176 METROPOLITAN KAILWAY
great pleasure, and none more so than your own father, while
life is permitted him to enjoy the reflection of that day's
proceedings. ... I have had the opportunity of reading the
report of the proceedings (which I think correctly stated), and
especially your speech ; all parties who have read it seem to
make out that it was to the point, and the proper word, and
each word in its place.
" Your generosity in speaking of Mr. Johnson's great assist-
ance does credit alike to your head and your heart. Several
who have read your speech make the same remark as myself.
" And now, my dear John, I hope that the very high esti-
mation in which your friends and the public hold you, will
not have the effect to raise yourself nor any part of your family
in your own importance, but that you will keep that humble
and even path in life which has hitherto marked your progress
in all these matters. I beg to thank you for your kind and
pressing invitation to the opening, and I am glad I accepted
it. I believe I have not taken any cold, and am very well
this morning. ... " Yours affectionately,
"JOHN FOWLER.
"John Fowler, Esq."
A correspondent, Mr. Charles Stanley, writing con-
gratulations to Mr. Fowler on the opening of the
Metropolitan Railway, recalls a committee-room incident
of the year 1845 :—
"During the great parliamentary campaign of 1845, when
two rival lines were projected from Sheffield into Derbyshire,
I remember hearing you cross-examined as to one of them
which skirted the moors. 'I believe, Mr. Fowler/ said the
opposing counsel, 'your line goes by the name of the Grouse
and Trout Line.' 'Very likely/ you replied, 'and your line
is called the Flute Line, because it is nearly all tunnel/ It
is singular that you should have now sensibly added to your
fame by the construction of a line, the distinguishing charac-
teristic of which is that it is nearly all tunnel — in fact, a
genuine flute line."
SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENTS 177
With regard to the services of the late City solicitor,
Mr. Pearson, Mr. Fowler was much gratified in being
able to put in a favourable light the claims of his widow
on the Metropolitan Company and also on the Corpora-
tion, and among the letters preserved is a very grateful
acknowledgment of his kindness from Mrs. Pearson.
The work of Fowler in making the Metropolitan
Railway was a pioneer effort, and many improvements
have since been added to the business of tunnelling
under cities. The usefulness of a pioneer effort is
often, as we have already insisted, to be measured by
the rapidity and completeness with which its methods
are improved and superseded.
In the foregoing description of the Metropolitan
Railway we mentioned how important the engineers
considered it to complete the tunnel arch at as early
a point of the construction as possible. In the later
period of the work the arch was keyed and the soil
under the arch, "the dumpling," was removed after-
wards. In recent years the ^shield patented by Brunei .
as long ago as 1818 has been used with success for
the driving of iron tunnels through the bowels of the
earth at so low a depth that disturbance of the surface
and buildings no longer occurs. A steel cylinder forced
forward by hydraulic pressure prepares the way, and, as
the material is removed and the steel cylinder works
its way forward, an iron tunnel of a slightly smaller
diameter is put in its place. The space so left round
the outside of the iron tunnel is filled with a prepara-
tion of strong cement, forced in by compressed air
at a pressure of 50 Ibs. to the square inch. The whole
structure is thus sealed and completed with a minimum
of disturbance to existing buildings.
N
JL115KAK 1
SSIVER6ITY OF
DAVIS
LIFE OF SIR JOHN FOWLER
THE LIFE OF
SIR JOHN FOWLER
ENGINEER
BART., K.C.M.G., ETC.
BY THOMAS MACKAY
WITH EIGHTEEN ILLUSTRATIONS
LONDON
JOHN MURRAY, ALBEMARLE STREET
1900
LIBRARY
PLYMOUTH
WILLIAM BRENDON AND SON
PRINTERS
PREFACE
life of a great practical engineer, whose labours
cover the last sixty years of the nineteenth
century, might without irrelevance be made the
occasion of writing a history of modern engineering.
It was Sir John Fowler's business to utilise, in the
interest of his clients, the inventions and discoveries
of a most prolific half-century of progress, and an
enumeration of these would in itself constitute a
very complete chronicle of the advance of engineering
science.
In such a treatment of the subject the vastness
of the details must have overwhelmed the features of
any single personality, however eminent, and no such
ambitious task has here been attempted. It has been
the author's endeavour to sketch the lights and shades
of a strong and interesting character, and to indicate
the particular subdivision of scientific function to which
Sir John Fowler's energies were so successfully devoted.
A great organiser, like Sir John Fowler, appeals
perhaps less strongly to the imagination than the great
discoverer or inventor. Still, his work is an indis-
pensable element in that most important task — the
domestication of science for the public service. Our
vi PREFACE
conception of the industrial and commercial mechanism
of the age will be very incomplete, unless we realise
the part which is played by men like the subject of
this biography.
A large collection of letters and papers has been
placed in the author's hands by Lady Fowler. To her
and to other members of the late Sir John Fowler's
family he is much indebted for information, suggestions,
and corrections. He has also to acknowledge valuable
assistance given by the late Mr. Baldry, and by Sir
Benjamin Baker, Sir John Fowler's partners. The
kindness with which all his inquiries have been met
has, he hopes, enabled him to overcome, in some
degree, two great disadvantages : one that he did not
know Sir John Fowler personally, the other that he is
not an engineer.
The work of preparing the following narrative has
been full of interest. An experience such as that of
Sir John Fowler is a most important chapter of in-
dustrial history, and the author can only hope that
in his presentation of the facts the interest has not
been allowed entirely to evaporate.
CONTENTS
CHAPTER I.
EARLY LIFE
PAGE
Birth— Parentage— Wadsley Hall — Education— Choice of a pro-
fession— Story-telling — Apprenticeship with Mr. Leather — Early
opposition to Railways — First departure from home — Search
for employment — Mr. Rastrick — Birmingham — London — A visit
to Maidenhead Bridge . . ... 1
CHAPTER II.
SUBORDINATE EMPLOYMENTS
Termination of first engagement with Mr. Rastrick — His younger
brothers — Re-engagement with Mr. Rastrick — Surveying in
Cumberland — Morecambe Bay — Plans for the future — Stockton
and Hartlepool Railway — Parliamentary business — First engage-
ments . . . . ... 35
CHAPTER III.
THE RAILWAY ENGINEER, 1844-1850
Mr. Fowler sets up in business for himself — List of engagements —
Parliamentary Committees — Expert witnesses — The Railway
mania — Demand for Engineers — Manchester, Sheffield, and
Lincolnshire Railway — The Great Central — Railway politics —
The duty of an Engineer — Mr. Sidney's ride — Railways and
agriculture — New Holland — Torksey Bridge — Article on Rail-
way accidents . . . . 59
CHAPTER IV.
PROFESSIONAL CHARACTERISTICS AND WORK, 1850-1860
The modern engineer — Fowler's power of organisation — Success an
index of worth — Fowler's professional courage — His subordinates
—His partner, Mr. Baldry — Marriage — Early home — Mr. Hudson
— Proposal to stand for Parliament — His industry — Ireland —
Irish Railways — Other works . . ... 105
viii CONTENTS
CHAPTER V.
THE NENE IMPROVEMENT AND NORFOLK ESTUARY
Nene improvement — The Fens — The Nene outfall — Operations at
Wisbech — Mr. Fowler's speech on Arterial Drainage — The
Norfolk Estuary— Grunty Fen . . ... 134
CHAPTER VI.
METROPOLITAN RAILWAY
Earlier proposals — Committee on Metropolitan Communications —
Mr. Fowler's evidence — The Report — The State and Railways —
The work begun— The cost — The underground rivers— Levels
and gradients — Archaeological discoveries — Methods of construc-
tion— Ventilation — Mr. Fowler's letter — The opening ceremony
— Letter to Mr. Gladstone — Congratulations — Subsequent de-
velopments . . . . ... 145
CHAPTER VII.
PRESIDENT OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS
Visit to Glasgow Waterworks — Dunrobin — Fowler as Volunteer —
President of the Institution — His address — Cooper's Hill — Visit
to India — A great organiser . . . . ' . 179
CHAPTER VIII.
MR. FOWLER AND GENERAL GARIBALDI: AN EPISODE
Roman Floods — The Engineering problem — Garibaldi's proposal —
Fowler's interview with Garibaldi — His letter — Mr. Wilson's
Report — Mr. Fowler's diplomatic success . . . 193
CHAPTER IX.
A PROPOSAL FOR A CHANNEL FERRY
International Communications Bill — Water Station at Dover — Bill
passes the Commons and is rejected in the Lords — Mr. Fowler's
disappointment . . . ... 203
CHAPTER X.
EGYPT
Fowler's power of enjoyment — His love of society — Arrival in
Egypt — Is introduced to Khedive — Visits the Pyramids — His
opinion on ancient Egyptian workmanship — Letter to a child —
Travels with the Prince of Wales — Visits Suez Canal — Appointed
Engineer to Khedive — The Pax Britannica — Sugar — Soudan
Railway — Navigation of the Nile — Gordon — Construction of
Railway discontinued — Letters from Gordon — A Sweet- water
Canal — Lecture on Egypt — Irrigation — Barrage — Cleopatra's
Needle — Finance — Ismail deposed — Letter from Lord Wolseley
— Visits to Australia and India . 212
CONTENTS ix
CHAPTER XL
THE FORTH BRIDGE
PAGE
The Firth of Forth— The old passage— Sir T. Bouch— Cantilever
principle — The demand of the time — The cost — The foundations
— Caissons — Wind pressure — Workshops at Queensferry — Build-
ing out the cantilevers — The central girder — The rocking pillar
—Directors and staff — Sir John on the materials — Opening
ceremony — Sir John's speech — Sir Benjamin Baker's reply to
Mr. Morris — Letter from Mr. Waterhouse, R.A. . . . 276
CHAPTER XII.
THE ENGINEER AT HOME
Private and public life — Friends and amusements— The making of
Braemore — The Engineer as Highland laird — As yachtsman —
His hospitality — A visitor's reminiscence — His admiration of
intellect — Political views — Letters to the Times on Egypt — Candi-
date for Hallamshire — Views on Crofter and Deer Forest questions
— His recreations and tastes — As chairman of a learned society —
Letter from Sir Benjamin Baker — Last days — The greatness of
the Arts of Peace 318
APPENDIX
Address of John Fowler, Esq., President of the Institution of Civil
Engineers, on taking the chair, for the first time after his
election, January 9th, 1866 . . ... 365
INDEX 393
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
SIR JOHN FOWLER, from a photograph by Messrs. Elliott and Fry Frontispiece
THE VICTORIA BRIDGE, PIMLICO . . . To face page 132
THE MAKING OF THE METROPOLITAN RAILWAY . . ,, 166
A TRIAL TRIP ON THE METROPOLITAN RAILWAY . ,, 172
SIR JOHN FOWLER, from a portrait by Sir J. E. Millais, P.R.A., in the
Institution of Civil Engineers . . . To face page 184
MODEL OF THE CHANNEL FERRY STEAMER . . ,, 205
FACSIMILE OF LETTER FROM GENERAL GORDON TO MR. FOWLER Page 253
PLAN OF PROPOSED SWEET- WATER SHIP-CANAL . . To face page 256
A LIVING MODEL OF THE FORTH BRIDGE . . „ 282
INCHGARVIE MAIN PIER . . . ,, 300
THE FORTH BRIDGE FROM THE SOUTH-EAST . . ,, 303
THE I'ORTH BRIDGE FROM THE SOUTH-WEST . . „ 311
THE FORTH BRIDGE — METHOD OF ERECTION . . ,, 315
THE HOUSE OF BRAEMORE . . . „ 322
CORRIE-HALLOCH, BRAEMORE . . . ,, 325
THE RECREATIONS OF A STATESMAN, from a sketch by Sir J. E.
Millais, P.R.A. . . . . . To face page 328
STAGS AND HINDS, from a sketch by Sir E. Landseer, R.A. . ,, 328
SIR JOHN FOWLER AND HIS ELDEST GRANDSON . . ,, 335
THE FINDHORN VIADUCT 358
LIFE
OF
SIR JOHN FOWLER
CHAPTER I.
EARLY LIFE
JOHN FOWLER, the subject of this biography, was
born at his father's house, Wadsley Hall, near
Sheffield, on the 15th of July, 1817. For more than
200 years the Fowler family had been connected with
Wincobank, a district called after the hill of that name
in the neighbourhood of Sheffield. John Fowler the
father, himself the son of a John Fowler of Winco-
bank, was brought to be baptised at Ecclesfield Church
on the 18th of June, 1784. Though living all his life
in the neighbourhood of Sheffield, he never became
closely connected with the mineral industries of the
district. In early life he was among the young
patriots of the day who took an active part in forming
a regiment of volunteers to resist the French invasion
threatened by Napoleon. At the age of nineteen he
was lieutenant and quartermaster in a band of 200
raised in the neighbourhood of Ecclesfield. A false
alarm, caused by the accidental lighting of a beacon
B
2 EAELY LIFE
fire, called out the regiment and marched them off to
the east coast. This military incident in an otherwise
uneventful life was often the subject of some pleasant
merriment in the family circle, and as late as 1868 the
old gentleman wrote a brief account of the bloodless
career of the Ecclesfield volunteers, which Dr. Gatty
has incorporated in his edition of Hunter's History of
Hallamshire.
For five years Mr. Fowler gave close attention to his
military duties ; he then retired and applied himself
to his profession, that of a land surveyor. It is
pleasant to think that within sound of the whirr
and grinding of the Sheffield machinery it was pos-
sible for one whose tastes lay in that direction to
win competence and reputation from the ancient
industry of the land, and to rear a family of healthy
and stalwart sons ready to play their part in the careers
which economic changes rendered for them inevitable.
His residence of Wadsley Hall was the place where
the courts of the manor of Wadsley were held, a link
with the vanishing order of things, yet standing on the
confines of the new industry, and soon to be the birth-
place of one who played an important part in the
economic revolution which was then pending. The
elder Fowler could resist the attraction which has ever
been drawing the population from the country and its
pursuits to the town, and to the triumphs, the suffer-
ings, and the still unsolved problems of the modern
industrial system. John Fowler the son, as we shall
presently see, eagerly and confidently and with a real
enjoyment of work and struggle, threw himself into
the stream of the new industry, and was carried to
successes typical not only of the noble profession which
PAKENTAGE 3
he had embraced, but indicative also of high personal
qualities of courage, endurance, and skill.
To return, however, to his parentage. John Fowler
the elder married on the 24th of December, 1815,
Miss Elizabeth Swann, daughter of William Swann of
Dykes Hall. In a letter, written at the time of his
wife's death, to his daughter-in-law (wife of Sir John
Fowler), Mr. Fowler recounts the history of his two
years' courtship and of his marriage on Christmas Eve
to Miss Swann ; he relates how they decided to remain
in his home at Wadsley instead of spending the honey-
moon in travel, and how, in the drawing-room of the
bride's new home, after the wedding guests had gone,
he offered a prayer, specially prepared by himself for
the occasion. This prayer found its answer in many
long years of happy married life.
Mrs. Fowler belonged to the generation which valued
highly the arts of the good housewife, and in these she
excelled. To her intelligence and capacity were due
the admirable arrangements for the comfort of the
large family circle at Wadsley Hall. Her husband,
who inherited from his father a fine physique and a
stature of six feet, was a man of amiable and most
trustworthy character. So highly esteemed was his
probity, that he not infrequently was asked to act as
sole valuator by contending parties. His habits of life
were most methodical ; up to the last year of his life
he never retired to rest without making a personal
inspection of his farm premises, in order to see that
every animal had received its proper share of attention.
To this couple was born on the 15th of July, 1817,
the subject of this biography, John Fowler the
engineer. Other children came in due course :
4 EARLY LIFE
William, who established large ironworks near Chester-
field ; Henry, an engineer, who died on his return from
India, comparatively young ; Charles, an architect, who
emigrated to Australia ; Robert, a solicitor in West-
minster; and Frederick, who succeeded to and ex-
tended the paternal business ; one daughter married
Mr. Whitton, government engineer of railways in New
South Wales ; a second married Captain Holmes, of
Norfolk ; a third remained unmarried in attendance on
her father. Mrs. Fowler, the mother, died on the
5th of June, 1858. Her husband survived her for
many years, and died on the 19th of August, 1872, in
his eighty-ninth year.1*
Mr. Fowler the elder was an energetic man of
business, but his interests lay somewhat apart from the
new industry. The career of John Fowler the son was
mapped out by himself. His early letters to his father,
though testifying to his filial affection and respect,
rarely ask for advice, but exhibit a confident, self-
reliant tone which is not a little remarkable in one so
young. The son, soon immersed in the restless whirl
of the new industry, is fond of poking a little kindly
* The Rev. J. EASTWOOD, in his learned History of the Parish of Ecchs-
field (1862), gives some additional genealogical details. "Wadsley Hall,"
he says, "was rebuilt in 17:22 by Charles Burton ; it has been for the last
forty-seven years in the occupation of John Fowler, Esq., whose family
sprang from Wincohank in this parish. Joshua Fowler (born at Wim'o-
bank and baptised at Ecclesfield in 1678) died April 27th, 1742. His son
Samuel married, November llth, 1731, Hannah, daughter of William
Dixon, of Shiregreen, and died April 6th, 1760. John, the son of Samuel,
born at Wincobank in 1746, married Hannah AVi-bster (who died January
25th, 1829, aged seventy-four), and died May 25th, 1808. Their son was
the present Mr. Fowler, whose wife Elizabeth, daughter of William Swann
of Dykes Hall, died June 5th, 1858, aged sixty-six, leaving a numrrous
family, the eldest of whom is John Fowler of Queen Square Place,
minster, a distinguished engineer," etc., etc. (p. 448).
ECCLESFIELD 5
fun at the stay-at-home instincts of his parents,
coupled with genuine expressions of regret that they
cannot summon up energy to visit him at some of the
temporary halting-places to which his professional en-
gagements called him. The correspondence between
father and son was continued to the end of the former's
long life. There will be occasion to quote from it in
the course of this narrative ; one point, however, may
here be noticed.
It was a characteristic of the younger man that he
always sought to make men talk on their own subjects.
In his letters to his father, more especially in later
years, when his professional engagements carried him
to the ends of the earth — to Spain, to Egypt, and to
India — his familiar talk (for the family letter is a
species of familiar talk) to his father is not of bridges
and railways and hydraulic power, but of cattle and
horses and agriculture.
This trait may perhaps appear again. Here it has
only been noticed to mark by the son's testimony what
we believe to have been the principal secular interest
in his father's life.
The parish of Ecclesfield is for the most part a bleak
moorland country, now much encroached upon by the
advancing town. Eoger Dods worth, the Yorkshire
topographer, visited Ecclesfield Church in 1628, and
describes it as follows : —
"This church is called and that deservedly by the vulgar
the Mynster of the Moores, being the fairest church for stone,
wood, glass and neat keeping that ever I came in of country
churches."
To this church, for many years after their marriage,
Mr. and Mrs. Fowler used to ride across the fields
6 EARLY LIFE
Sunday after Sunday, mounted on an old-fashioned
pillion saddle. John Fowler, their eldest child, ac-
quired by inheritance the vigour of a family reared for
generations in this upland country. The Yorkshireman
of the moors has the hardiness of his surroundings, but
he lives too near the stir of the great world to entertain
for long any of the dreamy listlessness often character-
istic of those who, like the Highlander, are entirely
secluded from the modern spirit. The family were in
easy though not affluent circumstances. There was no
question of the future engineer being made an eldest
son, and so deprived of the inspiriting responsibility of
earning his own living. At the same time he was not
stinted of the sound but not ornamental education
which was then available for the middle and pro-
fessional classes of the country.
At the age of nine John Fowler was sent to Whitley
Hall, a private school near Ecclesfield, kept by Mr.
Eider. Mr. Eider is described in Mr. Eastwood's
book as one " under whose gentle but efficient guidance
many of the principal young men of the neighbourhood
received their education."
With regard to his school days, Sir John Fowler in
late life wrote down the following reminiscence, which
is best given in his own words :—
" I remember two incidents there — one, being teased by an
elder boy until a fight took place, when the elder boy had two
front teeth knocked out. The mother of the boy was sent for,
and a scene and examination occurred, resulting in my acquittal
of all blame and my resolution never to fight again — a resolu-
tion I kept through life.
" Another incident was a fall from a wall and a cut on the
eyebrows, leaving a well-defined cross, ever afterwards to be
visible, by which I could be identified.
SCHOOL DAYS 7
" At this early age I began a habit of telling stories in bed,
which I invented in the dormitory where there were several
boys, and gradually acquired such proficiency in making them
more and more horrible until timid boys sometimes wept.
Unfortunately one of the masters happened to hear something
going on, and listened, and heard what induced him to put
a stop to my improvising, or I might have acquired some
curious proficiency.
" I shall never forget an attempt to frighten me by a big
boy coming into the bedroom one night wrapped in a sheet,
with a large hollow turnip on the top of his head and a lighted
candle inside. I threw a pillow so well that the boy and
candle upset, and the boy himself was so frightened that he
screamed loudly and brought up the master, and we all got
a tremendous lecture.
" I was active and strong, and could throw a cricket ball
further than any boy of my age, and was soon very much
devoted to the game. I never became scientific, but was a
hard hitter and a fast bowler; and my last stroke before
giving up the game altogether was breaking a window of the
parlour of Lord's cricket ground.*
" I was fairly quick in elementary scholarship, and in mental
arithmetic was decidedly beyond the average of boys and men
— a gift which was of great convenience and value in after life.
" It was not my good fortune to be at a great public school
or at either of the Universities.
" I was always deeply interested in engineering, both in
books and works, and- was so fixed in my determination about
my future career that at the early age of sixteen I persuaded
my father to allow me to become a pupil to Mr. J. T. Leather,
who was engineer of the Sheffield Waterworks. This was
fortunate for my future career, as I had a thorough training
* A letter of congratulation from his old friend Mr. Bernard Wake,
written to him on his being made a baronet in 1890, recalls to Sir John's
recollection " their sprightly movements to Hyde Park, Sheffield, to play
cricket at six o'clock in the morning." This "peep-of-day cricket" Mr.
Wake dates about the year 1834.
8 EARLY LIFE
in waterworks engineering, and set out and superintended in
my capacity of pupil the Rivelin and Crookes reservoirs of the
company, and all the business of pipe testing and pipe laying
in every detail.
"During my pupilage I was frequently at Leeds with
Mr. Leather's uncle, who was engineer of the Great Aire and
Calder Navigation, Goole Docks, etc., to give him assistance
when he was much pressed with professional work.
"The result being that my early training was exclusively
waterworks and hydraulic engineering; and before I was
nineteen I was a good engineering surveyor and leveller, could
set out works, and measure them up for certificates to be paid
to contractors."
This record of a healthy, happy boyhood, of a brief
and by no means richly endowed school career, to be
followed by a cycle of busy and yet joyous apprentice
years, is commonplace enough. " Scientific " athleticism
had not yet become a part of the school curriculum,
and juvenile philanthropy was as yet unknown. There
was no sign then of that introspective melancholy and
sentiment which leads boys of this later generation to
expend their energies in the study of social problems.
Young Fowler's surroundings, if not romantic, were sane
and healthy. There were no misgivings in the air as to
the soundness of the economic foundations of society.
The future successful captain of industry was not one to
allow his mind to be * ' sicklied o'er with the pale cast
of thought," and if misgiving ever occurred to him, his
robust common sense would probably have told him
that the career of a successful engineer (and of that
his confident nature never doubted) would contribute
more to the happiness and well-being of the world
than many projects of philanthropy. To bring pure
water to towns, to design works which would give
CHOICE OF PROFESSION 9
employment to thousands, to abolish distance by means
of improved locomotion, to make a home that should
be a centre of domestic happiness, were objects which
at that day appealed to and satisfied the generous
instincts of youthful ambition. The air of Yorkshire
and the neighbourhood of Sheffield were not favourable
to brooding over the Welt-Schmerz. When Thoreau
went out from the commercial atmosphere of an
American city for which he had no taste, and set up
his abode in a hut by the Lake of Walden, a life
which he has immortalised in a charming fragment of
autobiography, there were those of his fellow-townsmen
who asked why, if the superfluities of civilisation were
distasteful to him, he did not support an orphan. Such
questions and such problems were not raised in York-
shire in the early thirties. Young Fowler became an
engineer because in the immediate future that pro-
fession seemed likely to be busy beyond all others.
Neither sentimentalism nor an abnormally developed
athleticism tempted him to decline his part in the
workaday world, and the people of Sheffield, at that
time at all events, did not put forward the claim of
orphans. He became an engineer because it was the
obvious thing to do, and he thoroughly enjoyed it.
In addition to the " elementary scholarship," to
which allusion is made, there certainly was added a
careful and reverent study of the Bible. Like many
greater and smaller men, Fowler all his life was
reticent on religious subjects, but throughout his
correspondence, more especially in the letters written
from Egypt many years afterwards, there is abundant
evidence that he knew his Bible.
His scholarly equipment may have been narrow,
10 EAKLY LIFE
viewed in the light of modern educational theories ;
but it was sufficient to enable him to write a terse
and vigorous style. The corrections which occur in
his familiar correspondence are convincing evidence of
a true literary instinct. Lucidity in even his most
hurried composition is never wanting, and such cor-
rections as are made are directed to the attainment of
greater simplicity in the structure of a sentence and
to a severe excision of redundancy of expression. As
a result, his all too infrequent contributions on en-
gineering matters to the Press and to periodical
literature are admirable examples of popular scientific
exposition.
It is a tradition in Sir John Fowler's family that
as a child and a boy he was remarkable for his
destructive habits. As the principal work of his life
was to be construction on the largest and most suc-
cessful scale, the contradiction is quoted to illustrate
one of the generalisations of Froebel, viz. that the
destructive faculty of youth can be trained and con-
verted into the constructive talent of the adult and
fully civilised man. Carefully considered in the light
of evolutionary theory the paradox becomes a truism.
Civilisation is the record of the conversion of those
human instincts which Professor Huxley has described
as those of the tiger and the ape into qualities
appropriate to, or at least not incompatible with, our
associated life, and it is a fact well known to biologists
that the young of species show, even physically, traces
of remote ancestry which disappear or become modified
past recognition in the fully grown adult.
Fowler's childish success as a story-teller attests his
youthful power of imagination. It might seem, and,
IMAGINATION AND SCIENCE 11
indeed, he almost suggests it himself, that this talent
received no further development. This we believe to
be a mistake. Some years ago Professor Tyndall chose
as the subject of his presidential address to the British
Association the use of the imagination in science. We
do not think that a better instance can be found for
illustrating the usefulness of the imaginative faculty
in science than that which is contained in the history
of engineering.
"The civil engineer," says Sir John Fowler in his presi-
dential address to the Institute, "should have a correct
appreciation of the objects of each work contemplated as
well as their true values, so that sound advice may be given
as to the best means of attaining them."
To do this successfully demands some exercise of the
imaginative faculty.
The imagination of the novelist and the poet, the
"makar," as the old Scots phrase runs, has at its
disposal time and space and powers natural and super-
natural. The engineer works within narrower limits.
Like the artist, he desires to produce a given effect ;
he has to consider different combinations of material
and alternatives of design, and at times he has to
contrive some new and previously unattempted ex-
pedient, and then (and this is by no means the least
important part of his function) he has to clothe his
conception in language and form which shall be con-
vincing to capitalists, to railway directors, and, if
compulsory powers are needed, to Parliament.
To use the language of a current controversy, it is
largely the ''ability" of the engineer which sets in
motion the vast operations of modern industry. At
12 EAKLY LIFE
the same time that ability is limited by the materials
available, by the demands of the public, by the willing-
ness or unwillingness of the capitalist community to
make the gigantic effort which is necessary for the vast
conceptions of modern engineering, and generally by
the circumstances of the moment.
The true nature of the part played by the imagination
of the great engineer in the history of progress can be
well illustrated if we regard the confluence of causes
and suggestion that led to the making of the Forth
Bridge.
The comparatively simple principle of the cantilever,
known and utilised in the oldest form of bridge building,
the supply of cheap steel by means of the Bessemer
process, the existence of wealthy trading populations
on each side of a great tidal estuary, the convenience
and economy of conveying goods and passengers over
this without " breaking bulk," the existence of great
railway companies with vast traffic ready to be carried
over the bridge, — in a word, the demand for such a
bridge, — the readiness of resourceful contractors and
armies of experienced workmen, the existence of a
tribunal capable of appreciating the value and practi-
cability of the proposal, and authorised to grant the
necessary compulsory powers — such was the "hour."
The man or the men who added to this accumulation
the vital spark of their ability were the engineers
whose business it was to explain how under these
conditions the thing was to be done. In that vast
subdivision of labour which is characteristic of
modern industry, the part which is assigned first to
the imagination, and then to the practical . skill of the
engineer, is as honourable and as truly originating as
HIS FIKST APPRENTICESHIP 13
is, in the nature of things, vouchsafed to any form of
human effort.
Fowler's connection with the Leathers was a very
pleasant one, and was the means of introducing him
to the great industry of railway extension, then in its
infancy. In a letter to his father he speaks gratefully
of Mr. J. Towlerton Leather's kindness, and adds that
he looks on him as his pater secundus. His occasional
transference to the service of the uncle, Mr. George
Leather, gave him his first experience in railway work,
and on an occasion which is of considerable historic
interest.
The great George Stephenson, as can now be seen
by every tyro, attached at this period what has proved
to be an exaggerated importance to ease of gradients,
and insisted on taking the line of rail, which after-
wards was known as the Midland, down the valleys
formed by the tributaries of the Trent, from Derby
to Normanton. By this policy the new highway left
on one side the important towns of Sheffield, Barnsley,
and Wakefield. At this juncture Mr. George Leather
was called into consultation by the Sheffield people.
The result may be described in the language of the
learned historian of Sheffield, Dr. Gatty, the Vicar of
Ecclesfield, the editor and continuator of Hunter's
Hallamshire : —
"Strong opposition was offered to this design, and a rival
line proposed similar to that which is now being effected, which
would come directly from Chesterfield and Sheffield; whilst
the immediate extra cost which would have been incurred
would probably have been small compared with that of the
expedients to which the town was ultimately driven by the
adoption of Stephenson's plan. When the effort to divert
14 EARLY LIFE
the Midland line favourably to Sheffield from its valley course,
and the counter proposal under Mr. Leather's advice was
rejected, a survey was made of the country betwixt Sheffield
and Manchester, passing through Wharncliffe Wood, where
much engineering difficulty was encountered. In the severe
labour of this survey Mr. John Fowler, then a pupil of
Mr. Leather, first acquired his practical knowledge. He
assisted Mr. Yignoles in the arduous task of ascertaining the
practicability of a route through a district abounding with
much natural obstruction, and had ample opportunity of
preparing himself for his great local work, subsequently
undertaken, of selecting and constructing the large group of
railways, now known as the Manchester, Sheffield, and
Lincolnshire line."
Fowler's own brief account of the transaction is
given in the autobiographical sketch :—
" But a great change in my professional life was to take
place before my pupilage was completed. The Stephensons
projected the Midland Eailway, and as it was proposed to
pass at a distance from Sheffield, the Sheffield people opposed
it in Parliament, and employed Mr. Leather to represent them,
and as a matter of course I was set to work to discover
alternative lines to put Sheffield on the main line. But all in
vain. Stephenson carried everything before him, and Sheffield
was put on a branch. This has since been remedied, and
Sheffield is now on the main line of the Midland Eailway."
The branch line which first connected Sheffield with
the main railway system was the Sheffield and Eother-
ham line. In a letter addressed to his father in
November, 1838, the young engineer, whose pro-
fessional pride seems to have been wounded, writes
with much contempt of the tall talk, as it seemed to
him, indulged in by Earl Fitzwilliam and George
Stephenson at the opening of this diminutive line.
MR GEOEGE LEATHEE 15
He has read, he says, with great regret that his uncle
had countenanced by his presence the vainglorious
proceedings of the opening day. The slight to his
native Sheffield, and to Mr. Leather's alternative lines,
roused a fine partisan spirit, which must have seemed
very diverting to the writer when a perusal of his
boyish letter recalled this long -forgotten indignity.
Fowler was not a man to attach undue importance
to the foibles and errors of great men, of which the
history of engineering affords many curious instances ;
yet there is a note of pardonable satisfaction and pride
in his record of the fact that as a boy he had con-
tended, and not idly or ingloriously, with the great
pioneer of railway engineering.
In this connection it is interesting to note that his
chief, Mr. George Leather, then so busily engaged in
extending facilities of railway transport, had at one
time been altogether incredulous as to the value of
Stephenson's locomotive.
"Mr. George Leather, C.E.," says Mr. Smiles in his famous
biography of Stephenson, "the engineer of the Croydon and
Wandsworth Eailway, on which he said the waggons went
at from 2J to 3 miles an hour, also gave his evidence
against the practicability of Mr. Stephenson's plan. He
considered his estimate 'a very wild one.' He had no
confidence in locomotive power. The Weardale Eailway, of
which he was engineer, has given up the use of locomotive
engines. He supposed that, when used, they travelled at
3| to 4 miles an hour, because they were considered to be
then more effective than at a higher speed."
Such was the opinion of Mr. Leather in the year 1825,
when he gave evidence on the Liverpool and Manchester
Eailway Bill. *
* See SMILES'S Stepkemon, p. 242.
16 EAKLY LIFE
Fowler's early letters to his father and the auto-
biographical sketch give us a few incidents and general
descriptions of the work of an engineering pupil in the
thirties which are of considerable interest. The hours
of work were long.
" If I had to go seven miles to the works and back I
walked, as the company could not afford a conveyance. If
I had to get lunch at an inn, the company's limit was one
shilling; and if the work was urgent, to finish drawings or
specifications on a certain day, we constantly worked twelve
hours a day. This was severe early training, but it had much
to do with my success as an engineer in after life, as I was
better prepared to avail myself of opportunities at twenty-
one than most young men now are at nearly thirty.
"But I was strong, and never ill or tired in those young
days, and very full of fun. I remember on one occasion
Mr. James Falshaw (who was one of Mr. George Leather's
assistants, and afterwards Sir James Falshaw, Lord Provost
of Edinburgh) and I were walking in the neighbourhood of
Leeds. I suddenly said to him, 'Falshaw, I will throw you
over that gate.' He replied, 'Fowler, you can't.' I instantly
took him in my arms and did throw him over the gate. He
was fond of telling this story against me when he was Lord
Provost of Edinburgh, and especially to any of my sons."
"At this time," the autobiography relates, "landowners
were violently opposed to surveys being made across their
property, and resisted it by physical force as well as by the
law, and of course we engineers endeavoured to dodge them.
I remember on one occasion I was taking levels along a public
road to accomplish my object, when one of the landowner's
servants stood before my level and obstructed my sight, and
declared he had a legal right to stand where he pleased on
a public road. On this, one of my stalwart assistants inquired
if he also had a right to stand or walk where he pleased on
a public road. Unthinkingly the landowner's man admitted
that any man had such legal right. 'Then/ said my man,
OPPOSITION TO EAILWAYS 17
' my right is here, and if you obstruct me I shall remove you J ;
and walking up to the man, he took him in his arms and de-
posited him in a ditch. I am not lawyer enough to know
which was right in law, but I got my levels. Curious ques-
tions of law such as this sometimes arise, which can only be
settled by force or demonstration of force."
Force and demonstration of force do not necessarily
result in equity, nor in the triumph of the representa-
tive of progress. Lord Galway, a redoubtable Nimrod
who lived on the borders of Yorkshire and Nottingham-
shire, was at this time a violent opponent of the railway
system. "Mr. Brundell of Doncaster," says Mr. Grin-
ling in his excellent History of the Great Northern
Railway, p. 76, " relates that he was horsewhipped by
this Lord Galway when surveying for the original
London and York line between Blyth and Tickhill."
To return to young Mr. Fowler : —
" On this same survey," he continues, " I arrived in the
evening at a well-known inn, and expressed a wish to have
dinner. The landlady said she had not a single thing in the
house except two geese which were being roasted for one of
Mr. Stephenson's assistants, who was engaged on the line, and
would soon be back. ' But why two geese ? ' I said. * Oh,
well/ she said, 'he only cares about one special bit, and it
requires two geese to give him his dinner.' 'Well, my good
woman,' I said, ' I mean to have one of these geese, and shall
take it when cooked; and I am prepared to commit a crime
if anyone attempts to prevent me.' She was then ready to
give me the goose. I took it, and left a note of apology,
which was laughingly acknowledged as being morally, if not
legally right."
These incidents, trifling in themselves, mark the long-
span of time covered by the professional career of Sir
c
18 EARLY LIFE
John Fowler. When he began life the railway engineer
was looked on as an interloper and an outlaw, and, as
has well been said in a notice of the subject of this
book, recorded in the Minutes of the Institution of
Civil Engineers —
" An independent professional career, commencing before the
railway mania, and extending some years beyond the comple-
tion of the Forth Bridge, is indeed a notable record, and it
is scarcely possible that one quite like it will ever occur again."
The young engineer appears to have left his father's
roof for the first time about the middle of October,
18^84, when he was seventeen years of age. The first
letter which has come into his biographer's hand is
addressed to his father, and is dated from Park Terrace,
Leeds, on October 18th, 1834. A few characteristic
sentences of it are quoted :—
" DEAR FATHER, — You would be rather surprised in arriving
at home on Wednesday to hear I had taken my journeyings
to this town ; but as I had before told you that it was likely
that I should have to come over, you would not think so much
about it. The purpose for which I came is the preparing
plans, sections, specifications, etc., for a most immense ship
lock at Goole — the largest in the world — other locks, bridges,
and three miles of canal, all for the Aire and Calder Naviga-
tion, at a cost of about £100,000. Mr. George Leather is
engineer for that Company, but as yet I have done nothing
but copy the specifications — a job I don't much like, but it
must be done.
"I have seen very little indeed of Leeds yet, as we work
rather long hours — seven in the morning to about half-past ten
at night — but what I have seen of it, and I believe it to be
the best part of the town, has not prepossessed me with it ...
decidedly inferior to Sheffield ... the shopkeepers not so
FIKST DEPARTUKE FKOM HOME 19
polite and accommodating as at Sheffield. . . . To-morrow
being Sunday, and as I shall not have another opportunity,
I intend to go down the railway to Selby, 20 miles. If I
get an opportunity I purpose seeing through a cloth factory
before I come back. . . ."
The remainder of the letter is devoted to some
domestic details as to shirts and the key of his carpet
bag.
On November 4th of the same year, 1834, he writes
again from Leeds a long letter to his father, who had
apparently consulted him about some pumping opera-
tions pending at one of Messrs. Greaves' mines in the
neighbourhood of his home : —
"I hasten, in accordance with your wish, to answer by
return of post. You have not acknowledged the receipt of
a letter I sent per Mr. Leather, but I presume it has arrived
safe ; it was not of any consequence. Mr. Leather as well as
yourself know far better than I do of any arguments (though
I think it needs none) to show that pumping to the level
is preferable to pumping to the surface, but as it is a subject
about which I feel considerably interested I feel flattered by
your writing. The argument to which I particularly wished
to draw your attention, and by you the attention of the
Messrs. Greaves, is the amount which might be expended
on the level before it would be on a worse footing than
pumping to the surface." Then follows an elaborate esti-
mate of two different proposals for draining the mine.
" The preceding calculations are not random statements
. . . but are the result of calculations (nice and par-
ticular ones too)." He concludes with a hope that his
father "will pour into Messrs. Greaves' ears such thundering
arguments as will not fail to carry conviction to their
minds and (oblige them to) see the danger to which they
have been exposed."
20 EAELY LIFE
These two letters record what possibly was our young
engineer's first sight of a railway and also the delivery
of his first professional report. His employments with
Mr. J. T. Leather, of the Sheffield Waterworks, and
Mr. George Leather, of the Aire and Calder Navigation,
continued without recorded incident till, in June, 1836,
we hear of him in Birmingham, where he finds " the
population, traffic, and works of all kinds, not merely
in the town, but for miles on all sides, most astonish-
ing." The town, he says, is pretty and clean, and there
is as much bustle as at Manchester, without any of its
disagreeableness.
""We are engaged seeking out a line of railway between
Birmingham and Stourbridge, a town about 12 miles from
Birmingham, and the last two days Mr. Leather and I have
been engaged in taking levels in various directions by way of
trying the country ; we almost expect the line will have to be
continued forwards to Worcester, but we have not yet got
particular instructions."
On June 5th, 1836, he writes a somewhat fuller
account of his employment as follows : —
"A railway was last year applied for and an Act obtained
for a line between Birmingham and Gloucester; but as it
passes throughout its whole distance in a barren country (as
to minerals), a number of gentlemen in Birmingham are
working to get a railway between the same points, but passing
through the rich mineral districts of Dudley and Stourbridge
and joining the original line at or near Worcester, and have
employed Mr. Leather to find out a line for them, and he,
conceiving your son might be serviceable, imported him
accordingly. But in addition to this competing line, another
company has been got up to make a line nearly the same
as ours; so that you perceive there is at all events in this
SEARCH FOR EMPLOYMENT 21
case fair competition and no monopoly. We are now engaged
taking running levels along the roads, etc., with a view of
accurately ascertaining the heights of the different parts of the
country, as I should imagine that without exception there is
not in England so difficult a country to get a good line of
railway through, not even in the neighbourhood of Sheffield."
In these and other employments the young engineer
learnt the practical details of his profession, and a year
later, a few days after he had completed his nine-
teenth year, we find him writing from the Birkenhead
Hotel on July 18th, 1837 :—
" MY DEAR FATHER, — As I daresay you will have no objec-
tion to an account of my present position and progress, I will
endeavour to give you a short description thereof. First as to
my position. It is at this moment in the coffee-room of the
Birkenhead Hotel on the Cheshire side of the River Mersey,
and about 1J miles from Liverpool, having a beautiful view of
the river, shipping, and town of Liverpool. Then as to my
progress. I will commence with leaving Sheffield on Wednesday
and carry you through to the present moment.
" On Wednesday afternoon I left Sheffield per ' Pilot ' and
called at Sandal, near Wakefield, to see Mr. Dyson (one of the
principal resident engineers on the North Midland Railway),
armed with testimonials from Mr. Leather, and was very
politely received by him, but he thought I had not sufficient
experience in masonry to be qualified for the situation I sought,
but he should see Mr. Swanwick and Mr. Gooch the following
day and would see if he could be of any assistance to me. I
then went forward to Leeds by the 'Telegraph,' and in the
morning waited on Mr. George Leather, to whom I stated my
object and Mr. Dyson's opinion of my competence, on which
he desired his son (Mr. J. W. L.) to write to Mr. Dyson and
say that I had seen a good deal and would, he had no doubt, be
able to fulfil the situation creditably. I then returned to
Wakefield, but was obliged to wait till night before Mr. Dyson
22 EAELY LIFE
and Mr. Swanwick returned to dinner, when I presented
Mr. Leather's letter to Mr. Dyson, who however still thought
he could scarcely safely recommend me (on the score of in-
experience), but would mention me to Swanwick and Gooch
and do everything in his power to forward my interests. Thus,
then, as far as the North Midland and Leeds and Manchester
were concerned, I had done all in my power and must wait the
issue. On the following day, therefore (Friday), I went up to
Beeston Park to see George Leather, and spent most of the
day very pleasantly."
The next two days, we are glad to find, he made
holidays, and spent in rusticating with some of the
Leather family at Ilkley, "celebrated for its pure air,
romantic scenery, and cold baths," but on Sunday he
was off again to Manchester, with a letter of intro-
duction to Mr. Locke from Mr. George Leather.
" At Manchester I went to see Mr. Thomas Brittain, and in
the afternoon we had a long ramble in the environs and town,
and at night he kindly offered me a bed, which I, with my
wonted good nature in such cases, accepted, and on Monday
morning, having furnished myself with a map of the town, I
thoroughly examined the public works, particularly the Bolton
Eailway, now in process of execution. In the afternoon
Mr. Brittain obtained me the sight of a spinning and weaving
factory, where we saw the whole progress from the raw wool to
finished calico, and in perfection too, being the largest of the
kind in Manchester, which I assure you is saying no little.
"At five o'clock I left Manchester for Liverpool, much
gratified by Mr. and Mrs. Brittain's kind hospitality. The first
26| miles on the railway we traversed in sixty minutes, inclu-
sive of five minutes' stoppage, being at the rate of 29 miles in
an hour."
At Liverpool, finding that Mr. Locke was absent,
he determined to await his return, and in the mean-
MR. RASTRICK 23
time went off to amuse himself by an inspection of
the docks, "a rich treat." The letter ends with
" kindest love to mother, yourself, and the innumerable
family at large."
No record is extant of his interview with Mr. Locke,
but we next hear of him writing from Tapton, near
Chesterfield (the home, it may be noticed in passing,
of George Stephenson), where he had secured lodgings
in the house of a Mr. Dean, an old-fashioned farm
"with monstrously low rooms and stone floors; the
bedroom is pretty well, but has a confounded plaster
floor." What it was that took him to Chesterfield
at this date is not stated, but he had now definitely
entered the employment of Mr. J. U. Eastrick, and
in the beginning of 1838 we find him writing to his
father to say that he is duly installed into his new
situation and his new lodgings in the Crescent,
Birmingham.
" Of course," he adds, " I can't say yet how I shall like the
situation, or whether the situation will suit me, but I hope all
will be right. I was very much pleased to meet in the office
with a Mr. Turner, whom you will recollect in breeches and
leggings surveying on the Sheffield and Manchester Railway.
We have an office to ourselves, and he is a first-rate designing
draftsman, highly educated, well informed, and very agree-
able, so that I am of course quite pleased with the accidental
meeting."
John Urpeth Eastrick, young Fowler's new employer,
was one of the leading engineers of the day. He was
born in 1780 and died in 1856. He is frequently
spoken of in the railway literature of the period as
Mr. Eastrick of Stourbridge, where he was partner in
the great iron foundry of Bradley, Foster, Eastrick,
24 EARLY LIFE
and Co. As early as 1814 he had taken out a patent
for an engine, but, like most of the older engineers,
he was at first incredulous as to the merits of the
locomotive engine. In the great parliamentary struggle
for the Liverpool and Manchester Kail way in 1825,
he was employed by the promoters, and was the first
witness called in support of the railway. Mr. Eastrick
on this occasion spoke favourably of Stephenson' s loco-
motives then employed on the Killingworth and Hetton
railroads. The Bill on this its first introduction was,
as all the world knows, withdrawn. In the next and,
as it proved, successful application, the precise nature
of the means of traction to be used was left an open
question. Strange as it may appear, when the Bill for
this pioneer line of railway was passed, it was not
yet determined whether the trains were to be drawn
by a locomotive or by a stationary engine. The con-
struction of the railway went on, and Mr. Walker of
Limehouse and Mr. Kastrick of Stourbridge — two
engineers of the highest reputation — were instructed
by the directors to visit the Darlington and Newcastle
Kail ways, and to examine carefully both plans — the
fixed and the locomotive — and to report the result.
Messrs. Walker and Kastrick reported in favour of the
fixed engine, and "in order to carry the system re-
commended by them into effect, they proposed to
divide the railroad between Liverpool and Manchester
into nineteen stages of about a mile and a half each,
with twenty-one engines fixed at the different points
to work the trains forward." It is matter of history
how Kobert Stephenson and Joseph Locke, under the
direction of George Stephenson, successfully combated
the views of Messrs. Walker and Kastrick, and how
BIBMINGHAM 25
the directors in their dilemma offered a prize of £500
for the best locomotive engine ; how this reward was
voted by the judges, of whom Mr. Eastrick of Stour-
bridge was one, to Stephenson's famous "Eocket," and
how the triumph of the locomotive was thus finally
won.
All this happened some few brief years before young
Fowler entered on his apprenticeship. His chiefs, both
Mr. Leather and Mr. Eastrick, had in that short period
been swept into the full current of the enterprise that
had been set flowing by the genius of their old
opponent, George Stephenson.
Mr. Eastrick continued to be employed in many of
Stephenson's enterprises, and in all probability Fowler's
introduction and visit to Mr. Locke led to his being
passed on to Mr. Eastrick, then working in close co-
operation with Stephenson.
Fuller details of his work are given in a letter to
his father, written from No. 1, Crescent, Birmingham,
on February 22nd, 1838 :—
"I have now been more than a fortnight in Birmingham,
but we have been so busily engaged that the time has appeared
much shorter. However, I think I have seen sufficient to
be able to say that everything is proceeding satisfactorily and
will prove much to my advantage.
" I told you, I believe, in the short, hurried note you would
receive when my uncle returned to Sheffield, that we were
preparing working drawings of the works on the Manchester
and Birmingham Eailway, and London and Brighton. Since
that time we have lost the Manchester and Birmingham by
a stock-jobbing trick, at which the Manchester speculative
swindlers are such adepts. On Saturday last we were making
great exertions to complete some designs that Mr. Kastrick
was to take with him to Manchester on Monday morning
26 EARLY LIFE
for a meeting of directors. On his arrival there he was told
that they (the directors) had given notice for an alteration
of the line of railway from beginning to end. Now Mr.
Rastrick had never heard one word of their intentions,
although he had come from London a few days before with
the very person who had been there to make arrangements.
Not one word was said to him on the subject. He was
naturally very indignant, and told them (the directors) that
as they had chosen to take such a step without consulting
him he should have nothing more to do with the concern,
and from that moment their connection must cease. This,
as you may naturally conceive, rather astonished us, for
Mr. Rastrick in his usual blunt way told us on his return,
' Well, it's no use drawing any more bridges on the Manchester
and Birmingham ; we must now attend to the London and
Brighton.' What will be the upshot of it all I can't tell,
but I shall not be at all surprised if we have to oppose the
application for their new intended line.
"We are therefore attending to the London and Brighton
Railway, that is, drawing working plans of the bridges, etc.,
required on the line."
His stay in Birmingham was not, however, to be
long. On March 3rd, i.e. in less than a month from
his arrival, Mr. Rastrick sent him to London, and he
writes on that date to his father, saying that he has
enjoyed an inside seat in the " Emerald " Coach.
" Although my residence will be changed from Birmingham
to London, I am not aware that that circumstance will make
any material alteration to me personally with respect to my
engagement with Mr. Rastrick, but it may be of advantage
in other points of view ; and as it is very probable I shall stay
there during my engagement at least, I shall have an oppor-
tunity of seeing London, and maybe obtain a wrinkle from
southern acuteness. As far as personal comfort is concerned
I am afraid the change will be for the worse; I don't think
LONDON 27
I shall get such comfortable lodgings as Mrs. Farrow's, nor
shall I have such very commodious offices, and of course
I don't know a single individual in town, but as personal
comfort is not any part of the principle of Civil Engineering
these things are of no importance/'
His friend Mr. Turner, he is glad to say, is going
with him, and they hope to continue together their
occupation of designing the bridges for the London
and Brighton Railway.
The following letter gives an account of our young
engineer's first journey to London, at that time con-
siderably behind the North in respect of railway
development : —
" CRAVEN HOTEL, CRAVEN STREET, CHARING CROSS,
"Monday, 6 p.m. (March 5th, 1838.)
" DEAR FATHER, — I arrived at last in that wonderful centre
of everything that is great, good, bad, and indifferent, that
receptacle of the most accomplished swindlers and the most
enterprising men of business, London, after a most tedious and
protracted voyage of eighteen hours, the roads so positively bad
that, although we had six horses nearly the whole of the
journey, the passengers were obliged to dismount and the coach
dragged at a foot's pace for almost a mile at a time, and at no
very distant intervals ; however, here I am at last, and I must
beg leave to say that since my arrival I have made pretty good
use of my time. I have seen St. Paul's, Westminster Bridge,
Blackfriars and new London Bridges, Post Office, etc., etc.,
been swindled by a cabman, called on 493 different houses for
lodgings, and at last engaged a most beautiful sitting-room and
bedroom in a very excellent situation, Warwick Court, Holborn.
The house is occupied by a respectable architect and builder,
Mr. Smith, who appears quite a literary character, and has
a good library, a free use of which he kindly offered me.
I have engaged the rooms for a week certain, at a moderate,
a very moderate rent, considering the situation and style,
28 EAELY LIFE
for the sitting-room is positively elegantly furnished. I intend
to keep my own tea and coffee, etc., but not to dine at home,
but at a chop and eating house, where to-day for Is. 2d. I had
one of the best dinners I ever ate.
" I have no time to say much in this letter, for the post will
soon be closed ; however, I must not forget the most im-
portant subject which I have to mention, and unless for it
I should not have written so early as to-night. The fact
is, I have only about 15s. left, and I don't like to ask Kastrick
so very soon to advance on account; it looks rather too
snobbish. However, I hope you will have received some
portion of the money due to me from Mr. Burbeary. I must
beg positively of you to send a £10 Bank of England note en-
closed on Tuesday and directed to me at care of J. U. Kastrick,
Esq., C.E., 454, Charing Cross. I must again beg you will not
neglect, because if a man can't meet his liabilities he becomes
a bankrupt. ... I think I am settled here for the next five
months at least, which is just what I wanted, but I was rather
disappointed to-day when I tried Eastrick to increase my
salary. He told me he had had so many persons applying
for employment on the Brighton Line (the crack of all other
lines) that he had been offered to be served for nothing. But
I don't care much ; salary is not my object now, and what I
have will pay my expenses pretty well, with economy.
" I have a great deal to say to you and my mother, and if
I stay here you may expect, on the payment of IQd. postage, to
receive some descriptive accounts of London and its wonders.
" Give my kindest love to my mother, and tell her that I
thought of her when I first set eyes on St. Paul's Cathedral."
In a long letter written to his grandfather he gives
the following account of the nature of his work in Mr.
Kastrick's office in Birmingham and then in London :—
" I must now, in as short and succinct a manner as possible,
tell you how I spent my time, which I assure you was anything
but in idleness. In the morning at nine o'clock the office
OFFICE HOUKS 29
opened, at half-past two we dined, returned at half-past three,
and remained until seven. These were our office hours, and
as to my employment in the office I am afraid you will not
understand that part of the business quite so clearly ; however,
to give you an idea, Mr. Eastrick (the gentleman with whom
I am at present engaged) is the principal engineer for a line
of railway from London to Brighton which is now in progress
of being executed, and, as you will imagine, a great deal of
work has to be done in making bridges over and under roads,
over rivers and canals, etc., and as these works have all to be
let by contract, and consequently very particular working
drawings made of all the works required, you may conceive
that a great deal of preparation is necessary before this can be
done, and the work commenced. Now my part or employment
was to make designs for bridges, calculations, etc., which is,
of course, very important, as immense sums of money might
be thrown away without due care and consideration.
"Mr. Eastrick, finding it very inconvenient to be at such
a great distance from the line of railway on which we were
engaged (the London and Brighton), very properly decided
to remove us nearer to our work, especially such of us as
were engaged in matters requiring constant reference and
communication with surveyors, etc., employed taking surveys
and levels along the line. This was the reason I was removed
to London. ... I occupy two rooms, the sitting-room, which
is on the ground floor, is a very well furnished room, with
couch, looking-glass, stuffed arm chair, paintings, etc., and the
lodging-room is a comfortable room, though near the top of
the house. I pay a certain sum per week for the rooms, and
then have to find my own coals, candles, tea, coffee, sugar, milk,
wood for lighting, washing, butter, bread, etc.
"Our office hours in London are from half-past nine to
half-past five, with the intervention of a dinner-hour, which
leaves us a tolerably long evening to our own disposal; and
consequently, after leaving the office I go to a coffee-house,
and for Is. or Is. 2d. I get as good a dinner as I could possibly
have, and see the daily papers into the bargain, after which I
30 EARLY LIFE
generally look a little about some part of London and then return
home, where I amuse myself with either studying, reading,
or writing, according as I may feel myself disposed at the
time, and on the whole am as comfortable as can be expected
considering I have no society and have to pay 4s. $d. per ounce
for coals.
" I have not yet seen much of London, excepting the bridges
over the Thames, St. Paul's Cathedral, Westminster Abbey,
Regent's Park, Day and Martin's blacking manufactory, and
a splendid gin palace; the two last places, notwithstanding
their odd titles, are decidedly more magnificent places than
the new post office in Sheffield."
On May llth, 1838, he writes from 45, Stamford
Street, Blackfriars, to his father with regard to some
local road-making plans on which our young engineer
appears to have been consulted. The letter is curious
as illustrating the warm and personal way in which
he espoused his client's cause, and also as recording
the first occasion on which he appeared as witness
before a Parliamentary Committee.
In the course of the letter he comments very freely
on what he considered the shady tactics of the opposi-
tion, and on some mismanagement on the part of his
friends. He approached Mr. Kastrick with some
trepidation, "he is such a queer fellow," and asked
leave to attend the committee. Rather to his surprise,
for the office was very busy, Mr. Rastrick told him
"to take and go," "and accordingly I did take and
go." Under date June 18th, 1838, he thus describes
his first appearance in the witness-box :—
" I had a long cross-examination to-day, and succeeded much
better than I anticipated, for I was not the least nervous or
confused, and consequently passed very respectably, I think,
MAIDENHEAD BRIDGE 31
but I must say I think our counsel (Mr. Talbot) did not make
the most of his case.
"Baines was against us, but he was rather lenient with
me than otherwise, and did nothing more than his duty to
his clients.
"I have now made my maiden bow, and know the worst
of this much-dreaded cross-examination, but I have been
obliged to give up a journey to Manchester respecting the
Oldham Waterworks, which is now in the House, and is in
an awkward situation from the surveyor making a complete
failure in the Commons and losing the cause there. Mr. G.
Leather, of Leeds, is the engineer employed, and begged per-
mission of Mr. Eastrick for me to go down and repair this
blundering, but this road affair compelled me to stop in town."
It is evident that young Mr. Fowler's chiefs were
beginning to recognise his latent capacity.
In the same letter, viz. May llth, 1838, Fowler gives
an interesting account of a visit paid to Maidenhead
Bridge, Brunei's beautiful construction, about which
grave misgivings were then rife : —
" On Sunday morning last, at eight o'clock precisely, I threw
myself on the outside of an Oxford coach to go to Maidenhead
to see a brick bridge built there over the Thames, on the
Great Western Eailway. The day was beautiful, and I very
much enjoyed the journey. Maidenhead is 26 miles from
London. . . . The bridge I went so far to see is of a novel
construction, being built of brickwork set in cement for two
elliptical arches of 128 feet span each, and is now, I arn
sorry to say, in a dangerous situation. The centering has
been slackened, and the arches have followed it for 5 inches
at the crown, and now rest on them, but not as you would
suppose at the crown of the arch, but at about 15 feet on
each side, while the crown is 2J inches clear of the centering.
This settling has made the outline of the arch perfectly Gothic
and totally destroyed its symmetry, but the worst of the
32 EAELY LIFE
matter is that the arch which has been turned in half-brick
rings has separated at every other joint, and consequently
the arch is further there weakened by the lower part of it
leaving the upper part. The outside of the arch shows eight
half-brick courses, but the inside has thirteen. The spandril
wall of one arch has cracked from top to bottom, so likewise
have all the walls for backing up the inside of the arch, both
occasioned, of course, by the settling. The foundations are on
rock, and therefore very unyielding. The centering is a very
excellent and a very scientific one, the whole of the timbers
being in a state of thrust."
" What will or can be done is too much for me to say."
The incident here narrated is thus noticed by Mr.
Brunei's son and biographer.
" The great bridge over the Thames at Maidenhead contains
two of the flattest and probably the largest arches that have
ever been constructed in brickwork. . . . The main arches are
semi-elliptical, each of 128 feet span and 24 feet 3 inches
rise. . . . The radius of curvature at the crown of the large
arches is 165 feet, and the horizontal thrust on the brickwork
at that point is about 10 tons per square foot. . . . The
Maidenhead Bridge is remarkable, not only for the boldness
and ingenuity of its design, but also for the gracefulness of
its appearance. If Mr. Brunei had erected this bridge at a
later period, he would probably have employed timber or iron ;
but it cannot be a matter of regret that this part of the
Thames, although subjected to the dreaded invasion of a
railway, has been crossed by a structure which enhances the
beauty of the scenery."
With regard to the defective condition in which
young Mr. Fowler found the bridge, Mr. Isambard
Brunei gives the following information : —
" During the construction of the bridge a part of the crown
of the eastern arch proved defective in consequence of the
MAIDENHEAD BRIDGE 33
cement in the middle of the brickwork not having set suffi-
ciently at the time when the centering was eased. Apprehen-
sions which had been entertained by some as to the safety of
the structure were groundless, for when the defective part was
taken out and replaced no further trouble was experienced. The
bridge has stood well, and has shown none of those symptoms
which an overstrained structure exhibits."
Mr. Fowler's connection with Brunei's beautiful
bridge was destined to be renewed again many years
later. In 1893, addressing tbe Merchant Venturer's
School at Bristol, he gave the following account of
the widening of the bridge. He cites it as an instance
of the improvement in the manufacture of materials,
other than steel and iron, used in bridges and similar
structures : —
" This bridge," he said, " consisting of two main arches, each
128 feet span with a rise of 23 feet 3 inches, was built in 1837
with bricks known as ' London Stocks ' and with mortar made
partly with chalk-lime, and partly but chiefly with Eornan
cement and sand.
" With such materials the bridge had very little margin of
stability ; indeed, with the east arch considerable difficulty was
experienced in putting it into a perfectly safe condition.
"When the widening of the Great Western Eailway from
London to Didcot was decided upon, the mode of dealing
with the Maidenhead Bridge necessarily required special con-
sideration.
"Very naturally, as the consulting engineer of the com-
pany since the death of Mr. Brunei, the directors referred the
matter to me for my decision, and I had no difficulty in
advising the Board to make the addition on each side, and
preserve the old beautiful lines and elevation.
"The work is now finished, and is satisfactory to the
directors and Mr. Brunei's old friends.
"The bricks used in the widening were of very superior
D
34 EARLY LIFE
quality, and possessed a strength of resistance against crushing
several times greater than the bricks originally used in the
work, although no doubt Mr. Brunei adopted the best material
at that time obtainable.
" The mortar used for the widening (Portland cement and
clean Thames sand) possessed a degree of cohesive strength
and a regularity of quality, which were unknown in the days
of lime and Eoman cement.
" With such superior materials it is not surprising that the
additional arching was a work of perfect simplicity, and free
from the anxiety which the original work under other con-
ditions caused the engineer.
"When we consider the amazingly improved methods of
manufacture of the three common but most important
materials employed upon structures for land, and with ships
for water, viz. steel, bricks, and cement, we are unable to
form any definite idea of the total amount of benefit —
economical and otherwise — that has resulted from these im-
proved methods."
It is an interesting episode, though as introduced
here it somewhat anticipates our narrative. It supplies
a comment on the pessimism which, from an artistic
point of view, is ever bewailing the deterioration of
modern methods of manufacture and workmanship.
The artistic proprieties perhaps are and have been less
considered than they should be, but the superiority of
every class of material at the present time gives the
engineer and the architect a larger scope for the accom-
plishment of his design. There always is and must be
a question of economy in the background, for the desire
to economise effort is a condition of our existence, but
it is very questionable if it has more weight as against
artistic considerations with the present generation than
with generations which have gone before.
CHAPTEK II.
SUBORDINATE EMPLOYMENTS
HIS engagement with Mr. Eastrick was now drawing
to a close, and he had to consider the next step.
In pursuance of the plan of allowing Mr. Fowler as
far as possible to tell his own story, the following letter
to his father is inserted.
" 45, STAMFORD STREET,
" BLACKFRIARS ROAD, LONDON,
"JulylSth, 1838.
"MY DEAR FATHER, — My engagement with Mr. Rastrick
being now within a few weeks of its termination, I thought it
best to have his wishes with respect to its continuance, and
to-day I have had a conversation with him on the subject, the
result of which I am anxious to communicate to you, and
receive your answer per return, if possible, as I have promised
to give a final reply this week.
" By way of introduction, I must beg of you not to mention
to any one the salary I have had or am to have, for I detest
the country fashion most heartily of interfering with every
person's affairs and business.
"Mr. Rastrick's offer (which I feel disposed to accept) is
£160 a year for the next twelve months, or £80 for six months
and the chance of a resident engineer, should he be enabled
to give me one, and in case of being from home 10s. Qd. a day
for * wittels.'
" Now although this is not a very high salary, yet I think
35
36 SUBOEDINATE EMPLOYMENTS
on the whole it will be better to accept it at the present, until
something better turns up, for the following reasons :—
" Baines will not then be able to badger me and express his
indignation to the House of Lords at the heinous crime of my
being twenty-one years of age.
" If I should be disposed to try my luck in Yorkshire the
people will almost have forgotten me in that time, and conse-
quently I shall be much better thought of.
" And, lastly, it is possible I may meet with something here
worth having in the meantime.
"Now I am rather disposed to think that Mr. Eastrick
would give me rather more than £160 a year before he would
allow me to leave, but I would much prefer concluding a
bargain with him, with an obligation on his part to give me
a better situation if he has the opportunity, than drive the
bargain to the utmost sixpence, because I believe Kastrick will
do me a service if he can; however, do let me have your
opinions on these points.
" I saw my uncle in town last week for a very short time,
but I shall be very sorry if he ever comes up without my
seeing him ; and on my mentioning to him what would probably
be the result of my trying again to agree with Eastrick he
fully concurred with me in opinion as to the policy of
continuing, and you are aware that I entertain a very high
opinion of his judgment in mundane affairs.
" I enclose my small account for the Halifax and Sheffield
Eoad Trustees, which I will trouble you to deliver for me with
my best compliments to Mr. Burbeary."
Then in his character of elder brother he requests
his brother Henry to send him specimens of his work,
and with an eye no doubt to his own information as
well as Henry's education he offers to pay for as many
designs of bridges "as he can afford to do for a
sovereign."
A month later, August 14th, 1838, we find a further
HIS YOUNGER BROTHERS 37
letter to his father on the subject of Henry's education,
and it is amusing to notice how completely this young
man of twenty-one has taken in charge the whole of
his family. Henry is about to engage with his own
old instructor, Mr. Leather.
" I hope," he says to his father, " you will not procrastinate
again for the very moderate period of twelve months before
taking the final step, for it is quite possible Mr. Leather may
have the offer of a large premium for so desirable a situation."
He feels unable to advise about Charles, who was
desirous of becoming an architect. He recommends
London in preference to Sheffield, and prays the family
not to be bigoted in favour of Flockton, a local architect
of Sheffield.
The letters ramble on in a good-natured way, con-
fident, yet always respectful and affectionate, and
occasionally jocose.
" The possibility you mentioned in your last of yourself and
mother coming to London was so extremely ludicrous that
I laughed for twenty minutes consecutively. My mother in
London, ha ! ha ! But I hope she will go with you to the north,
and if you should come to town, I should of course be most
glad to see you. . . .
'<! want now to say a few words to you about treating me to
a theodolite, a very beautiful instrument which I can purchase
cheap, £16 ; for with the expense of London and occasionally
purchasing a few books and instruments I am as poor as a New
Poor Law cat."
The future Conservative candidate was apparently
even at this time a Tory in politics, but there are very
few political allusions in his letters of this date. In
this letter he expresses a fear that "our radical
38 SUBORDINATE EMPLOYMENTS
ministers will take some step, perhaps open the ports
to lower the price of corn in a short time, for people
are becoming very clamorous at the rise of bread."
Then at the end of a three-page, closely written
letter the important information is added, " I have
agreed with Mr. Eastrick again on his own terms."
As to his future, he continues to speculate. He
would like, when leaving Mr. Eastrick, to have em-
ployment on the Manchester and Sheffield, perhaps as
a contractor, or perhaps Lord Wharncliffe would give
him the post of a resident engineer. His uncle at this
time purchased Chapel Town Iron Works, and was
looking out for a moneyed partner.
" I tell you candidly/' he says in a letter to his father, " that
if I could by any means obtain the use of £3,000, I would
negotiate with him to join as an active partner, and reside upon
the works, for although my professional prospects are perhaps
as bright as most young men of my age, yet I am not so con-
fident about the future, and if I had a chance of entering
in the Chapel Town concern I assure you I would embrace
it, but if you don't know any Mr. George Greaves, or some
such person who has a few thousand he is anxious to employ,
I am afraid I shall have to give it up."
By this time he had moved to 25, Frederick Place,
Hampstead Eoad, but in November he was sent by
Mr. Eastrick to Cumberland, and he writes to his
father from Preston, November 5th, 1838 : —
"As I have half an hour to spare before the coach starts
for Lancaster, I avail myself of the opportunity of writing a
few lines to explain the object of my being here.
" I start from Lancaster to find the best line of railway
through Cumberland near to the sea coast as far as the Calder
SURVEYING IN CUMBEELAND 39
Eiver (a distance of 40 miles), where I shall be met by a
gentleman whom Mr. Eastrick has sent to start from Mary-
port.
" This railway will form part of a continuous communication
from London through Birmingham, Preston, Lancaster, Mary-
port, Carlisle, and thence to Glasgow, of which that portion
from London to Preston is now open and from Preston to
Lancaster is in a forward state of execution.
" The peculiar feature in the railway in which I am engaged
here is the embanking of Morecambe Bay from the sea, by
carrying the railway over the estuary of Morecambe and re-
claiming about 50,000 acres of land from the sea.
"As I expect to have nearly fifty miles of levels to take,
I fully anticipate being in Cumberland for a month or six
weeks at the least, especially as the weather appears likely
to prove unfavourable.
" I am accompanied by a gentleman (Mr. Bristow) who has
only been a pupil of Mr. Eastrick for a very short time, and
whom Mr. Eastrick has placed under my judicious care in a
professional view, but he is a very clever, gentlemanly fellow,
about nineteen years of age, and a first-rate mathematician,
and besides a very pleasant companion.
"The remainder of the line will be under the superin-
tendence of two gentlemen who have frequently taken levels
for Mr. Eastrick. and knowing his ways and having two levels
instead of my one, will have an advantage so far as point of
rapidity."
Then follows a request that his old staff holder,
Marsh, should be sent to him.
In his next letter, dated November 12th, 1838, he
gives a further account of his undertaking.
" You wish to know a little more of the scheme on which I
am engaged, but as I am said by an eminent phrenologist to be
deficient in the bump of description, I am afraid I can't be very
clear and explicit.
40 SUBORDINATE EMPLOYMENTS
"You are probably aware that a good deal of interest has
been excited by the discussions, surveys, etc., which have taken
place to prove whether the best line of railway to Scotland
should be taken on the western or eastern coast. Now it is
of great importance to the existing railways in the direction
of the north from London that theirs should be made use of
as part of the grand Northern Trunk, and it is with reference
to the scheme of continuing the railway communication from
Lancaster across Morecambe Bay and along the western coast
to Carlisle and thence to Glasgow and Edinburgh that we
are now employed. The portion of the scheme which is now
being surveyed by Mr. Rastrick is from Lancaster to Mary-
port, and this distance is divided into two portions: in one
from Lancaster to the Calder River beyond Ravenglass, I have
the honour of being entrusted with the exploring of the
country and finding and levelling the line, and thence to
Maryport is completed by two gentlemen who have before
levelled a good deal for Mr. Rastrick.
"The principal feature in this scheme, as I think I told
you before, is the formation of a railway across the bay of
Morecambe, and thereby reclaiming about 40,000 acres of
land from the sea. The bay I have crossed to-day with a
chain at low water, and then the sands are quite dry for
miles in extent and most beautifully level, and indeed at
the point of crossing them with the railway embankment
(10J miles in length) the sands are only covered to a small
extent at low water.
"I have been detained at Lancaster considerably longer
than I expected, partly from the unfavourable state of the
weather, and partly from having taken a line quite distinct
to the one which has been thought of, and therefore having
to level twice as much as was expected; however, I have
this morning sent off an immense despatch to Mr. Rastrick
with the result of our operations, which I hope will be
satisfactory. . . . The whole of the Cumberland hills are
covered with snow."
MORECAMBE BAY 41
A fortnight later he writes again :—
"MY DEAR FATHER, — I must apologise for not complying
with your wishes as to a letter per week, but really I have
been too much engaged until this afternoon, when a tre-
mendous gale of wind has given me a little leisure.
"My survey is now almost completed, and if the weather
should be favourable I shall be in town again in a week.
"After finishing on the Lancaster side of Morecambe Bay,
I had a difficult country to encounter in the peninsula of
Furness, and my progress with respect to distance was slow ;
but I determined thoroughly to examine and find out the
best possible line in a general point of view without entering
unnecessarily into detail, and, I think, succeeded tolerably
well. And at the northern extremity of the peninsula I had
to level across the estuary of the Duddon, which at low
water is confined to a channel of 150 yards in breadth, but
at high water is nearly two miles. Now although levelling
across sands is generally a very simple operation, yet in this
case it was not so particularly simple.
"In the first place the sands are almost what might be
called quicksands, and in the next place low water was before
daylight and we were two hours after the ebb, and in the
last place I had an attack of slight English cholera or some
other confounded affection.
"However, we managed pretty well over (being ferried
across the channel in a boat) to the opposite shores, but the
tide was then rolling in apace, and we had nearly a mile
to run to get to the boat (now pray don't be alarmed, I beg,
for I assure you I am not going to be drowned). However,
off we started at a rattling pace; the first low place which
had been covered by the tide was not more than a foot deep,
and easily passed ; then, tally ho ! on for the next, which we
knew was the deepest, and if we couldn't pass it return was
impossible ; however, the first got over in about 18 inches
of water, the next, who was at his heels, about 2 feet, the
next deeper; I was the next with my level on my shoulder,
and got clear of a tremendous wave, which, however, caught
42 SUBORDINATE EMPLOYMENTS
Marsh, who was at iny heels, and nearly overset him. And
thus all got clear with merely a desperate cold bath, then
off and away over the dry, intervening high sand to the boat
in the principal channel, which by this time had become more
than half a mile broad ; and being landed on the opposite
shore we made the best of our way to quarters and changed,
and fortunately I took no increased cold.
" After sending off despatches of this work to Mr. Eastrick,
I passed over into Cumberland, and, the country being favour-
able, I have progressed at a rapid rate until to-day, when the
wind has been too high for levelling.
" Yesterday, after attending divine service at Bootle Church,
I and Bristow ascended one of the mountains (Black Combe),
2,000 feet high, and the day being very clear we had a most
magnificent prospect, the inland Cumberland mountains
(Helvellyn, Scawfell, Skiddaw, etc.) being snow-capped in a
most splendid manner, and besides other objects we saw the
Isle of Man and Scotland very distinctly.
" I wrote yesterday to Mr. Eastrick for some more ammuni-
tion, as we find we shall be obliged to remain in the country
if not taken out of pawn. Our expenses have been enormous,
being obliged to post very long distances round Morecambe
Bay, Duddon, etc., but we have been very careful as far as
possible. However, £50 in a month — or rather a little more
than three weeks — looks almost as bad as valuators travelling
with four horses on the Manchester Eailway, seeing double hills,
and estimating the wrong ones at a distance that required
very powerful optical instruments even to distinguish.
"As the supporters of the West Cumberland and Furness
Eailway are very sanguine, it appears probable that they may
'deposit' in March; and if so, after assisting Mr. Eastrick
in making his calculations and report, I may perhaps be down
here again in a month to take the parliamentary levels."
His next letter is from Ravenglass, Cumberland,
under date December 4th, 1838 :—
"I have nothing particular to relate except my having
LETTERS FROM CUMBERLAND 43
been most completely soaked through and through every day
since last Sunday but once, and getting amongst the water
on the tide rivers with which the shore here abounds; but
I am now quite accustomed to it.
"We have been so much delayed beyond the time at first
contemplated for our getting finished, that I have been
devising schemes for working all weathers in future, if
possible, for Cumberland wind and rain set all calculation
at defiance.
"I had a long interview yesterday with Sir Fleming
Senhouse, who takes the principal management in this
scheme, and lunched with him. I was not aware before that
I was Mr. Fowler, the engineer ; but so Sir Fleming said,
and I allowed it to pass."
Mr. Fowler at this period of his life looked con-
siderably more than his real age. The crime of being
only one - and - twenty was not very patent, and in
after years Mr. Fowler used to say that the fact was
to his advantage.
Then for his father's information there follow some
remarks on the state of agriculture, the nature of the
fences, which here consisted of soil embankments of
about 5 feet high, 4 feet wide at the top, crowned
by a low hedge, and with ditches on both sides "in
size more like young canals."
Three days later, December 7th, 1838, he is on
his way back to London, and writes to his father
from Preston : —
"I expect, if the West Cumberland and Furness Railway
scheme should go on, we shall be very busily engaged from
the present time to March 1st (the last day of depositing
plans for Parliament), but I have been so long from head-
quarters that I am rather ignorant of the arrangements
which have been made on the subject; but I will take an
44 SUBORDINATE EMPLOYMENTS
early opportunity to write you a full account, but I quite
expect I shall not have the pleasure of eating iny Christmas
pie at Wadsley Hall."
On the 19th December he writes again to his father
that his survey has been approved by Mr. Kastrick,
who was then considering his report.
"My survey was very satisfactory, and all the deviations
I took from the general principle of the line Mr. Eastrick
marked out upon the ground (I don't mean questions of
detail) he has adopted without exception, and if the scheme
proceeds I expect to go down again immediately and remain
till March. I don't think I shall be able to get down to
see you this Christmas, but I don't exactly know, as there
will necessarily be a calm for a week or two during the time
Mr. Eastrick 's report is being printed, a meeting called, and
the question of further progress decided on before the
hurricane commences, after which casting anchor is out of
the question, for, once embarked, we must ride out the gale.
If I do come, I shall dine with you on Sunday next, but
don't expect me until you see me."
Whether Mr. Fowler spent Christmas with his father
or not we are unable to say, but he returned again
before long to his surveying in Cumberland. The
following letter, written in 1883, relates an incident
in connection therewith :—
"I remember," he says, "the incident in crossing More-
cambe Bay sands perfectly well; indeed, it was a danger not
likely to be forgotten.
" Mr. Bischoff and I, and Mr. Jonathan Binns, of Lancaster,
were driving across the sands when I was acting as Mr.
Eastrick's chief engineering assistant in laying out the railway
from Lancaster across the sands thence near to Barrow (now
very famous for iron works, shipbuilding docks, etc.), through
AN ADVENTUEE 45
Furness, across Duddon sands, Eavenglass, Whitehaven, and
Workington.
" The railway was called, I believe, the Morecambe Bay
Eailway, and the plans were deposited in 1838 and 1839.
Mr. Bischoff, Binns, and myself were posting across the sands
when a sudden and violent snowstorm came on.
"I recollect that, although the windows were closed, the
fine snow, driven by a strong wind, penetrated into the
carriage and formed a small snowdrift inside. In those days
the route across the sands, and especially the tidal channels,
which had to be crossed, was marked by boughs of trees put
into the sand as guides to travellers, and men were engaged
to watch any changes in the channels, and then alter the
position of the boughs. To show that this was necessary,
it was narrated that a coach got into a channel not many
years before, and all were drowned.
"After passing some distance across the sands on our
journey, we became aware that our horses were no longer
trotting, but were walking slowly ; and on opening the window
and speaking to the driver, I found he was crying, and
admitted he had lost his way.
"As the youngest of the party, I got upon the box, took
the reins, and endeavoured to get an idea of our course. I
had to take a leap in the dark, and changed the course con-
siderably, but as it turned out not sufficiently, for a man soon
after galloped up to us and inquired where we were going.
Of course we answered that was exactly what we wanted
to know.
" The man was a carrier, and had detected the spot where
our driver had gone wrong, and where I had partially made
the mistake. He soon brought us to shore.
" It appeared that the driver had turned his course, so that
he was driving out to sea, and I had corrected it so that we
were driving parallel to the shore. In one hour we should
all have been drowned except for the carrier.
"Binns is dead long ago, but Bischoff lived to resuscitate
the Tilbury Eailway which I made many years ago, and I
46 SUBORDINATE EMPLOYMENTS
lived to make the Metropolitan and Metropolitan District
Railways, and a good many other things.
"The Morecambe Bay Railway was an important and
thoroughly sound conception, but it was proposed before its
time ... I was very proud to have been entrusted, at twenty-
two years of age, by Mr. Rastrick with the sole responsibility
of laying out so great and difficult a work ! "
The West Cumberland and Furness Railway, or
the Morecambe Bay Railway, as Sir John Fowler
calls it, apparently came to nothing, but in June,
1839, Mr. Rastrick sent his competent young assistant
to Burton-on-Trent to take the levels of a line of
railway, a continuation of the Manchester and Derby,
to join the Birmingham and Derby at Willington,
some five or six miles from Burton, but, as he wrote
to his father : —
"It is merely an opposition scheme to the Manchester
Extension Railway now before Parliament, and not a bond
fide undertaking."
On June 29th, 1839, he writes to his father :—
' I shall most certainly leave Rastrick in August, when my
engagement expires, but shall not decide exactly what to do
until I come down into Yorkshire, which I have considered will
be best in several respects, although probably I shall immedi-
ately open offices in Sheffield as ' Civil Engineer and Surveyor,'
but I have several reasons for wishing it not to be spoken
about at present. Your assistance, which would be indispen-
sable, I take of course for granted from your usual kindness,
would not be wanting.
" Before I leave London I purpose getting a few instruments
and books of reference, which I can do much better and
cheaper on the spot than if I have to send for them, and for
which I should want your assistance, and my time being now
rather limited, I wish you would write as soon as possible.
PLANS FOE THE FUTUKE 47
" The amount about as under : —
£ s.
5 in. Theodolite . . . 26 5
Pocket sextant . ..55
Pentagraph . . ..99
Protractor . . ..22
Books, including Smeaton's reports,
Tredgold's works, etc. that I have
marked down in a catalogue . . 18 6
£61 7
" Even if I should not open offices in Sheffield, the above
list will be necessary in almost any situation I should be in. . .
" We are much engaged in Parliament just now in opposing
the Manchester and Birmingham Extension Eailway Bill, and
from the present state of the promoters and opposers it appears
likely to be one of the most expensive applications and opposi-
tions ever made, not less I should say than £200,000, which
would make a snug little railway of itself."
A letter of August 3rd, 1839, gratefully acknow-
ledges the receipt of £70 sent to him for the modest
equipment above mentioned.
"My time," the letter goes on, "with Kastrick* is now very
short, as I shall leave him next Thursday, and, the day after,
I propose going down to Potter (James Potter, Esq., Civil
Engineer, Borden's Farm, Balcombe, Sussex), and after re-
maining with him a week or ten days, return to London, and
then after settling my important worldly affairs, you may
expect me down in Yorkshire. The astronomical calculations
of the time of appearance of this extraordinary comet give
August 24th as the time when he may be expected to be seen
in this hemisphere."
* In a letter to the Times, September 26, 1891, Sir John Fowler drew
attention to the omission of Mr. Rastrick's name from an article com-
memorating the jubilee of the London, Brighton, and South Coast
Railway. He seems throughout life to have cherished a kindly recollec-
tion of his old employer.
48 SUBOEDINATE EMPLOYMENTS
Eight days later his plans had again changed, as we
learn from a letter of August llth, written from Leeds :
"On Wednesday last I received a letter from Mr. J. T.
Leather, stating that his uncle was in want of someone to be
on a railway of his in Durham, and wishing me either to come
or write immediately on the subject.
" I consequently left London on Thursday night, as I con-
ceived writing would be a very imperfect mode of obtaining
proper and correct information of the nature of the situation,
salary, etc., and it appeared it was necessary to be decided
in the shortest possible time.
"On my arrival in Leeds, and calling on Mr. Leather, I
found the situation he wished me to take as follows : —
" To be at Seaton, in Durham, on the railway, and his office
at Leeds alternately, and the salary he could give £200 a year.
" Now as this is something different to what you expected me
to do, and, in fact, what I intended to do myself, I will detail
to you the circumstances which influenced me in deciding on
the step I have taken, which is to accept the appointment.
" Mr. Leather's office is a most excellent one (from the
varied and miscellaneous work presented) for improvement,
and some of a character with which in a great measure I am
unacquainted, and the railway in Durham has sea embanking
and other peculiar works which make it desirable, and I am
desirous of getting yet more information on works. And
generally there are several things which will be better obtained
in his office than anywhere else, before I commence business on
my own account ; and in future I am convinced the only way
for a man to be successful is to understand all the scientific
and practical part of engineering well.
"I have not decided on this step either from indecision of
character or in haste, but from a well-considered balance of
advantages and disadvantages.
" I certainly only propose to remain a year with Mr. Leather,
and intend to open offices in Sheffield on the 1st September,
1840, but this is not what I should like Mr. Leather to know,
as he might not perhaps be pleased."
STOCKTON AND HARTLEPOOL 49
In the autumn of this year we find him settled
down in permanent quarters at Mr. Stonehouse's farm,
Greatham, near Stockton, Durham.
" Mr. Stonehouse," he writes, " is a farmer of 400 acres of
land, and I have exceedingly nice rooms, and they appear a
very good sort of people ; but of course it was rather a favour
to get here as they are not in the habit of taking lodgers.
However, that was done through the kind offices of one of the
directors.
" I find myself very fully occupied, which must be a sort of
permanent excuse if I write a short letter, or if I don't write
at all, for just at this moment I have made an engagement
with the contractor to be at one end of the work (five miles
from here) at seven in the morning, to measure up for his
monthly payment, and at twelve I have to meet some of the
directors, the solicitor, and the agent of the Dean and Chapter
of Durham about the alteration of some roads; afterwards I
have to put some levels in for a part of the work."
Mr. Fowler, during the years 1839 and 1840, re-
mained in superintendence of the making of the
Stockton and Hartlepool Eailway, spending his time
between Greatham and Hartlepool, with occasional
absence at Leeds, the head office of his employer,
Mr. Leather.
The following letter to his principal, a draft of
which has been preserved, illustrates the sort of work
which had to be performed by a resident engineer.
"GKEATHAM, July 30th, 1840.
"We have had a considerable influx of bricklayers during
this week, and most of them are first-rate hands from Leeds,
so that now we have men for the outside work competent to
make the most of the rather middling bricks we are obliged to
use — middling I mean for appearance, because with respect
to hardness and soundness they are very good indeed.
E
50 SUBORDINATE EMPLOYMENTS
" I enclose you a sketch of the present state of the viaduct,
from which you will be able to judge of our progress.
"We have about 100 bricklayers at work at the viaduct at
present, which is as many as can be employed with the present
centreing, but I expect to-morrow night the Greatham Beck
culvert will be completely finished and the centreing, and thirty
men will then be removed to the viaduct.
" We have now only ten piers remaining to be piled, and as
there are nine engines to drive them I expect to have them
finished next week, and when the foundations are well prepared
we shall be able to provide materials for the bricklayers with
less difficulty.
" On the whole I consider the viaduct to be now proceeding
in a very satisfactory manner, because as many men are em-
ployed upon it as can possibly work with advantage.
" The bricks, lime, gravel, sand, timber, and other materials
required for the work demand the greatest care and attention,
in order that nothing may be wanting to keep every workman
constantly supplied, and this I find sometimes so pressing that
I have several times been under the necessity of causing
Greatham cutting to be stopped a shift, to employ the men and
horses in providing what was most urgent.
"I am now able to furnish you with an account of the
expense of covering the viaduct with coal-tar.
" To cover 46 square yards :
s. d.
Coal-tar . . . 10 0
Coal . . . 10
Time . ..36 Pounded clay, 46 yards, 1
inch thick. 11 J cubic yards
14 4 at Is. 6d, 17s. 3d.
or 3f d. per square yard. or 4Jd per square yard.
But as it would be desirable to cover the tar with 4 or 6 inches
of soil, it is probable the expense would be about equal.
" The coal-tar done makes a very complete work by being
carried up the spandril walls, and in a heavy shower the water
immediately runs to the opening of the pier in the lowest point
THE RAILWAY OPENED 51
and flows out scarcely discoloured, and the degree of elasticity
obtained will effectually prevent its cracking.
" The covering of the spandril walls makes a much better
junction to the arches than could be done if they were covered
with clay instead of tar, and it certainly has this advantage
over clay, that the brickwork is thereby kept perfectly dry,
whereas clay would keep it moist and wet.
" As an instance of the preservative quality of boiled coal-
tar, I may mention that a few weeks ago, in repairing the
bridge at Sunderland (which I suppose is nearly 100 years old),
a piece of Memel plank was taken up which had been covered
with it, and was found perfectly sound and hard but quite
black, and the tar itself unchanged.
" I have been fortunate enough to meet with a very clever
man to manage the boiling and preparing the tar, and I am
sure if you saw the five arches now finished with it and the
spandril walls covered, you would be pleased.
" Every other part of the line is going on favourably except
the laying of the permanent way, for which we have not yet
sufficient men ; but I have caused advertisements to be issued,
which, I have no doubt, will procure them in a few days."
The Stockton and Hartlepool Eailway was opened
early in 1841. Mr. Fowler, who, as we have already
seen, was wont to identify himself with his work in
a strongly personal way, seems to have been a little
hurt at the absence of his family from the opening
ceremony. In a letter, dated March 15th, 1841, and
written from Greatham, after dilating on this grievance,
he goes on to describe his own connection with the
railway.
" The dinner passed over, and the next morning found me
early at the Stockton station with a slightly feverish brow and
a great many arrangements to make for the traffic and trains,
and at eight o'clock I mounted the engine for the first trip
to Hartlepool, and kept to my post (on the engine) all day,
52 SUBOKDINATE EMPLOYMENTS
all the traffic arrangements and conducting of the trains and
orders at the stations appearing to devolve on me. I was
up a good deal of the night again, and next day was on
the engine all day again. This day in performing the last
trip we had an accident with the engine by blowing out
the lead plug near Hartlepool, which kept us up till between
two and three in the morning to repair and get the engine
back to Stockton. Since that time I have been nearly as
much engaged, but we have had no accident whatever, except-
ing killing a horse belonging to Hutchinson, the contractor.
The accident was to the last train from Hartlepool to Stockton
(being dark at the time), and one of Hutchinson's lads was
leading bran down the Clarence Railway. On the arrival
of the lad at a certain part of the line, he was cautioned not to
proceed further until the train had passed, as the Clarence has
only a single line at that place in consequence of replacing
some old materials; but the fellow said he would go into
a siding immediately below and wait till the train had passed.
And had he done so all would have been well, but he passed
on, and met the train full. The engine driver saw him a short
time before they met, and slackened speed as much as possible,
but the concussion was sufficient to throw the engine off the
rails, kill the horse, scatter the bran, etc.
" I was not on the engine at the time, but attending a parish
meeting about a mile distant respecting the railway, and they
immediately sent for me. I collected a force of men with
screw-jacks and crowbars and winches, and we got her on the
line at half-past twelve, and with the other engine dragged her
to Stockton."
A large and varied responsibility was thus thrown
on the young man of three-and- twenty, and the next
letter shows that his capacity and services were obtain-
ing recognition. On August 12th, 1841, he writes to
his father from Stockton-on-Tees :—
" I have had Mr. Leather over here to the general meeting,
and during his stay several of the directors of the Stockton
GENEEAL MANAGEK 53
and Hartlepool Bailway took an opportunity of speaking to
him about my continuing with them. He replied very
handsomely that he had no objection if they wished it, and
he advised my continuing to manage the traffic of the railway
until Hutchinson was done with his contract, and, of course,
when my engagement with Mr. Leather might expire, and then
they might make an agreement for my continuing with them.
Mr. Leather said he thought I should not be content to remain
for less than £300 a year ; and they said although well aware
they could obtain persons who might perhaps be able to
manage for them for less salary, they would have no objection
to give that. And there for the present the matter rests.
I have fitted up, or am fitting up, an office in the station, and
am looking out for lodgings in Stockton."
Towards the close of the letter he adds that he
is going to Newcastle about some new engines ;
apparently he was now entirely responsible for the
management, traffic, and locomotive department of
the new line, of which lie had himself been the con-
structing engineer. Such, a concentration of authority
in one person was rare even in those early days, and
in after life Sir John Fowler was wont to refer to his
connection with the Stockton and Hartlepool Kailway
as a very valuable experience. Throughout life John
Fowler seems to have revelled in hard work, and
whether his day's occupation was a difficult problem
in engineering or, as here, the routine of a responsible
but still commonplace task, his was one of those
fortunate natures which require neither recreation nor
refreshment apart from work.
Herein no doubt lay one of the secrets of his success
and happiness.
There are men who work hard at trying to amuse
themselves, and meet with only moderate success. The
54 SUBOEDINATE EMPLOYMENTS
most enviable life is that which is fully occupied in
some congenial and engrossing pursuit. Fortunately
many men find their happiness in what is superficially
regarded as the drudgery of daily life, and for many
years this was Fowler's attitude towards his profession.
There are those who complain of the too narrow
scope of the industrial life, but the lesson taught by a
candid consideration of the facts seems to be, that it is
quite possible, by a reasoned submission to the inevitable,
to find, both in work successfully accomplished and in the
leisure earned thereby, some measure of artistic satisfac-
tion. The career of a successful engineer like Sir John
Fowler is to some extent exceptional, but it is still a fair
illustration of a wise philosophy of industrial life. A
long career of useful and unremitting toil, from which
he derived a never -failing enjoyment, brought him
ample means and leisure to indulge his love of hos-
pitality and society, sport, travel, and art. The
biographer has been struck, in turning over the
materials confided to him for the purpose of this work,
by noticing how much wider the circle of interests
seems to grow in middle and later life, and further,
how on the whole, at every period of it, his life seems
to have been a happy one ; so much so is this the case
that, though undoubtedly each addition to wealth and
reputation was duly appreciated, the impression is
firmly created that even had his ambition been
narrower, and his success less marked, Fowler would
still have been a happy man. Youth is generally
supposed to be the period of wide aspiration. The
doors of the prison-house of life tend to close, the
poet tells us, on the growing man. This process was,
we believe, reversed in the case of John Fowler.
PAELIAMENTAEY BUSINESS 55
The habit of getting immersed in business was not
unnoted by Fowler himself. He does not reprobate
it or excuse it, but notes it as inevitable in the fol-
lowing comment on the failure of Mr. J. T. Leather
and his brother Henry to visit him according to
promise.
"It is," he says, "a most extraordinary circumstance, how
people in business acquire the habit of never going to any
place unless there is some advantage in it, and I therefore
shall never speculate on seeing him, unless his profession calls
him here."
Though they were all too busy for mere visits of
ceremony or pleasure, the young man was very ready
to take much trouble in order to assist his brothers and
to advise his father as to their professional prospects.
Early next year, i.e. in March, 1843, he was in
London on parliamentary business connected with the
Hartlepool extensions.
"We are encountering a very fierce opposition on every
point, and if we succeed at all it will be by fighting inch by
inch."
On May 22nd, 1843, he writes : —
" I am here, as you are aware, much longer than I expected,
but the business about which I came is concluded to-day, so
far as regards the House of Commons. In due time it will
be introduced into the House of Lords, when a similar fight
will again have to be encountered.
"In the last week, however, I have been more or less en-
gaged in some other matters, and to-day I have been engaged
in the different committee-rooms in three different questions.
The Hartlepool Junction Eailway, against (now finished); the
Monkland and Kirkintilloch Kailway, for (postponed for a
week) ; the Ballochney Railway, for (which I have to attend
to-morrow)/'
56 SUBORDINATE EMPLOYMENTS
This practice is, he remarks, " satisfactory and
profitable," and he wishes he had more of it. A
cross-examination in a committee-room has now no
terrors for him.
In September he is back again at his post on the
Stockton and Hartlepool Bailway.
"I think it very likely some change will take place here
soon, which will affect me, from the traffic falling so very
short of their expectations, and it will probably end in its
being leased (as in truth it ought to be) to the Clarence Rail-
way, with which it communicates, and of which it ought, when
first projected, to have been a branch.
"We are preparing plans for applying to Parliament next
year for a dock at Hartlepool, and, from the continued illness
of our secretary, and having all his duties and money matters
to attend to in addition to everything else, I am at present
closely confined, or I would come over to Wadsley some day
soon, and ask Henry to meet me.
" I have been very anxious about Henry for some time,
from knowing his position, where really he is learning nothing,
and from a letter I have lately received from him."
On January 19th, 1844, he writes to his father :—
"We expect very severe opposition to our new docks at
Hartlepool, and an immense mass of engineering evidence is
expected to be given. I shall at least gain information of great
value in the contest, whatever may be the fate of the Bill.
Sir Gregory Lewin is retained for us, and he has been with me
two days upon the work, getting to understand the engineering
and nautical points of the case. I have engineers or con-
tractors with me almost every day, who are expected to give
evidence for us, and this takes up much of my time; and
every moment I can spare from them I devote to a chart of
the coast I have prepared, with soundings, surveys of rocks,
eddies, etc., etc., and also the preparing of a model of our
present mode of shipping coals at Hartlepool, so that you may
HIS FIEST ENGAGEMENTS 57
conceive I am pretty fully occupied. I expect to be in London
in about three weeks. . . .
" I believe this session will be a very busy 'one in Parliament
with railway Bills. I have not got anything except the dock,
although I believe I shall be engaged in some other matters.
I have been spoken to about a railway in Cornwall by a party
who wishes to have my assistance in Parliament."
The Stockton and Hartlepool Eailway was a short
line of some eight miles. It was subsequently worked
in close connection with the Clarence Kailway, and the
whole combined length amounted to 43 miles. In
1852 the whole was amalgamated with the Hartlepool
Docks, then in course of construction, and the title
of the undertaking became the West Hartlepool
Harbour and Kailway Co. Two years later, by the
Act of July 31st, 1854, the company was amalgamated
in the system of the North Eastern Eailway, in the
balance-sheet of which there still figure certain West
Hartlepool Primary charges representing the un-
redeemed portion of the shares of the old Clarence
Kailway Co.
The Ballochney Kailway, to which allusion is made
above, was a mineral railway in direct communication
with the Slamannan and the Monkland and Kirkin-
tilloch lines, and through the latter with the Garnkirk
and Glasgow, and also with the Wishaw and Coltness
Railways. It was authorised by an Act of Parliament
in 1826. Up to 1840 we are told by Whishaw in
his Railways of Great Britain and Ireland, published
in 1840, this line had been worked chiefly by horses,
but at that date it was being prepared for locomo-
tive traction. It also contained a self-acting run of
1,200 yards on some modification of the "switchback,"
58 SUBOBDINATE EMPLOYMENTS
altogether a very primitive work. The whole of these
lines is now incorporated in the North British system.
Mr. Fowler's inspection of these railways was under-
taken through the invitation of Sir John MacNeill, the
well-known Scoto-Hibernian engineer.
The Stockton and Hartlepool Railway was an under-
taking of comparatively small importance, but it gave
Mr. Fowler a bit of experience which is probably
unique in the annals of railway engineering. He
seems to have surveyed and then built the line, and
then to have combined in his own person the responsi-
bility for every branch of railway management, from
buying the engines to shutting the carriage doors.
In the course of this employment he picked up a great
deal of miscellaneous information bearing on his pro-
fession which is not readily acquired under the minute
subdivision of labour which even then was becoming
usual.
CHAPTER III.
THE RAILWAY ENGINEER
1844-1850
IN the early part of 1844 young Mr. Fowler came to
London, and his independent work as an engineer
may be dated from that year. In a " List of various
works upon which Sir John Fowler has been engaged,"
kindly furnished from his office, there are three entries
only for 1844. Great Grimsby Railway, Sheffield and
Lincolnshire Railway, Opposition to Sheffield and
Lincolnshire Railway.
In 1845 the list is longer and more imposing: The
Great Grimsby Railway, Opposition to Great Grimsby
Railway, Sheffield and Lincolnshire Railway, Opposition
to Sheffield and Lincolnshire Railway, East Lincolnshire
Railway, Great Grimsby and Potteries Railway, Wake-
field, Pontefract, and Goole Railway, Sheffield, Barnsley,
and Wakefield Railway, Humber Survey, Great Grimsby
Works, Wakefield, Brigg, and Goole Railway, Sheffield
and Lincolnshire Extension, Great Grimsby Extension,
Nos. 1, 2, and 3.
The list for 1846 contains thirty-six entries, and
that for 1847 thirty-eight; so that it may be said that
at once the young engineer stepped into a large and
lucrative practice. Apart from his chief employment
in connection with the Lincolnshire railways and docks,
59
60 THE EAILWAY ENGINEER
there are entries of consultations and work done with
regard to railway stations at Sheffield, railway and
harbour work at Cockermouth and Workington, water-
works at Sheffield, and a line of direct railway from
London to Exeter, and a number of small railways in
the neighbourhood of Glasgow ; and in the following
years it may, without exaggeration, be said that his
practice had extended into every part of the kingdom.
In 1851 we find an entry for work done in connec-
tion with the Eheims and Douai Railway, and in the
same year began his connection with the Oxford,
Worcester, and Wolverhampton Railway, now an im-
portant section of the Great Western system. This
]ast work had been begun by Brunei, but was at this
date transferred to the charge of Mr. Fowler, who
carried it to completion.
It would be tedious to narrate in detail the manifold
employments in which Mr. Fowler now became engaged.
Some of the larger undertakings with which he was
associated will be described later on. His task at this
date was not only the construction of works, but also
the conduct through Parliament of the legislative
measures necessary to their inception, amalgamation,
and extension. The railway mania, then about to
begin, made most urgent demands on the time and
services of every capable engineer in the kingdom, and
naturally the cool-headed, competent young Yorkshire-
man was in great request. In after years, discussing
his career with a son of his great predecessor and
friend, Brunei, Mr. Fowler dwelt on the comparatively
prosaic character of much of the engineering work of
this period. The era of railway romance came to an
end with Stephenson, and Mr. Fowler on the occasion
PARLIAMENTAKY COMMITTEES 61
mentioned, with a certain paradoxical exaggeration,
described the work of railway construction at this time
as pinning down tapes over a large scale map and then
cutting them up with a pair of scissors into convenient
lengths for construction.
A new departure, in his own career at all events, he
always maintained was begun when in 1853 he became
associated with the first scheme for tunnelling a railway
under the streets of London, an enterprise to which we
propose to devote a special chapter. We feel justified,
therefore, in passing somewhat lightly over the work
of this period and dwelling rather on the general
conditions under which the engineer's calling was then
conducted.
Much of his work, as already said, was done in the
committee-rooms of the Houses of Parliament. Of his
views of the duty of an engineer in this respect the
best account to be given is that contained in his pre-
sidential address to the Institution of Civil Engineers,
delivered in 1866.
"All classes of the profession, but especially the railway,
the dock and harbour, and the water-works engineer, must
possess a knowledge of parliamentary proceeding, so as to be
able to avoid all non-compliance with the Standing Orders of
Parliament. To do this, it is true, is no easy matter, as the
clauses are often drawn up with so little care and practical
knowledge that neither engineers nor solicitors, nor the most
experienced parliamentary agents can understand what is
intended.
" On the subject of parliamentary proceedings generally, it
may be taken for granted that all committees desire to do
justice to the cases which are brought before them, and that if
they sometimes fail in their decisions, either as regards the
interests of the public or in arranging a fair settlement between
62 THE KAILWAY ENGINEER
antagonistic interests, it is not unfrequently due to the im-
perfect and crude manner in which the cases are presented to
them. I would therefore impress on all young engineers the
importance, both to themselves and to their clients, of laying
their cases before committees in the most perfect manner
possible, accompanied by full and correct information, carefully
prepared and clearly worked out."
The work of an engineer lias necessarily to be carried
on with the assistance of a public which is in large
measure deficient in technical knowledge. Not only
parliamentary tribunals, the counsel who practise
there, but also directors, shareholders, and the public
who may become shareholders, have to be instructed
and conciliated. A large measure of Fowler's success
was due to his proper appreciation of this fact. He
was an admirable witness, and a most persuasive
advocate. As we have already seen, he espoused with
warmth any cause which he advocated, and naturally
identified himself with his clients, and even as a boy he
was keenly alive to the mischief done to a cause by
the slovenly presentation of it by counsel and wit-
nesses. Many jibes have been made at the expense
of the "expert witness," but they are due largely to
a misconception of his position. An expert witness,
as we all know, is examined on oath, but at the same
time his position is very generally recognised as, in
some respects and within certain limits, that of an
advocate for the side which retains his services.
There are limits in advocacy beyond which an
honourable man, whether on oath or not, will refuse
to go. A railway company, demanding from Parlia-
ment compulsory powers, supports its cause by
advancing estimates and hypotheses of a highly
THE EXPEET WITNESS 63
technical character. It is necessary, owing to the
uncertainty which must attend any calculation of this
character, that each link in it should be closely
scrutinised. Both petitioners and opposers are justified
in having the technicalities of their case presented
by competent witnesses. There is, naturally enough,
a disposition on the part of counsel and litigants to
press such witnesses to pass beyond the letter of their
brief and to affect a judicial attitude which they
ought not to be asked to assume. In discussing with
the author the ethical aspects of the question, one of
the most distinguished of living engineers admitted
the somewhat anomalous conditions, and the embarrass-
ment in which the zeal of counsel on his own side
occasionally placed him. As evidence of the versatility
of the expert witness, a well-known parliamentary
solicitor described to the author his visit to an accom-
plished engineer for the purpose of securing his
assistance for some application to a parliamentary
committee. The answer was one of regret that the
request had not come earlier, as he had already
committed himself to give evidence for the opposition.
This readiness to take the responsibility for arranging
the technical arguments relevant to the acceptance or
rejection of any particular engineering work requiring
compulsory powers from Parliament does not neces-
sarily imply any trifling with truth. The legal
technicalities of a case are set out by a barrister
who is not on oath, while the engineering technicalities,
often much more abstruse than the other, are set out
by expert witnesses on oath. Among those chiefly
concerned the situation is well understood, and, jesting
apart, there is not in the mind of reasonable men any
64 THE EAILWAY ENGINEEK
suspicion of the integrity of an honourable profession
which is obliged to conduct an important section of
its business under these peculiar conditions.
The railway mania of 1844-5 found John Fowler
fully equipped for the work of railway construction.
It carried him forward almost without effort to fortune
and reputation ; and when, as was inevitable, the reac-
tion came and the high waters of speculative enterprise
began to ebb, his abilities retained for him the com-
manding position which he had already gained in his
profession. Some general account of an episode so
important to Mr. Fowler's career will not be out of
place.
The excitement of the time has been often described.
Up to 1844 the railway industry had been pursued
with moderation and caution. It provided a great
public convenience and a remunerative investment for
the savings of all classes. Some of the early companies
were declaring good dividends, and there seemed every
prospect of continued prosperity. Mr. Francis, in his
entertaining History of the English Railway, published
in 1851, writes as follows : —
" The traffic of the country had trebled within the previous
twenty-one years. Three railways, the London and Birming-
ham, the Grand Junction, and the York and North Midland,
paid ten per cent, while a fourth, the Stockton and Darlington,
divided fifteen per cent. The safety of the locomotive had
also been proved. In 1843, seventy railroads had conveyed
25,000,000 passengers for 330,000,000 miles with only three
fatal accidents, and that, too, at an average cost of Ifd each
person."
The success of the railway as an investment, added
to its obvious convenience, and the benefit occasioned
THE KAILWAY MANIA 65
by the demand for labour, seemed to justify from
every point of view the zeal of the new adventurers.
"It was calculated that were 2,000 miles of the projected
roads completed, 500,000 labourers would be employed for
four years; that the poor rates must necessarily diminish;
that the consumption of excisable liquors would increase, and
that the revenue of the country must improve."
The press, the pamphlet, and the pulpit vied in
eulogising the new invention. Fine writing, says Mr.
Francis, was at a premium, and he proceeds to give a
few choice specimens.
"Kail ways," said one dithyrambic journal, "are the emblems
of internal confidence and prosperity. They are the prophetic
announcement of an open-eyed people that will not waste
their dearest action in the tented field, but exhibit it in the
mightier fields of commerce."
The political economist was appealed to by another :—
" Do the people want present employ ? Eailways give it to
hundreds of thousands at this moment. Is it desirable that
the artisan or mere labourer should at all times be able to
transfer his skill or his strength to the place where he can
most profitably employ either? Eailways give the power to
do so. Is it desirable that prices should be equalised generally
through the country ? Eailways are the great levellers, bring-
ing the producer and consumer into immediate contact. . . .
By railways the whole country," piously added the writer,
"will, under the blessing of Divine Providence, be cultivated
as a garden."
There is more truth perhaps in these sanguine pre-
dictions than Mr. Francis, writing in the depressed
period of 1851, is prepared to admit; but there is no
66 THE EAILWAY ENGINEER
doubt that, for the moment, expectation as to the
immediate commercial success of railways was much
exaggerated.
The literature of the prospectus, says Mr. Francis,
is worthy of note. One route ' ' would disclose a
succession of picturesque scenes," another " traversed
a country of unrivalled beauty." The direct London
and Exeter, an undertaking in respect of which
Mr. Fowler seems to have been consulted, was pro-
posed partly because " it was nearly the road adopted
by the Komans."
While the mania lasted, the increase of railway pro-
posals was extraordinary. In a compilation supplied
to the Times by Mr. Spackman in November, 1845,
the national liability in respect of railway extension
is set out.* Forty-seven companies had completed their
works and had absorbed some 70J millions of money, of
which 22^ millions were raised by loan. There were
118 lines and branches in course of execution, and, of
the 67 millions required for their construction, only
6j millions had been paid up. There were 1,263 rail-
ways projected. In respect of these 59 millions had
to be deposited as a preliminary to their consideration
by Parliament. The total capital paid up, together
with the deposits required on new projects, was
£113,612,018. The liabilities in the way of loans and
expenditure incurred or to be incurred in the con-
struction was £590,447,490. How all this money was
to be found no one knew.
There were not wanting warnings that speculation
was going too fast. The Bankers Magazine ridiculed
the suggestion put forward by some enthusiast that
* See EVANS'S Commercial Crisis of 1847-8, p. 22.
THE REACTION 67
" we are to have railway streets in London, with carriages over-
head, and the foot passengers and shopkeepers underneath ;
while in the country, railway steam-engines on the atmospheric
plan are not only to perform all the work of the lines, but are
to employ their surplus power in impregnating the earth with
carbonic acid and other gases, so that vegetation may be forced
forward despite all the present vicissitudes of the weather, and
corn may be made to grow at railway speed."
Other influential persons and journals, notably the
Times, tried to stem the torrent. Mr. Glyn, the
banker, chairman of the London and Birmingham Kail-
way (now the London and North Western), pointed
out that railway property by reason of this wild
speculation was in great danger. Mr. Hudson, the
Railway King, warned the public against an un-
necessary and over-hasty multiplication of lines. Mr.
Saunders, chairman of the Great Western Eailway,
spoke in similar terms ; but remonstrance was in vain.
The " boom," to use a modern term, continued during
the spring and summer of 1845, till on October 16th,
1845, as a first sign of the impending reaction, the
Bank of England raised the rate of interest.
Before the end of the month a panic, ultimately
commensurate with the previous speculation, had begun.
Prices reached their lowest point some three years after,
namely in October, 1848. Although in many instances
not a sod had been cut, and notwithstanding the heavy
liability attached to them, the shares of most of these
railways were at a premium. When confidence was
shaken there ensued a wild anxiety to "get out."
Many subscribers had applied for more stock than they
could pay for, partly because they saw that allotments
in full were not made in the early stages of the mania,
68
THE KAILWAY ENGINEER
and partly because premium-hunting had been hitherto
a remunerative pastime. Now, the difficulty was to
find the allottees of the shares and to extract from
them the balance of liability on their allotments. "On
one projected line," says Mr. Francis, "only £60 out
£700,000 was realised by a call. No other panic,"
says this well-informed authority, "was ever so fatal
to the middle class." The following statement of
prices will show as clearly as anything else the de-
structive effect of the panic.
AUGUST, 1845.
OCTOBER, 1848.
Amount of share.
Amount
Highest
Amount Highest
paid up.
price.
paid up. price.
£
£
&
£ £
Brighton .
50
50
... 80£
50
29
Caledonian
50
5
... 12|
50
20f
Eastern Counties
25
14/16/0
... 2H
20
13|
Great Western .
100
80
... 236
90
80
L. and N. Western
stock
—
... 254
stock
121
Midland .
stock
—
... 183
stock
86
South Eastern .
. av. 33/2/4 ...
—
... 48J
av. 33/2/4 .
24£
South Western .
. av. 41/6/10 ...
—
... 84
stock
42
York and N. Midland 50
50
... 112
stock
54
The Board of Trade on November 28th, 1844, had
announced that, in virtue of the authority conferred
on it by the legislature, it would require evidence on
certain points from promoters before reporting to Par-
liament in favour of their proposals. On December
31st a report was issued by the Board which, if its
policy had been adopted, would have restricted compe-
tition within what the Board conceived to be legitimate
limits. Parliament however set this advice on one side,
and adopted the principle that a railway had no vested
interest, and was not entitled to be protected from
competition.
Mr. Morrison urged in Parliament the necessity of
THE BOAKD OF TRADE 69
regulating the new industry, but the result is thus
summed up in a passage quoted by Mr. Francis.
" Swayed by motives which it is difficult to fathom, the
two Houses, with singular unanimity, agreed to reverse their
wise decisions (i.e. the recommendations of the Board of Trade),
and to give unrestricted scope to competition. Little regard
was paid to the claims and interests of existing railway
companies, still less to the interests of the unfortunate persons
who were induced to embark in the new projects for no better
reason than that they had been sanctioned by Parliament.
The opportunity of confining the exceptional gauge within its
original territory was also for ever thrown away. By an
inconceivable want of statesmanlike views and foresight, no
effort was made to connect the isolated railways which then
existed into one great and combined system, in the form in
which they would be most subservient to the wants of the
community, and to the great ends of domestic government
and national defence. Further, the sudden change from one
extreme of determined rejection or dilatory acquiescence to
the opposite extreme of unlimited concession gave a powerful
stimulus to the spirit of speculation, and turned nearly the
whole nation into gamblers."
Such was one line of argument, and from it we may
formulate the following statement of grievances :—
1. That Parliament had not protected railway share-
holders or endeavoured to secure existing railway com-
panies from competition.
2. That it had not enforced one gauge for the whole
railway system.
3. That it had allowed railways to be isolated, where-
by the interests of " domestic government and national
defence " had been neglected.
4. That by giving unrestricted scope to competition
it had stimulated speculation.
70 THE KAILWAY ENGINEER
The indictment is an interesting one, if only because
it shows how difficulties of this character often succeed
in solving themselves. No body of railway contro-
versialists now ask to have special legislation in favour
of shareholders. The gauge question, after experiment,
has solved itself without legislative interference. There
is, as far as we are aware, no demand for military
railway lines in this country. A large proportion of
railway property is held by trustees and persons who
select it because it is not a speculative investment.'
Even the margin of ordinary stock is not speculative
in the popular sense of the term. The neglect of
Parliament, as conceived by the above-quoted com-
plainants, does not appear, therefore, to have had very
serious consequences.
There was of course another side to the shield. If
the party which desired a stricter regulation of railway
enterprise was disappointed, the railway interest itself
had grounds of complaint. Mr. Robert Stephenson, in
his presidential address to the Institution of Civil
Engineers in 1856, gave expression to this feeling.
He pointed out the illogical position of a legislature
which assumed that, owing to the facilities for combi-
nation, competition was impossible between railways,
and yet went on authorising duplication of lines to
the ruin of shareholders, and, insomuch as the new
competition was invariably terminated after a period
by fresh combination, without any advantage to the
public. By this policy, as he puts it, the capital of
railway enterprise is constantly being increased, while
the traffic is being divided.
Robert Stephenson's often quoted aphorism, which he
on this occasion imputes to the legislature, that " where
THE REGULATION OF RAILWAYS 71
combination is possible competition is impossible," may
suggest to some minds the corollary that a railway
company can and does charge exorbitant rates. This
was not Stephenson's own view, as the following, which
he himself with great deliberation has inserted in this
same presidential address, will show.
" It may be thought," he says, " that with respect to fares,
the interests of railway companies and of the public are
antagonistic. Regarding the question, however, with a more
enlarged view, it will be readily seen that so far from those
interests being opposed, they are, in all respects, identical.
Fares should be regulated by directorates, exclusively by a
consideration of the circumstances which produce the largest
revenue to the companies, and the circumstances which produce
the largest revenue are those which induce most travellers to
avail themselves of railway facilities. As regards the public,
it may easily be shown that nothing is so desirable for their
interests as to take advantage of all the opportunities afforded
by railways. As regards railways, it is certain that nothing
is so profitable, because nothing is so cheaply transported, as
passenger traffic.* Goods traffic of whatsoever description
* Adam Smith (Wealth of Nations, book i. chap, viii.), living before
the age of railways, said that " a man is, of all sorts of luggage, the most
difficult to be transported." Nothing marks the extent of the economic
revolution produced by railways more clearly than the complete contra-
diction that may now be given to Adam Smith's proposition. Railway
communication permits men (and the permission is now being brought to
the reach of the manual labourer) to live in one place and do their daily
work in another, and to move from place to place where the " best stock
or employment is to be found." It has thus gone far to release the
labouring class from the immobility which at one time tied them to
unremunerative » toil upon the land of the parish where they were
settled, thereby adding enormously to the efficiency of labour. It is
hardly too much to say that, under this newly acquired mobility, the
units of labour are acquiring something of the character of interchange-
able parts of machinery, a principle of the most far-reaching importance.
When it is added that the motive power, in the circulation of labour, is the
attraction of better remuneration or improved conditions of toil, and the
72 THE KAILWAY ENGINEER
must be more or less costly. Every article conveyed by
railways requires handling and conveyance beyond the limit
of the railway-station ; but passengers take care of themselves,
and find their own way at their own cost from the terminus
at which they are set down."
This passage sets out very correctly the grounds on
which confidence is claimed for the principle of freedom
of enterprise. The term competition as ordinarily
understood is a very inadequate description of the
guarantee for public convenience which we believe
is contained in that policy. The influence which has
prevented railways from being an oppressive monopoly
has not been merely the competition of other modes
of transport, (though this competition has not been
wanting), nor the regulation of authority, but the
much more effective competition of the natural
tendency of men and things to remain where they are.
Immobility is cheap and simple, and is far the most
formidable competitor with which railway companies
have to contend, and it can only be overcome by
increasing the cheapness, facility, and comfort of
transport.
To return, however, to the mania of 1845.
The incipient signs of panic in the early autumn
of 1845 did not interfere with the deposit of plans
which, according to the regulations of the Board of
Trade, had to be made on or before the 30th November
of that year.
result, as regards commodities, greater efficiency and cheapness of pro-
duction, we have gone near to formulating the very essential principle
of modern civilisation — high remuneration for labour and the rapid
multiplication and increased cheapness of commodities. We are able
herein to see how important a part has been played by that most valuable
implement of commerce, our modern railway system.
THE EAILWAY MANIA 73
"The 30th November, 1845, the day by which the docu-
ments were to be lodged, fell on a Sunday, but there was no
Sabbath for the restless railway promoter. ' The stir of agents,'
says the Railway Chronicle, ' made Sunday anything but a day
of rest or devout observance throughout the country. The
offices of clerks of the peace and the doors of the Board of
Trade were stormed by breathless depositors till the stroke
of midnight. Frantic " standing- order missionaries" from
Harwich, arriving a few minutes afterwards — miscarried,
alas ! by blundering postboys, who drive for an hour and a
half about Pimlico seeking the office in vain — have to besiege
its inexorable doors and fling their plans into the lobby,
breaking the passage lamp, with no effect but that of having
them flung back again in their doleful faces. ... On the Great
Western Eailway the haste to overtake spare minutes had
nearly led to a tragedy dark enough to fill the courts of Gray's
Inn and the purlieus of Chancery Lane with inconsolable
mourning. A squadron of solicitors to some of the projected
lines had borrowed the wings of an express, which unhappily
broke down at Maidenhead. In this disabled condition the
engine was charged by another, which had started with several
legal gentlemen connected with the Great Western and Exeter
Companies, and the carriage with the learned freight was
dashed to pieces. . . . The scared pursuivants shook them-
selves, packed up their ruffled plans, charitably picked up the
stranded attorneys, whose wreck had nearly caused a dismal
hiatus in the profession, and heroically steamed onwards,
arriving, we are glad to hear, in good time. ... A collision
between engines on the broad gauge we take to be as smart
an encounter as any tilting encounter. ... On the Great
Western Eailway on Sunday there were ten express trains
similarly employed'; and reading this, we deem it a great
mercy that we have no worse casualty than the above record." *
The plans had to be deposited not only at the
Board of Trade, but at the offices of the Clerk of the
* FRANCIS, History of English Railways, vol. ii. p. 248.
74 THE EAILWAY ENGINEEE
Peace in the several counties. The Clerk of the Peace
at Preston kept his office shut on the Sunday, con-
sidering that the order as to Sunday opening applied
to the Board of Trade only. The railway promoters
took a different view, and stormed the office, and flung
their plans in through the broken windows.
The Eastern Counties Company ran eighteen or
twenty special trains for their various projected lines.
" The majority of the plans from the provinces," says' the
Mwning Chronicle, " have been sent up by express trains, and
it is whispered that those companies with the locomotives at
their command, and to whom the lines belonged, availed them-
selves of this advantage to such an extent for the exclusive
transmission of their own plans and sections, as actually to
refuse special trains to their competitors."
One competing company was driven to the stratagem
of enclosing their plans and the clerk in charge in a
hearse in order to obtain a special train from a rival
company.
Curious illustration of the degree to which rail-
way enterprise monopolised the services of the
engineering profession may be furnished from both
ends of the scale. That competent engineers were
fully employed is natural enough, but so deep were
their engagements, and so satisfactory to them their
terms of remuneration, that when in 1845 Mr. James
Morrison, M.P., urged on the Government the propriety
of holding an inquiry conducted by some competent
and expert authority, Lord Dalhousie, who at this time
was at the head of the Eailway Department of the
Board of Trade, took refuge in the excuse " that he
really could not find a person competent from his
DEMAND FOR ENGINEERS 75
qualifications for such a commission, as the railway
companies had engrossed all the talent available for
the purpose."^ Mr. Brunei was said to be connected
with fourteen lines, Mr. Kobert Stephenson with thirty-
four, Mr. Locke with thirty-one, Mr. Vignoles with
twenty-two, Sir John Eennie with twenty, and Mr.
Eastrick with seventeen.
At the other end of the scale the demand was equally
fierce. Mr. Williams, in his excellent volume, Our Iron
Roads, describes the demand which arose for even the
humblest service in the following terms : —
" Innumerable surveyors and levellers were required, and
in many instances they made from six to fifteen guineas a
day ; while numbers of persons were employed who were
acquainted with only the rudiments of the art, and who,,
by their blunders, subsequently occasioned even fatal incon-
venience to the enterprises in which they were concerned. The
extravagant payment that was offered also induced great
numbers to leave situations they occupied in order to learn
the new business; while professors, lecturers, and teachers
announced classes, lectures, and private instruction which,
with almost magical celerity, would convert all persons of
ordinary powers into practical men, earning enormous pay-
ments. Still the demand was not equal to the wants of the
case. Surveyors and levellers became worth their weight
in gold, and countless amateurs presented themselves. A
peddling stationer, who long itinerated in Northumberland
and Durham, earned 'five guineas a day and his expenses'
on a southern railroad ; and the Lancaster Guardian stated
that a fat neighbour, long unemployed, obtained an engagement
of three guineas. * I could have had five/ said he, ' but it
would have been in a county where the gradients were severe
and too trying for my wind'; and he preferred three guineas
* The Influence of English Railway Legislation on Trade and Industry^
by JAMES MORRISON (1848), p. 25.
76 THE RAILWAY ENGINEER
and a level line. No fewer than eighty surveyors arrived in
Lancaster in one day for the York and Lancaster line only, and
they were followed by another batch a few days afterwards."
No record of strange adventures has been preserved
as to the persons and plans that raced to the Board of
Trade on that eventful Sunday on behalf of the lines
with which Mr. Fowler was concerned, but without
doubt they were all involved in the general turmoil.
The following passage of a letter, dated 5th March,
1890, from Mr. Bernard Wake, recalled to Sir John
Fowler some of the incidents of that time.
"What strides the world has made since the 1844 days,
when the Sheffield and Lincolnshire Railway was launched.
You and I, with divers others, were busy then at Brigg for
days together, without going to bed ; and eyes got red and
hearts got heavy when plans did not arrive from London.
Carriages were at the door to deposit them, but the clock
stole on, time was up, and plans were lacking, and the Sheffield
and Lincolnshire scheme appeared to be 'as dead as a door
nail.' You will recall those early days of railways. I well
remember travelling from Brigg fast asleep the whole way to
Sheffield with R. I. Gainsford. He, when we got to Sheffield,
thought we were at the first toll-bar out of Brigg. . . . We
had been sleepless for days, only catching bits of sleep whilst
examining books of reference, especially R. I. Gainsford, who in
reading, half asleep, mistook his own finger-end for a spider
running over the paper !
"Then one recalls, in 1845, 'The Great Grimsby, Sheffield,
the Potteries, and Grand Junction Railway,' otherwise 'The
Great Grouse, Trout, Ling-besom, and Billberry Junction Rail-
way,' otherwise ' The Flute Railway ' ; and how the Derbyshire
hills were to be pierced years ago, if that scheme had been
acceptable to Parliament."
In*after life Fowler was fond of telling a story which
relates to this period ; how an excited railway promoter
MANCHESTER SHEFFIELD, AND LINCOLNSHIEE 77
arrived at dead of night in a coach-and-four at his
father's house of Wadsley Hall, where the young
engineer happened to be. Mr. Fowler was roused
from sleep, and found that his visitor wished him to
undertake the engineering of a line from Leeds to
Glasgow, and had brought an order for £20,000 as
a payment on account of survey expenses. It wanted
only a few weeks of the time before the day of deposit-
ing the plan. Mr. Fowler prudently declined what, to
a young man, must have been a tempting offer, and the
coach-and-four drove off into the night.
His main work for the next few years was the laying
out of the group of railways then being promoted from
Sheffield — the Sheffield and Lincolnshire, the Great
Grimsby, the New Holland, the East Lincolnshire, and
others, which finally became amalgamated under the
title of the Manchester, Sheffield, and Lincolnshire.
For the construction of these Mr. Fowler was the chief
engineer, and on him fell the responsibility of carrying
the necessary legislation through Parliament.
Among the papers relating to this period are the
memoranda of " Information prepared for the Kail-
way Department of the Board of Trade, in con-
formity with their circular of November 28th, 1844,"
with respect to the Sheffield and Lincolnshire Junction
Eailway, and also with respect to the Great Grimsby
and Sheffield Junction Kailways. The memorandum
with regard to the last line records inter alia that at a
meeting at Great Grimsby on November 1st, 1844 (the
Right Hon. the Earl of Yarborough in the chair), the
following resolution, proposed by Edward Heneage,
M.P. for Grimsby, seconded by T. G. Cobbett, Esq.,
of Helsham, was unanimously carried : —
78 THE EAILWAY ENGINEER
" That this meeting, having considered the report of John
Fowler, Esq., the engineer of the railway company, is of
opinion that the route recommended by him vid Glandford
Brigg is the best that can be adopted for accomplishing
the objects in view, and is entitled to the support of the
landed proprietors of North Lincolnshire."
Both documents attest the comparative simplicity
and ease of the engineering of the lines, and the great
benefit which they would give as part of a trunk line
between Manchester, Sheffield, and the eastern ports.
The Great Grimsby line was a favourite at one time
with speculators. Everyone gambled in shares, and, as
in all gambling, choice was determined by the merest
trifles. If a line were fortunate, promoters would
endeavour to appropriate as much of its name as they
could for other lijies, in the hope that their particular
venture would gain by the association. As an instance,
Mr. Fowler's Great Grimsby Eailway was at a premium,
and consequently we are told the name of Great Grimsby
was frequently brought in quite irrespective of geo-
graphical facts. This was done to such an extent that
the Earl of Devon, at that time chairman of the rail-
way committee, on one occasion was heard to exclaim,
11 What! Great Grimsby again ! Go it, Great Grimsby!"
The Manchester, Sheffield, and Lincolnshire (now the
Great Central Kailway), in the construction of which
Mr. Fowler wTas largely employed, consisted, in 1846,
of an amalgamation of the Sheffield, Ashton-under-
Lyne and Manchester, the Great Grimsby and Sheffield
Junction, the Sheffield and Lincolnshire, the Sheffield
and Lincolnshire Extension, and the Great Grimsby
Dock Companies. In 1847 a further amalgamation
was made with the Manchester and Lincoln Union
THE GEEAT CENTEAL 79
Company. The whole was then dissolved, and incorpo-
rated as the Manchester, Sheffield, and Lincolnshire, by
the Consolidation Act of 1849. The subsequent ex-
tension of the line, and its recent successful invasion of
London as the Great Central, are matters of history.
During the long period when it was content to be a
junior partner to one or other of the great trunk lines,
its ambition was more restricted. The original con-
ception seems to have been the formation of a trunk
line running from east to west. The traffic to London,
however, has a tendency to deflect all " trunk" opera-
tions to the south, and when the Manchester, Sheffield,
and Lincolnshire Railway met in its course the Great
Northern Eailway, there naturally came to be some
exchange of running powers. The tasting of the traffic
to the " Great Wen," as Cobbett used to call our ever-
expanding Metropolitan area, whetted the appetite of
the Sheffield managers, who, after nearly half a century
of gradual advance, have at length pushed their way
into the position of a first-class but somewhat impover-
ished railway, with a terminus in London.
The facts, though they are only pertinent here as the
later history of a line with the early portions of which
Mr. Fowler was concerned, are thus given in Mr.
Grinling's History of the Great Northern Railway : —
" On March 1st, 1848, the Great Northern Eailway Company
began its first work as public carriers on a length of about
30 miles of railway from Louth to New Holland-on-Humber
(opposite Hull). Nearly half this route, namely the 14 miles
from Louth to Great Grimsby, was completely under Great
Northern control by lease from the East Lincolnshire Company,
and the remainder was worked over by arrangement with its
owners, the Manchester, Sheffield and Lincolnshire, who in
return worked over the East Lincolnshire to Louth."
80 THE EAILWAY ENGINEER
Mr. Cubitt, the superintending engineer of the Great
Northern Kail way, unfortunately died at this juncture,
and his place was filled by Mr. Edward Bury.
"Under his superintendence and that of Mr. (now Sir)
John Fowler, who was engineer both to the East Lincolnshire
and to the Manchester, Sheffield, and Lincolnshire (eastern
section), the traffic from Louth to New Holland was efficiently
conducted."
The Great Northern Kail way was at this time, 1848,
a keen competitor in the race to the North. " King "
Hudson was still managing the interests of the Midland
Kailway, which as yet had no access to the Metropolis.
A proposal made by Hudson to extend the Midland
from Leicester to Hitchin and there to make a junction
with the Great Eastern Kailway, had been successfully
resisted by the Great Northern. The position of the
Great Northern, as its chairman, Mr. Denison, pointed
out in February, 1848, was practically secure. It must
form the southern portion of the East Coast line between
London and the North. Its main line, between York
and Peterborough, had, however, still to be made, and
the Company, owing to the stringency of the money
market, was confining itself to pushing on a circuitous
bit of loop line round some of the Lincolnshire towns.
A Deviation Bill, which the company was promoting
in regard to this loop connection with the North, was
unexpectedly thrown out, and their strong position
was, for the moment, jeopardised. The situation is
thus explained by the historian of the Great Northern
Railway : —
" This (the rejection of the Deviation Bill) was an alarming
event for the Great Northern Board, for it threatened com-
pletely to upset the plans which had led them to make the
EAILWAY POLITICS 81
loop before the towns line; but fortunately they found a
fairly satisfactory makeshift in an alliance with the Man-
chester, Sheffield, and Lincolnshire. This company, as we
know, had powers for a branch from its main line at Clar-
borough, about five miles east of Ketford, to join the Great
Northern loop at Saxelby, from which point the Great
Northern had granted it running rights into Lincoln in return
for similar rights over the Manchester, Sheffield, and Lincoln-
shire from Ketford to Sheffield; and although the Sheffield
directors (whose chairman, Lord Yarborough, was an old
London and York committeeman) had intended postponing
the construction of this branch till better times, they now
acceded to the Great Northern proposal that the line should
be made at once, so that the Great Northern might use it
for through traffic in place of the just rejected Gainsborough
to Kossington line. Accordingly Mr. John Fowler was in-
structed by the Sheffield Board to put the work immediately
in hand, while at the same time, and with the same object,
the Great Northern directors let a further contract to Messrs.
Peto and Betts for the section of their main line from Eetford
to Doncaster."
This alliance with the Great Northern Eailway put
the Lincolnshire lines and the ports of Boston, Grimsby,
and Hull in direct communication with London as well
as with Lancashire.
In April, 1849, came the collapse of the Eailway
King. Hudson resigned the chairmanship of the
Midland, which for the moment subsided into the
position of a second-class line, and abandoned the com-
petition with the Great Northern Railway for the access
to London. The fact largely increased the importance
of the Manchester, Sheffield, and Lincolnshire. An
alliance at Retford between the Great Northern Rail-
way and the Manchester, Sheffield, and Lincolnshire
lines provided an alternative route to Manchester,
G
82 THE KAILWAY ENGINEER
and threatened a formidable competition to the
London and North Western Kailway. The London and
North Western Kailway therefore became anxious to
conciliate the smaller company, and, for a period, the
Manchester, Sheffield, and Lincolnshire line was
detached from its alliance with the Great Northern
Eailway. Under the guidance of Mr. Allport, at this
time general manager of the Manchester, Sheffield, and
Lincolnshire, the facilities given to the Great Northern
traffic were withdrawn, and the running powers made
as inconvenient as possible.
These alliances, ruptures, and reprisals did not bring
much prosperity to the Manchester, Sheffield, and
Lincolnshire rail, a line whose ambitions have always
seemed to be in excess of its resources. In 1853 a
committee was appointed with a view of inaugurating
a policy of retrenchment, and Mr. (afterwards Sir)
Edward Watkin was appointed manager. Sir Edward's
subsequent conduct of the railway into many am-
bitious, and ultimately successful enterprises, does not
quite fit in with that limitation of expense which
was one, at least, of the original objects of his appoint-
ment.
The relations between Mr. Watkin and Mr. Fowler
were at first cordial, but the affairs of the line hardly
gave scope enough for two men of very masterful
character, and before long considerable friction was
set up between them, and Mr. Fowler's connection with
the railway gradually ceased.
The Manchester, Sheffield, and Lincolnshire con-
tinued its alliance with the West Coast confederacy
till 1857, when another reconstruction of interests
was made — the beginning of the so-called fifty years'
EAILWAY POLITICS 83
agreement between the Great Northern and the
Sheffield Companies. In 1861 a breach of this agree-
ment, as it was regarded by the Great Northern
Kail way, was made by the Sheffield directors, who
entered into an alliance with the Midland, then re-
covering itself from its earlier misfortunes.
It seems, indeed, to have been the policy of this line
to play off the different trunk lines one against the
other. This alliance with the Midland accentuated
the rivalry between the Midland and the Great
Northern Eailways, and, when the Great Northern
withdrew certain facilities granted to it at King's Cross
for coal traffic, the Midland thought itself forced to
push on and obtain independent access to London —
action which resulted in the Midland's successful ex-
tension to St. Pancras in 1868.
Many years later, in 1880, Mr. Fowler was concerned
in an incident which proved of considerable importance
in the tangled history of railway politics in connection
with the Manchester, Sheffield, and Lincolnshire Kail-
way. The inhabitants of Huddersfield were anxious
to obtain a connection with the Great Northern Kailway
more direct than the existing one which ran over a
portion of the Lancashire, Yorkshire, and the Man-
chester Sheffield route, and, as a necessary part of this
Bill, applied for compulsory powers over a portion of
the Great Northern Kailway. This railway, as joint
owner of the West Kiding and Grimsby line, felt
bound to oppose. The Manchester, Sheffield, and
Lincolnshire did not appear until Mr. Fowler, who
with Mr. Fraser was acting for the promoters, and was
also consulting engineer to the Great Northern Kail-
way, was put into the witness-box to announce that a
84 THE RAILWAY ENGINEER
compromise had been arrived at between the directors
of the Great Northern Kailway and the promoters of
the Huddersfield connection. The Manchester, Sheffield,
and Lincolnshire Eailway thereupon instructed counsel
to appear and protest against the agreement which had
been accepted by its partner. As a result of this, and
other opposition, the Bill, or rather the compromise
founded thereon, was lost.
This episode led to an attack by the Huddersfield
interest on the agreement then subsisting between the
Great Northern Railway and the Manchester, Sheffield,
and Lincolnshire.* Notwithstanding their opposition,
however, the so-called fifty years' agreement was
sanctioned by the Railway Commission for another
period of ten years. The alliance continued in force
with intervals of more or less animated misunder-
standing till, in 1892, the Manchester, Sheffield, and
Lincolnshire obtained independent access to London
under the title of the Great Central. All this is an
anticipation of events, introduced here to show how
those early labours of Mr. Fowler led to great and
important extensions of enterprise.
We shall have abundant opportunity later to describe
some of Fowler's engineering triumphs. We dwell
here rather on some of the social and economic results
which followed, or seemed likely to follow, on the open-
ing of this new country to railway communications.
The business of railway construction had now entered
on its prosaic period, and the work of John Fowler
did not differ from that of many of his compeers. It
was characterised, we can imagine, by its thoroughness
and common sense. He was, it has always been said
* GRINLING, p. 339.
THE DUTY OF AN ENGINEER 85
of him, a good shareholder's engineer. He himself has
described the policy which he pursued.
" It is not the business of an engineer to build a fine bridge
or to construct a magnificent engineering work for the purpose
of displaying his professional attainments, but, whatever the
temptation may be, his duty is to accomplish the end and aim
of his employers by such works and such means as are, on the
whole, the best and most economically adapted for the purpose."
The self-effacement of the engineer who sees that
his business is to make a railway, and not to raise
a monument to his own ingenuity, deserves recognition.
The railway system of this country is a monument not
to any single reputation, but to the common sense and
business capacity of a great army of railway con-
structors. The success of a work at this period is to
be measured rather by the comparatively commonplace
and simple character of its construction than by its
boldness and ingenuity. The demand, in railway work,
for those gigantic and difficult undertakings which
strike the imagination had not as yet arisen, and was
not yet justified. Naturally, the easier gradients and
the less venturesome experiments were attempted first.
It was the engineer's business to avoid rather than to
seek difficult and adventurous expedients.
The interest of the work of this period is therefore
rather for the economist than for the engineer. It had
hitherto been a complaint that the agricultural interest
had been neglected by the railway, but this group of
railways made a new departure, and became instru-
mental in connecting the manufacturing Midland towns
with the rural districts of Lincolnshire, and with im-
portant harbours on the eastern coast.
86 THE RAILWAY ENGINEER
Mr. Samuel Sidney, the ingenious author of the
Railway System, a work published in 1846, states the
position in the following terms. He observed
"that, while in purely agricultural districts produce sells
at barely remunerative prices, while timber rots in the woods
for want of a market, and the peasantry shiver through the
winter (for want of better fire than faggots gathered by their
landlord's sufferance afford), from one and the same cause — the
absence of means of conveyance to a market — rich coal mines
remain unopened, and there is in the manufacturing districts
a much greater demand for agricultural produce than can be
easily satisfied. The demand for a luxury affords some idea
of the demand for absolute necessaries. When we learn from
Captain Lawes' evidence that Manchester consumes in the
season from ten to twelve tons of cucumbers a week, we can
form some idea of the enormous demand for bread, meat,
butter, cheese, and poultry. . . . Our agriculturalists have
just received, or imagine they have received, a heavy blow and
deep discouragement. They fear low prices, and the cries of
alarm are loudest and deepest from those most distant from the
vast increasing and unceasing demand for all that farms pro-
duce, made by the great Metropolis and the manufacturing
counties. There has been a talk of compensation for the
agricultural interest. The best, the only real compensation,
will be found in extending the farmers' markets and giving
him thousands for customers where he had only hundreds
before for his purchasers, the range of cities instead of the
neighbouring village. This can only be done by an extension
of the railway system, and that on such a scale that it shall be
worth the while of the company to attend to agricultural
traffic. At present the parish roads all converge towards the
highways and the nearest town or village ; in future these
roads must be turned toward the railway station. We shall
then see, on market days, farmers proceeding with their stock
of produce to a roadside railway station, provided as the focus
of a circle of farms. To the farmer to whom the choice will
A SIDE-LIGHT ON FOWLEE'S WOEK 87
be open of sending his bullocks or butter, cheese or corn, to
London or to Lancashire, as he pleases — who can join with his
neighbours in having a cargo of bones, oilcake, or guano, fresh
from the ship side, who can buy the draining tiles, timber, iron,
limestone, and coal wholesale, where formerly he bought it in
retail — a new existence, a new course of profit will be opened.
It is to such compensation as this that he must look to replace
the protection that he lost the other day."
Two years later, Mr. Sidney rode through North
Lincolnshire, and published, somewhat after the manner
of Arthur Young, a small volume, entitled, Rough
Notes of a Ride over the Track of the Manchester,
Sheffield, Lincolnshire, and other Railways, 1848.
His object, he says, was
" to notify to the agricultural and railway world what railways
could do for Lincolnshire and what Lincolnshire could do for
railways cheaply constructed and liberally worked. I took
Lincolnshire for an example of what the like connection might
effect in every other agricultural county, where, as in the case
of the East Lincolnshire and the Manchester, Sheffield, and
Lincolnshire, the companies and the engineer had determined
to make their lines a useful ' implement of commerce ' for the
accommodation of all classes."
Events have moved more slowly, and perhaps not
exactly on the lines predicted by this acute observer,
but the description which he gives of the Lincolnshire
of that day, and of the expectations of an enlightened
advocate of railways with regard to this corner of
England where it was Mr. Fowler's fortune to be
largely employed, warrant us in reproducing some of
his remarks.
The phrase of the engineer (who is not named
by Mr. Sidney) that the railway is to be " a useful
88 THE EAILWAY ENGINEER
implement of commerce" is at once happy and accurate.
Under the new era of free trade, the future develop-
ment of a country or district was to depend on the
ability of its inhabitants to organise an industry
such as would enable them to sell their products in,
and to draw their supplies from, the open markets of
the commercial world. This, it was fully expected,
might bring about a revolution in the industrial
employments of the people. As regards English
agriculturalists, who were not likely to become ex-
porters, the advent of foreign supplies in the home
market seemed a dangerous source of competition.
English land and climate, however, is not so poor, and
the English farmer is not so devoid of ingenuity that
English agriculture need be driven from the markets
which lie at his gate.
In the passage already quoted, Mr. Sidney indicates
the fallacy of supposing that before the era of the
newly -increased facilities for exchange the labourer
enjoyed a golden age of comfort and prosperity. A
few years earlier the whole labouring population of the
land had been partially supported by the poor rate.
The parochial system, a survival in pseudo- philan-
thropic guise of a repressive feudalism, confined the
labourer by a delusive guarantee of poor-law main-
tenance to the place of his settlement. The railway
system, first by creating an entirely new industry, and
so giving employment to many, and then by promoting
a migration from districts where labour was congested
to industrial centres, where remunerative wages were
to be earned, was in itself a useful implement of
commerce, which, even if, or may we not say because,
it allowed certain old and badly remunerative indus-
EAILWAYS AND AGKICULTUEE 89
tries to decay, was on the whole to the advantage of
mankind. As Mr. Sidney goes on to point out, the
railway opened to the agriculturalist new markets for
his old products, and suggested to him new forms of
enterprise. In return, he became a purchaser of fuel
and other products from the manufacturing districts,
which added to his comfort, and also of manures and
agricultural machinery, which added to the efficiency of
his labour, and to the capital value of the land.
In early railway expansion the growth of goods
traffic seems to have been generally much below
expectation, and the success of the new movement
was assured rather by the volume of passenger traffic,
which proved much in excess of calculation. The
arrangements even at the terminal stations were not
sufficiently organised to allow of the successful dis-
tribution of large quantities of agricultural produce.
This, it may be said, is a distinct branch of the great
industry of distribution, and required, and indeed
still requires, much time and ingenuity before it is
put on a satisfactory footing.
The group of railways now under consideration
seems to have given, from the first, much attention
to this important extension of their business. Mr.
Hudson, the Eailway King, has been credited with
the merit of inducing the Eastern Counties Eailways
to make liberal additions to their stations in the
way of pens and cattle sheds and warehouses for
grain.
"Already," says Mr. Sidney, "much has been done. For
instance, we know that on the eastern coast the straw yards
(where that manure is made which is one of the main prin-
ciples of successful cultivation) are filled by lean cattle
90 THE KAILWAY ENGINEEE
imported from Devonshire, Herefordshire, Yorkshire, and Scot-
land, and even Ireland. These beasts formerly travelled at the
rate of 10 miles a day along the roads under the care of
drivers. They are now despatched by rail in as many hours
as days by the road system, one man doing the duty of five,
without dogs."
He goes on to tell of 400 beasts conveyed within
twenty - four hours from the moors of Cumberland
to the turnip farms of Norfolk without the loss
of a beast or a pound of flesh, and remarks that the
same beasts, fattened, would probably find their way
to Smithfield. "This," he adds, "may be taken as
a sample of many hundred unchronicled transactions
of the same kind every year." On the shifting of
the course of commerce occasioned by railways in
this neighbourhood, he makes some interesting com-
ment. The forest district of Nottingham and North
Lincolnshire formerly had a profitable trade, con-
ducted without the aid of a railway, with the clothing
population of Yorkshire and the town of Manchester,
until the easy conveyance between Manchester,
Sheffield, York, and Hull, and other towns diverted
their best customers to markets within railroad reach.
In the evidence given before the committee on the
Manchester, Sheffield, and Lincolnshire Kailways it
was stated that Worksop and East Ketford had both
lost trade owing to the competitors which the new
railway system had brought into markets of which
they formerly had a monopoly. These small and
temporary inconveniences, he justly remarks, are
definite and easily formulated, while it is difficult to
give any statistical account of the innumerable
advantages which railway communications have con-
PARLIAMENTARY JEALOUSY 91
ferred on all classes. Mr. Smith of Deanston, a
celebrated agricultural authority of the day, giving
evidence before a committee of the House of Commons
in 1846, calculated that on a typical farm the result
of the cheapness and facility of transport produced
by railway communications would amount to an
advantage to the farmer of about 10s. an acre. He
further entertained the opinion that railways would
be found useful "for the purpose of mixing soils,"
and he seemed to contemplate even a larger use of
the railway in this respect than the transport of
manure and lime and sand, which is an everyday
occurrence at the present time.
With regard to the ferries and docks which were
a special feature in this particular group of railways,
Mr. Sidney takes a liberal and sensible view.
" Parliament," he says, " has lately displayed great jealousy
with regard to granting any powers beyond carrying powers to
railway companies. Objections have successfully been urged
to their becoming owners of docks, ferries, steamboats, and
other appliances for assisting or increasing traffic beyond the
limits of railway termini. In the only instances in which
railway companies have obtained such powers, the public have
obtained better docks and steamboats than they would other-
wise have enjoyed. The result of what certain ignorant M.P.'s.,
misled by sounds, have called a monopoly, has been superior
accommodation for the public at a cheaper rate. I do not
think there would be any difficulty in proving that the public
would gain practically, especially the agricultural public, by
permitting every railway company terminating in a seaport
town to have, not only access to, but the whole control and
possession of a dock and warehouses. A railway company
of large capital would be able to disregard any profits on, say,
half a million, sunk in docks and warehousing in consideration
92 THE RAILWAY ENGINEER
of the large additional traffic which would be attracted by a
liberal style of conducting business.
"In bones and other foreign tillages, with the exception
of guano, a considerable proportion of the price is composed
of the cost of transfer and retransfer. For instance, bones
from North Germany are carted from the shipside to a ware-
house, and from thence to a railway station. Every day our
farmers, as they progress in scientific farming, are more depen-
dent on these importations of foreign tillages. In the hands
of a railway company, bones and many other matters would be
moved from the ship to the warehouse direct, and, frequently,
under an arrangement with the importer, from the ship to
trucks which, without halt, would convey the whole cargo
direct to some inland depot at a saving which may be calculated
from the fact that the cost of carting a puncheon of rum from
St. Katherine's to a railway station exceeds the whole freight
from London to Rotterdam. A grocer, before the committee
on the Lincolnshire Railways, proved that it was cheaper to
send a hogshead of sugar from the London Docks by sea, round
to Gainsborough and thence to Sheffield, than to cart it to the
Camden Town station of the London and North Western
Railway. It is, of course, on articles of low value that small
savings in the cost of conveyance tell.
" In certain situations, steam mills and abattoirs might
advantageously form part of the scheme of railway stations,
even if let off to tenants. Killing beasts, like burying human
beings within the limits of towns, will soon, it is to be hoped,
be rendered penal. The next step will be to make in each
important town a railway beast market and slaughter-house.
These companies are corporations formed to our hands to
secure orderly responsible management. . . . Certain it is that
our railway powers will never afford full advantage to the
public until our legislators look to practical results — not to
the question of whether powers of building, boating, damming,
and docking are contrary to precedent, but whether they will
produce good accommodation at a lower rate than previous
arrangements."
NEW HOLLAND 93
After a fierce struggle the necessary powers for
constructing docks and other adjuncts to the railway
system were obtained. Mr. Sidney thus describes
the works which in 1848 were proceeding at New
Holland :—
"This New Holland, two years ago almost a solitude, was
formerly a famous resort for smugglers of Hollands and prime
tobacco, of late renown, by a ferry to Hull, which with difficulty
supported one coach and one poor alehouse. But Steam, the
great magician of the nineteenth century, had been at work,
and raised monuments of his deeds on all sides. Hundreds
of workmen were engaged in putting the finishing stroke to
a pier, one of the water stations of the Manchester and
Lincolnshire Eailway, which stretched for some 1,500 feet,
like a long black snake, into the Humber as though intended
to end only on the other side, though, in fact, the intentions
of the engineer architect were more modest. The earliest
transit at this spot was by an open boat running chock-a-block
upon the beach. Then came a small wooden pier greatly
descending to low water mark. Then a tub of a steamer on
a narrow, slippery pier ; and now the railroad was extending
itself into the stream far enough for passengers on the Lincoln-
shire side to make but one step from the steam coach to the
steamboat at every state of the tide. A little lower down
the stream, fast advancing too, though not so far advanced, a
dock of three acres was in progress, intended to be surrounded
by sheds for goods and pens for cattle about to be attracted to
New Holland ferry by the convenience of transit. Hull is
at present the real capital of this part of North Lincolnshire,
taking from it a good deal of butcher's meat and supplying
groceries and other domestic requirements, young horses, and
lean cattle."
»
The traveller proceeded from New Holland to
Great Grimsby, remarking on the various features
94 THE RAILWAY ENGINEER
of the railway and the embankments and the agri-
culture.
"I made," he says, "my headquarters at Great Grimsby,
a port until within the last five years so obscure that it
probably owes its place in maps to its privileges as a parlia-
mentary borough."
Formerly the place was of some importance, but
it had gone the way of Tyre and Sidon, and our
own cinque ports of Hythe, Sandwich, and Romney.
Its natural harbour had silted up.
"Within the last few years a succession of events have
tended to make the name of Great Grimsby less absurd. The
increased use of bones, rape seed, oil-cake, and other tillages
largely imported from the north of Europe; the reduction
of the timber duties, the alteration in the corn laws, the
general reduction of tariff on Baltic produce, and lastly and
chiefly, the rapid advance of railway communication, have
all tended to revive the decayed fishing village towards a
position commensurate to its armorial and genealogical claims.
The importation of timber for railway use has quite cast
into the shade the profits formerly netted from contraband
trade," and generally there will be a great expansion of
legitimate industry. " I anticipate," he says, " that warehouses
and steam mills for grinding British and foreign wheat, for
crushing linseed, and sawing timber, will shortly rise up along
the lately dreary quays of Grimsby." In addition to the rail-
way facilities, the directors are "pressing on one of the most
complete and extensive docks in the kingdom from the designs
of Mr. Rendel, the engineer of Birkenhead Docks."
" After examining these works and a railway map, including
not only England, but the opposite shores of the German Ocean,
it was impossible to doubt that railway enterprise would make
Grimsby a great corn market and a great seaport."
"The fish caught by deep-sea fishing off Grimsby cannot
TOEKSEY BEIDGE 95
be surpassed ; cod and turbot are to be had in any quantity,
worthy of the London market, and may be transmitted by
railway to London six hours sooner than if landed in Hull."
Mr. Sidney's prophecies have been better fulfilled
than those made by seers of much greater pretensions.
The making of these railways was not without
incidents of engineering interest. The system included
important works, such as the Wicker viaduct and the
Sheffield Victoria Station, the New Holland floating
bridge, and two fine bridges over the Trent at Gains-
borough and Torksey. With regard to the last a report
addressed to the directors of the Manchester, Sheffield,
and Lincolnshire Railway by Mr. Fowler on February
15th, 1850, recites that
"the line from Leveston to Saxelby was finished in sufficient
time to be opened for public traffic on January 1st, but
objections were made by the inspecting officer to the sufficient
strength of the wrought -iron bridge across the Trent at
Torksey, and the opening to the public has been consequently
postponed. The bridge has been tested with a load three times
as great as will ever be brought upon it in practice; it is
at least as strong as the numerous other wrought-iron bridges
upon the Manchester, Sheffield, and Lincolnshire Eailway,
which had been previously sanctioned by other inspecting
officers; and it is of greater strength than the Conway and
Britannia bridges on the Chester and Holyhead Eailway.
Under these circumstances I cannot recommend any alteration
to be made to it, and I have no doubt the railway commissioners
will shortly rectify the error into which they have unquestion-
ably fallen."
The officer of the Board of Trade who disallowed
the Torksey Bridge was the present Field - Marshal
Sir Lintorn Simmons, then a captain in the Royal
96 THE EAILWAY ENGINEER
Engineers. The incident was a serious one for the
young engineer, and might have had disastrous con-
sequences for his future career. The matter was
argued with considerable warmth, but, as Sir L.
Simmons has assured the author, with good temper
and fairness. It was the beginning of an acquaintance
between the two men, which afterwards ripened into
one of the most valued and intimate friendships of
Sir John Fowler's later years. The controversy of
Torksey Bridge is of some interest and deserves a
fuller narration.
Mr. Scott Russell brought the subject before the
Institution of Civil Engineers on January 29th, 1850.
It was well known, he said, that for some years past
there had been many attempts to restrict the free
exercise of the talent and ingenuity of engineers, and
to interfere with the progress of mechanical and con-
structive science by the establishment of Government
boards and commissions ; almost, in fact, endeavouring
to introduce a system analogous to that of the In-
genieurs des Fonts et Chausse'es, which has proved so
detrimental to all individual enterprise in France. In
the year 1847 a Royal Commission was appointed for
inquiring into the application of iron in structures
exposed to violent concussions and vibration ; it ex-
pressly stated, that " considering the great importance
of leaving the genius of scientific men unfettered for
the development of a subject, as yet so novel and so
rapidly progressive, as the construction of railways,
we are of opinion that any legislative enactments
with respect to the forms and proportions of the
iron structures employed therein would be highly
inexpedient." Relative to the forms of construction
TOKKSEY BEIDGE 97
of hollow girders of wrought iron, it was also stated
' ' those methods appear to possess and to promise
many advantages ; but they are of such recent
introduction that no experience has yet been acquired
of their powers to resist the various actions of sudden
changes of temperature. For the reasons above stated
we are unable to express any opinion upon them."
Almost simultaneously, however, with the issuing of
this report, a girder bridge, built of wrought iron
from the designs and under the superintendence of
an engineer of admitted skill and extensive practice,
was declared by one of the inspecting officers of the
Railway Board to be unfit for the public service,
because it did not conform to the rules, which, in
the report of the commissioners, were expressly
declared to be applicable to cast iron only. The
actual consequence of this decision, or rather of this
application of an antiquated formula to a modern
invention, was that the public had already been for
one month deprived of the use of an important line
of railway, and the probable consequence was the
condemnation of the majority of the railway girder
bridges, which had for years borne with safety the
greatest loads that could be imposed on them under any
circumstances of their traffic, and the possible result
might be the rejection of that magnificent monument
of engineering skill, the Britannia Bridge.
Mr. Scott Eussell hoped that the Institution would
take steps to expostulate against the wrong under
which the public and the profession were suffering.
On February 5th he inquired again what the Council
was doing. Mr. Vignoles supported his appeal, and
complained of the action of the Eailway Commission
H
98 THE KAILWAY ENGINEER
with regard to a bridge built by himself. Mr. Simpson,
vice-president, asked members to send all information
in their power to the secretary. Mr. Fowler's action in
declining to recommend the railway directors to make
any alteration in the Torksey Bridge was without doubt
supported by the opinion of the leading members of his
profession.
On March 12th, 1850, Mr. "William Cubitt in the
chair, Mr. William Fairbairn read a paper on " Tubular
Girder Bridges," with special reference to Torksey
Bridge. A difference of opinion, he said, appeared
to exist: (1) As to the application of a given formula
for computing the strength of wrought-iron tubular
bridges ; (2) as to the excess of strength that should
be given to a tubular iron bridge over the greatest
load that can be brought upon it ; and (3) as to the
effect of impact, and the best mode of testing the
strength and proving the security of the bridge. After
a technical discussion, in which he criticises some of the
proportions of the Torksey Bridge, he sums up :—
" These appear to be the facts of the case, and although the
principal girders do not attain the standard of strength which
the author has ventured to recommend as the limit of force,
they are, nevertheless, sufficiently strong to render the bridge
perfectly secure."
The discussion of the paper lasted over several
evenings.
Mr. Fowler, who was of course present, expressed
his gratification at the result of Mr. Fairbairn's in-
vestigation, but pointed out that no allowance had
been made for the additional strength of a continuous
girder. This, he calculated, would add " one-fourth
TOKKSEY BKIDGE 99
to the absolute strength of the girder spanning each
opening."
In building the first of these girder bridges (the
subject being new to him) Mr. Fowler stated that
he had been guided by Mr. Fairbairn's proportions,
as he was the constructor of the girders, and he
complained that Mr. Fairbairn had now changed his
views with regard to the requisite proportions, and, as
Mr. Fowler maintained, without sufficient reason.
Mr. Bidder, who along with other engineers had also
been requested to examine the bridge, reported that
after careful inspection and consideration the general
opinion arrived at was that the bridge was sufficiently
strong for all practical purposes of public safety.
That, he gathered, was Mr. Fairbairn's opinion, though
he had detracted from the value and weight of that
verdict by assigning other proportions for a bridge
of such dimensions. He proceeded to question some
of Mr. Fairbairn's minor conclusions. Mr. Wild and
Mr. Pole had also examined the bridge, and were
satisfied that it was of sufficient strength. Indeed,
throughout the lengthened debate, opinion in this
respect was unanimous, but naturally some difference
of opinion existed as to the precise additional value
of the continuous girder and other technical points.
Captain Simmons, in the course of the discussion,
admitted that he had made no allowance for the fact
that the girder was a continuous beam, " because he
believed the beam was not so constructed over the
central pier as to support all the strain which might
be brought upon it, and therefore he thought the paper
which had been read, however interesting, did not apply
to the case in question."
100 THE EAILWAY ENGINEEE
The controversy dragged on for some months, and
month by month the Kailway Commissioners postponed
the opening of the line. During March, elaborate ex-
periments were carried out, with the assistance of
Mr. Wild and Mr. Pole, in the presence of Captain
Simmons and Captain Laffan.
"The experiments," says Captain Simmons in his report,
"were made with great care, and are therefore to be fully
relied on, Mr. Eowler, assisted by Messrs. Wild and Pole,
having afforded every possible facility and assistance in render-
ing them trustworthy."
In conclusion he states :—
"I am induced to recommend that the company be per-
mitted to use this bridge for public traffic, provided the
engineer will make such an arrangement of the platform
that the ballast cannot be allowed to accumulate beyond the
depth of two inches, upon which consideration was based his
calculation of the weight of the structure, and also that
careful tests should be applied from time to time, with
occasional inspections by an officer of this department, who
would report whether by the effect of traffic the elasticity
of the metal, giving the effect of continuity to the bridge
over the two spans, remains unimpaired."
On April 6th the commissioners announced that on
these terms they had reconsidered their decision, and
formal permission was given for the opening of the line
on the 25th of April.
"Thus," concludes the official notice, signed by the Secre-
tary of the Institution of Civil Engineers, " had an important
line of railway been arbitrarily closed for a period of upwards
of four months, and a bridge been condemned as unsafe which,
when examined by practical engineers, had been proved to
AKTICLE ON RAILWAY ACCIDENTS 101
possess ample strength, and all this in consequence of the
attempt to introduce the system of centralisation and of
Government supervision, which was found to be so pernicious
in continental states, and the employment of officers who pos-
sessed undoubted skill for their own military duties, but who
were placed in a false position when they were entrusted with
the execution and control of civil works, of which their
previous pursuits precluded their obtaining a practical know-
ledge."
Many years afterwards, in an article on Eailway
Accidents in the Nineteenth Century for June, 1877,
Fowler alluded to this episode in the following terms : —
"An Englishman is naturally impatient of State inter-
ference with any private enterprise in which he has invested
his capital, and in the earlier days of railway inspections by
the Board of Trade the proceedings of the inspecting officers
were suspiciously watched, and sometimes bitterly resented.
In one notable case, where considerable public inconvenience
resulted from a difference of opinion between the inspector
and the company's engineer, official use was made of the
circumstance to illustrate the baneful effect 'of the attempt
to introduce the system of centralisation and of Government
supervision which was found so pernicious in continental
states, and of employing officers who possessed undoubted
skill for their own peculiar military duties, but who were
placed in a false position when they were entrusted with
the execution and conduct of civil works, of which their
previous pursuits precluded their obtaining a practical know-
ledge.' Subsequent events have, nevertheless, conclusively
shown that State control in the construction of railways
does not involve an injurious ' system of centralisation/ but
that it is productive of vast benefit to the public, and even
to the railway officials, as it provides an independent check
of the stability of the works and of the sufficiency and com-
pleteness of arrangements for the safe conduct of traffic."
102 THE KAILWAY ENGINEEE
The article from which the above quotation is taken
is a very judicially conceived criticism of the report
of the Railway Commission of 1874, issued in February,
1877. After making the large admission above quoted,
the article goes on to urge, in the terms of the
commissioners' report, that " any change which would
relieve railway companies from the responsibility which
now rests upon them to provide for the safety of their
traffic would be undesirable." It dissents, however,
strongly from certain recommended invasions of this
principle which the commissioners sought to in-
corporate with it. Their conclusions, Fowler observes,
" exhibit verbal dexterity rather than practical wisdom."
The difficulty of the commission in arriving at a
unanimous decision in respect of these proposed ex-
ceptions is pertinently quoted as a reason for leaving
responsibility in the hands of the executive.
The concluding paragraphs of the article are worth
quoting : —
"It will be gathered from the tenor of our remarks that
thorough and searching inquiry into every alleged sin of
omission and commission on the part of a railway company,
and publicity to the report of the inspecting officers of the
Government, are the remedies which we would substitute for
the legislative interference recommended by the commissioners.
" If it be said that this, after all, is but a poor guarantee
as compared with the legislation deemed necessary by the
commissioners, we would say that the influence of what is
in our opinion the most important of all of the elements
conducive to public safety has been entirely ignored by them,
and that the omission invalidates their conclusions. The
element of ' human fallibility ' has justly received the fullest
consideration from the commissioners, but surely it was no less
essential for them to recognise the existence of the active
THE MORALITY OF COMMEKCE 103
living force 'human sensibility.' How constantly do we hear
of accidents being prevented by the presence of mind, prompt-
ness, and energy of railway officials, and of porters and guards
being cut to pieces in the attempt to save passengers from the
consequences of their own imprudence. There appears no
good reason to exclude the directors of railways from the
possession of ' human sensibility/ even as we must admit that
they are liable to 'human fallibility,' and instances might be
adduced without number in proof of the presence and practical
daily value on railways of the element 'human sensibility.'
Yet, in the report, some of the commissioners gravely assume
that the companies actually balance the probable cost of rail-
way collisions against the cost of works that would obviate
them, and that they are guided in their decision by the appear-
ance of the figures ! If it is to be taken for granted that
engine-drivers and guards are ready to lay down their lives,
superintendents and managers to endure anxiety and mental
anguish hardly less tolerable than death, and directors to incur
the odium attached to a preventable accident merely that an
eighth per cent, greater dividend may be announced to the
shareholders, then it must be concluded that the purchase of
the lines by Government, or a system of legislation infinitely
more stringent and penal than that proposed by any of the
commissioners, can alone ensure the public against the
occurrence and consequences of frequent and preventable
accidents."
This expression of opinion from a man of Fowler's
practical insight is of considerable importance. We
are in this country irrecoverably committed to free
trade and private enterprise. More and more the
principle of exchange is becoming the pivot on which
the delicate machinery of the fabric of civilisation is
made to revolve. If those whose view Fowler is here
combating are right, the relations of commerce are
absolutely impervious to those generous feelings and
104 THE RAILWAY ENGINEER
sentiments which, explain them how we may, we
recognise instinctively as part of our higher nature.
Fowler's protest against this view is timely and
weighty. We hear much talk, and reasonably enough,
of the good citizen, that is the man who brings public
spirit and rectitude to the political and municipal
affairs of his country, but the ground covered by our
political life is infinitesimal compared with the fields
in which effort is organised by the influence of the
market. It is a low and, what is more important, a
false view of human nature which assumes that an
unscrupulous love of gain is a motive predominant in
all industrial undertakings. The prejudice against which
Fowler is here arguing is a most harmful one. It is
unworthy of a great commercial nation like England.
Honour and rectitude and fair dealing are qualities
evolved not by authority, but by and in the mutuality of
exchange. There are dishonest tradesmen just as there
are negligent and corrupt officials. There is no escape
from the fallibility of human nature and from the
occasional predominance of the lower motive, but the
rules and restraints of moral sentiment and conscience
are as appropriate and, at least, as powerful in the
transactions of commerce as in the transactions of the
State.
CHAPTER IV.
PROFESSIONAL CHARACTERISTICS AND WORK
1850-1860
TTTE propose in a later chapter to set out as fully
' » as we can the personal characteristics of the sub-
ject of this biography. Following here the course of his
professional career, we think it important to notice the
somewhat impersonal nature of the work which he
helped to accomplish.
The magnitude and multiplicity of a modern en-
gineer's engagements (and Fowler's career practically
covers the modern period) made it necessary for him
to delegate much of his responsibility, to equip an
office, and to organise a staff of assistants. No
engineer who did not accommodate himself to this
new order of things could be really successful under
the modern conditions then beginning, unless he was
prepared to kill himself with overwork. The develop-
ment of Fowler's professional character was naturally
influenced by these considerations, and the result we
must now endeavour to describe.
In his professional career, the responsibility for great
undertakings, which came upon him early in life,
obliged him to acquire and to develop a capacity for
command.
Apart from his engineering skill, he was emphatically
105
106 PROFESSIONAL CHARACTEEISTICS
a good man of business, a character which, by the
fashionable sentimentalism of the time, is thought to
require some apology. Such a view, however, is super-
ficial. Without the good man of business, neither the
accommodation of the public, the wages of subor-
dinate workers, nor the dividends of investors are
secure. The master mind that gives order, punctuality,
direction, and economy to a number of otherwise
incoherent and wasted forces, and which finally crowns
their co-operation with a great result, must, to a
certain extent, be inexorable and exacting as the laws
of gravitation. All these considerations have without
doubt their influence in forming the manner and
character of men involved in these important responsi-
bilities and employments.
To some extent Fowler was himself conscious of the
necessity under which he lay of acting a part. Personal
considerations, he would frequently say, ought not to
influence our judgment in matters of business. This
opinion was based on reason and experience, and was
not the natural bent of his character. In his own
household he was the most impulsive of men. With
his children and with his servants he was indulgent
to a fault.
We are familiar with the so-called " Paradox of the
Actor," who, when he is depicting the most impassioned
frenzy on the stage, is really in his coolest and most
calculating mood. There is some parallel to this in
what we may call the paradox of the man of business.
Here is a man naturally -genial and impulsive, con-
sciously or unconsciously making himself an impersonal
pivot on which vast industrial operations are made to
revolve. It is his function to conceive a great idea,
HIS POWER OF ORGANISATION 107
to collect the instruments for carrying it into effect,
to lay down the orbits within which each shall move,
and to preserve, by a rigid enforcement of the punctual
and due performance of separate contracts, the con-
nected harmony of the whole. The man who is
accustomed to such great operations, who sees how
their successful conduct leads to the happiness of
mankind, soon learns the necessity of banishing whims
and personal caprice from his moods, and naturally
acquires a certain magnanimity of view.
In discussing the career of his friend and partner, Sir
B. Baker has summed up to the author the nature of
Fowler's success, in the statement that very early in his
professional career Fowler somehow had acquired the
position of being the man to whom persons with a big
project on hand felt obliged to apply. We have it
on high authority that there is no new thing under
the sun, and the truth is one which would be confirmed
by a study of the history of great engineering works.
The scientific imagination is concerned not so much
with new things as with new applications of well-
known principles and facts. Further, the scientific
imagination can achieve very little till it is materialised
by an organising faculty which is not imaginative, but
full of the sober prose belonging to the management
of men and finance.
Fowler was by no means devoid of the scientific
imagination, but undoubtedly the aspect of his charac-
ter which impressed the public was his strength and
dexterity in carrying great proposals to a successful
issue. It has been pointed out that a great invention
or a great idea may lie idle till it is connected with some
motive force which thrusts it into use, in spite of the
108 PROFESSIONAL CHARACTERISTICS
initial frictions which stand in the way of all improve-
ment and change. This truth contains the justification
of patent laws when regarded from the point of view of
the general public. It is an instance of the way in which
the security of private interest is rendered subservient
to the public welfare. The peculiar position attained
by Fowler seems a further illustration of the same truth.
The idea of tunnelling a railway through London is ob-
viously the result of many precedent suggestions, but
it lay dormant for long, in ingenious but ineffectual
hands, and only became actual when the motive forces
to carry it into execution were organised and set in
motion under the guidance of Mr. Fowler.
As a man of affairs Fowler had many remarkable
characteristics. As we turn over the minutes of evi-
dence submitted by him to parliamentary committees,
it is impossible not to be struck by his skilful present-
ment of a case ; his replies to examination in chief are
clear, concise, and to the point, but it was in cross-
examination that he was most persuasive. There he
was deferential and appreciative of the points that
were raised against him. The objection raised, he
would say, had been duly considered by him, indeed,
it was chiefly because his scheme overcame it so com-
pletely that he spoke so strongly in its support ; or
if this line of reply was not applicable, he would urge
that there were difficulties in every alternative, and
that although the objections were put with great force,
they were more easily superable than those which beset
other schemes. There is no attempt at display, no
desire to browbeat or to be witty at the expense of
his questioner, nothing apparent but an eager desire
to bring out the truth by means of fair discussion.
SUCCESS, AN INDEX OF WOKTH? 109
A director of one of the railway companies with
which Fowler was connected bore the following testi-
mony to his persuasive powers : " I never met any
one," he said, "who so often was able to convince me
that things which I had all my life long regarded
as white were really black." There was a genial
sympathy about him that was irresistible. In person,
Fowler was a big, powerful man ; his habit of speech
was direct, yet so kindly and humorous that it never
suggested aggression. Nor did his appearance belie
his character ; he was emphatically a strong man, and
the strong man who can also be conciliatory as a rule
will go far.
It has been remarked by one who knew and admired
him that he seemed at times to attach an undue im-
portance to material success. The remark raises a
fundamental problem of ethics. If, as the evolutionary
school of thinkers maintain, ethical sentiment is the
approval of a body of rules and motives dictated and
sanctioned by the experience of human society, a man
with the experience of Fowler must have observed
that industry, punctuality, the honourable performance
of contract, the considerate and sympathetic rather
than the coercive management of men, self-control
and self-renunciation, the power to resist the tempta-
tion of snatching illegitimate personal advantage, are
the qualities which lead to reputation and permanent
success. In regarding success, therefore, as in some
measure an index of worth, Fowler did not necessarily
take a low view of life.
The point is of some importance, for Fowler seems
to us to be a typical figure. With many personal
and unaccountable idiosyncrasies thrown in, he was
110 PROFESSIONAL CHARACTERISTICS
a product of the time. His success came to him
because he was fully in accord with the spirit of the
new industrial era. It is a vindication of the Economic
Order that a man obviously drawing his inspiration
from that source is found honourable, veracious, and
courageous, in his personal relations kindly and
courteous, and, what perhaps is equally remarkable,
dignified in his leisure by a large and enlightened
appreciation of all that is best in the social life of
the time.
There is no trace in his letters and recorded con-
versation of any introspective questioning of his own
motives and maxims of life. They seem to have been
more or less the spontaneous outcome of his own
experience. His native conservatism and his con-
stitutional respect for that which is and must be, his
aversion from revolutionary views, made him a strong
supporter of Church and State, but he was not a
man whose deliberate actions were dictated by effusive
sentiment, nor was he given to that abstraction of
thought which is characteristic of martyrs and re-
formers.
He was, in short, an example of a man of the
strictest integrity with whom the sanctions of right
conduct are practical intuitions rather than a rule of
life based on religious or philosophic theory.
The following appreciation of his characteristics as
an engineer is compiled from information given by
those who were for many years associated with him
in business.
He was professionally a man of great moral courage,
very prompt to face a difficulty. It is a very usual
thing for engineers to follow precedent closely in
HIS PROFESSIONAL COUEAGE 111
difficult situations. Fowler, however, was very cour-
ageous in making new departures. Thus, notwith-
standing his admiration and friendship for Brunei,
when on the death of that great man he was
appointed his successor as consulting engineer to the
Great Western Railway, he urged the directors to face
the loss of entirely abandoning the broad gauge.
He took the lead, also, in recommending the use of
iron or steel in bridges instead of timber, and also
he was among the first to urge the employment of
steel instead of iron rails. His use of Portland cement
concrete for retaining walls was also an innovation.
A well-qualified critic thus sums up his professional
character : —
"As an engineer he had of course many equals from a
scientific point of view, but he was so eminently practical
that nothing beat him, and his power of dealing with men
was wonderful. He had the faculty of 'spotting' a fault
in an opposition scheme better than most men, and this
applies also to drawings or designs brought to him by his
own assistants for approval."
He used laughingly to say that if he did not
understand a thing at once he never understood it,
and certainly his rapidity of judgment was very
remarkable.
It is no part of our plan to gibbet the subject of
this biography as that abnormal monster a perfect
man. In the course of his professional career Sir
John Fowler had a good many controversies, which,
as might be expected, he pursued with much deter-
mination ; for though there was nothing vindictive in
his nature he was very unbending. He had, indeed,
a considerable share of that quality which the in-
112 PROFESSIONAL CHARACTERISTICS
dulgence of our friends calls firmness, but which in
hostile circles is most unreasonably regarded as
obstinacy. This quality of heart was with him so
spontaneous that he was by no means conscious of
its existence. One of our informants tells us that in
confidential talk he expressed the most unbounded
surprise in detecting what he considered a trait of
obstinacy in one of his children, a quality, he re-
marked, so entirely absent from the character of his
parent.
Of his dealings with contractors, one of the most
difficult personal tasks of the engineer, somewhat
various accounts have been given. With the big and
powerful firms, such was the keenness of his lust for
battle, he was more inclined to be exacting than with
smaller men. In the initiation of engineering projects,
the contractor is a very important element. It is
often he who furnishes the funds for the preliminary
expenses, and at one period of his career Fowler
suffered a good deal from his inability to agree with
certain large and prominent firms. With foemen
worthy of his steel he was more inclined to thresh
out his differences than to accommodate matters by
compromise or concession. The precise equity of
these controversies is not now of any importance.
Such as they were, however, they were undertaken
rather as the result of temperament than from any
desire to snatch an illegitimate advantage. With the
smaller men, we are informed by one whose relations
with Sir John were not always smooth, he was fair
and, as far as his clients' interest would allow, liberal.
The same characteristics were apparent in his rela-
tions with members of his profession and with his
RELATIONS WITH SUBORDINATES 113
subordinates. In matters where the responsibility was
entirely his own he naturally would brook no inter-
ference. In the many relations of an engineer's
business where the responsibility is more or less
divided, he was ready, perhaps eager, to assume a
dictatorial position, a course not to be wondered at
in one of his self-confidence and long experience of
success. He was probably right in thinking that, if
his supreme authority was conceded, the matter in
hand would be better managed than under a divided
direction. On the other hand, if his authority was
questioned in departments where the responsibility of
one of his colleagues was clear, he acquiesced quite
good humouredly in the situation, and recognised that
there might be other masterful men besides himself.
He recognised, in fact, that there were differences in
men, and accommodated himself to that which he could
not bend. It must, however, be admitted that he
liked to be the predominant partner. Being himself
painstaking and industrious he expected his sub-
ordinates to be the same. No one understood better
than he the need of delegating work and responsibility.
His habit was to select his assistants with care, to
put them in charge of considerable undertakings with
a minimum of supervision and direction, and to trust
them. To have been one of Fowler's assistants was
a certificate of proficiency, and a large number of
men who have done and will do their country good
service have been associated with Sir John Fowler
as his trusted assistants. In this way we find that
he had expeditions to France, Spain, Portugal, Algiers,
Italy, and over a series of years to Egypt, the Soudan,
and the Upper Nile.
114 PROFESSIONAL CHARACTERISTICS
There are two sides to most questions, and the
relation between a leading engineer and his assistants
is no exception. In the devolution of work to sub-
ordinates a slight miscalculation may easily throw too
great a burden on individuals, and the demand of the
organiser may appear exacting. The good organiser,
however, will in most cases fit the task to the workman,
and Fowler s skill in this respect was certainly extra-
ordinary. Not a few of those employed by him in
special investigations have become recognised authorities
in those particular lines of work. This selection of
instruments is of course a part of the patronage at the
disposal of a successful engineer, and in a profession
abounding with talent and energy the selected sub-
ordinate is to a certain extent put under an obligation
to his chief. He is given his opportunity. On the
other hand, the period of apprenticeship and sub-
ordination has a way of seeming unduly long to the
ambitious young aspirant and to his friends ; but, as
Adam Smith long ago pointed out, in every free
bargain both sides profit, and there is after all no more
equitable method of settling the value of services than
the give and take of the market.
Fowler was very fortunate in the selection of his
business associates. With many of them his connection
extended over a very long period. His distinguished
partner, Sir Benjamin Baker, entered Mr. Fowler's
office in 1861, and became a member of the firm in
1875, and the record of their co-operation fills a large
chapter in the history of English engineering. Not-
withstanding his undoubtedly imperious character he
had the power of attaching men to him by very warm
ties of admiration and affection.
MR BALDEY 115
" Sir John's disposition," says one who knew him well, both
in business and at home, "was a very affectionate one, and
his home life was very happy. He was a loyal friend, and
I do not remember to have ever heard him speak ill of any
one. He did not by any means make a friend of every one,
but he did not speak against those who were not his friends,
or against those who had offended him."
There is a complete absence of anything in the
nature of personal gossip in his letters, and he had, we
are informed, a very strong objection to what he called
talking people over.
The following letter to his old friend, secretary and
partner, Mr. Baldry, might appear to be an idealised
reminiscence rather than a plain statement of fact.
Mr. Baldry, however, assures the writer that its terms
do not appear to him exaggerated.^ Such a letter
throws a pleasing light on the prosaic routine of the
office at 2, Queen Square Place : —
" THORN WOOD LODGE,
" CAMPDEN HILL, KENSINGTON, W.,
"November 8th, 1888.
" MY DEAR BALDRY, — I wished to say a few words of good-
bye and good wishes to you last night in your own office
before our final business separation, but I saw it was too much
for you to bear, and I must now ask you to let me write the
words which your emotion did not permit you to hear.
" It is, I am sure, permitted to a very limited number
of men to have had the intimate and confidential business
relations which have for thirty-six years subsisted between
you and me, and for both of us to be able to say at the end
* While these pages are passing through the press, the death of Mr.
Baldry at Hyeres is announced (Feb., 1900). Mr. Baldry's amiable and
kindly nature endeared him not only to his partners, but to all who came
in contact with him.
116 PROFESSIONAL CHARACTERISTICS
of the time that not one cool look or one unpleasant word
has ever been known during the long intercourse.
"But the word business expresses very inadequately our
relations. During the last twenty-five years at least you
have really had charge, not only of the private affairs but
almost the consciences of every member of the family, and
have frequently rendered, as we could all testify, the most
essential service.
"Lady Fowler feels everything I would say, but which
it is impossible fully to express. I know every son, and
indeed every member of the family have the same feelings
of regard and gratitude as ourselves.
" I can speak for all the staff in the office, and indeed for
all Westminster, and the numerous persons who come to Queen
Square Place, when I say that no man ever left the scene of
a long and honourable career with more unanimous wishes for
future happiness than you carry away with you.
"But although, my dear Baldry, your health and prudence
require that you should now leave your business chair at
Queen Square Place, you know that my friendship and that
of my family is for life, and it will always be the great hope
and pleasure of Lady Fowler and myself that you should
frequently be our guest both in London and at Braemore.
" I could write many pages, and then I should not tell you
all I think and feel; but you will know our regard and
affection for you, and how sincerely we wish you health,
happiness, and every good wish in your future years.
" Believe me, my dear Baldry,
" Yours very truly,
"JOHN FOWLER."
This letter is somewhat of an anticipation, but it
is quoted here to show that though a man of Fowler's
combative zeal and ubiquitous energy did not
altogether avoid the giving of hard knocks and the
incurring of enmities, he was personally a man of a
very lovable and affectionate disposition.
MARKIAGE 117
In the year 1850 Mr. Fowler married Miss Elizabeth
Broadbent, daughter of Mr. James Broadbent, of
Manchester, a lady with whom he had become ac-
quainted the year before. In many respects John
Fowler is to be described as a fortunate man, but
in nothing was he more fortunate than in his marriage.
The copious correspondence which has been placed at
the biographer's disposal covers a period of nearly fifty
years, and constitutes a continuous testimony to the
warm affection and entire confidence which characterised
the relations between husband and wife. Mr. Fowler,
owing to the calls of his profession, was frequently
absent from home. During these absences he wrorked
with fiery energy, rising at daybreak and putting an
almost incredible amount of work into every twelve
hours, but amid all this pressure of business he
never omitted his daily letter to his wife. Though
for biographical purposes they contain little that is
of public interest they are charming letters, and throw
a most agreeable light on his domestic life and on the
kindly, considerate, and courteous character of the
writer.
Their first home in London was 2, Queen Square
Place, a roomy, old-fashioned house adjoining Bird
Cage Walk. Mr. Fowler's offices were under the same
roof as the dwelling-house. There was a large garden,
and before the building of Queen Anne's Mansions the
situation was cheerful and bright. The house had a
historical interest. Milton had lived hard by, and
had planted in the garden a cotton willow tree, which
was blown down during the Fowlers' tenancy. The
wood was made into a " davenport," and is still a
valued ornament of Lady Fowler's drawing-room. The
118 PKOFESSIONAL CHAKACTEKISTICS
house itself had been the home of Jeremy Bentham,
and the meeting-place of the two Mills, Chadwick,
Brougham, Place, and the other founders of the party
of philosophic radicalism. It was in this garden that
the old philosopher used to take his exercise, ambling
round the walks generally in the company of one of
his disciples, and, as he put it in his pedantic way,
" maximising recreation and minimising time."
Here the first years of Mr. and Mrs. Fowler's married
life were passed, and the place and the actual address
had a sentimental value in his eyes, which may appear
strange, but which, nevertheless, is entirely in keeping
with his character. Later the ancient landmarks of the
immediate neighbourhood were removed, and the enor-
mous block of Queen Anne's Mansions was built upon
the site. Sir John Fowler retained in the reconstructed
buildings an office which is still known as 2, Queen
Square Place. There is no number one, nor indeed any
other house in the " Place." There are other and better
known Queen Squares in London, and the address occa-
sionally was found misleading by hurried clients, who
arrived at times in a ruffled state of temper which
did not facilitate business. His partner, Sir B. Baker,
tried hard to bring about a change of name, and
at length one evening obtained his consent, but next
morning Fowler returned, and in a most pathetic
manner asked his younger partner to yield to what
he called the foible of an old man, and 2, Queen
Square Place the office remains to this day. The
addition of " Queen Anne's Mansions" to the firm's
address was accepted as a compromise.
To return to the year 1850. In one of the earliest
letters to his wife in the first year of their marriage he
MR HUDSON 119
gives a passing and not an unpleasing glimpse of a
notoriety who was much before the public at that time.
"I travelled alone," Mr. Fowler writes, "with the great
Mr. Hudson from London to Normanton and had a great deal
of conversation as to his troubles.
"He told me the greatest comfort he had when all the
world seemed against him was his wife, and he thought that
if he had not received that comfort it would have been too
much for him. I told him I was a very new married man,
but I could entirely feel the force of his observations. . . .
And now, my dear little wife, adieu, and may God bless you
with all the happiness your husband wishes you. I feel
already how essential you are to my happiness, and I am sure
before Thursday I shall be very impatient to be back again."
The career of Mr. Hudson, the Eailway King, ran
altogether apart from Mr. Fowler's work, but it is
characteristic of Fowler's good-natured tolerance for
a man who was both courted and condemned beyond
his merit, that in his numerous passages to the
Continent he used from time to time to seek out the
ex-Kailway King in his dingy retirement at Boulogne
and try to enliven his exile by a little friendly hos-
pitality. Mrs. Hudson, a blameless and exemplary lady,
lived to old age on Campden Hill, Kensington. Sir
John and Lady Fowler, then living at Thornwood Lodge,
and not forgetful perhaps of this little incident, were
glad to avail themselves of the privilege of neighbours,
and by various kindly attentions to show their
sympathy for misfortune borne with dignity and
resignation.
Of engineering matters his letters to his young bride
naturally say very little. A letter of October 29th,
1850, records a visit to New Holland, and mentions
" a most successful trial of our new crane." These
120 PKOFESSIONAL CHAEACTERISTICS
were hydraulic cranes, designed by Sir W. Armstrong,
and, we understand, were among the first mechanical
appliances of the kind used for the handling of goods
on railways, and we should have been glad to hear
more of them.
In January, 1851, he paid a visit to France, in
which Mrs. Fowler accompanied him, with regard to
the Douai and Rheims Railway, a project which came
to nothing. On December 2nd, 1851, he records the
coup d'etat of Louis Napoleon, with the comment,
" strong measures, but I believe necessary."
On June 1st, 1852, he writes to tell his wife that
overtures have been made to him by the people of
Dudley with a view to his representing them in
Parliament.
"I find a curious feeling at Dudley on the subject of the
election. I speak quite seriously when I tell you a very
influential party are anxious to get up a memorial to ask me
to be a candidate at the next election, if there is the slightest
prospect of my receiving it favourably, and certain parties in
the district who are friends of mine are to have a non-official
interview with me in a few days for the purpose. I understand
from various circumstances I should stand an excellent chance
of being returned, and free of expense. Of course I should
not do anything without consulting you. What say you ? "
Mrs. Fowler, who was better aware perhaps than
her husband himself of the great strain which the
pressure of his engagements made on his strength,
was strongly opposed to his adding parliamentary to
his professional work. A few paragraphs from the
correspondence between the husband and wife will
show how the matter was allowed to drop.
" I never, never could consent willingly," says Mrs. Fowler,
" to your undertaking a seat in Parliament. I should be very
PAKLIAMENT 121
unhappy if you were to do so. Do not be sanguine about it,
my darling, but rather throw cold water on it in your mind
and give it up at once.
" I cannot see that the advantage which it might be to you
is worth the consideration. Position you have, and you do not
want more. Time you have not to devote to it, and instead of
involving yourself in larger and greater engagements, let them
diminish and enjoy yourself more. Take more leisure and
pleasure, rather than confine yourself more by undertaking
such a responsibility. More I will not say till I see you,
which I hope will be to-morrow, when you will indeed have
a welcome."
In deference to his wife's wishes, Mr. Fowler took
no steps at this time to enter Parliament. Some
years later, in 1859, the project was raised again,
and Mrs. Fowler a second time urged the unwisdom
of such a step. His reply to her is as follows : —
"I appreciated all your letter very much excepting that
part which tells me you did not think you had the same
influence over me you formerly had. This is a great mistake,
and to prove it to be so I will undertake not to take any steps
to go into Parliament except with your approval.
"Keep this letter, and bring this forward against me if
I am disposed to take any steps against your wishes."
He seems about this period to have turned his
back on all thought of a parliamentary career, and,
in accordance with Mrs. Fowler's advice, to have
taken the first steps towards acquiring that Highland
home which was for so many years an abundant source
of pleasure to himself and his friends.
In 1857 he purchased the estate of Glen Mazeran,
near Tomatin, in Inverness -shire. On the 17th of
September of that year he writes to compliment his
father on a correct estimate of the letting value of
122 PKOFESSIONAL CHARACTEKISTICS
one of the farms on the estate, and describes his first
experiences as a Highland laird : —
"Yesterday I went out deer stalking on the upper part of
Glen Mazeran, leaving the lodge at six o'clock as the sun was
rising over the mountain, but as I rode up the glen the wood
was in shadow and was quite hard with frost, and the water on
the sides of the road was frozen nearly a quarter of an inch
thick. In some places on the higher ground, even for an hour
after the sun had risen, the ground was quite crusted over by
the frost, and cracked and split when trodden upon as in winter.
" At nine or ten o'clock, however, the sun became sufficiently
powerful to warm the earth and its inhabitants.
" I must tell you, for the information of Fred, that I found
two splendid stags, one with ten points which I could easily
have stalked, but they were a short distance over the march
and my conscientiousness prevailed and I refrained, notwith-
standing Eraser's deep disgust and strong remonstrances.
" I was rather sorry afterwards that I had been so very
good, for some people we had at lunch told me it was not the
habit to be very strict about marches with deer, and with
regard to the place where I saw the deer (near Cairn Gregor)
nobody was shooting the ground this year, and it belonged to
a trustee who is now in America. Glen Mazeran now has
always deer in it, since the sheep have been taken off, and
I daresay I shall get another stag before I leave, and if I do I
will write Fred a description. I wish he was with me now.
I want a companion who is not afraid of early rising, walking,
and working, when sport is to be had."
His professional engagements from 1850-1860 con-
tinued to hurry him hither and thither throughout
England, and occasionally to the Continent. A few
only of the most important of these can be mentioned.
The construction of the Oxford, Worcester, and Wolver-
hampton section of the Great Western Railway, the
London, Tilbury, and Southend Railway, in conjunction
HIS INDUSTRY 123
with Mr. Bidder, the Severn Valley Kailway, the Much
Wenlock and Coalbrookdale Railways and the Craven
Arms Railway, a system which included two fine cast
iron bridges over the Severn, the Edge ware, High gate,
and London Railway, the Alexandra Park extension,
and the Barnet extension, the Mid-Kent route, and the
Hammersmith and City Railway, from Paddington to
Hammersmith, belong to this period. This work was
varied with visits to Paris in October and to Lisbon
and Cintra in November of 1855. In May, 1856, he
visited Dunkirk in company with Mr. Brunei. In July
he delivered a report on the Chester Holyhead route.
In July and in December he was in Paris in con-
nection with the Algerian railways. In October he
reported on the Turkish railways, and in the same
and subsequent years he was much occupied with
the Nene Improvement Commission, and the reclama-
tion projects of the Norfolk Estuary proprietors.
The following extract from a letter to his wife
gives an idea of the rate and pressure at which he
worked. It is dated from Tavistock, March 31st,
1861 :—
" As I travelled to Exeter on Friday afternoon I tried to
work out a plan by which I could arrive at home by a train
which reaches Paddington to-morrow afternoon at six o'clock,
so that I might dine and spend the evening with you ; and
I found by making a start at daylight yesterday morning and
working industriously till late last night, and again starting at
daylight to-morrow morning I can accomplish it. So you may
expect me at Paddington at six o'clock, and I think you had
better dine at seven, arid invite Mr. Johnson and Mr. Baldry
to dine with us, and then I can comfortably transact all neces-
sary business with them and enable me to go to Ireland
without feeling anything neglected."
124 PROFESSIONAL CHARACTERISTICS
From 1856 onwards he was closely connected with the
development of Irish railways. He was the engineer of
the Great Northern and Western (of Ireland) Railway,
and visited Ireland yearly in connection with the busi-
ness of that and other lines of railway. A letter of
September 9th, 1856, describes his method of travel.
The party purchased a carriage, and attempted to
travel in comfort. There were difficulties at each
stage about horses, and the harness more hibernico
was, for the most part, a patchwork of rope, but the
weather was fine and the journey enjoyable. The
accommodation was primitive and often uncomfort-
able. He notes that their food — mutton, pork, roast
goose and pudding — was all put on the table at
once, and in none too cleanly a condition, and that
the solid wings of the goose found their way into
his feather bed. In later years the proverbial
hospitality of the Irish made his journeys more
comfortable, and he describes it as " lionising through
Ireland, staying at the best houses." It is indeed
characteristic of the man that comfort and discomfort
interfered very little with his thorough enjoyment of
life and work.
In this account of his first journey he describes
their arrival at the west coast, where, between West-
port and Castlebar, they met the chairman of the
line, Lord Lucan. Of the perennial Irish problem
Fowler says very little. Irish poverty is very poetical
and picturesque, and civilisation is hard and orderly,
and not readily adopted by the " finest peasantry in
the world," or indeed by any other proletariate class.
To Fowler the problem seemed simple enough, and
his remedy was briefly : " Let improving landlords
IEELAND 125
introduce better methods of cultivation, we must face
the suffering which this change will make. This will
be kindest in the end." The economy of western civil-
isation seemed indeed to him to be as axiomatic as the
rules of arithmetic. No plea of Celtic nationality had
in his eyes any relevance in abrogating the authority
of either the one or the other.
"Between Castlebar and Westport," he says, "we saw the
effect of a good deal of Lord Lucan's proceedings. Whole
villages completely removed and not a vestige remaining, and
fine fields with rich crops of grain and grass growing in their
place. It only needs a ride through this country to satisfy
anybody this is the true policy, and in the end, kindness to
the individual. Only conceive a miserable cabin, ten times
more so than the worst you ever saw in Scotland, and ten
times more filthy, inhabited by pigs and poultry, also with
a swarm of children, and the whole family supported out of a
rood, perhaps, of land. Why, of course, fever is hardly ever
absent, and starvation never, and the poor creatures are useless
to themselves and everybody else."
We need not dwell at length on his work in Ireland,
which continued for many years, unless it is to record
an event to which he himself attached considerable
importance — the capture of his first salmon.
"Yesterday morning I came down to Gal way at seven
o'clock with Mr. Eoberts (who was on his way to Athenry) to
try for a salmon on the river, and was fortunate enough to
hook the largest fish which had been caught for a fortnight,
and after fifty-five minutes of hard work I brought him safely
to land.
" I can quite understand now why people become so excited
about salmon fishing, and to see a 16 Ib. salmon, when it is
first brought out of the water, with colour exactly like hum-
ming-birds, and to feel you have conquered him, and done it
126 PROFESSIONAL CHARACTERISTICS
with a single gut — as the fisherman calls it — is like every other
success, very pleasant.
" There was quite an excitement on the river, and I was
pronounced a skilful fisherman."
His knowledge of Ireland and his well-established
reputation brought him, in 1867, the following flatter-
ing proposal from the Government :—
"MY DEAR SIK" (wrote to him the Chancellor of the
Exchequer, Mr. Disraeli, on August 17th of that year) —
"H.M.'s Government are anxious on the subject of Irish
railways. They have resolved to issue a Treasury Commission
to inquire completely into this subject. My opinion is that
it should be limited, and even very limited in number. I
should prefer three to a greater number of members : a first-
rate civil engineer, whose name would inspire confidence ; a
first-rate official financier ; and, if that be possible, a first-rate
railway manager.
" It will be a paid commission.
" I should be very happy if I could induce you to be a
commissioner, and I think it would be in my power to
associate with you a first-rate financier. I am quite at a
loss with regard to the character who should complete the
triumvirate. No doubt there are many first-rate managers
if abilities only were requisite for the duties I contemplate.
" Perhaps you might assist me with a suggestion ?
"The main duties of the commission will be to ascertain
the financial position of the Irish railways, to accomplish an
official verification of their accounts, the state of their lines,
their assets.
" I repeat my great desire that I may induce you to assist
the Government by undertaking this inquiry. No expense
shall be spared in securing for you all the subordinate aid
you may require. Let me hear from you at your convenience,
and believe me,
" Faithfully yours,
" B. DISRAELI."
COMMISSION ON IEISH EAILWAYS 127
To this Mr. Fowler replied : —
" I cannot but feel flattered by the selection of my name and
the manner in which you introduce the question to me, and
although I am much engaged with my professional duties, I feel
it proper to say that if you think I can be useful I will under-
take the duties you ask me to perform, but I am afraid I could
not make a commencement during the month of September.
" I think the constitution of the commission you propose
is more likely to work well than a much more numerous
one would be, but no doubt the chief difficulty will be the
selection of a railway manager.
"Of the men actively engaged upon the large railways,
I think Mr. Seymour Clarke, the general manager of the
Great Northern Eailway, would probably be the best, both
as respects general capacity, public confidence, and other
qualities, but it is possible you may feel a difficulty in asking
a gentleman who is attached to any particular system of
railway, and his company might possibly have a difficulty in
sparing him. On these points, however, Lord Colville, one
of the directors of the Great Northern Eailway, might be
safely and confidentially spoken to.
"Of the chairmen or other directors of railways having
practical knowledge of the working of lines, but not being
actual general managers, I am at a loss to make even one
confident suggestion, for so many of the prominent men have
lately brought themselves and their companies into trouble by
clever * financing ' that very few men are really left.
"In many respects, however, I think Mr. Moon, the chair-
man of the London and North Western Eailway, would be
a good selection. He is thoroughly acquainted with railway
management and its minutest details, and on the largest scale,
and the London and North Western Company has, without
doubt, been successfully established under his rule as the
best and safest railway property in England."
In the sequel, the gentlemen appointed by a Treasury
Minute, dated October 15th, 1867, to serve on this
128 PROFESSIONAL CHARACTERISTICS
commission were : Sir Alexander T. Spearman, Bart.,
John Mulholland, Esq., John Fowler, Esq., C.E.,
Seymour Clarke, Esq., Christopher Johnstone, and
W. Neilson Hancock, Esq., LL.D., Secretary.
The possibility of promoting the development of
Irish industry by different forms of State aid was then,
as now, engaging the earnest attention of statesmen.
The task imposed on Mr. Fowler and his colleagues was
not to pronounce an opinion on the economic wisdom
or otherwise of State ownership of railways, but to
collect and arrange certain details of information, and
inter alia to calculate the amount of loss which would
be sustained by the State, if it purchased the Irish
railways with a view of reducing the charges to such
a low level that an impoverished people like the Irish
should become as frequent travellers and users of rail-
ways as the Belgians.
The reply of the commissioners to this very hypo-
thetical conundrum is couched in very cautious terms.
The total share capital and borrowed money invested
in Irish railways was stated to be £27,527,286, and
for canals a sum of £902,918 must be added. In
their second report the commissioners estimate that
the annual loss to the Government if, after purchasing
the railways, it reduced the Irish rates to the Belgian
level, would be £655,265, or about 42 per cent,
of their receipts from passenger, goods, and live stock
traffic. The concluding paragraphs of the second
report point out that the circumstances of Belgium
and Ireland are not analogous. In Belgium the traffic
is chiefly connected with mining and ironworks. In
Ireland it is almost wholly of an agricultural character,
and the movements of a people engaged in that industry
IKISH KAILWAYS 129
are much more limited. The reduction of charges had
been a great success in Belgium as regards long-distance
traffic. The traffic of Ireland, however, " requires special
stimulus and development for short and moderate
distances, both for goods and passengers, as, except in
the case of tourists and people travelling for pleasure,
it is entirely of local character from town to town."
The commissioners therefore think that any reduction,
to be beneficial, must be on "long" and " short" traffic
equally.
They had no difficulty in coming to the conclusion
that a slight diminution in the charges for goods and
passengers would be simply a loss of so much money.
A large reduction was necessary to create an increase
of traffic. In passengers' fares they suggest a re-
duction of 31, 45, and 42 per cent, for first, second,
and third class passenger fares respectively ; a re-
duction of from 47 to 78 per cent, for different classes
of goods, and of 32 per cent, for cattle traffic. The
deficiency per annum resulting from such a revolution
of charges would be £525,701, or 30*45 per cent., after
allowing £120,000 per annum as the estimated re-
duction of expenditure in respect of interest and cost
of management.
In the judgment of the commissioners, after the
lapse of eleven years the receipts from the increased
traffic, called into being by this reduction of fares,
would suffice to pay working charges, interest on
borrowed money, and on capital advanced to meet
losses incurred during the eleven years of loss, and
would leave a balance in favour of the Exchequer.
If, as is frequently said, the rise and fall of railway
traffic is the best index of the country's industrial
K
130 PKOFESSIONAL CHAEACTEKISTICS
progress, this must seem a very simple way of bringing
material prosperity to Ireland. The commissioners,
however, do not commit themselves unreservedly to
this proposition, and add :—
"We do not feel it to be within the spirit of the instruc-
tions which we have received to speculate upon the degree of
material prosperity which would be given to Ireland by the
adoption of a great reduction of rates and charges, and a
concentration of management."
Arguing, however, from precedents which are, as the
commission points out, totally dissimilar, an increase of
traffic may be expected.
" These," the report concludes, " are vast results, and it must
be always remembered that calculations of this nature are
subject to disturbance from unusual or unexpected circum-
stances, but having obtained the best and most accurate
information in our power, and having brought our own
experience to bear upon the questions submitted to us, we
do not hesitate in giving our opinion that such results may
be fairly expected to follow the suggested reductions."
Everything connected with the economic history of
Ireland is deeply interesting. The Government, as we
know, took no action in the direction indicated by their
desire for information on this subject. The industrial
condition of Ireland, if not " unexpected," is certainly
"unusual." A mere reduction of railway charges to
a population which is not permeated by the industrial
instinct, the Government probably judged to be a vain
expedient.
To sum up the verdict of the commission, the
lowering of rate indicated would, according to pre-
cedents gathered in industrial communities, produce
IRISH KAILWAYS 131
the stated increase of traffic in the stated time. This
was the reply to the problem proposed to them.
Incidentally they hint that possibly Ireland is not
an industrial community, and that therefore their
calculations may be irrelevant.
The question of Irish railways continued to occupy
the attention of Government. In the beginning of
1872 we find that Mr. Fowler was engaged in
negotiations with certain eminent financiers for an
amalgamation of Irish railways. The conditions on
which, in his judgment, negotiations might proceed
are summarised as follows in a memorandum drawn
up by him about this time : All Irish railways to be
purchased ; the Government to find four- fifths of the
purchase money at 3J per cent. ; the proposed
company the remainder. The company to provide at
least £5,000,000 of unguaranteed capital; a reduction
of 10 per cent, in railway rates; all rolling stock to
be made and repaired in Ireland ; Irish representatives
to be on the Board of the company.
The Government, he states, was very anxious about
the matter, and would, he believed, be propitious to
any suggested plan which should include Government
aid without financial risk or the necessity of Govern-
ment management.
" The Irish railway problem " (so the impossibility of
a cheap railway system among a population whose in-
dustrial capacities are undeveloped is euphemistically
termed) was not to be solved in this way. It is of
course impossible for a Government to buy up a
struggling industry and to reduce its tariff without
incurring both risk and responsibility.
It is worth noticing that many years earlier, viz. in
132 PROFESSIONAL CHARACTERISTICS
1847, Lord George Bentinck had made a somewhat
similar proposal. In what his biographer has termed
the best speech he ever made, he urged that the
Government should advance £16,000,000, to which
£8,000,000 of share capital should be added, for the
extension of railway enterprise in Ireland. An in-
teresting account of Lord George Bentinck's proposal
will be found in Lord Beaconsfield's life of that states-
man. Its revival, when the biographer had become the
leader of the House of Commons and Chancellor of the
Exchequer, is probably more than a coincidence.
This anticipation of events is, we hope, justified
with a view of bringing into one continuous record
Sir John's connection with Ireland. To return to
the earlier period, we find in 1857 the first entries
referring to the Victoria Station and Pimlico Eailway
Company, as it was called, a scheme which was to
make Sir John Fowler responsible for one of the most
important exits from London, namely, the Pimlico
Kail way Bridge and Victoria Station. This bridge was
the first railway bridge over the Thames in London,
and (we are fortunately able to append an illustration)
it is still the handsomest. This encomium, the cynic
will say, does not convey high praise ; but a review
of the London railway bridges will make us wish
that Sir John Fowler had been responsible for more
of them.
One other expedition of considerable importance was
undertaken by him at this time. In 1857 he made a
prolonged stay in Algiers with the purpose of con-
structing a system of railways there. He had inter-
views with the Emperor Napoleon and his ministers,
and made great progress in his survey. The work
OTHER WORKS 133
was finally, by arrangement, given over to French
engineers, and the line was not constructed by Fowler
and his English assistants. During his absence he
wrote long and detailed letters, descriptive of the
country and scenery, to his wife. The letters are
remarkable letters, both in respect of the historical
information they contain and the description and
shrewd comment which they make on the country
and the people ; but they are reticent as to business,
and though they suggest to us that Sir John Fowler,
if he had given himself time, might have written
admirable volumes of history and travel, they are
only the record of an uneventful business journey,
and contain nothing that is of interest to the general
reader.
CHAPTER V.
THE NENE IMPROVEMENT AND NORFOLK ESTUARY
FOWLER'S work, however, was not confined to
railway construction. Hydraulic engineering, from
his early training, always had a special fascination for
him.
His connection with the Nene Improvement and the
Norfolk Estuary reclamation scheme brought him into
relation with what may well be termed a perennial and
classical problem of English engineering.
The history of the drainage of the Fens dates from
Roman times, but its more modern phase began when
Charles I. employed Vermuyden on engineering work
in this region. Since then the restless and ever
varying action of the waters and the sediment which
they contain have taxed, generation after generation,
the skill and patience of a succession of great English
engineers. Sir John Rennie, in a speech delivered on
the subject at the Institution, enumerates the great
names of those who had given attention to the
problem-- Vermuyden, Westerdyke, Kinderley, Arm-
strong, Labelye, Golborne, Watte, Elstob, Smeaton,
Mylne, Page, Huddart, the elder Rennie, Robert
Stephenson, and, in due succession of time, and on a
subdivision of the great question, John Fowler.
134
THE FENS 135
The general nature of the problem is well stated
by Walker and Craddock in their History of Wisbech
and the Fens, 1849.
" The Fens are a large basin which, but for drainage, would
be generally a standing pool formed by the washings of the
high borderlands. The great reservoir into which they dis-
charge their contents is filled with sediment, which every wind
and tide throws into the mouths of its rivers. If the Fens
were of greater elevation, the force which these elevations
would give the fresh waters falling into their outfall would
effectually cleanse whatever the tide and tempests might
deposit, and — as in the Ehone, which brings vast quantities
of earthy materials from its mountains — drive the suspended
matter forward till it subsided in deep water. But the Fen
rivers are placed in such peculiar relation to the sea — their
force is so nearly balanced by the sea force — that they have
no energy to push forward, but become passive and clogged
up unless art brings in its aid to assist them.
" In these circumstances, whatever force can be imparted
to the Fen waters requires to be economised and used as
effectually as possible. It is clear that the rivers which have
the greatest quantity of fresh waters to scour them have the
greatest chance of keeping their channels open, provided these
channels are restricted against weakening themselves with
breadth. It is, then, an exceeding waste of impoverished
means to send the fresh waters of these regions to sea in
three or four separate streams, instead of combining them
into one stream and driving them into their receptacle in a
firm, united body. That this was the original method of
nature seems pretty evident from the history of the Great
Ouse, which . . . discharged itself originally by Wisbech,
carrying with it the waters of the Nene, and even part of
those now discharged by the Welland. Engineers have not
been entirely blind to this fact, but the extent of the work
and the adverse interests it would involve have made them
shrink from any work which might be considered perfect."
136 THE NENE IMPKOVEMENT
As early as 1720 operations with regard to the Nene
outfall were commenced by Charles Kinderley, but
owing to local opposition Kinderley 's Cut was not
finally complete till more than half a century later,
i.e. 1775. Though an experiment on too limited a
scale, it successfully established the principle that the
chief obstruction to the discharge of the waters lay at
the outfall.
In 1814 Mr. John Kennie was called in to advise.
His recommendation involved a new channel " from
the mouth of Kinderley 's Cut to the level of low water
in the bay," and other works for deepening the course
of the Nene. Opposition due to financial reasons and
to local feeling delayed any action till March 1826,
when the North Level Commissioners undertook to
carry out the necessary works "on receiving reason-
able contributions from all the other parties to these
measures. "
Further works were authorised in 1830. The
general effect of the opening of the Nene Outfall
was most satisfactory. The scour of the river through
the town of Wisbech added 10 to 12 feet to its depth
and saved the town the expense of some £50,000, the
amount estimated by Kennie in 1814 as required for
deepening the river by manual labour.
Further important works in 1849 were carried out
by Kennie and Stephenson.
The task which Fowler was called on to undertake
in December, 1856, was the up-keep and improvement
of this system of drainage. In a report addressed to
the Commissioners of the Nene Valley Drainage and
Navigation, Mr. Fowler pointed out that some of their
works were in a dangerous condition owing to the
OPEKATIONS AT WISBECH 137
excessive scour of the water in some parts of the
channel and to excessive silting up in others.
A Bill authorising the raising of fresh funds had been
rejected, and the commission was placed in a position of
some difficulty. The engineer states, however, that as
a temporary expedient he had placed across the river
in the town of Wisbech, a contraction by means of
a submerged weir and self-acting gates. This he had
hoped to remove, when permanent alteration had been
made, but he felt now obliged to fall back on the
expedients authorised by their existing Act. The
report, which is of great length, deals principally with
matters of detail and contains a criticism of various
proposals advanced in the interests of the different
parties concerned in the drainage and navigation.
These works, notably the temporary construction at
Wisbech, caused great inconvenience to some, and the
engineer emphasises the statement that the difficulty
to be faced is not so much one of engineering as of
reconciling a number of conflicting interests. The
problem, in fact, was one to be solved by a de-
velopment of jurisprudence as an antecedent to the
operations of the engineer.
The Institution of Civil Engineers devoted more
than one evening to the discussion of a paper on
arterial drainage and outfalls, read by Mr. R. B.
Grantham on November 29th, 1859.
The following is a resume of Mr. Fowler's speech
on that occasion. It may be mentioned that his
intervention in the debates of the institution is very
infrequent. He dwells, as is characteristic of his habit
of mind, on the importance of detail and material,
and on the danger, in engineering problems, of making
138 THE NENE IMPKOVEMENT
hasty generalisations. Fowler's objection to generalisa-
tion is not that of the ignorant empiric, but of the man
of experience, who knows the difficulty of apprehending
all the factors of the problem about which generalisa-
tion has to be attempted. Without generalisation,
science is impossible, but in applied science the factors
of the problem are often so numerous and so com-
plicated that generalisation may easily cease to be
correct generalisation, and may fail, because it attempts
to include, in identical propositions, facts and forces
that are not homogeneous and which therefore require
different formulae for their explanation.
Fowler began by expressing his doubt as to the
advantage of a commission with compulsory powers
—the obstructiveness of private owners was a great
evil, but possibly a commission might be a greater
evil. He feared that a commission would not be
competent from a professional point of view, and it
might inaugurate works of a disastrous character on
a large scale owing to the presence of some one member
of great authority but no technical knowledge.
The remarks must be taken as a defence of the Nene
Commission, which had no large compulsory powers.
With regard to arterial drainage he would, he said, " attempt
to give direction to the discussion. The Ancholme drainage
was a case where the outfall was not dependent upon the
discharge of the water from the level itself. The Witham
was a case where it was so dependent, but where the tide was
shut out. The Ouse and the Nene were cases in which the
outfall was dependent upon the discharge of the water from
the level, but the tide was admitted. The Ancholme drainage
. . . was one in which the tide was not admitted at all. The
tidal current of the estuary of the Humber swept past its
sluice entrance and kept it free, and it was not dependent upon
SPEECH AT THE INSTITUTION 139
the discharge of water from the land. The Ancholme was
a combination of drainage and navigation with catch-water
drains. The drainage was perfect as far as freedom from
inundation was concerned, while the means of irrigation was
afforded by the catch- water drains : and it combined better
than at most other places drainage and navigation.
"Other cases of the kind had been treated upon the plan
of Vermuyden, who, having a great dislike for tidal water,
excluded it wherever it was practicable ; and in some cases he
was right. To the Witham, Vermuyden's principle was applied
of shutting out the tide above Boston ; but in that case it was
wrong, because the outfall was dependent upon the mode in
which the water was discharged, and consequently the naviga-
tion had been imperfect ever since. At Boston there was a
large expanse of low land, over which the water struggled
to get into the deep water of the Wash ; the outfall, therefore,
was dependent upon the way in which it was discharged. If
the water was permitted to go up by the Witham in the same
way as by the Ouse and the Nene, the Witham would be in a
very different condition to that in which it was at present.
The Ouse and the Nene might be termed open rivers, the
Nene perfectly so, and the Ouse up to Denver sluice.
"The Nene was a river which had been really benefited
by the alterations already effected. The outfall was very good,
and all that was now wanted was to carry out improvements
up the river ; and by removing obstructions and properly
attending to the banks, it would become a fine river. The
Ouse was of a similar character to the Nene, and had fairly
repaid all the care bestowed on it. Every improvement has
been of great value both to navigation and drainage. Sir John
Eennie had described the large amount of drainage that had
been carried out in that district : Mr. Fowler, however, did not
think that 13 feet had been gained at Lynn. (Sir J. Eennie
later in the debate re-affirmed his statement, while Mr.
Bidder, V.P., questioned Kennie's statement and supported
Fowler.) Still, at the present time the Ouse below and above
Lynn was a complete river. The cut obtained by Sir J. Eennie
140 THE NENE IMPROVEMENT
and the late Mr. Stephenson was certainly one of the finest
engineering works in the country. The cut was two miles in
length and from 600 to 700 feet in width, and a more success-
ful result had never been obtained.
"He thought there was no branch of engineering science
which required more care than such cases as these. The
material was easily acted on by the scour, and even if cut
originally in straight lines, it was easily distorted and turned
into irregular forms. That required to be corrected, and it was
the province of the engineer to decide upon the materials that
should be used to protect the slope of the cut, upon the form
to be given to the slope, and upon the means of maintaining
the improvements at the smallest expense. The first depth
obtained was seldom so much as was subsequently arrived at.
These improvements were obtained at the risk of damage to
the banks; as the depths increased, the banks must be pro-
tected, and constant watchfulness was necessary to carry them
out with safety. In this respect it was impossible to lay down
any general principle. The engineer must consider each case
separately as it occurred to him, but as a rule a formation of
rubble stone at the foot of the slope was a good system for
directing the general current, and the upper part of the slope
was kept in order with less difficulty. A minor improvement
had been lately introduced into the works of the Norfolk
Estuary by creosoting the stakes, and it was believed that this
small additional expense was attended with advantage. He
expressed his entire concurrence with the remark of Sir John
Eennie, that it was impossible to lay down any general
principle as applicable to all conditions and circumstances.
The conditions of every case must be carefully and separately
considered, and he specially cautioned engineers against the
adoption of Vermuyden, of an inflexible principle in all cases."
Fowler's connection with the Nene Improvement
Scheme was, even more than his railway work, a con-
tinuation of the labour of earlier engineers. As we
have already pointed out, perhaps the most important
THE NOEFOLK ESTUAKY 141
effects of the work of Fowler and his compeers in
connection with railway communications are the in-
direct economic results which, though each in itself
small, yet cumulatively amount to a great revolution.
So here, too, in addition to the question of arterial
drainage and navigation, and the reclamation of land,
the drainage of the Fens brings to light important
principles of economic progress.
The connection between the solution of engineering
problems and the development of the jurisprudence
of a civilised and progressive society is aptly illustrated
in the experience of the association known as the
Proprietors of the Norfolk Estuary, of which Sir John
Kennie and Mr. Fowler were the engineers. The tract
of swamp dealt with lay between the Nene Outfall and
the town of Lynn, and extended along the Wash, past
what are now the Sandringham estates of the Prince
of Wales. The inception of such work requires first
a clear definition of proprietary rights in respect of
the area to be treated, and then some reconciliation
of the conflicting interests of the various proprietors.
The following quotation from the engineers' report to
the proprietors for the year 1858 shows the method
followed in this instance:—
" During the past season the works of the Babingley enclosure,
recommended in our last report, have been completed, and about
550 acres of valuable land have been recovered from the sea.
"The value of the land was settled by arbitration before
being enclosed in the manner provided for by clauses in your
Act, and the increased value by reason of the enclosure is
now being settled in a like manner. When this has been
ascertained, the difference between the two amounts will repre-
sent the improved value of the land, and the Norfolk Estuary
142 THE NENE IMPKOVEMENT
Company will then receive one-third of it from the present
proprietors, whose further rights as frontagers will thereby be
extinguished, and in future all enclosures carried further
seaward will be the sole property of the Norfolk Estuary
Company."
Partly by aid of an Act of Parliament and partly
by voluntary agreement, the proprietary rights in this
derelict waste were defined. Without this security of
tenure nothing could be done. This granted, contract
and industry became possible, and in the present case
the landlord on the existing foreshore paid to the
adventurers one-third of the improved value of his
reclaimed land and ceded to the adventurers all claim
to further reclamations seawards. The engineering
operations consisted of making a number of embank-
ments generally in the form of wattled groins which
afforded protection to land which was in danger from
the scour of the tide, and which at the same time
promoted an area of still water where the silt was so
deposited as in time to render the area fit for enclosure.
The process is known as " warping," and it is interest-
ing to note that the visible sign that the land so
reclaimed is becoming fit for enclosure, is the spread
of the growth of the samphire plant. In the maps and
plans of the reports the range of the samphire plant is
carefully indicated.
We are tempted to add a further illustration estab-
lishing the converse proposition, namely, that the
uncertainty of tenure which ensues in default of
individual appropriation retards the beneficent action
of the engineer and the agriculturalist.
The reward given to the original adventurers who
drained the Bedford Level was certain farms which
GKUNTY FEN 143
they redeemed from the swamp. Ownership, security
of separate tenure, improved agriculture, and the main-
tenance of a sound system of drainage went together.
That part of the Fen which remained intercommon-
able — in other words, that which was every man's or
no man's land — remained still a stagnant waste.
The particular piece of land which we have in view
was an area ' * intercommonable of seven parishes"
situate in the union of Ely, and bearing the unromantic
title of Grunty Fen. A part of it was drained by the
Earl of Bedford and his associates of the Bedford
Level Corporation and reclaimed for the service of man.
As time went on, however, the unreclaimed portion of
Grunty Fen ceased to possess even the amenities, such
as they are, of a good swamp. The drainage all round
it rendered even the life of the pike precarious, and
gave no safe breeding-ground for the wild duck. There
was swamp enough left to give foot-rot to the sheep
and establish ague in the shepherd's hut. The Fen
was covered with ant-hills and thistles. Stray gunners
poached at large after snipe. No one seemed to know
who had legal rights on the Fen ; everyone did what
was right in his own eyes — dug it for sods, and even
carried away the soil to the adjoining lands. A neigh-
bouring owner, and, as such, possessed of commonable
rights, describes how he set about abolishing this
nuisance. " I ferreted about," he says, "in the Kecords
of the Court of Exchequer and in the Petty Bag Office
and ascertained what was the history of the other Fens
before they were enclosed." As a result the proper
procedure was ascertained, and a scheme for a pro rat a
allotment secured the requisite number of assents and
an Act was obtained in 1861 for enclosure. The
144 THE NENE IMPKOVEMENT
interests of those who had rights in respect of the
Fen were adjusted by a valuer, lots were laid out,
roads and watercourses were made, and the recovered
acres were given over to separate ownership and cul-
tivation. Something like £11,000 was expended in
the process mainly for drains and dykes and inde-
pendent watercourses and outfall works.
" The crowning evidence of modern civilisation," says
Mr. Pell in his most interesting pamphlet (The Making
of the Land of England. Murray, 1899), from which
the foregoing particulars are taken, "is seen in a
railway bisecting the Fen with two stations on it,
bringing London within a two-and-a-quarter hours'
run." The story, which should be read at length in
Mr. Pell's pamphlet, is indeed an epitome of the history
of civilisation. It assigns with much precision the part
that is played both by the juridical reformer and by
the engineer.
The granting of a title to land in the hitherto dere-
lict Grunty Fen enabled the adventurers to drain a
portion of it. The advantages of secure ownership and
the disadvantage of community of tenure being, in
process of time, made apparent, steps were taken to
end the ownerless condition of the remainder of the
fen. The land at length was given over to separate
ownership. This security encouraged industry, and
industry availed itself of engineering science, and
civilisation advanced. All this, gathered from the
microcosm of Grunty Fen, from the Norfolk Estuary
Association, and from the labour of its engineer, John
Fowler, must be weighed and considered if we would
frame aright the panegyric of the engineering pro-
fession.
CHAPTEK VI.
METROPOLITAN RAILWAY
WE now come to what was probably the most ex-
tensive enterprise which Fowler carried through
single-handed — the making of the Metropolitan Kail-
way. The attention of the public is periodically directed
to the growth of London traffic and the need of im-
proved communications; and about the year 1853 the
subject was being a good deal discussed. It occurred,
of course, to many that some portion of the traffic
might be carried underground, but it required great
intrepidity on the part of a responsible engineer to
undertake the making of such a line. Fowler, how-
ever, was nothing if not self-confident, and in 1853
we find him acting as engineer for the promoters of
an experiment in this direction, and some description
of this must now be attempted.
In 1834 there were steam carriages worked by steam
power between Paddington (which twenty years before
was described as a village four miles from London) and
Moorgate, following very much the route of the present
underground railway, but running on the surface.
After another interval of twenty years an Act of
Parliament was procured for the " North Metropolitan
Eailway ; Paddington to the Post Office ; Extensions
to Paddington and the Great Western Eailway, the
L 145
146 METROPOLITAN KAILWAY
General Post Office, the London and North Western
Railway, and the Great Northern Railway. John
Fowler, Engineer ; John Hargrave Stevens, Architect."
This Act of Parliament may be described as the first
definite step towards the construction of underground
Metropolitan railways, though the first portion of the
then projected railway was not opened till thirty years
later.
Apart from the question of facilitating the con-
veyance of passengers from one part of London to
another, as early as 1845 the great railways were
beginning to realise how important it was for them
to have their stations as close as possible to their
sources of traffic. Accordingly no less than nineteen
bills were deposited in that session for lines within the
Metropolitan area. A Royal Commission was appointed
to inquire into the matter. Many projects were then
put forward. Mr. Vignoles had a scheme for a Charing
Cross to Cannon Street Railway. Messrs. Stephenson
and Bidder were for extending the South Eastern to
Waterloo Bridge. Mr. Locke suggested an extension
of the London and South Western to London Bridge,
and Mr. Page a line from the Great Western through
Kensington to Westminster and along a proposed
Thames Embankment to East Cheap and Blackwall.
There was also a North London Railway and a Regent's
Canal Railway. Mr. Charles Pearson, the City
solicitor, was in favour of having a Great Central
Terminus at Farringdon Street with a connecting line
to King's Cross.
" Mr. Pearson," says the report of the commissioners,
" would carry the line of railway between two rows of houses
which he proposes to build so as to form a spacious and
EARLIER PROPOSALS 147
handsome street, 80 feet in width and 8,506 feet in length ;
the railway to be on the basement level and to be arched
over so as to support the pavement of the street, which would
be on the level of the ground-floor of the houses. Mr. Pearson
proposed to give light and air to the railway by openings in
the carriage-way and footpath."
Mr. Pearson, says Sir Benjamin Baker, from whose
paper on ''Metropolitan Kail ways" the information
here given has been mainly compiled, "is clearly
entitled to the credit of being the originator of the
whole tribe of Arcade Kailways." He was even the
first to suggest "blow-holes," a subject which has
occasioned much heartburning in subsequent years to
the authorities charged with the maintenance of the
public streets. In bearing testimony to the value of
Mr. Pearson's services to the cause of Metropolitan
communications, Mr. Fowler^ remarked that his view
was vitiated by the assumption that the public con-
venience required the concentration of railways in one
central station, adding that if a man of the ability of
Mr. Pearson had lived to see the great development
of railway travelling, he would have abandoned his
advocacy of concentration.
The Commission of 1846 was not, as Sir Benjamin
Baker remarks, very far-seeing. They objected to
the carrying of railway bridges across the river, as
likely to create an obstruction to navigation ; and
none of the existing bridges could be given over to
railway traffic without inconvenience to the public.
They calculated that the average distance travelled by
passengers arriving at the Euston terminus was 64
miles, and argued that the saving of another mile or
* Minutes of Proceedings of the Institute of Civil Engineers, vol. 81, p. G8.
148 METROPOLITAN EAILWAY
two was of very little importance. The time was
clearly not yet ripe for a Metropolitan system of
railways.
Mr. Pearson, however, was not daunted, and con-
tinued, with his colleague Mr. Stevens, architect and
surveyor to the western division of the City, to advo-
cate various projects — for a City terminus line, for
arcades, for vegetable and meat markets, and for
Holborn Valley Viaducts. Finally, in 1853, an Act
was obtained for a line of 2^ miles, from Edgware
Eoad to Battle Bridge, King's Cross. To this line
Mr. Fowler was the engineer, Mr. Stevens the architect,
and Mr. Burchell the solicitor. Plans were at once
prepared for extensions both westwards to Paddington
and eastwards to the City. The line authorised in 1853
was entirely under the public roadway, and it was not
necessary to acquire any buildings, but the extensions
were more ambitious, and it was proposed to tunnel
under buildings and to acquire certain private property.
In 1854 the Great Western Eailway joined the pro-
moters, and offered to contribute £175,000 of capital
if the line from Paddington to the Post Office could
be sanctioned. There was a severe parliamentary
contest. Mr. Fowler was supported by Messrs. Brunei,
Hawkshaw, Scott Eussell, Peacock, and Stevens, and
was opposed by many equally distinguished engineers.
A great variety of objections were put forward. The
tunnels could not be ventilated, the rails would be so
greasy that no locomotive would be able to drag a
train. This last objection was put forward by no less
distinguished an authority than Mr. Locke, a great
engineer, whom his countrymen have justly honoured
with a resting-place in Westminster Abbey.
METROPOLITAN COMMUNICATIONS 149
The approval of the Post Office authorities was at the
time deemed of great importance. Sir Eowland Hill
wrote to the chairman of the railway company :—
"The Postmaster -General thinks it necessary that such
arrangements should be made as will admit of the intended
railway being brought into the basement of the building, so
that bags, when made up, may be placed at once in the
railway carriages"; and this was part of the original scheme.
In 1855 a Select Committee of the House of
Commons on Metropolitan communications was ap-
pointed, and Mr. Fowler appeared to give evidence
as to " exact position of the Metropolitan Kail way,
for which an Act of Parliament has been obtained."
The actual course followed by the Metropolitan Kail-
way system has deviated so largely from the original
design that it will be interesting to set down Mr.
Fowler's evidence on this point :—
"In the session of 1853 a part of that scheme was
sanctioned from near the Edgware Koad to King's Cross, a
distance of two miles, with a capital of £300,000. That
was avowedly an imperfect scheme, and the intention was
expressed of coming forward in the next session and com-
pleting it so far as to join the northern railways with each
other and with the Post Office. That was done last session.
The scheme of last session was to join the Paddington station
by two lines — one for passengers and one for goods — in con-
nection with the Great Western Company, who are share-
holders in it, and to join the London and North Western at
Euston Square, and the Great Northern at King's Cross,
taking the line down to the Post Office, and there terminating
in such a manner as shall communicate conveniently with the
Post Office vaults, where the letters could be put into the vans.
That was done in conjunction with the Post Office authorities,
and with their entire sanction. The total length of that
150 METROPOLITAN RAILWAY
scheme, including the part sanctioned in 1853, is 4f miles,
and the capital is £1,000,000. The works have not yet been
commenced, owing to the war and the depressed state of the
money market, and the determination of the directors not
to proceed till the whole of the shares had been taken up.
Every share has now been taken up, and the works are about
to commence."
Such was the scheme as sanctioned by Parliament at
that date. Mr. Fowler goes on to explain a further
extension, " which will complete the communications
with the Southern and Eastern Eailways, both with
each other and with the Post Office." The line was
to communicate with the Eastern Counties Kailway,
with the Brighton, and the South Eastern, and to
cross the river by means of a bridge. The addition in
question was to amount to 3| miles. From the Post
Office it was to run underground to near Old Fish
Street, then to pass over Thames Street, and so over
the river, and, by means of " a viaduct of ordinary
construction," to join the South Western on one side
and the London and Brighton on the other.
The extension to the Eastern Counties Kailway was
to be entirely underground, with a station at Moorgate
Street in its course. This was an extension which the
Eastern Counties authorities were anxious to secure,
as they were dissatisfied with their existing station
accommodation.
Opposite the Great Western Eailway Hotel there was
to be a passenger station, communicating by an under-
ground passage with the "new" passenger station on
the Great Western Kailway.
There was also to be a " branch line," parallel to the
Grand Junction Canal, for goods alone, and this was to
ME. FOWLER'S EVIDENCE 151
be so laid out that a through train could pass along it
quite conveniently. It was further in contemplation to
make a similar goods connection with the London and
North Western and with the Great Northern, " so that
coal trains and goods trains can come along the Great
Northern, and, by means of the North London, along
the London and North Western to any part of the
City, which the Metropolitan line will communicate
with." This arrangement, it was pointed out to the
witness, as at the moment authorised, unduly favoured
the Great Western Kail way. "It must be evident to
you, Mr. Fowler," said the chairman, "that if this rail-
way, which is to communicate with the north and south
sides of the Metropolis, is ever sanctioned, it must be
sanctioned upon the principle of giving to every rail-
way company in the Metropolis the privilege of using
it." Mr. Fowler's reply is characteristic of his method
of meeting an objection. He adopts most enthusi-
astically the suggestion propounded by the adversary,
and goes on to show how entirely it is met by the
scheme which he is advocating.
It would have been a lengthy process to explain
in answer to this question, as he does elsewhere, that
"it is no part of their scheme to bring all the railways
to one common centre. They do not believe that such
a thing would be convenient, and therefore they have
along the course of the line intermediate stations at
convenient places " — convenient, that is, to the Metro-
politan stations of the great lines. Mr. Fowler was
all along of opinion that the Metropolitan Kailway
would be a passenger railway, and that its traffic would
be of the "omnibus" character. This question about
affording equal facilities for goods traffic to all the
152 METROPOLITAN RAILWAY
great railway companies was therefore of comparatively
little importance, but it obviously took important rank
in the mind of the chairman. The answer given is
quite truthful and diplomatic. It agrees that equal
facilities must be given, and " we are quite prepared
to carry it out on that principle, so much so that I
have considered the details of doing it, and it can be
done quite conveniently." The question, however,
really was whether the various companies would think
the accommodation offered worth the expense which it
would involve.
"The communications," Mr. Fowler added, "connecting the
different railways can only be carried out in conjunction with
those railways. The parties interested in the London Bridge
Station and the South Western, as well as the great northern
companies, must themselves feel the value of this communica-
tion, and must be active parties in co-operating to carry it
out, in order to enable it to be done with prudence and
success."
The conclusion of the committee is worth quoting :—
"On the preliminary point of their inquiry, your com-
mittee find that the requirements of the existing traffic of
the Metropolis far exceed the facilities provided for it; that
the rapid increase of that traffic is constantly adding to the
amount of inconvenience and loss thus caused ; that enormous
as the increase has been, it is, and must continue to be, kept
seriously in check by the want of means for its natural
expansion; and that it has become indispensable to make
provision in this respect for the future on a great and
comprehensive scale, and with the least possible delay. In
order that the House may the better appreciate the grounds
on which your committee rest these convictions, the following
facts, adduced in evidence by Mr. Charles Pearson, may be
cited.
THE COMMITTEE'S REPORT 153
"The population of the Metropolitan District, which in
1811 was 1,138,000, by the census of 1851 was 2,362,000, thus
showing that it has doubled in forty years. Your committee
find that about 200,000 persons enter the City each day on
foot by different avenues, and about 15,000 by the river
steamers ; and that besides the cab, cart, carriage, and waggon
traffic of the streets, the omnibuses alone perform an aggre-
gate of 7,400 journeys through the City. The number of
passengers arriving at and departing from the London Bridge
group of railway termini which in 1850 amounted to 5,558,000,
had, in 1854, risen to 10,845,000. At the South Western
Railway it appears that during the same period the numbers
have increased from 1,228,000 to 3,308,000. The number
arriving at and departing from the Shoreditch Station last year
is stated at 2,143,000; Euston Square Station, 970,000;
Paddington Station, 1,400,000 ; King's Cross Station, 711,000 ;
the Blackwall Station in Fenchurch Street, 8,144,000. These
figures serve to convey some idea of the rate at which the
traffic of the Metropolis is increasing, and that increase,
the House will bear in mind, takes place, notwithstanding
the obstructions presented by the existing means of com-
munication. Looking at the overcrowded state of the
principal thoroughfares of a capital which, as has been shown,
has doubled its population within the last forty years, and
which there is every reason to believe is annually accelerating
the ratio of its growth, your committee have arrived at the
following conclusions. . . ."
The committee then sets out eight recommendations.
The most important are to this effect : —
(3) That the different Metropolitan railway termini should
be connected by railway with each other, with the docks, the
river, the Post Office, so as to accelerate the mails, and take all
through traffic, not only of passengers, but, in a still more
important degree, of goods off the streets.
(4) That all existing restrictions upon the natural and
convenient flow of traffic, such, for example, as tolls on the
154 METROPOLITAN RAILWAY
roads and bridges within the Metropolitan district, should, as a
general rule, be removed.
(5) That wherever, as, for example, in the case of the
Metropolitan Railway, works for improving the communication
of the Metropolis can be carried out by private enterprise, that
course should be adopted, and your committee consider that
most important results may be secured in this way.
(6) That when the improvements contemplated partake
more of the character of a public benefit than of a commercial
speculation, care be taken by such means as economising the
waste spaces of the river, or opening new streets through poor
neighbourhoods, to diminish the cost of the undertaking to the
lowest possible point.
(7) Contains a recommendation for combining railway ex-
tensions with street improvements.
(8) That all the cost of public improvements required by
the existing or prospective demands of Metropolitan traffic,
whether in forming new streets, or enlarging existing ones, or
in purchasing or building bridges, or removing toll-bars, should
be defrayed by a local rate levied on the whole Metropolitan
area.
The question of Metropolitan communications is,
perhaps, as pressing to-day as it was forty years ago.
The railways constructed by Sir John Fowler and his
fellow-engineers have done much to relieve the con-
gestion, but the economical difficulties which they
partially overcame still remain, some of them, indeed,
in an aggravated form. Towards private enterprise
in the form of Metropolitan railways the committee
adopts an attitude of benevolent neutrality. For foot-
passengers and horse traffic the public authority should
tax all the ratepayers, but there is no suggestion that
the public authority should provide any sort of facility
for station and line accommodation for the great
modern convenience of railway travelling. It does not
THE STATE AND KAILWAYS 155
suggest, however, that this beneficent form of effort
should be thwarted. This neutral, if not benevolent,
attitude of the commission of 1855 has by no means
been imitated. The whole system of imposing local
rates on railways, their exclusion from any right of
representation on local spending authorities, the
passenger duty, the attempt to impose onerous con-
ditions, in the way of rebuilding and workmen's trains,
on the occasion of every application to the public
authority, and, indeed, the whole attitude of Parlia-
ment to those public improvements which are carried
out by private enterprise and " commercial speculation "
seem to suggest that railways are a public scourge
rather than a public convenience. Unfortunately for
progress, the number of persons who are willing to
deprive themselves and their neighbours of a great
convenience, because someone may derive a commercial
profit from its use, is largely on the increase. The
result, of course, is to throw more and more into the
hands of municipalism, that most important body of
industrial enterprise which is obliged to invoke the
aid of parliamentary powers for its inception. The
suburban and metropolitan railway traffic of London
is a monument of what private enterprise can do in
spite of the opposition of popular misconception.
The ability of municipalism to conduct large enter-
prises may some day be proved. In the meantime
its aggressive attitude has only succeeded in paralysing
and obstructing private enterprise in such industries
as housebuilding for the poorer class, the making of
tramways, the extension of railway accommodation, the
generation of cheap electrical power, telephones, and
similar conveniences. Its ability to sustain by its own
156 METROPOLITAN RAILWAY
initiative the advance of economic improvement and to
ensure the adoption of scientific invention for the
benefit of mankind, which hitherto has been effected
by private enterprise, is by no means apparent. Its
period of usurpation is, however, too recent to enable
men to see clearly what use it will make of the power
which it has assumed.
This feeling of jealousy (ill- warranted as we believe
it to be) against private enterprise working under
compulsory powers is new. It has been the out-
come of the comparative success of the railway
and other similarly authorised undertakings. The
difficulty to be overcome in the early fifties was of a
somewhat different character, though it is all part of
the same problem. The initial difficulty from which
all others proceed is the necessity which ex hypothesi
has arisen for the compulsory expropriation of private
property for purposes of some public convenience.
We have already given our reasons for considering
that the right conferred on a railway company is by
no means a monopoly in the sense that it enables the
railway to charge exorbitant rates. This seems more
especially to be true with regard to a Metropolitan
railway, which is by no means set free from the
competition of omnibuses, cabs, tramways, steamers,
and (perhaps most important of all) of walking on
our own ten toes. The whole endeavour of the owners
of a Metropolitan railway must be to induce us to
prefer their line to other methods of transport, and
also to make journeys which, but for the convenience
they offer, we should never undertake at all. The
right to acquire property at an exorbitant price
confers little benefit on the railway company. Justly
THE WOEK BEGUN 157
enough, property acquired under such conditions has to
be paid for at an ample rate of compensation, but this
setting aside of the principle of free exchange, inevitable
though perhaps it may have been, is the occasion of the
whole difficulty of the situation. An owner who is
compelled to sell naturally fights to obtain the utmost
compensation ; hence costly legal proceedings, and costly
terms of acquisition. At the date of Mr. Fowler's
first connection with the Metropolitan Railway no one
ventured to say that the public would be overcharged,
and that therefore the way-leave granted ought only to
be granted to a public body. The main opposition
came rather from property owners, and from those who
alleged that in some way or other their proprietary
interests were adversely affected by the proposed
line. These, it need hardly be said, in a crowded
Metropolis were innumerable, and when once the
principle of free exchange has to be abandoned the
difficulties of assessing values for the purposes of
compulsory exchange become enormous. Indeed, con-
sidering the mass of property and interests affected, the
business aspects of the construction of this line were
really more formidable than its engineering difficulty.
In stating, in 1855, that the work of the Metropolitan
Railway was about to begin, Mr. Fowler was somewhat
too sanguine. The preliminary difficulties were not
overcome till 1859, and the works were not actually
commenced till March, 1860.
The original programme was varied from time to
time. Sir B. Baker gives the following account of
these changes of plan :—
"In 1861 powers were obtained for extending the Metro-
politan Eailway to Moorgate Street, and for widening the line
158 METROPOLITAN EAILWAY
from King's Cross eastwards ; and in 1864 for constructing the
Eastern and Western Extensions to Tower Hill and Brompton
respectively, the District Railway from Brompton to Tower
Hill and the St. John's Wood Railway. Owing to financial
difficulties the Metropolitan Railway Company sought to
abandon the Eastern Extension in 1870, but the Bill was
thrown out by the Lords. An alternative mode of completing
the Inner Circle by Fenchurch Street, instead of by Tower
Hill, was authorised in 1871, but the latter and original
route is the one adopted. As regards the Western Extension,
Mr. Fowler's first idea was to take it through Kensington
Gardens and Hyde Park; but the authorities objected, and
the present line was selected. Practically there was very
little choice in laying out the Metropolitan Railway, for the
Lords' committee of 1863 decided that ' it would be desirable
to complete an inner circuit of railway that should abut upon,
if it did not actually join, nearly all the principal railway
termini in the Metropolis, commencing with the extension in
an easterly and southerly direction of the Metropolitan Rail-
way, from Finsbury Circus at the one end, and in a westerly
and southerly direction from Paddington at the other, and con-
necting the extremities of those lines by a line on the north
side of the Thames.' The Inner Circle of railways as con-
structed is the direct outcome of that recommendation. The
total length of the line is 13 miles 8 chains, of which about
two miles are laid with four lines of rails, and there are twenty-
seven stations."
The following is a table of the proportions made
by the different engineers : —
ENGINEER. LENGTH EXECUTED. PERCENTAGE.
Miles. Chains.
John Fowler . . 11 20 .86
Edward Wilson . 27 . 2J
Francis Brady . 28 2£
Jas. Tomlinson, jun. . 35 3£
Hawkshaw and Barry . 58 . 5J
13 8 100
THE COST 159
Of the cost of this railway it is difficult to give
any precise estimate, " because the financial liabilities
assumed by the contractors varied from time to time,
and other complicating conditions entered into the
question." The following, however, is Sir B. Baker's
summary on this head :—
"In 1871, when the works had been completed and opened
from Moorgate Street to Mansion House, the expenditure on
capital account by the District Kailway Company for works
and equipment of 7J miles of double line railway was stated
in the Directors' Keport to have been £5,147,000, and by the
Metropolitan Railway Company £5,856,000 for 10£ miles, both
amounts being subject to deduction in respect of surplus lands.
It must, however, be remembered that these figures, as already
intimated, are of little value to an engineer, because they
include items dependent, among other things, upon the
market value of the shares, which in the case of the Metro-
politan ranged from 50 to 140, and in that of the District from
20 to 100, during the making of the lines."
The completion of the so-called Inner Circle, accord-
ing to Sir J. Wolfe Barry, was completed for about
£3,250,000. This, however, includes something like
£1,000,000 contributed to the making of new streets,
as well as the cost of the Whitechapel extension.
It may here be noted that the so-called circle railway
is not circular, but is really two parallel lines running
east and west, connected at each end by comparatively
short lengths running north and south. This fact, it
is alleged, has interfered with the value of the railway
as a communication between the north and the south.
The set of the traffic of London has apparently always
been from east to west. We may conjecture that this
tendency was originally imparted to it by the water-
160 METROPOLITAN KAILWAY
way of the Thames, which, on the whole, runs from
west to east. Every additional facility in the way
of streets and railways increases the tendency of the
traffic to concentrate itself on this route, so that it is
difficult to say whether the growth of East and West
London is due to comparatively ample transport
accommodation, or whether the better transport ac-
commodation is due to the agglomeration of popula-
tion in the western and in the eastern parts of the
city.
We have dealt with the route followed by the rail-
way ; we must next say something on the equally
important question of the level on which the rails
are laid.
" When a tract of country is closely covered by buildings of
varying heights, and the natural watercourses are converted
into covered sewers, it is difficult to form a general idea of the
physical features determining more or less the character of the
railway as regards level and gradients.
"In the case of the Metropolitan, however, a sufficient
record exists of the previous conditions of the country, and
the excavations have, in many instances, afforded an interesting
confirmation of traditions."
The reader must be referred to Mr. Loftus, or some
other history of London, for a picture of a primitive
" Lynn din," or Port of the Waters, standing on the
hill, which we now know as the City, with a tidal
estuary running up from the Thames, along the course
of the Fleet, or Hole-Bourne, a river which descended
from the Hampstead and Highgate Hills. To the
engineer the facts of the case are presented by the
statement that within a few yards of their institution
in Great George Street, Westminster, the level of the
THE UNDERGROUND RIVERS OF LONDON 161
footway is eight feet below the highest tide, while at
Hampstead the height is 443 feet above the ordnance
datum.
"The highest ground traversed by the Inner Circle is at
Edgware Road, and the lowest at the back of Victoria Street,
Westminster, the respective heights being 103 feet and 8 feet
above ordnance datum. At Swiss Cottage the rails of the
St. John's Wood branch climb to a height of 167 feet, and
at King's Scholar Pond Sewer in Victoria Street the District
Railway dips to a depth of 9 feet below the same datum,
or 3 feet below Thames low water."
The course of the streams that in olden times flowed
to the Thames from the Northern Hills is always a
matter of interest to Londoners, though now these
streams are confined in sewers. Still, even in their
degraded condition we are glad to hear of them from
engineers who encounter them on their subterranean
work.
" To the west of Kensington and Chelsea, rising in the high
ground, but traversing chiefly the low-lying district, was the
Bridge Creek, now known as the Counters Creek Sewer, which
is carried under the District Railway at Warwick Road in a
flat-topped channel 7~ feet wide and 8 feet high.
. . . Proceeding eastwards, the next stream met with was
the West Bourne, rising on the western flank of Hampstead
Hill and flowing southwards to the Serpentine, and thence
into the Thames near Chelsea Bridge. This, now called the
Ranelagh Sewer, is carried under the Metropolitan Railway
at Gloucester Terrace and over the District Railway at Sloane
Square Station, the construction in the former case being a
brick channel 9 feet wide by 8 feet high, with flat iron top,
and in the latter a cast-iron tube 9 feet in diameter, supported
on wrought-iron girders of 70 feet span.
"Next in order was the Ty-Bourne, which flowed from
M
162 METROPOLITAN RAILWAY
Hampstead through Regent's Park, thence by Marylebone
Lane — whose strange windings are due to the houses having
originally been built on the banks of the stream — and by
the Green Park to the river between Vauxhall and Chelsea
Bridges. At Baker Street the Metropolitan Railway is crossed
by this stream under its present name of the King's Scholar
Pond Sewer, the construction being a cast-iron oval tube
resting on cast-iron girders. At Victoria Street the District
Railway is similarly crossed, but the size of the tube is 14 feet
by 11 in the latter case, as compared with half those lineal
dimensions at the northern crossings."
The next stream to be dealt with was the famous
Fleet, which proved the most serious difficulty in the
construction of the railway.
"When building the retaining wall on the west side of
Farringdon Street Station, the Fleet, then carried in a slightly-
built brick sewer, 10 feet diameter, resting on the rubbish
filled into the old channel, burst into the works and flooded
the tunnel with sewage for a great distance. Again, when
constructing the District Railway at Blackfriars the Fleet had
to be diverted and re-diverted, carried temporarily in syphons,
and otherwise carefully guarded, as the large volume of water
coming down it necessitated. No less than five crossings of
the Fleet had to be dealt with, namely, two at King's Cross
over the junction curves with the Great Northern Railway,
one at Frederick Street over the Metropolitan Railway, another
at the same spot over the widening lines, and finally a fifth
under the District Railway at Blackfriars Bridge. The first
four crossings were in cast-iron tubes of tunnel section,
ranging in size from 9 feet by 8 to 10 by 10 feet, and the
latter in two brick channels 11 feet 6 inches by 6 feet 6 inches
high, with flat iron tops.
" In regard, therefore, to the natural configuration of the
ground it may be said that the railway on the southern side
of its course ran along an old river-bed through what was once
the swamps of Pimlico and Belgravia, while the northern
LEVELS AND GEADIENTS 163
section of the Metropolitan is on the lower slopes of the
hills that lie to the north of London. The average rail-level
of the District Kail way is 13 feet below Thames high water,
while the northern section is 60 feet above the same level.
" For the purpose of joining the high levels of the north
with the low levels of the southern lengths of the railway,
deep cuttings or tunnels were necessary in the eastern and
western parts of the line.
"In construction, cuttings 42 feet deep and a tunnel 421 yards
in length are found at Campden Hill on the west, and cuttings
33 feet deep and a tunnel 728 yards in length at Clerkenwell
on the east; the respective gradients to get down the sloping
ground being about f mile of 1 in 70 on the west, and 1 mile
of 1 in 100 on the east. Further, as the valleys of the West
Bourne and the Ty-Bourne are crossed by the Metropolitan
Eailway, dipping gradients of 1 in 75 and 1 in 100 are
required at these points. On the District Eailway the rise
from the Fleet Valley to the hill upon which the earliest
parts of the city were built has to be surmounted, and it
is done by a gradient of about J mile of 1 in 100."
Contrary, therefore, to what we might have expected,
the levels and gradients of the Metropolitan Railway
have been very little affected by the buildings and
underground communications of London ; they have
followed very closely the natural configuration of the
land exactly as they might have done in an open
country. The curves, on the other hand, which have
a minimum radius of 10 chains on the Inner Circle
and 6f chains on the Great Northern branch, were
fixed chiefly by the situation of the sources of traffic
and by property considerations.
In his address to the British Association in 1882
Mr. Fowler made the following comments on the diffi-
culties of working a railway with frequent stoppages,
.and throws out a hint as to what would be an ideal
164 METROPOLITAN KAILWAY
arrangement of gradients. The Great Northern Rail-
way, he points out, runs its trains from London to
Grantham, a distance of 105 miles, without stoppage,
so that little power and time are lost. On the Metro-
politan, on the other hand, no sooner has a train ac-
quired a reasonable speed, than the brakes have to be
sharply applied to pull it up again.
"As a result of experiment and calculation," he says, "I
have found that 60 per cent, of the whole power exerted by
the engine is absorbed by the brakes. In other words, with
a consumption of 30 Ibs. of coal per train mile, no less than
18 Ibs. are expended in grinding away the brake blocks, and
only the remaining 12 Ibs. in doing the useful work of over-
coming frictional and atmospheric resistances.
"Comparatively high speed and economy of working might
be attained on a railway with stations at half-mile intervals,
if it were possible to arrange the gradients so that each station
should be on the summit of a hill. An ideal railway would
have gradients of about 1 in 20, falling each way from the
stations, with a piece of horizontal connecting them. With
such gradients, gravity alone would give an accelerating velocity
to the departing train at the rate of 1 mile per hour for every
second; that is to say, in half a minute the train would have
acquired a velocity of 30 miles an hour, whilst the speed of
the approaching train would be correspondingly retarded
without the grinding away of brake blocks. Could such an
undulating railway be carried out, the consumption of fuel
would probably not exceed one-half of that on a dead-level
railway, whilst the mean speed would be one-half greater.
Although the required conditions are seldom attainable in
practice, the broad principles should be kept in view by every
engineer when laying out a railway with numerous stopping-
places."
Most interesting are some of the historical and
geological details which the construction of the rail-
AKCILEOLOGICAL "FINDS" 165
way brought to light. In some places the engineers
found themselves working through 24 feet of ruins
and dust, the deposit of bygone generations of Celts
and Romans, Saxons, Danes, and Normans. The
foundations of an old fort were exposed at the mouth
of the Fleet, and at the Mansion House a masonry
subway was discovered intact. Along the old river-
bed the foundations had to be sunk in some places
to a depth of 37 feet below high water. Beds of
peat were encountered in the swamp of Pimlico.
Below the peat is the London clay, and on this the
railway walls between Gloucester Road and Victoria
were made to rest. On the top of the clay were
found varying depths of sand and gravel heavily
charged with water. This fact necessitated an elaborate
system of pumping, costing, it is estimated, about
£600 per month, during the period of construction.
Permanent pumping-stations are now established at
South Kensington, Victoria, Sloane Square, and the
Temple stations.
The north section of the line was driven through
gravel and sand beds of comparatively small dimensions,
lying on the top of the London clay.
The cuttings and longitudinal section of the railway
show that if what Sir Charles Lyall called the great
ochreous gravel deposits of the Pleistocene Age were
swept away, the hills and valleys of the Metropolitan
area would be practically unaltered in appearance. At
what period in the remote past the sand, gravel, and
brick-earth, cut through by the railway in Westminster
at a level of 8 feet and in Marylebone at 103 feet
above ordnance datum, were deposited no one can tell.
Geological speculation, however, suggests that England
166 METROPOLITAN EAILWAY
was then united to the Continent, that the present site
of the North Sea was dry land, and the Thames a
tributary of the Khine, along whose banks disported
themselves mammoths, woolly rhinoceros, and other
extinct animals, and, possibly, also man.
The Underground Kail way consists of covered ways,
tunnels, and open cuttings with retaining walls.
The greater portion of the line is what is technically
called a covered way, that is to say, the buildings and
the roadway were removed and the necessary excava-
tions made ; the railway was then laid, and again
covered in, and the buildings in some cases recon-
structed. A variety of expedients were employed.
The type of covered way adopted in the first portion
of the railway consisted of "a six-ring elliptical arch,
of 28 feet 6 inches span and 11 feet rise, with side
walls three bricks thick and 5 feet 6 inches high from
the rails to the springing." Originally there was no
" invert " for the support of the side walls, but ex-
perience seems to have shown that this was desirable,
and in later constructions this was generally added.
In places there was not sufficient depth for a brick-
covered way, and here iron girders were substituted.
The cast-iron girders appear to have been more satis-
factory than wrought-iron, as the former suffered less
from oxidation ; but Sir B. Baker's verdict is that the
brickwork, though more costly and involving deeper
cutting, has proved, in the long run, the cheaper and
more satisfactory form of construction.
The erection of the covered way was attended with
the greatest difficulty. Temporary roadways had to be
made in order to interfere as little as possible with the
traffic of the streets. Considerable improvements and
w
o s
6!
£ =
H ^
&. ^
o j
o S
g
5
<:
S
w
X
H
METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION 167
economies were effected as experience dictated. They
began apparently by excavating the whole width of
the cutting, and then protecting the sides and the
foundations of the contiguous buildings, during re-
construction, by balks of timber and struts of a more
or less elaborate character.
The following is Sir B. Baker's description of the
latest and most ingenious device : —
" In later days, when the District Eailway was being con-
structed, the general practice was not to timber the entire
width of covered way, but to sink a couple of six feet wide
trenches for the side walls, to build the latter up to four feet
above springing, take out the excavation full width down to
that level, fix the centering, turn the arch, and finally take out
the ' dumpling.' "
By this contrivance the risk of subsidence of the
adjoining land was reduced, and the new permanent
supports were introduced before the whole of the old
supports were finally removed.
Although to the ordinary traveller the whole of the
Underground seems to be in tunnel, technically there
are only three tunnels on the line — the Clerkenwell
tunnel, 728 yards long, on the original Metropolitan ;
the "Widening" tunnel, 733 yards in length, parallel
to the preceding; and the Campden Hill tunnel, 421
yards in length. Considerable amount of trouble was
experienced with regard to these tunnels, more espe-
cially at Campden Hill. The two first-named tunnels
were driven for the most part through hard and dry
clay, and, as a matter of mere tunnelling, were com-
paratively simple.
"However," says Sir B. Baker, "with the utmost precautions
tunnelling through a town is a risky operation, and settlements
168 METROPOLITAN RAILWAY
may occur years after the completion of the works. Water
mains may be broken in the streets and in the houses, stone
staircases fall down, and other unpleasant symptoms of small
earthquakes alarm the unsuspecting occupants."
In the driving of the tunnels, as well as in making
excavations for the covered way, it was necessary to
proceed by very short lengths at a time in order to
lessen the risk of landslips. Some difference of opinion
arose between the engineers and the contractors on
this point in connection with that most troublesome
bit of the line which traverses Campden Hill. The
soil here is extremely light and loose, and the engineers
insisted that it should be worked in six-feet rather
than twelve-feet lengths.
With regard to that portion of the line which is
made in open cutting, no special remark has to be
made, except that in open cuttings excavated in the
neighbourhood of buildings more than ordinary pre-
cautions are necessary. The same plan which has
been described with regard to the covered ways was
followed here. At first the whole width was timbered
and excavated. In the later work trenches were sunk
and the retaining walls built, and then the "dumpling"
or centre portion was removed in railway waggons.
Such was the normal course of construction. There
were, however, innumerable difficulties of a special
character to be overcome. It must be remembered
that forty years ago work of this class was in its
pioneer stage.
" It is now known," says Sir B. Baker, " what precautions
are necessary to ensure the safety of valuable buildings near to
the excavations ; how to timber the cuttings securely and keep
them clear of water without drawing the sand from under the
VENTILATION 169
foundations of adjoining houses; how to underpin walls, and,
if necessary, carry the railway under houses and within a few
inches of the kitchen floors without pulling down anything;
how to drive tunnels, divert sewers over or under the railway,
keep up the numerous gas and water mains, and maintain the
road traffic when the railway is being carried underneath ; and,
finally, how to construct the covered way, so that buildings of
any height and weight may be erected over the railway without
risk of subsequent injury from settlement or vibration."
It was originally intended to work the line by means
of locomotives of special construction. Very light trains
of three carriages, running at intervals of five to ten
minutes, stopping at alternate stations, would, it was
thought, be sufficient. Mr. Fowler proposed to have a
locomotive using no fuel, but having simply a reservoir
of hot water capable of being heated up again at the
end of each journey, and a reservoir of cold water to
condense the steam ; still he maintained that the line
could be worked by ordinary locomotives. Brunei
supported this view strongly, and declared that even
with ordinary locomotives no special means of ventila-
tion would be found necessary. There had been a
standing order in former days that required committees
of Parliament to report on the means of ventilation
proposed for tunnels. Engineers now thought that
this was unnecessary, and in proof Brunei instanced
his own Box tunnel, where a screen had to be intro-
duced because the draught was excessive. The trains
were to be worked by hot- water locomotives, were
not with passengers to exceed 20 tons, and the trip
from Paddington to the City was to occupy from twelve
to fifteen minutes. Sir B. Baker, who takes a special
delight in pointing out the frequent futility of the
170 METROPOLITAN RAILWAY
prophecy even of experts, remarks that the hot-water
engine was not even tried, trains of 120 instead of
20 tons are used, and the time is doubled. The earlier
part of the line was constructed with a view of
accommodating traffic of small dimensions, and it
is not to be wondered that the ventilation was not
altogether satisfactory. The experiment of the hot-
water type of engine had to be abandoned when it
was decided to allow the trains and engines of other
lines to have running powers over the Metropolitan.
The earlier portion of the line was, for the convenience
of the Great Western Railway, laid with broad-gauge
rails, and the earliest engines used on the Metropolitan
were supplied by the Great Western.
The type of engine is thus described in Sir B.
Baker's often-quoted paper :—
"It was a six-wheel broad-gauge tank engine, having four
coupled wheels 6 feet in diameter, and outside cylinders
16 inches by 24 inches. The heating surface of tubes was
615 square feet, of fire-box 125 square feet, and the grate
area was 18'5 square feet; a tank of 375 gallons capacity
and a condenser of 420 gallons were provided."
This arrangement, after continuing for some months,
was ended by a dispute as to terms between the Great
Western Railway and the Metropolitan. The Great
Western Railway withdrew their engines and the
Metropolitan had to turn for assistance to the Great
Northern Railway.
" The engines used were six-wheeled tender engines, having
four coupled wheels 5 feet 4 inches in diameter, cylinders
15 \ inches by 22 inches, and a total heating surface from
760 to 940 square feet. Experience showed that both the
Great Western and the Great Northern engines were too
ME. FOWLER'S LETTER 171
light for their work, and the powerful tank engines now used
on the line were designed by Mr. Fowler and Messrs. Beyer
and Peacock. These engines have four coupled wheels 5 feet
9 inches in diameter, a four-wheel bogie, and cylinders 17 inches
in diameter by 24 inches length of stroke. The heating surface
of the fire-box is 103 square feet, of the tubes 909 square feet,
and the grate area is 19 square feet. The weight in working
order is between 42 and 43 tons, with 1,000 gallons of water
in the tanks."
Mr. Fowler, who was prevented by illness from
being present at the reading of the paper from which
we have so largely quoted, wrote a letter which is
entered on the minutes, stating how grateful he was
" to his old friend and partner, Mr. Baker, and he
was sure every member of the institution would be
equally so, for the trouble he had taken in searching-
through old documents bearing upon the early history
of the Metropolitan Railway, and describing so fully
the works of the Inner Circle." He associated himself
with Mr. Baker in his tribute to Mr. Pearson, the
City solicitor. The only other point he desired to
mention was one which might be encouraging to the
younger members of the profession. At the monthly
meetings of the directors, members of the Board used
frequently to tell him that they were warned by
engineers that the line would never be made ; that
even if made, it could never be worked ; and that
even if worked, that no one would travel by it. This,
as he mildly puts it, was rather discouraging, but he
knew his business and believed in it, and the directors
believed in him, and he did make it, did work it, and
the public travelled by it.
The first section of the Metropolitan Railway was
172 METROPOLITAN RAILWAY
opened on January 9th, 1863. The idea that the
Metropolitan was a line of connection between the
great trunk lines having stations in London is to be
found in most of the notices of the opening of the
line. The Times describes the new line as the begin-
ning of a system of conveying traffic across London
without break of carriage, an expectation which we
know has never been realised.
An entry made by Mr. Fowler in his wife's diary
records that Professor and Mrs. Owen came to Queen
Square Place, by appointment, at twelve o'clock, and
accompanied the engineer, Mrs. Fowler, and their eldest
son to Bishop's Eoad Station, where they received the
Lord Mayor, Lord Harris, Mr. Lowe, and other dis-
tinguished guests. At one o'clock they started in the
first train. They stopped at each station and examined
it thoroughly, especially those at Portland Road and
King's Cross, till they reached Farringdon Street.
Part of the station here was enclosed, and an ' ' elegant
dejeuner" provided by the directors for 650 people.
The Prime Minister, Lord Palmerston, had been invited
to take part in the opening ceremony, but excused him-
self on the score of his age and engagements, adding
with a sparkle of his never-failing humour, that for his
part he was anxious to keep above ground as long as
he could. In his absence, Mr. R. Lowe, M.P., called
on the company to drink a bumper to the success of
the Metropolitan Railway, and described Mr. Fowler
as the modern St. George, who had four times van-
quished the Fleet ditch. The enterprise, he de-
clared, " was an honour to the country, and a solid
advance worthy of civilisation." The Lord Mayor con-
gratulated himself and the Corporation because they
f-r ^>
II £
m
$#***
I
. Q
| £
PL} ss o S3
s ^ ^ w
<
(H !>,£
13
d w
•Jltf
^H*
M cJ ro 4- invo
THE OPENING CEREMONY 173
had relaxed their rule against embarking in private
speculation, and had allowed themselves to subscribe
£200,000 towards the great public improvement which
they were inaugurating. Lord Harris proposed the
health of Mr. Fowler, who in reply gave a brief history
of the construction of the line. The difficulty of raising
capital he ascribed mainly to the Kussian War, and he
concluded by publicly thanking those who had been
engaged with him in carrying out this great work.
"Of the directors it would not be proper for me to say
more than that they have always given me a most generous
and unbounded confidence, without which I feel the task
would have been beyond my powers. I wish especially to
thank my old assistant and friend, Mr. Johnson, who has
acted as resident engineer of the line throughout, and of
whose assiduity and intelligence I cannot speak too highly. I
have also to thank the contractors, Messrs. Smith and Knight
and Mr. Jay, for the admirable manner in which they have done
their work and their prompt attention to my instructions."
Among the distinguished men who showed interest in
the new line none were more eager than Mr. Gladstone,
and, shortly after its opening, Mr. Fowler sent him, in
April, 1863, an elaborate statement of its progress, from
which the following extract is taken :—
"From the great interest you took in this work during
its construction, it has occurred to me that you will feel
an interest in its working ; and in the hope that it will not
be troublesome to you, I have had a few statistical facts pre-
pared for your perusal. The line was opened to the public on
January 10th last.
"The number of passengers already carried
exceeds . ... 2,000,000
The average receipt per passenger is . . 2'8224d.
The average number of passengers daily is 28,687
Greatest number carried in one day . . 60,000
174
METROPOLITAN KAILWAY
Mileage.
Total Number
of Passengers
in 18(52.
Total Number
of Passengers
per Mile per
Annum.
Passenger
Receipts
per Mile
for One
Week in
March.
£ s.
d.
664
10,375,322
15,625
16 14
2
992
7,302,156
7,361
22 2
9
1,179
18,142,506
15,388
29 11
3
72£
2,508,175
34,715
29 13
6
330
5,237,323
15,871
30 1
9
442£
8,925,987
20,183
30 16
7
247i
11,928,355
48,244
40 2
1
806
12,388,227
40,484
45 8
1]
9
6,580,173
731,130
216 15
7
5|
9,103,390
1,583,200
247 0
0
3|
10,470,750
2,792,200
629 11
5
"The following figures give the mileage, passenger receipts
per mile, and total number of passengers in one year of all the
Metropolitan railways : —
Name of Line.
Great Eastern
Great Western .
London and North Western
London, Chatham and Dover
Great Northern .
London and South Western
London, Brighton and South \
Coast . . . . j
South Eastern .
North London .
Blackwall ....
Metropolitan according to )
present rate of traffic . )
"Although the traffic of the Metropolitan line has been
very large, it must be remembered that the City terminus
of the company is at present situate in Farringdon Street,
a distance of about one mile from the Bank. When the
company's extension to Finsbury is completed, the number
of passengers will be largely increased.
"The traffic of the line at present is purely local, and
is entirely of the character of an omnibus traffic. There is
a large traffic between the terminal stations, but a very
considerable proportion is conveyed between intermediate
stations.
" The proportion of passengers of each class carried in the
month of February was as under : —
First class . . . .17 per cent.
Second class . . . . 31 „
Third class . . . 52
"The experience of working for some months has quite
dispelled all fear as to noise and vibration to either streets
or houses. I have heard no complaints of any kind, and
the feeling generally appears to be that a vast convenience
is accomplished without interferences with streets or otherwise,
CONGKATULATIONS 175
and that the appearance of London is not prejudicially affected
by anything we have done.
" Altogether it is a source of great satisfaction to me that
the result appears fully equal to the opinion you were kind
enough to form of the interesting undertaking. I know how
much you are engaged, and especially at the present time,
and I beg you will not take the trouble to acknowledge the
communication.
" I remain, my dear sir,
" Yours very truly,
"JOHN FOWLER.
" The Right Honourable W. E. Gladstone, M.P.
"April, 1863."
Among the numerous letters of congratulation
received by Mr. Fowler on the completion of his great
enterprise, none was more valued by him than that
which was sent to him by his father (then in his
seventy-ninth year), who, notwithstanding his age,
had come up from Sheffield to attend the ceremony :—
"WADSLEY HALL,
"January 12th, 1863.
" MY DEAR JOHN, — I had a comfortable journey home on
Saturday, and arrived safely at Sheffield at two o'clock.
Although I had no companion on my way, my thoughts on
the opening of the Metropolitan Eailway fully occupied me.
" I most sincerely congratulate you on that occasion. Your
numerous friends felt a gratification on the proceedings of
that day no less than your father, although none could feel
as your own father could feel, having had the opportunity
of watching from your youth that progress in life which,
from your natural talent, united with great energy and sound
judgment, has been the means of raising you to the high
estimation in which your friends and the public hold you.
"The proceedings of last Friday will be long remembered
by your friends, and they will look back on that day with
176 METROPOLITAN RAILWAY
great pleasure, and none more so than your own father, while
life is permitted him to enjoy the reflection of that day's
proceedings. ... I have had the opportunity of reading the
report of the proceedings (which I think correctly stated), and
especially your speech ; all parties who have read it seem to
make out that it was to the point, and the proper word, and
each word in its place.
" Your generosity in speaking of Mr. Johnson's great assist-
ance does credit alike to your head and your heart. Several
who have read your speech make the same remark as myself.
" And now, my dear John, I hope that the very high esti-
mation in which your friends and the public hold you, will
not have the effect to raise yourself nor any part of your family
in your own importance, but that you will keep that humble
and even path in life which has hitherto marked your progress
in all these matters. I beg to thank you for your kind and
pressing invitation to the opening, and I am glad I accepted
it. I believe I have not taken any cold, and am very well
this morning. ... " Yours affectionately,
"JOHN FOWLER.
"John Fowler, Esq."
A correspondent, Mr. Charles Stanley, writing con-
gratulations to Mr. Fowler on the opening of the
Metropolitan Railway, recalls a committee-room incident
of the year 1845 :—
"During the great parliamentary campaign of 1845, when
two rival lines were projected from Sheffield into Derbyshire,
I remember hearing you cross-examined as to one of them
which skirted the moors. 'I believe, Mr. Fowler/ said the
opposing counsel, 'your line goes by the name of the Grouse
and Trout Line.' 'Very likely/ you replied, 'and your line
is called the Flute Line, because it is nearly all tunnel/ It
is singular that you should have now sensibly added to your
fame by the construction of a line, the distinguishing charac-
teristic of which is that it is nearly all tunnel — in fact, a
genuine flute line."
SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENTS 177
With regard to the services of the late City solicitor,
Mr. Pearson, Mr. Fowler was much gratified in being
able to put in a favourable light the claims of his widow
on the Metropolitan Company and also on the Corpora-
tion, and among the letters preserved is a very grateful
acknowledgment of his kindness from Mrs. Pearson.
The work of Fowler in making the Metropolitan
Railway was a pioneer effort, and many improvements
have since been added to the business of tunnelling
under cities. The usefulness of a pioneer effort is
often, as we have already insisted, to be measured by
the rapidity and completeness with which its methods
are improved and superseded.
In the foregoing description of the Metropolitan
Railway we mentioned how important the engineers
considered it to complete the tunnel arch at as early
a point of the construction as possible. In the later
period of the work the arch was keyed and the soil
under the arch, ''the dumpling," was removed after-
wards. In recent years the jshield. patented by Brunei
as long ago as 1818 has been used with success for
the driving of iron tunnels through the bowels of the
earth at so low a depth that disturbance of the surface
and buildings no longer occurs. A steel cylinder forced
forward by hydraulic pressure prepares the way, and, as
the material is removed and the steel cylinder works
its way forward, an iron tunnel of a slightly smaller
diameter is put in its place. The space so left round
the outside of the iron tunnel is filled with a prepara-
tion of strong cement, forced in by compressed air
at a pressure of 50 Ibs. to the square inch. The whole
structure is thus sealed and completed with a minimum
of disturbance to existing buildings.
N
178 METROPOLITAN RAILWAY
One other element, denied by a series of accidents to
Fowler's earlier work, is necessary to the successful use
of the shield system of deep tunnelling. Mr. Fowler,
as we have seen, abandoned very reluctantly his special
engines designed for the use of the Underground
Railway. In his address to the Merchant Venturers'
School, in 1893, after reciting the circumstances under
which this took place, he adds :—
" But the ventilation has always been an objection and a
difficulty, notwithstanding various attempts to improve it ;
but experience has shown that so long as trains run every
two or three minutes, no satisfactory ventilation can be ob-
tained with the present type of engine, or any modification
of it, and the only solution of the difficulty with our present
knowledge appears to be the adoption of an electric motor
similar to that used on the South London Railway.
" In my opinion we may expect henceforth that all under-
ground railways in London will be constructed on the plan of
the Oxford Street scheme, which avoids disturbing the streets
or houses above the railway, and worked by an electric motor."
The late Mr. J. H. Greathead was the engineer, and
Sir John Fowler and his partner, Sir Benjamin Baker,
were the consulting engineers on the City and South
London Railway, which was the first railway con-
structed as above described.
CHAPTER VII.
PEESIDENT OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL
ENGINEEKS
IN 1863, as already narrated, the first portion of the
Metropolitan Railway was completed. The most
interesting excursion of the following year, 1864, was
the inspection of the Glasgow Waterworks. The
bursting of a reservoir at Sheffield had caused a good
deal of alarm among the persons responsible for
waterworks throughout the country. Mr. Fowler had
been employed in the inquiry which followed this
disaster. "With him were Mr. La Trobe Bateman and
two other engineers. They unanimously agreed that
the bursting of the reservoir was due to the sliding of
the clay foundation of the dam and puddle trench
(under the pressure of a landslip in an adjacent hill)
upon the shaly rock beneath.
The Glasgow municipality very naturally desired to
reassure themselves by submitting their works to the
inspection of the best engineering opinion of the day.
Accordingly, in August, 1864, Mr. Fowler, accompanied
by the Lord Provost and the committee of the water-
works, Mr. Bateman and Mr. Gale, the engineers, and
other gentlemen, made a tour of inspection among the
beautiful lakes of the Trossachs which supply Glasgow
with water. The works, he writes to his wife, are
179
180 PRESIDENT OF THE INSTITUTION
"well and neatly executed," but, he adds in his
capacity of salmon fisher, " steps or stairs have been
made for the passage of salmon from the river into the
loch above (Loch Vennacher), but they are not
executed in a proper manner," a point which, we are
glad to find, was duly noticed in his formal report
to the Corporation. The works on Loch Vennacher
and Loch Drunkie are only incidental to the supply of
Glasgow, and were really obligations put on the
Corporation for the benefit of the mill owners on the
streams below.
The water-supply of Glasgow, as all the world
knows, is taken from Loch Katrine, by means of
sluices placed on the south side of the loch. These
sluices admit the water into a tunnel and aqueducts
which carry it to Glasgow, a distance of about thirty
miles.
" The works of the Glasgow Corporation Waterworks, which
we inspected yesterday," he writes to his wife, " consist chiefly
of a tunnel under the hills, 8 feet wide and 8 feet high, with
aqueducts over the valleys constructed of stone piers about
45 feet apart, with a wrought-iron trough to convey the water
resting on them. Some of these works are of considerable
extent. The larger valleys, of which there are three, are
crossed by pipes laid down to the bottom of the valley and
up the other side to save the great expense which would have
been involved by long, high aqueducts."
The report to the Corporation on the state of their
property, dated November 7th, 1864, is signed by
John Fowler, J. F. Bateman, and James M. Gale, and
is very satisfactory and reassuring. Certain minor
recommendations involving an expenditure of about
£9,000 were made.
EEPOET ON GLASGOW WATERWORKS 181
"We have given our reasons in detail for the recommenda-
tion of expending a sum of £9,000, and have stated that a
considerable portion of this expenditure is rather to place
every portion of the work, as far as human foresight can do
so, beyond the possibility of serious casualty than to remedy
existing defects; but our report would scarcely be complete,
or convey a correct impression, unless we were to add, in
conclusion, that the works are admirably fulfilling the purposes
for which they were designed, as to present and future require-
ments ; and the great works of construction are of the most
sound and durable character,"
This approval of the Glasgow Waterworks was of
considerable importance, for Glasgow has been a
pioneer in the movement which has led great centres
of population to bring their water-supply from large
natural or artificial lakes, situated at a distance.
Here, again, the art of the engineer is raising new
and important questions of equity and jurisprudence.
To whom does the water-supply of an upland country-
side of right belong ? What compensation is to be
given to landowners, to other towns competing for the
same source of supply, to country villages and farms
whose springs are tapped by the marauders from the
great towns? The Glasgow water-supply was, of
course, taken from an already existing lake. By com-
paratively simple means the level of the loch was
actually raised, notwithstanding the water taken from
it, and so comparatively little disturbance was made ;
but when artificial lakes are made, and the springs of
many hillsides are diverted into aqueducts for the
supply of a distant town, the case becomes more
serious ; and, if we mistake not, we are here face to
face with one of the most difficult questions of the
immediate future. The problem has been raised by
182 PEESIDENT OF THE INSTITUTION
the new values created by engineering progress, and,
as on so many other occasions, we have no doubt that
the progress of jurisprudence will be found equal to
its solution.
Later in the year we find he was in the Isle of Wight,
superintending the extension of the island railways, the
greater part of which had been laid down by him.
In 1865 he took the important step of purchasing
from Mr. Davidson of Tulloch the Highland estate of
Braemore, and from that date he began to identify his
interests with Scotland.
Of a visit paid to Dunrobin about this time, for the
purpose of advising the Duke of Sutherland about
his private railway venture, he writes an interesting
account to his wife. " It is," he says, "a most difficult
decision for the Duke to make, but I hope to be of
use to him." The result of the Duke's deliberations on
the question of the railway was that he made a con-
siderable portion of this line at his own sole expense.
This was ultimately sold to the Highland Eailway at a
price very much below what it had cost the Duke to
make. In the evening a novel employment was found
for Mr. Fowler. One of the ladies of the party was
prevailed on to sing, if he would finish her letters
dismissing one cook and engaging another. This
he accomplished most successfully, and, he says, in
exactly the words which were thought to meet the
occasion. He also was commissioned to write a letter
to an absent husband. In this, however, he was less
successful, as his effort was pronounced to be " not
quite affectionate enough."
On February 13th, 1865, Mr. Fowler became a
member of the Engineer and Kailway Volunteer Staff
FOWLER AS VOLUNTEER 183
Corps which was then being organised. In this body
he continued to take a warm interest for the rest of
his life. He was made commandant of the corps in
1891. This interesting and useful body never, we
are informed, makes any public appearance as part of
Her Majesty's forces, but it is a body to be consulted
by the War Office in matters in which it may be
thought advantageous to obtain the opinion of railway
experts. In December, 1892, he received the rank of
honorary colonel and the Volunteer medal given in
recognition of twenty years' service.
The years from 1860 to 1866 were probably the
busiest years of Mr. Fowler's life. The office entries
show that he and his staff were during each of these
years actively engaged in advising upon, and in many
cases actively superintending, on an average, some
seventy or eighty large engineering undertakings. It
is not too much to say that at this period no consider-
able engineering project was set on foot without his
service being called in, either for the promoters or for
the opposers. The following are among the principal
works belonging to the decade 1860-1870 : extensions
of the Metropolitan Eailway to Farringdon Street, the
Metropolitan District Railway and other extensions of
the underground system, the Oswestry and Dolgelly
line, the Bristol and Clifton Railway, Liverpool Central
Station, the Glasgow and City Railway, with a viaduct
over the Clyde, St. Enoch's Station in the same city,
Millwall Docks, railways in Devon and in Cheshire.
He also advised H.M.'s Office of Works as to the
bridges in the Regent's Park and as to the Serpentine
and other ornamental waters in the London Parks.
In 1866 he was elected president of the Institution
184 PKESIDENT OF THE INSTITUTION
of Civil Engineers, the highest honour which it is in
the power of his professional brethren to bestow. He
was at this time only forty-nine years of age, and the
youngest president who ever sat in the chair. His
portrait was painted by Millais, and presented to the
Institution by his fellow-engineers. A reproduction of
this, one of Millais' earliest portraits, is added to this
volume. His presidential address is so characteristic of
the man and of the position he occupies in the history
of engineering that we make no apology for reproducing
it in full. It is mainly concerned with the education of
the engineer.^
" We of the passing generation," said the president,
"had to acquire our professional knowledge as best
we could." It is characteristic of Fowler that, though
his education was of the most practical nature, no one
was more keenly alive to the advantage of applying
sound scientific principles to engineering work. He
supplied the deficiency of his earlier training by an
astonishing quickness in apprehending the teaching of
the new science, by the aid of precedents gathered in a
professional experience of extraordinary variety, and
by the careful selection of qualified assistants.
The Times of January llth, 1866, makes the follow-
ing comment on engineering education. The sentiment
reads a little strangely at the present day. The views
of Mr. Eobert Lowe (Lord Sherbrooke) as to educa-
tional endowments were still a power in the columns
of the Times and in the land. After dwelling on the
dangers of endowments, " which, if they encourage and
direct, also have a tendency to narrow and confine,"
the article continues : —
* See Appendix.
FOWLEE ON EDUCATION 185
"Civil engineering has hitherto been free from this danger.
If endowed, it is at any rate free. Offering very lucrative
prizes to the ambition of the students, it leaves them quite
at liberty to seek for the instruction necessary to obtain these
prizes when and where they please. The result has been what
might naturally be expected ; the human mind, being steadily
bent on attaining one particular kind of knowledge, has found
the means of knowledge for itself, and the engineers of
England occupy a position all the prouder because it is due
to no extraneous assistance.
" Such were the feelings with which we heard the excellent
address to the Institute of Civil Engineers from their president,
Mr. Fowler, a man who though not, as far as we are aware,
possessed of any university degree, or any other distinction than
the modest letters ' C.E.' which follow his name, has probably
done as much to promote the prosperity and spread the repu-
tation of England as any person of his class in the country."
The following retrospect from an address delivered
by Sir John Fowler more than a quarter of a century
after this date is worth quoting as showing the sustained
interest which he took in engineering education : —
" It is now twenty- seven years ago," he says, addressing the
Merchant Venturers' School at Bristol in 1893, "when, as
president of the Institution of Civil Engineers, I selected for
the subject of my inaugural address the education and train-
ing of the engineer. . . . The time had evidently arrived for
taking up this subject with earnestness and energy, and wide
circulation was promptly given to this address in England and
our colonies, and especially by the Indian Government, who
sent out copies to all their engineers in India.
"We had already gone far beyond the stage of 'rule of
thumb,' when good work and good materials were considered
sufficient to constitute excellence. It was inevitable, under
such a rule, that much of the material got into the wrong
place, or was wasted in needless profusion. In those days
of 'rule of thumb,' when a well-known engineer was remon-
186 PEESIDENT OF THE INSTITUTION
strated with on the excessive quantity of material he put
into his works, he made the reply, ' Keinember, it takes rather
a clever man to know when a work is too strong, but any
fool can tell when it falls down.'
"The word 'practical' is a word of which English people
have always been proud, and no doubt it is an excellent and
significant word; but before the comparatively recent intro-
duction of technical training, sound theories, and careful
calculations the expression 'practical' applied only to a
thorough knowledge of the quality of the material and work-
manship, and not to their economical and scientific arrangement.
" But now the word ' practical ' would be felt to be almost
a term of reproach unless it was combined with a knowledge
of sound principles.
"On the other hand, the word 'theory,' or 'a theoretical
person,' were terms almost of derision, and no doubt when you
saw a young student with just sufficient mathematical know-
ledge to calculate the stresses on a simple girder, dubbing
himself an engineer, without the slightest knowledge of the
quality of the material or of the workmanship, you were not
surprised to hear such a person spoken of with considerable
contempt. . . .
" This one-sided knowledge is now a thing of the past, or
very nearly so, and the professor's knowledge of theory and
the workman's knowledge of practice are expected to be
combined and taught together to the same individual, both
in regard to large things and small. . . . The rate of progress
in arriving at the present stage of theoretical and practical
teaching has, of late years, been astonishingly rapid, and
especially since about the date of my address in 1866. . . .
It is common knowledge that the facilities were not then
either great or numerous ; and although it would be unbe-
coming and incorrect to say that there were no good technical
colleges, yet I suppose for one technical institution in those days
there are now fifty, and the higher qualifications of the teaching
staff and the superior character of the laboratories have pro-
gressed almost as much as the numbers of the institutions."
COOPEE'S HILL 187
His interest in engineering education led him to
support and follow with friendly sympathy the fortunes
of the Engineering College at Cooper's Hill.
Speaking at the distribution of prizes on July 25th,
1888, Sir John told his audience that his first con-
nection with the college had been at the time when the
Government of India found themselves unable to give
employment to every Cooper's Hill student who had
passed his examination, as had been the practice, and
when it became a question whether the college should
be continued or given up altogether, Lord Cranbrook,
who was then Secretary of State, asked him for his
advice.
" I then," continued Sir John, " took on myself the responsi-
bility of advising that the experiment of keeping on the college
should be made, provided that the Government of India felt
themselves at liberty to give the students a certain limited
number of appointments in India. This has been done, and
the result was most thoroughly and completely successful."
During the last years of his life he was consulted by
a friend as to the best education for a son who in-
tended to follow engineering as his profession. Sir
John's reply was at once shrewd and practical. " If
the young man has the force of character to resist the
temptations to idleness which beset the student at
the Universities, and if he has any aptitude for a
serious study of the higher mathematics, then let him
go to Cambridge." Otherwise, Cooper's Hill and the
earliest possible introduction to the practical work of
the profession were his recommendations. The con-
ditions on which a Cambridge curriculum was con-
sidered desirable were very stringently expressed, so
188 PKESIDENT OF THE INSTITUTION
much so that probably very few young men would be
able to satisfy them. Such at least was the conclusion
of both father and son in this particular case.
In the year 1870 Mr. Fowler visited Norway as
member of a commission appointed to advise the
Indian Government on the subject of gauges. A
broad gauge of 5 feet 6 inches had been adopted in
the great trunk lines of India, but for the less im-
portant lines it was thought that economy and
efficiency would be served by the adoption of a
narrower gauge. Mr. Fowler's experience in respect
of the Great Western line had formed in him a strong
objection to any break of gauge. The question sub-
mitted to the commission, however, assumed that the
Government of India felt itself obliged to adopt a
break of gauge, and the experts were asked to say
which narrow gauge was the best. Mr. Fowler's col-
leagues were General Strachey, Colonel Dickens, and
Mr. (now Sir) A. Meadows Rendel. The Duke of
Sutherland accompanied the party in his private
capacity, and the commission was attended by Mr.
Carl Pihl, the Norwegian Government Engineer of
Eailways. The Norwegian railways are on a 3 feet
6 inches gauge. The rails and engines are very light,
and the rate of speed is very slow. Mr. Fowler
thought the gauge was narrow enough, and that the
rails and engines were too slight for economy. His
colleagues, however, recommended a 2 foot 9 inch
gauge as suitable for India. Mr. Fowler wrote a
minority report to the effect that the 3 foot 6 inch
gauge was the narrowest which he could approve.
In the event the Government has adopted the metre
gauge, a 3 foot 3J inch gauge, thus inclining more
VISIT TO INDIA 189
towards Mr. Fowler's opinion than to that of the
majority report. In 1889 he paid a visit to India,
and his inspection of the Indian railway system seems
to have satisfied him that his advice was correct.
The bent of his mind in this, and indeed in all other
matters, was ever against what seemed to him a " penny
wise and pound foolish " policy. During this visit to
India in 1889 he was consulted by Sir F. (now Lord)
Eoberts, on the question of the steep gradients on the
Jhelum and Eawalpindi Kailway, which varied from
1 in 50 to 1 in 100. The alternatives proposed for
improving this most important strategic line were :
(1) to double the existing line without altering
gradients — marked by Fowler in memo, now before
us as "unanimously rejected"; (2) to use heavier
engines and rails — rejected as impracticable owing to
sharp curves and liability to breakdown due to
enormous engines, and strain on couplings, etc. ;
(3) to regrade the line, leaving two stiff gradients of
1 in 50 where bank engines should be employed.
This last proposal had been provisionally accepted by
the Government, and an expenditure of some 18 lacs
of rupees sanctioned. The objections to this were the
expense of bank engines and the inefficiency of the
arrangement for press of traffic in war times. Mr.
Fowler estimated the cost of regrading the line
throughout at 49 lacs. His characteristic conclusion is
as follows : —
" As a practical question for a commercial railway it would,
in my opinion, be wise to spend 31 lacs to get rid of two banks
of -g1^. If so, still more would it be wise to do so to meet
the possible military requirements, when a breakdown (probable
enough with the hurry and confusion and rush of war emer-
190 PKESIDENT OF THE INSTITUTION
gencies) would be an incalculable risk. I cannot doubt the
Indian Office will sanction the improvement of the whole line
tO T^."
The experience which he gained, and the work which
he did in these years, seem to justify the estimate of
his qualifications as an engineer which he himself pro-
pounded, when in the year 1882 he was invited to
preside over the Mechanical Science Section of the
British Association, which met at Southampton.
" A well-informed man," he said, " has been defined to be a
man who knows a little about everything and all about some-
thing. If you give me credit for being a well-informed
engineer, I will endeavour to justify your good opinion by
showing, whilst presiding at these meetings, that I know a
little about steam-navigation and machinery generally, a little
about steel and iron and other manufactures, and I trust a good
deal about the construction of railways, canals, docks, harbours,
and other works of that class."
This, we are inclined to think, is a very just estimate.
What Sir John did not know about the construction of
railways, canals, docks, and harbours was probably not
worth knowing. He followed, moreover, the results of
improved processes of manufacture, and knew exactly
how to turn them to engineering uses. He had the eye
of a skilful general thoroughly understanding the objec-
tive of his campaign, able to use to advantage every arm
of the service, and well aware of the necessity of securing
for his lieutenants the best scientific intellects of the
profession — in a word, a great organiser, with sufficient
scientific knowledge to make his organisation thoroughly
efficient.
As Fowler has himself told us, M. de Lesseps was
at pains to explain to his friends that he was not an
A GEEAT OKGANISEK 191
engineer, yet the Suez Canal will in all future ages
be associated with the name of Ferdinand de Lesseps,
and rightly so. Fowler, unlike Lesseps, was a com-
petently trained engineer ; yet, if we are not mistaken,
they both owe their great positions to the same
qualities. Sir John Fowler's achievement and the im-
portant place which he undoubtedly occupies in the
engineering history of the nineteenth century, are due
not so much to his high scientific acquirements as to
his practical powers of organisation. In framing the
panegyric of Sir John Fowler, there is no need to
depreciate the value of correct theory. No one has
insisted more emphatically on the paramount import-
ance of scientific training, but the impartial bystander
will not fail to notice how frequently high scientific
attainment is combined with a certain futility of
purpose, and how requisite to the business of this in-
dustrial age is the organising mind. If we wished to
claim a scientific pre-eminence for Sir John Fowler, it
would be a pre-eminence in that most difficult and as
yet unformulated science, the management of men and
of finance. This quality of intellect is necessary for
successful achievement, and, in its highest forms, it is
certainly rare. Mere scientific knowledge of the brute
forces of nature is by no means rare, it can be hired in
many markets on honourable yet by no means extrava-
gant terms.
Sir John Fowler is a type of a class of men whose
importance is apt to be under- estimated. They move
through life in comparative silence, they make them-
selves no great addition to our knowledge, but if we
may use the hackneyed words in this connection, si
monumentum quceris circumspice.
192 PKESIDENT OF THE INSTITUTION
The subdivision of labour in the service of mankind
has proceeded far. Invention is one thing, the. utilisa-
tion of invention is another. To be inventive and to
be practical is not always given to one and the same
person. We have all heard and laughed at the story of
Lord Ellenborough, who removed his banking account
when he heard that his banker (Samuel Eogers) wrote
poetry, but there is a certain justification of this view
to be found in the sober reality of history. The purely
inventive and scientific genius is not always the safest
guide, though undoubtedly its work is essential to
human progress. We need not go to the length of
Lord Ellenborough, who declared his intention of seek-
ing out the stupidest man in the world of banking as
the fittest to be entrusted with the safe custody of his
cash, but we do obviously require the sifting process of
stolid, unimpressionable common sense, if the world at
large is to enjoy the full benefit of the progressive
victories of science. The selection of what is practic-
able, and the rejection of what is impracticable, are
functions which require very high qualities, and every
day they are becoming more imperatively necessary.
This is the useful work which is performed by the
class of men of whom Sir John Fowler was an eminent
type.
CHAPTER VIII.
ME. FOWLER AND GENERAL GARIBALDI
AN EPISODE
AN interesting but not important episode in Mr.
Fowler's life may now be narrated. It will serve
to mark the fact that he now enjoyed a European
reputation, and will display his diplomatic adroitness,
a quality to which he owed much of his success.
The inundations of the Tiber in the Roman Campagna
and in Rome itself had for long been a subject of
anxiety for Italian statesmen. Disastrous floods had
occurred in the year 1870, and numerous projects
were put forward for the reclamation of the Campagna
and the relief of Rome from the danger of floods and
malaria.
Naturally, the standing, perennial problem of the
Italian engineer interested Fowler. When visiting
Rome in 1871 he discussed the question with Count
C. Arrivabene. This gentleman, under date June 19th,
1873, sent him, by the hand of Baron French, the head
of a well-known financial firm in Rome, a proposal for
getting up a company, of which Mr. Fowler was to
be the leader, for the drainage of the Campagna.
Nothing appears to have come of the matter, but the
subject became urgent when in 1875, after the entry
of the Italian Government into Rome, General Garibaldi
o 193
194 MR FOWLER AND GENEEAL GARIBALDI
took his seat in the chamber as a deputy, and announced
his intention of devoting himself to this great national
work. The task which had baffled the power of
imperial and papal rulers naturally challenged the
energy of the democratic liberator.
The General's advent in Eome was not without its
anxiety for the government of Victor Emmanuel. It
was so far a matter of congratulation that the hero
renounced all intention of making experiments on the
constitution, but it was soon found that his schemes for
social improvement, though benevolent and magnificent,
were not always consistent with sound and business-like
engineering. His plans, indeed, were at first on the
largest and most ambitious scale. Like all true vision-
aries, the great Italian patriot prided himself on being
a practical man.
" I am only a practical man," he told the correspondent
of an English newspaper. " I am resolved to push forward the
project, as soon as it is approved, into immediate action. What
I want is that a beginning should be made, and if I only see a
trench opened I shall know that the work is begun."
There is no more dangerous character in the world
than the popular hero declaring with his hand on
his heart that " something must be done," and with
only a very vague notion as to what that something
ought to be. The General's authority with the people
of Italy was of course unbounded. His behaviour to
the monarchical authorities had been magnanimous,
and the government was bound to treat his proposals
with the greatest deference.
The engineering problem may be stated briefly as
follows. The Koman Campagna is a large triangle with
THE EOMAN MAESHES 195
its base, some 88 kilometres in length, resting on the
sea. The apex of the triangle is stretched towards
the Apennines, and consists of a surface of about
1,000,000 acres; a great part of this area is unin-
habitable for many months of the year. The Tiber
winds through this plain and overflows into the swamps
and marshes. The whole region is only about nine feet
above, and some of it even below, the sea level.
The ingenuity of Mr. Lecky has discovered that the
malarial dangers of the Koman Campagna have conferred
on Italy one great boon, namely, that its parliament
can hold no prolonged session, owing to the un-
healthiness of the summer season ; but otherwise the
swamps of the Campagna have been considered deplor-
able evils. This condition of things, moreover, was
obviously capable of improvement by wise engineering
measures.
The plan of the General is thus described by a well-
informed correspondent. It was to divert the waters
of the Tiber into the bed of the Anio for about a
couple of miles, as far as the Nomentano Bridge, and
then to cut an entirely new and navigable canal, which
would serve also as a collector to the whole system
of lateral drains down to the sea. The old bed of the
Tiber was, in the General's first conception, to be filled
in, though later he proposed that it should still be
preserved, controlled by locks which should regulate
the flow, and enable the antiquary to explore the bed
of the river for the lost treasure of earlier times.
There is, perhaps, nothing impracticable in all this,
except the question of cost. This to the "practical
man " who wished something to be done was a detail,
but it was a consideration not to be ignored by Signor
196 MR FOWLER AND GENERAL GARIBALDI
Minghetti, the Prime Minister, and his financial
advisers.
The idea seems to have been that the engineering
works to be agreed upon should be carried out by an
association of adventurers, whose remuneration should
consist in grants of reclaimed land, and in sums raised
in the form of taxation or loans by the Government
and by the municipality of Eome.
Among the persons interested were the Duke of
Sutherland, the Prince Torlonia, and other dis-
tinguished capitalists. At this point Mr. Fowler was
asked to intervene, first by the Duke of Sutherland,
whose friendship with Garibaldi had induced him to
interest himself in the problem, and then by the
Italian Government. Sir John Fowler's account of
the transaction may be given in his own words :—
" Before leaving Cairo I received a telegram from Rome to
the effect that a serious difference of opinion had arisen
between the Italian Government and Garibaldi with reference
to the mode of dealing with the River Tiber, so as to prevent a
repetition of the injury to health and property which had
resulted from a recent flood ; and I was invited by both parties
to go to Rome and endeavour to reconcile the differences.
" On my arrival I called on M. Minghetti, then Prime
Minister of Italy, to obtain information regarding the question
upon which my assistance was requested. He informed me
that the matter was very serious indeed, for Garibaldi's position
at that time was one of great influence, and it would be
dangerous to have a quarrel with him, and yet at the same
time it was impossible to entertain his views.
" I then called upon Garibaldi, who at once said, ' I am a
pessimist ; the Tiber is a danger to Rome, and therefore I say
remove the Tiber.' This was rather startling, and I explained
that being an engineer, I could only give an opinion on facts,
COUNTING THE COST 197
and that I should first desire to ascertain what would be the
cost and consequence of removing the Tiber as he proposed
from Kome to Tivoli. Garibaldi assented to this as being
reasonable, and I consequently lost no time in obtaining
engineers from the Italian Government to make surveys and
sections over the ground, and an estimate of the cost.
" This was done as rapidly as possible, and I called upon
Garibaldi to state the result of my investigation of his sug-
gestion, which practically involved a cost of about nine millions
sterling and an equal amount for compensation. I went
through the details with him, and he frankly admitted that
I had demonstrated the impracticability of his scheme, and he
was much obliged for the trouble I had taken."
Sir B. Baker, who was present at some of the inter-
views of his chief with General Garibaldi, has described
how they were received by the Italian patriot. His
young wife, like a peasant girl, sat in the room sewing,
but took no part in the conversation. The General,
who received all and sundry, was much exposed to
tourists and adventurers of all kinds. He said to
Fowler, jokingly, that he was much taken with the
proposal of some American engineers, wrho were pre-
pared to deviate the Tiber for no other payment beyond
the antiquities which they expected to discover, " while
you," he said, turning to the English engineers, " say
the thing will cost millions." Mr. Fowler succeeded
to some extent in inducing the old man to hold aloof
from the irresponsible crowd which he admitted all too
readily to his confidence.
The General took a very gracious leave of his
visitors, and presented Fowler with his photograph
and autograph.
Before leaving Eome Mr. Fowler addressed the
following letter to General Garibaldi by way of
198 MR. FOWLER AND GENERAL GARIBALDI
summing up the situation, and with the purpose of
at least delaying the General's decision. It displays,
we venture to think, considerable diplomatic skill on
the part of the writer, and is a good instance of
Fowler's adroitness in the management of men.
"ROME, March 2Sth, 1875.
"DEAR GENERAL GARIBALDI, — Before leaving Rome for
England to-morrow morning, I wish to send you a very short
note of the result of my visit to Rome.
" Our excellent friend, the Duke of Sutherland, communi-
cated to me in Cairo by a telegraph from Rome that he thought
I could be useful to you in your great undertaking, and that
you would be very pleased to see me on the subject.
" It has been a great gratification to me to come to Rome
and to see you and examine this great question.
"At the special wish of the Duke of Sutherland and the
Duchess, I called upon Sir A. Paget and S. Minghetti.
" I found Minghetti's disposition excellent. He told me he
had no wish or views as to the mode of accomplishing your
objects, that he entirely sympathised with them, and was pre-
pared to give hearty assistance to any proposal which did not
exceed a total amount which did not embarrass the finances
of Italy.
" He immediately gave me all documents in his possession
which supplied information, and expressed a hope that the
Duke of Sutherland would be induced to co-operate with you
in your work.
"Having the advantage of your general views and the
documents supplied to me, I next examined the valley of the
Tiber, the marshes on each side of the Tiber, and the site
of the proposed harbour, in which I was accompanied by Mr.
Wilkinson.
"My previous knowledge of Rome and the neighbourhood,
and my attention having been called to sanitary Roman im-
provements in 1871 and 1873, greatly facilitated my present
proceeding.
MR FOWLEK'S LETTER 199
" Since the consolidation of Italy into one kingdom, and the
adoption of Rome for its capital, the rectification of the Tiber
and the diminution of malaria have become not only an Italian
but an European necessity.
"The result of my careful studies during the present visit
is, that rectification of the Tiber and the improvement of the
marshes on each side, which you have taken up with so much
enthusiasm and general sympathy, are perfectly practicable
and reasonable work, and may be adequately supported with
prudence by the Italian Government.
"The rapid fall and physical conditions of the Tiber are
favourable to works of rectification for the prevention of
injurious floods in the city.
" The remedies for this evil naturally divide themselves into
two parts.
" 1st. A diversion of the Tiber from the city.
" 2nd. An improvement of the Tiber in and near the city.
" The object desired can be accomplished by either of these
means.
"Until the profile or section was prepared of the diversion
of the Tiber from Rome, no opinion could be formed upon it.
"This section has been prepared during the last few days,
and has been furnished to me. The work of excavation in-
volved is great, but it presents no peculiar difficulties beyond
its magnitude.
" No borings have been taken, and therefore an approximate
estimate only can be made at present. I greatly fear, however,
that under the most favourable circumstances the total cost
of such a diversion, including the filling of the old channel,
drainage, purchase of property, and expenses consequent upon
its construction would be beyond that which could be prudently
entertained.
" I do not think it possible that this total cost can be less
than from five to six millions sterling.
"Of the reputed advantages and disadvantages of the
removal of the Tiber from Rome, in respect to its navigation,
current of air from the mountains, and otherwise, I will not
200 ME. FOWLER AND GENERAL GARIBALDI
speak, because on such subjects others are better authorities
than I am.
" Fortunately you are not dependent for a satisfactory solu-
tion of the question upon a complete diversion. The documents
placed at my disposal, and my own examination, show me that
by means of a small diversion of the river below Rome and
proper works of rectification in and above Rome, your object
can be adequately accomplished.
"Of the value of drainage and cultivating the marshes on
each side of the Tiber I have the highest opinion. The work
is simple and easy, and certain in its results of improved value
and sanitary condition.
"Of the harbour — I see no objection to Mr. Wilkinson's plan
of breakwaters ; it would, however, be prudent, in my opinion, to
have boreholes put down through the alluvial deposit of the
Tiber on the site of the proposed breakwater, so as to estimate
with greater accuracy the probable settlement of the blocks.
"The marshes should be drained and made healthy before
the port is opened for business, or its character as a safe and
proper position would be at once destroyed.
" I have no statistics to enable me to form an opinion of the
commercial necessity for a harbour, but those will be in your
possession.
" On the whole, my dear General, my suggestion would be to
have the studies of the diversion completed, including borings
and other information, and a trustworthy estimate prepared by
competent Italian engineers on whom you and others can rely,
discarding those who would mislead you by imaginary quanti-
ties and prices.
" If the result of this investigation produces much more
favourable features than my approximate estimates present
with existing information, then extend the inquiry into all its
consequences and have full designs and estimates prepared.
" If, on the contrary, you find the cost and consequences to
present insuperable obstacles to its realisation, let a complete
scheme of rectification be prepared of the existing Tiber through
Rome.
ME. WILSON'S EEPOET 201
"In either case I would advise that the work of improving
about 100,000 acres of the Tiber marshes be included in the
project of Tiber rectification.
" I am of opinion that a satisfactory plan of Tiber rectifica-
tion, on the basis of preserving the course of the river through
Eome, including the reclamation of the marshes I have de-
scribed, could be carried out for a total cost of two millions
sterling, and within a period of three years.
"Allow me, in conclusion, my dear General, to express my
gratification in seeing you upon this great and useful question,
and to assure you that the Duke of Sutherland and myself will
always be happy to render you any assistance in our power.
"Believe me always,
"Yours very truly,
1 1 JOHN FOWLER."
Though leaving Eome in March, Fowler was kept
advised as to negotiations. A trusted member of his
staff, Mr. W. Wilson, was deputed by him to report
upon the various schemes which were brought forward.
In a letter to Mr. Fowler, written in May, 1875,
Mr. Wilson describes his labour in making himself
conversant with something like a dozen rival schemes.
Garibaldi had apparently got the estimate made as
Fowler had recommended. The General, Mr. Wilson
reports, had yielded to the feeling of the people of
Home, who objected to a diversion of the Tiber from
the city, and, indeed, was altering his plans from day
to day. A new plan received by Mr. Wilson the
very morning of his report proposed a complete diver-
sion from the junction of the Eiver Anio, round the
eastern side of Eome, joining the Tiber again near
St. Paulo, but the old course was to be preserved,
and the flow of the river was to be regulated by locks.
The flood- water was to run down the course of the
202 MR FOWLER AND GENERAL GARIBALDI
new diversion, while the river in its ancient channel
would be maintained at its ordinary level. The cost
of this was estimated by Garibaldi and his advisers
at 75 million francs. In Mr. Wilson's judgment it
would cost at the very least 100 million francs.
Both of these sums were beyond the amount which
the Italian Government was prepared to advance, and
the scheme itself was open to many serious objections.
The principal of these was, that, at normal times, a
division of the water of the river would not insure
the proper scouring of both channels, and would in
fact aggravate rather than improve the insanitary con-
dition of the river.
Fowler's success in inducing the General to con-
descend to estimates, secured a delay and saved the
State from the undue precipitancy of the hero.
The sequel seems to have been that a commission
examined some nineteen plans, rejected those which
involved a deviation of the river, and selected one
which proposed to clear the existing channel from
numerous obstacles, such as old bridges, piers, and
other superfluous masonry, to wall and embank the
river within the city to a height of 55 feet, to rebuild
certain bridges with larger openings, to give to the river
a minimum width of 109 yards, to construct main drains
or sewers on each side of the embankment. This plan
had the approval of Mr. Fowler. The Government
adopted the recommendation, and the works were com-
menced in 1876.
CHAPTER IX.
A PBOPOSAL FOR A CHANNEL FERRY
MR FOWLER, as we have already seen, became
a pioneer in the matter of Metropolitan railway
communications, and, as we shall have occasion to
relate, he was the chief engineer of the Forth Bridge,
a structure wrhich entirely revolutionised the railway
communications of Scotland.
All Mr. Fowler's projects, however, did not end in
success, and the following narrative of his failure to
revolutionise the passage to France will not be without
its interest.
The history of the International Communications
Bill, by which it was sought to authorise a Channel
Ferry, deserves for its own sake a somewhat full notice.
Though rejected for the time being, it still remains the
most feasible of the methods proposed for facilitating
the journey from England to the Continent.
The Bill was brought before a committee of the
House of Commons on April 29th, 1872, and naturally
Mr. Fowler, as the engineer of the scheme, was a
principal witness in its favour.
We condense the following account of the proposal
from the evidence which he offered in its support.
The subject of better communications with the Con-
tinent, he said, had engaged his attention from 1864
203
204 PEOPOSAL FOR A CHANNEL FERRY
onwards, and in the following year, 1865, surveys of
the coast of France and England were made by himself
and by his able coadjutors, Mr. Abernethy and Mr.
W. Wilson, with a view of selecting a suitable place
for the accommodation required. Dover was selected
as the best starting-point on the English side, but
the promoters could not at this time come to terms
with the Admiralty, who objected to certain inter-
ferences with the Admiralty pier. The negotiations
were renewed in 1867, but without success. In the
meantime Mr. Fowler was applied to by persons who
proposed a tunnel.
"I came to the conclusion," he said, "that at all events
it was premature. Yes, and I declined to take the responsibility
of adopting it. I thought it very much better that we should
begin with something which at all events we could see our
way to the end of. It may lead, in the course of fifty or a
hundred years, to a tunnel being seriously proposed, but we are
certainly not ready for a tunnel yet." " The bridge," he goes
on to say, "is too ridiculous to discuss, as the bridge would
consist of a number of piers, which would be rocks dangerous
to navigation."
There remained, therefore, nothing but his own plan,
which he shortly described :—
" My proposal is parallel to a tunnel in this sense, that it
is a continuous communication. The very essence of my
proposal is that carriages, goods trucks, and mails should
be carried across without breaking bulk ; that would be accom-
plished by a tunnel, but it will be accomplished much better,
in my opinion, by proper boats."
The proper boats which he had in view were boats of
about 450 feet long, of 6,000 tons burden, and 10,000
horse-power, capable of carrying a train of sixteen
carriages, the weight of which was estimated at a little
WATEK STATION AT DOVEE 205
over 100 tons. The carriages were to be run bodily
on to the ferry boat and conveyed " without breaking
bulk" across to France. The railway companies
already possessed the necessary powers for building
such boats, but parliamentary powers were required
for alterations in the harbour at Dover and for the
construction of what he called a water station. The
details of the changes at Dover Harbour need not be
particularly described, as operations conducted by the
Government on a much larger scale are now in progress.
The general result was that a new harbour of 95 acres
was to be obtained, which would secure perfectly still
water for the use of the ferry boats.
The water station was to be fitted with hydraulic
lifts, wharves, and the necessary apparatus for the
passage of the trains to the steamer. The hydraulic
lift was to be one half the length of the vessel, and
trains of the London, Chatham, and Dover, and
South Eastern Companies were to be put on the lift
as they arrived, and run on board the boat side by
side. Sir William Armstrong had been consulted
about the machinery, and undertook to provide lifts
that would complete the operation in a minute. Mr.
Fowler, more cautiously, thought that five minutes
would not be an unreasonable delay. Some extension
or alteration of the companies' lines was necessary for
the project. The London, Chatham, and Dover were
at first favourably disposed, but the South Eastern,
whose interests were identified with Folkestone, and
with the tunnel scheme of which its chairman was
the principal promoter, were strong opponents of Mr.
Fowler's scheme. The Harbour authorities of Dover
also opposed before the committee of the House of
206 PEOPOSAL FOR A CHANNEL FERRY
Commons, but their opposition was withdrawn when
the Bill reached the Lords.
Satisfactory assurances of support had been received
from the French Government through M. Thiers, and
there seemed reasonable ground for hoping that the
concession necessary for constructing the corresponding
landing-stages on the French coast would be given.
Mr. Ward Hunt, a leading member of the Conservative
party, and some time First Lord of the Admiralty and
Chancellor of the Exchequer, gave evidence that in' the
year 1869 he and Mr. Fowler had an interview with
the Emperor of the French, and received considerable
encouragement. War broke out between France and
Germany in 1870, and negotiations came to an end.
Favourable assurances had also been received from
M. Alphonse de Rothschild, chairman of the Great
Northern Railway of France. The negotiations were
renewed, through the instrumentality of Mr. Philip
Stanhope, one of Mr. Fowler's assistants, in 1871, when
M. Thiers, the President, more or less directly renewed
the favourable assurances of the French Government.
He stipulated, however, that the necessary concessions
for beginning the work on the English side of the
Channel should first be obtained before it w,ould be
possible for him to approach the French Chambers on
the subject. A variety of considerations seemed to
point to Andrecelles as the place of debarkation for
the ferry steamers on the French coast. From the
nature of the case, therefore, the promoters were unable
to produce any definite agreement binding the French
authorities to accept and forward their proposals.
The estimated cost of all these works was stated by
Mr. Fowler to be £890,000.
PASSES THE COMMONS 207
To make a long story short, the committee of the
House of Commons found the preamble of the Bill
proved, but added the condition that the powers
applied for should cease and determine if within a
given time (two or three years were mentioned as the
proper limit) the necessary concessions were not ob-
tained from the French Government.
In July of the same year the Bill was brought before
a select Committee of the House of Lords, consisting
of Earl Belmore (Chairman), Earl of Moreton, Earl of
Ilchester, and Lords Eaglan and Lawrence. Much the
same ground was travelled over. It appeared, how-
ever, that in the interval the South Eastern Bailway
had to some extent succeeded in detaching the London,
Chatham, and Dover from their support of the Bill.
It was also brought out that, in the early stages of
the promotion, negotiations had taken place, and, as
it was hoped by the promoters, an agreement reached
between the International Communications Company
and the authorities of the South Eastern Kailway.
The arrangements, however, broke down on the
question of terms, and the promoters' counsel made
much of the point that practically both the companies
had agreed to the principle of the Bill, and that their
opposition, as now shown, was merely prompted by the
question of terms. Against the Bill it was urged that
the promoters
" stand entirely alone, without friends in the English railways,
without friends in the French railways, and without any
assurance from the French Government that the conditions of
their undertaking will be satisfied, also without any prospect
of any person whatever finding them the capital necessary
for this undertaking."
208 PKOPOSAL FOR A CHANNEL FERRY
In vain the counsel for the promoters drew glowing
pictures of a brilliantly lighted water station, invalids
in search of warm climate conveyed to the sunny south
without risk of exposure from the weather, the
abolition of sea-sickness, the vast increase of traffic,
and improved harbour at Dover for craft of all kinds,
and the entente cordiale between our island and the
Continent strengthened and confirmed. In the ruth-
less official language of the report, the committee-
room was cleared ; after some time the counsel and
parties were again called in, and the chairman, Earl
Belmore, announced that
" the committee have given a careful consideration to this Bill,
which they consider one of considerable importance, and the
majority are of opinion that the preamble is not proved."
The value of all this " consideration " is not perhaps
enhanced, when it is added that the committee was
evenly divided, and that the adverse decision was
adopted on the casting vote of the chairman.
Two coincidences which arose in the course of the
evidence, personal to the subject of this biography, are
worth noting. One was the evidence given as to the
steam ferry which conveyed goods trains across the
Forth from Granton to Burntisland, a service destined
to be more or less entirely superseded by the Forth
Bridge. Secondly, the evidence of Mr. Kobert George
Underdown, general manager of the Manchester,
Sheffield, and Lincolnshire Eailway, who was called
to show that the transit between New Holland and
Hull, a distance of three miles, was conveniently man-
aged without a steam ferry proper, by transhipment of
passengers and goods from the train to the ferry boats.
THE SCHEME KEJECTED 209
The construction of the piers and landing-stages for
this service was, as already pointed out, originally made
by Mr. Fowler, and it was a high, if not altogether an
agreeable, compliment to quote the success of the works
at New Holland against their author, when he was ad-
vocating a new departure for the improved convenience
of a steam ferry proper.
The following letter of condolence from Lord Arm-
strong (then Sir William Armstrong) was received and
preserved by Mr. Fowler : —
"NEWCASTLE, July 11, 1872.
" MY DEAR FOWLER, — I am afraid you had an uneasy day of
it yesterday. There are days on which all things seem to go
wrong, and this seemed to be the case with you yesterday.
What on earth could make the Lords' committee declare against
your preamble ? It struck me when I was present that Lord
Lawrence had some adverse crotchet in his head — something,
perhaps, about the supposed impolicy of encouraging a French
harbour available as a basis of invasion opposite Dover. How-
ever, I can now only wish you success another year."
Mr. Fowler felt this repulse very keenly. Com-
mittees of the Houses of Parliament are not obliged
to give reasons for their verdict, and they are generally
wise enough to avail themselves of this privilege.
Undoubtedly the hostility of the two English rail-
ways, whose passengers were to be the beneficiaries of
the improved Channel service, would have done much
to hinder the successful working of the scheme.
Mr. Fowler retained his belief in the practicability
of a Channel Ferry to the end of his life. In March,
1882, he contributed a paper to the Nineteenth
Century, in which, after giving a curious account of
the several proposals which had been made for the
210 PEOPOSAL FOE A CHANNEL FERRY
more convenient crossing of the Channel, he sets out
his own alternative scheme as
" a project for the establishment of huge floating railway
stations which would traverse at a high speed the distance
between the English and French coasts. That is to say, a
Continental train from Victoria or Charing Cross would run
into a first-class station at Dover, and then straight ahead
on to and between the decks of a very large ferry steamer."
He then describes the enlargement of Dover Harbour
and the hydraulic lift, and concludes :—
" Two lines of rails were to have been laid along the lower
deck of the steamer, on which the passenger carriages would
remain in complete shelter, with platforms, waiting and re-
freshment rooms, and the other conveniences provided in
stations ashore. On arrival in harbour on the French side,
the train would be disembarked by the aid of hydraulic
appliances, and proceed direct on its way, the total saving
of time being estimated at not less than two hours, as
compared with that occupied under the present arrange-
ments. ... In default of better arguments it has been
attempted to ridicule the system by suggesting that as
passengers would probably leave their carriages during the
Channel crossing, the transit of the carriages would merely
be for the accommodation of the umbrellas and rugs, which
would be their sole occupants. Such an argument hardly
needs refuting, for it would apply equally to the whole
system of through carriage accommodation, which has been
so laboriously built up during the last quarter of a century
in England and abroad. . . . Experienced railway managers
are fully alive to the value of providing through carriages
and all possible conveniences for competitive traffic, and
they know how trifling a matter turns the course of a
traveller along one railway or another. It would, I think,
be difficult to exaggerate the comfort which would result
from the ability to secure a seat at Charing Cross or Victoria
KEJECTION NOT FINAL 211
Stations, especially where ladies and invalids are concerned,
with the knowledge that there will be no disturbance, no
hunting about at Calais or Boulogne in the dark, and no
separation of family parties, or necessity to mount into car-
riages with unknown occupants."
The two railway companies — the London, Chatham,
and Dover, and the South Eastern — have now come
to terms after a long period of rivalry. As we have
already pointed out, the competition which the
railway manager has to overcome is the disposition
of the Queen's subjects to remain in their own homes.
This competition is especially strong when the bourn
to which the railway desires to convey its passengers
is beyond seas. Now that the harassing and wasteful
competition between the two companies has come to
an end, we may hope that they will some day find
it to their interest to increase the facilities for foreign
travel, in which case we may hope to hear again of
the Channel Ferry Scheme.
CHAPTER X.
EGYPT
THE year 1869 brings us to an event in Fowler's
life which he himself regarded as most important,
namely, his first visit to Egypt. On May 8th, 1869,
writing to congratulate his father on his birthday, he
alludes to his visit of the past winter in the following
terms : —
" My own visit to Egypt has been an important incident of
the year, and I have been very glad to know you were able to
take interest in my wandering and in the sights I witnessed.
A thorough exploration of Egypt such as I was able to make
must always constitute one of the most important, if not the
most important event of any man's life.
" The feeling that you are treading on the same ground, that
you are on the same wonderful river, and that you are amid the
same scenes which in the old days of Abraham and Moses we
have always felt to be one of the most interesting pictures of
Bible history, must always leave an ineffaceably vivid impression
on the mind of those who have been privileged, as I have been,
to see the spot itself."
That a man of Fowler's full and varied experience
should regard his visit to Egypt — a visit not in the
first instance undertaken with any professional object
—as perhaps " the most important event of his life," is
not a little remarkable; yet the sentiment is, we believe,
thoroughly genuine and characteristic of the writer.
212
HIS POWER OF ENJOYMENT 213
The exclusively professional interests of his earlier
career have been noticed. By the year 1868 his
position as one of the foremost in the ranks of English
engineers was assured. Except in regard to some great
works, yet to be conceived and executed, his ambition
as an engineer was satisfied. Thenceforward he was
inclined to allow his exuberant energy and restlessness
of intellect to employ itself in other channels as well
as in the business of his profession. Unlike many men
who have made their own fortunes, Fowler had no
inclination to despise the pleasures which find accept-
ance with an educated leisure class. His faculty for
enjoyment was, in this sense, very catholic. He had,
moreover, no sort of liking for Bohemian society and
Bohemian amusements. The immense amount of
thought and money that is devoted to sport in this
country is evidence, if evidence is required, that the
majority of men who are in a position to indulge
their whim, anticipate great enjoyment from its
pursuit. Fowler thought so too, and when we come
to record his life at Braemore we shall find that even
fastidious critics pronounced him to be a good sports-
man. So, too, with regard to the company which he
kept. Fowler's success in life legitimately gave him
an introduction to the best society. He naturally
adopted the intellectual independence of tone which
characterises the real aristocracy of talent and achieve-
ment. He was entirely without what the French call
mauvaise honte, a social infirmity for which we have
no adequate expression. His real kindness of heart
furnished him with a courtesy of manner which, though
neither courtier-like nor conventional, had the advan-
tage of being obviously sincere. At the same time
214 EGYPT
his conversation was trenchant and forcible. No one
could accuse him of being a sycophant. This rugged
independence of character was quite compatible with
the fact that he made no concealment of his gratification
in being honoured with the friendship of the great.
He belonged of right to the aristocracy of talent and
achievement, and he had a genial pleasure in the
position which his abilities and industry had secured
for him.
To this catholic yet discriminating choice of interests
and recreation, we are disposed to refer the almost en-
thusiastic interest which he was henceforward to take
in the history and destiny of Egypt.
From Fowler's education and other antecedents, one
would not naturally have expected that his mental
activity would have been inclined to pass much
beyond the absorbing engineering problem of the
railways and irrigation of Egypt. His mind, however,
was responsive to the pleasure found by the scholar
and the antiquarian in a study of the ancient history
of that wonderful country. We do not mean to imply
that he ever became an expert in Egyptian lore, but
his attitude towards the scholarly study of antiquity
was one distinctly of homage. Occasionally the
exponents of modern scientific arts are disposed to
throw ridicule on the vocation of the scholar. Fowler
had none of this arrogance. Scholarship, a pursuit
which had called forth the enthusiasm of so many
of the best minds, could not be altogether absurd.
He adopted, therefore, in this respect, the verdict of
the learned, and endeavoured, with considerable
success, to view the question from their standpoint.
Egyptology is in scholarship, it might perhaps be said,
AEPJVAL IN EGYPT 215
what salmon fishing, or deer stalking, or yachting is in
sport. Fowler was no doubt more assiduous as a sports-
man than as an Egyptologist, but his interest in all these
pursuits and his love of distinguished society were due
to his genial eagerness to enter into those pleasures of
life which are approved by the most distinguished and
most cultured section of English society.
It was in this spirit in 1869 he first visited Egypt.
He had been suffering from the effect of overwork,
when, to use his own words,
" a kind and valued friend, the Duke of Sutherland, proposed
to me the pleasant remedy of a visit to Egypt with himself
and a few friends, including Professor Owen. An expedition
to the nearly finished Suez Canal was a part of the programme,
and a trip up the Nile under very favourable conditions was
suggested as probable. The temptation was beyond my power
of resistance, and I gladly agreed to be one of the party."
On board the P. and 0. paddle steamer Nyanza,
on which they embarked at Marseilles, they found
the Egyptian statesman, Nubar Pasha, whom Fowler
learnt to regard with respect and esteem. The landing
at Alexandria was accomplished in state on the
" splendid barge rowed by twelve sailors in uniform,"
which was in attendance for His Excellency Nubar
Pasha. In his letters, in a journal kept while in
Egypt, and also in a lecture delivered at Tewkesbury
in 1880, he describes with considerable minuteness
the details of his daily life. Our selection of quota-
tions is compiled in the first place with the object
of illustrating the holiday aspect of his journey. We
reserve for a later section a brief statement of the
professional services which he was invited to render
to the Government of the Khedive.
216 EGYPT
On arrival at Cairo he was carried off to the race-
course, where the sand, he remarks, is a poor substitute
for the springy turf of Old England. There he was
presented to His Highness Ismail Pasha the Khedive,
and invited to view the races from his stand. His
subsequent relations with Ismail were so important
that it seems worth while to preserve Fowler's record
of their first interview.
" Ismail Pasha, the son of Ibrahim Pasha, and grandson
of Mohammed All, was born December 1st, 1830. He is
slightly below the middle height, powerfully built, and with
very broad shoulders. His habitual expression is somewhat
heavy, except when interested during conversation, and then
he suddenly flashes a quick look upon you and shows by his
manner and by a few emphatic words that he has thoroughly
understood all you have said. There can be no doubt of
his intelligence, or of his uniformly courteous manner. On
these points natives and strangers of all ranks are in accord,
however much they may differ with regard to his administra-
tion of the country. At the races he seemed greatly amused
with the betting, which he encouraged, and when his sons
lost their bets to him (which they generally did) he insisted
on being instantly paid in gold, and chaffed the young losers
most unmercifully. He made rather a large bet with a
Captain Butler, who had brought over a mare from Malta,
rode her himself, and beat the Khedive's best horse and
best jockey. The great Pharaoh was evidently not free from
human susceptibilities, for he showed unmistakable signs of
annoyance when he lost the race and the bet." " On this
occasion," adds Mr. Fowler, " I was introduced by the Khedive
to M. de Lesseps."
An early visit was of course made to the Pyramids.
After reciting their dimensions and the most probable
dates of their construction, he continues :—
* Tewkesbury Lecture, delivered in 1880.
THE PYEAMIDS 217
"As an engineer who has designed and constructed large
works, I was naturally much interested in examining the
Pyramids, statues, and temples of Egypt, with special reference
to their construction, of which we have heard so much during
the last twenty years. The first impression on the mind when
you come into their immediate presence is that of magnitude.
You are positively oppressed with this feeling, especially with
the Pyramids of Ghizeh, the Temple of Karnak at Thebes, the
statue of Barneses at Memnonium, and the rock temples at
Aboo Simbel. Further examination leads you to appreciate
and admire the evidences of elaborate and mature design,
which are at least as remarkable as the magnitude. Lastly,
you find granite, porphyry, alabaster, and other stone of
sizes almost unmanageable, which must have been brought
great distances by land and water under difficulties nearly
insuperable.
"Let us first consider the Pyramids of Ghizeh. The main
body of the work is built of blocks of nummulitic limestone
quarried on the spot. The two large Pyramids (Cheops and
Chephren) were originally faced with fine-grained limestone
from the Toorah quarries, of which covering nothing now
remains except near the top of the Chephren Pyramid. The
third Pyramid of Mycerinus was faced with granite brought
from Syene. In the interior of the Great Pyramid are
passages, chambers, and sarcophagi formed of polished granite
and porphyry, of design and workmanship well worthy of the
present time; and in the tombs near the Pyramids are also
varieties of granite, porphyry, and alabaster exquisitely worked
and polished.
"The ancient Toorah quarries, which furnished the stone
for the covering of the Pyramids of Cheops and Chephren,
are on the opposite or eastern side of the river, and a few
miles further south than the Pyramids. These quarries were
really large tunnels cut into the face of the mountain to
obtain a particular quality of stone, and extended for several
miles in length. The one I explored was entered by an
opening about 200 feet wide and 60 feet high, and was half
218 EGYPT
a mile long, with a branch of considerable size for admitting
daylight. So distinct are the marks on the rock face, that
it is easy to conjecture the size and form of the tools which
were used, and the sharpness of the marks indicates, beyond
all doubt, that the tools must have been of some very hard
metal. The stones cut from these quarries appear to have been
of equal size, and of the exact form required to fit the angle of
the Pyramid and each other.
" After the stones had been prepared, they were conveyed
down and across the river, and from thence up to the
Pyramids, on a causeway specially formed for the purpose.
They were then fitted with great nicety, without mortar,
upon the two Pyramids, polished, and finally inscribed with
hieroglyphic writing. These covering stones have long since
been conveyed away and used in the buildings of Cairo, but a
few fragments have been discovered and preserved.
" The extent and character of these quarries, Pyramids, and
temples of a very ancient, if riot prehistoric world, being
such as I have described, I found it hard to comprehend
how persons could bring themselves to suggest the formation
of a flat slope of sand round the Pyramids as the means
by which they were probably constructed. From numerous
hieroglyphic inscriptions we have the certain knowledge that
when these works were built Egypt possessed men of science,
philosophers, painters, and sculptors, as well as architects,
and that the architects who were entrusted with the design
and erection of Pyramids and temples were the most noble and
distinguished men of the period.
"These facts seem to be quite forgotten, and also the
common-sense inference that before such works as the
Pyramids of Ghizeh and the Temple of Karnak could have
been conceived by a Pharaoh or designed by an architect,
earlier and simpler designs necessarily preceded them, and
that architects and builders became gradually educated in
methods of construction, as well as in principles of design.
It is true that we have no record of the metal of which
their tools were made, and very little of their constructive
ANCIENT ENGINEEKING 219
appliances, but we have abundant evidence in the works them-
selves to show that it would be well for us, in these days, if we
knew some of the tools they used and how they used them.
" The mutilated statue of Kameses at Memnonium, weighing
900 tons, was undoubtedly brought from the Syene quarries, a
distance of about 130 miles, either by a raft on the Nile, or by
the less probable way of a prepared causeway for the whole
distance ; by either plan, the operation would be regarded even
now as one of exceeding difficulty.
" A valuable piece of indirect evidence that the removal and
elevation of large stones could not in those days have been
very difficult to the builders is the fact that they are con-
stantly found in positions where they have no special value
either for appearance or structural strength."
Elsewhere, namely in the address given to the
Merchant Venturers' School at Bristol, 1893, he says:—
" In Egypt the student of mechanics has abundance of
problems on which to exercise his ingenuity. For instance,
given the evidence of appliances with which the Egyptians
were familiar (as described on the walls at Beni-Hassan and
other places), the size of the stones and their position in the
Pyramids and temples, especially the statue of Kameses the
Second, weighing 888 tons, brought 130 miles from Assouan,
then let it be shown in detail how the work was accomplished.
A good solution of this problem would be entitled to a first-
class prize at the Merchant Venturers' School."
Then, after referring to the discovery of Dr. Flinders
Petrie that the tool used for making the statues of
hard material (e.g. that of Chephren) was probably a
precious stone, about as hard as a ruby, set in a frame,
he declares his conviction that the works of the ancient
Egyptians
"were at least equal to the best works of the present day,
as regards (1) Workmanship, as shown in the polished sur-
220 EGYPT
faces and the almost invisible mortarless joints of the por-
phyry, syenite, alabaster, and basalt masonry in the passages
and chambers of the Great Pyramid. (2) Statuary, as appears
in the statues of hard material. (3) Mechanical Engineering
in the removal of vast numbers of huge monolithic masses
of rock over great distances and obstacles. (4) Architecture.
He must have been a splendid architect indeed who designed
the Temple of Karnak in the Plains of Thebes, with its avenue
of Sphinxes, its Pylons, its Propylons, its Obelisks, and its
Hall of Columns. It has been truly said that the Temple
of Karnak was the noblest work ever raised by man for the
worship of God."
There is nothing new in Fowler's pronouncement
on the engineering skill of the ancient Egyptians, but
it is interesting as the carefully worded verdict of an
expert who had devoted more of his attention to the
question of materials than probably any other engineer
of his time.
Fowler described this his first visit to Egypt as a
mixture of pleasure-seeking and work. After a few
days spent at Cairo he started with the Duke of
Sutherland, M. de Lesseps, Professor Owen, and other
friends for the Suez Canal, and on his return from his
inspection of the great work then on the eve of com-
pletion, he was honoured with an invitation to attend
the Prince and Princess of Wales on an expedition
up the Nile. In this he was accompanied by his guest,
Professor Owen, a friend of thirty years' standing. In
the course of the trip Fowler was requested to deliver
a lecture to the Prince and his suite on his recent visit
to the canal, but perhaps the best account we can give
of the thoughts which occupied the mind of the con-
valescent traveller will be by quoting from a letter
which he sent to a child friend.
LETTEE TO A CHILD 221
Fowler at all times was a great letter writer. "The
well-informed man," he says in his British Association
address, "is the man who knows a little about every-
thing and all about something." Another of his axioms
was, " Commit what you learn on any subject to
writing, it is the best way of remembering and testing
your knowledge." Some ideas of this sort may perhaps
explain his habit of writing accounts of the scenery,
history, geology, and other remarkable but well-known
facts connected with the country in which he is travel-
ling. These communications contain exactly the sort
of knowledge which would be possessed by the " well-
informed."
The following, attuned to the comprehension of a
child, seems a favourable specimen of his epistolary
style, and supplies a very interesting picture of the
practical man of science gossiping with a child on the
history of ancient Egypt : —
" ON THE NILE, MINIEH (200 miles above CAIRO),
" February 22nd, 1869.
" MY DEAR LITTLE AMY, — You will wonder when you see the
outside of the envelope of this letter who can possibly have
written you a letter with an Egyptian postmark upon it ; and
when you see the shaky writing, which a shaky, vibrating
steamer produces, you will turn to the signature at the end
of the letter, and then I hope you will recognise the name of
an old friend. And now, my dear Amy, as we are thus intro-
duced to each other, I should like to tell you a little of this
wonderful land of Egypt.
" In the first place, let me say that Egypt is remarkable as
being the newest, or last-formed land, and yet contains the
most ancient people known in the world.
" Let me explain what I mean. In England and France the
most recent rocks are the flint-bearing chalk rocks, but in
Egypt, long after these chalk rocks were in existence, three
222 EGYPT
different kinds of limestone came into existence, and rest upon
this chalk, and, as a singular confirmation of the correctness
of this geological order of things, the fossils found in this
Egyptian limestone correspond much more nearly to the exist-
ing forms of life on the earth and in the sea, than those found
in the chalk or older rocks.
" Of the antiquity of the people, we have most interesting
records in their temples, their Pyramids, and their now under-
stood hieroglyphics.
" The time of Abraham leaving Haran in the land of Canaan
to take his flocks to drink of the waters of the Nile, and to
escape the famine of his own land by dwelling for a time in
the rich lands of Egypt, cannot be determined with precision
by any reliable historical records, but we know that it was
at an early period of man's history, and that Abraham was the
origin and founder of the Jewish nation.
" In Egypt, however, we have perfectly trustworthy records
of events which happened long before Abraham entered Egypt,
and we have the knowledge that Egypt even then was a great
and powerful nation, with magnificent temples and palaces, and
with her equally magnificent but mysterious Pyramids.
" The earliest records we find in the nature of writing are
the hieroglyphics, which really mean sacred carving, and in the
first instance this system was used to represent animals, and
things themselves, but subsequently a kind of language became
formed and understood, and hieroglyphics were then used to
represent the names of what was intended to be communicated.
" It is curious that it was reserved for the present century
(about the year 1814) to discover the key by which Egyptian
hieroglyphics could be read, but you will easily understand
how vast a store of new and deeply interesting knowledge was
opened out by it in Egypt, where every temple, obelisk, etc.,
is covered with records which are mysterious now no longer.
"It is almost necessary to come to Egypt and see how
dependent the land is on the water of the Nile, and how good
and bad seasons are produced by the extent of the Nile floods,
to understand how that clever Joseph, when Prime Minister
PHARAOH 223
of Lower Egypt, took advantage of good seasons to change the
tenure of the estate and get possessed of the land for the king.
"You remember the land of Goshen, which the Egyptians
gave up to the Israelites because it was unfavourably placed
for irrigation by the Nile, and required great labour for its
cultivation. I thought of this description when I was travel-
ling through the land of Goshen, as it is called to this day,
and it is still a true description of it.
"Not far from Goshen I saw a real Philistine from Gaza,
which you remember was the scene of Samson's exploits. He
was rather a fair-complexioned man, but, like all his race at
the present time, an awful scoundrel.
" On crossing the Nile from Cairo to visit the Pyramids you
see the place where that kind daughter of Pharaoh found
little Moses and saved his life. I always greatly respect Moses,
and I hope you do the same. You remember he became
possessed of all the knowledge of the Egyptians, and was
probably a learned priest of Heliopolis, and then took the
lead in forming the new code of laws forbidding the worship
of Egyptian gods, and the animals they considered sacred, and
enjoined the worship of the one true and living God. After-
wards, when the Israelites had been cruelly used by the
Egyptians and their king, Pharaoh, Moses led them out of
Egypt, and in their flight from Pharaoh and his hosts they
crossed the Ked Sea and escaped, whilst the Egyptians, in
attempting to follow them, were drowned. Well, my dear
Amy, I have seen the place where this crossing is said to have
taken place (between the Bitter Lakes and the Eed Sea), and
I assure you that the rising of the south wind or the tide
would account for it by natural laws most perfectly, and we
know that God does His work and shows His power by natural
laws. I think I have sermonised sufficiently to you, but I
assure you it is impossible to forget the Bible when in Egypt.
The same ploughs, I believe, are used now as then, and you
see the Bedouins of the desert come to buy corn in Egypt as
of old, and in numberless ways, places, and things are you
reminded of portions of the Bible history of man."
224 EGYPT
The letter goes on to describe the writer's journey
with the Prince and Princess of Wales, an uneventful
voyage under the most favourable auspices on the
historic river with a distinguished and agreeable
company, among whom, besides the staff of the Prince,
were Sir Samuel Baker, Mr. Oswald Brierley the artist,
the Duke of Sutherland and his son, Professor Owen,
and Mr. W. H. Kussell of the Times.
To Fowler even this pleasure-voyage was not alto-
gether a time of idleness. He was busy in preparing
a letter on the Suez Canal, which he sent to the Times,
and in writing a memorandum on the irrigation of
Egypt for the Khedive. This last was presented on
his return to Cairo, and Mr. Fowler was requested
to delay his return to England in order that the
Khedive might have the opportunity of considering
and discussing the valuable suggestions therein con-
tained. Announcing this delay to one of his own
children, he again dwells on that continuity of history
which Egypt seems to suggest to every mind. The
famine in Joseph's time, he tells his child, was caused,
no doubt, by an inadequate flow of Nile water on
the land —
" And it will sound strange when I tell you that my present
visit to the Delta of Egypt (which produced the corn which
Joseph purchased) is to study the best means of improving the
irrigation of the land so as to prevent, as far as the power of
man can do, any farther scarcity or famine."
His letter for the Times, February 18th, 1869, on
the Suez Canal, was transmitted to that journal by
the Duke of Argyll, at whose suggestion it seems to
have been written. This letter is of some historical
importance, as preparing the way for a change of
VISIT TO SUEZ CANAL 225
public opinion in this country towards that great
enterprise.
His inspection of the Canal took place under the
personal guidance of M. de Lesseps, M. Voisin and the
other French engineers, and in the company of the Duke
of Sutherland and Professor Owen.
On the political aspects of the question, Mr. Fowler
was always at pains to defend Lord Palmerston's
opposition to the terms of the original concession made
to M. de Lesseps. This included, he pointed out, (l)
a grant of land along the whole length of the Canal
from the Mediterranean to the Red Sea, with powers
which amounted practically to political independence ;
(2) the absolute property in a fresh water canal from
Cairo, through the land of Goshen, to Ismailia and
Suez ; (3) the supply on the part of the Egyptian
Government of a minimum of 20,000 fellahin on what
was practically a system of forced labour.
These concessions were given to the company
by the Egyptian Government gratuitously; but the
award of the Emperor Napoleon, to whose arbitra-
tion certain objections raised by the English and
Egyptian Governments were submitted, obliged the
Egyptian Government to pay a sum of £3,686,000
to the company on its abandonment of the objection-
able part of the concession. Another 3J millions were
advanced by the Egyptian Government, and with
subsequent concessions and expenditure, first and last,
the canal, Mr. Fowler estimated, cost the Egyptian
Government some 20 millions sterling. The money
had to be raised on very onerous terms. Her
support, in fact, of the great international highway
threw on Egypt an intolerable burden, and, as Mr.
Q
226 EGYPT
Fowler has remarked on a later occasion, " laid the
foundation of the present (1880) large debt and injured
credit of Egypt." The benefit to Egypt, moreover,
from the construction of the canal was not in any way
commensurate with the burden which it imposed.
The party spent five days inspecting the canal
Fowler was busy with the engineering features of the
scene, while fossil bones in abundance from the excava-
tions were provided for the amusement of Professor
Owen. Among others was a shark's tooth from the
head of a prehistoric monster which must, said the
Professor, have been 60 feet in length. Nor was
the scientific picnic without its mild pleasantries.
M. de Lesseps produced, for the inspection of the
English savant, a piece of conglomerate in which sea
shells were embedded, and demanded a geological
identification. The Professor was equal to the occa-
sion, and with confidence assigned the specimen to the
formation Lessepsienne.
" One day," says Fowler, in his article in the Minster, " I had
a delightful gallop with Lesseps over five miles of a depression
in the desert, now occupied by the Bitter Lakes and forming
part of the Suez Canal Navigation, and he playfully reminded
me that I should never have another opportunity of a ride on
that spot. Lesseps," he says, " took special care to impress
upon us that he was not an engineer, and when I requested
an interview with the engineers of the canal to give them my
impressions of the work, he laughingly declined to be present,
as he said he did not understand the elements of engineering,
either theoretically or practically."
Fowler's relations with the projector of the great
canal were very friendly, and he witnessed with sorrow
the failure of his over - sanguine undertaking at the
THE POLITICS OF THE CANAL 227
Isthmus of Panama. Fowler attended the dinner
given in his honour at Stafford House by the Duke of
Sutherland, on which occasion Mr. Gladstone and Mr.
Disraeli were both present to show their respect for the
illustrious Frenchman.
"My last interview with Lesseps," Fowler says, "was in
Egypt, after the purchase of the Canal shares by England, when
he came up to me with both hands extended and said, ' Now,
M. Fowler, that your country has become partners with me, and
risked money in my canal, England shall share in its manage-
ment,' and I understand the promise was fulfilled." *
The great canal highroad from Europe to Asia was,
as Fowler was fond of pointing out, forced on Egypt
by the pressure of Western ideas. The idea of a free
waterway worked on commercial principles was one
altogether foreign to the Oriental mind. Indeed, the
passage and even the approach of foreign ships was
a thing to be prohibited rather than encouraged. In
this connection Mr. Fowler gives in his Tewkesbury
lecture the following translation of a
"Proclamation of the Sublime Porte, under date of the
year 1799 (1193 of the Mahommedan). Hatti Cherif,— We
do hereby order that no foreign vessel whatever shall approach
the Suez Coasts, either openly or secretly. The sea of Suez
is, moreover, the privileged route of the glorious pilgrimage
to Mecca ; to permit of free navigation to the above-mentioned
vessels, to favour and not prevent the same would be to betray
our religion, our Sovereign, and the whole of ' Islamism.'
" Consequently whoever dares to transgress this order will
inevitably suffer the merited punishment, both in this world
and in the next. It is therefore of the utmost importance to
the State and to our religion that this peremptory and irre-
vocable order be conformed to with zeal and promptness. Such
is our Imperial Will."
* Minster, February, 1895.
228 EGYPT
Time was when such a decree was not a mere brutum
fulmen. Much against its will, the Ottoman power has
had to abandon its exclusive policy. The very weak-
ness of its rulers as against Western encroachment,
coupled with the autocratic power which they exercised
over their own subjects, rendered these great con-
cessions to a body of foreign adventurers a possibility.
The increasing interest taken by Western powers in
the destiny of the far East made them insist on
allowing engineering skill to do its utmost to bring
East and West nearer together.
England, at the date of Mr. Fowler's lecture (1880),
owned 74 per cent, of the shipping that availed itself
of the new highway. This fact, and the great stake
which she has in her Eastern Empire, combine to make
the problem of the internationalisation of the Canal
one of vital importance to this country. Here again
the art of the engineer has created new problems for the
international jurist. Events have proved the incapacity
of the Ottoman power to fill adequately the part of
trustee to the international waterway which the great
Frenchman had pierced through its territory, and
have unavoidably thrust that vast responsibility on
the country whose interests are most largely at
stake.
The development of international law which has
arisen out of the opening of the Suez Canal is full of
important and hopeful augury for the future history
of mankind. Just as the appeal to private warfare
has been abandoned for an appeal to the constituted
tribunals of the land, so also in international affairs
the new values and new properties created by en-
gineering science are brought in case of dispute into
ENGINEEE TO THE KHEDIVE 229
newly constituted courts of arbitration, and give rise
to new applications of international law.
Fowler's interest in the Suez Canal was merely that
of an Englishman and an engineer, but his responsi-
bility for the other engineering problems of Egypt
was destined to be very large. The presentation of
his report on irrigation led to his appointment, in 1871,
to be General Engineering Adviser to the Egyptian
Government, an office which he held for eight years.
Apart from the Suez Canal, Egypt is in itself a
country created by the engineer, and the political
problem which the burden of empire has imposed
on this country may be summed up in the sentence
that England is under an obligation to give security
in Egypt for the work of the engineer. No more
striking example of the value of security in the history
of progress can be found than that which may be
gathered from the success, abandonment, and sub-
sequent resumption under happier auspices of the
engineering works on the railways and irrigation of
Egypt, instituted in the first place by John Fowler,
under the authority of Ismail the Khedive.
The history of modern Egypt, when it comes to be
written, will present an extraordinary and interesting
contrast to the chronicle of the Pharaohs. A great
civilisation is the product of the organisation of labour.
That organisation may be directed either by an absolute
arbitrary power controlling the movements of vast
armies of men, who act not on their own motive, but
are marshalled and controlled by the will of a master ;
or it may proceed from a society in which the parts
move on their own free initiative — in other words,
from the ordered harmony of economic freedom. The
230 EGYPT
first of these was the basis of the civilisation of ancient
Egypt, the civilisation emphatically of a slave power.
The Egyptian peasant, whose primitive methods of
irrigation Fowler describes, was little further advanced
under Ismail than he was under the ancient Pharaohs.
Fowler's attempt to bring to his aid the resources of
modern science broke down not from any error on the
part of the engineer or his methods, but because of
the insecurity of the personal despotism of Ismail.
The authority of an intelligent Pharaoh, no longer
hardening his heart against Western ideas, squander-
ing on one side with Oriental profusion his subjects'
money, and on the other promoting schemes of far-
reaching and wise beneficence, literally fell to pieces
when confronted with the incongruous demand of the
bondholder that debts must be paid, and that the
government of Egypt must be conducted on business
principles. Pharaoh, subjected to the rule of Lombard
Street, crumbled away, and with him went alike his
waste and his good intentions. It was the fortune
of Fowler to be the minister of an irresponsible
despot, whose foible was the promotion of beneficent
schemes of engineering. He saw the plans which he
had laid frustrated by the fall of his patron, and
lived to see them resuscitated again under the happier
auspices of the Pax Britannica.
The Pax Britannica is not identical with that
popular acquiescence in authority which is the result
of free political institutions, but any government that
is well administered, though not perhaps the best,
still leaves the organisation of society to be ordered by
the normal economic principles of personal liberty,
security of property, and the right of exchange.
THE "PAX BPJTANNICA" 231
Forced labour, the very basis of the barbaric power of
the Pharaohs, has come to an end. Arbitrary spoliation
under the title of taxation has been brought within
moderate limits. Property is secure and exchange is
free. These are the conditions, realised in Egypt under
the Pax JBritannica, which underlie the organisation
of the modern industrial cosmos.
The future of India and Egypt, protected by a
foreign domination from the ravages of famine, pesti-
lence and civil war, inhabited by peoples whose am-
bition is confined to the satisfaction of very modest
material wants, is likely to produce problems of the
deepest interest to the student of history. The question
of a surplus population in Western states seems to
be solving itself. The rate of increase there is already
less rapid, while the growth of wealth is certainly
accelerated. Higher standards of life and a keener
atmosphere of intellectual activity seem to act as a
restraint on the increase of a proletariate population.
The increase of wealth, the career open to prudence,
and the wider distribution of property have a like
restraining influence. In Egypt, and more notably
(as the system is of longer standing there) in India,
the responsibility of rule, the elevating tasks of in-
tellectual labour, notably the scientific work of
engineering, rest for the most part in the hands of
aliens. What elements are there in the situation
which can prove a substitute for the decimation of
the population by war, famine, and disease, those
"positive checks," which periodically arose anterior to
the arrival of British rule ? Better conditions of life
in a Western state in any given class are accompanied
by a slower growth of population. Increased wealth is
232 EGYPT
used not to produce numbers, but to improve condi-
tions. Among a subject population the same prosperity
shows a tendency to produce a different result.
The problem is one which the future only can decide.
In Egypt one of the keys of the situation is in the
hands of the engineers who are introducing the modern
science of engineering into this ancient land, a work
in which, under less favourable auspices, Fowler was a
pioneer.
It is interesting to record that Mr. Fowler, through-
out his Egyptian connection, was at considerable pains
to induce native Egyptians to qualify themselves as
engineers, and he befriended several young men who
came to this country for that purpose. He found,
however, an insuperable objection in the mind of the
Khedive to give them employment in responsible
positions. His Highness preferred to deal with Euro-
peans, remarking to Mr. Fowler, who pressed their
claims, that his own subjects of this class assumed for
themselves intolerable pretensions.
It is impossible to set out in detail all the work on
which Fowler in his capacity of Engineering Adviser to
the Khedive was consulted. Three subjects, however,
seem to be of the greatest importance : (1) the manu-
facture of sugar ; (2) the Soudan Kail way ; (3) the
irrigation of the Delta.
The first was an industry which the Khedive was
anxious to promote, more especially on his own estates.
At the direction of the Khedive much machinery and
plant had been purchased and erected. At Mr. Fowler's
suggestion Sir F. J. Bramwell and Dr. Letheby were
brought out from England to advise — the one on the
SUGAE 233
machinery and the other on the chemistry of the
manufacture.
The growth of sugar on a small scale for home use
is not a new industry in Egypt. The Khedive, how-
ever, conceived the idea that the industry might be
made important, and large new factories had been
opened at Minieh, Benisooef, Magaga, Beni Mazar,
Matai, and Ehoda. The best machinery was em-
ployed, and the result is thus summed up by Fowler
in his Tewkesbury lecture :—
"The sugar-cane of Egypt yields a very fair percentage
of crystallisable sugar, but is inferior in that respect to the
cane of the Mauritius in the proportion of 15 to 18. On
the whole, however, it is a question of considerable doubt
whether it would not have been more advantageous to the
Khedive and to Egypt to use the land for ordinary crops of
corn and cotton rather than for the sugar-cane."
Fowler was not responsible for the initiation of these
costly and on the whole unprofitable experiments, but
much of his time was occupied in the vain endeavour
to put the Khedive's speculation on a satisfactory
footing. It may be added that the prospects of sugar
cultivation in Egypt have since that date considerably
improved.
The question of the Egyptian railways, more par-
ticularly that of the Soudan Railway, is one of his-
torical as well as personal interest. The facts we shall
endeavour to narrate as far as possible in Fowler's own
language. In the printed edition of his Tewkesbury
lecture he writes as follows : —
"The discoveries in Equatorial Africa during the last twenty
years naturally led to the consideration of the means of
providing improved communication for the populace and
234 EGYPT
produce of those vast districts. The River Nile is an available
navigation, notwithstanding the interruption of the first
cataract, as far south as Wady Haifa ; beyond that point the
constant succession of cataracts make it practically useless,
and consequently all goods traffic and personal communication
are limited to camel caravan and the electric telegraph.
"The late Khedive instructed me to make the requisite
surveys and investigations, so as to advise the Egyptian
Government on the important question of providing the best
access to these newly discovered regions which had been
claimed as a part of the Egyptian territory, and the claim
had been unquestioned.*
" The result of two years' study was a report to the effect
that a light and cheap railway from Wady Haifa to Khartoum
(550 miles) would be of inestimable value to trade, government,
and civilisation, and that in a few years the traffic would
probably he sufficient to give a return on the outlay, but that
it would be undesirable to make any railway into Darfour.
"The importance of the railway to Khartoum cannot be
over-estimated, either for its immediate or remote influence.
It will furnish the cultivated land near the Nile with an
outlet for its produce, which at present it does not possess,
vast regions on both sides of the railway will have access
to it by camel routes, and, at its Khartoum terminus, the
Blue Nile for a short distance and the White Nile for a very
long distance will continue the communication into Central
Africa.
" After due consideration I was authorised to let the works
by contract and proceed with the construction of the railway,
called for convenience the 'Soudan Kail way,' and about 60
miles of its length have been completed and are available
for traffic. Unfortunately, financial difficulties have pressed
* Mr. Fowler always insisted that the Soudan was from geographical
considerations necessarily a part of Egypt. He wrote in this sense April,
1885, to Earl Granville, urging that no stable government in Egypt was
possible which did not include Khartoum and the Soudan. Lord Granville
wrote thanking him for his letter, and added, "your authority is very
great, but Khartoum appears to me to be a large order."
SOUDAN EAILWAY 235
so heavily upon Egypt that this great and useful work has
been interrupted, and will probably for the present be
abandoned. My surveys and reports, however, will remain,
and when Egypt has recovered from the effects of its wasteful
extravagance this work and others on which I have reported —
such as the Barrage — will be resumed and carried out.
" I must briefly describe the ceremony of the inauguration
of the Soudan Kailway, and the speeches delivered on the
occasion. On January 15th, 1875, in a violent gale of wind
and sand, the ceremony commenced. The Egyptian officers
engaged upon the work were in attendance, and soldiers were
placed instead of flag posts to mark out the line. Close at
hand were the labourers, with their tools and baskets. I
verified the levels and angles, and then the Cadi, the eccle-
siastical judge, and his assistant with a large assembly arrived,
carrying banners, on which were texts from the Koran. The
assistant read an address in Arabic, and while he was reading
a long piece of poetry incorporated in the address, Chabim
Pasha, the Governor, intimated to the orator that sufficient
had been recited, upon which the assembled company said
' Amen/ and prematurely ended the address. The Pasha then
responded in Arabic."
The history of Fowler's Egyptian employments is
the same strange mixture of Western and Oriental
ideas. The following, extracted from a report to His
Highness, describes the formidable nature of surveys
undertaken in the cause of railway construction.
The surveying expedition, which started in November,
1875, and returned to Cairo in August, 1876, contained
eight English engineers and a doctor — Messrs. Bakewell,
Simpson, Ensor, Chambers, Solymos, Murcott, Burr,
Meley, and Dr. Lowe — four Egyptian engineers and
officers in command of troops, thirty-six soldiers,
300 to 400 camels, 100 to 120 drivers, guides, and
others. In view of the subsequent lapse of these
236 EGYPT
regions into a state of cruel and fanatical barbarism,
it is noteworthy that the expedition was well received.
In the words of the report, "Every possible facility
was afforded to my surveyors for carrying on their
important work." A curious incident with regard to a
chronometer stolen from this expedition is worth
mention. After the occupation of Omdurman by the
Sirdar in 1898 this chronometer was found in a house
occupied by the Mahdi, as the makers, Messrs.
Frodsham and Co., relate with pardonable pride, in
excellent order and as good as new.
Fowler's diaries for his several Egyptian sojourns
are full of the discussion of large engineering projects.
Interviews with the Khedive were most satisfactory.
Never was there a potentate more desirous of his
subjects' welfare. Distinguished English engineers-
Armstrongs, and Kendels, and Bramwells — flit across
the scene. The railway was of course only part of the
larger question of communications generally. With a
view of facilitating transport of material great works
were instituted at the harbour of Alexandria, but
perhaps the most interesting problem before the
English engineer was the discovery of the best mode
of bringing shipping up the first cataract. The
following, extracted from the diary of 1872, a good
example of how the time was spent, deals with this
point.
On January 27th, 1872, a little before ten o'clock,
Mr. Fowler, accompanied by Sir William Armstrong,
Messrs. Eendel and Knowles, set out from Cairo
to inspect the first cataract. The diary describes
in some detail the carrying of a train across the Nile
at Boulag on a steam pontoon fitted with double rails.
A NILE JOUKNEY 237
The idea, mutatis mutandis, suggests Fowler's larger
proposal of a Channel ferry (1872). The pontoon,
however, he remarks, is inadequate for the growing
traffic, and a railway bridge is, in his judgment, a
necessity of the immediate future. The train stopped
next at Magaga to allow an inspection of the sugar
factory, and finally arrived at Minieh at six o'clock.
At Minieh next morning the journey was interrupted
by a message from the Khedive that he would receive
Mr. Fowler at the Minieh Palace that morning.
Admitted to the presence, Fowler stated that the
ferry at Boulag was inadequate ; that a bridge was
necessary, which would take two years in construction,
meantime that the passenger bridge, Kazr-el-Nil, then
nearly completed, could be temporarily used for trains ;
that the railway between Cairo and Alexandria was
sufficient, being a double line, and that a rail from
Ghizeh to Alexandria was in the meantime unnecessary ;
that the carrying power of the rail from Khoda to
Ghizeh might with advantage be increased by doubling
the line. His Highness then went into the question
of the Soudan Eailway. At 3 p.m. they started again
on the dahabieh Assouan, towed by a Government
steamer. They anchored for the night at Khoda.
Next day they inspected sugar mills, and continued
their journey at twelve o'clock, arriving at Daroot at
three, where a locomotive and carriage were waiting to
take the party to inspect the new sluice works on the
Ibrahimia and Yoosef Canal. Elaborate particulars
supplied by the resident Egyptian engineer are entered
in the diary. Next morning (January 30th) at six
the party started again, and arrived at Sioot, where
Mohammed Abusamra, resident engineer for this part
238 EGYPT
of the Ibrahimia Canal, called and arranged for an
inspection of works next day. The mouth of the
canal, made some four years previously, owing to the
absence of regulating sluices, had been much injured
by floods, and works were then in progress to remedy
this.
On February 1st the steamer arrived at Soohag,
where the local canal had to be inspected. It was dry
and dilapidated. At Thebes the party stopped for a
few days to visit the temples, and on February 6th
they were again ascending the river, and the engineers
were attacking the problem of the cataracts.
"During the earlier part of the day," says the diary,
"Mr. Fowler was engaged with Sir William Armstrong in
considering and discussing details of the hydraulic machinery
proposed to be used for the purpose of working an incline
from the lower to the upper part of the cataracts near
Assouan, and thus improving the navigation of the Nile ; also
in calculating the best means of working the river traffic
which will be created with the construction of the Soudan
Railway."
Next day, February 7th, they arrived at Assouan,
and in the afternoon Mr. Fowler took a small boat
as far as the lower part of the cataracts, and landed
near the Isle of Shellal. He then walked along the
east side of the cataracts, and passed the village of
Koroor, returning to the dahabieh by river.
"Next day, February 8th, he was occupied all day with
Sir William Armstrong in examining the various rapids along
the whole course of the cataracts, so as to select the one most
convenient upon which to locate the hydraulic wheels and
pumping station."
CATAKACT "INCLINE" 239
The following days were spent in the same manner,
and the ground for the proposed inclined slope was
surveyed and the gradients laid down.
After their return to Cairo, on February 23rd, Mr.
Fowler, Sir William Armstrong, and Mr. Kendel had an
interview with the Khedive at which Mr. Fowler
explained, with plans, the Cataract Incline, and the
system by which it was proposed to utilise the water
power of the rapids. He pointed out that the scheme
suggested would be efficient and economical in working,
and that, in point of cost and time required for execu-
tion, it was greatly superior to the alternative of a
canal, which would involve deep cuttings in the rock,
at an expense in money and time difficult to estimate
and perhaps prohibitory. Sir William Armstrong
showed plans of the water wheels, pumps, accumulator
and hauling machinery, and stated that 125 horse
power was required for working the water wheels,
and that this amount was procurable from one stream
in the rapids at all times of the year.
His Highness asked Mr. Fowler whether Nile
steamers and large boats could be carried over the
incline, and Mr. Fowler replied that all the present
Nile vessels could be so carried. His Highness wished
to know whether there was space provided for shunting
vessels, so as to repair them, if necessary, when hauled
out of the water. Mr. Fowler pointed out the area
destined for workshops and repairing yard, and further
showed the wharf provided by the plan, at which two
large and three small vessels could lie. Mr. Fowler also
called attention to the harbours of still water at the
end of each incline.
As to cost, Mr. Fowler stated that about £50,000
240 EGYPT
would cover the cost of all the machinery delivered
at Alexandria, and that £40,000 would be about the
cost of the masonry and other works requiring skilled
labour. The bulk of the incline embankment and
works could be done by unskilled labour and filled
in from material already at hand, and would require
about 1,000 men, if the Incline Eailway was to be
made in one year. Sir William Armstrong agreed
that it would take two Niles, or say two years, to
put the whole machinery into actual position and
operation. The first thing to do would be to build
workshops at Mahatta ; the machines in these shops
would be worked by the water power of the incline,
which would also, when not fully engaged in hauling,
pump water for irrigation.
His Highness was much struck with the proposal of
utilising the power of the rapids, and on learning that at
the first cataract it amounts to about 9,000 horse power,
at present wholly unused, and that the second cataract
was at least as powerful, his sense of economy was
shocked. He expressed his regret that such power was
not being utilised, and suggested that cotton might be
spun as well as grown in Egypt and irrigation much
extended, developments of enterprise which, Mr. Fowler
said, had already occurred to him.
Mr. Fowler proposed the construction of two trial
steamers for the traffic in connection with the incline,
which should be so designed and engined as to consume
half the coal required by existing steamers. His
Highness asked whether existing steamers could not be
furnished with improved engines, and proposed that Mr.
Fowler should examine the present steamers and select
one or two of the most suitable form for the purpose of
FUEL SUPPLY 241
being re-engined. He was also desirous that the two
engines should be able to burn wood, which could be
brought down from Wady Haifa at high Niles in large
quantities.
On the subject of coal Mr. Fowler expressed an
opinion that the samples furnished by M. Monnier
from a small shaft at Edfoo were not true coal of
the coal measures, and that such coal would not be
of use in its present condition for engines, though it
might be burnt as fuel of an inferior kind and would
produce gas. At the same time Mr. Fowler desired
to see M. Monnier in concert with Sir William
Armstrong and to report to His Highness after full
inquiry. His Highness stated that the price of coal
must if possible be reduced, and asked Mr. Fowler's
opinion of a plan by which His Highness was himself
to build steamers expressly for coal traffic, and to
import coal, at a loss if necessary, in order to reduce
the present freights. Mr. Fowler replied that it would
be well to use this plan as a menace, and resort to
it only on its failure as a menace. He received His
High ness's authority to confer with coal owners and
shippers in England with the view of procuring purer
coal at low freights. He also pointed out that it
was cheaper to import good coal at a fair price from
England than to import inferior coal at a gift, and
he stated that during his recent journey on the Nile,
he had noted the miserable quality of the coal supplied.
His Highness insisted on the importance of the
question of fuel supply, as bearing on the Soudan
Railway scheme. He said that the Soudan Eailway
must be made, but reminded Mr. Fowler that its
success depended in a measure on the cost of steam
242 EGYPT
transport on the Nile. In reply, Mr. Fowler reverted
to his proposal of improved marine engines, by which
in his opinion a saving of 50 per cent, could be effected
in fuel, whether coal or wood.
Mr. Fowler then referred to the necessity of im-
proving the cranes and dock machinery at Alexandria,
and obtained leave to confer with Sir William Arm-
strong for the erection of the necessary plant.
Mr. Fowler next remarked on the Nile deposit above
the first cataract, and suggested that, the wind being
constant in this district, windmill pumps might be
used for irrigation. Nubar Pasha, who was present,
said he had tried these without success, but Mr. Fowler
pointed out that better results might be obtained in
the narrower part of the valley, where the winds were
more constant.
A long discussion then followed as to the manage-
ment of the sugar factories and the private estates of
the Khedive generally, in the course of which proposals
were made for additional machinery, locomotives, and,
a point on which Mr. Fowler was insistent, an organised
staff of competent engineers.
It will be convenient to disentangle from other
contemporary and pressing matters the history of the
railway. A section of the railway was actually
completed, but before long the pressure of financial
distress brought the works to a standstill. A less
ambitious programme became necessary. Accordingly,
in January, 1877, we find Mr. Fowler conferring
with His Excellency Ismail Pasha Ayoub, Governor
of the Soudan, who had undertaken to complete the
line by means of the resources of the Soudan. At an
interview with the Khedive Mr. Fowler explained to
SOUDAN EAILWAY 243
His Highness that the result of his conference with
Ismail Pasha and Mr. Janson was that he was prepared
to advise His Highness to proceed with the works of
the Soudan Kailway, at such a rate of progress as would
be consistent with the financial resources of the Soudan,
as far as Hanneck, and that from Hanneck to Dabbeh
(a distance of 258 kilometres), the river, which was
there navigable at all seasons of the year, should for
the present be adopted ; that from Dabbeh the railway
should be made to Khartoum. On January 19th Mr.
Fowler and Mr. Duport had long conferences with
Ismail Pasha Ayoub, the Governor of the Soudan,
and agreed on a memorandum, which, with only a
few alterations, was subsequently accepted by the
Khedive : —
"(1) The superior control and responsibility to be vested in
the Governor of the Soudan.
(2) Existing financial obligations to be discharged by the
Egyptian Government.
(3) After January 1st, 1877, financial responsibility to be
on the Soudan Government.
(4) All the net revenue of the Soudan and Equatorial
provinces to be devoted to the construction of the
railway. Annual sum of at least £50,000 to be paid
to Bank of England.
(5) Mr. Janson or other chief engineer to be responsible for
direction of works, etc.
(6) Mr. Janson to keep Mr. Fowler, the consulting engineer
of the Egyptian Government, advised, and to send
lists of material required under the contract with
Messrs. Appleby.
(7) The entire management of all matters connected with
Soudan Eailway to be in the hands of the Governor
of Soudan.
244 EGYPT
(8) To avoid delay under above clause, the Governor of the
Soudan authorises the engineers, Mr. Janson and
Mr. Duport, Mr. Fowler's responsible representatives
in Egypt, to make selections and carry out requi-
sitions.
(9) The transit administration to forward material to
Soudan at once, on the certificate of Mr. Duport.
(10) For purchases and material and for salaries the
Governor of the Soudan is to provide to the extent
of £10,000 per annum.
(11) The telegraph to be under control of Soudan Eailway
administration.
(12) The Governor of Soudan to submit a yearly financial
report to Minister of Finance.
(13) Certificates for material required in the contract with
Messrs. Appleby to be signed by Mr. Fowler and
to be received by Minister of Finance as a full
discharge."
On January 26th, 1877, Mr. Janson saw the
Governor of the Soudan, H.E. Ismail Pasha Ayoub,
with reference to the railway, apparently for the last
time. During the first fortnight of February there
is record of numerous interviews with Colonel Gordon,
who " expressed himself very strongly and fully on
the subject of the cruel and unjust treatment of the
natives by Ismail Pasha Ayoub."
On February 14th at half-past eleven Mr. Fowler
called at the Palace by appointment, and found His
Highness the Khedive, Barrot Bey, Cherif Pasha,
Mr. Appleby, and Colonel Gordon. The scheme of
organisation for the railway was settled item by
item.
" It was explained by His Highness that Gordon Pasha
would be the Governor-General of the whole of the Soudan
GOEDON 245
from Assouan to the Equatorial Lakes, and would include
the Directorship of the Soudan Kailway in his duties.* The
alterations made were unimportant, chiefly the adoption of
Gordon Pasha as the Governor, and the railway administration
under General Marriott for the reception and forwarding of
Soudan material."
An appointment was further made for a meeting
between Colonel Gordon and Mr. Janson two months
hence
"to examine the site of the railway terminus at Hanneck,
and also the proposed site of the Kobe Bridge, with a view
to determine the question of making a bridge across the river
in the first instance, or postponing the bridge and working
a ferry provisionally."
Next day, February 15th, Mr. Janson was directed
to call on Colonel Gordon with a copy of Messrs.
Appleby's contract and the engineers' agreements.
Gordon would have nothing to do with the latter,
which concerned Mr. Janson and not him. He wished
to be troubled as little as possible with the manage-
ment of the railway, and said he intended to leave
the direction of the works entirely to Mr. Janson.
He could not at present say what sums he would be
able to devote to the construction of the line, but
he would give every assistance in his power. He was
going to Khartoum as quickly as possible, and would
then at once telegraph to Mr. Janson, who, after
making all necessary arrangements at Cairo, would
then hurry up to meet him at Hanneck and go over
the line with him.
* A letter from the Khedive to Gordon, February 17th, 1877, contains
the following instruction : " I direct your attention to two points, viz.,
the Suppression of Slavery and the Improvement of Communications. "-
BOULGER'S Life of Gordon, vol. ii. p. 3.
246 EGYPT
Gordon Pasha said he would remit to the Bank of
Egypt the sums necessary for payments to Messrs.
Appleby. The sums necessary for local expenses should
be sent to Wady Haifa, where the payments and dis-
bursements would be effected under Mr. Janson's direc-
tion. He was anxious that Messrs. Appleby's payments
and deliveries should suffer no delay, and understood
that Messrs. Appleby's position was a very painful and
embarrassing one. He would do all that lay in his
power to prevent any difficulties. He expected to leave
on Saturday morning for Suez.
On the 18th Mr. Fowler called on Gordon Pasha,
and at his desire furnished an estimate of the pro-
portion of Mr. Fowler's personal account due in respect
of the Soudan Eailway and Darfour surveys. On the
same day he received from Gordon advice of an order
on the Bank of Egypt for £10,000, to be applied in
payment of Messrs. Appleby.
The following characteristic notes from Gordon are
among Sir John Fowler's papers, and relate to this
period. The first, written on the day of the above-
described interview with the Khedive, bears witness
to the assiduity with which Fowler had pressed the
affairs of the Soudan Eailway on the sorely over-
wrought and newly appointed Governor.
"February Uth, 1877.
" MY DEAR MR. FOWLER, — I have received your letter, and
I throw myself on your indulgence to excuse me coming or
indeed discussing the railway question any further. I am
utterly ignorant of this railway for the present, and can form
no ideas on the subject, and will express no opinion on it.
The railway has gone on hitherto without me, and it can
surely do so till I get to Khartoum ; I will then give it my
LETTEES FKOM GOKDOIST 247
first attention and do all that lies in my power. I have so
many more things that need my attention, which are to me
more important than the railway is for the moment, that I
must attend to them.
" Eegretting very much that you are not well, and with my
kind regards to Mrs. Fowler,
" Believe me,
" Yours very truly,
" C. G. GORDON."
Two days later the new Governor, on his way to
his province, sent the following amende honorable for
the impatient attitude into which he had been
betrayed : —
" SUEZ, February l$th, 1877.
"MY DEAR MR. FOWLER, — I was indeed sorry I missed
saying good-bye to you and Mrs. Fowler. I wished much
to do so, for, owing to worry, etc., I fear I was not as courteous
to you as I would have been in my general quiet. I hope
you will therefore excuse me in consideration of my position
and the hurry I was in.
"I have sent an order to the Bank of Egypt for £2,600.*
I wish to clear up all these outstanding claims, for they are,
like hang-nails, a great trouble.
" With very kind regards to you and Mrs. Fowler, your
son, and Mrs. Ferguson,
" Believe me,
" Yours sincerely,
" C. G. GORDON.
"J. Fowler, Esq."
The more important matters requiring the attention
of the new Governor may be easily imagined, but as
everything in connection with the heroic defender
of Khartoum is of interest we make no apology for
* This sum was for salaries due to the Darfour staff.
248 EGYPT
the following, a copy of which is among Sir John
Fowler's papers : —
"CAIRO, February 17th, 1877.
"MY DEAR MR. GIBBS, — The firman is signed. H.H. has
given me the old province of Equator, the whole of Soudan,
and the littoral of Eed Sea. No one could be invested with
greater power. Finance, etc., are all in my hands, and, in
a word, I am astounded at the vast commission.
"It will be my fault now if slavery does not cease, but
of course I need time.
" Believe me,
" Yours sincerely,
" C. G. GORDON."
And so Gordon proceeded to his Governorship.
When he arrived there and began to count the cost
his enthusiasm for the railway, never very warm,
began to cool. The following letter, addressed to Mr.
Janson, the resident engineer of the Soudan Eailway
Works, shows his state of mind :—
"!N DESERT, November IQtJi, 1877.
"MY DEAR MR. JANSON, — (Such a pen and such ink!)
Camels do well enough for tramway draught. I used one
for drawing a cannon in Darfour, and they plough with them
in Turkey. Find out all about tramways, the inclines, curves,
etc., and any prices of tramway plant ; we will not need much.
I feel sure that H.H. will be glad of it. It will be a great thing
to utilise the Nile ; it is by far the simpler mode. A railway
is too exotic a plant to flourish in these countries. Do
not let Fowler put a spoke in the wheel, viz. stop this work,
which he will if he can. Said Pasha had a screw steamer
at Debba twenty years ago. If you have spare engine power
could you work a wire rope railway or tramway around the
rapids ? Next winter you must take the levels around the
rapids for the tramways by your officers at Wady Haifa.
I count on your putting the chain of steamers right up to
THE SEQUEL 249
Berber in 1878. Try and get Appleby to take (off?) 10 per
cent. If he does not I may have to let it go into the floating
debt list ! " Yours sincerely,
"C. G. GORDON.
"P.S. — I can get sleepers up along the river for the tram-
ways."
On February 4th, 1878, there is entry in Fowler's
diary of the receipt of " a long telegram from Gordon
Pasha explaining why he could not supply more than
£20,000 this year for material." Later in the same
month, at an interview with the Khedive, it was
agreed (February 21st, 1878), with regard to the
Soudan Kailway, that the whole question should remain
to be decided on Gordon Pasha's arrival ; and so for
the time being the work of constructing the Soudan
Kailway came to an end.
In the article in the Minster, from which quotation
has already been made, Fowler tells the sequel of the
story as follows : —
"The works of the railway duly proceeded, the whole
country was sanguine, and nearly one hundred miles of the
line were more or less finished. But the dark days were at
hand ; the Egyptian Government became subjected to a form
of financial restriction which gradually stopped all payments
to the Soudan Eailway, and although Gordon had sent down
contributions from the Soudan, ... he was finally compelled
to telegraph to me, on March 13th, 1878, that it was impossible
for him to provide funds from the Soudan alone, and in his
capacity of director he was obliged to order the works to
be stopped and the contract cancelled.
"A large sum of money was necessarily wasted in
compensating the contractors,* but this was a small matter
* An arbitration took place between Messrs. Appleby and the Egyptian
Government, in which Mr. Fowler was arbitrator. His award gave some
£78,000 to the contractors.
250 EGYPT
compared with the consequences which necessarily followed,
viz. the official abandonment of the country south of Wady
Haifa, with the Egyptian garrisons ; the attempted rescue of
the garrison by Gordon ; and the attempted rescue of Gordon
by Lord Wolseley.
" It would be too painful to dwell on these sad events, but I
cannot feel that the words of the Khedive Ismail, when I saw
him in London, some time after he was deposed, were altogether
without justification. 'Ah, M. Fowler, you and I were not
such fools, after all. If we had been left alone we should have
finished the railway to Khartoum for four millions of money,
and established permanent government; but instead of that
eleven millions of money have been uselessly spent and many
valuable lives sacrificed in a military operation, and the whole
of the country south of Wady Haifa abandoned to anarchy and
slavery.' "
He concludes with a tribute to Ismail's good qualities,
which ought not to be entirely overshadowed by the
impatience and extravagance which were the defects of
his character.
The ex-Khedive's view as to the strategical import-
ance of a railway hardly requires corroboration, but
it is interesting to observe that Lord Salisbury, speak-
ing on May 18th, 1899, on behalf of the Eailway
Benevolent Institution, dwelt on this aspect of the
subject at considerable length : —
"We live/' he said, "in a time of many industries, and
many industries have only a doubtful and precarious existence.
There is many a failing, many a doubtful prospect, but this
one thing is certain — that during the last half -century the
one industry that has pushed forward beyond any other is
the railway industry, and there is no prospect that its power
will diminish. I say that from my own point of view with
sound conviction, because in the Foreign Office we are par-
ticularly employed in considering what influence railway
IMPOETANCE OF THE RAILWAY 251
expansion has on the destiny of nations. By a tremendous
effort of railway creation we have recently conquered the
Soudan. No doubt the Sirdar wielded many weapons, and
no weapon less surely than that of his own splendid in-
telligence and skill ; but if you go out of that and ask what
material weapons he wielded, I should say he won by the
railway, and the railway alone — that railway which he built
at the rate of about two miles per day from Korosko, almost
now to Khartoum. That railway enabled him to succeed
where a far larger force, under great intelligence and with
great support, lamentably failed. I can imagine nothing more
likely to exult and satisfy the dreams of any railway engineer
than to think of what the Sirdar had in his hands. Think
of building a railway at the rate of two miles a day, across
country where there were no tunnels, where there were hardly
any cuttings, and no embankments, and where you had an
unlimited command of labour and no difficulties about money,
and, above all, where you had the use of the splendid skill
of Lieutenant Girouard, a lieutenant of French extraction in
Canada, a subject of the Queen, who is now the Eailway
Commissioner in Egypt, whose wonderful skill enabled him
to complete this railway with a rapidity and faultless exacti-
tude that contributed in no small degree to the splendid
success which his chief accomplished."
The works projected by Fowler and frustrated at
this time by the instability of Oriental rule, have, as
all are aware, been resumed under more favourable
auspices. A railway to Khartoum is part of Lord
Kitchener's plan for the civilisation of Upper Egypt.
The remainder of the letters of Gordon preserved by
Mr. Fowler relate mainly to questions of account.
The correspondence on this head winds up with the
following characteristic touch from Gordon. It should
be remembered that Fowler's anxiety about the
accounts was not solely on his own behalf. The
252 EGYPT
financial position pressed very heavily on contractors,
engineers, and the whole staff of Europeans employed
in connection with the railway : —
"ALEXANDRIA, January IQth, 1880.
" To J. Fowler, Esq., 2, Queen Square Place,
Westminster, S. W.
"MY DEAR MR. FOWLER, — I was tossed out of my place
so soon that it was not in my power to say a word about
anything. However, having to-day received your letter,
January 2nd, I have written the Khedive very strongly, and
sent your account, and in my letter I have said, 'Take care
not to offend a personage of your status.' It is not my fault,
therefore, if you are not paid at once. The best of it is that
they owe me a miserable £1,200, which, to spite me, they
will put into Floating Debt ! It is not the Khedive, but Riaz
(the dancer of Abbas Pasha) who does this.
" I hope to see you soon, but be kind, and do not ask me
to dinner, for I am ill. " Yours sincerely,
" C. G. GORDON.
"P.S. — Write yourself to H.H., and say it is a Soudan
debt, and H.H. may pay it."
One other letter from Gordon is added, though it
does not refer to the Soudan Eailway, but to a map
which Mr. Fowler had been at great pains to have
prepared.
"114, BEAUFORT STREET, CHELSEA,
"April 21st, 1880.
" MY DEAR MR. FOWLER, — I am very much obliged for your
kind present of the map, and your lecture, and for your kind
letter. Do not be vexed if I tried to obtain the map in
the way of trade, for (with the exception of the Darfour part,
which is defective) it is the best map that is published, and
I think you ought to let it be purchased. I gave the one
you gave me through Watson to the King of the Belgians,
who was much pleased with it. I think you might let it
J
•^»
/.
/<U^
X^-'C*— C-*-. o*V '"fVv*^/ . (S*<-+*&~* «x/-~^
+^*^~6^ -^ *^I* A-»-^-^-ey-c
<^.
FACSIMILE OF LETTER RECEIVED BY MR. FOWLER FROM THE LATE GENERAL GORDON.
x ^
_, X^
A SWEET WATER CANAL 255
be sold; as I have said, the Darfour part is incorrect, but
otherwise it is first rate.
"I will call on you in a few days. You ought, through
Rivers Wilson, to push your claim in Egypt. They have
enough money to make fresh annexations, and ought to pay
their debts of the Soudan. A letter from you to the Khedive
and one to R. Wilson would settle it.
" Believe me,
" Yours sincerely,
" C. G. GORDON."
One other of the projects of the Khedive Ismail
deserves notice in connection with the improvement
of communications in Egypt. He very soon became
alive to the fact that the Suez Canal — that great
work for which his country had undertaken such
heavy burdens — had diverted traffic from the port
of Alexandria and carried passengers past Egypt who
formerly had travelled through and even halted there,
thereby contributing to the prosperity of the land.
Egypt, formerly a great terminus, had been practically
reduced to the position of a wayside station off the
main route between the East and the West.
The Khedive, who, whatever his faults may have
been, knew most accurately the necessities and engi-
neering possibilities of his country, conceived the idea
of making an alternative Suez Canal via Cairo and
Alexandria. In 1883, on the occasion of some friction
between M. de Lesseps and the representatives of
British interests, Messrs. Fowler and Baker contributed
an article to the Nineteenth Century recalling the
Khedive's plan, and urged it on the British public as
one well worthy of their consideration.
"As ruler of Egypt," they say, "the Khedive, in laying
out an alternative Suez Canal, had in his mind the attainment
256 EGYPT
of three great objects: (1) to make Alexandria one of the
important ports of the world, and to establish docks for the
sea-going vessels at Cairo; (2) to provide an alternative
ship canal, by which the traffic would be taken through the
heart of the country instead of across an outlying desert;
(3) to provide high-level irrigation for the cultivated land
of Lower Egypt and means for reclaiming a large area of
desert and marsh land, at present of no value to the country."
During his official connection with the Khedive
Mr. Fowler had been called into consultation, and was
prepared to show how these various objects could be
attained. The proposal, as matured and set forth
by himself and Sir Benjamin Baker in 1883, was as
follows : —
" Eeferring to the map," the article states, " it will be
seen that the proposed canal runs from Alexandria to
Suez wd Cairo, a total distance of 240 miles. The Nile
divides the canal into two portions, which may be best
described separately. At Cairo the level of low water is
about 39 feet above sea -level, so there will be a current
down the two portions of the canal towards the Mediterranean
and the Eed Sea respectively. The rate of this current will
depend upon the quantity of irrigation water abstracted from
the canal, but will always be very moderate. Locks are
provided where the canal joins the Nile at Cairo, and basins
and docks for the accommodation of shipping. From the
basin on the left bank of the river the canal wends its way
by straight reaches and easy bends to Alexandria, a total
distance of 118 miles. At the 36th, the 66th, and the
85th mile locks are provided, as the fall from the Nile to
the sea would otherwise lead to a current of destructive
rapidity. An additional lock at the 31st mile will be worked
during high Nile. It will be seen from the map that for
the last 28 miles of its length the canal runs thro"gh Lake
Mareotis, and that the interference with cultivated land is
minimised.
CKOSSING THE NILE 257
" On the right bank of the river, the canal, leaving the
Cairo dock basin, follows approximately the general course
of the Ismailia and Sweet Water Canal to Suez, a distance
of 122 miles. Locks are provided at the 40th mile and at
Suez for use during low Nile, and in flood-time two locks
at Cairo and at the 22nd mile respectively would be brought
into operation. The works on the canal call for no obser-
vation, as they are similar in character to those on the
thousands of miles of canal already constructed in Egypt."
The crossing of the Nile by ships in transit from
Suez to Alexandria was to be facilitated by " regulation
works of some magnitude."
" The spot selected for the crossing is a little below Cairo,
where the two flood channels unite and form a single stream
of fairly regular and equal flow. Training walls and banks
are designed to confine the river to the permanent course
for a certain distance above and below the point of crossing,
and direct the scour so as to maintain the required depth
for the passage of vessels. A railway bridge is provided to
connect the lines on opposite sides of the river, and to serve
as a carrier for the traversing mooring to which ships would
be attached when crossing the Nile. The mode of procedure
would be as follows : A vessel, say from Suez, on arriving in
the Cairo basin, would be slewed round and passed through
the lock into the Nile stern foremost, with her bows pointing
straight up stream. A wire hawser would be attached to
the traversing mooring, and the latter would be hauled
across the railway bridge by fixed hydraulic engines at the
Cairo Docks, taking with it the attached vessel. On arriving
at the opposite bank the vessel would be in a position to
enter the lock to the Alexandria Canal bow first. There
is no cross current tending to embarrass the operations, since
the locks point sharply down stream, and the ships leave
the locks stern foremost and enter them bow foremost. . . .
From the experience gained in the working of the great
s
258 EGYPT
railway ferry near the same spot, it is estimated that ten
minutes will amply suffice for the warping of a vessel across
the river from one canal to the other."
Such a canal would, it is further urged, be most
valuable for irrigation purposes. The portion from
Cairo to Alexandria would supply water
"to irrigate without pumping the half -million feddans of
cultivated and cultivable land in the province of Behera,"
and the Suez portion of the canal would meet the irrigation
requirements " of about a million feddans in the provinces of
Charkieh and Dakalieh, and considerably increase the facilities
for irrigating a further area of a quarter of a million feddans
in Gallioub."
The expenditure required to construct this ship
canal, and to complete the barrage with the required
minor irrigation channels, is estimated at from 10 to
12 millions. The water rates alone would, in the
judgment of the engineers, give a handsome return
independent of the ship dues. The fresh water would
cleanse the ships' bottoms from marine growths, and
the route would be popular with travellers. It would
be at least a day longer than the Suez Canal route,
but the dues would be less.
" In conclusion," the engineers put it, " it may be said that
the question of the construction of an alternative Suez Canal
md Alexandria and Cairo resolves itself into this: Is it, in
a rainless country like Egypt, preferable to construct a sweet-
water canal running along a ridge, or to widen a salt-water
" ditch " lying down in a hollow ? and is it, as regards our
own country, preferable to have an alternative route for
ships through Egypt remote from the present one and under
our own control, or to be wholly dependent upon M. de
Lesseps and his successors?"
LECTUEE ON EGYPT 259
About the same time a series of articles appeared
in the Times setting out the desirability and prac-
ticability of having an alternative canal parallel to
that controlled by M. de Lesseps. These articles
succeeded in achieving one of the objects of con-
troversy. They made the adversary very angry.
Happily these differences have been composed, and
in the meantime we seem to be working smoothly with
the successors of M. de Lesseps ; but a project re-
commended by such a combination of practical and
scientific authority as that of the two engineers whose
names are attached to the above -quoted article is
well worthy of the attention of administrators and
capitalists.
To return to the other important subject on which
Fowler was consulted, namely, to the question of
irrigation. The following popular description of Egypt
taken from his Tewkesbury lecture will give a good
idea of the scene of these labours.
" Egypt," he says, " an exceptional country in every respect,
cannot be described in the usual manner by definite numbers
of miles in length and breadth. A homely illustration is often
better than a learned disquisition or an army of figures, so
I will ask you to imagine a large kite, with a long string
or tail, laid flat on a sandy beach, with its head washed by
the sea, and its tail extended straggling inland over the sand.
This will give you a good general idea of the form of cultivable
land of Egypt and the surrounding desert. As regards size,
you must suppose the head of the kite to be a triangle or delta
with equal sides of 150 miles, and the tail to be about 2,500
miles long, or nearly as far as from England to America, for
that is the length of the Nile up to the Equatorial boundary
of Egypt. The area of the body of the kite, which represents
the cultivated lands of the Delta and Lower Egypt, is rather
260 EGYPT
more than 2,500,000 acres, or, say, three times the area of
Gloucestershire. The string, or tail, represents the narrow
ribbon of cultivated land on each side of the Nile in Lower,
Middle, or Upper Egypt, which in area is about 2,000,000 acres,
or two and a half times the size of Gloucestershire. The area
of the whole is rather less than Wales, and the population,
without Kordofan and Darfour, about 6,000,000, or the same
as Ireland and 50 per cent, more than London. Thus you
see how insignificant in size and population is Egypt Proper
compared with the interest it excites. ... If there were no
rain in Gloucestershire, the only cultivated lands would be
those subject to Severn floods, and such other patches of
ground as could be irrigated by pumping water from the
Severn. It is thus in Egypt ; for in the words of Herodotus,
'Egypt is the gift of the Nile/ and except for the fertilising
mud in the waters of the Nile, the whole country from the
junction of the White and Blue Niles at Khartoum to the
sea would be one vast desert without a single green cultivated
spot. The amount of mud brought down by the Nile each
year, according to my investigations, is about 150,000,000 tons
or more than the whole excavations of the Suez Canal.
" So much for the mud, now for the water.
" The discharge of the Severn at Diglis Weir, during an
excessive flood, is 500 tons per second ; that of the Nile at
high flood is 10,000 tons per second. I have had occasion
to study both rivers very carefully, and I am able to tell
you that, on the average, the Severn discharges 3,500 million
tons of water per annum into the Bristol Channel, and the
Nile no less than thirty times that quantity into the Mediter-
ranean, or 105,000 millions of tons, sufficient to flood the
whole area of England to a depth of three feet.
"The value of this vast supply of water to the thirsty
soil under the hot sun and rainless sky of Egypt cannot be
over-estimated. When the first Napoleon was in Egypt, he
declared his determination, if he remained in the country,
to use every drop of Nile water on the land, and to permit
no discharge into the Mediterranean. He was quite right
IRRIGATION 261
in the principle which his words indicated, though he could
not have literally accomplished it.
" The most ancient work in Egypt for storing the waters
of the Mle was the famous Lake Moeris, situated in the south-
east part of the land called the Fayoum, which is practically a
rich oasis with one side joining the Mle Valley and the other
abutting on the Lake Birket-el-karon, whose waters are nearly
100 feet below the level of the Mediterranean. During inun-
dation the waters of the river entered into Lake Moeris by
means of a canal, and were retained by locks. At low water,
the gates were opened to irrigate the great plains of the district
in the neighbourhood of the lake."
In the same lecture he describes the primitive
methods of irrigation which it was part of his business
to supersede by more scientific methods : —
"First. The Natala, the least used, and only for raising
water to a small height, is worked by two men swinging a
basket by ropes.
" Second. The Shadoof is formed of two posts, about 6 feet
high and 4 feet apart, with a palm-tree pole placed horizontally
across the top ; to this a lever is secured by ropes, having at
one end a balance weight and at the other a leathern bucket,
attached by a long palm stick. The bucket is pulled down
to the water and filled, and the balance weight then lifts it
to the required height. If the river bank is high two or more
of these are used, one above the other, to raise the water to the
level of the land. The usual height of each lift is from 8 to 9
feet, and each man raises about 25 gallons of water per minute.
The hieroglyphics at Thebes represent the ancient Egyptians
working shadoofs of precisely the same construction as those
employed at the present day.
" Third. The Sakieh, or Persian wheel, consists of a vertical
wheel of about 20 feet diameter, and descending to the level of
the water is an endless rope ladder with earthenware jars
attached. The jars fill as they dip into the water, are drawn up
full, and when at their maximum elevation discharge into a
262 EGYPT
trough or channel from which smaller channels lead into the
lands for irrigation. The sakieh is worked by means of oxen,
or other cattle, attached to a horizontal wheel, which works by
cogs into the vertical wheel described."
A larger measure of irrigation had been inaugurated
on native initiation. This was the Grand Barrage of
the Nile, projected by Mehemet Ali, and completed
(so far as, before the completion carried out by Sir
Colin Scott Moncrieff, it can be said to have been
completed) by his successor Said Pasha.
"The object of this work was to back up the water of the
Nile to a certain level by means of weirs and sluices, so as
to supply irrigation water to the Delta without pumping. The
conception was a grand one, and the principle sound, but
the foundations and other details were insufficient, and the
work failed to accomplish the object of the designer. . . .
When the sluices fitted in the arched opening were first
closed, the water under pressure found its way beneath the
foundations, and, carrying sand with it, undermined and
endangered the whole structure. Practically, therefore, the
Barrage has been of comparatively little use, except as a bridge
for a roadway connecting the opposite banks of the river
with the Delta."
In the diary for 1872 there is the following note
on the Barrage made after an inspection in the
company of Sir William Armstrong and Mr. (now
Lord) Kendel, who were then with Mr. Fowler at
Cairo : —
"The Barrage is situated two miles below this, at the
southern point or apex of the Delta, where the Nile divides
itself into two branches, Eosetta and Damietta. This work
was commenced twenty-five years ago, and consists of a bridge
about 530 metres long, having seventy-one openings, over the
Damietta branch; and of a bridge about 465 metres long,
THE BAEEAGE 263
having sixty-one openings, over the Eosetta branch. The
width of the openings are all the same, being 5 metres wide.
The thickness of the pier 2 metres each. The width of the
roadway of the bridge between the parapets is 10 metres,
while the piers are 14 metres in length, that is, the piers extend
up stream 5 metres beyond the southern face of the archways ;
this extension of the piers forms the point of attachment of
the radial arms of the segmental sluice gates. The level of the
springing of the arches is 8 metres above low water, the road-
way being 12 metres above the same level. The level of the
top of the sluices when shut is 4 metres above low water.
'The radier/ or concrete foundation, is 32 metres wide and
3 metres thick, is enclosed between two rows of piling, and
extends the whole length of the bridge. The piles are stated
to be driven to a depth of from 8 to 9 metres below low
water. The level of the upper surface of the radier is 1*80
metre below low water. About three or four years ago, when
the sluice gates were closed so as to maintain a head of water
of about 3 metres, it was observed that two or three of the
arches near the left bank of the Eosetta branch slid in a down
stream direction about 6 inches, and settled to some extent
at the same time, producing serious cracks in the masonry;
and these arches have since then continued to move every
year to a slight extent. No attempt has since then been made
to maintain a head of water greater than 0*80 metre. Works
are now in progress to ascertain the extent of damage sustained
by the foundations, and the means that can best be taken for
their repair. Provision is made for the river navigation by
means of two locks of 12 and 15 metres wide respectively.
" Between these two bridges, which form a barrage, or
dam, across the branches of the river, and at the apex of the
Delta, is placed the entrance of a canal, which is 60 metres
wide at bottom, 7J metres deep, with slopes of 3 to 1. It
was made for the purpose of irrigating a large area of the
Delta, but in consequence of the failure of the barrage, by
which the required head of water cannot be attained, this
object has been but very partially fulfilled. The barrage over
264 EGYPT
the Damietta branch remains at present unprovided with per-
manent sluice gates."
"The completion of the barrage," says Mr. Fowler, in his
Tewkesbury lecture, "was one of the works which the late
Khedive most desired to have carried out. By his instructions
I made minute surveys and studies, including observations to
obtain the minimum flow of the Mle, and also made borings
to a considerable depth near the site of the barrage. These
borings penetrated through the Nile deposit into the original
marine sand and gravel, and were of considerable interest
beyond the object for which they were taken. Eventually
I drew up an exhaustive report, design, and estimate for the
whole work of rectification and completion, which proved
beyond doubt the practicability of the work, and its value
in largely increasing the revenue of Egypt at a comparatively
small cost. For the sum of about £1,500,000, the Nile floods
would be regulated, pumping dispensed with, serious damage
to crops rendered impossible, and about 600,000 additional
acres of land brought under cultivation. The design was
approved, and its execution would certainly have produced a
clear profit of more than £1,000,000 per annum, but un-
fortunately some delay took place and now financial diffi-
culties have postponed it sine die."
The great difficulty of the engineering operation
was occasioned by the enormous weight of water which
had to be upheld, and the terrific force of the rush
of water over a vertical fall of several metres. A plan
had been submitted to the Khedive by Colonel Kundall
which proposed to rely on the existing edifice and to
protect the bed of the river by some species of paving.
This Fowler condemned as altogether inadequate. His
own proposal recommended the erection of a supple-
mentary curtain or wall, which should have the effect
of relieving some of the stress thrown on the barrage.
Mr. Gatget, a contractor largely interested in Egyptian
THE WORK ABANDONED 265
operations, had made a similar suggestion and had pro-
posed to build the wall or curtain above the barrage.
Mr. Fowler's design, however, was to place the curtain
wall below the barrage. This device would provide
what Fowler calls a "water cushion" which would
effectually break the force of the falling waters.
Like the Soudan Bailway, the work of Egyptian
irrigation has again been renewed. The barrage has
been restored by Sir Colin Scott Moncrieff and a staff of
engineers who had gained their experience of irrigation
works in India; and at the present time Sir John
Fowler's partner, Sir Benjamin Baker, is consulting
engineer to the Egyptian Government, which is carry-
ing out great supplementary works by making dams
across the Nile above and below Cairo so as to control
more completely the fertilising flow of the mighty
river, and a huge reservoir above Assouan to store
flood water for summer use.
All these important works, as has been already
indicated, were conducted during a period of financial
pressure. The diaries are full of indications of the
coming collapse. Under date February 2nd, 1877,
the situation is summed up with telegraphic brevity
in the following despatch sent by Messrs. Stephenson,
Clark and Co. to Mr. Fowler : ' * When do you expect
to get the money from the Khedive ? " No satisfactory
reply was forthcoming to this and similar inquiries.
Barrot Bey, interrogated by Mr. Baldry and Mr. Arthur
Fowler, referred them to the Minister of Finance and
the Minister of Finance referred them to the Khedive.
Messrs. Siemens and Co., according to an entry of
the 5th, refused to send further shipments till payment
was made. On March 4th Mr. Fowler had an interview
266 EGYPT
with His Highness, when, after suitable apology, he
opened up the question of accounts. His Highness
admitted the urgency of the situation, and very
graciously promised to mention the subject to the
Minister of Finance. Many of these sums were per-
sonal debts of the Khedive, but all alike they seemed
to drift into the "floating debt" about which Gordon
wrote with such grim humour. His Highness Prince
Hussein, the Minister of Finance, was next seen ; he
replied that, knowing Mr. Fowler so well and so long,
he desired to effect a settlement as quickly as possible.
11 He would confer with the Controller, without whom
he could make no decision." And so the evasive game
went on.
Other negotiations with this courteous but impecu-
nious potentate were more successful.
The diary records how Mr. Fowler co-operated with
the British Consul-General, Mr. (afterwards Lord) Vivian,
in obtaining the Khedive's leave to remove Cleopatra's
Needle to England. The obelisk, packed in a cylindrical
sea-going vessel designed by Mr. Benjamin Baker, was
brought to England, and erected on the Thames Em-
bankment by Mr. Dixon, the engineer and contractor.
The cost, much increased by salvage charges arising out
of a temporary abandonment of the vessel in the Bay
of Biscay, exceeded by about £7,000 the contract price
of £10,000 subscribed by Mr. (afterwards Sir) Erasmus
Wilson. The following, from a letter dated Cairo, March
10th, 1877, addressed by Mr. Fowler to Mr. Dixon, is of
sufficient interest to warrant reproduction :—
" You and all friends in England will, I am sure, be gratified
with the manner, as well as with the fact, of the consent of the
Khedive respecting the removal of the obelisk to England.
CLEOPATRA'S NEEDLE 267
" Mr. Vivian sends by post to-day the letter of Cherif Pasha
giving the consent of the Khedive, and his reply of thanks for
the consent and terms of it.
"These letters are so admirable that in my opinion they
should be published, which the Times will be glad to do, in
appropriate type and position.
" As to the best mode of obtaining the publicity, I would
suggest that some member of the House of Commons should
be requested to ask the Government if there be any objection
to their production of the correspondence respecting the
removal of Cleopatra's Needle.
" You can easily find a member who will willingly do this,
but, before doing so, see Lord Tenterden.
"I saw His Highness the Khedive this morning, and told
him of the telegram from London requesting me to thank him
for his very courteous assent.
" I must now tell you how immensely we are all indebted to
Mr. Vivian, Her Majesty's Consul-General, who has not only
given his influential assistance to bring about the decisive
result in the kindest possible manner, but has guided all
parties as to the proper manner of doing it, and has succeeded
perfectly. . . .
"I am glad to be able to congratulate you on the success
which has thus far rewarded your perseverance.
" I shall be in London in a short time, and you can always
consult me on engineering points."
Next year, 1878, Fowler, shortly after his arrival in
Egypt, had an interview with the Khedive, with regard
to which there is the following entry :—
" January 20. — After some remarks from His Highness as
to the financial advantages that would be obtained by the re-
construction of the barrage, Mr. Fowler said he told all his
friends who were interested in the finances of Egypt, that, in
any financial scheme for this country, proper provision should
be made for the improvement of the country and for public
268 EGYPT
works, such as the barrage, canals, and the Soudan Eailway.
His Highness said Mr. Fowler was quite right, and this would be
the only proper way of dealing with the question ; the Soudan
Eailway was a most important work with reference especially
to the Soudan and the Equatorial provinces, where there were
at present from ten to twelve million people shut out from
communication with the civilised world. The railway would
be the means of opening up and civilising the people, and
developing the commerce and industry of those regions.
" Later in the day Mr. Fowler showed His Highness a model
of the barrage, when, on being told that the cost would be one
and a half million, His Highness remarked that this work
would be the best guarantee the bondholders could have. Mr.
Fowler agreed, and His Highness added that it would be a
better guarantee than all the controllers and all the Caisse.
The new Administration had already cost the country in
one year £150,000, or about 10 per cent, on one and a half
million."
On February 5th Mr. Fowler records that he had
a long talk with Mr. Vivian, who said that affairs
were in a most critical state, as open war had broken
out between the Khedive and the bondholders, who
were disposed to make a point of the Khedive's
removal before entering into any further pourparlers
for a new arrangement.
At an interview with His Highness, February 19th,
Mr. Fowler explained
" that he proposed to return to England on the following
Saturday. His Highness said he wished to speak with him
on the subject of the barrage, and asked him whether he
had considered means for obtaining funds for that work.
Mr. Fowler replied that he had thought of this. He was
of opinion that provision should be made for this work
upon the occasion of the reconsideration and rearrangement
of the finances.
FINANCE 269
"His Highness said he considered the matter did not
concern the bondholders, and that they ought not to be
consulted in the matter. The proprietors of the land were
the persons interested, and the money required should be
obtained on their security."
At a further interview, two days later, February
21st, 1878, His Highness again dilated on the im-
portance of the barrage. He explained that two
million feddan then useless might be brought under
cultivation, and that the revenue might be immensely
increased in a short period. The barrage works, how-
ever, must be abandoned till some definite financial
arrangement had been made. His intention was that,
as soon as the financial difficulties were overcome, the
barrage should receive his first consideration, and be
carried out with Mr. Fowler's assistance.
Mr. Fowler pointed out that the existing financial
scheme was most unfavourable, not only for Egypt
but also for the bondholders ; that it made no pro-
vision for payment of the just claims of the
Administration, and none for the maintenance of the
existing public works upon which the welfare of
the country depends, nor for the construction of the
new ones of which the country stands in need. His
Highness said that Mr. Fowler was quite right, that
he himself had only the interest of the country at
heart, that he had asked the British Government to
appoint a suitable person as Inspector-General of Lower
Egypt, to whom he was prepared to give full powers.
This proved that he was acting honestly, although
many people were pleased to accuse him of bad
intentions and of hiding something. This invitation
to the British Government was sufficient answer to
270 EGYPT
such accusations, and he only regretted that they had
refused to accede to his request. He hoped they
would reconsider their decision. Mr. Goschen, he said,
was too much occupied with his own personal political
position at home ; he had adopted his scheme hastily
and without due consideration, and it was an evident
failure, and he was now endeavouring by calumny
and all means in his power to throw the fault of
that failure on His Highness.
Mr. Fowler pointed out that it was a very serious
thing for anyone in Mr. Goschen's position, and with
his financial reputation, to acknowledge the failure.
His Highness replied that the failure was evident,
and must be understood by everyone, but that Mr.
Goschen was a very obstinate man and was endeavour-
ing to cover his own failure by laying blame on His
Highness.
Mr. Fowler said he had known of His Highness'
request to the British Government to appoint an
Inspector-General, and in an interview he had with
Lord Derby, whom he knew very well, he had
recommended that if the Government did send any-
one in that capacity it should be a man of high
position, so that his advice might be of real service
to His Highness.
On February 23rd there is further mention of the
financial situation and of an interview with Mr.
Vivian.
"With regard to Mr. Goschen's scheme, Mr. Vivian agreed
with Mr. Fowler that it was an incomplete scheme, Neither
Mr. Vivian nor Mr. Fowler thought that the payment of tin-
next coupon when it fell due was possible, unless there was
money in the State chest unknown to the Controllers."
FINANCE 271
Mr. Fowler called afterwards on Barrot Bey, with
whom he had a general conversation. Mr. Fowler
expressed his opinion that even if a full and complete
arrangement was made to meet all debts (as well as
the bondholders) the country would even then be
able to bear the strain upon it, provided that the
finances were ably and skilfully handled.
To render clear the above expression of opinion, a
brief summary of the history of Egyptian finance is
required.
"The first general settlement of all liabilities, which was
effected on the proposals of Mr. Goschen and M. Joubert in
November, 1876, was of very short duration. The arrange-
ment, indeed, was a reasonable one, upon the facts as stated
to these gentlemen, but unfortunately the statement was
wholly misleading." *
On the breakdown of the Goschen arrangement some
new scheme had to be proposed. It was the view of
the Khedive, of Fowler, and of the illustrious Gordon
that the situation did not entirely belong to the
bondholders. The opinion of the Khedive was not per-
haps entitled to much consideration. The debt was his
autocratic creation, and his personal responsibility to
the bondholders was undoubted. Fowler was of opinion
that, with proper management, the bondholders might
be paid, and that provision might still be forthcoming
for the engineering development of Egypt; but that
in any case the development of the country should
not be postponed to the rights of the bondholders.
Gordon's position was not very different, though
naturally the expense of establishing good government
as conceived by him included less engineering than
* MILNER, England in Egypt, 2nd edition, p. 220.
272 EGYPT
in the estimate of Fowler. The Khedive, worried to
death by the demands of the representatives of the
bondholders — the financial cormorants, as Gordon
called them — in January, 1878, summoned Gordon to
Cairo from the Soudan to help him over his financial
difficulties. Gordon, in March of this year, agreed to
accept the post of president of a Commission of
Inquiry. With him was associated M. de Lesseps,
and the understanding was that the Commissioners of
the Debt, who were regarded as the representatives
of the bondholders, should not be on the Commission
of Inquiry. The story of this extraordinary trans-
action is told at length in Mr. Boulger's Life of
Gordon. Lesseps took little interest in the matter,
and surrendered to the pressure of the French Govern-
ment, which, with the other Great Powers, insisted on
the Debt Commissioners being placed on the inquiry.
The representatives of all the European Powers were
against Gordon and the Khedive. Gordon desired
to have money for the payment of salaries in arrear
and the redress of grievances, and even proposed to
obtain it by repudiation of the next coupon. " Ismail
was not equal to the occasion. He shut himself up
in his harem for two days, and, as Gordon said, 'the
game was lost.' '
The facts and the equity of the situation are very
much involved. With Gordon and with Fowler we
may doubt the right of a spendthrift autocrat to
pledge the credit of his impoverished serfs for pay-
ment of his debts. It is represented, however, and
forcibly enough by Milner, that the burden from which
Egypt was suffering was not the debt to the bond-
* BOULGER, vol. ii. p. 23.
ISMAIL DEPOSED 273
holders, but the incorrigible dishonesty of poor Ismail
himself. The first thing to be repudiated was the
ruler. This, as we all know, was done, but the
difficulty remained that there was nothing satisfactory
to put in his place. Ismail was, without doubt, the
ablest of his family. Even Gordon, who knew how
little he was to be trusted, regretted his abdication.
"It grieves me," he writes, "to think what sufferings
my poor Khedive Ismail has had to go through."*
Subsequent events seem to show that there was
justice in both views. When Ismail was removed,
after an interval during which progress was much
obstructed by the jealousies of the dual control, the
finances of Egypt under skilful management are
proving equal to the discharge of Ismail's debts and
to the gradual development of Egyptian resources by
works which in that country seem necessarily left in
the hands of the Government.
In 1879 Mr. Fowler returned to Egypt at the end
of January. The diary tells of conferences with
Mr. Kivers Wilson, M. de Lesseps, and with the
Khedive, with respect to his engineering undertakings.
The end, however, was fast approaching, and no satis-
factory arrangement could be made for the continuance
of the works.
Tuesday, February 18th, 1879, is marked as a
"famous day, from the 'demonstration' by Egyptian officers
to demand their pay at the Ministry of Finance, leading to a
slight assault on Nubar Pasha and Eivers Wilson, and the
appearance of the Khedive on the scene with troops, who
quelled the affair after a few persons had been wounded.
Nubar Pasha resigned next day. On the following days no
business was done, owing to the confusion and excitement."
* Story of Chinese Gordon, HAKE, vol. ii. p. 358.
T
274 EGYPT
Mr. Fowler enters in the note that he called on
Rivers Wilson and begged him not to resign, as he
would sacrifice himself and do no good by such a step.
On Wednesday, March 13th, Mr. Fowler wrote to
the Khedive a farewell letter. On March 15th he had
a farewell interview with the Khedive, at which that
courteous potentate made a great many handsome
speeches. And so John Fowler passed out of the
tangled skein of Egyptian politics.
The surveys of the Soudan and much other informa-
tion collected by Mr. Fowler were subsequently placed
at the disposal of Her Majesty's Government.
The London Gazette of Tuesday, September 1st,
1885, contains the following announcement:—
"Chancery of the Order of St. Michael and St. George,
Downing Street, September 1st.
"The Queen has been graciously pleased to give directions
for the following appointment to the Most Distinguished Order
of St. Michael and St. George : —
"To be an Ordinary Member of the Second Class, or
Knights Commanders of the said Most Distinguished Order,
John Fowler, Esq., C.E., for services rendered to Her Majesty's
Government in connection with the recent operations in Egypt
and the Soudan."
A question addressed by his son, the Eev. Montague
Fowler, to the Commander-in- Chief as to the precise
nature of Sir John's services has elicited the following
interesting reply :—
" COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF, January 12th, 1900.
" DEAR MR. FOWLER, — In 1884 Sir John Fowler most kindly
placed in my hands copies of the surveys he had made for a
railway from Assuan to Khartoum.*
* For Fowler's opinion as to the superiority of the Nile route over the
Suakin Berber route, see p. 342.
TESTIMONY OF LOKD WOLSELEY 275
"They were invaluable to me in 1884-5, and helped the
army very materially in our advance upon Khartoum. They
were well executed, and enabled my operating columns to find
water where no other available maps informed me it was to
be had.
"I feel I owe your father a deep debt of gratitude for all
the information he furnished me during that too lately under-
taken expedition to try and save General Charles Gordon's
life. You are at liberty to make any use you wish of what
I say here. WT> ,.
" Believe me to be,
« Very faithfully yours,
" WOLSELEY."
To complete the list of Sir John Fowler's engage-
ments outside the United Kingdom, two later expedi-
tions should here be mentioned. In 1886, accompanied
by his wife, he went to Australia, and inspected the
railways of New South Wales, of which for forty years
his brother-in-law, Mr. Whitton, had been engineer-
in-chief. Sir John remained consulting engineer to
the Government of the Colony till his death.
In 1890 he visited India, taking with him his
eldest son. Here he was hospitably entertained by
the Viceroy, Lord Lansdowne, and by the governors
of Bombay, Bengal, and Madras, all of them old
personal friends. A special train was put at his
disposal during the period of his visit. He was con-
sulted by Lord Koberts on the frontier railways, and
by the Government on a variety of engineering
problems. This flattering reception was a fitting re-
cognition of a long career of industry and usefulness.
CHAPTER XL
THE FORTH BRIDGE
"ITTE now come to the last great work with which
' ' Fowler was connected, the crowning victory of
engineering science in the nineteenth century, the
bridging of the tidal estuary of the Forth.
A reference to the map of Scotland will show that
if a line is drawn from D unbar, on the Haddington
coast, to Anstruther, on the opposite shore of Fife,
there will be to the west of it a firth of some 62 miles
long. Till comparatively recent years there was no
bridge across this great flow of water till we reached
its westernmost point at Stirling. The Lothians, Fife,
and Kinross contain some of the richest mineral and
agricultural districts in the United Kingdom, but up
to the year 1885, when the Alloa Bridge was made,
all traffic between the north and south of the Forth
had to go round by Stirling, or be carried over the
firth in ferry-boats. The bridge at Alloa was some
42 miles to the west of the imaginary line above
described. There were three principal ferries across
the water. That best known to passengers of the
present generation, from Granton to Burntisland,
which was twenty-four miles up the Forth ; next, some
eight miles higher up the river, the passage familiar
to readers of Tlie Antiquary, from South to North
276
THE OLD PASSAGE 277
Queensferry, close to the site of the great bridge ;
and a smaller and less important crossing, to Kin-
cardine, some fifteen miles further to the west. In
addition to the great inconvenience caused to local
travellers and traffic, a vast amount of goods in transit
to the northern part of Scotland was brought into
Edinburgh by the great trunk lines from the south,
and there delayed. The railway passage at Stirling and
at Alloa was in the hands of one company, which
naturally was not inclined to give the fullest facilities
to its competitors.
As we noticed in discussing the Channel Ferry
scheme, there was between Granton and Burntisland
a service of ferry-boats, which carried goods trains, or
portions of goods trains, from shore to shore, but the
transit of passengers was attended with the most
terrible discomfort and inconvenience. After a short
railway journey from Edinburgh, the passengers with
their luggage were turned out at Granton at a miserable
station. Laden with wraps and hand-packages, they
had to stagger down over rough cobble stones to the
steamer. Here, at a narrow gangway, a stern official
demanded the ticket of the exhausted traveller, who
had to drop his packages in the wet, and search his
pockets for the missing bit of cardboard. The heavy
baggage was brought down in hand-barrows by per-
spiring porters. The descent, when the tide was low,
was steep, and the only brake employed on the two-
wheeled luggage barrows was the iron-shod front
supports. These, set down on the cobbles, produced
a terrific grinding noise, which caused a widespread
panic among the timid and struggling passengers.
The ascent of these barrows was aided on debarka-
278 THE FOETH BRIDGE
tion by great Clydesdale horses with clanking chains,
which charged among the sea- sick and heavily-laden
crowd. At the end of the summer season, when the
trains were crowded by a southward-tending flight
of passengers, the railway companies were frequently
obliged to leave the baggage behind, and travellers
to England found on arrival at Edinburgh that they
must either stay the night or go on without their
luggage. The distance across was about five miles, and
on some days of wild weather the ferry service had
to be suspended. The steamers were not large, as the
harbour accommodation was not extensive, and in an
easterly gale a crowded passage in the John Stirling
or the William Mure was a most painful experience.
In the dim distance, some eight miles away, the passen-
ger could see and follow with his prayers the building
of the great bridge which was to take him in safety
and comfort from shore to shore.
The bridge, in fact, was urgently desired by the great
railway companies, the local traders, and by the growing
flight of passengers to Fife and the north. With the
successful erection of the second Tay Bridge, which
preceded the Forth Bridge by some years, the important
trading centres of Dundee, Arbroath, and Aberdeen
stood ready to add their traffic to the new route.
The elaborate history of the Forth Bridge,* re-
* We desire to acknowledge here our extreme indebtedness to this
elaborate and beautiful volume. The following extract from a letter
written by one of the editors, Mr. James Dredge, to Sir John Fowler, is
of considerable interest : —
"March 7^, 1890. ... I was pleased to hear from Percival this morning
that you like our Record of the Bridge. I am well satisfied with it, and
we all are. The opening of the Britannia Bridge, forty years ago, was
celebrated by the production of a volume that cost £12,000 to produce ;
the record of your work (so far) is a sixpenny newspaper ! "
SIK T. BOUGH'S PLAN 279
printed from Engineering, to which we are indebted
for many of these particulars, tells of one or two
earlier but abortive schemes for bridging the firth.
A double tunnel was proposed in 1805. In 1818
Mr. James Anderson proposed a chain bridge, of which
Mr. Westhofen has remarked that it was so slight a
structure that it would hardly have been visible on
a dull day, and that after a storm it would never again
have been visible even on a clear day.
In 1860 and in 1865 Mr. (afterwards Sir Thomas)
Bouch, at the instance of the North British Eailway
Company, proposed a bridge to cross at a point some six
miles above Queensferry. This proposal fell through,
and it was not till 1873 that a separate and inde-
pendent company, the Forth Bridge Company, was
formed to carry out Sir Thomas Bouch's design of a
suspension bridge, with two spans of 1,600 feet each.
The Great Northern, the North Eastern, the Midland,
and the North British Eailways agreed to find the
capital, and to send traffic sufficient over the bridge
to pay 6 per cent, on the contract price. Some founda-
tion stones were laid, but in December, 1879, the
first Tay Bridge, the design of Sir Thomas Bouch,
collapsed, and the public confidence was shaken. Sir
John Fowler, it may be remarked in passing, had
always distrusted this work, and would not allow his
family to cross it. One of the defects of the bridge
was that the piers were constructed with too narrow
a base. Sir John Fowler, on the day of the news
reaching London, happened to meet his friend, Mr.
Nasmyth, the inventor of the steam hammer, at an
exhibition of Holbein pictures, and the remark passed
between the two engineers that the ill-fated bridge
280 THE FOKTH BEIDGE
might still be standing if the designer had adopted the
Holbein " straddle," that peculiar attitude which the
artist gives to his male figures, very particularly, it
may be remembered, in his pictures of King Henry
VIII. The design of the bridge, however, is now
admitted to have been faulty in other respects. As
a result of this mishap, Sir Thomas Bouch's design for
a suspension bridge over the Forth was abandoned, and
Messrs. Barlow, Harrison, and Fowler, the consulting
engineers of the promoting railway companies, met to
decide what steps should be taken. The inquiry con-
sidered the situation from every point of view. They
discarded the proposal for a tunnel and the principle
of a suspension bridge, and finally adopted, with some
modifications introduced to meet the views of the
other engineers, a plan submitted by Messrs. Fowler
and Baker, who were appointed engineers to carry it
into effect .
In July, 1882, an Act was obtained. Each of the
contracting railway companies agreed to find its share
of capital, and to guarantee the payment of 4 per
cent. The North British Kailway undertook to keep
up the permanent way and to manage the traffic ;
while the Forth Bridge Eailway Company was charged
with the maintenance and repair of the fabric of the
bridge.
With regard to the modifications introduced into the
original design, Sir Benjamin (then Mr.) Baker, speak-
ing at the Society of Arts shortly before the opening of
the bridge, remarked :—
"If we had to do the work again, with our present ex-
perience, I doubt if some of these modifications would be
insisted upon, whilst others would be made."
THE CANTILEVEK 281
The spot chosen for the bridge is at Queensferry,
where half-way across the channel of the firth stands
the rocky island of Inchgarvie. On each side of the
island the water is in places over 200 feet deep, and it
was judged necessary to avoid this deep water and to
build the bridge of two spans, with a central pier on
the rock of Inchgarvie. Each span is of the unprece-
dented size of 1,710 feet, that is, three and two-third
times as long as the Britannia Bridge over the Menai
Straits, till then the longest span in the kingdom. The
dimensions of each span is such that if erected in the
Strand, near Charing Cross, its other end would reach
across the Adelphi, the Thames Embankment, and the
river itself, to the Surrey side.
The principle adopted is now known as that of the
cantilever. With regard to this, Sir B. Baker has
remarked : —
" When I was a student, a girder bridge which had the top
member in tension and the bottom member in compression
over the piers, was called a 'continuous girder bridge.' The
Forth Bridge is of that type, and I used to call it a continuous
girder bridge ; but the Americans persisted in calling all the
bridges they were building on the same plan * cantilever bridges.'
. . . Cantilever is a' two-hundred-year-old term for a bracket,
and the Forth Bridge spans are made up of two brackets and a
connecting girder. Imagine two men trying to shake hands
across a stream a little too wide for their hands to meet. One
man extends his walking-stick, and the other grasps it, and so
the stream is bridged. There we have the two arms or brackets
and the connecting girder. In the Forth Bridge the arms are
supported by great struts, as in a living model (shown in the
illustration), where raking struts extended from the men's wrists
to the points of support. The principle of bracket and girder
construction is as old as the hills, for it lends itself particularly
to timber construction, which we know in primitive times
preceded masonry."
282 THE FOKTH BEIDGE
The living model mentioned above was arranged as
follows : —
"Two men sitting on chairs extended their arms and
supported the same by grasping sticks abutting against the
chairs. This represented the two double cantilevers. The
central beam was represented by a short stick slung from the
near hands of the two men, and the anchorages to the canti-
levers by ropes extending from the other hands of the men to
a couple of piles of bricks. When stresses are brought to bear
on this system by a load on the central beam, the men's arms
and the anchorage ropes came into tension and the sticks and
the chair-legs into compression." *
In the Forth Bridge it is to be imagined that the
chairs are placed a third of a mile apart ; that the
men's heads are 340 feet above the ground ; that
the pull on each arm is about 4,000 tons, the thrust
on each stick over 6,000 tons, and the weight on the
legs of the chair about 25,000 tons.
The point most important to be grasped by the
amateur is that each bracket or limb of the canti-
lever is an independent or self-supporting structure,
and that in the connecting girder there is nothing of
the nature of the keystone or locking of an arch. A
neglect of this point, which is obvious enough, has
given rise to some very inept criticisms.
In connection with the antiquity of the principle,
Lord Napier of Magclala remarked to one of the
engineers, " I suppose you touch your hats to the
* This illustration, originally devised by Sir B. Baker for the purpose
of a popular lecture, has been reproduced in descriptions of the Forth
Bridge in every language of the civilised globe. It may add to the
cosmopolitan interest of the illustration if it is stated that the central
figure is Mr. Kaichi Watanabe, then an engineering student with Messrs.
Fowler and Baker, and now President and Engineer-in-Chief of several
Japanese railways.
Q u>
O .5
§ I
O I
S ~
>
2
ANTICIPATIONS 283
Chinese?" " Yes, indeed," was the reply, "bridges on
that principle were built in China many centuries
ago." The bridges familiar to us in the old willow-
pattern crockery are for the most part of this design.
An even older anticipation of the tubular-bridge
principle (which consists, to speak popularly, in divid-
ing the girder into an upper and lower member, by
taking away the material at the centre where it is not
required, and adding it where it is most wanted to
resist the strain of bending, i.e. by tension in the upper
and compression in the lower member of the so-called
tube or girder) has been noted by Dr. McAlister in a
most interesting article entitled " How a Bone is Built,"
published in the English Illustrated Magazine for July,
1885, in which he compares the deft and economical
process of nature in the fashioning of a bone with the
practice of the engineers who built the Britannia
Tubular Bridge, and the great Forth Bridge then in
process of construction.
The merit of the Forth Bridge lies not in its
originality, but in the successful application of an
old principle to new conditions. In an article con-
tributed to the Nineteenth Century review, July, 1889,
Sir John Fowler and Sir Benjamin Baker wrote :—
" The adaptability of the cantilever system of construction
for railway bridges of large span became obvious to ourselves,
and no doubt to others, soon after the invention of Bessemer
made cheap steel a possibility. In 1865 we designed a steel
cantilever bridge of 1,000 feet span for a proposed viaduct
across the Severn, near the site of the present tunnel ; * but it
was not until 1881 that the Forth Bridge designs were
published in the English and American technical journals.
* With regard to this proposal, see p. 356.
284 THE FORTH BRIDGE
These designs naturally attracted much attention, and with
characteristic promptness American engineers realised the
advantages of the system, and designed and built the follow-
ing year a steel cantilever railway bridge on the Canadian
Pacific Railway, and have since followed on with more than
half a dozen others of the same type of construction."
The history of this great engineering feat is in
itself a beautiful illustration of the relation of human
effort or ability to the environment by which it is
necessarily surrounded. The " able men " who de-
signed and carried into effect this stupendous structure
have been themselves most insistent in giving promi-
nence to the contributing influence of outside con-
ditions. The antiquity of the principle, and the new
value given to it by the invention of new processes
for the cheap production of suitable material, have
been amply noticed in the above quotation, but the
most important consideration of all is that set out by
Sir Benjamin Baker in his presidential address to the
Institution of Civil Engineers in 1895. He there
draws attention to what we may term the economic as
opposed to the material conditions which are now
necessary to the successful accomplishment of a great
design.
"An impartial survey of actions and events recorded in
history will satisfy most people that in all ages there were to
be found men no less intellectual and enterprising than our-
selves, and that the demands of the time, whether warlike or
peaceful, have always proved capable of realisation. That
'Necessity is the mother of Invention' is true of all ages,
and the only difficulty in making forecasts is the strange way
in which the aims of different generations vary. . . . The
popular notion that some great advance is due to the brilliant
inspiration of a particular genius proves, on closer examination,
THE DEMAND OF THE TIME 285
to be wrong, as the advance was merely the result of the
operation of the ordinary laws of supply and demand, and the
genius himself very probably will have committed himself in
writing to a sufficient extent to prove that he really was drift-
ing with the stream rather than piloting the ship."
Without accepting in full this modest disclaimer of
originating ability, we are enabled, by the consideration
here put forward, to estimate in their true proportions
the various currents which unite to form the full stream
of progress. Originating ability is controlled and directed
by the demand of the time ; till demand arises, it is
apt to lie dormant or to expend itself on other objects.
Thus the workmen who built the Santa Maria for
Columbus, and the Royal Harry for our Tudor king,
" were quite capable as artificers of constructing with the same
materials and implements clipper ships of from 500 to 900
tons, such as astonished the world by the historical race from
China to London in 1866."
The reason, that ingenuity in those earlier times lay
comparatively idle, is to be found in the fact that
"wars, revolutions, and great social changes occupied men's
thoughts in former times, and there was not that unceasing
struggle for commercial supremacy and material advantages
which is so characteristic of the present century."
Apart, therefore, from the ability of the builders,
and the presence of suitable material at a moderate
cost, the Forth Bridge is also due to those industrial
conditions which make the saving of a few hours' time
on the transport of passengers and goods a motive of
irresistible urgency.
A bridge on this stupendous scale, if it was to secure
the public confidence, must possess great rigidity. It
286 THE FOKTH BRIDGE
must not only be able to carry the burdens imposed
upon it, but, if the timidity of the travelling public
was to be overcome, vibration both under the load of
the passing trains and also from the lateral pressure
of the wind must be reduced to an imperceptible
minimum. Further, if it was to be built at all, the
incomplete structure must (as the period of erection
was to last some years) be as competent to resist the
force of the hurricane as the finished bridge. Nothing
but the best material could be used, yet at the same
time a reasonable economy (as far as was compatible
with these requirements) had to be observed, in order
to bring it within the category of a legitimate com-
mercial venture.
In securing these imperative conditions the distri-
bution of the weight of the bridge is of the first
importance. The design adopted throws the greater
proportion of the weight, nearly one -fourth of it,
immediately over the main piers or supports, where
it is, of course, most easily provided for. It also is so
devised that at the points where the lateral pressure
of the wind is most to be dreaded, the smallest surface
is presented to the blast. Thus at the central tower
of the Inchgarvie pier the weight per foot run is 23
tons, and, in the first bay of the cantilever, 21 tons;
while on the central girders of 350 feet span, which join
the arms of the cantilevers, that is at the point furthest
from the main support, the weight is only a little over
2 tons per foot. Again, the surface presented to the
wind is rapidly lessened as the brackets recede from the
massive piers, and on the centre of the span where
the leverage of wind pressure is most formidable, the
narrowest surface is exposed. Great stability is also
THE COST 287
given to the structure by the " straddling" of the sup-
porting columns.
Again, during the course of construction the several
portions of the bridge were placed securely in position,
one after the other ; there was little or no temporary
work required, and each addition to the structure
served as a staging for the work that was to follow.
A further difficulty was occasioned by the fact that
the enormous mass of metal employed in the building
is liable to contraction and expansion from changes
of temperature. This has been adequately provided
for by expansion-joints, a device readily adaptable
to the cantilever and central girder principle of con-
struction.
On December 21st, 1882, the contract for the con-
struction of the Forth Bridge was let to the firm of
Messrs. Tancred, Arrol, and Co. The original contract
price of £1,600,000 and the specified time were in-
evitably exceeded. The total expenditure on the Forth
Bridge itself, and on the new railways connecting it
with the North British Kailway system, was £3,367,625,
and the net earnings suffice to pay four per cent, upon
this amount.
Let us begin our description of the famous structure
by giving an account of the supporting piers.
The point chosen for the bridge is at a narrowing
of the firth caused by a promontory on the north
or Fife side. This projection of land reduces the
crossing of the river to 1 mile and 150 yards. The
promontory is of hard whinstone. Midway in the
channel, at a distance of one-third of a mile from
the top of the promontory, and due south, lies the
rock of Inchgarvie. The north channel, between the
288 THE FOETH BRIDGE
island and the Fife coast, has a depth of about
200 feet, and is the one generally followed by the
shipping.
The southern edge of the island is under water, and
from it to South Queensferry is a distance of 2,000
feet, of which about 500 feet are uncovered at low
tide. The whinstone, or basaltic trap rock, which
forms the foundation of the great Fife and of the
Inchgarvie piers, disappears in the southern channel
(i.e. between South Queensferry and Inchgarvie), and
is overlaid by a thick bed of hard boulder clay with
a forty -feet topping of softer clay, silt, and gravel.
When the southern mainland is reached, the ground
rises gradually, the clay disappears, and ledges of
freestone rock crop out. The foundations of the third
or South Queensferry Pier are laid in this bed of
boulder clay. From an engineering point of view
the nature of the foundations has been considered
highly satisfactory, and no trouble was at any time
experienced in this respect.
The following is taken from Sir B. Baker's speech
at the Royal Institution on May 20th, 1887 :—
"The total length of the viaduct is about 1.J- miles, and
this includes two spans of 1,700 feet, two of 675 feet being
the shoreward ends of the cantilever, and fifteen of 168 feet.
Including piers there is thus almost exactly one mile covered
by the great cantilever spans, and another half-mile of viaduct-
approach. . . .
"Each of the main piers includes four columns of masonry
founded on the rock or boulder clay. Above low water the
cylindrical piers are of the strongest flat bedded Arbroath
stone set in cement and faced with Aberdeen granite. The
height of these pieces of masonry is 36 feet, and the diameter
53 feet at bottom and 49 feet at top, and they each contain
WATER FOUNDATIONS 289
48 steel bolts 2| inches in diameter and 24 feet long to hold
down the superstructure.
"Below low water the piers differ somewhat in character,
according to the local conditions. On the Fife side, one of
the piers was built with the aid of a half -tide dam, and the
other with a full-tide dam. The rock was blasted into steps,
diamond drills and other rock drills being used. Even this
comparatively simple work was not executed without consider-
able trouble, as the sloping rock bottom was covered with
a closely compacted mass of boulders and rubbish, through
which the water flowed into the dam in almost unmanageable
quantity. After many months' work the water was suffi-
ciently excluded, by the use of cement bags and liquid grout
poured in by divers under water and other expedients, and
the concrete foundation and masonry were proceeded with."
For the sake of those uninitiated in the use of
engineering terms, a word may here be interpolated as
to "dams," or "cofferdams," as ^they are sometimes
called, and as to " pneumatic caissons," — two devices
for facilitating foundation - work in water. These, of
necessity, played a most important part in the construc-
tion of this bridge. The following is abridged from the
explanation contained in the reprint from Engineering.
A cofferdam or caisson may be described as an enclosure
in water for the purpose of laying dry the space
enclosed, or at any rate of preventing a flow of water
through it. In soft ground this is done by driving
a double row of piles at a distance of from two feet to
four feet from each other, till a double timber wall
exists all round. Sluice doors or valves are placed
so as to allow the tide to flow in and out. The
single timber piles are held together by longitudinal
timbers aided by stays and struts to resist the water
pressure without. The space between the two lines
u
290 THE FOETH BRIDGE
of piles is then cleared out, and filled in with clay
puddle, and pressed down, till the whole is filled in
to full-tide or half-tide level, as the case may be.
The sluices are then closed and the water pumped
out, the bottom is thus exposed for examination or
for foundation work. The choice between a full-tide
or half- tide dam will be generally determined by the
firmness of the hold obtained by the piles, and also
by the extent of external pressure from water, tide,
and wind. Into a half-tide dam the water must be
allowed to enter, when the tide rises to the level of the
dam wall, and requires to be pumped out when the
tide again falls. With a full-tide dam the water is per-
manently excluded and work can go on continuously.
When working on rock the driving of piles is
impracticable, and other means have to be devised.
Dams giving access to the proposed foundations had
in such cases to be made by sinking shields fitted to
the contour of the rock, aided by submarine building
operations by divers, who laid bags of concrete in
position, and so gradually built up half-tide caissons
such as were used at the Inchgarvie north circular
piers. As an example of work of this character it may
be stated that at the north-east pier there were two
half-tide caissons, and out of them there had each day
to be pumped 250,000 gallons in one case and 340,000
in the other. The time occupied was just under an
hour.
Finally, if instead of a caisson open at the top the
caisson is covered in, like a bell or gas-holder, and
the water is driven out by forcing air in, thereby
allowing the workmen to enter and excavate in the
dry, it is a caisson worked by the pneumatic process.
PNEUMATIC CAISSONS 291
When the foundations, as at the southernmost piers of
Inchgarvie, had to be constructed in deep water this
last method became necessary.
" Several designs," says Sir B. Baker in his Royal Institution
lecture, "were prepared for these foundations, but it was
finally decided, and as experience proved wisely, to put them
in by what is known as the pneumatic or compressed-air
process. The conditions of the problem were a sloping, very
irregular, and fissured rock bottom, in an exposed sea-way, and
with a depth at high water of 72 feet. Anything in the nature
of a water-tight cofferdam, such as used at the shallow piers,
was out of question, and the plan adopted was as follows : — ,
"Two wrought iron caissons, which might be likened to
large tubs or buckets, 70 feet in diameter and 50 to 60 feet
high, were built on launching-ways on the sloping southern
foreshore of the Forth. The bottom of each caisson was set up
7 feet above the cutting edge, and so constituted a chamber
70 feet in diameter and 7 feet high, capable of being filled
at the proper time with compressed air, to enable the men
to work, as in a diving-bell, below the water of the Forth. The
caisson weighed about 470 tons, was launched, and then taken
to a berth alongside the Queensferry jetty, where a certain
amount of concrete, brickwork, and staging was added, bringing
the weight up to 2,640 tons. At Inchgarvie a very strong
and costly iron staging had previously been erected, alongside
which the caisson was finally moored in correct position for
sinking. Whilst the work described was proceeding, divers
and labourers were engaged in making a level bed for the
caisson to sit on. The 16-feet slope in the rock bottom was
levelled up by bags filled with sand or concrete. As soon
as the weight of the caisson and filling reached 3,270 tons
the caisson rested on the sand bags and floated no more. The
high ledge of rock upon which the northern edge of the caisson
rested was blasted away, holes being driven by rock drills and
otherwise under the cutting edge and about six inches beyond
for the charges. After the men had gained a little experience
292 THE FORTH BRIDGE
in this work no difficulty was found in undercutting the hard
whinstone rock to allow the edge of the caisson to sink, and
of course there was still less difficulty in removing the sand
bags temporarily used to form a level bed. The interior rock
was excavated as easily as on dry land, the whole of the 70 feet
diameter by 7 feet high chamber being thoroughly lighted by
electricity. Access was obtained through a vertical tube with
an air-lock at the top, and many visitors ventured to pass
through this lock into the lighted chamber below, where the
pressure at times was as high as 35 Ibs. per square inch.
Probably the most astonished visitors were some salmon, who,
attracted by the commotion in the water caused by the escape
of compressed air under the edge of the caisson, found them-
selves in the electric-lighted chamber. When in the chamber
the only notice of this escape of large volumes of air was
the sudden pervadence of a dense fog, but outside a huge wave
of aerated water would rise above the level of the sea, and
a general effect prevail of something terrible going on below.
No doubt the salmon thought they had come to a cascade
turned upside down, and, following their instinct of heading
up it, met their fate. Another astonished visitor was a
gentleman who took a flat-sided spirit flask with him into the
caisson, and emptied it when down below. Of course the
bottle was filled with compressed air, which exploded when
passing through the air-lock into the normal atmospheric
pressure, the pressure in the bottle being 33 Ibs. per square
inch.
"The Garvie piers, notwithstanding the novelties involved
in sinking through whinstone rock at a depth of 72 feet below
the waves of the Forth, were completed without misadventure
in less than the contract time. The first of the deep Garvie
caissons was launched on March 30th, 1885, and both piers
were finished to sea-level or above by the end of the year.
"At Queensferry all four piers were founded on caissons
identical in principle with those used for the deep Garvie
piers. The deepest was 89 feet below high water, and weighed
20,000 tons ; the shallowest of the four was 71 feet high, the
THE CAISSONS 293
diameter in all cases, as at Garvie, being 70 at the base. Some
difference in detail occurred in these caissons, as compared
with Garvie, owing to the differences of the conditions. Thus,
instead of a sloping surface of rock the bed of the Forth was of
soft mud to a considerable depth, through which the caissons
had to be sunk into the hard boulder clay. Double skins were
provided for the caissons, between which concrete could be
filled in to varying heights if necessary, so that greater weight
might be applied to the cutting edge where the mud was hard
than where it was soft. The annular wall of concrete also
gave great strength to resist the hydrostatic pressure outside
the caisson, for it must be understood that the water was
excluded both below and above the working chamber.
" The process of sinking was as follows : the caisson being
seated on the soft mud, which, of course, practically filled
the working chamber, air was blown in, and a few men
descended the shaft or tube of access to the working chamber
in order to clear away the mud. This was done by diluting
it to the necessary extent by water brought down a pipe
under pressure, and by blowing it out in this liquid state
through another pipe by means of the pressure of air in the
chamber. It was found that the mud sealed the caisson, so
that a pressure of air considerably in excess of that of the
water outside could be kept up, and it was unnecessary to
vary the pressure according to the height of the tide. In
working through the soft mud both intelligence and courage
were called for on the part of the men, and it is a pleasure
and duty for me to say that the Italians and Belgians engaged
on the work were never found wanting in those qualifica-
tions. . . .
" With one of our caissons we unfortunately had an accident
and loss of life. On New Year's Day, 1885, the south-west
Queensferry caisson, which had been towed into position and
weighted with about 4,000 tons of concrete, stuck in the
mud, and instead of rising with the tide remained fixed, so
that the water flowing over the edge filled the interior. The
additional weight of water caused the caisson to sink further in
294 THE FOKTH BEIDGE
the mud, especially at the outer edge, and to slide forward and
tilt. The contractors determined to raise the skin of the
caisson until it came above water-level, and then pump out
and float the caisson back into position. About three months
were occupied in doing this, but when pumping had proceeded
a certain extent the caisson collapsed, owing to the heavy
external pressure of the water, and two men were killed. It
was necessary then to consider very carefully what had better
be done, as the torn caisson was difficult to deal with."
Some arduous work had to be done by the divers
to make the caisson again watertight.
"Finally, on October 19th, 1885, or between nine and ten
months after the first accident, the caisson, to the relief of
everyone, was floated into position, and the sinking proceeded
without further difficulty. Thus the last of the main piers
was completed in March, 1886, almost exactly two years after
the first caisson was floated out."
It was necessary to restrict the hours of work in
these compressed-air chambers, as the men suffered
more or less from pains in the limbs and elsewhere.
Paralysis and other serious consequences are reported
to have followed on too long an exposure to these
conditions. There were, however, at the Forth Bridge
no deaths directly resulting from the air pressure, and
Sir Benjamin Baker says that he himself suffered no
sort of inconvenience from entering the chamber.
For a description of the superstructure on the main
piers, which we must now suppose to be successfully
founded, we must rely again on Sir B. Baker's lecture
at the Eoyal Institution.
Owing to the unprecedented length of the span, the
dead weight of the structure itself was far in excess
of any number of railway trains which could be
WIND PEESSUEE 295
brought upon it. Thus the weight of one of the 1,700-
feet spans is about 16,000 tons, while the heaviest
rolling load could not be more than 800 tons,* or only
5 per cent, of the dead weight.
"It is hardly necessary to say that the bridge will be as
stiff as a rock under the passage of a train. Wind, however,
is a more important element than train weight, as with the
assumed pressure of 56 Ibs. per square foot the estimated
lateral pressure on each 1,700-feet span is 2,000 tons, or two
and a half times as much as the rolling load. To resist wind
the structure is 'straddle-legged,' that is, the lofty columns
over the piers are 120 feet apart at the base and 33 feet at
the top. Similarly the cantilever bottom members widen out
at the piers. All of the main compression members are tubes,
because that is the form which, with the least weight, gives
the greatest strength. The tube of the cantilever is at the
piers 12 feet in diameter and 1J inch thick, and it is subject
to an end pressure of 2,282 tons from the dead weight, 1,022
tons from the trains, and 2,920 tons from the wind, total
6,224 tons, which is the weight of one of the largest trans-
atlantic steamers with all her cargo on board. The vertical
tube is 343 feet high, 12 feet in diameter, and about f inch
thick, and is liable to a load of 3,279 tons. The tension
members are of lattice construction, and the heaviest stressed
one is subject to a pull of 3,794 tons. All of the structure
is thoroughly braced together by wind bracing of lattice
girders, so that a hurricane or cyclone storm may blow in
any direction up or down the Forth without affecting the
stability of the bridge. Indeed, even if a hurricane were
blowing up one side of the Forth and down the other, tending
to rotate the cantilevers on the piers, the bridge has the
strength to resist such a combination."
The highest recorded pressure on the wind gauges
on Inchgarvie during the period of construction would
* The weight actually put on it by the Government inspectors in
their last test consisted of two trains, each weighing about 901 tons.
296 THE FORTH BRIDGE
not, in Sir B. Baker's opinion, have averaged more
than 20 Ibs. per square foot. With regard to this
question of wind pressure, it is interesting to notice
that Sir Thomas Bouch, when asked at the Court of
Inquiry why he had made the unfortunate Tay Bridge
so much weaker than other tall viaducts erected by
himself, replied that his ideas on the subject of wind
pressure had been modified by a statement of Sir
George Airy, the late Astronomer Eoyal, contained
in a report on the proposed Forth Bridge to the
effect that "the greatest wind pressure to which a
plane surface like that of the bridge will be subjected
in its whole extent is 10 Ibs. per square foot." The
Board of Trade, however, warned by the fate of the
Tay Bridge, had laid it down that a 56-lbs. pressure
must be provided for, while the technical work of
Tredgold named 40 Ibs. as the limit. Sir George
Airy, somewhat incautiously, published in the columns
of Nature, October 19th, 1882, an adverse criticism
of the Fowler-Baker design, and endeavoured to show
that a suspension bridge would have been more
suitable. Sir George Airy was then over eighty years
of age, but his high repute as a man of science
gave weight to his opinion, and his criticisms caused
uneasiness to the uninstructed public and considerable
indignation in the technical journals. One of them,
Engineering, December 15th, 1882, rather cruelly set
out a long list of similar ineptitudes committed by
this distinguished astronomer, whose adventures in
engineering criticism provide an almost heroic instance
of the soundness of the maxim, ne sutor ultra crepidam.
"Sir George Airy's periodic attacks on engineering works
are instructive, inasmuch as they serve to indicate the blunders
WORKSHOPS AT QUEENSFERRY 297
which inexperienced engineers would be likely to fall into,
if entrusted with responsibility before being properly qualified.
The late Astronomer Royal throughout his long career has
laboured under the hallucination that the science of engineer-
ing is not a matter of experience and research, but of
intuition. ... Possibly he may have at times mistaken the
silence of engineers for acquiescence, but supposing Sir George
wrote a letter, stating that in his opinion the distance from
London to Edinburgh was 20 miles, we doubt whether anyone
would take the trouble to correct him."
On this occasion, however, several distinguished engi-
neers took part in the controversy, and showed very
conclusively the error and irrelevancy of Sir G. Airy's
criticisms.
To return to the question of the manufacture of
the plates which composed the tubes used in the
bridge. Special plant had to be devised for their
preparation. Long furnaces, heated in some instances
by gas producers and in others by coal, first heated
the plates, which were then hauled between the dies
of an 800-ton hydraulic press, and bent to the proper
radius. When cool, the edges were planed all round,
and the plates built up into the form of a tube in
the drilling yard. Here they were dealt with by
eight great travelling machines, having ten traversing
drills radiating to the centre of the tube, and drilling
through as much as four inches of solid steel in places.
When complete, the tubes were taken down, the plates
cleaned and oiled and stacked ready for erection. The
magnitude of the work justified the erection of the
most elaborate and complete workshops on the Queens-
ferry shore. Here the whole of the steel work of the
298 THE FOKTH BEIDGE
bridge was made and fitted. This fact should be noted
as one of the many unique features in the building of
the Forth Bridge.
" The tension members and lattice girders " — we quote
again Sir B. Baker — "generally are of angle bars, sawn to
length when cold, and of plates planed all round. Multiple
drills tear through immense thickness of steel at an astonish-
ing rate. The larger machines have ten drills, which, going
as they do, day and night, at 180 revolutions per minute,
perform work equivalent to boring an inch hole through
280 feet thickness of solid steel every twenty-four hours.
About four per cent, of the whole weight of steel delivered
at the works leaves it again in the form of shavings from
planing machines and drills. The material used throughout
is Siemens steel of the finest quality, made at the Steel
Company's works in Glasgow, and at Landore in South Wales.
Although one and a half times stronger than wrought iron,
it is not in any sense of the word brittle, as steel is often
popularly supposed to be, but it is tough and ductile as
copper. You can fold half-inch plates like newspapers, and
tie rivet bars like twine into knots."
As already explained, owing to the depth of water
and to the exposed situation in the open firth, scaffold-
ing was impossible ; the bridge had, therefore, to
constitute its own scaffolding.
"The principle of erection adopted was, therefore, to
build first the portion of the superstructure over the main
piers, the great steel towers, as they may be called, although
really parts of the cantilever, and to add successive bays of
the cantilever right and left of these towers, and therefore
balancing each other, until the whole is complete. This
being the general principle, a great deal yet remained to be
done in settling the details."
BUILDING THE CANTILEVEES 299
What was finally settled has been described as
follows : —
"After the skewbacks, horizontal tubes, and a certain
length of the verticals, as high as steam cranes could con-
veniently reach, were built, a lifting stage was erected. This
consisted of two platforms, one on each side of the bridge,
and four hydraulic lifting rams, one in each 12 -feet tube.
To carry these rams, cross girders were fitted in the tubes,
capable of being raised so as to support the rams and plat-
forms as erection proceeded, and steel pins were slipped in to
hold the cross girders. Travelling cranes are placed on the
platforms, and these cranes, with the men working aloft, are, of
course, raised with the platforms, when hydraulic pressure is
let into the rams. The mode of procedure is to raise the plat-
form one foot, and slip in the steel pins to carry the load, whilst
the rams are getting ready to make another stroke of one foot.
When a 16-feet lift has been so made, which is a matter of a
few hours, a pause of some two or three days occurs to allow
the riveting to be completed. The advance at times has been
at the rate of three lifts, or 48 feet in height in a week.
"The riveting appliances designed by Mr. Arrol are of a
very special and even formidable character, each machine
weighing about 16 tons. It consists essentially of an inside
and outside hydraulic ram mounted on longitudinal and
annular girders in such a manner as to command every rivet
in the tubes and to close the same by hydraulic pressure.
Pipes from the hydraulic pumps are carried up inside the
tubes to the riveters, and oil furnaces for heating the rivets
are placed in convenient spots also inside the tubes. By
practice and the stimulus of premiums the men have succeeded
in putting in 800 rivets per day with one of the machines
at a height of 300 feet above the sea, which, in fact, is more
than they accomplished when working at ground level.
Indeed, by the system of erection adopted, the element of
height is practically annihilated, and with ordinary caution
the men are safer aloft than below, as in the former case
they are not liable to have things dropped on their heads."
300 THE FORTH BRIDGE
In this way the central steel towers were built.
The successive bays of the cantilever had then to be
added.
The first half -bay of each cantilever was erected
by a similar use of platforms and overhead cranes.
"Our experience so far," said Sir B. Baker in September,
1889, "has been that whilst the work of erection has been
somewhat slower and more costly than we anticipated, it
has, on the other hand, been less difficult and subject to
fewer contingencies. We thought at first that the crane
men and erectors would require practically to be close
together, but we have found out, or rather the men have
found out for themselves, that cranes 370 feet up in the
air can handle work at ground level, and that the long steel
wire ropes hanging from the crane jibs, instead of being
destructive of their usefulness, are often of great advantage,
as plates and bars can be swung out pendulum fashion to
a distance far beyond the reach of the jib itself. This result
of experience, combined with the boldness of the men, enables
us to dispense with the use of lifting platforms for the outer
bays of the cantilevers, and in lieu of this mode of erection
to use steam cranes travelling on the top. . . ."
The girders which were to carry the permanent way
and the trains were put in when the pile rose to the
necessary height, and furnished an additional platform
for work on the still uncompleted parts of the structure.
" The viaduct girders," says Engineering, " were now built out
by overhanging into the cantilevers. . . . The viaduct girders
were strong enough to carry themselves overhanging for a dis-
tance of 100 feet, and even then to carry at the forward end the
weight of a 3-ton crane and its load ; but, as matter of safety,
wire ropes were carried from the outer ends up to the top junc-
tions on the vertical columns."
M
H
PH °°
It
H I
o -s
THE CENTEAL GIRDER 301
We have now to describe the joining of the canti-
levers by the central girders, the crowning feat, and
completion of the whole structure. Owing to the
swiftness of the current and the exposed nature of
the work, it was not possible to hoist the girder into
position, and it was decided to build it out piece by
piece till the arms of the cantilevers met in the
middle. It must be borne in mind, however, that,
strictly speaking, the great 1,710-feet spans are not
joined in the ordinary sense of the term. Each half-
span hangs entirely from its own supports on the
main piers. Owing to the large amount of expansion
and contraction to which the immense mass of metal
is liable, it would endanger the fabric were it actually
joined. At the junction of the central girder with the
cantilevers expansion-joints are introduced, so that the
shrinkage due to the cold may not cause a gap, and
so that the expansion due to the heat may not cause
" buckling." The extreme variation in the lengths of
the 1,710-feet spans under alternations of heat and cold
is calculated not to exceed nine inches, but provision
has been made for a variation of double that amount.
"Almost every engineering visitor to the works," says Sir
B. Baker, in September, 1889, "during past years has asked,
' How are you going to erect the central girder ? ' I have never
varied myself in opinion as to what would be the best way of
doing the work. In a paper read before the British Association
at Southampton, in 1882, or seven years ago, I said, 'The
central girder will be erected on the overhanging system,
temporary connection being formed between the ends of the
cantilevers and central girders. The closing lengths or key-
pieces at the centre of each 1,700-feet span will be put in
on a cloudy day, or at night, when there is little variation
of temperature, and the details will be so arranged that the
302 THE FOBTH BEIDGE
key-piece can be completed and the temporary connections
cut away in a few hours, so as to avoid any temporary in-
convenience from changes of temperature.' That is a sufficiently
concise description of the plan now in progress for erecting the
central girders."
During the construction of the works Mr. Arrol
showed an interesting model, illustrating how the
expansion and contraction of the metal mass was
provided for at the junction of the cantilevers and
the girders. A movement of six inches was provided
for at the end of each cantilever. The contrivance
to admit of it is most clever. What is termed a
rocking-pillar is introduced between the end of the
cantilever and the end of the girder. The lower end
of the pillar rests in a socket on the cantilever, while
the upper end supports a socket carrying the girder.
In this way a certain amount of play is given to the
junction. The rocking motion may be illustrated by
placing a walking-stick on the ground, and allowing
the upper end to oscillate an inch or so. In this
case the ground would represent the cantilever, and
the hand at the top the girder attachment. Other
arrangements providing against undue strain owing
to contraction and expansion were introduced in the
shape of " sliding bed-plates" and "roller-bearings."
The following account of the actual joining of a
girder on November 14th, 1889, must conclude our
description of this great work. It is taken from the
already frequently quoted pages of Engineering.
"The north central girder had in the meantime been built
out in a precisely similar manner, and by October 15th it
was sufficiently advanced to allow a gangway, 65 feet long,
to be laid across. This enabled the directors of the company
o ,2
h S
d! D
THE BOOKING PILLAR 303
to walk across the bridge from end to end, the chairman of the
company being actually the first person to cross the north
span. By October 28th the last booms were put in, and by
November 6th everything was ready to connect the girder also.
The temperature on that day did not rise, however, sufficiently
high to make the joint, but in the night a sudden rise took
place, and by 7.30 in the morning the bottom booms were joined
together for good.
" It now required a good fall of the temperature to get the
top booms connected, for the two halves of this girder had
been set less high at starting, and there was now practically
no camber in the bottom booms. But the weather remained
obstinate and the temperature very high, and it was not until
the morning of November 14th that the key-plates could be
driven in, and the final connection made. An episode, of
which much has been made in the papers, occurred on this
occasion, and the facts are simply as follows. After the wedges
at the bottom ends had been drawn out and the key-plates
driven in, a slight rise of temperature was indicated by the
thermometer in the course of the morning, and orders were
given to remove the bolts in the central joints of the connect-
ing ties and to light the furnaces. Whether the thermometer
indicated wrongly, or whether the cantilevers had not had time
to fully expand under the rise of temperature, or whether a
decrease of the same took place, it is not now possible to
prove, but when only about thirty-six of the turned steel bolts
remained in the joints, and before the furnaces could get fairly
started, the plate-ties sheared the remaining bolts and parted
with a bang like a shot from a 38-ton gun. Something of
a shake occurred in the cantilevers, which was felt at the
opposite ends and caused some little commotion among the
men. No mishap occurred, however, and nothing in the way
of a fall of the girders took place as stated in the papers,
simply the work of the furnaces and the task of knocking
out thirty-six bolts was saved, and the girder swung in its
rockers as freely as if it had been freed in the most natural
manner.
304 THE FOETH BEIDGE
"And thus the Forth Bridge was completed, for the remain-
ing work was simply to replace temporary connections by
permanent ones, to rivet up those which were only bolted,
and do the thousand and one things which always remain to
be done after everything is said to be finished."
With regard to the staff of workmen, we may again
quote Sir B. Baker : —
"To carry out the work at the Forth Bridge there is an
army of 3,500 workmen, officered by a proportionate number
of engineers. Everything, except the rolling of the steel
plates, is done on the spot, and consequently there are literally
hundreds of steam and hydraulic engines and other machines
and appliances too numerous to mention, many of them of an
entirely original character.
" It is, of course, impossible to carry out a gigantic work of
this kind . . . without paying for it, not merely in money but
in men's lives. I shall have failed in rny task if you do not
to some extent realise the risks to which zealous and plucky
workmen will be sure to expose themselves in pushing on with
the work of erecting the Forth Bridge. Speaking on behalf of
the engineers, I may say that we never ask a workman to do a
thing which we are not prepared to do ourselves, but of course
men will on their own initiative occasionally do rash things.
Thus, not long ago a man trusted himself at a great height to
the simple grasp of a rope, and his hand getting numbed with
cold he unconsciously relaxed his hold and fell backwards a
descent of 120 feet, happily into the water, from which he
was fished out, little the worse, after sinking twice. Another
man, going up in a hoist the other day, having that familiarity
with danger which breeds contempt, did not trouble to close
the rail, and stumbling backwards fell a distance of 180 feet,
carrying away a dozen rungs of a ladder with which he came
in contact as if they had been straws. These are instances of
rashness, but the best men run risks from their fellow- workmen.
Thus, a splendid fellow, active as a cat, who would run hand
over hand along a rope at any height, was knocked over by
THE DIEECTOES AND STAFF 305
a man dropping a wedge on him from above, and killed by a
fall of between one and two hundred feet. There are about
500 men at work at each main pier, and something is always
dropping from aloft. I saw a hole one inch in diameter made
through the four-inch timber of the staging by a spanner which
fell about 300 feet, and took off a man's cap in its course. On
another occasion a dropped spanner entered a man's waistcoat
and came out at his ankle, tearing open the whole of his clothes
but not injuring the man himself in any way."
To give some idea of the size of this work, it is
calculated that there are about eight million of rivets
to be driven. The amount of surface to be painted is
equal to 145 acres. The weight of steel in the main
spans is 51,000 tons. The weight of the 1,710 span
is 16,000 tons. The steel plates required in the con-
struction, if placed in line, would have stretched 45
miles. In the construction there was used 21,000
tons of cement, 47,000 tons of granite, and 113,000
tons of stone.
The directors of the Forth Bridge Kailway Company
were — Mr. M. W. Thompson (chairman) and Mr. W.
Unwin Hey gate, representing the Midland Railway ;
Lord Colville of Culross and Lord Hindlip from the
Great Northern Railway ; Mr. John Dent-Dent (deputy-
chairman) and Sir Matthew White-Ridley, Bart., from
the North Eastern Railway ; the Marquis of Tweeddale
and the Earl of Elgin and Kincardine from the North
British Railway. Mr. Spencer Brunton and Mr. James
Hall Renton were elected by the shareholders. The
secretary was Mr. G. B. Wieland, the secretary of the
North British Railway. The engineers were Sir John
Fowler, K.C.M.G., C.E., and Mr. Benjamin Baker. The
contractors for the bridge were Sir Thomas S. Tancred,
x
306 THE FOETH BEIDGE
Bart., Mr. W. Arrol, Mr. T. H. Falkiner, and Mr. Joseph
Phillips. The contractors for the north and south
approach railways were Mr. W. Arrol, Mr. T. H.
Falkiner, and Mr. Joseph Phillips. On the staff of
Sir John Fowler and Mr. Baker were the following :
Mr. Allan Stewart, Mr. P. W. Meik (resident engineer
from 1883 to 1886), Mr. F. E. Cooper (resident
engineer from 1886 to 1890), and a number of assist-
ants. On the contractors' staff were Mr. Thomas Scott,
manager ; Mr. W. Westhofen, who was specially en-
gaged on the works at Inchgarvie ; Mr. A. S. Biggart,
in charge of drawing offices, shops, and yards ; and a
number of others far too numerous to mention. M.
Coiseau, a Belgian contractor, was in charge of the
pneumatic caissons.
When the Forth Bridge was begun, Sir John Fowler
was no longer a young man ; but though occasionally
in his correspondence there is allusion to a troublesome
bronchial affection, his energy and determination re-
mained unabated. Nominally the chief responsibility
rested on his shoulders, but of course the detailed plans
of this gigantic undertaking required the co-operation
of many minds. It is a structure which has made
the reputation of many men. Beyond the general
responsibility which fell on him as the titular chief of
the engineering staff, Sir John's personal interest was
principally attracted to the masonry of the piers and
to the quality of the granite and other materials em-
ployed in them, a subject which always had had a
great fascination for him, and when it is remembered
that the approach viaducts on each side of the Forth
are in themselves large engineering works involving
a succession of great granite piers, the importance
SIR JOHN ON MATEKIALS 307
of Sir John's favourite study of masonry becomes
apparent.
At the same time, his attention was not exclusively
directed to this point.
The following passage from an address delivered by
him to the Merchant Venturers' School at Bristol sums
up in popular language the great change which, in
the course of his own observation, had come over the
business of bridge building, mainly by reason of im-
provements in material — a change which indeed seemed
to culminate in the methods and designs used on the
Forth Bridge :—
"If I were to be called upon to name one science which
has contributed more than any other to the improvement
of the quality of material, or to economy in its production,
I think I should name chemistry. By means of chemistry
efficiently applied, after thousands of experiments, we have
steel of a high quality at a less cost per ton than iron of even
moderate quality could formerly be produced.
"At the present time 14,000,000 tons of steel rails are
annually made in the world at a less cost per ton, and of more
than three times the durability (or length of life) of the rails
formerly manufactured from the metal called ' iron.'
" What this means in annual economy and greater freedom
from accidents would lead us, if we pursued the investigation,
into very large figures and elaborate statistics, but it is
obviously of such vast importance that it may be classed as
one of the greatest scientific and practical improvements of
modern times.
"Again, by the manufacture of steel plates for ships and
bridges we have a vastly superior and stronger material at less
cost than iron. . . . The Forth Bridge ... is an excellent
illustration of the value of the superior and economical steel
material, first introduced into this country by the process
called 'open hearth,' through the genius of my late dis-
308 THE FOKTH BEIDGE
tinguished friend Sir William Siemens. It is not too much
to say that the great Forth Bridge would have been financially
impossible without the use of steel. With iron it would have
been twice the weight (if practicable at all), in consequence of
the less strength of the material, and more than twice the
cost, and therefore impracticable. . . .
"The Britannia Bridge over the Menai Straits was built
forty years only before the Forth Bridge, but how great the
contrast between the two works !
" Let us compare design, material, and manufacture.
"The design, in the hands of Stephenson and Fairbairn,
was in accordance with the best knowledge and experience of
that day, and presents a solid and safe structure, but with the
material so placed that much of it contributes nothing to the
strength of the bridge, and is mere dead weight, tending to
weaken the bridge.
" On the other hand, the Forth Bridge is designed so that
each member in the structure, either in tension or compression,
has a definite and calculated stress to sustain.
" The material of which the Menai Bridge was constructed
is iron, having an ultimate tensile strength of 22 tons per
square inch, whilst the Forth Bridge is of steel, with a tensile
strength of 33 tons per square inch.
" The improvement in manufacture has been as great as in
the strength and excellence of the material. For instance,
for the Menai Bridge, plates of the dimensions of 12 feet long-
by 2 feet wide, or 24 square feet in area, were obtained with
difficulty, and special credit was accorded to Mr. Thorneycroft
of Wolverhampton for his practical skill in obtaining plates
of that large size. On the Forth Bridge the largest plate was
30 feet by 5 feet, or 150 square feet in area, and was obtained
without difficulty or extra expense, and thus an immense
number of rivets were saved.
" The engineer of the Menai Bridge calculated that, with
the iron they used, a bridge of the span of 1,710 feet might be
constructed, but not an ounce of weight must be put upon it,
or a breath of air allowed to impinge against it. Each span
A VISIT TO SPAIN 309
of the Forth Bridge happens also be 1,710 feet. When tested
by the Board of Trade Inspectors 1,830 tons were put on the
1,710 feet, but 4,000 tons might have been put on it without
injuriously affecting the structure."
This address was delivered some time after the com-
pletion of the bridge, but, for the rest, he took very
little part in the scientific discussions which occasion-
ally arose during the construction of the bridge. He
delighted in showing parties of his friends over the
works, and in explaining to them the nature of the
operations. Except the speech at the opening cere-
mony, and an article signed by himself and by Sir
Benjamin Baker which appeared in the Nineteenth
Century review, he left the work of popular exposition
to his younger colleagues.
The responsibility, however, weighed much on his
mind, and the zeal and energy which he threw into
the work of general superintendence was unremitting.
On March 23rd, 1884, he writes to his wife from
Barcelona, where he had gone partly in search of
health and partly on business.
" I sometimes analyse my motives in coming to Spain. The
ostensible motive, of course, is to see Per's (his son's) work
at the Lomo de Bas mines, as to which I have special duties
as chairman, but I think the strongest of all is to endeavour
to see the Forth Bridge finished, and to have a few more birth-
days with you. You will say these are rather sad and morbid
thoughts, and no doubt they are, but it is always the case
with me when I have not sufficient occupation or absorbing
interests."
" My chief consolation," he says in the same letter, " is the
warm sun, and the consolation is rather the hope that it may
diminish my cough than for the personal comfort, although
that is something."
310 THE FORTH BEIDGE
Later in the year, December 14th, he writes again
from the Forth Bridge, to which he paid a fortnightly
visit.
"I am very much disposed to come here after Christmas
and make this my home for a month or two. I do not think
the work will go on either rapidly or satisfactorily unless I do."
Next day he writes again, "I am more and more convinced
that I must come and live here for a time, if this work is to
progress rapidly."
In October, 1886, he writes :—
"I have all the contractors here, and am hard at work
organising a better progress with the works. They see I am
terribly in earnest, and are carrying out all my suggestions
with the energy I require. . . . The air is softer with the rain,
and probably my cough will be less troublesome than it was
with the cold of yesterday and the day before. I should be
so pleased if I could safely and with reasonable comfort remain
in England all the winter, and spend much of my time here.
We must see."
We quoted earlier in this work a time-table of one
of Sir John Fowler's working days. The same tireless
energy still characterised his movements, as the follow-
ing extract will show.
"FORTH BRIDGE, May 29z%, 1887.
" I have almost settled to leave here very early on Thursday
(3.30 a.m.) and go to Glen Mazeran, and leave there so early
on Friday morning that I have an hour at Inverness with
Dougal and Paterson on Highland railway matters, and go
forward to Inverbroom by the twelve o'clock train from
Inverness.
" On my way to Inverbroom I will call at Braemore House,
and spend half an hour or an hour there whilst the carriage
drives round to the square, also go through the garden before
I go on to Inverbroom. I must leave Inverbroom on Thursday,
O 3
M tf
tf 2
« "*•
W V
K J=
H "
o
Ex*
OfV. •*-/-> -no
OPENING CEREMONY 311
9th, to return here, which I can do on the same day, reaching
Queensferry about eleven o'clock. This is a stiff programme,
and involves early rising and long days, but if I am well, and
my cough not very troublesome, I can manage it all, and it
will be useful work."
Not a bad week's work for a man of seventy years
of age ! On November 17th, 1887, he writes again : —
" I am well this morning, and have just been over the works
with Arrol, Falkiner, and Cooper. The progress of erection is
now very satisfactory, and if we are all spared until next
summer the operations will be more interesting than they have
ever been. ... I am very glad I came here now, as there are
many matters in which my presence will be very useful.
Yesterday the wind was so high that the work of erection was
quite stopped. To-day is calm, and men are perched about
in numerous places from 300 to 400 feet high, and apparently
work as comfortably as if they were on the ground. . . ."
The opening ceremony took place under the auspices
of the Prince of Wales, on March 4th, 1890. A gale
of wind was blowing at the time, and the speech-
making out-of-doors was cut very short. The last
rivet of the bridge was driven by His Koyal Highness,
and the bridge was declared open. The company then
sought the shelter of the banqueting-hall, erected at
the Forth Bridge Station, where luncheon was served.
In his speech after lunch, the Prince announced that
Her Majesty had been pleased to make Sir John Fowler
and Mr. Thompson baronets, Mr. Baker a Knight
Commander of the Order of St. George and St. Michael,
and to confer on Mr. Arrol the honour of knighthood.
Sir John Fowler was called upon to reply. He said :—
"Your Koyal Highness, Mr. Chairman, My Lords and
gentlemen, I have to acknowledge this toast on my own part
312 THE FOKTH BRIDGE
and on that of my colleague and partner Mr. Baker, whom
I must learn as quickly as possible to call Sir Benjamin
Baker, and on behalf of all our able engineering staff who have
been associated with us in the design and construction of the
Forth Bridge."
After referring to the class of critical pessimists
who make it their business to declare that bold and
novel undertakings like the Metropolitan Kail way, the
Suez Canal, and the Forth Bridge are impossibilities,
he went on to say :—
" It is very curious to watch the manner of retreat of these
prophets of failure when results prove they have been mistaken,
and I could tell you some very curious stories connected with
the Forth Bridge. But on this day I feel I can afford to
be magnanimous, and I shall say nothing ill-natured about any
of them — not even the astronomers. I am certain, however,
that the astronomers are very sorry for themselves, because,
since the failure of their predictions as to the Forth Bridge,
cautious people are beginning to be a little doubtful about
these small planets that they say they discover in the sky.
Now, personally, I believe in astronomers, I believe even in their
little planets, but I do not believe in astronomy being a safe
guide for practical engineering. ... I should like to designate
this work as a British work. Scottish and English railway
companies have found the capital. Aberdeen has found the
granite. The greater part of the steel has come from Glasgow.
The cement has come from the clay and chalk cliffs of the
valley of the Thames, which, as you are aware, is in the
neighbouring and very friendly kingdom of England, and part
of the steel has come from ' dear little Wales.' The workmen
have been chiefly Scottish. They are famous throughout the
world as masons, and especially in granite; and I do not
believe, and I profess myself to be a good judge, that a better
piece of mason work was ever executed for any public work in
this world." Then as to the aesthetic aspects of the work.
"This, I confess, gave me a little concern, for I read rather
SIK JOHN'S SPEECH 313
strongly-worded letters in the newspapers, and altogether we
seemed likely to get into hot water over the matter." How-
ever, a learned society in Edinburgh "called to its hall two
famous artistic athletes — Mr. William Morris, as the vigorous
attacker of the Forth Bridge on aesthetic grounds, and Mr.
Benjamin Baker, the equally vigorous defender. The result,
I believe, was that Mr. Baker and the bridge were entirely
victorious." Then as to the durability of the bridge. "We
have two materials in the Forth Bridge — granite and steel.
... With Scottish granite connected with English cement we
have durability and union of parts for at least a thousand
years. ... In regard to the steel, it can be deteriorated or
decayed from two causes — vibration and oxidation. Vibration
can only produce injurious action when the maximum strain
to which it will be habitually exposed by use approaches to
one-half of its ultimate strength ; but as the Forth Bridge can
never have as much as one-fourth of the ultimate strain, I
think we may dismiss vibration as a source of injury. With
regard to oxidation, that means gross neglect by those who
have the bridge in charge ; it means that the painting shall be
so neglected that the atmosphere has direct access to the steel,
and I won't do those who have the charge of this important
and costly work the injustice of supposing such a contingency
to be possible."
After grateful acknowledgment of the work done
by his various colleagues — Mr. Baker, Mr. Allan
Stewart, Mr. Phillips, Mr. Arrol, and Mr. Biggart —
he then, last but not least, claimed their due meed
of praise for those thousands of workmen — brave
men, who for years, often in tempestuous weather,
and at an elevation of one, two, three, or even four
hundred feet above the waters of the Forth, did
their hazardous work, and never knowingly scamped
a rivet.
Sir John's allusion to the artistic aspects of the
314 THE FOKTH BEIDGE
question refers to an incident which is interesting and
amusing.
Mr. William Morris, a great handicraftsman and
man of genius, who unfortunately allowed his fine
artistic sense to be obscured by a disordered political
imagination, seemed to see in the Forth Bridge an
embodiment of all he found amiss in the economy
of our age.
" There never would be," he said, " an architecture in ironr
every improvement in machinery being uglier and uglier,
until they reach the supremest specimen of all ugliness — the
Forth Bridge."
In reply to this tirade Sir B. Baker, lecturing the
following evening (November 27th, 1889) at the
Edinburgh Literary Institute, not unnaturally ex-
pressed a doubt
" if Mr. Morris had the faintest knowledge of the duties which
the great structure had to perform, and he could not judge
of the impression which it made on the minds of those who,
having that knowledge, could appreciate the direction of
the lines of stress and the fitness of the several members to
resist the forces. Probably Mr. Morris would judge the beauty
of a design from the same standpoint, whether it was for a
bridge a mile long, or for a silver chimney ornament. It was
impossible for anyone to pronounce authoritatively on the
beauty of an object without knowing its functions. The
marble columns of the Parthenon were beautiful where they
stood, but if they took one and bored a hole through its axis
and used it as a funnel of an Atlantic liner it would, to his
mind, cease to be beautiful, but of course Mr. Morris might
think otherwise."
" He (Sir B. Baker) had been asked why the under side of
the bridge had not been made a true arc, instead of polygonal
.ESTHETICS 315
in form, and his reply was that to have made it so would have
materialised a falsehood. The Forth Bridge was not an arch,
and it said so for itself. No one would admire bent columns
in an architectural fagade, or a beam tricked out to look like
an arch; but that was really to what the suggestion of his
artistic friends amounted, though they did not see it, being
ignorant of the principles on which the Forth Bridge was
constructed. Critics must first study the work to be done
both by the piers, and by the superstructure, and also the
materials employed, before they are capable of settling whether
it is beautiful or ugly. It would, he added, be a ludicrous
error to suppose that Sir John Fowler and he had neglected
to consider the design from the artistic point of view. They
did so from the very first. An arched form was admittedly
graceful, and they had approximated their bridge to that form
as closely as they could without suggesting false constructions
and shams. They made the compression members strong
tubes, and the tension members light lattice work, so that to
any intelligent eye the nature of the stresses and the
sufficiency of the members of the structure to resist them
were emphasised at all points. It would have been futile
to attempt to ornament the great cantilevers, and so, to keep
the whole work in harmony, they studiously avoided any
attempt at ornamentation of the piers, and people would
search in vain even for a moulded capping, or cornice through-
out the whole work. The object had been so to arrange the
leading lines of the structure as to convey an idea of strength
and stability. This, in such a structure, seemed to be at once
the truest and highest art."
In reference to this interesting question of the
merits or demerits of the bridge from an artistic point
of view, we may fitly conclude our account of this
great work by quoting from a letter of congratulation
written to Sir John Fowler, when the bridge was
completed, by a competent critic, Mr. Alfred Water-
house, R.A. : —
316 THE FOBTH BEIDGE
"20, NEW CAVENDISH STREET,
PORTLAND PLACE, W.,
"December 5th, 1889.
" DEAR SIR JOHN FOWLER, — I was very much obliged to you
for so kindly enabling me to visit the Forth Bridge in so satis-
factory a manner. Your note was the means of my introduc-
tion to Mr. Baker, who happened to be on the spot, and who
was very good to me as introduced by you.
"I expect you are tired of congratulations, but I cannot
help saying how overawed I was by the work. It hardly
looks human. One feature especially delights me — the absence
of all ornament. Any architectural detail borrowed from any
style would have been out of place in such a work. As it is,
the bridge is a style unto itself.
"The simple directness of purpose with which it does its
work is splendid, and invests your vast monument with a kind
of beauty of its own, differing though it certainly does from
all other beautiful things I have ever seen.
" Believe me,
" Yours very truly,
"A. WATERHOUSE."
It would be endless and unnecessary to record the
congratulations and public laudatory notices which
followed the completion of the great bridge. The
Sovereign expressed her approval by conferring titles
on the engineers ; the University of Edinburgh
honoured itself by giving the degree of Doctor of
Laws ; but perhaps the most remarkable acknowledg-
ment of all was the bestowal of the Prix Poncelet on
Sir John Fowler and Sir Benjamin Baker by the
Institute of France, a gratifying and impartial tribute
to the fact that scientific generosity and merit rise
above the narrow limitations of nationality and creed.
At this date there was no other precedent for the
bestowal of this international honour on an English-
THE ENGINEERS' BEST MEMORIAL 317
man, except in the noteworthy instance of Lord
Kelvin, who had already received the same honourable
distinction.
Those, however, who have seen the bridge cannot
but feel that there is a certain incongruity in seeking
to increase, by such means, the fame and honour of
its builders. The most colossal structure of the fore-
most industrial nation of the world, standing as it
does in a place where the natural scenery sets off its
superb proportions, is itself the most appropriate
memorial of its makers.
CHAPTER XII.
THE ENGINEER AT HOME
IT is, of course, in his professional capacity that
Sir John Fowler becomes an outstanding figure in
the engineering world of the second half of the nine-
teenth century, and we have endeavoured to set out the
conjuncture of character and opportunity from which his
public career proceeded.
When we speak of a man's private life we are
ordinarily supposed to refer to those leisure hours
which he spends away from his business. The forma-
tive influence in Sir John Fowler's life and character,
however, was undoubtedly his business experience.
To the incidents of his daily work, his energy,
punctuality, attention to detail, and that probity of
character which is at once controlling and exacting,
both to himself and others, were readily applicable,
and have already been noticed. It remains to con-
sider how a character so profoundly influenced by the
necessities of an industrial age appeared in the more
spontaneous and impulsive atmosphere of home-life.
Fowler was naturally a man of warm affections, and,
though in early life he yielded to it very little, with a
deep strain of sentiment in his disposition. He was
a strong man, but he was also a very good-natured
man, and the fact made him on the whole a kindly
318
PEIVATE AND PUBLIC LIFE 319
minister of those economic laws which some find so
hard and unrelenting. He was, in this way, a popular
man in his own profession and in society. He showed
a generous desire to obtain public recognition of the
work of other members of the profession, and expression
of his opinion had weight with those who had the
responsibility of dispensing public honours. Among
other notable engineering works of the last few years,
he was much interested in the Manchester Ship Canal,
and on the passage of the Bill through Parliament, and
on the completion of the work, he wrote warm letters of
congratulation to the engineer, Mr. (now Sir) E. Leader
Williams. " I am sure," he said, " all your friends will
be pleased and proud, as I am, at the result of your
long perseverance against formidable odds." The com-
pliment was duly appreciated. Sir E. Leader Williams
writes : "Sir John always took an interest in the
success of other engineers in carrying out large works.
He knew by experience the anxiety and worry that
attends the prosecution of such enterprises, and his
kind words and letters were prized by his professional
brethren."
A man's private and public life is not, though we
sometimes talk as if it were, divided into two water-
tight compartments, and Sir John Fowler's case was no
exception, for just as his genial and kindly nature
followed him into his professional life, so occasionally the
somewhat arbitrary habit of thought, acquired by the
practice of command and the achievement of success,
coloured the judgments and actions of his private life.
This must be the explanation of a certain controversial
keenness and love of mastery which, especially in later
years, took possession of him. In professional matters
320 THE ENGINEER AT HOME
this tendency was, as we have remarked, well under
control ; when necessary he knew how to yield, but
naturally, in his expression of political opinions, in
the management of his family and affairs, no such
imperative occasions for concession arose. Happily
in such matters, as we have seen in the important
question of standing for Parliament, he sought and
was much guided by the advice of his wife. Her
womanly tact had a refining and moderating influence
on a temperament that was naturally imperious.
To complete our memorial of Sir John Fowler's
career, some sketch must here be attempted of his
home-life in London and at Braemore.
Up to 1867 he continued to live at 2, Queen Square
Place. Here, as elsewhere, he enjoyed keeping open
house for his friends. Professional men then lived, if
the term may be allowed, on greater terms of intimacy
with their business. The ladies of the family occasion-
ally penetrated into offices which were under the same
roof as the dwelling. During the making of the
Metropolitan Eailway, when much of the work had
to be done in the midnight hours, entertainment
used to be provided for the staff by the hospitable
chief. In the early sixties, and especially during his
presidency of the Institution, he had every Tuesday
night a small dinner-party, to which a select circle of
engineering friends had a standing invitation. Later
in the evening the party adjourned to the weekly
meeting of the Institution. After a day's labour of
opposing one another in the parliamentary committee-
rooms over the way, there would assemble round his
hospitable board the younger Stephenson, Locke,
Brunei, Bidder, Scott-Russell, Rendel, and Hawkshaw.
FKIENDS AND AMUSEMENTS 321
No record, alas ! has been kept of these interesting
gatherings, though with Lady Fowler, who was always,
and with Mr. Baldry, who was sometimes, present, they
live as memories of pleasant and brilliant talk.
In 1867 the Fowlers removed to Thorn wood Lodge,
a house with a large garden and grounds on Campden
Hill, Kensington. Mr. Fowler had become acquainted
with the amenities of this charming rus in urbe while
the house was in the temporary occupation of his friend
Mr. (now Sir) William Vernon Harcourt. Here he had
his London headquarters for the remainder of his life.
He was fond of society, and went everywhere.
Society, too, liked him, and he was accepted socially
as, in an informal way, the representative of his great
profession. He enjoyed being of service to his friends
in little matters of domestic engineering. In this
way he took great pleasure and interest in designing
and superintending the making of the boys' bathing-
place at Harrow, where his sons were at school. He
also was consulted about the levelling of the cricket
ground.
He had been a keen cricketer in his youth, and as a
member of the M.C.C. he was a familiar figure at Lord's,
where he seldom failed to attend at the great matches
of the year.
He had a Yorkshireman's love of a good horse, and,
when in London, he rarely missed his morning ride in
the park. He was a man of great bodily strength, and
he used to say that till he was sixty he did not know
what it was to feel physical fatigue. He was a light
sleeper and woke early. He rose every morning at
six, made himself a cup of tea, and wrote his letters
between seven and nine.
Y
322 THE ENGINEEE AT HOME
"We have already noted his first purchase of land
at Glen Mazeran, Inverness-shire. He soon became
ambitious of something on a larger scale, and in 1865
he purchased the estate of Braemore, in Koss-shire,
and in 1867 the adjoining estate of Inverbroom.
In a letter to his father dated July 15th, 1867, he
gives the following account of his new purchase : —
" The chief works which I am carrying out are building the
new house and the garden and outbuildings, roads, etc., belong-
ing to it, improvement of the arable land, and plantations.
" The house is a serious undertaking, both as regards the
carrying out of such a large work in such a wild, uninhabited
part of the country and as regards its cost. I think it is so
far advanced that no doubt remains we shall be able to cover
it in before the end of October, and have it ready for occupa-
tion next season. The bulk of the stone for the stonework
is obtained from a quarry about a quarter of a mile from the
house. It is a rock very common in the north of Scotland
called gneiss. It is blue in colour, consisting of felspar, quartz,
mica, and hornblende, and therefore in its component parts
not unlike granite, but it appears to have been subjected to
a less degree of heat than granite, as it retains its schistose
or stratified character. It is wonderfully durable, and makes
excellent work for the plain part of the walls, but it cannot
be worked into anything requiring an acies or edge, and there-
fore we have window-heads, sills, plinths, etc., brought from
Glasgow, where quarries supplying the finest compact and
durable sandstone abound. It is brought by sea to the head
of Loch Broom, and then carted six miles to the house. The
contrast of the sandstone with the deep blue gneiss produces
a good effect, and I expect the green Westmoreland slates will
also accord well as to colour.
" The people in the country have been very much astonished
by my building the house 700 feet above the sea, instead of
following the old Scotch practice of burying it in the lowest
place I could find, but now they see what is likely to be
s I
f s
M ^
en 2
* I
w 3
H
PLANTING AT BEAEMOEE 323
realised, and the plantations springing up about it, the new
idea seems to find favour.
"All the plantations are promising well, and I believe in
this climate with a southern and western aspect, the trees will
make rapid progress after two or three years. Road making
is easy, as the materials are good, and my Glen Mazeran
tenant, Clunas, is especially good at road making."
Then follows a statement of his intentions with regard
to the farming of the lower part of the strath, and the
letter ends in a strain of moralising very unusual with
the writer : —
" The garden promises to be a great success, and next year
we may expect to be well supplied with all kinds of vegetables
and fruit. . . . You will see by the date of this letter that it
is written on my birthday, and that on this day I am fifty
years old. To you this will almost appear the age of youth,
but to me it appears the commencement of old age. I scarcely
know why, but age seems to have stolen upon me unawares,
and taken me by a curious surprise. I sometimes think it is
because for many years my life was so fully occupied with
daily work that I had no time for retrospective and prospective
thought, but probably it is the case with all.
"For any measure of worldly success I may have had I
have to thank you, my dear father, for the early care you took
of my education, and the choice of my career, and the examples
you have always presented to me and to your children of truth-
fulness and strict integrity. May you yet be spared a little
longer with your clear intellect and great intelligence, and as
free from pain and every discomfort as is possible for you. . . ."
Together the estates of Braemore and Inverbroom
contain some 40,000 acres. For the most part the
land was wild heather and rock, destitute of trees
except in the lower parts of the strath, where, border-
ing on the rivers, there was a small stretch of arable
324 THE ENGINEER AT HOME
land. Mr. Fowler set to work with characteristic
energy to develop the resources and amenities of this
beautiful tract of country.
First he determined to have a view from his house.
He chose, therefore, a site on the spur of the mountains
that flank the valley of the Kiver Broom. It was a
daring adventure, even for a great engineer, and friends
were not wanting to hint that the aerial mansion would
be uninhabitable. The result, however, has fully
justified the effort. The wood has grown up, and the
house, being built fair and square, is warm and com-
fortable even in the wildest weather. The stables and
the gardens are situated directly below the mansion
house, on the level of the high-road. A winding road
of some miles in length and of easy gradients leads
from the high-road to the house, but a short, if some-
what precipitous, path runs straight down from the
house to the stables and gardens. The streams of the
mountain-side have been gathered into a loch some way
above the house, and utilised to furnish power for
electric light and other purposes.
The road which leads from Garve Station, on the
Ding wall and Skye Kail way, to Braemore runs for miles
through a desolate moor. There are traces, however,
everywhere, of a primaeval forest, a subject about which
Sir John Fowler was never weary of speculating.
Shortly before reaching the watershed between the
east and west of Scotland, we come on the Braemore
property, and as we pass the watershed and reach the
shores of Loch Drome, we see the first signs of Sir John
Fowler's experiment in re-afforesting the country. The
situation of the land at this point, though exposed
to the milder breezes of the west, has proved too-
CORRIE-HALLOCH, BRAEMORE.
To race page 325.
THE MAKING OF BRAEMOEE 325
high and wind-swept, and the plantations here have
not been so successful as lower down the valley, where
some 1,200 acres, which from time immemorial have
been bare mountain, are now successfully covered with
Scotch fir, larch, spruce, and hardwood. Altogether
some 9,000,000 of trees have been planted along the
strath. The contrast between the bare and dreary
country which the traveller passes on the ascent from
Garve, and the sylvan landscape into which he now
descends, is most enchanting.
The views from the house extend northwards down
the valley of the Broom to the sea loch of that name,
and towards the seaport of Ullapool, while to the
west the prospect stretches into the fastnesses of the
forest. In the immediate neighbourhood of the house
the zealous care of Sir John and Lady Fowler has
collected every variety of heath and of mountain tree
and shrub. Most wisely, even in the gardens, the
attempt has been abandoned to acclimatise exotics. No
effort, on the other hand, has been spared to realise,
under cultivation, the unsurpassable beauty of a High-
land mountain side.
The Eiver Broom for more than a mile of its course
runs in a precipitous gully, at places some 200 and
300 feet in depth. Across the river it has been the
congenial amusement of the engineer's holiday to
construct three " very handsome light iron bridges,"
one for carrying a roadway across into the forest, the
others footbridges to allow his visitors to see the
magnificent waterfall of Corrie Halloch and the wild
gorges of the river. From a point not far below
the house the river issues out of a succession of rocky
gullies to the open strath, and about four miles lower
326 THE ENGINEEK AT HOME
down flows into the tidal water of Loch Broom. Here,
on the river also, every device of which an engineer
can dream has been called into use to ornament and
improve the property. Embankments have been made,
and the adjoining land has been trenched and drained
and converted into pasture and arable field. Loch
Drome, the sheet of water which is passed at the head
of the valley on the road from Garve, has been increased
from 37 acres to about double that extent, by means
of an embankment at the lower end. This operation
has much improved the fishing in the loch. A small
flood in the river also can be assisted by opening
the sluices in this embankment, and the device goes
some way to realise the fisherman's paradise, in which
he can control his own " spates." It has been stated
in print that this artificial flood has been efficacious for
purposes of salmon fishing, but on this head we regret
to find that scepticism still prevails.
The Scottish Highlander, whether of high or low
degree, is not much inclined to welcome the Sassenach
settler with effusion, but Sir John Fowler and his
family very early succeeded in overcoming this clannish
exclusiveness. His neighbours magnanimously over-
looked his misfortune in not having been born a
Scotsman. At a dinner of the Scottish Corporation,
he told his hearers that he had done his best to be
a Scotsman. His worldly goods were mostly in Scot-
land. For forty years of his life he had never missed
spending his autumns in Scotland. His eldest son
resided there. His grandchildren were born there, and
wherever he went his heart was in the Highlands.
He had inquired as to the objects of the charity in
the support of which they were feasting, and had been
A HIGHLAND LAIRD 327
glad to learn that neither religion nor nationality was
a bar to membership, but he observed that only
Scotsmen were qualified to receive — a very good rule
—and he wished the Scottish Corporation all success.
Scotsmen have a great admiration for the man of
solid achievement, and they like their humour to be
served to them dry. Sir John Fowler succeeded
admirably in catching the tone of his adopted country.
As he passed, he had always a friendly greeting and
a pleasant jest for his humble neighbours. He built
good cottages, and was a kindly and improving land-
lord. His practical knowledge of farming and building
and generally of estate work won him the respect of
his tenants. "He knew," one of them remarked, "the
prices and quality of the material used in all such
operations as well as any of us. No one could get
the better of him in a bargain." The usual ignorance
of the cockney shooting tenant on such topics might
lead to profit, but not to popularity. The shrewd,
capable, and liberal landlord was a more congenial
personage. His knowledge and keen business habits
seconded and encouraged the industry of his tenants.
In a word, he recognised that there was a business side
to the duties of a landlord, and very faithfully he
performed his share of the contract.
Visitors would occasionally appear from yachts, storm-
staid on the coast. At one time it was Mr. W. H.
Smith and at another Lord Kosebery who came over
from Ullapool to see the sylvan fairyland which the
laird of Braemore had created on the barren mountain
side. But for the most part, in a sparsely populated
region like Ross-shire, the occupants of the great
houses are necessarily dependent for society on their
328 THE ENGINEEK AT HOME
own visitors. The hospitality of Braemore was among
Sir John's principal pleasures. There came to Brae-
more, year after year, a long succession of visitors,
and for them the greatest variety of entertainment
was provided. The company was not exclusively
composed of sportsmen. Indeed, a confidential talk
with McHardy, who for thirty years was head-keeper
and stalker, and trusted friend of the family, has left
the impression that the sportsmanlike prowess of the
visitors varied inversely to their distinction in other
fields of fame. A visitors' book with ample margin
contains a record of distinguished names. Great
artists — Landseer and Millais — have adorned the pages
with charming sketches in reminiscence of pleasant
days spent in the forest or on the loch. High
ecclesiastics and statesmen contributed to the volume
appropriate sentiments in prose and verse.
"When the dull, dreary session is over, and patriots twaddle no
more,
How blithely I breathe the brave breezes which blow round the
braes of Braemore !
Though the Broom like our Gladstone meanders, or foams down
with froth in a spate,
Though the stalker, like Dizzy in ambush, for his prey is aye
lying in wait,
Yet here may we cast away care," &c. &c.
So sings a distinguished statesman who is not gene-
rally associated in the minds of his countrymen with
the pursuit of the muses.
For the fishermen there was a stretch of four miles
of salmon river, and many lochs in which trout
abounded. On the low ground of the forest a good
day's grouse shooting was to be had, and some four miles
THE RECREATIONS OF A STATESMAN.
SIR WILLIAM V. HAKCOURT, by SIR J. E. MILLAIS, P.R.A.
(From the Visitors' Book at Braemore).
To face page 328.
A YACHTSMAN 329
away, at the head of Loch Broom, Sir John's yacht
was moored, and especially during his later years it
was his delight to organise a water picnic for a party
of congenial friends.
Sir John at different times owned three yachts,
each of them named The Southern Cross, after the
constellation which so delighted him during his stay
in Egypt. His first yacht was built for him in 1878.
Some years later he bought a 350-ton yacht, in which
he visited the Mediterranean and cruised among the
islands of the Greek archipelago. This was in later
years replaced by a smaller and handier craft, more
suitable for the work required of it in the bays and
narrow channels of the Scottish coast. He was elected
a member of the Eoyal Yacht Squadron, a social dis-
tinction much prized by those who, for their pleasure,
go down to the sea in ships.
Last, but of course not least, there was the deer
forest — that sport of kings. Sir John himself was a
keen deer stalker ; indeed, to him all other sports
except salmon fishing were matters indifferent. In
later years he rarely fired a gun at a grouse or threw
a fly for a trout, and he took no interest in the big
battues, common in south country sport. Notwith-
standing this somewhat exclusive taste, Sir John was
emphatically what is called " a good sportsman," a
phrase of talismanic import to the initiated. There
are presumably varieties of "good sportsmen." There
is the man who, whether born in the palace or in
the cottage, has obviously been intended by Provi-
dence for a gamekeeper, who lives on affectionate
terms with ferrets, and who, in default of higher
quarry, will take part with enthusiasm in a rat hunt.
330 THE ENGINEER AT HOME
Sport with Sir John was a less absorbing interest ;
he liked only the best of it, and he took a pride in
seeing that everything was properly done.
Sport, however, was not his sole interest at Braemore.
He was always very fond of getting experts to talk to
him on their own subjects. Geological rambles with
Sir Koderick Murchison were red-letter days to him.
The following entry in the Visitors' Book at
Braemore shows that the interest of these rambles
was highly valued by that great geologist himself:—
" Adieu, Braemore ! " he writes, " where the cordial reception
of the kind host and hostess have made an indelible impression
on the heart of the old Silurian !
" Forty-two years have elapsed since, when in company with
Professor Sedgwick, I hammered the rocks at Ullapool, and
now, by the active assistance of Mr. Fowler and the aid of
his handy steam yacht, I have been enabled to place all the
great rock formations which are exposed on the shores of
Loch Broom in their true order of age and succession, from
my fundamental gneiss (hodie Laurentiari), through the grand
massive Cambrian rocks of Ben More, the lower Silurian
quartz rocks and limestone of Ullapool, up to the overlying
gneiss of Braemore (metamorphic lower Silurian), on which
the mansion stands, and from which, looking northwards, the
spectator commands in one unrivalled view all this glorious
geological series. — August 21st, 1869."
His lifelong friendship with Sir Eichard Owen gave
him similar occasions of discussing the conditions of
prehistoric life. One excursion which the two friends
took together resulted in a trophy of national interest.
"You remember," writes Professor Owen, "our excursion
to Sandside! The skeleton of that whale now forms the
chief feature in the grand hall of the new museum (the Natural
History Museum at South Kensington), and I am daily gratified
by the interest with which it is inspected."
HIS VISITORS 331
To Braemore also came the extremes of political
parties — Sir AVilliam Harcourt, whose acquaintance
and friendship had been made in parliamentary
committee -rooms, Earl Cairns, the great Conservative
Lord Chancellor, the veteran statesman Lord Cran-
brook, and other notabilities, too long a list to narrate.
On Friday, August llth, 1871, there is a pathetic
signature in blue indelible pencil, with regard to which
Sir Kichard Owen writes in his journal :—
" I am now the only guest. Lady Ashburton and T. Carlyle
drove over and took tea with us. ... He is much emaciated,
can digest but little, and hardly gets any sleep. He was most
friendly, and, I thought, took his last leave of me at parting.
. . . He painfully with a pencil put his name in the Visitors'
Book."
Professional friends, his partners Sir Benjamin
Baker and Mr. Baldry, usually gave a few days of
their holidays to a visit at Braemore. His old anta-
gonist— now Field -Marshal — Sir Lintorn Simmons,
was also a regular summer guest. Here, too, came
Prince Hassan, son of Ismail the Khedive, at that time
a student at the University of Oxford. Professor
Owen records in his diary under date, August 20th,
1871, that the Prince
"has quite fallen into English ways, and speaks English
perfectly. On Monday he made his first stalk on the
mountains, and was so excited by the thought of it that he
threw all the cushions about in the drawing-room ! "
Archbishops and bishops, and lesser ecclesiastical
dignitaries such as deans and archdeacons, as well
as eminent laymen from many varied walks of life,
abounded, all eager to please and to be pleased, for
so the kindty wizard of the mountain ordered.
332 THE ENGINEER AT HOME
When the labours of the day were over, the party
met at dinner in the highest good humour. It was
holiday time with all. The railway station, that
portal of dull care, was more than 20 miles distant,
the scenery was enchanting, and the day's sport had
been invigorating ; everything was propitious for the
relaxation of frank and cheerful talk. Each member
of the company had something worth hearing to say.
The Field-Marshal had anecdotes of the secret history
of the Crimean War, or of Lord Beaconsfield at the
Berlin Conference. It was an hour at which even an
archbishop might be indiscreet. All this was a sincere
pleasure to the genial host.
The late Archbishop of Canterbury, to whom Sir
John's son Montague was for a time domestic chaplain
and assistant secretary, was a frequent and welcome
guest. The Archbishop had at first excused himself
from accepting an invitation to Braemore on the
ground that he liked to spend his holiday with his
family. Sir John, however, was not to be denied,
and as the Archbishop and Mrs. Benson would not leave
their children, he invited all the children to accompany
them. So it came about that the whole family on
more than one occasion passed several happy weeks at
Braemore. Mr. Arthur Benson, the archbishop's son and
biographer, has obligingly sent the following pleasing
and authentic picture of the life at Braemore.
" Sir John Fowler, as I first remember him, was a strongly-
built man, with large, rough-hewn features. His whole face
spoke of work — hard, practical work. He evidently never
gave his personal appearance a thought. He dressed in loosely-
fitting clothes; he was becoming bald, and his strong hair,
which he wore long, stood out stiffly from the back of his
A VISITOE'S EEMINISCENCE 333
head; he was clean-shaven, with the exception of rough
whiskers and a small beard under his chin; the somewhat
downright expression of his full, mobile lips, often pursed
in thought, his big nose, his full-blooded complexion, was
humanised by the genial and kindly glance of his light-
coloured eyes. He would have despised any elegance of
motion, hand, or demeanour, and his brusque gestures and
walk would have been almost clumsy but for the dignity of
strength which characterised all he did. At the same time, he
was a man of quick and sensitive emotions, which contrasted
strongly with his bluff exterior. I have often seen his eyes
fill suddenly with tears, which he would brush away with his
hand, and his voice falter when he talked of anyone, and there
were many, who were dear to him. I remember that when
I first saw him in Scotland, in an old brown shooting-coat, he
seemed to me at once to move with greater simplicity and ease
than in formal London garments. In the evenings in Scotland
he wore a velvet suit with knickerbockers and purple stockings,
in which I used to fancy he looked like a benevolent artist.
But this dress, which might have seemed post in some men, only
appeared in his case natural and without calculated effect. . . »
" Sir John Fowler's gift of hospitality was very great. To
hit the exact mean in entertaining guests requires a natural
talent. It is possible to leave them so much alone that they
feel neglected, or to fill the day with a ceaseless round of
engagements, until weariness results. At Braemore everything
was perfectly organised; there was no sense of proprietorship
about Sir John : he sate like a guest among his guests ; and yet
every day was laid out. As soon as breakfast was over he
would say what he proposed: he would tell my father that
he would leave him free till luncheon, and then he would take
him for a ride in the forest to see the deer at home. Then came
the turn of each of us. Lady Fowler, of whose delicate and un-
obtrusive kindliness I may not here further speak, would be at my
mother's disposal. Then my sisters were provided for ; gillies
placed at the disposal of myself and my brothers, and I do not
recollect a single day upon which Sir John had not some plan
334 THE ENGINEEK AT HOME
for my youngest brother, then a schoolboy of fourteen. He
certainly delighted in making these arrangements, but they
were never forced upon anyone, and if a preference was
expressed, matters were at once skilfully accommodated. I do
not remember that he took much physical exercise himself. I
remember his occasionally stalking a deer, and once or twice he
took a salmon-rod to the river. He was a successful sports-
man, but he knew that my father had little sympathy for any
kind of sport, and a deep-rooted objection to depriving any
creature of the inestimable privilege of life, and so, though the
younger members of the party were amply provided with
fishing and stalking, yet the fact was never obtruded.
" I imagine that he must have done a great deal of professional
work in the course of the day, but it was all kept very much out
of sight. He was fond of sending and receiving long telegrams ;
more than once I remember some interesting news arriving
from town on telegrams covering four or five sheets. . . .
" He had a strong vein of humour, and I can remember his
relating with high relish how he had been badgered in some
important case before a Parliamentary Committee by an
eminent Q.C., who asked him all kinds of ingenious questions,
which, though bearing little on the matter in hand, were yet
difficult to answer satisfactorily. ' Now, Mr. Fowler/ said the
counsel, ' let me ask you this. Supposing two of the largest
vessels in Her Majesty's fleet were to collide beneath this
structure of yours, what would be the result? Let us have
a candid answer.' ' I imagine/ said Sir John, ' that both the
captains would be dismissed from the service for gross in-
competence.' The Forth Bridge was then in course of con-
struction, and though Sir John must have been tired enough of
being questioned about it, he was always ready to give some
of the astounding figures connected with the materials used in
the construction. One day at luncheon he explained the
principle of cantilevers with a piece of paper and a pencil,
illustrating it with a cork and a pair of forks, with a precision
and brevity which astonished me. I can only say that, with
no mechanical predilections, I have never forgotten it. ...
SIR JOHN FOWLER AND HIS ELDEST GRANDSON.
To face page 335.
HIS ADMIRATION OF INTELLECT 335
" To my mother on another occasion he spoke of the delight
he took in managing men. ' It is the greatest pleasure in the
world,' he said, 'to have a thoroughly capable man to deal
with, who is at the same time very difficult to manage, so that
you have to try all the flies in your book. I never allow myself
to be beaten, and there is nothing in the world I enjoy more.' "
The secret of all true courtesy and hospitality is the
desire to please and to be pleased. At Braemore these
conditions were thoroughly fulfilled. The result was
an all-pervading atmosphere of genial enjoyment which
none could resist.
Sir John had, we are informed by a competent
observer, a curious habit of taking stock of strangers.
It consisted of "drawing" them on their special
subjects. He was at pains, at first at all events, to
conceal any imperfections there might be in his own
knowledge of the question discussed. The problem in
his mind seemed to be, " Is this man an impostor, or
is he not ? " The ordeal of examination, of which the
victim was probably quite unconscious, was often some-
what searching, but at length the dossier of the
examined was silently put away for future use in some
mental pigeon-hole. Nothing in most cases came of
this appraisal of men. His verdicts, however, were
sometimes communicated to those in his confidence,
and were seldom far from the truth. It was an object
with him to know who were the leading intellects in
every sphere of human activity, and his position in
society gave him frequent opportunity of indulging this
foible. Like all men of kindly disposition, he was
devoted to children. Yet even in his intercourse with
them, he showed the same keen desire to discover talent
and to watch its development. An almost exaggerated
336 THE ENGINEEE AT HOME
respect for intellectual ability was a marked character-
istic of his mind.
We have left for the last chapter all reference to
Sir John's political opinions. We have merely noted
that he was a strong Conservative. In 1879, at an age
when a prominent parliamentary career was no longer
probable, he was selected to contest Tewkesbury in that
interest. Lord Beaconsfield had recently returned from
Berlin bringing peace with honour, and the next election
was to be fought in the light of that event. A speech
which he delivered early in January to the electors
contains a statement of his political creed.
He was keenly in favour of a forward foreign policy
in Egypt and on the Indian frontier, and much opposed
to the masterly inactivity which was being recom-
mended in other quarters. He would do all in his
power to improve the health and education and comfort
of the people, but he was against revolutionary changes,
disestablishment, and, to use his own phrase, " depriving
a poor man of his beer."
Like all men of his generation, he was a staunch
believer in self-help. Though, as already noticed in
quotations from his article on railway accidents, he was
very far removed from the doctrinaire opponents of
Government regulation, he yet retained that attitude
of suspicion and dislike towards Government inter-
ference which was characteristic of the Liberalism of
an earlier period. It cannot, however, be said that he
was altogether consistent in his political principles.
In the short period of his Hallamshire candidature he
seems to have been not disinclined to dally with those
who favoured that very serious form of Government
interference known as fair trade or protection. His turn
POLITICAL VIEWS 337
of mind was practical rather than theoretic, and we are
informed, that from practical considerations he accepted
as inevitable for England the policy of Free Trade.
Indeed, except on the subject of Egypt, we doubt
if he really was much interested in politics. His
orderly mind hated the confusion and anarchy caused
by Mr. Gladstone's abnegation of responsibility for the
well-being and progress of the Egyptian Soudan. The
bungling, which in practical matters is apt to attend
the indecision of the philosophic temperament, was
abhorrent to him. The Titan might be weary of the
burden of empire, but in John Fowler's view he must
not decline his allotted task. His professional con-
nection with Egypt gave additional emphasis to this
criticism. For the rest, it appears to us, that he
adopted the policy of the party to which he belonged
very much in the same spirit as he accepted the verdict
of experts on scientific problems with which he was
not personally conversant. His vehemence of ex-
pression was not so much a sign of enthusiasm as of
the latent energy which characterised all he did. To
the theoretical aspect of politics he does not seem to
have given much attention.
The following letters addressed to the Times on the
subject of the rescue of Gordon seem worthy of being
put on record. They were at the time an original and
weighty contribution to political controversy.
"THE SITUATION IN EGYPT.
" To the Editor of ' The Times? April 30th, 1884.
"SiR, — I have hitherto resisted great pressure from many
friends deeply interested in Egyptian affairs, and have refrained
from any public expression of opinion on the great problem
which has long agitated all classes in England ; but the position
z
338 THE ENGINEEK AT HOME
is now so critical that I feel a duty is imposed upon all those
who, like myself, have had long and intimate knowledge of
Egypt, to speak plainly their views without reserve or delay.
It would be idle and useless to enumerate the incidents which
have led to the present deplorable state of things, although at
some future time, less urgent than the present, a valuable
lesson may be learnt from them, and therefore I will at once
proceed to set forth in a few words the warning I desire to
convey. Throughout England a cry has arisen that Gordon
must be rescued at any cost, if possible, from the perilous
position into which his noble nature has led him, and it is now
proposed to make the attempt. I venture no opinion on the
mode of making this attempt, but I do emphatically say, from
my knowledge of the people and the country, that before any
further step is taken involving English blood and treasure,
England must distinctly and unequivocally state her intentions
and future policy with regard to Egypt. I have every reason
to believe that if England would even now plainly declare
throughout Egypt that circumstances had imposed upon her
the responsibility of the security and good government of the
country, and that she had determined to assume that responsi-
bility, all serious difficulties would soon vanish and danger to
Gordon be averted.
" No mistake can be greater, in my opinion, than to suppose
that such a course would involve either greater expenditure or
greater military exertion than the policy of the past, which,
if continued, would, I fear, lead to continued humiliation and
certain failure. On the contrary, I believe that if we promptly
declared our intention to assume the responsibility which
everyone personally acquainted with the country must know
to be inevitable, we should find an expedition up the Nile
would be received with welcome and not resisted.
"The Egyptian people are easily governed if treated with
kindness and justice, as they would be under an English
administration, and all Europeans, without exception, would
profit by the establishment of such a stable government if
felt and known to be continuous and permanent, which is an
LETTERS TO "THE TIMES" 339
essential condition of success. I refrain from any suggestions
respecting details of administration or improvement and de-
velopment of the country, which I have had unusual oppor-
tunities of studying, because I desire to limit myself at this
time to the expression of an earnest hope that no further steps
will be taken by England in Egypt, either defensive or offensive,
until a distinct policy has been pronounced, so that the people
in every part may know the Government which they have to
obey, and by which they will be protected.
" I am, Sir, your obedient servant,
" JOHN FOWLER.
"No. 2, QUEEN SQUARE PLACE, WESTMINSTER."
" To the Editor of ' The Times,' May 1th, 1884.
" SIR, — I make no apology for presuming to occupy a little
more of your space on Egyptian affairs. The rapidly advancing
and already impending dangers in Egypt are not, I fear,
generally understood in England, to their full extent, and,
strange to say, they seem to be the least recognised in any
sufficient degree in the House of Commons.
" Official and semi-official reports of the last few days
announce a startling increase of excitement and of insolent
defiance of authority in Upper Egypt, and private letters from
trustworthy sources confirm these reports, and consider them
to understate the real facts of the case.
"A correspondent who has been more than twenty years in
Egypt, with unusual opportunities of knowing the feelings of
the natives, and for whose perfect reliability I can personally
vouch, writes as follows : —
" * We have been going from bad to worse, and now we are
in a state of anarchy. Eobberies are being committed in the
provincial towns in the face of day, because there is nothing
to prevent it. The old police were bad, and have been
abolished, but they were of some use, and nothing has been
put in their place. Burglaries and shooting from behind
hedges is increasing and will increase, and lately an attempt
by the authorities to suppress a mischievous newspaper was
340 THE ENGINEER AT HOME
met by defiance ; and so things move on. Meanwhile the poor
country suffers.'
" Yes, that is just it, ' and so things move on/ and so they
must, so long as we remain in the position of temporary ' care-
takers ' ; for we are really nothing else, and we are doing great
and daily injury to Egypt and ourselves by a continuance in
this anomalous position.
"The long, interesting letter of Sir Samuel Baker in The
Times of the 30th of April, sets forth in great detail, and with
the advantage of full local knowledge, the measures which he
considers necessary for military success and the establishment
of English authority. It is not probable that the time, men,
and money required for his proposal will be available, but the
proposal itself is a remarkable proof of the consequences which
we have already incurred by neglected duties.
"If we discard as impracticable, which I think we may,
such proposals as abandoning Egypt to take care of itself, or
return to dual, or still more divided, control, and Sir Samuel
Baker's scheme, there remains only the policy which alone
was the possible one after we once went to Egypt to put down
rebellion — viz. the acceptance of full responsibility of security
to life and property, and the good government of the people.
"If we were not prepared for this we had no business to
go to Egypt alone as we did. With regard to withdrawal,
even that miserable step would be better than a continuance
of our present aimless, do-nothing policy, and probably we
could withdraw now, while if we wait longer we may meet
the fate we have recklessly and persistently tempted.
" No such disgrace, however, is necessary, nor what is called
'the abandonment of the Soudan/ which means nothing less
than leaving to anarchy and slavery a vast district capable
of cultivation and of gradual civilisation, and almost com-
pelling it to remain a perpetual menace to Egypt proper.
A few years ago I had numerous engineers and surveyors
engaged during two seasons in Darfur, as far as the capital
El Fashr, in various parts of Kordofan, and also to Shendy
and Khartoum, and during that long period, and over many
LETTEKS TO "THE TIMES" 341
hundreds of miles of country, no trouble whatever was
experienced with the natives. They were well aware that
our objects were peaceable and intended for their good, and
that we were under the protection of a real Power at Cairo,
which they recognised and respected.
"During this time I was in constant communication with
Gordon Pasha, both in Cairo and when he was in Khartoum,
and in various parts of Kordofan and Darfur, and certainly
nothing was further from his views at that time than 'the
abandonment of the Soudan.' On the contrary, he was a
warm advocate for its development and peaceable settlement,
and explained to me his plans for securing permanent frontiers
on the side of Abyssinia and also to the south and west.
These plans and his general views appeared to me admirable,
and calculated to lead to the total extinction of slavery, but
they were based, or they would have been futile, on a con-
tinuance of regular government and adequate authority.
"At that time neither Egyptian nor English prestige had
been lost, and therefore authority was easily maintained.
We have foolishly thrown away and temporarily lost this
precious prestige, and there is no escape from paying the
inevitable penalty to regain it.
" Practically, whether we like it or not, we cannot withdraw
from Egypt nor abandon the Soudan. We are now there, and
if we were to withdraw, some other first-rate Power would
attempt to take our place ; but the European Powers generally
would never permit it, because England alone possesses in-
terests sufficient to afford full security to all other Powers
that an open route through Egypt and the Suez Canal shall
always be securely maintained.
" Concurrently, however, with the clear enunciation of our
intention to be the responsible custodians of Egypt, must
appear to the people of that country our determination to
preserve them from oppression, develop their resources, and
employ them in all possible cases in the various administra-
tions of government. Then, and not till then, we may safely
proceed to send relief and other expeditions up the Nile
342 THE ENGIKEEK AT HOME
Valley, which I venture to predict will receive a welcome
as they proceed, provided, of course, the people thoroughly
understand that we are now their responsible protectors.
" JOHN FOWLER.
" 2, QUEEN SQUARE PLACE, WESTMINSTER."
" To the Editor of ' The Times? May 21s£, 1884.
"SiR, — It is no longer possible to withstand the over-
whelming and almost universal feeling in and out of
Parliament that something effectual must be done, and
without further delay, to rescue Gordon and England. The
danger to be guarded against at the present moment is rather
that in the impatient and excitable state of the public mind
on the subject a mistake may be made in the scheme of
rescue.
" It is indispensable, however, as a first step, that we should
distinctly recognise the fact that no expedition for the relief
of Gordon, however costly in men and money, could possibly
reach Khartoum in time to accomplish its object, unless
preceded by an authoritative proclamation of our intention
to assume undivided and continuous responsibility and autho-
rity in Egypt.
"The generous offers of money and personal services you
have received indicate the extent and depth of sympathy and
shame which exist ; but care must be taken that neither these
volunteer nor official efforts are expended in a wrong direction,
and it is in that view I venture to occupy once more a little
of your space.
" One proposal which is recommended is for constructing
a railway across the desert from Suakin to Berber. I venture
to say that such a work would be a great mistake, because
not only would it be exceedingly costly and difficult by reason
of the general character of the desert and the mountain range
which has to be surmounted, but it would leave completely
unprotected and undeveloped the whole of the Nile Valley
between Berber and Wady Haifa, which includes Dongola and
Dabbe, the caravan entrances to Kordofan. Egypt has already
LETTEES TO "THE TIMES" 343
had experience of railways constructed across waterless deserts
in the line from Cairo to Suez, which was taken up and
abandoned after struggling for some years against the ruinous
loss of its working and its comparative inutility.
"It would be an advantage in every way, in my opinion,
if Egypt was limited to the valley and delta of the Nile,
and if the present opportunity was taken for the settlement
of boundaries between Egypt and Abyssinia, and their strict
observance secured effectually by the conditional transfer to
Abyssinia of one or more much -cove ted ports on the Eed
Sea. By this arrangement, and thus being able to confine
operations in Egypt to the Nile Valley, the steps to be taken
are simple, and attended with little or no risk. The value
of the Nile for navigation greatly varies in different parts
of the river, and at different periods of the year, and although
rocky obstructions or cataracts are numerous in some parts,
there are also long stretches of water which can be used
advantageously as water carriage only.
" The experience I have gained in Egypt leads me to suggest
and strongly recommend the immediate completion of a
communication, partly by railway and partly by water,
between Wady Haifa and Khartoum. From Cairo to Wady
Haifa the existing route, partly railway and partly river, is
fairly satisfactory, and may be further improved as regards the
river by a short ship incline at Assouan and the removal of a
few obstructions between Assouan and Wady Haifa, which
I estimated, after careful investigation, at £3,000 a year for a
few years. From Wady Haifa southward the more serious
works commence, and from actual examination it was found
that as far as Hannek (the Third Cataract), a distance of 200
miles, the river consisted of a succession of obstructions which
render it useless for ordinary traffic. Over this ground, there-
fore, it would be necessary to lay down a railway, but the
sections and surveys show that very little cutting or embank-
ment would be required, and about 50 miles have already been
completed. From Hannek the Eiver Nile, by way of New
Dongola, Handak, Old Dongola, and Dabbe to Ambukol, a
344
THE ENGINEER AT HOME
distance of about 170 miles, can be again used as the means of
communication, and although some rocky obstructions exist
they may be gradually removed and the navigation improved
as the traffic increases.
"Ambukol is known as the point where the Nile makes
a vast bend to the east, round by Aboo Hammed (where the
Korosko desert route joins the Nile), Berber, and Shendy to
Khartoum, and not only does this bend of the river involve
a great additional length as compared with a direct line, but
it [is so much interrupted by cataracts and rapids between
Ambukol and Berber as to make it necessary to leave the
river at Ambukol and make a railway direct to Khartoum
through the Wady Mokatten, which is peculiarly favourable
in every respect for the purpose.
"My proposition, then, would be to concentrate all rescue
efforts for the present, both military and otherwise, to the
improvement of the communication up the Nile to Khartoum,
and with the view of saving time and money and being
thoroughly prepared for vigorous proceedings in the early
autumn, provide, without delay, special steamers and lighters
for the river service, and rails, sleepers, locomotives, and other
appliances for the railway works. The total length of railway
to be made would be about 335 miles, and of river to be
supplied with steamers and lighters about 200 miles, and the
cost may be safely assumed to be within £2,000,000, including
all materials, carriage, and labour, and the payment of native
labour.
" Unlike all expeditions and expenditure purely military,
the result of the expenditure and work I recommend would be
available for all time as the means of encouraging trade and
promoting civilisation, and during its construction it would
largely employ natives who are much in need of the food they
would receive.
"In September and October the steamers and all other
materials may be ready, and as the Nile would be in flood, may
ascend to their different destinations, and the works would
then proceed rapidly.
CANDIDATE FOE HALLAMSHIKE 345
" The peculiar advantage of Khartoum is sufficiently known,
being at the junction of the Blue and White Niles, and in
the centre of communication with Berber ; indeed it would be
impossible to exaggerate the value of a position which possesses
such advantages. I feel this proposal is wanting in the dash
and magnificence of other suggestions, but I know it to be
practicable, and I believe it to be more economical, certain,
and even more rapid than any other scheme.
"JOHN FOWLER.
"2, QUEEN SQUAEE PLACE, WESTMINSTER."
In 1885 he was selected as Conservative candidate
for Hallamshire, his native district of Yorkshire. On
this occasion, as before, his chief line of attack on the
Gladstonian party was an indictment of their foreign
policy, more particularly their abandonment of the
Soudan to anarchy and chaos.
The work of canvassing a large and populous division
was soon found by him to be a great tax on his
strength, and he very wisely, on the advice of his
doctor, withdrew from the contest. The reader will
agree with the congratulations sent to him by Mr.
Dent, one of the directors of the Forth Bridge Railway
Company.
" DEAR SIR JOHN," he writes, "... I am very glad that you
have given up Hallamshire ; the successful finish of the Forth
Bridge is a greater crown to a man's life than a seat in
Parliament."
His political campaigns, although never resulting in
his return to Parliament, were in their way very
successful. Although in private conversation he was
wont to condemn his political adversaries with con-
siderable vehemence, when he took the field as a
candidate he rose to the occasion and put great control
346
THE ENGINEER AT HOME
on his habit of passionate utterance. The Tewkesbury
election of 1880 was conducted with complete good
temper. The defeated candidate was hardly less
popular than his successful rival. His carriage was
drawn to the station amid the cheers of both parties.
Though he did not secure their votes, he earned their
regard and respect.
All who knew Sir John will remember this very
human contradiction in his character. In his less
guarded moments he was apt to be impulsive,
passionate, and even arbitrary, full of the character-
istics of the spoiled child of fortune. Such foibles,
when combined with a real kindliness of heart, merely
supply the light and shadow which endear men to
their friends. Fortunately for us all, friendship goes
by favour. There is probably nothing less provocative
of affection than that managed character in which all
spontaneity has been suppressed by a too rigid self-
discipline.
It was a peculiarity of Fowler's frank and vehement
nature that he could put himself under discipline when
he had some great objective in view. He was not a
man with whom friends, who happened to differ from
him, liked to talk politics. The warmth of his invec-
tive was apt to be contagious. When he went elec-
tioneering, however, he was respectful to opponents,
though their views, to his mind, were not a little dis-
ordered. In private he did not suffer fools gladly,
but he had the capacity for taking infinite trouble to
persuade them, when he met them on parliamentary
committees or boards of directors. He was most
careful to prepare his speeches beforehand, and when
important letters had to be written he would reject
THE CKOFTEB QUESTION 347
draft after draft till he had got it quite right. He
had, in fact, that great element of genius, a capacity
for taking pains.
As a Highland landlord, he naturally took an
interest in that most important political and economic
problem, the future of the crofter population. In
a speech addressed to the annual reunion of the
natives of Koss and Cromarty, held, significantly
enough, not in Eoss or Cromarty, but in Glasgow, in
December, 1885, Sir John touched on this vexed
question : —
" Let me begin," he said, " by speaking of landlords as I
would of babies, that as they are inevitable it is best to be
kind to them. But I go further and say landlords are
desirable, and especially in mountainous and thinly-populated
countries, because it is well to have educated men and women
in every district, and also because large and comprehensive
works of improvement can only be carried out by their means.
Landlords also have their friends who visit them and enjoy
intercourse with the natives to the advantage of both. Of
course it is essential that a landlord should be properly
equipped for his duties in a knowledge of the work he has
to do. At Braemore I have had the responsible duties of
a landlord for twenty years, and during that time I have
done much work and made many mistakes. I have, however,
succeeded in improving all the arable land in the strath, so
that it will now produce at least three times the food it was
capable of producing when I first went to Braemore. . . .
But a landlord must have tenants, and it so happens that I
have at Braemore a large farmer, a small farmer, and crofters.
My large farmer is my son. . . . My small farmer is Mr.
Chisholm, who is the best road-maker in the north, and his
wife has the largest family of small children, and feeds the
biggest chickens of any woman in the Highlands. Their
elder sons have wisely either emigrated or migrated. Two
346 THE ENGINEEK AT HOME
on his habit of passionate utterance. The Tewkesbury
election of 1880 was conducted with complete good
temper. The defeated candidate was hardly less
popular than his successful rival. His carriage was
drawn to the station amid the cheers of both parties.
Though he did not secure their votes, he earned their
regard and respect.
All who knew Sir John will remember this very
human contradiction in his character. In his less
guarded moments he was apt to be impulsive,
passionate, and even arbitrary, full of the character-
istics of the spoiled child of fortune. Such foibles,
when combined with a real kindliness of heart, merely
supply the light and shadow which endear men to
their friends. Fortunately for us all, friendship goes
by favour. There is probably nothing less provocative
of affection than that managed character in which all
spontaneity has been suppressed by a too rigid self-
discipline.
It was a peculiarity of Fowler's frank and vehement
nature that he could put himself under discipline when
he had some great objective in view. He was not a
man with whom friends, who happened to differ from
him, liked to talk politics. The warmth of his invec-
tive was apt to be contagious. When he went elec-
tioneering, however, he was respectful to opponents,
though their views, to his mind, were not a little dis-
ordered. In private he did not suffer fools gladly,
but he had the capacity for taking infinite trouble to
persuade them, when he met them on parliamentary
committees or boards of directors. He was most
careful to prepare his speeches beforehand, and when
important letters had to be written he would reject
THE CKOFTEK QUESTION 347
draft after draft till he had got it quite right. He
had, in fact, that great element of genius, a capacity
for taking pains.
As a Highland landlord, he naturally took an
interest in that most important political and economic
problem, the future of the crofter population. In
a speech addressed to the annual reunion of the
natives of Ross and Cromarty, held, significantly
enough, not in Ross or Cromarty, but in Glasgow, in
December, 1885, Sir John touched on this vexed
question :—
" Let me begin," he said, " by speaking of landlords as I
would of babies, that as they are inevitable it is best to be
kind to them. But I go further and say landlords are
desirable, and especially in mountainous and thinly -populated
countries, because it is well to have educated men and women
in every district, and also because large and comprehensive
works of improvement can only be carried out by their means.
Landlords also have their friends who visit them and enjoy
intercourse with the natives to the advantage of both. Of
course it is essential that a landlord should be properly
equipped for his duties in a knowledge of the work he has
to do. At Braemore I have had the responsible duties of
a landlord for twenty years, and during that time I have
done much work and made many mistakes. I have, however,
succeeded in improving all the arable land in the strath, so
that it will now produce at least three times the food it was
capable of producing when I first went to Braemore. . . .
But a landlord must have tenants, and it so happens that I
have at Braemore a large farmer, a small farmer, and crofters.
My large farmer is my son. . . . My small farmer is Mr.
Chisholm, who is the best road-maker in the north, and his
wife has the largest family of small children, and feeds the
biggest chickens of any woman in the Highlands. Their
elder sons have wisely either emigrated or migrated. Two
348 THE ENGINEEE AT HOME
of them are, I believe, with us to-night, and are doing well
in Glasgow. At Braemore I have also crofters, but fortunately
for themselves and for me they all earn money outside their
crofts, and the croft is valuable to give food for their cow
and vegetables for the family. From a long experience of
the Highlands, I am much disposed to think that many of
the difficulties and differences which exist are due to want
of accurate knowledge on the part of those who give opinions
and interfere in these questions. I will give you two re-
markable instances of this in my own experience. Some years
ago a friend of mine,* a liberal, philanthropic man, and a
member of Parliament, came to see me at Braemore. He
had never been in the Highlands before, but he had been
making speeches and writing articles on the millions of acres
of land in the Highlands, which if cultivated would grow
unlimited food for the people, but was now wasted on sheep,
cattle, deer, and wild cats. Well, I took him over the
property, and he saw for himself, and was satisfied that not
one hundredth part of the ground was capable of the
cultivation he had expected, and he found that every yard
of ground which was cultivable was cultivated. He was
astonished, but he was honest, good, and true, and he thanked
me again and again for saving him from repeating his mis-
takes ; and yet to this day you hear constantly from ignorant
or mischievous persons the same gross misstatements. Another
mischievous misstatement is with respect to deer forests, as
if all the land of the high mountains of the Highlands would
produce mutton or beef. Now it so happens that adjoining
a part of my property at Braemore is the property of Inverlael,
which has long been in the hands of my excellent neighbour,
Mr. Walter Mundell, as a sheep farm. A great portion of
Inverlael is more than 2,000 feet above the level of the sea,
and some parts more than 3,000 feet. Probably a more
competent and experienced farmer does not exist than Mr.
Walter Mundell, and yet the high death-rate of his sheep
on that elevated ground, combined with a long continuance
* The late Mr. Samuel Morley.
DEEE FORESTS 349
of low prices, rendered it quite impossible for him to continue
it as a sheep farm without destructive loss, and of course such
ground was far too high for cattle. Now as a practical
common-sense question, what is the proper course to adopt
in such a case? Is the land to be abandoned and remain
useless to the landlord, and afford no employment to the
people, or to be let as a deer forest, and bring employment
and other advantages with it ? Surely there can be only one
answer to such a question. Well, ladies and gentlemen, we
have seen how landlords, sheep farmers, and crofters may be
comfortable in Eoss-shire, and of course in other places also,
and we have seen that Highlanders may prosper in our
colonies, and we know that they prosper in Glasgow and
London and all the great cities of Great Britain, and there
is ample room for all the surplus population. Now, don't
you think that under these circumstances that wise heads
and kind hearts ought to be found to settle all differences
which now unfortunately exist in the Highlands ? "
A practical summing up of the question which seems
to us to leave little more to be said.
As a master and employer of labour Sir John Fowler
was very popular. Many proofs of this have been forth-
coming in a quite spontaneous manner. " I was over
thirty years in his service," said one trusted servant
at Braemore, " and I do not think I ever had a cross
word from him. Indeed, he was more like a father
to me than a master." The same informant dwelt with
warm appreciation on the interesting talks he had had
with his master in their long walks in the forest.
No one is more capable of valuing such glimpses of
the great world than the intelligent Highlander, whom
fate has retained in his northern home. Another, a
coachman, long since gone into other employment, has
narrated how when it was his duty to drive Sir John
350 THE ENGINEER AT HOME
to the distant Garve Station, starting at three or four
o'clock on a late autumn morning, his master would
personally see that the servant as well as himself had
a good breakfast before starting, and all in a manner
so kindly and thoughtful that the remembrance of it
was cherished after long years. In many of his
letters to Lady Fowler he expresses his gratitude for
the attention and care (not, so far as we can gather,
of any extraordinary nature) of the servant who
happened to accompany him. So, too, with his own
associates he seemed to look on what many regard
as the mere ordinary courtesies of life as real kind-
nesses to himself. This somewhat eager recognition
of personal attention was a genuine source of content-
ment, a trait of character calculated to make a man
very popular, even though at times it may have
made him tolerant of flattery. Full of goodwill
himself, he looked for and appreciated the goodwill
of others. Yet on occasion he could be exacting.
If a thing was wanted, neither trouble nor expense
was spared to get it at once, and of the best quality.
Still he was a man whom it was a pleasure to serve,
and with whom to exchange courtesies was a grateful
office.
Apart from the sports and duties of his Highland
home, Sir John's recreations and interests are evidence
of a liberal taste. They were active and social rather
than sedentary. He collected, much aided therein
by Lady Fowler, a valuable collection of pictures.
After his death his famous Hobbema fetched a
record price at Christie's. He had a number of
Turner's water-colours, and his appreciation of fine
work was real and discriminative.
HIS AMUSEMENTS 351
He was not a great reader, though being a bad
sleeper he often had some volume of light literature
by his bedside at night. He kept himself informed
of the advance of the sciences connected with his
profession, partly by reading, but more often by con-
ference and talk in the daily round of his work.
In connection with his Highland home, where he
naturally had more leisure, he read with great interest
topographical and antiquarian works. Thus, one of
our informants remembers to have found him busy
with Sir Thomas Dick Lander's Account of the Great
Floods of August, 1829, in the Province of Moray
and the Adjoining Districts (Edinburgh, 1830), a work
full of curious information for a Highland laird who
happened also to be an engineer. Burt's Letters
from the North were also in his hands at this time.
Captain Burt was an engineer officer who, about the
year 1730, was sent to the north of Scotland as a
contractor ; he gives in a series of letters a most
curious account of the poverty of the Highlanders
of that period, as well as of the arbitrary power of
their chieftains. Sir John also had by him for constant
reference a set of the Annual Register, a storehouse
of facts from which his love of detail and comparison
extracted a vast amount of pleasure and amusement.
This statement is sufficient to show that his recourse
to books was rather that of the lover of action and
outdoor life than of the student of literature.
We noticed on an earlier page his diffident dislike
of speaking in public, and in his earlier days no
amount of preparation seems to have made him quite
comfortable on a public platform, a somewhat strange
contradiction in one naturally so self-confident. In
354 THE ENGINEEE AT HOME
further extension of the field of labour and the foundation
of a Graeco-Eoman Branch of this flourishing society.
" I know that Sir John Fowler regarded his connection with
the Egypt Exploration Fund, and the prosperity to which it
attained under his direction, with legitimate pride. And
indeed he had full reason to be proud. I trust that it may not
be thought presumptuous in me, who saw so much of him in
connection with the administration of this society, and who
thus learned to admire his simple and manly character, to have
written this imperfect appreciation of the debt of gratitude
that all who take an interest in the art and archaeology of
ancient Egypt owe to Sir John Fowler."
It is not given to many to pass beyond the limit
of threescore years and ten, without feeling the heavy
and disabling hand of time. Sir John, although a
hard worker, was also careful of his health, and was
happily allowed to enjoy a green and vigorous old age.
The following letter of reminiscence which has been
kindly sent to the author by Sir Benjamin Baker is
a valuable contribution to the philosophy of wise
husbandry in the matter of health, as well as an
interesting addition to the biography of his friend and
partner : —
"You ask me," he writes, "if any of Sir John Fowler's
early professional friends are likely to be able to contribute
information respecting his career. Sir John outlived most of
his professional friends. Stephenson, Locke, Brunei, Eendel,
and other leaders all died before they reached the age of fifty-
seven. Sir John lived thirty-three years after occupying the
Presidential Chair of . the Institution of Civil Engineers, whilst
on the average other presidents have so far survived no more
than thirteen years after attaining the same distinction in the
profession. The early death of so many leading engineers was
accepted by their colleagues as a warning that the anxiety and
responsibility inseparable from a great engineer's work cannot
LETTEE FBOM SIE BENJAMIN BAKEE 355
be safely associated with continuous application to their duties
and no holidays. At an unusually young age, therefore, Sir
John made it an annual duty to take a long holiday in the
Highlands, where his thoughts were diverted into an entirely
different channel, and this practice finally led to the acquire-
ment of the forty square miles of hills, straths, rivers, and
lochs in Western Eoss, and the transformation of the whole
into the beautiful estate which is well known throughout the
North as Braemore. The same regard to his health led him to
place himself in the hands of doctors as regards diet and
other matters to an extent which amused his friends, knowing
as they did with what a robust constitution he had been
endowed. He might easily excite the sympathy of strangers
by being seen in Westminster with a woollen scarf over his
mouth as a respirator, but his friends would know that perhaps
a few days later he might be found minus respirator, lying
amidst sleet and rain on the bleak top of one of his own high
hills at Braemore, waiting patiently for hours for the hinds to
move on, or for a stag to rise, and returning in the dark after
a long day's stalk without any thought of hardship, provided
he brought a fine beast home with him, which he generally did.
" My first visit to the Institution of Civil Engineers was to
hear my late partner deliver his presidential address in 1865 ;
and his last visit was to perform the duty devolving upon him
as the oldest surviving Past-President of proposing a vote of
thanks to me for the presidential address delivered on my
taking the chair occupied by him thirty years before. The
growth of the engineering profession during the aforesaid
interval is well illustrated by the increase in the number of
members of the Institution from 1203, on the occasion of the
first address, to 6,907 on that of the second.
" I first met Sir John Fowler forty years ago, as a youngster
about to proceed to India for a career. The impression I then
formed of him is as clear to-day as ever, and has never varied.
I felt myself in the presence of a born commander of men,
who formed his opinion with instinctive quickness, held on to
it firmly, never questioning its soundness himself, nor failing
356 THE ENGINEEE AT HOME
sooner or later to satisfy most of his hearers by ingenuity of
argument and charm of manner, that if they held a contrary
opinion originally it was a fortunate thing for them that they
had come to see him before it was too late. He advised me
not to go to India. I thought he was wrong, but obeyed. I
have long since known that he was right.
" In many far more important matters his great experience
and rapid and comprehensive grasp of all of the circumstances
have, to my knowledge, led him to give advice, the rejection
of which has afterwards been seriously regretted. Thus the
Great Western Eailway directors long remained undecided
on the question of bridge versus tunnel across the Severn.
Sir John strongly advocated a bridge, and we prepared designs
and estimates, which were thought too bold and risky at the
time, but which our subsequent experience at the far more
difficult work across the Forth more than justified. He told
the directors that a tunnel would take twice as long to con-
struct, would cost far more than the estimate, on account of
trouble with influx of water, and for the same reason would
cost more to maintain, as the tunnel would require to be
continuously pumped, whilst the bridge would want nothing
but a coat of paint. Most important of all, however, the
bridge would carry safely far more traffic than a tunnel by
reason of the better gradients and facilities for intermediate
block stations. All this has proved to be true, and there is
little doubt that the present directors regret that their pre-
decessors rejected the advice of their consulting engineer, and
handed over to them a tunnel instead of a bridge. Similarly,
to my knowledge, the Great Western Eailway would have
been at Southampton Docks, and the Great Northern Eailway
would years ago have effected amalgamations which would
have obviated the difficulties arising from the costly extension
of the Manchester, Sheffield and Lincolnshire, or Great Central
Eailway to London, had they followed Sir John's advice. It
is hardly necessary to say that qualities such as Sir John
Fowler possessed would have ensured success in any profession
or business, and it is a question whether his country would
LETTER FROM SIR BENJAMIN BAKER 357
not have benefited more by his services as a great organiser
and leader of men in warlike operations than in the peaceful
pursuit of railway making. Leaders of men necessarily invite
criticism; their personal characteristics often present many
different phases, and the opinions of casual critics may reason-
ably vary according to the particular phase of which they
have had experience. At one time of his life Sir John was
much troubled with distressing headaches, and being at the
same time hard pressed with work, I can readily understand
that anyone, knowing him only when the headache was in
force, would form the wrong opinion that he was irritable
and unreasonable in manner and judgment. All who knew
him well, including his engineering staff, knew that these
stormy intervals were but as a few claps of thunder in a
summer's season, and that his normal attitude was one of
infectious cheerfulness, for which everyone having to do with
him felt the better. Occasionally, however, somebody would
resent a remark or action of his, and a slight initial difference
between two strong and proud men often widens into a serious
breach of former friendly relationships. Such breaches, of
course, did occur in Sir John's long career, as they have in
that of all other prominent men's, and they have sometimes
led temporarily to wrong inferences, which have long since
proved themselves to be unfounded.
"For many years past no secrets, personal or otherwise,
existed between my partner and myself, as we consulted each
other on even the most private personal matters. I claim,
therefore, to know his character 'down to bed-rock.' His
last letter to me, written that I might be ' the first to know '
that he was sick unto death, was subscribed ' Your affectionate
friend,' and I am proud to have held and to have returned
for more than thirty years the friendship and affection of such
a man."
For many years Sir John Fowler had suffered from
attacks of bronchitis, the result of chills caught on
some of the frequent journeys necessitated by his
358 THE ENGINEER AT HOME
profession. Gradually this caused weakness and dilata-
tion of the heart, and, during the last few years of his
life, an increasing difficulty in breathing.
Notwithstanding his growing infirmities, he continued
to take a close interest in much of the work which went
through the office at Queen Square Place. The last
matter of importance to which he gave personal super-
vision was the difficult and costly engineering task of
crossing the river Findhorn, on the new section of the
Highland Railway between Aviemore and Inverness.
It had been originally proposed to take a circuitous
route, and to build near Tomatin a bridge of very
moderate dimensions. Sir John, however, succeeded in
persuading the directors to adopt a more direct course,
and to save thereby a distance of between one and two
miles. The present lofty and magnificent viaduct is
the result. The stone used in the fine masonry of this
work came from the quarries which had supplied granite
for the Forth Bridge, and in excellence of this kind the
veteran engineer found an intense delight.
In July, 1896, when he had attained the ripe age
of seventy-nine, he became for the first time seriously
ill. In August, however, he was able to go to his
beloved Braemore, and, as usual, to entertain his
friends. He returned to London in October. There
he remained till, in January, 1897, by his doctor's
advice, he went to Egypt, accompanied by Lady
Fowler and a medical attendant. The air of the
desert and a quiet rest at the Mena Hotel, near the
Pyramids, revived him, and on his way home he was
able to enjoy a six weeks' visit to Hyeres, where he
found his old friend and partner, Mr. Baldry. After
reaching home he had a relapse in June, and, though
LAST DAYS 359
able to go to Braemore, it was evident to himself
and to those who loved and watched him that he
was growing weaker. It was at this time he wrote
the touching letter to which allusion is made in the
above - printed communication from Sir Benjamin
Baker. One of the last visitors at his Highland home,
Mr. Alfred Gathorne-Hardy, remembers well how
shocked he felt at the changed appearance of his
kind friend and host. Sir John, however, would not
hear of the visit being curtailed, and though obliged
to keep his room on many days he followed with
kindly interest the sport of his guests in the forest
and on the river.
In October, 1897, he returned to London, where
he became very ill. His medical adviser, Dr. Kidd,
for whose sedulous care he frequently expressed the
warmest gratitude, became afraid in February, 1898,
that the end had come. The family was summoned.
His strong spirit, however, once more bore up against
disease, and he rallied so far that he was able to go
to Brighton for a fortnight in May. His sister,
Mrs. Whitton, now a widow, at this time returned
from Australia. To her, and indeed to all the
members of his family, he had ever been warmly
attached, and the meeting was a source of much quiet
joy to the brother and sister. He continued fairly
well, though extremely feeble, during the summer.
In September he went to Bournemouth, where, until
the end of the month, he was able to go out daily
in an invalid chair. He grew, however, visibly
weaker, but at intervals he recovered his clear mind
and fortitude, and talked with calm resignation of that
which was to come.
360 THE ENGINEER AT HOME
On November 20th, 1898, he was feeling unusually
bright, and joined his wife and his brother, Mr.
Frederick Fowler, at dinner. He asked his brother
to tell other members of the family that he was in
full possession of his faculties, and presently he retired
to his room, which adjoined the dining-room. Here,
seated on a sofa, while his favourite servant, Frederick
Theyer, was helping him to undress, he suddenly and
very peacefully passed away. His work was done,
and, full of years and of honour, he was vouchsafed
the crowning mercy of a painless death.
The work of men who have excelled in the arts of
peace does not touch the imagination as do records of
conquest and stirring adventure, but it has a perma-
nence and importance which is not to be gainsaid.
The life-work performed by Fowler and his compeers,
by the relatively prosaic methods here described, has
been revolutionary in its consequences. The England
through which Fowler travelled to London in the
"Emerald" coach in the year 1838 is not the England
which he left in 1898. Yet, so numerous have been
the leaders of the army marching forward in step,
so general, so simple, and so obvious has been each
advance, that we find it difficult to perceive and to
insist on the personal element in this vast change.
The effacement of the record of great industrial
captains will, on reflection, enhance rather than detract
from their title to the gratitude of mankind. It is
true that, in the life of Stephenson, as depicted by
Dr. Smiles, the figure of the hero emerges out of the
chaos in which lurked his great opportunity, homely,
resolute, and successful in its appeal to our historical
GKEATKESS OF THE AETS OF PEACE 361
imagination. He seems to pass, and to carry the world
with him, at one step out of the darkness of the middle
ages into the modern economy of an industrial state.
The biographer is well within his rights when he
dwells even to exaggeration on the width of that
stride. Yet even Stephenson, who has been identified
with the locomotive engine, had his precursors. His
fame, moreover, is great and lasting, not so much
because of his own work, but because of the vastly
superior work which his successors have been able to
engraft on his achievement. All these considerations
have a levelling effect. It would almost seem that
those who work with, rather than against, the stream
of progress, are, by the very success of their effort,
doomed to a certain supersession and oblivion. After
Stephenson, a typical figure to whom much is assigned
that happened both before and after his time, many
opportunities for improvement of transport have been
seized, but to none of them has the public vouch-
safed the same high acknowledgment of fame. After
Stephenson it was, for a time at any rate, to be the
day of the great organiser rather than of the great
inventor ; and it is as a great organiser that Fowler
becomes a pre-eminent figure in the industrial revolu-
tion of the century.
These levelling reflections detract in no way from the
merit of those who receive and utilise, who rekindle with
increased glow, and then hand on the torch of know-
ledge and enlightenment from generation to generation.
On the contrary, they enable us to discriminate, to
appreciate the value of services which have been
eclipsed by the very greatness of their results, and
to set them in contrast with those barren heroisms
362 THE ENGINEEK AT HOME
which leave their perpetrators in splendid isolation.
The great man, in Carlyle's view, is too often the man
of violent and unscrupulous character, who is borne
into a place and power on some backward eddy from
the otherwise even current of human progress, by an
appeal to the ignoble instincts of fear, superstition,
and force. The Mohammedan power, the crushing
burden of militarism under which Europe still groans,
are gifts which we owe to Mahomed, and to such as
Frederick and Napoleon — men whose abnormal oppor-
tunity and personality Carlyle has characterised as
heroic.
Happily greatness of this kind is as rare as it is
monstrous. It can have few imitators, but remains in
isolation, a solitary monument to dazzle the imagina-
tion of succeeding generations.
The greatness achieved in the arts of peace is in
every way a contrast to that of the Carlylean hero.
Under free institutions the coercive hero has no per-
manent usefulness. The able man, the great man, the
worker of beneficent revolution, is he who opposes
superstition, and vicious but inveterate custom, by
some new and convincing exposition of right reason ;
who, like Bentham, from his philosopher's study, a
figure not ordinarily regarded as heroic, exercises
a silent but irresistible influence on the laws and
administration of his country ; who, like Adam Smith,
gains the assent of his countrymen, or even of a larger
audience, to some just law of social development ; who,
like Newton or Stephenson, discovers some hitherto
neglected law of nature, and applies it for the en-
lightenment or service of men ; or, to come to the
subject of the present biography, who takes a yeoman's
GEEATNESS OF THE AETS OF PEACE 363
share in domesticating for the use of man the new
discoveries of science, the triumphs of hydraulic, steam,
and electrical engineering. These, and such as these,
are the great qualities of civilisation. They make no
appeal to the fratricidal impulses of force and fraud
which lie buried, not very deeply, in human nature, and
which seem to give to him who evokes them on a large
scale the isolation of greatness. They rely rather on the
equity of free contract, and on the self-discipline and
independence of labour which is thereby engendered.
They recognise that, in accordance with the great law
of the economy of effort, slavery, arbitrary power,
and the oppression of labour are things morally and
economically inconsistent with modern conditions.
Men possessed of, and called on to exercise, these
qualities are not isolated from or placed above our
industrial system. They are part and parcel of it.
They are the moving spirits in an economic har-
mony, wherein the ceaseless energy of human effort is
spontaneously guided into honourable and serviceable
channels.
We are far, alas ! from an ideal condition of in-
dustrial life, but who can doubt that progress must
be organised by the expansion and adaptation of this
principle !
It is in the light of these considerations that we
claim for men of scientific and industrial achievement
a meed of honour more real and more due than that
which is given to great conquerors. England's great-
ness among the nations — the greatness, that is, of
modern England — will never in the eye of history
consist in mere supereminence of material empire,
but in her pioneer advance, scatheless, through the
364 THE ENGINEER AT HOME
difficulties of that new industrial era on which she
was the first to enter. To their country's greatness
in this respect, Fowler and his compeers (for the
merits of these captains in industry has been happily
contagious) have, by their energy, their integrity,
and their independence, made notable contribution.
It has been the object of this volume to depict the
career of a strong man, whose pride and good fortune
it was to labour, in all honour, with and not against
the tendency of the time, and in this light the reader
is asked to accept the foregoing tribute to the memory
of John Fowler.
APPENDIX
ADDRESS OF JOHN FOWLER, ESQ.
President of the Institution of Civil Engineers,
ON TAKING THE CHAIR, FOR THE FIRST TIME AFTER HIS ELECTION,
JANVARY 9, 1866.
GENTLEMEN, — On assuming the chair of this Institution as its
President, and undertaking for the first time its duties and responsi-
bilities, allow me to assure you that I feel deeply the honour you have
conferred upon me by electing me to this, the highest position to
which the Civil Engineer can aspire ; and that I feel still more
deeply the weight of the duties which are inseparable from this
honour. I will also venture earnestly to request you to extend to
me your indulgence during my period of office, and afford me your
kind co-operation in any efforts I may make for the advancement of
our profession, or for increasing the usefulness of this Institution.
I ask this assistance from you with peculiar anxiety, because I
cannot but feel that the present is a period of unusual importance to
this Society, and that the rapidly increasing prominence of the pro-
fession demands at our hands a corresponding care for its efficiency
and dignity.
The high degree of material prosperity which this country and its
dependencies have now happily enjoyed for a considerable time, has
naturally led to great activity in our profession; probably at no
former period have the skill and enterprise of engineers been so
severely taxed as during the last few years ; and as civilisation con-
tinues to advance, and labour to require increased assistance from
mechanical contrivances, the connection of civil engineering with
social progress will become more and more intimate.
I hope I may be allowed to say, however, with a deep feeling of
professional pride, that hitherto the inventive genius, the patient
perseverance, and indomitable energy of the members of our pro-
365
366
APPENDIX
fession have not been found unequal to the tasks they have been
called upon to perform ; and although I have full confidence in the
future, I venture to suggest that the present is a fitting moment for
considering the means by which our younger brethren may be best
prepared for the arduous duties, and growing difficulties, which they
will undoubtedly have to encounter in their professional career.
It is not merely that works of magnitude and novelty are in-
creasing, and will continue to increase, but it is becoming apparent
Competition tnat we s^a^ ^ave to meet ^e comPetition of foreign
by foreign engineers in many parts of the world ; and that great
efforts are now being made, not only by careful scholastic
education, but by more attention to practice on works, to render
the civil engineers of France, Germany, and America, formidable
rivals to the engineers of this country.
Here it has always been found that friendly and honourable
rivalry among members of the profession has been on the whole
beneficial to science and to engineering progress, and we cannot
doubt that the same result will follow the more extended rivalry
which we shall have now to meet from the engineers of every
nation. At the same time this consideration renders it our especial
duty to take care that the distinguished and leading position which
has been so well maintained by our great predecessors, shall not be
lowered by those who come after them.
My predecessors in this chair have addressed you chiefly upon the
interesting topics and works of their own time, and with so large
Former a field, demanding their attention, it was natural that
addresses. they should devote themselves mainly to describe the
past, and to indicate in outline the features of greatest interest in
the present.
My immediate predecessor, Mr. McClean, gave to the Institution
a description of the remarkable results which had been produced by
the general introduction of railways into England in combination
with steam power, and clearly pointed out their influence on the
increase of its material prosperity and national wealth.
Mr. Hawkshaw pointed out the rapidly increasing importance of
wrought-iron for engineering works, with the promise of new appli-
cations of steel; and the fact and consequences of the increasing
speed of railways and steam boats.
Mr. Bidder, after denning the object and scope of the profession
of the civil engineer to be " to take up the results discovered by the
abstract mathematician, the chemist, and the geologist, and to apply
PRESIDENTIAL ADDEESS 367
them practically for the commercial advantage of the world at large,"
illustrated his views by selecting the examples of hydrodynamical
science and hydraulic engineering, for the purpose of pointing out
the serious mistakes which might result from the neglect of a proper
knowledge of true mathematical principles.
Mr. Robert Stephenson described the modern railway system in
England up to the period of his address, commenting upon its extent,
and justly appreciating its value ; and he reviewed, in a large and
philosophical spirit, its system of management, and the commercial
economy which it had produced.
Mr. Locke in like manner selected for his subject a description of
the French railway system and its management, in the introduction
of which he had himself been so actively engaged.
Another of my predecessors, Sir John Rennie, seems to have been
determined that no single topic of professional interest should remain
to any future President which he had not himself exhaustively dis-
cussed; for he not only presented a complete panorama of all past
engineering works, but he gave a descriptive analysis, so full and
complete as to make his address at once a history of engineers, and a
manual of engineering science.
The whole field of discussion and description of the past has thus
been so completely and so ably occupied by my predecessors in this
chair, that I shall not attempt to travel over the same THEFuTUEE
ground ; but I propose to deal almost exclusively with OF THE
the future, and endeavour, although I possess no peculiar I
personal fitness for the task, to suggest some of the means by which
the younger members and the rising generation may best prepare
themselves for the duties which that future will bring with it.
I may first briefly notice, and for the purpose of illustration and
introduction, a few of the great engineering problems of remarkable
boldness and novelty which are now presenting them-
selves for the supply of the future wants and convenience ENGINEERING
of mankind : amongst them may be enumerated the Suez PROBLEMS OF
Canal; the tunnel through, and the railway over, Mont y**/™
Cenis ; railway bridges over and under great rivers and
estuaries; new ferry works of unusual magnitude; vast warehouses and
river approaches for commercial cities like Liverpool ; railways under,
over, and through great cities ; long lines of land and ocean telegraphs ;
and comprehensive schemes of water supply, drainage, and sewerage.
368 APPENDIX
All these works present problems of great interest; and it will
require cultivated intelligence, patient investigation, and enlarged
experience, to accomplish the task of their satisfactory solution.
For the Suez Canal we must be content to wait a few years before
the work be so far advanced as to enable us to judge of the effects of
the physical and moral obstacles which to some experienced minds
have appeared all but insuperable.
The Mont Cenis Tunnel, and the temporary railway being con-
structed over its summit, will continue to be watched with interest
by all engineers, and it may yet be a question how far the mode
of traction which has been adopted for the temporary railway will
prove to be the best. The modified locomotive with the aid of a
central rail has no doubt succeeded in surmounting gradients which
have hitherto been considered to be more severe than compatible
with the economical use of the locomotive engine ; but further
experience is still required, and the results of the trial will be
watched with great interest, because it cannot be doubted that con-
ditions will continue to present themselves to which the ordinary
locomotive engine cannot conveniently be applied.
In many of the proposed and future designs of bridges over or
under great rivers and estuaries, no novelty in the principles of con-
struction may probably be required, but in other cases the mere
magnitude alone will demand new arrangements and combinations;
and may possibly also suggest the use of steel for parts or the whole
of the structure.
The docks and warehouses of our great commercial cities are
rapidly advancing in importance, and are constantly demanding
increased facilities to enable them to meet the exigencies of trade;
and for this purpose every possible resource of steam machinery, and
hydraulic and pneumatic mechanism, will have to be taxed, to obtain
convenient and adequate power and expedition.
The new scheme of river approaches at Liverpool is one of the
most remarkable proposals of modern times for its boldness in
grappling with the difficulties and necessities of a pressing want, and
the complete solution of a difficult problem. It is understood that
the engineer of the Mersey Board, who has designed this great work,
is preparing a model on a large scale, which I have no doubt will be
brought before the Institution.
The railways under, over, and through great cities are amongst the
most striking results engendered by the necessities of rapidly in-
creasing and closely crowded population, and may be regarded as one
PEESIDENTIAL ADDEESS 369
of the most useful economical developments which engineering has
supplied to satisfy the requirements of modern civilisation. The
engineering problems they present are infinite in their number, and
interestingly intricate in their character.
Ocean telegraphy is yet in its infancy, but enough has been done
by the numerous lines already laid, and by demonstration before this
Institution, to prove that further experience alone is wanting to enable
deep or shallow sea cables to be successfully laid and maintained
wherever they may be required ; and probably in no branch of our
profession is the future of greater interest than in the coming tele-
graphic connection of every part of the world by sea and land, and
in the political, commercial, and social results which must follow such
a remarkable increase in the facility of general intercommunication.
The rapid growth of communities, to which I have already alluded,
has also developed the necessity of provision being made for a more
abundant supply of pure water, and for a more complete system
of sewerage than is now generally possessed by our towns and cities.
Some of these works are already being carried out, or seriously
contemplated, on a scale of almost startling, but not unnecessary,
magnitude.
It is plain, therefore, that in every department of civil engineering
the wants of commerce and society are pressing more and more
urgently upon the resources of our profession. We have ship canals,
but the Suez Canal throws them all in the shade. We have long
tunnels through our English mountains, but we have now to penetrate
the Alps. We have large bridges, but larger are required. We
have noble ports, but they are choked with trade, and new accommo-
dation of an improved kind is called for. We have steam ferries
across rivers, estuaries, and straits, and rapid ocean steamers, but
higher speed and better accommodation are demanded. We have
large warehouses with convenient mechanical appliances, but larger
warehouses and better mechanical appliances have become a necessity.
We have many thousands of miles of telegraphic communication, but
nothing short of its universal extension will suffice.
In the solution of these problems, thus rapidly indicated, and
in others which could be easily adduced, we may rest perfectly
satisfied that the difficulties they present are not to be overcome
by a stroke of genius or by a sudden happy thought, but they must
be worked out patiently by the combination of true engineering
principles, ripe experience, and sound judgment.
Having thus called your attention to the peculiar position of our
2 B
370 APPENDIX
profession in consequence of its rapid growth, and pointed out some
DEFINITION of tlie Prol)lems which await an early solution, I shall
or A CIVIL now attempt to describe the nature of the functions
ENGINEER. Qf ^e modern CIVIL ENGINEER; and consider how the
coming generation can be best prepared for its inevitable work, and
to what extent this Institution can be made ancillary to that purpose.
Although we know from history that men have existed from the
earliest times who have been distinguished by great mechanical
capacity, remarkable skill in working materials, profound science,
and constructive knowledge, yet it is only during the present century
that civil engineering can be considered to have become a distinct
and recognised profession. Now, however, it has assumed the
position of an art of the highest order. Perhaps we may without
arrogance be entitled to claim for it the title of a true science.
Many attempts have been made to define and describe a civil
engineer in a few general words, but all such attempts have been
more or less unsatisfactory. Still, though it is difficult, if not im-
possible, to describe an engineer by a short definition, it is not so
difficult to enumerate and describe the nature of the works he is
required to design and execute, and the professional duties he is
called upon to perform.
He has to design and prepare drawings, specifications, and
CLASSIFICA- estimates, and to superintend the carrying out of works
TION OF THE which may be thus enumerated : —
TRUSTED*™ !• Railways, roads, canals, rivers, and all modes of
A CIVIL inland communication.
2. Water supply, gas-works, sewerage, and all other
works relating to the health and convenience of towns and cities.
3. The reclamation, drainage, and irrigation of large tracts of
country.
4. Harbours of refuge and of commerce, docks, piers, and other
branches of hydraulic engineering.
5. Works connected with large mines, quarries, ironworks, and
other branches of mineral engineering.
6. Works on a large scale connected with steam-engines, with
machinery, shipbuilding, and mechanical engineering.
This list, which might be almost indefinitely extended, involves
a vast variety of work, and must appear almost appalling to a young
engineer. Yet it greatly concerns his future success that he should
as far as possible be prepared to undertake any or all of the works
embraced in the list.
PEESIDENTIAL ADDEESS 371
I believe the personal history of most of us would show that
circumstances have led us in a widely different direction, in the
exercise of our profession, from that which we originally contem-
plated, and that the success of many men may be distinctly traced
to their ability to avail themselves of unforeseen opportunities to
advance in some neAV direction.
The civil engineer must therefore be prepared for the various
classes of constructive works thus enumerated; but in addition to
this professional preparation, it is of the first importance, study of
as affecting his true position, and the confidence which objects, and
ought to be reposed in him, that he should also have
a correct appreciation of the objects of each work contemplated, as
well as their true value, so that sound advice may be given .as to the
best means of attaining them; and he must be prepared, if neces-
sary, to advise his employers that the objects which are sought are
not commercially worth the cost of the means which would secure
them. It is not the business of an engineer to build a fine bridge
or to construct a magnificent engineering work for the purpose of
displaying his professional attainments, but, whatever the temptation
may be, his duty is to accomplish ,the end and aim of his employers
by such works and such means as are, on the whole, the best and
most economically adapted for the purpose.
The first question which will present itself to an engineer with
respect to any proposed work, will be the selection of his material ;
and as this question is so vital to the accomplishment of choice of
a satisfactory result, I propose to treat it in a preliminary materials.
and special manner. I wish to impress upon every young engineer
a due sense of its importance, because probably a greater number
of mistakes have been made by the use of a wrong material, than
from any other cause.
In the case of stone work, it is essential that the mode of con-
struction shall have reference to the character of the stone ; and this
requires much of the knowledge of the geologist, the
stonemason, and the quarryman, so that the engineer
may know how best to work and set the stone, and what are the
peculiarities of the quarry as to its sound or unsound beds ; and, in
addition, he should have sufficient chemical knowledge to detect any
unfitness in the conditions of use to which he proposes to subject the
stone.
Let us always bear in mind, in connection with this subject, the
example of Sir Christopher Wren, engineer as well as architect, who
372 APPENDIX
himself selected the quarries, and sometimes even the blocks of
which his structures were composed.
Of bricks I must be content with saying, that the power of de-
tecting the good from the bad, the suitable from the
unsuitable, must be acquired by the combined assistance
of reading, experiment, and practice.
A knowledge of lime, and the art of making the best practicable
mortar from each description of building lime, is almost of equal
Mortar and importance to that required for selecting the stone, brick,
cement. an(j building materials themselves, but it is somewhat
remarkable that the art of preparing mortar in a proper manner is
not so general as it deserves to be ; and to secure good mortar is a
matter of continual anxiety to the engineer.
Mortar for engineering works is ordinarily made from cement
(chiefly Portland cement); or from hydraulic lime, such as lias; or
from ordinary lime, such as grey or chalk lime.
Cement is chiefly used in combination with sand in various pro-
portions, according to the nature of the work to be executed, and
it is not only necessary to possess the requisite knowledge and
experience for determining the proper proportions of cement and
sand for each individual case, but it is desirable to have the means
of determining by direct and repeated experiment the strength and
quality of the cement which it is intended to use.
In the case of hydraulic lime, such as lias, the same general
knowledge of the proper proportion of sand to be used is also
requisite, but, from the great variation in the character of lias lime,
and the .different proportions of silica and alumina in combination
with the lime itself, it is essential to obtain a careful chemical
analysis, in order to avoid the great disappointment and bad
consequences which may result from ignorance of the various
qualities.
Of ordinary limes, it is only necessary here to say that they are
of almost infinite variety as to quality and constituent parts, and
must each be dealt with accordingly; and the engineer can scarcely
take too much trouble to inform himself of the exact nature of
each lime he has to use, and the best mode of using it.
Modern science, and the convenient manner in which steam-power
can now be applied, have given to the modern engineer the means
of obtaining better mortar from the same materials than was possible
before the general introduction of steam.
The heavy rollers and iron pan worked by steam-power are now
PKESIDENTIAL ADDKESS 373
almost universally used for grinding and mixing lime and sand
for works of magnitude : they produce with properly proportioned
ingredients a mortar so good in quality, and so equal in the time and
power of setting, that the engineer can calculate with certainty upon
the conditions under which his designs will be carried out; and
when he has become thoroughly acquainted with the quality and
power of good mortar, and acquired confidence in its use, he will
feel himself justified in its adoption in cases where our predecessors,
and even some modern engineers, would have hardly ventured to
employ it in the place of the more costly Portland cement.
When iron is intended to be used in structures, it is essential to know
under what circumstances cast-iron is best for the purpose, or when
wr ought-iron should be employed, '"and also when steel must
be resorted to. The profession has probably been assisted
to a greater extent by the experiments and writings of its members
and of distinguished men of science in the material of iron than
on any other subject; but these valuable investigations and ex-
periments must be supplemented by the practical knowledge which
can only be acquired by attentively studying the peculiarities of
material and manufacture.
Cast-iron or pig-iron remelted and run into moulds is largely used
by engineers for columns and other parts requiring great power
of resisting compressive strains ; and, as its price per ton is generally
about one half of that of wrought-iron, it becomes a matter of
economic importance to adopt it in all cases where it can be safely
and properly used, but it is of the most varied quality and strength,
and the greatest attention of the engineer is required to secure the
proper kind.
Wrought-iron is perhaps less varied in its quality than cast-iron,
and for many purposes of engineering it is the safer metal to adopt,
from its greater power of resisting tensile strains, and less liability
to sudden fractures. But it must be remembered that wrought-iron
is sometimes pure and of high quality, sometimes very impure and
of the commonest quality, and even with the same degree of purity
it may be soft and fibrous, or hard and crystalline; therefore it
is obvious that the young engineer should acquire a sound knowledge
of its nature both chemically and practically, so as to enable him to
obtain the quality he desires, and to know when he has secured it.
It would be easy to enlarge upon this interesting question of
wrought-iron, but it may suffice to instance armour-plates, and rails,
as cases where the best quality is required, but the quality, though
374 APPENDIX
best, must be different in kind; for armour-plates the iron can
scarcely be too soft and fibrous, whilst for rails it can scarcely
be too hard and crystalline, provided it is not so brittle as to be
liable to fracture by use. Again, in some iron, such as the 'best
Yorkshire,' the quality appears to improve with every additional
operation in the manufacture, whilst the ordinary Welsh iron is
almost destroyed by repeated manipulation. All these and many other
matters connected with iron should therefore be known thoroughly
and practically to the engineer.
In order to illustrate the necessity of the systematic study of
the peculiarities of the metals called iron and steel, let me refer to
the experiments of Mr. Eaton Hodgkinson, which first demonstrated
that the average resistance of cast-iron to crushing was more than
six times its tenacity, whilst the resistance of wrought-iron to
crushing was only four-fifths of its tenacity, and it will be remembered
that the mathematical investigations he founded upon these ex-
periments first established on a satisfactory and reliable basis the
degree and ratio of tensile and crushing force in cast and wrought-
iron.
With respect to steel, it must be admitted, that before we can
safely adopt it to any considerable extent for purposes of
construction, it will be necessary to have a similar series
of experiments and investigations specially made, but so promising
a metal will amply repay all the trouble that may be bestowed
upon it.
Of timber a thorough knowledge should be acquired, as no material
is otherwise more likely to deceive and to disappoint the engineer.
Not only is great difference found in trees of the same
Timber. J
general description, such as the numerous varieties of
the pine, but the same kind of pine is a different quality of wood
in different countries, and even in different soils and climate in the
same country ; and again the same tree is entirely changed by being
' bled ' or having its sap Avithdrawn. The oaks of America, England,
and the Continent are entirely different in their character, and oaks
also differ in quality from each other in the same country, and so
with numerous other woods used by the engineer. The strength,
durability, and peculiarity of different kinds of timber, and the
true value of artificially preserving them, should also be known
and understood.
I have selected these examples for the purpose of illustrating this
important fact, that before an engineer can even commence the de-
PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS 375
signs of his works he must have previously obtained a large amount
of preliminary information regarding the nature of all the materials
employed upon engineering works, so as to enable him to select for
his intended structures those materials which will be on the whole
the most suitable; having reference to efficiency, durability, and
economy.
I will now proceed to the question of the kind and degree of
knowledge which is required to enable a young engineer to proceed
to the actual design of a public work of importance.
0 ... ., , . , , . KNOWLEDGE
such as a railway with its stone, brick, and iron struc- REQUIRED
tures, its earthworks, and its all-important permanent BY A CIVIL
way; a railway station, a station roof; docks and their
appliances ; waterworks, breakwaters, or a Great Eastern steamship.
Although it has become the practice in modern times for many
civil engineers to be employed chiefly, or almost entirely, in some one
branch of the profession, I desire to repeat my conviction that it is
most important that the early preparation and subsequent study
should be as extensive as possible, and should embrace every branch
of professional practice, not only for the purpose of securing to a
young engineer more numerous opportunities for his advancement,
but also because sound knowledge and experience in all branches
of engineering will greatly add to his efficiency and value in any
special branch, in the same manner that a medical man will be more
reliable in his practice on the eye and the ear if he possesses a sound
practical and theoretical knowledge of every part of the human
frame.
All classes of the profession, but especially the railway, the dock
and harbour, and the waterworks engineer, must possess a knowledge
of parliamentary proceedings, so as to be able to avoid all non-com-
pliances with the Standing Orders of Parliament. To do this, it
is true, is no easy matter, as the clauses are often drawn up with so
little care and practical knowledge that neither engineers nor soli-
citors, nor the most experienced parliamentary agents, can understand
what is intended.
On the subject of parliamentary proceedings generally, it may be
taken for granted that all Committees desire to do justice to the cases
which are brought before them, and that if they sometimes fail in
their decisions, either as regards the interests of the public, or in
arranging a fair settlement between antagonistic interests, it is not
unfrequently due to the imperfect and crude manner in which cases
are presented to them. I would therefore impress on all young
376 APPENDIX
engineers the importance, both to themselves and to their clients, of
laying their cases before Committees in the most perfect manner
possible, accompanied by full and correct information, carefully pre-
pared and clearly worked out.
The professional knowledge required by the railway engineer com-
mences with surveying of all kinds, the use of the theodolite, the
Railway aneroid barometer, the level, the sextant, etc., and in-
engineering, eludes the surveys for preliminary and parliamentary
purposes; and also working surveys of minute accuracy, on a large
scale, from which engineering works may be set out with precision
upon the ground.
The railway engineer must understand thoroughly the nature of
earthworks of every kind, and the proper angles or slopes to be
adopted for cuttings and embankments.
He must have the qualifications requisite to enable him to design
bridges, viaducts, tunnels, and all other incidental works and build-
ings, in the best and most economical manner.
He must have a knowledge of the training of rivers, and of the
effect of floods and drainage, in order that he may make accurate
provision for the due discharge of water without wasting money on
works unnecessarily large, or to avoid the risk of damage arising
from making them insufficient.
He must be familiar with the various characters of permanent way,
the best description of rail, sleeper, fastenings, and ballast, and with
the different descriptions of switches, crossings, turntables, signals
and telegraphs.
It is somewhat remarkable that, with all our experience, there
should still remain a doubt amongst engineers as to the best kind
of permanent way to be adopted even under similar circumstances.
For although continental engineers have almost without exception
adopted the flat-bottomed or ' Yignoles ' form of rail, the I form of
rail with equal top and bottom webs, and cast-iron chairs and
wooden keys, is still largely used in this country.
A collection of facts with respect to the different descriptions of
permanent way in use in this and other countries, with a view to
a comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of each, would
form a most interesting and important paper for the Institution,
especially if it embraced all the recent experiments with reference
to the use of steel rails.
The railway engineer should not be destitute of some knowledge
of architecture and such a taste for those graceful outlines and simple
PKESIDENTIAL ADDEESS 377
appropriate details which should always characterise the works of an
engineer, as to be able to avoid, on the one hand, the unnatural
ornamentation which seems to have no connection with the structure,
and, on the other hand, a disregard of either form, outline, or pro-
portion.
But all such knowledge may fail if there be not a constant super-
vision and control over the quality of all the materials and workman-
ship employed upon the railway. And it is not too much to say that
without the practical knowledge which is obtainable only by the
actual performance of the duties of resident engineer, it is hopeless
to expect that any engineer can be competent to undertake the re-
sponsibility of important works, or be fit to have large sums of money
entrusted to him for expenditure. It is in the capacity of resident
engineer that all previous preparation, both scholastic and profes-
sional, and all theoretical acquirements, become utilised and rendered
of practical value, and it is only after much experience on different
works of varied character, dimensions, and materials, and the acqui-
sition of the power of discriminating between good and bad materials
and workmanship, that a young student of engineering can claim to
take rank as a ' Civil Engineer.'
The dock and harbour engineer requires the general and much
of the special knowledge of the railway engineer, such as that which
belongs to railways and tramways, and warehouses for Dock and
goods; and to this he must add a vast amount of other harbour
special knowledge not required by the railway engineer. engineering.
For example, he must understand the laws which govern the ebb
and flow of the tides, the rise and fall and time of high and low
water; and he must have a knowledge of marine surveying, or the
best means of ascertaining the set and speed of currents, and their
tendency to increase depth of water by scour, or to diminish it by
silting; he must also know, in the case of docks, what kind and
extent of entrance accommodation to provide, whether the general
plan should comprise only a simple lock, or be combined with a half-
tide basin ; whether single or double gates should be used ; and
whether it would be necessary to have a tidal basin or a recessed
space, or both.
The nature of the trade to be accommodated in the proposed docks
must also be carefully ascertained, in order to provide a proper pro-
portion of quay space and water space, and proper width of quays,
warehouses for bonding or for goods to be deposited, sheds for
temporary protection, entrance for barges into warehouses from the
378 APPENDIX
docks, graving docks and workshops, with mechanical appliances for
gates, sluices and pumping, and for shipping or discharging minerals
or goods.
He may have to deal with solid foundation, and enjoy a facility
of procuring suitable materials for construction, as at Liverpool ; or
he may have the bad foundations of Hull and other places, where
alluvial silt of great depth has accumulated. It may be that good
sound stone is too costly for the mass of his work, and that he must
resort to brickwork, or rubble stonework, or concrete, or to a com-
bination of all three; but in determining such questions it is
impossible that anything but previous experience and habits of
careful investigation will enable an engineer to arrive at the best
decision. For it is not enough that his work should be solid,
permanent, and safe, but it should be rendered so at the smallest
possible cost.
The dock and harbour engineer is also required to report upon, and
to construct, harbours of refuge, piers, landing stages, lighthouses,
forts, canals and their appliances, river improvements, and many
other hydraulic works ; and in short, of this branch of engineering it
may be truly said that questions are continually arising which require
special study and mechanical invention to a greater extent than in
almost any other branch of the profession.
Harbours of refuge being large and costly works, are necessarily
few in number, and they are so slow in progress, and have generally
been so often changed from their original object and design, that few
engineering works have given less satisfaction either to the profession
or the public ; but we may hope, that if governments will accurately
appreciate the objects they desire to obtain, and boldly grapple with
the difficulties and cost of well-matured design, better and more
useful works of this nature may be accomplished than have yet been
undertaken.
The waterworks and drainage engineer must possess many of the
qualifications of the railway and dock engineer, and especially those
Waterworks which concern earthwork and masonry ; he must also be
and drainage familiar with the means of obtaining information on the
engineering. su^ject of rainfau in different localities, the methods of
correctly gauging streams of every kind ; the proportions of the
rainfall available for his purposes after estimating for evaporation
and waste, and the extent of the provision to be made for periods
of dry weather, or for compensation to mill-owners and other
interested parties.
PEESIDENTIAL ADDEESS 379
He must be conversant with the proper mode of executing the
works of reservoirs, conduits, weirs, tunnels, and aqueducts.
He must understand, by the aid of the chemist and his own
experience, the nature of the impurities in water, and the best mode
of diminishing them, whether mechanically, by subsidence and
filtration, or otherwise.
To the waterworks engineer we must look for the solution of one
of the great problems which the rapid increase of population is now
forcing upon us, viz. a comprehensive system of conservancy of the
flood waters of mountainous localities for the use of large cities and
towns, and densely populated districts. We are completely out-
growing our present arrangements for water supply in the great
majority of instances; and the convenience, comfort, and health
of the public demand that such works when required shall be no
longer postponed.
The initiative has been taken as to the question of a new source
of water supply for London, in a pamphlet by a well-known authority
in this branch of engineering, and sooner or later the subject must
command public attention.
The waterworks engineer must also be competent to design and
superintend works of sewerage, as well as of water supply, for large
and small towns and localities ; and his familiarity with waterworks
will naturally aid him in this, as the problems for the discharge and
pressure of fluids are identical in both cases.
The great sewerage works of London are now far advanced and
have already produced beneficial results ; the attention of other still
neglected cities and towns has recently been called to this important
subject by the loud and startling voice of a threatened return of
cholera, and it is to be 'hoped that the proper authorities will perform
their duty promptly and efficiently in this matter : but I cannot here
refrain from calling attention to a gigantic evil which has been
created by certain drainage and sewerage works already executed,
and where the convenience and comfort of one set of people have
been secured only by the infliction of a nuisance upon others. I
allude, to the discharge of collected sewage, without any attempt at
purification or deodorisation, into streams of pure water.
It is remarkable that an injustice so great, and an evil so in-
tolerable, should in any case have been permitted by Parliament,
or by the general law of the land; but now that public attention
has been fairly directed to the subject, let us hope that as soon as
possible a remedy will be applied to the cases where mischief has
380 APPENDIX
already been done, and that care will be taken to prevent its
recurrence.
It is no longer a matter of doubt that deodorisation or purification
is quite practicable in every locality, and therefore no sewage should
ever be permitted to be discharged into existing streams without this
purification, or it should be carried out to the sea, and there dis-
charged, as is now proposed for the north side of London.
The mechanical engineer deals with the most varied and numerous
subjects of all the branches of engineering. They require that he
should thoroughly understand the means of producing
engineering mechanical power, and of applying it to all the infinite
variety of purposes for which it is now demanded. To
this end he should be master of the laws of motion and rest, of
power and speed, of heat and cold, of liquids and gases.
He must be familiar with the strength of materials under every
variety of strain, the proper proportions of parts, and the friction
of surfaces.
He must apply existing tools and contrive new ones for his work,
and know how to direct power in the raising of weights, or for
driving all fixed machinery, or in producing locomotion on land
or water.
On railways he is responsible for the vast number of objects
required in the machinery for erecting and repairing shops for the
engines and carriages, for the pumping and other fixed engines,
and especially for the locomotive engine itself, and for rolling and
fixed plant generally.
In connection with docks he is required to design the machinery
for opening and closing the dock gates, working sluices, emptying
graving docks, or for working the cranes on the quays, or in the
sheds and warehouses.
The mechanical engineer generally also executes the designs of
the gas-engineer, even when he does not originate the work which
is entrusted to him ; and in this branch considerable chemical know-
ledge must be added to his mechanical qualifications.
For waterworks he designs and executes pumping engines, sluices,
valves, stopcocks.
In the case of mines he supplies designs of the engines for
pumping, drawing, winding, or ventilating; for locomotives above
and below ground, as well as for the various mechanical appliances
required in collieries, mines, and ironworks.
The adoption of the telegraph has been so astonishingly rapid
PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS 381
and extensive, both by sea and land, and the purposes to which it
has been applied so important, that a considerable body of able and
accomplished engineers have devoted themselves almost exclusively
to the subject for the last few years, and have already created a new
branch of the profession, called telegraphic engineering; but to
be an accomplished telegraph engineer it is necessary first to be a
good mechanical engineer and then to add the special knowledge
of the electrician, and therefore I include telegraphic under the head
of mechanical engineers.
I think it may fairly be traced to the distinguished ability of that
class of mechanical engineers who have devoted themselves to tele-
graphic engineering, that already so much has been done in telegraphy.
Certainly no discussions have been more ably sustained in this Insti-
tution than those upon this subject.
Allied with the mechanical engineer is the naval architect, and
only a mechanical engineer could have constructed the vast steam-
ships of modern days. The ordinary timber-ship builder of old
would have been literally ' at sea ' in the construction of modern
vessels, wherein the material is iron, and when the size of the vessel
requires scientific knowledge of form and resistance, of strains and
of strength, and when steam is the motive power. The demand
for large and swift vessels for ferries, for long voyages, for floating
batteries, and for iron-clad sea-going vessels, has of late been so
great that the construction of steam vessels has become a distinct
branch of engineering, under the name of naval architecture.
The mining engineer must possess much of the knowledge of the
railway and the mechanical engineer, and he must add to that
general knowledge much special knowledge of his own.
He must know how to sink shafts to the minerals if they
require to be extracted from beneath the surface (which
is usually the case), and how to divert or pump out the water he
meets with either in the shafts or the workings.
He must know how to excavate and bring to the surface minerals,
whether they be coal, copper, tin, lead, or iron, and to do this he
must construct subterranean railways, provide means of ventilation
by fans or furnaces, supply power to lift the extracted mineral to the
surface; and when brought there he must understand the further
requisite work, as the coal will probably require screening, or washing,
or manufacturing into coke, and the ore will require crushing, wash-
ing, or smelting, or possibly all three operations.
In all these cases, and many others, such as the collection of
382 APPENDIX
surface ironstone and other minerals, by railways and locomotive
engines, and the working of lifts and inclined planes, the mining
engineer has most important functions to perform, and has special
machinery to adapt or invent j and relying on his judgment and
skill alone, the investment of large sums of money for the
development of the mineral wealth of this country is annually
made.
I must not altogether omit a passing reference to the scientific
talent which of late years has been devoted to Artillery — its weapons
of attack and works of defence ; and I think we may
fairly claim that it is mainly due to some of the able
members of this Institution that this art has been placed
on a new and vastly improved basis, and that as a consequence a
new branch of the profession has been actually created — Artillery
Engineering.
Having now enumerated in some detail the various descriptions
of work which engineers are called upon to carry out,
REQUIRED BY I will next proceed to point out the kind of preparation
A CIVIL which, in my opinion, is requisite to enable them to
ENGINEER. ' J -, •
perform their work in a proper manner.
I am aware of the difficulty of the task, and of the wide difference
of opinion which exists on the subject, but I feel unable to resist
the opportunity of bringing this question under the consideration of
the Institution, because I feel convinced that at no period in the
history of the profession has it been so important as at the present
time. Those who may not be disposed to coincide in my views may
at least be led by the description of them to throw new light on
a subject which is of vital consequence.
We of the passing generation have had to acquire our professional
knowledge as we best could, often not until it was wanted for im-
mediate use, generally in haste and precariously, and merely to fulfil
the purpose of the hour, and therefore it is that we earnestly desire
for the rising generation those better opportunities and that more
systematic training for which in our time no provision had been
made, because it was not then so imperatively required.
The preparation and training for the civil engineer may be shortly
described as follows :
1. General instruction, or a liberal education.
2. Special education as a preparation for technical knowledge.
3. Technical knowledge.
4. Preparation for conducting practical works.
PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS 383
All this preparation and training will have to be acquired at some
time or other, and in some order or other, and it is known that
in the cases of some successful persons of great perseverance, they
have been acquired in a very remarkable order ; but at the present
time, and with all our modern opportunities, there is no reason why
they should not be learned in the most convenient and methodical
manner.
I will begin by supposing a boy of fourteen, in whom his parents
have discovered a mechanical bias, who has made good progress in his
general education, and especially in arithmetic, is of strong constitu-
tion, and possessed of considerable energy and perseverance : and
unless a boy possesses these tendencies and qualifications it is quite
useless to destine him for an engineer.
Taking the boy of fourteen, however, who possesses the requisite
qualifications, and with a determination on his own and his parents'
part that he shall be made an engineer, the period from fourteen
to eighteen should be devoted to the special education required by
an engineer, during which mathematics, natural philosophy, land
surveying and levelling, drawing, chemistry, mineralogy, geology,
strength of materials, mechanical motions, and the principles of
hydraulics should be thoroughly mastered.
To accomplish these studies, and, in addition, to make considerable
progress in the living languages, French and German especially, it will
be necessary to sacrifice to some small extent his classical studies and
pure mathematics, and it is, in fact, the partial omission of these
studies, and the prominence of those I have enumerated, which
constitutes a 'special education.'
If from fourteen to eighteen the boy has made all the progress in
these studies which can be reasonably expected from fair abilities
and more than average perseverance, the next step is of great im-
portance, and is one respecting which some difference of opinion will
exist.
At eighteen a boy if duly prepared may either be at once placed in
the office of a civil engineer for a period of four or five years'
pupilage, or he may be placed in a mechanical workshop, or he may
be sent to one of our great universities ; and any one of these
courses may be the best under particular circumstances, such as local
convenience, or as the social position of parents may dictate.
It cannot be doubted that a period of twelve to twenty-four
months may be very profitably spent in manufacturing works, before
passing into a civil engineer's office ; but in that case the greatest
384 APPENDIX
possible care must be taken that the works selected are adapted in
themselves to impart the desired information ; and that proper
organisation exists for carrying out strict office discipline, regularity
of attendance and due diligence; and that assistance be given
systematically to the pupil to enable him to obtain all the advantage
possible from his stay at the works.
It is of the greatest importance to the future success of the
engineer that during his professional preparation he should continue
his studies of mathematics and scientific works relating to his pro-
fession, and also of modern languages.
In the case of its being intended to send the boy to Cambridge or
Oxford, it is indispensable that all preliminary professional work,
such as practical knowledge of mechanics, mechanical drawing,
surveying and levelling, should be mastered before going to the
university, because it can scarcely be expected that he will submit
to the drudgery of learning them after his return from a three years'
university course, then at the age of say twenty-two. Probably the
best plan will be to take him away from his scholastic studies some-
what earlier than eighteen, if it be intended that he should go to the
university, and to take especial pains to make him accomplished in
the preliminary work of the draughtsman, the surveyor, and the
mechanic ; so that when he has taken his degree and enters as a
pupil in a civil engineer's office he will at once commence useful and
interesting employment, and will not require more than three years'
pupilage.
If arrangements can be so made, and assuming a boy has worked
well at school with his general studies, and subsequently with his
special studies ; and if from the age of seventeen or eighteen he does
justice to his opportunities in a good workshop, keeps up his know-
ledge of modern languages, proceeds to Cambridge or Oxford, taking
a good degree, and afterwards completes his studies as a pupil with a
civil engineer ; probably such a course would constitute the best possible
preparation and training which could be obtained : but at the same
time it cannot be doubted that it is a somewhat hazardous combina-
tion, and can only be successful with great determination on the part
of the pupil to keep his future career always in view, and to prepare
for it accordingly, as well before going to the university, and during
his college career, as after he leaves it.
With respect to the special preparation of young men between the
ages of fourteen and seventeen or eighteen, several of the largest and
best proprietary schools and colleges in this country have special
PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS 385
classes and departments for the study of the applied sciences; and
thence well-prepared pupils are annually sent out to commence their
career with engineers, architects, and surveyors ; but still the
character of this special preparation, in its theoretical branches, is
not considered quite equal to that of France or Germany for the
civil engineer.
It is true that nearly all continental nations have an advantage over
this country in the power which the nature of their government
gives them of concentrating, in one recognised official school for
the preparation of civil engineers, all the best available talent of their
country.
This plan does not exist in our country, and on the whole we
rejoice that it does not ; neither does the inducement of government
employment form the chief stimulus to our exertions, for which
we are also thankful : but at the same time no good reason can
exist why the opportunities of acquiring theoretical preparation in
this country should be inferior to those of the Continent; and I have
the confident hope, from the anxiety which is now manifested to
increase the ranks of our profession, and the desire to have the best
possible preparation for it, that even in the theoretical branches
we shall shortly have to acknowledge no inferiority to any other
nation. In the practical branches we are admittedly superior.
In drawing attention, however, to a comparison between our own
and other countries, let me be guarded against the possibility of being
understood to suggest that this theoretical equality ought to be
obtained by any sacrifice whatever of our undoubted great practical
knowledge. Indeed, on the contrary, I think that attention to the
greater opportunities which young engineers in this country enjoy,
by reason of the number -and character of our new public works,
than is attainable in other countries, should be constantly encouraged
to the utmost possible extent, and that our superiority as practical
engineers should be ever maintained.
We will now suppose that the general education and the special
instruction have been completed, the short probationary pupilage
in workshops has been gone through, languages and mathematics
kept up and improved, the university course in certain cases completed,
and the period has arrived for entering a civil engineer's office.
In selecting such office for a pupil it is important that it should be
well organised and not be too large ; that the engineer should be a
comparatively young and rising man, and be accustomed to take
pupils; but these should be few in number, and bear some pro-
2 C
386 APPENDIX
portion to the number and extent of the works in usual course
of construction under the engineer's direction.
It is not necessary to follow the pupil, when once the engineer's
office is entered, with any detailed advice, because he is no longer
a boy, unable to appreciate his position and duty. We assume that
he has been highly educated and carefully trained, and knows well
that his future success or failure will depend on the degree of dili-
gence with which he avails himself of the opportunities of acquiring
knowledge during his pupilage.
The work in the office and in the field should be done to the best
of his ability, and after the pupil has become a skilful draughtsman,
and is capable of taking out quantities of engineering works, and
preparing detailed estimates, methodically arranged, he will then
probably proceed to work out details of designs, and make calcula-
tions of strengths and strains, and thus become of real value in the
office, at the same time making substantial progress and rapid im-
provement for himself.
He should avail himself of every opportunity of mastering the
purpose and the principles of construction of the work brought
to his notice, both in the office and in execution; and he should
ascertain the cost price of all the materials and workmanship em-
ployed, separating the items into every minute detail.
The information which, amongst much beside, should be thus
obtained during pupilage, and which is necessary to constitute a
sound engineer, is —
1. A fair knowledge of the most fitting material to use for any
given work, under any given circumstances.
2. The power of designing any ordinary work with a maximum of
strength and a minimum of material and labour.
3. A knowledge of the means of ascertaining the cost price of
any ordinary engineering work.
The information or knowledge included in this brief enumeration
may be called practical knowledge, and it cannot be too often urged
upon young engineers that theory and practice must always go
together, hand in hand, step by step ; and that they are not only
not inconsistent or conflicting, but that they are necessarily united,
and must both be fully developed in the same person before he can
become a properly qualified 'Civil Engineer/
The period of pupilage should be from three to five years,
depending on the circumstances which have been previously
indicated, and, in addition to his attention to the office, and to
PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS 387
outdoor works, it will be well, while keeping up his preparatory
studies, especially in mathematics, that he should improve his
acquaintance with the French and German languages, and keep
up his knowledge of their engineering literature, and also avail
himself professionally and personally of the advantages offered by
this Institution.
In the case of the mechanical engineer, however, it will be seen
that although all scholastic and scientific training should be the
same as that previously described for all other branches, the period
of pupilage of the mechanical engineer must necessarily be passed
chiefly in large workshops or manufacturing establishments.
I propose now to consider in what manner this Institution can
be made available in the preparation of the young THE
engineer, and more useful to the profession generally; INSTITUTION.
and as a first step allow me, very briefly, to trace its history and
refer to its present prosperity.
It will be remembered that the Institution of Civil Engineers was
established on January 2nd, 1818, and that Telford was formally
installed President on March 21st, 1820.
The origin of the Institution was very humble.
About the year 1816 Mr. Henry Robinson Palmer, who was then
articled to Mr. Bryan Donkin, suggested to Mr. Joshua Field the
idea of forming a Society of young engineers for their mutual im-
provement in mechanical and engineering science. The earliest
members were Mr. Palmer, Mr. Field, and Mr. Nicholas Maudsley,
to whom were shortly added Mr. James Jones, Mr. Charles Collinge,
and Mr. James Ashwell.
When the Society was constituted, on January 2nd, 1818, these six
young men were joined "by two others, Mr. Thomas Maudsley and
Mr. John T. Lethbridge, with Mr. James Jones as Secretary, and
during the remainder of that year there was no increase in the
number of the members, and the only additions were three new
members in 1819.
In the following year, 1820, when Telford became President, there
were thirty-two elections.
At the end of 1822, when the Institution had been established for
five years, there had been fifty-four elections.
Telford's name gave a great impulse to the progress of the
Institution, which grew rapidly in importance under his fostering
hand, so that at the tenth year of its existence — at the close of
1827, there had been a total of 158 elections, and by June 3rd, 1828,
388 APPENDIX
when the charter of incorporation under the great seal was obtained,
the number amounted to 185 members.
Telford continued to be the President until his decease occurred,
which took place on September 2nd, 1834, and at that time the actual
number of members on the books (as distinct from the number
elected) was 200.
Mr. James Walker, the second President, was elected to that post
on January 20th, 1835 ; and after occupying the chair for ten years,
he declined to allow himself to be again put in nomination, in con-
sequence of a strong expression of opinion from several influential
members that a shorter period for the term of the office of President
had become necessary.
Accordingly on January 27th, 1845, Sir John Rennie was elected
President and served for three years.
Since then the chair has been successively filled by Joshua Field,
Sir William Cubitt, James Meadows Rendel, James Simpson, Robert
Stephenson, M.P., Joseph Locke, M.P., George Parker Bidder, John
Hawkshaw, and John Robinson McClean, each of whom has served
for two years, the maximum time now allowed by the by-laws.
It should be mentioned that in the ordinary course of rotation
Isambard Kingdom Brunei would have succeeded Robert Stephenson,
but Brunei requested that he might not then be put in nomination,
owing to ill-health and the pressure of professional duties, and
unhappily his early subsequent decease deprived the Society of any
future opportunity of electing him. It must always be a subject
of regret to the profession, that in the annals of the Institution
a member so gifted and accomplished should not appear on their
list of Presidents.
At the close of 1836, when the Institution had existed nineteen
years, the number of members of all classes who had been elected
was 369, and the number of those still remaining on the books was
252, or about five-sevenths of those elected.
At the close of 1860 these numbers were 1535 and 930 respectively,
from which it appears that three-fifths of all those elected still
belonged to the Institution, being a decline of only one-seventh in the
relative proportions after a further existence of twenty-five years.
The average annual effective increase of members and associates
during the ten years from 1840 to 1850 was 25, and from 1850
to 1860 it was 27, the actual increase in 1859 and 1860 being
37 in each year. In 1861 it was 20, and in 1862 the number
was 57.
PKESIDENTIAL ADDBESS 389
The numbers of members of all classes on the books on November
30th, 1865, were:—
Honorary Members . . 20
Members . . . .486
Associates . ... 689
Graduates . ... 8
Total . . . 1203
or an effective increase in one year of 108 members of all classes.
It will thus be seen that a steady annual increase has been the
characteristic of the Institution from its commencement, and it may
be noted in this, the forty-eighth year of its existence, that, when
it had been established twenty-four years, the number of members
was almost exactly one-half of the present number.
The experience of the last few sessions shows us clearly that we
may expect the future rate of increase to be at least equal to the
past, and the attendances on the Tuesday evening dis-
J Attendance.
cussions show that the interest attached to the proceed-
ings of the Institution increases in at least an equal proportion with
the augmentation of the numbers.
It is now not uncommon to find our meeting-hall inconveniently
crowded, and occasionally it is altogether inadequate to accommodate
the numbers who desire to be present ; and many persons who, from
the public interest attached to some of the subjects, desire to hear or
to take part in the discussions, are now prevented by our restricted
accommodation from doing so.
For some years in the early history of the Institution it was a
work of considerable difficulty to keep the disbursements within the
receipts, and except for the admirable management of our
late Secretary and now Honorary Secretary, Mr. Manby,
it is hard to know what difficulties we might not have experienced.
It was not until its income became sufficiently increased by the
liberal donations of the council and other members, by trust-moneys
and bequests, and by the increase in its numbers, that the Institution
was in a financial position to give increased accommodation and
assistance to its members.
It may be stated that during the last ten years the average increase
on the receipts has been forty per cent., whilst the increase in the
disbursements has been only twenty per cent. ; and that the present
amount of the realised property of the Institution may be safely
taken at £25,000.
390 APPENDIX
It will have been observed that considerable improvements have
been made in the library of the Institution, and in its arrangements
and facilities; and no doubt the Council and Secretary
will continue to give this important department their
earnest attention, and we may reasonably expect that both the
contents of the library and its accessibility will be still further
increased.
It is, however, somewhat remarkable that a greater number of
members do not avail themselves of the additional opportunities of
Additional reference to the library which have been afforded them,
facilities. an(j this brings me at once to the consideration of the
important question of the manner in which this Institution may be
made more useful to its members.
The state of the finances, as we have already seen, will prudently
permit the expenditure of a larger annual sum than we now disburse,
and therefore we are at full liberty financially to consider the ques-
tion of additional accommodation for the members, and I believe the
library of the Institution would be far more valuable if an arrange-
ment could be made by which it might be kept open in the evenings
for a certain number of days in the week, say until nine or ten o'clock.
I have ascertained that no practical obstacle to this extension of use
exists, and that the additional expense would not be considerable.
Most of the members of the Institution are necessarily engaged in
their ordinary daily professional duties during the only hours when
the library is at present available to them, and it is obvious that it is
only in the case of a special reference being required, or for some
statistical purpose, that the library can be useful to members generally
under the present arrangement.
I can say from my own experience that I should have felt it a
great boon, as a young man, to have had the opportunity of spending
an occasional evening in the library, and of reading and consulting
the rich record of professional learning and experience now collected
there, and therefore I throw out this hint respecting the extension of
the hours for reading.
Another step might probably be taken with great advantage to
students and engineers generally, viz. the systematic collection of
good working drawings, specifications, and contracts for important
works in progress or completed, with facility for reference to them
in the library, and permission to make tracings or copies.
There can be little doubt that engineers in large practice would
permit copies to be taken of their working drawings and specifications
PKESIDENTIAL ADDRESS 391
for this purpose, and in addition to this assistance with respect to
drawings, it would not be difficult to obtain permission for the in-
spection of the works themselves, during their execution, so that
young engineers might have the opportunity, especially during the
summer months, of seeing works as they are carried out, and com-
paring them with the drawings and specifications to which they have
had access in the library.
I would also venture to suggest that, in addition to the greater
advantage which may be conferred on those using the library by
extended time of access to it, and to the collection of working draw-
ings and specifications, with arrangements for inspection of practical
works, a limited number of lectures would be very valuable if given
by members who were especially conversant with any given subject,
on other evenings than those of the ordinary meetings during the
session of the Institution.
I now approach a question in connection with the Institution and
its functions upon which, in common with the profes- NEWBUILD-
sion generally, I confess I feel very strongly, and that is, ING-
the necessity of providing as soon as possible a building more com-
modious and more convenient than that which we now possess.
Our rapidly increasing numbers have already reached the point
when, as I have previously stated, the theatre in which we are now
assembled is admittedly insufficient for the accommodation of those
who wish to attend our discussions ; and, in addition to inadequate
space, there are conditions inseparably attached to the present building
which prevent this room being properly ventilated and rendered
comfortable.
The other rooms of this building are also totally inadequate for
the ordinary purposes for which they are required, and on the even-
ings of our annual conversazione especially, the crowding and dis-
comfort are such as to repel many of our best friends from venturing
to be present with us.
With a proper building and well-arranged rooms, we shall also be
able to have many objects of professional interest for our inspection
and study, of which we are at present deprived — such as models of
work and machinery, new articles or new combinations, or, possibly,
even a good museum.
I hope, however, we shall shortly be in a position to consider a
distinct proposal for a new building, worthy of the present position
and the future requirements of the Institution.
392 APPENDIX
Having now frankly brought before the Institution some of the
more important matters which appear calculated to influence the
future of the members of our profession, permit me to
CONCLUSION. . , . , , , T
say, in conclusion, that I am not sanguine enough to
expect that I shall accomplish more in this Address than direct
the thoughts and attention of my professional brethren to the
subject, and induce others more able than myself to take it up.
It cannot be doubted that the rapidly increasing prominence and
importance of our profession imposes upon us grave responsibility
and the duty of vigilant watchfulness, so that the character of our
members, and the success of our works, may be all that greater
knowledge, wider experience, and more cultivated taste ought to
make them, and that every new work of importance may be better
than that which has preceded it, and remain as a monument of
progress of which all may be proud.
It is not now sufficient that an engineering work should be durable
and free from failure, but, with our present means of study and of
knowledge, it will be expected that our works should display in a
satisfactory degree the qualities of fitness, economy, and taste, in
addition to that of durability.
With deeper study and more complete preparation, the love of our
profession and pride in its noble works will become greater and
greater in its students, and lead to that intense devotion and applica-
tion which history teaches us has alone produced the greatest works
in art and science ; and we cannot doubt that far greater triumphs
remain to be, and will be, achieved,, by those whom I now see before
me, than have yet been realised by either ancient or modern engineers.
Amidst all the excitement of our professional avocations, how-
ever, let us constantly bear in mind, and endeavour to imitate, the
example of the distinguished men who have been removed from
amongst us during the last few years in the happy manner in which
they succeeded in combining personal friendship with professional
rivalry, and in their never-failing interest in the prosperity and
usefulness of this Institution.
INDEX
Abernethy, Mr., 204.
Aboo Hammed, 344.
Aboo Simbel, The rock temples at, 217.
Abyssinia, 331, 343.
Account of the Great Floods of August,
1829, etc., Lander's, 351.
Ahnas, Excavations at, 353.
Aire and Calder Navigation, The, 18,20.
Airy, Sir George, 296, 297.
Alexandra Park Extension Railway,
The, 123.
Alexandria, Harbour works at, 236,
242 ; projected canal from, 255, 256.
Alloa Bridge, The, 276.
Allport, Mr., 82.
Ambukol, 343, 344.
Ancholme drainage, The, 138.
Anderson, James, 279.
Anio, The River, 195, 2'01.
Annual Register, The, 351.
Appleby, Messrs., 243-246, 249 (note).
Argyll, The Duke of, 224.
Armstrong, Sir W. , now Lord, 120, 205,
209, 236, 238-242, 262.
Armstrong, 134.
Arrivabene, Count C., 193.
Arrol, William, aft. Sir, 299, 302, 306,
311, 313.
Arterial drainage, 137.
Artillery engineering, 382.
Ashburton, Lady, 331.
Ashton- under -Lyne and Manchester
Railway, The, 78.
Ashwell, James, 387.
Assouan, 238, 265, 343.
Australia, Visit to, 275.
2 c 2
B
Baker, Sir Benjamin, 107, 114, 118,
147, 157, 159, 166-169, 171, 178,
197, 255, 256, 265, 280, 281, 282
(note), 283, 284, 288, 291, 294, 296,
298, 300, 301, 304-306, 309, 311-
314, 316, 331, 354.
Baker, Sir Samuel, 224, 340.
Bakewell, Mr., 235.
Baldry, Mr., 265, 321, 331, 358 ; letter
to, 115.
Ballochney Railway, The, 55, 57.
Bankers' Magazine, The, 66.
Barlow, Harrison, and Fowler, Messrs.,
280.
Barnet Extension Railway, The, 123.
Barrage of the Nile, The Grand, 262,
267-269.
Barrot Bey, 244, 265, 271.
Barry, J. W., aft. Sir, 158.
Bateman, La Trobe, 179, 180.
Beaconsfield, Lord. See Disraeli.
Bedford Level, The, 142, 143.
Belgian railways, The, 128.
Belgians, The King of the, 252.
Belmore, Earl, 207, 208.
Ben More, 330.
Beni-Hassan, The walls at, 219; tombs
at, 353.
Beni-Mazar, 233.
Beni-Sooef, 233.
Benson, Archbishop, 332.
Benson, Arthur, 332.
Bentham, Jeremy, 118.
Bentinck, Lord George, 132.
Berber, 249, 344, 345 ; proposed rail-
way to, 342.
394
INDEX
Beyer and Peacock, Messrs., 171.
Bidder, George Parker, 99, 123, 139,
146, 320, 366, 388.
Biggart, A. S., 306, 313.
Binns, Jonathan, 44, 45.
Birket-el-karon, Lake, 261.
Birmingham, 20, 23.
Bischoff, Mr., 44, 45.
Bitter Lakes, The, 226.
Board of Trade, The, 68, 72,73, 77, 101.
Bondholders, The, 268, 269, 271.
Bouch, Thomas, aft. Sir, 279, 280, 296.
Boulag, Ferry at, 236, 237.
Box Tunnel, The, 169.
Bradley, Foster, Rastrick,and Co., The
iron foundry of, 23.
Brady, Francis, 158.
Braemore, 182, 322, 330, 355.
Bramwell, Sir F. J., 232.
Bricks, The use of, 372.
Bridge Creek, The, 161.
Brierley, Oswald, 224.
Bristol and Clifton Railway, The, 183.
Bristow, Mr., 39, 42.
Britannia Bridge,The, 97, 281, 283,308.
British Association, The, John Fowler's
address to, 163.
Brittain, Thomas, 22.
Broadbent, Miss Elizabeth, 117.
Broom Loch, 322, 329, 330 ; River,
325 ; Valley, 325.
Brundell of Doncaster, Mr., 17.
Brunei, Isambard K., 31, 60, 75, 148,
169, 320, 354, 388 ; patent shield of,
177 ; bridge of, at Maidenhead, 31-33.
Brunei, Isambard, 32.
Brunton, Spencer, 305.
Bubastis, 353.
Burbeary, Mr., 36.
Burchell, Mr., 148.
Burr, Mr., 235.
Burton, Charles, 4 (note).
Bury, Edward, 80.
Cairns, Earl, 331.
Cairo, Projected canal between, and
Alexandria, 255, 256.
Campden Hill Tunnel, The, 167.
"Cantilever" bridges, 281.
Carlyle, Thomas, 331.
Cataract Incline, The, 239.
Cataracts, The, 236, 238.
Cement, The use of, 372.
Central Railway Terminus, Suggested,
146.
Chabim Pasha, 235.
Chambers, Mr., 235.
Channel Ferry, A, 203.
Chapel Town Iron Works, 38.
Charles!., 134.
Cheops and Chephren Pyramids, The,
217.
Cherif Pasha, 244, 266.
Chester-Holyhead route, The, 123.
China, Bridges in, 283.
City, Number of persons entering the,
153.
City and South London Railway, The,
178.
Civil Engineer, Nature of the work
of a, 50-52, 370 et seq. ; knowledge
required by, 375 ; preparation re-
quired by, 382.
Civil Engineers, Minutes of the Insti-
tution of, 18.
Clarence Railway, The, 56, 57.
Clarke, Seymour, 127, 128.
Cleopatra's Needle, 266, 267.
Clerkenwell Tunnel, The, 167.
Cobbett, T. G., 77.
Coiseau, Mons., 306.
Collinge, Charles, 387.
Colville, Lord, 127, 305.
Commercial Crisis of 1847-8, Evans's,
66 (note).
Commissioners of the Egyptian Debt,
The, 272.
Cooper's Hill, Engineering College at,
187.
Cooper, F. E., 306, 311.
Corrie Halloch Waterfall, 325.
Counters Creek Sewer, The, 161.
Cranbrook, Lord, 187, 331.
Cranes, Hydraulic, 120.
Craven Arms Railway, The, 123.
Crofters, The future of the, 347.
Cubitt, William, aft. Sir, 80, 98, 388.
INDEX
395
D
Dabbeh, 243, 342, 343.
Dalhousie, Lord, 74.
Damietta branch of the Nile, The, 262.
Darfour, 260, 340, 341.
Darfour Survey, The, 246, 247 (note).
Darlington and Newcastle Railways,
The, 24.
Daroot, 237.
Davidson of Tulloch, Mr., 182.
Debba, 248.
Delta, Irrigation of the, 232, 259
et seq.
Denison, Mr., 80.
Dent- Dent, John, 305, 345.
Derby, The Earl of, 270.
Der el-Bahri, The Theban temple of,
353.
Devon, The Earl of, 78.
Dickens, Col., 188.
Diglis Weir, 260.
Disraeli, The Rt. Hon. Benjamin, M.P.,
aft. Earl of Beaconsfield, 132, 227,
336 ; letter from, 126,
Dixon, Hannah, 4 (note).
Dixon, Mr., 266.
Dock and harbour engineering, 377.
Docks, Construction of, 93.
Dodsworth, Roger, 5.
Dongola, 342, 343.
Donkin, Bryan, 387.
Douai and Rheims Railway, The, 120.
Dougal and Paterson, Messrs., 310.
Dover Harbour, 205, 210.
Drainage engineering, 378.
Dredge, James, 278 (note).
Drome, Loch, 324, 326.
Drunkie, Loch, 180.
Dual Control, The, 273.
Dunrobin, 182.
Duport, Mr., 243, 244.
Dyson, Mr., 21, 22.
E
East Lincolnshire Railway, The, 59,
77, 79.
Eastern Counties Railway Company,
The, 74, 89, 150.
Eastwood, Rev. J., 4 (note).
Ecclesfield, History of the Parish of,
4 (note).
Ecclesfield Volunteers, The, 1, 2.
Ecclesfield Church, 5 ; parish, 5.
Edfoo, 241.
Edgeware, Highgate, and London Rail-
way, The, 123.
Egypt Exploration Fund, The, 352-354.
Egypt, Sir John Fowler in, 212 et seq.;
the finances of, 273 ; the state of,
337-45.
El Fashr, 340.
Elgin and Kincardine, The Earl of, 305.
Ellenborough, Lord, 192.
Elstob, 134.
" Emerald " Coach, The, 26, 360.
Engineer and Railway Volunteer Staff
Corps, The, 182.
Engineer, Knowledge required by a
civil, 375 ; preparation required by,
382.
Engineer's work, Nature of an, 50-52,
370 et seq. ; Sir John Fowler's views
upon, 61.
Engineering, 279, 289, 296, 300, 302.
Engineering pupil, An, 384 ; the work
of in the "thirties," 16.
Engineering problems, 367-369.
England in Egypt, 271 (note).
English Illustrated Magazine, The, 283.
Ensor, Mr., 235.
Euston Square, Passengers to and from,
153.
Fairbairn, William, 98, 99, 308.
Falkiner, T. H., 306, 311.
Falshaw, James, aft. Sir, 16.
Fayoum, The, 261.
Fenchurch Street Station, Passengers
to and from, 153.
Fens, The drainage of the, 134 et seq.
Ferguson, Mrs., 247.
Field, Joshua, 387, 388.
Findhorn River, Bridge over the, 358.
Fitzwilliam, Earl, 14.
Fleet, The, 162, 163.
Forth, Ferries across the, 276, 277.
396
INDEX
Forth Bridge, The, 12, 203, 276 ct seq.;
material used in building, 305.
Forth Railway Company, The, 280, 305.
Forth Steam Ferry, The, 208.
Fowler, Arthur, 265.
Fowler, John, baptism of, 1 ; helps to
raise a regiment of Volunteers, 1 ; be-
comes a land surveyor, 2 ; marriage
of, 3 ; methodical habits of, 3 ; letter
from, to his son, 175.
Fowler, Charles, 4.
Fowler, Frederick, 4, 360.
Fowler, Henry, 4, 56.
Fowler, John (son of Samuel), 4 (note).
Fowler, John, aft. Sir, birth of, 1, 3 ;
vigour of, 6 ; school days of, 6, 7 ; his
devotion to cricket, 7, 321 ; interest
in engineering, 7 ; early training in
engineering, 8 ; his study of the
Bible, 9 ; his destructive habits as a
child, 10 ; his power of imagination,
10, 11 ; his connection with the
Leather family, 13 ; first experience
in railway work, 13, 14 ; leaves his
father's roof, 18 ; at Birmingham,
20, 23 ; goes to London, 26 ; his first
appearance before a Parliamentary
Committee, 30 ; re-engages with
Mr. Rastrick, 38 ; surveying in
Cumberland, 38 et seq. ; contem-
plates opening offices in Sheffield,
46 ; his affection for Mr. Rastrick,
47 (note) ; enters J. T. Leather's
office, 48 ; superintends the making
of the Stockton and Hartlepool
Railway, 49, 53 ; his fondness of
work, 53 ; in London on Parlia-
mentary business, 55 ; works on
which he was engaged, 59, 60 ; his
views upon an engineer's duty, 61 ;
his relations with Edward Watkin,
82 ; his policy as an engineer, 85 ;
on railway accidents, 101 ; his pro-
fessional characteristics, 105 et seq. ;
his skill before Parliamentary Com-
mittees, 108 ; his expeditions, 113,
123, 132 ; his marriage, 117 ;
thoughts of entering Parliament,
120, 121 ; his Highland home, 121 ;
his professional engagements from
1850-60, 122 «t seq. ; his connection
with Irish railways, 124 ; catches
his first salmon, 125 ; appointed a
member of the Irish Railways Com-
mission, 128 ; his work on the Nene
Improvement and Norfolk Estuary,
134 et seq. ; his speech on arterial
drainage at the Institution of Civil
Engineers, 138 ; his work on the
Metropolitan Railway, 145 et seq. ;
his evidence before the Select Com-
mittee on Metropolitan communica-
tions, 149; his address to the British
Association in 1882, 163, 190 ; his
proposed locomotives for the Under-
ground Railway, 169 ; reports on
the Glasgow waterworks, 179-181 ;
purchases Braemore, 182 ; joins the
Engineer and Railway Volunteer
Staff Corps, 182 ; his principal work
from 1860-70,183; elected President
of the Institution of Civil Engineers,
183 ; his interest in engineering
education, 185 ; visits Norway, 188 ;
visits India, 189 ; his episode with
General Garibaldi, 193-202 ; engineer
of the Channel ferry scheme, 203 ;
his visit to Egypt, 212 et seq. ; his
faculty for enjoyment, 213 ; his
expedition up the Nile with the
Prince of Wales, 220 ; his memo-
randum on the irrigation of Egypt,
224 ; inspects the Suez Canal, 225
et seq. ; appointed general engineer-
ing adviser to the Egyptian Govern-
ment, 229 ; diaries of his Egyptian
sojourns, 236 ; created a K.C.M.G.,
274 ; his work in connection with
the Forth Bridge, 276 et seq. ; his
distrust of the Tay Bridge, 279:
created a baronet, 311 ; honours
conferred on, 316; in his home,
318-64 ; his dinners, 320 ; his habits,
321 ; his devotion to children, 335 ;
his political opinions, 336 ; selected
Conservative candidate for Hallam-
shire, 345 ; his collection of pictures,
350 ; his favourite books, 351 ; his
INDEX
397
connection with the Egypt Explor-
ation Fund, 352 ; the regard he paid
to his health, 354 et seq. ; illness of,
358, 359 ; death, 360 ; his Presi-
dential Address to the Institution of
Civil Engineers, 365 et seq.
Correspondence of, with his father,
18-21, 25, 30, 35, 37 et seq., 52, 53,
55, 322; with Mr. Baldry, 115;
with his wife, 119 et seq., 309 ; with
his grandfather, 28; with J. T.
Leather, 49 ; with B. Disraeli, 127 ;
with General Garibaldi, 198 ; with
a chi]d, 221 ; with General Gordon,
246-255.
Fowler, Joshua, 4 (note).
Fowler, Lady, 321, 333, 350.
Fowler, Mrs., Death of, 4.
Fowler, Rev. Montague, 274, 332.
Fowler, Robert, 4.
Fowler, Samuel, 4 (note).
Fowler, William, 4.
Fowler and Baker, Messrs., 280.
Francis, Mr,, 64-66, 68, 69.
Fraser, Mr., 83.
French, Baron, 193.
Frodsham and Co., Messrs., 236.
G
Gainsford, R. I., 76.
Gale, Mr., 179, 180.
Gal way, Lord, 17.
Garibaldi, General, 193-202 ; his pro-
ject for draining the Campagna, 195.
Garnkirk and Glasgow Railway, The,
57.
Garve, 324, 326.
Gatget, Mr., 264.
Gathorne-Hardy, Alfred, 359.
Gatty, Dr., 2, 13.
Ghizeh, 237 ; the Pyramids of, 217.
Gibbs, Mr., 248.
Girder bridges, 97, 98, 99.
Girouard, Lieut., 251.
Gladstone, Right Hon. W. E., M.P.,
227, 327 ; interest of in the Under-
ground Railway, 173.
Glasgow and City Railway, The, 183.
Glasgow Waterworks, The, 179.
Glen Mazeran, 121, 322.
Glyn, Mr., 67.
Golborne, 134.
Gooch, Mr., 21, 22.
Goole, Ship-lock at, 18.
Gordon, Col., aft. Gen., Charles G.,
244 et seq., 266, 271-273, 337-345.
Goschen, The Right Hon. G. J., M.P.,
270, 271.
Grand Junction Canal, The, 150.
Grand Junction Railway, The, 64.
Grantham, R. B., 137.
Granton and Burntisland, Ferry service
between, 276-8.
Granville, Earl, 234 (note).
Great Central Railway, The, 84, 356.
Great Eastern Railway, The, 80.
Great Grimsby, 94 ; Dock Companies
of, 78.
Great Grimsby and Sheffield Junction
Railway, The, 78.
Great Grimsby and Potteries Railway,
The, 59.
Great Grimsby Extension, The, 59.
Great Grimsby Railway, The, 59, 77,
88.
Great Grimsby Works, 59.
Greathead, J. H., 178.
Great Northern Railway, The, 79-84,
149, 151, 170, 279, 356.
Great Northern Railway. History of
the, Grinling's, 17, 79.
Great Northern and Western of Ireland
Railway, The, 124.
Great Western Railway, The, 111,
148, 149, 151, 170, 356 ; a collision
on, 73.
Greaves' mines, Messrs., A pumping
operation at, 19.
Grurity Fen, 143, 144.
Hammersmith and City Railway, The,
123.
Hancock, W. Neilson, LL.D., 128.
Handak, 343.
Hanneck, 243, 245, 343.
Harcourt, Sir William Vernon, 321,
331.
398
INDEX
Harris, Lord, 172, 173.
Hartlepool Docks, 56, 57.
Hartlepool Junction Railway, The, 55.
Hassan, Prince, 331.
Hawkshaw, John, aft. Sir, 148, 158,
320, 366, 388.
Heneage, Edward, M.P., 77.
Henry VIII., Holbein's picture of, 280.
Heracleopolis Magna, Excavations at,
353.
Heygate, W. Unwin, 305.
Hieroglyphics, Egyptian, 222.
Highland Railway, The, 182.
Hill, Sir Rowland, 149.
Hindlip, Lord, 305.
History of Hallamshire, Hunter's, 2,
13.
History of the English Railway,
Francis's, 64, 65, 73.
History of the Great Northern Railway,
Grinling's, 17, 79.
History of Wisbech and the Fens,
Walker and Craddock's, 135.
Holborn Valley Viaducts, 148.
Holmes, Captain, 4.
Huddart, 134.
Huddersfield, 83.
Hudson, George, 67, 80, 81, 89, 119.
Hudson, Mrs., 119.
Humber Survey, The, 59.
Hunt, Ward, 206.
Hunter's History of Hallamshire, 2, 13.
Hussein, H.H. Prince, 266.
Hutchinson, the contractor, 52, 53.
I
Ibrahimia and Yoosef Canal, The, 237.
Ilchester, The Earl of, 207.
Inchgarvie, The island of, 281, 291,
295, 306.
India, Visit to, 275.
Indian Railways, 188, 189.
Inner Circle Railway, The, 158, 159.
Institution of Civil Engineers, The,
137; John Fowler's presidential ad-
dress to, 184, 365 et seq. ; growth of
membership, 355, 387, 388 ; history
of, 387 ; finances of, 389 ; library of,
390.
International Communications Bill,
The, 203.
Inverbroom, 322.
Irish industries, 128.
Irish railways, Proposed Treasury Com-
mission on, 126 et seq. ; negotiations,
for the amalgamation of, 131.
Iron, The use of, 373.
Irrigation, The question of, 232, 259.
Ismail Pasha, 216, 229, 232 et seq.,
265 et seq.
Ismail Pasha Ayoub, 242-4.
Ismailia and Sweet-water Canal, The,
257.
Janson, Mr., 243-246, 248.
Jay, Mr., 173.
Jhelum and Rawalpindi Railway, The,
189.
John Stirling, The, 278.
Johnson, Mr., 123, 173.
Johnstone, Christopher, 128.
Jones, James, 387.
Joubert, Mons., 271.
K
Karnak, The temple of, 217, 218, 220.
Katrine, Loch, 180.
Kelvin, Lord, 317.
Khartoum, 234, 243, 251, 340, 341,
344, 345.
Khedive, The. See Ismail Pasha.
Kidd, Dr., 359.
Kinderley, Charles, 134, 136.
Kinderley's Cut, 136.
King's Cross Station, Passengers to and
from, 153.
King's Scholar Pond Sewer, The, 162.
Kitchener, Lord, 251.
Knowles, Mr., 236.
Kobe Bridge, 245.
Kordofan, 260, 340-2.
Koroor, 238.
Korosko, 251.
Labelye, 134.
Laffan, Captain, 100.
INDEX
399
Lancaster Guardian, The, 75.
Lauder, Sir Thomas Dick, 351.
Lawes, Captain, 86.
Lawrence, Lord, 207.
Leather, George, 13-15, 18, 20-22, 25,
31, 37.
Leather, J. T., 7, 13, 20, 48, 52, 53,
55.
Lecky, W. E. H., 195.
Leeds to Glasgow, Projected line from,
77.
Lesseps, Ferdinand de, 190, 191, 216,
220, 225-227, 255, 258, 259, 272,
273.
Letheby, Dr., 232.
Lethbridge, John T. , 387.
Letters from the North, Burt's, 351.
Lewin, Sir Gregory, 56.
Life of Gordon, Boulger's, 272.
Lime, Kinds of, 372.
Liverpool, 22.
Liverpool and Manchester Railway Bill,
The, 15, 24.
Liverpool Central Station, 183.
Liverpool, Scheme of river approaches
at, 367, 368.
Locke, Joseph, 22-25, 75, 146, 148,
320, 354, 367, 388.
Loftie, Rev. W. J., 160.
London, A journey from Birmingham
to, 27.
London Bridge lines, Passengers at,
153.
London, Chatham, and Dover Railway,
The, 205, 207, 211.
London, Tilbury, and Southend Rail-
way, The, 122.
London and Birmingham Railway,
The, 64, 67.
London and Brighton Railway, The,
25, 26, 28, 29, 150.
London and Exeter Railway, The, 66.
London and North Western Railway,
The, 82, 149.
London and South Western Railway,
The, 146, 150, 151, 153.
Lowe, Dr., 235.
Lowe, Robert, 172, 184.
Lucan, Lord, 124, 125.
M
McAlister, Dr., 283.
Me Clean, John Robinson, 366, 388.
MacNeill, Sir John, 58.
Magaga, 233, 237.
Mahatta, 240.
Maidenhead Bridge, 31-33.
Making of the Land of England, Pell's,
144.
Manby, Mr., 389.
Manchester, 22.
Manchester and Birmingham Extension
Railway Bill, The, 47.
Manchester and Birmingham Railway,
The, 25.
Manchester, Sheffield, and Lincolnshire
Railway, The, 14, 77-79, 81-84, 90,
93, 95, 208.
Manchester and Lincoln Railway, The,
78.
Manchester Ship Canal, The, 319.
Mareotis, Lake, 256.
Marriott, General, 245.
Matai, 233.
Maudsley, Nicholas, 387.
Maudsley, Thomas, 387.
Mechanical Engineering, 380.
Mehemet Ali, 262.
Meik, P. W., 306.
Meley, Mr., 235.
Merchant Venturers' School, John
Fowler's address to, 178, 185, 219,
307.
Mersey Board, The engineer of the,
368.
Metropolitan Communications, Select
Committee on, 149, 152 et scq.
Metropolitan District, Population of
the, 153.
Metropolitan District Railway, The,
46, 158, 183; cost of, 159; level
and gradients of, 160, 163 ; dis-
coveries during the construction of,
165 ; method of construction, 166,
167.
Metropolitan Railway, The, 46, 145
et seq., 183 ; commencement of the
works, 157 ; cost of, 159 ; level and
gradients of, 160, 163 ; method of
400
INDEX
construction, 166, 167; early engines
on, 170, 171 ; opening of, 172.
"Metropolitan Railways," Sir B.
Baker's paper on, 147.
Metropolitan railways, Mileage etc., of,
174.
Mid-Kent route, The, 123.
Midland Railway, The, 13, 81, 83, 279 ;
opposition of the Sheffield people
to, 14.
Millais, J. E., Portrait of Sir John
Fowler by, 184.
Mill wall Docks, 183.
Milner, Sir Alfred, 271 (note).
Minghetti, Signor, 196, 198.
Minieh, 233, 237.
Mining engineering, 381.
Minster, The, 226, 249.
Moeris, Lake, 261.
Mohammed Abusamra, 237.
Moncrieff, Sir Colin Scott, 262, 265.
Monkland and Kirkintilloch Railway,
The, 55, 57.
Monnier, Mons., 241.
Mont Cenis Tunnel, The, 367, 368.
Moon, Richard, aft. Sir, 127.
Morecambe Bay, The embanking of,
39, 40.
Morecambe Bay Railway, The, 45, 46.
Moreton, The Earl of, 207.
Morning Chronicle, The, 74.
Morris, William, 313, 314.
Morrison, James, 68, 74, 75 (note).
Mortar, The use of, 372.
Much Wenlock and Coalbrookdale
Railways, The, 123.
Mulholland, John, 128.
Mundell, Walter, 348.
Municipalism, 155.
Murchison, Sir Roderick, 330.
Murcott, Mr., 235.
Mycerinus, The Pyramid of, 217.
Mylne, W. C., 134.
N
Napier of Magdala, Lord, 282.
Napoleon I. , 260.
Napoleon III., 225.
Nasmyth, James, 279.
Natala, The, 261.
Nature, 296.
Naval Architecture, 381.
Nene Improvement Commission, The
123, 134 et seq.
Nene Outfall, The, 136.
Nene Valley Drainage Commissioners,
The, 136.
New Dongola, 343.
New Holland, Construction of docks
at, 93 ; floating bridge at, 95, 208,
209.
New Holland Railway, The, 77.
Nile, The, 234, 242, 257, 259 et seq. ;
343-345 ; an expedition up, 220,
Nile Valley, The, 342, 343.
Nineteenth Century, The, Articles on
railway accidents in, 101 ; on pro-
posal for a Channel ferry, 209, 210 ;
on a canal between Cairo and Alex-
andria, 255 ; on bridge construction,
283.
Norfolk Estuary, The, 123, 134 et seq.
North British Railway, The, 58, 279,
280.
North Eastern Railway, The, 57, 279.
North Level Commissioners, The, 136.
North London Railway, The, 146, 151.
" North Metropolitan Railway, The,"
etc., 145.
Norway, A visit to, 188.
Norwegian railways, 188.
Nubar Pasha, 215, 242, 273.
Nyanza, The P. & 0. ss., 215.
Ocean telegraphy, 367, 369.
Oldham waterworks, The, 31.
Omdurman, Recovery of a chronometer
at, 236.
Onias, The exploration of, 353.
Oswestry and Dolgelly Line, The, 183.
Ottoman Power, The, Abandonment of
the exclusive policy of, 228.
Our Iron Hoods, Williams's, 75.
Owen, Mrs., 172.
Owen, Professor, 172, 215, 220, 224-
226, 330, 331.
INDEX
401
Oxford, Worcester, and Wolverhamp-
ton Railway, The, 60, 122.
Oxyrhynchus papyri, The, 353.
Paddington and Moorgate, Steam
carriages between, 145.
Paddington Station, Passengers to and
from, 153.
Page, 134, 146.
Paget, Sir A., 198.
Palmer, Henry Robinson, 387.
Palmerston, Lord, 173, 225.
Parliament and Railway Competition,
68-70.
Pax Britannica, The, 230, 231.
Peacock, Mr., 148.
Pearson, Charles, 146-8, 152, 171, 177.
Peto and Betts, Messrs., 81.
Petrie, Flinders, 219.
Philistine, A real, 223.
Phillips, Joseph, 306, 313.
Pihl, Carl, 188.
Pole, Mr., 99, 100.
Post Office, The, and the Metropolitan
Railway, 149.
Potter, James, 47.
Pyramids, The, 217.
Q
Queen Square Place, 117, 320.
Queensferry, 277, 279, 281, 292, 297.
R
Raglan, Lord, 207.
Railway Chronicle, The, 73.
Railway Commission, The, 97, 100,
102, 147.
Railway engineering, 376.
Railway extensions, 146.
Railway mania, The, 60, 64 et seq.
Railway system of England, The, 85.
Hailway System, S. Sidney's, 86.
Railways of Great Britain and Ireland,
Whishaw's, 57.
Rameses, The statue of, 217, 219.
Ranelagh Sewer, The, 161.
Rastrick, J. U., 23-26, 29, 30, 35, 36,
39, 40, 42, 44, 46, 47, 75.
Re-afforesting, Sir J. Fowler's experi-
ment in, 324.
Red Sea, The crossing of the, 223.
Regent's Canal Railway, The, 146.
Regent's Park, Bridges in, 183.
Rendel and Knowles, Messrs., 236, 239.
Rendel, J. Meadows, aft. Sir, 94, 188,
354, 388.
Rendel, Stuart, aft. Lord, 262, 320.
Rennie, John, 134, 136.
Rennie, Sir John, 75, 134, 139, 141,
367, 388.
Renton, James Hall, 305.
Rheims and Douai Railway, The, 60.
Rhoda, 233, 237.
Riaz Pasha, 252.
Rider, Mr., 6.
Roberts, Mr., 125.
Roberts, Sir F., now Field - Marshal
Lord, 189.
"Rocket," Stephenson's, 25.
Roman Campagna, Projects for the
reclamation of the, 193 et seq.
Rosebery, Lord, 327.
Rosetta branch of the Nile, The, 262.
Rothschild, Alphonse de, 206.
Rough Notes of a Ride over the Track
of the Manchester, Sheffield, Lincoln-
shire, and other Railways, Sidney's,
87.
Rundall, Colonel, 264.
Russell, Scott, 96, 97, 148, 320.
Russell, W. H., 224.
S
Said Pasha, 249, 262.
St. Enoch's Station, Glasgow, 183.
St. John's Wood Railway, The, 158.
Sakieh, The, 261.
Salisbury, Lord, 250.
Sandside, 330.
Saunders, Mr., 67.
Scott, Thomas, 306.
Sedgwick, Professor, 330.
Senhouse, Sir Fleming, 43.
Serpentine, The, 183.
Severn Tunnel, The, 356.
Severn Valley Railway, The, 123.
Sewerage, System of, 367, 369.
402
INDEX
Shadoof, The, 261.
Sheffield and Lincolnshire Extension
Railway, The, 59, 78.
Sheffield and Lincolnshire Railway,
The, 76-78.
Sheffield and Manchester Railway, The,
23, 59.
Sheffield and Rotherham Railway, The,
14.
Sheffield, Barnsley, and Wakefield
Railway, The, 59.
Sheffield Victoria Station, 95.
Sheffield Waterworks, The, 20, 179.
Shellal, The Isle of, 238.
Shendy, 340, 344.
Shoreditch Station, Passengers to and
from, 153.
Sidney, Samuel, 86-9, 91, 95.
Siemens and Co., 265.
Siemens, Sir William, 308.
Simmons, Captain, now Field-Marshal
Sir Lintorn, 95, 96, 99, 100, 331.
Simpson, James, 98, 235, 388.
Sioot, 237.
Slamannan Railway, The, 57.
Slavery, The suppression of, 245 (note),
248.
Smeaton, John, 134.
Smiles, Dr. , his biography on Stephen-
son, 15.
Smith, Adam, on passenger transport,
71 (note).
Smith and Knight, Messrs., 173.
Smith of Deanston, 91.
Smith, W. H., 327.
Solymos, Mr., 235.
Soohag, 238.
Soudan, The abandonment of the, 340-5;
Railway, 232 et seq., 268 ; surveys of,
274, 275.
South Eastern Railway, The, 146, 150,
205, 207, 211.
Southern Cross, The, 329.
Spackman, Mr., 66.
Spearman, Sir Alexander T., Bart, 128.
Stanhope, Philip, 206.
Stanley, Charles, 176.
Steam carriages, 145.
Steel, The use of, 374.
Stephenson, Clark, and Co., Messrs.,
265.
Stephenson, George, 13, 14, 23-25, 146,
361 ; Smiles' Life of, 360.
Stephenson, Robert, 24, 70, 71, 75,
134, 136, 140, 146, 308, 320, 354,
367, 388.
Stevens, John Hargrave, 146, 148.
Stewart, Allan, 306, 313.
Stockton and Darlington Railway, The,
64.
Stockton and Hartlepool Railway, The,
49, 51, 56-58.
Stone, The use of, 371.
Stonehouse, Mr., 49.
Story of Chinese Gordon, Hake's, 273
(note).
Strachey, General, 188.
Suakin, Proposed railway from, 342.
Suez, Locks at, 257.
Suez Canal, The, 220, 224 et seq., 255,
367-369.
Sugar, The manufacture of, 232, 233.
Surveys, Opposition of landowners to,
16.
Sutherland, The Duke of, 182, 188,
196, 198, 215, 220, 224, 225, 227.
Swann, Elizabeth, 3, 4 (note).
Swann of Dykes Hall, William, 3.
Swanwick, Mr., 21, 22.
Tancred, Arrol, and Co., Messrs., 287.
Tancred, Sir Thomas S., 305.
Tapton, 23.
Tay Bridge, The first, collapse of, 279,
296.
Tay Bridge, The second, 278.
Telegraphic engineering, 381.
Telford, 387, 388.
Tenterden, Lord, 267.
Tewkesbury Lecture, The, 216 (note),
227, 233, 259, 264.
Thebes, 238, 261.
Theyer, Frederick, 360.
Thiers, Mons., 206.
Thompson, Sir E. Maunde, 352.
Thompson, M. W., 305 ; created a
Baronet, 311.
INDEX
403
Thorneycroft of Wolverhampton, Mr.,
308.
Thorn wood Lodge, 321.
Tiber, Inundations of the, 193.
Tilbury Railway, The, 45.
Timber, The use of, 374.
Times, The, 67, 184, 259 ; letters from
Sir John Fowler to, 224, 337.
Tomlinson, jun., James, 158.
Toorah, Quarries, The, 217.
Torksey Bridge, The, 95, 98.
Torlonia, Prince, 196.
Tredgold on wind- pressure, 296.
Trent, Bridges over the, 95.
Trossachs, The, 179.
Tunnelling, Method of, 177.
Turkish Railways, The, 123.
Turner, Mr., 23, 27.
Tweeddale, The Marquis of, 305.
Ty-Bourne, The, 161, 163.
Tyndall, Professor, 11.
U
Ullapool, 325, 330.
Underdown, Robert George, 208.
Underground Railway. See Metropoli-
tan Railway.
Vennacher, Loch, 180.
Vermuyden, Sir Cornelius, 134.
Victoria Station and Pimlico Railway
Co., The, 132.
Vignoles, Mr., 14, 75, 97, 146.
Vivian, C., aft. Lord, 266-8.
Voisin, Mons., 225.
W
Wadsley Hall, 1-4 (note).
Wady Haifa, 234, 241, 246, 248, 250,
342, 343.
Wady Mokatten, The, 344.
Wake, Bernard, 7 (note), 76.
Wakefield, Brigg, and Goole Railway,
The, 59.
Wakefield, Pontefract, and Gooie Rail-
way, The, 59.
Wales, T.R.H. the Prince and Princess
of, 220, 224, 311.
Walker, James, 388.
Walker of Limehouse, Mr., 24.
Watanabe, Kaichi, 282 (note).
Water supply, Some problems of, 181,
367, 369.
Waterhouse, B.A., Alfred, 315.
Waterworks engineering, 378.
Watkin, Edward, aft. Sir, 82.
Watte, 134.
Weardale Railway, The, 15.
Webster, Hannah, 4 (note).
West Bourne, The, 161, 163.
West Cumberland and Furness Rail-
way, The, 42, 43, 46.
West Hartlepool Harbour and Railway
Co., The, 57.
Westerdyke, 134.
Westhofen, W., 279, 306.
WharnclifFe, Lord, 38.
White Ridley, Sir Matthew, Bart, 305.
Whitley Hall, 6.
Whitton, Mr., 4.
Whitton, Mrs., 359.
Wicker Viaduct, The, 95.
" Widening " Tunnel, The, 167.
Wieland, G. B., 305.
Wild, Mr., 99, 100.
Wilkinson, Mr., 198, 200.
William Mure, The, 278.
Williams, E. Leader, aft. Sir, 319.
Wilson, Edward, 158.
Wilson, Erasmus, aft. Sir, 266.
Wilson, Rivers, 255, 273, 274.
Wilson, W., 201, 204.
Wincobank, 1.
Wishaw and Coltness Railway, The, 57.
Witham Drainage, The, 138.
Wolseley, Lord, Letter from, 274.
Wren, Sir Christopher, 371.
Yarborough, The Earl of, 77, 81.
York and Lancaster Line, The, 76.
York and North Midland Railway,
The, 64.
THIS BOOK IS DUE ON THE LAST DATE
STAMPED BELOW
RENEWED BOOKS ARE SUBJECT TO IMMEDIATE
RECALL
UC DAVIS - INTERLIBRARY LpAN
SF.NT
SEP 26 1994
DUE <H u/uo
OCT1
RETURNED
LIBRARY, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS
Book Slip-50m-12,'64(F772s4)458
3 1175 00450 5924
360206
Mackay, T.
The life of Sir
John Fowler.
TA1UO
F?
M2
PHYSICAL
SCIENCES
LIBRARY