attestation of Zalfani. In Coppoli s 
attestation St. Francis, after relating the story of the indulgence to 
Brother Leo, is said to have told him: "Keep this a secret until the 
day of my death ". But how could Francis have; bidden Leo keep the 
indulgence a secret if it was already promulgated in the presence of 
seven bishops ? 

This objection surely strains at mere words. The explanation I have 
given in the text (p. 195) is perfectly natural, that it was in face of the 
continued and growing opposition that Francis afterwards inculcated 
silence on his companions. 1 

In fact the attestations have two strong points in their favour : they 
are quite simple and matter-of-fact in tone : whilst giving separate sup 
plementary details, they are in no wise contradictory of each other and 
it may be added, they in no wise contradict the story of St. Francis as it 
is authentically known to us. 

Taking the evidence, then, as it stands, we find that the indulgence 
was well-established in 1280 and that the " official " attestations bear the 
marks of credibility. 

But there is yet another question to be considered. Would the 
Holy See have allowed the indulgence to stand if there were not some 
strong tradition to sanction it ? It must be remembered that about 1280 
and for some years afterwards there was clamorous opposition to the indul 
gence on the part of the clergy at large. Moreover inside the Franciscan 
Order there was the strife between the Friars of the Community who 
regarded the Sagro Convento as the mother-house of the Order, and the 
Spirituals who gave that title to the Poiziuncola. In 1288 Pope Nicholas 
IV granted indulgences for visiting the basilica of the Sacro Convento on 
its dedication- day. Would he have allowed the Porziuncola indulgence 
to stand without a new and special grant had it been only newly heard of ? 
We know how in 1296 Boniface VIII revoked a similar indulgence granted 
by his predecessor to the church of Collemaggio ; would he have allowed 
the Porziuncola indulgence to continue in spite of the opposition to it, if 
there were any doubt that it was already long established and authentic ? 

The toleration of the indulgence by the Holy See towards the end of 
the thirteenth century suggests that the indulgence must have been long 
in existence and that its authenticity was then unquestioned by the high 
est authority. 

In short, the rejection of the authenticity of the indulgence raises 
questions as difficult to answer as does its acceptance. 

1 1 pass over the objection raised on the score that according to Coppoli 
Francis bade Leo keep the secret until liis (Leo s) death. It is based on the 
reading of one of the MSS: " usque ad mortem tuam". But the MS. of 
Florence and that of Volterra have : " usque ad diem mortis mcca ". 



APPENDIX II 411 

BIBLIOGRAPHY. 

(1) P. Sabatier : Fr. Bartholi, Tractatus de Indulgentia S. Maria de 

Portiuncula : Cf. De testimonio B. Benedicti de Aretio in Arch. 
Franc. Hist. an. iv. fasc. in. 

(2) Against the authenticity : 

Dr. Anton Kirsch : Der Portionkula-Ablass in Theol. Quartal- 
schrift, 1906, i. and n. ; Job. Joergensen : Saint Francois 
d Assise, livre in. chap. in. (Cf. ibid. Appendix I, written 
for the French edition, in which the author modifies his 
conclusions. In the English translation which has come to 
hand whilst this book was in the press, I find that Joergen 
sen has re-written his chapter on the indulgence and now 
admits the authenticity.) Van Ortroy, S.J., in Anal. 
Bolland. xxvi. p. 140. 

(3) For the, authenticity : 

P. Sabatier : Un nouveau chapitre de la Vie de S. Frangois ; 
Pere Gratien, O.M. Cap. in Etudes Franciscaines, torn, 
xvin. p. 478 seq. Mgr. Faloci Pulignani : Gli storici 
deir Indulgenza della Porziuncula in Misc. Franc, vol. 
x. p. 65 seq. P. Holzapfel, O.F.M. : Entstehung des Por- 
tiuncula-Ablesses in Archiv. Franc. Hist. an. i. fas. i. p. 
31 seq. P. Rene, O.M. Cap. : L Indulgence de la Por 
tiuncula, in Jfitudes Franciscaines, tome xx. p. 337 seq. 
Dr. Alf. Fiereus : De geschied Kundige oorsprong van den 
aflaat van Portiunkula. 



APPENDIX III. 
THE RULE OF THE THIRD ORDER. 

THE earliest copy of the Rule of the Third Order at present known to us 
dates only from 30 March, 1228, seven years, that is, after the institution 
of the Brothers of Penance. This copy was discovered a few years since 
amongst the documents of the Franciscan friary of Capestrano in the 
Abruzzi, by Prof. Vincenzo de Bartholomaeis and edited by M. Paul 
Sabatier in Opuscules de Critique Historique, torn. I. fasc. I. under the 
title Regula Antiqua Fratrum et Sororum de Pcenitentia. 

M. Sabatier does not regard this Capestrano Rule as the original 
Rule of the Third Order. According to him the first twelve chapters had 
their origin shortly after the death of St. Francis ; and the thirteenth 
chapter, about 1230. 1 It holds the same relationship, he thinks, to the 
original Rule of the Penitents as the Rule of 1223 holds to the primitive 
Rule of the Friars Minor. 2 P. Mandonnet, O.P., on the other hand, 
holds that the Capestrano Rule, with the exception of the thirteenth 
chapter, is the original Rule of 1221. ;J Yet again, Boehmer in his collec 
tion of the writings of St. Francis, ranks this Rule amongst the "spuri 
ous " works ; 4 whilst W. Goetz holds that it is a mere mosaic of legislative 
documents. 5 

To me it seems that the first twelve chapters of the Capestrano Rule 6 
are a revision of the original Rule, made shortly after Ugolino s elevation 
to the Papal throne, and that the revision represents the substitution as 
the dominant principle in the fraternity, of the prohibition to take the 
feud-oath in place of the renunciation of superfluous wealth. 

From the beginning the prohibition of the feud-oath was a leading 

1 Regula Antiqua, pp. 10-11. *ibid. p. 10, note 2. 

3 Les Regies et le Gouvernement deVOrdo de Pcenitentia an xm e siecle 
Opuscules de Critique Hist. torn. I. fasc. iv. 

4 Analekten, p. 73. 

5 Die Regel des Tertiarierordens, in Zeitschrift fur Kircliengeschichte, vol. 
xxin. p. 97 seq. 

6 The thirteenth chapter of the Capestrano Rule is manifestly a collection of 
local statutes added on to the original text. Such statutes would correspond 
to the decrees of the chapters amongst the Friars Minor, and not unlikely were 
the actual decrees of chapters held by the Penitents. 

412 



APPENDIX III 413 

idea in the formation of the fraternity, and undoubtedly the prohibition 
was in accord with the mind of Francis. But whereas Francis thought 
chiefly of the moral causes of the feud-spirit, namely avarice and secular 
ambition, and was intent upon developing both love of God and of man by 
means of evangelical poverty, Ugolino, with a statesman s instinct, looked 
directly to the legal means by which the feud-spirit might be combated. 
Ugolino s conception, in other words, was that of a religious corporation 
protected by the Church in its refusal to undertake the oath and military 
service, whilst Francis saw in the fraternity a spiritual family bound 
together in a love of evangelical poverty and in evangelical charity. 

In all probability the original Rule approximated more nearly to that 
of the Humiliati than does the Capestrano Rule, inasmuch as there is 
reason to believe that it contained the ordinances concerning the distri 
bution of superfluous income and also the admonitions concerning 
conjugal chastity. As we have seen, the practice of the first Franciscan 
tertiaries was to distribute the wealth which they did not require for 
their own modest needs ; for Ugolino himself, as Gregory IX, on 30 
March, 1228, issued the bull " Detestanda," in which he forbade the 
penitents from being hindered in this practice by the secular author 
ities. 1 And as regarding the precept concerning conjugal chastity, it is 
noteworthy that the Penitents were also known as " Continentes," "the 
continent," which shows that they made a special profession of chastity, 
even as the Humiliati did. 2 

It would be interesting were we able to determine precisely the 
motives which induced Ugolino to delete these regulations from the 
Rule, supposing them to have really formed part of the original Rule. In 
the absence of documentary evidence we can only fall back upon con 
jecture. It is possible that, as the tertiaries increased in numbers and 
came to take in a very large section of the community, the practice 
of an annual distribution of superfluous wealth may have tended to pro 
duce economic results which in the opinion of the Holy See, as well as of 
the civic authorities, may have been injurious to the common welfare. It 

1 Vide supra, p. 287. 

2 Ordo Continentium is a style frequently used in public documents to de 
signate the tertiaries. (Of. Sbaralea, Bullar. i. p. 99, note f.) One of St. 
Francis nephews is described as " Picardus Continens " ; i.e. Picardo, of the 
Third Order, is an ancient genealogy given by Ant. Cristofani, in Delle Storie 
[ed. 1902], p. 51. Of. also Bartholi, Tract, de Indulgentia [ed. Sabatier], pp. 
70, 86 ; also Fioretti, in. Consid. delle Stim. A religious community of tertiary 
sisters was existing in Germany in 1233 under the title of " Virgines Contin 
entes " (Sbaralea, ibid. p. 108). The appellation must have had reference 
directly to conjugal chastity, considering that it was chiefly for married 
persons that the fraternity was instituted : but it not unfrequently happened 
that married penitents mutually consented to live according to the evangeli 
cal council. A case of this sort is mentioned in II Celano, 38. 



414 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSIST 

would undoubtedly interfere with the industrial development of the 
State, and that was a matter of much concern to the Italian communes in 
the thirteenth century, whose very independence rested upon industrial 
prosperity. Ugolino therefore may well have considered that on this point 
the magistrates and governors had a legitimate grievance. It would be dif 
ferent were the tertiaries comparatively few in number : then their action 
would not greatly affect the State : but in some places the greater part of 
the citizens became tertiaries and then their withdrawal from industrial 
enterprise would undoubtedly be a set-back to the commune. 

As to the law of conjugal chastity, Ugolino may have considered that 
the common precept of the Gospel in this matter was sufficient, and that a 
special precept in the Rule of the Penitents might tend to foster a practice 
which if it became widespread, would frustrate the very object of Christian 
marriage. We know that there was a tendency amongst married penitents 
to bind themselves by mutual agreement to live as brother and sister. Such 
a practice when confined to the few, doubtless had a good effect upon the 
community in the way of self-restraint and regard for purity : but if such 
a practice became general it would lead to obvious moral and social dan 
gers. Moreover in the actual condition of Italy, seeing how the peninsula 3 
especially in the central and northern provinces, was inoculated with the 
tenets of the Cathari and Patarini, there was a danger lest amongst the 
common people, the practice of distributing superfluous wealth and of 
renouncing marriage rights, might develop into the communism and the 
Manichean view of marriage, preached by the heretics. This danger 
became imminent since the Third Order was thrown wide open to all 
Catholics of whatever rank or condition. 

Such reasons might well have led Ugolino to revise the Rule l in the 
direction of concentrating the corporate purpose of the fraternity upon a 
matter which could be more directly supervised by the ecclesiastical au 
thorities and which was of vital concern to the papal policy, namely the 
suppression of the claim of the secular authority to enforce military 
service in pursuance of civic feuds or against the Church. 

On the other hand, the regulations concerning dress, food and the 
religious exercises of the Penitents found in the Capestrano Rule are 
probably derived from the original Rule. They are evidently based upon 
the Rule of the Humiliati. 

As to the government of the fraternity, the Capestrano Rule implies 

1 A statement in Annales Wormatienses (Mon. Germ. Script, torn. xvn. 
p. 75) merits attention. Under the year 1227 appears this passage : <- Ordo 
Pcenitentium eodem anno a papa confirmatur " . If this could be taken as au 
thentic evidence one might suppose that in that year the revision of the Rule 
was made with a view to a more solemn approbation by the Holy See. But 
the Annales Wormatienses are not always exact. Thus under the year 1208 
we find : *" Eodem anno incepit ordo Fratrum Minorum ET PR^DICATORUM ". 



APPENDIX III 415 

that the Penitents are governed by their own ministers, 1 but under the 
judicial supervision of a visitor whose duty it is to correct abuses and 
punish delinquents. The visitor has the power to dispense the brethren 
from particular observances of the Rule in cases of necessity, and also to 
expel recalcitrant members. 2 It is not said in the Rule that the visitor, 
shall be a Friar Minor ; though one of the additional statutes ordains 
that "the visitor and ministers of this fraternity shall ask the minister or 
custos of the Friars Minor for a Friar Minor from the convent, and that 
this fraternity be governed and ruled by the advice of this friar and by 
the will of the friars ". 

Now according to Bernard de Besse the Penitents in the beginning 
had Friars Minor as their ministers and only later on chose their minis 
ters from their own body. 3 P. Mandonnet argues that the period when 
the Penitents were under the jurisdiction of Friars Minor as their minis 
ters, was before 1221 ; and this is indeed one of his grounds for asserting 
that before that year the friars and the penitents formed one organic fra 
ternity. 4 But this argument is based upon the assumption that the 
Capestrano Rule is that of 1221. As a matter of fact we have no evidence 
to show whether the ministers of the Penitents before 1228 were chosen 
from the friars or from the Penitents themselves, except the evidence of 
Bernard de Besse. 

But the additional statute to the Capestrano Rule to which we have 
just referred shows that in 1228, although the Penitents had their local 
ministers chosen from their own body, they were yet "governed and 
ruled by the advice " of the Friars Minor appointed to advise them, and 
"by the will of the Friars Minor" corporately. It would seem from 
this that the Penitents were claiming the right to be under the jurisdic 
tion of the Friars Minor, just as St. Clare was claiming this right for the 
Poor Ladies, and that this right was admitted at least in practice at the 
time the statute was made. 

In 1234 however the Penitents were placed under the jurisdiction of 
the bishops * quatenus ad visitationem et correctionem eorum ". 5 Never 
theless the Penitents still asserted their claim to be governed by the 
friars ; for St. Bonaventure refused to exercise jurisdiction over them 
or to be concerned with their government. G Yet even as late as 1287 it 
seems that the ministers of the friars were also at times ministers of the 
Penitents. 7 In fact it was not until 1290 that the question of govern - 

1 Cf. capp. 7, 8, 10, 12. 2 C f. cap. 12. 

3 Cf. Lib. de Laud. (op. cit. p. 76). *Les Rtgks, p. 178 seq. 

s Vide bull " Ut cum majori" of 21 November, 1284. Sbaralea, Bull. i. 
p. 142. 

6 Cf. S. Bonaventurae, Determinationes, pars, ii Qusest. 16. Opera Omnia 
(Quaracchi) vm. p. 368. 

7 See the letter of John Boccamazzi written to the guardians of the Friars 
Minor at Strasburg and other places, quoted by Mandonnet, op. cit. p. 180, 
note 2. 



416 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

ment was finally settled. In 1289, Nicholas IV had again revised the Rule 
of the Penitents l and ordained that they should choose ministers from 
their own body and that the visitor should be any approved religious, not 
necessarily a Friar Minor. But the Penitents vehemently protested, and 
in 1290 Nicholas ordained that the visitor must be a Friar Minor. 2 Still, 
the ministers, both local and provincial, of the Penitents were chosen from 
amongst themselves : 3 and except for the visitation, were no longer under 
the effective government of the friars. It is not improbable therefore that 
Bernard de Besse in stating that the Penitents "in the beginning" 
were governed by a friar as minister, is referring to a period as late as 
1234 when the fraternity of the Penitents was "governed and ruled by 
the advice " of a Friar Minor and " by the will of the Friars Minor". 
The question of the government and development of the Third Order 
is however full of difficulties and yet awaits an exhaustive critical 
treatment. 

1 Vide Sbaralea, Bull. i. pp. 94-7 ; Seraph. Legislat. Textus, pp. 77-96. 

2 Vide bull " Unigenitus Dei Filius " of 8 August, 1290 (Sbaralea, ibid. pp. 
167-8). 

3 Of. Gli Statuti di una antica congregatione Francescana di Brescia, in 
Arch. Franc. Hist. an. i. fasc. iv. pp. 540-68 ; also, Ada et Statuta Generalis 
Capituli Tertii Ordinis . . . Bononice celebrates an. 1289, in Arch. Franc. Hist. 
an. ii. fasc. i. pp. 63-71. 



APPENDIX IV. 
THE SOURCES OF OUR KNOWLEDGE OF ST. FRANCIS. 

"THERE are few lives in history so well documented as that of Saint 
Francis," wrote M. Paul Sabatier in 1894. l With still more truth might 
the same be said to-day. For during the last seventeen years, a number 
of documents have been brought to light, some of them of the first im 
portance. One document of primary value, of which all traces had been 
lost, has been discovered, namely the Tractatus de Miraculis, by Thomas of 
Celano ; other documents hidden away in uncatalogued libraries and un 
known to students have been recovered, such as the Capestrano Rule of 
the Third Order, and the treaty of peace between Perugia and Assisi in 
1203. 

Critical research has moreover shown the existence of early documents 
which remain only as parts of later compilations, as in the case of the 
Speculum Perfectionis ; it has forced students to revise their judgment 
and acknowledge a greater value in some received works, e.g. the Fioretti, 
and the Liber Conformitatum by Bartholomew of Pisa ; further it has 
given recognition to many hitherto neglected works such as Bartholi s 
Tractatus de Indulgentia S. M. de Portiuncula, the Sacrum Commercium 
S. Francisci cum Domina Paupertate ; and finally it has resulted in the 
recovery of more authentic texts of works already published, as e.g. the 
Opuscula of St. Francis, the First and Second Legends of Thomas of 
Celano, the Legend of St. Clare, the Anonymus Perusinus, Eccleston s 
Chronicle De Adventu FF. Minorum in Angliam ". 

Every year, almost, has seen the appearance of some new document 
or text : nor, it would seem, are the recoveries yet exhausted. The legend 
Quasi stella attributed to John of Ceperano has yet to be found ; so too 
is it with the original rotuli of Brother Leo, and some letters of St. 
Francis. We have not yet got a definite text of the Vita Fratris Aegidii 
written by Brother Leo. Research is still eager for the original Fioretti, 
and for fuller authentic information concerning St. Francis pilgrimage 
in Palestine and his visit to Spain. 

Whilst it must be admitted that the discoveries already made have 
brought to light but few facts arid sayings which have not been in some 
way recognized in the hitherto accepted story of the saint, nevertheless 

1 Vie de St. Franqois, p. xxxiii. 

417 27 



418 LIFE OF ST. FEANCIS OF ASSISI 

we are now in a better position to obtain a true historical perception of 
the saint s character and deeds, and of the purpose and achievement of 
his life. Mere facts are but the alphabet of authentic history : it is in 
the right concatenation of facts that we get the authentic word of history. 
But for this true spelling several conditions are imperative : not only 
must we know the external circumstances of time and place and associa 
tion into which the fact or saying is born : we need to know also the 
character and temperament, the mental atmosphere and moral outlook 
from which a man s actions and words are derived ; and this is generally 
the more difficult thing to attain to. 

Now the results of critical research into the sources of Franciscan his 
tory have certainly enabled us to place the facts of St. Francis life and his 
words, in a more authentic setting in regard to the external circumstances 
to which they belong, as well as to judge in many instances with more or 
less assurance of matters which have given the critics food for debate. 
But more than that, with the recovery and authentication of many docu 
ments, we are able more closely to follow the workings of the saint s 
mind and of the minds of his associates. The Speculum Perfectionis which 
is largely derived from the saint s own companions, brings one into the 
very atmosphere which surrounded the saint s later years ; whilst the 
larger assurance with which we can now accept the Fioretti and other 
later compilations substantially increases our power of steady vision. 

Curiously enough it seems to me the wider our knowledge of the 
sources of the Franciscan story becomes, the more accurate appears that 
traditional estimate of Francis, which has been kept sacred in the people s 
mind through all the ages since he lived. Biographers who have sought 
to explain the Francis of the early legends have too frequently succeeded 
only in distorting the proportions of his life and in writing around the 
bare facts of his story, a thesis which has but a stranger s claim upon the 
tolerance of the spirit of the early legends. But popular tradition has 
been more tenacious of that spirit ; and now our fuller knowledge of the 
early legends is bringing us critically into the company of the popular 
tradition ; only with a more accurate appreciation of the values of the 
material out of which the traditional figure has been woven. 

x- 

-X- 

The sources of our knowledge of St. Francis fall into four main 
divisions : 

(1) The saint s writings ; 

(2) The documents left by the biographers of the saint and the 
chroniclers of the Order ; 

(3) The writings of others who did not professedly deal with the 
history of the Franciscan Order ; 

(4) Diplomatic and legal documents. 



APPENDIX IV 419 

I. 

THE WRITINGS or THE SAINT. 

These have been handed down in two sets of codices, representing, as 
some think, two distinct traditions, Conventual and Observant ; l the " Con 
ventual " codices are chiefly the Assisi MS. 388, and those contained in 
the Fac secundum exemplar compilations ; 2 typical of the " Observant " 
codices is the Ognissanti MS. The writings as contained in the first set 
were practically reproduced in the Chronicle of Mariano of Florence, 
whilst the Conformities of Bartholomew of Pisa gives them in the order 
of the second set. Wadding published in 1623 an edition of the writ 
ings, 3 in which he included not only dicta of the saint extracted from the 
legends, and which in form are certainly not authentic, but also other 
matter, such as the canticle, Amor di Caritate, which both in substance 
and form belongs to other authors. From Wadding s time until quite 
recent years the editors and translators of the " Works of St. Francis " 
merely reproduced Wadding. But in 1904 the Franciscans of Quaracchi 
published a new critical edition. 4 In the same year H. Boehmer pub 
lished his critical study of the Opuscula," and W. Goetz republished with 
some emendations his valuable examination of the writings 6 which had 
already appeared in the Zeitschrift fur Kirchengeschichte. In 1906 a criti 
cal English translation of the Opuscula was published by Father Paschal 
Robinson, O.F.M. 7 

As a result of critical research the following writings are more or less 
generally accepted as authentic : 

1. The two Rules of the Friars Minor of 1221 and 1223. 

2. The Testament. 

3. The Forma Vivendi inserted in the Rule of St. Clare. 

4. The regulations De religiosa habitatione in eremo and De reverentia 
Corporis Christi. 

1 Sabatier : " Les Opuscules de Saint Francois " in Opuscules de Critique 
Hist. fasc. x. pp. 133-4. Of. Fr. Paschal Eobinson, O.F.M. , Writings of St. 
Francis, p. xviii. 2 Vide infra, p. 437. 

3 B. P. Francisci Assisiatis Opuscula. Portions of the writings had already 
been printed in the Speculum Vitce and the Firmamentum trium Ordinum. 

4 Opuscula Sancti Patris Francisci Assisiensis (Quaracchi). 

5 Analekten zur Geschichte des Franciscus von Assisi (Tubingen). 

6 Die Quellen zur Geschichte des hi. Franciscus von Assisi (Gotha). 

7 The Writings of St. Francis. (Philadelphia, U.S.A.) The translation is 
enriched with many original critical notes, and besides the Latin works con 
tained in the Quaracchi edition, includes the " Canticle of the Sun ". Other 
critical studies of the writings are : Les Opuscules de Saint Francois, by P. 
Sabatier (a critical examination of the works of the Quaracchi editors, Boehmer 
and Goetz), and Les Opuscules de Saint Francois d Assise, by Pere Ubald 
d Alencon, O.M.Cap. 

27 * 



420 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

5. The Admonitions Verba Admonitionis. 

6. The chartula given to Brother Leo. 

7. Six letters. 

8. Some prayers. 

9. The Canticle of the Sun. 

The authenticity of the two Rules of the Friars Minor is unquestioned. 
Their history is set forth in the body of this book and need not detain us 
here. Neither is there any doubt in regard to the Forma Vivendi inserted 
in the Rule of the Poor Clares, since we have it on the authority of St. 
Clare herself that this Forma was written for her and the sisters by the 
saint. 1 

The Testament is well authenticated both by Thomas of Celano 2 and 
the bull " Quo elongati " of Gregory IX, 3 as well as by the Leg. 3 Soc. 4 and 
St. Bonaventure. 5 

The short document De religiosa habitatione in eremo 6 is certainly 
one of the most precious of Franciscan monuments. It sets forth the 
manner of life to be lived by the brethren in the small hermitages which 
were so numerous in the early days of the Order. The exact date of its 
composition is unknown ; but it could hardly have been written after 
1219, when the Order began to be organized on more conventional lines. 

The exhortation De reverentia Corporis Christi 7 was written in the 
last years of the saint s life. The Speculum Perfectionis speaks of a regula 
tion St. Francis wished to insert in the Rule concerning the care the friars 
should have for the Blessed Sacrament, "and although," it adds, "these 
things are not written in the Rule because the Ministers did not think it 
well that the brethren should be obliged to these things by obedience, 
nevertheless he willed to leave the brethren a record of his intention both 
in his Testament and in his other writings ". 8 We have in this exhortation 
one of the writings in which the saint thus expressed his will. 9 It is a 
touching monument of St. Francis devotion to the Sacrament of the 
Altar. 

The Admonitions Verba Admonitionis 10 are accepted as authentic 

i Of. Reg. S. Clara, cap. vi. ; cf . Fr. Paschal Robinson, The Rule of St. 
Clare, p. 11. 

2 Cf. I. Celano, 17. Vide Joergensen, Saint Francois, Introd. p. xxxi, 
note 2. 

3 Sbaralea, Bull. i. p. 68 seq. 4 Leg. 3 Soc. 29. 

5 Leg. Maj. in. 2. 6 Opuscula, p. 83 ; Boehmer, Analekten, p. 67. 

7 Opriscula, p. 22 ; Boehrner, loc. cit. p. 62. 8 Cap. 65. 

9 Wadding includes this document amongst the Letters (Letter 13). He 
adds an opening salutation ; To my reverend masters in Christ, to all clerics, 
etc. Sabatier (Speculum Perfect, p. clxvi) thinks it to be a postscript to the 
letter " To a certain Minister ". 

10 Opuscula S. F. Francisci (Quaracchi), pp. 3-19 ; The Writings ofS. Fran 
cis, translated by Fr. Paschal Robinson, O.F.M. pp. 3-19 ; Boehmer, Analekten, 
pp. 40-8. 



APPENDIX IV 421 

by all the critics. 1 Joergensen suggests that they were set forth by 
Francis at the Chapters of Pentecost, and were the first additions made 
to the primitive Rule. The suggestion is plausible, and might account for 
the special care and reverence with which they are preserved. Yet there 
are difficulties in the way of accepting this opinion in regard to the whole 
series. The Admonition " Of Perfect and Imperfect Obedience" (No. 3), 
for example, bears evidence that it was written after Francis return from 
the East, when the troubles in the Order had began. 2 The same might 
be said of the fifth, sixth, and seventh Admonitions. :J But whatever 
were the circumstances of their origin, these words of admonition were 
undoubtedly frequently on the lips of Francis. 4 They were his " Sermon 
on the Mount ". 

Of seventeen letters attributed to the saint by Wadding, only six are 
admitted as indubitably authentic by the Quaracchi editors : namely, the 
letters "To all the Faithful," "To all the Brethren," "To a certain 
Minister," "To the Rulers of Peoples," "To all Custodes," and "To 
Brother Leo". 5 They also admit the substantial authenticity of the 
well-known letter to St. Anthony, but are doubtful as to its form. 6 
Boehmer accepts only five of the Quaracchi letters as beyond any 
doubt, and puts the letter " To the Rulers," as well as that to St. Anthony 
amongst the "doubtful writings". 7 Goetz, on the other hand, accepts 
both letters, 8 but holds the letter "To all Custodes" as doubtful. All 
three letters are certainly conformable to the style of thought and speech 
manifested in other authentic writings of the saint ; and bear the mark 
of his personality. Francis seems to have been no niggard in the matter 
of writing letters : the letters we now have are but a few of those he is 
known to have written. 9 

1 Goetz, Quellen zur Geschichte des hi. Franz von Assist, in Zeitsch. filr 
Kirchengescht. xxn. p. 551 ; Joergensen, loc. cit. p. 324 ; Van Ortroy, Anal. 
Boll. xxiv. fasc. in. p. 411. 

2 Vide supra, p. 315. 

3 1 am quoting the numbers given in the Quaracchi edition of the 
Opuscula. 

4 St. Bonavenfcure quoting from Admonition 20, says : " This word he had 
continually in his mouth " (Leg. Maj. vi. 1). Again he prefaces a saying of 
St. Francis similar to Admonition 28, thus : " He would often say to his com 
panions such words as these " (Leg. Maj. x. 4). In Admonition 5 we have 
another version of the Parable of Perfect Joy related in the Fiorettii, cap. 
vni. Similar parallels are e.g. Admon. 4 = llegula i. cap. vi. ; Adrnon. 6 = 
Spec. Perfect, cap. 4. Regula i. cap. xvn. ; Admon. 26 = Testament (con 
cerning the honour due to priests) ; I Celano, 62. 

5 Opuscula, pp. 87-116. 6 Opuscula, p. 179. 

7 Analekten, pp. 70-1. 8 Quellen, loc. cit. p. 535, and pp. 528-64. 

9 " Plura scripta tradidit nobis," says St. Clare in her Testament. 
Eccleston speaks of a letter written to the friars in France (De Adventu 



422 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSISI 

The prayers of St. Francis generally received as authentic are the 
Praises, the Salutations of the Virtues and of the Blessed Virgin, the 
Praises of God, and the Office of the Passion. The Quaracchi editors also 
include a prayer to obtain Divine Love. The, Praises Laudes are a 
paraphrase of the Our Father in the mediaeval style, 1 together with 
an extended doxology. This prayer is evidently referred to in the 
Speculum Perfectionis,* from which it would seem that the Praises were 
frequently recited by St. Francis and the brethren. It is not unlikely 
that it was this prayer which the saint ordered the brethren in France to 
recite. 3 

The " Salutation of the Blessed Virgin " and the "Salutation of the 
Virtues " form one prayer of praise in some of the ancient MSS ; though 
in others they are disjoined. 4 Thomas of Celano textually quotes the 
" Salutation of the Virtues ". 5 If we may take it, as the rubric in certain 
codices describe it, namely as a praise "of the virtues with which the 
Blessed Virgin was adorned and which should adorn the holy soul," the 
salutation is another instance of St. Francis habit of looking for a con 
crete embodiment of his ideals. For him the merely abstract had no 
attraction except as it was realized in some living reality to which he 
could give his heart. The Praises of God is the prayer of praise written 
by the saint on Mount Alvernia after he had received the stigmata. 6 

An Office, of the Passion is mentioned in the Legend of St. Clare, as 
having been composed by St. Francis ; and the Quaracchi editors 
consider that the office given in several ancient MSS. is that referred 
to. Boehmer altogether omits it from his collection. Yet it bears 
a striking similarity of construction to the Laudes Dei, the " Praises of 
God". The psalms, so styled, are a string of passages gathered from 
various psalms and other parts of Scripture, illustrative of a single idea 
or motive. For example : the ordinary " psalm " for prime is a song of 
trust in God s mercy ; the Easter matins " psalm" is a canticle of joy in 
the mystery of the Resurrection. The Christmas vespers "psalm" is 
however a gem of the purest Franciscan water, and hardly anyone but 
Francis could have written it. 7 

ed. Little, p. 40), and of another written to the friars at Bologna (ibid.). 
Letters to Cardinal Ugolino are mentioned in I Celano, 82, and in the Leg. 3 
Soc. 67. 

1 Compare the paraphrases of the Kyrie, in mediaeval liturgy. 

2 Cap. 82. Cf. Sabatier, Opuscules, fasc. x. p. 137. Boehmer, however, 
classes the paraphrase of the Our Father amongst the " doubtful " writings. 

3 Eccleston, loc. cit. 

4 Cf. Boehmer, Analekten, pp. vi and xxviii ; Sabatier, Opuscules de Saint 
Francois, in Opuscules de Critique Hist. fasc. x. p. 134 ; Fr. Paschal Robinson, 
Writings of St. Francis, pp. xx and xxi. 

5 II Celano, 189. G Vide infra, p. 345. 

7 Vide Opuscula, p. 147 ; Fr. Paschal Robinson, loc. cit. p. 175. Cf . Saba 
tier, Les Opuscules, 159-60. 



APPENDIX IV 423 

All the above-mentioned writings are in Latin, but a number of poems 
in the Italian tongue have been attributed to the saint. Of these, how 
ever, only one is admitted as authentic, the " Canticle of the Sun". 1 The 
poems " Amor di caritate " included in the works of St. Francis by Wad 
ding are of later origin, perhaps by Jacopone da Todi. None of the saint s 
songs in the French tongue 2 have come down to us. 

The authentic writings of the saint which have come down to us there 
fore do not make a bulky volume ; yet they are sufficient to give us a true 
insight into the character of his mind and heart. They reveal to us a 
poet rather than a philosopher, an apostle rather than a statesman. They 
utter the intuitive knowledge of the heart and the heart s desire ; they are 
never the evenly-balanced productions of the logical thinker. Yet they give 
in brief, compendious fashion, a very complete teaching of the spiritual life 
as we find it set forth in lives of the first Franciscans recorded in the 
early legends. And for this reason the writings taken in connexion with 
the legends, are a source of primary importance for our knowledge of the 
first Franciscan days. 

II. 
THE EARLY LEGENDS AND CHRONICLES OP THE ORDER. 

These documents may be divided into four main divisions : 

1. The official biographies ; 

2. The writings of the saint s companions ; 

3. The later compilations ; 

4. The chronicles dealing professedly with the history of the Order 
rather than with the life of the saint. 

1. The Official Biographies. 

When in 1228 Gregory IX canonized St. Francis, he commanded 
Brother Thomas of Celano to write the Life of the Saint. 3 Brother 
Thomas undertook the work and produced his Legenda Prima, sometimes 
styled Legenda Gregoriana in compliment to the Pontiff who ordered it 
to be written. It was evidently finished before 25 May, 1230, since it 
contains no reference to the translation of the body of St. Francis. 4 

1 The Quaracchi Opuscula does not include this canticle, the editors 
strangely enough confining their edition to the Latin works. 

*"Altaet clara voce laudes gallice cantans" Leg. 3 Soc. 33. "Gallice 
cantabat de Domino" II Gelano, 127. 

3 The Legenda Prima was first published by the Bollandists, Ada SS. die 
4 Octobris. The Legenda, Prima and Legenda Secunda were published by 
Rinaldi in 1806; in 1880 Amoni republished Rinaldi s edition. A definite 
edition of both legends was published by P. Edouard d Alencon in 1906 
(Home, Desclee). This last edition was preceded in 1904 by Dr. Rosedale s 
unfortunate edition in which a great deal of labour seems to have been wasted 
through undue hurry. 

4 The Paris Codex says the Legenda Prima was presented to the Pope at 
Perugia on 25 February, 1229. (Of. Ed. d Alen9on, op. cit. p. xxvi). Tile- 



424 LIFE OF ST. FEANCIS OF ASSISI 

The author tells us in the prologue that he has sought to narrate 
with devotion and truth " veritate semper praevia et magistra " what 
he himself had heard from the lips of St. Francis, or what he had heard 
from truthful and approved witnesses. He divides his book into three 
parts, " lest the difference of times might bring confusion into the order 
of the incidents and so lead to doubt of their truth ". The first part is 
above all devoted to the sincerity of the saint s conversion and life, to his 
holy conduct and godly examples, together with a few miracles wrought 
by him during his lifetime. The second part concerns the last two years 
of the saint s life and his death. The third part relates certain selected 
miracles worked after death. Reference is also made to the honour shown 
to Francis by Pope Gregory in inscribing his name in the roll of the saints. 
The miracles contained in the third part, it should be noted, are those 
which are " read out and announced to the people in the presence of the 
Pope," l evidently the miracles attested in the acts of canonization. We 
must not, however, be misled by Brother Thomas anxiety not to confuse 
the order of events. The events contained in the first part happened 
before the last two years of the saint s life : and the more prominent 
events in this part are placed undoubtedly in chronological order. But 
we must not look for the same careful order in the less prominent events, 
which are often grouped together to set forth some trait in the saint s 
character. 

It has been said of the Legenda Prima that it was a manifesto in favour 
of Elias as against the party in the Franciscan Order which held by the 
primitive traditions. 2 In proof of this accusation, attention is drawn to 
the fact that Brother Thomas never once mentions by name the faithful 
companions of the saint, Leo, Ruflino, Angelo, etc., whereas he goes out 
of his way to set forth the claims of Elias to the respect of the Order, 
with the purpose, it is said, of securing his election to the office of 
General. 3 The argument proves too much more, that is to say, than we 
are warranted in concluding from the writings of Celano and our knowledge 
of him. Thomas was undoubtedly something of a courtier, so far at 
least as it came naturally to him to do homage to those whom he could put 
on pedestals. But it was an honest courtiership, not inconsistent with 
truth and sincerity. I should say that in his earlier years Thomas was 
apt to form his opinion of men by the place they held in the opinion of 

mann (Speculum Perfectionis und Leg. Trium Sociorum) throws doubt upon 
this ascription. On 21 February, 1229, Gregory IX published a letter 
concerning the saint s canonization. (Sbaralea, Bull. I. p. 49.) 

1 Vide Incipit to pars in. 

2 Sabatier, Vie de S. Frangois, p. liv. Cf. Spec. Perfect. XGVIII-CIX. 

3 Elias is mentioned by name eight times in the course of the legend. It 
must be said that M. Sabatier does not impute bad faith and conscious con 
spiracy to Thomas of Celano but regards him rather as a blind complaisant 
tool in the hands of Elias. 



APPENDIX IV 425 

the world around him. He writes of St. Clare and her religious sisters l 
with a fervent admiration which must have put their humility to the blush 
when they read his book : but then all Italy was in open admiration of 
their wonderful virtue. His naive adulation of Gregory IX is touching 
in its manifest sincerity : he is praising the protector of the Order, the 
friend of St. Francis and the brethren, as well as the Pope. 2 In similar 
fashion and with similar motive he speaks openly of Elias. Thomas of 
Celano is evidently impressed by the fact that Elias is the Vicar-General 
of the Order : and his reverence for the Vicar-General was in all proba 
bility heightened by the commanding position Elias held in the eyes of 
the Papal Court and, in fact, of all who came in contact with him. Few 
people escaped the fascination of that strange personality : 3 he was a man 
to be reckoned with, whatever office he held. But if Brother Thomas 
was outspoken in his praise of those in high position, he was not less 
generous to those who were more lowly in the world s eyes. In all his 
references to Elias he gives no such encomium of his personal virtue apart 
from his devotion to St. Francis, as he does of that of the four faithful 
companions of the saint Angelo, Ruffino, Leo, and Masseo. 4 He does 
not indeed mention them by name, as he doubtless would have done had 
they been Vicars-General or men in authority, but nobody who knew 
them could mistake whom he was describing ; certainly not Elias himself. 
Their virtues are announced in much the same fervent style as are those 
of St. Clare and her sisters. 

It is, however, quite evident that Thomas of Celano, when he wrote 
his Legenda Prima, was of opinion that Elias had been a faithful friend to St. 
Francis and had fulfilled the office of Vicar-General with true merit : nor 
is it unlikely that he went out of his way to praise Elias because of the 
opposition which he knew there was against him on the part of many of 
the friars. But Thomas with his generous disposition to distribute praise 
wherever he considered praise was due, would in such case only deem that 
he was accepting "the leadership and governance of truth " " veritate 
semper praevia et magistra " : and this he would hold was the more im 
perative in regard to a man of such outstanding genius. It does not prove 
that he was in any narrow sense of the word a partisan of Elias as against 
his opponents. It is likely too that in writing the Legenda Prima he 
was brought into immediate relations with Elias in the matter of the 
saint s canonization and glorification. To Elias was committed the work 
of building the saints shrine ; to Thomas, the work of setting forth the 

1 1 Celano, 18-20. 2 Of. I Celano, 20, 74, 99-101, 121-2. 

3 e.g. Several years later St. Clare wrote to Agnes of Prague : " I urge you 
to follow the counsels of our most reverend Father, Brother Elias, Minister- 
General of the whole Order, and put them before all other counsels given you 
to follow, and value them as more precious than any other gift " (Epist. n. 
vide Ada SS., Martii, vol. i. p. 505). 

4 I Celano, 102. 



426 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS.OF ASSISI 

saint s claim to canonization for that was what the Legenda Prima was 
designed to be by Gregory IX. From Elias he would naturally seek 
information regarding the saint s life. Is it surprising that under the 
circumstances Elias figures prominently in the narrative ? 

Another fault found with the Legenda Prima is that it avoids all refer 
ence to the difficulties which arose between St. Francis and some of the 
friars and that it does not set forth the intentions of the saint regarding 
poverty and the life of the Order, such as we find in the Legenda Secunda 
and other documents. But the Legenda Prima was written not for the 
brethren of the Order but for the Catholic world : its purpose was to draw 
the veneration of Catholics in general to wards, the newly canonized founder 
of the Order. The scope of the work was thus narrowed to one of general 
edification, and any reference to the internal politics of the Order would 
have been considered out of place. The Legenda Secunda was written by 
command of the General of the Order, and was designed for the benefit 
of the friars ; but the Legenda Prima was written by order of the Pope 
to announce the claim of St. Francis upon the devotion of the Catholic 
world at large. Brother Thomas did not profess to give a full account of 
the saint s life : twice he warns his readers that his story is incomplete. l 

We have, therefore, no reason to doubt the sincerity and truthfulness 
of the Legenda Prima ; although to complete the authentic history of the 
saint we must have recourse to other documents. It is in fact the founda 
tion upon which our critical knowledge of St. Francis must be built up. 2 

*** 

Celano s Legenda Secunda at once brings us into difficulties. It was 
written by command of the Minister-General Crescentius and was finished 
before 1247, when Crescentius ceased to be General. The command came 
about in this way. At the General Chapter of 1244 it was decreed that 
the brethren who had any personal knowledge of St. Francis should com 
mit their recollections to writing and so forward them to the Minister- 
General. Chief amongst those who obeyed the decree were the three 
companions of the saint, Leo, Angelo, and Ruffino : but others also sent 
in their writings. Having thus collected material, Crescentius committed 
to Thomas of Celano the task of writing a second legend. 3 

The new legend was written in two books. The first book is a record 
of facts concerning the conversion of St. Francis which had not come to 
the knowledge of the author when he wrote the Legenda Prima, together 
with a few incidents of the saint s later life. In the second book the 

1 1 Celano, Prologus, 88. 

2 Of. Goetz, loc. cit. p. 166 ; Joergensen, op. cit. p. xxxiv ; Thode, op. cit. 
p. 277. 

3 Vide II Gelano, Prologus ; cf. Salimbene, loc. cit. p. 176. Bernard a 
Bessa, Catalogus Gen. Minist. no. 5 ; Chron. Jordani a Jano in Anal. Franc. 
i. p. 8 ; Chron. xxiv. Gen. in Anal. Franc, in. p. 261. 



APPENDIX IV 427 

author purposes to set forth the desire and intention of the holy founder 
in regard both to himself and the brethren. 1 

Now several things are to be noted in regard to this legend, which how 
ever we shall consider more fully later on when dealing with the writings of 
the saint s companions. There is in the first place an obvious difference of 
style in the composition of the two books of the legend. The first book 
is written in the style of a biography, just as the Legenda Prima was 
written : whilst the second book is a collection of stories grouped together 
to illustrate different virtues or doctrines of the saint. 

Again, whereas in the Legenda Prima the author refers to himself as 
solely responsible for his work, in the Legenda Secunda he associates 
himself with others," evidently with those whose writings furnished him 
with the materials out of which his legend is composed : but he speaks 
of them as co-authors with himself ; nay, in regard to the second book, 
they take the place of the principal authors, whilst Celano himself is 
hardly more than the scribe or editor. 3 

Yet another trait to be remarked is that the Legenda Secunda, espe 
cially in the second book, bears traces of the difficulties through which 
the Order had passed. Time and again, the author presses home the 
example of the saint and his expressed will, to rebuke those friars who 
had left the straight road of poverty and simplicity. And in reference to 
this it must be recalled that Crescentius, the Minister-General, to whom 
the legend is dedicated, did not favour the party of the strict observance 
as did his successor, John of Parma ; he was rather of the " legal " party 
as was St. Bonaventure the "moderate" party as some might call 
them 4 . The publication of the second book of the Legenda Secunda is to 
be remembered in estimating the views and attitude of the various parties 

1 Cf. II Celano, Prologus, 2. 

2 e.g. I Celano, Prologus, = audivi, potui, ejus merear esse discipulus, 
etc. ; II Celano, Prologus, == concurrimus, percutimur, sumeremus, oramus ergo, 
etc. 

3 Vide Oratio sociorum sancti with which the second book of II Celano 
concludes. 

4 Crescentius was in fact a determined opponent of the extreme zelators. 
Cf. Anal. Franc, in. p. 263. On the other hand, he seems to have favoured 
John of Parma whom he sent as his representative to the Council of Lyons 
in 1245. Cf. Salimbene, loc. cit. p. 176. From this it would seem that Cre 
scentius was not the partisan that Sabatier represents him to be. In his 
Introduction to the Speculum Perfectionis, Sabatier has been led by a mis 
reading of the Chronicle of the XXIV Generals to a severe condemnation of 
Crescentius on the ground that he suppressed the second book of the Legenda 
Secunda or forbade it to be written. At the time of the publication of 
the Speculum Perfectionis, Celano s Tractatus de Miraculis had not been 
discovered. It is now certain that it was this Tractatus which is spoken of as 
the " second part" of the Legenda Secunda by the author of the Chron. xxiv. 
Gen. (Anal. Franc, in. p. 276). Vide infra. 



428 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSISI 

in the Order concerning the primitive observance. And that is all we 
need say at this point about this legend, except to call attention to what 
Celano says in his prologue concerning the miracles of the saint. " Cer 
tain miracles are inserted," he says, " as the opportunity of placing them 
occurred." The miracles are evidently not a first consideration in this 
legend. One remembers how Brother Thomas excuses himself in the 
Legenda Prima for not relating more miracles : " we have determined to 
set forth rather the excellence of his life and the upright manner of his 
conduct, since miracles do not make sanctity but only manifest it "- 1 

The same purpose animates him in the Legenda Secunda. But others 
of the friars were more anxious to preserve these proofs of the sanctity 
of their holy founder : hence John of Parma, on assuming the office of 
General in succession to Crescentius, repeatedly urged Thomas of Celano 
to complete his legends by a work on the saint s miracles. So the 
trusted biographer again took up his pen and wrote the Tractatus de 
Miraculis. The exact date when this treatise was written is unknown, 
but it was completed whilst John of Parma was General, that is before 
his resignation in 1247. 2 Apart from the miracles, the treatise records 
several incidents in the saint s life, not given in the legends ; notably the 
visit of the Lady Giacoma di Settisoli to Francis on his deathbed. 3 

The publication of the Legenda Secunda and of the writings of the 
companions of the saint, undoubtedly furnished the party of the strict 
observance in the Order with a weapon they would not be slow to use. 
Here, they would say, we have evidence of the intentions and mind of 
St. Francis. Under John of Parma this party nourished, but their 
opponents were not silenced : partisan spirit ran high on both sides. 
St. Bonaventure, on succeeding John of Parma, sought to bring about a 
pacification of the opposing elements. Whatever criticism one may pass 
upon the policy with which he endeavoured to compass this purpose, the 
purpose itself can only be judged necessary and godly. In pursuance of 
this policy, then, he undertook, at the instance of the General Chapter, 
held at Narbonne in 1260, to write a new biography of St. Francis which 
the brethren might read without incitement to controversy. To fit him- 

1 1 Celano, 70. 

2 Of. Chron. xxiv. Gen. in Anal. Franc, in. p. 276. Perhaps if we knew 
the date of the Chapter of Genoa held under John of Parma to which 
Eccleston makes reference we should be able to form a more exact con 
clusion. At that chapter, Eccleston tells us, John of Parma ordered Brother 
Bonizzo, one of the saint s companions, to relate before the brethren the truth 
of the stigmata, which many people were calling in question (De Adventu, 
ed. Little, p. 93). It is noteworthy that the Tractatus de Miraculis devotes a 
long chapter to the miracle of the stigmata, written with an evident purpose 
of convincing the unbelievers (cf. ibid. 5, " Nulli sit ambiguitati locus," etc.). 

3 Concerning the authenticity of the Tractatus cf . Van Ortroy, Anal. Boll. 
xvni. pp. 81-93. 



APPENDIX IV 429 

self for this work Bonaventure made new inquiries amongst the brethren 
yet living, who had known the saint : but it shows the completeness with 
which Thomas of Celano had accomplished his task as biographer, that as 
a result of this inquiry, the new biography adds but few details not 
recorded in Celano s work. On the other hand, it omits much that 
Celano has given us. 

As a book of devotion and a stimulus to religious fervour there are 
few biographies to compete with St. Bonaventure s Legend of St. Francis : l 
it is in truth the life of a saint written by a saint. Historically it leaves 
much to be desired. The Legenda Major as this legend is generally 
styled is not primarily a history but a book of edification. Such in 
cidents as it relates are undoubtedly authentic. For the most part St. 
Bonaventure seems to have availed himself of the works of Thomas of 
Celano, notwithstanding his own independent inquiries. 2 The fault of 
the book, from the historian s point of view, is in its omissions. Con 
sequently the figure of St. Francis, impressed upon our mental retina 
after reading the Legenda Major, falls short in many ways of the im 
pression we receive from the work of Celano. Bonaventure s St. Francis 
is emphatically a cloistered monk, notwithstanding his missionary ex 
cursions ; Celano s St. Francis embraces the whole world in his vast 
spiritual freedom and sympathy. Having completed his Legenda Major, 
St. Bonaventure wrote his Legenda Minor for the use of the friars in 
choir. Several liturgical legends already existed, compiled chiefly from 
the Legenda Prima of Celano. 3 

1 A definitive edition of this legend was published by the Quaracchi editors 
in the Opera Omnia of St. Bonaventure, torn. vm. It has also been published 
separately together with the Legenda Minor (vide infra) under the title : 
Seraphici Doctoris S. Bonaventurce, : Legendce dues de vita S. Francisci 
(Quaracchi, 1898). 

2 Cf. Van Ortroy, Anal Boll xvm. pp. 95-7. 

3 e.g. The legend published by Ed. d Alencon in his edition of Celano s 
legends (pp. 435-45). 

Other legends compiled chiefly from the Legenda Prima of Celano are : 

(1) The legend of Julian of Speyer, edited by Van Ortroy in Analecta 
Bollardiana, xxi. pp. 148-202. Cf. Ada SS. Octob. n. p. 548 seq. ; Anal. Boll. 
xix. p. 321 seq. 

(2) The legend Quasi stella, of which, however, we have only a choir 
version, the original being lost. Cf. Ed. d Alencon, in Anal. Ord. P.M. Cap. 
vol. xiv. pp. 370-3. 

(3) Vita Brevis, auctore Bartholomceo Tridentino, in Anal. Ord. P.M. Cap. 
vol. xm. pp. 248-50. 

(4) VitaMetrica, written about 1230 : sometimes, but erroneously, attributed 
to John of Kent. It was edited from the MSS. in the municipal library of 
Assisi by A. Cristofani : II piu antico poema della vita di S. Francesco (Prato, 
1882). 



430 LIFE OF ST. FEANCIS OF ASSIST 

We come now to an important event in the history of Franciscan 
documents. 

In 1266 the General Chapter held at Paris decreed that all the earlier 
legends should be proscribed and as far as possible destroyed, and that 
St. Bonaventure s legend alone should in future be read. Not all the 
copies of the earlier legends, however, were destroyed ; in spite of the 
capitular decree some few copies remained io the hands of those who 
championed the more primitive observance : but for the most part they 
ceased to exist : "it took just 632 years to recover all the scattered frag 
ments of Celano s legends "- 1 

So ends the history of the early legends written by authority : and 
yet it is not the end, as we shall see. 

But before passing on to the next set of documents, we may mention 
here the Legenda Stce. Clarce. z It is now generally attributed to Thomas 
of Celano 3 and was probably written, like Celano s Legenda Prima, as an 
official biography consequent upon the saint s canonization. 4 

*Fr. Paschal Robinson, O.F.M., A Short Introduction to Franciscan 
Literature, pp. 10-11. [I take this opportunity of recommending this excellent 
booklet to those who want a brief but sure indication of Franciscan sources.] 
The decree was published by Rinaldi in his edition of Celano s legends 
(p. 11.) See also Erhle, Archiv, p. 39 ; English Historical Review, xm. pp. 
704-8. Van Ortroy discovered another copy in the Vatican library. Cf. 
Anal. Boll xvm. p. 174. The learned Jesuit critic does not believe in the 
" draconian severity " of the decree and thinks it referred merely to the litur 
gical legends. But in the first place the wording of the decree precludes 
this limitation, since it orders that any copies found outside the Order shall 
if possible be destroyed. Surely the purpose of the decree must have been 
more serious than merely substituting one office by another. Cf. Lemmens, 
Documenta antiqua, 11. p. 11. Moreover, the fact remains that for centuries 
the earlier legends were practically lost sight of. Cf. also the Hist. VII Tri- 
bulationum (Erhle, Archiv, n. p. 265) : "qua scripte erant in legenda prima, 
nova edita a fratre Bonaventura, deleta et destructa sunt ipso jubente ". It 
seems, however, that the Legenda Prima of Celano, and its dependent 
biographies, were not rigorously included in this decree, since Bernard of 
Besse mentions them in his Liber de Laudibus. Perhaps this was owing to 
the fact that the Legenda Prima was written by Papal authority. 

2 It was first published in 1573 by Surius in De probatis SS. vitis, torn, 
iv. Another edition was given by the Bollandists, Acta SS., sub die 12 
Augusti. A definitive edition has lately been published by Prof. Pennacchi, 
based on the Assisi MS. 338. An English translation from the same MS. was 
made by Fr. Paschal Robinson. O.F.M., in 1910, The Life of St. Clare. 
Cf. Mrs. Balfour, The Life and Legend of the Lady St. Clare (London, 
Longmans, 1910). 

3 Cf. Fr. Paschal Robinson, loc. cit. p. xxii.-xxviii. ; Ed. d Alencon, S. 
Francisci Assis. p. xlvi. ; Sabatier, Spec. Perfect, p. Ixxv ; Van Ortroy, in 
Anal. Boll. xxn. p. 360. 

4 Cf. Fr. Paschal Robinson, loc. cit. p. xxix. 



APPENDIX IV 431 

2. The Writings of the Saint s Companions. 

We have already seen how in response to the command of the 
General Chapter of 1244, amongst others the three companions of St. 
Francis, Leo, Angelo, and Ruffino sent their recollections in writing to 
the Minister-General Crescentius. These writings of the three compan 
ions play an important part in the history of Franciscan documents and 
have been and still are the subject of much controversy. 

That the saint s companions did actually send writings to the Minis 
ter-General is undoubted. Apart from the prefatory letter to the tradi 
tional " Legend by the Three Companions," we have the testimony of the 
Legenda Secunda. The dispute is as to the character of the writings and 
their subsequent history. M. Sabatier and others hold that these docu 
ments are nothing else than the traditional "Legend of the Three Com 
panions ". Others again deny this and assert that the documents must be 
sought elsewhere, for instance in Celano s Legenda Secunda or in the 
Speculum Perfectionis. The more probable opinion, it seems to me, is 
that the writings of the three companions so far as they exist at all in 
authentic form are to be found in the Speculum Perfectionis, and in less 
authentic form in the second book of the Legenda Secunda. At the same 
time we cannot say that either of these documents contains all that the 
three companions sent to Crescentius. The traditional " Legend of the 
Three Companions," on the other hand, is not the work of the com 
panions, but was written by an unknown author either before or shortly 
after the publication of Celano s Legenda Secunda. It may be based 
partly on the writings of the companions, but this is not in any way 
certain. 

At the outset it is to be noticed that the traditional * Legend of the 
Three Companions," Legenda 3 Soc. as we shall henceforth write it, cor 
responds very closely with the first book of the Legenda Secunda. It is 
inconceivable that this correspondence is accidental : and for this reason 
amongst others, it seems to me that the Legenda 3 Soc. in the form it has 
come down to us, is the author s complete work, excepting only the pro 
logue or preface, 1 and the additional chapter on the Porziuncola indulgence 

1 Concerning the question of the integrity of the legend, cf. : For the inte 
grity : Faloci-Pulignani, in Miscellanea Franciscana, torn. vn. p. 81 scq. ; S. 
Minocchi, La Legenda trium Soc. : Nouvi studi. Against the integrity. PP. 
Marcellino de Civezza et Teofilo Domenichelli : La Leggenda di San Francesco 
scritta de tre suoi compagni; Sabatier, De Vautlienticite de la legende de S. 
Francois, dite des Trois compagnons ; Description du Speculum Vita in Opuscules 
de Critique Hist. i. fasc. 6 ; Van Ortroy, La legende de S. Francois, in Anal. 
Boll, xix, p. 119 seq. ; Ed. d Alenpon, La Legende de S. Francois dite Legende 
des trois Compagnons ; Tilemann, Speculum Perfectionis und Legenda Trium 
Sociorum. I may call attention here to the unconvincing reconstruction of the 
legend by P. Marcellino da Civezza and P. Teofilo Domenichelli (op. cit.). To 



432 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

which is quite evidently a later addition. At the same time we may note 
the close correspondence between the Speculum Perfectionis and the second 
book of the Legenda Secunda. 

Are we then to conclude that the Legenda 3 Soc. and the Spec. Perfect. 
are compiled mainly from the Legenda Secunda ? Or may it be that all 
three works are compiled from another identical source, namely the 
writings sent by the three companions and others to the Minister-General 
Crescentius? No other alternative is admissible in view of the self- 
revelation of the Legenda Secunda as to its own authorship. We know 
of a certain ity that this legend is based upon these writings. 

Now the first thing to consider in the Legenda 3 Soc. is the prefatory 
letter which purports to be written by the three companions, Leo, Angelo, 
and Ruffino. It tells us that in obedience to the decree of the last i Chapter 
[i.e. of 1244] they have thought it well to acquaint the Minister-General 
of some of the deeds of St. Francis of which they had personal know 
ledge, or which they had learned from other holy friars. The letter is 
dated : Greccio, 15 August, 1246. The curious thing about this letter is 
the following passage : " per>modum legendce non scribimus cum dudum 
de vita sua [S. Francisci] et miraculis quce per eum Dominus operatus est, 
sint confectce legendce. 1 Sed velut de ameno prato quosdam floras arbitrio 
nostro pulchriores excerpimus, continuatam historiam non sequentes, sed 
multa seriose relinquentes, quce in prcedictis legendis sunt posita tarn 
veridico quam luculento sermone." 

But the Legenda 3 Soc., contrariwise, is certainly written in the 
manner of a legend ; and the first sixteen chapters, at any rate, are a 
"continuous history". Consequently it is difficult to believe that the 
prefatory letter and the body of the legend are one original work. In 
nearly all the ancient MSS., however, the Legenda 3 Soc. is followed by 
chapters from the Speculum Perfectionis ; and if, as I believe, this com 
pilation contains many of the original writings of the companions, it is 
easy to account for the presence of the letter at the beginning of the MSS. 

We have spoken of the close correspondence between this legend and 
the first book of the Legenda Secunda : but there are notable differences 
both in style and matter. The writer of the Legenda 3 Soc. was not a 
literary stylist as was Thomas of Celano. He writes freely and with ima 
gination, but his words and phrases are homely, without any marks 
of the scholar. As to the matter, the Legenda 3 Soc. includes incidents 
which find no place in any of Thomas of Celano s writings, e. g. the first 
missionary journey of St. Francis and Brother Giles in the Marches of 

me it seems that the Italian version upon which the reconstruction is built 
up, is merely an attempt to complete the traditional legend by some translator 
desirous of producing a full biography from ancient sources. 

1 i.e. the Legenda Prima and the legend of Julian of Speyer. The wording 
of the letter shows an acquaintance with the Legenda Prima, e.g. the phrase 
veritate pr&via (cf. I Celano, Prologus) : " Miracula qua sanctitatem non 
faciunt sed ostendunt (cf. I Celano, 70). 



APPENDIX IV 43B 

Ancona ; the intervention and death of Cardinal John of St. Paul ; the 
adventure of Brother Bernard at Florence ; the sending of the friars to 
Germany and Hungary. Even in relating the same incidents as Celano, 
the Legenda 3 Soc. frequently adds intimate details ; e.g. both legends 
relate the conversation between St. Francis and Bernard da Quintavalle, 
which preceded the latter s " conversion " ; but it is the Legenda 3 Soc. 
which tells us that Bernard approached Francis secretly and invited him 
to spend a night in his house. So, too, both legends give the parable of 
the fisherman, but the Legenda 3 Soc. alone mentions that it was spoken 
to Brother Giles. Such instances might be multiplied. 

Hence it is evident that even if the author of the Legenda 3 Soc. made 
use of the Legenda Secunda, he nevertheless had before his eyes other 
documents. As to what these documents were, three suppositions are 
possible : they may have been the original documents of the witnesses, 
including the three companions, who sent their written attestations to 
the General Crescentius ; or they may have been other documents written 
from time to time by those who wished to preserve evidences of St. 
Francis life, similar to those collected about 1270 concerning the Por- 
ziuncola indulgence (vide supra, pp. 407 seq.) ; or they may have been 
documents of a later period and of less authentic character. 

This third supposition, however, seems the least tenable. For if the 
Legenda 3 Soc. were, as Van Ortroy and others assert, a later legend of the 
fourteenth century, how is it that it contains no reference to the Por- 
ziuncola indulgence ? * The omission of any such reference indicates to 
my mind that the Legenda 3 Soc. was not written after the indulgence 
had become widely published. 

As I have said, the close correspondence of this legend with the first 
book of the Legenda Secunda proves either that Celano deliberately took 
the Legenda 3 Soc. as his model, or that the author of the Legenda 3 Soc. 
deliberately shaped his legend upon the first book of the Legenda Secunda. 
I confess that I cannot determine to my own satisfaction which of these 
alternatives is the more probable. If we had any definite indication as to 
the actual witnesses, other than the three companions, who sent in their 
writings to the General Crescentius, we might be able to solve, with more 
or less certainty, this troublesome problem. As it is, I can but note the 
following conclusions : 

1. On the supposition that the author of the Legenda 3 Soc. worked 
over the writings of Celano, he did so not as a mere revisionist but with 
the intention of writing a new legend, embracing details which Celano had 
omitted ; and for this purpose he used other documents, including the 
legends prior to the Legenda Secunda. 2 

1 As before mentioned the chapter on the indulgence is evidently a later 
addition. 

2 For instance cap. xvm. seems to show an acquaintance with the legend 
of Julian of Speyer. 

28 



434 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSISI 

2. He may however, whilst following the ground-plan of Celano s work, 
have compiled from the original documents which Celano made use of ; and 
the instances of verbal correspondence between the two legends may be due 
to the fact that both were taken from the same source. This is more 
probable ; for the style of the Legenda 3 Soc. almost precludes the con 
clusion that the author was quoting directly from Celano : so far M. 
Sabatier s Critique of the Legenda 3 Soc. seems to me conclusive. 1 

3. Whoever the writer was, he was not of the militant party of the 
strict observance, though his sympathies were eminently drawn to the 
primitive ideal. There is in the style a clear detachment from the rest 
lessness and agitation of the militant partisan. He can speak with a cer 
tain pride of the grand basilica built in honour of St. Francis even as he 
takes a pride in the poverty of the saint and the first brethren. 

4. The legend was not written much later than 1270, since it does not 
mention the Porziuncola indulgence. 

5. The writings of the companions may have contributed matter to 
the Legenda 3 Soc. ; but in any case they are not the sole source of the 
legend. 2 

* 
* * 

The case is different when we come to the Speculum Perfectionis. 
Here we undoubtedly have some, if not all, of the documents written by 
the three companions. 

If we compare the Speculum Perfectionis with the second book of the 
Legenda Secunda, it is at once evident that the two works are in the main 
closely related in both matter and form : and a study of the two docu 
ments makes it clear that in the Spec. Perfect, we have original writings 
which Celano edited and somewhat refashioned. 3 

It has yet to be determined how far the original Spec. Perfect, is the 
work of the three companions, and whether the compilation which first 
bore that name was exclusively their work. What is certain is that the 
edition published by M. Sabatier in 1898 is a compilation containing other 
writings besides the work of the companions. It is one of the numerous 
compilations which came into existence about the beginning of the four 
teenth century. 4 The earliest MSS. which contains the Spec. Perfect, as 

1 De V authenticite de la Legende de Saint Frangois dite des Trois Com- 
pagnons (Paris, 1901). 

2 Besides the authors already cited, cf . A. Fierens, La Question Franciscaine 
in Revue d Histoire Ecclesiastique, 15 Avril, 1906. 

3 Cf. Lemmens, Doc. Antiq. n. pp. 17-18 ; Sabatier, Spec. Perfect, cxix. seq. 

4 M. Sabatier entitled his work : Speculum Perfectionis seu S. Francisci 
Assisiensis Legendi Antiquissima, auctore fratre Leone ; and he announced 
that it was written in 1227. He was led to this conclusion by the date 
affixed to the Mazarine MS. upon which his edition is based. That MS. gives 
the date 1228. It is now certain that this is a scribe s mistake for 1318. Con 
cerning the question of the Spec. Perfect, cf. Van Ortroy, Anal. Boll. xix. 



APPENDIX IV 435 

edited by M. Sabatier, have the date 1318. Fr. Lemmens, O.F.M., has 
however published what he considers an earlier and more authentic 
version which differs from that of M. Sabatier in both matter and arrange 
ment. It is a much shorter document ; and unlike the other versions, 
the incidents it records are not grouped together in the manner of II 
Celano, 11. The probability is that it is a late compilation ; and that 
the Sabatier compilation is the more authentic. 1 The difficulty, however, 
remains how to distinguish between what belongs to the companions and 
what to other writers in M. Sabatier s edition. One may say at once that 
the passages corresponding with Gelano s book are substantially authentic. 
Such passages occur in eighty-six chapters of the Spec. Perfect. But even 
in these we cannot say that we have always the original text of the com 
panions, though for the most part the evidence favours the Spec. Perfect. 
as against Celano. 2 But besides the passages corresponding with the 
Legenda Secunda there are ten chapters, the authenticity of which is 
guaranteed by Ubertino da Casale and other writers of the time of Uber- 
tino. We know that Ubertino had in his hands the rotuli of Brother Leo 
and that he was acquainted with a book written by Brother Leo, which 
at the time was in the treasury of the Sagro Convento. His quotations 
from the writings of Brother Leo may therefore be accepted as authentic. 3 
But whether the rotuli formed part of the documents sent to Cresceiitius, 
or whether they were an independent document, we have no means of 
judging. But for practical purposes the question is of little moment. 
As regards the remaining portions of Sabatier s edition they have the 
same value, neither more nor less, which belongs to many other docu 
ments which appear in the compilations made at the beginning of the four 
teenth century, for the authenticity of which we have no positive proof. 
Further research may yet prove them to be authentic, or may give us the 
original documents upon which these portions are based. But of this 
more will be said as we proceed. 

*** 
3. The Later Compilations. 

Towards the end of the thirteenth century there set in a period of 
restless activity on the part of the friars to gather together all that had 
been written about St. Francis. St. Bonaventure s legend, far from 
satisfying the body of the friars, only produced dissatisfaction. The 

p. 58 seq. ; Faloci-Pulignani, in Misc. Franc, torn. vii. ; Ed. d Alencon, An- 
nales Franciscaines, torn, xxxvu. ; Little, in English Historical Review, vol. 
xvn. p. 655 ; A. Fierens, loc. cit. Cf. fitudes Franciscaines, xxvu. p. 337 seq. 
See also the works cited above concerning the Leg. 3 Soc. 

1 In Doc. Antiq. n. Cf. Van Ortroy, Anal. .BoZZ.-xxi. p. 114 ; Faloci-Pulig 
nani, Misc. Franc, vm. p. 131 ; Lemmens, Voix de Saint Antoine, Avril, 1903. 

2 Cf. Sabatier, Spec. Perfect, passim ; Goetz, Die Quellen, pp. 216-21. 

a Cf . Lemmens, Doc. Antiq. i. p. 75 seq. ; Sabatier, Spec. Perfect. CXL. sea. 

28* 



436 LIFE OF ST. FEANCIS OF ASSISI 

party of the strict observance did not conceal their opinion that this 
legend did not give an adequate account of St. Francis intentions con 
cerning the vocation of the Order : even the "moderate " party desired 
a more complete biography. At the General Chapter of Padua, held in 
1277, under St. Bonaventure s successor, it was ordained that the brethren 
in all the provinces should seek information as to the deeds of St. Fran 
cis and other holy brothers. l Shortly after this there appeared the Liber 
de Laudibus,* written by Bernard of Besse, who had been one of St. Bona 
venture s secretaries. It is but a small work ; yet of great value, inasmuch 
as it relates several incidents concerning St. Francis and the Order, not 
found in the earlier legends. The author evidently was acquainted not 
only with the earlier Celanese legends but also with Celano s later works 
and the writings of the companions : though his acquaintance with these 
documents may have been at second hand. 3 

Probably somewhat earlier the legend known as the Anonymus 
Perusinus 4 was written, which also contains a few details not found in the 
official legends. In fact it would seem that the period of active compila 
tions began about 1270. An instance of this activity in gathering to 
gether the records of St. Francis life is to be seen in regard to the 
Porziuncola indulgence. 5 Probably not unconnected with this activity 
was the formal act of donation concerning Monte Alvernia made by 
Count Roland of Chiusi in 1274. 6 

At first these compilations, it would seem, were made independ 
ently by individuals or communities, anxious to make good the omissions 
in the legend by St. Bonaventure, or to collect the traditions which 
had been preserved in particular provinces. Later there was an active 
research for lost documents, notably those of the saint s companions. 
About the beginning of the fourteenth century these original collections 
are found incorporated in larger collections; and these larger collec 
tions were again later on gathered together into one series of docu- 

1 Glassberger, Anal. Franc, n. p. 89. 

2 Two editions of this work were published in 1897 : one by Fr. Hilarin of 
Lucerne, the other by the Quaracchi editors in Anal. Franc, torn. in. Both 
publications include the Catalogus Generalium Ministrorum attributed to 
the same author. Of. Archiv. Franc. Hist, an n. fasc. in. p. 430 seq. 

3 It is curious that Bernard of Besse does not mention the Legenda 
Secunda amongst the existing legends, though he makes express mention 
of Celano s Legenda Prima. He could hardly have been ignorant of its 
existence. The explanation would seem to be that the Legenda Secunda 
was still officially banned, and not improbably he quoted from extracts which 
were made by various brethren at the time when the codices of this and 
other banned legends were being destroyed. 

4 Published in part in Acta SS. Octob. u. Comment. Pr&v. The complete 
text is given by Van Ortroy in Misc. Franc, ix. pp. 33-48. 

5 Vide supra, p. 407. 6 Of. Sbaralea, Bull. iv. p. 156, note h. 



APPENDIX IV 437 

mentis. Thus the Actus S. Francisi in which the greater part of the original 
Floretum was incorporated, and the Speculum Perfectionis, comprising 
amongst other documents, a collection of the writings of the companions, 
are found incorporated in a larger collection, compiled by a friar from 
the Baltic province, and known as the " Fac secundum exemplar" collec 
tion. It is found in a large number of codices scattered throughout 
Europe, of which the Vatican MS. 4354 is one of the earliest examples. 1 
The collection was probably made between 1318 and 1328. 2 

The compiler of this collection tells us in a preface that he gathered 
his materials from four sources : 

(a) A book of Frederic, Archbishop of Riga. 3 

(6) The Legenda Vetus, which he had heard read in the refectory of 
the friars at Avignon, and which was read there by command of 
the Minister- General. 4 

(c) The writings of the companions of St. Francis. 

(d) Finally, he has written " certain wonderful things" concerning 

St. Anthony, John of Alvernia, and other holy brothers. 
When we turn to the collection itself we find that it embraces : 
(a) Eighty-one chapters of the Spec. Perfect. , though not in the same 

order as in Sabatier s edition and in some cases with notable 

variants. 
(6) Nearly the whole of the Actus S. Francisci. 

(c) Six chapters concerning the observance of the Rule which would 

seem to have been taken together out of some other document. 

(d) Some writings of St. Francis. 

(e) Sayings of Brother Giles and other friars. 

(/) Attestations concerning the Porziuncola indulgence. 

These documents are found in all the codices : but in some cases 
additions have been made by copyists or collectors. 

One would like to know how far the collections, which now go by the 
title, Fac secundum, exemplar, represent the actual collection made by 
the Baltic friar. Is the entire collection save for a few manifest addi 
tions his, or has it been greatly added to ? 

M. Sabatier, after a study of the Leignitz MS., 5 concludes that the 
collection, as therein represented, is in two parts : the first part being 
the original collection of the Baltic friar. Now this first part embraces 

1 Of. Sabatier, Spec. Perfect. CLXXVI.-CC. ; Description du Manusrit Fran- 
ciscain de Leignitz in Opuscules, torn. i. fasc. n. ; also cf. ibid. fasc. in. 

2 Cf. Joergensen, op. cit. p. Ixxxviii : Sabatier says between 1322 and 1328. 
Cf. Actus S. Franc. Preface, p. xviii. 

y Frederick was Archbishop of Riga from 1304 until 1341. 

4 Either Gonsalvez or Michael of Cesena, both of whom were favourable 
to the strict observance. Gonsalvez was Minister-General 1304-1313 ; Michael 
of Cesena, 1316-1328. 

5 Cf. Opuscules, i. fasc. in. 



438 LIFE OF ST. FBANCIS OF ASSIST 

sixty-one chapters taken from the Spec. Perfect. ; seven chapters of un 
known origin, but all bearing upon the strict observance of the Rule ; 
and thirty-one chapters corresponding to the Actus, of which the first 
sixteen chapters concern St. Francis, whilst the last fifteen tell the 
wonderful deeds of St. Anthony, John of Alvernia, and other friars of 
"blessed memory". There are eight intercalated chapters which seem 
to stand apart from these groups. From this M. Sabatier concludes 
that : 

(a) " The book of Archbishop Frederic " was in fact the Spec. Perfect. 
(6) The seven chapters bearing on the observance of the Rule are 
from the Legenda Vetus. 

(c) The first sixteen chapters corresponding to the Actus are from 

writings of the companions of the saint. 

(d) The last fifteen chapters of the Actus are those writings relating 

to St. Anthony, of which the Baltic friar speaks. 

If the order of chapters given in the Leignitz MS. could be shown to 
be the original order, there would certainly be much to be said in favour 
of M. Sabatier s conclusions. Further on, however, we shall note one 
serious objection to this division. Meanwhile, those seven chapters 
which, according to M. Sabatier, are extracted from the Legenda Vetus 
are of primary interest to the students of Franciscan history. Whether 
they are portions of the Legenda Vetus or not, is a matter of secondary 
importance. What really matters is their substantial authenticity. 

There can be no doubt that they represent a tradition of the party of 
the strict observance, and moreover a tradition with its source in the 
earlier days of the Order before 1246 ; but it may be doubted whether 
the tradition is given in these documents in its primitive form. A com 
parison of the chapter, " De apparitione stupenda angeli," * with the recital 
and explanation of the same story by Celano " indicates an evolution as to 
form. In Celano s day the various explanations of the vision are given as 
distinct from the story of the vision : in the present document the ex 
planation is worked into the vision itself. Again the chapter, " De statu 
malo fi(,turo fratrum," 3 is manifestly a recital in which the original words 
of St. Francis have been repeated in the light of later events. On the 
other hand, the chapter, " De euntibus inter fideles," 4 is but a summary 
of chapter xvi. of the Rule of 1221. Of special interest are the chapters 

1 Opuscules, p. 99. 

2 II Celano n. 82, cf. ad finem : Plures oraculum istud religioni coaptant, 
etc. 

3 Opuscules, p. 87. 

4 Opuscul&s, p. 102. The phrase " Hanc petere judicabat " [S. Franciscus] 
proves that the writer is summarizing this chapter of the Rule ; arid there is 
no reason to think we have here an earlier version than is contained in the 
Rule of 1221. 



APPENDIX IV 439 

" De intentione Sancti Francisci" l and " Exemplum de prcedicta volun- 
tate ".* In the former chapter we have an interesting account of how the 
Pope modified the Rule of 1223 before confirming it. 3 A similar account 
is given in the Historia VII Tribulat, 4 and it is most probably based upon 
the writings of Brother Leo : though doubtless the conversation between 
St. Francis and the Pope is to be taken with due regard to the custom of 
ancient and mediaeval historians of making their characters speak always 
in the first person. Nor is the story of the German friar in the latter 
chapter at all improbable, having regard to what we know of St. Francis 
mind. We may therefore take these chapters as witnessing to an early 
tradition. 

But whether as they stand in the collection " Fac secundum exemplar," 
these chapters were taken from the Legenda Vetus, or whether, as seems 
more likely, from " the truthful sayings of the holy companions of St. 
Francis, put into writing by approved men of the Order " as the Baltic 
friar writes we have no certain test to judge by. 

True it is, the friar tells us in his preface that the Legenda Vetus he 
refers to was quoted verbally and frequently by St. Bonaventure in the 
Legenda Major, and from this description we might be led to infer that 
it could be no other than the Celanese legends or the Legenda 3 Soc. 
But then amongst the documents in the collection there are none that can 
be identified with these legends. 

A not improbable hypothesis is that this Legenda Vetus was a collection 
of manuscripts embracing the Legenda 3 Soc. and the Spec. Perfect. of 
which there are known examples 5 and that it is a portion of the Spec. 
Perfect, which the Baltic friar extracted. In fact it would seem that the 
collections based upon documents or traditions earlier than the Legenda 
Major were generically described as Legenda Vetus or Legenda Antiqua. 
The collection " Fac secundum exemplar " is itself styled Legenda Antiqua ; 
yet the Legenda Antiqua quoted in later writings is not always found to 
indicate this collection. 

* 
* * 

Some consideration must now be given to the Fioretti, that delightful 
Italian book which has done so much to make the Franciscan legend 
known and loved. The Fioretti shares with the Sacrum Commercium 6 

1 Opuscules, p. 90. 2 ibid. p. 96. 

:i Vide supra, p. 323. 4 Erhle, Archiv, in. p. 601. 

5 Whence it is concluded by some critics that the Legenda 3 Soc. and the 
original Spec. Perfect, formed one legend, namely the complete legend by the 
companions. Of. Tilemann, op. cit. p. 123 ; Joergensen, op. cit. p. Ixxxvi. 

r> Sacrum Commercium B. Francisci cum Domina Paupertate, edited by 
P. Ed. d Alencon (Rome, 1900), who claims that it was written in 1227 by 
Giovanni Parenti, the first Minister- General after St. Francis. An exquisite 
English translation has been made by M. Montgomery Carmichael under the 
title, The Lady Poverty (London : Murray, 1902). 



440 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

the claim to be the purest literary embodiment of the Franciscan spirit. 
But whereas this latter work is an allegory, the Fioretti claims to be 
history. The claim has indeed been much disputed, and for a long time 
the book was held by the critics to be without historical value. To-day, 
in the light of recent research, the historian regards the Fioretti more 
favourably. 

There can be no doubt now that the Italian work is a translation 
from a Latin original. The translator is unknown : l whoever he was, he 
had a marvellous gift of literary expression, which has made his work one 
of the literary treasures of the world. In the printed editions and in 
most of the MSS. the Fioretti has attached to it four other documents : 
the Considerations upon the Sacred Stigmata, the life of Brother 
Jupiter, the life of Brother Giles, and the sayings of Brother Giles : but 
these do not belong to the original book. 2 

The Fioretti proper falls into two main sections : the first section 
comprises the first thirty-eight chapters, which tell of St. Francis and his 
companions ; the second section takes in the last thirteen chapters, 
relating the wonderful deeds of certain friars of the Marches of Ancona. 
These are two chapters intercalated between the two sections, of which 
St. Anthony of Padua is the hero. 

It becomes evident as one studies the Fioretti that we have here a 
compilation from different sources. The first section probably represents 
a compilation of much earlier date than the second : also, it probably ori 
ginated in the Marches, and is in fact a collection of stories which 
different friars of that province had heard from the saint s own com 
panions. For in cap. 16 we are explicitly told that Brother James of 
Massa had the story of the preaching to the birds from Brother Masseo 
himself ; and in cap. 32, Brother James of Fallerone is said to have spoken 
with the same Brother Masseo about the incident related in that chapter. 

Further, it is noteworthy that nearly all the friars whose glories form 
the subject of the second section were intimate with St. Francis and his 
companions, or at least with their associates. Brother Simon was received 
into the Order during the lifetime of the saint ; :5 Brother James of Faller 
one (as we have said) had spoken with Brother Masseo ; 4 Brother James of 
Massa, with Brothers Masseo, Giles, and Juniper ; 5 Brother John of la 
Penna received the habit from Brother Philip, probably Philip the Long, 
one of the first companions and a preacher of great eloquence ; 6 Brother 
Peter of Monticello and Brother Bentivoglio both were received by St. 
Francis himself ; " whilst Brother Conrad of Offida 8 and Brother John of 

1 It has been attributed to Giovanni di San Lorenzo but without suf 
ficient historical evidence. 

2 Of. The Little Flowers of St. Francis, Introduction. (London, Cath. 
Truth Soc., ed. 1912.) 

3 Vide cap. 41. 4 loc. cit. 5 Capp. 16 and 48. 
6 Cap. 45. 7 Cap. 42. 8 Capp. 42-4. 



APPENDIX IV 441 

Fermo, in their retreats on Monte Alvernia, 1 must have made the ac 
quaintance of those who knew the saint s companions. May not we 
assume that these friars were held in special reverence in the Marches 
because of their intimacy with those who knew the story of the first 
Franciscan days ? In the Marches the friars of the strict observance 
were numerous and venturesome. They would be likely to treasure tra 
ditions of the primitive life ; and those who delivered the traditions 
would be held in high reverence. Consequently we may believe that the 
Fioretti represents, as far as it goes, the story of St. Francis as told in 
the Marches of Ancona, by those who knew St. Francis and his compan 
ions ; and we shall not be far wrong in assuming that the stories circu 
lating amongst the friars of the Marches were collected and written down 
not long after 1270, at the time- when the friars were so anxious to 
collect and preserve the traditions concerning their holy founder. If we 
admit all this, then the Fioretti must be regarded as a source of Francis 
can history of no mean value. At the same time we have a canon of 
criticism by which to judge the historical value of the stories as they 
stand : they have, in short, the value of oral traditions of the first or 
second generation. 

But in judging the historical value of the Fioretti we shall have a 
surer test when we discover the Latin original of the Italian translation. 
So far we can only test it by the corresponding chapters in the Actus B. 
Francisci, a Latin compilation of a somewhat earlier date than the Fioretti. 
In this compilation all but six chapters of the Fioretti are found in an 
almost equivalent Latin version ; but with a difference which proves the 
Actus to be the earlier and more authentic version. For in the Actus the 
personal note is more in evidence : the stories are more frequently related 
with an addition such as : " as I myself have seen ". a But this character 
istic of the Actus, it should be noted, is found almost exclusively in the 
chapters corresponding with the second section of the Fioretti. 

We have already noticed that six chapters of the Fioretti have no 
corresponding passages in the Actus. From this it would seem that the 
translator of the Fioretti had before him a Latin work other than the 
Actus, from which this compilation itself was also partly quarried. Which 
conclusion is the more probable since the Actus, which is by far the more 
lengthy work, is evidently drawn from other sources besides those from 
which the Fioretti springs. In some parts one misses the true ring 
of the story-tellers of the Marches. 3 On the other hand there are some 
" Non-Fioretti " chapters in the Actus which might well find a place in 
the Fioretti. It is, however, not unlikely that the original Fioretti was 

1 Capp. 49-53. 

<J Of. T. W. Arnold : Tlie Auttwrsliip of the Fioretti, Occasional Paper 
(International Society of Franciscan Studies British Branch), No. III. 
3 e.g. Actus, capp. 58, 61, 62, 65. 



442 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSIST 

added to by different collectors amongst the friars of the Marches. A 
definitive edition of the Actus may solve these difficulties. 1 

It has been justly remarked that the Fioretti can be claimed by no 
individual author. It is a compilation of several lesser compilations. 
All we can say as to individual authorship is that a certain Brother 
Ugolino Brunforte had something to do with it. He was probably one of 
several collectors of the traditions in the Marches. 2 The Fioretti dates 
from not later than 1328, since it is for the greater part found in the col 
lection " Fac secundum exemplar ". It could not have been completed 
before 1322, in which year Brother John of Fermo (or John of Alvernia 

as he is usually called) died. 

* 
* -it- 

There yet remain other sources for which the same collection " Fac se 
cundum exemplar " may be said to stand sponsor, such as the Vitce of 
Brothers Giles and Juniper, all of which have doubtless a similar history 
to the compilations already referred to. One of these at least can be 
traced authentically to Brother Leo, the companion of St. Francis, and 
that is the Vita Fr. ^Egidii. 

We have the testimony of Salimbene that Brother Leo wrote the life 
of Brother Giles ; and though it is doubtful whether any extant " Life " 
is Brother Leo s original work, there can be no doubt that the " Lives " 
in the Chron. xxiv. Gen., 3 and the Fioretti and others similar to these, 
are more or less versions of that work. The Incipit, with which these 
" Lives " for the most part begin, contains an affirmation that the writer 
was well acquainted with Brother Giles and his companions. 4 In the 
Fribourg and Leignitz codices of the " Fac secundurn exemplar " collection 
Brother Leo is expressly mentioned as the author. But according to 
mediaeval usage, this need not mean more than that the work is substanti 
ally drawn from that of the author named. 5 



1 M. Sabatier s edition published in Collection deludes, torn. iv. is 
confessedly but a tentative edition. (Vide ibid. Preface.) It is to be noticed 
that in the collection "Fac secundum exemplar," the Actus is a much shorter 
compilation and excludes ten chapters of the Fioretti, which however appear 
in other portions of the collection. 

2 Of. Fioretti, cap. 45 ; Actus, cap. 9. Ugolino entered the Order about 
1278. In 1295 he was appointed Bishop of Teramo by Celestine V, but the 
appointment was quashed by Boniface VIII. Ugolino died in 1348. 

3 Anal. Franc, in. pp. 74-114. 

4 "Prout a suis sociis intellexi et ab eodem viro sancto, cui familiar is fui t 
experientia didici." 

5 In 1901 Fr. Lemmens published what he then considered to be the 
original Vita Fr. Aegidii by Brother Leo (Doc. Antiq. i) : but this work is 
evidently a much later version. Cf. Van Ortroy in Anal. Bull xxi. p. 122 ; 
Sabatier, Actus, p. Ixviii. Concerning the Vita B. Fr. Aegidii, cf. Menge, Der 



APPENDIX IV 443 

Here we may call attention to the writings of certain of the Spirituals, 
to which we have indeed already referred. There can be no doubt that 
we owe it to the zeal, temperate or intemperate as you may judge it, of the 
party of the strict observance that the writings of the companions have 
come down to us at all. These writings were to them a sort of fifth gospel 
which they held in exceeding reverence and quoted as a final argument. 
It is thus that some of the writings of Brother Leo have come down to us, 
which he wrote concerning the intention of St. Francis in the matter of the 
Rule. They are found textually quoted in the writings of Peter John Olivi l 
[died 1398], Ubertino da Casale 2 [died circa 1338], and Angelo Clareno 3 
[died 1336]. Two Opuscules, closely corresponding with the descriptions 
given by Ubertino da Casale and Angelo Clareno of two books written by 
Brother Leo, were published in 1901 by Father Lemmens from a MS. in 
the Convent of St. Isidore. They are the Intentio Regulx and the Verba 

S. P. Francisci. 4 

x- 
x- * 

Of the compilations made at the end of the fourteenth century, little 
need be said here. 

The Chronicle of the Twenty-four Generals was completed about 1374. 
The authorship has been generally ascribed to Arnold of Sarano, who, as 
Bartholomew of Pisa tells us, was "for a long time Minister of Aqui- 
taine," and " transcribed all that he could find concerning the Blessed 
Francis". 5 Internal evidence proves that it was written by a friar of 
Aquitaine, for the author shows an intimate knowledge of the provincials 
of tha.t province. 6 Whoever he was, the author was a painstaking com 
piler, and he had a knowledge of documents which are now lost. 7 
Critically he is often at fault. 8 

More interesting, as regards the history of St. Francis, is the work 
of Bartholomew of Pisa, De Conformitate Vitce Beati Francisci ad Vitam 
Domini Jesu, which was approved by the General Chapter of Assisi in 
1399. The author, with the instinct of the historian, constantly gives the 

Selige Aegidius von Assisi ; Fr. Paschal Robinson, The Golden Sayings of 
Brother Giles, Introduction. 

1 Expositio Regula, cap. x. 

2 Arbor Vitce, Responsio and Declaratio. 

3 Expositio Regulcc and Hist. VII Tribulat. 

4 Cf. Doc. Antiq. i. p. 75 seq. It is, however, doubtful whether the Verba 
as published by Lemmens is the primitive text. Cf. ibid. pp. 81-2. 

5 De Conformit. in Anal. Franc, iv. p. 573. Wadding (Annales, ad an. 
1376) says : "a quibusdam judicatur auctor Chronicorum XXIV Generalium . 

6 In all probability, however, the compilation is not the work of one author, 
but of several. 

7 e.g. He had seen the letter which accompanied the Tractates de Mira- 
culis (Anal. Franc, in. p. 276). 

8 The chronicle has been edited in Anal. Franc, in. 



444 LIFE OF ST. FEANCIS OF ASSISI 

sources of his recitals. He thus refers by name to Thomas of Celano, 
St. Bonaventure, the Legend of the Three Companions, the Speculum Per- 
fectionis. But his frequent reference to the Legenda Antiqua is rather 
puzzling. For the most part the passages thus referred to, are found in the 
" Fac secundum exemplar" collection, but sometimes such passages are 
found not in that collection, but elsewhere, e.g. the Legenda Prima 
of Celano. Possibly he had before him a larger collection than any we 
now possess, in which these other passages were embodied. 1 

4. The Chronicles dealing professedly with the History of the Order 
rather than with the Life of St. Francis. 

Two early chronicles giving an account of the beginnings of the 
German and English Provinces of Friars Minor are of great value as 
regards the story of St. Francis. Brother Giordano de Giano, who wrote 
an account of the first years of the Friars Minor in Germany, was present 
at the General Chapter of 1221 and had some personal knowledge of the 
saint whose sanctity, however, the chronicler naively confesses he did 
not fully appreciate until the saint s canonisation. 2 Giordano dictated 
his chronicle in 1262 when he was advanced in years, 3 but he seems to 
have been endowed with an accurate memory, since in only a few details 
is his evidence called in question by critical research. For candour and 
simple human feeling there are few chronicles to put beside that of the 
Italian friar who went to Germany in fear of his life, but learned to love 
the country as though it were his own. His account of how he came to 
be included amongst the friars sent on the German mission in 1221 shows 
that he was of a curious and observant cast of mind in regard to matters 
which interested him. Though concerned chiefly with the progress of 
the Order in Germany, the chronicle gives many illuminative stories 
relating to the life of St. Francis, notably to the saint s journey to the 
East, and his subsequent recall to quell the disturbances which had 
meanwhile arisen in the Order. 

*** 

The Chronicle of Thomas of Eccleston : De, Adventu FF. Minorum in 
Angliam, though not so rich in matters concerning St. Francis as the 
preceding, is nevertheless our authority for the coming of the friars to 
England in 1224. Incidentally, too, it adds to our knowledge of the 
saint s character. It was finished about 1260. 4 



1 A critical edition of the De Conformitate has been published by the 
Quaracchi Fathers in Anal. Franc, iv. and v. 

2 Chron. Jordani, no. 59, in Anal. Franc, i. p. 18. 

3 The chronicle has been published in Anal. Franc, i. ; and by Boehmer, 
in Collection d Etudes, Tome iv. A continuation of the chronicle is given in 
Archiv. Franc. Hist., January, 1910. 

4 Eccleston s chronicle has been edited by Brewer in Monumenta Fran- 
ciscana, i. and in part by Howlett in Monumenta Franc, n. ; and again by the 



APPENDIX IV 445 

Salimbene s Chronicle contributes incidentally to our knowledge of 
early Franciscan days and sources. It was written between 1282 and 
1287. * Though written by a Friar Minor, it can hardly be called a 
chronicle of the Order in the strict use of the words. He tells us much 
about the Order and many things besides in an intimate sort of way : it 
might be described as a book of gossip, but of gossip shot through with 
keen observation and shrewd judgments. 

*** 

Passing by the Chronicle of the xxiv. Generals, of which we have 
already spoken, we come next to the sixteenth century chronicles, notable 
amongst which are the Chronicles of Mariano of Florence 2 and the Chron 
icle of Mark of Lisbon. 3 Both chroniclers seem to have had access to 
documents which are now lost. Mariano of Florence has given us valu 
able information concerning the early days of the Third Order. 

Glassberger s Chronicle, written about 1508, is chiefly concerned with 
the German Province ; it is incidentally of interest as concerning St. 
Francis. 4 

Finally there is Luke Wadding s stupendous work, Annales Minorum, 
published between 1625 and 1654. As might be expected in such a mighty 
labour undertaken by one man, the critical faculty was less in evidence 
than the acquisitive. Wadding s chronology is frequently at fault ; and 
the sources from which he compiled were often of inferior value even when 
more authentic records were at hand. 

III. 
WRITERS OTHER THAN THOSE OF THE FRANCISCAN ORDER. 

Under this heading the first place must be given to the writings of 
Jacques de Vitry. Two letters of his are known, one written from Genoa 
in 1216, and another from Damietta in 1219, both detailing his observa 
tions of St. Francis and the new Franciscan Order. He also mentions 
them in his Historia Occidentalis. As of an eye-witness, looking on from 
outside the Order, his shrewd observation is of special weight. 

Quaracchi editors in Anal. Franc, i. A definitive edition has been published 
by Prof. A. G. Little (Paris, 1909). Of. The Chronicle of Thomas of Eccles- 
ton (London, 1909) by the present writer. 

1 Of . Chronica fratris Salimbene Parmensis (Parma, 1857). A critical 
edition was published in 1905, in Mon. Germ. Hist. Script, xxxn. pars i. 

2 Mariano s chronicles are not yet published, but a compendium of the 
chronicles is given in Archiv. Franc. Hist. an. i. fasc. u. seq. 

3 Published at Lisbon in 1556-68. 

4 This chronicle is published in Anal. Franc, n. Other works of incidental 
value to the student of the first Franciscan days are Umbria Serafica by 
Antonio a Stronconio (Misc. Franc, n.) ; Historiarum Seraphicce Religionis, by 
Rudulphius Tossiauinensis ; De origine Seraphicfe Religionis, by Ven. Francis 
Gonzaga. 



446 LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSISI 

Again, there is the declaration of Thomas of Spalatro, who was 
present when St. Francis was preaching in Bologna in 1222, in which he 
describes the appearance of the saint and his manner of preaching. l 

Besides these, we have numerous valuable evidences in various chron 
icles of the time. But for all these I refer my readers to the scholarly 
collections of such evidences, published by P. Golubovich in his encyclo 
paedic Bibliotheca Bio-Biblioyrafica della Terra Santa (Quaracchi, 1906), 
and by P. Lemmens in Archiv. Franc. Hist. an. i. fasc. I. seq. under the 
title Testimonia Minor a saec XIII de S. P. Francisco. 

IV. 
DIPLOMATIC AND LEGAL DOCUMENTS. 

These include Papal letters, 2 the registers of Honorius III 3 and 
Gregory IX, 4 and various legal documents, notably the Instrumentuni 
Donationis Montis Alvernae. 5 The recently discovered peace-treaty 
made between Perugia and Assisi in 1203 is of value as affording 
authentic evidence regarding the war in which St. Francis took part. 

1 Of. supra, p. 302. 

2 Of. Sbaralea, Bullarium Franciscanum and tha calendar of Papal letters 
by Potthast. 

3 Pressutti, Regesta Honorii III. 

4 Registres, ed. Auvray ; Guido Levi, Registri dei Cardinal Ugolino d Ostia 
e Ottaviano degli TJbaldini. 

5 Sbaralea, loc. cit. iv. p. 156. Of incidental value are the contract 
published by P. Ed. d Alencon in Frdre Jacqueline, pp. 37-8 ; and the legal 
document published by A. Gristofani in Delle Storie di Assisi, ed. 1902, pp. 
50-1. 



INDEX. 



ACCURSO, Br. : martyred, 339. 

Acre : St. Francis at, 377-8. 

" Actus S. Francisci " : compilation en 
titled, 437, 441. 

Adjuto, Br. : martyred, 239. 

Agnellus, Br., of Pisa : joins the Fra 
ternity, 151 ; is sent to England, 
335. 

Agnes, sister of St. Clare : joins her 
sister Clare at Sant Angelo, 139 ; 
is rescued from her friends by 
Clare, 140 ; is sent to Monticelli 
as Abbess, 140. 

Agnes of Prague, Blessed: works for 
poor, 142. 

Albert, Br., of Pisa : joins the Frater 
nity, 151. 

Albigenses : crusade against, 182. 

Alvernia, Monte : is given for use by 
the brethren, 160 ; Francis retires 
to, 336 ; Francis leaves, 348. 

Amazialbene, Br. : Br. Juniper s 
sorrow at death of, 121. 

Ambrogio, Cistercian monk : visitor of 
the Poor Ladies, 252. 

Ancona : Francis missionary journey 
through marches of, 61 ; Francis 
sails from, 156 ; Province of the 
Marches of, 205. 

Andrea della Robbia : 185. 

Angelo Bernardone: brother of St. 
Francis, 31. 

Angelo Clareno : writings of, 439, 
443. 

Angelo Tancredi, Br. : joins the Frater 
nity, 59, 75 ; goes on journey with 
Francis, 161 ; accompanies Francis 
to M. Alvernia, 337 ; and to Rieti, 
352 ; his writings, 431. 

Anonymus Perusinus : legend by, 436. 

Anthony, St., of Padua : joins the Fra 
ternity, 240 ; his appearance in 
history, 303 ; is sent to San Paolo, 
303 ; is called upon to preach, 304 ; 
preaches to the fishes, 305 ; is ap 
pointed Lector of Theology, 306 ; 
his friendship with Gallo, 306; 



influence of the Victorine School, 

307. 
Antonio a Stronconio : author of 

Umbria Serafica, 445. 
Apulia : Francis joins Papal army in, 

18 ; is made a Province, 205. 
Aristotelian philosophy : attitude of 

Church towards, 301. 
Arnold of Brescia: and the Pater- 

ini, 8. 
Ascoli : thirty clerics join Fraternity 

at, 165. 
Augustine, St. : Rule of, 176, 227. 

BALTIC FRIAR : his collection of docu 
ments, 437. 

Barbaro, Br. : joins the Fraternity, 59, 
75 ; accompanies Francis to the 
East, 232. 

Barbarossa, his policy : subordination 
of Church to Empire, 2. 

Barnabas, Br. : goes to Germany, 270. 

Bartholomew of Pisa : author of De 
Conformitate, 443. 

Beggars, Francis drawn to, 23. 

Benedict, Br. , of Pirato : writes Francis 
will and testament, 364. 

Benedict, St. : in the story of the 
Porziuncola, 46 ; his Rule, 176, 
227. 

Berardo, St. : martyred in Morocco, 
239. 

Bernard of Besse : legend by, 436. 

Bernard, Br. , da Quintavalle : joins the 
Fraternity, 52 ; in Florence, 70 ; is 
appointed Vicar, 76 ; is sent to 
Bologna, 154, 250 ; goes with 
Francis to Spain, 166 ; is sent to 
the Province of Spain, 207, 216 ; is 
comforted by Francis, 387. 

Bernard da Vigilanzio, Br. : joins the 
Fraternity, 75. 

Bernardone, Pietro : father of St. 
Francis, 4, 29. 

Bologna : Br. Bernard da Quintavalle is 
sent to, 154; Francis and the 
School of, 250, 300 seq. 
447 



448 



LIFE OF ST. FKANCIS OF ASSISI 



Bonaventure, St. : legends by, 429 
seq. 

Bonizzo, Br. : goes with Francis to 
Monte Rainerio, 320 ; goes with 
Francis to Monte Alvernia, 337. 

Buona Donna : a Franciscan penitent, 
289. 

Burkhardt, Abbot : witness to Francis 
can life, 113. 

C/ESAR, of Speyer, Br. : joins the Fra 
ternity, 238 ; meets Francis in East, 
238 ; accompanies Francis to Italy, 
241 ; assists Francis in re-writing 
the Kule, 263 ; leads the mission 
to Germany, 270. 

Calabria : is made a Province, 205. 

Casale, Monte : Francis and the robbers 
at, 190. 

Cathari : religious reformers, 8 ; their 
creed and teaching, 304. 

Celle, the : Francis founds friary of, 
153 ; Francis sick at, 36G. 

Cetona : Francis visits to, 153. 

Clare, St. ; vows herself to Christ and 
Poverty, 131; character of, 132 
sqq. ; seeks her liberty, 187 ; leaves 
her father s house, 138; goes to 
Benedictine Convent of San Paolo 
at Bastia, 138 ; leaves Convent of 
San Paolo for San Angelo, 139 ; is 
taken by Francis to San Damiano, 
141 ; her mode of life at San 
Damiano, 141 ; her influence on 
the destiny of the Fraternity, 144 ; 
seeks the "privilege of poverty" 
from Innocent III, 144 ; is com 
pelled to become Abbess, 145 ; 
her attitude to the Ugoline Consti 
tutions, 145, 147 ; secures formal 
confirmation of the " privilege " 
of poverty from Gregory IX, 146, 
247 ; her Rule approved of by 
Innocent IV, 148 ; her loyalty to 
the Franciscan ideal, 148 ; her 
sorrow and grief at Francis illness, 
384; receives a message from 
Francis, 385 ; her death, 148. 

Colombo, Fonte : vide Monte Rainerio. 

Columba, the lady : offers hospitality 
and a retreat to Francis, 320. 

Communes, Italian : their struggle for 
independence, 2 ; ambition of 
power, 3 ; internecine quarrels, 
100, 332 ; lack of individual liberty 
in, 288. 

Conrad of Lutzen : his character. 3 ; 
surrenders to Innocent III, 3. 

Conradin : Sultan of Damascus, 238. 



Cortona : Francis preaches at, 151 ; 
Elias builds church at, 261. 

Courtesy : a property of God, 152. 

Crescentius, Minister General : com 
missions Thomas of Celano to 
write legend, 427. 

Crucigeri : nursing brothers, 41. 

Crusades : their justification, 157 ; 
some causes of their failure, 178, 
237; Francis foretells defeat of, 
233. 

DALMATIA : Francis stranded in, 156, 

158. 
Damiano, San : church of, its antiquity, 

27. 
Damietta : Francis at, 233 ; the fall of, 

237. 
Diego, Bishop of Osima : goes with St. 

Dominic to preach against Albi- 

genses, 182. 
Dipold of Acerra: becomes Duke of 

Spoleto, 95. 
Dominic, St. : at the Lateran Council, 

180 ; his meeting with St. Francis, 

181 ; character and training of, 
182-3 ; founds the Order of 
Preachers, 183 ; the parting of 
St. Francis and, 185. 

ELIAS, Br. : joins the Fraternity, 153 ; 
Minister Provincial of Syria, 207 ; 
meets Francis at Acre, 238 ; ac 
companies Francis to Italy, 241 ; 
is appointed Vicar at the Porziun- 
cola, 256 ; the career of, 259 ; 
characteristics of, 260 ; opposi 
tion to Francis and the Primitive 
Rule, 266 ; policy of, 266 ; encour 
ages the desire for study, 298 ; his 
attitude to the new Rule, 321 ; 
refuses to obey, 324; receives a 
mysterious warning, 351 ; brings 
Francis from Siena, 365 ; is blessed 
by Francis, 375; constructs the 
great Church at Assisi, 391. 

Elizabeth, St., of Hungary : a Francis 
can penitent, 289. 

" FAC SECUNDUM EXEMPLAR ": collec 
tion of documents, 437. 

Fioretti : its history, 440. 

Florence : Br. Bernard da Quintavalle 
at, 70; St. Francis at, 211. 

Francis, St., Biography : characteris- 
ti&, 4 ; taken prisoner, 5 fmSiwiice 
oi troubadours on, 11 ; first illness 
of, 16; goes to join Papal army 
in Apulia, 18 ; first pilgrimage to 



INDEX 



449 



Borne, 23 ; repairs the Church I 
of San Damiano, 27 ; goes to | 
Gubbio, 38; repairs Church of j 
S. Maria della Porziuncola, 45 ; 
missiona