m
m
■0^
FROM THE LIBRARY OF
REV. LOUIS FITZGERALD BENSON, D. D.
BEQUEATHED BY HIM TO
THE LIBRARY OF
PRINCETON THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY
THEOLOGICAl
>Hv
\5V«
mm
asca
THE
V
^
}Xt OF Pfij
NOV 13 1931
&,
LIFE AND TIMES
L SEV
OF
JOHN CALVIN,
THE GREAT REFORMER.
TRANSLATED FROM THE GERMAN OF
PAUL HENRY, D.D.,
MINISTER AND SEMINARY-INSPECTOR IN BERLIN.
BY
HENRY STEBBING, DJ).3 F.R.S.
AUTHOR OF ' HISTORY OF THE CHURCH AND REFORMATION ' IN LARDNER's CYCLO-
PAEDIA ; HISTORY OF THE CHURCH OF CHRIST FROM THE DIET OF AUGSBURG ;
LIVES OF THE ITALIAN POETS, ETC.
N TWO VOLUMES.
VOL. II.
LONDON:
WHITTAKER AND CO., AVE MARIA LANE.
1849.
PRINTED BY RICHARD AND JOHN E. TAYLOR,
RED LION COURT, FLEET STREET.
CONTENTS.
PART II.— Continued.
Chapter X.
Page
State of the Church in the years 1544 and 1545 1
Chapter XI.
The German War. — League of Smalcalde. — Defeat of the Pro-
testants.— Calvin writes against the Interim. — The Church of
England. — Calvin's literary labours 19
Chapter XII.
Anabaptists. — Spiritual libertines. — The antichristianity of Ge-
neva.— Political libertines opposed to the Refugees 41
Chapter XIII.
Fury of the_;libertines. — Anger and severity of Calvin. — Ameaux,
Perrin, and Gruet , 55
Chapter XIV.
Insults heaped on Calvin. — His resolution, inward peace, and con-
solation in friendship.— Viret 0,9
Chapter XV.
Efforts to re-establish peace. — Struggle on behalf of a Great
Church Union. — Agreement of the Zurichers on the Lord's
Supper 7
iv > "N N SI S.
Ch uti.k X\'I.
Page
I oion of great minds. — A plan to effect unity of doctrine and
discipline by a community of spirit— Harmony between Lu-
ther and Calvin in Living faith.— J^elancthon 84
PART III.
Chapter I.
Introductory remarks. — Characteristics of Calvin . . . . 103
Chapter II.
The outward condition -of the Church, and Calvin's circum-
stances at Geneva in the years 1550, 1551, 1552. — His work
' De Scandalis.' — Letters to Craumer and Melancthon 108
Chapter TIL
Tin first great controversy. — The dispute respecting Predesti-
nation.— Bolsec i 128
Chapter IV.
Calvin's second great controversy, on the Trinity, 1553. — Dispute
\\ itfa Servetus. — Its consequences 158
Chapter V.
tUS Condemned to death. — His last hours in prison. — His
i cution. — An inquiry into the circumstances attending it. —
l>< \i( w of hi- doctrim b 214
Chapter VI.
Otlur teachers of false doctrine respecting the Trinity. — Mat-
thseus Gribaldi. — Bland rata. — Gentilis — his system and history 263
CONTEXTS.
Chapter VII.
Page
Calvin's controversy with Westphal and Hesshus on the doctrine
of the Sacrament. — Rise and progress of the dispute. — Parties
engaged. — Results • 274
Chapter VIII.
Final struggle against the libertines. — Berthelier. — Triumph of
discipline. — Failure of Calvin's enemies. — Educational plans . . 306
i
Chapter IX.
Calvin's activity. — His influence in England and Scotland. — John
Knox. — Correspondence with the English exiles in Frankfort . . 326
Chapter X,
Calvin's relation to the Northern churches.—His influence in
Poland. — Correspondence with King Sigismund and with the
Polish nobles 340
Chapter XI.
Influence of Calvin in France. — Rapid development of the Refor-
mation in the fire of persecution. — Martyrs in the reign of
Henry II. at Lyons, Chambery, and other places. — Calvin's dis-
tress.— He exhorts the German princes to interfere. — Beginning
of the Church in Paris. — Emigration of the Reformed to Ame-
rica.— Heroic courage of the Confessors. — Anne du Bourg. —
Sketch of events preceding the Colloquy of Poissy. — Belief and
discipline of the French Church. — Unity of the Church under
Calvin's influence. — His success at its highest point. — ^Animat-
ing address to all the great personages in France belonging to
the Evangelical party 353
Chapter XII.
Beza at the Colloquy of Poissy, 1561. — His account to Calvin. —
Occurrences September 9, 1561. — The Reformed Church re-
cognized by the Edict of January 1562 380
\i CONTENTS.
Chapter XIII.
Page
First religious * ar. — The Peace. — 1562-1563 39G
Chapter XIV.
C'alviiiV latest controversies. — The false reports published by his
enemies. — Struggle against Balduin 410
Chapter XV.
Calvin takes leave of the world. — Review of the close of his life.
— J lis outward circumstances and inward state. — His last la-
bours.— Farewell address to the Ministers and to the council.
— General mourning. — Beza's character of Calvin 419
Appendix 437
Index 445
PART IT. — (continued.)
LIFE AND TIMES OF CALVIN.
PART IT.— Continued.
CHAPTER X.
STATE OF THE CHURCH IN THE YEARS 1544 AND 1545.
1 HE beginning of a letter from Calvin to Bullinger contains a
notice of the progress of the Gospel in France. He speaks of
the descendants of the Waldenses in Provence and Piedmont :
" Their piety and the innocence of their lives is such, that their
salvation must be precious in the eyes of every believer. Three
years ago they presented a copy of their confession to the par-
liament of Aix : it is pure and simple, and such a one as we our-
selves should have delivered. Do not believe that it was a zeal,
fair in appearance, but soon to vanish. They have been again
and again summoned before the tribunal ; have endured the
trial with unflinching firmness, and are still exposed to the most
cruel persecutions. The king himself proposes to examine and
judge their cause. Two commissaries have received command
to inquire, both publicly and secretly, into their doctrine and
manners. The brethren have no fear of these officers, for they
have ever so conducted themselves, that even their enemies bear
testimony to their integrity. Now bishops, prefects, and even
the parliament, are strenuously labouring to hinder the fulfil-
ment of the king's intentions ; and if the old rule be followed,
VOL. II. b
2 LETTER TO BULLINGER. [dlAP. X.
they will rouse up all the lions and wolves they can to rage
against them. But even if he be obeyed, they are not freed
from danger. They have already introduced the pure worship
of God into three cities, and into several villages, and have even
established a church purified from all papistical corruption. In
that church they celebrate baptism and the Lord's Supper ac-
cording to our usage.
" Now, the greater the clanger on all sides, the more must we
strive to be ready to afford help, especially since they exhibit so
noble an example of firmness ; and we should deserve, did we
forsake them, to be overwhelmed with shame. Add to this,
that the present matter does not concern them alone, for either
the way will be opened by their persecution to the rage of the
wicked against the churches, in all parts of the kingdom, or the
Gospel will by this means be everywhere diffused. What re-
mains therefore for us but to employ all our strength, lest our
pious brethren should perish through our sloth, and the door
be long closed to Christ? I have desired to say this to you, in
order that, should they seek refuge with you, your government
might be prepared to render them assistance. One of two
things must be done for them; that is, we must either induce
the king to exercise his promised good-will towards them, or
soften his anger, should it have been excited to their prejudice."
Thus it appears that the persecution which broke out in the
following year already threatened the unfortunate Waldenses.
We find Calvin busily occupied at Geneva, in 1545, in receiving
the sufferers, and affording them every possible kind of help.
Another storm also was now brooding over the church in
Germany. Charles had commenced in 1542 an expedition
against France; but this was concluded in 1544 by the peace
of Crespy3 and in a manner very advantageous to the French.
This course was adopted by the emperor, that he might employ
his whole activity against the league of Smalcalde. It had been
determined by the diet at Speier, that both parties should resolve
on certain points of reformation. In the expectation of carry-
ing this into effect, the states assembled in 1545 at Worms.
The Y-. ittenberg reformation, as the plan offered by the pro-
testants was called, had been sketched by Melancthon with the
greatest moderation. Paul III. opened the council in opposi-
tion to these proceedings, and in order to prevent the emperor
from interfering with religious affairs: this constrained Charles
to support the interests of the reformers.
A.D. 1544-45.] STATE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS. 3
During the hostilities in France and the disturbances in Ger-
many, the Gospel continued to advance ; and Beza shows how
the power of faith, exhibited by many Christians in their mar-
tyrdom, gave occasion to the further triumphs of the Holy Spirit.
It was just now that the violent persecution of the innocent
Waldenses was commenced, at the instigation of the cardinal
Tournon, and a certain Menyer d'Opede, governor of Provence.
They pretended to the king of France, that they would send the
unfortunate people to Marseilles, and convert the country into
a Swiss canton. The ardent and volatile Francis believed this
statement, and the accused were surrendered as a prey to their
persecutors, who assailed them with inconceivable cruelty, and
even ordered that the little children should be left to die of
hunger*. Those who escaped the persecution, and fled to the
mountains, obtained at their earnest entreaty a safe-conduct into
Germany. A part of these afterwards returned into their val-
leys, where, after the endurance of many persecutions, their de-
scendants are still existing.
Eeza has given in his history of the reformation in France, a
transcript of the i Instruction5 which Henry II. issued, at the
request of his dying father, who repented of the course which
he had pursued, against the persecutors of the Waldenses. We
learn from this instrument, and from the acknowledgment of
the persecutors themselves, the treacherous and barbarous cha-
racter of the persecution. Twenty-two villages were reported
as burnt, and their inhabitants were murdered without even the
form of a trial. Calvin, most deeply afflicted at the sufferings
of these unfortunate people, to whom he had formerly sent a
minister for their instruction in pure doctrine, so exerted him-
self on their behalf, that 4000 Waldenses found support in
Geneva. He instituted collections for themf. The council
allowed them to be employed on the public works, and opened
a way for them through Switzerland. In the year 1554 those
who still remained in Geneva obtained grants of land. Calvin
* " Les mamelles coupees a plusieurs femmes, aupres dcsquelles mortes
furent vus mourans dc faim les petits enfans, ayant fait crier le dit Opede sur
peine de la hard, qu'on ne donnat vivres ne soulagement quelconque a aucun
d'iceux. Tout fut pille, bruM, saccage, et ne furent sauves que ceux, que Pou-
lin choisit pour ses galeres, Les femraes rassemblees et brulces dans une
grange; 800 personnel tuees dans le temple." Leger in his account of his
country says, that the Eternal, who destined it to be the theatre of his mira-
cles and the asylum of his ark, had naturally and wonderfully fortified it.
(T. i. p. 9.)
t Reg. du 8 Juin 1545. — " Collection for the poor, made at the request of
Calvin, and which produced 70 florins."
B 2
4 CALVIN TO VIRET. [CHAP. X.
turned especially to the Swiss cantons and the German princes,
and pressed them to intercede strongly with France in behalf
of the Waldenses. Thus he wrote to Schaff hausen and to Bul-
linger, July 24, 1545, desiring that an embassy might be sent
to the king:—" You must assail their base opponents, and those
who are excited against them by false reports. The greater
number of these unhappy people are perishing in chains, others
are dispersed by flight. None dare venture even to indulge the
wish of ever again seeing their families. Continual attacks are
made, and that with the knowledge of the king, upon the lord-
ship of Avignon. Prisoners are carried from all sides to Paris,
and if some effort be not made to resist these proceedings, you
will soon hear that a vast conflagration is raging through the
wThole kingdom, and which the times will leave no chance of
extinguishing. Use all your influence therefore to promote the
sending of a respectable embassy, which may earnestly entreat
the king to free the prisoners, to restore their goods to those
who have fled, and to institute a fair inquiry into the faith and
manners of these pious sufferers."
Notwithstanding Calvin's active and zealous exertions, the
embassy, if we may judge from a letter to Viret, dated August
17, 1545, seems not to have been sent. In September he des-
patched two Waldenses to Viret, and wrote, " You will see that
Satan is using every means to turn the hearts of all against
them ; to prevent their receiving any help, and to exasperate the
feelings of the king and his courtiers, fierce as they already are,
still more to their prejudice. Even the Swiss are greatly dis-
tressing me by supposing that I am bringing upon them the
anger of the French monarch. But nothing can appear suffi-
ciently important in our eyes to turn us from a duty, which
is more than ever indispensable."
It appears that Viret, during these troubles, had undertaken
a journey, the means for which had been provided by Geneva.
In the following year Calvin encouraged Farel and Viret to
travel to Worms, to make exertions in behalf of the sufferers in
France : — " It is your business to fulfil my promise, even though
it might be given improvidently. This circumstance itself will
afford you help, you not being the originators of the affair."
His whole life, in fact, was marked by the most diligent endea-
vours to suppress, by the interference of Germany and Switzer-
land, which had then a certain degree of political importance,
the persecutions in France.
A.D. 1544-45.] CHURCH AT MEAUX. 5
We learn from a letter addressed to Calvin by Myconius*,
some of the darkest features of that afflicting season. The
writer thanks him for his letter to Charles V., and says of the
emperor : — " He is now persecuting the saints in Belgium.
Queen Mary, the emperor's sister, has not been able to defend
even her own chaplain. This is the case in numberless other
instances, and the emperor hopes by these means to obtain his
reconciliation with the offended pope. Why does he not much
rather endeavour to procure peace with God, whose hand lies
now so heavy upon him, weighing him down with grievous
sicknesses ? I hear from the council that it is suspended. The
diet is not proceeding. Up to the present time the bishop of
Augsburg, lately made a cardinal, is the only prelate at Worms,
and he has been playing a game, which is quite the mode in little
cities, and has not wholly gone out of fashion even in Rome.
Men in masks force themselves into the houses of the citizens,
eat, drink, play, dance, and commit all sorts of follies and de-
baucheries, which may seem gay and jovial enough, but greatly
scandalize the masters of families, though there are none, as I
hear, who dare venture to oppose them. This is a worthy pre-
paration, as well for the diet as for the synod! O let us pray
that God may arise to uphold his cause and declare his righte-
ousness ! The offences of the great continually increase, so
that the day of God's wrath seems nearer than men believe.
The Lord grant that we may meet Him with joy."
But what was most important for Calvin and Geneva at this
period, was the deep impression which evangelical truth was
then making in France. This is, we lament to say, one of the
most unnoticed portions of church history, which only delights
in repeating the great events of an age, instead of exhibiting for
admiration the work of the Holy Ghost on the souls which
shone like stars in this night of gloom. The history of the
martyrs in France has been till now almost totally neglected.
The following scenes afford a fitting contrast to the levity of
which Myconius speaks, and to the vanities of the council. The
year 1546, so pregnant with events, produced a fearful perse-
cution of the church of Meaux. It had been already once di-
spersed in the year 1523 ; but the seed of the divine Word soon
after took still deeper root there, so that the Lutherans of
Meaux were spoken of proverbially in France. They formed a
complete church, according to the model of that which Calvin
* March 1545. Ep. 61.
6 CHURCH AT MEAUX. [CHAP. X.
had established at Strasburg. Having fasted and prayed, they
chose for their minister Pierre Leclerc, a wool-comber by trade,
but who was deeply versed in the holy Scriptures. His preach-
ing was so blessed, that in a short time between 300 and 400 be-
lievers assembled to hear him. On the 3rd of September 1546,
St. Mary's day, sixty persons were taken prisoners in the house
where he preached, and who, far from attempting to defend
themselves, submitted quietly to be bound, praising God for the
honour. The Lutherans who were outside immediately joined
them in singing the seventy-ninth psalm. Those who were seized
(nineteen women and forty-one men) had been selected from
the rest, because at the time they were celebrating the Lord's
Supper. Having been thrust into wagons, prepared for the
purpose, they were conveyed in the most unmerciful manner to
Paris. Several of them arrived with broken limbs, but this did
not protect them against the infliction of the rack. Fourteen,
whose names have been preserved in the history of the church,
were condemned to unusual tortures, and afterwards to be pub-
licly burnt. The house in which they had been accustomed to
assemble was pulled to the ground, and a chapel built on the
spot, in which every Sunday mass was to be performed. All
the expenses attending this were furnished by the confiscated
property of the sufferers.
Some of the prisoners had been placed in a monastery, that
an attempt might be made to convert them. As this experi-
ment did not succeed, they were sent back to Meaux, attended
by two Sorbonnists, who continued to press their conversion
while seeking their blood. The sentence of death pronounced
upon them was executed October *j, in the place before their
meeting-house, and in the following manner. The tongue of
one of them being torn out, he was still heard to murmur, " The
name of God be praised." The several martyrs were then
dragged up, that they might be burnt at the fourteen stakes,
placed in a circle. Owing to this position of the stakes, they were
able to see and encourage each other. This they did; praising
God with a loud voice to their last breath, although their words
were often interrupted by the priests, who shouted forth like
madmen their hymns, " O salutaris hostia," and " Salve Regi-
na.*' On the following day, in order to complete the triumph,
the catholic priest proceeded under a golden canopy to the spot,
where the tire was still burning, and preached to the people.
Among other things, he said, that " it was necessary for the sal-
A.D. 1544-45.] PERSECUTION IN FRANCE. 7
vation of souls to believe that the fourteen heretics were now in
hell ; that if an angel from heaven should say otherwise, he must
be rejected ; and that God would no longer be God if He did
not eternally damn them." This seemed incredible even to the
catholics themselves, who had known the pure and simple con-
versation of the martyrs ; and instead of the seed of the Gospel
being destroyed by this rage and cruelty, other churches, as
Beza relates, were built of the stones of the ruined temple, and
there is even to the present day a reformed community at
Meaux; that city, in which, at a later period, under Louis
XIV., the zealous Bossuet reposed. Calvin said to Farel (1546),
ci The parliament of Paris continues, I hear, a fiery war with
Christ. Certain it is, that a vast number of believers, far and
wide, are lying in bonds. Sardanapalus in the meanwhile is
dreaming of victory in the midst of his courtesans. May the
Lord look down upon his church ! "
The new life was now beginning to diffuse itself abroad, when
Francis I., oppressed by political cares and terrors, died at Ram-
bouillet in 1547. He has been dignified by some with the title
of Great, but Beza says, — " This surname had been much more
to his praise, if it could have been truly said of him, that he was
as great a warrior and patron of letters as he was a determined
adversary to the interests of religion." His only son, Henry II.,
an enemy to the Gospel and a weak prince, easily allowed him-
self to be deceived, and became a cruel persecutor. His whole
reign exhibits a succession of crimes, and his untimely death
was regarded in France as a divine judgement*.
A multitude of exiles, driven from their homes by the perse-
cution, flocked out of various lands, but especially from France,
to Geneva. Humanity, religious fellowship, and love for his
countrymen, induced Calvin to make the most strenuous exer-
tions to gather them together in that city, and to obtain their
support in the establishment of his principles. A great number
of letters, in his own handwriting, may be appealed to as show-
ing how anxiously he advised them to leave their country.
Many respectable families however had not the resolution to
follow his advice. The storm of persecution had led them to
adopt the erroneous notion, that they might serve God in
secret, while outwardly they appeared to adhere to the old
errors. But the reformer was of too resolute a mind to yield in a
* Calvin refers to this subject in a letter to Farel (MS. Gen.), July 19,
1549, and in one to Bullinger, August 15, 1549 (MS. Tig.).
8 CALVIN AGAINST THE N1C0DEMITES. [CHAP. X.
matter like this. The sincerity of his profession would not allow
a violation of truth, and the duty of making a good confession
of his faith, and of annihilating every temptation to hypocrisy,
induced him to write at this period his two useful little works
against the Nicodemites.
Calvin's ideas, as expressed in these essays, are regarded as
too violent, and he has been accused of speaking with severity
in a case in which he himself was free from danger. The wri-
tings referred to are now chiefly valuable in an historical point
of view, but at the time when they were produced they had a
real practical worth, being well-calculated to strengthen timid
minds against the terrors of martyrdom, and thus to do good,
not only in France, but also in Switzerland and Germany. In
these moments of approaching danger, when Luther was already
advanced in life, Calvin, his junior, laboured with determined
energy. We can now form no conception of the heroism of
that Waldensian in Calabria, who, being allowed to choose be-
tween kissing the cross and being thrown headlong from a lofty
tower, immediately preferred the latter. But the triumph of
evangelical truth then depended upon this devoted courage.
Hypocrisy, at such a time, would have bowTed the church to the
dust. " Dissimulation/' says Calvin, " makes a man an offender
against himself, by hiding what is in his own heart. Hypocrisy
however is still worse, for it consists in the endeavour to give
us that in appearance of wThich we are destitute in reality. God
is not satisfied with the heart. When Peter assails the vice of
unclcanness, he says, e Are ye not the members of Christ? ' &c."
He next examines all the various ceremonies of the catholic
church, and shows how we defile ourselves, as protestants, when
we take any part in their performance. I will here quote only
what he says respecting the funeral service, the Calvinistic sim-
plicity having now almost totally disappeared. " We who have
embraced the pure doctrine of the Gospel, all know well enough
that the services for the dead, and funeral solemnities generally,
arc abominations, for they are founded in falsehood, are con-
trary to Scripture, and do dishonour to the meritorious suffer-
ings and death of our Lord Jesus Christ." Calvin means by
I In-, that Christ having died for souls, it is unlawful to pray for
their deliverance from purgatory, for the dead must either have
believed or not, and this alone will have determined their fate.
He speaks even still more severely against any apparent con-
formity to the catholic worship, and confutes the argument
A.D. 1544-45.] APOLOGY TO THE NICODEMITES. 9
brought from the example of Naaman, permitted by the pro-
phet Elisha to enter the heathen temple, and bow himself, with
the king. The instance of St. Paul, who retained some Jewish
customs*, is explained in a similar manner; and he presses
upon his readers the sublime example of the martyrdom of the
seven brothers, in the time of the Maccabees. But having thus
condemned a carnal caution, he pleads with mildness for the
weak : — " I protest before God, that, so far am I from lightly
blaming my poor brethren who are in such bonds, I would far
rather, out of mere pity and mercy, find arguments by which to
excuse them. After all I have said on the subject, I sigh over
them, and pray God to comfort them. It is far from me to con-
demn them. God knows that the opinion which I entertain of
many in France is, that they are holier in life, and more perfect
than I am. I acknowledge, that it is a greater virtue in them to
walk in the fear of God, in the midst of such an abyss, than it
is for me, who have not so many trials to endure ; and that if
they fall, I ought to regard it as more deserving of excuse_, than
would be the case were I to fall. So far also am I from not con-
sidering them as brothers, that I praise them in all other respects
before God and man, and hold them as more deserving than
myself to have a place in the church." In conclusion, he im-
parts noble counsel and consolation to the weak. So much love
and tenderness is expressed in this address, that none of his
writings are better calculated to confute the accusation which
has been brought against him of hardness or want of feeling.
The following little work, 6 His Apology to the Nicodemites/
is written in a stronger tone : this was because he had learnt
that people were not satisfied with the former. He here cha-
racterises, with considerable humour, the various classes of Ni-
codemites existing in those times : first were those who im-
perfectly explained the Gospel, according to human taste ; and
next those wrho were glad to seize upon the Gospel as a means
of making themselves agreeable in the sight of the ladies, and
furnishing amusing topics for conversation ; the only draw-
back to this being, that it would not allow them to live after
their own taste.
In the same line with the persons last-mentioned, were the
court favourites and the ladies, who had no other wish but that
homage should be paid them ; and hence it was not to be won-
* Actsxviii. 18-24.
10 calvin's defence. [chap. x.
dered at if all such were against him, their common watchword
being, " Do not speak to us of Calvin — he is a monster."
There were also the Nicodemites, who understood Christianity
philosophically, and the merchants, and other little people, who
were happy enough in their homes, and did not wish to be disturb-
ed by the Gospel. He continues with great earnestness : — " If the
believers in the primitive church had acted thus, where now
would the church have been ? The whole theology of the old
martyrs consisted in the knowledge of one God, whom we are
bound to worship, and in whom alone we must place our trust ;
and in that of Jesus Christ, beside whom there is no Saviour.
Nor had they any such lofty acquaintance with these things,
that they would have been able to deduce them, in order, from
each other. They held them in all simplicity, but they rushed
with rejoicing hearts into the fire to bear testimony to the truth
of these doctrines. Nay, even the women readily committed
their children to the flames. We, on the other hand, — we, who
are such great doctors, scarcely know what is meant by bearing
witness to the truth."
This is followed by a defence of his own conduct. He had
been accused of giving people advice at a distance, when it
would have been better for him to have furnished them with an
example in his own person. This was, in fact, a very delicate
point. " If Calvin be so very brave," it was said, " why does
he not come here, that we may see how he would conduct him-
self?"
He expresses his indignant feeling against the people who
thus vilified him, in a very characteristic passage : — " Because
they cannot endure that any one should expose their leprosy,
they have recourse to the wretched subterfuge of saying, that
their inward affection is towards God; this is as much as to
say, that they make a division between God and the devil, and
give their soul to the one and their body to the other. Will
they however satisfy, in this manner, Him who says, ( To him
all knees shall bow/ &c. ? It is a miserable, unhappy attempt at
escape, to make ourselves blind in order not to see our misfor-
tune. I know not with whom we can better compare them
than with some cleaner of sewers, who, having been so long em-
ployed in the filth that he has lost all sense of the horrible
odour, ridicules those who hold their noses at the stench. And
to carry out the comparison : as the scavenger arms himself by
a.d. 1544-45.] calvin's letter to lutiier. 11
strong salves and onions against the poisonous effluvia, and re-
sists one evil smell by another, so these people, that they may
not suffer through the odour of their idolatry, fill themselves
with wicked excuses, like stinking spices, in such a manner
that they may hinder any other impression.*' This species of
irony will be considered as the more pointed, when it is recol-
lected, that it was intended for the multitude in Paris, and for
the court, debased by a miserable habit of flattery.
Melancthon, Martin Bucer, and Peter Martyr, also gave their
opinion on the same question : they all agreed with Calvin. The
latter has further expressed his sentiments on the subject in
two letters, written in 1546; and in four sermons preached in
1552. An epistle was addressed to Calvin by the Zurichers in
1549, and from this we learn that the matter had been long
under their consideration. Even from France Calvin received
communications, calling upon him to obtain Luther's counsel
on the subject.
The letter which Calvin wrote to Luther, in conformity with
this desire, is interesting as the only one which he addressed to
the German reformer. His great reverence for him is clearly
shown by this document. He proceeded very cautiously while
speaking with the venerable father of the church, who died the
next year ; and he felt while approaching him almost as a
young beginner, scarcely supposing that, in the following cen-
tury, the common consent of mankind would place him by his
side. Zwingli would not have written such a letter to Luther*.
" My honoured father If— Being assured that many of my fel-
low-countrymen in France, having turned from the darkness of
popery to the pure light of the Gospel, have, notwithstanding,
been backward to change their open profession, and therefore
continue to pollute themselves with the horrors of popery, as if
they had no knowledge of pure doctrine, — being informed of
this, I could not refrain from assailing such sloth and indiffer-
ence with the severity which I think they deserve. For what
kind of faith is that which remains buried in the recesses of the
soul, and never declares itself by an open confession ? What
* MS. Tig.
f Another letter written by Calvin at this time, to some unknown person,
expresses his feelings respecting the difficulty of the present design (Ep. 392,
Ed. Amst. p. 235). He mentions his own narrow circumstances, the diffi-
culty of meeting the calls upon him even in good times, and the expense at-
tending borrowing money of the merchants or others. It was not the best
time, he added, to ask counsel of Luther, whose mind was but just beginning
to enjoy repose after his long struggle.
12 CALVIN'S LETTER TO LUTHER. [CHAP, X.
kind of witness is that which shrinks concealed behind a hypo-
critical respect for catholic idolatry ? But I will not here dis-
cuss this matter, of which I have treated in two little writings,
from which you may easily learn, if you be pleased to look over
them, what my opinion is, and upon what grounds it rests.
Some of our brethren, aroused by reading these papers, have
awaked from the slumber in which they wrere sunk, and begun
to consider what it is their duty to do. But since it is a hard
thing either to exercise such self-denial as to expose one's life
to danger, or to bring upon ourselves the hatred of the whole
world, through opposition to its customs and opinions, and to
suffer the loss of country and property by a voluntary exile, so
it is that many have found themselves unable to persevere in
their resolution. They suggest however other excuses for their
conduct, and it is plain that they are only anxious to find a pre-
text for yielding. While they thus vacillate to and fro, they
seem desirous of learning your opinion, which, honouring it as
they ought to do, will have great weight with them. They have
therefore entreated me to despatch a trusty messenger to inquire
your sentiments on the subject. This I have been unwilling to
refuse, assured as I am that it is of importance to their best
interests to find themselves supported by your judgement, and
delivered from their present state of uncertainty ; and still fur-
ther, feeling as I do that the same help will be of great use to
myself.
" I therefore beseech you by Christ, my very honoured father
in the Lord, out of regard for them and for me, to endure the
trouble of reading, in the first place, this letter which is written
to you in their name, and my own two little books. This you
may do for pass-time, in your leisure hours, or may commission
some one to do it for you, and then make you acquainted with
the principal points. In the second place, I would beg you
to state to us, in few words, your opinion on the subject. It is
against my will that I thus disturb you, occupied as you are
with so many important and such various affairs ; but I am
convinced that, according to your wonted kindness, you will
pardon me, while I only yield to necessity in laying before you
this request. Would to God that I could hasten to you, were
it to enjoy but a few hours of your conversation! Much should
I prefer it, and far more useful would it be to speak with you
personally, not only on this, but on many other affairs. I hope,
however, that that which is not allowed us on earth, will soon be
a.d. 1544-45.] melanctiign's letter to calvin. 13
granted us in the kingdom of heaven. Farewell, very renowned
man^ and faithful servant of Jesus Christ, and my, at all times,
revered father ! May the Lord continue to guide you by his
Spirit to the end, for the common good of his church." — Jan. 20,
1545.
Calvin sent with his letter to Luther another to Melancthon*,
and it is easy to see that he feared the latter might accuse him
of too great severity in his second book against the Nicodemites.
This letter is also remarkable as exhibiting Calvin's diligent
endeavour to establish a union of opinion with Melancthon,
probably in reference to the last statement of the latter on elec-
tion. On the doctrine of the Lord's Supper they had already
long agreed,
Melancthon's answer, which has, perhaps, never been printed
till now, affords a striking view of his position at that period.
We see how he stood in respect to Luther, seeking peace and
finding none ; what he thought of his life, how oppressed he
felt, and yet full of hope. Much is contained in few words.
He had not the courage to lay Calvin's letter before Luther, but
he sent Calvin his opinion, as found in the works of the Gene-
vese reformer : —
" To the very renowned doctor John Calvin, distinguished by
learning and virtue, minister of the church at Geneva, his pious
and true and very dear friend, Melancthon, sends greeting.
Thankful should I be, my beloved Calvin, to receive from you,
on my own account, some good advice. The strife from which
at an earlier period I escaped, is now increasing here. Having
ever considered that one must strive to uphold the peace of
the church in these wild and terrible lands, and having always
expressed myself accordingly in the most temperate language,
something more difficult is now demanded of me. Therefore I
beseech you to commend me to God in your pious prayers. I
have not given your letter to doctor Martin : he looks at things
with suspicion, and docs not like to have his sentiments on such
questions as you ask, published abroad. I have answered them
as well as I could, and do not set my judgement higher than
your own, or that of other pious men. It is a satisfaction for me
to know that I have lived without seeking to indulge in theolo-
gical disputes, but that I have laboured, not unprofitably, to
disentangle and explain many difficult subjects. Notwithstand-
ing this, I now expect banishment and other sorrows. Fare-
* Ep. GO. ed. Amst. p. 31.
14 LUTHER AND THE SWISS. [CHAP. X.
well.— The day when, 3846 years ago, Noah entered the ark,
and God intended to show us, by his example, that He would
never forsake his church, however it might be tossed about on
the stormy waves of the world*."
Luther's angry feeling, as alluded to in the above letter, was
connected with the dispute between him and the reformers of
Zurich. This will lead us to speak of the part taken by Calvin
in the sacramentarian controversy, and of the earnest endeavour
which he made to restore peace. We must first look back to
the origin of those unhappy circumstances which occasioned the
long and distressing schism f.
The Swiss had adopted in 1538 the Wittenberg confession,
and although even in the time of peace opinions were not altered,
people were thoroughly weary of dispute. This was especially
proved by the cold silence preserved, when Luther, a few years
before his death, began to renew the controversy, and, left by his
friends, remained alone in the arena. He had already, in 1543,
written to Froschauer, saying, that neither he nor any church
of Christ could have communion with the Swiss. Melancthon
sought in vain to tranquillize him. In 1544 Luther published
new libels, pouring forth his gall in his 'Annotations on Genesis/
and setting forth his last confession on the subject of the Lord's
Supper, in which Zwingli and CEcolarnpadius, with their fol-
lowers, were called heretics and reprobates. The cause of his
wrath, according to Hospinian, who follows Pezel, may be traced
to Zwingli's latest production, his f Exposition of the Christian
Faith,' edited and published by Bullinger in 1536 J. This work
seemed to Luther so contrary to its author's statement at Mar-
burg, that he was convinced that Zwingli must have acted to-
wards them with false heart and mouth. Other reasons for his
anger have been found in the injurious reports, that he was no
longer esteemed at Zurich ; and in the circumstance that a new
German translation of the Bible, undertaken by Leo Juda and
other reformers, was published in 1543; while, on the other
hand, Schwenkfeld accused him of a secret understanding with
the Helvetian church, because he had suffered the elevation of
the bread to be discontinued. So again, Amsdorf and others in
Wittenberg occasioned him much vexation ; Melancthon him-
self not concealing his favourable feelings towards the Swiss.
* Melancthon's opinion is added to Calvin's Kxcus. ad Nicodemitas.
f Schriickh, Reformationsgeschichte, t. i. p. 3G3-420.
X Hess. Leben Bullingers, t. i. p. 432.
A.D. 1544-45.] LUTHER AND THE SWISS. 15
Now, while the traces of advancing age were beginning to ap-
pear, he allowed the following words to escape him : — " Let
Zwingli not only speak as he will against the sacraments, but
let him be a heathen altogether, and place the impious pagans
side by side with Christ in the kingdom of heaven. But where
then were Christianity and the sacraments ? Therefore is all
hope gone ; nor ought any more prayers to be offered up for those
who are soul-consumers and murderers." At the same time it is
evident from all this, that the sentiments which may be ascribed
to his own personal feelings ought not to be regarded as possess-
ing a dogmatic value, or as justifying the separation of his
church from the reformed.
Melancthon, deeply afflicted at this breach, wrote to Bullin-
ger, — " That he would receive a letter from Luther, according
to which all hope of reconciliation must be given up ; that he
himself would retreat quietly into his own soul, and there en-
deavour to find that freedom of conscience which he could not
enjoy under the guardianship of Luther."
The Swiss, though warned on many sides, replied, by Bullin«
ger, in a German and Latin writing, entitled, w A genuine state-
ment of the servants of the church at Zurich, as to what they
teach ; especially concerning the Lord's Supper, in answer to
the slanders, condemnation and jests of Doctor Martin Luther."
People were far from satisfied with this production. Calvin
said in a letter to Melancthon, " One must write better, or not
at all: the work is meagre and puerile*."
Luther refrained from saying anything publicly in answer to
this last attack of the Swiss; but he continued to the end hos-
tile to the Zwinglians. After his death, his letter to the provost
Jacob, dated January 17? 1546, became commonly known, and
in this he says, (( Blessed is the man who hath not walked in
the counsel of the Sacramentarians ; nor stood in the way of the
Zwinglians ; nor sat in the seat of the Zurichers." He also
alludes to the controversy in his work against the theologians of
Louvain.
Many of Calvin's writings show how, mindful of his high call-
ing, he sought at this time to quiet men's minds, while he saw
with a prophetic glance the approaching schism f. Thus in a
* Hess. Leben Bullingcrs, t. i. p. 455. Ep. 63. cd. Amst. p. 33.
t He expressed his feelings on this subject in a letter to Farel, dated Octo-
ber 10, 1544, MS. Gen. — "We must now, before all things, pray to the
Lord, who alone can avert this evil, which will soon blaze forth like a burning
brand. We may now look for the end."
16 CALVIN TO BULL1XGER. [CHAP. X.
letter to Bullinger, dated November 25, 1544, he adjured him
to treat the great man, meaning Luther, with respect : — " I
hear," he says, " that Luther assails not only you, but all of us,
with horrible abuse. Now I can scarcely ask you to be silent,
since it is not right to allow ourselves to be so undeservedly
abused, without attempting some defence. It is difficult more-
over to believe that such forbearance could do any good. I wish
however that the following may be clearly understood :— in the
first place, how great a man Luther is ; by what extraordinary
gifts he is distinguished; and with what energy of soul, with
what perseverance, with what ability and success he has con-
tinued up to the present day to overthrow the kingdom of anti-
christ, and to extend at the same time the doctrine of salvation.
I have already often said, that were he to call me a devil, I
should still continue to venerate him as a chosen servant of God,
uniting with extraordinary virtues some great failings. Would
to heaven that he had striven more to subdue those tempests of
feeling which he has so continually allowed to break forth !
Would that he had only employed that violence, so natural to
him, against the enemies of the truth, and not against, the ser-
vants of God ! Would that he had exercised more care to dis-
cover his own defects ! Unhappily there was too great a crowd
of flatterers about him, who added still more to the self-confi-
dence peculiar to his nature. It is even our duty to view his
failings in such a light, that we may the more properly estimate
his extraordinary gifts. I beg you therefore to bear in mind,
that we have to do with one of the first servants of Christ ; with
one to whom we all owe much. I would also have you consider,
that you could not possibly gain any advantage by entering into
a struggle with him. You would only, by such a course, afford
pleasure to the enemy, who would delight not so much in our
defeat as in that of the Gospel. People will everywhere will-
ingly believe what is said, when we vilify and condemn each
other. You must consider this, rather than what Luther may
have deserved on account of his violence; lest that should hap-
pen to us of which Paul speaks, namely, that while we bite and
devour one another, all may go to the ground. Nay, even should
he challenge us to the contest, wc must rather turn away than
hazard by our twofold fall the injury of the church."
Calvin also comforted Melancthon, who, in the latter years
of Luther's life, found himself in a very painful position. Not
agreeing with Luther on the subject of the spiritual presence of
a.d. 1544-5.] calvin's opinion of luther. 17
Christ in the Lord's Supper, he had entered fully into Calvin's
purer views.
The statements of the latter on Luther's great power and in-
fluence are also worthy of remark, in connection with the ques-
tion of discipline*. Shortly before his last journey to Eisleben
Luther spoke to Melancthon in a conciliatory tone. This state-
ment is made by Haller, provost of Zurich, in his continuation
of the Bullinger Chronicle, but without reference to his autho-
rity.
Luther, weary of life and conflict, left the arena at4 the mo-
ment when the approach of a storm was evident. Calvin was
then thirty-six years of age, armed for the strife and not fearing
it. It is interesting at the present day, when the churches are
united, and after we have been so long accustomed to think only
of Luther at Wittenberg, to meditate by his grave on Calvin
also, and on the united consequences of their labours. The
relation existing between these two witnesses of the Lord is
seen in the common and the general; what was opposite in
them consisted in their appearance ; the work of each had its
own proper limits ; the twofold spirit was still the same, and is
one to us : more of living energy was given on this side, more
depth of thought on the other. The one sought to clear Catho-
licism of what was antichristian ; the other went further, pene-
trated critically into the Gospel, rejected what did not closely
agree with it, and completed the reformation. We may con-
clude from the contrast in their habits of thought, and accus-
tomed as they were to execute their will with determined reso-
lution, that they could not easily have lived near each other.
But as John, Paul and James treated of the same truth, only
from various points of view, so did Luther and Calvin believe
altogether but the same. Hence, though they never saw each
other, they never felt as strangers, but entertained a mutual
respect, while each expressed his belief according to his par-
ticular character. These men, with some few others, were the
greatest of their kind, and humanity owes to them its highest
blessings. With the heroism of self-devotion, and continuing
the conflict which they began, in the name of God, to their latest
breath, they persevered, whatever their individual imperfections,
in proclaiming the great truth, that one only is holy, that is
the Lord. It is right that Luther's grave should be left with-
out any inscription. All words would have been tame ; just as
* Epis. lxiii. Ed. Arast. p. 33, of the year 1545.
VOL. II. C
18 ZWIXGLI'S OPINION OF LUTHER. [CHAP. X.
it would have been impossible to find a fitting inscription for
the tombs of the apostles. While however the entire people of
Germany thus honour him by their silence, the words of the
other evangelical party are not to be passed over, and might
well adorn his chamber in the Augustine monastery.
Calvin says of him :— " We sincerely testify that we regard
him as a noble apostle of Christ, by whose labour and ministry
the purity of the Gospel has been restored in our times *J*
Again : — " If any one will carefully consider what was the state
of things at the period when Luther arose, he will see that he
had to contend with almost all the difficulties which were en-
countered by the apostles. In one respect indeed his condi-
tion was worse and harder than theirs. There was no kingdom,
no principality, against which they had to declare war ; whereas
Luther could not go forth, except by the ruin and destruction
of that empire, which was not only the most powerful of all,
but regarded all the rest as obnoxious to itself f" Similar
sentiments are expressed, we have seen, in the epistle already
quoted.
But if we desire to adduce the most honourable testimony to
Luther, it is that which the noble, virtuous Zwingli delivers
respecting him J. " Luther," he says, " is in my opinion an ad-
mirable soldier of God. He has examined Scripture with as
great earnestness as any one has done within the last thousand
years. I consider it as deserving not the slightest attention, if
the papists should abuse both him and me as heretics. No one
can be compared to him for the manly, unflinching courage with
which he has assailed the pope of Rome. As long as the papacy
has endured, all others have been blameless. What the eternal,
unchangeable Word of God contains, that he bears richly forth,
and shows the heavenly treasure to poor, wandering Christians,
neither caring for what the enemies of God may do against it,
nor trembling at their fierce looks or threats. I have designedly
read him but little ; but what I have read, insofar as it respects
the doctrines, meaning and sense of Scripture, is commonly so
Well considered and grounded, that it is not possible that any one
should mistake it. He yields in some things too much to the
weak and foolish, and in this I do not agree with him. But
Luther preaches Christ. He does it as I do it, although, God
be praised, a countless world of people have been converted by
• T. viii. J). 123. f T. Viih p. 119-
Niischeler'fl Lcbensgeschichte Zwingli's, p. 159.
A.D. 1547.] THE GERMAN WAR. 19
him more than by me and others, whose limits, however, whether
great or small, are divinely appointed*/5
CHAPTER XL
THE GERMAN WAR. LEAGUE OF SMALCALDE. DEFEAT OF
THE PROTESTANTS. CALVIN WRITES AGAINST THE INTE-
RIM.— THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND. CALVIN's LITERARY
LABOURS.
Two other combatants left the arena soon after Luther ; that is,
Francis I. and Henry VIII. of England. The circumstances of
society had received on all sides an extraordinary impulse, as if
the spirit of the world were challenging the spirit of God to the
fight, for the purpose of deciding their quarrel in open conflict.
Whilst the council of Trent was treating things useless and
trifling as important, and things most important with levity,
still pretending that its object was the peace of the whole church,
Charles had already conceived the notion of suppressing the
league of Smalcalde by force of arms. Already, in 1546, was
the little state of Geneva, lying among the Alps, on the borders
of Germany, France and Italy, greatly agitated. It was ex-
pected that the emperor would pass through Geneva on his way
from Italy. An instant resolution was taken to arm. The
whole of Switzerland offered supplies of troops. Bern alone
was ready with 2000 men. But such was the feeling then ex-
isting in Geneva, that, dreading the loss of its independence, the
citizens rejected the offer; and the little state, with a population
of only 20,000 souls, prepared itself singly for the struggle.
Calvin approved of this, and said in a letter to Farel, — " It is a
wretched condition not to be able to accept defenders without
putting ourselves in bondage to them." The news however was
received that the troops of the emperor had been repulsed. In
the state-protocol of the republic Charles is constantly described
as the enemy of the Gospel.
The protestants had firmly declared their sentiments at Worms
* Bullinger, Zwingli's successor, speaks of Luther's death in a similar
style. Fiislin : Epist. Reformat, p. 238.
c 2
20 THE GERMAN WAR. [CHAP. XI.
in opposition to the will of the emperor, had refused to furnish
help against the Turks, and were preparing themselves for war.
The year 1547, the most eventful, and, at the same time, the sad-
dest year in the whole century, was now at hand. Beza, in his
account of Calvin, thus expressed at a later period the pain
which he felt : — " That great edifice of the German reformation,
raised with so much toil, now seemed ready to perish, and they
were accounted happy who had been suddenly snatched away
by death/' He bears witness to Calvin's having at this time
exhibited all the greatness and elevation of his character : — " How
must he have suffered, he who, even in times of peace, bore in
his heart the remotest even of the churches, and participated in
the cares of all, as if their burdens rested upon him alone ! How
must his pious soul have been tortured through the misery of
so many ! He beheld at this moment his most intimate friends,
Melancthon, Bucer, Peter Martyr, involved in the greatest
danger, and nearer death than life. But his writings and letters
of that period prove that he overcame all those storms by the
energy of his noble soul. His opponents in Geneva persecuted
him to the uttermost, but he yielded to them not so much as an
inch."
It is evident indeed that Calvin, who speaks of himself as
naturally timid, exerted the whole force of his spirit at this time,
which may well be regarded as the brightest in his career as a
reformer. He was especially useful to the interests of the
church : the combatants needed a leader, and he was admirably
suited to become the centre-point of their power. His resolu-
tion, his firmness, doubtless contributed greatly to prevent the
courage of the persecuted from sinking. No sooner did all seem
lost in Germany, than people turned their eyes towards Swit-
zerland, which still enjoyed some degree of security under the
shield of its ancient renown.
The league of Smalcalde wras to be destroyed. It was the ob-
ject of the emperor to become absolute, and he intended, as soon
as he had vanquished the protestants, to make himself the
master of both the council and the pope. But both he and the
pope were deceived in their reckoning, and the conquered be-
came the conquerors. The league of Smalcalde might certainly
have established itself by force of arms, had not John Frederic,
firm and constant in the spiritual struggle, but unfitted for out-
ward action^ been chosen for its leader. The emperor, secretly
united with Maurice of Saxony, very cautiously declared that
A.D. 1547.] THE GERMAN WAR. 21
he would not attack doctrine. Union was wanting among the
protestants, and a council of war determined that the whole
should be summoned to Ulm. Schartel unfortunately was no
longer at their head ; and when Maurice advanced upon Saxony,
and sequestered it in the name of the emperor, the elector hast-
ened back from the south of Germany to repossess himself of
his dominions. Augsburg fell first, and all the others, with the
exception of Magdeburg and Bremen, which remained invincibly
faithful, opened their gates to the emperor. The hardest con-
ditions were accepted ; so that even the king of France found
it wise to raise the spirits of the protestants again by promises,
and once more to excite the Turks and the pope against the
conqueror.
Calvin however had not lost his courage, and hoped much
from the Germans. In a letter to the Sr. de Bourgogne, Feb.
25, 1547> he says, " I hope that our Antiochus (Charles V.),
wdio now oppresses us, will be chained so tightly that he will
not remember the marks on his feet and hands, for he will have
them over his whole body. May God grant the same in respect
to his companion, Sardanapalus (the king of France), for they
both deserve one and the same measure." But after the battle
of Muhlberg he writes, " If God will chastise us so severely as
to give the reins to this tyrant, who meditates nothing but de-
struction, the lesson for us to learn is, to be prepared to suffer.
He who has taken us for his servants is the ruler in the midst
of enemies. It becomes us therefore to have patience, and to
comfort ourselves with the hope that he will at length bring his
enemies to shame. But I trust that He will bear our weakness,
convert these distresses to a good end, and bridle the violence of
those who triumph before their time, and even against God
himself."
A proof was now given of the truth of that which the land-
grave Philip said to Bucer, — " It is not the will of God to up-
hold the interests of the Gospel by the sword, or by force, but
by preaching, by knowledge, by suffering, by death and the
cross," — words which clearly indicate the secret cause of the
apparent want of activit}' in the protestants, but which was ac-
counted for their honour. They acted not, because they were
convinced that God must contend for his Gospel. Luther even
had long hesitated on this subject, and had at last only slowly
decided that self-defence was lawful, which in reality gave a
false direction to the entire power of protestantism.
22 THE GERMAN WAR. [CHAP. XI.
On the 24th of April the emperor attacked the elector John
at Muhlberg. The latter was attending a sermon at the time,
and would not allow himself to be disturbed. He fled when it
was too late. Alba pursued him with his cavalry, and took him
prisoner without a struggle. The emperor allowed sentence of
death to be passed upon him. John renounced his electoral
dignity, but declared that he was not subject to the council of
Trent. Soon after this, Philip of Hesse, during an entertain-
ment given him by Alba, was treacherously made prisoner, and
in the presence of the elector of Brandenburg, who had agreed
to be surety for his safety. Granvella and Charles answered
disdainfully all representations made to them on the subject.
The latter led John Frederic and Philip about with him in tri-
umph, and trampled all Germany in the dust.
Calvin expressed himself well on these unhappy occurrences,
and employs the same sentiments as the landgrave Philip.
"We have news from Germany (July 14, 1547) j affairs are at
present in such a state that I know our Lord will take from us
the victorious Gospel, in order to compel us to fight under his
cross. But He consoles us by the reflection that He intends
to uphold his church by the wonderful exercise of his power,
and not by the hand of man. The trial, I acknowledge, is
severe ; but our forefathers have experienced it as well as we,
and they remained constant and unshamed. We may now
prove the truth of the proverb, e Let us hope, and then we shall
see.' For the rest, we must not be surprised if God proves to
us by so hard a method that there is an eternal life. But may
those who have not yet been shaken, contemplate themselves in
the mirror of these examples, and so be prepared to stand in this
manner before the judge."
After the death of Francis I. and Henry VIII. the emperor
fell himself at the summit of his power. He was master of
Germany, but his thirst for rule was to prove the deliverance of
the church. The diet was opened at Augsburg, and he now
declared openly that he was resolved to establish unity in reli-
gion. But the entire uprooting of protestantism formed no part
of his plan : the evangelical church was to be made a barrier
to the papal power. The pope, on his side, jealous of the pro-
ceedings of the emperor, concluded a treaty with Henry II., and
transferred, under pretence of the plague, the council from Trent
to Bologna, lie thus placed it more under his own immediate
control, (diaries did not conceal his anger at this proceeding :
A.D. 1547.] CALVIN TO BULLIXGER. 23
the Germans could not send their representatives into Italy ; and
when the Synod recommenced its sitting in 1548, he protested
solemnly against its translation. A plan was at the same time
proposed to the Diet of Augsburg for the re-establishment of
religious union, and from this arose the celebrated Interim. But
both parties were brought into a hostile position by the Interim
and the Council. The pope demanded an unconditional sub-
jection to his will : he allowed but the single choice, antichrist
or excommunication. His sole object was to raise the spiritual
power to its greatest height ; while the emperor desired the
union of parties, in order to exalt in a similar degree the autho-
rity of the state.
At the commencement of this unhappy epoch, Calvin entreated
the Geneva council to allow him to visit the Swiss churches,
for the purpose of gaining information as to the state of those in
Germany ; perhaps also to exhort the Swiss themselves to union.
He returned on the 10th of February, 1547, and he concludes
his address to the council, in which he mentions the capture of
Ulrn, with these apostolic words: " Seeing that the devil torments
those who have a zeal for the Gospel, because of our sins and
our forgetfulness of God, let us recommend ourselves to the
Lord."
The danger for Switzerland became every day greater by the
entrance of the Spaniards into Germany, and their possession
of that country. Calvin earnestly exhorted the cantons to rise.
Strasburg and Constance were the bulwarks of their church.
Thus he wrote to Bullinger in September, 1547 : " The people of
Strasburg are alarmed because the emperor intends to spend the
winter among them : they would shut their gates against him, if
they could obtain assistance from other quarters. Let him enter
Strasburg, and he will form a camp, from which he will make
war upon you. Now, dear Bullinger, were there an opportunity
of taking counsel among each other, and you neglected to do so,
would you not be, as it were, holding your throats to the knife ?
But it is useless to speak. I know that your fellow-townsmen
are wise enough to wish for some remedy to these disorders.
Your neighbours, who have no idea of employing means to
bridle the beast, lose their reason. But if they have actually
resolved to perish, the Lord will direct his elect by the spirit of
his good counsel, that in due time they may be delivered from
the clanger. Many are the reasons which ought to make you
shrink with alarm from forming a league with France. But though
24 STATE OF THE CHURCH. [CHAP. XI.
it can be of no possible advantage to you to entangle yourselves
with that country, yet I do not see why you should refuse all
offers of union *."
Calvin's firm, exalted sentiments, in the midst of these
troubles, appeared the still more encouraging. In a letter, dated
July 21, 1547, he warns the faithful in France that the agitation
in Germany could hardly fail to affect them in some degree.
"It is impossible for us, if we once find ourselves established on
this firm foundation of the church, not to be prepared to breast
even the fiercest waves and storms, and to hold out against their
assault. Yea, it is even good for us to be exposed to such
afflictions as may prove our constancy and the firmness of our
faith. In Germany the Lord has so humbled whatever was
great and glorious among our brethren, and has so increased the
power of him from whom nothing but evil is to be expected,
that he seems to be engaged in re-establishing his spiritual king-
dom wherever it before existed. According to human appear-
ance, there is the least possible cause for hope ; but if we do
not cease to commend the unhappy church and the kingdom of
Christ in prayer to the Lord, I still hope that He will, beyond
our expectation, lend his hand to the work. It is to be feared, that
we have hitherto allowed our eyes to be too much dazzled by the
expectation of human help. Now that we have been taught to
depend upon Him alone, we must recall to our minds the truth,
by which He supported the church in former ages, and so do
nothing but what may tend to his glory. Often have we had
occasion to wonder at that which no one before hoped to see.
In the meantime let us continue our warfare as soldiers fighting
under the standard of the cross of Christ. This has already
gained triumphs surpassing all those of the world."
Turning his eyes from the great disorders existing in Geneva,
he says, "It is not worth while to trouble you with these.
Moses and the prophets, the earlier leaders of God's people, had
other troubles to bear, and such trials are altogether necessary
lor us. It is your present duty to seek God by prayer, and to
entreat Him that we may not become weak, but that, if it be
necessary, we may be prepared to give up our lives for his
service, and to regard the rage and threats of the impious as
* In a letter to RullinGrer, dated May 1549, he shows, by examples from
Scripture, thai a league might be formed with the wicked, though it was to be
feared. 'I be Bufferings of the unfortunate brethren in France influenced him,
and he adjured Bullingcr to think of them.
A.D. 1548.] FALL OF STRASBURG. 25
nothing in comparison with the fear of the Lord. God grant
that all tumults may at last be stilled, for they sorely afflict the
souls of the weak, and that to me is of all things the most
distressing."
Strasburg was obliged to sign a capitulation, April 12, 1547,
whereby it agreed to pay 30,000 dollars and surrender twelve
pieces of cannon. Even this however could not long protect the
city. Switzerland suffered still more. The free imperial city of
Constance lost both its spiritual and political liberties. The
emperor took advantage of this event to unite it to the dominions
of Austria. An army of three thousand Spaniards attacked it,
and were repulsed ; but a ban was now pronounced against it,
and it was compelled not only to receive the Interim, but to give
itself up to Ferdinand. Altars and masses were now introduced,
and evangelical ministers were forbidden to reside there. Farel
says, " As the ruin of Sodom is described, so will that of insen-
sate Constance be related. They celebrate the Interim, like
bacchanals, with dancing, gaming and drinking." " You would
be astonished," remarks Bullinger, "if you could see the form of
oath by which Constance has pledged itself to the king. They
have sworn by God and the holy angels to adopt his opinions."
The celebrated Ambrosius Blaarer, and all the evangelical party,
departed with grief from the state, where Huss, a century before,
had suffered for freedom.
Musculus had already fled from Augsburg, and sought refuge
in Switzerland. The council of Zurich, though fearing the
emperor, allowed Bullinger to receive him. He was afterwards
appointed professor at Bern. Calvin wrote thus to Farel, April
30, 1548: e ' I say nothing respecting the fearful destruction
which threatens so many churches : I am too much troubled at
it. Such is the state of things, that no one can be reckoned
among the servants of Christ who is not ready boldly to venture
his head in their defence. If Viret wish it, I will hasten to him
with all speed, that we may all three go together to Zurich."
Mention is soon after made of the meeting of this triumvirate,
to consult for the good of the church. Calvin says : " If our
prayer has any weight with the people of Zurich, they will
prevent, unless I err, the coming evil by a timely interference.
A means will then be found to extend the discussion, till we have
adopted some common measure of safety." To Viret he writes,
June 1548, " Believe me, the eyes of both the wicked and the
good are directed towards you. Each party inquires what kind
2G SWISS EXILES. [chap. XI.
of spirit animates you. By prudent conduct you will preserve
that reputation which is now exposed to such danger, and will
soften the rage of the enemy ."
But the Swiss remained divided and inflexible. Bullinger
speaks only of a bold answer, which they had resolved to give
the emperor, who, strange enough, had shown no willingness to
unite with them. The catastrophe was accomplished at Stras-
bnrg. In 1549 the Interim was fully introduced; those who
would not acknowledge it were to be sent to the galleys. The
teachers fled ; but in the midst of the general apostasy, a feeling
of strength and dignity was again awakened in Germany.
" Many firmly reject the deceitful, double-meaning deforma-
tion." The weaker indeed the resistance when the struggle
was only for territory, so much the bolder it became when it
regarded matters of conscience. Melancthon had disapproved
of the Interim in almost all its particulars : Maurice of Saxony
opposed and protested openly against it : the captive elector
expressed himself in noble language, and still more definitely
against it. A host of writings followed. The landgrave Philip
yielded, but his clergy did not. Frederick II., of the Palatinate,
and Joachim II. adopted it. The margrave of Brandenburg-
Kustrin, on the contrary, and all the principal cities, took the
part of its opponents. At Augsburg Musculus had preached
against it; Osiander also was obliged to flee ; Bucer, Fagius and
Martyr went to England. The Interim was everywhere ridi-
culed, especially at Magdeburg, which distinguished itself by its
determined opposition. The power of the emperor however at
length prevailed ; but the fiercest hatred was awakened, and the
way prepared for new events.
Calvin comforted all those who had been obliged to flee.
Brent his, who hastened to Basil, wrote to the reformer. His
courageous answers are filled with the joyful sentiments of the
Gospel; and in the whole of this period we meet with opinions
and events in France and Germany which recall to mind the first
centuries of Christianity, and exhibit a zeal unknown to our
mild, free age, in which the persecution of opinion is the only
thing visited with anathemas.
It was under the name of the Interim that the emperor, in
1548, published ;i formulary, which was to serve as a rule for
both parties in the ehnreh, till a general council should have
pronounced definitively on the disputed points of belief. All that
the Interim granted to the protcstants was the communion in
A.D. 1548.] THE INTERIM. 27
both kinds, and the marriage of the clergy ; but it was declared
that even this was only conceded for the time. In other respects
the decision was wholly against the Lutherans, and under the
pretence of impartiality questions of the utmost importance
were solved, to the injury of the evangelical cause. Notwith-
standing this however the catholics were as little contented
with the Interim as the protestants. It already existed in the
germ at Ratisbonne, and was wrought out by the politic, but far
from conscientious, theologians, Pflug, Helding and Agricola.
The first two were catholics, but they were honoured on account
of their personal character : the third, Agricola, was a pro-
testant, who, as it was suspected, had been bribed to mislead or
betray his party. The emperor had passed a law which rendered
it a capital offence to write against the Interim. Still, more than
thirty-seven papers appeared against it. Calvin was also called
upon by his friends to controvert it. He wrote to Farel, August
10, 1548 : " Bullinger has exhorted me to write against the
bastard reformation (adult ero-Germanum, as he named the In-
terim). I was already prepared for this, before his letters reached
me, but I had put the work aside. I have asked Bucer's advice :
if he think it right, I will attempt something." In the then
state of things it was a proof of great courage to dare to attack
the dreaded emperor, who might any day fall upon Switzerland.
Bullinger was rejoiced to see his writing, and mentions that
an answer had appeared in Saxony, but that it contained nothing
but abuse, He had himself prepared something, but would not
let it be printed. Calvin, in the paper referred to, again opposed
with minute particularity the Roman Catholic doctrine in all
its details, and shows especially how the church might have
been reformed, and peace established, had the authors of the
Interim really desired to settle the dispute. He proves, on the
other hand, the sophistry of the so-named mediators, according
to all the various catholic principles. " Not the smallest truth,"
he says, " must be lost, unless we mean to be guilty of what is
indisputably a sacrilege." In the part of the work where he
treats of the supremacy of Rome, he asserts, among other things,
that Peter never was in that city. He develops his ideas on
marriage and divorce, opposes the notion that marriage is a
sacrament, and particularly refutes a catholic who had written
against the Interim on the ground that it allowed the marriage
of priests. He concludes with an admirable exhortation to all
28 CHURCH OF ENGLAND. [CHAP. XI.
his evangelical brethren to die, if necessary, for the faith, and
to fix their thoughts on eternal life with God. When Melanc-
thon, at a subsequent period, did not reject the modified Leipzig
Interim, Calvin reproached him in the severest manner, and with
the most passionate love of truth. " Vacillation in so great a
man is not to be tolerated. I would a hundred times rather die
with you, than see you survive a doctrine which you had be-
t raved." Thus he reproved him, but without undervaluing, as
others did, his greatness.
To one of the impressions of this work the printer affixed an
admonition, stating that he did not agree with an opinion con-
tained in the book, which seemed to affirm that the children of
believers are already, before baptism, holy and regenerate, and
that baptism therefore is not unconditionally necessary. Calvin
opposed the attack of the unknown editor in an especial ap-
pendix, which appeared only in 1550.
The distracted state of the church in Germany had occasioned
the flight of many of Calvin's friends to England; and the
learned and christian Peter Martyr became in Cranmer's hand a
chief instrument of the Reformation, which now, notwithstand-
ing great imperfections and abuses, of which Calvin speaks in
many of his writings, and especially in his letter to Somerset,
went more prosperously forward. The earlier measures of the
king, under whom court cabals, passion and the love of women
entered into the conduct of church affairs, had given such a bad
direction to the operations of the clergy, that even the best
teachers could not overcome the difficulties in their way. Hert-
ford, the uncle of the heir apparent, was appointed protector
during the minority of Edward VI., and, as duke of Somerset,
ruled with kingly power, but with justice and moderation. The
disturbed state of the nation as to religious affairs, the variety
of parties, rendered the control of a ruler at this time more
especially necessary. Sincerely devoted to the Reformation, he
looked to Cranmer for the accomplishment of his ends. This
prelate sought not only Bucer and Martyr, but Fagius, Ochinus
and Musculus as his fellow-labourers. The first four only came
t<> England; with them however was associated John a Lasco,
who had been converted to the truth at Zurich by Zwingli. It
was at Bucer'8 suggestion that Calvin undertook to exhort the
duke of Somerset to despise all difficulties in the execution of
his purpose, Somerset seems to have received this advice favour-
A.D. 1551.] BUCER AND MARTYR. 29
ably, Calvin having subsequently said in a letter to Farel,
" Canterbury has told me that I cannot do anything more useful
than to write often to the king/5
" I hear/' he says in his epistle to the protector, u that there
are two classes of agitators in your kingdom, the one consisting
of fanatics, who, under the pretence of zeal for the Gospel, over-
turn all social order; the other of those who obstinately desire
to retain the whole mass of catholic superstitions. Both deserve
to be punished by the sword, which God has given you, for they
rise in defiance against the king and against God. The best
means however to check the evil is to instruct men in the know-
ledge that we are created after the image of God, and that
Christianity is opposed to all disorder. What I have to say to
you therefore may be reduced to three points. First, in what
manner the people may be best taught; second, what means
may be used to remove the abuses of the church; and third,
how the scandals which exist, the vices and luxury of the day,
may be overcome."
He wrote at the same time to Bucer in England, encouraging
him to promote peace and union there ; he also prayed him,
with great freedom of expression, to speak more clearly on the
doctrine of the Lord's Supper, and begged him to have the
honour of the Holy Spirit and of Christ more distinctly before
his eyes, that no part of it might be ascribed to the mere minister,
or the elements of the sacrament. The letter is well worth read-
ing, and affords an excellent view of the subject. " You must
be careful to devote yourself to the church, and to the service of
the Lord. You have already run over a long course, and you
know not how much still remains to you. I, who left the cradle
a little earlier, stand perhaps nearer the goal, but the direction
and the end of our lives are in the hand of the Lord." He then
speaks of the wretched condition of France, and expresses a hope
that England may raise itself up. " I have exhorted the pro-
tector, as you wished me, and as the present state of affairs re-
quires. It is now your duty, in all possible ways, if you can but
obtain a hearing, to press especially for the abolishing of all
ceremonies, which always carry somewhat of superstition with
them." It was Somerset's design only to purify the English
church and the papacy, not to reconstruct them.
Bucer promised, in order to avoid contention, to speak of the
Lord's Supper in the same language as Martyr. In the year
1551 a new strife arose, as to which of the catholic ceremonies
30 CHURCH OF ENGLAND. [CHAP. XI.
should be abolished. Hooper, who, even according to Calvin's
opinion, viewed the subject too strictly, was thrown into prison.
Calvin immediately entreated the duke of Somerset to protect
Hooper, and he was soon after liberated.
Bucer died the same year, and Calvin deplored his death in a
letter to Viret : — " I feel as if my heart would break, whenever I
think of the manifold loss which the church has suffered in
Bucer. May the Lord grant that all the rest whom I might
have to weep may survive me, and so let me die joyfully !" But
he was still very dissatisfied with the state of the church of En-
gland*. "There is yet much to be desired. Among others, it
is an incurable evil, that, so long as the king remains under
guardianship, all the revenues of the church will be squandered
by the great. In the meanwhile, they give a mere pittance to
men without merit, but who perforin the character of pastors. I
will not cease however to rouse the consciences of all on this
subject." He developed a grander plan, in a subsequent letter
to Cranmer, for a general union of the evangelical churches.
The young king Edward, who ascended the throne in his
tenth year, ruled till 1553. His noble dispositions awakened the
greatest hope, and Calvin sought to gain him more and more for
the Gospel. This is strikingly shown by his sending him a copy
of his Commentary on Isaiah. This was followed by a dedica-
tion of the Commentary on the Catholic. Epistles. In the epistle
dedicatory he arms the young prince against the Council of
Trent. Lastly, he dedicated to him the Commentary on the
eighty-seventh Psalm, with a French letter, dated 1552.
Evident progress was made by the Reformation at this period.
The parliament in 1549 appointed a committee of bishops and
clergy to undertake the task of forming a new liturgy. They
retained only so much of the Mass as was consistent with the
principles of the Reformation ; thus the invocation of saints was
abolished, and Latin was exchanged for English. The marriage
of the clergy was allowed. But the evil disposition of Henry
VIII. was still at work; even Cranmer knew not of what spirit
he was, and became the persecutor of those who differed from
his opinions. Bishop Bonner was deprived of his office, because
he supported t\\v old doctrine of the real presence. Even some
mechanics, who adhered to their extravagant notions, were
brought to the scaffold ; and Cranmer pressed it upon the young
king as a duty to order them to be executed. lie yielded, but
* Epis. 123, Ed. Amst. p. 240.
a.d. 1552.] calvin's commentaries. 31
with tears. Violence like this led only to an outward unity, and
not to the truth. Thus an altogether different system became
necessary.
Calvin's influence in Scotland was not exercised till a later
period; but he already took a comprehensive survey of the
churches in foreign lands. In the year 1545 he renewed his
intercourse with the Austrian reformed communities, to which
he dedicated his catechism, with the view of establishing a union
of doctrine between them and his own church. He also ad-
dressed himself to the Poles, and dedicated his Commentary on
the Hebrews, in 1549, to king Sigismund Augustus, whom he
exhorted to give himself to the service of Christ, a which places
us in the rank of angels," and to walk in the footsteps of his
glorious father, Sigismund, who, while persecution raged in so
many other countries, never stained his pure hand with blood.
The great men of his kingdom, he added, were now expressing
their zeal for Christ and the truth ; John a Lasco, a descendant
of a most renowned family, shining conspicuous before the rest.
The Reformation was established in Denmark as early as
1536, but it was not till 1552 that Calvin had any intercourse
with that nation. In that year he dedicated the first half of his
Commentary on the Acts of the Apostles, to the excellent king
Christian I.; and in 1554 he dedicated the second half to the
son of that monarch, Frederic, expressing on both occasions his
high esteem for those princes, and his love towards the Danish
church. His intercourse with Sweden was of a still later date.
Beza says, " He bore all these churches on his shoulders."
It is a characteristic and a joyous sign of the freshness and
overflowing living energy in this great man, that at this busy
period of his career he published so many works, that it might
have been supposed he had nothing else to do. When more-
over we consider their solidity, especially in the case of his
exegetical writings, we feel that he had an internal, especial
existence for himself, as well as his outward being ; or, as he
expresses it, ( all the conflicts which took place around him, and
the consequences of which seemed to oppress him so severely,
were but, in his eyes, as skirmishes*.'
If he was by anything more especially characterized, it was
by the exegetical element, with which he wrought upon the in-
tellectual world. The clearness and sedateness of his under-
standing, the tranquillity, the caution against extravagances, in
* Epis, ad Pios Gallos.
32 calvin's commentaries. [chap. xi.
a word the higher cultivation in contrast with the rudeness of
an earlier period, the simple style, the dogmatic freedom, the
tact, the learning and christian sentiment, the practical character
of his interpretation, — all characteristic of his genius and writings,
have been spoken of in the first part of this work.
It was Bucer who first encouraged him to undertake the
labour of a commentator. " The Lord," he said, "has endowed
you with an excellent ability to interpret his Gospel. You have
again bestowed upon us a noble gift by your commentary on
the Epistles to Timothy. May the spirit of God himself guide
you!"
The first part of his Commentary on the Epistles to the
Corinthians he dedicated, in 1546, to the Sieur de Bourgogne;
and ten years later another to Galliazzo Carraccioli. In writing
to the former, he gives a proof of pure Christianity and of great-
ness of soul, and at the same time of his skill in addressing
persons of rank. The second Epistle to the Corinthians was
dedicated to Melchior Wolmar, to whom Calvin expresses his
thankfulness, while he reminds him of the days of his youth,
which he spent with him. The Epistles to the Galatians, Ephe-
sians, Philippians, Colossians, were dedicated to Christopher,
archduke of Wirtemberg and Miimpelgard, to strengthen him in
his christian course. But the first Epistle to the Thessalonians
he dedicated, in 1551, to the aged Maturin Cordier, his former
teacher, principal of the gymnasium at Lausanne, and to whom
he expresses his gratitude that he so carefully instructed him in
his early years. In the year 1551 he sent his Commentary on
the Second Epistle to the Corinthians to his physician, Textor,
whom he thanks for his friendship, and adds, " When I think of
my departed wife, I am daily admonished how much I am in-
debted to you, both because you once before cured her of
a heavy sickness, and employed all your art and efforts to
afford her help in her last sufferings." In 1548 he dedicated
the two Epistles to Timothy to the duke of Somerset, that, as
Paul exhorted Timothy, so he might exhort the youthful king,
and show him in what the true church consisted. The Epistle
to Titus he dedicated to Farel and Viret, as we have already
stated. Mention has also been made of the Catholic Epistles,
and of that to the Hebrews.
Calvin's methodical unity of thought, which he yet knew how
to combine with freedom, was strongly shown in his scientific
style of interpretation. He wished to cultivate reverential feel-
A.D. 1544.] CALVIN AND CASTELLIO. 33
ings rather than mere knowledge, hut he never unexegetically
sacrificed the meaning of Scripture to the desire to establish a
particular doctrine. He was therefore naturally averse to all
hot-headed people, who rashly rushed onward before their time.
This leads us to speak again of his dignified opposition to the
celebrated Castellio. His struggle for doctrine and discipline in
the church began with the year 1544. We pass over a polemical
intermezzo which he had with Chaponneau, a minister at Neu-
chatel, which is only interesting on account of a characteristic
letter, addressed to a party in that city, which it drew from
Calvin. He met Chaponneau's strife-loving disposition in an
indirect way, showing his own disinclination to dispute, and at
the same time the little worth of his opponent. So also he
stated to the members of the church at Neuchatel his opinion
of their rules in respect to discipline and ecclesiastical censures.
He touches upon, and explains, all the difficulties which had any-
thing to do with the delicate office of correcting manners. " Let
it be universally agreed," he says, " that the erring should be
openly exposed ; they would otherwise go to other churches, and
so all discipline would cease."
This operation of spiritual censures throws some light also
upon the affair of Castellio, who was the representative in his
age of that free, passionate spirit which has only in later times
burst forth and become so fearless.
Calvin became acquainted with Castellio at the university of
Strasburg in 1539-40. He lived for some time in the same
house with him, and endeavoured to obtain the diligent young
man, the ingenious student of antiquity, for Geneva, it always
being the wish of the great reformer to secure for his church a
scientific cultivation. But Castellio was determined to be a
theologian also. Beza described him, according to his own style,
by the Greek term ISioyvcoficov, self-opinionated. His residence
at Geneva, as principal tutor in the Gymnasium, lasted about
three years. He did not receive any appointment as a preacher,
but he now began to put forth some singular cxegetical opinions
on scriptural subjects. Thus he declared the Canticles to be a
mere obscene song, especially the seventh chapter. It was
written, he said, by Solomon in his youth, and ought to be struck
out of the canon. He never considered the difficulty of setting-
bounds to such experiments, and to what end they would lead
where the catholics were concerned. His pervcrseness was even
VOL. II. D
34 CALVIN AND CASTELLIO. [CHAP. XI.
still more apparent in his denial of the descent of Christ into
hell, in his refusal to receive Calvin's intelligent and cautious
exposition of the subject, or to consider the vast importance of a
reference to the sentiments of the early believers.
Calvin was obliged to declare aloud his disapprobation of this
conduct. He spared him, from the great regard which he enter-
tained for him, as much as he could; but Castellio, deeply
tided; wished to enter into an open discussion with him on
the point in dispute. The council refused its consent, and
thereby evinced its discretion ; but for the sake of truth, and
not to limit the freedom of opinion, the discussion was allowed
to take ptace in the presence of the assembled preachers. It
was continued a long while, but without any good result. Cas-
tellio was now so embittered, that he openly abused the ministers
in a sort of congregation, in which every one was allowed to
bring forward his complaints. He then took his departure, but
without being obliged to leave Geneva in a degrading manner,
as Beza falsely reports.
This occurrence is worthy of attention, because it was the
first time that the council was wholly on Calvin's side; and
through him it was that that union of opinion was established upon
which the safety of the protestant church entirely depended.
It appears indeed, from the whole of Castellio's history, that he
was by no means a man of vicious disposition, but an ingenious,
bold and earnest theologian, interesting and worthy of esteem,
notwithstanding his failings, which mainly arose from incon-
sideratcness, a want of forbearance and love of strife. He was
such a person, in short, as the French call nne mauvaise tetc.
Tlis ability was not sufficiently exalted to enable him to under-
stand Calvin's worth and calling as a peace-maker in those times
of excitement, and he named that despotism which was really
but Bdelity to duty. Bayle was as little able to understand
Calvin. This is evident when, at the end of his article on Cas-
tellio, he observes, that the latter had only failed in not knowing
how kings— that is, theologians who hold the rank of autho-
rities — must be managed. Schlosser judges him correctly, when
he (' him, Castcllio, as "the learned, but unfortunate,
•I and restless Sebastian." Beza regarded him as honest;
and the testimony given him by Calvin and the minister;- of
Geneva tends equally to prove his integrity. The first cause of
annoyance between these two distinguished men was connected
A.D. 1544.] CALVIN AND CASTELLIO. 35
with the printing of Castellio's French translation of the Bible,
which Calvin would willingly have corrected, but Castellio
would not allow him.
Castellio bore himself so unbecomingly in the whole of this
affair, that we may easily account, by his passionate conduct in
the one instance, for his rage in other and later occurrences
against the reformer. Calvin wrote to Fare], May 30, 1544 :
" I now again see what it is to live in Geneva. I lie among
thorns. There have been terrible quarrels among my colleagues
during the last two months. Our Castellio, on the other hand,
raves against us with the fury of despair. About sixty hearers
were present at the meeting yesterday, when the Scriptures were
expounded. The following passage was proposed : 4 Let us
prove ourselves the servants of God in all long suffering/ Cas-
tellio now raised a constant opposition, in order to create between
us and Christ's servants the greatest possible dissension. Thus
he played with the words in this manner : c Paul was a servant
of God, — we serve only ourselves : he was the most patient of men ;
— we are impatience itself: he watched the night through for
the edifying of the church, — we watch to amuse ourselves : he
was modest and temperate, — we have a drunken boldness : he
was persecuted by the rebellious, — we excite them: he was
chaste, — we are licentious : he was himself cast into prison, — we
cast others in, if they but utter a word against us : he looked to
the power of God,— we to the strength of others : he was op-
pressed,— but we oppress, and that the innocent/ What more
is necessary ? It was in short a cruel, exciting speech through-
out. I was silent for the moment, lest a greater dispute might
be kindled in the presence of our numerous friends, but I com-
plained to the syndics. Such a conduct marks the beginning of
all schismatics. I am induced to oppose myself to his rage, not
so much on account of the perverseness of his conduct and the
rashness of his abuse, as because of the perfect groundlessness
of his accusations*."
At Basel, where it was not felt to be so absolutely a duty to
contend for unity, Castellio was appointed to the office of Greek
professor. If we again consider the relation in which these two
eminent men stood to each other, we shall find that Castellio
* Other letters however exist which show, that, full of indignation as Calvin
was on account of Castellio's slanderous abuse, he yet continued to befriend
him. Thus he recommended, him to his acquaintances, only lamenting his
fierce and inconsiderate conduct: 1544 (MS. Gen.). In a letter to Viret,
March 20, 1544 (MS. Gen.), he says, " Consider what can be done for him."
d2
3G CALVIN AND CASTELLIO. [CHAP. XI.
continued all his life through the same noble but absurd cham-
pion of unlimited toleration; while Calvin, as the supporter of
the grand truth which he viewed as the source of life, pursued
with enthusiasm to the end of his career the one great object
which he had always in view. The strife was soon revived. Cas-
tellio published a paper on the doctrine of predestination and
justification, as founded on the ninth chapter of the Romans. It
was directed against Calvin's principles. The essay on toleration
is also generally, and rightly, ascribed to him : it appeared after
the trial of Servetus, under the assumed name of Martin Bellius,
and with the following title, " Haeretici, an sint persequendi,
mul tor. sentential" Calvin answered this work. Beza also
wrote a very strong reply to it, at Lausanne, under the title of
(: De Haereticis a magistratu gladio puniendis." He supported
his views with great talent, painted Servetus in the darkest
colours, and undertook the defence of his friend against all
assailants. But Castellio was not yet silenced. An anonymous
writing, the author of which Calvin and Beza could easily guess,
appeared at Paris, under the title of " Extracts from the Latin
and French works of Calvin." In this publication the funda-
mental doctrine of election, that which supplied all deficiencies,
was trodden underfoot with the biting wit and the keen logic
which might have been looked for from a Voltaire. Beza and
Calvin however exhibited far greater ability in the answer, and
again trod the adversary in the dust. Worth and dignity were
on their side, and it cannot be denied that Castellio would have
done better to be silent. It is not so much matter of surprise,
therefore, that they should have spoken severely of him in the
preface to their translation of the New Testament, and warned
every Christian to beware of a man "who had been chosen by
Satan to deceive the thoughtless and indifferent." Castellio
indeed, in his Apology, published in 1558, complains of Calvin's
fierceness against him, and declares that he had never seen the
two works which Calvin ascribed to him*. But who can doubt
that they were his, when they breathe so entirely his spirit?
Still we must praise the moderate tone of this Apology. He
accuses the reformer of believing too easily all the evil which
was told him of his opponents. Among other things Calvin,
deceived by a false report, had accused him of stealing wood to
warm his chamber. Castellio spoke very temperately of this
slander, and cleared it up in the following manner. He was
* Bayle, art. Castellio.
A.D. 1544,] CALVIN ON ASTROLOGY. 37
indeed in very necessitous circumstances, having to bring up a
family of four sons and four daughters. In order to finish his
translation of the Scriptures, he was obliged to sit up during the
night, and to provide fuel he went to the bank of a stream which
flows into the Rhine, to pick up the pieces of wood borne down
by the current, and which two hundred men had done at the
same time. He appealed to all Basel in proof of the truth of
this statement. This gives us a glimpse of the state in which
this great and accomplished scholar lived. He had not the
means of warming his chamber, and such was his poverty or
necessity, that he was obliged to cultivate by his own labour a
little spot of ground outside the city. He died in want, in the
year 1563, and was buried in the grave of Grynseus. But his
remains were subsequently disinterred, and some Polish students
buried him in the high church at Basel, adorning his tomb with
an inscription. Montaigne* devotes to him some expressions
of sympathy : " To the great shame of our age, two distinguished
scholars, as I hear, have died before our very eyes in a condition
in which they had not sufficient to eat, — Lelio Giraldi in Italy,
and Castellio in Germany. Thousands, I should think, would
have come to their help had they only known their state."
We may close our account of Calvin's present labours by the
mention of two works, which had an immediate relation to the
common intellectual character of the period. They show how
sick the world was, and form a proper introduction to that
which we have to say on the anti-christianity of those times.
The first is a work against relics : it is written with much
humour and irony, and was likely to be useful from its popular
tendency. The second was a treatise against astrology. Although
a certain degree of light had been diffused, even the most power-
ful minds were affected by the remains of superstition, and it
was Calvin's peculiar characteristic to be able by his own active
spirit to penetrate, in that unlearned age, the mists of error and
falsehood. Even Beza himself, according to Schlosser, believed
at one time in astrological signs, and thought that the appear-
ance of the famous star in Cassiopea betokened the overthrow of
all things. It is well known that Melancthon inclined to this
weakness. The regions of presentiment and mysticism were
equally strange to Calvin, and there are only two cases in which
such matters are touched upon. In the very year in which his
work against astrology appeared, he wrote to Yiret, Septem-
* Essais, lib. i. ch. 34.
38 CALVIX ON ASTROLOGY. [CHAP. XI.
ber 23 : " In the packet which you lately forwarded to me,
were letters from Poland : they contained nothing new, except
the account that a lake (in ditione Marcicii) had appeared for
two days like blood, and that the people had here and there
taken up masses of the gore. A fearful wonder, the meaning of
which will soon become clear to us. There being now so many
fables abroad, I can scarcely believe it, till our booksellers come
back from the fair." In speaking of one of Calvin's sicknesses
Beza says, " He was lying in bed ; it was Saturday ; the north
wind had raged terribly for the last two days ; Calvin lifted up
his voice in the presence of many persons, and said, ( I know
not what I ought to think of it, but the whole night through I
have seemed to hear a tremendous sound of warlike instruments,
and I could not convince myself that it was not so. Let us, I
beseech you, pray ; for certain it is that some great event is at
hand.' And, strange to say, on that very day the great battle
of Dreux was fought."
It is not uninteresting to hear the remarks of so clear a mind
on the then famous science of the heavenly bodies, especially at
a time when the curtain has fallen, and a Chalmers has brought
this new branch of knowledge into harmony with the Gospel.
Calvin had yet no idea of the system of Copernicus, although
the work of that astronomer was written in 1530. "The whole
heaven moves itself around the earth," said Calvin, even in the
last edition of his Institutes. The writings of Aristarchus of
Samos, the only one among the ancients who awoke out of
the egoistical dream, had been but lately discovered ; and how
slowly this knowledge was diffused appears from the case of
Galileo, who in 1610 first ventured to proclaim the truth of the
new system. Somewhat l$ter Beza shows., in his work on the
plague, that he was acquainted with the Copernican system,
though he might not understand it.
Astrology is certainly indebted for its origin to the desire of
the human spirit to look upwards, and there, above, to seek the
solution of all mysteries. Nor is the influence of the heavens
on the organisation of man to be despised. The repressed super-
si ii ion of catholics and protestants had now again concentrated
itself in this art. familiar in Calvin's time to all men of learning.
Francis I. dismissed his physician because he had shown himself
unwilling to prophesy from the stars respecting the future. The
celebrated Renata, duchess of Ferrara, the friend of Calvin and
a promoter of the pure faith, received instruction from her
A.D. 1544,] CALVIN ON ASTROLOGY. 39
astrologer, Luc Gauric, in order not to be ignorant of the matter.
At the court of king Henry II., Francis II. and Charles IX.
the far-famed Michael Nostradamus, doctor and professor of
medicine, enjoyed as much distinction as if he had been really
endowed with the prophetic spirit. He had, as well as Luc
Gauric, foretold the death of the king in a duel, which happened
in close agreement with their predictions. The influence indeed
of this error arose to such a height in France in the time of
Catherine, that both the church and the state found it necessary
to check it. Under the old system of astronomy, which regarded
the heavens only in relation to the earth, and the latter as the
central point of the whole, the notion could be easily justified
that the stars were the language of God, seeing that all was ap-
pointed for the use of man alone.
Calvin, who opposed himself to this error, did not intend to
write a learned work on the subject, but such a one as might be
useful to persons of moderate understanding. " God," he simply
says, " has given us his word, but men surrender themselves to
superstition. The true astrology and astronomy is the know-
ledge of heaven. We learn from Moses that God appointed the
sun and the stars for the day and the night, for months and
seasons. But it is not given to every one to understand their
courses, their changes, or their oppositions. This belongs to
science." — " Astronomy teaches the period of time which each
planet requires for its course round the sun, what relations the
sun has to the other planets, and how eclipses may be calculated
even to a minute. The fact is this : our astrologers start with
the correct principle, that all earthly bodies are subject to those
above ; but they draw a wrong conclusion herefrom. Natural
astrology teaches rightly that the moon exercises an influence on
bodies ; that, for example, when it grows or wanes, the joints arc
more or less affected ; and from this science of astrology physi-
cians derive what insight they possess. We are therefore
obliged to confess that there is a certain degree of harmony
between the stars and human bodies. But these presumptuous
people have invented, under the name of an art, a system of
astrology, which is twofold, and consists, 1. in the knowledge
of nature and the organisation of man, and 2. in an inquiry
into all the occurrences of human life, — into what men have to
do and suffer, what will be the issue of their undertakings, — nay,
into the minutest affairs of existence." He then shows them, in
his peculiar and cutting style, that they are fools who believe in
such a system.
40 THE ANABAPTISTS. [CHAP. XI.
We find from this writing, that Calvin despised all such things
as presentiments, regarding them in the same light as astrology,
and that he recognized no slumbering and re-awakening faculty
in man to look into the future. Thus he rejected the predictions
of Ascletario, who foretold Domitian his death, and those of
Spurinna, who warned Csesar to beware of the Ides of March,
lie thus argues : — " I ask you, whether there were not many
other persons born at Rome, and in Italy, on the same day and
under the same star as Caesar? Did they all die on the same
day, and by a similar death? It is evident then that there is no
truth in your art, since, if there were, what happens to one must
happen to all. There may be thirty who have the same nativity :
one may die when he is thirty, another when he is fifty ; one at
home, another in battle. Theagenes had foretold Augustus that
he would be emperor, having been born under the sign of Capri-
corn : but how many poor wretches were there not born under
the same sign, and who attained to no higher glory than that of
being swineherds or cowherds ? If the stars had given the king-
dom, not only to Augustus, but to all the rest who were born
under the same sign, a very little portion of territory would have
remained for him."
" Let us allow," he continues, " that some predictions are ful-
filled ; still, this is only the devil's work. God allows it, in order
to punish disbelievers, as he did in the case of Saul." Thus he
ascribes the whole of this dark side of human knowledge to the
influence of the evil spirit. It appears also that people in his
time had gone very far in these practices : he speaks of the
secret exorcism of spirits ; and in contemporary writings, as for
example in the life of Cellini, it is mentioned, that a marvellous
necromancer dwelt in the Coliseum at Rome. " Who," he asks,
"has made the devils subject to them, that they should serve them?
The children of God cannot but regard them as their most cruel
enemies, must flee from or repel them, instead of seeking com-
munion with them. They who would make use of their service
will at last see that they have played into the hand of their
master."
It should be remarked that Calvin has said nothing respecting
magnetism and clairvoyance, by which the whole empire of the
supernatural is placed under another and higher point of view,
unknown to the reformers.
W e proceed now to consider the anti-christianity of those
times. Having seen how Calvin, by his Institutes, endeavoured
to give stability and consistency to the whole church, and then
A. U. 1544.] SPIRITUAL LIBERTINISM. 41
directed his attention to the common necessities of the age, we
have at present to examine more particularly the efforts which
he made at Geneva to fix the constitution and discipline of his
church. In order to do this, we must first describe the character
of his opponents. Full of the thought that the Gospel is no
speculation, and that it is but a dead letter without a christian
life, he could not fail to regard all as antagonists who ridiculed
what is spiritual and moral. Yet, as in the middle ages the
rude violence of the world, which so long resisted the power of
the papacy, was at length compelled to give way, so, in this case,
libertinism was in the end subjected to a moral rule.
CHAFfER XII.
ANABAPTISTS. — SPIRITUAL LIBERTINES. — THE ANTICHRIS-
TIANITY OF GENEVA. POLITICAL LIBERTINES OPPOSED
TO THE REFUGEES.
It is evident that the principles which gave birth to the opposi-
tion which Calvin had to endure in Geneva, were diffused
through the whole church, but had their stronghold in that city ;
as if, according to Beza's remark, the power of evil was to be
manifested in its most satanic forms where it was to meet with
the boldest resistance. Popery no longer concealed its worst
features : it was unmasked. Far more dangerous was the spirit
of malice, which was inwardly consuming the life of the re-
awakened church. Under the veil of a pious pantheism, and the
form of a new, more perfect doctrine, that spirit was seeking to
win away unstable souls. How well it succeeded in this appears
from the case of queen Margaret of Navarre, who protected the
spiritual libertines at her court, and in consequence quarreled
with Calvin. This is sufficient to prove how necessary it was
that he should stand forth, and endeavour to quiet the waves
which had been raised by the storm of various passions, and of
life, now in the progress of its new development. The awaken-
ing of a fresh principle must ever be attended with something
unusual. When the human spirit is excited by great objects,
it goes forward with the same daring feeling which prompted it
42 SPIRITUAL LIBERTINISM. [CHAP.XH.
to the overthrow of idols, and easily yields itself up to the ideas
which carry with them the contempt of all rule and order. The
anabaptists are an example of this perversion.
It is well known that, when Luther was residing on the Warfc-
burg, great disturbance was created at Wittenberg through a
sect of this kind. He left the castle to restore quiet, and de-
livered, during eight successive days, his famous sermons, so
distinguished by practical good sense and discretion, against the
spirit of fanaticism. But neither his powerful influence*, nor
the death of Thomas Munzer, and the disgraceful defeat of the
fanatics at Miinster, availed wholly to suppress their errors. The
same notions, not long after, took another and more speculative
direction^ — not so rude, but equally deceptious. The main doc-
trine of the anabaptists was the necessity of re-baptism in
mature years, and the rejection of infant baptism as not apo-
stolical. The libertines went much further : they were pantheists
of the worst kind, trampling all morality to the ground, as well
as Christianity, against which they raged in the most awful
manner.
Calvin, to confute their erring and wretched notions, wrote
against both. The work against the libertines appears, in the
Amsterdam edition, with the date 1544: that against the ana-
baptists was of the same year,, but is written with so much
solidity that it deserves to be read in all times. The two works
are closely connected, the notion of an individual inspiration
being the fundamental error, and that which required to be com-
bated, in both sects.
In the preface to the second work, Calvin writes to the brethren
of Ncuchatel, who had begged him to oppose the fanatics, and
states, that he dedicated his book to them as a public proof of the
friendship which was so dear to him, and that the world might
see how they agreed in zeal and doctrine. "Our William Fare!,
who is endowed by the Holy Spirit with so many excellent gifts,
and who, as an old veteran, has ever stood forth against the
aiei of Cod, has already done more than was necessary in
thai which you have required of me."
The first error, namely that children ought not to be baptized,
and thai those only ought to be admitted to the rite who are
walking in the Lord, is thus refuted: "In the time of the
apostlei children were baptized: the command of Jesus refers
only to unbelievers. Christians who enjoy the promise have
* x.d. 1522.
A.D. 1545.] SPIRITUAL LIBERTINISM. 43
received it also for their children. These are baptized because
they are already in the covenant, and are so born. The circum-
cision of children was practised among the Jews, and had refer-
ence to repentance and conversion/'
In respect to excommunication, they supposed that open sin,
after a second admonition, rendered the offender ripe for the in-
fliction of the anathema ; and further, that even he who sinned
through ignorance, though still more he who willingly trans-
gressed, could never receive forgiveness. According to their
notions therefore every actual sin is a sin against the Holy
Ghost, which is blasphemy.
"To what does this lead?5' asks Calvin. "What Christian
lives without sin ? and where, if such a doctrine be correct, is
the consolation for penitents ? Actual sin is not always sin
against the Holy Ghost, but is only so when the transgressor
opposes himself with all his might to divine truth. A man
however may actually sin, though he has never declared war
against God or blasphemed his word." Some excellent obser-
vations follow against every species of separatism. " These people
want a perfectly pure church, and insist that no believer ought
to remain in a church which does not excommunicate all who
are wicked/5 In opposition to this he says, " A church may
exist with imperfections. Every church is stained with sin.
The prophets and Christ are members of the church, though it
be conjoined with reprobate communities. We ought to improve,
not to separate."
Again : " Those who dream of a perfect church are unwilling
to recognize any temporal power in the church, or any authority
independent of itself, seeing that it is perfect in itself. Excom-
munication has supplied the place of the sword. Christ, they
say, would not judge the adulteress, nor decide between the
brethren, nor be a king, nor allow his brethren to exercise au-
thority."
So also he justifies the christian oath, as grounded on the Old
Testament, and not abrogated by the New. Lastly, he confutes
the doctrinal errors of the fanatics. They spoke of the Lord's
having a heavenly body, as the Marcionites contended for his
having only an apparent body, whence it would follow that Christ
was not really man. So too they reasoned of a sleep after dearth,
which error Calvin had already opposed in his Psychopanny-
chia.
But although he designated these people as dreamers, and
44 SPIRITUAL LIBERTINISM. [CHAP. XII.
even as swine, who delighted to wallow in the mire., a tone of
pity and great gentleness pervades his work, as if it were in-
tended to be addressed to those who had only exalted themselves
too much from a well-intended though erroneous design. It
appears that the anabaptists, though pursued with fire and
sword in catholic countries, instead of being so reckless in his
time as they had been at an earlier period in Germany, were now
well-disposed. This was not the case with the libertines.
In order to justify a free and licentious life by christian prin-
ciples, the spiritual had united with the political libertines in
exhibiting a false view of christian freedom. They were distin-
guished from the German fanatics in this, that they grounded
immorality on a system. No attempt to characterize them is
made in the smaller lives of Calvin, and even Schrockh passes
them over in his church history. Calvin's work against them
is very original and peculiar.
He describes this sect as il reprobate, and not merely sinful,
but horribly corrupt above all others. Its end is licentiousness :
it gives a false idea of freedom, and calls itself spiritual. Those
who hear these people speak might suppose them to be carried
away by their raptures above the skies. Their heresy reminds
us of that of Cerdo, who adopted the notion of two principles,
and denied the resurrection. This was the case also with Mar-
cian, with the Gnostics and the Manichaeans. They took some-
thing from all, but rejected the Gospel, and gave nicknames to
the apostles. Neither wit nor reason can be found in their
speech, no more than it could in what old women might say on
astronomy. And I am expected to be silent when the name of
Christ is abused, and when it is employed to screen the intro-
duction of such wickedness into the world as has never been
heard of, and thus to expose him again to the shame of being
accounted worse than a demon. Were I to do this, 1 should be
baser than a dog, which will not allow his master to be attacked
without at least barking. I must cry out aloud then with a clear
voice, so that if heresy dare boldly utter its wretched and horrible
blasphemies, this may be heard above them."
" It would be ridiculous were I to oppose myself to the pope
and his coadjutors with all my power (for I cannot edify the
church of God if I do not make war with those who would pull
it down), and yet should excuse those who are still worse enemies
of God, and much greater destroyers of the truth. For the pope
docs allow a shadow of religion to remain ; he takes not away
A.D. 1545.] SPIRITUAL LIBERTINISM. 45
the hope of eternal life ; he desires men to fear God ; he makes a
distinction between good and evil; he acknowledges our Lord
Jesus Christ to be true God and true man ; he ascribes honour
to the Word of God. But the only end which these people have
in view is to confound heaven and earth together, and to nullify
all religion. All, even the little children, ought to spit at them
in sign of horror, as they see them passing along the streets, and
thus to heap infamy upon those who, by supporting them, have
been the cause of ruin to thousands of souls."
Calvin next complains greatly of their unintelligible, mystical
mode of expression, and accuses them of playing the catholic
under the pretence of christian freedom. They indulged in an
allegorical interpretation of the Bible. Calvin, on the other hand,
shows what Paul meant when he said, i The letter killeth.' On
the one side they exalted themselves very high and desired to be
called spiritual, and on the other they sank down into the very
mire. 'Their main defence was, that there is only one spirit;
but it is a very different thing to say with Scripture that all
creatures come from God, and that what God has created is God
himself. They speak of the devil as identical with the world and
sin. The devil and his angels have no proper existence : wicked-
ness is only a negation of good, and the distinction between good
and evil vanishes. The human soul is not eternal, since it is of
the world. The spirit accomplishes whatever is done in the uni-
verse. Man has no freedom, and therefore everything is good to
him ; or, in other words, God commits sin. Thus both the belief
in God and every trace of morality are lost in their system,
crimes of every kind, even those pertaining to God, being allowed.
The consequences are, first, the blasphemous position, that God
is the devil himself, not providence ; secondly, that men have
no conscience or ability to distinguish right from wrong ; thirdly,
that all kinds of sin are to be praised, and that none are punish-
able, all being the work of God/
These conclusions are assailed in a manner as convincing as it
is pious. The Scriptures are the source of the writer's arguments :
he shows by the strongest evidence that God performs his own
proper work, and man his, without God's either assisting man
too much or taking too much from him. Christ, according to
the Libertine system, is the spirit which is in the world, and in
us all. The death upon the cross was in appearance only.
Christ is in his people : they are all Christ, and can no more
suffer, all being now accomplished. The new birth consists in
46 SPIRITUAL LIBERTINISM. [CHAP. XII.
the power of suppressing the fear of God and conscience, and in
living according to Christian freedom. Men can sin no more in
that perfected state of innocence. The freedom thus possessed
is boundless ; as if Paul, who is cited, had allowed them to steal,
to slay and commit every species of licentiousness. Calvin
proves, on the contrary, that the law retains its force for Chris-
tians, with this distinction only, that it no longer condemns us
without recall, grace being provided by the Gospel. " Let every
man live according to his inclination." It is thus that they under-
stand what Paul says of the calling of Christians. But Calvin
shows that we ought to follow the inward calling of God. If
every one were to obey his own inclinations as a call, married
people might separate from each other. The new marriage is a
spiritual marriage.
And further. They would fain establish a perfect community
of goods. Calvin however proves that the first Christians under-
stood thereby nothing more than the greatest degree of liberality
and benevolence. The resurrection, they say, is already passed,
seeing that the spirit now returns to God*.
We shall shortly find to what extent these principles obtained
ground in Geneva : they were not those of the anabaptists,
which never revived after they had been opposed and openly
confuted by Calvin, but the doctrines of an antichristian pan-
theism.
It appears that in France the higher ranks wrere especially
infected by this spiritual libertinism. Those who had rejected
Catholicism in their hearts misused their christian freedom, living
according to their will, but preserving an appearance of attach-
ment to catholic forms. The enemies of the faith therefore took
advantage of the publication of the work against the libertines to
ite the queen of Navarre against Calvin, her favourites Quin-
tin and Poquea having been rendered ridiculous by the satirical
freedom with which he had treated their names. When he
Learned at Geneva the change which had taken place in her opi-
nions, he wrote to her, and in a style which combined equal
dignity, firmness and prudence t« A perfect understanding was
hereby restored between them, and the sect, which had spread
ter to the Faithful of Rouen refers to the same subject. Tt was written
" Contre un Franciscain Bectateur dea erreurs des libertins." Farel also wrote
against this wretched sect. Calvin had exhorted him to do all in his power
to suppress it. A Franciscan wrote an answer to his work,
t According to 13eza, " ingenue ct cordate."
A.D. 1546.] SPIRITUAL LIBERTINES. 47
itself at various times over France, was for ever suppressed, no
trace of it remaining except in Belgium.
The system of the libertines however exhibited itself at Geneva
under still darker colours. A perfectly formed antichristianity,
a true offspring of hell, sprung forth. We learn from many cir-
cumstances that this spiritual libertinism was in close union with
the political, but not necessarily so. Among the signs of the
evil spirit thus existing we may particularly mention the blas-
phemies uttered against the truth of the Gospel. These are
found in the work of a certain Genevese citizen of the libertine
party, and exhibited in the most hideous forms. An utter dis-
regard for all morality is shown, among other instances, in the
trial of the wife of the councillor Ameaux. Proofs of supersti-
tion and of the grossest egotism, are afforded, especially in the
compacts formed with the devil, in order to obtain from him a
certain degree of power. These appear in the process against
the persons who were accused of diffusing the plague. Number-
less other things of an equally infamous character, but of a dif-
ferent kind, are grouped together.
Gruet's work is now only known by the sentence pronounced
upon him, and by Calvin's extract. As even this however was
never generally circulated, Gruet was always confounded with
the authors of the "Three Impostors*." But it is certain that
he had no hand in that work. He speaks of God and Christ, of
Moses, the prophets, and the apostles, but never of Mahomet,
which could not have been unobserved by Calvin. The main
object of his work seems to have been to show, that the founders
of both Judaism and Christianity were deceivers, and that Christ
was justly put to death. But the work entitled "Dc Tribus
Impostoribus n is a species of philosophical treatise, in which a
disbeliever pretends to show, tranquilly and with regret, but
without abuse, that the three revealed religions are founded in
fraud, and that the only true religion is that of nature.
The world wras for three hundred years mystified respecting
this production : it was at length printed. Till it was thus
made known, it was dreaded as a kind of monster lurking in
secret. People considered that they were affording one of the
best proofs of conversion if, just before their death, they burnt the
extracts from this work which (hey had secretly obtained at
some exorbitant price. But Gruet's work was still more adapted
* Traite des Trois Imposteurs, 1777. Diss, de la Monnoye, p. 108.
48 gruet's condemnation. [chap.xii.
to horrify the world, and we owe a debt of gratitude to those by
whom it was destroyed. The present generation is tolerably well
hardened against atheistical writings, but the daring blasphemy
of this production was so frightful, that no one could read it
without terror; for what are all the antichristian writings of the
French revolution compared with the hellish laughter which
seemed to peal from its pages*?
It was not till a later period that the work to which we allude
was discovered, but it was at the present time (1545-6) that it
was written, and secretly read at Geneva. The principles of the
anti-calvinistic party are sufficiently apparent. The pantheism
of the libertines led directly to atheism, and this, among the
initiated, to a secret but most decided hatred to Christ. How
indeed could such a wicked and blasphemous disposition have
developed itself in Gruet, had he not been living in the midst of
an infected atmosphere ? The book consisted of thirteen sheets,
was in Gruet's own handwriting, and was bound in parchment.
It was discovered in 1550, under the roof of his own house,
where he had probably placed it at the time of his apprehension,
and was delivered to the magistrate. Only some single, detached
passages were found among his papers, but they seem to have
contained the elements out of which the work was composed.
They formed the foundation of the charge of blasphemy brought
against him, and in pursuance of which he was condemned to
death. The work itself was burnt, but Calvin's remarks, and
the evidence respecting its general character,' are sufficient for
the permanent justification of the Genevese magistrates, who,
according to their principles and the feeling of their times,
believed themselves bound to punish such offenders with the
sword, and whom we still deem it right to load with chains.
The corruption of morals in Geneva has been already men-
tioned. It is evident, even from the numerous trials for witch-
craft, that the state of manners in that city was fierce and turbu-
lent. Men, clothed in black and masked, frequently appeared
to women, and gave themselves out for the devil, intending no
* Although this work, De Tribus Impostorihus, is attributed by many to the
emperor Frederic II., or rather to his chancellor Petrus a Vineis, it is probably
a production of the sixteenth century. It is written in Latin, and bears the
tit lc. !)>• Tmpo8turis religionum breve Compendium. There have been two editions
of the Latin text ; the latter with the title, De Tribus Impostorihus. A later
work, of thr Bame blasphemous character, has appeared in French, which
however is nothing more than a copy of the L' Esprit do Spinoza. A sect
known as that of the LucianLts existed in the latter half of the sixteenth cen-
tury, and from this proceeded the De Tribus Impostorihus.
A.D. 1546.] SPIRITUAL LIBERTINES. 49
doubt to fill their minds with terror, and subject them to their
will.
But this immorality received a new impulse from the principles
of the spiritual libertines ; and numberless processes before the
tribunals prove that this state of things must have long continued.
The account of the wife of the councillor Ameaux belongs to
the same period. Her principles, which were identical with
those of the libertines, show by their very nature that they were
not gathered from the clouds, or created by the wanderings of a
sick or phrenzied mind. It was the wish of her friends to make
it believed that she was mad: they hoped by that means to
secure her escape. But her opinions had a deeper root; and
her conduct compromised her husband, whose condemnation
followed at a later period. According to the report of her trial,
she not only gave herself up to the grossest immorality, but
justified this immorality as founded in principle. The process
shows, that she was convinced that she might place herself at
the disposal of any believer. This was a notion common to the
spiritual libertines, as appears from the trial of Gruet, and other
acts. "It is in this sense," she said, "we ought to take the
communion of saints, spoken of in the Apostles' Creed ; for
this communion can never be perfect, till all things are common
among the faithful, goods, houses, and the body. Believers
have then only reached the highest grade of love when they
understand this principle. No one ought to forbid this com-
munion even between the nearest relatives. Such a union is
holy, if it take place between a protestant and a catholic, since,
according to Saint Paul, the believer sanctifies the unbeliever.
A union of this kind cannot be forbidden without wickedness,
the first command which God gave to man being, ' Increase and
multiply 9."
The consistory and the council employed themselves earnestly
about these matters, and granted the husband the separation
which he desired. The woman was committed to prison for life.
At a somewhat later period, the history of Ilaoul Monnet, a
representative of the madness and folly of this sect, affords a
further illustration of the prevailing power of Antichrist. Raoul
boasted his illicit connection with women of the highest families
in Geneva, especially with the wife of the first syndic Perrin.
He had a collection of obscene prints, copied from Aretino, and
which he insultingly called his New Testament : so too he had
spoken disgracefully of his fatherland.
VOL. II. E
50 THE PLAGUE AT GENEVA. [CHAP. XII.
Raoul was beheaded, and his pictures were burnt by the
common hangman. He had been long connected with the fac-
tion of Perrin, and it was only shortly before his apprehension
that he had left it. This party, well-skilled in the arts of in-
trigue, hastened as much as possible his execution, that he might
not have time to address the people, and expose their conspira-
cies*. It is well-worthy of observation, that Calvin makes no
mention in any of his letters of these circumstances. They
might occur perhaps too rapidly, or they might seem of too
tragical a nature to form the subject of friendly communication.
But still more horrible was the iniquity of the egoism, which
appeared in the alliance of the so-called mfectionists. A pestilen-
tial disorder had for many years prevailed in Geneva, and the
surrounding districts, to such a degree, that the population was
in fact decimated, two thousand inhabitants dying out of twenty
thousand, the highest estimate of the population of this little
city. All the relations of life were disturbed : the courts of
justice were closed; and the evil would have become still worse,
had not circumstances led to the discovery of a conspiracy, of
rare iniquity even in those times, formed by a set of wretches
who diffused the infection by means similar to those employed
in 1530. Their practice was to mix up the virus drawn from
those who were sick of the plague with salve, and then to place
it upon the locks and bars of doors, and on the lines in the
public streets. The disease was thus spread in the most awful
manner. Even some of the inspectors of the hospital were in
league with these wretches, whose only object it was to share
among each other what belonged to the dead. They had bound
themselves by an oath not to cease from this course, till Geneva,
as they expressed it, might be fed by a single measure of corn,
when it would be possible for them to take possession of the
entire cityf.
A man named Tallent betrayed the conspirators, and one
Lentille was the first brought to trial. He pretended to know
nothing of the matter, but said, that care ought to be taken to
. i. p. 426.
t Some suspicion respecting this crime existed at an earlier period. In the
registers of April 17, 1543, we read : "J. Goulaz, accuse d'avoir semeUapeste, a
trapades et le tourment des Bujegnins sans rien avouer ; on le
gardera ( acore i n prison, puis l'on avisera. June 8 : L'on soupconne que de
unit il y a des empoissonneurs, qui sement la peste par la ville. Ordonne
(I'm parler a Mr. Henri, portier de laTartasse. May 16, 1543: On bannit
pour trois ans, sons peine de 1'ouet, les maris des fe mines executives pour avoir
communique* la peste."
A.D. 1546.] HORRIBLE CONSPIRACY. 51
watch those who were engaged in the hospital, if the magistrates
wished to stop the pestilence. According to Spon and others,
the affair was made a matter of jest among these people : they
inquired, when they met each other, how the plague went on,
and gave it the name of the cripple, as death and fever have been
called. Thirty-one of these wretches were apprehended and
burnt: Jean Lentille died in consequence of the torture to
which he had been subjected : the physician and the two
assistants were quartered. Notwithstanding the horrible punish-
ments which the culprits had suffered, the same crime was re-
newed in 1568. It is impossible to account for the perpetration
of such enormities without supposing them to have been con-
nected with others of a still more secret character. We trace,
for example, the existence of a fanaticism among the conspirators,
which had its origin in superstition and in the most frightful
selfishness. They were resolved to destroy all or to gain all,
and their confessions show that they believed themselves pro-
tected against infection by a league with the devil; being indeed
guarded, and allowed to gain possession of the treasures of the
world, while they prayed to him, who has promised them to his
worshipers.
It may easily be conceived how these horrors afflicted Calvin
and all other holy men : he ascended the pulpit, and, deeply
moved, spoke with great vehemence against the levity and vice
which prevailed in the city. Convinced that the pestilence was a
scourge sent by God, he declared aloud that the corruption of
manners was the cause of the affliction, and besought the council
to inflict severer punishments on those guilty of adultery and
harlotry. He seems indeed from this time to have resolved that
adultery ought to be punished with death : the offence was
connected in his mind with others of a still higher kind ; he
regarded it as resulting from the anti-christianity of the age, and
which he desired to extirpate with fire and sword.
Some writers have sought in later times to throw suspicion
on these accounts, and to compare the belief in their truth to the
absurd notion which attributed the cholera to certain physicians,
and so to establish the position that fanaticism discovered
horrors where none existed. They seem however to forget that
it was the educated, and not the lower class of people, in Geneva
who undertook to punish the accused, that the crime was repeated
at three different times, and that a period of twenty years was
sufficient to afford ample opportunities for reflection, and for the
e 2
52 HORRIBLE CONSPIRACY. [CHAP. XII.
investigation of evidence. To this it may be added, that two of
the culprits were, with Calvin's help, converted, and by the grace
of God went tranquilly to their death. We cannot suppose that
they did not make a true confession to their spiritual adviser.
Calvin therefore may be taken as a witness, in whose testimony
we may place entire confidence : he speaks of their fanatical
ideas, but without saying anything further. It seems that they
were instigated to their hellish work by some fearful kind of
influence. Calvin viewed this with grief and awe; but he
communicated the fact to his friends very briefly, and without
attempting to determine what is true or false in the supposed
operations of Satan. This laconic mode of expressing himself
led to the suspicion that he did not willingly speak on the
subject. His own words are as follows* : — "The Lord is trying
us in a wonderful manner. A short time back the discovery
was made of a conspiracy of men and women, who for three
years past have contrived by some species of witchcraft to cir-
culate the pestilence through the city. Already have fifteen
women been burnt : several men, dreadfully tortured, have killed
themselves in prison: there are still twenty-five in confinement.
But notwithstanding this, the locks on the doors of houses con-
tinue to be every day besmeared with the infectious salve. Such
are the clangers to which we are exposed. God has hitherto
guarded our house, but it stands in the midst of perils. Well
it is that we know He careth for us. Farewell, my honoured
friend and dear brother ! "
To Farel he wrote t : — " Why should I relate to you what has
taken place in regard to the infection ? Weber (Textor) is with
you, and he can explain to you all the circumstances much more
clearly than I could in a letter. Renat has filled us with surprise :
it is perfectly wonderful that a man who remained firm under
torture should be overcome by a supposed promise ; that is, by its
being told him that I had obtained the promise of a pardon for
him from the council. His wife confessed that she had destroyed
eighteen men by witchcraft or poisoning, and that he had killed
four or five. The power of the Lord was wonderfully shown at
the death of this culprit, so perfect was the conversion of his
soul. In the morning he evinced no sign of repentance, but
still, as it seemed, hurried on by his fanaticism, he complained
that he was about to be punished though the Lord had pardoned
him. But the Lord, as I have said, has wrought marvellously
* MS. Gen. March 27, 1545. f MS. Gen. April 25, 1545.
A.D. 1546.] POLITICAL LIBERTINES. 53
and beyond my hope. Both met their death joyfully, with the
greatest firmness, with the strongest faith, and with the surest
indications of repentance."
About this time also a so-called wizard was apprehended at
Peney, but he was dismissed by the magistrates as a madman.
This is a proof that some distinction was made among offenders
of this kind.
To such an extent did these disorders proceed, that Geneva
was suspected by the people of the neighbouring states of being
engaged in the sale of poison. Thus in 1565 a simple, ignorant
man from the country came to the city for the purpose of pur-
chasing from the seigneurs, that is the council, a portion of the
well-known salve : he is said to have been in league with the
devil, and was burnt alive*.
In conjunction with the spiritual libertines, and as active in-
struments of the same spirit, were another class to which the name
of political libertines was applied. Among these may be ranked
those families in Geneva who, not comprehending Calvin's
theocratical views, employed all their influence to resist them.
This party desired nothing but emancipation from the despotism
of Savoy, and the establishment of free institutions. The Re-
formation offered them the means of attaining their end. They
were not necessarily connected with the spiritual libertines :
their leader Perrin does not appear to have been imbued with
any speculative anti-christian element, but to have simply desired
reputation and power. But Calvin was a stumbling-stone to
these people : so long as he stood with the thunder of his
eloquence, with his iron will, and with the Gospel in his hand,
they could not advance a step. Calvin's vocation and zealous
spiritual efforts were a riddle to them, and they ascribed his
conduct to a boundless ambition, judging his principles by their
own passions. Both parties were repeatedly brought into rude
collision with each other, and the apple of strife was the spiritual
authority of the consistory and the right of excommunication.
There was but one celebrated man of the anti-consistoriai party,
Bonnivard, who though burning with zeal for the freedom and
welfare of his fatherland, and daring in his opinions, could yet
understand Calvin and humble his libertine opposers.
Calvin's design extended further than to the present establish-
* This horrible transaction did not take place till a year after Calvin's death.
The unhappy old man was evidently a lunatic ; he had been urged to desire the
poisonous salve, so he said, that he might take vengeance on those who had
taken away his daughter.
54 EXILES AT GENEVA. [CHAP. XII.
ment of his institutions and principles. That which he was
effecting on a small scale, he hoped to accomplish still more
gloriously in the great kingdoms of the world, and thus to ob-
tain for his principles a universal victory. To succeed in this
object however, it was necessary for him to procure allies, to
surround himself with friends, and to form a new Geneva in the
old. The persecutions which still raged, especially in France,
favoured his plan ; fugitives from all parts gathered round his
standard ; among them were faithful, earnest Christians, some
from Italy, others from the Netherlands and Spain, and with
whom conscience availed more than fatherland. New churches
were established ; one of the first was that of the Italians, to
whom the Chapelle des Maccabees was granted, or, according to
others, La Grand Salle du College*. In Notre Dame la Neuve
the service was performed in English, in St. Gervais in Spanish,
and in St. Germain in Flemish.
Calvin, as we have already seen, proclaimed it to be the
bounden duty of the followers of the Gospel to leave their
country, to die or become exiles, rather than incur the guilt of
hypocrisy. Many of his writings, as those against the Nico-
medites, show what were the arguments which he employed for
this purpose. In one of his unpublished letters he exhorts a
whole family to flee, proves why they ought to do so, tells them
what course they should take, and what they had to expect at
Geneva. These exiles found in that city the pestilence, hatred,
and continual strife; but they willingly bore all this, settling
themselves in the neighbourhood of this great man, that they
might cheer themselves by the beams of his noble spirit, and
listen to his sublime discourse. Thus a hundred youths sat at
his feet in the lecture-room and noted down every word which
he spoke, that they might publish his interpretation of the
Scriptures in foreign lands. This was the state of things on the
field of strife. Calvin's present efforts were all directed to obtain
the admission of these worthy people to the rank of citizens,
that, adopting his principles as they did, they might contend
with him in the council for their establishment. The greater
their number, the greater his influence: a majority of votes
was thereby secured to him in the assemblies; but this led the
entire faction of the libertines to persecute these people, or at
to render their lives as miserable as they could; and hence
arose numberless disturbances. Nothing was neglected to pre-
* Picot. T. i. p. 391. Regis. Oct. 13, 1542.
A.D. 1546.] CALVIN AND THE LIBERTINES. 55
vent their acquiring the right of citizenship. They demanded
that they should be forbidden to bear arms ; and it was at one
time feared that they were plotting some murderous design
against them. The exiles on the other hand rejoiced in the
especial protection of the consistory. Galiffe, and the state-
protocol show, that it was not safe for any one to speak insult-
ingly against either the ministers or the refugees ; to do so was
regarded as an offence against God ; and it is known that Calvin,
when he had gained a majority in the council, procured the
enrolment of three hundred new citizens at one time. They
were for the most part Frenchmen, and it was openly declared
that the measure was adopted " for the better protection and
support of the lesser council." A change was now produced in
the spirit of the republic, the state being, according to Calvin's
idea, an oligarchy. Nothing more was to be heard of the
great assembly of the whole body of the citizens, the central
point of primitive freedom ; and they who wished to revive it
were marked as unquiet spirits and disturbers of the people.
Thus the party which consisted of the old Genevese were
brought, though too late, to the conviction that they were over-
powered by intruders, and that they had been guilty of a gross
oversight in committing the conduct of their spiritual affairs to
a stranger. But the new citizens, strong in spirit, retained the
upper hand, and vanquished these modern Canaanites. The
reformation, after a period of fearful contention, was accom-
plished, and a new Calvinistic Geneva brought into existence.
CHAPTER XIII.
FURY OF THE LIBERTINES. ANGER AND SEVERITY OF CALVIN.
AMEAUX, PERRIN, AND GRUET.
It cannot be matter of surprise that the rage of the fanatical
libertines was excited to the highest degree against a man who,
unarmed, and aided only by the sword of his eloquence, could
confound them all. It may be that he occasionally acted with too
much of passion, that he allowed himself to be carried away by
his indignation. The world can form no proper idea of his
zeal, but vast is the debt of gratitude which it owes to Calvin
56
CALVIN AND THE LIBERTINES. [CHAP. XIII.
for his having with such stedfastness resisted that torrent of
infidelity which, but for him, had to this day invaded and op-
pressed us. The libertines gnashed their teeth at him, and cried
aloud that the state was lost. Calvin did not allow himself to
be alarmed ; the more they raged the higher rose his courage.
He let the law take its free course ; and the first councillor, as
well as the simplest burgher, felt his severity and his power.
But the wicked spirit which prevailed would yield neither to
these efforts, nor to the solemn signs of the times ; it was rather
excited to new outbreaks of violence, and Calvin's stern an-
nouncement of the coming vengeance of God was found no false
or empty prophecy. The libertines, who knew that they could
not resist the continual thunder of his attacks., at length threw
off the mask. All were resolved to venture the utmost ; and
from henceforward they desired to be made accountable for their
offences not to the consistory, as the moral tribunal, but to the
council of state. The former however was anxious to preserve
the discipline of which it was the guardian, and which was
sanctified by the Word of God. It appealed therefore to the
council for support; this it obtained, and the spiritual principle
was victorious. The struggle here alluded to is worthy of note
in the history of the church ; it shows the difficulties with which
such a tribunal, especially in a small state, has to contend ; and
we cannot sufficiently admire the firmness of the council.
Calvin pours out his heart on this subject in his introduction
to the commentary on the Psalms, and thus characterizes the
rage of his enemies: — f; If I should describe the course of my
struggles from this period, it would make a long history. But
it affords me no slight consolation, that David preceded me in
these conflicts. For as the Philistines vexed this holy king by
continual wars, but the wickedness and treachery of the faithless
of his own house grieved him still more, so was 1 on all sides
assailed, and had scarcely a moment's rest from outward or in-
ward struggles. But when Satan had made so many efforts to
destroy our church, it came at length to this, that I, unwarlikc
and timid as I am, found myself compelled to oppose my own
body to the murderous assault, and so to ward it off. Five years
long had we to struggle without ceasing for the upholding of
discipline; for these evil-doers were endowed with too great a
degree of power to be easily overcome; and a portion of the
people, perverted by their means, wished only for an unbridled
freedom. To such worthless men, despisers of the holy law, the
A.D. 1546.] CALVIN AND AMEAUX. 57
ruin of the church was a matter of utter indifference, could they
but obtain the liberty to do whatever they desired. Many were
induced by necessity and hunger, some by ambition or by a
shameful desire of gain, to attempt a general overthrow, and to
risk their own ruin as well as ours, rather than be subject to the
laws. Scarcely a single thing, I believe, was left unattempted by
them during this long period which we might not suppose to
have been prepared in the workshop of Satan. Their wretched
designs could only be attended with a shameful disappointment.
A melancholy drama was thus presented to me ; for much as
they deserved all possible punishment, I should have been re-
joiced to see them passing their lives in peace and respectability;
which might have been the case,>iad they not wholly rejected
every kind of prudent admonition."
The trial of Ameaux may be especially mentioned as one of
those which took place at this period, and as affording a pro-
found view of Calvin's determined conduct. Pierre Ameaux, or
Ameaulx, was a member of the council of Two Hundred, whose
wife had been already punished for her libertinism. He was now
in close alliance with some of its most depraved ministers, and had
spoken loudly in a social meeting against both the doctrine and
the person of Calvin, whom he called a mean and wicked man*.
This was mentioned to the council, which felt itself bound, in
remembrance of what Calvin had done for the church and state,
to take serious notice of the matter, and having put Ameaux
into prison to examine him judicially. It was deemed proper
however at the same time to call the council together, that an
inquiry might be entered into, whether there was anything in
Calvin's conduct deserving of reprehension. Several ministers
were summoned on the occasion, and they were desired to state,
in the absence of Calvin himself, their candid opinion respecting
him. They bore the most honourable testimony to the purity
both of his doctrine and his conduct. It was not deemed proper
however to inflict on Ameaux any further punishment than that
of a fine of sixty dollars. He had retracted his complaints against
Calvin, and had declared that he was not in his right senses
when he uttered the objectionable words, adding still further,
that he would for the future show him all becoming respect.
But Calvin now appeared before the council, accompanied by
* Picot, T. ii. p. 410. la the state-protocol of Jan. TJ , 1546, it is said,
" On met Pierre Ameaulx en jugement pour avoir dit que Mr. Calvin prechoit
une fausse doctrine, etoit un tres-mechant liomrac, et n'etoit qu'un Picard."
58 CALVIN AND THE LIBERTINES. [CHAP. XIII.
all the ministers and elders of the church. He complained of
the lenity of the judges, and demanded that the sentence should
be set aside. The process was accordingly renewed, and the
council condemned Ameaux to the following humiliating punish-
ment: he was to pass through the whole city bare-headed,
and with a lighted torch in his hand, and then to kneel down and
openly proclaim his repentance, which was called "Jaire amende
honorable." Calvin may appear in this to have acted with
fanatical severity; but it ought to be considered of what vast
importance it was to him, in one respect at least, to secure a
perfect purity of doctrine. In the present case he identified
himself with his principles, and he founded his proceedings upon
his knowledge of Ameaux and his party, to which Christianity
was hateful, and whose aim it was to destroy it. He was fully
prepared, the attempt having been made against religion itself,
to fall with the respectability of the consistory. If we carefully
observe that the extension of God's kingdom was his only desire,
we must admire the grandeur and freedom of spirit which he
exhibited under these circumstances, and which was sufficient
to raise him above every other consideration, even above the
painful feeling, that he might be suspected of indulging personal
revenge, and thus be in danger of losing many of his followers.
It required moreover no slight degree of courage and determi-
nation to proceed in such a manner against a man who occupied
so high a position as Ameaux. We cannot for a moment impute
to him the vulgar desire of triumphing over an opponent : he
had proved how readily he could forgive, in other circumstances,
and where he was only personally concerned. Could he have
been fairly accused of the love of revenge., or of any dishonour-
able wish, he must have lost for ever the confidence of his party.
As this however was far from being the case, we may conclude
that it was evident to them that he acted according to higher
principles. Could it either be supposed that Ameaux only spoke
in jest, we should scarcely be able to account for the earnestness
and severity which marked the proceedings of the council.
The sentence passed upon Ameaux gave rise to an outbreak
of popular fury in one quarter of the city : but Calvin despised
the tumultuous shouts of the multitude. Two preachers who
had taken the part of Ameaux were deprived of their office : one
of them, Henri de la Mar, was kept some days in prison. All
the wine-shops were strictly closed, and the whole council pro-
ceeded to the disturbed quarter, and ordered a gallows to be
A.D. 1546.] CALVIN AND PERRIN. 59
erected in the Place de St. Gervais. This threat produced the
desired effect : tranquillity was restored, and the sentence was
executed on Ameaux, April 5, 1546.
Calvin's severity increased, and laws of the sternest character
were passed against all offences. The consistory summoned a
great number of licentious persons to appear before it, and sub-
mit to a strict examination of their morals. New edicts wrere
published by the council against luxury*, and the public re-
presentation of a play, 6 The Acts of the Apostles/ after having
been performed ten times with great applause, was forbidden at
the request of the clergy. Calvin describes in a letter to Farelf
his conflict, under these circumstances, with the tumultuous
people. The feeling of popular indignation was still further
increased by an order which forbade the naming of children after
the Roman catholic saints : among the most favourite names
were those of Claudius and Balthazar, with which the people
had associated certain superstitious ideas J. To heap insult on
morality and religion wras the order of the day.
The principal family in the libertine party was that of Faber:
Francis Faber had excited many to struggle for freedom. At
the head however of the party was a man, Amied Perrini§, who,
without any intellectual endowments, had made himself so con-
spicuous by his insolence and extravagant ambition, that Calvin
was accustomed to call him the stage-emperor : his wife was the
daughter of Faber.
A fierce opposer of the strict rule of the church, Perrin stood
forth in 1553 with increased force against Calvin, nor was it till
two years after that he began to shrink before the reformer. Ha-
ving been raised by the voice of the people to the chief military
station in the republic, he had a great show of wrorldly distinc-
tion to aid him in his struggle with Calvin. The latter had in
this respect a more difficult position than Luther, who was pro-
tected by the prudent elector, and lived in the midst of a people
who understood his heroic daring, and encouraged him by their
applause. The laws of the consistory prohibited dancing, the
* Regis. 16 Av. 1543. Ep. lxxvi. Ed. Amst. T. viii. pp. 44-46.
f Epis. lxviii. Ed. Laus. Amst. p. 43.
X Picot, T. ii. pp. 413, 414. Regis. 1546, Av. 27. Chapuis was put in prison
for having persisted in naming his child Claude, which the minister did not
wish, but desired to call him Abraham.
§ Perrin is known under various names. In the old history of Servetus he
is called Amadeus Gorrius ; and in French, Amy Pierre or Ame Perrin. Calvin
gives him the nickname of Csesar Comicus and Ciesar Tragicus.
GO CALVIN AND PERRIN. [CHAP. XIII.
use of ornaments and worldly amusements. But some of the prin-
cipal families had refused to deny themselves these indulgences,
and having kept a festival at Bellerive, they were summoned first
before the council and then before the consistory *. The answers
which they gave at their examination evinced the lively hatred
which they all entertained of the church discipline. Faber was
condemned to three weeks5 imprisonment. He would not how-
ever humble himself before the consistory as Perrin did, but went
to prison exclaiming "Freedom, freedom ! " Calvin's own words
give interest to these circumstances, and show to what lengths he
was led on the principle of moral government.
In a letter to Farelf he says : "The dance has given us more
to do since your departure than I had at first expected. All
who were present on the occasion were called before the con-
sistory, and, with two exceptions (Corneus a syndic, and Perrin),
blasphemed God and belied us with daring effrontery. I burned
with indignation, and spoke with all my strength against this
open contempt of God, declaring at the same time that it was in
vain for them to mock at the holy pledge which we had taken.
They persevered in their scorn. Having thoroughly considered
the matter, I could do no otherwise than adjure them by God
to repent of such wickedness ; at the same time declaring that,
at the peril of my life, I would make the truth known, that they
might not for a moment imagine they had gained anything by
their lies. Francisca Perrin also greatly abused us, because we
are hostile to the Fabers. I answered her as I thought fit, and
as she deserved, asking her whether her family was sacred and
superior to the laws. Her father had been found guilty of one
adultery, we were on the point of proving him guilty of another,
and there was no little talk of a third : her brother had publicly
ridiculed both the council and ourselves. I added lastly that
they might if they pleased build a new city, in which they could
live as they chose, if they did not like to be governed here by
us, as under the yoke of Christ ; but that as long as they were
in Geneva it was useless for them to strive not to obey the laws.
Were there, I further said, as many diadems in the house of
Faber as there were phrenzied heads, this would not alter the
fact that God is the Lord. Perrin himself had in the meantime
fled to Lyons, hoping that the business might be buried in
* IV n in's wife is thus described by Calvin, " uxor est prodiyiosafuria ": and,
" impudenter criminum omnium dpfensionem suscipit." Ep. 70.
f Epis. lxxi. 1510.
A.D. 1547.] CALVIN AND PERRIN. Gl
silence. It was my opinion that they ought to be obliged to
take an oath that they would acknowledge the truth. Corneus
warned them respecting the danger of taking a false oath : they
however not only declared what we desired, but added that they
had danced on the same day at the house of the widow Balthazar.
All were thrown into prison. The syndic afforded a remarkable
instance of coolness ; but having received a severe rebuke on
the part of the consistory, he was deprived of his dignity till he
should evince sincere repentance.* It is reported that Perrin
has come back from Lyons : let him do as he may he will not
escape punishment. Henri, with our consent, was deposed from
his office and committed to prison, but liberated after three days.
It is already matter of public observation that the guilty have
no hope of escaping punishment; and this, because the highest
have not been spared, and my friends have escaped no better
than my enemies. Perrin and his wife are raving in prison :
the widow is almost mad ; the others blush and are silent."
The two parties became more and more enraged against each
other. Calvin's eloquence gave him a decided superiority in the
little republic. On the 24th of July 1547 he wrote to Viret* : —
"I continue to employ my usual severity while labouring to
correct the prevailing vices, and especially those of the young.
The right-thinking tell me of the dangers by which I am sur-
rounded, but I take no heed of this, lest I should seem too
careful for my personal safety. The Lord will provide such
means of escape for me as He sees good/' The families which
belonged to the libertine party took a very formidable position ;
but Calvin remained master of the field, and never ceased to
avail himself of his office as a preacher to attack his opponents.
Somewhat later, that is August 21, 1547^ he states in a letter to
Farel that "letters were daily brought him from Lyons, from
which he learnt that he had been killed ten times over."
" Amadeus is in France ; his wife is with her father, where she
plays the Bacchanal according to her usual fashion. We besought
the council that, if she showed true repentance, all the past might
be forgotten. But this has not occurred, and she is so far gone
as to have cut off all hopes of pardon. I will seek Penthesilea,
when the season for administering the Lord's Supper arrives."
Still worse signs of confusion appeared soon after, and it be-
came more and more evident that the enemies of Calvin would
leave nothing undone to destroy his power. This is shown by
* Epist. lxxx.
G2 CALVIN AND PERRIN. [CHAP. XIII.
an important letter, addressed at this time to Viret, and in which,
not unlike Cicero, he boasts of the courage and eloquence, by
which he had restrained the excited multitude*.
Calvin entertained originally very friendly feelings towards the
captain-general, but this was before they were properly known
to each other. Perrin, as a promoter of the reformation, had
taken his part in recalling Calvin from Strasburg. At a later
period, when they discovered the opposition existing in their
principles, their mutual disfcke became the fiercer from their
former acquaintance. Calvin saw in Perrin only the libertine
Genevese citizen, who, rash, active and frivolous, was on the way
to become a Catiline f. He tried one means after another,
either to win, or at least to bridle, this powerful opponent. En-
treaty, admonition, threats, all were employed in vain, and he
was compelled to resolve on subduing him by force. Whether
Perrin's rashness had led him to form any treacherous design
against the state, cannot be sufficiently proved ; but it is evident
that he was ready to excite arising to overturn the existing order
of things ; and his conduct appears in the highest degree suspi-
cious, when we read that Savoy calculated upon his assistance
in its plans against Geneva. As an idol of the people, Perrin
was all-powerful with the multitude, and the council itself felt
that the pretensions of his family must be humbled. The im-
prisonment of his wife and of his father-in-law inflicted a deep
wound on his pride, and he appeared before the lesser council,
of which he was a member, with bitter complaints and threats.
But his insolent words produced no effect on the council : his
imprisonment was the more resolutely enforced, and the people
suffered it to take place without opposition. He was accused
especially of playing the tyrant, and of entertaining designs
Ep. Ixxxii. Sept. 17, 1547- Calvin here describes the tumultuous cha-
racter of the assembly about the doors of the building where the council met.
" Fearful/' he says, "was the sight. I cast myself into the thickest of the crowd,
[was pulled to and fro by those who wished to save me from harm. I called
Clod to witness that I was come to offer myself to their swords, if they thirsted
f"r blood." lie next speaks of his conflict in the council, but adds/ that the
people shrunk from harming him, "as they would from the murder of a father."
I Many indications of this appear in his letters. In one addressed to Viret
in Jan. 1546, he says, referring to Perrin, " O how I fear that he will at length
render himself intolerable to this free city!" In addressing Pen-in himself, he
speaks to him as to a Judas, and uses the words Qua /acts, far elfins. Ed.
Amst. p. 53. In a letter to Farel, Nov. 27, 1548, Ep. kxxviii. MS. Gen., he
oescribi a bun thus ■ - Eodem die Caesar Comicus noster soccos iterum induit.
Nunc lerocior ahquanto redditus inter histriones suos se thrasouico suo more
jactat."
A.D. 1547.] CALVIN AND PERRIN. 63
against the freedom of his fatherland, having formed the inten-
tion of introducing a body of two hundred soldiers from France,
and quartering them in Geneva*. The whole city busied itself
about this trial : many wished his death, others his liberation.
The lesser council, after consulting the advocates, acquitted him
on the capital charge, but condemned him to lose his offices,
and desired that he should pray both God and the state to pardon
his treasonable speeches. The office of captain-general was for
ever abolished.
Farel and Viret were twice called to Geneva for the purpose of
attempting to reconcile the two parties. They appeared before the
council, and we hear Farel thus defending his friend: — "How,"
he exclaimed, e( can you fail to honour Calvin ? There is not a
man in the world who has warred against Antichrist with such
vigour as he ; there is no one so learned ; and if he have not
spared you, neither has he shrunk from blaming the greatest
men, Luther and Melancthon."
Tranquillity seemed restored, but the ministers were defeated.
Perrin recovered his position, and it was said, indeed, by Calvin's
recommendation ; but the consequence was, that the wicked
spirit of his party soon reached the height of iniquity. His
followers wore a species of cuirass, that they might be known to
each other, and they heaped upon the reformer every species of
abuse. Farel and Viret, who were obliged to return, again
effected a reconciliation between Calvin and Perrin ; but it was
only in appearance. A great many of Calvin's enemies had de-
clared aloud, that it was their dislike to him which kept them
from the Lord's Supper; but he and his brethren put them all
to shame by their bold and resolute preaching of the truth. The
council took their part, and on the 18th of December, 1548, an
amnesty was proposed and settledf. But the events which suc-
ceeded show that Perrin had practised deceit, and had nothing
else in view but to obtain for himself the first place in the state,
and with it the means of accomplishing his designs. In the
following year, 1549, he was first syndic. The old syndics,
* Regis. 25 Juill. 1555. It is said that when the Duke of Alba was told
of Perrin's offer of help, he laughed and replied, that if he had two thousand
men under the walls of* Geneva, and he found any discord in the city, he would
take it without any aid from Ami Perrin.
t In a letter to Viret, Nov. 1548 (MS. Gen.), Calv'm ascribes the restora-
tion of Perrin, whom he speaks of as Comicus Ccesar, to the small number of
the members of the council present. This, it is observed, does not agree with
what is said by Senebier, who states that Calvin assisted in restoring Perrin,
and adds, " II eut la satisfaction chretienne de voir son ennemi reliability. "
CA CRUET THE LIBERTINE. [CHAP. XIII.
contrary to the law, allowed him the highest rank. His power
was thus firmly established, and he again stood opposed to
Calvin as the champion of the evil principle against the good.
Anticipating the narrative of other events, I will here state
that, after another treasonable movement of Perrin's party, the
council at length became calvinistic, and suppressed the worst of
the agitators by force. A sound policy had taught them that it
was impossible to allow two hostile parties to exist together,
without the ruin of the republic. It is possible however that
the council may have made use of the disturbances as a pretence.
The accusations do not appear of sufficient importance ; and the
council, as was too often the case in those times of excitement,
seems to have played with the lives of individuals, and not to
have shrunk from shedding blood on the slightest suspicion, for
the sake of establishing peace. Perrin himself escaped to France,
and was only hung in effigy. Bern especially demanded the an-
nulling of the sentence ; and thus some degree of obscurity must
ever involve the actual criminality of this notorious personage.
Immediately after the apprehension of Faber and Perrin, which
took place on Monday, June 2j, 15473it was discovered that one
of the libertines, the before-named citizen Jacobus Gruet, de-
scended from an old and respectable family, had affixed a libel to
the pulpit in the high church of St. Peter. This paper contained
an expression of hatred against the established discipline, and a
threatening intimation that a plan was laid to annihilate the
champions of the church party by murder.
The judicial proceeding against Gruet is important as a prelude
to that of Servetus. It exhibits the principles of the council,
the prevailing laws of the city, and at the same time the connec-
tion between the spiritual and the political libertines. The ac-
cusation brought against Servetus was purely religious, whereas
in that against Gruet the religious was mingled with the political,
and presented a more awful specimen of unbelief. We will leave
Calvin himself to give an account of this affair.
Addressing Yiret*,he says, "We must now contend in earnest."
Then having alluded to the wife of the stage hero, and to her
rage against the spiritual rule which had bridled her love of
dancing, he continues: — "The council committed her to close
confinement. She fled. The next day a paper was found affixed
to the pulpit, threatening us with death if we did not remain
silent. The council, greatly moved by such proceedings, have
* Epis. lxxvii. July 11, 1547.
A.D. 1547.] GRUET THE LIBERTINE. G5
given command to investigate thoroughly the nature of the con-
spiracy. As the suspicion of many rests on Gruet, he has been
apprehended, but the hand-writing does not agree with his. A
search however having been made among his papers, several
others were found of a not less guilty character, one of which
was an intended address to the people on the day of assembly,
and in which he endeavoured to prove that that only ought to
be punished by the laws which might appear injurious to the
state. There was the danger, he argued, that whilst the city
was under the government of a single melancholy man (Calvin),
an insurrection might be excited, and the city might thus be
deprived of thousands of its inhabitants. Two sides were written
in Latin, and in these he made a mock of Scripture altogether,
and abused the Saviour. Immortality he called a dream and a
fable, and struck at the very root of all religion. I do not be-
lieve that he is the author of this paper, but it is in his hand-
writing, and the process therefore is carried on. It is possible
that he may have employed his own wit to reduce to a whole
that which he has heard from others." Calvin here recognised
the doctrine of that satanic association founded by the spiritual
libertines.
Some circumstances may be mentioned which serve to throw
light on the origin of Gruet's wrath. In order to make his
freedom of opinion publicly known, he had introduced a part of
the Bernese costume, the people of Bern being opposed to Cal-
vin and the council*. This luxurious dress was immediately
prohibited, and the compulsion thus exercised inspired the great
champion of freedom with the most violent indignation. The
preachers exhibited little moderation towards their opponents.
Cop, a bold energetic minister, had called the Genevese ladies of
the libertine party, and who were in the habit of attending thea-
trical representations, harlots. Thus too Abel Poupin de-
scribed Faber as a hound, and Calvin, Gruet as " balaufre"
Gruet, who felt his strength, was greatly embittered to see his
friends humbled, and obliged to bend the knee before the con-
sistory. The words of the libel were t? "You and yours shall
gain little by your measures ; if you do not take yourselves away,
no one shall save you from destruction ; you shall curse the
hour when you forsook your monkhood. Warning should have
been given before, that the devil and his legions were come
* "Les hauts dc chausses chaples aux genoux."
t Galiffe, Not. Gen. Ait. Gruet.
VOL. IT. F
66 GRUET THE LIBERTINE. [CHAP. XIII.
hither to ruin everything. But though we have been patient
for a time, revenge will be had at last. Defend yourselves, or
you will share the fate of Verle of Freiburg *. We do not wish
to have so many masters here. Mark well what I say."
Suspicion must have been already directed towards Gruet ;
he would not otherwise have been so immediately accused in
the present instance. As a rash, enterprising man, occupying
a conspicuous place in his party, he must have betrayed his anti-
christian sentiments in a thousand ways to the eye of an ob-
server like Calvin. The process was begun, attended as it seems
with some agitation. According to established usage, the ac-
cuser was to be imprisoned with the accused ; but in this case
the whole council must have gone to prison, the charge being
one of high-treason, and as such could be brought by no other
body. Gruet however was subjected to the torture morning
and evening during a whole month : he bore his sufferings
firmly, and without betraying one of his confederates, of whom
he must have had many.
In a letter to P. de Bourg, he says of Calvin, whom he names
" Episcopum Asculanensem/5 " He is a great hypocrite, who
would fain be worshiped himself, while he robs our holy father
the pope of the honour due to him. His audacity is so great
that he declares he will make even kings and emperors tremble."
In another letter he accuses him of trifling with holy things.
It is worthy of remark, that a copy of the work against the Ana-
baptists and libertines was found in his house : he had written
on the margin " toutes folies" which shows plainly that he had
employed himself on the subject, and felt that he was aimed at
in the passage which he had marked.
On the 9th of July he confessed that he had been guilty of
affixing the threatening placard to the pulpit. On the 12th he
repeated this confession, with some alterations : he also stated
that the writings found in his house were his own composition,
and prayed with tears that he might be at once led to execution.
We cannot repress a sigh, that the rude period which we are
contemplating would not allow men to discover, that intolerance
as hateful as blasphemy, and the actual infliction of torture
I a crime as uttering a threat of murder. But in the
pre e the state was a principal actor: it would therefore
be unjust to attribute Gruet5 s death solely to the religious go-
vernment of Geneva, as if it had been effected simply through
* A gentleman who had been murdered.
A.D. 1547.] EXECUTION OF GRUET. 6*J
the hatred of his spiritual opponents. His condemnation must
have taken place, had Calvin not been in Geneva. The latter
had no doubt rightly judged his character, although it was not
till after his death that his worst crime came to light, and that
his punishment appeared proportioned to his offence. But no-
thing can be more ridiculous than the clamour raised at the men-
tion of Gruet's torture, as if Calvin was the author of its in-
fliction. Not the slightest evidence exists in history that such
was the case, while it is well known that no important trial took
place in those times, in any part of the world, without the appli-
cation of the rack. In the proceedings carried on against mere
heretics, as in the trials of Servetus and Gentilis, no mention is
made of torture ; but it would be contrary to all historical prin-
ciples to judge Calvin and his times by the rule of modern opi-
nion. With equal right, and with the same consequences, it
might be objected against him that he did not wear a peruke
a la Louis XIV., or found his decisions according to the Code
Napoleon. Calvin speaks on these things with great simplicity
and earnestness in his letters, written about this time, to Bour-
gogne, and calls the libertines young people whom he must
constrain and bridle, and thus do them good against their own
will*.
Gruet was brought to the scaffold July 26, 1547. The sen-
tence, which was read aloud to him, purported, that he had in-
sulted religion, and had declared that the laws, both divine and
human, were but the invention of man; that he had written
blasphemous and obscene verses, and defended the grossest
licentiousness ; and that he had thereby endeavoured to over-
turn the institutions of the church, and lessen the authority of
the consistory. It was further added, that he had threatened
the reformers and the clergy, and had spoken with especial dis-
respect of Calvin ; that he had written letters to excite the
French court and the monarch against him ; and lastly, that he
had threatened even the council itself.
It is to be observed, that his unchristian sentiments and im-
morality were first noticed, and that then followed his resist-
ance to the consistory, and in the third place his threatening of
the council. But in a republic, where religion was so closely
bound up with the political government, every attempt against
the former must have been viewed as equally directed against
the latter, which hence must have incurred the charge of into-
* July 14, 1547.
F2
68 CALVIN AND THE LIBERTINES. [CHAP. XIII.
lerance whenever it inflicted temporal punishment. As Gruet's
resistance was directed against the moral institutions of the state,
so was that of Servetus against its principal doctrine, which, as
the foundation of its religion and its power was of still greater
importance, and demanded a sterner sacrifice. With religion
must the republic flourish or be overthrown.
It is really inspiriting to hear how Calvin stormed in his ser-
mons against the opposite party, while at the same time he
laboured to convert them. " I am ashamed," says he, " to
preach the Word here among you, where such horrible disorders
are taking place ; and were I to follow my inclination, I should
pray God to take me from this world. I would not live three
days amid the vanities by which I am surrounded. And shall
we still boast that we have established a reformation ! Not ser-
vants of God, our judges might be blind, for they may feel our
worthlessness with their hands. I know not indeed whether
God may not send the executioner among us, refusing as we do
to hear the admonitions of his mouth : yea, there is reason to
fear that he is preparing to raise his armed hand. But this is
not said to excite resistance against him, but that we may con-
fess our misery, and no longer harden ourselves in sin. He has
called us to repentance : let us then embrace both his pro-
mises and his threats ; let those who serve the state fulfil their
duties now with more faithfulness ; let the clergy labour more
diligently to cleanse the churches of their impurity ; let every
one look to his own house ; from our houses let us look to our-
selves, and sanctify ourselves, that when we celebrate the Lord's
Supper, we may be more and more established in his grace, and
be engrafted into his body, so that we may live in Him and He
in us, and that we may be able to boast ourselves the children of
God."
Still more striking is the deep religious earnestness which
breathes in the statement put forth by him in the year 1550, on
the vicious proceedings of Gruet : — " Not only did he oppose
himself to our holy religion, but he poured forth such blasphe-
mies that they make the hair stand on end. These things must
tend to bring a curse upon the whole land : all therefore whose
consciences are awake will feel the necessity of praying God to
forgive this abuse of his name amongst us. The council ought
again to declare aloud that this blasphemer has been justly con-
demned, that the wrath of God may be averted from the city
which has harboured such wickedness; that the associates of
a.d. 1547.] calvin's troubles. G(J
this reprobate and more than devilish sect may have an exam-
ple of vengeance before their eyes, and that thereby the months
of those may be shut who would treat these crimes with levity."
Gruet's book was cast into the fire by the common hangman, in
the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost. The
Scriptures lay open before the people, and the ceremony took
place at the door of the house, in the Bourg de Foux, where he
had dwelt.
The Gospel thus gained a victory over its enemies ; in the
same manner as in Germany freedom triumphed when Luther
burnt the pope's bull, and the papal decrees.
CHAPTER XIV.
INSULTS HEAPED ON CALVIN. HIS RESOLUTION, INWARD
PEACE, AND CONSOLATION IN FRIENDSHIP. — VIRET.
The enemies of Calvin left nothing untried to injure or afflict
him : he was exposed to insult, not only in the council, but in
the open street. He says, in reference to this period, that he
expected to be killed ; and had his enemies succeeded, this would
in all probability have been the case. Beza observes, among
other things, that they gave the name of Calvin to their dogs ;
others converted it into Cain, the fratricide, in allusion to the
execution of Gruet*. But he allowed nothing to rob him of
his courage or his peace : he says to Viret, " I awaited tran-
quilly what my enemies might do ; they tried every means to
overthrow me ; but, on the one side, I would take no notice of
their insults ; and, on the other, I let them understand that I
regarded all their machinations with contempt. Had they dis-
covered a single indication of fear in me, they would have sup-
posed they had conquered. There is certainly nothing better
* To Viret, Feb. 12, 1545. " I must continue as ever to fight in darkness
with hypocrisy." And further, Dec. 1547, he says emphatically, "Nunc
redeo ex Senatu. Multa dixi, sed canitur surdis fabula : Dominus illis mentem
restituat !" In the same month he again said, " that he knew not what he
should do, but that he certainly could not much longer endure the conduct of
such a people."
yo calvin's inward peace. [chap, xiv,
calculated to disappoint their aim, or to encourage the good to
persevere, than my resolution/'
Even the council was in many instances opposed to Calvin,
and acted so as to increase his difficulties : as for example in re-
gard to the printing of his works*. The following circumstances
however gave rise to a still more serious persecution against
him. When the new syndics, and among them his opponent
Amadeus Perrin, were chosen in 1545, Calvin wrote to Viret
respecting these persons. The letter was lost, and Viret' s ser-
vant, into whose hands it fell, gave it to the syndics. Troillet
translated it into French, and made it public. As the council
was at that time unfavourably disposed towards Calvin, it ex-
cited complaints against him, and he was accused of having
written, that the Genevese desired to be ruled without God,
which was to slander the whole council. It might be well
enough for him to assail his opponents in the pulpit, but he had
no right to abuse them in his private letters. Calvin wrote
hereupon to Farel, August 10, 1548, "As far as lean gather
from common report, my letters have been given to them. The
worst passage in these letters is this : — i Our people here, under
the mask of Christians, wish to govern without Christ.' They
regard this as an arrow directed against themselves. But I
should readily endure any kind of death if it could tend to the
defence of the truth. They are ashamed however to show these
letters, of which they have gained possession by cunning, and
they know well enough that I am in a position to endure many
insults unmoved." (August 20, 1548). " Trusting to the tes-
timony of my conscience, I fear no assault, for what can they
inflict upon me worse than death?"
His enemies felt confident that they had him now in their
powerf; and the affair would have been carried to extremities
could they have established the accusation against him. But
his resolute and prudent conduct gained the victory. Although
lie supposed that he had sufficiently explained J the circum-
stance to the council, showing that he had only passed judge-
ment on his opponents in a private letter, and as a Christian,
without inflicting any public injury upon them, yet the council
reproved him, and this was the cause why Farel and Viret came
to Geneva to afford him the support of their influence.
ft is well for us, after contemplating his struggle with the
* To Farel, 1548, MS. Gen. \ To Viret, Sept. 20, 1548.
{ Galiffe, Not. Gen. p. 528.
a.d. 1548.] calvin's inward peace. 71
outward world, to penetrate into the soul of this same man,
armed as he was by God, and so living as it were with him, to
learn to imitate his firmness. In an age characteristically want-
ing in force, it is elevating and strengthening to associate with
noble minds ; not only to survey with their eagle-like glance the
divine plan, but to share with them the higher impulses of the
spirit, grounded upon a holier sense of duty. Calvin's life was
not rich in great visible circumstances, but the contrary was the
case as to his inner conflicts, thoughts and works. We have
not in him the joyous outbreaks and noble instances of proud
defiance displayed by Luther, but he ever exhibited the perse-
vering resolution and the truth, even to death, which win the
crown of life.
It is important for the display of the fine inner life of Calvin, to
read how greatly he was distressed, under present circumstances,
at the approach of the season for celebrating the Lord's Supper.
He says, " The coming Sunday is the day for administering the
sacrament. You can easily imagine with what anxiety I am
oppressed. Would that it could be celebrated in my absence,
even under the condition that I should come creeping to you
on my hands and knees*!" Thus we see Calvin contrasted with
men who, according to his conviction, often approached the
table of the Lord with hypocrisy ; while he only sought it under
the influence of deep feeling, and an immoveable faith in the
righteousness of God, and in the presence of Christ in the sacra-
ment. He frequently indeed yielded himself to the spirit of
the Old Testament, but communion with Christ in the sacra-
ment wras the middle-point of his life. None of these struggles
could affect him. During the whole of this turbulent period he
was supported by a loftier principle, which kept him firm, and
imparted to him that wise, determined will which nothing could
bow. A more than human strength and confidence in this re-
spect characterized his position. Those who study the lives of
men celebrated in the world, will find that such men feel them-
selves impelled to action in a manner not to be explained by an
ordinary understanding. It was so with Calvin, and it is only
by this consideration that we can throw any light upon his con-
duct. He had no self-interest to promote, when he defied those
who opposed him, and stood exposed to the hatred of half the
world. How gladly would he have retreated and sought re-
pose ! What was it which kept him to his post, except the
* Ep. 70. To Farel, Sept. 1, 1546.
/2 calvin's inward peace. [chap. xiv.
feeling that he had to fulfil a higher will than his own ? What
else could have moved him to employ the severest methods to
gain his end, but the consciousness that the interests of truth
could only be effectually supported by such means ? This con-
viction gave him confidence, joy, and untiring patience, even
when he saw himself mistaken by his friends and exposed to
their censures*. It was from his entire resignation to the divine
will that he drew consolation and life, and thus he says, " I
bring my heart as an offering and gift to the Lord ; I subject
my bound and vanquished soul to the obedience of God." In
the same humble spirit he adds, that his sufferings and conflicts
were far less than those of other servants of the Lord,— that his
struggles were but a jest.
" It is not worth the trouble," he says, writing to France, " to
vex you. Far different were the anxieties endured by Moses
and the prophets, the leaders of God's people. Such trials are
necessary for us." A little afterwards he expresses the same
joyous feeling. Moses rose to his mind, and rightly, for, like
the lawgiver, Calvin led a new people to the Lord, triumphing
over a thousand dangers. His address to Farel is very noble°
"With respect to your exhortation, that I and my brethren
should persevere with unbroken resolution, neither dangers nor
troubles lessen my courage. But since I know not sometimes
in this confusion where to look for counsel, I wish that God
would allow me to depart. I can easily understand that you
will say this is a foolish wish. But did not Moses, that glorious
example of patience, complain of the burden which seemed to
lie too heavily upon him ? I am indeed assailed to a certain de-
gree by such thoughts, but I do not encourage them." Certain
it is, that while all his friends trembled more and more for him,
and while the whole city was raging against him, he alone en-
joyed profound tranquillity of soul. All that he says gives
proof of this. At a moment full of disquietude for many he
thus speaks :-« The two hundred are deliberating. I am kept
in a slate of expectation, that I may look for rest in the Lord
alone. If we serve Him with a good conscience, we can never
avoid the rage of those who would fain involve everything in
nun. But it will always be to us a strong tower that we hold
last by the Lord." At the same time he also says, « I am con-
plain to vTret ot! ^ ?P' ^ "There ar0 somc' l know' **° com-
MmmmSS^USS^1 a,"-not awarc °fwhat Viret himself thinks,
aspect that he tears I am giving too much room to my zeal."
A.D. 1548.] CALVIN AND HIS FRIENDS. 7$
vinced, in the first place, that God shields us ; and in the next,
that when it pleases Him to expose us to suffering, to die for
Him will be my deliverance. The present time warns us more
than ever to be prepared to receive from God whatever He may
send us. My apprehensions, as far as they concern my own
danger, hinder me not from sleeping tranquilly. While I am
pursuing the path which He prescribes me, I learn how to cast
the greater part of my cares, if not all, upon Him."
Altogether, in this respect, like Luther, God was his strong
tower. Like him he exhibited the courage which had faith for
its firm foundation ; but he was not so happy as Luther, who,
surrounded by powerful friends, could find a refuge in the for-
tress of Sickingen, Schaumburg and others. Geneva had the
Savoy and French territory at its very gates, and was connected
only by the lake with the Swiss cantons, but half of which had
as yet received the reformation. The little republic lay like a
rock in the sea, and this rock was occupied by parties and trea-
chery. How often might the reformer utter the words of the
prophet, those words which he so continually repeated when he
was dying, u O that I had the wings of the dove!" His eye
rested upon the distant Alps, which stretched before him tran-
quilly, eternally glistering; he remembered the rock of God's
strength, and raised his thoughts to Heaven. " I lift up mine
eyes towards the hills," he says, " but my help cometh from the
Lord."
In contrast to the fierce, hostile commotions of which we
have spoken, is the deep affection of Calvin for his friends, and
his lively care for them, comforting and active to the uttermost
even in the midst of those stormy times. The dedications which
he wrote at this period show that he sought consolation in friend-
ship, and gladly reverted in thought to the tranquil days of his
childhood and youth. There is a loftiness of expression in the
letters which he addressed to John Sturm in Strasburg. They
are those of a man who felt himself safe above the ruins of the
world. " Let it even be that entire destruction awaits us, or
rather that the Lord, overturning the present system, and esta-
blishing his heavenly kingdom, has determined to gather toge-
ther those who are now unhappily dispersed, and are wandering
to and fro, still should we preserve with true constancy that
friendship whose band is holy."
As Viret was numbered among the friends dearest to his heart,
he extended his affection to those who were related to Viret, and
74 CALVIN AND VIRET. [CHAP. XIV.
he thus expresses the feelings of his soul in a letter addressed to
him in March 1545: — "We greet you with your wife, whose
health we have commended to God. Be assured that we are as
anxious about her as if she were our own wife or daughter.
May the Lord uphold and strengthen you with the consolations
of his spirit." Again he writes : — " Could you really suppose
that I would refuse you anything which you are anxious that I
should grant*?"
In respect to vigour of mind and habits of business, Calvin
seems to have estimated Viret even more highly than Farel.
But the heart of the latter was more closely united to Calvin,
and their respect for each other increased with their mutual
labours. According to the conviction common to both, each
was the complement, the completion of the other. Farel was
accustomed to compare Calvin to Moses. Although much older
than Calvin, he undertook nothing without consulting him ; and
when he himself took the part of an adviser, he jested, and
prayed Calvin to suffer this for friendship's sakef.
When Viret's wife fell sick, Calvin manifested the most affec-
tionate concern, and sent him a physician. After her death he
wrote to him, saying, " Come, not only for the sake of lessening
your present grief, but to obtain some respite from all other dis-
tresses. Do not fear that I should impose any new burden upon
you ; my only care would be to let you be quiet, according to
your own wish. If any one should prove troublesome to you, I
will come to your relief. The brethren promise you what I do.
I will even obtain from the citizens what you wish. I know not
how sufficiently to execrate the wretches who have spread the
report of your death. Nothing could be more opportune than
your letter. In spite of what was said respecting your death,
mention having been made of poison, Textor prepared to set off
at once for the place on horseback. A great many of the bre-
thren assembled in my house, all in great anxiety and affliction.
As soon however as your letter came to sight, such was the
storm of joy which succeeded, that we were scarcely masters of
ourselves. It is well that we had not had a night of sorrow. I
should not have been able to endure the contrast. But why do
I detain you, and not rather urge you to hasten hither with all
possible speed ? Farewell, my brother and dearest friend \"
* March, 1545, MS. Cicn.
f Sept. 7, 1555, Ed. Amst. p. 234, Ep. 211, Ed. Laus. Schmidt, Etudes
sur Farel, p. 57.
A.D. 1548.] CALVIN AND SERVETUS. 75
When Calvin had to endure the same grief, Viret comforted
him in his turn. Bucer, who knew Calvin's wife, and was
united with them both in the strictest bonds of friendship, ex-
pressed at the beginning of the year 1549, his earnest desire for
their happiness. It is evident that they all feared that anxiety,
and the death of his wife, might break JCalvin's strength*. " I
fervently pray to God that He may restore your wife, and this
I do rather for the church of Christ than for you, that you may
be able still to do for it, and with a lighter and more cheerful
heart, what you are now doing. My brethren and my wife
unite in praying that you may have all that can be wished for,
both in the year just commenced and in all eternity." Calvin's
wife was soon after this called to the Lord. He now stood
alone in the storm and in the conflict with half the world, but
his soul remained firm as ever. Farel and Viret manifested
their care for him during his domestic afflictions f.
CHAPTER XV.
EFFORTS TO RE-ESTABLISH PEACE. STRUGGLE ON BEHALF
OF A GREAT CHURCH UNION. AGREEMENT OF THE ZU-
RICHERS ON THE LORD'S SUPPER.
Notwithstanding his zeal, and the bursts of ardour which he
often exhibited, Calvin lost none of the tranquillity and mode-
ration proper to his character. As far as possible he avoided
strife : this is shown by his conduct towards Servetus, when they
were now again brought into collision. In the midst of the
agitation which we have described, Servetus, who had been
living in France as a physician, and had taken part in the most
fanatical projects of reformation, was desirous of forming a league
with Calvin, from the conviction that the support of so great a
mind might enable him to accomplish his designs. Calvin had
refused him, and at length, when Servetus continued to reproach
him, he remained silent. Servetus now attacked Viret. Cal-
vin, who thoroughly knew the man, was resolved to have no
* Ep. 96, Jan. 9, 1549.
f Ep. 102 (Ed. Amst. p. 52,), April 10, 1549-
76 CALVIN AND THE SWISS CHURCHES. [CHAP. XV.
further communication with him, and was anxious to avoid him.
This appears from a passage in a letter to Viret : — « I think you
have already seen the answer which I sent Servetus. I have
resolved to have no further contest with this perverse, stiff-
necked, heretical man. It is certainly right in this case to fol-
low the precept of the apostle Paul. He now attacks you, and
it behoves you to consider how far it will be prudent for you to
oppose his folly : for my part he shall force nothing further
from me." Calvin sought peace : both the office imposed upon
him by God and his own heart led him to desire to reconcile
the jarring spirits of his age, and to secure the permanency of
that which he had accomplished. Among all these storms
raging without, his mind was occupied with a great and exten-
sive plan, to fix the little republic of Geneva on a firm and tran-
quil basis. His thoughts were constantly directed to a system
of general church polity, and to the establishment of the faith
by a common confession. I have already spoken of his efforts
to accomplish this object, and have remarked the desire ex-
pressed in his work on the Lord's Supper, to subdue the vio-
lence of hostile parties. His soul contemplated the unity of the
entire evangelical church in Christ, its head and centre.
It was in conformity with these feelings that he now pro-
moted, by all the means in his power, the Zurich confederacy,
or the union of the French reformed party with that of Switzer-
land. This was the first step towards the accomplishment of
his greater plan. Calvin, agreeing almost entirely with Melanc-
thon, had been recognized even by Luther as a fellow-believer.
The last proceeding of the German reformer was a matter of
mere private concern, and had no dogmatic importance. Thus
even his own immediate followers suffered him to indulge his
passion, without mingling in the strife. Calvin could therefore
reasonably entertain the hope, after Luther's death, that, with
the help of Melancthon, he might mediate successfully in pro-
moting a union between Germany and Switzerland. Had this
been really accomplished, the church would have formed one
great and harmonious whole, and Calvin would have repaired
by Ins intervention, what Luther's violence had marred. But
as an essential to this union, the Swiss must have confessed the
spiritual, nal? substantial presence of Christ in the sacrament.
Most of them indeed had already adopted this doctrine, but from
regard to Zwmgli they refrained from openly confessing it, and
this, though Zwingli himself had latterly represented the sub-
A.D. 1548.] CALVIN AND BULL1NGER. 77
ject with more force and life than he had done in the earlier part
of his career.
Great diversity of opinion however prevailed on this subject
in the church at Bern. Yiret was involved in a dispute with
Sulzer; and opinion fluctuated between the old, one-sided, abs-
tract view of the understanding, and the more concrete, living
one supported by Calvin. Both he and Viret were accused at
Zurich of having, according to report, dissented from the Swiss
Confession and inclined to Lutheranism : but the contrary was
known to be the case when Farel and Calvin visited Zurich in
1548. The former, greatly beloved there for his zeal and piety,
was able to accomplish much. He was still, as ever, a fervent
missionary for the things of the Lord, so unwearied that he
could even exhort Calvin himself to action. They worked toge-
ther unceasingly to calm the spirit of controversy which had
arisen among individuals*.
The Consensus Tigurinus, which, had it not been for the fool-
ish intervention of the Lutheran preacher Westphoal in Ham-
burg, and that of other, for the most part vain, followers of
Luther, would have effected by degrees a general union in the
whole protestant church, was completed in 1549-f. Calvin had
rightly felt that he must unite with Bullinger, the most power-
ful and influential man in that part of the church, and use every
means to remove the old distrust. Hence there was commenced
a correspondence, characteristic of both parties. That the under-
taking which had already engaged so much of Calvin's attention,
as his letters to Bullinger from Strasburg show, could not be an
easy one, after all that had taken place, appears evident from a
letter written to Viret in April 1548. He there complains that
the Zurichers were so perverse, that they were ready to admit
the most slanderous reports. v His good sense, foresight and in-
tegrity, as well as the difficulties which he had to encounter, will
be seen by some extracts which we will give from the letters
which he wrote at this period, and in which he speaks openly of
the matters in hand. Thus he says to Bullinger, March 1,
1548 : — " Although I am conscious in myself of a more inward
union with Christ in the sacrament than you express in your
* Calvin had shortly before this warned some of the ministers at Bern of
the evils which continued strife would produce : — " Malum proculdubio in dies
gliscet et crescet, nisi brevi tollatur."
t Salig. Hist. Augs. Confes. T. ii. p. 1076. Plank, Protest. Lehrbegriff, B.
vi. p. 24.
78 CALVIN AXD BULLIXGER. [CHAP. XV.
words, yet this ought not to prevent our having the same Christ,
or our being one in Him. It is only perhaps through this in-
ward consensus that we ean unite with each other. I have
always loved the greatest candour : I cannot endure subtleties,
and the praise of clearness is given me by those who object to
others on account of their obscurity. Cunning therefore can
never be laid to my charge. I have never employed dissimula-
tion to please men, and my mode of teaching is too simple to
give rise to suspicion, and too full and explicit to be accused of
darkness. If I do not content others by such means, let me be
pardoned for honestly seeking to render back, in all simplicity
and truth, that which I have received. I therefore felt no little
surprise, when I was lately at Basel, to hear it stated by a friend,
that you have complained that I have taught differently in my
commentaries to what I promised you. I at once answered, and
truly, that I spoke no otherwise at Zurich than at Geneva. But
I ascribe all this rather to some error ; for why should I now,
without any necessity for so doing, alter my doctrines or prin-
ciples? If however I cannot convince men of this, I will re-
main content with knowing myself that God is witness to the
truth of what I say."
Thus also in the following letter he seeks to win Bullinger by
his gentleness : — " We are anxious to come to a friendly under-
standing with you. It is no mere theatrical affair, which would
be as disagreeable to you as to me, that we propose. I say no-
thing about Farel, whose mind, as you well know, shrinks with
disgust from every kind of ostentation. That which we wish is
to speak with you in a friendly way on the subject about which
we so little agree. This is the best mode among brethren, and,
if I do not greatly err, that which we should find the most pro-
fitable. In respect to the question of the sacraments, we do not
confine the grace of God to them, nor do we commit to them
the office and power of the Holy Spirit, or ascribe to them the
securing of salvation. We plainly acknowledge that God alone
works by the sacraments ; all which is efficacious belongs to the
Holy Spirit, and its efficacy is seen only in the elect. In no
other way do we teach that the sacraments can help us, but as
they may lead us by the hand to Christ, and that we may seek
in Him the fountain of all good things. I do not see indeed
what you can wish for more in this doctrine, which shows that
salvation is to be sought in Christ alone ; that God only perfects
and applies the mystery, and that salvation is enjoyed only by
A.D. 1549.] CALVIN AND THE SWISS CHURCHES. 79
the secret working of the Spirit. We teach that the sacraments
are the instruments of the grace of God."
This is followed by a remarkably admirable letter, containing
a developed view of the Calvinistic doctrine of the Lord's Sup-
per. Calvin took the middle path, avoiding all the excesses of
Lutheranism, but at the same time showing the followers of
Zwingli that they could receive no other faith. He declares
aloud his reverence both for that reformer and for (Ecolampa-
dius, but without entering into particulars, there being too great
an interval between them and him. Bucer's Apology follows.
He subscribed the Confession, and Calvin could easily under-
stand him. To the Swiss he says : — " Christ is present with us
under every circumstance. If we seek Him in those earthly
elements, it is not permitted us to accuse Him of deception ; but
this is actually done, if we do not feel that the truth is connected
with the sign, it being allowed that the sign by itself is useless.
If now, for a brief explanation of the contents of the sacrament,
we shortly answer, that we are partakers of Christ, that He may
dwell in us and we in Him, and that we may be sharers of all
his glory, what is there, I ask, in these words, dark or unrea-
sonable ? especially if we distinctly exclude those dreams and
fancies which so easily enter the mind. And yet we are cen-
sured as if we had fallen from the pure and simple doctrine of
the Gospel."
We here see that Calvin was thoroughly occupied with the
thought of reconciling the Swiss by a method of his own. They
had been violently separated from communion with the German
protestants by Luther's rough and intolerant treatment, and
were thus driven to a still greater one-sidedness of opinion.
Calvin hoped to correct this by the inculcation of higher views,
which should not only stretch far above their one-sidedness, but
bring into clearer display the truth, held partially by both.
Everything seemed to promise peace when the year 1549
commenced. The Lord mingled joy and sorrow in Calvin's life
this year. At Geneva the faction of the libertines, which had
caused him so much distress, was for the moment suppressed.
The Saxon churches however were disunited on the question, as
to what ought to be the conduct of a Christian in matters indif-
ferent, a question which, like many others of a similar kind, had
its origin with the Interim. Calvin's opinion was asked, and
he gave it freely. Melancthon had been openly accused of
80 SYNOD AT BERN. [CHAP. XV.
having acted with too much gentleness or weakness in this mat-
ter. Calvin admonished him, but he said at a later period that
he had erred, and that injustice had been done this great man.
It was not at that time clearly seen with what an evil spirit the
whole multitude of the Flacianer, who subsequently created such
commotion in the church, were possessed. Such was their
phrenzied conduct, that, as Beza expresses it, they seemed to be
bribed by the pope himself. But the deep wounds thus in-
flicted upon the church in Germany, were healed by the won-
derful mercy of the Lord, exhibited towards the churches of
Switzerland.
A synod was held at Bern, March 19, 1549. All the Ger-
man and French ministers of the canton were present on the
occasion. The Genevese sent a letter to the meeting. Calvin
employed this opportunity to win the Bernese by words of re-
conciliation, and thus to lay the foundation of union on the
question of the sacrament. "That we offer, uncalled for, a
statement of our views on the sacraments, requires some brief
apology, though no particular preface can be needed in address-
ing you on so important a subject. Since the venerable coun-
cil has called you together, for other causes indeed, but also to
consult for the peace of the church, whose surest bond of union
is agreement in doctrine, it is very probable that mention may
be made of the sacraments, a subject long agitated in Bern.
Though no exposition therefore of the doctrine has been asked
of us, we have yet considered it our duty to state to you what
we all with one spirit acknowledge, and with one mouth con-
fess. As it is the same Christ whom we all preach, the same
Gospel which we all own, and as we are members of the same
body, the church, and exercise the same office, no difference in
the temporal rule to which we are subject must either disturb
the unity of our faith, or mar the blessings of this holy union,
established and sanctified under the auspices of Christ. Nor
ought the influence of neighbourhood, which among the chil-
dren of this world is so powerful a cause of union, to be of less
value among us. We are so mixed up together that locality
even ought to keep us united : to this may be added the treaty
between the two cities : ministers from among us are employed
in the territory of Bern, and we again have pastors in the Ge-
neva churches from your canton. It is of vast importance there-
fore, both for you and for us, that you should know what form
A. D. 1519.] CALVIN AND BULLINGER. SI
of doctrine we follow. To speak of nothing else, we shall at
least free ourselves by this proceeding from no slight degree of
suspicion."
Twenty articles follow. It was Calvin's main design in these,
to show, that the sacraments ought by no means to be regarded
as empty signs. He was anxious to give new life to the cold
doctrine of the Swiss, and to make them see that they could not
properly persevere in holding the early opinion of Zwingli, but
ought rather to reconsider it as he himself had done. These
articles form the groundwork of the Zurich union, as appears
from their twenty-six articles, which exhibit a still fuller de-
velopment of the same ideas.
At the end of May, after the death of his wife, Calvin sud-
denly roused himself, proceeded to Neuchatel, took his friend
Farel with him, and both hastened in the fine spring weather
through the beautiful country to Zurich. Thus, rising superior
to earthly sorrow, Calvin felt himself strengthened by the
thought, that he might now at length hope to establish a union
of opinion on the subject of Christ's presence in the sacrament.
To Bullinger, who sent him an invitation, he had written : —
" Nothing could be more agreeable to me : it has also contri-
buted to lighten my domestic sorrow, which so greatly bowed
me down." The world ought to be taught how closely united
Christians are who love the truth. " By prudence and love,"
Farel had said, " we shall conquer." And he was not deceived.
The conference of the ministers continued several days, in the
presence of the civic council; and the well-known formulary was
drawn up, which all the Helvetic and Rhaetian churches, with
those of the Grisons, subscribed ; and by which Bullinger and
Calvin, and the churches of Geneva and Zurich, were united in
the strictest alliance. Calvin wrote to Bullinger on the first of
August respecting the conference, and sent him the Consensus
for his signature. He received it back on the thirtieth, and the
hope which Beza then expressed, that the union thus effected
might be preserved for ever has not been disappointed.
Great was the joy which this event produced. Calvin in-
formed Bullinger that " he had read his writings in company
with his brethren, as Viret also had done with his in Lausanne.
All were full of delight, and rivalled each other in offering thanks-
giving to God." There was therefore some indication of im-
provement.
The Bernese wished to delay the publication of the procecd-
VOL. II. G
82 CONSENSUS T1GURINUS. [CHAP. XV.
ings. Calvin however expressed to Viret the joy which he felt
at the influence which he knew the Consensus must exercise*.
" The hearts of good men will be cheered by that which has
taken place ; our constancy and resolution will derive new
strength from it, and we shall be better able to break the power
of the wicked. They who had formed an unworthy opinion of
us, will see that we proposed nothing but what is good and
right. Many who are still in a state of uncertainty will now
know on what they ought to depend ; and those in distant lands
who differ from us in opinion, will soon, we hope, offer us their
hand. Lastly, as it may one day happen, posterity will have a
witness to our faith, which it could not have derived from par-
ties in a state of strife; but this we must leave to God." To
Farcl, whose earnest Christian spirit could not but gain regard,
Calvin frequently wrote while these things were in progress.
He says indeed, " This unwearied champion of Christ was the
originator and leader of the whole. "
But Calvin himself had still many minds to tranquillize. Thus
he sought to satisfy the minister Sulzer in Bern, and left
nothing undone to induce one after the other of his opponents
to add their signatures to the new formulary f. "By the for-
mulary proposed in the Consensus Tigurimis" says Planck J,
" couched as it was in the strongest language, and intended to
reconcile all parties, the union of the Swiss with the Lutheran
system, in the first and main point of dispute, was accomplished,
or at least declared. It had hitherto been a matter of doubt
whether the Swiss, in partaking of the sacrament, recognized
the actual presence of the body of Christ, according to the sub-
stance. But doubt wras rendered impossible by the new formu-
lary, and every kind of suspicion on the subject was accordingly
removed. The formulary set forth the idea of a real presence,
and of an actual participation of the body of Christ in this sacra-
ment. But it explains, at the same time, the nature and manner
of this presence. According to Luther's doctrine, the body of
Christ was miraculously present in the sacrament, and brought
into such a union with the outward sign of the bread and wine,
that it is not only received at the same time with these, but in
* MS. Gen. Sept. 23, 1549.
t In a letter to Farel, Nov. 18, 1549 (MS. Gen.), he shows how power-
fully hia persaasiona had wrought with all, and characteristically adds, " Nos-
tra Binceritate adducti nihil ncgabunt."
X See this author's Remarks on the Separation and Reunion of the Pro-
testant Churches. Tubingen, 1803.
A.D. 1549.] UNION OF THE CHURCHES. 83
these, and under these, so that it is therefore partaken of by the
mouth by every one who receives the sign, even though he be
an unbeliever. According to Calvin's opinion, on the contrary,
the body of Christ is not brought down into the sacrament, but
the soul of him who partakes thereof is raised by faith towards
heaven, and is there brought into contact with the body of
Christ, and thus made a partaker of the divine life/' Simple,
but full of profound meaning, is Calvin's whole reasoning on this
subject.
The Consensus was forwarded through Bullinger to the vari-
ous confederate churches, and was everywhere received with the
greatest respect*. When the Bernese objected to the printing
of the document, some dissatisfied individuals being found among
them, Bullinger proposed to alter the preface and conclusion.
They now however agreed to its publication, giving only their
verbal assent to its contents. In October it appeared in its
printed form, with a letter, addressed by Calvin to the Zu-
richers, and the answer. The apostolic language of the latter
affords a striking contrast to the vulgar and abusive invectives
which were soon after spread abroad. This exalted and tran-
quil tone of feeling was the more remarkable, as displayed by a
people so often irritated, and only so lately reconciled to Calvin,
now the object of their grateful regard. It was especially a
grand moment for the inner life of the church, which, however
outwardly torn, had an inward unity in the Lord, when Me-
lancthon and most of the Lutheran party declared their agree-
ment with Calvin's views, and when the French reformed and
the Swiss united themselves anew, and expressed the genuine
sentiments of a true and primitive brotherhood. A glorious
communion was thus established, such as had never yet been
known. The epoch was no less noble in respect to the life of
Calvin. As the centre of the reformed churches, he had ren-
dered them the most important service, and had led them, by
the knowledge of Scripture and brotherly kindness, to truth and
concord.
There were also many admirable and learned men at a distance,
says Lavater, who shared the joy of these churches, and were
thereby strengthened in the faith, lie relates of Melancthon,
that he first learnt to understand rightly the doctrine of the
Lord's Supper from the Consensus, or that he began from this
time to incline towards the Zwinglians, not allowing himself to
* See Hess, Leben Bullingcrs, T. ii. p. 19-
G 2
81 THEODORE BEZA. [CHAP. XVI.
be induced, even by the most violent attempts to irritate him, to
speak or write against them. The Swiss sent a copy of the
formulary to England, for Bucer, who congratulated the whole
church on what had taken place. John a Lasco had also his
share in the general delight. Calvin and Farel communicated
the intelligence to the faithful in France, who gladly received
the good news. There were still some however who expressed
their dissatisfaction at the formulary. Melancthon himself seems
to have admitted the article on election with some unwillingness.
It was objected to the Zurichers that they had falsified Calvin's
writing, and to Calvin that he had been guilty of vacillation, and
had received the doctrine of Zwingli. But the main attack
against the Consensus did not take place till some years later,
and therefore belongs to another period of our history.
CHAPTER XVI.
UNION OF GREAT MINDS. A PLAN TO EFFECT UNITY OF
DOCTRINE AND DISCIPLINE BY A COMMUNITY OF SPIRIT.
HARMONY BETWEEN LUTHER AND CALVIN IN LIVING
FAITH. MELANCTHON.
While Calvin was occupied with his plan, and with his journey
to Zurich, where he hoped also to effect something for his op-
pressed fellow-countrymen, eight noblemen arrived at Geneva
from France, whence they had been driven by the persecution.
One of these strangers was distinguished by his noble form and
bearing, by his genius, energy and earnestness. But the love of
the world was still unconquered in him. When these gentle-
men were presented to Calvin, he immediately recognized in the
one referred to an old friend of his youthful years. It was
Theodore von Beza, of Vezelay in Burgundy. They all asked
permission of the council to remain in Geneva, and Calvin em-
ployed all his zeal and ardour to induce Beza to unite with him
in accomplishing the work of the Lord in Switzerland. He had
learnt to admire his talents when he met him, a young man, at
the house of Melchior Wolmar; and he saw in him one whom
God had sent to share his conflicts, to become, as it were, his
A.D. 1549.] THEODORE BEZA. 85
right arm, to carry forward the reformation at a later period,
and to supply his place in the consistory at Geneva.
Thus a friend was sent to Calvin, just as the loss of his wife
had rendered one so especially needed. But Beza, rich, full of
talent, and worldly, had first to be freed from the vortex of out-
ward life. His old instructor, Wolmar, had done his part.
Beza adopted the reformed faith, married the lady with whom
he had lived in France, and associated himself with Crespin in
Geneva, in order to establish a learned book-trade, a project
which was subsequently productive of great good. Calvin soon
after induced him to commence his theological career in Lau-
sanne, to which city he had been invited by the council of Bern,
as professor of Greek. He soon after his arrival published a
poem on the sacrifice of Abraham, which obtained considerable
praise. Not long after, the French refugees earnestly requested
him to expound the Epistle to the Romans, and he thus laid
the foundation for his learned labours on the New Testament.
With what zeal Calvin had assailed him appears from his
own words*. It is delightful to see how he speaks, in his bio-
graphy of Calvin, of that period, when he first devoted himself
to the service of the Lord.
Beza, who united to earnestness and powerful eloquence a
fascinating manner, was admirably adapted to uphold, both by
his piety and skill, the now flourishing church. From this time
Calvin undertook nothing without him, and in the year 1552
Beza had already begun to appear as the champion of the re-
former's great design. To all the other arguments advanced by
Calvin, he added, that a church divided into sects and opposed
to that of Rome, especially in France, could never stand. It is
not to be supposed however that he wished to see a single man,
acknowledged as the head of the church, and endowed with au-
thority above all the rest. He had even much less affection for
the episcopal element than Calvin, and it is grossly unjust to
ascribe his zeal for the church to political ambition, as if he had
not, as well as Calvin, been urged forward by the Spirit of God.
It surely was not from any earthly motive that he defended the
doctrine of predestination, nor was it as a contriver of plots that
he could have been employed by Calvin in Switzerland. Both
the one and the other soared too high to be inspired by motives
of this kind; and when they contemplated the miseries of the
world, they felt the movements of a mightier will conducting
* To Viret, Oct. 1549 (MS. Gen.), and MS. Goth.
86 PETER MARTYR. [CHAP. XVI.
them along the path which they had chosen. Beza's enthu-
siastic admiration for Calvin was founded on their communion
in Christ, whom both had learnt to own as their inner life.
There has rarely occurred indeed in the history of mankind so
remarkable a period as this. A number of exalted minds, roused
by the great events of the age, felt themselves impelled to ex-
tend the hand of friendship to each other, and to establish a
living union in the Lord. Calvin formed the shining centre of
this circle, while other stars, some small and some great, moved
around him and gathered light from his rays. The disputatious
spirit of a mean and envious faction, which so soon overpowered
the voice of faith, and exercised its injurious influence on the
age, had not yet been awakened.
If we take a single glance of the others who were united with
Calvin in spirit, none will appear more fitted to occupy the
place next to Beza than Peter Martyr Vermili, whom Calvin
was accustomed to call miraculum Italia. He was the most
learned of the reformers, but was far more beloved and admired
for his simplicity, his childlike, pious disposition, his modera-
tion, so free from all ambition, and his pure love of the truth,
which rendered him an enemy to every kind of useless contro-
versy. He entertained the highest regard for Calvin. There
is a letter of his in which he asked him respecting the mystery
of our communion with Christ : the reformer answered him
literally according to his fundamental principles. He enter-
tained the most entire love for peace and union. " Can there
be anything fairer/5 he said in a letter to Beza, " than brotherly
agreement in the church?" He especially loved all those who
hated strife, and thus he cherished the warmest affection for
Melancthon. His opinion was in perfect accord with that of
Calvin on the subject of the Lord's Supper, and particularly as
it was opposed to the doctrine of ubiquity. Christ, he argued,
has the two natures united in one person, without any mixture
or confusion of their qualities. According to his divine nature,
therefore, He is everywhere present; but according to his body,
lie must have one place, and can therefore neither realiter nor
substantiality be present in the sacrament. In the affair of
Servetus also he thoroughly agreed with Calvin. He defended
the doctrine of election with all its awful deductions, induced to
adopt these views by the same profound reverence for God as
Calvin. W hen the dispute on the sacrament commenced at
Strasburg, he declared himself ready to sign the Augsburg Con-
A.D. 1549.] BUCER IN ENGLAND. 87
fession, if it was rightly understood. In this respect also he
resembled Calvin, who, although he seemed to have excited an
opposition, yet, through his deeper consciousness, the influence
of a living faith and his love for union, rose superior to all party
considerations.
This mention of Peter Martyr brings to our mind the cele-
brated Italians of that period, who had found at Ferrara an
asylum with the duchess Renata, that noble-hearted protectress
of all who were friends of Calvin. The usual tranquil feeling
now prevailed in Germany, but the country was still bowed be-
neath the storms of the Interim, and had little prospect of per-
manent religious peace. Melancthon, who was ever anxious to
promote unity, and habitually overlooked the smaller differences
of doctrine, was labouring earnestly to accomplish this object.
In this he was supported by Cruciger, and by all who were sin-
cerely devoted to the living doctrines which had been taught by
Luther. In Zurich the bold and faithful Bullinger, who kept
the churches of Zurich together by his watchfulness, and showed
how strongly he was moved by the pure and noble spirit of
Zwingli; Pellicanus, and the fervent, deep-feeling Musculus,
who, persecuted on account of God's Word, sought consolation
in God alone, and found it; and lastly Gualter, the nephew of
Zwingli and disciple of Bullinger,— all these lived and laboured
with Calvin, in one spirit and with one aim.
If we turn our attention to England, we shall there see Bucer,
sometimes indeed vacillating, but always anxious to promote
what was good and profitable for the unity of the church; giving
a higher place to the faith than to the formularies which express
it, and exercising an important influence on the side of the party
desiring peace. Nor must Fagius be forgotten; nor the en-
lightened John a Lasco, who had formed a church of true be-
lievers in that country; nor Uttenhoven, who, with the former,
was soon to be obliged to flee, on account of his belief; nor
the courageous Knox, whose faith also was now to be again
proved, that he might become a mightier instrument in the
hand of the Lord.
In France, queen Margaret, and her heroic daughter Johanna
d'Albret, co-operated nobly with Calvin and Beza: the latter of
these ladies had greatly advanced in the knowledge of the truth.
On the same side also were Coligni and many other admirable
men, all prepared to defend the Gospel. Who could fail to re-
joice at this spectacle, or to express delight that this commu-
83 calvin's moderation. [chap. xvi.
nion in the Lord had been accomplished by the renewed church!
Christ ruled spiritually in the regenerated congregation.
Farel had been long anxious to see this living union and peace
secured to the church. In 1515 he wrote to Calvin, expressing
his wish that all churches would combine together to anni-
hilate strife. The Augsburg Confession might, he considered, be
accepted, and he greatly desired that people would make it the
ground of union, with this condition, that the Lord's Supper
should be viewed according to the doctrine of Melancthon*.
Theological differences and distinctions did not appear to Cal-
vin a sufficient cause for separation : his liberality indeed went
so far that, where he did not observe a perverse will, he was
ready to admit even freethinkers into his society. We may
here mention his treatment of some Italian refugees who joined
him at this period, and whom he exhorted with paternal earnest-
ness to submit themselves to the teaching of the Bible. He
entertained the highest regard for Bernardin Ochin of Sienna,
whom he described as prceclarus vir and vir magnus omnibus
modish. Still more interesting was his connection with Laelius
Socinus J. He discovered in this excellent man some difference
of doctrine, and he warned him accordingly ; but he never per-
secuted him, for he saw that he was struggling to find the truth,
and was not, like Servetus, engaged in diffusing blasphemous
errors for the sake of destroying the church. Calvin's conduct
towards him is worthy of especial notice : it throws new light
upon his character, and proves that he was not, as has been so
commonly believed, a persecutor; but that he was, on the con-
trary, ready to suffer variety of opinion, if it did not manifestly
tend to the ruin of unity. He even recommended Socinus in
the strongest manner to prince Radzivil, when the latter was
* His expressions on this subject were very strong : — " Augustanam Con-
fessionem tolerabilem existimo, nee tain abhorrendam reputo ab ea— Quid
volumus pro Augustana Confessione novam suscitarc tragcediam ? Una est
con trover si a de cocna; si Augustana Confessio de coena contineat quod sana
expositione admitti rossit, et secundum mentem autoris, quid prohibct, quin
admittamus et sancte convenianius?" — April, 1558.
f Commending him to Oswald, a minister at Basel, he spoke of him as a
man who had gained a great name in Italy, and deserved to be held in honour
everywhere.
J La lius Socinus was ofVicenza: he appears to have derived his dogmas
from the Grecian philosophy. Having fled into Poland, he there taught anti-
trinitarianisra, explaining allegorically the passages in Scripture which op-
posed his views. Mis nephew Faustus inherited his spirit and completed
his work. Calvin answered him, Epis. 359. Ed. Amst. p. 197. Ep. 104. Ed.
Amst. p. 57. 7 Idus Dec. 1549.
A.D. 1549.] LUTHER AND CALVIN. 89
proceeding to Poland, though he was well acquainted with
Socinus's peculiar views. Beza in his life of Calvin says, in
reference to these times, that Calvin laboured in two very re-
markable writings to effect the conversion of this Italian. Socinus
however was still hesitating, and put various questions to the
reformer, who adhered like a child to Scripture, as the only
foundation of a living unity.
Calvin had at length accomplished, by means of the Zurich
Consensus, that which he had so constantly and resolutely pur-
sued. How gladly would he now have ceased from his restless
strife ! In the Confession of 1554 he gave full expression to his
belief: it was then the same as that of the church in Germany,
and could never create any schism among those who were joined
together in true communion with the Lord. All who had the
genuine spirit and life of religion in their hearts still felt them-
selves thus united, even when the church exhibited its growth
and development, as it sometimes needs must, by means of op-
posing principles. Calvin, as I have already remarked, Mas
necessarily in contrast with Luther. The peculiarities of his
theology, like those of the German reformer, were for a parti-
cular purpose ; while the separation of the churches arose only
from sin and ignorance. They agreed in faith : their opposition
lay in the constitution of their minds ; this gave a different
direction to their course; but instead of contracting their energy,
it tended to increase their vigour and activity. Each laboured
according to his peculiar character. Calvin sought to establish
order, to diffuse knowledge, and reconcile hostile parties. With
him the understanding was chief; with Luther, energy and ex-
citement of spirit. But while the latter possessed also the high-
est intellectual powers, so neither did Calvin fail to exhibit,
quickened as he was by the spiritual view which he took of the
Lord's Supper, and strengthened by the sublime doctrine of
election, energy to fulfil the work which he had commenced.
The medium by which the two reformers were brought together
was Christian sentiment: this it was which secured the growth
of what was evangelical in cither party ; which lived in the pro-
found mind of Melancthon, and is still even in our own clay
exercising its general influence. It would not be altogether just
to contrast Zwingli with Luther, or to suppose that Calvin occu-
pied the place between them : it was only in respect to the
sacrament that this was the case. In regard to the doctrine
of predestination, Zwingli appears equally rough and severe.
90 DOCTRINE OF THE SACRAMENT. [dlAP. XVI.
Nor does he, even as regards the Lord's Supper, stand imme-
diately opposed to Luther. Firmly resisting the catholic doc-
trine, but with a too narrow-sighted view, he yet did not set
aside a pure and rational exposition of the subject : the worst
which he did was to deprive his own system of depth and sub-
limity. Reflection ever prevailed with Calvin ; and it was there-
fore in harmony with the general operations of his mind, that,
when the question was put, how Christ was present in the sacra-
ment, he should plainly declare, that, as having a body which
was limited, He could be present in one place only, and not in
all places and in all times ; and consequently, that the believing
soul must raise itself in the sacrament to hold communion with
Him. But neither the worthy nor the unworthy, he added,
could in, with, or under the bread, receive Him bodily, seeing
that, where space has ceased to exist, no body can be properly
spoken of. At the same time it was equally clear that Luther,
who did not investigate the mystery with such careful thought,
contemplated the glorified body of our Lord as diffused through
all times and in all places, considering no boundary to exist be-
tween this world and heaven. Both, in one sense, were right,
and both were wrong : for while it is not given to man to com-
prehend the glorified body of Christ, so each ought to have been
contented with simply acknowledging his presence in the sacra-
ment, without attempting to explain the hoiv. Luther especially
erred in this matter ; he insisted on the doctrine of a personal
communication, and hence rendered the mystery of the Lord's
Supper a subject of long and painful controversy. Calvin, on
the other hand, employed his powerful intellect in fathoming,
as far as possible, the mighty judgements of God, without feeling
the giddiness which seized Luther and Melancthon, when, in the
earlier part of their career, they accompanied him on this peril-
ous course. They clearly saw, at a subsequent period, the dan-
gerous nature of the subject ; and hence their silence respecting
it, and the milder character of the expressions employed by Me-
lancthon, and after him in the Formula Concord'ue. Various
opinions were not to be avoided, for it is from various points of
view that the truth is to be discovered ; but it is neither neces-
sary nor becoming that this should be made a cause of sepa-
ration. The two reformers are in this respect worthy of the
highest admiration. Though dogmatic differences became too
visible in Luther's lifetime, they felt that there was a bond be-
tween them, created by the higher species of unity which they
A.D. 1549.] DOCTRINE OF THE SACRAMENT. 91
were mutually seeking. Calvin's theology was, as little as Lu-
ther's, the mere product of the understanding : he formally pro-
tested against such a notion*: it sprung from a living faith in
the holy Scriptures. Thus Luther also felt himself as a believer
united with Melancthon, notwithstanding the difference of their
temper. How otherwise could he have administered the com-
munion to him ? But as soon as the pride of reason obscured
and chilled belief, and more weight was given to the power of
comprehension than to the life of God in the soul, separation
was at hand, for the most violent passions gathered about the
understanding ; the feeling of Christ's presence grew daily less,
and the feast of love at length became a source of the bitterest
hate. It is necessary therefore, in the history of the church, to
place in the clearest light the schismatic conduct of the people,
who gave such an undue importance to differences of opinion,
annihilating faith in the true communion of Christ, and con-
verting the blessed unity and love of the Gospel into an apple
of discord. But even far more culpable are those who, in the
present day, when the opposition between the two churches has
ceased, strive to give prominence to opposing sentiments, and
thus through their wilfulness stifle the principle of communion,
instead of acknowledging with Calvin that the mystery of the
Lord's Supper far surpasses our comprehension.
The larger portion of the evils of the following century may
be traced to the excessive respect which it thus became the habit
to render to the decisions of the understanding. Instead of
refraining from any interference with the unavoidable difference
of opinion existing on the subject of the sacrament, and seeking
communion in Christ, each party only hardened itself the more
in its one-sidedness, and became fiercer and fiercer against the
rest. When we contemplate, in Germany especially, the Fla-
cianer, the followers of Heshusius, Brentius, Westphoal, Mar-
bach and others, treading underfoot the true and living faith, and
giving the tone to after times, it is impossible not to feel, that no
real reformation had as yet been effected, and that the scourge
of the thirty years' war was yet needed to excite, through mani-
fold afflictions, a higher and better spirit. After that event
indeed, the unchristian hatred which had so long prevailed bc-
* See instances of this, Institutes, lib. i. c. IS, sec. 4. " Let it be under-
stood," he says, " that it is our duty to embrace with gentleness and docility,
and without exception, whatever is delivered to us in holy Scripture." So
also Institut. lib. iv. c. 17, sec. 24, 25.
92 UNION OF BELIEVERS. [CHAP. XVI.
came less conspicuous, and the bond of union in the church
began to be more distinctly felt. But since the well-being of
the next generation depends upon whether we hold fast com-
munion in Christ, or allow the church to be rent and shattered
by division, and thus bring forth a blessing or a curse, so it is
our bounden duty, in the present day, to take care, that true be-
lievers secure a higher stand than those who are quarrelling
about nice distinctions ; that every one may be able to choose
whether he will take his part with the destroyers, or with the
benefactors of the church.
Lutherans and reformed stand side by side in the united
church. Opposition has entered with union, but the life of
Christ is superior to opposition. Calvin, Luther and Melanc-
thon exhibited this principle in their own time, and the union
therefore of later days has only expressed their sentiment. It
shows little candour, consequently, when the most diligent exa-
mination is made of the differences existing in the creed of the
reformers, and an utter indifference prevails as to their general
agreement. The most marvelous zeal appears in the revival
of old disputes, but no effort is employed to give a fresh warmth
to languishing faith from the noble example of the reformers.
Let it be supposed that any one should assert, that Calvin had
not the right faith, that he did not abide by God's Word, or that
the truth, and that through his own fault, was not clearly known
to him, it must then follow as a necessary consequence that Luther
also was thus deficient, for he recognized Calvin as his fellow-
believer. Attempts have been made to fix upon the reformed
the old charge of Nestorianism. This has probably been done
to give them the right to make a counter-attack upon the Lu-
therans, and to brand them as Eutychians and Monophysites,
as if both parties had torn with their hands the glorified body
of the Lord. To-day, when the reformation has reached its ob-
ject, and the church has been formed, we have to obey a new
impulse, and to employ the power of the faith which we have
realized in the grand work of converting the people who still lie
in the darkness of heathenism. In this respect we are to view
the whole reformation as a far-stretching field, from which we
are still to press bravely onward. It certainly is not the time
to retrace the progress made during three hundred years, for the
sake of renewing the controversies of ancient times. Lament-
able indeed must be the state of things, if such a profound be-
lief in the mystery of the sacrament as that of Calvin should
A.D. 1549.] UNION OF BELIEVERS. 93
become the subject of suspicion in a church, where, the former
difficulty having been solved, it is now an obvious duty to go
forward, and so to consider the still-existing controversy with
the catholic church, that sooner or later this also may be settled.
It is of importance therefore to state, in this part of our work,
all those circumstances which tend to exhibit the harmony of
opinion, in matters of actual faith, which existed among the
founders of the reformed church. We cannot fail to derive a
feeling of security from the unity of living faith discernible in
all those of whom we have spoken above, and more particularly
in Luther and Calvin.
That the latter did not exhibit in the Consensus Tigurinus a
mere dry product of the understanding, a so-called parchment-
pope, must be evident to all who have the witness of the Holy
Spirit, the author of unity, in their hearts. The sacrament was
the central point of his spiritual life : he lived only for that.
Hence his earnestness in defending it against the approach of
the unworthy, or whatever might defile its sanctity ; and the
profound anxiety which he felt as the seasons came round for
its administration. To him it was the medium of a most inti-
mate communion with Jesus : it was associated in his mind with
the sublimest ideas, — with faith in the divine sacrifice, and in
the present and personal being of Him who alone can give us
life. According to Calvin, the faithful enjoy the glorified Christ,
— the unworthy and the wicked receive Him not. This depends
not on the words of consecration : such a notion is contrary to
the spirit of Christ : he imparts not himself to the unholy.
Thus also Calvin connected with this doctrine the communion
of believers, it being in communion only that the sacrament can
be properly enjoyed. Even in his catechism for children he
speaks of a real and actual union *. The mystical element
therefore existed in Calvin in its highest form and energy : he
was convinced that the flesh and blood of Christ are partaken
of in the sacrament, and his doctrine was in perfect agreement
with that of Luther, except that his expressions were more spi-
ritual, and he rejected from his view of the mystery what is
sensual and local. His sound understanding could never com-
prehend how that which is divine can be eaten and swallowed in
earthly elements ; nor how that which is local can be regarded as
available for the spirit. The godly and glorified Christ is that
* Bossuct found the expressions lure referred to so Lutheran that he re-
marked it in his Hist, des Variat. t. ii. p. 10.
94 DOCTRINE OF THE SACRAMENT. [CHAP. XVI.
alone which penetrates the believer's soul and becomes one with
him.
The doctrine of predestination was a fruitful cause of oppo-
sition, but it did not separate Calvin from all those who formed
a somewhat different opinion on the subject. He practically
agreed with Luther in this matter; and in his last Confession,
drawn up in 15G2, he speaks more decidedly than ever against
those who trusted to predestination, rather than to that which
immediately concerned their state*. It is worthy of observation,
that his nearest friends, as Farel for example, regarded his
teaching in respect to this doctrine, and as he imparted it to
them, not as repulsive, but full of consolation f. Calvin and
Mclancthon did not, it must be owned, agree in this doctrine at
a subsequent period. The latter, according to Calvin, viewed it
too philosophically ; but this did not hinder Calvin from editing
Melancthon's principal work, or from showing the world that
he did not view this difference of opinion as of any great im-
portance. In our times it would probably be regarded as a
sufficient excuse for separation.
It is well known that both by his system of faith, as seen in
the period extending from 1541 to 1554, and by the party con-
solidated through the second Consensus, he stood in open oppo-
sition to Lutheranism: but nothing was said about division.
The churches could not but persevere in those principles, which
were subsequently more strongly set forth in the Formula Con-
cordia?, and in the Confession of the Synod of Dort. But nei-
ther Calvin nor Luther, had he lived in those days, would have
allowed a separation to arise from such a cause. A deeper feel-
ing would have told them both, that the exaltation of the soul
to Christ, or the descent of Christ into the bread in the sacra-
ment, can be as little understood as the consistency of election
with the free and the moral nature of man : but both are stated
in Scripture, and both are realities for the Christian. Many
proofs also exist that Melancthon never swerved from the Wit-
tenberg Concordate, but lived, by the influence of a genuine
faith, in constant friendship with both parties in the church.
When he found himself seized with a dangerous sickness, in
* "We are not of the number of those fanatics who, under the shade of
God's eternal predestination, think not of attaining to the life which is pro-
mised us by the right way. But regarding ourselves as children of God, we
know that it is necessary to believe in Jesus Christ, and that in Him alone
we can properly seek salvation." f Schmidt : Etudes sur Farel, p. 45.
A.D. 1549.] LUTHER AND CALVIN. 95
1541, he declared his assent to the established faith. His let-
ters to Dietrich, a minister at Nuremberg, show that he recog-
nized a sacramental presence of Christ, though no inclosing of the
body in the bread; that is, that Christ is actually present when
we rightly receive the symbols or signs of grace. He thus ex-
pressed himself at Ratisbonne in 1541. In 1542 and 1543 he
remarked in his letters to Dietrich, that they ought to be severely
censured who pretend that the body of the Lord is inclosed in
the bread, as by a sort of magic, at the pronouncing of certain
words. He is far however from representing the sacrament as
a simple supper : on the contrary, he expresses his conviction,
that by the use of the outward signs of grace, Christ makes us
members of his body, and works mightily in us. It is thus that
he represents the doctrine in his Locis as published in 1543.
He had even resolved to leave Wittenberg, when Luther re-
newed the controversy, rather than swerve from the Concordat.
That Melancthon agreed in this respect with Calvin, appears
from a letter written by the latter to Farel in 1539. Calvin
also appealed to his example in his second Apology against
Westphal in 1556. " Philip will state in a single word if I be
not of his opinion, for I will spend no more words on the sub-
ject:" and in 1557 be says, "If I be found guilty of rashly
using the name of Melancthon, I will submit to any degree of
infamy. I have said it a hundred times, that Philip can no
more be torn from me in this cause than from his own bowels."
And this agreement continued from 1539 onwards, through a
period, that is, of seventeen years. Both also were associated
with Caspar Cruciger, whom Luther always loved and distin-
guished. Melancthon was far from denying this his agreement
with Calvin*.
But still more surprising, and in our times more important
to the evangelical church, is the perfect harmony between Cal-
vin and Luther in belief. This can be shown by various facts,
sufficiently striking to convince any unprejudiced mind. These
two great men were never in actual strife ; and had Luther lived
longer, they would probably have learnt to entertain for each
other the strictest regard. With respect to the Lord's Supper,
it is well known that Calvin's treatise against Pighius De Libera
Arbxtrio appeared in 1543, that is, before the death of Luther,
* See also Melancthon's letters to Calvin in the years 1552, 1554, 1555.
Ed. Anist. p. 60. Ed. Laus. Ep. 137, fcc
9(5 LUTHER AND CALVIN. [CHAP. XVI.
and was dedicated to Melancthon. In this work he defended
Luther with the greatest zeal, and this was not likely to remain
unknown to the German reformer. The argument prefixed to
the paper indicates the agreement between them. " That which
is the main point in this question, and on account of which all
the rest is said, we now defend, as it was originally proposed by
Luther and others/5 Calvin quotes his Institutions several
times on this occasion. To this may be added the important
fact, that Luther never uttered the least word of disrespect
against Calvin, although the latter, eleven years before Luther's
death, exhibited in his celebrated catechism, without any alter-
ation, his whole system of doctrine, and especially that on the
sacrament. Luther had read his earlier writings, and particularly
his Institutes, in the first and second editions, " cum singulari
voluptate" as he said. He sent him his greeting in his well-
known letter to Bucer, in 1539. " Saluta mild rever enter J.
Sturmitim et J. Calvinum, whose books I have read with especial
pleasure.'5 But in the works referred to the whole doctrine of
the Lord's Supper was as clearly set forth as at any future
period. It is also probable that Luther had in his mind Cal-
vin's little treatises, De Fugiendis impiorum illicitis saci'is, and
De Papisticis Sacei'dotiis, in which he expressly declares his
opinion respecting the sacrifice of the altar. It was against the
Zwinglians only that Luther raged so fiercely, and his indigna-
tion was excited in their case because he regarded them as anni-
hilating the very essence of the sacrament. His last attack
upon the Zurichers is of no dogmatic importance to the church.
It was occasioned by the publication of Zwingli's last and some-
what too freely expressed treatise, and by that of the new trans-
lation of the Bible into German. Nor must it be forgotten, that
Calvin was sent during Luther's lifetime to the Colloquy at
Frankfort, and to the Diets of Worms and Ratisbonne, in the
character of a deputy, to support the Augsburg Confession, and
that he was received there, and treated with marked confidence,
by the most celebrated of the Lutheran theologians. If these
distinguished men had found him opposed to the doctrine of
Luther, Luther himself would not have been long in evincing
his resentment. Sleidan numbers him among the friends of the
Confession, and to these Luther wrote without exception in the
following words:— " Nolite timerc, estote fortes et laeti, nihil
solliciti." But he knew that Calvin was there with the rest.
A.D. 1549.] LUTHER AND CALVIN. 1)7
Had he regarded him as a man who held dangerous or erroneous
opinions, he would quickly have warned the princes and others
who were present against his discourse.
But still further: it is related, that when Luther, in 1540,
according to the command of the Elector, visited Melancthon in
Weimar, Dr. Cruciger read to him, as they travelled, Calvin's
answer to Sadolet's address to the Genevese. Luther on this
occasion bore the following remarkable testimony to Calvin's
worth : — " This writing has hands and feet, and I rejoice that
God has called up such people, who, if it be his will, may give
the final blow to the papacy, and finish by his help what I have
commenced against antichrist*."
There is something especially refreshing in the relation, which,
bearing all the internal signs of truth, is wanting in none of the
outer, and from which it appears evident that Luther agreed
with Calvin on the subject of the Lord's Supper, and felt alto-
gether united with him in faith. This narrative carries us to
old Wittenberg, and shows us Luther as he used to come from
his lecture, surrounded by students, and stood at the door of a
famous bookseller's shop. Here are the old and remarkable
words, so little known, but which must be very precious to all
evangelical christians : — " Calvin's book, thus far translated into
Latin by Galasius, appeared again in 1545, and was brought to
Wittenberg t. On the Monday after Quasimodogeniti, when
Dr. Luther had finished his lecture on Genesis, upon which he
was still engaged, he proceeded to the shop of the bookseller
Maurice Goltschen, who had just returned from the great Easter
fair. Luther welcomed him home, and continued in these words :
( Well, Maurice, what good news is there at Frankfort ? Do
they wish to burn the arch-heretic Luther?' Thereupon Mau-
rice replied, ' I have heard nothing thereof, honoured sir ; but
I have brought with me a little book, which John Calvin wrote
some time ago in French, on the Lord's Supper, and which has
been lately republished in Latin. It is said of Calvin, that he
is a young but a pious and learned man. In this little book he
seems to have shown in what respect your reverence, and both
* A clear and candid account of the Sacramentarian Controversy was writ-
ten by Christopher Petzel, doctor and professor at Bremen, where he died in
1604. His greatest works were, Examen Theologian Melancthonis cum Ex-
plicationibus, 1589 ; Argumenta et Objectiones de Articulis Christians Doc-
trinae cum Responsionibus, 1788 ; and De Predestinatione, 1604.
t Calvin's work first appeared in 1540, and in January 1545 it was printed
in Latin by Nicolaus Galasius.
VOL. II. H
98 LUTHER AND CALVIN. [CHAP, XVI.
Zwinglius and CEcolampadius, have gone too far in your con-
troversy on this subject.' As Maurice Goltschen did not ex-
press himself very well, Luther answered quickly, ' Give me
the book, friend!' The bookseller immediately gave him an
octavo copy, stitched up. Having taken it in his hands, Dr.
Luther sat down and read the first three leaves after the title,
and then the last four and a half to the end. These he read
with particular attention, and at last said, ' Maurice, this is cer-
tainly a learned and pious man, and I might well have entrusted
the whole affair of this controversy to him from the beginning.
I confess my part. If my opponents had done the like, we
should soon have been reconciled, since it only needed that
GEcolampadius and Zwinglius should have thus explained them-
selves, to prevent the controversy from proceeding to such
lengths.' This Was heard by Matthias Stoius, who was one of
the numerous students by whom Dr. Luther was then sur-
rounded. He was at that time a boarder in his house, but sub-
sequently became a doctor of medicine, and was appointed pri-
vate physician to the old duke of Prussia. The story was re-
peated in the presence of many of the nobility of the archduke
Albrecht."
The testimony of Dr. Alesius Scotus, a professor at Leipzig,
and the friend of Luther and Melancthon, is well known, and
has been often printed. In his answer to Ruard Tapper's de-
fence of the Louvain articles, he says, " They do as if they were
ignorant of what Luther said to Philip, ere he set out for his
native province, where he died. Philip related it to many, and
in various ways, that Luther, unasked, said, ( I own that too
much has been done respecting the sacrament :' and when Philip
answered, ( Let us then, my good doctor, for the sake of the
churches, publish some pacific treatise, in which we may clearly
unfold our views ' — Luther replied, < My Philip, I have thought
anxiously on this matter ; but as I might throw suspicion upon
the whole doctrine, I will only commend it to the good care of
God. Do you do something after my death.' These words
were written down from Melancthon's own mouth." It was the
wish of the latter to mention the subject in his testament, but
he died too soon. The witness of Dr. Alesius, who had the
account from Melancthon himself, is therefore valuable. It
seems certain, that as Zwingli had a deeper insight into the
sacrament in the latter years of his life, Luther also, a year be-
fore his death, was of one faith and of one mind with Calvin.
A.D. 1549.] LUTHER AND CALVIN. 99
He regarded him as a brother, and viewed his doctrine as fitted
to restore union to the distracted church. And as Luther in-
clined to Calvin, so did Calvin to Luther. He twice declared
his assent to the Augsburg Confession, and stated that, in his
opinion, the formulary of the Zurich Union contained whatever
was found in the Confession.
We may here, in conclusion, quote some of the most remark-
able expressions which he employed to show his agreement with
that formulary. Thus, in a letter to Martin Schaling, a minister
at Ratisbonne, he says, " I am so far from repudiating the
Augsburg Confession, that I have willingly and gladly subscribed
it, interpreting it as I am authorized to do*." To Marbach, a
minister at Strasburgf? he wrote, ee If that excellent servant of
the Lord, and faithful doctor of the church, Martin Luther, were
still alive, he would not be so severe and implacable as to refuse
his ready assent to this Confession, namely, that that is truly
afforded us which the sacraments figure, and that we are there-
fore partakers of the body and blood of Christ. How often
did Luther say, that he contended for nothing but that it might
be clearly understood, that the Lord does not mock us with
empty signs, but that He fulfils inwardly that which is repre-
sented to the eye, and that thus the substance is connected with
the sign ! Hence, if I do not greatly err, wre are agreed, that
the Supper of the Lord is no vain, dramatic representation of a
spiritual feast, but that it truly imparts to us what it presents,
and that holy hearts are nourished therein by the body and
blood of Christ. Greatly would it trouble me if a doctrine
should now be rejected, which I so many years ago taught
freely and openly at Strasburg, both in the schools and in the
churches."
Thus Calvin, in the second epoch of his career, had firmly
established his evangelical system by institutions of correspond-
ing character. It only remained for him to extend his system,
and to combat opposing errors. The Consensus Tigurinus^ which
became blended with the Helvetic Confession, should, accord-
ing to Calvin's plan, have passed into the Augsburg Confession.
There would then have been no mention of Lutherans and Cal-
vinists, and the whole evangelical church would have presented
one glorious and imposing mass.
* Ed. Laus. Ep. 236. Ed. Amst. p. 112 (1557).
f Ed. Laus. Ep. 177. Ed. Amst. p. 84 (1554).
ii 2
PART III.
103
CHAPTER I.
INTRODUCTORY REMARKS. CHARACTERISTICS OF CALVIN.
A survey of the last period of Calvin's labours will help us to
resolve the question, why has not a milder judgement been
passed upon him ? Why have his merits not been more gene-
rally recognized ? or how is it that, in some church histories, he
has been even passed over with contempt? We here see him
involved in difficulties of such a peculiar kind, that it is easy to
understand how he might be wrongly judged. Appearances
were in some respects against him : his judge must be a Christian,
an evangelical Christian : he ought to be also an intelligent, un-
prejudiced theologian, and one well- acquainted with the state of
affairs; otherwise his decision will be faulty. Calvin's life is
not popular. The hatred against him is a natural consequence
of his resolute effort to establish his doctrine, and with his doc-
trine the unity of the church. That which concerns the pecu-
liarity of his mind I have shown in the first part of this work,
and in the introduction to the second. It will be sufficient
therefore here to remark, that if an outward splendour be want-
ing to the circumstances of his life, his spiritual comprehension
was of a sublimer kind than that of other reformers. What
place then will he occupy, when his course has been fairly sur-
veyed, in the estimation of mankind? Will he appear in their
eyes as one of those unbending, resolute and ambitious men,
who have shaken the world with their plans? or will he be
ranked with those heroic natures who sought nothing for them-
selves, and whose labours, resigning as they did all for the good
of mankind, bear on them the stamp of godliness, and the fame
of which, like a mighty wind, passes on from age to age, and
acquires at length the character of greatness? or will he be
placed on a still higher eminence ? Christians are not called
great in the common sense of the expression. Shall he be styled
then an apostolic champion of the truth ?
A degree of mystery has long hovered over the grave of this
celebrated man. It may properly be said of him, " Calvin's
greatness was his fate:" or it may be asserted that the world
mistook him because of the vastness of the task given him to
104 CHARACTERISTICS OF CALVIN. [CHAP. I.
perform, while before the eternal judgement-seat he will be ac-
counted as a faithful soldier of the Lord. That which displeases
in him arose from the nature of his duty. There was a certain
fiery excess, a daringness in his nature, which many could not
forgive. It mingled itself with his southern blood; and the
zeal of a prophet of the old covenant is hardly to be understood
in conjunction with Christianity.
But the intelligent observer will not fail to perceive, that the
duty imposed upon Calvin to confirm the reformation, was at-
tended with peculiar difficulties. His whole strength was ex-
erted to overcome them, and it was only on some rare occasions
that he allowed a doubt as to the final result to enter his mind.
At first, indeed, he trembled at the obligation which he was
called upon to encounter. The wonderful ways by which God
led him were only opened by degrees ; but on his death-bed he
could say, " that light shone upon him in all his struggles, and
that the blessing of God was with him." He sometimes indeed
rose to a height whence it was difficult for him to take a distinct
view of his actual circumstances. Unconscious of it himself, he
was urged onward by an inward fire, by a burning conviction,
that he was destined before all others to proclaim certain doc-
trines, to awaken a new feeling of devotion to God, and to lead
men to ascribe to Him alone the work of redemption, inde-
pendent of all human merit. It would have seemed to him as
if all had been lost, had he not hoped to see this doctrine planted
in the religious conscience of mankind. Hence he was little
understood in his age, and sometimes not even by his friends.
But here was the mystery of his vocation, and the world could
not tell why he proceeded to such lengths in his desire to ful-
fil it.
Calvin's designs, as seen at this period of his life, were retro-
spective ; they were formed for the purpose of restraint, for the
security of that which had been won. Manifold were the dis-
gusts which hence arose. It is difficult to find the right mea-
sure in such cases ; and the multitude which readily renders its
aid to change and overthrow, is little disposed to assist in build-
ing up and securing. To act retrospectively, is never so ani-
mating as to advance boldly forward against the vice and oppres-
sion which may have been long endured. Thus Luther enjoyed
sympathy and gratitude, while Calvin had to encounter blame
and criticism : the latter felt himself under the control of a spirit
which desired unity : hence his struggles against heresy. But
A.D. 1549.] CHARACTERISTICS OF CALVIN. 105
the mass of the people cannot understand why this unity is
necessary ; they suppose that things would go on well enough
without it; and when Calvin employed severe measures to accom-
plish his purpose, they called him a persecutor; and if he
sought to secure the rights of the church at any price, they ex-
claimed, " he wants to rule like the pope." Even to this day
he is regarded by some as a clever politician, a Richelieu, a wise
man who sought his own aggrandisement. But further: Cal-
vin was moved in some respects by that grand spirit, the work-
ing of which it is so difficult for us to understand, its power
being now almost expended, the spirit of the middle ages. The
voice of a new life spoke within him : he existed in the season
of transition to another period of cultivation, which he partially
comprehended, and partially assisted to effect. If we be con-
scious of some discordant tones in his life, we must not -neglect
to consider, that after the course of some centuries, when the
world is animated by another spirit, history in our present mode
of existence will utter more than one discordant note, and that
because we are more or less in bondage to the spirit of our age,
which can never be absolutely pure. But the individual is not
responsible for the spirit of his times. The stern discourses of
Calvin on Predestination, as well as his treatises against here-
tics, may be regarded as having their origin in the necessities of
the age. The world was not yet worthy of the milder apostolic
spirit. As in the second part of this biography, anti-christianity
has shown itself in its gloomiest form, on the path of moral ex-
istence, so in the present epoch we have to contemplate the ad-
vance of a heresy, which exerted its whole force to mar, or blot
out, the first great truth, the very foundation-principle, of the
church. And how is it that they, who assume to themselves the
right of passing judgement on the history of heroic souls, do
not perceive that the mission of such spirits is necessary at cer-
tain periods to the salvation of the world ? This great man
occupied a far different position to that which is ordinarily sup-
posed. It is a melancholy thing when any one receives a com-
mission from God to proclaim his wrath, and teach a doctrine
most humbling to the human will. Calvin, on this account,
could not but be misunderstood and hated by the world. He
himself clearly saw it ; and it is very evident even to the present
day, that whenever an inclination exists to honour Calvin, Ser-
vetus appears as a pale spectre, to snatch the crown of honour
from his head. Exposed to the wrathful condemnation of the
106 CHARACTERISTICS OF CALVIN. [CHAP. I.
papists ; decried by the Lutherans, as if he were little better
than a child of Satan ; often mistaken and censured in his own
church, he has endured more injustice than any other religious
leader of modern times. So was he oppressed at the period of
which we are speaking, that he wished for death. " If I had
the choice/' he said, " I would far rather submit myself at once
to be burnt by the papists, than to be thus lacerated, without
ceasing, by my neighbours. They envy my great prosperity,
and will not let me enjoy a moment's rest, and yet they see me
almost overpowered by the weight of my occupations, tormented
by the saddest anxieties, and bowed down by insufferable claims.
My only consolation is, that death will soon afford me deliver-
ance from this oppressive struggle."
Such indeed has been the indignation often expressed against
his zeal, that since Beza, he has found no friend, during a
space of three hundred years, ready to exhibit to the world a
fitting representation of his faithful and untiring activity. The
unbelieving world regarded him as a troublesome zealot, of whom
it was better to speak as little as possible. There is something
puerile in the judgement which many have formed of his cha-
racter, and it is full time that justice should be done to Calvin
as well as to Servetus.
That which has chiefly tended to the erroneous view of his
conduct, may perhaps be found in the circumstance, that how-
ever prosperous he was in the accomplishment of his work, his
church was never well established in France. It continued op-
pressed and persecuted, so that the papists have continued to
the present day to load it with falsehoods and insult. Their
cunning and superior skill in such attacks have rendered them
more successful than we have been in the defence. We depend
upon the goodness of our cause, and are silent. It became usual
in Calvin's father-land to hate him : apparently he obtained not
his purpose ; and in Germany it was suspected that he was the
enemy of peace, though his whole strength was employed to
preserve it. All, in short, took the part of the idle world against
him. The French have latterly bestowed some attention upon
his character, but they have not yet found the key to his inner
spiritual life. Hence, in their review of his genius, they speak
only of his influence on the French language ; of his under-
standing and logical ability. They even term his whole life a
syllogism. In the same manner they describe his subtle policy,
his egoism, and especially his feeling of duty, but they rarely
A.D. 1549.] CHARACTERISTICS OF CALVIN. 107
allude to his convictions. It is thus that critics may be ex-
pected to do, whose heads are possessed with the prejudice, that
the manifestation of Calvinism is necessarily connected with
something wrong.
It may be hoped therefore that this work is published at a
right period. The hostility to Calvin has been re-awakened
with disgusting violence. Galiffe, in Geneva, has supplied all
his opponents with plausible arguments against him. We can
appeal only to the facts of his work. His judgements are palpa-
bly false, and he loses all claim to respect or credit when we
find him undertaking the defence of Bolsec. The Life of Calvin
by Audin, which appeared in France, and has since been trans-
lated into German, is a wretched party affair. A critique in the
c Literarische Zeitung' (1841, n. 34) affords a correct view of
this work : — " It is altogether unworthy of serious notice, being
in fact a sort of caricature of Dr. Henry's book, the contents of
which it has perfidiously pirated." The spirit indeed which
animates the little production here alluded to, shows that the
Romish church has made no step towards improvement since
the Reformation. But so long as that church thus avoids the
truth, and forms a league with shameless falsehood, it inflicts
upon itself the deepest wound, and stands irrevocably separated
from the evangelical church, which would so gladly form with
it but one body and one communion.
A later author*, who has employed himself much about the
old times, and is familiar with all the documents necessary to
the task, opposes the false judgements of others by his own well-
founded and earnest criticism. Agreeing with me, he says, —
" This man (Calvin) — descended from an ancient family, learned
and profound as few are, superior to the fear of man, seeking
nothing for himself, and hoping nothing, but full of ardour for
the glory of God, — became more and more the soul of the pro-
testant cause, the instrument in the hand of the Lord to give
firmness, durability, and a steady direction to the new church,
and to settle its doctrine on the surest principles of good sense
and reason.5' " People have often supposed that they were in-
sulting Calvin's memory by calling him the pope of protestant-
ism. He was so, but in the noblest sense of the expression,
through the spiritual and moral superiority with which the Lord
of the church had endowed him for its deliverance ; through his
unwearied, universal zeal for God's honour; through his wise
* Trechsel : Die Protestantischen Antitrinitarier, 1839, s, 177.
108 THE COUNCIL OF TRENT. [CHAP. II.
care for the edifying of the kingdom of Christ; in a word,
through all which can be comprehended in the idea of the papacy
of truth and honour. He had indeed his faults, but they were
either those of his time, or sprung from the peculiarities of his
character, the greatness, force and elevation of which our weak
degenerate race is unable to comprehend in the whole; and
which, instead of contemplating it on the bright side, it can only
judge of by the few dark spots on the surface."
CHAPTER II.
THE OUTWARD CONDITION OF THE CHURCH, AND CALVIN5S
CIRCUMSTANCES AT GENEVA IN THE YEARS 1550, 1551,
1552. HIS WORK ' DE SCANDALIS.' LETTERS TO CRAN-
MER AND MELANCTHON.
On the 10th of November 1549, Paul III., then in the eighty-
third year of his age, was called to render a final account of his
wicked deeds before God. The papal chair remained vacant till
the 7th of February 1550, when the choice of the conclave fell
on cardinal John Maria del Monte, the legate at Trent and
bishop of Palestrina. He ascended the pontifical throne by the
title of Julius III., and one of his first acts was to bestow the
cardinal's hat on a boy of sixteen, the keeper of his apes. This
occurrence furnished Calvin with a reason for writing in the fol-
lowing manner to Farel* : — " The pope whom they have made
and consecrated with so much care must be an extraordinary
monster, and in truth nothing could be better contrived than to
give such a moderator to a Tridentine council."
Charles lost no time in compelling the new pontiff to reassem-
ble the synod, while he himself prepared to assail the protestants
more violently than ever. A bitter edict appeared against them
in the Netherlands on the 19th of April; and in the diet, held
at Augsburg in July, the emperor directed all the princes of
Germany to proceed to Trent. This command was expressly
repeated on the 13th of February 1551, and on the 1st of May
* MS. Gen. 4 Non. Mart. 1550.
A.D. 1548-52.] CALVIN AND EDWARD VI. 109
in that year, the assembly recommenced its sittings. The pope
had ordered that the Swiss cantons should be courteously re-
quested to send deputies to the council ; but the divines of
Zurich, who were charged with the answer, sternly declared*,
" That they had ceased for thirty years to acknowledge the
authority of the pope ; that they would persevere in the profes-
sion of their evangelical ci*eed till convinced of error by the
Bible itself; and that the reformed church could not submit to
the council, though desired to do so by the pope, the emperor,
the princes, and the catholic cantons." The catholic cantons
were, in fact, disunited among themselves, and the king of
France declared his intention of protesting against the council,
on the ground of its want of catholicity.
We learns but from a somewhat doubtful source of informa-
tiont, that Calvin was proposed by the town of Strasburg as its
representative at the Council of Trent. It was now that he pub-
lished his Commentary on the Epistles ; and we read with satis-
faction the remarks which he made on the council in his dedi-
cation to the youthful king of England, Edward VI. : —
" Our Saviour was not more insulted by the servants of anti-
christ, when they gave Him a reed for a sceptre, and placed a
crown of thorns upon his head, than He was in the Council of
Trent. The assembly is but a vain shadow ; but it is regarded
by the pope as a sort of Hercules' club, wherewith he may over-
throw the Son of God, and destroy the rest of the church.
And if that teacher of impiety so shamelessly attacks the honour
of God and the strength of our salvation, is it meet that we
should betray our religion by our neglect ? No ! rather ought
we to suffer a hundred deaths than allow so barbarous an op-
pression of piety to remain unexposed." Then follows an exa-
mination of the several members of the synod : — " Among thou-
sands there may perhaps be found some who are partially on
the side of truth, as Peter Vergerius. But what is the result?
They are thrown into prison until they recant, or drink of that
cup which closes their mouths for ever. We do not wish to
avoid a legitimate council, but in this what sort of audience
could we expect? With what patience would they, who cannot
bear a gentle admonition, hear the thunders of the truth ? They
summon us indeed, but will they allow us to take even the
lowest seats ? In sooth there is no seat at all for any who pos-
* Ruchat, t. v. of the new ed. s. 420, 427.
t Pezel : Ausfiihrliche Erzahluog vom Sakramentstreit, s. 163.
110 ritlNCE MAURICE AND CHARLES V. [CHAP. II.
sess not the mitre. But let them sit, if we while standing be
only suffered to speak the truth. They will say that they give
free hearing to all ; and so they do, but it is only that we may
deliver our petitions, be immediately removed, and after a fierce
outcry for a few days, be called once more to hear our con-
demnation."
Calvin next examines the doctrine proposed, and shows what
was to be expected from " the blood-thirsty pope." " If they
raise the war-cry we must preserve our courage, and, armed with
his never-failing weapons, follow the standard of our great
leader. Every one, unless he obstinately close his eyes to the
truth, must acknowledge that the papacy is a detestable mon-
strosity, a mass of errors and wiles concocted by Satan."
A general movement was now about to take place throughout
Germany, and the "Dispersit superbos" was to receive a glori-
ous fulfilment. Whilst the emperor, in his arrogance, trod the
professors of the evangelical faith underfoot, those mighty plans
unfolded themselves in the breast of prince Maurice, by which
he was about to establish the freedom of the truth. Though of
too ambitious a spirit, he was a stanch Lutheran, and was now
greatly irritated and embittered against the emperor on account
of his treacherous conduct towards the unfortunate landgrave.
To deceive his old and experienced adversary, he well knew
that he must proceed with the utmost caution. He accordingly
took up his residence for the time in Saxony.
Melancthon had lately betrayed some degree of weakness.
For this he was severely reproached ; and Calvin wrote a severe
letter to Valentine Pacaus, a doctor at Leipzig, in which he pro-
tested against the indiscretion of which his friend had been
guilty*.
The course which Calvin took in German politics may be
gathered from his letter to Melancthon in 1551 1. He there
speaks of the conflict carried on with the town of Magdeburg,
at that time besieged by Maurice : it subsequently accepted
the Interim. Melancthon had declared himself in favour of the
adoption of all things that might be regarded as indifferent.
lie cared only for the fundamentals of Christianity: for this he
* Ed. Laus. Ep. 115. Ed. Amatel. p. 54, a.
f Ed. Laus. E|>. 117. Ed. Amstel. p. 54, b. Among other strong sen-
tences in this epistle occur the following: — " If I know anything of religion,
so much ought not to have been conceded by you to the papists ; " and, " I
would rather die with you a thousand times than see you survive the doctrine
which you have taught."
A.D. 1548-52.] CALVIN TO BULLINGER. Ill
was somewhat severely rebuked by Calvin ; but it is delightful
to see with what truth and candour, earnestness and confidence,
these great men wrote, each fully alive to the merits of the other.
Calvin was far from being of the number of those who have
mistaken Melancthon's character. He acknowledged the great-
ness of his mind ; he knew that he would have willingly laid
down his life a thousand times for the truth's sake ; but he was
vexed at the pliancy of his disposition.
Maurice had besieged Magdeburg for the sole purpose of
lulling the suspicions of the emperor. The divines considered
him an enemy to protestantism ; and he, to regain their respect,
protested against the Tridentine synod, declared his wish that
all its decrees should be once more examined, that the pro-
testants should possess a direct voice therein, and that the pope
should himself submit to its decisions. The emperor, on the
other hand, became every day more excited against the pro-
testants, and prohibited the preachers at Augsburg from touch-
ing on the disputed points. Those who offended against this
order were to be banished the city within three clays.
By these proceedings protestantism was almost suppressed in
Suabia. But it soon became evident that Charles was as anxious
to dissolve the old constitution of Germany as he was to secure
the overthrow of the evangelical church. In pursuance of these
designs he set out for Inspruck, whence he hoped to control the
movements of the council : he little expected the exalt avit hii-
miles which was in store for the reformers.
After the submission of Magdeburg, Maurice was appointed
its burggrave : his troops were in the highest spirits, and having
concluded a secret alliance with Henry II. of France, against the
emperor, he now hoped to free the landgrave of Hesse. It was
a favourite saying however of the acute politician Granvella,
that nothing very refined could proceed from the heads of the
drunken Germans.
Calvin carefully observed all these events. In the March of
1551 Bullinger* received from him a letter in which he says,
(i The proceedings of the emperor cause much anxiety to many
here, who are justly suspicious of his troops which are now pass-
ing the Alps. If he takes possession of this country, I shall
have nothing left to comfort me but the hope thai: the Lord will
remove me from this miserable world, and not forsake that flock
for whose safety I feci so much solicitude." He at this time
* Ed. Laus. Ep. 120. Etl. Amstci. p. 59, b.
112 beza's sickness. [chap. II.
continually turned his thoughts to England, and wrote to Somer-
set on behalf of Hooper. In a letter* to Farel he says, " There
is no real union between the pope and the Tridentine council.
With the former the French king has a secret understanding.
It is thought that the flame of war will again burst forth in Italy.
A Turkish ambassador is at this moment at the court of the king
of France, for the purpose of exciting him to hostilities. A
great fleet threatens Italy or Spain. Thus the Lord will leave
them no time to work evil to the church."
Calvin's wish to die was not fulfilled. It was destined that
he should see a great number of his fellow-labourers go before
him : as Joachim von Watt and Vadian in St. Gallen, well-known
as a philosopher, theologian and magistrate ; and the minister
Oswald Myconius. The famous Sebastian Minister at Basel,
and Caspar Hedio at Strasburg, had already died of the plague.
In the spring of this year Martin Bucer also departed this life in
England. Calvin speaks of him in the following words t '• —
" When I think how great a loss the church has suffered in this
man, I am torn with grief. He would have been of much ser-
vice to England ; and I had hoped even better things yet from
his writings. I daily see the church stripped of her true ser-
vants. Vadian's character was in high repute among the Swiss;
him also has the Lord taken from us." And in another letter
he writes J : — " May God grant that the rest, whom I should so
deeply lament, may survive me ! I shall then die in peace."
And now the news reached him that Beza was seized by the
plague. On this occasion he exclaims in his grief, and in his
peculiar style § : — " Truly I should be unworthy of the name of
a man if I did not love him, who loves me as a brother and
honours me as a father; — but the loss to the church distresses
me still more, for I saw in him, who is thus in the midst of his
course threatened by so sudden a death, a man, whose amiable
disposition, fine and noble spirit, and sincerity of mind, have
rendered him worthy of the love of all the faithful. I hope how-
ever that he may even yet be restored to our prayers." Again ||,
" Let us strengthen our souls until we shall have completed our
course. Once I feared that, though among those who are hasten-
* Ed. Laus. Ep. 121. Ed. Amstel. p. 60, a.
t Letter to Farel, July 15, 1551. Ed. Laus. Ep. 123. Ed. Amstel. p. 240, b.
% To Viret, May 1551. Ed. Laus. Ep. 122. Ed. Amstel. p. 60, b.
§ Ed. Laus. Ep. 124. Ed. Amst. p. 60, b. Prid. Cal. Jul. 1551.
|| Calv. Farello, 15 Jun. 1551. Ed. Laus. p. 123. Ed. Amstel. p. 240, b.
a.d. 1548-52.] melancthon's letter to calvix. 113
ing on, I should have to atone for the delay of others. Above
all things it comforts me, that you, whose zeal has overcome all,
have forgiven me and pardoned so much. Let it suffice, if we,
avoiding the extravagant errors of others, walk in the right path,
satisfied with knowing that if many are in advance, there are
still many behind us."
The dawn of the year 1552 beheld in Germany the beginning
of a new and eventful career ; while Switzerland and Geneva
were disturbed by fresh causes of uneasiness, and by a contro-
versy on some of the most abstruse points of Christian doctrine.
In the manifesto now issued by the elector Maurice, three things
were demanded ; namely, " protection for the evangelical church,
the integrity of the German constitution, and the liberation of
the landgrave.'3 Maurice rushed like a thunderbolt against the
old emperor, who, utterly unprepared for such an attack, fled
precipitately from Inspruck, and passed over the Alps. The
Tridentine council was dispersed with equal haste, the worthy
fathers flying in all directions. Thus the plans against Germany
were defeated, and the safety of the church was secured on the
basis of a general treaty. The king of France, who oppressed
his own evangelical subjects, was compelled, much against his
will, to assist, as the ally of the elector, in giving durability to the
German church.
But disquiet still universally prevailed. The true position of
the evangelical church may be learnt from a letter written to
Calvin by Melancthon, and in which he exhibits both his natural
disposition and the regard which he entertained for our reformer.
The satisfaction which the latter experienced when the letter
here referred to arrived from Wittenberg may be easily imagined.
" Honoured and dearest brother, — I am anxious to communi-
cate with you on matters of great moment, and this because I
hold in the highest esteem your judgement, and the candour
and purity of your soul*. I am now living like the 6V09 ev
a(f>r)Kiats ; but shall probably soon leave this world to join the
glorious company in heaven. If however my life be prolonged,
I may expect banishment; and should I be exiled, I have re-
solved to see and converse with you. I have pursued my theo-
logical studies with some success in this country, but they are
now interrupted by the plague and the war. I often lament the
phrenzy which exists among our rulers. May the Son of God
alleviate our misery and remove its cause ! If you would kindly
* Oct. 1, 1552. Ed. Laus. Ep. 137- Ed. Amstel. p. 66.
VOL. II. I
114 TREATY OF PEACE. [CHAP. II.
write to me often, you might send your letters to Dryander.
You will find in the inclosed that I have given a brief history of
this autumn. Farewell! — I have already answered Osiander.
There are now three Turkish pachas in Pannonia, accompanied
by two armies, which a short time since took several important
towns, and routed the forces of king Ferdinand. Maurice of
Saxony has marched towards Austria, against the Turks, plun-
dering in the meantime the margrave Albrecht, laying waste
Nuremberg, and levying contributions on Frankfort, towns in
the dioceses of Mainz and Triers. The army of the French king
is approaching the diocese of Liege, while the emperor Charles
assembles his army at Spiers, to restrain the margrave and the
French. The son of the earl of Mansfield, who is collecting an
army at Bremen in Saxony, is near at hand, and threatens to
invade the land of his birth, throwing the whole country into
disorder. Desolation hovers over all Germany; the churches
weep together in affliction ; theological studies are at a stand-
still; the tumultuous cry of insurrection increases on all sides.
I esteem you fortunate in your tranquillity, and pray God to
remove our afflictions/5 It was easy for Calvin to conclude,
from the first part of this letter, that Melancthon5s feelings were
not too deeply wounded by the freedom of his reproaches.
In May, Maurice had accomplished his enterprise against the
emperor. Negotiations were opened at Passau on the 26th of
that month, and on the 2nd of August a treaty of peace was
completed and signed. According to these arrangements it was
settled that an edict should be issued by a diet within six months,
in favour of religious liberty ; that until that time the party at-
tached to the Confession of Augsburg should, on no pretence
whatever, be exposed to molestation ; and that the imperial
court of judicature should act towards both parties with equal
justice. This was the first germ of order in the midst of those
tumults which Melancthon describes.
The moments of peace, so envied by his friend, Calvin em-
ployed in making regulations for the conduct of the church, in
literary labours, and in efforts to establish unity. It was in the
year 1550 that the arrangement, already alluded to, was made
for the more effectual pastoral superintendence of the people.
Mere preaching had been found insufficient. It was therefore
determined that the ministers should severally visit their parish-
ioners at home : they were to be accompanied by an elder, and
after giving instruction, were to require of each individual a state-
A.D. 1548-52.] ABOLITION OP FESTIVALS. 115
ment of his faith. According to the testimony of his fellow-
labourer, nothing could exceed the benefit derived from this
private and domestic catechising. The great importance which
was attributed to it by Calvin may be learnt from a somewhat
remarkable occurrence, related by himself. An Englishman at
Geneva had come to the conclusion in his own mind, that he
himself was Moses, and Calvin Aaron. The latter having
preached and greatly exerted himself one Christmas-day, in a
certain quarter of the city, where he was anxious to maintain
the system of particular inspection, was returning home op-
pressed with weariness. The Englishman however seized him,
and insisted that he should wait and listen to his wondrous
revelations. Calvin only escaped from the consequences of the
veneration which he had inspired, by humbly entreating to be
permitted first to go home and refresh himself.
Calvin passed a portion of this summer in the country, and
affectionately invited his friend Viret to visit him there.
An unexpected occurrence happened at Geneva about this
time (1550). The event alluded to affords striking evidence of
the disturbed state of affairs, and forcibly proves that the
church, in opposition to Calvin's principles, was completely sub-
jected to the state. One day, while sitting in his study, his
thoughts engaged on very different matters, information was
brought him that the Council of Two Hundred had suddenly
abolished all the festivals of the church, directing that even the
Lord's nativity should only be celebrated on the succeeding
Sunday. This affair, concerning which the consistory was not
even consulted, was the work of the laity alone, and was closely
connected with national feeling. The Bernese, after accomplish-
ing the expulsion of the ministers, had re-established in Geneva
the following festivals : — the circumcision, the annunciation, the
ascension, and Christmas-day. These the Genevese now at
once abolished, and by so doing highly incensed their allies.
Calvin, to whom this movement was generally attributed, did
not think it necessary to take any steps against it, recollecting
probably that the observance of holy days is nowhere expressly
enjoined in Scripture. He justified himself to Haller, the pastor
at Bern*, and fully proved that this change, though far from
being at variance with his own opinions, was nevertheless ac-
complished without his knowledge. It was rumoured however
that, had he had his wish, he would even have abolished the
* 4 Non. Jan. Ed. Laus. p. 118. Ed. Amstel. p. 62, a.
I 2
116 ABOLITION OF FESTIVALS. [CHAP. II.
observance of the Sabbath. On this subject he wrote as follows
to a minister in the Bernese territory* : — " Before my arrival all
festivals, Sunday alone excepted, had been abolished by Farel
and Viret. When we were banished, four festivals, together
with other observances, were again introduced. Although at
my return it would have been easy for me to have suppressed,
and that too with applause, all that had been done in my ab-
sence, I allowed things to remain as they were. I could, never-
theless, scarcely contain myself when I saw with how great per-
verseness the day of Christ's circumcision was celebrated at the
beginning of the year, whilst the day of the crucifixion was
almost totally neglected. The day of the annunciation also has
been kept holy by the people, and 1 have opposed this supersti-
tion with all the influence and energy I can command. Not-
withstanding this, I by no means wish to be classed with those
who would willingly see such festivals entirely disregarded. The
earliest of the evangelical Christians here were so opposed to the
innovations which were afterwards introduced, that I experienced
no mercy at their hands : to them, my moderation had the ap-
pearance of lukewarmness. This dispute indeed was at one
time carried so far, that recourse was had to the sword ; and as
each side carried its opinions to an immoderate length, that ap-
peared to me the most advisable course which lay at an equal
distance from either, namely, that all shops should be shut, and
labour discontinued until mid- day, when the people might re-
sume their customary occupations ; — a regulation similar to that
which was introduced nine years ago.
" The controversy however was not yet settled. Some of the
shops in the town were open and some shut, and perpetual dis-
putes existed between their respective owners. As no remedy
could be found for this, I appealed, at the beginning of the year,
to the council, and besought it to use its influence with the
people. But I said not a word respecting the suppression of
the festival. I was far more inclined to praise the moderation
which had led to the adoption of the Bernese practice. When
I heard of the measure passed by the council, in obedience to
the popular wish, I was astonished at so unexpected a proceed-
ing. Certain it is, that if any one had asked my opinion, I should
not have ventured to express it in such a manner. Nothing
new however has been introduced : we have only returned to
the old and better custom. Our church moreover is not the
* Ed. Laus. Ep. 12S. Ed. Amstel. p. 62, b.
A.D. 1548-52.] TREATISE DE SCANDALIS. 11 J
only one in which Sunday is the only festival observed. This
was the practice at Strasburg* ; but 1 did not think it right to
interfere, on my return, with the existing order/'
Bullinger* praises at Zurich the apostolic freedom, by means
of which the people of Geneva had succeeded in abolishing the
observance of Christmas. The church at Zurich, he says, had,
twelve years since, many festivals, but now observed only Sun-
day, and those of the nativity, the circumcision and the ascen-
sion of our Lord. They add Whitsunday to these merely on
account of the sacrament. The Genevese continued to observe
the regulations which they had introduced, with such tenacity,
that, in the year 1555 they subjected some persons who cele-
brated Christmas to twenty-four hours' imprisonment.
In 1551 a report was circulated that Calvin was dead, and
the papists proceeded, as they had done in the case of Luther,
to show their hatred of his name by proclaiming a day of thanks-
giving. A solemn procession of the canons of the cathedral
took place in his native town of Noyon. Calvin speaks of this
in a letter to Farelf, dated December 2, 1552 : — Ci You have no
doubt heard," he says, "that I survive my birth-place J. 1
cannot but weep for this ruined city, although last year, on the
report of my death, it offered up solemn thanksgivings, as if it
could triumph over Christ." Beza has incorrectly stated that
this occurrence took place in 1556. A similar course had been
pursued, some time before, when Luther was falsely reported to
be dead. The reformer has given an account of this affair, with
his own remarks §.
Calvin was busily employed at this time with his work De
Scandalis. Beza connects this undertaking with the movement
at Geneva respecting the festivals, which had occasioned offence
to many, and hindered the advancement of God's kingdom.
But Calvin only took advantage of these circumstances as afford-
ing a good opportunity for publishing his book. We see from
the preface that it had been for some time expected, and was
the result of his anxious desire to establish unity, so injured by
the existence of scandals. He enumerates them in this work,
and shows that the church was disturbed by them from the bc-
* Calv. Epp. Ed. Laus. Ep. 129. Ed. Amstcl. p. 63, a.
t Ed. Laus. Ep. 140, towards the end. Ed. Amstcl. p. 67.
X Noyon had been lately destroyed by fire.
§ Marheineke, Reform. Gesch. t. iv. s. 325.
118 TREATISE DE SCANDALIS. [CHAP. II.
ginning. Of the comprehensive plan of this work he had already
spoken to Farel, August 19, 1550.
The preface to the treatise De Scandalis is well worth reading.
Calvin dedicated the work to Laurence de Normandie (lieutenant
du roi a Noyon), and suggested to him many topics of conso-
lation. Laurence had resigned country, honours and the world
for the sake of the Gospel ; and had left Noyon at the same time
as Calvin's family. He had lost within a brief space of time,
his father, his wife, and his little daughter ; and he was almost
tempted to believe that the curse of God attended his change
of religion. Calvin consoled him with the recollection of what
his wife had said on her death-bed*.
Calvin published this work in both Latin and French. A
scandal is whatever hinders us from pursuing the right path, or
causes us to stumble. Now Christ himself is a rock of offence,
because men stumble at him. There are three species of scan-
dals : — 1. The first are derived from doctrine. To the wise of
this world the Gospel is itself foolishness, and this is the case
with its fundamental article, namely predestination. 2. When
the Gospel is preached^ sects arise, and controversies among the
teachers. 3. Another class of scandals spring from moral depra-
vity, hypocrisy, the ingratitude and vanity of worldly professors.
Against the first of these three species of scandals Calvin
argued with great force, showing the folly of those who take
offence at the Gospel because of the simplicity of its language.
He next speaks of the doctrines which commonly create most
disgust, as that of the two natures in Christ ; of the salvation
which we obtain through his sufferings alone ; of the blessing
enjoyed by his becoming a curse for us ; and of our righteous-
ness as existing in God only, and not in ourselves. He also
speaks of the cross of Christ, of self-denial, and of constancy in
times of persecution. We quote the following admirable pas-
sage : — " Let us meditate on this, that however low the outward
state of the church may be, it still shines in inward beauty.
Though shaken upon earth, it stands fast before God and the
" I can wish for no better medicine than those excellent words which she
spake when rendering up her spirit. She held me by the hand, and thanked
God that He had led her from a place where she would not have been suffered
to die in peace. ' O how happy I am that I have been delivered from that
cursed slavery of Babylon, and am now about to be delivered from my last
bondage ! How would it be with me now were I still in Noyon, and dare
not open my lips to declare my belief ?' I know not which was greater,
her faith or her humility."
A.D. 1548-52.] TREATISE DE SCANDALIS. 119
angels ; wretched after the flesh, it is rich in spiritual blessed-
ness. Even so we see that Christ lay in the manger, in the
greatest poverty, while angels were singing his praise in the
heavens. The star gave notice of his glory, and the wise men
from distant lands felt his power. When Satan tempted Him,
hungering in the wilderness, and when the bloody sweat dropped
from his forehead, angels were at hand ready to minister unto
Him. At the moment when He was about to be taken pri-
soner, his voice cast down the foremost of his enemies; and
while He was hanging upon the cross, the darkened sun pro-
claimed that He was the Lord of the universe. The graves
opening, declared that He was the Lord of life and death. In
this day, when we behold Him suffering in his body (the church)
through the pride and insults of the wicked ; oppressed by their
tyranny; exposed to their abuse; driven to and fro by their
rage, none of these wonders can move us. We ought therefore
to do our utmost to keep in mind, that the church is appointed
to struggle continually under the cross, as long as we remain in
this present world."
Another cause of offence is the poverty of the church, and the
conflicts to which it is perpetually exposed. Calvin, in reply,
describes the sufferings and oppressions which the people of
Christ have had to endure from the beginning. All these things
proceed from the disobedience of mankind, the great hindrance
to the grace of God, as shown by history. Still, in the end,
grace is always mighty and victorious, and that even in the
times of antichrist. It is necessary that the church should
suffer affliction, in order that our pride may be humbled.
Hence the melancholy termination of the religious war in Ger-
many.
"At the time when the knowledge of the Gospel was most
widely diffused in Germany, and when those who most zealously
upheld it, seemed to stand firm ; when that war was undertaken
which had so lamentable a termination, and I saw that all our
friends were inspired by the most lively hope of success ; I often
said in my sermons, that the victory which we seemed on the
point of gaining would be more perilous to us than anything
which the enemy could do against us ; for, certainly, no affliction,
however heavy, could injure us so much as a too-triumphant
Gospel. It would have been disproportioncd to our strength.
I do not repent having spoken thus."
After expressing his feelings on the fall of many who had
120 TREATISE DE SCANDALIS. [CHAP. II.
renounced their faith, he thus speaks of the elector John : —
ce There are others who have shown how invincible is the power
of faith when strengthened by the Spirit of God. We could
never have supposed, had not the cross been laid upon him, that
there was such an heroic feeling in the duke of Saxony as that
with which God has inspired him, in order that he might be-
come an example to all times."
Calvin next speaks of the scandals which pertain to those who
ascribe their sins to God, or who stumble at the doctrine of
predestination. He says well: — "As we offend God when we
endeavour to penetrate secrets which He is pleased to hide from
us, so is it our duty to hearken with all humility to what it is
his will to tell us, and to refrain from any deeper scrutiny of the
mystery. True christian prudence consists in this, so to be-
ware of vain curiosity, that we may never wish to know more
than that which Scripture reveals. Certain it is, that God "has
hidden nothing from us but what it would be useless or super-
fluous for us to know, or what might surpass our power of com-
prehension."
The scandals next described are those occasioned by the pub-
lic preaching of the Gospel. Men are offended because the
Gospel often gives rise to strife and war. Calvin here speaks in
defence of war, when it is carried on for the interest of souls.
He does not however seem to be quite consistent with himself
on this point : — " I willingly allow," he says, " that if the slavery
of the body only were in question, it were better to endure it
than cause any great disturbance or bloodshed ; but when the
everlasting fate of our souls is concerned, we must never regard
peace as sufficiently precious to induce us to preserve it at such
a sacrifice. Still worse is it to endanger the Gospel, to sacrifice
the honour of God's Son, and of his kingdom, in order to keep
well with the world. It were far better that heaven and earth
should be cast into the abyss, than that the glory given Him by
his Father should be lessened. Shall we, to save life, forsake the
Author of existence ? To have peace with men, shall we make
war with God? To save ourselves from the assaults of the
wicked, shall we separate ourselves from Christ, who has recon-
ciled men and angels to God the Father ? This would be a very
unwise proceeding."
Christ foretold that there would be wars. Hence the justifi-
cation of his religion, when it has been the occasion of wars and
commotions, in opposing the papacy. " Must pure and genuine
A.D. 1548-52.] TREATISE DE SCANDALIS. 121
religion be less esteemed because it has dragged this horrible
serpent out of its hole?" Calvin speaks in this passage of cer-
tain enemies of the Gospel under the name of Agrippa, Ville-
neuve* and Dolet. He mentions Rabelais also among others.
God warns us through such men, and heresies therefore can be
no proper cause of offence. They are all blinded by their pride
and haughtiness. This was the case with Michael Servetus,
who, as well as his doctrine, is here characterized. Thus the
libertines also gave cause of scandal by their converting christian
freedom into licentiousness.
And further, he speaks of the scandal occasioned by the
wicked who live among the good, and more especially against
wicked, carnal ministers. The Gospel however is not chargeable
with their guilt. Offences appear throughout the entire history
of the Gospel. But the wicked must ever be mingled with the
good, that the faith of the latter may be proved.
Offences are also created by those who allow themselves to be
easily enticed from the profession of the truth. The example of
such persons must be opposed by that of those who were willing,
at the same time, to become martyrs for the Gospel. God has
granted strength for this purpose not to men only, but also to
women, who sometimes even surpass men in fortitude. " We
learn from church history/' he observes, " that no better examples
of courage can be found than those afforded by the women in
Artois and in the Netherlands."
Another fruitful source of scandals exists in the controversies
between the various teachers of the church. Calvin particularly
instances the unhappy sacramentarian dispute. " I can say with
truth, that I have found to my grief what a contrivance of the
devil this was to keep afflicted consciences in a state of per-
plexity. But as I have since learnt, that I was held back rather
through my own weakness than by any actual obstacle, I shall
not hesitate to assert the same of others."
" The papists contend daily on all the points of their religion,
and their books show that they as constantly support different
views. They assert, on the other hand, that we are not in agree-
* Villanovanus was probably not Servetus. Several learned men of this
name lived at the time of Servetus, in Spain, France and Italy. Rabelais
speaks of a Villeneuve (Pantagruel, liv. iii. c. 13), and calls him ' Le doctc
Villanovanus, Francois.' Postell also wrote a book in which he endeavoured
to show that the Mohammedans and Lutherans agree, and that Villanovanus
wrote the book ' De Tribus Prophetis ;' but this same author defended Servetus.
The author of the Dialogue between the Vatican and Calvin names Villano-
vanus, as Calvin himself does, with Agrippa and Doletus.
122 TREATISE DE SCANDALIS. [CHAP. II.
ment among ourselves. The dispute, however, between Luther
and Zvvingli shall not keep us from the Gospel, for we see that
Paul and Barnabas, and Paul and Peter could fall into sharp
contention with each other. I dare indeed assert, that when
men's hearts arc not too much heated by dispute, or are not be-
fooled by evil suspicions, means may readily be found to reconcile
them." Calvin adds, that all the evangelical parties in the church
had reverted to his views of the Lord's Supper, and differed from
each other only in expression.
Another class of scandals is derived from the slanders of the
wicked ; and Calvin here enters into a justification of the protest-
ants against the catholic teachers, frequently expressing himself
in a very original and characteristic style. Thus, for example,
in his observations on the Romish fasts : " They here follow
their usual practice, drinking right well the day before, that their
hearts may not sink too low on the fast-day. So also, being
obliged to fast, they first eat till they are ready to burst from
fear of hunger in the evening. The following day they eat
double to cool their revenge. Having thus sported with God,
as with a child, they are bold enough to accuse us of having
abolished fasting and mortification." "The papists wish to
make us believe that the dispute which we carry on with them
is nothing but a conflict, through which we seek to possess our-
selves of women." Here follows Calvin's justification of his own
marriage : " Even while I lived in subjection to the pope, I was
never bound not to marry. But when God freed me from that
bondage, I remained for a long time without taking a wife. At
length I found so excellent a one, that I had reason to praise
God for his giving her to me ; but when she was taken away, I
was far from hastening to marry again. And with what do these
good champions of chastity charge us ? That Luther, inspired
by lust, cast himself into marriage, and led the whole swarm of
priests, monks and nuns after him, involving them in the same
offence ! Can anything be more ridiculous than to argue that
Romanism must be forsaken unless we can live in chastity?"
The work concludes with an admonition to unity. It is
especially rich in thought, and must have possessed great prac-
tical utility for the times in which it appeared.
We must here pause for a while, to consider the ruling ideas
of this particular epoch. As we saw Calyin in the first period
of his course striving for doctrine, and in the second for such a
system of church discipline as might give stability to his reforma-
A.D. 1548-52.] CHURCH UNITY. 123
tion, so now we are to contemplate him in eager pursuit of the
third great object of his labours.
Who desires not unity in the church? The Lord himself
prayed for unity, and his prayer must, sooner or later, be ful-
filled. Numberless efforts have been made to this end. But
what are the right means ? That is the difficult question. Ideally,
the church of Rome might be supposed to exhibit the unity de-
sired ; but its unity is a falsehood, and the means by which it
has been sought are antichristian. There can be no grander
idea than that of a theocracy, as held by the popes, — of a king-
dom ruling by the Spirit, and the design of which is to establish
peace and faith among the nations. Sublime was the end which
the church seemed to have reached when the rude strength of
the people was opposed by its firm barrier; when there was a
union of all, even of the most distant churches, supported, quick-
ened and governed by Rome, and when no change was to be
looked for in their doctrine. Hence it was that the whole of
Christendom seemed inspired by one spirit ; hence its power to
undertake such mighty enterprises against the Mohammedans ;
and hence the establishment of monasteries as asylums for science
and misfortune.
But what were the means employed to secure this unity? It
was necessary that the civil power should be crippled ; that con-
sciences should be enslaved, and their most secret movements
paralysed by the medium of confession. The servants of the
church, separated from the world and brought up for the church
alone, were compelled to a celibacy which opposed the rights of
nature, not forgetful to avenge itself. But while free from and
independent of the state, responsible only to the head of the
church, secured from poverty, and living even in princely splen-
dour, they might cherish the hope of rising to the highest stations
in the world, and could thus combine ambition with an apparent
apostolic humility.
The Inquisition pursued its revengeful course without any
regard to the rights of states or the duties of charity; and al-
though it succeeded in effecting an outward unity, whilst the
war was still raging within, the wrong means employed, and the
schism which resulted therefrom, produced the most distressing
consequences to the visible church. Its unity had been broken,
and it was already divided into fragments, as Calvin showed in
his defence against Sadolet, who accused him of disturbing the
communion of the saints, and in his reply to those who sum-
124 UNION OE THE REFORMED CHURCHES. [CHAP. II.
moned him before the judgement-seat of God as a betrayer of
the papacy.
But the question so difficult for the protestants to answer was
now asked, namely, how they could preserve the holy unity of
which they spoke ? for it was evident that neither a church nor
communion could exist without unity. But for this, each party
would have its own church, and the body would be torn into
numberless fragments. That both Luther and Calvin were con-
vinced of this fact, appears from the care with which they un-
ceasingly opposed the authors of those false notions which every
day brought forth. In that remarkable period, upon which we
are now entering, when the churches are more than ever divided,
and when principles are contrasted with each other in the rudest
antagonism, this subject of the unity of the church possesses a
continually increasing interest.
Calvin entered upon the discussion with a holy earnestness
peculiar to himself. He not only strove for unity in his contest
against error, but, as far as it was practicable, he promoted it by
the settlement of the controversy on the Lord's Supper ; through
the formularies and conventions, which deserved so much re-
spect ; and especially by means of the synodal intercourse with
France, the first great and apostolic source of all church com-
munion. This was peculiarly the case internally, because the
general synod settled the disputes which existed on particular
dogmas, and had authority to interpret the Scriptures ; and, ex-
ternally, because it had the control of worldly affairs; in the
larger states the episcopal element being combined with the
synodal.
But Calvin's thoughts were now occupied with a still wider
plan, that, namely, of uniting the several reformed churches, as
those of France, Scotland and Germany, in one body. This
appears from a letter which he addressed to Cranmer. Beza
would fain have pursued the path thus opened to him ; and if
the divines who formed the assembly at Dort, the last of the re-
formed synods, peculiarly so called, or if protestantism even would
not consent to this unity and entireness, yet does the praise pro-
perly belong to Calvin of having shown the way by which it
might have been attained. Unity in the Holy Ghost was the
cherished object of Calvin's will. It was not the offspring of
private intellectual inquiry, the principle falsely ingrafted upon
protestantism. The Calvinistic rule is the rightful medium
between papal tyranny and protestant anarchy. "Evangelical
A.D. 1548-52.] UNION OF THE REFORMED CHURCHES. 125
truth/' says Calvin to Sadolet, " is the bond. May God grant
that you and yours may see that there is no other bond of union
but this, that Jesus Christ may deliver us from the present evil
world, and bind us together in his love, so that we may grow up
by his word and Spirit as having one heart and one soul !" This
principle of a mystic-spiritual union with the Lord is finely em-
bodied in Calvin's doctrinal teaching, but less manifestly so in
its practical development.
In the August of 1555 Calvin received a letter from Peter
Martyr*, in which he states his wish to have Calvin's opinion
on the union of the faithful in Christ. Calvin in his answer very
distinctly asserted the existence of this communion. He was
not however, as has been intimated, always in agreement with
himself on this subject, in so far as phraseology is concerned ;
and the expressions which he sometimes used excited against
him a more than ordinary degree of hatred.
It appears that in the midst of all the differences about doc-
trine which prevailed, this idea of a visible unity always employed
his thoughts. The work of which we have been speaking, De
Scandalis, had its origin in this feeling ; and Calvin now looked
to the greatest men of the time, hoping that by arousing their
attention to the distracted state of the church, a communion
might be effected which would still further diffuse the principles
involved in the Consensus Tigurinus. We shall hereafter see
how constantly Buliinger strove for the same object; while in
the year 1561 Beza, at the conference held at St. Germain, urged,
in the name of the reformed, the necessity of a general council,
in which not the pope but the Scriptures might decide the
questions discussedf.
In the work De Scandalis, Calvin shows that the catholics
accused the reformed as the authors of schism, whereas they
themselves were not united, and failed to employ the proper
means to establish concord. Calvin was convinced, in his own
mind, that he had discovered the means for accomplishing this
great end. The tone of his letters both to Cranmer and Me-
lancthon clearly indicates that he felt himself called, by an inward
witness, to the highest place in the future conduct of the Refor-
mation. His words to the two distinguished men above-named
are well-worthy of attention. To Cranmer he writes j, —
" In the present distracted state of the church, you suppose
* Ed. Laus. Ep. 208. Ed. Amstel. p. 100, a.
t Hist. Eccles. iv. pp. 716, 717.
\ Ed. Laus. Ep. 126. Ed. Amstel. p. 61, a.
126 UNION OF THE REFORMED CHURCHES. [CHAP. II.
that no better means can be employed than that pious, sensible
men, brought up in the school of God, should unite in setting
forth a common confession of christian doctrine. Satan seeks
by manifold wiles to extinguish the light of the Gospel. The
dogs in the pay of the pope cease not to bark, that they may
drown the voices of those who preach the word of truth. Such
is the madness, such the impiety which everywhere prevails, that
religion can hardly any longer be protected from daring mockery.
Even those who have not declared themselves as its open ene-
mies are yet so bold and rash, that, if they be not chastised, they
will soon involve everything in horrible confusion. Nor is this
state of feeling (the result, in one respect, of immoderate conceit,
and in another of extravagant curiosity) confined to the people
alone. Still more lamentable to say, it is extending among the
clergy. But the Lord will himself communicate to us the unity
of a true faith, and that in some wonderful manner, and by
means altogether unknown to us ; even as He has done from the
beginning of the world, so that it may not be destroyed by the
strife of men. He will not however suffer those whom He has
placed as watchmen to slumber. They are his servants, and by
their means the pure doctrine of his Word ought to be preserved
from all unholy mixtures, and so handed down to posterity.55
Calvin expressed a wish that Cranmer would appoint some
place in England where the heads of all the protestant churches
might meet, and having settled the main articles of belief, might
lay the foundation of a permanent union. " One of the greatest
evils of our time," he says, " is that the churches are so widely
separated from each other, that there is not even a temporal or
human intercourse carried on between them ; we may well,
therefore, be silent as to a holy communion of the members of
Christ, which is in everybody's mouth, but no sign of which
exists in the heart. This is partly the fault of the princes. The
body of Christ is torn asunder because the members are sepa-
rated. As far as I am concerned, if I can be of any use, I will
readily pass over ten seas to effect the object in view. If the
welfare of England alone were concerned, I should regard it as a
sufficient reason to act thus. But at present, when our purpose
is to unite the sentiments of all good and learned men, and so,
according to the rule of Scripture, to bring the separated churches
into one, neither labour nor trouble of any kind ought to be
spared*.55
Cranmer, it seems, fully comprehended Calvin's idea, and was
* Ed. Laus. Ep. 127. Ed. Amstel. p. 61, b.
A.D. 1548-52.] CALVIN AND CRANMER. 127
anxious to establish, at least in England, the proposed plan.
Calvin rejoiced at this, and reminded the prelate of the power
which his dignity afforded him to excite his zeal : — " Beware that
you may not have to charge yourself with many grievous accu-
sations, if, through negligence or delay, you leave the world in
its present distracted state. Besides the waste of church pro-
perty, which is wicked enough, there is a still more unpardon-
able crime committed. The public income of the church is
employed to fill the bellies of a multitude of idle fellows, engaged
to sing vespers in a foreign language. I will say nothing more
than that, if you allow yourself to appear as a supporter of such
an abuse, at open variance with the true order of the church,
nothing can be more absurd. Although I doubt not but that
this must appear so to yourself, and must have been so repre-
sented by the excellent Peter Martyr, yet the difficulties with
which you have to contend are so numerous, that it may not be
useless on my part to excite your resolution."
A letter from Cranmer, dated March 20, 1552, shows that he
had adopted Calviirs views, and was anxious to secure unity of
opinion on the doctrine of the Lord's Supper. He imparted his
wish to Melancthon and Bullinger. The whole plan was de-
stroyed, it seems, by the death of Edward VI.
Calvin now also directed the attention of Melancthon to the
necessity of some effort for securing unity of doctrine. The
letter* which he wrote on this occasion expressed the feelings
of his innermost heart and conscience. He knew well what
position he occupied, and that their friendship could not be
interrupted without injury to the church. Hence he reproved
him in gentle terms for his vacillation in respect to the doctrine
of election, which at this time greatly occupied his thoughts,
and because his opponents appealed to the doubtful sentiments
of Melancthon, who even refused to admit the cautious expres-
sions of the Consensus Tigurinus.
It has been already stated how Calvin, in the year 15 13, con-
troverted the opinions of Pighius, and dedicated his work to
Melancthon. A Benedictine monk in Italy, Georg Siculus,
had undertaken to confute Calvin ; but no sooner, as we are
about to relate, had the controversy on election broken out in
Geneva, than the people of that city united to uphold the
doctrine, and obtained Calvin's consent to their views. But
Melancthon refused to adopt either the Zurich or the Gcnevese
* Nov. 29, 1552. Ed. Laus. Ep. 141. Ed. Arnstel. p. 66, b.
128 OPPOSITION TO CALVIN. [CHAP. III.
system*. On the 26th of August, 1554, Calvin again wrote to
him to obtain his consent to the doctrine, and thus to establish
unity f.
CHAPTER HI.
THE FIRST GREAT CONTROVERSY. THE DISPUTE RESPECT-
ING PREDESTINATION. BOLSEC.
The letter to Melancthon clearly shows what the zeal of the
reformer for unity, in regard to this important controversy, was
likely to effect. Calvin, through his love for the doctrine of
election, has been almost wholly misunderstood by church his-
torians. We must either indeed view him as an unimpassioned
controversialist, or distinctly recognize the part which he took
in this matter as pointed out to him by a higher Spirit. This
doctrine, in fact, exhibiting as it does the peculiarity of the
evangelical in opposition to the catholic church, — namely that
man is saved not by his works, but by the grace of God, — neces-
sarily exercises a very extensive influence in the former. It was
therefore the bounden duty of its advocate to defend it against
all opponents, and to insist upon its introduction into the con»
fession of the several churches, as was done, at a subsequent
period, in France, Scotland and Holland, and still later in the
case of one-half of the Methodist community.
A dispute on this subject was begun at the commencement of
the year 1551. One of the Bernese ministers, indignant at find-
ing that three French refugees, who resided in his village, went
on the Sunday to hear Calvin, declared J, that they were objects
of suspicion, for that they worshiped the inventor of a new, false
and impious doctrine as an idol. " Ke attacks me," said Calvin,
" like a raging papist," and the circumstance was brought, at
his instance, before the Bernese council. " How sincere and
* Beza v. Calv. " Quin etiam his de rebus ita scribere coeperat Phil.
Melancthon, ut quamvis antea Calvini atlversus Pighium libro diserte sub-
scripsisset, tamen Genevenses quasi Stoicum fatum invehentes notare quibus-
dam videretur."
f Ed. Laus. Ep. 179- Ed. Amstel. p. 82, a. "Although I grieve that no
reply has been received from you to my last letter."
J MS. Tigur. 1551.
A.D. 1551.] GALEAZZO CARACCIOLT. 129
faithful I have been/' he said, " in the declaration of the truth,
will our excellent father Musculus readily testify. How earnestly
I have sought to establish peace and union, will right-minded
men generally acknowledge. That unsavoury monster has en-
deavoured to pervert the Consensus between the Zurichers and
Bernese, in order to prove that I am the author of an impious
doctrine ; and that he, who is but a mole, is alone endued with
the power of seeing right/'
Calvin appealed to the Bernese, in the name of Christ, and
called upon the pious exiles to defend him against his barbarous
accuser, the monk, George Siculus,— his opposers being now so
numerous, and his time fully occupied with his work against
Pighius*. The mysterious subject of election was at present
debated in all circles at Geneva. Exiles flocked to that city
from every quarter ; and our attention is called to two men, of
very different intellectual character, who were thus brought
together.
The one was a distinguished Neapolitan, Galeazzo Caraccioli,
Marquis of Vico, whose history affords us an instance of the
most wonderful triumph of grace over nature f. The other was
Bolsec, who exhibits, on the contrary, the victory of our com-
mon nature over truth and honesty. Vico was descended from
the ancient race of the Caraccioli of Capua. His mother, a
Caraffa, was sister of Pope Paul IV. Vico heard Peter Martyr
at Naples, and from that time his mind had no rest. He was
brought up in the court of the emperor, and his parents married
him to a woman of great worth, hoping thereby still to keep
him in the fashionable world. But Vico resisted their tears
and persuasions, overcame all temptations, and firmly resolved
within himself, after a severe struggle, to leave father, mother,
wife, children, the honours and riches of this world, for the
Lord's sake. He met Peter Martyr once again, when he had
become professor at Strasburg. Martyr again proved to him
that he must cease altogether from attending the mass. Vico
revered his aged father. His wife, who was united with him in
the tenderest affection, could not resolve to change her faith.
Grace triumphed, but it cost the heart of Vico indescribable
anguish to separate himself from his children. To accomplish
his5 purpose, it was necessary that he should leave his beautiful
country, his lordly palace, the court and its attractions, to be-
* MSS. Gen. Calvin to Virct, August 17, 1551.
t Ruchat, Hist, de la Reform. Suisse. Nouv. Ed. T. V. p. 449.
VOL. II. K
130 CHARACTER OF BOLSEC. [CHAP. III.
come an exile, to endure poverty and want, and to become an
object of aversion even to his friends. But grace was sufficient
for him. " I can now for love of Thee, O Lord, deny my-
self!" he at length exclaimed: "blessed be banishment and the
cross, which tear me away from the vanities, and the sins of the
world!"
It was only to some few friends that he dare trust his safety:
they left him on the borders of Italy. His family had been led
to suppose that he was going to the emperor. He arrived at
Geneva in April 1551 : Calvin received him with open arms,
and continued throughout his life to regard him with the
greatest esteem. He expressed this feeling for him in the de-
dication prefixed to his commentary on the Epistles to the
Corinthians, and the historians of Geneva bear witness that he
was an example of the sincerest piety. In Naples the agitation
produced by the announcement of his departure was universal :
nothing was left untried to bring him back. He answered that
his conscience would not allow him to live in the midst of Ca-
tholic superstition, and that he had sacrificed the glory of this
world, that he might not lose the glory which is eternal. At
length the emperor proclaimed him guilty of high-treason, con-
fiscated his possessions, and degraded his children. His aged
father threw himself in despair at the feet of the emperor, and
desired Caraccioli to come to him at Venice. He obeyed, com-
mending himself to the prayers of the whole church at Geneva.
His father received him lovingly, and did all in his power to win
him back ; but he answered firmly, that not even a father could
oblige him to prefer the honours and possessions of this world
to the glory of God. They separated for ever : Yico returned
to Geneva : grace had finally conquered.
In direct contrast with this remarkable man stood Jerome
Bolsec. He was born in Paris, and became a Carmelite monk.
Having cast aside his cowl, he was obliged to flee into Italy,
dreading the consequence of having spoken too freely respecting
the catholic church. The duchess of Ferrara had received him,
with her accustomed kindness, as a clergyman. But he became
a physician, married, and went to Geneva. There he became
acquainted with many persons of distinction, among others with
De Bourgogne, who had settled in that city at the earnest en-
treaty of Calvin. Bolsec, was, to. all appearance, a good Chris-
tian, and there are reason! to believe that he employed himself
at one time in compiling materials for the life of Calvin ; traces
A.D. 1551.] CHARACTER OF BOLSEC. 131
of such a collection being found at the beginning of his libel,
published at a later period. Not by any means vicious or despi-
cable at first, this man sank by degrees to the lowest depths of
error, and became the declared enemy of truth. He commenced
by discussing vehemently, in the different circles at Geneva, the
abstruse doctrine of election. Calvin admitted him to a con-
ference, and explained to him the nature of the subject, so dif-
ficult and profound, but without effect. Bolsec was called
before the consistory, and he was desired to consider the in-
consistency of his opinion ; but he refused to listen. But such
an opposition could not be tolerated in the midst of the reforma-
tion. It was the well-known custom at Geneva for a minister,
whether of the city or country, to preach every Friday, accord-
ing to his turn, in the cathedral ; the other ministers examining
and deciding upon the merits of the discourse. Any individual
also might at that time go up to the preacher, even in the church,
and make such observations as he pleased. This was allowed in
order to accustom the people to contend firmly for all points
connected with the reformation.
On the 16th of October the minister of St. Andrew's preached
to a crowded congregation, on St. John, chap. viii. ver. 47. " He
that is of God heareth God's words : ye therefore hear them not,
because ye are not of God." All those who are not of God,
resist him to the end, because God affords the grace of obedience
to his elect alone. As the preacher uttered this remark, a man
suddenly started up from the midst of the congregation, and
combated with unbecoming vehemence the doctrine which had
been thus advanced. All were silent. " How," he said, " can
you believe that God has determined the lot of a man before his
birth, destining this one to sin and punishment, and that one to
virtue and eternal reward? It is a false and impious notion,
which Laurentius Valla has started, namely, that the will of God
is the cause of all things, and that therefore the origin of all the
evils and all the sins which exist must be ascribed to him, as the
old poets feign with regard to Jupiter. Would you make of
God, the eternal and righteous one, a senseless tyrant? Would
you rob virtue of its glory, free vice from its disgrace, and the
wicked from the terrors of conscience ? "
He who spoke thus was the physician Bolsec. The fathers
of the church were cited in his speech, and he concluded by
exhorting the people, in the most seditious and abusive language,
not to allow themselves to be deceived by the clergy. He was
k 2
132 CALVIN AND BOLSEC. [CHAP. III.
probably induced to adopt this course by some of Calvin's
enemies.
A curious scene now took place. Bolsec had ventured to
act as he had done, because Calvin was not then present; but
just as he was in the midst of his speech, the reformer entered
the church. He was concealed by the mass of the people, and
listened, in secret, but with astonishment, to the attack made upon
his grand doctrine. Scarcely had Bolsec ended, when he pressed
through the crowd, hastened up to his opponent, and without
preparation proved at once his prodigious powers of argument.
He thundered against the antagonist with so many and such
apposite quotations from Scripture, and with so many passages
from Augustine, — he so assailed him with arguments, that all who
were present, it is said, blushed for the defeated monk. He
himself however appears to have felt no shame.
Among the hearers was the prefect of police : this officer
immediately apprehended Bolsec, as a seditious disturber of the
peace, and, the congregation having separated, led him off to
prison. Farel was also present, and admonished the people with
pious words. How great was Calvin's zeal ! On the same even-
ing the clergy assembled, and drew up seventeen questions, to
which the prisoner was to give an answer. A long and fruitless
dispute was carried on with him, both by word of mouth and by
writing. The affair was brought before the council. Bolsec ad-
hered firmly to his opinion, and seems to have believed that
many of the Swiss clergy had adopted his views. No judgement
therefore was pronounced, but the Swiss ministers were to be
asked their sentiments. Bolsec did not venture to oppose him-
self to this proceeding, but he thought the clergy of the chief
city far too united with Calvin to be impartial. He censured
Zwingli above all, and declared that Bullinger, Melancthon,
and Brenz were of his opinion. From the answer which Bolsec
gave in prison, it would appear that he was sincerely anxious to
discover the truth, and prayed God to enable him so to do.
This also appears from a poem which he wrote at that time.
In the fifth of the questions proposed to him he was asked,
" Whether he acknowledged that faith proceeded from the divine
election, and that the illuminated received such grace because
God had chosen them?" Bolsec answered, "Faith depends
not upon election, but election and faith go together. A man
cannot be considered as elect before he is beloved of God;
and before he is beloved, we must know for whose sake we are
A.D. 1551.] CONTROVERSY ON ELECTION. 133
beloved, that is, Jesus Christ. There are in God, who knows not
past or future, the three following truths ever present, — the union
of man with the Son through faith ; God's love to him, the love
which comes from faith ; and election, which rests on faith in
Christ. Many of the old doctors agree in this ; and so also the
three worthy men, Melancthon, Bullinger, Brenz."
Calvin speaks in the eleventh article of the wonderful counsel
of God, whose primal reason is not known to us ; and of the
doctrine of predestination, as not opposed to a sound human
understanding ; there being still left to the mind, looking behind
the veil, the possible deliverance of the reprobate, Bolsec how-
ever answered, that he would not on any account pretend to
look into these wonderful decrees of God. He proposed, on the
contrary, certain questions to Calvin, which are in some degree
interesting to all ages. They were such as represent the views
taken by a sound, natural understanding, with which the church,
which must go deeper if it would annihilate Pelagianism, cannot
agree. The questions thus proposed formed, it is probable, the
groundwork of Calvin's work on election, which appeared soon
after.
The Genevese council now addressed itself to the churches
of Zurich, Bern and Basel, and sent them a summary of the
errors of Bolsec, the chief of which were, that faith does not
come from election, but that election proceeds from faith. The
ministers of Geneva also wrote to the ministers of those cities.
It is interesting to see how all opposed the severer view of the
doctrine alluded to, and how Calvin in his turn attacked them
all. The remarks of the Basel theologians deserve notice : they
say that " God elected us in Christ before all time ; that he who
believes in Him is redeemed ; but that the Father draws not all ;
that some will not be drawn, and are therefore left in a state of
condemnation ; that this fact is clear, but that how it is so must be
left with God." " You see therefore," it is added, " our agreement
on this subject." Sulzer and Myconius subscribed the document.
A different feeling was expressed by the Bernese : they spoke
in a high tone, and preached a toleration to the Genevese not
then known to the world. The writing was subscribed by Mus-
culus, whom Calvin greatly loved, but who in this case agreed
with the rest in opposing him. The Bernese commenced the
letter very cautiously, spoke of the necessity of concord, but
not to the sacrifice of charity. We quote the following : " The
Genevese ought to treat Bolsec with gentleness, and never lose
134 BOLSEC AND THE BERNESE. [CHAP. III.
sight of the love of Christ. For He loves not only the souls of
the faithful, but those even of the erring, of whom He takes
more especial note. It commonly happens that, when we un-
dertake the defence of a doctrine with peculiar zeal, we forget the
claims of Christian love, and fail to keep in sight the conduct
which becomes the disciples of Christ, as if the spirit of charity
could not consort with zeal for the truth/5
To this is added an expression of praise for the earnestness of
the Genevese ; but they are besought " to consider how easily the
mind of man can fall into error, how unwillingly it submits to
control, and how much more likely kindness than severity is
to gain its object." In reference to Bolsec it is said, " You are
well aware how much distress this controversy has occasioned
many religious people, who, when they find in Scripture the
mention of a common pardon and grace, have not sufficient
penetration to understand the mysteries of predestination, and
the blindness and wickedness of the human heart, and therefore
suppose that the hardening of the sinner cannot be ascribed to
God without blasphemy."
These remarks are followed by a reference to those passages
of Scripture in which mention is made of a common grace. Great
importance is ascribed to them, and it is added, that the doc-
trine of predestination ought to be spoken of with much caution :
it is not the milk for children, but the strong meat for men.
" And Jerome plainly shows that even he, in this respect, per-
tained to the Meak ; for he says, that he dared not press into the
secret counsels of God. Bolsec's answers indicate that he is not
a bad man. Were there no strife existing, he might, it is pro-
bable, be led to embrace higher views."
This was a strong sermon for Calvin. The Bernese, it seems,
were fearful that the matter might be carried too far, Bolsec being
still in prison. Even Museums had remarked, in one of his
letters, " that people should be brought back to the truth with
gentleness, not with severity or with bonds and imprisonment."
The latter words were, for some reason, crossed out.
Such language was novel for that period. But two years
afterwards these parties agreed in the condemnation of Servetus ;
and at a later period the Bernese themselves condemned Gentilis.
Haller thus expressed himself to Bullinger, in reference to Cal-
vin*: " We have tried to pray, that God may have mercy upon
* MS, Tig, Dec. 5, 1551.
a.d. 1551.] calvin's zeal for election. 135
us, and silence these disputes ; for I see no article of faith on
which it is more perilous to strive than this."
The Zurich ministers answered the council of Geneva more
definitely than those of Basel. Their reply is well worthy of
notice, it being in the character of an official statement, as a sort
of renewed Consensus Tigurinus, in which light it has been fre-
quently viewed. The letter is in Bullinger's handwriting, and
will be again referred to. Those in whose name he wrote say,
"The Genevese council may perhaps not know" (this expres-
sion is curious — the council must have known it, as well as Bul-
linger) "that they are agreed on the subject of the Lord's Supper.
Their confession on the doctrine of election follows. The terms
used are cautious*, the main point in the dispute — the repro-
bation of the wicked by God's decree — being avoided. Bullin-
ger's allusion to Zwingli is interesting. " Bolsec errs in suppo-
sing that Zwingli believed in the necessity of sin. People should
read all his works t"- &c.
Bullinger's private letters were equally mild : thus he warned
Calvin : " Believe me, many persons are distressed at what you
have said in your Institutions on predestination, and connect it
with what Bolsec says on Providence from Zwingli's book." To
this he adds, "According to the meaning of the apostle, God
wills the happiness of all men J."
Calvin was still less content with the Zurich ministers than
with those of Basel §. "My dear Farel," said he, alluding to
the Bernese, " I cannot tell you how this barbarity distresses me.
There is no more humanity among us than among wild beasts.
Edicts have been sent forth (that is, from Bern) which forbid
the refugees to have anything with us in common."
We here see Calvin standing alone on the field of conflict,
with characteristic firmness and unshaken conviction. Opposed
to him were all his old friends, Bullinger, Haller, Melancthon.
It is evident, as Bolsec said, that they adhered to the weaker
party. Impelled by an irresistible inward feeling, Calvin de-
clared, " that the honour of his God, and the salvation of the
world, depended upon this doctrine, and that they who opposed
* " Constituimus enim electionem, qua Deus pcccatores in Christo elegit,
omnino esse gratuitam. Elegit nos in Christo, antequam jacerentur funda-
menta raundi."
f And further: "There are many of us still living, who heard him preach
on this subject, and we know that he always spoke of it with great piety."
X MS. Tig. 1st Dec. 1551. " Deum bene velle omnibus hominibus."
§ MS. Bern. Sth Dec. 1551.
136 STRIFE AND CONTROVERSY. [CHAP. 111.
it assailed God : that unity on this subject must be established,
cost what it would." These expressions remind us of what Ma-
thesius said on Luther's extraordinary nature: — " Great men have
great thoughts. The One Spirit has many operations ; and we
who are destined to pursue the highway and the common foot-
path, should not pretend to follow those who take their course
over field and flood, mountains and valleys. Much less should
we venture to judge lightly the fervour, earnestness, zeal and
courage of great characters*."
The Bernese council also addressed an epistle, of a very pacific
character, to the Genevese; but it contained the explanation
which led to so much bitterness when, at a subsequent period,
the Genevese were influenced by such different feelings. The
warning now given was well meant. It was feared that the
business might turn out ill for Bolsec; this was possible ac-
cording to the ideas then prevailing. Calvin however defended
himself against the suspicion thus entertained, as against some-
thing which could have no proper foundation. But the Gene-
vese council found it necessary to pronounce sentence of banish-
ment upon Bolsec, December 23, 1551, because he had obstinately
resisted the judgement of the church, to which he had promised
to submit.
Bolsec returned to Thononfj where he began again to dogma-
tise. He was then silent for a time : he soon however recom-
menced the strife, and was at last banished as an insufferable
disputant, even by the Bernese, who would fain have kept him
quiet. The worst part of his character now showed itself: he pro-
ceeded to Paris, and spoke of repentance, in the hope of obtaining
a position as a reformed pastor. A conference with the ministers
was allowed him. They represented to him his errors and wicked
course, and referred his case to the synod, which was to meet at
Orleans, that he might there solemnly renounce his errors. He
appeared, exhibited the signs of deep contrition, promised to
subscribe the orthodox confession, and to give satisfaction to the
churches of Bern and Geneva. But when he saw the reformed
church in more danger than ever of a fearful persecution, he fell
back into his old state of wretched doubt, and sank deeper and
deeper. He again sought Switzerland. We find him some time
* Hess, Leben Bullingers, T. II. s. 56. This author appears to have no idea
of Calvin's higher calling : he accuses him of seeking honour in the present
controversy.
t Ruchat, Nouv. Ed. t. v. p. 466, t. vi. p. 475.
A.D. 1551.] STRIFE AND CONTROVERSY. 137
after in Lausanne, practising as a physician. He was admitted
to the rights of a citizen, under the condition that he should adopt
the Bernese confession of faith. But he did not remain long there.
Beza wrote against him to the faithful of Lausanne. He was
once more received by the Bernese, but Haller being full of zeal
for purity of doctrine, he was told to remove. His next place of
abode was Mompelgard : he there found Tossanus, who was
opposed to Calvin, and in the end rejoined the catholics. Such
was the hatred of this man against the reformer, that twelve
years after the death of the latter he wrote a libel upon him, which
has been the source of all the detestable slanders current in later
times.
The Bolsec controversy had caused considerable uneasiness at
Geneva, and the ministers feared that the differences of opinion
on this abstract doctrine might give rise to new agitation. It was
the season for the administration of the Lord's Supper, and a
preparatory congregation was held on the 18th of December.
Calvin explained the whole matter, and the collective body of
ministers, both of the city and country, declared that they were
fully agreed with him on the subject. A large number of the
congregation subscribed their names to this statement after the
clergy. The instrument thus signed was printed, and Calvin
compiled and published a work, which he dedicated to the coun-
cil, January 1, 1552, as a new-year's gift. The progress and ter-
mination of this affair proves what influence Calvin had gained,
how united the council was become, and what power the con-
victions which were the result of his labours exercised. To
establish unity, Calvin meditated the renewal and enlargement
of the ( Zurich Consensus.' This was effected at a later period.
The importance which he attached to this formulary appears
from his communications to Farel.
Calvin's incredible zeal in the midst of all these disputes was
to most people a riddle : his enemies raved on all sides. " It
is almost impossible," said Beza, " to describe the agitation in
and out of the city : it is as if the devil himself were sounding
the trumpet. Calvin, they say, makes God the author of sin."
In Basel, Castellio, and in Neuchatel, Christopher Fabri,
though a friend of Calvin, declared his discontent. Melan-
cthon's views are well known : notwithstanding the manner in
which Calvin had expressed himself in his work against Pighius,
Melancthon conceived thai the Genevese entertained the ancient
doctrine of fate, or destiny. The papists clamoured loudly
133 CALVIN AND TROILLET. [CHAP. III.
against the reformers in this respect; and even in Geneva itself
Calvin had to contend with an eremite from Burgundy, who had
passed over to the evangelical church.
The name of the man to whom we here refer was Troillet, an
advocate, and a leader of the malcontents, and who, like Bolsec,
a weak man, was ignorant of the real purport of the theological
question, and, still more, of the necessity of union and of the
force of Calvin's mind. By birth a Genevese, he no sooner found
himself weary of an ascetic life than he desired to return
Geneva as a minister. This was against the law. Calvin, who
fully understood his pretensions to piety, and saw through his
hypocrisy, repelled his advances. The council however directed
the consistory to admit Troillet to the situation left vacant by a
deceased minister. But Calvin had sufficient influence with the
council to procure the reversal of this decree : he even proved
that two members of the body had received presents from
Troillet : this created great disgust. Troillet gave up his preten-
sions to the ministerial office, but passed over to the opposite
party. He was at this time a member of the chief council. In
the hotel where the Libertines held their meetings he declaimed
against Calvin, as guilty of the grossest pride, and as contra-
dicting his own opinions, as exhibited in the ' Institutions/
Calvin cited him before the council. Troillet defended himself,
and endeavoured to prove that Calvin made God the author of
sin. On the first of September, an order was passed prohibiting
the reformer from preaching on the doctrine of predestination.
Agitation and disorder universally prevailed. The council in-
vited Farel and Viret to Geneva, to undertake the restoration of
tranquillity. The discussion between Calvin and Troillet was
concluded on the ninth of November, and the book of the i In-
stitutions' was recognized by the Genevese as " good and Chris-
tian," and Calvin as " a true minister of the Word of God." It
was forbidden to speak against Calvin's work ; but six days after,
his opponent received an apology from the council*.
Calvin gave an account of this controversy to a friend. " It
grieves me chiefly that Troillet found the means of dragging
Philip with him into the quarrel. I shrunk from this, for I could
safely declare that I had always spoken of that great man with
sentiments of honour." He expresses a suspicion that Falais had
sent Troillet from his wretched abode. Of himself he says, that
* MS. Gen. Vol. contcn. Memoires sur Caroli et Troillet.
A.D. 1552.] CALVIN AND HIS FRIENDS. 139
it was difficult for him to exercise moderation under such circum-
But how encouraging was it for Calvin that his writings were
spoken of as pious and orthodox, even by the opposite party !
It happened after some years that he was called to visit a sick
man : he hastened to see him : Troillet lay on his death-bed :
disquietude and deep repentance moved his soul : he declared
that he could not feel peace unless he was assured, before his
end, that Calvin was reconciled to him. With his peculiar ear-
nestness and tenderness, Calvin consoled the dying man, and
supported him to the last moment*. Thus the power of his
doctrine triumphed, however and on whatever side opposed.
Still Calvin could not easily bear the coldness and indifference
of his friends. He appealed to Bullinger with mingled severity
and pathos. " Bolsec," he said, " has disturbed by his clamours
the peace of the church : he complains that we describe God as
possessed of a tyrannical power, and that we set up a poetical
Jupiter in his place : and yet you defend this man,— a thing to be
most vehemently lamented f."
Not long after he justified himself, in a letter to the same, on
his mode of teaching the doctrine of election. " You say that
my manner offends many excellent persons. But, between our-
selves, Zwingli's little book is filled with so many hard passages,
that it far surpasses my weak comprehension %» This observation
confirms what has been said in a former part of this book re-
specting Calvin's opinion of Zwingli. With regard to Fabri, he
complains of the coldness of the Basel people, and of Myconius
and Sulzer§. To the Bernese he expresses himself still more
strongly : he thus addresses Farel|| : " You might expect them
to renounce altogether the doctrine of election, and the wonder-
ful providence of God/' He hoped to have exhibited a feeling
of tranquillity in his letters, but he had much to do to quiet his
agitation. Fearing that he might not meet with a brotherly
welcome, he would not go to Bern. Such however was the
multitude of evils which prevailed, that it was necessary some-
thing should be done. The Consensus itself was endangered ;
and if the union failed in this point all would be lost. His public
writings were characterized by moderation. He lamented that
* Beza, Vie de Calv. t MS. Gen. Jan. 21, 1552. J MS. Gen.
§ " Expert! sumus quam parum in iis sit auxilii. Myconius fngide nescio
quid attingit, rem nulla modo expendit."
|| MS. Gen. Jan. 27, 1552.
140 JACQUES DE BOURGOGNE. [CHAP. III.
Bolsec had not expressed himself as the Swiss did in their con-
fession. The latter, though not sufficiently clear, were orthodox
in their sentiments*.
But consolation and sympathy were not wanting to him at this
period. Calvin ever found in Farel's friendship a great source
of support. In March 1551 he wrote to himt: "I cannot say
how much I thank you. May Christy who is both my treasure,
and my chief treasure too, repay you ! " At the end of December
in the same year Viret addressed Calvin in these encouraging
words : " The devil persecutes you and Farel, because you defend
the interests of Christ. Do you therefore receive his attacks as
a sacrament, through which you may become more and more
confirmed in the holy struggle to which you are called. Think
of the faith by which David was strengthened, when he was going
against Goliath ; and how he remembered the victory which he
had gained over the bear and the lion. He who has hitherto
rendered you and your brethren invincible, will perfect the work
which he has begun, through you."
During these untoward events, afflicting news arrived from
France, respecting the persecution of the evangelical party in
that country. But Bullinger thus addressed him J : "The God
who delivered his people out of Egypt lives for ever. He lives
who led them back from captivity. He lives, who has given
freedom to his church, emperors, kings and princes lying pro-
strate before him. But we must enter into heaven through much
tribulation. Woe however be to them who harm the apple of
God's eye ! Let us continue to preach the pure word, and to
proclaim the Gospel of Christ, and, with all saints, to fix our
eyes on heaven. Then He who has said e I will be with you to
the end of the world,' will never forsake us."
Calvin stood in the nearest relation to Jacques de Bourgogne,
Sieur de Falais and Bredam. His friendship for this excellent
man shows us how strictly he viewed life itself, with all its asso-
ciations, from the central point of truth and the church. Jacques
de Bourgogne had sought in Geneva that peace which he found
it impossible to obtain in France. Calvin rejoiced to receive
him, and he and his wife resided for some time in the reformer's
house. The latter wrote an apology for him, which was laid
before the emperor ; and he dedicated to him his commentary on
* Ed. Laus. Ep. 134 ; Ed. Amstel. p. 64. b.
f Kirchhofer, in Farel's Lebcn. ; Farel and Calvin, March 1551.
J Ed. Laus. Ep. 139.
A.D. 1552.] BOURGOGNE AND BOLSEC. 141
.the First Epistle to the Corinthians. A reference to the corre-
spondence which they carried on for many years will prove how
tender a regard united Calvin and this noble family. It is re-
markable, however, that great as was the friendship which the
Sieur de Bourgogne entertained for Calvin, he long resisted his
persuasion to settle in Geneva. He at first preferred Basel, and
Calvin described in vain the beauties of Geneva, adding even
that he had bought on his account a cask of old wine. It seems
indeed as if the lord of Falais suspected that it was easier to
honour a great man at a certain distance than when too near.
He was of a somewhat gay temper, and the tone of society at
Basel, where the elegant Erasmus had formerly, and where the
liberal Castellio now, lived, was not so stern as at Geneva.
The ministers of that place were also of a quieter temper, and
they saw clearly that it was not every one who could imitate
Calvin's eagle flight. At length however Bourgogne yielded,
and proceeded to Geneva, where Bolsec became his physician.
Now begins the catastrophe. The good Falais and his excellent
wife had no suspicion of what was going on, and they under-
stood nothing of the controversy respecting predestination. They
could not comprehend the mystery of eternal decrees, and they
beheld with astonishment their intimate friend rousing himself
like a lion robbed of its young, — his benevolent countenance
full of fire, his forehead expressive of the sternest indig-
nation, and the accomplished Calvin raging against all the
world. The peace-loving Bourgogne had formerly entreated
Bullinger to unite with Calvin in restoring peace to the church ;
" for two such spirits as yours," he said, " could not easily be
found, to perform this work of reconciling that which other pious
people may have disturbed." Now he said to Bullinger, with a
sorrowful heart, u It is not without tears that I am compelled
to see and hear this tragedy of Calvin and his friends. May
God ever vouchsafe to grant us the truth ! " Bourgogne adopted
from benevolence the part of his imprisoned physician; and
when the latter was banished, he left for ever the city where a
feeling prevailed so contrary to his taste, and where it was con-
sidered a violation of propriety to speak of the freedom of the
will. He used his influence with the Swiss to protect Bolsec,
and he subsequently declared that he agreed with him in his
views. Hence Calvin's anger. " Let Falais, if he please, regard
Bolsec as a good man ; and whilst he defends an unknown bab-
bler, expose his own calling to hazard. But this is the end of
142 BOURGOGNE AND BOLSEC. [CHAP. III.
the matter. That deceiver shall not be received in the Bernese
territory. I am so ashamed when I think of Falais, that I can
scarcely bear to see the face of any one who reminds me of his
levity*/'
It is difficult for us now to understand how so excellent a man
as Bourgogne could become the friend of so unworthy a one
as Bolsec. But the latter was to him as the protector of his
earthly existence. Calvin has let fall some few words on this
subject: he even retracted the honour which had bestowed
upon his friend a kind of immortality — the dedication, that is,
to the Commentary, mentioned above ; as a king might take
from an unfaithful servant the decorations granted him at a
former period. In the year 1556 he dedicated this work, as we
have also stated, to the excellent Galeazzo Caraccioli, whose life
appeared to him in complete contrast to that of Bolsec. " Would
to God," he said, " that when this my commentary first saw the
light, he had been unknown to me, whose name I am now com-
pelled to obliterate, or at least that I had known his true character 1"
The friendship between Calvin and Bullinger was not for a
moment weakened through this controversy with Bolsec. He
remained equally united with Haller and Musculus. Bullinger
warned him affectionately to be cautious on the doctrine of pre-
destination, when he published the second defence against West-
phal, and Calvin did not reject his counsel.
At length, that is at the beginning of the year 1552, Calvin
was informed that a courier from Saxony, passing hastily through
Geneva, was anxious to see him. This was the son of Justus
Jonas, from Wittenberg, sent by the counts of Mansfeld to the
king of France. Calvin anxiously asked him the state of the
church in Saxonyf. "The wrath of God," he exclaimed after
this conversation, u is turning the world upside down, because
it refuses to rest under his dominion. I dare not say more in a
letter. As our conversation referred to the Saxon church, the
stranger told me, among other things, that Melancthon was
publicly censured, because he had not openly stated his agree-
ment with us on the subject of the Lord's Supper. He himself
spoke so prudently, and with so much knowledge of the whole
matter, that I could discover nothing whatever injudicious in his
conversation, though I took pains to observe him with the
greatest attention."
* MS. Gen. Dec. 1551.
t From the year 1552. Ed. Laus. Ep. 140. Ed. Amstel. p. 67.
A.D. 1552.] GENEVA AND BERN. 143
Melancthon however was now somewhat perplexed : he had
viewed the doctrine of predestination with considerable uneasi-
ness, and could not follow the lofty progress of Calvin's ideas.
We learn this from his letter to Camerarius*, in which he ex-
claims, " See the madness of the age ! the Allobrogian (the
Genevese) controversy on the stoical doctrine of Fate, rages to
such a degree, that people are cast into prison if they do not hold
the same views on the subject as Zeno." Socinus had written
to him, and Calvin replied to him in these noble words : " No-
thing shall hinder me from stating openly what I have learnt
from the holy Scriptures. The reception of this simple doc-
trine is, and will ever continue to be, to me, the only rule of wis-
dom."
The long-existing quarrel between Geneva and Bern had ar-
rived during this controversy at its greatest height. Many
historians have well described the internal state of Switzerland
at this timet- That however which chiefly concerns the pur-
poses of our biography is the inward, divine impulse which
governed Calvin, and convinced him that he must gain the vic-
tory for his doctrine. He stood alone against all. We may
rightly compare him with the great pontiffs of the middle ages,
who, whilst they were often oppressed and insulted by the infe-
rior nobility at Rome, swayed at a distance the destiny of rulers,
made nations tremble, and solved the most important of histo-
rical problems. This remark will tend to explain how Calvin
continued exposed year after year to numberless petty annoy-
ances and persecutions, whilst his influence was so powerfully
felt in all directions. It has been said, that the Bernese pro-
hibited all discussion and preaching on the subject of predesti-
nation in their territory. There were however many whose
zeal prompted them still to rave against Calvin and Geneva. It
was a distressing period for him. He now wrote the Defence of
the Consensus. Agitation prevailed in the city J, and in Bern
the people were excited to the most bitter feeling of hostility.
This arose indeed to such a height that they openly insulted
Calvin, and loaded the Genevese with curses from the pulpit.
" It is reported throughout the country that we have been con-
* Corpus Reform. Ed. Br. T. vii. p. 390. Cal. Feb. 1552.
f See Trechsel's Antitrinitarier, s. 194 ; Hess, Leben Bullingers, t. ii. s. 237 ;
and especially Hundeshagen, Conflicte des Zwinglianismus, Lutheranismus
und Calvinismus in der Berner Kircbe, s. 253.
I MS. Gen. Calvinus Bullingero, Sept. 18, 1554. His language is very
strong : — " Interim a vicinis nostris plus quam atrociter proscindor ."
144 GENEVA AND BERN. [CHAP. III.
demned by the Bernese ministers as heretics." This sentence
occurs in the epistle of the Genevese to the Bernese ministers,
October 6th, 1554; and further, " Zebedaeus, babbling on the
subject of foreknowledge, exclaimed aloud at a dinner-table, that
we are worse than papists. Encouraged by these things, that
monster (Bolsec) who lives at Thonon, cries that Calvin is a he-
retic and an antichrist. On the opposite side of the lake dwells
another, not very unlike the former : his name is Sebastian, a
banished Genevese. Think now what sport is created for the
papists by these occurrences, and what scandal is thereby heaped
upon the holy name of Christ." The Genevese demanded satis-
faction ; but Haller and Musculus had not the courage to lay
their letter before the council.
The Bernese again prohibited the discussion of this mysterious
doctrine, and still more expressly the subject of discipline, as
connected with excommunication.
At the repeated instance however of the Genevese, Bolsec
and the more violent of the preachers were brought before the
council at Bern. It exhibited great firmness, and desired nothing
but peace. The popular dislike to Geneva was only the more
remarkable. On this occasion the conduct of the Bernese minis-
ters in general was highly becoming : they warned their supe-
riors with great faithfulness ; but none appeared to understand
the ground of Calvin's zeal. They answered the Genevese
council with implied reproaches, and exhorted all to cultivate
peace. A mandate was issued from Bern, in which people were
strictly forbidden to go to Geneva, or to receive the sacrament
according to the Calvinistic form. This mandate, read by the
preachers from the pulpit, and posted up by the order of the
magistrates, was unfortunately regarded by the people as an
excommunication of the Genevese, and Calvin's name was loaded
with execrations. He poured out his griefs to Bullinger*:
" Having attained some degree of tranquillity here in Geneva,
the Bernese council has not only absolved those who denounce
me as a heretic, but they have sent forth against me and this
church a host of raging adversaries. We are accused as crimi-
nals, and we have shown that we are ready at any moment to
give an account of ourselves. With our own free consent we
have allowed them to be our judges ; but they will not hear us.
In the meantime the people are forbidden, by a public edict, to
* MS. Tig. Feb. 24, 1555.
A.D. 1552.] GENEVA AND BERN. 145
partake of the sacrament with us. Cease then to feel any asto-
nishment at the barbarity of the Saxons ; since hatred against a
man, who has a hundred times been ready to peril his neck for
the sake of peace, can thus be made a cause for rending the
churches asunder. Nothing disturbs me more than the feeling
that God is hereby manifesting his wrath. But if so it must be,
let them satisfy their hunger by driving me into a wearisome
exile. I pour out these complaints into your bosom, that you
may support me by your holy prayers."
All this tended to the entire destruction of union among the
churches of Switzerland. A deputation therefore was sent from
Geneva. It consisted of a syndic, a member of the council,
Calvin, and another minister, and proceeded to its task in March
1555. Viret in the meantime came from Lausanne, and Fabri
from Neuchatel, with two others, to make their complaints on
the subject in dispute. Geneva had placed in the hands of its
representatives an " Instruction," written by Calvin himself,
and containing a firm statement of evangelical faith*. It was
required that an inquiry should be instituted into the slanders
against Calvin's doctrine, and into those against the Genevese
themselves, who were accused of despitefully rejecting the Bernese
rites and ceremonies. The firmness of the Genevese in this
respect is well-deserving of notice, considering their position
in respect to Bern, their political difficulties, their anxious desire
to renew their treaty with the Bernese, which the present move-
ment was so ill calculated to promote, and the perils with which
their little state was threatened on the side of France and Savoy.
The energy of Calvin's faith was their ruling principle through
this whole period.
Calvin now stood before the council at Bernf? and stated his
complaints. The examination was deferred to a later day, to
enable the opposite party to appear. The deputies accordingly
repeated their statements, April 2, 1555. Calvin addressed the
assembly with his usual eloquence, in a speech of which the
following is an abstract: — "No other doctrine is preached at
Geneva than that which is preached at Bern ; the doctrine, that
is, of predestination ; and, therefore, we pray you to take means
to instruct your subjects thereon, and thereby silence the slanders
with which we are assailed. We also beg that these calumnies
* MS.
t Compare He?s, Leben Bullingers, t. ii. ?. 246, and the complete account
in Trechsel, s. 200. Ruchat, t. vi. p. 127.
VOL. II. L
146 GENEVA AND BERN. [CHAP. III.
may not go unpunished ; and that the mandate by which your
people are forbidden to partake of the sacrament at Geneva
may be otherwise and better worded, seeing that some ill-disposed
persons have taken occasion therefrom to assert that you con-
demn our doctrine."
But the opposition to Calvin was universal ; and his adversaries
either denied what they had said, or escaped by subterfuge. The
Genevese, however, would not be satisfied by such excuses.
Calvin boldly brought forth his great doctrine, that to which he
had devoted his life, and declared "that he was not contending
for himself, but for the truth, and that a synod therefore must
decide the question." He would have gone again before the
council, but his friends prevented him. Haller, who now seemed
to begin to understand him, took a lively interest in his cause.
Calvin spoke again the next day ; but his ardent zeal only occa-
sioned offence. The preacher L'Ange quoted a passage from his
works, said to be heretical. Calvin had somewhere written, that
" Christ was despairing on the cross." Calvin in reply declared,
Si that this was an error of the press." But the council was of
opinion that he was answerable for it, and remained inflexible.
With a rude angry tone the Bernese admonished the Genevese to
preserve peace, and to see that their ministers preached so as to
offend no one, nor even in their books to investigate the deep
secrets of God, which was not necessary, nor likely to conduce
to edification. As for Calvin^s doctrine, they would not inquire
into it, nor pronounce either for or against it. There should be
no controversy on the subject in their territory. They added,
that they were aware that Calvin rejected the doctrine of Zwingli
on the Sacrament as false and dangerous ; and that he directed
this censure against themselves, to whom the doctrine pertained
as a part of their reformation. They had therefore just cause of
offence against him ; but they would now pass this over, in order
to give him an example of moderation. They notwithstanding
warned him, that if they should hereafter find in their territory
books, or other writings of his, directed against the doctrine of
their church, they would order them to be burnt; and would
severely punish any one who should in any wise write or speak
against their reformation.
This was the unity after which Calvin panted ! The man who
could write to a- Lasco : — " Fain would I that all the churches of
Christ were so united, that the angels might look down from
heaven, and add to our glory with their harmony." The waves
A. D. 1552.] GENEVA AND BERN. 147
which cast him on the strand bore him back. He returned to
Geneva with his mighty convictions in his heart, which no
one would share with him, but which he was assured would
finally conquer. The deputies protested, with all their force,
against the resolution of the Bernese. Those of Lausanne and
others also remonstrated against them. " Zwingli and CEcolam-
padius," they said, Ck would have agreed with Calvin in this
matter: quiet would soon be restored if people would but be
guided by Scripture." The council however would yield no-
thing, and Calvin on his side remained if possible still more im-
moveable. But Bolsec, as a disturber of the public tranquillity,
with two others who had affronted the honour of Geneva, were
expelled the Bernese territory. The friends of Calvin also now
stepped forward, offering their sympathy and encouragements.
Farel said to him : — " I must be made of wood and stone, if I
do not regard you with the tenderest affection. Christ has
worked for us above all our hope, and will accomplish still
greater things. Surely we ought to stand unterrined ; for the
conflict is not ours, nor are we the leaders."
Calvin, as a truly great man, was wholly occupied with the
desire of working out his general historic principle. It is easy
to perceive what was the spirit which operated on his mind in
the remonstrance against the Bernese decree1'. " As great hatred
had been exhibited against him there," he said, " he wished to
appear in Bern as a private person. But it was not he alone
who had been condemned: the whole church of Geneva and
the Bernese ministers, who agreed with him, were included in the
sentence of the late decree." " You think that no books ought
to be written on the mysteries of God : but to what does this
tend? Many in your territory speak more insultingly of the
holy doctrine of predestination than would be suffered even in
popish countries. I know well enough that we ought to be
humble and modest in the treatment of this profound, incompre-
hensible mystery ; but if you had looked into my much-misre-
presented book, your excellencies would have discovered that its
only object is to subdue the pride of the human spirit, and to
teach it to reverence in all fear and humility the majesty of God,
without in any wise giving the reins to an idle curiosity. But
if people will indiscreetly abuse this doctrine, and attempt to
correct the Holy Spirit, we must strike out of the Scriptures
what is openly revealed to us in their pages. I cannot but
* MS. Gen. et Bern., May 4, 1 Jr.").
) 2
148 CALVIN AND BEZA. [CHAP. III.
wonder that I alone am attacked; for if what I have said be
compared with what has been set forth by the most learned men
in Germany, who have seen the light of the Gospel in these our
days, it will be found that my language is far more cautious than
theirs. I therefore adjure you, according to the precept of our
Lord Jesus Christ, that you show no respect for persons ; since
though my name and books should perish, what the prophets
and apostles have said would endure for ever; and it is from
them that I have derived the doctrine which man condemns."
At the end of May, Calvin was again sent to Bern, in order if
possible to establish some better ground of agreement*. But
this experiment led to no useful result. Political rivalries di-
vided the two states, and the libertine party, which had been
dispersed, now found a shelter in Bern. But if the enmity against
Calvin increased, his sense of duty became still greaterf- We
learn this from his own expressions. Addressing the Bernese
ministers with profound earnestness, he prayed for counsel, pro-
tection, and sympathy J. " Shall I not," he says, " defend a doc-
trine by my words, for which the holy martyrs doubted not a
moment to pour out their blood?" "That they who speak of
God's election shall be punished, — consider wTell whether this
ought to be endured. I would rather that my tongue should be
cut out, than that such an enormity should be allowed in a
church entrusted to my care and fidelity."
It was a circumstance favourable to the cause, that the council
of Bern did not declare in his favour. Had it done so, it would
no doubt have been believed that Calvin had effected by his in-
fluence what was afterwards accomplished by the mere force of
truth. All the slanders which had been uttered then vanished
as smoke. After Calvin's death, his accuser, Andreas Zebedaeus,
the man who persecuted him so virulently, confessed, on his
death-bed at Nyon, in the presence of many witnesses, the truth
of the doctrine which he had assailed ; and in order to testify
his repentance, desired that all the papers referring to the con-
troversy should be burnt before his eyes. This was more im-
portant for the cause of the reformer than all the decisions at
Bern §.
The world deals in contraries : Calvin was called to raise one
side of this doctrine, that the other might sink into shade. This
was not understood till the conscience of his dying opponents
* Bretschn. Epp. Calv. p. 60. f MS. Gen. Calv. Bullingero Jun. 5, 1555.
t MS. Gen. 3 Non. Mai. 1555. § Beza, Vie de Calv.
A.D. 1552.] CALVIN AND BEZA. 149
admonished them, that it was the Holy Spirit alone who im-
pelled Calvin to the course which he had- adopted. The true
historian will take due notice of this important fact.
Beza, Calvin's energetic friend, and who seemed to have one
heart and one soul with him, could not remain silent under the
circumstances above described : Calvin's belief was his. With
the convictions derived therefrom were intimately combined
whatever was most excellent in his character, or most useful in
his labours. Calvin willingly allowed him the first place in the
eyes of the world. In this, the third epoch of the reformer's life,
they both pursued the same end ; and Beza was thoroughly im-
pressed with the idea, that the evangelical church could only be
delivered by the establishment of unity. Hence, in the contro-
versy with Bolsec, he espoused with the utmost zeal the party
of Calvin ; and undertook to quiet the minds of the Swiss, and
to suppress the agitation which existed, by setting the doctrine
of his friend in a fair and correct point of view. With this ob-
ject he lectured at Lausanne, in French, on the Epistle to the
Romans. He had already acquired fame by his poem on u Abra-
ham Sacrificing," and was altogether fitted for the office which
he undertook*.
But on the other hand, he openly expressed his opinions:
"Calvin knows well enough from Bullinger's letter, that people
are not pleased with his old treatment of the doctrine of predes-
tination. He ought for the sake of the weak to have spoken with
less severity and distinctness." And further : " As Pighius is
dead, he had no reason to employ abuse as if he were still alive,
for he thereby offended many." Though a confutation of Pighius,
his work was not, he observed, a confutation of all opponents.
Beza, therefore, suggested to him a plan, according to which
the whole would appear much simpler. He could not however
write for him to Bern, because it was well known there that he
and Viret were on intimate terms with him. Still he was an
active and zealous labourer in Calvin's cause. When the mi-
nisters in the Lausanne district were most violently excited
against the doctrine of reprobation, Beza induced them to hold
an assembly, in which they subscribed a formulary, declaring
that God has elected to happiness a number of human beings
from eternity ; not on account of their faith, but to bring them
to faith. But the word f reprobation ' was not introduced ; and
Beza declared to his friend, "that he had acted as a prudent
* Compare Schlosser's Life of Beza, here chiefly referred to.
150 CALVIN AND BEZA. [CHAP. III.
creditor with an honourable debtor, accepting what was offered
him at the time, and looking for the rest at a future and more
prosperous period." Beza also undertook the difficult task of
reconciling the Swiss ; and he prayed Calvin to induce Bullinger
and Blaarer especially to write to the Bernese council. They
in vain sought to move Melancthon to declare himself. He
seemed not to understand Calvin's zeal or love*. But how
truly was Beza Calvin's friend ! How well did he understand
his position ! Speaking of him to Bullinger, in terms of the
tenderest eulogy, he says : — " I testify before God, that Calvin
has not been too earnest in this affair. I admire, on the con-
trary^ his patience and moderation in contending with so many
bad spirits f." This witness as given by Beza, who saw Calvin's
labours, is worth much to those who would form a fair judgement
of the man.
The Zurichers compelled Bolsec, as we have seen, to keep for
a time silent. When however he had found a protector in the
lord of Falais, Beza sought in several journeys, which he made
on foot, to obtain for Calvin the aid of many influential men
against Bolsec. So full of zeal was he in this respect, that he
brought upon himself the charge of neglecting the proper duties
of his office X, for the sake of labouring to promote unity. This
was a cause of great offence to the Bernese.
We have seen that Bolsec again appealed to the council at
Bern against Calvin ; and that the latter poured out his feelings
in a second epistle, addressed to the Bernese ministers, in 1555.
The image of his character is deeply impressed upon this writing.
Inspired by holy zeal, he displayed his doctrine to the hearts of
his opponents as a thing of God. But what he was unable to
accomplish by the stormy power of his convictions, Beza effected
by the devotion of his friendship. He sought witnesses against
Bolsec in order to compel him to an answer. The Bernese
could now no longer protect him. By means therefore of Beza,
who makes no mention whatever of the circumstance in his Life
of Calvin, the latter overcame his most dangerous adversary.
Hence also we see the influence of the reformer. Hated though
he was, he found friends sufficiently enthusiastic in his cause to
expose themselves for his sake to a host of the bitterest ene-
mies. Great as were the trouble and annoyance which Beza
* Beza says (MS. Goth.), " Philip has disappointed my hopes." "O miserum
hominem ! Hi sunt nimirum fructus eorum, qui non a Deo, sed a coelo pendent."
t MS. Goth. J Schlosser, Lcben Bezas, s. 43, 62.
A.D. 1552.] CALVIN AND BEZA. 151
encountered throughout the proceedings, he exhibited a resolu-
tion and self-denial characteristic of the noblest mind. He un-
dertook and endured all in the power of faith, and feared not
the banishment, with which he was threatened, from the Bernese
territory : " If the earth itself rejected him," he said, " still
heaven was open*." And the sacrifice which he made for Calvin
must be regarded as of yet higher value, when it is recollected,
that he was at this very period occupied with his annotations on
the edition of the Testament published by Henry Stephens.
Beza and Viret protested violently against the Bernese edict,
issued in 1555, and which forbad in severe terms any participa-
tion in the controversy on the side of the ministers. After many
arguments, Beza saysfj "As far as we are concerned, let it not
be supposed that we would impose anything upon ourselves
with regard to our faith as Christians, through reverence for
Calvin, or any other human being. We confess, however, that
having become acquainted with his teaching, with his work on
Predestination, and his various expositions of Scripture, we ac-
knowledge, according to our consciences, that his doctrine is
agreeable to the Bible." Bolsec was hereupon banished; but
the threatened penalties were still inflicted. Beza issued, in 1557?
another writing respecting the repeal of the offensive edict, and
the Bernese now began seriously to consider the matter. He
and Viret, however, at length left the territory. They declared
that, though their fellow-labourers yielded their assent, they could
not in their conscience adopt the resolutions of the Bernese.
Beza's work against Castellio concludes with the wish, that the
authorities of Basel would expel the latter from their land. We
shall consider Castellio's reply, after we have reviewed Calvin's
" Consensus Pastorum."
He dedicated this work, in the name of the assembled ministers,
to the council of Geneva, as a new-year's gift, January 1, 1552.
In his address he thanks the members of this body for their
untiring defence of pure doctrine ; exhorts them to persevere,
and to protect all who sought safety in their city, that it might
thereby become, in those troubled times, a secure sanctuary, a
city of refuge, for the dispersed members of Christ. Bolsec
himself is not mentioned, and this because he seemed to have
merely wished to gain a name by burning the temple of God.
The work is therefore directed against Pighius and Georg. Siculus
* MS. Goth. " Si nos terra non ceperit, at ccrte ccelum nobis patet."
Schlosscr, s. 63. t Schlosser, s. CO, from Beza's Tractat. Thcol.
152 CALVIN ON PREDESTINATION. [CHAP. III.
only, it being Calvin's object to treat Bolsec with marked
contempt.
Milton, in his description of the world below, shows us the
wicked spirits, disputing on the subject of freedom and necessity ;
on fate and providence ; on good and evil ; happiness and eternal
woe. This was founded on a deep consideration of the human
mind, which is too weak to solve the great problem in which
such questions are involved, and the discussion of which is
described as proper to the damned. The subject indeed is one
which cannot but confound the understanding and arouse the
fiercest passions, whenever it is treated of without humility, faith
and devotion. If grace alone produces all our actions, it is not
man who acts, but the eternal law, and many men are of neces-
sity led to salvation, and others to destruction. If, on the other
hand, man be left free, he is responsible for his sins, but cannot
comprehend why God should have given him a free-will which
urges him to eternal ruin. Freedom brings with itself the terri-
ble alternative of eternal life and eternal death. But why was
this possibility of sin allowed, when God must have foreseen the
consequences ? Now if two disputants, both equally convinced
of the truth of their views, and inspired with like zeal, stand
resolved to force, each upon the other, his own particular notion ;
they are like those spirits which, as described by Milton, rest
solely upon intelligence, and neglect the aid of humble prayer to
guide them in their inquiry.
It was not thus with Calvin : prayer and the grace of the
Spirit were his support. His work shows that if free-will be in-
comprehensible, yet the grandeur of the attempt to grasp it is
not to be despised ; and that we may easily be tempted in our per-
plexity to look into the great mystery of God's own being. There
is at least something striking in the view, which says that all is
good before God, — the world with its errors and its crimes ; that
all sins have happened in agreement with his will, because He
turns them to the best purposes ; and that there is no evil but
in the man, — in the individual. The writer however who could
venture to exhibit this daring theory in its boldest form, cherished
the profoundest trust in the God in whom he believed. The
ground of the whole argument is as follows : — God, before the
creation of the world, freely elected a certain number of men,
and consigned another portion to eternal reprobation ; we being-
altogether incapable of knowing or understanding why He did
so. Predestination embraces three chief points : — 1. The eternal
A.D. 1552.] CALVIN ON PROVIDENCE. 153
decree, through which God determined, before the sin of Adam,
what should take place with regard to the whole human race,
and to each individual ; 2. The principle, that man is condemned
to death on account of his own sin and wickedness ; and 3. That
after Adam fell, the entire human stock was so corrupted and
debased in him, that God could not consider one better than
another; and that, therefore, those whom He saves, He saves
only through his own free grace.
The whole development of this doctrine is, as Calvin himself
says, a repetition of that which is found in the Institutions. He
proves his theory by Augustin and the Scriptures, referring
chiefly to the apostle Paul. Whenever he finds himself com-
pelled to acknowledge the difficulties of his system, he plainly
declares that he could not comprehend so great a mystery ; and
that we ought to be content to receive that which God has been
pleased to reveal to us, and to teach in his Holy Word. The in-
tensely sublime idea of the Godhead, which penetrated Calvin's
soul, impelled his understanding to place all upon that one
point, and thus to bow unceasingly before the solemn thought
of God. The tract on Providence, appended to the work, is
useful and edifying. Calvin speaks, first, of the general pro-
vidence which upholds the world at large ; secondly, of the par-
ticular providence by which God watches over every individual
creature ; thirdly, he shows the care of God for kingdoms ; and
lastly, the watchfulness and fatherly goodness which He exercises
on behalf of his church.
In the next place, he answers the common objections to the
doctrine, and shows that God, whose will governs all, cannot be
the author of sin. He does not agree with Augustin in the
notion, that sin in itself is merely corruption ; but he insists upon
the principle, that all wicked actions, and whatever is done by
men with a wicked design, are, notwithstanding, good and righte-
ous works of God. " Nothing happens by chance, nothing by
necessity. For us there may be contingences, but not for God,
who has determined all things beforehand by his own counsel.
For example, the bones of Christ might have been broken upon
the cross, but not one was broken, because it was so determined
by God. Providence works by second causes. We cannot say,
'All is determined, and therefore it is indifferent what we do;
for God has commanded us to act thus, and no otherwise/ But
the Lord rules over the free-will of men : He it is who excites
good in their hearts. He also hardens the heart, and yet the
154 CALVIN ON PROVIDENCE. [CHAP. III.
sin which is committed in its hardness comes from man alone.
To will and to do is the result of his working ; and He bows
the human heart to his will. We accordingly cannot say that
God merely allows sin : it happens actually by his will. The
wicked deeds which are done certainly do not please God, but
He has them in his power, and He makes them issue in good.
Augustin says, that the will of God is the necessity of things."
Calvin interprets this proposition as signifying that, whatever
happens, happens by God's almighty will; not simply in nature,
through existing laws, but through his hidden counsel and his
grace. This omnipotent God, however, always acts according
to law and righteousness. It would be easier to deprive the
sun of its warmth than God of his righteousness ; and he doubt-
less sins not in the act which he recognises as sin in the offender.
Robbers took away the goods of Job ; but he says, " The Lord
gave, and the Lord hath taken away;" but assuredly he imputes
not to God the crime committed by the robbers. We must
judge of everything according to the design and object of him
who does it. For example, the judge who condemns a murderer
to death, and causes his blood to be shed, deserves praise. And
should not God be viewed in the same light ? So also a king is
commended, who, with the good design of upholding his country,
leads an army to battle. While he does this, individuals com-
mit many evil deeds, robbery and murder, but these things
are never laid to the charge of the monarch. He is not accounted
guilty of blood-shedding. How then should God be unjust,
and why should the glory of his righteousness be darkened be-
cause He acts by wicked angels and by men ? The sun is ever
shining in its splendour, though sometimes hidden from us by
the black vapours of the earth. And thus it is with the righte-
ousness of God. It is the wish of blasphemers only to involve
all in the like condemnation, because the human and the divine
will appear in collision.
" But though men's wicked actions come from God, and not
without good cause, although this be not known to us, and
though his will is the first source of all things, yet I (Calvin)
say that God is not the cause of sin. Men act, impelled by the
force of passion ; but God who acts through them, by means of
his righteous judgement, which is wholly incomprehensible to us,
cannot sin. What is it which works sin in man, but a wicked
disposition, cruelty, pride, envy, evil desires? But there is
nothing of all this in God. It was thus that Shimei sinned
A.D. 1552.] CALVIN AND CASTELLIO. 155
against David ; but David knew that it was the will of God, and
that his will is just. So also did the wickedness of the Arabians
who robbed Job appear sufficiently evident, for they were
wrought upon by sinful desires, but God made use of them in a
righteous way to prove the patience of Job. It often seems as
if man and God agreed in will ; but they do not any more than
fire and water ; for while the one desires the absolute good, the
other desires the absolute wrong. Let us ever return to Au-
gustin, who says, < The works of God are precious, according to
his will, but they are often incomprehensible to us. So that
that which happens against his will, happens not without his
will. For nothing would take place did not he allow it; and
he does not allow it against his will, but according to and with
his will.' "
Calvin was well-aware that the banishment of Bolsec would
not terminate the struggle. Though little satisfied with their
conduct, he had addressed a friendly letter to the ministers of
Basel, and proved to them how far removed Bolsec was from
their opinions, and how little right he had to expect their sup-
port. He foresaw evils to come. There was one great doctrine
for which he had to struggle to the end of his life. In Geneva,
the libertine party hoped that Calvin would be driven out of the
city through these occurrences. The opposition was as fierce in
Basel as in Bern. There, where Erasmus so long laboured, a
freer opposition against the doctrine of Luther was encouraged ;
and there less severity was exhibited against the heresy of Ser-
vetus. Hence we may understand why the free-thinking people
of Basel so readily received the learned Castellio, who stood in
direct opposition to Calvin. Castellio, with no remarkable theo-
logical acuteness, rather inclined to natural religion. He openly
taught his Pelagian doctrines : nor did he possess the capacity
to comprehend the profound ideas of the thinking and devout
Calvin, and still less the character of his times. According to
the writing which appeared under the name of Martin Bellius,
abusive anonymous papers were addressed to the Geneva council,
against the doctrine of the reformer (155 1). Calvin recognized
his opponent at Basel in them, and complained to Sulzer. Cas-
tellio was accused before the council at Basel ; but he denied
having any share in the matter. Another later pamphlet, which
must also be mentioned as referring to this period, contained an
extract from Calvin's exposition of the doctrine of predestination.
It was sent by the Swiss to Paris, in order to be printed. A copy
156 CALVIN AND CASTELLIO. [CHAP. III.
came into Beza's hands, and he forwarded it to Calvin. Both
wrote answers to these tracts. Schlosser's judgement on the
two men is altogether faulty, and as he is the representative of a
party, he must be answered. " Castellio," he says, " who had
been already called a knave on the title-page of Calvin's work,
(he probably had not read Castellio' s miserable production), could
naturally not remain silent. He spoke, however, discreetly ; but
Beza replied with much gall, and called him a devil and so forth :
' Quid est diabolum agere, si hoc non est}' I answer, that a satanic-
ironical attack of such a doctrine of Scripture well deserves such
an answer as Beza's." The jest, a la Voltaire, on sacred things
could not fail to excite the zeal of these men for the honour of
God. Had they not responded to the call, they would themselves
have been guilty. Both acted from inward conviction, not from
enmity. Beza's biographer forgets this. Schlosser supposes
that " Beza sacrificed his honour to friendship, and Calvin re-
warded him with the place of rector of the academy in Geneva,
that all Europe might see that he regarded him as a man of
learning." There is here a fundamental error. It proceeds on the
supposition that Calvin bribed his friend ; that he who strove for
divine truth alone was impelled merely by the love of learning
or the desire of fame. But both these great men were far supe-
rior to ambition, or the wish for human honour. No reforma-
tion would have been effected had they been subject to the little
feelings here ascribed to them. It is also false that Calvin called
his opponent a knave. In the French copy he translates the
word nebulo by un brouillon, an idle-talker or babbler, which is
but a mild expression.
Calvin himself was not contented with his second work. It
merely repeated what had been often said before, and he despised
the abuse heaped on him by his opponent. We will therefore
give Beza's sharp dialectics in certain passages of the confuta-
tion, especially where he cites Calvin, and strives with his argu-
ment. It is interesting to see with what truthfulness and affec-
tion he defends him. Calvin's object was not to enter into a
particular reply, but simply to show that he was no blasphemer.
It is worthy of observation, however, that he establishes the
innate will on the firm foundation of practical utility. This he
does, although in appearance and in theory he seems to oppose
it. The whole force of Castellio's argument was derived from
the notion that such was the case, and that morality was alto-
gether annihilated by the system of the reformer. Calvin was
A.D. 1552.] CALVIN AND CASTELLIO. 157
more distressed at this accusation than at any other. It made
it appear that he was guilty of a foolish inconsequence. But he
now proved how the doctrine of predestination had grown up
with his whole being, and complains that it was despised on his
account, and that to God's dishonour. To all the insults uttered
by Castellio, he continually replies that his doctrine was that of
the Holy Scriptures. " Bark," he says, " as much as you like,
you will no more bow God's glory to the dust, than you could
darken the light of the sun by spitting at it*." And that Calvin
spoke the truth appeared as clear as the sun.
Castellio kept back his name, and played the character of a
well-meaning man (though his conduct at Geneva shows that he
could act in a very different spirit), and of one who desired to
promote the unity of the church. He humbly besought Calvin
to explain to him some difficulties in the doctrine of predestina-
tion, which seemed to resemble that of the ancient Fate, that he
might be able to answer the objections of opponents.
Calvin was much more excited than Beza. This is apparent
from his work written at the period of which we are speakingf.
The well-known expressions, in reference to Castellio, are found
in its pages : — " Verily," he says, " would I a thousand times
rather that the earth should swallow me up, than that I should
fail to listen to that which the Spirit of God reveals to me by the
mouth of the prophet, or refuse to bear the insult through which
the majesty of God is abased. If there be but a spark of piety
in us, such shameful conduct must needs kindle in us the fire of
the highest indignation. As far as I am concerned, I will rather
rave than not be angry."
When the news soon after arrived that Castellio was dead,
Beza expressed himself to Bullinger in the following terms : " I
was too true a prophet, I find, to Castellio, when I told him that
the Lord would quickly revenge his blasphemies, little willing
as I am to judge of the dead."
We must here remark, in conclusion, that the great doctrine
of predestination, after it had gained a complete victory in the
reformed church, reached its end, and annihilated the Catholic
Pelagianism, again sunk from the firmament. It still lives in
Scotland, and among the Methodists. No stronger opponent,
however, was found to it than the first leader of the Methodists,
* Opus. p. 642, ad Art. X. " Latra quantum voles : non magis tuis male-
dictis obrues Dei gloriam, quam solis fulgorem spuendo obscurabis."
f Ed. Laus. Ep. 393. Ed. Amst. p. 237.
158 CONTROVERSY ON THE TRINITY. [CHAP. IV.
Wesley, who on this account separated from Whitfield, the con-
stant and powerful advocate of the divine decrees. Wesley em-
ployed the same arguments as Castellio, but with the greatest
dignity ; and nothing in modern times of a stronger character,
I might say of a more terrible one, has been advanced against
Calvin's doctrine, than the reasoning of Wesley, the founder of
the Methodists.
Calvin felt to the last that it was his duty to contend for his
doctrine. He again, in later years, expressed his indignation,
that men hated the system out of hatred to him. " God's ho-
nour," he exclaims, u is trodden under foot, truth is falsified, the
unity of the faith torn asunder, the concord of the church de-
stroyed, and its peace ruined ; — and would you have me slum-
ber*?" At the end of the work against Castellio he says, si I
would fain know why you accuse me of cruelty, except on account
of your teacher Servetus, for whom, notwithstanding, I prayed
that the judges would allow him a milder death."
These words will lead us to the consideration of the following
memorable occurrences.
CHAPTER IV.
calvin's second great controversy, on the trinity,
1553. DISPUTE WITH servetus. ITS consequences.
A dark cloud appears at this epoch to be sinking upon the path
of the reformer. Calvin entered upon the new year with Beza's
blessing. " I adjure thee, beloved father," he said, " to persevere
in thy work, and be sure that, as thou hast often found it to be
the case, our united prayers will be a thousand fold mightier in thy
behalf, than all the efforts of the servants of Satan against thee."
But at present everything was adverse to him in the little re-
public. His influence sank to so low an ebb, that he broke forth
into loud complaints, in a letter addressed to Bullinger, in the
September of the year above-mentioned. The senate was against
him ; his enemies were at the head of the dominant party. The
libertines were rejoiced at the prospect of being at length able
to overpower him. To accomplish this object they must deprive
* MS. Bern. Jul. 4, 1558.
A.D. 1553.] ILLNESS OF FAREL. 159
the clergy of all share in the management of the state. In this
they succeeded. Amied Perrini was chief of the senate, as first
syndic. He and his party ventured on the 6th of February to
assert, with loud clamours, in the Council of Two Hundred, when
that body was engaged in the election of the lesser council, that
they were treated with great severity, and were even cast into
prison, which was a punishment proper only for murderers,
thieves and traitors.
A violent tumult followed this assertion, and it was imme-
diately proposed, without a dissentient voice, that all the mini-
sters should be expressly excluded from the general council ; for
why, it was asked, should preachers be members of that body,
when the priests had formerly been denied a place there ? Cal-
vin, who was present, immediately answered, " That the preachers
believed themselves bound by their duty as citizens to take part
in the council. The comparison which had been made was not
a just one, for the priests did not recognise the temporal power."
But on the 16th of March it was resolved, that the attendance
of ministers should be dispensed with. Their children, however,
were not excluded. At the end of the year the opposite party
endeavoured to overturn the entire constitution of the church,
by insisting upon the administration of the sacrament to every
one, without regard to his moral character. Their plan was one
of great extent, as appeared from the sequel. On the 11th of
April it was declared that the refugees, of whom many were citi-
zens, were disarmed, and might only wear a sword, the use even
of this being restricted to their own houses, or when they were
on a journey. They were also prohibited from forming part of
the guard, but were to aid in its support by money.
The influence of the first syndic, and the general triumph of
Calvin's enemies, tended greatly to depress the power of the
consistory.
Calvin's old and faithful friend Farel had fallen ill in March,
and all hope of his recovery was given up. Calvin hastened to
him at Neuchatel, attended by several of the refugees. Farel
exhibited his noble testament, and Calvin subscribed it. To the
great joy, however, of all, Farel recovered, and Calvin, who had
prayed that his friend might survive him, saw his wish fulfilled,
when he was preparing himself for a long separation*. Calvin
still desired for himself ten years of active labour in the cause of
the church, and they were allowed him. " Let us," he said to
* Ed. Laus. Ep. 145. Ed. Amstel. p. 69, a. Calv. Farello, 6 Cal. Apr. 1553.
160 ACCOUNT OF SERVETUS. [CHAP. IV.
Farel, Ci so live to Christ, that we may every day be prepared to
die to Him/5 It was a year of persecution for many. The
glorious strength of true martyrdom, and the weakness of that
which was only pretended, now showed itself in the most con-
spicuous manner. Six weeks before the trial of Servetus, the
catholics had burnt three protestants at Lyons. Calvin described
to Farel the resolution of a merchant*, who went to execution
with wonderful tranquillity. His relations and friends had em-
ployed every means to induce him to recant. At the moment
when they were using their last endeavours, a woman was seen
to approach the scaffold : she threw herself three times at his
feet ; but he quietly repelled her entreaties f. It was his mother.
The execution of the three young students at Lyons, before
alluded to, took place this year.
Many of Calvin's friends would fain have seen this period of
his history wholly obliterated ; and there are others who could
conceive the idea of writing his life, without entering into any
particular account of the affair of Servetus. I do not agree with
them. It is here that Calvin appears in his real character ; and
a nearer consideration of the proceeding, — examined, that is, from
the point of view furnished by the age when it took place, — will
completely exonerate him from blame. His conduct was not
determined by personal feeling: it was the consequence of a
struggle which this great man had carried on for years against
tendencies to a corruption of doctrine which threatened the church
with ruin. Every age must be judged according to its pre-
vailing laws ; and Calvin cannot be fairly accused of any greater
offence than that with which we may be charged for punishing
certain crimes with death. It has been rightly said, that both
the legal and theological feeling of the age, expressed as we find
it in a variety of striking forms, allows not a shadow of suspicion
to fall upon Calvin's integrity for demanding a judgement which
was, in every respect, justified by the laws of the state. Papistical
pamphleteers, swallowing the entire history of the Inquisition,
and straining at this one execution for heresy, present a ludi-
crous instance of hypocrisy, as they come forth, with pious mien,
to declaim and rave against the cruelty of Calvin.
At the burning pile, where Servetus suffered, the whole Chris-
tian church may adduce, through all ages, the fundamental truths
which it is its duty to uphold, and prove its faith far better than
* Ed. Laus. Ep. 156. Ed. Amstel. p. 70.
t Beza, Hist. Eccles. t. i. p. 88.
A.D. 1553.] ACCOUNT OF SERVETUS. 161
in sight of the numberless iniquities perpetrated, from century
to century, in catholic lands, by the blind rage or ferocity of
inquisitors. According to Calvin's system every human action
comes within the scope of God's providence. This appears in
the last controversy ; and it is a fact that the misfortunes of Ser-
vetus became eventually, through the inquiries which they oc-
casioned, a source of good. Light has been thrown on man)r
opinions, and Servetus by his death, strangely enough, aided
in one respect, though in a way very different to that which he
sought, the object which he proposed to himself, — the reforma-
tion of the world. His burning pile will ever remain a conspi-
cuous point in history. The great question respecting the de-
fence of the church, of its purity and unity, against daring blas-
phemers, will be repeatedly renewed. That flaming pile however
stands as the boundary between the barbarous middle ages and
modern times, in which new principles are in operation, and by
which we are to learn how far tolerance is possible.
We are here to contemplate two men, meeting in the dark
ways of life, the contrast between whom is such as has rarely
been witnessed. On the one side was the zeal of Elias, on the
other a blind fanaticism ; the one a true reformer, the other a
would-be reformist. Both were sincere in their intentions, and
the one overthrew the other for the honour of the Lord. It is
interesting for us, in these tranquil times, to behold the struggle
of two such inquirers, the one striving for pure evangelical doc-
trine, the other for a fantastical-philosophic Bible-system. The
picture becomes still more striking when we see in the one the
representative of the sacred doctrines of the church in all ages,
and in the other a precursor of the champions of philosophic
religion in later times. Of these, some have not unfrequently
meant the good of Christianity. Servetus, we may remark, did
not thoroughly understand himself. There was much in him
which was still chaotic, but which in later times has come forth
in the light of pure thought. In Calvin, on the contrary, all was
already clear and complete.
Mention has been made, in the first part of this work, of his
proceedings against Servetus, and the question was suggested,
whether he repented of his conduct. But to expect that he
would feel as we now do, or to make him responsible, as is the
practice of his enemies, for all the coarse severity of his times, is
manifestly an absurdity. That he should regret the death of
Servetus is to look for too much from him, and utterly to mis-
VOL. II. m
162 ACCOUNT OF SERVETUS. [CHAP. IV.
take the character of the age. The only glimmering of anything
of this kind which we can see is in those moments when he
seemed to breathe the new spirit of the period which was just
commencing. But in Servetus a bold and restless nature ruled
unconcealed. With nothing actually opposed to Christianity in
his will, he cherished in his thoughts an unpardonably rash and
blasphemous notion. To this sin he adhered to the last; for
this he suffered death. We see in the whole the germ of a new,
free-thinking age. An obscure presentiment of this coming time
wrought on the mind of Servetus ; and amidst all the folly and
all the sin thus exhibited, there is still something to interest.
We would gladly not regard him as an enemy. It is natural for
us to defend those who have atoned for their crimes. But I must
ask of all the opponents of Calvin, whether, when they find Ser-
vetus perpetually pouring out his blasphemies, they would be-
come responsible for these devilries before God ? or whether they
would not rather join with Calvin and his age in taking up the
stone against him ? I take it up.
I will here quote a passage which has never yet been brought
against him, but which tends to throw new light upon his extra-
ordinary character. In order to make the doctrine of the incar-
nation appear ridiculous, he insultingly exclaims, 6i If the Word
had become flesh, as woman, then they would have called the
Word itself the Son of God, and the woman herself the daughter
of man. Hence the Son of God would have been of two sexes."
And further, " If the angels, in like manner, were to take asses5
bodies, you must allow that then they would be asses, and they
would die in their asses^-skins : they would be four-footed ani-
mals, and would have long ears. So too you must allow, that
were you right, God himself might be an ass ; the Holy Spirit
a mule; and that He would die if the mule died. O the won-
drously altered animal ! Can we be surprised if the Turks think
us more ridiculous than asses and mules ? " It is with grief
that we copy this ; but it is necessary to show the blasphemous
sport which Servetus made of holy things.
That man must indeed have been remarkable whom catholics
and protestants equally hate; whom both parties condemn with
horror ; and who, when found guilty by the whole world, could
venture to call upon God and Christ with fervent supplications,
and in words which had an edifying sound, as if, indeed, the Spirit
of truth dwelt with the culprit. The smoke which arose from
Champel long darkened the pure gladsome air of the Geneva
A.D. 1553.] CALVIN AND SERVETUS CONTRASTED. 163
Lake. But now, after three centuries, when we only desire the
truth, independent of party interests, the history of Calvin lies
clear before us. Public opinion has fixed a brand upon his name.
The world has done this because it has no proper understanding
either of Servetus or of the character of his age. I shall relate
the events of which we are speaking as fully, and yet as succinctly,
as possible, and adduce all that can be advanced for Servetus,
filling up what may still appear wanting in the evidence on his
behalf. The remarkable life of this man ; his genial nature ; the
rareness of his works ; his end ; his system, so imperfectly com-
prehended even by himself, and which Calvin examined only
from the point of view which the church afforded, — these have
all tended infinitely to increase the difficulty of the subject*.
While Servetus presented a singular contrast to Calvin, both
in his inner and in his general spiritual character, the contrast
was scarcely less remarkable in the circumstances of their lives.
The reformer was distinguished by his clear and logical intelli-
gence. Servetus was no less so for his fantastic imaginativeness,
and for his defective argumentation. With Calvin there was the
profound religious feeling, which proves true faith; with Servetus,
on the contrary, there was no acknowledgment of sin, but a mere
philosophical element, altogether deficient in clearness. In the
one, christian firmness and determination were conspicuous ; in
the other, indecision, the result of inward excitement, as if the
spirit of Ahasuerus dwelt in him, was the main characteristic.
The one would have been named by the Saviour, a son of thunder ;
whilst he would have regarded the other with melancholy ; Ser-
* The documents before me are, 'The Writings of Servetus ;' Calvin's work
referring especially to him ; and, besides the labours of Mosheim and Trechsel,
the last publication of Nilliet (Relation du Proces Criminel intente a Geneve
a Michel Servet. 1844). An abstract of the reports of the trial have also been
preserved at Bern ; they agree with those which Mosheim had before him.
The discovery of the original, however, is still of importance, as proving the
fidelity of Mosheim's report. Some additional details are very precious. This
is especially the case in regard to the proof which the author produces, that
Calvin enjoyed so little favour with the council that he could employ no influ-
ence on the trial. The fact however that Servetus was condemned, not as a
blasphemer, but for political offences, is not clearly proved. M. de la Roche,
the editor of the ' Bibliotheque Anglaise,' who wrote a short history of Ser-
vetus, published in 1/17 extracts from the reports of the trial. Mosheim's
learned work appeared at Helmstadt in 1748. I have also referred to the im-
portant work of the same author, ' Neue Nachrichten von dem beriihmten Spa-
nischen Artzte Mich. Servet. 1750,' and to the Abbe d'Artigny's ' Nouv.
Memoires de Critique et de Litterateur/ 1749, t. ii. art. 1 ] . The latter author
had the acts of the process against Servetus at Vienne before him, and he
proves convincinglv that Mosheim was not to be depended upon.
M L>
164 CHARACTER OF SERVETUS. [CHAP. VI.
vetus receiving the reproach with disdain, till in his last hour a
better spirit seemed to take possession of his soul.
And as the inner characters of these men differed, so was the
outward course of their lives various. Servetus represented
himself, from the beginning, as a new prophet ; as one appointed
to regenerate Christendom, and as raised above both catholics
and protestants. But notwithstanding this boast, he was doubt-
ful and perplexed. We may properly compare him to Hamlet,
whose judgement, in reference to his goodwill, was too weak for
the great part which he had undertaken, and who therefore had
an appearance of insanity. In a similar manner Servetus had
not ability corresponding to his extensive design, but yet was
skilful enough to disturb the reformation in the south. He was
deficient in understanding, and therefore indulged in vain and
wanton blasphemies. In one point, however, both these oppo-
nents agreed : they were alike in the outburst of feeling, except
that Calvin exhibited more of anger ; the Spaniard more of
haughtiness and heat.
Mosheim estimates the mental qualities of Servetus at a high
degree, and places them on a level with Calvin's*. A later writer
says of him, " He had a certain penetrating acuteness of mind,
which was subsequently increased by his study of the law, — a
powerful fancy, which held the understanding in abeyance. He
was skilled in analysing, and could annihilate by his critical
acumen the notions of others, but he could not bridle his own
imagination, or reduce his thoughts to a tranquil and logical de-
velopment. By his natural wit he could everywhere discover
types, similes, analogies, allegories, but could not perceive the
eccentricity and perverseness of his own opinions f" I place his
natural gifts very high ; his moral culture very low. He failed
altogether in practical virtue, and consequently in the knowledge
of his times, and in a proper feeling for the unity of the church.
Calvin was at this time deeply impressed, as we have shown,
with the necessity of preserving this unity : he was anxiously
desirous to prevent the existence of any doubt respecting his
agreement with Melancthon. But the fearful disturbance excited
by the controversy with Servetus threatened to destroy not only
the unity of the church, but the church itself. He grasped at
not one principle merely, but at the very heart of truth. Thus
* Mosheim, Gesch. Servet's, s. 254. f Trechsel, Antitrinitarier, s. 62.
A.D. 1553.] ACCOUNT OF SERVETUS. 165
he assailed the triune Deity and the person of the Redeemer, not
in reverent language, but in that of blasphemy; not as a scholar
for scholars, but as a reformer who wished to introduce a new
Christianity, and deprive the people of the old. In this character
he opposed himself to Calvin, summoned him forth, and sought
to place him on a new and dizzy height, in the hope of making
him renounce his doctrine. We feel how great must have been
the indignation of the watchman of Israel at these attempts,
which he beheld from far. The ardour of his character and his
sense of duty must indeed have been roused to the utmost, when,
in the progress of events, he knew that all must be saved or all
be lost.
The history of Servetus may be divided into three periods :
1. That during which he was developing his system, and when
he first appeared, a period extending to the year 1532, when he
left Basel and Strasburg. 2. That from 1532 to 1553, during
which he lived in various parts of France, and printed his great
work. And 3. The period of his trial and death.
In the first of these periods he was known as well by the name
of Reves as by that of Serveto. Reves is probably an anagram
of Serveto. In the second period he bore the name of Villano-
vanus ; and in the third he took sometimes the one and some-
times the other. During the first of these periods his mind was
still comparatively sober; but there was, notwithstanding, no
slight degree of irreverence in his view of the opinion held by
the church on God. The period closed with the publication of
his work on the errors regarding this doctrine. In the second
period his mind rose to the highest degree of exaltation : he felt
himself called upon to contend in the host of Michael. In the
third he stood before the two tribunals. There were now strug-
gling in him the good and the evil principle, fear, confidence,
despondency, pride, truth and falsehood. In the end faith con-
quered, as far as he was capable of its impressions, and he died
in anguish and terror, obtaining the sympathy which is allowed
to a bowed and hesitating soul. That which he wrote to CEco-
lampadius at the beginning of his career deserves to be cited as
highly characteristic of his nature : u God knows/5 he says,
"that my conscience is clear in all that 1 have written/'
The difficulty which we find in giving any account of his life
arises especially from this, that we can learn it only from his own
mouth; from the information which he gave to the judges at
Yicnnc, and which contradicts that given before those of Geneva.
166 ACCOUNT OF SERVETUS. [CHAP. IV.
The declaration made at Vienne, and which Artigny has adopted,
can only be followed with the greatest caution. Servetus on
that occasion wove a web of falsehoods, to deliver himself from
the danger with which he was threatened, and to prove that he
was not Servetus, but Villeneuve. In Geneva, on the contrary,
he appeared as Servetus : believing that it would then avail him
nothing to conceal his history, he spoke with much freedom.
The christian name of Servetus was Michael : he was born of
christian parents at Villanueva, a city of Arragon, in the same
year (1509) as Calvin: his father was a jurist and advocate, not
of Jewish descent, as the judges supposed in their desire to ac-
count for the supposed hatred of Servetus to Christianity by
tracing it to his birth. It reported that he was brought up in a
Dominican convent. His frame was weak ; he himself speaks of
a double injury which he had received, and of his unfitness for
marriage : but his appearance was agreeable; and in the engraving
which Mosheim gives, from an excellent portrait of him, the ex-
pression of his eye is free and somewhat wandering. At Vienne
he stated that in his fourteenth year he entered the service of
Quintana, the confessor of Charles V., and in the year 1529 was
present, as one of his train, at the famous meeting which termi-
nated with the coronation of the emperor. The passage occurs
in the c Restitutio,' where he exclaims, "These mine eyes beheld
the pope, exalted with vast pomp above the greatest personages,
and worshiped by crowds, which knelt before him in the street ;
those considering themselves the happiest of people who could
kiss his feet or his slippers." Then exciting himself to the highest
degree of indignation, he continued, " O thou beast, of all beasts
the most wicked ; of all harlots the most shameless ! M
He subsequently went into Germany, in the train of the em-
peror, and after the death of Quintana he proceeded to Paris.
Quintana stated that he knew him by sight (which certainly does
not prove that he was familiar with him), and he expressed the
greatest anger and vexation that this Spaniard was the author of
the work against the Trinity. He had already probably become
connected with the free-thinkers in Italy.
At Geneva he stated that his father sent him to Toulouse to
study the law. This is worthy of credit, although D'Artigny
here contradicts Mosheim. It is probable that he had left Quin-
tana after the journey into Italy, in his nineteenth year, and
before he went to Paris. He had no reason for inventing the
statement referred to at Geneva, and his writings afford many
A.D. 1553.] WRITINGS OF SERVETUS. 1G7
indications of legal study. At the university he formed the new
idea of a further reformation, and then, for the first time, read
the Bible, and, as it seerns, in the original language. His first
work proves that he had been long acquainted with plans of re-
formation. Like Calvin, he began his career with the study of
the law ; but we at once discover the different character of their
minds, the Spaniard early devoting a portion of his time to astro-
logy, while he despised the philosophy of Aristotle.
But the impulse which he felt to promote the salvation of
mankind left him no rest. He read most of the fathers of the
church, especially all who lived before Arius. In Tertullian
and Irenaeus was found, he thought, the true christian doctrine :
he also carefully studied the catholic doctors of the middle ages ;
and lastly, he read such of the writings of the German reformers
as were circulated in France. He had undoubtedly by this time
renounced Romanism ; but he appears to have thought that the
reformers had accomplished only half a work. Proclaiming him-
self even then in the most perfect opposition to the age, he de-
clared that it was not lawful for a christian to punish his fellow-
man with death*; and desired to reveal to the world, as an
instrument of the Holy Ghost, the being of God and of the
Saviour.
This was the groundwork of the seven books on the i Errors
in the Doctrine of the Trinity.' But he could not remain safe at
Toulouse ; the parliament there had always proved itself san-
guinary : he accordingly left France and went to Basel, where
Zwingli's reformation was established, in order to make his views
known to GCcolampadius, as the foundation of a further improve-
ment in the church.
Of the spiritual state of Servetus, and of the nature of the
mysterious thoughts which urged him on, and possessed him even
in his early years, we learn somewhat from his work on Justifi-
cation f: " I agree," he exclaims, "neither with protestants nor
catholics in all things, neither am I opposed to them. Each
seems to me to have a portion of truth and also of error : the one
looks down upon the error of the other and* forgets his own : God
grant that we may discover our mistakes, and without pride or
obstinacy. How easy would it be to separate truth from error,
if it were allowed to all to speak their minds in peace; to strive
to instruct themselves ; and if the spirits of the old prophets were
* Serv. CEcolarapadio, Mosheim, p. 393.
f De Justificat. c. 4, <le Charit.
1G8 SERVETUS ON THE TRINITY. [CHAP. IV.
.subjected to the new, and became silent, according to the com-
mandment of Paul, when the latter, as often as somewhat is
revealed to them, speak. But those of our times are only strug-
gling for honour. May the Lord destroy all tyrants of the
church*!" In another place he expresses the hope that the
catholic church might be converted : " God will, sooner or later,
open the minds of the monks, that they may understand the
mystery of Christ and the power of his faith, which alone can
purge their consciences from a gloomy superstition, and free it
of its fetters : then will they bitterly lament the great relapse of
Christianity into Judaism, the consequence of doubt and igno-
rance, and of their not distinguishing between the Law and the
Gospelf" He speaks exceedingly well on the power of faith :
"Such was the high degree of excellency to which Luther at-
tained in faith, that no danger could appal him : he overcame all
the powers of hell, of death and the devil. Through this secure
strength of faith he could command the powers of heaven and
earth, with such success, that he could bring the angels from
heaven to serve him in the wilderness, where he was left forsaken.
I doubt not but that this might take place, for hell has no force
against believers, any more than it has against Christ : they are
made partakers of his kingdom and of his power, and all which
He has done shall they also do, if they have faith in Him J."
The novelty of his notions excited surprise and alarm : he
ruined his cause with the gentle CEcolampadius by his rash ex-
pressions. The principal point in dispute between them referred
to the person of Christ. Servetus denied the union of the two
natures : Christ, he said, can only be eternal in the sense in which
the world is eternal, the idea thereof being eternal in God. This
controversy, Ruchat states §, was carried on quietly between the
two disputants by letter. Servetus, as so often happens in such
cases, to satisfy CEcolampadius, concealed his philosophical errors
under a seemingly orthodox confession; but CEcolampadius was
not to be deceived, and in a conference with Zwingli and Bullin-
ger he proved the danger of the opinions which Servetus had
advanced. The latter now printed his work c De Trinitatis Er-
roribus? at Hagenau, to which place he went himself to speak
with the printer, John Sarcerius.
* By the old prophets were meant the protestant and catholic teachers.
Servetus wished to represent himself as the one prophet now enjoying revela-
tion.
t Mosheim, s. 53. X McKsheim, s. 53. Dc Ju&tiiicat. c. 3, 4.
§ Mosheim contradicts this, s. 16 and 389-92.
A.D. 1553.] SERVETUS ON THE TRINITY. 169
The plan of the work consists mainly in an endeavour to
prove the great mystery of the Trinity through the man, the
historical Christ. Thus the author seeks, in the first place, to
show that this man is Jesus Christ ; that He is the Son of God ;
and lastly, that He is God himself*.
No sooner had the work made its appearance than the clamour
against it became universal. It was felt that the seeming belief
of the writer did, in reality, tread the holy creed of true christians
in the dust. People could scarcely understand how Servetus
had dared to conceive such extraordinary errors in respect to a
doctrine which had been so long free from attack. It was even
fabled that he had made a journey into Africa, and had gathered
his notions from the Koran : this idea seemed justified by the
fact, that he had employed arguments from that book to illustrate
his reasoning.
Servetus exhibited in this his first work the pride and bitter-
ness which never left him. His principles are very apparent,
and it naturally excites surprise, that in the one-and-twentieth
year of his age he could undertake to attempt the reformation of
religion and philosophy with such a show of knowledge. His
doctrine was original. The antitrinitarians before him were of
little account. He professed that the Holy Scriptures were the
source of all his knowledge : in the same manner he asserted that
they had both a literal and a mystical, or spiritual signification ;
the former depended upon history, the latter upon Christ. True
Christianity, according to him, had been darkened through the
Aristotelian philosophy, and a want of the knowledge of Hebrew.
Paul of Samosata, he said, who represented Christ as man, bad
originally a perception of the truth. The doctrine of the Trinity
was framed in opposition to the heretics who existed at the time
when the pope assumed the sovereignty of the church f. It was
then that we lost Christ. The two principles on which Servetus
founds his reasonings are the incommunicability of the divine
essence ; for God is one, and therefore the modifications in God
can only be variations or forms, and not persons. God is incom-
prehensible without a revelation. To make himself known He
has sent forth two forms or manifestations, the Son and Spirit.
He desires therefore the Father, Son and Holy Ghost to be ac-
* See the abstract of the work in Trechsel, Antitrinitarier, s. 68.
f De Trin. Error, lib. 7- tbl. 3,6. " Puto fuisse divinee punitionis judicium
ut eodem tempore Papa efficerctur rex, quo estTrinitas orta, et tunc C hristum
perdidimus."
170 SERVETUS AND ZWINGLI. [CHAP. IV.
knowledged ; but only in the sense in which the Latins use the
word, persona, as representing an outward form. The operation,
which is called " the Word," became flesh : God, that is, united
himself in this manner with man : Christ therefore is God, and
must be adored. The Holy Ghost is a divine energy ; an angel.
This Trinity is not eternal, but, like the world, is eternal accord-
ing to the divine idea : ideal as Logos : real only in the world.
This new system of ideas would have had even an attractive
appearance, had not Servetus heaped terrific abuse upon the
ancient faith of the church, calling the persons of the Godhead
inventions of the devil, and the triune Deity a hell-hound. So
much that was new was here thrust upon the world that catholics
and protestants agreed in their expression of indignation. Quin-
tana, ofTended beyond measure that a Spaniard was the author
of such a work, obtained immediately an imperial order, that the
book should be everywhere suppressed. The protestants were
in still greater excitement. Servetus was in communion with
them, and they might be accused of agreeing with him in opinion.
It happened that about this time Melancthon wrote in the
strongest terms respecting him to Camerarius : " Good God !
what tragedies will not the questions, whether the Logos and the
Holy Ghost be persons, create for future times ? " To Brentius
he complains especially, that the Logos should be represented
only as the thinking Father, or as his Voice. He calls Servetus
a fanatic*.
Zwingli, eminently discreet, spoke, a year before his death, in
the most marked manner in regard to Servetus. In the last
month of 1530, when Servetus visited CEcolampadius, Zwingli
was one day in company with Capito, Bucer and Bullinger; they
conversed together on the great phenomena of the times ; and
Bullinger reports to us the earnest words of the reformer, words
which indicate the attention paid at that period to this comet-
like, meteoric apparition f : " This year J," he says, " I was pre-
sent at a conversation between the pious and beloved servant of
God, John CEcolampadius, with Capito and Bucer, in which they
discussed how the pure, genuine, evangelical truth and doctrine
might be further promoted and upheld in the midst of the present
difficulties and opposition. And CEcolampadius greatly com-
plained that he had with him at Basel a rash and obstinate Spa-
niard, Michael Servetus, who was perpetually annoying him with
* Epist. Mel. ed. Peuc. p. 97-106.
f Mosheim, s. 17, 18. J 1530.
A.D. 1553.] SERVETUS IN GERMANY. 1 71
troublesome questions, and talking and acting in a way which
proved that he was an Arian. And it was plain that he did not
confine his wickedness to CEcolampadius, but poured it out
among others. Thereupon Zwingli said, ' Brother CEcolam-
padius, you must beware and watch, and take good heed ; for the
false and evil doctrine of that rash Spaniard will otherwise ruin
the whole system of our religion : since, if Christ be not truly
the eternal God, so neither is He, nor can be, our Saviour; and
thus all will be false which the holy prophets, the apostles and
the churches have taught, and of this we are more than certain.
God forbid that such wickedness should ever appear among us,
either now or at any future period. Lose no time then, but em-
ploy all diligence. Let him state fully his argument, and try
whether you cannot turn and win him to the truth by good and
clear reasoning.' GCcolampadius answered, ' I have already
attempted this ; but he is so proud, presumptuous and quarrel-
some, that it has been all to no purpose.5 Zwingli said, 6 This
must not be endured in the church of God, therefore do what
you can to prevent the blasphemy from getting abroad, to the
injury of Christianity/" This incident shows that Zwingli
thought that Servetus should, at all events, be removed, for the
safety of the church.
It is probable that Servetus, having found a publisher for his
work in Alsace, removed in the year 1531 from Basel to Stras-
burg. He was afterwards in Germany ; and it is reported that
he even heard Luther and Melancthon ; but this is involved in
doubt*, as is also the question whether he was in Germany after
the appearance of his first work, and why he left that country.
Supposing that he did visit Germany before the year 1530, and
his work appeared a year later, the old mistake is settled, namely,
that the first article of the Augsburg Confession was directed
against his sect. It is certain however that he again visited Basel,
and lived for some time, in the middle of the year 1531, with his
friend Marinus. CEcolampadius gave him an ungracious recep-
tion, and informed the council of his arrival ; but he was induced
to speak of him, with some degree of gentleness, in a judgement
which he was required to give by that assembly. Such was his
anger however at the work of Servetus, that he aroused Bucer
against him, and botli he and Capito became his determined an-
tagonists. Servetus had visited them while his book was in the
press, and explained his system. Both felt more and more con-
* Mosheim, s. 393. Fiisslini Centuria I. Epp. Reform. Helv. p. 77.
172 SERVETUS RETRACTS. [CHAP. IV.
vinced of the dangerous character of the man, and Bucer began
to preach openly against him. It required some boldness to
enter upon such a discussion ; and the Spaniard exhibited at the
same time rashness, versatility, and a glowing imagination. The
representations of the Strasburgers were of no avail: he put his
name to the work, and set the Inquisition at defiance. The pub-
lisher and printer were more cautious, and were silent as to the
place where it was printed. When the work began to make a
noise, Bucer was again ready to assail Servetus, and such was
his indignation that he exclaimed in the pulpit, " Servetus de-
serves to have his entrails torn from his body*."
We see from the general feeling respecting him, how con-
spicuous the man had made himself, and how much he was
dreaded, long before the controversy between him and Calvin.
It is not unreasonably conjectured that he was required in Basel,
before he was allowed to leave the city, to make a retractation of
his errors, a statement to this effect appearing at the beginning
of a little work printed after his stay at Basel j. In this docu-
ment he humbly prays to be pardoned the offence which he had
given; he accuses his own understanding, and calls his writing
perplexed and obscure. With this perhaps may be conjoined
his Essay on Justification, OEcolampadius having objected to
him, that he had insulted the faith of the Lutherans in regard to
this doctrine.
But even this retractation bears with it marks of his charac-
teristic insolence. He unsays all that he had stated; but as
childish and imperfect, not as false. An advance, however, is
visible in the new work ; the Logos is more noticed, and the
Father retreats : man and God penetrate Christ, but without
confusion. In justification, the writer takes a middle course
between the Catholic and Lutheran doctrine. The consciousness
of sin is obscure, according to his representation, and the idea of
justification is proportionably uncertain. Works have a reward,
and both Jews and heathen will receive it. The will is free to
perform good works, though grace alone conducts to the king-
dom of God. He here takes occasion to ridicule the doctrine of
the reformers, that good works proceed necessarily from faith.
* Ed. Laus. Ep. 126. Ed. Amstel. p. 70. " Bucerus, cum alioqui mansuetus
esset ingenio, pro suggestu pronuntiavit, dignum esse, qui avulsis visceribus
discerperetur."
t He wrote two discourses on the Trinity, with a little essay on the Right-
eousness of Christ's Kingdom. Dialogorum de Trinitate libri duo, de Justitia
Regni Christi capp. iv.
A.D. 1553.] JOURNEYS OF SERVETUS. 1 7 o
Servetus discovered, after his first ill-judged experiment, that
it was no easy matter to accomplish a reformation ; nor was there,
full of ardour as he was, a single trace of the heroism of a martyr
in his disposition. Leaving Germany, he proposed to take up
his abode in France; and in order to avoid being tried as a heretic,
he rejected the name of Serveto and Reves, and called himself
Michael of Villanueva.
Here begins the second epoch of his unsettled career, 1532-
1553. He tells us that in the year 1534 he studied mathematics
and medicine at Paris, in the ' College de Calvi/ and subse-
quently in the c College de Lombards/ He lived securely
under the name which he had assumed, till he was condemned
at Vienne, as Villeneuve, to the flames. It was not till he went
to Geneva that his true name was known. He was probably
first at Lyons, for the purpose of circulating his books.
We have seen that in the year 1534, Calvin, still young, but
already celebrated, was at Paris, endeavouring to fortify the
evangelical church against the dangers by which it was threatened.
Servetus resolved upon making his acquaintance, and imparting
to him his convictions. The time and place were settled for their
meetings: Calvin kept his appointment, but Servetus did not carry
out his design : he returned to Lyons, and employed himself
about an edition of Ptolemacus. On leaving Paris he went to
Orleans. Joh. Wier relates, that it was while he was there the
disgraceful spectre-tricks were played by the Franciscans ; that
he had several not undistinguished friends, and that among them
was Michael Villanovanus. Joh. Sturm and Sleidan were also
there at that time, as licentiates of law : the latter has described
the scene got up by the conspirators.
Subsequently to this, Servetus spent a year in Italy. Mosheim
speaks of this journey in connection with his first work ; it is not
impossible that he was in Italy at that time also : he may have
made two journeys to that country, or the former one may have
been invented, to afford him, through his connection with Quin-
tal ia, a reputation for orthodoxy. The earlier cited of his writings
on the pope may be referred to this season. The account of his
journey is taken from the preface to his edition of Ptolemaeus,
which appeared in 1535. That he then began to obtain disciples
is shown by one of his apologists, Postellus. It is evident that
his opinions were received favourably at Venice, from the fact
that Melancthon was called upon to address the senate of that
city against his errors. " He is circulating," it was said, "the
174 STUDIES OF SERVETUS. [CHAP. IV.
accursed doctrine of Paul of Samosata, and opposes the doctrine
of the two persons in Christ. The understanding cannot indeed
comprehend how the Word is one person ; but we must rest, in
faith, on the doctrine of the early church and of the apostles, and
thus put Servetus to shame."
In Paris Servetus saw Francis I. touch persons, according to
the old custom, to cure them of the king's-evil : he speaks of
this in his Ptolemaeus, and expresses his doubts on the subject,
not seeing the people healed. It appears that he did not ascribe
the healing power to faith, as we find was the case at that time
in England, where the monarch was supposed to cure the ague
and epilepsy by the touch. Lyons, to which Servetus afterwards
returned, was a polished city : the book-trade flourished there
to a considerable extent, and Servetus became corrector of the
press to the brothers Trechsel, who were celebrated for their ex-
cellent printing. In the year 1537> with what he had gained in
this employment, he went again to Paris, where he obtained the
degree of master, and gave lectures on mathematics and astro-
nomy.
With what extraordinary capacity he was endowed appears
from the fact, that having hitherto devoted himself to the study
of theology, he now pursued with equal ardour the several
branches of natural science, and with such success that in a short
time he was qualified to lecture upon them. We even find him
numbered among the most skilful physicians in France, and it is
said, that it was he who gave the first intimation of the circulation
of the blood*. Nor did he neglect his theological pursuits: he
was still employed about an edition of the Bible. This period
indeed might be accounted the happiest of his life : science was
his proper field ; but dazzled by the unhappy notion that God
would make special use of him for the enlightening of the world,
he was again impelled into fanaticism. How different was this
spiritual darkness to the timidity of which Calvin complains at
the beginning of his course 1
Servetus gave lectures at Paris, in his character of master, on
Ptolemaeus, astronomy and mathematics. A numerous auditory
assembled around him. In the science of medicine he agreed
with the Greek physicians, in opposition to the Arabian. The
controversy between these two parties was one of the topics of
the day. Champier, a physician, and the friend of Servetus, at
Lyons, attributed, in a writing for Leonh. Fuchs, false views to
* Christianismi Restitutio, de Trin, lib. v. pp. 169, 170.
A.D. 1553.] SERVETUS AT CHARLIEU. 175
the former, and accused him of inclining rather to the Arabian
system. This produced an answer from Servetus, and as what-
ever he did he did with talent, a very excellent work, on the use
of Syrups, with a review of theGalenists and Averroists, appeared,
from his pen, at Paris in 1537. This work, as well as the notes
on Ptolemaeus, was written in Latin, and so excellently, that
Mosheim ventures the conjecture, that he intentionally employed
a negligent style in his theological writings, it being a principle
with him that, in matters of religion, language should always be
humble.
But such was the pride of the man, that it prevented his re-
taining his present honourable position. The university and the
faculty rose against him. This was the result partly of envy, and
partly because he had accused many learned men of ignorance,
especially in astronomy. They attacked him in their lectures.
He defended himself by an answer, in which he called them,
among other things, the plague of the world. The dispute at last
reached such a height, that, to get red of him, his enemies em-
ployed, as a pretence, his love of astrology, and he was forbidden
to continue his astronomical lectures. Ke had even had the
boldness, trusting to the anonymous appearance of his theolo-
gical works, every page of which exposed him to the flames, to
submit himself to the judge of heresy at Paris, and was acquitted.
It is incredible how a man who wished to look upon himself
as a chosen servant of God, appointed to restore Christianity,
could devote a part of his life to such follies, and live as a hypo-
crite among his bitterest enemies. He obtained the degree of
doctor of medicine, but it is characteristic of his temper that he
never employed this distinction. On leaving Paris he went to
Avignon, and then again to Lyons. We at length find him in
1538 at Charlieu, a little town not far from Lyons, where he
supported himself as a physician ; but here again his arrogance
destroyed his repose*. He was now thirty years old, and he
thought that he ought to be baptized, at this time, according to
the example of Jesus Christ. So strongly was he convinced on
this point that he even exhorted Calvin himself to take the same
course, that he might receive the Holy Ghostf. Faith, according
to his belief, justifies, but baptism saves. Man thereby becomes
greater than the angels, and is actually born again. It is not
* " On account of that which he there stupidly and insolently attempted,"
says Bolsec, if we may cite his pamphlet.
t Christian. Restitut. p. 615, ep. 15. " Vera Christi fide ad Baptismum
accede ut accipias donum Spir. S. tibi ita promissi."
17^ EDITION OF THE SCRIPTURES. [CHAP. IV.
erroneously conjectured that Servetus secretly received baptism
about this time from some anabaptist in Switzerland or elsewhere,
perhaps even in Charlieu, from a person of this persuasion. Of
this however Calvin expresses a doubt, being inclined to regard
him as a despiser of all religion*. According to a passage in the
c Restitutio t/ he appears to have belonged to some secret sect,
in which the Lord's Supper was administered in a different
manner to that practised among catholics and protestants.
He now removed to Vienne in Dauphine : he there found a
patron in the archbishop, Peter Palmier, who had attended his
lectures at Paris, and was distinguished for his patronage of
science. This exalted personage received him into his palace,
and thus protected he lived in perfect tranquillity, but as a hypo-
crite, for he submitted himself to all the practices of the church.
He thought of this shortly before his death, and expressed his
shame in the presence of the magistrate.
The leisure which he now enjoyed enabled him to prepare a
new edition of Ptolemseus, in which, to avoid offending his pa-
tron, he left out the passage respecting the unfruitfulness of
Canaan, which was afterwards, as we shall see, adduced against
him. This second edition he regarded as his own, and dedicated
it to the archbishop.
As a convincing proof that he never entirely lost sight of a
higher life, he published at this time the translation of the Bible,
made by a learned monk, Xantes Pagninus : he altered it very
little, but appended his own ideas respecting the translation of
the Scriptures : his chief object was to show that the prophecies
which occur in the Old Testament were fulfilled before the coming
of Christ, and refer only in a spiritual sense to his appearance.
There is no levity in this book. According to him, the second
and twenty-second psalms speak of David; the forty-fifth of
Solomon ; but they also prophesy of Christ, because David and
Solomon were types of Him. Thus also, Isaiah meant by the
virgin, Abi, who was to bring King Hezekiah into the world.
In the same manner that prophet mourned the death of Cyrus,
when he spoke of the sufferings and death of the Redeemer.
The preface, in which he criticises the genius of the Hebrew lan-
guage, shows the great talent of the writer : he remarks that no
translation can reach the beauty of the original.
This edition of the Bible did not please the catholics. At
* The baptism of Servetus is denied by Fusslin.
f Apolog. p. 710.
A.D. 1553.] SERVETUS ON THE TRINITY. 1 77
Louvain it was placed in the list of forbidden books. It was
also received very ungraciously in Spain. But Servetus lived
twelve years in peace, and was the regularly appointed physician
of the city ; his zeal however would not suffer him to enjoy any
actual quiet; he was still anxious to play the reformer, and for
this purpose he must issue a new work.
We approach the third period of his history, and the world
has now to become acquainted with his true name. He deter-
mined to issue a manifesto against the prevailing antichristianity :
the Revelation of John and the signs of the times convinced him
that the fall of antichrist was at hand. But we are still interested
in the man : his soul had wings. In the introduction to his last
work, that which brought him to the flames, he says, " We in-
tend to make manifest the divine revelation from the earliest
times — the great mystery of faith, which is superior to all con-
troversy. The God who in former ages was not seen, and whom
we shall now see, because the veil is removed from his face, Him
shall we see shining in ourselves*." He then thus apostro-
phizes the Son of God : " O Christ Jesus, Son of God ! reveal
thyself to thy servant, that this great revelation may be clear to
us in its truth. Give me now thy good spirit and thy mighty
word ; guide my pen and my soul, that 1 may be able to describe
the glory of thy godhead, and to confess to Thee the true faith !
This is thy work, which an inward impulse teaches me to attempt,
being anxious for thy truth. I undertook the same in time past,
and now again I feel myself urged thereto, for the appointed
season is fulfilled. Thou hast taught us that thy light must not
remain hidden, and woe to me if I do not proclaim thy Gospel f."
Servetus may have deeply felt, in the ardour of his imagination,
the great mystery of the being of God. The glowing fancy with
which he was inspired bore him so away that he spoke of himself
as if he had been an apostle of the Lord : he thought that he was
appointed to reveal the all- important truth which had been kept
concealed for centuries. The right faith, according to him, had
been lost in the course of 1260 years, and it was God's will that he
should revive it. Thus speaks the book of Revelation, c. xii. v. 1.
Greater than the disciples of the Lord, he thus stood upon an
equality with the Theosophers, who have taught the hidden truths
of God's being; with those who went out from among the first
teachers ; and also with the philosophers, who reveal the secret
* Prooem. lib. de Trinit. t Ibid.
VOL. II. N
178 DOCTRINES OF SERVETUS. [CHAP. IV.
things of God through the might of the Spirit, and who are there-
fore exalted far above the revelations of the apostles.
His doctrine of the Trinity was then not at all known. Man
could be saved, he said, through a simple belief in the Messias*.
The great mystery seems to have been partly known at the time
of the apostles. John was deeply moved to declare it fully :
"At the beginning was the Word." The mass of mankind are
justified by mere faith in Christ, without a right understanding
of his godhead ; and as this doctrine was known but by few, and
there were but few writers, metaphysical sophists invaded Chris-
tianity and its injured God.
Calvin found the Apocalypse so unintelligible, that he could
not be persuaded to undertake its interpretation. Servetus, his
opponent, on the contrary, commenced with this book. It
abounded, as he conceived, with astrological prophecies ; but
this notion Calvin strongly combated in a separate treatise. He
points out especially the vision in the twelfth chapter : " The
dragon which would destroy the woman and her offspring is the
pope ; the woman is the church ; her son, whom God delivers,
is the faith of Christians. For 1260 prophetic days or years
must the church remain under antichrist. Then commences the
conflict with the dragon. Michael and his angels conquer, after
that the dragon has murdered many, and the good and wicked
fight upon the earth. This contest is now at an end. The hosts
of Michael are true witnesses of the church. In the time of
Constantine the Great, the dragon began to drive the true church
into the wilderness : Christ ceased to rule from the moment when
the true doctrine respecting him was corrupted, and the divine
essence divided into three persons f"
Servetus was one of those who delight in controversy from the
notion that they are favoured with a particular revelation, and
that God will restore the lost faith in answer to their prayer. It
was well that he retained enough of discretion to avoid supposing
himself, according to his name, the angel Michael. He wrote to
Calvin : " I labour incessantly for the requickening of the church,
and you are indignant with me because I take a part in this con-
flict of Michael, and wish all pious men to follow my example.
Consider well this passage, and you will see that there are men
thus struggling who are ready to sacrifice their lives, in the
* Mosheim, s. 95. " Hac sola fiducia rudis plebs justificabatur, quamvis
Christi divinitatcm non plene cognosceret."
t Christ. Restit. 1. i. de orbis perditione, p. 396.
A.D. 1553 ] CALVIN AND SERVETUS. 179
blood and in the testimony of Christ. That they are called an-
gels is according to the usage of Scripture. The new-birth from
above makes us like the angels. See you not, that the subject
here spoken of is the revivifying of the ruined church ?"
The manuscript of the ' Restitutio ' was sent by Servetus to
Calvin through the bookseller Frellon. He was anxious to see
what the reformer would say respecting it. Some time after he
desired that the manuscript might be returned to enable him to
correct it. Calvin, however, did not send it : it was now in the
hands of Viret at Lausanne. The correspondence extends, with
several intervals, between 1540 and 1548*. It was necessary
for Servetus, as a reformer, to measure his strength with the most
powerful spirit of the protestant party. Calvin was the greatest
obstacle to his plans. His impatience, and the proposed meet-
ing in the early part of his career at Paris, are sufficient indica-
tions of his jealousy towards the reformer. He was anxious to
obtain his answer to the three following questions f : they will
serve to show the materials of which his system consisted : — " Is
the crucified man, Jesus, the Son of God, and on what account
is He so?" There was, therefore, still a doubt on his mind,
although, in the first work, he had professed this faith. " Is the
kingdom of God in men, when they go into this kingdom, —
when they are born again ?" — " Must the baptism of Christ take
place in faith, as the Lord's Supper ; and why did He institute
baptism and the Supper ?"
The most remarkable point in Calvin's answer, which exhibits
the main principles of his theology, is found in the statement,
that faith is necessary to baptism, and is as strength to children.
It is sad to think that Servetus was not satisfied with the solid
answer which Calvin gave. He replied to him with warmth, and
desired an explanation in his second writing, more modest in the
conclusion : " I beseech you, by God," he says, " that as you
promised to add somewhat to your former statement, so you will
now teach me, in the first place, what true faith is." Subse-
quently he spoke of his opponent as a knave ; but his attack on
the Calvinistic view of baptism was not wrongly conceived. He
was unwilling to regard it as distinct from the Lord's Supper.
When he sent several other questions to Calvin, which indicated
* Calvin, in his Tract, p. 517, says, " When he was at Lyons he sent me
three questions to answer. He thought to entrap me. That my answer did
not satisfy him I am not surprised."
t Calv. Refut. Error. Serveti, Ed. Amstel. p. 517- Ed. Gen. p. 600.
N 2
180 CALVIN AND SERVETUS. [CHAP. IV.
an awakened spirit, the reformer, who would rest on nothing but
Scripture, answered him in a friendly manner, but with earnest
remonstrances*.
On the baptism of children, which Calvin defended, we have
the following excellent remark : — C( Should God take them out of
the world before they could be spiritually circumcised, we must
leave them to the secret dispensation of divine grace;" and this
may be regarded as an antidote to all the severity of his system.
To the new questions put by Servetus, he returned no answer.
He needed time, and it sufficed to refer to his ( Institutes/ The
proud Spaniard was so offended at this treatment that he sent a
great number of letters to the reformer, one after the other, con-
taining almost countless accusations and offensive expressions,
which, however, were very patiently endured. Mosheim throws
some doubt on the progress of the affair, as related by Calvin ;
but he regards as genuine the thirty letters, written in a very
calm tone, which Servetus appended to his last work, and sup-
poses that they were really sent to the reformer.
The study of Calvin's character, in respect to these occurrences,
shows him to have been a man of extraordinary observation, even
in little things. In the correspondence of which we have spoken,
he was the slave neither of imagination nor of a cold mechanical
memory. Servetus, on the other hand, was continually guilty of
a want of candour ; was always under the influence of his ima-
gination. He was capable of printing letters never sent to Cal-
vin, and he may have omitted what Calvin calls scurrilous words
and curses, if, as is probable, the letters which were sent to Vienne
are the same as those appended to the ' Restitutio.' Only two
ordinary letters are known, as directed by Calvin to Servetus.
The style of the latter displeased him from the beginning ; but
he was willing to continue the controversy, either in the hope that
he might at length convince him of his error, or because he sought
a suitable antagonist. Certain it is, however, that several smaller
papers were addressed by him to Servetus. Calvin's letter to
Frellon, with his answer to Servetus inclosed, is very character-
istic of both opponents. We give the following extract : —
" Herr Johann ! I would fain satisfy your wish ; not that I
have much hope to effect anything with such a man, but because
I am anxious to try whether any means exist to bring him to a
* " I neither hate you nor despise you, nor do I wish to persecute you ;
but I would be hard as iron when I behold you insulting sound doctrine with
such audacity." — Refut. Error. Serv. Ed. Amstel. p. 521. Ed. Genev. p. 605.
A.D. 1553.] CALVIN AND SERVETUS. 181
right understanding, or whether God may have wrought in him
any change. He has written to me in a very haughty spirit, and
I have desired to humble him a little ; hence I have spoken to
him rather more severely than is my wont. This is all I could
do; and I assure you, that nothing is more necessary for him
than a lecture on humility. True it is, he can only acquire that
grace through the Spirit of God ; but we must lend him what
help we can. If God be so gracious to him and us as to render
this answer profitable to him, I shall have cause to rejoice ; but
if, on the other hand, he continue to pursue his present course,
you will lose your time in urging me to labour for him. I have
other occupations of a more pressing nature, and I shall make it
a matter of conscience not to concern myself any longer about
him, for I have little doubt that he is a Satan, whose end it is to
divert me from other and profitable studies. I entreat you,
therefore, remain content with what has been already done, if
there be no change*."
Calvin entertained a hope that the Holy Spirit might still
effect the conversion of Servetus. He was not yet a castaway
in his eyes, and this shows that the expressions which he used
respecting him to Farel are not to be taken literally.
Frellon's letter to Servetus, sent to him by a trusty messenger,
characterizes his impatience, and his desire to stand on an in-
timate footing with Calvin. When the latter referred him to his
6 Institutions,' he sent the work back to him, accompanied with
some bitter remarks. Calvin's well-known letter to Farel, who
was then at Metz, was dated February 13, 1546. Servetus had
sent him a great mass of his heretical writings. He even ex-
pressed his wish to come to Geneva ; but he required a safe- con-
duct and an invitation. Calvin, however, would lend him no
aid. " Servetus," he says, " wrote to me a short time ago, and
sent a huge volume of his dreamings and pompous triflings
with his letter. I was to find among them wonderful things,
and such as I had never before seen, and if I wished he would
himself come. But I am by no means inclined to be responsible
for him; and if he come I will never allow him, supposing my
influence worth anything, to depart alive f."
This, among a thousand other matters, was but an outbreak
of anger, a threat uttered in passion ; the letter, which was
* Mosheim, s. 89-
t " Sed nolo fidem mcam intei poncre. Nam si vencrit, modo valeat mea
authoritas, vivum exirc nunquam patiar." — MS. Gen.
182 CALVIN AND SERVETUS. [CHAP.IV.
sent the same day to Frellon, containing an expression of hope
that Servetus might still be converted. Calvin had probably
answered his communication, and now spoke of the circumstance
to Farel. His enemies have made the sentence referred to of
vast importance, because they can find no worse cause of accu-
sation against him. They do not perceive that their complaint
is unreasonable, for had Calvin desired the death of Servetus, he
would have encouraged his coming to Geneva. It is incredible
how many fables have been founded on this expression ; to what
ravings even it has given occasion, and that up to the present
day. For us it is a matter of no importance whatever, since
Calvin subsequently acknowledged with all simplicity, that he
considered the death of Servetus necessary.
That the correspondence between Calvin and Servetus had
wholly ceased in the year 1548 appears from the words of the
former to Viret. Not being; able to effect anything with Calvin,
Servetus had attacked that minister. Calvin says respecting
this : " 1 suppose you have read the answer which 1 sent Ser-
vetus; it was my wish to have nothing more to do with this
incurably hard-necked, heretical man, and certainly it was well
to follow in this case the precept of the apostle. But now he
assails you : it will be right for you to consider how far it is
prudent to oppose his folly : he will extort nothing farther from
me."
Finding that Calvin would not answer him, Servetus wrote
several times to the minister Pepin at Geneva, to obtain the re-
turn of his manuscript. He had another in hand, which he sent
with certain alterations to the press. The third letter to Pepin
is preserved: it is a remarkable document, and was adduced
against him, with his other manuscripts, on his trial at Geneva.
" Although," he says, " my letter to Calvin shows plainly that
the force of the law is taken away, I will quote a passage which
will prove to you, still better, how a new order of things has been
introduced through the coming of Christ. That the law has lost
its authority, you will clearly see, if you read the passage to which
I refer. Thus the Prophet Jeremiah, chap, xxxi., teaches, that
the covenant with the fathers, when they went out of Egypt, was
abolished. So also Ezekiel, chap, xvi., and Paul, Heb. viii. It
is not under the influence of this covenant, therefore, that God
now receives us as his people ; but through faith in Jesus Christ,
his beloved Son. Consider well, then, what kind of a Gospel
you have, confounded as it altogether is with the law. Your
A.D. 1553.] CALVIN AND SERVETUS. 183
Gospel is without the One God, without the true faith, without
good works. In the place of the One God, you have a three-
headed Cerberus ; instead of the true faith, you have a set of
unhappy dreamings; and good works you regard as nothing
better than idle fancies. Your belief in Christ is a mere pre-
tence, and without any reality. According to your system, man
is a mere clod, and God a monster with a fettered will. Divine
regeneration by water is unknown to you, or is a mere fable.
You shut man out from the kingdom of God, by making it appear
as a mere invention. Woe, woe, woe to you ! I would fain have
warned you by this last letter, and brought you to a better state
of mind ; but my warnings are ended. It is, perhaps, a vexation
to you that I engage in this struggle on the part of Michael, and
wish you would do the same. Read carefully the passage in the
book of Revelation, and you will see that the discourse therein is
of men, ready to contend, placing their lives in jeopardy, in the
blood, and for the testimony of the Lord. That they are called
angels, is according to the usage of Scripture. See you not also
that allusion is here made to the church of Christ, so long op-
pressed in the wilderness ? Is there not reference made, accord-
ing to what John himself says, to some future event ? Who is
that accuser, who complained of our transgressing the law and
the ordinances ? Before the conflict, he says, there will be ac-
cusations and the seducing of the world. Then shall the con-
flict follow, and the time is near. And who are they who shall
gain the victory over the beast, and who bear not his marks ? I
know it assuredly, that I must die for this thing ; but I am not
on that account troubled in my soul, or because that I, a disci-
ple, shall be like my Master. I am distressed that, through you,
I cannot correct many passages of my writings, which are now
in the hands of Calvin. Farewell, and do not expect any more
letters from me. I shall stand upon my watch-tower, and see
what He will say unto me ; for He will come, and will not tarry."
The date of this letter is not known, but it appears to have been
written when his fanaticism was at the height.
W7e are now approaching the third epoch of his unquiet
course, that in which his passions became engaged in the terri-
ble struggle with the feeling of truth which still lived within
him. He had acquired some little knowledge of his great weak-
ness : the castles in the air, which he had created for himself in
the magic light of his fanatical pride, had sadly vanished, and
nothing was left for him but a fearful reality ; the actual struggle
184 SERVETUS AND THE PRINTERS. [CHAP. IV.
of martyrdom, conducting him through imprisonment, disho-
nour, anguish and the flames. He had nourished the hope that
his first work would make an impression on the reformers.
When they neglected to notice him, he remembered that the
early prophets were taught to listen in silence to what the Spirit
should reveal to those who came after. But when he found all
opposing him, his feelings were embittered, and then followed
his last work, as a hostile manifesto. He had for a long time
been an object of suspicion to the Roman Catholics, but it was
his own unquiet temper only which first exposed him to trouble.
In order to bring his work before the world, he endeavoured,
in the first instance, to have it printed at Basel : in this he
failed. The archbishop himself had brought some printers to
Vienne. William Queroult, the overseer of the press, could be
easily won ; he had been driven out of Geneva, and was Cal-
vhr's enemy. Balthasar Arnoullet, the director, was not very
willing to allow a book to be printed without the license of the
clergy ; but he was influenced by a bribe, and two presses were
set to work in secret. Servetus corrected the proofs. The
printing continued from the Michaelmas of the former year to
the January of 1553. Five bales of copies were sent to Lyons;
as many to Chatillon ; still more to Frankfort ; and others to
Geneva. One of the copies fell into the hands of Calvin.
M. d'Artigny has falsified, in a most unpardonable degree, the
history of the detection of Servetus. He has been convincingly
answered and properly censured by Mosheim. Calvin can have
had no premeditated intention of accusing Servetus. The fol-
lowing statement may be regarded as historically correct.
There lived at Geneva, at the time when the work of which
we are speaking was published, a noble Frenchman of Lyons,
who had left his native country on account of religion. This
was William Trie ; and he had a relation at Lyons named Arneys,
who, as a zealous catholic, was perpetually persuading him to
return to the Romish church. Trie, on the other hand, as anxi-
ously entreated him to come to Geneva. He was well known to
Calvin, and it is probable that the latter, greatly excited at read-
ing the work of Servetus, allowed the expression of his indigna-
tion to escape him in conversation with Trie, and others of his
friends.
On the 26th of February, Trie wrote to Arneys : " I cannot
but wonder at your objecting to me, that we have no church
discipline and order. I see, God be praised, that crimes are
A.D. 1553.] SERVETUS DETECTED. 185
better punished among us than by all your boasted spiritual
tribunals. And, as regards doctrine, although we have more
freedom here, yet we never suffer the name of God to be blas-
phemed, or errors to be diffused without opposing them. I can
give you an example, which, to say the truth, is greatly to your
shame. A heretic is protected among you, who well deserves to
be burnt, wherever he is found. When I speak of heretics, I
here refer to a man whom the Papists, as well as we, condemn ;
for although we differ in many things, we have yet this in com-
mon, that we acknowledge three persons in one God, and be-
lieve that the Son, who is the eternal Logos, was begotten of
the Father before all worlds ; that He has in himself eternal
life, his Holy Spirit. Suppose now, that a man should declare
that the Trinity, in which we believe, is a Cerberus, a hellish
monster, and should heap upon it all imaginable abuse, and make
a mock at all which the ancient fathers have said thereon ; sup-
pose that this were the case, I ask you in what light would such
a man appear among you? How base a thing it is, that they
should be led to death who acknowledge that there is one only
God, and that prayer must be offered to Him in the name of
Jesus Christ*, while such a man as this, who regards Christ as
an idol, who tramples on all the principles of faith, revives all
the absurdities of the old heretics, condemns the baptism of
children, calling it a devilish invention, — should be held in
esteem among you, and treated as if he had done nothing amiss !
The man to whom I refer is a Spaniard or Portuguese, Michael
Servetus by name. This is his proper name ; but he is known
by that of Villeneuve, plays the physician, and has just had a
work printed at Arnoullet's office in Vienne. You say, that the
books, the sole object of which is to persuade men to abide by
the simple doctrine of Scripture, corrupt the world; and yet
you protect under your wings a venomous creature sufficient to
destroy the entire volume of Scripture, and all even which you
regard as Christianity." Trie inclosed in his letter the title, the
register, and the first four leaves of the ' Restitutio/
It is easy to perceive that Trie was embittered by his know-
ledge of the horrible sufferings endured by his evangelical bre-
thren in France ; but it was unreasonable in him to accuse
the catholics of allowing a heretic to live among them, when,
through his assumption of a strange name, he must have been
* The writer here describes the faith of the evangelical reformers.
136 SERVETUS DETECTED. [CHAP. IV.
unknown. It appears surprising to some that he should have
sent the title of the work, whereas it is certain that, at this time,
at Geneva, nothing was less likely to be talked of among the
faithful of that city than the work of Servetus. Calvin's oppo-
nents wish it to be supposed, that Trie begged the title of the
book of him, as if there had been but one copy in Geneva.
People however could have obtained as many copies as they
pleased from Stephanus, for Servetus had glutted the world with
them. Calvin sent a copy to Bullinger. It ought also to silence
opponents, when it is known, that Calvin definitely stated in
the Q Refutatio/ that he was ready to say, that had he accused
him at that time, it would not have been a thing to deny. He
believed indeed that if he had driven him from Geneva by fire
from heaven, he would but have done his duty, for he was the
reformer of the church, not of the congregation of a single city.
It is evident that Servetus, who had managed the affair at Yienne
so secretly, had, notwithstanding, a false friend, through whom
the whole was made known to the Genevese. How otherwise
could Trie have discovered that the work was printed at Vienne,
and by Arnoullet ? Neither the city nor the printer was named
on the title-page, although Calvin immediately recognized the
work as written by Servetus. It is now however understood that
Frellon, a catholic at Lyons, was acquainted with both Calvin
and Servetus, and it is probable that when he found the latter
going too far, he joined the rest against him.
The fate of Servetus was now determined. Arneys, a zealous
catholic, lost no time in placing Trie's letter before Ory, the
judge of heresy at Lyons, where the bloodthirsty cardinal Tour-
non, who had brought the skilful inquisitor above-named out
of Italy, was ready to give ear to any suspicion. Servetus was
instantly summoned before the tribunal at Vienne, and under-
went an examination before Montgiron, the general-lieutenant
of Dauphine. He had found means however in the two hours
whilst he was still at liberty to put aside as many papers as
seemed necessary. Presenting himself without any appearance of
concern before the magistrate, he declared that he was quite will-
ing to open his house to any one who chose to search it, for that
it had always been his wish to be free from every suspicion of
heresy. The magistrates did in fact thoroughly search the house,
but nothing heretical could be discovered. A man influenced
by the Spirit of God would have spoken differently from the
beginning.
A.D. 1553.] SERVETUS EXAMINED. 187
Queroult was subjected on the 17th of March to a long exa-
mination, but being a man of ability he betrayed himself in
nothing. All the people employed in the office were examined,
and asked whether they knew the handwriting of the work, some
leaves of which were placed before them. They all answered in
the negative. A catalogue of the books printed at the office for
the preceding two years was required : no octavo was found men-
tioned. All the assistants and servants in Arnoullet's house,
with their families, were brought before the tribunal, and they
were forbidden, under pain of being punished as heretics, to make
public any of these proceedings. On the following day, Arnoul-
let himself, who had been on a journey, returned; he was im-
mediately summoned before the tribunal. There was nothing
against him, and the magistrates were obliged to declare that
the Spanish physician could not be imprisoned on the evidence
before them.
Ory was called to Vienne : he considered that it was necessary
to refer to the original source of the report, and therefore sum-
moned Arneys to his aid. At the same time he himself wrote to
Trie, and begged him for an entire copy of the work, of which
at present they had only the first pages : among other things he
said, " If sufficient proof could be had, people at Geneva should
soon see that the honour of God and of the faith was cherished in
France, and that they were not so negligent as was imagined."
The book now could have done no good, for Servetus denied that
he was the author. An answer to the above arrived on the 26th
of March.
Trie says to his relation, " When I wrote you the letter which
you have given to those whom I accused of negligence, I did not
suppose that the affair would go so far; my only design was to make
it apparent to you what a fine zeal they must have who call them-
selves pillars of the church, whilst they could suffer such a wretch
among them, and yet persecute so fiercely the poor Christians,
whose whole desire it is to worship God in all simplicity. But
as my private letters have been made public, God grant that
they may at least tend to free Christianity from such filth, yea,
from such a deadly pestilence ! I cannot send the book itself,
but 1 can furnish you with a better means of proving the guilt
of this man, consisting of two dozen written leaves, in which are
portions of his heresy. If his printed work be shown to him,
he can deny that he is the author, but not so with his own hand-
writing. I must however plainly confess to you, that I have had
188 SERVETUS EXAMINED. [CHAP. IV.
great trouble in obtaining from Mr. Calvin what I now send you ;
not that he wishes such a cursed blasphemer to remain un-
punished, but because it seems to him that it is the duty of
one, who bears not the sword of justice, to oppose heresies by
doctrine rather than by such means. But I so wore him with
my importunities, showing that the charge of levity would be cast
upon me if I had not his help, that he at last yielded, and gave
me what you see." Calvin therefore had a right feeling of his
duty, but his consent in this matter is an instance of his wavering
between the principle of the old and that of the new covenant.
Notwithstanding the care with which these proofs were col-
lected, they were not sufficient for the purpose intended. Ser-
vetus at Vienne was called Villeneuve, and the handwriting of a
person was not allowed as decisive evidence in a trial for heresy :
it could also be set aside by an oath. The law required that
Villeneuve should be proved to be the author of the i Restitutio/
and further, that Arnoullet had printed the book at Vienne.
Arneys begged Trie a second time to furnish him with better
evidence. The messenger who brought the letter arrived very
late on the last day of March. Trie answered during the night,
the questions put to him, stating that Servetus apologized in the
last of the letters sent for having taken a strange name ; that his
identity was therefore proved ; and that the manuscript of the
work was at Lausanne, and consequently could not be sent :
" But that you may know that this is not the first time that that
monster has endeavoured to disturb the church, I can inform
you, that twenty-four years ago he was expelled from the first of
the German churches, and if he had been in this place, he would
never have gone out." The writer could not tell how it had be-
come known that Arnoullet was the printer.
Although no clear proofs of their guilt existed, the judges de-
termined that Villeneuve and Arnoullet should be kept in con-
finement, to afford an opportunity for their more formal trial : they
were accordingly both thrown into prison, and in separate places.
Servetus was confined in the royal palace, and treated with re-
spect. Palmier conducted the whole affair ; he sent a messenger
immediately to the chateau Roussillon, about fourteen miles from
Vienne, and where the cardinal Tournon was then residing.
Ory mounted his horse and was speedily at Vienne ; his zeal was
extraordinary. In the afternoon, the magistrates assembled in
the Palace of Justice, and in the chamber where causes of life
and death were decided. The accused appeared : he was required,
A.D. 1553.] SERVETUS EXAMINED. 189
according to custom, to take an oath that he would speak only
the truth : he spoke, alas ! scarcely anything but falsehoods.
Thus he deprived himself of his only proper consolation and
genuine strength. Not as a prophet; not as a servant of the
truth ; not surely as a soldier in the host of Michael, did he now
stand before the tribunal. At every new examination there was
a fresh oath, and another instance of perjury : his weakness
shows the courage and tranquil spirit of the martyrs at Lyons
in a still fairer light.
D'Artigny here relates, from Quintana, the history of Servetus,
according to the report of the trial. In the course of his exa-
mination two leaves of a printed work were placed before him,
with marginal notes, and the superscription " De Baptismo,
c. 1 7 *." This was a chapter of Calvin's i Institutes ;' not of the
c Restitutio,' as Artigny absurdly supposed, that work not being-
divided into chapters. Servetus had, in fact, sent to Calvin a
copy of his own work, accompanied by abusive remarks : to this
book the leaves of which we are speaking had belonged, and in-
fant baptism is one of the subjects rashly treated of in the mar-
ginal annotations. This appears from Calvin's refutation of the
errors of Servetus, in the course of which he accuses him of
having vilified several of his books.
The judges only wished for some explanation of these notes.
Servetus was so imprudent as to give it, and thus to show that
he was the author ; after however having done so he expressed
a doubt wThether it was his writing. With regard to the doctrine
of baptism, he retracted his opinion, spoke in the most orthodox
manner, and submitted himself in all things to the church, as
his holy motherf. It is easy to see that his only object was to
save his life.
When, at his second examination, he observed that all his
letters to Calvin were in the hands of the judges, his courage
entirely forsook him; he saw that the affair must terminate
badly, and, in this necessity, he could invent no means of deliver-
ance but an insipid lie. " My lords," he said, his eyes streaming
with tears, " I will confess the truth. Twenty-five years ago3
when I was in Germany, a book by one Servetus, a Spaniard,
was printed at Aganon (Hagenau) ; 1 know not whence he came ;
but at that time I was in correspondence with Calvin, and he
* These leaves were out of Calvin's ' Institutes.' Mosheim (Neue Nachr.
s. 50, 65) has not clearly represented this matter.
f D'Artigny, t. ii. p. 105.
190 ESCAPE OF SERVETUS. [dlAP. IV.
addressed me as Servetus, for there was a similarity in our ap-
pearance, and I assumed his character." For ten years however,
he added, he had ceased to write; and he declared, before God
and the judges, that he had never desired to do aught against the
church, or to dogmatize, in any way, against the Christian re-
ligion*.
There must have been something very comical in such a lame
and absurd account as this, when addressed to a tribunal for the
examination of heretics, and at the head of which was the Italian
Ory. In his confusion, he stated, that the letters were written
to Calvin in Germany twenty-five years back ; while a little after
he asserted that they were sent when he was in France. Several
letters were shown to him, in which he distinctly expressed his
heretical notions : he did not deny that the letters were his ; but
he argued that they only contained the opinions which he held
in former times, and which he had by no means permanently
embraced. When the examination was continued, in the after-
noon, fourteen other letters were laid before him : he still gave
the same answer, stating, " that he did not profess what was
heretical in those letters, but only what his judges and the church
believed to be right."
Servetus had been allowed considerable freedom, and he em-
ployed the present opportunity of getting together some money,
and preparing all things for his flight. It is evident that he had
friends in the place. The archbishop himself was not yet ac-
quainted with his dangerous book, and his blasphemies. He had
been permitted to retain in the prison a gold chain worth twenty
ducats, which he wore about his neck, and six gold rings on
his fingers. At Geneva ninety-seven gold pieces were still found
in his purse. Happily for him, a garden extended up to the
room of the prison in which he was placed : it was possible to
get from this up the roof of a neighbouring house, and thence
along a wall, down which a man could let himself into the court
of che palace. When once there, it was no difficult matter to
reach the city gate, and the bridge over the Rhone.
The prisoners were allowed to walk about the garden, and to
enter it at any time they found necessary. Early in the morning
of the 7th of April Servetus dressed himself completely, but
threw a large night-gown over his other clothes, put a silk hand-
kerchief about his head, and asked the keeper of the prison for
the key of the garden. The man having no fear of his escaping
* D'Artigny, t. ii. p. 108. See also Mosheim, Neue'Nachrichten, s. 9G-100.
A.D. 1553.] SENTENCE ON SERVETUS. 191
in such a dress, immediately gave him the key, and went uncon-
cerned with his people to tend some vines. Servetus, who had
beforehand carefully examined the place, reached the court of the
palace without interruption, and passed the bridge. It was not
till after many hours that the absence of the prisoner was dis-
covered. A terrible tumult followed. The gates were closed,
and all the houses were searched, but the fortunate Servetus
was free. After three days, a countrywoman confessed she had
seen him go.
This was a rare event in the history of trials for heresy. The
process was continued as if Servetus had been present : at length
the judge discovered that the e Restitutio ' had been secretly
printed at Vienne: he exposed all the errors which it contained.
The civil magistrate pronounced judgement before the end of the
examination : the ecclesiastical judges did not finish their pro-
ceedings till after six months had elapsed, and when Servetus
had already been long condemned at Geneva : they declared him
to be an arch-heretic*. Independent of his blasphemy, the ex-
pressions which he employs in his works against the catholic
church, are as powerful as those of Luther and Calvinf.
The temporal power condemned Servetus to be burnt to death,
and he was to be burnt in effigy in the interval between his sen-
tence and apprehension. Arnoullet, who proved his innocence,
as having been deceived, was set free. Queroult had assured
him that the f Restitutio ' was altogether a harmless book. The
latter probably fled, and succeeded in making his escape. The
copies of the i Restitutio ' were to be destroyed J.
It was on the 1 7th of June that the sentence of death was
pronounced, and on the same clay the executioner conveyed the
effigy of Servetus, with five bales of books, on a cart, from the
palace to the market-place, and thence to the " Place Charneve: "
there he hung the effigy on a gallows, and afterwards threw it
into the fire, in which it was slowly consumed. The property
* Mosheim, Neue Nachrichtcn, s. 100, 101.
f For example, " O Christe Jesu, Fili Dei, liberator clementissime, qui
toties populum ab angustiis liberasti, libera nos miseros ab hac Babylonica
Antichrist! captivitate, ab hypocrisi ejus, tyrannide et idolatria! "
J The impression consisted of a thousand copies. Of these, a part had been
sent to Lyons, another to Chatillon, and a third direct to Frankfort. Ar-
noullet took care that the copies sent to Chatillon, for the fair, should be burnt.
Calvin wrote to the ministers at Frankfort not to spare a copy (Epis. 153). Of
those which came to Geneva, one was tied to the body of Servetus when he
was burnt: the others were also destroyed. Mosheim shows that only six
copies escaped. Robert Stephanus was' the man pius et integer of whom
Calvin speaks in his letter, and who destroyed the copies at Geneva.
192 SERVETUS AT GENEVA. [CHAP. IV.
which Servetus had acquired was so considerable, that a noble-
man purchased it of the king for his son.
Servetus had determined upon going to Naples, and there
practising as a physician : his way led him through Switzerland,
fear of pursuers preventing him from passing over Piedmont.
He wandered for about a month in France*, and then went
quietly to Geneva. A homeless man, impelled by a peculiar fate,
he had no sooner escaped from the tire than he rushed into new
danger. An extraordinary delight in running hazards was one
of his characteristics. He knew that Trie had sent his letters to
Vienne ; that Calvin could give him no safe-conduct ; that he was,
on the contrary, his accuser; but notwithstanding all this, a
strange irresistible power drove him to Geneva. He had many
years before been led, in the same manner, to seek Calvin in
Paris ; subsequently he forced him into a correspondence, and
now at last he came himself, in order to observe in secret this man
whom he at the same time both sought and shunned. Calvin
had reason to remark, " I know not what to say of him, except
that he was seized by a fatal madness to precipitate himself
upon destruction/'
In the middle of the month of July, a man was seen, on foot,
entering the gate of the old city ; he turned into a little inn used
by strangers, called the Auberge de la Rose, and situated on the
lake. The night before he had slept in the village of Le Louy-
set, where he arrived on horseback. It was easy to recognize in
the traveller a man of education ; in the southern expression of
his eye, there was deep thought and dreaming phantasy, and
somewhat of passionate excitement: he indulged in some light
expressions. The people of the inn wishing to learn more about
him, asked if he was married ; he answered, that a man could
find women enough without marrying. Some one observed him
going to the church where Calvin preached.
After remaining about a month at Geneva, he resolved on
making a journey to Zurich. For this purpose he engaged a
boat to carry him across the lake ; but just as he was on the
point of departing an officer appeared, and took him prisoner in
the name of the council t« This event occurred August 13, 1553.
* According to Calvin's letter to Sulzer, for four months (Ep. 156) ; but
this is not correct. His sentence was pronounced at Vienne June 17th, and
Calvin learnt, August 13th, that he was in Geneva.
f See Beza's preface to Calvin's Commentary on Joshua, Bibl. Raisonn.
Angl. t. ii. pt. 1. p. 95. Moshcim, s. 152.
A.D. 1553.] APPREHENSION OF SERVETUS. 193
Calvin assumed to himself great credit for having rendered
such service to God, to the church, and to mankind, by depriving
a blasphemer like Servetus of his power to do harm, and exciting
him to recant : he often spoke on this subject*, and repeated, that
it was his duty to inform the council that Servetus was living in
the republic.
Servetus appears to have kept himself quiet at Geneva : he.
had probably friends or acquaintances in that city ; it would
otherwise be inconceivable how his presence there should have
become known. Some persons relate that he was recognized in
the church ; at his examination he stated that no one could have
a right to apprehend him in Geneva ; he had not attempted to
promote his reformation in that city, nor was it his intention to
remain there. Musculus however said, in a letter to Bullinger,
that Servetus was only wishing to make use of the bad feelings
of some great men at Geneva against Calvin, in order to obtain
a position whence he might be able to agitate other churches t.
This may have entered into the plan of the libertine party.
Servetus was conveyed to prison, — the old prison near the
church of St. Peter : he complained bitterly of this in his letter
to the council. Nicolas de la Fontaine J, a student, and Calvin's
secretary, allowed himself to be named the accuser of the pri-
soner, and with a full knowledge of the rule established at Geneva,
that if the accused was found innocent, the accuser should suffer
the punishment which would otherwise have fallen on the cri-
minal. The council was at this period altogether opposed to
Calvin, but it regarded his accusation of Servetus with great ap-
probation §. The latter had been long considered as an outlaw.
Calvin had no intention to expose Servetus to capital punish-
ment ; he only wished to render him harmless, to make him re-
cant his blasphemy, and so preserve Christianity from injury ;
but we shall see how the Spaniard opposed himself by his mis-
chievous, obstinate spirit to all the representations of reason, and
* To Sulzer, Sept. 9, Ep. 156. Ed. Amst. p. 70.
t Grotius is altogether wrong in his statement that Servetus went to Geneva
to consult Calvin.
t Born at St. Gervais : he fled to Geneva, where Calvin protected him, and
made him cook to the Sieur de Bourgogne, when that nobleman lived in his
house. He next became Calvin's secretary, and manifested great aptitude for
the sciences: he had already lived bix years with Calvin at the time when
vetuswas apprehended, and had advanced far in theological knowledge; thus
he was no longer a menial, nor was he unworthy, as enemies pretend, of the
part which he undertook. He is called by Spoil itudiant en theologie. He
styles himself p-oposant, and Calvin his pastor.
$ "Magno assertsu piorum," Says Beza, in writing to Bullinger, Aug. 27, 1553.
VOL. II. O
194 EXAMINATION OF SERVETUS. [CHAP. IV.
thereby excited most men of Christian feeling against him. Cal-
vin's well-known expression to Farel, hastily uttered, as has been
remarked, was but an outbreak of anger : it purported, that if
Servctus persevered in his blasphemy he must certainly die, if
Calvin's authority had any weight in Geneva. This view is sup-
ported by the words, "Add, that no danger of any great punish-
ment hung over him, if he could possibly have been brought to
his senses*." All that Calvin required was a recantation. Thus
he sorrowfully exclaimed, at a later period, " Would that we
could have obtained a recantation from Servetus, as we did from
Gentilis ! "
But notwithstanding this, he still firmly asserted the principle,
that obstinate heretics, who throw all things into confusion, must
be punished with death. The conduct of the council towards
Servetus is easily understood, when it is recollected, what was the
then state of affairs, and how involved the very existence of the
civil polity was with that of the church. If the latter sunk, so
must the former ; if the evangelical faith ceased to prevail, the
catholic must be restored, and with it the bishop. It was for
this the catholics wrere looking, and nence the state could never
be indifferent to the propagation of heresy. Nor should it be
passed over, that the old ordinances of the emperors against
heretics, those particularly of Frederic II., were still in force
in Geneva, as in the rest of the Christian world. According to
these, heretics were placed in the same rank, with regard to
guilt and punishment, as traitors.
Nicolas de la Fontaine was required to state to the council the
points of accusation, as drawn up by Calvin : he appeared the
next day before the tribunal, and formally denounced Servetus
as a heretic. Calvin relates the circumstance in his letters f, and
mentions, that he had selected forty points of accusation (there
are only thirty-eight J), adding characteristically, and as if
freeing himself from the heat of his passion, " that he thought
Servetus would be punished with death ;" that is, if nothing could
be done with him. But still he was unwilling to think for a
moment of his dying in the flames.
In reference to the first thirty-six articles, which regarded his
doctrine, Servetus answered with candour and serenity* that he
* Refut. p. 517. Opusc. Fr. p. 15:52.
t Ed. Laus. Ep. 152. Ed. Amstel. p. 70, a. " Nicolaus nieus ad capitate
judicium, poena; talionis se offerens, ipsum vocavit."
t See Trechsel.
A.D. 1553.] EXAMINATION OF SERVETUS. 195
acknowledged himself the author of the works named, spoke of
his desire to be instructed, and then defended himself with great
simplicity, asserting that he had not intended to blaspheme, and
that he was ready to recant*. It was immediately objected to
him, that he had said, in the seventh article, " Such a division
in the being of God makes him into a tripartite God ; that is, into
a devil with three heads, like Cerberus, which the old poets have
called a hell-hound, a monster." There were other blasphemies
of a similar kind.
He did not deny this, but declared that he believed in the
Trinity ; only that by the term person he understood something
different from what was meant by modern teachers. Since how-
ever he practically adhered to the blasphemy involved in the
expression, the whole weight of the accusation continued to rest
upon him. To the complaint, that he had defamed by means
of his book, and through the person of Calvin, the religion of
the city, casting all possible insults upon it, he replied, that
" Calvin having formerly abused him in many of his books, he
had answered him, and shown that he erred in many respects,
and was inebriated in his opinions." When his book was placed
before him, he observed that that manuscript had been sent six
years before to Calvin, for his consideration ; that it had not
been printed, and still needed a thorough revision. The work
' De Trinitatis Erroribus ' was not brought forward, there being
no copy of it in Geneva : this appears from a letter written by
Viret to Calvin f.
In the second and subsequent examinations, when it was well
seen that Fontaine was in nowise equal to the task of confront-
ing such a man, all the ministers were requested to appear. The
enemies of Calvin, the leaders of the libertine party, Perrini and
Wandel, were also present. Fontaine desired to be excused.
Calvin now at length stood face to face with his adversary : all
the points of accusation were again brought forward, and Calvin
argued so powerfully and correctly, that he led Servetus to con-
clusions which sounded like madness, but of which, as deduc-
tions from his principles, there could be no doubt. The pan-
theistic tendency of his ideas led necessarily to such conse-
quences.
In his letter to Farel, August 20th J, Calvin says, "I will not
* Trechsel, p. 285. t Trechsel, p. 228.
+ Ep. 152. Ed. Amstel. p. 70, 1553. The following expression occurs in
this epistle : " Spero capitale saltern fore judicium, poena? vero atrocitatera
o 2
196 EXAMINATION OF sERVETUS. [CHAP. IV.
speak of the rashness of the man ; but his frenzy was such that he
did not hesitate to say, that the divinity dwells even in devils ;
that there are actually many gods in each, because the godhead is
essentially communicated to them, as it is to wood and to stones/'
He speaks also of the same subject, and more fully, in the ( Re-
futation: "When he asserted that all creatures were produced
from the proper essence of God, and that therefore all were filled
with gods, when he blushed not to express his thoughts both
in writing and by word of mouth, I was so hurt by this wretched
absurdity, that I assailed him with these words : ( What, un-
happy man ! if any one treading upon this floor should say to
you, that he was treading your God under his feet, would you
not be scandalized at such an assertion ? ' He answered, c I, on
the contrary, do not doubt but that this footstool, or anything
else which you may point out, is the substance of God.' When
it was again objected to him, 6 Then will the devil actually be
God ? ' he answered, with a peal of laughter, c And can you doubt
it ? This hott ever is my general principle, that out of the sub-
stance of God all things have arisen, and that the nature of
things is actually the Spirit of God f.9" These words are not
in the original account of the trial : it is possible that the reporter
may have omitted them from a feeling of piety ; all who were
present heard them.
These men, both powerful in their way, no longer exercised
moderation. Servetus believed Calvin to be his personal enemy,
which he in reality was not, and he consequently resigned him-
self to the force of his southern temperament ; whereupon Calvin,
according to his own confession, answered him as he deserved.
Irrational heat, abuse and blasphemy, so disgusted the people,
that at the end of the second examination, the judges decided
that Servetus appeared to them well-deserving of punishment.
It may be added, that reports were daily brought of the murder
of holy confessors in France, Italy and Spain ; so that it might
seem ridiculous to let such a man as Servetus live. In times of
wild excitement like those described, we have rather to wonder
at the sedateness of his judges.
Calvin was right when, in his strong argumentation with Ser-
vetus, he said, that he threatened to overthrow all religion ; for
while, in his fanatical notions, he thought to restore Christianity to
remitti cupio,"— I hope that the sentence will at least be a capital one, but
J wish that the severity of the punishment may be remitted.
* )\ 522. t Refut. Error, p. 522.
A.D. 1553.] EXAMINATION OF SERVETUS. 197
its apostolic form, it was very evident that his doctrine was alto-
gether opposed to the primitive belief. So also, whether the
received doctrines were true or not, he ought never to have
spoken of them as he did, to render them ridiculous in the eyes
of the people. It could not be denied that he was endeavouring
to introduce something entirely novel, but which he desired
both catholics and protestants to receive as the only truth. To
treat them with insult because they would not do so was the part
of a rash and obstinate man, intolerant against all the world.
But his love of blasphemy was the most deserving of condemna-
tion ; and if his ridicule of holy things, from which, as if it be-
longed to his system, he never ceased, even to the last, be excused
by some as the mere result of humour, this may be taken as a
sign that they are themselves indifferent to all religion. If, in
the present day, a teacher should heap similar abuse on the faith
of the people in the sacrament, a similar expression of indignation
would be the consequence : he would be restrained, according to
the laws now existing, and would lose his freedom. From the
same principle, in past times, Servetus could not fail to lose
his life. The Old Testament commanded that the blasphemer
should be punished with death, as we still punish murder, and
Servetus found his peculiar delight in laughing at that which is
hoi v.
Fontaine was let out of prison, and Anton, Calvin's brother,
became bail for him. Servetus was kept under stricter guard :
Calvin assailed him with great severity from the pulpit. It was
necessary to make the people acquainted with the real opinions
of the Spaniard, and to resist the operations of the libertine
party, who were busy with their plans. But it is laughable to
hear the enemies of Calvin assert, that he increased the severity
of the prisoner's treatment. In the first place, it was not his
business to superintend the prison; and in the next, Servetus
had pens, ink and paper, and Calvin lent him, out of his own
library, whatever books he desired.
The libertine party now began to mix themselves up with the
affair : they inspired the prisoner with false hopes, and advised
him to attack Calvin with all the power he could. This only
rendered the judges more indignant against him. Calvin, on his
own part, remained unmoved by passion, although it was he, in
fact, who had to bear the whole burden of the proceeding : he
expressed himself, in his correspondence, in the most tranquil
manner respecting Servetus. Letters, both of an earlier and
198 EXAMINATION OF SERVETUS. [CHAP. IV.
later date, exist, which show that other things moved him far
more than this process.
Servetus was again frequently examined. The sentence passed
upon him by CEcolampadius, twenty years before, was cited.
Passages were quoted from the c Common Places ' of Melanc-
thon, in which that writer complains of his sporting with the
idea of person, and calls him a fanatic, a deceitful and godless
man. Servetus replied, that the judgements thus passed upon
him were not the sentence of a magistrate. According to Cal-
vin, he answered, that Capito and CEcolampadius had been of
his opinion, and that he wondered at their having changed.
Another accusation was urged, and one which shows the spirit
of the age ; namely, that he had vilified Moses by asserting that
his account of the fruitfulness of the promised land was false.
The passage indicates that in the older times certain free-thinkers
endeavoured to introduce a different interpretation to that ac-
knowledged by the church. But here there does not appear to
have been any blasphemy intended. God is not mentioned ; and
if it be said, that the beauty of the promised land was extrava-
gantly and falsely praised, it is a matter of wonder how a writer
could be so foolish as not to see, that Palestine might formerly
have been very lovely, while in later times it might be unfruitful.
But as Servetus persisted in defending his position, and accused
Moses of employing a vain boast, an insult seemed directed
against Scripture. The remark which had been made was not
scientifically critical ; and if due weight be given to the known
rashness of its author's character, it will be evident that he de-
lighted in throwing ridicule on the inspiration and credibility of
Moses. Thus to the accusation, founded on the above circum-
stance, he replied at first, with perfect confidence, " that he had
not written the words imputed to him/5 When Calvin pressed
him hard upon the point he said, " that it was not honest in-
deed to publish the work of another under his name." He was
too petulant to prove the truth step by step, and he asserted
that, even were he the author of the passage referred to, there
was nothing wicked therein. Wiping his mouth, he added, " Let
us proceed/' Calvin answered him by the most weighty argu-
ments*.
It appears that the proceedings were carried on partially in
public. Calvin observes, in regard to the circumstance above
* Op. Fr. p. 1550.
A.D. 1553.] EXAMINATION OF SERVETUS. 199
mentioned, " That which I relate would seem incredible, if our
gracious senators, and many men of importance, had not been
present/'
Servetus found himself in a still more perilous condition when
his exposition of the Bible was brought forward : this afforded
fresh evidence of his impiety. The passages chiefly objected to
were selected from the 7th, 8th, and 53rd chapters of Isaiah.
His principles of interpretation have been already alluded to : he
insisted that these portions of the Old Testament had both an
historical and a mystic-prophetic sense. The 53rd chapter ought
to be understood, he said, of Cyrus in the first instance, but as
also containing a prophecy of Christ. Calvin however proved,
with impressive eloquence, without assailing the principle ad-
vanced by Servetus, that he was endeavouring, by the false inter-
pretation of this chapter, to shake the foundation of Christian
faith. Servetus, in fact, did not understand the doctrine of the
Atonement, or how it was related to his system, and he may
possibly have intended to tread this grand principle in the dust.
Calvin accused him of such a wish*. " Possessed by a mad and
devilish lust, he would rather overwhelm himself, shameless as
he is, with guilt, than not destroy all." Servetus replied, that
Nicolaus of Lyra interpreted these places of Scripture as he did.
Calvin desired that the commentary of Lyra might be referred to.
This being done, he convinced him that he was altogether wrong.
" But," says Calvin, " he manifested no shame at this ; for it was
his common custom to cite authors whom he had never read."
This afforded a ready introduction to the attack upon his he-
resy, in respect to fundamental points, and in reference to infant
baptism, which he disallowed, — a great offence at that time; the
anabaptists having combined man}r other errors with this part of
their system, and being in all countries punished with death.
When the subject of the Trinity was introduced, he called it a
dream of St. Augustine, and those who believed in the doctrine,
Tr it heists. The judges treated the other matters as of compara-
tively little importance, but insisted strongly on the two of which
they had now to speak. Servetus declared that he was only
anxious to revive the original doctrine with respect to God ; that
he himself believed in the Trinity (this was not honestlv said),
and that he only called those Tritheists and Atheists who parted
the unity of God. The term person, he added, signifies a visible
manifestation of God ; and he did not condemn those who adopt
* Refut. Error, p 522, b.
2C0 EXAMINATION OF SERVBTUS. [CHAP. IV.
a certain distinction of persons, but those only who make a real
distinction in the being of God. In the same manner, he stated
that he had not called the real Trinity a hell-hound, but the false
only. Thus also he defended himself against the complaint that
he had spoken wickedly of the Son of God, and had stated that
he was only so called because he consisted of the three elements
of the Father, fire, air, and water. On the contrary, he asserted
"that he believed in the eternal godhead of Jesus Christ, who
was begotten from eternity, but conceived in time, by the Holy
Ghost, in the womb of the virgin."
That he here threw a cloak over his real doctrine is certain.
Pantheistic and Platonic notions lay at the root of his system :
Calvin endeavoured to prove this to him. It was also deduced
from his principles, that he denied the immortality of man : on
this point he defended himself with more success than on the
others, in regard to which he depended only upon subterfuges.
When all the several articles of accusation had been summed
up, he was desired to state his belief on the peculiar being of
God, and on the origin of things. This was very hard for him
to do ; for, according to his notion, all things were not created,
but flowed from the being of God, so that He is everywhere
present. He had already asserted that God's essence is in all
things, but now he wished to modify his statement, and said that
" God is necessarily present by his attribute of omnipresence :
things are not parts of God ; but the original images, the ideas
or forms of all things, are in Him."
The dangerous question respecting infant baptism was next
considered. This was more likely to be a source of destruction
to him than any of the others on which he was examined. The
Genevese council viewed him, in respect to this subject, not only
as an enemy of the faith, but as the enemy of all social order.
It was thus that the anabaptists were everywhere regarded.
Striking and vehement were the declarations of Servetus.
" Infant baptism," he asserted, "was nowhere commanded; it
was an invention of the devil. No one could commit mortal sin
before his twentieth year, and it was not till then that he required
redemption. Till children could understand the mystery of re-
demption, their sins could not be imputed to them, and an early
baptism was therefore useless. He was willing however to be
taught, if he was wrong."
But Calvin could not convince him of his error. This was a
proof of the earnestness with which he adhered to his opinions,
A.D. 1553.] EXAMINATION OF SERVETUS. 20l
and how superior he now was to the weakness which he had
exhibited at Vienne. The last accusation against him was, that
he had vilified Calvin, and, in him, the Genevese church. This
was founded on the letter in which he denounced woe to those
who preached so evil a doctrine.
At the end of the examination he stated, that he had sent a
part of the edition of the ' Restitutio/ through Arnoullet, to
Frankfort. It was on the information thus received that Calvin
wrote so earnestly to the ministers of that city*.
The judges announced, on the fourteenth day, that the accu-
sations brought against Servetus were proved, Colladon declaring,
that the evidence had been found sufficient for that purpose.
According to custom, the whole affair was now to be referred to
the chief procurator, whose office it was to continue the prose-
cution of the accused, in conformity with the law.
I now proceed to the account of another examination, which
took place four days after the last, because Servetus had expressed
his belief, that he had stated in his work the doctrine of the pri-
mitive church. During the intervening four days Calvin pre-
pared himself for the approaching struggle. On the 21st of
August, Servetus again stood before the council with his accusers.
Calvin had not arrived : the vacant time was employed in show-
ing Servetus a letter in which Arnoullet directed the bookseller
Vertet, at Chatillon, to burn all the books of the Spaniard found
in Frankfort. He had been deceived, he said, through Queroult,
who proposed to translate the work into French, and he had no
knowledge whatever of the heretical nature of its contents.
Calvin now entered, with the ministers. The dispute which
was to be decided, and by such opponents, could not fail to be
interesting in the highest degree to theologians. A little mis-
understanding occurred at the beginning. Calvin sought to prove
that the holy Trias was acknowledged by Ignatius, Poly carp,
Irenaeus, and Tertullian, before the Nicene council, in the same
sense as by the later fathers. When Justin was mentioned, and
Calvin, holding the book in his hand, illustrated his argument
from its pages, Servetus requested a Latin translation. Calvin
answered that there was none. Servetus, the editor of several
learned works, made no apology for this, his insufficient know-
ledge of Greek, strange as the circumstance must have seemed.
In the argument which ensued, it was Calvin's object to show,
that the word vTroaTacris is to be found in the ancient writers, as
* Ed. Laus. Ep. 153, Amst. p. fl : August 27, 1553.
202 EXAMINATION OF SERVETUS. [CHAP. IV.
in Tertullian : they therefore acknowledged an actual distinction
in the divine essence. Servetus, on the other hand, sought to
prove, that these writers only intended to speak of a visible ma-
nifestation of Deity. The war of words here became so fierce,
that the reformer, whom Servetus loaded with unmeasured abuse,
mindful of his dignity, considered it prudent to leave his seat.
He retired, with all the ministers.
Servetus remained alone on the arena. He expressed his
wish to buy several books ; many even of those which Calvin
had brought with him into the hall : this was readily allowed
him. He took Irenaeus, Tertullian, Ignatius, and a fourth book,
in order to draw up his defence.
A petition, which he presented on the 24th of August, re-
mained unnoticed. He prayed therein to be allowed to go free.
According to the practice, he said, of the primitive church, here-
sies were never judged by the civil power, but by the church
itself, which banished the offender. Nor could he, he added, be
lawfully punished, seeing that he had committed no offence in
the territory of Geneva, and was altogether opposed to the
course taken by the anabaptists. Lastly, he desired the aid of
legal advisers. But, in the meantime, the examination com-
menced on the 23rd of August was continued. The chief pro-
curator had laid thirty questions before the accused. Servetus,
who now discovered the great danger of his position, prayed
imploringly to be liberated. His answers however were given
quietly, because perhaps his chief antagonist was not present.
He excused the publication of his works on the plea of his good
intentions. By the restoration of Christianity, he meant the
establishment of true doctrine. He did not believe, he now
said, that the churches of Geneva and Germany were on the
way to destruction : his strong expressions had reference only
to scholastic disputes. If he had erred on the subject of infant
baptism, he was ready to recant. To the accusation that he had
used the Koran, he answered, that this book had been printed
at Basel*, and with the letters of the Zurich ministers. He had
only desired to tread in the paths of the ancient doctors of the
church.
At the examination held on the 28th of August, the business
was well nigh brought to a close f. The judge-advocate proved,
that the grounds on which Servetus had founded his petition
* He referred to Bibliander's edition of the old version by Peter, abbot of
Cliigny. See Trechsel, p. 235. t See Trechsel, p. 303.
A.D. 1553.] .SENTENCE ON SERVETUS. 203
could not be allowed. He adduced the laws of the church,
which required that heretics should be punished, wherever they
might be found ; and he was sure, he added, that the prisoner's
own conscience would condemn him to death, if he honestly
consulted it. There was no doubt of his agreement with the
anabaptists, and justice forbad that an advocate should be ac-
corded to such deceivers*.
For the rest, Servetus had gained in fortitude and prudence.
Though he still sought some subterfuge by which to escape, it
was now that the grace of God began to move his heart, and to
prepare him for death. It is probable that he found support in
prayer. At this examination, in which sentence was pronounced
upon him, he no longer asked for mercy, but declared that
he would abide by his convictions. He continued, in all his
speeches, to express himself with fearful violence against Cal-
vin f, and the chief-procurator was now the most active in the
business. Calvin however was intimately associated with Col-
ladon, and was himself a lawyer. The judicial sentence, as has
been remarked, is also in the hand of one of Calvin's amanu-
enses ; so that it might be imagined, that this last document was
even drawn up by Calvin. But a nearer examination of the
instrument will show the improbability of this notion : it is
full of confusion, and is altogether deficient in argument. The
writer passes from doctrine to law, and refers again and again
to the life of Servetus, a method altogether contrary to the clear
style of Calvin. He appears therefore at most to have been
only aware that the document was being drawn up.
The three points advanced by the accused in his petition
were rejected, and it was announced to him that the law, with
which he was well acquainted, condemned him as a heretic J.
Thirty- eight new questions were now proposed. In an additional
examination, at which Calvin was present, Servetus defended
his assertion, that the ancient church did not punish heretics.
He also apologized for what he had said against the ministers of
the reformed doctrine, and justified the statement which he
had made as to his agreement with Capito and CEcolampadius.
Further, he declared that he was ready to alter his opinions, if
he could be shown by Scripture that they were wrong. He
therefore desired that opportunity might be allowed him, either
* Bibl. Angl. ii. p. 14 2.
t Thus he called him, "Simo Magus, impostor, sycophanta, ridiculusmus,
cacoda:mon, homicida." + Trechsel, p. 236, 237 • Processacten, p. 307-
204 SENTENCE ON SERVETUS. [CHAP. IV.
to prove the truth of his doctrine, or to recant. This would
have been to repeat the whole process from the beginning.
In the midst of these proceedings, that is, on the 31st of
August, the superintendent of the Palace of Justice at Vienne,
in which Servetus had been confined, presented himself, with a
petition, that the escaped heretic might be delivered again into
his hands, so that they might execute the sentence passed upon
him at Vienne. Servetus was led forth, and the superintendent
having been called in, the former was asked if he knew him.
He answered in the affirmative, adding, that he was two days
under his guard, and had been twice examined. The council
wisely decided that it must be left to the choice of Servetus
himself to which tribunal he would submit. He now threw
himself upon his knees, and prayed, with a flood of tears, the
magistrates of Geneva to continue his judges, and to do with him
what they would. He again ascribed his sufferings to the per-
sonal hatred of Calvin. But he made, on this occasion, a noble,
penitent confession. Lamenting his hypocrisy, he acknowledged
that he had written fiercely against the Mass, whilst he con-
tinued to partake of it among the catholics. " I sinned," he
said, " but the dread of death urged me to it." The superin-
tendent departed, after obtaining from Servetus a declaration,
that the gaoler was not privy to his escape. All this took place
in the month of August. On the 1st of September another
messenger arrived. He brought a letter from the Sieur de
Maugiron, to whose son the king had sold the property of the
prisoner. This gentleman requested Servetus to name all the
persons indebted to him ; but Servetus was unwilling to do
this, lest he might thereby throw several poor persons into diffi-
culty. The council approved of his conduct in this respect.
On the same day Calvin, accompanied by the ministers, ap-
peared again before the council, and Servetus was especially
admonished to honour the truth. When Calvin, who had col-
lected all the objectionable passages in the writings of the
accused, began to make the experiment of inducing him to
recant, he answered, that inward care prevented him now from
considering these things ; and he laid it down as a principle,
that matters of faith were not to be debated before a civil tri-
bunal, but only before one appointed for that purpose. Nor
was it very convenient, he added, to handle questions of this
kind in a prison.
Calvin declared, in reply, that he should very willingly carry
A.D. 1553.] SENTENCE ON SERVETUS. 205
on the dispute in the church, and before the people, for he de-
fended that which was right ; but it was not contrary to the
law to discuss such things before a civil tribunal. According to
the code of the emperor Justinian, which was still in force,
heretics were to be treated as malefactors. Servetus therefore,
he asserted, suffered no injustice in being brought before the
present court, in which also the church was represented by its
ministers, engaged to convert him.
Servetus answered, that, in the time of Justinian, the church
had already lost its original innocence and purity ; and further,
that the church of Geneva could not rightly judge him, Calvin,
his enemy, being its very life and soul. He submitted himself
solemnly to the churches abroad. But he could not make this
appeal with any degree of consistency : he had claimed supe-
riority to both catholics and protestants. Had he retained his
lofty pretensions, therefore, he must have insisted on being tried
by a council of all the various churches of Christendom. Calvin
was quite ready to consent, that the opinions of other churches
should be collected, as in early times ; but he and Servetus
could not agree on the starting-point. They were therefore
obliged to separate ; and the council, which was influenced by
a spirit of moderation, determined that, to avoid excitement,
Calvin and Servetus should carry on their dispute in writing.
The former was to make extracts, in Latin, from the writings
of Servetus, for the use of the Swiss ; and Servetus was to
answer in Latin, and by writing. An indefinite time was allowed
him, so that he might retract what he found wrong, and could
rectify any perversion of his meaning. The papers, on both
sides, should afterwards be forwarded to the Swiss churches, and
await their judgement.
The magistrates now expressed their wish, with marked
thoughtfulness and caution, that the business might be submitted
to the decision of a spiritual tribunal. Calvin spent fourteen
days on his new labour. He probably did not require so long a
period ; a single evening would have been sufficient for the work ;
but he wished to give Servetus time to collect and tranquillize
himself. But whatever was attempted for his good, served only
to injure him. lie lost all patience. In a petition which he
addressed to the council, he stated that he had been now five
months in prison, that he still desired the aid of an advocate,
and that he wished his cause to be brought before the Council of
206 CALVIN AND SERVETUS. [CHAP. IV.
Two Hundred, to which he would submit himself. He added,
that he would bring a counter-accusation against Calvin.
In this useless and unmeaning petition, he very distinctly
retracted his appeal to a spiritual tribunal, because the civil
power was incompetent to determine matters of faith. He fell
at once from his lofty height into the dust. His present course
could have been dictated by no prudent counsellor ; he must
have adopted it from the suggestion of the party opposed to
Calvin. Amied Perrini, the soul of that party, had a majority
in the Council of Two Hundred, and made use of Servetus to
overcome Calvin, whose position at that time wTas very uncer-
tain. Servetus knew nothing of the constitution of the Genevese
republic, but his appeal indicated a thorough knowledge of its
institutions on the part of his adviser. The council rejected his
petition, but ordered that he should be better treated in prison.
That he wras urged forward by the enemies of Calvin appears
evident from a letter of the reformer to Farel, in which he relates,
that Perrini had appeared in the council for Servetus, and de-
manded that the business should be brought before the " Two
Hundred." Advice was also given the accused to ingratiate
himself with the libertine party, and to heap abuse on Calvin*.
It was at this period that the attempts of that faction were made to
set aside the right of excommunication and the rules of discipline.
Two letters were interchanged between them. Calvin pro-
duced thirty-eight points, distinctly heretical, without any addi-
tion or remark ; they were derived exclusively from the last
work of Servetus. The objections therefore to the inspiration
of the Mosaic Scriptures, and those which respected the inter-
pretation of the Bible, were no longer the question ; but there
were the most horrible blasphemies against the fundamental
principles of divine truth, against the person of Christ, the
Holy Spirit, immortality, and infant baptism.
Servetus replied to Calvin's accusation : " He had assumed
to himself a species of Sorbonne authority, without understand-
ing what was meant. His simple object was to show, that when
Christ is called in Scripture the Son of God, this is always as
the man Christ. The second person in the godhead is called a
person, because a personal exhibition of the man Jesus had
already taken place, hypostatically, in God, and this might be
proved by numberless passages from the old fathers."
* Bibl. Angl. ii. p. 161. Ruchat, vi. p. 36.
A.D. 1553.] CALVIN AND SERVETUS. 207
This statement is followed by an expression of immoderate
hatred against Calvin. The writer reminded him, that the rash-
ness of a man was deserving of all wonder, who dare assert himself
to be a true believer, when he was in reality a disciple of Simon
Magus, as he, Servetus, had manifestly shown in his Apology*.
" Who will say/* he asked, " that a criminal accuser and a mur-
derer can be a servant of the church ? " He now repeated, in
few words, haughtily, and with intense contempt of his anta-
gonist, " Thou art a pitiful wretch, if thou continuest to condemn
things which thou understandest not. Art thou not ashamed to
assert so much and without reason ? Thinkest thou to deceive the
ears of the judges, simply and solely through thy howling ? Thou
hast a dull perception, and canst not comprehend the truth.
Wretch ! thou knowest not the reason of things. Wretch ! disci-
ple of Simon Magus ! thou art altogether ignorant, and desirest
to make us wood and stone by thy notion of fate. Thou art
only dreaming with the sorcerer/*
The accusations brought against himself, Servetus treated
with the greatest indifference, as if it did not really concern him
to attempt a justification of his conduct, or as if he had no idea
of the good intentions of the council, of the rights and sanctity
of the church, of the state of affairs in general, or of his own.
It was only as a reply to the clergy that this hateful docu-
ment was received. The council, weary of the matter, gave the
ministers but two days in which to consider it. Servetus sent
their answer back with great contempt, and accompanied by
malicious and wrathful marginal notes. It was like the raving
of a madman. To the first accusation, Calvin fairly answered,
that it was simply in obedience to the command of the council,
against which Servetus made no complaint, that he had selected
the passages exhibiting his principal errors. He had performed
this task with all honesty f.
Calvin shows, in the next place, that it was the object of
Servetus to prove, that Christ, the Word, was not in God, and
begotten from eternity ; and that he had loaded those who
receive this truth with every species of abuse. He then assails
the error of Servetus, and shows that he fully comprehended his
meaning, and that Christ is not simply ideally, but really in
God.
This development of Calvin's doctrine is accompanied with
many reproaches against his antagonist. The passages adduced
* Apologia, 674, 701. f Refut. Error, p. 528, b.
208 CALVIN AND SERVETUS. [CHAP. IV.
by Servetus in defence of his system are employed in confuting
it. He is called a heretic and a monster. " The Clemens," it is
said, " whom he quotes, was written by a foolish monk. He
avoids those places which prove the contrary of what he asserts.
Thus he has altogether forgotten to cite Ignatius, because that
father would testify against him. Proceeding with his abuse,
he has called Calvin a murderer, to show probably how
skilled he is in this species of insult*. He repeats a hundred
times such expressions as these in his marginal notes : " Thou
dreamest : thou liest." Here we read : " Well, well, thou disci-
ple of Simon Magus, if thou deny that thou art an assassin, I
will prove it to thee by thine own conduct. Thou darest not
deny that thou art Simon the magician, whoever may believe
and think that thou art a good tree. I adhere to this righteous
cause, and fear not death j\" This is followed by a full con-
futation of the errors advanced by Servetus, with the just re-
mark, that, whereas he had continually spoken of the doctrine
of the Trinity with contempt, he now pretended to acknowledge
a distinction of persons, and to view it as threefold. The obser-
vation made by Mosheim on this subject will excite surprise :
he considers that Calvin must have opposed Servetus on new
grounds, in order to win him to his opinion. But the reformer
saw well enough that he could do little with this perverse man,
who had already heard so often that which he had to say. Cal-
vin was justified in observing, when speaking on the subject of
infant baptism, that it did not become any one who pretended
to the slightest degree of gentleness or candour to rave as Ser-
vetus did, and call infant baptism a scandal, " a detestable abo-
mination." " We do not doubt," Calvin had observed, " but
that God upholds all things by his power ; but it does not follow
from this position, that there is an essential Deity in ail things :
still less can it be argued, that the floor on which we tread is
a part of the godhead, and that all the devils are full of the divine
essence, as Servetus asserted at his examination."
In answer to this, the latter remarked, " That is all one.
Thou hast heard from Irenaeus and others, that * being,' or ' sub-
stance,' is that which supports us. But moving thy foot, thou
deuiest that it is moved in God. Thus thou wouldst move in
Satan. We on the contrary assert, that we move in God, in
whom we live ; and thou, though a devil, must also move in him."
* Refut. Error, p. 527, b.
t Refut. Error, p. 528, a. b. and p. 533, a. Opusc. Fr. pp. 15G7 and 1582.
A.D. 1553.] CALVIN AND SERVETUS. 209
And further: " I would fain make a list of thine errors. He
who is not Simon Magus is, according to Calvin, a Pelagian.
The whole body of Christians, consequently, are condemned by
him ; even the apostles, and the disciples of the apostles, and
the doctors of the church; for none of them rejected free-will, as
this sorcerer has done. Thou liest, thou liest, thou liest, thou
most wicked, wretched monster ! "
Servetus also objected to Calvin, that he condemned astrology,
while he was ignorant of its nature : " So great is thy impudence
that thou judgest of things of which thou knowest nothing, for
thy science extendeth not beyond thy grammar*. I am not
confuted by Scripture: I stand alone; but Christ is my de-
fender f."
To this document Servetus added a letter to the council, in
which he apologized for his marginal notes ; and another to
Calvin, as if it had been the proper time to accuse him of not
being acquainted with philosophy and the natural sciences. "All
action takes place through contact; God, consequently, must be
in everything in order to give it movement." And further : " No
one dare now assert that the law of Moses is still in force."
The frantic passion which Servetus thus exhibited estranged
all parties, and wholly deprived him of their respect. They
had expected a sensible answer to the accusations of his oppo-
nents. No further reply was given to what he had written.
The clearest proofs now existed that his obstinate spirit was
wrought upon by malicious feeling. He might have been left
to the enjoyment of his own convictions, but he was bound ta
respect and suffer the belief of his antagonists ; and he ought,
at least, to have expressed regret at having so unreasonably
troubled and scandalized worthy and simple Christians, yen,
even the entire church.
Calvin says, in reference to what took place before the coun-
cil, and when freedom was given him to dispute : " I stood be-
fore him humbly and patiently, as if I myself had been the
prisoner. I was present to bear testimony to the truth of my
doctrine. He took every opportunity to abuse me roundly ; so
much so, that the judges were shocked at his conduct; but I
restrained myself from repaying him as he deserved. He would
not, indeed, have been in danger of any severe punishment, if he
had only conducted himself with moderation, and had afforded
any hope of his repenting. But so far was he from this, that,
* Refut. Error, ed. Amst. p. 537. Op. Fr. 1595. f Moshcim, s. 199-
VOL. II. p
210 JUDGEMENT OF THE SWISS ON SERVETUS. [CHAP. IV.
full of wrath and boasting, he utterly rejected all sound and use-
ful admonition. Let it not be said that it was a laudable firm-
ness which induced him to persevere in his confession ; for at
Vienne he was ready to deny it all, merely to save his life/5
It is certainly remarkable, that Servetus now exhibited such an
unbending firmness ; nor can wc say whether it was the conse-
quence of his hatred to Calvin, a fanatical love of his own errors,
or of a false security, nourished by the encouragement of the
libertine party.
On the 21st of September the interchanged papers were sent
with the c Restitutio5 to the churches of Zurich, Bern, Basel,
and Schaffhausen. The council requested their opinion on the
affair. Calvin had already, on the 7th of the same month, made
Bullinger acquainted with the whole of the proceedings*.
That eminent man was the chief promoter of the pacific sen-
timents, which led to the good understanding existing between
the churches of Switzerland, and that of Geneva. At his en-
treaty, Haller wrote from Bern to Sulzer in Basel. As an illus-
tration of the feeling with which the best men in the country
regarded the punishment of heretics, it must be remarked, that
Farel opposed Calvin, and advocated putting them to death by
fire. In this he agreed with the otherwise benevolent Bullinger,
and both exhorted Calvin to be firm and severe. Thus Farel
says to him : " It will be a wonder if that man suffering death,
should, at the time, earnestly turn to the Lord, dying only one
death, whereas he has deserved to die many thousand times ; and
a wonder it will be, if he should endeavour to edify those present,
— he who has sought to destroy so many of those who are already
gone, of those who now live, or are still to be born. Adversaries
of Christ, and true enemies of the church, will the judges be, if
they do not show themselves moved by the horrible blasphemies
of this godless heretic, who has so assailed the divine majesty,
and laboured to undermine the Word of God, and to destroy the
churches. But I do hope that the Lord will so order it, that
they who are praised for their righteous sentences on robbers,
and on those guilty of sacrilege, will so act, that they will, in tins
case also, obtain a good report, by putting to death a man who
has so long persevered in his heresy, and has involved so many
others in misery. If it be thy wish to lighten the horror of the
punishment due to such an offender, then wilt thou be acting as
a friend towards thy bitterest enemy. But I beseech thee not
* MS. Gen. 7 Idus Sept. 1553. i. p. 95.
A.D. 1553.] SERVETUS AND THE LIBERTIES. 211
to act so as to encourage others to introduce new doctrines among
the people, and to hope that they may pursue, uninterruptedly,
the same course as Servetus."
Bullinger wrote : " The Lord has given this Spaniard into the
hands of your senate. If the council, therefore, assign to this
wretch the punishment due to his crimes, the whole world will
see that the Genevese hate blasphemers ; that they will pursue
obstinate heretics with the sword of righteousness, and will
avenge the honour of the divine majesty. If, on the contrary,
they delay to do this, thou must not neglect the congregation :
were you to do so many other evils would arise. Pursue thy course
then, unterrified. Trust in God, through Christ. Beseech Him
to give thee counsel and help, that He may deliver thee from this
peril. We will aid thee with our prayers/'
Calvin had written, in the mean time, to the minister Sulzer,
at Basel, where the Genevese had many enemies, Castellio
among the rest, in order to make him acquainted with the whole
business*.
During the progress of this correspondence, the affair at Ge-
neva was quietly drawing towards its conclusion. Servetus, as
we have stated, had allowed himself to be tempted, by the ene-
mies of Calvin, to assail the reformer as a mortal enemy ; as a
false accuser, an unworthy servant of God ; as a foe to Christ,
and a heretic. He even desired to see him banished the land ;
the proper punishment, according to his view, of heretics. This
was the anxious wish of the libertines ; and could it have been
effected, Servetus wTould then have taken his place as a reformer
in Geneva, and have destroyed its church.
The accusation which Servetus brought against Calvin may
appear an absurdity ; but it must be observed, that the party by
which he was led, was now ready to venture alt to accomplish
some important purpose. The most senseless part of the com-
plaint is that which accuses Calvin of sorcery, and the proposal
to deprive him of his property, it being well known that he pos-
sessed' none.
Servetus could certainly not effect his purpose by means so
ridiculous as these. The council, which was firm and prudent,
refused to receive the complaint, and transferred it to the ordi-
nary "Acts." Servetus then besought an audience; but this
was also refused. He now sent a brief letter of remonstrance,
complaining of his painful position. This was on the 10th of
* Calv. Epist. 156. Ed. Arast. p. 70, Sept. 9, 1553.
p2
212 SERVETUS AND THE COUNCIL. [CHAP, IV.
October. Calvin in the mean time informed his friends, that
the hostile party was earnestly engaged in its tumultuous oppo-
sition to the church ; and that he wished that Farel and Yiret
were with him at so important a juncture. His position had
never been more dangerous. It is characteristic of his nature,
that, at a period like this, he could take part in the minutest
affairs which were interesting to others. Thus he communicated
to his friend the news of the marriage of one of their acquaint-
ances*. That the affair of Servetus would have a very serious
termination he states as a thing evident of itself. The Swiss
clergy had already, that is, at the beginning of October, come to
a decision on the subject. It was soon commonly reported that
their sentence was adverse to Servetus. Some voices were im-
mediately raised in his favour. An anabaptist, David Georgii,
or Joristj who, under the name of Johann von Briick, had found
refuge at Basel, and was beloved and honoured in the reformed
church, seems to have regarded Servetus as a brother, because of
his views on baptism. Excited by personal considerations against
intolerance, he wrote, but without naming himself, to the Swiss
communities, exhorting them to oppose the clergy. " It is an
incredible blindness," he said, "that the servants of Christ, who
arc sent to give life to the dead through the knowledge of the
truth, should condemn the erring to death, and through tempo-
ral death expose their souls to eternal ruin. The right to pass
such a sentence belongs to Him alone who gave life, and suffered
death for our redemption. Were it lawful to put heretics to
death, there would be a general slaughter, for all religious par-
tics regard their opponents as guilty of heresy. If Servetus
(whom he calls good and pious) be a heretic, he ought to be ad-
monished in a friendly manner, and then banished the state.
The Lord himself will slay all false teachers with the breath of
his mouth, and not with the sword. The tares must be left to
grow up with the wheat, and await the judgement which will
take place at the end of the world."
An Italian lawyer, Gribaldof, at Geneva, also made a similar
appeal for Servetus ; but it came too late.
The authorities at Zurich did not take long to consider the
subject. They received the writings from Geneva on the 28th
of September, and on the 2nd of October they replied, that,
* MS. Gen. Oct. 14, 1553. f See Mosheim.
I The error of Servetus respecting Christ, a9 the Son of God, in his human
nature only, greatly pleased Gribaldo. (Trechsel, p. 254.)
A.D. 1553.] JUDGEMENT OF THE SWISS ON SERVETUS. 213
" According to the advice of their ministers, they now admo-
nished the Genevese to exercise such severity, that the wicked
and deceitful intentions of their prisoner might not be accom-
plished, for that his doctrines were totally contrary to the Chris-
tian religion, and gave great scandal and offence*/' The mi-
nisters of Zurich agreed with Calvin throughout ; and though
they would not determine respecting the punishment to be in-
flicted on the prisoner, they readily united in exhorting the Ge-
nevese to exercise great severity, and added a prayer, that the
Lord might give them wisdom.
From SchafFhauscn the council wrote, that it had consulted
with the clergy, and now forwarded their letter to Geneva. These
ministers went farther than those of Zurich. " We doubt not,"
they say, " that you will frustrate, according to your great wis-
dom, the designs of Servetus, and prevent his blasphemies from
feeding, like a scorpion, on the members of Christ. But if you
were only to resist his mad inventions with long argumentation,
this would be merely to rave with the raving f." This is one of
the strongest expressions used on the occasion.
The senate at Basel still recollected the controversy which
Servetus] carried on with G^colampadius : they laid the papers
before the clergy. " All the old heresies," said the latter, " are
revived by Servetus. With regard to himself, you must employ
all diligence to convert him : it is by this means only that you
can allay the agitation which he has excited. If however he
be incurable, and continue hardened in his wickedness, he must
be chastised according to the power given you by the Lord, and
as it will be your duty to proceed, so that he may be prevented
from bringing further shame upon the church, lest the last state
should be worse than the first J."
In a letter to Farel§, Calvin, having briefly announced the
end of the process, characterizes the brethren of Zurich as om-
nium veliementissimi, because they expressed themselves so
sternly on the atrocity of the Spaniard's impiety ; and those of
Basel as cordati. The letter from the Bernese (on whom he
passes no judgement) and that of their council also arrived :
" Our friends," says Calvin, u were greatly moved thereby."
The Bernese ministers, although they condemned Servetus,
* Bibl. Angl. 1717, Art. 7, p. 163. t Ep. 158. Ed. Amst. p. 74.
J Ed. Laus. Ep. IGO. Ed. Amst. p. 72. § Ep. 161.
214 LAST HOURS OF SERVETUS. [CHAP, V.
expressed themselves in conclusion as follows*: "We pray the
Lord that He may lend you the spirit of wisdom and power,
that you may thereby drive this pest from your church and from
other communities, and at the same time may do nothing which
can seem unworthy of Christian magistrates." But the general
language of the document was strong and severe, and the coun-
cil of Geneva felt itself confirmed in the zeal which it had dis-
played. On a former occasion, the Bernese had advocated tole-
rance. Intone of Haller's letters to Bullingert it is said, that
the Bernese magistrates, when they learnt the opinion of the
ministers on Servetus, were so excited, that they would have
burnt him on the spot. The blasphemies which he had uttered
terrified them, and they feared for the peace of the land. "We
must swallow," they said, "what the Genevese have prepared
for us in the way of agitation." In the letter of the Bernese
council to the Genevese it is said, " We pray you, doubting not
that such is your desire, to use a firm hand, that sects and here-
sies, whether those now spoken of, or others like them, may
not be planted in the church of Christ, our only Saviour ; and
that so you may avoid trouble and adversity, and effectually ad-
vance his glory {."
CHAPTER V.
SERVETUS CONDEMNED TO DEATH. HIS LAST HOURS IN
PRISON. HIS EXECUTION. AN INQUIRY INTO THE CIR-
CUMSTANCES ATTENDING IT. REVIEW OF HIS DOC-
TRINES.
Although the Swiss had not distinctly stated their opinion as
to the death which Servetus ought to suffer, it is evident that
they wished his death. The ministers of Zurich and Basel
prayed that the Genevese might be endowed with wisdom.
WThat they meant by this is very clear, when we recollect the
condemnation of Gentilis at Bern, and the burning of the bones
* Ep. 163. Ed. Amst. p. 73. f See Mosheim in Neue Nachr.
+ See Schellhorn, who, in Actis Historico-Ecclesiasticis Saeculi xv. et xvi.
p. 217, has given a document, which the Bernese ministers laid before the
council, on the subject of Servetus.
A.D. 155.3.] LAST HOURS OF SERVETUS. 215
of Joris at Basel. All expressed their desire that Servctus might
no longer be allowed to disturb either the Genevese, or any other
community. This was in fact to pronounce his doom. Banish-
ment would merely have transferred the heretic to some other
church. They seem to have been only prevented by Christian
horror from writing down what they meant. No idea was likely
to be entertained of perpetual imprisonment, when capital pu-
nishment was the order of the day. Still, that by fire is not
mentioned. Calvin says, " All, with one mouth, declared, that
Servetus has renewed those impious errors by which Satan, in
early times, disturbed the church; and that he is a monster not
to be endured."
However, therefore, the clergy might hesitate, they yet gene-
rally inclined to severity*. It is also to be borne in mind, that
the Swiss Confessions imposed it as a duty on the civil magi-
strate to punish blasphemers with the sword f.
The proceedings had now reached their last stage. It was not
lawful for the lesser council to pronounce sentence of death, with-
out having previously conferred with that of " The Sixty," and
obtained a majority of votes J. The discussions of the council
lasted three days. Opinions were greatly divided. Some of the
members advocated perpetual banishment ; others perpetual im-
prisonment ; but the greater number were in favour of capital
punishment. But of what kind? The majority determined upon
that by fire, according to the old law, unless the prisoner should
recant.
It may have been owing to the difficulty of coming to any con-
clusion, in the agitated assembly of a republic, that the council
would not, or could not, afterwards alter the decision at which
it had once arrived. It was now that Perrini represented him-
self, for four days, sick. He, and other enemies of the church
party, weakly retreated, when they ought to have come most
boldly forward. In a letter of Calvin to Bullinger§ he says,
" What will become of the man I know not: as far as I can un-
derstand, sentence will be pronounced tomorrow, and executed
the day after." It was not till the last day, that the council re ■
solved upon condemning the prisoner to die by fire.
* We must, on this point, agree with Arraand de la Chapelle against
Mosheim.
f " Magistrates stringat Dei gladium in omnes biasphemos." Conf. Ilelv.
cap. xxx.
I Bibl. Raisonne, t. ii. pt. i. p. 105.
§ Ed. Laus. Ep. 1G2. Ed. Amst. p. 78, Oct. 25.
216 LAST HOURS OF SERVETUS. [CHAP. V.
Perrini now appeared ; but it was too late : he made an at-
tempt, but it was fruitless. " Our play-house Caesar/' says
Calvin*, "after pretending a three-days' sickness, presented him-
self at length in the council, to save this malefactor from pu-
nishment. He did not blush to express his wish that the whole
business should be transferred to the c Two Hundred.' But
Scrvctus has been condemned, without dispute ; and will, to-
morrow, be led to execution." The lesser council, it appears,
was unanimous.
As soon as Calvin heard that the assembly, in its zeal, had
gone too far, he called the ministers together ; and they, with
one voice, besought the council to soften the mode of execution.
Another colour, in fact, had been given to the whole proceeding,
by dooming the culprit to the flames. Calvin had already said
to Farel, " I think he will be condemned to die ; but I wish that
what is horrible in the punishment may be spared himt." We
have seen the answer of Farel, who was altogether of another
opinion. Calvin now wrote to him, u We have endeavoured to
change the mode of execution, but without avail : I will tell you,
by word of mouth, why we could do nothing J." Farel received
no more information by letter : he had come suddenly to Geneva.
The last hours of Servetus were the best in his life : his im-
provement began with his misfortunes ; as if the Spirit of the
Lord had found the way to his heart, through sorrow and the
expectation of death, and had thus rapidly developed his capa-
bility of good. He was now about forty-four years of age ; but
during the short period of his imprisonment at Vienne, his mind
had advanced more rapidly than during the whole of his earlier
career. This was most conspicuously the case at the last. It
is certain, however, that he still failed in acquiring a thorough
knowledge of himself.
We find that it was his blasphemy, his rash jesting with holy
things, — the insult with which he had treated the majesty of God,
which weighed heaviest upon him§. The judges passed over
everything else ; such as his supposed pantheism, his rejecting
the prophecies of Isaiah, and his doubts respecting the spi-
rituality of the soul. Instead of insisting on these things, they
confined their attention to that which he had said on the person
of Christ, without plunging into the depths of speculation. That
* Ed. Laus. Ep. 161. Ed. Amst. p. 71, to Farel, Oct. 26.
f Ed. Laus. Ep. 152, Aug. 20. Ed. Amst. p. 70.
X Ed. Laue. Ep. 161. Ed. Amst. p. 71. § Beza, Vita Calv.
A.D. 1553.] LAST HOURS OF SERVETUS. 21?
however which all regarded with the greatest horror was his
blasphemy : his insult of the majesty of God was viewed alike
by all. Calvin in his last admonition, and Farel in his address,
at the place of execution, and also in his letter to Blaarer, insist
on this ; and here the offender still remained unbending as iron.
He could not be induced to ask for forgiveness, or to retract his
infamous expressions. Hence it was that he could not die tran-
quilly ; and that all future generations will lift up the stone against
him,
We would fain pass with him these last two days of his unhappy
life. He regarded it as a matter of conscience not to think, for
a moment, of retracting ; and this creates a certain degree of
interest in his favour. The gaoler opened the door of the prison ;
the officers of justice entered, and read to him the sentence,
Ci that he was on the following morning to be burnt alive, and
his body consumed to ashes." He remained dumb for a mo-
ment,* as if a thunderbolt had struck him. Then, after deep
sighs which resounded through the hall in which he was seated,
groans and howlings followed, like those of a madman*. At last
he cried, " Have mercy, have mercy !" A true martyr would
now have found strength to praise God for giving him so glo-
rious an opportunity of bearing testimony to the faith. How
differently did the five confessors at Lyons, like numberless
others of the same spirit, walk to the place of execution, singing
as they went the ninth Psalm ! The only appearance of dignity
which Servetus manifested was when, ceasing to rave, he sud-
denly mastered himself, and expressed a general repentance.
We have no record how he spent the night, but the next day
he was calmer. It was the 27th of October, an autumnal day
in that beautiful country, where the neighbouring hills are often
seen covered with snow, while the valley still glows with the
richest tints of the season, the glaciers of Savoy rising majes-
tically in their glittering vest above all. The words of Servetus
indicated, on this day, a mingling of Christian feeling with his
depraved notions, and a sentiment which, in relation to his
enemy, had something in it noble. When the heart bears such
fruit, as reconciliation with enemies, an earnest desire to pray
for forgiveness, and a certain trust in God, there appears to be
some truth in its sentiments, even though its convictions may
want the clearness given by the Spirit.
The excellent Farel was with the prisoner by seven o'clock in
* Op. Fr. p. 1552. Calv. Refut. Error. Serv. p. 523.
218 EXECUTION OF SERVETUS. [CHAP. V«
the morning : this was in conformity with the express wish of
Calvin, who desired him to accompany the wretched man to the
place of execution. The Genevese ministers who had borne
witness against him could not well perform this duty. Farel
has left us an account of the proceedings*. This holy man
easily inspired confidence, and Servetus could have desired no
better companion on his last journey, to him so terrible. Even
to us it seems as if a heavy weight were about our feet. We
feel with what different eyes the unhappy Servetus must have
surveyed the heavens, and the surrounding landscape as he ap-
proached the place of execution, and as he prepared to leave a
world which he had been accustomed to look at in the splendour
of his imaginary reformation.
Farel, who was intent upon leading his soul to the true faith,
began again to speak of his errors, and then passed to the sub-
ject of Christian love. He besought him " to repent of his sins,
and to confess the God who had thrice revealed himself." But
the unhappy man persevered in his original statement, and
required that it should be proved to him from Scripture, that
Christ was called the Son of God before he became man. Farel
answered him, but he could not be convinced of his error : he
had nothing to reply, but remained impenetrable and obstinate.
The struggle was long-continued, and the hour of execution drew
near. Farel, therefore, and some ministers from the country
who were then present, warned him, that if he would die as a
Christian, he must be reconciled to Calvin, whom he had treated
so unjustly. Servetus consented. Calvin was sent for, and
appeared accompanied by two members of the council, probably
on the supposition that the prisoner might still retract.
Servetus received Calvin tranquilly. The solemnity of the
hour of death had sharpened his conscience, and tamed his pride
and wrath* Calvin himself has described these last moments :
u When one of the members of the council asked him what he
wished with me, he answered, that he desired to ask my for-
giveness. I readily answered, and it was strictly the truth, that
I had never sought to resent any personal affront received from
him. I also tenderly reminded him, that sixteen 3rears before,
I had diligently sought, at the hourly peril of my own life, to win
him to the Lord; that it was not my fault that all pious people had
* In a letter to Blaarer (Blaurer). An extract only of this letter is given in
Hottingcr, s. 803 ; and in lluchat, t. vi. p. 51. The document was commu-
nicated literally, to the author, by Orelli, the librarian at Zurich.
A.D. 1553.] EXECUTION OF SERVETUS. 219
not extended the hand of friendship towards him, and that this
would have been the case, had he but shown some degree of
judgement ; that although he had taken to flight, I had still con-
tinued to correspond peaceably with him ; that, in a word, no
duty of kindness had been neglected on my part, till, embittered
by my free and candid warnings, he had resigned himself not
merely to a feeling of anger, but to absolute wrath against me.
Turning however from that which concerned myself, I prayed
him to implore the forgiveness of God, whom he had so awfully
blasphemed, seeking to annihilate the threefold personality,
and calling it a three-headed hell-hound, whenever mention was
made of a distinction between Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. I
besought him to seek the pardon of the Son of God, whom he
had dishonoured by his heresies, denying that Christ, by the
human nature which He had taken, had become like us ; and
thus destroying the band of brotherly union between us and
the Saviour, and our only hope of deliverance.55 But Servetus
gave him no answer. Calvin continues : " When I found that
I could effect nothing by my arguments and persuasions, I
would not attempt to be wiser than the precept of the Master.
I withdrew from the presence of a man who had sinned as a
heretic, and was condemned of himself. Titus, iii. 10, 11*."
And thus Calvin and Servetus parted.
As soon as Calvin was gone, Servetus continued his prepa-
ration, with prayer and supplication. He said once, in confi-
dence, to Farel, that he had learnt much from a man who had
no little name. " But I know/5 says Farel, w that he both
thought and wrote in after-times very differently. I do not
doubt, however, but that he had been not a little harmed by the
Rabbinical writings ; of which Erasmus somewhere says, that
such impious productions ought to be avoided, or read With
great caution, to prevent their poisonous influence.55 Farel says
further : " A few hours before his execution he struck his breast,
and cried aloud to God, aloud to Christ, praying for forgiveness,
and acknowledging Jesus as his Reedemer.5' But Farel adds,
that when he had declared the necessity of punishment for
heresy, " the unhappy man could not be brought to confess, in
truth, that Christ was the eternal Son of God, but only that He
was the Son of God, because God had miraculously created
* Calvin describes the scene in the prison. Refut. Error. Serv. p. 511.
They spoke in French, and the very words are reported in the Opusc. Fr.
p. 1508.
220 EXECUTION OF SERVETUS. [CHAP. V.
Him in the. womb of the Virgin." Farel calls him, repeatedly,
miser and infelix, a proof that his impressions respecting him
were very distressing.
The council continued assembled throughout the morning,
either in the hope that he might retract, or to pronounce its
final judgement upon him. Servetus was led before it, and the
staff was broken over him. The sentence was next read. The
unhappy prisoner cast himself at the feet of the magistrate*,
and this at the moment when a martyr would have raised victo-
riously his eyes to heaven. He prayed that they might put him
to death with the sword, lest by great pain he might be driven
to despair, and so lose his soul. If he had sinned, he said, he
had done so through want of knowledge, for it had been his will
and his aim to promote the glory of God.
Servetus did not seem to feel the humiliating nature of his
entreaty. Farel however interrupted him, and said, that he
must first acknowledge his wickedness ; and that then he might
ask for mercy. Servetus answered, " that he suffered inno-
cently ; that he was led to death as a sacrifice ; but that he
prayed God to forgive his accusers."
Farel regarded these words as insulting in the mouth of so
wretched a criminal, thus pretending to play the martyr. He
addressed him, therefore, with severity ; threatened to leave him
to the judgement of God, if he continued thus to speak; said
that he had hoped that he would edify the people, and would
entreat them to pray for him. It was only with this thought
that he had been induced to accompany him to the last, Ser-
vetus was silent, and made no further appeal.
But Farel, who had a tender heart, was deeply moved, and,
addressing the council, he earnestly implored it to soften the
punishment, although originally, as we have seen, he was in
favour of the burning. The members of the council, however,
were so horrified at the wickedness of Servetus, that they re-
mained inflexible, and answered, that a sentence so passed could
not be altered.
We now behold Servetus feebly descending the steps of the
senate-house ; not passing out by the present door, but by the
old gate, the modern fortifications not then existing. We follow
his last steps to the Place Champel, where already so many
malefactors had breathed their last in the flames. He prayed
as he went along, both with Farel and with the others, who
* This is stated in the old history, de Morte Serveti.
A.D. 1553.} EXECUTION OF SERVETUS. 221
walked not far from him. Many times he cried aloiul, a God,
deliver my soul ! Jesus, Son of the eternal God, have mercy
upon me \" In vain was he entreated to call upon the Saviour
as the eternal Son of God.
They were now arrived at the place, where all was prepared
for the execution, and a large multitude of people assembled.
A wide-stretching eminence about two miles from the city, and
originally belonging to the bishops, is still known by the name
of Champel, or Champey. The road to it lies through the pre-
sent Porte Neave, and the friendly, shady path, called the Tour
des Philosophes, lies to the right. From the top of Champel
the view extends, on the one side along the valley, surrounded
by vineyards, and to the woody amphitheatre of the Jura moun-
tains ; on the other, the eye traces the course of the Arve, rush-
ing along with many windings, and pouring at last its snow-
grey waters into the clear bright stream of the Rhone. In the
distance may be seen the Fort de l'Ecluse, where the Rhone
disappears ; and on the Savoy side, the two Saleves, the Mole,
and the Voirons, which here cover the glaciers of Savoy. On
the opposite side of the Arve lies the little town of Carouge. A
pleasant villa, surrounded by gardens, now crowns the summit
of Champel ; but in the lower part of the eminence, where the
old place of execution was, an excavation is still found, effected
by the removal of the gravel, called " Le Creux du Bourrcau*."
Servetus beheld, as he approached this place, a stake,
with a huge heap of oak-wood and leaves in a circle. At the
sight of these preparations he cast himself on the ground, and
prayed awhile in silence. During this interval, Farel addressed
the surrounding multitude. "You see," he said, "what power
Satan has at command, when he once gets possession of a man.
Here is one, learned above most others, and who, perhaps, be-
lieved that he was acting right. He is now, however, possessed
by the devil ; which might happen also to any of you."
Servetus rose, and Farel encouraged him to speak some few
words ; but he sighed deeply from his wounded, struggling soul,
" O God ! O God I" Farel asked, " Hast thou nothing else to
say?" "What can I do else," was the answer, " but speak of
God ?" Farel, who did not know what relations he might have,
inquired if he had a wife, or children, and added, that if he
wished to make any will, a lawyer was present. He made no
answer. When Farel, however, asked whether he would not
* Keysslcr's Reisen, b. i. s. 149.
222 EXECUTION OF SERVETUS. jiCHAP. V.
desire the people to pray for him, he yielded to the suggestion,
and begged the bystanders to remember him in their prayers.
Fare! now repeated his former entreaties, and besought him to
call upon Christ as the Son of God. This he would not do ; but
he made no more mention of his doctrine ; and Farel regarded
this as providential. " Satan," he says, " was hindered from
again spitting out his blasphemies."
When Servetus was now led to the pile, Farel exhorted the
people to pray for the wretched man ; and to entreat the Lord
to have mercy on his lost soul, and to turn him from his cursed
errors to sound doctrine*.
The executioner employed by the Genevese was not so well-
skilled in his work as others. The wood which had been piled
up was fresh oak, still in leaf. There was a stake, and before it
a block, upon which Servetus was to seat himself. His feet
hung to the ground ; his body was fastened by an iron chain to
the stake, and his neck by a strong rope twisted several times
round it. On his head was a wreath, woven of straw and leaves,
sprinkled with brimstone, through which suffocation might be
speedily effected. The book, which had occasioned all his misery,
was, according to the sentence, tied to his body, both the ma-
nuscript sent to Calvin for his opinion, and the printed work.
He now prayed the executioner to put an end to his sufferings
as speedily as possible. The officer brought the fire and kindled
the wood, so that he was surrounded by the circling flames. At
this sight he cried out so terribly that the whole people shrunk
back. As the pile continued to burn but slowly, a great many
of the people ran and cast additional bundles of wood into the
flames. Servetus cried continually to God for mercy. It is
possible, as one report states, that a strong wind prevented, for
a considerable time, the action of the fire. The torture, to
which the papal tribunals had so long doomed believers in
the Gospel, was prolonged in the case of Servetus, if we may
believe the account addressed to the Genevese, for half an hour.
Farel says nothing on the subject. At last Servetus cried aloud,
and this may be regarded as a sure sign that he persevered in
his belief, " Jesus, Thou Son of the eternal God, have mercy
upon me !" — protesting, in the midst of the flames, and in de-
fiance of the whole Christian world, against the doctrine of the
Trinity.
When the sun stood at the highest, in the autumnal sky, and
* Opusc. Fr. p. 1553.
A.D. 1553.] EXECUTION OF SERVETUS. 223
the clock in St. Peter's tower struck twelve, Servetus had ended
his sufferings, and the people dispersed in silence.
In the evening of this hot day, and when Calvin was sitting
retired in his study, Farel, who had soon to set out on his jour-
ney home, most probably came to him to rest awhile, and to
describe what had taken place. To realize the image of this
hour, I imagine to myself the evening sun colouring the distant
glaciers, while Calvin is seated at work, by the light of a lamp,
at his library table. On Champel there is a black spot, marked
by the signs of fire, and where the ashes of the heretic are still
lying, and will be found for many days. It is related that Ber-
nardin Ochino, who arrived from England the day after the exe-
cution, entered Geneva and immediately departed*.
And now we inquire, what were the feelings of the reformer
at the close of this affair ? From a letter which he wrote to
Bullinger, and by the statement of Farel, who described his
sentiments at this time in a letter to Blaarer, we may form some
opinion of the state of his mind. It seems that he had written
to inform Farel, who did not receive his last letter, acquainting
him with the trouble which he felt at the severity of the senate,
which rejected his application to allow Servetus a milder death.
The reasons which induced the senate thus to act, he would
explain to him by word of mouth. Farel too, it is probable,
related what efforts he had made to support Servetus by his
prayers. Their conversation will then have turned upon the
punishment of heretics, as apart from the crime of blasphemy,
Farel having observed, at the beginning of his letter, how neces-
sary such punishments were. He mentions that Calvin had
undertaken to confute the errors of the heretic, and to describe
his unhappy death. This was done, in quiet, on the same even-
ing, and Farel communicated the necessary information. As he
calls Servetus " the wretched and unhappy one " and " the dis-
honest heretic," this was, no doubt, the general tone in which
they spoke of him. The tranquil feeling with which Calvin
viewed all the proceedings of this period, serves also to indicate
the temper in which he and Farel discoursed. But the effort of
the libertines to destroy the discipline established in the church,
of which Calvin had shortly before spoken to Bullinger, and
on which the conservation of the church in Geneva so mainly
depended, must, in all probability, have engaged their attention,
far more than the death of an outlaw* whom all the world con-
* In the Vatican Manuscript, Mosheim, s. 292,
224 CALVIN AND SERVETUS. [CHAP. V.
demned. In whatever light we view the present period, a great
crisis had occurred in Calvin's life : his energy was roused to its
highest pitch, but altogether unconsciously to himself.
Contemplating as we are the execution of Servetus, the deli-
cate and interesting question may be asked, whether Calvin ever
really thought much about the death of that unhappy man ? If
he did not absolutely promote it, he certainly considered it just
and necessary. But the inquiry has no peculiar value if we
confine our attention to the times in which Calvin himself lived.
It is for our own age, for that which he helped to introduce,
that it is mainly important ; and we cannot but wish that his
mighty intellect had more clearly perceived the new principles
which lay undeveloped in him. And indeed, when some few bold
and earnest minds assailed him, affording more striking indica-
tions of the Christian spirit unfolding itself with Protestantism,
this made a deep impression upon him, although he continued, ac-
cording to Bullinger's advice, resolutely to defend the old system.
At a time when believers were on all sides mowed down in
troops, the evangelical church had already reached so high a
point in its principles, that it strongly censured, on its own part,
and never afterwards pardoned, the few severe acts of which its
members were guilty in imitation of the old papal rule. That
Calvin was startled hereby does honour to his awakened spirit.
Melancthon experienced nothing similar. The Genevese re-
former, like Beza, had often silently felt, when the might of
apostolic sentiment was victorious over that of the old covenant,
that his convictions had carried him too far. That such was the
case appears from the fact, that in his last discourses he let not
a word fall indicative of the great and serious injustice done
him, when his opponents found fault with him for a conduct
which was good, and necessary to the upholding of the church.
The mention of Servetus is dropped, as if he had never existed.
Beza, who was Calvin's second self, seems to have had Servetus
in view when he finally judges of Calvin's character, at the con-
clusion of his biography : " He rarely yielded himself," he says,
" to any passionate emotion, except when he had to deal with
religious errors and obstinate dispositions."
That Calvin gave the most earnest attention to matters about
which any doubt existed, or which appeared to him sometimes
holy, and sometimes the contrary, because of the transition-point
at which he himself stood, is evident from this : he, who had
passed a life pure and holy as few men's have been ; a life devoted
A.D. 1553.] CALVIN AND SERVETU9. 225
to the highest interests of humanity, makes repeated and espe-
cial mention in his last will of the sins which he had committed.
Beza takes particular note of this ; and the circumstances referred
to can be only such as they had both learnt to view otherwise,
under the light of the Gospel, than formerly. Indications of this
kind speak strongly in favour of Calvin's tenderness of disposition.
It has been already said, that in one of his letters he speaks
with a sigh of Servetus and Gentilis : " Ah ! if we could but
have obtained from Servetus a recantation like that of Gentilis !"
His sole wish was to give security to the church. I find another
indication of the same sort in his Preface to the Psalms. Here
he so surrenders himself to the prevailing sentiment, that he
speaks not a word of Servetus ; and it is interesting for the
student of human character, to find that, while he seems to take
pleasure in comparing himself with David, he ventures not to
institute the most distant comparison between himself and a
prophet or apostle. But David, the man after God's heart, had
committed great offences, had to endure many inward struggles,
and was surrounded by a host of outward enemies. He might
easily indeed understand the sins to which his evil passions
had given birth ; but Calvin could only by great susceptibility
of conscience discover the transgressions of which he had been
guilty through his zeal. They sprung from a holy principle,
and the prevailing error of his times ; so that he could never
clearly perceive their nature. At the first he even defended them
against his antagonists, and that with a good conscience.
We also see that he did not persevere in his views respecting
the punishment of death, even in the case of revilers. Had he
retained his original convictions, he would have again stated to
the council, in the strongest terms, when he addressed that body,
and the clergy, in his last speech, the right which he had against
his enemies, and the necessity of retaining such principles for
the support of the church. But the world was not yet ripe for
a change in these things ; and it is well known, that the laws
against heretics and blasphemers remained in force another
century and a half, even in countries enlightened by the re-
formation.
In reflecting therefore upon the execution of Servetus, we
are concerned with a period very different to that which serves
as a point of view for apostolic times. But we must here pause
awhile. Servetus deserved his punishment as a blasphemer ; but
his execution has another aspect for our age. We arc here con-
VOL. II. Q
226 PERSECUTION AND TOLERATION. [CHAP. V.
cerned with the toleration of error in its reference to that of
blasphemy. The spot where Servetus died marked, as it were,
the boundary between the barbarity of the middle ages, and the
refinement which has been effected by the light of the reforma-
tion. Here it was that those powerful voices, which grew might-
ier every day, were first lifted up in behalf of freedom of con-
science. We stand upon Champel : before us lies a Christian
city, but just freed from the trammels of superstition ; that city
is the abode of a reformer, well-versed in holy writ ; at his feet
sit hundreds of hearers. It is not however with him we have
now to do : he had some perception of approaching changes,
and helped to effect them. The Genevese council, the papal
church, and the people of the age, claim our present notice.
A burning pile in the midst of evangelical Christendom ! What
a theme for the lamentation of all future times ! More murders
were committed at this period by the papal church, according to
judicial form, than were ever perpetrated by wretches who lived
by crime. But the execution of Servetus made so deep an im-
pression on men's minds, because, forgetting the blasphemy of
which he had been guilty, they fixed their attention on the free-
dom of thought which the reformation advocated, and a course
altogether different to that pursued by the papists might natu-
rally be looked for on the side of evangelical Christians. Few
genuine martyrs therefore have gained so much notice as this
fanatic. A great principle, and the peace of the world, seemed
involved in the proceedings against him ; since, if intolerance be
allowed, one vast series of murders may be looked for, extending
even to the last man, who shall hold firm to his convictions.
Thus Champel is a melancholy monument of the past, but one
on which spirits may be discerned and proved.
Romanists rejoice, even to the present day, at the memorial of
this event, and remind protestants of it with bitter scorn. Bos-
suet, a wicked enemy of the truth, because well-acquainted with
Christianity, and an early witness of the persecutions in France,
speaks on this subject with diplomatic cunning. " We must
remind," he says, " the protestants, of the execution of heretics
at Geneva, if they complain so bitterly at being persecuted."
And the last wretched pamphleteering antagonist of Calvin raves
against him, as if he had been responsible for all the sins of the
middle ages, and the inventor of all the instruments of torture
employed by the papists. This writer, in fact, sets aside the en-
tire history of the Inquisition, and especially the condemnation
A.D. 1553.] PERSECUTION AND TOLERATION. 227
of Servetus at Vienne, as if these people could be justified in
persecuting us because we committed an error, for the principle
of which we have to thank themselves.
Christians weep over their sins when aware of them : the
Genevese lamented their early severity. i6 Would to God/5 said
one of them in the last century, " that we could extinguish this
burning pile with our tears ! " This is the common sentiment.
But the Romanists have imitated the heathen, and burnt num-
berless of their brethren, confessing their Saviour, to ashes. For
ten centuries have the flames raged upon the altar of their Mo-
loch. They could not inflict a greater penalty ; but had it been
in their power, gladly would they have destroyed the souls of
the faithful with their bodies. The death which they inflicted
was a symbol of their hatred to the truth. In their imbecile
wrath they burnt the body to ashes, or buried it alive, while the
spirit escaped their rage unharmed. Nor has the catholic church
ever renounced her old principle of persecution, or condemned
it as Satanic ; on the contrary, she still boldly defends it by her
recognized organs. Not one of her teachers has allowed it was
the spirit of Antichrist which then blinded them. It was her own
principle therefore which triumphed in the Genevese council ;
her sons are answerable for this deed ; the blood that was shed
cries out against her ; and till Rome pronounce aloud her con-
demnation of the spirit of persecution, the death even of Ser-
vetus will remain as a fearful witness against her. Calvin and the
members of the Genevese council, nurtured in these principles,
and surrounded by the auto-da-fees of the Inquisition, were not
answerable for the results. The whole protestant church is on
one side, and expresses its sorrow for the injustice perpetrated
against Servetus, Krell, and some others. And yet will the
papists venture, up to the present day, with insane rashness or
childish folly, as the latest publication on their side against the
reformer shows, to represent him as one of the worst characters
in history, because he desired the death of Servetus : they see
not that they are inflicting the deepest wound upon themselves,
by thus imputing their own guilt to us. It was they who con-
demned Servetus to the flames, long before he was judged by the
Genevese : they were anxious to become the privileged execu-
tioners of the world, and they only regarded such a sin as im-
possible among the reformers, because their conscience repre-
sented it to them as a simple type of their own.
J3ut, whatever may be said, Christians will ever look with
Q2
228 OPINIONS ON SERVETUS. [CHAP. V.
astonishment at the execution of Servetus, and will wonder how
Christians, who differed from each other on so many points,
could be of one mind in this, that the erring should be punished
with death ; nay, that all the great intellects of the day should
be agreed upon the point, and pronounce their Amen ! to the
sentence. In contemplating the event therefore of which we have
been speaking, we look in fact into the deep abyss of the sins of the
middle ages, which paid no regard to the rights of conscience.
Servetus, who insulted the holy and unchangeable faith of the
entire Christian world, ought certainly to have been condemned
to perpetual silence. But suppose that he had only strange per-
ceptions of Christianity, — perceptions which disturb when they
do not spring from a right faith, — still the burning pile which
shed its light into the future proclaimed the dawn of better times.
Yes, Servetus became a reformer by his freely protesting, even
unto death : he has aroused the indignation of evangelical
Christians in all ages against the sin of the papacy, which passed,
at the beginning, into our own church, — the sin, that is, of
punishing error with death. And the attention of mankind has
now been fixed on the idea, that there is a development of faith
superior to that which is merely protestant or catholic, — a pro-
blem for the coming age. Servetus was altogether a different
man to Gentilis, who retracted his opinions without a word ; and
to Joris, who lived in luxury at Basel, under a strange name,
and, as a false prophet, predicted his own speedy resurrection.
Some even regarded Servetus as a man of piety.
I imagine to myself, now that three hundred years have passed
away, a jury of impartial men, gathered from all the various
Christian churches, and assembled on the summit of Champel,
to pass a final judgement in this remarkable cause. If, aided
by all the necessary documents, they could transport themselves
to the period when the event took place, and examine those who
were eye-witnesses of the proceedings, they would in all proba-
bility free Calvin from the charge against him, and pronounce
him not guilty. Servetus, on the other hand, they would de-
clare guilty, but with extenuating circumstances. An impar-
tial jury would thus oppose the common judgement, which treads
sometimes the one and sometimes the other of these men in the
dust, and does justice to neither. Both excite our lively in-
terest. We cannot but shrink from adopting the opinion of
Mosheim, expressed with as much harshness as coldness : — " The
one searches after lost truth, and becomes a dreamer ; the other
A.D. 1553.] CASE OF SERVETUS RE-EXAMINED. 229
contends for truth abused, and becomes a homicide." A jury,
such as we have described, would especially recognize it as Cal-
vin's duty to punish such an offender, at a time when the preser-
vation of the truth was necessary to the safety of the world ; and
they would think of Moses, who punished the people at Sinai
for their idolatry. It was the spirit of the age to do so ; and it
would make a strong impression upon the mind of every judge,
that the laws which then existed, and the sentiments of mankind,
were in accordance with the proceeding. Calvin's zeal was
founded upon his conscientiousness : this is the key to his whole
being: it was his guide in the development of his system of
doctrine, in his moral judgements, and in his struggle for unity.
Both he and the council acted from so deep a sense of duty, that
it had a powerful influence on every one, as if, in the pressure
of the times, thus it was willed by the Spirit of God. All felt
that indifference to the schisms which tore the church would ruin
the reformation in the south, as was subsequently the case in
Poland, through the errors which there prevailed. It is not only
unjust, therefore, but a mark of ignorance, to blame Calvin for
having nobly done that which he believed it was his duty to per-
form.
Nor will impartial judges be blind to the real character of Ser-
vetus ; they will bear in mind that he not only adhered firmly
to his convictions, but that, lively, fantastic, and comet-like as
he was, he approached at length the spirit of Christianity. His
last moments indicate the germ of a genuine sense of freedom,
notwithstanding the power which a vicious disposition exercised
over him to the end. But Calvin, with his profound religious
feeling, with his simple Scriptural faith, rose higher than any
step which could be reached by all the philosophical knowledge
of God, belonging to that or any future age. The words of
Thomas a Kempis will here occur to mind : u What can it help
thee to be able to dispute learnedly on the doctrine of the Trinity,
if thou be wanting in the humility, without which thou canst
never please the Trinity?"
Not revenge, but a holy indignation, would the judges say,
must excite every one against the folly-perplexed Servetus. Cal-
vin, as the affair then presented itself, had the right to assert,
that the accused wished to overthrow all religion. Had he in-
deed been left free to exercise his extraordinary endowments,
and still for years to come, he being now only forty-four, to spread
his unbelief on all sides, and to strengthen his union with the
230 CASE OF SERVETUS RE-EXAMINED. [CHAP. V*
dangerous sects of the libertines and anabaptists, to which he
held out both his hands, there is little doubt but that the refor-
mation in the south would have been easily suppressed. A con-
scientious jury therefore would answer the objection, that Calvin
opposed Servetus when not in the territory of Geneva, and has-
tily acquainted the magistrates with his arrival in that city, by the
remark, that he had undertaken to labour, in the name of God,
for the spiritual good of all mankind, and not for a small, indi-
vidual church. This is rather for than against him. His friends
have never found fault with him on this account, and his enemies
only provoke ridicule, when they adduce the well-known letter to
Farel as evidence against him. Calvin considered it as an honour
to have deprived Servetus of the power of injuring mankind.
Mosheim asserts that Servetus was himself impetuous, and
would have punished Calvin as a heretic had he had him in his
power. Here the impartial judge is of a different opinion. Ser-
vetus speaks indeed as if heretics might be punished with death*,
and denounces Calvin as worthy of its infliction : but this proves
nothing ; his whole career, and the tendency of his mind, are op-
posed to it : he was characteristically liberal ; it was his grand
effort to realize the plan of the apostolic church, and, as a true
image of a free-thinker in the protestant community, he did not
shrink from comparing himself to the apostles of the Lordf.
This was the effect of his gross self-delusion.
A conscientious jury, again, would no doubt earnestly inquire,
whether the present age, any more than the past, would allow
itself to be judged according to the principles of another, far re-
mote, and of the feelings of which it could form no opinion, —
whether, under such circumstances, we might not be charged,
as well as the reformers, with all the follies of legislation, and with
the hundreds of executions which take place every year, — with
the executions, that is, which send so many unconverted souls
into eternity, for the purpose of securing the safety of the state,
and while it would be possible to proceed according to the prin-
ciples of a milder age, readily disposed to abolish the punish-
ment of death, as a remnant of barbarous times.
But posterity will never fail to behold the death of Servetus as
affording a striking instance of the powerlessness of disbelief,
of the curse * which rests upon blasphemy ; nor will it contem-
* Restit. p. G56. " Hoc crimen est morte simpliciter (lignum. "
f " Et maximi apostolorum fuerunt aliquando in errore." Ep. ad CEco-
lamp. Ep. Ref. Helv. p. 78.
A.D. 1553.] OPINIONS ON SERVETUS. 231
plate without admiration the spirit of that mighty man who
sought to defend the truth; as it ought ever to be defended, and
who at the same time esteemed the methods proper to the age in
which he lived as the best adapted to its support. We ourselves
should then have acted as he did, and should now restrain such
an offender as Servetus, who poured contempt on God, and all
that is holy, with the punishments known to our times. Had
he died in prison, as Campanus did, no complaint would have
been raised against Calvin. And how different was his con-
duct to that of a Philip of Spain, a Mary of England, an Alba,
a Richelieu, and others, all of whom, blinded by a political, fa-
natical and savage spirit, only desired to accomplish their own
selfish purposes ! Calvin, on the contrary, was inspired by an
earnest, holy zeal for the honour of God. We here behold the
peculiar sublimity and keenness of his intellect ; and we answer
the question, whether there can be times and circumstances in
which we may dare, as Christians, to call fire from heaven. We
will not say with Grotius, that the spirit of Antichrist was as
active on the shores of Lake Leman as on the banks of the Tiber ;
but we appeal to all the clergy of our age, both catholic and
protestant, and ask, who will venture to utter a wrord against
Calvin, or to cast a stone at him, — who there, with Melancthon,
Zwingli, Bullinger, Farel, Bucer, and Peter Martyr, raises his
countenance in prayer to heaven ?
How quickly vanishes the scene which we have described in
the grandeur of nature ! The smoke of the burning pile darkens
not the hills, which shine in perpetual beauty : those other times
have come, which were then but about to dawn ; and the Alps,
in their deep tranquillity, an image of the rock upon which our
faith is built, will testify in the day of promise, when the glad
message will resound from all quarters of the world, that the
pure Gospel has conquered, that the heathen have come in, and
that catholic and protestant are known no more in the apostolic
community, because the truth has loosened all the fetters of the
mind. But here, on the spot where Servetus died, must the
disciples of Christ vow to each other never again to mar the re-
constructed edifice of Christianity through their prejudices ; and
if these pure evangelical sentiments find a place in their hearts,
the citizens of Geneva will assemble on the 27th of October, 1853,
when three hundred years shall have passed away, and will ascend
the summit of Champcl, and there erect a pillar, with this in-
232 OPINIONS ON SERVETU8. [CHAP.V.
scription : " To all defenders of the faith, of freedom of mind, and
of conscience ! "
But we cannot yet leave this spot. It is but right that we
should hear the judgement of contemporary witnesses. Of these,
the most worthy are all on the side of Calvin. Christians of that
age beheld in Servetus a manifestation of Satan. The Swiss
churches feared that they might be regarded by the whole world
as his associates in the guilt of heresy, if they did not loudly
pronounce his condemnation. They were willing to exercise tole-
ration in the case of a Laelius Socinus. He reasoned only as a
scholar, and kept his errors to himself. Servetus, on the con-
trary, had declared that he would dissolve the protestant as well
as the catholic church. This difficult subject has always been
eagerly debated : it became at length matter of public contro-
versy between Mosheim and Armand de la Chapelle*. But it
is not the judgement of modern times — it is that of Calvin's con-
temporaries,— which really decides the case. He was the man of
the age : the best minds therefore were for him. It has been
already stated how Bucer expressed himself in the pulpit, de-
claring that Servetus deserved to be torn in pieces f. But the
most remarkable testimony remains still to be mentioned ; it is
that of the mild and amiable Melancthon, who, advanced in
years and free from passion, judged calmly and thoughtfully.
" Honoured man, and most beloved brother/' he writes to Calvin,
" I have read your letter, in which you excellently confute the
horrible blasphemy of Servetus; and I thank the Son of God,
who has been the umpire and the director of your conflict. The
church of Christ will also, both now and in all future times, own
its gratitude to you. I am wholly of your opinion, and declare
also that your magistrates, the entire proceedings having been
conducted according to law, acted quite justly in condemning
the blasphemer to death J."
Melancthon, whose opinion represented that of the times,
judged Servetus even more severely than Calvin, and undertook
the defence of the council when the offender suffered in the
flames. It is therefore a gross error still to complain of Cal-
vin, when, if he be viewed according to the sentiments of the
age, his proceedings were marked by moderation.
* Mosheim, pp. 2, 14, 270-6. Arm. de la Chapelle : in Biblioth. Rais. t. ii.
pt. i. p. 169. t Ep. ad Sulcer.
X Ed. Laus. Ep. 187. Ed. Amst. p. 92. Oct. 14, 1554.
A.D. 1553.] OPINIONS ON SERVETUS. 233
Again, Melancthon, speaking to Bullinger on the same subject,
says*, " I have read what you have written respecting Servetus,
and applaud your piety and your conclusions. I agree with you,
that the Genevese council was right in getting rid of so hardened
a man, who would never have ceased to blaspheme. It has often
been cause of surprise to me, that there are men who can find
fault with the severity which has been exercised. I send you a
few leaves in which I have stated my opinion." He also gave
his judgement still more distinctly, in writing, on the sentence
of Servetus, when it had been put in execution f. No one could
be more decided as to the punishment of heretics : thus he was
especially indignant against the rationalist, Theobald Thamer J.
In the year 1557 there appeared at Wittenberg a pamphlet,
warning people particularly against the errors of this man. It
appears to have been written by Melancthon. The author calls
upon the magistrates to prevent the spread of blasphemous opi-
nions, and represents the proceeding against Servetus as well
deserving imitation. He says of his execution, " that it afforded
a pious and memorable example for all posterity." Calvin was
therefore justified in appealing, at a subsequent period, to the
opinion of Melancthon.
The sentiments of Zwingli, and those also of CEcolampadius,
have been already given. Bullinger distinctly called upon Cal-
vin to punish Servetus as a heretic. When Calvin wrote to him
to say, that the report of the trial was to be sent to Zurich, Bul-
linger answered, on the 14th of September §, in the letter already
quoted, " If your council would but proceed against this wretched
man according to his deserts, the whole world would then see
that blasphemers are hated in Geneva, and that people know
there how to punish obstinate heretics with the sword of righte-
ousness, to the honour of the divine majesty." Bullinger also
expressed at a later period, in a letter to the Poles ||, his horror
of Servetus : — " My soul shudders whenever I think of his here-
sies and blasphemies ; I am convinced that, if Satan were to come
from hell, and were to proclaim his doctrines, according to his
own taste, he would use many of the expressions employed by
the Spaniard Servetus." Subsequently to this also, and when
Calvin was beset by opponents, he says^f, alluding to his work
* Ed. L. Ep. 214. Ed. Amst. p, 108. Aug. 20, 1555.
t See Christ. Pezel. Concilia, &c, Melancthon, 2, p. 223.
\ Ncander. Theob. Thamer, p. 50-52.
§ Ed. Laus. Ep. 162. Ed. Amst. p. 78.
|| Epist. Ref. Helvet. p. 371. IF Epist. 173. Hess. t. ii. 8.85.
234 OPINIONS ON SERVETUS. [CHAP. V.
on the punishment of heretics, " I know that many have wished
that you had not defended this principle ; but many also thank
you, and among others our church. Urbanus Regius has long
ago proved, in a work of his own, and all the ministers of Lune-
berg agree with him, that heretics, when they are blasphemers,
ought to be punished. There are also many other pious men
who think the same, and consider that such offenders ought not
only to be silenced, but to be put to death. Do not repent
therefore of what you have done : the Lord will uphold your
righteous efforts. I know that your disposition is not cruel, and
that you will favour no barbarity. Who knows not, that a
boundary must be set to things of this kind ? But how it could
be possible to spare such a man as Servetus, that sei-pent of all
heresies, that most obdurate of men, I see not."
Nothing need be said of Beza and Viret. Martin Chemnits
is equally severe against Servetus. The benevolent Musculus
uses these characteristic words : "I am horrified at such infa-
mous and godless principles ! May the Lord chastise this devil,
and keep his church for us in safety and purity of doctrine*/'
Three years after the death of Servetus, we read the following
judgement, given by Peter Martyr t : " I have nothing to say of
him, except that he was the very son of the devil, whose pesti-
lential and frightful doctrine should be everywhere hunted down ;
and that the magistrate who condemned him to death is not to
be blamed, seeing that he gave no sign of improvement, and that
his blasphemies were beyond endurance."
We have seen how sternly Farel decided the question J. He
adds, that all who favoured the anabaptists wished heretics to
be allowed to escape. " Having read how Paul expressed his
willingness to die, if he deserved it, I have often myself felt pre-
pared to die, if I could be charged with having taught false doc-
trine, and have owned, that I should be worthy of every punish-
ment if I enticed any one from the faith and knowledge of
Jesus Christ ; and I cannot pass on others a different sentence
to that which I should pass upon myself." Supported by such
testimony, Calvin might properly, in his controversy with Bern,
declare, " that the severity exercised against Servetus was uni-
versally approved §."
* Hess. Leb. Bull. t. ii. s. 83,95.
f Ep. ad Dorainos Polonos Evangelium profitentes et Eccles. Ministros.
Argent. Feb. 14, 155G. After his Loci, Com. Tigur. 1587.
% Calv. Sept. 8, 1553. § MS. Gen. Mai. 4, 1555.
A.D. 1553.] LUTHER ON TOLERATION. 235
How strong the impression was respecting the blasphemy of
Servetus, and how great a detestation of his name prevailed long
after his death, appears from the judicial proceedings instituted
against those who spoke in favour of his doctrine.
All the witnesses, to which we have thus appealed, give a clear
and open testimony. There are others who take part against
Calvin, but not fairly and openly* : against these it is a duty to
protest. Among modern writers, Trechsel, to whose sound
judgement we have before alluded, and Leot, expressly declare
themselves in favour of Calvin's conduct. Hase, in his Church
History}, still speaks of "a dark deed."
After this hearing of witnesses, we turn our attention for
awhile to the spirit which now animated the Lutheran church ;
and we shall show, that the "Reformed" were not more intolerant
than the Lutherans. The anabaptists were the only people at
this period who denied to the magistrate the right of using the
sword. We have still to mourn over two executions, those of
Krell and Gunther.
Protestant churches in later times have vied with each other in
the defence of toleration §. The reformers themselves varied in
their views on the subject. Luther, like Calvin, spoke sometimes
for and sometimes against the principle of toleration ; till at length
the old spirit of stern severity prevailed in them, and the churches
adopted their views. Noble are the expressions of Luther in
favour of toleration, in his work on the power of the civil ma-
gistrate, written in 1523, when his translation of the New Tes-
tament was proscribed. u God will suffer no one to rule over
souls, but himself alone." And in his treatise against the ana-
baptists (1528), he says, "It is not right that such wretched
people should be murdered, burnt, and barbarously destroyed.
Far better it would be to let every one believe what he will ; let
the Scriptures, let God's word be appealed to ; little can be
clone by the flames ; were it otherwise, hangmen would be the
most learned of doctors." The same good feeling is expressed
in the Concordian-formularies. But notwithstanding, we see by
what an intolerant disposition Luther was governed in his con-
duct towards the Sacramentarians. The consequence to his
church was, that the Reformed regarded it as their bitterest foe.
It is an error to suppose, that Calvin was opposed to all frcc-
* The author here particularly alludes to Heir Galiffe of Geueva.
f Allgera. Gesch. t. iii. s. 219. J S. 4G1.
§ Bibl. Angl. t. ii. p. 76.
236 INTOLERANCE OF REFORMERS. [CIIAP. V.
dom of opinion : he was intolerant only against blasphemy, and
what was wilfully designed for the destruction of the faith. In
his treatise against the Council of Trent, he insists upon freedom
of opinion against the pretensions of the catholic church ; but,
on the other hand^ he speaks against toleration in that part of his
work in which he justifies the punishment of heretics, and par-
ticularizes the doctrines, the preaching of which ought to be
punished with death. Still there are fine passages in all the
editions of the Institutes in behalf of this virtue. Even his con-
duct toward Servetus proves, that he was not intolerant against
those who merely differed in opinion from himself: he only de-
sired that they should not openly oppose the recognized doctrines
as reformers. Bullinger spoke in this manner respecting Soci-
nus: (< I repressed his petulant curiosity as much as possible; "
but when Socinus became the assailant, Bullinger used strong
words, and in the same sense as Calvin*. Luther considered
it very dangerous to allow the principle of intolerance to be-
come general, but still he wished obstinate heretics to be pu-
nished f. He was not true therefore to his early sentiments.
The anabaptists were put to death in Saxony, as everywhere
else. Luther also stated it as his opinion to Philip of Hesse,
that it was lawful to inflict capital punishment on heretics ; and
this opinion was subscribed by Melancthon, Bugenhagen and
Cruciger. He urges them to pursue this course in the case of
such as deny that Christ is Godf.
It seems evident therefore that Luther would have formed the
same judgement on the case of Servetus as Calvin. To an in-
quiry of the Wittenberg theologians, " whether it was lawful to
punish anabaptists with the sword/' we find his assent written in
his own hand, "placet mihi Luthero"§. So we also read, "Where-
ever they are found to be the authors, or receivers, and have for-
bidden articles, they may be capitally punished, as those who
have instituted conventicles, against the mandates which have
been publicly issued."
This variation in Luther's views, and his intolerant conduct
toward the Sacramentarians, had so injurious an effect, that im-
mediately after his death, a bitter hostility was excited against
the "Reformed." About seven years after his decease, the mem-
* Hess. Leben Bullingers, t. ii. s. 86.
f Dc Wette, t. iii. s. 347 ; and for the other view, see Comm. Luth. in Ps. 71.
X Luther's Wcrke : Altenburg, t. v. s. 286, and a longer passage in the Ger-
man exposition of Psalm 82, v. 4.
§ Heidelberger Universitatsbibliothek, cod. 435, bl. 33.
A.D. 1553.] PERSECUTION OF KRELL. 237
bers of the English reformed church in London, consisting
mostly of Germans and Netherlander, sought refuge in Ham-
burgh and Denmark. Their flight had taken place in the winter,
but they were forcibly driven from the shelter which they be-
sought, because they differed from the Lutheran church on the
subject of Christ's presence in the sacrament. It is universally
known, that the clamour against the Crypto-Calvinists was
continued into the seventeenth century. Not less generally
known are the proceedings against Nicolaus Krell, a doctor, and
chancellor to the elector Christian I. of Saxony. On the death
of this prince, Krell was apprehended as a criminal, under the
pretence that he had endeavoured to introduce Calvinism into
Saxony. This event occurred on the 23rd of October, 1591, and
after ten years' imprisonment the unfortunate ex-chancellor was
beheaded in the Judenhof at Dresden*.
This melancholy occurrence, though less known, is far more
lamentable, considering all the circumstances of the case, than
the affair of Servetus at Geneva. Krell was merely accused of
having diffused the so-named Calvinistic errors, and certainly not
of having desired to overthrow the church. Other communities
were not asked to state their views on the question of his guilt,
and nothing was proved against him. Not a word was said of
his having blasphemed : on the contrary, he died as a pious
Christian ; and it would be difficult to explain, why he was not
kept as a prisoner at Konigstein, if he was really feared. The
elector Christian was very favourable to the doctrines of the
* Reformed/' took the part of the king of Navarre, and sent
troops to France. Krell was so greatly esteemed by his master,
that the latter entrusted to him the guardianship of his children :
but he was hated by the nobility. Both he and the elector were
anxious to soften the spirit of Lutheranism ; the first ministers
of the country agreed with them, and in 1591 the practice of
exorcism at baptism was suppressed. The elector's confessor
published a Bible, with annotations, which was ascribed to Krell.
The hostility against him increased more and more : immediately
after Christian's death it broke forth. Four weeks only had
elapsed when he was apprehended, and four clergymen with him.
The country was placed under a regent, duke Frederic. At his
command, and by the consent of the states, the trial was com-
menced, and Krell was unrighteously accused of numerous of-
fences. It is evident from his history, that he was condemned
* Leben, Schicksa), Ende des Dr. N. Krell. Leipzig, 1798.
238 TRIAL OP KRELL. [CHAP. V.
illegally and unheard. He admitted not a single point of the
accusation, but the judges were expressly instructed not to hear
his defence. On the 5th of October, 1601, he was brought from
Konigstein to Dresden, as strictly guarded as if he had been
one of the most dreaded of criminals. Having partaken of the
sacrament, he was carried, on account of his weakness, to the
court of justice on a chair. The sentence purported, " that he
had employed body and life against the peace of the land, and
to the ruin of its tranquillity and union ; that he must therefore
die."
During the reading of the sentence, Krell exclaimed to the
judge : " Cease, and hear my answer : listen, whether I acknow-
ledge these crimes, before you execute me!" But the judge
broke the staff before the sentence was half-finished. " I confess
not one point of that which is laid to my charge," continued Krell.
" Where are my accusers ? Where are the witnesses ? Shall the
contrary proof of my innocence avail nothing ? " It was an-
swered, that that was not the time for disputation. " I can tes-
tify," rejoined Krell, " before God and my conscience, that I am
innocent of all these things." The judges rose, expressed their
indignation, and were joined by the people. Krell now saw that
they had resolved on his death ; and bowing his head, with his
hands raised to heaven, he said, " Well then, in the name of God,
let the will of the elector of Saxony be done ! May God have
mercy ! I perish innocently. I am indeed a poor sinner, but
I have never committed the evil deeds here laid to my charge :
my accusers must answer it at the last day."
It was eleven o'clock when he was carried forth, still resting
on a chair, to the place of execution, the Judenhof. He prayed,
in the meantime, devoutly and with a loud voice. A large mul-
titude followed him and bewailed his fate. The widow of the
elector Christian had taken her position, with some ladies of the
court, in the gallery of the new mews, whence the execution might
be conveniently seen. That she might be near the spot where
the drama was to be performed, the scaffold which, some clays
before, had been erected at a little distance from the mews, was,
by her command, broken up, and reconstructed close to the
gallery.
Krell was now brought to the place where he was to end his
life. At the sight of the scaffold, his ordinary resolution forsook
him, and he fell into a swoon, from which he was only recovered
by the use of stimulants. As soon as he revived, he was taken
A.D. 1554.] EXECUTION OF KRELL. 239
from the chair on which he had been brought, and was placed
on another without a back. The Christianity of the man was
now well-exhibited : he prayed all those whom he had in any
way injured to forgive him ; he prayed also for the emperor, the
elector, and for his enemies, concluding with these words: "Lord
God, Thou who hast created me ; Lord, Son of God, who hast
redeemed me ; Lord, Holy Ghost, who hast sanctified me ! today
I render back the pledge wherewith Thou hast entrusted me !"
While he was thus praying, the executioner stripped the upper
part of his body, and asked him if he had prepared himself
for death. Krell answered nobly in the affirmative. His hands
were then bound, his arms having been drawn behind him and
fastened with straps and buckles. He was now allowed to sit
for a little while. Expecting the stroke, he made a strong effort,
and raised his head : an attendant pressed it down again. The
executioner now coming behind him tore away some braids
which hindered his operations, and levelled his weapon at the
martyr. The moment after he took up the head, and showing
it to the people, exclaimed jestingly, u Krell, how liked you the
Calvinistic stroke ? O how many strange things there were in
this head ! There are many more such in this crowd. I think
some of these people must still fall into my grasp."
On the following day the dead body was carried, accompanied
by a procession of the clergy and schools, and with singing, to
the Frauenkirche. There the confessor Blume delivered a
funeral discourse, which appears to have been harsh and severe.
The body was then buried in the churchyard. The sword by
which he was beheaded is still shown in the armoury at Dresden.
On one side is the following inscription : " Conradin Pols ;" and
" Cave Calvinianae. D. N. C." (Dominus Nicolaus Crell). The
latter was the name of this martyr of Calvinistic doctrine; the
former, that of the executioner.
There is still another occurrence of a similar, but yet more
striking, character to be mentioned, as connected with the later
history of the Lutheran church. We refer to the execution of
Gunther, who, like Scrvetus, opposed the doctrine of the Trinity,
and whose last words sounded like those of the Spaniard.
Krell's fate might, in some degree, be connected with political
motives ; but such could not be the case with that of the man
whose execution took place in October, 1GS7, and which was
purely the result of fanaticism and the dread of schism. The
240 OPINIONS ON TOLERATION. [CHAP. V,
superintendent Petersen, in Lunebcrg, has given an account of
this event*.
It is refreshing and encouraging to see how, in many parts of
Italy and France, the minds of men were awaking out of slumber,
and preparing to declare themselves on the side of freedom
and inquiry ; some indeed with an intelligence which we could
not wish to see excelled even in the present age. It was the
dawn of a new civilization. An actual revolt against the council
at Geneva appeared in the writings and poems of the day.
People declared that a new inquisition was established ; that if
Christ himself came to Geneva, he would be crucified ; and that
there was now a pope in that city as well as at Rome. Bolsec
published in the Pays de Vaud the most insulting slanders f.
The preachers at Geneva in the meantime raged against the
name of Servetus, and again condemned him. Thus it was
natural that the question should be anxiously asked, whether
heretics, and if any, what class of heretics, ought to be punished
with loss of life ? It is plain, as Luther strongly intimated,
that if the principle of intolerance was once allowed, the catholics
would want no pretence to annihilate the protestants. But
while some insisted upon the necessity of bridling the teachers
of false doctrine, others were equally anxious for entire freedom.
Beza, in his Life of Calvin, expressed it as his opinion, that
Castellio and Socinus were the first among those who contended
for liberty of conscience. Castellio uttered bold sentiments on
the subject, in the preface to his translation of the Scrip-
tures, which concealed others. Many persons declared them-
selves scholars of Servetus, without the least knowledge of his
doctrines.
Calvin would probably have despised this noisy abuse, as he
did so many other attacks ; but it so increased, that Bullinger
advised him to defend the opinion, that it is the duty of ma-
gistrates to punish false teachers J. This was a remarkable step.
Calvin found himself indeed in a perplexing situation. The
principle was not yet settled as to the means which should be
employed to secure the unity of the church ; and the case of
* See Leben Wilhelm Petersens, doctor und superintendant zu Hannover
urid Liineberg, s. 66. Also Arnold's Ketser-historie, t. ii. s. 434.
t He sung, as he went about, a song full of infamous expressions against
Calvin. Trechsel has given a poem against him, written by C'amillus Renatus
Rhetus. There were some however in his favour. Mosheira, 8. 276.
I Ilesponsio ad Bald. Couvitia.
A.D. 1554.] DEFENCE OF TOLERATION. 241
Servetus was used against him. Calvin composed accordingly,
in the same year, the often-cited work, written in French,
against Servetus, — a defence, which only served to excite a still
larger number of antagonists. When Calvin was silent, Bcza
entered upon the controversy, and produced a well and carefully
written treatise.
Calvin began by showing, that the civil power ought to bear
with the erring, but to restrain incorrigible heretics and blas-
phemers with the sword. He supported his assertion by an appeal
to the law of God*. It is worthy of remark, that Servetus, so
passionately in love with liberty, entirely assented to the principle
thus asserted by Calvin. Even according to his own views,
obstinate heretics ought to be punished with loss of life, and not
merely with banishment f. In the second place follows the
proof, that Servetus was really the heretic stated, and deserving
of the punishment which he received. The argument to this
effect is drawn from his own history, from his whole corre-
spondence with Calvin, from his trial and examination, and
lastly from his works, the errors contained in which are con-
futed. This was no private undertaking; it was subscribed by
all the Genevese preachers, fifteen in number.
On the whole, this work obtained considerable praise. Some
however, and Musculus among others, were not satisfied with
the design, and Bullinger considered it too short for the depth
and obscurity of the subject J. How Calvin himself judged of
the work appears from the following expressions : fk This little
book is very brief, and stormily written, but it is better than
nothing §." So also, in an answer to Bullinger's criticism, he
says ||, "I have particularly endeavoured to prevent the brevity
of this work from increasing the obscurity of the subject, but
I have not been able altogether to avoid it. My plan of itself
* See this remarkable passage. Ed. Amst. Opusc. p. 516. a. Ed. Gen.
p. 599- a.
t Christ. Restit. p. 656, Ep. 28. " Illutl verum est, quod correctione non
expectata Ananiam ct Sapp. oceidit Petrus; quia SpiritU9 Sanctus tunc
maxime vigens, quern spreverant, doccbat esse incorrigibiles, in malitia obs-
tinatos. lloc crimen est morte simpliciter dignum, et apud Deura ct apud
homincm. In aliis autem criminibus, ubi Spirit us Sanctus speciale quid non
docet, ibi non est inveterata malitia aut obstinatio certa non appafet, aut
atrocitas magna, correctionem per alias castigationes sperare potius debemus,
quam mortem inferre. Inter correctiones exilium laudamus Christo ita pro-
batum, ut excommunicato probatur in ecclesia."
t Hess, Leben Bullingera, t. ii. s. 95.
§ Ed. Laus. p. 171. Ed. Amst. p. 24 1.
|| April 29, 1554. The autograph is at Zurich.
VOL. II. R
242 DEFENCE OF TOLERATION. [CHAP. V.
constrained me, from various causes, to write with as much
simplicity as possible. It was my whole object to make plain and
unlearned people easily understand the contemptible character
of the Spaniard. I shall be well-satisfied however with the
reward of my labour, if it be only allowed that I have, with true
faith and honest zeal, defended the right doctrine. You will, I
doubt not, from love to me, and from your own just and pure
spirit, judge of me with kindness. Others pursue me with
harshness, as if I were a teacher of the most horrible cruelty ;
and as if I still wished, by means of my writings, to tear a dead
man to pieces, a man who perished by my hands. But there are
some, who have no evil will against me, and who yet wish that
I had not written this book on the punishment of heretics.
They think that others have been silent simply to avoid being
hated*. But it is my good luck to have you for a partner in
my offence, if an offence it be ; for you in fact are the instigator
and author of the undertaking. Be prepared therefore for the
strife."
Three voices were now distinctly, in three different works,
raised in behalf of freedom of conscience. The productions
alluded to were, that of the pseudo Martinus Bellius ; the i Dia-
logi inter Calvin um et Vaticanum ;' and the noble work of Minus
Celsus, a reformed Italian nobleman, whose milder tone breathes
entirely of the pure spirit of the Gospelf. He had been obliged
to flee his native land, and was very much shocked to find at
Graublinden, the common rendezvous of the dissenters of that
period, instead of the hoped-for harmony, nothing but strife and
division, and even the hated rule of persecution. As soon as
he was made acquainted with the death of Servetus, and had
heard many eye-witnesses speak of his fortitude, and express
their conviction that a man could not die as he did without the
spirit of God, — when he found that these people regarded the
heretic as a martyr, and fell from their orthodox professions, be-
cause they were thus led to look on heresy as truth, — he resumed
a treatise, which he had begun some time before, and translated
it into Latin, just as Calvin's own work made its appearance.
Celsus died, and it was not till after twenty years that his ex-
cellent work was printed. It is conceived in a true Christian
* This may possibly refer to Bullinger himself, who urged Calvin to under-
take the task, instead of doing it on his own responsibility.
t Celsus was a native of Sienna, and was probably first instructed by his
countryman Ochino.
A.D. 1554.] CALVIN OPPOSED. 243
spirit, and evinces great love for truth. The toleration which it
displays is a lesson for all ages, and its author was no disciple
of Servetus. Heretics, according to him, should be restrained,
but not condemned. This was the purest testimony in favour
of freedom of conscience known in those unsettled times. The
principle of toleration exercised no prevailing influence in Ger-
many till after the thirty years' war ; and although the mighty
voice of De Thou was raised in France against the demon of
persecution, especially in his celebrated preface to his history, it
re-echoed for the time to no purpose.
A voice in favour of freedom was also raised in Bern : it
was that of a distinguished man, Zur Kinden*, the state-secre-
tary at Bern, and a friend of Calvin. He candidly expressed
his displeasure, as did others, and considered, that the first part
of Calvin's work ought to have appeared in the name of the
council, and that he should not have undertaken individually to
support a view which was hateful to all. A characteristic letter,
written by Calvin to this correspondent at a somewhat later
period, still exists : he pours out to him his afflicted heart,
and declares, that although people regarded him as implacable,
there was no man upon earth less revengeful than himself in any
private cause. As for his severity against the wicked, there was
this to justify him : he had prophets and apostles for his ex-
ample. That he was excitable, he did not deny ; and he endea-
voured to correct the fault, lamenting that he did not make so
much progress in the effort as he could wish. If however any one
expected him to be rendered gentle and humane by the hasty
condemnation of his zeal, which was pious and righteous, as
God was his best witness, he would find it difficult to discover
others inclined to adopt the same idea.
Many of the Italian refugees now came forth, and with ri-
baldrous songs threatened that the spirit of Servetus was about
to re-appear. The hatred against Calvin continually increased :
his name was almost become a word of reproach. Two years
later Hotoman wrote t, " People speak of him here, in Basel,
as contemptuously as in Paris." But the friends of the reformer
supported him in his troubles. Zanehi wrote a tract on the
Coercion of Heretics, in 1554 : it was in defence of Calvin.
The latter himself thus expressed his own present and inward
hope : — " It is well that we have a pilot, under whose protection
* He wrote to Calvin, Feb. 10, 1534, on the subject referred to. I!ii>!
Gen. cod. 114. Trechsel, s. 2G9. t To Bullinger, Sept. '17, 1555.
244 SYSTEM OF SERVETUS. [CHAP. V.
we may be secure against shipwreck, and that we are not far
from our haven*." He had even prepared to leave Geneva.
Bullinger wrote to him on the subject during the trial of Ser-
vetus f. " Forsake not, I beseech you, the flock which contains
so many excellent men. Think on Him, who aforetime said to
Paul, i Be not afraid5 but speak, and hold not thy peace : for I
am with thee, and no man shall set on thee to hurt thee : for I
have much people in this city.5 You may well suppose how
the enemies of the Gospel would rejoice, and to what perils you
would leave the pious refugees from France, were you to depart.
Remain therefore, and endure what God appoints you." And
in another letter of the 12th of January, 1554, he again exhorted
him to continue his labour in the same spirit as before, for that
God would bless his work and his earnestness.
Calvin had not attacked Servetus in the first edition of his
Institutes : the Spaniard had not then become dangerous :
it is only in the last edition that mention is made of him ;
but even here the notice taken of him is but cursory. We may
properly however close the history of Servetus with a com-
pressed but systematic account of his doctrine. The chief dif-
ficulty in this undertaking arises from the circumstance, that
Servetus remained to the last immature in spirit, which at the
time of the principal controversy had acquired no degree of
firmness or self-confidence. If Calvin had quietly proved him,
and learnt to understand his nature, he would probably have
accused him on very different grounds. His conscience cried
against him, but he neglected to consider the volatile disposition
of the man. He regarded him only in an ecclesiastical point of
view, and was not aware that, amidst all his failings, there was
something lofty and even interesting in his being. Calvin did
not comprehend his main disposition, the philosophical element
which predominated in him, but without entirely suppressing
the religious principle. He neglected to point out to him the
contradictions and obscurity which must necessarily spring from
such a source, and when again the religious element is sub-
jected to the power of a fantastic imagination.
But herein lies the secret of the mysticism which charac-
terized Servetus : he rejected philosophical reflection, protested
against it in the severest terms when the doctrine of the Trinity
was concerned, and insisted that people ought to give them-
* Ed. Laus. Ep. 171. Calv. Bullingero. Feb. 22, 1554.
\ Ed. Laus. Ep. 157. Ed. Arast. p. 78. Sept. 14, 1553,
A.D. 1554.] SYSTEM OF SERVETUS. 245
selves wholly up to the child-like, living faith of the first
apostolic age. But when the doctrine respecting God, in his
own system, became the subject of debate, he then sought to
comprehend Deity, gave the reins to his fancy, raised a pan-
theistic structure, and objected to Calvin that he was no philo-
sopher. Knowledge indeed, he said, ought to be kept subor-
dinate to the religious principle, but still the latter is not the
all-prevailing fundamental element. Thus his dogmatic pro-
positions are not absolutely bound up, or blended, with his main
philosophical ideas.
If Servetus had clearly comprehended his own system of rea-
soning, or had he fully wrought out his pantheistic notion of
Deity, conscious in all things, Christ would probably have
become to him the personal, self-revealing God, and God the
common substance. It is to this that his system, fairly followed
up, would lead ; but his religious feeling would not allow him
to go so far. He rejected the doctrine of the Trinity, as esta-
blished by the early councils, the distinctions of persons, the
union of the divine and human natures in Jesus, the eternal
generation of Christ, and the procession of the Holy Ghost,
without perceiving that the apostolic church distinctly recog-
nized these doctrines, and that the Nicene, and the so-called
Athanasian Creed, had their gradual and necessary origin in
the struggle against heretics, who understood not the revelation
of God.
According to Servetus, redemption and justification, in the
sense of the church, are not at all necessary. God created his
Son to reveal the mystery of the divine nature ; He contem-
plates himself in this his perfect image ; and man contem-
plates God in order to raise and conform himself to that image,
and again in God to live, or personally to cease. But this is
obscure, God being in Himself incomprehensible. A living
knowledge of God can only proceed, according to Servetus, from
the historical Christ, independent of whom truth is but an
abstraction. Thus the doctrine of Christ is, with him. the funda-
mental, and the only proper, article of faith belonging to the
apostolic church. The distinction of persons in the Godhead
was to him altogether unintelligible; but he asserted that God
was actually in Christ upon earth, and that Christ must be
honoured as God. AYc would fain view this principle as the
groundwork of his system ; but here we are met with another
difficulty. Servetus had no idea of original sin : thus the doctrine
246 SYSTEM OF SERVETUS. [CHAP. V.
of Christ as a Redeemer was wanting in his creed. Hence
also he rejected infant-baptism ; and man, in the being of Christ,
falls into the background.
It has been commonly supposed that Servetus revived the
heresies of Paul of Samosata, Sabellius and Photinus. But
that he was far apart from these three ancient heretics, and
that his peculiarly constituted mind led him into much greater
errors, if it did not indeed embrace those of all the three, is
sufficiently evident. He began with placing himself above all
other teachers : he rejected Lutherans, Calvinists, Catholics,
and confined himself to no one system whatever. " I believe,"
he said, "that both parties (Protestants and Catholics) have a
portion of truth and a portion of error*/' True Christianity,
according to him, must finally triumph upon earth, and is supe-
rior to all earlier systems. Thus the fervours of a living faith, to
which his fancy gave wings, are not to be despised f. Servetus
in one respect agreed with the present times, in which Catho-
licism and protestantism are often viewed as only two sides of
Christianity, while a higher expression of its doctrine is felt to
be still needed. How little Servetus thought himself a heretic,
appears from the fact, that he placed Paul of Samosata at the
head of all who deserve that name J.
It may be gathered from what has been said, that the relation
between knowledge and faith was necessarily left obscure in the
system of Servetus. The understanding, and not the Scriptures,
was to him the fountain of knowledge. The understanding de-
fines the being of God, and the holy Scriptures must establish
it. He set little value on tradition. In philosophy he agreed
with Plato, against Aristotle. Plato, he thought, derived his
knowledge from the East, and from Anaxagoras, Parmenides, &c.
He hoped however to stand higher himself, and, weary of the
philosophy of his times, he sought to lay the foundations of a
better wisdom. Against the Aristotelian method of reasoning
he protested, as against a common evil : the Aristotelian logic,
and ignorance of Hebrew, he regarded as the cause of all the
errors which existed. Philosophy however was necessary, and
he made it the subject of rebuke to his opponent that he was
unphilosophical. " I have said it with the best intentions, you
* De Justificat. c. iv. De Charitate.
t His prayer, at the end of his preface to the ' Restitutio/ may be referred
to as an illustration of this remark.
J De Trinit. Error, lib. vii. fol. Ill, b.
A.D. 1554.] SYSTEM OF SERVETUS. 247
are ignorant of the principles of things, you dream of imaginary
qualities." He lays down, in a letter to Calvin, a maxim re-
specting the being of God, which he had derived solely from
reflection : it is, that God must be everywhere present. But
still, he allowed himself to be guided by Scripture, and he even
declares, that all is false which is not derived from that source.
In the second development of his system he indulged in a
far more speculative course. His knowledge consequently of
saving faith must, according to these premises, have been very
unsatisfactory. In the work ' De Fide et Justitia/ he expresses
himself more clearly than in his early writings. The essence of
faith, with him, is a certain confidence, a free movement of the
will, and not a habit of the heart, through which we receive
Christ, and thus become quickened by his spirit. This faith is
the source of every good. " You cannot," he says, " believe
that Christ is in truth the Son of God, that he died for the
pardon of your sins, without hating the sin for which He suf-
fered so much." Again, " This living faith has, of necessity,
hope and charity for its companions." So too, all is made to
rest upon the knowledge of Christ. " I have always said, I say
it now, and will continue to say, that all Scripture refers to this
doctrine, that Christ is the Son of God — Christ acquires a form
in us."
But this confession of faith was only seemingly true. No
actual acknowledgment of sin, and of condemnation, was con-
nected with it. The law was taken away through Christ, and
faith is represented as wonderfully bestowed by Him on men,
but without being grounded on the principle of inward convic-
tion. The idea and knowledge of Christ form the starting-
point of the system. Thus, according to Servetus, the bright
form of Christ is impressed upon us, and it is only when this
takes place that we become conscious of our wretchedness.
Here we have a direct perversion of the doctrine of the
Gospel. To understand Servetus, we must recur to the prin-
ciple, that it is possible for us to realize the idea of the divine
and human, and to impress it upon our souls as a substantial,
luminous form. Thus the form of Christ within us, as the result
of the operation of the spirit of Christ, maturing our faith, and
impressing upon us the idea of Christ, is to be regarded as the
grand object of our inward contemplation. In this manner also,
God becomes inwardly visible to the eye of faith ; and believers,
through the image of the Son of God in their souls, are made
248 SYSTEM OF SERVETUS. [CHAP. V.
partakers of the Lord, to which, in the sacrament, are added his
body, flesh and bones, for the nourishment of the new man.
If we now review the doctrine of the being of God, Servetus,
who pretended to solve the problem by thought alone, will fur-
nish us with less infallible rules, according to which we may
comprehend the nature of the Most High. In the first place,
the divine essence is indivisible ; and, in the second, that which
appears in nature is but a disposition of deity.* Three persons
are inconceivable to the understanding. To form however such
a notion of persons, we must look to the dispositions of the indi-
visible God.
At his first appearance, Servetus opposed G^colampadius with
these fundamental principles of his system. He asserted, that
Christ had not existed from eternity, except as the idea of Christ.
Like Sabellius, he did not absolutely object to the doctrine of
three persons; but he would not acknowledge their independent
self-existence ; he admitted it only as so many relations, under
which the divine essence appeared. The perfections of God
could not be here spoken of; since his essence, like pure light,
disperses not itself in various hues. God, in his entire fulness
and strength, is everywhere present, and it is not lawful for human
reason to divide God's power, in order to form various powers,
seeing that the ray of pure light, broken into various colours, is
no longer the light itself. It is inconceivable how the personal-
ity of God should be eternally preserved, after it has been dis-
played in various characters.
We here discover the source of his fierce opposition to the
reformers and the catholics, whose fundamental principle is a
holy belief in the Most High,in that eternal and personal essence,
which, altogether distinct from the world, created it free and
separate ; which includes all perfections within itself; before
which all created beings feel bowed in the sense of their misery
and sin ; and in which there is a necessary Trinity and Unity.
In the last part of the ( Restitutio ' we have the paper written
by Servetus against Melancthon, who had powerfully assailed
his doctrine in his ' Common Places/ Servetus thought that he
was bound to treat Melancthon like Calvin : he spoke of him
indeed as somewhat more reasonable than Luther and Calvin,
but only in regard to the doctrine of free-will : in other respects
he was as senseless as the rest. The devil must have inspired
him with his notion of personality. As Melancthon called him
* De Trinit. Error, lib. vii. f. 118, a.
A.D. 1554.] SYSTEM OF SERVETUS. 249
a disciple of Paul of Samosata, so he in return styled Melanc-
thon and Calvin scholars of Simon Magus; Augustin and
Athanasius were, according to him, servants of Antichrist. He
asserted that the true doctrine of the Gospel was to be found in
Irenacus only, and in some few others of the ancient fathers. On
the other hand, the church had ceased, lie believed, to exist since
the council of Nicaea, and the publication of the doctrine of the
Trinity. He remained true to the notion advanced in his first
work, that there are no persons in God, but dispositions only,
— manifestations, that is, of the divine essence. But what such
manifestations or dispositions are, or how the one is separated from
the other, or the Word from the Spirit, is not stated. The
Word, according to him, is not the voice of God, but an oracle,
an expression of God, which appeared in the angels, whereby
God answered Moses. At the beginning was an expression of
God with God, and this oracle was God himself. He subse-
quently gave a fuller statement of the doctrine thus advanced,
as may be seen in his account of the creation, and of Christ.
The doctrine of the Trinity was to him Tritheism ; and he de-
scribed the eternal generation of the Son as a vain and unholy
philosophy, and the disfiguring of God by a division into per-
sons as the greatest of blasphemies. This is the necessary con-
sequence of his philosophy, God being represented as a simple
being, in whom Christ was not personally existing. To avoid
all difficulties, therefore, Servetus proceeds from the principle,
that God, as an almighty being, can adopt all forms to make
Himself manifest. This revelation however is not connected
with any inward necessity pertaining to the being of God. Ser-
vetus merely supposed, that the Deity could not be comprehended
without this manifestation or revelation. In this respect his
views were very different to those of later theorists, who assert,
that we may apprehend God by pure thought, or by the under-
standing. God freely closed the two revelations, by which we
should feel and perceive Him. These forms pertain only to
Deity. The expressions which Servetus employs are, ( dispo-
sition,' 'ceconomy,' ' form/ ' personal representation,' and fa
kind of revelation,' ca species of divine relation,' ca manifes-
tation.' He would own nothing like an emanation of Deity. If
the word person, however, were to be taken in the sense in which
the Latins used it — that is, as describing the outward form or
appearance of a man — a Trinity, he said, might be admitted, and
it would not be an error to speak of three persons in one God.
250 SYSTEM OF SERVETUS. [CHAP. V.
In the Old Testament these persons were shadows and types.
They who heard the Word, saw and perceived only an outward
appearance ; they, on the contrary, who received the Spirit, felt
his power. These were, so to say, experiments for bringing
forth the personality of Christ, and of the Holy Ghost, as, ac-
cording to the later philosophy of religion, the eternal law of the
universe tends to exhibit the personality of God, in subordinate
manifestations, and through a circle of unconscious substances,
till at last it produces Christ, the actual personality of God.
And this manifestation of the Trinity, says Servetus, will again
disappear, as not of necessity existing. God might also have
created worlds altogether different to those now in being. So
too He might have adopted other forms ; and thus there might
have been, instead of a threefold, a fourfold or a fivefold per-
sonality ; — a bold idea, and one which shows how high a notion
he had formed to himself of the divine essence. The unity might
have broken itself, by various means, into visible rays ; for ex-
ample, for the sake of beings differently constituted to ourselves.
An interesting passage occurs in the ( Dialogues on the Trinity/
respecting the cause why God created the universe. The in-
visible God, he says, resolved by his own free will to create the
wprld, and to reveal Himself to us ; for the creation would have
been without use if God had remained unknown. The Almighty
said, " Let it become," and by his word He created the Logos,
or Elohim, or Christ. And as He spake, He imposed upon
himself a certain rule, and wrought somewhat in himself, when
He became a Creator. He now acts otherwise than originally :
He reveals himself; whereas before, dwelling in eternal silence,
He was known to no one. By the word, f Let there be light/
He transferred himself from eternal darkness into light, and
became comprehensible by a bright- shining form, which John
called ' The Word/ and Moses, ' Elohim.' This light remained
hidden under the image of angels, till it shone forth in the face
of Christ. Then also God the Spirit began to be, for there was
no spirit before God breathed.
Servetus afterwards expressed these notions in a more extended
form. In the fourth book of the * Restitutio/ he undertook, as
the title intimates, to explain the name of God, the nature of
God, and the principle of all things. Having spoken of the
names Jehovah and Elohim, he unfolds his platonic idea of God.
The original images, or ideas, of all things are in the Almighty.
The forms of all things, which were afterwards to exist, were
A. D. 1554.] SYSTEM OF SERVETUS. 251
present to his wisdom from eternity. Wise men of all ages have
taught this truth, and the holy Scripture itself, according to its
design. Plato, who seems to have studied Moses, and who was
familiar with the wise men of earlier times, and therefore stood
higher than Aristotle, expounded it. He regarded ideas not as
mere notions in God, but as the actual images of the things, to
which God gave life, according to his good pleasure, and through
the light of his being. Thus it is conceivable, how a resplendent
image of the future Christ, without any change of his own being,
might originate in God from eternity. In this last development
of Deity, Servetus proceeds from a pantheistic point of view,
which is not the doctrine of Plato. According to that philoso-
pher, matter, or chaos, was separated from God. In the eternal
being of God, which, it is probable, had ceased to be contem-
plated in its personality, there are numberless forms, and the
ideas of all things. God himself is the essence and the source
of all : unnumbered beings rest in Him. This essence of God
takes all forms ; and Servetus speaks of an omniformis Dei es-
sentia. But with all this manifoldness, there is in God but one
modus, the principle of all life, of all light, of all spirit, — a divine
modus of the fulness of the substance, without limit, in the spirit
and body of Jesus Christ. The modus in him is twofold. Hence
the discourse is of two persons ; the appearance in the Word,
and the communication in the Spirit ; other things, both spiritual
and corporeal, being created thereby. This is the eternal thought
of God concerning things, and their representation, by form
and matter. From this root all things arise. There are similar
divine modes in the angels and in men, and even in individual
things. The Godhead dwells in all, but all spring from Christ.
This doctrine is represented as that of Scripture, but it is much
more that of the Greeks and Orientals, and after them of the
Rabbins, in their theory of the soul of the world. Thus the
archetype of the world is described as in God, and the wisdom
of God is the Logos. The archetypes spoken of are not merely
images, but substantial forms.
Hence we find that Servetus was a realist, and he represents
knowledge according to the Platonic theory. Thus objects
formed according to the original patterns, re-awaken in the soul
its innate ideas. The fountain of all light is in the Logos ; his
light is the formative principle of all things. In his doctrine of
God, Servetus firmly asserts the principle, that God is incom-
prehensible to the creature, except as lie reveals himself in the
252 SYSTEM OF SERVETUS. [CHAP. V.
Word and in the Spirit. The Logos is Ideal in God, and no
Person. The Word is God himself, the whole God. In the
representation of the Logos. Servetus employed no settled or
definite language. Logos, with him, is the divine thought and
speech, identical with the divine will. The eternal thought and
will of the person of Christ are the organ of divine revelation.
So far as all other divine thoughts are gathered together in the
one divine thought, the Logos appears as the Ideal world, which
may be represented as the divine understanding. Lastly, Servetus
advocates, in his concluding work, the ideality of the divine
understanding itself. The revelation of God in Christ fills the
intermediate space between God and the creature. In the man
Christ the Logos is hypostatically present. The union with God
is also become possible to the angels. Of the Holy Ghost, it is
said, that He is the communication of the divine essence, which
proceeds from Christ after the resurrection.
In all this we recognize a philosophical system in embryo,
which never probably would have been brought to maturity ; for,
on the one side, Servetus stumbled on dialectic difficulties, and
on the other, the free course of his speculations was hindered by
the element of Christian piety. If he had understood himself,
as a philosopher, and had kept his aim steadily in view, he would
have described Christ, in relation to God^ as God reducing him-
self within the limits of personality, which was what in reality
he always meant. But his system appears as a mass of defective
Christian notions on the work of redemption, mixed up with a
certain measure of Platonism. Since Christ however, according
to him, is a person, God cannot properly be so ; for a twofold
personality would as little agree with his theory as a three-
fold.
In the fourth book on the Trinity, in the ' Restitutio/ Servetus
proceeds from the original forms, to the origin, of all things. We
shall speak briefly of his doctrine of creation. He combines
religion and natural theology, and illustrates the one from the
other. Light is the ground of all things. God is light; and in
this light of the Godhead did Christ appear, as the sun in the
midst of created light. He was therefore the first creation of
God. The various characteristics of different bodies arise from
the light, which mingles itself with them. Heat and cold rule
in nature ; but both the one and the other derive their essence
and power from light. The light of the sun warms, and the
watery rays, which are collected in some of the planets, in the
A.D. 1554.] SYSTEM OF SERVETUS. 253
moon, in Saturn, and other parts of the heavens, diffuse cold.
All this has the Architect of the world, the resplendent character
of the divine essence, that is, Christ, accomplished by means of
light. All exists by him : he created the elements, and after-
wards imparted to each a portion of the light which is in him-
self. All which takes place in nature, as well as in the kingdom
of grace and in the conversion of mankind, is wrought by light.
God, at the beginning, created, out of nothing, two heavens,
the earth, and the light. Hence all other things arose : the water
first, from the water of heaven, and the air. The air and the
light generated fire. The doctrine of Thales is said to be correct ;
the earth was prior to the heavens. God created air and a watery
heaven. Further : there is an uncreated heaven, a heaven of air
in God and Christ. This is the third heaven, of which Paul
speaks. There is air in the water and in the fire, a heavenly as
well as an earthly material, a principle hitherto unknown to all
the philosophers of the world. There are four fundamental
principles of all things ; two material and two formal : — 1. Water
and earth : 2. The sun-light, which warms, and the watery ray,
which creates cold.
The ancients taught rightly, that all things are one, since all
exist in God. God is everywhere, because the light of God is
in all things : God is in all beings, even in wicked spirits : all
things are an effluence of the divine essence, but all things are
not a certain species of the Godhead, or parts of God ; since,
except in regard to the matter of heavenly light, they are earthly,
and altogether separate from God.
Servetus, on account of his pantheistic expressions, has been
characterized as a forerunner of Spinoza. This is very unjust;
his Christian feeling raised him far above Spinoza, while he was
singularly unlike him in the obscurity of his reasoning. Spirit
and matter, according to him, are not necessarily opposed. He
acknowledged a creation out of nothing, by the free-will of God,
and he pronounced a curse upon those who assert an unchange-
able destiny or law. Man he represents as perfectly free, which
alone would be sufficient to exonerate him from partaking in the
errors of Spinoza. But since he allows not the creation of the
world, as separate from God, the world being imperfect, he is
in this respect altogether opposed to Christianity. The natural
philosophy of Servetus, and his belief, go always hand in hand,
and he availed himself of his experience as a physician to il-
lustrate the operation of grace, and the divine government. He
254 SYSTEM OF SERVETUS. [CHAP. V.
admits of the existence of angels, but only as a breath of God.
Of the evil spirit, as a personal being, he frequently speaks, but
without especial definition.
This leads us to the notion of Servetus on the fall of man. In
the two dialogues on the Trinity, and in the 3rd, 6th and 7th
books of the ( Restitutio/ mention is made of the fall, of angels,
of punishment in hell, and of salvation. He here expresses the
fine idea, which occurs also in Calvin, that through the sin of the
first man all the world sunk, and even the stars became unclean.
Nowhere however does he speak of the ruin of mankind, and
of their condemnation, as grounded, according to the Christian
doctrine, on the knowledge of sin. Man, he asserts, can be pre-
pared for good works without being born again of the spirit.
This was the first cause of his errors, of his haughty intractable
character, and of his perverse conduct. Here and there how-
ever expressions occur, respecting the corruption of the human
race, which have a pious and orthodox sound. The devil is
spoken of as sin dwelling in us, as sickness and death. In a
similar manner also he speaks of the tree of knowledge. But
these passages are contradicted by others. Original sin is repre-
sented as a mere sickness, and as unconnected with guilt. Man
is subjected to bodily death, not to spiritual, for he is without
guilt ; he is not condemned to hell, but, so to speak, is left in
school, or the place of the dead, till he arrive at the age of know-
ledge, that is, his twentieth year. He who sins after this exposes
himself to both bodily and spiritual death. Thus Servetus ne-
cessarily rejected infant-baptism.
The view which he took of redemption is evident from his
doctrine of the nature of Christ : much is said on this subject
in his two dialogues on the Trinity, which form the sixth and
seventh books of the f Restitutio,' and in which Michael and Peter
are introduced conversing with each other. In the second dia-
logue he seeks to show, as he states, in what manner Christ was
begotten of God. Christ is no creature (these words must be un-
derstood in his own sense : He is eternal as thought) : his power
has no end: He is worthy of worship, and is the true God.
Such expressions even as these occur : " The soul of Christ is
God ; the flesh of Christ is God ; the spirit of Christ is God."
But the human nature is disregarded, and that he erred in this
respect was viewed as his greatest offence. Thus Calvin, while
he was in prison, made this a cause of accusation against him ;
and in his sentence it is stated, "that he wickedly destroyed
A.D. 1554.] SYSTEM OF SERVETUS. 255
Christ's humanity, the main source of consolation to poor,
perishing mankind."
It has been already shown, how he despised and blasphemed
the doctrine of the church respecting the incarnation, or the
union of the divine with the human principle. On the other
hand, he speaks in the following manner on the human nature
of Christ, and on his generation. The Logos was the paternal
seed : a part of the spirit of God, and a part of light, which is
Deity itself, passed into the holy Virgin, and a part of her blood
mingled therewith. This earthly part of the mother became
visible : therefore the blood of Christ, the flesh of Christ, the
soul of Christ, is God himself. This Christ is no creature : God
himself and the fulness of God dwell in Him. As Servetus
would not acknowledge the eternity of the Son of God, but yet
confessed his divinity according to the Scriptures, he was ob-
liged to view the union of the divine nature with the manhood
of Christ, in such a sense, that the man Christ might be called
God, thus setting aside the personality of God. Three light-
elements of the Father were combined with the blood of the
mother in the generation of the son. Thus in Christ the primal
light of God is mingled with the earthly nature of the mother,
the divine with the human : he is partaker of both natures, con-
substantial with God, ofjLoouaios.
In the second book of the f Restitutio5 he interprets the first
verse of the first chapter of John, and more at length than in his
earlier work. He also expounds the passage, in the first chapter
of the Epistle to the Colossians, in which Christ is described as
the first-born of every creature. The flesh of Christ, the earthly
portion of his being, is older than our flesh ; his body is derived
from the first pure matter, as it existed before sin ; whereas our
bodies are of the impure matter, as it has existed since the
fall. Thus he deified the man in Christ. Calvin remarked this.
He combined the Godhead with the flesh of Christ, mingling
the two natures ; while he separated the flesh of Christ from
ours, as far as heaven from earth. Again, he says, that as,
through the incarnation, the Word became flesh for all creatures,
so, through the resurrection, the flesh ceased to be a creature.
The Word from heaven is now the flesh of Christ : the human
nature of Christ is the same as the divine.
" But what," says Calvin, " will become of our communion
with Christ, and of our salvation, if we thus tear the band asunder
which unites us in brotherly communion with Christ, the only
256 SYSTEM OF SERVETUS. [CHAP. V.
pledge of our adoption ? Christ, according to the apostle, is our
brother; for He was made in all things like unto us, sin only
except. Servetus understands this expression as merely inti-
mating that he had a similar life to ours ; whereas the apostle
speaks of a like nature : and it is evident indeed, that the Son of
God could not have reconciled us to the Father, without atoning
for sins in that which was truly human flesh, not divine, so that
the satisfaction might be accomplished in our own nature. Christ
paid the price of our redemption in his flesh. If his flesh had been
divine, what should we have had to do with the payment ? There
is a union indeed of both natures, but no mingling or confusion
of the two."
According however to the system of Servetus, this divine
Christ is a transient Deity. He had already spoken, in his con-
troversy with (Ecolampadius, of this his notion of Christ, and
he persevered in defending it, asserting that Christ can be called
eternal in no other way than the world is, the idea of which had
existed from eternity in the mind of God. He thus expresses
himself also respecting the end of the world, and with it, of its
Trinity. The person of Christ, consequently, when its work is
finished, will cease to be ; and thus he not only looses the band
which binds us to Him for eternity, but sets aside redemption
itself.
The doctrine of the Holy Ghost is equally defective in the
system of Servetus. He describes the spirit of God as an energy.
In the air which we breathe there is the power of God : He
moves nature thereby. The Holy Ghost however works in-
wardly, enlightens and sanctifies man. Spirit, wind, breath, in-
dicate the outward living energy; the "Holy Ghost" the in-
ward. When God spake, He became God the Spirit: before
He thus breathed, there was no Spirit, and He breathed not till
He spake. Thus Moses says, that the Spirit of God moved the
water. This Spirit, in the Old Testament, was only a shade, a
type ; but in the New Testament He became a certain power of
God, which works in the souls of men ; and hence He is no
longer called the Spirit of the Lord, but the Spirit of God, the
Holy Ghost. He is a movement, which God excites in men ;
and when it is imparted to men through the ministry of angels,
which are only a breath of God, then it is itself also in Scripture
called an angel. The Holy Ghost is a person of the Godhead ;
while, as an angel, He directs the work of God. This Spirit is
a " disposition" in God ; and in this sense we may speak of three
A.D. 1554.] SYSTEM OF SERVETUS. 257
persons in God. At the beginning, however, of this very article
Servetus had indulged himself in his usual ridicule and abuse of
the church doctrine of the Trinity.
This second revelation of God is not distinct from God him-
self, and from the Logos, but only in the form of the manifes-
tation.
According to the last development of his system, Servetus
represents the Spirit, like everything else in the world, as ori-
ginally contained in the Word, that is, in idea and substance^ as
the idea and archetype of all other spirits. The universal Spirit
of God, which fills creation, is properly the soul of the world.
He first appeared perfect in Christ: He assumed the human
nature with the Logos, and formed the soul of Christ. We re-
ceive through regeneration and in the sacrament, the Holy Spirit,
and that by means of the breath of Christ.
If we look now at the church, which the Spirit of God founded,
we shall find that Servetus claimed for it a vast power, which,
although it be hidden, is mightier than all powers, so that angels
and devils must be subject unto it.
To this part of his system belongs his doctrine of justification
by faith, by works, and by Christ. Melancthon wrote to Ca-
merarius, " He is manifestly mad on the subject of justification."
The principal exposition of his doctrine respecting the method
of salvation is found in the second part of the ( Restitutio.' 1.
In the three books on Faith, and on the righteousness of the
kingdom of Christ, which surpasses the righteousness of the
law. 2. In that which treats of the law and the Gospel. 3. In
the description of charity, in its relation to faith and good works.
This is a repetition of his earlier work on Justification. He
shows here especially, that he sought a higher species of faith
than that of either Catholics or Protestants. Lamenting the
depression of Christianity, he says, " No one knows what the
faith of Christ is, or what charity is." His creed was simple
enough : — " The man Christ Jesus is the Son of God, who died
for our salvation." The account which he gives of the manner
in which we arrive at faith is as follows. The understanding
first apprehends all the truths of the Gospel; the heart applies
these truths to itself by the drawing of the Father, or the move-
ment of the Holy Ghost. The mind accordingly receives the
faith, and freely embraces it : it still retains the ability to choose
what is good, and has somewhat of the Godhead : but God must
vol. n. s
258 SYSTEM OF SERVETUS. [CHAP. V.
come to its aid, that it may be able to take advantage of its
freedom. Faith is a fruit of this freedom.
Justification, he says, is the forgiveness of sins : when a man
recognizes Christ as the Son of God and Saviour of the world,
he becomes righteous and is saved. The Gospel stands far
higher than the law : in the Old Testament we have the righte-
ousness of works, and in the New the righteousness of faith ;
but he contends against the so-called extravagance of the Pro-
testant doctrine, which will allow of no reward for works. This
is discussed in the third book of the second part, Be Mercede et
Gloria Differentia, " concerning rewards and the distinction of
glory/- He shows that in the New Testament a certain species of
righteousness becomes available through works, and that the first
justification by faith is followed by a second justification, which
proceeds from the diligence with which a man performs good
works, which God actually rewards. To some interesting; re-
flections, he adds, that salvation comes from faith, but that the
materials of it are good works, for love and good works increase
blessedness : they clothe faith and preserve it alive.
This leads us to the consideration of his views of free-will : it
is characteristic of his peculiar notions, that he felt that, in his
time, the freedom of man was not yet comprehended in its pro-
per mystery. Hence he opposed himself with all his force to
the main doctrine of Calvin, which he designated as that of fate,
or a universal necessity. In the same manner he spoke of the
bondage of the will as a sign of Calvin's stupidity. The re-
former exhorted men to do what he knew they could not do.
"You say a vast deal about free-doings, and say that there is no
free-doing."
In his earlier work on Justification he says, " It is better to
perform good works than to inquire into the causes of good
works ; but as there are many who have little skill in philoso-
phizing, I will here dispense with my philosophy. I believe
that good works have their peculiar origin in free-will, which is
as distinct from faith as it is from charity. There is an operating
Spirit which is higher than any will, or any inward quality, and
which freely brings forth good works. The outward action is
effected by the movement of the heart, which sends its spirits
into the members ; and this action of the free-will is something
more than the resolution of the will, there being more difficulty
in accomplishing than in willing. The meaning of this is: faith
A.D. 1554.] SYSTEM OF SERVETUS. 259
excites charity ; charity the will ; but the higher energy is needed
for this. The energy thus spoken of is superior to the will to do
good. For of what avail would the pious will be, if there were
no power to accomplish its object ? It is this power which brings
with it a reward from God."
Thus Servetus endeavoured to penetrate the depths of free-
will, Calvin and the other reformers being content to comprehend
it in an antithesis. Servetus placed freedom in a certain power
of the heart to effect the conclusions of the will. Sin excites in
the natural man evil desires : faith awakens love and holy de-
sires. There is an ability, however, in the free-will of man to
determine whether he will accomplish his good or evil resolves :
good or evil works, consequently, may be set to his account ; and.
thus we may look for hell or a sublime blessedness.
In the little work on Justification, in which Servetus seeks a
middle path between the old and the new doctrine, he concedes
to Luther, that faith justifies without merit or works ; and to the
Catholic church, that charity and good works may deserve some-
what with God and expect a reward. He contends however
with great severity against the dead works of the monks, and
speaks of faith with as much fervour as Luther, disagreeing with
him only when the discourse refers to free-will and the source of
good works. In the times of the old covenant grace was not
bestowed on men : he who fulfilled the law as well as he could
was righteous : even the holiest men were only righteous in a
natural sense ; they had earthly desires and feared earthly chas-
tisements. This carnal justification was abolished by Christ.
In the new covenant the spirit is justified by faith : to attain it
we must hear Christ, repent, deny and sacrifice ourselves, and
place our whole trust in this, that man has been redeemed by
the blood of Christ, and that by his mercy alone, without any
desert on our own part, we may obtain forgiveness of sin, and
recover our lost spiritual life. Works avail nothing for salvation.
Faith produces charity, and through it we receive the Holy Ghost.
But although faith alone, and without works, justifies us, yet
Christians who act well may expect their reward both in time and
in eternity.
Above all, he says, is obedience acceptable to God ; the sub-
jection, that is, of our understanding to the rule of Christ as the
Son of God. This one command of faith in Christ has God put
in the place of all the law. Through this faith we become
children of God.
s 2
260 SYSTEM OF SERVETUS. [CHAP. V.
The distinction between justification, as viewed by Servetus
and the Reformers, consists in this, that with Servetus it was not
faith in the merits of Christ, without works, which justifies, but
the faith in the Son of God which incites us to good works.
Hence, according to him, the Lutherans could never understand
justification : he wished to give it a practical character.
With this subject is connected the view which Servetus takes
of the means of grace. According to him, the christian church
has three : — the preaching of the Gospel ; baptism ; and the
Lord's Supper. The power of the keys is the power of preach-
ing,— of the exposition of the truth ; while the pope holds the
keys of the abyss. In the doctrine of the sacrament, he sepa-
rates from the Lutherans, whom he designates Impanatores;
from the Zwinglians and Reformed, whom he calls Trojjisten;
and from the Catholics, whom he reviles as Transubstaniiatores.
He rejects the opinions of each and all of these parties, and
adopts a view similar to the Calvinistic doctrine, the idea, that
is, of a spiritual eating. In the order to be remarked in the
several parts of the work of salvation, baptism, with him, is not
the beginning, but the middle point of the course. He would
acknowledge but two sacraments, properly so-called. It appears
remarkable that he should have assailed the use of infant baptism
with such peculiar violence. He even calls it a murdering of
the Holy Ghost ; a desolating of the kingdom of God ; a ruining
of Christianity. This is unintelligible, unless we suppose him to
have altogether rejected the doctrine of original sin, as received
by the church. Servetus however was not properly an anabaptist :
he admitted the power of the civil magistrate ; the duty of obe-
dience, and the lawfulness of oaths : but, on the other hand, he
described adult baptism as alone making men Christians, and
as exalting them above the angels. Prior to this baptism faith
is imperfect : faith justifies, but baptism saves. In the first in-
stance, the preaching of the word must awaken and enlighten
the heart; repentance must then follow; and this will prepare
the man for entering into the kingdom of heaven. There must
be faith in the Son of God, to induce him to come to baptism ;
and for this purpose he is to undergo the proper instruction of
a catechumen. With respect to those who fall after baptism,
no further baptism or reconciliation is possible. This is another
reason why children should not be baptized. There is a won-
derful efficacy in this sacrament, as in that also of the Lord's
Supper: they cannot be separated from each other. Baptism
A.D. 1554.] SYSTEM OF SERVETUS. 261
may properly take place in the thirtieth year of a man's
life*.
Unbaptizecl children, nay, even the most excellent men among
the heathens and Jews, cannot enter the kingdom of heaven.
There are habitations prepared for them where they enjoy the
happiness proper to their condition. This leads us to consider
his views of the future state.
Servetus adopts without questioning the doctrine of the im-
mortality of the soul. This is evident from the declaration
which he made at his trial, and from his behaviour at the stake.
It is not so apparent from his works.
In his Defence, written against Melancthon, he advocates the
notion of a purgatory, through which all Christians must pass.
This he calls the baptism by fire. In the end, souls pass away
into the divine vision or idea. This subject is treated of in the
seventeenth letter, in the ( Restitutio/ Again : Servetus con-
tended against Calvin, that the visible body of Christ has no
place in heaven. Calvin answered, that " if the body of the Lord
is in no certain place, the bodies of the saints, after the resur-
rection, which are visible like his, can have no certain place."
Servetus expressed no surprise at this objection, but readily
admitted Calvin's assertion ; adding, " When heaven and earth
shall have passed away, there will be neither time nor place,
neither movement nor being. We shall be inclosed by no space,
but shall exist in the idea or understanding of God." Sola
idea divina nos post resurrectionem continebimur. Christ him-
self will be embraced in the highest idea or understanding of
God, and will thus, without any change of place, be everywhere
present. Sola principe idea divina, ipse princeps continetur, et
per earn est ubique vult, sine locali motu. Everything is derived
from the idea of God, and to that will everything return. There
are ideas and original forms ; they have sprung into life, and
will again become essential.
Servetus admits the doctrine of infernal punishment and
future blessedness. " God himself is the purgatory, Christ the
holy fire." The doctrine of the restoration of all things is stated
in the third part of the e Restitutio, ' where the kingdom of
Antichrist is also spoken of. The sixty signs of Antichrist are
described in the fifth part.
The whole world is fallen through sin, and Christ renews it.
Satan ruined the natural world by Eve, and the spiritual by
* Dc Rugcncratione, passim.
262 SYSTEM OF SERVETUS. [CHAP. V.
the Romish whore, the pope. Servetus here speaks continually
with as great severity against Rome as the Reformers had done.
But he speaks with no less rage against the Protestants, and
especially against Melancthon, whom he addresses, in his e Apo-
logy,' in words which show the entire disorder of his mind.
" You say that the Jews and the Turks do not worship God
aright. But what is the notion you yourself have formed of the
hell-hound? To what a monster do you not pray !J* Calvin is
drunk when he teaches that man has no power of free action,
and yet expects him to act as if he had. You too are drunk,
when you exhort to the true love of God, and at the same time
say that it nowhere exists. But most of all do you show your
error and drunkenness in your belief in the Trinity, in your false
conclusions respecting the two natures, which so drive you into
a corner, that you are compelled to allow that the Holy Ghost
might die in a mule, since you have asserted that your invisible
Son of God died in a man."
The system of Servetus, taken as a whole, gives signs of an
awakened mind, of ability and lofty views ; but it was not the
fruit of a renewed heart. The Holy Spirit speaks a different
language. The power which inspired Servetus taught him not
the wretchedness of sin; hence his pride in opposing what he
did not understand, and his shameless language, unparalleled
in the history of the church, of either ancient or modern times.
The principles, moreover, which he advances, are far more un-
intelligible as speculations than all the deep things of our faith.
Had he developed these creations of his brain scientifically, or
merely for himself, as had been done in other times, he might
have been pardoned ; but when he undertook to establish his
system in the place of that which is evangelical and catholic,
and when the libertines and the Anabaptists were found to take
his part, in order to oppose the Reformation, it was necessary
that his fanaticism should be suppressed. Had this not been
done, the reformation in the South, which, in the midst of the
convulsions which now prevailed, was only supported by the
strongest efforts, must have shared the fate of that of Poland ;
an event which would have been as injurious to the general
progress of the world as to the interests of Lutheranism. It
was Calvin's task to defend the Reformation with the weapons
furnished by the age in which he lived.
263
CHAPTER VI.
OTHEH TEACHERS OF FALSE DOCTRINE RESPECTING THE
TRINITY. MATTHiEUS GR1BALDI. BL AN DRAT A. GENTI-
LIS HIS SYSTEM AND HISTORY.
As we are only concerned with those teachers of error who
stood in special opposition to Calvin, we may pass over the
well-known anabaptist Joris or Georg, who died in 1556, after
having lived unknown twelve years in Basel. According to his
dogma he was the true Christ, and could forgive sin and
condemn the world. He had the Spirit, against which no one
should dare to sin. It was one of the principles of his sect, that
the marriage-vow need not be kept unbroken*.
We must not however neglect to notice the disturbances
which prevailed at this time in the Italian church at Geneva,
and which threatened to prove dangerous to unity of doctrine.
Among the members of the congregation alluded to was the
lawyer, Matthaeus Gribaldi f. Without understanding Servetus,
he declared that one side of his error appeared to him like truth ;
that Christ, according to his human nature, was properly and
truly the Son of God. Thus his views were in reality Socinian.
He supposed that the Father alone was the eternal God ; the
Son being a subordinate God, the first-born among many.
Calvin describes this controversy in an interesting letter to
Georg of Wurtemberg, May 2, 1557 t- It shows that the re-
former merely desired the banishment of heretics, when their
errors were unaccompanied by blasphemy. Gribaldi was exiled.
But the excitement which he had occasioned at Geneva was
not terminated by his removal ; other restless spirits were at
work. At length the elders and ministers of the Italian church
besought the Council that a confession might be drawn up,
* Buchat, t. vi. p. 2[)3, gives his history at length.
t Gribaldi had been a professor at Padua, and witnessed, in 1548, the
horrible despair of the conscience-stricken apostate, Franz Spiera. Not being
safe at Padua, he obtained, through the recommendation of Vergerio, the
appointment to a law-professorship at Tubingen, from the Duke ofWiirtem-
berg. He travelled much about, and on coming to Geneva bought the c-
of Farges in Gex. Calvin warned Wolmar in Tubingen against him.
I Ed. Amst. p. 113, b. Laus. Ep. 238.
264 GRIBALDl's HERESY. [CHAP. VI.
which every member of the congregation should be required to
subscribe. Calvin employed his influence to effect this object :
the several councils favoured the establishment of the rule, and
it became the law *. The Italian church was assembled ; those
who entertained doubts had a conference with Calvin, which
lasted three hours : he convinced them all, and all, with the ex-
ception of five members of the congregation, subscribed the
formulary. Among those who refused was Valentine Gentilis.
Both he and his companions soon after, from fear, left the city.
These circumstances took place in May 1558. The duke of
Wurtemberg subsequently learnt that Gribaldi was engaged in
spreading his heretical opinions on the Trinity in his territories :
he accordingly assembled the divines of Tubingen, to examine
Gribaldi respecting his doctrine. Gribaldi requested time to
prepare his confession ; but he retired secretly from the city, and
withdrew to his country-seat at Farges, in the canton of Bern.
The duke acquainted the authorities at Bern with all which had
taken place : they accordingly summoned Gribaldi before them,
and cast him into prison. The clergy of Bern were desired to
examine his writings : they replied that Gribaldi taught, " that
there are three unequal Gods/5 &c. He had however a con-
ference with them, and subscribed a confession, in which he
acknowledged his errors. Banished from Bern, he was, notwith-
standing, permitted to return to Farges, where he remained to
the end of his days. He died of the plague.
Another heretic, who went to Poland, there to play his part,
and whom Calvin pursued thither with the sword of the Spirit,
was the physician Blandrata. This Italian, having exhibited his
character in Geneva, and been pronounced a heretic by his coun-
tryman Peter Martyr, went, as we have stated, to Poland, and
there acquired an honourable position. " I am not surprised,"
said Calvin t, " that this abandoned man has tried to effect among
you, who indulge in more license than we, what he attempted
among us. But I am deeply affected at learning from your
statement, that many persons among you have been carried away
by this fury. A short time ago a writing was brought to me, in
which Christ is represented as a sort of strange God ; and I wrote
an admonition, which I hope has already reached you. I am
now induced, by your pious encouragement, again to consider
how I may best oppose this continually spreading evil."
* M3. Tig. Oct. 9, 1361. 1 MS. Paris. Calv. Stanislad.
A.D. 1554.] BLANDRATA THE PHYSICIAN. 265
With regard to Blandrata, we learn his history from a notice
sent by the Genevese ministers to the Wilnaer church, and
which was written by Calvin *. The latter, it seems, imagined
that he could see wickedness in the countenance of the man :
" Your very look," he once publicly said to him, " indicates the
monster which you cherish in your heart f." But he warned him
against the secret circulation of his errors, and endeavoured by
frequent conferences to bring him to a better state of mind. All
however was in vain ; Blandrata persevered in his fanaticism,
and threw the Italian congregation at Geneva into fresh excite-
ment. The elders were anxious for quiet. A discussion took
place at which two members of the Council were present. Calvin
explained the circumstances. Blandrata had the rashness to
accuse him of falsehood, but was convinced of his slander. He
stated to an intimate friend, Paul Alciat, that the Genevese wor-
shiped three devils, worse than all the idols of the papists, because
they regarded them as three persons. He left the city with this
companion.
Blandrata was cited before the consistory. Calvin endeavoured
to tranquillize him ; a scene however took place, which was suffi-
ciently comical to provoke even the stern Genevese to laughter.
While Calvin was once holding a discourse, and Blandrata was
present, one of the syndics entered the hall. Blandrata, terrified
by his wicked conscience, believed that the syndic was come to
try him ; putting therefore his handkerchief to his nose as if it
were bleeding, he ran out, and immediately hastened through the
gate of the city, to which he never returned. No thought of
harming him had been entertained. He fled to Zurich, where he
was opposed by Peter Martyr, and thence to Poland. Calvin wrote
a little treatise against him J. Like Gentilis, he separated the
person of Christ from the Father; but he agreed with Gribaldus
in acknowledging the Godhead of Christ, and hence had many
Gods.
We have still to mention some characteristic circumstances
respecting Blandrata. In the introduction to the account of this
man, before quoted, Calvin declares himself ready to be recon-
ciled to him. He treats the matter somewhat ironically; adding,
in his epistle to the church at Wilnaer, which had assembled a
synod, — " Blandrata has received no slight recompense for his
* Ed. Laus. Ep. 322. Ed. Arast. p. I ill, an. 1561.
f MS. Bern. 13 Cal. Dec. 1558.
X Responsum ad Queestiones J. Blandrata?, 1559.
266 BLANDRATA THE PHYSICIAN. [CHAP. VI.
troublesome journey, having gained so great a name. He seemed
worth nothing among other people ; but you admire him, as if
he were an angel fallen from heaven. I do not envy your good
luck. If you distrust my authority in this affair, yet surely the
respectability of the elders of the Italian church, and of that
excellent servant of Jesus Christ, Peter Martyr, will have some
influence with you." This appeal to other authorities we should
certainly not find in Luther in his later years.
It appears, indeed, that Blandrata had met with striking en-
couragement. Calvin praises the Polish Stanislaus, that he was
not hurried away like others, who were ignorantly praising the
heretic. " Know," he says, " that Valentin Gentilis, whose
fanaticism I shortly ago exposed, is of the same party." Felix
Cruciger was at that time in Poland. Stancarus had circulated
accounts in Geneva, accusing even the Polish believers of inclining
to the errors of Arius and Servetus. A synod therefore was
assembled, and a confession of faith was sent to Geneva in order
to clear them of this slander. Calvin highly praised it. They
declare, that they desired always to remain in connexion with
the church at Geneva. (i May a holy union ever prevail between
us!" was Calvin's answer. But how little the volatile Italians
understood the deep mystery of the being of God, and how
fiercely they disputed on the subject, appears from Calvin's
' Admonition' to the brethren in Poland (1563) and from the
following narrative.
Valentin Gentilis was a person of some distinction : he was
a native of Consenza; and sought that peace at Geneva which
he could not find in his own heart. His history, characteristic
of the times, is given partly by Calvin himself, and partly by
Benoit Aretius, a theologian of Bern. Calvin relates to the
Marquis Caraccioli, before-mentioned, and who so wisely sepa-
rated himself from the frivolous spirits by which he was sur-
rounded, the excitement which had been caused in the Italian
church, and adds, that Valentin had persevered in diffusing his
poison, but was now in prison. He describes him " as deceitful
and disloyal," and says " he kept a school for secretly dissemi-
nating his errors, which are in one respect as detestable as those
of Servetus ; they are, in fact, the same. I know not what will
be the issue ; but the beginning greatly distresses me."
Gentilis asserted, that all power ought to be ascribed to God
the Father, who communicated his might to the other two per-
sons ; so that he admitted three persons and essences, and
A.D. 1554.] HERESY OF GENTILIS. 267
consequently three Gods, eternal, almighty, and infinite. He
openly acknowledged this doctrine, and declared that his con-
science compelled him to teach it. But notwithstanding this,
he had subscribed the Confession of the Italian church, which
concludes in the following terms : " We approve, receive, and
confirm all these articles, asserting that he who does otherwise
is perjured and perfidious." While in prison, Gentilis drew up
a short account of his belief. The Council desired that it should
be stated more at full. He then confessed, that (i if the Father,
Son, and Holy Ghost were to be acknowledged as equal in the
divine essence, a fourfold personality ought to be admitted ;
since the divine essence was in itself, without any consideration
of persons, the true God." The Father alone, he said, expresses
the divine essence. The Word is ' the brightness of his glory '
and ' the express image of his being/ distinct from the Father,
He alone being the true God. Again, " The Word is the Son,
and therefore truly God ; and yet they are not two Gods, but
one and the same."
The clergy frequently visited him, with the desire of inducing
him to explain his views ; but in vain. He wished to answer
them in writing. He accordingly composed an apology, com-
plaining that after he had come so far to see Calvin, of whom
he had heard so much, he should be subjected to persecution.
Endeavouring to support his opinions by scholastic reasoning,
he concluded with a quotation from Melancthorv's " Loci," and
with several from Irenaeus and Tertullian. Calvin answered him,
in the name of the ministers, confuting every point in his argu-
ment. Valentin requested the assistance of an advocate, " that
his innocence might not be oppressed by the power of the man
and the volubility of his tongue ;" because " I openly acknow-
ledge that I cannot, with a good conscience, adopt his four-
fold personality in God." In other respects he expressed him-
self prudently, avoiding whatever was blasphemous. His trial
therefore exhibited a great contrast to that of Servetus, whose
shameless blasphemy alone was the cause of his condemnation.
Gentilis declared, "that he desired to submit himself altogether
to the consistory ; and that, as so many agreed in pronouncing
him wrong, he would rather believe them, even though they
dreamed, than himself, though awake." He entreated the favour
of the Council; praised Calvin, and acknowledged his deserts.
But there was something strange in this retractation for the
judges. They felt that he was jesting witli them, and that they
2G8 HERESY OF GENTILIS. [CHAP. VI.
understood little of his real meaning. Five jurisconsults were
therefore called to their aid, and they were asked what punish-
ment was due to him according to the law. The lawyers answered,
that, according to the imperial law, he ought to be condemned
to the flames. Upon hearing this, the members of the council,
on the 15th of August 1558, sentenced him to be beheaded.
But the affair now took another direction. The lawyers soon
felt regret that they had spoken so strongly, and prayed the
Council to defer the execution of the sentence till the state of
the man's soul could be more clearly determined. The Council
was well-content to receive this application, and the milder sen-
timents which prevailed plainly indicate the transition to better
times. Gentilis was re-examined, and he stated his belief in
more cautious terms. " I must acknowledge," he said, " that
when I made my first confession, my zeal so carried me away,
that I would willingly have endured any punishment for the
sake of establishing my doctrine. But after I had many times
carefully perused the answer given me by the consistory, and
which appeals so distinctly to fundamental principles, it pleased
the Father of mercies, who allowed me to wander for a time in
doubt, to bring me to the knowledge of my error, which rests
upon three false supports. In the first place, I was wrong in
not observing that, while I asserted that the one only God of
Israel is the Father of our Lord, the Godhead of the Son, of the
Father, and of Jesus Christ, was excluded by this contrast of
one peculiar God. Secondly, when I viewed the being of God,
independently of the persons, I insisted upon a fourfold perso-
nality ; which was erroneous ; since the essence can be seen only
in the three persons, each of which has the whole essence in
himself. My third error consisted in the assertion, that the
person of the Father is sophistical ; which is false, as has been
proved to me. Upon these three rotten foundations I built
many false consequences, which I now condemn." He expressed,
moreover, his grief that he had caused any trouble to the church,
and that he had answered Calvin, that great theologian, so
thoughtlessly. So also he stated his hope that the ministers
would receive him, the lost sheep, into the bosom of the
church again ; and he prayed that, as they had mercy on his
soul, so they would also consider his bodily necessities, for that
he had now been six months in prison, and was poor and sick.
He appended a formal renunciation of his errors, and a pure
confession of the truth.
A.D. 1554.] HERESY OF GEXTILIS. 2G9
Calvin declared, that, although he saw full well that as soon
as Gentilis was free he would return to his errors, and that no-
thing was to be expected of so deceitful a man, they had no wish
to resist the mercy of the judges, but would silently acquiesce in
their decision.
In the report of the trial it is stated, " that Gentilis had been
apprehended on account of his heresy ; that although he had
subscribed the confession of the Italian church, he had fallen
back into error; that while in prison he had resisted all admo-
nitions, remaining hardened in his impiety and in his blasphe-
mous assertion, that we have four Gods, two Fathers, and a
Turkish God ; but that at length he had manifested repent-
ance." The sentence is remarkable for the time. " Although,"
it says, " thou didst well deserve, for thy wickedness, to be
destroyed from among men, we desire, having regard to thy re-
pentance and conversion, to act towards thee with mercy rather
than severity. We therefore sentence thee, Valentin Gentilis,
to be stripped to the shirt, and, with naked feet and bare head,
and with a lighted torch in thy hand, to kneel before us, and
beseech the judges to pardon thee, acknowledging that thou hast
wickedly diffused a false, heretical doctrine, and expressing thine
abhorrence of the writings in which thou hast taught it. And
we command thee to cast with thine own hand these thy writings
into the fire here kindled, that, being full of dangerous lies, they
may be burnt to ashes. And in order to prove thy repentance
more fully, we command that thou be led through the streets of
the city, with the sound of trumpets, and we forbid thee to de-
part the city. We desire that this may be an example to those
who might attempt things like to thine."
The sentence thus passed upon Gentilis was executed Sep-
tember 2, 1558. He burned his writings, and exhibited pro-
found humility and grief. All present were astonished ; and he
besought the Council, with many prayers, to allow him to leave
the prison without his being obliged to find security, which his
poverty, living as he did upon alms, might render impossible.
The council graciously acceded to his request ; and he declared
with an oath, that he would not depart the city.
But all this was done in mockery. Gentilis no sooner found
himself at liberty than he set out, and took the nearest road to
his friend Gribaldi, now at his country-seat at Farges. Two
other Italians followed him, — Paul Aleiat and the physician
Blandrata. We may easily conceive how these four Italians
270 HERESY OF GENTILIS. [CHAP. VI.
discussed, in their retirement, the doctrine of the Trinity, and
Calvin's vocation. Gentilis became more confirmed in his error
than ever, and went to France for the purpose of spreading it.
While with Gribaldi he had drawn up a confession of faith, in-
troducing many abusive expressions against Athanasius and his
creed, and also against Calvin. He had the folly to dedicate
this work to Simon Wurstenberger, landvogt (bailiff) of Gex, as
if he entertained the same sentiments. Having done this, he
went to Lyons to give the document to the printer. He was
apprehended, but liberated the moment it was known that
he had written something against Calvin. The report of his
trial was now published, and with it an address to the'Lyonnese.
Gentilis went to Poland. Driven from thence, with other Anti-
trinitarians, he visited Siebenburgen, Hungary and Moravia.
He fell into the mistake of supposing that it was Calvin only,
and not the principles of the age which were opposed to his
system. Returning to Switzerland, he knocked at the door of
his friend in Farges, to repose awhile under his roof; but Gri-
baldi had died a short time before of the plague.
The rash and foolish man now ventured to address himself to
the bailiff of Gex, and expressed his desire to hold a disputation
at which all the clergy of the neighbourhood might be present.
The notice which was issued purported, that " if any one wished
to defend the doctrine of Calvin, he should present himself in
eight days to dispute with him (Gentilis), under the condition
that he who could not support his opinions by God's word
should be beheaded as a deceiver; and that if there were none
to accept this challenge, the landvogt and the council of the city
should solemnly declare, that the doctrine of Gentilis respecting
God, the Father, Son and Holy Ghost, was the orthodox doc-
trine/' The landvogt, who had been already greatly offended
with Gentilis for having dedicated his confession of faith to him,
which had created injurious suspicions at Bern, gave directions
for his apprehension. The magistrates of Bern ordered that
he should be forthwith brought to the city ; and a process was
commenced against him, which lasted through a month. He
confessed his belief with the greatest firmness. The ministers
of Bern, and Beza, who was present, endeavoured to bring him
back to the truth ; but he obstinately persisted in his heresy and
in his insufferable abuse of the Trinity. Some books were found
in his possession which he had written on the subject, and dedi-
cated to the King of Poland ; and as he had broken his oath at
A.D. 1554.] HERESY OF GENTIL1S. 271
Geneva, he was sentenced to be beheaded, that he might cause
no further trouble to the church. He continued to reiterate his
blasphemies to the last. The sentence was executed at Bern, in
the year 1566, that is, two years after the death of Calvin.
The system of Gentilis, whose chief error is stated on the title-
page of the work which Calvin published against him*, can only
here be glanced at. To avoid repetitions, we shall merely men-
tion that he could not comprehend the relation of the Son to the
Father. Thus he sometimes separated the Son from the Godhead,
so that he was no longer the true God ; and sometimes, again, he
divided the essence of God from the persons, and converted the
Trinity into a quaternity, rendering the whole subject contempt-
ible. At length he admitted three eternal Almighty Godheads,
because he could not comprehend the inward and outward rela-
tions of the persons. Calvin concluded his work against him,
and his argument for the faith in the true God, with the sublime
expressions of Gregory of Nazianzum : — " I cannot think of the
One without being dazzled with the splendour of the Three : nor
can I acknowledge the Three without feeling my soul at the in-
stant beaming back upon the Unity."
John Paul Alciat de la Motte, a Piedmontese nobleman, was
summoned in the course of this agitation before the tribunal at
Genevaf . He left the city, and wrote to the Council, " that he
thanked them for the right of citizenship which they had bestowed
upon him, and which he now resigned back into their hands ; that
there was some one among them whom he would for his own
sake take care not to name, who persecuted, and laid snares for
him. He besought the pious magistrates to judge between them."
This letter was very unfavourably received. The Council sa-
tisfied itself however with pronouncing Alciat's perpetual banish-
ment as a schismatic, heretic, and companion of the devil. When
he heard that he had been summoned by sound of trumpet to
appear in the city and undergo his trial, he sent in a confession
of faith, in which he owned Christ as the true God, and rejected
the notion of a plurality of gods as impious.
As the error of which we have been speaking was now, through
the instrumentality of Blandrata, Gentilis, Alciat and others,
established in Poland, Calvin despatched two brief addresses
* " L'Irapietc de Valentin Gontil apertement descouverte et descripte, leqncl
enseigne ce blaspheme plein de sacrilege que Jesus Christ est un Dieu qui a
prins son essence d'ailleurs."
f Archives de la Republique.
272 CALVIx's ADDRESS TO THE POLES. [CHAP. VT.
to be circulated in that country*. This leads us to mention the
heresy of Stancarus, who was involved in the chief errors of the
time, and formed a striking contrast to Osiander, of whom he
had been the colleague. His principal dogma referred to the
mediatorship of Christ, but it was closely connected with the
doctrine of the Trinity, the relation of the Father to the Son
being in neither case comprehended. Since Christ as Mediator
is subordinate to the Father, Stancarus sought to represent
Him as less than the Father : being Mediator only in so far as
He is man, many came to view the Father only as God.
It appears from several letters f that Calvin's admonition was
for some time, either through negligence or treachery, suppressed ;
and when the Poles wished for other writings, he refused to grant
their request. This is said also of his little work against Stan-
carus, in which he especially attacks his error on the character
of Christ as Mediator. " I praise your zeal," he says in a letter
to Trecius, ci but it is my duty to remark, that I do not cast my
writings to the wind for sport. Nay, the less I am endued with
foresight, the more timid am I, and the more watchful must I be
of my safety." Christopher Trecius, who was returning from Hei-
delberg to Poland, wished Calvin to give him letters for those
who had been led astray by Stancarus. But he also refused to
write to the Hospodar of Wallachia and Moldavia. It was in the
year 1563, and he alleged his bodily weakness as an apology. In
a letter to Stanislaus Sarnicius J, written the same year, a threat
is expressed against Gregorius Paulus, a preacher at Cracow,
who had become involved in the Antitrinitarian controversy.
Francis Stancarus, a well-known disputant of those times, was
a native of Mantua. He had been invited to Cracow as a teacher
of Hebrew§ ; but he was obliged to leave that city, and joining
Felix Cruciger, he went to diffuse his notions in other parts of
Poland. Calvin's writings had at that time exercised the most
happy influence in the country. Stancarus, who had advanced
the erroneous opinion that Christ is our Mediator, not in his di-
vine but only in his human nature, was condemned by the sen-
tence of a synod in 1554. He still however ventured to visit Po-
land. Lismannius accusedhim of Sabellianism. He now travelled
into Hungary and Siebenburgen, where, at Clausenburg, a confes-
* Thcso addresses were, first, the Admonition " ad Fratres Polonos," and
secondly, an Kpistle to the Polish Nobles of Cracow.
f MS. Paris. Calv. Jacobo Silvio. Ibid. Calv. Christoph. TYccio.
; MS. Gen. Sept. 13, 1563.
§ Salig. Gesch. der Augsburg Confession. Thl. ii. s. 572.
A.D. 1554.] FRANCIS STANCARUS. 273
sion was drawn up in opposition to his doctrine of Christ's Media-
torship ; and, as he belonged to the Reformed, the confusion was
hereby rendered greater than before. After a colloquy with the
Lutheran ministers, and much excitement, he withdrew. At last
this wrangler went to Konigsberg, where he became professor of
theology and Hebrew. The controversy between Osiander, Mor-
lin and Staphylus, on justification, was then at its height. Stan-
carus could not long retain his position in Konigsberg, and on
his departure he described Osiander, in a rash farewell address
to the duke, as an Antichrist and a blood-hound. He now as-
sumed the office of a teacher at Frankfort, where he created such
disturbance, that Melancthon was obliged to be summoned to
restore order. Stancarus had assailed him among the rest, and
accused him of Arianism*. The Genevese church declared
itself especially opposed to the errors which this Italian taught.
Calvin has described this controversy in a little treatise on the
subject f.
With regard to justification, Stancarus, from the desire to
suppress every idea of communion with Christ, founds the whole
work of our reconciliation to God on the sufferings of our Lord's
human nature. We find the opposite error in Osiander, who sepa-
rated justification from the forgiveness of sins, denied the satis-
faction effected by the sufferings of Christ, and insisted that we
are justified and sanctified through the living apprehension of
Christ himself {.
Melancthon and Calvin expressed themselves strongly against
these views. Osiander complained that people contented them-
selves with an imputed righteousness, and that, though the
death of Christ might indeed be our redemption, it was not our
justification. His doctrine, he believed, would triumphantly ex-
alt the practical element of Christianity. The visible Christ, his
works, his sufferings, are not sufficient of themselves to make us
righteous: the inward, the actual essential Christ, alone avails
for this. He denies the influence of the satisfaction, and argues
that the life, which is in the actual Christ, accomplishes the most.
Christ is the righteousness or holiness of God himself; and con-
sequently we are inwardly justified by Him, and outwardly also
by his love, which is the fulfilling of God's law. But it is not faith
* MS. Paris, without date.
t Responsum ad Fratres Polonos, quomodo Mediator sit Chiistus ad refu-
tandum errorem Stancari. 1560.
X Planck describes his system, /. c. s. 2G7.
VOL. II. T
2?4 FRANCIS STANCARUS. [CHAP. VII.
which justifies : it is the righteousness of Christ, which we ap-
prehend through Christ himself. Calvin thus expresses himself
against Osiander in a letter to Melancthon* : "I have always
numbered him among our disgraces." He speaks equally strongly
on the subject of his doctrine. Having accused him of ambition,
he says, " He exalts to the highest degree the shadowy notion
of an actual righteousness, allowing nothing to the free accept-
tance on the side of God, as if that were a subordinate conse-
quence."
Osiander confounded regeneration with justification. He says
that we are not so justified by the obedience of Christ, and the
satisfaction which He rendered, as we are through his divine
and eternal righteousness. Altogether different is the statement
of the Apostle, who simply declares that we are made righteous
by the obedience of one man.
Having thus described the two obstinate controversies on pre-
destination and on the doctrine of the Trinity, it still remains
for us to consider that which originated in the theories advanced
respecting the Lord's Supper. Calvin here displayed his earnest
zeal for the unity of the church ; and this controversy, through
the direction which it received from circumstances, became the
most important of all others in reference to the church's progress
and development.
CHAPTER VII.
calvin's controversy with westphal and hesshuss on
the doctrine of the sacrament. rise and progress
of the dispute. parties engaged. results.
The agreement in doctrine established between the Swiss and
the Genevese extended their influence to France, England, Scot-
land, and Holland. In the same manner, the union between Me-
lancthon and Calvin on the subject of the sacrament secured the
peace of the Protestant church ; and there was every reason to
expect its continuance, till Westphal, Hesshuss, and some others,
designedly created a breach, and thus aroused the holy indig-
nation of Calvin. This old controversy acquires a fresh interest
* Ep. 141, 1552.
A.D. 1554.] SACRAMENTAL CONTROVERSY. 275
through the circumstance that voices even in the present day are
again raised, and with fiery zeal, in favour of the original Lutheran
doctrine of the sacrament. This may produce a schism, even-
tually destructive to the church.
That which was so calculated to excite Calvin's anxiety was
evidently the prospect of the indescribable evils which threatened
the church through these proceedings in Germany. In the case
of a man like Luther, he could forgive anything, even when he
most fiercely assailed the doctrine of Zwingli, and rent the church.
But Westphal manifestly awakened the strife from an ignorant
love of disputation ; and Calvin, in order to bridle him, threatened
him with the fire, but of a kind altogether different from that
which consumed Servetus. Calvin's main effort had ever been
to establish concord between the two great parties in the church:
he had placed himself in the midst that he might bind them
together*.
The Lutherans since the year 1536, when the Wittenberg Con-
cordia was established, had remained satisfied with the funda-
mental idea of the true bodily presence of Christ in the sacrament.
They regarded particular definitions of the manner in which He
is present as unnecessary. Melancthon himself had in some
degree relinquished the notion of a local presence, to give more
force to the spiritual. Luther, indeed, had again begun to rage
against the Swiss, but the silence of his party only tends to show
more remarkably the existence of a union of belief between the
churches themselves. The Zurich " Consensus" seemed finally
to adjust the matter. In the apprehension of the mystery in-
volved in the sacrament, of which he said that it exceeded the
powers of his understanding, Calvin showed that he possessed as
profound a sense as Luther.
In the new formulary, which Calvin persuaded the Swiss to
adopt, it was expressly stated, " that there is an actual par-
taking of the body of Christ in the sacrament ; that a perceptible
strength is imparted to the soul of the communicant, from the
substance of the body of Christ ; and that its operation is incom-
prehensible,— a miracle." But this was followed by a most wicked
love of strife ; and when the main question was settled, there
still remained the collateral inquiry, so difficult to be settled, as
to how Christ is present in the sacrament, and which it was
* See Planck, On the Separation and- Reunion of Parties in the Christian
Church, s. 127 ; and his work Ueber den Protestantischen Lehrbegriff, Bd. v.
Thl. ii.
T 2
2?6 SACRAMENTAL CONTROVERSY. [CHAP. VII.
only necessary to urge, to destroy the peace of the church.
Westphal endeavoured to prove that this inquiry was of the
utmost importance ; and he evinced thereby how little he cared
about Christianity itself, and how much was necessary to satisfy
his own ambition. As a vain disputant on the mysteries incom-
prehensible to Calvin, he exposed himself to be branded with the
mark of his true character, and to the anathemas of the church.
Calvin never exhibited his prudence more conspicuously per-
haps than in this controversy. He stood between two parties,
each violently excited against the other, ready to pervert every ex-
pression which was uttered, and one of which was utterly averse
to peace. He engaged his whole ability in the struggle ; and
most people will probably be inclined rather to admire his
moderation at the commencement of the controversy, than to
accuse him of bitterness.
The expressions used by Calvin and Peter Martyr had long
since aroused the attention of the sterner Lutherans. Westphal
commenced the attack with a little pamphlet in the year 1552:
in this work he summoned the Lutherans to the field, and it is
evident that he had no other object but that of embroiling both
parties in a conflict. He enumerates twenty-eight different in-
terpretations of the consecrating words in the Lord's Supper, and
on which the Sacramentarians were opposed to each other. This
was a striking evidence, he said, of error; but the Lutherans, he
added, had always persevered in asserting one meaning. In con-
clusion he declared, and with great violence of expression, that
the blasphemies of the Sacramentarians ought to be resisted by
the power of the magistrate rather than by the pen.
When the Swiss were now silent from regard to Christian feel-
ing, and the Lutherans, Flaccius, Amsdorf, Wigand, and Mbrlin,
were otherwise occupied, Westphal appeared again with a new
pamphlet written against the Sacramentarians at Magdeburg.
In this production he summoned the Lutherans to unite to de-
fend their doctrine, everywhere oppressed by Zwinglianism, now
spreading on all sides. Bullinger delivered two discourses, in
which he treated this subject with the greatest earnestness. Viret
also this year translated into Latin a very comprehensive work,
written some time before in French : he soon after wrote two other
works on the Lord's Supper*. It was at this juncture that Mary
ascended the throne of England, and commenced the persecution
* Ruchat, vi. 6, 7, 8. Hospinian, p. 383.
A.D. 1554.] SACRAMENTAL CONTROVERSY. 277
of the Protestants. A reformed congregation in London, whose
minister was John a Lasco, was obliged instantly to disperse, its
members seeking safety by flight. Laski, a native of Poland, who
enjoyed Calvin's profoundest respect, and was a truly noble and
enlightened man, had been originally nominated to the richest
bishoprics in his own country and in Hungary ; but he had
resigned all to become a minister of the reformed congregation
at Emden, and to teach the simple truth of the Gospel. To avoid
signing the Interim, he had proceeded in the reign of Edward
VI. to London, and there established a congregation which had
now four ministers.
Laski, when the persecution commenced, embarked in Septem-
ber 1553 with 175 persons. The ship was wrecked in a storm.
Laski ran into the harbour of Elsinore. It was winter, but the ex-
iles received command immediately to re-embark, and to proceed
to the German coast*. Even the women, with children at their
breasts, were not allowed to wait for calmer weather. Force was
quickly employed to drive them into the ship, or beyond the bound-
ary-line, and this in spite of all their prayers to be allowed to re-
main to the end of winter f. Even in Germany they were treated
as enemies of the country and of the church. Westphal called
the members of Laski's exiled community, the devil's martyrs.
Bugenhagen refused to acknowledge them as Christians, and they
were told that papists could be better endured than they. Laski's
children only were allowed to remain in Hamburg till the spring.
The hatred of the Lutherans pursued the wanderers not only
in that city, but also in Lubeck and Rostock. At length they
found refuge in Danzig ; and Laski himself was honourably en-
tertained at Emden, through the influence of the Countess Anna
of Oldenburg. Gustavus Vasa also invited him to Sweden.
We learn from these circumstances that the Lutherans had
but half escaped from the trammels of the Catholic spirit ; and
that the feeling still prevailed among them, that their own
church was the sole source of salvation ; — a fanatical error which
still exhibits its force in the new Lutheran communities.
A great number of frantic Lutheran preacher.- branded the
exiles with the name of heretics, and thus excited the populace
against them. They were also decried as anabaptists by the
* Krasinski, Geschichte der Reformation in Polen. London, L841.
f Uttehhoven gave an accounl of the Bufferings of these exiles. The narra-
tive was preceded by a preface from the pen of a Lac - Pontoppi-
dan's Annalen, Thl. iii. s. 317. '24.
278 SACRAMENTAL CONTROVERSY. [CHAP. VII.
clergy; and the magistrates were therefore compelled to deny
them a place of shelter. This angry zeal exhibited itself in a man-
ner which proved clearly that it had been nourished in secret
before it actually broke forth.
Calvin first received the melancholy tidings through Peter
Martyr, in a letter from Strasburg, May 9, 1554. He could now
no longer remain silent,and he at oncehurled his lightnings against
the false protestant ministers*. Disposed originally to use gentle
means, he wrote to Caspar Liser, in August 1554, — " I rejoice to
see that you approve of my efforts to heal the schism, which has,
alas ! attended the revival of the Gospel ; but we must meet this
rebellious spirit with mildness, and thus prevent the fire from
spreading far and wide around." He expresses himself with
similar moderation in an answer to Sulzer at Basel f; and with
the same object in view, he dedicated his Commentary on Genesis
to the sons of the Duke, John Frederic, of Saxony, hoping to
convince them of the necessity of opposing the Catholics by a
union established on the true principles of peace and concord.
At the end of March he wrote to Bullinger, stating that the
brethren from France were flocking into Geneva, with the inten-
tion of keeping Easter there ; as if they knew nothing of the pre-
vailing agitation, or of the guard posted at all the barriers. He
also expressed his thanks for the sermons published by Bullinger,
and for the honourable mention of himself, inquiring at the same
time, whether Bullinger would oppose Westphal? Beza drew his
attention to this man ; and added, that he might be put down in
three days J.
The condition of Laski greatly affected Calvin. Addressing
him, he says, " The cruel conduct of Denmark affects me bitterly.
Great God ! what an instance of barbarity among a Christian
people ! It surpassed even the fury of the waves." He praised
a Lasco's moderation and firmness. Some strong expressions
respecting the king of Denmark follow : — " The more I have
celebrated his zeal and friendship, the more distressed do I feel
at discovering that this was a false and useless display of mild-
ness. But I see that a devilish frenzy has seized the whole of
that coast. Saxony too rages against us without shame or
measure. A gay and pleasant exhibition this for the papists !
Although I doubt' not that this species of fury must be detestable
to learned and thoughtful men, yet I feel that I ought not to re-
* Opuscules, p. 1S08. t Ep. 176.
J IMS. Goth, in Bretschncider, p. 41,5 Cal. Apr. 1554.
A.D. 1554.] CALVIN AND WESTP1IAL. 2J(J
main any longer silent ; and certainly as far as we are concerned
the disposition was to offer resistance from the first. But our
most excellent father Bullinger thought otherwise, and made the
victory depend upon silence and forbearance. Subsequently
however he altered his opinion ; and of his own accord urged me
to write some little book to confute these infamous slanders."
Calvin in the writing referred to manifestly mistook at first
the rude importance of his opponent, and his work shows the
profoundest contempt of Westphal, whom he will not once name.
He wished to believe that as all the other Lutheran divines had
remained silent, he had only to deal with this one. He listened
however to Bullinger's advice, made him acquainted with his
work, and was guided by his remarks. That he did this with
regard both to the past and the future, appears from the writing
itself*. It was regarded, in fact, as a repetition of the " Con-
sensus," and was subscribed by all the Swiss f. Bullinger washed
Calvin to reject the doctrine of Luther with the strongest expres-
sions of dislikej : " It has not perhaps yet occurred to you how
gross," &c. Calvin had not read Luther's German writings.
They sent him some specimens ; still Bullinger blamed Calvin's
severity, and the latter answered the Zurich ministers that he
had struck out the harsh passages in his work according to their
suggestion. His apologies are very comical. He says among
other things, that what he meant by the Latin word nebulo (a
scoundrel or paltry knave) was merely ' a good-for-nothing fel-
low,' c a man of wind,' c a darkling §.' The word ' beast' he had
struck out. He could not understand, he said, why they wished
the name of Westphal to be inserted. To this he was, as before,,
wholly opposed; the work was more respectable without it. He
had but one word to say about Luther, for the sake of peace.
They also should take care not to awaken any angry feeling in
the heart.
Calvin here relates a circumstance worthy of notice. "When
Melancthon," he says, "had occasion to go to Worms, to altera
passage in the Augsburg Confession, the papists exclaimed that
both we and the Zwinglians were falsifiers. The elector of Bran-
denburg, who was then seeking the chief command in the Turk-
ish war, secretly sent a prince of Anhalt to Luther, who was to
* MS. Tigur. Calv. Bullingero, Prid. Xon. Oct. 1554.
f MS. Gen. Calv. Molinaeo Jurisconsulto, .'an. 1555.
I Mess, Leben Bullingers, Thl. ii. s. 217.
§ MS. Tigur. Nov. 13, 1554.
280 CALVIN AND WESTPHAL. [CHAP. VII.
irritate Luther against us, and persuade him to abandon our
party. But Luther afforded this proof of his moderation, that
he dismissed the traitor, and gave us, of his own accord, an ac-
count of the wickedness practised against us."
The milder expressions were adopted by general consent. Cal-
vin learned from private sources that the work had proved dis-
pleasing to Melancthon. He had not, he informed the Zurich
ministers, followed all their suggestions. The expressions which
he employs in calling their attention to wdiat is mysterious in
the sacrament are striking and beautiful*. The same may be
said of the manner in which he declares his confidence in
Luther f.
But the affair was not to be so quickly settled. From a letter
to FarelJ we learn, that the Zurich ministers were well-satisfied
with the corrected paper, but still hesitated to adopt it, alleging
that it was somewhat confused. Calvin was on the point of burn-
ing it in anger, the Council having resolved to submit it to
the censors.
This first work however against Westphal was published in
French, November 28, 1554, that the people might be made ac-
quainted with the nature of the controversy. In the preliminary
address to the Swiss ministers, Calvin expresses his utter un-
willingness to engage in controversy with a set of men indulging
in absurdities. He would write against one of them only; and to
show his contempt even for him, he would not mention his name.
In his last epistle however to Westphal, he intimates that it was
from tenderness to him that he refrained from naming him.
" This vain and foolish doctor," he says in the French dedica-
tion, " who has published a wretched work against the Sacramen-
tarians, although we know better than he how to defend the sa-
craments, speaks also against our ( Consensus/ as if we con-
templated in that document, not the sacrament, but an empty
sign." The Latin text is the more correct. We meet with the
following reproachful expressions : — " This calf afterwards cites
our own words, in which we openly confess, that the body of
Christ is actually communicated to the faithful. He answers,
that we speak only of a spiritual eating. What then ? He would
* " We readily agree that you are right, if it be in your mind to reject the
miracles imagined by superstitious men ; but to refuse to acknowledge any
mystery in the sacrament, that is to dissent too much from the secret power
of the Spirit, which we so often celebrate."
f Ep. 177- Ed. Amst. p. 84.
I MS. Gen. Calv. Farello, Pec. 26, 1554.
A.D. 1554.] CALVIN AND WESTPHAL. 281
like, I suppose, to make it appear that the flesh of Jesus Christ
may be eaten like the flesh of the oxen on his farm*. Christ
has a real natural body, as it was once offered upon the cross :
and this is daily presented to us in the sacrament/'
Calvin complains that Westphal had perverted the expressions
employed in the " Consensus/5 " Is he not like a foolish dog,
which bites at every stone that lies in his way ? This con-
fusion-counsellor pretends that we are guilty of trickery ; that
we deceive the simple, by speaking of a spiritual eating. In the
same manner this fine champion of the faith shows, that we are
all at variance with each other in our views. He has thereby
done us a service ; for nothing can more plainly prove that we
are agreed, since all our views tend to the same end, namely that
the mystery is figuratively exhibited. Even the Apostles differ
in their words, but this man supposes that we differ in sense.
Some may indeed seem to contradict each other ; but the church-
fathers and the Apostles express themselves in various ways on
the mystery of the sacrament."
"You see," he continues, "what grounds this brainless man
has for fabricating thunderbolts in his chamber to set, if possible,
all Europe in a blaze. In one place he asserts, that the words
of Christ are perfectly clear and need no commentary, when he
says that the bread is his body ; but that he said this figuratively,
which yet does not lessen the truth, that the bread is indeed the
body of Christ."
Lastly, Calvin objects to him his unholy desire to involve the
church in schism, whereas Zwingli, (Ecolampadius, and especially
Bucer, had agreed to the " Consensus." " I will confine my
answer to three words. It is the property of Satan to slander,
to darken the light; and as the father of contention, to destroy
peace, and break the unity of the faith. Such being the charac-
teristics of this babbler, nothing remains for us but to designate
him a child of the devil."
This address is followed by the work itself, which is founded
on the second "Consensus" with the Zurichcrs. Planck re-
marks the great difficulty of the undertaking, and shows how
much acutcness and prudence Calvin combined with his zealf.
This renders it so much the more remarkable that such a work
should have been so little regarded J.
* Ed. Amst. p. 651.
t Geschichtc des L'rotestant Lehrbegriffs, Bd. v. Thl. ii. s. 50.
X Opusc. Fran?, p. 1821.
282 CALVIN AND WESTPHAL. [CHAP. VII.
Calvin could not deny that the view taken by the Swiss
churches was actually different to that of the Lutherans, al-
though in principle the same. He had to show that the greatest
Lutheran theologian did in reality, without daring to acknow-
ledge it, vary in some measure from the belief of Luther him-
self; and to prove, on the other hand, that the doctrine of the
Swiss, in regard to the Lord's Supper, which was acknowledged
to be different from the Lutheran, might yet have been ap-
proved by Luther ; in other words, that he gave the true view of
the subject, and that the most intelligent theologians recognised
it as such*. Calvin therefore started with the fundamental con-
viction, that Luther in his controversy had protested only against
empty signs and symbols. In what degree Luther was right, he
would not inquire. The Lutheran divines had been somewhat
quieted, at the time of the Wittenberg Concordia, by the declara-
tions of their opponents ; but they were not fully satisfied, and
therefore he had laboured to establish the " Consensus Tigu-
rinus." This being the case, all he had to do was to prove that
in reality the signs of the bread and wine were not to be viewed
as empty signs and symbols. Here was the point between him
and Westphal ; and on this alone it really was that Luther,
whatever other differences prevailed between them, separated
from the Swiss.
Calvin's first object is to prove that his party never intended to
convert the sacrament of the Lord's Supper into a mere ceremony.
He asserts, that with the signs there are also actually united the
body and blood of Christ, and that they are given us spiritually
with the signs. According to the Lutheran doctrine, there were
no more signs, but the flesh and blood of Christ; although the
bread always remained bread. Calvin, as well as Luther, esta-
blished his doctrine on the force of Christ's words in the conse-
cration. Luther however insisted that the body of Christ was
given bodily with the bread; Calvin, that it was truly given.
Luther allowed a manducation with the mouth ; Calvin, only a
spiritual manducation. But Luther also referred it all to the soul.
In the next place, Calvin shows what he understood by a spi-
ritual eating. Thus he described faith as the organ ; and speaks of
a quickening power, which proceeds immediately from the flesh of
Christ, and exercises its vital energy on the soul. The sacra-
ment has not a mere moral force, but is an incomprehensible my-
* See Planck, Gesch. der Protest. Lehrb. s. 51.
A.D. 1554-8.] CALVIN AND WESTPHAL. 283
stery to us. As soon as the sign is received, an actual influence,
derived from the flesh of Christ and out of his substance, flows
into the soul. But still we must not imagine a local presence, or
one extended over all space. The expression < real presence and
communication* he would willingly have used, if people would
have been content to employ it in a spiritual sense. On the other
hand, he stated why he could not admit the Lutheran notion
respecting a local presence and eating the flesh of Christ. He
candidly confessed that the idea appeared to him altogether irra-
tional. The understanding, he acknowledged, must be silent
when the Scriptures speak ; but in this case they do not. Christ
cannot be corporeally present in many places at once, because
that is contrary to the nature of bodies.
But a short time had elapsed after the appearance of Calvin's
work, when Westphal's miserable answer was published at Frank-
fort. He soon renewed also his attack upon Laski and the
other exiles, and even called upon the Frankfort ministers to
persecute them. It is characteristic of his temper, that when
Laski, in a letter written with true Christian feeling, reprehended
his conduct, and showed that he had treated them as if they had
been thieves, murderers, and poisoners, he had the letter printed,
appending an answer to it, in which he senselessly repeated, that
they were not only thieves, murderers, and poisoners, but much
more infamous, for that by their false doctrine they were mur-
derers of souls.
Luther had never thus forgotten himself; often therefore did
Calvin sigh, "Ah ! would that Luther were still alive ! These
people have none of his virtues, but they think to prove them-
selves his disciples by their clamours*." Westphal gathered to-
gether a great number of confessions from the towns of Saxony,
which solemnly declared themselves in favour of the Lutheran, and
opposed to the Calvinistic, doctrine. Calvin was now assailed
on all sides. Brentius appeared in YViirtemberg with his homilies,
in which he supported the most violent views on the subject of
the real presence. Jacob Andrea advocated the same doctrine, at
first with more moderation, but he subsequently became one of
its fiercest champions : he sent his writing to Calvin, and the
latter answered him, praising his moderation -j\ In the year 1557
Schnepf and others followed in the same track. Westphal him-
self answered Calvin's second writing ; so that the reformer com-
* MS. Goth. ed. Br. p. 43, Calv. Sidcmanno, Mar. 1555.
f Ed. Laus. Ep. 240. Ed. Amstcl. p. 114, b. Calvin to Dr. Jacob Andrea.
284 CALVIN AND WESTPHAL. [CHAP. VII.
plained to Bullinger that there seemed to be a conspiracy against
him*.
Calvin made a second and third experiment to extinguish West-
phal's fire by his own ; but he only increased the fury of the
flames thereby. Westphal answered him with such an excess of
zeal, that Calvin, always ardent in the defence of his dignity,
though not without discretion, as was apparent in his terrible
conflict with Servetus before the Council, drew himself back, and
was silent, leaving the field to Beza, fresh and well-armed for the
conflict, and ready to take his friend's place in this instance, as
he had in the controversy on predestination.
A glance at the writings thus produced, and at the spirit by
which they were dictated, will show7 how wise Melancthon was
not to meddle with the controversy ; but he should have strongly
protested against the wicked temper which now prevailed, and
have pointed out the path which Christians ought to tread.
Calvin's second work against Westphal was written with in-
credible rapidity, and sent to the press without revisal ; it is the
only work of Calvin's of which this is said. But it exhibits great
skill in reconciling and winning hostile minds. Calvin's chief
difficulty, with regard to most of the questions before him, arose
from his desire to adopt a middle course, and which it is so much
less easy to pursue than that which is extreme. This was
especially the case in his viewr of the efficacy of baptism, of the
spiritual eating in the Lord's Supper, and of the punishment of
heretics. It was in the article of predestination only that he
carried his docirine to the farthest limits of the subject.
Before the work appeared, he wrote to Bullinger as follows :
" When I said that Westphal desired nothing more than to bring
a countless host of antagonists into the field against us, I felt
anxious to say as little as possible that might be offensive to his
party. If time allowed, I should have been glad to let you read
this work before it was published : I might perhaps have altered
some things on your suggestion. But the haste was so great,
that I only dictated it, another person read it through, and I
then immediately sent it to the press."
Calvin's friends at Geneva did not think the style of this
work too violent ; and he allowed himself to be easily persuaded
that they were right. But soon after its appearance, January
5, 1556, he confessed to Bullinger that he had been too severe,
* MS. Tigur. That is, to crush him under a mountain of books. " Luthe-
ranosconspira^e video, ut libiorum mole nos obruant."
A.D. 1554-8.] CALVIN AND WESTPIIAL. 285
adding however a jest to this acknowledgement. It is some-
what strange indeed to find a work on so important a subject
sent so suddenly into the world, and with a sort of petulant
gaiety, the author himself afterwards doubting whether he had
done right. The treatise in fact is the production of a genius
which could venture on an arrogant employment of its powers.
Bullinger also entered at this time into controversy with West-
phal.
But it was Calvin's object, as appeared from the very title-page
of the book, to invite to peace ; the work being dedicated to all
true servants of the Lord in Saxony and Lower Germany. In the
preface he called them to witness, that he had been constrained
to send his earlier productions into the world by the furious
spirits which were raging abroad, and whose conduct was even
worse than the barbarity of the papists. He only wrote for the
purpose of promoting unity. Expressing himself very properly
respecting the hatred manifested by Westphal, he apologises for
the heat which he had himself displayed : — " If I have treated him
harshly, and used strong expressions in some passages, you must
consider, according to your wisdom, howT he has goaded me to this.
His book appears written with no other object but that of casting
us down to hell, and overwhelming us with curses. What could
I do otherwise than act according to the proverb, c The bad ass
must have a bad driver/ to prevent his wrath having too much
its own way?"
While there was any hope of procuring peace for the church,
Calvin could humbly solicit it ; but we see the aim of his op-
ponents, and God himself gave him an example to justify his
stern treatment of the obstinately wicked: — "Thou wilt save the
afflicted people, but wilt bring down high looks." (Ps. xviii. 27.)
<{ Westphal,'' he says, " allows that I have written correctly on
the dignity and operation of the sacraments. Whether I have
actually done so, I do not inquire ; it is enough if I have done
it with a pious feeling." There remained but three points to dis-
cuss. Westphal insisted — 1. That the substantial bread was the
body of Christ. 2. That his body was infinite, and everywhere
present. 3. That there was nothing figurative in the words of
Christ.
"We assert," says Calvin, " that the body and blood of Christ
are actually given to us in the sacrament, that our souls may
receive life therefrom ; and that they may be nourished by this
spiritual food, as our bodies are by earthly bread. We acknow-
286 CALVIN AND WESTPHAL. [CHAP. VII.
ledge therefore that a real communication of the body and blood
of Christ takes place in the sacrament. If any one, for the sake
of disputing, attaches importance to the word e substance/ we
assert that Christ gives life to our souls through the f substance*
of his flesh."
Westphal says, in the first place, that the substantial bread is
the body of Christ. Whence it follows that a wicked man
swallows the body of Christ with the bread. Judas therefore
received the body of Christ as well as Peter. Westphal and his
party in fact had formed a notion of substance which did not
agree with the words of Christ. The unbelief of a man cannot
indeed alter the virtue of the sacrament, but it will not act
upon the unbeliever, because the organ, faith, which is neces-
sary to our receiving Christ, is wanting to such a person.
The second point relates to the mode and manner of the com-
munication, which, according to Westphal, cannot take place if
the body of Christ be not infinite. " He insists that the body
must appear before our eyes, and that, were this not the case,
it could not be communicated to us. We, on the contrary, be-
lieve that the separation of place is here of no concern, because
it is the energy of the Holy Ghost which derives life for us out
of the flesh of Christ. Hence the manifest wickedness of those
who, to make us hateful in the eyes of the people, exclaim that
we deny the presence of Christ in the sacrament, and measure
the power of God by our senses. As if this were not a mystery,
the depths of which surpass ail understanding, when we say that
Christ, although now glorified in the body, yet comes down to
us through the secret grace of his Holy Spirit, that we may be
partakers of his life, — as if he, who teaches that life flows into us
from the flesh of Christ, does not exalt the power of God as
highly as he who says, that this flesh comes down from heaven
to work life in us."
In the third place, Westphal asserts, that no inquiry need be
instituted as to the meaning of the words of consecration, which
were plain enough. " We, on the contrary," says Calvin, " ap-
peal to the common usage which gives to the sign the name of
the thing signified. But with us, when the discourse regards
the sacrament, it is not of an empty sign that we speak ; for we
declare, plainly and intelligibly, that the Lord fulfils in reality
that which he testifies. What we desire is, that people should
distinguish the things, and that they should thereby be led from
the visible sign to that which is invisible ; for to what end does
A.D. 1554-8.] CALVIN AND WESTPHAL. 287
Christ give us the earthly element unless thus to elevate us ? If
it be granted as a help to our unbelief, no one must expect to
attain to the thing itself without the use of this means ; and thus,
step by step, ascending from earth to heaven."
Hereupon Calvin exhorts his opponents to the cultivation of
peace. " I beseech you, by the most holy name of Christ, and
by the bonds of righteousness, which we have in Him, afford
your help to accomplish this object. Whatever door you open
to us whereby we may effect a reconciliation so greatly to be de-
sired, I solemnly declare to you that I am not only inclined to
take advantage of it, but shall seize the opportunity with joy and
with all my heart." And yet Westphal persevered in asserting,
that Calvin was guilty of tearing the churches asunder, which,
under God's guidance, agreed so nobly together in all points of
doctrine.
The several ideas here alluded to having been developed with
great force and logical precision, there follow some passages full
of power and eloquence, and which, while they display the ex-
alted spirit of Calvin, place in an equally clear light the unworthy
character of Westphal. Calvin offered to hold a disputation with
him ; but he would not listen to the proposal. The controversy
was not likely to be determined by writing ; but Westphal de-
pended upon the number of his associates.
He objected to the " Reformed," that they had abolished all
ceremonies. Calvin replied that they (Westphal and his party)
retained certain vain observances in the celebration of the sacra-
ment, such as lighting wax-candles in the day-time, and against
which practices Luther had for the most part protested, although
it was necessary for awhile to allow them. Westphal condemned
all the churches of southern Germany and of Switzerland, and
then boasts of his humility. Calvin breaks forth into these ex-
clamations: — "O Ishmael, thou whose hand is against us all,
may the hands of all be against thee ! For as Luther's magna-
nimity deserved so much the greater praise, because he stood
alone, and did not hesitate to attack the whole papacy, so art thou
the more contemptible in thy cowardice when thou seekest in
light and trivial things for the means of sowing dissension among
the people of God."
We now arrive at the objections which Westphal urged against
the reformed churches in general, and in respect to which Cal-
vin defended them. It is said, for example, that children were
allowed to die without baptism, because women were prohibited
288 CALVIN AND WESTPHAL. [CHAP. VII.
from affording it in case of necessity, which was against the
commandment of Christ. But " children are not thereby lost,
for God has said, i I will be your God, and you shall be my
seed/ The grace which is given to the parents is derived to the
offspring." Again : " He accuses us of not giving the sacra-
ment to the sick ; but we refuse it to avoid superstition, for it
has been the custom to parade the bread about as if it were on
a stage, and because moreover the Lord's Supper ought to be
partaken of in society." And further : " We have no absolution,
it is said, before the sacrament. We answer, that there may be
errors among us ; but absolution is papistical. It is not my
design however to assert that particular absolution may not have
something useful in it ; I have even recommended its adoption
in several parts of my writings, if it be free and without super-
stition ; but it is neither wise nor allowable to make it the law,
and so binding upon the conscience."
In the next place WTestphal accuses Calvin of retaining the
second commandment against images. " We shall show," says
the reformer, "on good grounds, that the ten commandments
are correctly divided by us : we have ancient testimony on our
side. Westphal, in order to darken the commandment which
forbids idolatry, tears the last commandment into two pieces."
And, finally, Westphal was indignant at the manner in which
the Reformed had modified the calendar of the church. Calvin
replies : " Mary's day and other saint days are not of primitive
origin ; but Westphal believes that all is lost if we do not fol-
low the Hamburg calendar." With regard to the arrangement
of the lessons from Scripture, Calvin says : " Formerly the whole
of the gospel was read to the people ; but now only portions, as
time allows ; and one knows well, and it is only necessary to read
the extracts to see, that these little fragments of the Bible have
been selected without judgement. Certainly, if it be good to
extract certain portions for Sunday reading, the choice ought to
have been different to what it is : and assuredly, whoever he may
be who made this selection, he has not only incorrecthy divided
every passage, but has sometimes, through ignorance or negli-
gence, broken off in the very middle of a statement." Westphal
spoke also with great indignation respecting the " Postils."
" We may pardon Luther," he says ; " he accommodated him-
self to the prevailing custom, all things being then in disorder;
and he deserves to be praised for having endeavoured to teach
the Gospel in the shortest way." — "Thus Westphal celebrates
A. D. 1555-8.] CALVIN AND WESTPHAL. 289
St. Martin's day with the papists, and chants with them the
gospels and epistles according to the fine sing-song of the mass-
book ; as if the Gospel would be lost if it were not thus torn into
fragments. Is there any one now that can doubt that this man
has too much leisure in his corner, when he can venture to
annoy people, who have enough to do, with trifles of this sort?"
Westphal accused Calvin of pride. Calvin answered: " If I
have received a measure of grace from God, I endeavour to use
it, without pride or boasting, for the edification of the church.
My books bear witness that there is a great deal wanting to
make me ambitious of gaining advantage over others, or of ap-
pearing in the light of a scholar or a genius. There is nothing
which I avoid more than boasting." Westphal having asserted
that his church might be compared to the angels in heaven,
Calvin exclaims, " O Luther, how few hast thou left behind pos-
sessed of the glorious gifts which were in thee ! But how many
hast thou left who imitate, like apes, thy peculiarities ! We won-
der not that Luther had frequently such lofty words in his mouth.
He could not have warred so bravely under the banner of the
Lord, had he not despised the world with all its greatness ; but
it is insufferable when such a drone as this, whose unintelligible
din only throws the bees into confusion, dares to speak so high."
Calvin, referring to himself, says, " If I assert that I am faith-
ful in my endeavour to make the whole world feel that it depends
upon the word of Christ alone, I can adduce not only my books
and my daily discourses to prove the truth of this, but all those
persons who witness my daily labour; and so gloriously does
God seal my efforts with his blessing, that were there ten West-
phals, the fruits and the profitableness of my toil could not be
made to appear contemptible. If, indeed, I speak of the blessing
of my calling, I do this in common with the Apostle Paul." —
" I should wish," says Westphal, " ignorant as I am, to know
what notion this writer forms of learned men." — "As if, in order to
find a learned man besides Westphal, we should have recourse to
the Platonic theory of ideas." — " It is not in the school of Archi-
medes that we have learnt that the body of Christ, which was
taken up into heaven, is far from the earth. We believe that it
is authentically stated in the Holy Scriptures. I dare not, in
the weakness of my understanding, pretend to miess from what
system of philosophy Westphal has learnt that Christ,, when he
first celebrated the sacrament, had a twofold body; one mortal,
visible, confined to one place; and one invisible, of infinite ex-
VOL. II. U
2i;0 CALVIN AND WESTPHAL. [CHAP. VII.
tension." — " Westphal is proud, and applies to himself what is
said in the Psalms. I understand, he says, more than all those
who have taught you. And what rank then will Luther have, if
he who stands on the lowest step be thus above him?"
" In conclusion, he says, 'That if he were not learned, there
would be no ground to fear him/ And truly it requires but little
to make me grant what he so much desires." — " As if he were
taking the part of Jupiter in a play, and bore a Minerva in his
head, he makes no difficulty of clothing all his sentiments in the
language of God's word. If it had not been the custom, from
remote times, for all false prophets, the farther they are from
God, to exhibit the greater audacity, and shield themselves with
his name, he might perhaps have gained something by his deceit,
and by thus terrifying the people."
This work is not only interesting from its being written in the
old, naive French, in which Calvin delighted to express his
powerful humour, but it is also valuable for the force of its
crushing argumentation, for the life and sublimity of its style,
and the occasional expression of profound indignation by which
it is characterized. Calvin has been sometimes accused of too
much violence in this controversy ; but he everywhere proves the
un worthiness and folly of his adversary, and is always con-
siderate.
At the end of the second defence Calvin reviewed the entire
subject, and again states his opinion respecting the sacrament of
baptism, observing that it is profitable as introducing us into the
church, but not indispensably necessary to salvation. He con-
cludes the work with another attack upon his noisy antagonist.
The third work against Westphal crowned the argument. Cal-
vin's indignation here displayed itself in the highest degree ; and
this though he had been warned by Farel ; for he could not, he
said, moderate himself in contending with Westphal*. It was im-
possible, he added, to view this man and his associates any longer
as brethren. They themselves had execrated the name. He was
willing however to bear blame from Farel, and he did not con-
ce;d from himself that he was likely to become an object of
general hatred. " But God will be well-pleased if, boldly and
joy fully, I do not shrink from awakening against myself the wrath
of these wild beasts."
After an introduction, in which he defends, and partly excuses
himself, he first answers the accusation advanced by Westphal,
* MS. Gen. Calvl Farello, August 1, 1557.
A.D. 1555-8.] CALVIN AND WESTPHAL. 291
namely, that he overthrew the Augsburg Confession, and that
Melancthon was against him. Secondly, he shows that the
primitive church was represented by Augustin, as stated by
Westphal ; and thirdly, he combats the various doctrines of the
Saxon church, and defends his own view of the Lord's Supper.
With regard to Melancthon he speaks thus strongly : " It would
be as easy for a man to separate Melancthon from me in this
thing, as to separate him from himself. He has feared, it is true,
the thunder of some people in his neighbourhood (this will be
understood by those who know that Luther was excited against
him), nor has he always spoken so distinctly as I could wish ;
but Westphal must not be allowed maliciously to assert, that he
only waited for Luther's death to join our party. We discussed
this subject together seventeen years ago, and the first words
which we interchanged showed that we agreed so well, that we
had not to speak of altering a syllable, either on the one side or
the other." — " Thus Caspar Cruciger, who, next to Melancthon,
was most beloved by Luther, so clearly apprehended the doctrine
which Westphal now assails, that nothing could better agree than
our expressions*."
Calvin now describes, and refutes, Westphal's last production,
in which he called upon the princes and magistrates to punish
heretics. Calvin, who in all difficult questions took a middle
course, asserts, on the other hand, " that punishment ought only
to be inflicted when a trial had been regularly instituted, and
the heresy was well-defined, and not according to the course pur-
sued by the papists, who murder the innocent. He speaks, in
this case, very strongly in favour of toleration. Westphal called
every one a heretic who differed from him in opinion, without
any inquiry into the several views which people may adopts and
he insisted that punishment ought to be immediately inflicted.
Many churches agreed with him. But how was it that a much
greater number of his own party, than of our churches, con-
demned him? He speaks of the union of the princes at Smal-
calde : but it was not the design of these princes to condemn us.
Bucer and Melancthon were both present. At Marburg we were
regarded as the brethren of Luther, although the question at
issue was not then so distinctly stated as it now is. Westphal
is so unreasonable that he objects to us, that our doctrine has
condemned the popes, Nicholas and Gregory VII., which we, on
the contrary, regard ;is an honour.''
Planck, b. 74, 104.
U 2
292 CALVIN AND WESTPHAL. [CHAP. VII.
The accusation brought against Calvin, that he had never read
Augustin, is refuted by Calvin's appeal to that author. " Why,"
says Augustin, " make the teeth and the body ready ? — believe,
and thou hast eaten." Westphal quotes a great many of Au-
gust in's expressions, in which that father calls the bread the body
of Christ. " And we do the same," says Calvin, " in the sense
in which he does it;" and he then again patiently states the real
point disputed. " Is the sense of Christ's words figurative or
not figurative ? " This Westphal would never distinctly answer.
Hereupon follows the proof, that Augustin also admitted a me-
tonyme. " He says that when Christ distributed the sacrament,
he bore, so to say, his body. But Westphal leaves out this so
to say, which is the main part of the sentence. According to
Augustin, the good and the wicked receive the sacrament alike.
We say the same ; for Christ is always therein present ; but the
wicked receive the sign only, they being destitute of the faith,
which is necessary to our partaking of the power of the sacra-
ment."
This is followed by a resume of the argument. " 1. Augustin
takes the words of Christ figuratively, which Westphal denies.
2. We adopt the doctrine of a spiritual eating, but in such a
sense that the sacramental only remains. True piety abhors the
gross imagination, that we can swallow what is divine. West-
phal, by making the spiritual effect the consequence of the eating,
limits the salvation accomplished for us by the death of Christ.
3. WTestphal objects to us, that we believe only such a presence
of Christ in the sacrament as leaves his human nature altogether
disregarded." Hereupon follows the well-known reasoning
against ubiquity and consubstantiation. We must not, it is ar-
gued, assert things in theology which are altogether impossible
according to the laws of the understanding. The statement,
" God is not bound by natural laws, because He himself made
them," is absurd, or rather proves the contrary. Much neces-
sarily remains incomprehensible to us in the Lord's Supper.
With regard to the eating of the sacrament by unbelievers, the
Swiss had granted the point in the Concordia, allowing that the
signs only were received. In the Zurich l Consensus ' Calvin
declared, that he did not agree with the Lutheran doctrine. In
opposition to Westphal, who thence argued that Calvin did not
acknowledge the real presence of the Lord in the sacrament, the
reformer drew up another conclusion.
Calvin refers, in the next place, to the followers of Westphal
A.D. 1555-8.] CALVIN AND WESTPHAL. 293
in the Saxon academies. " They hate Melancthon," he says,
" and join with Westphal, because the sharpness of my language
displeases them. This is the case with Flacius Illyricus and Eras-
mus Sarcerus." He shows Westphal how his own party only
in some respects agreed with him, while they in others dis-
sented from his views. This leads him to examine the Magde-
burg Confession, in reviewing which he very patiently refutes
the errors exhibited in twenty-eight articles of that formulary ;
and also the answer of his opponents to the fifty-nine arguments
which he had employed in the present discussion, and had exa-
mined anew and defended. The whole is summed up in this,
that they wished people to adhere to the Word alone, without
any interpretation. "This much is certain, that we have pene-
trated an insurmountable wall ; that the Lord has established a
sacrament ; and that, according to the common usage of Scrip-
ture, these words must be interpreted in a sacramental sense, in
the usual style and manner, that is, of the sacrament, namely,
that the sign receives the name of the thing which it betokens."
Lastly, he controverts the dogmas of several other Saxon
churches, as those of Bremen, Hildesheim. &c, which were
especially indignant at Calvin's dedicating his second treatise to
them.
We see, from what has been stated, that it was Calvin's rule
to answer every objection, and to let nothing pass unnoticed.
The repetition of so many points is often wearisome, and it was
in direct contrast with the plan pursued by Melancthon, who
hoped to subdue his enemies by silence. Calvin concludes with
a proposal of peace. "Unwilling should I be," he says, " not-
withstanding these things, to be a hindrance to the establishment
of a solid friendship between us, and the fulfilment of the hope
that we may still enjoy peace. With regard to myself, I have
been called forth in a very unworthy manner, and circumstances
have excited me to speak more vehemently than I wis lied in this
writing ; but if anyone will appoint the place and time, and agree
to discuss this matter in a friendly spirit with me, I promise to
be prepared to meet him immediately, and with sueh good feel-
ing, that everything shall be done, on my side, which can lead
to a true and holy agreement, an event which every one must
desire."
Calvin indeed, throughout the controversy, anxiously endea-
voured to effect a reconciliation, and challenged his opponents
to adduce one word in his statement which did not aurcc with
294 CALVIX AND WESTPHAL. [CHAP. VII.
the ' Confession' drawn up at Ratisbone in 1541. He made the
noblest efforts to accomplish a union, and even in the midst of
the controversy stretched out the hand of a brother to his adver-
sary. " I call Christ/' he says, " and all the angels to witness,
that the moment Westphal will abandon his obstinacy, it shall
not be my fault if there do not reign between us friendship and
brotherly love. Even now, if he will show a brother's heart
towards me, I am ready to love him as a brother in return."
Calvin, in fact, always proved himself anxious to seize upon
the points which might secure a reunion of the churches ; while
Westphal, on the contrary, was as disposed to magnify differ-
ences. With the one, the spiritual eating in the sacrament was
sufficient, because Christ was believed to be actually present ;
the other held to the words, " This is my body," without under-
standing them ; and Calvin, had he refrained from all personal-
ities, and written with more moderation, would have gained one
of the best and fairest of victories. In many instances indeed
he did thus triumph, and Calvinism itself has since made the
greatest progress in Germany, and has now the common voice
of the church on its side.
A letter written by Calvin to Martin Schaling, a minister at
Ratisbone, affords a good illustration of his fine and earnest love
of unity*. The same desire of peace induced him at last to de-
spise WestphaFs wrath, and to let it expend itself in noise f. He
once again assailed the Lutheran zealots with admirable force,
when he found them renouncing every overture to peace J. Such
were the lengths to which the foolish Saxon ministers allowed
themselves to be carried, that they were constantly ready with
their anathemas ; they excommunicated each other, and it was
now a serious question among them, whether they ought not to
pronounce the ban upon Calvin. The reformer felt however
that if they should indulge their wrath to this ridiculous extent,
he had only to meet the attack with silence §.
Melancthon's behaviour in this controversy still remains a
riddle. Calvin complained, in the severest terms, of his e drow-
siness.' He adjured him, in the name of God, to come forth and
declare his opinions, and prevent the separation of the churches ;
but he summoned him in vain. Planck supposes || that Me-
* Ed. Laus. Ep. 236. Ed. Amstel. p. 112, March 25, 1557.
t MS. Tigur. Calv. Bullingero, Nov. 19, 1558.
J Ed. Laus. Ep. 292. Ed. A.mst. p. 140, April 22. 1560.
§ M.S. Gen. Calv. Earello.
II Bd. v. Thl. 2. s. 416.
A.D. 1555-8.] CORRESPONDExVCE WITH MELANCTHON. 295
lancthon was inclined to adopt a more refined policy ; that he
meant to let the fire burn itself out ; to preserve the appearance
of abiding by Luther's doctrine, and yet by his influence to pre-
vent the faith of the church on the points in question from being
so exactly defined, as to enable either party to use it for the
condemnation of the other. But if this were the case, it is diffi-
cult to understand why he did not communicate his design to
Calvin, and exhort him also to preserve silence. I think however
that Melancthon took a higher stand, and that he held his peace
from Christian conviction. He adhered to the expression regard-
ing the actual presence of Christ in the sacrament, agreed alto-
gether with Calvin, and believed that the truth would conquer.
The correspondence between Calvin and Melancthon, the long
powerful letters of the former, and the short answers of the latter,
are in the highest degree striking. Melancthon was anxious to
communicate personally with Calvin before he died. He con-
stantly designated the error of the Lutherans ( bread-worship/
apToXarpeia. Calvin wished to induce him to subscribe the re-
newed ' Consensus ' with the Zurichers. Melancthon, in the
year 1555, promised to state his sentiments openly. Calvin
hereupon wrote him a letter expressive of the liveliest satisfac-
tion*. Their correspondence now ceased for two years; not
three, as is commonly supposed.
Calvin, through this whole period, was occupied with the
thought of a Convention, in which certain right-minded repre-
sentatives of the churches might come to an understanding re-
specting the points at issue. He communicated this idea to
Melancthon, and prayed that he " might yet once more enjoyjthe
glad sight of his countenance in this world, and be somewhat
refreshed by him, whilst they wept together over the evils which
they could not prevent."
Others, as Blaarer and Martyr (1558), complained, in the
strongest language, of Melancthon's weakness (imbecillitas).
They all considered that if he had but openly declared himself
in favour of the views adopted by the Reformed, the separation
of the church would never have taken place. But Calvin would
not grieve the now aged man, and was silent.
In the year 1559 the Lutheran zealots had forced the con-
demnation of Calvinism. Melancthon however declared, that
no one had a right to make the orthodoxy of the whole church
depend upon the private opinions of Luther. lie felt himself
* Ed. Laus. I. p. 210 Ed. Amstel. p. 100, Sept. 155."..
296 DEATH OF MELANCTHON. [CHAP. VII.
also compelled to declare openly against Brentius, who, in the
Wiirtemberg 6 Concordia/ had attacked him as i a neutral theo-
logian/ and had asserted the ubiquity of the human body of
Christ as a fundamental doctrine. But this was his last effort.
Peucer states, that he defended, as well as the short time before
his death allowed him, the doctrine of the union of the two na-
tures in his lectures. This had an important relation to the
question at issue. A vast number of his young followers, it is
also added, were rightly instructed by him on this subject.
Such was the state of the controversy when Melancthon was
called to his eternal rest. It happened at the moment when he
was summoned, nay almost compelled, by Brentius, openly to
declare his opinions. The melancholy tidings were conveyed to
Geneva. Calvin inquired the day when he died : it was the 19th
of April, 1560. Melancthon left Calvin alone on the field of
strife. They were both destined to be cruelly persecuted in the
last days of their life by their own party. The one submitted,
and lamented the wickedness of mankind ; the other fought
bravely on to his end, awakening respect by his courage. We
cannot better characterize the feeling of these two men, than by
the words which rose from the depth of Calvin's soul, as he
meditated on Melancthon : — " O Philip Melancthon, I appeal to
thee as my witness ! Thou now livest with Christ in the presence
of God, and waitest for us to share with thee that blessed rest.
Wearied with labour, oppressed with many cares, a hundred
times didst thou express thy wish to live and die with me. I too
a thousand times wished that we could live together. Assuredly
thou wouldst then have been stronger to begin the fight ; to de-
spise the hate, and to treat with contempt all the slanders of
thine enemies ; and thus would the designs of the wicked, ren-
dered bold by what they called your sleepiness, have been dis-
appointed."
When Wrestphal again answered Calvin, the latter remained
silent; his reasons for doing so may be learnt from what is stated
at the end of Beza's work : " Westphal uses expressions which
are proper only to the lowest class of women." But Beza, like
Calvin, preferred friendship, and carried on the controversy so
happily, that Westphal was brought to silence. Melancthon had
formerly said, that the strife would continue after his death. In
January 1561 another controversial writing by Calvin was printed
at Geneva, and soon circulated through Germany. Tileman
Hesshus, one of the zealots of that period, affords us, in his life,
A.D. 1555-8.] THE LUTHERAN AND SWISS CHURCHES. 297
an image of those unquiet times : he had so rude and untamed a
heart, that he was seven times deposed from his office, and ex-
pelled. This wrangler was now anxious to fasten upon Calvin.
The reformer took the pains to confute him fundamentally. Beza
also answered him. How Calvin regarded the work directed
against him appears from two letters, the one of which, wherein
he expresses his contempt for the man, is addressed to Olevia-
nus, and the other to a prince, whose name is unknown. The
latter was written for the object of defeating the unheard-of plans
of the Lutherans, now proposing to excommunicate the whole of
the reformed churches in a mass. Calvin declares himself ready-
to accept the Augsburg Confession in all its articles, but not the
expressions of the new Stoa of theologians. He thus criticises
Hesshus : " I have read the book written by Hesshus ; he inserts
the disputed points in the definition; passes over the exposition
of the apostle Paul ; gives his own, which is new and unheard of,
instead, and thus quietly sets it aside. He adduces authorities
which have nothing to do with his argument, but rather support
the contrary. In fact he writes, not to teach, but to judge and
to condemn.''
Calvin next declares explicitly his own opinions, and asks,
whether any one would personally anathematize him as a heretic?
He further proves the absurdities of his opponents, especially
those involved in the ubiquity of the body, and the worship of
the host. This is followed by a severe expression against those
who, in their mad folly, were anxious to assemble a synod for the
purpose of condemning the French and Swiss churches. Calvin
also shows how the reformed of all countries were excited, and
how the queen of England, although inclined to the Augsburg
Confession, could not be induced to adopt the carnal form of the
words. It was not, he said, the pure or actual doctrine of Luther
which these people adopted, but an hyperbole thereof. He next
confutes their false and perverted views of Melancthon, whom
they described as a weak old man, and shows his agreement with
him and Martyr. The whole affair, he reminded them, would
serve as a jubilee for the Catholics. The reformer, on the other
hand, earnestly desired a national council of the three people, of
Germany, France and England, — a council at which some prince
should preside, and in which the ambassadors of other princes
might take a part. Before the assembling of such a council, the
heads of the other parties, as Martyr, Bullinger, Calvin, Beza,
should be invited to attend, and the questions at issue might then
298 THE LUTHERAN AND SWISS CHURCHES. [CHAP.VII.
be fairly discussed. The tyrannical synod which the others pro-
posed to assemble could only tend to create a schism, the flames
of which posterity might not be able to extinguish.
Calvin proves, in his writing against Hesshus, how opposed
the latter was to Westphal, who boldly asserted that the body
of Christ is masticated with the teeth. Hesshus, on the contrary,
insisted, that it may be eaten with the mouth, but not touched
with the teeth, and is altogether opposed to the grosser idea.
Calvin now states how he understood and used the word ' sub-
stantial/ Thus Christ, he says, through the secret power of his
Spirit, applies to us the life of his own Spirit, so that He lives
in us, and his life becomes ours. He now again reviews the whole
subject, and expresses his hearty good-will to promote peace and
unity, giving at the same time a brief abstract of the points in
which the two parties agreed or disagreed, and thus placing the
whole subject in the clearest point of view.
But no effort availed to soften the passions which had been
excited, and after sixteen years of violent strife, and when Calvin
was dead, it belonged to the Lutherans to perpetuate the schism
by the Concordate-formulary (1580), in which all the points op-
posed by Calvin, in regard both to the sacrament and predestina-
tion, were adopted as symbolic. The fiery zeal of the Lutherans
excited a general movement. The churches of Bremen, Hesse,
and the Palatinate; Anhalt, and the house of Brandenburg, passed
over to the Reformed. The schism was rendered still greater by
the Synod of Dort, which took a political character ; and the fana-
ticism of the Particularists rendered a reunion hopeless. It is
impossible to tell the consequences of this unhappy separation.
During the thirty years' war, the Elector Palatine was placed
on the throne of Bohemia. From the same cause, the Huguenots
of France were forsaken by their brethren ; and the German
schism transferred the judicial power at Minister to the hands of the
former country. Alsace was now snatched from enfeebled Ger-
many. The lower Palatinate was overrun with troops ; and thus
the separation between Luther and Zwingli, and the rage of the
zealots, became the curse of our fatherland.
Numberless efforts were made by the Reformed church to re-
store peace, and thus to repair the ills inflicted by Luther's error.
These experiments were indications of the existence of a noble,
inward life, it being a principle interwoven with the very con-
sciousness of a Christian to contemplate the church as one. It
was Christ's prayer to his Father that his disciples might "be
A. D. 1555-8.] THE LUTHERAN AND SWISS CHURCHES. 299
one, as they are one/' The Holy Spirit still urges us to the
same end.
Calvin hoped much from an assembly of theologians. A
meeting took place at Worms, in conformity with the orders of
the Emperor Ferdinand. It was an experiment to bring the
Lutherans and Catholics nearer to each other, but it only served
to render their separation more evident. Representatives from
Geneva were present. Calvin sought thereby to accomplish the
object which he had in view, and to awaken the sympathy of the
German princes and divines in behalf of the poor persecuted be-
lievers in France. This could only be rendered possible by in-
ducing the German Evangelical party to acknowledge the Re-
formed as their brethren : hitherto they had spoken against them
rather than in their behalf, although they both received in com-
mon the Augsburg Confession.
Farel and Beza had already been sent, at an earlier period, to
the Reformed Swiss cantons, to persuade them to employ their
influence with the king of France in behalf of the persecuted
Waldenses. Having accomplished their purpose in this case,
they next hastened to the Elector Palatine, who received them
graciously, and sent them to the Duke of Wiirtemberg. The
latter however, to avoid interfering for the Waldenses, pretended
that they were Sacramentarians. Thus Farel and Beza found
themselves obliged to place in his hands a new and strongly ex-
pressed confession respecting the presence of Christ in the sa-
crament. When the Zurichers were informed of this proceeding,
they expressed great anger, and insisted that the confession re-
ferred to was not in accordance with their doctrine. They severely
reproved Beza, and the latter promised to give them on the first
occasion a full explanation of the matter, and to act in constant
union with them. Farel heard of this misunderstanding when
he came to Beza at Lausanne, and apologized in a letter, in which
he says that neither Viret, nor Andrea, norOalvin, saw anything
worthy to blame in what had been done. He was astonished, he
says, now that the other party was reconciled, that the Zurichers
should still be inclined to wrath, and he speaks \< ry excellently
on the sacrament and the unity oft he church. " 1 thank God thai
this holy union of the churches lias now been proclaimed before
God, the angels and men. I would willingly have shed my blood
for this; Far rather would I that any one should take my life,
than that I should separate from this holy union. Tellme there-
fore it' 1 have offended you in the slightest point, and 1 will
300 CONVENTION PROPOSED. [CHAP. VII.
hasten to seek your pardon/' Beza also justified himself. But
when Calvin asserted that the confession spoken of was the true
expression of their belief, Bullinger sharply assailed him. and
imputed to him the doubtful language employed by Bucer.
Hence it appears, that although the Swiss cantons were de-
sirous of peace, the Zurichers, who adhered with painful anxiety
to their opinions, still presented an obstacle to the union of the
churches.
Bullinger remained inflexible in his belief that a convention
would be of no avail. The assurance that Melancthon was in
favour of the meeting was wholly disregarded. Calvin however,
who recollected the diet of Ratisbone, hoped much from an oral
discussion, if Brentius, that is, were prevented from taking the
chief part in the assembly. Such was the state of affairs, when
the church of Geneva sent Farel and Beza, for the second
time, with John Bude and Caspar Carmel, in order to summon
the Protestant powers to interest themselves earnestly with Henri
II. of France, in behalf of their brethren in his kingdom. Calvin
would not go to Worms, as Farel wished : he wrote however to
Melancthon three times in the course of six weeks, to urge him
to unceasing exertion. Having spoken strongly against Andrea,
he says, "The issue of the meeting at Worms will only be that
the papists will invent delays, according to their old fashion, and
will have the princes, the defenders of the true faith, for the most
part on their side." It was the violent Lutherans however, the
followers, that is, of Flacius, who mainly contributed to destroy
the fruit of this assembly.
In the meantime, the Genevese deputies, who had been before
in Zurich, commenced their duties at Worms ; but they created
another cause of offence to the Zurichers. Melancthon expressed
a hope that something would be done for their afflicted brethren.
Another persecution of the Waldenses, among the Alps of Turin
and Grenoble, had been begun in October 155/. Three of these
unfortunate people were burnt in Paris to spread terror among
the rest. The Protestants wished to have a short confession of
faith drawn up, that they might be the better able to commend
the deputies to the princes. Calvin's Catechism was not fitted
for the purpose. The Augsburg Confession was spoken of, and
Beza declared himself altogether in favour of its adoption, with
the exception of the article on the Lord's Supper; and even this
he was ready to admit, according to the interpretation given by
Melancthon.
A.D. 1555-8.] CONVENTION PROPOSED. 301
This was sufficient : letters of introduction were given him to
the Elector Palatine^ to the Landgrave Philip, to the Count-
Palatine Wolfgang, and the Duke Christopher, at Wiirtem-
berg. These princes promised to intercede for the persecuted
brethren. The desired object was therefore attained. But al-
though the confession above-mentioned was given in the name
of the French church only, the Zurichers still found cause for
quarrel. The Lutherans had certainly the good intention of lead-
ing the Reformed to the Augsburg Confession ; and Calvin per-
haps, having a higher end in view, would not have refused to
yield in this respect. He had ever in his thoughts the infinite
evil of schism. But Bullinger adhered to his extreme views, and
would not go to Worms. Calvin, not unfairly, found fault with
this conduct. By being present at Worms, Bullinger might have
prevented the condemnation of the Zwinglians. Melancthon,
though earnestly admonished by Bullinger, was so perplexed,
after refusing to condemn the Zwinglians, the followers of
Osiander, and the Majorists, that he subsequently published a
statement, in which he declared that he rejected the Zwinglian
system, and condemned all teachers who opposed the Augsburg
Confession.
This unfortunate issue of the convention at Worms, which
tended to fix Bullinger more firmly in his views, did not dis-
hearten Calvin. He desired that a Colloquy might be held for
the purpose of uniting parties against the views of the Zurichers.
Bullinger, on the contrary, opposed the interests of union; but
the brethren of Basel were, in the end, induced to join with Cal-
vin. Sulzer was wholly in favour of union, in opposition to the
narrow views of the Zwinglians. Thus a secret antipathy was
created between Zurich and Basel, which displayed itself con-
spicuously on the publication of the Helvetic Confession. Hence
it is probable that Calvin would have done better for the interests
of the church at large, had he, together with the French Reformed
congregations, allied himself with Germany, and subscribed the
Augsburg Confession, without demanding any explanation of the
tenth article. Their fundamental principles were the same. Cal-
vin was himself a Lutheran, in the same way as the thoughtful
Lutherans are Calvinists ; and had the union of which we have
spoken taken place, the development of the church would have
had another direction. Bullinger, in this case, exhibited a de-
spotic anxiety, as Luther had before a stormy despotism. But
Calvin's truthfulness, which was not recognised as it ought to
302 THE LUTHERAN AND SWISS CHURCHES. [CHAP. VII.
have been, held him back*. "You have nothing to fear as to
my doing anything injurious to our close alliance. If we should
be summoned to a Colloquy, I will attend, as I have already said,
not for the purpose of seeking new friends, and leaving you, my
old ones, to yourselves, but to win new opponents for us both.
Whether I go or not, it will be my care not only not to concede
anything which is contrary to my faith, but to adhere to our
6 Consensus' with all possible resolution. Threats affect me not ;
for nothing can be more agreeable to me than the thought of lea-
ving this world, to say nothing of this city, as soon as possible/5
The Protestant princes having discovered at Worms how little
union existed among their theologians, had reassembled them at
Frankfort (1558) in order to effect a reconciliation. The Wit-
tenbergers, guided by Melancthon, were more moderate on
this occasion ; and Melancthon and some others entered into
a correspondence with Bullinger and Calvin. The Reformed
expressed themselves again, at Frankfort, in the strongest man-
ner on the presence of the Lord in the sacrament. The fol-
lowers of Flacius, on the other hand, still raved, asserting that
it was Zwingli's and Calvin's, and not Luther's doctrine, which
was asserted. Deputies from the French churches also ap-
peared there again with Beza : the latter had only just risen
from a bed of sickness. They earnestly implored help for the
persecuted, and warned their hearers not to allow themselves to
be deceived by the Cardinal Guise of Loraine, who pretended
that the embassy would avail nothing with the king of France,
and that he would, without its interference, suppress the persecu-
tions, which were then at the height. Beza gained his end. They
also begged to be allowed to hold a friendly conference on the dis-
puted points with the German theologians. All seemed to promise
tranquillity, when it was heard that the Duke of Wiirtemberg had
published an edict, banishing all who adhered to the Zwinglian
doctrine from his dominions. This intelligence excited the great-
est astonishment.
Somewhat later, that is in May 1560, Calvin again expressed
his profound agreement with Bullinger, remarking that there was
nothing to hope from the mimickers of Luther f.
At the same time (1560), two deputies from the Waldensian
churches in Bohemia arrived at Geneva : they were also anxious
to establish some point of union. Calvin, to whom they brought
* Calvin to Bullinger, May 22, 1558. Hess, s. 395. Buchar, t. vi. p. 239-
f MS. Gen. Dc Lutheri Simiis.
A.D. 1555-8.] THE POLES AND WALDENSES. 303
a letter, dated May 11, from the chief presbyter of the brother-
hood at Carmel, received them with open arms*.
Some years before (1557), a misunderstanding had arisen be-
tween the Waldenses and the other Protestants in Poland. Cal-
vin had admonished both parties to cultivate peace ; there being
at the time three sections disputing with each other on the sub-
ject of the sacrament ; the one Lutheran, the other Waldensian,
and the third taking a middle course. It is said, in a letter to
Bullinger, that John a Lasco was too violent against these Wal-
denses. Calvin thought it right to warn him not to separate them
from communion.
He now answered the brethren in a friendly, heartfelt letter,
abounding in admirable thoughts on the communion of Christians
in Christ. This epistle indeed affords a noble proof of the joy
which he felt in union, and at the same time throws considerable
light on the relations existing between the churches of the north.
It was Calvin's opinion that these Waldenses might be very
useful in aiding the diffusion of the Gospel, and he was anxious
therefore to retain them in communion with the church ; but they
had now separated themselves from the Polish Reformed, be-
cause they saw that they were continually engaged in theological
strife. " If Satan has flung Stancarus and Blandrata among
them, is it not your duty to hasten to the succour of the brethreu
in Poland ? If you neglect them, they will, sooner or later, for-
sake you. The cause of this controversy and of your separa-
tion is the dispute existing respecting the communication of the
flesh and blood of Christ. Two things have distressed you :
the first, that we wrote complaining that }rour confession was, on
account of its brevity, obscure, and likely to excite doubt; and,
secondly, that the apology which you set forth was much too
violent against those who wish for the light of a sound exposi-
tion, in the words where you say, ' The bread is the body of
Christ.' You are well-aware of what Melancthon thinks on this
point; but honouring as we do his memory, we would not cm-
ploy the respect due to his name to overthrow our opponents;
we only desire to show how unfairly they act who appeal to the
Augsburg Confession, when they differ altogether from its au-
thor. Your formulary can only be adopted with danger; it
would give occasion to great disturbance among the Poles. If
your deputy answer, that I have also exhibited great heat in my
writings, I do not deny this in the whole ; but it is not the right
* Ed. Laus. Ep. :«.>4. Ed. Amst, p. 145.
304 CHURCH AT STRASBURG. [CHAP. VII.
time to bring such an accusation. I may indeed have attacked
some unclean dogs rather severely ; but your apology has had a
very different aim. It has confused and condemned, without
distinction, many pious and learned men, with the most aban-
doned." Calvin concludes his epistle in a quiet and friendly
style, praying those to whom it was addressed not to take what
he had said amiss, and hoping that the Genevese would receive
a warning if they failed.
In the summer of 1554, Calvin heard that the Reformed church
at Strasburg was in clanger : his affection for the old congrega-
tion, which he himself had established, was awakened anew ; and
of little importance as this circumstance may seem, we must
speak of it, since even what was in itself trifling in his life had
a peculiar character. He wrote to Marbach in Strasburg, saying,
that his anxiety would no longer allow him to remain silent*. He
spoke in the same manner to Farelf. Some people at Strasburg
had interested themselves for Servetus, and had spoken against
both the punishment of heretics and the doctrine of election.
Calvin had therefore addressed a letter to one of the resident
ministers in Strasburg: his language is strong, patient but
energetic, as it was likely to be when he believed himself unjustly
assailed J.
Peter Martyr spoke with similar severity against Zwingli, the
son of the Swiss reformer, from Strasburg; stating that false
opinions were preached in that city on the subject of election,
and on the capital punishment of heretics. He agreed on both
points with Calvin ; but the schism was mainly caused by dis-
putes on the subject of the sacrament. The second minister had
attacked both the stated doctrine and his associate Gamier, who
defended it. Five of the congregation had dissented, and ac-
cused the first pastor : they were protected by the Lutherans.
It was intended to depose the obnoxious pastor from his office.
Calvin prayed for him and for the peace of the church. The
council succeeded in restoring tranquillity. At the time of the
Interim, which was adopted in Strasburg, the congregation had
exhibited considerable firmness. The accused pastor was at
length obliged to yield, and in the year 1555 Calvin wrote to
Martyr — "The breaking up of the little French congregation
afflicts me in no slight degree." He exhorts him to reinstate
* Ed. Laus. Ep. 177- Ed. Arast. p. 84, b. Cal. Sept. 1554.
f MS. Gen. Nov. 1, 1554.
X Ed. Laus. Ep. 189- Ed. Amst. p. 85.
A.D. 1555-8.] CHURCH AT STRASBURG. 305
the church, and remarks that he would find faithful supporters
in Sturmius and Sleidan. Sleidan, the well-known historian of
this period, was one of the chief men in the congregation ; Cal-
vin carried on a confidential correspondence with him, and their
letters express a very rash and startling judgement on Me-
lancthon*.
Peter Martyr soon after left Strasburg, went to Zurich, and
the Lutheran party was victorious. In 1563, Zanchius, tor-
mented by Marbach, laid down his office and removed to Grau-
biinden, where he became minister. In the same year the c For-
mula Concordia?,' or ( Consensus Argentinensis,' for the settle-
ment of doctrine, was drawn up at Strasburg and subscribed by
all the churches. But on the 19th of August, the French re-
formed church, as not agreeing with the confession thus esta-
blished, wras dispersed : it subsequently however revived.
The dissent of Tossanus, minister in Miimpelgard, was also
treated by Calvin as one of the sad consequences of this quarrel.
He suspected him of being imbued with the errors of Servetus,
and some time after spoke of his follies to Philip of Hesse. It
appears from the letter which he wrote on this occasion, that
Tossanus invited preachers from Geneva, prepared of his own
accord the ' Consensus Pastorum/ and exercised a control over
ministers inconsistent with christian brotherhood. The prince
was exhorted (i not to let one by violence appropriate to himself
the command over others f"
We ask now, What had Calvin gained for unity at this period
by his zealous, noble struggles ? It Mas the general establish-
ment of the church, as far as it was then possible, and the tri-
umph of the Wittenberg 'Concordia' in Switzerland, effected by
the renewal of the ' Consensus' in the years 1551 (?) and 1554.
We cannot indeed better conclude the account of the three con-
troversies above-described than b}^ again quoting the noble sen-
timents which Calvin addressed to Laski : — " Fain would I that
such a harmony reigned among all the churches of Christ in this
world, that the angels might sing to us from heaven J !"
* In a letter from Calvin to Sleidan, Aug. 155 l, Ed. Amst. p. 85, we read
the following: " In summis capitibus philosophis so venditana sanara doctri-
narn oppugnat, — vcl ne in se quorundam exeitet odia, Bensum Buum astute,
saltern parum ingenue tegit. 1 taminus eum fortiore spiritu instruat, ne gravem
ex ejus timiditate jacturam sentiat posteritas."
f MS. Gen. Calv. Farello, May 18, 1556. J Ruchat, vi. 55S.
VOL.
306 AGITATION AT GENEVA. [CHAP. VIII.
CHAPTER VIII.
FINAL STRUGGLE AGAINST THE LIBERTINES. BERTHELIER.
TRIUMPH OP DISCIPLINE. FAILURE OF CALVIN5S
ENEMIES. EDUCATIONAL PLANS.
Having given a connected view of the disputes concerning doc-
trine, we now enter upon a period rich in all respects in evan-
gelical operations. Calvin had reached by his perseverance the
grand end of his activity, which never, as was the case ^Yith
Luther in his latter years, declined, his spirit growing no weaker
by the conflicts in which it was engaged. His fundamental prin-
ciples ever urged him to seek the unity of the church. In the
first period of his career he laboured to exhibit a correct system
of doctrine, and in the second he employed his energies in effect-
ing the security of that which he had thus accomplished by
means of church discipline, and the c Consensus Tigurinus/
But this reference to the concluding aera of his labours brings
him before us engaged in a new conflict with his opponents at
Geneva. They were at length however subdued ; so that the
reformer gained time to nourish his church at home, and yet to
extend his influence to Scotland and Poland, and to keep the
evangelical church in France on a firm foundation, till he was
called away to his rest, in the midst of the storm caused by the
wars of the Huguenots.
It is necessary to take a brief review of the troublous year
1553. Calvin was so firmly fixed in the feeling of duty that he
watched carefully the course of public events. It was in this
year that he published his Commentary on St. John, and dedi-
cated the work to the council. In the preface he extols the
members for having so hospitably entertained the persecuted
strangers who had found refuge in Geneva, and exhorts them to
remain superior to all barkings and tumults.
But fresh clouds were gathering about his head. Since the
affair with Bolsec, Bern had been at constant strife with Geneva.
The revolutionary party raised its head ; the ministers were ex-
cluded from the council*; and the French refugees were for-
bidden to carry weapons f. Perrini had resolved to overthrow
* February 4, 1553. t April 11, 1553.
A.D. 1553.] BERTHELIER AND PERRiNI. 307
the newly-established system of church-discipline, and with it
the power of Calvin. Servetus was at this time in prison ; Cal-
vin was occupied with the process against him ; and now it was
that Philip Berthelier, the son of the Berthelier who lost his head
in the cause of freedom in 1518, made his appearance. He was
very much beloved by the people on account of his father's me-
mory; but in 1552 his disorderly life occasioned his expulsion
from the number of communicants, and the magistrates ordered
him to be cast into prison. In the month of August he made
an appeal to the council, and desired it to reverse the sentence
of the consistory. The state protocol shows that he entertained
no friendly feeling towards Calvin. If his reasonings had been
admitted, all excommunicated persons would have pursued the
same course, the council would have assumed the entire govern-
ment of the church, and Calvin's work would have been abor-
tive. Berthelier had many adherents in the council. They pro-
posed that a minister should be summoned to the assembly and
absolve the offenders in its presence. Calvin, greatly excited,
proved by the most powerful arguments that the council ought
to be the defender, and not the disturber of the sacred laws of
the church. He even assembled all the ministers both of the
city and country, and proceeded with them on a subsequent day
to the council, before which each of them solemnly protested
against the contemplated injury; and all declared that, rather
than suffer it, they would lay down their office and leave their
churches. But the party of the libertines rose tumultuously and
gained the victory. " The consistory," they exclaimed, " wished
to assume to itself the authority which belonged to the civil
magistrates."
This affair was now brought before the " Council of Two
Hundred," and it was decided that the council had in reality
the right to hear complaints like those referred to, and to ab-
solve. Berthelier was acquitted, and received a document ac-
cordingly, sealed with the seal of the republic. Perrini believed
that he had now triumphed ; that Calvin would either not obey
the decree, and so would be judged as a rebel, or that he would
yield, and that in such case the power of the consistory would
be for ever gone : but he had to do with a man whose energy
was of a very different kind to his. In such moments Calvin
exhibited the entire greatness of his mind, and the shallow cri-
tics who describe him as a mere cold reasoner merit supreme
contempt.
x2
308 BERTHELIER AND PERRINI. [CHAP. VIII.
It was on the Friday before the first Sunday in September,
when the whole reformed church celebrates the Lord's Supper,
that Calvin received information of the plan against him. He
instantly requested the syndics to summon a meeting of the
council. He hastened thither himself, and in an earnest address
endeavoured to convince those who were present, that it was
their duty to revoke the decree. He concluded with protesting
that he was resolved to die rather than disgrace the celebration
of the Lord's Supper in so unworthy a manner : " For nothing,"
he said, u can be worse than your proposing to let this man sport
with the church, and thus excite others, by the impunity which
he enjoys, to the same insolence." The council however an-
swered that it would change nothing in its decree. Calvin ac-
cordingly formed in his heart the resolution to leave the city, or
rather he saw himself exposed to a second banishment. The
important Sunday now arrived, September 3rd : the reformer
ascended the pulpit ; his ardent eloquence was employed on the
holy mysteries, and on those who despised them. At the end
of his discourse he raised his voice, and admonished the con-
gregation to receive the sacrament with holy earnestness. He
spoke with great force against those who despised the sacred
rite, and, imitating the example of Chrysostom, declared that he
would give the sacrament to none of those who were excommu-
nicated ; and that, if any one among them should attempt to
seize the bread of the Lord by force, he would do so at his peril.
Then lifting up his hand, he exclaimed, " I will lose my life rather
than let this hand give the holy things to those who have been
pronounced despisers of God." These words sounded like a
thunder-clap, striking the excommunicated and his associates to
the earth. Wonderfully affected himself, Perrini secretly advised
Berthelier not to approach the Lord's table ; and the holy sup-
per, Beza relates, was celebrated in the profoundest silence, and
with a holy awe, as if God himself had been visibly present in
the assembly.
In the afternoon of the same day Calvin preached another ser-
mon, and in pursuing the text on which he was discoursing, the
twentieth chapter of the Acts of the Apostles lay before him.
In referring to the admirable address in which Paul took leave
of the church at Ephesus, Calvin appealed to his congregation
with the words, " ' Watch, and remember, that by the space of
three years I ceased not to warn every one night and day with
tears; and now, brethren, I commend you to God, and to the
A.D. 1553.] CALVIN AND THE COUNCIL. 309
word of his grace.' " " I am not," he continued, " the man
either to contend against authority myself, or to excite others to
do so." He then exhorted the congregation to persevere in the
doctrine which he had preached to them, declaring that he was
always ready to serve the church, and every individual member
of it. " But," added he, in conclusion, " affairs here are now in
such a state that I know not whether this may not be the last
time that I shall proclaim to you the word of God ; for those
who have the power in their hands wish to compel me to do a
thing which is not lawful before God ; therefore must I say to
you, as Paul said to the elders at Ephesus, e I commend you,
dear brethren, to the grace of God*/" These words made a
deep impression on the assembly ; they terrified the enemies of
Calvin and confirmed his friends. The next day he appeared
with all the ministers and the other members of the consistory
before the lesser council, and before that of the " Two Hundred,"
in order to ask permission to be heard by the great council : the
question concerned a law which that body had sanctioned.
Calvin's request was not granted ; but a very different feeling
had arisen, and resort was had for the moment to the practice
allowed by the " Council of Two Hundred," of adjourning the
meeting. It was announced in the mean time that the opinion
of the cantons, on the laws of discipline, should be collected,
and that, till this was done, things should remain as they were.
All these proceedings took place during the trial of Servetus.
Calvin acquainted Bullinger with them in a letter, dated October
25 ; shortly, that is, before the execution of Servetus, but to whom
there is only a cursory allusion. He had already said to Gualter,
who was there, that he was prepared to die rather than cast the
holy bread to dogs, who, in despite of the Gospel, had auda-
ciously resolved upon treading underfoot the order of tin1
churches t-
The storm passed over, but it gathered again about the head
of Farel : he accompanied Servetus, as we have seen, to the place
of execution. Soon after this he hastened again to Geneva, in
order to bridle by his influence, by his powerful discourse, and
* Ed. Laus. Ep. 102. Ed. Amst. p. 78. An allusion ia made t<> the above
discourse in a letter which Calvin wrote to Bullinger, and from which it ap-
pears that it was written by a short-hand writer a- he delivered it. The ma-
nuscript probably exists at Zurich ; since Calvin referred Bullinger to the
sermon itself, quam Beza noater vertendam curavit.
t He spoke somewbat later on the same subject, expressing bis inward
convictions of duty, and saying that he would remain, out of pity ti» his church,
which would otherwise be ruined. MS. Tig. Feb. 1 I. 1554.
310 FAREL ACCUSED. [CHAP. VIII.
the respect due to his age, the fury of Calvin's opponents. He
ascended the pulpit : all hastened to hear him : he assailed them
with the mighty eloquence which he had always ready at com-
mand, exhibited the antagonist party in its true light, and then
departed. His discourse however was skilfully represented by
the disaffected as a gross injustice against them, and they con-
strained the council to furnish them with a letter for Neuchatel,
to compel Farel to answer their complaint in his own person.
Calvin considered it advisable for him to yield to their demand.
The old man accordingly set out on foot, alone and in the rough-
est autumnal weather, on his way to Geneva. Calvin dare not
let him preach. There was a general excitement. The tumult
in the senate-house was so great when the accusation was formally
made, that the hostile party exclaimed, that Farel must be flung
into the Rhone. A young and courageous man now stepped
forth, and warned Perrini to take care that the father of the city
suffered no harm. Another young man soon joined him ; and
when the people began to collect about the council-chamber, the
ministers appeared in a body, and admonished the council to
defend the honour of God and his word. Justice demanded a
loud protest in behalf of Farel.
A general tumult pervaded the place : the citizens and work-
people left their homes to defend their ministers. The accusers
became alarmed, and were obliged to submit to terms. Calvin,
Viret and others, now explained the wicked designs of their
enemies. Farel defended himself in a lengthened address, and
upheld the truth. In the registers of the republic it is stated,
that Farel declared that he had no intention to blame the city,
but that, on the contrary, he cherished a sincere love for Geneva.
This speech deeply affected the auditory. Among those who
had forced their way into the presence of the council, were many
who had taken part against Farel ; but all now proclaimed that
they believed him to be a true servant of the Gospel, and their
spiritual father. Upon this the council commanded that every
one should give him his hand, and that a feast should be held in
token of the general reconciliation. The first syndic was now
obliged to declare, with trembling, that Farel's sermon was holy;
that nothing could be fairly said against him ; that his opponents
must be reconciled to him, and that every one must live accord-
ing to the word of God. The libertines hereby discovered that
they had not the mass of the people with them, and Perrini
humbled himself before Farel.
A.D. 1553.] PACIFICATION OF GENEVA. 311
Thus this troublous year, in which the church had also to lament
the death of King Edward of England, ended prosperously for
Geneva. The question respecting discipline was still debated ;
but the agitation thereby created was only the forerunner of much
greater evils. On the eve of the year 1554, Calvin expressed to
Bullinger his sorrowful feelings : his position was almost un-
bearable. The days had arrived when he felt indeed that it was
not without cause that he had trembled, when Farel pressed it
upon him as a duty to return to Geneva, and when he exclaimed,
Cor nieum velut mactatum Deo in sacrificium offero, ee I offer my
bleeding heart as a sacrifice to God." On the 1st of January
another great feast was celebrated : Calvin was present : the
magistrates and the members of the lesser council also attended.
" If any one disturbs the peace," it was then said, " let all rise
against him." On the 2nd of February, 1554, the people took
an oath, with upraised hands, that they would live for the future
according to the teaching of the reformers ; that they would re-
frain from all malice, forget the past, and invoke the vengeance
of God upon the houses, persons, wives and children of those
who should violate this holy vow. On the 23rd of the same
month Calvin wrote to Bullinger: "The good citizens have not
had sufficient courage to bring the affairs of the church into
order, the want of which was the first cause of this agitation.
They have satisfied themselves with shaking hands in token of
reconciliation, and with proclaiming on oath that they will no
longer support injustice. Thus under the pretence of promoting
peace, they have set aside church order, the only sure foundation
of peace. I was called to the council-chamber, and there declared
that I forgave all who felt true repentance ; that I, however, was
not the consistory ; and that I would rather die a hundred times
than claim for myself an authority which belonged to the whole
church, the right, that is, of establishing rules of discipline. The
enemy has made at present but little uproar ; it will soon be ne-
cessary however to renew the conflict."
Calvin was not mistaken : the evil became greater than he
had feared. Complaints were again made to the council re-
specting the determination of the consistory, and the elders were
obliged to appear before the former to defend themselves. Jus-
tice was so little regarded*, that the first syndic this year, who
required satisfaction for an injury done him, could obtain none
* Ruchat, t. v. p. 116.
312 RENEWAL OF STRIFE. [CHAP. VIII.
7
from the council, and he openly declared that he would seek
justice of the citizens themselves, from door to door. Calvin
was now attacked in his own person. It has been already men-
tioned, that the council, in August 1554, had received a long
letter under a strange name, containing fearful accusations
asainst Calvin. It was communicated to him, and he believed
that it came from Castellio. We have spoken of the numerous
insults heaped upon him ; but no mention has yet been made of
the circumstance, that as he was once returning from St.Gervais,
where he had been preaching, a number of miscreants attacked
him on the bridge over the Rhone. He answered their threats
by quietly remarking, that the bridge was broad enough for them
all. They then directed their rage against a French refugee,
whom they pursued to his own shop, and wounded him. The
people assembled ; swords were drawn and blood flowed. Many
cried aloud, "Murder, murder the foreigner!" Similar occur-
rences took place day after day. Another time, when Calvin was
going to give his lecture he was publicly insulted, and his ser-
vant was beaten in the open street.
The admonitions of the consistory were utterly despised, and the
magistrates were slow to punish offences. They indulged them-
selves, on the other hand, in the language of threat, when engaged
in public business, as if they were the lords of the state. Efforts
were made to abolish the moral judicature, and blasphemy and
adultery triumphed. The endeavours made to resist this state of
things proved fruitless. One of its licentious opponents dared
to say to the consistory, that it was more savage than Satan him-
self, but that it would soon cease to be so. " See/' said some
other libertines, " how we are governed by the French edicts and
by Calvin ! " Often at night some fresh attack was made upon
the foreigners, and they were cruelly beaten. Calvin reproved
the offenders with the whole might of his pulpit eloquence ; but
the council, which considered his vehemence unseasonable, called
him into its presence, and besought him to moderate his zeal.
The old Genevese citizens united in opposing the admission of
the strangers to equal civil rights ; and had obtained a law, by
which it was ordained, that no foreigner should be eligible for
election into the great council, till he had been resident twenty-
five years.
It was at this period that the refugees, who had settled in We-
sel, Emden and Frankfort, occasioned Calvin so much anxiety
A.D. 1555.] RENEWAL OF STRIFE. 313
About the same time also he received a letter from Peter Mar-
tyr, at Strasburg, May 9, 1554, stating that Philip of Spain had
been acknowledged as king in England; that popery was re-
established in that country, and that holy men and believers were
obliged on all sides to seek safety by flight. " I write this," says
Martyr, " that you and your church may, in these unhappy cir-
cumstances, afford help by your prayers." And further, " I do not
wish it to be hidden from you, that I and many pious people are
in the highest degree troubled, that so many perverse and false
reports should have sprung up, both against the truth and against
your name, in reference to God's eternal election, and the punish-
ment of heretics."
Nothing indeed but the invincible strength of this man, who
had no worldly object of desire, could have resisted the stream of
corruption now ilowing, or have upheld the rights of the church
against it. Beza states that the revolutionary party made obscene
songs on the word of God. It was during 1553, and the two
following years, that this rebellious feeling reached its height. One
night in Januarv 1555, the streets were illuminated, and a mock
procession took place, in which the hymns of the church were
ridiculed in vulgar parodies*. At this time also it was reported
by Beza, that the king of France had commanded the duke of
Guise to make himself master of Geneva. The fortifications
were accordingly carefully repaired, and the Waldensian refugees
were employed in the work. But this gave rise to new disturb-
ances. Perrini, as general of the forces of the little republic,
employed himself in circulating a statement, that the Genevese
French were in league with the enemy, and that if they agreed
with him, the king would admit them to his favour; they ought
therefore, he said, to be watched and examined, and to be sub-
jected to an annual tax. The position was one of difficulty for a
small city. There was an enemy at the gates, and there were
factions within the walls. Calvin rightly said, that if the church
was everywhere disturbed, in the case of Geneva it was tossed
to and fro like the ark in the deluge. But he observed to Yiret,
" that he bore all this in silence." If he was now engaged in
forming plans against the libertines, as some writers suppose, he
would certainly have quietly intimated it to his friends ; but he
speaks only of his troubles. Before the commencement of the de-
cisive year 1555, we hear him pouring out his deep sighs, and ex-
* An account of these proceedings is given in the registers of the republic,
Jan. 0, 1553.
314 RENEWAL OF STRIFE. [CHAP. VIII.
pressing, like Melancthon, his wish to die* : he uttered the same
feelings at a somewhat later period f.
But in the year above-mentioned, this fierce struggle respecting
discipline was brought to a happy close. The libertines them-
selves contributed by their turbulence to this result J. On January
24th, a few days after the procession to which we have alluded,
the "Council of Two Hundred" being assembled, the ministers
were summoned to attend for the purpose of stating, as they had
desired, their views on the important question of discipline. The
inquiry wras not about excommunication itself, but the tribunal
by which it was to be pronounced. The edicts which had been
confirmed by the great council, the chief authority in the state, on
the return of Calvin, had placed the right of inflicting excommuni-
cation in the hands of the consistory alone. That body accordingly
pronounced sentence upon incorrigible offenders without appeal.
The council had endeavoured to appropriate this right to itself,
because it was inconceivably inconsistent, it said, that the govern-
ment of a state should be without the power of revising whatever
decrees were passed. The consistory pretended to the rank of a
sovereign tribunal in the state ; but sound reason demanded, that
for the safe guardianship of freedom, the entire power and rule
should be in the hands of the civil magistrate. It was well known
what tyranny the popes exercised under the pretence of this spi-
ritual jurisdiction.
To these insinuations the clergy answered by Calvin, "that it
was the duty of men to submit themselves to the authority of
Christ and his Apostles, to whom He had given the power to
loose and to bind, and to administer the sacraments." It was
also added, " that the magistrate had no more right to oppose
himself to spiritual discipline, than the clergy had to intermeddle
with the determinations of a temporal judge. It wras their duty
therefore to see that the sacraments suffered no dishonour ; that
since the clergy, as subjects, yielded entire obedience to the ma-
gistrates, all persons of rank and authority ought to bow them-
selves implicitly to the word of God ; that pious princes have
ever made this distinction ; that at the very founding of the
church, Aaron received the high-priesthood ; David did not sa-
crifice ; the Lord severely punished those who despised his law
in this respect ; Uzzah died because he laid his hand upon the
ark ; and King Hoseah was covered with leprosy ; that the
* Calvin to Wolf, 7 Cal. Jan. 1555. t Ed. Laus. Ep. 2i6, Oct. 10, 1555.
f Ruchat, vi. p. 133.
A.D. 1555-60.] THE COUNCIL AND CONSISTORY. 315
laws were a sufficient defence against any abuse of authority on
the part of the consistory ; and that freedom, if Christ was ba-
nished, would be but a lamentable servitude." This reasoning
made an impression upon the minds of people, and it was de-
termined by a majority of votes, that all the edicts passed by the
great council must have the authority of law ; whence it followed,
that church discipline must remain solely in the hands of the
consistory.
While all the friends of peace were rejoicing that this victory
had been gained for religion and morality, the rabble, weakened
and restrained by the ministers and their powerful discourses,
were loud in exclaiming that preaching ought to be suppressed,
and the number of ministers reduced to two ; that these should
be confined to the reading of Scripture, without interpretation ;
that the people should be taught the " Credo," the u Lord's
Prayer," and the "Ten Commandments ;" that it was not only
useless but dangerous to allow so much expounding ; and taking
advantage of the Bernese remonstrance on the doctrine of pre-
destination, they added, that it was unnecessary to print so
many books and commentaries.
A still greater feeling of indignation was expressed, when the
council at one sitting admitted fifty foreigners, known for their
respectability, to the rights of citizenship. It was necessary to
make a bold experiment. Amy Perrini and Peter Vandel,
members of the council, directed the chief of the police to ap-
pear before the lesser council, that a complaint might be made
to him, in the name of the people, respecting the admission of
these foreigners to the rank of citizens ; a measure which dis-
quieted the city, and rendered it necessary to bring the subject
before the "Council of Two Hundred." The council, however,
would not allow such a proceeding. Perrini returned the next
day with a larger number of his tumultuous followers : he was
sent away, with the charge to keep himself quiet. The people
now spread themselves about in the low drinking-houses, and
gave free expression to their wrath. This happened on a Sun-
day, May 14. Calvin, expecting some great event, commended
himself to the prayers of Fare!. On the following Tuesday,
May 1G, the malcontents returned in still greater numbers to
the council-house ; they were accompanied by fishermen and
sailors, and were armed with huge double-handed swords. Their
demands were the same as before, and they were again sent back.
They continued to perambulate the whole city, and fresh crowds
316 AGITATION AT GENEVA, [CHAP. VIII.
of the lower class were induced to join them. To secure their
aid, they distributed food to the work-people and the poor, and
commended the city to their care, lest it should fall into strange
hands. The more moderate among them desired an assembly
of the great council, but they were overpowered by the violence
of the rest, who seem to have formed the design of killing the
refugees, and those who espoused their cause. The following
Sunday was the time appointed for this deed ; but the violence
of some of the party, and their too great haste to accomplish
their design, happily defeated the plan. On the following night,
a member of the council named Baudichon, accompanied by
two young burghers, made the circuit of the city : they were
greatly hated, as well-known champions of the persecuted refu-
gees. In the course of their rounds they were met by a crowd
of the disaffected, who, on perceiving Baudichon, instantly shout-
ed, " Down with the traitor," and drew their swords. Hearing
the cry, the syndic Aubert hastened to the spot with his staff of
office, and ordered one of the leaders to be arrested ; but his staff
was wrenched from his hand, he was surrounded by the rabble,
and the cry became general, " Treason, — the French, — kill,
slay, — the French are seizing the city !" But not one of the re-
fugees was to be seen. " The Lord," says Calvin, " had poured
a deep sleep upon them." The whole city was soon under arms,
without knowing why. Vandel's wife ran about the Bourg de
Four, exclaiming, " The French are taking the city : up, and
murder them all." When Baudichon reached his house, the
crowd assembled around it, and shouted, " The French are there,
all armed." But the tumult passed over without bloodshed ;
and Perrini's plan was defeated. Still, the malcontents hoped
to effect their grand design of bringing about a revolution.
Aubert the syndic lost no time in summoning the council :
it met that very night ; the syndics proceeded, at its command,
from street to street, and ordered the people to retire to their
homes. In many places this command was disregarded. Van-
del, seeing that his orders were useless, appeared in person to
quiet the excited multitude. The next day an order was issued
by the council prohibiting the people from meeting in crowds.
In the following week the " Two Hundred" met, in order to
communicate with the council on the subject of these occurrences.
When Amied Perrini saw that he was exposed to the danger of
a judicial investigation, and that exemplary punishments would
be inflicted on the guilty, without respect to persons, he withdrew
A.D. 1555-60.] AGITATION AT GENEVA. 31 7
to his country-seat, in the canton of Bern, whither he was fol-
lowed by Vandelj Philibert Berthelier, and many others. They
were publicly summoned before the magistrates ; some of the
party appeared, and were slightly punished. Four however of
the worst of the malcontents were beheaded. They protested
that they did not die as traitors ; that they had had no thought of
treason ; and that their sole object had been to prevent the admis-
sion of the new burghers, hoping thereby to defend the city
against foreigners. But this policy of the libertines appeared to
the government, as Rucliat remarks, highly dangerous. ' The
practice of recruiting itself by the admission of new citizens was
necessary to Geneva, as to all little states. Geneva, moreover,
was so circumstanced, that the strangers would soon have become
more powerful than the old burghers, if they had not been thus
incorporated with them. Bern interested itself in the case of the
fugitives, but in vain. On the 3rd of June they were pronounced
rebels and traitors, and condemned to lose their heads ; the sen-
tence was executed in effigy. It was now determined that the
existence of a captain-general was dangerous to the little repub-
lic, and the office was abolished.
Three letters from Calvin to Bullinger throw additional light
on these occurrences. One, which is printed, gives a striking ac-
count of the whole affair; another, unprinted, begins with his
defence against the accusation that he was present at the torture
of one of the criminals. Hence it appears that Calvin did not
busy himself, as his vilifiers wish it to be supposed, in proceed-
ings of this kind ; it was only as a minister that he visited the
prison, and when called by the malefactors themselves. He was
accustomed to speak with the utmost confidence to Bullinger,
but not a word occurs in his letters to justify the accusations of
his enemies. Instead of pronouncing anathemas upon the cri-
minals, as it was wickedly said he did, these unfortunate people
placed their full trust in him as their spiritual adviser. The let-
ters show what the accused confessed, and what they retracted.
Calvin questioned some of them at the moment when they were
being led to execution*.
The friends of Bolsec, at Bern, gladly seized this opportunity
* This was especially the case with regard to two brothers. Having ques-
tioned one of them particularly, he concluded by asking him, whether he had
ever attempted to force anything from him by threats or promises ; to which
the young man replied that nothing of this kind had been done. Speaking of
the criminals generally, he says that there was not one of them who did not, by
his silence, confess the greater part of his guilt.
318 calvin's successes. [chap. viii.
of slandering Calvin. The libertines now also came to their sup-
port : to such an extent did their rancour proceed, that Calvin
exclaimed, " I see that the hatred of some against me is so great,
that they will never cease to rave till I have fallen a victim to
their malice." Speaking of Geneva, he says, " But little was
wanting to involve this city in one night, and all of us with it, in
destruction*."
But this struggle was followed by tranquillity : Calvin's
spirit prevailed, and ruled the church. Discipline was confirmed
by the common consent of the cantons. We have the testimony
of a noble eye-witness to the events of this period. Knox, who was
at Geneva in 1556, writes to his friend Locke t> " I always wished
in my heart, nor could I ever cease to wish, that it might please
God to bring me to this place, where, I can say, without fear or
shame, the best Christian school exists, since the time of the
Apostles. I allow that Christ is truly preached in other places
also, but in no other have I seen the Reformation so well wrought
out, both morally and religiously, as in Geneva." Thus Farel
also expressed his astonishment at the grace enjoyed by the
church of Geneva, which now, after such perils, flourished as an
example for other churches J. " I was lately at Geneva," he says,
"and so delighted was I, that I could scarcely tear myself away.
I would rather be last in Geneva than first in any other place :
were I not prevented by the Lord, and by my love for my con-
gregation, nothing should hinder me from ending my days there."
Drelincourt expressed the same admiration a hundred years
after.
But high now as Calvin stood, there were not wanting things
to humble him, both inwardly and outwrardly. He was subject
to frequent and severe attacks of fever : they sometimes came
upon him while in the pulpit ; and he once wrote to a friend,
saying that it was only with great trouble, and by sitting down,
that he could get through his sermon §. But he had a heavier
trial to bear : the wife of his brother Anton disgraced the
family by her infidelity. Farel observes on this, that it was good
for Calvin to encounter these humbling circumstances, " lest
his mind might be too exalted by the greatness of the reve-
lations vouchsafed him." The conflict with the libertines was
* MS. Gen. Calv. Bullingero.
t Knox, Leben von M'Crie bearbeitet von Planck, s. 235.
J Kirchhofer, ii. s. 124.
§ He speaks of this to Haller, May 9, 1556, and to Blaarer, April 13, 1557.
A.D. 1555-60.] CALVIN AND THE BERNESE. 319
not yet ended. Bern again exhibited a disposition to tyranny,
and took their part ; they stood in crowds on the Arve-bridge,
and uttered abuse of every kind against the Genevese. On one
occasion they violently attacked Viret. The efforts of the coun-
cil to induce them to depart were of no avail ; the people would
have rushed out against them, but were held back. According
to the declaration of the Bernese, the malcontents had commit-
ted no crime. The Genevese however proceeded to expel the
wives of the fugitives from the city, confiscated their possessions,
and prohibited their return on pain of death. Thus at the mo-
ment when the little state wras left to itself, it displayed the
noblest energy. The refugees were again permitted to bear arms:
Calvin and the city-secretary were to acquaint the cantons with this
circumstance. To induce the Bernese to consent to the proceed-
ing, the procurator-general of Geneva wished to lay the judicial
documents respecting the fugitives before the tribunal at Bern,
and there to appear against them* ; with this proviso, however,
that Geneva did not thereby in anywise subject itself to the
Bernese judicature. But Bern resumed the process of its own
accord ; freed the culprits from the sentence of the Genevese ; and
condemned the syndics, the council, and the city of Geneva to
afford satisfaction to the fugitives, to ask their pardon, and to pay
the costs of the trial.
It was thus that Bern treated the little republic, which seemed
destined to destruction. The fugitives proposed to assert their
right by force, and such of the Genevese as possessed any pro-
perty in the territory of Bern were exposed to daily attacks. At
length the day arrived for Geneva to plead its cause : it be-
sought the Bernese to act with greater moderation, and to renew
the old treaty, which terminated in 1556.
Calvin had continued to be hated by the Bernese since the
dispute on predestination. Bullinger wrote to him : " People
say that you wish to play the part of sole ruler in Geneva by
means of your French, and that it is you who hinder an agree-
ment with Bern." He then consoles him by citing the early
sufferings of Chrysostom and Ambrose, and gives him excellent
advice in respect to moderation, the fatherly care of Geneva, and
of the numerous refugees in the city f : — " Watch, I beseech you,
dear friend, for all : counsel all : take care of all, that nothing
* Ruchat, vi. 190.
f Hess, Leben Bullingers, t. ii. s. 259, 262, note. Oct. 1559-
320 CALVIN AND THE BERNESE. [CHAP. VIII.
may be neglected which can minister to peace and general edi-
fication. The days are evil ; God give you grace to be wise.*3
Calvin answered Bullinger in an apologetic letter. Bullinger
again promised the interference of the Zurichers ; but the whole
year 1557 passed away without anything being done. During
this period Calvin was often full of anxiety for Geneva, and
laboured much in secret to win back the minds of the people to
tranquillity. At the end of the year 1556, when the Bernese
again rudely repulsed the Genevese, Calvin once more begged
Bullinger to engage Zurich in effecting a reconciliation. This
circumstance however was kept secret, and the letter to Bullin-
ger is interesting, as connected with the history of Geneva.
The Bernese appear to have intended to weary-out Geneva
by petty agitations, till, in the hour of danger, it should throw
itself into their arms, and thus give the disaffected the means of
indulging in still greater insolence. It is evident indeed, from a
letter to Bullinger, that they had made a formal complaint against
Geneva. Calvin was anxious to learn from him, confidentially,
whether they had any hope, and he wished a letter to be addressed
to the city of Geneva. The state of affairs did not improve. In
the August of the following year Calvin complains to Bullinger*,
that their good neighbours, who, in the pulpit, spoke of the com-
munion of saints, utterly disregarded the present divisions, and
were equally indifferent to the fate of Geneva. At the end of
the year 1557 the discussion was brought to a close, but it was
not till the next year that the business was finally con eluded f.
After the victory of St. Quentin, Emanuel Philibert returned
from Savoy, at the head of his victorious band, to his own country,
and might easily have attacked Geneva. The danger thus to be
apprehended may have warned the Bernese that Savoy might
still be able to strengthen itself against them by means of Geneva.
New anxieties arose in the following year. At the end of every
letter Calvin entreats his friends to pray for Geneva J. The dis-
pute was still prolonged ; and the Genevese, on their side, acted
with characteristic violence. One of the libertine party, whom
they caught in a village, lost his head §. Their adversaries, on the
other hand, confiscated the possessions of the council, by bring-
ing them within the Bernese territory. But an invisible arm
* MS. Tig. 7 Idus Aug. 1557-
t MS. Par. Calv. Hotomanno, Jan. 10, 1558.
X MS. Bern, to Bullinger, Nov. 19, 1558.
§ Ruchat, vi. 232.
a.d. 1555-60.] fauel's marriage. 321
was upraised amid all these dangers, and in the year 15GJ Calvin
could say to Uttenhovcn, " that they had been wonderfully deli-
vered*." His feeling was one of joy; and he encouraged an-
other combatant by the suggestion, that all beginnings in the
kingdom of God are little, insignificant, and proportionally diffi-
cult f. He was again attacked by the quartan ague: the weak-
ness continued for a long time, and his patience was greatly
tried J.
It was at this juncture that the startling intelligence reached
Geneva, that Farel, now sixty-nine years of age, was just married,
and to a very young person. The astonishment expressed at
this event was great. People had been so accustomed to con-
template the old missionary daring all the dangers and difficul-
ties of his position alone, that it was difficult to view him in the
light of the father of a family. But when we consider Farel's
bold, stormy, romantic character, there is, in reality, nothing dis-
cordant in this episode. Calvin expressed himself earnestly and
characteristically in his letter on the subject to the Neuchatel
clergy § : he besought them to pardon him, in consideration of
his thirty-six years' service.
In the midst of all these disquietudes, troubles and dangers,
Calvin was intently engaged in promoting the educational ad-
vancement of Geneva. He now also published a new edition of
the i Institutes.' This was the third and last revision, and the
crowning labour of his life.
Calvin had regularly, since his return from Strasburg, delivered
three weekly theological lectures. A school was established at
Geneva from the commencement of the Reformation, and we
have already mentioned that Castellio and Cordier were early
numbered among its teachers. It was Calvin's design to esta-
blish an extensive gymnasium, and an academy especially de-
voted to the study of theology. The means to effect this object
were promised, but the little republic was too poor to fulfil its
promise, and years passed away, leaving the plan still unaccom-
plished. At length, after the treaty with Bern, the council began
* MS. Bern, May 15, 1560. " Et mirantur qui nos exitio addixerant nou
centies periisse."
f Ed. Laus. Ep. 267. Ed. Amst. p. 129.
X MS. Calvin speaks of this to a French correspondent in Feb. 1559 ; he
had alluded to an earlier attack in a letter to Bullinger, Nov. l<), L558, MS. Tig.
§ MS. Gen. Sept. 26, 1558. Kirchhofer, ii. s. L52. This author errs greatly
in supposing that Calvin favoured the marriage. " I am dumb with astonish-
ment," he says, speaking of the subject, and he alludes to Farel as his " poor
brother."
VOL. II. v
322 EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS. [CHAP. VIII.
to turn its attention to the internal affairs of the city. The noble
Bonnivard gave his whole fortune to forward the design*. In
the year 1558 the gymnasium was founded, and in the following
year the academy. A favourable circumstance promoted the
success of the undertaking. Several ministers from the Grisons,
during the dispute with Bern on the subject of excommunication,
had, after many contentions, been either banished or deprived of
their office. Among these were Peter Viret, Beza, the excellent
Augustus Marlorat, who was destined to win the martyr's crownf,
Jacobus Valier, and twenty others. They retired to Geneva,
and appealed to the council, in a body, for permission to take up
their permanent abode in that city J. Viret was made one of
the ministers of the place, as he had formerly been ; but he re-
tained the office only two years. He was invited to France ;
many of the refugees followed, those only remaining who were
invited to assist in the formation of the academy. Calvin would
fain have engaged doctors for all the various faculties, but he was
obliged to content himself with that which was absolutely neces-
sary. Beza was given him for a colleague, both as professor and
minister. The academy, as well as the school, was placed under
the government of the clergy, who elected the rector, the pro-
fessors, and teachers, but submitted their choice to the appro-
bation of the council. Calvin drew up the rules for the manage-
ment of the academy, and a confession of faith, which all stu-
dents at their matriculation were to subscribe. The plan which
he sketched out for the conduct of the professors, master, and
scholars, is altogether stamped with the character of the middle
ages. The students were to attend divine service once every
Wednesday, and three times every Sunday. In summer they
were to attend class at six in the morning; in winter at seven:
they were to breakfast in class, and at ten o'clock the teachers
were to conduct them to their homes. After dinner, that is, at
eleven o'clock, they were to return to school, and practise psalm-
singing for an hour : from one to two they were to take their
little afternoon refreshment in class. The lessons were to cease
at four o'clock, and then the scholars were to assemble in the
hall, where the rector was to be present, and dismiss them with
kindly counsel, openly censuring those who had merited the re-
prehension of their teachers. Besides divinity, and the Latin and
* Senebier, Hist. lit. t. i. p. 4S.
■f He suffered at Rouen in 1562.
X Ruchat, t. vi. p. 306.
A.D. 1555-60.] OPENING OF THE ACADEMY. 323
Greek languages, logic was to form a part of the studies in the
first class. This was necessary according to the practice of the
age, and as an introduction to the Aristotelian philosophy*.
On the 5th of June, 1559, the doors of St. Peter's church were
opened ; the magistrates entered ; the clergy assembled in a body ;
all the learned men of Geneva, all the best families of the place,
and six hundred scholars, were present. Calvin arose, and in a
speech which he delivered in French, he advocated the useful-
ness of educational institutions, and exhorted all who heard him
to pray to God for the success of theirs. Roset, the state-secre-
tary, then read the laws of the new institution, and proclaimed
the rector. This being done, Theodore Beza delivered a Latin
oration, and Calvin concluded the solemnity with a prayer. The
classes were opened the following day. A grand school-festival
is still yearly solemnized in the same church at Geneva, and at
which one of the scholars pronounces a commemorative oration.
This foundation of an academy affords sufficient proof of Cal-
vin's anxiety to unite the sciences with the church, and to sanc-
tify knowledge by faith : he was anxious also to have his young
friend Beza chosen rector of the new institution ; and he thus
showed how little desire he had for outward fame or power.
Many distinguished men have been mentioned in a former part
of this work as connected with the academy ; but the emolu-
ments attending the office were very slight, amounting only to
280 Geneva florins and a residence : so poor indeed was the city,
that in the interval between 1580-90 the institution was sup-
ported by a collection made in England, Beza having for a long
time performed the duties of all the professors, who had neces-
sarily been discharged.
It is worthy of remark, that as early as the year 157(3 it was
found expedient to dispense with the subscription to the formu-
lary of faith, originally required of the students. This measure
was adopted, that no one who sought the light might be re-
pulsed. According to the former rule, papists and Lutherans
must have for ever been deprived of sharing in the studies of the
academy.
We learn from Calvin's correspondence with what anxiety he
sought to bring learned men to Geneva. It was his early wish
to obtain the celebrated Peter Martyr for the Italian congrega-
tion, but no sufficient means existed to pay him. He however
described the place to him in the most inviting language. "That
* Picot, ii. 91.
Y 2
324 PROGRESS OF THE ACADEMY. [CHAP. VIII.
church," he says,, "is the very flower of Italy*." He thought,
probably, of Carracioli.
When the academy was properly established, he wrote to Tre-
mellius, who was then teaching at Heidelberg, and whom he
■would gladly have brought to Geneva, stating that he proposed
founding professorships for the three learned languages, but that
the stipends would be very small f. He had wished also to ob-
tain Mercerus as professor of Hebrew J, but he failed in accom-
plishing his object. He renewed the invitation October 1 7, 1563,
and begged him to leave Paris, where he then was, for Geneva §.
Martyr refused the offer of an appointment to the ministry of
the Italian congregation in 1557. Calvin said to him, that he
could forgive him, but that his countrymen were not likely to
pardon him so easily ||.
It is not necessary to repeat how great an impulse Calvin
gave, by these undertakings, to the literary advancement of the
reformed church. Certain it is, that he was indebted to the
academy, which soon became greatly frequented, for the rapid
diffusion of his doctrines in Germany, Holland, France and En-
gland. His unclassical adversaries may also be reminded, that
previous to the Reformation scarcely a distinguished man was
known at Geneva. The human mind was utterly bowed down ;
while now, on the contrary, beams of light flowed freely upon
all. Some difficulties necessarily arose, from the position of the
city ; it lay between Italy, France and Germany, and a defence
was needed against the national vices peculiar to each. The high
character of Calvin impressed upon the little republic its own
peculiar features. It is curious to observe how mean a spirit
will often prevail in states, even when they have attained to great
rank and influence. Calvin's humorous remark may be cited
in illustration of this fact. Laughing at the want of influence
exercised by the sciences on social life, he described the general
state of manners in his time by the significant term barbaries.
The contrast between the present state of the elegant city and this
description of its manners in a past age, is sufficiently striking.
We must here briefly state the circumstances which led to the
banishment of Viret and Beza, and which are not unimportant
in their relation to the history of church discipline. Bern went
back to the original Zwinglian principle, and rejected the Cal-
* MS. Gen. Jan. 18, 1555. f 4 Cal. Sept. 1558.
X MS. Gen. Mart. 16, 1558. Calv. Mercerio.
§ MS. Bern. Calv. Mercerio. || MS. Par. Oct. 13, 1557.
A.D. 1555-60.] BEZA AND VIRET. 325
vinistic : it resolved to order ecclesiastical matters accordino- to
the simple rule of civil policy ; it would recognize no church
authority, and it lost, in consequence, forty distinguished mini-
sters. Geneva, though destined to become a European city, was
treated with contempt. The little French community in the
Grisons appears to have been weak and changeable. The con-
sistory of Lausanne, therefore, addressed itself to the council of
Bern, and besought it to introduce a strong system of church
discipline, similar to that established at Geneva. This desire
was expressed in the most energetic language (1543). The
gentle Viret proved himself in this case endowed with great force
of character. The Bernese discouraged the design, and would
hear nothing of excommunication. Thus Farel in 1546 could
not settle in Lausanne. Some years passed away : the clergy
of Lausanne then addressed themselves to the council of the citv,
to direct its attention to the disorders daily occurring. Certain
laws were accordingly proposed ; but Bern was greatly displeased
at the movement, and sent a copy of its own rule, according to
which it desired Lausanne to be guided. The agitation created
by the great question concerning excommunication still con-
tinued. Some ministers, in the belief that this law, and espe-
cially the rules of discipline, were of divine institution, now gave
free course to their zeal, and hastened on the storm. The mini-
sters of Lausanne, Payerne and Thonon, were strongly Calvi-
nistic. Bern had commanded that the doctrine of predestination
should be treated with great moderation. Four ministers of
Thonon preached in the rudest style against the orders of the
council. Being deprived of their office, they went to Geneva,
and the ministers of Lausanne continued to make every effort to
establish a system of discipline. The council however would
give no heed to their representations. Viret threatened to refuse
the further administration of the sacrament : he was entreated to
yield, for he was greatly beloved, and he consented. At length
the Bernese consistory established certain rules of discipline,
but it utterly repudiated the practice of excommunication, and
of testing the faith of dissentients: it saw in things of this kind
a hateful inquisition. It still however desired to receive the
opinion of the ministers respecting the anathemas of the church.
This they regarded as a sign of success. They expressed them-
selves freely on the subject, and even added the threat, that if
their wish was not granted, they would take their departure.
The council was enraged, and twelve of the ministers were sum-
326 BEZA AND VIRET. [CHAP. IX.
moned to answer for their conduct at Bern. The magistrates
resolutely opposed them, and it was ordered that no mention
should ever be made of anathemas. Viret now again declared
to those of Lausanne, that he could no longer administer the
communion in that city, his people being distracted as they were
by so many vexations. The council answered^ that anathemas
were not the right means for quieting agitation, and that an en-
tirely pure state of the church was not to be looked for. But
Viret remained firm : the other ministers did the same. The
council, on the other hand, was settled in the conviction, that the
ministers must resign their appointments, and that if the church
suffered harm therefrom, the guilt would be theirs.
Viret paused for awhile, but he determined not to administer
the sacrament at Christmas 1 55 J, or rather to defer it. Valier
and he were accordingly banished. Many other ministers left
about the same time (1558 and 1559). The agitation in the
Grisons respecting discipline was thus prolonged. Ministers
continued to leave the district, and it is probable that many dis-
orders existed in this part of the country not known to the Ger-
man cantons. A synod was ultimately assembled to consider
the matter. The quarrel was an affair of the people. Lausanne
remained for a time without ministers. At length a severe rule
of discipline and morals was introduced : women of loose cha-
racter were thrown into prison, and offences named to the magi-
strates by the consistory were severely punished. No mention
however was made of excommunication.
CHAPTER IX.
CALVIN S ACTIVITY. HIS INFLUENCE IN ENGLAND AND
SCOTLAND. JOHN KNOX. CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE
ENGLISH EXILES TN FRANKFORT.
We have already spoken of Calvin's influence in England (1553) :
he had proposed to Cranmer the plan of a great church union.
On the death of Edward, Queen Mary destroyed the work of
that monarch, and Cranmer breathed out his life in the flames. A
great number of exiles had taken up their abode in the north of
Germany, in Frankfort and Geneva. Calvin sighs over these
A.D. 1555-60.] KNOX AT GENEVA. 327
troubles of the church in one of his letters to Buliinger. He
suppresses his opinion of Cranmer. His remark on learning the
death of Lady Jane Grey is worthy of quotation : " She has left,"
he said, " an image which deserves everlasting remembrance."
From the year 1554 we see frequently in Geneva, and in close
intercourse with Calvin, a man of the most singular appearance ;
strongly built; with a bold, severe expression of countenance;
of firm, but yet tender nature : this is the famous Scotchman,
John Knox. It might have been imagined that two such power-
ful and ardent characters as these reformers could not have agreed
well together ; but they cherished for each other a genuine affec-
tion : the one could submit himself to the other. Knox's friend-
ship with Calvin requires especial notice. He was a powerful
instrument in diffusing the principles of Calvinism in England,
Scotland, and even to a still wider extent ; but we must care-
fully keep in view the circumstances by which they were distin-
guished. Knox was the founder of the Scotch presbyterian
church, from which arose the rude, fierce spirits of a subsequent
period. He it was who confounded the holy cause of truth with
the interests of a political party; who impressed upon the Pro-
testant church in England its peculiar outward character; and
who, in this not apostolic, aroused a power which was afterwards
to exercise so mighty and destructive an influence.
Calvin had no knowledge of this worldly spirit, nor can any
one fairly impute to him the political tendency of the Protestants
in France : he declared himself against it. All his principles
and designs were opposed to such things ; and this, though the
French church had greater perils to encounter than that of Scot-
land, and had to combat with antagonists of a far more desperate
character. Calvin, in this respect, stood b}' the side of Luther,
who constantly advocated peace, desired to see the church deve-
loping itself through the power of the Spirit, and wished for no
aid from worldly might or worldly policy Both these great
men were anxious to employ a theocratic, spiritual influence
only, and to subject even the church itself, in other respect .
the civil government. At the most, Calvin could only be ac-
cused of giving too great a weight in the presbyterian form of
church-polity to the popular, liberal element over the ministerial,
or of neglecting to combine, when he might, the principle of
episcopacy with that of presbyterianism.
The difference of character in Calvin and Knox was early
displayed when the latter was in England, and interested him-
328 CALVIN AND KNOX. [CUAP. IX.
self in the revision of the Prayer- Book. Then, as subsequently,
he exhibited the most decided hostility to the Anglican church,
on account of its retaining some of the Catholic forms, and not
adopting the severe rule of the Scotch. Calvin, who so energe-
tically strove against superstition, was not in this case disposed
to agree with Knox. He willingly suffered outward forms, in
themselves indifferent, to remain, or at least did not assail them
with fanatical violence, as if they had a real importance. It is
possible, indeed, that he may have strengthened Knox in his
admiration of apostolic simplicity ; but the fundamental idea of
the Scotch reformer, and his dislike to the principles of the
English church, were of an earlier date ; they may be traced back
to the year 1547. He would allow no human interference, but
desired to be guided solely by the plain rule of Scripture. Thus
he refused to accept any appointment which would have im-
posed upon him the necessity of using the liturgy, and sharply
reproved the English clergy, under Elizabeth, for having per-
mitted the revival of many of the ancient forms. It is certain,
however, that the first English reformers would gladly have
adopted the same system of Protestant discipline, and church
forms which Calvin had introduced into France ; but they were
resisted by too powerful a party. Calvin had addressed both
Somerset and Cranmer with great earnestness in favour of
these views. But Elizabeth subsequently confirmed the episco-
pal rule, which, in the form thus given it, petrified the church
and deprived it of life ; for it now ceased to enjoy any element
of activity ; it lost its synods ; while, on the other side, the
presbyterian church was destitute of the element of rest and
durability.
Both Knox and Calvin became acquainted with each other
when their characters were already formed. Mary ascended the
throne of England in 1554; and Knox, with several other di-
stinguished divines, immediately fled to the continent, and pro-
ceeded to Switzerland. This happened at the most splendid
epoch of Calvin's life : his writings were now known through-
out Europe, and people flocked to Geneva from all countries.
He received the Scotchman in the most friendly manner. Their
souls seemed, as it were, created for each other, through their
communion in faith, hope, and works. Both were of the same
age ; but Knox venerated Calvin as a father, and looked to him
for counsel and guidance. The church of Geneva corresponded
to his ideal of a church. Although he was now fifty years of
A.D. 1555-60.] KNOX AT GENEVA. 329
age, he devoted himself to study, under Calvin, with youthful
ardour.
Indignant in the highest degree at the persecutions carried on
by Queen Mary, Knox soon gave to the world one of his most
violent writings, f A Warning to the English Nation/ in which
he described the wretched Gardiner and Bonner as the hangmen
of Mary.
Several other English exiles arrived on the continent at this
time, and formed churches at Strasburg, Basel, Zurich, Geneva,
and other places. At Frankfort they were permitted to establish
a congregation, under the condition that they should adopt the
outward forms of the French reformed church, and renounce the
English liturgy. The refugees chose Knox for their minister,
and Calvin induced him to accept the call. But the churches
of the exiles at Zurich and Strasburg now united to oppose that
at Frankfort, and refused to communicate with it unless it agreed
to retain the old English rites. Knox undertook the part of a
mediator, and besought Calvin to settle the dispute : the latter
stated his opinion, January 20, 1555. In the following year he
went to Frankfort himself; but Knox, as an enemy to the En-
glish liturgy, was driven from his office : he returned to Geneva,
and thence* to Scotland. The church of that country was esta-
blished in 1555. In the following year Knox formed the first
combination against the Catholics, and this was the commence-
ment of those political acts in which the reformer indulged: the
example of which led to such important consequences ; the jus-
tice of which has been so often doubted, and which, accordingly,
form the most remarkable point in his history.
While the Scottish church was thus becoming established, the
English exiles at Geneva elected Knox for their minister. He
willingly accepted the call, and again returning to Calvin's city,
he now took with him his wife and mother-in-law, from whom
he had been so long separated (1556). This was the wile whom
he early lost, and whom Calvin, in one of his letters, describes
as "a most sweet woman/' suavissima. Knox was sentenced
by the catholics, in his absence, to the flames, and was burnt in
effigy: he remained at Geneva two or three years, and this was
the most tranquil period of his stormj life.
In 1557 Knox was recalled to hi i na ive country. Calvin ad-
vised him to obey the summons. He set out ; hut the Scotch
were still unsettled, and he stopped at Frankfort. It was now
that the persecution raged in France. An impious slander had
330 KNOX RETURNS TO SCOTLAND. [CHAP. IX.
been published against the reformed in Paris : they printed an
iVpology, and Knox translated it into English. But his country-
men had not the courage to receive him, and losing the satisfac-
tion which he had looked for from the journey, he once more re-
turned to Geneva. He now endeavoured to make his political
ideas known by means of a work, in which he handled the diffi-
cult question, as to what circumstances may justify resistance to
the chief magistrate. He arrived at the following conclusion :
that sedition is altogether unlawful, but that an entire nation
may rightly resist a tyrannical government. " The nobility
formed," he said, " the defence of national freedom : the nobles
must not let their brethren be murdered. They ought never,
however, to rise from ambitious or mere political motives, but
only for the cause of pure religion/'
Nothing can show more clearly than this, that Knox was de-
pendent upon himself for the development of his principles ; and
that Calvin, as his teacher, did not exercise an uncontrolled in-
fluence on his mind. Calvin never entertained the opinions
above-stated : he exhorted the persecuted in France to contend
only by prayer. Such indeed was the tenderness of his Christian
conscience, that he advised those in prison not to attempt to
escape, but to receive martyrdom as a grace from the hand of God.
Knox joined, at this time, with some friends in planning anew
English translation of the Bible : this translation was known at a
later period as the Geneva Bible, from the place where it was
printed. But his political zeal drove him, at this time, to print
his famous, but rudely written work, against the government of
women, and in which he lays it down as a principle, that it is
not lawful for a woman to ascend the throne. It was peculiarly
a revolutionary writing, however much he protested against its
being regarded in that light. His secret design was to prove
the abuses of the government of the regent, and of that of Mary
Stuart, which succeeded it. This violent production very uselessly
excited the indignation of Mary, and made Elizabeth, the de-
fender of the Protestant church, his enemy : she never forgave
his rashness, and it was the cause of her equally disliking
Calvin.
The nobles of Scotland now united in reality for the defence
of the Protestant religion : they wrote to Calvin, begging him
to use his influence with Knox, and to send him to their aid.
Elizabeth was on the throne, and the members of the English
congregation at Geneva returned to London in 1559. Knox
A.D. 1555-60.] KNOX IN EDINBURGH. 331
however was so hated at the English court, on account of his
political writings, that he dare not pass through England :
this again roused his enmity to that country, and the old quar-
rel respecting the liturgy was renewed. But Elizabeth adopted
a sound policy, and saved thereby both the church and the
throne : she supported Scotland against France, which was
striving to establish Mary Stuart on the throne of that country,
with the design of subsequently placing her on that of England.
Knox, in the mean time, was become a preacher in Edinburgh,
and the head and soul of the evangelical party. Calvin however
united with Cecil, Elizabeth's chancellor, in admonishing him
of his duty, and subsequently endeavoured, as we shall see, to
excuse himself to the queen.
At length war broke out : the French supported the queen
of Scotland, and England the Protestants. A letter written at
this time by Knox to Calvin, on the subject of discipline, is cha-
racteristically short. Calvin's answer is far more circumstan-
tial, and his views are much milder and more moderate than
those of Knox* : the latter was now become a political cha-
racter. Elizabeth besieged Edinburgh and expelled the French.
The queen-regent died. Francis II., the husband of Mary, as-
cended the French throne, on the death of Henry II., and thus
the power of France fell into the hand of the Guises. The par-
liament in Scotland took advantage of this period to establish
the Protestant religion by law (August 24, 1560). A confes-
sion of faith was drawn up : it was altogether Calvinistic, and
proves that Knox was fully agreed with Calvin in belief. To
God alone belongs all honour. Man has lost all by sin : he
is delivered through Christ. He can of himself do nothing ;
but yet has involved himself in condemnation through his own
choice. A book of discipline was also set forth by Knox : he
shows his admiration of the rules followed at Geneva, and wrought
out the system at full. Calvin had the delight to be made ac-
quainted with this glorious progress of his plan, with this triumph
of his doctrine and his discipline. The agreement thus existing
between the systems established at Geneva and in Scotland,
proves what MfCric is unwilling to acknowledge, that Calvin
exercised great influence in Scotland by means of Knox; but the
latter indulged in excesses, and this first led the way to the cor-
ruption of the system. A letter which Calvin addressed to him,
about this time, shows the desire of the writer to keep him within
* Ed. Laus. p. 283. Ed. A.mst. p. 201.
332 KNOX OPPOSES THE QUEEN. [CHAP. IX.
the bounds of moderation*. Scotland was not fortunate in other
respects. The possessions and revenues of the Catholic clergy
were seized by the nobles, and not left for the support of the
church, as in Switzerland (in Zurich, for example), and partly
in several of the German states : hence the great poverty of the
Scotch church and university.
It was at this time that Knox's wife died ; at the period, that
is, when she might have shared with him more prosperous cir-
cumstances. He received a letter from Calvin, containing only
a few words on the subject ; but so highly valued was the writer,
that, according to M'Crie, Knox was filled with joy by these
fewf.
Queen Mary and Francis II. made another attempt to nullify
the decree of the Scottish parliament; but Francis died, and
Mary proceeded to Scotland to assume the government. Knox
now stood opposed to the young queen ; his situation was in the
highest degree difficult ; but impartial judges, who can rightly
estimate his character as a great reformer, his iron strength, and
his devotion to the truth, without however blinding themselves to
his defects, or considering his fierceness and excesses deserving
of praise, will acknowledge that, on the whole, he solved fairly
the perplexing questions which he had to answer. He did not
always support the dignity of a preacher of the gospel ; and it
is probable that Calvin would, in some things, have acted with
greater moderation. Take, for example, Knox's public prayer for
the queen, " Enlighten her heart, O Lord, if it be thy good will !"
— as if the preacher was in doubt upon the subject. If he had
the doctrine of election in view, he passed, by these words, the
bitterest censure on his own belief; and gave occasion to the peo-
ple to suppose that he, perhaps, did not even wish for the conver-
* Calvin had said in a letter which he wrote against ceremonies, " I know
of nothing more important than your being cautious to employ as few cere-
monies as possible. Consider carefully what is required of you." But always
seeking the right medium, he says to Knox, " I hope that, in regard to cere-
monies, you will moderate your zeal. We must take care to preserve the
church free from all superstitious adornment, and must not suffer divine my-
steries to be marred by childish additions ; but holding this fast, do not forget
that you must be ready to bear with some things which may not altogether
please you."
f "Your loss," he says, "is a deep and bitter affliction to me. You had
a wife, to whom few can lie compared ; but you know well where to find con-
solation, and I doubt not that you will bear this great sorrow with patience.
Greet the pious brethren in my name." In a letter to Goodman, Ep. 306, he
says, " I grieve not a little that our brother Knox has been deprived of his most
sweet wife; but I rejoice that, afflicted as he has been, he has continued to
labour strenuously for Christ and the church."
A.D. 1555-60.] VIOLENCE OF KNOX. 333
sion of the queen. In every case a malicious will was evident,
although, on his death-bed, he declared that he had nothing of
the kind in his heart. Calvin indeed discouraged praying for
the papacy and the pope as such ; but he cautiously added, " We
must distinguish between the papal chair and the person*."
Knox was now settled as the head of the Protestant party :
he acted in his character of citizen, as the champion of popular
rights, and not as a minister only, as Calvin did, and as Beza,
in the camp of Conde. A conversation which took place be-
tween Knox and secretary Maitland throws new light on the
principles of this " son of thunder." Thus he defended his
form of prayer, on the plea that Mary Stuart did not hear the
gospel, but the mass, and that he therefore could not help doubt-
ing as to her conversion. Further, the minister desired to hear
his views respecting the relation of rulers and subjects. Knox
had made a distinction, in one of his sermons, between the per-
sons to whom God has entrusted power and the ordinance of
God ; and had said, that people may resist the former without
violating the latter, for that subjects are not bound to obey the
unrighteous commands of their rulers. He now argued, that
he made the above distinction according to the words of the
apostle, who states, that God has established rulers for the up-
holding of peace, for the punishment of the wicked, and the
protection of the good. If rulers therefore pervert this principle,
and employ their power unjustly, this is not to be suffered : the
madness of the tyrant must be resisted. He also added, that he
could not allow Mary Stuart to hear the mass : thus he was
intolerant against the catholics. He insisted not only that the
mass should be abolished, but that the idolaters should be put
to death by the people; for such was the law given by God to
the Israelites. Maitland, on the other hand, remarked, that the
people must not forestal the judgements of God: God would
punish offenders by death, by wars, and other means. Knox
was of opinion that the people might judge their princes.
These principles show that Knox formed the first link in the
chain of those events which subsequently took place in England :
he carried out the republican theory to its farthest extent, and
united it in the closest manner with his views of the Gospel.
* MS. Bern, Sept. 27, 1552. " I know that we must distinguish b< tween
the person, and the abominable and cursed see. But it seems to me that they
who pray by name lor him who hears such a mark of reprobation, must have
a great deal of leisure."
334 FRENCH CHURCH IX LONDON. [CHAP. IX.
We cannot avoid therefore ascribing the overthrow of the En-
glish throne, in an after-age, effected as it was by the Presbyte-
rian and Puritan party, in the name of God, to the influence of
the spirit, which wrought so mightily through Knox, whose
hatred to the English was no less conspicuous and powerful.
The wretched principles which actually led to the events of which
we are speaking, were but those of Knox carried to an extrava-
gant excess, as the latter were themselves an exaggeration of
Calvin's. It would be irrational however to make Calvin an-
swerable for this; and no less unjust would it be, on the other
hand, so to misrepresent Knox's lofty and, in many respects,
even amiable character, as to place him in the light of a gloomy
fanatic. He was a noble instrument in the hand of God; a
benefactor of mankind, and a faithful champion of the truth.
The Scotch, as soon as they learnt that the Reformation was
penetrating their country, prepared themselves for the necessary
course of action. The French church in London began to as-
semble, and a pastor was sought from Geneva. Calvin sent it,
towards the end of the year 1559, the well-known Galiars.
Grindal, bishop of London, had done much to form this church.
Calvin wrote to him, saying, « that he had with difficulty parted
from Galiars; but that he had done so for the sake of God's
kingdom. He was very much esteemed as a worthy servant of
Christ." The next year the bishop sent his thanks, with a noble
eulogy on Galiars*.
Calvin finished in 1559 his Commentary on Isaiah, and had
dedicated it to the queen : we learn, however, that he was in no
small perplexity on this account. The queen received the dedi-
cation angrily: Calvin had expressed himself as opposed to the
government of women : he now endeavoured, as well as he could,
to justify himself. In a letter to Cecil, he says, " that although
a woman's being placed on the throne of a kingdom might gene-
rally be considered as a divine punishment, there were noble
exceptions thereto t" Thus also, in writing to JBullinger, he says,
that " Knox had asked him what he thought of the government
of women. He freely answered, that there were some women
possessed of extraordinary gifts, and who, through the peculiar
blessing with which they were seen to be endowed, manifestly
evinced that God had called them. Deborah was an instance of
* MS. Goth. ed. Bretschn. p. 220, Feb. 10, 1560.
t MS. Bern, Nov. 1559.
A.D. 1555-60.] ENGLISH CHURCHES ABROAD. 335
this truth ; and Isaiah had not said untruly, that queens should
be the protectors and nurses of the church*."
English churches had been formed at Zurich, Basel, Geneva,
Aarau, Emden, Wesel, Duisburg, Frankfort, and Strasburg.
They were by turns broken up and renewed, or others supplied
their place, as was especially the case-on the arrival of the refugees
from France, at the repeal of the edict of Nantes. The churches
of Emden and Frankfort then became established, and have con-
tinued flourishing to the present times. It has been already
mentioned that Calvin dedicated his catechism to the reformed
churches of East-Friesland : he wished to form a union with
those communities. We must here give a brief account of the
relation in which the reformer stood to the church at Frankfort.
It exhibits him again in the character of a mediator ; and affords
a striking contrast to those other circumstances of his eventful
life, which seemed to pass like meteors across his path.
When the refugees, who had been driven from Denmark, and
the north of Germany, established a church at Frankfort, and
were compelled to abandon the English liturgy, there was here
a cause of strife, which was soon followed by another arising from
the controversy on the sacrament. At the convention in 1555 it
was formally resolved, that the Catholics and the communities
holding the Augsburg Confession should alone enjoy the protec-
tion thus afforded ; no other parties or sects were to be suffered on
German ground. This last regulation was employed to excite the
magistrates at Wesel and Frankfort against the English refugees.
In the former of these places, the clergy assailed them as heretics ;
while the refugees on their part appealed to the judgement of Me-
lancthon. A messenger was sent to Wittenberg, and a letter was
written to Melancthon by Francis Perucell, the minister of the
congregation. But respect for Melancthon availed them nothing.
The council informed them that they must either shortly leave
the city, or acknowledge that the true body of Christ is contain-
ed in the sacrament, and that He is eaten not only spiritually,
but bodily with the mouth. The unhappy exiles prayed for time
to consider; they were answered that they ought to thank the
council for its moderation, for that it had the right to strip them
of whatever they possessed, and even to punish them personally.
Perucell acquainted Calvin with all these proceedings. But the
Lutheran clergy continued furious against them ; they even ex-
* Calvin to Bullinger, 3 Cal. Mai. 1554. Mosheim, Neue Nachr. Ketsergcsch.
p. 103.
336 ENGLISH CHURCHES ABROAD. [dlAP. IX.
pressed their rage in the pulpit. One Hermann described the
exiles as wretches who disgraced the sacraments, and who had
stolen like wolves into the sheep-fold, that they might diffuse
the poison which they had themselves imbibed in England. The
common people were greatly excited by these representations.
Somewhat more moderation was exercised by the council at
Frankfort ; but instead of cordially uniting together and exer-
cising mutual forbearance, the English on the one side, and the
French on the other, began to dispute on little differences in
matters of ceremony, and on the various doctrines of the Lord's
Supper. The quarrel thus excited between them was carried to
such an extent, that they had almost proceeded to blows in the
church. Calvin, who was informed of what was taking place,
wrote to the council on the subject.
It has been stated that the refugees elected Knox their mini-
ster. The simple French liturgy gained the victory. When
however the members of the English congregations at Zurich,
and Strasburg, declared themselves against that at Frankfort, be-
cause it had not retained the Anglican ritual, Knox entreated
Calvin to settle the dispute. Calvin had dedicated, in the August
of 1555, his i Harmony of the Gospels ' to the Frankfort council ;
that body accepted the honour with thanks, and made the
author a present of fifty gold pieces. In March 1556 Calvin
wrote to them anew ; he expressed his astonishment that they
had suffered the work of Westphal to be printed at Frankfort, a
work written especially against him, whereas he supposed his
opinions to agree with those which they themselves professed.
If, however, he added, there were any at Frankfort who differed
from him, he should be glad to confer with them. This dissen-
sion was more particularly distressing to him on account of the
refugees, who had left their native land for the sake of the Lord.
If they had faults, still the council should treat them with mo-
deration. The representatives of the Frankfort people quietly
replied, that they owned they did not agree with him in opinion ;
that they were, notwithstanding, anxious for peace, and that they
believed him to be a true servant of God.
But it was not long after this that they exhibited a very hos-
tile attitude in regard both to Calvin and the refugees ; accusing
the former of church -tyranny. Calvin immediately wrote to the
burgomaster Clauburg : he protested against the accusation of
tyranny, and appealed to the testimony of his brethren, who often
rather charged him with weakness. It is interesting to observe
A.D. 1555-60.] CALVIN AT FRANKFORT. 337
Calvin's conduct in this whole affair. He spoke admirably to
the unquiet spirits with whom he had to do, in favour of mode-
ration. They wished to subject their minister, with whom they
were discontented, to a fresh election, and even to further hu-
miliations. Calvin expressed strongly his disapprobation of their
proceedings. " Even Guelphs and Ghibellincs," he said, "unite
when they are subject to a common attack. You are attacked
by those who are enemies to your sacrament. Valerand has re-
pulsed them ; and it is monstrous that he should now be exposed
to violence from you." He afterwards adjured them to seek
peace, and to submit themselves to the majority of the church-
elders. Subsequently he appealed to them again. " If we were
resolved to bear with nothing from others, everyone must
have a world for himself alone. I love you all, and am as anxious
to see your imperfections cured as I am my own." His indiffer-
ence respecting useless ceremonies, in the sacrament especially,
is well-deserving of remark. " There are some silly things to
be tolerated in the English liturgy."
When Calvin found that he could accomplish nothing by let-
ters, he resolved to visit Frankfort himself. He had but just re-
turned from Bern, when he was attacked while preaching with
such a severe fit of ague, that even his strong spirit could not
overcome it ; but after enduring the sickness for some time, he
appeared again stronger than ever on the arena. Farel had of-
fered to accompany him on his journey, but he would not allow
him. He had heard that the plague had broken out at Frank-
fort; and he left without taking leave of Farel, intending thereby
to spare his affectionate zeal.
The council of Geneva gave Calvin for his protector its prin-
cipal herald, Eustachius Vinzens, who had formerly been sent to
accompany him from Strasburg. Laski had already used his
best efforts to inspire a friendly feeling at Frankfort. During
his residence in that city, he was constantly occupied in endea-
vouring to unite the two Protestant churches. King Sigismund
Augustus had encoura^f d him to undertake this work, the
schism being as prejudicial to Poland as it was to Germany.
Laski presented a memorial to the council at Frankfort, in
which he showed, that no sufficient cause existed for the separa-
tion of the two Protestant churches. It was hoped that a con-
ference appointed to take place on the 22nd of May, 1556, might
lead to beneficial results ; but Brent ins ruined every prospect of
reconciliation. He insisted that the reformed should sign the
VOL. II. Z
338 CALVIN AT FRANKFORT. [CHAP. IX.
Augsburg Confession ; and the doctrine of ubiquity, so absurd
in the eyes of Laski, -was exalted by him above every other.
Hence the schism was made wider.
We now see Calvin again sojourning in the city, where he some
years before had met Melancthon. In a letter dated September
17, 1556, he complains of the vast amount of business which he
had to do, and of the fury of the parties engaged in the contro-
versy. " Certain it is that Satan has so befooled them, that
there is no hope of restoring union*. "
Some account of his residence at Frankfort is found in a let-
ter to Melancthon f. " I have been led to this place through the
quarrels which for the last two years have distracted the little
churches here, speaking our language. The greatest danger may
be apprehended, if very prudent measures be not adopted to
avert it. Since my arrival in the city I have not had time to
breathe ; you must therefore pardon the shortness of this letter.
I have however little need to be very anxious about your par-
don on this account, for I see by your silence that you do not
much wish for my letters ; still, I am convinced not merely of
your good feeling, but of your love towards me."
Calvin next states, that a certain Justus Welsius had employed
him two days J, and that he had openly disputed with him on
the subject of free-will. Valerandus Pollanus was at strife with
the burgomaster Clauburg. The subject of their dispute was
the Consensus on the sacrament, which Bucer had set forth, and
which the ministers of Frankfort, in accordance with Calvin^s
views, might subscribe. Among other proofs of his laboriousness,
an old document exists at Gotha, a protocol, that is, written, in his
own hand, and which he drew up as moderator of the presby-
tery in the controversy of the church with Pollanus §. He also
preached at Frankfort, in the church of the White Nuns, which
had been given to the refugees ; and even administered baptism
there, which was afterwards imputed to him as a great offence ||.
It appears that he did not visit the Lutheran ministers during
his stay at Frankfort ; but on the 23rd of September, the day be-
* MS. Bern. "Sane ita eos fascinavit Satan, ut nullam spem concordise
reliquam faciat."
t Calvin to Melancthon, Sept. 17, 1556. In another letter addressed to
Justus Jonas, he says, that he had scarcely an hour free.
t Salig, Geschich. der Augsburg. Confes. Bd. ii. s. 1140, gives an account
of this man.
§ I have read the Consensus by Bucer, and with the exception of one or
two heads, I should not hesitate, for the sake of peace, to accept it.
|| MS. Goth. ed. Bretschneider, p. 73.
A.D. 1555-60.] STATE OF THE CHURCH AT FRANKFORT. 539
fore his departure, he addressed the ministers assembled to com-
memorate the separation from Rome, and blessed them.
By the end of November Calvin was again at home. It is
evident from certain expressions which we find him employing,
that he had not fully accomplished the object of his journey.
On the 21st of December, 1556, he complained to Clauburg, that
the Frankfort senators had proved themselves wanting in resolu-
tion, and he wished him to take measures that the authors of the
tumult might be bridled. In a letter to Holbrach, he calls the
minister, Valerand, who was the chief fomenter, probably, of the
quarrel, a devil*. He, in fact, at length accomplished the purpose
to which his restlessness or ambition impelled him. The English
and French were obliged, through his instrumentality, to subscribe
the Augsburg Confession ; the little word substantially being the
only term omitted. Calvin however still remained in union
with the church at Frankfort ; it reposed confidence in him, and
was glad to receive his advice. In a letter dated February 25,
1559, he expressed opinions of great importance f. Certain it
is, that the magistrates treated the fugitives with no little harsh-
ness. They were required not only to subscribe, as forming the
basis of a reunion, the Augsburg Confession, the Apology, and
the Concordian formularies, which Bucer had drawn up at
Frankfort, but to repudiate all the writings which were opposed
to those documents, and to adopt the forms employed by their
antagonists in the administration of the Lord's Supper. They
consented to the first two articles ; but after mutual recrimination
it was resolved, on the part of those in power, that the church
of the refugees should be closed till they consented to adopt
altogether the ceremonies of the Lutherans, and their opinions
on the subject of the Lord's Supper. They were, moreover, to
elect a new preacher. The universities, and the princes on all
sides, besought the Frankfort magistrates to treat the exiles with
greater forbearance ; they were, it was said, of the same faith with
themselves. But in the year 1562 the intolerance of the Lu-
theran ministers proceeded to such an extent, that the refugees
found themselves compelled to seek another asylum. Elizabeth
invited them to England ; some went to East Friesland. Those
who travelled through Brabant were taken prisoners, thrown
* Dec. 22, 1556.
f MS. Tigur. Feb. 23, 1559- He again spoke of the anxiety and distress
which he suffered. The ministers were quarrelling with each other. He ex-
horted them not to read either the German Theology (La Theologie Germa-
nique), or a little work, entitled ' Der Neue Mensch.'
340 CALVIN AND THE NORTHERN CHURCHES. [CHAP. X.
into dungeons, or committed to the flames. Many retired to
Strasburg and Switzerland.
The history of the church, of which we have thus spoken, is
worthy of attention. It gradually formed for itself a liturgy,
which agreed neither with the Lutheran nor with the Reformed,
especially in respect to ceremonies : it was a compound of these
and of the English. The churches themselves were lost in dis-
traction *.
CHAPTER X.
HIS IN-
FLUENCE IN POLAND. CORRESPONDENCE WITH KING SI-
GISMUND AND WITH THE POLISH NOBLES.
Calvin had already begun, in 1552, to place himself in com-
munication with the Northern States, and had dedicated the
French edition of his Commentary on the Acts of the Apostles
to kins: Christian, who had introduced the Reformation into Den-
mark. He would fain have continued in friendly correspondence
with the monarch, but the Lutheran clergy by their influence
with the king prevented it. After the sacramental controversy
with Westphal, Calvin altered the dedication to Christian, and
dedicated the Commentary, in Latin, to prince Radzivill, the
great promoter of the Reformation in Poland. He also about
this time entered into correspondence with Gustavus Yasa, the
enlightened king of Sweden. To this prince he dedicated his
Commentary on the twelve minor prophets. He was induced
to do this by the persuasion of one of his countrymen, who
hoped thereby that some influence might be exercised on the
mind of the king's son. We must here also mention his work
against Menno Simon, well-known as the head of the anabaptists.
It is comprehended in Calvin's collected correspondence. This
Frieslander, wrho was originally a Catholic priest, published his
doctrine at Emden. Laski had a conference with him, but it
led to no result. Calvin subsequently attacked him, that is in
1559. Menno retired with several others to Poland, where tole-
* Salig, Bd. ii. s. 1135. The liturgy is given in Melchior Fronberger's ac-
count of the French and Netherland Churches, 1598.
A.D. 1555-60.] REFORMATION IN POLAND. 341
ranee and anarchy ruled together. Although Calvin could not
introduce his doctrine into Denmark or Sweden, his animating,
evangelical influence was thankfully recognized in Poland, in-
dependent of the war which he waged with the errors which
there prevailed. Former church-historians have made little
mention of his name in connection with Poland, and he is only
incidentally alluded to by those of a later date. Evidences
however still exist of his zeal and usefulness. The congregation
at Posen, consisting partly of the descendants of the Bohemian
brethren, may be referred to in proof of this. Greatly extended
through the active devotion of George Israel, its chief elder, this
community exhibited for a considerable time the very type and
model of church order. The two monarchs, Sigismund and his
son, were decidedly in favour of pure doctrine ; they therefore
treated the faithful with much kindness. Calvin seized the favour-
able opportunity, and placed himself in communication with all
the great men of the kingdom.
The movement began between the years 1530 and 1540*. An
early hostility was manifested to the doctrine of the Trinity-
Cruciger preached the pure gospel in Poland in 1546 ; the doc-
trines of Calvin and Zwingli were always more favourably re-
ceived there than those of Luther. The Taborites, who bore the
name of Bohemian brethren, and had been driven in a body from
their country, also exercised considerable influence in Poland.
The Reformers became still more powerful under Sigismund Au-
gustus. Nicolaus Olesnicki, urged on by Stancar, was the first to
attack the Roman church. The monks of a convent in Pinczow
were driven forth, the images were destroyed, and an experiment
was made to introduce a public Protestant service after the exam-
ple of that established at Geneva. We have no means of telling
what influence the Genevese themselves had in this matter, but
it is certain that Calvin corresponded at an early period with Tar-
nowski, stadtholder of Cracow, and with prince Radzivill, the
grand marshal of Lithuania. Tar now ski was a remarkable cha-
racter; although moderate, he was decidedly in favour of great
changes; and he endeavoured to gain the pope's consent to the
administration of the sacrament in both kinds, the performance
of the service in the language of the country, the marriage of the
clergy, and the abolition of fasts.
At the diet which assembled in the year 1550, the first of the
* Krasinsky, Gesch. d. Urspr. 6<c. d. Ref. in I'm
en, s. oa
342 REFORMATION IN POLAND. [CHAP. X.
nobility, with Radzivill at their head, appeared as the advocates
of the reformed faith, and as the accusers of the Romish clergy.
The weakness of the papal party was manifest, but the truth did
not prevail. At the diet of 1552*, evident indications existed of
the decline of the Romish church. Orzechowski, a bold, rash
man, who had been foremost in exciting agitation, vacillated to
and fro, and at length became reconciled to the papal party. At
this diet representatives were despatched to Trent, but with the
declared hope that Rome might still accomplish her own thorough
reform.
Calvin presented himself at this juncture. The Poles respected
his doctrine and discipline ; the free republican form of the sy-
nods agreeing far better with their national character than the
consistorial form of the Lutherans. Thus he already enjoyed
their confidence. But it was his design to bring his faith to the
breach ; and it is worthy of notice that he began his efforts, sum-
moned, as he says, thereto, with the king himself. With sound
policy, he admits the principle that great kingdoms may have
patriarchates, and be placed under a primate. Thus we see how
his powerful mind could discover its way through all forms, if
free course was but secured for the gospel. Attentive to the
strictest courtesy, he begins by showing that even kings must
receive instruction from a servant of Christ ; then follows an able
eulogium on the liberal spirit of the monarch, with the remark,
that rulers should be enlightened above all other men. " Re-
member/5 he says, "that in your person God has kindled a light
for all Poland, and which cannot without great sin longer remain
hidden. Let then that heroic energy at length break forth,
which has already been too long slumbering." He next exhorts
him not to allow himself to be held back by papistical principles :
" The papists constantly object to us their hierarchy. They say,
that although the position of the church is corrupt, it is not law-
ful, at least not for the laity, to point the finger at its errors, and
that the papacy has inherited all power through Peter. But it
is very strange, that Paul, when he admonishes us to cultivate
unity, and speaks of one God, one faith, one baptism, and of one
Spirit, one Lord, one body, should have forgotten what here
would have been of such vast importance, namely, that there
must be one great priest, by whose dignity and authority the
whole church is to be held together in the bonds of unity. It
* Krasinskv, B. I 20.
A.D. 1555-60.] REFORMATION IN POLAND. 343
would have been a sad thing, had this been true, not to warn
believers that it is GocFs intention that they should exist under
such a head. Paul says, moreover, that the apostleship of the
gentiles was given to him, as that of the Jews was to Peter.
There is here indicated not only an equality between these two
apostles, but such a division of their offices, that Peter would
seem to have nothing* whatever to do with us. In Ephesians iv.
11, it is not said that a vicar of Christ is appointed to represent
him in his absence, but that there are apostles, preachers, doc-
tors, who are to labour according to the measure of their ability.
Certain it is, that if God had intended to set one above all the
rest, he would have imparted to him, not a mere portion of the
gifts of grace, but the whole fulness thereof/'
He jests at the pretensions of the popes, in respect to their
exclusive possession of the keys : — " What relation has the pope
to Peter ? Would not the seat of the primate have been at Jeru-
salem, if anywhere? There, where Christ beyond dispute exer-
cised the great priestly office. In the Epistle to the Hebrews,
the apostle does not establish a worldly priesthood, but he shows
that Christ is the true high-priest, one who can have no suc-
cessor, because he is after the order of Melchisedec. It is not
for a mere man to govern the whole world. The avarice and
pride of the Roman court fabricated this primacy. The ancient
church founded patriarchates, and set primates over different
provinces ; and in the same manner it was lawful to appoint an
archbishop for the renowned kingdom of Poland ; not however
that he might exercise lordship over the rest of the clergy, or
repossess himself of the power which they had won for them-
selves, but that he might, for the sake of order, hold the first
place in the synods, and preserve a holy union among his col-
leagues and the brethren. So also there might be bishops for
the various provinces or cities, whose office it should be to keep
order in all things, as circumstances required ; and one might
be chosen from every assembly of bishops, to whom the principal
charge might be entrusted; for to endow a man with a fair por-
tion of dignity, according to his state and occupation, is very
different to subjecting the whole world to a single power. The
Catholic theory is at strife with God's original appointment, and
with the original plan of the church. For a bishop to be a bishop
of bishops, he must himself be a bishop. Unworthy however
is he of such a title who refuses to learn, but surrenders himself
to idle pomp, and impiously destroys the doctrine of Christ.1'
344 CALVIN AND THE POLES. [CHAP. X.
Calvin, in the next place, protests against the immorality and
impiety of the Roman court. His language becomes more and
more vehement : he calls the whole Catholic church a sect. No
reform, he says, could be expected from it ; it could only exist
by the ruin and misery of the church. To wait, therefore, for
improvement, on the supposition that the pope would assent to
it, was only to have recourse to an absurd subterfuge. " We
now know/' he says, " what the apostles meant when they pro-
claimed at the beginning, that the builders had rejected the chief
corner-stone."
The king received this address graciously, and answered it :
Calvin therefore continued his admonitions*. We see him, both
in this and the following year, using every effort to excite the
zeal of all the great and influential men in Poland. In one day
he despatched four letters to that country f. That to the count
of Tarnaw, general of the Polish army, is written in the most
energetic language. Calvin spoke to him as a soldier to a sol-
dier, exhorting him to place himself at the head of the soldiers
of Christ. He seems to have understood his character, and to
have endeavoured to work upon him, through his feelings both
of duty and honour J. Thus he represents to him the baseness
of the papacy ; the glory which God ascribes to the confession
of the truth ; and the rage of the enemies of Christ, which ought
to stimulate more and more the noble zeal of his followers. " It
is an honour to contend for God, and you must not be the last
to do so." He further represented, that it was for the interest
of the state to take this course. " Poland can never be quiet if
the reformed religion be not established in the country." — " You
may thus, therefore, evince also your fidelity to the king." —
" God blesses those people only who accept the true faith."
The danger to the Catholic church increased every day. A
protestant synod at Kosminek effected in 1555 a union between
the Bohemian brethren and the Calvinists in Poland: this
greatly strengthened the Protestant party. " God," says Calvin
to a Polish knight, " always blesses this fellow ship and commu-
nion of the members of Christ. The experience of the Wal-
denses, whom the Lord has so long proved, will be of very
great use."
In the year 1555 the old disputes respecting the church were
renewed at the diet of Piotrkow. It was announced to the king
* Ed. Laus. Ep. 218. Ed. Arast. p. 104. f December 29, 1555.
* Ed. Laus. Ep. 220. Ed. Amst. p. 104.
A.D. 1555-60.] MEMOIR OF LASKI. 345
that an immediate necessity existed to assemble a national synod,
consisting of the representatives of all parties, who might take
means for reforming the church, on the principles of Scripture ;
and that the meeting ought not to be formed of the Polish mini-
sters only, but that the most distinguished reformers in various
parts of Europe, and particularly Calvin, Beza, Melancthon, and
the Italian Vergerio, who was then in Poland, should be invited
to attend.
This proposal created a great sensation, but the Polish bishops
had sufficient influence to nullify it. The Poles themselves
however received Calvin's exhortations with profound attention.
Two years subsequent to this they earnestly desired him to come
to them alone, and to work there. This must have been the
general wish, for he answered them in a letter addressed to all
the nobility who had accepted the pure doctrine*. Excusing
himself, he says, " I learn from a letter that my arrival among
you would be acceptable, but I fear that my leaving this place
might be attended with great injury to the church here." The
council also would not allow his departure. These events oc-
curred simultaneously with Laski's recal to Poland (1556), so
that Calvin added : " Now that Heaven has granted you the pri-
vilege of enjoying the labours of that most excellent servant of
Christ, a Lasco, I do not see why you should desire my presence
so much ; and if it be not really necessary, you cannot yourselves
wish to take me from a station where 1 am usefully engaged."
He promises however to seek the Lord for them in prayer.
The circumstance above stated leads us to review briefly the
life of a Lasco, and Calvin's relation to him. Calvin took ad-
vantage of every opportunity to praise this awakened man, and
to express his esteem for him. There were few men indeed, even
in these favoured times, so remarkable for vivacity, boldness and
simplicity. lie was descended from a noble family; was con-
verted by Zwingli in the course of a journey through Germany,
and lived some time with Erasmus, who entertained for him the
most lively affection. When he found himself compelled to give
up every hope of the reformation of the Catholic church, he went
abroad (1537)j married at Mainz, and was excommunicated by
Koine. In 1554 he became superintendent of the East Frisian
churches, where, after six years, but not till then, he was so happy
as to see the Romish errors completely abolished. Albrecht
• Ms. Bern, 8 Mart. 1557.
346 MEMOIR OF LASKI. [CHAP. X.
of Prussia was now anxious to obtain his assistance in establish-
ing the Reformation in his territories ; but he declined the invi-
tation, asserting the principle that the church should be wholly
independent of the state. Thus also he separated entirely from
the Lutherans, on publishing his Confession of Faith for East
Friesland, which now pertained altogether to the Reformed com-
munion. It was about this time, probably, that his more inti-
mate acquaintance with Calvin began ; and when the Lutherans
acquired the upper hand in Friesland, he gladly accepted Cran-
mer's invitation to England (1548). Disguising himself, he
ventured, according to his daring custom, to travel through Bra-
bant. In the following year he became the head of the foreign
Protestant churches in London, the admirable champion of their
rights, and the overseer of their schools. It appears that he did
not agree with Bucer on the subject of the Lord's Supper. De-
cided in character as he was, he had little in common with a
man so ready to incline to many sides. Calvin mentioned this
to his friend Farel*.
On his return to the continent, he was unwilling, on account
of the Lutherans, to remain at Emden : he accordingly went
to Frankfort. It was his object to reconcile the Lutherans and
the Reformed in that city. We have already alluded to his wri-
ting on this subject : he also engaged in a colloquy for the same
purpose, and went to Speier to regulate the proceedings. Calvin
said to himf, "They will avoid a friendly colloquy as something
odious ; but if they be honest, they will find us ready for what-
ever is reasonable/5 He warned him earnestly to be cautious of
Vergerius, and added, that he would himself hasten to be present,
whenever the princes would actually hold a meeting. To this the
Zurichers would never agree, and Calvin relates what Bullinger
said to him against the colloquy.
Laski now engaged singly with Brentius : he disputed against
the doctrine of ubiquity : it was founded neither on Scripture,
nor on the church. The apology which he addressed to the
council of Frankfort, and from which it appeared that he agreed
with the Augsburg Confession, was written in obedience to the
wish of the king of Poland. Calvin approved of it, but con-
sidered it heavy: he wTrote to Laski August 28, 1556, saying,
* MS. Gen. Febr. 1551. He does not quite agree with Bucer, it seems,
and he will not dissemble. But what wonder if he dissents from Bucer?
f MS. Bern, Mai. 15, 1556.
A.D. 1555-60.] PROGRESS OF THE REFORMATION. 347
that " he was wholly of opinion that there was nothing in the
Augsburg Confession which did not agree with his doctrine *."
Brentius had utterly destroyed the hope of a reunion. Laski
proceeded to Wittenberg to confer with Melancthon : the latter
gave him a letter to the king of Poland, exhorting him to pro-
mote the Reformation in that country. Laski, on his return,
demonstrated, in a writing on the subject, the necessity of abo-
lishing the Roman hierarchy f (December 1556). This was the
time when Calvin exercised so much influence on the Poles, and
the enterprising Laski was wholly devoted to accomplishing the
work of reform. But nothing was left undone to make him an
object of suspicion to the king : it was even reported that he
was a determined enemy to his native land, and that he was en-
gaged in collecting troops to effect a revolution. These reports
made some impression on the monarch, till meeting with one of
Laski's relations, who opened his eyes to the truth, he observed,
" You know that such movements and disturbances frequently
lead to the ruin of states. Say therefore to Laski, Carry on the
work of religion among yourselves, and in a short time you will
see that I look more to the help of God than to that of men J."
But at the next diet the affair was again deferred, and put off
by the machinations of Satan to another occasion. We see Laski,
however, appointed chief superintendent of all the Protestant
churches in Lesser Poland. The union of the Lutherans with
the Reformed, for which preparation had been made by the junc-
tion of the latter with the Bohemian brethren, was the first object
to engage his attention. He did not make a journey to the king,
but he wrote to him. The Italian Lismanini now came to his aid :
this person had already employed his influence to induce the king
to promote the Reformation : he had expounded to him Calvin's
Institutes twice a week, and had travelled into different Protestant
countries for the purpose of affording the monarch a true ac-
count of their state. In the course of this journey he had visited
Bern and Geneva, whence he travelled to Paris, on returning
from which he came again to Geneva. There, in conformity
with Calvin's exhortations, he publicly announced his conversion
to Protestantism, and marked the event by marrying. This latter
step was imprudent; it betrayed the views of the king, who now
* MS. Bern. " Mihi placet argumentum, nam el ita rea habet et imprimis
utile est cognosci, nihil esse in Confessione Augnstana, quod non sit doctrinal
nostra? consentaneum."
t Krasinsky, s. 106.
J Ed. Laus. Ep. 234. Amst. 120, Utenhoviua Calvino, Oncer. 1557-
348 LASKI AND VERGERIO. [CHAP. X.
forbad his return. The clergy pronounced him excommunicate,
and the interest of Bullinger, Calvin and Beza was exerted for
him in vain. It was not till 1555, when the synod at Pinczow
wras held, and when Calvin entreated the most influential of the
Protestants to invite him to be present, that he dare venture to
return. He lived for a long time concealed in the house of a
Polish lady, Agnes Dluska, with whom Calvin also was in cor-
respondence*. By means of Tarnow and Cruciger, he at last
succeeded in placing Lismanini again in a sphere of activity ; but
the Italian, unfortunately, too readily inclined his ear to the de-
spisers of the doctrine of the Trinity. He had entertained Lselius
Socinus at his house in the year 1551, and it is probable that he
then imbibed the doctrines of that teacher, though he concealed
it while at Geneva. A synod at Cracow repeated the ban pro-
nounced upon him. He subsequently went to Konigsberg, where,
in a fit of phrenzy, he deprived himself of life. Although now
standing alone, Laski went boldly forward in the work of reform :
his grand purpose was to effect a reformation after the example
of that of England,, and at the same time to accomplish the union
of the two parties. By the efforts which he made, he laid the
foundation for the settlement subsequently agreed upon at San-
domir.
At the diet held in 1556 the important law was passed, that
it should be lawful for any nobleman to introduce the observance
of the evangelical service into his house. Rome was called upon
to correct the abuses with which it was charged. The pope had
sent a legate, and he was present at the diet. Vergerio and
Laski worked together : they introduced the reformation into
Elbing and Danzig, and all seemed prepared for the separation
of Poland from Rome.
It is remarkable that, worthy of praise as was Vergerio's con-
duct, Calvin constantly warned people against him, and mani-
fested his own want of confidence in his character : he calls him
a double-minded, ambitious, covetous, tricky, vain, unsettled
man. Laski was of a character altogether different to this. In
the year 1557 we again find Calvin praising this excellent man,
in a letter respecting the Poles : — " If, after the war with Liev-
land, the reformation of the church be steadily carried forward,
Laski will assuredly obtain that situation with the king which is
due to piety, learning, experience and ability. The only danger
* MS. Gen. Calvin to Agnes Dluska, the mother of some young men study-
ing at Zurich. 4 Cal. Jan. 1555.
A.D. 1555-60.] VACILLATION OF THE POLES. 349
is, that he may fail, in some degree, through too great an auste-
rity*."
A synod was assembled by the Catholics at Lowicz, in which
the abuses of the church were spoken of with great boldness.
It had indulged of late in new excesses, and the whole people
were enraged against it ; but it was not till 1559 that an attempt
was made to exclude the bishops from the senate : even this
proved fruitless. The decrees however of the Council of Trent
were utterly rejected by the diet. Thus the struggle between
the two parties continued for years without any decisive event.
Laski died in 15 GO, and saw no result of his faithful labours. This
indecision on the part of the Poles greatly distressed Calvin : the
volatile Antitrinitarians were mixed up with these proceedings.
We learn from his letters to Tarnowsky the real state of affairs at
this time : he had suggested to the timid mind of his correspon-
dent the following noble thoughts : " Whatever dangers may
threaten us, the overthrow of the perishable kingdom of this world
can never appear a matter of so much consequence as to induce
us, in order to uphold it, to neglect the service of God and the
pure religion, on which depends our eternal salvation. But these
fears are vain ; for Christ, the prince of peace, would soon allay
whatever storms Satan might excite." Tarnowski answered the
simple minister of the Gospel in a haughty, jesting tone. Calvin's
patient reply to his ironical objections was very admirable, and
shows with what force and ability the reformer could act in such
circumstances.
The Reformation could make no progress among minds so va-
cillating and capricious, and which did not feel the immediate
tyranny of Rome, the people in general knowing nothing of the
baptism of suffering, or of the penitence to which it leads, as in
France, England and Germany. But Calvin performed his part :
there was much that was noble in his correspondence with prince
Radzivill, that ardent champion of the Reformation. The prince
applied to him at an early period of the movement, and desired
to be called his friend ; but scarcely had he become confirmed in
his faith, when the restless minds by which he was surrounded
began to disturb the unity and purity of the doctrine which he
had been led to embrace. Lrclius Socinus was among the first
to create this excitement. Calvin, as we have seen, commended
him with affectionate earnestness to the Poles, and must have
* MS. Gen. 155 7.
350 ANTITRINITARIANS IN POLAND. [CHAP. X.
felt for him originally no slight regard. At a later period* he
expressed strong doubts regarding him, and seems, after some
few years, to have thoroughly understood both him and Ochi-
nus f. Socinus however subsequently awakened new hopes, and
was immediately received in the most friendly manner: he had
deceived, in fact, both Calvin and Bullinger; the former obser-
ving, in writing to the latter, "that he willingly readmitted the
now tranquillized Socinus to his friendship, seeing that he had
renounced his errors J."
But to understand the relation in which Calvin and Socinus
stood to each other, the reader must refer to what has been said
in an earlier part of this work. The injury which these seekers
after something new inflicted on the church was greater even
than the evils wrought by the papists. The works of Servetus
were much read in Poland. Peter Gonesius was the first to
reduce the errors of the Antitrinitarians of that country to a sy-
stem: he publicly declared his opinions in 1556, and the pro-
gress of unbelief was so rapid and overwhelming, that the ruin
of the reformed churches was generally expected. We have
before spoken of Blandrata and Stancar : Calvin earnestly warned
the Poles against them. At the synod of Pinczow, 1556, and
subsequently to that, when Laski and Stanislaus Sarnicki resisted
these false teachers, they failed to attain their end. Gregory
Pauh, who took Blandrata's place when the latter was obli-ed
to leave, and went to Siebenbiirgen, professed, without secrecy,
his opposition to the Trinity. Gentilis, Alciat, and Dudith, ful-
filled their course there. The parties at length separated, and
in the year 1563 the doctrines of the Antitrinitarians were for-
mally condemned in an assembly of the Reformed. The Anti-
trinitarians now united with each other in one body, the foun-
dation of the union being their common belief in the superiority
of the Father to the Son: this took place in 1565, when they
received their constitution.
But Calvin long continued to cherish hope, and he rejoiced
that his system of discipline had, at least, been introduced into
Poland. This was a triumph for the principles of the Reforma-
tion; but the Poles were too fond of unbridled liberty to be able
to comprehend the worth of Calvinistic severity. In the letter
last-cited Calvin admonished them to establish a seminary for
* MS. Gen. Calv. Bullingero, Aug. 7, 1554
t K5" 5ern- Calv* Vilet0 et Bez*> AFil 10, 1556.
J MS. Gen. Calv. Bullingero.
A.D. 1555-60.] TOLERATION IN POLAND. 351
ministers. About the same time he entered into correspondence
with a learned and pious Pole, Doctor Andreas Tricesius, who
had been requested to translate the Scriptures into the language
of the country. He wrote also to Johannes Bonar, castellan of
Viecz, to persuade him to become responsible for the expenses
of this work*. Laski, some time before his death, united with
several persons, some of whom even were inclined to Socinianism,
in prosecuting this translation of the Bible into Polish : it was
printed at Brzewsc, in Lithuania, in the year 1563.
But Calvin was often justly alarmed at the signs which he dis-
covered of a restless character : the whole nation, in fact, seemed
to him in a suspicious state, for few only proved themselves sin-
cere f- In his care for the Poles he acted in a manner consistent
with his general character. Thus to Stanislaus Sarnicki, who be-
sought him, shortly before his death, again to address his people,
he replied that it was useless for him now to write to them on
the subject of the Trinity, for that his ( Admonition ' to the Poles
was already printed, and he appended it to his letter. This Ad-
monition was not indeed the last, but it was one of Calvin's latest
works, and his regard for the Poles was strikingly proved by his
taking the pains to prepare it for the press, while he was daily
sinking under his infirmities.
It is interesting for us to know, that in the midst of these
theological struggles, the healthier portion of the congregations
effected that which was not accomplished in any other church in
Protestant countries ; that is, the evangelical members of the
community preserved unity, and yet retained distinct confessions.
Poland rendered itself remarkable, from the first, by a noble
tolerance. Punishment for heresy was wholly abolished ; and
although the Catholics constantly advised the persecution of
those who fell away, and even Beza himself once wished strong
measures to be taken against the Antitrinitarians, the govern-
ment constantly answered, that the punishment of those who
entertained different opinions was wholly forbidden. Hence the
dissenters among the Protestants flocked to Poland as a place of
refuge. This tolerance and mildness led to the union of the
Swiss-reformed, the Bohemian brethren, or Waldenses, and the
Lutherans J. When the Bohemians here spoken of became
known, by means of various reformers, in Germany and Swit-
* Both letters are in the MS. Paris.
f MS. Gen. Calv. Bullingero, Sept. 12, 1563.
t Krasinskv, s. 132, 142.
352 PLAN OF REFORMATION. [CHAP. X.
zerland, for their orthodoxy, the Lutherans evinced their readi-
ness to own them as brethren, notwithstanding the efforts of
Flacius Ulyricus, who made a journey to Posen to hinder it.
After many disputes and delays, and after the Wittenbergers had
again declared themselves in favour of the measure, the union of
the churches was proclaimed at Sandomir (1570) in a synod,
from which the Antitrinitarians were excluded, on the condition
that none of the three parties should force its particular confes-
sion upon the others, but that all should adopt a general Polish
Confession.
But as no other means availed to uphold the Catholic church,
an antagonist was now raised against the evangelical party far
more formidable to it than even the vacillation and disbelief of
some of its members : we allude to the Jesuits, who possessed
themselves of all the resources of education. Bishop Hosius, on
his return from Trent, prayed Lainez to send him some of his
spiritual soldiers : this was in 1564. After the death of Sigis-
mund Augustus in 1572, they had freer scope. The king, though
irresolute in character, was of a noble and gentle disposition.
There is little doubt that he would willingly have adopted the
Protestant doctrine, and that form of it which was preached by
the Swiss Calvinists. His plan, as recommended to him by
Laski, was to let the reformation spring from the midst of the
Polish church itself, whence a constitution would be secured for
it similar to that of the church of England. But during the
agitation which followed his reign, the Jesuits made great strides ;
a warning for the country, which can only regain legitimate free-
dom through the illuminating power of truth.
In France, to which we must now turn our attention, the
evangelical church was destined to pursue a very different
course, and to prepare for itself a future not allowed to Poland.
A.D. 1558-GO.] REFORMED CHURCH IN FRANCE. 353
CHAPTER XL
INFLUENCE OF CALVIN IN FRANCE. RAPID DEVELOPMENT
OF THE REFORMATION IN THE FIRE OF PERSECUTION.
MARTYRS IN THE REIGN OF HENRY II. AT LYONSjCHAMBERY,
AND OTHER PLACES. CALVIN?S DISTRESS. — HE EXHORTS
THE GERMAN PRINCES TO INTERFERE. BEGINNING OF
THE CHURCH IN PARIS. EMIGRATION OF THE REFORMED
TO AMERICA. HEROIC COURAGE OF THE CONFESSORS.
ANNE DU BOURG. SKETCH OF EVENTS PRECEDING THE
COLLOQUY OF POISSY. BELIEF AND DISCIPLINE OF THE
FRENCH CHURCH. UNITY OF THE CHURCH UNDER CAL-
VIN'S INFLUENCE. HIS SUCCESS AT ITS HIGHEST POINT.
ANIMATING ADDRESS TO ALL THE GREAT PERSONAGES
IN FRANCE BELONGING TO THE EVANGELICAL PARTY.
The history of the Gospel in France is that of the heroism of
its professors on the one side, and of a wrathful antichristianity,
combined with the selfishness of the French princes, on the other.
Far more anxious about their own authority, which seemed en-
dangered by the new faith, than concerned respecting the defence
of the Catholic church, the Romish, Spanish and French courts
exhibit all those vices concentrated in one point which are usually
spread over a wide space. The superstition of the priests, the
intrigues of the Jesuits, the bloodthirsty cruelty of the regent,
the violation of morality and justice, went hand in hand. Re-
freshing is it to contemplate the other side of the picture, where
we see evangelical purity displaying its best influence. A won-
derful phenomenon indeed it was, that Lutheranism, as it was
then called, had spread to a wider extent in France than in any
other country, except Germany, while it was in no other so fear-
fully oppressed.
We have already spoken of the beginning of the Reformation
in France. The city of Mcaux was the central point of the he-
roic conflict : it was there that the bishop, Briconnet, and John
Leclerc, defended their theses against the pope. It was at Meaux
that the last persecution of the reformed took place previous to the
French Reformation*. That great champion of the faith, who first
preached the Gospel in Metz, died there soon after he had pro-
* Coquerel, Hist, des Eglises du Desert, t. ii. towards the end.
VOL. II. 2 A
354 REFORMED CHURCH IN FRANCE. [CHAP.XI.
claimed the truth. Pavans, L'Ermite de Livry, Denis de Rieux,
Berquin, Renier, Caturce, were the first who, through their suf-
ferings in the flames, kindled a holy fire, and proved anew that
the blood of the martyrs is the seed of the true church. Wrought
upon themselves by a mighty power, they wrought powerfully
upon the people, so that a Catholic writer of that period, under
the influence of strong emotion, observes, that " it was astonish-
ing how men and women, nay, even young girls, went joyfully to
die, and remained firm as rocks in their agony. Such examples,
continually repeated, affected equally the hearts of the simple and
the great ; nor could they who were thus affected believe that
the sufferers had not the truth on their side."
We have before described how that, towards the end of the
reign of Francis I., the Waldensian villages were burnt, in the
name of the king, while their unfortunate inhabitants were either
massacred on the spot or sent to the gallies. It has also been
stated that the king felt deeply the stings of conscience before
his death, and how the city of Meaux suffered from persecution.
But Henry II. had now ascended the throne, and was sur-
rounded by four advisers, who were in all respects the most de-
termined enemies of the Gospel : they were, the Cardinal of Lor-
raine, Anne de Montmorency, the Marshal St. Andre, and the
old mistress of the king, Diana of Poictiers, who controlled him,
as Beza says, by a sort of magic. When the king solemnized
his public entry into Paris, he expressed his wish to see one of
the heretics. A poor Huguenot tailor was accordingly brought
to him : the tailor was a man whose cowardice, it was supposed,
might be safely reckoned upon ; but, contrary to expectation, he
proclaimed with energy the great truths of the Gospel; and
when the king, hearing him address Diana of Poictiers somewhat
rudely*, desired him to be burnt, he fixed his eyes so firmly on
the monarch, that the latter could never forget his look. Many
others were burnt in Paris at this festival, and the same spectacle
presented itself on all sides. Beza gives a connected detail of
the occurrences of the period f, extending to the year 1553.
On the 21st of June, 1551, the king issued the edict of Cha-
teau-briant, which renewed all those previously published, and
committed the trial and punishment of heretics, hitherto divided
among several, to one tribunal exclusively, invested with the
* " Madame," he said, "be contented with having infected France, and do
not mix your bad odour with things so sacred as the truth of God."
f Beza, I. c. i. p. 84.
A.D. 1558-60.] PERSECUTION IN FRANCE. 355
power of life and death. The parliament was blamed for having
been remiss in the prosecution of such offenders ; and it was
ordered that the possessions of all those who fled should be con-
fiscated, and that no book printed in Geneva, or in any of the
reformed states, should be admitted into the kingdom. The
monarch, not contented with this, went a step further, and ap-
pointed Matthias Ori, of whom we have spoken in the trial of
Servetus at Vienne, as chief inquisitor.
The year 1553 was rendered remarkable by the death of a great
many holy martyrs, among whom were the five students at Lyons
before alluded to. The Cardinal Tournon, who had gained great
renown as a persecutor of heretics, had promised, on passing in
his journey from Italy through Bern, to interest himself in be-
half of the accused ; but he was mocking the Bernese. As soon
as he learnt that the king was inclined to yield in some degree, he
employed his influence to the utmost to persuade him to stronger
measures. The numerous letters however sent by the Bernese
occasioned a delay in the execution of the five students, and
they found time to carry on the work of evangelical conversion.
Cresphr's Martyrology has preserved several letters written by
Calvin to the sufferers.
But if this period was rich in witnesses to the truth, how much
more so was the year 1555 ! It was during this year that the bishops
Hooper, Ridley, Latimer, and Cranmer, were condemned to the
flames in England, the last-named suddenly evincing the Chris-
tian greatness which lay hid within him. France rivaled En-
gland in this conflict ; and Calvin wrote to encourage the church
there, especially afflicted by the death of five other confessors
burnt at Chambery. The sufferings of the persons here spoken
of were almost more edifying than those of the former martyrs.
Three of them were ministers. Like the five students, they had
all left Geneva singing psalms as they went forth witli the grand
design of spreading the Gospel in France, and winning souls
for the Lord, although they beheld on all sides the smoke of
burning piles, and had so many examples to deter them from
their course. The fulness of joy inspired by the Holy Spirit was
shown conspicuously in these martyrs. Having been speedily
apprehended, they attained their end by leading many others,
through the grandeur of their devotion, to a similar confession*.
One of these martyrs, Anton Laborie. was married. We quote
some words of a letter which he wrote while in prison to his
• Hist, dea Martyrs, p. 345, and Beza, Hi*r. Krrles. p. f)7.
2 a 2
356 PERSECUTION IN FRANCE. [CHAP. XI
wife. They prove how high Calvin stood in the estimation and
confidence of these believers, who must doubtless have known
him better than his modern vilifiers, "Anna, my good sister !
you know that you are still young, and are about to be sepa-
rated from my society. If such be God's good will for us, com-
fort yourself in Him, and with the thought that Jesus Christ is
your Father and your Husband. I am convinced that He will
not forsake you. Pray to Him without ceasing for his holy
word. Flee the society of the wicked; seek that of the pious.
Follow not your own conceits, but the counsel of our right-
minded friends, especially that of Mr. Calvin. He will not let you
come to any harm, if you act according to his wish ; and you
know that he is led by the Holy Ghost. If you many again,
and I advise you to do so, I beg you to hearken to his opinion,
and to do nothing without him."
Calvin's messengers fearlessly penetrated into the deepest dun-
geons. He wrote to the heroic confessors at the beginning of their
imprisonment, and while they were not yet so fully confirmed in
their resolution. Wishing to inspire them with a holy tranquillity
against the approaching conflict, he says, " My brothers ! as
soon as we were informed of your imprisonment, I sent a mes-
senger to you. It is not necessary to tell you what care we feel
for you, and in what distress your bonds hold us. I doubt not
that since so many believers are praying for you, our good God
will grant you your wish, and hear your sighs. I can see indeed
from your letters how he has already begun to work in you. If the
weakness of the flesh show itself somewhat therein, and prove
that you have to endure a hard struggle, I do not wonder there-
at, but praise God for giving you the victory. Fulfil now what
you have learnt ; and since it has pleased the Master to employ
you in his service, go forward therein as you have begun.
Although the door is shut to you, and you can no longer edify
those to whom you were sent by teaching, yet will the witness
which you are about to give strengthen them from afar. God
will add such force to this testimony, that it shall sound much
farther than the human voice can reach. With regard to any
earthly means for effecting your deliverance, I would that we
possessed them, even though they afforded no hope of success.
We will certainly do whatever in us lies, but God instructs
us to take a higher view. Your main object must be so to col-
lect your thoughts, that you may find rest in his fatherly good-
ness, not doubting but that He will guard both your body and
A.D. 1558-60.] PERSECUTION IN FRANCE. 357
spirit ; and that if the blood of the faithful be precious to Him,
He will manifestly show that it is so in your case, seeing that He
has chosen you for his witnesses. If it be his good pleasure to
make use of your lives as a seal to the truth, — (you know that
this is a sacrifice of the highest worth to him) — let it be your con-
solation, that leaving all in his hands you can lose nothing ; for if
he keeps us under his guardianship even in this imperfect state,
how much more will he not be the guardian of our souls when
He has taken us back to Himself 1"
No church had as yet been regularly formed. The martyrs
were preachers. But in this season of confusion, a young man,
De la Riviere, the son of the sieur de Launay, made the first at-
tempt to found a church in Paris. This church continued to
flourish till the reign of Louis XV., when it was destroyed, and
did not revive till after the revolution. The father, a decided
enemy of the Gospel, implored his son not to kill him with grief.
Some friends however led the young man to Paris, where he held
prayer-meetings in the house of De la Ferriere ; the latter re-
solved not to let his infant child be baptized according to the
Romish rites ; and the community now formed elected Riviere
for their minister, and also appointed elders and deacons. All
this took place under the eyes of the parliament, which established
a chambre ardente in the city, where the Sorbonne and the people
gave full scope to their rage. The congregation of which we
have spoken existed till 1557-
Calvin addressed the ministers, elders and deacons, for the first
time, January 5, 1556. His language was strong and encoura-
ging ; he told them that he was anxious for their welfare, and sent
them a minister from Geneva. They had asked for another, but
he would have too much excited, says Calvin, the wrath of the
enemy. Beza, Viret, or Farcl, must have been the person alluded
to. A letter written to Calvin from Paris, in 1557, by Thomas
Querculus, who had been chosen the minister of the congrega-
tion then existing there, shows that it was well-established and
flourishing. " Resting," he says, " upon the strong arm of the
Lord, it becomes exalted more and more every day */* The
writer also expresses his wish for a personal consultation with
Calvin. Meaux, Angers, Poictiers, and many other cities, fol-
lowed the example of the capital, and formed, amid numberless
dangers, their several little communities.
In the year 1557 the persecutors became dissatisfied with the
* xMS. Goth.
358 PERSECUTION IN FRANCE. [CHAP. XI.
proceedings which they had hitherto instituted. The Cardinal
Lorraine induced the king to establish a tribunal for the trial of
heresy. The bull of the pope confirming the design was pub-
lished on the 2Gth of April, but some difficulty still attended the
execution of the plan. The battle of St. Quentin occurred : the
evangelical church at Paris occupied itself in prayer, beseeching
the Lord to turn away his wrath from the land. Great excite-
ment prevailed. On the 4th of September, the faithful, to the
number of four hundred, assembled in the night, that they might
celebrate the Lord's Supper with greater solemnity. A sermon
was preached on 1 Cor. chap. xi. But the priests had discovered
the meeting and given the alarm. About midnight they rushed
in with horrible clamours, and fell upon the congregation as it
was preparing to depart. Some exclaimed that they were mur-
derers, others Lutherans, and the people just awoke from sleep
hastened to the spot armed with halberds. Many of the gentle-
men of the congregation opened a way for themselves with their
swords, but the others remained shut in, and guarded by the
people till the arrival of the magistrates. The latter learnt on
inquiry, that the congregation employed itself in reading the
word of God, in prayer, and in partaking of the sacrament; that
all disturbers of the peace, thieves and adulterers, were rigidly
excluded from the society ; that supplication was made for the
king, as appeared by the liturgy ; and that the service ended with
singing of psalms. It appeared that many of the females, of
whom there were about 140 in the congregation, were women of
the first families. The multitude attacked them furiously as
they were conveyed from the place of meeting.
The common voice was against the persecuted, and the king
suffered himself to be led by the clergy. The misery of France
was ascribed to the Protestants, as the misfortunes of the empire
were to the Christians in the time of the primitive church. It
was vulgarly reported that as soon as they extinguished the lights,
the congregation gave itself up to every species of licentiousness.
All those who had been apprehended were cast into the most
wretched dungeons. Their relatives despatched messengers to
Germany and Switzerland to excite the princes of the Reformed
states to intercede in their behalf. Twenty-one were condemned
to die in the flames, and three were speedily led to execution.
Beza describes the death of the youthful Gravelle, of the aged
Clinet, and of the beautiful Philippa de Luns, in her 23rd year,
widow of the sieur de Graveron, lately deceased. The 2/th
A.D. 1558-60.] MARTYRS IN FRANCE. 359
of September was the day of their death, and of their triumph ;
the day on which the Holy Ghost was to exhibit its power in the
youth, the aged man, and the weak woman. Many similar spec-
tacles were presented to the people in this Babel.
But in the meantime Geneva had turned its attention to these
proceedings ; and it is interesting to see how Calvin, while ex-
horting the sufferers boldly to encounter martyrdom, employed
with fatherly anxiety all the earthly means in his power for their
deliverance. The popular excitement was now somewhat abated,
for no insurrection broke out, as the enemy had pretended would
be the case; the slanders also which had been circulated were
confuted. A mother, whose daughters it was said had been dis-
honoured, proved the falsehood of the charge before a judicial
tribunal. Still greater benefit was conferred on the persecuted
by the publication of a little book, spoken of in the Livre des
Martyrs, and in which the testimony of the fathers is adduced
in behalf of their doctrine. It was written by a minister of the
church in Paris, named Chandieu. A Sorbonnist and inquisitor,
De Mouchi, answered it with senseless fury.
While Calvin despatched Beza and Bude to the German can-
tons and to Germany itself, with all possible speed, in order to
take measures for the liberation of the prisoners, he addressed
the latter in a style of heroic earnestness. " We give you no
other counsel but that which we should ourselves wish to adopt,
were we in your case. It is better for us to hope for no safety
here, but to expect a certain death, rather than fix a stain on the
Gospel through our deceit or disbelief. Fruitful indeed are the
ashes of the martyrs, whereas mere human designs bring with
them sterility and a brand*.'5 At the same time he wrote to a mini-
ster, imprisoned in Piedmont, exhorting him to a similar exercise
of fortitude : this bold champion of the truth stood firm, was
strangled and burnt. It was commonly reported that when the
flames ascended, a white dove flew round about the fire, — an
image of the purity of the martyr, whose soul was ascending to
God.
Calvin expressed himself with great joy at the progress of the
Gospel in France. " Wonderfully," he says, " does God protect
the truth. The church in Paris has now four courageous mini-
sters ; and the number of the assemblies increases on all sides."
We see from a great variety of letters, that Calvin was daily
sending forth emissaries, who, although not always ministers,
* Ed. Laus. Ep. 243. Ed. Amstel. p. IT'2. MS. Gen. a Mile, de Pantigny.
360 EMIGRATION TO BRAZIL. [CHAP. XI.
were sufficiently advanced in knowledge to instruct those who
were disposed to learn ; and probably carried evangelical books
with them, as is done by the colporteurs of the modern evan-
gelical societies.
An emigration to the states of Brazil took place about this time.
It is an error to speak of a formal mission to that country ; but
it appears from a letter written by the minister of the emigrants,
Richer, that they occasionally employed their thoughts about the
conversion of the heathen. This experiment at colonization
dates from the year 1557. A certain Maltese knight, Villega-
gnon, had represented to the Admiral Coiigny, that he might
form a secure establishment in America, take with him the perse-
cuted believers, people the land, and convert the heathen. The
scheme appeared so feasible, that the admiral was altogether in-
clined to adopt it. A little island belonging to Brazil was taken
possession of by Villegagnon, and received the name of Coiigny.
Ministers and emigrants were now invited out. Geneva sent
Richer and Chartier ; but, contrary to the hope which he first
held out to the community, Villegagnon opposed the Calvinists,
persecuted them according to the French edict, and treated them
as deceivers. Four of them, after making an excellent confes-
sion of their faith, were by his orders thrown into the sea ; the
others fled to France *.
We have already alluded to the journey undertaken by Farel,
Beza and Bude, during the controversy on the Confession of
Faith, for the purpose of interesting the German princes in be-
half of the reformed. Frequent mention is made of these pro-
ceedings in Calvin's correspondence ; he did whatever lay in his
power to lessen the distress which prevailed, and set every en-
gine at work which could be employed for that purpose. The
state of political affairs seemed favourable to his efforts: Henry
II. required the help of the German Protestants against Spain.
But on the other hand, sad and discouraging were the dissen-
sions which the Lutherans had introduced into Germany. The
cantons sent a new embassy to the king : their petition was sup-
ported by the letters of the Elector Palatine ; and the king seemed
inclined to listen, the battle of St. Quentin having convinced him
that it would be impolitic further to embitter the Germans.
Calvin urged the elector Otto Heinrich to take a part in this work,
* Job. v. Lory, an eye-witness, has given an account of the horrors attend-
ing the journey home. He was subsequently a reformed minister at Bern.
See Diet, des Iiommes Illust.
A.D. 1558-60.] PERSECUTION IN FRANCE. 3G1
and earnestly entreated him to send an embassy to France*.
From a letter to the court-preacher Dillcr, we find that the
prince, deceived by false representations, would not follow the
example of the other princes in sending ambassadors : he had
been led to believe that the prisoners were already liberated.
The persecution in the meantime pursued its course. " In
February 1558/' says Calvin, in a letter to Farelf? " our very dear
friends Beza and Bude travelled for the third time to visit the
German princes. The king has besought three cardinals from
Antichrist to superintend the inquisition. The Cardinal Lorraine
has all the power in his own hands/' Beza had journeyed to
Frankfort, where an assembly of the electors was to be held :
the Germans expended their time as usual in long debate, and
approved the faith of the persecuted believers ; but they did not
arrive at the determination to interfere in their behalf, till many
of them had already suffered in the flames. Several prisoners
however were delivered through the intercession of the Protest-
ant princes. The delay which occurred might be attributed to
the unchristian influence of the Lutheran zealots.
It is well to observe how nobly Calvin laboured to cheer
and uphold the oppressed churches in the midst of these dan-
gers J. " The Lord/' he says, " guards us with more care,
than ever did a bird protect its young under the cover of its
wings. As we see that the reins are given to the devil, and that
he is suffered to trouble the poor church on all sides, place your-
selves again under the banner of Jesus Christ ; go into his school,
that you may daily be instructed better; and pray your God that
He may have mercy upon you as redeemed children."
When Calais, in 1558, was recovered by France, the king's
courage revived, and the cardinal succeeded in establishing the
tribunal of which we have before spoken; while Henry II. fa-
voured the Guises, he promoted the growth of parties, and the
misfortunes of the country. It is an error however to suppose,
as some have done, that the movements which now took place
were the result of political schemes formed under the mask of
religion. A sufficient number indeed of political springs had
been set in motion ; but faith was also exercising its mighty in-
fluence, as, in Germany, the proceedings of Maurice of Saxony
were not independent of religious impulses.
On the side of the Catholics, fanatical rage was not wanting;
* Ed. Laus. Ep. 257- Ed. Amst. p. 125.
t MS. Gen. Calw Farello, Feb. 2i, 1558. J MS. Gen. Mai. 2S, 1559.
362 PROGRESS OF THE REFORMED CHURCH. [CHAP. XI.
but the evangelical party were desiring truth. It is confessed*,
that inasmuch as the Calvinistic system had a moral tendency
far stricter than the Lutheran, while the court of France was
distinguished by its sensuality, a fiercer hostility was created
between the two parties in France than in Germany, where the
princes were more moral and temperate. The churches how-
ever grew and were strengthened in spirit ; although, according
to report, no fewer than fifty thousand Huguenots perished du-
ring the reigns of Francis I. and Henry Il.f Calvin now, for
the first time, called the evangelical " Protestants J.'5 Some ex-
citement was created by the news which was brought, that many
of the reformed wore the red cap, as a mark of distinction.
Calvin expressed his dislike to this custom in a letter to the
Admiral Coligny.
The affairs of the evangelical church now took another form.
Its martyrs had hitherto been for the most part of the humbler
classes ; but the great men of the kingdom now began to declare
themselves its champions, without however entering into formal
union. The king of Navarre went to liberate Chandieu, one of
the ministers of the church in Paris, with his own hand, from
prison. Andelot Coligny took the minister Carmel to his estate
in Brittany, and let him publicly preach there. Gaspar Coligny,
the admiral, remained, after the taking of St. Quentin, a prisoner
in the Netherlands. Calvin wrote to him in the elevated style
in which he was accustomed to address the great, and exhorted
him to read the Gospel. " You know," he said, "how depraved
the world is ; take heed then not to involve yourself in things
which may pollute you : everything is now permitted except
the confession of the true faith. Let us then so lay to our hearts
the honour of God as not to hesitate to tread all things under-
foot, when the extending of his kingdom is concerned, for the
grace of the Lord shines infinitely higher than the favour of all
mankind." Again : " This letter will show that I entertain a
holy care for you, and brings its apology with it." Again ex-
horting him to give himself wholly to the Lord, he says : " Trust
in the word of Christ, and all other things shall be added thereto."
Another letter was written the same day addressed to the wife of
the admiral, as if that already sent was not sufficiently im-
pressive. Coligny was converted ; and never had Calvin had a
scholar like this distinguished man, who, still in the prime of
* A thought suggested by Leo's Weltgeschichte, s. 219-
f Ruchat, t. vi. p. 320. J MS. Bern, Sept. 12, 1558. Calv. Farello.
A. D. 1558-60.] PROGRESS OF THE REFORMED CHURCH. 363
life, became a mighty instrument in the diffusion of the truth.
It was not till fourteen years after his conversion that he
ended his glorious career*. Calvin again wrote to the Lady
Coligny, expressed his sorrow at the captivity of her husband,
and reminded her that it was " her duty to help him, by her ex-
ample, to preserve his resolution." This was a grand period for
Calvin : the minister of Geneva was the pastor of all the great
men in France.
The ambassadors of the German princes now stood before
Henry II. : he answered them graciously, but kept none of his
promises. At this very time the members of the evangelical
church had assembled in the Pre des Clercs at Paris, and were
singing psalms in their customary strain of exalted devotion.
The king of Navarre and his queen were present ; multitudes
thronged to the spot, and many climbed the trees in the neigh-
bourhood that they might the better hear the sweet and sacred
melody. Henry was in the camp at Amiens. It was told him
that an insurrection had broken out. Andelot was accused, and
after making a bold confession was thrown into prison. Calvin
was ready with his encouraging exhortations. " He must
strengthen himself/' he said, " against all flattery, and against
every fear. He must be as Moses was, who left the Egyptian
court to take upon him the reproaches of Christ. We must con-
fess the Lord, or the Lord will not confess us." The prisoner
was treated severely. Calvin again addressed him : " God will
strengthen you by his Spirit. We must bear the image of Christ,
not in death only, but in burial ; even though we faint, and lie as
it were a long time under the earth. — The companions of Daniel
would not pray to the idol ; but they committed no crime against
their king."
But so grievously was Andelot afflicted, that he once allowed
himself to be conducted to hear mass. Calvin thus reproved
him : — " The enemies of the truth have celebrated their victory :
they have gained a triumph in your person, as they think, over
our Lord Jesus Christ, and covered his doctrine with disgrace.
Think on the martyrs, in the time of the Maccabees, who died
rather than eat the flesh of an unclean animal, because to have
done so would have been to testify against their belief. But I
will not overwhelm you with .sorrow."
The custom of singing psalms in the streets greatly increased
in the South, and led to some disturbances. Claude, a minister
* His death took place in l.">7_\
3G1 PROGRESS OF THE REFORMED CHURCH. [CHAP. XI.
at Lyons, relates that the faithful went singing through the
streets in the evening. The edict of the king, now published,
forbad this practice. This impelled a number of excitable minds
so much the more to sing their psalms in the night. Claude
prayed Calvin to employ his authority for the suppression of
such proceedings.
The year 1559 was still more unquiet. A peace was con-
cluded with Spain ; and, according to one of the conditions,
heresy was to be assailed and rooted out by every means that
could be employed. In the month of August it was heard that
Paul IV. had breathed his last, and had recommended the In-
quisition, as the only sufficient means for the purpose, to em-
ploy itself against the Protestants. But just as he was ex-
piring a popular tumult broke out ; the palace of the Inquisition
was torn down, and the prisoners were set free. The re-
formed churches of Switzerland were now in the greatest state
of agitation : this was especially the case with Bern and Ge-
neva ; but they were narrowly watched. Geneva, as the central
point of the light, was the most hated of all. It was the time
when rich and poor laboured at the fortifications ; and when we
look at the court of France, and at the death-bed of the pope, it
is interesting to turn round and behold the simple, energetic
reformer rising from his study-table, spread over with his Com-
mentary and his Institutions, and going forth to encourage by
his example the erection of the city-walls. It was at the end of
this year that he was admitted to the rights of a burgher*.
The Gospel was now extended throughout France. Bcza
speaks of a young man in Paris, named Jean Morel, who died
with remarkable fortitude. The priests proclaimed aloud, " Death
to all Lutherans;" and as soon as any one was so called, the
people fell upon him with unbridled fury. Some of those who had
been present on the night when the sacrament was administered,
and who were still prisoners in Paris, besought consolation from
Calvin, and he wrote to them in his usual comforting and ani-
mating strain f.
In the midst of these sanguinary persecutions, deputies from
all the reformed churches in France secretly assembled in Paris.
* Registres de 1559, 25 Dec. Many ministers and professors, it is said,
having demanded and obtained the right of citizenship, M. Calvin was re-
quested to accept it also ; he expressed his thankfulness for the honour, and
added, that he had not asked for it before, because he was anxious to avoid
giving any colour to the suspicions which some had wickedly suggested, as to
his wishing to gain political influence and power in Geneva.
t MS. Gen. Feb. 15, 1559-
A.D. 1558-60.] PROGRESS OF THE REFORMED CHURCH. 3G5
The well-known Confession of Faith was drawn up, and, with
the rule of discipline, reduced to forty articles : thus was esta-
blished the unity of the French church. The plan on which
this proceeding was founded had been formed after the admi-
nistration of the Lord's Supper at Poictiers, where many ministers
were assembled on the occasion. The first general synod met
at Paris on the 26th of May, 1559, and through the influence of
the minister Chandieu, the formulary was solemnly set forth in
writing on the 28th of the same month. Thus the foundation-
stone was laid, and herewith begins the life of the French re-
formed church*. The rule of discipline established for its
guidance realized the theory which Calvin had fully exhibited
in his ' Institutions,' but which he could only imperfectly exe-
cute at Geneva.
The Paris parliament was also assembled at this time, and
employed itself in devising measures for the suppression of
heresy. Some of the members spoke of a general council ; others
proposed to limit the punishment of heretics to banishment;
and some desired to know definitely what was meant by heresy ;
every one being able to perceive clearly the grievous errors of
the church itself. The truth conquered; and they would hear
no more of the punishment of heretics. But the papists were
rilled with alarm, and so wrought upon the king, that he resolved
to be present himself at one of the meetings of the parliament.
The assembly was held in the monastery of the Augustins, the
hall in which it usually met being adorned for the celebration of
the marriage of Elizabeth, the daughter of the king, with Philip
of Spain, and of Margaret, his sister, with the Duke of Savoy.
The king entered the assembly accompanied by the Guises and
all his courtiers. Every person was to be allowed to speak his
sentiments freely ; and the members of the council did so with-
out hesitation.
Among these was Anne du Bourg, nephew of the chancellor of
France, an excellent jurist, and distinguished for his legal know-
ledge above all others who attended the meetings of the reformed.
Having given God thanks that the king had come to hear the
* This is the Confession which Beza presented to Charles IX. in 1561 at
Poissy. It was subscribed in 1571, in a synod at La Rochelle, by Henry IV.,
the queen his mother, the Prince of Conde, Louis of Nassau, Coligny, Cha-
tillon, and all the ministers. It was printed in Latin in 1566 and 1581. See
Salig, ii. p. 273. A shorter confession, in eighteen articles, seen in Calvin's
letters, was, as the superscription shows, addressed to Henry II. Ed. Amstel.
p. 250.
366 ANNE DU BOURG. [CHAP. XI.
things which concerned the Lord Jesus Christ, and which princes,
before all men, were bound to defend, he spoke with the great-
est freedom, as God prompted him, and at last exclaimed, " It
is no light thing to condemn those who, in the midst of the
flames, confess the name of Jesus Christ *."
The king arose, profoundly agitated, and conferred with his
cardinals ; then immediately leaving the chamber, he commanded
Montgommery, the officer of the guard, to apprehend Du Bourg,
with some others. They were thrown into the Bastile. Several of
the councillors fled : the rest were obliged to submit. Thus was
the parliament, for the first time, dishonoured, and the king swore
that he wished with his own eyes to see Du Bourg burnt.
These proceedings took place in the month of June. An
edict was published at Ecouen to root out the reformed, and
similar orders were sent to all the provinces, with the threat,
that if the magistrates were not diligent in the work they should
themselves be punished. Du Bellay and Demochares were the
judges of Du Bourg. The churches gave themselves to prayer.
Their ruin seemed at hand ; but the king was destined to fall in
the midst of his triumph. It is well known that he was ambi-
tious to shine in a tournament, preparations for which were
made in the street St. Antoine, not far from the Bastile, where
Du Bourg was confined. The king himself reached the lance to
Montgommery : it broke against the breast of the monarch : a
fragment flew into his eye and injured the brain. Catherine,
moved by a species of presentiment, had entreated him in the
morning not to go to the tournament. The circumstance was
not forgotten, that he had expressed his desire to see with his own
eyes the burning of Du Bourg and the others.
The king died on the 10th of July, and in the house which
had been decorated for the nuptials. The festive-hall became
his funereal chapel, and was covered with tapestry, which repre-
sented the conversion of St. Paul, with the words, " Saul, why
persecutest thou me ? "
Francis II., a youthful monarch, the husband of Mary Stuart,
now ascended the throne. Catherine placed herself between the
two parties. Six of the Guises were at the court. Whenever
they became too powerful, she allowed the Protestants to gain
strength. But the young king survived his accession only seven-
teen months. Catherine promised to put an end to the perse-
* Calvin gives a lively account of Du Bourg to Blaarer in 1560. Ed. Laus.
Ep. 357. Ed. Amstel. p. 191.
A.D. 1558-60.] RENEWAL OF THE PERSECUTION. 367
cution. She was probably moved to express this determination
through the representations of an aged protestant, who recalled
to her recollection those better days when she herself was en-
raptured with the psalms of the Huguenots. Du Bourg had
resolutely rejected all offers of deliverance. Calvin took his part
in the business. Many of the great men of the kingdom were
aroused, as the Duke de Longuevillc and the Marquis of Rotte-
lin. The church in Paris addressed a petition to Catherine,
couched in very strong language, for Du Bourg. Conde, the
admiral, and Madame de Roye, exerted their influence with her
daily in his behalf. She was once sufficiently excited to say,
that the persecutions affected her, and that the reformed, who
died with such exemplary fortitude, proved that they were in-
spired by a more than ordinary wisdom. She added, that she
would learn what the doctrine was which could lead people to
meet death as joyfully as if they were going to a marriage feast.
This was the last indication of any sentiment in favour of the
reformed. The Guises had all the power of the government in
their hands (1560). Robbery and murder were still practised
against the evangelical party. Houses suspected of harbouring
them were forcibly entered. Nothing could be sadder than the
appearance of the children of the persecuted believers, who
wandered about helpless, from place to place, no one daring to
shelter them, lest he might himself become exposed to suspicion.
Calvin complained to Martyr and Bullinger respecting this sad
condition of the church. The priests declared to the people
that the reformed held their meetings in the dark, to eat children
and commit other abominations. Catherine was informed that
they had celebrated the festival of Easter (1560) with these
shameful deeds. Induced by the Guises and the Chancellor
Olivier, she gave the people of Paris permission to attack all
these heretics. The tumultuous persecution which followed con-
tinued from August to March. But the reformed never omitted
their customary service, and Beza gives a long list of those who
died happily in the fire.
Du Bourg was kept a close prisoner in the Basttle : he was
treated with every kind of severity, and frequently even put into
an iron cage. His trial was suddenly determined upon; the
Count-palatine Otto having sent ambassadors to require his pre-
sence in Heidelberg. The cardinal commanded that he should
be put to death, before the request of the count could be formally
made. When the church in Paris learnt that endeavours were
368 MARTYRDOM OF DU BOURG, [CHAP.XI,
being made to induce him to modify his confession, it besought
him, by the minister Marlorat, to persevere, since, if he did so,
his death would encourage many others to glorify God. He
obeyed this counsel, and found means to address the church in
an excellent epistle. Courage, wisdom, and a highly cultivated
mind, were manifest in his whole conduct. Always free and
mighty in spirit, he rejoiced in the Lord, and sang psalms, ac-
companying himself on a lute. When it was proposed to make
an experiment for his liberation, he rejected the offer, and exhi-
bited more and more cheerfulness as his end approached. His
sentence was read to him : it purported that he should be burnt
alive. " On hearing this," says Calvin, u he knelt down and
thanked God that he had deemed him worthy of so great an
honour as to allow him to die in the defence of eternal truth."
For four hours he looked forward with joyful countenance ex-
pecting death. At the place of execution, which was surrounded
by four hundred soldiers, he put off his clothes as tranquilly as
if he were going to bed. When the executioner fixed the rope
about his neck, he remarked that this was not necessary; for
that he should be burnt slowly in the fire, according to the
usual custom. He was however first strangled, and his body
was then burnt to ashes.
The historian Mezeray relates, that the death of this member
of the parliament made a greater impression on men's minds
than a hundred ministers with their sermons. The fate of Du
Bourg was that of many others after him. In order to detect
the Lutherans, images of the saints were placed at the corner of
the streets, and those who did not bow to them were imme-
diately apprehended. Sometimes money was demanded for wax
tapers, and a refusal was followed by committal to prison. The
whole country was shaken. The Guises were masters of the
government, and the young king and his mother were wholly in
their power. Some of the better-disposed men in the kingdom
met to consider measures for resisting this ruinous state of affairs ;
but their conscience was so tender, (a proof that they were led
by the spirit of the Gospel,) that they inquired of many jurists
and theologians in France and Germany, whether, in such a
state of things, it was justifiable to oppose an existing govern-
ment. It was decided, " That it was lawful to resist, if the
princes of the house then reigning placed themselves at the head
of the movement, and if the states, or the better part of them,
called them thereto."
A.D. 1558-GI.] CALVIN AND BULLINGER. 369
This decision was the beginning of the French civil and reli-
gious wars. Calvin's very strong expression on the subject
shows plainly that he was altogether opposed to this drawing
of the sword in France, however just the cause might appear.
The conspiracy of Amboise now followed. The king was ad-
vised to destroy Geneva, as the one source of insurrections. But
while all trembled, Calvin remained, according to the testimony
of the chancellor Roset, altogether tranquil. This also appears
from a letter which he wrote to Blaarer : — " They threaten us,
and this city especially, from the notion that it is here that all
insurrections have their birth ; or they act as if they believed
this, in order to have a pretence for abusing us. For almost the
whole month our neighbours have supposed we were on the
point of sinking. I have never however been able to believe
that we had anything really to fear, nor do I believe that we
now have ; but should the greatest peril arrive, supported by the
arm of God, we should await the issue undisturbed." So sharply
were the movements of Geneva and Calvin watched, that the
very words of the latter were repeated in the king's council*.
An assembly of the nobles was called, August 21, 1560, to con-
sider the evil tendency of the present agitation in the state.
Calvin acquainted Bullinger with these proceedings f. "Before
the discussion commenced, admiral Coligny suddenly rose, and
desired of the king and the council that the believers in Nor-
mandy should be allowed the free exercise of their worship. He
could bring 50,000 signatures to this petition." All present
wondered at his boldness ; but he was known as a knight with-
out fear and without reproach. The king of Navarre had re-
turned to his own territory. Beza was at present with hirn, and
the queen was gained for the gospel ; but no safe conduct could
be procured for Beza on his return to Geneva, and Calvin re-
proached himself for having exposed him to so much danger J.
He had written in June to Sturm and Hottornan§, desiring
them to persuade the German princes to address the king of
France. " We will do all in our power," he added, " to excite
the king of Navarre to demand the reins of government; for it
is plain that the kingdom must be ruined by these agitations,
this treachery and sloth. The pride of the Guises and their
* MS. Gen. Calv. Sulcero, Sept. 30, 15G0.
f Ed. Laus. Ep. 300. Ed. Amstel. p. 143, Oct. 1, 1560.
+ MS. Gen. Calv. Galla?io, 5 Non. Oct. 1560.
§ MS. Bern, 4 June, 15G0.
VOL. II. 2 B
3/0 STATE OF FRANCE. [CHAP.XI.
avarice can no longer be endured. The consent of the queen-
mother must be gained by the most earnest representations."
Those who were rightly disposed now anxiously urged the
assembling of a general, or at least a national council. The
admiral wished that in the meeting thus proposed, a decree
might be passed allowing freedom of religion. He promised
that this would be followed by the general tranquillity of the
country. Guise skilfully overthrew these plans, and referred to
the Council of Trent. All things were in disorder; but the
church in Paris, wonderfully strengthened, had the boldness to
hold its meetings even in the palace of justice; and Capel, one
of the ministers present, openly displayed in the council-cham-
ber the confession of the reformed church. It was now that
the famous assembly took place at Orleans, where such import-
ant measures were to be adopted. The design of annihilating
the Huguenots was frustrated by the sudden death of the king.
The whole Protestant church had just held in silence a solemn
day of penitence. Affairs might still take a prosperous turn.
Calvin was opposed to the mention of war, and entertained the
hope that everything might be brought to a happy conclusion
without the shedding of one drop of blood. King Anton listened
attentively to both him and Beza*. " When all trembled before
the Guises, the hand of God helped us. The death of the young
king must produce great changes f"
Calvin had soon reason to rejoice at the happy alteration in
the state of affairs. " God," he says, " who pierced the eye of the
father, has struck the ear of the son (Francis II. died of an ulcer
in the ear). But many, alas ! yield themselves to a foolish de-
light, as if the world could be changed in a moment ; and because
I do not sympathize with their folly, they accuse me of sloth.
Should however the persecution cease, a wonderful conversion
might be looked for in a short time."
Charles IX., only ten years old, was now king. Anton, to
whom the regency properly pertained, magnanimously left the
government to Catherine : the States said nothing, and the
Guises were more prudent than all. Conde remained of his
own accord in prison till he could justify himself : Calvin ap-
proved of his conduct. In the first assembly of the States, the
chancellor L'Hopital delivered a long discourse for the purpose
of tranquillizing all parties, and securing their obedience to the
* MS. Eccles. Bern, Calv. Sulcero, Dec. 11, 1561.
t MS. Bern, Calv. Stmmio, Dec. 1G, 15G0.
A.D. 1558-61.] STATE OF FRANCE. 371
young king: he was devoted to the Huguenots. Many were
dissatisfied. During these proceedings Pius IV. had made pre-
parations for the opening of the Council of Trent. Monluc,
bishop of Valence, jestingly remarked, that they were proposing
to extinguish the fires in Paris with the water of the Tiber, in-
stead of using the water of France itself. All the prelates of the
kingdom were to assemble on the 20th of January, 1561. The
pope was angry, and informed the queen that the sword must
be drawn ; that Spain and Italy would assist ; and that if she
did not wish to involve her own subjects in war, she must over-
throw Geneva, whence all the evil proceeded*. He gave the
same advice to the Duke of Savoy ; but they could not agree to
whom Geneva should afterwards belong.
The Waldenses were now assailed by a fresh persecution :
their indignation was roused, and they seized their weapons f.
This was the first example of the religious wars which were so
soon to follow. Calvin again expressed his admiration to Co-
ligny, and exhorted him to persevere in his onward course, how-
ever few might be found to imitate him J : — "Be content with this,
though the whole world should be blind and unthankful, that
God and his angels are for you ; and we must indeed satisfy
ourselves with knowing, that the heavenly crown cannot be taken
from us when we shall have virtuously finished here below the
warfare of the Son of God, in whom standeth our eternal life."
The pope invited the German princes to be present at the
Council of Trent §. Calvin wished that the king of France
would unite with the queen of England, the German princes,
and the Swiss, in a protest against the entire council ||.
Although the regent soon found cause of dispute with Anton
of Navarre, the position of the church daily improved. It was
forbidden to employ the word Huguenot as a term of reproach :
those who bore the name were to be undisturbed in their houses,
and those who had been thrown into prison were to be liberated.
The king went to Rheims to be crowned : there the cardinal of
Lorraine declared that the Catholic church was on the point of
ruin : he expressed his wish to hold an assembly of the clergy
in Paris as a preparation for a larger meeting. The edict of July
commanded peace, and heresy was to be punished with banish-
* Ruchat, t. vi. p. 371.
f MS. Bern, Calv. Leningo, Mart. 14, 1561.
J MS. Gen. Jan. 16, 1561.
§ Ep. 333 and 334 refer to this. Ed. Laus. Ed. Amstel. p. 178.
|| MS. Gen. 24 Sept. 1561.
2 B 2
372 FRANCE AND GENEVA. [CHAP. XI.
ment only. The prelates were summoned to meet at Poissy, near
St. Germain en Laye, where the court was held. Calvin had
looked for this at the beginning of the year, and he hoped that
the ministers of the new faith would obtain a safe conduct, so
that they might be heard in the assembly, and see whether a
union with the Catholic church might not still be possible. The
king of Navarre wrote letters with his own hand to Peter
Martyr, then at Zurich, and to Beza in Geneva.
Calvin's history becomes more and more intimately connected
with that of France : he lived wholly for the church, and the
church lived through him. Thus he daily sent out ministers to
form new congregations, and he supported it by his consolatory
addresses and his counsels : he was the soul of the whole.
Owing to this his vast spiritual influence, and the view which
the French took of the reformers as political malcontents, Cal-
vin was supposed to exercise great political power, whereas to
do so would have been a contradiction of his most fundamental
principles. True it is that he was in union with all the great
men of the party : even Coligny himself communicated to him
his plans, and regarded him as the head of the Reformation.
Scarcely had Charles IX. ascended the throne, when a letter
was addressed to the council at Geneva by the king, or rather
by Catherine. " His council and the States," it is said, " had
declared that all the disturbances in France had been occasioned
by the preachers sent into the kingdom from Geneva : he there-
fore prayed that peace might be restored; that the ministers
might be recalled; that no others like them should be sent;
that God and the world were witnesses, that the king would be
justified in taking vengeance on a city which was undermining
his state."
An answer was desired to this epistle: the ministers were
called before the council and replied through Calvin : — " They
could not deny, that when men applied to them and desired to
be admitted to the ministry, they admonished them to fulfil their
duty, and to spread the knowledge of salvation as the Lord com-
manded; but they denied that they were guilty of creating dis-
turbances in the kingdom of France. The Gospel was not
preached for such an end, and they had used their utmost efforts
to restrain those who had manifested a wish to go to Amboise,
and were ready to justify themselves before the king himself if
necessary."
This reply of the ministers was communicated to the king as
A.D. 1558-61.] PROGRESS OF THE REFORMED CHURCH. 37-3
their defence ; but it was added, that the council could not re-
cal those whom it had not itself sent forth. The Catholics had
indeed reason to think of these things ; for in respect to the in-
fluence exerted by Calvin in promoting the diffusion of the new
faith, it was estimated that, looking to France alone, there were
five million professors of the reformed doctrines.
This intelligence created great delight in foreign countries. A
minister named Beaulieu wrote to Farel from Geneva, October 3,
1561 : — " I cannot tell you how much grace God is daily bestow-
ing upon our church. There are men here from various places,
as from Lyons, Nismes, Gap, and from the districts of Orleans
and Poitiers, anxious to obtain labourers for these portions of the
new harvest. From Tournon especially was the application made,
and that in obedience to the urgent wish of the bishop. There
were five hundred parishes in these parts which had discontinued
the celebration of the mass, but were still without ministers.
The poor people were famishing, but there was no one to furnish
them with the bread of heaven. It is extraordinary how many
hearers there are of Calvin's lectures : I believe there are more
than a thousand daily. Viret is labouring for Nismes. I have
heard men say, that if from four to six thousand preachers were
sent forth, places would be found for them*."
Beza relates, that Catherine commissioned the admiral (1561,
immediately after the conference at Poissy) to number the
churches: there were 2150: the members of these petitioned
for edifices, and offered their goods and their lives for the use of
the state. Shortly after this, the whole of France seemed on the
point of becoming Protestant f.
The best commentaries and other works of Calvin were now
before the world, and had been placed in the hands of all classes
by means of numerous editions : his influence was at the highest
point. Peace was looked for in France ; the reformed religion
was triumphing ; the church in Paris flourished ; the numerous
persons of distinction who belonged to it were anxious to in-
crease its splendour; and Calvin was called to their aid; but
the council of Geneva would not part with him. Calvin was
not ungrateful, and he willingly remained in the little republic:
he assured the Parisian community however of his esteem, and
dedicated to it his { Commentary on Daniel J.'
* Ruchat, t.vi. p. 435. MS. Gen.Calv. toBullinger, May24, 1561
f Aymon, Svn. t. i. pp. 21, 218.
J Ed. Laus. Ep. 308. Ed. A.mstel. p. 151.
374 calvin's influence. [chap. xi.
When the duchess of Ferrara expressed her wish to have a
minister from Geneva, the council granted her request, with this
exception only, that neither Calvin nor Beza should be sent*.
Afterwards, when Beza was in France at the Colloquy of Poissy,
Calvin again expressed himself to the purport, that it was vexa-
tious to him to have it supposed that he wished to be called to
France f.
To understand the real nature of Calvin's influence in France,
we must read the extensive correspondence which he carried on
with those who were seeking the Gospel in that country. I have
already directed attention, in speaking of his pastoral labours, to
the number of affecting letters in which he urges it as a duty on
Protestants to leave Catholic France and seek a refuge in Ge-
neva J. The same sentiments are expressed in several of his
letters to entire communities : but now persons of high rank
submitted themselves humbly to his counsel, his warnings, and
even to the reproofs of the minister, in the same way as the
princes of Germany listened to Luther. And with what zeal did
he labour for them ! To show this the more completely, we must
refer to what has been stated in the earlier part of this work, re-
specting his correspondence with the duchess of Ferrara. When
an emissary from the king of France passed through Geneva,
on his way to Ferrara, to compel the duchess to return to Ca-
tholicism, and there was reason to apprehend her fall, Calvin in-
stantly despatched a messenger, named Colonge, to Ferrara with
a letter, which has been preserved, and in which he encourages
her to exercise resolution, and says that she ought to receive the
messenger, not as coming from him, but from God §.
Some years after he again wrote to her for the purpose of
strengthening her faith : — " Meditate carefully on the truth al-
luded to by Paul, namely, that if a perishable metal must be
proved in the fire, much less can faith be spared the trial ; but
if you feel that you are weaker than you ought to be, turn your-
self to Him who has promised that all who trust in Him shall be
as the tree planted by the water-side, which, with its living root,
shall never perish, whatever the storms which beat upon it.
Give not the devil the opportunity of surprising you, and do not
allow yourself to imagine, that by recanting you can avoid the
conflict. Your fears will give the enemy the victory which he
* Re'gistres, Juill. 3, 1561. f MS. Bern, Oct. 15(32.
I X I'Abbcsse do Thouars, &c. &c., 1553, 1554, 1558.
$ MS. Gen. 6Aoftt, 1554.
A.D. 1558-61.] THE DUCHESS OF FERRARA. 375
so greatly desires : we must be aware of his cunning to over-
come it. For the rest, harden yourself, dear lady, against the
frowns of the world. If you do good, this is the reward pro-
mised us from above."
Now, that is in the year 15 GO, after the death of her husband,
her presence was required in France, to take part in the go-
vernment. She was compelled to swear fidelity to the Catholics.
Calvin appealed to her : " Since you have sinned in this, and
offended God, you are not bound to keep this oath. You know
that Herod is not praised for having observed the oath which he
rashly took ; but is known rather to have fallen into twofold con-
demnation." Calvin dissuaded the queen from taking a part in
the government, suggesting that her counsels would not be re-
ceived, and that it was only intended to make use of her name.
He desired her to give herself wholly to the evangelical faith.
" Jesus Christ," he says, " is well worth your forgetting, for his
sake, France as well as Ferrara."
The duchess followed this counsel. In the persecutions, she
devoted herself to the care of the unfortunate fugitives, and the
old castle of Montargis, where she dwelt, obtained the name of
an Hotel Dieu. Calvin ceased not to exhort and encourage her
with edifying words : " As the wanderer in the evening redoubles
his steps, so ought advancing age to admonish you to leave a
good witness on earth, as well as to bring one before God and
the angels." His latest letters were addressed to her. In one
of these he accuses her of too passionate a disposition, which was
likely to produce much evil; but he praises her honest and pure
confession, which she not only repeated with her lips, but made
known by her noble actions, which nothing could surpass. The
severity of the reformer is strikingly exhibited in that which he
said to her respecting the consistory which she held in her castle,
and in the proceedings of which she took part. He earnestly
calls upon her to recollect, that as a woman she ought to respect
the authority of the consistory, and that she must subject her
people to the elders of the church. In conclusion, he sent her
a medal which her father, Louis XII., had struck, and on which
he was represented on horseback, with the inscription Destruam
Babylonem*. In reference to the question, who belonged to the
elect? he compared the death of king Anton with that of the
duke of Guise f.
This led to his correspondence with the king of Navarre : here
* MS. Gen. Jan. 8, 1564. t MS. Gen. April 1, 1564,
376 T1IE KING OF NAVARRE. [.CHAP. XI-
his words fell upon less fruitful ground; but he did not fail
through want of energy, and what the king several times did in
behalf of the reformed must be attributed to Calvin's influence*.
In the early period of the movement the monarch rendered sig-
nal service to the evangelical cause ; but he afterwards relapsed.
During the persecution in 1553, Calvin exhorted him to do that
which God expected of him. " You ought not to be ashamed
to bear the reproach of Christ, which is more honourable than
all the glory of the world f"
When king Anton, by the sorcery of Catherine, again proved
unfaithful, Calvin described his character with great force, and
related to Bullinger how severely he and Beza had chastised him
in their addresses J. He had been amused with the promise of
Sardinia, and flattered with the expectation thus excited^ he had
delivered at Rome a declaration against the reformed doctrine.
Calvin assailed him with the most indignant expressions : they
show how he could deal with kings : — " The enemy has flung this
dirt upon you that he might be able to sing a song of triumph
at your disgrace. What would it help you, though the whole
world were given you, if you had to do homage to the devil? § "
Kowr great the confidence was which the king had formerly
placed in Calvin, appears from the fact, that when he was in need
of money he applied to the poor minister, whose yearly stipend
amounted to only fifty dollars. Calvin obtained the required
help, and involved himself thereby in the greatest perplexity, as
he afterwards stated to the queen ||.
Things had now proceeded so far, that Calvin some months
after wrote to Bullinger, saying, that " there was now nothing to
hope from king Anton, for that he had given himself up to dis-
sipation/' Catherine had skilfully involved him in amours, and
was so successful in her schemes, that he continued permanently
her captive. This called forth a letter from Calvin, which, re-
* MS. Gen. Dec. 14, 1557. t MS. Gen. Juin 8, 1558.
t MS. Ecc. Bern. Calv. Bull. Mai 24, 1561.
§ MS. Gen. 1562.
|| MS. Gen. Juin 1563. Calvin, in his letter to the queen, states that he
obtained the promise of a loan of 40,000 francs for the king ; that the latter
sent in great haste for 25,000; that he immediately got 10,000 for him, and
that when the time came to pay this sum, he knew not on which side to turn
himself. " [ have never been," he said, " a financier, and I can assure you,
that of the little which I had, and which was a mere nothing, I hadexhausted
the last shilling, even of that which I needed for daily use. But at length,
God be praised, the payment was made." He spoke to the queen on the sub-
ject, not, he said, to ask for anything which he had given, but for the sake of
b i had helped him in the difficulty.
A.D. 1558-61.] THE QUEEN OF NAVARRE. 3/7
ferring as it did to so delicate a matter, is characteristic of the
writer : — " It is reported that you are hindered from doing your
duty by some ridiculous love-affair, and that the devil has given
you assistants, who seek neither your happiness nor your ho-
nour*."
Anton exhibited great repentance before his death, and vowed
that if God spared his life he would serve the reformed church
with entire devotion. Thus Calvin's words were not altogether
useless.
But the correspondence which he had carried on with the
queen had proved singularly edifying : he continued to the last
to derive joy and consolation from this truly Christian woman :
she it was who, in the season of distress which followed the Col-
loquy at Poissy, and when her husband had relapsed, uttered the
well-known words, " If I held my kingdom and my son in my
hand, I would rather cast them both into the sea than go to mass."
She brought up Henry IV. in her own spirit, and thus Calvin's
influence was not wanting in the formation of his character.
While there was still any hope of delivering the king, he urged
her, by the strongest arguments, to labour unceasingly to that
end. The king had chosen an enemy of Calvin, Balduin, as
tutor for his natural son. The reformer protested against this
step, and even with threats f. When the king, however had
actually gone over to the Catholic party, Calvin sent Johanna
many consolatory letters, as he did also during the religious wars.
After the death of the king at Rouen he supported her by his
counsel, advising her how to govern her dominions so as to se-
cure the triumph of the truth; a necessary caution, near as she
was to the king of Spain, whose dispositions were so little friendly
towards her. He advised her to do all things with caution, and
to entreat the German princes to further the cause of the Lord
with their wonted affection J.
It is interesting to hear Calvin's judgment on Henry IV., and
in contrast therewith his opinion of Charles IX. and the terrible
Catherine, who had not yet however wholly thrown off the mask.
Of the young king, whose disposition was ruined by his mother,
Calvin says§ : " The king is only nominally of age ; he is almost
slavishly subservient to the will of others : were he permitted to
think at all for himself, he would not be wholly opposed to us."
* MS. Paris. t MS. Gen. Dec. 24, 1561.
X MS. Palis Jan. 20, 15(33.
§ MS. Gen. Calv. Bullingero, 1 Non. Dec. 1563.
378 THE QUEEN OF NAVARRE. [CHAP. XI.
Calvin dedicated one of his latest works, the Commentary on
the last four books of Moses, to Henry IV., then a boy of ten
years*. He had alluded to him some time before, in a letter to
La Gaucherie, his tutor, whom he requested to greet the son of
the king for himf. The dedication abounds in noble and stri-
king admonitions, as if he had had the boy before his eyes, and
could guess the course of his future life. After bestowing di-
stinguished praise upon the mother of Henry, he continues : —
" Yours is the duty now to form yourself according to this pat-
tern of all virtues. If you belie the heroic spirit which animates
you, you will have so much the less excuse. Nothing can more
delight the queen than your advancing in the ways of piety/5
He reminds him of the examples of Josiah and Hezekiah ; warns
him against courtiers and flatterers ; against scoffers, who pretend
that there can be no piety in such tender years ; and against
pleasure; as if, in short, he saw his future career spread out
before him. In conclusion, he wishes for him, as Isaiah for
Hezekiah, that the fear of the Lord might be his true treasure.
Let us contrast with this what Calvin said of the treacherous
intrigues of Catherine. Although she took great pains to conceal
her actual opinions, and pretended to pursue a middle path, her
hatred to the Protestants was conspicuous over all. Her cun-
ning had long been apparent to Calvin J. Peter Martyr, her
countryman, formed a similar opinion of her, many as were those
whom she had deceived by her speciousness§. Another cele-
brated personage must also be mentioned, as exercising his
influence on those remarkable times. The admonitions which
Calvin and Beza could address to the prince of Conde, who some-
times forgot himself, like Anton, in the pleasures of the court,
show the noble character of their apostolic earnestness || : — "As
soon as the world hears that you devote yourself to the love of
women, your dignity and your fame will sink; the good will
grieve, the wicked will laugh. Distractions exist there which
cannot but hinder you in the fulfilment of your duty. Worldly
vanity will necessarily exercise its power, and you must watch
narrowly, or the light which God has given you will be extin-
guished!! We hope, gracious sir, that this warning will be ac-
ceptable to you, when you consider how useful and necessary
it is."
* Bern, 1553. The dedication was dated July 31, 1563.
f MS. Bern, Mai 26, 1559. X MS. Tigur. Calv. Blaurero, 1561.
§ Ed. Laus. Ep. 288. Ed. Amst. p. 139.
|| MS. Paris, Sept. 13, 1563.
A.D. 1558-G1.] REVIEW OF CALVIN'S CAREER. 3/9
We have not sufficient space to speak of the other great cha-
racters of the period ; but we may briefly mention the duchess
of Longueville, countess of Neuchatel, who came to Geneva,
commended by Farel, to converse with Calvin on religious sub-
jects*. On another occasion she hastened out of France with
her son to Neuchatel, and prayed Calvin to attend a synod there,
but which request the reformer could not fulfil : he frequently
corresponded with her, and in speaking of her to others, praised
her firmness and her faith. This was particularly the case in
his letter to the marchioness de Rottelin.
We may also briefly mention the sieur de Soubize, whom
Calvin advised as to his conduct in the case of some miserable
man, who is described as having fallen from the faith f. He wrote
to him on another occasion, urging in strong language the duty
of laying aside weapons taken up against the commandment of
the king.
Such was Calvin's reputation in the last period of his career,
that all who stood high in the reformed party desired to have
letters from him: these letters were themselves regarded as a
great distinction.
From this summit of his influence and greatness, won by the
energy of his spirit, we look back with pleasure to the commence-
ment of his course ; to his childhood ; to God's way with him ;
to the time when, as a boy twelve years old, he went to Paris
with the children of the Mommor family, and there, even at school,
became the sedate censor of his companions. We follow him
afterwards to the university, where he timidly kept himself retired,
because from nature he was fond of quiet and solitude ; while all,
on the other hand, who had a taste for pure learning, came to him,
a raw recruit, as he expresses it, for instruction ; so that his soli-
tary retreat was converted into a public school. And now we hear
him praising with a loud voice the goodness of God, who, as he
led David from the sheep-folds, and made him king of Israel,
had also exalted him, so little at the beginning, to the high office
of a herald and minister of the Gospel. " That which is to be
great," said Mathesius of Luther, " must first be little."
The review which we have taken of Calvin's important cor-
respondence with France will enable us the better to understand
the influence which he exercised in the following events.
* Kirchhofer, t. ii. s. 149, 1")Q.
f D'un miserable, homme de Hen : perhaps king Anton.
380 LUTHER AND CALVIN. [CHAP. XII,
CHAPTER XII.
BEZA AT THE COLLOQUY OF POISSY, 1561. HIS ACCOUNT TO
CALVIN. OCCURRENCES SEPTEMBER 9, 1561. THE RE-
FORMED CHURCH RECOGNIZED BY THE EDICT OF JANUARY
1562.
We now enter upon the last period of Calvin's active career.
The Colloquy at Poissy was, for the Reformed church, what the
Diet of Augsburg was for the Lutheran ; and Beza did in the one
place what Melancthon did in the other. The former was sent
by Calvin because " he could tread lighter than he could him-
self." To act, according to the meaning of this expression, was
no more given to Calvin than to Luther, and they were both
sensible of this point in their character. It is interesting to be-
hold Luther at the period here referred to. We find him in the
fortress of Ehrenburg, in Coburg. Guy Dietrich, who after-
wards became intimate with Calvin, was witness of his faith, firm
as a rock, and wrote to Melancthon : — " Dear Mr. Philip, I can-
not sufficiently admire his noble fortitude, his joy, his faith and
hope, in these lamentable times. Not a day passes in which he
does not devote at least three hours to prayer, as most profitable
to study. I was once so happy as to hear him pray. Help me
God ! what a spirit, what a faith, was in his words ! . . . . c I know
that Thou art our dear Father, therefore am I assured that Thou
wilt destroy the persecutors of thy children. But if Thou do it
not, the danger is thine, as well as ours : the whole affair is thine.
What we have done, we were obliged to do; therefore, dear Father,
defend it!5 When I heard him thus pray with a loud, clear
voice, my heart burnt within me for great joy. Therefore doubt
I not but that his prayer will afford mighty help in this, as men
think, our ruined state."
Calvin, who bore, as Beza says, all the churches in his heart,
exhibited a similar child-like trust during those perilous times
of which we are speaking. The affair which was now in agita-
tion was at first regarded as hopeless ; but Calvin, in his preface
to Daniel, exclaimed, addressing those who were engaged in the
struggle, "That stone which has crushed the idolatrous kingdom
to dust was not formed by the hands of man, and it is now grown
to a great mountain. I warn you to be peaceable in the midst
of the thunder of those threats by which you are assailed, till
A. D. 1561-62.] COLLOQUY OF POISSY. 381
the vain tempest-cloud shall be dispersed by power from above,
and disappear."
Beza states that Calvin not only employed himself in his own
retirement at home in praying for the church, but aroused the
people, by his sermons, to be diligent in supplicating God in
this great necessity. The syndic, according to his advice, issued
a public notice, in which the people were called upon to humble
themselves, and earnestly seek the house of God. The season
in which the Colloquy at Poissy occurred was marked by far
greater troubles than those which distinguished the period of the
German Diet. All depended upon a day. Luther was so happy
as not to live to witness the religious war; but Calvin had to
deal in France with the worst characters known to history. By
the instrumentality of the Guises, and Catherine, the church was
driven from its apostolic path, and assumed a warlike character,
whereby it acquired a more definite position, till at length
Henry IV. secured to the reformed a political existence. It was
not till some time after that the church returned, according to
Calvin's wish, into the path which it had left. Never however
did it, of itself, give occasion to the civil wars in France. We
may trace the whole of its subsequent trials to the events of which
we have now to speak.
Catherine, after frequently flattering the Protestants, had issued
the edict of St. Germain, which authorized the renewal of the
persecutions. The admiral Coligny now came forward, and in-
sisted that king Anton should take the place of Catherine as re-
gent : this induced the latter to seek a reconciliation of the two
parties, in order the better to secure for herself the support of
both. The heads of the Protestant church rightly looked for
much from these proceedings. It was now allowed them openly
to proclaim the truth ; and they were convinced, that if the
gospel were but freely preached, and especially by such able men
as Beza, or Calvin, they would obtain the victory. The king of
Navarre, moreover, had allowed himself to be convinced by Bal-
duin, that he might gain a great name were a union of parties
once accomplished*.
The hopes of all were excited by the summoning of the pre-
lates to Poissy. The heads of the Protestant party, anxious to
see Calvin there, had written to him on the subject. He and Beza
acquainted the council with the application, and prayed that the
latter might be allowed to go to Zurich, to ask Peter Martyr of
* Schlosser, Leben Beza's, s. 98. Ruchat, t. vi. p. 407.
382 OPENING OF THE COLLOQUY. [CHAP. XIT.
that canton for the important affair. He had received an invi-
tation from France, and was ready to travel to the French court.
The council would not suffer Calvin to join these two distin-
guished men in the journey unless hostages of the highest rank
were given for his security : his colleague however was prepared
to set off for Zurich and France. Zurich gave a friendly assent
to the application made respecting Martyr, and France now in-
vited both him and Beza in all proper form.
Beza gave good proof of his prudence in first consulting Bul-
linger on the manner in which he ought to express himself at
Poissy. Bullinger had shown great indignation on account of
the language used at Worms. Beza at length set out ; and Cal-
vin undertook to perform all his duties, in addition to his own,
during his absence. This was a fresh instance of his activity,
advanced now as he was in years, and oppressed by weakness *.
The opening of the celebrated assembly had been fixed for
August 10th, 1561 ; it took place on the 9th of September. The
states (etats generaux) of the kingdom were assembled at the
same time at Pontoise : it was there proposed that the queen-
mother should resign the regency, but she skilfully avoided the
danger. In an address to the king, the speaker said, that it was
the duty of his majesty to follow the example of king Josiah, to
read the Scriptures, to reform his kingdom, and allow the as-
semblies of the evangelical. The prelates met to prepare for the
Colloquy, and the ministers of the reformed church arrived at the
same time at Poissy; Marlorat, St. Pol, Merlin, Malot, Des
Gallars, and Spina : Beza and Martyr arrived later. They were
conveyed, for their security, to St. Germain en Laye, in the neigh-
bourhood of the castle. Those who first arrived presented a
petition to the king on the 17th of August. In this address
they besought him to make their confession of faith known to
his bishops, that they might learn their objections thereto ; but
they protested against the bishops being made their judges.
They desired that he himself, his mother, the king of Navarre,
and God's own word, should alone decide the cause. This peti-
tion they presented with their own hands to the king, who re-
ceived it friendly. Beza reached St. Germain, and without any
safe conduct, August 23, and Martyr still later.
* Among others, we may refer to the letter written August 27, 1561, MS.
Gen. Speaking of the death of Varrenus, he says, " He is happy, I am mi-
serable. We are unequal, in such paucity, to our burden." Some of the
absent ministers had to be recalled ; even Colonge from the duchess of
Ferrara.
A.D. 15G1-62.] OPENING OF THE COLLOQUY. 383
Beza now stood wholly exposed as a prey to the humours of
the French court, and Catherine. But that court beheld in him
a man of great accomplishments, of noble, elegant exterior; a
Frenchman ; mighty in speech ; faithful; endowed with presence
of mind, and ready at any moment to sacrifice his life for the
Gospel. He first appeared before the regent one evening in the
apartment of the king of Navarre, with many great personages :
she had the courtesy to ask immediately after Calvin's health ;
and the conversation was carried on till far into the night*.
Amidst all the tumult of parties, the public preaching of the
word was not interrupted. Sermons were delivered both in the
castle of St. Germain and in other places, before large assem-
blies of the nobility. The freedom thus enjoyed was even in-
creased by the arrival of the queen of Navarre. Beza received
a short letter from Calvin, in which the latter warns him against
allowing the Lotharingian to make him too secure, and adds jest-
ingly, " I warn you that I am also a brother of the cardinal of
Ferrara ; for when he once embraced me here, thirteen years ago,
he promised always to entertain for me the most brotherly affec-
tion : take care, therefore, not to oppose yourself too proudly to
me, for I could return like with like." He desired that Des Gallars
might be sent back to him as soon as possible.
As on the 8th of September the clergy had received no answer
to their address presented on the l?th of August, they again
applied to the king, and requested information to be given them
in writing. Their petition was read in the presence of the whole
court : the queen let them know that they must be content with
her verbal assurance, that the bishops would not be their judges.
Immediately after this, twelve Parisian priests, Sorbonnists, en-
tered, and besought the queen not to allow heretics, who refused
to recognize the bishops as judges, to dispute with them, which
would occasion great scandal. They were answered, that it had
been determined that the reformed should be heard. A royal
secretary was directed to prepare the protocol : the Sorbonnc pro-
tested against it.
Beza was permitted daily to proclaim the word of God before the
king of Navarre ; and so affected him, that he led him to mistrust
the jurist Balduin, who had been invited to prepare the way for a
union, and brought with him from Germany a double-meaning
* Beza gave an account of his interview and proceedings to Calvin, August
25, 1561. See also his Hist. Eccles. p. 494, and Ed. Laus. Ep. 309. Ed.
Amst. p. 154.
384 OPENING OF THE COLLOQUY. [CHAP. XII.
treatise by Cassander, on the subject of religious communion.
Beza was profoundly moved before the opening of the assembly.
In a letter to Calvin* he says, " We in the meantime pray to God
without ceasing, and are confident that the prayers of those at a
distance will not be without fruit. If our friend Martyr hasten
hither, his arrival will greatly strengthen our souls. We shall
have to do with old sophists ; and although we depend on this
that the simple truth of the word will conquer, it is not for every
one to solve their subtle falsehoods, and to meet their quotations
from the fathers with others. When I consider these difficulties,
I am full of anguish, and greatly lament the sin of which we are
guilty, in tempting the goodness of God, by leaving the most ex-
cellent of his instruments unemployed. We have resolved how-
ever not to retreat a step, and we commit ourselves to Him
whom the world cannot overcome. Lastly, dear brother, as you
are unable to aid us by your presence, guide us like children by
your counsel, and in all other ways, though from a distance.
That we are nothing better than children, I see and feel daily ;
and I would that our Lord would glorify the praise of his won-
drous wrisdom by your mouth."
The next day, September 9, which was appointed for the con-
ference, the assembly met about noon in the great refectory of
the nunnery at Poissy. The king, only just twelve years old,
sat upon a throne : on his right hand were his brother the duke
of Orleans and the king of Navarre ; on his left, the queen-mother
and the queen of Navarre ; and behind him numerous princes
and nobles. On each side of the hall were three cardinals.
Before them sat thirty-six bishops and archbishops; and behind
these a crowd of doctors and clergymen of all ranks. Silence
having been commanded, the king delivered a short address on
the object of the assembly, and the means to be employed for
restoring the peace of the kingdom. The chancellor then spoke:
he stated that the nation stood exposed to ruin through the pre-
valence of religious discord ; and he admonished the meeting,
that if, perchance, corruptions had been introduced into the
church, by avarice or sloth, they ought to oppose them with the
whole weight of their authority ; while the other party must rest
assured, that it should no longer be said, that they were con-
demned unheard.
The ministers of the reformed church now approached, con-
* Ed. Laus. Ep. 310. Ed. Amst. p. 157. Beza Calvino, Aug. 30, 1561.
A.D. 1561-62.] PROCEEDINGS AT THE COLLOQUY. 385
ducted by Francis Guise ; they were twelve in number, and
were habited in their usual simple style. Twenty-two deputies
of the various congregations accompanied them ; and the whole
party now stood bareheaded, before the court. Beza, addressing
himself to the king, began : — " The help of God is necessary to
success, whatever be the undertaking :" saying this, he imme-
diately knelt down and prayed. He commenced with a simple
confession of sin, which to the present day serves as the intro-
duction to every service in the reformed church. This being
repeated, he said, u May the Lord render this important day pro-
fitable to his own honour, and to the salvation of France, and of
all Christendom !" He then rose, and turning to the king, de-
livered a long discourse, in which he first endeavoured to confute
the accusations brought against the reformed, and especially the
error of the bishops, who sought to make it appear that the
ministers of the new faith were anxious to set aside the higher
offices of the Catholic church. " Do not believe," he said, " that
in our poor estate we wish to liken ourselves to you ; for rather
do we desire to build the walls of Jerusalem, and to establish the
spiritual Temple/' He next showed, that, in the main doctrines,
the reformed agreed with the Catholics ; and then passing to the
controverted points, he carefully enumerated them.
Beza was heard with profound attention. But when he began
to touch upon the sacrament of the Lord's Supper, and yielding
himself to the zeal imparted to him by the Zurichers, let fall the
words, ' that the body of Christ is truly given us, but that, as to
place, it is as far from the bread as heaven is from earth,' a sud-
den uproar arose among the cardinals and the bishops. Some
seized upon the opportunity to exclaim, " He has blasphemed."
Others stood up, and prepared to depart, without taking any
notice of the presence of the king. The cardinal Tournon now
rose, and prayed the king to command Beza to be silent, or to
permit him and his party to withdraw ; but neither was allowed.
Beza then addressed the prelates, and said, " My lords, I beseech
you to hear the end, which will content you :" and continuing
his speech, he confuted the accusations brought by those who
pretended that the reformed were engaged in exciting the people
to rebellion. Having ended his argument, he again knelt down
with all his companions, and presented to the king a copy of the
confession of the reformed church*.
The cardinal Tournon now spoke : he prayed the king not to
believe anything which had just been said, but to remain true to
* Hist. Eccles. p. 520.
VOL. II. 2 c
386 PROCEEDINGS AT THE COLLOQUY. [CHAP. XII.
the religion of his forefathers ; he also desired that a day might be
appointed, when he might answer Beza at length. The day after
the conference, Beza apologized in writing for the rough ex-
pressions which he had used in regard to the sacrament of the
Lord's Supper. It is easy to see however that the bishops only
sought a pretence for breaking up the meeting. It is no less
easy to discover, how deeply infected the queen and her courtiers
were with error, and how far from conversion, when so noble a
testimony to the faith could make no impression on their hearts.
Sometimes indeed there was an appearance of assent, but they
were employed solely in political intrigues.
In the meantime a letter arrived from Calvin : it affords evi-
dence of his penetrating understanding, and speaks clearly of
the issue of the conference. He had heard that a snare had been
laid for the brethren ; and that they had been required to sub-
scribe the Augsburg Confession, in order to separate them from
the Swiss *. " Let the others/5 he says, " think what they please,
I am convinced that nothing good is intended, whatever they
may promise. Believe me, the bishops will never allow it to come
to an earnest disputation. They who are at the helm will rather
be driven to extremities than be compelled to order : if it were
left to them to prescribe conditions, they would probably engage
in a little agreeable skirmish ; but now they find that they must
submit to certain laws, they will openly reject the proposal of a
discussion. But if they pretend to arm themselves for the con-
flict, you have Peter Martyr, who, according to my reckoning,
will have reached you at the right time. Although I have begged
you so much not to speak of me, you cease not to oppose my
wish : this in my judgment is not good. I have designedly barred
the door against myself in my preface to Daniel. Not that this
labour undertaken by you would be contrary to my inclinations,
or that I should shrink from danger, but because I think that my
presence is not required, where there are so many well-instructed
and able persons. And certainly all, you and Merlin excepted,
are sufficiently impetuous. The Augsburg Confession is, as you
know, the torch of the Fury, who wishes to kindle a fire which
would consume all France. But we must understand with what
design this confession is pressed upon us : its lukewarmness has
always been displeasing to the ardent : it was unsatisfactory to
its author, and was chiefly intended for popular use ; — not to
mention, that its brevity has given rise to some obscurities, and
* Calvin to Beza, Sept. 10, 1561. Ed. Laus. Ep. 313. Ed. Amstcl. p. 156.
A.D. 1561-62.] PROCEEDINGS AT THE COLLOQUY. 387
that there are even deficiencies by which the truth appears
mutilated. It would, moreover, be contrary to sense, to reject
the French confession and adopt this. What materials for strife
should we not thereby prepare for the future ! since the greater
part of the multitude will rarely give up a confession already re-
ceived. I deny therefore that the cardinal and his creatures can
have any honourable intentions, if they pretend to accept this
confession ; but they lay traps for you, hoping that thereby the
present conference may be stopped, and all things thrown into
confusion. I suspect, and indeed almost firmly believe, that a
book was printed by Balduin, at Basel, for this purpose."
When Calvin however heard of the great day, he, like all
others, was wonderfully inspirited, and exclaimed, " O happiest
of all days, on which that freedom has been given to the church,
which could not indeed fail to be given her, but which it has
cost so much labour to win !" " Your speech," he says to Beza,
" is here : God wonderfully guided both your spirit and your
tongue. The word, which so greatly excited the wrath of the
holy fathers, could not have been left unspoken, unless you had
been willing shamefully to conceal the truth, and to expose your-
self to the insults of these people, who, greatly to my wonder,
made so much noise about this thing only, whereas they were
struck no less heavily by other passages in your speech. It is
ridiculous for them to pretend that the conference was broken up
through your stumbling on this expression. They would have
found out a hundred other causes of offence, though they now
fasten so angrily on this one especially, as if they wished it to be
believed that they were ready to subscribe to all the rest of our
doctrine : we have therefore reason to rejoice that things have
thus happened. I am anxious to see how the cardinal will con-
trive to repair his rags. If they have thus made an end, as I
suspect they have, of the skirmish before the battle, they will
never come, 1 believe, to a real fight. Although I have warned
you not to be too hasty in requiring your dismissal, yet the legate,
I must tell you, will be doing me a very acceptable service by
allowing you a speedy departure."
The Catholic theologians had in the meantime assembled
among themselves. The cardinal of Lorraine opened the meeting
with these words : " Would that we had all been dumb or deaf!"
It was resolved that the cardinal, aided by Claude d'Espence,
should write a speech, the two main points of which should re-
spect the church, and the sacrament of the Lord's Supper. It
2 c 2
388 PROCEEDINGS AT THE COLLOQUY. [CHAP. XII.
was also determined that they should draw up a counter-confes-
sion, which the reformed should be called upon to subscribe,
and that if they refused, they should be condemned, and the
conference broken up. The reformed, on being made acquainted
with this proceeding, applied to the king, and the chancellor ac-
knowledging the weight of their objections, the plan was frus-
trated.
On the 6th of September the second meeting was held. The
cardinal, who had d'Espence at his back, delivered the speech
which had been prepared, and which concluded with the words,
" If the Protestants adhere to their belief, that Christ is in heaven
only, and not on earth, then I confess that I am as far from their
opinion as heaven is from earth/5 As soon as he had ended,
Tournon rose to depart ; but Beza said, and in the name of the
ministers with him, to the king, " that he was ready immediately
to answer the cardinal; and that if they would not hear him
then, he desired them to appoint a day, on which the subject
might be treated according to the Holy Scriptures." The
bishops also turned to the king ; and the latter informed the mi-
nisters, by the captain of the guard, that a time should be ap-
pointed for hearing them.
Beza and his companions were anxious to be heard imme-
diately on the following day ; but it was not till after a week
that they obtained their wish. A third meeting was appointed
for the 24th of September ; it took place in a small apartment, in
the presence of the queen-mother and the queen of Navarre. The
princes, the council, five cardinals, with sixteen doctors and
bishops, wrere also present. The Protestant church was to be
represented by the ministers ; among these was Peter Martyr,
who had arrived three days before.
In this conference Beza spoke of the doctrine of the church,
and occupied, as he states, an hour and a half in his speech : all
heard him with the greatest attention, and he hoped that much
good might follow his address. The cardinal, and a monk, De
Xantes, answered him with the utmost vehemence; but the
former passed suddenly to the doctrine of the sacrament : " See,"
he said, drawing a paper from his pocket, " what I have lately
received from Germany : it is signed by forty-two ministers."
This was the Wiirtemherg Confession, of the year 1559, and in
which it was said, that the communicants receive the body of
Christ truly, actually, and sacramentally. But the doctrine of
transubstantiation was rejected. The passage in which this was
A.D. 1561-62.] PROCEEDINGS AT THE COLLOQUY. 389
stated, the cardinal omitted to read, but immediately demanded of
the ministers whether they were willing to subscribe this docu-
ment. " d'Espence," says Beza, " thought that we should not
shrink from the word ( actually/ if the witness of a great man
was cited to us : he therefore quoted three passages out of your
own work against Hesshus. I interrupted him by observing, that
I recognized the words of my teacher ; but when I was preparing
to answer, the purple autocrat would not allow me. I offered
to prove to the queen not only the article on this point, but
our whole confession ; and I concluded by asking the cardinal,
whether he would himself subscribe what he proposed to us.
Caught in this net, he began to seek some subterfuge."
It was the object of the cardinal, as Calvin had shown, to
perplex the reformed. By refusing to subscribe the Lutheran
confession, they would become hated in Germany; while, by
subscribing it, they would render themselves obnoxious to the
Swiss. The design of the cardinal to break up the conference
wTas obvious ; and Calvin declared himself, from this time, op-
posed to the Augsburg Confession. It would have been incon-
sistent, he said to the king of Navarre, to receive this, and reject
that to which they had solemnly pledged themselves. " If they
had not so glorious a subscription as the blood of martyrs, yet
was their confession drawn from the pure word of God, and had
been already presented to the king*."
We return to the proceedings of the Colloquy. On the 26th
of September the ministers presented a writing to the queen, in
which they complained that they had been attacked, in the pre-
ceding conference, on their ministerial calling ; that an effort
had been made to induce them to sign a confession ; whereas
they were not there for themselves alone, but had the eyes of a
million Protestants upon them and the conference : they desired
a well-regulated discussion. Beza was answered by the cardi-
nal, who exhibited no slight degree of warmth and excitement,
that the Catholics had a right to complain of those who had
forced themselves into their churches without a call ; that the
reformed did not desire peace, for that they were seeking to over-
throw the two main supports of the kingdom of France, that is,
the ecclesiastical and the royal authority ; and he described them
as enemies, who ought to be instantly carried before the ma-
gistrate.
Beza replied, that " If the Catholic party would first subscribe
* MS. Paris, 1561, au Roy de Navarre.
390 PROCEEDINGS AT THE COLLOQUY. [CHAP. XII.
the Augsburg Confession, all might still be well." The doctrine
of the Lord's Supper was now again brought forward. Peter
Martyr spoke learnedly, in Italian, on the whole subject, and
compelled all to enter into the very heart of the question. The
queen-mother listened with attention; but the cardinal inter-
rupted the speaker with the remark, " That he wished to have
to do with those only Avho understood his language."
The Spaniard Laynez, the general of the Jesuits, now rose :
he spoke for an hour; heaped abuse upon the Protestants;
called their ministers "apes and foxes;" and asserted that they
had submitted themselves to the Council of Trent. Beza an-
swered him as he deserved, exposed him to ridicule, and con-
tinued the discussion with d'Espence.
But this conference proved fruitless. After much contention,
Beza relates, night came on : all prepared to depart. The queen
then called Beza and the cardinal into the midst of the assembly,
and adjured them, in the name of God, to seek peace. All pre-
sent rushed tumultuously around them : the strife was renewed :
a confused murmur arose, and the increasing night alone put an
end to the uproar. Overpowered with weariness, Beza, before
retiring to rest, wrote to Calvin : " Here everything is dis-
agreeable to me, compared with my very dear Geneva, the
thought of which alone revives me."
The queen-mother now resolved that Monluc, a moderate ca-
tholic, d'Espence, and three others, should confer with Beza and
Martyr, Des Gallars, Marlorat and L'Espine, respecting an
agreement on the subject of the sacrament. In a second con-
ference, held September 29, after these five had employed three
days on each side in deliberation, a formulary was prepared
which created general satisfaction*. All now believed, that as
there was an agreement on the main point, every difficulty was
removed. The queen ordered Monluc and Beza to be called
into her presence ; she expressed to them her entire approval.
The cardinal, who also came, declared that he had never believed
otherwise than what was now stated, and that the convention
itself would doubtless be content with what had been done.
But the contrary to what was expected happened. When the
formulary was presented to the whole assembly, though approved
by many, it was rejected, after a debate of six days, on the 9th
of October, by a majority of voices, as heretical. The cardinal
was severely censured for his conduct : a counter-statement was
* See Schlosser, Leben Bcza's, p. 142.
A.D. 1561-62.] LETTERS OF CALVIN. 391
to be drawn up, showing the insufficiency and the defective cha-
racter of the confession. The doctors and prelates declared that,
if the reformed should refuse to subscribe the articles of belief,
which it was now proposed to lay before them, they would se-
parate from them for ever, and they must be banished as here-
tics from the kingdom. But notwithstanding this threat, a
triumph was hereby prepared for the evangelical church. Cal-
vin, oppressed with sickness, again cherished the hope that their
affairs would prosper nobly.
« I can scarcely describe to you," he says, in a letter to Beza*,
« how happy your letters make me ; they place me in the midst
of your proceedings: although our circumstances are not on all
sides prosperous, we have more occasion for joy than for discon-
tent and anger. Praised be our God, again and again, who in-
tends to exalt us, as it seems, above the clouds, that we may
embrace the feet of the victorious Christ, and look down trium-
phant from above upon our enemies, his as well as ours. 1 can
give you nothing for thanks, unless you would be satisfied with
brass instead of gold. That you may know however that while
you are contending on the battle-field, in the sweat of your
brow, and with all earnestness, I am here, in the shade, carrying
on an easy conflict, I send you my answer to Balduin's libel, lie
cautious not to object to anything therein, lest I should say that
you belong to the faction which it will most displease."
Soon after this his hopes again declined, and in the same me-
lancholy state of his health he wrote to Bezaf : " I should have
committed the task of writing to you to another, had I not feared
that your distress and apprehensions might have been thereby
increased. I should not be sorry to see the Colloquy broken up
by our opponents under any circumstances : events are far from
being sufficiently ripe to encourage the hope that pure religion
can flourish with the consent of these men. To have been
contented with only a part of what we asked, would have been
nothing else than to interrupt the free course of truth. ^ 1 could
wish that in the present matter (the breaking-up of the Colloquy |
you were ready to yield."
Now followed an intrigue with the German theologians, whom
the cardinal had summoned with the design of increasing the
confusion %. Balduin appeared with the work written by Cas-
* Ed.Laus. Ep.317. Ed.Amstel. p. 159, Oct. 7, 1561, to B«
t Ed.Laus. Ep.323. Ed.Amstel. p. I62,0ct.l5, 1561.
{ Beza, Hist. Ecclcs. p. 612-644.
392 TERMINATION OF THE COLLOQUY. [CHAP. XII.
sander, but too late to obtain applause, and already answered by
Calvin. Jacob Andrea and his companions had an audience :
they wished to compel a subscription to the Augsburg Confes-
fession, and, not succeeding, returned discontented home. The
regent indeed said to the Tubingen theologians at their de-
parture, that she was heartily attached to the Confession of
Augsburg ; but these words availed nothing. On the 13th of Oc-
tober the prelates retired from Poissy, but first made the king
certain grants, so that it was commonly reported, that the con-
vention had only been assembled in order to frighten the church,
and to drag money from her*.
Such was the end of the celebrated Colloquy, which, through
the sin of the clergy and of the queen, who were only anxious to
avail themselves of the assistance of each party to oppress them
both, remained apparently without result. But it was followed
in reality by the most important consequences. The Protestants
were now, for the first time, openly recognized, and their cause
at once acquired unheard-of success. No one can justly accuse
Calvin or Beza of extravagance in the views which they advo-
cated at the Colloquy : they were in no wise enemies to episco-
pacy, and had never desired its abolition. Beza declared this
distinctly in his first speech* But the cardinal of Lorraine had
from twelve to fifteen benefices, bishoprics and archbishoprics ;
and was accused at the same time of corrupting all the fairest
women at the court. How could men of this kind be made con-
tented with one bishopric, one woman, and the severe Calvinistic
moral code ?
Beza was anxious, when Martyr left, to return to Geneva.
On taking leave of the queen-mother, she said to him, "You
are a Frenchman : we would fain avail ourselves of your aid to
try whether we may not quiet the agitation of the kingdom."
This compelled him to remain. The reformed began to preach
publicly in all parts of the country ; they even possessed them-
selves of some of the churches in various places, and experienced
little resistance. Calvin was displeased at this, and expressed
himself against it to Farel and Beza. When the command of
the king was issued directing the immediate surrender of the
churches, the reformed obeyed at once the direction of their
ministers. Pastors were called for on all sides : the queen of
Navarre desired to have three sent her. Calvin now exhorted
Beza to remain in France for the sake of establishing the church.
* Beza, p. 665.
A.D. 1561-62.] STATE OF AFFAIRS IN FRANCE. 393
" You must remain," he wrote to him, " unless we would betray
our own cause, and let the church, exposed now to the greatest
danger, be altogether ruined." The prince of Conde, the queen
of Navarre, and the admiral Coligny, addressed the council of
Geneva that they might retain Beza in France : he was work-
ing beneficially on both parties.
It was at this time that the pope desired Philip of Spain to
gain over Anton of Navarre for the Catholics. The Spaniards
had deprived him of his territories, and it was proposed to him
to separate from his present queen and marry Mary of Scotland.
If he accepted this proposal, he was to be put in possession of
Sardinia. He agreed to what was desired and rejoined the Ca-
tholics : the latter were therefore as little sincere in their wish
for union as they had formerly been at Worms. Catherine
however sent a plan of reformation to Rome, and the convention
was dissolved. The so-called triumvirate, consisting of the duke
of Guise, Montmorenci, and St. Andre, had now been formed.
Catherine wished to employ the force of the evangelical party
against this alliance, and she desired the admiral to give her the
number of the reformed churches : she even inquired what num-
ber of troops they could bring her ; and hence the Protestants
in France were converted into a political party. Legitimate au-
thority was employed in giving it this character. The queen
ordered a manifesto to be read in all the churches ; it stated,
" That she was ready to employ the assistance of the Protestants
against the foreigners, who, under the pretence of religion, were
prepared to invade the kingdom." All the objections urged
against the reformed fell to the ground when this was said.
Beza employed his time in Paris in labouring to spread the
pure doctrine : he himself speaks forcibly in his letters to Cal-
vin of his preaching in the Faubourg St. Antoine, and afterwards
in the Medards-Kirche, and of the tumult and conflict there,
when the priests rang all the bells to drown the voice of the
preacher in the church-yard, and how thereupon the church was
stormed. The reformers now preached for the first time under
the protection of the magistrates, and they led ten priests bound
through the streets of Paris. At length the edict of January
1562 was granted : by this the regent, as the rightful authority,
secured to the evangelical church the free exercise of religion.
The edict was published on the 6th of March. It was for Beza
to manage the whole affair: his situation was one of great per-
394 CONFERENCE AT ST. GERMAIN. [CHAP. XII.
plexity: Calvin constantly exhorted him to remain*; but the
people of Geneva feared to lose him for everf.
Preparations were made in February 1562 for another Col-
loquy. The regent thought that if she could bring the two par-
ties to an agreement on the subject of images, all the rest might
soon be arranged. A conference was accordingly held between
the Sorbonnists and the Reformed in the great hall of the palace
at St. Germain, and in the presence of the court. The first sub-
ject of discussion was the worship of images : this Beza treated
with his customary skill. The Catholic bishops delivered their
judgment on the other side : it was marked by moderation.
The image of the Trinity was forbidden, and all superstitious
observances were rejected ; but Beza would yield nothing on this
point. No dispute was to take place on this occasion respecting
the sacrament. Calvin objected to Beza, that in his discussions
with the Catholics, he depended too much on the testimony of
the fathers.
Beza answered the Sorbonnists in a very eloquent treatise,
which he presented to the regent upon his knees ; and prayed
her to remove images from the churches, particularizing those of
the Trinity and of the Virgin, and those which were placed by
the way- side, with the crucifixes, before which the people were
accustomed to prostrate themselves. As the general of the Je-
suits spoke much in allusion to the Council of Trent, the re-
formed declared, in an epistle to Catherine, that they themselves
heartily desired a christian, a free, general council ; one at
which the churches of England, Scotland, Germany, Denmark,
Poland, Sweden, and Switzerland, might be represented ; pro-
testing only against a repetition of the Council of Constance^
and the appointment of the pope as judge of its proceedings,
instead of submitting the whole to the rule of God's word. It
seems that Calvin's opinion had been asked respecting the con-
ditions of such a council. The ministers proposed it at the end
of the meeting at St. Germain.
* Ed. Laus. Ep. 330. Ed. Amst. p. 1C5. He told him that he must on no
account forsake his post, as long as he was permitted to remain, unless he was
sure of leaving behind him some faithful successor. " If you suffer violence,"
he added, " you must bear it with patience. He who is compelled to depart
docs not forsake his post. If by the will or the permission of the church you
are removed, there is nothing to say against it."
T MS. Gen. Calv. Bezre, 19th Nov. 1561. The senate, Calvin says, was
full of anxiety about him. Also, Jan. 1562, MS. Gen. : — The brethren were
wonderfully rejoiced, he says, at receiving letters from him. Of himself he
says, " I feel deprived of I know not what, while you are absent."
A.D. 1562-63.] EDICT OF JANUARY 1561. 395
The reformed faitli was, in the meanwhile, wonderfully suc-
cessful: Calvin had the delight to see the Gospel established
on a firm foundation*. The edict of January was the first vic-
tory of the evangelical church in France f : it was there declared,
" That the king, by the edict of July, had strictly forbidden the
holding of any assembly ; but that this had not been observed :
that he now therefore commanded the reformed immediately to
vacate the churches which they had taken ; to refrain from throw-
ing down any cross or picture ; to hold no meetings in any town ;
but it was added, they might, without being punished, assemble
outside the towns for the purpose of religious worship : those
who interfered with them in such cases should be severely pu-
nished: consistories and synods might also be held with the
knowledge, and in the presence, of the proper authorities." Cal-
vin remarked on this, that if the points here stated were properly
observed, the papacy was overthrown J; and this was also felt
to be the case by the opposite party. The progress of the Re-
formation in France thus far resembled its course in Germany.
The confession drawn up at Augsburg wrought with a distinct
and quickening force; but it could not prevent the religious
conflicts of after-years.
We have some interesting information respecting a conference
which took place at this time, and which was held for the pur-
pose of putting a blind before the eyes of the German princes.
In the winter of the year 1562, we see the pious duke Christo-
pher, with Brentius, Andrea, and other Lutheran theologians,
setting off for Zabern in Alsace. Francis de Guise, and his
brothers, the cardinal and the grand-prior, met them there. The
cardinal appeared with a pious, benevolent countenance before
the Germans : he wished it to be thought that he was a good
Lutheran, and that he would willingly have signed the Augs-
burg Confession at Poissy. We have seen however that when
Beza asked him to do so. he refused : now he declared that, as
he valued his souPs salvation, he agreed with them. This took
place on the 1 7th of February: but when it was believed that
the princes had been lulled to sleep, an infamous and sanguinary
scene was enacted on their return, at Vassy. The landgrave
Philip wrote on the occasion to his deeply- afflicted cousin, say-
ing, "It had often occurred that pious people were betrayed,
but God would still find a way for the exposure of the Guises."
This leads us to a review of the religious wars.
* MS. Bern, t Beza, p. 674. J MS. Bern, Calv. Sturmio, 25 Mart. 1562.
396 MASSACRE AT VASSY. [CHAP. XIII.
CHAPTER XIII.
FIRST RELIGIOUS WAR. — THE PEACE. 1562-1563.
While the queen was employing her whole influence with the
parliament to set all in motion, and thereby secure the publica-
tion of the edict of January, the duke of Guise arrived in Paris
with a number of men prepared for controversy : his wife, a
daughter of the duchess of Ferrara, accompanied him*. En-
raged for a long time against the inhabitants of Vassy, who were
Protestants, he sent thither his troops : it was the 1st of March.
The reformed, to the number of a thousand or twelve hundred,
were celebrating the Lord's Supper in a barn, with profound de-
votion. The duke sent word that they were not to disperse : he
then surrounded the place with soldiers. Just as the preacher
was beginning his sermon, the door was burst open ; the mur-
derers rushed, with horrid blasphemies, upon the unarmed mul-
titude, and struck down whomever they found. Twenty-two
persons were killed on the spot, and one hundred and sixteen
wounded, many of whom died of the injuries they received. All
were plundered ; and the preacher was murdered while uttering
the noble words of the psalmist, " Thou hast redeemed me, Thou
God of truth \" Guise himself was present with drawn sword:
he found a large bible and brought it to his brother, the cardinal,
who stood in the neighbouring church-yard. " Read/' said the
duke, " the title of these writings of the Huguenots." The cardi-
nal told him that the volume was the Holy Scriptures. " What,"
said the duke, confused, " has the Bible been written fifteen hun-
dred years, and was only printed a year ago ? Par la mart de
Dieu, tout n'en vaut Hen."
Beza immediately demanded of the queen that judicial pro-
ceedings should be instituted against the murderers; but the
duke of Guise laughed at the demand, and despised the orders
of the queen, who being more skilled in intrigue than in govern-
ment, was anxious to keep from offending either party. Guise
was received in Paris with every mark of honour and rejoicing :
the people shouted as he passed, " Long live the duke !" He was
proud of his triumph, and king Anton and the queen entered
into a strict confederacy with him. Beza stood exposed to the
* Beza, p. 722.
A.D. 1562-63.] COMMENCEMENT OF HOSTILITIES. 397
greatest danger, and was obliged to flee with all possible speed
to Orleans ; but it is easy to perceive by his letters how he, as
well as Calvin, in the midst of all the threats and horrors by
which the Protestants were assailed, still remained full of hope.
The fire was now kindled throughout the kingdom : the Guises
possessed themselves of the person of the king, and conveyed
him to the castle of Melun : " Vassy" was the watch-word for
massacre in many parts of the country, especially at Cahors,
Toulouse, Tours, Amiens, and Sens.
But the whole body of French Protestants now arose ; they
besought Conde to come to their aid, and to insist on the right-
ful observance of the January edict. At the beginning of April
this distinguished man took possession of the city of Orleans, and
applied on all sides for troops and money. Beza called a gene-
ral synod : it assembled, and letters were sent to all the congre-
gations of the reformed in France. This was the first time that
the synod of ministers acted in a political capacity; and this
moment also impressed the church itself with its peculiar cha-
racter. The reformed set themselves in motion, and seized se-
veral cities and churches, from which they banished the mass,
and images. Even Lyons was taken by them, but more through
the mild address of Viret than by the power of arms. Conde
made it known by a manifesto, that he was resolved to defend
the king and his edict by the sword. On the 11th of April he
wrote to the Genevese, requesting them to offer up public prayers
for him and for his cause : this was done through the whole
of the war.
The most eminent men of the reformed party now hastened
to Orleans, and bound themselves by an oath to oppose the
Guises. Conde persuaded the whole of the nobility to subscribe
an act of union, by which they pledged themselves to contend
for the honour of God and the freedom of the king, and to pu-
nish blasphemy and blasphemers: hence it was ordered that
the camp should always be attended by ministers.
During these proceedings Beza turned himself to the German
princes, and even to the emperor Ferdinand, to ask for their
cooperation.
From these turbulent scenes it is refreshing to direct our at-
tention to Calvin, who had just at this time received a letter from
Winterthur, where the aged Blaarer had, on the 4th of April,
celebrated his seventieth birthday, and was now earning on a
correspondence by letter with the reformer at Geneva. Calvin
398 CONDUCT OF BEZA. [CHAP. XIII.
spoke to him with piety and earnestness on the events of the
period, and praised Beza as an instrument employed by God,
in proclaiming his word to the people and to kings : he also
showed how great were the evils with which France was
threatened by the union of the Guises with some of the German
princes*.
Beza was now the soul of the whole encampment, and had to
employ his utmost efforts to restrain the passions of his party,
in which however he was not always successful. Thus the trea-
sury of St. Martin was plundered at Tours, and the tomb de-
stroyed f. But Beza acted throughout consistently with his
noble character, and was a preacher of peace in the midst of the
storms of war : he everywhere raised his powerful voice against
rapine and murder, and was often the deliverer of the Catholics.
At Angers he presented himself before the parliament, and as-
sured it that he and his party abhorred violence, and that it was
only committed by the rabble which followed in their track. To
his own associates he said, l( God will never be the protector of
robbers and murderers." Much bad conduct indeed must have
been exhibited, when it required the whole influence of Coligny
to prevent him from leaving the army altogether. He exhibited
his moderation in the fairest light, when, after the siege of Rouen,
his friend Marlorat and many others were murdered, and the
reformed proposed to retaliate in their camp on the opposite
party : he resisted this design with his whole power.
The general synod at Orleans opened its sittings on the 27th
of April, in the presence of the prince of Conde, the admiral
Chatillon, and several other men of distinction. Here too Cal-
vin's enemy, the exiled Bolsec, appeared : he played the peni-
tent, and promised to offer satisfaction to Bern and Geneva, but
it was only, as soon as the churches there were threatened with
danger, to return to his proper allies.
Calvin, deeply troubled at these warlike proceedings, said to
Bullingcr that grief and shame had prevented his writing to
him J. "The arrival of the English has greatly alarmed the
enemy, and the Scotch will soon join them : the queen is again
returned to the practice of her arts, and messengers have been
sent to treat of peace. It is to be lamented that the rage of the
parliament of Toulouse could not be bridled : it has slain by the
* Ed. Laus. Ep. 338. Ed. Amstel. p. 1C9.
t MS. Goth, to Carl Passelius, Schlosser, Leben Beza's, p. 165.
I June 9, Aug. 15, 1562. MS. Tur.
A.D. 1562-63.] PROCEEDINGS OF THE REFORMED. 399
hand of the executioner above three hundred rich and worthy
men, some of them nobles, and others the administrators of
public functions. If you have any influence with the Bernese
council, and can induce it to send troops to the support of the
princes, I beseech you to do all you can to this end ; for if the
war be protracted, we and the entire kingdom are lost. The
council of Geneva has borrowed 12,000 gold dollars to meet the
expenses of the war."
Conde had entered into an alliance with the elector palatine ;
but, at the same time, he proposed to the court to abide by the
edict of January, till a free council could be held ; and he promised
on these conditions to lay down his arms. But the triumvirate
rejected his advances, and were resolved to have only one reli-
gion in the state. Conde complained aloud against them, and
unmasked their plans. The religious war therefore now com-
menced in earnest. On the 3rd of July Conde prepared to give
battle ; but the enemy hesitated. The Guises spread a report
through Germany, that they intended to introduce the Augsburg
Confession into France ; that the king and the court only op-
posed the design ; and hence the assembly of so many troops
for their defence. Conde hereupon sent a short confession to
the German troops, and thus brought over a portion of them to
his side. When this was found to be the case, the Catholics im-
mediately sought the aid of the Spaniards and Italians.
In the midst of these events the plague broke out in Orleans,
and the parliament proclaimed the reformed rebels. They pro-
tested against this act. On the 12th of October the Protestant
army held a solemn day of penitence. About ten thousand per-
sons died in Orleans, and eighteen thousand in Paris, before the
pestilence ceased.
It may perhaps be asked, how could the reformed so sud-
denly commence this war, and that without any means of sup-
port ? We have seen that, according to the discipline of the
French reformed church, all the expenses of worship were to be
borne by its members, even to the costs of the journeys under-
taken by their ministers. That Calvin himself took great inten st
in these circumstances, appears from the fact, that he urged the
several congregations to provide the money necessary for certain
journeys, and that they obeyed his call*. Thus the churches
in Languedoc were expected to raise money to pay the levies
* This appears from a letter to the church at Poitiers, August 1, 155S.
MS. Gen.
400 SIEGE OF ROUEN. [CHAP. XIII.
for Andelot *. " God/5 he says, " again bowed us down ; but
when all was lost, He provided means, in a manner incompre-
hensible to us, for the uplifting of his church, as if awakening
it from the dead."
The emperor Ferdinand was now at Frankfort (1562), whither
he had gone for the purpose of holding a diet. Calvin seized the
opportunity, probably in conformity with Beza's advice, to send
him an excellent confession of the doctrines of the French re-
formed church. He hoped by these means to overcome the
slanderous falsehoods of the Guises ; and, as he relates, the way
to Frankfort being closed, he afterwards made this writing public.
It was in the same manner that, in the year 1535, one of his first
works, the c Institutions/ was written to support the faith of his
brethren in France ; and this, one of his last, was composed
with the same definite purpose, and the same consistency of doc-
trine, as the former f.
That they might not be without a representative, the reformed
had sent Jac. de Spifame to Frankfort : he was both a preacher
and a man of business, and acted so skilfully at the diet, that all
the intrigues of the Guises were discovered. Thus it was shown
that Conde had begun this war, which in the course of a few
months had cost the lives of 30,000 men, at the command of
Catherine, so that he stood justified before the assembly, and the
envoy was able to recommend the cause of France, by the most
pressing arguments, to the consideration of the German princes.
Guise however besieged Rouen, which was taken by storm,
and given up to the fury of the soldiers. The pillage continued
eight days, and, among many other sacrifices, fell the worthy
Marlorat. King Anton was wounded on the day when the city
was taken, and died of the injuries which he had received, be-
cause in the fever with which they were attended, he refused to
be separated from the sirens set around him by Catherine. This
woman now kept a fair face with all parties and with all vices.
It was now too late for Anton to turn his back on the Catholic
clergy ; but he ordered the book of Job to be read to him,
and commanded his son to remain true to the king : he died in
November. Conde was now the oldest prince of the house ; he
strove for his own personal interests, not for the church, which
he plunged deeper and deeper into the stream of political life.
During the year 1562 the war raged more fiercely than ever, but
no decided blow was struck. Coligny and Beza with difficulty
* MS. Gen. Sept. 30, 15G2. f Senebier, t. i. p. 233.
A.D. 15G2-63.] BATTLE OF DREUX. 401
prevented their allies from falling upon Paris, and exposing it to
pillage.
At length, December 19, 1562, after many marches, the two
stood opposite each other, near Dreux. Before the battle com-
menced, Beza preached a severe sermon against the covetousness,
the love of slaughter, and the enmity, which were apparent both
in the higher and lower ranks of the army. On the evening
before the battle Conde had a dream, which he communicated
to Coligny and Beza : he stated that he dreamt that he fought
three battles ; that in each, one of the triumvirs fell ; but that in
a fourth he himself was mortally wounded, and laid upon a fu-
neral pile. Coligny regarded the whole as mere imagination,
but Beza felt convinced that it was a presentiment of the battle
which was just about to be fought. On the following morning
the admiral led the troops to the first onset ; he fell victoriously
upon the enemy, and one of the generals, Montmorency, was
taken prisoner. But the Swiss Catholics, animated by their fa-
naticism, restored the day : Conde was wounded, and taken pri-
soner. This dispirited the troops ; but Coligny supplied the want
of the prince, and Beza, having animated the soldiers by a speech*
full of ardour, took his place in the foremost rank, as if he had
been a standard-bearer. Coligny, after performing many heroic
actions, drew off* the remainder of the troops in good order, and
retreated to Lyons. Among the slain on the opposite side was
the marshal St. Andre.
We cannot pass over without mention a singular circumstance
which occurred to Calvin at this timef. He was lying in bed
on the Saturday evening, December 19, sick of the ague: the
north wind, which rages violently at Geneva^ and over the lake,
had roared furiously for two days. Calvin uttered the remark-
able words : " I know not what may be betokened, but it seemed
to me last night as if I heard the blast of war-trumpets sounding
fiercely in the air. I could not convince myself that it was not
so. Let us pray, I beseech you ; for assuredly there is something
important going on." And on that very day the battle at Dreux
took place. The news of the event soon arrived. Calvin, who
felt a lively interest in all the occurrences of that year, wrote to
Bullinger, "that the battle was not actually lost ; that it was now
for him to share in the Maccabean Btruggle."
Conde remained a prisoner; true indeed to bis party, but more
* MS. Gen. Calv. Bullingero, Jan. 16, 1563.
t Be/a, in Calvin's Life.
VOL. II,
402 prince of conde. [chap. XIII
from hatred to the Guises than from regard to Beza's exhorta-
tions. Party fury was now at its height in France, and the
duchess Renata, writing to Calvin, expressed herself in these
melancholy words : " I am more afflicted than you can imagine,
at beholding how half the people in this kingdom conduct them-
selves : the most pitiable deceits and enmities everywhere pre-
vail. Such is the state of things, that little simple girls have
been led to say, that they are ready to kill and slay with their
own hands. This is not the rule which Christ and his apostles
have given us ; and I say it in the deepest distress of heart, be-
cause of the love which I bear for my faith, and for all who ad-
here to that which Christ has taught. I speak not of all, but of
those whom I know.55
After the battle at Dreux, the two parties were so enraged
against each other that they even carried on the war in the winter,
till the duke of Guise, at the siege of Orleans, was assassinated
by a fanatic of the reformed party, a young nobleman, Jean de
Merci, who also bore the name of Poltrot. Guise died of his
wounds on the sixteenth day (February 24, 1563) : shortly before
his death he spoke with sorrow of the cruelties perpetrated at
Vassy, entreated the queen to conclude a peace, and called those
who should oppose it enemies of the state.
Peace was now generally spoken of: Montmorency, though a
prisoner, resisted the idea ; but Conde, also a prisoner, favoured
it, for he loved the repose of a life at court : he was permitted to
go to Orleans on his parole. The reformed ministers, seventy-
two in number, held a meeting in that city ; they all expressed
their desire to have the edict of January established ; to receive
a promise of protection for their party ; and an assurance that
those who violated the guarantee should be punished. Conde
complained of the severity of the ministers, while the latter ac-
cused him of indolence, and of being slow to take advantage of
circumstances, which might secure the Reformation in France.
But the prince was under the influence of Catherine's courtly
dames. We have seen what Calvin said on this matter. The
queen now endeavoured, by means of Balduin, who advocated
indifference, to induce Conde to conclude a peace with the
Catholic party, and which should merely afford toleration to-the
reformed. Beza returned with the admiral to Orleans, in order
to strengthen Conde's faith in the evangelical doctrines; but the
latter prepared a treaty of peace, which received the immediate
assent of the queen (March 19, 1563), without Coligny's being
a.d. 1562-63.] calvix to conde. 403
consulted on the subject. This peace was concluded at Amboise.
The whole Protestant party was loud in the expression of its
disgust and resentment* ; but thus ended the first religious war.
Calvin did not live to witness the second. Respecting the peace,
he thus expressed himself to the prince of Conde t : " With re-
gard to the conditions, I know well enough that it was not easy
for you to obtain what you wished. If however you do not make
use of your authority, that which has been concluded in behalf
of the faithful will be like a body without a soul." He expressed
a wish that the ' Confession' which he had sent to Frankfort,
should be printed, so that the reformed faith might be made
generally known, and that an effectual obstacle might be raised
to the introduction of the Augsburg Confession into France.
" By this measure," he said to the prince, " you will shut the
door against all attempts to induce you to subscribe the Augs-
burg Confession." In conclusion, he commended Geneva to his
care, and prayed him to use his influence as a mediator, and to
effect a union with Switzerland. The Swiss had left the Gene-
vese to themselves. Calvin spoke of this to Bullinger, and with
eyes upraised to heaven : he again wrote to Conde respecting
the ' Confession ' ; and to Bullinger he says, " It must be pub-
lished with the signature of Conde, and of the other great per-
sonages. His word and reputation will thus bind him to us,
and he will draw over the German princes to our side."
Beza, having fulfilled his mission in France, hastened back to
Geneva, anxious to relieve Calvin of the vast load of occupations
which had been imposed upon him by his absence, and hoping
there to rest from his own toils in peace and friendship. Great
gratitude was expressed towards him in France, and the thanks
of the brethren were communicated to the council of Geneva;};.
That body showed itself favourably disposed to the common
cause, and shared in the general satisfaction. Thus it passed a
resolution to give the clergy and professors, from time to time,
a public entertainment, as is mentioned in the state-protocol §.
Calvin had the satisfaction to receive at this time a letter from
the duchess of Ferrara, in answer to his own, already quoted.
This was probably the most satisfactory period of his life. But
we may see, from the letter alluded to, how little freedom resulted
from the peace. The duchess had left Paris because a reformed
MS. Gen. to Bullinger, April 8, 1563. t MS. Gen. 10 Mai, 1563.
Registres, 7 Mai, 1503. ^ Registres, 5 Mars. L563.
•J !) 2
404 THE DUCHESS OF FERRARA. [CHAP. XIII.
minister was forbidden to preach in her house, even though it
was situated in a village. She answered Calvin's exhortations
with humility and respect, assuring him that she would follow
his counsel, and not appear again in the consistory, although the
queen of Navarre, the wife of the admiral, and the lady de Roye,
did not fear being present. She thanked him for the gold medal
which he had sent her, adding the remarkable words, important
even to the present day, " I had never before seen such a one ;
and I have thanked God that the king, my father, chose the
motto which it bears [Destruam Babylonem). Though God may
not have given him the grace to fulfil the idea thus expressed,
yet he may perhaps accomplish it by those who shall succeed to
his place."
A few months before Calvin's death she complained to him,
with the feelings of a mother, respecting the duchess of Guise,
her eldest daughter, who supported the Catholics : — " I do not
wish to distress you, but I am compelled to pour out my heart
to you with the sorrow which is common to all the children of
God. You know what the enemies of the truth design. The
treaty of the pope with the king of Spain, with Venice, and the
other Italian powers, among which is our neighbour — these
imagine that they can root Christianity entirely out of the world ;
and the duchess of Guise resigns herself to a course which can
only lead to ruin. Thankful should I be if she could be led by
your influence to bridle her passions."
Calvin saw clearly the storm which impended over France, and
to which the duchess alluded. He himself spoke more than once
of the condition of the country, and urged the men who had
power and influence to fulfil their duty*. "With regard," he
said, " to the state of France, I see it so pressed on all sides with
difficulties, that I almost fear everything must be begun anew ;
not that it would not be easy to find speedy means to improve its
condition, if people had the goodwill to seek them ; but you see
to what a state we are come. I have written to the prince of
Conde, but not in the style which you wished me to adopt, for
it is very contrary to my nature to make him believe that white
is black. I have also prayed the admiral to act more firmly in
some respects; not as if it were absolutely necessary to urge
him forward, but because he desired me to speak thus freely
with him."
Calvin always stood in close relation to Coligny, who regarded
* MS. Gen. 8 xMai, 15(33.
a.d. 15G2-63.] calvin's political influence. 405
him as the head of the party, and carefully acquainted him there-
fore with whatever took place. Calvin says to Bullinger*, " I
yesterday received letters, in which Coligny informs me, that he
will send me and Beza a man as soon as possible who shall in-
form us of his plans. The admiral himself declares that he is
prepared for the first attack."
Looking with a prophetic glance into the future, Calvin beheld
the signs of a fearful storm, just ready to break outt* A few
months before his end, and while the League was in process of
formation, he received intelligence from Bullinger that the cardi-
nal of Lorraine had effected an alliance between the papal powers.
But notwithstanding this, never had the affairs of the Protestants
been in a more prosperous condition. The admiral Coligny,
summoned to Paris, had entered the capital with a retinue of five
hundred horsemen, and was graciously received by the queen.
In Germany, affairs after Calvin's death wore a worse appear-
ance than in France. A new conference was held at Mumpel-
gart between Beza, Fay, and Jac. Andrea, but it only afforded
another proof of the unchristian spirit which was rapidly spread-
ing through the whole Lutheran church. Westphal, Hesshus,
Brentius, Flacius and Jac. Andrea were still the chief disputants ;
it was therefore no wonder that the Lutheran church continued
to decline, as to its inner life, whilst the reformed church arose,
in spite of all the pressure from without.
Calvin continued, though on a bed of sickness, to guide the
churches with the spirit of a true reformer. Five months before
his death he preached to the community of Chambery, formed
as it had been among papists, on Christian decision, of which his
whole life had been an example. "Build not," he said, "upon
the sand : summon together all the force and resolution of which
you are possessed, that you may be able to overcome all the ob-
stacles which the servants of the devil cast in your way. Re-
member this, that it is not permitted you to serve both parties."
The share which Calvin took in these events obliges us to
speak more particularly of his political inllucnce.
Calvin has been accused, even up to the present times, of
having caused all those civil wars which afflicted the period to
which we are alluding. Roman Catholic historians, careless and
uncritical, have laid this down as an axiom, and a host of pam-
phleteers have followed in their train. Catholics, like Bossuet,
* MS. (ion. Jul. 29, 1563. | MS. Tur. Calv. Stanis. Sarnicio.
406 calvin's theocracy. [chap. xiti.
pretend that he was involved in the conspiracy of Amboise ; and
this is repeated with the greatest rashness by all the ill-in-
structed minds of the party, to which truth is of little import.
And further : Calvin, they say, laid the foundation-stone of the
republic, without considering that the Gospel renews, but does
not revolutionize. Even a protestant, in modern times, with more
respect indeed, but with as much obscurity, has repeated the
accusation. " That noble precept, f The weapons of our warfare
are spiritual,' vanishes by degrees from the standard of a religion
which could not continue a religion or a church, but which sought
to found a state." Thus the Protestants, it is insinuated, hoped
to accomplish great things by means of a pretended impartiality,
while the Catholics, on their side, resisted them with their wonted
obstinacy.
The imperfect views of these writers may be traced to the
errors which they commit in regard to Calvin's theocratic spirit.
To many indeed the idea of a pure Christian theocracy is alto-
gether strange. Calvin contended for the government of God,
not for the government of the people. His political notions
were framed in the spirit of the old prophets, but his designs
were perpetually involved with civil affairs, through the inter-
ference of the council : it is not wonderful therefore that he
should have been anxious to promote an alliance between France
and Switzerland. The notion, that Protestantism sought the
formation of a state, and not a church, is opposed both to reason
and the Gospel. History shows, on the contrary, that it was in
France only that the Protestant party acquired, through par-
ticular circumstances, a political character. The Guises trod
both church and state under foot, and the temporal power was
compelled, for its own security, to put weapons into the hands
of the Protestants. It is false to assert that Calvin desired a
republican form of government. The church-polity which he
adopted was the polity of the primitive church. Where intro-
duced into Germany, there it has continued without creating
change or agitation. The German territories, in which the
reformed system has prevailed, have never been more inclined
than the Lutheran to revolution. The Protestant communities
indeed have generally been opposed to change. Their religion
renders them susceptible to reform, while Roman Catholic coun-
tries are necessarily exposed to a series of convulsions which
must eventually lead to the downfall of the papacy, opposing
itself as it does in its unyielding grossness to every species of
A.D. 1562-63.] CALVIN ON GOVERNMENT. 407
improvement. Calvin's enemies ought, in common justice, to
have listened to the enunciation of his principles, and to the
expressions which he so distinctly uttered, proving as they do,
that from the beginning to the end of his career he protested
against every kind of warlike movement.
The reformers especially recognized the rights of the temporal
power against the principle of the papacy. The state, with them,
is a necessary moral institution*. Calvin however wished the
church to have an existence proper to itself — an independent
power; hence he subjected the state to the church, as the church
to the state, which naturally introduces a theocracy. Each
separate community forms a little republic, and from the whole
springs a nobler and higher unity. But according to Calvin,
every species of government was reconcileable with Christianity,
even despotism. Where, however, representatives of the people
exist, populates magistratus, it is their duty, if the people be op-
pressed, to resist any act of arbitrary power. Hence, under cer-
tain circumstances, Calvin could justify in France a rising against
tyranny : he preferred the republican form only as it existed in
ancient Israel, where the government was carried on in the name
of God, not in the name of the people. The sovereignty of the
people was altogether a novel idea to his mind : no particular
form of government had, with him, a decided preference ; each
had its defects. He would have no war. In this he agreed with
Luther ; but the German reformer thought that if the elector of
Saxony was attacked by those who persecuted his subjects, it
would be the duty of that prince to defend his people by force
of arms. Supposing however that some mistook the spirit of
Calvin, and from the synodal form of church government in
France, took occasion, in the struggle against Rome, to uphold
republican principles ; or that Henry IV. established a reformed
state within a state, thus committing a great political error, Cal-
vin was not answerable for the misuse which was thereby made
of his doctrine. He observed to Sadolct, and to the count Tar-
nowsky, iC that if the Christian religion gave occasion to disturb-
ances, this must be attributed to applications of the system, not
agreeable to the truth."
But Calvin has not been wanting of supporters. Thus, for
example, the excellent Basnage readily undertook to prove that
the conspiracy of Amboisc was a political stratagem, which had
no connection with the church. "The Catholics/' said Mezerav,
• See the [nstitutes, t. iv. c. 20. >. !, 26 31.
408 THE GUISES OPPOSED. [CHAP. XIII.
'• feared for the freedom of the state/5 It was not the reformed
who, as Bossuet wished to represent, were seeking to revenge
their persecutions. This writer heaps falsehood upon falsehood,
and sees not that it ill becomes one who delighted in violence to
find fault with the reformers for venturing to defend themselves,
as if, like an executioner appointed by the church, he had a right
to their blood. But here is the truth. The plan of the conspi-
rators, of whom the queen herself was the life, was laid with the
design of securing the duke of Guise, and bringing him under
the operation of the law. According to Basnage, the divines
and jurists were desired to give their opinion, as to whether it
were allowable to make a minister of state prisoner before his
trial. No crime was committed in this case. All that was done
was in obedience to the command of the queen, who was anxious
tojfree herself from the tyranny of the Guises.
Bossuet adduces against Calvin one of his unpublished letters.
The latter satisfied himself herein with simply condemning the
violent proceedings of the baron von Adrets, who destroyed a
number of images without any authority to do so : Calvin passed
no censure on the war itself: but this letter in fact speaks greatly
in his favour. The war carried on in France against the Guises,
with the aid of legitimate authority, was a species of holy war.
Calvin distinctly called the proceedings of Adrets, " a horrible
scandal, calculated to bring disgrace on the Gospel;5' and ex-
pressed a wish that whatever had been taken in the way of rob-
bery should be restored. Numberless expressions indeed might
be quoted, in which Calvin decidedly condemns the waging of
war on account of the Gospel*.
With regard to the conspiracy of Amboise, Calvin expressed
his disapprobation of the design as soon as it was communicated
to him, and with such force, that he hoped he had prevented its
execution. Applied to a second time, he still as resolutely de-
clared his aversion to the plans of the conspirators. When how-
ever he was asked a third time, he assembled his colleagues and
protested openly against the undertaking ; and on finding that
the parties concerned were resolved to proceed, he complained
that his influence and advice were wholly neglected. He even
preached against what was being done, and exclaimed, " Better
were it a thousand times that we all perished, than that we should
bring such infamy upon the name of Christians and the Gospel/5
* MS. Paris, 16 Avril, 1561. He speaks in a similar manner in a letter to
Bullinger, Mai 11, 1560. Ed. Laus. Ep. 2Q3. Ed. Amstel. p. 142.
A.D. 1562-63.] CONSPIRACY OF AMBOISE. 409
Beza, who was so rashly accused in the affair of Poltrot, was
equally free from any guilt in this proceeding : he declared in
the strongest manner, "that he never knew Poltrot; that he
had had no intercourse with him, either directly or indirectly ;
nay, that he had never heard mention of the plan referred to."
So also he said, that " when he prayed that Francis de Guise
might be converted, or that the land might be freed from such
an enemy, he had only done what the prophets and first Chris-
tians had done under similar circumstances, — e When wilt thou
avenge the blood of the righteous ?' "
The admiral Coligny was accused by the same party, the
advocates of St. Bartholomew's night, as a wretch who had heard
of Poltrot's design to murder the duke, and had taken no means
to prevent it. But Coligny declared publicly, that he had warned
the duchess of her husband's danger, — a service which would
never have been rendered him on the part of the Guises*.
Calvin's oft-repeated sentiments show clearly how earnestly
he endeavoured to calm the excited feelings of his associates.
Thus he declared to them, that " if they wished to establish their
rights by the sword, they would prevent God from helping them."
— " One single drop of blood shed by you will overflow all
France." He forbad their taking possession of the churches ;
and said, " that he should be not less indignant than the king
against those who employed violence." In two of his letters to
Soubize, the leader in the movement, he directed him to lay
clown his arms, as the king desired ; and to submit himself to
the legitimate authority of the state. He regarded it as some-
thing especially monstrous for a minister of religion to bear arms :
" It is their duty to believe that the church will be extended by
other and extraordinary means." He included the duke of
Guise in the number of those for whom he prayed. It was not
his fault that he could not, in that confused war of passions, bridle
the spirit of political parties. Beza remained in Coligny's camp
to lessen, as far as possible, the miseries occasioned by the strife,
and Calvin addressed the troops in words of the mightiest im-
port. Thus, notwithstanding the accusation of hostile polemics,
there still remains inscribed on the standard which he raised, the
apostolic motto, " The weapons of our warfare are not carnal,
but spiritual."
* Beza, I list. Ecclcs. 1. vi. p. 297.
410 FRANCIS BALDUIN. [CHAP. XIV.
CHAPTER XIV.
CONTROVERSIES. THE FALSE REPORTS
PUBLISHED BY HIS ENEMIES. STRUGGLE AGAINST
BALDUIN.
Having thus considered Calvin in his relation to France, and
the important events of which it was the scene, we have now
again, and in the concluding period of his career, to view him as
a polemic. It was in fact the lot of this reformer, and of others
like him, to have to contend with all the dark spirits of the age
in which they lived. The last years of Calvin's life, as was the
case with Melancthon, were troubled by a host of wranglers and
calumniators, among whom Balduin, the jurist, might be re-
garded as the most hateful.
Calvin, after the death of his wife, when visited, as he so fre-
quently was, by severe attacks of illness, assembled around his
sick bed a number of young men, to whom he dictated his let-
ters and his works. Among these youpg men there was one in
whose conversation he greatly delighted, and whom he invited
to his table, carefully instructing him, and allowing him the free
use of his library, where his papers and manuscripts lay exposed.
This was Francis Balduin, a native of Arras, and subsequently
celebrated as a jurist at Heidelberg. It is gratifying to see how
free from suspicion this great man was ; how open he stood to
the world, with nothing that he wished to hide ; and how little
he doubted men's honesty, though he had been so often em-
ployed in unmasking deceit and wickedness. Balduin however
spoke of a journey to France, and at once disappeared : he took
with him several of Calvin's papers, all of which he appears to
have diligently perused, having possessed himself of those which
he could employ most effectually in attacking the reformer.
There were among them the letters from Bucer, in which he
attacked Calvin with the strongest expressions of censure and
reproof.
Balduin stood by the side of the cardinal at Poissy, when he
planned the union which was to be the source of so many con-
flicts. He was sometimes a protestant ; sometimes a papist.
Cassander had printed a letter at Basel to promote his object.
Calvin immediately ascribed it to Balduin, and at once wrote to
A.D. 1562-63.] CONTROVERSY WITH BALDUIN. 411
Beza, then at St. Germain, on the subject. Now began the
strife. Calvin, in his preface to the Psalms, compared his case
with that of David, who was also continually surrounded by ene-
mies. But very different to Melancthon, he knew how to make
his opponents sensible of his greatness and unyielding fortitude.
In this controversy the zeal of the reformer, advanced as he
was in years, exhibited itself in all its strength ; and many of
his friends were of opinion that he, as well as Beza, ought to have
reflected on the mildness proper to those who are saved. But it
must be observed, that in the present instance, Calvin's personal
feelings were concerned, and that they were excited to the highest
degree by the treacherous ingratitude of the man towards whom
he had behaved with so much unsuspecting kindness. Balduin
moreover, although a skilful lawyer, proved himself, by the lax
character of his plans of union, but an indifferent christian.
This must have tended to increase the fervent zeal of both re-
formers, and it is impossible not to allow that they were in the
right. Hence we also see why Senebier in his time, and Bayle,
who looked down upon all religions, and Niceron, a catholic,
passed no severe judgement upon Balduin. But both the last
confessed that he must have been an extraordinarily unsettled
man, for that he had changed his faith and his confession seven
times. His conduct towards Calvin, which certainly merited
severe punishment, they did not name.
The circumstance which gave occasion to the controversy with
Calvin has been already stated. King Anton conferred with
Balduin, and sent him back to Germany to form plans with Cas-
sander. The ministers had already spoken twice at Poissy, in
public debate, when Balduin appeared there with a copy of Cas-
sander's project of union, as printed at Basel. Some discontent
was expressed that he came so late. He now went to Paris,
where he delivered his lectures; but he had lost much of his
reputation through engaging in the late affair. Calvin, in his
work against Cassander, without mentioning his name, alludes
to Balduin as his guest, his former help and servant, and calls
him a betrayer. This roused the anger of Balduin to the highest
pitch, and gave him the long-wishcd-for opportunity of distin-
guishing himself in his church. Passing all bounds of modera-
tion, he loaded his adversary with abuse, ami proved himself to
be neither Lutheran nor Calvinist, but simply a papist. Calvin,
very embittered at finding himself so treated by a man whom he
412 REPLY TO CASSANDER. [CHAP. XIV.
had brought up, soon proved to him that the ardour of youth
was not yet extinguished in his spirit.
Some farther light is thrown on the cause of Calvin's anger by
the report, that Balduin had been twice in Geneva before he
was called to Bourges, and that he renewed his friendship with
Calvin when no longer a youth. During the seven years that
he dwelt at Bourges (1549-56) he professed outwardly the Ca-
tholic religion ; but he carried on a close correspondence with
Calvin, and assured him that he was inwardly a good protestant.
If the statement therefore referred to be true, Calvin may have
still cherished the hope that he would sooner or later return to
the reformed church. But he must have come a third time to
Geneva, on which occasion Calvin appears to have reproached
him bitterly for his dissimulation in religion, and to have refused
to forgive him till he exhibited sincere repentance. It may be
mentioned, as a striking proof of his vacillating conduct, that
after engaging in such a controversy with Calvin, he appeared
in 1566 in the first assembly held by the malcontents in Breda,
and drew up the paper in which they petitioned the duchess of
Parma to admit the free exercise of the Protestant religion in
her territories. He was a man in fact of all colours, while Cas-
sander, on the contrary, appears to have been a genuine lover
of peace. George Wicelius, who acted throughout his life in a
similar manner, practised the same sort of vacillation in Ger-
many.
Calvin assailed Cassander's writing in his well-known original
style, sharp, caustic, and powerful*. It shows how impossible
it is to unite both churches in their principles ; for example, in
the doctrines of scripture and tradition, a point which Cassander
would leave for tradition to decide. Catholic tradition, as the
unwritten truth, will alone suffice to allay religious strife. He-
resies, says Cassander, were silenced from the first, not by the
word of scripture, but by the right understanding thereof. Cal-
vin, on the other hand, observes, " According to this, the God-
head of Christ rests on no other basis than the decree of a
council." " And if," he justly adds, " we value the tradition or
the interpretations of the first century as highly as the Bible, the
main pillar of the faith is shattered ; for original sin, justification,
* Calvin's paper against Balduin appeared at Geneva under the title of
' Io. Calvini Responsio ad versipellem quendam Mediatorem,' &c. &t\ ; and
in French, ' Response a un certain moyenneur ruse,' &c. &c.
A.D. 1562-63.] REPLY TO CASSANDER. 413
and the sufficiency of the sacrifice of Christ, are treated of but
very obscurely in the writings of the oldest fathers. If there be
a written and an unwritten word, by what signs shall we deter-
mine the truth of the latter, so as to distinguish it from what is
false ? The high antiquity of a tradition is no certain proof of
its truth : otherwise we should be obliged to adopt all the hor-
rible heresies which arose in the apostolic times. The clear
light of the Gospel shines resplendent above all this dai'kness
and confusion. A second characteristic of tradition consists in
its universal reception ; but by universal, the writer referred to
means only the Roman Catholic church of the West."
On the one side indeed Cassander advocated the pure institu-
tion of Christ ; for example, in regard to the sacrament ; but on
the other, he justified the use of the ceremonies which had been
invented by the successors of the apostles. Thus a door was
opened to all that was Romanistic. Calvin now assailed the un-
christian character of the papacy itself, in which Cassander had
sought the true church. Calvin acknowledged indeed that there
were some remains of the true church in that of Rome ; but he
adds a review of the papacy, which proves the impossibility of a
union between it and the Protestant churches.
The main obstacle however to such a union was the doctrine
of justification : on this Calvin expresses himself as follows : —
" The Catholics pronounce with great severity the condemnation
of Arius, Sabellius, Nestorius, Eutyches, Marcion, and the Ma-
nichees. There is concord therefore among us, if it depend only
on the doctrine of the divine and human nature, and their union.
But when Paul teaches, that the church is established on Christ
alone, he means thereby, that Christ is made unto us of the Fa-
ther, wisdom, redemption, righteousness and sanctification. But
has not Cassander rejected the wisdom here spoken of, when,
like another Mahomet, he sets himself in its place, plays the Lord,
and mars by his inventions the brightness of the Gospel ? Let
it be observed however that this reformer united with the doc-
trine of free-will, that of redemption as taught by Paul ; and
what is still more, that he spoke of good works as opposed to
the righteousness which we receive through Christ. If, more-
over, we must seek our holiness in Christ, as the result of a
working-together of the human will with the grace of the Holy
Spirit, which only comes to our aid, — if we look at the means, or
the form of this grace, the whole theory must fall to the ground,
if Christ be not our sole high-priest, our Mediator; and if we do
414 REPLY TO CASSANDER. [CHAP. XIV.
not view the death of the Lord as our only and eternal offering
to God."
Calvin speaks in a very christian spirit of the communion,
which the reformed would so willingly have established with the
Catholics ; and this is important, as confuting the statements of
those who impute to Calvin, especially in this controversy, so
much gall and hatred. Of this I can find no trace in his works,
with the exception of an occasional remark, expressed in the
sarcastic tone common to his age. " With regard to the men
themselves," he said, " we are not personally opposed to them ;
for we desire their salvation equally with our own. We do not
indeed associate with the Catholics ; but I ask, do we view them
as swine, or dogs, because we avoid them ? On the contrary,
we truly pity their blindness, and would, as far as in us lies, put
an end to their vices. We love them with christian goodwill :
readily should we accept, yea, we are very anxious to receive
them, if they will but join us in worshipping God with purity of
heart. In short, we are prepared to make the first advances,
and by all means to unite ourselves to them ; but we would not
that they should separate us from Christ; nor would we par-
take of their superstition, which would only harden and pollute
us, and involve us in a common ruin and condemnation. — How
irrational is the plan of union proposed ! True religion is sup-
posed to lie between us and the papists : both parties have their
errors ; so that in one respect both must be destroyed, and then
the fragments must be sown together to form a new and a pure
church."
Calvin had written this work, sorrowfully, in the absence of
Beza, and while at the same time he had been deprived by death
of the agreeable society of his young friend Varenius. He sent
it to Beza, having before forwarded to him an abstract of its con-
tents, that he might know what course to pursue. Balduin de-
fended himself in a work for which he had obtained a privilegium
in the year 1557, and which he now published, corrected, and
with the addition of an appendix. This was soon followed by
Calvin's rejoinder ; in which, as he himself confesses, he came
forth with a feeling of indignation. When Balduin again quickly
answered him, Calvin briefly replied, that he would pursue the
matter no further, for that his friend Beza would now take his
place in the controversy. This declaration forms the introduc-
tion to Beza's answer, to which also Balduin still replied, deter-
mined to have the last word.
A. D. 1562-63.] CONTROVERSY WITH BALDUIN. 415
It is difficult to understand how Senebier and others could
find fault with Calvin for his reply to Balduin, whose violence,
unreasonable complaints, and abusive language, so richly de-
served the treatment which they received. Calvin's work more-
over is not uninteresting as illustrative of his character; resign-
ing himself as he did, and according to his usual custom, so
entirely to his present feeling. There is no mention indeed of
doctrine in the answer; it is wholly personal. We quote the
two following passages*: — "I allow that I am full of indigna-
tion. We remember the celebrated answer which Socrates gave
to those who persuaded him to bring some people who abused
him to trial. ' If an ass should kick at me/ he said, { would you
have me summon him before a court of justice?' Although I
am very far from possessing such magnanimity as Socrates, yet
long custom has hardened me against the barking of such dogs,
and I have learnt in a better school, that God, in order to prove
the patience of his servants, allows them to be assailed by slander
and abuse. — True it is, that I am not elevated by the greatness
of the revelations granted me, as if I were a Paul ; still I acknow-
ledge that I have this in common with the apostle, that a mes-
senger of Satan has been sent by God to buffet me in the face,
and that I am thus taught to humble myself. But as we must
at all times pray to God to drive back the devil and his angels,
it is our duty to oppose their revilings, lest the truth should be
injured by the falsehoods which they thus promulgate."
The reformers were so situated, that they could not avoid re-
plying to the foolish and wicked slanders with which they were
assailed. If they had taken no notice of the barkings and lies
of their enemies, they would have been regarded by the people as
guilty. But it was for the people that they lived and laboured,
and they were compelled therefore to adopt the rude language
which the people could best understand. Calvin was sufficiently
severe in his first reply to Cassander ; but he was far more so
in the second to Balduin. He is, in fact, throughout more vehe-
ment and passionate than in his earlier works. Fur example : —
" Not only ought a brand and a sign to be set upon Balduin, to
mark him as a slave, but he ought to be hung upon a gallows ; for
why should such a vile fellow be allowed to lift up his head from
the dunghill, and darken the light of the sun with his wicked
audacity ? "
Referring to Servetus, Calvin says : " He tells a wretched false-
* Opusc. p. 2215. Ed. Amstel. viii. p. 31(3.
416 CONTROVERSY WITH BALDU1N. [CHAP. XIV.
hood when he asserts, that I keep all others in bondage, and
make them dependent on my will. Now I desire no other wit-
nesses than those, who differing from me in opinion, yet con-
tinue to be my friends : but what follows is still more detestable.
If any one opposes my plans, it is said, he is not only deprived
of his rights, but loses his life. Such is the penalty of displea-
sing me. Castellio perhaps has requested him, as a mark of
friendship, to defend the cause of Servetus. True it is that that
unhappy man received the punishment due to his offences ; but
did this happen merely according to my will and pleasure ? It
is certain that his arrogance, no less than his impiety, was the
cause of his ruin and death. But what of wrong did I commit,
when the council of this city, encouraged indeed by me, but ac-
cording to the decision of various churches, took just revenge of
the horrible blasphemies of that wicked man ? Melancthon ap-
proved of the proceeding, and commended the severity of the
republic to imitation." The respect entertained for Melancthon
was sufficient to silence all objections.
« It is surely not necessary to blind France in order to con-
vince it of my faithfulness, my diligence, my honesty, discretion,
patience, and daily labours for the church ; things which have
been evidenced from my youth by so many testimonies/' — " This
man accuses me of having called myself Lucanius in my letters,
and out of this name he frames that of Lucianus, that he may
abuse me as an enemy of the true God."—" Among other things
laid to my charge is this, that I have no children. I answer,
that the Lord did give me a child, but was pleased to deprive
me of it. But thousands of children, in all parts of Christendom,
have been given me in its place." In the conclusion, Calvin
says of himself: " If I had Balduin's ambition, I could easily
gain the honours after which he has so long and so vainly sought ;
but I willingly resign such things. Satisfied with my humble
condition, I have ever delighted in a life of poverty, and am a
burden to no one : I remain contented with the office which the
Lord has given me. So far am I from seeking an increase of
stipend, that I have given up a portion of that allowed me. I
not only employ my best ability, my labour and study, to do
good to the church to which I am more especially devoted ; but
I also endeavour, by every means in my power, to benefit all
other churches : and so do I fulfil the duties of a teacher, that
no one can discover in my earnest truth and diligence any trace
of ambition. I bear with many annoyances ; but I suffer neither
A. D. 1562-63.] CONTROVERSY WITH BALDUIN. 117
the great nor the powerful to abridge my freedom of speech.
Thus I give not the reins to the great by flattering them ; nor
fear I the displeasure of either one party or the other. Up to
this hour, successful as I have been, I am free from pride ; and
though I have been assailed by many a storm and tempest, my
courage and fortitude have never failed me, till God, by his espe-
cial goodness, has come to my deliverance. I live at peace with
my associates, and endeavour with all sincerity to keep up the
friendship which exists among us."
This public witness which the reformer gave of himself, in
the place where he lived, before the eyes of all, and to the very
end of his career, is well-deserving of attention. Such however
was Balduin's confirmed hatred of Calvin, that he is reported to
have said, " that he would rather live with Beza in hell than
with Calvin in heaven." The mere presence of Calvin was a
hell to him.
Some little polemical tracts have also to be mentioned as be-
longing to this period. The i Congratulation to Gabriel de Sa-
conay5 is a very original paper, written against a priest of Lyons,
who, although himself immoral, wished to defend good morals
against the reformers, and therefore attacked the Genevese.
Calvin draws a very comical and grotesque picture of this man,
in the middle-age style, and makes him appear ridiculous from
beginning to end. The writing has some worth, as affording a
specimen of the wit and humour of the reformer. Saconay had
reprinted a part of Henry the Eighth's work against Luther,
with a very absurd preface of his own*. The work, which Cal-
vin believed was written by a priest, but published by the wish
of the king, under his name, had long been forgotten, and Saco-
nay, a catholic priest of bad character, only employed it as a
medium for accusing Calvin of intolerance, and Beza of sen-
suality.
Calvin took occasion from this circumstance to explain what
ought to be understood by the word heresy : he shows that the
determination of all questions must depend upon Scripture, and
states the difference between the Romish and Reformed churches.
From a critical examination of the papacy he passes to that of
the doctrine of the sacrament, and confutes the several errors of
the Catholics one by one.
This writing however contains much which is merely personal ;
* "II a cuyde estre demi-roy, si son noni estoit niosk' a un noin royal,"
said Calvin.
VOL. IT. 2 E
418 POLEMICAL TRACTS. [CHAP. XIV.
for example, the answer to the accusation that Calvin would not
suffer Luther's works to be printed at Geneva : but he shows
that he thoroughly agreed with the German reformer, who, in
treating of the unity of the church, prophesied the fall of the
papacy*.
Another equally characteristic production, written in French,
deserves also to be mentioned : it is an answer to Cathelin, for-
merly a Franciscan friar of Alby, who wrote fiercely against
Calvin. The introduction is curious : — " So many foolish beasts
are so detestably busy just now with paper and print, that re-
spectable men of learning will be ashamed to have anything to
do with printing/' Cathelin surpassed all the rest in his rage
against the reformed : he prayed the syndics to compel Calvin
to clear himself. The latter added, that the papacy could not
injure itself more than by countenancing such writers f.
A third work of a similar kind is supposed to have been writ-
ten against a libertine from Holland : Ziegenbein quotes it by
the title of 'Jean Calvin, de la vraye et fausse religion.' It is
not found however either in the Latin edition of his works, or in
the French ' Opuscules,' and was probably written by Viret J.
* " Si tu t'enquerrois du pape, il te diroit que son royaume estant pourri
corame de longue phthisie, est ainsi qu'une charogne qui n'a que le souffle. Je
t'annonce que ce que tu crains le plus t'arrivera en bref, c'est que ta cuisine
gelera; j'ai voulu achever mon propos par cette conjuration, parceque tu es
de cette sorte de diable que Ton ne chasse que par le jeune." — Opus. p. 2128.
f Calvin says that this man came accompanied by a woman to Geneva, and
was at first well-received : — " Puis ils ne purent tenir de diablier dans l'hostel-
lerieet se prendre au poil pour essayer qui seroit le plus fort — et par leur pro-
pre bouche furent convaincus d'etre un rumen et une puta'me." Calvin adds,
that, " with regard to his preface, he understood only the high German, as
they say" (that is, not at all). " It attacks the Reformation,— demands why 1
forbid giving alms to the papists,— asserts that I teach, that to vow chastity is
to tempt God." Calvin makes some pointed remarks on the following sub-
jects .—Vows, Auricular Confession, Absolution, Baptism, Regeneration, the
Sacrament of the Eucharist, and thus concludes :— " If this rogue continues
to annoy me with his babble, I shall easily learn to despise him, as I do so
many others, a thousand times more formidable than he ; for it is not my
office to silence all the dogs that bark in the world."
\ Senebier, Hist. Lit. de Geneve, i. p. 518.
A.D. 1563-64.] DISCIPLINE AT GENEVA. 119
CHAPTER XV.
CALVIN TAKES LEAVE OF THE WORLD. — REVIEW OF THE
CLOSE OF HIS LIFE. HIS OUTWARD CIRCUMSTANCES AND
INWARD STATE. HIS LAST LABOURS. FAREWELL AD-
DRESS TO THE MINISTERS, AND TO THE COUNCIL. GENE-
Calvin had frequently been on the point of leaving Geneva;
but he felt himself to the last supported by the hand of God, as
he was at the beginning, when Farel threatened him with the
curse of God if he forsook Geneva, and when he listened to his
words as to a distant storm. Among all the tempests however
to which he stood exposed, he had ever the feeling that a great
blessing was with him : he saw how magnificently his work pros-
pered in France, and in the year 1560 he found his system of
discipline adopted in the Palatinate. His Answer to Caspar
Olevianus is well-known. The law in Geneva was administered
with Roman strictness.
In the year 1563, a man named Villard, who had made
mockery of a .storm of thunder and lightning, while other people
were praying in terror, and who had sinned in other respects
against good morals, was seen led through the streets of Geneva,
and afterwards whipped, by the public executioner. In the same
year a book was thrown into the fire, amid a great concourse of
people : this was the c Discipline Ecclesiastique de Morelli de
Villiers,' in which it was asserted, that the consistory was an
institution of which nothing was known in the time of the
apostles, and that the people alone had the right to judge of
doctrine and morals. The synod of Orleans had condemned the
book in 1562. Calvin conducted the process at Geneva, as is
evident from the acts and remarks written in his own hand.
The author was not allowed to partake of the Lord's Supper
with the Genevese till he had confessed his error: he stood be-
fore the tribunal, August 26th, having promised to submit him-
self to the judgement of Calvin, Farel, and Viret. Calvin how-
ever declared very decidedly, that he would not place himself
above the opinion of the synod. Certain questions were put to
the author; but he refused to answer, except in writing. As no
420 PUBLIC AFFAIRS. [CHAP. XV.
further reply was received from him, he was pronounced schis-
matic, excommunicated, and given over to the council; but he
fled, and his wife pleaded his excuse. Such was the severe dis-
cipline, as shown by many examples, established at this period
in Geneva.
Public affairs wore a very troubled appearance. Geneva was
ao-ain (1563) threatened by Savoy*: all the representations
made by the little republic to the Bernese were without avail.
They had entered into a treaty of peace with Savoy. Thus Ge-
neva at the end of the year was in danger, even during the cele-
bration of the Christmas festival, and when all the people were
assembled in the churches to partake of the Lord's Supper, ot
beino- attacked by the enemy. The city, visibly defended only by
a wretched wall, was more than once surrounded and fortified,
through the prayer of the faithful, by a wall of fire. Pius n .
closed this year the Council of Trent; and the cardinal of Lor-
raine there established, as before related, an alliance between the
several Catholic powers of the South against the Gospel. We
see Calvin shortly before his death resisting this confederacy
with almost incredible energy : he adjured Bullinger, and all the
brethren, in the name of God, to exert themselves to secure the
renewal of the treaty between France and the Swiss, now coming
to a close, that the Gospel might enjoy protection, peace, and a
free course "f*. •
In the last years of Calvin's life, during the most eventful times,
and after his death, the plague raged with the most frightful
violence, as if God had now mercifully designed to awaken men
to more earnest reflection. Bullinger himself was attacked, bu
recovered, after losing his wife and two daughters J. "Wretched
me!" he exclaimed, "that I should survive, to follow, halt-
dead, so many to the grave !" Multitudes died of the plague in
Switzerland. , _ . , . rr ,
As in the case of Bullinger, with whom throughout his hfe he
preserved the strictest friendship, Calvin rema.ned faithfully at-
tached to his other associates, and to the companions of his youth.
Two letters still exist,written in the last years of his hfe, to Francs
Daniel, whom he knew at the University, and to whom he in
1533, dedicated one of his first works §. Thus also he manifested
his friendship for Melancthon to the end : whether Melancthon
himself valued it or not, it is equally estimable on the part of
a.d. 1563-64,] close of Calvin's life. 421
Calvin. The evening of their lives was troubled by numberless
enemies. But Calvin remained free from mistrust, and never
despaired of the human heart. In his iron breast he bore a
warm and tender spirit : as long as Melancthon lived, it was his
delight to pour out his heart to him from time to time. Thus
he described to him in confidence his infirmities and his dangers,
especially in the year 155S, rightly thinking that this might in-
terest Melancthon. The letter here referred to is a genuine
outpouring of the heart *.
Calvin still retained, in the four-and-fortieth year of his life, a
youthful feeling : he says of himself, " What a young man I
still am ! " But in the year 1558 he was attacked by a violent
fever, which bowed him down. It was now that he first began
to feel old ; and the sigh which occasionally escaped him shows
that his thoughts were turned towards home. He let fall some
words also, intimating that he hoped to see his friends again in
eternal life. His patience and resignation, his hope in God, re-
tained through those unbearable sufferings which frequently de-
prived him of sense, interest our profoundest s}Tmpathies on his
side. His spirit, amid all his trials, never failed him. All his
letters exhibit to the last, the same colour, freshness and sim-
plicity. One last sigh, and the description of his sufferings, a
month before his death, show that all his organs were invaded
by disease t- His body was in fact broken up, and only his spirit
lived in the wasted shell. The gentle and benevolent feeling
which he displayed amid all these sufferings, uttering no com-
plaints, but merely a sigh, presents him as an example to the
afflicted, and a proof of the all-sufficient power of the Holy Spirit,
even amid the tortures of the rack.
But never had Calvin been more oppressed with toil than,
owing to Beza's absence, in the last few years of his life ; hence
the fire expended itself the more rapidly. People envied Calvin
his high position ; he was spoken of as if he had been a bishop,
or lord of Geneva. We learn however from Bcza, his suc-
cessor, what were the burdens imposed upon him. If we enter his
study, we shall sec ample proofs of his diligence, even to the last.
* MS. Bern. Calv. Melancthoni, Nov. 19, 1558.
f MS. Gen. Calv. Bullingero, April u\ 15G4. The pain of his side he said
was abated, but his lungs were bo affected that he could only breathe with
great difficulty. He was afflicted with the stone, which had given him dread-
ful pain for the last twelve days. No medicine had availed to his relief. Riding
on horseback might have helped him, but he was affected with another dis-
order which prevented his sitting on horseback ; added to all this, he had the
gout. Food was scarcely tolerable to him, and wine was bitter to his palate.
422 close of calvin's life. [chap. xv.
They are to be found in his controversial writings, and still more
in his numerous commentaries, published at the close of his life.
Beza states that Calvin's concluding labour was his Latin com-
mentary on the last four books of Moses, which he translated into
French. But the commentary on Joshua followed : this he
finished while dying. The commentary on the first book of
Moses was Luther's last work. Thus Mathesius relates, that
Luther finished Genesis on the 17th of November, 1345, and
uttered these last words : u There is now our dear Genesis ; may
the Lord grant that others after me may do better than I have !
I can do no more. I am weak. Pray to the Lord for me, and
beseech him to grant me a good, happy little hour/'
Calvin's work against the Polish heretics belongs to this period ;
so also do his discourses addressed to the deputies of the Lyons
synod. In a letter written towards the end of 1563, he himself
speaks of the last literary labours in which he was engaged :
this was only five months before his death. In July 1563 he
wrote to the brethren in Dauphine, anxious to inspire them, in
those times of war and tumult, with a true feeling of the Gospel *.
He also again, in writing to Bullinger, who had desired him to
attack Brentius, expressed his feelings in respect to that violent
and unsettled man, with that clear and deep conviction, (after
the example of the gentle Peter Martyr) which attended him to
the grave f.
With the peace of God in his heart, Calvin now laid himself
down to rest. His life had been a constant struggle against the
storm ; and he felt that it had at length cast him upon the shore.
Thus after so many toils and dangers, he was filled with inward
joy. He had often said that he was never so happy as after
completing numerous and difficult labours. His whole life lay,
as it were, behind him, and the fruit of his exertions before his
eyes. Let us hear what Beza says of this period : — " In the
year 1562 it might be already seen, that Calvin was hastening
with rapid Strides to a better world. He ceased not however
to comfort the afflicted, to exhort, to preach even, and to give
lectures. The following year his sufferings so increased, that it
was difficult to conceive how so weak a body, and exhausted as
it had been by labour and sickness, could retain so strong and
mighty a spirit. But even now he could not be induced to spare
himself; for when he was obliged, against his will, to leave
the duties of his public office unfulfilled, he was employed at
* Ed. Laus. Ep. 341. Ed. Amst. p. 171, Jul. 31, 1563.
t MS. Gen. Dec. _>7, L563.
a.d. 156.3-64.] close of calvin's life. 423
home, giving advice to those who sought him, or wearing out
his amanuenses by dictating to them his works and letters.
The year 1564 was the first of his eternal rest, and the beginning,
for us, of a long and justifiable grief. On the 6th of February
he preached his last sermon, already much affected by a cough.
He was now obliged wholly to discontinue his public duties, but,
according to his wish, he was several times carried to the con-
gregation : it was on the 31st of March that this occurred for
the last time, and he could then utter only a few words."
But fearfully attacked as he was, and suffering so acutely as
he did, not a word of complaint escaped him unworthy of a
Christian, or indicative of weakness. We learn this from Beza,
who was always at his side. His last letters, addressed to the
physicians of Montpellier, and to Farel, show the most friendly
disposition. The common opinion entertained at an early period,
that there was something gloomy in his character, is strikingly
confuted by the exemplary kindness which he exhibited in this
season of suffering. When his agony was at the height, Beza re-
lates, he only raised his eyes to heaven, and exclaimed, " How long,
O Lord \" He had this expression frequently in his mouth, even
while in health, when he heard of the sufferings of his persecuted
brethren, whose afflictions distressed him day and night, far more
than his own. " When we besought him," says Beza, " to re-
frain at least during his sickness from dictating and writing, he
answered, e Would you that the Lord should find me idle when
He comes ?? " The Holy Scriptures employed him to the last :
they were to him as light in the darkness ; for they announced to
his soul the dawn of a new and eternal day. Such was the tender-
ness of his conscience that he would no longer receive his stipend,
now that he was unable to perform the duties of his office *.
On the 10th of March, the council, deeply sensible of the
greatness of the loss with which they were threatened, directed
public prayers to be offered up, as in a season of the greatest
afflictions t- Beza relates : " On the 10th of March, when several
of the brethren came to him out of the city and from the coun-
try, we found him dressed, and sitting by the tabic at which he
was accustomed to write or transact affairs. When he saw us
enter, he rested his forehead on his hand, as he was wont to do
when thinking deeply, and remained silent tor some time. At
Length he spoke, and said3 his voice frequently failing him. bul
* Registres de Geneve, l "> Mars, IS h R gist 19 Mars, 1564
424 calvin's last sickness. [chap. xv.
with a serene and smiling countenance, ' My dear brothers ! 1
thank you greatly for your tender care, and I hope a fortnight
hence to assemble you all around me, yet once more ; but it will
be for the last time*. The Lord will then, I think, reveal what
He has determined respecting me, and will probably take me to
Himself.'"
On the day which he had mentioned, that is March 24, after
he had censured the brethren according to the appointed order,
and had been censured in turn, he said, that he felt that some
alleviation of suffering was granted him by the Lord. He then
asked for a New Testament in French, and read to us some of
the marginal notes, requiring the opinion of the brethren respect-
ing them, because he had undertaken, he said, to correct them.
The following day he was not so well, the labour which he
had undergone having apparently exhausted his feeble frame.
On the 27th, however, he desired to be carried to the door of the
council- chamber. He ascended the steps leading to the hall,
supported by two attendants ; and there, having proposed to
the senate a new rector for the school, he took off his scull-cap,
and thanked the assembly for the kindness which he had ex-
perienced at its hands, and especially for the friendship which had
been shown him during his last illness. " For I feel," he said,
" that this is the last time that I shall stand here." These words
were uttered in a voice scarcely audible ; and he immediately took
his leave of the council, the members of which were moved to
tears.
" On the 2nd ot April," says Beza, " it being Easter-day, he
was carried to church in a chair. He remained during the whole
sermon, and received the sacrament from my hand. He even
joined, though with a trembling voice, the congregation in the
last hymn, £ Lord, let thy servant depart in peace :' and looking at
the countenance of the departing one, easily might we discover
the signs of Christian joyfulness."
On the 25th of the month he made his will: this instrument
is strikingly illustrative of his character. It is as a full stream
of the sentiments which filled his humble soul. He declares his
belief, and commends himself to the mercy of God ; he then dis-
poses in the whole of 225 dollars. The strict observance of form
in the will, and the severe but yet kind manner in which he
* The day alluded to was that appointed for the brotherly censureship of
sermons, &c.
a.u. 1563-64.] calvin's last sickness. 425
spoke in it of a thoughtless nephew, are very remarkable. Lu-
ther's peculiarities are also apparent in his last testament.
We quote the following passage from Calvin's : — " In the first
place, I thank God that He has not only had mercy on his poor
creature, having delivered me from the abyss of idolatry, but that
He has brought me into the clear light of his Gospel, and made
me a partaker of the doctrine of salvation, of which I was alto-
gether unworthy ; yea, that his mercy and goodness have borne
so tenderly with my numerous sins and offences, for which I de-
served to be cast from Him and destroyed. But especially is my
soul filled with thankfulness for the grace and love of the Lord,
in deigning to make use of my labour in proclaiming and extend-
ing his Gospel. I testify what I have in my soul, that I will live
and die in this faith which He has given me ; for I have no other
hope but that which rests on his free election, the only founda-
tion of my salvation ; and with my whole heart do I embrace the
mercy which Christ has prepared for me, that all my sins may
be buried through the merits of his death and sufferings. I
most humbly pray that I may be so purified and washed by the
blood of this great Redeemer, shed for the sins of mankind, that
I may be able to stand before his judgement-seat and bear his
image on me. I testify also, that according to the measure of
grace given me, I have taught his pure word, in preaching, in
works, and in the exposition of Scripture : yea, in all the contro-
versies which I have carried on against the enemies of the truth,
I have employed no sophistry, but have fought the good fight in
simplicity and truth. But, alas ! the goodwill which I have had,
and my zeal, if so it can be called, has been something so poor
and cold, that I have failed in numberless ways in fulfilling my
office ; and but for the unbounded goodness of God, my good-
will would have been but smoke ; yea, but for this, even the grace
which He gave me would have only rendered me more guilty
in his sight : therefore do I solemnly testify that I own no other
power of salvation but this, that God, who is the God of mercy,
is ready to manifest himself as the Father of so miserable a
sinner/'
His brother and Laurent de Normandie, who had come from
Noyon with him, were appointed executors of his will. It was
signed by the seven witnesses, who had been named by Calvin,
and the notary, after it had been read with a loud and articulate
voice.
It is instructive to compare with this of Calvin. Luther's cha-
426 calvin's farewell address. [chap. xv.
racteristic opinion of himself, as given in the introduction to his
will. Treating all legal forms with contempt, he says : u I am
well enough known in heaven, upon earth, and in hell ; and I
am sufficiently respected to be trusted ; for God, miserable sin-
ner as I am, and deserving of condemnation, has out of his
fatherly mercy entrusted me with the Gospel of his Son, and has
made me true and faithful therein, so that many in the world
have received it through me ; and do, therefore, own me as a
teacher of the truth ; while I have been enabled to despise the
ban of the pope, of the emperor, of kings, princes and priests ;
yea the hatred of all the devils. How then can my hand-wrriting
fail to be a sufficient witness to a thing of such little importance ;
and if it can be said, * Thus wrote Dr. Martin Luther, the stew-
ard of the things of God, and witness of his Gospel* \9"
Calvin now sent a message to the four syndics, and the several
members of the council, stating that he wished, before leaving
the world, to meet them once more in the senate-house ; and
that he would cause himself to be carried to the hall the follow-
ing day : so at least he hoped to be able to do. The senators
answered, that they should prefer to come to him, and besought
him to have regard to his health. Accordingly, on the 30th of
April, they proceeded from the council-chamber in solemn pro-
cession to his house. When they wrere assembled around him,
he collected all his strength in order to repeat to them, without
interruption, the address which he had prepared. His speech
was noted down as he delivered it : —
" Most honourable Seigneurs ! I cannot sufficiently thank you
for the marks of respect which you have bestowed upon me, and
which have been so wholly undeserved ; or for the patience with
which you have borne my manifold infirmities, always to me the
greatest proof of your friendship and benevolence. And although
I have had in my office here many struggles to endure, and have
suffered many severe injuries, for thus must every righteous man in
this world be proved, yet know7 I well that these things have not
happened through any fault of yours. My earnest prayer now
is, that if I have not been able to effect all that I should have done,
you will not attribute this to my want of will, but to my want
of means. This however I can with truth testify, that I have
been devoted with my whole soul to your republic ; and although
1 have not fulfilled my duty as I could have wished, I have
* Seckendorf, B. iii. p. 651, und De Write, Bricfsammlung, t. v. p. 422.
a.d. 15G3-64.] calvin's farewell address. 4.2~
laboured with all my strength for the common good. It would
be hypocrisy not to own that the Lord has been pleased to em-
ploy me, and that not unprontably, in his service. But one thing
more also must I earnestly entreat of you, and that is, to pardon
me if I have done little in my public and private life in com-
parison with what I ought to have done. I own especially, that I
am greatly indebted to your kindness, for bearing so patiently
with my often unbridled impetuosity. I hope and trust that God
will also forgive me the sins which I have thus committed. For
the rest, and with regard to the doctrine which you have heard
from me, I testify that I have taught it not lightly, or uncertainly,
but purely and faithfully, according to the word of God which was
entrusted to me. Were it otherwise,, I know wTell that the wrath
of God would certainly impend over me, whereas I am now con-
vinced that my labours in teaching the word have not been un-
acceptable in his sight : and this I so much the rather state be-
fore God and before you, because I doubt not that the malicious
and evil-minded will endeavour to pervert the weak, and corrupt
the pure doctrine which you have heard from me."
After having spoken at large of the boundless mercy of God,
of his goodness poured richly upon all, he exclaimed : " I myself
am the best witness of the power of the Lord to deliver you out
of the greatest dangers. You know well what position your
state occupies ; good or ill may befall you in these circumstances ;
I adjure you therefore before God, always to bear in mind that it
is God alone who gives strength to states and cities, and that
He demands of men the honour due to his omnipotence. Re-
member that David, that great king, testifies, that he fell the low-
est while he was in the enjoyment of the profoundest peace ; and
that he would never have risen again, had not God in his infinite
goodness stretched out his hand to him. How would it be then
with us, poor, weak and wretched as we are, seeing that sucli
was the case with so strong and mighty a man? The greatest
possible humility of heart is necessary to you, that you may pur-
sue your course with foresight and in the fear of God, ever hiding
yourselves under his wings. Then will you be convinced thai
his help is a sufficient support, as you have before so often found
it, even though the safety and prosperity of the state should Beem
to hang but on a little thread.
"And if it should be well with you, 1 beseech you do not fol-
low the example of the unbelievers, but praise God with all hu-
mility. It' misfortune should happen to you. and death should
428 calvin's farewell address. [chap. xv.
threaten you on all sides, then place your hope on Him who can
even raise the dead. At such a time be especially convinced that
you are visited by God, in order that you may learn to humble
yourselves, and seek the covert of his wings. If you would pre-
serve this republic in its present firm and happy condition, take
care above all things not to suffer the holy institution which God
has planted among you to be polluted with sin and blasphemy.
He alone is the great God, the King of kings and Lord of lords,
who puts honour upon those who honour Him, and casts down
the scorners. Pray to Him according to his own law ; and be-
come more and more perfect in this knowledge, for we are
always most distant from that in which we ought to be the most
perfect. I know well enough the temper and manners of each one
among you ; and know also that you need admonition ; not one
of you, even the most excellent, is without many faults. Let
every one, therefore, examine himself, and pray the Lord to be-
stow upon him that in which he is wanting.
" We see how many^ and what great defects there are in most of
the assemblies, in which the business of temporal states is carried
on. One party is cold and negligent as to the public welfare,
in order that it may secure its own advantage ; another yields
itself to its passions and prejudices ; while a third abuses the
glorious gifts of God, or becomes proud, and with a haughty trust
in its own sufficiency, insists that that which seems good to itself,
shall be accepted as such by all others. I exhort the aged, in
the name of God, not to manifest envy towards the young who
may be adorned with especial gifts. I exhort the younger to
prove themselves free from all haughtiness of mind. Let not
the one interrupt the course of the other : avoid personal enmi-
ties, and all those bitternesses which have turned so many in
the government of republics from the right path. You will not
fall into such errors if you severally confine yourselves to the
duty which belongs to each, and execute faithfully the part en-
trusted to you by the state. In the execution of justice, I adjure
you never to exhibit the slightest trace of favour or dislike. Let
no one mar the right by subterfuge or art : let no one endeavour
by his influence to contravene the strictness of the law : let no
one swerve from what is just and honest.
" But should any one be tempted by a wrong feeling, let him
be resisted with firmness ; and let your looks be directed above
to Him from whom all power is derived, and ask of Him the
Holy Spirit. Lastly, I again beseech you to pardon my weak-
a.d. 1563-64.] calvin's farewell address. 429
nesses, known as they are to God and the angels, and which,
honourable sirs, I do not wish to conceal from you."
Having thus spoken, Calvin prayed to the great and good God,
that he mm-ht furnish the members of the council with increased
o
gifts of grace, and so lead them by his Holy Spirit, that they
might labour effectually both for their own salvation, and for
that of the people. He then offered his right hand to all present,
and left them deeply affected and shedding floods of tears, as if
taking their last leave of a father*.
On the 28th of April, when all the ministers of the Genevese ter-
ritory were assembled at his house, according to his wish, he thus
addressed them : " Do you, my brothers, when I am dead, perse-
vere in this work, and your spirit will never faint ; for the Lord
will preserve this church and this republic against all the threats
of their enemies. Let no strife exist among you, but exercise love
one towards another. Never let the thought escape you of what
you owe to this church, in which the Lord has placed you, and
let nothing separate you from it. I know well enough that
there are some, who when weary and disgusted with their duty,
can easily invent excuses for forsaking it ; but they will soon
discover that the ' Lord is not mocked.5 When I first came to
this city, the Gospel was already preached here, but the greatest
disorder prevailed on all sides, as if Christianity consisted wholly
in the destruction of images. Nor were there wanting occasions
of offence, which caused me endless distress. But the Lord, He is
our God, so strengthened me, fearful and weak as I was by nature,
that I never yielded to my adversaries : I returned hither from
Strasburg, obeying the call, against my own will, because I
thought that I could not be useful here ; not knowing what the
Lord had in store for me, and because the undertaking was in-
volved in manifold and great difficulties.
" But as I continued to proceed in the work. I at length dis-
covered, by the thing itself, that the Lord had blessed my la-
bour. Do you, therefore, persevere in this calling : hold fast
the established order, anil exert yourselves to the end, that the
people may be preserved in the love of pure doctrine. There
are still among us some perverse and wicked spirits. But the
whole, as you see, is not now evilly disposed ; you would there-
fore be the more guilty in the sight of God, it' by your negli-
gence all were again to be thrown into confusion. — Further:
* They thanked him tor all the services Ik- had rendered them ; and assured
him, that they would always manifest their love to the surviving members of
his family, for his sake.
430 calvin's last hours. [chap. xv.
My brothers, I testify to you, that a true and earnest affection has
ever united me to you, and that I bid you farewell with the same
feeling. If I have often during my sickness appeared less friendly,
pardon me. I cannot thank you enough for having taken upon
you, while I have been thus suffering, the burden of my duties."
He then extended his right hand to each ; ei and we went from
him," says Beza, "with very heavy hearts and wet eyes."
Having learnt on the 2nd of May, by a letter from Farel, that
that now aged man, thinking more of his sick friend than of him-
self, proposed making a journey to Geneva, Calvin wrote to him
the following letter in Latin* : — "Farewell, my best and most
faithful brother : since it is God's will that you should survive me,
live in the constant recollection of our union, which, in so far as
it was useful to the church of God, will still bear for us abiding
fruit in heaven. I wish you not to fatigue yourself on my ac-
count. My breath is weak, and I continually expect it to leave
me. It is enough for me that I live and die in Christ, who is
gain to his people both in life and in death. Once more farewell,
with the brethren. Geneva, May 2, 1564." But notwithstanding
this letter, the good old man came to Geneva, and having once
more conversed with his friend and embraced him, he returned to
Neuchatel.f
" The few remaining days of his life," says Beza, " Calvin
spent in almost constant prayer. So weak, however, was his
voice, through the shortness of his breath, that for the most part
his sighs only were audible. But his eyes shone bright to the
last, and he raised them to heaven, with such an expression, that
it was easy to learn from them the fervour of his prayer. He
frequently repeated in his agony, with profound sighs, the words
of David, 6 Lord, I opened not my mouth, for it was thy doing :'
and from time to time those of Isaiah, e I mourn as a dove/
I have also heard that he said, 'Thou dost sorely afflict me,
O Lord : but it is consolation enough for me, and I suffer it wil-
lingly, since it is thine hand.'
" His doors must have stood open day and night, if all had
* Viret, it appears, was far distant. Kircbhofer says that Viret and Fabri
laboured boldly in France, at Lyons, after Calvin's death (B. ii.p. 162). The
letter here quoted is, Ep. 344. Ed. Laus., Ed. Amst. p. 172.
f Of Farel, we are told that he did not long survive his friend. His missionary
zeal continued active to the last : unable to rest at home, he was continually
seeking some new scene of action abroad. Thus in the spring of 1565, when
he was 76 years old, he went to Metz, the sphere of his earliest labours. Ar-
riving on the 12th of May, he preached and returned to Neuchatel, where he
soon after died of exhaustion. He left behind him a son, and a little property
of 120 livres. Ruchat, vii. pp. 75, 76-
a.d. 1563-64.] calvin's last hours. . 431
been allowed to enter who came to manifest their sympathy with
him ; but as the weakness of his voice would not suffer him to
speak with them, he desired that every one might be told that he
would rather have his friends pray for him, than afflict themselves
with the sight of his sufferings. He frequently said to me, whose
presence, as I often heard, was never unacceptable to him, that it
was a matter of conscience with him to disturb me as little as
possible in the duties of my office. He was always so careful
of time which belonged to the church, that, exercising almost too
great a degree of strictness, he would not allow his friends to
trouble themselves in the least about him, whereas they could
have no greater joy in the world than to serve him.
; " He thus continued to linger, consoling himself and his friends,
till the 19th of May, on which day we were to hold our custom-
ary censure of the preachers, and to dine together in token of
mutual friendship, seeing that two days afterwards we were to
celebrate the Lord's Supper and the Easter-festival. He had
given us permission to prepare our meal this day in his own
house ; and collecting all his strength, he desired to be carried
from his bed into the next chamber. He then said, c I come to
you for the last time, my brothers, and shall no more sit at the
table with you.' Such was the mournful beginning of this din-
ner : he however delivered the prayer, and took some food, his
conversation being even cheerful, as far as it could be at such a
time. The meal was not finished when he desired to be carried
into the neighbouring room, where he addressed the company in
the most joyous accents, and said, f This wall of separation will
not prevent me, though bodily absent, from being present at
your meetings in spirit.' This was doubtless said in reference
to his approaching death. What he had intimated took place.
He continued from this day in a lying posture : his body, with the
exception of his countenance, which always remained the same,
was so emaciated., that it might have been especially said of him,
that the spirit only was left."
Thus, those who saw Calvin on his death-bed might well re-
collect the case of Joshua the high-priest*, when Israel came out
of captivity, and God spake to the prophet, " Is not this a brand
plucked out of the fire ?" So this man, adorned as he was with
such various gifts, now lay there like a withered leaf.
"The day," continues Beza, "on which he died, namely May
27th, he seemed to suffer less, and even to speak with greater
* Zcchariah iii. 1.
432 Calvin's death. [chap. xv.
ease ; but this was the last effort of nature. In the evening, about
eight o'clock, the sure signs of death became suddenly apparent.
As soon as this was made known to me, and to one of the bre-
thren, by the servants, I hastened to the bed-side, and found him
just as he quietly expired : neither feet nor hands were con-
vulsed ; he had not even breathed hard. He had retained his con-
sciousness and reason to the end. Even his voice was preserved
till his last breath, and he looked rather like one sleeping than
one dead. Thus on this day, with the setting sun, the brightest
light in the world, and he who had been the strength of the
church, was taken back to heaven.
" During the night, and on the following day, great was the
mourning throughout the city. The entire state wept for the pro-
phet of the Lord ; the church lamented the departure of its faith-
ful pastor ; the academy the loss of so great a teacher : all ex-
claimed in their grief, that they had lost a father, who, after God,
was their truest friend and comforter. Many inhabitants of the
city desired to see him after he was dead, and could hardly be
induced to leave his remains.
" Some of those also, who had come from distant places to make
his acquaintance and to hear him, among whom was a very di-
stinguished man, the ambassador of the queen of England to
France, were particularly anxious to behold his countenance, even
in death. At first, all who wished were admitted ; but as they were
merely influenced by curiosity, it seemed advisable to his friends,
in order to prevent the misrepresentations of adversaries, to put
him early the next day, which was Sunday, in a shroud, and then
inclose him as usual in a wooden coffin. At two o'clock in the
afternoon, he was carried to the city church-yard, called the Plain-
Palais. All the patricians of the city followed ; they were accom-
panied by the clergy, the professors of the high-school, and by
almost the whole city; not without many tears."
He was buried without the slightest pomp : this was ac-
cording to his own expressed desire. Beza however wrote an
epitaph on him. He had lived fifty-four years, ten months,
seventeen days ; and the half of this time he had consecrated to
the service of the Gospel. Respecting his last will, the Genevese
neither raised a monument to his memory, nor marked his grave
with a stone. Thus, in the church-yard which is so decorated
with the tombs of others, the grave of Calvin is unmarked and
unknown. It will be shown at the last day. A beautiful brass
medal has been lately cast in honour of his name. But his
a.d. 1563-64.] beza's character op Calvin. 433
writings, and the example of his firm faith, have a durability
greater than that of marble and brass ; and certain it is, that
wherever a church is praying, or a martyr is struggling for the
faith, there Calvin is also present with his power of faith and
prayer.
In proportion to the grief experienced in the reformed church,
was the joy of the Roman Catholics. The pope expected that he
might again win Geneva to his side, and even named seven
missionaries for this especial work ; but the council venerated
the majesty of Calvin's character, and held firm to the truth, as
if it had still the invisible before its eyes*.
Calvin died in Beza's arms : knowing that he deserved his
entire confidence, he had charged him in his last hours with the
duty of editing his correspondence for the use of the church f.
Beza was Calvin's worthy successor, and was as free from am-
bition as Calvin himself.
We may here properly subjoin Beza's rapid sketch of Calvin's
character. It forms the conclusion of his biography, and is a
simple, fitting memorial, in harmony with the nature of the great
man to whom it relates. The true spirit of olden times breathes
in its language, and it may well be classed with the best com-
positions of the kind. The writer begins with the mention of
Calvin's outward life, and then proceeds to that of his spiritual
character.
" Calvin was not of large stature : his complexion was pale,
and rather brown : even to his last moments his eyes were pecu-
liarly bright, and indicative of his penetrating genius. He knew
nothing of luxury in his outward life, but was fond of the greatest
neatness, as became his thorough simplicity : his manner of
living was so arranged, that he showed himself equally averse to
extravagance and parsimony : he took so little nourishment, such
being the weakness of his stomach, that for many years he con-
tented himself with one meal a day. Of sleep he had almost
none : his memory was incredible ; he immediately recognized,
after many years, those whom he had once seen ; and when he
had been interrupted for several hours, in some work about which
he was employed, he could immediately resume and continue it,
without reading again what he had before written. Of the nu-
* See Beza's Life of Calvin in French, p. 54.
t See Beza's Dedication of Calvin's correspondence to the Count Palatine
Frederic.
VOL. II. 2 F
434 beza's character of CALVIN. [chap. XV.
merous details connected with the business of his office, he never
forgot even the most trifling, and this notwithstanding the in-
credible multitude of his affairs. His judgement was so acute
and correct in regard to the most opposite concerns about which
his advice was asked, that he often seemed to possess the gift of
looking into the future. I never remember to have heard that
any one who followed his counsel went wrong. He despised fine
speaking, and was rather abrupt in his language ; but he wrote
admirably, and no theologian of his time expressed himself so
clearly, so impressively and acutely as he, and yet he laboured as
much as any one of his contemporaries, or of the fathers. For this
fluency he was indebted to the several studies of his youth, and
to the natural acuteness of his genius, which had been still further
increased by the practice of dictation, so that proper and digni-
fied expressions never failed him, whether he was writing or
speaking. He never, in any wise, altered the doctrine which he
first adopted, but remained true to it to the last, — a thing which
can be said of few theologians of this period.
" Although nature had endowed Calvin with a dignified serious-
ness, both in manner and character, no one was more agreeable
than he in ordinary conversation. He could bear, in a wonderful
manner, with the failings of others, when they sprung from mere
weakness : thus he never shamed any one by ill-timed reproofs,
or discouraged a weak brother; while, on the other hand, he
never spared or overlooked wilful sin. An enemy to all flattery,
he hated dissimulation, especially every dishonest sentiment in
reference to religion : he was therefore as powerful and stormy
an enemy to vices of this kind, as he was a devoted friend to
truth, simplicity and uprightness. His temperament was natu-
rally choleric, and his active public life had tended greatly to in-
crease this failing ; but the Spirit of God had taught him so to
moderate his anger, that no word ever escaped him unworthy of
a righteous man. Still less did he ever commit aught unjust
towards others. It was then only, indeed, when the question
concerned religion, and when he had to contend against hard-
ened sinners, that he allowed himself to be moved and excited
beyond the bounds of moderation.
" Let us take but a single glance at the history of those men
who, in any part of the world, have been distinguished for their
virtues, and no one will be surprised at finding, that the great and
noble qualities which Calvin exhibited, both in his private and
public life, excited against him a host of enemies. We ought
a.d. 1563-64.] beza's character of calvin. 435
not indeed to feel any wonder, that so powerful a champion of
pure doctrine, and so stern a teacher of sound morals, as well at
home as in the world, should be so fiercely assailed. Rather
ought we to let our admiration dwell on the fact, that standing
alone as he did, like the renowned hero of antiquity, he was suf-
ficiently mighty among Christians to bridle so many monsters,
availing himself only of that strongest of clubs, the Word of God.
Thus, however numerous the adversaries which Satan excited
against him (for he never had any but such as had declared war
with piety and virtue), the Lord gave his servant sufficient
strength to gain the victory over all.
" Having been for sixteen years a witness of his labours, I
have pursued the history of his life and death with all fidelity ;
and I now unhesitatingly testify, that every Christian may find
in this man the noble pattern of a truly Christian life and Chris-
tian death ; a pattern, however, which it is as easy to counterfeit
as it is difficult to imitate/'
f J
APPENDIX.
Vol. I. page 412.
The following is a copy of the Liturgical Prayer, which Calvin ap-
pointed to be repeated after the singing of the Psalms : —
" Nous invoquerons notre bon Dieu et pere, le suppliant que comme
toute plenitude de sagesse et lumiere gist en lui, qu'il nous veuille illu-
miner par son St. esprit en la vraie intelligence de sa parole, nous faire
grace que nous la recevions en vraie crainte et humilite, que nous
soyons enseignes par icelle de mettre pleinement notre fiance en lui seul,
le servir et honorer comme il appartient pour glorifier son St. nom en
toute notre vie, et edifier nos prochainspar nos bons exemples, lui ren-
dant l'amour et la crainte que doivent fideles serviteurs a leurs maitrcs
et enfans a leurs peres, puisqu'il lui a plu nous faire cctte grace de nous
recevoir au nombre de ses serviteurs et enfans. Et le prierons ainsi
que notre bon maitre nous a enseigne, N. p."
Vol. II. page 194.
The following is the original of the curious document which the first
accuser of Servetus presented to the Council : —
" Requete de Nicolas de la Fontaine.
(Rilliet, Rel. du proc. crim. p. 33.)
" Pardevant Vous, magnificques, puissans et trcs-redoubtez Seigneurs,
propose Nicolas de la Fontaine sestant constitue prisonnier en cause
criminelle contre Michel Servet pour les graves scandales et troubles
que le diet Servet a desja faict par lespace de vingt quattre ans ou cn-
vyron en la chresticnte, pour les blasphemes qu'il a prononce et eseript
contre Dieu, pour les heresies dont il a infecte le monde, pour les mes-
chantes calumnies et faulses diff'amations quil a public contre les vrais
serviteurs de Dieu et notament contre Mr. Calvin duquel le diet pro-
posant est tenu de maintenir riionneur comme de ><>n pasteur, sil veult
estre tenu pour chrcstien, et aussi a cause du blasme, et deshonneur qui
pourroit avenir al'eglise de Geneve pourceque le diet Servel condamne
par especial la doctrine quon y presche.
" Daultant que du jour dhier le did Servel fust examine et ne re-
sponds nullement a propos, ains, au lieu de respond re pertinement par
oui ou non, diet cc que bon luy serabla comme vous pourrez voir (pie
438 APPENDIX.
la pluspart de ses responses sont que chansons frivoles quil vous plaise
le constraindre a respondre formellement sur cliacun article sans ex-
travaguer a^in quil ne se mocque plus de Dieu ne de voz Seigneuries et
aussi que le diet proposant ne soit frustre de son bon droict.
" Et quant le diet proposant aura verifie son intention, et que le diet
Servet aura este convaincu davoir escript et dogmatise les heresies con-
tenues aux interrogatoires, le diet proposant vous supplie humblement,
que si vous congnoissez le diet Servet estre criminel et digne destre
poursuyvy par vostre procureur fiscal, il vous plaise en faire declaration
et le vouloir delivrer avec victoire de tous despens, dommaiges et inter-
ests, non pas quil fuye ou refuse de poursuivre une telle cause et que-
relle, laquelle tous chrestiens et enfans de Dieu doibvent maintenir
jusques a la mort, mais pour ce quil entend que les us et coustumes de
vostre ville portent cela, et que ce nest pas a luy dentreprendre sur la
charge et office daultruy."
Vol. II. page 211.
" Requete de Michael Servet.
" Tres-honores Seigneurs !
" Je suis detenu en accusation criminelle de la part de Jehan Calvin,
lequel ma faulsament accuse disant que javes escript 1. que les ames
estiont mortelles et aussi que Jesu Christ navoyt prins de la Vierga
Maria que la quatriesme partie de son corps. Ce sont choses horribles
et execrables. En tomes les aultres heresies et en tous les aultres
crimes ny en a poynt de si grand que de faire lame mortelle. Car a,
tous les aultres il y a sperance de salut et non point a cestui-ci. Qui
diet cela ne croyt poynt quil y aie Dieu, ni justice, ni resurrection, ni
Jesu Christ, ni sainte escriture, ni rien : sinon que tout e mort et que
homme et beste soyt tout un. Si javes diet cela, non seulement diet,
mais escript publicament pour enfecir le monde, je me condamneres
moy-mesme a mort.
" Pourquoy, Mcsseigneurs, je demande que mon faulx accusateur
soit puni poena talionis, et que soyt detenu prisonnier comme moy jus-
ques a ce la cause soyt diffinie pour mort de luy ou de moy, ou aultre
poine. Et pour ce faire, je me inscris contra luy a la dicte poine de
talion. Et suys content de morir, si non est convaincu, tant de cecy
que daultres choses que je luy mettre dessus. Je vous demande justice,
Mcsseigneurs, justice, justice, justice.
"Faict en vos prisons de Geneve, le 22 de Septembre 1553.
"Michel Servetus
en sa cause propre."
The above was accompanied by another paper, in which Servetus
APPENDIX. 439
enumerated six points in reference to the part which Calvin took in his
apprehension at Vienne, and in regard to which he insisted that he
ought to be judicially examined. Four other points also were stated
upon which Servetus grounded his accusation of Calvin.
" Messeigneurs, il y a quatre raisons grandes et infaillibles, par les
quieles Calvin doyt estre condamne.
" La premiere est, pour ce que la matiere de la doctrine nest poynt
subjecte a accusation criminelle, comme vous ay monstre par mes rc-
questes et monstrare plus amplement par les anciens docteurs de leglise.
Pour quoy il a grandament abusse de la criminalite et contre lestat dun
ministre de levangile.
" La seconde raison est, pour ce quil est faulx accusateur, comme la
presente inscription vous monstre et se prouvera facilement par la
lecture de mon livre.
" La tierse est, que par frivoles et calumnieuses raisons veult oppri-
mer la verite de Jesu Christ, comme par le rapport de nos escritures
vous sera manifested Car il y a mis de grandes menteries et meschan-
cetes.
" La quatrieme raison est, que en grande partie il ensuyt la doctrine
de Simon Magus contre tous les docteurs qui furent jamays en leglise.
Pourquoy comme magicien quil est, doyt non seulement estre condamne,
mays doyt estre extermine et dechace de vostre ville. Et son bien doyt
estre adjuge a moy en recompanse du mien, que luy ma faict perdre,
la quiele chose, Messeigneurs, je vous demande. Faict le jour que
dessus, etc.
"Michel Servetus
en sa cause propre."
Vol. II. page 215.
The sentence passed on Servetus was couched in the following terms.
Whether Calvin had any share in its composition may be questioned.
" Le proces faict et forme par devant noz trcs redoubtez Seigneurs,
scindiques, juges des causes criminelles de ceste Cite a la poursuitte
et instance du Seigneur Lieutenant de ceste diete Cite, es dictes
causes instant Contre Michel Servet, de Villencufve au Royaume
d'Aragon en Hespagne.
"Lequel premierement est este atteiut d'avoir, il y a environ vingt
troys a vingt quatre ans faict imprinter ung Livre a Agnon en Ale-
magne contre la saincte et individue Trinitc, contenant plusieurs et
grans blasphemes contre icelle, grandement Bcandaleux es Eglisei dea
dictes Alemagnes: lequel livre il a spontanement confesse* avoir faicl
imprimer, nonobstant les remonstrances et corrections a luy faictea de
440 APPENDIX.
ses faulses opinions par les scavants docteurs evangelistes d'icelles
Eglises des dictes Alemagnes.
" Item, et lequel livre est este par les docteurs d'icelles Eglises d'Ale-
magne comme plein d'heresie reprouve, et le diet Servet rendu fugitif
des dictes Alemagnes a cause du diet livre.
" Item, et nonobstant cela le diet Servet a persevere en ses faulses
erreurs, infectant d'icelles plusieurs a son possible.
" Item, et non content de cela pour mieulx divulguer et espancher
son diet venin et heresie dempuis peu de temps en ca il a faict im-
primer un aultre livre a cachettes dans Vienne en Daulphine, remply
desdictes heresies, horribles et execrables blasphemes contre la saincte
Trinite, contre le Filz de Dieu, contre le baptesme des petis enfans et
aultres plusieurs saincts passages et fondemens de la religion chresti-
enne.
" Item, a spontanement confesse qu'en iceluy livre il appelle ceux
qui croyent en la Trinite, trinitaires et atheistes.
" Item, et qu'il appelle icelle Trinite ung Diable et monstre a troys
testes.
"Item, et contre le vray fondement de la religion chrestienne et
blasphemant detestablement contre le filz de Dieu, a diet Jesus Christ
nestre filz de Dieu de toute eternite, ains tant seulement dempuis son
incarnation.
" Item, et contre ce que dit le scripture, Jesus Christ estre filz de
David selon la chair, il le nye malheureusement, disant iceluy estre
cree de la substance de Dieu le Pere, ayant receu troys elemens
diceluy, et un tant seulement de la Vierge : En quoy meschamment il
pretend abolir la vraye et entiere humanite de nostre Seigneur Jesus
Christ, la souveraine consolation du pouvre genre humain.
" Item, et que le baptesme des petits enfans nest qu'une invention
diabolique et sorcellerie.
" Item, et plusieurs aultres pointz et articles et execrables blasphemes
desquelz ledict livre est tout farcy, grandement scandaleux et contre
l'honneur et majeste de Dieu, du filz de Dieu et du Sainct Esprit :
qu'est ung cruel et horrible murtrissement, perdition et ruine de plu-
sieurs pouvres ames, estant par sa dessus dicte desloyable et detestable
doctrine trahies. Chose epouvantable a reciter !
" Item, et lequel Servet remply de malice intitula iceluy son livre,
ainsi drcsse contre Dieu et sa saincte doctrine evangelique, Christia-
nismi Restitutio, qu'est a dire restitution du christianisme ; et ce pour
mieulx seduyre et tromper les pouvres ignorans et pour plus commode-
ment infecter de son malheureux et meschant venin les lecteurs de son
diet livre, soubz l'umbre de bonne doctrine.
" Item, et oultre le dessus diet livre, assaillant par lettres mesmes
nostre foy et mettant peine icelle infecter de sa poison, a voluntaire-
APPENDIX. 441
ment confe9se et recogneu avoir escriptes lettres a ung des ministres
de ceste cite, dans laquelle entre aultres plusieurs horribles et enormes
blasphemes contre nostre saincte religion evangelique : il dit nostre
evangile estre sans foy et sans Dieu et que pour ung Dieu nous avons
ung Cerbere a troys testes.
" Item, eta davantage voluntairementconfesse, qu'au dessusdict lieu
de Vienne, a cause diceluy meschant et abominable livre et opinions, il
fut faict prisonnier, lesquelles prisons perfidement il rompit et eschapa.
" Item, et n'est seulement dresse ledict Servet en sa doctrine contre
la vraye religion chrestienne, mais comme arrogant innovateur dhere-
sies, contre la papistique et aultres, si que a Vienne mesmes il est este
brusle en effigie et de sesdictz livres cinq basles bruslees.
" Item, et nonobstant tout cela, estant icy es prisons de ceste cite
detenu, n'a laisse de persister malicieusement en ses dictes meschantes
et detestables erreurs, les taschant soustenir avec injures et calumnies
contre tous vrays chrestiens et fideles ten emen tiers de la pure imma-
culee religion chrestienne les appellant trinitaires, atheistes et sorciers,
nonobstant les remonstrances a luy desia des long temps en Alemagne,
comment est diet, faictes et au mespris des reprehensions, emprisonne-
ments et corrections a luy tant ailleurs que icy faictes. Comme plus
amplement et au long est contenu en son proces.
" Et Nous sindiques, juges des causes criminelles de ceste cite, ayans
veu le proces faict et forme devant Nous, a linstance de nostre lieute-
nant es dictes causes instant, contre Toy, Michel Servet de Villeneufve
au royaume d'Arragon en Espagne, par lequel et tes voluntaires confes-
sions en noz mains faictes, et par plusieurs foys reiterees et tez livres
devant Nous produictz, nous conste et apart Toy Servet avoir des long-
temps mys en avant doctrine faulse et pleinement hereticale et icelle,
mettant arrier toutes remonstrances et corrections, avoir d'une mali-
cieuse et perverse obstination, perseveremment semee et divulguee
jusques a impression de livres publiques, contre Dieu le Pere, le Filz et
le Sainct Esprit : brefz contre les vrays fondemens de la religion chres-
tienne et pour cella tasche de faire schisme et troble en leglise de Dieu,
dont meintes ames ont pu estre ruinees et perdues ; chose horrible et
espouvantable, scandaleuse et infectante, et n'avoir heu honte ni horreur
de te dresser toutallement contre la majeste divine et saincte Trinite :
ains avoyr mys peyne et testre employe obstinement a infecter le mondc
de tez heresies et puante poyson hereticale, Cas et crime dheresie
griefz et detestable et meritant grieve punition corporelle.
"A cez causes et aultres justes a ce Nous mouvantes, desirana de
purger leglise deDieu de tel infectement et retrancher dycelle tel niem-
bre pourry, ayans heu bonne participation de conseil avec noz citoyens
et ayans invoque le nom de Dieu, pour faire droit jugement, Beans pour
tribunal au lieu de nos majeurs, ayans Dieu et ses saintes cscriptures
442 APPENDIX.
devant noz yeux, clisans au nom du Pere, du Filz et du Sainct Esprit,
par iceste nostre diffinitive sentence, laquelle donnons ycy par escript,
Toy Michel Servet condamnons a debvoir estre lie et mene au lieu de
Champel, et la debvoir estre a un pilotis attache, et brusle tout vifz
avec ton livre, tant escript de ta main qu'imprime, jusques a ce que ton
corps soit reduict en cendre ; et ainsin iiniras tez jours, pour donner
exemple aux aultres, qui tel cas vouldroient commettre. Et a Vous
nostre lieutenant, commandons nostre presente sentence faictes mectre
en execution."
Vol. II. page 11.
The following is the original Latin of Calvin's letter to Luther : —
il Excellentissimo Christiana? Ecclesiae Pastori, D. M. Luthero, Patri
mihi plurimum observando.
u S. Cum Gallos nostros viderem, quotquot a tenebris Papatus ad
fidei sanitatem reducti erant, nihil tamen de confessione mutare, ac
proinde se polluere sacrilegiis Papistarum, ac si nullum verse doctrinae
gustum haberent, temperare mihi non potui, quin tantam sane socor-
diam, sicuti meo iudicio merebatur, acriter reprehenderem. Qualis
enim haec fides, qua? intus in animo sepulta, nullam in fidei confessionem
erumpit ? Qualis religio, quae sub idololatriae simulatione deinersa
iacet? Verum hie argumentum tractandum non suscipio, quod libellis
duobus copiose sum prosequutus, unde si obiter eos adspicere molestum
non erit, turn quid sentiam, turn quibus impulsus rationibus ita sentiam,
melius perspicies. Horum vero lectione nonnulli ex nostris hominibus
expergefaoti, cum antea secure dormirent altum somnum, cogitare
coeperunt, quidnam sibi agendum foret. Sed quia durum est vel omissa
ratione sui vitam exponere periculo, vel, concitatis hominum oflfen-
sionibus, mundi invidiam subire, vel, relictis fortunis et natali solo,
voluntarium adire exilium, his difficultatibus retinentur, quo minus
certi quidquam constituti habeant. Alias tamen rationes, et quidem
speciosas obtendunt, sed quibus appareat praetextum ab illis qualem-
cunque quaeri. Caeterum, quia suspensi quodammodo haesitant, tuuni
iudicium audire desiderant, quod ut merito reverentur, ita illis magnae
confirmationis loco erit. Me ergo rogarunt, ut certum nuncium data
opera ad te mitterem, qui responsum super hac re tuum ad nos referret:
ego vero, quia et ipsoruui magnopere interesse putabam, tua authoritate
adiuvari, ne sic perpetuo fluctuentur, et mihi ipsi ultro expetendum id
fuit, negare illis nolui, quod postulabant. Nunc ergo, Pater in Domino
plurimum observande, per Christum te obtestor, hoc ut taedium mea et
ipsorum causa devorare non graveris, primum, ut Epistolam eorum no-
mine scriptam et Libellos raeos, tanquam per lusum, otiosis horis per-
APPENDIX. 443
curras, vel legendi negotium alicui demandes, qui tibi summam referat :
deinde, ut sententiam tuam paucis verbis rescribas : invitus equidem
facio, ut tibi inter tot tarn graves et varias occupationes banc molestiam
exhibeam, sed, quae tua est aequitas, cum non nisi necessitate coactus
id faciam, veniam te mihi daturum confido. Utinam isthuc mihi, quo
saltern ad paucas horas tuo congressu fruerer, lieeret advolare ! mallem
enim et longe praestaret, non de hac quaestione modo, sed de aliis etiam
tecum coram agere : veruni, quod hie in terris non datur, brevi, spero,
in regno Dei nobis continget. Vale, clarissime vir, prsestantissime
Christi Minister, ac Pater mihi semper honorande. Dominus te spiritu
suo gubernare pergat usque in finem, in commune Ecclesiae suae bonum.
12 Calend. Febr. 1545.
"Johannes Calvinus tuus."
Melancthon's Answer to the above.
" Clarissimo Viro, eruditione et virtute praestanti, D. Joanni Calvino,
Pastori Ecclesiae Genevensis, pio et fideli Amico suo, charissimo
P. Melancthon S. 1545.
"Imo vero, Calvine charissime, mihi consilium de me ipso ostendas.
Crescit enim hie certamen quod antea defugi. Cumque hactenus par-
cendum tranquillitati Ecclesiarum in his regionibus feris et horridis
senserim, moderatissimeque loquutus sim, nunc duriora a me postulan-
tur. Oro autem te ut me Deo piis votis commendes. D. Martino non
exhibui tuam epistolam, multa enim suspiciose accipit : et non vult
circumferri suas responsiones de talibus quasstionibus quas proposuisti.
Ego utcunque respondi, nee meum judicium antefero tuae et aliorum
piorum virorum sententiae. Scio me avev <pi\ovet.Ki<ts versatum esse in
negotiis ecclesiasticis, et mediocriter dedisse operam ut multas res in-
volutas evolvercm et explicarem. Nunc exilia et alias aerumnas excepto.
Bene vale, die quo ante annos 3846 Noe arcam ingressus est, quo ex-
emplo Deus testatus est, se Ecclesiam suam, etiam cum ingentibus
fluctibus quassatur, non deserere."
445
INDE X.
Albret, Johanna, mother of
Henry IV., i. 19.
Amboise, the conspiracy of, ii. .'369 ;
Calvin's connection with, ii. 448.
Ameanx, prosecution and punishment
of his wife, ii. 49 ; his attack on
Calvin, ii. 57 ; Calvin's severity to-
wards, ii. 58.
Anabaptists, in France and Germany,
i. 40 ; the Reformation hindered by,
ib.; Calvin's opposition to, and fun-
damental errors of some, ib. ; Cal-
vin's work ' Psychopanny chia' di-
rected against, i. 42 ; driven out of
Geneva by Calvin, i. 114; Calvin
writes against, ii. 42.
Angels, Calvin's doctrine respecting,
i. 191.
Anton, king of Navarre, declares for
the Reformation, ii. 362 ; falling
away from the faith and Calvin's
correspondence with, ii. 'S7G.
Apocalypse, Calvin's opinion of, and
reasons for not commenting on, i.
221, 225.
Art, as affected by the Reformation,
i. 416.
Astrologv, Calvin's work against, ii.
37.
Audin's life of Calvin, ii. 107.
Augustine's view of conversion, i.
205; of the church, i. 212.
Balduin, Francis, his changes in re-
ligion, ii. 410; his dispute with
Calvin, ii. 411.
Baptism, the doctrine of, i. 82 ; Cal-
vin's view of, i. 473 ; of infant,
i. 83, 204 ; of the celebration of,
i. 205.
Bayle, his opinion of Calvin, i. 221.
Relief, in the holy church, i. 372;
harmony of Calvin's and Luther's,
ii. 95.
Bern, progress of the Reformation in,
i. 90 ; its hostility to Calvin, ii.
143; Calvin's discussion in the
council of, ii. 30 ; quarrel with the
Genevese, ii. 144 ; repudiates the
practice of excommunication, ii.
325.
Bernhard, a preacher of Geneva,
urges Calvin's return to that citv,
i. 250.
Berthelier, Philip, prosecution and
acquittal of, ii. 30/ .
Beza, life and character of, i. 110, ii.
383 ; his friendship for Calvin, ib. ;
respecting Calvin's character, i.
276 ; answers Castellio's essay on
toleration, ii. 36 ; characteristics of,
ii. 85; Calvin's early friendship
with, ii. 84, 112; his firm friend-
ship for Calvin, ii. 151 ; his arrival
in Geneva, ii. 84 ; at the colloquy
at Poissy, ii. 380, 385 ; letters from
Calvin to, ii. 383, 391 ; his influ-
ence in France, ii. 394 ; his con-
duct during the French religious
war, ii. 398 ; at the battle of Dreux,
ii. 401 ; returns to Geneva, ii. 403 ;
appointed professor and minister of
the school at Geneva, ii. 322; his
death, ii. 112.
Bible, Olivetan's French, i. 226 ; Cal-
vin edits, ib. ; later editions of, i.
228 ; Castellio's translation of, ib. ;
Luther's German translation of, i.
229.
Bishops, Calvin respecting, i. 371 ; the
Saxon divines respecting, i. 397.
Blandrata, ii. 246; Calvin's opinion
of, and treatise against, ii. 265.
Bolsec, Jerome, his life and character,
ii. 130; publicly attacks the doc-
trine of election, ii. 131 ; tender-
ness of the Swiss churches for, ii.
133; imprisoned, ii. 132; banished
from Geneva, ii. 136 ; revival of his
controversy with Calvin, ii. 150.
Bossuet, on Calvin's firmness of doc-
trine, i. 86.
Bourg Du, a martyr of the French
church, ii. 368.
Bourgogne De, Calvin's correspond-
ence with, i. 279; Calvin's friend-
446
INDEX.
ship with, ii. 140; his agreement
with Bolsec, ii. 141.
Brazil, French emigration to, ii.
360.
Brentius, his controversy with Laski,
ii. 346.
Bretschneider's opinion of Calvin, i.
304.
Bucer, seeks Calvin's friendship, i.
113; Calvin's opinion of, i. 114,
ii. 1 12 ; respecting church property,
i. 158; on pastoral visits, i. 445;
his hostility to Servetus, ii. 172;
his death, ii. 30, 112.
Bullinger, a favourer of religious per-
secution, ii. 210; letters from Cal-
vin to Bullinger, — on his taking up
his residence in Geneva, i. 106; on
christian unity, i. 1/4 ; on the pro-
gress of the gospel in France, ii. 1 ;
on his own consistency, ii. 77 ; on
the doctrine of the Lord's Supper,
ii. 78 ; on the hatred of the Bernese
towards himself, ii. 144; respect-
ing the religious wars, ii. 398.
Calvin, his characteristics as a man
and a reformer, — compared with
Farel and Viret, i. 108, 110; in
comparison with Luther, i. 206,
227, 241, 271, 291, 297, 280, 303,
320, 321, 432, ii. 89; in compari-
son with Melancthon, i. 207, 238 ;
in comparison with Zwingli, i. 208 ;
in comparison with Augustine, i.
211 ; in comparison with Moses, i.
353, 359 ; in comparison with Ser-
vetus, ii. 161 ; in comparison with
Vincentius of Paula, i. 421 ; his
doctrine of the Lord's Supper, i.
83, 167, 235, 242, ii. 286; on
church government, i. 84 ; con-
stancy of his belief, i. 86, 304 ; his
ability in argument, i. 122; his
opinion of Luther, i. 123 ; his opi-
nion on festivals and ceremonies, i.
134, 160,418, ii. 116; on church
discipline, i. 141, 383; on the pu-
nishment of heretics, ib. ; his con-
tempt of slander, i. 138; respect-
ing the preparation for the Lord's
Supper, i. 141, 142; on confession,
i. 141, 417 ; on faith, i. 150, 198,
508, ii. 179; his feeling of respon-
sibility as a minister, i. 154; re-
specting church property, i. 158 ;
on the Reformation in England, i.
159; respecting the diet at Hage-
nau, i. 106; his conscientiousness,
i. 167, 168; Luther's opinion of, i.
1 70 ; his love of unity and peace, i.
174, 180; respecting the contro-
versy on the Lord's Supper, i. 178 ;
his faithfulness as a christian, i.
183; energy of his faith, i. 188;
on the Scriptures, i. 188,210; his
doctrine of the Trinity, i. 189; of
angels, i. 191 ; of Satan, i. 192; of
man's original state, ib. ; of the
human soul, i. 193; of free-will, i.
193, 497; of the omnipresence of
God, ib. ; of predestination, i. 193,
203 ; of original sin, i. 194 ; of the
renewal of the Holy Ghost, i. 195 ;
of the consequences of the fall, i.
196; of conversion, ib.; of salva-
tion, i. 197 ; of good works, i. 199,
508; of election, i. 199, 201; of
damnation, i. 199 ; of infant bap-
tism, i. 204; his perfect reliance
on the Scriptures, i. 21 0 ; his belief
in the true God, ib. ; respecting
images, i. 207 ; respecting excom-
munication, ib. ; Bayle's opinion of,
i. 221 ; his knowledge of Hebrew
and Greek, i. 222 ; his exegetical
talent, i. 223, ii. 31 ; elegance and
characteristics of his style, i. 223,
431 ; his confidence in Luther, i.
237 ; his disinterestedness, i. 240 ;
considered as a poet, i. 241 ; as a
comforter, i. 242 ; on submission
to and reliance on God's will, i. 244 ;
his inward life, i. 250 ; his love of
poverty, i. 269 ; contrasts in his
character, i. 275, 277; his^pre-
eminent conscientiousness, i. 275 ;
his zeal in the cause of God, i. 276,
353; wrongly considered to be of
a melancholy or surly disposition,
i. 277 ; his sympathy for the suf-
ferings of others, i. 274 ; his bodily
ill-health, i. 280; his patience un-
der affliction, i. 283 ; the " majesty
of his character," i. 284 ; his hatred
of the enemies of God, i. 286 ; an
upholder of christian severity, ib. ;
his forgiveness of personal injuries,
i. 2^7; the three distinguishing
tendencies of his spirit, i. 289 ; his
contempt of the world, i. 294 ; free
from spiritual pride, i. 295; love
of truth the fountain of his inner
life, i. 297, 301 ; his view of mar-
tyrdom, i. 302 ; his feeling of the
constant presence of God, i. 306 ;
respecting exorcism and sorcery, i.
311; considered in his historical re-
INDEX.
447
lation to the world, i. 319 ; his im-
portance to the Reformation, i. 322 ;
respecting church property, i. 336 ;
confidence reposed in him as a po-
litician, i. 338 ; on burials, i. 343,
ii. 8 ; on theocracy, i. 349 ; as a
legislator, i. 354,358; his opinion
of synods, i. 3(5(5 ; fundamental
principles of his church polity, ib. ;
on bishops and presbyters, i. 371 ;
on the ordination of the latter, ib. ;
on the election and office of doc-
tors and preachers, i. 373 ; his view
of the claims of the church, i. 374 ;
his love of simplicity, i. 375 ; against
the observance of outward forms, i.
37 (> ; on the relationship of church
and state, i. 380, 338 ; an advocate
for aristocratical government, i.
381 ; his spirit to be contemplated
in his writings rather than in his
doings, i. 390 ; his catechisms, i.
409 ; review of, and extracts from,
i. 410; respecting congregational
singing, i. 414 ; practical tendency
of his mind, i. 423 ; his epistolary
correspondence, i. 428 ; his ac-
quaintance with Latin literature,
i. 429 ; considered as a preacher,
i. 431 ; against written sermons, i.
434 ; as a guide to salvation, i.
440; his rules for the conduct of
ministers, i. 441 ; respecting the
visitation of the sick, i. 442; on
pastoral visits, i. 445 ; on attend-
ance at public worship, ib. ; his
severity towards offenders, i. 448 ;
his exhortation to the reading of
the Scriptures, ib. ; on repentance,
i. 450 ; on steadfastness in the faith,
ib. ; against nominal Christianity, i-
462 ; on public and private worship,
i. 464 ; his praise of steadfastness
under persecution, i. 465; his skill
as a logician, i. 468; on usury, i.
469 ; on dissembling of faith, i.
4/0 ; on the lawfulness of resisting
persecution, i. 171 ; on the mar-
riage ceremony, i. 472; his opinion
of theatres, i. 473; on the salva-
tion of children dying before bap-
tism, ib. ; his general activity. 1.
475; respecting the papal autho-
rity, i. 478; on free-will, i. 497;
on regeneration by baptism, i. 507 ;
his hatred of dissimulation, ii. 8;
his opinion of Luther, ii. 16, 18;
his magnanimity, ii. 20j his inward
life, ii. 31 ; his methodical unity of
thought, ii. 32; his resolution, ii.
69; his consolation in friendship,
ii. 7'^; his desire of unity in the
church, ii. 76, 294 ; his doctrine of
predestination, ii. 94 ; Luther's
opinion of, ii. .97 ; the world's opi-
nion of, ii. 103 ; his various bio-
graphers, i. 300, ii. 107; his un-
failing perseverance, ii. 30(5 ; his
politics, ii. 406 ; his opposition to
religious war, ii. 409 ; on justifica-
tion, ii. 413; on heresy, ii. 417;
his patience under affliction, ii. 422.
Calvin, his birth, i. 1 ; his parents and
childhood, i. 21 ; his personal ap-
pearance, ib. ; educated with the
children of the noble family of Mom-
mor, i. 22 ; obtains an appointment
in his twelfth year in the Chapelle
de la Gesine, i. 23 ; becomes a pu-
pil in the high school of Paris, ib. ;
receives the living of Marteville, i.
24 ; changes the parish of Marte-
ville for that of Pont l'Eveque, ib. ;
engages in the study of the law, j'Z>. ;
loses his father in his youth, i. 25 ;
becomes acquainted with Melchior
Woolmar, i. 26 ; obtains the degree
of doctor, i. 2/ ; his conversion to
the reformed faith, i. 29 ; compared
with Luther's, ib.; its sincerity, i.30;
his own account of the same, i. 31 ;
he publishes the two books of Se-
neca de Clementia, with a commen-
tary, i. 33; peril attending the
publication of this work, i. 35 ; con-
tents of the commentary, ib.; flies
from Paris, i. 37 ; protected by the
queen of Navarre, ib. ; returns to
Paris, i. 38 ; publishes his work
entitled ' Psyehopannyehia,' i. 39 ;
visits Strasbourg, i. 40 ; becomes
acquainted with thejGerman reform-
ers, ib. ; projects the conversion of
Francis I., 48 ; his opposition to the
Anabaptists, i. 40 ; publishes the
' Institutio,' i. 53; preface to the
same, ib. ; its origin and design, i.
69, 180; resides at Basel, i. 99;
visits Ferrara, i. 100; returns to
bid farewell to his country, ib.} be-
comes preacher and teacher of theo-
logy at Geneva, i. 105 ; his friend-
ship with Fare] and Viret, i. 106;
translates into Latin the first CJeue-
vese catechism, i. 112; his disputes
with Caroli, i. 114, 161 ; his works
'De fugienda Idolatria' and 'De
Papisticis Sacerdotiis vel admini-
448
INDEX.
strandis vel abjiciendis,' i. 118; con-
tents of, and extracts from same,
ib. ; attempts to establish strict dis-
cipline in Geneva, i. 125; meets
with much opposition, ib. ; refuses
the sacrament of the Lord's Supper
to the Genevese, i. 127 ; banished
from their city, i. 128 ; lives at
Strasburg, i.135 ; appointed lecturer
and preacher there, i. 140 ; defends
the Reformation against Sadolet,
i. 148 ; present at the convention
in Frankfort, i. 155; respecting the
diet at Hagenau, i. 166; his work
* De Ccena,' i. 175 ; contents of, and
extracts from same, i.l 76; publishes
a commentary on the Epistle to the
Romans, i, 218; dedicated to Gry-
naeus, ib. ; edits Olivetan's French
Bible, i. 226; his opinion of the
Catholic disputants at the diet of
Worms, i. 232 ; sent to Worms by
the people of Strasburg, i. 234 ;
forms an intimate friendship with
Melancthon, ib.; confutes Robertus
Moshamus, Dean of Passau, at
Worms, ib.; obtains the title of
" the Theologian," i. 235 ; tempo-
rary coldness between him and Me-
lancthon, i. 239 ; his triumphal song
(Epinicion), i. 241 ; the Genevese
desire his return, i. 246 ; unwilling-
ness of the people of Strasburg that
he should leave them, i. 247; de-
cides on returning to Geneva, i. 252;
his reception there, i. 255 ; his do-
mestic affairs, i. 257 ; his poverty,
ib. ; his marriage, i. 263 ; Luther's
marriage compared with his, ib. ;
his opinion of his wife, i. 264 ; on
the birth and death of his only son,
i. 265 ; on the death of his wife, i.
266 ; his house at Geneva, i. 330 ;
his first address to the Genevese
after his recall, i. 331 ; establishes
a court of morals in Geneva, i. 332 ;
his position in Geneva, i. 346 ; uni-
versal worth of his church discipline,
i. 365 ; the dedications of his works,
i. 423 ; his pastoral labours, i. 425 ;
his bodily ill-health, i. 280, 427;
his lectures on the book of Job, i.
435 ; extracts from, i. 436 ; reproof
given by him to a licentious com-
munity, i. 457; to a community
under persecution, i. 453; to one
suffering domestic persecution, i.
455 ; letters to persecuted converts,
j. 467 ; writes against Pclagianism,
i. 489; extracts from the work, i.
493 ; writes against the council of
Trent, i. 501 ; extracts from the
work, i. 502; his writings against
the Nicodemites, ii. 8 ; his apology
to same, ii. 9 ; letter from Melanc-
thon to, ii. 13 ; writes against the
Interim, ii. 27 ; his disputes with
Castellio, ii. 34, 155 ; his works
against relics and astrology, ii. 37 ;
against the Anabaptists and liber-
tines, ii. 42 ; his controversies with
Perrini, ii. 62 ; respecting the pro-
ceedings of Gruet, ii. 68; insults
heaped on him on account of Gruet's
death, ii. 69 ; his friendship for Vi-
ret, ii. 74 ; signs the Consensus Ti-
gurinus,ii. 81 ; publishes a commen-
tary on the Epistles, ii. 109 ; dedi-
cates it to Edward VI. of England,
ib. ; letter from Melancthon to, ii.
113; his work ' De Scandalis,' ii.
117; its contents, ii, 1 18 ; his con-
troversy with George Siculus, ii.
1 29 ; holds a public disputation
with Bolsec, ii. 32 ; his controversy
with Troillet, ii. 138; his friend-
ship for Farel and Jacques de Bour-
gogne, ii. 140 ; hostility of the Ber-
nese towards, ii. 143 ; his appeal to
the council of Bern, ii. 1^5; re-
newal of his dispute with Bolsec, ii.
150; his work 'Consensus Pasto-
rum,' ii. 151 ; his correspondence
with Servetus, ii. 179; his conduct
towards Servetus at Geneva, ii. 193;
his controversy with Servetus whilst
a prisoner at Geneva, ii. 199; let-
ter from Farel to, ii. 210; letter
from Bullingerto, ii. 216; his part
in the execution of Servetus, ii. 224,
2'2S ; his work against the latter, ii.
24 1 ; writes a treatise against Blan-
drata, ii. 265 ; his controversy with
Gentilis, ii. 271 ; his controversy
with Westphal on the doctrine of
the sacrament, ii. 274 ; analysis of
his work against Westphal, ii. 280 ;
second and third works against
Westphal, ii. 284 ; his correspond-
ence with Melancthon, ii. 295 ; his
controversy with Hesshus, ii. 296 ;
his uneasiness respecting the church
at Strasburg, ii. 304 ; publishes a
commentary on St. John, ii. 306 ;
his contest with Berthelier, ii. 307 ;
personally insulted by his enemies
at Geneva, ii. 312; visits Frankfort,
ii. 337 ; disputes with Justus Wei-
INDEX.
449
sins on free-will, ii. 338 ; his relation
to the Northern churches, ii. 340 ;
corresponds with Gustavus Vasa,
king of Sweden, ib. ; writes against
Menno Simon, ib. ; his influence in
Poland, ii. 341 ; his letters to the
Poles, ii. 342, 344 ; respecting the
papal authority, ii. 343; his address
to believers about to suffer mar-
tyrdom, ii. 35G, 359 ; his influence
in France, ii. 374 ; his correspond-
ence with the king of Navarre, ii.
376 ; obtains money for the latter,
ib. ; dedication of his commentary
on the four books of Moses to
Henry IV. ii. 378; his opinion of the
colloquy at Poissy, ii. 386 ; sends
to the emperor Ferdinand a con-
fession of the French reformed
church, ii. 400 ; preaches at Cham-
bery, ii. 405 ; opposes the conspi-
racy of Amboise, ii. 408 ; his dis-
pute with Balduin, ii. 411; writes
against Cassander's project of re-
ligious union, ii. 412; his last lite-
rary and controversial labours, ii.
422 ; his last illness, ii. 421 ; Beza's
account of, ii. 422 ; his will, ii. 425 ;
his dying address to the council of
Geneva, ii. 426 ; to the ministers,
ii. 429 ; his last hours and death,
ii. 430, 432 ; his character by Beza,
ii. 433.
Calvinism, its influence on England
and Germany, i. 327, 328.
Caraccioli, Marquis of Vico, his life
and character, ii. 129 ; his persecu-
tion, ii. 130.
Caroli, his life and dispute with Calvin,
i. 114; his last appearance at Metz,
i. 341 ; challenges Farel to a pub-
lic disputation, i. 342.
Cassander projects a union of reli-
gious parties, ii. 411; Calvin writes
against, ii. 412.
Castellio, resides with Calvin, i. 257 ;
his character, life and writings, ii.
33, 36 ; disputes with Calvin, ii. 34,
155 ; Montaigne's opinion of, ii. 37;
becomes a teacher in the school at
Geneva, ii. 33; writes anonymously
against the doctrine of election, ii.
36.
Catechism, the first Gencvese, drawn
up by Calvin and Farel, i. 112.
Catholic church, the constitution of,
i. 417.
Chaponneau, Calvin's controversy
with, ii. 33.
VOL. II.
Charles, the Emperor, convokes the
diets of Worms and Ratisbon, i.
230 ; seeks to unite religious par-
ties, i. 232 ; admonition from Alex-
ander Farnese to, i. 480 ; Calvin's
counter-address to, i. 481 ; Luther's
address on the triple defence of the
papacy, i. 486.
Charles IX. ascends the throne of
France, ii. 370; his letter to the
council of Geneva, ii. 372.
Chemminus, letters from Calvin to, i.
25, 28.
Christ, Servetus on the humanity and
eternity of, ii. 254, 256.
Church, the, Calvin on the govern-
ment of, i. 84, 204 ; controversy re-
specting church property in Geneva,
i. 335 ; on the jurisdiction of, i.
376; great simplicity of the ser-
vice in the reformed, i. 375 ; its re-
lation to the state, i. 380 ; the pri-
mitive, compared with the Calvinis-
tic, i. 395; polity of the English, i.
400 ; the constitution of the Catho-
lic, i. 417; Calvin's and Bullinger's
wish for unity in, ii. 124, 125, 126.
Coligni, Admiral, heads the Reforma-
tion in France, ii. 369 ; letters from
Calvin to, ii. 362; letters to the
wife of, i. 283.
Commentaries by Calvin on the old
and new Testaments, i. 218, 435, ii.
109, 306.
Confession, Calvin on, i. 141 ; Luther,
Calvin and Wesley on, i. 417; con-
fessions of the French church, i.
408 ; the Helvetic, i. 407.
Conde, forms an evangelical union at
Orleans, ii. 397 ; taken prisoner at
the battle of Dreux, ii. 401 ; con-
cludes a peace with the Catholics,
ii. 402; letter from Calvin to, ii.
403.
Conscience, liberty of, i. 405.
Consensus Tigurinus, the, discussion
respecting, ii. 80 ; letters from Cal-
vin respecting, ii. 80, 81 ; generally
received by the reformed churches,
ii. 83.
Consistory, the, its office and powers
as established by Calvin, i. 385.
Contarini, Cardinal, at the diet of Ra-
tisbon, i. 231.
Conversion, Calvin's doctrine of, i.
196; Augustine's doctrine of, i.
205.
Cop, Nicolas, rector of the Sorbonne
in Paris, i. 37.
2g
450
INDEX.
Coraud, Calvin's letters on the death
^ of,i. 139.
Cordier, Matnrinus, establishes a
school in Geneva, i. 335.
Cranmer, letter from Calvin respect-
ing the unity of the church to, ii.
125.
Creation, the, Servetus respecting, ii.
250.
Damnation, Calvin's and the refor-
mers' doctrine of, i. 199, 201.
Daniel, Francis, letters from Calvin
to, i. 17,27,34, 113.
Dedications of Calvin's works, i. 423,
ii. 32.
Demoniacal possession, instance of, i.
310.
Denmark, the Reformation in, ii. 31 .
Diets of Worms and Ratisbon, i. 230,
236.
Discipline, church, i. 360; Calvin's
system of, i. 369, 383.
Dreux, the battle of, ii. 401 ; Beza's
conduct at, ib.
Edward, king of England, dedications
of Calvin's works to, ii. 30; his
death, ii. 311.
Election, Calvin's doctrine of, i. 199,
.201, 212; mystery of, i. 215; in-
completely comprehended by Cal-
vin, ib. ; Bolsec's doctrine of, ii.
132; views at Basel and Bern re-
specting, ii. 133.
England, state of its church in 1509-
1530, i. 3; influence of Calvinism
on, i. 327 ; church polity of, i. 400 ;
progress of the Reformation in, ii.
28 ; persecution in, ii. 355.
Eutychianism, the Lutherans accused
of, i. 207.
Epistolary correspondence, Calvin's, i.
428; characteristics of, i. 429.
Excommunication, the doctrine of, i.
79 ; Calvin respecting, i. 377 ; Bern
repudiates the practice of, ii. 325 ;
moral effect of, i. 394.
Faber, Peter, letter from Calvin to, i.
292.
Faith, Calvin's doctrine of, i. 198;
Servetus' doctrine of, ii. 245, 247.
Fall, the, Calvin on the consequences
of, i. 196.
Farel, commences the Reformation in
Geneva, i. 94 ; persecuted by the
clergy of that place, ib. ; holds a
public disputation with Guy Furbity,
i. 96 ; narrowly escapes being poi-
soned, ib. ; retains Calvin at Ge-
neva, i. 105 ; his true friendship for
Calvin, i. 107, 252; his strict disci-
pline, i. 112; Calvin's reverence for,
i. 252 ; commences the Reformation
in Metz, i. 339 ; his desire of unity
in the church, ii. 88; his favourable
opinion of the Augsburg confession,
ib.; Calvin's friendship for, ii. 140; a
favourer of religious persecution, ii.
210; summoned before the council
of Geneva, ii. 310 ; his marriage, ii.
321 ; letter from Beaulieu to, ii.
373; letters from Calvin to Farel,
i. 107, 131 ; on church property, i.
158, 160; on his controversy with
Caroli, i. 162, 165 ; respecting the
Zurichers and Zwingli, i. 171 ; on
the general affairs of Geneva, i.
1 73 ; on the theological discussion
at Ratisbon, i. 236 ; on the conflicts
of his own spirit, i. 251, 253; on
his marriage, i. 264 ; on the death
of his wife, i. 267 ; on the govern-
ment of the Genevese church, i.
332; his projected reformation of
Metz, i. 339 ; his dispute with Cas-
tellio, ii. 35 ; with Perrin, ii. 60 ;
respecting Servetus, ii. 195 ; on the
persecution in France, ii. 361.
Farnese, Alexander, his acts and cha-
racter, i. 480; Calvin's writings
against, i. 482.
Fathers, the primitive, clemency of, i.
379.
Ferrara, the duchess of, history of, i.
9, 11 ; Calvin at her court, "i. 102 ;
her regard for Calvin, ib. ; letters
from Calvin to, — on her steadfast-
ness against temptation, i. 103, 313;
on faithfulness to the truth, i. 450,
ii. 374,375; letters from the duchess
to Calvin, ii. 402, 404.
Festivals of the church in Geneva, ii.
115.
France, characteristics of, i. 19 ; first
reformed congregation at Meaux, i.
15; first martyrs of the Reformation
in, i. 15; synodal form of govern-
ment of the church of, i. 389 ; spi-
ritual libertinism in, ii. 46; opinion
respecting Calvin in, ii. 106; let-
ters from Calvin to the martyrs of,
ii. 356, 359 ; the Reformation and
persecution in, ii. 353, 354 ; first
French religious war, ii. 396; the
synod at Orleans, ii. 398.
Francis I. of France, character of, i.
INDEX.
451
48; compared with Calvin, i. 53;
Beza's opinion of, i. 7 ; a favourer of
learning, i. 12; persecutes the Pro-
testants, i. 50; Calvin dedicates his
' Institutes' to, i. 53.
Francis II. of France, short reign and
death, ii. 366, 3/0 ; persecution of
the Lutherans, ii. 367.
Freedom of conscience, favourers of,
^ ii. 242.
Free-will, doctrine of, Calvin's, i. 193,
497; remarks on, i. 214.
Funeral service, the, Calvin's view of,
ii. 8.
Galiffe's life of Calvin, ii. 107.
Gallars, is sent by Calvin to London,
ii. 334.
Geneva, brief history of, i. 91 ; rise
of the Reformation in, i. 94 ; the
authority of the papacy set aside in,
i. 97; blockaded by the duke of
Saxony, ib. ; bad state of morals in,
i. 99, 125, ii. 48 ; disturbances in,
i. 127, 134, ii. 311 ; Calvin's letters
to the Genevese in his exile, i. 145 ;
the Genevese earnestly desire Cal-
vin's return to, i. 246 ; day of pub-
lic penitence in, i. 331 ; establish-
ment of a court of morals in, i. 332 ;
its dispute with the Bernese, i. 338,
ii. 144 ; the plague breaks out in, i.
344 ; Calvin's position in, i. 346 ;
theocratic constitution of, i. 351 ;
political constitution of, i. 353;
the practice of torture retained in,
i. 364 ; the Genevese confession
of faith, i. 407 ; the libertines in,
ii. 47 ; French refugees in, ii. 55 ;
Infectionists in, ii. 50 ; festivals of
the church abolished in, ii. 115;
disputes respecting discipline, ii.
315; Calvin founds a school in,
ii. 321.
Gentilis, Valentin, Calvin's opinion of,
ii. 266; his doctrine of the Trinity,
ii. 267; tried and condemned at
Geneva, ii. 267, 268 ; retracts his
opinions, ii. 269 ; set at liberty, ib.;
persecuted at Bern, ii. 270 ; con-
demned and executed, ii. 271.
Georgii, David, intercedes for Serve-
tus, ii. 212.
Germany, the Protestant princes of,
intercede with the king of France
m behalf of the reformers, i. 237 ;
influence of Calvinism on, i. .">2S ;
its religious state considered, in a
letter from Calvin to Mvconius, i.
337; religious war in, ii. 19; oppo-
sition to the Interim, ii. 25, 26.
Grace, Calvin's doctrine of, i. 197.
Gribaldi, Matthseus, exiled from Ge-
neva, ii. 263 ; from Bern, ii. 264.
Grotius's opinion of Calvin, i. 315.
Gruet, writes against Christianity, ii.
47 ; he libels Calvin, ii. 64 ; is pro-
secuted and condemned to death by
the state of Geneva, ii. 66.
Grynaeus, Simon, a friend of Calvin's,
i. 40 ; Calvin dedicates to him his
commentary on the Epistle to the
Romans, i. 218; letter from Calvin
to, i. 117-
Guise, the duke of, persecutes the
Protestants, ii. 396 ; takes Rouen
by storm, ii. 400 ; is assassinated at
Orleans, ii. 402.
Hagenau, the diet at, i. 166.
Helvetic confession, the, i. 407.
Henry VIII. of England, defends the
doctrine of the seven sacraments
against Luther, i. 3 ; is divorced
from queen Catherine and declared
head and defender of the church of
England in the place of the Pope,
i. 4 ; Calvin's opinion of his divorce,
i. 5 ; of his title of head of the
church, i. 39.
Henry II. of France, persecutes the
Protestants, ii. 358, 362 ; his death,
ii. 366.
Henry IV. of France, departs from the
truth, i. 67 ; assassinated, i. 6S ; Cal-
vin's dedications to the same, ii. 378.
Heresy, Calvin's explanation of, ii.417.
Heretics, on the punishment of, ii. 240.
Hesshus, Calvin's writings against,
ii. 297.
Idelette de Bures, Calvin's marriage
with, i. 263 ; character of, ib.
Images, Calvin respecting the use of,
i. 207.
Infectionists in Geneva, ii. 50.
Innocency of man, Calvin on the ori-
ginal, i". 192.
Inquisition, the, its secret proceedings
in Italy, i. 1<>.
'Institutes,' Calvin's, their origin, 1.
69; contents, i. 7'2 ; design, i. 180,
187; analysis of, i. 186; their per-
spicuity, i. 209; usefulness, ib. ;
preface to the last edition, i. 85 ;
the Strasburg edition, i. 182; the
translations of, i. 185; opponents
of. ib.
2 G 2
452
INDEX.
Interim in Germany, ii. 25, 26 ; Pro-
testants and Catholics discontented
with, ii: 2/; Calvin writes against,
ib.
Italy, at the time of the Reformation,
i. 6 ; Protestant congregations in,
i. 10. k e
Jesus as a mediator, i. 449.
Job, the book of, Calvin's lectures on,
i. 436.
Julius III., Pope, character of, ii. 108.
Justification, Calvin's doctrine of, i.
5 1 0, ii. 413; Servetus's doctrine of,
ii. 245, 257 ; difference of the views
of the reformers and Servetus re-
specting, ii. 260 ; Stancarus and
Osiander respecting, ii. 273.
Knox, John, characteristics of, ii. o27;
becomes a preacher at Frankfort and
Geneva, ii. 328; political writings
of, ii. 330; brings Calvin's discipline
into Scotland, ii. 331 ; opposes
Queen Mary, ii. 332 ; letter to
Locke on the affairs of Geneva
from, ii. 318.
Krell, Nicolaus, trial and execution of,
ii. 23S.
Krummacher on Calvin's character,
i. 184.
Labori, letter to his wife, ii. 356.
Laski, banished with his congregation
from England, ii. 277 ', endeavours
to unite the Protestant churches,
ii. 337 ; appointed chief superin-
tendent of the Protestant churches
in Lesser Poland, ii. 347 ; Calvin's
opinion of, ii. 348.
Lasmanini, ii. 347, 348.
Leclerc, John, the first martyr of the
Reformation, i. 15.
Leftwre d'Etaples, life and acts of,i.l3.
Legrant, letter from Calvin to, i. 467.
Libertines, spiritual, Calvin writes
against, ii. 42; pantheistic doc-
trines of, ib. ; in France, ii. 46 ; in
Geneva, ii. 47 ; political libertines,
ii. 53; their opposition to Calvin
and persecution of the exiles, ii. 5'A,
5 1 ; trials of Ameaux, Perrin and
Gruet, ii. 57, 62, 65.
liturgy, principles of Calvin's, i. 412.
Longueville, the duke of, letter from
Calvin to, i. 466.
Lord's Supper, the, Calvin's doctrine
of, i. 83, 111, 176,342, ii. 78, 79,
Si ), 90, 285 ; Calvin on the prepa-
ration for, i. 142; the agreement
of Calvin and Melancthon respect-
ing, i. 155; Calvin in reference to
the controversy on, i. 178 ; Calvin's
and Luther's different views of, i.
207; the Calvinistic form of, i.
412; Calvin on the administration
of, to the sick, i. 443 ; on the fre-
quency of its celebration, i. 444 ;
on its administration under both
forms to the laity, i. 477 ; the opi-
nions of the reformers respecting,
i. 167 ; precepts for the celebra-
tion of, i. 385 ; the doctrine of the
Lord's Supper set forth in the Con-
sensus Tigurinus, ii. 82 ; history of
the strife respecting, ii. 14, 89 ;
Luther's doctrine of, ii. 90; Cal-
vin's controversy with Westphal
and Hesshus on, ii. 274-292 ;
Calvin's correspondence with Me-
lancthon on, ii. 295 ; Beza at the
colloquv at Poissy respecting, ii.
385.
Lorrain, cardinal of, at the colloquy
at Poissy, ii. 383, 392.
Louis XII. resists the papal preten-
sions, i. 11; refuses to persecute
the Waldenses, i. 12.
Louis XIV. opposes the Reformation,
i. 68.
Lovola founds the order of the Jesuits,
i*. 226.
Luther, condemned by the Sorbonne
as a heretic, i. 14; the rapid spread
of his writings, i. 10; his doctrine
of the Lord's Supper, i. 173; com-
pared with Calvin, i. 206, ii. 89 ;
Calvin's confidence in, i. 237 :
compared with Calvin in respect to
his marriage, i. 263 ; as a married
pastor, ib. ; his disinterestedness
and contempt of wealth, i. 274 ; in
conversation, i. 280; his weakness in
the struggles of the faith, i. 304 ; his
love of nature, i. 307; his view of the
works of the devil, i. 308 ; his fear of
the plague, i. 345 ; on church polity,
i. 397 ; on congregational singing,
i. 415; his address to Charles V.
on the triple defence of the papacy,
i. 48(5; defended by Calvin against
Pighius, i. 493; letter from Cal-
vin to, ii. 11 ; his dispute with the
Swiss, ii. 14 ; Calvin's opinion of,
ii. 16, 18; Zwingli's opinion of, ii.
18 ; his opinion of Calvin, ii. 97 ; his
opinions on toleration, ii. 236 ; his
will compared with Calvin's, ii. 426.
INDEX.
453
Macaire, letter from Calvin to, i. 278.
Man, the original nature of, i. 192.
Margaret, queen of Navarre, favours
the Reformation, i. 13 ; her life and
character, ib. ; her strife with the
Sorbonne, and Calvin's judgement
thereon, ii. 1(5, 1/.
Marriage-ceremony, Calvin on the
celebration of the, i. 472.
Martyr, Peter, on the intellectual
state of Italy at the time of the Re-
formation, i. / ; takes part in the
Reformation of England, ii. 28 ; his
character, ii. 86 j Calvin's opinion
of, ib. ; his opinion of Servetus, ii.
234 ; respecting the church at Stras-
burg, ii. 30-1 ; at the colloquy at
Poissy, ii. 390 ; letter from Calvin
on the union of the faithful in Christ
to, ii. 125 ; letter to Calvin on the
state of England from, ii. 313.
Martyrs, of the French church, i. 50,
ii. 6, 355, 361 ; Calvin respecting
martyrdom, i. 302 ; martyrs of the
church of Meaux, ii. 6 ; of the En-
glish church, ii. 355 ; letters from
Calvin to, ii. 356, 359, 363.
Mathesius, on the state of the Ger-
man church, i. 1 ; on Luther at the
diet of Worms, i. 233 ; on Luther's
struggles of faith, i. 303, 304 ; on
Luther's love of nature, i. 307.
Maurice, Prince, establishes the Cal-
vinistic church in Holland, i. 327 ;
protests against the Tridentine sy-
nod, ii. Ill ; his manifesto, ii. 113.
Meaux, persecution of the church of,
ii. 5.
Melancthon, converses with Calvin at
Frankfort, i. 156; Calvin's opinion
of, i. 160, 240, ii. Ill; forms an
intimate acquaintance with Calvin
at Worms, i. 234 ; compared with
Calvin and Luther, i. 238 ; his re-
presentation of the church, i. 396 ;
his view of the doctrine of predes-
tination, i. 499; on the Consensus
Tigurinus, ii. S3; his doctrine of
the Lord's Supper, ii. 90; favour-
able to the execution of Servetus,
ii. 233; his correspondence with
Calvin, ii. 295 ; his death, ii. 296.
Mcnno, Simon, Calvin writes against,
ii. 240.
Metz,Farel invited by the Protestants
to, i. 33!).
Ministers of the gospel, respect to be
shown to, i. 1 15.
Mompelgarten, church of, i. 342.
Morals, a court of, established in
Geneva, i. 332.
More, Thomas, a promoter of the Re-
formation, i. 4.
Morns, his opinion of Calvin, i. 294.
Motte, De la, Alciat, accused of heresy
and banished from Geneva, ii. 271.
Myconius, letters to, from Calvin on
discipline, i. 333 ; on the affairs of
Germany, i. 337.
Navarre, Calvin writes to the queen of,
respecting the libertines, ii. 46 ; the
king of Navarre favours the French
Reformation, ii. 362.
Nestorianism, the Calvinists accused
of, i. 207.
Netherlands, the, persecution in, i. 238.
Nicodemites, the, Calvin's ' Apology '
to, ii. 9.
Normandie, Laurence de, Calvin de-
dicates the treatise ' de Scandalis'
to, ii. 118.
Ochin, Bernardin, of Sienna, Calvin's
favourable opinion of, ii. 88.
GLcolampadius holds a discussion with
Servetus, ii. 171.
Olivetan's French translation of the
Bible, i. 227.
Original sin, Calvin's doctrine of, i.
194; Servetus's, ii. 245; compa-
rison of the views of the Protestant
and Roman theologians respecting,
i. 491 ; views of the council of
Trent respecting, i. 506; Calvin's
opposition to, i. 507.
Orleans, the synod at, ii. 398.
Osiander, heresies of, ii. 273.
Papal authority, Calvin's view of, i.
478.
Parental authority earnestly defended
by the reformers, i. 36 1 .
Pareus, Nicolaus, letter from Calvin
to, i. 252.
Pastoral letters, Calvin's, to perse-
cuted christians, i. 451, 453, 455,
467 ; to a waverer, i. 454 ; to an
ill-disciplined community, i. 457;
to an exile, i. 461 ; to reformed
congregations, i. 463,4(55; to the
duke of Longueville, i. 466 ; to
Legrant, i. 467; to the brethren
at Aix, i. 171.
Paul III., character of, i. 480; his
admonition to Charles V., ib. • Cal-
vin's answer, i. 48] ; his death, ii.
108.
454
INDEX.
Pelagianism of the Romish church, i.
489.
Perrini, Ami, head of the libertines in
Geneva, ii. 60 ; Calvin's friendship
for, and subsequent disputes with,
ii. 62 ; their reconciliation, ii. 63.
Persecution in France, i. 15, 238, ii.
353; in England, i. 238, ii. 355;
in the Netherlands, i. 238 ; Calvin
on the lawfulness of forcibly re-
sisting, i. 471.
Philosophy, Servetus on, ii. 246.
Pighius, a defender of the Romish
church, i. 89; Calvin's writings
against, i. 492, ii. 95 ; letters from
Calvin to, i. 138, 143.
Plague, the, in Geneva, i. 343 ; Cal-
vin and Luther compared in re-
spect to their fear of, i. 345.
Planck, his opinion of Calvin, i. 168;
on the Consensus Tigurinus, ii. 181.
Poetrv, in relation to the Reformation,
i. 416.
Poissy, the colloquy at, ii. 380, 384 ;
its results, ii. 392.
Poland, the Reformation in, ii. 341 ;
Calvin in respect to, ii. 342; Cal-
vin's letters to the Poles, ib.
Predestination, Calvin's doctrine of,
i. 193, 203, ii. 94 ; Zwingli's doc-
trine of, i. 209 ; the controversy on,
ii. 133 ; the Bernese theologians
respecting, ii. 134 ; Calvin's dispute
with Castellio respecting, ii. 156 ;
Beza writes against Castellio in de-
fence of, ii. - 156 5 Wesley's opposi-
tion to the doctrine of, ii. 158.
Presbyters, Calvin respecting, i. 3/1.
Protestant church, the, accused by
the Roman Catholics on account of
the execution of Servetus, ii. 227 .
Psalms, the, translations of, i. 414 ;
old French version of, i. 415.
Psychopannychia, or, the sleep of the
soul, Calvin's, i. 39 ; review of, and
extracts from, i. 42.
Public worship, Calvin on attendance
at, i. 445.
Purgatory, Calvin's doctrine of, i. 51 1 ;
Servetus's notion of, ii. 261.
llatisbon, the diet of, i. 231 ; inutility
of, i. 236.
Redemption, Servetus on, ii. 245.
Reformation, the, first public acknow-
ledgment of, in Geneva, i. 113 ;
the development of art and poetry
affected by, i. 416.
Reformed churches, the, desire that
Servetus should be punished, ii.
213 ; intolerance of, ii. 23/ ; the
Calvinistic compared with the Lu-
theran, i. 222.
Reformers, the, unimaginativeness of,
i. 306 ; their imperfect resignation,
i. 307 ; extreme severity of, i. 360 ;
their love of simplicity,* i. 375 ; ge-
neral review of the European, ii. 87.
Regeneration by baptism, Calvin's
doctrine of, i. 507.
Relics, Calvin's work against, ii. 37-
Renata, vide Ferrara.
Richebourg, Louis, death of, i. 242 ;
letter of condolence from Calvin to
his father, ib.
Riviere, De la, founds a Protestant
church in Paris, ii. 357.
Sacrament, vide Lord's Supper.
Sadolet, his character as a Catholic, i.
147 ; his address to the Genevese,
ib. ; Calvin's answer to, i. 148.
Saints, the worship of, i. 419.
Salvation, Calvin's doctrine of, i. 197.
Satan, Calvin respecting, i. 192.
Schools established by the reformers,
i. 335.
Scriptures, the, internal evidence of
their truth, i. 188 ; Calvin's idea of
their inspiration, ib. ; Calvin's per-
fect reliance on, i. 210; various ex-
positors of, i. 219; Calvin's expo-
sition of, i. 221.
Sermons, style of Calvin's, i. 433.
Servetus, his first conference with
Calvin, i. 38 ; his doctrine of the
Trinity, i. 190; wishes to form a
league with Calvin, ii. 75 ; com-
pared with Calvin, ii. 161 ; Mo-
sheim's opinion of, ii. 164 ; his
history, ii. 165; progress of his
religious opinions, ii. 167 ; writes
respecting the Trinity, ii. 169;
Zwingli's opinion of, ii. 170; visits
Basel, ii. 1/1; retracts his doctrine
at that place, ii. 1 72 ; resides in
France and Italy, ii. 173; favour-
able reception of his doctrines at
Venice, ib. ; his great talents,
ii. 174 ; lectures at Paris, ib. ;
respecting the Holy Scriptures, ii.
176; his doctrine of justification
by faith, ii. 178; his love of con-
troversy, ib. ; his correspondence
with Calvin, ii. 179; his publica-
tions at Vienne, ii. 184 ; denounced
by William Trie, ib. ; summoned
before the tribunal at Vienne, ii.
INDEX.
455
186 ; his trial, ii. 188 ; escapes from
Vienne, ii. 190; condemned in his
absence by the civil and ecclesias-
tical magistrates, ii. 191 ; resides at
Geneva, ii. 192; arrested at that
place, ib. ; his trial, ii. 194 ; dis-
putes with Calvin whilst a prisoner,
ii. 199 ; appeals to an ecclesiastical
tribunal, ii. 202; violence of his con-
duct, ii.210; severity of the churches
respecting, ii. 213; his liberality
of opinion, ii. 230 ; condemned to
death, ii. 215 ; his reception of his
sentence, ii. 217; his last hours,
ib. ; becomes reconciled to Cfdvin,
ii. 218; his character, ii. 229; as
a theologian : — on faith, ii. 245,
247 ; on the Trinity, ii. 245-248;
redemption and justification, ii.
257 ; original sin, ib. ; infant bap-
tism, ii. 246; rejects all the com-
monly received views of Christi-
anity, ib. ; as a philosopher, ib. ; on
the omniscience of God, ii. 247 ;
his favourable opinion of Irenseus,
ii. 249 ; his doctrine of the Tri-
nity Tritheism, ib. ; respecting the
creation of the universe, ii. 250 ;
his platonic idea of God, ii. 251 ;
his natural theology, ii. 253 ; supe-
riority to Spinoza, ib. ; on the fall
of man, ii. 254 ; respecting Christ's
humanity, ib. ; on Christ's eternity,
ii. 256 ; on the doctrine of the Holy
Ghost, ib. ; on free-mil, ii. 258 ;
his view of the means of grace, ii.
260 ; on the future state, ii. 261 ;
his character in respect to his reli-
gious doctrines, ii. 262.
Siculus, George, Calvin's dispute with,
ii. 128.
Sigismund, king of Poland, Calvin
proposes a form of church govern-
ment to, i. 401 ; dedicates his com-
mentary on the Hebrews to, ii. 31.
Sin, vide Original sin.
Singing, Calvin's view of congrega-
tional, i. 414.
Smalclade, league of, ii. 20.
Socinus, Laelius, Calvin's opinion of,
ii. 88; creates a disturbance amongst
the reformed, ii. 349; recommended
by Calvin to the Poles, ib.
Somerset, the duke of, letter from
Calvin on church government to, i.
402 ; on written sermons, i. 434 ;
on the fanatics in England, ii. 29.
Sorbonne, the, history of, i. 479 ;
Calvin writes against, i. 477.
Soul, Calvin respecting the human,
i. 193.
Spifame, Jac. de, sent to the diet at
Frankfort by the Protestants, ii.
400.
Spina, Johannes von, a friend of Cal-
vin's, i. 314.
Stancarus, Francis, life and heresies
of, ii. 272.
State, the, union of the church with,
i. 350.
Swiss, the, Luther's controversy with .
ii. 14 ; disunion of the Swiss
churches, ii. 145.
Synods, Calvin's opinion of, i. 366 ;
office and authority of, i. 392.
Tauler on povertv in a christian's life,
i. 269.
Theatres, Calvin's opinion of, i. 473.
Theocracy, i. 348; Calvin's idea of,
i. 349 ; theocratic constitution of
Geneva, i. 351 ; the theocratic ideal,
i. 365.
Tholuck on Calvin's exegetical talent,
i. 223.
Thourel, false judgement on Calvin by,
i. 299.
Tournon, Cardinal, at the colloquy of
Poissy, ii. 385.
Tradition, Calvin on scripture, ii.
412.
Transubstantiation, opinions of the
reformers on, i. 236.
Trechsel's opinion of Calvin, ii. 107.
Trent, the council of, i. 300 ; history
of, i. 501 ; Calvin's work against,
ib. ; the divines of Zurich refuse
to attend, ii. 109; Calvin's opinion
of, ib.
Tribunal, church, the Saxon divines
on, i. 398.
Trie, William, denounces Servetus at
Vienne, ii. 184, 187.
Trinity, Calvin's doctrine of, i. 189;
Servetus's doctrine of, i. 190, ii.
169, 245,248; Gentilis's doctrine
of, ii. 267.
Troillet, one of Calvin's adversaries, i.
288, ii. 138; Calvin's discussion
with, ii. 138 ; their reconciliation,
ii. 139.
Unity in the church, ii. 123; Calvin's
anxiety to establish, ii. 124, 126;
Bullinger's wish for, ii. 125.
Vergerio
348
i, his activity in Poland, ii.
456
INDEX*.
Vico, Marquis of, Caraccioli, life and
character of, ii. 129; persecution of,
ii. 130.
Vincentius of Paula, character of, i.
420 ; compared with Calvin, i. 421 ;
founds the order of the Sisters of
Mercy and the House of Lazarus,
i.,421.
Yiret, Peter, life and character of, i.
109 ; Calvin respecting the mar-
riage of, i. 261 ; Calvin's friendship
for, ii. 74 ; letters from Calvin to :
— in his banishment, L 130 ; on his
wife's sickness, i. '265 ; her death,
i. 266 ; the state of the Genevese
church, i. 335 ; respecting the
plague, i. 345 ; his discipline, ii.
61 ; opinion of Servetus, ii. /6 ; of
the Consensus Tigurinus, ii. 82.
Virgin Mary, the, worship of, i. 419.
Visitation of the sick, Calvin's view
of, i. 442.
Waldenses in Provence and Piedmont;
Calvin's opinion of, ii. 1 ; perse-
cution of, ii. 3 ; Calvin assists and
intercedes for, ii. 4; take up arms
in their own defence, ii. 371.
Welsius, Justus, disputes with Calvin
on free-will, ii. 338.
Wesley on confession, i.417 ; on co
vents, i. 421.
Westphal, Calvin's controversy with,
i. 290, ii. 275 ; Calvin's work
against, ii. 280 ; his answer to the
same, ii. 283; his doctrine of the
sacrament, ii. 286.
Witchcraft, i. 308 ; punishment of, in
Geneva, i. 363.
Wolmar, Calvin dedicates his com-
mentary on the second Epistle to
the Corinthians to, ii. 32.
Works, Calvin's doctrine respecting:,
i. 199.
Worms, the diet of, i. 230 ; theolo-
gical disputes at, i. 235 ; unfor-
tunate issue of, ii. 301.
Zurichers, the, urge Calvin to return
to Geneva, i. 253.
Zwingli, life and character of, i. 87 ;
his doctrine of the Lord's Supper,
i. 167 ; Calvin's opinion of, i. 172,
208 ; compared with Calvin, i. 208,
369, ii. 90 ; his doctrine of pre-
destination, i. 209 ; his sketch of
church polity, i. 368 ; his opinion
of Luther, ii. 18; compared with
Luther, ii. 90 ; his opinion of Ser-
vetus, ii. 170.
THE END.
PRINTED BY RICHARD AND JOHN E. TAYLOR,
RED LION COURT, FLEET STREET.
V- #
wm.
liifc
WfttRI
'm 'i
f/M'i i
1
£»
\ \ ' " !
7\l\ v.
i'liJ
tv
1 V
&