mmmmmmmmmmmmm
01
2 =
"cn
E OFE jVND
ifi0f^ftiifiiitm'rii\y \ ■; nr'niViijitji
fT?»?
mm»iiiimWi»»ai»ji»Bw>n';
Hlngrat-Bd ^rj J Coctran
THE
LIFE AND TIMES
OF THE
Rev. JOHN WESLEY, M.A.,
jTounber of tl)c iHctljobists.
BY THE
Rev. L. TYERMAN,
AUTHOR OF "THE LIFE AND TIMES OF REV. S. WESLEY, M.A.,"
{FatJier of the Revds. J. atid C. IVesley).
With an Appendix by Abel Stevens, LL.D.,
AUTHOR OF "the HISTORY OF METHODISM."
IX THREE VOLUMES.
VOL. III.
NEW YORK:
HARPER & BROTHERS, PUBLISHERS,
FRANKLIN SQUARE.
1872.
BX
V.3
971732
GENERAL CONTENTS.
VOL, III.
■1768.
PAGE
Whitefield — Berridge — Countess of Buchan — Conversation — Original
Letter by Fletcher — Yearly Collection — Wesley's first Visit to
Chatham — Methodist Jottings — Methodism in Congleton, etc. —
Wesley's Credulity-^Christian Perfection—Skirmishes before the
Battle — Wesley's Will— Rev. Thomas Adam — Fletcher of Made-
ley — Singing — Illness of Wesley's Wife — Preaching and Tradings
How to revive Religion — Witness of the Spirit — Spitalfields Chapel
— Laurence Coughlan — Methodism at Taunton, Frome, and Oxford
— Chapel Debts — Remarks on Books — Expulsion of Oxford Students
— College at Trevecca — W^esley's Publications — John Wilkes . i — 3S
1769.
Political Excitement — Whitefield — Female Preaching — Wesley in
Ireland — Hugh Saunderson — Conference of 1769 — Methodism in
America — Scheme to perpetuate Methodism — Anniversary of Tre-
vecca College — "Shepherd of Salisbury Plain" — Calvinian Con-
troversy— Wesley's Publications 39—57
1770.
—Remarks on Books — Christian Perfection— Whitefield's College in
Georgia — Riding on Horseback — Lady Glenorchy — Methodism in
Sweden — Methodism at Yeadon and Loughborough — Conference
of 1770 — Doctrinal IVIinutes — Calvinian Controversy — Death of
W^hitefield— Original Letters — Wesley's Publications — Toplady 58—83
1771.
Rev. Richard De Courcy — Sounds of coming Battle — Wesley and the
Gospel Magazine — Letter to Lady Huntingdon — Shirley's Circular
— Original Letter by Fletcher — Calvinian Controversy — Methodist
Discipline — Female Preaching — Wesley's Publications . . 84—113
1772.
Slavery — Methodism at Poplar — Correspondence with Mr. Sparrow
— Methodism at Leek and Nantwich — David Hume — Ministerial
iv General Contents.
PAGE
Responsibility — Medical Examination— Revivals in Everton and
Weardale — Conference of 1772 — Cornelius Winter — Ceaseless
Labours— National Distress and its Remedies — The Christian
Community — Calvinian Controversy — Wesley's Publications 114 — 146
1773-
American Rebellion — Wesley's proposed Successor— Methodism in
America and Antigua — Itinerancy— Chapel Debts — Wesley and his
Carriage — Wesley's Book Property — Conference of 1773 — Feast
and East Days — Communion of Saints — Calvinian Controversy
— Wesley's Publications 147 — 162
1774-
Wesley's Health — Rev. David Simpson — Methodism at Bury — Wesley
in Scotland — A Marvellous Escape — Ghosts and Witches — " The
Fool of Quality" — Wesley and an Artist — Methodism in America
and Newfoundland — Conference of 1774 — Norwich Methodism
— An Adventure — Calvinian Controversy — Wesley's Publications —
Slavery 163 — 184
<
1775-
National Excitement — American War of Independence — Death of
Peter Bohler — Wesley dangerously 111 in Ireland — Congratulations
— Giving Advice — Conference of 1775 — ^ Calvinian Controversy —
William Pine — Wesley's Publications 185 — 211
1776.
Fletcher travelling with Wesley— Dr. Coke — Enforcing Discipline —
Methodism in London — City Road Chapel — Plan of London
Circuit in 1792— London Circuit Book — Methodism at Chesterfield
— Conference of 1776 — Cantankerous Methodists — Methodism in
- the Isle of Man — Quarrelling Schoolboys — Wesley's Wife —
Wesley's Publications — Wesley's Loyalty 212 — 235
American Rebellion— Dr. Dodd— City Road Chapel— Rev. Edward
Smyth— Catastrophe at Colne— " A Snug Circuit "—"Are the
Methodists a fallen People.?"— John Hilton— Fletcher at the
Conference of 1777 — Methodism in America — Francis Asbury —
Arminian ilAzi.v?-/;/,!'- Bishop Lowth— " Strangers' Friend So-
ciety "—Rowland Hill attacks Wesley— G^^j/,?/ Magazine— Q?^'
vinian Controversy— Wesley's Publications 236—260
1778.
Thomas Maxficld— Infamous Publications— Death of Toplady—
National Alarm— Separation from the Church— Conference of
General Co7itenis.
1778 — Stationing Preachers — Mission to Africa proposed — Duncan
McAllum — John Baxter embarks for Antigua — Opening of City-
Road Chapel — Rev. James Creighton — Disciphne — Dissenters —
Silas Told — Proposals for Arminian Maoasiue—'Errata. . 261 — 285
1779.
National Alarm — Prayer and Fasting — Death of Voltaire — William
Shent in trouble — Methodism at Oldham and Padiham — The
Angel at Halifax— Methodism at Inverness — James Boswell —
Methodism at Hinckley and Coventry — Thomas Maxfield — Jea-
lousies— Charles Wesley and the London Preachers — Conference
of 1779 — Alexander McNab and Rev. Edward Smyth at Bath —
Wesley's right to Rule— Charles Wesley and McNab — Calvinian
Controversy — "Naval and Military Bible Society" — Wesley's
Pubhcations — Popery 286^317
1780.
The Protestant Association — Wesley's Letters on Popery — Rev.
Arthur O'Leary — Wesley visits Lord George Gordon — Methodism
at Delph — Wesley asks a Favour — Methodism at Pateley, Ripon,
Newark, etc. — Conference of 1780 — Separation from the Church —
Methodism in America — Letter to Bishop Lovvth — Heresy of Dr.
Watts — Rev. Brian Bury Collins — Original Letters — Oldham Street
Chapel, Manchester — Sir Harry Trelawney — Jacob Behmen —
" The Fool of Quality "—Wesley's Publications 318 — 344
1781.
Wesley's Nephews, Charles and Samuel — Wesley writing Sermons —
Samuel Bardsley and Sheffield Chapel — Methodism at Manchester
and Bolton — Molly Charlton — Methodism at Preston — Fair
weather Preachers — Re\^ William Dodwell — Sleep — Letters to
Wesley's Niece — Wesley's Nephews — Conference of 1781 — William
Hey — Death of Wesley's Wife — Letter to a Statesman — Wesley's
Pubhcations 345 — 368
1782.
Methodist Tract Society — Lovefeast at Macclesfield — Sir Walter
Scott — Conference of 1782 — Birstal Chapel Case — Rev. Thomas
Davenport — Rev. Mr. Thompson — ^John Trembath — Adam Clarke
— "The Dairyman's Daughter" — Wesley's Publications — Jacob
Behmen 369—389
1783.
Preachers forbidden to be Classleaders — Wesley ill — Trip to Hol-
' land — Kingswood School — William Black and Nova Scotia — A
Rejected Candidate — Methodism at Stafford — Wesley and the
Poor — Wesley's Publications 390-407
vi General Contents.
1784.
PAGE
A Seven Months' Journey— Morning Preaching — Itinerancy— Child-
-. ren at Stockton — Methodism at Burnley — Sunday Schools — Con-
ference of 1784— Deed of Declaration — Ordination of Preachers
for America — Two Clergymen become Dissenters — Ordination of
Preachers for Scotland, etc. — Letters on Wesley's Ordinations —
Wesley a Dissenter — Methodism at Shrewsbury — Dancing — Letter
to Hon. William Pitt — Wesley's Publications — First Race of
Methodist Preachers 408—457
1785.
William Moore— Wesley in Ireland — Spread of Methodism — Death
of Pcrronet and Fletcher — Conference of 1785 — The oldest
Methodist now living — Thomas Wride and his Colleagues at
Norwich — Separation from the Church — Wesley's Publications —
Dress 458—470
1786.
Wesley on the Wing — Scotch Methodists a distinct Church —
Methodism at Parnsley — Wesley at Sheffield and Wentworth
House — Methodism at Ilkestone — Conference of 1786 — Separation
from the Church — First Methodist Missionary Report — Proposed
Missions to India — Wesley's "Studying Hours" — Dr. Leifchild —
Wesley's Publications 471 — 489
1787.
Separation from the Church — Begging for the Poor — Revival at
Burslcm — Wesley in Ireland — A Methodist Shoemaker — Howard,
the Philanthropist — Conference of 1787 — Separation from the
- Church — Sir Robert Peel— Sunday Schools — Singing — A Coach-
load of Methodist Preachers — Visit to the Channel Islands — •
Jonathan Crowther — Antislavery Society — Joseph Entwisle and
Richard Reece — Simeon catechizing Wesley — Licensing Chapels
and Preachers — Separation from the Church — Wesley's Popularity
— Wesley's Publications — Dress — Diversions — Riches . . 490 — 520
1788.
Wesley on his Style — Sunday Schools — Prayer IMeetings— Death of
Charles Wesley — Consecration of Burial Grounds — Incidents at
Bristol — Chapel at Dumfries — Methodist Membership — A Northern
Fanatic — An Early Breakfast — Demoniacs — A Young Poetess —
Separation from the Church— End of the World— Conference of 1788
— Methodist Prayer Book— Preachers stripped of their Gown and
Bands— Dewsbury Chapel Case— John Atlay and William Eels —
Itinerancy— Wesley without a Sermon — Wesley's Publications 521 — 564
General Contents. vii
1789.
PAGE
Romney's Portrait of Wesley — Anecdotes of Wesley — Commotion
at Dublin — Separation from the Church — Rebellions — Thomas
Hanby — An Irish Dinner Party — Walter Churchey — A Session of
Methodist "Elders" — Conference of 1789 — A Conference Sermon
— Gwennap Pit — " The lovely Family at Balham " — Mount Plea-
sant Chapel, Liverpool — Methodism at Bideford — Wesley's
Publications— Wesley warning rich Methodists 565 — 596
1790.
French Revolution — A Five Months' Journey — Rev. Joseph Easter-
brook — A Three Months' Preaching Plan — Methodism at Stour-
_ port — Sunday Schools — Death of a Mocker — A Backslider Healed
— Adam Clarke — A Yorkshire Cavalcade — Separation from the
Church — Wesley's Benefactions — Wesley's Last Will — Conference
of 1790— Progress of Methodism— Ruffled Shirts— A Dublin
Revival — Christian Perfection — Wesley's last Out-door Sermon — A
Shoemaker and a Sheep Stealer— Henry Crabb Robinson — Crabbe,
the Poet — A Large Circuit — Wesley's Publications — Separation
from the Church— Rich Methodists Warned — Wesley's last
Words to the Methodists 597 — 642
1791.
Letters — Female Preaching — Wesley's last Letters— Wesley's last
Week of Public Labour — Wesley's last Letter— Wesley's last
Song on Earth — Wesley's Death— The Funeral — Proposed Monu-
ment in Westminster Abbey — Wesley's Personal Appearance,
Scholarship, Knowledge, Writings, Preaching, Companionship,
Piety, and Industry . , 643 — 660
THE LIFE AND TIMES
OF
THE REV. JOHN WESLEY, M.A.
J
1768.
DURING the year 1768, Charles Wesley, with his 1768
brother's full concurrence, removed his family from Age 65
Bristol to London, which henceforth was his place of resi-
dence.^ Whitefield spent the first half of the year in the
metropolis. In July, he set out for Scotland ; but, about a
month after, returned to London to inter his wife, who died on
August 9. His health was somewhat feeble ; but he con-
tinued to itinerate and preach to the utmost of his power.
His orphan house in America, and Lady Huntingdon's college
at Trevecca, demanded his attention, and had it. He and
Wesley were still warm hearted friends ; and yet there seems
to have been a shade of coldness come over them. Hence
the following, written when the year was closing.
"Taberuaci.e, December 2S, 1768.
" Reverend and very dear Sir, — Pray have you or I committed the
unpardonable sin, because we differ in particular cases, and act accord-
ing to our consciences ? I imagine the common salvation is not promoted
by keeping at such a distance. Enemies rejoice. Halfway friends espe-
cially are pleased.
" You will be glad to hear, that the time for completing the orphan
house affair seems to be come. Do you know of a good, judicious,
spiritual tutor? Will you, without delay, make the first present of your
works to the library ? I hope we shall have a nursery for true Christian
ministers. I know you will say Amen. Yesterday I was fifty-four years
old. God be merciful to me a sinner ! Though you are older, I trust you
will not get the start of me, by going to heaven, before, reverend and very
dear sir, less than the least of all, , ^^^^^^ Whitefield." ^
' C. Wesley's Life, vol. ii., p. 242.
* Metliodist Magazine, 1 783, p. 68/^
VOL. in. B
Life and Times of Wesley.
J 768 Another letter, of the same kind, was addressed to Wesley,
AyiTcs on New Year's day, by his old friend at Everton.
"EVERTON, January i, 1768.
" Dear Sir, — I sec no reason why we should keep at a distance, whilst
wc continue servants of the same Master, and especially when Lot's herds-
men are so ready to lay their staves on our shoulders. Though my hand
has been mute, my heart is kindly affected towards you. I trust we agree
in essentials ; and, therefore, should leave each other at rest with his
circumstantials. I am weary of all disputes, and desire to know nothing
but Jesus ; to love Him, trust Him, and serve Him ; to choose and find
Him my only portion. I would have Him my meat, my drink, my clothing,
my sun, my shield, my Lord, my God, my all. Amen.
" When I saw you in town, I gave you an invitation to Everton ; and I
now repeat it, offering you very kindly the use of my house and church.
The Lord accompany you in all your journeys ! Kind love to your
brother. Adieu !
"John Berridge."'
At the close of the year 1767, the Earl of Buchan died
triumphing in the faith of Christ. He had been in the
habit of hearing Whitefield, the Wesleys, and others, at Bath,
and had felt their ministry a blessing. His last words were,
" Happy, happy, happy ! " The inscription upon his coffin
run thus: "His life was honourable, his death blessed; he
sought earnestly peace with God, — he found it with unspeak-
able joy, alone in the merits of Christ Jesus, witnessed by the
Holy Spirit to his soul."^ His countess dowager was a
woman of deep piety, of elegant taste, and of great genius.
She was the mother of a numerous family, and appointed
Venn, Berridge, and Wesley her domestic chaplains. This was
done through the intervention of Lady Huntingdon,^ to whom
Wesley addressed the following letter.
" London, January 4, 1 768.
"My de.\r Lady,— I am obliged to your ladyship, and to Lady
Buchan, for such a mark of your regard as I did not at all expect. I
purpose to return her ladyship thanks by this post.
"That remark is very striking, as well as just; — If it is the Holy Spirit
that bears witness, then all speaking against that Witness is one species
of blasphemy against the Holy Ghost. And when this is done by those
who profess to honour Him, it must in a peculiar manner grieve that
' Aft'fliodisf lifas^a^inc, 1857, p. 616.
2 " Life and Times of Countess of Huntingdon," vol. i., p. 17.
• Ibid. vol. ii., p. 427.
Wesley, Chap lain to Cotmtess of Biichan. 3
blessed Spirit. Yet, I have been surprised to observe how many, who 176b
affirm salvation by faith, have lately run into this ; running full into — -
Mr. Sandeman's notion, that faith is merely an assent to the Bible ; and =" ^
not only undervaluing, but even ridiculing, the whole experience of the
children of God. I rejoice, that your ladyship is still preserved from
that spreading contagion, and also enabled plainly and openly to avow the
plain, old, simple, unfashionable gospel.
" Wishing your ladyship many happy years, I remain, my dear lady,
your very affectionate servant,
"John Wesley." ^
A few months after this, Wesley went to Scotland, where
the Countess of Buchan resided, and there wrote, and
probably preached, his remarkable sermon, " The Good
Steward," in which, with great emphasis, he lays down the
doctrine, that we hold m trust our souls, our bodies, our goods,
and all our other talents ; and, for the tise of them, must
render an account at the judgment seat of Christ. This was
dealing faithfully with his noble patroness, as well as with
others; for the sermon was immediately published in i2mo,
24 pages, with the title, " The Good Steward. A Sermon, by
John Wesley, Chaplain to the Right Honourable the Countess
Dowager of Buchan."
Wesley was not the man to be elated by being noticed by
the rich, the noble, and the great. He was thankful for their
help ; but far from being proud of their approbation. Many
of his most trusted friends were poor and mean in reference to
this world's goods ; but, at the same time, were possessed of
riches incomparably superior to all the gold existing. The
following letter, addressed to Fletcher of Madeley, though a
month or two out of its chronological order, refers to these
and to other matters.
" BiRMlNGHAiM, March 20, 1768.
" Dear Sir, — Mr. Eastbrook told me yesterday, that you are sick
of the conversation even of them who profess religion, — that you find it
quite unprofitable, if not hurtful, to converse with them, three or four hours
together, and are sometimes almost determined to shut yourself up, as the
less evil of the two.
" I do not wonder at it at all, especially considering with whom you
have chiefly conversed for some time past, namely, the hearers of Mr.
Madan, or Mr. Bourian, perhaps I might add, of Mr. Whitefield. The
conversing with these I have rarely found to be profitable to my soul.
' Methodist Magazine, 1857, p. 693.
Lije and Times of Wesley.
1768 Rather it has damped my desires; it has cooled my resolutions, and I
— ■ liavc commonly left them with a dry, dissipated spirit,
^''■" ^ "And how can you expect it to be otherwise ? For do we not naturally
catch their spirit with whom we converse ? And what spirit can we ex-
pect them to be of, considering the preaching they sit under? Some
happy exceptions I allow ; but, in general, do men gather grapes of
tliorns ? Uo they gather constant, universal self denial, the patience of
liope, the labour of love, inward and outward self devotion, from the
doctrine of absolute decrees, of irresistible grace, of infallible perseverance?
Do they gather these fruits from antinomian doctrine ? Or from any
that borders upon it ? Do they gather them from that amorous way of
praying to Christ ? or that luscious way of preaching His righteousness ?
I never found it so. On the contrary, I have found, that even the
precious doctrine of salvation by fiiith has need to be guarded with the
utmost care, or those who hear it will slight both inward and outward
holiness.
" I will go a step farther : I seldom find it profitable for vie to converse
with any who are not athirst for perfection, and who are not big with
earnest expectation of receiving it every moment. Now you find none
of these among those we are speaking of; but many, on the contrary, who
are in various ways, directly and indirectly, opposing the whole work of
God, — that work, I mean, which God is carrying on, throughout this king-
dom, by unlearned and plain men; in consequence of which His influence
must, in some measure, be withdrawn from them. Again : you have, for
some time, conversed a good deal with the genteel Methodists. Now it
matters not a straw what doctrine they hear, — whether they frequent the
Lock or West Street. They are, almost all, salt which has lost its
savour, if ever they had any. They are thoroughly conformed to the
maxims, the spirit, the fashions, and customs of the world. Certainly
tiien, ' Nuuquain ad cos Jiotnincs ibis qi/in viiiior lioino 7-cdibis.'
" But were these or those of ever so excellent a spirit, you conversed
with them too long. One had need to be an angel, not a man, to con-
verse three or four hours at once, to any purpose. In the latter part of
such conversation, we shall doubtless lose all the profit we had gained
before.
" But have you not a remedy for all this in your hands ? In order to
truly profitable conversation, may you not select persons clear both of
Calvinism and antinomianism? not fond of that luscious way of talking,
but standing in awe of Him they love ; who are vigorously working out
their salvation, and are athirst for full redemption, and every moment
expecting it, if not already enjoying it? It is true, these will generally be
j)oor and mean, seldom possessed of either riches or learning, unless there
be now and then a rara az'is in tcrris : a Miss IMarch, or Betty Johnson.
If you converse with these, humbly and simply, an hour at a time, with
prayer before and prayer after, you will not complain of the unprofitable-
ness of conversation, or find any need of turning hermit.
"As to the conference, at Worcester, on lay preaching, do not you
Letters, 5
observe almost all the lay preachers — (i) Are connected with me? 1768
and — (2) Are maintainers of universal redemption ? Hinc illce lacrymce! —
These gentlemen do not love me, and do love particular redemption. ^S.^ ^5
If these laymen were connected with them, or if they were Calvinists, all
would be well. Therefore, I should apprehend you will have two things
to do : — I. Urge the argument, the strength of which I believe is in the
Second Appeal, and, above all, in the Letter to a Clergyman. 2, Apply
to the conscience, 'You do not love Mr. Wesley enough: you love your
opinions too much ; otherwise this debate would never have arisen: for it
is undeniable, these quacks cure whom we cannot cure, they save
sinners all over the nation. God is with them, and works by them, and
has done so for near these thirty years. Therefore, the opposing them
is neither better nor worse than fighting against God.'
" I am your ever affectionate brother,
"John Wesley." '
One more letter may be introduced; before we turn to
Wesley's journal. At the beginning of 1768, a third son
was born to Charles Wesley, and it was naturally the wish of
such a father, that one of his three sons might become a
minister of Christ, — a wish, however, that was not realised.
Wesley alludes to this, and to the yearly collections and
other things, in the following to his brother, showing that
Charles either seldom attended conference, or, if he did
attend, took little interest in its financial matters.
"London, Jaimary 15, 1768.
"Dear Brother, — Six or seven hundred pounds is brought to a
conference : of which five hundred at least pays the debt.- Then extra-
ordinary demands are answered. How much remains for law ? I am now
near ^^300 out of pocket, which I borrowed to pay Mr. Pardon. When I
receive some more from Newcastle, I will send it to Bristol; probably
very soon.
" It is highly probable, one of the three will stand before the Lord. But,
so far as I can learn, such a thing has scarce been for these thousand
' Manuscript letter.
- The meaning of this is, that, at least, ^500 of what the Methodists
have always technically designated " The Yearly Collection," was, at this
period, employed in paying chapel debts. Except that for Kingswood
school, this was the only connexional collection that Wesley had ; and
he strongly insisted that every Methodist should render it support. In
an tinpiiblished letter, addressed to Matthew Lowes, and dated March 1 1,
1762, Wesley writes : " In the enclosed papers, (which you may read in
every society, just before you meet the classes,) you will see the design of
the general yearly collection, to which every Methodist in England is to
contribute something. If there is any who cannot give a halfpenny a
year, another will give it for him."
Life and Times of Wesley.
17CS years, as a son, father, grandfather, atavus, iriiavus, preaching the
— f,'ospcl, nay, and the genuine gospel, in a hne. You know, Mr. White,
^K^ ^5 sometime chairman of the Assembly of Divines, was my grandmother's
father.
" Look upon our little ones at Kingswood as often as you can. A word
from you will be a quickening to them. Oh how many talents are we en-
trusted with. We have need to gird up the loins of our mind, and run
faster the small remainder of our race. ' One thing ! ' — let us mind one
thing only ; and nothing great or small, but as it ministers to it ! Peace
be with you and yours ! Adieu! "John Wesley."'
Wesley's first journey from London, in 1768, was on the
18th of February, to Chatham. Methodism of some sort had
existed here for a considerable time. As early as 175 1, the
Giiitlcmans Magazine relates, that a man and his wife at
Chatham, both of them being Methodists, had hanged them-
selves ; and that, in order to prove the man a lunatic, his
friends produced, to the coroner's jury, the New Testament,
on a roll of paper, which the man had written with his
blood.2
Wesley writes : " Thursday, February 1 8 — Having been
importunately pressed thereto, I rode through a keen east
wind to Chatham. About six in the evening, I preached at
the barracks, in what they call the church. It is a large
room, in which the chaplain reads prayers, and preaches now
and then. It was soon as hot as an oven, through the
multitude of people ; some hundreds of whom were soldiers ;
and they were ' all ear,' as Mr. Boston says, scarcely allowing
themselves to breathe. Even between five and six the next
morning, the room was warm enough. I suppose upwards of
two hundred soldiers were a part of the audience. Many of
these are already warring a good warfare."
This was Wesley's first visit to Chatham ; but not his last.
From the beginning, he had loved soldiers, and, to the end, it
was always a pleasure to preach to them.
On March 6, he set out on his long northern journey,
which occupied the next five months. A few jottings respect-
ing it may be acceptable.
At Gloucester, a "noisy and mischievous mob" had been
' Wesley's Works, vol. xii., p. 126.
"^ Gentleman's Magazine, 1751, p. 179.
Methodist Jottings.
" taken in hand and tamed by an honest magistrate." Chelten- 1768
ham was " a quiet, comfortable place," despite the " rector and a^5
the anabaptist minister." At Worcester, the difficulty was,
where to preach, no room being large enough to contain the
people, and it being too cold for them to stand in the open air.
At length, a friend offered the use of his barn, which "was
larger than many churches." " Nothing," says Wesley, " is
wanting here but a commodious house," Such a house was
built four years afterwards,^ and lasted till 1812, when good
old James M'Kee Byron and the Worcester ]\Iethodists w^ere
mad enough to build another costing upwards of i^Sooo, the
great bulk of which was left to be paid by their successors.^
At Evesham, Wesley preached in the parish church ; and
was announced, by the vicar, to do the same at Pebworth ;
but " the squire of the parish" interposed an interdict, and
therefore he preached in the open air.
At Birmingham, the tumults, of so many years' continuance,
were " now wholly suppressed by a resolute magistrate." Here
W^esley met " with a venerable monument of antiquity,
George Bridgins, in the one hundred and seventh year of his
age, still able to walk to preaching, and retaining his senses
and understanding tolerably well."
On Sunday, March 20, Wesley preached at West Brom-
wich, where a small society of about twenty persons had
been kept together by Francis Asbury, a native of a neigh-
bouring parish, but afterwards the Methodist bishop of the
United States.
Five years before, at Wolverhampton, the mob had levelled
the Methodist meeting-house to the ground, and four young
fellows concerned in the outrage had been sent to prison f
but now, says Wesley " all was quiet : only those who could
not get into the house made a little noise for a time ; and
some hundreds attended me to my lodging ; but it was with
no other intent than to stare."
Wesley pronounces Newcastle under Lyne "one of the
prettiest towns in England." Though it was extremely cold,
the largeness of the congregation constrained him to preach in
^ Myles's History.
^' Methodist Magazine, 1825, p. 122; and 1S29, p. 585.
^ Gentle/nan's Magazi)ie, 1 763, p. 463.
8 Life and Times of Wesley.
1768 the open air ; " a more attentive or better behaved congrega-
,\ ~65 tion " he " scarce ever saw." Sixteen years later, Newcastle
had a society of one hundred and nine members, the leaders
of wlioni were John Glynn, William Bayley, Robert Keeling,
and Thomas Bamficld.^
At Burslcm, on March 25, he opened the new chapel ; and,
at Congleton, had " an elegant, yet earnestly attentive con-
gregation," the behaviour of the society having won the ap-
probation of all the people in the town, except " the curate,
who still refused to give the sacrament to any who would not
promise to hear the Methodist preachers no more."
For nine years past, the Methodists had been wont to meet
in a room provided by Dr. Troutbeck, behind his own re-
sidence ; and here they had been subjected to the same sort
of outrages that most towns in the kingdom thought it their
duty to commit upon the Methodists. Drums were beaten to
disturb their services ; dogs were let loose in their congrega-
tions ; and rotten eggs and filth were often hurled at them in
plentiful profusion ; but, by their godly behaviour, they had
• outlived all this, and now had a galleried chapel, capable
of containing about four hundred persons.
Wesley spent Sunday, March 27, at Macclesfield, where he
preached to " thousands upon thousands." A few years
before, George Pearson and Elizabeth Clulow had opened a
preaching house, which would hol(i forty people, and which, to
prevent ejectment, they secured to themselves for forty years.
"Ah, George!" said Mrs. Clulow, when they first went into
it, " we shall never be able to fill the place ; why, it will hold
forty folk ;" to which Mr. Pearson replied, " I'll warrant you ;
hold up your heart." The result was as George predicted.
In a month the room was crammed, and a hole was cut
through the chamber floor, so that the preacher might, at the
same time, address those above as well as those below. Soon
after this, Mr. Ryles gave ground and materials for a chapel,
on condition that Mrs. Clulow would pay the workmen their
wages for building it. This was done in 1764, and now, in
17CS, Methodism in Macclesfield was fairly started.^
' Burslem old circuit boolc
."■' Manuscript.
Methodism in Liverpool and Glasgow. 9
From Macclesfield, Wesley proceeded to Stockport, Man- 1768
Chester, and New Mills. He writes : " Wednesday, March 30 ^^5^
— I rode to a little town called New Mills, and preached in
their large new chapel, which has a casement in every window,
three inches square! That is the custom of the country!"
This well ventilated chapel was built principally by Mr. and
Mrs. Beard, the parents of the wife of the late T. Holy, Esq.,
of Sheffield. 1
Coming to Liverpool, on April 6, Wesley says : " We had a
huge congregation at Liverpool ; but some pretty, gay,
fluttering things did not behave with so much good manners
as the mob at Wigan. The congregations in general were
quite well behaved, as well as large, both morning and even-
ing ; and I found the society both more numerous and more
lively than ever it was before."
One of these " huge congregations," after a sermon by
Wesley, on Sunday, April 10, were munificent enough to
make a collection amounting to £\ ^s. ()d. ; and the society,
which was more numerous and lively than ever, aided by the
general congregations, managed to contribute, in their classes
and at public collections, from September i, 1768, to January
16, 1769, the sum of i^io lys. ^d. for the support of the work
of God among them.^ Such was Liverpool Methodism a
hundred years ago !
On April 19, Wesley arrived in Glasgow, and says :
" We have few societies in Scotland like this. The greater
part of the members not only have found peace with God, but
continue to walk in the light of His countenance. That wise
and good man, Mr. Gillies, has been of great service to them,
encouraging them to abide in the grace of God." Three
years before this, Thomas Taylor had been sent to Glasgow,
and, after travelling several hundreds of miles to his appoint-
ment, had, as his first congregation, two bakers' boys and two
old women, which congregation, however, kept increasing till
it reached about two hundred. Taylor tells us, that for want
of means he never kept so many fast days as he did in
Glasgow ; and, though he ultimately obtained a preaching
^ Methodist Mas;azine, 1812, p. 534; and 1843, P- Sy.
2 Liverpool old society book.
lo Life and Times of Wesley.
1768 room, and formed a society, and engaged to pay a precentor
\;;i.~65 '^''iirp'-'"ce for cacli service at which he led ofif the psalms, he
found it so difficult to raise the money that he dismissed the
psalms and the psalm singer all together. He left behind
him, however, a society of seventy members.
One of these was Robert Mackie, who, for thirty years, acted
as a faithful classleader ; and another was a poor old woma.n,
concerning whom John Pawson, in an unpublished letter, tells
the following story. Meeting in the street the minister of
the kirk she had been accustomed to attend, she was thus
accosted : " Oh, Janet, where have ye been, woman } I have no
seen ye at the kirk for long." "I go," said Janet, "among the
Methodists." "Among the Methodists ! " quoth the minister ;
" why what gude get ye there, woman .-' " " Glory to God ! "
replied Janet, "I do get gude; for God, for Christ's sake, has
forgiven me aw my sins ! " " Ah, Janet," said the minister,
" be not highminded, but fear ; the devil is a cunning adver-
sary." " I dunna care a button for the deevil," answered
Janet, " I 've gotten him under my feet. I ken the deevil can
do muckle deal, but there is ane thing he canna do." " What
is that, Janet .? " " He canna shed abroad the love of God
in my heart ; and I am sure I 've got it there ! " " Weel,
wecl ! " replied the good tempered man, " if ye have got
there, Janet, hold it fast, and never let it go ! "
Wesley's information was sometimes incorrect. From what
he had heard, he expected to find a numerous and lively
society at Perth ; but, instead of that, he " found not above
two believers, and scarce five awakened persons in it."
At Aberdeen, the society was knit together in peace and
love, and the congregations large and deeply attentive ; but,
among them, were " many rude, stupid creatures, who knew
as little of reason as of religion," and one of w^hom threw a
potato at Wesley.
Having spent a month in Scotland, Wesley reached Berwick
on the iSth of May, and proceeded to Newcastle, in the
neighbourhood of which he employed the next ten days.
At Sunderland, he had an interview with Elizabeth Hobson,
a young woman of twenty-four years of age; and took down,
from her own lips, what he properly designates " one of the
strangest accounts that he ever read." The substance of it is
Wesley s Credulity. 1 1
to illustrate her assertion, that, from her childhood, when any 1768
of her neighbours died, she used to see them, either just at Age^65
the time of their decease, or a little previous. He says :
" The well known character of Elizabeth Hobson excludes all
suspicion of fraud, and the nature of the circumstances them-
selves excludes the possibility of delusion. The reader may
believe the narrative if he pleases ; or may disbelieve it, with-
out any offence to me. Meantime, let him not be offended if
I believe it, till I see better reason to the contrary." After
this follow Elizabeth Hobson's bewildering statements,
Wesley has been censured and ridiculed for this credulity.
Southey says, " he invalidated his own authority by listen-
ing to the most absurd tales and recording them as au-
thenticated facts." Did Wesley deserve this .-^ The reader
must not forget the undeniable, though mysterious, super-
natural noises in the Epworth rectory. He must also bear
in mind, that one of the most striking features in Wesley's
religious character was his deep rooted, intense, powerful, and
impelling conviction of the dread realities of an unseen world.
This gr^t conviction took possession of the man ; he loved
it, cherished it, tried to instil it into all his helpers and all his
people ; and, without it, he would never have undertaken the
Herculean labour, and endured the almost unparalleled op-
probrium, that he did. Besides, his own justification of him-
self is more easily sneered at than answered. He writes : —
"With my latest breath, will I bear my testimony against giving up to
infidels one great proof of the invisible world ; I mean, that of witchcraft
and apparitions, confirmed by the testimony of all ages. The English, in
general, and, indeed, most of the men of learning in Europe, have given
up all accounts of witches and apparitions, as mere old wives' fables. I
am sorry for it ; and I willingly take this opportunity of entering my
solemn protest against this violent compliment, which so many that believe
the Bible pay to those who do not beheve it. I owe them no such service. *
I take knowledge, these are at the bottom of the outcry which has been
raised, and with such insolence spread throughout the nation, in direct
opposition not only to the Bible, but to the suffrage of the wisest and
best of men in all ages and nations. They well know (whether Christians
know it, or not) that the giving up witchcraft is, in effect, giving up the
Bible ; and they know, on the other hand, that if but one account of the
intercourse of men with separate spirits be admitted, their whole castle in
the air — deism, atheism, materialism — falls to the ground. I know no
reason, therefore, why we should suffer even this weapon to be wrested
Life and Times of Wesley,
1768 out of our hands. Indeed, there are numerous arguments besides this,
— wliich aljundantly confute their vain imaginations. But we need not be
^^"^ ^5 liootcd out of one ; neither reason nor religion requires this. One of the
capital objections to all these accounts is, ' Did you ever see an appari-
tion yourself?' No, nor did I ever see a murder ; yet I believe there is
such a thing. The testimony of unexceptionable witnesses fully convinces
me both of the one and the other." '
At the same time, it is only fair to add that, though Wesley
was a firm believer in witches and apparitions, he was not the
fanatic which some had been before him ; hence, in 1769, he
writes: "I read Mr, Glanvill's 'Sadducismus Triqmphatus;'
but some of his relations I cannot receive, and much less his
way of accounting for them. All his talk of ' aerial and
astral spirits,' I take to be stark nonsense. Indeed, supposing
the facts true, I wonder a man of sense should attempt to
account for them at all. For who can explain the things
of the invisible world, but the inhabitants of it .'' "
Before proceeding further in Wesley's history, extracts
from two or three of his letters, belonging to this period, may
be inserted here.
Separation from the Church, and the doctrine of Christian
perfection, were points still far from being settled. Hence
the following to his brother.
"Edinburgh, May 14, 1768.
" Dear Brother, — I am at my wits' end with regard to two things —
the Church, and Christian perfection. Unless both you and I stand in the
gap in good earnest, the Methodists will drop them both. Talking will
not avail. Wc must do, or be borne away. Will you set shoulder to
shoulder ? If so, think deeply upon the matter, and tell me what can be
done. ''Age, vir esto J nervos intendas iuos.' Peace be with you and
yours! Adieu! ,, , -nr „■>
^ "John Wesley." 2
A month later, Wesley recurs to the same subject, and
congratulates his brother on the results of his removing to
London.
''Jinie 14, 1768.
" Dear Brother,— I rejoice to hear, from various persons, so good an
account of the work of God in London. You did not come thither with-
out the Lord, and you find your labour is not in vain. I doubt not but
you will sec more and more fruit, while you converse chiefly with them
> Wesley's Works, vol. xiv., p. 276. 2 ji^j^ ^.q] ^jj^ p_ ,-,6.
Wesley and Erskine. 1 3
xD
Age 65
that are athirst for God. I find a wonderful difference in myself when I 1768
am among these, and when I am among fashionable Methodists. On
this account, the north of England suits me best, where so many are
■ groaning after full redemption.
"But what shall we do ? I think it is high time, that you and I, at
least, should come to a point. Shall we go on in asserting perfection
against all the world .'* Or shall we quietly let it drop ? We really must
do one or the other ; and, I apprehend, the sooner the better. What
shall we jointly and explicitly maintain, and recommend to all our preach-
ers, concerning the nature, the time (now or by-and-by), and the manner
of it ? instantaneous or not ? I am weary of intestine war ; of preachers
quoting one of us against the other. At length, let us fix something for
good and all, either the same as formerly, or different from it. — Eppan-o.
"John Wesley."'
Dr. Erskine's attack on Wesley has been already mentioned
(see Vol. II., p. 530). During Wesley's visit to Scotland, he
sought an interview with his opponent, and refers to their
points of difference in the following interesting letter to the
Rev. Mr. Plendelieth, of Edinburgh.
"May 23, 1768.
"Reverend and dear Sir, — Some years ago, it was reported that
I recommended the use of a crucifix, to a man under sentence of death.
I traced this up to its author, Dr. Stennett, an anabaptist teacher. He
was charged w-ith it. He answered, 'Why I saw a crucifix in his cell (a
picture of Christ on the cross), and I knew Mr. Wesley used to visit him,
so I supposed he had brought it.' This is the whole of the matter. Dr.
Stennett himself I never saw ; nor did I ever see such a picture in the
cell ; and I believe the whole tale is pure invention.
" I had, for some time, given up the thought of an interview with Mr.
Erskine, when I fell into the company of Dr. Oswald. He said, ' Sir,
you do not know Mr. Erskine. I know him perfectly well. Send and
desire an hour's conversation with him, and I am sure he will understand
you better.' I am glad I did send. I have done my part, and am now
entirely satisfied. I am likewise glad, that Mr. Erskine has spoken his
' Wesley's Works, vol. xii., p. 126. All this confusion arose chiefly out of
the half insane ravings of Bell and his friends in 1762. In a long, unpub-
lished letter, dated September 29, 1 764, Wesley writes : " I never stag-
gered at all at the reveries of George Bell. I saw instantly, at the begin-
ning and from the beginning, what was right and what was wrong ; but I
saw withal, 'I have many things to speak, but you cannot bear them now.'
Hence, many imagined I was imposed upon ; and applauded themselves
in their greater perspicacity ; as they do at this day. ' But if you knew
it,' says his friend to Gregory Lopez, ' why did you not tell me 1'' I answer
with him, ' I do not speak all I know, but what I judge needful.' Still, I
am persuaded, there is no state under heaven from which it is not possible
to fall."
14 Life and Times of Wesley.
1768 mind. I will answer uith all simplicity, in full confidence of satisfying
— yon, and all impartial men.
Age 65 ujj^ objects, (i) That I attack predestination as subversive of all
religion, and yet suffer my followers, in Scotland, to remain in that
opinion.
" Much of this is true. I did attack predestination eight-and-twenty
years ago ; and I do not believe now any predestination which implies
irrespective reprobation. But I do not believe, it is necessarily stibver-
j/wof all religion. I think hot disputes are much more so. Therefore,
I never willingly dispute with any one about it ; and I advise all my
friends, not in Scotland only, but all over England and Ireland, to avoid
all contention on the head, and let every man remain in his own opinion.
Can any man of candour blame me for this 1 Is there anything unfair or
disingctiuojcs about it ?
" He objects, (2) That I 'assert the attainment of sinless perfection by
all that are born of God.' I am sorry, that Mr. Erskine should affirm this
again. I need give no other answer than I gave before, in the seventh
page of the little tract I sent him two years ago. I do not maintain this.
I do not believe it. I believe Christian perfection is not attained by any
of the children of God, till they are what the apostle John terms fathers ;
and this I expressly declare in that sermon which Mr. Erskine so largely
quotes.
" He objects, (3) That I ' deny the imputation of Christ's active
obedience.' Since I believed justification by faith, which I have done
upwards of thirty years, I have constantly maintained, that we are par-
doned and accepted wholly for the sake of what Christ hath both done and
suffered for us. Two or three years ago, Mr, Madan's sister showed him
what she had wrote down of a sermon which I had preached on this sub-
ject. He entreated me to write down the whole and print it, saying, it
would satisfy all my opponents. I was not so sanguine as to expect this :
I understood mankind too well. However, I complied with his request ; a
few were satisfied ; the rest continued just as they were before.
"As long as Mr. Erskine continues in the mind expressed in his
Theological Essays, there is no danger, that he and I should agree, any
' more than light and darkness. I love and reverence him ; but not his
doctrine. I dread every approach to antinomianism. I have seen the
fruit of it, over the three kingdoms. I never said, that Mr. Erskine and
I were agreed. 1 will make our disagreement as public as ever he pleases :
only I must withal specify the particulars. If he ivill fight with me, it
must be on this ground ; and then let him do what he will, and what he
can.
" Retaining a due sense of your friendly offices, and praying for a bless-
ing on all your labours, I remam, reverend and dear sir, your affectionate
brother and servant,
"John Wesley." ^
' Methodist Magazine, 1783, p. 681.
Wesk/s Will. 15
These were mutterings before the storm, — skirmishes before 1768
the battle, — a prelude to the great Calvinian controversy of Age 65
1770 and onwards.
We abruptly turn to another matter. Wesley was a man
who iDelieved in the importance of making preparations for
dying, inmore respects than one. He writes on the last day
of the year 1786: "From these words, 'Set thy house in
order,' I strongly exhorted all who had not done it already,
to settle their temporal affairs without delay. It is a strange
madness which still possesses many, that are in other respects
men of understanding, who put this off from day to day, till
death comes in an hour when they looked not for it."
Wesley acted upon his own advice. He was without
money ; but he had books, etc. : and to prevent quarrels after
he was dead, he made more wills than one respecting their
disposal. One executed in 1768 was, of course, different from
his last, executed in 1789 ; and, as something more than a
curiosity, we subjoin a verbatim copy, made from the original
in Wesley's own handwriting.
" In the name of God. Amen ! I, John Wesley, Clerk, revoking all
other, appoint this to be my last Will and Testament.
" I bequeath to my brother Charles Wesley, (but in case of his demise
to the School in Kingswood,) my Hebrew, Greek, Latin, French, and
German books (except those, in any language, in the study at Kings-
wood School, which I bequeath to the said School ; and those in my
studies at Bristol, Newcastle upon Tyne, and Dublin, which I desire may
remain there for the use of the Travelling Preachers) ; and all my gowns,
cassocks, and bands. To James Morgan, I bequeath my watch; to my
faithful Housekeeper, Ann Smith, Mrs. Lefevre's ring; to Mr. Peter Jaco,
my bureau at London ; to him, to the Rev. William Ley, and to each
Travelling Preacher, who has them not already, a set of my Sermons,
Appeals, Journals, the Notes on the New Testament, and the book on
Original Sin ; to the Rev. Mr. James Roquet, all my manuscripts ; to my
dear friend, Mary Bosanquet, the set of my Works ; to my dear daughter,
Jane Smith, the ' Christian Library,' now in my study at London.
" I bequeath all my Books, which are for sale, with the sole right of re-
printing them, (after paying my brother's Rent Charge upon them,) to
Mr. Melchias Teulon, Hatter, Mr. John Horton, Silkdyer, and Mr. John
Collinson, Hatter, in Trust, the one moiety for the keeping the Children
of Travelling Preachers at the School (to be chosen by the Assistants at
the Yearly Conference), the other moiety for the continual relief of the
Poor of the United Society in London. Only I bequeath to Christiana
1 6 Life and Times of Wesley.
17O8 Simpson, at Aberdeen, the Books which shall remain with her, at the
~, time of my decease.
■ ^'^ ^ "Lastly, I bequeath the residue of my Books and Goods to my wife,
IMary Wesley. And I appoint the said Melchias Teulon, John Horton,
and John Collinson, Executors of this my last Will and Testament.
" Witness my hand and seaV this 27th day of April, 1768,
, "John Wesley.
" Witnesses :
"William Smith.
" THOiMAS Simpson."
A man's -will is a document in which he generally makes
mention of his best beloved friends. On this ground, a few
notes appended to Wesley's will of 1768 may be useful.
1. Wesley's principal bequest, in 1768, was to Kingswood
school, and to the poor of the society in London. In 1789,
this bequest was made to " the general fund of the Methodist
conference, in carrying on the work of God by itinerant
preachers."
2. James Roquet was made the trustee of Wesley's manu-
scripts in 1768; but, having died during the interim, Dr. Coke,
Dr. Whitehead, and Henry Moore were appointed in 1789 to
take his place.
3. In 1768, he bequeathed all his gowns, cassocks, and
bands to his brother; in 1789, to the clergymen preaching in
City Road chapel, London.
4. In 1768, James Morgan was to have his watch ; but, in
1789, James Morgan was dead, and Joseph Bradford got it.
5. In 176S, Mrs. Martha Hall had no bequest, for her bad
husband was then living ; in 1789, he was dead, and hence her
legacy of ;^40.
6. In 1768, there was a legacy for his wife; in 1789, his
wife was in her grave.
7. Wesley makes mention of his "dear daughter, Jane
Smith." This lady was really his wife's daughter, who was
now married to Mr. William Smith, of Newcastle upon Tyne,
one of the witnesses.
8. James Roquet, to whom Wesley bequeathed his manu-
scripts, was the son of a French Protestant refugee, was
• Wesley's seal is a dove, having in its mouth an olive branch, and
surrounded with the words "Nuncia Pacis."
Wesley's Will. 1 7
educated in the Merchant Taylors' school in London, was 1768
converted under Whitefield's ministry, graduated at St. John's j^f^^
college, Oxford, became master in Wesley's school at Kings-
wood, obtained episcopal ordination, and was now curate of
St. Werburgh, Bristol.
9. The Rev. William Ley, to whom Wesley bequeathed a
set of his publications, was, from the year 1760 to 1763, an
itinerant preacher. He was then episcopally ordained, and
was now the curate of Lakenheath, but likely to be dismissed
by the vicar, to whom his Methodistic preaching and pro-
cedure were offensive.^
10. Of one of the executors of Wesley's will, John Collin-
son, we can give no particulars.
11. The second, Mr. Teulon, was born at Bromley, in 1734;
and was sent to school at Nottingham. At fourteen, he was
put apprentice to his uncle, Mr. Wagner, of Pall Mall, hatter
to King George IL He was converted under the ministry of
Romaine, joined the Methodists, and, in 1761, married Miss
Mecham, the daughter of one of the earliest Methodists in
London. For four years, he was Wesley's London steward,
and was leader of a class. He was a man of some literary
taste, and had read most of the best English authors. He
died in 1806, respected and beloved by all who knew him.^
12. The third executor, John Horton, was a member of the
common council of London, sensible, well read, serious with-
out gloom, cheerful without levity, and polite without cere-
mony. The unhappy differences after Wesley's death induced
him to leave the Methodists, and he went to reside at Bristol.^
He retained his warm attachment, however, to "the old ship,''
as he was accustomed to designate Wesley's system ; again
attended the Methodist preaching, and, only a few months
before his death, when his son was preparing for the university,
declared to Henry Moore, that he would " rather see his son
a Methodist preacher, than archbishop of Canterbury." He
died in peace about the year 1802.*
We left Wesley at Newcastle. On the 31st of May, he set
^ Methodist Magazine, 1805, p. 277. ^ Ibid. 1808, p. 297.
^ Theological Magazine, 1802, p. 39.
* Methodist Magazine, 1803, p. 215.
VOL. III. C
i8 Life and Times of Wesley.
1768 out for Wcardale, Tccsdale, and Swaledale, where he spent
^"Tg- the next four days. At Richmond, he preached in the
market place, the Yorkshire mihtia forming a considerable
part of his congregation, — "a rude rabble rout, without
sense, decency, or good manners." At Barnardcastle, the
Durham militia was a perfect contrast, officers and soldiers
all behaving well. Wesley's visit to the " dales " .circuit
was a pleasant one. He writes : " I have not found so deep
and lively a work in any other part of the kingdom as runs
through the whole circuit, particularly in the vales that wind
between these horrid mountains."
Returning to Newcastle, Wesley visited South Shields, and
preached to more than could hear him. Here the poor
Methodists were often beaten, rolled in the mud and in the
snow, and sometimes narrowly escaped with life : but, con-
tinuing faithful, God honoured them ; a cockpit was turned
into a Methodist chapel,^ and Methodism was firmly anchored.
On the 13th of June, Wesley left Newcastle for the south,
and spent the next six weeks in visiting his societies in York-
shire and Lincolnshire.
The Rev. Thomas Adam, rector of Wintringham, one of
the evangelical clergymen of the period, has been already
mentioned. Like some others, this unquestionably pious man
had become a determined opponent of the Methodists, and
hence the following letter, addressed to him by Wesley.
" SwiNFLEET, July 19, 1768,
"Reverend and dear Sir, — One of Wintringham informed me
yesterday, that you said no sensible and well meaning man could hear,
and much less join, the Methodists; because they all acted under a he,
professing themselves members of the Church of England, while they
licensed themselves as Dissenters. You are a little misinformed. The
greater part of the Methodist preachers are not licensed at all ; and
several of them that are, are not licensed as Dissenters.
" We are, in truth, so far from being enemies to the Church, rather
bigots to it. I dare not, like Mr. Venn, leave the parish church where I
am, to go to an Independent meeting. I dare not advise others to go
thither, rather than to church. I advise all, over whom I have any in-
fluence, steadily to keep to the Church. Meantime, I advise them to see,
that the kingdom of God is within them ; that their hearts be full of love
to God and man ; and to look upon all, of whatever opinion, who are
' Methodist Magazine, 18 13, p. 441.
Clergymen. 1 9
like minded, as their 'brother, and sister, and mother.' O sir ! what art 1768
of men or devils is this, which makes you so studiously stand aloof from
those who are thus minded ? I cannot but say to you, as I did to Mr. '''^ -
Walker, * The Methodists do not want you ; but you want them.' You
want the life, the spirit, the power, which they have ; not of themselves,
but by the free grace of God ; else how could it be, that so good a man,
and so good a preacher, should have so little fruit of his labour, his un-
wearied labour, for so many years ? Have your parishioners the life of
religion in their souls ? Have they so much as the form of it ? Are the
people of Wintringham, in general, any better than those of Winterton,
or Horton ? Alas ! sir, what is it that hinders your reaping the fruit of
so much pains and so many prayers ?
" Is it not possible this may be the very thing, your setting yourself
against those whom God owns, by the continual conviction and conversion
of sinners? I fear, as long as you in anywise oppose these, your rod will
not blossom, neither will you see the desire of your soul, in the prosperity
of the souls committed to your charge.
" I am, dear sir, your affectionate brother,
"John Wesley."*
In his journey southwards, Wesley visited, for the second
time, his friend Fletcher, at Madeley, — a man, in many
respects, the opposite of Mr. Adam of Wintringham, and
especially in his feelings towards the Methodists. So far
from shunning them, or being ashamed of them, he, as far as
possible, identified himself with them ; and, at the very last
conference before he died, entreated Wesley to make Madeley
a circuit town, and to put John Fletcher down as a super-
numerary preacher there. He made his kitchen a Methodist
chapel, in which Wesley's itinerants and his own curate regu-
larly preached ; while his study was the place in which were
penned the ablest defences of Wesley's doctrines that were
ever committed to the public press.
From Madeley, Wesley went to Shrewsbury, where, as
early as 1744, there was a poor woman, who had been con-
verted in London under the preaching of the Methodists, and
who now obtained a living, by mending her neighbours'
stockings. While thus employed, at their respective houses,
she would relate to them her religious experience, read to
them a sermon, and then engage in prayer. By this means, she
had already formed a society of sixteen or eighteen persons ;
and the Rev. Job Orton, the well known author, a native
* Wesley's Works, vol. iii., p. 320.
20 Life and Times of Wesley.
1768 of Shrewsbury, and at this time its presbyterian minister,
AtiTes clcclarcd that this poor stocking-mending Methodist was not
only of " an excellent and serious spirit," but had had more
success in converting sinners than he had had by all his
preaching.^
Leaving Shrewsbury, Wesley rode right through Wales to
Pembroke, where he "read prayers, preached, and administered
the sacrament to a serious congregation at St. Daniels;" and so
tried to remove some misunderstandings among the Method-
ists, that he " left the people full of good desires, and in toler-
able good humour with each other." Here Methodism had
been begun seven years before, when Thomas Taylor tra-
versed mountains, forded rivers, and plunged through bogs,
with an empty purse and an empty stomach, seeking to save
sinners with a zeal and a spirit of self denial worthy of the
noblest missionary that ever lived.^
At Neath, where the minister of the parish was just dead,
the churchwardens announced, that Wesley would preach in
the parish church. He did so, but says : " I was greatly
disgusted at the manner of singing, i. Twelve or fourteen
persons kept it to themselves, and quite shut out the congre-
gation. 2. These repeated the same words, contrary to all
sense and reason, six, or eight, or ten times over. 3. According
to the shocking custom of modern music, different persons
sung different words at one and the same moment ; an in-
tolerable insult on common sense, and utterly incompatible
with any devotion."
After more than five months of laborious travelling, Wesley
came to Bristol on Saturday the 13th of August, between eleven
and twelve o'clock at night. His conference had to open two
days afterwards ; but the first news he heard was, that his
wife was dangerously ill in London. He had about forty-
eight hours before he must meet his preachers, twenty-four of
which were sabbatical. The distance to London and back
again was two hundred and twenty-eight miles ; the roads
not the best ; and the mode of travelling a perfect contrast
to what exists at present. Wesley was an aged man, of more
than sixty-five ; for nearly six months he had been travelling
' Mctlwdht Magazine, 1 815, p. 459. - Taylor's "Redeeming Grace."
Preaching and T^^'ading. 21
and preaching incessantly, and might now fairly wish for a 1768
few hours' rest. But no sooner did he hear of his wife's Age65
affliction, than, notwithstanding her unloving heart and life, he
started off to London, which, by travelling most of the sabbath
day, he reached at one o'clock on Monday morning ; when,
finding that the fever was abated and the danger gone, he set
out again within an hour, and, by hard driving, arrived in
Bristol on Monday afternoon. Next morning he opened his
annual conference, and closed it the following Friday, ex-
claiming, " Oh ! what can we do for more labourers ? We can
only cry to the Lord of the harvest."
One of the chief points discussed at the present conference
was, whether the itinerant preachers should be allowed to
engage in trade. This was a question at once delicate and
difficult. In the first place, many of them had wives and
children, the provision for whose maintenance was of the most
slender kind. Secondly, the men were not ordained, and had
no clerical status whatever. So far there seemed to be no
difficulty. But, in the third place, though not ordained, the
preachers were regarded by Wesley as occupying, to all
practical intents and purposes, the same position as the
regular ministers of the Church of England ; and, hence,
he considered it as unseemly and as improper for his itine-
rants to be engaged in trade as it would be for the clergy
of the Established Church. " God," says he, " has called us to
supply their lack of service to the sheep that are without
shepherds, and to spend and be spent therein. Every travel-
ling preacher solemnly professes to have nothing else to do ;
and receives his little allowance for this very end, that he may
not need to do anything else, — that he may not be entangled
in the things of this life, but may give himself wholly to
these things."
The result was, the few preachers who had resorted to some
kind of trade, for the purpose of eking out the insufficient
maintenance for their families were advised to give up their
business as soon a-s possible, and especially hazvking drops
(which their wives might sell at home), for it had " a bad
appearance, and did not suit the dignity of their calling."
The increase of members during the year was 430. Wesley
was not satisfied with this. Hence the question :
Life and Times of Wesley.
1768 " In many places the work of God seems to stand still. What can be
done to revive and enlarge it ?"
Age 65 ,4 Answer— I. Much good has been done by the books which have been
published ; and more would be, if they were spread more effectually.
" 2. Let tlicrc be more field preaching ; without this, the work of God
will hardly increase in any place.
" 3. Let the preaching at five in the morning be constantly kept up,
wherever you can have twenty hearers. This is the glory of the
Methodists ! Whenever this is dropped, they will dwindle away into
nothing. Rising early is equally good for soul and body. It helps the
nerves better than a thousand medicines ; and, in particular, preserves the
sight, and prevents lowness of spirits, more than can be well imagined.
"4. As soon as there are four men or women believers in any place, put
them into a band. In every place where there are bands, meet them con-
stantly, and encourage them to speak without reserve.
" 5. Be conscientiously exact in the whole Methodist discipline. One
part of our discipline has been generally neglected, namely, the changing
of the stewards. This has been attended with many ill consequences ;
many stewards have been ready to ride over the preacher's head. Let
every assistant, at the next quarterly meeting, change one steward at
least, in every society, if there be therein any other man that can keep an
account.
" 6. Beware oi formality in singing, or it will creep in upon us unawares.
Is it not creeping in already, by those complex tunes which it is scarce
possible to sing with devotion 1 Such is, ' Praise the Lord, ye blessed
ones !' Such the long quavering Hallelujah, annexed to the Morning
Song tune, which I defy any man living to sing devoutly. The repeating
. the same word so often, especially while another repeats different words,
shocks all common sense, brings in dead formality, and has no more of
religion in it than a Lancashire hornpipe. Do not suffer the people to
sing too slow. This naturally tends to formality, and is brought in by
those who have very strong or very weak voices. Why should not the
assistant see, that they be taught to sing in every large society ?
" 7. Let a quarterly fast be observed in all our societies.
" 8. Which of us ' fasts every Friday in the year ' ? Which of us fasts
at all? Does not this show the present temper of our minds soft and un-
nerved? How then can we advance the work of God, though we may preach
loud zx\(S. lo)ig enough? Here is the root of the evil. Hence, the \vork
of God droops ; few are convinced, few justified, few of our brethren
sanctified ! Hence, more and more doubt if we are to be sanctified at all
till death. That we may all speak the same thing, I ask once for all,
' Shall we defend this perfection or give it up ' ? You all agree to defend
it, meanmg thereby, as we did from the beginning, salvation from all sin,
by the love of God and our neighbour filling our heart. You are all
agreed, we may be saved from all sin before death. The substance then is
settled. But as to the circumstance, is the change instantaneous or
gradual? It is both one and the other. But should we in preaching
How to Revive Religion. 23
insist upon both one and the other ? Certainly. But how far from entire 1768
sanctification are we still ! The religion of the Methodists, in general, . —
is not internal : at least, not deep, universal, uniform : but superficial,
partial, uneven. And what pains do we take to make it otherwise 1 Do
we visit from house to house, according to the plan laid down in the
minutes ? Only spend half the time in this visiting, which you spend in
talking uselessly, and you will have time enough. Uo this, particularly in
confirming and building up believers. Then, and not till then, the work
of the Lord will prosper in your hands. Unless, also, we can take care of
the rising generation, the present revival of religion will be res unius
CEtatis, it will last only the age of a man. Spend an hour a week with
the children, in every large town, whether you like it or not. Talk with
them every time you see any at home. Pray in earnest for them. Dili-
gently instruct and vehemently exhort all parents at their own houses.
Read carefully the life of Mr, Brainerd. Let us be followers of him, as he
was of Christ ; in absolute self devotion, in total deadness to the world,
and in fervent love to God and man. We want nothing but this. Then
the world and the devil must fall under our feet. Lastly, let us keep to
the Church. They that leave the Church leave the Methodists. The
clergy cannot separate us from our brethren ; the Dissenting ministers
can and do. Therefore, carefully avoid whatever has a tendency to
separate men from the Church. In particular, preaching at any hour
which hinders them from going to it. Let every assistant look to this.
Let all the servants in our preaching houses go to church on Sunday
morning at least. Let every preacher likewise go always on Sunday
morning, and, when he can, in the afternoon. God will bless those who
go on week days too, as often as they have opportunity."
Wesley's means, then, to promote a revival of the work of
God, were a diffusion of Methodist literature, field and morn-
ing preaching, the enforcement of Methodist discipline, good
singing, quarterly fasts, the preachmg of the doctrine of
Christian perfection, house to house visitation, attention to
the young, continued union with the Established Church, and,
above all and more than all, more inward and outward religion
among the preachers.
Before leaving the conference of 1768, we insert a letter,
which, so far as we are aware, has not before been published,
except in the " Methodist Pocket Book " for 1799. It was ad-
dressed to James Morgan, one of Wesley's itinerant preachers,
well read, and popular, but who had sunk into a state of
nervousness, and had settled down in the city of Dublin.
"St. Just, near the Land's End, September-},, 1768.
"Dear Jemmy, — I have been thinking much of j/^i/^y and why should
I not tell you all I think, and all I fear, concerning you .''
24 Life and Times of Wesley.
176S " I think all that you said at the conference upon the subject of the late
s~^(.f debates was right. And it amounted to no more than this : ' the general
rule is, they who are in the favour of God know they are so. But there
may be some exceptions. Some may fear and love God, and yet not be
clearly conscious of His favour ; at least, they may not dare to affirm that
their sins are forgiven.' If you put the case thus, I think no man in his
senses will be tempted to contradict you ; for none can doubt, but who-
ever loves God is in the favour of God. But is not this a little misstating
the case? I do not conceive the question turned here; but you said, or
was imagined to say, 'all penitents are m God's favour'; or, * all who
mourn after God are in the favour of God.' And this was what many dis-
liked ; because they thought it was unscriptural and unsafe, as well as con-
trary to what we had always taught. That this is contrary to what we had
always taught, is certain ; as all our hymns, as well as other writings, testify :
so that (whether it be true or not), it is, without any question, a new
doctrine among the Methodists. We have always taught, that a penitent
mourned, or was pained, on this very account, because he felt he was 'not
in the favour of God, but had the wrath of God abiding on him. Hence
we supposed the language of his heart to be, ' Lost and undone for aid I
cry'; and we believed he was really 'lost and undone,' till God did
* Peace, righteousness, and joy imp'art,
And speak Himself into his heart.'
"And I still apprehend this to be the scriptural doctrine, confirmed, not
by a few detached texts, but by the whole tenor of Scripture, and, more
particular! 3', of the Epistle to the Romans. But if so, the contrary to it
must be unsafe, for that general reason, because it is unscriptural ; to
which one may add the particular reason, that it naturally tends to lull
mourners to sleep ; to make them say, ' Peace, peace ' to their souls, when
there is no peace.
" But it may be asked, ' Will not this discourage mourners V Yes, it
will discourage them from stopping where they are ; it will discourage
them from resting, before they have the witness in themselves, before
Christ is revealed in them. But it will encourage them to seek in the
gospel way ; to ask till they receive pardon and peace. And we are
to encourage them, not by telling them they are in the favour of God,
though they do not know it ; (such a word as this we would never utter in
a congregation, at the peril of our souls ;) but by assuring them, ' Every
one that sccketh findeth, every one that asketh receivcth.'
" I am afraid you have not been sufficiently wary in this ; but have
given occasion to them that sought occasion. But this is not all. I doubt
you did not ' see God's hand in Shimci's tongue.' ' Unto you it was given
to suffer' a little of what you extremely wanted,— obloquy and evil report.
But you did not acknowledge either the gift or the Giver. You saw only
T. Olivers, not God. O Jemmy, you do not know yourself. You cannot
bear to be continually steeped in the esteem and praise of men. There-
fore, 1 tremble at your stay at Dublin; it is the most dangerous place for
Spitaljields Chapel. ' 25
you under heaven! All I can say is, God can preserve you in the fiery 1768
furnace, and I hope He will. — -
" I am, dear Jemmy, yours affectionately, ^ ^
"John Wesley."
A letter has been already inserted in which Wesley con-
gratulates his brother on the reports he had received respect-
ing the success of his ministry in London. This was some-
what premature, for, in reality, instead of there being an
increase in the London circuit, there was a decrease of seventy
members ; and there was a serious intention to abandon the
chapel in Spitalfields. Hence the following letter " to the
stewards of the Foundery."
"Pembroke, Atigust 6, 176^.
" My dear Brethren, — The thing you mention is of no small con-
cern, and ought not to be determined hastily. Indeed, it would be easy to
answer, if we considered only how to save money ; but we are to consider
also how to save souls. Now, I doubt whether we should act wisely in
this respect were we to give up the chapel in Spitalfields. We have no
other preaching place in or near that populous quarter of the town ; and a
quarter which, upon one account, I prefer before almost any other;
namely, that the people in general are more simple, and less confused by
any other preachers. I think, therefore, it would not be well to give up
this, if we could gain a thousand pounds thereby. I should look upon it
as selling the souls of men for money; which God will give us in due time
without this. That many who live near the Foundery would be glad of it
I allow, because it would save them trouble. But neither can I put the
saving of trouble in competition with the saving of souls.
" I am, my dear brethren, your affectionate brother,
"John Wesley." ^
Poor Spitalfields ! Noble Wesley ! Let the fashionable
Methodists of the present generation ponder such sentiments
as these, and hesitate before they abandon their old chapels,
because surrounded by none but the abject and the poor, and
because keeping them open involves expense and trouble.
It is a remarkable fact, that almost in the very year in
which Methodism was founded in America, it was instituted
in Newfoundland. For nine years, Laurence Coughlan was
one of Wesley's itinerants. In 1764, he was ordained by
Erasmus, the Greek bishop, and was put away from the
Methodist connexion. In 1766,^ he was reordained by the
' Wesley's Works, vol. xii., p. 359.
2 MetJiodist Magazine, 1785, p. 491.
26 Life and Times of Wesley.
1768 Bishop of London, and was sent to Newfoundland by the
y^~65 Society for the Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts. It
is true, he went as a clergyman of the Church of England, but
he took his Methodism with him, and established classes, in
which the present Methodism of Newfoundland had its origin.
In a letter to Wesley, he writes :
" I am, and do confess myself, a Methodist. The name I love, and hope
I ever shall. The plan which you first taught me, as to doctrine and dis-
cipline, I have followed. We have the sacrament once a month, and
have about two hundred communicants. This is more than all the other
missionaries in the land have: nor do I know of any who attend our
sacrament, who have not the fear of God ; and some are happy in His love.
There are some also whose mouths the Lord hath opened to give a word
of exhortation; and I hope He will raise up many more."
It would be a pleasant task to trace the steps of Mr.
Coughlan in Newfoundland ; but suffice it to remark that he
returned to England, and shortly after, while conversing with
Wesley in his study, was seized with paralysis, and suddenly
removed to his rest in heaven.^
Coughlan was one of those in London, who professed to
receive the blessing of Christian perfection ; but, like many
others, imbibed fantastic notions respecting it. Soon after the
conference of 1768, Wesley wrote to him as follows.
" Dear Laurence, — By a various train of providences you have been
led to the very place where God intended you should be ; and you have
reason to praise Him, that He has not suffered your labour there to be
in vain. In a short time, how little will it signify, whether we had lived
in the Summer Islands, or beneath
' The rage of Arctos and eternal frost !'
" How soon will this dream of life be at an end ! And when we are
once landed in eternity, it will be all one, whether we spent our time on
earth in a palace, or had not where to lay our head.
" You never learned, either from my conversation, or preaching, or
writings, that ' holiness consisted in a glow of joy.' I constantly told you
quite the contrary : I told you it was the love of God and our neighbour ;
tlic image of God stamped on the heart ; the life of God in the soul of
man ; the mind that was in Christ, enabling us to walk as Christ also
walked. If Mr. Maxfield, or you, took it to be anything else, it was your
own fault, not mine ; and, whenever you waked out of that dream,
you ought not to have laid the blame of it upon me. Perhaps you thought
' Atmore's " Memorial" ; and Methodist Magazine, 185 1, p. 869.
Methodis7n at Taunton. 27
you had received what you had not. But pray do not measure all men 1768
by yourself; do not imagine you are the universal standard. If you — -
deceived yourself, you should not mfer that all others do. Many think ^ ^
they are justified, and are not ; but we cannot infer, that none are justified.
So neither, if many think they are * perfected in love,'* and are not, will
it follow that none are so. Blessed be God, though we set a hundred
enthusiasts aside, we are still ' encompassed with a cloud of witnesses,'
who have testified, and do testify, in life and in death, that perfection
which I have taught these forty years ! This perfection cannot be a
delusion, unless the Bible be a delusion too; I mean, loving God with all
our hearts, and our neighbour as ourselves. I pin down all its opposers
to this definition of it. No evasion ! No shifting the question ! Where is
the delusion of this ? Either you received this love, or you did not. If
you did, dare you call it a delusion? If you received anything else, it
does not at all affect the question. O Laurence, if sister Coughlan and
you ever did enjoy this, humble yourselves before God for casting it
away ; if you did not, God grant you may !
* "Yours, etc.,
"John Wesley." *
Wesley had been incessantly travelling for nearly the last
six months ; but no sooner were the sessions of the Bristol
conference ended, than he started off to Cornwall, where he
spent the interval between August 26 and September 18.
On his way, he preached to a serious congregation at Taunton,
and asks, " Shall we have fruit here also } " Wesley might
well ask this. For many a long year, he had been accus-
tomed to preach at Taunton, and had been received either
with stupid indifference or active contempt. As early as
1744, he attempted to preach in the yard of the Three Cups
inn ; but had no sooner named his text, than the mayor came,
in all his full blown dignity, and ordered the proclamation to
be read, and silenced the preacher.^ Almost a quarter of a
century had elapsed since then ; and now there was a small
society, of which one of the members was Thomas Dingle, who
for sixty-three years was a chief supporter of the Taunton
society, and one of its brightest ornaments.
Wesley's labours in Cornwall were Herculean. Though
now in the sixty-sixth year of his age, for eight days together
he preached, " mostly in the open air, three or four times a
day," and says, " I hardly felt any weariness, first or last."
' Wesley's Works, vol. iii., p. 324. * Gentleman' s Magazine, 1744, p. 51.
28 Life and Times of Wesley.
1768 He was also not without adventures. At Polperro, his bed-
A~65 rooin ^^'as filled with pilchards and conger eels, which made
him glad to accept the offer of another. At Plymouth, on
his return, a "silly man talked without ceasing" during the
sermon, till Wesley desired the people " to open to the right
and left, and let him look his garrulous disturber fairly in the
face," upon which the noisy prater " pulled off his hat, and
quietly went away." Between Charlton and Lympsham, the
rivers were so swollen, that Wesley's horse had to swim, and
Wesley himself had to be taken to his lodgings on an "honest
man's shoulders."
Reaching Bristol on September 24, Wesley spent the next
few days in visiting the neighbouring towns and villages. At
Frome, he found the liveliest society that there was in the
Wiltshire circuit : a fact which greatly surprised him, because
the town was made up of a strange medley " of men of all
opinions,— anabaptists, quakers, presbyterians, Arians, anti-
nomians, Moravians, and what not." He adds : " if any hold
to the truth, in the midst of all these, surely the power must
be of God."
The Frome Methodists, however, were not untrained re-
cruits, but veteran soldiers, who had stood the brunt of many
a furious and fiery fight. Twenty-two years before this,
Methodism had been started in their town, by a poor Bristol
pedlar, who dealt in rags and small ware, singing to the people
Wesley's hymns. Since then, a vagabond barber — a tool in
the hands of the parish priest — had dragged two ]\Iethodist
women to prison. Mrs. Seagram had been fined ;^20 for
permitting her house to be used as a preaching place ; and,
not being able to pay the fine, had had all her stock in trade
and her household goods sold by public auction, while she
and her two fatherless children were turned penniless out of
doors. In one instance, the mob rushed into the preaching
room, seized the benches, and made a bonfire of them. Method-
ism in Frome had outlived all this ; and, despite the sectarian-
ism of the town, it was destined still to live and prosper.
On October 24, Wesley set out for London, and employed
the first week in November in a preaching tour through the
three counties of Hertford, Bedford, and Northampton. At
Hertford, a chapel had been built by Mr. Andrews, who after-
MetJiodisin at Oxford. 29
wards, in 1777, gave to Wesley's new chapel in City Road ^7°^
the pulpit which has been used in Methodism's cathedral Age 65
from that time to this.^
The second week inr November was spent in a similar
visitation of the societies in Oxfordshire. He writes : " I was
desired to preach at Oxford. The room was throughly
filled, and not with curious, but deeply serious hearers. Many
of these desired, that our travelling preachers would take them
in their turn ; with which I willingly complied." Oxford had
been Methodism's cradle, but the infant had long been absent.
Henceforth, Methodism was one of Oxford's institutions ;
though, for long, long years, it was a thing of feebleness anti
of small dimensions. The " Oxfordshire " circuit extended
over the greater part of Berkshire, Wiltshire, and Bucking-
hamshire ; and, even as late as 1787, there were throughout
the circuit only four Methodist chapels, namely, at Oxford,
Wycombe, Wallingford, and Witney. At Aylesbury, the
Methodists preached in the baptists' chapel ; at Newbury, in
an ironfounder's shop ; and at all the other places, in private
houses. The small chapel in Oxford was in New-Inn-Hall
Lane ; ^ and the Oxford home of the two unmarried preachers,
Joseph Entwisle and Richard Reece, was a garret in the house
of a journeyman shoemaker, for which the society paid six-
pence a week as rent ; and which had to serve them as dining
room, sitting room, bedroom, and study,^ all in one.
The third week in November was occupied in meeting the
London classes ; and the fourth in a tour in Kent. The rest
of the year was chiefly spent in town.
Wesley was fervent, but not fanatical ; he loved earnestness
in religious worship, but not disorder. Hence the following
letter to Mr, Merry weather, of Yarm.
" Lewisham, December 10, 1768.
" My dear Brother, — The matter is short : all things in Divine wor-
ship must ' be done decently and in order.' Two must never pray at the
same time, nor one interrupt another. Either Alice Brammah must take
advice, or the society must be warned to keep away from her. These
are the very things which were the beginning of poor George Bell's fall.
" I am, your affectionate brother, John Wesley." ^
' Methodist Magazine, 1825, p. 454.
2 Wesleyan Times, June 19, 1849. ^ Entwisle's Memoir, p. 31.
* Methodist Magazine, 1826, p. 464.
30 Life and Times of Wesley.
•768 Wc have already seen that, by an enormous effort, in the
r-r. month of August, Wesley hurried from Bristol to London to
visit his afflicted wife. On his return he wrote her as follows.
"My Love— I can make allowance for faintness, and weakness, and
pain. I remember when it was my own case, at this very place, and when
you spared no pains in nursing and waiting upon me, till it pleased God
to make you the chief instrument in restoring my strength. I am glad you
have the advice of a skilful physician; but you must not be surprised or
discouracred if you do not recover your strength so soon as one might
wish especially at this time of the year. What is chiefly to be desired is,
that God may sanctify all His dispensations to you, and that all may be
the means of your being more entirely devoted to Him, whose favour is
better than strength, or health, or life itself
" I am dear Molly, your ever affectionate husband,
' . "John Wesley."
No sooner was Wesley's wife convalescent, than, instead of
waiting to welcome him to his home in London, she, in one of
her in'^ane piques, took her departure to Newcastle. The
following letter to his brother refers to this, and also to his
preparing an edition of Young's "Night Thoughts," and to
other matters.
" London, December 1 7, 1 768.
" Dear Brother,— I thank you for your reproof. There is reason in
what you say. If there was not evil, there was the appearance of evil.
" Matters have not been well carried on at Liverpool ; but ' what can-
not be cured must be endured.'
" Why, you simpleton, you are cutting me out a month's work. Nay,
but I have no leisure nor inclination to write a book. I intend only : (i)
to leave out what I most dislike ; (2) to mark what I most approve of ;
(3) to prefix a short preface. And I shall run the hazard of printing it at
Bristol. There you yourself can read the proof sheets.
" You do well with regard to my sister Emily. What farther is wanting
I will supply. I hear nothing from our friend at Newcastle. I am now
a mere fellow of a college again. Adieu ! ^^ ^^^^ Wesley." ^
Wesley was still troubled on account of the chapel debts.
Nearly ^6000 had been contributed ; but there was still a
debt of ;^7728 upon the chapels in the United Kingdom
undcfraycd.2 -^X\\% gave rise to the following letter.
» Wesley's Works, vol. xii., p. 127.
a Minutes of Conference.
Chapel Debts. 31
"London, December, 1768. 1768
"My dear Brother,— Last year, Mr. H was much persuaded a~6-
that, by means of the yearly subscription, our whole debt of above ^i i,ooo '^
would be paid within two years. Many of our brethren were more san-
guine still. They were persuaded that, by generously exerting themselves^
and giving a large sum at once, it would be paid in one year. I did not
expect this ; but I would not contradict, because I would not discourage
them. The event was as I foresaw. By the noble effort which many of
our brethren made, most of the pressing debts are already discharged,
amounting in the whole to near ^7000. But a debt of about £7000 remains
upon us still. What can be done with regard to this ? I will tell you
what occurs to my mind. Many of our brethren chose to subscribe
yearly ten, five, three, two guineas, or less. I doubt not but these will
cheerfully pay the residue of their subscription, and perhaps some of them
will add a little thereto, as they see the great occasion there is for it. A few
delayed subscribing, because they wanted to see the event; supposing the
design to be impracticable, and that 'nothing good would come out of it.'
As it now appears that great good has come out of it, that many burdens
are already removed, I cannot but earnestly exhort all these now to set
their shoulders to the work. Now, at least, let them exert themselves, for
my sake, for the gospel's sake, and for the sake of their still afflicted breth-
ren, who groan under a load which they cannot well bear, and yet cannot
remove without our assistance. Several generously contributed at once,
in hope of paying the whole debt. Of them nothing more can be
required, but their prayers that others may be as openhearted as them-
selves. Nevertheless, if of their own free goodwill they see good to add
a little to their former benefactions — this, as well as the former, is lent
unto the Lord, and what they lay out shall be paid them again. Ought I not
to add, that there were some of our brethren who did not answer my ex-
pectation } I knew they were able to assist largely ; and I flattered myself
they were not less willing than able, as they owed me their own souls also,
and this was the first favour of the kind which I had requested of them.
Let me be excused from saying any more of what is past. Let them now
drop all excuses and objections, and show they love me and their brethren,
and the work of God, not in word only, but in deed and in truth. Let me
have joy over you, my brethren, in particular. You have a measure of
this world's goods, and you see your brother hath need. I have need of
your help, inasmuch as the burdens of my brethren are my own. Do not
pass by on the other side; but come and help as God has enabled you.
Do all you can to lighten the labour, and strengthen the hands, of your
affectionate brother,
" John Wesley." ^
Wesley was a great reader, as well as a great writer; and,
during the year 1768, his journal is enriched with an unusual
' A manuscript circular, signed by Wesley himself.
32 Life and Times of Wesley.
1768 number of his critical remarks. A few may be given as
A^e~65 specimens of others.
"January 11.— This week I spent my scraps of time in reading Mr.
Wodrow's ' History of the Sufferings of the Church of Scotland.' It would
transcend belief, but that the vouchers are too authentic to admit of any
exception. O what a blessed governor was that goodnatured man, so
called. King Charles the Second ! Bloody Queen Mary was a lamb, a
mere dove, in comparison of him!"
"April 29. — I read over an extremely sensible book, but one that sur-
prised me much : ' An Inquiry into the Proofs of the Charges commonly
advanced against Mary Queen of Scotland.' By means of original papers,
the author has made it clear : (i) That she was altogether innocent of the
murder of Lord Darnley, and no way privy to it. (2) That she married
Lord Bolhwell (then near seventy years old, herself but four-and-twenty),
from the pressing instance of the nobility in a body, who, at the same
time, assured her he was innocent of the king's murder. (3) That Murray,
Morton, and Lethington, themselves contrived that murder, in order to
charge it upon her; as well as forged those vile letters and sonnets which
they palmed upon the world for hers. ' But how then can we account for
the quite contrary story, which has been almost universally received V
Most easily. It was penned and published in French, English, and Latin,
(by Queen Elizabeth's order,) by George Buchanan, who was secretary to
Lord Murray and in Queen Elizabeth's pay; so he was sure to throw
dirt enough. Nor was she at liberty to answer for herself. ' But what
then was Queen Elizabeth ?' As just and merciful as Nero, and as good
a Christian as Mahomet."
" May 20.— I went on reading that fine book, Bishop Butler's
'Analogy.' But I doubt it is too hard for most of those for whom it is
chietly intended. Freethinkers, so called, are seldom close thinkers.
They will not be at the pains of reading such a book as this. One that
would profit them must dilute his sense, or they will neither swallow
nor digest it."
"November 19. — I read Dr. Nowell's answer to Mr. Hill, concerning
the expulsion of the students at Oxford. He has said all that could be
said for that stretch of power; and he says quite enough, to clear the
Church of England from the charge of predestination: a doctrine which
he proves to be utterly inconsistent with the Common Prayer, the
Communion Service, the Office of Baptism, the articles, the homilies,
and the other writings of those that compiled them."
The last extract refers to a matter too nearly allied to
Methodism to be passed without further notice.
" On the 1 2th of March, 1768, six students belonging to Edmund hall,
Oxford, were expelled the university, for holding Methodistical tenets, and
taking upon them to pray, read or expound the Scriptures, and sing
hymns in private houses. The principal of the hall, Dr. Dixon, defended
Expulsion of Oxfoj'd Students.
their doctrines from the thirty-nine articles of the Established Church, 1768
and spoke in the highest terms of their piety and the exemplariness of — -
their lives ; but sentence was pronounced against them. Dr. Nowell, '^ ■'
one of the heads of houses present, observed, that as these six gentlemen
were expelled for having too much religion, it would be very proper to
inquire into the conduct of some who had too little." ^
The expelled students were Benjamin Kay, Thomas Jones,
Thomas Grove, Erasmus Middleton, Joseph Shipman, and
James Mathews. The junta of expellers were Drs. Durell,
Randolph, Fothergill, Nowell, and Atterbury.^ The charges
brought against the young culprits were : i. That they had
held or frequented illicit conventicles, where some of them,
though not in orders, had preached and prayed extempore,
particularly in the house of a staymaker, a woman who herself
officiated and taught. 2. That some of them had been bred
up to the lowest trades and occupations, for one had been a
weaver and kept a taphouse, a second had been a barber, a
third a draper ; and further all were wholly illiterate, and in-
capable of performing the statutable exercises of the univer-
sity ; and were maintained at the charge of persons suspected
of enthusiasm. 3. That they were attached to the sect called
Methodists, and held .their doctrines, namely, "that faith
without works is sufficient for salvation ; that there is no
necessity for good works ; that the immediate impulse of the
Spirit is to be waited for ; that once a child of God always a
child of God ; and the like." 4. That one of them, before his
entrance into the university, had preached, and, in defiance of
his father's authority, had connected himself with the Method-
ists. 5. That some of them had behaved very irreverently
and disrespectfully to their tutor, and had industriously sought
to cavil with and to vex him.^
It is right to add, that none of these young men had been
connected with Wesley. Mr. Jones, the barber, had, for some
time resided, with the Rev. John Newton, and, under his in-
struction, had made considerable progress in the Greek and
Hebrew languages. Mr. Kay was of a respectable family, and
an excellent scholar, and had an exhibition paid by the Iron-
' Londojt Magazine. 1 768, p. 1 25.
2 Philip's Life of Whitefield, p. 492.
^ Londo7i Magazine, 1768, p. 214.
VOL. in. D
34 Life and Times of Wesley.
1768 mongers' Company. Mr. Mathews had been instructed by
A^6s l''l«-"tchcr of Madclcy. Mr. Middlcton had been under the
tutelaj'-c of the Rev. Thomas Hawcis. Of Mr. Grove and Mr.
Shipman we know nothing, except that the latter, after his
expulsion, was admitted to the college of the Countess of
Huntingdon, at Trevecca.
This act of Oxford tyranny, as might be expected, created
great commotion ; and numbers of tracts and pamphlets, pro
and con, were published. Among others, Whitefield rushed
into the battle, in a " Letter to the Rev. Dr. Durell," 8vo, 50
pages, and defended the expelled with great vigour and effect ;
as also did Dr. Home, afterwards bishop of Norwich. Mac-
gowan published his " Shaver," in which he shaved the collegi-
ate rulers with no gentle hand, and, in the process, must have
made them smart. Sir Richard Hill, a young man of thirty-six,
who for some time past had been using his utmost endeavours
to improve Oxford morality, issued his "Pietas Oxoniensis,"
8vo, 85 pages, in which he belaboured the junta with unsparing
severity. Several replies were written in justification of the
Oxford bull ; and, after an immense expenditure of time, and
not a little display of angry temper, this execrable act of the
Oxford authorities was allowed to repose in silence. It is
a fact, however, far too serious to be forgotten, that while
Oxford university, in past days, has tolerated in its students
the most notorious wickedness, and while, at the present day,
it tolerates German scepticism and Romish heresy, it once, in
one of its paroxysms of pious zeal, ignominiously expelled six
young men, whose only crimes were, that some of them had
been ignobly bred, and all had sung, and prayed, and read the
Scriptures in private houses.
The Countess of Huntingdon was accused of maintaining
some or all of these young students at the Oxford university ;
and perhaps there was a modicum of truth in this. Be that
as it may, she soon made her young preachers independent of
Oxford help. Trevecca House, in the parish of Talgarth, in
Wales, was an ancient structure, supposed to have been
erected about the year 1176. This building the countess
opened as a college, five months after the expulsions just
mentioned, — on the 24th of August, 1768, the anniversary of
her ladyship's birthday. Whitefield preached at the opening ;
College at Trevecca. 35
Fletcher was made the president; and, for a few months, 1768
Mr. Easterbrook the head master; when Joseph Benson was Age~65
appointed his successor. Of course, Fletcher was not expected
to relinquish his charge at Madeley ; but he was to attend
the college at Trevecca as often as he conveniently could ; to
give advice, with regard to the appointment of masters, and
the adm^ission or exclusion of students ; to oversee their studies
and conduct ; to assist their piety ; and to judge of their
qualifications for the ministry.^ As is well known, both
Fletcher and Benson soon retired, because of the doctrinal
differences that sprang up ; but Trevecca was still used as a
seminary for the training of Calvinistic ministers, till 1792,
when the institution was removed to Cheshunt, in Hertford-
shire. Wesley from the beginning was in doubt of it, though,
perhaps, without reason. In a letter to his brother, dated
"May 19, 1768," he writes: "I am glad Mr. Fletcher has
been with you. But if the tutor fails, what will become of
our college at Trevecca .'' Did you ever see anything more
queer than their plan of institution } Pray who penned it,
man or woman .'' I am afraid the visitor too will fail." ^ Was
there a tinge of jealousy in this .'* We know not. Troubles,
it is true, soon sprung up ; but the countess made Trevecca
her principal place of residence ; and within its walls were
trained a noble band of earnest, laborious, and useful minis-
ters. The old building is now the residence of a Celtic farmer.^
O temporal O mores!
Excepting the hubbub arising out of the Oxford expul-
sions, there was not much, in 1768, that was antagonistic
to the Methodist movement. A small, paltry pamphlet
was published, with the title, " Enthusiasm Reprehended.
Three Letters to Mr. John Wesley. With Strictures on
his Character, the Reception he met with at Perth, and his
Conduct on that occasion." A i2mo volume, of 212
pages, was also issued, entitled " Sermons to Asses " ; and
was dedicated to Whitefield, Wesley, Romaine, and Madan.
Besides these, an eighteenpenny poem was published,
entitled "The Hypocrite: a comedy;" in which the writer
* Wesley's Works, vol. xii., p. 281. * Ibid. vol. xii., p. 126.
^ " Life and Times of Hovvel Harris," p. 246.
o
6 Life and Times of Wesley.
T7^>8 tries to turn Gibber's satire on disloyalty into a castigation
A<;c6'; of enthusiasm.
Wesley's publications also were fewer than usual, and
hardly any of them original. The following belong to this
period.
1. " A Letter to the Rev. Dr. Rutherforth." This has been
already noticed in a previous chapter.
2. " A Caution to False Prophets : a Sermon on Matthew
vii. 15-20. Particularly recommended to the people called
Methodists." i2mo, 12 pages. In this sermon, Wesley discusses
a point which he confesses had puzzled him for many years,
namely, whether it is right to hear a minister who is either
immoral, or who preaches false doctrine. He still hesitates
to pronounce an opinion, and recommends those who were in
doubt to "wait upon God in prayer, and then act according
to the best light they had."
3. "Instructions for Members of Religious Societies. Trans-
lated from the French." Under the date of February 26,
1768, Wesley writes : " I translated from the French one of
the most useful tracts I ever saw, for those who desire to be
' fervent in spirit' How little does God regard men's opinions!
What a multitude of wrong opinions are embraced by all the
members of the Church of Rome ! Yet how highly favoured
have many of them been ! "
4. "An Extract from the Rev. Mr. Law's Later Works."
Two vols., i2mo, 251 and 204 pages. About a quarter of a
century before this, Wesley had published an extract from
Law's " Christian Perfection " ; an extract from his " Serious
Call " ; and an extract from his " Serious Answer to Dr.
Trapp." He now published similar extracts from Law's
answer to " Christianity as old as Creation," his " Spirit of
Prayer," his " Spirit of Love," his " Letters," and his " Ad-
dress to the Clergy."
5. "An Extract of the Life of the late Rev. David Brainerd."
l2mo, 274 pages. Just at the time when Methodism was ex-
tending its mission to America and Newfoundland, Wesley
issued his life of one of the most devoted missionaries that
ever lived : a young man who died before he arrived at the
age of thirty ; but whose piety, for depth and fervour, has
seldom been excelled ; and whose four years' mission among
John Wilkes.
the Delaware and other Indians, from 1743 to 1747, would 1768
warm the heart and improve the character of all candidates ^^(^r
for missionary work.
Besides the above, another publication belongs to the year
1768, — "Free Thoughts on the Present State of Public Affairs,"
i2mo, 47 pages. This, strictly speaking, was Wesley's first
political pamphlet. At the general election of 1768, John
Wilkes, at the time an outlaw, was returned to parliament by
the county of Middlesex ; and, shortly after, was arrested
and committed to the King's Bench prison. For nearly a
fortnight, crowds collected outside the prison walls, and sol-
diers were sent to protect the place. A riot followed ; the
soldiers fired ; six of the rioters were killed, and fourteen
badly wounded ; and the exploit got the name of the " Mas-
sacre of St. George's Fields." For months, Wilkes's business
occupied the attention of court and cabinet; when the wretched
demagogue was sentenced to pay a fine of ;{J"iooo, to be
imprisoned for two-and-twenty months, and afterwards to
find security for good behaviour for seven years. While in
prison, he was at the zenith of his fame ; subscriptions were
opened for the payment of his debts ; and his likenesses were
so multiplied, that portraits of him squinted from the sign-
boards of half the public houses in the kingdom.
It was in the midst of such a state of things, that Wesley
wrote the pamphlet already mentioned. He admits that, though
"cobblers, tinkers, porters, and hackney coachmen" think them-
selves wise enough "to instruct both the king and his council,"
he himself is " not so deeply learned. Politics were beyond
his province; but he would use the privilege of an Englishman
to speak his naked thoughts." " I have," he writes, " no bias,
one way or the other. I have no interest depending. I want
no man's favour, having no hopes, no fears, from any man."
He then proceeds to defend the character of the king ; and
maintains that, as an outlaw, Wilkes was incapacitated to
take a seat in the House of Commons. " Encumbered with
no religion, and disappointed in his application for place and
power, Wilkes had set up for patriot, vehemently inveighed
against evil counsellors and grievances, and was paid in
French louis d'or for his agitative services." Wesley then
expresses the opinion that, "supposing things to take their
38 Life and Times of Wesley.
1768 natural course, they must go from bad to worse; the land
jX^C^ will become a field of blood ; and many thousands of poor
Englishmen will sheathe their swords in each other's bowels,
for the diversion of their good neighbours. Then, either a
commonwealth will ensue, or else a second Cromwell. One
must be; but it cannot be determined which, — King Wilkes,
or King Mob."
1769.
TERRIBLE was the political excitement at the commence- 1769
ment of 1769. It was now, that the first of the cele- a^66
brated letters of "Junius" appeared in the columns of the
Public Advertiser, These withering invectives became, to a great
extent, the political textbook of the nation. For years past,
Ireland also had been turbulent, split into factions, and overrun
by hordes of Levellers and Whiteboys, Oakboys and Hearts
of Steel, all bound together by secret oaths, and a detestation
of paying tithes. The kingdom was full of wicked wits and
scoffers ; and jokes, repartees, bomnots, and sarcasms, none of
them distinguished for their loyalty, began to spice a large
number of the newspapers, periodicals, and pamphlets of the
period. Never was Methodism more greatly needed than
now.
Whitefield's work in England was nearly ended. He and
Wesley were still united in bonds of ardent friendship. The
latter writes : "January 9, 1769 — I spent a comfortable and
profitable hour with Mr. Whitefield, in calling to mind the
former times, and the manner wherein God prepared us for a
work which it had not then entered into our hearts to conceive."
On the day following, Wesley preached in the house of the
Countess of Huntingdon, in Portland Row, and Whitefield
administered the sacrament.^ And seven weeks later, Wesley
wrote again : " February 27 — I had one more agreeable con-
versation with my old friend and fellow labourer, George
Whitefield. His soul appeared to be vigorous still, but
his body was sinking apace ; and, unless God interposes
with His mighty hand, he must soon finish his labours."
For six months more, Whitefield rambled over England,
preaching three or four times every week, and exclaiming, as
though his youthful zest was unabated, " Field preaching,
field preaching for ever."^ At the beginning of September,
* "Life and Times of Countess of Huntingdon," vol. ii., p. 126.
- Whitefield's Works, vol. lii., p. 387.
40 Life and Times of Wesley.
1769 he embarked for Georgia, and addressed to Wesley the
Ai;e 66 following farewell letter.
" The Downs, on board the Friendship, Captain Ball,
Sepionbcr 12, 1769.
" Reverend and very dear Sir, — What hath God wrought /<priis, in
us, by us\ I sailed out of these Downs almost thirty-three years ago ! Oh
the height, the depth, the length, the breadth of Thy love, O God ! Surely
it passeth knowledge. Help, help, O heavenly Father, to adore what we
cannot fully comprehend ! I am glad to hear, that you had such a
pentecost season at the college ; one would hope, that these are earnests
of good things to come, and that our Lord will not yet remove His candle-
stick from among us. Duty is ours. Future things belong to Him, who
always did, and always will order all things well,
* Leave to His sovereign swaj'.
To choose and to command ;
So shall we wondering own His way,
How wise, how strong His hand.'
"Mutual Christian love will not permit you, and those in connection
with you, to forget a willing pilgrim, going now across the Atlantic for
the thirteenth time. At present, I am kept from staggering; being fully
persuaded, that the voyage will be for the Redeemer's glory, and the wel-
fare of precious and immortal souls. Oh to be kept from flagging in the
latter stages of our road ! Ipse, Deo volente, seqicar, etsi non passibiis
crqiiis. Cordial love and respect await your brother, and all that are so
kind as to inquire after, and be concerned for,
" Reverend and very dear sir,
" Less than the least of all,
'' George Whitefield." >
Thus the old friends parted, not to meet again, till they met
in heaven. Twelve months afterwards, the great orator was
dead.
Wesley spent the month of January in meeting the London
classes, and in a visit to Sheerness and Chatham. In
February, he made a tour to Norfolk ; and, on the 6th of
March, set out for Ireland, and arrived in Dublin on the 22nd.
Here we pause, to insert two of his letters to two of his
female correspondents. The first was addressed to Lady
Maxwell, and refers to a subject of some interest, though one
on which opinions will differ.
"London, March 3, 1769.
" My dear Ladv, — I have heard my mother say, ' I have frequently
^ Methodist Magazine, 1783, p. 2 73r
Letter to a Female Preacher. 41
been as fully assured, that my father's spirit was with me, as if I had seen 1768
him with my eyes.' But she did not explain herself any further. I have a~66
myself many times found, on a sudden, so lively an apprehension of a
deceased friend, that I have sometimes turned about to look ; at the
same time, I have felt an uncommon affection for them. But I never had
anything of this kind with regard to any but those that died in faith. In
dreams, I have had exceeding lively conversations with them; and I
doubt not but they were then very near.
" I am, my dear lady, your ever affectionate servant,
"John Wesley."^
The next was addressed to Sarah Crosby, the female
preacher,
"Chester, March 18, 1769.
" My dear Sister,— The westerly winds detain me here. When I am
in Ireland, you have only to direct to Dublin, and the letter will find
me.
" I advise you, as I did Grace Walton formerly — i. Pray in private or
pubhc as much as you can. 2. Even in public, you may properly
enough intermix short exhortations with prayer; but keep as far from
what is called preaching as you can; therefore, never take a text; never
speak in a continued discourse, without some break, above four or five
minutes. Tell the people, ' We shall have another prayermeeting at
such a time and place.' If Hannah Harrison had followed these few
directions, she might have been as useful now as ever.
" As soon as you have time, write more particularly and circum-
stantially; and let sister Bosanquet do the same. There is now no
hindrance in the way ; nothing to hinder you speaking as freely as you
please to, dear Sally, your affectionate brother,
"John Wesley." 2
Trouble awaited Wesley in Dublin. James Morgan and
Thomas Olivers had quarrelled,^ and the society had suffered
loss. Besides this, says Wesley, " I was summoned, by a poor
creature who fed my horse three or four times while I was on
board. For this service he demanded ten shillings. I gave
him half-a-crown. When I informed the court of this, he was
sharply reproved. Let all beware of these land sharks on o}xx
sea coasts !"
On the 3rd of April, Wesley left Dublin for the provinces.
At Armagh, for the first time in his life, he preached in a
stable. At Kinnard, he met an old acquaintance, Archdeacon
^ Wesley's Works, vol. xii., p. 321. ^ ibid a'oI. xii., p. 33 1.
^Taylor's "Redeeming Grace," p. 49; and Wesley's Works, vol. iii.,
P- 35°-'
42 Life and Times of Wesley.
^7^9 C c, and, at his request, opened a new church, which had
Aye 66 just been built. At Londonderry, he had, what he calls, "a
brilliant congregation," but says: "Such a sight gives me no
great pleasure ; as I have very little hope of doing them good :
only 'with God all things are possible.' In no other place in
Ireland has more pains been taken by the most able of our
preachers. And to how little purpose ! Bands they have
none : four-and-forty persons in society ! The greater part of
these heartless and cold. The audience in general dead as
stones." At Manorhamilton, "all behaved well," says he,
" but one young gentlewoman, who laughed almost incessantly.
She knew there was nothing to laugh at ; but she thought she
laughed prettily." At Cork, the society had been gradually
decreasing for seven years, until now the number of mem-
bers was reduced from 400 to 190. At Portarlington, the
society once had a hundred and thirty members ; now it had
only twenty-four.
Fourteen weeks were spent in traversing all parts of Ireland.
In some places, there was declension and great discourage-
ment ; in many, Wesley's ministry was accompanied with
amazing power ; in none, did he meet with brutal persecution.
Occasionally a giddy girl would laugh, or an empty headed man
Avould sneer ; but the days of sticks and stones were over.
Wesley returned to Dublin on the 15th of July ; met his Irish
preachers in conference ; and then, on July 24, embarked
for England ; having to open his English conference at Leeds
on August I. Before reviewing its proceedings, some further
extracts must be given from his correspondence.
The first letter is remarkable. We have scarcely met with
another like it. The fastidious may object to some of its
expressions; but it must be remembered that, though Wesley
always employed plainness of speech, he rarely employed
coarseness. Besides, desperate cases require desperate reme-
dies. In this instance, ordinary language, in all likelihood,
would have been useless. The Irish Methodists were far from
faultless; and Hugh Saunderson, to whom the letter was
addressed, and who had just commenced his itinerancy in the
Armagh circuit, was far from being a model of perfection.
More than once had Wesley to remonstrate witlji him for his
irregularities ; and, in 1777, had to expel him. On one occa-
Hugh Saunderson. 43
sion, in 1774, Wesley himself was actually arrested on account 1769
of Saunderson's peccant conduct. The charge was, that the _^oe 66
man had robbed his wife " of ;^ioo in money, and upwards of
iJ"30 in goods ; and had, beside that, terrified her into mad-
ness ; so that, through want of her help, and the loss of
business," the prosecutor, George Sutherland, " was damaged
i^500." It was farther alleged, that Saunderson was one of
Wesley's preachers, and that the two, to evade Mrs. Saunder-
son's pursuit, were preparing to fly the country. On such a
pretext Wesley was actually arrested, and taken to the Edin-
burgh Tolbooth, where he had to wait till his friends gave bail
for his appearance. This was done ; the case was tried ; and
Mr. Sutherland, the prosecutor, was fined ;^iooo. Of Saun-
derson's guilt we know nothing ; but, three years afterwards,
Wesley expelled him from his connexion ; and the man first
set up at Edinburgh, and then divided the society at
Exeter, where he " pitched his standard and declared open
war." ^ Such was the culprit to whom Wesley sent the
letter following.
" April 24, 1 769.
" Dear Brother,— I shall now tell you the things which have been
more or less upon my mind, ever since I have been in the north of Ireland.
If you forget them, you will be a sufferer, and so will the people; if you
observe them, it will be for the good of both.
" I. To begin with little things. If you regard your health, touch no
supper, but a little milk or water gruel. This will entirely, by the blessing
of God, secure you from nervous disorders ; especially, if you rise early
every morning, whether you preach or no.
" 2. Be steadily serious. There is no country upon earth where this is
more necessary than Ireland ; as you generally are encompassed with
those who, with a little encouragement, would laugh or trifle from morning
to night.
"3. In every town, visit all you can from house to house. I say all you
can ; for there will be some whom you cannot visit ; and if you examine,
instruct, reprove, exhort, as need requires, you will have no time hanging
on your hands. It is by this means, that the societies are increased wher-
ever T. R. goes ; he is preaching from morning to night, warning every
one, that he may present every one perfect in Christ Jesus.
" 4. But on this, and every other occasion, avoid all familiarity with
women. This is a deadly poison, both to tliein and you. You cannot be
too wary in this respect. Therefore begin from this hour.
" 5. The chief matter of your conversation, as well as your preaching,
^ Wesley's Works, vol. iv., pp. 16, 173, 222.
44 Life and Times of Wesley.
1769 should doubtless be tlic weightier matters of the law. Yet, there are
. ~~ - several comparatively little things, which you should earnestly inculcate
from time to time ; for ' he that despiseth small things shall fall by little
and little.' Such are —
"(i) Be active, be diligent; avoid all laziness, sloth, indolence. Fly
from every degree, every appearance of it ; else you will never be more
than half a Christian.
" (2) Be cleanly. In this let the Methodists take pattern by the
Quakers. Avoid all nastiness, dirt, slovenliness, both in your person,
clothes, house, all about you. Do not stink above ground. This is a bad
fruit of laziness. Use all diligence to be clean.
" (3) Whatever clothes you wear let them be whole : no rents, no
tatters, no rags. These are a scandal to either man or woman ; being
another fruit of vile laziness. Mend your clothes, or I shall never expect
you to mend your lives. Let none ever see a ragged Methodist.
" (4) Clean yourselves of lice. These are a proof both of uncleanness
and laziness. Take pains in this. Do not cut off your hair, but clean it,
and keep it clean.
" (5) Cure yourselves and your family of the itch, A spoonful of brim-
stone will cure you. To let this run from year to year, proves both sloth
and uncleanness. Away with it at once. Let not the north be any longer
a proverb of reproach to all the nation.
" (6) Use no tobacco unless prescribed by a physician. It is an
uncleanly and unwholesome self indulgence ; and the more customary it
is, the more resolutely should you break off from every degree of that vile
custom.
" (7) Use no snuff unless prescribed by a physician, I suppose no other
nation in Europe is in such vile bondage to this silly, nasty, dirty custom,
as the Irish are; but let the Christians be in this bondage no longer.
Assert your liberty, and that all at once ; nothing will be done by degrees.
But just now you may break loose, through Christ strengthening you.
" (8) Touch no dram. It is liquid fire. It is a sure, though slow poison.
It saps the very springs of life. In Ireland, above all countries in the
world, I would sacredly abstain from this, because the evil is so general.
To this, and snuff, and smoky cabins, I impute the blindness which is so
exceeding common throughout the nation,
" I might have inserted under the second article, what I particularly
desire, wherever you have preaching, namely, that there may be a little
house. Let this be got without delay. Wherever it is not, let none expect
to see me.
" I am, your affectionate brother,
" John Wesley." ^
No apology is needed for the publication of this letter ; for
Wesley himself published it in his Armima7i Mamzine. Its
^ Methodist Magazine, 1784, p. 165.
Conference of i']6(). 45
picture of the Irish and of the Irish Methodists is far from 1769
being fragrant and pleasant ; but it was doubtless true, and Age 66
shows that Wesley was a great reformer in more respects
than one. All the Irish Methodists, however, must not be
included in the company above alluded to. The excep-
tions were not few, but many, and some of them distinguished.
One of these was Mrs. Elizabeth Bennis, the first Methodist
in Limerick, in 1749, a lady of respectability and intelli-
gence, long the correspondent of Wesley, and who continued
one of his devoted followers till her death in 1802.^ The fol-
lowing letter was addressed to her during Wesley's present
visit to the sister island, and refers to an unfounded opinion
which Wesley had now renounced.
" Cork, May 30, 1769.
" Dear Sister, — Some years since, I was inclined to think that none,
who had once enjoyed and then lost the pure love of God, must ever look
to enjoy it again till they were just stepping into eternity. But experience
has taught us better things. We have, at present, numerous instances of
those who have cast away that unspeakable blessing, and now enjoy it in
a larger measure than ever. And should not this be your case ? Because
you are unworthy ? So were they. Because you have been an unfaithful
steward "i So had they been also ; yet, God healed them freely ; and so
He will you, only do not reason against Him. Forget yourself. Worthy is
the Lamb : you shall not die, but live, live all the life of heaven on earth.
You need nothing, in order to this, but faith ; and who gives this? He
that standeth at the door.
" Let there nevermore be any reserve between you and your truly affec-
tionate brother, ,, ^^^^ Wesley." 2
Wesley arrived in Leeds on Saturday, July 29, and on
Sunday, the 30th, preached, for the Rev. Henry Crook, in
Hunslet church, morning and afternoon. Mr. Crook was an
old friend of the two Wesleys. As early as 1756, Charles
Wesley preached in his church at Hunslet, and speaks of
hundreds of communicants, most of whom had been awakened
under Mr. Crook's faithful ministry."'
The conference, at Leeds, opened on the ist of August,
and " a more loving one," says Wesley, " we never had."
The Intelligencer newspaper, of August 8, tells the public,
^ Irish Evangelist, May, 1862.
^ Wesley's Works, vol. xii., p. 362.
^ C. Wesley's Journal, vol. ii., p. 117.
46 Life and Times of Wesley.
1769 that, "for a week past, Wesley had held a kind of visitation,
Agc66 but what they call a conference, with several hundreds of his
preachers, from most parts of Great Britain and Ireland, where
he settled their several routes for the succeeding year." It
further states, that " a large sum of money" was collected for
the purpose of "sending missionaries to America." ^
This was the " tall talk" of a newspaper. " Wesley's itine-
rant preachers" throughout the entire kingdom were only one
hundred and eleven in number; and the "large sum" collected
for sending missionaries to America was ;^70, of which ;^50
was to be appropriated to the payment of the debt on the
chapel in New York,
Above two days of the time of the conference were spent in
the arrangement of temporal matters, — a thing which annoyed
Wesley, who therefore directed that, in future, as much of
such business as possible should be done by the secretaries
before the conference met.
The two topics of most interest were Methodist missions,
and the perpetuation of the Methodist system after Wesley's
death.
It is a fact worth remembering, that already, for years past,
Methodism had been planted in the West Indian islands, by
means of Nathaniel Gilbert and his co-workers. Laurence
Coughlan had recently taken it to Newfoundland ; and a few
soldiers had established it at Gibraltar, where there were thirty-
two members, fifteen of whom were rejoicing in the conscious-
ness of personal pardon.^ They had preaching every night
and every morning, their preachers being " Brother Morton,"
Henry Ince, of the 2nd Regiment, and Henry Hall, of the
Royal Scots ; six classmeetings were held every week, and
the work was prospering.^ Lord Cornwallis, the command-
ing officer, issued a garrison order on June 9, 1769, as
follows : — " Whereas divers soldiers and inhabitants assemble
themselves every evening to prayer, it is the governor's posi-
tive order, that no person whatever presume to molest them.
nor go into their meeting to behave indecently there
" 4
^ Smith's History of Methodism, vol. i., p. 380,
' Methodist Mas^azine, 1784, p. 112.
•'' Smith's History of Methodism, vol. i., p. 387.
* Rule's "Memoir of a Mission to Gibraltar," p.
MetJiodisin in America. 47
Wesley was acquainted with this ; but not a word is found ^7^9
in the conference minutes concerning it. The truth is, while Age 66
Methodism was now really planted in the West Indies, New-
foundland, Gibraltar, and America, none needed help except
America, and, hence, none else are mentioned.
Wesley, his brother, Ingham, and Whitefield had all been
in America ; and Whitefield was about to go again. The
work was begun in Georgia by the Wesleys. At the same
time, occurred the revival in New England, under Mr. Edwards
and others. Whitefield came, and not only preached in
both, but likewise all the way between, a distance of many
hundred miles. Hundreds, perhaps thousands, were converted
by his ministry ; but, for want of organisation and discipline,
the greater part of them had backslidden.^ Such was the
state of things in 1769.
Four years before this, a small number of Methodist emi-
grants from Ireland had landed in New York, one of them
being Philip Embury. In 1766, another Methodist family
followed, of the name of Heck. Mrs. Barbara Heck was dis-
tressed to find that her predecessors had greatly declined in
godliness. At her request, Philip Embury began to preach ;
just at that juncture. Captain Webb, the barrackmaster at
Albany, joined him ; a chapel was built ; a society formed ;
and help was asked from England.^ Hence the thirteenth
question at the conference of 1769 : "We have a pressing call
from our brethren at New York, who have built a preaching
house, to come over and help them. Who is willing to
go 1 " Answer : " Richard Boardman and Joseph Pilmoor."
Q. " What can we do further in token of our brotherly love }
A. " Let us now make a collection among ourselves. This
^ Wesley's Works, vol. vii., p. 392.
2 About the same time, Thomas Bell, at Charlestown, wrote as follows :
" Mr. Wesley says, the first message of the preachers is to the lost sheep
of England. And are there none in America ? They have strayed from
England into the wqld woods here, and they are running wild after this
world. They are drinking their wine in bowls, and are jumping and
dancing, and serving the devil, in the groves and under the green trees.
And are not these lost sheep ? And will none of the preachers come
here ? Where is Mr. Brownfield ? Where is John Pavvson ? Where is
Nicholas Manners ? Are they living, and will they not come ?"— (" The
Centenary of Methodism," published by the Primitive Methodists in
Ireland, in 1839, p. 189.)
48 Life and Times of Wesley.
1769 was immediately done ; and, out of it, £^0 were allotted to-
A^66 wards the payment of their debt, and about ;!^20 given to our
brethren for their passage."
It is doubtful, however, whether this was, as is generally
supposed, the first collection which the Methodists made on
behalf of their American mission. Six months before this,
Wesley had permitted Robert Costerdine, who was then the
assistant in the Sheffield circuit, to " read ptiblidy, on any
Sunday he liked, the letter which had been received from
New York, and to " receive what the hearers were willing to
give." ^ It is more than possible, that this was done ; but, be
that as it may, Boardman and Pilmoor set sail, and, after a
nine weeks' passage, entered upon their work : Pilmoor at
Philadelphia, and Boardman at New York. At Philadelphia,
they found Captain Webb and a society of about a hundred
members, to whom, and to thousands more, Pilmoor com-
menced preaching from the grand stand erected on the race-
course. At New York, Boardman says, the chapel would
contain about 1700 hearers ; and that about a third part of
the congregations got in, and the other two thirds were glad
to hear without.^
Space forbids further details, except to add that, two years
afterwards, the number of Methodists in America w^as
reported in the minutes of conference as 316 ; and that even
a thing so innocent as sending preachers to America was too
important for the wicked to pass without a sneer. Hence, in
a squib, the public were informed, that the following promo-
tions in the Church were about to be declared : " Rev. G.
Whitefield, Archbishop of Boston ; Rev. W. Romaine, Bishop
of New York ; Rev. J, Wesley, Bishop of Pennsylvania ; Rev.
M. Madan, Bishop of the Carolinas; Rev. W. Shirley, Bishop
of Virginia; and Rev. C. Wesley, Bishop of Nova Scotia." It
was added, that as his majesty would soon have the livings of
these gentlemen at his disposal, he intended to provide for
Dr. Dodd, and other court celebrities,''^ anxious to fill im-
portant places.
* Methodist Magazine, 1845, P- 578-
* Ibid. 1783, p. 276; and 1784, p. 163.
^ Lloyd's Evening Post, May 26, 1769.
Scheme to perpetuate MetJiodism. 49
The other important matter brought before the conference 1769
of 1769 was the perpetuation of Methodism after Wesley's Age~66
death ; and, on Friday, August 4, Wesley read the following
paper.
" My dear Brethren, — i. It has long been my desire, that all those
ministers of our Church, who believe and preach salvation by faith, might
cordially agree between themselves, and not hinder but help one another.
After occasionally pressing this, in private conversation, wherever I had
opportunity, I wrote down my thoughts upon the head, and sent them to
each in a letter. Out of fifty or sixty, to whom I wrote, only three vouch-
safed me an answer. So I give this up. I can do no more. They are a
rope of sand, and such they will continue,
" 2. But it is otherwise with the travelling preachers in our con-
nexion. You are at present one body. You act in concert with each other,
and by united counsels. And now is the time to consider what can be
done, in order to continue this union. Indeed, as long as I live, there
will be no great difficulty. I am, under God, a centre of union to all our
travelling, as well as local preachers. They all know me and my com-
munication. They all love me for my works' sake , and, therefore,
were it only out of regard to me, they will continue connected with each
other. But by what means may this connection be preserved, when God
removes me from you ?
"3. I take it for granted, it cannot be preserved, by any means, between
those who have not a single eye. Those who aim at anything but the
glory of God, and the salvation of men ; who desire or seek any earthly
thing, whether honour, profit, or ease, will not, cannot continue in the
connexion ; it will not answer their design. Some of them, perhaps a
fourth of the whole number, will procure preferment m the Church.
Others will turn Independents, and get separate congregations, like John
Edwards and Charles Skelton. Lay your accounts with this, and be not
surprised if some, you do not suspect, be of this number.
" 4. But what method can be taken, to preserve a firm union between
those who choose to remain together ? Perhaps you might take some
such steps as these. On notice of my death, let all the preachers, in
England and Ireland, repair to London within six weeks. Let them seek
God by solemn fasting and prayer. Let them draw up articles of agree-
ment, to be signed by those who choose to act in concert. Let those be
dismissed, who do not choose it, in the most friendly manner possible.
Let them choose by votes a committee of three, five, or seven, each of
whom is to be moderator in his turn. Let the committee do what I do
now ; propose preachers to be tried, admitted, or excluded ; fix the place
of each preacher for the ensuing year, and the time of next conference.
" 5. Can anything be done now, in order to lay a foundation for this
future union ? Would it not be well, for any that are wilhng, to sign some
articles of agreement before God calls me hence ? Suppose something
like these : —
VOL. in. E
Ai;e 66
50 Life and Times of Wesley.
1769 "' Wc, whose names are underwritten, being thoroughly convinced of
the necessity of a close union between those whom God is pleased to use
as instruments in this glorious work, in order to preserve this union be-
tween ourselves, are resolved, God being our helper: (i) To devote our-
selves entirely to God; denying ourselves, taking up our cross daily,
steadily aiming at one thing, to save our own souls, and them that hear
us. (2) To preach the old Methodist doctrines, and no other, contained
in the minutes of the conferences. (3) To observe and enforce the whole
Methodist discipline, laid down in the said minutes.' "
Such was Wesley's propounded scheme. The preachers
wisely requested Wesley to extract the* most material part of
the minutes, and to send a copy to each itinerant, to be
seriously considered, — a request with which Wesley complied
during the following year, by the publication of a pamphlet of
sixty pages, entitled, " Minutes of several Conversations be-
tween the Rev. Messrs. John and Charles Wesley and others."
This concluded the business of the conference ; and " at the
conclusion," says Wesley, " all the preachers were melted
down, while they were singing those lines for me, —
' Thou, who so long hast saved me here,
A little longer save ;
Till freed from sin, and freed from fear,
I sink into a grave :
Till glad I lay my body down,
Thy servant's steps attend ;
And O ! my life of mercies crown
With a triumphant end.' " ^
This was a beautiful finish to one of the most important
conferences Wesley ever held. The next day, he again started
on his itinerancy of mercy, and hastened to join in the anni-
versary services of the Countess of Huntingdon's college at
Trevecca. These services really extended from August 18 to
August 24, though Wesley himself was there only on the two
concluding days. The gathering was a glorious one. Fletcher,
the president, was there, with his seraphic soul lighting up an
almost unearthly face ; Daniel Rowlands also, the rector of
Llangeitto and chaplain to the Duke of Leinster ; Howel Harris,
one of the bravest veterans in the group ; the Rev. Walter
Shirley, from Ireland, and others ; making eight clergymen
altogether ; to whom must be added the Countess of Hunt-
' Methodist Magazine, 1799, p. 253.
Anniversary of Ti'evecca College. 5 1
ingdon, the Countess of Buchan, Lady Anne Erskine, and 1769
several of their relatives and friends. There were a number Age66
of Welsh exhorters ; and, of course, the students ; and like-
wise an immense concourse of communicants and spectators.
For seven days, there was preaching twice a day ; the sacra-
ment Was repeatedly administered ; a lovefeast was held ;
baskets of bread and meat were distributed in the courtyard
among the country people ; and the whole season was what
Whitefield called a pentecost.^ Wesley preached twice, gave
an exhortation, and administered the Lord's supper to the
countess's family, and so ended his service in connection with
what he designates " the anniversary of her ladyship's school."
This was his first and last visit.
At this time, Joseph Benson, now in the twenty-first
year of his age, was classical master of Wesley's school at
Kingswood, and had, with Wesley's sanction, entered himself
at St. Edmund's hall, Oxford, where he regularly kept his
terms. But now an effort was made to obtain his services as
head master at Trevecca. Wesley, for more reasons than one,
was loth to lose him. Hence the letters following.
"Cork, May 27, 1769.
" Dear Joseph, — You have now — what you never had before — a clear
providential call to Oxford. If you keep a single eye, and have courage
and steadiness, you may be an instrument of much good. But you will
tread on slippery ground ; and the serious persons you mention may do
you more hurt than many others. When I was at Oxford, I never was
afraid of any but the almost Christians. If you give way to them and
their prudence a hair's breadth, you will be removed from the hope of the
gospel. If you are not moved, if you tread in the same steps which my
brother and I did, you may be the means, under God, of raising another
set of real Bible Christians. How long the world will suffer them is in
God's hand.
" With regard to Kingswood school, I have one string more ; if that
breaks, I shall let it drop. I have borne the burden one-and-twenty
years ; I have done what I could ; now, let some one else do more.
" I am, dear Joseph, your affectionate brother,
"John Wesley."2
Again.
" London, December 26, 1769,
" Dear Joseph, — Every man of sense, who reads the rules of the
* " Life and Times of Countess of Huntingdon," vol. ii., p. 99.
2 Wesley's Works, vol. xii., p. 383.
52 Life and Times of Wesley.
school, may easily conclude that a school so conducted by men of piety
and understanding will exceed any other school or academy in Great
Britain or Ireland. In this sentiment, you can never be altered. And if
it was not so conducted since you were there, why was it not ? You had
power enough. You have all the power which I have. You may do what
you please.
" ' Dime et cBciiJica; muta quadrata rotiaidis; ' and I will second you to
the uttermost.
" Trevecca is much more to than Kingswood is to me. / mixes
with everything. It is 7ny college, my masters, my students. I do not
speak so of this school. It is not mine, but the Lord's. I look for no
more honour than money from it.
"I am glad you defer your journey; and am, dear Joseph, your affec-
tionate brother,
"John Wesley."'
Wesley was evidently sore about Benson leaving him ; but,
a few weeks afterwards, the exchange was made ; and then,
after nine months of faithful service at Trevecca, the young
head master was unceremoniously dismissed, because of his
defending the doctrines of his friend Wesley.
From Trevecca, Wesley made his way to Bristol, which he
reached on August 26; and, from there, set off to Cornwall,
where he employed a week in visiting as many of his societies
as he could in so short a period. On getting back to Bristol,
he inquired into the state of Kingswood school, and writes •
" The grievance now is the number of children. Instead of
thirty, as I desired, we have near fifty ; whereby our masters
are burdened. And it is scarce possible to keep them in
so exact order as we might do a smaller number. However,
> this still comes nearer a Christian school than any I know in
the kingdom."
The next month was spent in the neighbourhood of Bristol,
and was not without adventures. At Bradford, he was sur-
rounded by a noisy rabble ; " and one," says he, " called a
gentleman, had filled his pocket with rotten eggs ; but a
young man smashed them all at once ; and, in an instant, he
was perfume all over, though it was not so sweet as balsam."
At Salisbury, the scene of so many of his sister Patty's
sorrows, Wesley writes : " I was as in a new world. The
congregation was alive, and much more the society. How
' Wesley's Works, vol. xii., p. 384.
" Shepherd of Salisbicjy Piain^ 53
pleasing would it be, to be always with such ! But this is not 17^9
our calling." Wesley had seen dark days here ; but now the Age 66
sun was shining. After the desolation caused by Westley
Hall's disgraceful conduct, the few remaining Methodists took
possession of a shop in Greencroft Street, and then, in 1759,
built themselves a chapel.' Barbara Hunt was one of their
chief members, — a brave young woman, now thirty-three years
old, but who lived long enough to be a Methodist threescore
years and three, and died exclaiming, " O how glad should I
be to clap my glad wings and tower away ! " ^ Another was
David Saunders, the hero of Mrs. Hannah More's " Shepherd
of Salisbury Plain." " His coat," says the fair authoress,
perhaps mixing a little fiction with fact, — " his coat had
been, in a long course of years, so often patched with different
sorts of cloth, that it was now become hard to say which had
been the original colour ; his stockings were covered with
darns of different coloured worsted, but had not a hole in
them ; his shirt, though nearly as coarse as the sails of a ship,
was as white as the drifted snow; his open honest countenance
bore strong marks of health and cheerfulness." His 'good
wife was cleanly, thrifty, and a hard worker ; and a happier
man than the " shepherd of Salisbury plain " did not exist.
David Saunders was a shepherd in more respects than one.
While he tended his sheep, he also, as a faithful classleader,
watched over the souls committed to his care. He died in
peace, in 1796, at the age of eighty.^
Wesley got back to London on October 14, but two days
afterwards set out for Oxfordshire, and spent the week in
preaching at Henley, Wallingford, Oxford, Witney, Broad-
marston, and Wycombe. The last week in October he em-
ployed at Towcester, Northampton, Weedon, Bedford, and
other intervening towns, preaching, during his five days' tour,
not fewer than seventeen times in widely distant places.
At the beginning of November he went to Norfolk ; at
the end, he visited his old friend Perronet, at Shoreham, and
preached twice in his parish church. Even here, in the vicar's
kitchen, there was Methodist preaching every Friday night,
and also a Methodist society, embracing Mr. Kingswood, Mr.
' Methodist Magazine, 1836, p. 52. - Ibid. 1815, p. 46.
3 " Methodism in Frome," h^' Tuck, p. 42.
54 Life and Times of Wesley. '
Sharp, old Mrs. Lightfoot and her servant maid, poor dame
Cacket, and bold, masculine minded Miss D. Perronet at the
head of them.i
Except short tours to Kent and Sussex, the remainder of
the year was employed in London, where he received letters
from Boardman and Pilmoor in America, and which he read
to the London society. He was importuned to visit America
himself ; and, though such a visit was utterly impracticable,
yet he was far from hasty in declining it. Hence the follow-
ing, addressed to his friend, the Rev. Walter Sellon.
" London, December 30, 1 769.
"My dear Brother,— It is not yet determined whether I should go
to America or not. I have been importuned some time ; but nil satfirtni
video. I must have a clear call before I am at liberty to leave Europe.
" You should heat your milk, but never let it boil ; boiling robs it of
the most nutritious particles. Do not make too much haste in dealing
with Elisha Coles ; I am afraid the treatise will be too short. And pray
add a word to that liv'ely coxcomb, Mr. Toplady, not only with regard to
Zanchius, but his slander on the Church of England. You would do
well to give a reading to both his tracts. He does certainly believe
himself to be the greatest genius in England. Pray take care, or natis sit
pro siiis virtiitibiis.
" I am, your affectionate brother,
" John Wesley." ^
Mr. Toplady's two tracts, referred to in this epistle, were
his (i) " Church of England Vindicated from the Charge of
Arminianism, in a Letter to the Rev. Dr. Nowell; occasioned
by some passages in that gentleman's answer to the Author
of ' Pietas Oxoniensis,'" 8vo, 136 pages: and (2) "The
Doctrine of Absolute Predestination Stated and Asserted.
Translated, in great measure, from the Latin of Jerom
Zanchius, with some Account of his Life prefixed," 8vo,
134 pages. Both these pamphlets were published in 1769.
All this, and a great deal more, really arose out of the
expulsion of the Oxford students in 1768. Sir Richard Hill,
in defending them, had warmly defended the Calvinistic
doctrine of predestination. Dr. Nowell, in his Answer, had
clearly shown, that this was not the doctrine of the Church of
^ Miss Perronet's manuscript letters ; and Methodist Magazine, 1811,
p. 234.
" Wesley's Works, vol. xiii., p. 42 ; and manuscript letter.
Calvinism. 55
England; and now impetuous Augustus Toplady hastened 1769
to the rescue, and administered two allopathic doses of Age66
Calvinism's most drastic tincture, to cure the Church of
Arminian disease and fever. Toplady's style is trenchant ;
his doctrines are as near an approach to the doctrine of fate,
as held by Plato, Seneca, and other heathen writers, as it is
possible to conceive. A more impious piece, in the garb of
piety, was never published than his Zanchius ; while his
" Church of England Vindicated " is rank with the most
docfmatic and violent abuse of Dr. Nowell and the Arminian
clergy. It would be easy, but not pleasant, to give extracts ;
and we can hardly recommend the reader to peruse the pam-
phlets for himself. Augustus Toplady, a stripling twenty-nine
years of age, is a pope infallible ; and all who hold opinions
different to his are reprobate knaves, or fools.
Wesley was sick of controversial writing ; and, besides, he
had no time for it. Walter Sellon had leisure at his com-
mand, and had already this year published his able treatise,
entitled, " The Doctrine of General Redemption considered,"
i2mo, 178 pages. He was also now engaged in refuting a
book hardly less horrible than the Zanchius of Augustus
Toplady, namely, " A Practical Discourse of God's Sove-
reignty," i2mo, 347 pages, by Elisha Coles, a clerk to the
East India Company, who died in 1688. Sellon's book was
soon issued, with the title, " A Defence of God's Sovereignty,
against the impious and horrible Aspersions cast upon it by
Elisha Coles, in his practical treatise on that subject." In
his preface, he tells his readers, he " did intend to have ex-
posed the errors and blasphemy " of Toplady's Zanchius, but .
when he "found it would enlarge his work too much, and
especially when he understood that Toplady had vilely
slandered the Church of England," he chose " to make it the
subject of another book, which the reader might expect
unless it should be done by some abler hand."^
^ Sellon's book was not published till 1770, and seems to have been
revised by Wesley, who also approved of his dealing with Toplady in a
separate pamphlet. Hence the following, addressed to Sellon.
" Lewisham, February 21, 1770.
"My dear Brother, — Do not make too much haste. Give every-
hing the last touch. It will be enough, if the papers meet me at Man-
56 Life and Times of Wesley.
1769 Controversial war was now begun in earnest, and a severer
Age 66 battle was never fought. Sir Richard Hill, Augustus Top-
lady, and Walter Sellon were fairly in the lists, and others
soon after followed.
In the midst of all this, Wesley was savagely attacked in
two letters, published in the Gospel Magazine for 1769,
entitled, " Observations on Mr. J. Wesley's view of ' The
Scripture Doctrines of Predestination, Election, and Repro-
bation."* He is accused of "inexcusable vanity"; of " im-
pertinent quibbling"; of "Jesuitical sophistry"; of holding
"a scheme unscriptural and dangerous, absurd and impious";
and of " finespun reasoning worse than nothing." The
author complacently tells his readers, in conclusion, that,
though he had felt himself "very resentful," yet being
"called to imitate the lovely pattern of the lowly Jesus, he
had answered Wesley not with asperity, but with the meek-
ness of wisdom."
Attgicks upon Wesley were made from other quarters. It
was a busy year with young Toplady ; for, besides the books
already noticed, he published a sixpenny pamphlet, with the
title, " Many made Righteous by the Obedience of One. Two
Sermons on Romans v. 19, preached at Bideford, in 1743, by
the late Rev. James Hervey, with a Preface by Augustus
Toplady." Some one else issued another, entitled, " The
Jesuit Detected," in which the zealous advocate of Mr.
Hervey arrays Wesley in the garb of the Babylonian woman,
and then abuses him for looking so like her. Booth Brath-
waite, unknown to fame, published another sixpennyworth,
. called " Methodism a Popish Idol ; or, the Danger and
Harmony of Enthusiasm and Separation." Poor Booth, a
bigot to church establishments, raves against sectaries with
abundant zeal, little knowledge, and less charity. And to
all these must be added, " The Pretences of Enthusiasts,
considered and confuted : A Sermon preached before the
university of Oxford, at St. Mary's, on Sunday, June 26,
Chester, before the end of March. I believe it will be the best way to
bestow a distinct pamphlet on that exquisite coxcomb. Surely wisdom
will die with him ! I believe we can easily get his other tract, which it
would be well to sift to the very foundation, in order to stop the mouth of
that vain boaster. 1 am, etc., John Wesley."— (Manuscript letter.)
Publications in 1769. 57
1768. By William Hawkins, M.A., Prebendary of Wells, 1769
late Poetry Professor, and Fellow of Pembroke College, Acre 66
in Oxford. Published by desire." 8vo, 27 pages.
Wesley's own publications in 1769 were not many.
1. "An Extract of the Rev. Mr. John Wesley's Journal,
from October 20, 1762, to May 25, 1765." i2mo, 124 pages.
2. " An Extract from the Journal of Elizabeth Harper."
i2mo, 47 pages.
3. "An Extract of Letters on Religious Subjects, "by Mrs.
Lefevre." i2mo, 106 pages.
4. " The Witness of the Spirit. A Sermon on Romans
viii. 16." Dublin: i2mo, 16 pages. This important sermon
was written at Newry, in 1767. Wesley declares that his
sentiments on the witness of the Spirit were the same as
they had been from the beginning. " The testimony of the
Spirit," says he, " is an inward impression on the soul of
believers, whereby the Spirit of God directly testifies to their
spirit, that they are the children of God." Having established
his doctrine, and answered the objections to it, he concludes
with two pungent inferences : " i. Let none ever presume to
rest in any supposed testimony of the Spirit, which is separate
from the fruit of it. 2. Let none rest in any supposed fruit
of the Spirit without the witness."
5. " Advices with respect to Health. Extracted from a
late Author." i2mo, 218 pages. The late author was Dr.
Tissot ; the book itself shows Wesley's intense anxiety to be
of use to the bodies as well as souls of his fellow creatures.
He strongly commends Tissot's descriptions of diseases, the
fewness and cheapness of his medicines, and his regimen ; but
protests against his fondness for bleeding, and for glysters ;
against his ointment for the itch, and his vehement recom-
mendation of Peruvian bark.
1^70
Age 67
1770.
WESLEY began the year 1770 with a covenant service
in London, at which eighteen hundred Methodists
were present, — a sight worth seeing.
In his leisure moments, he employed himself in reading ;
and, as usual, makes racy remarks on men and books.
Having finished Dr. Burnet's "Theory of the Earth," he
writes : " He is doubtless one of the firstrate writers, both as
to sense and style ; his language is remarkably clear, un-
affected, nervous, and elegant ; and none can deny, that his
theory is ingenious, and consistent with itself." He read
Rousseau upon education, and says : " But how was I dis-
appointed ! Sure a more consummate coxcomb never saw
the sun! How amazingly full of himself! Whatever he
speaks, he pronounces as an oracle. But many of his oracles
are as palpably false as that ' young children never love old
people.' But I object to his temper more than to his judg-
ment : he is a mere misanthrope, a cynic all over. So in-
deed is his brother infidel, Voltaire ; and well-nigh as great a
coxcomb. But he hides both his doggedness and vanity a
little better ; whereas, here it stares us in the face continually.
As to his book, it is whimsical to the last degree ; grounded
neither upon reason nor experience. The advices, which are
good, are trite and common, only disguised under new ex-
pressions ; and those which are new, which are really his own,
are lighter than vanity itself Such discoveries I always ex-
pect from those who are too wise to believe their Bibles."
Baron Emanuel Swedenborg, after rendering great service to
science, and thereby winning the esteem of Charles XH., and
receiving the honour of being enrolled among the members
of the academies of Upsal, Stockholm, and Petersburgh,
came to London in 1743, attended the Moravian chapel
in Fetter Lane, went mad,^ and began to write and publish
the visionary books, containing the creed of the Sweden-
^ Methodist Magazine, 1781, p. 46.
Christian Perfection. 59
borgians. Wesley writes : " I sat down to read and seriously 1770
consider some of the writings of Baron Swedenborg. I began a^67
with huge prejudice in his favour, knowing him to be a pious
man, one of a strong understanding, of much learning, and
one who thoroughly believed himself. But I could not hold
out long. Any one of his visions puts his real character out
of doubt. He is one of the most ingenious, lively, entertain-
ing madmen, that ever set pen to paper. But his waking
dreams are so wild, so far remote both from Scripture and
common sense, that one might as easily swallow the stories of
* Tom Thumb,' or ' Jack the Giant Killer.' " The baron died
two years after this, and was buried in the Swedish church in
Wellclose Square, London.
In the month of February, Wesley, for the last time, took
part in a religious service, and administered the sacrament, in
the mansion of the Countess of Huntingdon^ in Portland Row.
Thomas Maxfield was present, and though a few years before
he had been one of the strongest sticklers in favour of the
wild doctrines propounded by George Bell and other sancti-
fied ones in London, he now, in Wesley's own presence, spoke
strongly against his doctrine of Christian perfection.' This
might be gratifying to her ladyship and her Calvinistic
friends ; but it would have been in better taste for Maxfield,
at least, to have maintained, on such a subject, a respectful
silence. No doubt, foolish ideas had been circulated ; but
Wesley can hardly be held accountable for these. His own
doctrines on the subject were based upon Scripture, and these
he was ready to defend, and resolved to propagate. It is
true, that his anticipations respecting the great work, which
was professedly wrought in London and elsewhere, had not
been realised. Even Miss Bosanquet had lost the blessing of
Christian perfection ; ^ and Wesley, in a letter dated March
15, 1770, confesses that, of those who professed to obtain it,
hardly one in thirty retained it. " Many hundreds in Lon-
don," says he, " were made partakers of it, within sixteen or
eighteen months ; but I doubt whether twenty of them are
now as holy and as happy as they were."^ This was a humili-
^ "Life and Times of Countess of Huntingdon," vol. i., p. 387.
^ Wesley's Works, vol. xii.,p. 375. ^ Ibid. p. 330.
6o Life and Times of Wesley.
1770 ating fact, and gave to Wesley's opponents a great advan-
A.^7 tage ; but, in itself, it was no disproof of Wesley's doctrine ;
and can scarcely be considered a satisfactory excuse for
Thomas Maxfield, of all men living, attacking his friend in
the house of his Calvinistic foes.
' Wesley's friend Whitefield was in America, preaching with
as much zest as ever ; and, just at this juncture, Wesley ad-
dressed what proved to be his last letter to his old and always
faithful coadjutor ; but the letter contains not a single
syllable respecting the slight which had been cast upon him
by a man whom gratitude ought to have taught better
manners.
" Lewisham, Febriiary 21, 1770.
"My dear Brother,— Mr. Keen informed me some time since of
your safe arrival in Carolina ; of which, indeed, I could not doubt for a
moment, notwithstanding the idle report of your being cast away, which
was so current in London. I trust our Lord has more work for you to do
in Europe, as well as in America. And who knows but before your return,
to England, I may pay another visit to the new world ? I have been
strongly solicited by several of our friends in New York and Philadelphia.
They urge many reasons, some of which appear to be of considerable
weight ; and my age is no objection at all ; for I bless God my health is
not barely as good, but abundantly better in several respects, than when
I was five-and-twenty. But there are so many reasons on the other side,
that, as yet, I can determine nothing ; so I must wait for further light.
Here I am: let the Lord do with me as seemeth Him good. For the
present, I must beg of you to supply my lack of service, by encouraging our
preachers, as you judge best (who are as yet comparatively young and inex-
perienced); by giving them such advices as you think proper ; and, above
all, by exhorting them, not only to love one another, but, if it be possible,
as much as lies in them, to live peaceably with all men.
" Some time ago, since you went hence, I heard a circumstance, which
gave me a good deal of concern ; namely, that the college or academy in
Georgia had swallowed up the orphan house. Shall I give my judgment
without being asked ? Methinks, friendship requires I should. Are there
not then two points which come in view ? a point of mercy, and a point
of justice ? With respect to the former, may it not be inquired. Can any-
thing on earth be a greater charity than to bring up orphans ? What is
a college or an academy compared to this .'' unless you could have such
a college as perhaps is not upon earth. I know the value of learning,
and am more in danger of prizing it too much than too little ; but, still, I
cannot place the giving it to five hundred students on a level with saving
the bodies, if not the souls too, of five hundred orphans. But let us pass
from the point of mercy to that of justice. You had land given, and col-
lected money, for an orphan house. Are you at liberty to apply this to
Age 67
Whitejield's College in Georgia. 6i
any other purpose? at least, while there are any orphans in Georgia left ? 1770
I just touch upon this, though it is an important point, and leave it to your
own consideration, whether part of it, at least, might not properly be
applied to carry on the original design? In speaking thus freely, on so
tender a subject, I have given you a fresh proof of the sincerity with
which I am your ever affectionate friend and brother,
"John Wesley."'
The college business above mentioned was simply this.
Six years before, Whitefield had informed the council of
Georgia, that he had already expended i^ 12,000 upon his
Orphan House ; that he was now anxious to attach to it a
college, to which the respectable inhabitants of Georgia, Vir-
ginia, and the West Indies might send their sons to be
educated ; that, in order to accomplish his purpose, he was
prepared to lay out a considerable sum of money " in pur-
cJiasing a large mimbcr of negroes " for the cultivation of the
lands, and for the " future support of a president, professors,
and tutors ;" and that he now asked the council to grant him,
in trust, for the purposes aforesaid, two thousand acres of
land, on the north fork of Turtle River. The council yielded
his request at once, and with the greatest pleasure. White-
field then memorialised the king to grant a charter for the
founding of the college, stating that, if this were done, he was
"ready to give up his present trust, and make a free gift of all
lands, negroes, goods, and chattels, which he now possessed
in Georgia, for the support of the proposed institution, to be
called by the name of Bethesda college, in Georgia." A long
official correspondence followed. The government were not
unwilling to grant a charter, but they insisted that the presi-
dent of the college should be a minister of the Church of
England, and that there should be a daily use of the Church
liturgy. These were conditions which Whitefield respectfully
declined ; and hence the charter asked for was refused. The
result was, Whitefield added to his Georgian orphan house
a public academy, by the erection of two additional wings,
one hundred and fifty feet each in length ; and, a month
before Wesley wrote his letter, opened the new building, by
preaching before his excellency the governor, and before the
* Wesley's Works, vol. xii., p. 148.
62 Life and Tiines of Wesley.
1770 Georgian council and assembly, from, "The hands of Zerub-
Age 67 babel have laid the foundations of this house. His hands shall
also finish it ; and thou shalt know that the Lord of hosts
hath sent me unto you ; for who hath despised the day of
small things?" Thus Whitefield left behind him, in America,
a complex orphanage and college, for the support of which
he had obtained grants of land to the extent of 3800 acres,
and had bought seventy-five male and female negroes for the
purpose of cultivating his extensive farm, and making it
productive.^
We have already seen that Wesley was not only urged, but
was more than willing, to visit his newly instituted societies
in America. Pilmoor was working hard at New York, and
Boardman at Philadelphia ; a number of negroes had been
converted; the work was growing; and the young evangelists
— Boardman of seven, and Pilmoor of five years' standing
— wished for advice and help.^ Wesley had nearly arrived at
the age of threescore years and ten ; but, if his way had
opened, he would have bounded off across the Atlantic with
as little anxiety as he was accustomed to trot to the hospi-
table Perronet home at Shoreham. The obstacles however
were insurmountable. There was no one, during his absence,
to take his place as superintendent general of the societies
in England, Scotland, Wales, and Ireland ; and to this must
be added the strong objections of the people to let him go.
" If I go to America," said he, " I must do a thing which I
hate as bad as I hate the devil." " What is that .'* " asked his
friend. " I must keep a secret" he answered ; meaning, that
he must conceal his purpose, otherwise his societies would in-
terfere, and effectually prevent his going.^
On the 5th of March, Wesley set out on his journey to the
north, which occupied the next five months. Coming to
Newbury, he writes : " I had been much importuned to
preach here. But where .'* The Dissenters would not permit
me to preach in • their meetinghouse. Some were then
desirous to hire the old playhouse ; but the good mayor
would not suffer it to be so profaned ! So I made use of a
* Whitefield's Works, vol. iii. ^ Methodist Magazine, 1784, p. 224.
2 Whitehead's Life of Wesley, vol. ii., p. 345.
Riding on Horsebaclk. 63
workshop, — a large, commodious place. But it would, by no 1770
means, contain the congregation. All that could hear behaved a~67
well"
From Newbury, Wesley proceeded to Bristol, Gloucester,
Birmingham, and Wednesbury. He then made his way,
through Stafifordshire and Cheshire, to Manchester, where he
arrived at the end of March, and made the following charac-
teristic entry in his journal : " In this journey, as well as in
many others, I observed a mistake that almost universally
prevails. Near thirty years ago, I was thinking, ' How is it
that no horse ever stumbles while I am reading V (History,
poetry, and philosophy, I commonly read on horseback,
having other employment at other times.) No account can
possibly be given but this : because, then I throw the reins on
his neck. I then set myself to observe ; and I aver, that, in
riding above a hundred thousand miles, I scarce ever remem-
ber any horse (except two that would fall head over heels any
way), to fall, or make a considerable stumble, while I rode
with a slack rein. To fancy, therefore, that a tight rein
prevents stumbling is a capital blunder.^ I have repeated the
trial more frequently than most men in the kingdom can do.
A slack rein will prevent stumbling if anything will. But in
some horses nothing can."
From Manchester, Wesley proceeded to Liverpool, White-
haven, and Carlisle, preaching there, and at intermediate
places. He writes : " At Carlisle, it w^as the day of small
things ; the society consisting but of fifteen members."
Methodism had been founded in this border city by Robert
Bell, an exciseman ; and its place of worship was a shed for
sheltering carts. At almost every meeting the mob attended ;
stones and brickbats were often thrown, and the Methodists
hissed at and otherwise abused.^
Leaving Carlisle, Wesley made his way to Edinburgh,
which he reached on April 20, and says : " I endeavoured to
confirm those whom many had strove to turn out of the way.
What pity is it, that the children of God should so zealously
do the devil's work ! How is it, that they are still ignorant
of Satan's devices.-' Lord, what is man V "The congrega-
* Thomas Dixon's manuscript journal.
64 Life and Times of Wesley.
T-11'^ tions were nearly as usual; but the society which, when I
Age 67 was here before, consisted of above one hundred and sixty
members, was now shrunk to about fifty. Such is the fruit
of a single preacher's staying a whole year in one place,
together with the labours of good Mr. Townshend !"
It was at this time that Wesley had his first interview with
Lady Glenorchy.^ She writes : "The Rev. Dr. Webster^ and
Mr. Wesley met at my house, and agreed on all doctrines on
which they spoke, except those of God's decrees, predestina-
tion, and the saints' perseverance. I must, according to the
light I now have, agree with Dr. Webster. Nevertheless, I
hope Mr. Wesley is a child of God. He has been an instru-
ment of saving souls ; as such, I honour him, and will
countenance his preachers. I have heard him preach thrice ;
and should have been better pleased had he preached more
of Christ, and less of himself." ^
Lady Glenorchy had recently opened St. Mary's chapel, in
which service was performed by presbyterians, episcopalians,
and Methodists ; but her ladyship now wished to have a
schoolmaster and a minister of her own ; and, notwithstanding
her disparaging remarks on Wesley, she employed him to
obtain them for her. A few weeks later she wrote to him as
follows.
" Edinburgh, May 29, 1770.
" Reverend Sir, — When I consider how much you have to do, and
how very precious your time is, I feel unwilhng to give you the trouble of
reading a letter from me ; yet I know not how to delay returning you my
best thanks for the pains you have taken to procure me a Christian
innkeeper and schoolmaster. And, though you have not as yet been
successful, I hope you may find some before you reach London, who are
wiUing to leave their native country and friends for the sake of promoting
the interest of Christ's kingdom. If Mr. Eggleston's objections relate
only to temporal things, perhaps it may be in my power to remove them.
I am exceedingly obliged to you, dear and honoured sir, for your good
advice ; it is agreeable to that small glimmering of light the Lord has
been pleased to give me for five years past. Let me entreat you to
^ " Life of Lady Glenorchy," p. 155.
2 One of the ministers of the Tolbooth church, — a man of great
abilities and of polished manners, but an avowed Calvinist of the highest
order. — (Lady Glenorchy's Life, p. 132.)
^ '• Life of Lady Glenorchy," p. 156.
Wesley and Lady GlcnorcJiy. 65
remember me at the throne of grace. I am, reverend sir, with esteem 1770
and respect, your obhged servant, — '
"WILLIELMA GLENORCHY."! Age 67
Within a week after this, Wesley obtained her ladyship a
schoolmaster ; and, at the beginning of the year following,
sent her a minister, the Rev. Richard De Courcy, who had
been a Methodist in Ireland,^ had been educated at Trinity
college, Dublin, had obtained deacon's orders, and had
officiated as curate to Walter Shirley.^ Lady Glenorcliy
writes : " Mr. De Courcy is quite the person Mr. Wesley
represented him, — of a sweet disposition, and wishes only to
preach Christ to poor sinners wherever he finds an open
door."* This was in February, 1771, and yet, within six
months afterwards, on June 28, her ladyship writes again :
" Before I left Edinburgh, I dismissed Mr. Wesley's preachers
from my chapel ; first, because they deny the doctrines of
imputed righteousness, election, and the saints' perseverance ;
secondly, because I found none of our gospel ministers would
preach in the chapel, if they continued to have the use of the
pulpit ; thirdly, because I found my own soul had been hurt
by hearing them, and I judged that others might be hurt by
them also." ^
Thus, after Wesley had served her ladyship to the utmost
of his power, he and his preachers were ignominiously ex-
pelled from the sacred precincts of St. Mary's, and her chapel
was left in the sole possession of Mr. De Courcy and his Cal-
vinistic friends. It is right to add that, notwithstanding her
Calvinism, Lady Glenorchy maintained, to the end of life, a
warm friendship with her Methodist friend. Lady Maxwell,
whom, at her death, she appointed her sole executrix, and
the principal manager of her chapels, both in England and
across the border.^
To return to Wesley. From Edinburgh, he went to Perth,
Dunkeld, and Inverness, at which last mentioned place
Benjamin and William Chappel had been three months
^ Methodist Magazine, 1784, p. 279.
2 " Life of Lady Glenorchy," pp. 163, 226.
s " Life and Times of Lady Huntingdon," vol. i., p. 157.
^ Lady Glenorchy's Life, p. 223. * Ibid. p. 239.
« Methodist Magazine, 18 16, p. 730.
VOL. III. F
66 Life and Times of JVesky.
1770 waiting for a vessel to return to London, and had employed
AgTe; the time in meeting the people every night to sing and pray
together." Benjamin Chappel, who thus begun Methodism
in Inverness, was a wheelwright, and, in after years, had the
honour of being the first Methodist in Prince Edward's
Island.^
At Aberdeen, as at Inverness and Nairn, Wesley preached
in the kirk. At Arbroath, the society, though of but nine
months' standing, was the largest in Scotland, with the
exception of that at Aberdeen. At Dunbar he preached in
the new chapel, "the cheerfulest in the kingdom"; and, on
May 21, reached Newcastle on Tyne; but here we pause to
insert a letter of considerable interest.
Within the last two years, Wesley had met at Bristol with
a clergyman, who was one of the king of Sweden's chaplains,
but who had recently spent several years in Pennsylvania.
This gentleman, Dr. Wrangel, had strongly requested that
Wesley would send preachers to America, nearly twelve
months before Boardman and Pilmoor were appointed; and,
further, to show his friendly feeling towards Methodism he
had preached in the Bristol chapel to a crowd of Methodists,
and "gave," says Wesley, "general satisfaction by the sim-
plicity and life which accompanied his sound doctrine." Dr.
Wrangel had now returned to Sweden, and wrote the following
to Wesley.
" Stockholm, May 5, 1770.
" Dear and much beloved Brother in Christ Jesus,— I hope my
heart will ever be impressed with the warmest gratitude for the comfort I
enjoyed in your society. Though absent in body, I have often been amongst
you. When I left England, I arrived first at Gothenburg, and lodged
at the right reverend bishop, Dr, Lamberg's, who was fellow chaplain
with me at court, I found him to be a great friend of yours. He had
heard you preach while on his travels in England. I sent him your books,
and he was well pleased with what he read, and desired me to remember
him to you.
" I have now been upwards of a year in Stockholm, and have officiated
as chaplain to the king, and at the same time preached in most of the
churches here, and I must say, with uncommon success. Whenever I
have preached the churches have been crowded. The king, on his death-
bed, made me a privy councillor. When I spoke to him of the way of
* Methodist Magazine, 185 1, p. 837.
Methodism in S^ueden. 6j
salvation, he received the word with gladness, and departed in the Lord, i77fJ
to the great edification and comfort of the whole family. His queen also, Arr~67
who is of English descent, is eminent in piety. This, I hope, will be at- **
tended 'with good consequences in favour of religion.
" Last parliament session several clergymen, and amongst them four
bishops, agreed to my proposals concerning a society for propagating
practical religion. We intend, as soon as the plan is rightly fixed, to
enter into correspondence with several parts of the world ; and we expect
the honour of your correspondence also.
" Providence is about to settle me in a station of great importance. I
am about to be named the almoner of his majesty. This office is of im-
portance to religion in general. Finally, my dear brother, let me be in-
cluded in all your prayers, and let me hear from you. I am, with the
greatest sincerity of affection, dear and reverend brother, your most
humble and affectionate brother and servant,
" C. M. Wrangel." 1
Further correspondence followed, from which we learn that
Dr. Wrangel himself, like Wesley, had been an open air
preacher ; but was now, not only the king of Sweden's
almoner, but "president of the consistory at court, and
chaplain to all the royal orders." He writes to Wesley in
177 1 : " Pray, dear sir, desire your society to intercede for me.
I send you enclosed the letter of admission to our society. The
rules, not yet being printed in English, we send in German.
I sincerely thank you for the kind present of your sermons
and books. I presented a copy of your sermon to
the society, which was very acceptable. The society will
have the life of Mr. Whitefield inserted in their Pastoral
Collections, or account of the work of God abroad. 1 beg of
you, sir, to remember me kindly to all your friends, not for-
getting dear Kingswood. I have been greatly blessed in my
labour amongst the great, and shall soon give a particular
account of it." ^
Thus, as England had its Wesleys, America its Whitefield,
and Wales its Howel Harris, Sweden also had its great re-
former,— Dr. Wrangel, once a field preacher, but now a
founder of a quasi missionary society, and, as a faithful
minister of Christ, bearing his testimony before kings and
princes. Through Dr. Wrangel's friendship with Wesley,
Methodism had already, fifty-six years before its appointment
' Methodist Magazine, 1784, p. 330. - Ibid. 1784, p. 614-
68 Life mid Times of Wesley.
^77° of the Rev. Joseph Rayner Stephens to Stockholm, indirectly
Age 67 extended its influences to the Swedish capital, and had begun
that wondrous work, which, fostered by the Rev. Dr. Scott,
has issued in some of the most remarkable results recorded in
mission history.
Wesley left Newcastle for London on the nth of June,
and, on his journey, preached for the most part thrice a day.
At Whitby, one of his itinerants, of six years' standing,
" had set up for himself; his reasons for leaving the Method-
ists being — (i) that they went to church; (2) that they
held perfection." It is a remarkable fact, that sixty-five of
the Whitby Methodists professed to be entirely sanctified.
From Whitby, Wesley proceeded along the east coast to
Robinhood's Bay, Scarborough, Bridlington, and Hull.
From Hull, he made his way to Beverley, York, Tadcaster,
Pateley, Otley, Yeadon, Heptonstall, Colne, Haworth, and
Keighley. The Keighley, or Haworth, circuit, at this period,
extended from Otley to Whitehaven, a distance of one hundred
and twenty miles.^ Yeadon has just been mentioned. Here
James Rhodes began to hold Methodist prayer-meetings as
early as 1747; and here his brother Joseph preached the first
Methodist sermon in Yeadon, in the house of Judith Jackson.
Here Thomas Mitchell, one of Wesley's bravest itinerants, was
trained ; and here William Darney, while preaching, was
attacked by a mob, led on by Reynolds, curate of Guiseley,
had eggs thrown at his face, was dragged out of doors, and
then stamped upon. Here Jonathan Maskew, by the same
godless gang, had his clothes torn off his back, and, in a state
of nakedness, was trailed over the rough stone pavement, till
he was a mass of bruises. The bush burned, but it was not
consumed. In 1766, the first chapel was erected ; and now,
in 1770, it had to be enlarged.
At the beginning of July, Wesley spent about a week at
Leeds, and in the surrounding towns and villages. He visited
the orphanage of Miss Bosanquet, who had removed to Cross
Hall, Morley. Her friend Sarah Crosby, in a letter dated
July 13, 1770, remarks : "Mr. Wesley left Leeds yesterday.
1 never heard him preach better, if so well. In every sermon
' Methodist Magazi7ie, 18 14, p. 166.
Thomas Cook, of LoiighborotLgh. 69
he set forth * Christian perfection' in the most beautiful light. ^77°
Mr. Rankin, who travels with him, is a blessed man, and Age 67
seems to fear no one's face. I believe there has not been
such a time at Leeds for many years." ^
From Leeds, Wesley proceeded to Doncaster, Epworth,
Horncastle, Louth, and other places ; and then, turning round,
came back to Doncaster, and, from there, went to Rotherham,
Sheffield, Derby, and Nottingham, preaching, not only there,
but in many of the intervening villages and towns. He
writes : " I preached at Bingham, and really admired the
exquisite stupidity of the people. They gaped and stared,
while I was speaking of death and judgment, as if they had
never heard of such things before. And they were not helped
by two surly, ill mannered clergymen, who seemed to be just
as wise as themselves."
In Loughborough market place, he preached to a congre-
gation of some thousands, all of them still as night. This
was his first sermon here ; but, four years previous to this,
some of his preachers had visited the town, and, among others,
converted by their ministry, was Thomas Cook, who in hu-
mility, penitence, and self denial, was, even among the first
Methodists, almost without an equal. For three months to-
gether, he would live on barley bread and water, often fasting,
from even nourishment like that, for whole days together, and
praying the whole night through. He invariably wore clothing
of the coarsest material, and when urged to use an overcoat
answered : " When you can assure me, that there is not a poor
man destitute of one coat, I may then perhaps wear tivo!'
For ten years, he prayed for all with whom he happened to
converse ; and as he lived, so he died, — humble, holy, loving,
and devout, — saying in answer to a question, and with his
characteristic self abasement, '' Oh no ! no funeral sermon for
ine!"^
On Thursday, August 2, after a five months' absence,
Wesley got back to London ; and, on August 7, met his con-
ference ; in reference to which, the following unpublished
letter, addressed to Mr. IMerry weather, at Yarm, is not
without interest.
^ Manuscript. ^ Methodist Magazine, 1807, p. 242.
70 Life and Times of Wesley.
1770 "My dear Brother, — I have the credit of stationing the preachers ;
-~~ but many of them go where they will go, for all me. For instance, I have
^'^ marked down James Oddie and John Nelson for Yarm circuit the ensuing
year ; yet, I am not certain that either of them will come. They can
give twenty reasons for going elsewhere. Mr. Murlin says, he must be in
London. 'Tis certain he has a mind to be there ; therefore, so it must
be ; for you know a man of fortune is master of his own motions.
" I am your affectionate brother,
"John Wesley."
The difficulties of conference, in stationing preachers, are
not novel.
There were now fifty Methodist circuits, one of which was
America ! There were a hundred and twenty itinerant
preachers, and 29,406 members of society. Nearly ;^2,ooo
had been subscribed, during the year, towards defraying the
chapel debts ; and yet, in consequence of new erections, the
aggregate debt was about the same. His chapels were be-
coming Wesley's greatest burdens.^ It was resolved, that,
during the coming year, no new chapel should be built, nor
any old one altered, unless the entire expenditure were raised ;
and a proposal was made to vest all the chapels in a general
trust, consisting of persons chosen from among the Method-
ists throughout the kingdom. This would have been a dis-
astrous mistake. Fortunately it was not adopted,
Kingswood school, as usual, was a trouble. It had been
opened two-and-twenty years, and had had, during that period,
eight classical masters, five of whom had obtained episcopal
ordination, and now a sixth, Joseph Benson, had not only
entered himself a graduate at Oxford, but had exchanged
Kingswood for Trevecca. No wonder that Wesley, at the
conference of 1 770, asked, " How can we secure our
masters.''" The answer was, "Ask each, before he is. re-
ceived, Do you design to stay here t have you any thoughts
^ The following hitherto unpublished letter was addressed to Matthew
Lowes, and refers both to circuit, and connexional chapel, debts.
"London, March 2, 1770.
"Dear Matthew, — The way you propose for clearing the circuit is, I
think, the very best which can be devised. Only let your fellow labourers
second _y(?z^ heartily, and the thing will be done.
" Four or five circuits exerted themselves nobly. Had all the rest done
the same our burden would have been quite removed. Well, we will
fight till we die, " I am, etc., J. Wesley."
Doctrinal JMinicies. 71
of being ordained ? have you any design to preach ? " It is 1770
a fact worth noting, that, during the remainder of Wesley's a^67
hfetime, there was only one more classical master who
became an ordained clergyman, and that was Mr. Benson's
immediate successor, Isaac Twicross. ^
Wesley found, that some of his preachers were still en-
gaged in trade ; and, hence, it was now agreed, that those
who would not relinquish trading in cloth, hardware, pills,
drops, and balsams, should be excluded from the brother-
hood ; but that, if any of them, like Thomas Hanby, John
Oliver, and James Oddie, had a share in ships, there would
be no objection to that.^
The conference of 1770, however, will always be memor-
able chiefly, if not entirely, for its doctrinal minutes.
From the first, Whitefield, Howel Harris, and their friends,
had been Calvinists ; and so were many of the evangelical
clergy, patronised by the Countess of Huntingdon, as
Romaine, Newton, Venn, Berridge, Shirley, and others. At
an early period of their history, the two Wesleys agreed,
with the Methodist Calvinistic leaders, to avoid preaching
on Calvinistic topics to the utmost extent possible. Charles
Wesley afterwards endorsed the document with the words
" Vain Agreement." So indeed it was : in fact it could hardly
be otherwise. Wesley, more than once, tried to meet his
friends at a sort of halfway house ; but the attempt was
dangerous, it exposed Wesley to suspicion, and it issued in
a failure. We have already seen that, in 1743, Wesley, for
the purpose of terminating their disputes, made concessions
to Whitefield, respecting unconditional election, irresistible
grace, and final perseverance, which it was impossible to
defend. Accordingly, at the conference held a few months
afterwards, he honestly confessed, that he had " unawares
^ Myles's History.
2 This had become a matter of grave importance. IMatthew Lowes,
one of Wesley's most useful itinerants, states, in his unpublished Auto-
biography, that though the trading cf the preachers, in cloth, groceries,
hardware, etc., was of considerable benefit to themselves and their
families, it was strongly objected to by the people: (i) because it inter-
fered with the businesses of Methodists in the places which the preachers
visited ; and (2) because it was deemed inconsistent for a minister of the
word of God to be engaged in any kind of trade whatever. Lowes' trad-
ing was chiefly confined to the sale of a valuable balsam, of which he
72 Life and Times of Wesley.
leaned too much towards Calvinism ;"^ and proceeded to pro-
pound doctrines, which, in substance, were the same as those
he now embodied in the theses of 1770. Twenty-six years
had elapsed since then ; but there was a striking resemblance
between the two periods ; and, substantially, the same cause
for outspokenness. To say nothing more concerning White-
field's doctrines, it is important to bear in mind, that, in 1744,
Moravianism, or rather Zinzendorfism, had turned the doctrine
of justification by faith only into an antinomian channel ; and
now, in 1770, the same thing was practically being done by
not a few who, at all events, were called Methodists. Mr.
Fletcher's description of the antinomianism of the period is
a frightful picture; and though not so applicable to the fol-
lowers of Wesley as to those of the Countess of Huntingdon's
connexion, yet the former were not so free from the anti-
nomian poison as they should have been. Hence the publica-
tion of Wesley's theological theses ; substantially the same
as he had enunciated in 1744; but not so guardedly expressed.
As they led to the longest and bitterest controversy in
Wesley's history, we subjoin them in their entirety.
"We said, in 1744, 'We have leaned too much toward Calvinism.'
Wherein ?
" I. With regard to man^s faithfulness. Our Lord himself taught us to
use the expression ; and we ought never to be ashamed of it. We ought
steadily to assert, on His authority, that, if a man is not 'faithful in the
unrighteous mammon,' God will not give him the tt'iie riches.
himself was the sole maker and vendor; and which, while of great use to
the afflicted, and a source of income to the poor itinerant, did not in the
least interfere with the business of others ; but even Lowes was obliged to
give up the itinerancy, when, for the sake of the suffering, and, for the
benefit of his numerous family, he refused to give up his balsam. In
1 771, he was compelled to retire from the itinerant work, partly for the
reason just mentioned, and partly on the ground of health, and, for about
a quarter of a century afterwards, acted as a local preacher at Newcastle
on Tyne, and supported himself, his wife, and his children, chiefly by the
sale of his useful medicine. Three months after his retirement, Wesley
wrote to him the following, now for the first time published.
" Norwich, November 10, 1771.
" Dear Matthew, — You should do all you can ; otherwise want of
exercise will not lessen, but increase your disorder. Certainly there is no
objection to your making balsam, while you are not considered as a
travelling preacher. I am, with love to sister Lowes, your affectionate
brother, " J. WESLEY."
1 Minutes, 1744.
Doctrinal Mmtites.
/o
"2. With regard to 'ix.wrking for life. This also our Lord has expressly 1770
commanded us: 'Labour/ fpya^eo-^e, literally 'Work' 'for the meat that . ,
endureth to everlasting life.' And, in fact, every believer, till he comes to
glory, works for as well asfrotii life.
"3. We have received it as a maxim, that 'a man is to do nothing in
order to justification.' Nothing can be more false. Whoever desires to
find favour with God should ' cease from evil, and learn to do well.'
Whoever repents should do ' works meet for repentance.' And if this is
not in order to find favour, what does he do them for?
" Review the whole affair : i. Who of us is now accepted of God ?
He that now believes in Christ with a loving and obedient heart.
" 2. But who among those that never heard of Christ ? He that feareth
God and worketh righteousness, according to the light he has.
"3. Is this the same with 'he that is sincere' ? Nearly, if not quite.
"4. Is not this ' salvation by works'? Not by the Jiierit of works, but
by works as a condition.
"5. What have we been disputing about for these thirty years? I am
afraid, about -words.
" 6. As to merit itself, of which we have been so dreadfully afraid ; we
are rewarded 'according to our works,' yea, 'because of our works.' How
does this differ from, for the sake of our works? And how differs this
from secundum merita operum ? as our works deserve f Can you split
this hair? I doubt I cannot.
" 7. The grand objection to one of the preceding propositions is drawn
from matter of fact. God does in fact justify those, who, by their own
confession, neither feared God nor wrought righteousness. Is this an
exception to the general rule? It is a doubt, God makes any exception at
alL But how are we sure, that the person in question never did fear God
and work righteousness ? His own saying so is not proof ; for we
know, how all that are convinced of sin undervalue themselves in every
respect.
" 8. Does not talking of a justified or a sanctified state tend to mislead
men ? almost naturally leading them to trust in what was done in one
moment ? Whereas we are every hour and every moment pleasing or
displeasing to God, 'according to our works' ; — according to the whole of
our inward tempers, and our outward behaviour."
What was the result of these loosely worded propositions }
The answer to this will extend over several years ; but suffice
it to say at present that the publication gave huge offence to
the whole host of Calvinistic Methodists; and Lady Hunting-
don declared, that whoever did not wholly disavow the theses
should quit her college. Mr. Benson, her classical master, so
far from disavowing, defended them, and hence sprung up a
correspondence between Wesley and himself, from which the
following are extracts.
74 Life and Times of Wesley.
1770 "Bristol, October 5, 1770.
~ ^ " Dear Joseph, — I am glad you had the courage to speak your mind
"^ on so critical an occasion. At all hazards, do so still; only with all
possible tenderness and respect. She is much devoted to God, and has a
thousand valuable and amiable qualities. There is no great fear that I
should be prejudiced against one whom I have intimately known for these
thirty years. And I know what is in man ; therefore, I make large
allowance for human weaknesses. But what you say is exactly the state
of the case. They are 'jealous of their authority.' Truly, there is no
cause : Longe mea discrepat illi et vox et 7'afio. I fear and shun, not
desire, authority of any kind. Only when God lays that burden upon me,
I bear it, for His and the people's sake. * Child,' said my father to me
when I was young, 'you think to carry everything by dint of argument ;
but you will find, by-and-by, how very little is ever done in the world by
clear reason.' Very little indeed ! Passion and prejudice govern the
world ; only under the name of reason. It is our part, by religion and
reason, to counteract them all we can. It is yours, in particular, to do all
that in you lies to soften the prejudices of those that are round about you,
and to calm the passions from which they spring. Blessed are the peace-
makers ! Whatever I say, it will be all one. They will find fault, because
I say it. There is implicit envy at my power (so called), and a jealousy
rising therefrom. Hence prejudice in a thousand forms ; hence objections
springing up like mushrooms. And while these causes remain, they will
spring up, whatever I can do or say. However, keep thyself pure ; and
then there need be no strangeness between you and, dear Joseph, your
affectionate brother,
"John Wesley." ^
" London, November 30, 1 770.
" Dear Joseph, — For several years, I have been convinced that I had
not done my duty with regard to that valuable woman; that I had not
told her what, I was thoroughly assured, no one else would dare to do, and
what I knew she would bear from no other person, but possibly might bear
from me. But, being unwilling to give her pain, I put it off from time to
time. At length, I did not dare to delay any longer, lest death should
call one of us hence. So I, at once, delivered my own soul, by telling her
all that was in my heart. It was my business, my proper business, so to
do ; as none else either could or would do it. Neither did I at all take too
much upon me : I know the office of a Christian minister. If she is not
profited, it is her own fault, not mine : I have done my duty, and I do not
know there is one charge in that letter which was either unjust, unim-
portant, or aggravated ; any more than that against the doggerel hymns,
which are equally an insult upon poetry and common sense.
" I am, dear Joseph, your affectionate brother,
John Wesley." ^
1 Wesley's Works, vol. xii., p. 385. ^ n^jj, p_ 387.
A fiti- Calvinian Publications.
/D
The above refers to a letter which Wesley had addressed 1770
to Lady Huntingdon ; but which has never yet been pub- AgTe?
lished. Evidently it was faithful, and also unpalatable. It
seems to have strengthened prejudices against him, instead of
removing them. His position also was not improved by
anti-Calvinian publications over which he had no control,
Mr. William Mason, who had been one of Wesley's class-
leaders, but had left him, and was now a magistrate of the
county of Surrey, and resided at Rotherhithe Wall,^ issued his
" Axe laid to the Root of Antinomian Licentiousness ; ex-
tracted from the works of Mr. Flavel," 1770: 8vo, 36 pages.
Another writer, signing himself " Academicus," gave to the
public a small octavo volume of 124 pages, entitled "The
Church of England Vindicated from the Rigid Notions of
Calvinism " ; in which Sir Richard Hill is severely, perhaps
abusively, flagellated for his virulent attack on Dr. Adams
of Shrewsbury, and the Rev. William Romaine is charged
with preaching a sermon which " shocked every serious and
rational Christian that heard it." All these incidents had to
do with the lamentable anger and bitterness of the memorable
Calvinian controversy which will soon demand attention.
The sessions of the conference of 1770 being ended,
Wesley set out for Cornwall, where he spent the next three
weeks. Returning to Bristol, he and his brother, at the
beginning of October, agreed, at the request of the society,
to administer to them the Lord's supper every other Sunday ;
which arrangement, of course, rendered it necessary, that
an ordained clergyman should reside at Bristol, or in its
neighbourhood.
The rest of the year was occupied with his usual journeys to
Oxfordshire, Bedfordshire, Northamptonshire, Hertfordshire,
Norfolk, and Kent. Poor Whitefield was dead ; and Wesley,
if the way was opened, was quite ready to take his place, by
including America within the bounds of his vast IMethodist
circuit. Hence the following to Mrs. Marston, of Worcester.
^^ December 14, 1770.
"My dear Sister, — If I live till spring, and should have a clear,
pressing call, I am as ready to embark for America, as for Ireland. All
^ " Life and Times of Countess of Huntingdon," vol. i., p. 364,
76 Life and Times of Wesley.
1770 places are alike to me: I am attached to none in particular. Wherever
~ , the work of our Lord is to be carried on, that is my place for to-day.
'^ And we live only for to-day : it is not our part to take thought for
to-morrow.
" I am, dear Molly, your affectionate brother,
"John Wesley."^
On Saturday, September 29, while on his way to Boston,
in New England, Whitefield, at the importunity of the people,
preached at Exeter, in the open air, a sermon nearly two
hours long. At six o'clock next morning he was dead. A
friend, addressing him just before he commenced his last
sermon, said, " Sir, you are more fit to go to bed than to
preach." "True," replied the dying evangelist; and then turning
aside, he clasped his hands, and, looking up, said: "Lord Jesus,
I am weary in Thy work, but not of Thy work." Whitefield
was buried, where he died, at Newburyport, Every mark of
respect was shown to his remains. All the bells in the town
tolled, and the ships in the harbour fired mourning guns, and
hung their flags half-mast high. In Georgia, all the black
cloth in the stores was bought up, and the church was hung
with mourning ; the governor and council met at the state-
house in habiliments of sorrow, and went in procession to
hear a funeral sermon.
Whitefield intended to be interred in Tottenham Court
chapel, and had told the congregation, that he should like
the Wesley brothers to be interred beside him. " We will,"
said he, " all lie together. You refuse them entrance here
while living : they can do you no harm when they are dead."^
Whitefield's wish was not realised ; but, at length, W^esley
was admitted to Whitefield's pulpit.
The Rev. Mr. Joss announced in Tottenham Court chapel
on November ii, that, on the sabbath following, Wesley
would preach a sermon there on Whitefield's death, as it had
long ago been agreed between the two, that whichever sur-
vived the other should preach the deceased's funeral discourse.^
An immense multitude assembled. " It was," says Wesley,
" an awful season ; all were as still as night." On the same
^ Methodist Magazine, 1826, p. 752.
^ J. Pawson's manuscripts.
^ Lloyd'' s Evening Post, Nov. 16, 1770.
Death of Whitcjicld. 77
day, he preached again in Whitefield's tabernacle in Moor- 17 7°
fields. The hour appointed was half-past five ; but the place Age 67
was filled at three, and Wesley began at four. His text was
the same at both places : " Let me die the death of the
righteous, and let my last end be like his ! " Whitefield's
characteristics were described as consisting of " unparalclled
zeal, indefatigable activity, tender heartedness to the afflicted,
and charitableness toward the poor, the most generous friend-
ship, nice and unblemished modesty, frankness and openness
of conversation, unflinching courage, and steadiness in what-
ever he undertook for his Master's sake." Wesley then
sketched the doctrines Whitefield preached, and concluded
thus.
"These are the fundainental doctrines which he everywhere insisted
on ; and may they not be summed up in two words,— the new birth, and
justification by faith 1 These let us insist upon with all boldness, at all
times, and in all places. Keep close to these good, old, unfashionable
doctrines, how many soever contradict and blaspheme. Go on, my bre-
thren, in the name of the Lord, and in the power of His might. Let brother
no more lift up sword against brother ; rather put ye on, as the elect of
God, bowels of mercies, humbleness of mind, brotherly kindness, gentle-
ness, longsuffering, forbearing one another in love. Let the time past
suffice for strife, envy, contention ; for biting and devouring one another.
O God, with Thee no word is impossible ! O that Thou wouldest
cause the mantle of Thy prophet, whom Thou hast taken up, now to fall
on us that remain ! Take away from us all anger and wrath, and
bitterness ; all clamour and evil speaking ! Let Thy Spirit so rest
upon us, that from this hour we may be kind to each other, tender
hearted, forgiving one another, even as God for Christ's sake hath for-
given us ! "
Well did such sentiments harmonise with the spirit and the
life of Wesley's old and faithful friend ; and mournful is the
fact, that they were so soon utterly ignored by the party of ,
which Whitefield had been the chief. No sooner was Wesley's
sermon preached and published, than it was attacked, because
he had omitted to mention the election and final perseveiance
of the saints. His doctrines of" the new birth and justification
by faith were a defective, precarious scheme, and abortive as
to saving purposes ; because, according to his tenets, a man
may be justified by faith, and be born again, and yet never
enjoy eternal life, unless he does more for himself, to make
yS Life and Times of Wesley.
his salvation effectual, than has been done for him by the
blood and righteousness of Christ." ^
Whitefield bequeathed his orphan house estate in Georgia,
with all its " buildings, lands, and negroes," " to that elect lady,
that mother in Israel, that mirror of true and undefiled religion,
the Right Honourable Selina, Countess Dowager of Hunting-
don." His two chapels in London, with his books and furni-
ture in the Tabernacle house, were left to his "worthy, trusty,
tried friends, Messrs. Daniel West and Robert Keen." Within
the last three years, he had become possessed, by legacies, of
about ^^"1700, including ;^700 accruing to him at his wife's
decease ; and this amount he bequeathed to a whole host of
friends, the largest share falling to the Countess of Hunting-
don ; while, in an addendum to his will, he says : " I also leave
a mourning ring to my honoured and dear friends and disin-
terested fellow labourers, the Rev. Messrs. John and Charles
Wesley, in token of my indissoluble union with them, in
heart and Christian affection, notwithstanding our differences
in judgment about some particular points of doctrine. Grace
be with all them, of whatever denomination, that love our
Lord Jesus, our common Lord, in sincerity."^
Thus died one of the greatest Christian orators that ever
lived, — a man who, though often heavily afflicted, preached, in
four-and-thirty years, upwards of eighteen thousand sermons,^
many of them in the open air, and often to enormous crowds,
and in the teeth of brutal persecution.*
Space forbids enlargement; but, perhaps, two unpublished
letters, belonging to this period, may be welcome. The first
was addressed to Matthew Lowes, and the second to Miss
Foard, who afterwards became IMrs. Thornton, of ^6, Black-
man Street, Southwark.
"London, October 13. 1770.
"My dear Brother, — Health you shall have, if health be best; if
not, sickness will be a greater blessing. I am glad you have Dr. Wilson
' Gospel Magazine, \T]'i, p. 39.
2 Lloyd's Evening Post, 1771, pp. 127, 139.
8 Gospel Magazine, 1776, p. 443.
* Poor Whitefield was pelted even after he was dead. In the Annual
Register, for 1770, it is wickedly stated, that his last visit to America was
owing "to an attachment to a woman, by whom he had a child while his
wife was living ;" and it is added, that " this child was the first infant
ever entered into his orphan house in Georgia"!
Original Letters.
Age 67
near. A more skilful man, I suppose, is not in England. If you should 1770
continue weak, (as I did from November to March,) good is the will of
the Lord. You are not a superannuated preacher : but you are a super-
numerary, I believe one of your boys is rejoicing in the love of God.
" I am, with love to sister Lowes, dear Matthew, your affectionate
^''°^h^'"' "J- WESLEY."
" December 29, 1770.
" My dear Sister, — When wc had an opportunity of spending a day
or two together, you convinced me that you fear and love God, and desire
to enjoy all His promises. And I found you less prejudiced, than I expected,
against the doctrine of Christian perfection. I only want you to ex-
perience this : to be ' all faith, all gentleness, all love.' Labour to be wise,
and yet simple ! To steer between the extremes of neglecting to culti-
vate your understanding, which is right ; and leaning to it, which is
fatally wrong. And be free and open with, my dear Nancy, your affec-
tionate brother, «T "Wesley"
Little more, in reference to 1770, remains to be related.
To a great extent, mob violence was ended ; but Wesley was
still the target at which literary malice shot its shafts. The aid
of the Muses was again invoked, and some unknown poetaster
issued an octavo pamphlet of 39 pages, entitled, " The
Perfections of God, — a standing Rule to try all Doctrines and
Experience. A Poem humbly offered to the consideration of
Mr. John Wesley and his followers." This was evidently the
production of one of his Calvinistic friends. Hence the fol-
lowing—
" Shall Wesley sow his hurtful tares,
And scatter round a thousand snares,
Telling how God from wrath may turn,
And love the soul He thought to burn.
And how again His mind may move.
To hate, where He has vowed to love.
How all mankind He fain would save.
Yet longs for what He cannot have.
Industrious thus to sound abroad
A disappointed, changing God.''"
Again, in reference to the " Hymn on God's Everlasting
Love," we have the following choice vwrceau.
" Blush Wesley, blush, be filled with shame,
Doom thy vile poem to the flame ;
What tongue thy horrid crime can tell ?
Put saints to sing the song of hell !
8o Life and Times of Wesley.
1770 Haste hence to Rome, thy proper place ;
Ao~~67 Why should we share in thy disgrace ?
We need no greater proof to see,
Thy blasphemies with hers agree."
In addition to the above, there was pubHshed a sermon
of 32 pages, 8vo, entitled " Methodistical Deceit: a Sermon
preached in the parish church of St. Matthew, Bethnal Green,
by Haddon Smith, curate of the said church."
- It is right to say that Mr. Smith's discourse is levelled
against the Calvinistic Methodists, of whom, however, he
unfortunately speaks as though they were all the Methodists
that existed. Remembering the recent origin of the Method-
ist movement, and the unparalelled opposition it had been
its lot to encounter, it is somewhat amusing to find the
Bethnal Green curate describing the Methodists as " the
overbearing sect " ; perhaps it was a lapsus lingucB ; or perhaps
the Rev. Mr. Smith began to see, that crushing the system
with the iron heel of persecution only diffused its fragrance
wider ; and that, after all, Methodism, instead of dying, was
every year more vigorous than ever. Mr. Smith was severely
handled in a pamphlet of 40 pages, with the title, " Letters to
the Rev. Mr. Haddon Smith,' occasioned by his Curious
Sermon entitled Methodistical Deceit ; by Philalethes."
Wesley's own publications, in 1770, were as follows.
1. "An Extract from Dr. Young's Night Thoughts, on
Life, Death, and Immortality." i2mo, 241 pages. Wesley
professed to have left out all the lines in Young, which he
"apprehended to be either childish, or fiat, or turgid, or
obscure " ; and appended brief explanations of the words and
phrases, which he thought would be scarcely understood by
unlearned readers.
2. "Minutes of several Conversations between the Rev.
Messrs. John and Charles Wesley and others." 8vo, 60
pages. This was a new and enlarged edition of the minutes
published in 1763, embracing minutes of all the conferences
held from that period to the year 1 770.
3. "A Sermon on the Death of the Rev. Mr. George
Whitefield." 8vo, 32 pages.
4. " Free Thoughts on the Present State of Public Affairs."
8vo, 47 pages. This was published in the midst of the terrible
Rev. Atigiishts Toplady. 8i
national confusion, produced by the dissolute and unprincipled ^77°
anarchist, — the infamous John Wilkes. The pamphlet has Age 67
been already noticed in a previous chapter.^
5. It was Wesley's purpose to leave Augustus Toplady in
the hands of Walter Sellon. He did this, in one respect, but
not in another. For instance, he published a small i2mo
tract of eight pages, with the title, "What is an Arminian .''"
He writes: "To say, ' this man is an Arminian,' has the same
effect on many hearers as to say, ' this is a mad dog.' It
puts them into a fright at once; they run away from him with
all speed and diligence ; and will hardly stop, unless it be to
throw a stone at the dreadful and mischievous animal." He
then proceeds to show, that the differences between an Armi-
nian and a Calvinist may all be reduced to a single sentence,
— the Calvinist believes that God has eternally and absolutely
decreed to save such and such persons, and no others ; that
these cannot resist the saving grace that He imparts ; and
that they cannot finally fall from that grace, which they are
not able to resist. An Arminian holds doctrines just the
opposite of these. Wesley concludes his tract by advising
both Arminian and 'Calvinist preachers never to use, either in
public or private, the word " Calvinist," or " Arminian," as a
term of reproach, seeing this was neither better nor worse than
calling names, — a practice as inconsistent with good sense and
good manners as it is with Christianity itself.
6. Besides this, Wesley issued another tract, entitled, " The
Doctrine of Absolute Predestination Stated and Asserted. By
the Rev. Mr. A, ^T ." i2mo, 12 pages. This was a
faithful abridgment of Toplady's translation of Zanchius, with-
out note or comment, except a short advertisement at the
beginning, and a paragraph at the end, both of which we
give verbatim.
"Advertisement. — It is granted, that the ensuing tract is, in good mea-
sure, a translation. Nevertheless, considering the unparalleled modesty
and self diffidence of the young translator, and the tenderness wherewith he
treats his opponents, it may well pass for an original."
'Wesley's "Free Thoughts" were sharply criticised by an able writer,
in 1771, in an octavo pamphlet of 58 pages, with the title of "A Letter to
the Rev. Mr. John Wesley ; in answer to his late pamphlet, entitled
* Free Thoughts on the Present State of Public Affairs.' "
VOL. IIL G
82 Life and Times of Wesley.
1770 This was stinging ; especially when compared with the con-
A^67 eluding paragraph—
"The sum of all is this: One in twenty (suppose) of mankind are
elected ; nineteen in twenty are reprobated. The elect shall be saved,
do what they will ; the reprobate shall be damned, do what they can.
Reader, believe this, or be damned. Witness my hand.
"A T ."
This was the whole of Wesley's offending. His tract, we
again affirm, was an honest, faithful abridgment of Toplady's
pretended translation ; but the truth is, by divesting the work
of Toplady of its cloudy verbiage, the Calvinistic theory was
presented in a form enough to horrify every man of reason and
religion. What was the result .'' Wesley's Abridgment was
issued in the month of March, 1770. Poor Toplady seems to
have become insane with anger; and, before the same month
expired, had completed his answer, which was published
forthwith, under the title of " A Letter to the Rev. Mr. John
Wesley: relative to his pretended Abridgment of Zanchius on
Predestination." 8v^o, 30 pages. The most charitable excuse
for this angry writer is, that he had, in a paroxysm of morti-
fied vanity, lost his balance, and was now non compos mentis.
Wesley had honestly abridged his work ; and had written the
two brief paragraphs already quoted. That was all : and, for
this, the irate young man of thirty, who in former years had
written to Wesley in terms of the most filial respect, now tells
him that, " for more than thirty years past he has been endea-
vouring to palm on his credulous followers his pernicious
doctrines, with all the sophistry of a Jesuit, and the dictatorial
authority of a pope." Wesley is charged with acting " the
ignoble part of a lurking, sly assassin." He is exhorted to
" renounce the low, serpentine cunning, which puts him on
falsifying Avhat he finds himself unable to refute ; to dismiss
those dirty subterfuges (the last resources of mean, malicious
impotence), which degrade the man of parts into a lying
sophister, and sink a divine into the level of an oyster woman."
Wesley is told, "that it once depended on the toss of a
shilling whether he should be a Calvinist or an Arminian.
Tails fell uppermost, and he resolved to be an universalist."
The elect Toplady continues : " possessed of more than ser-
pentine elability, you cast your slough, not once a year, but,
Rev. Atigiistus Top lady. %'^
almost, once an hour. Hence, your innumerable ijiconsistencies, 177°
and '^di^xd.xit self contradictions ; they<^m';/^ of your principles, Age 67
and the incoherence of your religious system. Somewhat like
the necromantic soup in the tragedy of ' Macbeth,' your doc-
trines may be stirred into a chaotic jumble, but witchcraft
itself would strive in vain to bring them into coalition." The
gentlemanly polemic then informs Wesley, that he shall not
hold himself obliged to again enter the lists with him, if he
" descends to his customary recourse of false quotations,
despicable invective, and unsupported dogmatisms. An oppo-
nent," continues this model of polite behaviour, " an opponent,
who thinks to add weight to his arguments by scurrility and
abuse, resembles the insane person who rolled him^self in the
mud, in order to make himself fine. I would no more enter
into a formal controversy with such a scribbler, than I would
contend, for the wall, with a chimney sweeper."
Is it surprising that, after this, Calvinism was discussed at
the conference of 1770 ; and that, just before it commenced
its sittings, Wesley wrote the following unpublished letter to
his friend, Mr. Merryweather, at Yarm .''
"York, June 24, 1770.
" My dear Brother, — Mr, Augustus Toplady I know well ; but I
do not fight with chimney sweepers. He is too dirty a writer for me to
meddle with ; I should only foul my fingers. I read his title page, and
troubled myself no farther. I leave him to Mr, Sellon. He cannot be in
better hands.
" As long as you are seeking and expecting to love God with all your
heart, so long your soul will live.
" 1 am your affectionate brother,
"John Wesley."
I77I.
1 77 1 '"T^HE year 1771 was one of unceasing conflict. The first
Age^S -'- t^^'o months, as usual, were spent in London, during
which Wesley's wife, in one of her insane piques, and without
assigning the slightest reason, unceremoniously left his house
in London, and started for her own in Pilgrim Street, New-
castle. It was on this occasion that Wesley wrote the words
so often quoted : " Noii cam rcliqui ; iioii dimisi; non rcvo-
cabo."
On the 3rd of March, Wesley set out for Ireland, where he
laboured for the next few months.
Affairs in Scotland were a source of increasing anxiety.
Hence the following letter to Lady Maxwell, in reference to
Alexander McNab, one of his itinerants, and the Rev. Richard
De Courcy, who was about to become minister in Lady
Glenorchy's chapel, Edinburgh.
"London, Ja7tiiary 2\, 1771.
" My dear Lady, — Although Mr. McNab is quite clear as to justifica-
tion by faith, and is, in general, a sound and good preacher, yet, I fear,
he is not clear of blame in this. He is too warm and impatient of contra-
diction, otherwise he must be lost to all common sense, to preach against
final perseverance in Scotland. From the first hour that I entered the
kingdom, it was a sacred rule with me never to preach on any controverted
point, — at least, 7iot in a controversial way. Any one may see that this
is only to put a sword into our enemies' hands. It is the direct way to
increase all their prejudices, and to make all our labours fruitless.
" You will shortly have a trial of another kind. ]\Ir. De Courcy purposes
to set out for Edinburgh in a few days. He was from a child a member
of our societies in the south of Ireland. There he received remission of
sins, and was, for some time, groaning for full redemption. But when he
came to Dublin the Phihstines were upon him, and soon prevailed over
him. Quickly, he was conv inced that * there is no perfection,' and that
' all things depend on absobite and iinchatigeable decrees.^ At first, he was
exceedingly warm upon these heads; now, he is far more calm. His
natural temper, I think, is good ; he is open, friendly, and generous. He
has also a good understanding, and is not unacquainted with learning,
though not deeply versed therein. He has no disagreeable person, a
pleasing address, and is a lively as well as sensible preacher. Now, when
Rev. Richard De Co2i7'cy. 85
you add to this that he is quite new, and x&xy young, you may judge how 1771
he will be admired and caressed. How will a raw, inexperienced youth . ' „
be able to encounter this ? If there be not the greatest of miracles to
preserve him, will it not turn his brain? And may he not then do far
more hurt than either Mr. W or Mr. T did? Will he not prevent
your friend from going on to perfection ? Nay, may he not shake you
also ? At present, indeed, he is in an exceedingly loving spirit. But will
that continue long? There will be danger on the one hand if it does \
there will be danger on the other if it does not.
" It does not appear, that any great change has been wrought in our
neighbours by Mr. Whitefield's death. He had fixed the prejudice so
deep, that even he himself was not able to remove it ; yet, our congrega-
tions have increased exceedingly, and the work of God increases on every
side. I am glad you use more exercise. It is good for both body and
soul. As soon as Mr. De Courcy is come, I shall be glad to hear how the
prospect opens. You will then need a larger share of the wisdom from
above ; and I trust you will write with all openness to, my dear lady, your
ever affectionate servant,
"John Wesley." 1
It was Wesley who obtained Mr. De Courcy's services for
Lady Glenorchy. He knew the man, and thought highly of
him, but also saw his danger; and hence the warning to Lady
Maxwell. It would be a pleasant task to sketch the subse-
quent career of this devoted Irishman ; but, at present, we
must confine ourselves to Edinburgh, De Courcy set out for
the northern metropolis, as Wesley had said he would ; and,
immediately on his arrival at Newcastle, addressed to Wesley
the following.
"February (), 177 \.
" Reverend and dear Sir, — Yesterday evening, after a very tedious
journey, the Lord brought me safe to Newcastle. When I reflect on the
fatigue and dangers which attend travelling, I should be astonished above
measure that )'ou have so indefatigably persevered in all the labours of an
itinerant life for so many years, were I not well assured that you have been
supernaturally assisted in body and mind for that extensive work to which
God has eminently chosen you.
" I write this in Mr. McNab's chamber, with whom, and Mr. Hanby, I
find great fellowship of spirit. I have accepted your kind invitation, and
purpose taking up my abode with them till Monday, when I set out for
Edinburgh. I would stay longer with your dear people here, but that 1
find Lady Glenorchy is particularly anxious for my speedy arrival in
* Lady Maxwell's Life, p. 72.
Age 68
86 Life and Times of Wesley.
1771 Edinburgh. As my situation there will expose me to diversified trials, do
dear sir, pray that I may be kept
' Humble, teachable, and mild.
Patient as a little child,'
" I remain, reverend and dear sir, your most affectionate, but unworthy
brother,
"Richard De Courcy." •
A few days after De Courcy's arrival, Wesley wrote a second
time to Lady Maxwell, as follows.
"February 26, 1771.
"My dear Lady, — I cannot but think the chief reason of the little
good done by our preachers in Edinburgh is the opposition which has
been made by the ministers of Edinburgh, as well as by the false brethren
from England. These steeled the hearts of the people against all the good
impressions which might otherwise have been made ; so that the same
preachers, by whom God has constantly wrought, not only in various
parts of England, but likewise in the northern parts of Scotland, were in
Edinburgh only not useless. They felt a damp upon their spirits ; they
had not their usual liberty of speech ; and the word they spoke seemed to
rebound upon them, and not to sink into the hearts of the hearers. At my
first coming, I usually find something of this myself ; but the second or
third time of preaching, it is gone.
" I think it will not be easy for any one to show us, either, that Christ
did not die for all, or, that He is not willing as well as able to cleanse
from all sin, even in the present world. If your steady adherence to these
great truths be termed bigotry, yet you have no need to be ashamed.
You are reproached for Christ's sake, and the spirit of glory and of Christ
shall rest upon you. Perhaps our Lord may use you to soften some
of the harsh spirits, and to preserve Lady Glenorchy, or Mr. De Courcy,
from being hurt by them.
" I am, my dear lady, your very affectionate servant,
"John Wesley." ^
From these letters, it is painfully apparent that the Calvin-
istic controversy was not confined to England. Edinburgh
rang with discordant notes ; and, in five months after Mr.
De Courcy's coming, Lady Glenorchy dismissed Wesley's
preachers from her chapel, assigning, as her reason, that they
were not Calvinists.^
South of the Tweed there were sounds of the coming
battle ; hence the following extract from a letter to Miss
Bishop.
' MetJiodist Magazine, 1784, p. 388.
2 Lady Maxwell's Life, p. 22. ^ Ibid.
Ajre
Sounds of coming Battle. 87
" February i6, 1771. 1771
" My dear Sister, — .... Legality, with most that use that term,
really means tenderness of conscience. There is no propriety in the word, if
one would take it for seeking justification by works. Considering, there-
fore, how hard it is to fix the meaning of that odd term, and how dread-
fully it has been abused, I think it highly advisable for all the Methodists
to lay it quite aside.
"If Mr. Shirley could find any other doctrine, which he thought was
peculiarly mine, he would be as angry at it as he is at Christian perfection.
But it is all well : we are to go forward, whoever goes back or turns aside.
Perhaps we may see a new accomplishment of Solomon's words, * He
that reproveth a man shall afterward find more favour than he who
flattereth with his tongue.' But, be that as it may, I have done my duty :
I could no otherwise have delivered my own soul ; and no offence at all
would have been given thereby, had not pride stifled both religion and
generosity. But my letter' is now out of date : it is mentioned no more ;
there is a more plausible occasion found, namely, those eight terrible pro-
positions which conclude the minutes of our conference. At the instance
of some who were sadly frightened thereby, I have revised them over and
over ; I have considered them in every point of view ; and truly the more
I consider them, the more I like them. The more fully I am convinced,
not only that they are true, — agreeable both to Scripture and sound
experience, — but, that they contain truths of the deepest importance, and
such as ought to be continually inculcated by those who would be pure
from the blood of all men.
" Your affectionate brother,
"John Wesley." 2
Benson had been dismissed from Trevecca, in the month of
January, for defending Wesley's minutes ; and now Fletcher,
the president of the college, informed the Countess of Hunt-
ingdon, that, if all Arminians were to be expelled, he must be
expelled. This was a serious matter. Fletcher, at Trevecca, had
been, according to Benson, " almost an angel in human flesh."
" Prayer, praise, love, and zeal were the element in which he
lived. His one employment was to call^ entreat, and urge
others to ascend with him to the glorious Source of being and
blessedness. He had leisure comparatively for nothing else.
Languages, arts, sciences, grammar, rhetoric, logic, even
divinity itself, were all laid aside, when he appeared in the
schoolroom among the students. His full heart would not
suffer him to be silent ; and the students were readier to
^ Doubtless his letter to Lady Huntingdon.
"^ Methodist Magazine, 1805, p. 279.
88 Life and Times of Wesley.
1 7 71 hearken to him than to attend to Sallust, Virgil, or Cicero.
A^68 Soon, they were all in tears; and then he would say, *As
many of you as are athirst for the fulness of the Spirit, follow
me into my room.' " Away they trooped after him, and
would continue praying, one after another, for hours together,
till they could bear to kneel no longer; Fletcher, in the midst,
so filled with the love of God, that, more than once, he cried,
" O my God, withhold Thy hand, or the vessel will burst ! "^
Such a man in such a place was invaluable ; but he was not
the man to truckle in the presence of arbitrary power. Hence
the following to Wesley.
" Madeley, February 20, 1771.
"Reverend and dear Sir, — I fear we are going, or are already gone,
from our plan of Catholicism at the college. Mr. Benson's affair has made
me tell my mind to our Deborah, about bigotry, partiality, prejudice, and
everything that seemed to me contrary to the Christian spirit in some late
transactions. The answer was, that if one half of the things objected to
by me was true, there would be room for the cruelty of my charges ; but
facts and words have been grossly misrepresented. Therefore, my mouth
is shut so far.
" This, however, I have insisted, and do insist, upon, if every Arminian
must quit the college, I am discharged for one ; for I cannot give up the
possibility of the salvation of all any more than I can give up the truth
and love of God.
"Secondly, I will be no party man, nor give up my connections with any
that fear God, much less with Mr. Wesley, who shall be always welcome
to my pulpit, and I make no doubt will welcome me to his.
" Thirdly, nobody shall prevent my following after an entire devoted-
ness of heart to God, by baiting my Christian hopes and privileges under
the name of perfection.
" To this, I have received no particular answer ; but, as I set out for the
college to-day, I may get one viva voce.
" Though no letter writer, I am and shall always remain, reverend
and dear sir, your ready though unprofitable servant,
"John Fletcher." ^
The result of Fletcher's visit to the college is given in the
subjoined extracts from letters sent to Benson.
" March 22, 1771.
" On my arrival at the college, I found all very quiet, I fear, through
the enemy's keeping his goods in peace. While I preached, I found
myself as much shackled as ever I was in my life ; and, after private
' Wesley's Life of Fletcher. 2 Manuscript letter.
Wesley and the " Gospel Magazifie." 89
prayer, I concluded I was not in my place. The same day I resigned my 1 77 1
office to my lady, and on Wednesday to the students and the Lord. Last ^"53
Friday I left them all in peace, the servant, but no more the president, of
the college."^
" Mr. Shirley has sent my lady a copy of part of the minutes of the
last conference, namely, of the year 1770. They were called horrible and
abominable. My lady told me, she must turn against them; attd that
nvhoever did ttot fully disavozu them must quit the college. She accord-
ingly ordered the master and all the students to write their sentiments
upon them without reserve. I did so ; explained them according to Mr.
Wesley's sentiments ; and approved the doctrine, though not cautiously
worded. I concluded by observing, that, as after such a step on my part,
and such a declaration on my lady's, I could no longer, as an honest man,
stay in the college, I took my leave of it ; wishing my lady might find a
minister to preside over it less insufficient than
" John Fletcher." ^
So much respecting Trevecca. Returning to Wesley, we
find him defending himself in the following long letter, pub-
lished in Lloyd's Evening Post for March i, 1771.
" Feb)iiaiy 26, 1 771.
" Sir, — The editor of a monthly publication, pompously called The
Gospel Magazine, has violently fallen upon one and another, who did
not knowingly give him any provocation. And whereas, in other maga-
zines, the accused has liberty to answer for himself, it is not so here.
This gentleman will publish only the charge ; but not the defence. What
can a person, thus injuriously treated, do ? To publish pamphlets, on
every head, would not answer the end, for the answer would not come into
near so many hands as the objection. Is there then abetter way than to
appeal to candid men, in one of the public papers, by which means the
antidote will operate both as widely and as speedily as the poison ? This
method, therefore, I take at last, after delaying as long as I could with
innocence.
" In that magazine for last month, there is a waiTn attack upon my ser-
mon on the death of Mr. Whitefield. The first charge is against the
text, ' Let me die the death of the righteous.' ' How improper,' says
Mr. R.,^ 'to apply the words of a mad prophet to so holy a man as
Mr. Whitefield.'
" Improper ! See how doctors differ ! I conceive nothing can possibly
be more proper. If Mr. R. did indeed tell his congregation, some of
whom disliked his attacking my poor text before, ' Let who will be vexed,
I do not care; I will not justify Balaam while I live'; yet, others
imagine nothing would be more suitable than for Balaam junior to use
^ Benson's Life, by Treffry.
^ Wesley's Works, vol. xi., p. 285.
^ Probably Mr. Romaine.
90 Life and Times of Wesley.
iTJi the words of his forefather; especially, as he did not apply them to Mr.
A o~68 Whitefield, but to himself. Surely a poor reprobate may, without offence,
" laz's/i to die like one of the elect ! And I dare say, every one understood
me to mean this, the moment he heard the text. If not, the very hymn
I sung showed to whom I applied the words —
* Oh that, without a lingering groan,
I might the welcome word receive !
My body with my charge lay down,
And cease at once to work and live ! '
" But the main attack is on the sermon itself ; in which I am charged
with asserting a gross falsehood, in the face of God and the congregation,
and that knowing it to be such, namely, that ' the grand fundamental doc-
trines which Mr. Whitefield everywhere preached, were those of the new
birth and justification by faith.' No, says Mr. R., not at all : the grand
fundamental doctrines, which he everywhere preached, were the everlast-
ing covenant between the Father and the Son, and absolute predestina-
tion flowing therefrom.
" I join issue on this head. Whether the doctrines of the eternal
covenant, and of absolute predestination, are the grand fundamental
doctrines of Christianity, or not, I affirm again — (i) that Mr. Whitefield
did not everywhere preach these ; (2) that he did everywhere preach the
new birth, and justification by faith.
" I. He did not everywhere preach the eternal covenant, and ab-
solute predestination. In all the times I myself heard him preach, I
never heard him utter a sentence either on one or the other. Yea, all the
times he preached in West Street chapel, and in our other chapels
throughout England, he did not preach these doctrines at all, no, not in a
single paragraph ; which, by the bye, is a demonstration that he did not
think them' the fundamental doctrines of Christianity.
" 2. Both in West Street chapel, and all our other chapels throughout
England, he did preach the necessity of the new birth, and justification
by faith, as clearly as he has done in his two volumes of printed sermons.
Therefore, all that I have asserted is true, and provable by ten thousand
witnesses.
" Nay, says Mr. R., ' Mr. Whitefield everywhere insisted on other fun-
damental doctrines, from the foundation of which the new birth and
justification by faith take their rise, and with which they are inseparably
connected. These are the everlasting covenant, which was entered into
by the Holy Trinity, and God the Father's everlasting, unchangeable
election of sinners' (in virtue of which a fiftieth part of mankind shall
be saved, do what they will ; and the other forty-nine parts shall be
damned, do what they can). ' These doctrines are not of a less essential
nature than either regeneration or justification. No, by no means ; they
are to the full equally essential to the glory of God. Yea, there is an
inseparable connection between them. This is a tnost essential, a most
/undamental point.' {Magazine, p. 4r.)
" If so, then every one who does not hold it must perish everlastingly.
Wesley and the ''Gospel Magazine^ 91
If, as you here assert, he cannot be justified, then he cannot be saved. 177^
If, as you say, he cannot be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of Cod. ^^^g
"After asserting this, can Mr. R. ever take the name of catholic love
into his mouth.? Is not this the very opposite to it? the height and
depth of bigotry? Does this spirit do honour to his opinion? Can we
conceive anything more horrid? Is it not enough to make a person of
humanity shudder ? Yea, to make his blood run cold ?
" I do not here enter into the merits of the cause. I need not. It is
done to my hands. The whole doctrine of predestination is thoroughly
discussed in those three tracts lately printed: 'An Answer to the Eleven
Letters commonly ascribed to Mr. Hervey'; 'Arguments against General
Redemption Considered' ; and 'Ah Answer to Elisha Coles.' Till these
are seriously and solidly refuted, I have no more to say on that head.
But I must aver, that the excluding all from salvation who do not believe
the horrible decree is a most shocking insult on all mankind, on common
sense, and common humanity.
"I am, etc.,
"John Wesley,"
Of course, this was too pungent to pass without notice.
Accordingly, in the Gospel Alagazine for the month following,
there appeared an incisive review of Sellon's Answer to Elisha
Coles, which is described as " a mite of reprobate silver, cast
into the Foimdery, and coming out thence, with the impress of
that pride, self righteousness, and self sufificiency, natural to
men in their fallen, unrenewed state." Sellon is accused of
" trifling effrontery," and is said " to have sunk far below the
gentleman, and to have lost all appearance of the Christian " ;
and is further designated " the Cardinal Bellarmine of the
day ; the obsequious servant and faithful labourer to his
holiness." n .-
In a subsequent number of the same periodical, published
in the month of May, Wesley's minutes are attacked; the
writer, "A Real Protestant," indignantly asking, "Are not
these the very doctrines of popery, yea, of popery unmasked.-'
Is it not awful that 29,406 souls, who are in Mr. Wesley's
societies, should be so dreadfully seduced from the protestant
doctrines, and deluded into a belief of the doctrines of the
mother of harlots, the whore of Babylon, the Church of
Rome } "
Thus the bitter controversy proceeded. Comment would
be easy ; but we prefer to let the chief actors speak; and, not
to interrupt this painful scene, proceed to give other letters
92 Life and Times of Wesley.
bearing upon the subject, so that the reader may have before
him as full a view of the spirit and behaviour of both parties
as it is possible to furnish.
While on his way to Ireland, Wesley wrote the following to
Fletcher.
" I always did, for between these thirty and forty years, clearly assert
the total fall of man, and his utter inability to do any good of himself ;
the absolute necessity of the grace and Spirit of God to raise even a good
thought or desire in our hearts ; the Lord's rewarding no work, and
accepting of none, but so far as they proceed from His preventing, con-
vincing, and converting grace through the Beloved ; the blood and
righteousness of Christ being the sole meritorious cause of our salvation.
Who is there in England, that has asserted these things more strongly and
steadily than I have done .''" *
The next letter, addressed to Lady Huntingdon, was occa-
sioned by one which her ladyship had sent to Wesley's brother
on the subject of his minutes,^ and was dated " Bath, June 8,
1771." The countess brands the minutes as "popery un-
masked " ; and declares that " all ought to be deemed papists
who do not disown them." She thus concludes : " as you
have no part in this matter, I find it difficult to blame your
brother to you ; while as an honest man I must pity you, as
you must suffer equal disgrace, and universal distrust, from the
supposed union with him." Charles Wesley endorsed this
unworthy letter with the words : " Lady Huntingdon's last ;
unanswered by John Wesley's brother." *
Charles Wesley doubtless communicated the contents to
his brother, who was now in Ireland ; in fact, her ladyship
requested him to do this : and hence the following.
''June 19, 1 771.
" My dear Lady, — Many years since, I saw that ' without holiness
no man shall see the Lord.' I began following after it, and inciting all
with whom I had any intercourse to do the same. Ten years after, God
gave me a clearer view than I had before of the way how to attain this,
namely, by faith in the Son of God ; and, immediately, I declared to all,
* We are saved from sin, we are made holy, by faith.' This I testified in
private, in public, in print ; and God confirmed it by a thousand witnesses.
I have continued to declare this, for above thirty years ; and God has con-
* Fletcher's Vindication, ist Edit., p. 21.
"^ " Life and Times of Countess of Huntingdon," vol. ii., p. 240.
3 Jackson's Life of C. Wesley, vol. ii., p. 256.
Letter to Lady Htuitingdon.
tinued to confirm the word of His grace. But, during this time, well-nigh 1771
all the religious world have set themselves in array against me, and, p^eo,
among the rest, many of my own children, following the example of one '^
of my eldest sons, Mr. Whitefield. Their general cry has been, ' He is
unsound in the faith ; he preaches another gospel ! ' I answer, Whether
it be the same which they preach or not, it is the same which I have
preached for above thirty years. This may easily appear from what I
have published during that whole term. I instance only in three sermons ;
that on ' Salvation by Faith,' printed in the year 1738 ; that on ' The Lord
our Righteousness,' printed a few years since ; and that on Mr. White-
field's funeral, printed only some months ago.
"But it is said, 'Oh but you printed ten lines in August last, which con-
tradict all your other writings.' Be not so sure of this. It is probable, at
least, that I understand my own meaning as well as you do; and that mean-
ing I have yet again declared in the sermon last referred to. By that, inter-
pret those ten lines, and you will understand them better; although I should
think that any one might see, even without this help, that the lines in
question do not refer to the condition of obtaining, but of continuing in
the favour of God. But whether the sentiment contained in these lines
be right or wrong, and whether it be well or ill expressed, the gospel which
I now preach God does still confirm by new witnesses in every place ;
perhaps never so much in this kingdom as within these last three months.
Now, I argue from glaring, undeniable fact : God cannot bear witness to a
lie ; the gospel, therefore, which He confirms must be true in substance.
There may be opinions maintained at the same time which -are not exactly
true ; and who can be secure from these ? Perhaps, I thought myself so
once. When I was much younger than I am now, I thought myself almost
infallible ; but, I bless God, I know myself better now.
" To be short. Such as I am, I love you well. You have one of the
first places in my esteem and affection; and you once had some regard for
me. But it cannot continue if it depends upon my seeing with your eyes,
or on my being in no mistake. What if I was in as many as Mr. Law
himself? If you were, I should love you still, provided your heart was still
right with God. My dear friend, you seem not to have well learned yet
the meaning of those words, which I desire to have continually written
upon my heart, ' Whosoever doth the will of My Father which is in
heaven, the same is My brother, and sister, and mother.'
" I am, my dear lady, your affectionate
"John Wesley." '
Contemporaneously with the above letter, the Rev. Walter
Shirley and Lady Huntingdon sent the following circular to
Wesley, as well as to a large number of their Calvinian friends.
" Sir, — Whereas Mr. Wesley's conference is to be held at Bristol, on
Tuesday, the 6th of August next, it is proposed, by Lady Huntingdon, and
' Methodist Magazine, 1797, p. 563.
94 ^if^ ^^^^ Times of Wesley.
many other Christian friends, (real protestants,) to have a meeting at
Bristol at the same time, of such principal persons, both clergy and laity,
who disapprove of the underwritten minutes ' ; and as the same are
thought injurious to the very f!/nda7nental^ principles of Christianity, it is
further proposed, that they go in a body to the said conference, and insist
upon a formal recantation of the said minutes ; and, in case of a refusal,
that they sign and publish their protest against them. Your presence,
sir, on this occasion is particularly requested ; but, if it should not suit
your convenience to be there, it is desired that you will transmit your
sentiments on the subject to such person as you think proper to produce
them. It is submitted to you, whether it would not be right, in the oppo-
sition to be made to such a dreadful heresy," to recommend it to as many
of your Christian friends, as well of the Dissenters as of the Established
Church, as you can prevail on to be there, the cause being of so public
a nature.
" I am, sir, your obedient serv'ant,
" Walter Shirley.
*' P.S. — Your answer is desired, directed to the Countess of Huntingdon ;
or the Rev. Mr. Shirley ; or John Lloyd, Esq., in Bath ; or Mr. James
Ireland, merchant, Bristol ; or to Thomas Povvis, Esq., at Berwick, near
Shrewsbury ; or to Richard Hill, Esq., at Hawkstone, near Whitchurch,
Shropshire. Lodgings will be provided. Inquire at Mr. Ireland's,
Bristol."
A fine confederacy of elected saints, armed with self invested
papal power to i7isist upon the recantation of poor Wesley and
his heretical preachers !
The modest and self diffident countess and her executive
chaplain apologise for this high handed interference on the
ground that they " were warmly interested in the revival of
spiritual reWgxon and the doctrines of the Reforjuation;" that
they " apprehended that the doctrines contained in the minutes
had the most fatal tendency ; and, in the strongest and most
explicit terms, maintained salvation by ivorks " ; and that
Wesley was not an ordmary personage, but stood "at the head
of near thirty thousand people, — a veteran in the cause of
the gospel, — one of the chiefs in the late reformation."^
One would have thought that, at least, the last mentioned
reason would have led them to adopt a less offensive and more
respectful method of correcting his " dreadful heresy," than
that of marching upon him and his conference eu masse; and
^ The minutes of the conference of 1770.
2 The itatic words are emphasized in the original.
3 Shirley's " Narrative," p. 5.
Shi)' ley s Circidar. 95
imperiously insisting upon his recantation. Surely, it would 177'
not have been too great a condescension for them and their Age68
friends, first of all, to have respectfully solicited of such " a
veteran and chief" an explanation of what he meant ; and, if
they still found him to be in error, to ask for an opportunity
to reason the matter with him and to set him right. But, no ;
this was far too troublesome for the elect of God, who, of
course, were right, and all others wrong; and, hence, the only
action, which would not impinge upon their sacred dignity, was
to march, in solemn phalanx, to the assembly of Wesley and
his poor itinerants, and there " insist upon a formal recanta-
tion'" \ and then, in case the heretics should refuse to yield,
and because the valiant defenders of the truth were without
power to imprison, to banish, or to burn, it was piously pro-
posed that, for want of something more effectual, they should
content themselves with 2, public protest against the pestilential
minutes.
One of Shirley's circulars was handed to Fletcher, the ex-
president of Trevecca, who wrote to Wesley the following
letter, hitherto unpublished.
"Madeley, June 24, 1771.
" Dear Sir, — Vv^hen I left Wales, where I had stood in the gap for
peace, I thought my poor endeavours were not altogether vain. Lady
Huntingdon said she would write civilly to you, and desire you to explain
yourself about your minutes. I suppose you have not heard from her, for
she wrote me word since that she believed she must not meddle in the
affair. At least, that is what I made of her letter. Upon receiving yours
from Chester, I cut off that part of it where you expressed your belief of
what is eminently called by us the doctrine of free grace; and sent it to
the college, with a desire it might be sent to Lady Huntingdon. She has
returned it to me, with a letter, in which she expresses the greatest disap-
probation of it. The purport of her letter is, to charge you with tergiver-
sation, and me with being the dupe of your impositions. She has also
wrote in stronger terms to her college.
"Things, I hoped, would have remained there; but how am I surprised
and grieved to see zeal borrowing the horn of discord, and sounding an
alarm throughout the religious world against you. Mr. Hutton called
upon me last night, and showed me a printed circular, which I suppose is,
or will be, sent to the serious clergy and laity throughout the land. I
have received none, as I have lost, I suppose, my reputation of being
a ' real profestant,' by what I wrote upon your minutes in Wales.
" This is an exact copy of the printed letter.
[Here follows Shirley's circular as above.]
9 6 Life and Times of Wesley.
1 771 "I think it my duty, dear sir, to give you the earliest inteUigence of this
Age 68
bold onset, and to assure you that upon the evangelical principles, men-
tioned in your last letter to me, I, for one, shall be glad to stand by you
and your doctrine to the last, hoping that you will gladly remove stumbling
blocks out of the way of the weak, and alter such expressions as may
create prejudice in the hearts of those who are inclined to admit it.
" I write to Mr. Shirley to expostulate with him, and to request him to
call in his circular letter. He is the last man that should attack you.
His sermons contain propositions much more heretical and anti-Calvin-
istical than your minutes. If my letters have not the desired effect, I
shall probably, if you approve of them and correct them, make them
public for your justification.
" I find Mr. Ireland is to write to make you tamely recant without
measuring swords, or breaking a pike with our real protestants. I wrote
to him also.
" I am, dear sir, your unworthy servant in the gospel,
"John Fletcher.
"To the Rev. Mr. John Wesley, at his Preaching
House in Dublin, Ireland."
There was chivalry in this, — the real, genuine chivalry, of
a noble mind and generous heart. The Swiss mountaineer
was not the man to see a friend bullied without rushing to his
rescue.
Wesley was not without sympathy. A few days later, his
faithful friend, Vincent Perronet, the vicar of Shoreham, who
was also of Swiss extraction, wTote to him as follows.
" Shoreham, July 9, 1771.
"My very dear Brother, — I am truly concerned, that so laborious
a servant of Christ should be attacked in so violent a manner. Insulted
by some, without the least decency, or regard to common decorum ; and
threatened by others with a synodical sentence.
" Had I been honoured with an invitation from a great personage, for
whom I have a very high esteem, I should have told her ladyship, that I
have no greater veneration for synods than the most excellent Bishop
Nazianzen had formerly, whose great learning and Christian virtues could
not screen him from the usual violence of those assemblies, and who
therefore desired to see no more of them.
" However, with regard to the merit of good works, I should frankly
have declared my abhorrence of the very sound of the word ; since I could
not conceive how an unprofitable servant could merit anything from a
holy God. But then, on the other hand, I should have added, that who-
ever should speak contemptuously of the diligent exercise of good works,
as if they derogated from the honour of Christ, I should tell such a
divine, that, whether he found his divinity either in Luther, or Calvin, or
the Synod of Dort, it was no divinity of the gospel of Christ ; since
Age 68
Calviniaii Controversy, 97
Christ came to purify unto Himself a peculiar people, zealous of good 1771
works. And as the Holy Spirit has assured us, over and over, that ' we
shall be judged according to our works,' it is, therefore, no wonder that
St. Paul should pray that his converts might be 'established in every good
word and work.' Besides, I might have observed that the zealot who
decries good works was acting a most ridiculous part with regard to faith ;
for if his faith did not bring forth good works, his faith was good for
nothing.
" However, though such good works were the fruits of faith, and conse-
quently the fruit of the Spirit of Christ, and, for that reason, must be
acceptable to God, yet, I must have added, so far as they were our works,
so far they wanted the blood of Christ to wash away their defilements, and
to atone for their deficiencies ; and, therefore, even our best works can
have no merit in them.
" I should, then, have remonstrated to that worthy lady to the following
purpose, — that if one, who had laboured in the vineyard, I believed, full
as much as any person since the days of the apostles, was not thought
worthy of the mantle of love, for any mistake he might have made, yet
surely he had a right to expect, that notice would have been given him to
explain his meaning, before his judge pronounced sentence. This is a
privilege granted to every supposed' criminal in our courts of law, and
where this is denied that court is no better than a court of inquisition.
" But now, my dear brother, what effect such a letter might have had,
I pretend not to say. It would, at the least, have testified to that friend-
ship, which I have constantly had for you these twenty-five years. May
God direct us both, and may our worst enemies be all brought to Him !
You have my leave to make what use you please of this long letter.
" I am, my very dear brother, yours most affectionately,
" Vincent Perronet." ^
Just at this juncture, Wesley drew up and printed, at
Dublin, under date "July 10, 1771," a clear and logical ex-
position of the doctrines set forth in the minutes, which
he doubtless circulated among his preachers and friends.
At the top of the first page of one of the copies, he
requested Miss Bishop, of Bath, not to " show it before
conference," adding, " if the Calvinists do not, or will not
understand me, I understand myself ; and I do not contradict
anything I have written these thirty years. Poor Mr, Shirley's
triumph will be short." ^
Wesley's views were the same as Perronet's. What were
Charles Wesley's, and what part was taken by him in this
' Methodist Magazine, 1797, p. 253.
2 Smith's History of Methodism, vol. i., p. 394.
VOL. III. n
qS Life and Times of Wesley.
1 77 1 momentous controversy ? The biographer of the Countess of
Age 68 Huntingdon would have his readers to beHeve, that Charles
disapproved of his brother's letter to her ladyship ; that he
would reprove him for it ; and, that he preferred peace above
all things.^ It might be so ; we have no means of gainsaying
it. It is doubtful whether he attended the conference in
Bristol ; in fact, almost certain that he did not. Hence the
following, addressed to him only three days before the com-
mencement of its sittings.
"KiNGSWooD, August 1, 1 771.
" Dear Brother, — I will not throw away Thomas Rankin on the
people of London. He shall go where they know the value of him.
" We cannot put out what we never put in. I do not use the word
'merit.' I never did, neither do I now, contend for the use of it. But I
ask you, or any other, a plain question: and do not cry, Murder; but
give me an answer. What is the difference between ' mereri^ and ' to
deserve ' .'' or between 'deserving,' and ' luerituni ' .-' I say still, I cannot
tell. Can you ? Can Mr. Shirley, or any man living.^ In asking this
question, I neither plead for merit, nor against it. I have nothing to do
with it. I have declared a thousand times, there is no goodness in man
till he is justified ; no merit, either before or after ; that is, taking the
word in its proper sense: for in a loose sense 'meritorious ' means no
more than ' rewaidable.'
"As to reprobation, seeing they have drawn the sword, I throw away
the scabbard. I send you a specimen. Let fifteen hundred of them be
printed as soon as you please.^
'' Nothing was ever yet expended out of the yearly collection, without
being immediately set down by the secretary. I never took a shilling froin
that fund yet.
" What you advise with regard to our behaviour toward our opposers
exactly agrees with my sentiments. I am full of business, as you may
suppose. So adieu !
"John Wesley." ^
On the evening before Wesley's conference assembled, two
letters were put into his hand, one written by Lady Hunting-
don, the other by the Rev. Walter Shirley. The purport of
her ladyship's letter was, that, having learned that the pro-
posed method of visiting his conference appeared to him and
to his friends " as an arbitrary way of proceeding, she and
her allies wished to inform him, that they intended no per-
' " Life and Times of Countess of Huntingdon," vol. ii., p. 237.
2 This was probably " The Consequence Proved," to be noticed shortly.
^ Wesley's Works, vol. xii., p. 127.
Calvinian Controversy. 99
sonal disrespect, but a degree of zeal against the principles 1771
established in the minutes, Avhich were repugnant to the Age 68
whole plan of man's salvation under the new covenant of
grace, and also to the clear meaning of the Established
Church, as well as to all other protestant churches, to whose
foundations the highest honour and respect are due." '
Shirley's letter apologises for that part of his circular which
seemed to assume, that he and his friends had a " civil right
to go in a body to Wesley's conference, and insist on a
formal recantation of the minutes." All he meant was, to
send Wesley a " respectful mxcssage importing their design, and
requesting him to appoint a day and hour for the conference
to receive them." The reason why he had inserted " the
offensive expression, ' insist upon a formal recantation,' "
(for which he now apologised,) was, because " it was supposed
by some, that, instead of giving satisfaction on the points in
question, such a forced construction would be put on the
meaning of the minutes, as might elude the intended opposi-
tion, and yet leave the doctrines therein contained entire and
unrepealed." Shirley concludes by stating, that the doctrines
of the minutes appear to him "evidently subversive of the
fundamentals of Christianity." ^
Remembering that Wesley was not under the slightest obli-
gation to either the Countess of Huntingdon, Mr. Shirley, or
any of their Calvinistic friends, he might, without any want
of courtesy, have treated with contempt a letter casting upon
him the slur of trickishness, and have declined to see its
author ; but, instead of that, he appointed Thursday, August
8, for the momentous interview. Accordingly, on that day,
Shirley, and two other ministers of the Countess of Hunting-
don's chapels, together with Messrs. Lloyd, Ireland, and
Winter, and two students (!) from Trevecca college, went to
Wesley's conference. Shirley's circular, summoning a synod,
had been sent to all his sympathisers, clerical and laical,
throughout the three kingdoms ; and the result was a grand
convocation of less than half a score, and even these included
two laics belonging to Bath and Bristol, and at least two
young men, still merely preparing for the ministry. The
' Shirley's " Narrative," p. 8. 2 ibj^ p_ iq^
loo Life and Times of Wesley.
1 77 1 thing was a ridiculous failure ; but not even on that account
A^TeS '^'^ Wesley refuse to see the self elected deputies. First of all,
Wesley engaged in prayer. Then Shirley desired to know if
the letters of himself and Lady Huntingdon had been read to
the conference. Being answered in the negative, he asked
leave to read them, which was granted. A lengthened con-
versation followed ; and then Shirley produced a written de-
claration which he wished the conference to sign. Wesley
read it, and made some alterations, which Shirley says were
"not very material," and then he and fifty-three of his
preachers appended to it their signatures.^ The declaration
thus signed was as follows : —
" Whereas the doctrinal points in the Minutes of a Conference, held in
London, August 7, 1770, have been understood to favour Justification by
Works : now the Rev. John Wesley, and others assembled in Conference,
do declare, that we had no such meaning ; and that we abhor the doc-
trine of Justification by Works as a most perilous and abominable
doctrine ; and as the said Minutes are not sufficiently guarded in the
way they are expressed, we hereby solemnly declare, in the sight of God,
that we have no trust or confidence but in the alone merits of our
Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, for Justification or Salvation either in life,
death or the day of judgment ; and though no one is a real Christian
believer, (and consequently cannot be saved) who doth not good works,
where there is time and opportunity, yet our works have no part in
meriting or purchasing our salvation^ from first to last, either in whole
or in part."
After the declaration had been agreed to, Shirley was re-
quested " to make some public acknowledgment, that he had
mistaken the meaning of the minutes." Shirley hesitated,
but at last consented, and wrote a certificate to that effect.
In the meantime, Wesley had received from Fletcher the
manuscript copy of his " Vindication of the Rev. Mr. Wesley's
Last Minutes : occasioned by a circular, printed letter, invit-
ing principal persons, both clergy and laity, as well of the
Dissenters as of the Established Church, who disapprove of
^Charles Wesley's name is not in the list: a further proof that,
strangely enough, he was not at this most important conference.
2 jhis ig ji-,e woxdi in Shirley's "Narrative" ; but in the Gospel Macrazine
for August, 1771, the word "justification" is used instead; and there
can be little doubt, that this was the reading of the original declara-
tion. The difference at first seems slight, but, in reality, it is of great
importance, as tlie readers of Fletcher's " Checks" will easily perceive.
Calviiiian Controversy. loi
those Minutes, to oppose them in a body, as a dreadful 1771
heresy : in Five Letters to the Hon. and Rev. Author of the a^^GS
circular letter."
Wesley at once gave the manuscript to William Pine to
print and publish. Shirley, hearing of this, waited upon
Wesley the day after he and his friends had been to con-
ference, and requested that the manuscript should not be
printed, urging as their reason, that Fletcher himself wished
for this, " if matters should end peaceably." Wesley, however,
persisted, and the work was published without delay, in a i2mo
pamphlet of 98 pages. Whilst the manuscript was being print-
ed, Wesley took the opportunity to reply to the letter of Lady
Huntingdon, which had been put into his hands the night before
his conference commenced. Nine days had elapsed since then,
and now Wesley, on August 14, addresses her ladyship in the
following unflinching terms, his letter also showing that the
publication of Fleitcher's " Vindication " was no after thought,
but was proceeding even while the conference was sitting.
''AlY DEAR Lady,— The principles established in the minutes I ap-
prehend to be no way contrary to that great truth, justification by faith, or
that consistent plan of doctrine, which was once delivered to the saints.
I believe whoever calmly considers Mr. Fletcher's Letters will be convinced
of this. I fear, therefore, that ' zeal against those principles ' is no less
than zeal against the truth, and against the honour of our Lord. The
preservation of His honour appears so sacred to me, and has done for
above these forty years, that I have counted, and do count, all things loss
in comparison of it. But till Mr. Fletcher's Letters are answered, I must
think everything spoken against these minutes is totally destructive of
His honour, and a palpable affront to Him ; both as our Prophet and
Priest, but more especially as the King of His people. Those Letters,
therefore, which could not be suppressed without betraying the honour of
our Lord, largely prove that the minutes lay no other foundation than
that which is laid in Scripture, and which I have been laying, and teaching
others to lay, for between thirty and forty years. Indeed, it would be
amazing that God should at this day prosper my labours as much if not
more than ever, by convincing as well as converting sinners, if I was
establishing another foundation, repugnant to the whole plan of man's
' salvation under the covenant of grace, as well as the clear meaning of our
Established Church, and all other />roti'sta/it churches.' This is a charge
indeed ! But I plead not guilty : and till it is proved upon me, I must
subscribe myself, my dear lady, your ladyship's affectionate but much
injured servant, "JOHN Wesley."'
^ Whitehead's Life of Wesley, \ol. ii., p. 349.
I02 Life and Times of Wesley.
1 77 1 Wesley had told his brother, that as " they had drawn the
Age 68 sword," he himself should " throw away the scabbard," and
now this was done. Shirley found the tables turned, and,
instead of attacking others, had to defend himself; and
hence, in September, he issued his " Narrative of the Principal
Circumstances 'relative to the Rev. Mr. Wesley's late Con-
ference, held in Bristol, August 6, 1771." 8vo, 24 pages.
Space prohibits any lengthened outline of Fletcher's "Vin-
dication." He gives (i) a general view of Wesley's doctrine ;
(2) an account of the commendable design of his minutes ;
(3) a vindication of their propositions. It is in this production,
that he furnishes his fearful description of the antinomianism
which was then so prevalent, and which really rendered some
utterance on the subject of good works a solemn necessity.
He also makes extracts from Shirley's published sermons,
teaching the very doctrines which Wesley's minutes teach ; to
which quotations Shirley's reply was, that " they were wrote
many years ago when he had more zeal than light," and
that he had " frequently wished that they were burnt." ^
Fletcher concludes thus : —
" O sir, have we not fightings enough without, to employ all our time
and strength ? Must we also declare war and promote fightings within ?
Must we catch at every opportunity to stab one another 1 What can be
more cutting to an old minister of Christ than to be traduced as a dreadful
heretic, in printed letters sent to the best men of the land, through all
England and Scotland, and signed by a person of your rank and piety ?
While he is gone to a neighbouring kingdom, to preach Jesus Christ,
to have his friends prejudiced, his foes elevated, and the fruit of his
extensive ministry at the point of being blasted ? Of the two greatest
and most useful ministers I ever knew, one is no more. The other,
after amazing labours, flies still, with unwearied diligence, through the
three kingdoms, calling sinners to repentance. Though oppressed with
the weight of near seventy years, and the cares of near thirty thousand
souls, he shames still, by his unabated zeal and immense labours, all the
young ministers in England, perhaps in Christendom. He has generally
blown the gospel trumpet, and rode twenty miles, before most of the
professors, who despise his labours, have left their downy pillows. As
he begins the day, the week, the year, so he concludes them, still intent
upon extensive services for the glory of the Redeemer, and the good of
souls. And shall we lightly lift up our pens, our tongues, our hands
against him ? No ; let them rather forget their cunning. If we will
' Shirley's " Narrative."
Calviniaii Controversy. lo
o
quarrel, can we find nobody to fall out with, but the minister upon whom 1 77 i
God puts the greatest honour ? "
Shirley's "Narrative" was published in September, in which
he gives great prominence to one of Fletcher's letters requesting
his "Vindication" to be suppressed. He furnishes an extract
from one addressed to Mr. Ireland, dated August 15, to the
following effect : " I feel for poor dear Mr. Shirley, whom I
have, (considering the present circumstances,) treated too
severely in my vindication of the minutes. My dear sir,
what must be done .'' I am ready to defray, by selling to my
last shirt, the expense of the printing of my Vindication, and
suppress it."
This was characteristic of Fletcher's large heartedness ; but
the extract from his letter was a garbled one, and rendered
it necessary that he should again enter the field of battle,
and defend himself as well as others. This was done at
once, and, before the year was ended, another production
of his facile pen was published, namely, " A Second Check
to Antinomianism: occasioned by a late narrative, in three
letters, to the Hon. and Rev. Author. By the Vindicator
of the Rev. Mr. Wesley's Minutes." i2mo, 109 pages.
He tells Shirley, that, though it was perfectly true that he
had written to Mr. Ireland, requesting his letters to be sup-
pressed, he had also stated to the same gentleman, that " the
minutes w//j-/ be vindicated, — that Mr. Wesley owed this to the
Church, to the ' real protestants,' to all his societies, and to his
own aspersed character." He states : " I was going to preach
when I had the news of your happy accommodation, and was
no sooner out of church, than I wrote to beg my Vindication
might not appear in the dress in which I had put it. I did
not then, nor do I yet, repent having written upon the min-
utes ; but, as matters are now, I am very sorry I did not write
in a general manner, without taking notice of the circular
letter, and mentioning your dear name." ^ He adds, that when
he gave the manuscript to Wesley, he begged him to correct
it, and to expunge whatever might be "unkind or too sharp."
Wesley had assured him, that " he had expunged every tart
expression " ; and, if so, (for Fletcher had not yet seen it in a
Age 68
1 "
Second Check," ist Edit., p. 40.
I04 Life and Times of Wesley.
^ITi- printed form,) he was '' reconciled to its publication." Fletcher
Age~68 further adds, that he had just received a letter (September 1 1,
i77i)from Bristol, stating that when Thomas Olivers, who was
now acting as Wesley's editor, heard of Fletcher's wish to sup-
press his "Vindication," he had already announced to the Bristol
congregation, that the work was in the press, and would soon be
ready. " Besides," continues Fletcher, in reference to Thomas
Olivers being the only preacher who refused to sign the decla-
ration at the conference, — " Besides, Mr. Olivers would have
pleaded, with smartness, that he never approved of a patched
up peace, — that he bore his testimony against it at the time
it was made, — had a personal right to produce my arguments,
since both parties refused to hear his at the conference."
These facts are of great consequence, inasmuch as Shirley
magnifies Wesley's publication of Fletcher's Vindication into a
heinous fault ; and others after him have endeavoured to brand
Wesley's character, not only for perpetuating the war, but
for publishing Fletcher's manuscript contrary to Fletcher's
wish. This is utterly unjust. The war was begun, not by
Wesley, but by the Calvinists ; and surely the attacked was
not presumptuous, or wanton, in endeavouring to defend him-
self. It is true, that, in doing that, he uses the sword of his
friend Fletcher ; but what of that .'' The sword was given
him to use, on July 27, when on his return from Ireland ;
and, though Fletcher subsequently hesitated as to the pro-
priety of the step he had taken, it was not until the sword
was brandished, by Fletcher's manuscript being committed to
the press and actually announced for sale. Besides, Fletcher's
hesitancy had reference, not to the thing done, but to the
manner of its being done. A vindication he considered to be
imperatively required : but he was afraid that his own was too
personal. Shirley was aggrieved, because he pretends to have
thought that the signing of the declaration would have ended
the matter ; but Shirley conveniently forgets : (i) that he him-
self had blackened Wesley's character throughout the three
kingdoms ; (2) that Wesley and his preachers had conceded
nothing to their adversaries, except that the minutes of 1770
were " not sufficiently guarded in the way in which they are
expressed " ; (3) that, as Fletcher abundantly demonstrates,
there was a terrible necessity for an enforcement of the doc-
Calviniaii Controversy. 105
trine of the minutes at this momentous period, both the ^77^
pulpits and pews of churches being infected with the deadly Age 6S
antinomianism of the late Dr. Crisp ; and (4) that, after all,
the doctrine of the minutes was only one part of the contro-
versy which the Calvinists had raised, and that there were
other attacks on Wesley, made by men like Augustus Top-
lady, and the editor of the Gospel Magazine, which it was
impossible, and, in fact, would have been criminally disastrous,
to have passed without rebuke.
That Fletcher did not regret the publishing of his Vindi-
cation is evident from the alacrity he showed in the prepara-
tion and publishing of his " Second Check ; " the chief object
of which was to establish " the doctrine of justification by
works in the day of judgment"; and to reprove Walter
Shirley for insinuating, in his " Narrative," that this was a
doctrine which Wesley and his fifty-three itinerant preachers
had given up.
Shirley retired from the field of battle ; but others took up
the gauntlet. The Gospel Magazine, faithful to its character,
was as furious as ever. In its August number, it published a
review of the " Church of England vindicated from the Charge
of Absolute Predestination," declaring that Wesley was its
author's "dictator and employer." The work is pronounced
"a composition of low scurrility and illiberal abuse." The
writer is charged with having " horribly blasphemed, and
daringly given the lie to the God of truth, by asserting that
any justified soul may at last perish in hell." " Arminianism
is a hodgepodge of human systems, made up of grace and
works, so blended together as to destroy the true meaning of
both."
In the same number was published Cleon's poem on
" Wesley's apostasy from the genuine faith of the gospel, an
awful proof that evil men and seducers wax worse and worse."
One verse must serve as a specimen. After describing the
doctrine of Wesley's minutes, Cleon writes :
"In vain for worse may Wesley search the globe,
A viper hatched beneath the harlot's robe ;
Rome, in her glory, has no greater boast,
Than Wesley aims — to all conviction lost."
In the September number, " Simplex, from the neighbour-
io6 Life and Times of Wesley.
^771 hood of the Foundery," expresses his astonishment, that
Age 68 Shirley and his friends should have been satisfied with the
declaration, signed at conference, inasmuch as " it denies not
one tittle clearly asserted in the minutes." Wesley is credited
with possessing " the unfathomable policy of a dubious divine."
He is a " fox," who " has had sagacity enough to elude his
hunters ; " and " evidently shows that he never meant to
recant what he had declared in the minutes, when he signed
the declaration."
In a subsequent number, " Simplex " reappears, and tells
his readers that he is " sorry to see the name of a Christian
minister prefixed to such foul and futile productions as those
of Mr. Sellon. Mr. Fletcher's pen is more cleanly, but every
whit as unfair. He is like a madman flinging abroad fire-
brands, arrows, and death, amongst those who differ from him.
Master Thomas Olivers has shocked common decency in his
letter to Mr. Toplady. And Mr. Wesley must be more ex-
plicit than he has been accustomed to be, before he can give a
satisfactory answer to Simplex's querulous epistle." These
are moderate specimens of the tone and language of the
Gospel Magardne.
Another brace of antagonists must be mentioned, Richard
and Rowland Hill, the sons of Sir Rowland Hill, the former
born in 1732, and the latter in 1745. Richard had been
educated at Westminster, and had spent four or five years at
Magdalen college, Oxford. Rowland had been sent to Eton,
and then to Cambridge university. Both the brothers had
turned preachers, though, as yet, neither of them had been
ordained. They were young, proud, and irascible ; and, with
greater zeal than prudence, entered into the Calvinian conflict.
Richard Hill published^ a sixpenny pamphlet, 8vo, of 31
pages, entitled "A Conversation between Richard Hill, Esq.,
the Rev. Mr. Madan, and Father Walsh, superior of a convent
of English Benedictine monks at Paris, held at the said
convent, July 13, 177 1, relative to some doctrinal Minutes,
advanced by the Rev. Mr. John Wesley and others, at a con-
ference in London, August 7, 1770. To which are added some
Remarks by the Editor ; as also Mr. Wesley's own Declara-
' See Sir Richard Hill's Life, p. 191.
Calviniaii Controversy. 107
tion concerning his Minutes, versified by another Hand." A 1771
prodigiously long title of a supremely silly tract, ^vhose object A{;e 6S
is to show that Wesley's doctrine was a great deal worse than
popery ; in fact, that " popery is about midway between pro-
testantism and Mr. J. Wesley." We content ourselves with
Sir Richard's poetical version of Wesley's declaration :
" Whereas, the religion and fate of three nations
Depend on the' importance of our conversations ;
And as some objections are thrown in our way.
Our words have been construed to mean what they say ;
Be 't known from henceforth, to each friend and each brother,
Whene'er we say one thing, we mean quite afiother."
Sir Richard was not content with this. He issued a penny
i2mo tract of 12 pages, with the title, "An Answer to some
capital Errors contained in the Minutes," etc., which finishes
by reproducing the doggerel calumny just given, as though
it were far too precious to be entombed in the more costly
pamphlet with which he had enriched the Christian church.
His third publication, — by far the best, — was an octavo
pamphlet of 40 pages, entitled, " Five Letters to the Reverend
Mr. Fletcher, relative to his Vindication of the Minutes of the
Reverend Mr. John Wesley." Apart from its theology, of
which we say nothing, this was worthy of a scholar, a Christian,
and a gentleman. The spirit of the piece is most loving, and
the style unexceptionable.
The publications, on the other side, in addition to those of
Fletcher, were three in number. •
First, Wesley's tract of 12 pages, entitled, "The Conse-
quence Proved" ; without either the author's or the printer's
name. Its object is to substantiate his former assertion, that
the gist of Toplady's Zanchius is to teach that " one in twenty
(suppose) of mankind are elected, and nineteen in twenty are
reprobate : that the elect shall be saved, do what they will ;
and the reprobate shall be damned, do what they can."
Wesley says : " I have not leisure to consider the matter at
large. I can only make a few strictures, and leave the young
man (Toplady) to be farther corrected by one that is full his
match, Mr. Thomas Olivers."^
^ There was also pubhshed, at this period, a smartly written rebuke of
io8 Life and Times of Wesley.
1 7 71 To be handed over to Thomas Ohvers was one of the
Age~68 bitterest pills that Toplady had to swallow. Olivers was a man
of great intellectual power ; but he had the misfortune to com-
mence life as a Welsh mechanic of not the highest order. He
was left an orphan when only four years old, and had now
attained the age of forty-six. His publication, i2mo, 60 pages,
was entitled, " A Letter to the Reverend Mr. Toplady, occa-
sioned by his late Letter to the Reverend Mr. Wesley." In
invective and tart rebuke, Toplady met a match in the intrepid
and fiery Welshman who, on behalf of Wesley, undertook to
fight the furious predestinarian with the not too respectable
weapons of his own choosing. It certainly is difficult to decide
which is the more proficient in the use of strong language.
It was a fisticuff encounter between a pugilistic pair, whose
thumping blows may be considered of equal force.
The third publication, alluded to above^ was " The Church
of England Vindicated from the Charge of Predestination, as
it is stated and asserted by the Translator of Jerome Zanchius,
in his Letter to the Rev. Dr. Nowell ; together with some
Animadversions on his Translation of Zanchius, his Letter to
the Rev. Mr. John Wesley, and his Sermon on i Timothy i.io."
i2mo, 129 pages. The author was the redoubtable Walter
Sellon, who, for outspokenness, was only second to Toplady
and Olivers themselves. At the same time, however, Sellon's
book evinces great ability and research, and thoroughly demo-
lishes the unfounded theories of an opponent, whose pen was
guided by bigatry rather than by Christian discretion. The
castigation was severe, but it was merited. The lash of a
scorpion whip is far from pleasant ; but the man who uses it
has no reason to complain of another using it in self defence.
Toplady had a right to wince and writhe ; but, under the cir-
cumstances, he had no right to foam, as, in succeeding
chapters, we shall find he did.
Here, for the present, we shall leave this embittered con-
flict, and trace the steps of the illustrious man whose high
position seemed to engender the envy which led to the attack
Toplady, and a defence of Wesley, entitled, "A Letter to the Rev. Mr.
Augustus Toplady, written in great part by himself, relative to part of
his printed Letter to the Rev. Mr. John Wesley." 8vo, 21 pages.
MetJiodist Discipline in I'j'ji. 109
upon him ; but who, excepting a short skirmish now and then, 1771
pursued his high and holy mission with as much serenity as if Age68
the conflict had not existed.
He landed in Ireland on March 24, and re-embarked for
England on July 22nd following.
At Dublin, the society had been jangling for years, and, as a
consequence, had suffered loss. Though not expressly stated,
it is clear that the cause of their quarreling was a dispute
respecting the authority of the preachers and of the leaders
respectively. Wesley, as the fountain of Methodistic law,
now laid it down that classleaders had no authority to re-
strain the assistant, if they thought he acted improperly ; but
might mfldly speak to him, and then refer the matter to Wesley
to be decided. They had no " authority to hinder a person
from preaching, or to displace a particular leader, or to expel
a particular member, or to regulate the temporal and spiritual
affairs of the society, or to make any public collection, or to
receive the yearly subscription." All this was the work of the
assistant, with one exception, namely, that the temporal
affairs of the society were regulated by the society steward.
The power of a classleader simply consisted in authority to
meet his class, to receive their contributions, and to visit his
sick members ; and the power of all classleaders united was
" authority to show their classpapers to the assistant, and to
deliver the money they had received to the stewards, and to
bring in the names of the sick."
Rightly or wrongly, such was Methodist discipline in 1771.
" In the Methodist discipline," writes Wesley, " the wheels
regularly stand thus : the assistant, the preachers, the stewards,
the leaders, the people. But here the leaders, who are the
lowest wheel but one, were quite got out of their place. They
were got at the top of all, above the stewards, the preachers,
yea, and above the assistant himself. To this chiefly, I impute
the gradual decay of the work of God in Dublin." " Nothing,"
says he, at Londonderry, where two years before he had
organised a band of singers, which through the preacher's
neglect was now dispersed, "Nothing will stand in the Method-
ist plan unless the preacher has his heart and his hand in it.
Every preacher, therefore, should consider it is not his busi-
ness to mind this or that thing only, but ever3'thing."
no Life and Times of Wesley.
More than three months of Wesley's time were spent, not
in Dubhn, but in itinerating the Irish provinces. In many in-
stances, he was gladdened with the prosperity of the work of
God ; in others, as Dubhn, Athlone, Tullamore, Waterford,
Cork, and Augher, the aspect of things was far from pro-
mising.
While on this lengthened journey, Wesley made the follow-
ing entry in his journal:' " 1771. June 28 — This day I
entered the sixty-ninth year of my age. I am still a wonder
to myself. My voice and strength are the same as at nine-
and-twenty. This also hath God Avrought."
Wesley remained in Ireland until he was obliged to leave in
order to meet his conference at Bristol. Much space has
been already occupied with an account of its important pro-
ceedings; but it may be added that, notwithstanding the
Calvinian disturbances, there was reported an increase of
1934 members. Among others, Joseph Benson was received
on trial as an itinerant preacher ; and Francis Asbury and
Richard Wright were sent as a reinforcement to America.
Nearly ;;^I700 were contributed to extinguish the chapel
debts ; and, to accomplish the thing at once, it was recom-
mended that, upon an average, every Methodist, in the three
kingdoms, should give, for one year, a penny a week. " If
this is done," says Wesley, " it will both pay our whole debt,
and supply all contingencies."
No sooner was the conference over than Wesley set out for
Wales, where he laboured nearly the next three weeks. One
of the Sundays was spent in Pembroke, where he preached in
two of the churches. He writes : "Many of the congregation
were gay, genteel people ; so I spake on the first elements of
the gospel. But I was still out of their depth. Oh how
hard it is to be shallow enough for a polite audience ! "
Returning to Bristol on August 31, he employed the next
month in visiting the societies surrounding that city. Twelve
months before, he had rejoiced over an apparently great
religious revival in Kingswood school ; but now, says he, " it
is gone ! It is lost ! It is vanished away ! There is scarce
any trace of it remaining ! Then we must begin again ; and,
in due time, we shall reap if we faint not."
Just at this period, Dr. William Cadogan's book on the
Female PrcacJiinc^. 1 1 1
gout and all chronic diseases was attracting great atten- 177 1
tion. Dr. Johnson called it " a good book in general, but a A'^8
foolish one in particulars." Wesley read the book, and agrees
with Cadogan, that " very few of the chronic distempers are
properly hereditary ; and that most of them spring either
from indolence, or intemperance, or irregular passions. But,"
he adds, and here he comes in conflict with modern teetotallers,
"but why should Dr. Cadogan condemn wine toto gencre,
which is one of the noblest cordials in nature .-' Yet stranger,
why should he condemn bread.'' Great whims belong to
great men ! "
After an absence of seven months, Wesley got back to
London on Saturday, October 5 ; and, on the Monday follow-
ing, set out on his usual tour through the counties of Bedford
and Northampton. This occupied a week, as did a similar
visit to the societies in Oxfordshire. For many years, Wesley
was accustomed to spend the last two or three months in each
year in weekly journeys from London as a pastoral centre.
The Bedfordshire and Northamptonshire journey was one ;
the Oxfordshire another ; Chatham and Sheerness a third ;
Staplehurst, Rye, Winchelsea, and other places a fourth ; and
Norfolk a fifth, which generally occupied a longer time.
Wesley concludes the year with this entry : " December 30
— At my brother's request, I sat again for my picture. This
melancholy employment always reminds me of that natural
reflection, — •
' Behold, what frailty we in man may see !
His shadow is less given to change than he.'"
Little more remains to be related respecting the year 1771,
except the points following.
It is a curious fact, that, in the year when Fletcher began
to render Wesley important service by the publication of his
" Checks," Fletcher's future wife, Miss Bosanquet, applied to
Wesley for advice on the subject of female preaching. Our
space prevents the possibility of discussing such a topic at
the length which it deserves ; but Wesley's letter, hitherto
unpublished, will be acceptable, as showing that, however
much importance he was disposed to attach to church order,
he was not the man to make all things bend to it.
112 Life and Times of Wesley.
1771 "Londonderry, June 13, 1771.
A"^68 " ^^ DEAR Sister, — I think the strength of the cause rests there, — on
your having an extraordinajy call. So, I am persuaded, has every one of
our lay preachers ; otherwise, I could not countenance his preaching at
all. It is plain to me, that the Avhole work of God termed Methodism is
an extraordinary dispensation of His providence. Therefore, I do not
wonder if several things occur therein, which do not fall under the
ordinary rules of discipline. St. Paul's ordinary rule was, ' I permit not
a woman to speak in the congregation.' Yet, in extraordinary cases,
he made a few exceptions; at Corinth in particular.
" I am, my dear sister, your affectionate brother,
"John Wesley,"^
In 1 77 1, Wesley began a revision and republication of all
the works which he had published during the last five-and-
thirty years, with the exception of his Notes on the Old and
New Testament, his "Christian Library," his "Natural Philo-
sophy," and his books for Kingswood school. It was during
this year that he issued a careful reprint of the four volumes
of sermons published in 1746, 48, 50, and 60, with the addition
of ten sermons, most of which had been published separately.
Besides these, he published five i2mo volumes of his
collected works, embracing the sermons just mentioned ; and
making together about 1800 printed pages, in which he not
only corrected the errors of the press, but his own mistakes,
and did, what has not been done in any subsequent edition of
his works, — placed an asterisk before the passages and para-
graphs which he judged were most worthy of the reader's
notice.
He likewise published the fourteenth " Extract " from his
journal, extending from May 27, 1765, to May 5, 1768.
i2mo, 128 pages.^
1 Manuscript letter.
^ As a curiosity, and as tending to show that, in this season of excitement,
all men were not Wesley's enemies, we give an extract from a review of this
section of Wesley's Journal, published in Lloyds Evening Post, for January
20, 1772 : — " In this interval, between May 27, 1765, and May 5, 1768, this
zealous and truly laborious missionary of the Methodists, who seems to co'n-
sider the three kingdoms as his parochial cure, twice traverses the greater
part of Ireland and Scotland, from Londonderry to Cork, from Aberdeen to
Dumfries, visiting and confirming the churches, besides making a progress,
chiefly on horseback (in many places more than once), through great
part of Wales, and almost all the counties in England, from Newcastle to
Southampton, from Dover to Penzance. Those who expect to find in
this Journal only the peculiar tenets of Methodism will be agreeably dis-
JVcslcys Piiblicaiions, in lyji. 1 1
J
His only other publications were his " Consequence Proved," 1771
and his " Defence " of his minutes, already mentioned ; and a~6S
finally, " A Letter to the Reverend Mr. F"leury," of Water-
ford, in Ireland. Mr. Fleury was a young parson, who, both
in 1769, and now again in 177 1, had taken the opportunity of
Wesley's visits to Waterford to preach against him. Wesley
writes: "1771, May 28 — At eleven, and again in the after-
noon, I went to the cathedral, where a young gentleman most
valiantly encountered the ' grievous wolves,' as he termed
the Methodists. I never heard a man strike more wide of
the mark. However, the shallow discourse did good ; for it
sent abundance of people, rich and poor, to hear and judge
for themselves." The " young gentleman's " two sermons,
which were published, were made up of the stale objections
and invectives that had been used, by his superiors and
seniors, times without number. Wesley's letter is a charac-
teristic reply to them.
appointed, as they are intermixed with such occasional reflections on men
and manners, on polite literature, and even on polite places, as prove
that the writer is endued with a taste well cultivated laoth by reading
and observation ; and above all with such a benevolence and sweetness
of temper, such an enlarged, liberal, and truly protestant way of
thinking towards those who differ from him, as clearly show that Ins heart,
at least, is right, and justly entitle him to that candour and forbearance,
which, for the honour of our common religion, we are glad to find he now
generally receives."
VOL. II r.
1772.
^772 TT LESLEY'S first journey from London, in 1772, was on
Age 69 VV the 16th of January, when he came to Luton, and
preached in the parish church. The friendly clergyman, who
gave him this permission, was the Rev. Mr. Copleston, whose
son afterwards became a Methodist local preacher, and Avas
driven from Luton by the iron hand of persecution, and then,
after preaching for a while at St. Albans, introduced Method-
ism into Leighton Buzzard, where he died, in 1835, at the age
of seventy, having been an earnest Methodist more than fifty
years.^
In a visit to Dorking, Wesley read Sterne's " Sentimental
Journey," and writes, " ScntiDicntal ! What is that.** It is not
English ; he might as well say continental. It is not sense.
It conveys no determinate idea ; yet one fool makes many,
and this nonsensical word (who would believe it ?) is become
a fashionable one ! However, the book agrees full well with
the title ; for one is as queer as the other. For oddity,
uncouthness, and unlikeness to all the world beside, I suppose
the writer is without a rival." This was a bold criticism on
Laurence Sterne, and his recently published book, which was
now immensely popular. On his return from Dorking, on
February 12, Wesley writes: "I read a very different book,
published by an honest quaker, on that execrable sum of all
villanies, commonly called the slave trade. I read of nothing
like it in the heathen world, whether ancient or modern;
and it infinitely exceeds, in every instance of barbarity, what-
ever Christian slaves suffer in Mahommedan countries."
This is a remarkable utterance. It was in this very year
that Granville Sharpe, the first of the English antislavery
advocates, began to take up the subject ; and it was not until
fifteen years after this, that the " Society for the Suppression
of the Slave Trade " was founded, of which, besides Sharpe,
"^ Methodist Magazine, \Z'},^,'^.%o\.
IVeslcy, oil Slavery. ■ 115
two of the chief members were Thomas Clarkson, a young 1772
graduate of Cambridge, and WilHam Wilberforce, who was Age 69
then ]\I.P. for the county of York. The book which Wesley
read was probably written by Anthony Benezet, a French
protestant, who, after being educated in England, became a
quaker in Philadelphia; and, in 1762, joublished the work
which first attracted the attention of this country ' to the in-
human traffic, which Wesley so justly designates " that exe-
crable sum of all villanies." Let it be noted that, besides all
his other honours, John Wesley, the poor, persecuted Method-
ist, was one of the first advocates on behalf of the enthralled
African that England had, and that, sixty years before slavery
was abolished in the dominions of Great Britain, he denounced
the thing in the strongest terms it was possible to employ.
Before we accompany Wesley on his long northern tour,
three other facts, belonging to this period,^ may be briefly
mentioned.
Ten years ago, Thomas Maxfield had dishonourably for-
saken his old friend, and had set up a rival church in the
neighbourhood of ]\Ioorfields. For some reason, he now seemed
to desire a reunion. Wesley was not the man to repel an
overture even from one whose behaviour had been ungrateful
and treacherous. He met Maxfield; but writes: "He only
seemed to desire a reunion ; for when we explained upon the
head, I found he meant just nothing."
Wesley was now close upon the age of threescore years and
ten. His life had been a scene of unparalleled activity ; and,
though still possessed of amazing vigour, he had not the energy
he had been wont to hav^e. His friends in London saw this ;
and hence the following entry in his journal. "1772. Feb.
21. — I met several of my friends, who had begun a subscription
to prevent my riding on horseback, which I cannot do quite
so well, since a hurt which I got some months ago. If they
continue it, well; if not, I shall have strength according to my
need."
Wesley's last act before leaving London was to open a new
chapel at Poplar. He writes : " 1772. Feb. 28 — I opened
the new preaching house in Poplar : one might say, conse-
* "Encyclopcedia Britannica," article "Slavery."
ii6 Life and Times of Wesley.
crated it ; for the English law (notwithstanding the vulgar
error) does not require, nay, does not allow, any other conse-
cration of churches than by performing public service therein."
Up to this period, the preaching at Poplar had been in
private dwellings, and in the workhouse, the mistress of which
was a Methodist. Now a wooden building was erected in
High Street, which was long called, out of derision, "the pantile
shop." One of the first members was Benjamin King, who
previous to this attended Gravel Lane chapel, Wapping, one of
the oldest Methodist meeting-houses in London, but which was
long since demolished for the making of the London Docks.
For many a year, Methodism at Poplar had a struggle for
existence, and often was Wesley importuned to give up the
preaching there ; but his constant answer was, " Does the old
woman" (Mrs. Clippendale) "who sits in the corner of the long
pew, still attend.'" "O yes," was the reply; "she never
misses." " Then for her sake keep going," was Wesley's
rejoinder. The venerable woman, who was thus the means of
perpetuating Methodist preaching at Poplar, was a native of
Swalwell, near Newcastle, and, at twelve years of age, re-
ceived her first society ticket, in 1745, from the hands of
Wesley, Four years later, she came to London, and con-
tinued a faithful Methodist for above seventy years.^
Strangely enough, it was now currently reported that
Wesley was about to leave England for America. The fol-
lowing refers to this.
"New York, April i, 1772.
"Reverend Sir, — By a letter from Mr. Lloyd, of London, we are
informed that you incline to visit America. Mr. Whiteficld's preaching
was of unspeakable use to many ; but he preached mostly in the seaport
towns, and the most populous parts of the provinces, where the gospel
was known, though not preached in power. In the back parts, which are
now grown populous, the inhabitants are still in a state of deplorable
ignorance. If some zealous and able teachers would engage heartily in
the work of their conversion, how soon might rivers spring forth in the
desert, and these owls and dragons of the wilderness give honour to God.
No doubt, many in England and elsewhere, who abound in wealth, would
contribute towards erecting schools to teach the children, and also towards
the support of preachers, if such an undertaking was properly set on foot.
But who is quahfied for this work ? I know none except yourself.
* Manuscript ; and Mcihodist Magazine, 1835, P- 494-
Age 6g
Correspondence with Mr. Sparrow. 117
" But, dear sir, what concerns mc more than all is the unhappy condition 1772
of our negroes, who are kept in worse than Egyptian bondage. The food
we eat, the clothes we wear, and all the superfluities we possess, are the
produce of their labours ; and what do they receive in return? Nothing
equivalent ; on the contrary, we keep from them the key of knowledge ;
so that their bodies and souls perish together in our service ! If, there-
fore, you are not too advanced in years, 1 say to you, in the name of God,
come over and help us ; in doing which you will greatly oblige many
thousands, and, among the rest, your friend and brother,
"Jonathan Bryan."'
Did Wesley seriously think of this .-* We arc not sure ; but
the following characteristic letter to Walter Sellon will be
read with interest.
"February i, 1772.
" Dear \Valter,^You do not understand your information right.
Observe, ' I am going to America to turn bishop.' You are to understand
it in sciisu composito. I am not to be a bishop till I am in America.
While I am in Europe, therefore, you have nothing to fear. But as soon
as ever you hear of my being landed in Philadelphia, it will be time for
your apprehensions to revive. It is true, some of our preachers would
not have me stay so long ; but I keep my old rule, Festina lente.
" I am, dear Walter, your affectionate brother,
"John Wesley."^
Previous to his leaving London, Wesley commenced a long
correspondence, which extended over the next two years, with
Samuel Sparrow, Esq., a gentleman in the neighbourhood of
Sheffield, who had published a volume, entitled "Family
Prayers and Moral Essays," a copy of which was presented
to Wesley by the author. The writer has before him the
correspondence that ensued ; and perhaps the following ex-
tracts, from some of Wesley's letters, will be acceptable.
"To the questions which you propose I answer: (i) I think that if a
hundred, or a hundred thousand, sincere, honest, humble, modest, self
diffident men were, with attention and care, to read the New Testa-
ment, uninfluenced by any but the Holy Spirit, nine in ten of them, at
least, if not every one, would discover that the Son of God was ' ador-
able,' and one God with the Father ; and would be immediately led to
' honour Him even as they honoured the Father.'
" (2) Give a fair, impartial reading to that account of mankind in their
present state, which is contained in the book on original sin. It is no
play of imagination, but plain, clear fact. We see it with our eyes,
^ Methodist Alagasine, 1785, p. 167,
2 Wesley's Works, vol. xiii., p. 43.
ii8 Life and Times of Wesley.
and hear it with our ears daily. Heathens, Turks, Jews, Christians of
every nation, are such men as are there described. Such are the tempers,
such the manners, of lords, gentlemen, clergymen in England, as well as
of tradesmen and the low vulgar. No man in his senses can deny it :
and none can account for it, but upon the supposition of original sin.
"On Scripture and common sense I build all my principles; and just
so far as it agrees with these, I regard human authority.
"There is too 'just ground for charging the preachers both at Black-
friars church, the chapel at the Lock,' and the Tabernacle, with grievous
want of charity ; for most of them flatly maintain, ' all who do not believe
as they believe, are in a state of damnation ;' all who do not believe the
absolute decree of election, which necessarily infers absolute reprobation.
My brother and I set out on two principles : (i) None go to heaven without
holiness of heart and life ; (2) Whoever follows after this, whatever his
opinions be, is my brother; and we have not swerved a hair's breadth
from either the one or the other to this day."
On the 1st of March Wesley set out on his northern visita-
tion, and did not return to London until seven months after-
wards. It was now that he preached his first sermon in the
town of Leek, where Thomas Hanby, eighteen years before,
had formed a society at the peril of his life. " Kill him, kill
him," bawled the mob, as they pelted him with showers of
stones ; but the young evangelist, then only in the twenty-
first year of his age, mercifully escaped ; and the rabble,
headed by a lawyer, had to content themselves with merely
burning him in effigy.^
Wesley writes : "March 27, 1772. — While I was dining at
Leek, some gentlemen of the town sent to desire I would give
them a sermon. As it seemed to be a providential call, I did
not think it right to refuse. A large congregation quickly
ran together, and were deeply attentive."
A society had recently been gathered at Nantwich, of which
Mr. Salmon, an eccentric Christian gentleman, and some of
his sisters, were members ; and hence Nantwich was now
added to the places which Wesley had to visit. This was.
probably the Mr. Salmon who was to have gone with the
Wesleys to Georgia, but who was forcibly detained in his
Cheshire home by his father and mother, who were distracted
at the thought of their son leaving them. Joseph Whittingham
' Messrs. Romaine and Madan.
* Methodist Magazine, \ 780, p. 546.
Methodis7n at Nantwich. 1 1 9
Salmon had a good heart, but muddy head. Soon after this, i77-
he began to preach,^ and, at the death of his wife, in 1785, Age 69
pubHshed a long rigmarole funeral sermon, 8vo, 39 pages,
which he preached in Barker Street chapel, Nantwich, and
which is strongly spiced with the mystical delusion into
which he had fallen. It is scarcely too much to say, that the
weak mind of this well meaning man henceforth lost its
balance, and that mystic pride ^nd cacoetJies scribendi were
the chief features that distinguished the close of a lengthened
but lustreless life. His wife, however, and several of the
Misses Salmon were intelligent and earnest Methodists, and
were among the earliest friends of Hester Ann Roe, after-
wards Mrs. Rogers.^
There was another gentleman of note, near Nantwich, Sir
Thomas Broughton, of Doddington Hall, who had a chapel in
his park, and who, though not a Methodist, himself read or
preached to the congregation the whole of Wesley's sermons
from first to last.^ Salmon tells us, that this " reverend
baronet," as he calls him, at the death of his lady, called
together his eleven children and his thirty servants, at eleven
o'clock at night, and then, as they stood round the corpse,
amid midnight silence and the dim radiance of lighted tapers,
engaged in prayer, previous to the interment, the whole form-
ing a scene not easily forgotten.
These were Methodism's auxiliaries in the town of Nant-
wich ; but, for long years, it had to struggle with adversity, its
members worshipping in an old hired baptist chapel until
the year 1808, when, chiefly through the help of Mr. Within-
shaw, a new chapel was erected, and Nantwich was made a
circuit town.*
On the 5th of April, Wesley reached Bolton and Manchester.
In reference to the former town he writes : " How wonderfully
has God wrought in this place ! John Bennet, some years
ago, reduced this society from sevenscore to twelve ; and
they are now risen to a hundred and seventy." At Man-
chester, Wesley "drank tea at Am. O. ;" probably Adam
'^Methodist Magazine, 1788, p. 217.
2 Mrs. Rogers' manuscript journal. ^ Manuscript.
* Methodist Magazin:, 1842, p. -28.
I20 i-^f^ cind Times of Wesley.
^772 Oldham's, and remarks : " But how was I shocked ! The
Age 69 children that used to cling about me, and drink in every word,
had been at a boarding school. There they had unlearned
all religion, and even seriousness ; and had learned pride,
vanity, affectation, and whatever could guard them against the
knowledge and love of God. Methodist parents, who would
send your girls headlong to hell, send them to a fashionable
boarding school !"
Proceeding by way of Whitehaven and Carlisle, Wesley
came to Glasgow on April 18, and, a week later, arrived at
Perth, where he was the provost's guest, and received an
honour which fell to him only once again in his long lifetime.
He shall tell his own story.
"1772. April 28, Tuesday. We walked through the Duke of Athol's
gardens, in which was one thing I never saw before, — a summerhouse in
the middle of a greenhouse, by means of which one might, in the depth
of winter, enjoy the warmth of May, and sit surrounded with greens and
flowers on every side.
" In the evening I preached once more at Perth, to a large and serious
congregation. Afterwards they did me an honour I never thought of, —
presented me with the freedom of the city. The diploma ran thus : —
" ' Magistratmun illttstris ordo et honorandus senatorum ccetits inclytcE
civitatis Pci'thensis, in dcbiti amoris et affectuiiin tesseram erga Johatinem
Wesley^ iinimiiiitatihts prcpfatce civitatis, socictatis etiani et fratcrtiitatis
(cdiliticE privilcgiis donaruiit. Aprilis die 28, anno Sal. 1772.'
" I question whether any diploma from the city of London be more
pompous, or expressed in better Latin."
Eight days afterwards, the magistrates of Arbroath con-
ferred on Wesley a similar mark of their' respect.
While in this part of Scotland, Wesley read two Scotch
authors, upon whom his criticisms are too racy to be omitted.
He writes :
" In my way to Perth, I read over the first volume of Dr. Robertson's
* History of Charles the Fifth.' I know not when I have been so dis-
appointed. It might as well be called the History of Alexander the Great.
Here is a quarto volume of eight or ten shillings' price, containing dry
verbose dissertations on feudal government, the substance of all which
might be comprised in half a sheet of paper ! But ' Charles the Fifth ! '
Where is Charles the Fifth ?
' Leave off thy reflections, and give us thy tale ! ' "
" May 5. I read over, in my journey to Arbroath, Dr. Beattie's in-
Wesley, oil David Hiliiic. i 2 1
genious ' Inquiry after Truth.' He is a writer quite equal to his subject, 1772
and far above the match of all the minute philosophers, David Hume in — ■
particular, the most insolent despiser of truth and virtue that ever appeared ^ "
in the world. And, yet, it seems some complain of this doctor's using
him with too great severity ! I cannot understand how that can be,
unless he treated him with rudeness (which he does not), since he is an
avowed enemy to God and man, and to all that is sacred and valuable on
earth."
On the 9th of I\Iay, Wesley reached Edinburgh, where his
state of health was made the subject of an important medical
examination. It has been already stated that, before he left
London, his friends there, perceivmg signs of age and debility,
had contributed to provide him a carriage in which to pursue
his extensive and laborious journeys. Since then, in less than
ten weeks, he had travelled, in his chaise and on horseback,
from London to Bristol, and thence to Birmingham, Notting-
ham, Macclesfield, Chester, Liverpool, Manchester, White-
haven, Carlisle, Glasgow, Aberdeen, and Edinburgh, preaching
there, and at a great number of intervening towns and
villages, sometimes as many as four sermons in a day. He
had had to encounter winter storms, to wade mid-leg deep in
snow, and to travel roads so execrably bad, that sometimes he
was literally bogged. Not unfrequently he preached in the
midst of piercing winds in the open air ; and yet, there is not
a single, entry in his journal indicative of failing health.
Never, in his life, was he more intent upon the prosecution
of his great work than now. Writing to his brother from
Congleton, and again from Perth, he says :
"I find almost all our preachers, in every circuit, have done with
Christian perfection. They say, they believe it ; but they never preach
it, or not once in a quarter. What is to be done ? Shall we let it drop,
or make a point of it? Oh what a thing it is to have ciiram aniniarum !
You and I are called to this ; to save souls from death ; to watch over
them as those that must give account ! If our office implied no more than
preaching a few times in a week, I could play with it ; so might you. But
how small a part of our duty (yours as well as mine) is this ! God says to
you, as well as me, 'Do all thou canst, be it more or less, to save the
souls for whom My Son has died.' Let this voice be ever sounding in our
ears ; then shall we give up our account with joy. Eia age, rinnpc moras!
I am ashamed of my indolence and inactivity. Your business, as well as
mine, is to save souls. When we took priests' orders we undertook to
make it our one business. I think every day lost, which is not (mainly at
least) employed in this thing. Sinn iotas in illo.
122 Life and Tiines of Wesley.
^Il'i- "I am glad you are to be at Bristol soon. To whom shall I leave my
A^i~6Q ^^'^'^^''^ ^"<^ papers ? I am quite at a loss. I think Mr. Fletcher is the
" best that occurs now. Adieu !"^
Wesley was too busy to think of being ill He was not
alarmed ; but his friends were. HencQ, the following ad-
dressed to Charles Wesley.
"Shoreham, April i8, 1772.
" My very dear Brother, — I doubt not, but we both join in con-
stant petitions, at the throne of grace, for the life and health of our dear
absent friend, thy brother. By all accounts, his valuable health is in a
precarious state; and unless God provides (as I doubt not but He will), for
His people, they will have abundant reason to mourn. May God give
thee a double portion of His Spirit, that thou mayest stand in the gap,
and prevent the flock being led by any who have not true gospel light
in the head, and great integrity in the heart ! My love to thy dear
brother ;the same attends thee and my dear sister, and all thy family.
The Divine blessing be with all of us !
" Thine, most affectionately,
" Vincent Perronet." ^
Probably it was the request of his friends, rather than his
own anxiety, which induced Wesley, at Edinburgh, to submit
to a medical examination.
At this period. Dr. James Hamilton was a young man of
about two-and-thirty, and was practising medicine in his
native town of Dunbar, where he also had joined the
Methodists. Afterwards he removed to Leeds, and then to
London, where he was elected physician to the London
Dispensary, and rose to eminence in the medical profession.
He died in Finsbury Square, April 21, 1827, at the age of
eighty-seven, having been a Methodist upwards of sixty
years, and nearly as long a highly acceptable and useful local
preacher.
Dr. Alexander Monro was a few years older. Such was
his ability, that, at the age of twenty-two, he was appointed
professor of anatomy and surgery to the University of Edin-
burgh ; and is said, by the excellence of his lectures, to have
materially assisted in raising it to the highest celebrity as a
school of medicine.
Dr. James Gregory was now a young man in his twentieth
^ Wesley's Works, vol. xii., p. 129.
"^ Methodist Magazine, 1785, p. 169.
Medical Examination. 123
year; but, two years later, was appointed professor of the i77-
theory of physic, and rose to such eminence in his profession Age 69
as to draw pupils from all parts of the world.
These were the three physicians who attended Wesley. He
writes : "May 18 — Dr. Hamilton brought with him Dr. Monro
and Dr. Gregory. They satisfied me what my disorder was ;
and told me there was but one method of cure. Perhaps but
one natural one ; but I think God has more than one method
of healing either the soul or the body."
Wesley's disease was hydrocele.' A few months later, he
writes : " I am almost a disabled soldier. I am forbid to ride,
and am obliged to travel mostly in a carriage." ^
That Wesley's health was seriously affected there cannot be
doubt. Lloyd's Evening Post, for June 15, remarks: "By
accounts from Scotland, we learn that the Rev. Mr. Wesley
has had a dangerous fit of illness, in which he was attended
by three of the most eminent of the faculty there, who gave
him over; but some younger gentlemen in practice have been
luckily assistant to him, and they have now hopes that he
may continue his ministry many years longer."
Wesley doubtless was amused with this. During his ten
days' stay in Edinburgh, he preached at least about half-a-
dozen times ; and, on the very day when the medical men
met, he opened a new chapel at Leith, and two days later
started for Newcastle, preaching on his way at Dunbar,
Alnwick, and Morpeth.
Reaching Newcastle on May 25, he spent the remainder of
the week in the town and neighbourhood, preaching, on the
Sunday, three times out of doors, to immense and attentive
congregations.
The first four days in the month of June were occupied with
what he calls "a little tour through the dales" ; and, in this
brief period, besides travelling scores of miles over " the
horrid mountains," and examining societies, he preached at
least eight sermons. He writes: "from the top of an enor-
mous mountain we had a view of Weardale. It is a lovely
prospect. The green, gently rising meadows and fields, on
both sides of the little river, clear as crystal, were sprinkled
* Wesley's Works, vol. iii., p. 449. ^ Ibid. vol. xii., p. 369.
1 24 Life and Times of Wesley.
1772 over with innumerable little houses ; three in four of which, if
A?e 69 not nine in ten, are sprung up since the Methodists came
hither. Since that time, the beasts are turned into men, and
the wilderness into a fruitful field."
Six months before this, Weardale had been blessed with a
remarkable religious revival, the penitent prayer-meetings
often continuing till ten or eleven o'clock at night, and some-
times till four in the morning. On one occasion, four young
men, seeking pardon, remained on their knees for five hours
together. Among others who found mercy was an old woman,
. who, twenty-three years before, was the first in Weardale to
receive the Methodists into her house. Sometimes as many
as half-a-dozen "lay on the ground together, roaring for the
disquietude of their hearts." Chiefly through the instru-
mentality of Jane Salkeld, a schoolmistress, thirty children
were converted, including Phoebe Featherstone, Hannah Wat-
son, and others whom Wesley mentions.
Not only does Wesley give, at great length, the details of
this revival ; but he compares it with that at Everton thirteen
years before. His remarks are worth quoting.
" It resembled the work at Everton in many respects, but not in all.
"It resembled tliat work — (i) In its unexpected beginning; no such
work had ever been seen before either at Everton or in Weardale. (2) In the
swiftness of its progress, I mean in tlie persons affected ; many of whom
were in one day, or even two or tliree hours, both convinced of sin (with-
out any previous awakening), and converted to God. (3) In the number
of persons both convinced and converted, which was greater in a few
months than it had been in Weardale from the first preaching there, or in
Everton for a century. (4) In the outward symptoms which have attended
it : in both, the sudden and violent emotions of mind affected the whole
bodily frame ; insomuch that many trembled exceedingly, many fell to
the ground, many were violently convulsed, and many seemed to be in the
agonies of death. (5) In most of the instruments whom God employed:
these were plain, artless men, simple of heart, but without any remarkable
gifts ; men who, almost literally, knew ' nothing save Jesus Christ and
Him crucified.'
" In these respects, the work of God in Weardale nearly resembled that
at Everton; but, in other respects, they were widely different. For — (i) That
was the first work of God, of the kind, which had ever been in those parts
in the memory of man ; this was only a revival of a work, which had con-
tinued for many years. Now these circumstances are common at the
dawn of a work, but afterwards very uncommon. I do not remember to
have seen the like anywhere in the three kingdoms, unless at the beginning
Revival in IVeardale. 1 2 5
of a work. (2) Although the former work was swift, the latter was far 1772
swiften In general, persons were both awakened and justified in a far — -
shorter time. (3) A far greater number were converted to God in Wear- '^^ '
dale than about Ev'erton, although the number of hearers about Everton
was abundantly greater than in Weardale. (4) Although the outward
symptoms were the same, yet in- Weardale there were none of the dreams,
visions, and revelations which abounded at Everton ; and which, though
at first they undoubtedly were from God, yet were afterwards fatally
counterfeited by the devil. (5) There was a great difference in the instru-
ments whom God employed. Not one of those in or near Everton had any
experience in the guiding of souls. None of them were more than ' babes
in Christ,' if any of them so much. Whereas, in Weardale, not only the
three preachers were, I believe, renewed in love, but most of the leaders
were deeply experienced in the work of God. Hence, (6) we may easily
account for the grand difference, namely, that the one work was so
shallow, and the other so deep. Many children here have had far deeper
experience, and more constant fellowship with God, than the oldest man
or woman at Everton which I have seen or heard of."
Such were Wesley's moralisini^s on the Weardale revival, in
1772, in which less than a hundred people were converted, and
concerning which he says : " upon the whole, we may affirm,
such a work of God as this has not been seen before in the
three kingdoms." If this was so, who will say that the former
times were better than these .-• How many thousands of aged
Methodists can easily call to mind far more remarkable revivals
of the work of God than even that in Weardale ! And,
further, how was it that, at Wesley's visit two years after, the
results of this revival were almost reduced to nothing, except
that, in consequence of the backslidings, "the preachers were
discouraged ; and jealousies, heart burnings, and evil surmis-
ings, were multiplied more and more " ?
Wesley returned from Weardale to Newcastle on the 5th
of June, and here, and in the immediate neighbourhood, he
spent the next ten days. In the Newcastle society, there were
fewer members than he had found two years before. " This,"
says he, " I can impute to nothing but the want of visiting
from house to house ; without which the people will hardly
increase, either in number or grace." This was a sharp thrust
at some of the most distinguished preachers of the day,
namely, Peter Jaco, Joseph Cownley, Thomas Hanby, Matthew
Lowes, Thomas Tennant, William Thompson, and Thomas
Simpson, all of them appointed to Newcastle at this period.
126 Life ct-iid Times of Wesley.
1772 On June 15, Wesley left Newcastle, and spent the next
Age 69 week in preaching at Durham, Stockton, Yarm, Thirsk,
Osmotherley, Hutton Rudby, Stokesley, Castleton, Whitby,
Robinhood's Bay, and Scarborough. This was pretty well,
for a man afflicted as Wesley was, and at the age of seventy.
Eighteen months before this, his termagant wife had abruptly
left him, and gone to her house at Newcastle. Now that his
health was so endangered, she was returning with him,
whether to his comfort or otherwise we are not informed ;
but, at all events, she had in Wesley's chaise the undeserved
luxury of a summer's ride through the most beautiful scenes
of Yorkshire.i
From Scarborough he proceeded to Bridlington, Driffield,
Beverley, Hull, York, Tadcaster, Pateley Bridge, Otley, Hep-
tonstall, Kelghley, Haworth, Bingley, Bradford, Halifax,
Huddersfield, IMorley, Birstal, Doncaster, Sheffield, Epworth,
Brigg, Horncastle, Louth, Grimsby, Pontefract, Horbury,
Wakefield, and other places, preaching at all of them, until,
on August 2, he got to Leeds, for the purpose of holding
his annual conference. This was enormous labour for any
man, and especially for an old man, suffering from a severe and
painful malady. To all this must be added, cottage accom-
modation, hard beds, and often hard living ; and, though
brutal persecution had considerably abated, Wesley was not
entirely exempt from this ; for, at Halifax, on July 8, a ruffian
struck him most violently on the face, when, with tears starting
from his eyes, the venerable saint acted upon the precept of
his Master : " Whosoever shall smite thee on the right cheek,
turn to him the other also"; a display of heroic meekness
which cowed the brutal coward, and made him slink away into
the ignoble crowd. ^ Yet, in the midst of all this, there is not
a single syllable, in his journal, concerning either persecution,
hardship, debility, or disease.
He writes : " On Tuesday, August 4, our conference began.
Generally, during the time of conference, as I was talking from
morning to night, I had used to desire one of our brethren to
preach in the morning ; but, having many things to say, I
^" Memoir of Mrs. Mortimer," p. 37; and Wesley's Works, vol. iii., p. 449.
-" Methodism in Halifax," p. 121.
Cotifei'ence of i'j'j2. 127
resolved, with God's help, to preach mornings as well 1772
as evenings. And I found no difference at all ; I was no A"e~69
more tired than with my usual labour ; that is, no more
than if I had been sitting still in my study from morning to
night."
One of Wesley's sermons, preached to an immense congre-
gation, in a field behind the chapel, was from Isaiah Ixvi. 8, 9 :
" Who hath heard such a thing 'i " etc. ; in which he dwelt
upon the great work which God had wrought among the
Methodists, discoursing on its rapidity, depth, extensiveness,
and its growing character. " It was," says good old Thomas
Rutherford, " marrow and fatness to my soul." *
Wesley, in needful cases, was a brave defender of his
preachers. The following, addressed to Mr. Alexander Clark,
of Dublin, and written at this period, will be read with
interest.
"Sheffield, August 10, 1772.
" My DEAR Brother, — Now the hurry of conference is over, I get a
little time to write. When I chose you to be steward in Dublin, you both
loved and esteemed your preachers ; but I find you have now drunk in the
whole spirit of Pat. Geoghegaru O beware ! You are exceedingly
deceived. By this time, I should be some judge of man; and if I am, all
England and Ireland cannot afford such a body of men, number for
number, for sense and true experience, both of men and things, as the body
of Methodist preachers. Our leaders in London, Bristol, and Dublin are
by no means weak men. I would not be ashamed to compare them with
a like number of tradesmen in every part of the three kingdoms. But I
assure you, they are no more than children compared to the preachers
in conference, as you would be thoroughly convinced, could you but have
the opportunity of spending one day among them. Mr. Jaco will make a
fair trial whether he can supply Dublin alone ; if he cannot, he shall have
another to help, for he must not kill himself to save charges. But I dare
not stint him to £p.o a year. He will waste nothing ; but he must want
nothing. You will make his stay among you, in every respect, as com-
fortable as you can,
" 1 am your aflectionatc brother,
"John Wesley."^
No sooner was the conference ended, than Wesley again
started on his itinerancy of mercy. On his way to Burslem,
his chaise broke down ; but, notwithstanding his disease,
^ Methodist Magazine, 1808, p. 482.
♦ Irish Evangelist, April, 1 S64.
128 Lifo cind Times of Wesley.
1772 rather than disappoint the people, he mounted a horse and
A<^9 rode two-and-twenty miles, arriving just in time for preach-
ing.
On reaching Trevecca, on August 14, he met his old friend,
Howel Harris, who, while almost all others of his class had
imbibed the most bitter feelings, still remained faithful. " I
have borne," said the honest Welshman, " with these pert,
ignorant young men, vulgarly called students, till I cannot, in
conscience, bear any longer. They preach barefaced repro-
bation, and so broad antinomianism, that I have been con-
strained to oppose them to the face, even in the public
congregation." This was no great compliment to the students
of the Countess of Huntingdon, especially as coming from a
Calvinist. Wesley, almost as an apology, adds to this : " It is
no wonder that they should preach thus. Wliat better can be
expected from raw lads, of little understanding, little learning,
and no experience .''"
It is pleasing to add, that Howel Harris was not the only
one of Whitefield's friends who still stood true to Wesley,
though differing from his views. Hence the following, addressed
to him by Cornelius Winter,
" Brecon, August 10, 1772.
" Reverend and dear Sir,— Do you ask what I have been about 'i I
answer, preaching Christ wherever a door has been opened to me. Some-
times I have cast a handful of seed on your ground ; and should it ever
come to a harvest you are welcome to it : it will become Jesus's property
at last. What melancholy consequences from late productions ! They
forbid me to be any longer an idle hearer or a careless reader. I have
been obliged, from conscience, to make a stand agamst dear Mr. Fletchers
groundless arguments and most bitter invectives.' Many things, he has
said, are a proper antidote applied wrong, and to improper objects, and
thereby become poison, whereas they might have been a healing medicine.
But I must say no more on this subject ; I am writing to one who will
give it little attention.
"Dr. Owen's 'Death of Death' has been my favourite study of late ;
and, in consequence of embracing the doctrine therein contained, I must
agree to disagree with Mr. Fletcher's thoughts, and dear Mr. Wesley's
fj'iendly pen. Excuse my frank acknowledgments, and give me leave to
differ and love. God bless you to your latest period, and make your last
1 Wesley justly appends a note to this : " Let the unbiased reader judge,
whether Mr. Fletcher has made use of groundless arguments or bitter
invectives."
Ceaseless Labours. 129
days your best ! So prays, reverend and dear sir, yours most respectfully 1772
and affcctionatclv, in our dear Lord Jesus, . '
" Cornelius Winter." > ^^^ "9
From Trevecca, Wesley proceeded to Bristol, and here,
and in the neighbourhood, he employed the next seven weeks.
In Bristol itself, he "visited the whole society from house to
house, taking them from west to east." He not unfrequently
preached in the open air, and strikingly remarks : " to this
day field preaching is a cross to me ; but I know my com-
mission, and see no other way of preaching the gospel to
every creature." The children at Kingswood, and at IMiss
Owen's school at Publow, were almost all converted. He
writes : " I suppose such a visitation of children has not been
known in England these hundred years !"^ "Publow is now
what Leytonstone was once. Here is a family indeed. Such
mistresses, and such a company of children, as I believe all
England cannot parallel !"
Leaving Bristol on October 5, and preaching on his way
at Shaftesbury, Salisbury, Winchester, and Portsmouth, he
came to London on October 10. He had been seven months
from home, if indeed he had a home ! and yet, after spending
only one day. in London, he again set out on his usual
preaching tour in the counties of Bedford and Northampton.
Returning to London, where he spent another day, he started
on his visitation in Oxfordshire. Returning again to London,
and again spending a single day, he went off, on October 26,
to Norfolk, where he employed a fortnight. Except making
a journey into Kent, and another to Hertfordshire, the re-
mainder of the year was passed in the metropolis.
Here he again began expounding, chiefly in the mornings,
" that compendium of all the Holy Scriptures, the first epistle
of St, John." Now, for the first time in his life, he saw the
chapel at Snowsfields full. Pie opened a new chapel at
Dorking, and another in the parish of Bromley, He visited
the sick ]\Iethodists in London, and " was surprised that they
were so few." And on December 3 1 he wrote : " Being
greatly embarrassed by the necessities of the poor, we spread
* Methodist Magazine, 1785, p. 336.
- Wesley's Works, vol. xiii., p. 357.
VOL. in. K
130 Life and Times of Wesley.
1772 all our wants before God in solemn prayer ; believing that He
AgTeg would sooner ' make windows in heaven ' than suffer His
truth to fail."
This reference to the poor requires further notice. The long
continued war, a succession of inferior harvests, and other
unfavourable events, had raised the price of provisions to such
an extent, that the distress of the nation had become alarming.
In the month of November, the court of common council of
London agreed to petition parliament to open the ports of the
kingdom for the free importation of all kinds of grain ; and
one of the members proposed that, in order to prevent the
unnecessary consumption of flour, the making of starch should
be prohibited. Long letters on the starved condition of the
country were published in the newspapers and magazines.
Some of them entered into elaborate calculations, showing
that, in London only, during the six winter months, twenty
thousand sheep and two thousand oxen were used in making
soup for taverns, and the tables of the great. When the
king opened parliament, on November 26, he referred in his
speech to the dearness of corn, and recommended "my lords
and gentlemen " to consider a scheme " for alleviating the
distresses of the poor." This was done, and bills were passed,
•which substantially permitted the importation of foreign
grown grain duty free.
In the midst of all this, Wesley was far from being an in-
different spectator ; and, among the many letters which
appeared in the periodicals of the day, one written by him-
self was not the least important. This letter, published, either
by himself or others, in Lloyd's Evening Post, for December
21, and in the Leeds Mercury for December 29, and in other
newspapers and magazines, is altogether too curious and cha-
racteristic to be omitted or abridged. It is as follows.
" To the Editor of 'Lloyd's Evening Post.'
"Sir, — Many excellent things have been lately published concerning
i\\e present scajxity of provisions. And many causes have been assigned
for it ; but is not something wanting in most of those publications 1
One writer assigns one cause, another one or two more, and strongly
insists upon them. But who has assigned all the causes that manifestly
concur to produce this melancholy effect 1 at the same time pointing
out, how each particular cause affects the price of each particular sort
of provision ?
National Distress, a?id its Remedies. 1 3 1
"I would willingly offer to candid and benevolent men a few hints on 1772
this important subject, proposing a few questions, and adding to each ~ ^
what seems to be the plain and direct answer.
a
I. I. I ask first, Why are thousands of people starving, perishing for
want, in every part of England ? The fact I know : I have seen it with
my eyes, in every corner of the land. I have known those who could only
afford to eat a little coarse food every other day. I have known one
picking up stinking sprats from a dunghill, and carrying them home for
herself and her children. I have knov/n another gathering the bones
which the dogs had left in the streets, and making broth of them, to pro-
long a wretched life. Such is the case, at this day, of multitudes of
people, in a land flowing, as it were, with milk and honey ; abounding
with all the necessaries, the conveniences, the superfluities of life !
" Now why is this ? Why have all these nothing to eat ? Because they
have nothing to do. They have no meat, because they have no work.
'•' 2. But why have they no work? Why are so many thousand people in
London, in Bristol, in Norwich, in every county from one end of England
to the other, utterly destitute of employment 1
" Because the persons who used to employ them cannot afford to do it
any longer. Many, who employed fifty men, now scarce employ ten.
Those, who employed twenty, now employ one, or none at all. They
cannot, as they have no vent for their goods ; food now bearing so high
a price, that the generality of people are hardly able to buy anything
else.
" 3. But to descend from generals to particulars. Why is breadcorn so
dear ? Because such immense quantities of it are continually consumed
by distilling. Indeed, an eminent distiller, near London, hearing this,
warmly replied : * Nay, my partner and I generally distil btit a thousa?id
quarters of corn a week.' Perhaps so. Suppose five-and-twenty distillers,
in and near the town, consume each only the same quantity. Here are
five-and-twenty thousand quarters a week, that is, above twelve hundred
and fifty thousand quarters a year, consumed in and about London ! Add
the distillers throughout England, and have we not reason to believe that
half of the wheat produced in the kingdom is every year consumed, not
by so harmless a way as throwing it into the sea ; but by converting it
into deadly poison — poison that naturally destroys, not only the strength
and life, but also the morals of our countrymen !
" ' Well, but this brings in a large revenue to the king.' Is this an
equivalent for the lives of his subjects ? Would his majesty sell a
hundred thousand of his subjects yearly to Algiers for four hundred
thousand pounds ? Surely no. Will he then sell them for that sum, to be
butchered by their own countrymen ? — ' But otherwise the swine for the
navy cannot be fed.' Not unless they are fed with human flesh .? not
unless they are fatted with human blood .'' O tell it not in Constanti-
nople, that the English raise the royal revenue by selling the blood
and flesh of their countrymen !
"4. But why are oats so dear.-' Because there are four times the horses
Age 69
132 Life and Times of Wesley.
1772 kept (to speak within compass), for coaches and chaises in particular,
than were some years ago. Unless, therefore, four times the oats grew
now as grew then, they cannot be at the same price. If only twice as
much is produced, (which perhaps is near the truth,) the price will natu-
rally be double to what it was.
" As the dearness of grain of one kind will always raise the price of
another, so whatever causes the dearness of wheat and oats must raise
the price of barley too. To account therefore for the dearness of this, we
need only remember what has been observed above, although some par-
ticular causes may concur in producing the same effect.
" 5. Why are beef and mutton so dear ? Because most of the con-
siderable farmers, particularly in the northern counties, who used to
breed large numbers of sheep or horned cattle, and frequently both, no
longer trouble themselves with either sheep, or cows, or oxen ; as they
can turn their land to far better account, by breeding horses alone. Such
is the demand, not only for coach and chaise horses, which are bought
and destroyed in incredible numbers ; but much more for bred horses,
which are yearly exported by hundreds, yea thousands, to France.
" 6. But why are pork, poultry, and eggs so dear } Because of the mono-
polising of farms, as mischievous a monopoly as was ever yet introduced
into these kingdoms. The land which was formerly divided among ten
or twenty little farmers, and enabled them comfortably to provide for
their families, is now generally engrossed by one great farmer. One man
farms an estate of a thousand a year, which formerly maintained ten or
twenty. Every one of these little farmers kept a {q.\v swine, with some
quantity of poultry ; and, having little money, was glad to send his bacon,
or pork, or fowls and eggs, to market continually. Hence, the markets
were plentifully served, and plenty created cheapness ; but, at present, the
great, the gentlemen farmers, are above attending to these httle things.
They breed no poultry or swine, unless for their own use ; consequently
they send none to market. Hence, it is not strange, if two or three of
these living near a. market town occasion such a scarcity of these things,
by preventing the former supply, that the price of them will be double or
treble to what it was before. Hence, (to instance in a small article,) in the
same town where, within my memory, eggs were sold eight or ten a
penny, they are now sold six or eight a groat.
Another cause why beef, mutton, pork, and all kind of victuals are so
dear, is /«A7/ry. What can stand against this? Will it not waste and
destroy all that nature and art can produce? If a person of quality will
boil down three dozen of neat's tongues, to make two or three quarts of
soup (and so proportionably in other things), what wonder if provisions
fail? Only look into the kitchens of the great, the nobility, and gentry,
almost without exception (considering withal that the toe of the peasant
treads upon the heel of the courtier), and when you have observed the
amazing waste which is made there, you will no longer wonder at the
scarcity, and consequently dearness, of the things which they use so much
art to destroy.
Age 69
National Distress, and its Remedies. 133
"7. But why is land so dear? Because, on all these accounts, gentlemen 1772
cannot live as they have been accustomed to do, without increasing their
income, which most of them cannot do but by raising their rents. The
farmer, paying a higher rent for his land, must have a higher price for
the produce of it. This again tends to raise the price of land. And so
the wheel runs round.
"8. But why is it, that not only provisions and land, but well-nigh
everything else is so dear.'' Because of the enormous taxes which are laid
on almost everything that can be named. Not only abundant taxes arc
raised from earth, and fire, and water ; but, in England, the ingenious
statesmen have found a way. to tax the very light ! Only one element
remains, and surely some man of honour will, ere long, contrive to tax
this also. For how long shall the saucy air blow in the face of a gentle-
man, nay, a lord, without paying for it ?
"9. But why are the taxes so high? Because of the national debt.
They must be, while this continues. I have heard that the national
expense, in the time of peace, was, sixty years ago, three millions a year.
Now the bare interest of the public debt amounts to above four millions.
To raise which, with the other expenses of government, those taxes are
absolutely necessary.
"II. Here is the evil. But where is the remedy? Perhaps it exceeds
all the wisdom of man to tell. But it may not be amiss to offer a few
hints, even on this delicate subject.
" I. What remedy is there for this sore evil ? Many thousand poor
people are starving. Find them work, and you will iind them meat. They
will then earn and eat their own bread.
" 2. But how shall their masters give them work, without ruining them-
selves ? Procure vent for it, and it will not hurt their masters to give
them as much work as they can do ; and this will be done by sinking the
price of provisions ; for then people will have money to buy other things
too.
" 3. But how can the price of wheat be reduced ? By prohibiting for
ever that bane of health, that destroyer of strength, of life, and of virtue,
distilling. Perhaps this alone will answer the whole design. If any-
thing more be needful, may not all starch be made of rice, and the im-
portation of this, as well as of wheat, be encouraged ?
" 4. How can the price of oats be reduced ? By reducing the number
of horses. And may not this be effectually done — (i) by laying a tax of
ten pounds on every horse exported to France; (2) by laying an ad-
ditional tax on gentlemen's carriages. Not so much for every wheel, (bare-
faced, shameless partiality !) but ten pounds yearly for every horse. And
these two taxes alone would nearly supply as much as is now given for
leave to poison his majesty's liege subjects.
" 5. How can the price of beef and mutton be reduced ? By increasing
the breed of sheep and horned cattle. And this would be increased seven-
fold, if the price of horses was reduced ; which it surely would be half in
half, by the method above mentioned.
" 6. How can the price of pork and poultry be reduced ? First, by
134 Life and Times of Wesley.
iJJ^ letting no farms of above a hundred pounds a year. Secondly, by re-
AtJe^Q PJ'sssing luxury, either by example, by laws, or both.
"7. How may the price of /and be reduced? By all the methods
above named, all which tend to lessen the expense of housekeeping ; but
especially the last, restraining luxury, which is the grand source of
poverty.
" 8. How may the ^axes be reduced ? By discharging half the national
debt, and so saving at least two millions a year.
"How this can be done the wisdom of the great council of the land
can best determine.
" I am, sir, your humble servant,
"John Wesley.
" Dover. December 9, 1772."
This was not the only thing that Wesley and the Methodists
did, to contribute to the happiness of the starving poor. It
was now that there was organised a band of pious Methodists,
who made it their duty and their pleasure to visit the inmates
of London workhouses, and, by prayer, and reading, and ex-
hortation, to lead them to Him who is alone the great Com-
forter. That organisation has uninterruptedly existed down
to the present time ; and though, for the last twenty years, it
has ceased to be a purely Methodist society, its chief workers
bear the Methodistic name. ^ From the ninety-fifth annual
report of what is now called " The Christian Community,"
we learn that this society was " established under the patron-
age of the Rev. John Wesley, in 1772 ;" and that its
agents, all labouring gratuitously, are regularly visiting the
workhouses of Shoreditch, St. Luke's, Clerkenwell, St.
George's in the East, and Bethnal Green, in eighty-eight
halls and wards of which they hold religious services every
week; and that, besides this, they have three services weekly
in Cambridge Heath female refuge ; visit between twenty
and thirty low lodging houses, in Spitalfields, every Sunday
night; and, during the year, hold- about 463 services in the
^ Mr. George Mackie has the credit of founding this society. He died
in 1821, after being a member of the Methodist society more than fifty
years, and a zealous and respected local preacher for forty.— {Methodist
Alagazine, 1821, p. 939.) The rules of the Christian Community, pub-
lished in 181 1, required, that, "in order to admission, every candidate
must have been a member of the late Rev. John Wesley's society twelve
months ; a man of strict piety and irreproachable character ; and having
a gift for prayer and exhortation."
" The Christian Comimuiifyr 135
open air, deliver nearly 1400 addresses/ and distribute almost 1772
a quarter of a million of religious tracts. Not fewer than a~69
124 visitors and exhorters are employed, nearly the whole of
whom have appointments every week.
Into such a society has been developed the small band of
godly Methodists, sent forth by Wesley, in 1772, to visit
London paupers and London vagabonds. Its work is little
known, and its agents scarcely recognised ; but here, in the
very heart of London, are 124 home missionaries, toiling to
convert the lowest of the low to the faith of Christ, receiving
not a farthing for their services, and carrying on their exten-
sive machinery of tract distribution, tent preaching, and a
circulating library, at the small expense of about ^200 a
year. Success to this unpretending and almost unknown
society. May the God of heaven prosper it, in its great
work, more and more ! " It is a shame," wrote Wesley to
Joseph Benson, on December 11, 1772, "It is a shame for
any Methodist preacher to confine himself to one place. We
are debtors to all the world. We are called to warn every
one, to exhort every one, if by any means we may save
some, I love prayer-meetings, and wish they were set up in
every corner of the town." ^
Such is a bird's eye view of the work done, in 1772, by an
old man, acutely suffering from the disease already men-
tioned. Writing to his brother in November, and again in
December, Wesley says :
" I have just made my tour through Oxfordshire, Bedfordshire, North-
amptonshire, Norfolk, Suffolk, and Essex ; but Kent, Sussex, and Hert-
fordshire still remain to be visited ; only the visitation of the London
classes, a fortnight's work, must come between.
" If we only join faith and works in all our preaching, we shall not fail
of a blessing. But of all preaching, what is usually called gospel preaching
is the most useless, if not the most mischievous : a dull, yea, or lively
harangue on the sufferings of Christ, or salvation by faith, without strongly
inculcating holiness. I see, more and more, that this naturally tends to
drive holiness out of the world."
" I have scarce had a day yet" (December 15) "in London, except Sun-
days, and the time of visiting the classes. Dr. Ford has never come near
^ The number of services held, indoors and out, during the year 1867.
was 6558, and the number of addresses given 7524.
2 Wesley's Works, vol, vii,, p, 390.
136 Life and Times of Wesley.
17 72 me. I am afraid, evasit, enipit. I have wrote to Mr. Fletcher to-day. As
\~6q ^'^^' ■^'^^ '^ ^° ^"^ upon me next, Mr. Fletcher will have a little time to
'^ breathe ; and probably a little more while Mr. Hill is digesting my reply ;
for whom I think we shall, between us, find work for some time.
" You will not set shoulder to shoulder, or you could say something
about the Church. Tv^o are better than one. If we live till August, stand
by me, and we will put the matter home.
" I often cry out, VitcB me redde priori ! Let me be again an Oxford
Methodist. I am often in doubt whether it would not be best for me to
resume all my Oxford rules, great and small. I did then walk closely
with God, and redeem the time. But what have I been doing these thirty
years? My love to all. Adieu ! — John Wesley." ^
The concluding sentences of these extracts sound strangely.
Did afflicted Wesley, amid the London fog of a dark Decem-
ber day, really think, that the last thirty years had been com-
paratively wasted, and that he was more pious when almost a
cloistered monk within the walls of Oxford, than he was now,
a veteran evangelist, flying through the three kingdoms, and
preaching the gospel of God his Saviour.^ His medical
adviser came not near him ; Sir Richard Hill was wantonly
assailing him ; his brother, except as a localised pastor in
London and in Bristol, was of no use to him ; his wife, — bah !
Is it surprising, that even Wesley had seasons of depression ;
and that, like others, he was sometimes "in heaviness through
manifold temptations".''
But it is time to turn to the Calvinian controversy, which
we left raging in 177 1. Wesley rarely mentions it, either in
his journal or in his letters, and yet it continued with un-
diminished fury.
Fletcher, of Madeley, again entered the field of battle, by
publishing "A Third Check to Antinomianism," in a letter
to Sir Richard Hill, i2mo, 114 pages. This was not only a
defence of Wesley, but a triumphant answer to the " Five
Letters" of the baronet, and is written in a style exceedingly
beautiful and Christian. Before the year was out, it reached a
second edition.
Fletcher's other publication, in 1772, was " Logica Gene-
vensis ; or, a Fourth Check to Antinomianism : in which St.
James's pure religion is defended against the charges, and
' Wesley's Works, vol. xii., pp. 130, 131.
Calvinian Controversy. 137
established upon the concessions, of Mr. Richard and Mr. 1772
Rowland Hill. In a Series of Letters to those Gentlemen." a^69
i2mo, 237 pagcs.i
It is no part of our present plan to give even the briefest
analysis of these masterly productions. Suffice it to say, that,
for sound scriptural argument, able exposition, lively ima-
gination, elegance of style, polished irony, and Christian
temper, they have no superiors. The two brothers, notwith-
standing their goodness, their learning, their genius, and their
pluck, were but pigmies in the grasp of a Goliath.
Rowland Hill, a young man of twenty-seven, had expe-
rienced the mortification of being refused ordination by not
fewer than six bishops, and was a roving evangelist, preaching
Avith great success in Whitefield's London Tabernacle, in
Bristol, Bath, and all over the west of England, At the com-
mencement of the controversy, Berridge wrote to him thus :
" The late contest at Bristol seems to turn upon this hinge,
whether it shall be Pope JoJin or Pope Joan. My dear friend,
keep out of all controversy, and wage no war but W'ith the
devil." ^ Unfortunately for himself, the young preacher did
not follow the counsel of the vicar of Everton, but, in 1772,
issued an octavo pamphlet of 71 pages, entitled "Friendly
Remarks occasioned by the Spirit and Doctrines contained in
the Rev. Mr. Fletcher's Vindication, and more particularly in
his Second Check to Antinomianism, to which is added a
Postscript, occasioned by his Third Check." The production is
what might be expected from YOUNG Rowland Hill. Fletcher
is accused of using " tartness of style," " banter," " contempt,"
" numberless sneers, taunts, and sarcasms;" "infernal terms of
darkness," "bravado," "slander," "high flown metaphors,"
" frothy declamation," " odious appellations," " glaring incon-
sistencies," " palpable mistakes." He says, " Wesley has
been a proverb for his contradictions for above thirty years."
^ Toplady writes, November 27, 1773 : " I am informed, that inveterate
troubler in Israel, Mr. John Wesley, has lately published a fourth squib
against Mr. Hill. What a mercy it is, that the enemies of the gospel,
amidst all their plenitude of malice, have little skill and less power ! Mr.
Wesley, considered as a reasoner, is one of the most contemptible writers
that ever set pen to paper !" (Toplady's Posthumous Works, 8vo, 17S0,
P- 330.)
2 Rowland Hill's Life, p. 428.
138 Life and Times of Wesley.
1772 The "Hymns on God's Everlasting Love," "formerly sent
A~69 forth from the Foundery," are stigmatised as " certain godly
lampoons of famous memory." This was pretty strong to
come from a stripling not yet ordained.
His brother also was not a laggard. Without loss of time, he
published an octavo volume of 1 5 1 pages, with the following
gigantic title : " A Review of all the Doctrines taught by the
Rev. Mr. John Wesley ; containing a full and particular
Answer to a Book entitled ' A Second Check to Antinomi-
anism.' In six Letters to the Author of that Book ; wherein
the Doctrines of a twofold Justification, Free Will, Man's
Merit, Sinless Perfection, Finished Salvation, and Real Anti-
nomianism are particularly discussed, and the Puritan Divines
vindicated from the Charges brought against them of holding
Mr. Wesley's Doctrines. To which is added, a Farrago of Hot
and Cold Medicines. By the Rev. Mr. John Wesley, Author
of the * Preservative against Unsettled Notions in Religion,'
Extracted from his own Publications."
Richard Hill's scurrility is quite equal to his brother's. He
writes : " O my dear sir, I never could have supposed that
sneer, banter, and sarcasm, yea, notorious falsehoods, ca-
lumny, and gross perversions, would have appeared under the
sanction of your venerable name." He tells Fletcher that he
" dips his pen in gall," and " maintains his cause by artful
insinuations." " In your first letter," says he, " I really can-
not find many lines together free from gross misrepresenta-
tions and perversions, and hardly one single paragraph ex-
empt from cutting sneers and low sarcasms." " Your pages,"
he adds, " are as totally void of solid Scripture argument as
they are replete with calumny, gross perversions and equivo-
cations." Wesley is treated with the same bitterness as
Fletcher, " His opinions" are said to be " a mixture of Pela-
gianism, semi-Pelagianism, Arminianism, popery, mysticism,
and quakerism." Such quotations might be multiplied ad
nauseam ; but the reader has had enough. Suffice it to add,
that, before the year 1772 was ended, the public was blessed
with " a second, corrected and enlarged edition " of this loving
effusion of the Salopian baronet.
Besides all this, Sir Richard published, in 1772, another
octavo pamphlet of 16 pages, with the title, " Some Remarks
Calvinian Controversy. 139
on a Pamphlet entitled A Third Check to Antinomianism," 1772
a production brief, but, like the rest, far too rancorous. ^"5^
Scurrility is almost a sure sign of feeble arguments and a
defenceless cause.
The two Hills were not Wesley's only antagonists. Toplady
issued his " More Work for ]\Ir. John Wesley ; or, a Vindication
of the Decrees and Providence of God from the Defamations
of a late printed paper, entitled * The Consequence Proved.' "
8vo, 104 pages : 1772.^
In his advertisement, Toplady tells his readers, that he bears
not the least ill will to Wesley ; and that his manuscript had
lain by him for several weeks, " merely with a view of striking
out, from time to time, whatever might savour of undue
asperity and intemperate warmth." The following extracts
will show how far Toplady succeeded in his pious and loving
wish.
" Mr. Wesley has as much of the insidious in his composi-
tion, as he has of the acid ; and it w^ould be difficult to say
which predominates." " He is for adding the lion to the fox.
He wishes not only to wheedle, but to thunder the Church out
of her Calvinism. He is, like Mahommed, for propagating his
religion by the sword. Peals of anathemas are issued, and
torrents of the lowest calumny are thrown out, against all who
abide by the thirty-nine articles. Pope John's authority may
have some weight with such men as Messrs. Walter Sellon,
Haddon Smith, and Thomas Olivers ; but not an inch beyond
the purlieus of ignorance, prejudice, and superstition will his
dictatorship extend." " His mode of phraseology is as preg-
nant with craft as his conduct is destitute of honour. He first
hatches blasphemy, and Xh^n fathers it on others." " His fore-
head must hQ petrified, and quite impervious to a blush." " He
sits down, and deliberately writes a known, wilful, palpable lie
^ Besides the aloove, there were also pubhshed, at this period, the two
following pamphlets, by Jonathan Warne, of Southwark: " Arminianism,
the Back Door to Popery;" price one shilling. And "The Downfall of
Arminianism; or Arminians tried and cast, before the Right Honourable
the Lord "Chief Justice Truth, for holding and propagating false opinions
concerning the five following points, viz. ; (i) Absolute election ; (2) Parti-
cular redemption; (3) The efficacy of God's grace in conversion ; (4) The
impotency of man's will in conversion ; (5) The final perseverance of the
regenerate." 8vo, 145 pages.
140 Life and Times of Wesley.
772 to the public." " He is a pitiful nibbler at the file he cannot
^„ bite." " Thomas Olivers, a journeyman shoemaker, retained
by Mr. Wesley as a lay preacher at the rate of ;:^io per
annum, is his bully in chief In chief, did I say .'' I had forgot
the Rev. Mr. Walter Sellon ; prunella claims precedency of
leather ; Thomas is only second in commission. Mr. Wesley
skulks for shelter under a cobbler's apron." " Has Tom, the
shoemaker, more learning, or more integrity, than John the
priest .''" "Without the least heat or emotion, I plainly say,
Mr. Wesley licsl' ^
The following is part of Mr. Toplady's concluding paragraph.
" One -word to Mr. Wesley himself, and I have done. Time, sir, has
already whitened your locks ; and the hour must shortly come, which
M'ill transmit you to the tribunal of that God, on whose sovereignty a
great part of your hfe has been one continued assault. At that bar /
too must hold up my hand. Omniscience only can tell, winch of us shall
first appear before the Judge of all. I shortly may, you shortly must.
The part you have been permitted to act in the religious world will, sooner
or later, sit heavy on your mind. Depend upon it, a period will arrive
when the Father's electing mercy and the Messiah's adorable 7'ighteous-
ness, will appear xviyoiir eyes, even in yours, to be the only safe anchorage
for a dying sinner. I mean, unless you are actually given over to final
obduration ; which, I trust, you are not ; and to which, 1 most ardently
beseech God, you never may."
Poor young Augustus Toplady, now thirty-one years of
age, after doing his utmost to purge his pamphlet from
offensive expressions, thus, by the electing grace of God,
speaks of a man approaching seventy. Little did he
think, that within seven years he himself would stand
before that bar with which he threatened Wesley ; and
that the hoary headed man, who he thought might be " given
over to final obduration/' would be his survivor nearly
thirteen years.
Besides all this public annoyance, Wesley and Fletcher had
sent to them anonymous letters of the vilest description. Two
may suffice as specimens. Both have Birmingham post
mark, and both were addressed to Fletcher. Both are in
the same handwriting ; the orthography of one is correct, but
of the o\\\Q.x purposely otherwise. In the first are ink sketches
of Wesley and Fletcher in two pulpits, and pelting each
* The italic words are emphasized in the original.
Calvinian Controversy. 141
other with Bibles. In the other, Wesley is represented as 1772
being hanged, and Fletcher is shooting him after he is dead. Age 69
Take an extract from the first, which, though bad enough,
is not the worst that it contains.
" I HAVE sent you a short poem upon parson Wesley.
'There wos a man, Hold Wesley by name,
I rother think yo '11 bee thee same,
From every porsun he gets tuppence a week —
I wish hee was hear, and I'd give him a kick.
He open'd a meeting Inn this town.
And all the benchees dyd fall doun,
I was in the meeting at the same tyme,
But O I cannot find a rheime.
You preach'd a Charrity scrmun wonce.
And sat in the pulpit hke old Punch. ' "
What had Wesley done to deserve all this } Literally
nothing, except publishing the brief and imperfect minutes
of a conversation he had with his itinerant preachers in 1770,
on the subject of Calvinism; and, further, three small tracts,
one an abridgment of Toplady's Zanchius; another an answer
to the question, "What is an Arminian.?" and the third, "The
Consequence Proved." This was absolutely the sum total of
his offence so far as the public was concerned. The minutes fill
little more than an octavo page, and contain not the slightest
reflection upon any one under heaven. The description of
an Arminian occupies only eight pages i2mo, and merely
states, in the most temperate terms, the difference between
the Arminian and Calvinistic creeds. From first to last, the
name of no living man is mentioned, except the name of
Wesley himself. The abridgment of Toplady's Zanchius
fills only twelve pages i2mo, and is honestly and fairly made.
The only thing in it, that can, with any degree of fairness, be
considered personal, is the summing up of the principles of
Zanchius, which occupy half-a-dozen lines, and to which Wesley
appended the words, characteristic enough of the young
predestinarian whose translation he was abridging, " Reader,
believe this, or be damned. Witness my hand, A — T — ."
Then, in reference to the third tract, " The Consequence
Proved," the printed matter fills just eight pages i2mo, and
there is absolutely nothing in it but what is fair argument,
except that Wesley calls Toplady "a young, bold man," and
142 Life and Times of Wesley.
says he will leave him " to be farther corrected by one that is
full his match, Mr. Thomas Olivers." This is all, literally all ;
the first and last ; the substance and the details of Wesley's
offending. The two Hills, one of them not yet forty, and the
other not yet thirty years of age, are never mentioned, or in
the least alluded to, in any of Wesley's publications just
named. And yet, because an old man, who, for more than
thirty years, had been incessantly traversing the three king-
doms to preach the gospel of God his Saviour, happens to
express, in the most temperate language, an opinion contrary
to the Calvinian creed, he becomes the butt of the disgraceful
abuse, specimens of which have been given in the previous
pages. For many a long year, Wesley was lampooned in news-
papers and magazines, and in tracts and pamphlets written
by two different classes of literary men — Samuel Foote, the
comedian, the representative of one, and George Lavington, the
merryandrew bishop, the representative of the other: but now
these were silent; and, in their stead, we have another set of
opponents, far more angry than the former ones, animated by
a spirit quite as bitter, and using opprobrious epithets almost
more offensive; men believing themselves to be among God's
elect, called, and converted; loud religious professors, and
adepts in the art of railing; profound admirers of the dead
Whitefield, but perfect haters of Whitefield's surviving friend,
Wesley. In turn, Wesley had encountered mobs and men
of letters, drunken parsons, furious papists, honest infidels,
and others ; but, of all his enemies, his last were his bitterest
and worst, Calvinistic Christians ! !
Some will blame the writer for furnishing modern readers
with specimens of the foul mouthed language used, respecting
Wesley, by some of the most flaming professors of Christ's re-
ligion a hundred years ago. His answer is, the task is far from
pleasant ; but without a knowledge of Wesley's unmerited
and unparalleled persecutions, who can have a just con-
ception of Wesley's character } The result of such ex-
posures, it is true, is not only to enhance the fame of
Wesley, but to blot the history of his opponents. This no
one regrets more deeply than the present writer ; but he
cannot help it. Besides, it is a fact, which cannot be denied,
that there are some sins which, even though repented of, and
Calviniaii Controversy. 14
pardoned, are, in the present world, always punished. A ^77^
man rails, and God forgives him ; but even forgiveness cannot Age 69
prevent his railing injuring his character. Injured fame, in
such a case, is a penalty unavoidable, reasonable, and right.
We have furnished specimens of the foolish and disgraceful
ravings of Richard and Rowland Hill. What was Wesley's
reply } There is a quiet irony in one of the entries in his
journal, which is worth quoting: "1772. July 11— I was
presented with Mr. Hill's Review, a curiosity in its kind.
But it has nothing to do either with good nature or good
manners; for he is writing to an Arminian. I almost wonder
at his passionate desire to measure swords with me. This is
the third time he has fallen upon me without fear or wit.
Tandem extorqucbis ut vapules."
Accordingly, Wesley prepared and published " Some Re-
marks on Mr, Hill's ' Review of all the Doctrines taught by
Mr. John Wesley.' " This is the tartest of Wesley's publica-
tions, and not without reason. He writes :
" Mr. Fletcher imagined that his opponents would have received his
words in the same spirit wherein they were spoken ; but they turn them
all into poison. He not only loses his sweet words, but they are turned
into bitterness, are interpreted as mere sneer and sarcasm ! A good
lesson for me ! I had designed to have transcribed Mr. Fletcher's
character of Mr. Hill,' and to have added a little thereto, in hope of
softening his spirit; but I see it is in vain; as well might one hope
to soften
'Inexorable Pluto, king of shades !'
"Since he is capable of putting such a construction, even upon Mr.
Fletcher's gentleness and mildness, what will he not ascribe to me .'' I
have done, therefore, with humbling myself to these men, — to Mr. Hill
and his associates ; I have humbled myself to them for these thirty years,
but will do it no more. I have done with attempting to soften their
spirits ; it is all lost labour. Upon men of an ingenuous temper I have
been able to fix an obligation. Bishop Gibson, Dr. Church, and even Dr.
Taylor, were obliged to me for not pushing my advantage. But it is not
so with these ; whatever mercy you show, you are to expect no mercy
from them. 'Mercy,' did I say? Alas! I expect no justice; no more
than I have found already. As they have wrested and distorted my
words from the beginning, so I expect they will do to the end. Mr. Hill's
performance is a specimen. Such mercy, such justice, I am to expect !
' Sir Pvichard Hill did not obtain his title till the death of his father,
in 1783.
144 Life and Times of Wesley.
^772 For forty or fifty years, I have been a little acquainted with controversial
Aee 6q '^^'nters; some of the Romish persuasion, some of our own Church, some
Dissenters of various denominations ; and I have found many among them
as angry as he ; but one so bitter I have not found. A3 a writer, his name
is Wormwood."
This was unsheathing the sword, and casting away the
scabbard.
Wesley proceeds, in most trenchant style, to defend himself
against Hill's grand objection, self inconsistency. Our space
renders it impossible to give an outline of Wesley's answers to
the charges, so recklessly brought against him. The following
is a part of his conclusion :
" I now look back on a train of incidents that have occurred for many
months last past, and adore a wise and gracious Providence, ordering all
things well ! When the circular letter was first dispersed throughout
Great Britain and Ireland, I did not conceive the immense good which
God was about to bring out of that evil. But no sooner did Mr. Fletcher's
first Letters appear than the scene began to open; and the design of
Providence opened more and more, when Mr. Shirley's Narrative, and
Mr. Hill's Letters, constrained him to write his Second and Third Checks
to Antinomianism. It was then indisputably clear, that neither my
brother nor I had borne a sufficient testimony to the truth. For many
years, from a well meant, but ill judged, tenderness, we had suffered the
reprobation preachers (vulgarly called 'gospel preachers') to spread
their poison, almost without opposition. But, at length, they have
awakened us out of sleep : ]\Ir. Hill has answered for all his brethren,
roundly declaring, that ' any agreement with election doubters is a cove-
nant with death.' It is well : we are now forewarned and forearmed. We
look for neither peace nor truce with any who do not openly and expressly
renounce this diabolical sentiment. But since God is on our side, we
will not fear what man can do unto us. We never before saw our way
clear, to do any more than act on the defensive. But since the circular
letter has sounded the alarm, has called forth all their hosts to war ; and
since Mr. Hill has answered the call, drawing the sword, and throwing
away the scabbard ; what remains, but to own the hand of God, and make
a virtue of necessity ? I will no more desire any Arminian, so called, to
remain only on the defensive. Rather chase the fiend, reprobation, to his
own hell, and every doctrine connected with it. Let none pity or spare
one limb of either speculative or practical antinomianism, or of any
doctrine that naturally tends thereto ; only remembering that, however
we are treated by men, who have a dispensation from the vulgar rules of
justice and mercy, we ai-e not to fight them at their own weapons, to re-
turn railing for railing. Those who plead the cause of the God of love are
to imitate Him they serve ; and, however provoked, to use no other
weapons than those of truth and love, of Scripture and reason."
Wesley s Publications, /;/ 1772. 145
Thus did Wesley accept the challenge ; and it is not hazard- 1772
ing too much to make the assertion, that Fletcher's almost Age69
inimitable polemical productions, and Wesley's own sermons,
together with his Arviinian Magazine, started six years after-
wards, did what Wesley wished, namely drove the fiendish
doctrine of reprobation to its " own hell," and gave a blow to
the Calvinian theory, which has been felt from that time to
this.
Wesley's other publications, in 1772, were the following.
1. A revised and enlarged edition of the minutes of his
conferences.
2. The issue of eleven volumes of his revised and collected
works, making a little more than 3900 printed i2mo pages.
3. Two political tracts: one entitled, "Thoughts upon
Liberty " ; the other, " Thoughts concerning the Origin of
Power." The disturbed state of the nation, at this period, has
been already sketched. Junius and John Wilkes were the
arch agitators of the day, and well-nigh drove the nation into
rebellion. Hampson states that, when the Letters of Junius
appeared, Wesley offered his services to the government, and
proposed to answer them, saying, " I will show the difference
between rhetoric and logic." ^ We have no means of either
substantiating or contradicting this ; but Wesley's " Thoughts
upon Liberty " fully show that Wilkes, the demagogue, was
no favourite of his, and that King George had no truer or
more loyal subject than the leader of the Methodists.
In his second tract, Wesley combats the theory, that the
people of a nation are the " origin of power." He shows that, if
this were true, every man, woman, and child ought to possess
the electoral franchise, and to be allowed to take a part in
constituting parliaments and governmental cabinets. He
taunts, with withering sarcasm, the advocates of such a theory,
on the ground, that they themselves resist the facts their
theory implies, because they allowed none to vote except free-
holders of forty shillings yearly value, and not even them un-
less they had arrived at the age of twenty one, " Worse and
worse," he writes : " after depriving half the human species
of their natural rights for want of a beard ; after depriving
* Life of Wesley, vol. iii., p. 160.
VOL. IIL L
146 Life and Times of Wesley.
1 772 myriads more for want of a stiff beard, for not having lived one-
Age 69 and-twcnty years ; you rob others of their birthright for want
of money ! Yet not altogether on this account either ; for
here is an Englishman who has money enough to buy the
estates of fifty freeholders, and yet he must not be numbered
among the people because he has not two or three acres of
land."
Having shown the absurdities which, as he thinks, the
theory involves, he then concludes : " Common sense brings us
back to the grand truth, ' There is no power but of God.' "
Wesley's tract is little known ; but the radical politicians of
the present age would be none the worse for studying the
principles to which it summarily adverts.^
^ To understand some of the allusions, in these two political tracts, it is
necessary to remember that, in 1772, a petition was presented to parha-
ment, signed by about 250 of the clergy, and a considerable number of
the members of the professions of civil law and physic, praying to be
reheved from the necessity of subscribing to the thirty-nine articles of
the Established Church ; and that a bill was passed, in the House of Com-
mons, annulling that part of the Act of Toleration which authorised the
infliction of heavy penalties upon the ministers, schoolmasters, and
private tutors of Dissenters, unless they subscribed to all the doctrinal
parts of the thirty-nine articles. The bill passed the Commons trium-
^ phantly ; the Lords, by a large majority, rejected it !
THE year 1773 will always be memorable in English 1773
annals. It was now that the embryo rebellion in the A"e~*-o
American colonies broke out into overt acts. Insults were
offered to the British flag ; a British ship of war was boarded
and burnt ; and the cargoes of tea, which Lord North had
allowed to be exported from England, duty free, were seized
by rioters and sham Indians, and were discharged into the
ocean with the utmost jubilation. Endless debates took place
in the English parliament ; and fearful fights were fought on
the coasts, and in the wilds and prairies of America. George
Washington was made commander in chief ; and " The Con-
gress of the Thirteen United Colonies " was organised. For
long years, the one great absorbing care of the British parlia-
ment was the war in the western world.
Wesley's health was still seriously affected ; and, hence, he
spent his leisure hours, in the beginning of 1773, in examining
his letters and other manuscripts, so as to determine what he
should leave behind him. He writes : " I made an end of
revising my letters ; and could not but make one remark, —
that, for above these forty years, of all the friends who were
once the most closely united, and afterwards separated from
me, every one had separated himself! He left me, not I
him. And from both mine and their own letters, the steps
whereby they did this are clear and undeniable."
We have already seen, that Wesley thought of making
Fletcher of Madeley his literary executor ; but he now did more
than this. Hence the following letter, sent to Fletcher in Janu-
ary 1773, and written at Shoreham, doubtless at the v^enerable
Perronet's, with whom Wesley had gone to take counsel.
" Dear Sir, — What an amazing work has God wrought in these king-
doms, in less than forty years ! And it not only continues, but increases,
throughout England, Scotland, and Ireland ; nay, it has lately spread into
New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Maryland, and Carolina. But the wise
men of the world say, 'When Mr. Wesley drops, then all this is at an end I'
And so surely it will, unless, before God calls him hence, one is found to
148 Life and Times of Wesley.
stand in his place. For Ovk ayadov noAvKoipavia. Ei? Koipavos eorrw. I see,
more and more, unless there be one Trpoeorcoir, the work can never be carried
on. The body of the preachers are not united ; nor will any part of them
submit to the rest ; so that, either there must be one to preside over all, or
the work will indeed come to an end.
" But who is sufficient for these things ? qualified to preside both over
the preachers and people ? He must be a man of faith and love, and one
that has a single eye to the advancement of the kingdom of God. He
must have a clear understanding ; a knowledge of men and things, parti-
cularly of the Methodist doctrine and discipline ; a ready utterance ;
diligence and activity, with a tolerable share of health. There must be
added to these, favour with the people, with the Methodists in general.
For unless God turn their eyes and their hearts toward him, he will be
quite incapable of the work. He must, likewise, have some degree of
learning ; because there are many adversaries, learned as well as unlearned,
whose mouths must be stopped. But this cannot be done, unless he be
able to meet them on their own ground.
" But has God provided one so qualified ? Who is he .'' T/iou art tJie
mail / God has given you a measure of loving faith ; and a single eye to
His glory. He has given you some knowledge of men and things ; parti-
cularly of the whole plan of IMethodism. You are blessed with some
health, activity, and diligence ; together with a degree of learning. And
to all these He has lately added, by a way none could have foreseen,
favour both with the preachers and the whole people. Come out, then,
in the name of God ! Come to the help of the Lord against the mighty !
Come while I am alive and capable of labour ! Come, while I am able, God
assisting, to build you up in faith, to ripen your gifts, and to introduce you
to the people ! Nil tanti. What possible employment can you have,
which is of so great importance ?
" But you will naturally say, * I am not equal to the task ; I have neither
grace nor gifts for such an employment.' You say true ; it is certain you
have not. And who has ? But do you not know Hivi who is able to give
them ? Perhaps not at once, but rather day by day ; as each is, so shall
your strength be.
"'But this implies,' you may say, 'a thousand crosses, such as I feel I
am not able to bear.' You are not able to bear them itow ; and they are
not now come. Whenever they do come, will He not send them in due
number, weight and measure ? And will they not all be for your profit,
that you may be a partaker of His holiness .''
"Without conferring, therefore, with flesh and blood, come and strengthen
the hands, comfort the heart, and share the labour of your affectionate
friend and brother, "JOHN Wesley." ^
This was a momentous proposal. Why was it not made to
Wesley's brother } We cannot tell ; but the following is
Fletcher's answer.
^ Whitehead's Life of Wesley, vol. ii., p. 355.
Wesley s proposed Successor. 149
" Madeley, February 6, 1773. 1773
"Reverend and dear Sir, — I hope the Lord, who has so wonder-
A*T6* TO
fully stood by you hitherto, will preserve you to see many of your sheep, " '
and 7iie among the rest, enter into rest. Should Providence call yon Jtrst,
I shall do my best, by the Lord's assistance, to he\Y>}'oiir brother to gather
the wreck, and keep together those who are not absolutely bent upon
throwing away the Methodist doctrine or discipline. Every little help
will then be necessary ; and, I hope, I shall not be backward to throw in
my mite.
" In the meantime, you stand sometimes in need of an assistant to serve
tables, and occasionally to fill up a gap. Providence visibly appointed
me to that office many years ago ; and, though it no less evidently called
me here, yet I have not been without doubt, especially for some years
past, whether it would not be expedient that I should resume my place as
your deacon ; not with any view of presiding over the Methodists after
you, (God knows !) but to save you a little in your old age, and be in the
way of receiving, and perhaps of doing, more good. I have sometimes
considered how shameful it was that no clergyman should join you, to keep
in the Church the work which the Lord had enabled you to carry on therein ;
and, as the little estate I have in my nativ^e country is sufficient for my
maintenance, I have thought I would, one day or other, offer you and the
Methodists my free services.
" While my love of retirement, and my dread of appearing upon a higher
stage than that I stand upon here, made me linger, I was providentially
called to do something in Lady Huntingdon's plan ; but, being shut out
there, it appears to me, I am again called to my first work.
" Nevertheless, I would not leave this place, without a /////^r persuasion
that the time is quite come. Not that God uses me much now among
my parishioners, but because I have not sufficiently cleared my conscience
from the blood of all men, especially with regard to ferreting out the poor,
and expostulating with the rich, who make it their business to fly from me.
In the meantime, it shall be my employment to beg the Lord to give me
light, and make me willing to go anywhere or nowhere, to be anything or
nothing.
"I have laid my pen aside for some time; nevertheless, I resumed it
last week, at your brother's request, to go on with my treatise on .
Christian perfection. I have made some alterations in the sheets you
have seen, and hope to have a few more ready for your correction, against
the time you come this way. How deep is the subject ! What need have
I of the Spirit, to search the deep things of God ! Help me by your
prayers, till you can help me by word of mouth.
" I am, reverend and dear sir, your willing, though unprofitable, servant
in the gospel, '"John Fletcher." ^
At the beginning of July, Wesley had an interview with
' Moore's Life of Wesley, vol. ii., p. 259.
150 Life and Times of Wesley.
1773 Fletcher at Madeley, and, on reaching London, sent him the
Age 70 following hitherto unpublished letter.
" Lewisham, July 11, 1773.
" Dear Sir, — It was a great satisfaction to me, that I had the oppor
tunity, which I so long desired, of spending a httle time with you. And 1
really think it would answer many gracious designs of Providence were
we to spend a little more time together. It might be of great advantage
both to ourselves and the people, who may otherwise soon be as sheep
without a shepherd. You say indeed, 'whenever it pleases God to call
me away, you will do all you can to help them.' But will it not then be
too late .'' You may then expect grievous wolves to break in on every
side; and many to arise from among themselves, speaking perverse things.
Both the one and the other stand in awe of me, and do not care to en-
counter me; so that I am able, whether they will or no, to deliver the flock
into your hands. But no one else is. And it seems, this is the very time
when it may be done with the least difficulty. Just now the minds of the
people in general are, on account of the Checks, greatly prejudiced in your
favour. Should we not discern the providential time.? Should we stay
till the impression is worn away? Just now, we have an opportunity of
breaking the ice, of making a little trial. Mr. Richardson is desirous of
making an exchange with you, and spending two or three weeks at
Madeley. This might be done either now, or in October, when I hope to
return from Bristol. And till somicthing of this kind is done, you will not
have that o-rop-yi; for the people which alone can make your labour light in
spending and being spent for them. Methinks 'tis pity we should lose
any time ; for what a vapour is life !
" I am, dear sir, your affectionate friend and brother,
John Wesley."
So the matter ended, though Wesley was far from satisfied.
He writes : " I can never believe it was the will of God, that
such a burning and shining light should be hid under a bushel.
No ; instead of being confined to a country village, it ought to
have shone in every corner of our land. He was full as much
called to sound an alarm through all the nation as Mr. White-
field himself; nay, abundantly more so; seeing he was far
better qualified for that important work. He had a far more
striking person ; equal good breeding ; an equally winning
address ; together with a richer flow of fancy ; a stronger
understanding ; a far greater treasure of learning, both in
languages, philosophy, philology, and divinity ; and, above all,
a more deep and constant communion with the Father, and
with the Son Jesus Christ." ^
' Wesley's Works, vol. xi., p. 288.
Methodism in America and Aiitigua. 151
No wonder that Wesley was anxious for a suitable successor 1773
to take his place. The work of which, in the hand of God, A"e~7o
he was the' principal supporter, had not only spread throughout
the three kingdoms, but was rapidly extending beyond the
Atlantic. Already he had four of his itinerants in America;
and, aged and feeble in health though he was, he still enter-
tained the thought of visiting that distant continent.^ Among
others, the Rev. Mr. Jarratt wrote him, from Virginia, telling
him that they had ninety-five parishes in the colony, all, ex-
cepting one, supplied with clergymen, but that ninety-three out
of the ninety-four ministers appeared to be without " the power
and spirit of vital religion." He thanks him for sending his
preachers to America, two of whom, Messrs. Pilmoor and
Williams, were now labouring in Virginia ; but asks, " What
can two or three preachers do in such an extended country as
this .'' Cannot you do something more for us t Cannot you
send us a minister of the Church of England, to be stationed
in the vacant parish ? I wish you could see how matters are
among us. This would serve instead of a thousand argu-
ments, to induce you to exert yourself in this affair." ^
Even this was not all. During the year, Francis Gilbert
wrote to him from Antigua, telling him that "almost the
whole island seemed to be stirred up to seek the Lord."
There were large congregations and constant preaching in his
brother's house; and they had, at St. John's, a society of twenty
whites and forty blacks. " Here," says Mr. Gilbert, "is work
enough for three preachers ; as almost the entire island seems
ripe for the gospel ; yet, I cannot desire you to send them yet,
seeing the people are not at present able to bear the expenses ;
for the fire, the hurricane, and the severe droughts hav^e, I
suppose, ruined two thirds of the inhabitants." ^
Affairs in Scotland were scarcely to Wesley's mind. Writ-
ing to John Bredin, at Aberdeen, he says :
"My dear Brother, — Observe and enforce all our rules exactly as if
you were in England, or Ireland. By foolish complaisance our preachers,
in Scotland, have often done harm. Be all a Methodist; and strongly
insist QVi full salvation to be received now by simple /(?///;.
" I am yours aftectionatcly, JOHN WESLEY."^
^ Asbury's Journal, vol. i., p. 72. ^ Methodist Magazine, 1786, p. 397.
^ Metlwdist Maj^asine, 1786, p. 567. * IVesleyati Times, May 13, 1861.
152 Life and Times of Wesley.
Joseph Benson had been urged to go to America ; but
Wesley deemed it desirable to send him across the Tweed to
put things right in the northern part of the kingdom. " God/'
says he, " has made practical divinity necessary, and the devil
controversial. Sometimes we must write and preach contro-
versially ; but the less the better. I think we have few, if any,
of our travelling preachers, that love controversy ; but there
will always be men whose mouth it is necessary to stop ; anti-
nomians and Calvinists in particular. By our long silence, we
have done much hurt, both to them and the cause of God.
The more you preach abroad, the better ; keep to the plain,
old Methodist doctrine, laid down in the minutes of the con-
ference. At Trevecca, you were a little warped from this ;
but it was a right hand error. You will be buried in Scotland,
if you sell your mare and sit still. Keep her, and ride con-
tinually. Sit not still, at the peril of your soul and body !
Billy Thompson never satisfied me on this head, not in the
least degree. I say still, we will have travelling preachers in
Scotland, or none. Our preachers shall either travel there, as
in England, or else stay in England."^
Such were some of the difficulties which this veteran evan-
gelist had to meet. No wonder that he wished for help.
Chapel debts, also, still pressed heavily upon him. Hence
the following to Mr. Hopper,
^^ February 6, 1773.
"My dear Brother, — I agreed last year, though contrary to my judg-
ment, that we would have no more weekly subscriptions. I purposed, like-
wise, in my own mind, to concern myself with the debt no more. But,
upon reflection, it seemed to me, there was one way still, namely, not to
apply to the poor at all, (though I would not reject any that offered,) but
to take the burden on myself, and try my personal interest with the rich.
I began at London, where about ^500 are subscribed. Afterwards, I
wrote to many in the country. Liverpool circuit has subscribed about
;^ioo ; Bradford circuit ^130. It must be now or never. I do not know
that I shall concern myself with this matter any more. Till now we never
had a rational prospect of clearing the whole debt in one year. Now it
may be done. It certainly will, if our brethren, in other circuits, do as
these above mentioned have done. What I desire of you is to second the
letters I have wrote, encouraging each man of property in your circuit to
exert himself ; at least, to send me an answer : this, you know, is but
common civility. Now do what you can ; and show that you, my old
^ Wesley's Works, vol. xii., pp. 391, 392.
Wesley mid his Carriage. 153
friend, are not the last and least in love towards your affectionate friend 1773
and brother, . _
"John Wesley." ' ^^e 70
It is now time to trace Wesley's wanderings in 1773.
On Sunday evening, March 7, he set out from London
to Ireland, taking, for the first time, his carriage with
him, which, however, he was deprived of the opportunity of
using. He writes : " March 30 — I was a little surprised to
find the commissioners of the customs would not permit
my chaise to be landed, because, they said, the captain
of a packet boat had no right to bring over goods. Poor
pretence ! However, I was more obliged to them than I then
knew ; for had it come on shore, it would have been utterly
spoiled."
The result was, that Wesley had to hire a chaise instead
of riding in his own ; a vehicle which at Ballibac ferry
went overboard, and, with difficulty, was recovered ; and
which, on another occasion, it took five hours to drag
less than a dozen miles ; which, in a third instance, was dis-
abled by the breaking of the hinder axletree ; and which,
more than once, was in danger of being dashed to pieces by
furious mobs.
Everywhere his congregations were large. In many in-
stances, he had whole troops of soldiers to hear him ; and
nowhere did he meet with any serious disturbance, except at
Waterford, where the papists created a riot, in which heavy
blows were given; and at Enniskillen, where a mob again and
again fell upon the unfortunate carriage, cut it with stones in
several places, smashed its windows, and well-nigh covered it
with sludge.
Three months were spent in itinerating the sister
kingdom. Scores of towns and villages, between Dublin
and Galway, Belfast and Cork, were favoured with his
ministry ; and diversified were the incidents with which he
met. At Eyrecourt, the crowd gave him a loud huzza as
he passed into the market place to preach. At Clare, for
want of other accommodation, he was glad to accept a bed
in the soldiers' barracks. At Castlebar, on finding the
■ ' ■ . ■ I ^ ■ ■■■ I . 1 1, ■ .. 1.^
* Wesley's Worlds, vol. xii., p. 291.
154 Life a 7 id Times of Wesley.
1773 "Charter school a picture of slothfulness, nastiness, and
Age"7o desolation ; and all the children, not only dirty, but with
their stockings hanging about their heels, and in a most
disreputable plight, he reported the facts to the trustees at
Dublin, with the hope of effecting a reformation." At
Limerick, William Myles, a youth in the seventeenth year
of his age, was one of Wesley's hearers, began to meet in
class, and, five years afterwards, became an itinerant
preacher.^ At Armagh, he wrote his invaluable sermon " On
Predestination," preached it at Londonderry, andj at the
request of several of the clergy, published it.^ At Armagh,
also, he heard what he had not heard for fifty years, — an
anthem in a church. At Lisburn, all his spare time was
taken up by poor patients, Avho came to him for physic. He
writes : " What has fashion to do with physic } WHiy, in
Ireland almost as much as with headdress. Blisters, for any-
thing or nothing, were all the fashion when I was in Ireland
last. Now the grand fashionable medicine, for twenty
diseases, is mercury sublimate ! Why is it not a halter, or a
pistol } They would cure a little more speedily."
On the 5th of July, Wesley started for England, having to
hold his annual conference in London. He says: "About
eleven we crossed Dublin bar, and were at Hoylake the next
afternoon. This was the first night I ever lay awake in my
life, though I was at ease in body and mind. I believe few
can say this : in seventy years I never lost one night's
sleep."
Wesley reached the metropolis on the 17th of July; and,
on the 2ist, made the following entry in his journal: "We
had our quarterly meeting at London ; at which I was sur-
prised to find, that our income does not yet meet our expense.
We were again near :^200 bad. My private account I find
still worse. I have laboured as much as many writers ; and
all my labour has gained me, in seventy years, a debt of five
or six hundred pounds."
There is some obscurity in this, as will appear from the
following correspondence.
"^'Methodist Magazine, 1831, p. 290.
2 njid. 1782, pp. 505, 565.
Wesley s Book Property.
DO
*' To Messrs. Thomas Ball and Alexander Mather.
" Lewisham, February 27, 1772.'
"The thing which I desire you to do is this, to see that an exact ac-
count be kept of all the books in Great Britain and Ireland, printed and
sold on my account. You comprehend how many particulars are con-
tained under this general. To do this accurately will require much
thoughts But you will bear that burden for God's sake, and for the sake
of your affectionate brother, << ^^^^^ Wesley."
(Reply.)
"Reverend and dear Sir, — I beg to lay before you Mr. ]\Iather's ac-
count, sent me by letter of the i8th past, of the gross value of your books,
taken in February and March, 1773 ; viz. :—
£
" In London, etc 375-1-
Bristol
Country
Cash
Debts
4253
2716
183
d.
o
8
8
1 1
I
Stock in February, 1772
10929 15 4
. 8833 o 7
/2096 14 9
" Supposed to be owing in March last to printers, binders, etc., ^500.
" I am, reverend sir, your most obedient and dutiful servant,
"Thomas Ball.
"Examined 21st September, 1773:— Thomas Marriott,
Richard Kemp."^
According to the above statement, Wesley was in debt to
printers and binders to the amount of ^500 ; but, at the same
time, he was possessed of books whose gross value was nearly
;^ii,000. How to reconcile the discrepancy we hardly know.
The facts are furnished as we find them. One thing is certain,
there was something wrong. Some have supposed that
Wesley's wife had, by means of false keys, obtained access to
the book steward's cash, and helped herself ; ^ but of that there
is no conclusive proof ; and it is certainly neither generous nor
just to assert the thing without proving it. All that we know
further is, that poor Samuel Franks, the book steward, a man
of great uprightness and earnest piety,^ but naturally of a
' Query : ought not this to be 1773 ?
2 Methodist Magazine, 1842, p. 1013. •* Manuscript.
* Methodist Magazine, 1842, p. 1012.
Age 70
156 Life and Times of Wesley.
1773 sensitive disposition, within a fortnight, fell into a fit of in-
Age 70 sanity, and hanged himself^ Without mentioning this,
Wesley writes : " October 6 — The rest of the week I made
what inquiry I could into the state of my accounts. Some
confusion had arisen from the sudden death of my book-
keeper ; but it was less than might have been expected."
Here we must leave the matter. On the supposition that
Wesley considered his stock of books not his own, but merely
held in trust for the general good, it was quite correct, that,
as the result of his literary labours, he was in debt to the
amount, as he himself says, " of five or six hundred pounds."
In one respect, he was the possessor of a large amount of
property ; in another, he was actually in debt.
Wesley's conference began in London on August 3. He
writes : " August 3 — Our conference began. I preached
mornings as well as evenings ; and it was all one. I found
myself just as strong as if I had preached but once a day."
Good old simple hearted Samuel Bardsley, then an itinerant
of five years' standing, writes, in a manuscript letter now
before us : "I never was at a more comfortable conference.^
We had a deal of love among us. Dear Mr. Wesley laboured
hard. I had the pleasure of hearing him preach twelve times.
He said, he had not preached so much at a conference these
twenty years, and never was more assisted."
It was now that Joseph Bradford was received on trial ;
and that Thomas Olivers was appointed to be Wesley's
travelling companion ; honest Bradford taking the place of
Olivers a year afterwards, and retaining it for the next eight
years. Wesley's effort to extinguish the chapel debts had
resulted in a subscription amounting to £22T)'j. Forty-seven
preachers were present, and, " in order to lay a foundation for
future union," signed the following agreement.
"We whose names are underwritten, being thoroughly convinced of the
necessity of a close union between those whom God is pleased to use as
instruments in this glorious work, in order to preserve this union between
ourselves, are resolved, God being our helper, —
" I. To devote ourselves entirely to God : denying ourselves, taking up
our cross daily, steadily aiming at one thing, to save our own souls, and
them that hear us.
^ Manuscript.
Age
Feast and Fast Days. 157
" II. To preach the old Methodist doctrines, and no other, contained in I773
the minutes of the conferences.
"III. To observe and enforce the whole Methodist disciphne, laid down
in the said minutes."
Wesley had failed in obtaining the consent of Fletcher, to
be his successor ; and, hence, the drawing up and signing of
this conferential compact.
On the first Sunday night, after the conference concluded,
Wesley set out, by coach, on his accustomed tour to Cornwall,
which occupied the next three weeks.
In returning, he spent a month at Bristol^ and among the
societies round about. On October 6, he started in his chaise,
at two o'clock in the morning, and, in the evening, arrived in
London ; thus, in one winter's day, driving in his own con-
veyance a distance of one hundred and fourteen miles. The
rest of October, except the Sundays, was spent in what he
calls his " little tours," through the five counties of Bedford,
Northampton, Oxford, Buckingham^ and Kent.
Ten days, in November, were spent in Norfolk ; then he
met the London classes ; and afterwards went off to Sussex,
and then to Kent. The last entry in his year's itinerary is :
" London : December 25, and on the following days, we had
many happy opportunities of celebrating the solemn feast
days, according to the design of their institution. W^e con-
cluded the year with a fast day, closed with a solemn watch-
night." Thus, in observing feast and fast days, ended the
year 1773. One of these, of course, was Christmas day,
another St. Stephen's, a third St. John's, and a fourth the
Innocents' day. To some it may seem strange, that Wesley,
the Methodist, should observe such festivals as these ; but, in
such matters, Wesley was still the Churchman. Besides,
throughout life, it was one of his most sacred delights to think,
not only of the living, but likewise of the dead. On the 12th
of June, in this very year of 1773, he wrote a letter, an extract
from which is worth preserving.
" It has, in all ages, been allowed, that the communion of saints extends
to those in paradise, as well as those on earth, as they are all one body,
united under one Head ; and
' Can death's interposing tide
Spirits one in Christ divide ? '
158 Life and Times of Wesley.
1773 " -^"^ ^'^ ^^ difficult to say, either what kind, or what degree of union, may
— be between them. It is not improbable, their fellowship with us is far
^ more sensible than ours with them. Suppose any of them are present,
they are hid from our eyes, but we are not hid from their sight. They, no
doubt, clearly discern all our words and actions, if not all our thoughts too.
For it is hard to think these walls of flesh and blood can intercept the
view of an angelic being. But we have, in general, only a faint and indis-
tinct perception of their presence, unless in some peculiar instances, where
it may answer some gracious ends of Divine Providence. Then it may
please God to permit, that they should be perceptible, either by some of
our outward senses, or by an internal sense, for which human language
has not a name. But I suppose this is not a common blessing. I have
known but few instances of it. To keep up constant and close communion
with God is the most likely mean to obtain this also." '
Up to the present, nothing has been said concerning the
progress, in 1773, of the Calvinian controversy. Fletcher's pen
was not idle, but the only works he published were: first, "An
Appeal to Matter of Fact and Common Sense; or, a Rational
Demonstration of Man's Corrupt and Lost Estate," i2mo, 296
pages ; and, secondly, " A Dreadful Phenomenon Described
and Improved, being a Particular Account of the Earthquake
at Madelcy, on May 27, 1773:" l2mo, 104 pages. Neither
of these, however, had any immediate bearing on the matters
in dispute.
On the other side, good old Berridge, of Everton, brought
out his "Christian World Unmasked"; which, if full of faults,
is, at all events, free from dulness ; a book, like its author,
often odd, sometimes coarse, but always pious; full of genius,
and full of goodness ; seasoned with Calvinism's highest
flavour, but entirely free from the personal scurrility so cha-
racteristic of others.
Toplady sent nothing to the press ; but his private letters
were as full of bitterness as ever. " I am told," he writes,
" that Mr. Fletcher has it in contemplation to make an attack
on me. He is welcome. I am ready for him. Tenderness
has no effect on Mr. Wesley and his pretended /«;;«'// of love.
For my own part, I shall never attempt to hew such millstones
with a feather. They must be served as nettles ; press them
close, and they cannot sting. Cobbler Tom laments publicly,
from his preaching tub (misnamed a pulpit), that such an
' Methodist Magazitic, 1S05, p. 520.
Calviniaii Controversy. 159
antinomian as myself should have such crowded auditories, 17 73
while the preachers of the pure gospel (by which he means Age 70
free zuill, merit, and perfection) are so thinly attended. The
envy, malice, and fury of Wesley's party are inconceivable.
But, as violently as they hate me, I dare not, I cannot hate
t/tein in return. I have not so learned Christ. Your idea of
Mr. John Wesley and his associates exactly tallies with mine.
Abstracted from all warmth, and from all prejudice, I believe
him to be the most rancorous hater of the gospel system that
ever appeared in England. I except not Pelagius himself.
The latter had some remains of modesty, and preserved some
appearances of decency ; but the former has outlived all
pretentions to both." ^
Could this impulsiv^e reviler be actually sincere, when he
said he durst not, and could not, hate Wesley and his party .-*
Toplady, so far as printing was concerned, was silent ; but
Richard Hill begun the year as vigorously as ever, by publish-
ing his " Finishing Stroke ; containing some Strictures on the
Rev. Mr. Fletcher's pamphlet, entitled, ' Logica Genevensis,
or a Fourth Check to Antinomianism :' " Svo, 57 pages. This
characteristic piece is dated January 2, 1773. The author
confesses, that he had formed a resolution to be silent ; but
" Logica Genevensis " was too provoking to be passed in
silence. This, however, was to be the real " finishing stroke."
Sir Richard Avrites : " the unfair quotations you have made,
and the shocking misrepresentations and calumnies you have
been guilty of, will, for the future, prevent me from looking
into any of your books, if you should write a thousand
volumes. So here the controversy must end ; at least, it shall
end for me."
Poor Sir Richard ! Such was his resolve ; and yet, almost
before the printer's ink was dry, his godly impetuosity sent
forth another octavo pamphlet, of the same size as the former
one, entitled "Logica Wesleicnsis; or the Farrago Double Dis-
tilled. With an heroic Poem in Praise of Mr. John Wesley:"
63 pages. Hill, as usual, is angry and vindictive. He tells
his readers, that he had never seen Wesley " above four or five
times in his life ; once in the pulpit at West Street chapel ;
^ Toplady's Posthumous Works, 1780, pp. 343-346.
i6o Life and Times of Wesley.
1773 once at a friend's house; and once or twice at his own
Age~7o lodgings in Vine Street." He writes: " I find it just as easy to
catch an eel by the tail, as to lay hold of Mr. Wesley for one
single moment. Oh, what quirks, quibbles, and evasions does
this gentleman descend to, in order to shift off his own incon-
sistencies ! " As a specimen of the writer's " heroic poem,"
we give the following.
"A choice Preservath'e I have,
The like was never known ;
With potions, juleps, drops, and pukes,
Peculiarly my own.
Help Cobbler Tom, and thou Swiss friend,
To lay John Calvin's ghost ;
For what with cynics, bigots, bears,
I fear the day is lost.
We three shall incantations raise.
With tliuitderings, lightnings, hail;
And if the hobgoblin won't avaunt,
I'll bring my comet's tail."
Sir Richard was not content with this. During the year,
he published another octavo pamphlet, of 30 pages, with
the wordy title, " Three Letters written by Richard Hill,
Esq., to the Rev. J. Fletcher, vicar of Madeley, setting forth
Mr. Hill's Reasons for declining any further Controversy
relative to Mr. Wesley's Principles."
He states, that he has heard that Fletcher " wishes to have
done with controversy ; " and upon the strength of this, he
has written to his London bookseller to stop the sale of his
own publications. He begs pardon for " whatever may have
savoured too much of his own spirit" ; and says, restraint
should be put upon several of Wesley's preachers, " particu-
larly upon one Perronet, of whose superlatively abusive and
insolent little piece Charles Wesley had testified his abhor-
rence from the pulpit." He wishes Wesley to be made
acquainted with the action he has taken, and says : " If I stop
the sale of my books, I hope that of the Four Checks will be
stopped also." He adds, that his mother's death had recently
taken place ; and then, at the end of his pamphlet, gives
" a proposed title " to Fletcher's works, and also " A Creed
for Arminians and Perfectionists" ; the latter signed by
"J. F., J. W., and W. S." ^
Calviniaii Controversy. i6i
Such is the substance of the three letters, which, in the 1773
first instance, were sent to Fletcher privately, and were not ^i^o
intended for publication. By some means, however, the fact
of the letters having been written became bruited abroad,
and certain hasty logicians deduced the unauthorised in-
ference, that Sir Richard had recanted his Calvinian doc-
trines. This was too bitter a pill to be swallowed ; and,
hence, the writer, who was weary of the war, gave his private
letters to the public, and attached to them a preface which
had better not been penned.
For instance, he speaks of Thomas Olivers as "a journey-
man cordwainer, who had written a pamphlet against him,
which, though in itself black of the grain, was afterwards
lacquered 2ip, new soled, and Jieel tapped by his master, before
it was exposed to sale." He adds: "I shall not take the
least notice of him, or read a line of his composition, any
more than, if I was travelling, I would stop to lash, or even
order my footman to lash, every impertinent little quadruped
in a village, that should come out and bark at me ; but would
willingly let the contemptible animal have the satisfaction of
thinking he had driven me out of sight."
He then proceeds to accuse Fletcher of "misrepresenting
facts," and of using " artifices, false glosses, pious frauds,
declamation, chicanery, and evasion, to throw dust into the
eyes of his readers ; " and concludes, by saying, that though
he cannot read any more of the productions of Fletcher's pen,
and, therefore, cannot write replies to them, yet, notwith-
standing all in his letters to the contrary, he shall still keep
on sale his "Paris Conversation"; his "Five Letters"; his
" Review of Wesley's Doctrines" ; his " Logica Weslciensis" ;
and his " Finishing Stroke."
Such was the position of Sir Richard Hill in 1773. He
wished for peace. Why .-• Because he was vanquished.
What action did Wesley take } On the ist of April was
published, " Some Remarks on Mr. Hill's Farrago Double
Distilled. By John Wesley." ^ i2mo, 44 pages.
Wesley's " Remarks " are characterised by his wonted keen-
ness, courtesy, wit, and brevity. In conclusion, he writes :
"^ Lloyd's Evening Post, April 2, 1773.
VOL. III. M
1 62 Life and Times of Wesley.
1773 "I beg leave, in my turn, to give you a few advices, i. Becalm. Do
Af^7o "°^ venture into the field again till you are master of your temper. 2. Be
good natured. Passion is not commendable ; but ill nature still less.
3. Be courteous. Show good manners, as well as good nature, to your
opponent, of whatever kind. 4. Be merciful. When you have gained
an advantage over your opponent, do not press it to the uttermost.
Remember the honest quaker's advice to his friend a few years ago :
'Art thou not content to lay John Wesley upon his back, but thou wilt
tread Tiis guts out ?' 5. In writing, do not consider yourself as a man of
fortune, or take any liberty with others on that account. Men of sense
simply consider what is written ; not whether the writer be a lord or a
cobbler. 6. Lastly, Remember, 'for every idle word men shall speak,
they shall give an account in the day of judgment.' Remember, 'by thy
words shalt thou be justified; or by thy words shalt thou be condemned.'"
Wesley's other publications, in 1773, were nine i2mo
volumes of his collected works, making together 3439 pages.
In these were included five small works, now first published :
namely, — r. "An Extract of Two Discourses on the Confla-
gration and Renovation of the World : written by James
Knight, D.D., late Vicar of St. Sepulchre, London;" in
which, by the way, a theory is propounded antagonistic to
the millenarian theory, which Wesley countenanced some
years before. 2. " An Extract from a Treatise concerning
Religious Affections: by the late Rev. Jonathan Edwards."
3. "A Short Account of John Dillon." 4. "Instructions
for Members of Religious Societies." 5. " Christian Reflec-
tions. Translated from the French." These "Reflections"
are three hundred and thirty-six in number. We give one
as a specimen of the rest. " The three greatest punishments
which God can inflict on sinners, in this world, are: i. To
let loose their own desires upon them. 2. To let them
succeed in all they wish for. And, 3. To suffer them to
continue many years in the quiet enjoyment thereof"
Besides the above, Wesley also published " A Short
Roman History." i2mo, 155 pages.
1774-
REFERENCES have been made to the state of Wesley's '^21^
health. His labours had been undiminished, and yet A-e 71
many of his friends had been anxious and alarmed. John .
Pawson, in an unpublished letter, dated Bristol, October 14,
1773, remarks: "Mr. Wesley has been with us for some
time.' He seems to be declining very fast; and I think
there is great reason to fear that he will not be with us
long." There was sufficient cause for solicitude. Wesley's
pain, during the last three years, must have been acute;
and 'it is perfectly marvellous how he managed, without a
murmur, and without abatement, to do the whole of his
accustomed work. At the beginning of 1774, the matter
reached its crisis. He writes :
« January 4— Three or four years ago, a stumbling horse threw me
forward on the pommel of the saddle. I felt a good deal of pain ; but it
soon went off, and I thought of it no more. Some months after I
observed testiculum allcrum altera duplo viajorem esse. I consulted a
physician ; he told me it was a common case, and did not imply any
disease at all. In ^lay twelvemonth, it was grown near as large as a
hen's e^^. Being then at Edinburgh, Dr. Hamilton insisted on my
having "the advice of Drs. Gregory and Munro. They immediately saw
it was a hydrocele, and advised me, as soon as I came to London, to aim
at a radical cure, which they judged might be effected in about sixteen
days. When I came to London, I consulted Mr. Wathen. He advised
me— (i) Not to think of a radical cure, which could not be hoped for,
without my lying in one posture fifteen or sixteen days; and he did not
know whether this might not give a wound to my constitution, which I
should never recover. (2) To do nothing while I continued easy. And
this advice I was determined to take. Last month, the swelling was often
painful So on this day Mr. Wathen performed the operation, and drew
off something more than half a pint of a thin, yellow, transparent water
With this came out, to his no small surprise, a pearl of the size of a small
shot; which he supposed might be one cause of the disorder, by occasion-
ing a conflux of humours to the part."
Such is Wesley's own simple statement. The disease was
unquestionably a serious one; and, yet, it is a surprising fact,
that, only a week after the surgical operation, he was again
164 Life and Times of Wesley.
1774 in harness, and as actively employed as ever. Hence the
A^7i following: "Tuesday, January 11 — I began, at the east end
of the town, to visit the society from house to house. I
know no branch of the pastoral office which is of greater
importance than this. But it is so grievous to flesh and
blood, that I can prevail on few, even of our preachers, to
undertake it."
Wesley's zeal for the extension of his Saviour's kingdom
would hardly let him rest when rest was requisite. His long
life was an unbroken scene of gigantic action. He worked
as though nothing could be done without his working ; and
yet no man more practically acknowledged, that all his
work, without God's blessing, would amount to nothing.
Hence, not only his own ceaseless prayers for the help and
co-operation of his great Master, but also his appointment
of fast days to be observed by the thousands of his followers.
Many of these are mentioned in his journals, but many were
observed without being mentioned. One of these occurred
at the time of which we are now writing. " Yesterday,"
says Samuel Bardsley, on January 25, 1774, " yesterday I
got a letter from Mr. Wesley, informing me that the 28th
instant is to be observed as a day of fasting and prayer for
the prosperity of the gospel." ^ Numbers of such days were
appointed. No wonder Wesley prospered.
The first two months of 1774 were chiefly spent in
London ; and, on March 6, Wesley set out on his northern
visitation, which, as usual, occupied his time till the con-
ference was held in August. This journey has been so often
traversed, that we shall no longer follow Wesley step by step ;
but merely advert to its chief incidents.
At Wolverhampton he was met by his friend Fletcher, of
Madeley, and says : " March 22 — At five in the morning I
explained that important truth, that God trieth us every
moment, weighs all our thoughts, words, and actions, and is
pleased or displeased with us, according to our works. I see
more and more clearly, that there is a great gulf fixed
between us and all those, who, by denying this, sap the
very foundation both of inward and outward holiness."
^ Manuscript letter.
Rev. David Simpson. 165
When he had travelled as far as Congleton, he received 1774
intelligence which compelled him to retrace his steps, and go A'^71
back to Bristol. The entry in the journal of this old man of
more than seventy is a curiosity. "Wednesday, March 30 —
I went on to Congleton, where I received letters, informing me
that my presence was necessary at Bristol. So, about one, I
took chaise, and reached Bristol about half an hour after one
the next day. Having done my business in about two hours,
on Friday in the afternoon I reached Congleton again, about
a hundred and forty' miles from Bristol, no more tired (blessed
be God !) than when I left it." This is marvellous. Here we
have a septuagenarian, in feeble health, travelling, not by
railway, nor yet by coach, but in his own private chaise, in a
wintry month, and on roads not macadamised, a distance of
two hundred and eighty miles in about eight-and-forty hours,
and then quietly sitting down and, without bombast, but with
profound gratitude, recording the fact in the language above
given. Can biography furnish a parallel to, this .'' We doubt it.
On Easter day, April 3, Wesley writes : " I went on to
Macclesfield, and came just in time (so is the scene changed
here) to walk to the old church, with the mayor and the two
ministers."
Here w^e pause, to notice a man, who aftervvards, not only
distinguished himself by his pen and ministerial labours, but
became one of Wesley's sincerest and warmest friends.
One of the " two ministers," referred to in this extract, was
David Simpson, now a young man of twenty-eight. Born at
Ingleby Arnclifife, in Yorkshire, and educated at Northallerton,
and at Scorton, he, in 1766, entered St. John's college, Cam-
bridge, where he became acquainted with Rowland Hill, and
a select society of devout collegians, and was converted. On
leaving college, he was ordained, and accepted the curacy of
Ramsden in Essex. He then removed to Buckingham, where,
by his extempore preaching of justification by faith, and the
nature and necessity of the new birth, he provoked alike the
hostility of the surrounding clergy and the sneers of uncon-
verted laics. About the year 1772, he accepted the invitation
of Charles Roe, Esq., to his residence at Macclesfield, and
soon became curate of what Wesley calls " the old church,"
but which, at that period, was the only church that Maccles-
1 66 Life and Times of Wesley.
1774 field possessed. Here he married Miss Waldy, of Yarm, a
Age~7i young lady of distinguished excellence and piety, who died
within six months after Wesley's visit, leaving to her young
husband the care of an infant daughter. Mr. Simpson's
faithful ministry was as much disliked at Macclesfield as it
had been at Buckingham. Complaints of his Methodism
were made to his diocesan, and twice he was suspended for
preaching doctrines, to which, as a clergyman of the Church
of England, he had solemnly subscribed. Expelled from the
pulpit of the church, he began to preach in the adjacent towns
and villages. Just at this juncture, the prime curacy of the
church became vacant, and, the nomination being an appendage
to the office of the mayor for the time being, Mr. Gould made
him the offer, and had the pleasure of seeing it accepted. To
prevent Simpson's induction, a petition, with seventeen articles
of^ccusation, was transmitted to the bishop of Chester, all of
which might be reduced to one, namely, that he was a Method-
ist. In reply, he says, in a letter to his lordship : " This is
true. ]\Iy method is to preach the great truths of the gospel,
in as plain, and earnest, and affectionate a manner as I am
able. Some, hereby, have become seriously concerned about
their salvation. The change is soon discovered ; they meet
with one or another, who invite them to attend the meetings of
the Methodists, by which their number" (the Methodists) "is
increased to a considerable degree. This is the truth. I own
the fact. I confess myself unequal to the difficulty. What
would your lordship advise .'' " Such was the conflict. Before
it came to an issue, Mr. Roe, at his own expense, erected a
church, of which Mr. Simpson became incumbent in I775»
relinquishing, at the same time, the curacy which had been a
bone of contention. Here he continued to exercise his suc-
cessful ministry until 1799, when he peacefully expired.
Among many others, who were benefited by Simpson's
preaching, was a young female, eighteen years of age, who,
on the very day of Wesley's visit, above recorded, found peace
with God, at Simpson's sacramental service, and afterwards
became the Hester Ann Rogers, whose journals and letters
have been read by myriads.
On leaving Macclesfield, Wesley proceeded to Manchester
and other places. At Bury, Methodism had been cradled in
Wesley in Scotland. 167
a storm. On some occasions, the people were besmeared with ^774
the most offensive filth ; and on others were disturbed in their Age 71
devotions by a huntsman blowing the hunter's horn. Again and
again the vicar frustrated their attempts to erect a chapel ;
but, at length, land at Pitts o' th' Moor was bought ; the poor
Methodists dug the clay and burnt the bricks ; some worked
by day, and others watched by night; and now, in 1774, the
building was completed, and, on the 15 th of April, Wesley
preached in it.
Leaving Lancashire for Yorkshire, Wesley had, for him,
the unusual honour of preaching on April 17 and 18, in three
different churches, at Halifax, Huddersfield, and Heptonstall ;
and, on the Sunday following, he occupied the same position
in the church at Haworth. A few days later, we find him in
Scotland, preaching " to a people, the greatest part of whom,"
says he, " hear much, know everything, and feel nothing."
Here, he tells us, he heard sermons, which unfortunately are
too common at the present day, — sermons full of truth, "but no
more likely to awaken souls than an Italian opera;" and, hence,
he himself began to thunder about death, and judgment, and
eternity. At Glasgow, Methodist matters were not at all to
his satisfaction. " How is it," he asks, "that there is no in-
crease in the society here .-* It is exceeding easy to answer.
One preacher stays here two or three months at a time,
preaching on Sunday mornings, and three or four evenings in
a week. Can a Methodist preacher preserve either bodily
health, or spiritual life, with this exercise .'* And if he is but
half alive, what will the people be .'' "
At Greenock, he found the same fault ; and, at Edinburgh,
wTites: "Here, likewise, the morning preaching had been
given up ; consequently the people were few, dead, and cold.
Things must be remedied, or we must quit the ground."
Wesley attended a Scotch funeral, with which he was dis-
gusted. " O what a difference," says he, " is there between
the English and Scotch method of burial ! The English does
honour to human nature ; and even to the poor remains, that
were once the temple of the Holy Ghost ! But when I see in
Scotland a coffin put into the earth, and covered up without
a word, it reminds me of what was spoken of Jchoiakimj ' He
shall be buried with the burial of an ass ! ' "
i68 Life and Times of Wesley.
1774 At Perth, he says, the generahty of the people were so wise,
Age 71 that they needed no more knowledge, and so good, that they
needed no more religion ; and, hence, he gave them three
thundering sermons, two of them on hell and the day of
judgment.
Wesley's great difficulty in Scotland was the objection to
itinerancy. " I have written," says he, in a letter dated Octo-
ber 16, 1774, "to Dr. Hamilton, that Edinburgh and Dunbar
must be supplied by one preacher. While I live, itinerant
preachers shall be itinerants : I mean, if they choose to remain
in connection with me. The society at Greenock are entirely
at their own disposal : they may either have a preacher be-
tween them and Glasgow, or none at all. But more than one
between them they cannot have. I have too much regard
both for the bodies and souls of our preachers, to let them
be confined to one place any more. I have weighed the
matter, and will serve the Scots as we do the English, or leave
them." ^
The above was addressed to Joseph Benson, at this time
stationed in Scotland, and who has left a memento of Wesley's
visit which is worth quoting. " I was," says he, " constantly
with him for a week. I had an opportunity of examining nar-
rowly his spirit and conduct ; and, I assure you, I am more
than ever persuaded, he is a none sucli. I know not his fellow,
first, for abilities, natural and acquired ; and, secondly, for
his incomparable diligence in the application of those abilities
to the best of employments. His lively fancy, tenacious
memory, clear understanding, ready elocution, manly courage,
indefatigable industry, really amaze me. I admire, but wish
in vain to imitate, his diligent improvement of every moment
of time ; his wonderful exactness even in little things ; the
order and regularity wherewith he does and treats everything
he takes in hand ; together with his quick dispatch of busi-
ness, and calm, cheerful serenity of soul. I ought not to omit
to mention, what is very manifest to all who know him, his
resolution, which no shocks of opposition can shake ; his
patience, which no length of trials can weary ; his zeal for the
glory of God and the good of man, which no waters of per-
^ Wesley's Works, vol. xii., p. 395.
A Marvel ions Escape. 169
sedition or tribulation have yet been able to quench. Happy 1774
man! Long hast thou borne the burden and heat of the day, Age~7i
amidst the insults of foes, and the base treachery of seeming
friends ; but thou shalt rest from thy labours, and thy works
shall follow thee ! " 1
On the loth of June, Wesley reached Newcastle, and, on
the day after, set out for Wolsingham and the dales. Return-
ing to Newcastle, he and his wife's daughter, and two grand-
children, had a marvellous escape from danger and death, in
which Wesley believed that angels, both good and bad, took
part. The narrative cannot be given in fewer or better words
than in his own. We merely premise, that Horsley is a
village a few miles west of Newcastle ; and that Mr, Smith
had married Mrs. Wesley's daughter. Wesley writes :
" Monday, June 20 — About nine, I set out for Horsley, with Mr.
Hopper and Mr. Smith. I took Mrs. Smith, and her two httle girls, in
the chaise with me. About two miles from the town, just on the brow of
the hill, on a sudden both the horses set out, without any visible cause,
and flew down the hill, like an arrow. In a minute, John fell off the
coach box. The horses then went on full speed, sometimes to the edge
of the ditch on the right, sometimes on the left. A cart came up against
them ; they avoided it as exactly as if the man had been on the box. A
narrow bridge was at the foot of the hill. They went directly over the
middle of it. They ran up the next hill with the same speed ; many
persons meeting us, but getting out of the way. Near the top of the hill
was a gate, which led into a farmer's yard. It stood open. They turned
short, and run through it, without touching the gate on one side, or the
post on the other. I thought, ' The gate which is on the other side of the
yard, and is shut, will stop them'; but they rushed through it, as if it had
been a cobweb, and galloped on through the cornfield. The little girls
cried out, ' Grandpapa, save us !' I told them, ' Nothing will hurt you :
do not be afraid'; feeling no more fear or care than if I had been sitting
in my study. The horses ran on, till they came to the edge of a steep
precipice. Just then Mr. Smith, who could not overtake us before,
galloped in between. They stopped in a moment. Had they gone on
ever so little, he and we must have gone down together!"
This was one of the narrowest escapes from death that
Wesley ever had ; and his remarks upon it are worth adding.
" I am persuaded, that both evil and good angels had a large share in
this transaction: how large we do not know now; but we shall know
^ Methodist Magazine, 1825, p. 386.
Age 71
I 70 Life and Times of Wesley.
1774 hereafter. I think some of the most remarkable circLimstances were:
(i) Both the horses, which were tame and quiet as could be, starting out
in a moment, just at the top of the hill, and running down full speed.
(2) The coachman's being thrown on his head with such violence,
and yet not hurt at all. (3) The chaise running again and again to the
edge of each ditch, and yet not into it. (4) The avoiding the cart. (5) The
keeping just the middle of the bridge. (6) The turning short through the
first gate, in a manner that no coachman in England could have turned
them, when in full gallop. (7) The going through the second gate as if it
had been but smoke, without slackening their pace at all. This would
have been impossible, had not the end of the chariot pole struck exactly
on the centre of the gate ; whence the whole, by the sudden impetuous
shock, was broke into small pieces. Lastly, that Mr. Smith struck in
just then : in a minute more we had been down the precipice. ' Let those
give thanks whom the Lord hath redeemed, and delivered from the hand
of the enemy !'"
Newcastle was one of Wesley's favourite haunts. However
cruelly his wife treated him, her daughter and her son in law,
Mr. and Mrs. Smith, always seem to have shown him kind-
ness ; and, hence, he always appeared to quit Newcastle with
reluctance. He writes: "June 27 — I took my leave of this
lovely place and people." The next day was his birthday,
which he celebrated as follows : " This being the first day
of my seventy-second year, I was considering, How is this,
that I find just the same strength as I did thirty years ago .-*
that my sight is considerably better now, and my nerves
firmer, than they were then .'' that I have none of the in-
firmities of old age, and have lost several I had in my
youth } The grand cause is, the good pleasure of God,
who doeth whatsoever pleaseth Him. The chief means are :
(i) My constantly rising at four, for about fifty years. (2) My
generally preaching at five in the morning; one of the most
healthy exercises in the world. (3) My never travelling
less, by sea or land, than four thousand five hundred miles
a year."
Some will smile at this ; but those who think, will hardly
doubt, that the three things mentioned, so far from injuring
health and shortening life, were among the likeliest of all
likely things to be the means of preserving the one, and ex-
tending the other.
It is scarcely necessary to follow Wesley, in his wanderings
through Durham, through the three ridings of the county
Ghosts and Witches. 171
of York, and through Lincolnshire; and then right away 1774
^ through Madeley, Worcester, and Cheltenham, to Bristol, Age 7:
where he arrived on August 6. The reader can easily
find all this in his journal ; we here prefer to give a few
extracts from his letters.
Reference has just been itiade to Wesley's vigour. We
incline to think that, on his birthday, in the bright month
of June, he was sometimes more jubilant than facts war-
ranted. At all events, the following extract from a letter to
his brother, written within two months before his birthday
came, is scarcely in harmony with what was written then.
"Whitehaven, May 6, 1774.
" Dear Brother, — Duty is all I consider. Trouble and reproach
I value not. And I am by no means clear, that I can, with a good
conscience, throw away what I think the providence of God has put into
my hands. Were it not for the chancery suit, I should not hesitate a
moment.
"My complaint increases by slow degrees, much the same as before.
It seems, I am likely to need a surgeon every nine or ten weeks. Mr.
Hey, of Leeds, vehemently advises me, never to attempt what they call a
radical cure.
" I never said a word of ' publishing it after my death.' * I judged it
my duty to pubhsh it now; and I have as good a right to believe one
way as any man has to believe another. I was glad of an opportunity
of declaring m)'self on the head. I beg Hugh Bold to let me think as
well as himself; and to believe my judgment will go as far as his. I
have no doubt of the substance, both of Glanvil's and Cotton Mather's
narratives.^ Therefore, in this point, you that are otherwise minded,
bear with me. Veniam petiimisque daimisqiie vicissim. Remember, I
am, upon full consideration, and seventy years' experience, just as
obstinate in my opinion as you in yours. Do not you think, the dis-
turbances in my father's house were a Cock Lane story ? Peace be with
you and yours! "John Wesley." ^
Such was Wesley's reply to his brother's remonstrance
against the publication of his opinions on witchcraft and
apparitions. The next letter, addressed to a lady in Ireland,
* The following probably refers to the ghost stories, in Wesley's
Journal, under date May 25, 1768. The fifteenth number of his journal,
containing these accounts, was published in this same year, 1774.
2 Glanvil, the author of " Some Considerations touching the being
of Witches and Witchcraft"; and Mather, the author of "The Wonders
of the Invisible World, or the Trials of Witches."
^ Wesley's Works, vol. xii., p. 131.
172 Life and Times of Wesley.
1774 refers to two important matters, — the Calvinian contro-
Ai;e 71 versy, and Wesley's method of dealing with contumacious
Methodists.
" Leeds, May 2, 1774.
" My dear Sister, — Until Mr. Hill and his associates puzzled the
cause, it was as plain as plain could be. The Methodists always held, and
have declared a thousand times, the death of Christ is the meritorious
cause of our salvation ; that is, of pardon, holiness, and glory : loving,
obedient faith is the condition of glory. This Mr. Fletcher has so
illustrated and confirmed, as, I think, scarcely any one has done before
since the apostles.
"When Mr. W. wrote me a vehement letter concerning the abuse
he had received from the young men in Limerick, and his determination
to put them all out of society, if they did not acknowledge their fault,
I much wondered what could be the matter, and only wrote him word,
' I never put any out of our society for anything they say of me.'
" Your ever affectionate
"John Wesley."'
The ensuhig letters have relation to a book, an abridg-
ment of which Wesley afterwards published, and concerning
which some of his admirers have felt puzzled, and others
pained. This is not the place for a disquisition on novels and
novel reading; but it is a curious fact, that W^esley, the
earnest and untiring evangelist, found time, not only to read
a novel, but to print it,
Henry Brooke, Esq., an Irish barrister, was the son of
an Irish rector; and, besides a number of plays and poems,
in four volumes, 8vo, was the author of two novels, "The
Fool of Quality," and "Juliet Grenville."^ His nephew,
Henry, was a devoted Methodist, a friend of Fletcher, and
one of Wesley's correspondents. " The Fool of Quality" was
first published, in five vols., in 1766, and was thus criticised
in the AlontJily Review of that period. " A performance en-
^ Wesley's Works, vol. xii., p. 373.
^ Mr. Brooke was three years the junior of Wesley, and, about the time
when Methodism had its birth, was the honoured friend of many of the
most distinguished personages in London society. Swift prophesied won-
ders of him ; Pope received him with open arms ; Pitt paid him marked
attention ; and the Prince of Wales presented him with valuable tokens
of his friendship. The publication however of his tragedy, " Gustavus
Vasa," offended the government, and he retired to Ireland, and devoted
his fine genius wholly to the muses. He was a man of rare ability, and
an earnest Christian.
" The Fool of Quality:' i n
riched by t^enius, enlivened by fancy, bewildered with enthu- i774
siasm, and overrun with the visionary jargon of fanaticism. Age 71
We wish the author would give us an abridgment, cleared
from the sanctimonious rubbish by which its beauties are so
much obscured. In its present state, it will be a favourite only
with Behmenites, Herrnhutters, Methodists, Hutchinsonians,
and some of the Roman Catholics."
This was the book which Wesley read, and concerning
which he wrote to Plenry Brooke, the author's nephew.
"Hull, July 8, 1774.
"Dear Harry, — When I read over, in Ireland, 'The Fool of Quality,'
I could not but observe the design of it, to promote the religion of the
heart, and that it was well calculated to answer that design ; the same
thing I observed, a week or two ago, concerning 'Juliet Grenville.' Yet,
there seemed to me to be a few passages, both in the one and the other,
which might be altered for the better; I do not mean, so much with
regard to the sentiments, which are generally very just, as with regard to
the structure of the story, which seemed here and there to be not quite
clear. I had, at first, a thought of writing to Mr. Brooke himself, but I
did not know whether I might take the liberty. Few authors will thank
you, for imagining you are able to correct their works. But, if he could
bear it, and thinks it would be of any use, I would give another reading
to both these works, and send him my thoughts without reserve, just as
they occur. I am, etc.,
"John Wesley." »
The answer to this was as follows.
" Dublin, August 6, 1774.
"Reverend Sir,— My uncle's health is greatly impaired.- A kind of
vertigo continues not only to enfeeble his limbs', but to interrupt his study
and writing. However, I trust, as his outward man decays, his inward
man is renewed daily.
" He is deeply sensible of your very kind offer, and most cordially em-
braces it. He has desired me to express the warmth of his gratitude in
the strongest terms, and says he most cheerfully yields the volumes you
mention, to your superior judgment, to prune, erase, and alter as you
please. He only wishes, they could have had your eye before they
appeared in public. But it is not yet too late. A second edition will
appear with great advantage, when they have undergone so kind a revisal.
But he is apprehensive, your time is so precious, that it may be too great
an intrusion upon it, unless made a work of leisure and opportunity.
^ Life of Mr. Henry Brooke, p. 90.
2 He died in 1783, three years after Wesley published his revised and
abridged edition in two vols., i2mo.
I 74 Life and Times of Wesley.
1774 Yet, as you have proffered it, he will not give up the privilege; but hopes
A<Te^r leisure may be found for so friendly and generous a work.
"I am, reverend sir, your most affectionate friend and brother,
"H. Brooke."'
Perhaps there have been published as many portraits of
Wesley as of any man that ever lived. The year 1774 was,
in this respect, remarkable. At its commencement, Wesley
writes : " I was desired by Mrs. Wright, of New York, to let
her take my t.^%y in waxwork. She has that of Mr. White-
field and many others ; but none of them, I think, comes up
to a well drawn picture." Query, what has become of this
waxwork efhgy t Besides the waxwork figure, there were
others. From the manuscript letters of Samuel Bardsley, we
learn that, already, the potters of Staffordshire had printed
his likeness on their crockery ; and Mr. Voyes of Corbridge
had had it engraved on the seals he sold.
These are little facts; but they indicate Wesley's growing
popularity. The people ask for the portraits of public men
only. A man must be notorious before the masses wish to
see him. Thus it was in the case of Wesley. For five-and-
thirty years, he had been before the public. No man had
been more bitterly persecuted by his enemies; and no man
was more ardently beloved by his friends. His fame had
spread throughout the three kingdoms; and all sorts of
artists began to use him for their own advantage.
Wesley was not fond of sitting for his portrait, though this
was often done. On one occasion, while dining with a friend,
in the neighbourhood of Blackfriars, an eminent artist offered
him ten guineas as a bribe, to induce him to allow a cast of
his face to be taken. " No," said Wesley, " keep your money,
and urge me no further." "Sir," said the artist, " I will not
detain you more than three minutes." Wesley consented ; the
cast was taken; and so also was the money: but no sooner
was Wesley out of doors, than he saw an agitated crowd, sur-
rounding an auctioneer, who was about to sell, not only the
furniture of a poor debtor, but the bed upon which he was
actually dying. In an instant, Wesley rushed into the throng,
seized the arm of the auctioneer, and cried, " What 's the
^ Methodist Magazine, 1787, p. 160.
AletJwdisni in America. 175
debt?" "Ten guineas," was the answer. "Take it," said i774
Wesley, "and let the poor man have his furniture again;" Age 71
and, then turning to John Broadbent, who was with him, he
quietly observed, "Brother Broadbent, I see why God sent
me these ten guineas." ^
Methodism in America has been mentioned. The work
there was now greatly growing. Twelve months before,
Wesley had sent out one of his favourite preachers, Thomas
Rankin, to act as a sort of generalissimo. Perhaps a wiser
selection might have been made. At all events, Rankin's
honest hearted brusqueness sometimes gave offence. Board-
man and Pilmoor, and Asbury, were all predecessors in point
of time; but they and four other itinerants had now to recog-
nise Rankin as their chief In age and ministerial standing,
they were nearly equal ; but Rankin, by Wesley's favour, had
the preeminence. Asbury winced, but was too good a man
to raise rebellion. He Avrites: "1774, May 25 — Our conference
began at Philadelphia. The overbearing spirit of a certain
person had excited my fears. My judgment was stubbornly
opposed for a while, and, at last, submitted to. But it is my
duty to bear all things with a meek and patient spirit. Our
conference was attended with great power, and all acquiesced
in the future stations of the preachers. If I were not deeply
conscious of the truth and goodness of the cause in which I
am engaged, I should, by no means, stay here. Lord, what a
world is this ! yea, what a religious world !" ^
Within two years, the entire band were scattered by the
colonial rebellion, and apostolic Asbury was the only one
remaining. Meanwhile, Rankin sent to Wesley an account of
the first Methodist conference in America, and Wesley replied
to him as follows.
"Epworth, July 11, 1774.
" Dear Tommy, — In yours of May the 30th, you give me an agreeable
account of your little conference in Philadelphia. I think G. Shadford
and you desire no novelties, but love good old Methodist discipline and
doctrine. I have been lately thinking a good deal on one point, wherein,
perhaps, we have all been wanting. We have not made it a rule, as soon
as ever persons were .justified, to remind them of going on to perfection.
^ Christian Miscellany, 1846, p. 93.
2 Asbury's Journal, vol. i., p. 112.
ij6 Life and Times of Wesley.
1774 Whereas, this is the very time preferable to all others. They have then
P~ _ the simplicity of little children ; and they are fervent in spirit, ready to
cut off the right hand, or to pluck out the right eye. But, if we once suffer
this fervour to subside, we shall find it hard enough to bring them again
t'^ ^^^^ P°^"^- «Iam,etc.,
"John Wesley." 1
Before passing from America, it is worth recording, that it
was in the year 1774 that Methodism was introduced into
another part of Newfoundland. In the month of March in
that year, John Hoskins, a London Methodist, and his son, a
lad of about sixteen years of age, embarked at Poole in Dorset-
shire, and landed in Newfoundland five weeks afterwards.
The intention of Hoskins was to work there till he had
obtained money enough to take him to New England, where
he wished to begin a school, He landed at Trinity penniless,
and utterly unknown, and found himself in a "rocky, deso-
late country," and surrounded by a " few, low, mean huts,
built of wood." He entered one to make inquiries as to how
he might obtain subsistence ; the good woman of the hut
gave him some seal and bread to eat ; and the minister of the
place advised him to open a school at Old Perlican, where
about fifty families resided. Away he went, a distance of
one-and-twenty miles ; the people received him gladly ; and
his school was opened. Here there was literally no religious
worship whatever ; but the schoolmaster began to read the
Church prayers, and Wesley's sermons ; the people standing at
a distance and looking at him as if he had been a monster.
He then proceeded to give extempore exhortations ; a
few began to be serious ; some helped him to sing ; sixteen
became penitent, and were formed into a class ; and two or
three soon found peace with God. Just at this juncture, Mr.
Arthur Thomy, an Irish merchant, visited the place on busi-
ness, and preached twice or thrice, confirming what Hoskins
had said, and the society increased to forty members, and the
believers to eight.
Thus was Methodism begun at Old Perlican. It soon
spread. Island Cove had a society of thirty, and was the ^
first to build a chapel. At Harbourgrace and Carbonear,
* Palmer's " Four Years in the Old World," p. 260.
Conference of ij'j^. 177
where Mr. Coughlan had laboured, Calvinism and anti- 1774
nomianism were rampant, and Methodism had dwindled to a*^;!
almost nothing. The movement at Old Perlican was a new
beginning ; and Hoskins, the schoolmaster, and Thorny, the
Irish merchant, were the chief actors. Thorny often travelled
as far as fifty miles to preach ; and sometimes met with brutal
treatment. The Irish were his bitterest enemies, and, on one
occasion, came with their shillalahs to kill him. Hoskins,
also, had his share of persecution. Once he was daubed all
over with tar, and was further threatened to be stuck with
feathers. The work, however, prospered ; and, in 1785, New-
foiindland became one of the circuits in Wesley's minutes.
The conference, at Bristol, was opened on August 9. Wesley
writes : " The conference, which begun and ended in love,
fully employed me on Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday ;
and we observed Friday, 1 2th, as a day of fasting and prayer
for the success of the gospel."
Thomas Taylor, who was present, says: "August 9 — Most of
the day was taken up in temporal matters, which is dry busi-
ness. August 10 — This morning our characters were ex-
amined, and that closely. The afternoon was chiefly spent in
taking in new preachers. In the evening, Mr. Wesley gave us
but an indifferent sermon. August ii — We spent this day
pretty profitably in considering some things of importance ;
especially how to prevent levity, idleness, and evil speaking.
At night, Mr. Wesley gave us a profitable discourse on bro-
therly love." 1
Miss March, in an unpublished letter, dated August 2^,
1774, observes :
" Our conference is now ended. I promised myself a jubilee, a time of
holy rejoicing, but found it rather a season of hurry and dissipation. Mr.
Wesley opened the conference with a plan of great and necessary business.
His preaching was chiefly to the preachers, — of the searching, reproving
kind. The preachers said there was much concord amongst them, and
one observed, Mr. Wesley seemed to do all the business himself. Friday
was the best time, and the evening sermon, from Matthew vii. 24, was the
prettiest and most simple discourse I ever heard on that text. Mr. Wesley
left us on Monday for Wales. When he first came he looked worn down
with care and sorrow ; but he left us well and lively."
It was at this conference that Samuel Bradburn and James
* Taylor's manuscript journal
VOL. III. N
lyS Life and Times of Wesley.
1774 Rogers were admitted on trial; and that Joseph Pilmoor, for
Age 71 some reason, deserted Thomas Rankin in America, and
desisted from travelling.
No sooner was the conference over, than Wesley again set
out on his evangelistic travels. The next twelve days were
spent in Wales. He returned to Bristol for the Sunday ser-
vices on August 28 ; and, on the day following, started off to
Cornwall. He came back to Bristol on September 9, and
employed the next month in the city and its neighbourhood.
Being the time of a parliamentary election, he met the Bristol
society, and advised those of them who had votes : — " i. To
vote, without fee or reward, for the person they judged most
worthy. 2. To speak no evil of the person they voted against.
3. To take care their spirits were not sharpened against those
that voted on the other side."
Wesley came to London on October 15, and spent the
remainder of the year in his usual winter journeys.
Norwich was again a trouble. He writes : " Never was a
poor society so neglected as this has been for the year past.
The morning preaching was at an end ; the bands suffered all
to fall in pieces ; and no care at all taken of the classes, so
that, whether they met or not, it was all one ; going to church
and sacrament were forgotten ; and the people rambled hither
and thither as they listed. I met the society, and told them
plain, I was resolved to have a regular society or none. I
then read the rules, and desired every one to consider whether
he was willing to walk by these rules or no. Those, in parti-
cular, of meeting their class every week, unless hindered by
distance or sickness ; and being constant at church and sacra-
nnent. I desired those who were so minded to meet me the
next night, and the rest to stay away. The next night we
had far the greater part. I spoke to every leader, concerning
every one under his care, and put out every person whom they
^ could not recommend to me. After this was done, out of 204
members, 174 remained. And these points shall be carried,
if only fifty remain in society."
On his return to London, he visited Ely and St. Ives,
and met with an' adventure which was strange, even in
his experience. Approaching Ely, Mr. Dancer met him with
a chaise. For a mile and a half, the road was inundated.
An Adventure. 179
" How must foot people come to Ely ? " he asked. " Why," ^774
replied simple Mr. Dancer, "they must wade." The Age 71
farther he went, the more difficult and dangerous was the
way. Between Ely and St. Ives, snow fell in great abundance,
and, at considerable peril, Wesley's borrowed chaise was
piloted by Mr. Tubbs, who trudged along, at the horse's head,
and, up to his knees in mud and water, naively said, " We fen
men don't mind a little dirt." For four miles, W^esley Avas
dragged through this " slough of despond," when further pro-
gress, for the vehicle, became impossible. He tried to proceed
on horseback ; but this also was soon impracticable, the whole
district being one wide waste of water. " Here, therefore,
says he, " I procured a boat, full twice as large as a kneading
trough. I was at one end, and a boy at the other, who
paddled me safe to Erith ; where Miss L waited for me
with another chaise, which brought me safe to St. Ives."
Wesley concluded the year's itinerary thus : " December
25 — During the twelve festival days, we had the Lord's supper
daily; a little emblem of the primitive church."
Was this a lingering remnant of Wesley's high churchism.^
What would be said of the Methodists of the present day,
were they to imitate th-e example of their founder t
The Calvinian controversy still proceeded. The Gospel
Magazine told its readers, that Arminianism "is a system
founded in ignorance, supported by pride, and will end in
delusion." The Hon. and Rev. W. B. Cadogan, a young man
of twenty-three, and, though not yet ordained, already pre-
sented to the living of St. Giles, Reading, burned Wesley's
works in his kitchen, saying " he was determined to form his
opinions from the Bible alone." ^ The two Hills were silent,
with the exception of Mr. Richard's "Lash at Enthusiasm, in a
Dialogue founded upon real Facts." The principal Calvinistic
work, published at this period, was Toplady's "Historic Proof
of the Doctrinal Calvinism of the Church of England," in two
volumes, 8vo, with an Introduction, most lamentably virulent.
The subject is repulsive ; but, rightly to understand Wesley's
provocations and patience, it is necessary to give extracts from
this scandalous production of a conceited but clever man, who
' Memoirs of Cadogan, p. 37.
1 86 Life and Times of Wesley.
1774 acted as though the Almighty had elected him to revile his
Age 71 neighbours, without either sense or reason.
" Mr. John Wesley and Mr. Walter Sellon are a pair of
insignificant adversaries, who have arraigned, tried, and con-
demned the Church of England. In general, they are so
excessively scurrilous and abusive, that contending with them
resembles fighting with chimney sweepers, or bathing in a
mud pool" " Mr. Walter Sellon is Mr. John Wesley's
retainer general and whitewasher in ordinary. Arminianism is
their mutual Dulcinea del Toboso. High mounted on Pine's
Rosinante, forth sallies Mr. John from Wine Street, Bristol,
brandishing his reed, and vowing vengeance against all, who
will not fall down and worship the Dutch image which he has
set up. With an almost equal plenitude of zeal and prowess,
forth trots Mr. Walter from Ave Maria Lane, low mounted on
Cabe's halting dapple. The knight and the squire having
met at the rendezvous appointed, the former prances fore-
most, and, with as much haste as his limping steed will
permit, doth trusty Walter amble after his master." Sellon
is Wesley's "understrapper"; the "junto are Parthians aiming
their arrows at the sun ; and wolves exhausting their strength
by howling at the moon." Sellon " dips his pen in the
common sewer"; and Wesley "scatters firebrands." "The
world has long seen, that unmixed politeness can no more
soften Mr. Wesley's rugged rudeness, than the melody of
David's harp could lay the north wind." Sellon was " a
small body of Pelagian divinity, bound in calf, neither gilt
nor lettered " ; " the meanest, and most rancorous Arminian
priest that ever disgraced a surplice." " We would advise his
Arminian holiness of Rome to cashier the image of St. Austin
from serving any longer as a support to his easy chair ; and
to procure an Q^gy of Mr. Walter Sellon, to serve — not,
indeed, upon due recollection, as a stay to his holiness's
throne — nor even as a prop to his footstool ; but as a leg to a
certain convenience (a sella perforata, though not the sella
porphyretica), whereon, I presume, his holiness deigns,
occasionally, to sit." Wesley's Notes on the New Testament
are "a wretched bundle of plagiarisms"; and he himself
"drives a larger traffic in blunders and blasphemies than any
other blunder merchant this island has produced."
Calvinian Controversy. i8i
Such are a few of the mild and merciful oracular utterances i774
of the elect Augustus Toplady ; who says he blamed himself Age 71
" for handling Wesley too gently, and for only giving him the
whip when he deserved a scorpion."
Fletcher, during 1774, published : — (i) "The Fictitious and
the Genuine Creed ; being ' A Creed for Arminians,' composed
by Richard Hill, Esq. ; to which is opposed a Creed for those
who believe that Christ tasted death for every man." l2mo,
52 pages. (2) " Logica Genevensis continued; or, the first
part of the Fifth Check to Antinomianism, containing an
Answer to * The Finishing Stroke ' of Richard Hill, Esq. ; in
which some remarks upon Mr. Fulsome's Antinomian Creed,
published by the Rev. Mr. Berridge, are occasionally intro-
duced." i2mo, 48 pages. (3) "Logica Genevensis continued;
or, the second part of the Fifth Check to Antinomianism,
containing a Defence of ' Jack o' Lanthorn,' and ' The Paper
Kite,' i. e. sincere obedience ; and of the 'Cobweb,' i.e. the
evangelical law of liberty; and of the 'Valiant Sergeant, J. F.,'
i. e. the conditionality of perseverance, attacked by the Rev.
Mr. Berridge, in his book called ' The Christian World Un-
masked.'" i2mo, 44 pages. (4) "The First Part of an Equal
Check to Pharisaism and Antinomianism." l2mo, 264 pages.
(5) " Zelotes and Honestus reconciled ; or, an Equal Check to
Pharisaism and Antinomianism continued : being the first
part of the Scripture Scales to weigh the Gold of Gospel
Truth. With a Preface containing some Strictures upon the
Three Letters of Richard Hill, Esq., which have been lately
published." i2mo, 175 pages.
The whole of these publications, extending to nearly 600
pages, are full of the greatest truths, and, like all Fletcher's
writings, are entirely free from personal abuse, and are worthy
of a" gentleman, a scholar, and a Christian.
W^e can hardly say as much of another work, published in
1774: "A Scourge to Calumny, in two parts, inscribed to
Richard Hill, Esq. Part the First, demonstrating the
Absurdity of that Gentleman's Farrago. Part the Second,
containing a full Answer to all that is material in his Farrago
Double Distilled. By Thomas Olivers." i2mo, 168 pages.
Richard Hill deserved all he got ; but Fletcher would have
hesitated before charging him, as is done by Olivers, " with
1 82 Life and Times of Wesley.
^774 tvilful itntr2Lth" At the same time, it is impossible not to
Age 71 have a feeling of admiration for the sturdy Welshman, when
he says to the wealthy squire, who had rudely called him Tom
the cobbler: "Permit me to tell you, sir, that my name is as
sacred to me, as yours is to you. \{ you were the greatest peer
of the realm, and / the poorest peasant, the laws of God and
of my country would authorise me to call you to an account,
for every insult offered to my character, either as a fellow
creature, or as an Englishman. You have no more authority,
either from reason or religion, to call me Tom, than I have
to call you Dick."
Having hurled a lance in his own defence, he then proceeds
to defend Wesley, telling Mr. Hill, that the man he had
maligned was one who had published a hundred volumes,
who travelled yearly about five thousand miles, preached
yearly about a thousand sermons, visited as many sick beds
as he preached sermons, and wrote twice as many letters ; and
who, though now between seventy and eighty years of age,
" absolutely refused to abate, in the smallest degree, these
mighty labours ; but might be seen, at this very time, with his
silver locks about his ears, and with a meagre, worn out,
skeleton body, smiling at storms and tempests, at such labours
and fatigues, at such difficulties and dangers, as, I believe,"
says Olivers, " would be absolutely intolerable to you, sir, in
conjunction with any four oi your most faming ministers."
Wesley's own publications, in 1774, were not many.
First of all, there was the fifteenth number of his Journal,
already mentioned : i2mo, 112 pages. Then there was "An
Extract from Dr. Cadogan's Dissertations on the Gout, and all
Chronic Diseases," already referred to on page in. i2mo, 49
pages. This was a bold stroke. Dr. Cadogan's work had not
been more than ten years published ; it had been extremely
popular, and had run through several editions ; the doctor
himself was now at the zenith of his fame, and did not die for
three-and-twenty years afterwards ; and, yet, Wesley takes
upon himself, not to publish the work itself, but an extract from
it, and to write a preface to it, in which he objects to the
doctor's wholesale condemnation of "smoked and salted meats,
of pickles, of wine, and of flesh, thoroughly roasted or boiled."
Wesley says : " I recommend the book as the most masterly
Wesley s Ptiblications, in lyy^. 183
piece upon the subject, which has yet appeared in the English 17 74
language." A^Tyi
Another of Wesley's publications was " Thoughts upon
Necessity," i2mo, 33 pages. This was one of his most
thoughtful and able tracts. Its purport may be gathered
from a sentence in his preface,-^" I cannot believe the noblest
creature in the visible world to be only a fine piece of clock-
work."
To the above must be added his " Thoughts on Slavery,"
Svo, 53 pages. It ought never to be forgotten, that John
Wesley was one of the very first of England's philanthro-
pists to denounce the infamous evil of slavery. Statues,
and other honours, declarative of a nation's homage, have
• been justly awarded to Wilberforce ; but Wesley's record is
on high ; and the day has yet to come when the influence of
his advanced views will be duly and gratefully recognised.
Even some of Wesley's friends were strangely blinded to a
system that he boldly denounced as the " execrable sum of all
villanies" ; and Whitefield himself, only four years before, had
died the possessor of a large number of human beings,
who, in his will, were classed among his goods and chattels,
and whom he unceremoniously bequeathed to " that elect
lady, the Right Honourable Selina, Countess Dowager of
Huntingdon." Wesley's pamphlet was no sooner issued
than it brought upon him vindictive opposition, in a two
shilling book, entitled "A Supplement to Mr. Wesley's
'Thoughts upon Slavery'"; in which the writer does his
utmost to make the leader of the Methodists ridiculous.
Wesley had counted the cost, and expected this. In America
it was otherwise. There, at Philadelphia, Mr. Anthony
Benezet republished Wesley's tract at his own expense, and
sent to him a friendly salutation, by William Dillwyn, " my
old pupil," says Benezet, "a valuable, religiously minded
person, who is going a voyage to your country" •} and who,
thirteen years afterwards, in 1787, became one of the founders
of the Society for the Suppression of Slavery.
Wesley still continued the publication of his collected
works ; and, in 1774, seven additional volumes were issued,
' Methodist Magazine, 1787, \>. 44.
184 Life and Tifues of Wesley.
1774 making the entire number thirty-two. The last seven, with
Age 71 the exception of three small tracts, consisted exclusively of
his journals, coming down to September i, 1770.
Perhaps there ought to be added another publication, which,
though not printed by Wesley, was his production : " A Ser-
mon preached at the opening of the new Meeting-house at
Wakefield, on the 28th of April, 1774, by the Rev, John
Wesley : taken down in shorthand, at the time of delivery, by
Mr. Williamson, a teacher of that art, and published at the
request of many of the hearers. Leeds : 1774. Sold by all
Booksellers, price threepence." 8vo, 12 pages. The text is
I Corinthians i. 23, 24. The sermon, perhaps properly, has
never been published in any edition of Wesley's works.
Though it contains nothing remarkable, it would enrich the
Methodist Jllagazine, and would be gratefully welcomed by
thousands of readers, who, without a reissue, will never see it.
1775-
ACCORDING to his custom, Wesley spent the first two i775
months of 1775 in London, and in short preaching ex- Age~72
cursions to Northamptonshire and other places.
The nation, at this period, was in a state of the highest
excitement. On February 9, the two houses of parliament
presented an address to King George III., stating that the
British colonists in America had risen in rebellion, and
begging his majesty to " take the most effectual measures to
enforce obedience to the laws and authority of the supreme
legislature." His majesty's reply was affirmative ; and par-
liament was requested to increase both the naval and military
forces.
Wesley was not the man to be silent in great emergencies.
He writes: "Sunday, January 29 — Finding many were
dejected by the threatening posture of public affairs, I strongly
enforced our Lord's words, 'Why are ye fearful, O ye of
little faith .''' " Three weeks later, he preached at the Foundery,
what the Westuiinster Journal described as, " an awful sermon,
on the horrid effects of a civil war " ; observing " that, of all
scourges from God, war was the most to be deprecated, be-
cause it often swept away all traces of religion, and even of
humanity." The text was Daniel iv. 27 : " Let my counsel be
acceptable to thee, and break off thy sins by righteousness,
and thine iniquities by shewing mercy to the poor ; if it may
be a lengthening of thy tranquillity."
Both England and America were terribly excited; but space
prevents our entering into details. Suffice it to say, that the
alleged grievance of the American colonists was their being
taxed, without their consent, by the English parliament. Dr.
Johnson was known to be a great hater as well as a great genius.
" Sir," said he, concerning the miscellaneous and mongrel
colonists across the Atlantic, " Sir, they are a race of convicts,
and ought to be thankful for anything we allow them short of
hanging." No wonder that the English government, already at
1 86 Life and Times of Wesley.
1775 their wits' end, applied to Johnson to assist them with his
Age 72 powerful pen. He did so, by the publication, in 1775, of his
famous pamphlet, entitled, " Taxation no Tyranny; an Answer
to the Resolutions and Address of the American Congress."'
No sooner was it issued, than, with or without leave, Wesley
abridged it, and, without the least reference to its origin,
published it as his own, in a quarto sheet of four pages, with
the title, " A Calm Address to our American Colonies. By
the Rev. Mr. John Wesley, M.A. Price one penny."
This was an injudicious and unwarrantable act, except on
the supposition that there was some secret understanding
between him and Johnson ; and even then the thing had too
much the aspect of plagiarism to be wise, Johnson greatly
reverenced Patty Hall, Wesley's unfortunate sister, and always
treated her as one of his confidential friends. For Wesley
himself he also entertained great respect, and was only vexed
that he was not able to secure more of his company. " John
Wesley's conversation," said he, " is good, but he is never
at leisure. He is always obliged to go at a certain hour.
This is very disagreeable to a man who loves to fold his
legs and have out his talk, as I do."^ There was unques-
tionably a friendship between the two ; and it is possible
that Wesley had Johnson's consent to his publication of the
abridgment of Johnson's pamphlet. In a letter to Wesley,
dated February 6, 1776, Johnson wrote : "I have thanks to
return for the addition of your important suffrage to my
argument on the American question. To have gained such
a mind as yours may justly confirm me in my own opinion.
What effect my paper has had upon the public I know not ;
but I have no reason to be discouraged. The lecturer was
surely in the right who, though he saw his audience slinking
away, refused to quit the chair while Plato stayed."^ This
certainly gives some countenance to the supposition we have
ventured to suggest. Still, there can be no doubt that Wesley
fairly exposed himself to acrimonious attack by publishing
the broc/mre as his own.
Wesley was now one of the most conspicuous men in
^ Boswell's Life of Johnson. ^ Ibid.
^ Gentleman's Magazine, 1797, P- 455-
AmericaJi War of Independence. 187
England ; and, perhaps, no ecclesiastical personage of the 17 75
realm swayed a wider influence over the masses, on qucs- Agey^
tions involving religious interests. Hence, the publication of
his "Calm Address" produced an unparalleled sensation;
and this was the greater, because it was known that, up to
this period, Wesley had sympathised with the colonists rather
than otherwise. Indeed, he had declared five years before, in.
his "Free Thoughts on Public Affairs": "I do not defend
the measures which have been taken with regard to America ;
I doubt whether any man can defend them, either on the
foot of law, equity, or prudence." Of course, Wesley had a
perfect right to change his opinions, which he says he did on
reading Johnson's "Taxation no Tyranny"; but when a
public man like Wesley does that, he can hardly escape
criticism of an unfriendly nature. The world dislikes change-
lings, and hesitates to trust them. Wesley, in the teeth of
former sentiments, now made Johnson's sentiments his
own, contending not only that the English parliament had
power to tax the American colonies, but also that it was
a reasonable thing for the colonists to reimburse the mother
country for some part of the large expense that had been
incurred in defending the colonial rights, and that the whole of
the present agitation was promoted by a few men in England,
who were determined enemies to monarchy, and who wished
to establish a republican form of government, which, of all
others, was the most despotic. The result was, Wesley
was at once pounced upon as a plagiarist and a renegade of
the worst description. Countless pamphlets were published,
only a few of which can be noticed here.
One of his principal antagonists was the Rev\ Caleb
Evans, then a baptist minister at Broadmead, Bristol, and in
the thirty-seventh year of his age, — a man of good sense,
a diligent student, a faithful pastor, and extensively useful ;
but a rampant advocate of what was called liberty, and,
therefore, a well wisher to the republican rebellion across the
Atlantic.
Evans's first publication was " A Letter to the Rev. Mr.
John Wesley, occasioned by his 'Calm Address'" : i2mo, 24
pages. He taunts Wesley with having so suddenly changed
his opinions ; with having, at the late election, advised the
1 88 Life and Times of Wesley.
1775 Bristol Methodists to vote for the ^^ American candidate" ; and
Age~72 ■^vith having, at no remote period, recommended a book en-
titled, "An Argument in Defence of the exclusive right
claimed by the Colonies to tax themselves."
Wesley's reply to this was the republication of his " Calm
Address," with a preface prefixed, in which he acknowledges
that the "Address" was an extract "of the chief arguments
from 'Taxation no Tyranny,'" with "an application" of his
own "to those whom it most concerned." In a page and a
half he answers Evans's objections, and says that all "the
arguments in his tract may be contained in a nutshell."
Another attack on Wesley, which, before the year was out,
reached a second edition, was " A Cool Reply to a Calm
Address, lately published by Mr. John Wesley. By T. S."
l2mo, 33 pages. What this production lacked in argument
it made up in scurrilous inuendo. Wesley is told that his
" religious principles are a species of popery," and that he is
in quest of "a mitre" ; though he "ought to sit in sackcloth
and pour dust upon his head."
Evans also, before the expiration of 1775, issued a new
edition of his letter, l2mo, 32 pages, in the preface to which
he waxes angry, in exposing what he calls " the shameful
versatility and disingenuity of this artful man ;" and does
his utmost to fasten upon Wesley a deliberate falsehood, be-
cause Wesley had denied that he had ever seen the book
which Evans had accused him of recommending, though both
William Pine, his own printer, and the Rev. James Roquet,
his friend, were both prepared to attest on oath that he had
recommended the book to them.
Here then was a direct personal issue between them.
Thomas Olivers, in his " Full Defence of the Rev, John
Wesley," i2mo, 24 pages, published in 1776, gives the expla-
nation. Wesley's denial was not owing to untruthfulness, but
forgetfulness, " Mr. Wesley," says Olivers, " is now an old
man, and yet has such a variety and multiplicity of business
as few men could manage, even in the prime of life. There
are few weeks in which he does not travel two or three hun-
dred miles ; preach and exhort in public between twenty and
thirty times, and often more ; answer thirty or forty letters ;
speak with as many persons in private, concerning things of
American War of Indepoidence. 189
deep importance; and prepare, either in Avhole or in part, 1775
something for the press. Add to all this, that often, in that AtjTya
short space of time, a variety of tracts on different subjects
pass through his hands, particularly as he travels, and that if
any tract does not immediately relate to his office as a divine,
though he may give it a cursory reading, yet he does not
think it necessary to charge his memory with its contents : I
say, when all these things are considered, no one will think it
strange that his memory should often fail."
This was a reasonable explanation of an awkward discre-
pancy ; but Wesley, who was incapable of falsehood, hardly
needed the defence of his ingenious friend Olivers. He had
already written the following to Mr. Roquet himself
"November 12, 1775.
" Dear James, — I will now simply tell you the thing as it is. As I was
returning from the Leeds conference, one gave me the tract which you
refer to, part of which I read on my journey. The spirit of it I observed
to be admirably good; and I then thought the arguments conclusive. In
consequence of which, I suppose, (though I do not remember it,) I re-
commended it both to you and others ; but I had so entirely forgotten it,
that even when it was brought to me the other day, I could not recollect
that I had seen it.
" I am, etc.,
"John Wesley."'
Besides the pamphlets already mentioned, there were pub-
lished, in 1775 : " A Second Answer to Mr. John Wesley. By
W. D." i2mo, 22 pages. Also, "A Wolf in Sheep's Cloath-
ing ; or an Old Jesuit Unmasked. Containing an account of
the wonderful apparition of Father Petre's Ghost, in the form
of the Rev. John Wesley. By Patrick Bull, Esq." i2mo, 24
pages : a vile production in which Wesley is branded as " a
chaplain in ordinary to the Furies, or minister extraordinary
to Bellona, goddess of war ;" and is said to have "solicited to
be made bishop of Quebec;" but who, for "the jacobitical
doctrines contained in his ' Calm Address,' deserves to be
presented, not w^ith laiuii sleeves, but with a Jiempen neckcloth;
and, instead of a mitre, ought to have his head adorned with
a white nightcap drawn over his eyes."
* Ohvers' "Defence," p. 19.
I go Life and Times of Wesley.
1775 Toplady was not likely to allow such an opportunity to pass
Age~72 without embracing it to vent his venom. Hence the publica-
tion of his i2mo tract of 24 pages, entitled, " An Old Fox
Tarr'd and Feather'd"; with a fox's head, in canonicals, for a
frontispiece. The opening sentence is characteristic of the
whole effusion. " Whereunto shall I liken Mr. John Wesley .'
and with what shall I compare him .-* I will liken him unto a
low and puny tadpole in divinity, which proudly seeks to dis-
embowel a high and mighty zvhale in politics!' He then
proceeds to say, that, " both as to matter and expression
Wesley's * Calm Address ' is a bundle of Lilliputian shafts,
picked and stolen out of Dr. Johnson's pincushion. If Mr.
Wesley had the least spark of shame remaining, the simple
detection of such enormous literary theft would be more
terrible to his feelings than an English pumping or an
American tarring and feathering^
Another pamphlet, issued -in the same year, was " A Con-
stitutional Answer to the Rev. Mr, John Wesley's ' Calm Ad-
dress to the American Colonies'": i2mo, 23 pages. The last
sentence is as follows : " As I have formerly seen you, with
pleasure, in the character of a Christian minister, doing some
good in the moral world ; so it is with regret I now see you in
the character of a eonrt syeophant, doing much more mischief
in the political world ; injuring, perhaps irreparably injuring,
your conntry.'^
"Americus," also, in the Gentleman's Magazine} had his
fling against the poor Methodist. One sentence from his
polished quiver must suffice, as a specimen of others : " And
now, Mr. Wesley, I take my leave of you. You have forgot
the precept of your Master, that God and mammon cannot
be served together. You have one eye upon a pension, and
the other upon heaven, — one hand stretched out to the king,
and the other raised up to God. I pray that the first may
reward you, and the last forgive you !"
These extracts might be multiplied almost ad infinitum.
We only add, that Fletcher, as well as Olivers, came to the
defence of Wesley. The former published his " Vindication
of the Rev. Mr. Wesley's ' Calm Address ' : in some Letters to
^ Vol. for 1775, p. 561.
American War of Independence. 191
Mr. Caleb Evans." i2mo, 70 pages. This evoked from Evans 1775
an unworthy acrimonious " Reply," i2mo, 103 pages, in which Age'72
the angry baptist not only rakes up the whole story respect-
ing Wesley, Roquet, and Pine, but finishes by telling the
loving and accomplished Fletcher, that he is " the most ver-
bose, and most unmeaning and unfair disputant, that ever
took up the polemical gauntlet,"
Hampson and Whitehead censure Wesley for turning a
politician. This is a point upon which opinions will differ.
Certain it is, however, that the political part which Wesley
took made him as many enemies as his caveat against Calvin-
ism had done. Within three weeks, forty thousand copies of
his " Calm Address " were printed and put into circulation ;
and excited so much anger among the English friends of the
revolted colonists, that they would willingly have burnt both
him and his Address together. To accuse him of mercenary
motives was an unfounded, base, malignant fabrication. It is
true, that the government were so pleased with his little tract
that copies were ordered to be distributed at the doors of
all the metropolitan churches ; and it is said that one of the
highest officers of state waited upon him, asking whether
government could in any way be of service to either himself or
his people. Wesley replied that he " looked for no favours, and
only desired the continuance of civil and religious privileges."
The nobleman pressed the question, but again received the
same answer. In retiring, he observed : " In all probability,
sir, you have some charities which are dear to you ; by ac-
cepting ;^50 from the privy purse, to appropriate as you may
deem proper, you will give great pleasure to those for whom I
act." This was accepted ; but " Mr. Wesley," says Dr. Clarke,
who related the story, " expressed himself to me as sorry that
he had not requested to be made a royal missionary, and to
have the privilege of preaching in every church. 1 "
This might be true ; but, in conclusion, we must add to it
Wesley's own account, as published at the time, in Lloyd's
Evening Post.
" Sir, — I have been seriously asked, — From what motive did you
piibhsh your ' Calm Address to the American Colonics' .''
' Everett's Life of Dr. A. Clarke.
192 Life and Times of Wesley.
1775 '* ^ seriously answer, Not to get money. Had that been my motive, I
— should have swelled it into a shilling pamphlet, and have entered it at
^^^ ^^ Stationers' Hall.
" Not to get preferment for myself, or my brother's children. I am a
little too old to gape after it myself ; and if my brother or I sought it
for them, we have only to show them to the world.
" Not to please any man living, high or low. I know mankind too
well. I know they that love you for political service, love you less than
their dinner ; and they that hate you, hate you worse than the devil.
" Least of all, did I write with a view to inflame any ; just the contrary.
I contributed my mite toward putting out the flame which rages all over
the land. This I have more opportunity of observing than any other man
in England. I see with pain to what a height this already rises, in every
part of the nation. And I see many pouring oil into the flame, by
crj'ing out, 'How unjustly, how cruelly, the king is using the poor Ameri-
cans ; who are only contending for their liberty, and for their legal
privileges ! '
" Now there is no possible way to put out this flame, or hinder its
rising higher and higher, but to show that the Americans are not
used either cruelly or unjustly ; that they are not injured at all, seeing
they are not contending for liberty, — this they had even in its full extent,
both civil and religious ; neither for any legal privileges, for they enjoy all
that their charters grant. But what they contend for is the illegal privi-
lege of being exempt from parliamentary taxation, — a privilege this which
no charter ever gave to any American colony yet ; which no charter can
give, unless it be confirmed both by king, lords, and commons ; which,
in fact, our colonies never had ; which they never claimed till the present
reign ; and probably they would not have claimed it now, had they not
been incited thereto by letters from England.
" This being the real state of the question, without any colouring or
aggravation, what impartial man can either blame the king, or commend
the Americans ?
" With this view, to quench the fire, by laying the blame where it was
due, the ' Calm Address ' was written.
" As to reviewers, newswriters, London Magazines, and all that kind
of gentlemen, they behave just as I expected they would. And let them
lick up Mr. Toplady's spittle still ; a champion worthy of their cause.
" Sir, I am your humble servant,
"John Wesley."
Thus things proceeded. England was flooded with political
pamphlets; the houses of parliament echoed with the sonor-
ous periods of senatorial oratory; and the hill sides and river
banks of America rang with sharp and dissonant peals of
musketry. Blood had been shed at Lexington ; and, at the
bungling battle at Bunker Hill, the English had lost 1050
men, in killed and wounded. In the month of November,
American War of Independence. 19''
J
Wesley says: "I was desired to preach, in Bethnal Green 1775
church, a charity sermon for the widows and orphans of the Age72
soldiers that were killed in America. Knowing how many
would seek occasion of offence, I wrote down my sermon."
The discourse was immediately published, with the title, " A
Sermon preached at St. Matthew's, Bethnal Green, on Sunday,
November 12, 1775. By John Wesley, M.A. For the benefit
of the widows and orphans of the soldiers who lately fell near
Boston, in New England." 8vo, 33 pages. Wesley speaks
of the terrible distress from which the nation was suffering.
Thousands were totally unemployed. He had seen not a few
(^ them " standing in the streets, with pale looks, hollow eyes,
and meagre limbs." He says, he had " known families, who,
a few years ago, lived in an easy, genteel manner," driven to
the necessity of repairing to the fields " to pick up the turnips
which the cattle had left: and which they boiled, if they could
get a few sticks for that purpose, or otherwise ate them raw."
Thousands had "screamed for liberty till they were utterly
distracted, and their intellects quite confounded." " In every
town, men, who were once of a calm, mild, friendly temper,
were now mad with party zeal, foaming with rage against
their quiet neighbours, ready to tear out one another's throats,
and to plunge their swords into each other's bowels." He
then proceeds to descant, in withering terms, on the sins of
the nation, — money getting, lying, gluttony, idleness, and
profanity. The sermon altogether, considering the time and
circumstances of its delivery, was one of the boldest he ever
preached; and, of course, added to the rage that his "Calm
Address " had kindled. The Gospel Magazine, in reviewing it,
remarks: " So many barrels of tar have of late been lavished
on Mr. Wesley, and so many bags of featJiers have been
shaken over him, on account of his new political apostasy,
that it might seem unmerciful in us, should we add to the
anointings and to the poivderings, which he has already so
plentifully, though not undeservedly, received. We shall
therefore, from a principle of compassion, touch his sermon
with the tenderer hand, and let the sermoniscr himself very
lightly off, the enormity of his demerits considered." And
then the tender reviewer, in his unmerited compassion, pro-
ceeds to describe " the sermon as being as dry as an old piece
VOL. III. O
194 -^{/^ (^^id Times of Wesley.
1775 of leather that has been tanned five thousand times over" ;
Age 72 and the preacher as " a tip-top perfectionist in the art of
lying.". All this revives a recollection of " The Old Fox tarred
and feathered," — and of its polite author, the Rev. Augustus
Toplady, who had just now become the courteous editor of
the misnamed Gospel Magazine.
At the conference of 1774, Wesley had 2204 members of
society in America, and seven itinerant preachers, Messrs.
Rankin, Asbury, Shadford, Williams, King, Dempster, and
Rodda ; and to direct these, in the midst of a great rebellion,
required more than ordinary wisdom. A few extracts from
his letters to Thomas Rankin will not be without interest. »
"London, March i, 1775.
" Dear Tommy, — As soon as possible, you must come to a full and
clear explanation, both with brother Asbury, and with Jemmy Dempster.
But I advise brother Asbury to return to England the first opportunity.
" There is now a probability that God will hear prayer, and turn the
counsels of Ahithophel into foolishness. It is not unlikely that peace will
be reestablished between England and the colonies. But, certainly, the
present doubtful situation of affairs may be improved to the benefit of
many. They may be strongly incited now ' to break off their sins by
repentance, if it may be a lengthening of their tranquillity.'
" I add a line to all the preachers ; —
" Afy Dear Brethren, — You were never in your lives in so critical a
situation as you are at this time. It is your part to be peacemakers ; to
be loving and tender to all; but to addict yourselves to no party. In
spite of all solicitations, of rough or smooth words, say not one word
against one or the other side. Keep yourselves pure : do all you can to
help and soften all ; but beware how you adopt another's jar. See that
you act in full union with each other; this is of the utmost consequence.
Not only let there be no bitterness or anger, but no shyness or coldness,
between you. Mark all those who would set one of you against the other.
Some such will never be wanting. But give them no countenance ; rather
ferret them out, and drag them into open day. The conduct of T.
Rankin has been suitable to the Methodist plan. I hope all of you tread
in his steps. Let your eye be single. Be in peace with each other, and
the God of peace will be with you."
Under the same date, Charles Wesley wrote to Rankin as
follows.
"My dear Brother, — As to public affairs, I wish you to be like-
minded with me. I am of neither side, and yet of both; on the side of
New England, and of Old. Private Christians are excused, exempted,
privileged, to take no part in civil troubles. We love all, and pray for all,
American War of Independence. 195
with a sincere and impartial love. Faults there may be on both sides; 1775
but such as neither you nor I can remedy : therefore, let us, and all our —
children, give ourselves unto prayer, and so stand still and see the salva- "
tion of God."
The war was not the only thing that gave Wesley-
trouble. Thomas Rankin and Francis Asbury were not
able to agree; and Miss Gilbert had actually written to
Asbury, stating that Mr, Gilbert was about to leave An-
tigua; and wishing him to come, and to take charge of
the three hundred Methodists in that island. Asbury was
inclined to accept of this invitation; but was deterred by
his want of ordination, and therefore, as he thought, want
of authority to administer the sacraments of the Christian
church. Wesley wished him to return to England. What
a disaster, if he had!^ These facts will cast light on the
following letters.
" PORTARLINGTON, April 2\, I 775.
" Dear Tommy, — Brother Asbury has sent me a few lines, and I thank
him for them. But I do not advise him to go to Antigua. Let him come
home without delay. If one or two stout, healthy young men would
willingly offer themselves to that service, I should have no objection ; but
none should go, unless he was fully persuaded in his own mind. I am
afraid, you will soon find a day of trial : the clouds are black both over
England and America. It is well if this summer passes over without
some showers of blood. And if the storm once begins in America, it vvill
soon spread to Great Britain.
" I am, dear Tommy, etc.,
"John Wesley."
"Ballinrobe, May 19, 1775.
"Dear Tommy, — I doubt not but brother Asbury and you will part
friends ; I hope I shall see him at the conference. He is quite an upright
man. I apprehend he will go through his work more cheerfully when he
is a little distance from me.
" We must speak the plain truth, wherever we are, whether men will
hear, or whether they will forbear. And among our societies we m.ust
enforce our rules, with all mildness and steadiness.
" Never was there a time, when it was more necessary for all that fiear
God, both in England and in America, to wrestle with God in mighty
prayer. In all the other judgments of God, the inhabitants of the earth
learn righteousness ; but wherever war breaks out, God is forgotten, if
He be not set at open defiance. What a glorious work of God was at
Cambuslang and Kilsyth, from 1740 to 1744 ! But the war that followed
' Asbury"s Journal.
jgS Life and Times of Wesley.
177s tore it all up by the roots, and left scarce any trace of it behind ; inso-
. ' much that, when I diligently inquired a few years after, I could not find
one that retained the life of God ! "
"ClarmaitnT, yufie 13, 1775.
" Dear Tommy, — I am afraid our correspondence, for the time to come,
will be more uncertain than ever, since the sword is drawn ; and it is
well if they have not, on both sides, thrown away the scabbard. What will
the end of these things be, either in Europe or America? It seems, huge
confusion and distress, such as neither we nor our fathers had known ! '
But it is enough, if all issues in glory to God, and peace and goodwill
among men. Never had America such a call to repentance ; for, un-
less general reformation prevent general destruction, what a scene will
soon be opened! Ruin and desolation must soon overspread the land;
and fair houses be turned into ruinous heaps. But what are those
strange phenomena which you speak of .? Send me an account of just
so much as you can depend on. Should you not appoint in America,
as we do in England and Ireland, one or more general days of fasting
and prayer?"
"Near Leeds, yu/y 28, 1775.
"Dear Tommy, — I rejoice to hear that the work of our Lord still
prospers in your hands. If the temple is built even in troublous times, it
is not by the power of man. I rejoice too over honest Francis Asbury,
and hope he will no more enter into temptation. I know no reason why
you should not print the names of the American preachers. You may
print an edition of the * Christian Pattern,' and apply the profits of it to
the payment of the debt. The societies should pay the passage of the
preachers. But you must not imagine, that any more of them will come
to America till these troubles are at an end.
" Certainly, this is the point which we should insist upon, in season
and out of season. The universal corruption of all orders and degrees
of men loudly calls for the vengeance of God ; and, inasmuch as all
other nations are equally corrupt, it seems God will punish us by one
another. What can prevent this, but a universal, or, at least, a general
repentance ? "
" London, August 13, 1775.
" Dear Tommy, — I am not sorry that brother Asbury stays with you
another year. In that time, it will be seen what God will do with North
America ; and you will easily judge whether our preachers are called to
remain any longer therein. If they are, God will make their way plain,
and give them favour even with the men that dehght in war. The clouds
do indeed gather more and more; and it seems a heavy storm will
follow ; certainly it will, unless the prayers of the faithful obtain a
longer reprieve."
^ Words fearfully realised, first in America, next in France, and then
throughout all Europe.
America7i War of Independence. 19/
"London, Ot76'i^6'r 20, 1775. 1775
" Dear Tommy, — I am glad you are going into North Carolina ; and a^7~.
why not into South Carolina too ? I apprehend, those provinces would '^
bear much fruit, as most parts of them are fresh, unbroken ground. And
as the people are further removed from the din of war, they may be more
susceptible of the gospel of peace.
"A paper was sent to me lately, occasioned by the troubles in America ;
but it would not do good. It is abundantly too tart; and nothing of that
kind will be of service now. All parties are already too much sharpened
against each other ; we must pour water, not oil, into the flame. I had
written a little tract ' upon the subject before I knew the American ports
were shut up. I think there is not one sharp word therein ; I did not
design there should. However, many are excessively angry ; and would
willingly burn me and it together. Indeed it is provoking ; I suppose
above forty thousand of them have been printed in three weeks, and still
the demand for them is as great as ever.
" I am entirely of your mind. I am persuaded, love and tender
measures will do far more than violence. And if I should have an
interview with a great man, which seems to be not unlikely, I will tell
him so, without any circumlocution.
" I am, dear Tommy, your affectionate friend and brother,
"John Wesley." 2
The " great man " referred to was probably Lord North,
the prime minister of the English cabinet, to whom, and to the
Earl of Dartmouth, Wesley had, four months before, addressed
most important letters, in which he strongly endeavoured to
convince the government of the exceedingly critical condition
of public matters. No man in the kingdom had suffered
more from the violation of English law than Wesley had ;
and yet now, in England's extremity, no man evinced a more
loyal spirit than was evinced by him. Indeed, his loyalty
became, in the eyes of his enemies, a crime, and brought him,
not reward, but ruffianly reproach. An extract from the
letters to the two ministers of state may fitly, for the present,
close these American reminiscences.
"Armagh, June 15, 1775.
" My Lord, — Whether my writing do any good or no, it need do no
harm ; for it rests with your lordship whether any eye but your own shall
see it.
" 1 do not enter upon the question, whether the Americans are in the
> His " Calm Address."
* Wesley's Works, vol. xii., pp. 302-308.
19S Life and Times of Wesley.
1775 right or in the wrong. Here all my prejudices are against the Americans ;
Age^a ^°'^' ^ ^™ ^ ^^'S^ churchman,' the son of a high churchman, bred up,
from my childhood, in the highest notions of passive obedience and non-
resistance ; and yet, in spite of all my long rooted prejudices, I cannot
avoid thinking, if I think at all, that an oppressed people asked for no-
thing more than their legal rights, and that in the most modest and
inoffensive manner that the nature of the thing would allow.^ But waiving
all considerations of right and wrong, I ask, is it common sense to use
force towards the Americans ? These men will not be frightened ; and it
seems, they will not be conquered so easily as was at first imagined. They
will probably dispute every inch of ground ; and, if they die, die sword in
hand. Indeed, some of our valiant officers say, ' Two thousand men
will clear America of these rebels.' No, nor twenty thousand, be they
rebels or not, nor perhaps treble that number. They are as strong men
as you ; they are as valiant as you, if not abundantly more valiant, for
they are one and all enthusiasts, — enthusiasts for liberty. They are calm,
deliberate enthusiasts; and we know how this principle 'breathes into
softer souls stern love of war, and thirst of vengeance, and contempt of
death.' We know men, animated with this spirit, will leap into a fire, or
rush into a cannon's mouth.
" ' But they have no experience in war.' And how much more have our
troops ? Very few of them ever saw a battle. ' But they have no disci-
pline.' That is an entire mistake. Already they have near as much as
our army, and they will learn more of it every day ; so that, in a
short time, if the fatal occasion continue, they will understand it as well
as their assailants.^ ' But they are divided amongst themselves.' No, my
lord, they are terribly united ; not in the province of New England only,
but down as low as the Jerseys and Pennsylvania. The bulk of the people
are so united, that to speak a word in favour of the present English
measures would almost endanger a man's life. Those who informed me
of this are no sycophants; they say nothing to curry favour ; they have
nothing to gain or lose by me. But they speak with sorrow of heart what
they have seen with their own eyes, and heard with their own ears.
" These men think, one and all, be it right or wrong, that they are con-
tending p7-o aris et focisj for their wi\es, children, and liberty. What an
^ Did Wesley mean this ? That is, did he use it in any sense except
that which immediately follows .''
^ This may seem to clash with the tenor of Wesley's "Calm Address" ;
but the reader must recollect, that it was not until after the date of this
letter that the " Calm Address " was written ; and that Wesley's change
of opinions did not occur until after the Leeds conference of 1775.
Wesley's foresight, throughout the whole of this fearful war, was most
remarkable.
^ It is a remarkable fact, that this letter was written within forty-eight
hours before the disgraceful and disastrous battle at Bunker Hill, where
Wesley's warnings to the premier and colonial secretary of England were
too amply verified. With his itinerants in America, Wesley knew quite
as much of American affairs as Lord North, and perhaps a little more.
Age 72
Amcricaji War of Independence. 199
advantage have they herein over many that fight only for pay! none of 1775
whom care a straw for the cause wherein they are engaged ; most of
whom strongly disapprove of it. Have they not another considerable
advantage ? Is there occasion to recruit troops ? Their supplies are at
hand, and all round about them. Ours are three thousand miles off.
Are we then able to conquer the Americans, suppose they are left
to themselves, suppose all our neighbours should stand stock still, and
leave us and them to fight it out ? But we are not sure of this. Nor
are we sure that all our neighbours will stand stock still. I doubt they
have not promised it ; and, if they had, could we rely upon those pro-
mises ? ' Yet, it is not probable they will send ships or men to
America.' Is there not a shorter way 1 Do they not know where
England and Ireland lie.'' And have they not troops, as well as
ships, in readiness ? All Europe is well apprised of this ; only the
English know nothing of the matter ! What if they find means to land
but two thousand men ? Where are the troops in England or Ireland
to oppose them ? Why, cutting the throats of their brethren in America !
Poor England, in the meantime !
" ' But we have our militia — our valiant, disciplined militia. These will
effectually oppose them.' Give me leave, my lord, to relate a little circum-
stance, of which I was informed by a clergyman who knew the fact. In
1716, alarge body of militia were marching towards Preston against the
rebels. In a wood, which they were passing by, a boy happened to
discharge his fowling piece. The soldiers gave up all for lost, and, by
common consent, threw down their arms, and ran for life. So much
dependence is to be placed on our valorous militia.
" But, my lord, this is not all. We have thousands of enemies, perhaps
more dangerous than French or Spaniards. As I travel four or five thousand
miles every year, I have an opportunity of conversing freely with more
persons of every denomination than any one else in the three kingdoms.
I cannot but know the general disposition of the people, — English, Scots,
and Irish ; and I know a large majority of them are exasperated almost
to madness. Exactly so they were throughout England and Scotland
about the year 1640, and, in a great measure, by the same means ; by
inflammatory papers, which were spread, as they are now, with the utmost
diligence, in every corner of the land. Hereby the bulk of the population
were effectually cured of all love and reverence for the king. So that,
first despising, then hating him, they were just ripe for open rebellion.
And, I assure your lordship, so they are now. They want nothing but a
leader.
"Two circumstances more are deserving to be considered: the one,
that there was, at that time, a decay of general trade almost throughout
the kingdom ; the other, there was a common dearness of provisions.
The case is the same, in both respects, at this day. So that, even now,
there are multitudes of people that, having nothing to do, and nothing to
eat, are ready for the first bidder ; and that, without inquiring into the
merits of the case, would flock to any' that would give them bread.
200 Life and Times of Wesley.
1775 " Upon the whole, I am really sometimes afraid that this evil is from
\ee~72 ^^ Lord. When I consider the astonishing luxury of the rich, and the
shocking impiety of rich and poor, I doubt whether general dissoluteness
of manners does not demand a general visitation. Perhaps the decree
is already gone forth from the Governor of the world. Perhaps even
now :
*As he that buys, surveys a ground.
So the destroying angel measures it around.
Calm he surveys the perishing nation ;
Ruin behind him stalks, and empty desolation.'
"But we Englishmen are too wise to acknowledge that God has any-
thing to do in the world ! Otherwise should we not seek Him by fasting
and prayer, before He lets the lifted thunder drop ? O my lord, if your
lordship can do anything, let it not be wanting ! For God's sake, for the
sake of the king, of the nation, of your lovely family, remember Reho-
boam ! Remember Philip the Second ! Remember King Charles the
First !
" I am, with true regard, my lord, your lordship's obedient servant,
"John Wesley."^
Whatever may be thought of the principle advocated in
Wesley's " Calm Address to the American Colonies," namely,
that taxation without representation is no tyranny, there can
be no doubt that his letters to the premier and to the colonial
secretary are full of warnings and foresight which were terribly
fulfilled ; and, for fidelity, fulness, terseness, in short, for
mnltum in parvo, were perhaps without a parallel in the corre-
spondence of these ministers of state.
Much space has been occupied with these American affairs,
, If an apology were needed, the reader might be courteously
reminded (i) that John Wesley's "Calm Address " threw, not
Methodism only, but the nation, into a fever of excitement,
and, directly and indirectly, gave birth to scores of pamphlets
on the sam^e subject ; (2) that the American rebellion is one of
the greatest events in English history ; and (3) that, in con-
sequence of the great majority of the clergy of the English
Church fleeing from the colonies, when the colonies most
needed them, Methodism, under the sagacious management of
the apostolic Asbury, took the place which had hitherto been
occupied by Anglican episcopacy ; and, henceforth, literally
^Smith's History of Methodism, vol. i., p. 726; and Maanillati's
Magazine for December, 1870.
Death of Peter Bohler. 201
became the predominant religion of what is hkely to be the i775
greatest and most prosperous country in the world. Age 72
We must now return to Wesley in a more private capacity.
The reader has long lost sight of Peter Bohler. In 1739,
after the conversion of the two Wesleys, Bohler went to
Georgia, and his life, since then, had been spent in unwearied
Christian work, partly in America and partly in Europe. His
labours now were nearly ended; and, on April 27, 1775, he
peacefully expired, in London, at the age of sixty-three. For
years past, correspondence seems to have ceased between
Wesley and his early Moravian friend. Within three months
of Bohler's death, it was renewed. Wesley wrote to him on the
5 th of February, and Bohler, in a beautifully Christian letter,
responded. A few days later, Wesley wrote again, as follows.
" Feb}-uary i8, 1775.
" My dear Brother, — When I say, ' I hope I shall never be con-
strained to speak otherwise of them' (the Moravians), I do not mean, that
I have any expectation this will ever happen. Probably it never will. I
never did speak but when I believed it was my duty so to do. And, if they
would calmly consider what I have spoken from March 10, 1736, and
were open to conviction, they might be such Christians as are hardly in
the world besides. I have not lost sight of you yet. Indeed, I cannot, if
you are ' a city set upon a hill.'
" Perhaps no one living is a greater lover of peace, or has laboured more
for it, than I ; particularly, among the children of God.^ I set out, near
fifty years ago, with this principle, 'Whosoever doeth the will of my Father
who is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother.' But
there is no one living that has been more abused for his pains, even to this
day. But it is all well. By the grace of God, I shall go on, following
peace with all men, and loving your Brethren beyond any body of men
upon earth, except the Methodists.
" Wishing you every gospel blessing, I remain your verj'' affectionate
brother,
" John Wesley."^
Thus ended Wesley's intercourse with Bohler, till it was
renewed in heaven.
Eleven days after the above was written, Wesley left
^ These were not empty words, though Wesley was almost perpetually
in war. In an unpublished letter, to Matthew Lowes, dated March 6,
1759, he writes : "What would one not do, except sin, that brotherly
love may continue ! "
"^Methodist Magazine, 1854, p. 691.
202 Life and Times of IVesley.
1775 London for Ireland, proceeding, as usual, by way of Bristol
h^nz and the midland counties. Nothing remarkable occurred
in his journey to Liverpool. Of course, he was preaching
continually, and, winter though it was, sometimes out of
doors. While doing so, at Newcastle under Lyne, " a buf-
foon," he says, " laboured to interrupt him ; but, as he was
bawling, with his mouth wide open, some arch boys gave
him such a mouthful of dirt as quite satisfied him."
At Dublin, at the request of " the good old dean," he
assisted in administering the Lord's supper in St. Patrick's.
At Maryborough, he complied with the wish of the clergy-
man, and preached in the parish church. The Methodist
chapel at Waterford he describes as " a foul, horrid, miser-
able hole." For the first time, he preached at Clones, using,
as his church, an old Danish fort. Here Methodism had been
introduced about the year 1768. The papists were furious,
and magistrates refused to interfere ; but, just when the
place was about to be given up, a military pensioner, an
old presbyterian, took his stand in the centre of the market,
and, shouldering his musket, declared that he would shoot
the first man that attempted to disturb the preacher. The
rioters were frightened ; and the rough old soldier mounted
guard every sabbath afternoon, until opposition ceased.^
At Londonderry, Wesley accepted the bishop's invitation
to dinner ; the prelate remarking, " I know you do not love
our hours, and will therefore order dinner to be on the table
between two and three o'clock." " We had," says Wesley,
" a piece of boiled beef, and an English pudding. This is
true good breeding."
At Castle Caulfield, writes Wesley, with the utmost sang
froid, " the rain came plentifully, through the thatch, into
my lodging room ; but I found no present inconvenience,
and was not careful for the morrow."
Six days afterwards, Wesley was seized with illness, which
nearly proved fatal ; but for three days more, though in a
burning fever, he continued travelling and preaching almost
as usual. He had now reached the town of Lurgan, where,
four years previously, a society had been formed, one of the
' Life of Henry Moore.
Wesley Dangerously III. 203
first members being Isaac Bullock, an old soldier, \vho had 1775
been at the capture of several islands in the West Indies, Age~72
and was one of sixty, called " the forlorn hope," who, in
1762, first entered the breach at the storming of Havan-
nah, only six of the sixty escaping with their lives.
The house of this sturdy veteran was the preaching place
of the Lurgan Methodists.* Here Wesley was obliged to
succumb to fever. He sent for a physician, who told him
he must rest. Wesley replied, he could not, as he " had
appointed to preach at several places, and must preach as
long as he could speak." The doctor gave him medicine,
and off he went to Tanderagee, and then to a gentleman's
seat, three miles beyond Lisburn, where nature sank, and
the conquered evangelist was compelled to take his bed.
Strength, memory, and mind entirely failed. For three
days, he lay more dead than alive. His tongue was black
and swollen. He was violently convulsed. For some time
his pulse was not discernible. Hope was almost gone ; when
Joseph Bradford, his travelling companion, came with a cup,
and said, " Sir, you must take this." Wesley writes : " I
thought, ' I will, if I can swallow, to please him ; for it
will do me neither harm nor good.' Immediately it set
me a vomiting ; my heart began to beat, and my pulse
to play again ; and, from that hour, the extremity of the
symptoms abated." Six days afterwards, to the astonish-
ment of his friends, and, as he says, "trusting in God," he
set out for Dublin, where, within a week, he was preaching
as usual.
This was a memorable epoch, even in Wesley's eventful
life. The house in which he lay so dangerously ill was the
hospitable dwelling of Mr. Gayer, of Derryaghey,^ a devoted
Methodist of great respectability, who had built a chapel in
the village, and, for the accommodation of the preachers,
a room, which went by the name of " the prophet's chamber."
His daughter, afterwards Mrs. W^olfenden, was now a con-
verted girl, sixteen years of age, and, with her mother, was
Wesley's nurse. Great anxiety was felt for Wesley's life,
and, while a few select friends were praying that, as in the
^ Methodist Magazine, 1827, p. 800, ^ Ibid. 1834, p. 413.
204 Life and Times of Wesley.
1775 case of Hezekiah, God would add to his days fifteen years,
Age~72 Mj's. Gayer suddenly rose from her knees, and cried, " The
prayer is granted ! " Marvellously enough, Wesley's recovery
immediately commenced, and he survived, from June 1775
to March 1791, a period of just fifteen years, and a few
months over.
But even this was not all the wonder. Alexander Mather,
at the time, was at Sheerness, in Kent, where he read, in
the newspapers, that Wesley was actually dead, Mather
says, he was not able to give credence to this ; and, before
he went to preach, he opened his Bible on the words,
" Behold, I will add unto thy days fifteen years " (Isa.
xxxviii. 5) ; and away he went to the chapel, and began
to pray that the promise, made to Hezekiah, might be
fulfilled in the case of Wesley.^ These are striking facts.
We give them as we find them. The sceptic will sneer;
but the Christian will exercise an unfaltering faith in the
glorious text, which, in the history of the church, has been
confirmed in instances without number : " The effectual
fervent prayer of a righteous man availeth much."
The news of Wesley's dangerous illness created the
utmost consternation among his friends. The following is
a letter, hitherto unpublished, addressed by Charles Wesley
to Joseph Bradford, Wesley's faithful companion.
"Bristol, June 29, 1775.
" Dear Joseph, — Be of good cheer. The Lord liveth, and all live
to Him. Your last is just arrived, and has cut off all hope of my
brother's recovery. If he could hold out till now, that is, ten days
longer, he might recover; but I dare not allow myself to hope it, till I
hear from you again. The people here, and in London, and every place,
are swallowed up in sorrow. But sorrow and death will soon be
swallowed up in life everlasting. You will be careful of my brother's
papers, etc., till you see his executors. God shall reward your fidelity
and love. I seem scarce separated from him whom I shall so very soon
overtake. We were united in our lives, and in our death not divided.
Brethren, pray a very little longer for your loving servant — CHARLES
Wesley.
" Thursday Evenhig.
"Yours of the 20th, I have this moment received. It only confirms
my fears. My brother, soon after you wrote, in all probability, entered
^ York society book.
Congratulations. 20;
Age 72
into the joy of his Lord. Yet write again, and send me the parti- ^775
culars. I have not, and never more shall have, strength for such a
journey. The Lord prepare us for a speedy removal to our heavenly
country !
" Charles Wesley."
The tidings of Wesley's recovery produced corresponding
joy. His old friend and former itinerant, now the Rev. Dr.
John Jones, of Harwich, wrote to him as follows.
" Harwich, July 29, 1775.
"Reverend and dear Sir, — I cannot express what I felt when I was
informed that you were both senseless and speechless. It was hke life
from the dead when I heard you were out of danger and able to sit up.
It gave me some hope, that God has not yet given up these sinful nations,
and that He will strive with us a little longer. Time was when you would
have taken my advice, at least, in some things. Let me entreat, let me
beseech you, to preach less frequently, and that only at the principal
places. You must be satisfied with directing others, and doing less your-
self. You yourself do not know of how great importance your life is.
Far be it from me to desire you not to travel; I only beg you not to go
beyond your strength.
"John Jones." ^
Another friend, in London, wrote the following.
" London, July 8, 1775.
" Reverend Sir, — God, who comforteth those vv'ho are cast down,
hath comforted us by graciously restoring you to us again. The prayer
of faith has saved the sick. The voice of joy and gladness is now found
in the dwellings of the righteous ; where eight days past there were mourn-
ing, lamentation, and woe. Every social repast was embittered, and we
literally mingled our drink with our tears. Could you, from the bed of
sickness, have cast your eyes on the congregation, the first sabbath in the
month, and beheld distress in every face, keen anguish in every heart,
your generous soul would have been willing to have tarried awhile, absent
from your Lord, to return to comfort those mourners in Sion. The tidings
of your recovery was received with melting gratitude and joyous tears.
O sir, what a week of suspense and anguish ! You will not surely blame
us, that our prayers helped to detain you in the vale below. Forgive
your weeping friends if they have brought you back from the skies;
surely, in the end, you will be amply recompensed ! O yes ! being longer
employed in the work of faith, and labour of love, your crown will be
the brighter." ^
These are specimens of the loving congratulations of
^ Methodist Magazine^ ^7^7) P- 444- * Ibid. 1787, p. 552.
2o6 Life and Times of Wesley.
^775 Wesley's friends.^ His illness was sharp, though short. The
Age 72 only lasting effect was, it stripped him, at all events for
months afterwards, of his beautiful head of hair.^
Having spent three weeks in Dublin, and regained his
strength, he, on July 23, embarked for England, having in the
morning of that day again assisted in administering the Lord's
supper in St. Patrick's cathedral. Landing at Parkgate, he
proceeded to Leeds to meet his conference, preaching, as he
travelled, Avith as much zest as ever ; except that he spent a
day or two at Miss Bosanquet's, making conference prepara-
tions. Notwithstanding the warnings and entreaties of his
friends, his labours were unabated. Referring to his illness
and recovery, he wrote, in 178 1 : " From this time" (1775) "I
have, by the grace of God, gone on in the same track, tra-
velling between four and five thousand miles a year, and,
once in two years, going through Great Britain and Ireland;
which, by the blessing of God, I am as well able to do now
as I was twenty or thirty years ago. About a hundred and
thirty of my fellow labourers are continually employed in the
same thing. We all aim at one point, not at profit, any more
than at ease, or pleasure, or the praise of men ; but to spread
true religion through London, Dublin, Edinburgh, and, as we
are able, through the three kingdoms. This is our point.
We leave every man to enjoy his own opinion, and to use his
own mode of worship, desiring only, that the love of God and
his neighbour be the ruling principle in his heart, and show
itself in his life by a uniform practice of justice, mercy, and
truth. And, accordingly, we give the right hand of fellowship
to every lover of God and man, whatever his opinion or
mode of worship be, of which he is to give an account to God
only." 3
Dr. Jones's advice to Wesley was lost labour. Wesley's life
was a perpetual motion. Work seemed to be essential to its
' A curious i2mo tract, of four pages, was published, with the following
title: " Some Verses, occasioned by the severe Illness, much feared Disso-
lution, and almost miraculous Restoration, of the Rev. Mr. John Wesley, at
Lisburne, in Ireland, July 2, 1775. London: printed for W. Kent, No.
116, High Holborn : 1775." These verses were directed to be sung "to
the tune of ' Oliver's.'"
'^Wesley's Works, vol. xii., p. 469.
® Ibid. vol. xiii., p. 359.
Giving Advice. 207
continuance. There are but few who can sincerely sing the i775
hnes, which he, from his inmost heart, sang so often : Age 72
" Oh that, without a lingering groan,
I may the welcome word receive,
My body with my charge lay down,
And cease at once to work and live /"
Wesley, however, could give advice, though it was not
always that he took it. The following extract from a letter
to his brother, written at this period, contains an example of
this, besides referring to his publishing affairs and the move-
ments of his miserable wife.
"Londonderry, yune 2, 1775.
" Dear Brother, — I thought it strange, that poor Samuel Franks
should leave me ^900 in debt. But it is stranger still, that John Atlay
should have paid ;{^i6oo out of nine; and that I am £160 in debt
notwithstanding !
"Mr. Walthen's method of radical cure I shall hardly try.^ I am very
easy, and that is enough.
" Has my friend taken a house at Bristol ? Is Noah with her ? What
are they doing ?
" Preach as much as you can, and no more than you can. You never
will be much stronger till you add change of air to exercise ; riding two
or three hundred miles point blank forward. Now you have an oppor-
tunity. Meet me at Leeds with honest John Murhn. When you are
tired you may change places with him. You would return a stout, healthy
man.
'' Peace be with you and yours ! Adieu !
"John Wesley." 2
Another instance of advice giving is too racy to be omitted.
The letter was addressed to John King, one of his preachers
in America.
"Near Leeds, July 28, 1775.
"My dear Brother, — Always take advice or reproof as a favour:
it is the surest mark of love.
" I advised you once, and you took it as an affront ; nevertheless I will
do it once more.
" Scream no more, at the peril of your soul. God now warns you by
me, whom He has set over you. Speak as earnestly as you can ; but do
not scream. Speak with all your heart ; but with a moderate voice. It
was said of our Lord, 'He shall not cry' : the word properly means, He
shall not scream. Herein, be a follower of mc, as I am of Christ. I
' The cure of his hydrocele. * Wesley's Works, vol. xii., p. 132.
2o8 Life a7td Times of Wesley.
1775 often speak loud, often vehemently; but I never scream; I never strain
myself, I dare not : I know it would be a sin against God and my own
soul. Perhaps one reason why that good man, Thomas Walsh, yea, and
John Manners too, were in such grievous darkness before they died, was,
because they shortened their own lives.
" O John, pray for an advisable and! teachable temper ! By nature you
are very far from it : you are stubborn and headstrong. Your last letter
was written in a very wrong spirit. If you cannot take advice from
others, surely you might take it from your affectionate brother,
"John Wesley." ^
The above characteristic letter was written at Miss Bosan-
quet's, Cross Hall, Morley, where Wesley had arranged to have
if possible, a few days' retirement, before he met his confer-
ence, at Leeds. In a letter to that lady, dated May 29, 1775,
and therefore previous to his illness, he writes : " The last
day of June, I hope to be in Dublin, and the end of July in
England. If I have a ready passage, probably I may have
an opportunity of hiding myself a day or two with you ; but
I do not desire any of the preachers to come to me till I send
for them. If they do, I shall run away ; I will not be in a
crowd." 2
One or two days' retirement was not much for an old man
to wish ; but it was more than he could get. The preachers
would not be prevented seeing him; and who can blame
them .-• If the magnet attracts the needle, the magnet has no
right to censure the needle for yielding to its own attractive
influence. An extract from an unpublished letter, written, at
this period, by simple hearted, loving Samuel Bardsley, will
illustrate what we mean. " I never was at a better con-
ference. The Lord was with us of a truth. Had you seen us,
and our dear, aged father and friend in the midst of us,
and beheld the freedom and harmony there were among us,
you would have blessed God on our behalf. We seemed to
be determined to live and preach the gospel more than ever.
On the Thursday before the conference began, Mr. Oliver and
I had the pleasure of drinking tea and supping with dear Mr.
Wesley, at Miss Bosanquet's, where we stopped all night. We
were there when he arrived from Ireland, and I need not tell
you with what joy and thankfulness we received the man
* Wesley's Works, vol. xii., p. 309. 2 Yq\^, p. 378.
Calvinian Controversy. 209
of God, and especially as he appeared with his usual cheerful- 1775
ness, and as well as we had seen him for some years. I had a~72
the pleasure of being w^ith him alone, and desired him not to
send me far from home. If he had proposed Worcester to
me, I would have gone ; but, as he did not, I thought it best
to leave it to him w'here to send me ; so he fixed me in this
circuit (Haworth), which I shall love, if I have health, and
live near to God."
The conference at Leeds opened on August i, and con-
cluded its sittings two days afterwards. It was the largest
that had assembled for many years, and was unexampled for
its free discussion.^ Wesley writes: " Having received several
letters, intimating that many of the preachers were utterly
unqualified for the w^ork, having neither grace nor gifts
sufficient for it, I determined to examine the weighty charge
with all possible exactness. In order to this, I read those
letters to all the conference ; and begged, that every one
would freely propose and enforce whatever objection he had
to any one. The objections proposed w^ere considered at
large ; in two or three difficult cases, committees were ap-
pointed for that purpose. In consequence of this, we were all
fully convinced, that the charge advanced was without found-
ation ; that God has really sent those labourers into His
vineyard, and has qualified them for the work ; and we were
all more closely united together than we had been for many
years."
The very day after the conference concluded, Wesley again
set out on his blessed wanderings, and preached at Bradford
and Great Horton. He then took coach to London ; spent
five days there ; and then w^ent off to Wales, Bristol, and
Cornwall ; and got back to London on October 6. The
remainder of the year was spent, partly in the metropolis,
and partly in his usual tours through Bedfordshire, North-
amptonshire, Oxfordshire, Buckinghamshire, Norfolk, Kent,
and Surrey.
The nation was too much excited, in 1775, to take much
interest in the Calvinian controversy ; which, however, still
proceeded. Fletcher published " The Second Part of the
Scripture Scales" : i2mo, 237 pages. Also, "The Last Check
1 Manuscript letter by Thomas Hanby.
VOL. III. P
2 lo Life and Tunes of Wesley.
1775 to Antinomianism. A Polemical Essay on the Twin Doc-
Age~72 trines of Christian Imperfection and a Death Purgatory."
i2mo, 327 pages. Toplady, likewise, issued " The Scheme of
Christian and Philosophical Necessity Asserted ; in opposi-
tion to ]\Ir. John Wesley's Tract on that Subject."
As usual, Toplady excelled in abusiveness. He tells his
readers, that the chief ingredients in Wesley's tract are " an
equal portion. of gross heathenism, Pelagianism, Mahometism,
popery, Manicheanism, ranterism, and antinomianism, culled,
dried, and pulverized, scaindiini artem; and, above all, mingled
with as much palpable atheism as could be possibly scraped
together." Wesley is taunted as a " poor gentleman, who is
necessarily an universal meddler ; and, as necessarily, an
universal miscarrier." " He paddles in metaphysics, knows a
little, presumes a great deal, and so jumps to conclusions."
His " Thoughts on Necessity " are " as crude and dark as
chaos."
This scurrility was a thing to which Wesley had been long
accustomed. It was cast upon him by writers of all descrip-
tions. In this same year, 1775, an octavo pamphlet of 35
pages was published, with the title, " A Letter to a Friend
on the Subject of Methodism ; " in which the anonymous
writer, among a multitude of other calumnies, declares that the
tendency of Wesley's system is " to fill parishes with whores,
rogues, and bastards"; and defines Methodist preaching as
" a ridiculous effusion, delivered with an enthusiastic air, a
distorted countenance, a whining, snivelling accent, and a
soporific, nasal twang." Wesley had too much of a gentle-
man's self respect to even notice vulgarities like these ; and
yet they were far from being pleasant, and tend to show that
Methodism struggled into its mighty manhood amid the
incessant peltings of every kind of pitiless persecution. The
storm, during Wesley's lifetime, from one quarter or another,
was perpetual ; but, powerless to destroy, it simply made the
roots of the tree strike deeper.
Two of Wesley's publications, in 1775, have been already
noticed. The others were :
1. "A Sermon on i John v. 7." Dublin: i2mo, 31 pages.
2. "The Important Question. A Sermon, preached in
Taunton, on September 12, 1775. Published at the Request
William Pine. 2 1 1
of many of the Hearers, for the Benefit of a Public Charity." i775
i2mo, 33 pages. This sermon was delivered in the presby- Age 72
terian chapel, and was made the means of converting Mrs.
Stone, in whose house Dr. Coke, shortly after, met Wesley's
preachers, to confer with them about his religious scruples ;
and where he preached his first sermon outside the precincts
of a parish church.^
3. "A Concise History of England, from the earliest times
to the death of George H." i2mo, 4 vols. Price, to sub-
scribers, half a guinea. Wesley says, his " volumes contain
the substance of the English history, extracted chiefly from
Dr. Goldsmith, Rapin, and Smollett ; only with various
corrections and additions." Wesley made a profit of ^200 by
this publication ; but gave it all away the week he got it.^
For many years, William Pine of Bristol had been Wesley's
chief printer and publisher, and had recently brought out a
revised edition of Wesley's collected works, in thirty-two
i2mo volumes. Henceforth, the connection ceased. Pine
became a red hot partisan of the rebellious colonists. Wesley
disliked this, and wrote as follows to his brother Charles.
" Leeds, July -^i, 1775.
" Dear Brother, — I must not delay answering your important
question, 'What can be done with Wilham Pine?' If he still, after my
earnest warning, ' every week publishes barefaced treason,' I beg you
would once more warn him, in my name and in your own ; and if he
slights or forgets this warning, then give him his choice, either to leave us
quietly, or to be publicly disowned. At such a time as this, when our
foreign enemies are hovering over us, and our own nation is all in a
ferment, it is particularly improper to say one word which tends to inflame
the minds of the people." ^
Thus Wesley's loyalty to King George severed his connec-
tion with William Pine, the weekly publisher of the once
popular Felix Farley s Journal. ]\Ir. Pine died in 1803.'*
^ Methodist Magazine, 1824, p. 568. 2 n^j^^^ jg^-^ p_ jj^s.
^ Wesley's W^orks, vol. xii., p. 133.
* J. Pawson's manuscript letter.
1776.
^77^ ^T TESLEY'S first act, in 1776, was to join with ' eighteen
Age 73 V V hundred London Methodists in renewing his covenant
with God. His next was to go to Bristol, partly to bury his
brother-in-law, poor Westley Hall ; and partly to restrain some
of the Bristol Methodists, who were in danger of turning
republicans.
The health of Fletcher of Madeley being seriously affected
by a violent cough, accompanied by spitting of blood, Wesley
believed nothing was so likely to restore his health as a
long journey. " I therefore," says he, " proposed his taking
a journey of some months with me, through various parts of
England and Scotland ; telling him, * when you are tired, or
like it best, you may come into my carriage ; but remember
that riding on horseback is the best of all exercises for you,
so far as your strength will permit.' "^
Wesley proposed not only this, but more than this, as is
evident from Fletcher's answer, hitherto unpublished.
" Madeley, January 9, 1 776.
"Reverend and dear Sir, — I received last night the favour of yours
from Bristol My grand desire is to be just what the Lord would have me
be. I could, if you wanted a travelling assistant, accompany you, as my
little strength would admit, in some of your excursions ; but your recom-
mending me to the societies, as one who might succeed you, (should the
Lord call you hence before me,) is a step to which I could by no means
consent. It would make me take my horse and gallop away. Besides,
such a step would, at this juncture, be, I think, peculiarly improper, and
would cast upon my vindication of your minutes such an odium as the
Calvinists have endeavoured to cast upon your ' Address.' It would make
people suspect, that what I have done for truth and conscience sake, I have
done with a view of being, what Mr. Toplady calls, ' the bishop of Moor-
fields.' We ought to give as little hold to the evil surmising and rash
judgments of our opponents as may be. If, nevertheless. Providence
throws in your way a clergyman willing to assist us, it would be well to fall
in with that circumstance.
^ Wesley's Works, vol. xi,, p. 290.
Age 73
Fletcher travelling with Wesley. 213
"I sent to you in London, by the last post, a manuscript entitled, 1776
' A Second Check to Civil Antinomianism,' being an extract from the
' Homily against Rebellion,' which I think might be spread at this time
to shame Mr. Roquet, and to calm the people's mind. Whether it is
worth publishing you will see. I suppose it will make a threepenny tract.
" What has made me glut our friends with my books is not my love to
such publications ; but a desire to make an end of the controversy. It is
possible, however, that my design has miscarried, and that I have disgusted,
rather than convinced, the people. I agree with you, sir, that now is the
time to pray, — both for ourselves and our king, — for the Church of Eng-
land and that part of it which is called the Methodists. I cast my mite
of supplication into the general treasure. The Lord guide, support, and
strengthen you more and more unto the end !
" I am, reverend and dear sir, your affectionate son and servant in the
gospel,
"John Fletcher."'
Fletcher had overtaxed nature. His day of activity was
comparatively over. True, he lived nine years longer ; but, for
two years, he lived in retirement with his friends, Mr. Green-
wood at Newington, and Mr. Ireland of Bristol, with the
exception of the time he spent in travelling with Wesley in
quest of health ; and upwards of three years more were spent
in Switzerland ; when, returning to England, he was married,
on November 12, 1781, to Miss Bosanquet, and died on August
14, 1785.
Wesley writes : " He looked upon my proposal as a call
from Providence, and willingly accepted it. He set out, (as I
am accustomed to do,) early in the spring of 1776, and tra-
velled, by moderate journeys, suited to his strength, which
gradually increased, eleven or twelve hundred miles. When
we returned to London, in the latter end of the year, he was
considerably better. And, I verily believe, if he had travelled
with me, partly in the chaise and partly on horseback, only a
few months longer, he would quite have recovered his health.
But this those about him would not permit ; so, being detained
in London by his kind, but injudicious, friends, while I pursued
my journeys, his spitting of blood, with all the other symptoms,
returned, and rapidly increased, till the physician pronounced
l-.im to be far advanced in pulmonary consumption." ^
' Manuscript letter.
2 Wesley's Works, vol. xi., p. 290.
214 L^f^ (If id Times of Wesley.
1^6 No doubt, Wesley wished to have Fletcher as his coadjutor
Age 12) 'i"d successor ; but Providence determined otherwise. Fletcher
had a great work to do, and did it ; but it was not ordained
that Fletcher should take Wesley's place.
It is a remarkable coincidence, that, in the very year when
the health of Fletcher failed, Wesley formed an acquaintance
with Thomas Coke. Born and educated at Brecon, Coke was
now twenty-nine years of age. He had taken his degrees
at Oxford, had received episcopal ordination, and, at present,
was curate at South Petherton. Mr. Brown, a clergyman near
Taunton, lent him the sermons and journals of Wesley, and
the "Checks" of Fletcher. In the month of August, 1776,
Wesley was Mr. Brown's guest at Kingston, and Coke went
to see him. Wesley writes : " 1776, August 13 — I preached
at Taunton, and afterwards went with Mr, Brown to Kingston.
Here I found a clergyman. Dr. Coke, late a gentleman com-
moner of Jesus college, Oxford, who came twenty miles on
purpose to meet me. I had much conversation with him ; and
a union then began, which, I trust, shall never end." The
doctor expressed his doubts respecting the propriety of con-
fining himself to one congregation. Wesley clasped his hands,
and, in a manner peculiarly his own, said : " Brother, go out,
go out, and preach the gospel to all the world ! "^ Coke rode
back to Petherton pensive, and yet consoled. The tone of his
ministry was now more decided than ever. The parish was
remodelled, so to speak, into a circuit. On Sundays, after the
second lesson, he would read a paper of his appointments for
the ensuing week, with the place and time of service. His
innovations, in preaching in cottages and barns, took a sort of
Methodistic form, by being systematically arranged. The
disgust of his opponents in the parish became intense ; and,
toprevent his having the opportunity of preaching a farewell
sermon, his rector, without any previous notice, at the close
of a public service, and in the presence of a listening con-
gregation, abruptly announced that Coke was now dis-
missed. The die was cast. Coke attended Wesley's conference
in Bristol, and, on August 19, 1777, Wesley writes: "I
went to Taunton with Dr. Coke, who, being dismissed from
"^ Methodist Magazine, 1824, p. 568.
Enforcing Disciplme. 215
his curacy, has bid adieu to his honourable name, and
determined to cast in his lot with us," Henceforth, Thomas
Coke was a Methodist itinerant preacher, and became the
great organiser of Methodist missions in other lands.
When Wesley enacted rules, he meant them to be
observed. Laxity in the enforcement of discipline was to
him a thing intolerable. He was a thorough disciplinarian
himself, and insisted that his preachers should copy his
example. Good as were the first Methodists, they were
not perfect. Then, as now, some were defective in their
attendance at the weekly class. In certain instances, as we
have already seen, some were guilty of the crime of smug-
gling. Others, in moderation, were addicted to taking drams,
and others opium ; and it often happened that the oldest
societies were the worst offenders. In 1776, both London
and Newcastle were thus tainted ; and Wesley was deter-
mined, with a strong hand, to purge them. Hence the
following extracts from letters, addressed, at this period, to
Joseph Benson, stationed at Newcastle.
"We must threaten no longer, but perform. In November last, I
told the London society, ' Our rule is, to meet a class once a week ; not
once in two or three. I now give you warning: I will give tickets to
none in February, but those that have done this.' I have stood to my
word. Go you and do likewise, wherever you visit the classes. Begin,
if need be, at Newcastle, and go on at Sunderland. Promises to meet
are now out of date. Those, that have not met seven times in the
quarter, exclude. Read their names in the society ; and inform them
all, you will the next quarter exclude all that have not met twelve times ;
that is, unless they were hindered by distance, sickness, or by some
unavoidable business. And I pray, without fear or favour, remove
the leaders, whether of classes or bands, who do not watch over the souls
committed to their care ' as those that must give account.' "
What would become of Methodist societies if these
imperative directions of Methodism's founder were enforced
now .''
Benson had expelled a smuggler, and Wesley wrote :
" You did right in excluding from our society so notorious an offender.
You have now a providential call to stand in the gap between the living
and the dead. Fear nothing. Begin in the name of God, and go through
with it. If only six will promise you to sin no more, leave only six in
society. But my belief is, a hundred and fifty are now clear of blame ;
and, if you are steady, a hundred more will amend. You must, at all
Age 73
2i6 Lif^ ci^id Times of Wesley.
1776 events, tear up this evil by the roots. The ' Word to a Smuggler' should
be read and dispersed. And secure your fellow labourers, that you may
all speak one thing. Go on, for God is v.ith you ! Not only the as-
sistant, but every preacher, is concerned to see all our rules observed.
I desire brother Rhodes will give no tickets, either to those who have
not constantly met their classes, or to any that do not solemnly promise
to deal in stolen goods no more. He and you together may put a stop
to this ciying sin. If any leader oppose, you see your remedy; put
another in his place. Nay, if he does not join heart and hand ; for ' he
that gathereth not with you scattereth.' The 'Word to a Smuggler' is
plain and home, and has done much good in Kent. Taking opium is
full as bad as taking drams. It equally hurts the understanding, and is,
,if possible, more pernicious to the health, than even rum or brandy.
None should touch it, if they have the least regard either for their souls
or bodies." ^
The year 1776 was a period of great national distress ;
and, yet, it was now that Wesley started his scheme for
the erection of Methodism's cathedral, the chapel in City
Road. Who will write a history of London Methodism .-'
or, which would be more popular, who will give the
Methodists a monograph of the memories of Wesley's "new
chapel " in City Road .'' Much might be said of the epi-
scopal chapel in West Street, Seven Dials, of which Wesley
obtained a lease, and which he opened on the 29th of
May, 1743, as a Methodist meeting-house, and which was so
occupied until 1 798, when it was superseded by the purchase
of another episcopal chapel, which then stood on part of the
site of the present Methodist chapel in Great Queen Street.^
Then there was the venerable chapel in Spitalfields, erected
by the French protestants, and used by Wesley long before
that in City Road was built, but which, horresco refcrcns ! has
given place to the brewery of Truman, Hanbury & Co. ; and
there is likewise its successor, also originally a French protest-
ant church, and still used for Methodist services, a chapel
which has recently had dark days of adversity, but which is
rich in religious memories, and has witnessed many a marvel-
lous revival of the work of God. There is Chelsea, whose
first Methodist meeting place was an upper room in the house
of an elderly woman, Mrs. Day, who resided in Royal Hospital
' Wesley's Works, vol. xii., pp. 395-397.
- Methodist Magazine, 1845, p. 522.
MetJiodlsm in London. ' 217
Row; and its next, one of the dancing rooms in the celebrated i??*^
Ranelagh Gardens, for which a rent was paid of ten guineas per j^^^ -3
annum; and in Avhich Wesley preached only about two months
previous to his death, taking as his text words which his long
life had illustrated: "The king's business requires haste." ^
There is Lambeth, where, in 1772, good old John Edwards
opened his house for preaching ; and then converted an adjoin-
ing building into a decent chapel ; a man of vigorous mind,
retentive memory, and fluent speech ; for almost forty
years an effective local preacher, and who, while on a
preaching expedition, died at Irchester, in the county of
Northampton, in 1803.^ In London East, there was the
old chapel in Gravel Lane, which, in 181 1, was required
for the London Docks ; and its successor in Back Road,
required by the Black wall railway company.^ There was
the schoolroom near Mill Pond Bridge, Rotherhithe, suc-
ceeded by the purchased chapel in Albion Street.* There
was Hoxton chapel, which originally belonged to the Dis-
senters ; and there were the venerable meeting-houses at
Wapping, Snowsfields, Peckham, and other places. All
these have a history well worth writing, to say nothing of
the parent of them all, the old pantile Foundery, Method-
ism's honoured cradle ; and of which the Methodists retained
possession, at least as late as the year 1785, when they re-
ceived for it, in the shape of rent, £14. per year/
Then how rich the mine of London Methodist biogra-
phy ! Confining ourselves to Wesley's days, there is — Mary
Cheesebrook, originally a kept mistress, converted in West
Street chapel, never absent from the Foundery preaching,
though, to be in time, she often had to run the distance, and
who, every Saturday, after paying her little debts, gave away
all the money she had left, leaving the morrow to take thought
for the things of itself: — ]\Irs. Witham, a mother in Israel,
an eminent pattern of calm boldness for the truth, of sim-
plicity and godly sincerity, of unwearied constancy in
attending all the ordinances of God, of zeal for God and
^ Methodist Maf^azine, 1830, p. 310. - Ibid. 1803, p, 289.
2 Ibid. 1847, p. 102. ■* Ibid. i8i6, p. 446.
* City Road society book.
2i8 Life and Times of Wesley.
^770 for all good works, and of self denial in every kind: —
Age 73 Elizabeth Langdon, whose trials were severe, and her death
tranquil : — Hannah Lee, a model of industry, meekness, and
patience : — Mary Naylor, distinguished for her Christian
courage, and plainness of speech and of apparel : — Thomas
Salmon, a good and useful man : — Joseph Norbury, a faithful
witness of Jesus Christ : — William Hurd, a son of affliction,
whose end was peace : — John Matthews, who, for some
months before his death, was wont to say, " I have no more
doubt of being in heaven, than if I was there already " ; and
of whom Wesley writes : "A man of so faultless a behaviour I
have hardly ever been acquainted with. During twenty years,
I do not remember his doing or saying anything which I
would wish to have been unsaid or undone": — Ann Wheeler,
who, twenty-five years before her death, while attending
preaching in Moorfields, was struck in the forehead with a
stone, the mark of which her unborn daughter bore to her
dying day : — Rebecca Mills, always firm and unmoved, rest-
ing on the Rock of ages, and in life and death uniformly
praising the God of her salvation : — Elizabeth Duchesne, for
near forty years zealous of good works, and who shortened
her days by labouring for the poor beyond her strength : —
William Osgood, a good man, who began life in poverty,
but increased more and more till he was worth several
thousand pounds : — Michael Hayes, who lived above a
hundred and four years, mostly in vigorous health, and
as he lived, so died, praising God : — Mrs. Kiteley, a perfect
pattern of true womanhood, a good wife, a good parent, a
good mistress, who, after many years of active benevolence,
redeemed a poor friendless youth from prison, took the
jail distemper, and died : — Heller Tanner, diligent, patient,
loving to every man, and zealous of good works : — Bilhah
Aspernell, who, for six-and-thirty years, without intermission,
walked in the light of God's countenance, was always in pain,
yet always rejoicing, and going about doing good ; who
on Sunday evening met her class as usual, and the next day
sent for her old fellow traveller, Sarah Clay, and said to her,
* Sally, I am going." " Where are you going .'*" She cheer-
fully answered, "To my Jesus, to be sure!" and spoke no
more : — Thomas Vokins, a man of a sorrowful spirit, who
MetJiodism in London. 219
always hung down his head hke a bulrush, but who died 1776
triumphing over pain and death, and rejoicing with joy full a^73
of glory : — Mr. Bespham. many years master of a man of war, ^
whose faith was full of mercy and good fruits: — George
Parsons, a flame of fire wherever he went, losing no occasion
of speaking or working for God ; so zealously, so humbly,
so unreservedly devoted to God, that few like him were left
behind him : — Eleanor Lee, who lived in the enjoyment of
perfect love for sixteen years, and of whom Wesley testified,
" I never saw her do any action, little or great, nor heard
her speak any word, which I could reprove": — Ann Thwayte,
a woman of faith and prayer, for whom Wesley preached
a funeral sermon : — Merchant West, a pattern of diligence
in all things, spiritual and temporal : — Charles Greenwood,
a melancholy man, full of doubts and fears, but who, two
days before he died, was made so unspeakably happy
that he exclaimed, " God has revealed to me things which
it is impossible for man to utter": — George Hufflct, for
many years a burning and shining light : — Ann Sharland,
whose cancer in her breast caused her continual pain, but
who triumphed gloriously through Christ ; — and Robert
Windsor, prudent, serious, diligent, full of mercy and good
fruits.
All these died during Wesley's lifetime. The temptation
to add to them is great. We should like to tell of William
Palmer, Wesley's first classleader in London; and of his son,
who was blind from infancy, was one of the first to form the
Community, or body of workhouse visitors, often made
preaching excursions into different parts of the country, with
Wesley's sanction, and died in 1822, after being sixty-two
years a Methodist.^ Old Thomas Gibbs of Lambeth, also,
deserves a place in Methodism's gallery, — a patriarch, who
lived to the age of one hundred and four years, eighty-three
of which he had been a member of Wesley's society; and
who, at his death, in 1827, was probably the oldest Methodist
in the world.^ There is Isaac Andrews, one of the original
subscribers to City Road chapel, a man of unimpeachable
Christian character, a Methodist of sixty years' standing, who
1 Methodist Magazine, 1823, p. 202. ^ \\;^^^^ 1827, p. 430.
2 20 Life and Times of Wesley.
1776 died at the age of eighty-two, in 1832.^ There is Mrs.
^Vrre 73 Maddan, whose mother, Mrs. Varin, was the eighth person
whom Wesley received into church fellowship, when forming
his infant society in Fetter Lane. There are Mrs. Mortimer
and Mrs. Bruce, of whom the Rev. Richard Watson used to
say, "they were the t\vo finest specimens of primitive Method-
ism that he knew;" the latter being the daughter of parents
who were among the eighteen persons who first joined
Wesley in Christian fellowship, in 1739.^ We cannot find
room for more.
For five-and-thirty years, Wesley and his friends had wor-
shipped in "the old Foundery." Here hundreds, perhaps
thousands, had been converted; but, as the building was only
held on lease, they were now in danger of losing it. On
October 19, 1775, Wesley, writing to his brother, says: "on
Friday I hope to be in London, and to talk with the com-
mittee about building a new Foundery." ^ A few months later,
he wrote again: " 1776, March i — As we cannot depend on
having the Foundery long, we met to consult about building
a new chapel. Our petition to the city for a piece of ground
lies before their committee; but when we shall get any fur-
ther, I know not: so I determined to begin my circuit as
usual; but promised to return whenever I should receive
notice that our petition was granted." Exactly five months
after this, Wesley started the first subscription, and, at three
meetings, raised upwards of ^^lOOO. In November following,
building plans were agreed upon; in April 1777, Wesley laid
the foundation stone; and on Sunday, November i, 1778, he
opened his new sanctuary, by preaching, in the morning, on
part of Solomon's prayer at the dedication of the temple ;
and in the afternoon, on the hundred, forty and four thousand
standing with the Lamb on mount Zion. He writes: "It is
perfectly neat, but not fine; and contains far more people
than the Foundery : I believe, together with the morning
chapel, as many as the Tabernacle."
The chapel in City Road will always stand as a thanks-
giving monument, raised, not by the London Methodists
* Methodist Magazine, 1832, p. 466. ^ Ibid. 1837, p. 399.
^ Wesley's Works, vol. xii., p. 134.
MctJwdism in London. 221
merely, but by Methodists throughout the three kingdoms. 1776
No sooner was it resolved to build, than Wesley issued the fol- ^"7,
lowing circular, an original copy of which now lies before us.
" Octoberi%, iTj6.
" My dear Brother, — The society at London have given assistance
to their brethren in various parts of England. They have done this for
upwards of thirty years: they have done it cheerfully and liberally.
The first year of the subscription for the general debt, they subscribed
above nine hundred pounds; the next, above three hundred; and not
much less every one of the ensuing years.
" They now stand in need of assistance themselves. They are under a
necessity of building; as the Foitndery, with all the adjoining houses, is
shortly to be pulled down. And the city of London has granted ground
to build on; but on condition of covering it, and with large houses in
front, which, together with the new chapel, will, at a very moderate com-
putation, cost upwards of six thousand pounds. I must, therefore, beg
the assistance of all our brethren. A^otu help the parent society, which
has helped others, for so many years, so willingly and so largely. Now
help me, who account this as a kindness done to myself; perhaps, the
last of this sort which I shall ask of you. Subscribe what you conveni-
ently can, to be paid either now, or at Christmas, or at Ladyday next.
" I am, your affectionate brother,
"John Wesley.
John Duplex,
Charles Greenwood,
Richard Kemp,
" The Trustees are ■{ Samuel Chancellor,
Charles Wheeler,
WILLLA.M Cowland,
^ John Folgham."
We are afraid to enter into details, respecting the New
Chapel, in City Road. John Pawson, who was appointed to the
office of assistant in the London circuit, within two years after
the chapel was opened, tells us, in an unpublished manuscript,
that the plan proposed was to build an elegant chapel, such
as even the lord mayor might attend, without any diminishing
of his official dignity; and that it should be 7t'//^//y supplied by
ordained clergymen of the Established Church on Sundays,
when the liturgy should be constantly read at both morning
and evening service; and this, for a considerable time after the
chapel was opened, was regularly done. No layman, so
called, — that is, no itinerant preacher not episcopally or-
dained, was allowed to officiate within its walls, except on
222 Life and Times of Wesley.
1776 week days. Charles Wesley, Thomas Coke, and John
Age 73 Richardson were City Road's only sabbatic priests: Pawson,
Jaco, Rankin, Tennent, Olivers, and others, though better
preachers than any of the trio, were not admitted; because
their heads had not been touched by a bishop's fingers.
Pawson says, that Richardson and Coke disapproved of this
arrangement; but Charles Wesley persisted, until the congre-
gations so fell off, and the society was thrown into such con-
fusion, that the trustees of the chapel met, and waited on
Charles Wesley with a request, that he would not preach so
often at City Road, but would go sometimes to West Street
on Sundays, and allow the itinerants to take his place on the
hitherto forbidden ground. Cliarles reluctantly submitted;
but wrote to his brother, casting all the blame upon the poor,
tabooed itinerants, and stating that it was wholly owing to
their deep rooted prejudices against the clergy of the Estab-
lished Church, that these events had happened.
For many years, the men sat on one side the chapel, and
the women on the other ; and, besides this, there was another
usage, which would not be popular at the present day : all the
pews and seats were open. Large numbers paid for seats;
but no on-e was allowed to call a seat, or a pew, his own. In
1788, the trustees endeavoured to, make an alteration in both
the respects just mentioned; "thus overthrowing," says
Wesley, " at one blow, the discipline which I have been
establishing for fifty years!" He continues, however: "we
had another meeting of the committee; who, after a calm and
loving consultation, judged it best — (i) that the men and
women should sit separate still; and (2) that none should
claim any pew as his own, either in the new chapel, or in
West Street."
The days of the old Foundery have long been ended ; the
"New Chapel" in City Road still stands, and we trust will
ever stand, by far the most sacred and attractive edifice in
the Methodistic world. Not for a hundred pretentious gothic
structures would Methodists of the olden type give up this.
Though its ceiling may be somewhat low, yet, taken as a
whole, its architecture, for neatness, and commodiousness,
and solidity, has been but rarely equalled, by the more
pretentious Methodist buildings of the present day. We
Meihodisfji in London. 22
J
are weary of gothic gaudiness, sacrificing the interests of the 1776
church of God to the pride of showy architects, and the Age 73
mediaeval whims of Methodists in danger of relapsing into
mediaeval darkness. Let the present race of Methodists have
wisdom and modesty enough to build their chapels accord-
ing to the plan adopted by a man, in all respects, their
superior — Methodism's founder. Hail to old City Road !
When we think of the ministers who have occupied its
pulpit, of the families who have filled its pews, of the
dead resting in graves round about rfts walls, and of the
interesting events which make up its story, — we feel that
of all the Methodist meeting-houses in existence, gothic
or otherwise, marble or mudden, there is not one to equal
this.
For many a long year, the chapel in City Road was the
head of London Methodism; and, though there are now more
than twenty heads, all owe a respectful obeisance to this. Its
circuit plan, from June 17 to September 23, 1792, eighteen
inches broad and fifteen deep, is simply headed, " A Plan for
the Preachers in London ; " the word Methodist, or Method-
ism, not being printed in any part of it. The preaching
places, and hours of preaching, are as follows: — New Chapel,
9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ; West Street, 9, 3 and 7 ; Spitalfields,
10 and 3 ; Wapping, 10 and 5 ; Snowsfields, 10 and 5 ;
Lambeth, 6 ; Westminster, 5 ; Peckham, 3 ; Rotherhithe,
10 and 5 ; Deptford, 7, 10, and 5 ; Chelsea, 6; Brentford, 10, 2,
and 6 ; Dorking, ii, 2, and 5 ; Raynham, 10 and 5 ; Purfleet, 9
and 5 ; Woolwich, 2 and 6 ; Wandsworth, 6; Mitcham, 2 and
6 ; Croydon, 2 and 6 ; Bromley, 3 ; Barnet, 2 and 5 ; Poplar,
1 1 and 5 ; Bow, 5 ; Stratford, 1 1 and 5 ; Barking, 5 ; Leyton,
5 ; Grosvenor Market, 6 ; Ratclifif Cross, 2 ; Christ Church, 5 ;
Clerkenwell, 6 ; Kentish Town, 6 ; and Seven Dials without
an hour. Such was London circuit at the time when Wesley
died.
Interesting citations might be made from the old City Road
society book, extending from August 23, 1784, to July 9, iSoo.
We learn, that sacramental collections were, upon an average, a
little more than £t^ each ; and monthly collections, for " the
furtherance of the gospel," about £,6 los. The sacrament was
administered once a week ; and what is now known among
2 24 L'^f^ (^^^d Times of Wesley.
177^ the Methodists as a quarterly collection was then made once a
Age 73 nionth as just referred to. The entire circuit income, for 1786,
was £^62 \6s. ^d., which included sacramental collections and
payments for graves, all of which were then appropriated to
circuit purposes. Strangely enough, there is no entry of class
moneys till 1788, from which time such entries were regularly
made. Had the practice of collecting pence weekly in the
classes been superseded by collections made at the weekly
sacraments.'' This is not improbable; for, from the time when
class moneys are ente}:ed as a part of the circuit income, the
entries of sacramental collections, and collections for the
furtherance of the gospel, cease. For the year 1787, including
all sources of income, the average contribution per member per
year was in this great London circuit 3^". \0\d., or less than
a shilling per member per quarter. How far was this from the
requirement of Wesley's rules ? Who will say that the former
days were better than these .'' Besides, all that was con-
tributed was not current coin ; for in the same year there is a
charge deducted of not less than £,\o 14$". 9i^. for bad money
given at collections.
Many are the curious items in the list of circuit payments
and allowances. The yearly salary paid to Wesley was ^^30 ;
to his brother £60; to Creighton, £6^ ; to Dickenson, ^50;
to Coke, £z^\ while the quarterage to the itinerants, and to
their wives respectively, was ;^3 each. With a few more
extracts we conclude this lengthened notice of London
Methodism, during the last seven years of Wesley's life.
" 1784: November 7, a new pail, half a crown ; December 6,
chain for dog, two shillings. 1785 : January 4, shaving the
preachers, £2 \os. 6d. ; February 18, "news pappers," 13^. ;
May 18, lamplighter, four weeks, 6s. ; August 8, Mr. Tennant,
to pay his debts, and to send him to Leeds, £() C)S. ; August 13,
letters, four weeks, £2 I'^s. 8k/. August 19, for shaving the
preachers at conference, £7 ^s. 2)d. 1787 : February 2, two trees
for front of dwelling house, 3^. 6d. ; December 17, for curtain
over the altar, £$ is. gd. 1789 : March 28, paid expenses of
a hogshead of cider, from Guernsey, a present to Mr. Wesley,
£1 gs. ; July 7, paid the man servant a quarter's wages,
£1 is. ; December 29, paid Mr. Moore for cold bath,
£1 IS. 1790: July I, the hairdresser's bill, £1 is., for one
MetJiodism in London. 225
quarter. 1791 : February 22, paid the Rev. Mr. Wesley's 1776
salary (the last he received) ^15 ; April 20, paid for Age"73
Rev. Mr. Wesley's horses standing at livery after his
decease, £1 \\s. <^d. ; December 3, paid Mr. Judd's bill
for hanging the New Chapel with black superfine cloth,
These may seem little things to introduce into a work like
this ; but little things often indicate greater, and, sometimes,
it is only by knowing minute matters that men can form a
correct opinion of a great general system.
After this long, but we hope not uninteresting digression,
we must return to Wesley in 1776.
On Sunday evening, March 3, he set out from London
to Bristol, and thence to his societies in the north. The
tour was not completed until the 19th of July following, when
he got back to London. Its incidents were much the same
as previous ones, except that he was permitted to preach
in a larger number of churches than usual, — namely, at
Pebworth, Chowbent, Heptonstall, Bingley, Haworth, Colne,
and at Banff in Scotland,^ a proof that clerical prejudice was
subsiding, and that the poor branded outcast was beginning to
be regarded with a more favourable eye. The churches that
he occupied in Yorkshire were crowded. Thomas Taylor, at
that time in the Haworth circuit, writes, in his unpublished
diary : " Saturday, April 27 — Mr. Wesley preached at
Bradford, at 5 a.m. At 10^, to the surprise of many, he
preached in Bingley church, from Acts xxiv. 25. I never saw
Mt is a disgraceful fact that Charles Wesley was buried, not at the
expense of the London circuit, but by private subscription. Nineteen
London Methodists subscribed ^lo I3j-. 6d., and William Marriott made
up the deficiency of ^3 3^. The pages in the old society book, on which
this account is written, were wafered together by four large wafers, doubt-
less for the purpose of hiding the shame of the old Methodists of 1788.
^ The following was written to Robert Dall, one of Wesley's itinerants.
" Banff, Jaiiuary i, 1777.
"Dear Father in the Lord, — The society has been stationary ever
since you left us. We are often neglected. Lately we had only one visit
in eight weeks. Mr. Wesley was here on the 20th of May last, and
preached on the Parade from 2 Corinthians viii. 9. He supped at Lord
Banff's, and next night at Admiral Gordon's lady's house, with a great
number of great ones ; and, at their request, he preached in the English
chapel to an elegant and crowded congregation. We are, etc., William
and Isabel McPherson." (Manuscript letter.)
VOL. IIL Q
2 26 Life and Times of Wesley.
^77" him weep while preaching before now. He spoke awfully,
Age 73 and the congregation heard attentively. The next day
(Sunday) I heard him at Keighley in the morning, and then
at Haworth church. Afterwards, the sacrament was ad-
ministered, but in too great a hurry. Several hundreds com-
municated in less than an hour. We then dined, in haste
and confusion, and drove off to Colne. I rode fast, and got
thither before Mr. Wesley. The street was filled with people
waiting to welcome him ; but, when about two miles from
Colne, his chaise broke down, which somewhat delayed his
coming. He mounted a horse, however, and so arrived in
safety. The crowd was so great that it was with difficulty we
got into the church. The sexton led us to the reading desk,
and thereby I got a seat. IMr. Wesley's text was Revelation
XX. 12. At the beginning he was rather flat; but, at the
end, he spake many awful things."
Wesley's journey to the north was always one continued
panorama of toil and travel, preaching and praying, conferring
with his preachers and visiting the sick. Hardly one in a
thousand could have borne the burden of its labours without
bending ; and yet Wesley, an old man, was always, in the
midst of gigantic toils, blithe and happy ; and never went
northwards without making his large circuit larger. Besides
other places, he now, for the first time, preached at Chester-
field. Three years before, Jeremiah Cocker had gone from
Sheffield, and stood on a table, in the midst of the market
place, and begun to preach. A man, hired for the purpose,
pulled him down. Jerry again mounted his rostrum, and was
again pulled down. A third time he ascended, and a third
time his assailant brought him to the ground. The old
Adam now began to stir in the athletic preacher, and,
seizing the man, he gave him a shake hardly gentle. " That
is not the spirit of Christ," shouted the mob, which, all at
once, had become pious. " I acknowledge it," said Jerry ;
and again he jumped upon his table, and finished his discourse.^
Wesley opened the conference of 1776, in London, on
August 6, and concluded it three days afterwards. He
writes : " In several conferences we have had great love and
' Manuscript.
Confer e7ice of i'j'j6. 227
unity; but in this there was, over and above, such a general ^776
seriousness and solemnity of spirit as we scarcely ever had Age 73
before." " Everything," says Thomas Taylor, " was conducted
in great order. A very strict scrutiny was made into every
one's character; and I am glad so few were found culpable." ^
The truth is, objections to the preachers had become so
rife, that Wesley felt it to be his duty to interfere. He
writes: " It is objected, that some of our preachers are utterly
unqualified for the work, and that others do it negligently, as
if they imagined they had nothing to do but to preach once
or twice a day. In order to silence this objection for ever,
which has been repeated ten times over, the preachers were
examined at large, especially those concerning whom there
was the least doubt. The result was, that one was excluded
for inefficiency, and two for misbehaviour. And we were
thoroughly satisfied, that all the rest had both grace and gifts
for the work wherein they are engaged. I hope, therefore, we
shall hear of this objection no more."
Even in 1776, as now, there were crabbed, cantankerous
Methodists, to whom discipline was a blessing. Those in
Ireland refused to contribute to the yearly collection, saying,
it "was nothing to them ; they would only bear their own
expenses." This was worse than foolish ; it was disloyal and
unjust. In their own fashion, they were willing to feed and
clothe the preachers sent to them ; but they expected some
one else to pay their expenses for travelling, and for the
sickness of themselves and their families ; or, perhaps, these
Irish Methodists had dreamt that itinerants travelled with-
out expense, and, so far as sickness was concerned and
the need of medicine, were entirely exempted from the
dire effects of Adam's curse. Wesley says, with honest in-
dignation ; " These are properly tJicir expenses ; nor will
we pay any part of them for the time to come, unless their
yearly contribution enable us so to do." If the Irish stopped
supplies on one side of the channel, Wesley could stop
supplies on the other side as Avell. This probably was a
dilemma which the simple Hibernians had not studied.
There was another unpleasantness at the conference of 1776.
^ Taylor's manuscript journals.
2 28 Life and Times of Wesley.
iT]^ Circuit stewards complained, that some of the preachers
Age73 ■\vives were sluts, and spoiled their houses ; and the preachers,
on the other hand, complained that their houses were hardly
homes, for the people, without ceremony, crowded into them
as into coffee houses. Wesley dealt with both complaints in
his own laconic way ; directing that no "known slut" should
have a house to spoil ; and that no person, either on Sundays
or week days, should go into the preacher's house except to
ask a question.
The conference pronounced the opinion, that Calvinism had
been the grand hindrance of the work of God ; and, hence, to
stop its progress, all the preachers were requested — (i) To read,
with carefulness, the tracts published by Wesley, Fletcher,
and Sellon. (2) To preach universal redemption frequently,
explicitly, and lovingly. (3) Not to imitate the Calvinist
preachers in screaming, allegorising, and boasting; but to
visit as diligently as they did, to answer all their objections,
to advise the Methodists not to hear them, to pray constantly
and earnestly that God would stop the plague.
Was it wise to publish this.'' We doubt it; and so did
Toplady, for he immediately, without note or comment, repub-
lished it in his Gospel Magazine, with the heading " Authentic
Extract of what passed at a certain Confabulation, held at
London, August 6, 1776."
The Isle of Man now began' to attract attention. John
Crook was the son of a Lancashire physician, who squandered
his own and his wife's fortunes, and then died a miserable and
untimely death at sea, John was put apprentice to learn a
laborious trade, and then enlisted to be a soldier ; when he
was sent to Limerick, where, at the age of twenty-eight, he
was converted, in the Methodist chapel, in the year 1770.
Having purchased his discharge from the army, he returned
to Liverpool, where he became a classleader, and a local
preacher. At the beginning of 1775, he went, uncommissioned
except by God Himself, to the Isle of Man, and began to
preach, and had the lieutenant governor, and his lady, and all
the family, and the chief people in Castletown, to hear him.
Numbers had been converted ; and persecution had begun to
rage. On July 16, 1776, the following episcopal bull was
issued.
Age 73
AletJiodism in the Isle of Man. 229
" To the several Rectors, Vicars, Chaplains, and Curates, within the Isle TjjO
and Diocese of Man.
"Reverend Brethren, — Whereas, we have been informed, that
several unordained, unauthorised, and unqualified persons from other
countries have presumed, for some time past, to preach and teach pubhcly,
and hold and maintain conventicles, and have caused several weak per-
sons to combine themselves together in a new society, and have private
meetings, assemblies, and congregations, contrary to the doctrine, govern-
ment, rites and ceremonies of the Established Church, and the civil and
ecclesiastical laws of this island — -
" We do, therefore, for the prevention of schism, and the establishment
of uniformity of religious worship, which so long hitherto has subsisted
among us, hereby desire and require each and every one of you, to be
vigilant and use your utmost endeavours to dissuade your respectiv-e
flocks from following, or being led and misguided by, such incompetent
teachers, and to exhort, incite, and invite them devoutly to read the holy
Scripture, to attend reverently the blessed sacraments of their parish
church, and the ghostly advice of their own ministers, by which they will
be better and more comfortably instructed in the meaning of grace and
salvation, than by the crude and pragmatical and inconsistent, if not
profane and blasphemous, extempore effusions of these pretenders to the
true religion ; and, if afterwards they regard not the truth, but obstinately
persist in error, then to know and find out the names of such persons,
within your respective parishes and chapelries, as attend the public
instructions of the said disorderly and unqualified teachers, or frequent
the said conventicles, meetings, assemblies, and congregations ; and if,
upon due inquiry and certain information, you discover, or, consistently
with your own knowledge, know any licensed schoolmaster, mistress,
parish clerk, or any other person, who holds any office or employment by
licence from us or our predecessors, that you signify and make known to
us in writing the names, within one month after the receipt hereof, as also
unto our reverend vicars general or any one of them, of the persons
who attend the instructions of the said teachers, or frequent the said
conventicles.
"And we, likewise, further desire and require each and every one of
you, in case any of the above mentioned unordained, unauthorised, and
unqualified teachers shall, at any time hereafter, offer to partake of the
holy communion in any of your respective churches or chapels, that you
repel him or them so offering, and the minister so repelling them or any
of them to give an account of the same unto us within fourteen days, at
the farthest, as is directed in the rubric in that behalf.
" Given at Peeltown, July 16, 1776.
"R. SoDOR A^^D Man.
"P.S. — Let these be forwarded, in the usual manner, and the time of
receiving and forwarding be noted by each of you. You will also take a
copy thereof, and publish it, in English and Manx, at the usual time, in
230 Life and Times of Wesley.
1776 your respective churches and chapels the Sunday next after the receipt
thereof." '
Age 73
Such was the fuhnen bnituvi discharged at the poor
Methodists from the episcopal battery of the Isle of Man.
Twelve days later, John Crook wrote as follows to a friend
at Liverpool.
"Castletown, Isle of Man, Ji/ly 28, 1776.
" My dear Brother, — 1 am now in hot war. The devil has stirred
up the Rev. Mr. Moor, of Douglas, and made a firebrand of him, to set
all the island on fire. This gentleman has set his schoolboys to work, to
write chosen texts of Scripture a.g2.\n'5t false pfophets, dreamers of dreams,
running and not being sent, etc. He has also picked up a ballad,
written, I fancy, by the late Dr. Bowden, and has dispersed manuscript
copies of it, and of the texts, among the populace, and put them into a
most violent flame. The effect on us, as a society, is, we are hooted at,
slutched, and stoned, whenever we go to worship God. Mr. Moor's
scholars, in particular, and the rabble of the town in general, gather round
our place of meeting, and first sing the blasphemous ballad, and then
proceed to throw dirt and stones at the windows and door. As for
myself, when I come out they plentifully salute me with channel dirt, with
which they have often plastered me pretty well. When the scholars meet
me at mid day, they curse me most horribly, and throw at me chips, hard
pieces of mortar, potatoes, stones, or whatever comes to hand. But if
this were all, we might do well enough'; but this brand has communicated
the infectious blaze to the bishop, who has issued a bull, dated, not Rome,
but Peeltown, which was published in the churches last sabbath. I have
petitioned the governor for liberty of conscience, but he and the bishop
are so unanimous, that, he says, he will not interfere in the case, but
wishes me to write a memorial setting forth my suit. I am not willing to
do this, but have given Mr. Wesley an account of the matter, and hope
he will direct me how to act.
" I am, your willing servant in the gospel,
"John Crook." 2
Wesley replied to Mr. Crook as follows.
" London, Augtist 10, 1776.
" My dear Brother, — By all means, stay in the island till the storm
be ended : in your patience possess your soul. Beware of despising your
opponents ! Beware of anger and resentment ! Return not evil for evil,
or Vaihng for railing. I advise you to keep, with a few serious people,
a day of fasting and prayer. God has the hearts of all men in His
hands. Neither Dr. Moor, nor the bishop himself, is out of His reach. Be
fervent in prayer, that God would arise and maintain His own cause.
Assuredly, He will not suffer you to be tempted above what you are able to
^ John Crook's original copy. - Manuscript letter.
Age 73
Quarrelling Schoolboys reconciled. 231
bear. Violent methods of redress arc not to be used, till all other 1776
methods fail. I know pretty well the mind of Lord Mansfield, and of one
that is greater than he ; but, if I appealed to them, it would bring much
expense and inconvenience on Dr. Moor and others. I would not will-
ingly do this ; I love my neighbour as myself. Possibly, they may think
better, and allow that liberty of conscience which belongs to every par-
taker of human nature, and more especially to every one of his majesty's
subjects in his British dominions. To live peaceably with all men is the
earnest desire of your affectionate brother,
"John Wesley." 1
Three years after this, the Isle of IMan was a flourislihig
Methodist circuit, with 105 1 members of society.
No sooner was the conference in London ended, than
Wesley set out, on Sunday afternoon, August 1 1, for Corn-
wall. On his return, he- spent, as usual, about a month at
Bristol and in its vicinity. He began what, he says, he had
long intended, visiting the Bristol society from house to house,
setting apart at least two hours a day for that purpose. He
preached in the church at Midsomer Norton, the rector making
one of his congregation. Here an incident occurred which was
characteristic of the man, and is worth relating. Wesley was
entertained at the house of Mr. Bush, a local preacher, who
kept a boarding school. While there, two of the boys
quarrelled, and cuffed and kicked each other most vigorously,
Mrs. Bush brought the pugilists to Wesley. He talked to them,
and repeated the lines :
" Birds in their little nests agree,
And 'tis a shameful sight,
When children of one family
Fall out, and chide, and fight."
" You must be reconciled," said he ; " go and shake hands
with each other." They did so. " Now," he continued, " put
your arms round each other's neck, and kiss each other." This
w^as also done. " Now," said he, " come to me " ; and, taking
two pieces of bread and butter, he folded them together, and
desired each to take a part. "Now," he added, "you have
broken bread together." He then put his hands upon their
heads, and blessed them. The two tigers were turned into
loving lambs; they never forgot the old man's blessing; and
' Methodist Magazine, 1 808, p. 1 03 .
232 Life (tnd Times of Wesley.
1776 one of them became a magistrate in Berks, and related the
Age 73 occurrence with intense interest in after days.^
Having returned to London, Wesley set out, on November
13, accompanied by his invalid friend, Fletcher, to Norwich.
He says : " I took coach at twelve, slept till six, and then
spent the time very agreeably in conversation, singing, and
reading. I read Mr. Bolt's account of the affairs in the East
Indies. What a scene is here opened ! What consummate
villains, what devils incarnate, were the managers there!
What utter strangers to justice, mercy, and truth ; to every
sentiment of humanity ! I believe no heathen history con-
tains a parallel. I remember none in all the annals of
antiquity ; not even the divine Cato, or the virtuous Brutus,
plundered the provinces committed to their charge with such
merciless cruelty as the English have plundered the desolated
provinces of Hindostan."
The two friends returned to London on November 21 ; and,
a few days later, Wesley started on his accustomed visitation
to Bedfordshire, etc. ; and, on the way, read the poetical works
of Gray, whom he pencils as " sharp, sensible, and ingenious ;
but proud, morose, envious, passionate, and resentful."
After this, he made a tour through Kent ; and then writes :
"December 31 — We concluded the year with solemn praise
to God, for continuing His great work in our land. It has
never been intermitted one year, or one month, since the year
1738 ; in which my brother and I began to preach that strange
doctrine of salvation by faith."
The Calvinistic controversy was now in its last agonies ;
but, on the part of the elect, was as acrimonious as ever.
Some one published a twopenny pamphlet, entitled, ^* A
necessary Alarm and most earnest Caveto against Tabernacle
Principles and Tabernacle Connections ; containing the sub-
stance of an extraordinary Harangue and Exhortation, deli-
vered at Penzance, in August, 1774 ; on an extraordinary occa-
sion. By J. W., Master of very extraordinary Arts." In this
infamous burlesque, Wesley is treated with as much ridicule as
the anonymous author could command ; and Toplady, in
reviewing it, in his Gospel Magazine, of course commends it,
^ Methodist Magazine, 1842, p. 136.
Wesley s Wife. 233
as "a delicate satire on Wesley," and hopes that "the cream 1776
of tartar, so ably administered by the anonymous physician, Aee~73
will prove a sweetener of the patient's crudities, and conduce
to carry off some portion of his self sufficiency." Wesley,
however, had been so " severely peppered and salted of late
years," that the considerate editor of the Gospel Magazine
benevolently intimates that he shall, on that account, refrain
from adding to the pepper and salt seasonings, which " must
often have made Wesley smart and wince like an eel dis-
possessed of its skin."^
This was bad enough ; but there were other things even
worse. Wesley's wife, (originally a not too respectable serv^ant
girl,) stole a number of Wesley's letters, and interpolated words,
and misinterpreted spiritual expressions, so as to make the
letters bear a bad construction. She read them to an elect
party of Calvinists, and agreed to send them to the Moriwig
Post for publication. Two masked assassins, who assumed
the not inappropriate names of Scorpion and Snapdragon,
furiously assailed him, in the London newspaper, professing
to ground their charges against him upon his own private
papers, which the woman, who was legally his wife, had put
into their hands. A more infamous episode does not occur in
Wesley's history. The charges were cruel insinuations,
founded upon interpolated letters, stolen by a faithless woman,
who, in order to defame a husband of whom she was utterly
unworthy, not only committed theft but forgery, and then put
herself into the hands pf a set of holy Calvinists, who em-
ployed her perfidy and meanness in injuring the man whom,
at the altar of the Most High God, she had sworn to love,
honour, and obey. This is strong language ; but the writer,
knowing more than he chooses to make public, uses it
with deliberate design. Charles Wesley, finding the use that
was being made of his brother's papers, was in the utmost
consternation, and went off in haste, wishing him to postpone
a journey, and to stay in town to defend himself against his
enemies. Wesley w^as as calm as his loving and faithful
brother was excited. " I shall never forget," said Miss
Wesley, " the manner in which my father accosted my
Gospel Magazine, 1776, p. 475.
2 34 Life and Times of Wesley.
1776 mother on his return home. 'My brother,' said he, 'is indeed
Age 73 an extraordinary man. I placed before him the importance
of the character of a minister ; and the evil consequences
which might result from his indifference to it; and urged him,
by every relative and public motive, to answer for himself,
and stop the publication. His reply was, ' Brother, zvJien I
devoted to God my ease, my time, my life, did I except my
reputation f No. Tell Sally I will take her to Canterbury
to-inorroiv.'"'^
On the Arminian side of the controversy, the chief, if not
the only, publication issued in 1776, was Fletcher's masterly
" Answer to the Rev. Mr. Toplady's ' Vindication of the
Decrees,' etc." i2mo, 128 pages. Never was a bravo shaved
with so sharp a razor, and by so adept a hand.
Except "An Extract of the Life of Madame Guion," i2mo,
230 pages, Wesley's only publications, in 1776, were the two
political tracts following, i. "Some Observations on Liberty,
occasioned by a late Tract": i2mo, 36 pages. And, 2. "A
Seasonable Address to the more Serious Part of the Lihabit-
ants of Great Britain, respecting the Unhappy Contest
between us and our American Brethren ; with an occasional
Word interspersed to those of a different complexion": i2mo,
18 pages.
The former was an answer to Dr. Price, a unitarian
minister far more famed for politics than for preaching, who
had recently published his " Observations on the Nature of
Civil Liberty, the Principles of Government, and the Justice
and Policy of the War with America." This was considered
the ablest work, in exposition of the injurious policy pursued
by England toward America, that had yet been issued.
Within less than two years, eight editions were printed ; and,
in testimony of their approbation of it, the common council
of London presented to the author the freedom of the city in
a golden box. Thus, in fighting with Dr. Price, Wesley
was far from fighting with a shadow.
Both of Wesley's tracts display, not only his wonted ability,
but his profound loyalty to the government of King George,
his benevolence of heart, and his intense interest in the
^ Jackson's Life of C. Wesley, vol. ii., p. 283,
Wesley s Loyalty. 235
Age 73
fratricidal war which was then raging. A more loyal subject iyy(3
than Wesley, England never had ; perhaps, indeed, his loving
loyalty sometimes made him somewhat blind to the faultiness
of ruling powers. No man was more obedient to law; and no
man more cheerfully paid his taxes. The last mentioned
might not amount to much ; but they were never tendered
with a niggard's hand. Some imagined that he, the bishop
of 40,000 Methodists, was sure to have an enormous income,
and a silver chest well stocked with plate ; and that, therefore,
his assessments ought to be higher than they were. So, for
instance, thought the commissioners of his majesty's excise,
in 1776. Hence the following circular :
" Reverend Sir, — As the commissioners cannot doubt but you have
plate for which you have hitherto neglected to make entry, they have
directed me to inform you, that they expect you forthwith to make due
entry of all your plate, such entry to bear date from the commencement
of the plate, duty, or from such time as you have owned, used, had, or
kept any quantity of silver plate, chargeable by the act of parliament ; as,
in default hereof, the board will be obliged to signify your refusal to their
lordships. An immediate answer is desired."
Think of John Wesley, always on the wing, having a hoard
of silver plate to adorn his sumptuous table when feasting his
Epicurean coadjutors and his dinner loving friends. The idea
was- almost too silly to be ridiculous. Wesley seems to have
thought it so ; and his answer (with which we close the
present year) was as follows.
" Sir, — I have two silver teaspoons at London, and tico at Bristol.
This is all the plate which I have at present ; and I shall not buy any
more, while so many round me want bread.
" I am, sir, your most humble servant,
"John Wesley."
1777-
^777 XT LESLEY was always full of work. He began the year
Age 74 V V 1777 with a course of lectures on the book of Ecclesi-
astes, and says : " I never before had so clear a sight either
of the meaning or the beauties of it ; neither did I imagine,
that the several parts of it were, in so exquisite a manner,
connected together ; all tending to prove that grand truth,
that there is no happiness out of God."
He also spent an hour every morning with his London
preachers, Messrs. Jaco, Hindmarsh, Murlin, Pilmoor, Atlay,
Bradford, and Olivers, in instructing them as he used to
instruct his Oxford pupils, and in promoting their piety.
He likewise begun visiting the society, many of whom he
found in the deepest poverty, and writes : " O why do not all
the rich that fear God constantly visit the poor ? Can they
spend part of their spare time better } Certainly not : so
they will find in that day, when ' every man shall receive his
own reward according to his own labour.' "
To his surprise, he once more preached in a London
church — Allhallows ; and says : " I found great liberty of
spirit ; and the congregation seemed to be much affected.
How is this ? Do I yet please men .-* Is the offence of
the cross ceased .'' It seems, after being scandalous near
fifty years, I am at length growing into an honourable
man."
At the beginning of the month of February, he hurried off
to Bristol, to quiet some of the society, who were in danger
of becoming disaffected towards government ; and preached
from, " Put them in mind to be subject to principalities and
powers." Finding that there had been repeated attempts to
fire the city, he preached again, taking as his text, " Is there
any evil in the city, and the Lord hath not done it.'*" He
also wrote and- published, "A Calm Address to the Inhabit-
ants of England": i2mo, 23 pages. He states, that a year
and a half ago, from fifty to a hundred thousand copies of
Dr. Dodd. 237
his " Calm Address to the American Colonies" had been dis- 1777
persed, and the effect had exceeded his most sanguine hopes. a~74
This encouraged him now to address " the inhabitants of Old
England^ He then gives an account of the rise and progress
of the American rebellion, tracing it back as far as the year
1737. He proceeds to state that, after bawling for liberty,
no liberty was left in the confederate provinces of America ;
the liberty of the press, religious liberty, and civil liberty
were nonentities. The lords of the congress w^ere as
absolute as the emperor of Morocco ; whereas, in England,
the fullest liberty was enjoyed, " both as to religion, life, body,
and goods." He tells the Methodists that, though many,
Avho go under that name, hate the king and all his ministers,
only less than they hate an Arminian, he would no more
continue in fellowship with -those that were connected with
him, if they did this, than he would continue in fellowship
" with whoremongers, or sabbath breakers, or thieves, or
drunkards, or common swearers."
The whole tract is written in his most pungent style ; and,
whatever may be thought of the wisdom of Wesley's politics,
all must admire his devoted loyalty. Of course, like his
" Calm Address to the American Colonies," it stirred a nest
of hornets. Almost immediately, there was published, in the
Gospel Magazine, a poem reviling him in unmeasured terms.
He is represented as "spitting venom, spite, and rage";
" Father Johnny" is accused of telling "barefaced lies," and
is thus admonished in the last two lines :
" O think of this, thou grey haired sinner,
Ere Satan pick thy bones for dinner."
Wesley returned to London on February 8, and, a week
later, fulfilled a painful duty. For more than twenty years,
Dr. Dodd had been one of the most popular preachers in the
metropolis. When at the zenith of his fame, he, in 1774, sent
an anonymous letter to Lady Apsley, offering her ^^3000 if
she would prevail with her husband, the lord chancellor, to
appoint him to the valuable rectory of St. George's, Hanover
Square, which was then vacant. The writer was detected, and,
as a consequence, was struck out of the list of royal chaplains,
was assailed with bitter invectives by the press, and was
22,S Life and Times of JVeslcy.
1777 severely ridiculed by Foote, in a farce, entitled "The Cozeners."
An^74 Withdrawing from England, where he had now become an
object of contempt, he, for a time, found an asylum at
Geneva, with his former pupil. Lord Chesterfield. On his
return to this country, he became editor of a newspaper, and
then a bankrupt. In 1776, he visited France, and, with little
regard to decency, appeared in a phaeton at the races on the
plains of Sablons, dressed in all the foppery of the country in
which he then resided. Strange to say, he was still popular, as
a preacher, at the Magdalen, in London, where he delivered
his last discourse on February 2, 1777, from the ominous text:
" And among these nations shalt thou find no ease, neither
shall the sole of thy foot have rest ; but the Lord shall give
thee there a trembling heart, and failing of eyes, and sorrow of
mind ; and thy life shall hang in doubt before thee ; and thou
shalt fear day and night, and shalt have none assurance of
thy life."
Only two days afterwards, he forged the name of Lord
Chesterfield to a bond for ^^"4200, on the security of which
he obtained a considerable loan. Detection speedily ensued ;
and, before the month was ended, he was arrested, tried at
the Old Bailey, and was convicted. The crime was forgery ;
the penalty was death. For four months, the unhappy culprit
was kept in prison. His friends were indefatigable, in their
endeavours, to obtain a commutation of his punishment.
Even the city of London, in its corporate capacity, earnestly
solicited that his sentence might not be carried into effect.
Dr. Johnson, with his weighty pen, tried to arouse popular
feeling in his favour, alleging that petitions for clemency had
been signed by above thirty thousand people, and that justice
might reasonably be satisfied with his imprisonment, infamy,
exile, penury, and ruin. All was of no avail ; and on June
26 the great preacher died a felon's death by the hands of
the common hangman.
In the days of his prosperity, Dodd had been in the ranks
of Wesley's enemies ; and, more than once, had reviled him,
his people, and his creed ; and, yet, strange to tell, no sooner
was he incarcerated for his crime, than he sent for Wesley to
visit him. The latter writes: "1777, February 15 — At the
third message, I took up my cross, and went to see Dr. Dodd,
Dr. Dodd. 239
in the Compter. I was greatly surprised. He seemed, though 1777
deeply affected, yet thoroughly resigned to the will of God. a~74
Mrs. Dodd, likewise, behaved with the utmost propriety. I
doubt not, God will bring good out of this evil." " February
18 — I visited him again, and found him still in a desirable
state of mind ; calmly giving himself up to whatsoever God
should determine concerning him."
Both Wesley and his brother had always evinced an almost
unequalled interest in the welfare of imprisoned convicts ;
but, remembering past treatment from this popular, but now
incarcerated, preacher, and also remembering the terrible
scandal which he had brought upon Christ's religion, no
wonder that Wesley felt it a cross to visit him. Wesley,
however, was not the man to shun a duty because it
happened to be painful ; and there can be no doubt that,
if his itinerant engagements had not taken him away from
London, the gloom of the convict's cell would often have
been relieved, during the next four months, by Wesley's
presence.
■ Wesley had never even seen Dr. Dodd, either in
public or in private, until he saw him in Wood Street
compter, a few days before his removal to Newgate to
take his trial. " Sir," said the prisoner, " I have long
desired to see you ; but I little thought, that our first inter-
view \vould be in such a place as this." " We conversed,"
says Wesley, " about an hour ; he spoke of nothing but
his soul, and appeared to regard nothing in comparison of
it." At the second interview, Wesley spent half an hour
with the poor wretched man. " Sir," said he, " do not you
find it difficult to preserve your recollection, amidst all
these lawyers and witnesses t " Dodd answered : " It is
difficult ; but I have one sure hold : ' Lord, not as I will,
but as Thou wilt.' " The third visit was after his sentence
had been passed. Wesley writes : "He conversed about
an hour ; but had not one word about any but spiritual
things. I found his mind still quiet and composed ; sorrow-
ing, but not without hope." Two days before the execution,
Wesley went again. " Sir," said he, " I think you do not
ask enough, or expect enough, from God your Saviour.
The present blessing, you may expect from Him, is to be
240 Life and Times of Wesley.
1777 filled with all joy, as well as peace in believing." "O sir,"
•'^ge~74 replied the doctor, " it is not for such a sinner as I am to
expect any joy in this world. The utmost I can desire is
peace ; and, through the mercy of God, that I have."
Wesley adds : " We then spent a little time in prayer, and
I solemnly commended him to God. He was exactly in
such a temper as I wished. He never, at any time, ex-
pressed the least murmuring or resentment at any one ; but
entirely and calmly gave himself up to the will of God.
Such a prisoner I scarce ever saw before ; much less, such
a condemned malefactor."
This was Wesley's last interview. Two days later, the
once famous Dr. Dodd was hanged, Wesley expressing the
firm belief, that angels took him from the gallows to the
paradise of God.'
Perhaps more space has been devoted to Dr. Dodd than
some may thhik fitting; but, remembering the positions
occupied respectively by Dodd and Wesley, — the one the
most popular and fashionable preacher that London had,
and the other an outcast clergyman, who, for eight-and-
thirty years, had been reviled in every form that malice
and ingenuity could devise, — it was no slight fact, that, as
soon as Dodd was face to face with death, the man he sent
for was, not one of his old associates, lay or clerical, but
the man who had been, and still was, the butt of national
persecution, and whom he himself in the days of his
prosperity had treated disrespectfully. Dr. Dodd, when he
most needed them, had more faith in Wesley's counsels and
Wesley's prayers than he had in the counsels and prayers of
those whom he had been accustomed to call his friends. His
confidence was not misplaced. Wesley did his best ; Wesley's
brother poured forth the feelings of his heart in " A Prayer
for Dr. Dodd under Condemnation"; and Miss Bosanquet
wrote to the poor prisoner not a few of her Christian letters.
The result was, Dodd, on the very day of Wesley's final visit,
thus addressed his lady correspondent : " My dear Friend, —
On Friday morning I am to be made immortal ! I die with
a* heart truly contrite, and broken under a sense of its great
* Methodist ATaj^aztfie, 17S3, p. 358.
City Road Chapel. 241
and manifold offences, but comforted and sustained by a firm 1777
faith in the pardoning love of Jesus Christ." ^ Agr74
On the loth of March, Wesley left London on a seventeen
days' preaching tour to Bristol and back again. This was
the year for his pastoral visitation in the north ; but, he
writes, " I cannot be long absent " from London, " while
the new chapel is building," In fact, Wesley became so
interested in his great building scheme, that he was tempted
to turn architect himself. " It seems," says he in a letter
to Miss Ball, of Wycombe, dated March 13, 1777, "it seems,
the time is come, that you are to have a more commodious
preaching house at High Wycombe. I will give you a plan
of the building myself ; and employ whom you please to
build." ^ After all, the Methodists at Wycombe might have
had a worse architect than Wesley.
Ten days were spent in Lo.ndon, and, it being Easter time,
Wesley writes : " During the octave, I administered the
Lord's supper every morning, after the example of the
primitive church." On Sunday, April 6, he set out on his
northern journey, making collections, as he went, for his
London chapel. When he had got only as far as Lancashire,
he was obliged to return to London to lay the foundation
stone on April 21. A week later, he took coach for Newcastle
upon Tyne. Here he spent four days, and then again turned
his face southward ; and, preaching all the way, reached
the metropolis on the 17th of May.
Having met the building committee, which was his chief
business in London, and having, with his brother, visited
Dr. Dodd, he, a third time, started north on Sunday,
May 25. He now hurried on to Whitehaven, and paid his
first visit to the Isle of Man, where he spent the first three
days in the month of June, and says: "A more loving,
simple hearted people than this I nev^er saw ; and no
wonder ; for they have but six papists, and no Dissenters,
in the island."
Here he met witli the Rev. E. and Mrs. Smyth, the
former a clergyman from Ireland, and the latter a young
' Life of C. Wesley, vol. ii., p. 311.
^ Memoir of Ball, p. 137.
VOL. III. R
242 Life and Times of Wesley.
^777 wife of twenty-two. Mr. Smyth had been ejected from his
Age 74 curacy for preaching the doctrines of the Metliodists, and
especially for daring to reprove " the great man of the
parish " for living the life of an adulterer. Expelled from
the Established Church, he began to preach wherever he had
a chance, and became more extensively useful than ever.
Though the nephew of an archbishop, his home was a
thatched cabin, and his trials not a few. Hearing that
Wesley was about to visit the Isle of Man, Mr. Smyth and
his wife came to meet him. Wesley received them with his
customary kindness, and, during their stay, met with a mis-
adventure, which is worth relating. He writes : " I set out for
Douglas in the one-horse chaise, Mrs. Smyth riding with me.
In about an hour, in spite of all I could do, the headstrong
horse ran the wheel against a large stone : the chaise overset
in a moment ; but we fell so gently on the smooth grass, that
neither of us was hurt at all."
Such is Wesley's account ; Mrs. Smyth's reflects on Wesley's
charioteering capabilities. " He told me," she writes, "when
we got into the carriage, that he could drive a chaise forty
years ago ; but, poor dear man ! his hand seemed out of
practice, as I thought we should be overturned several times.
At last, one of the wheels being mounted on one side of a
ditch, we were both pitched out on a green plain, as the Lord
in mercy ordered it ; for had we been overset in some parts
of the road, it is more than probable we should have been
killed on the spot. I found no bad effects from the fall at
the time ; but the next morning I was scarce able to stir, and
felt so sore and bruised that I thought it likely I should lay
my bones in the churchyard at Douglas." ^
We shall meet with Mr. and Mrs. Smyth again ; suffice it
to add, that, immediately after preaching at Douglas, Wesley
set sail for England; and, a few days after, his newly acquired
friends went back to Ireland, while he himself went on his
way to London. In his progress, he, for the first time,
preached at Settle, where Methodism had recently been
introduced by John Read, a poor dogger, and where one
^ Life of Mrs. Smyth, p. 33.
Catastrophe at Colne. 243
of the first members was Edward Slater, who became 1777
Wesley's coachman.' Age~74
Wesley proceeded to Otley, where Miss Ritchie, apparently,
was dying ; to Bradford, where William Brammah, one of
Wesley's weakest preachers, had been amazingly useful ; to
Birstal and Huddersfield, where thousands upon thousands
assembled to hear him ; and to Colne, where, as soon as he
entered the pulpit, the left hand gallery of the chapel fell, with
nearly two hundred persons in it.
William Sagar, a young man not then in business for
"himself, had been the principal promoter of this erection, and
had made himself responsible for the payment of the cost.
When the walls were half way up, the workmen became
clamorous for their wages ; and Mr. Sagar unfortunately was
without funds ; but, two or three days afterwards, a gentleman,
unsolicited, offered to lend him the money needed. One
trouble was got over, but another was yet to come. When
the ill fated chapel was ready for the roof, a gale of wind
blew down the western gable, and shook the entire edifice to
its foundations. And now, to crown the whole, through the
malevolence of a carpenter who had purposely cut the timbers
too short, down fell the left hand gallery ; and, though no
lives were lost, yet not a few of the people had their limbs
broken, and were otherwise severely injured.^
It was at this period that Colne was made the head of what
Thomas Taylor called " a snug circuit " ; though the circuit
embraced the entire region constituting the Todmorden,
Bacup, Haslingden, Blackburn, Burnley, Preston, Garstang,
Lancaster, Clitheroe, and Padiham circuits of the present
day. Taylor was the assistant of the circuit before it was
made so sntig, and was Wesley's companion at the time of the
Colne catastrophe. In his voluminous unpublished diary, he
tells us, that at Otley Wesley not only preached, but made a
collection for his London chapel ; at Bingley, he preached in
the parish church ; at Keighley, after preaching, Wesley stood
on one side of the path and Taylor on the other, and, with
their hats in their hands, collected upwards of £"] for the new
^ Bardsley's manuscript letters.
^Manuscript memoir of Mr. Sagar.
244 Life and Times of Wesley.
1777 chapel in City Road; at Colne, Taylor was with Wesley in
Age~74 ^^^^ pulpit when the gallery fell. He writes : " Oh, what a
scene ensued. The dismal shrieks of those whose limbs were
broken, or who were otherwise injured, and the cries of the
women for their children, were terrible. Happily no lives
were lost, and much less damage done than might have been
expected. As soon as the confusion was abated, Mr. Wesley
preached out of doors ; but the catastrophe prevented many
from hearing." ^
Wesley proceeded to Derby, where, strangely enough,
another accident occurred, which might have been as serious
as that at Colne. An hour before the congregation assembled
in the chapel, part of the roof fell in ; the people, however,
rushed to hear, despite the doubtful state of the flimsy
edifice; and, among others permanently benefited by Wesley's
ministry, was Catherine Spencer, who, for sixty-four years,
adorned her religious profession by "a meek and quiet spirit,"
and who died at the age of eighty-six, in 1843.^
Wesley got back to London on June 21, and, a week later,
wrote: "June 28 — I have now completed my seventy-fourth
year, and, by the peculiar favour of God, I find my health and
strength, and all my faculties of body and mind, just the same
as they were at four-and-twenty."
A man, on his birthday, frequently reviews the past, sifts
the present, and reflects upon the future. At this period
Wesley wrote as follows to his legal friend, Walter Churchey,
of Brecon, the birthplace of Thomas Coke.
" My dear Brother, — At present, I am very safe ; for I am a good
many pounds, if not scores of pounds, worse than nothing. In my will, I
bequeath no money but what may happen to be in my pocket when I die.
" Dr. Coke promises fair, and gives us reason to hope, that he will, bring
forth, not only blossoms, but fruit. He has hitherto behaved exceeding
well, and seems to be aware of his grand enemy — applause. He will
likewise be in danger from offence. If you are acquainted with him, a
friendly letter might be of use, and would be taken kindly. He now
stands on slippery ground, and is in need of every help.
" I am your affectionate brother,
"John Weslev."^
^ Taylor's manuscript diary.
2 Methodist Magazine, 1 844, p. 70.
3 Wesley's Works, vol. xii., p. 406.
John I niton. 245
Having spent nine days in London, Wesley set out, on i777
June 30, on a preaching tour which occupied the whole of the Age 74
ensuing month. Proceeding by way of Buckingham, he
visited Oxford, Witney, Stroud, Gloucester, Tewkesbury,
Worcester, Malvern ; and then passed through Wales to
Bristol, which he reached on July 28.
■Here, on August 5, he opened his annual conference, and
writes :
"As the report had been spread far and wide, I now particularly
inquired of every assistant, 'Have you reason to beheve, from your own
observation, that the Methodists are a fallen people ? Is there a decay or
an increase in the work of God where you have been ? Are the societies
in general more dead, or more alive to God, than they were some years
ago?' The almost universal answer was: ' If we must know them by
their fruits, there is no decay in the work of God among the people in
general. The societies are not dead to God : they are as much alive as
they have been for many years. And we look on this report as a mere
device of Satan, to make our hands hang down.'
"'But how can this question be decided?' You can judge no further
than you see. You cannot judge of one part by another; and none but
myself has an opportunity of seeing the Methodists throughout the three
kingdoms.
" But to come to a short issue. In most places, the Methodists are still
a poor, despised people, labouring under reproach, and many inconveni-
ences ; therefore, wherever the power of God is not, they decrease. By
this then, you may form a sure judgment Do the Methodists in general
decrease in number ? Then they decrease in grace ; they are a fallen, or,
at least, a falling people. But they do not decrease in number; they con-
tinually increase ; therefore, they are not a fallen people."
These are weighty words. They show Wesley's deep
anxiety to maintain the genuine character of the work in
which he was engaged ; and the test which he instituted was,
unquestionably, under existing circumstances, logical and
conclusive.
The principal propagator of the report, that the Methodists
were a fallen people, was John Hilton, who, for thirteen
years, had been an itinerant preacher. Dr. Stevens calls him
" an honest but weak headed man." This is scarcely correct.
Leaving his honesty an open question, John Hilton, judged
by his publications, was far from being " weak headed."
Wesley says : " He told us he must withdraw from our con-
nexion. Some would have reasoned with him, but it was lost
246 Life and Times of Wesley.
^777 labour; so we let him go in peace." Hilton was no sooner
■^ge74 gone, than he turned author, and, in 1778, besides an octavo
pamphlet of 32 pages, entitled, "The Deplorable State of
Man," he issued " Reasons for Quitting the Methodist
Society; being a Defence of Barclay's Apology;" 8vo, 66
pages. Dated, " Melksham, 3rd month, 28th day, 1778." He
tells his readers, that, "a year ago, Barclay's Apology converted
him to the principles of the quakers;" and a broadbrimmed
quaker John Hilton lienceforwards was. Both his pamphlets
are written in a plain, good, nervous style, and show, that, in
point of education and mental power, he was much superior
to the mass of Wesley's itinerants.^ Hilton was not without
talent; but like most who think themselves more religious
than their neighbours, he was sour and censorious. " What I
have lamented in him, for some years," wrote Wesley, in a
letter, dated October 22, 1777, "is an aptness to condemn and
despise his brethren. There is no failing more infectious than
this; and it is much if you did not catch a little of it from
him; otherwise you would hardly say, 'the body of Method-
ists are degenerated.' You cannot possibly judge whether
they are or not. Perhaps you converse with one or two hun-
dred of them. Now allowing two thirds of these to be
degenerated, can you infer the same concerning thirty or
forty thousand .'' Yet this I will allow, two thirds of those
who are grown rich are greatly degenerated. They do not,
will not, save all they can, in order to give all they can ; and,
without doing this, they cannot groiv in grace, nay, they con-
stantly grieve the Holy Spirit of God." ^
Thomas Taylor was at the conference of 1777, and tells us
that, on the conference Sunday, the morning service, in the
Broadmead chapel, lasted from half-past nine till nearly one
* Mr. Moore says : " this good man was possessed of eminent minis-
terial gifts, but he fell into the mystic delusion. He then became high
minded and censorious; and Mr. Charles Wesley, in his hours of depres-
sion, used too much to listen to him. The quakers were jealous of him-,
and kept him silent a long time, to his great mortification. But it was the
. very thing he needed, it was good medicine to heal his sickness. In
one of his last conversations with me, he said: ' I would not have thy
people to think of changing ; they may be disappointed.' He was then
in a sweet and humble spirit, very different from that in which he left us.'
(Moore's Life of Wesley, vol. ii., pp. 273, 274.)
2 Methodist Magazine, '807, p. 328.
Memorable Scene at Conference. 247
o'clock; that, at five in the afternoon, Wesley preached to a 1777
large and serious crowd out of doors, and afterwards, in a full a^74
society meeting, " expatiated upon the rules, and said many
useful things." He preached again in the evening of the first
day of conference, but not longer than twenty minutes. On
August 7, Taylor writes : " that great and good man Mr.
Fletcher came into conference. My eyes flowed with tears
at the sight of him. He spoke to us in a very respectful
manner, and took a solemn farewell. Dear, good man ! I
never saw so many tears shed in all my life." ^
Fletcher had sought health at Stoke Newington; but
was now the guest of Mr. Ireland, of Bristol. Benson, his
fellow sufferer in the Trevecca troubles, writes: "We have
had an edifying conference. Mr. Fletcher's visits have been
attended with a blessing. His appearance, his exhortations,
and his prayers, broke most of our hearts, and filled us with
shame and self abasement for our little improvement."^
This was a memorable scene. Fletcher, emaciated, feeble,
and ghostlike, entered the conference leaning on the arm of
his host, Mr. Ireland. In an instant, the whole assembly
stood up, and Wesley advanced to meet his almost seraphic
friend. The apparently dying man began to address the
brave itinerants, and, before he had uttered a dozen sentences,
one and all were bathed in tears. Wesley, fearing that
Fletcher was speaking too much, abruptly knelt at his side
and began to pray. Down fell the whole of Wesley's
preachers, and joined in the devotion of their great leader.
The burden of Wesley's supplication was, that his friend
might be spared to labour a little longer ; and this petition
was urged with such fervency and faith, that, at last, Wesley
closed by exclaiming with a confidence and an emphasis
which seemed to thrill every heart: "He shall not die, but
live, and declare the works of the Lord." ^
The event verified Wesley's words ; for though the pilgrim
was already walking on the margin of the river of death, and
had heaven's own sunshine shining on him, it was not until
eight years after that he passed the gates of the celestial city.
' Taylor's manuscript diary. 2 Treffry's Life of Uenson.
^ "Anecdotes of the Wesleys," p. 272.
248 Lif^ <^iid Times of Wesley.
^111 At the conference of 1776, it was reported, that there were
Age 74 3148 Methodists in America; in the minutes of 1777, America
is not mentioned. Still, American Methodism was not dead.
" I have just received two letters from New York," writes
Wesley on January ii, 1777. " They inform me, that all the
Methodists there are firm for the government, and, on that
account, persecuted by the rebels, only not to the death ; that
the preachers are still threatened, but not stopped ; and, that
the work of God increases much in Maryland and Virginia." ^
The war was raging with terrific violence ; and some of the
preachers, as Mr. Rodda, were not so wise, politically speaking,
as seemed desirable : but, despite all this, Methodism actually
spread and prospered. Thomas Rankin, George Shadford, and
others thought of fleeing from the field of conflict ; and it was
only by Asbury's solicitation, that they were induced to stay
awhile longer. The baptists too became a hindrance. " Like
ghosts," says Asbury, " they haunt us from place to place."
Wesley's political tracts also were a serious stumbling block.^
A Methodist backslider enlisted three hundred men for the
British army, was arrested, and hanged as a rebel against the
government of his country.^ Even peaceful, prudent, and
loyal Francis Asbury was fined £'^ for preaching at Nathan
Perrig's ; and, in October 1777, Rankin and Rodda returned
to England, and Shadford soon after, leaving poor, persecuted,
but faithful Asbury the only one of Wesley's itinerants that
now remained at the post of duty, and preaching peace to the
people by Jesus Christ.
And here let us pause to say, that a grander specimen of
a Christian apostle than Francis Asbury the world has never
had. Much as we revere the memory of Wesley, we regard
Asbury with an almost equal veneration. Among the self
denying, laborious, Christian ministers of the past eighteen
hundred years, we believe, that Francis Asbury has no
superiors, and but few that can be considered equals. And
yet, how little does the church catholic, indeed, how little does
the Methodist section of it, know concerning this great and
grand, because good, old man !
^ Wesley's "Works, vol. xii., p. 398.
^ Asbury's Journal, vol. i., p. 177.
2 Smith's History of Methodism, vol. i., p. 440.
Francis Asdziry. 249
The son of peasant parents, Asbury began to preach in ^777
Staffordshire, while yet a boy seventeen years of age ; and, in Age 74
177 1, came to Bristol to embark for America, without a single
penny in his pocket. His first text in America was in perfect
harmony with the forty-five years he spent in wandering
through its woods and prairies : " I determined not to know
anything among you, save Jesus Christ, and Him crucified."
As early as 1776, he made it a rule, besides travelling and
preaching, to read a hundred pages daily, and to spend three
hours out of every twenty-four in private prayer. Cabins of
the most miserable description were, in thousands of instances,
his happy homes ; and often, when his horse cast a shoe in the
wide wilderness, in the absence of a blacksmith's shop, this grand
old bishop of the American Methodists would make a piece
of a bull's hide, bound about his horse's foot, serve in the place
of iron. His daily rides were often from thirty to fifty miles,
over mountains and swamps, through bridgeless rivers , and
pathless woods, his horse frequently weary and lame, and he
himself wet, cold, and hungry. For forty-five years, when
steamboats, stage coaches, railways, and almost roads, were
utterly unknown, Asbury made a tour of the American states,
travelling never less than five thousand, and often more than
six thousand, miles a year, and this generally on horseback ;
climbing mountains; creeping down declivities; winding along
valleys, whose only inhabitants were birds, wild beasts, and
Indians; crossing extended prairies without a companion and
without a guide ; fording foaming rivers ; and wading through
the most dangerous swamps, where one false step might
have engulfed him in a boggy grave. Usually, he preached
at least once every week day, and thrice every Sunday ;
delivering, during his ministry in America, more than twenty
thousand sermons. His custom was to pray with every
family on whom he called in his wide journeyings ; and if, as
sometimes happened, he spent more days than one in some
hospitable dwelling, he was wont to have household prayer as
often as there were household meals, and to allow no visitor
to come or go, without asking, on his knees, that God would
bless him. Besides an unknown number of camp meetings
and quarterly meetings, this venerable man attended and
presided over seven conferences, widely separate, every year ;
250 Life and Times of Wesley.
^m and, during the same space of time, wrote to his preachers and
Age 74 his friends, upon an average, about a thousand letters. For this
enormous service, his episcopal salary was sixty-four dollars
yearly and his travelling expenses. Early educational advan-
tages he had none. Most of his life was spent on horseback,
in extemporised pulpits, or in log cabins crowded with talking
men and noisy women, bawling children, and barking dogs, —
cabins which he was obliged to make his offices and studies, and
where, with benumbed fingers, frozen ink, impracticable pens,
and rumpled paper, he had to write his sermons, his journals,
and his letters. Not unfrequently did he, like others, suffer
from the malaria of a new, uncultivated country; and had
headaches, toothaches, chills, fevers, and sore throats, for his
travelling companions. And yet, despite all this, Francis
Asbury was by no means an unlettered man. He became
proficient in Latin, Greek, and Hebrew ; read the Scriptures
in the tongues in which they were originally written ; was
acquainted with several branches of polite literature ; kept
abreast with the history of his times ; and, although not an
orator, was a dignified, eloquent, and impressive preacher.
Thin, tall, and remarkably clean and neat, — in a plain drab
frock coat, waistcoat, and breeches, a neat stock, and a broad
brimmed, low crowned hat, — this first and greatest Methodist
American bishop rode on horseback till he could ride no
longer ; and then might be seen often hopping on crutches,
and helped in and out of his light spring wagon as he still
pursued his wide episcopal wanderings. Thus lived Francis
Asbury, until, in 1 8 16, at the age of threescore years and
ten, he died, and was followed to his grave in Baltimore by
about twenty-five thousand of his friends. Before his death,
he solemnly enjoined that no life of him should be published ;
and that injunction, to the present, has been substantially
observed ; but, if the reader wishes to see his monument, we
invite him to step within the living walls of the present
Methodist Episcopal Church of America, and there, while
surveying the grand edifice of spiritual order and beauty, we
ask him, as the inquirer in St. Paul's cathedral is asked, to
" Look around ! "
This was the only one of Wesley's English itinerants left
in America in 1777; but, though forsaken by his English
Bishop Lowt/i. 251
colleagues, he was not alone. At this very time, there were i777
fifteen widely spread circuits ; thirty-four itinerant preachers, Age 74
who had been raised up by Providence on the spot ; and not
fewer than 6968 full and accredited members of society. In
other words, though it was only eight years since Wesley's
conference had sent out Boardman and Pilmoor, there were
already more than one sixth as many Methodists in America
as there were, at the end of thirty-eight years, throughout the
whole of England, Ireland, Scotland, and Wales.^
To return to Wesley, After the Bristol conference, he
spent a week In London, during which he drew up proposals
for the Arminian Magazine, and met the committee appointed
to superintend the building of the new chapel, which was now
ready for the roof.
He then, on August 18, hurried off to Cornwall; and then
to Ireland, where, at Dublin, John Hampson and Samuel
Bradburn had expelled thirty-four members of society, who
were so dissatisfied with this act of imprudent zeal, that
Wesley was obliged to go and give the contending parties a
two days' hearing. On Saturday, October 18, he got back to
London.
The week after, he spent in Oxfordshire. At High
Wycombe he meant to preach, "but good Mr. James had
procured a drummer to beat his drum at the window of the
chapel," and thus, instead of preaching, Wesley could only
pray and sing by turns, during the time allotted for the service.
The next week was occupied in a preaching tour in North-
amptonshire ; and the fortnight afterwards in meeting the
classes in and around London.
On November 17, he went on a flying visit to Norfolk ; and,
on the 23rd, preached in Lewisham church for the benefit of
the Humane Society, which had been established only three
years before, by Dr. Cogan and Dr. Ilawes. Here, of course,
he was the welcome guest of his old friend, Mr. Blackwell ;
and, during his visit, he dined with the celebrated Dr. Lowth,
bishop of London, whose brother had married into Mr. Black-
well's family. " His whole behaviour," writes Wesley, "was
worthy of a Christian bishop ; easy, affable, and courteous ;
* Minutes of Methodist Conferences in America, 1795.
252 Life and Times of Wesley.
iTll and, yet, all his conversation spoke the dignity which was
Age 74 suitable to his character." There is one incident, however,
which Wesley, in his modesty, has not related. On proceeding
to dinner, the bishop refused to sit above Wesley' at the table,
saying with considerable emotion, " Mr. Wesley, may I be
found at your feet in another world!" Wesley objected to
take the seat of precedence, when the learned prelate obviated
the difficulty, by requesting, as a favour, that Wesley would
sit above him, because his hearing was defective, and he
desired not to lose a sentence of Wesley's conversation.'
The remaining fiv'e weeks of the year 1777 were spent,
partly in the three counties of Bedford, Huntingdon, and
Hertford ; partly at Bath, where he laid the foundation
stone of a new chapel ; and partly in London, where he parted
with Fletcher on his way to Switzerland. He says : " We
concluded the old year, and began the new, with prayer and
thanksgiving. Four or five of the local preachers assisted me.
I was agreeably surprised ; their manner of praying being
so artless and unlaboured, and yet rational and scriptural,
both as to sense and expression."
Such was Wesley's watchnight service at the expiration
of 1777 ; no preaching, no exhortatory platitudes, but simply
prayer and thanksgiving, offered by himself and a selection
of his London local preachers. Wesley's successors have not
improved on this.
It was during this memorable year, that a society was
instituted, which was ultimately superseded by benevolent
societies that yet exist. Six friends in London met, at each
other's house in rotation, every Sunday afternoon, for the
purpose of singing and prayer only. They were soon en-
treated to visit the surrounding sick, and, finding many of
them in deep poverty, began to relieve their wants. To do
this, they found it desirable to provide a fund, by contri-
buting themselves, and asking contributions of their friends ;
and shortly a society was formed, sometimes called " The
Willow Walk Society, near Moorfields"; but more generally
and properly, "The united Society for Visiting and Relieving
the Sick." A few years later, the " Strangers' Friend Society "
^ Jackson's " Centenary of Methodism," p. 201.
" Sti'angers Friend Society T 253
was started. John Gardner, a retired soldier, in his London i777
visits, met a man in a miserable garret, dying of fistula. He Age 74
lay on the floor, covered only with a sack, without shirt, cap,
or sheet. The old soldier felt, as every one must feel, that to
visit such cases, without relieving them, was not worthy of a
Christian ; and, returning home, he got fifteen of his Method-
ist friends to join in a penny a week subscription for such a
purpose. His classleader, jealous of his class-pence moneys,
instead of helping, opposed the scheme. Gardner, with a
soldier's pluck, was not to be silenced b}' a subordinate, but
wrote at once to Wesley.
" Re\"EREND and dear Sir, — A few of us are subscribing a penny
a week each, which is to be carried on the sabbath by one of ourselves,
who read and pray with the afflicted, who, according to the rules enclosed,
must be poor strangers, having no parish, or friend at hand to help
them. Our benevolent plan is opposed by my classleader ; therefore,
we are constrained to seek your approbation before we proceed. We
are very poor, and our whole stock is not yet twenty shillings : will thank
you, therefore, for any assistance you may please to afford your very
humble servant, ,,^^^^ Gardner."
Wesley was the last man to stifle a project like this ;
and, hence, his answer "to Mr. John Gardner, No. 14, in Long
Lane, Smithfield," was as follows.
" Highbury Place, December 21, 1785.
" My dear Brother, — I like the design and rules of your society,
and hope you will do good to many. I will subscribe threepence a
week, and will give a guinea in advance, if any one will call on me on
Saturday morning.
" I am your affectionate brother,
"John Wesley."
The scheme was now fairly launched ; " Strangers' Friend
societies " sprung up in Bristol and other places ; Wesley
drew up their rules in 1790 ; and wrote thus in his journal :
" Sunday, March 14 — In the morning, I met the strangers'
society, instituted wholly for the relief, not of our society,
but for poor, sick, friendless strangers. I do not know, that
I ever heard or read of such an institution till within a few
years ago. So this also is one of the fruits of JMethodism."^
^ Set Methodist Magazine, 1845, p- 661.
2 54 Life aiid Tiincs of Wesley.
^777 Such then was the origin of the present " Strangers' Friend
Age 74 Society," which, until lately, was patronised by royalty,
and which employed, in i868, three hundred and fifty-two
voluntary, unpaid agents in its work of Christian benevo-
lence ; these good Samaritans, during the same year, paying
32,460 visits, relieving 6577 cases of distress, and, besides
blankets, flannels, and cast off garments, distributing £\(^26
14X. in ameliorating the miseries of "the destitute sick
poor, without distinction of sect or country, at their own
habitations."
Considering Wesley's wide wanderings, his daily preaching,
his supervision of societies, and his multifarious correspond-
ence, to say nothing of his publication of tracts and books,
the reader wonders how an old man managed to keep the
thousand wheels of his vast machinery in motion ; and, yet,
in the midst of what to others would have been an unceasing
and worrying bustle, he was almost as tranquil as a hermit.
The following extract from a letter, dated December 10, 1777,
is racy and unique.
" You do not understand my manner of life. Though I am always in
haste, I am never in a hurry ; because I never undertake any more
work than I can go through with perfect calmness of spirit. It is true,
I travel four or five thousand miles in a year ; but I generally travel alone
in my carriage, and, consequently, am as retired ten hours in a day as if
I was in a wilderness. On other days, I never spend less than three hours,
frequently ten or twelve in the day, alone. So there are few persons in
the kingdom who spend so many hours secluded from all company.
Yet I find time to visit the sick and the poor ; and I must do it, if I .
believe the Bible, if I believe these are the marks whereby the Shepherd
of Israel will know and judge His sheep at the great day. Therefore,
when there are time and opportunity for it, who can doubt, but this is a
matter of absolute duty .'' When I was at Oxford, and lived almost like a
hermit, I saw not how any busy man could be saved. I scarce thought it
possible for a man to retain the Christian spirit, amidst the noise and
bustle of the world. God taught me better by my own experience. I had
ten times more business in America (that is, at intervals) than ever I had
in my life ; but it was no hindrance to silence of spirit."*
Wesley's incessant labours were not the only thing likely
to perturb a human spirit. As usual, he was still the subject
of acrimonious persecution. In his sermon at the laying of
* Methodist Magazine, 1799, p. 564-
Wesley and Rowland Hill. 255
the foundation stone of the chapel in City Road, he gave a 1777
history of the rise and progress of Methodism, in which he Age"74
stated, that Whitefield, by conversing with Dissenters, con-
tracted strong prejudices against the Church, and that this
led him to separate himself from Wesley and his brother.
He also noticed the secession of Ingham from the Church ;
and the setting up of the college at Trevecca, which was
really a school for training Dissenting ministers. His object,
in all this, w^as to show that, though large numbers of reputed
Methodists had left the Church, he and his societies still
remained faithful, and were not deserving of the taunt of
having formed a distinct party. " We do not," says he, " we
will net, form any separate sect, but, from principle, remain,
what we always have been, true members of the Church of
England."
Whether Wesley was strictly correct in this will admit of
doubt ; but, unquestionably, he believed it to be the truth ; and,
as might be expected, it aroused the anger of his quondam
friends. Rowland Hill worked himself into a rage, and pub-
lished, in 1777, an octavo pamphlet of 40 pages, with the
title, " Imposture Detected, and the Dead Vindicated ; in a
Letter to a Friend : containing some gentle Strictures on the
false and libellous Harangue, lately delivered by Mr. John
Wesley, upon his laying the first stone of his new Dissenting
meeting-house, near the City Road." Wesley's sermon is
designated "a wretched harangue, from which the blessed name
of Jesus is almost totally excluded." Mr. Hill remarks : "by
only erasing about half-a-dozen lines from the whole, I might
defy the shrewdest of his readers to discover whether the
lying apostle of the Foundery be a Jew, a papist, a pagan, or
a Turk." He speaks of "the late ever memorable Mr. White-
field being scratched out of his grave, by the claws of a
designing wolf," meaning, of course, Wesley. He brands
Wesley as " a libeller," " a dealer in stolen wares," and " as
being as unprincipled as a rook, and as silly as a jackdaw,
first pilfering his neighbour's plumage, and then going proudly
forth, displaying his borrowed tail to the eyes of a laughing
world." Hill continues: "persons that are toad eaters to
Mr. John Wesley stand in need of very wide throats, and that
which he wishes them to swallow is enough to choke an
256 Life and Times of Wesley.
iTjS elephant." " He is for ever going about, raising Dissenting
Age~74 congregations, and building Dissenting meeting-houses the
kingdom over." "Venom distils from his graceless pen."
" Mr. Whitefield is blackened by the venomous quill of this
grey headed enemy to all righteousness." " Wesley is a
crafty slanderer, an unfeeling reviler, a liar of the most
gigantic magnitude, a Solomon in a cassock, a wretch, a
disappointed Orlando Furioso, a miscreant apostate, whose
perfection consists in his perfect hatred of all goodness and
good men." " You cannot love the Church," continues this
meek and elegant evangelist, " unless you go to Wesley's
meeting-house ; nor be a friend to the established bishops,
priests, and deacons, unless you admire Wesley's ragged
legion of preaching barbers, cobblers, tinkers, scavengers,
draymen, and chimney sweepers."
Has the reader had enough from the " gentle strictures " of
this young divine, not yet thirty-two years of age ? Let him
turn to the Gospel Magazine. In reviewing Wesley's sermon
at City Road, the Gospel editor describes Wesley's Methodism
as a "jumble of heresies, truly and properly called Wesley-
ism"; and nothing "uttered by Satan himself can be more
impudent and more glaringly untrue " than when Wesley calls
it " the old religion of the Bible, of the primitive church, and
of the Church of England." For him to say, that Lady
Huntingdon " labours to form independent congregations, is
as gross a falsehood as was ever coined at the Foundery
itself Mr. Wesley's apostasy from the Church is a chief
reason why her ladyship has justly discarded him ; and her
disavowal of him, of his Dissenting principles, and of his
sectarian conduct, is the true reason, why he has the insolence
to spit his venom against one of the most respectable charac-
ters that ever existed." " With a baseness hardly to be
paralleled, Mr. Wesley rakes into the ashes of a man, whose
name will descend with lustre to the latest posterity ; while
that of the Foundery wolf will moulder with his pilfered
writings, or only be remembered with contempt and execra-
tion. O Wesley, Wesley, hide thy diminutive head ! nor let
the most pestilent Dissenter in the kingdom arraign the
spotless memory of a Churehman, whose fervour and steadi-
ness of attachment to his ecclesiastical mother have scarcely
Calvinian Controversy. 257
been equalled in the present age, and never exceeded in any. i777
The truth is, Mr. Whitefield was too much a Churchman for Age~74
Mr. Wesley's fanaticism to digest. O ye deluded followers of
this horrid man, God open your eyes, and pluck your feet out
of the net! lest ye sink into the threefold ditch of anti-
christian error, of foul antinomianism, and of eternal misery
at last." 1
This was tolerably strong ; but it was not enough. The
same periodical, in its review of Rowland Hill's polite
pamphlet, begins thus : " Hob in the well again ; or pope
John once more in the suds ! Seldom has literary punish-
ment been administered with greater keenness and spirit,
than in this pamphlet ; and, surely, never was a punishment
administered on a juster occasion, nor to a more deserving
delinquent. When you take Old Nick by the nose, it must
be with a pair of red hot tongs." The red hot reviewer
reiterates the slander, that Charles Wesley offered the Greek
bishop, Erasmus, forty guineas, upon condition that he would
give his brother episcopal ordination; and continues: "Mr.
Wesley's vile ingratitude to the name and memory of Mr.
Whitefield deserves the abhorrence and execration of all
good men." Wesley is "an unfeeling and unprincipled
slanderer, a vile traducer," and, in fact, guilty of " an extreme
of malignity and baseness, for which language has no
name. ^
Such scurrility as this, heaped upon an old man, seventy-
four years of age, who had spent his long life in unparalleled
labours to honour God, and to benefit his fellow men, is
almost incredible. But even this was not the worst that the
immaculate Gospel Magazine provided for its readers. In
the same number, from which the above abuse is extracted,
there is a long poem, entitled, " The Serpent and the Fox ; *
or, an interview between old Nick and old John"; which
strongly reminds us of a scries of most infamous rhymed
effusions which will have to be noticed in the ensuing year,
and in which Wesley is always represented as a fox. The
poem now published was not only foul, but, in the highest
degree, profane. It would be a crime to reproduce it. Suffice
^ Gospel Magazine, 1777, p. 182. 2 j^jfj p_ ^37.
VOL, III. S
258 Life and Times of Wesley.
^777 it to say, that, as if to aggravate its infernal features, it
Age 74 immediately follows a really beautiful hymn of six stanzas
" To God the Holy Ghost." As a contrast, and to furnish a
specimen of the medley often found in this Calvinistic
periodical, we furnish the reader with the last verse of the
thoroughly good hymn, and the first verse of the thoroughly
bad poem. Addressing the Divine Spirit, John Stocker
writes :
" Thou my dross and sin consume ;
Let Thy inward kingdom come ;
All my prayer and praise suggest j
Dwell and reign within my breast."
We shrink from the task of so closely annexing to such a
stanza, the first, and by far the least objectionable, lines of the
ribald poem of "The Serpent and the Fox"; but historical
fidelity compels us.
" There 's a Fox who resideth hard by,
The most perfect, and holy, and sly,
That e'er turned a coat, or could pilfer and lie ;
As this reverend Reynard, one day,
Sat thinking what game next to play,
Old Nick came a seasonable visit to pay."
Then follows a conversation, in which Wesley proposes to
burn the Calvinists in Smithfield, as Bonner once burnt the
protestants, and the devil promises, that, while Wesley shall
be exalted " with state " to heaven's " third storey," all the
Whitefields and Hills shall be " turned back from the gate."
Quantiun snfficit ! of Rowland Hill, both in prose and
verse. What had Wesley to say to all this t In his journal
he writes : " 1777, June 26 — I read the truly wonderful
performance of Mr. Rowland Hill. I stood amazed ! Com-
* pared to him, Mr. Toplady himself is a very civil, fair spoken
gentleman! June 27 — I wrote an answer to it; 'not
rendering railing for railing' (I have not so learned Christ) ;
but 'speaking the truth in love.' "
Wesley's reply was a penny tract of 12 pages, i2mo, with
the title, "An Answer to Mr. Rowland Hill's Tract, entitled,
' Imposture Detected.' " He begins as follows : " In the tract
just published by Mr, Rowland Hill, there are several asser-
tions which are not true. And the whole pamphlet is wrote
Calvinian Controve^'sy . 259
in an wichristiaji and iingeiitlemanly manner. I shall first 1777
set down the assertions in order, and then proceed to the Aee~74
manner^ This is the strongest language Wesley uses.
Indeed, he writes as though Hill's pamphlet amused him
rather than otherwise. Some of his friends, however, were
not so lenient. Thomas Olivers rushed to the rescue, with
his characteristic fire, and unmercifully put into the hands
of the public a sixpenny "Rod for the Reviler"; and
Matthew Goodenough, a mechanic, of Bishopsgate Street,
published "A Letter to Mr. Rowland Hill," i2mo, 21 pages,
in which he tells "the reviler" that he had used a vindictive
style of which a chimney sweep might properly be ashamed ;
and, from his malign spirit and rude manner of attacking
Mr. Wesley, he might be mistaken for the chief of Billingsgate.
Hill, as a preacher, is taunted with ranting, and roaring,
and squealing, and bawling, and twisting, and twirling him-
self about like a merryandrew ; and is told that, though
"a Pelagian Methodist stinks," it was a comfort that the
name of Rowland Hill was "an odoriferous perfume, a charm-
ing nosegay, diffusing its fragrance wherever it appears, and
sweetly and effectually extinguishing the foetid exhalations
of Pelagian ordure !"
Not only in the Welsh cobbler, but in the Bishopsgate
mechanic, Rowland met with an Oliver ; but, like a beaten
bull dog, was not satisfied. He at once issued another octavo
pamphlet of 45 pages, entitled, "A Full Answer to the Rev.
J. Wesley's Remarks," etc., in Avhich he humbly apologises
for using too strong language in his former pamphlet; and
yet, with a strange inconsistency, commits the same fault
in this. Wesley is again accused of " pompous falsehood,"
" barefaced untruth," " ungodly craft," " of calumniating the
living, and traducing the dead." " For full thirty years,
Wesley had been travelling towards Irent, and was now
got to his journey's end"; w^hile Fletcher — poor Fletcher,
apparently dying of consumption — had "published, at the
end of his third volume, a most horrible manifesto, in
language almost blasphemous, and had forged my brother's
name" (Sir Richard Hill), "and mine, at the conclusion
of it."
But here we must leave this doughty warrior, to whom
2 6o Life a7td Thnes of Wesley.
1777 the very name of Wesley was what a scarlet cloak is to
Ace~74 ^^ infuriated bull. Some will object to the reviving of
these disgraceful reminiscences. Our reiterated answer is,
that, without them, it is impossible for the reader rightly
to estimate the character of Wesley. If they reflect dis-
honour on Rowland Hill, we cannot help it. Rowland Hill
was a public man, and, like all other public men, he must
be content to pay a public penalty for his public crimes.
Unfortunately, this is not the last we shall hear of him.
Besides those already mentioned, Wesley published, in
1777—
1. The sermon he preached, on April 21, at the laying
of the foundation stone of City Road chapel. i2mo, 47
pages.
2. An Extract from his Journal, from September 2, 1770,
to September 12, 1773. i2mo, 1 19 pages.
3. "A Short Account of the Death of Elizabeth Hind-
marsh," a native of Alnwick, "who died September 6,
1777, in the twenty-first year of her age." i2mo, 12 pages.
4. "Thoughts upon God's Sovereignty." i2mo, ii pages.
5. "A Sermon, preached November 23, 1777, in Lewisham
Church, before the Humane Society." i2mo, 24 pages.
1778.
NEVER in his life was Wesley the subject of a more ^77^
infamous press persecution than in 1778. Age 75
First of all, there was a pamphlet published, in which
Thomas Maxfield was pitiably preeminent. This men-
dacious publication asserted that, when Whitefield went
to America, in 174I, he handed over to the two Wesleys
thirty thousand people, whose hearts the Wesleys so turned
against him, that, when he returned to England, not three •
hundred would come to hear him. It further alleged, that
" vile contentions " followed, in which the Wesleys " raked
the filthiest ashes, to find some black story against their
fellow preachers ; " and that what had been published, on
both sides, by the friends of Whitefield and Wesley, within
the last six years, was a disgrace to all concerned.
Wesley replied to this, in "A Letter to the Rev. Mr.
Thomas Maxfield, occasioned by a late Publication " : 8vo,
1 1 pages. He states, with perfect truth, that, at the time
referred to, there were not five thousand Methodists in the
world ; that his own societies contained not more than
fourteen or fifteen hundred members, and Whitefield's not
so many. He declares that, so far from receiving thirty
thousand people from Whitefield in solemn trust, the latter
never delivered up to him one thousand, nor one hundred.
He admits, that division followed; but affirms that White-
field himself occasioned it. Whitefield first published a treatise
against him by name; but he made no reply to it. Wesley
asserts that Whitefield constantly preached against him and his
brother, both in Moorfields, and in other public places. Even
in the very Foundery, while Charles Wesley sat beside him,
he preached the absolute decrees, in the most peremptory and
offensive manner ; but, instead of returning railing for railing,
they always and everywhere spoke of him in respectful terms.
And then, with respect to the publications of the last six.
years, Wesley states that, though the two Hills, and Toplady,,
262 Life and Tiincs of Wesley.
^778 had poured upon him, in great abundance, bitterness and
Age 75 wrath, yea, low, base, and virulent invective, he himself had
published only three tracts during the entire controversy,
and in none of them had he spoken one bitter, passionate,
or disrespectful word. " Where," he asks, " have I, in one
single sentence, returned them railing for railing ? I have
not so learned Christ. I dare not rail, either at them or
you. I return not cursing but blessing. That the God
of love may bless them and you, is the prayer of your in-
jured, yet still affectionate brother, JOHN Wesi.EY."
Wesley's letter was worthy of« himself. True, his state-
ments, respecting his old friend Whitefield, are scarcely to
Whitefield's honour; but it must be borne in mind, that they
are not opinions, but facts; and facts not volunteered, but
extorted by the falsehoods of Maxfield and those with whom
Maxfield now associated.
Wesley replied to Maxfield; but the publications which
must be next noticed were properly treated with the silent
contempt they merited. We reluctantly advert to these vile
productions; and yet, for the reason already repeatedly
assigned, we must. Our notices shall be brief: first, for want
of space; and secondly, because we can hardly make quota-
tions without fouling our pages. The publications were
seven in number, all, except one, printed by a man of the
name of Bew, in Paternoster Row, on the best of paper, and
in the best of type.
1. "The Gospel Shop. A comedy in five acts: with a new
prologue and epilogue, intended for public representation, but
suppressed at the particular desire of some eminent divines.
By R. Hill, Esq., of Cambridge." 8vo, 88 pages. The chief
dramatis persona; are Dr. Scapegoat, Parson Prolix, Mr.
Rackett, and Simon Sycophant; and an idea of the whole of
this infamous production may be obtained from two lines
taken from the motto on the title page.
" Beware! these dire illusions ! strange to tell,
A gospel shop 's the very spawn of hell!"
2. "The Saints: a satire." 4to, 30 pages; with a frontispiece
made up of two scrolls, labelled respectively, " Inspiration,"
and "Election," a bottle inscribed with the word " Gin," and a
Infamotis Publications. 263
satyr's head inscribed "Perfection." A Methodist is described 1778
as a mixture of ignorance and folly, piety and hypocrisy. Age 75
The whole tribe are " downright scoundrels," " religious
mountebanks," " wretches who make a trade of religion," and
"show an uncommon concern for the next world, only to
raise their fortunes with greater security in this." Two lines
must suffice as a specimen, and, for the sake of decency, two
of the words must be given in a skeletonised form. Of
Wesley it is said, he
" Makes piety a b d to aid his work,
Outlies Sam Johnson, and o — twh s a Turk."'
3. " Perfection ; a poetical epistle, calmly addressed to the
greatest hypocrite in England." 4to, price two shillings. Of
course, Wesley was the hypocrite; and the work is orna-
mented with an emblematical frontispiece in accordance with
its foul and calumnious falsehoods.
4. " The Temple of Imposture. A poem by the author of
'The Saints,' 'Perfection,' etc." 4to, 35 pages. This, like all
the others, has a characteristic frontispiece, in which Wesley
is represented as a huge serpent, labelled "The subtlest beast
of the field." The serpent forms a circle, inside of which,
among other things, there are four books respectively in-
scribed, " Koran/' " Bedlam's Hymns," " Druid Hymns," and
" Ignat. Loyola Monita Secreta ^' ; also a gridiron, called
" Mahommed's Gridiron" ; a sword, inscribed "A Calm Ad-
dress"; a bottle, with a burning candle in its neck, and labelled
"Gin"; and two scrolls, one with the words "Old Light
at Mecca,^' and the other, " New Light in Moorfields." The
professed object of the work is to show, that, in tyranny, lust,
avarice, persecution, and imposture, Wesley is a successor of
Mahommed; and, in a bad sense, an improved edition of Igna-
tius Loyola. Wesley is accused of long seeking to be made a
bishop. " Of all impostors since the flood," he is denounced
as the very worst; while his preachers are "mechanic
missionaries, — bawling, crafty, illiterate wretches, sent out by
their priestly masters, to sow seeds of false doctrine and fana-
ticism, which spring up, throughout the country, in plentiful
crops of idleness, beggary, madness, and sometimes suicide."
' The words in the original are given in full.
264 Life and Times of Wesley.
1778 5. "The Lovefeast. A poem by the author of the
A~75 ' Saints : a satire,' etc." 4to, 47 pages. Here the frontis-
piece is a sort of chapel scene, in which Wesley, as a fox,
dressed in canonicals, is having a mitre placed upon his head
by the goddess Murcia, while a parson behind waves his WMg
and shouts " Hurrah," and another hurries away with an air
of disappointment and disgust. Wesley's Foundery is de-
scribed as "a spiritual slop shop," where he equips his "preach-
ing lubbers " with all the necessary paraphernalia for playing
their several parts ; while the preachers themselves are desig-
nated " the worst of scum," " smugglers of Scripture phrases,"
" learning's sworn foes," " Jack Cade's apostles," and " mere
conduit pipes of rhapsody and cant," The following are the
last lines of the piece, and are used concerning Wesley
himself,
"Feasts he may institute, raise lioly piles,
Degrade his God to win a 7nonarcKs smiles;
Permit corruption his false heart to taint,
Live by imposture, and yet die a saint j
But never while this hand can hold a pen,
Shall he escape the scorn of honest men.
Nor North, nor Mansfield shall the wizard S2Lwe,
But ridicule shall scourge him to the grave — ■
There let him rot, (so Becket did before,)
Proud as 2. pope, and faithless as a wh — re."
6. " Sketches for Tabernacle Frames." 4to, 36 pages. In
this, the frontispiece consists of Wesley, again represented as
a fox in canonicals, with the crosier of a mock bishop behind
him, and round about a library of books, which he is supposed
to sell, the shelves being labelled "Primitive Physic," "Poli-
tical Pamphlets," and " Prayers, Sermons, and Hymns."
Before him kneels a mechanic, with an ass's head, holding, in
one hand, a bottle inscribed with the words " Primitive
Physic," and, in the other, a pamphlet called " A Calm Ad-
dress," while the poor asinine wretch himself is having his
mouth opened by Wesley, who is about to indulge in the
agreeable recreation of extracting his teeth. At the top of
the picture are two portraits, one of James H., indica-
tive of Wesley being a Jacobite; and the other of Lucy
Cooper, indicating him to be something worse. The poem is
dedicated to the "Rev, Mr. Evans, Mr. Hill, and Mr. Hawes,
Infamous Picblications. 265
in acknowledgment of their services to the pubHc." After 177^
describing Wesley by such epithets as " a nostrum monger," Age 75
" a preacher, pamphleteer, and quack," than whom " few can
whistle off rank nonsense better," the work concludes with
the two lines following :
" His odious name should stink beyond the grav'C,
And truth proclaim him a recorded knave."
The reader has had more than enough of these dunghill
rakings ; but, in order to be saved from the hateful task of
returning to this series of abominable poems, we add another
published in the year following.
7, " Fanatical Conversion, or Methodism Displayed. Illus-
trated and verified from J. Wesley's fanatical journals." 1779 :
4to, 55 pages. In two different copies we find two different
frontispieces. One is an ass, on its hind legs, preaching.
The other is much more elaborate, and is too obscene to
be fully described. Leaving out the parts referred to,
Wesley, as a clerical fox, is represented as preaching in a
barn, his right hand in the coat pocket of a man called " Old
Cloaths," and his left taking a penny from a boy, a tapster,
who has just been broaching a hogshead of " Culvert's Gin."
One man approaches the preacher, with a cudgel, crying,
" Give me my money ! " Another, in the form of a donkey,
is making a most hideous noise, and is called "Brother Bray."
A third is vomiting a black monster, and represented as say-
ing, "He's gone, he's gone!" A fourth is standing on his
head, and shouting, " Sure I am in heaven." Two others
are hurling a squib at Wesley's head, and flourishing a scroll,
"For the benefit of Trick upon Trick, or Methodism Dis-
played." At Wesley's feet is the favourite bottle, labelled
" Primitive Physic" ; and in the centre is, what may be taken
as the artist's name, " Rowland Hill, 1778." The following
four lines, selected almost hap-hazard, are a very moderate
specimen of all the rest. Of course, they are spoken con-
cerning W^esley.
" Reynard, you're right ! Heaven loves such pious frauds ;
Hence, half your saints unmasked are who — s and b — ds :
Nay, mock apostles are but little less
Than devils lurking m fanatic dress."
266 Life and Times of Wesley.
1778 We gladly leave these disgusting publications. Like dis-
A^-j^ honoured children, they are without an acknowledged father.
Who was their infamous author ? We neither know, nor care
to know ; but there are three facts concerning them which
must be noticed. First, in almost the whole of them there
is a most virulent attack on Wesley's " Calm Address to the
American Colonies." Secondly, though irreligious to a
supreme degree, they are levelled, not against religion in
general, but against that particular form of it espoused by
Wesley. Thirdly, throughout, the Calvinists are either passed
Si^lf silentio, or with words of commendation ; and, in foot-
notes and other places, Rowland Hill is evidently in the
writer's good graces. We have read hundreds of tracts and
pamphlets published against Wesley ; but nothing which, for
profanity, pollution, and violent abuse, equals these. They
display talent ; but talent prostituted to the most infernal pur-
poses. In style, they resemble, — shall we say it .-* the style
of one of Wesley's most calumnious Calvinian opposers ; but
we charitably, though feebly, hope, that no man professing,
much less teaching, the Christian religion, had to do with
their production.
What had Wesley done to merit all this } Nothing, abso-
lutely nothing. He was an old man whose life had been spent
in one great act of Christian beneficence. These wretched
poems, issued in the best style of the art of printing, by J. Bew,
of Paternoster Row, were the foul sputterings of a muse, not
naturally ignoble, but envious of Wesley's majestic goodness,
and animated with a feeling almost as malignant as the heart
of Apollyon. So far from answering them, Wesley never
even condescended to mention them, in any journal or letter
yet made public.
Before we trace Wesley's wanderings in 1778, there are two
or three other facts which must be noticed. On Tuesday,
August II, 1778, in the thirty-eighth year of his age, occurred
the death of the Rev. Augustus Toplady. In more respects
than one, this was a memorable event to Wesley and his
friends. In the death of Toplady, Wesley lost one of his
bitterest opponents ; and Calvinism lost its ablest champion.
Soon after, the report was circulated, that Wesley had
stated, to some of his friends, that Toplady died in despair
Death of Top lady. 26 j
and uttering blasphemy. Sir Richard Hill rushed into print, 1778
by sending an anonymous letter to the General Advertiser, A^e"--
requesting Wesley either to deny the accusation, or to produce
his authority, otherwise his character would suffer, " for having
vented a most gross, malicious falsehood." Not content with
this, he published a pamphlet, in the form of a " Letter to the
Rev. Mr. John Wesley," in which, as usual, he made use of
the most intemperate language, telling Wesley that, unless he
cleared himself from the charge alleged against him, he would
be branded " as the raiser and fabricator of a most nefarious
report," and would be guilty of a sin little less " than the un-
pardonable sin against the Holy Ghost." The whole of this
mare's nest was simply this: Mr. Gawkrodger, of Bridlington,
told Sir Richard Hill, that Mr. Thomas Robinson told him,
that Wesley told him, that Toplady " died in black despair
and blasphemy." If Sir Richard Hill had courteously asked
for an explanation, Wesley, like a gentleman and a Christian,
would have given one; but, having demanded it in the most
offensive terms, telling him that he had been " vilifying the
ashes and traducing the memory " of Toplady ; and that
"his grand design in all his publications, whether sermons,
journals, appeals, preservatives, or Arminian magazines,
was that of trumpeting forth his own praises" ; and that he
was " a man of cunning and subtlety, and artifices, and foul
aspersions, and quibbles, and evasions,^' ^ — we say, that
Sir Richard Hill having used such terms as these, in the
very letters in which he requested the explanation, deserved,
not an answer, but, the silent contempt with which Wesley
wisely treated him.
In 1778, England was in great excitement. Panic was
general ; and the country was thought to be on the brink of
ruin. It was this state of things which led Wesley to publish
the two political pamphlets following :
First, "A Serious Address to the People of England, with
regard to the state of the nation:" i2mo, 28 pages; the
object of which was to show, that England, notwithstanding
the war, was in prosperity. Its cattle and vegetable produc-
tions were undiminished. Its inhabitants had increased a
' See memoirs of Toplady, prefixed to his works, 1857 edit.
268 Life and Times of Wesley.
1778 million within the last twenty years; and, during the same
Age 75 period, hundreds of thousands of acres of unprofitable land
had been put under tillage. England might have lost eight
hundred of its ships since the beginning of the war ; but it
had also taken more than it had lost. The trade with Ireland
had prodigiously increased ; and, comparatively speakings the
national debt was not so great as in 1759. "Friends and
countrymen ! " writes Wesley, "let none deceive you with vain
words ! Let none, by subtle reasonings, or by artful, elabor-
ate harangues, persuade you out of your senses. Let no
sweet tongued orator, by his smooth periods, steal away your
understanding ; no thundering talker fill you with vain fears,
of evils that have no being. You are encompassed with
liberty, peace, and plenty. Know the public, as well as
private, blessings which you enjoy; and be thankful to God
and man."
The second, and shorter tract, was published, with the title,
"A Compassionate Address to the Inhabitants of Ireland" :
i2mo, 12 pages. Wesley laughs to scorn the report, that
General Washington had an army of 65,000 men ; and
says, that " the French will as soon swallow up the sea," as
swallow up old England ; that the Spanish have not yet
forgotten Havannah ; and that the Portuguese were " not
such arrant fools " as to join in a confederacy with England's
enemies.
These were odd topics for Wesley to take up ; but the war
excitement was now at its highest point. Liverpool, Man-
chester, Glasgow, and Edinburgh raised regiments at their
own expense. The Whig opposition considered this to be
highly reprehensible, and accused -Lord North and the other
members of the government with employing soldiers with-
out consent of parliament, and of entertaining designs
dangerous to the liberties of the country. Fox moved, in
the House of Commons, that no more troops should be sent
out of the kingdom ; alleging that a war with France and
Spain was imminent ; and that the navy was inefficient, and
the militia contemptible. Burke, in a speech of three hours
and a half duration, — said to be the greatest triumph of
eloquence within the memory of man, — endeavoured to
weaken the hands of government, by dwelling on the
National Alarm. 269
ferocities and horrors committed by their savage auxiliaries 1778
in America, the red Indians. Lord George Gordon, who Age~7S
was not yet quite so mad as he became a year or two later,
expressed his earnest wish, that Lord North " would call off his
butchers from America, retire with all the rest of his majesty's
evil advisers, and turn from his wickedness and live." John
Wilkes, the ex-lord mayor of London, who had not yet
attained to the post of city chamberlain, but who was
engaged in constant manoeuvres to escape out of the purgatory
of duns, or to draw more money from the purses of private
friends, was as lavish with his sarcasms, ribaldry, and drollery
as ever, and told the minister, that nothing but a cessation of
hostilities would save General Howe from the fate of
Burgoyne. France was exerting itself to the utmost, to
induce, not only Spain, but also Austria, Prussia, Russia,
and the other despotisms, to become the allies and pro-
tectors of the young and free republic. The king and his
ministers were involved in the greatest difficulties ; and
John Wesley, like a loyal man, at the head of- forty
thousand Methodists, felt it to be a duty to assist them as
he best could, not only in private and in the pulpit, but also
with his pen.
Having spent the first two months of 1778 in London and
its vicinity, Wesley started, at the commencement of March,
for Ireland, where he employed his time and energies till
towards the end of July following ; but there was nothing in
the tour so tnmsiially remarkable as to demand attention.
The days of mob persecution were over ; and everywhere
Wesley was received with respect, and, in many places, with
affection. At Tullamore, where he preached in the riding-
house, the commanding officer ordered all the soldiers to be
present, and attended himself, with the rest of the officers.
At Cork, two companies of volunteers were present in the
chapel, while Wesley preached ; the side gallery being filled
with the men in scarlet, and the front with the men in blue.
In one instance, this old evangelist actually, we had almost
said cruelly, drove a pair of horses sixty-eight miles in a
single day. In another instance, coming to a slough near
Sligo, a sturdy Irishman took Wesley over on his shoulders ;
and others took his chaise. At Dublin, liis little conference
270 Life and Times of Wesley.
1778 of twenty preachers debated the duty of leaving the Estab-
Age 75 lished Church ; " but, after a full discussion of the point," says
Wesley, "we all remained firm in our judgment, — that it is
not our duty to leave the Church, wherein God has blessed us,
and does bless us still."
This discussion was brought about principally by the Rev.
Edward Smyth, already mentioned as a clergyman who had
been expelled from his curacy for his fidelity to the truth.
At present, he was in connection with the Methodists ; and
was now eager to persuade Wesley and his preachers to
separate from the Church ; but without effect. Myles, in his
Chronological History, says, that the minute adopted was the
following :
"Is it not our duty to separate from the Church, considering the wicked-
ness both of the clergy and the people? Answer. We conceive not.
I. Because both the priests and the people were full as wicked in the Jewish
church, and yet God never commanded the holy Israelites to separate from
them. 2. Neither did our Lord command His disciples to separate from
them ; He rather commanded the contrary. 3. Hence, it is clear, that
could not be the meaning of St. Paul's words, 'Come out from among
them, and be ye separate.' "
This was an important action. Twenty years before,
Wesley had wavered in his attachment to the Church ; now
and henceforth, in language at least, he was more decided.
This is a question which will repeatedly present itself in
succeeding years.
On July 19, Wesley left Dublin to attend his English
conference in Leeds, preaching on his way at Liverpool,
Bolton, Bury, Rochdale, Halifax, Bradford, and Birstal, at
which last mentioned place his congregation was supposed
to number twelve or fourteen thousand persons.
Wesley's notice of the Leeds conference is brief. He
writes :
"1778. Tuesday, August 4. — Our conference began; so large a
number of preachers never met at a conference before. I preached
morning and evening, till Thursday night ; then my voice began to fail ;
so I desired two of our preachers to supply my place the next day. On
Saturday the conference ended."
Mr. Benson writes :
" Our conference is just ended, the best I was ever at. Mr. Wesley has
been in a sweet spirit, has preached some excellent sermons, has had
Conference ^1778. 271
extraordinary congregations, and has dealt closely and plainly with the 17 7^
preachers, setting two aside for misdemeanours."* Aee~7i;
Thomas Taylor, in his manuscript diary, remarks :
" August 5. — To-day, we permitted all sorts to come into the conference,
so that we had a large company. The forenoon was occupied in speaking
upon preaching houses. In the afternoon, the sending of missionaries to
Africa was considered. The call seems doubtful. Afterwards, the com-
mittee met, and we were an hour and a half in speaking what might have
been done in five minutes. We are vastly tedious, and have many long
speeches to little purpose."
" August 6. — This day has been employed chiefly in stationing the
preachers.
" August 7. — We were engaged in conference till after one o'clock ; and
then the sacrament began, at which, I think, two thousand were present."
Three things are noticeable here. I. Others, beside itiner-
ant preachers, were admitted to Wesley's conference in
1778. 2. Long and tedious conferential speeches are not a
novelty ; but were inflicted upon impatient and unwilling
listeners in former days as they are sometimes inflicted now.
3. The conference had an immense sacrament such as
Methodist conferences and Methodist congregations now never
witness.
Stationing preachers was then a difficulty as it is at present,
one of the four days being chiefly occupied with this. Some
modern Methodists seem to think, that Wesley, in this, acted
as he pleased ; but that is hardly true. The people then, to
say nothing about the preachers, liked to have a voice in their
appointments; and then, as now, not unfrequently made
worse selections than others would have made for them. In
the spring of the present year, Wesley significantly wrote,
while at Bristol : " March 9 — Oh this and the following days
I visited the society, and found a good increase. This year,
I myself [ivhich I have seldom done) chose the preachers for
Bristol ; and these were plain men, and likely to do more
good than had been done in one year, for these twenty
years."
It is a curious fact, that, as this was the first conference in
whose minutes the name of Thomas Coke appeared, so also
* Christian Miscellany, 1 849, p. 84.
272 Life and Times of Wesley.
iJjB it was a conference remarkable for its discussion of the great
^~y- question of Cliristian missions, to whicli Coke, soon after,
devoted his unwearied Hfe. The mission to Africa has been
mentioned. Mr. Benson writes :
" The proposal was made in consequence of two young princes from
Calabar, in Guinea, who desired that missionaries might be sent to
instruct them in the English language, and the great principles of
Christianity. These young princes had been cruelly torn away from
their own country, and sold as slaves in America, where they remained
upwards of seven years. An English master of a ship, to whom they told
their story, pitied them, and advised them to run away from their master,
which they did, and were brought by him to England. Their case was
examined, and brought before Lord Mansfield ; and they were set at
liberty. They made some stay at Bristol, and were instructed by some
of our people, but especially by JMiss Johnson. After they had returned
to their own country, at their request, two persons, who were Germans,
but members of our society at Bristol, were sent out to Guinea; but they
both died either before, or soon after, they landed on that coast. The
young princes sent over petitions for others to go. Two good young
men offered themselves for the difficult and dangerous service. But,
after the matter was seriously considered, it was concluded that the
time had not arrived for sending missionaries to Africa."^
One of the strangers, who were present at the conference
of 1778, was Thomas Thompson, Esq., afterwards member
of parhament for the town of Hull, and who, at the first
missionary meeting, held at Leeds, stated that the dis-
cussion respecting this African mission lasted several hours,
and was marked by deep piety, sound sense, and powerful
eloquence. Mr. Thompson continued : " The deepest impres-
sion, however, seemed to be made, on the minds of all persons ■
present, by the short speech of a young man, who appeared
to be far gone in a consumption, but who promptly offered
himself as a missionary, and, in unaffected language, declared
his readiness to go to Africa, or to any other part of the
world, to which it might please God and his brethren to send
him."2
Who was this young man ? Though not absolutely cer-
tain, we believe it was Duncan McAllum. At all events, the
following information, hitherto unpublished, will be acceptable.
'Memoirs of Benson, by Macdonald, p. 75.
- Methodist Magazine, 18 14, p. 508.
Help for Africa. 27^
The two African princes escaped from slavery, about the 1778
year 1775, after the breaking out of the American rebelhon. a^75
One of them was baptized at Bristol ; and the other was
seriously disposed. The two Germans, who went out, were
brothers of the name of Syndrum, and were treated by the uncle
of the princes with all possible attention. When the intel-
ligence of their death arrived in England, Dr. Coke addressed
a circular to all the young itinerant preachers in the con-
nexion, asking for volunteers for this African mission, and
stating that they would be supported by a legacy of ;^50o,
left, for that purpose, by Miss Johnson, of Bristol.^ Duncan
McAllum was now in the third year of his itinerancy, and
was stationed at Dundee. With a brave heart, he offered his
services, even before the conference ; but, without assigning
reasons, Wesley declined accepting them. Hence the follow-
ing hitherto unpublished letter.
" Dublin, y^/)/ 14, 1778.
" Dear Duncan, — I would have you change once in two months, and
will help you as to the expenses. Dwell in the land, and be doing good,
and surely thou shalt be fed. You have nothing to do at present in Africa.
Convert the heathen in Scotland.
" I am, dear Duncan, yours affectionately,
"John Wesley."
So the matter ended. Help for Africa was deferred ; but it
is a blessed fact that Africans were being saved. The successful
efforts of Mr. Gilbert in Antigua have been already noticed ;
and it is a remarkable coincidence, that, in this very year,
when Coke first found a place in the conference minutes, and
when, for the first time, missions to the heathen were discussed
at the conference sittings, John Baxter, a Methodist ship-
wright at Chatham, felt himself constrained to leave his
friends, and to embark for Antigua, principally, as he himself
expresses it, that he " might have an opportunity of speaking
for God." He landed on April 2, and, a fortnight after, wrote
to Wesley, telling him that the work, begun by the late
Mr. Gilbert, still remained. He says : " The black people have
been kept together by two black women, who have continued
praying and meeting with those who attended every night, I
* Manuscript.
VOL. III. T
2 74 Life and Times of Wesley.
1778 preached to about thirty on Saturday night. On Sunday
A~7S niorning, to the same number ; and, in the afternoon, to
about four or five hundred. The old standers desire I would
let you know that you have had many children in Antigua
whom you never saw. I hope, sir, we shall have an interest
in your prayers. Dear sir, give me your advice. Provisions
are very scarce ; but I have all things richly to enjoy; as I
have four shillings a day, besides the king's provisions. I am
going to have a house built for me, with as much ground as is
needful. I think God has sent me here for good to the poor
souls, who are glad to hear, but unable to maintain, a
preacher." ^
Little more remains to be said respecting the conference of
1778, except that it was resolved " to receive no more married
preachers, because," says .Wesley, " we cannot keep them";^
and, further, that two most characteristic minutes were
adopted in reference to preachers who were nervous. It was
asked :
"Why do so many of our preachers fall into nervous disorders?
"Answer. Because they do not sufficiently observe Dr. Cadogan's rules
— to avoid indolence and intemperance.
"They do indeed use exercise ; but many of them do not use enough, —
not near so much as they did before they were preachers. And some-
times they sit still a whole day. This can never consist with health.
" They are not intemperate in the vulgar sense ; they are neither
drunkards nor gluttons ; but they take more food than nature requires,
particularly in the evening.
" What advice would you give to those that are nervous ?
"Answer. Advice is made for them that will take it ; but who are they ?
one in ten, or twenty ?
" Then I advise : (i) Touch no dram, tea, tobacco, or snuff ; (2) eat very
light, if any, supper ; (3) breakfast on nettle or orange peel tea ; (4) lie
down before ten, rise before six; (5) every day use as much exercise as
you can bear ; or (6) murder yourself by inches."
Wesley acted upon his own advice. Whatever might be
said of others, he was not the man to be made nervous for
want of exercise. Many Methodist preachers claim and
enjoy a holiday after conference. With Wesley it was other-
wise. The conference of 1778 closed on Saturday, August 8 ;
* Methodist Magazine, 1788, p. 383.
* Wesley's Works, vol. xii., p. 296.
opening of the City Road Chapel. 275
the next day, Wesley preached to a congregation of some ^77^
thousands in the market place at Dewsbury. He then hurried Age 75
ofif to London ; and thence to Cornwall, where he preached,
in Gwennap amphitheatre, it was believed, to four-and-twenty
thousand people. During this lengthened journey, he made
the following curious entry in his journal.
" September l — I went to Tiverton. I was musing here on what I
heard a good man say long since : ' Once in seven years I burn all my
sermons ; for it is a shame if I cannot write better sermons now than I
could seven years ago.' Whatever others can do, I really cannot. I
cannot write a better sermon on the Good Steward, than I did seven
years ago ; I cannot write a better on the Great Assize, than I did twenty
years ago ; I cannot write a better on the Use of Money, than I did near
thirty years ago ; nay, I know not that I can write a better on the
Circumcision of the Heart, than I did five-and-forty years ago. Perhaps,
indeed, I may have read five or six hundred books more than I had then,
and may know a little more history, or natural philosophy, than I did ;
but I am not sensible that this has made any essential addition to my
knowledge in divinity. Forty years ago, I knew and preached every
Christian doctrine which I preach now."
Let the reader ponder this entry for a threefold purpose,
(i) To form an estimate of the extent of Wesley's reading.
(2) To ascertain which sermons Wesley thought his best.
(3) To find an answer to the charge that Wesley changed his
doctrines.
Wesley, on his return from Cornwall, arrived on September
4 in Bristol, in the neighbourhood of which he spent the
ensuing month.
The remainder of the year was occupied in London, and
in his usual tours through the counties of Buckingham,
Oxford, Bedford, Northampton, Hertford, and Kent ; and it
maybe mentioned, as an evidence that the Church of England
began at last to appreciate its ejected minister, that, during
this interval, he preached, by request, to crowded congrega-
tions, in not fewer than four of the London churches.
It was at this time, also, that he opened, as already noticed,
the new chapel in City Road. On the day of opening, he
wrote as follows to Mrs. Penelope Cousins.
"London, November i, 1778.
" My DEAR Sister, — It is just as it should be. I have foniierly said
* I wonder how Mr. Whitefield can go on ! For he has honour, and
comparatively, no dishonour. And this is test for human frailty too
276 Life and Times of Wesley.
j««8 severe.' Now I have not that insupportable burden. I have honour
enough in all reason ; but it is properly balanced with dishonour. I have
Age 75 good report, and (what is absolutely necessary) evil report too. To-day
I am to open our new chapel. Hence also will arise both honour and
dishonour. Yet a little while, and all these things, that seem considerable
now, will pass away like a dream.
" I am, my dear Penny, yours affectionately,
"John Wesley." ^
The opening of City Road chapel rendered it necessary,
that Wesley should have clerical coadjutors ; and he now
received a letter from one who, in after years, rendered
faithful and valuable service. The Rev. James Creighton
was born in Ireland, in 1739; and, for fourteen years, had
been an ordained clergyman ; but it was only within the last
two years that he had found peace with God, through faith in
Jesus Christ, and that principally by reading the works of
Wesley. He now began to preach in a barn, about four
miles from his parish church ; and, then, when the barn was
no longer available, in a chapel which was erected for him,
and in which he officiated for some time, though the windows
were unglazed, and the mudden floor was such that his feet
often sunk two inches deep during the performance of service.
His parish was sixteen miles in length, and most of it mount-
ainous and boggy ; but he frequently walked, as well as rode,
through all parts of it, in all kinds of weather.^ While here,
he wrote the following to Wesley.
"Belterbelt, October 2(i, 1778.
"My dear Sir, — I stand much in need of a judicious friend. I am
quite alone ; there are none of the Methodists near me ; nor are there
any yet thoroughly awakened within my cure. The fault, I must own, is
mine. I have not been zealous enough ; yet, this has not proceeded from
the fear of man ; but I wished not to act precipitately, and to raise the
prejudices of the clergy as little as possible. I meant well ; but I see I
have acted wrong. Had I been persecuted, I should have been much
bolder ; but the people are so civil to me, that it has, in a great measure,
proved my ruin. I have had such a sense of my ignorance and inability,
that I have been frequently tempted to think, I ought to refrain entirely
from preaching. But, again, I thought I might, perhaps, be of some use
here, where the people are ready to listen to me, yet are not willing to
hear a Methodist. Could I once open a door here for the Methodist
^ Christian Miscellany, 1850, p. 54.
2 Methodist Magazine, 1 785.
Discipline. 277
preachers, I should willingly go to any part of the globe that God should
call me to. Were I near you, I should be too happy to fill the place of
your assistant. Though we must lament the want of discipline in our
Church, and though I admire the economy of the Methodists, yet I
entirely agree with you, that they ought not to leave the Church. So long
as they mingle with the members of it, they may be the means of con-
verting them ; but, if they separate, they will thereby stop the ears and
eyes of thousands. These were my sentiments long before I heard that
they were yours. I never was bigoted to opinions, and hope I never
shall.
" I remain, dear sir, your very humble servant, and affectionate
^''°^'^^^'' "James Creighton."»
The discipline of the Church of England was a thing (5ver
which Wesley and his friends had no control. With the
discipline of the Methodists it was otherwise. Hence, the
following characteristic letter, hitherto unpublished, addressed
to one of his itinerants, at Brecon, Mr. William Church, an
ancestor of the Eev. Henry L. Church, who possesses the
original.
" Wallingford, Ociober\% 1778.
"Dear Billv, — The soul and the body make a man ; the Spirit and
discipline make a Christian. Let John Watson and you agree together,
and be exact in this wherever you go. Insist upon the observance of all
the society rules, by all the members of society ; and on the observ-
ance of all (even the least) of the band rules, by all that meet in band. I
give, for instance, no band tickets to any woman, who wears either ruffles
or a high crowned cap. If any will not lay aside these, rather than lose
that blessed means of improvement, she is not worthy of it.
" I am, your affectionate brother,
"John Wesley."
Another unpublished letter, of the same kind, addressed to
Samuel Bradburn, will be welcome.
" London, October 17, 1778.
"Dear Sammy,— I think you judge exactly right. You are called to
obey me, as a son in the gospel. But who can prove, that you are so
called to obey any other person ? What I require (according to the
twelfth rule of a helper) of John Hampson and you, is, that each of you,
in his turn, spend four weeks, and no more, first at Cork, and then at
Bandon. When, therefore, you have been at Bandon, I desire you to
return straight to Cork. And, if John Hampson will not then go to
Bandon, I will order one that will. Pray show this letter to Mr. !Mack-
rie, whom I beg to assist you in this matter. Pass smoothly over the
^ Methodist Magazine, 1 7S8, p. 60S.
278 Life and Times of Wesley.
^11^ perverseness of those you have to do with, and go straight forward. It is
A _- abundantly sufficient, that you have the testimony of a good conscience
towards God.
" I am, dear Sammy, yours affectionately,
" John Wesley."
Reference is made, in Mr. Creighton's letter, to the subject
of the Methodists leaving the Established Church ; and it has
been already seen, that this was a matter earnestly debated,
at the Dublin conference, during the present year. The fol-
lowing letter, sent to Miss Bishop, is of great importance,
and, though long, must have insertion.
"London, October 18, 177S,
" I\lY DEAR Sister,— The original Methodists were all of the Church
of England; and the more awakened they were, the more zealously they
adhered to it, in every point, both of doctrine and discipline. Hence, we
inserted in the very first rules of our society, ' they that leave the Ghurch
leave us.' And this we did, not as a point of prudence, but a point of
conscience. We believed it unlawful to separate from the Church, unless
sinful terms of communion were imposed. Just as did Mr. Philip Henry,
and most of those holy men that were contemporary with him.
'"But the ministers of it do not preach the gospel.' Neither do some
of the independent or anabaptist ministers. Calvinism is not the gospel:
nay, it is further from it, than most of the sermons I hear at the church.
These are very frequently unevangelical, but they are not anti-evangelical.
Ytw of the Methodists are now in danger of imbibing error from the
Church ministers; but they are in great danger of imbibing the grand
error, Calvinism, from some of the Dissenting ministers. Perhaps thou-
sands have done it already; most of whom have drawn back to perdition.
I see more instances of this than any one else can do ; and, on this
ground also, exhort all who would keep to the Methodists, and from Cal-
vinism, to go to the church, and not to the meeting.
"But to speak freely: I myself find more life in the Church prayers,
than in any formal extemporary prayers of Dissenters. Nay, I find more
profit in sermons on either good tempers, or good works, than in what
are vulgarly called gospel sermons. The term has now become a mere
cant word: I wish none of our society would use it. It has no determi-
nate meaning. Let but a pert, self sufficient animal, that has neither
sense nor grace, bawl out something about Christ, or His blood, or justifi-
cation by faith, and his hearers cry out, 'What a fine gospel sermon!'
Surely the Methodists have not so learned Christ ! We know no gospel
without salvation from sin. There is a Romish error which many protest-
ants swallow unawares. It is an avowed doctrine of the Romish church,
that the ' pure intention of the minister is essential to the validity of the
sacraments.' If so, we ought not to attend the ministrations of an unholy
man. But in flat opposition to this, our Church teaches, in the twenty-
eighth article, that ' the unworthiness of the minister does not hinder the
Silas Told. 279
validity of the sacraments.' Although, therefore, there are many disagree- 1778
able circumstances, yet, I advise all our friends to keep to the Church.
God has surely raised us up for the Church chiefly, that a little leaven " '•'
may leaven the whole lump. I wish you would seriously consider that
little tract, ' Reasons against a Separation from the Church of England.'
These reasons were never yet answered ; I believe, they never will.
" I am, my dear sister, yours very affectionately,
"John Wesley."^
Whatever may be thought of the vaHdity of Wesley's
reasons, there can be no question, that, in theory at least, he
was still firmly attached to the Established Church. His
enemies, not without reason, stigmatised him as a Dissenter;
he persisted, that he himself and the Methodists were not
Dissenters. Who is possessed of competent authority to
decide the doubt .'' •
Before passing to Wesley's publications, there is another
matter which deserves attention. One of the questions pro-
posed at the conference of 1778 was, — " Is it not advisable
for us to visit all the jails we can .-' " The answer was, — " By
all means. There cannot be a greater charity." From the
first, this was a duty to which Wesley and his brother had
devoted themselves to the utmost of their power; and so also
had many of their preachers and followers, especially Silas
Told, a man who richly deserves a passing notice.
Mr. Told was the son of a physician at Bristol, where he
was born in 171 1. At the age of fourteen, he was bound
apprentice as a sailor; and, for eleven years, lived a life of
adventurous romance. In 1740, Charles Casper Greaves,
a young bricklayer, introduced him to the Methodists. In
1744, Silas, at Wesley's request, became the master of the
Foundery school, and received a salary of £26 a year. At
the same time, he began to visit the London prisons, and
to preach to debtors and malefactors. There was not a
prison in the metropolis, nor scarcely a workhouse within
twelve miles round it, where Silas Told was not a fre-
quent and welcome visitor. The scenes he witnessed were
horrible; but for these the reader must turn to Told's auto-
biography. Suffice it to add, that Silas Told was pre-
eminently, in London, the prison philanthropist, the real,
^ Wesley's Works, vol. xiii., p. 33.
28o Life and Times of Wesley.
177S though unrecognised chaplain of all its wretched prisoners.
•^ge~7S '^'^^ more than thirty years, no man was better known, or
more welcome in the jails of the metropolis, than he. All
sorts of criminals, papists and protestants, clung to him in
their anguish, for counsel and consolation. Notwithstanding
opposition at the first, he persisted in his enterprise, till even
turnkeys, sheriffs, and hangmen, as well as prisoners, were
wont to weep while listening to his exhortations and his
prayers. Silas Told continued his great good work, till he
tottered under the weight of nearly threescore years and ten,
when he peacefully expired in December 1778. It was be-
fitting that Wesley himself should inter such a Methodist. He
' writes: "1778, Sunday, December 30 — I buried what was
mortal of honest Silas Told. For many years, he attended
the malefactors in Newgate, without fee or reward; and I
suppose no man for this hundred years has been so successful
in that melancholy office. God had given him peculiar talents
for it ; and he had amazing success therein. The greatest part
of those whom he attended died in peace, and many of them
in the triumph of faith."
Several of Wesley's publications in 1778 have been already
mentioned ; only two still require notice.
The first was " Some Account of the late Work of God in
North America, in a Sermon on Ezekicl i. 16." i2mo, 23
pages. It was almost a misnomer to designate this a sermon;
but it was vastly popular, and, before the year was out,
reached a second edition. It is really a brief historical state-
ment of American affairs from 1736 to 1778. Wesley begins
with the colonisation of Georgia, passes on to the wonderful
revival of religion in New England, and speaks of the amaz-
ingly successful labours of Whitefield, but affirms that, for
want of forming his converts into societies, the far greater
part of them became backsliders. He then traces the war to
its origin, and concludes by foretelling, not the independency
of the rebellious colonists, which he says would be " a heavy
curse," but a restoration of civil and Christian liberty. It is
dangerous to turn prophet : in one respect, Wesley's vaticina-
tion was soon falsified.
On August 14, 1777, Wesley wrote: "I drew up proposals
for the Arminian Magazine!' We are not aware that these
Proposals for the '' Arminicin Magazine!' 28 1
"Proposals" have ever been reissued, just as Wesley published 1778
them ; and, as an original copy now lies before us, we insert a~7S
the document verbatim.
^^ Proposals for printing, by Subscription, the Arminian Magazine;
consisting of Extracts, and Original Treatises on Universal
Redemption,
" Conditions.
" I. J^ number, containing 80 pages, in octavo, printed on fine paper,
and with a new type, will be delivered monthly to each subscriber, at the
price of one shilling.
" 2. It will be so printed, as to bind up in volumes, twelve numbers
in a volume.
"3. This work will contain no news, no politics, no personal invect-
ives, nothing offensive either to rehgion, decency, good nature, or good
manners,
"4. The first number will be delivered on January i, 1778, and con-
tinued the first day of every month.
"5. Subscriptions are taken in at the Foundery, London ; the New
Room, Bristol ; and by the booksellers in town and country.
" To the Reader.
" I. Amidst the multitude of magazines which now swarm in the world,
there was one, a few years ago, termed The Christian Maga^ine^ which
was of great use to mankind, and did honour to the publishers. But it
was soon discontinued, to the regret of many serious and sensible per-
sons. In the room of it, started up a miscreated phantom, called The
Spiritual Magazine; and, not long after, its twin sister, oddly called The
Gospel Magazine. Both of these are intended to show, that God is
not loving to every man, that His mercy is not over all His ivorks ; and,
consequently, that Christ did not die for all, biit for one in ten, for the
elect only.
" 2. This comfortable doctrine, the sum of which, proposed in plain
English, is, God before the foundation of the world absolutely and irre-
vocably decreed, that ' some men shall be saved, do what they will, and
the rest be damned, do what they can,' has, by these tracts, been spread
throughout the land, with the utmost diligence. And these champions of
it have, from the beginning, proceeded in a manner worthy of their cause.
They have paid no more regard to good nature, decency, or good manners,
than to reason or truth. All these they set utterly at defiance. Without
any deviation from their plan, they have defended their dear decrees, with
arguments worthy of Bedlam, and with language worthy of Billingsgate.
"3. In the Armitiian Magazine a very different opinion will be
defended, in a very different manner. We maintain, that God willeth all
men to be saved, by speaking the truth in love; by arguments and illustra-
tions drawn, partly from Scripture, partly from reason ; proposed in as
inoffensive a manner as the nature of the thing will permit. Not that we
expect those on the other side of the question will use us as we use them.
Age 75
282 Life and Times of Wesley.
TJ'jS Yet, we hope, nothing will move us to return evil for evil; or, however
provoked, to render railing for railing.
"4. Our design is, to publish some of the most remarkable tracts on the
universal love of God, and His willingness to save a// men from all sin,
which have been wrote in this and the last century. Some of these are
now grown very scarce; some have not appeared in English before. To
these will be added original pieces, wrote either directly upon this subject,
or on those which are equally opposed by the patrons of particular
redemption. We are not yet determined, whether to insert any poetry or
not ; but we faithfully promise not to insert zsvy .doggrel. If any verses
are inserted, they shall be such as will not shock either the understanding
or the taste of the serious reader.
"5. We know nothing more proper to introduce a work of this kind
than a sketch of the life and death of Arminiusj a person, with whom
those, who mention his name with the utmost indignity, are commonly
quite unacquainted, of whom they know no more than of Ilermcs
Trismegistus."
This, though lengthy, is too scarce and too curious a docu-
ment to withhold from the Methodist community ; moreover,
it was the commencement of a magazine, now, we believe,
the oldest religious periodical in the world; a magazine which
has flourished, without interruption, for ninety successive
years; and has been read by myriads in all quarters of the
globe.
It has been said, that Mr. Walter Churchey, of Brecon,
was the first to suggest to Wesley the publication of this
periodical;^ Wesley himself says, that he had been desired
to publish a magazine for near forty years before he complied
with the request.^ Of course, Wesley is the best authority ;
still there can be no doubt, that Mr. Churchey was one of his
advisers. The following letter furnishes evidence of this.
"London, October 18, 1777.
"My dear Brother, — We agree, that no politics shall have a place
in the Arminian Magazine. But poetry will; only my brother and I
are the judges what pieces shall be admitted. It may be, some will
think us too nice in our choice; but that we cannot help. As to a
review of religious books, it might be well ; but I have two objections,
(i) I scruple my own sufficiency for the work. (2) I would not, at any
price, be bound to read over all the present religious productions of
the press. " I am your affectionate brother,
"JOHX Wesley." 3
' Methodist Magazine, 1823, p. 134.
' Wesley's Works, vol. iv., p. 107. ^ Ibid. vol. xii., p. 407.
'■' Arminian Magazine'" published. 283
The first number of the magazine appeared on the ist of ^778
January, 1778 ; on the cover of which Wesley said : Age 75
" I am content this magazine should stand or fall by its own intrinsic
value. If it is a compound of falsehood, ribaldry, and nonsense, let
it sink into oblivion. If it contains only the words of truth and sober-
ness, then let it meet with a favourable reception. It will easily be
observed, that it contains fewer articles than any other magazine. This
is not by accident, but design. I have frequently been disgusted by the
many bits and scraps of various kinds, which make up a great part of
most publications of this nature. Before one has well entered upon any
subject, it is at an end, and referred to the next number; a mere trick
to decoy the reader to buy another and another number. On the con-
trary, I shall endeavour to begin and conclude as many things as
possible in each number : and, with regard to taking the numbers that
follow, let every reader use his own discretion."
Space forbids any lengthened outhne of the contents of
the first volume. There are lives of Arminius, Luther,
Bernard Gilpin, Bishop Bedell, Peter Jaco, and John Atlay.
There are half-a-dozen articles on the Calvinian contro-
versy, some of them, (rather in contradiction of Wesley's
announcement,) running through several numbers. There
are fifty-nine letters ; and nearly the same number of poetic
pieces. There are three portraits, one of Wesley himself,
one of Peter Jaco, and the third of John Atlay. At the
end of the copy now before us, is a four paged letter,
dated Londonderry, June 5, 1778, answering objections
against the five numbers already issued. One objection
was, there w^as not enough for money. The reply w'as : " I
write for those who judge of books, not by the quantity,
but by the quality of them. I spare both my reader's
time and my own, by couching my sense in as icw words
as I can. Those who prefer the dealers in many words
may find them on every side." A second objection was,
that there was not variety enough. Wesley answered :
" Here is all the variety I promised. I promised the bulk
of the magazine should treat of universal redemption. Do
you blame me for not rambling from my subject.'' It is
not my manner, I do not aim at it." A third objection was,
"there is not variety in the historical part." "What do you
mean ? " says Wesley. " Would you have me insert bits and
scraps of history ; or give, in each number, part of the life
284 Life ajid Times of Wesley.
1778 of one man, and part of that of another? I never pro-
Age 75 posed this : I think it far better to select a iQ.\N of the best
lives I know, and to go entirely through one before I enter
upon another." Another objection was : " you have no
pictures or other decorations or embellishments which other
magazines have." Wesley answers : " It is true. But I will
tell you what I have : such paper as no magazine in England
was ever printed upon before. Consider! this one single
article costs more than all their fine embellishments put
together."
In concluding this notice of the first volume of the
Arminian Magazine, the following letter will be welcome. It
was addressed to Thomas Taylor, and is here copied from
the original.
"London, January 15, 1778.
" Dear Tommy, — As to preaching, you ought not to preach against
that unscriptural, blasphemous, mischievous doctrine constantly; no, nor
very frequently. But you ought, now and then, to bear a full, strong,
express testimony against it ; otherwise you are a sinner against God,
and the people, and your own soul. I have done this too seldom : scarce
once in fifty sermons. I ought to do it once in fifteen or so.
"As to writing or publishing, the deadly poison has, for many years,
been spread through England, chiefly by means of those pestilent
declamations, The Gospel, and The Spiritual Magazine. Whatever is
designed for an antidote to this poison must be spread in the same
manner. Thousands have been thereby poisoned already, and are now
twice dead. To guard those who are not poisoned yet, (not to get
money,) I fight them at their own weapons. I oppose magazine to
magazine, though of a totally different kind. But, it seems, you know
nothing at all of the matter. You do not appear to have read the
Proposals.^ This magazine not only contains no raihng, but (properly
speaking) no controversy. It proves one point : * God willeth all men
to be saved, and to come to the knowledge of the truth.' It goes
straight forward, taking notice of no opponents, but invariably pursuing
the one point. And this is the only way to preserve the Methodists,
and to make the Calvinists quiet. Meantime, both the letters and the
lives, which will make a considerable part of every number, contain
the marrow of experimental and practical religion; so that nothing of
the kind has appeared before. Therefore, a magazine of this kind is a
^ Taylor was opposed to the magazine. In his unpublished diary,
he writes: " 1777. December 14 — I wrote a long letter to Mr. Wesley
concerning the Arminian Magazine, which I am persuaded will do
hurt, and no good."
Errata. 285
new thing in the land; and those, who formerly spoke against the 1778
magazine, may, with a good grace, recommend this as being quite —
another thing, and published on other motives. I do not desire any ^
Calvinist to read it. I pubHsh it not to convince, but to preserve. I
know, by long experience, they will never bend, but when the war is
carried into their own quarters. This I will do, as long as God spares
my life ; and, in love, and in meekness of wisdom. This is the way, and
the only way, to establish lasting peace.
" But is it not odd that a Methodist, a preacher, an assistant, should
be the only one who sees my brother, and me, and the bulk of the
preachers, and the body of the people, to be wrong ? Tommy, distrust
yourself. Do not lean too much to your own understanding. It is
possible they may be right, and you wrong. You do not at all under-
stand this affair. We are well rid of those turbulent men. With love
to Nancy,
" Your affectionate friend and brother,
"John Wesley."
We only add, that, nearly to the end of Wesley's life,
Thomas Olivers was a sort of sub-editor, and corrector of the
press; but corrected so incorrectly, that, in August, 1789,
Wesley writes : " I chose a new person to prepare the Arnii-
nian Magazine ; being obliged, however unwillingly, to drop
Mr. Olivers, for only these two reasons : i. The errata are
unsufferable ; I have borne them for these twelve years, but
can bear them no longer. 2. Several pieces are inserted
without my knowledge, both in prose and verse. I must
try whether these things cannot be amended for the short
residue of my life."
1779.
1^79 '' I ^HE year 1779 was one of national alarm. The re-
Age 76 JL markable trials of Admiral Keppel and Sir Hugh
Palliser occasioned fierce debates in parliament. Lord
North and his colleagues were accused of being intermed-
dling, shortsighted, and incapable. American agents were
busy with Irish malcontents ; and armed associations, not
the most loyal, were formed in Dublin and throughout the
country. The Spanish ambassador quitted London, after
delivering to the secretary of state a hostile manifesto.
The ministry proposed, that the militia should be doubled.
Press warrants were issued in all directions, and press gangs
actively employed in increasing the navy. France was jubi-
lant. England rang with reports of invasion, and of new
Spanish armadas, more terrible than that sent against Queen
Elizabeth. Gibraltar was threatened ; and so was Jersey.
Paul Jones, at the head of a squadron manned by French and
Americans, and desperadoes from various other countries,
menaced the whole of the eastern coast of England, from
Flamborough Head to the Frith of the Tay. Lord North's
parliamentary majorities were dwmdling. George HI. had
no decisive victories to report. It was asserted that the
American war had already added sixty-three millions to the
national debt ; and Charles Fox declared that treachery, and
not ignorance, must have prevailed in the national councils to
reduce the country to its present miserable condition. England
throughout Avas in a panic.
In this emergency, as in all others, Wesley was among
the foremost to evince his loyalty. On February 8, he wrote:
" Finding many serious persons were much discouraged by
prophets of evil, confidently foretelling very heavy calamities
which were coming upon our nation, I endeavoured to lift up
their hands, by opening and applying Psalm xliii. 5, 6." Two
days later was the national fast, when he preached on
Abraham interceding for the city of Sodom. To quiet the
Prayer and Fasting. 287
panic at Newcastle, he took for his text, "The Lord sitteth 1779
above the waterfloods ; the Lord reigncth a king for ever." A^eje
In a letter to Bradburn, he says :
" It is the judgment of many, that, since the time of the Invincible
Armada, Great Britain and Ireland were never in such danger from foreign
enemies as they are at this day. Humanly speaking, we are not able to
contend with them, either by sea or land. They are watching over us as
a leopard over his prey, just ready to spring upon us. They are mighty
and rage horribly ; but the Lord that dwelleth on high is mightier ; and
now is the time, at this awful crisis, for the inhabitants of the land to learn
righteousness. I make no doubt, but you improve the important oppor-
tunity, and lift up your voice like a trumpet. Who knoweth but God may
be entreated of tis, as He was for Nineveh.-* Our brethren, in various parts
of England, have set apart an hour in a week for prayer (namely, from
eight till nine on Sunday evening), in behalf of our king and country.
Should not the same be done in Ireland too? particularly at Cork and
Bandon.? Those who have not opportunity of meeting, at the time, may
pray part of the hour in private. Meantime, there is a text for you : ' I
will not destroy it for ien^s sake.' " *
Besides this weekly prayer-meeting by the English Me-
thodists, a Methodist fast was observed in connection with the
annual conference. Thomas Taylor writes : "July 30 — This
day was observed as a fast on account of public affairs. We
met in the morning at five ; and, after the sermon, we
continued in prayer till nine o'clock. At one, we met again,
and received the sacrament. In the evening, we kept a
watchnight, and I gave an exhortation. But the people do
not stay at watchnights in London, as they do in the
country." ^
A few days later, we find Wesley holding a noonday prayer-
meeting, at Haverfordwest, to intercede for the king and
country. At Bristol, he preached on David's prayer, " Lord,
turn the counsel of Ahithophel into foolishness " ; and, in
October, wrote again to Samuel Bradburn as follows.
"London, October 10, 1779.
" Dear Sammy, — The alarm has been general in England as well as
Ireland ; particularly in the maritime parts. But it has done abundantly
more good than harm to the work of God. The children of God have
been greatly stirred up, and have been more instant in prayer. And
many men of the world have been greatly awakened, and continue so to
' Wesley's Works, vol. xiii., p. 117. 2 ]\i^nyscript diary.
Age 76
288 Life and Times of Wesley.
1779 this day. Most of those who have the fullest intercourse with God believe
our enemies will never be permitted to land in England. And, indeed, God
has already given abundant proof of His hearing prayer: first, in their not
landing at Plymouth, where they stayed gaping and staring for eight-and-
forty hours, while they might with all ease have destroyed both the dock
and the town ; secondly, in the malignant fever which has broken out in
their fleet, and already destroyed several thousands of men." '
Infidelity will sneer at this ; but religion, recognising a
ruling Providence, will reverentially bow its head. The crisis
was terrible. Sixty-eight French and Spanish ships of the
line, and many frigates and smaller vessels, all commanded by
D'Orvilliers, appeared off Plymouth. The British fleet did
not exceed thirty-eight sail of the line, and was absent at sea,
under the command of Admiral Hardy. Where was the diffi-
culty of seizing Plymouth.' Wesley writes: "They might
have entered it with perfect ease. The wind was fair ; there
was no fleet to oppose them ; there was scarce any garrison,
and the few men that were there had no wadding at all, and
but two rounds of powder ; and only two of the cannon were
mounted." And yet the combined fleet, nearly twice the size
of Hardy's, contented itself with a pompous parade in front of
the unprotected town. No wonder that Wesley, with grateful
exultation, preached from texts like the one he took at New-
castle : " The Lord sitteth above the waterfloods ; the Lord
reigneth a king for ever."
Before we track Wesley's wanderings in 1779, there is
another matter which deserves mention. On the 30th of
May, 1778, Voltaire died in Paris, in the eighty-fifth year of
his age. His death was what the death of an arch infidel
might be expected to be. The subjoined anecdote respect-
ing it has long been widely published, but, perhaps, never
so nearly traced to its source as now. Wesley had been
informed that one of the chaplains of George HL was about
to publish Voltaire's pernicious works in a collected form;
and, in a fit of godly indignation, he wrote the following
unpublished letter.
" yanuary 4, 1779.
" Sir, — In September last, a gentleman, near Bristol, showed me a
letter, which he had received from the Rev. Mr. Fletcher, at Paris. I
1 Manuscript letter.
William Shent. 289
Age 76
desired him to give a transcript of one part of it, which he immediately 1 779
did. It was as follows:
" 'Mr. Voltaire sent for Monsieur Tronclils, first physician to the Duke
of Orleans, (one of his converts to infidelity,) and said to him, " Sir, 1
desire you will save my life. I will give you half my fortune, if you wxW.
lengthen out my days only six months. If not, I shall go to the devil,
and carry you with me." '
"This is the man to whom a crowned head pays such a violent com-
pliment ! Nay, this is the man whose works are now publishing by a
divine of our own Church ; yea, a chaplain to his majesty. Pity but
the king should know it. If the publisher of that poor wretch's works
writes a panegyric upon him or them, I shall think it my duty to show
the real value of those writings.
" I am, sir, your humble servant,
J. Wesley."
No man was a more determined opponent of evil than
Wesley was; and, at the same time, no man was a more
faithful friend. The following is illustrative of this. The
Methodists know something, and might be told a great deal
more, respecting William Shent, the Methodist barber of the
town of Leeds. Poor William w'as now in not undeserved
embarrassment ; his friends forsook him ; but not so Wesley.
Hence the following, hitherto unpublished, letter to the
Methodist society in Keighley.
"London, January ii, 1779.
" I HAVE a few questions, which I desire may be proposed to the society
at Keighley.
" Who was the occasion of the Methodist preachers first setting foot in
Leeds ? William Shent.
" Who received John Nelson into his house at his first coming thither?
William Shent.
"Who was it that invited me, and received me when I came? William
Shent.
" Who was it that stood by me while I preached in the street with
stones flying on every side ? William Shent.
" Who w^as it that bore the storm of persecution for the whole town, and
stemmed it at the peril of his life ? William Shent.
" Whose word did God bless for many years in an eminent manner ?
William Shent's.
" By whom were many children now in paradise begotten in the Lord,
and many now alive ? William Shent.
"Who is he that is ready now to be broken up, and turned into the
street? William Shent.
"And does nobody care for this? William Shent fell into sin, and
was publicly expelled the society ; but must he be also starved ? Must he
VOL. III. U
290 Life and Times of Wesley.
1779 with his grey hairs and all his children be without a place to lay his
- head ? Can you suffer this ? Oh, tell it not in Gath ! Where is grati-
tude? Where is compassion? Where is Christianity? Where is
humanity ? Where is concern for the cause of God ? Who is a wise
man among you ? Who is concerned for the gospel ? Who has put on
bowels of mercy ? Let him arise and exert himself in this matter. You
here all arise as one man, and roll away the reproach. Let us set him on
his feet once more. It may save both him and his family. But what we
do, let it be done quickly.
" I am, dear brethren, your affectionate brother,
"John Wesley."
It is hardly necessary to track the steps of Wesley through-
out the Avhole of a journey which occupied the next five
months. He opened the new chapel at Bath, of which more
must be said shortly. On Friday, March 19, he preached in
Bengcworth church at noon ; and, at six, in the church at
Pebworth. At West Bromwich, during a terrific storm of
wind and hail;, he addressed a congregation in the open air.
At Madeley, he preached in the new chapel, built by his
friend Fletcher, in Madeley Wood. He opened a new chapel
at Davyhulme, Manchester. He also paid his first visit to
Oldham, where he says: " I had such a congregation as I have
not seen since I was in the Cornish amphitheatre. And all,
beside a few giddy children, were seriously attentive."
This was a great improvement in the manners of the Old-
ham people. When Matthew Mayer commenced preaching
here in 1763, he asked a man to allow him to stand before
his door. " No," replied the Lancashire savage ; and then he
swore that, if Mayer attempted to gather a congregation there,
he would cleave his skull. Having removed to the door of
Jonathan Mabbot's, in George Street, Mayer mounted a stool ;
but he had no sooner sung and prayed, than the mob, led on
by churchwardens and constables, surrounded him. " By what
authority do you come hither .'' " asked the Oldham function-
aries. " By what authority do you ask me } " replied Mr.
Mayer. "Pull him down, pull him down!" cried the mob ;
and then one of the constables upset the preacher's stool; and
the zealous guardians of the Church shouted, " We want none
of your preaching here." On the Sunday following, while
Mayer was preaching, the mob amused themselves by thrust-
ing pins into the legs and arms of serious hearers; and, on the
Methodism at Oldham, etc. 291
Sunday after that, a brute was hired for threepence halfpenny 1779
to strip himself stark naked, and rush into the midst of Age~76
Mayer's congregation. On another occasion, John Murhn was
dragged from his horseblock pulpit, and was thrown into a
dungeon ; and, on another, James Hall was honoured with
the presence not only of the constables, churchwardens, and
Oldham mob, but also of a huntsman and his hounds. The
churchwardens raved; the constables brandished their official
staves ; the mob bawled ; the dogs barked ; and the huntsman
blew his horn with such vehemence that Mr. Hall found it
impossible to preach, but, for an hour and a half, continued
to sing and pray.^
Leaving Oldham, Wesley proceeded to Northwich and
other places in Cheshire; then to Warrington, Liverpool,
Bolton, Rochdale, Bacup, and Padiham. He writes: "April
13 — At one o'clock, I preached in the shell of the house at
Padiham, where there is at length a prospect of peace, after
abundance of disturbance, caused by one who neither fears
God nor reverences man."
The chapel referred to, in this extract, was erected in the
midst of the most determined opposition. What was built
during the day was frequently demolished during the night;
and it became necessary to appoint nocturnal watchers to
guard the premises. At length, the building was completed,
and had, in the front wall, a stone with a sun dial, serving for
a clock, and round about it an inscription, which, to future
generations, was a memento of bygone troubles : " They
thrust sore at me that I might fall; but the Lord hath helped
me, and taken part against them that hated me."
From Padiham, Wesley went to Todmorden, Heptonstall,
Ewood, and Halifax. He writes: "April 15 — I went to
Halifax, where a little thing had lately occasioned great dis-
turbance. An angel blowing a trumpet was placed on the
sounding board over the pulpit. Many were vehemently
against this ; others as vehemently for it : but a total end was
soon put to the contest, for the angel vanished away."
"Behold how great a matter a little fire kindleth !"
Several of the Halifax Methodists, thinking that the sounding
1 Manuscripts.
292 Life and Times of Wesley.
1779 board would be improved by some sort of ornament, opened a
A£e76 subscription for that purpose, and, a fortnight before Wesley's
visit, procured the celestial trumpeter which Wesley mentions.
John Murlin, one of the preachers, determined not to preach
under the angel's expanded wings. Discussion sprung up, in
the midst of which Wesley came. The leaders were sum-
moned ; a hot discussion followed ; and the votes, for and
against the angel, were equal. Just at this juncture, John
Hatton, of Lightclifife, entered, and gave a vote for the angel's
removal. Immediately, the carved image was taken down ;
John jNIurlin hewed it in pieces ; and, before midnight, it was
burnt in the chapel yard. Great was the consternation of
these simple Methodists, when, at the five o'clock preaching,
next morning, they found their pet angel had vanished.
Quarrelling ensued ; and several influential members, in
angelic indignation, left the society which had destroyed the
angelic ornament, and, in some instances, remained to the end
of life unconnected with any church whatever.^
Proceeding to Haworth, Wesley preached, in the morning,
in the church ; but, in the afternoon, " thousands upon thou-
sands being gathered together," he was obliged to take his
stand in the churchyard. The next day, — Monday, April 19,
— he preached in the church at Bingley ; and then went to
Otley. " On April 24," Thomas Taylor writes, " I met Mr.
Wesley at Cross Hall, and found the old apostle as hearty and
lively as ever. The conversation at table was such as became
our religious profession. There were present two pious clergy-
men, two of my brethren, and several serious women. On
Sunday, April 25, I went with Mr. Wesley to Birstal church,
after which he preached to, I think, the largest congregation I
have ever seen in any place."^
At Huddersfield, Wesley found a great revival of the work
of God, sometimes " sixteen, eighteen, yea, twenty," being
converted in a day. At Leeds, Dr. Kershaw, the vicar,
desired him to assist at the sacrament. Ten clergymen
were present, and seven or eight hundred communicants.
At Darlington, he found some of the liveliest Methodists in
' " History of Methodism in Halifax."
^ Manuscript diary.
Mei/iodisiJi at Inverness. 293
the north of England. He preached in the market place, and ^779
all behaved well, except a party of the Queen's Dragoons. Age 76
At Barnard Castle, the Durham militia were assembled, — the
handsomest body of soldiers he had ever seen, except in
Ireland ; and all, officers and soldiers, came to hear him, and
were a pattern to the whole congregation.
He now made his way to Newcastle, and thence to Scot-
land, where he travelled as far north as Inverness. He writes :
" June 8 — I reached Inverness, but found a new face of things
there. Good Mr. Mackenzie had been, for some years,
removed to Abraham's bosom. Mr. Fraser, his colleague, a
pious man, of the old stamp, was likewise gone to rest. The
three present ministers are of another kind ; so that I have
no more place in the kirk ; and the wind and rain would not
permit me to preach on the green. However, our house was
large, though gloomy enough. Being now informed, (which
I did not suspect before,) that the town was uncommonly
given to drunkenness, I used the utmost plainness of speech ;
and I believe not without effect. I then spent some time
with the society, increased from twelve to between fifty and
sixty ■} many of these knew in whom they had believed ; so
that all the pains which have been taken to stop the work of
God here have hitherto been in vain."
A month later, Wesley wrote the following hitherto un-
published letter to Mr. McAUum.
"Epworth, Julyio, 1779.
"Dear Duncax, — This is the circumstance which puzzles the case :
who can preach in Erse but you 1 Cannot you then think of any
preacher, whom you love, and who is a zealous, active man ? Inverness
should by all means be a circuit by itself, including as many towns as
you please, north and south. I wish you would think of it, and send me
the plan to London.
" Did not sister Anderson receive my letter ? I wonder she did not
answer, Joseph Moore utterly denies he ever offered her marriage. I
desired her to tell me the very words he spoke or wrote.
" I am, dear Duncan, yours aftectionately,
"John Wesley.
" To Mr. Duncan McAllum,
at Mr. John Watson's, slater, Inverness."
' How is it that there are not more Methodists in Inverness now than
there were ninety years ago, in the days of good old Duncan McAUum.?
294 Life and Times of Wesley.
1779 Wesley spent nearly a month in his evangelistic tour
Age 76 through Scotland. Everywhere he was received with great
respect and affection ; and he speaks of many " times of
refreshing from the presence of the Lord." He was intro-
duced to several persons of distinction, and, among others, to
gossiping James Boswell, who writes : " Though I differed
from Mr. John Wesley in some points, I admired his various
talents, and loved his pious zeal. At my request, therefore,
Dr. Johnson gave me a letter of introduction to him.
" To the Rev. Mr. John Wesley.
"J/.ry.-^, I779._
"Sir, — Mr. Boswell, a gentleman, who has been long known to me, is
desirous of being known to you, and has asked this recommendation,
which I give him with great willingness, because I think it very much to
be wished that worthy and religious men should be acquainted with each
other.
'" I am, sir, your most humble servant,
" Sam. Johnson."
Boswell adds, that he presented the letter to Wesley at
Edinburgh, " and was very politely received."^
Wesley, in returning, reached Newcastle on June 22, and
would fain have rested in a place to which he was tenderly
attached. He writes: "Wednesday, June 23 — I rested here.
Lovely place, and lovely company! But I believe there is an-
other world; therefore I must 'arise and go hence.'" Accord-
ingly, next morning, he set out for Stockton upon Tees, and
preached all the way along the east coast of England till he
came to Great Grimsby. "Here," he says, "I found a little
trial. \\\ this, and many other parts of the kingdom, those strip-
lings, who call themselves Lady Huntingdon's preachers, have
greatly hindered the work of God. They have neither sense,
courage, nor grace, to go and beat up the devil's quarters, in
any place where Christ has not been named ; but, wherever
we have entered as by storm, and gathered a few souls, often
at the peril of our lives, they creep in, and, by doubtful dispu-
tations, set every one's sword aginst his brother. One of these
has just crept into Grimsby, and is striving to divide the poor
little flock ; but I hope his labour will be in vain, and they
will still hold the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace."
^ Boswell's Life of Johnson.
JMctJiodism at Hinckley and Coventry. 295
Having visited the societies in Lincolnshire, Wesley pro- 1779
ceeded to Doncastcr and Sheffield, and thence, by way of a^76
Derby, Nottingham, Leicester, Hinckley, and Coventry, to
London, which he reached on July 23.
Wesley had not preached at Hinckley since the year 1744.
What led him to visit the town now ? We learn, from the
unpublished autobiography of Thomas Dixon, who, at this
time, was stationed in the Leicestershire circuit, that, just
before the conference of 1779, he attempted to introduce
Methodism into Hinckley, and not without success. Accord-
ing to custom, he took his stand in the street, and began to
sing. The night was wet, and his congregation was not only
small, but seemed so apprehensive of the Methodist appari-
tion, that, while they listened to him, they also kept at a safe
distance from him. He preached again next morning to a
congregation somewhat larger, and then set out for Tam-
worth. This was his first and his last visit ; but a class was
formed just after, ^ which, in 1780, contributed nearly a pound
per quarter for the support of the work of God;^ and, from
that time to this, Methodism has had a place in Hinckley,
Then as it respects Coventry, this was the first sermon
Wesley delivered here. He says: "July 21 — When I came
to Coventry, I found notice had been given for my preaching
in the park; but the heavy rain prevented. I sent to the
mayor, desiring the use of the town hall. He refused; but,
the same day, gave the use of it to a dancing master. I then
went to the women's market. Many soon gathered together,
and listened with all seriousness. I preached there again the
next morning, and again in the evening."
As already stated, from Coventry Wesley went to London.
The entry in his journal recording the journey is worthy of
quotation. "I took coach for London. I was nobly attended:
behind the coach were ten convicted felons, loudly blasphem-
ing, and rattling their chains; by my side sat a man with a
loaded blunderbuss, and another upon the coach."
Before proceeding to notice the conference of 1779, two
other matters demand attention.
^ Methodist Magazine, 1823, p. ']-j-j,
» Ibid. 1S56, p. 234.
296 Life and Times of Wesley.
1779 Thomas Maxfield seceded from Wesley in 1763; took away
Age~76 with him about two hundred members of Wesley's society;
and became the minister of a separate and independent con-
gregation.i Yqx some reason, he now wished to return to
Wesley's connexion; but to this Wesley and his brother
objected. Hence the following letters, by Charles Wesley,
the first addressed to Vincent Perronet, the second to Wesley
himself.
" London, April 20, 1 779.
" Reverend and dear Sir, — My brother and I agreed not to receive
Mr. Maxfield again, as a fellow labourer, till he acknowledged his fault.
Ought we not to wait for some word, of his being sensible of his ingrati-
tude? Ought we to trust him, and the people to his care, without it ? I
have not the least spark of resentment towards Mr. Maxfield ; but to
dehverup our charge to him, unconvinced, is to betray them.
" My brother's interest with the bishop is great, (I believe,) but my son
Samuel's is greater. Sam and the bishop are, Ego et rex mens.
" Your very affectionate and ever obliged servant,
"Charles Wesley."^
" London, April 23, 1779.
"Dear Brother, — I still love Thomas Maxfield. I see some advan-
tages to us, as well as to him, from his return to us, provided he is first
convinced. Receive him unconvinced, and you will have to put him away
again, when perhaps it will scarce be in your power. One more trial, if
you please, we will make upon him, in a conference between us three.
Possibly we may gain our brother.
" I shall be happy to hear you have saved poor William Shent. Hopper
and others will, I know, draw in their horns while you are talking with
them, and be perhaps convinced for a short time. Give them back their
first love, and their first poverty, and they will not even wish to reign with-
out us. Peter Jaco, John Atlay, and John Pawson, might, I hope, be set
right by a friendly conference with us. They then would strengthen their
brethren, or recover them.
"Your defect of mistrust needs my excess to guard it. You cannot be
taken by storm, but may by surprise. We seem designed for each other.
If we could and would be more together, it might be better for both. That
I shall go first, I cannot doubt. The extraordinary strength, continued to
you, is a promise of your longer continuance. My strength and my work
are very near their end.
"Charles Wesley." ^
The above letter refers to another matter besides that of
the return of Thomas Maxfield. Charles Wesley was still
^ Atmore's " Methodist Memorial."
2 Methodist Magazine, 1826, p. 244. ^ Ibid. 1789, p. 388.
Lo7idon Difficidties. 297
jealous of the preachers aspiring after power, and especially ^779
of Christopher Hopper and his friends. He seems to have Age 76
thought, that John Atla}^ who was now the book steward in
London, and John Pawson, who was the London assistant,
and Peter Jaco, who was a London supernumerary, "might be
set right by a friendly conference"; but of the other London
preachers, including Thomas Rankin and Thomas Coke, he
was in doubt. He properly enough gives himself credit for
an excess of caution ; but, perhaps wrongly, thinks his brother
had not enough of it.
This was another important crisis in the history of the two
Wesleys. It was only a few months before, that City Road
chapel had been opened. Charles Wesley, Thomas Coke,
John Richardson, and John Abraham, were its officiating
clergymen; but John Pawson, Thomas Rankin, Thomas
Tennant, and Peter Jaco, were itinerant preachers, appointed
by the conference of 1778, to the London circuit, of which
the chapel in City Road was now a part. What was the
result .'' Jealousies sprung up, indirectly referred to in the
above letter, but mentioned in greater detail in another letter
to be presently inserted. Before, however, that letter is in-
troduced, perhaps the following extracts from John Pawson's
unpublished manuscript memoir of Dr, Whitehead will be
acceptable, and will cast light on Wesley's difficulties. Mr.
Pawson writes:
" I was perhaps as well acquainted with the two brothers as any man
now living. That Mr. Charles Wesley was of a very suspicious temper is
certainly true ; and that Mr. John Wesley had far more charity, in judging
of persons in general, (except the rich and great,) than his brother had, is
equally true. But that he was so apt to be taken in with appearances is
not true. He was v.ell able to form a judgment of particular persons,
and was as seldom mistaken as his brother. I once heard him pleasantly
say: 'My brother suspects everybody, and he is continually imposed
upon; but I suspect nobody, and I am never imposed upon.' It is well
known that Mr. Charles Wesley was much prejudiced in favour of the
clergy, through the whole course of his life, and that it was nothing but
hard necessity that obliged him, in any degree, to continue the lay
preachers. He must have been blind indeed not to have seen, that God
had given to many of them, at least, very considerable ministerial gifts,
and that He attended their labours with great success ; but I am well
persuaded, that, could he have found a sufficient number of clergymen to
have carried on the work of God, he would soon have disowned all the
298 Life and Times of Wesley.
lyyo lay preachers. He was glad of their assistance when he did not choose
to preach himself; and, accordingly, on a Sunday evening, he would
S^ ' always have a lay preacher appointed as well as himself, lest a shower of
rain, or an agreeable visit, should prevent his attendiiig. At a conference
held in Bristol many years ago, about a dozen clergymen attended for the
purpose of convincing us, that we ought not to preach in any parish that
was favoured with a gospel minister. Mr. Charles Wesley took part with
them, and said, 'If I was stationed in any particular parish, you should
not preach there.' INIr. John Hampson replied, ' I would preach there,
and never ask your leave ; and I should think I had as good a right for
doing so, as you had.' Mr. Charles answered in great anger, 'You are a
grievous wolf: you will tear the flock when my brother and myself are
dead, unless God give you repentance.' Mr. Charles was inclined to find
out and magnify any supposed fault in the lay preachers ; but his brother
treated them with respect, and exercised a fatherly care over them. I am
persuaded that, from the creation of the world, there never existed a body
of men who looked up to any single person with a more profound degree
ofreverer.ee than the preachers did to Mr. Wesley; and I am bold to say,
that never did any man, no, not St. Paul himself, possess so high a degree
of power over so large a body of men as was possessed by him. He used
his power, however, for the edification of the people, and abused it as
little perhaps as any one man ever did. When any difficulty occurred in
governing the preachers, it soon vanished. The oldest, the very best,
and those of them that had the greatest influence, were ever ready to
unite with him, and to assist him to the utmost of their power. The
truth is, if the preachers were in any danger at all, it was of calling Mr.
Wesley ' Rabbi/ and implicitly obeying him in whatsoever he thought
proper to command.
"Dr. Whitehead informs his readers, that a party existed among the
preachers, who wished for a total separation from the Established Church,
and for the Methodists to be formed into an independent body ; and
represents Dr. Coke as being at the head of that party. I am well assured,
that this is incorrect. The preachers only wished, that the people, who
had grown weary of seeking the living among the dead, and of asking
bread of those who they well knew had only a stone to give them, might
be indulged with the lively ordinances of God ; and some of the people
thought it very unjust, not to say cruel, that their ministers did not grant
them the privilege of worshipping God at those particular times of the
Lord's day, when both body and mind were best prepared for so doing.
It is true, that a party existed, both among the preachers and people, who
were inclined to believe, that those whom God had called to preach might
lawfully administer the sacraments ; as they were not able to perceive
that it required a greater degree of wisdom and piety to qualify a person
to baptize a child than to preach the word of God. They likewise had
scruples whether it was right to wish those ministers God speed, by
attending their ministry, whom, they felt convinced, God had never sent.
But, at the same time, the preachers knew, that there never was among
themselves a sufficient number of acceptable men to supply all the
Age 76
London Difficulties. 299
Methodist congregations ; and that, if there had been, and if an entire 1779
separation from the Church had taken place, the Methodists were too
poor to support such a multitude of ministers. Common prudence, there-
fore, prevented them from wishing for that which they knew could not be
accomplished."
These are important statements, coming from a man of
Mr. Pawson's ministerial standing, and who was one of
Wesley's itinerant preachers during the last twenty-nine
years of Wesley's life. They could be easily extended ; but,
perhaps, enough has been said, to show that the feeling,
between Charles Wesley and the preachers, was not of the
most friendly kind ; and this will prepare the reader for the
following letter, which Charles, at this period, addressed to
his brother.
" London, June 16, 1779.
"Dear Brother, — Mr. B. has been lately with the committee, and
was there informed, that our preachers (the three principal ') have written
to the country preachers heavy complaints of their ill usage by the clergy
here ; not, I should suppose, by quiet John Richardson, — not by passive
Dr. Coke, for he, they say, is gone to Bristol, that he may not be a witness
of their cruel persecutioji. The persecuting clergy, therefore, are neither
more nor less than your own brother Charles, and the whole ground of
their complaint against me is, 'my serving the chapel on Sunday after-
noon, as well as in the morning.'
" But this is no new grievance ; for I constantly preached Sunday
morning and afternoon at Bristol. If they could exclude me here, they
would not long permit me there.
'• My reasons for preaching at the new chapel twice every Sunday are :
I. Because, after you, I have the best right. 2. Because I have so short
a time to preach anywhere. 3. Because I am fully persuaded I can do
more good there than in any other place. They, I know, are of a different
judgment, and make no secret of it, declaring everywhere, * that the work
is stopping ; the society scattering ; and the congregation at the new
chapel dwindled away and quite dead.'
" I thank God, the chapel is well filled. Last Sunday I preached twice,
never with greater, and seldom with equal, effect. After sermon, Mr.
Rankin followed me to the vestry to assure me, ' he had never spoken
disrespectfully of us, and that he was a great friend to the Church.' At
the same time, a gentlewoman came, filled with faith and love by the word
just spoken. I turned aside to let Mr. Rankin examine her. She said
that, a month ago, she w^as brought up out of the pit of despair, under my
^ These were Pawson, Rankin, and Jaco. The committee consisted of
gentlemen appointed to manage the business of City Road chapel. — •
(Pawson's manuscript.)
300 Life and Times of Wesley.
"i^ll^ word. He repeated his inquiries, and she her answers, to his satisfaction
. "T^nfi shall I say, or dissatisfaction ? I would hope the former. You will inquire
when here (only not of the preachers), and judge for yourself whether my
persevering ministry at the chapel has done good or hurt.
" I think the preachers wrong, and in the greatest danger through pride ;
but I have, and will have, no quarrel with them. Mr. Kemp proposed to
carry me to meet you on the last day's journey, or I should not have
thought of it. I do not want to have the first word. Let them have the
first and last. I do not want to interfere in that government of yours, or
to appear at all at the congress. A word of yours might turn the scale,
and send me directly to Bristol.
" It is just come into my mind, * The lay preachers affect to beUeve I
act as a clergyman in opposition to them.' To me, it seems that I act as
I do, in goodwill to them, as well as to the people. If there was no man
above them, what would become of them ? How would they tear one
another in pieces ! Convince them, if you can, that they want a clergyman
over them, to keep them and the flock together. Convince them, that it is
impossible I should stand in their way long, for I cannot (should I live to
the winter) serve the new chapel Sundays and holydays in all weathers.
Persuade each of them to be the least, not the greatest ; and then all will
be right again. You have no alternative but to conquer that spirit, or to
be conquered by it. Can you think, I envy you your pre-eminence ? If
God continues my strength, I shall take the best care of the chapel till you
return. Then I shall deliver up my charge to you, and you alone.
" Charles Wesley." ^
This peevish epistle, published in Wesley's own Anninian
Magazine, will not add to the fair fame of Methodism's great
hymnist. It was an unworthy production of a pen which
wrote hundreds, in fact, thousands, of sweet songs of praise.
John Pawson — good, but gossiping, — and Thomas Rankin —
honest to the heart's inmost core, but somewhat obstinate and
overbearing, — were far from perfect ; but was it just in
Charles Wesley to write to his brother respecting them in the
querulous tone in which he did } Charles Wesley says, the
City Road chapel was well filled ; Pawson says, in the
manuscript memoir of Dr. Whitehead, that " the congregation
fell off exceedingly ; and that the society was brought into
great disorder." Charles Wesley was a scholar, and, as a
sacred poet, was without a peer ; but we incline to think, that
John Pawson and Thomas Rankin were more popular and
powerful preachers than either he or any other of his City
Road clerical colleagues ; and it is not surprising, that the
'^ Methodist Magazine, 1789, p. 441.
Charles Wesley.
people wished to hear them on Sundays as well as week days; i779
and that the itinerants themselves, — one of whom was the Age 76
appointed superintendent of the London circuit, and the other
of whom had been Wesley's chosen superintendent of the
whole of the Methodist societies in America, — should think
they had quite as much right as Charles Wesley, Thomas
Coke, John Richardson, or John Abraham, to preach to
Sunday congregations in City Road. The truth is, though,
in years past, Charles Wesley's ministry had been exceedingly
attractive and powerful, it was now, what shall we say ? John
Pawson writes: "When he was favoured with freedom of
mind, which was but seldom, then his preaching w^as truly
profitable ; but, in general, it was exceedingly dry and
lifeless." His sons Charles and Samuel, — the former twenty-
one years of age, and the latter thirteen, — were, by their
musical genius, creating a sensation in the highest circles of
London society ; and, for several years, conducted in their
father's house a series of domestic subscription concerts,
of twelve nights' continuance, in each season. Their father
thoroughly approved of this. " I am clear," says he,
" without a doubt, that my sons' concert is after the will
and order of Providence." W^esley appends to this a note :
" I am clear of another mind." 1 Without staying to settle
the dispute, there can be no doubt that, by these concerts,
Charles Wesley was brought into the society of a large number
of the rich and great. The simple minded London Methodists
were staggered at one of their great leaders having such musical
performances in his house, and at his mingling with persons,
who, though highly genteel, w^ere not religious. Many began
to regard him with suspicion ; his preaching popularity
was waning ; Pawson says, " he was like Samson shorn
of his strength " ; his health also w^as failing ; like most
men of high poetic genius, he was subject to melancholy
moods : put all these things together, and the petulancy and
suspicion of Charles Wesley's letter to his brother will net
excite surprise.
This then was the state of things awaiting the venerable
Wesley, on his return to London, after a laborious preaching
^ Methodist Magazine, 1789, p. 387.
302 Life and Times of Wesley.
1779 tour of five months' duration. By an almost superhuman
Age76 effort, he had built and opened his new chapel in City
Road ; but things, instead of being more prosperous than
ever, were in a state of disastrous commotion. In this, the
first year after the chapel was opened, there was a decrease of
one hundred and twenty-three members in the London circuit,
though that circuit had now an unprecedented staff of ordained
clergymen, and four of the best itinerants in Wesley's con-
nexion. Ordinary men would have been discouraged and at
their wits' end ; but not so the man who was born, not to be
conquered by difficulties, but to conquer them.
Wesley's conference of 1779 was commenced on August 3 ;
and it was now ascertained, that nineteen other circuits besides
London had a decrease of members. Wesley asked, How
can we account for this "i The reasons assigned were : — •
I. Partly the neglect of outdoor preaching, and of trying new
places. 2, Partly prejudice against the king, and speaking
evil of dignities. 3. But chiefly the increase of worldly
mindedness, and conformity to the world. It was also
resolved, that no one speaking evil of those in authority, or
prophesying evil to the nation, should be a Methodist preacher.
Itinerants were reproved for hastening home to their wives
after preaching ; and were told, they ought never to do this
till they had met the society. To revive the work in Scot-
land, the preachers were directed to preach in the open air as
much as possible ; to try every town and village ; and to visit
every member of society at home.
As soon as the conference was ended, Wesley set out, with
his brother and his family, for Wales, where he spent a fort-
night in preaching to large and deeply affected congregations.
He then proceeded to the west of England. At Exeter,
he writes : " I preached in a convenient room, lately a school ;
I suppose formerly a chapel. It is both neat and solemn, and
is believed to contain four or five hundred people."
This was the meeting-house concerning which Wesley
wrote to Samuel Wells, the assistant of the Tiverton circuit,
as follows.
" London, January 28, 1 779.
"Dear Sammy, — According to the act of toleration — i. You are
required to certify to the registrar of the bishop's court, or the justices,
Alcxande;^ M'Nad. 303
the place of your meeting for Divine worship. This is all you have to do. ^779
You ask nothing at all of the bishop or justices. A'^76
" 2. The registrar, or clerk of the court, is required to register the
same, and to give a certificate thereof to such persons as shall demand
the same ; for which there shall be no greater fee or reward taken than
sixpence.
" I advise you to go once more to the sessions, and say, ' Gentlemen,
•u'e have had advice from London ; we desire nothing at all oi yoic ; but
we demand of your clerk to register this place, and to give us a certificate
thereof ; or to answer the refusal at his peril.'
"Answer no questions to the justices, or lawyers, but with a bow, and
with repeating the words, ' Our business is only with your clerk ; we
demand of him what the act requires him to do.'
" If you judge proper, you may show this to any of the justices. What
I have written, I am ready to defend.
" You have led the justices into the mistake, by your manner of address-
ing them. Beware of this for the time to come. You have nothing to
ask of tJiem.
"John Wesley."^
On September 4, Wesley returned to Bristol, where he
spent a month in visiting the surrounding societies. He
then made his way to London, preaching at Devizes, Win-
chester, and Portsmouth. On leaving London, he slept, for
the last time, in the old Foundery. He now, for the first
time slept in the house, in which he afterwards died, in City
Road.
On October 11, he began his preaching tour to Northamp-
tonshire; a week later to Sussex; and a week later still to
Norfolk. He then commenced his annual examination of the
London society, and writes: "I did not find such an increase
as I expected. Nay, there was a considerable decrease,
plainly owing to a senseless jealousy that had crept in
between our preachers."
This doubtless refers to the quarrel already mentioned.
Unfortunately, the strife was now extended to Bath. The
assistant appointed at the late conference to the Bristol
circuit (of which Bath was part), was Alexander M'Nab, a
native of Perthshire, in North Britain, and now in the thirty-
fourth year of his age. For thirteen years, he had been
an itinerant preacher, and had laboured^ with considerable
"^ Melhodist Magazine, 1825, p. 456.
)04 Life and Times of Wesley.
1779 success, in the three kingdoms.' Wesley, writing to Lady
^~g Maxwell in 1771, said: "Mr. M'Nab is a sound and good
preacher ; but too warm, and impatient of contradiction." ^
Thomas Rutherford, one of his colleagues, writes : " I was
particularly attached to him. He was a most amiable,
sensible man, and an excellent preacher. He had the most
copious flow of natural, simple oratory, of any man I ever
heard. There was an ease, beauty, sweetness, and harmony
in his style and language, that was at once both striking and
pleasing. The Rev. Dr. Webster once said, ' I have heard
Mr. Walker, Mr. Fordyce, Dr. Blair, etc. ; but Mr. M'Nab is
a greater orator than any of them.' " ^ At the conference of
1777, M'Nab was appointed to Edinburgh ; but found the
chapel in such a ruinous condition, that he spent ^500 in re-
pairing it. For this amount he was personally responsible ;
and, in order to extricate himself, was requested, by the follow-
ing conference, to visit the English societies for the purpose
of asking assistance.'* While on this begging excursion, he
wrote a letter to Robert Dall, which is inserted here to show
the spirit of the man, and that he wished for peace, notwith-
standing that he was soon involved in war.
"Bradford, April 24, 1779.
"My very dear Brother, — I hope persons and things are better at
Glasgow then when you went there. I was grieved to hear of the dis-
union of the preachers, and that it had hurt the people ; but trust God
sent you to Glasgow as a cure for their wounds. In every place, I find
the prosperity of the work, under God, depends, in a great measure, upon
the piety, zeal, and prudence of the preachers. Persons of that character
God will honour, to build up His church ; and I need not tell you, we
have need of faith in doing and sufifering the Divine will ; for, without that,
we have not the necessary qualification to render us either holy, happy,
or useful In my present employ, I find both pleasure and pain ; but,
hitherto, God has been with me, and I believe will never leave me.
Wishing you every blessing, I am your truly affectionate brother,
"Alex. M'Nab." s
Such was one of the chief actors in the scene at Bath.
Another was the Rev. Edward Smyth, who has been already
mentioned, and who had brought his wife to Bath for the
* Methodist Magazine, 1 779, p. 240.
2 Lady Maxwell's Life, p. 70. ^ Rutherford's Life, p. 94.
^ Atmore's " Methodist Memorial." * Manuscript letter.
Disturbance at Bath. 305
benefit of her health. Wesley writes: "God having greatly 1779
blessed the labours of Mr, Smyth in the north of Ireland, I AgejG
desired him to preach every Sunday evening in our chapel,
while he remained in Bath, But, as soon as I was gone, Mr,
M'Nab vehemently opposed this ; affirming it was the com-
mon cause of all the lay preachers ; that they were appointed
by the conference, not by me ; and would not suffer the clergy
to ride over their heads, Mr. Smyth in particular, of whom
he said all manner of evil. Others warmly defended him.
Hence the society was torn in pieces, and thrown into the
utmost confusion."
Such was the dispute. What was the result .-• On No-
vember 22, Wesley and his brother set out from London to
settle the disturbance. The Bath society was assembled,
Wesley says : " I read to them a paper, which I wrote, near
twenty years ago, on a like occasion. Herein I observed,
that * the rules of our preachers were fixed by me, before any
conference existed,' particularly the twelfth : ' Above all, you
are to preach when and where I appoint,' By obstinately
opposing which rule, Mr, M'Nab has made all this uproar.
In the morning, at a meeting of the preachers, I informed
Mr. M'Nab, that, as he did not agree to our fundamental
rule, I could not receive him as one of our preachers, till he
was of another mind, Wednesday, November 24, I read the
same paper to the society at Bristol, as I found the flame had
spread thither also. A few at Bath separated from us on this
account ; but the rest were thoroughly satisfied,"
Such is the entry in Wesley's journal ; but eight months
after this, he writes: "Mr, M'Nab quarrelling with Mr. Smyth
threw wildfire among the people at Bath, and occasioned
anger, jealousies, judging each other, backbiting, and tale
bearing without end ; and, in spite of all the pains which have
been taken, the wound is not healed to this day."
Wesley throws all the blame upon M'Nab ; but it may
fairly be doubted whether this was just. There can be no
question concerning Wesley's abstract right to appoint to his
chapels whom he pleased; but the manner in which the right
was exercised is not an improper subject for doubt and discus-
sion. Wesley pleads what he did twenty years before; but,
even allowing that his action then was right, it remains to be
VOL. III. X
3o6 Life and Times of Wesley.
^779 proved, that the same action, under altered circumstances, was
Age 76 prudent now. During that interval, the number of Methodists
and Methodist preachers had more than doubled. Besides,
now that the number of itinerant preachers was more than a
hundred and sixty ; and that many of them were men of
great genius and talent, as well as piety; and that all had a
right to take part in the deliberations of the annual confer-
ence, which really made the appointments for the ensuing
year, Wesley's claim to have the sole and exclusive power,
asserted in the document read to the Bath society, is a claim
which can hardly be admitted.^ There is a forgetfulness of
existing facts, and therefore a fallaciousness, in the following
letter, written on this subject a few weeks after the Bath dis-
turbances occurred.
" January, 1 780.
" My dear Brother, — You seem not to have well considered the
Rules of a Helper, or the rise of Methodism. It pleased God, by me, to
awaken, first my brother, and then a few others ; who severally desired
of me, as a favour, that I would direct them in all things. After my return
from Georgia, many were both awakened and converted to God. One,
and another, and another of these desired to join with me as sons in the
gospel, to be directed by me. I drew up a few plain rules (observe there
was no conference in being !), and permitted them to join me on these
conditions. Whoever, therefore, violates these conditions, particularly
that of being directed by me in the work, docs, ipso facto, disjoin himself
from me. This brother M'Nab has done (but he cannot see that he has
done amiss): and he would have it a common cause ; that is, he would
have all the preachers do the same. He thinks ' they have a right so to
do.' So they have. They have a right to disjoin themselves from
me whenever they please. But they cannot, in the nature of the thing,
join with me any longer than they are directed by me. And what, if
fifty of the preachers disjoined themselves ! What should I lose thereby?
Only a great deal of labour and care, which I do not seek ; but endure,
because no one else either can or will.
" You seem likewise to have quite a wrong idea of a conference. For
above six years after my return to England, there was no such thing. I
then desired some of my preachers to meet me, in order to advise, not
control, me. And you may observe, they had no power at all, but what
^Thomas Taylor, in his manuscript diary, remarks: " 1780, January
14 — I learned, that Mr. M'Nab is excluded the connexion ; but I cannot
learn, that he has merited such treatment. A man who has been a credit
to our cause, whose moral character is unblamable, and whose abilities
are considerable, is expelled for his integrity and uprightness. Being
very uneasy on account of the expulsion, I wrote Mr. Wesley respect-
ing it."
Wesley s Right to Rule. 307
I exercised through them. I chose to exercise the power which God had ^779
given me in this manner, both to avoid ostentation, and gently to A"e~76
habituate the people to obey them when I should be taken from their
head. But as long as I remain with them, the fundamental rule of
Methodism remains inviolate. As long as any preacher joins with me,
he is to be directed by me in his work. Do not you see then, that brother
M'Nab, whatever his intentions might be, acted as wrong as wrong could
be ? and that the representing of this as the common cause of the
preachers was the way to common destruction, the way to turn their
heads, and to set them in arms ? It was a blow at the very root of
Methodism. I could not, therefore, do less than I did ; it was the very
least that could be done, for fear that evil should spread.
" I do not willingly speak of these things at all ; but I do it now out of
necessity; because I perceive the mind of you, and some others, is a little
hurt by not seeing them in a true light.
" I am, your affectionate brother,
"John Wesley." ^
This was Wesley's defence of the boldest act of discipline
he had ever exercised ; but we still doubt its wisdom and
sufficiency. All he says about the preachers placing" them-
selves under his direction, and about the first conferences, is
strictly true ; but Methodist matters now were widely difier-
ent from what they were when Methodist conferences were
first begun. With all due deference to Wesley, Methodism
now was not wholly the work of Wesley, nor was it entirely
dependent on him. At this very time, there was, among the
preachers, a ministerial phalanx, who had a right to be
something more than mere advisers, — servants in the gospel,
sometimes taken into the counsels of their chief, but wholly
at his disposal. There were Olivers, Pawson, Rankin, Murlin,
Story, Whatcoat, Valton, Benson, Hanby, Manners, Taylor,
Mather, Hopper, Vasey, Thompson, Pilmoor, Rhodes, Brad-
burn, Boardman, the two Hampsons, Barber, Rutherford,
Moore, Myles, and others, whose names will always be
memorable in Methodistic history. Considering the talents,
the preaching power, the untiring labours, and the marvellous
success of these distinguished men, was it wise, and was it
fair, for Wesley to insist upon his retention of the absolute
authority that he justly exercised when Methodism was first
commenced } Remembering the paltry pittance they received
* Wesley's Works, vol. xiii., p. 132.
3o8 Life and Times of Wesley.
1779 for their important and unceasing toil, was it just, that, in a
A^76 great religious movement, now spread throughout the three
kingdoms, and to which they themselves had greatly con-
tributed, they should be employed as mere ivorkvicn, without
the least right to take a part in the arrangement of their
respective spheres of labour, and without a particle of
authority, except what was implied in their advices, in the
general legislation of a body now numbering more than forty
thousand people ? Was it surprising, that Wesley's expulsion
of M'Nab, for claiming a pulpit to which he had been ap-
pointed at the conference, but into which Wesley desired
to introduce an expelled Irish clergyman, should create dis-
satisfaction and incipient rebellion ?
There can be no doubt, that this was one of the most
dangerous ordeals through which Methodism passed in the
lifetime of its founder. It was hardly a fair statement of the
case, when Wesley said, that all that he would lose, by fifty
of his preachers leaving him, would be " a great deal of labour
and care." If such an event had happened, Methodism would
have been split into fragments, and, as a system, would have
ceased to exist ; and Wesley, seeing the demolition of such a
work, would have been a sorrowful man for the remainder of
his life. The crisis, in 1779, was most momentous. It was
really the first time that Wesley's supreme and absolute power
.was professedly and openly resisted. The whole question
hinges on the point, were the appointments to chapels and
to circuits made by Wesley and his conference of preachers
conjointly ? or were they made by Wesley himself alone }
Wesley argues, that the power of appointment rested solely
with himself. We can only answer, that this was an unreason-
able and dangerous power to wield. Under the circumstances,
Wesley could not claim it, without ignoring the reasonable
claims of a large body of the most remarkable men that
England has ever had ; and he could not exercise it with-
out serious danger to himself and to his system.
Alexander M'Nab, though comparatively young, was not
an ordinary man. Testimonies concerning his character,
eloquence, and preaching power, have been already given.
Mr. Smyth was doubtless both sensible and pious ; but we
greatly question whether he was as popular and powerful a
Wesley s Right to Rule. 309
preacher as the North Briton. No charge of unsound doc- 17 79
trine, or of immorahty, or of incompetency, or of inattention a^^- 76
to discipline, was made against M'Nab. He was faith-
fully and successfully doing the work to which he had
been appointed. He was popular with the people. But
because he refused, at Wesley's bidding, to allow an Irish
stranger, not at all his superior, but, probably, his inferior in
pulpit ability, to take his place, Wesley, at once, by his own
ipse dixit, expelled him from his connexion of preachers.
However painful to do it, we are bound to maintain that this
was an injustice. The act might be technically right ; but it
was an almost popish assumption of autocratic authority, and
a most perilous — it might have been disastrous — exercise of
disciplinary power. It is true that no absolute rebellion
followed, — a fact showing the simple minded piety of the
Methodist preachers and people, and the marvellous influence
of Wesley over them, and their almost unparalleled respect
for his character and labours ; but there were great com-
motions and serious misgivings ; and, if concessions had not
been made, there might have been open resistance, and a
consequent wreck of Methodist success and hope.
Here, however, another question occurs. Was Wesley
to be solely or principally blamed for this imprudent exercise
of power .-* We have no wish to shield him from censure,
when censure is merited ; but if others were to blame as well
as he, or if others were even more blamable than he, it is
only fair to his memory and name, that the facts should be
published.
Charles Wesley's quarrel with the London preachers has
been already mentioned. It occurred a few months only
previous to the affair at Bath. There is no denying it, that
Charles was violently opposed to lay preachers, and was
unreasonably jealous of their intriguing to obtain co-ordinate
power with his brother, and of their intention to use such
power in effecting a separation of Methodism from the
Established Church. On Good Friday, 1779, he wrote to his
brother : "The preachers do not love the Church of England.
When we are gone, a separation is inevitable. Do you not
wish to keep as many good people in the Church as you can?
Something might be done now to save the remainder, if you
o
lo Life and Times of Wesley.
1779 had resolution, and would stand by me as firmly as I will by
Age 76 you. Consider what you are bound to do as a clergyman ;
and what you do, do quickly." ^
It was in such a frame of mind, that Charles Wesley heard
of M'Nab's resisting the authority of his brother at Bath.
Mr. Pawson, who says he was perfectly acquainted with the
affair, tells us, in his manuscript memoir of Dr. Whitehead,
that Charles Wesley "took fire at once, and highly resented
Mr. M'Nab's behaviour. He prevailed upon his brother, after
much strife and contention, to exclude Mr. M'Nab from the
connexion ; and, upon this condition, he promised to attend
him to Bath. Accordingly the two brothers, accompanied by
Dr. Coke and the Rev. Mr. Collins, went to Bath with all
possible secrecy, and the sentence was pronounced upon poor
Mr. M'Nab agreeably to Mr. Charles Wesley's wish. By this
means, the Bath society was divided. Many of the people
loved Mr. M'Nab, and thought it wrong that he should be
condemned unheard. The society at Bristol also was thrown
into great confusion ; and, had it not been for the exertions
of Dr. Coke, would have been divided like that at Bath. On
the Sunday evening after Mr. Wesley's return to London, he
brought the matter before the London society, and certainly
degraded the preachers, and laid them low even in the dust at
his feet. When he was gone from London, Mr. Charles, after
the sacrament at the new chapel, prayed for his brother in the
following words : * Lord, preserve him from his rebellious sons.
Though they curse him, do Thou bless him. Though they
wish his death, do Thou prolong his life. Lord, stand between
the living and the dead, and let not the curse of pride destroy
them.' "
This was strange language to use, in prayer, and after a
solemn sacrament ; but it was not dissimilar to the language of
a " Hymn for the Rev. John Wesley," which Charles composed,
and which was "sung by the society in Bristol, on Sunday,
December 5, 1779," only a fortnight after M'Nab's expulsion.
"Jesus, Thy hated servant own,
And send the glorious Spirit down.
In answer to our prayers ;
'Whitehead's Life of Wesley, vol. ii., p. 372.
Charles Wesley and 31' Nad. 3 1 1
While others curse, and wish him dead, 1779
Do Thou Thy choicest blessings shed,
And crown his hoary hairs." — etc., etc' '' '
Pawson was the superintendent of the London circuit, and
felt it his duty to write to Charles Wesley, and remonstrate
with him for using such language, at such a time, and in such
a place. An interview followed ; and Pawson adds : " We
came to an explanation, and he was in high good humour;
but I have reason to believe, he never forgave me. He made
his brother believe, that ]\Ir. M'Nab was only the tool of
a violent party among the preachers, among whom there was
a very powerful combination against his authority; and that, at
the next conference, they would show themselves." Pawson
adds : " There was not a single grain of truth in this. Not
one preacher in the Avhole connexion was concerned in the
business, save those who were stationed in the Bristol circuit.
It is true, that the preachers in general thought that ]\Ir.
M'Nab was cruelly used ; and so they do to this day."
Not to return to the subject, it may be added, that Dr.
Whitehead states that, as the conference of 1780 drew near,
Wesley " was evidently intimidated," and wrote to his brother
requesting him to attend the conference. Charles answered
as follows :
" My reasons against accepting your invitation to the conference are :
(i) I can do no good ; (2) I can prevent no evil ; (3) I am afraid of being
a partaker of other men's sins, or of countenancing them by my presence ;
(4) I am afraid of myself; you know I cannot command my temper, and
you have not courage to stand by me. I cannot imst your resolution;
unless you act with a vigour that is not in you, coticlamatuvi est, our affairs
are past hope.
" I am not sure, they will not prevail upon you to ordain them. You
claim the/^K/tv, and only say, ' It is not probable you shall ever exercise
it.' Probability on one side implies probability on the other; and I want
better security. So I am to stand by, and see the ruin of our cause ! You
know how far you may depend on me ; let me know how far I may
depend on you, and on our preachers. In the Bath affair, you acted with
vigour for the first time ; but you could not hold out. Unmindful of your
power and your infirmity, you yielded to the rebel, instead of his yielding
to you. You should not have employed him again till he had owned his
fault. This quite overturned my confidence in you, which I should never
' Christian Miscellany, 1849, p. 57 ; and " Wesley Poetry," vol. viii., p. 415.
o
12 Life and Times of Wesley,
Age 76
■J 779 have told you, had I not been compelled. If you think my advice can
be of any use to you, I will attend you to Bristol, and be always within
call." 1
Poor Wesley ! Wishful to repair a wrong, he had become
reconciled to Mr. M'Nab, principally by the mediation of Mr.
Pavvson and the preachers in London ;^ but, by this, he had
offended his brother, by whom he had been goaded to the
rash act at Bath.
At the conference of 1780, M'Nab was restored to his
place among his brethren, and was appointed to Sheffield.
Charles Wesley was present, and, of course, was exceedingly
dissatisfied. About a fortnight after, he wrote the following
letter to his brother.
" I did not hope, by my presence at the conference, to do any good, or
prevent any evil. So I told you in London. Yet I accepted your invita-
tion, only because you desired it. And as I came merely to please you, I
resolved not to contradict your will in anything. Your will, I perceived,
was to receive Mr. M'Nab, unhumbled, unconvinced, into your confi-
dence, and into your bosom. He came uninvited, and openly' accused
your curate for obeying your orders : you suffered it ; and did not give
Mr. M'Nab the gentlest reproof for disobeying them, and drawing others
into his rebellion ; ^nd endeavouring to engage all the preachers in it ;
making an actual separation at Bath, and still keeping up his separate
society. My judgment was, never to receive Mr. M'Nab as a preacher
//// he acknowledged his fault. But I submitted and attended in
silence. It was much easier for me to say nothing, than to speak neither
more nor less than you would approve. I was sometimes strongly tempted
to speak ; but, if I had opened my mouth, I should have spoiled all. Your
design, I believed, was to keep all quiet. I allow you your merit. * Tu
maximus ille, es units qui nobis CEDENDO restituis rem.^ By a very few
words, I could have provoked your preachers to lay aside the mask ; but
that was the very thing you guarded against; and, I suppose, the reason
for which you desired my presence was that I might be some sort of check
to the independents. Still, I think it better for the people, that they (the
preachers) should show themselves before your death than after it. You
think otherwise ; and I submit. ' Satis, jam satis spedata in te amicitia
estmeaj' and I am perfectly satisfied with my own insignificancy. I have
but one thing to do. The Lord make me ready for it !" ^
This was an angry letter of a baffled man. It was grumbling
in private what ought to have been said in public, or not to have
* Whitehead's Life of Wesley, vol. ii., p. 379.
2 Pawson's manuscript.
* Whitehead's Life of Wesley, vol. ii., p. 380.
Charles Wesley and M'Nab. 313
been said at all. The insinuation respecting the preachers 1779
was unfounded and unworthy. The desire that M' Nab should Age 76
acknowledge his fault was unjust, for M'Nab was really the
aggrieved party. Charles Wesley would have driven the
preachers into rebellion ; his brother, as ready to repair an
injury as he was anxious to avoid committing one, restored
unanimity and confidence. " There was nothing at the con-
ference," writes John Pawson, " but peace, harmony, and love."
We only add, that Mr. M'Nab's subsequent appointments
were honourable both to Wesley and himself In 1780, he
was sent to Sheffield ; in 1781 to Manchester ; and in 1782 to
Newcastle. He then retired, " and resided for several years
at Sheffield, where he was the pastor of a small congregation,
who highly esteemed him ; and there he finished his course
about the year 1797." ^
]\Ir. Smyth went back to Ireland; but, in 1782, became one
of Wesley's London curates, with a salary of sixty guineas
yearly.^ In 1786, he was appointed minister of Bethesda
chapel, Dublin ; ^ where he rent the Methodist society, and
took with him above a hundred persons, amongst whom were
the richer members of the Dublin Methodists.* He then
removed to Manchester, where he officiated as curate of St.
Clement's and St. Luke's churches. He was the author of
several publications, the chief of which were : — " The Fall
and Recovery of Man. A Poem." 1777: i2mo, 71 pages.
"James Poulson further Detected." 1778: i2mo, 58 pages.
"Twelve Sermons on the most important Subjects." '^'j']'^'-
1 2mo, 254 pages. " St. Paul against Calvin." 1809: i2mo,
115 pages. And " A Confutation of Calvinism." 1810: i2mo,
391 pages.
Much space has been occupied with the disturbances at Bath ;
but, considering the importance of the point at issue, the facts
connected with it were too important to be omitted.
The year 1779, like most previous ones, was a year of
trouble. Besides the anxiety and vexation arising out of Mr.
M'Nab's affair, Wesley was still annoyed with virulent
^ Atmore's " Methodist Memorial." ^ Manuscript
*• " Life and Times of Lady Huntingdon," vol. ii., p. 202.
■• Life of John \'alton, p. 100.
3T4 Life and Times of Wesley.
1779 attacks from his Calvinist opponents. His old friend, John
Age 76 Macgowan, pubHshed " The Foundry Budget Opened; or, the
Arcanum of Wesleyanism Disclosed." The animus of
Macgowan's pamphlet may be inferred from his motto on
the title page :
" A man so various, that lie seemed to ba
Not one, but all mankind's epitome ;
Stiff in opinions, always in the wrong ;
Was everything by starts, but nothing long."
He tells his readers, that " for craft and cunning sophistry,
he will match the Rev. Mr. John Wesley against any man
that ever stained paper with pollution " ; and throughout
speaks of him in the most contemptuous terms.
Of course, this was too savoury a production to pass un-
noticed by the Gospel Magazine. Wesley is accused, in the
review of it, with using " absurd, unscriptural jargon and
contradictions " ; and with " robbing Father, Son, and Spirit,
of their glory as a covenant God ; and exalting the sinful,
proud nature of fallen man ; and militating against the whole
tenor of Scripture, and of reformed Christianity, as professed
by all protestant churches."
Another hostile publication Avas " Methodism and Popery
dissected and compared ; and the Doctrines of both proved
to be derived from a Papal Origin." Besides attacking White-
field, Rowland Hill, and others, the anonymous author of this
scurrilous pamphlet learnedly remarks, that " it would be
less difficult to paint Proteus, in all his fabled shapes, under
one distinct figure, than to describe Wesley " ; whom he is
pleased to honour with epithets like the following : " a
living monument of apostolic frenzy"; "Jesuit"; "rank
Catholic;" "actor"; and "anabaptist."
This was far from being pleasant ; but Wesley was used to
it ; and his character was too well establfshed to need defence
from such slanderous attacks. It may be doubted whether he
took the trouble to read a tithe of the malignant diatribes
launched against him.
While on the subject of books, it is due to Methodism to
notice an interesting fact not generally known. The first
Bible society, founded in Great Britain, and perhaps in the
" Naval and Military Bible Society. " 315
world, was established in 1779, "^^^ '^^'^s the work of Method- 17 79
ists. George Cussons and John Davies, after leaving the Age 76
leaders' meeting in West Street chapel, entered into con-
versation, and, when near Soho Square, formed a resolution
to endeavour to raise a fund for supplying soldiers with pocket
Bibles. They and a dozen of their friends united themselves
into a society for promoting this object. Their meetings were
held once a month in the house of Mr. Dobson, of Oxford
Street. John Thornton, Esq., of Clapham, became a generous
subscriber. The first parcel of Bibles was sent from the
vestry of Wesley's West Street chapel ; and the first sermon
on behalf of the society was preached in the same chapel, by
the Rev. Mr. Collins, from the appropriate words, " And the
Philistines were afraid, for they said, God is come into the
camp. And they said. Woe unto us ! for there hath not been
such a thing heretofore."^ Thus arose "The Naval and
Military Bible Society," — twenty-five years before the forma-
tion of "The British and Foreign Bible Society" in 1804, —
a society still in active operation, and we believe the oldest
association for the circulation of the word of God, that now
exists.
Wesley still employed the press, as well as pulpit, in de-
fending and spreading truth. John Atlay was his book
steward, of whose conscientiousness he had a high opinion.
Hence the following unpublished letter, sent to Bradburn.
"Edinburgh, June 19, 1779.
" Dear Sammy, — I suppose John Atlay has paid the money. He is
cautious to an extreme. I hear what angry men say or write ; but I do
not often regard it. Lemonade will cure any disorder of the bowels,
(whether it be with or without purging,) in a day or two. You do well to
spread the prayer-meetings up and down. They seldom are in vain.
Honest Andrew Dunlop^ writes me word that the book money is stolen.
Pray desire him to take care that the knave does not steal his teeth.
"I am, dear Sammy, your affectionate friend and brother,
"John Wesley."
Wesley published, in 1779, the seventeenth extract from
his journal, extending from September 13, 1773, to January 2,
1776; i2mo, 82 pages.
'^ Methodist Magazine, 1823, p. 737.
* The assistant of the Limerick circuit.
3i6 Life and Thnes of Wesley.
^119 Popery was beginning to be troublesome; for parliament,
Age 76 in the previous year, had passed a bill removing from the
English and Irish papists the penalties and disabilities
imposed upon them by the famous act, " for the further pre-
venting the growth of popery," enacted in 1699. Wesley had
been called a papist times without number ; but now, in a
time of danger, he proved himself one of popery's most
trenchant opponents. His pamphlet, now issued, with the title,
" Popery Calmly Considered," i2mo, 25 pages, was one of the
most timely and valuable productions of his pen. Scores of
such pamphlets have been given to the public ; but not one
superior to Wesley's. He writes: "In the following tract, I
propose, first, to lay down and examine the chief doctrines of
the Church of Rome: secondly, to show the natural tendency of
a few of those doctrines ; and that with all the plainness and
all the calmness I can." " Mr. J. Russell," observes Charles
Wesley, in a letter dated April 23, 1779, "tells me, some of
the bitterest Calvinists are reconciled to you for the tract on
popery. It should be spread immediately through the three
kingdoms." ^ We shall meet with popery again ; but, mean-
time, we wish the Methodist book committee and conference
would do, at present, what Charles Wesley wished to be done
ninety years ago. However urgent the case was in 1779, the
necessity now is ninety times greater than it was then ; and
John Wesley's successors will be recreant to his protestant
principles unless they do their duty as he did his.
It only remains, before concluding the present chapter, to
notice Wesley's Armiiiian JSlagazine. This, like the volume
for 1778, was, to a large extent, controversial, Wesley believing
that " there never was more need, in the memory of man, of
opposing the Horrible Decree, than at this day; for thousands,
in every part of England, were still halting between two
opinions, and were exceedingly perplexed on this account."
Among other pieces, intended to refute the Calvinian theory,
he republished his own " Predestination Calmly Considered,"
which he first printed in 1752. There are interesting lives of
Bishop Bedell, Archbishop Usher, and Dr. Donne, the last
mentioned by Wesley's own pen, though never included in his
^ Methodist Magazine, 1789, p. 387.
Wesley s Piiblications hi 1779. 317
collected works. There are short accounts of ten of his 17 79
itinerant preachers, accompanied by their respective por- Age 76
traits, many of which he pronounces "really striking."
There are ninety-three letters, most of which, says he,
"are closely practical and experimental." There are about
seventy poetical pieces, one of which, " Henry and Emma,
a Dialogue,^' fills more than fourteen pages ; a sort of
love story, to which objections were not unreasonably raised.
Wesley acknowledged that it was "not strictly religious";
but maintains that there was "nothing in it contrary to
religion, nothing that can offend the chastest ears " ; that it
was " one of the finest poems in the English tongue, both for
sentiment and language " ; and that those who could " read it
without tears must have a stupid and unfeeling heart." All
this might be true ; but, with all due deference to Wesley,
there can hardly be two opinions, that it was out of its proper
place when inserted in the Arjniuian ]\Tagazine.
1 780.
1780 'npHE year 1780 will always be marked in English
A^77 X history. The nation was steeped in guilt and misery.
War was raging on almost every side. Trade was paralysed ;
and taxes intolerable. Popery had been established in
Canada; and, by the repealing of the statutes of the nth
and 1 2th of King William III., had received great encourage-
ment in England. The Protestant Association sprung into
existence ; and the Gordon riots followed. The details of these
events are full of profound interest and instruction ; but our
limited space prevents 'enlargement. Suffice it to say, that,
in this serious crisis, Wesley took an active interest. He
writes: "1780. January 18 — Receiving more and more
accounts of the increase of popery, I believed it my duty to
write a letter concerning it, which was afterwards inserted in
the public papers. Many were grievously offended; but I
cannot help it ; I must follow my own conscience."
The following was Wesley's unanswerable, though ob-
noxious letter,
" A Letter to the Printer of the Public Advertiser, occasioned by the
late Act, passed in favour of Popery.
"City Road, January 21, 1780.
"Sir, — Some time ago, a pamphlet was sent me, entitled 'An Appeal
from the Protestant Association to the People of Great Britain.' A day
or two since, a kind of answer to this was put into my hands, which
pronounces ' its style contemptible, its reasoning futile, and its object
malicious.' On the contrary, I think the style of it is clear, easy, and
natural ; the reasoning, in general, strong and conclusive ; the object,
or design, kind and benevolent. And in pursuance of the same kind
and benevolent design, namely, to preserve our happy constitution, 1
shall endeavour to confirm the substance of that tract by a few plain
arguments.
" With persecution I have nothing to do. I persecute no man for his
religious principles. Let there be as ' boundless a freedom in reli-
gion,' as any man can conceive. But this does not touch the point ; I
will set religion, true or false, utterly out of the question. Suppose the
Bible, if you please, to be a fable, and the Koran to be the word of
God. I consider not, whether the Romish religion be true or false ; I
Wesley's Letters on Popery. 319
build nothing on one or the other supposition. Therefore, away with all 1780
your commonplace declamation about intolerance and persecution in pj^-j-j
religion ! Suppose every word of Pope Pius's creed to be true ; suppose
the council of Trent to have been infallible : yet, I insist upon it, that no
government, not Roman Catholic, ought to tolerate men of the Roman
Catholic persuasion,
" I prove this by a plain argument ; let him answer it that can. That
no Roman CathoHc does or can give security for his allegiance or peace-
able behaviour, I prove thus. It is a Roman Catholic maxim, estabhshed,
not by private men, but by a public council, that 'no faith is to be kept
■with heretics.' This has been openly avowed by the council of Constance ;
but it never was openly disclaimed. Whether private persons avow or
disavow it, it is a fixed maxim of the Church of Rome. But as lon<j as it
is so, it is plain that the members of that church can give no reasonable
security, to any government, of their allegiance or peaceable behaviour.
Therefore, they ought not to be tolerated by any government, protestant,
Mahommedan, or pagan.
" You may say, ' Nay, but they will take an oath of allegiance.' True,
five hundred oaths ; but the maxim, ' no faith is to be kept with heretics,'
sweeps them all away as a spider's web. So that still, no governors that
are not Roman Catholics can have any security of their allegiance.
" Again, those who acknowledge the spiritual power of the pope can
give no security of their allegiance to any government ; but all Roman
Catholics acknowledge this ; therefore, they can give no security for their
allegiance.
" The power of granting pardons for all sins, past, present, and to
come, is, and has been, for many centuries, one branch of his spiritual
power.
"But those who acknowledge him to have this spiritual power can give
no security for their allegiance ; since they believe the pope can pardon
rebellions, high treasons, and all other sins whatsoever.
" The power of dispensing with any promise, oath, or vow, is another
branch of the spiritual power of the pope. And all who acknowledge
his spiritual power must acknowledge this. But whoever acknowledges
the dispensing power of the pope can give no security for his allegiance to
any government Oaths and promises are none ; they are light as air j
a dispensation makes them all null and void.
" Nay, not only the pope, but even 2i priest has power to pardon sins !
This is an essential doctrine of the Church of Rome. But they that
acknowledge this cannot possibly give any security for their allegiance to
any government. Oaths are no security at all ; for the priest can pardon
both perjury and high treason.
" Setting then religion aside, it is plain that, upon principles of reason,
no government ought to tolerate men, who cannot give any security to
that government for their allegiance and peaceable behaviour. But this
no Romanist can do, not only while he holds that 'no faith is to be kept
with heretics,' but so long as he acknowledges either priestly absolution
or the spiritual power of the pope.
Life and Times of Wesley.
1780 '"But the late act,' you say, 'does not either tolerate or encourage
Roman Catholics.' I appeal to matter of fact. Do not the Romanists
S^ 77 themselves understand it as a toleration ? You know they do. And does
it not already (let alone what it may do by-and-by) encourage them to
preach openly, to build chapels (at Bath and elsewhere), to raise semi-
naries, and to make numerous converts day by day, to their intolerant,
persecuting principles .'' I can point out, if need be, several of the persons.
And they are increasing daily.
" But ' nothing dangerous to English liberty is to be apprehended from
them.' I am not certain of that. Some time since, a Romish priest
came to one I knew ; and, after talking with her largely, broke out,
'You are no heretic ! You have the experience of a real Christian !'
'And would you,' she asked, 'burn me alive?' He said, 'God forbid !
unless it were for the good of the church !'
" Now what securit)^ could she have had for her life, if it had depended
on that man? The good of the church would have burst all the ties of
truth, justice, and mercy. Especially when seconded by the absolution of
a priest, or^ if need were, a papal pardon.
" If any please to answer this, and to set his name, I shall probably
reply ; but the productions of anonymous writers I do not promise to
take any notice of.
" I am, sir, your humble servant,
"John Wesley."
Wesley's arguments are irrefutable ; and terrible is Eng-
land's danger, at the present day, because such arguments,
instead of being answered, have been dexterously, but disas-
trously, ignored by England's statesmen. Wesley's letter
will probably be treated, by many, as they would treat an
old almanack, out of date; but, on February 17, 1780, it
evoked the unanimous thanks of the Protestant Association ;
and, in the same month, was published in the pages of
Wesley's bitterest antagonist, — the Gospel Magazine, — with
an editorial note, that it had " been almost universally
approved of," and that it was a " production of real
merit."
Wesley's letter was too damaging to the disloyalty and
preposterous assumptions of popery, to pass unnoticed. His
chief antagonist was the Rev. Arthur O'Leary, the son of
peasant parents, and now a popish priest, in the fiftieth year
of his age.
O'Leary's remarks on Wesley's letter made an octavo
pamphlet of loi pages. The friar tells the Methodist, that
the temperature of Ireland's climate and the quality of its
Father O'Leary. 321
soil had cleansed the veins of its papists "from the sour 1780
and acid blood of the Scythians and Saxons." He writes : Age~77
" We are tender hearted, we are good natured, we have feeUngs. We
shed tears on the urns of the dead; deplore the loss of hecatombs of
victims slaughtered on the gloomy altars of religious bigotry ; cry in
seeing the ruins of cities over which fanaticism has displayed the funeral
torch ; and sincerely pity the blind zeal of our Scotch and English neigh-
bours, whose constant character is to pity none, for erecting the banners
of persecution, at a time when the inquisition is abolished in Spain and
Milan, and the protestant gentry are caressed at Rome, and live unmo-
lested in the luxuriant plains of France and Italy, We are too wise to
quarrel about religion. The Roman Catholics sing their psalms in
Latin, with a few inflections of the voice. Our protestant neighbours
sing the same psalms in English, on a larger scale of musical notes. We
never quarrel with our honest and worthy neighbours, the quakers, for not
singing at all ; nor shall we ever quarrel with Mr. Wesley for raising his
voice to heaven, and warbling forth his canticles on whatever tune he
pleases. We like social harinony; and, in civil music, hate discordance.
Thus, when we go to the shambles, we never inquire into the butcher's
religion, but into the quality of his meat. We care not whether the ox
was fed in the pope's territories, or on the mountains of Scotland ; pro-
vided the joint be good ; for, though there be many heresies in old books,
we discover neither heresy rvQx superstition in beef and claret. We divide
them cheerfully with one another ; and, though of different religions, we
sit over the bowl with as much cordiality as if we were at a lovcfeast."
O'Leary's quaint jocularity and rounded periods are
amusing ; but they furnish not the slightest answer to
Wesley's allegations. On March 23, Wesley replied to
O'Leary, in a letter addressed to the editors of the Freeman s
Journal, and from which the following is extracted.
"Mr. O'Leary's remarks are no more an answer to my letter, than to
the Bull Unigenitns. His manner of writing is easy and pleasant ; but
might it not as well be more serious ? The subject we are treating of is
not a light one ; it moves me to tears, rather than to laughter. I plead
for the safety of my country ; yea, for the children that are yet unborn.
I would not have the Roman Catholics persecuted at all. I would only
have them hindered from doing hurt : I would not put it in their power to
cut the throats of their quiet neighbours." ^
O'Leary published a " Rejoinder to Mr. Wesley's Reply," in
which he was less jocular, but not more logical. Of Wesley's
three reasons why it is not safe to tolerate papists, two were
^ Methodist Magazine, 1781, p. 295.
VOL. III. Y
32 2 J^if^ (ind Tmics of Wesley.
1780 left untouched, and one was played with and evaded. Such
K^-j-j 3. controversialist scarcely deserved an answer ; and, yet,
Wesley supplemented his second letter by a third, dated
Chester, March 31, 1780. After recapitulating his three
reasons, Wesley writes :
"Nine parts in ten of Mr. O'Leary's remarks are quite wide of the
mark. Not that they are wide of his mark, which is to introduce a
plausible panegyric upon the Roman Catholics, mixed with keen invec-
tives against the protestants, whether true or false it matters not. All
this is admirably well calculated to inspire the reader with aversion to
these heretics, and to bring them back to the holy, harmless, much
injured Church of Rome ! Close arguing he does not attempt ; but he
vapours, and skips to and fro, and rambles to all points of the compass, in
a very lively and entertaining manner."
Wesley thus concludes his long letter :
" What security for my life can any man give me, till he utterly
renounces the council of Constance ? What security can any Romanist
give a protestant, till this doctrine is publicly abjured? If Mr. O'Leary
has anything more to plead for this council, I shall follow him step by
step. But let him keep his word, and 'give a serious answer to a serious
charge.' 'Drollery may come in when we are talking of roasting fowls';
but not when we talk of ' roasting men.'
" Would I then wish the Roman Catholics to be persecuted ? I never
said or hinted any such thing. I abhor the thought : it is foreign to all
I have preached and wrote for these fifty years. But I would wish the
Romanists in England (I had no others in view) to be treated still with
the same lenity that they have been these sixty years ; to be allowed
both civil and religious liberty, but not permitted to undermine ours. I
wish them to stand just as they did before the late act was passed : not
to be persecuted or hurt themselves ; but gently restrained from hurting
their neighbours.
" I am, gentlemen, your obedient servant,
"John Wesley."^
Here the controversy ended.^ O'Leary was baffled ; and,
1 Methodist Magazine, 1 781, p. 352.
2 As a specimen of popish Jesuitry, it may be added, that O'Leary's
Remarks upon Wesley's Letter were first printed in six successive numbers
of the F?-eenian^s yonrnal; but were afterwards reprinted in London with
the following title, " Mr. O'Leary's Remarks on the Rev. Mr. Wesley's
Letter in Defence of the Protestant Associations in England, to which
are prefixed Mr. Wesley's Letters." This was a popish deception,
intended, no doubt, to cast upon Wesley the odium incurred by the Pro-
testant Association during the Gordon riots. The truth is: (i) Wesley
had not written more than a few lines in defence of the appeal of that
Wesley visits Loj^d George Gordon. 323
to this day, the arguments in Wesley's letter of January 21, 1780
1780, remain unanswered. Seven years afterwards, when at Age 77
Cork, Wesley wrote : " A gentleman invited me to breakfast,
with my old antagonist. Father O'Leary. I was not at all
displeased at being disappointed. He is not the stiff, queer
man that I expected ; but of an easy, genteel carriage, and
seems not to be wanting either in sense or learning."
It was during this controversy, and while Wesley was in the
north of Ireland, that the fearful riots occurred, which are so un-
fortunately associated with the name of Lord George Gordon,
and which were the cause of that nobleman's incarceration
(rightly or wrongly) in the Tower of London. Here Wesley,
after repeated invitations, visited him, and writes: "1780,
December 19 — I spent an hour with Lord George Gordon, at
his apartment in the Tower. Our conversation turned upon
popery and religion. He seemed to be well acquainted with
the Bible; and had abundance of other books, enough to
furnish a study. I was agreeably surprised to find he did not
complain of any person or thing ; and cannot but hope his
confinement will take a right turn, and prove a lasting blessing
to him."
We return to more congenial matters. Wesley spent the
first two months of 1780 in London and its vicinity. On
February 28, he started on his journey to the north. Among
other places, he now, for the first time, preached at Delph. He
writes: "April 7 — I went to Delph, a little village upon the
mountains, where a remarkable work of God is just broke out.
I was just set down, when the minister sent me word, I was
"welcome to preach in his church. On hearing this, many
people walked thither immediately, near a mile from the
town ; but, in ten minutes, he sent me word his mind was
changed. We knew not then what to do, till the trustees of
the independent meeting offered us the use of their house.
It was quickly filled, and truly God bore witness to His
word."
Association. (2) His two replies to O'Leary, published in the Freeman's
yournal, were suppressed in O'Leary's pamphlet. (3) A spurious letter
was inserted, and palmed on the public as genuine, which Wesley
declared was not his, and one which he had never seen before O'Leary
printed it. — {Methodist Magazine, 1781, p. 295.)
324 Life and Times of Wesley.
The minister of the parish church was the Rev. Mr. Hegin-
botham, who had engaged Mr. Stones as his curate. Mr.
Stones was a sportsman, fond of his dog and gun. On one
occasion, a rough Yorkshireman told him, it would be better if
he minded his study more and his gun less. The curate took
the hint ; his dogs and his guns were given up ; he became a
thorough Christian ; his ministry was greatly blessed ; an
extensive religious awakening followed ; meetings for prayer
were convened in private houses ; and not a few were
scripturally converted. Opposition soon ensued, on the ground
that the poor, by spending so much time in prayer, would
neglect their Avork, and become chargeable to the parish.
The curate was dismissed ; the young converts applied to
Joseph Benson, then at Manchester, for help ; Methodist
preaching was commenced ; a room in Millgate hired ; and
a flourishing society was formed.^ The case was named to
Wesley; and, a fortnight before his visit, he signed the follow-
ing legal looking document, which to a Methodist antiquarian
will be welcome.
" Whereas for about twelve months last past, the people called
Methodists have preached in a room at Delph, in Saddleworth, in the
county of York, — the travelling preachers coming there regularly every
fortnight from Manchester, besides local preachers occasionally on
Sundays. And Whereas the last summer such crowds attended, that the
room could not contain them, the society also increasing very fast, and a
great likelihood of much good being done in the place, — It is, therefore,
thought necessary that a preaching house be erected at Delph aforesaid,
twelve yards long and eight wide. The expense of such a building,
according to the plan laid down, will be vastly more than the society will be
able to raise amongst themselves. They have, therefore, requested our
consent to go amongst our societies, to ask the charitable contributions of
such of our friends as would willingly encourage such an undertaking.
This is, therefore, to certify that we approve of the measure, and recom-
mend the same to our Christian friends everywhere, hoping they will
readily and cheerfully contribute to the same.
" Manchester, March 25, 1780. " John Wesley." 2
This formalised certificate smacks of the office of Joseph
Mellor, the Methodist attorney of the town of Delph ; and
Wesley must have been hard pressed for time when, instead
of writing a statement of the case himself, he put his hand to
^ Methodist Magazine, 1853, p. 785. ^ Manuscript.
Wesley asks a Favour. 325
such legal magniloquence. Sufifice it to add, the chapel was ^7^0
built, with not more than ;^ioo of debt resting upon the Age 77
premises.^
It was during this northern tour, that Wesley, for the first
time, was denied the use of the church at Haworth. He
writes : " Sunday, April 23 — Mr. Richardson being unwilling
that I should preach any more in Haworth church, Providence
opened another ; I preached in Bingley church, both morning
and afternoon. This is considerably larger than the other."
It was either on this, or some future occasion, when
Wesley was preaching in Bingley church, that a rich man in
the congregation, who seemed to think that his wealth was a
licence to practise bad manners, sneered at the preacher and
at his sentiments. Wesley paused, and fixing his keen eye
on the Dives sitting in the seat of the scornful, said : " I heed
your sneers no more than I heed the fluttering of a butterfly ;
but I know what good breeding is as well as any gentleman
in the land."
It was now that Wesley preached his first sermon in Black-
burn. He writes : " April 27 — I preached in Todmorden
church with great enlargement of heart. In the afternoon we
went on to Blackburn. It seemed the whole town was
moved ; and the question was where to put the congregation.
We could not stand abroad because of the sun ; so as many
as could squeezed into the preaching house. All the chief
men of the town were there." Mr. Banning was W^esley's
host at Blackburn ; and, on one occasion, took his venerable
guest to see a neighbouring chapel which was in the course of
being built. " Mr. Banning," said Wesley, " I have a favour
to ask. Let there be no pews in the body of this chapel,
except one for the leading singers. Be sure to make accom-
modation for the poor. TJicy are God's building materials in
the erecting of His church. The rich make good scaffolding,
but bad materials^ ^ Weighty words ! One of Methodism's
evil omens, at the present day, is a disregard of the advice
which Wesley gave, namely, that, in building chapels, the
Methodists should never fail to provide ample accommodation
for the poor.
' Methodist Magazine, 1853, p. 786.
^ Eanning's Memoirs (private circulation).
326 Life and Times of Wesley.
1780 It was a sign of Wesley's growing popularity, that, though,
^~^» forty years before, he had been indignantly expelled from the
pulpits of the Established Church, he was now invited, in all
parts of the country, by rectors, vicars, curates, and others, to
favour them with his services. At Pateley Bridge, in 1752,
Thomas Lee, the old itinerant, and his Methodist companions,
were subjected to treatment the most barbarous ; and, on
applying to the Dean of Ripon for protection, were met with
a churchman's scorn rather than a magistrate's just dealing.
Now it was otherwise. Wesley writes : " 1780, May I — At
Pateley Bridge, the vicar offered me the use of his church.
Though it was more than twice as large as our preaching
house, it was not near large enough to contain the congrega-
tion. How vast is the increase of the work of God ! particu-
larly in the most rugged and uncultivated places. How does
He ' send the springs ' of grace also ' into the valleys, that
run among the hills!'"
Leaving Pateley, Wesley, for the first time, visited Ripon.
He writes : " May 2 — We came to Ripon, and observed a
remarkable turn of providence : the great hindrance of the
work of God in this place has suddenly disappeared ; and the
poor people, being delivered from their fear, gladly flock
together, and hear His word. The new preaching house was
quickly more than filled."
Four years previous to this, Thomas Dixon was one
of the Ripon jDreachers, and, in his unpublished auto-
biography, wrote : " Upon our going to Ripon, we preached
in a small room up a flight of stairs, and even this we
were to leave at Martinmas. But, just at this time, Mr. T.
Dowson, who had suffered much for the gospel's sake, bought
the premises where an old barn and stable stood. He
immediately pulled down the barn, and built a decent
chapel and a dwelling house upon the site, and, with such
expedition, that we were able to get into the shell of the new
chapel by the time we had to leave the upstairs room. By
this means, God gave the poor persecuted Methodists, in
Ripon, a degree of rest they had never known before, and the
work, from that time, gradually grew."
On leaving Ripon, Wesley proceeded " through a delightful
country to the immense ruins of Garvaix Abbey," and thence
Methodism at Newark, etc. 327
across the " horrid, dreary, enormous mountains " to Penrith, 1780
another place where he now, for the first time, preached. He Age"?/
writes : "INIay 5 — In the evening, a large room, designed for an
assembly, was procured for me at Penrith ; but several of the
poor people were struck with panic, for fear the room should
fall. Finding there was no remedy, I went down into the
court below, and preached in great peace to a multitude of
well behaved people."
On May ii, Wesley reached Newcastle, and thence pro-
ceeded to Scotland. On his return southwards, we find him
preaching at Durham, Darlington, Northallerton, Borough-
bridge, and York. Making his way through Lincolnshire, he
came to Newark, where, twenty years before, the mob had
burnt the Methodist pulpit in the market place ; and had not
only pelted the preacher, Thomas Lee, with all sorts of mis-
siles, and dragged him to the river Trent, where they ducked
and dabbled him without mercy, but, to complete the whole, a
painter came with his pot and brush, and bedaubed him most
ludicrously. Wesley writes : " 1780, June 12 — Our friends at
Newark were divided as to the place where I should preach.
At length, they found a convenient place, covered on three
sides, and on the fourth open to the street. It contained two
or three thousand people well, who appeared to hear as for
life. Only one big man, exceeding drunk, was very noisy
and turbulent, till his wife {fortissinia Tyndaridarinn !) seized
him by the collar, gave hhn two or three hearty boxes on the
ear, and dragged him away like a calf But, at length, he got
out of her hands, crept in among the people, and stood as
quiet as a lamb."
On June 13, Wesley wrote: "I accepted of an invitation
from a gentleman at Lincoln, in which I had not set my foot
for upwards of fifty years. At six in the evening, I preached
in the castle yard to a large and attentive congregation.
They were all as quiet as if I had been at Bristol. Will God
have a people here also 1 " For seven years after this, there
was not a Methodist in Lincoln.
After an interval of many years, Wesley preached again at
Boston, where, in 1757, Alexander Mather, the first Methodist
preacher there, had his face plastered with mire taken from
the kennels of the streets, and his head laid open with a stone.
-'28 Life and Times of Wesley.
o
1780 Wesley spent his birthday in Sheffield, and wrote :
£^,jj "June 28 — I can hardly think I am entered this day into the
seventy-eighth year of my age. By the blessing of God, I
am just the same as when I entered the twenty-eighth. This
hath God wrought, chiefly by my constant exercise, my rising
early, and preaching morning and evening."
The next day, he preached his first and last sermon at
Worksop. He says : "I was desired to preach at Worksop;
but when I came, they had not fixed on any place. At length,
they chose a lamentable one, full of dirt and dust, but without
the least shelter from the scorching sun. This few could bear;
so we had only a small company of as stupid people as I
ever saw."
After this, Wesley made his way to London, where he spent
a week ; and, then, he and his brother set out for Bristol, for
the purpose of holding his annual conference. He writes :
" August I — Our conference began. We have been always,
hitherto, straitened for time. It was now resolved, ' For the
future, we will allow nine or ten days for each conference ;
that everything, relative to the carrying on of the work of
God, may be maturely considered.' "
The conference, in this instance, lasted from August i to
August 9, inclusive. Its main business was a revision of the
minutes of conferences already held. Several alterations
were made, some of the chief being the following. It was no
longer to be a rule, that Methodists were to endeavour to
preach most where Wesley and his brother clergymen were
allowed to preach in parish churches. Classmeetings were
to be made more lively and profitable, by removing improper
leaders ; and care was to be taken, that those appointed were
not only men of sound judgment, but truly pious. If a
preacher could secure twenty hearers at five o'clock in the
morning, he was to preach ; if not so many, he was to sing
and pray. " Observe," says Wesley to his preachers, " it is
not your business to preach so many times, and to take care of
this or that society ; but to save as many souls as you can, to
bring as many sinners as you possibly can to repentance, and,
with all your power, to build them up in that holiness without
which they cannot see the Lord. And remember ! a Method-
ist preacher is to mind every point, great and small, in the
Conference of i^Zo. 329
Methodist discipline! Therefore, you will need all the sense 1780
you have, and to have all your wits about you." It was pj^nn
agreed, that the neglect of fasting was sufficient to account
for their feebleness and faintness of spirit. They were con-
tinually grieving the Holy Spirit of God, by the habitual
neglect of a plain duty. " Let j^ou and I," says Wesley,
" every Friday (beginning on the next), avow this duty
throughout the nation, by touching no tea, coffee, or chocolate,
in the morning, but, (if we want it,) half-a-pint of milk or
water gruel. Let us dine on potatoes, and, (if we need it,)
eat three or four ounces of flesh in the evening. At other
times, let us eat no flesh suppers. These exceedingly tend to
breed nervous disorders." The rule was rescinded, that no
preacher ought to print anything Avithout Wesley's approba-
tion. The preachers were to join as one man in putting an
end to the indecency of the people talking in the preaching
houses, before and after service. Complaints having been
made, that sluts had spoiled preachers' houses, W^esley writes:
" Let none, that has spoiled one, ever live in another. But
what a shame is this ! A preacher's wife should be a pattern
of cleanliness, in her person, clothes, and habitation. Let
nothing slatternly be seen about her ; no rags, no dirt, no
litter. And she should be a pattern of industry ; always at
work, either for herself, her husband, or the poor. I am not
willing that any should live in the Orphan House at Newcastle,
or any preaching house, who does not conform to this rule."
Complaints were also made, that people crowded into the
preachers' houses as into coffee shops, without invitation ;
and it was ruled, that no person should, in future, come into a
preacher's house, unless he wanted to ask a question.
Some of these may appear to be minute matters ; but they
are not without interest as indicative of the defects of Method-
ists in the days of Wesley.
There is reason to believe, though the fact is not
recorded in the minutes, that the Church question was again
discussed at the conference of 1780. Hence the following
letter, written to Miss Bosanquet.
"Bristol, August 5, 1780.
"My dear Sister, — I snatch time from the conference to write two
or three lines. I am glad you have begun a prayer-meeting at Hunslet,
330
Life and Twies of Wesley.
1780
Age 77
and doubt not it will be productive of much good. Hitherto, we have had
a blessed conference. The case of the Church we shall fully consider
by-and-by ; and, I believe, we shall agree that none who leave the Church
shall remain with us.
" I am, my dear sister, yours most affectionately,
"John Wesley." ^
Charles Wesley was present, and was far from satisfied.
He purposed to attend no more of these annual synods, and
wrote as follows :
*' Why should I longer. Lord, contend,
My last important moments spend
In buffeting the air ?
In warning those who will not see,
But rest in blind security,
And rush into the snare .''
Prophet of ills, why should I live,
Or, by my sad forebodings, grieve
Whom I can serve no more ?
I only can their loss bewail.
Till life's exhausted sorrows fail,
And the last pang is o'er." ^
Poor Charles, alarmed lest the Methodists should leave the
Church, retired from the conference to weep and die ; John to
rejoice and work.
Conference statistics have not been given annually ; but the
following figures will show the progress made during the
decade of years ending at the conference of 1780,
Circuits.
Itinerant
Preachers.
Members.
Kingswood
Collection.
1770
1780
50
64
123
171
29,406
43,830
/218 4 5
^^402 I 9
Increase . .
14
48
14,424
^183 17 4
To these numbers, however, must be added the Methodists
in the West Indies, and also 20 circuity, 42 itinerant preachers,
and 8504 members of society in America.^
^ Wesley's Works, vol. xii.,p. 379.
2 Jackson's Life of C. Wesley, vol. ii., p. 327.
s Minutes of Methodist Conferences in America.
Mcf/iodisvt in America. 331
The American conference met at Baltimore on April 24, 1780
and agreed to continue in close communion with the Church, Age~77
and to permit "the friendly clergy" to preach and administer
the sacraments in Methodist chapels. Hitherto, neither
Asbury, nor any other of the preachers in America, had ad-
ministered these Christian ordinances to the Methodist people;
and, as the number of members was now rapidly increasing,
this was becoming a momentous question. The want in
England had been met, to some extent, by Wesley and his
brother and their clerical assistants ; but, in America, the
Methodists had no ordained clergyman to render service like
this. Besides, there the Methodists were very differently situated
from what Methodists were in England. In this country, wher-
ever there was a Methodist society there was a parish church,
at which, if they chose, Methodists might attend on sacra-
mental occasions. In America it was otherwise. Clergymen
were few ; and parish churches far distant from each other ;
and, in many instances, where Methodist societies had been
formed, no church existed. The case Avas becoming serious.
Were these thousands of American Methodists to be left with-
out sacraments } Or were unordained Methodist preachers
to administer sacraments .'' Or was an effort to be made,
to send a clergyman of the Church of England to supply
this lack of sacred service .-' Or was Wesley himself to
assume episcopal functions, and, by ordination, turn his
preachers into priests .'' These were serious difficulties to be
surmounted. To deprive eight thousand converted people of
the most sacred ordinances of the church, would have been a
sin against the church's Head. To allow unordained preachers
to administer baptism and the Lord's supper was a thing for
which Wesley himself was not prepared ; though who can
question, that a man like Francis Asbury, whom God had so
signally honoured, had as much right to do this as the most
renowned priest or prelate in existence .'' An alternative re-
mained, namely, either to send the American Methodists an
ordained clergyman of the Church of England ; or that
Wesley should take upon himself the office of ordainer, and
thus qualify his own itinerants for what was conceived to be a
higher function than that of preaching the infinitely great and
everlasting truths of Christ's glorious gospel.
332 Life and Times of Wesley.
1780 Was Wesley prepared for such a step as this ? Fortunately,
^~y- this is a point on which we are not left to speculate. In a
letter to his brother, dated June 8, 1780, he writes : "Read
Bishop Stillingfleet's ' Irenicon,' or any impartial history of
the ancient church, and I believe you will think as I do. I
verily believe, I have as good a right to ordain, as to admi-
nister the Lord's supper. But I see abundance of reasons why
I should not use that right, unless I was turned out of the
Church. At present, we are just in our place." ^
As yet, Wesley, for "abundance of reasons," hesitated to
ordain his preachers; and, hence, the only remaining expe-
dient was to endeavour to secure an ordained clergyman of
the Church of England ; and this he attempted. The fol-
lowing letter was addressed to Dr. Lowth, bishop of London,
two months after the date of his letter to his brother Charles.
The reader will perceive, that it was written the day after the
close of the Bristol conference. It ought to be premised
that, previous to this, Wesley had applied to the bishop for a
clerical helper, and had met with a refusal.
" Aits^itst 10, 1780.
** My Lord, — Some time since, I received your lordship's favour, for
which I return your lordship my sincere thanks. These persons did not
apply to the Society," [for Propagating Christian Knowledge in Foreign
Parts,] " because they had nothing to ask of them. They wanted no salary
for their minister: they were themselves able and willing to maintain him.
They, therefore, applied, by me, to your lordship, as members of the
Church of England, and desirous so to continue, begging the favour of
your lordship, after your lordship had examined him, to ordain a pious
man who might officiate as their minister.
" But your lordship observes, 'There are three ministers in that country
already.' True, my lord : but what are three, to watch over all the souls
in that extensive country ? Will your lordship permit me to speak freely ?
I dare not do otherwise. I am on the verge of the grave, and know not
the hour when I shall drop into it. Suppose there were threescore of
those missionaries in the country, could I in conscience recommend these
souls to their care ? Do they take any care of their own souls } If they
do, (I speak it with concern,) I fear they are almost the only missionaries
in America that do. My lord, I do not speak rashly : I have been in
America; and so have several with whom I have lately conversed. And
both I and they know, what manner of men the greater part of these are.
^ Wesley's Works, vol. xii., p. 137.
Letter to Bishop Lowth. 333
They are men who have neither the power of rehgion, nor the form; men 1780
that lay no claim to piety, nor even decency.
" Give me leave, my lord, to speak more freely still : perhaps it is the ^^ ' '
last time I shall trouble your lordship. I know your lordship's abilities
and extensive learning : I believe, what is far more, that your lordship
fears God. I have heard, that your lordship is unfashionably diligent
in examining the candidates for holy orders ; yea, that your lordship is
generally at the pains of examining them yourse/f. Examining them ! in
what respects ? Why whether they understand a little Latin and Greek;
and can answer a few trite questions in the science of divinity ! Alas,
how little does this avail! Does your lordship examine, whether they
serve Christ or Belial ? Whether they love God or the world ? Whether
they ever had any serious thoughts about heaven or hell ? Whether they
have any real desire to save their own souls, or the souls of others ? If
not, what have they to do with holy orders ? and what will become of the
souls committed to their care ?
" My lord, I do by no means despise learning; I know the value of it
too well. But what is this, particularly in a Christian minister, compared
to piety ? What is it in a man that has no religion } ' As a jewel in a
swine's snout.'
" Some time since, I recommended to your lordship a plain man, whom
I had known above twenty years, as a person of deep, genuine piety,
and of unblamable conversation. But he neither understood Greek nor
Latin ; and he aflirmed, in so many words, that ' he believed it was his
duty to preach, whether he was ordained or no.' 1 believe so too. What
became of him since, I know not. But I suppose he received preshyteriaii
ordination; and I cannot blame him if he did. He might think any
ordination better than none.
" I do not know, that Mr. Hoskins had any favour to ask of the
Society. He asked the favour of your lordship to ordain him, that he
might minister to a little flock in America. But your lordship did not
see good to ordain ///;;/.• but your lordship did see good to ordain, and
send to America, other persons, who knew something of Greek and Latin;
but knew no more of saving souls, than of catching whales.
" In this respect, also, I mourn for poor America; for the sheep scat-
tered up and down therein. Part of them have no shepherds at all, par-
ticularly in the northern colonies ; and the case of the rest is little better,
for their own shepherds pity them not. They cannot, for they have no
pity on themselves, they take no thought or care about their own souls.
" Wishing your lordship every blessing from the great Shepherd and
Bishop of our souls, I remain, my lord, your lordship's dutiful son and
servant,
" John Wesley." ^
Did his lordship ever receive, from any other " dutiful son
' Whitehead's Life of Wesley, vol. ii., p. 392.
334 Life aiid Times of Wesley,
^780 and servant," a letter like this ? We doubt it. Wesley was
Age 77 foiled in his attempt to obtain episcopal ordination for an
American Methodist preacher: no wonder, that, soon after, he
administered ordination himself
Before proceeding with Wesley's history, the insertion of a
selection of his letters, belonging to this period, may be
acceptable.
It is a terrible thing to write a dangerous book. When
Joseph Benson was a young man, he read Dr. Watts's " Glory
of Christ as God-man," and became a convert to his doctrine
of the pre-existence of our Lord's htiman soul. Speaking his
mind too freely upon this unscriptural dogma, Benson was
suspected to be an Arian, and was represented as such, by
Dr. Coke, all over the kingdom.^ At the conference of 1780,
Coke accused him of holding the Arian heresy; the matter was
sifted; Benson was acquitted; and Coke offered to ask his
pardon. Still, Benson, for years afterwards, held Dr. Watts's
dangerous speculation ; and it was not until he undertook the
revision of Fletcher's manuscripts, that he laid aside the
expression, " pre-existent soul of Christ;''' "an expression,"
says he, "which neither reason, nor Scripture, nor antiquity,
will warrant our using." ^
Dr. Watts's pernicious book, and also the Gordon riots, (at
this time raging,) are referred to in the following extract from
a letter to Charles Wesley.
" Jicne 8, 1 780.
"Dear Brother, — I would not read over Dr. Watts's tract for a hundred
pounds. You may read it, and welcome. I will not, dare not, move those
subtle, metaphysical controversies. Arianism is not in question ; it is
Eutychianism or Nestorianism. But what are they .'' What neither I nor
any one else understands. But they are what tore the eastern and
western churches asunder.
^ Dr. Coke, a young man of thirty-three, displayed, at this period, a fussy
officiousness, which scarcely redounded to his honour. He wrote to
Bradburn, to the effect, that he suspected that he also was an Arian ;
though it was only four years before, that Thomas Taylor, at the London
conference, had blamed Bradburn for "preaching too much on the Divinity
of Christ, and for being too warm against the ylrians." (" Memoirs of
Bradburn," p. 225.) In an unpublished letter, addressed to Bradburn, and
dated October, 1779, Wesley asks: " Is there any truth in the report that
John Hampson has converted you to Arianism ?"
2 Benson's Life, by Macdonald, p. 108.
Rev. Bidan Bury Collins. 335
" It is well I accepted none of Lord George's invitations. If the govern- 1780
ment suffers this tamely, I know not what they will not suffer. . '_
" Mr. Collins is not under my direction ; nor am I at all accountable
for any steps he takes. He is not in connection with the Methodists.
He only helps us now and then. I will suffer no disputing at the con-
ference.
" Undoubtedly many of the patriots seriously intend to overturn the
government; but the hook is in their nose.
" P^^^^ ^^ ^^'^^ y°^ ^" ' "JOHN WESLEY." 1
The Mr. Collins, mentioned in the above extract, was Brian
Bury Collins, of the university of Cambridge, who, without
ever receiving a regular appointment, continued to assist
Wesley, in various parts of the kingdom, until Wesley's death
in 1791. A number of his manuscript letters, all written in
1779 and 1780, now lie before us, from which we learn, that
he regarded himself as having " an unlimited preaching com-
mission"; and that one of his great objects was to unite
Wesley's and Whitefield's followers. " I could freely die,"
says he, *' to see the Tabernacles and Foundery recon-
ciled." He began the year 1779 in the north of England,
where he sometimes preached five or six times a day. He
then removed to London, Bristol, and the west, where his
health failed. In May, 1780, he was among his relatives at .
Linwood, and wrote : ** I am not yet recovered from my late
illness, though I am much better than I have been. My
relations here receive me with more cordiality than I expected.
I find the Divine presence in the churches where I preach ;
but what the Lord designs to do with me I cannot tell.
Lately, I have thought of spending a few weeks at Cambridge.
I have also had fresh desires of being in full orders." In pur-
suance of this, Mr. Collins went to St. John's college, Cam-
bridge, where, in July 1780, he took his master of arts degree.
By advice of the two Wesleys, he sought ordination ; and the
dowager Lady Townsend gave him a recommendatory letter
to the Bishop of Chester, requesting that the rite might be
administered in private ; but the bishop, having heard of his
irregular preaching, hesitated until he had time to confer with
his brother bishops. Ordination was ultimately obtained ;
^ Wesley's Works, vol. xii., p. 137.
33^ Life and Times of Wesley.
1 7 So Collins married, and, for a time, was assistant to David
Age 77 Simpson, at Macclesfield ; after this, he again became a
rover, and preached in Wesley's and Lady Huntingdon's
chapels, and wherever else he had a chance. He writes :
" I wish to do good unto all. I do not love one and dislike
another. I can unite with all who are united to Jesus. I
care not for names in the least." ^
These glimpses of a man whom Wesley, to the end of life,
repeatedly mentions in his journals, will not be unwelcome.
Of his subsequent career we know nothing ; except that its
close was not as bright as its beginning. A son of his lies
interred in the burial ground of the new chapel in City
Road.2
One of the legislative acts of the conference of 1780 was
to enforce the old rule, that, in Methodist meeting-houses,
the men and women should sit apart. In galleries, where
they had always sat together, they might do so still ; but
in all new erected galleries, and in the seats below, the old
rule was to be rigidly observed. " If," said Wesley, " I come
into any new house, and see the men and women together, I
will immediately go out. I hereby give public notice of this.
Pray let it be observed."^
This sounds strangely at the present day ; but, for some
reason, it was with Wesley a matter of importance. Hence
also the following unpublished letter to the leaders at
Sheffield.
" Bristol, September 4, 1780.
" My dear Brethren, — Let the persons, who purpose to subvert the
Methodist plan, by mixing men and women together in your chapel, con-
sider the consequence of so doing. First, I will never set foot in it more.
Secondly, I will forbid any collection to be made for it in any of our
societies.
" I am, my dear brethren, your affectionate brother,
"John Wesley."
Two m.ore letters, now for the first time given to the
public, will be welcome. They were addressed to Samuel
Bradburn, who had been three years in Ireland, and was now
to remove to Keighley.
^ Manuscript letters. 2 Methodist Magazine, 1845, P- 1 17-
* Minutes, 1780.
Original Letters. 337
" Near Bristol, September 16, 1780. 1780
"Dear Sammy,— I wanted to have Betsy "[Mrs. Bradburn]"a little . — _
nearer me. And I wanted her to be acquainted with her twin soul, Miss
Ritchie, the fellow to whom I scarce know in England. But I do not like
your crossing the sea till your children are a little stronger. If there was
stormy weather, it might endanger their lives. Therefore, it is better
you should stay in Ireland a little longer. Athlone circuit will suit you
well ; and John Brcdin may be at Keighley \n your place.
" Now read over the minutes concerning the office of an assistant, and
exert yourself as to every branch of it. I fear the late assistant neglected
many articles ; dispersing the books in particular.
" My lov^e to Betsy. Let her love Molly Pennington for my sake.
" I am, etc., J. Wesley."
" London, October 28, 1780.
" Dear Sammy, — I am glad you are safe landed at Keighley. You
will find there
* ... a port of ease
From the rough rage of stormy seas.'
" There are many amiable and gracious souls in Cork ; but there are
few in the whole kingdom of Ireland to be named, (either for depth of
sense or grace,) with many, very many persons in Yorkshire, particularly
the west riding. Go to Betsy Ritchie, at Otley, and then point me out
such a young woman as she in Ireland.
" I think lemonade would cure any child of the flux.
" Now be exact in every branch of discipline ; and you will soon find
what a people you are among.
" I am, with tender love to Betsy, dear Sammy, your affectionate friend
and brother,
"John Wesley."
The following letter, kindly supplied by the Rev. Thomas
W. Smith, and now for the first time published, was
addressed " To Mr. Valton, at the preaching house, in Man-
chester." Oldham Street chapel was now in course of erection,
and was opened by Wesley seven months afterwards.
"Bristol, October i, 1780.
" My dear Brother, — I expected the state of Manchester circuit to
be just such as you have found it. But the power of the Lord is able to
heal them. I fear S. Mayers was left unemployed, because she loved
perfection. If you find a few more of the same spirit, I believe you will
find them employment. The accommodations everywhere will mend, if
the preachers lovingly exert themselves. I am glad you take some pains
for the new chapel. Our brother Brocklehurst will do anything that is
reasonable.
" In one thing only, you and I do not agree ; but, perhaps, we shall
VOL. in. Z
Age 77
338 Life and Times of Wesley.
1780 when we have prayed over it : I mean, the giving me an extract of your
life. I cannot see the weight of your reasons against it. * Some are
superficial.' What then ? All are not ; brother Mather's and Haime's
in particular. Add one to these ; a more weighty one, if you can. You
know what to omit, and what to insert. I really think you owe it (in
spite of shame and natural timidity) to God and me and your brethren.
Pray for light in this matter.
" I am, your affectionate friend and brother,
" J. Wesley."
The next, though short, is not devoid of interest. For the
first time, it was published in the Watchman newspaper, as
recently as October 12, 1870; and was written on tlie same
day as the foregoing one.
" Bristol, October i, 1780.
" My dear Brother,— Joseph Bradford has been at the gate of
death ; but is now so far recovered, that he thinks to set out to-morrow
morning, with me and his wife, for London.
" Mr. Brackenbury likewise seems to be better, with regard to his
bodily health ; but he is married ! And I shall not be much disappointed
if he soon takes leave of the Methodists.
" I am, your affectionate brother,
" J. Wesley."
The following, which has not before been published, is
kindly furnished by Charles Reed, Esq., M.P.
" London, November 3, 1780.
" My dear Brother, — Disorderly walkers are better excluded than
retained ; and I am well satisfied you will exclude no others. I am glad
you have made a beginning at Trowbridge. If it be possible, say not one
offensive word. But you must declare the plain, genuine gospel; and,
sooner or later, God will give you His blessing.
" I am, your affectionate friend and brother,
"J. Wesley."
Another, equally characteristic, was sent to Zechariah.
Yewdall, stationed in " Glamorganshire " circuit, which ex-
tended (from Llanelly in Wales to Calvert in Gloucester-
shire) above a hundred miles, and was traversed regularly
every month. Mr. Yewdall was now in the second year of
his itinerancy, and, at Monmouth, had met with brutal
treatment.^ The letter also refers to the principle involved
in Mr. M'Nab's affair.
^ Methodist Magazine, 1 795, p. 268.
Sir Harry Trelawney. 339
" London, December 3, 1780. 1 780
" My dear Brother, — You mistake one thing. It is I, not the con- ^J^-,-,
ference, (according to the twelfth rule,) that station the preachers ; but I
do it at the time of the conference, that I may have the advice of my
brethren. But I have no thought of removing you from the Glamorgan-
shire circuit ; you are just in your right place. But you say, * Many of
the people are asleep.' They are ; and you are sent to awaken them out
of sleep. * But they are dead.' True ; and you are sent to raise the dead.
Good will be done at Monmouth * and Neath in particular. Where no
good can be done, I would leave the old, and try new places. But you
have need to be all alive yourselves, if you would impart life to others.
And this cannot be without much self denial.
" I am, dear Zachary, your affectionate brother,
"John Wesley." 2
After the conference at Bristol was concluded, Wesley
set out for Cornwall. Some time before this, Sir Harry
Trelawney, a student of Christ Church, Oxford, had become
a zealous revivalist, and had begun to preach at West Looe,
where. In 1777, he became the pastor of a congregation
of his own raising, and which worshipped in a meeting-
house fitted up at his own expense. The novelty of the
proceeding, and the rank of the preacher, created great
excitement. Sir Harry, the descendant of one of the seven
bishops who were committed to the Tower in the reign of
James H., was made the hero of a witty book, written by
a clergyman of the Church of England, and entitled, " The
Spiritual Quixote ; or the History of Geofifry Wildgoose,
Esq." 3 vols., i2mo : 1773. The preaching baronet vin-
dicated his nonconformity in " A Letter addressed to the
Rev. Thomas Alcock, Vicar of Runcorn." For a time,
the Rev. John Clayton was his assistant, but, in 1778,
removed to the Weigh House congregation, in London.
Soon after. Sir Harry returned to Oxford ; procured ordina-
tion in the national establishment ; was made a country
rector in the west of England; whilst his chapel at West
Looe was ignominiously changed into a house for converting
barley into malt. He died in 1834.
It was about the time of Wesley's visit to Cornwall, that
^ Wesley's words were verified. At Monmouth Mr. Yewdall was
mobbed by a bellowing rabble ; but the society increased one third.
2 Wesley's Works, vol. xiii., p. lo.
340 Life and Times of Wesley.
^780 he wrote the subjoined letter. Sir Harry had been a
Age 77 Calvinist, and had been patronised by the Countess' of
Huntingdon's connexion ; but, having renounced his Cal-
vinian tenets, he was now regarded Avith disfavour. Some
communication had passed between him and Wesley on
the subject ; Wesley knew his danger ; and wrote to him as
follows. ,
" For a long time, I have had a desire to see you, but could not find
an opportunity. Indeed, I had reason to beheve my company would
not be agreeable ; as you were intimate with those who think they do
God service by painting me in the most frightful colours. It gives me
much satisfaction to find, that you have escaped out of the hands of those
warm men. It is not at all surprising, that they should speak a little
unkindly of you too in their turn. It gave me no small satisfaction
to learn from your own lips the falsehood of their allegation. I believed
it false before, but could not affirm it so positively as I can do now.
" Indeed, it would not have been without precedent, if from one
extreme you had run into another. This was the case with that great
man, Dr. Taylor. For some years, he was an earnest Calvinist ; but,
afterwards, judging he could not go far enough from that melancholy
system, he ran, not only into Arianism, but into the very dregs of
Socinianism.
" You have need to be thankful on another account likewise ; that is,
that your prejudices against the Church of England are removing.
Having had an opportunity of seeing several of the churches abroad,
and having deeply considered the several sorts of Dissenters at home, I
am fully convinced, that our own Church, with all her blemishes, is
nearer the scriptural plan than any other in Europe.
" I sincerely wish you may retain your former zeal for God ; only, that
it may be a zeal according to knowledge. But there certainly will be a
danger of your sinking into a careless, lukewarm state, without any
zeal or spirit at all. As you were surfeited with an irrational, un-
scriptural religion, you may easily slide into no religion at all ; or into
a dead form, that will never make you happy either in this world, or in
that which is to come.
" Wishing every spiritual blessing, both to Lady Trelawney and you,
" I am, dear sir, your affectionate servant,
"John Wesley." *
Wesley, at the end of August, returned to Bristol, and
here he spent the month of September. He then set out
for London, which he reached on October 7. A week later
^ Whitehead's Life of Wesley, vol. ii., p. 395.
Wesley, oji yacob Behmen. 341
he made a tour to Tunbridge Wells, and other towns in 1780
Kent. After this, we find him, as usual, visiting the Age~77
societies in Northamptonshire, Oxfordshire, and Bedford-
shire. The last month of the year was chiefly employed in
London. He read to the society, and explained, the Large
Minutes of conference, recently published ; and wrote : " I
desire to do all things openly and above board. I would
have all the world, and especially all of our society, see not
only the steps we take, but the reasons why we take them."
He visited Lord George Gordon in the Tower. He went
with some of his friends to the British Museum. He WTote
his well known sermon on " This is the true God and eternal
life," fully establishing the doctrine which Joseph Benson,
at the conference, had been accused of denying — the Divinity
of Christ.^ He likewise wrote his " Thoughts upon Jacob
Behmen," allowing the Teuton to be a good man, but
charging him with propounding " a crude, indigested philo-
sophy, supported neither by Scripture, nor reason, nor any-
thing but his own ipse dixit ;" and with using "language that
was never used since the world began, queerness itself,
mere dog Latin." " None," says Wesley, " can understand
it without much pains, perhaps not without reading him
thrice over. I would not read him thrice over on any
consideration. (i) Because it would be enough to crack
any man's brain to brood so long over such unintelligible
nonsense ; and (2) because such a w^aste of time might
provoke God to give me up to a strong delusion to believe
a lie." 2
Wesley concludes the year with the following entiy in
his journal. " Sunday, ' December 31 — We renewed our
covenant with God. We had the largest company that I
ever remember ; perhaps two hundred more than we had
last year. And we had the greatest blessing. Several
received either a sense of the pardoning love of God, or
power to love Him with all their heart."
Happy, happy old man ! " I do not remember," said
he, only nine days before the year 1780 was ended, " I do
* Methodist Magazine, 1781, p. 189.
2 Wesley's Works, vol. ix., p. 491.
342 Life and Times of Wesley.
rySo not remember to have felt lowness of spirits for one quarter
Age 77 of an hour since I was born." ^
It only remains to notice Wesley's publications in 1780 ;
and this shall be done as briefly as possible. His letters on
popery, his revised minutes of the conferences, and his
Thoughts upon Behmen, have been already mentioned.
Besides these, there were — •
1. "Directions for Renewing our Covenant with God."
i2mo, 23 pages.
2. " Reflections on the Rise and Progress of the American
Rebellion." i2mo, 96 pages.
3. " The History of Henry, Earl Moreland." Abridged.
2 vols., i2mo.
It has been already stated, that this was a novel, written
by Mr. Brooke, and originally published, in five vols., in 1766,
with the title, " The Fool of Quality." Dr. Adam Clarke
once stated, that Mr. Brooke's nephew declared to him, that,
" with the exception of a few touches of colouring, everything
in the book was founded in fact — even the very incidents
were facts." ^ This might be so ; but still the colouring made
the work a fiction ; and that an old evangelist, like Wesley,
bordering on fourscore years of age, should revise, abridge,
publish, and circulate a novel, has always been a perplexity to
a certain section of Wesley's admirers. John Easton, one of
his itinerants, belonged to these. After John had very freely
condemned the conduct of his great leader, Wesley proposed
to him the following interrogations in reference to three of
the personages in this remarkable book.
Wesley. — " Did you read Vindex, John V
Easton.—^'' Yes, sir."
W.—"- Did you laugh, John ?"
ii.— " No, sir."
W. — " Did you read Damon and Pythias, John ?"
£■.— " Yes, sir."
W.—'' Did you cry, John ?"
£".— " No, sir."
W., hfting up his eyes, and clasping his hands, exclaimed : " O earth
— earth — earth !"^
^ Methodist Magazme, 1781, p. 185.
2 Everett's Life of Clarke. ^ Ibid.
*' The Fool of Quality.'" 343
Whatever may be thought and said on the general subject 1780
of novels and novel reading, all must admit, that "Henry, Earl k^i^
Moreland," is one of the most unexceptionable ever pub-
lished. Wesley writes :
" I recommend it as the most excellent in its kind, that I have seen,
either in the English or any other language. The lowest excellence
therein is the style, which is not only pure in the highest degree, not
only clear and proper, every word being used in its true genuine meaning,
but frequently beautiful and elegant, and, where there is room for it, truly
sublime. But what is of far greater value is the admirable sense, which
is conveyed herein : as it sets forth in full view most of the important
truths, which are revealed in the oracles of God. And these are not only
well illustrated, but also proved in an easy, natural manner: so that the
thinking reader is taught, without any trouble, the most essential doctrines
of religion.
" But the greatest excellence of all in this treatise is, that it continually
strikes at the heart. It perpetually aims at inspiring and increasing
every right affection. And it does this, not by dry, dull, tedious precepts,
but by the liveliest examples that can be conceived : by setting before
your eyes one of the most beautiful pictures, that was ever drawn in the
world. The strokes of this are so delicately fine, the touches so easy,
natural, and affecting, that I know not who can survey it with tearless
eyes, unless he has a heart of stone. I recommend it, therefore, to all
those who are already, or desire to be, lovers of God and man."
The whole of this is strictly accurate; and if this is not
enough to justify Wesley in the eyes of faultfinders, like
earthy John Easton, the task of doing so must be abandoned
as a hopeless one. Besides, it may be added, that, if Wesley
sinned, his successors copied his example ; for, twenty-two
years after Wesley's death, the conference book-room pub-
lished a fourth edition of the novel which Wesley first pub-
lished in 1780.
4. "A Collection of Hymns for the use of the People called
Methodists." i2mo, 520 pages.
Up to this period, the hymns and the books used in Method-
ist congregations had been endlessly varying; now Wesley
issued a book which, with slight alterations, has been used
from that time to this ; and prefixed the preface which has
been read by millions ; and from which, therefore, we must
content ourselves with quoting only the concluding hint,
which is far more needed now than even when first published.
"Many gentlemen have done my brother and me (though without
344 Life and Times of Wesley.
naming us) the honour to reprint many of our hymns. Now they are
perfectly welcome so to do, provided they print them just as they are.
But I desire they would not attempt to mend them ; for they really are
not able. None of them is able to mend either the sense or the verse.
Therefore, I must beg of them one of these two favours : either to let
them stand just as they are, to take them for better for worse ; or to add
the true reading in the margin, or at the bottom of the page ; that we may
no longer be accountable either for the nonsense or for the doggerel of
other men."
5. Wesley's only other publication, in 1780, was his Ar-
minian Magazine, 8vo, 6Z^ pages,* The work contains Good-
win's Paraphrase on Romans ix. ; an extract from Bird's
" Fate and Destiny, inconsistent with Christianity ; " lives of
Armelle Nicolas and Gregory Lopes ; short accounts of
Thomas Lee, Alexander Mather, John Haime, Thomas
Mitchell, Thomas Taylor, Thomas Hanson, Thomas Hanby,
and John IMason. There are about fifty valuable letters ; and
about seventy poetic pieces. Also Wesley's " Thought on
Necessity," and " Thoughts upon Taste."
To enlarge concerning these is superfluous. The volume
was quite equal to the former ones; though Wesley confesses,
that the portraits were not yet such as he desired; and de-
clares, that he will have better, or none at all.
* I am not quite sure of this. In 1780, a i2mo tract of 12 pages was
published with the following title: — "Jesus, altogether Lovely : or, a Letter
to some of the Single Women of the Methodist Society. London: Printed
by R. Hawes ; and sold at the New Chapel, in the City Road ; and at the
Rev. Mr. Wesley's Preaching Houses, in town and country. 1780." The
letter is dated, " Hoxton, March 10, 1763." It enforces chastity, poverty,
and obedience; and is written in a style strongly resembling Wesley's.
I78I.
WESLEY purposed to visit Ireland in 178 1, but was 1781
prevented doing so ; and, hence, the months he Age"-8
was accustomed to spend in that island were spent in an
irregular itinerancy through England and Wales. He now
entered on the seventy-ninth year of his age ; and, to obtain
something like a correct idea of his amazing energy and toil,
it may be useful to trace his footsteps more minutely than we
have been wont to do during the last few years.
He writes: "January i, 1781 — We began, as usual, the
service at four" (in the morning) "praising Him who, maugre all
our enemies, had brought us safe to the beginning of another
year."
At this period, his nephews, Charles and Samuel Wesley,
were attracting great attention by their musical performances.
They had won the friendship of the great musical composers.
Dr. Boyce, Dr. Nares, and Dr. Burney. Lords Le Despencer,
Barrington, Aylesford, Dudley, and others, were enraptured
with them. The Earl of Mornington, for some years, break-
fasted weekly with them. Dr. Howard, the distinguished
organist, declared concerning Samuel, that he seemed to have
"dropped down from heaven." Charles was introduced to
George HI., with whom he became a great favourite. The
result of this unparalleled popularity was the institution, in
Wesley's brother's house, of the series of select concerts,
already referred to, which were continued for several years,
the regular subscribers varying in number from thirty to fifty,
though eighty persons were often present ; including not a
few of the English nobility, besides the Bishop of London,
and the Danish and Saxon ambassadors. On January 25,
Wesley was there, and wrote : " I spent an agreeable hour
at a concert of my nephews. But I was a little out of my
element among lords and ladies. I love plain music and
plain company best."
It was during this brief sojourn in London, in the beginning
n
46 JLt/e and Times of Wesley.
1781 of 1 78 1, that Wesley wrote his stinging sermon on "Little
Age 78 children, keep yourselves from idols'';^ and his able discourse
on, "For this purpose was the Son of God manifested, that
He might destroy the works of the devil." In the former
he terribly belabours the man of business, who retires from the
activities of town to the laziness of country life, where his
only employment is altering, enlarging, rebuilding, or decorat-
ing the old mansion house he has purchased, and improving
the stables, outhouses, and grounds, without ever thinking of
the God of heaven any more than he thinks of the king of
France. In the latter sermon, he strikes a heavy blow at the
heresy of Dr. Watts, which Benson, at the conference of
1780, had been accused of embracing. He writes:
" I cannot at all believe the ingenious dream of Dr. Watts, concerning
the glorious humanity of Christ, which he supposes to have existed before
the Avorld began, and to have been endued with, I know not what,
astonishing powers. Nay, I look upon this to be an exceeding dangerous,
yea, mischievous hypothesis ; as it quite excludes the force of very many
Scriptures, which have been hitherto thought to prove the Godhead of the
Son. And, I am afraid, it was the grand means of turning that great man
aside from the faith once delivered to the saints ; that is, if he was turned
aside, if that beautiful soliloquy be genuine, which is printed among his
posthumous works, wherein he so earnestly beseeches the Son of God not
to be displeased, because he cannot believe Him to be coequal and co-
eternal with the Father."
Both these sermons enriched the Arniinian Magazine for
178 1. In fact, it is to the establishment of that periodical,
that we are indebted for many of the most elaborated sermons
that Wesley ever published. Besides the two above mentioned,
Wesley, during the year 1781, wrote at least three others.
His sermon on " Zeal " is a remarkable production, and was
not inappropriate to the circumstances of a period when so
much excitement existed concerning popery. He says :
" Fervour for opinion is not Christian zeaL How innumerable are the
mischiefs which this species of false zeal has occasioned in the Christian
world ! How many of the excellent of the earth have been cut off, by
zealots, for the senseless opinion of tran substantiation ! Fervour for
indiffei-ent tilings is not Christian zeal. How warmly did Bishop Ridley,
and Bishop Hooper, and other great men of that age, dispute about
the sacerdotal vestments ! How eager was the contention, for almost a
* Methodist Magazine^ 1781, p. 303.
JVeslcy writing Sermons. 347
hundred years, for and against wearing a surplice! Oh, shame to man ! 1 781
I would as soon have disputed about a straw, or a barleycorn ! " ^ A~78
Another of his homilies, written in 1781/ was his able
discourse on the province of reason in matters of religion ;
and another was his unique sermon on " The Brute Creation,"
in which he unhesitatingly propounds the doctrine, not only
that the brute creation will live again, but likewise, that,
when restored, they will possess a far higher state of being
than they possess at present ; in fact, that they will then be
made what beasts, birds, insects, and fishes were when first
created,^ This may seem a wild theory for an octogenarian
to advance ; but it deserves more attention, on that account,
than if it had been an imaginative rocket let off by a stripling
in his teens.
While on the subject of sermons, it may be added, that it
was now Wesley published, in his Arminian Magazine,
his remarkable discourse on the " Danger of Riches," — the
first of a series on that subject, which he continued to issue
to the end of life, and in which wealthy Methodists and others
are lashed with terrific power. " I do not remember," says he,
" that in threescore years I have heard one sermon preached
on this subject. And what author, within the same term, has
declared it from the press ? I do not know one. I have seen
two or three who just touch upon it ; but none that treat
of it professedly. I have myself frequently touched upon it
in preaching, and twice in what I have published to the
world : once in explaining our Lord's sermon on the mount,
and once in the discourse on the mammon of unrighteous-
ness. But I have never yet either published or preached
any sermon expressly upon the subject. It is high time
I should ; that I should at length speak as strongly and
explicitly as I can, in order to leave a full and clear testimony
behind me, whenever it pleases God to call me hence."
One extract from this striking sermon must suffice.
" O ye Methodists, hear the word of the Lord ! I have a message
from God to all men ; but to yoii above all. Yox above forty years, I
have been a servant to you and to your fathers. And I have not been
^ Methodist Magazine, 1781, p. 522. ^Vdxdi. p. 636.
3 Ibid. 1782, p. 69.
o
48 Life and Times of Wesley.
1 781 as a reed shaken by the wind; I have not varied in my testimony. I
— have testified to you the very same thing, from the first day even until
^^ ^ now. But who hath believed our report? I fear not many rich. I fear
there is need to apply to some of yoti those terrible words of the apostle :
* Go to now, ye rich men ! Weep and howl for the miseries which shall
come upon you. Your gold and silver is cankered, and the rust of
them shall witness against you, and shall eat your flesh as it were fire.'
Certainly it will, unless you both save all you can, and give all you can.
But who of you hath considered this, since you first heard the will of the
Lord concerning it ? Who is now determined to consider and practise
it ? By the grace of God, begin to day !
" O ye lovers of money, hear the word of the Lord ! Suppose ye, that
money, though multiplied as the sand of the sea, can give you happi-
ness ? Then you are given up to a strong delusion, to believe a lie — a
palpable lie, confuted daily by a thousand experiments. Open your eyes.
Look all around you ! Are the richest men the happiest ? Have those
the largest share of content, who have the largest possessions? Is not
the very reverse true? Is it not a common observation, that the richest
of men are, in general, the most discontented, the most miserable? Had
not the far greater part of them more content, when they had less money ?
Look into your own breasts. If you are increased in goods, are you pro-
portionably increased in happiness ? You have more substance ; but have
you more content ? You know the contrary. You know that, in seeking
happiness from riches, you are only striving to drink out of empty cups.
And let them be painted and gilded ever so finely, they are empty still."
Before we recur to Wesley's journal, an unpublished letter
may be acceptable.
The preachers "now labouring in the Sheffield circuit were
James Rogers, Alexander M'Nab, and Samuel Bardsley. Mr.
Rogers writes : " One of my fellow labourers did not lovingly
draw in the same yoke, and soon after left the connexion.
The uneasiness occasioned in the society by his disaffection,
for some months, threatened us with disagreeable conse-
quences ; and our enemies expected a considerable division
amone us; but 'He that sitteth above the waterfloods '
found means to prevent it. So that instead of losing in
our number, we found, at the end of the year, an increase
of ninety-seven members."
Of course, this refers to Alexander M'Nab, who had
rebelled against Wesley's authority in 1779. Samuel
Bardsley was a man of peace, and, moreover, one of the
most laborious preachers Wesley had. Besides his pulpit
labours, he had rendered great service to the Sheffield society.
Samuel Bardsleys begging Tour. 349
by a preaching excursion, undertaken for the purpose of 1781
obtaining subscriptions for their chapel. His collecting book Age~78
is before us, with a list of the collections he made, and the
donations he obtained, in a tour extending from Sheffield to
York, thence to Hull, and thence, along the east coast, to
Newcastle on Tyne. Altogether, he gathered the sum of
iJ"89 I5J-. 11^/.; and, in doing this, made thirty-one public
collections, amounting, in the aggregate, to ;^30 1 5 J. 6f<^.,
and begged the balance of ^^59 os. Af\d., of considerably more
than three hundred different subscribers, including in this
number the inhabitants of not fewer than forty-four towns
and villages, whose munificent donations are lumped together.
When Bardsley had completed his tour, Wesley wrote him as
follows.
"Near London, February 10, 1781.
"Dear Sammy, — I did not doubt but you would agree with the
people of Sheffield. They are a loving and affectionate people. I am
glad you were so successful in your labour of love for them. That
assistance was very seasonable.
" That misunderstanding, which was troublesome for a season, may
now be buried for ever, I am perfectly well satisfied, both of the honesty
and affection, both of brother Woodcroft and brother Birks. So Satan's
devices are brought to nought.
" I doubt not but James Rogers and you recommend our books in every
place, and the magazines in particular, which will be a testimony for me,
when I am no more seen.
" I am, dear Sammy, your affectionate brother,
"John Wesley."'
On the 1 2th of February, Wesley set out on a week's
excursion to Norfolk and back again to London, preaching
at least ten sermons on the way ; ^ and, in wintry weather,
travelling more than two hundred miles.
Having spent a few more days in London, he then started,
on Sunday, INIarch 4, (as he thought,) for Ireland, but spent a
fortnight in the vicinity of Bath and Bristol. Leaving
Bristol on March 19, eleven days were occupied in reaching
Manchester, during which he preached more than twenty
sermons, some of them in the open air.
On ]\Iarch 30, he opened the chapel in Oldham Street,
' Original manuscript letter.
2 Methodist Magazine, 1845, p. 8.
350 Life and Times of Wesley.
1 781 Manchester. He writes : "Friday, March 30 — I opened the
A"e~78 risw chapel at Manchester, about the size of that in London.
The whole congregation behaved with the utmost seriousness.
I trust much good will be done in this place. Sunday, April I
— I began reading prayers at ten o'clock. Our country friends
flocked in from all sides. At the communion was such a sight
as I am persuaded was never seen in Manchester before :
eleven or twelve hundred communicants at once ; and all of
them fearing God."
Thus began the history of a building, which, next to the
chapel in City Road, is the most interesting Methodist
edifice in existence. First of all, the Manchester Methodists
had been located in a miserable room on or near the present
site of Bateman's Buildings. Removing thence, in 1750, they
worshipped for thirty years in their first chapel, which, up to
a recent period, was a warehouse in Birchin Lane.^ Among
the first members, in that old chapel, were : Mary Bromley,
for seventy years a Methodist, who died happy in God, at the
age of eighty-nine, in 1826 : — Mrs. Leech, an upright follower
of Christ, who expired in the full assurance of a blessed
immortality in 1770: — John Morris, whose autobiography, in
the Arminian Magazine for 1795, will be found to be full of
more than romantic interest : — Mr. Fildes, who, in the same
year in which Raikes began his work at Gloucester, opened a
Sunday-school in a Manchester cellar, a second in a garret,
and a third in the first room in Manchester built expressly
for Sunday-school purposes, a room erected at Mr, Fildes'
own expense, behind his own dwelling house, in the neigh-
bourhood of London Road '} — Adam Oldham, a feltmaker,
one of the first trustees of Birchin Lane chapel,^ who lived in a
house on the site which theAlbion Hotel now occupies, for many
years a useful Methodist,* but afterwards a rich backslider, to
whom Oldham Street owes its name : — Richard Barlow, who,
for sixty-five years, rose at half-past four in summer, and at
five in winter : — Mr. Brierley, a member of Peter Kenworthy's
class, the leading singer in Oldham Street chapel, and after-
wards a magistrate : — John Moseley, a poor hatter in Mill-
^ Methodist Magazine, 1851, p. 556. ^ Ibid, i860, p. 379.
' Manuscript. ■* Methodist Magazine, 1782, p. 331.
MetJiodism in Manchester, and Bolton. 351
gate, the grandfather of Sir Oswald Moseley, from whom 1781
Moseley Street derived its name : — and Mrs. Bennett, a Age^S
relative of John Moseley 's, and the first female classleader in
Manchester.! We wish we had space for details respecting
these old Manchester Methodist worthies, who deserve far
more honourable record than they have yet received.
From Manchester, Wesley went to Bolton, where he writes:
"The society here are true, original Methodists. They are
not conformed to the world, either in its maxims, its spirit, or
its fashions ; but are simple followers of the Lamb ; conse-
quently they increase both in grace and number."
This was a high compliment to pay to George Escrick and
his friends. Their old chapel in New Acres had been con-
verted into cottages ; and, in 1776, they had built another in
Ridgway Gates, though not without a united and great effort.
The Rev. Mr. Fowles, a clergyman, had the management of
a sandbed from which they had to obtain their sand ; and
hearing of their intentions, he announced, that, after the
expiration of five days, the sand would be charged half-a-
crown a load. This, to the poor Methodists, was a serious
matter ; but George Escrick was a man of too much
energy to be easily defeated. Accordingly, he, at once,
requested all the Methodists, young and old, strong and
feeble, active and otherwise, to repair with him to the
sandpit, and to dig and convey away all the sand they
needed. To a man, they obeyed George's injunction, and, in
a single day, got as much as their intended chapel was
likely to require. Michael Fenwick was then their preacher,
and kept running over the half-a-mile distance, between the
site of the new chapel and the clerical sandbed, encouraging
the people in their task, and, at one time, wanting to sing the
hymn beginning with "Before Jehovah's awful throne"; but
blunt George Escrick, the weaver, imperatively stopped his
spiritual superior, telling him to take a spade in his hand, for
there was a time for all things, and this was a time to dig.
In this old Ridgway Gates cliapel, William Grime used to
conduct a band meeting every Sunday morning at four
o'clock ; and, beneath it, Parson Greenwood, one of the
* Manuscript.
352 Life and Times of IVesley.
^7^1 circuit preachers, whose only home was two neighbouring
Age 78 attics, used to keep his victuals.^ The head of the circuit
was Liverpool, and the following were the munificent sums
contributed quarterly, by the several societies, in 1776, when
the chapel was completed. Liverpool, ^^5 8j-. ()d. ; Bolton,
£"] \\s. yd.; Preston, lis.; Wigan, £1 los.; Meols, lis. ; Top
of Coal Pits, lys. ; Edgeworth, lOi". 6d. ; Moulden Water,
ys.) Shackerley, ioj-. ; Aspul Moor, ys.) Chowbent, los. 6d.;
Warrington, £1 is.) Northwich, £1 is.; Budworth, 12s. ^d. ;
Little Leigh, £1 gs. 6d. ; and Lamberhead Green, ys. 6d.
. Such was Liverpool circuit in 1776 ; and, out of these
Methodist contributions, three Methodist preachers and their
families had to be supported. No wonder that the cupboard,
beneath the pulpit of the old chapel, was big enough to serve
Parson Greenwood for a pantry.
From Bolton, Wesley went to Wigan, and preached a
funeral sermon for Betty Brown, one of the first members of
Wigan society, " beloved of God, the delight of His children,
a dread to wicked men, and a torment to devils."
Leaving Wigan, Wesley proceeded to Chester, and thence
to Alpraham, where he did for " good old sister Cawley, a
mother in Israel, and a pattern of all good works," what he
had done for Betty Brown. Arriving at Warrington, he says :
" I put a stop to a bad custom, which was creeping in here :
a few men, who had fine voices, sang a psalm which no
one knew, in a tune fit for an opera, wherein three, four, or
five persons sung different words at the same time ! What
an insult upon common sense ! What a burlesque upon public
worship ! No custom can excuse such a mixture of profane-
ness and absurdity."
Desiring to reach Ireland as soon as possible, Wesley em-
barked at Liverpool, on the 12th of April; but, on getting
out to sea, was overtaken with a storm ; and, in an hour, was
so affected as he had not been for forty years before. For
two days, he was unable to swallow anything solid larger than
a pea, and was bruised and- sore from head to foot, and ill
able to turn himself in bed. The sea grew rougher ; the
horses of Wesley and his companions became turbulent ; and
' Manuscript.
Mary Charlton.
JO J
the hatches were closed. Water, three feet in depth, was in 17S1
the hold ; the ship refused to obey the helm, and was Age 7S
furiously driving on lee shore. Wesley says : " I called our
brethren, Floyd, Snowden, and Bradford, to prayers ; and we
found free access to the throne of grace. Soon after, we got,
I know not how, into Holyhead harbour, after being suffi-
ciently buffeted by the winds and waves for two days and
two nights. The niDre I considered, the more I was con-
vinced, it was not the will of God I should go to Ireland at
this time. So we went into the stage coach without delay,
and the next evening came to Chester."
Baffled in his purpose to visit Ireland, Wesley set out on a
preaching tour to Whitchurch, Shrewsbury, Brecon, Broseley,
Worcester, Brecknock, Carmarthen, Pembroke, Haverford-
west, Tracoon, Newport, Narberth, Llanelly, Swansea, Neath,
Bridgend, Cowbridge, Cardiff, and Monmouth. On the i6th
of May, he got back to W^orcester, having completed the
circuit in a month, and preached about thirty times.
He now proceeded to Kidderminster, Salop, Whitchurch,
Nantwich, Northwich, and, on May 18, arrived in Manchester,
having preached each night and morning.
At Manchester, he writes : " I preached a funeral sermon
for Mary Charlton, an Israelite indeed. From the hour that
she first knew the pardoning love of God, she never lost
sight of it for a moment. Eleven years ago, she believed that
God had cleansed her from all sin ; and she showed, that
she had not believed in vain, by her holy and unblamable
conversation."
Molly Charlton was the sweetheart of good old Samuel
Bardsley, the only one he ever had. They wished to marry ;
but the difficulty of providing for married preachers was so
great, that Wesley and Pawson interfered, and the nuptial
engagement was broken off. In four quarto manuscript
volumes, containing Bardsley's diary, and in Pawson's letter
concerning this business, and likewise the letter of poor
disappointed Molly (all in the writer's possession), there are
some racy facts, and traits of personal character, which may
be given to the public at some future time.
Leaving Manchester on May 21, Wesley made his way to
Warrington, Chowbent, Bolton, Kabb, Blackburn, and Preston.
VOL. III. A A
354 Z?/^ and Times of Wesley.
1781 In reference to the last mentioned place, he writes : "May
Age~7S -4 — I went on to Preston, where the old prejudice seems to
be quite forgotten. The little society has fitted up a large
and convenient room, where I preached to a candid audience:
Every one seemed to be considerably affected."
Who was the founder of this little society ? Twelve years
previous to Wesley's visit, John Wood, one of the first
Methodists at Padiham, attended Preston sessions, to obtain
a licence to preach. Having granted it, one of the magis-
trates, a clergyman, seeing a number of rude and noisy
people outside the sessions house, said to John, perhaps with
more sarcasm than sincerity: "There, go and reform that
crowd !" John bowed, thanked his worship for his licence,
left the court, entered the crowd in full authority, and
preached in peace.^ Six years after this, in 177S, Samuel
Bradburn formed the first Methodist class in Preston;^ and
now, in 178 1, Martha Thompson, Roger Crane, William
Bramwell, of immortal memory, and a few others, had hired
an old calendering house, in Lord Street, for a place of
meeting, and had fairly begun a work in proud Preston,
which, despite the popery of the place, has grown into
one of the most prosperous societies in the kingdom.
Wesley next proceeded to the Isle of Man, where he spent
eight days, " visited the island round, east, south, north, and
west " ; preached, at least, a dozen times ; and, in a popula-
tion of thirty thousand, found above two thousand Methodists,
with a score of "stout, well looking" local preachers, not
surpassed in England. " I was thoroughly convinced," says
he, "that we have no such circuit as this, cither in
England, Scotland, or Ireland. It is shut up from the
world ; and, having little • trade, is visited by scarce any
strangers. Here are no papists, no Dissenters of any kind,
no Calvinists, no disputers. Here is no opposition, either
from the governor, from the bishop, or from the bulk of the
clergy. One or two of them did oppose for a time ; but
they seem now to understand better. So that we have now
rather too little than too much reproach. The natives are a
plain, artless, simple people; unpolished, that is, unpolluted;
' Manuscript. * Bradburn's Memoirs, p. 47.
Fair weather Preachers. 355
few of them are rich or genteel ; the far greater part, mode- 1781
rately poor. The local preachers are men of faith and love, A^yS
knit together in one mind and one judgment They speak
either Manx or English, and follow a regular plan, which the
assistant gives them monthly."
On leaving the Isle of Man, Wesley proceeded to New-
castle, preaching, on the way, at Cockermouth, Ballantyne,
and Carlisle.
Can it be that this flying evangelist was an old man of
nearly eighty } No wonder that he sometimes sang —
" Oh that without one lingering groan
I may the welcome word receive,
My body with my charge lay down,
And cease at once to work and live !"
Without work, Wesley could not live. The following un-
published letter, written at this period, is strongly character-
istic of the man. It was addressed to Samuel Bradburn, at
Keighley.
''June 16, 1781.
" Dear Sammy, — We have no supernumerary preachers, except
John Furz, who is so from old age. If John Oliver lives till the con-
ference, and desires it, I suppose he may be upon the same footing.
The more exercise he uses, winter or summer, the more health he will
have, I can face the north wind at seventy-seven better than I could at
seven-and-twenty. But if you nioait over him, you will kill him outright.
A word in your ear. I am but half pleased with Christopher Hopper's
proceedings.^ I do not 3.dm\xe fair weather preachers. You must stop
local preachers who are loaded with debt. There are few healthier
places in England than Keighley. Neither Dublin nor Cork is to com-
pare with it. But have a care ! or you will kill Betsy ! Do not constrain
God to take her away !
" I am, dear Sammy, your affectionate friend and brother,
"John Wesley."
Wesley spent eight days at Newcastle, and in its vicinity,
and preached, at least, ten or a dozen times. He then visited
his societies between there and York. At Thirsk, in a
letter to his brother, Wesley wTOte :
"Thirsk, Juue 27, 1781.
"Dear Brother, — This is the last day of my seventy-eighth year;
and (such is the power of God) I feel as if it were my twenty-eighth.
Next Saturday, I expect to be at Epworth ; the second, at Boston ; the
^Then at Colne, in the thirty-fourth year of his itinerancy.
2)^6 Life and Times of Wesley.
17S1 third, at Sheffield. I take the opportunity of a broken year, to visit
.■~^g those parts of Lincolnshire, which I have not seen before, but once, these
twenty years.
"From several, I have lately heard, that God has blessed your preach-
ing. See your calling! 'Cease at once to work and live!' Peace be
with all your spirits !
"John Wesley."^
Two days after this, Wesley arrived at Epworth, and
wrote : " I have now preached thrice a day for seven days
following ; but it is just the same as if it had been but one."
Twelve days were spent in Lincolnshire, during which he
preached more than a score of sermons. Among other places,
Grantham was favoured with his ministry. He writes :
"July 9 — I preached at Grantham, in the open air, for no
house would contain the congregation; and none made the
least disturbance."
At the village of Welby, the Rev. W. Dodwell was
minister ; and, in his church, Wesley preached twice on the
day before he preached at Grantham, Mr. Dodwell was
the pastor of Welby parish for nearly half a century, and
died in 1824, when he presented, by deed of gift, i^ 10,000
to the Wesleyan Missionary Society, and an equal sum to
the British and Foreign Bible Society.^ He was present at
Wesley's conference of preachers in 1782.'
After visiting many other societies in Lincolnshire during
the next ten days, Wesley, on July 23, '• passed into York-
shire," and preached at Yeadon, Bradford, Halifax, Greetland,
Hudderstield, Longwood House, Mirficld, Daw Green, Birstal,
Tadcaster, York, Malton, Scarborough, Beverley, Hull, and
Pocklington ; and, at the beginning of August, arrived in
Leeds, for the purpose of holding his annual conference ; but,
before giving an account of its proceedings, two letters to
two ladies, both written on the same day, will be acceptable.
The first was to his niece. Miss Sarah Wesley, then a young
lady about twenty — afterwards a personal friend of a large
and distinguished literary circle, including Mrs. Hannah
More, Miss Porter, Miss Aikin, Miss Edgeworth, Mrs. Bar-
^ Wesley's Works, vol. xii., p. 138.
^ " History of Methodism in Grantham."
3 Wesley's Works, vol. xii., p. 475.
Wesley s Letter to his Niece, 357
bauld, and others, — and who died in 1828, at the age of 1781
sixty-eight, some of her last words being, " I have peace, but a^^s
not joy." ^
"Near Leeds, July 17, 1781.
" My dear Sally, — Without an endeavour to please God, and to give
up our own will, we never shall attain His favour. But till we have at-
tained it, till we have the Spirit of adoption, we cannot actually give up
our own wills to Him. Shall I tell you freely what I judge to be the grand
hindrance to your attaining it ? Yea, to your attaining more health both
of body and mind than you have ever had, or, at least, for a long season ?
I believe it is, what very few people are aware of, intemperance in sleep.
All are intemperate in sleep, who sleep more than nature requires ; and how
much it does require is easily known. There is, indeed, no universal rule,
— none that will suit all constitutions. But, after all the observations and
experience I have been able to make for upwards of fifty years, I am
fully persuaded that men, in general, need between six and seven hours-
sleep in twenty-four; and women, in general, a little more, — namely be-
tween seven and eight.
" But what ill consequences are there in lying longer in bed, — suppose
nine hours in four-and-twenty ?
" I. It hurts the body. Whether you sleep or no, (and, indeed, it com-
monly prevents sound sleep,) it, as it were, soddens and parboils the flesh,
and sows the seeds of numerous disorders ; of all nervous diseases in
particular, as weakness, faintness, lowness of spirits, nervous headaches,
and consequent weakness of sight.
" 2. It hurts the mind ; it weakens the understanding ; it blunts the
imagination ; it weakens the memory ; it dulls all the nobler affections.
It takes off the edge of the soul, impairs its vigour and firmness, and
infuses a wrong softness, quite inconsistent with the character of a good
soldier of Jesus Christ. It grieves the Holy Spirit of God, and prevents,
or, at least, lessens, those blessed influences which tend to make you, not
almost, but altogether, a Christian.
" I advise you, therefore, from this day forward, not trusting in yourself,
but in Him that raiseth the dead, to take exactly so much sleep as nature
requires. If you need between seven and eight hours, then, in the name
of God, begin this very night, in spite of all temptation to the contrarj'.
Lie down at ten o'clock, and rise between five and six, whether you sleep
or no. If your head aches in the day, bear it. In a week you will sleep
sound. If you can take this advice, you may receive more from,
" My dear Sally, yours most affectionately,
"John Wesley." 2
The other letter was addressed to Miss Bishop, who became
a Methodist about the year 1767, and who, from that time,
' Jackson's Life of C. Wesley ; and Methodist Magazine, 182S, p. 719.
2 Methodist Magazine, 1844, p. 288.
358 Life and Times of Wesley.
1 781 had been one of Wesley's correspondents. Many of his most
AgTjS spiritual letters were written to this Christian lady, who,
though poor, was a gentlewoman. For some years, she had
kept a school in Bath or its neighbourhood; but, in 1777, had
been seized with spitting of blood, and had been thrown upon
the kindness of her friends in Bristol.^ Recently, however,
she had comxmenced another school at Keynsham, which, said
Wesley, "is worthy to be called a Christian school;"^ though,
it would seem, some of the Bristol people wished to make it
more fashionable than Wesley liked.
"Near Leeds, July 17, 1781.
"My dear Sister, — If I live to meet the society in Bristol again, I
shall kill or cure the fault of those unwise and unkind parents, who make
their children finer than themselves. I shall make their ears tingle. As
to you, I advise you, first, to be a Bible Christian yourself, inwardly and
outwardly. Be not a hair's breadth more conformable to the fashions of
the world than you were when I saw you last. Then, train up your
children in the selfsame way. Say to them, with all rruldness and firmness,
* Be ye followers of me, even as I am of Christ.' Whoever is pleased or
displeased, keep to this; to Christian, primitive simplicity. Perhaps you
will at first lose some scholars thereby ; but regard it not : God will pro-
vide you more. And be assured, nothing shall be wanting that is in the
power of,
" My dear sister, your affectionate friend and brother,
"John Wesley." ^
Two or three other letters may be given here. The first is
copied from the original now before us, and, we believe, has
not before been published.
"Near Leeds, 7///r 25, 1781.
" My dear Brother,— As long as you give yourself up to God with-
out reserve, you may be assured He will give you His blessingi Indeed,
you have already received a thousand blessings ; but the greatest of all is
yet behind; — Christ in a sinless heart, reigning the Lord of every motion
there. It is good for you to hold fast what you have attained, and to be
continually aspiring after this. And you will never find more life in your
own soul than while you are earnestly exhorting others to go on to per-
fection. Many will blame you for doing it ; but regard not that. Go on,
through honour and dishonour. This one thing I do, is your motto; I
will save my own soiil and them that hear me.
" I am, your affectionate brother,
"J, Wesley."
* Manuscript letter by Miss March.
^ Wesley's Works, vol. iv., p. 207.
3 Methodist Magazitie, 1807, p. 471 ; and .Wesley's Works, vol. xiii., p. 36.
Wesley's Letter to Jiis Niece. 359
Wesley had told his niece, that, if she took his advice with 1781
respect to sleep, she might hear from him again. It seems, AeTyS
the advice was adopted; hence the following letter, written
seven weeks after the former one.
" Bristol, September 4, 17S1.
"My dear Sally, — It is certain the Author of our nature designed
that we should not destroy, but regulate, our desire for knowledge. What
course you may take in order to this, I will now briefly point out.
" I. You want to know God, in order to enjoy Him in time and eternity.
" 2. All you want to know of Him is contained in one book, the
Bible. And all that you learn is to be referred to this, either directly
or remotely.
"3. Would it not be well, then, to spend, at least, an hour a day in
reading and meditating on the Bible ? reading, every morning and even-
ing, a portion of the Old and New Testament, with the Explanatory
Notes ?
" 4. Might you not read two or three hours in the morning, and one or
two in the afternoon ? When you are tired of severer studies, you may
relax your mind by history or poetry.
" 5. The first thing you should understand a little of is grammar. You
may read first Kingswood English Grammar, and then Bishop Lovvth's
Introduction.
" 6. You should acquire, if you have not already, some knowledge of
arithmetic. Dilworth's Arithmetic would suffice.
" 7. For geography, I think you need only read over Randal's or
Guthrie's Geographical Grammar.
" 8. Watts' Logic is not a very good one ; but I believe you cannot find
a better.
"9. In natural philosophy, you have all that you need to know in the
' Survey of the Wisdom of God in Creation.' But you may add the
Glasgow abridgment of Mr. Hutchinson's works.
" 10, With any, or all, of the foregoing studies, you may intermix that
of history. You may begin with Rollin's Ancient History; and after-
wards read, in order, the Concise History of the Church, Burnet's History
of the Reformation, the Concise History of England, Clarendon's History
of the Rebellion, Neal's History of the Puritans, his History of New
England, and Robertson's History of America.
"11. In metaphysics, you may read Locke's Essay on the Human
Understanding, and ]\Ialebranche's Search after Truth.
" 12. For poetry, you may read Spenser's Fairy Queen, and select parts
of Shakspeare, Fairfax, or Hoole ; Godfrey of Bouillon, Paradise Lost, the
Night Thoughts, and Young's Moral and Sacred Poems.
" 13. You may begin and end with divinity ; in which I will only add, to
the books mentioned before, Bishop Pearson on the Creed, and the
Christian Library. By this course of study, you may gain all the know-
ledge which any reasonable Christian needs. But remember, before all,
360 J^ifi. ci^d Times of Wesley.
I 781 in all, and above all, your great point is, to know the only true God, and
, o Jesus Christ whom He hath sent.
Age 70
" I am, my dear Sally, your affectionate uncle,
"John Wesley." ^
Though ]\Iiss Wesley was now hi her twenty-first year, and
had yet to begin Ivingswood EngHsh Grammar, still, assum-
ing that henceforward she acted upon the advice of her
venerable uncle, it is not surprising, that she ultimately
became the well informed woman which her father's biogra-
pher says she was. Her brother Charles was three years
older than herself; her brother Samuel six years younger.
The brothers were musical prodigies ; their uncle took a
deep interest in their welfare ; and wrote to Charles, on
August 4, and September 8, 178 1, as follows.
" My dear Charles,— There is a debt of love, which I should have
paid before now ; but I must not delay it any longer. I have long ob-
served you with a curious eye ; not as a musician, but as an immortal
spirit, that is come forth frorri God the Father of spirits, and is returning
to Him in a few moments. But have you well considered this? Me-
thinks, if you had, it would be ever uppermost in your thoughts. For
what trifles, in comparison of this, are all the shining baubles in the world !
God has favoured you with many advantages. You have health, strength,
and a thousand outward blessings. And why should you not have all
inward blessings, which God hath purchased for those that love Him ?
You are good humoured, mild, and harmless ; but, unless you are born
again, you cannot see the kingdom of God ! You are now, as it were, on
the crisis of your fate ; just launching into life, and ready to fix your
choice, whether you will have God.or.the world for your happiness. You
cannot avoid being very frequently among elegant men and women, that
are without God in the world ; but, as your business, rather than your
choice, czA'i you into the fire, I trust that you will not be burnt ; seeing
He, whom you desire to serve, is able to deliver you, even out of the
burning fiery furnace.
" I am, dear Charles, your very affectionate uncle,
"John Wesley." 2
Charles Wesley, junior, Avho had been already introduced to
the court of George III., lived to become the organist of George
IV., and the musical preceptor of the long lamented Princess
Charlotte. He never married ; but resided, first with his
widowed mother, and then with his sister Sarah, — was a man
' Methodist Magazine, 1846, p. 452. 2 i^icj^ 1844, p. 562.
Wesley s NepJiews, Charles and Samuel. 361
of deep devotional feeling, an attendant at Methodist chapels, 1781
a lover of Methodist preachers, and died, in 1834, humming A"e~78
Handel's music, and was buried in the same grave as his
father and mother in Marylebone churchyard. Poor Samuel
was seduced into the popish church before he arrived at the
age of twenty ; and, thereby, brought the grey hairs of his
father with sorrow to the grave. He composed a high mass
for the use of the chapel of Pope Pius VI., and received that
pontiff's thanks.^ Like many others, he found it an easy
step from popery to infidelity, and wrote : " In this life, my
only consolation is in the belief of fatalism, which, although
a gloomy asylum, is as bright as I can bear, till convinced of
that truth which a launch into the great gulf only can de-
monstrate." He survived his brother Charles and his sister
Sarah ; in his last days became a penitent ; died in 1837 ; and
was buried in the sepulchre of his parents.^
The conference of 1781 was a memorable gathering. It
was preceded, on Sunday, August 5, by a service in the
parish church, at Leeds, such as was probably never witnessed
within its walls, either before or since. Wesley preached ;
eighteen clergymen, inclusive of himself. Coke, and Fletcher,
w^ere present ; and, at the Lord's supper, there were about
eleven hundred communicants, the ordinance being admi-
nistered by Wesley and ten other ministers.^
Connexional affairs created anxiety. Thomas Taylor, in his
manuscript diary, remarks : " I feel much concern respecting
several things ; but how to have them remedied I cannot tell.
Many things are exceedingly wrong ; but whom to trust to
attempt amendment I know not. I sometimes think, the
whole head is sick, and the whole heart faint."
Wesley writes : " August 6 — I desired Mr. Fletcher, Dr.
Coke, and four more of our brethren, to meet every evening,
that we might consult together on any difficulty that occurred.
On August 7, our conference began, at which were present
about seventy preachers, whom I had severally invited to
come and assist me with their advice, in carrying on the great
work of God."
^ Life of C. Wesley, vol. ii., p. 316. ' Wesley Banner, 185 1.
3 Methodist Magazine, 1829, p. 528.
362 Lif^ ci'iid Times of Wesley,
1 78 1 The burden of so many preachers behig present was found
K^i% to be greater than the Leeds society could conveniently bear ;
and it was agreed that every preacher should pay the expenses
of his horse keep during the conference sittings. There were
more preachers' wives in the connexion than there were houses
to lodge them, or money to find them maintenance; and it was
resolved, that no more married preachers should be admitted,
except in cases of necessity.' Some of the preachers had
printed, both in verse and prose, without Wesley's consent or
correction. Among others, James Kershaw had recently
issued a quarto sized book, of 134 pages, entitled, "The
Methodist ; attempted in Plain Metre." It was thought,
that these productions had brought a reproach upon the
Methodists, and had hindered the spreading of more profitable
books ; and it was determined that, in future, no preacher
should print anything till it had been corrected by Wesley,
and that the profits thereof should go into the common stock.
Wesley's Notes on the Old Testament had now been pub-
lished sixteen years, and yet the edition had not been sold.
To get rid of the remaining copies, it was directed that they
should be sold at half price.
A number of Methodists at Baildon, in Yorkshire, had
written to Wesley, stating that, in accordance with his instruc-
tions, they attended the services of their parish church ;
but their minister preached what they considered to be " dan-
gerously false doctrine," inasnmch as he publicly declared,
that men " must not hope to be perfected in love, on this side
eternity " ; and this had made them doubt whether they
' The following letter Avas written to Duncan Wright, assistant in
Yarm circuit, a few months later.
" London, November 24, 1781.
"Dear Duncan, — Surely you and I may speak freely to each other ;
for we love one another. If George Holder goes out, either you must
keep his mother, or she must go to the workhouse. You must not give an
exhortation to the bands, but encourage them to speak. I would be much
obliged to you if you would (i) accept the key of the book room, and
immediately take the books into your own care ; (2) clip the wings of the
local preachers, stewards, and leaders, changing them as need requires ;
(3) fix bands where they are wanting; (4) if James Bogie is willing to
remain single, let him travel ; (5) do not receive the blind mah hastily,
let him be thoroughly tried first ; (6) be of good courage, and conquer
everything. I am, dear Duncan, etc., John Wesley." —( JFrt/r/zz/mw,
Jan. 8, 1868.)
Conference 0/ lySi. 36
o
ought to hear him. Wesley laid their letter before the con- ^"^
ference, and, as the difficulty applied to many others besides Age 78
the Methodists at Baildon, he invited a friendly and free
discussion. It was unanimously agreed: (i) That it was
highly expedient, that all the Methodists, who had been bred
therein, should attend the service of the church as often as
possible. But that, (2) If the minister began either to preach
the absolute decrees, or to rail at, and ridicule Christian
perfection, they should quietly go out of the church ; yet
attend it again the next opportunity." Wesley adds : " I
have, since that time, revolved this matter over and over in
my mind ; and the more I consider it, the more I am con-
vinced, this was the best answer that could be given. Only, I
must earnestly caution our friends not to be critical ; not to
make a man an offender for a word ; no, nor for a few sen-
tences, which any who believe the decrees may drop without
design." ^ " It is a delicate and important point, on which I
cannot lay down any general rule. All I can say, at present,
is, if it does not hurt you, hear them ; if it does, refrain. Be
determined by your own conscience." ^
But this was not all that occurred, on the Church question,
at the conference of 1781. One of the principal Methodists,
in Leeds, was William Hey, now in the forty-fifth year of his
age, a medical man of great repute, an intimate friend and
correspondent of Dr. Priestley, and who had been a Methodist
for seven-and-tvventy years. Mr. Hey intimated to Wesley
his desire to address the conference, and to offer some sugges-
tions and advice ; declaring, at the same time, that, if his pro-
posals were rejected, he could no longer remain a member of
the Methodist society. By Wesley's permission he began to
read a paper, to the effect, that Dissenting ideas had been, for
many years, gradually growing among the Methodists. In
proof of this, he held that the Methodists preached in places
already supplied with pious ministers ; that meetings in some
instances were held in church hours ; that the intervals of
church service were so filled up with public and private as-
semblies, that there was no time for suitable refreshment, nor
1 Methodist Magazine, 1782, p. 153. .
^Wesley's Works, vol. xiii., p. 232.
o
64 Life and Times of Wesley.
'781 opportunity for instructing families ; that many of the largest
Age"78 societies rarely went to church, and some never carried their
children there; and that church ministers, who formed societies
for private instruction, were looked upon with an envious eye.
Such were the complaints which Mr. Hey intended to lay
before the conference ; but, as he proceeded, the marks of dis-
approbation were such that Wesley interposed, and said : "As
there is much other business before us, brother Hey must
defer reading the remainder of his paper to another time,"
Brother Hey forthwith left the society ; a few months later
he was elected alderman ; and, more than once, filled the
oftice of chief magistrate in the town of Leeds. Of his ability
and piety there can be no question ; but Wesley was not pre-
pared to allow him to be the dictator of the Methodists.^
No sooner Avas the conference over than the venerable
Wesley again set out on his gospel wanderings. He preached
at Sheffield, and then, taking coach with Dr. Coke, travelled
day and night till he arrived in London. Two days were
spent in the metropolis, and then off he set, on Sunday night,
August 19, by coach to Cornwall. We need not follow him.
Suffice it to say, that, in eight days, he preached in Cornwall,
at least, thirteen sermons, five of them in the open air, and
one in Gwcnnap Pit, to a congregation computed at more
than twenty thousand people.
On September 6, he got back to Bristol, in the neighbour-
hood of which, according to his custom, he spent a month.
While here, he wrote the following characteristic letter to
Mr. Elijah Bush, a young schoolmaster at Midsomer Norton,
who wished to marry a lady to whom his father and mother
objected.
"COLEFORD, September 11, 1781.
"My dear Brother, — I was much concerned yesterday, when I
heard you were hkely to marry a woman against the consent of your
parents. I have never, in an observation of fifty years, known such a
marriage attended with a blessing. I know not how it should be, since it
is flatly contrary to the fifth commandment. I told my own mother,
pressing me to marry, 'I dare not allow you a positive voice herein ; I dare
not marry a person because you bid me. But I must allow you a negative
voice : I will marry no person if you forbid. I know it would be a sin
* Life of Hey.
Age 7S
Death of Wesley's Wife. 365
against God.' Take care what you do. Mr. S. is not a proper judge : he 17S1
hopes to separate you from the Methodists ; and I expect, if you take
this step, that will be the end.
" I am, your affectionate brother,
"John Wesley." >
Mr. Bush acted upon Wesley's advice ; became the leader
of the Midsomer Norton society, and a local preacher; and
died a faithful Methodist in 1845.^
There are other unhappy marriages besides those contrary
to the fifth commandment. Wesley's was one. For thirty
years, he paid a fearful penalty for his rash act in 175 i ; but
now his matrimonial misery ended. Leaving Bristol on
October 7, and preaching on his way at Devizes, Sarum,
Winchester, and in the Isle of Wight, he arrived in London
on October 12, and, under the same date, wrote in his journal:
" I was informed my wife died on Monday." (October 8.)
" This evening she was buried, though I was not informed of
it till a day or two after."
Mourning for such a wife would have been hypocrisy.
Three days after, on October 15, the widower set out to visit
his societies in Oxfordshire. On a similar errand, he went off
to Norfolk. On November 5, he began meeting the London
classes, and says : " I found a considerable increase in the
society. This I impute chiefly to a small company of young
persons, who have kept a prayer-meeting at five every
morning." He then set out on his tours through North-
amptonshire, Huntingdonshire, Bedfordshire, Sussex, and
Kent, and concluded the year in London.
The war still raged ; English disasters were multiplied ; the
ministry was tottering, and soon after fell ; with which fall the
conflict in America concluded. It was at this period, that a
rumour gained credence, that the administration intended to
propose the embodying of the militia, and their being exer-
cised on Sundays. Wesley was an ardent friend of the minis-
try of Lord North ; and, of course, a staunch defender of the
sanctity of the sabbath. Accordingly, towards the close of
178 1, he addressed the following letter to a nobleman, then
high in office.
' Methodist Magazine, 1848, p. 1055. " Iljid.
366 Life and Times of Wesley.
I 781 "AIy Lord, — If I wrong your lordship, I am sorry for it; but I really
~ believe your lordship fears God: and I hope your lordship has no un-
" favourable opinion of the Christian revelation. This encourages me to
trouble your lordship with a few lines, which otherwise I should not take
upon me to do.
"Above thirty years ago, a motion was made in parliament for raising
and embodying the mihtia, and for exercising them, to save time, on
Sunday. When the motion was like to pass, an old gentleman stood up
and said: 'Mr. Speaker, I have one objection to this: I believe an old
book, called the Bible.' The members looked at one another, and the
motion was dropped.
"Must not all others, who believe the Bible, have the very same ob-
jection ? And from what I have seen, I cannot but think, these are still
three fourths of the nation. Now, setting religion out of the question, is
it expedient to give such a shock to so many millions of people at once ?
And certainly it would shock them extremely ; it would wound them in a
very tender part. For would not they, would not all England, would not
all Europe, consider this as a virtual repeal of the Bible ? And would
not all serious persons say, ' We have little religion in the land now ; but,
by this step, we shall have less still. For wherever this pretty show is
to be seen, the people will flock together; and will lounge away so much
time before and after it, that the churches will be emptier than they are
at present!'
" My lord, I am concerned for this on a double account. First,
because I have personal obligations to your lordship, and would fain,
even for this reason, recommend your lordship to the love and esteem of
all over whom I have any influence. Secondly, because I now reverence
your lordship for your office sake, and believe it to be my bounden duty
to do all, that is in my little power, to advance your lordship's influence
and reputation.
" Will your lordship permit me to add a word in my old fashioned way .?
I pray Him, that has all power in heaven and earth, to prosper all your
endeavours for the public good ; and am, my lord, your lordship's willing
servant,
"John Wesley." '
For some reason, no such bill was introduced into
parliament. A few months later, Lord North and his
colleagues tendered to the king their resignation, and peace
negotiations were commenced.
Before concluding the present year, it only remains to
notice Wesley's publications in 1781.
I. " An Extract of a Letter to the Right Honourable Lord
* Whitehead's Life of Wesley, vol. ii., p. 400.
Wesley s Ptiblications, in I'jZi. 367
Viscount H c, on his Naval Conduct in the American 1781
War." i2mo, 27 pages. A^yS
2. "A Concise Ecclesiastical History, from the Birth of
Christ to the Beginning of the present Century. In four
volumes." i2mo. The proposals for printing this work by
subscription are now before us ; from which it appears, that
the price of the four volumes, to subscribers, was ten shillings,
and that booksellers, subscribing for six copies, should have
a seventh gratis. The book, in fact, is Wesley's abridgment
of Mosheim, to which is added, " A Short History of the
People called Methodists," filling ii2 printed pages, and
dated "London, November 16, 1781."
3. The Arminian Magazine. 8vo, 6%"^ pages. In his
preface, Wesley says : " I dare not fill up any publication of
mine with bits and scraps, to humour any one living. It is
true, I am not fond of verbose writers, neither of very long
treatises. I conceive, the size of a book is not always the
measure of the WTiter's understanding. Nay, I believe, if
angels were to write books, we should have very few folios.
But, neither am I fond of tracts, that begin and end before
they have cleared up anything."
Besides six original sermons, the principal article in the
magazine of 1781 is Wesley's own translation of Castellio's
Dialogues on Predestination. There is a long and inter-
esting account of Kingswood school. Wesley writes : — " I
love the very sight of Oxford ; but my prejudice in its
favour is considerably abated : I do not admire it as I once
did; and, whether I did or not, I am now constrained to make
a virtue of necessity." He then refers to the expulsion, and
exclusion of students, because of their being Methodists; and
continues : " I am much obliged to Dr. Nowell and others,
for not holding me longer in suspense, but dealing so frankly
and openly. And, blessed be God! I can do all the business,
which I have in hand, without them. Honour or preferment
I do not want, any more than a feather in my cap ; and I
trustj most of those who are educated at our school are, and
will be, of the same mind. As to the knowledge of the
tongues, and of arts and sciences, with whatever is termed
academical learning, if those who have a tolerable capacity for
them do not advance more at Kingswood in three years,
368 Life and Times of Wesley.
i^i than the generality of students at Oxford and Cambridge do
Age 78 in seven, I will bear the blame for ever." He then meets
the objection, that young men could not have at Kingswood
the advantages they would have at the university, from
professors, tutors, public exercises, and company. He main-
tains, that it would be no loss to the universities if all their
professorships were abolished. Some of the tutors, he
admits, were worthy of all honour, but many were utterly
unqualified for the work they had undertaken. As to the
public exercises, he himself had never " found them any
other than useless interruptions of useful studies." As to
company, he writes : *' It is most true, that the moment a
young man sets his foot either in Oxford or Cambridge,
he is surrounded with company of all kinds, except that
which will do him good ; with loungers and triflers of every
sort ; with men who no more concern themselves with learning
than with religion. Company, therefore, is usually so far from
being an advantage to those who enter at either university,
that it is the grand nuisance, as well as disgrace, of both ;
the pit that swallows unwary youths by thousands. I bless
God! we have no such choice of company at Kingsivood ; nor
ever will, till my head is laid. There is no trifler, no lounger,
no drone there ; much less any drunkard, sabbath breaker,
or common swearer. Whoever accounts this a disadvantage
may find a remedy at any college in Oxford or Cambridge."
1782.
As usual, Wesley spent the first two months of the new 1782
year in London. The most notable occurrence, during Age 79
this period, was the institution of a tract society, — the first
that was ever formed. The Religious Tract Society was
originated in 1799; Wesley's, seventeen years previous to this.
We have before us an original document printed in 1783,
entitled, "A Plan of the Society, instituted in January, 1782,
to distribute Religious Tracts among the Poor." The rules
are three. " i. Every member must subscribe half-a-guinea,
a guinea, or more, annually. 2. A proportionable quota of
tracts shall be delivered yearly to each subscriber, according
to his subscription, and, as nearly as possible, at prime cost,
and carriage paid. 3. Every subscriber shall have a right to
choose his own tracts, if he please ; otherwise, he will receive
a proportionable variety of the whole." After this follows a
list of thirty tracts already printed, all of them either written
or published by Wesley. Then there is subjoined the follow-
ing : " An Extract of the Original Proposals."
" I cannot but earnestly recommend this to all those who desire to see
true scriptural Christianity spread throughout these nations. Men wholly
unawakened will not take pains to read the Bible. They have no relish
for it. But a small tract may engage their attention for half-an-hour ;
and may, by the blessing of God, prepare them for going forwai'd.
"John Weslev.
"London, yanuaiy 25, 1782."
Though Wesley's tract society does not now exist, in tlie
form in which it was instituted in 1782, it is a fact worth
noting, that, in 1867, Wesley's book room, in City Road, sold
not fewer than one million five hundred and seventy thousand
tracts, all printed and published by itself;' and that the
number of its distinct and separate tract publications, in 1871,
is not less than 1250.
^ Methodist Recorder, Aug. 16, 1867.
VOL. in. B B
370 Life and Times of Wesley.
1782 We have said, the Methodist Tract Society was the first
Age 79 that was ever formed. It is true that, in 1699, " The Society
for Promoting Christian Knowledge " was founded ; and, in
1750, " The Society for Promoting Rehgious Knowledge
among the Poor " ; but, strictly speaking, neither of these was
a tract society. In this respect, as in others, Wesley was a
pioneer. As early as 1745, he speaks of " giving away some
thousands of little tracts among the common people"; and
long before 1782, had written, and published, besides a large
number of separate and short sermons, at least scores of
penny publications. And ytt Mr. Jones, the correspond-
ing secretary of the Religious Tract Society, in his jubilee
volume of 700 pages, while professing to trace the origin of
tract distribution, entirely omits the name of Wesley, who
saw the value and the power of a tract more than fifty years
before the Religious Tract Society had a name. Was this
intentional .'' We trust not.
On Sunday, the 3rd of March, Wesley took coach for
Bristol, where he spent the next fortnight. He then started
off on his long northern journey. On his way, he called at
Madeley, where " both Mr. and Mrs. Fletcher complained,
that, after all the pains they had taken, they could not prevail
on the people to join in society, no, nor even to meet in class."
What the vicar and his new wife (Miss Bosanquet) failed to
do, Wesley accomplished. He preached two rousing sermons;
and " then desired those, who were willing to join together for
Christian fellowship, to call upon him and Mr. Fletcher after
service. Ninety-four persons did so : about as many men as
women." Wesley adds : " We explained to them the nature
of a Christian society, and they willingly joined therein."
Wesley then proceeded to Congleton, where "the Calvinists
were striving to make havoc of the flock " ; and to Maccles-
field, where he spent Good Friday and Easter Sunday. On
the former day, he preached twice, in the Rev. David Simp-
son's church ; and, with his assistance, administered the
sacrament to about thirteen himdred persons ; on the latter
day, he also preached twice in the same edifice ; again
administered to eight hundred communicants ; and, in the
evening, preached in the Methodist chapel, and held a love-
feast at which sixteen or eighteen persons professed to live in
Love/east, at Alacclesfidd. 371
the enjoyment of the blessing of perfect love. "About forty," 1782
says Hester Ann Rogers, in the unpublished portion of her AgTyo
diary, " made a noble confession." Among these were herself,
George Bradock, Joseph Roe, John Booby, T. Ridgway,
Joseph Norberry, Billy Sharpley, S. Bradshaw, and John
Goostry ; the last of whom Wesley ordered to stand on the
form, that the people might hear him. " Mr. Wesley," con-
tinues Mrs. Rogers, "kept the lovefeast two hours, a thing
which I nev^er knew him do before ; but his soul was filled
with tiiankfulness, for so many witnesses of redeeming love
and full salvation."
It would be tedious to mention all the places Wesley
visited. Suffice it to say, that, at Ashton under Lyne, he
preached in the new chapel, which had the following inscrip-
tion over the door : " Can any good come out of Nazareth .''
Come and see ! " At Oldham, " a whole troop of boys and
girls w^ould not be contented till he shook each by the hand."
At St. Helen's, he preached in the house of Joseph Harris,
who had removed from Kingswood, "to take care of the
copper works." At Wigan, he " saw an uncommon sight, —
the preaching house filled, yea, crowded." At Epworth,
there had been a marvellous revival. At Thorne, fifty had
found peace with God within two months. At Edinburgh, he
was the guest of Lady Maxwell, and visited her school of
forty poor children, many of w'hom were without shoes ; but
not a girl, in rags, was without her ruffles. At Kelso, he fell,
head foremost, down the stairs of Dr. Douglas's house, but
mercifully escaped without serious injury.^ At York, he
entered into his eightieth year, and wrote : " Blessed be God 1
my time is not labour and sorrow. I find no more pain or
bodily infirmities than at five-and-twenty. This I still im-
pute— (1) To the power of God, fitting me for what He calls
me to. (2) To my still travelling four or five thousand miles
a year. (3) To my sleeping, night or day, whenever I want
' It was doubtless at this time that he had a youthful hearer, who after-
wards became the renowned Sir Walter Scott. In a letter to Southey,
dated Abbotsford, April 4, 1819, Scott writes: "When I was about
twelve years old, I heard Wesley preach more than once, standing on a
chair, in Kelso churchyard. He was a most venerable figure, but his
sermons were vastly too colloquial for the taste of Saunders. He told
2,^2 . Life and Times of Wesley.
1782 it. (4) To my rising at a set hour. (5) To my constant
Age^9 preaching, particularly in the morning."
Wesley reached London, after an absence of more than
four months, on July 20. Here he held his conference.
He writes : " Friday, August 2, we observed as a day of
fasting and prayer for a blessing on the ensuing con-
ference ; and I believe God clothed His word with power
in an uncommon manner throughout the week ; so that,
were it only on this account, the preachers who came from
all parts found their labour was not in vain."
Among other questions debated at this conference, was the
sabbath. Methodists, in some instances, visited barbers'
shops on Sundays ; and, in others, practised military exer-
cises, as volunteers, or were spectators of such exercises. This
led the conference to enact, that no members of society should
have their hair dressed on Sundays ; and that, as far as
possible, those barbers should be patronised who observed the
sabbath's sanctity. It was further determined, that any
Methodist, who practised military exercises on the sabbath,
as a volunteer, should be expelled ; and that any one who,
after proper admonition, continued a spectator of such
sabbath drills should undergo the same penalty. Though
not absolutely forbidden, preachers were recommended not to
powder their hair, nor to wear artificial curls. The weekly
and quarterly contributions having been shamefully neglected
in many of the societies, the assistants and leaders were to
remind the people of the original rule, that " every member
contributes one penny weekly, (unless he is in extreme
poverty,) and one shilling quarterly." Wesley adds: ^' Money
lovers are the pest of every Christian society. They have
been the main cause of destroying every revival of religion.
They will destroy us, if we do not put them away. A man
many excellent stories. One I remember, which he said had happened
to him at Edinburgh. 'A drunken dragoon,' said Wesley, ' was com-
mencing an assertion in military fashion, G— d eternally d n me,
just as I was passing. I touched the poor man on the shoulder, and
when he turned round fiercely, said calmly, You mean, Cod bless you.' In
the mode of telling the story, he failed not to make us sensible how much
this patriarchal appearance, and mild yet bold rebuke, overawed the
soldier, who touched his hat, thanked him, and, I think, came to chapel
that evening." — ("Memoirs of Sir Walter Scott," by J. G. Lockhart, Esq.)
Birstal Chapd Case. 373
not worth a shilling enters our society. Yet he freely gives a 1782
penny a week. Five years after, he is worth scores of pounds; t^na
he gives a penny a week still. I must think this man covet-
ous, unless he assures me he bestows his charity some other
way. For every one is covetous, whose beneficence does not
increase in the same proportion as his substance."
The most troublesome subject of discussion was the case
of the Birstal chapel. It was asked, "What can be done with
regard to the preaching house at Birstal.'" Answer. "If
the trustees still refuse to settle it on the Methodist plan : I.
Let a plain statement of the case be drawn up. 2. Let a
collection be made throughout all England, in order to
purchase ground, and to build another preaching house as near
the present as may be."
This was an important matter, on account of its involving
one of Methodism's fundamental principles, namely, that the
conference alone shall have the power of appointing preachers
to preach in Methodist chapels. This was the first time that
the question was fairly raised. It was seen, that the issue,
either way, would be most momentous. It affected not
Birstal merely, but the whole Methodist connexion ; and not
the present only, but the future. Great excitement was
created. The controversy, among other great results, led to
the drawing up and enrolment of Methodism's Magna Charta,
Wesley's deed of declaration, in 1784. Altogether, this was
one of the most important events in Wesley's history ; and,
hence, a detailed account of it will not be inappropriate.
The original chapel at Birstal was erected, under the aus-
pices of John Nelson, about the year 175 i. By the deed of
settlement, the right of occupying the pulpit was given, first,
to the two Wesleys in succession, and then to Grimshaw
of Haworth; but, after the decease of these three ministers,
the trustees were to elect their own preachers monthly ;
and all such preachers, so long as they continued in this
office, were to preach in the chapel twice every Sunday, every
Christmas day, New Year's day, and Good Friday, and
also every Thursday night, as had been, up to 175 i, "usual
and customary to be done."
Such was the substance of the obnoxious clause; which
hitherto, however, had created no difficulty.
374 Life and Times of Wesley.
o
1782 In 1782, it was found necessary, either to enlarge the old
Age 79 chapel, or to build a new one in its place. Contributions were
given for this purpose ; but were not sufficient. It was ascer-
• tained, that the sum of ;£^350 additional would be required,
and that eight of the intended trustees would have to advance
the money. To give them security, a deed of transfer was
prepared, in which John and Charles Wesley, for the con-
siderations therein mentioned, sold to certain specified
trustees the old premises, with the following agreements in
reference to the enlarged, or the new chapel, which was to be
provided to meet the growing necessities of the Birstal
Methodists, i. The trustees advancing the £z^0 were to
have, as their security, " the rents and profits to arise from
the hearers' pews and seats." 2. The new or enlarged chapel
was to be occupied, during their lifetime, by John and Charles
Wesley, or by those whom they might from time to time
appoint. 3. After their death, the appointment of preachers,
to preach in the said chapel, Avas to be made by the trustees,
and by " such members of the Methodist society as had
been classleaders for three years, within the circumjacent
villages of Birstal, Great Gomersal, Little Gomersal, Birken-
shaw, Adwalton, Drighlington, Batley, Carlinghow, and
Heckmondwike ; or by the major part of such trustees and
classleaders." Provided always, that the said preachers preach
no other doctrine than is contained in Mr. Wesley's Notes
upon the Old and New Testament ; that they preach in the
said chapel twice every Sunday, and at least one evening
every week ; and that they hold the said premises and exer-
cise the function of a preacher only during the goodwill and
pleasure of the major part of the aforesaid trustees and class-
leaders. After this, followed a number of provisoes in refer-
ence to pew rents, etc, (i) The rents were to be applied in
keeping the premises in repair. (2) In paying interest upon
the debt of ;^350, at 5 per cent, per annum. (3) In maintain-
ing the preacher for the time being, for which purpose, how-
ever, not more than ;^I0 a year should be appropriated, until
after the whole of the ;^350 had been repaid; when, after
deducting for repairs and lasting improvements, the whole of
the clear rents and profits arising from the pews and seats
should be given "for and towards the maintenance and sup-
Birstal Chapel Case. 375
port of the preachers or pastors for the time being of the said 1782
society at Birstal." It was further provided, that the appoint- Age~79
ment and removal of chapel stewards should be vested in the
preachers, trustees, and classleaders aforesaid, or the major
part of them, notice of their meetings for such purpose, how-
ev^er, having to be publicly read to the congregation on three
successive Sunday evenings immediately preceding. Certain
rooms also in a dwelling house, on the premises, were to be at
the use of the stewards and leaders, for the purpose of trans-
acting business and meeting classes.
The above is an abstract of all the important points in the
new trust deed of 1782. That deed had attached to it the
following signatures.
John Aspinall, William Booth,
Joseph Bennett, John Wesley,
James Blackburn, Joseph Charlesworth,
John Tempest, Charles Gunson,
Jonathan Brearley, John Armitage,
Benjamin Mallinson, Joseph Lee,
Anthony Williamson, Thomas Crowther,
Nathaniel Harrison, WiUiam Tempest,
John White, Isaac Smith,
Joseph Nelson, William Chadvvick.
Wesley's signature was witnessed by Thomas Briscoe and
Alexander Mather. The deed was dated May 14, 1782, and
was enrolled on the nth of October following. It may be
added, that, of the above signers, Aspinall, Bennett, Black-
burn, Tempest, Brierley, Williamson, Harrison, White, Nelson,
and Booth were old trustees ; Mallinson, Charlesworth, Gun-
son, Armitage, Lee, Crowther, W. Tempest, Smith, and
Chadwick were the new trustees.
The deed of 1782 was widely different from that of 175 1,
and, as the vice chancellor ruled in 1854, so far as it pur-
ported to vary the trusts of the latter deed, it was void and
of no effect;' but it still contained the obnoxious clause,
giving power to other parties than Wesley's conference, to
appoint the preachers. Wesley says, in a letter to his brother,
dated May 28, 1782:
Methodist Magazine^ 1854, p. 184.
^']6 Life and Times of Wesley.
1782 " The trustees brought to me the deed, at Daw Green, Avhich they read
over, and desired me to sign. We disputed upon it about an hour. I
^^ 7^ then gave them a positive answer, that I would not sign it ; and, leaving
them abruptly, went up into my room. At night, a little before I went to
bed, they came again, got round and worried me down. But, I think, they
cannot worry you. May you not very properly write to Mr. Valton ? ' If
the trustees will settle the Birstal house on the Methodist plan, I will sign
their deed with all my heart ; but, if they build a house for a presbyterian
meeting-house, I will not, dare not, have anything to do with it.'"^
Wesley committed a mistake ; but, be it borne in mind,
that he was now an old man of nearly eighty, and that
Alexander Mather, and Thomas Briscoe, the superintendents
of the Leeds and Birstal circuits, were participators in his
folly.
In an unpublished letter to Samuel Bradburn, then sta-
tioned at Bradford, Wesley wrote :
" London, November 9, 1 782.
"Dear Sammy, — T abhor the thought of giving to twenty men the
power to place or displace the preacher in their congregations. How
would he then dare to speak an unpleasing truth ? And, if he did, what
would become of him ? This must never be the case, while I live,
among the Methodists. And Birstal is a leading case, the first of an
avowed violation of our plan. Therefore, the point must be carried for
the Methodist preachers now or never ; and I alone can carry it, which
I will, God being my helper. You are not a match for the silver tongue,
nor brother Hopper. But do not, to please any of your new friends
forsake
"Your true old friend,
"John Wesley."
Charles Wesley acted upon his brother's advice. He
entered into correspondence with the Birstal reformers. In
answer to their objection, that "the present trustees coiild not
legally transfer any of their power to the conference," he asks :
"Then how can they transfer any of their power to the
leaders }" He continues :
"You add, — 'As long as the conference appoints preachers with candid
impartiality, we doubt not their appointments will be acquiesced in by the
trustees and classleaders.' But, according to this deed, the conference
has no more business than the parliament to appoint preachers at all. To
touch on one more point. From the beginning of Methodism till now, the
assistants appointed the stewards in all societies ; but this deed gives the
^Wesley's Works, vol. xii., p. 13S.
Dii^stal Chapel Case. 2)17
trustees and leaders this power; which they think is '■necessary to ensure 1782
the repayment of the ^{^350 to be advanced for the building.' Necessary ! .
Not at all. How many thousand pounds, advanced for buildings, have
been paid within these forty years, though all the stewards in England,
Scotland, and Ireland, have been hitherto appointed by my brother or the
assistants! You conclude your letter with a very just observation: 'the
civil and religious rights of mankind have seldom been promoted by the
assemblies of ecclesiastics of any denomination ; and they never will be,
unless they are composed of men devoted to God, and dead to all the
allurements of ease, and avarice, and ambition.' This is undoubtedly
true ; and this, we humbly hope, is the real character of most (at least) of
those persons that meet in our assemblies. We hope, likewise, that ' their
consultations will always be moderated by some wise and truly religious
man'; otherwise, that God will sweep away the very name of Methodist
.from the earth. Upon the whole, I cannot, I dare not sign that deed. I
can have nothing to do with it. If the house should, nevertheless, he
built, and settled upon that plan, I apprehend the consequence would be
this: I. No Methodist preacher would ever preach in it. Ifanydid, the
whole body would disclaim him. 2. My brother would immediately set a
subscription on foot for buying ground and building another house. The
trustees then might do what they pleased with theirs."'
This letter was written a week before the conference of
1782 was opened; and was a reply to one written by James
Carr, the trustees' attorney, who, soon afterwards, addressed
the following unpublished letter to Mr. Charlesworth.
" My good Friend, — Having an insuperable aversion to recite my own
simple performances, I here enclose a correct copy of my letter to Mr.
Charles Wesley.
" I know, that you and the other framers of the present trust deed,
were actuated by the purest, most equitable, and disinterested motives ;
and, therefore, in my address to Mr. Wesley, I held myself bound, by
every tie of justice, to explain and enforce \}[\t grounds diXxdi reasons of your
conduct, with all the energy in my power. I hope, I have no immodest
opinion of my poor abilities, when I assert, that the reasons, by me
alleged, for modifying the deed, in the manner described, cannot be
fairly answered or refuted, by Mr. Mather, or Mr. C. Wesley. Ingenuity
may perplex, wit may ridicule, sophistry may misinterpret, or prejudice
may dislike a deed framed contrary to received systems or opinions. But
when it is calmly considered, that the poor, beneficent founders of the
preaching house had an undoubted right to settle it in what manner they
thought meet ; that it Avould be impious, as well as illegal, to abrogate
their constitution; that you could only modify and improve it in a way
consistent with their manifest intention ; that the honour of religion re-
' Wesley's Works, vol. xii., p. 140.
2)7^ Life and Times of Wesley.
1782 quired you to make a legal and effectual provision for payment of a just
debt ; — when these things, I say, are calmly considered, candour must
'■^ ' admit, every preacher of righteousness must acknowledge, that the pre-
sent trust deed is modelled with that rectitude and propriety, which
become Christian men.
"As nothing can discourage me when I am engaged in a righteo s
cause, I mean to write again to Mr. Charles Wesley; and, therefore, if I
have omitted, in my former address, any topics or arguments which occur
to you or friends, I wish you would specify them in ivi'iting; though I
shall certainly now speak to him more in a professional style than in a
religious one.
"Yours most sincerely,
"James Carr."
In the mean time, the new chapel was built, and Dr. Coke
took up the matter. The following also is a letter now for
the first time published. It was addressed to Mr. Charles-
worth.
"Bristol, October 18, 1782.
"Sir, — There is but one argument, which you have used, which ap-
pears to me to have any force in it against the many uncontrovertible
arguments, which I have urged on the other side. It is this ; is it not
unjust, that the persons who have advanced money on the building, which
has been lately erected, should lose that money, when they advanced it
upon the word of Mr. Wesley, and would not have advanced it on any
other ground .'' In answer to this, I observe, that, as I am in this busi-
ness the servant of the conference, and have invested in me a discretionary
power to act as I see occasion, I will, therefore, remove this objection as
far as justice, equity, and my trust, will admit me to go. For this pur-
pose, I promise and engage, that the interest of the money, which has been
lent on the lately erected building, shall be regularly paid, either out of
the profits of that building, or out of the profits of the building which is to
be erected, or out of the profits of both of them together, so long as the
two Messrs. Wesley live ; and, after their decease, as long as the lately
erected building is at the disposal of the Methodist conference, and no
longer. Provided, that either of the chapels, or both of them together,
produce an income sufficient to pay the aforesaid interest, after paying
for the necessary repairs, and the ;^io paid to the support of the preachers,
be deducted. Provided, also, that the debt itself, which has been already
incurred, remain upon the lately erected edifice, and upon that alone,—
J promise and engage, that the aforesaid interest shall be paid to the
creditors annually in preference to every other payment, except the said
necessary repairs, and ^10 towards the support of the preachers.
" I am, sir, your humble servant in the gospel,
" Thomas Coke."
Shortly after, Dr. Coke publi-shed a i2mo tract of 12 pages,
Birstal CJiapeL Case. 379
entitled, "An Address to the inhabitants of Birstal, and the iT^z
adjacent villages." He relates how the attorney of the trust- Age 79
ees obtained Wesley's signature to the deed. He states, that
Charles Wesley had not signed, and, he believed, never would.
The *^ amazing deed" had been discussed at the late con-
ference, and had created just alarm ; and he (Dr. Coke) had
been delegated to carry into execution the minute that
was passed ; but, upon application to the trustees, he had
" found the greatest part of them determined to hold fast
their unlimited and most dangerous power." He answers the
objection, "Would it not be equally dangerous to invest this
power in the conference ^ " by saying, " No : for the plan of
settlement, adopted by the conference, ties them down to the
principles of religion at present held by the Methodists." He
relates, that he had proposed to the trustees to submit the
matter to the arbitration of the attorney general, or some
other eminent counsellor ; and had engaged that, if the
opinion thus obtained was the same as that of the trustees
and Mr. Carr, " Birstal preaching house should be considered
an exempt case, and the trustees should be suffered quietly to
retain all the power which they had at present"; with the
understanding, on the other hand, that, if the legal opinion
of the arbitrator was, " that the surviving trustees, with the
consent of the original proprietor, and all the parties con-
cerned, could resettle the house on the Methodist plan,
they would resettle it accordingly." He had also added, at
another meeting, that, in such a case, he would give a bond
of five or six hundred pounds, that the trustees, who had
advanced the ;^350, should not only have their interest, but
'&i€\x principal, paid them, in instalments of;;^50 per annum ;
and, further, that he would engage, that all subscribers to the
recently erected building, " who signified their desire of
having their money returned, should have it returned to them
Avithin two years." The trustees^ however, " obstinately
refused to comply with this."
Coke continues :
" Afterwards, another plan of reconciliation was proposed, by one of
themselves, to which we all consented, namely, that all the trustees should
bind themselves by a deed, that if they, or the major part of them, should
agree, after the demise of the Messrs. Wesley, to choose an independent
Age 79
380 Life and Times of Wesley.
1782 teacher, they should be obliged to signify this their intention, by three
years' notice to the conference, or to the moderator of the conference for
the time being ; with a provision, that, if the preachers were ever to
desist from meeting in regular conference, as they did at present, or to
deviate from the grand Methodist plan on which they at present act, then
the full power should immediately devolve upon the trustees, and they
might, without any previous notice whatever, choose an independent
teacher."
Such was the unanimous agreement. A rough draft of the
intended deed was made, and (Jwrresco j-cf evens !) was brought,
by the attorney of the trustees, to Dr. Coke on the Sunday
following. On reading it, Coke found a (qw words inserted,
which upset the whole. It read : " If the said trustees and
leaders, or the major part of them, shall at any time, in their
judgment, think that the said conference deviates from the
grand Methodist plan, then," etc., " thus constituting them-
selves judges in their own cause." Dr. Coke objected to
this ; and they seemed willing to give it up ; but " desired
that another meeting might be held on the following Sunday!
at which all the leaders might be present, that their consent
might also be procured." The conference representative
agreed to this ; Sunday came ; and the trustees and leaders
" would not move a single step."
Such had been the negotiations, and such was the state of
affairs, when Dr. Coke published his pamphlet in November,
1782. He makes an appeal "to the congregation, and to the
society," and concludes with the following prayer : " O Thou
Lover of concord and Prince of peace, keep these little ones
under Thy fostering wing. Preserve them from the silken
tongued sycophant, the sly deceiver, who seeks his own, and
not the things of Jesus Christ. Hide them for a little moment
in the chambers of Thy love, till this and every indignation be
overpast. Keep them close to the bleeding side of Jesus, and
close to the affectionate hearts of their faithful pastors for
ever."
What more was done .'' Two months after this, on January
3, 1783, Wesley issued a folio circular, entitled, "The Case of
the Birstal House." * This all can read for themselves in
^ The copy before us is addressed " To Mr. Thompson, at the Method-
ist chapel, Hull," and is signed by Wesley in his own handwriting.
Birstal Chapel Case. 381
Wesley's collected works (vol. xiii., p. 260). Suffice it to say, 1782
that the reasons assigned by Wesley, why neither the Birstal, Age~79
nor any other Methodist chapel, should be settled according
to the Birstal deed, were: (i) It would put an end to itinerant
preaching, for when the trustees got a preacher whom they
liked, they would keep him. (2) It would put a bridle in the
preacher's mouth ; for how would he dare to speak the full
and the whole truth, when he was liable to lose his bread ?
(3) " The power of the trustees w^as greater than that of any
nobleman ; yea, or of the king himself. Where he is patron,
he can pitt in a preacher, but he cannot put him out." He
concludes: "No Methodist trustees, if I can help it, shall,
after my death, any more than while I live, have the power of
placing and displacing the preachers."
So the thing went on. A case was submitted to Mr. John
Maddocks, barrister, for his opinion, as to the possibility of
legally making such an alteration in trust deeds, as was
desired in the Birstal case. His opinion, dated " Lincoln's
Inn, July 24, 1783," is before us, and is to the effect, that
such an alteration might be made. On the 5th of September
following, Wesley met the nineteen trustees, and offered to
allow the same clause to be inserted in a new deed as was
inserted in the deed of the chapel in City Road, namely, " In
case the doctrine or practice of any preacher should, in the
opinion of the major part of the trustees, be not conformable
to Mr. Wesley's Sermons and Notes on the New Testament,
on representing this, another preacher shall be sent within
three months." Five of the trustees were willing to accept of
this ; the rest refused.
In an unpublished letter, written by Dr. Coke, and addressed
to Mr. Benson, only ten days after this interview, there are
some other particulars given. Wesley first told the trustees,
he wished their chapel to be settled according to the Method-
ist plan contained in the minutes of conference. He then
offered to allow the clause to be inserted which has just been
mentioned ; adding, " this was never allowed to any trustees
before, and never shall again while I live." He further offered
to relieve the trustees of their ^^350 debt, promising to give
£\Q)0 himself, and saying, "This I do, because I love you, and
for old acquaintance sake." And he further promised to
S2 Life and Tmies of Wesley.
1782 make them a present of the piece of ground which Dr. Coke
A"e~79 li^d purchased for the site of another chapel. The names of
the five consenting trustees were, Nathaniel Harrison, An-
thony Williamson, John Aspinall, Joseph Bennett, and
James Blackburn.^
The dissentient trustees took time to think. On September
25, 1783, Christopher Hopper WTOte to one of them, Mr.
Charlesworth, in a somewhat ambiguous style, as follows.
" My very dear Joseph, — It gives me pleasure to hear that you were
so well satisfied with Mr, Wesley's temper and conduct ; and I am glad
to hear you behaved so well. Solemn conference ! Great expectations !
Grand overture ! But alas ! no decision ! Mortifying indeed ! I still
wish we never had given you any trouble, but patiently waited the event.
But, if you are determined to stand your ground after this meeting, I
cannot tell what the consequence will be. Great grace be on you all !
"C. Hopper." 2
Reflection often brings wisdom. On the 13th of January,
1784, Mr. Charlesworth wrote to Wesley, saying, that his offer
would now be accepted. He says, with a Yorkshire keenness,
which smacks of avarice —
" We cannot but acknowledge your goodness in promising the land, and
the money towards paying our debt, which will be two very convenient
articles at this place, as we are in great want of both.
" I am, reverend and dear sir, for and on behalf of the trustees,
" Yours very affectionately,
" Joseph Charlesworth." '
The result was, a new deed was made, giving the conference
power to appoint preachers; and this serious hubbub,/;'^ tcin.,
subsided. We shall soon have to recur to the same subject ;
and this apparently long and tedious digression may serve
as an introduction to what will have to be said hereafter. The
controversy was the first battle fought for restricting, or rather
for setting aside, an ecclesiastical power, which has grown to
be the greatest exercised by any church throughout the
whole of the Christian world ; and perhaps, on this ground,
the writer will be pardoned for trespassing on the reader's
^ Coke's manuscript letter.
2 Manuscript letter. ^ Ibid.
Rev. Thomas Davenport. 383
patience ; and especially as many of the incidents are now for 1782
the first time published.^ Age~79
We return to Wesley, Of course, the dispute at Birstal led
to much unpleasantness ; but Wesley was firm in maintaining
discipline. Hence the following, addressed to Mr, Valton,
then one of the Birstal preachers.
''June 18, 1782.
"AlY DEAR Brother, — I cannot allow J S to be any longer a
leader ; and, if he will lead the class, whether I will or no, I require you to
put him out of our society. If twenty of his class will leave the society
too, they must. The first loss is the best. Better forty members should
be lost, than our discipline be lost. They are no Methodists, tJuit ivill bear
no restraints. Explain this at large to the society.
" I am, your affectionate friend and brother,
"John Wesley." 2
Wesley's clerical friends were now regularly and constantly
increasing. He had, to some extent, outlived their brotherly
persecution. They began to appreciate his motives and his
services ; and, so far from hooting and hissing him, began to
greet him, to court his company, and to ask his counsel.
Among others of this description may be mentioned the Rev.
Thomas Davenport, who was now in his sixtieth year, but
had only recently found peace with God, and that principally
through Wesley's help.' Wesley wrote to him as follows.
"Bristol, August 14, 17S2.
"Dear Sir, — It would have given me a good deal of satisfaction to
have had a little conversation with you. But I do not stay long in one
place. I have no resting place on earth :
* A poor wayfaring man,
I dwell in tents below,
Or gladly wander to and fro,
Till I my Canaan gain.'
" You would have been very welcome at our conference. Mr. Pugh
and Mr. Dodwell* were present at it ; and, I believe, are more determined
than ever to spend their whole strength in saving their own souls, and
them that hear them.
" I believe, that one of our preachers, who are stationed in the Leicester
circuit, will call upon you at Alexton ; and I make no doubt but some of
' For the manuscripts that have been used, I am indebted to the kindness
of Mr. Clapham, of Birstal.
2 Methodist Mao;azine, 1824, p. 307. 3 ji^j^j^ j^^q^ pp j^g^ j^^_
■* Both clergymen.
Age 79
384 Life and Times of Wesley.
1782 the seed which you have been long sowing will then grow up. No one
should wish or pray for persecution. On the contrary, we are to avoid it,
to the uttermost of our power. ' When they persecute you in one city, flee
unto another.' Yet, when it does come, notwithstanding all our care to
avoid it, God will extract good out of evil.
"To-morrow I am to set out for Cornwall. In about three weeks, I ex-
pect to be here again. In the beginning of October, I generally move
towards London ; in the neighbourhood of which I usually spend the
winter.
" I am, dear sir, your affectionate friend and brother,
"John Wesley."*
The day after this letter was written, Wesley set out
westwards. On reaching Exeter, where his old antagonist.
Bishop Lavington, once resided, he met with a most
friendly welcome; and, by invitation, dined on the Sunday,
with the bishop, in his palace, five other clergymen and
four of the aldermen of Exeter being present besides him-
self Arriving at Plymouth, Wesley preached in the Square,
and, while doing so, a regiment of soldiers, with military
music, marched into it. No sooner, however, did the com-
manding officer perceive the preacher, than he stopped the
music, and drew up his men to listen. " They were all still
as night;" says Wesley, "nor did any of them stir, till I had
pronounced the blessing."
In Cornwall, he found an old clerical friend at the point of
death, the Rev. Mr. Thompson, rector of St. Gennis. It was
now thirty-seven years since Wesley first preached in Mr.
Thompson's church, and, throughout the whole of that period,
they had been faithful friends. The dying rector wished once
more to see his old acquaintance. Wesley, borrowing the
best horse he could find, and riding as fast as he was able,
says: "I found Mr. Thompson just alive, but quite sensible.
He had many doubts concerning his final state, and rather
feared, than desired, to die; so that my whole business was
to comfort him, and to increase and confirm his confidence in
God. He desired me to administer the Lord's supper, which
I willingly did ; and I left him much happier than I found him,
calmly waiting till his change should come."
While riding to see his friend, Mr. Thompson, Wesley
^ Wesley's Works, vol. xii., p. 475.
Jo Jin Trcmbath. 3S5
was accosted by an old acquaintance of another sort. He 1782
writes : " On the way, I met with a white headed old man, A^Trg
who caught me by the hand, and said, ' Sir, do you not
know me?' I answered, 'No.' He said, 'My father, my
father ! I am poor John Trembath.' I desired him to speak
to me in the evening at Launceston ; which he did. He was,
for some time, reduced to extreme poverty, so as to hedge
and ditch for bread; but, in his distress, he cried unto God,
who sent him an answer of peace. He, likewise, enabled him
to cure a gentleman that was desperately ill, and afterwards
several others ; so that he grew into reputation, and gained a
competent livelihood. 'And now/ said he, ' I want for
nothing : I am happier than ever I was in my life.' "
Who was John Trembath .'' One of Wesley's first itiner-
ants, who commenced his ministry in 1743, and, for several
years, laboured with diligence under Wesley's direction,^ — a
man of great eloquence and zeal,^ — a burning and shining light,
and a workman who, at one time, according to Wesley, had no
need to be ashamed,' — a preacher not deep, and yet so popu-
lar as to be almost idolised by the people ;* but who, alas !
for the last twenty years, had sunk into an extreme of sin, and
shame, and misery. Naturally vain, the applauses of the
people spoiled him. He became bouncing, and boastful, and
not always truthful. He married, gave up reading, turned to
farming, and kept company with men who had just wit
enough to " talk of bullocks," and to " smoke, drink, and
flatter him." He became a sportsman, and was suspected of
smuggling.^ His career was almost a romance. But now, to
use Wesley's language, " John Trembath was alive again." ^
A month after the strange interview above related, Trembath
wrote to Wesley : "Though God has forgiven me, yet I cannot
forgive myself for the precious time I have wasted, the years
I have lost, and the glorious harvest I have neglected." ' Poor
Trembath died of paralysis, at Cork, about the year 1793.^
' Myles's History. - Methodist Magazine, 1826, p. 794.
^Wesley's Works, vol. xiii., p. 309.
< Methodist Magazine, 1782, p. 468.
* Ibid. 1798, p. 492 ; and 1780, p. 448.
* Wesley's Works, vol. xiii., p. 13.
' Methodist Magazine, 1790, p. 557.
Everett's " Methodism in Sheffield."
VOL. III. C C
386 Life and Times of Wesley.
1782 Such were the old friends whom Wesley met in Cornwall.
A^79 Getting back to Bristol, on September 6, he found a new
one, young, but warm hearted, honest, and faithful. Adam
Clarke, just emerging out of his teens, had arrived from
Ireland. He had travelled from Birmingham to Bristol upon
a penny loaf and a halfpennyworth of apples ; and had just
three halfpence left when he got to Kingswood school. He
met with a reception from Simpson, the head master, as frigid
as cold heartedness could make it. Simpson's stupid, imperious
wife made bad things worse, by suspecting that the young Irish-
man might be afflicted with the itch, and by making him rub
himself from head to foot with Jackson's ointment. This " in-
fernal unguent," as Adam calls it, made him smell worse than
a polecat. His only sustenance was bread and milk ; and not
enough of that. For more than three weeks, no one per-
formed any kind act for him. As for Mrs. Simpson, he feared
her as he feared the devil. At length, Wesley arrived from
Cornwall ; Clarke was introduced ; Wesley laid his hands
upon his head, and spent a it\v minutes in beseeching God to
bless him ; and then gave him his commission to proceed to
Wiltshire as a Methodist preacher. Fifty years after this,
Adam Clarke died in London, — an old itinerant preacher,
without a spot on the fair escutcheon of his character, — one
of the most extensively learned scholars of the age, — a
voluminous author, — the friend of philosophers and princes, —
and a man intensely beloved by nearly all who knew him.
Wesley left Bristol for London on October 7, and, on his
way, preached at Newport in the Isle of Wight. He writes :
" This place seems now ripe for the gospel, opposition is at
an end."
At, Newport the first Methodist preaching place was a room
in Node Hill ; and the opposition, referred to by Wesley,
consisted of the beating of drums, tin kettles, and bells ; the
throwing of rotten eggs, sticks, and stones ; sparrows let loose
in the room for the purpose of putting out the lights ; and
covering the chimney top and fastening the door, in order to
stifle the imprisoned worshippers. It was at Newport, that
Robert Wallbridge heard Wesley preach ; was converted ;
became a Methodist; and a Methodist local preacher. Eliza-
beth Wallbridge, his sister, was now a light haired, ruddy
" The Dairyman s Daughter.'' 387
faced, and merry hearted girl, of twelve years old. Of scho- ^^7^
lastic learning she had but a slender share ; and had to earn Age 79
her bread as a household servant. She had a high flow of
spirits, vanity, and ready wit, and was inordinately fond of
dress. Elizabeth was converted under the ministry of James
Crabb, a Methodist preacher, became a Methodist herself,
and continued such to the end of life. Her father joined the
church presided over by the Rev. Daniel Tyerman, who
published an account of him, in a well written tract, a short
time before he set sail on his mission to the South Sea islands.
Elizabeth's brother Robert, for more than forty years, was a
Methodist local preacher, and died at Newport in 1837. Eliza-
beth herself died, at the age of thirty-one, in the year 1801 ;
the Rev. Legh Richmond visited her in her last moments; and
afterwards wrote her life, with ,the title of " The Dairyman's
Daughter," omitting to state, however, that his heroine was a
Methodist. Millions of copies of that publication have been
circulated ; it has been translated into, at least, thirty
languages ; and, thirty years ago, it had been the means of
the conversion of three hundred and fifty persons. '
Wesley reached London on October 1 1. Here, and in
eight or nine of the southern counties of England, he spent,
according to his custom, the remainder of the year.
His publications, in 1782, were few in number.
1. An Extract from his Journal, from January i, 1776, to
August 5, 1779. i2mo, 112 pages.
2. " Alleine's Alarm to the Unconverted." i2mo, 107
pages.
3. "An Estimate of the Manners of the present Times."
l2mo, 23 pages.
This was an exceedingly characteristic piece. With
terrible severity, he lashes the vices of the age ; the sloth-
fulness of people of fashion ; the increase of luxury, both in
meat, drink, dress, and furniture; and lewdness of every
kind. He writes : " A total ignorance of God is almost uni-
versal among us. The exceptions are exceeding few, whether
among the learned or unlearned. High and low, cobblers,
tinkers, hackney coachmen, men and maid servants, soldiers,
' Dyson's " History of Methodism in the Isle of Wight."
388 Life and Times of Wesley,
1782 sailors, tradesmen of all ranks, lawyers, physicians, gentle-
Age 79 men, lords, are as ignorant of the Creator of the world as
Mahommedans or pagans."
4. The Arminian Magazine. 8vo, 680 pages. Here we
have an engraving of the new chapel in City Road, with
portraits of George Story, etc. About forty pages are filled
with a continuation of Wesley's translation of the Dialogues
of Castellio on Election and Free Will. There are long
extracts from Wesley's " Survey of the Wisdom of God in
Creation"; and from Dr. Watts's Treatise on the Passions.
Remarks upon Locke's Essay on the Human Understanding
make a part of every number. Memoirs and happy deaths
are more numerous than ever. There are sixty letters, and
as many poems. There are six original sermons by Wesley
himself. One, on " Redeeming the Time," is a vigorous
enforcement of the principles propounded in his letter to his
niece in 1781.^ Another is a remarkable homily on "Dust
thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return " ; and another,
equally striking, is on God's six days' work. Then there is
his magnificent sermon on, "Not as the transgression, so is
the free gift." And, lastly, there is his terrific discourse on
the Punishments of Hell. If the Armitiian Magazine had
done nothing more than give birth to sermons like these,
it would have rendered incalculable service to the cause of
Christ.
In addition to the above, the magazine contains several
original articles, by Wesley's pen, of great interest and im-
portance. In one, on Persecuting Papists, he says : " I set out
in early life with an utter abhorrence of persecution in every
form, and a full conviction, that every man has a right to
worship God, according to his own conscience. I would not
hurt a hair of the head of Romanists. Meantime, I would not
put it into their power to hurt me, or any other persons
whom they believe to be heretics. I would neither kill, nor
be killed. I wish them well; but I dare not trust them." In
another article there is an onslaught on the " Divinity and
Philosophy of the highly illuminated Jacob Behmen"; con-
* In 1783, this sermon was reprinted, in a separate form, without
Wesley's knowledge, by a gentleman of Cambridge, in i2mo.
Jacob Bchmen. 389
eluding thus : " May we not pronounce, with the utmost cer- 1782
tainty, of one who thus distorts, mangles, and murders the Age 79
word of God, That the light which is in him is darkness; that
he is illuminated from beneath, rather than from above ;
and that he ought to be styled DeinoncsopJier, rather than
Thcosophcr ? "
This was savage ; and Wesley's old friend, Mr. Harry
Brooke, of Dublin, wrote him a letter of earnest remon-
strance ; to which Wesley replied as follows.
"April 21, 1783.
" Dear Harry, — Your letter gave me pleasure and pain. It gave
me pleasure, because it was written in a mild and loving spirit; but it
gave me pain, because I found I had pained you, whom I so tenderly love
and esteem. But I shall do it no more. I sincerely thank you for your
kind reproof. It is a precious balm, and will, I trust, in the hands of
the Great Physician, be the means of healing my sickness. I am so
sensible of your real friendship herein, that I cannot write without
tears. The words you mention were too strong. They will no more fall
from my mouth.
" I am, dear Harry, affectionately yours,
"John Wesley."^
This may serve as an erratum, belonging to the Arminian
Magazine of 1782,
» Walton's " Memorial of W. Law," p. 91 ; and Brooke's Life,
194.
1783.
17^3 /~\NE of the first entries in Wesley's journal, in 1783, is
Age 80 ^<-^ the following. "Friday, January 10 — I paid one
more visit to Mr. Perronet, now in his ninetieth year. I do
not know so venerable a man. His understanding is little,
if at all, impaired ; and his heart seems to be all love. A
little longer, I hope, he will remain here, to be a blessing
to all that see and hear him." This is beautiful, after an un-
broken friendship of about forty years.
Another entry, equally deserving of being noted, was as
follows: "Sunday, January 19 — I preached in St. Thomas's
church in the afternoon, and at St. Swithin's in the evening.
The tide is now turned ; so that I have more invitations to
preach in churches than I can accept of." What a contrast
between 1783 and 1739!
Wesley was an unendowed clergyman ; but was not un-
supported. The funds, raised for his purposes, were large ;
but his own appropriation from them, not equal to the poor
parson's, who was " passing rich on ;^40 a year." In re-
ference to the London annual audit, he writes : " Friday,
February 21 — At our yearly meeting for that purpose, we
examined our yearly accounts, and found the money received,
(just answering the expense,) was upwards of ;^3000 a year.
But that is nothing to me : what I receive of it, yearly, is
neither more nor less than £^0."
Wesley w^as an old manj but he was still an outdoor
preacher : for five-and-forty years he had been branded as
a schismatic and a Dissenter ; but he was still an ardent
Churchman. Hence the following, addressed to Joseph
Taylor, one of his itinerant preachers.
" London, January 16, 1783.
" Dear Joseph, — I am glad to hear so good an account of Marazion.
You must endeavour to hire a larger room at Truro. We shall not
build any more in haste. I often preach abroad, in winter as well as
summer.
"In my journals, in the magazine, in every possible way, I have advised
Age 80
Preachers Forbidden to meet Classes. 391
the Methodists to keep to the Church. They that do this most prosper 1783
best in their souls ; I have observed it long. If ever the Methodists
in general were to leave the Church, I must leave them.
" I am, dear Joseph, your affectionate friend and brother,
"John Wesley."*
An extract from another letter may be inserted here,
showing that, rightly or wrongly, the Methodist preachers
of the present day have departed from one of the principles
of their founder. Ministerial classes are now almost general.
Hear what Wesley had to say, on this subject, to John Cricket,
then stationed, with Henry Moore, at Londonderry.
" London, February 10, 1783.
"My dear Brother, — You must immediately resume the form at
least of a Methodist society. I positively forbid you, or any preacher, to
be a leader ; rather put the most insignificant person in each class to
be the leader of it. And try if you cannot persuade three men, if no
more, and three women, to meet in band.
" Hope to the end ! You shall see better days ! The plainer you
speak, the more good you will do. Derry will bear plain dealing, I am
just as well as I was forty years ago.
" I am, yours affectionately,
"John Wesley." ^
The hale old man soon found himself in a different plight.
On March 2, he set off for Bristol, in the neighbourhood of
which he spent the next twelve days, preaching and meeting
classes. He then became seriously unwell ; but, for two days
longer, continued preaching, when he was obliged to take his
bed. He had a deep tearing cough ; was weak and heavy,
and in a fever. He had fixed the next morning for commenc-
ing his journey to Ireland, and had sent notice to Stroud, and
various other places, of the days wherein he purposed to visit
them. Fortunately, the Rev. Brian Collins was at hand, and
undertook to supply his appointments as far as Worcester.
Accordingly, Mr. Collins, in the morning of March 17, set out
to preach at Stroud; but Wesley, finding himself better, in the
afternoon, imprudently set out after him, and actually gave
a short exhortation to the Stroud society. For the next
three days, he was dangerously ill. The whole nervous system
was violently agitated. His cough was most distressing. He
^ The JFc's/iyan, Sept. g, 1846.
2 Wesley's Works, vol. xiv., p. 343.
392 Life and Times of Wesley.
1783 was seized with cramp. He was bereft of strength, "scarce
AgeSo 'ible to move, and much less to think." Before leaving Bristol,
he wrote the following unpublished letter to Miss Hester
Ann Roe, afterwards Mrs. Rogers.
"Bristol, March 16, 1783.
"My dear Hetty, — It has frequently been on my mind of late,
that my pilgrimage is nearly at an end ; and one of our sisters here told
us this morning a particular dream which she had two months ago. She
dreamt, that the time of conference was come, and that she was in a
church expecting me to enter ; when she saw a coffin brought in, followed
by Dr. Coke and Mr. Fletcher, and then by all our preachers walking two
and two. A fortnight ago, she dreamt the same dream again. Such
a burying I have ordered in my will, absolutely forbidding either hearse
or coach.
" I intended to have written a good deal more. For a i&yn days, I have
had just such a fever as I had in Ireland a few years ago. But all is well.
I am in no pain ; but the wheel of life seems scarcely able to move. Yet,
I made a shift to preach this morning to a crowded audience, and hope
to say something to them this afternoon. I love that word, 'And Ishmael
died in the presence of all his brethren.'
"I am, in hfe or death, my dear sister, yours affectionately,
"John Wesley."'
What was the result .'* The news of Wesley's being dan-
gerously ill flew far and wide. A number of the preachers
met together to pray for a further prolongation of his life ;
and, from that time, he rapidly recovered.^ For three days
he lay at Stroud, in great danger. On the morning of the
fourth day, he wrote : "A violent fit of the cramp carried the
fever quite away ; and, perceiving this, I took chaise without
delay, and reached Worcester in the afternoon. Here I over-
took Mr. Collins, \\\\o had supplied all my appointments, with
a remarkable blessing to the people ; and, the next morning, I
gave a short exhortation, and then went on to Birmingham."
At Birmingham, he was electrified, and "ventured to preach
three quarters of an hour." He then made his way to
Hinckley, where, for three days, he preached morning and
evening, " to a serious and well behaved people." He then
visited other societies on his way to Holyhead, and reached
Dublin on April 13.
For three weeks, he was the guest of Mr. Henry Brooke,
* Manuscript letter. ^ Mrs. Rogers' Life, p. 473.
Wesley s Trip to Holland. 39-?
J
and was employed in healing serious divisions in the Dublin 1783
society.^ Four days were spent in holding a conference with a^Tso
his Irish preachers, at which, he says, " all was peace and
love," " I wish," he writes, " all our English preachers were of
the same spirit with the Irish, among whom is no jarring
string. I never saw such simplicity and teachableness run
through a body of preachers before."^ This was a high com-
pliment paid to Thomas Rutherford, Andrew Blair, Zechariah
Yewdall, Richard Boardman, Thomas Barber, Henry Moore,
John Cricket, John Crook, and their twenty-six colleagues in
Christian enterprise and labour.
Wesley embarked for England on the 8tli of May, and,
after preaching at Warrington, Liverpool, Wigan, Bolton, and
other places, reached Manchester nine days afterwards. Here
he had an enormous sacramental service, at which thirteen
or fourteen hundred communicants were present: "such a
sight," says he, "as, I believe, was never seen in Manchester
before." " I believe," he adds, " there is no place but London
where we have so many souls so deeply devoted to God."
Leaving Manchester, he proceeded to Macclesfield, where a
week never passed " in which some were not justified, and
some renewed in love." He preached, for the first time, at
Buxton, where John Knowles and his wife were almost the
only Methodists, and frequently rode on horseback to
Stockport, a distance of sixteen miles, to hear the Methodist
preachers.^ Here he married a couple of his friends, and
preached in the parish church. He arrived in London on
May 31.
On June 11, accompanied by Messrs. Brackenbury, Broad-
bent, and Whitfield, he set out for Holland. For more
than forty years, Wesley had been incessantly at work
forming Methodist societies. Up to the present, he had
never indulged in the luxury of a ministerial holiday ; and
we are not sure, that his trip to Holland should be regarded
in such a light as that. Still, there was a difference
between this journey and others. In other instances, his
object was to institute Methodist societies, or to strengthen
' Life of Brooke, p. ico. ^ Wesley's Works, vol. xii., p. 141.
^ Methodist Magazine, 185 1, p. 313.
394 Zz)^ and Times of Wesley.
^783 those already formed ; in this instance, that was no part
Age 80 of the object at which he aimed. He went, says Mr.
Moore, "partly for relaxation, and partly to indulge and
enlarge his catholic spirit, by forming an acquaintance with
the truly pious in foreign nations." The fact is, one of
his own local preachers, whom he highly esteemed, Mr.
William Ferguson, had removed to Holland, and, by
his earnest piety, had attracted the attention of the public
generally, including many of the principal inhabitants
and persons in authority. He spoke much of Wesley
and of the Methodists, and distributed Wesley's sermons
among his friends. The result was a general wish to see
the veteran evangelist, and to hear him for themselves. One
difficulty, however, was in the way. Wesley was acquainted, to
a greater or less extent, with the Hebrew, Greek, and Latin,
the English, French, German, and Spanish languages; but he
knew nought of Dutch. This objection was surmounted by
Mr. Ferguson's son, Jonathan, offering to act as his interpreter.^
Accordingly, off Wesley went, accompanied by the three
preachers above mentioned.
His visit was eminently pleasant. Ministers of religion
welcomed him; and persons of high rank showed him honour.
At Rotterdam, he preached twice, in the episcopal church, to
large congregations, and says : " Were it only for this, I am
glad I came to Holland." At the Hague, in the house of a
lady of the first quality, he met a dozen ladies and two
military gentlemen, expounded the first three verses of the
thirteenth of the first epistle to the Corinthians, and prayed,
Captain M interpreting sentence by sentence. Wesley
writes : "I believe, this hour was well employed." He held a
sort of service in the passenger boat between Haarlem and
Amsterdam. That is, he and his friends began to sing a
hymn ; the people listened ; Wesley talked ; Ferguson inter-
preted; "and all our hearts," says Wesley, " were strangely
^ The Fergusons, father and son, were notable persons. Mr. Ferguson,
sen., was a well known local preacher for upwards of sixty yea,rs ;
Jonathan, his son, was a friend, and sometimes the travelling companion,
of John Howard the philanthropist. He was a hearty Methodist, a happy
Christian, and, at the age of eighty, died a triumphant death, at Islington,
in 1844. — (^Methodist Magazine, 1845, p. 292.)
Wesley s Trip to Holland. 395
knit together, so that, when we came to Amsterdam, they 1783
dismissed us with abundance of blessings." A^Tso
At Utrecht, Wesley wrote: "June 28 — I have this day lived
fourscore years ; and, by the mercy of God, my eyes are not
waxed dim, and what little strength of body or mind I had
thirty years since, just the same I have now. God grant I
may never live to be useless ! rather may I
* My body with my charge lay down,
And cease at once to work andhve !'"
On the same day, he made a short excursion. Hence, the
following extract from the diary of the Moravian congregation
at Zeyst :
" 1783, June 28. — We kept the children's prayer day. The Rev. John
Wesley, the well known Methodist minister, arrived here in the afternoon,
with several other ministers. After visiting his old friend, Brother Anton,
he paid a hurried visit to the brethren's house, and sisters' house; and
then attended a children's lovefeast, at three o'clock ; on which occasion,
as it happened to be his eightieth birthday, the children sang a few bene-
dictory verses for him ; the congregation closing the service by singing
' The grace of our Lord be with us all ! ' At 4.30 p.m. he and his com-
panions returned to Utrecht, where he had preached the day before."
Wesley spent altogether seventeen days in Holland, and
was delighted with his visit. He writes : " I can by no
means regret either the trouble or expense, W'hich attended
this little journey. It opened me a way into, as it were, a
new world ; where the land, the buildings, the people, the
customs, were all such as I had never seen before. But as
those with whom I conversed were of the same spirit with my
friends in England, I was as much at home in Utrecht and
Amsterdam, as in Bristol and London." " There is a blessed
work at the Hague, and many other of the principal cities ;
and, in their simplicity of spirit, and plainness of dress, the
believers vde with the old English Methodists. In afifection,
they are not inferior to any. It was with the utmost difficulty
we could break from them." ^ " Two of our sisters, when we
left the Hague, came twelve miles with us on the way; and one
of our brethren, of Amsterdam, came to take leave of us to
^ Wesley's Works, vol. xii., p. 358.
39^ Life and Times of Wesley.
1783 Utrecht, above thirty miles. I beheve, if my life be prolonged,
AoTso ^ shall pay them a visit at least every other year. Had I had
a little more time, I would have visited our brethren in
Friesland, and Westphalia likewise ; for a glorious work
of God is lately broken out in both these provinces." ^
Wesley got back to London on July 4. Ten days later, he
set off to his conference at Bristol. "I expect," says he,
"a good deal of difficulty at this conference, and shall stand
in need of the prayers of you and your friends." ^ His
apprehension was realised ; hence the following entry in his
journal: "July 29 — Our conference began, at which we
considered two important points : first, the case of Birstal
house ; and, secondly, the state of Kingswood school. With
regard to the former, our brethren earnestly desired, that I
would go to Birstal myself, believing this would be the most
effectual way of bringing the trustees to reason. With regard
to the latter, we all agreed, that either the school should cease,
or the rules of it be particularly observed : particularly, that
the children should never play, and that a master should be
always present with them."
We need not recur to the first of these points, except to
add, that the Birstal chapel case, no doubt, led to the adoption
of the following resolutions :
" Question 21. What houses are to be built this year?
'■''Answer. None that are not already begun.
" Q. 22. Has not the needless multiplying of preaching houses been a
great evil ?
" A. So it appears.
" Q. 23. How may this be prevented ?
"yi. By permitting none for the future to beg for any house, except in
the circuit where it stands.
"■ Q. 24. What can be done to get all our preaching houses settled on
the conference plan ?
"A. Let Dr. Coke visit the societies throughout England, as far as is
necessary for the accomplishment of this end ; and let the respective
assistants give him all the support in their power."
Such was the commission given to Dr. Coke, a weary and
worrying one.
Kingswood school, however, was as great a bore as Birstal
^ Wesley's Works, voL xiii., p. 60. *Ibid. p. 60.
Kingswood School. 397
chapel. It had now existed for five-and-thirty years ; it had 1783
been to Wesley a source of almost ceaseless trouble, and was Age 80
now in a worse state than ever. Nevertheless, it was a far
famed institution; and, besides the sons of itinerant preachers,
it had, at this very time, parlour boarders from Denmark,
Norway, Sweden, and the West Indies. None of the scholars
however, were remarkable for piety or learning ; and the
young gentlemen, just mentioned, had spoiled the discipline
of the school, Thomas Simpson, M.A., was head master;
Mrs. Simpson housekeeper ; Cornelius Bayley was English
teacher, with a salary of ^12 per annum and his board;
Vincent de Boudry was occasional French teacher; and
C. R. Bond a sort of half boarder, and assistant to Bayley.^
"My design in building the house at Kingswood,'' says Wesley, "was
to have therein a Christian family ; every member whereof, (children ex-
cepted,) should be alive to God, and a pattern of all holiness. Here it
was that I proposed to educate a few children, according to the accuracy
of the Christian model. And almost as soon as we began, God gave us
a token for good, four of the children receiving a clear sense of pardon.
But, at present, the school does not, in any wise, answer the design of its
institution, either with regard to religion or learning. The children are
not religious: they have not the power, and hardly the form of religion.
Neither do they improve in learning better than at other schools ; no, nor
yet so well. Insomuch, that some of our friends have been obliged to
remove their children to other schools. And no wonder that they improve
so little either in religion or learning ; for the rules of the school are not
observed at all. All in the house ought to rise, take their three meals, and
go to bed at a fixed hour. But they do not. The children ought never to
be alone, but always in the presence of a master. This is totally neglected;
in consequence of which, they run up and down the wood, and mix, yea,
fight with the colliers' children. They ought never to play: but they do,
every day ; yea, in the school. Three maids are sufficient ; now there are
four; and but one, at most, truly pious.
"How may these evils be remedied, and the school reduced to its
^ Simpson was a man of learning and piety, but too easy for his situa-
tion. On leaving Kingswood, he wished to become an itinerant preacher,
but set up a school at Kevnsham, where his son ultimately was made
vicar. Bayley was a good Hebrew scholar, became a doctor of divinity,
had a church, St. James's, built for him in Manchester, and was highly
respected for his piety, usefulness, and high church principles. De Boudry
began a school on Kingsdown, Bristol, and long bore the character of a
pious, steady, honest man. Bond was affectionate, but not talented, and
aspired to become a clergyman. Such is the testimony of Adam Clarke ;
and it is only fair to give it as a counterpoise to the discreditable state of
the Kingswood school committed to their care.
39 8 Life and Times of Wesley.
"^l^Z original plan ? It must be mended or ended : for no school is better than
Afc 8o the present school. Can any be a master, that does not rise at five, ob-
serve all the rules, and see that others observe them ? There should be
three masters, and an usher, chiefly to be with the children out of school.
The head master should have nothing to do with temporal things." ^
This was a dark picture ; doubtless the result of bad man-
agement. Easy, good tempered Mr. Simpson was a scholar ;
his wife, the real governor, was an ogress. A woman that
rubbed Adam Clarke with the " infernal unguent " to cure
him of an imaginary itch ; thrust him into a solitary room, with
a wretched old bedstead, and left him there without book or
fire ; and from whom Adam, when he heard her voice, was dis-
posed to run in the utmost fright, was not the woman to manage
Kingswood school. " She was probably very clever," says
Clarke ; " all stood in awe of her ; for my own part, I feared
her more than I feared Satan himself. The school was the
worst I had ever seen, though the teachers were men of ade-
quate learning. It was perfectly disorganised; and, in several
respects, each did what was right in his own eyes. There was
no efficient plan pursued ; they mocked at religion ; and
trampled under foot all the laws. The little children of the
preachers suffered great indignities ; and, it is to be feared,
their treatment there gave many of them a rooted enmity
against religion for life. The parlour boarders had every kind
of respect paid to them, and the others were shamefully
neglected. Scarcely any care was taken either of their bodies
or souls."
Poor Kingswood ! Could all this be strictly accurate .-*
Probably it was ; for the following, given as a fact, prepares
the mind for almost anything in the form of stupidity, and
ignorant confusion. "At the table," writes Adam Clarke,
" every person when he drank was obliged to run the follow-
ing gauntlet. He must drink the health of Mr. Simpson,
Mrs. Simpson, Miss Simpson, Mr. Bayley, Mr. De Boudry, all
the foreign gentlemen, then all the parlour boarders, down
one side of the long table, and up the other, one by one, and
all the visitors who might happen to be there : after which it
was lawful for him to drink his glass of beer." ^
^ Minutes of Conference, 1783.
2 " Life of Adam Clarke," in three vols., 1833, vol. i., pp. 153-168.
Kingsivood ScJiool. 399
Wesley was quite right. No school at all was better than i7^3
such a school as this. It was hig'h time to mend it or end it. A^e 80
In his magazine, for the very month in which the conference
of 1783 was held, Wesley published an article, by his own
pen, entitled, " A Thought on the Manner of Educating
Children," in which he strongly maintains, that all education
ought to be religious ; but adds, probably with the state of
Kingswood in his eye, — " Even religious masters may still be
mistaken with regard to the manner of instilling religion into
children. They may not have the spirit of government, to
which some even good men are utter strangers. They may
habitually lean to this or that extreme, of remissness or of
severity. And if they either give children too much of their
own will, or needlessly and churlishly restrain them ; if they
either use no punishment at all, or more than is necessary,
the leaning either to one extreme or the other may frustrate
all their endeavours. In the latter case, it will not be strange,
if religion stink in the nostrils of those that were so educated.
They will naturally look on it as an austere, melancholy thing ;
and, if they think it necessary to salvation, they will esteem it
a necessary evil, and so put it off as long as possible."
Wesley was not the man to hesitate in changing his officials
when change was necessary. Mr. Simpson was dismissed ;
Thomas McGeary, A.M., a young man of twenty-two, took
his place.i Cornelius Bayley had previously made up his
mind to leave, in order to enter the ministry of the Estab-
lished Church j'^ and Thomas Welch, an assistant in a school
at Coventry, applied to be appointed his successor, Wesley
wrote to him as follows,
"Bristol, August 15, 1783.
" Dear Thomas, — You seem to be the man I want. As to salary, you
will have /30 a year; board, etc., will be thirty more. But do not come
for money, (i) Do not come at all, unless purely to raise a Christian
school. (2) Anybody behaving ill, I will turn away immediately. (3) I
expect you to be in the school eight hours a day. (4) In all things, I
expect you should be circumspect. But you will judge better by consi-
dering the printed rules. The sooner you come the better.
"I am, your affectionate brother,
"John Wesley."'
1 Methodist Mao^azine, 1788, p. i. ^ Manuscript letter,
' Methodist Magazine, 1S17, p. 324.
400 Life and Times of Wesley.
1783 Mr. Welch was a young man of twenty-three. Two years
AgeSo before, he had become a Methodist. The Coventry society,
then extremely feeble, was loath to lose him ; and some of
its members succeeded in persuading him to remain where
he was. He wrote to Wesley to this effect ; and Wesley
answered : " You use me very ill. I have turned away three
masters on your account. The person, who gives you this
advice, is wanting either in common sense or common
honesty."^ Mr. Welch became a valuable local preacher, and
lived and died a Methodist. Thomas Jones took the place
that he declined, and, for three years, retained it, when he
was ordained a clergyman of the Church of England.
This was Wesley's last complaint of Kingswood. Twelve
months afterwards, the school and family were visited with a
gracious outpouring of God's good Spirit. In 1786, he says:
" I found the school in excellent order." " It is now one of
the pleasantest spots in England. I found all things just
according to my desire ; the rules being well observed, and
the whole behaviour of the children showing, that they were
now managed with the wisdom that cometh from above." In
1787, he expressed himself to the same effect, as, in fact, he
did to the end of life. The last entry in his journal, in refer-
ence to this memorable place, — a child, always with him a
pet, though often troublesome, — was this : " 1789, September
II — I went over to Kingswood: sweet recess! where every-
thing is now just as I wish. But
' Man was not born in shades to lie ! '
Let us work now ; we shall rest by-and-by. I spent some
time with the children ; all of whom behaved well : several
are much awakened, and a few rejoicing in the favour of
God."
We must now bid a final adieu to dear old Kingswood
school, the sacred scene of so many Methodistic memories,
and turn to other matters connected with the conference of
1783.
The number of members was reported to be 45,955 ; but
all these were Methodists within the limits of the United
^ Methodist Magazine, 181 7, p. 324,
Letters to William Black. 401
Kingdom. No account was taken of the 13,740 Methodists in 1783
America. No mention was made of Antigua, where nearly AgTso
2000 persons had joined John Baxter's society ; and where, in
this very year, the first Methodist chapel in the torrid zone
was completed.'^
Nova Scotia also is not noticed ; though it had been the
scene of a most blessed work, and William Black had
written to Wesley, urgently asking him to send them
preachers. The following were Wesley's answers.
" LONDOX, February 26, 1 783.
" My dear Brother, — I did indeed very strongly expostulate with
the Bishop of London, concerning his refusing to ordain a pious man,
without learning, while he ordained others that, to my knowledge, had no
piety, and but a moderate share of learning.
" Our next conference will begin in July ; and I have great hopes, we
shall then be able to send you assistance. One of our preachers informs
me, he is willing to go to any part of Africa or America. He does not
regard danger or toil ; nor, indeed, does he count his life dear unto him-
self, so that he may testify the gospel of the grace of God, and win sinners
to Christ. But I cannot advise any person to go alone. Our Lord sent
His disciples two and two. And I do not despair of finding another
young man, as much devoted to God as he.
" Of Calvinism, mysticism, and antinomianism, have a care ; for they
are the bane of true religion ; and one or other of them has been the
grand hindrance of the work of God, wherever it has broke out.
" I am, my dear brother, yours affectionately,
" John Wesley." 2
The second letter to William Black was as follows.
" London, July 13, 1783.
" My dear Brother, — It is a rule with me, to answer all the letters
which I receive. If, therefore, you have not received an answer to every
letter which you have written, it must be, either that your letter or my
answer has been intercepted.
" I do not wonder at all, that, after that great and extraordinary work
of God, there should be a remarkable decay. So we have found it in
almost all places. A swift increase is generally followed by a decrease
equally swift. All we can do to prevent it, is continually to exhort all
who have tasted that the Lord is gracious, to remember our Lord's words,
'Watch and pray that ye enter not into temptation.'
" The school at Kingswood is exceeding full ; nevertheless there shall
be room for you. And it is very probable, if you should live to return to
* Coke's Life, by Drew, p. 167.
2 Black's Memoirs, p. 99.
VOL. in. D D
Ace 80
402 Life and Times of Wesley.
1 7 S3 Halifax, you may carry one or more preachers with you. I hope you will
live as brethren, and have a free and open intercourse with each other.
" I am, my dear brother, affectionately yours,
" John Wesley." ^
Such was the wish of WilHam Black ; and such was
Wesley's intention ; but it was not until 1785, that Nova
Scotia appeared in the minutes of conference as a Methodist
circuit. " The harvest truly was great ; but the labourers
were few." And yet all that offered were not accepted.
At the conference of 1783, there was present a young Welsh-
man, of middle stature, thin and delicate, with a somewhat
elongated face, an eye of genius, and a capacious forehead,
who offered himself as an itinerant preacher, but whom
Wesley and his brethren, from the delicacy of his health and
the feebleness of his voice, thought not equal to the arduous
labours of the itinerant office. He had been converted under
the preaching of Samuel Bardsley, and, soon after his offer
was declined by Wesley, was ordained by Bishop Horsley,
and became vicar of Llanbister. The vicarage had a parlour,
with a slab stone floor, an open chimney, and a hearth on
which burnt a fire of wood and turf It had a kitchen, and two
upper rooms of the same humble character. For many a
long year this was the home of the Rev. David -Lloyd, " a
philosopher, a poet, and a divine," says Dr. Dixon, " who
seemed to enjoy, with unmixed contentment, the inheritance
given him by Providence." P'or fifty years, his wife was a
Methodist, and his parsonage a Methodist preachers' home.
Besides poetical works of considerable merit, the good vicar
became the author of a large octavo volume of very valuable
essays, entitled " Horae Theologicse."^ Mr. Lloyd was a per-
fect enthusiast on the missionary question, and gave a sub-
scription of £\0 a year to the Methodist and Church
missionary societies respectively ; presented each with a
donation of ;i^50o; and left the residue of his property, after
other demands had been satisfied, to be equally divided
between these two institutions. He also built a Methodist
chapel on his estate, and secured it to the connexion by
deed. Thus, as a diligent clergyman of the Church of
^ Black's Memoirs, p. 109.
' Methodist Magazine, 18 16, p. 832.
Wesley seriously III. 403
England, and the friend and host of Methodist preachers, 1783
Hved and died the good vicar of Llanbistcr, — a candidate Age 80
rejected by the conference of 1783.^
In the midst of this conference, Wesley was again seized
with an alarming illness. Dr. Drummond attended him
twice a day. I lis friends thought, that his end was come ;
and he himself apprehended that the cramp would probably
reach his stomach, and occasion sudden death. " I have been
reflecting on my past life," said he to his faithful nurse,
Joseph Bradford; "I have been wandering up and down
between fifty and sixty years, endeavouring, in my poor way,
to do a little good to my fellow creatures ; and, now, it is
probable that there are but a few steps between me and
death ; and what have I to trust to for salvation ? I can see
nothing which I have done or suffered, that will bear looking
at. I have no other plea than this :
* I the chief of sinners am,
But Jesus died for me.'" ^
For eighteen days, Wesley hung between life and death,
when, finding himself somewhat better, and "being," as he
says, " unwilling to be idle," he spent an hour with the Bristol
penitents. The day following, he preached twice, and, the
day after that, on Monday, August 25, set out again on his
much loved gospel ramblings. Death itself, to Wesley, was
more desirable than life without work.
Preaching on his way at Gloucester, Worcester, and
Birmingham, he came, on August 29, to Stafford, where he
writes ; " I preached, for the first time, to a large and deeply
attentive congregation. It is now the day of small things
here ; but the grain of mustard seed may grow up into a
great tree."
Four years before this. Dr. Coke was passing through
Stafford, and, while dining at the inn, sent the bellman round
to announce to the inhabitants that he would preach in the
market place. Jeremiah Brcttell, his companion, took a table
from the hostelry ; the doctor mounted ; the people came ;
all listened with deep attention ; and some expressed a wish
* Methodist Magazine, 1863, sixpenny edition, p. i.
2 Moore's Life of Wesley, vol. ii., p. 389.
404 Life and Times of Wesley.
17S3 for the visit to be repeated. Soon after, a little society was
Age 80 formed/ which, in 1784, consisted of sixteen members, Henry-
Robinson being leader.^
From Stafford, Wesley made his Avay to Macclesfield,
where he preached twice in the Rev. David Simpson's church,
and had a sacramental service, at which seven hundred com-
municants were present.
He was now proceeding to Birstal, to effect the settle-
ment with the Birstal chapel trustees, as already related.
The journey occupied sixteen days ; the distance was five or
six hundred miles ; according to his wont, he preached all the
way there and back ; and yet, the old man, who a month
before had been on the very verge of death, returned to Bristol
on the 13th of September, almost as vigorous as ever.
An unpublished letter, belonging to this period, may be
welcome here. It was addressed to John Atlay, his book
steward.
" Leeds, September 3, 1783.
"My dear Brother, — The schoolmasters for Kingswood are fixed,
and expected there every day. Mr. Simpson's sister is the housekeeper,
who is come hither in her way to Bristol. Let no man or woman go
to West Street chapel without my appointment. It is a matter of deep
concern. The building or not building, at Birstal, does not depend upon
me, but the' trustees. J. Fenwick is to correct the press chiefly, in the
absence of Dr. Coke, and to transcribe tracts for me. And he may receive
his httie salary^, at least, till I return to London.
" I am, with love to sister Atlay, your affectionate brother,
"John Wesley."
Wesley remained in the neighbourhood of Bristol till
October 6, and employed the interval, not only in preaching,
but in begging money to relieve the distresses of the desti-
tute, and in visiting the poor recipients at their own houses.
" I was surprised," says he, " to find no murmuring spirits
among them, but many that were truly happy in God ; and
all of them appeared to be exceeding thankful for the
scanty relief which they received."
' Methodist Magazine, 1830, p. 657.
2 The names were: Henry Robinson, Mary Robinson, Charles Machin,
John Smith, Ann Stockdale, William Holding, Sarah Holding, John
Rowland, Sarah Jervis, Thomas Smith, Elizabeth Smith, John Ward, Ann
Ward, John Kelsall, Thomas EUey, and William Freepound.— (Burslem
old circuit book.)
Wesley and the Poor. 405
No wonder, that such a man was popular ; and no wonder, 1783
that his presence was a loadstone drawing the poor around Age 80
him. Sometimes, however, their absence would have been
more welcome than their company. A month after this,
Wesley was at Norwich, and, when leaving, had a whole host
of poverty stricken people about his carriage. His purse was
low, containing only what was necessary to take him back to
London ; and the clamour of the mendicant crowd, for once,
disturbed his temper. Somewhat sharply he said ; " I have
nothing for you. Do you suppose I can support the poor
in every place.''" At the moment, he was entering his
carriage; his foot slipped; and he fell upon the ground. Feel-
ing as though God Himself had rebuked him for his hasty
words, he turned to Joseph Bradford, and, with subdued
emphasis, remarked : "It is all right, Joseph; it is all right;
it is only what I deserved ; for if I had no otJtcr good to give,
I ought, at least, to have given them good words." ^
The concluding months of the year were employed, as
usual, partly in London, and partly in the surrounding
counties.
Considering Wesley's advanced age, his labours are without
parallel. Here we have, — not a man of Herculean frame, big,
brawny, and heavy, fed on the daintiest diet, and stimulated
with the costliest wines, — but a man small in stature, his
weight eight stones and ten pounds (exactly the same as it
was fourteen years before), his age eighty, without indulgences,
feeding, for eight months in every year, chiefly at the tables
of the poor, sleeping on all sorts of beds and in all sorts of
rooms, without a wife, without a child, really without a home ;
and yet a man always cheerful, always happy, always hard at
work, flying with all the sprightliness of youth throughout the
three kingdoms, preaching twice every day, indoors and out
of doors, in churches, chapels, cottages, and sheds, and every-
where superintending the complex and growing interests
of the numerous societies which had sprung into buoyant
being through the labours of himself and his godly helpers.
The man was a marvel, such as the world sees only now and
then. Once show him the path of duty, and with a dauntless
' Everett's Life of Clarke.
4^6 Life and' Times of Wesley,
1783 step he trod it. Nothing frightened him ; nothing could allure
Age 80 fi'om the post assigned to him by Providence, However
arduous the work, and however great the privations and the
dangers, if his Master bid him go, he went, trusting in his
Master's power for defence and help. " My brother Charles,"
he once remarked, " amid the difficulties of our early ministry,
used to say : ' If the Lord would give me wings, I would fly.'
I used to answer, ' If the Lord bid me fly, I would trust Hirh
for the wings.'" ^
One of the last acts of this youthful octogenarian, in 1783,
was to pay a pastoral visit to another of the most remark-
able men of that period, — Dr. Samuel Johnson, who was
now suffering his last illness, and died twelve months after-
wards.
Wesley's publications, in 1783, were the following.
1. "The Spirit of Prayer." 24 pages, i2mo.
2. "Baxter's Call to the Unconverted." ']6 pages, i2mo.
3. "The Important Question. A Sermon. By John Wesley."
23 pages, i2mo.
Besides these, Wesley also published many new editions
of former tracts, for the use of his recently instituted tract
society, most of these reissues having upon the title page,
"This tract is not to be sold, but given away."
His principal publication, however, was his Arminian
Magazine, and this was as vigorously conducted as before.
Again, we have half-a-dozen original sermons, by Wesley
himself, all of them remarkable, and among the most able
that he ever published. These include his two discourses
on good and fallen angels ; in which he propounds the
doctrine, that good angels minister to our happiness, by
assisting us in our searches after truth, by preserving us in
danger, by dreams, etc. : and that all evil angels are united
under one common head ; and are often the authors of
accidents, diseases, fires, storms, and earthquakes. Then
there is his elaborate sermon on " The Mystery of Iniquity,"
in which he expresses the opinion, that the " greatest blow
that genuine Christianity ever received was when Constantine
the Great called himself a Christian, and poured in a flood of
^ Methodist Magazine, 1825, p. 390.
Wesley's Publications, in i "i^'i)- 4^7
riches, honours, and power upon the Christians, more ^7^3
especially upon the clergy." Next we have his curious Age So
homily on the Spread of Christianity, where he hazards
the conjecture that truth will be transmitted from this nation
to that, until at last it reaches the South Sea islands. And,
finally, there are his characteristic sermons on Family
Religion, and on Training Children. As usual, every number
of the magazine has an article on the Calvinian controversy.
Biographical accounts are still numerous. Extracts from
his own Natural Philosophy, and from Locke's Essay on
the Human Understanding, form a part of each of the
twelve numbers ; as do also Benson's letters in reply to
Madan's treatise on polygamy ; likewise extracts from Dr.
Hilldrop's able " Thoughts on the Brute Creation," professedly
to prove a theory which Wesley liked, the ultimate restoration
of the brute creation ; and a series of profoundly thoughtful
articles on " The True Original of the Soul." Nine numbers
have extracts from Baxter's " Certainty of the World of
Spirits, fully evinced by unquestionable Histories of Appari-
tions and Witchcrafts." There are forty-five letters ; forty-one
poems ; and a number of portraits, including those of John
Hampson and William Thorn, both of whom left the
IMethodist connexion. There are also long continued extracts
from Bryant's Analysis of Ancient Mythology, w^hich
Wesley pronounces to be " one of the most remarkable
books, in its kind, which has been published for cen-
turies." And, finally, there are Wesley's " Thoughts on the
Writings of Baron Swedenborg." The baron, a little before
he died, presented Wesley with his last and largest theological
work, the "True Christian Religion"; but he failed to make a
convert of him. Wesley believed him to be insane, and
traced his insanity to a fever, which he had in London, when
" he ran into the street stark naked, proclaimed himself the
Messiah, and rolled himself in the mire." He w^as a " fine
genius, — majestic though in ruins."
1784
DR. WHITEHEAD calls the year 1784 "the grand
dhnacteric year of Methodism, because of the changes
which now took place in the form of its original constitution.
Not," says he, " that these changes destroyed at once the
original constitution of Methodism ; but the seeds of its
corruption and final dissolution were this year solemnly
planted, and have since been carefully watered and
nursed by a powerful party among the preachers." ^ The
doctor was an able man ; but he can scarcely be called a
prophet. Of course, he refers to Wesley's deed of declara-
tion, and Wesley's ordination of bishops for America ; both
of which must have due attention, before we conclude the
present year.
Wesley himself, according to his own correspondence,
seemed to grow younger as he grew older. In a letter to
"the Rev. Walter Sellon, at Ledsham, near Ferrybridge,
Yorkshire," and dated, "London, January 10, 1784," he
writes :
" On the 28th of last June, I finished my eightieth year. When I was
young, I had weak eyes, trembling hands, and abundance of infirmities.
But, by the blessing of God, I have outlived them all. I have no infirmi-
ties now, but what I judge to be inseparable from flesh and blood. This
hath God wrought. I am afraid you want the grand medicine which I
use, — exercise and change of air." ^
On the same day, he wrote another letter, now also, like the
former, for the first time published. Methodism had recently
been introduced, by a company of soldiers, into the Channel
islands ; and Mr. Robert Carr Brackenbury, with his servant,
Alexander Kilham, had gone to promote its interests. The
letter was addressed, " Robert Carr Brackenbury, Esq., in St.
Heliers, Isle of Jersey."
"London, yamiary 10, 1784.
" Dear Sir, — While those poor sheep were scattered abroad, without
^ Life of Wesley, vol. ii., p. 404. ^ Manuscript letter.
A Seven Months Joiirncy. 409
any shepherd, and without any connection with each other, it is no wonder 1784
that they were cold and dead. I am glad you have gathered a few of ■
them together, and, surely, if prayer be made concerning it, God will pro- ^
vide you with a convenient place to meet in. Perhaps an application to
the gentlemen, who have hired the ballroom, might not be without
success.
"'Tis pity but you had the 'Earnest Appeal' to present to the governor,
as well as the minister. I trust both you and our newly connected,
brethren will overcome evil with good. We can easily print the rules here,
and send them down with some other books. 'Tis good that every one
should know our whole plan. We do not want any man to go on blind-
fold. Peace be with your spirit !
" 1 am, dear sir, your affectionate friend,
"J. Wesley."
The first two months of 1784 were chiefly spent in London,
with the exception of a flying visit to Colchester, and another
to Nottingham ; Wesley's errand to the last mentioned place
being to "preach a charity sermon for the general hospital."
He had a grand covenant service in City Road chapel, at-
tended by upwards of eighteen hundred people. He took
counsel with the London preachers, as to the desirability of
the Methodists sending missionaries to India. He read
"Orlando Furioso," and says, "Ariosto had, doubtless, an un-
common genius, and subsequent poets have been greatly
indebted to him ; yet, it is hard to say, which was the most
out of his senses, the hero or the poet. He has not the least
regard even to probability ; his marvellous transcends all con-
ception. Who, that is not himself out of his senses, would
compare Ariosto with Tasso "i "
On the 1st of March, the venerable Wesley, — as agile as a
boy, above fourscore years of age, and yet reading the Italian
poet with all the zest of a youth still at school, — set out on
a seven months* journey, first to Bristol, then to Scotland,
then to Leeds, then through Wales to the west of England,
and then to London, which he reached on October 9. With a
hasty step, we must try to follow him.
Wesley, as opportunity permitted, " intermeddled with all
wisdom," and, to the end of life, showed, that a man is never
too old to learn. At Bradford, in Wiltshire, he says : " I was
convinced of two vulgar errors ; the one, that nightingales
v.'ill not li\/e in cages ; the other, that they only sing a month
or two in the year. Samuel Rayner has now three nightin-
4IO Life and Times of Wesley.
^7^4 gales in cages ; and they sing almost all day long, from
Age 8i November to August."
At Stroud, he wrote : " Here, to my surprise, I found the
morning preaching was given up, as also in the neighbouring
places. If this be the case while I am alive, what must it be
when I am gone .'' Give up this, and Methodism too will
degenerate into a mere sect, only distinguished by some
opinions and modes of worship."
Wesley considered, that preaching at five o'clock in the
morning was the healthiest exercise in the world ; and pro-
bably he was not far from being right. But besides this, these
early matutinal services had now, for five-and-forty years,
been one of the things which made the Methodists '' 2. peculiar
people," as well as " zealous of good works." No other church
or community, in England, had a service like this. It was a
religious ordinance which Wesley dearly loved. In thousands
of instances, he and his friends had proved the words, " Those
that seek Me early shall find Me." No wonder then, that he
evinced alarm when he found the Methodists giving up the
morning services. Three weeks after he was at backslidden
Stroud, he came to Chester, and expressed himself in the
strongest terms on this subject. He writes :
" I was surprised, when I came to Chester, to find that there also morn-
ing preaching was quite left off, for this worthy reason : ' Because the
people will not come, or, at least, not in the winter.' If so, the Methodists
are a fallen people. Here is proof. They have ' lost their first love ' ; and
they never will or can recover it, till they 'do the first works.' As soon
as I set foot in Georgia, I began preaching at five in the morning ; and
every communicant, that is, every serious person in the town, constantly
attended throughout the year ; I mean, came every morning, winter and
summer, unless in the case of sickness. They did so till I left the pro-
vince. In the year 1738, when God began His great work in England, I
began preaching at the same hour, winter and summer, and never wanted
a congregation. If they will not attend now, they have lost their zeal ;
and then, it cannot be denied, they are a fallen people. And, in the
meantime, we are labouring to secure the preaching houses to the next
generation ! In the name of God, let us, if possible, secure the present
generation from drawing back to perdition ! Let all the preachers, that
are still alive to God, join together as one man, fast and pray, lift up their
voice as a trumpet, be instant, in season, out of season, to convince them
that are fallen; and exhort them instantly to 'repent, and do the first
works': this in particular, — rising in the morning, without which neither
their souls nor bodies can long remain in health."
A Seven MontJis yoiLrney. 4 1 1
Perhaps this was looking at the thing too seriously. That 17^4
early morning service is highly profitable cannot reasonably Age 81
be called in question ; but, that it should begin at the hour of
five may fairly be disputed. Early risers are persons to be
envied ; they breathe the purest air, listen to the sweetest
songs, and have promptings to worship God that the sluggard
never feels.
At Tewkesbury, Wesley had to correct the " impropriety
of standing at prayer, and sitting while singing praise." At
Worcester, he "preached, to a crowded audience, in St.
Andrew's church." At Madeley, he preached twice in the
parish church, revised the vicar's letters to Dr. Priestley, and
declared, that there was hardly another man in England, so
fit to encounter the great Socinian philosopher as his friend
from the mountains of Switzerland. At Stafford, he preached,
to " a small company, in a deplorable hole, formerly a stable."
At Lane End, near Newcastle under Lyne, in the face of
one of the most piercing winds of the month of March, he
preached, by moonlight, in the open air, the congregation
being four times larger than the chapel could contain. At
Burslem, also, for the same reason, he was obliged to abandon
the chapel for the field. At Manchester, on Easter Sunday,
he had "near a thousand communicants"; Thomas Taylor
says, twelve hundred.^
Thus he employed himself all the way to Whitehaven, ^
where he "had all the church ministers" to hear him, "and
most of the gentry in the town"; and, to his evident surprise,
" they all behaved with as much decency as if they had been
colliers." At Edinburgh, he writes : " I am amazed at this
people. Use the most cutting words, and apply them in the
most pointed manner, still they Jicar, but fed no more than
the seats they sit upon." Throughout Scotland, morning
preaching and prayer-meetings had almost vanished. "At
Aberdeen," he writes, " I talked largely with the preachers,
and showed them the hurt it did both to them and the people,
for any one preacher to stay six or eight weeks together in
one place. Neither can he find matter for preaching every
morning and evening, nor will the people come to hear him.
^ Manuscript diary.
412 Life and Times of Wesley.
1784 Hence, he grows cold by lying in bed, and so do the people.
A^i Whereas, if he never stays more than a fortnight together in
one place, he may find matter enough, and the people will
gladly hear him. The preachers immediately drew up such a
plan for this circuit, which they determined to pursue."
From Aberdeen, Wesley went, by invitation, to Lady
Banff's at Old Meldrum, where he preached twice ; and
thence to Keith, where he had a congregation to his heart's
content, all the people poor, and "not a silk coat among
them." At Forres, he was the guest of Sir Lodowick Grant.
In making his way to Inverness, by the mistake of his coach-
man, he had to trudge, through heavy rain, twelve miles and
a half on foot, but says, he "was no more tired" than when
he first set out. At Elgin, he preached in the church, and
significantly remarks : " I do not despair of good being done
even here, provided the preachers be 'sons of thunder.' " At
Newburgh, he found " the liveliest society in the kingdom."
At Melval House, "the grand and beautiful seat of Lord
Leven," he was hospitably entertained by the countess and
her family, and, at their desire, preached from, " It is ap-
pointed unto men once to die." Here, also, he wrote his
" Thoughts on Nervous Disorders." His next halting place
was at Lady Maxwell's, " who appeared to be clearly saved
from sin, although exceedingly depressed by the tottering
tenement of clay."
After thus visiting most of the important towns in Scot-
land, Wesley reached Newcastle, where, on Whitsunday, he
preached thrice to large congregations. A week later, he
again set out, on his unwearied mission ; and, at Stockton,
"found an uncommon work of God among the children,"
upwards of sixty of whom, from the age of " six to fourteen,
were under serious impressions, and earnestly desirous to save
their souls." He writes : "As soon as I came down from the
desk, I was enclosed by a body of children ; all of whom
sunk down upon their knees : so I kneeled down myself, and
began praying for them." Beautiful picture this,- well worth
painting ! No wonder that he adds : " abundance of people
ran back into the house. The fire kindled, and ran from
heart to heart, till few, if any, were unaffected. Is not this a
new thing in the earth } God begins His work in children.
A Seven Mojiths Joiiriiey. 413
Thus it has been also in Cornwall, Manchester, and Epworth. ^7^4
Thus the flame spreads to those of riper years ; till at length Age 8f
they all know Him, and praise Him from the least unto the
greatest."
Having visited the "dales," Darlington, Northallerton,
Thirsk, Osmotherley, and other places, he made his way to
Whitby, where he wrote : " The society here may be a pattern
to all in England. They despise all ornaments but good
works, together with a meek and quiet spirit. I did not see a
ruffle, no, nor a fashionable cap among them ; though many
of them are in easy circumstances. About forty had a clear
witness of being saved from inbred sin ; and seemed to walk
in the full light of God's countenance."
At Scarborough, Wesley attended church, and was regaled
with one of the bitterest sermons he ever heard. " So," says
he, " all I have done, to persuade the people to attend the
church, is overturned at once ! And all who preach thus will
drive the Methodists from the church, in spite of all that I
can do." Two years after this, in a letter to his brother, he
wrote: "The last time I was at Scarborough, I earnestly
exhorted our people to go to church ; and I went myself.
But the wretched minister preached such a sermon, that
I could not in conscience advise them to hear him any
more. ^
From Scarborough, Wesley proceeded along the east coast
to Hull ; thence to Pocklington and York ; and thence to
Epworth, where he spent his birthday, and preached in the
market place of the town, whose church, for nine-and-thirty
years, had been blessed with the able and faithful ministry of
his honoured father. He writes : "June 28 — To-day I entered
on my eighty-second year, and found myself just as strong to
labour, and as fit for any exercise of body or mind, as I was
forty years ago. I do not impute this to second causes, but
to the sovereign Lord of all. It is He who bids the sun of
life stand still, so long as it pleascth Him, I am as strong at
eighty-one, as I was at twenty-one ; but abundantly more
healthy, being a stranger to the headache, toothache, and
other bodily disorders which attended me in my youth. We
* Wesley's Works, vol. xii., p. 144,
414 Life and Times of Wesley.
1784 can only say, 'The Lord reigneth!' While we live, let us
A^8i live to Him!"
Having spent a week in visiting the Lincolnshire societies,
Wesley proceeded to various towns in the west riding of
Yorkshire ; and thence, for the first time, to Burnley. He
writes: " Burnley had been tried for many years, but without
effect. Now, high and low, rich and poor, flocked together
.from all quarters ; and all were eager to hear, except one
man, who was the town crier. He began to bawl amain, till
his wife ran to him, and literally stopped his noise ; she
seized him with one hand, and clapped the other upon his
mouth, so that he could not get out one word. God then
began a work, which, I am persuaded, will not soon come
to an end." Wesley's words were verified.
Thomas Dixon, who was appointed to the Colne circuit
in 1784, remarks, in his unpublished diary: "The work
of God at Burnley was very young ; but many, during this
year, were converted. The great men of the place were
angry, and agreed to banish the Methodist preachers from the
town. The proprietor of the preaching house sent us notice
to quit the premises ; and the rest of the gentlemen pledged '
themselves not to let us have another. But about a month
before the expiration of the notice, the Lord converted a man,
who had a house of his own, which he opened to the preachers ;
and now we had a better preaching place than we had before.
Soon after a chapel was erected." One of the first members
was John Eagin,who, for fifty years, maintained an unspotted
character ; and died, in 1836, saying, " I am happy." ^
Leaving Burnley, Wesley went to Otley, where, marvellous
to relate! he had a two days' rest. He then, on July 18,
preached twice in Bingley church, a great part of his congre-
gation being obliged to stand outside. He writes : "Before
service, I stepped into the Sunday-school, which contains two
hundred and forty children, taught every Sunday by several
masters, and superintended by the curate. So many children,
in one parish, are restrained from open sin, and taught a little
good manners, at least, as well as to read the Bible. I find
these schools springing up wherever I go. Perhaps God may
1 Methodist Magazine, 1836, p. 397.
Snuday-schools. 4 1 5
have a deeper end therein, than men are aware of. Who 1784
knows but some of these schools may become nurseries for Age 81
Christians ?"
This is Wesley's first notice of Sunday-schools. Though
such schools had long existed in a few isolated cases, it was
not until now that they attracted public attention. Miss
Ball's Methodist Sunday-school at High Wycombe has been
already mentioned ; and it has also been stated, that Miss
Cooke, a Methodist young lady (afterwards the wife of
Samuel Bradburn), was the first to suggest to Robert
Raikes the idea of instituting a Sunday-school at Gloucester.
Raikes commenced that school about the year 1783. At all
events, his account of it was dated Gloucester, June 5, 1784,
and was published in the January number of W^esley's
Arviiiiian Magazine, iot 1785, with the title, "An Account
of the Sunday Charity Schools, lately begun in various parts
of England." Wesley was one of the first to catch and .
patronise the Sunday-school idea. At Bingley, he visited
the school before preaching in the church, and gave to
Sunday-schools one of their happiest designations, " nurseries
for Christians." Similar institutions had been begun in
Leeds, where Wesley was about to hold his conference.
The town was already divided into seven divisions ; and
had twenty-six schools, containing above two thousand
scholars, taught by forty-five masters. Each school com —
menced at one o'clock in the afternoon, the children being
taught reading, writing, and religion. At three, they were
taken to their respective churches ; then conducted back to
school, where a portion of some useful book was read, a
psalm sung, and the whole concluded with a form of prayer,
composed and printed for that purpose. Boys and girls were
kept separate. There were four " inquisitors," persons whose
office it was to spend Sunday afternoon in visiting the twenty-
six schools, to ascertain who were absent, and then in seeking
the -absentees at their homes or in the public streets. The _
masters were mostly pious men, and were paid from one to
two shillings a Sunday for their services, according to their
respective qualifications. Each had a written list of his
scholars' names, which he was required to call over, every
Sunday, at half-past one, and half-past five. Five clergymen
4i6 Life and Tmies of Wesley.
1784 visited the schools, and gave addresses; and the expenses
Age" 81 of the first year, ending in July 1784, were about -^234.
Such were the Sunday-schools at Leeds when Wesley, for
the first time, visited one in the neighbouring town of
Bingley. Manchester also had taken up Raikes' Methodist
idea; and, on the ist of August, 1784, Wesley's old friend, the
Rev. Cornelius Bay ley, D.D., who for ten years had been
one of the masters of Kingswood school, but was now an
ordained clergyman in this important city, published an
"Address to the Public on Sunday-Schools," in which he
gave an account of the schools at Leeds, and urged the men
of Manchester to copy so excellent an example. Bayley's
address produced a powerful efi'ect ; the magistrates patron-
ised his scheme ; and the result was, that Cornelius Bayley,
D.D., the quondam Methodist, and master of Wesley's
Kingswood school, became one of the chief, though not only,
instruments of establishing Sunday-schools in Manchester
and its neighbourhood.^
After visiting some of the intermediate towns and villages,
Wesley arrived at Leeds, for the purpose of holding his
annual conference. He writes :
"July 25, Sunday — I preached to several thousands at Birstal, and to,
at least, as many at Leeds. July 27, Tuesday — Our conference began ;
at which four of our brethren, after long debate (in which Mr. Fletcher
took much pains) acknowledged their fault, and all that was past was
forgotten. July 29, Thursday — Being the public thanksgiving day, as
there was not room for us in the old church, I read prayers, as well as
preached, at our room. Having five clergymen to assist me, we admi-
nistered the Lord's supper, as was supposed, to sixteen or seventeen
^ On Sunday, September 18, 1870, the London Road Methodist Sunday-
school, Manchester, removed from their somewhat dingy premises to a
new and more commodious building, erected in Grosvenor Street East,
and adjoining the Wesleyan chapel there. A card commemorative of the
event was presented to each person joining in the day's proceedings,
with the following inscription : " London Road Wesleyan Sunday School,
founded in 1785, by John Lancaster, and first conducted by him in a
cellar at the corner of Travis Street. It was soon after removed to a
room in Worsley Street, built specially for its accommodation, and there
carried on until November 10, 181 1, when it took possession of the then
new schools, situated behind Borough Buildings, and there continued until
this day, when it was again removed to the recently erected building
adjoining the Grosvenor Street chapel, in connnemoration of which event
this card is presented to . Manchester, September iS, 1870."
Confei^ence of 1784. 417
hundred persons. August i, Sunday — We were fifteen clergymen at the 1784
old church. August 3, Tuesday — Our conference concluded in much love, —
to the great disappointment of all." S^
Such are Wesley's brief notices of this momentous confer-
ence. Some additional incidents must be added. The war
of American independence was now ended, and the day of
public thanksgiving had reference to that event. In the
morning, at five, Thomas Hanby preached from, " My grace
is -sufficient for thee." Wesley's text, previous to the almost
unparalleled sacramental service, was I Corinthians xiii. 1-4.
The fiv^e clergymen who assisted him were Messrs. Coke,
Fletcher, Dillon, Bayley, and Simpson. In the afternoon, the
business of the conference was resumed ; and, at night, Wesley
preached again, taking as his text, " This is the first and
great commandment." Altogether, Wesley preached not
fewer than eight times during this important session, besides
regulating the ticklish and difficult business that had to be
transacted. ^
The " long debate," which Wesley mentions, had reference
to the deed of declaration, which must now have the best
attention that space permits us to give it.
At an early period of his history, Wesley published a model
deed for the settlement of chapels, to the effect, that the
trustees, for the time being, should permit Wesley himself
and such other persons as he might, from time to time,
appoint, to have the free use of such premises, to preach
therein God's holy word. In case of his death, the same right
was secured to his brother ; and providing that his brother's
decease occurred before that of William Grimshaw, the same
prerogatives were to belong to the last mentioned. After the
death of the three clergymen, the chapels were to be held, in
trust, for the sole use of such persons as might be appointed
at the yearly conference of the people called Methodists,
provided, that the said persons preached no other doctrines
than those contained in Wesley's Notes on the New Testa-
ment, and in his four volumes of sermons.^
Thus the matter stood in 1784. According to Myles*
Chronological History, there were, at this time, in the United
^ Melhcdist Maj^azine, 1845, PP- '2, 13.
^ Minutes of Conference, vol. i., p. 41.
VOL. TIL E E
41 8 Life arid Times of Wesley.
1784 Kingdom, three hundred and fifty-nine Methodist chapels;
A^Tsi and it may be fairly presumed, that most of these were
settled substantially according to the provisions of the deed
above mentioned.
Here it may be asked, what necessity was there for a
further deed ? The answer is, that, as yet, there was no legal
definition of what was meant by the term "conference of the
people called Methodists." To supply this defect, Wesley,
on the 28th of February, 1784, executed his famous deed of
declaration, which, a few days afterwards, was enrolled in the
high court of chancery. To use the language of the deed
itself, its object was "to explain the words, 'yearly con-
ference of the people called Methodists,' and to declare what
persons are members of the said conference, and how the
succession and identity thereof is to be continued."
The document proceeds to state, that the said conference
had always consisted of Methodist preachers whom Wesley
had annually invited to meet him for the following purposes :
namely, to advise with him for the promotion of the gospel
of Christ ; to appoint the said preachers, and other preachers
and exhorters in connection with him, to the use and
enjoyment of chapels conveyed upon trust as aforesaid ;
to expel unworthy preachers ; and to admit others on
probation.
The deed then gives the names and addresses of one hun-
dred preachers, who are now declared to be the members of
the said conference; and proceeds to state (i) That they and
their successors, for the time being for ever, shall assemble
once a year. (2) That the act of the majority shall be the
act of the whole. (3) That their first business, when they
assemble, shall be to fill up vacancies. (4) That no act of
the conference assembled shall be valid unless forty of its
members are present. (5) That the duration of the yearly
conference shall not be less than five days, nor more than
three weeks. (6) That, immediately after filling up vacan-
cies, they shall choose a president and secretary of their
assembly out of themselves. (7) That any member of the
conference, absenting himself from the yearly assembly
thereof for two years successively, without the consent or dis-
pensation of the conference, and who is not present on the
Deed of Declaj'ation, 419
first day of the third yearly asscmt)ly thereof, shall forthwith 1784
cease to be a member, as though he were naturally dead. (8) Age 81
That the conference shall and may expel any member thereof,
or any person admitted into connection therewith, for any
cause which to the conference may seem fit or necessary. {9)
That they may admit into connection with them any person,
of whom they approve, to be preachers of God's holy word,
under the care and direction of the conference. (10) That no
person shall be elected a member of the conference, who has
not been admitted into connection with the conference, as a
preacher, for twelve months. (11) That the conference shall
not appoint any person to the use of a chapel or chapels, who
is not either a member of the conference, or admitted into
connection with the same, or upon trial ; and that no person
shall be appointed for more than three years successively,
except ordained ministers of the Church of England. {12)
That the conference may appoint the place of holding the
yearly assembly thereof, at any other town, or city, than
London, Bristol, or Leeds, (13) That the conference may,
when it shall seem expedient, send any of its members as
delegates to Ireland, or other parts out of the kingdom of
Great Britain, to act on its behalf, and with all the powers of
the conference itself. (14) That all resolutions and acts
whatsoever of the conference shall be written in the journals
of the conference, and be signed by the president and secre-
tary thereof for the time being. (15) That \vhenever the
conference shall be reduced under the number of forty mem-
bers, and continue so reduced for three years successively ; or
whenever the members thereof shall decline or neglect to
meet together annually during the space of three years, the
conference of the people called Methodists shall be extin-
guished, and all its powers, privileges, and advantages shall
cease. (16) That nothing in this deed shall extinguish or
lessen the life estate of the said John Wesley and Charles
Wesley, or either of them, in any of the chapels in which they
now have, or may have, any estate or interest, power or
authority w'hatsoever.
Such was Wesley's deed of declaration, — a deed recognised
in the trust deeds of all the chapels that Methodism builds ;
and, hence, a deed investing a hundred Methodist preachers
420 Life and Times of Wesley.
1784 with the unexampled power of determining, irrespective of
Age 8i trustees, societies, and congregations, who shall be the offici-
ating ministers in the thousands of chapels occupied by
Methodist societies at home and abroad, throughout the
United Kingdom and throughout the world. We repeat, this
is an unexampled power ; and the ministers, invested with it,
ought to feel, that they have a corresponding responsibility to
God and to His church. High is the honour; the responsi-
bility is fearful. If Methodism should ever fail in its duty, or
fall to pieces, they, above all men else, must bear the blame.
We purposely refrain from raising the vexed question about
the kind of church government, involved in this great settle-
ment ; and proceed to notice the history of the deed of
declaration, up to the time of its being signed on February
28, 1784.
Mr. Pawson, in his manuscript memoir of Dr. Whitehead,
states that, from the year 1750, all Methodist chapels were
settled according to the provisions of the model deed that
has been already mentioned; but several of the "wisest and
best preachers " were not satisfied, and, from time to time,
brought up the matter at the yearly conferences, and earnestly
urged Wesley to do something more to preserve the chapels
for the purpose which the original builders intended. Wesley
replied, that the trust deed in itself was quite sufficient ; that
it had been drawn up by three of the most eminent counsel-
lors in London ; and that, even supposing there might be
some defect in it, no one would be so mad as to go to law
with an entire body of people like the Methodists. Such
reasoning failed to satisfy the preachers, especially Messrs.
Hampson and Oddie, both of whom, says Pawson, "were
men of remarkably deep understanding and sound judg-
ment." At length, Wesley began to yield to the pressure
that was brought upon him ; and various schemes were pro-
pounded to accomplish the purpose upon which men like
Hampson and Oddie had set their hearts. One was to
consolidate all the chapels in the connexion into a general
trust, the trustees to be chosen out of all the large societies
throughout the three kingdoms. Another was to have all the
chapel deeds brought to London, and deposited in a strong
box, to be provided for the purpose ; and, in execution of
Deed of Declaration. 421
this project, many were actually sent, and some were thereby i_7^4
lost. All this occurred previous to Dr. Coke's uniting himself Age 81
with Wesley ; and, from Pawson's testimony, wc now turn to
that of Coke.
In his "Address to the Methodist Society in Great Britain
and Ireland, on the Settlement of Preaching Houses," Coke
relates that, at the conference of 1782, the preachers seemed
to be universally alarmed at the danger arising from the want
of a legal definition of what was meant by the term, "the
conference of the people called Methodists"; and unani-
mously wished some method to be taken to remove a danger
which appeared to them to be pregnant with evils of the first
magnitude. In consequence of this. Coke took the opinion
of Mr. Maddox, one of the first counsel of the day, and
ascertained, that the law would not recognise the conference,
without some further definition ; and, consequently, that there
was nothing to preserve the Methodist connexion from being
shivered into a thousand fragments after Wesley's death. To
prevent this, Mr. Maddox advised, that Wesley should execute
a deed, specifying the persons by name who composed the
conference, together with the mode of succession for its per-
petuity. Dr. Coke read Mr. Maddox's opinion to the confer-
ence of 1783 ; and the whole conference expressed their wish
that such a deed should be drawn up and executed. Coke
immediately set to work, and, with the assistance of Mr.
Clulow, a solicitor, and Mr. Maddox, the barrister, a draft of
the deed was carefully prepared, and submitted to Wesley for
his approval. Coke's opinion was, that every preacher, in full
connexion, should have his name inserted ; and that admis-
sion into full connexion should, in the future, be looked upon
as admission into membership with the conference. Wesley
demurred to this, and determined to limit the number of
members to one hundred, and, without any advice from Coke,
made his own selections. In this form, the deed was executed;
and Coke sent copies of it to all the assistants of circuits
throughout the United Kingdom.'
We believe that this is, substantially, all that can be said
respecting the origin of what has been termed Methodism's
Magna Charta.
* Drew's Life of Coke, p. 37.
422
Life and Times of Wesley.
1784 What was the result? There were, at the conference of
Age 81 1783, one hundred and ninety-two preachers appointed to
sixty-nine circuits, throughout the three kingdoms. We have
no hesitancy in saying, that we think it would have been
wise to have inserted the names of the whole of these in the
deed of declaration, with the exception of twenty-two, who
were still on trial, and not admitted into full connexion. All
seemed to have an equal right to this ; and, thereby, all would
have been satisfied. Instead of this, W^esley proceeded to the
invidious task of selecting a hundred, and rejecting ninety-
two. It was a perilous experiment ; and the peril was aug-
mented by the mode in which the experiment was made.
For instance, sixteen were elected who had travelled less than
four years ; whereas among the rejected were the following.
Thomas Lee travelled
■ John Atlay
Joseph Thompson
John Poole
William Ashman
Jonathan Hern
William Eels
Thomas Mitchell*
Joseph Pilmoor
Besides, where was the fairness of choosing and refusing
the following preachers, who, at the time, were colleagues in
the same circuit }
ellec
1 36
years.
21
25
25
19
15
12
36
19
Natnes of Chosen. Years standing.
Joshua Keighley 3
Josepfh Cole 3
Jonathan Cousins .... 3
WiUiam Green 3
Joseph Taylor 6
WiUiam Hoskins . . . . i
WiUiam Myles 6
William Simpson .... 4
James Wray 2
Henry Foster 3
Names of Rejected.
William Horner .
Simon Day . . .
Robert Empringham
John Hampson, sen.
John Wittam . .
John Watson . .
( John Hampson, jun.
( George Snowden .
Thomas Johnson .
Thomas Wride . .
George Mowat . .
Years standing.
13
17
21
31
16
12
6
14
31
15
13
Wesley doubtless had a right to make any selection that
he liked ; but those who were not selected had an equal right
to grumble ; and we are not surprised that, sooner or later,
Deed of Declaration. 423
not fewer than nearly thirty of the rejected withdrew from 1784
the connexion altoG^ether. A^e 81
John Pawson writes :
" Mr. Wesley, designedly or otherwise, left out the names of several of
the old and respectable preachers ; and these good men were exceedingly
grieved and not without reason. Many of the trustees also were alarmed,
thinking that we wished to make the chapels our own property ; but
nothing of the kind was ever contemplated. The one design of the deed,
to my certain knowledge, was to prevent any preacher, who might be
inclined to settle, from taking possession of any of our chapels. The
preachers, whose names were inserted in the deed, so far from being
desirous to be distinguished above their brethren, very cheerfully complied
with Mr. Wesley's desire, and gave up every privilege granted to them in
the deed, except that of electing their own president and secretary, which
appears to me to be a matter of little consequence." ^
There can be no question, that the deed of declaration
occasioned great excitement. John Hampson, jun., says:
" Every itinerant had always considered himself as a member of con-
ference ; and, hence, when the ninety-one, who were to be excluded, saw
the deed, it was with astonishment and indignation. The injustice of the
thing stared them in the face ; and they found that, in consenting to such
a deed, they had consented, that all the affairs of the connexion should be
lodged in the hundred mentioned in the declaration ; that they should be
the lords and rulers of the rest ; and should have it in their power to
turn any other preacher out of the conference, and tell him he had no
business there. The exclusion itself was both an iniquitous and a morti-
fying measure. But the partiality of it rendered it still more oppressive.
Some of the oldest and ablest preachers, in the connexion, were excluded.
Many of the selected members were not only deficient in abilities, but
some of them, at the time of their insertion in the deed, were only upon
trial ; while the chief qualifications of others were ignorance, fanaticism,
and ductility. Under such circumstances, it is no wonder if the persons
excluded thought themselves aggrieved. They were really so, and
they made no scruple to declare their sentiments. They sent circular
letters, inviting all the preachers to canvass the business at the ensuing
conference ; and a large number assembled. Many of them were as
averse to the deed, as those who had so decidedly opposed it, and had
repeatedly execrated the measure, both by letter and in conversation; but
they had not the courage to avow their sentiments in conference. Mr.
Wesley made a speech, and invited all who were of his mind to stand up.
They all rose to a man. The five were found guilty, and it was unani-
mously determined, that they should either make concessions or be
dismissed. Urged by the entreaties of Mr. Fletcher, and anxious for
' Manuscript memoir of Whitehead.
424 Life and Times of Wesley.
Age 81
1784 the restoration of peace, the preachers in the opposition apologised to
Mr. Wesley, for printing the circular letter, without having first appealed
to conference."^
Such, in substance, and omitting acrid comments, is the
account given by John Hampson, jun. ; and there can be
httle doubt that, in the main, it is quite correct. The printed
circular he mentions was issued by his father, and was
entitled, "An Appeal to the Reverend John and Charles
Wesley ; to all the preachers who act in connection with
them; and to every member of their respective societies in
England, Scotland, Ireland, and America." ^ Another circular
was drawn up by James Oddie, in the form of a petition
to Wesley and the legalised conference, to the effect, that the
preachers, whose names had been inserted in the deed, would
sign an agreement that, at the death of Wesley, they would
refrain from taking any advantage of their position, but would
invite the excluded to their first conference, and would treat
them, in all respects, as equals. This was first suggested by
Robert Oastler, of Thirsk ; and was widely circulated, and
received with favour ;=^ and, perhaps, it was this that evoked
the following letter, which was written on April 7, 1785, and
entrusted to Joseph Bradford, to deliver to the conference,
at their first meeting after the writer's death.
"My dear Brethren, — Some of our travelling preachers have ex-
pressed a fear, that, after my decease, you would exclude them, either
from preaching in connection with you, or from some other privileges
which they now enjoy. I know no other way to prevent any such incon-
venience, than to leave these my last words with you.
" I beseech you, by the mercies of God, that you never avail yourselves
of the deed of declaration, to assume any superiority over your brethren;
but let all things go on, among those itinerants who choose to remain
together, exactly in the same manner as when I was with you, so far as
circumstances will permit.
"In particular, I beseech you, if you ever loved me, and if you now love
God and your brethren, to have no respect of persons in stationing the
preachers, in choosing children for Kingsvvood school, in disposing of the
yearly contribution and the preachers' fund, or any other of the pubhc
money ; but do all things with a single eye, as I have done from the
1 Hampson's Life of Wesley.
2 Smith's History of Methodism, vol. i,, p. 523.
3 Manuscript,
Deed of Declaration. 425
beginning-. Go on thus, doing all things without prejudice or partiality, 1784
and God will be with you even to the end. . \
"John Wesley." 1 ^^''^^'
This was a serious crisis in the history of Methodism.
Fortunately, it passed over without any other immediate
consequences than the retirement of the five principal
opponents to the deed of declaration, namely, the two
Hampsons, Joseph Pilmoor, William Eels, and John Atlay.
Considerable excitement, however, existed ; and, in the spring
of 1785, Wesley found it desirable to write his " Thoughts
upon some late Occurrences." He gives the history of the
origin of his conferences ; and states that the term conference
meant not so much conversation, as the persons that con-
ferred, that it had become necessary to define the term, and
that, at the conference of 1783, he had been requested to fix
the determinate meaning of the word. He accordingly took
counsel's opinion how to act, and was advised to execute a
deed of declaration. At first, he thought of naming only ten
or twelve ; but, on second thoughts, he believed there w^ould
be more safety in a greater number of counsellors, and, there-
fore, named a hundred ; as many as, he judged, could meet
without too great expense, and without leaving any circuit
without preachers while the conference assembled. He adds :
" In naming these preachers, as I had no adviser, so I had no respect
of persons ; but I simply set down those that, according to the best of my
judgment, were most proper. But I am not infallible. I might mistake,
and think better of some than they deserved. However, I did my best; if
I did wrong, it was not the error of my will, but of my judgment.
" This was the rise, and this the nature, of that famous deed of declara-
tion,— that vile, wicked deed, concerning which you have heard such an
outcry ! And now, can any one tell me how to mend it, or how it could
have been made better ? ' O yes. You might have inserted two hundred,
as well as one hundred, preachers.' No ; for then the expense of meeting
would have been double, and all the circuits would have been without
preachers. ' But you might have named other preachers instead of these.'
True, if I had thought as well of them as they did of themselves. But I
did not : therefore, I could do no otherwise than I did, without sinning
against God and my own conscience.
"' But what need was there for any deed at all?' There was the utmost
need of it ; without some authentic deed fixing the meaning of the term,
the moment I died, the conference had been nothing. Therefore, any of
^ Myles' History, p. 201.
426 Life and Times of Wesley.
^7^4 the proprietors of the land on which our preaching houses were built
AtTe 81 "light have seized them for their own use ; and there would have been
none to hinder them ; for the conference would have been nobody, a mere
empty name.
" You see then, in all the pains I have taken about this absolutely
necessary deed, I have been labouring, not for myself (I have no interest
therein), but for the whole body of Methodists ; in order to fix them upon
such a foundation as is likely to stand as long as the sun and moon
endure. That is, if they continue to walk by faith, and to show forth their
faith by their works ; otherwise, I pray God to root out the memorial of
them from the earth.
"John Wesley.'
"Plymouth Dock, March 2,, 1785."
We have done. All the facts, within our knowledge, have
been given. The reader must form his own opinion. Com-
ment would be easy ; but we purposely refrain ; only adding,
that, by Wesley's famous deed of declaration, the Methodist
conference became a legally incorporated institution ; and
that, without this, the Methodist itinerancy must have ceased,
and Methodism itself have been broken up into congrega-
tional churches.
We must now advert to another matter, which, if not of
equal, was of great importance, nainely, the episcopal organis-
ation of the Methodist societies in America. This has been
the subject of bewildering controversy for more than eighty
years. Wesley and Coke have been bitterly assailed, and as
warmly defended. We will narrate the facts as simply and
briefly as we can.
During the American war, which was now ended, the
American Methodists had multiplied with marvellous rapidity.
In 1774, they numbered 2073; in 1784, they were 14,988;
showing an increase of 12,915. They had 46 circuits, and
^l itinerant, besides some hundreds of local, preachers.^ All
these, so far as the sacraments were concerned, were as sheep
without shepherds. Some of the clergymen of the Church of
England had taken military commissions in the army ; others
were destitute of both piety and sense ; and nearly all
opposed and persecuted the Methodists to the utmost of
their power. Bishop White testified, that "the Church of
"^ Methodist Magazins, 1785, p. 269. ^ American minutes.
Ordination of Preacha^s for America. 427
England was becoming more and more unpopular, — with 1784
some, because it was not considered as promoting piety, — Age 81
and with others, because they thought the provision for it
a useless burden on the community." At the termination
of the revolutionary struggle, says Dr. Hawks, himself a
clergyman, " a large number of the churches in Virginia
were destroyed or irreparably injured ; twenty-three of her
ninety-five parishes were extinct or forsaken ; and of the
remaining seventy-two, thirty-four were destitute of minis-
terial services ; while of her ninety-eight clergymen, only
twenty-eight remained." The Rev. Mr. Jarratt, another
clergyman of the Church of England, stated, that "most
of the clergy preached what was little better than deism,"
and were bitter revilers and persecutors of those who
preached the truth.^
Under these circumstances, the Methodists demanded of
their preachers the administration of the sacraments. Many
of the societies had been months, some of them years, without
these sacred ordinances. Five years before this, in 1779, the
preachers in the south proceeded to ordain themselves by the
hands of three of their senior members, unwilling that their
people should longer be denied the Lord's supper, and their
children and probationary members the rite of baptism.
Asbury was greatly annoyed at this, and, a year afterwards,
with difficulty succeeded in persuading them to suspend the
administration of the sacraments till further advice could be
received from Wesley .^ Asbury wrote to Wesley, telling him of
the greatness of the work, and of the division that had taken
place in Virginia, on account of the people's uneasiness
respecting the sacraments. Thousands of their children were
unbaptized, and the members of the societies, in general,
had not partaken of the Lord's supper for many years.'
" Dear sir," says he, on March 20, 1784, "we are greatly in
need of help. A minister, and such preachers as you can fully
recommend, will be very acceptable. Without your recom-
mendation, we shall receive none. But nothing is so pleasing
1 Bangs' " Original Church of Christ," p. 114.
2 Stevens' History of Methodism, vol. ii., p. 212.
s Moore's Life of Wesley, vol. ii., p. 326.
428 Life and Times of Wesley.
1784 to me, sir, as the thought of seeing you here ; which is the
Age~8i ardent desire of thousands more in America."^
Wesley's going was impossible. He had tried (as we have
already seen) to induce Bishop Lowth to ordain a minister,
and had failed. What else remained t He thought of Dr.
Coke, who replied as follows.
"Near Dublin, April 17, 1784.
" Honoured and very dear Sir, — I intended to trouble you no
more about my going to America ; but your observations incline me to
address you again on the subject.
"If some one, in whom you could place the fullest confidence, and
whom you think likely to have sufficient influence and prudence and
delicacy of conduct for the purpose, were to go over and return, you
would then have a source of sufficient information to determine on any
points or propositions. I may be destitute of the last mentioned essential
qualification (to the former I lay claim without reserve); otherwise my
taking such a voyage might be expedient.
" By this means, you might have fuller information concerning the state
of the country and the societies than epistolary correspondence can give
you ; and there might be a cement of union, remaining after your
death, between the societies and preachers of the two countries. If the
awful event of your decease should happen before my removal to the
world of spirits, it is almost certain, that I should have business enough,
of indispensable importance, on my hands in these kingdoms.
" I am, dear sir, your most dutiful and most affectionate son,
"Thomas Coke."^
This is a curiously expressed letter ; but if it means any-
thing, it means, that if Wesley would be good enough to
think and say, that Coke had "sufficient influence, and
prudence, and delicacy of conduct," he was willing to become
Wesley's envoy to the American Methodists.
Here the matter rested, until the assembling of the con-
ference at Leeds. Mr. Pawson, in his manuscript memoir of
Dr. Whitehead, relates, that ordination was first proposed by
Wesley himself in his select committee of consultation.
Pawson was a member, and was present. He writes : " The
preachers were astonished when this was mentioned, and, to
a man, opposed it. But I plainly saw that it would be dene,
as Mr. Wesley's mind appeared to be quite made up."
Coke, Whatcoat, and Vasey were appointed to America ;
"^ Methodist Magazine, 1786, p. 682. ^ Manuscript letter.
Ordifiaiioji of PixacJicrs for America. 429
and, six days after the conference concluded, Coke wrote to 17 84
Wesley as follows. Age~8i
^'■August 9, 1784.
• " Honoured and dear Sir, — The more maturely I consider the
subject, the more expedient it appears to me, that the power of ordaining
others should be received by me from you, by the imposition of your
hands ; and that you should lay hands on brother Whatcoat and
brother Vasey, for the following reasons : (i) It seems to me the most
scriptural way, and most agreeable to the practice of the primitive
churches. (2) I may want all the influence, in America, which you can
throw into my scale. Mr. Brackenbury informed me at Leeds, that he
saw a letter from Mr. Asbury, in which he observed that he would not
receive any person, deputed by you, with any part of the superintendency
of the work invested in him ; or words which evidently implied so
much. I do not find the least degree of prejudice in my mind against
Mr. Asbury ; on the contrary, I find a very great love and esteem ; and
am determined not to stir a finger without his consent, unless necessity
obliges me ; but rather to be at his feet in all things. But, as the journey
is long, and you cannot spare me often, it is well to provide against all
events ; and I am satisfied that an authority, formally received from you,
will be fully admitted ; and that my exercising the office of ordination,
without that formal authority, may be disputed, and perhaps, on other
accounts, opposed. I think you have tried me too often to doubt, whether
I will, in any degree, use the power you are pleased to invest me with,
farther than I believe absolutely necessary for the prosperity of the work.
" In respect of my brethren Whatcoat and Vasey, it is very uncertain
whether any of the clergy, mentioned by brother Rankin, except Mr.
Jarratt, will stir a step with me in the work ; and it is by no means certain,
that even he will choose to join me in ordaining ; and propriety and
universal practice make it expedient, that I should have two presbyters
with me in this work. In short, it appears to me, that everything should
be prepared, and everything proper be done, that can possibly be done, on
this side the water. You can do all this in Mr. C n's house, in your
chamber ; and afterwards, (according to Mr. Fletcher's advice,) give us
letters testimonial of the different offices with which you have been
pleased to invest us. For the purpose of laying hands on brothers What-
coat and Vasey, I can bring Mr. Creighton down with me, by which you
will have two presbyters with you.
" In respect to brother Rankin's argument, that you will escape a great
deal of odium by omitting this, it is nothing. Either it will be known, or
not known. If not known, then no odium will arise ; but if known, you
will be obliged to acknowledge, that I acted under your direction, or suffer
me to sink under the weight of my enemies, with perhaps your brother
at the head of them. I shall entreat you to ponder these things.
" Your most dutiful, THOMAS COKE."'
'Whitehead's Life of Wesley, vol. ii., p. 417.
430 Z?)^ and Times of Wesley,
^784 Would it not seem from this, that Wesley had no
Age 81 idea of ordaining any one himself; but, that he intended
Coke, who, as a presbyter of the same church, had coequal
power, to go out to America for that purpose ? There can be
no question, that there is force in Dr. Whitehead's critique,
that " Dr. Coke had the same right to ordain Mr. Wesley,
that Mr. Wesley had to ordain Dr. Coke." Wesley, we
think, never intended doing this ; but, at Coke's request, he
acquiesced.
Of his power to ordain others, Wesley had no doubt.
Nearly forty years before this, he had been convinced, by
Lord King's Account of the Primitive Church, " that bishops
and presbyters are of one order." In 1756, he wrote : " I
still believe the episcopal form of church government, to agree
with the practice and writings of the apostles ; but, that it is
prescribed in Scripture, I do not believe. This opinion, which
I once zealously espoused, I have been heartily ashamed of,
ever since I read Bishop Stillingfleet's * Irenicon,* I think he
has unanswerably proved, that neither Christ nor His apostles
prescribe any particular form of church government ; and that
the plea of Divine right, for diocesan episcopacy, was never
heard of in the primitive church." 1 Again, in 1761, in a letter
to a friend, he repeated, that Stillingfleet had fully convinced
him, that to believe that none but episcopal ordination was
valid "was an entire mistake."^ And again, in 1780, he
shocked the high church bigotry of his brother, by declaring,
" I verily believe I have as good a right to ordain, as to
administer the Lord's supper." ^
His right to ordain, then, was no new assumption of
Wesley, adopted in his old age, or in his Imbecility, as some
of his critics have alleged. It was a firm conviction of forty
years' standing.
Besides, there was another fact, which might have some
influence with him, but which none of his biographers have
noticed. The Methodists, under the care of the Countess of
Huntingdon, stood in the same relation to the Church of
England that the Methodists under Wesley did. They varied,
* Wesley's Works, vol. xiii., p. 200. * Ibid. p. 223.
^ Ibid. vol. xii., p. 137.
Two Clci'gymcn become Dissentei's. 431
not dissented, from the Church. Recently, however, there ^784
had been a formal and avowed secession. Many of Lady Age 81
Huntingdon's chapels were supplied by ordained clergymen,
and, among others, a large building in Spafields, previously
known as the Pantheon. This edifice stood in the parish of
Clerkenwell, of which the Rev. William Sellon was minister.
Mr. Sellon claimed the right of appointing ministers and
clerks to the Spafields chapel ; also the right of himself
to officiate within its walls as often as he liked. He further
demanded the sum of ^^40 a year, in consideration of his per-
mitting two of the Countess's preachers to occupy the said
chapel ; also all the sacramental collections ; and four collec-
tions yearly, for the benefit of the children of the charity
school of Clerkenwell parish ; and, finally, that, for the due
performance of these demands, the proprietors should sign a
bond for ^lOOO.
Of course, the proprietors refused to comply with such
demands. Mr. Sellon then instituted a suit in the consistorial
court of the Bishop of London, and cited the Revs. Messrs.
Jones and Taylor, the ofiiciating clergymen, and both of them
ordained, to answer for their irregularity in preaching in a
place not episcopally consecrated, and for carrying on Divine
worship there, contrary to the wish of the minister of the
parish. Verdicts were obtained against them. The question
was then removed to the ecclesiastical courts ; and was again
decided against the ministers of the countess, and in favour
of Mr. Sellon, who obtained the name of Sanballat.
This was a momentous matter. Hitherto, Romaine, Venn,
and others had preached for the countess ; but now, as or-
dained clergymen, in danger of prosecution, they had to with-
draw their services ; and some of the most important chapels
were left without supplies. The crisis was serious. The
countess took counsel with her friends ; and, at length, it was
determined, that IMessrs. Wills and Taylor should formally
secede from the Church of England, and should take upon
themselves to ordain others : both of them had received
episcopal ordination themselves, both were scholars and able
preachers, and Mr. Wills had married Miss Wheeler, the
countess's niece. Accordingly, these two ministers issued an
address to the archbishops and bishops of the Church of
43 2 Life and Times of Wesley,
1784 England, stating that, because they could not, as clergymen of
Age 81 the Established Church, continue preaching to their present
congregations, without " knowingly and wilfully opposing the
Church's laws," they had resolved to secede peaceably, and to
put themselves under the protection of the Toleration Act.
Here then was a formal Methodist secession from the
Established Church. But more than this : on March 9,
1783, these two seceding clergymen begun to do what Wesley
did eighteen months afterwards, — they held their first ordina-
tion. This was in Spafields chapel. The service commenced
at 9 a.m., and lasted about seven hours. The names of the
six young men, then set apart to the Christian ministry, were
Thomas Jones, Samuel Beaufoy, Thomas Cannon, John John-
son, William Green, and Joel Abraham Knight. During the
service, Mr. Wills addressed the congregation, and assigned
his reasons for believing that he had the right to ordain,
namely, that presbyters and bishops were the same order, and
that, as he and Mr. Taylor had been ordained presbyters, they
had really been ordained bishops, and had as much right to
ordain others as any bishop in the land.^
Wesley was acquainted with all this, though he never men-
tions it. P^or aught he knew, an action might be commenced
against himself and the other clergymen preaching in City
Road, West Street, and elsewhere, similar to that which had
been successfully prosecuted against the Countess of Hunting-
don's preachers at Spafields. It was time to look about. He held
exactly the same views respecting presbyters and bishops that
had been publicly avowed by Messrs. Wills and Taylor ; and
now, in September 1784, reduced them to practice by proceed-
ing to Bristol, and there ordaining Coke, Whatcoat, and Vasey.
Passing by the ordinations of Whatcoat and Vasey, which
involve no difficulty except Wesley's churchmanship, the or-
dination of Coke is a perplexing puzzle. Coke had been
already ordained a deacon and a priest of the Church of
England ; and, hence, his ministerial status was the same as
Wesley's. What further ordination was needed .-* Wesley
intended none ; but Coke wished it.
* " Life and Times of Lady Huntingdon ; " and " Authentic Narrative
of Primary Ordination in Spafields Chapel, 1784."
Oi'dination of Pi^cachcrs foj" America. 433
Wesley was the founder and father of the Methodists. 1784
There were 15,000 in America whom he had never seen. In a~8i
no sense were these members of the Church of England ; for,
at the termination of the war, no state church was recognised.
What were they .'' Not presbyterians, not Dissenters, not
quakers, not anything, except simple Methodists. They
were without sacraments. They wished to have them.
As Christians, they had a right to them. But who was
to administer } Common sense would have said, the men
by whose preaching they had been converted ; but here
priestly prejudice stepped in, and forbad men, whom God
had called to preach, to administer the sacraments, until
episcopal or presbyterian hands had been put upon them.
Things were brought into a dead lock. The question was,
are the Methodist preachers in America to administer
the sacraments without ordination .-' Or shall Wesley or
some one else go from England to give them ordination .''
Wesley, a man of action, decided to send Coke, and Coke
consented ; but, before starting, he wished to have an
additional ordination himself What was that ordination to
be .'' The only one possible was this. Wesley was the vener-
able father of the 15,000 Methodists in America. He was not
able to visit them himself; but sends them Dr. Coke. The
doctor pretends, that it is more than possible, that some of
the American preachers and societies will refuse to acknow-
ledge his authority. To remove this objection, Wesley, at
Bristol, in a private room, holds a religious service, puts his
hands upon the head of Coke, and, (to use his own words,)
sets him apart as a siipcrintaidcnt of the work in America,
and gives him a written testimonial to that effect. This was
all that Wesley did, and all that Wesley meant ; but we
greatly doubt whether it was all that the departing envoy
wished.
With the highest respect for Dr. Coke, and his general
excellences, it is no detraction to assert, that he was
dangerously ambitious, and that the height of his ambition
was a desire to be a bishop. Some years after this. Coke,
unknown to Wesley and Asbury, addressed a confiden-
tial letter to Dr. White, bishop of the protestant episcopal
church of Pennsylvania, which, if it meant anything, meant
VOL. III. F F
434 Life and Times of Wesley.
1784 that he would Hke the Methodists of America to be reunited to
Age"8i the Enghsh Church, on condition that he himself was ordained
to be their bishop. In 1794, he secretly summoned a meeting,
at Lichfield, of the most influential of the English preachers,
and passed a resolution, that the conference should appoint
an order of bishops, to ordain deacons and elders, he himself,
of course, expecting to be a member of the prelatical brother-
hood. And again, it is a well known fact, that, within twelve
months of his lamented death, he wrote to the Earl of Liver-
pool, stating that he was willing to return most fully into the
bosom of the Established Church, on condition, that his
royal highness the Prince Regent, and the government,
would appoint him their bishop in India. These are un-
pleasant facts ; which we would rather have consigned to
oblivion, had they not been necessary to vindicate Wesley
from the huge inconsistency of ordaining a coequal presbyter
to be a bishop. Wesley meant the ceremony to be a mere
formality likely to recommend his delegate to the favour of
the Methodists in America: Coke, in his ambition, wished, and
intended it to be considered as, an ordination to a bishopric.
This will be clear as we proceed farther. The following are
the " letters testimonial," which Coke asked to have.
" To all to whom these presents shall come, John Wesley, late Fellow
of Lincoln College in Oxford, Presbyter of the Church of England,
sendeth greeting.
" Whereas many of the people in the southern provinces of North
America, who desire to continue under my care, and still adhere to the
doctrine and discipline of the Church of England, are greatly distressed
for want of ministers to administer the sacraments of baptism and the
Lord's supper, according to the usage of the same Church ; and whereas
there does not appear to be any other way of supplying them with
ministers :
" Know all men, that I, John Wesley, think myself to be providentially
called, at this time, to set apart some persons for the work of the ministry
in America. And, therefore, under the protection of almighty God, and
with a single eye to His glory, I have this day set apart as a superin-
tendent, by the imposition of my hands, and prayer, (being assisted by
other ordained ministers,') Thomas Coke, doctor of civil law, a presbyter
of the Church of England, and a man whom I judge to be well qualified
' The Rev. James Creighton was present ; but Charles Wesley was not,
though he was in Bristol at the time. — (Jackson's Life of C. Wesley,
vol. ii., p. 389.)
Oi'dination of Preachers for America. 435
for that great work. And I do hereby recommend him to all whom it 1784.
may concern, as a fit person to preside over the flock of Christ. In —
testimony whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal, this second Age 81
day of September, in the year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred
and eighty-four.
"John Wesley." '
" Bristol, September 10, 1784.
" To Dr. Coke, Mr. Asbiiry, and our Brethren in North America.
" By a very uncommon train of providences, many of the provinces of
North America are totally disjoined from the mother country, and
erected into independent states. The English government has no
authority over them, either civil or ecclesiastical, any more than over the
states of Holland. A civil authority is exercised over them, partly by
the congress, partly by the provincial assemblies. But no one either
exercises or claims any ecclesiastical authority at all. In this peculiar
situation, some thousands of the inhabitants of these states desire my
advice, and, in compliance with their desire, I have drawn up a little
sketch.
" Lord King's account of the primitive church convinced me, many
years ago, that bishops and presbyters are the same order, and conse-
quently have the same right to ordain. For many years, I have been
importuned, from time to time, to exercise this right, by ordaining part of
our travelling preachers. But I have still refused ; not only for peace
sake, but because I was- determined, as little as possible, to violate the
established order of the national church to which I belonged.
" But the case is widely diiTerent between England and North America,
Here there are bishops, who have a legal jurisdiction ; in America there
are none, neither any parish minister ; so that, for some hundreds of
miles together, there is none either to baptize, or to adtnmister the Lord's
supper. Here, therefore, my scruples are at an end ; and I conceive
myself at full liberty, as I violate no order, and invade no man's rights,
by appointing and sending labourers into the harvest.
" I have accordingly appointed Dr. Coke and Mr. Francis Asbury to
be joint superintendents over our brethren in North America ; as also
Richard Whatcoat and Thomas Vasey, to act as elders among them, by
baptizing and administenng the Lord's supper. And I have prepared a
liturgy, little differing from that of the Church of England, (I think the
best constituted national church in the world,) which I advise all the
travelling preachers to use on the Lord's day, in all the congregations,
reading the litany only on Wednesdays and Fridays, and praying extem-
pore on all other days. I also advise the elders to admmister the supper
of the Lord, on every Lord's day.
" If any one will point out a more rational and scriptural way of feeding
and guiding these poor sheep in the wilderness, I will gladly embrace it.
At present, I cannot see any better method than that I have taken.
* Drew's Life of Coke, p. 66.
43^ Life and Times of Wesley.
1784 " It has, indeed, been proposed to desire the EngHsh bishops to ordain
, \ part of our preachers for America. But to this I object: (i) I desired the
Bishop of London to ordain one, but could not prevail. (2) If they con-
sented, we know the slowness of their proceedings ; but the matter
admits of no delay. (3) If they would ordain them now, they would
expect to govern them ; and how grievously would this entangle us ! (4)
As our American brethren are now totally disentangled, both from the
state and the English hierarchy, we dare not entangle them again, either
with the one or the other. They are now at full liberty, simply to follow
the Scriptures and the primitive church. And we judge it best, that
they should stand fast in that liberty, wherewith God has so strangely set
t^^"'^^'^^- "JOHN Wesley."^
" These are the steps," says Wesley in another place,
"which, not of choice, but necessity, I have slowly and
deliberately taken. If any one is pleased to call this
separating from the ChnrcJi, he may. But the law of England
does not call it so ; nor can any one properly be said so to
do, unless, out of conscience, he refuses to join in the service,
and partake of the sacraments administered therein." ^
Eight days after the date of the above letter. Coke, What-
coat, and Vasey set sail for America, where they arrived on
November 3. A conference of nearly sixty preachers met in
Baltimore on December 24. Three days later. Coke ordained
Asbury ; and the two then ordained a number of elders and
deacons. Coke preached a sermon, which was published,
with the title, " The Substance of a Sermon preached at
Baltimore, in the State of Maryland, before the General
Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church, on the 27th
of December, 1784, at the Ordination of the Rev, Francis
Asbury to the office of Superintendent. By Thomas Coke,
LL.D., Superintendent of the said Church. Published at the
desire of the Conference." i2mo, 22 pages.
The title is worth observing. Coke and Asbury are super-
intendents ; the Methodist church is episeopal, — a church
governed by bishops. The sermon begins with an onslaught
on the Church of England in America. " The churches had,
in general, been filled with the parasites and bottle com-
panions of the rich and great. The humble and importunate
entreaties, of the oppressed flocks, were contemned and de-
* Methodist Magazine, 1785, p. 602. 2 jbid, 1786, p. 677.
Ordination of Preachers for America. 437
spised. The drunkard, the fornicator, and the extortioner, ^7^4
triumphed over bleeding Zion, because they were faithful Age 81
abettors of the ruling powers. But these intolerable fetters
were now struck off; and the antichristian union, which before
subsisted between church and state, was broken asunder."
Coke then proceeds to answer the question, "What right have
you to exercise the episcopal office.'" "To me,^' says he,
" the most manifest and clear. God has been pleased, by
Mr. Wesley, to raise up, in America and Europe, a numerous
society, well known by the name of Methodists. The whole
body have invariably esteemed this man as their chief pastor,
under Christ ; and we are fully persuaded, he has a right to
ordain. Besides, we have every qualification for an episcopal
church, which that of Alexandria possessed for two hundred
years ; our bishops, or superintendents (as we rather call
them), having been elected by the suffrages of the whole body
of our ministers through the continent, assembled in general
conference."
This is scarcely conclusive reasoning, but it shows that,
from the very first, Coke assumed, what Wesley never gave
him, the title of a bishop. Five years later, in May, 1789,
Coke and Asbury presented an address to Washington, the
president of the United States, beginning with the words,
"We, the bishops of the Methodist Episcopal Church";^ and
at the conference of the same year the first question asked
was : " Who are the persons that exercise the episcopal office
in the Methodist church in Europe and America .'' Answer.
John Wesley, Thomas Coke, and Francis Asbury, by regular
order and succession."^
This grandiloquent parade of office must net be ascribed to
Wesley. He never sanctioned it ; he positively condemned
it. Besides, even allowing that Coke and Asbury had a right
to designate themselves bishops of the IMethodist churches in
America, what was their authority for pronouncing Wesley
the bishop of the Methodist church in Europe .-* They had
none. It was an unwarrantable liberty taken with the name
of a venerable man, who had censured the use of such an
appellation, and whose humility and modesty Coke would
' Coke's Life, by Etheridge. ^ American minutes.
43^ Z?)^ and Tivies of Wesley.
1784 have been none the worse for copying. As it was, Wesley
Age 8i was held up to ridicule, and made to suffer, on account of the
episcopal ambition of his friends.
We have no fault to find with the American Methodists
being called the Methodist Episcopal Church. They have
the fullest right to such a designation if they choose to use it ;
but it was a name which Wesley never used ; and to censure
him for ordaining bishops is to censure him for what he never
did. He ordained a superintendent ; but he never thought to
call him bishop. Hence the following to Asbury.
" London, September 20, 1788.
". . . There is indeed a wide difference between the relation wherein
you stand to the Americans, and the relation wherein I stand to all the
Methodists. You are the elder brother of the American Methodists ; I
am, under God, the father of the whole family. Therefore, I naturally
care for you all in a manner no other person can do. Therefore, I, in a
measure, provide for you all; for the supplies which Dr. Coke provides
for you, he could not provide, were it not for me, — were it not that I not
only permit him to collect, but also support him in so doing.
"But in one point, my dear brother, I am a little afraid, both the doctor
and you differ from me. I study to be little ; you study to be great. I
creep; you strut along. I found a school; you a college ! nay, and call it
after your own names I' O, beware ; do not seek to be something ! Let
me be nothing, and ' Christ be all in all !'
" One instance of this, of your greatness, has given me great concern.
How can you, how dare you, suffer yourself to be called bishop? I
shudder, I start at the very thought ! Men may call me a knave or a fool,
a rascal, a scoundrel, and I am content ; but they shall never, by my
consent, call me bishop ! For my sake, for God's sake, for Christ's sake,
put a full end to this ! Let the presbyterians do what they please, but let
the Methodists know their calling better.
" Thus, my dear Franky, I have told you all that is in my heart. And
let this, when I am no more seen, bear witness how sincerely I am your
affectionate friend and brother,
"JohnWesley."2
Coke, in his letter, dated August 9, 1784, mentions the
"odium" which Wesley was likely to incur by the ordinations
which he himself was soliciting ; and, with a want of chivalry
not to be commended, requests Wesley to acknowledge that
the deed was all his own, otherwise Coke would " sink under
* Cokesbury college, twice burned down.
2 Wesley's Works, vol. xiii., p. 70.
Ordination of Preache7's for America. 439
the weight of his enemies, with Charles Wesley at the head ^7^4
of them." The apprehension was not unfounded. Charles Age 81
Wesley knew nothing of the ordinations in Bristol till they
were over ; but, of course, it was impossible to keep them
secret ; and great was the excitement which the revelation
created. One of the preachers wrote :
"Ordination among Methodists! Amazing indeed! Surely it never
began in the midst of a multitude of counsellors ; and, I greatly fear, the
Son of Man was not secretary of state, or not present, when the business
was brought on and carried. Who is the father of this monster, so long
dreaded by the father of his people, and by most of his sons? Whoever
he be, time will prove him to be a felon to Methodism, and discover his
assassinating knife sticking fast in the vitals of its body. Years to come
will speak in groans the opprobrious anniversary of our religious madness
for gowns and bands."
Another wrote : *' I wish they had been asleep when they
began this business of ordination : it is neither episcopal nor
prcsbytcrian ; but a mere hodge-podge of inconsistencies." ^
On April 28, 1785, Charles Wesley addressed a long letter
to Dr. Chandler, an episcopal clergyman, who was about to
embark for America, from which the following is an extract.
" I never lost my dread of separation, or ceased to guard our societies
against it. I frequently told them : ' I am your servant as long as you
remain in the Church of England; but no longer. Should you forsake
her, you would renounce me.'
" Some of the lay preachers very early discovered an inclination to
separate, which induced my brother to print his ' Reasons against Separa-
tion.' As often as it appeared, we beat down the schismatical spirit. If
any one did leave the Church, at the same time he left our society. For
near fifty years, we kept the sheep in the fold ; and, having filled the
number of our days, only waited to depart in peace.
" After our having continued friends for above seventy years, and fellow
labourers for above yf/?i', can anything but death part us ? I can scarcely
yet believe it, that, in his eighty-second year, my brother, my old, intimate
friend and companion, should have assumed the episcopal character,
ordained elders, consecrated a bishop, and sent him to ordain our lay
preachers in America ! I was then in Bristol, at his elbow ; yet he never
gave me the least hint of his intention. How was he surprised into so
rash an action ? He certainly persuaded himself that it was right,
" Lord Mansfield told me last year, that ordination was separation.
This my brother does not and will not see ; or that he has renounced the
* Whitehead's Life of Wesley, vol. ii., p. 419.
AgeSi
440 Life and Times of Wesley.
1784 principles and practice of his whole life ; that he has acted contrary to all
his declarations, protestations, and writings ; robbed his friends of their
boasting ; and left an indelible blot on his name, as long as it shall be
remembered !
" Thus our partnership here is dissolved, but not our friendship. I have
taken him for better for worse, till death do us part ; or, rather, reunite
us in love inseparable. I have lived on earth a little too long, who have
lived to see this evil day. But I shall very soon be taken from it, in
stedfast faith, that the Lord will maintain His own cause, and carry on
His own work, and fulfil His promise to His church, ' Lo, I am with
you always, even to the end !'
"What will become of these poor sheep in the wilderness, the American
Methodists ? How have they been betrayed into a separation from the
Church of England, which their preachers and they no more intended
than the Methodists here ! Had they had patience a little longer, they
would have seen a real bishop in America, consecrated by three Scotch
bishops, who have their consecration from the Enghsh bishops, and are
acknowledged by them as the same with themselves. There is, therefore,
not the least difference betwixt the members of Bishop Seabury's ' church,
and the members of the Church of England. He told me he looked upon
the Methodists in America as sound members of the Church, and was
ready to ordain any of their preachers whom he should find duly qualified.
His ordination would be indeed genuine, valid, and episcopal. But what
are your poor Methodists now? Only a new sect of presbyterians. And,
after my brother's death, which is now so near, what will be their end ?
They will lose all their influence and importance ; they will turn aside to
vain janglings; they will settle again upon their lees; and, like other sects
of Dissenters, come to nothing." ^
' Dr. Samuel Seabury was a missionary of the Society for the Propa-
gation of the Gospel. After the ratification of the treaty of peace, the
American episcopal church felt it necessary, not to remain dependent
on the good offices of a prelate residing in England, but to have
bishops of its own. Accordingly, the clergy in Connecticut assem-
bled in a voluntary convention, and elected Seabury. The election was
easily accomplished ; the consecration was more difficult, Seabury came
to England, asking of the archbishops of the English Church a boon
which, for a hundred and fifty years, had been asked in vain, namely,
that episcopalians in America might have ordained bishops of their own.
At the time, the see of Canterbury was vacant ; and the archbishop of
York was unable to take measures for the consecration of an American
citizen, without the authority of parliament. A long delay was unavoidable,
and, under the circumstances, Seabury proceeded to Scotland, where he
applied for consecration to the bishops of the Scottish episcopal church.
His application was granted, and he was solemnly ordained at Aberdeen,
on November 14, 1784, by the bishops of Aberdeen, Ross, and Moray. —
(Caswall's American Church, p. 124.) This Avill explain the meaning of
C. Wesley's letter ; but is it surprising that, amid all these changes, diffi-
culties, and confusions, Wesley took upon himself to ordain deacons and
presbyters for the abandoned Methodists of America .''
* Jackson's Life of C. Wesley, vol. ii., p. 392.
Ordinatio7t of Prcac/icrs for Scotland, &c. 44 1
Charles Wesley hints, that his brother was ''surprised 1784
into the rash act" of ordaining. Perhaps he was; but did a^Si
he afterwards regret it ? In answering this question, we must
use materials which properly belong to succeeding years.^
It is a fact, which cannot be denied, that, while Wesley
himself was, to some extent, welcomed in Scotland, by the
ministers of the kirk, the Methodists, in many instances,
were substantially in the same position as the Methodists in
America. There were, indeed, clergymen of the English
Church in Scotland ; but several of them absolutely refused
to admit the IMethodists to the sacraments, except on the
condition that they would renounce all future connection
wath the Methodist ministry and discipline.^ There was,
therefore, the same necessity to ordain for the one country
as for the other. Accordingly, Wesley, in his journal,
writes: "1785: August i — Having, with a few select
friends, weighed the matter thoroughly, I yielded to their
judgment, and set apart three of our well tried preachers,
John Pawson, Thomas Hanby, and Joseph Taylor, to minister
in Scotland." A year afterwards, at the conference of 1786,
he ordained Joshua Keighley and Charles Atmore, for Scot-
land ; William Warrener, for Antigua ; and William Hammet,
for Newfoundland. A year later, five others were ordained ;
in 1788, when Wesley was in Scotland, John Barber and
Joseph Cownley received ordination at his hands ; and, at the
ensuing conference, seven others, including Alexander ]\Iather,
who was ordained to the office, not only of deacon and elder,
but of superintendent. On Ash Wednesday in 1789, Wesley
ordained Henry Moore and Thomas Rankin ; and this, we
believe, completes the list of those upon whom Wesley laid
his hands. All these ordinations were in private ; and many
of them at four o'clock in the morning. Some of the favoured
ones were intended for Scotland ; some for foreign missions ;
^ The Rev. James Creighton, in his reply to Bradburn's pamphlet in
1793, affirms that Wesley repented, with tears, that he had ordained any
of his preachers. He states, that he expressed his sorrow for this at the
conference of 1789, and occasionally afterwards till his death. Creighton
adds : " About six weeks before he died, he said, ' The preachers are now
too powerful for me.'" This must pass for as much as it is worth ; James
Creighton was a clergyman.
^ Jackson's Life of C. Wesley, vol. ii., p. 3S2.
442 Life and Times of Wesley.
1784 and a few, as Mather, Moore, and Rankin, were employed in
_A.ge 81 England. In most instances, probably in all, they were
ordained deacons on one day ; and, on the day following, re-
ceived the ordination of elders, Wesley giving to each letters
testimonial.^ Wesley justified his ordinations for Scotland thus.
"After Dr. Coke's return from America, many of our friends begged I
I would consider the case of Scotland, where we had been labouring for
many years, and had seen so little fruit of our labours. Multitudes,
indeed, have set out well, but they were soon turned out of the way ; chiefly
by their ministers either disputing against the truth, or refusing to admit
them to the Lord's supper, yea, or to baptize their children, unless they
would promise to have no fellowship with the Methodists. Many, who did
so, soon lost all they had gained, and became more the children of hell
than before. To prevent this, I, at length, consented to take the same
step with regard to Scotland, which I had done with regard to America.
But this is not a separation from the Church at all. Not from the Church
of Scotland, for we were never connected therewith, any further than we
are now : nor from the Church of Enp-land; for this is not concerned in
the steps which are taken in Scotland, Whatever then is done in
America, or Scotland, is no separation from the Church of England. I
have no thought of this ; I have many objections against it. It is a totally
different case. ' But for all this, is it not possible there may be such a
separation after you are dead ?' Undoubtedly it is. But what I said at
our first conference above forty years ago, I say still : * I dare not omit
doing what good I can while I live, for fear of evils that may follow when
I am dead.' " »
There is some force in this, so far as it regards Scotland.
The Scotch Methodists never professed themselves to be
members of the Church of England ; in fact, they regarded
that church almost with as much abhorrence as they cherished
towards the Church of Rome. Hence the following extract
from one of Pawson's unpublished letters, dated " Edinburgh,
October 8, 1785."
" Dr. Coke intends to be \vith us on Sunday, the 23rd instant, when we
are to have the sacrament again ; but Mr. Wesley is against us having it
in the Scotch form, and I am well satisfied our new plan will answer no
end at all in Scotland, but will prove a hindrance to the work of God.
The people generally hate the very name of Prayer-Book, and everything
belonging to it, as they have always been taught to believe it a limb of
antichrist, and very little better than the popish mass-book. Popery,
' Manuscripts; also Methodist Magazine, 1867, p. 622.
2 Methodist Magazine, 1*786, p. 678.
Letters on Wesley s Ordinations. 443
prelacy, and all such things, they hold in the greatest detestation. They 1784
would soon tell us: 'I dunna ken what you mean by these unca inventions.
We belong to the gude old kirk of Scotland, and will not join with the
whore of Babylon at all.' "
In reference to the English ordinations, Mr, Pawson
writes :
" Mr. Wesley knew the state of the societies in England required such
measures to be taken, or many of the people would leave the connexion ;
and had the preachers, after his death, only acted upon his plan,
and quietly granted the people, who desired the sacraments, that privi-
lege, no division would have taken place.* He foresaw, that the
]\Iethodists would soon become a distinct body. He was deeply pre-
judiced against presbyterian, and as much in favour of episcopal,
government. In order, therefore, to preserve all that is valuable in the
Church of England among the Methodists, he ordained Mr. Mather and
Dr. Coke, bishops. These he undoubtedly designed should ordain
others. Mr. Mather told us so at the Manchester conference, in 1 791.2 \
believe, Mr. Wesley's first thought of ordaining arose out of the bishop
of London refusing to ordain a preacher for America ; but that he
originally intended to ordain preachers for England is what I never
could believe ; and, with respect to Scotland, he often declared to
me, and in the congregation at Edinburgh, that he was over per-
suaded to it. And, a few months before his death, he was so annoyed
with Dr. Coke's conduct, in persuading the people to depart from the
original plan, that he threatened, in a letter, to have no more to do with
him, unless he desisted from such a course of procedure."^
We give this as we find it ; and now turn to a- deeply-
interesting correspondence between Wesley and his brother.
Within a fortnight after the ordination of Pawson, Hanby,
and Taylor, at the conference of 1785, and in which Wesley,
Coke, and Creighton took part/ Charles Wesley wrote to his
brother as follows.
"Bristol, August 14, 1785.
" Dear Brother, — I have been reading over again your ' Reasons
against a Separation,' printed in 1758, and your Works; and
entreat you, in the name of God, and for Christ's sake, to read them
again yourself, with previous prayer, and stop, and proceed no farther,
till you receive an answer to your inquiry, 'Lord, what wouldst Thou have
me to do ?'
" Every word of your eleven pages deserves the deepest consideration ;
* Manuscript memoir of Whitehead. '^ Manuscript letter.
* Manuscript letter. '♦Pawson's manuscript.
Age Si
444 Life and Times of Wesley.
1784 not to mention my testimony and hymns. Only the seventh I could wish
— ' you to read, — a prophecy which I pray God may never come to pass.
^^ '' Near thirty years, since then, you have stood against the importunate
solicitations of your preachers, who have scarcely at last prevailed. I
was your natural ally, and faithful friend ; and, while you continued
faithful to yourself, we two could chase a thousand.
" But w'hen once you began ordaining in America, I knew, and you
knew, that your preachers here would never rest till you ordained them.
You told me, they would separate by-and-by. The doctor tells us the
same. His Methodist episcopal church in Baltimore was intended to
beget a Methodist episcopal church here. You know he comes, armed
with your authority, to make us all Dissenters. One of your sons assured
me, that not a preacher in London would refuse orders from the
doctor.
"Alas ! what trouble are you preparing for yourself, as well as for me,
and for your oldest, truest, and best friends ! Before you have quite
broken down the bridge, stop, and consider ! If your sons have no regard
for you, have some regard for yourself. Go to your grave in peace ; at
least, suffer me to go first, before this ruin is under your hand. So much,
I think, you owe to my father, to my brother, and to me, as to stay till I
am taken from the evil. I am on the brink of the grave. Do not push
me in, or embitter my last moments. Let us not leave an indehble blot
on our memory ; but let us leave behind us the name and character of
honest men.
" This letter is a debt to our parents, and to our brother, as well as to
you, and to
" Your faithful friend,
"Charles Wesley."'
Five days afterwards, Wesley replied as follows. The line
of poetry was his brother's.
" Plymouth, August 19, 1785.
" Dear Brother, — I will tell you my thoughts with all simplicity,
and wait for better information. If you agree with me, well ; if not, we
can, as Mr. Whitefield used to say, agree to disagree.
" For these forty years, I have been in doubt concerning that question,
What obedience is due to
* Heathenish priests and mitred infidels'?
" I have, from time to time, proposed my doubts to the most pious and
sensible clergymen I knew. But they gave me no satisfaction. Rather,
they seemed to be puzzled as well as me.
" Obedience I always paid to the bishops, in obedience to the laws of
the land. But I cannot see, that I am under any obligation to obey them
further than those laws require,
' Jackson's Life of C. Wesley, vol. ii., p. 394.
Letters on Wesley s Ordinations. 445
"It is in obedience to these laws, that I have never exercised in Eng- I7°4
hmd the power which, I beheve, God has given me. I firmly believe, I ^„g gj
am a scriptural fTrio-KOTrof, as much as any man in England, or in
Europe ; for the uninterrupted succession I know to be a fable, which no
man ever did or can prove. But this does in no wise interfere with my
remaining in the Church of England, from which I have no more desire
to separate than I had fifty years ago. I still attend all the ordinances of
the Church, at all opportunities ; and I constantly and earnestly advise
all that are connected with me so to do. When Mr. Smyth pressed us to
separate from the Church, he meant, ' Go to church no more.' And this
was what I meant twenty-seven years ago, when I persuaded our brethren
not to separate from the Church.
"But here another question occurs: 'What is the Church of England?'
It is not all the people of England. Papists and Dissenters are no part
thereof. It is not all the people of England, except papists and Dissenters.
Then we should have a glorious church indeed ! No ; according to our
twentieth article, a particular church is ' a congregation of faithful people
among whom the word of God is preached, and the sacraments duly
administered.' Here is a true logical definition, containing both the
essence and the properties of a church. What then, according to this
definition, is the Church of England? Does it mean all the believers in
England (except the papists and Dissenters) who have the word of God
and the sacraments duly administered among them ? I fear, this does not
come up to your idea of the Church of England. Well, what more do
you include in the phrase ? 'Why, all the believers that adhere to the
doctrine and discipline established by the convocation under Queen Eliza-
beth.' Nay, that discipline is well-nigh vanished away ; and the doctrine
both you and I adhere to.
" All these * Reasons against a Separation from the Church,' in this
sense, I subscribe to still. What then are you frighted at ? I no more
separate from it now than I did in 1758. I submit still (though sometimes
with a doubting conscience) to ' mitred infidels.' I do, indeed, vary from
them in some points of doctrine, and in some points of discipline (by
preaching abroad, for instance, by praying extempore, and by forming
societies) ; but not a hair's breadth farther than I believe to be meet,
right, and my bounden duty. I walk still by the same rule I have done
for between forty and fifty years. I do nothing rashly. It is not likely I
should. The high day of my blood is over. If you will go on hand in hand
with me, do. But do not hinder me, if you will not help. Perhaps if you
had kept close to me, I might have done better. However, with or with-
out help, I creep on ; and as I have been hitherto, so I trust I shall
always be,
" Your affectionate friend and brother,
"John Wesley."*
' Methodist Magazine, 1 786, p. 50.
44^ Life and Times of Wesley.
ijZ^ To this letter Charles Wesley returned the following
Age 8i reply.
" Marylebone, September 8, 1785.
" Dear Brother, — I will tell you my thoughts with the same
simplicity. There is no danger of our quarrelling ; for the second blow
makes the quarrel ; and you are the last man upon earth whom I would
wish to quarrel with.
" That juvenile line of mine,
'Heathenish priests, and mitred infidels,'
I disown, renounce, and with shame recant. I never knew of more than
one 'mitred infidel,' and for him I took Mr. Law's word.
" I do not understand what obedience to the bishops you dread. They
have let us alone, and left us to act just as we pleased, for these fifty
years. At present, some of them are quite friendly toward us, particularly
toward you. The churches are all open to you ; and never could there
be less pretence for a separation.
" That you are a scriptural enivKonos, or overseer, I do not dispute.
, And so is every minister who has the cure of souls. Neither need we
dispute whether the uninterrupted succession be fabulous, as you believe ;
or real, as I believe ; or whether Lord King be right or wrong.
" Your definition of the Church of England is the same in prose with
mine in verse. By the way, read over my ' Epistle,' to oblige me, and
tell me you have read it, and likewise your own ' Reasons.'
" You write, * all these reasons against a separation from the Church, I
subscribe to still. What then are you frighted at ? I no more separate
from it than I did in the year 1758 ; I submit still to its bishops ; I do
indeed vary from them in some points of discipline ; (by preaching
abroad, for instance, praying extempore, and by forming societies ') ;
(might you not add, and by ordaining?) ' 1 still walk by the same rule I
have done for between forty and fifty years; I do nothing rashly.'
" If I could prove your actual separation, I would not ; neither wish to
see it proved by any other. But do you not allow, that the doctor has
separated 1 Do you not know and approve of his avowed design and
resolution to get all the Methodists of the three kingdoms into a distinct,
compact body ? Have you seen his ordination sermon ? Is the high day
of his blood over ? Does he do nothing rashly ? Have you not made
yourself the author of all his actions .'' I need not remind you, qidfacit
per alitim facit per se.
"I must not leave unanswered your surprising question, * What then
are you frighted at ?' At the doctor's rashness, and your supporting him
in his ambitious pursuits ; at an approaching schism, as causeless and
unprovoked as the American rebellion; at your own eternal disgrace, and
all those frightful evils which your 'Reasons' describe.
"' If you will go on hand in hand with me, do.' I do go, or rather
creep on, in the old way in which we set out together, and trust to con-
tinue in it, till I finish my course.
Letters on Wesley s Ordinations. 447
"'Perhaps if you had kept dose to me, I might have done better.' 1784
When you took that fatal step at Bristol, I kept as close to you as close . "„
could be ; for I was all the time at your elbow. You might certainly have
done better, if you had taken me into your counsel.
" I thank you for your intention to remain my friend ; herein my heart
is as your heart ; whom God hath joined let not man put asunder. We
have taken each other for better for worse, till death do us — part ? No ;
but unite eternally. Therefore, in the love which never faileth, I am your
affectionate friend and brother,
" Charles Wesley."^
Five days later, Wesley replied.
" Sepietnber 13, 1785.
"Dear Brother, — I see no use of you and me disputing together;
for neither of us is likely to convince the other. You say, I separate from
the Church ; I say, I do not. Then let it stand.
" Your verse is a sad truth. I see fifty times more of England than
you do ; and I find few exceptions to it.
" I believe Dr. Coke is as free from ambition as from covetousness.
He has done nothing rashly, that I know ; but he has spoken rashly,
which he retracted the moment I spoke to him of it. To publish, as his
present thoughts, what he had before retracted, was not fair play. He is
now such a right hand to me as Thomas Walsh was. If you will not or
cannot help me yourself, do not hinder those that can and will. I must
and will save as many souls as I can while I live, without being careful
about what may possibly be when I die.
" I pray do not confound the intellects of the people in London. You
may thereby a little weaken my hands, but you will greatly weaken your
own. " I am, etc.,
"John Wesley."2
Wesley failed to grapple with his brother's question ; or
rather he declined. Charles's point evidently was the same as
Lord Mansfield's, — " ordination was separation." No doubt
this was strictly accurate. Wesley was too keen sighted not
to see it ; but he was too much a churchman to acknowledge
it. He felt himself unable to reply to his brother's argument ;
and, therefore, really did not attempt to reply at all.
Two brief letters more, and then we quit the subject of
ordination. Six days after the date of the above, Charles
W'esley replied as follows.
" London, September 19, 1785.
" Dear Brother, — I did not say, you separate from the Church; but
I did say, * If I could prove it, I would not.'
» C. Wesley's Life, vol. ii., p. 398. . 2 jbid.
44'^ Life and Times of Wesley.
1784 " That ' sad truth' is not a new truth; you saw it when you expressed
^r~Oj in your ' Reasons' such tenderness of love for the unconverted clergy.
" Of your second Thomas Walsh we had better talk than write.
" How 'confound their intellects' ? how 'weaken your hands '? I know
nothing which I do to prevent the possible separation, but pray. God
forbid I should sin against Him by ceasing to pray for the Church of
England; and for you, while my breath remains in me !
" I am, your affectionate brother,
" Charles WESLEy." '
Again :
" Bristol, July 27, 1786.
" Dear Brother, — I cannot rest, living or dying, unless I deal as
faithfully with you as I am persuaded you would deal with me, if you were
in my place, and I in yours.
" I believe you have been too hasty in ordaining. I believe God left
you to yourself in that matter, as He left Hezekiah, to show you the
secret pride M'hich was in your heart. I believe Lord Mansfield's decisive
words to me, * ordination is separation.'
"Thus I have discharged my duty to God and His church, and ap-
proved myself your faithful friend and affectionate brother,
" Charles Wesley.''^
This is a long, and, we fear, a wearisome account of what,
abstractedly considered, was a trivial thing. John Wesley's
preachers, being called of God, were as much ministers of
Christ, and as much entitled to administer the sacraments of
the church, without the imposition of his hands as with it.
We raise no objection to the formality ; we think it right,
and, because of its solemnity, likely to be useful ; but to con-
tend that the thing itself is necessary, would be to condemn
all the grand old Methodist preachers, who flourished from
the year 1795, when their administration of sacraments was
authorised by the Methodist conference, to the year 1836,
when, for the first time, ordination by imposition of hands
was solemnly enacted, and declared to be a " standing rule
and usage in future years."
This, however, is not the point in question. The right or
wrong, of ordaining, is left to others to discuss. There can be
no doubt that, as a minister of Christ, Wesley had as much
right to ordain as any bishop, priest, or presbytery in exist-
ence ; but he had no right to this as a clergyman of the
^ C. Wesley's Life, vol. ii., p. 398.
2 Methodist Magazine, 1867, p. 625.
Wesley a Dissenter. 449
Church of England; and, by acting as he did, he became, 1784
what he was unwilHng to acknowledge, a Dissenter, a sepa- AseSi
ratist from that church. Such was the opinion of Lord
Mansfield ; and such was the argument of Wesley's brother.
Wesley refused to acknowledge this ; but, feeling the impos-
sibility of the thing, he declined to attempt refuting it. With
great inconsistency, he still persisted in calling himself a
member of the Church of England ■} and, as will be seen,
to the day of his death, told the Methodists that if they
left the Church they would leave him. All things con- •
sidered, this was not surprising; but it was absurd. Great
allowance must be made for Wesley ; but to reconcile
Wesley's practice and profession, in this matter, during the
last seven years of his eventful life, is simply impossible.
Much space has been occupied with these recitals ; but,
remembering that no event, in Wesley's history, has
occasioned more controversy than his act of ordaining
preachers, it became a duty to give all the facts concerning it
within our knowledge.
We now return to the conference of 1784. As soon as its
sessions ended, Wesley again set out on his evangelistic
ramblings ; and, two days afterwards, came to Shrewsbury,
and preached a funeral sermon " in memory of good John
Appleton." John was a currier, and became a Methodist
under circumstances somewhat peculiar, and which are worth
relating.
While at Bristol, he happened to go into a church, where
the minister preached a violent sermon, which he had already
delivered in two other churches, against " the upstart Method-
ists." Shortly after, he had to preach again in the church of
St. Nicholas, but, while announcing his text, was suddenly
seized with a rattling in his throat, fell backward against the
^ Let us suppose John Hampson,not only to have formed societies, dif-
ferent from the Methodist societies, but also to have ordained local
preachers to administer to them the sacraments ; and let us suppose
further, that, despite this, John Hampson still persisted in calling him-
self a Methodist: and we have a case analogous to that of Wesley.
Under such circumstances, would Wesley have admitted Hampson's
claim to continued membership among the Methodists? We trow not ;
and yet this is exactly the sort of claim which he himself makes in
reference to the Church of England.
VOL. in. G G
450 Life and Times of Wesley,
1784 pulpit door, rolled down the steps, was carried home, and
Age 8i died. Mr. Appleton was present, and was so greatly shocked
with this event, that, when he returned to Shrewsbury, he
took a house, in which he fitted up a room for religious service,
and began to preach himself. In 1781, at his own expense,
he built the Methodists a chapel, which Wesley opened. A
more devoted Christian it would be difficult to find than good
John Appleton. His labour, as a working currier, was hard;
but, for many years, besides preaching every Sunday, he
preached twice a week on the week days, and had full and
attentive congregations. He died in the full triumph of
faith on the ist of May, 1784.'
From Shrewsbury, Wesley made his way, through Wales,
to Bristol, which he reached on August 29, and where, a
few days afterwards, he ordained Coke, Whatcoat, and Vasey.
The next month was spent in incessant preaching in the
surrounding neighbourhood.
Here we pause to insert two of his remarkable letters :
the first to Miss Bishop, the mistress of a boarding school ;
the second to the Right Hon. William Pitt, now in the
twenty-fifth year of his age, and prime minister of
England.
" Haverfordwest, August 18, 1784.
" My dear Sister, — It seems God Himself has already decided the
question concerning dancing. He has shown His approbation of your
conduct, by sending these children to you again. If dancing be not evil
in itself, yet, it leads young women to numberless evils. And the hazard
of these, on the one side, seems far to overbalance the little inconveni-
ences, on the other. Therefore, thus much may certainly be said, you
have chosen the more excellent way.
" I would recommend very few novels to young persons, for fear they
should be desirous of more. Mr. Brooke wrote one more, beside the
' Earl of Moreland,' ' The History of the Human Heart.' I think, it is
well worth reading, though it is not equal to his former production. The
want of novels may be more than supplied by well chosen history : such
as 'The Concise History of England,' 'The Concise History of the
Church,' Rollin's Ancient History, Hooke's Roman History (the only
impartial one extant), and a few more. For the elder and more sensible
children, Malebranche's ' Search after Truth 'is an excellent French book.
Perhaps, you might add Locke's ' Essay on the Human Understanding,'
with the remarks upon it in the Arminiaii Magazine. I had forgotten
* Methodist Magazine, 1 790, p. 636.
AgeSi
Wesley s Letter to William Pitt. 451
that beautiful book, 'The Travels of Cyrus,' whether in French or 1784
English.
" I always am your affectionate friend and brother,
"John Wesley."'
The letter to Pitt was one such as prime ministers seldom
get.
" Bath, September 6, 1 784.
"Sir, — Your former goodness, shown to Mr. Ellison,^ emboldens me
to take the liberty of recommending to your notice an old friend, Lieu-
tenant Webb.^
" On my mentioning formerly some of his services to Lord North, his
lordship was pleased to order him ^100 a year. But as it has since been
reduced, it is hardly a maintenance for himself and his family. If you
would be so good as to remember him in this, or any other way, I should
esteem it a particular favour.
" Will you excuse me, sir, for going out of my province by hinting a few
things, which have been long upon my mind? If those hints do not
deserve any further notice, they may be forgiven and forgotten.
" New taxes must undoubtedly be imposed ; but may not more money
be produced by the old ones ? For instance :
" I. When the land tax is four shillings in the pound, I know some towns
which pay regularly seven or five pence. Nay, I know one town where
they pay one penny in the pound. Is there no help for this ?
"2. As to the window tax : I know a gentleman who has near a
hundred windows in his house, and he told me he paid for twenty.
" 3. The same gentleman told me : ' We have above one hundred men
servants in this town, but not above ten are paid for.'
"4. I firmly believe, that, in Cornwall alone, the king is defrauded of
half a million yearly in customs. What does this amount to in all
Great Britain ? Surely not so little as five millions.
" 5. Servants of distillers inform me, that their masters do not pay for a
fortieth part of what they distil. And this duty last year, (if I am rightly
informed,) amounted only to ^20,000. But have not the spirits distilled
this year cost 20,000 lives of his majesty's liege subjects ? Is not then
the blood of these men vilely bartered for ^20,000 ? not to say anything
of the enormous wickedness, which has been occasioned thereby ; and
not to suppose that these poor wretches have any souls ! But, (to consider
money alone,) is the king a gainer, or an immense loser? To say nothing
of many millions of quarters of corn destroyed, which, if exported, would
have added more than ;/^2o,ooo to the revenue, be it considered, ' Dead
men pay no taxes.' So that, by the death of 20,000 persons yearly, (and
1 Methodist Magazine, 1807, p. 472 ; and Wesley's Works, vol. xiii.,
p. 36.
2 Wesley's nephew, an excise officer (Clarke's " Wesley Family," vol.
ii., p. 273).
3 Commonly called Captain Webb.
Age
452 Life and Thnes of Wesley.
1784 this computation is far under the mark,) the revenue loses far more than
it gains.
" But I may urge another consideration to you. You are a man. You
have not lost human feelings. You do not love to drink human blood.
You are a son of Lord Chatham. Nay, if I mistake not, you are a
Christian. Dare you then sustain a sinking nation ? Is the God whom
you serve able to deliver from ten thousand enemies ? I beheve He
is. Nay, and you believe it. O, may you fear nothing but displeasing
Him!
" May I add a word on another head ? How would your benevolent
heart rejoice, if a stop could be put to that scandal of the English nation,
suicide !
" The present laws against it avail nothing ; for every such murderer is
brought in non compos. If he was a poor man, the jurors forswear them-
selves from pity. If he was rich, they hope to be well paid for it. So no
ignominy pursues either the living or the dead, and self murder increases
daily. But what help ?
" I conceive this horrid crime might be totally prevented, and that
without doing the least hurt to either the living or the dead. Do you not
remember, sir, how the rage for self murder among the Spartan matrons
was stopped at once ? Would it not have the same effect in England, if
an act of parliament were passed, repealing all other acts and appointing
that every self murderer should be hanged in chains ?
" Suppose your influence could prevent suicide by this means, you
would do more service to your country than any prime minister has done
these hundred years. Your name would be precious to all true English-
men as long as England continued a nation. And, what is infinitely
more, a greater Monarch than King George would say to you, ' Well
done, good and faithful servant.' I earnestly commit you to His care, and
am, sir, your willing servant,
"John Wesley." ^
Methodism was established not only in America, but also
in Nova Scotia and Newfoundland, though neither of these
countries found a place in the conference minutes till 1785.
William Black, now a young man of twenty-four, had begun
to pray and preach, and had witnessed the conversion of
hundreds. Societies had been formed ; and quarterly meet-
ings held ; and, for three years, Black had devoted himself
wholly to the work of the ministry, without being formally
recognised as one of Wesley's itinerant preachers. He had
encountered no ordinary difficulties in the prosecution of his
work. The Rev. Henry Alline, a Calvinist preacher, had
'^Methodist Magazine, 1850, p. 161.
Letters to Williarn Black. 453
o
divided his societies, by sowinf^ the seeds of antinomian error; 1784
and Methodist meetings had been illegally disturbed, and AgeSi
broken up, by English soldiers : but, in the midst of all,
young Black courageously persevered. He applied to Wesley
for assistance ; and he himself expressed a wish to come to
Kingswood school to fit himself more fully for the Christian
ministry. During the year 1784, Weslby addressed to him
the two following letters.
" Inverness, May ir, 1784.
" My dear Brother, — I am glad you have given a little assistance
to our brethren at Halifax, and along the coast. There is no charity
under heaven to be compared to this, — the bringing light to the poor
heathens, that are called Christians, but, nevertheless, still sit in darkness
and the shadow of death. I am in great hopes, that some of the emigrants,
from New York, are really alive to God. And, if so, they will every way
be a valuable acquisition to the province where their lot is now cast.
'•'There is no part of Calvinism or antmomianism which is not fully
answered in some part of our writings ; particularly in the ' Preservative
against Unsettled Notions in Religion.' I have no more to do with
answering books. It will be sufficient if you recommend, to Mr. Alline's
friends, some of the tracts that are already written. As to himself, I fear
he is wiser in his own eyes than seven men that can render a reason.
" The work of God goes on with a steady pace in various parts of
England. But, still, the love of many will wax cold, while many others
are continually added to supply their place. In the west of England, in
Lancashire, and in Yorkshire, God still mightily makes bare His arm.
He convinces many, justifies many, and many are perfected in love.
" My great advice to those who are united together, is, Let brotherly
love continue ! See that ye fall not out by the way ! Hold the unity of
the Spirit in the bond of peace ! Bear ye one another's burdens, and so
fulfil the law of Christ !
I am, your affectionate brother,
"John Wesley." *
a
"London, October 15, 1784,
" My dear Brother, — A letter of yours, some time ago, gave me
hopes of meeting you in England ; as you seemed desirous of spending
some time here, to improve yourself in learning. But, as you have now
entered into a different state, I do not expect we shall meet in this world.
But you have a large field of action where you arc, without wandering
into Europe. Your present parish is wide enough, namely. Nova Scotia
and Newfoundland. I do not advise you to go any farther. In the
United States, there are abundance of preacher?. They can spare four
Black's Memoirs, p. ii2.
AgeSi
454 Life a7id Times of Wesley.
1 784 preachers to you, better than you can spare one to them. If I am rightly
informed, they have already sent you one or two ; and they may afford
you one or two more, if it please God to give a prosperous voyage to Dr.
Coke and his fellow labourers. Does there not want a closer and more
direct connection between you of the north, and the societies under
Francis Asbury? Is it not more advisable, that you should have a
constant correspondence with each other, and act by united counsels.''
Perhaps it is for want of this, that so many have drawn back. I want a
more particular account of the societies in Nova Scotia and Newfound-
land. I am not at all glad of Mr. Scurr's intention to remove from Nova
Scotia to the south. That is going from a place, where he is much
wanted, to a place where he is not wanted. I think, if he got ;^io,ooo
thereby, it would be but a poor bargain ; that is, upon the supposition,
which you and I make, that souls are of more value than gold. Peace be
with all your spirits !
" I am, your affectionate brother,
" John Wesley." '
Wesley returned to London on October 9, and, nine days
afterwards, set out on his usual visit to the societies in Oxford-
shire. He then went off to Norfolk; and spent the rest of
the year in London, and the surrounding counties. He had
a long interview with Pascal Paoli, the great Corsican general.
He visited convicts, under sentence of death, in Newgate,
preached the condemned criminals' sermon, forty-seven of
these unhappy creatures being present, all in chains, and most
of them in tears. Burglars broke into his house, in City Road.
He met with Simeon, who had been with Fletcher at Madeley,
and, for fifty-three years afterwards, was rector of Trinity
church, Cambridge. Jottings like these might be multi-
plied ; Wesley's life was full of them. We conclude with an
unpublished letter to Henry Moore, who was now at Dublin.
" London, November 4, 1 784.
"My dear Brother, — I am glad you spoke freely to Mr. Collins.
He is a good man, but not very adviseable. If he should declare open
war in England, he will do little or no harm. Mr. Smyth will not be fond
of him, if he preaches at Plunkett Street.^ There will not soon be a
coalition between Arminianism and Calvinism. This we found even in
Holland.
' Black's Memoirs, p. 126.
^ The Rev. Edward Smyth was about to become minister of Bethesda
chapel, Dublin. The Rev, Brian Collins seems to have been in Dublin
at the same time.
V/esieys Publications^ in 1784. 455
" If James Rogers and you keep to the Church still, a few, I doubt not, 1784
will follow your example. We made just allowance enough for leaving .""o
the Church at the last conference. "
" I am, with kind love to Nancy, yours affectionately,
"John Wesley."
Besides " The Sunday Service of the Methodists in
America," and a tract or two, Wesley pubHshed nothing-, in
1784, except his Arminian Magazine. This was as racy and
rich as ever. " The Calvinist Cabinet Unlocked " was con-
tinued from the previous volume, and run through the whole
of this. Like its predecessors, it contained six original
sermons by Wesley himself. In that on Dissipation, he
expresses the startling opinion : " There is not, on the face
of the earth, another nation so perfectly dissipated and
ungodly as England ; not only so totally without God in the
w^orld, but so openly setting Him at defiance. There never
was an age, that we read of in history, since Julius Caesar,
since Noah, since Adam, wherein dissipation and ungodliness
did so generally prevail, both among high and low, rich and
poor." In the sermon on Patience, he gives an interesting
account of the way in which he was led to embrace the
doctrine of Christian perfection; and observes that, in 1762,
there were 652 members of the London society, who pro-
fessed to have attained to this state of grace. That on the
text, " We know in part," is a marvellous production, such
as none but a man like Wesley could have written. In the
sermon on the " Wisdom and Knowledge of God," as dis-
played in the history of the church, after giving one of
his most interesting accounts of the rise of Methodism,
he does not hide the fact, that many of the Methodist
preachers and people had not been faithful. Speaking of
the first preachers, he says, they "were young, poor, igno-
rant men, without experience, learning, or art ; but simple
of heart, devoted to God, full of faith and zeal, seeking no
honour, no profit, no pleasure, no ease, but merely to save
souls ; fearing neither want, pain, persecution, nor whatever
man could do unto them : yea, not counting their lives dear
unto them, so they might finish their course with joy." But
in process of time, " several of the preachers increased in
other knowledge ; but not proportionably in the knowledge
45^ Life and Times of Wesley.
1784 of God. They grew less simple, less alive to God, and less
Age 81 devoted to Him. They were less zealous for God, and
consequently less active, less diligent in His service. Some
of them begun to desire the praise of men, and not the
praise of God only ; some, to be weary of a wandering life,
and to seek ease and quietness. Some began to fear the
faces of men ; to be ashamed of their calling ; to be un-
willing to deny themselves, to take up their cross daily,
and endure hardness as good soldiers of Jesus Christ.
Wherever these preachers laboured, there was not much
fruit of their labours. Their word was not, as formerly,
clothed with power; it- carried with it no demonstration of
the Spirit!" Weighty words these! especially as coming
from an old man of more than eighty, one of the keenest
observers of facts, himself the founder of Methodism, now
nearly at the close of his remarkable career. And equally
pungent are his remarks respecting the people. Referring
to the causes of Methodist backslidings, he writes : " But of
all the temptations, none so struck at the whole work of God,
as the deceitfulness of riches ; a thousand melancholy proofs
of which I have seen, within these last fifty years. I have not
known threescore rich persons, perhaps not half the number,
during threescore years, who, as far as I can judge, were not
less holy than they would have been, had they been poor. By
riches, I mean not thousands of pounds ; but any more than
will procure the conveniences of life." " Having gained and
saved all you can, give all you can : else your money will eat
your flesh as fire, and will sink you to the nethermost hell !
O beware of laying up treasures upon earth ! Is it not trea-
suring up wrath against the day of wrath .-' Lord ! I have
warned them : but if they will not be warned, what can I do
more .-' I can only give them up unto their own hearts' lusts,
and let them follow their own imaginations ! By not taking
this warning, it is certain many of the Methodists are already
fallen. Many are falling at this very time. And there is
great reason to apprehend, that many more will fall, most of
whom will rise no more ! " If Wesley found it necessary to
say this in 1784, what would he have said in 1871 t
In the sermons, on Obedience to Parents, and Companion-
ship with the Wicked, the reader will find most valuable
Wesley s PublicatmiSy in 1784. 457
advices, such as none but a longj experienced casuist like 1784
Wesley has wisdom and confidence enough to give. Age 81
Further' description of the Magazine, for 1784, is scarcely
needed. The letters and the poetry are quite equal to those
in the former volumes ; the biographies are rich in Christian
experience ; the anecdotes quaint and instructive. Extracts
from his " Natural Philosophy " are given in every number,
and also from Bryant's Ancient Mythology. Benson's Letters
on Polygamy run through the whole. The supernatural dis-
turbances at Epworth parsonage are related ; and, as if in
anticipation of his own death, Wesley tells his readers, that, not
" to lessen the honour of the house of God, or infect it wnth
unwholesome vapours, he has left orders to bury his remains,
not in the new chapel in City Road, but in the burying
ground adjoining it ;" and then, to show that " epitaphs
ought to be prepared by persons who have some knowledge
of grammatical and typographical accuracy ; and not be left
to illiterate relations, parish clerks, or stonemasons, to the
great scandal of the nation in general, and of religion in
particular," he gives the following, taken from a tombstone
in Arbroath churchyard.
" Here lyis Alexand Peter, present Town Treasurer of Arbroth, who
died day January 1630.
" Such a Treasurer was not since, nor yet before,
For common works, calsais, brigs, and schoir — •
Of all others he did excel ;
He deviced our skoel, and he hung our belL"
I7S5.
^IzP "XT LESLEY began the year 1785, by spending five days in
Age 82 V V walking through London, often ankle deep in sludge
and melting snow, to beg ;^200, which he employed in pur-
chasing clothing for the poor. He visited the destitute in
their own houses, " to see with his own eyes what their wants
were, and how they might be effectually relieved." Besides
preaching in his own chapels, he preached in Spitalfields, St.
Ethelburga's, and Stepney churches. As usual, he met the
London classes, from which he received, as ticket money,
£48 ys., out of which he was paid his quarter's salary, £1^.^
His activity was unabated and marvellous.
He wrote as follows, to Mr. Stretton, in Newfoundland.
" London, February 25, 1785.
"My dear Brother,— If that deadly enemy of true religion, popery,
is breaking in upon you, there is indeed no time to be lost ; for it is far
easier to prevent the plague than to stop it. Last autumn Dr. Coke sailed
from England, and is now visiting the flock in the midland provinces of
America, and setting them on the New Testament plan, to which they all
willingly and joyfully conform. I trust, they will no more want such
pastors, as are after God's own heart. After he has gone through these
parts, he intends to see the brethren in Nova Scotia, probably attended
with one or two able preachers, who will be willing to abide there. A day
or two ago, I wrote and desired him to call upon our brethren also in
Newfoundland, and leave a preacher there hkewise. About food and
raiment we take no thought ; our heavenly Father knoweth that we need
these things, and He will provide ; only let us be faithful and diligent in
feeding His flock. Your preacher will be ordained. You shall want no
assistance that is in the power of your affectionate friend and brother,
"John Wesley."^
At the previous conference, Wesley had appointed William
Moore to Plymouth. Moore was an itinerant of ten years'
standing, and was dissatisfied with Wesley's deed of de-
claration ; and, instead of serving Wesley, as he had done
' City Road society book,
^ Methodist Magazine, 1824, p. 307.
William Moore, at Plymouth. 459
formerly, he dissevered the connection. He hired a room, 1785
drew away about forty of the Plymouth Methodists, and a^u^
formed a society of his own. He issued " An Appeal to the
Inhabitants of the Town of Saltash," 8vo, 8 pages ; telling the
people, that he preached none other doctrines than those con-
tained in the articles, homilies, and prayers of the Church of
England ; that he coveted no man's silver, gold, or apparel ;
and that he was actuated only by a sincere desire to serve
them. Moore was evidently a man of education, courage,
and Christian zeal ; and might have occupied a superior
position among his brethren. But Wesley's seeming partiality,
in the constitution of his conference, led to Moore's secession;
and here, at Plymouth, he had become a somewhat formidable
rival. Wesley was summoned, and, in a most bitter frost,
off he went, on February 28, to put wrong things right.
Here he spent six days, and left the society "confirmed in
the truth more than ever."
Leaving Plymouth, Wesley came to Bristol, where he em-
ployed a fortnight in visiting and preaching to neighbouring
societies.
On March 21, he started off to Ireland, preaching all the
way to Liverpool, and, notwithstanding frost and snow, and
bitter cold, frequently in the open air. He arrived at Dublin
on April 11, and found "two such preachers," James Rogers
and Andrew Blair, "with two such wives as he knew not
where to find again."
Having spent a week in Dublin, he set out for the provinces.
He often preached in churches, and not unfrequently in the
open air. Everywhere, with one or two exceptions, the people
welcomed him ; congregations were large, and societies, in
general, were lively. Two months were occupied in this
employment. His labours were almost incredible. All over
Ireland he went, preaching every day, and often twice or thrice
a day, not only in Methodist meeting-houses, but in churches,
presbyterian chapels, in factories, in bowling greens, in assem-
bly rooms, in courthouses, in barns, in "sloping meadows,"
in " shady orchards," in groves and avenues, in linen halls, in
churchyards and streets, everywhere, where he had a chance.
We know, with certainty, that, minute as are the details of
Wesley's journals, he, by no means, mentions every sermon
4^0 Life and Times of Wesley.
1 7^5 that he delivered, and every society that he visited ; and yet,
Age 82 in this two months' Irish provincial tour, he records the names
of not fewer than between fifty and sixty towns, in which he
preached, collectively, about fourscore discourses.
At Prosperous, he found a town built within the last five
years, by Captain Brooke, who employed two thousand people
in the manufacturing of cotton ; a Methodist society of fifty
members had been formed ; and Wesley preached to two
crowded congregations. On his way to Cork, he was met by
about thirty horsemen, who escorted him to the city, where
he met a society of about four hundred members, consider-
ably more than there are at the present time. At Kinsale, "all
behaved well, but a few officers." He adds : " the poor in Ire-
land, in general, are well behaved ; all the ill breeding is among
well dressed people." At Limerick, he assisted at a service,
in the cathedral, which lasted from eleven o'clock till three.
At Killchrist, he was the guest of Colonel Pearse ; but says,
" the house being full of genteel company, I was out of my
element ; there being no room to talk upon the only subject
which deserves the attention of a rational creature." At
Ballinrobe, he visited the charter school, the children of
which were ragged and dirty. " The schoolroom was not
much bigger than a small closet : " three beds had to serve
for fifteen boys, and five for nineteen girls ; and five farthings
a day were allowed the master for the sustenance of each of
the hunger bitten pupils. Wesley was so disgusted with
the thing, that he reported the case to the commissioners for
charter schools in Dublin.
On June 18, he got back to Dublin, where he spent his
birthday, on the 28th, and wrote : " By the good providence
of God, I finished the eighty-second year of my age. Is any-
thing too hard for God .-• It is now eleven years since I have
felt any such thing as weariness : many times I speak till my
voice fails, and I can speak no longer ; frequently I walk till
my strength fails, and I can walk no farther ; yet, even then,
I feel no sensation of weariness, but am perfectly easy from
head to foot. I dare not impute this to natural causes ; it is
the will of God."
Having held the Irish conference he set sail for England,
on July 10, leaving, says he, "the work of God increasing in
Meihodism in Ireland. 461
every part of the kingdom, more than it has done for many 1785
years." " Here is a set of excellent young preachers ; nine Age 82
in ten of them are much devoted to God. I think, number
for number, they exceed their fellow labourers in England."^
The following letter refers to the same subject, and is too
interesting to be omitted. It was addressed to Miss Ritchie.
't5
" Dublin, June 26, 1785.
" My dear Betsy, — Our Lord has indeed poured out abundance of
blessings, almost in every part of this kingdom. I have now gone
through every province, and visited all the chief societies, and I have
found far the greater part of them increasing both in number and strength.
Many are convinced of sin ; many justified ; and not a few perfected in
love. One means of which is, that several of our young preachers, of
whom we made little account, appear to be, contrary to all expectation,
men full of faith and of the Holy Ghost ; and they are pushing out, to
the right hand and the left ; and, wherever they go, God prospers their
labours. I know not whether Thomas Walsh will not revive in two, if
not three, of them.
" Many years ago I was saying : * I cannot imagine how Mr. Whitefield
can keep his soul alive, as he is not now going through honour and
dishonour, evil report and good report ; having nothing but honour and
good report attending him wherever he goes.' It is now my own case ;
I am just in the condition now that he was then in. I am become,
I know not how, an honourable man. The scandal of the cross is ceased ;
and all the kingdom, rich and poor, papists and protestants, behave with
courtesy, nay, and seeming good will ! It seems as if I had well-nigh
finished my course, and our Lord was giving me an honourable discharge.
"Peace be with your spirit ! Adieu !
"John Wesley."*
A letter, from Wesley to Mr. Stretton, has been already
given, announcing that preachers were about to be sent to
Nova Scotia and Newfoundland. This was already done ;
and Freeborn Garretson and James Cromwell Avere
labouring, in the former country, with great success.
Wesley, while in Ireland, wrote to Garretson as follows.
"Dublin, Jinic 16, 1785.
"My dear Brother,— I am glad brother Cromwell and you have
undertaken that 'labour of love' of visiting Nova Scotia; and doubt
not but you act in full concert with the little handful, who were almost
alone till you came. It will be the wisest way to make all those who
' Wesley's Works, vol. xii., p. 143. ^ Ibid, vol. xiii., p. 6l.
462 Life and Times of Wesley.
^785 desire to join together, thoroughly acquainted with the whole Methodist
^ ^^ plan ; and to accustom them, from the very beginning, to the accurate
^^ observance of all our rules. Let none of them rest in being half Christians.
Whatever they do, let them do it with their might ; and it will be well, as
soon as any of them find peace with God, to exhort them to ' go on to
perfection.' The more explicitly and strongly you press all believers to
aspire after full sanctification, as attainable now by simple faith, the more
the whole work of God will prosper.
" I do not expect any great matters from the bishop. I doubt his eye
is not single ; and if it be not, he will do little good to you, or any one
else. It may be a comfort to you, that you have no need of him. You
want nothing which he can give.
" You do not know the state of the English Methodists; they do not roll
in money, like many of the American Methodists. It is with the utmost
difficulty, that we can raise five or six hundred pounds a year to supply
our contingent expenses ; so that it is entirely impracticable to raise ^{^500
among them to build houses in America. It is true, they might do much;
but it is a sad observation, they that have most money have usually least
grace.
" The peace of God be with all your spirits ! I am your affectionate
friend and brother, a ^^^^ WESLEY." »
Thus was Methodism spreading. We find it firmly planted
throughout the whole of the United Kingdom. Its members
in America were counted by thousands. It had its societies
in the West Indies. It had taken root in Newfoundland and
Nova Scotia. And, besides all this, it was beginning to exert
indirectly a benign influence on other lands, where, since
then, religion has been extensively revived. The Methodist
mission to Sweden, begun by Joseph Rayner Stephens, in
1826, was facilitated by Methodist feeling, imbibed from
Wesley, in 1785. Hence the following letter, from an aged
clergyman of the established church of Sweden, written in
1827, and addressed to Mr. Stephens.
" It affected my heart to see, in the newspapers of Stockholm, that an
adherent to the famous and venerable Mr. J. Wesley had established a
chapel, for Divine service, in our metropolis. Mr. Wesley was an old
acquaintance of mine when I resided in England in the years 1784-86.
He was more ; he was my dear friend, and with him I agreed in his
Christian principles and opinions. I was exceedingly pleased with him,
and with his religion of love, joy, and peace. I very often waited on him
at his house; and I was several times in company with him in the circle of
* Wesley's Works, vol. xiii., p. 66.
Death of Perrond and Fletcher. 463
his friends, where I went to prayer with them. I learned of him, to be a 1785
father to the people that might be entrusted to me. I shall never forget —
the amiable Mr. Wesley. He was so good as to give me a remembrance ^
of him, by a present of one of his writings, called 'An Appeal,' etc.. in
which he wrote these lines, ' Domino N. S. S. dono dedit Johannes
Wesley, ct7'c. Kal, Augusti, 1785.' He gave me also several other of his
Christian pamphlets. I am far advanced in age ; towards seventy-six
years old : but, if the almighty God grant me life and health, perhaps I
may make a tour to Stockholm next summer, when I have done with my
catechumens ; and then I shall certainly wait upon you, and make one of
your auditory.*
While Wesley was forming new friendships, old ones were
being severed by death. It was in 1785, that he thus lost two
of the most valuable and valued friends that he ever had, —
Vincent Perronet, and John Fletcher, the vicars of Shoreham
and Madeley. The former was in the ninety-second year of
his age, and died, while Wesley was in Ireland, on the 9th
of May. Charles Wesley buried him, and preached his
funeral sermon. For the last twenty years, he had enjoyed
such a degree of fellowship with God as rarely falls to
the lot of man in the present world. He lived chiefly
in his library ; but, when he mingled with his friends, was
always cheerful. His favourite study was the fulfilment of
prophecy, and the second coming and visible reign of
Christ on earth.^
While Perronet was the oldest, Fletcher was the most
valuable friend that Wesley had. No man had rendered, to
Methodism and its founder, the service that the vicar of
Madeley had. Compared with the vicar of Shoreham, he
was young ; but his life was fraught with incalculable
blessings to the church of Christ. Only four years before
his death, he had married Miss Bosanquet, who, for thirty
years, revered his memory, and remained his widow, till the
two were reunited in a better world than this. As we
have already seen, he was present at Wesley's last conference,
in Leeds ; and it was chiefly by his almost angelic inter-
position and services, that the results of that conference were
not much more disastrous than they were. His wife was
with him, and writes : " O how deeply was he afi"ected con-
"^ Methodist Magazine, 1828, p. 46. * Ibid. 1799, P- 161.
464 Life and Times of Wesley.
1 785 cerning the welfare of his brethren ! When any little
A^82 disputes arose among them, his inmost soul groaned be-
neath the burden ; and, by two or three in the morning, I
was sure to hear him breathing out prayer for the peace
and prosperity of Zion. When I observed to him, I was
afraid it would hurt his health, and wished him to sleep
more, he would answer, ' O Polly, the cause of God lies near
my heart!' "*
Twelve months afterwards, this seraphic man expired, some
of his last words being : " O Polly, my dear Polly, God is
love ! Shout ! shout aloud ! I want a gust of praise to go to
the ends of the earth ! " He died August 14, 1785, having,
on the previous sabbath, read prayers, preached, and admi-
nistered the Lord's supper, in his parish church. Wesley, at
the time, was in the west of England, and unable either to
see him, or to attend his funeral ; but, as soon as possible,
he published a sermon in memory of him, taking the
same text as his brother Charles had taken at the death of-
Perronet : " Mark the perfect man, and behold the upright ;
for the end of that man is peace." Wesley writes :
" I was intimately acquainted with him for above thirty years ; I con-
versed with him morning, noon, and night, without the least reserve,
during a journey of many hundred miles ; and, in all that time, I never
heard him speak one improper word, nor saw him do an improper action.
Many exemplary men have I known, holy in heart and Ufe, within four-
score years; but one equal to him I have not known, one so inwardly
and outwardly devoted to God. So unblamable a character, in every
respect, I have not found cither in Europe or America ; and I scarce
expect to find such another on this side of eternity."
Wesley arrived in London, from Ireland, on July 14 ; and,
on the following Sunday, preached, morning and evening,
on the education of children. The next morning, at five
o'clock, he met the children of the congregation at City Road,
the morning chapel being full of juveniles, and many standing
in the larger chapel. The service was unique. When, either
before or. since, was there such a congregation at such an
hour .''
Wesley writes: "July 26, Tuesday— Our conference began;
1 Wesley's Works, vol. xi., p. 334.
Conference ^1785. 465
at which about seventy preachers were present, whom I had 17^5
invited by name. One consequence of this was, that we had Age 82
no contention or altercation at all ; but everything proposed
was calmly considered, and determined as we judged would
be most for the glory of God." The deed of declaration was
again discussed ; and seventy preachers present signed docu-
ments, that they approved of it. Eight preachers left the
connexion, including William Moore and the two Hampsons.
Nova Scotia, Newfoundland, and Antigua, for the first time,
appeared in the list of circuits. It was declared, that it was
improper to sell books, to employ hairdressers, or to talk of
worldly things, on Sundays ; and that it was entirely wrong
to send Methodist children to dancing schools, and for
dancing masters to be admitted into Methodist boarding
schools.
The conference was closed on August 3, and, five days
afterwards, Wesley set out for Cornwall;^ and on September 3
, got back to Bristol, where he wrote: "Sunday, September 4 —
Finding a report had been spread abroad, that I was going
to leave the Church, to satisfy those that were grieved
concerning it, I openly declared in the evening, that I had no
more thought of separating from the Church than I had forty
years ago."
Here, and in the neighbourhood, he spent a month. On
October 3, he returned to London ; and, the next day, set
out for Hertfordshire. A week later, he was off to Oxford-
shire ; and the week after that, to Norfolk. He writes :
" October 22 — I returned to Norwich ; and, in the evening,
spoke home to an uncommonly large congregation ; telling
them, ' Of all the people I have seen in the kingdom, for
between forty and fifty years, you have been the most
fickle, and yet the most stubborn.' However, our labour
^ Among other places, Wesley preached at St. Austell, where his host
had a httle girl, twelve years of age, who had recently been admitted
into the Methodist society by Adam Clarke. That little girl is now
Mrs. Shaw, aged ninety-eight, and well remembers Wesley taking her,
more than once, in his carriage for a drive, and showing her other marks
of affectionate attention. Mrs. Shaw — happy, intelligent, and full of faith,
— is a mother in Israel, and probably the oldest Methodist now living. The
writer has in his possession, in Mrs. Shaw's own handwriting, a beautiful
hymn of five stanzas, composed by her, in the month of May, 1869.
VOL. III. H H
466 Life and Times of Wesley.
1785 has not been lost, for many have died in peace ; and God
Age82 is able to say to the residue of these dry bones, ' Live ! ' "
Querulous and quarrelsome Thomas Wride was, at this
time, the assistant in Norwich circuit, and, from a large mass
of his manuscripts in the author's possession, the following
facts are gleaned. A monument to the memory of Mr.
Turner had been erected in the chapel, on which were
chiselled certain "doggrel verses," with which Wride was
greatly dissatisfied. He had told the society, on September
4, what they might expect from him, in reference to meeting
in class, showing tickets, etc.; and says "the terror of his
countenance had awed them, and several had owned that
they were afraid of him." He had received a quantity of
sermons for sale, and, among others. Dr. Coke's sermon,
preached in Baltimore, at the ordination of Asbury; which,
he says, he is reluctant to put into circulation. He writes:
" It amounts to a formal separation from the Church of
England, and, in the end, will tear up Methodism by the
roots. Whatever may be said of America, I cannot think it
right, for us here, to declare ourselves independent of the
Church of England, while we enjoy the privileges we have
always done. I dread the consequence ; for, if we are inde-
pendents, hardly any will come to us, but such as choose to
change their religion; whereas, those to whom the Methodists
have been mainly useful had no religion to change." Wride
was also dissatisfied with his colleagues; for J. McKersey would
sing a hymn between the first prayer and the sermon ; and
James McByron would permit the congregations to sing
anthems. McKersey also refused to preach at five in the
mornings ; for though, as he said, he could rise soon enough,
he was not able to preach till he had had his breakfast; and, in
consequence, WVide had advised him to take his breakfast to
bed with him. Wride acknowledges, that the Methodists at
Norwich had not been used to morning preaching. The rich
would not attend; and, as the poor did not begin to work till
eight o'clock, and could not afford to burn a fire, they were
reluctant to rise so early. Hence, when he himself had
preached, his congregation consisted only of his wife and two
others, Mr. McKersey, further, had neglected the select
band; and had declared he v/ould "rather go twelve miles
Thomas Wride. 46 7
than meet the children." Wride multiplies complaints against 1785
the leading singers, and against the leaders, Messrs. Booty, Age82
Best, James and George Hay, Kilburn, Senior, Flegg, and
Johnson; and declares that a preacher, sent to Norwich
circuit, ought to combine in himself the qualities of "the lion,
the lamb, the dove, the serpent, and the ox."
Poor Wride ! The contention continued, and, early in
1786, Wesley had to remove him to another post of duty;
but, before doing so, he addressed to him the following letters,
which have not before been published.
" London, November 8, 1 785.
"Dear Tommy, — James Byron is an amiable young man ; at present
full of faith and love. - If possible, guard him from those that will be
inclined to love him too well. Then he will be as useful a fellow labourer
as you can desire. And set him a pattern in all things.
" I am, dear Tommy, your affectionate friend and brother,
"John Wesley."
" London, November 1 7, 1 785.
" Dear Tommy, — Deal plainly, and yet tenderly with James Byron,
and he will be a very useful labourer. But none can be a Methodist
preacher, unless he is both able and willing to preach in the morning ;
which is the most healthy exercise in the world. I desire, that none of
our preachers would sing oftener than twice at one service. We need
nothing to fill up our hour.
"In every place, where there is a sufficient number of believers, do all
you can to prevail upon them to meet in band. Be mild ; be serious ; and
you will conquer all things.
. " I am, dear Tommy, your affectionate friend and brother,
"John Wesley."
"London, Z>^r^/«^<?r 14, 1785.
"Dear Tommy, — Have patience with the young men, and they will
mend upon your hands. But remember ! soft and fair goes far. For twenty
years and upwards, we had good morning congregations at Norwich ;
but they might begin at six till Ladyday. I desire brother Byron to try
what he can do : better days will come.
"I pray, let the doggrel hymn be no more sung in our chapel. If
they do not soon come to their senses at Norwich, I will remove you to
Colchester. Be mild ! Be serious !
" I am, dear Tommy, your affectionate friend and brother,
"John Wesley."
Tommy Wride was not the only preacher that gave Wesley
trouble. For twelve years, Michael Moorhouse had been one
4^8 Life and Times of Wesley.
1785 of his itinerants, and had had his share of persecution. In
A"e~82 ^17'^> while preaching in the market place at Melton Mow-
bray, he was pulled down by a ruthless mob, and, with three
other peaceable men, dragged to the Black Hole, where
means were used to impress him for the army. ^ Moorhouse
now was discontented, and, in 1785, published a broadsheet of
sixteen columns, in small type, entitled " An Appeal to
Honest Men," and full of petty grievances, particularly with
regard to the influence of John Crook and Wesley, and
respecting his own appointments to inferior circuits. At the
conference of 1786, he left the work ; and then embodied the
wailings of his Appeal in an octavo volume of 128 pages, with
the title, "Defence of Mr. Michael Moorhouse, written by
himself" He bitterly complains of Wesley for suffering some
of the wives of his preachers to dine on potatoes and butter-
milk, while others were pampered with good cheer; and for
allowing their husbands to wear great coats, and to use
umbrellas on a rainy day. The Monthly Reviciv, in noticing
poor Moorhouse's notable production, quietly remarks : " The
labourer is certainly worthy of his hire, but, in adjusting
the hire to the labourer, a good deal must depend on the
workman's skill ; and, if we are to judge of Master Michael
Moorhouse's preaching abilities, from his illiterate and silly
performance, we do not see how his master could have
afforded him higher wages : perhaps he might fare better, if
he were to return to his lawful occupation."
These were among the petty annoyances of Wesley's busy
life. He had, in all conscience, enough to do without these ;
but, in his position, such vexations were inevitable.
Returning from Norfolk, Wesley spent the rest of the year
in London, and in preaching tours through Northamptonshire
and Kent.
Before proceeding to notice his publications, it is right to
say that, at this time, an important pamphlet of twelve pages
was issued with the following title : " Free Thoughts concern-
ing a Separation of the People called Methodists from the
Church of England, addressed to the Preachers in the
Methodist Connexion, by a Layman of the Methodist
^ Thomas Dixon's manuscript autobiography.
Separation fi'oin the Ckiirc/i. 469
society." The pamphlet may be taken as an echo of the 1785
opinions then prevalent, and a brief account of it may be Age82
useful.
The writer states, that the arguments, used in favour of
separation, are, not that the government, service, and doctrine
of the Church are unscriptural, but, that the clergy are not
converted men ; that Methodism loses many of its members
through the sacraments not being administered ; that the
Church of England is a fallen church ; that the time is fully
come when the Methodists ought to be an independent body;
that the good effects of separation are already seen in the
continent of America ; and that separation will probably take
place at Mr. Wesley's death.
Having endeavoured to refute these arguments, the author
proceeds to give his reasons against separation : namely (i)
many of the Methodists are zealous for the Church of
England, and would be offended ; (2) separation implies or-
dination, which would be a bone of contention, an apple of
discord, among the preachers, as to who should be ordainers ;
(3) these "gownsmen or ordainers would have the government
of the body more and more devolved upon them, and, instead
of being itinerants, would become resident in one. place, the
itinerant plan thereby becoming gradually weakened, or
continued only by razu lads on trial."
The arguments, pro and coji, are given as we find them ;
and merely to show the grounds taken by the opposing parties
in 1785.
Excepting Fletcher's funeral sermon, 8vo, 32 pages, Wesley's
publications were only four in number.
1. " A Pocket Hymn Book for the use of Christians of all
Denominations." 24mo, 208 pages.
2. " An Extract from the Rev. Mr. John Wesley's Journal,
from August 9, 1779, to August 20, 1782." i2mo, 92 pages.
3. "A Call to the Unconverted. By R. Baxter." i2mo,
y6 pages.
4. The Arminian Magazine. 8vo, 66Z pages.
The Arminian Magazine contains extracts from Dr.
Whitby's Discourses on the Five Points, and from Maun-
drell's Journey from Aleppo to Jerusalem. There are bio-
graphical accounts of William McCormick, Martha Rogers,
470 Life and Times of Wesley.
^25.5 Nancy Bissaker, James Creighton, Ann Roylands, John
Age 82 Pritchard, and many others. There are more than thirty
letters, and as many poetic pieces. There is Wesley's sermon
on his favourite text, i Corinthians xiii. 1-3. Also his sermon
on perfection, in which his most matured views, on this
momentous subject, are stated with his wonted lucidity. The
sermon on Hebrews xiii. 17 is remarkable. The point he en-
deavours to establish is, that, " It is the duty of every private
Christian to obey his spiritual pastor, by either doing or leaving
undone anything of an indifferent nature ; anything that is
in no way determined in the word of God." In applying the
principle to himself and the Methodists, he asks : " Do you
take my advice with regard to dress 1 I published that advice
above thirty years ago ; I have repeated it a thousand times
since. I have advised you to lay aside all needless orna-
ments : to avoid all needless expense : to be patterns of plain-
ness to all that are round about you. Have you taken this
advice t Are you all exemplarily plain in your apparel ? as
plain as quakers or Moravians ? If not, you declare hereby
to all the world, that you will not obey them that are over
you in the Lord." Wesley's doctrine maybe disputed; but
the practical use to which he puts it deserves attention. There
are three more of his original sermons — on John i. 47 ; Philip-
pians ii. 12, 13 ; and Revelation xxi. 5— which are well worth
reading.
1786.
WESLEY spent the first two months of 1786 in London. 1786
He went to the House of Lords at the opening of Age 83
parHament, and heard King George HI. read the royal
speech. He writes : " How agreeably was I surprised. He
pronounced every Avord with exact propriety. I much doubt
whether there be any other king in Europe, that is so just
and natural a speaker."
Wesley had a remarkable season at City Road. While
preaching, the power of God came down ; the preacher broke
out in prayer ; and the congregation burst into a loud and
general cry.
Of his own religious feelings he wrote :
" February 24, 1 786. — I do not remember to have heard or read anything
like my own experience. Almost ever since I can remember, I have been
led on in a peculiar way. I go on in an even line, being very little raised at
one time, or depressed at another. Count Zinzendorf observes, there are
three different ways wherein it pleases God to lead His people. Some are
guided, almost in every instance, by apposite texts of Scripture. Others
see a clear and plain reason for everything they are to do. And, yet,
others are led not so much by Scripture and reason as by particular
impressions. I am very rarely led by impressions, but generally by
reason and by Scripture. I see abundantly more than I feel. I want to
feel more love and zeal for God." '
On February 26, Wesley set out, in a snowstorm, on a
journey which occupied more than the next four months.
His first halt was at Newbury, where he had "a large and
serious congregation;" but where, he says, he passed such a
night as he had not passed for forty years, his lodging room
being as cold as the outward air. He writes : " I could not
sleep at all till three in the morning. I rose at four, and set
out at five."
The next fortnight was spent at Bristol and in its vicinity
On Sunday, March 5, he went through an amount of labour
^ Wesley's Works, vol. xiii., p. 62.
472 Life and Times of Wesley.
1786 which would have appalled most men half his age. "I read
^Z^g, prayers," says he, "and preached, and administered the
sacrament to about five hundred communicants. At three, I
preached in Temple church ; at five in the New Room."
Eight days later, he started ofif to Scotland, when the roads
were blocked up with snow, and the Aveather intensely cold.
More than a week was spent at Birmingham: during which he
had another sacramental service, as large as that at Bristol ;
and preached at Madeley a funeral sermon for the sainted
Fletcher, taking as his text Revelation xiv. i-/.^ At Lane
End, after it was dark, and in a piercingly cold wind, he says :
" I was constrained to preach abroad ; and none of us seemed
to regard the weather, for God warmed our hearts." At
Burslem, in the same inclement season, the congregation was
such, that the venerable preacher was obliged again to take
his stand in the open air. Aftet" preaching at Congleton,
Macclesfield, and other places, he came to Chapel-en-le-Frith,
where a large number had been converted, but who needed
discipline. He writes : " Frequently three or four, yea, ten
or twelve, pray aloud all together. Some of them, perhaps
many, scream all together as loud as they possibly can.
Some use improper, yea, indecent, expressions in prayer.
Several drop down as dead, and are as stiff as a corpse ;
but, in a while, they start up, and cry, ' Glory ! Glory ! '
perhaps twenty times together. Just so do the French
prophets, and very lately the jumpers, in Wales, bring the
real work into contempt. Yet, whenever we reprove them,
it should be in the most mild and gentle manner possible."
At Bolton, he had, in his congregation, five hundred and
fifty children, all scholars in the Methodist Sunday-school ;
and it was either now, or soon after, that he preached to them
a sermon, from Psalm xxxiv. ii, in which he engaged to use
no word of more than two syllables, and literally fulfilled his
pledge.^
His congregations throughout Lancashire, and the west
riding of Yorkshire, were enormous, often compelling him
to preach out of doors. His popularity was greater than
ever. Churches were offered for his use, and accepted, at
^ Mrs. Mortimer's Life. ^ Banning's Memoirs.
Met}iodis7it in Scotland. 473
Haworth, Binglcy, Heptonstall, Todmorden, Horsforth, and 1786
York. Persecution had ceased ; and everywhere the Christian ^(^83
veteran was greeted with the welcomes of admiring and loving
crowds.
Leaving York on the 8th of May, Wesley, for the first time,
visited the town of Easingwold, where was a class of seventeen
members, the leader of which was John Barber •} and where
a chapel had been built, costing £\\o, only half of which was
paid.^ To open this was the object of Wesley's visit.
He then proceeded to Scotland, where the Methodists were
now really .a distinct and separated church ; for not only had
Hanby, Pawson, and others been ordained, and invested with
gown and bands, but sacraments were administered ; and,
while society tickets admitted to society meetings and the
lovefeasts, circular metal tokens seemed to become the
badge of church membership, having on one side the letters
" M. C," and on the other the words, " Do this in remembrance
of Me." The tokens admitted the owners to the table of the
Lord.
On the 1st of June, Wesley laid the foundation stone of a
new chapel at Alnwick ; and, on the following Sunday,
preached three times out of doors, to vast congregations, at
Gateshead and Newcastle.
On the 5th of June, he set out southwards. Pursuing his
usual route, he came to Hull, a fortnight afterAvards, and, at
the vicar's invitation, preached twice to immense crowds " in
one of the largest parish churches in England." The next
day, he rode seventy-six miles, and preached at Malton,
Pocklington, and Swinfleet. "Sufficient," says he, "for this
day was the labour thereof ; but still I was no more tired
than when I rose in the morning." Can such a fact as this
be paralleled .-' The day after, he preached at Crowle, and
Epworth ; and the next day after that, at Scotter, Brigg, and
Grimsby. At Louth, for the first time, he saw the people
"affected." At Gainsborough, his old friend, Sir Nevil
Hickman, was dead ; but he made the yard of his house his
preaching place. On Saturday and Sunday, June 24 and 25,
he preached at New Inn, Newark, Retford, Misterton, Over-
* Manuscript. ^ Manuscript letter by Mather.
474 Life and Times of Wesley.
1^6 thorpe, and Epworth, six times, at six dififerent towns, in two
Age 83 days, the preacher himself eighty-three years of age !
He writes: "1786, June 30 — I turned aside to Barnsley,
formerly famous for all manner of wickedness. They were
then ready to tear any Methodist preacher to pieces. Now
not a dog wagged his tongue. I preached near the market
place to a large congregation ; and, I believe, the word sunk
into many hearts ; they seemed to drink in every word.
Surely God will have a people in this place."
Wesley might well speak of the brutal wickedness of
Barnsley. Three years before, a man resolved to murder
Henry Longden, ran up to him while preaching, aimed a
blow w'hich w^ould probably have been fatal, but Longden
leaped aside, and providentially escaped.^ On another oc-
casion, Jeremiah Cocker, while preaching in the market place,
was pulled down, dragged through the streets, and pelted with
rotten eggs, one of which had a dead gosling in it. Cocker
applied to the vicar of Sheffield for protection ; the rioters
were committed for trial at the Rotherham sessions ; but
were acquitted, on the ground that, though the preacher was
licensed to preach, the spot he chose was not licensed as a
preaching place ! Here John Barber, a few months before
Wesley's visit, w^as saluted with a shower of stones, was
seriously hurt, and was rescued by a friendly quaker, who
lived in " Barnsley Folly." At another time, a mob, of
some hundreds, assembled with cows' horns, drums, and
other noisy instruments, and most effectually prevented the
preacher being heard. Mr. Raynor, a currier, having lent his
house for preaching, the Barnsley roughs made a bonfire at
the door, compelled the congregation to seek egress by some
other way, and pelted them most mercilessly with filth of the
foulest kind. Such are specimens of the treatment received
by the poor Methodists in Barnsley, between the years 1780
and 1786. The society was small, not numbering a dozen
members ; and they had no preaching room, except Raynor's
house, till about 1792, when Alexander Mather secured a
small chamber over a w^eaver's shop in Church Street.^
From Barnsley, Wesley went to Sheffield, where he selected
' Longden's Life. 2 Manuscripts.
Wesley at Sheffield, and Weiitworth House. 475
as his text, "It is high time to awake out of sleep"; and an 1786
anonymous hearer sent him a letter, saying, that he could Age~83
remember nothing that he said, except that " rising early was
good for the nerves!" Here he spent several days, held the
quarterly meeting and a lovefeast, administered the sacrament
to six or seven hundred persons, visited Wentworth House,
baptized Joseph Benson's infant daughter,' and was Mr.
Holy's guest. After preaching, crowds were wont to follow
him to his hospitable lodging ; the streets were lined, and
the windows of the houses thronged with eager but respectful
gazers, Wesley all the while emptying his pockets in scatter-
ing gifts among the poor. A vast concourse of people as-
sembled on the green, at the front of Mr. Holy's house ;
Wesley walked into the midst of them, knelt down, and
asked God to bless them. The place became a Bochim ; the
crowd wept and literally wailed at the thought of losing him ;
he prayed again ; and then darted into Mr. Holy's dwelling,
and hid himself.^ What a contrast to the reception given to
his brother in 1743 !
His visit to Wentworth House has been mentioned. It is
a curious fact, but attentive readers of Wesley's journal will
easily perceive, that, as Wesley grew older, he took far more
interest in visiting scenes of beauty and historic buildings
than he did in the earlier parts of his illustrious career. How
to account for this, we know not ; but so it was.
Tradition says, that Wesley was accompanied by Mr.
Birks, of Thorpe, and that, when they were leaving, Mr. Birks
asked Mr. Hall, the steward, if it would be agreeable for Mr.
Wesley to pray with the family before he left. Permission
was courteously given ; the household were summoned ; and
Wentworth House was none the worse for the prayer which
the arch Methodist offered beneath its roof.
From Sheffield, Wesley proceeded, by way of Belper and
Derby, to Ilkestone. This was his first and last visit to the
last mentioned town, and the circumstances connected with it
are worth relating. For many years, the only Methodist in
Ilkestone had been a poor old w'oman. The preachers
preached, but, apparently, without effect. At length, the old
^ Methodist Magazine, 1836, p. 166. ^ Manuscript
t>
476 Life and Times of Wesley.
1786 woman died, and John Crook resolved to preach a funeral
Ase's^ sermon. A large congregation assembled at the front of a
public house, Mr. Crook stood upon a stone used by travel-
lers for mounting horses. The sermon was worthy of the
Methodist apostle of the Isle of Man ; and, at its close, the
preacher received a message from the vicar of the parish,
requesting him to wait upon him next morning. John went,
and was received with kindness. "Sir," said the clergyman,
"I heard you preach last night with pleasure ; in what college
were you educated.-'" "I never attended college," was the
answer. " Sir," rejoined the vicar, " I have heard many of
the heads of our universities preach, but I never heard
a defence of our establishment equal to yours. You are
welcome to my pulpit next Sunday." Crook replied, that he
was not ordained ; and proposed that, instead of preaching
ivitJiiii the church, he should preach at the church's door.
The proposal was accepted ; the vicar published from the
pulpit the intended service ; the itinerant selected as his text,
" He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved ; he that
believeth not shall be damned ;" under that sermon, the
priest was deeply convinced of sin, and next Sunday told his
congregation, that he was an earnest seeker of salvation ; he
learnt that Crook was one of Wesley's preachers, and sent to
Wesley an invitation;* and here, on Thursday July 6, we
find him. He writes : " Though the church is large, it was
sufficiently crowded. The vicar read prayers with great
earnestness and propriety; I preached; and the people seemed
all ear. Surely good will be done in this place ; though it is
strongly opposed both by the Calvinists and Socinians."
Good was done. Among Wesley's hearers was a joiner,
Richard Birch. Wesley's discourse reached his heart. He
was converted ; and, finding that there was in the town a
class of four Methodists, he became the fifth ; and, before the
year expired, he and his friends built a chapel.
Wesley arrived in London, after an absence of nearly
twenty weeks, on July 13. Four days were spent in town,
and then he started off again to Bristol, for the purpose of
holding his annual conference. He writes :
1 Memoirs of Rev. H. Taft, M.D., p. 6,
Separation from the Church. 477
"July 25, Tuesday — Our conference began: about eighty preachers 1786
attended. We met every day at six and nine in the morning, and at two a~o,
in the afternoon. On Tuesday, and on Wednesday morning, the characters "
of the preachers were considered. On Thursday, in the afternoon, we
permitted any of the society to be present ; and weighed what was said
about separating from the Church ; but we all determined to continue
therein, without one dissenting voice ; and I doubt not but this
determination will stand, at least, till I am removed into a better
world. The conference concluded on Tuesday morning, August i.
Great had been the expectations of many, that we should have had
warm debates ; but, by the mercy of God, we had none at all; everything
was transacted with great calmness ; and we parted, as we met, in peace
and love."
Separation from the Church was afrain the great question of
the day. From the above extract, taken from his journal, it
is evident, that Wesley was more than apprehensive that such
a separation would occur subsequent to his decease ; but it is
equally evident, that he was glad to have it postponed till
then. In an unpublished letter to Thomas Taylor, dated
February 21, 1786, he writes : "The wise bishop Gibson once
said, 'Why cannot these gentlemen leave the Church? Then
they could do no more harm.' Read ' no more good,' and it
would have been a truth. I believe, if we had then left the
Church, we should not have done a tenth of the good which
we have done. But I do not insist upon this head. I go
calmly and quietly on my way, doing what I conceive to be
the will of God. I do not, will not, concern myself with
what will be done when I am dead. I take no thought about
that. If I did, I should probably shut myself up at Kings-
vi^ood or Newcastle, and leave you all to yourselves."
" I love the Church," said Wesley to his brother, in letters
written during the spring of 1786, "as sincerely as ever I did;
and I tell our societies everywhere, * The Methodists will not
leave the Church, at least while I live.' " " Eight or ten
preachers, it is probable (but I have not met with one yet),
will say something about leaving the Church, before the
conference. It is not improbable many will be driven out of
it where there are Calvinist ministers."
Such were Wesley's wishes, and such were his apprehen-
sions. Wesley expected eight or ten of his preachers to
bring the business before conference. This was done by Dr.
47^ Life and Times of Wesley.
1786 Coke, who had returned from his episcopal tour in the United
_A^^3 States, Mr. Pawson writes :
" Dr. Coke thought, that our public services in the large towns ought
to be held in church hours, and was freely speaking in the conference
upon that subject, and urging its necessity from the fact that nearly all the
converted clergymen in the kingdom were Calvinists. Upon hearing
this, Mr. Charles Wesley, with a very loud voice, and in great anger, cried
out, ' No,' which was the only word he uttered during the whole of the
conference sittings. Mr. Mather, however, got up and confirmed what
Dr. Coke had said, which we all knew to be a truth." ^
This debate seems to have issued in the adoption of a
document, which Wesley drew up three days before the
conference met.
" In what cases do we allow of service in church hours ? I answer:
" r. When the minister is a notoriously wicked man.
" 2. When he preaches Arian, or any equally pernicious doctrine.
" 3. When there are not churches in the town sufficient to contain half
the people.
•"4. Where there is no church at all within two or three miles.
" We advise every one, who preaches in the church hours, to read the
psalms and lessons, with part of the church prayers ; because, we appre-
hend, this will endear the church service to our brethren, who probably
would be prejudiced against it, if they heard none but extemporary
prayer."
Considering the character of not a few of the ministers of
the Church of England in 1786 ; remembering the number of
pulpits from which were preached Arianism, and especially
Calvinism, both of which the Methodists considered . " per-
fiicious doctrines" \ and, further, bearing in mind the scanty
provision made by the Established Church for the great
populations, these concessions, in reference to having
Methodist services in church hours, were really much more
extensive than, at first sight, appears.
This was the last conference at which Charles Wesley was
present. At its conclusion, he preached from his favourite
text, " I will bring the third part through the fire;" and told
the congregation, that, after the death of himself and his
brother, there would be a split among the Methodists, and
not more than a third part of the preachers and of the people
* Unpublished manuscript.
Separation from the Church. 479
would remain faithful to the Established Church. Upon ^786
these, however, God would pour out His Spirit more abund- Age 83
antly than ever, and His work would prosper in their hands.
" This," said he, " was the case w^ith the Moravians when Count
Zinzendorf died. So it w^as when Mr. Whiteficld was removed;
and thus it will be with the Methodists." ^
Before the conference was concluded, Charles Wesley wrote
as follows to the Rev. Mr. Latrobe, Moravian minister in
London :
" My brother, and I, and the preachers were unanimous for continuing
in the old ship. The preachers of a Dissenting spirit will probably, after
our death, set up for themselves, and draw away disciples after them. An
old baptist minister, forty years ago, told me, he looked on the Methodists
as a seminary for the Dissenters. My desire and design, from the begin-
ning to this day, is, to leave them in the lap of their mother. The bishops
might, if they pleased, save the largest and soundest part of them back
into the Church ; perhaps to leaven the whole lump, as Archbishop Potter
said to me. But I fear, betwixt you and me, their lordships care fortiotte
0/ these tilings. The great evil, which I have dreaded for near fifty years,
is a schism." ^
Other matters were debated at the ' conference of 1786.
The old rules respecting the windows, doors, and pews of
chapels were to be strictly observed and kept ; and no assist-
ant was to allow collections for a new chapel, " till every step
had been taken to secure it, on the conference plan, by a trust
deed, a bond, or sufficient articles of agreement." And
Wesley concluded by giving the following advices to the
preachers, (i) To re-establish morning preaching, in all large
towns, at least ; and to exert themselves in restoring the
bands, and the select societies. (2) Always to conclude the
service in about an hour. (3) Never to scream. (4) Never
to lean upon, or beat the Bible. (5) Wherever they preached,
to meet the society. (6) Not to go home at nights, except
in cases of the utmost necessity. (7) Never to preach funeral
sermons, but for eminently holy persons, to preach none for
hire, and to beware of panegyric, particularly in London. (8)
To hold more lovcfeasts. (9) To introduce no new tunes ; to
see that none sing too slow, and that the women sing their
' Pawson's manuscripts.
2 Life of C. Wesley, by Jackson, vol. ii., p. 402.
480 Life and Times of Wesley.
1786 parts ; and to exhort all to sing, and all to stand at singing,
\ge83 as well as to kneel at prayers. (10) To let none repeat the
last line, unless the preacher does. And, (11) To inform the
leaders, that every assistant is to change both the stewards
and the leaders when he sees good ; and that no leader has
power to put any person either into or out of the society.
Nova Scotia, Newfoundland, and Antigua were now
Methodist circuits, and had, unitedly, nine itinerant preachers,
and 2179 members of society. These were Methodist mis-
sions, though not designated such. And here let it be re-
marked, that the Methodist Missionary Society was really
founded in 1784. Where is the proof of this.?
The following is an exact copy of a printed document,
kindly lent by the Rev. G. Mather, and addressed, by Dr.
Coke, to "The Rev. Mr. Fletcher, at Madeley, near Shiffnal,
Cheshire."
"A Plan of the Society for the Establishment of Missions among the
Heathen.
" I. Eveiy person who subscribes two guineas yearly, or more, is to be
admitted a member of the society.
" 2. A general meeting of the subscribers shall be held annually on the
last Tuesday in January.
" 3. The first general meeting shall be held on the last Tuesday in
January 1784, at No. 11, in West Street, near the Seven Dials, London,
at three o'clock in the afternoon.
" 4. At every general meeting, a committee of seven, or more, shall be
chosen, by the majority of the subscribers, to transact the business of the
society for the ensuing year.
" 5. The general meeting shall receive and examine the accounts of the
committee, for the preceding year, of all sums paid to the use of the
society, of the purposes to which the whole or any part thereof shall have
been applied, and also the report of all they have done, and the advices
they have received.
" 6. The committee, or the majority of them, shall have power: First,
to call in the sums subscribed, or any part thereof, and to receive all
collections, legacies, or other voluntary contributions. Secondly, to agree
with any they shall approve, who may offer to go abroad, either as mis-
sionaries, or in any civil employment. Thirdly, to procure the best in-
struction that can be obtained for such persons, in the language of the
country for which they are intended, before they go abroad. Fourthly,
to provide for their expenses, in going and continuing abroad, and for
their return home, after such time, and under such circumstances, as may
be thought most expedient. Fifthly, to print the Scriptures, or so much
thereof as the funds of the society may admit, for the use of any heathen
Fii'st MetJiodist Missionary Report. 48 1
country. And, sixthly, to do every other act which to them may appear
necessary, so far as the common stock of the society will allow, for car-
rying the design of the society into execution.
" 7. The committee shall keep an account of the subscribers' names,
and all sums received for the use of the society, together with such ex-
tracts of the entries of their proceedings, and advices, as may show those
who are concerned all that has been done both at home and abroad ;
which statement shall be signed by at least three of the committee.
" 8. The committee, for the new year, shall send a copy of the report
for the past year, to all the members of the society, who were not present
at the preceding general meeting, and (free of postage) to every clergy-
man, minister, or other person, from whom any collection, legacy, or other
benefaction shall have been received within the time concerning which
the report is made.
" 9. The committee, if they see it necessary, shall have power to choose
a secretary.
" 10. The committee shall, at no time, have any claim on the members of
the society, for any sum which may exceed the common stock of the society.
"N.B. Those who subscribe before the first general meeting, and to
whom it may not be convenient to attend, are desired to favour the
general meeting, by letter according to the above direction, with any
important remarks which may occur to them on the business, that the
subscribers present may be assisted, as far as possible, in settling the
rules of the society to the satisfaction of all concerned.
" We have been already favoured with the names of the following sub-
scribers, viz.
Dr. Coke ....
Rev. Mr. Simpson, Mac
clesfield ....
Rev. Mr. Bickerstaff, o
Leicester ....
Mr. Rose, of Dorking
Mr. Horton, of London
Mr. Ryley,
Mr. Riddsdale „ „
Mr. Jay, „ „
Mr. Dewey, „
Mr. Mandell, of Bath
Mr. Jaqucs, of Walling
ford
Mr. Butting, of Higl
Wycombe ....
Mr. John Clark, of New
port, in the Isle o
Wight
2
2 2
2 2
d.
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
I s. d.
Mr. Barton, of Isle of
Wight 220
Mr. Henry Brooke, of
Dublin 220
Master and Miss Blash-
ford, of Dublin ...440
Mrs. Kirkover, of Dublin 220
Mr. Smith, Russia mer-
chant, of London ..550
Mr. D'Olier, of Dublin .220
Mrs. Smyth, „ „ .220
The Rev. Mr. Fletcher,
of Madeley ....220
Miss Salmon ....220
]\Ir. Houlton, of London,
an occasional subscri-
ber 10 10 o
Mrs. King, of Dublin .220
Miss Eliza Johnson, of
Bristol 2
VOL. in.
^66 3 o
I I
1786
Age 83
482 Life and Times of Wesley.
1 786 " To all the real lovers of matikiinl.
pZr~Q^ "The present institution is so agreeable to the finest fechngs of piety.
'^ and benevolence, that little need be added for its recommendation. The
candid of every denomination, (even those who are entirely unconnected
with the Methodists, and are determined to be so,) will acknowledge the
amazing change which our preaching has wrought upon the ignorant and
uncivilised, at least, throughout these nations ; and they will admit, that
the spirit of a missionary must be of the most zealous, most devoted, and
self denying kind ; nor is anything more required to constitute a mis-
sionary for the heathen nations, than good sense, integrity, great piety,
and amazing zeal. Men, possessing all these qualifications in a high degree,
we have among us ; and we doubt not but some of these will accept of the
arduous undertaking, not counting their lives dear, if they may but pro-
mote the kingdom of Christ, and the present and eternal welfare of their
fellow creatures ; and we trust nothing shall be wanting, as far as time,
strength, and abilities will admit, to give the fullest and highest satisfaction
to the promoters of the plan, on the part of your devoted servants,
" Thomas Coke,
" Thomas Parker.
"Those who are willing to promote the institution are desired to send
their names, places of abode, and sums subscribed, to the Rev. Dr.
Coke, in London, or Thomas Parker, Esq., barrister at law, in York."
Such was the first Methodist missionary report ever pub-
lished. On the third page of the foHo sheet, from which the
above is taken, is the following in manuscript.
" Near Plymouth, January 6, 1784.
" My very dear Sir, — Lest Mr. Parker should neglect to send you
one of our plans for the establishment of foreign missions, I take the
liberty of doing it. Ten subscribers more, of two guineas per annum,
have favoured me with their names. \i you can get a few subscribers
more, we shall be obliged to you.
" We have now a very wonderful outpouring of the Spirit in the west
of Cornwall. I have been obliged to make a winter campaign of it, and
preach here and there out of doors.
" I beg my affectionate respects to Mrs. Fletcher, and entreat you to
' pray for your most aftectionate friend and brother,
"Thomas Coke."
A few months after the above report was sent to Fletcher,
Coke set sail to America, and returned only in time to attend
the English conference of 1785. Henceforward, Christian
missions absorbed his time and energies.
It is a well known fact, that Warren Hastings was the first
governor general of India; and that, in 1786, his celebrated
trial was commenced, and was protracted for nearly eight
Proposed Missions to India. 483
years, during which one hundred and forty days were spent ^2_
in its prosecution. Space forbids further remarks concerning Age 83
this great event ; but the excitement created in England by
the affairs of India had, doubtless, something to do with the
following correspondence between Dr. Coke and a gentleman
in that countr}'. Coke had written to him as early as 1784,
respecting the establishment of missions in India, and now
his correspondent replied. He sympathises with Coke's pro-
posal, but foresees the arduous character of the undertaking.
He writes: "The leading features in the character of the
Mahommedans are pride and cruelty, treachery and love of
power ; and those of the Hindoos, abject servility, cunning,
lying, dishonesty, and excessive love of money." " Humanly
speaking, the probabilities of converting either the Hindoos
or Mahommedans appear to be very small." Reasons are
assigned for this, showing the writer to be a well informed
and accomplished man. He proceeds to say: "The difficulties
are great ; greater it may be, in some respects, than were those
of the first preachers among the freer and more polished
people of the Roman empire. Nevertheless, the same Divine
power that then made a few obscure, and, for the most part,
unlearned men, triumph over the united resistance of the
spiritual, secular, and carnal powers of this world, remains
unchanged."
Coke answered this long and able letter, on January 25,
1786, and said :
" At present, our openings in America, and the pressing invitations we
have lately received from Nova Scotia, the West Indies, and the States,
call for all the help we can possibly afford our brethren in that quarter of
the world. The high esteem which the government has for Mr. Wesley,
I am well persuaded, would procure for us the assistance which you
think to be necessary ; but Mr. Wesley himself seems to have a doubt
whether that would be the most excellent way. In Great Britain, Ire-
land, and America, we have gone on what appears, at first sight at least,
to be a more evangelical plan. Our missionaries have not at all con-
cerned themselves with applications to the civil power. They have been
exact in their submission to all its laws, and laid themselves out in the
most extensive manner for God. It appears very expedient, that our
missionaries should visit the settlements of the Danish missionaries in
India, and take every step they can to improve themselves in the language
of the people. Mr. Wesley is of opinion that not less than half-a-dozen
should be at first sent on such a mission ; and, as soon as the present
484 Life and Times of Wesley.
1786 extraordinary calls from America are answered, I trust we shall be able to
. — ;, turn our thoughts to Bengal." ^
Age 83 o «
For want of means, India had to be abandoned ; but, in the
month of March, Coke issued " An Address to the Pious and
Benevolent, proposing an annual subscription for the support
of Missionaries in the Highlands and adjacent Islands of
Scotland, the isles of Jersey, Guernsey, and Newfoundland,
the West Indies, and the provinces of Nova Scotia and
Quebec ;" to which was prefixed the following letter by
Wesley.
"Bristol, JlTatrh 12, 1786.
" Dear Sir, — I greatly approve of your proposal, for raising a sub-
scription, in order to send missionaries to the highlands of Scotland, the
islands of Jersey and Guernsey, the Leeward Islands, Quebec, Nova
Scotia, and Newfoundland. It is not easy to conceive the extreme want
there is, in all these places, of men that will not count their lives dear unto
themselves, so they may testify the gospel of the grace of God.
" I am, dear sir, your affectionate brother,
" John Wesley," 2
Coke commenced his Address as follows.
"Deafly beloved in the Lord, — Some time past, I took the liberty of
addressing you, in behalf of a mission intended to be established in the
British dominions in Asia ; and many of you very generously entered
into that important plan. We have not, indeed, lost sight of it at present ;
on the contrary, we have lately received a letter of encouragement from a
principal gentleman in the province of Bengal. But the providence of
God has lately opened to us so many doors nearer home, that Mr.
Wesley thinks it imprudent to hazard, at present, the lives of any of our
preachers, by sending them to so great a distance, and amidst so many
uncertainties and difficulties ; when so large a field of action is afforded
us in countries to which we have so much easier admittance, and where
the success, through the blessing of God, is more or less certain."
He then explains the openings in the places already men-
tioned. The address is dated March 13, 1786.^
In this way, Methodist missions were fairly started ; and,
on September 24, 1786, Coke set sail, with Messrs. Hammet,
Warrener, and Clarke ; Warrener being intended for Antigua;
and Clarke and Hammet for Newfoundland.*
Messrs. Garretson and Black were already labouring in
^ Methodist Magazine, 1792, p. 333. 2 i\,\^^ jg^o, p. 574.
^Ibid. p. 577. ■* Coke's Life.
Age 83
Letters. 485
Nova Scotia, and, to them, Wesley addressed the following 1786
letters.
"London, September 2,0, 1786.
" My dear Brother,— I trust, before this comes to hand, you and
Dr. Coke will have met. I can exceedingly ill spare him from England,
as I have no clergyman capable of supplying his lack of service ; but I
was convinced he was more wanted in America than in Europe. I was
far off from London when he set sail. Most of those in England, who
have riches, love money, even the Methodists; at least, those who are
called so. The poor are the Christians. I am quite out of conceit with
almost all those who have this world's goods. Let us take care to lay up
treasure in heaven.
"John Wesley." *
^^ November 2,0, 1786.
"My dear Brother,— You have good reason to be thankful to God
that He lets you see the fruit of your labours. Whenever any are awakened,
you do well to join them together immediately. But I do not advise you to
go on too fast. It is not expedient to break up more ground than you
can keep ; to preach at any more places than you, or your brethren, can
constantly attend. To preach once in a place, and no more, very seldom
does any good ; it only alarms the devil and his children, and makes them
more upon their guard against a first assault.
"Wherever there is any church service, I do not approveof any appoint-
ment the same hour; because I love the Church of England, and would
assist, not oppose, it all I can. How do the inhabitants of Shelburne,
Halifax, and other parts of the province, go on as to temporal things ?
Have they trade ? Have they sufficiency of food, and the other neces-
saries of life ? And do they increase or decrease in numbers ? It seems
there is a scarcity of some things, — of good ink, for yours is so pale that
many of your words are not legible.
"As I take it for granted, that you have had several conversations with
Dr. Coke, I doubt not you proposed all your difficulties to him, and
received full satisfaction concerning them. Probably, we shall send a
little help for your building, if we live till conference. Observe the rules
for building laid down in the minutes. I am afraid of another American
revolution
"John Wesley." 2
Both the above were addressed to Garretson ; the following
was sent to Black.
" London, November 26, 1 786.
"My dear Brother, — It is indeed a matter of joy, that our Lord is
still carrying on His work throughout Great Britain and Ireland. In the
time of Dr. Jonathan Edwards, there were several gracious showers in
* Wesley's Works, voL xiii., p. 67. ^ Ibid.
Age 83
486 Life and Times of Wesley.
1786 New England ; but there were large intermissions between one and an-
other : whereas, with us there has been no intermission at all for seven-
and-forty years, but the work of God has been continually increasing.
" The same thing, I am in hopes, you will now see in America likewise.
See that you expect it, and that you seek it in His appointed ways, namely,
with fasting and linintermitted prayer. And take care that you be not
at all discouraged, though you should not always have an immediate
answer. You know
' His manner and His times are best.'
Therefore pray always ! Pray, and faint not. I commend you all to our
Great Shepherd ; and am your affectionate brother,
"John Wesley." ^
Wesley's correspondence is so vast, that selection is diffi-
cult; but two or three other letters, written in 1786, may be
given here. The first was sent to Mr. Lawrence Frost, of
Liverpool, with a request that it might be handed to the
mayor, and has not been previously published. One of
Wesley's preachers had been interrupted while preaching to a
large multitude, near the old Fishstones, and Wesley wrote to
the chief magistrate as follows.
" To the Mayor of Liverpool.
"Bristol, July 29, 1786.
"Sir, — Some preachers, in connection with me, have thought it their
duty to call sinners to repentance even in the open air. If they have
violated any law thereby, let them suffer the penalty of that law. But,
if not, whoever molests them on that account will be called to answer it
in his majesty's court of King's Bench. I have had a suit already in
that court, with a magistrate (Heap), and, if I am forced to it, am ready
to commence another.
" I am, sir, your obedient servant,
"John Wesley."
The letter was effectual. Ever afterwards, the constables
were civil, and wisely let the Methodists alone.
William Simpson was one of Wesley's itinerants, and, at
this time, was assistant in the Tliirsk circuit, where he had to
contend with troubles somewhat different to those at Liver-
pool, but for which Wesley prescribed as sharp a remedy. In
the month of November, he wrote him as follows.
" The Sunday preaching may continue at Jervas for the present. I
^ Memoirs of Black, p. 158.
Age Sj
Wesley s ''Studying Hours.'" 487
- V.
suppose the society at Jervas is as large as that at Northallerton; and 1786
this is a point which is much to be considered.
" You must needs expel out of the society at Knaresborough those that
will be contentious. When you have to do with those stubborn spirits, it
is absolutely necessary, either to mend them or end them : and ten persons
of a quiet temper are better than thirty contentious ones. Undoubtedly
some of the eloquent men will be sending me heavy complaints. It is
well, therefore, that you spoke first.
" I am, dear Billy, your affectionate friend and brother,
" John Wesley." ^
We must now return to Wesley's journal. A week after
the conclusion of the Bristol conference, he set sail for
Holland, accompanied by Messrs. Broadbent and Bracken-
bury. There he mingled with many Christian friends ; gave
many Scripture expositions in private houses; saw many
scenes of beauty ; and employed all his leisure hours in
writing. On September 5, he returned to London, where he
spent two days in preaching and answering letters; and then
set off to Bristol, where he continued till September 26,
when he got back to London, and naively wrote : " I now
applied myself in earnest to the writing of Mr. Fletcher's life,
having procured the best materials I could. To this I dedi-
cated all the time I could spare, till November, from five in
the morning till eight at night. These are my studying
hours ; I cannot write longer in a day without hurting my
eyes." We should think not ! Fifteen hours a day of uninter-
mitting labour in the case of a man eighty-three years of age !
" Once or twice," he wrote on December 12, " Once or twice, I
have been a little out of order this autumn ; but it was only
for a day or two at a time. In general, my health has been
better for these last ten years, than it ever was for ten years
together since I was born. Ever since that good fever, which
I had in the north of Ireland, I have had, as it were, a new
constitution. All my pains and aches have forsaken me, and
I am a stranger even to weariness of any kind. This is
the Lord's doing, and it may well be marvellous in all our
'^ 2
eyes.
At the beginning of October, he went on a preaching excur-
sion to Chatham and Sheerness. Then he set off to Norfolk;
^ Wesley's Works, vol. xiii., pp. 86, 87. ^ Ym^_ vol. xiii., p. 92.
48 8 Life and Times of Wesley,
1786 and, on his way back to town, preached Mrs. Shewell's funeral
A^8^ sermon at Barnet. At this period, the father of the late
Rev. Dr. Leifchild was the chief Methodist in Barnet, and the
doctor himself a little boy. " Upon arriving," wrote this dis-
tinguished minister, "he drove to my father's house; and, when
the door of his carriage was opened, he came out arrayed in
his canonicals. Childlike, I ran to lay hold of him, but my
father pulled me back ; upon which, extending his hand, he
said: 'Suffer little children to come unto me, and forbid
them not, for of such is the kingdom of heaven.' "
The next five weeks were spent in London, partly in
preaching, partly in meeting classes, and partly in writing
Fletcher's Life. The only holiday he took was a trip to
Hampton Court, which he pronounced " the finest palace the
king of England had " ; but even this was scarcely a holiday,
for he preached at Wandsworth on his way back to town.
He had a brush with the Deptford Methodists, who urgently
requested to be allowed to have service in the Methodist
chapel at the same time as there was service in the church.
"It is easy to see," he writes, "that this would be a formal
separation from the Church. We fixed both our morning and
evening service, all over England, at such hours as not to
interfere with the Church ; with this very design, — that those
of the Church, if they chose it, might attend both the one and
the other. But to fix it at the same hour is obliging them to
separate either from the Church or us ; and this I judge to be,
not only inexpedient, but totally unlawful for me to do."
This style of reasoning can only be harmonized with the
enactments of the previous conference, on the supposition
that the Church minister at Deptford was not such as Wesley
then described.
Wesley concluded the year by preaching from, " Set
thy house in order," and, among other things, strongly
exhorted the people to make their wills.
Except the Life of Fletcher, i2mo, 227 pages, Wesley
seems to have published nothing, in 1786, but his Arminian
Magazine, 8vo, 688 pages.
The volume bears the same character as previous ones.
There are again six original sermons by Wesley : the
Church ; Divine Providence ; Schism ; Friendship with the
JVeskys Publications, in i 7S6. 489
World; Visiting the Sick; and the Eternity of God. The ^7^6
sermon on the Church was a sermon for the times ; and, Age 83
remembering the agitation among the Methodists on the
subject of separation, an extract here will not be out of
place.
"The catholic, or universal, church is all the persons in the universe,
whom God hath so called out of the world, as to be one body, united by
one Spirit, having one faith, one hope, one baptism ; one God and Father
of all, who is above all, and through all, and in them all. That part of
this great body, of the universal church, which inhabits any one kingdom
or nation, we may properly term a italioiial church, as the Church of
France, the Church of England, the Church of Scotland. A smaller part,
of the universal church, are the Christians that inhabit any city or town,
as the church of Ephesus. Two or three Christian brethren united to-
gether are a church in the narrowest sense. Such was the church in the
house of Philemon, and that in the house of Nymphas. A particular
church may, therefore, consist of any number of members, whether two
or three, or two or three millions. But still, whether they be larger or
smaller, the same idea is to be preserved. They are one body, and have
one Spirit, one Lord, one hope, one faith, one baptism, one God and
Father of all."
One more extract, from the Magazine for 1786, must suffice.
Addressing those afflicted with lowness of spirits, Wesley-
writes:
" I. Sacredly abstain from all spirituous liquors. Touch them not, on
any pretence whatever. To others they may sometimes be of use; but to
nervous persons they are deadly poison.
" 2. If you drink any, drink but little tea, and none at all without eating,
or without sugar and cream.
" 3. Every day of your life, take, at least, an hour's exercise, between
breakfast and dinner.
" 4. Take no more food than nature requires. Dine upon one thing,
except pudding or pie. Eat no flesh at supper; but something light and
easy of digestion.
" 5. Sleep early, and rise early. Unless you are ill, never lie in bed
much above seven hours. Then you will never lie awake ; your flesh will
be firm, and your spirits lively.
" 6. Above all, beware of anger ! beware of worldly sorrow ! beware of
the fear that hath torment ! beware of foolish and hurtful desires ! beware
of inordinate affection!"
1787.
^ll^ ^T LESLEY writes :
Age S4 VV "1787. Monday, January i — We began the service at four in
the morning, to an unusually large congregation. We had another com-
fortable opportunity at the new chapel at the usual hour, and a third in
the evening at W^est Street."
" January 2 — I went to Deptford ; but it seemed, I was got into a den
of lions. Most of the leading men of the society were mad for separating
from the Church. I endeavoured to reason with them, but in vain : they
had neither sense nor even good manners left. At length, after meeting
the whole society, I told them: ' If you are resolved, you may have your
service in church hours; but, remember, from that time, you will see my
face no more.' This struck deep ; and, from that hour, I have heard no
more of separating from the Church."
Considering the steps that Wesley had already taken, this
is somewhat amusing ; as are also the two following letters,
written soon after, the first to William Percival,' and the '
second to Samuel Bardsley,
" London, February 17, 1787.
" Dear Billy, — You cannot be too watchful against evil speaking, or
too zealous for the poor Church of England. I commend sister Percival
for having her child baptized there, and for returning public thanks. By
all means, go to church as often as you can, and exhort all the Methodists
so to do. They that are enemies to the Church are enemies to me. I
am a friend to it, and ever was. By our reading prayers, we prevent our
people contracting an hatred for forms of prayer ; which would naturally
be the case, if wc always prayed extempore.
" I am, dear Billy, your affectionate brother,
" John Wesley." 2
"Birmingham, Matrh 25, 1787.
" Dear Sammy, — Brother Jackson should advise brother Ridall,^ not
to please the devil by preaching himself to death. I still think, when the
Methodists leave the Church of England, God will leave them. Every
year more and more of the clergy are convinced of the truth, and grow
^ Percival was one of the itinerant preachers at Newcastle on Tyne.
- Methodist Magazine, 1834, p. 674.
2 Bardsley's colleagues in Colne circuit.
Age 84
Wesley begging for the Poor. 49 1
well affected towards us. It would be contrary to all common sense, as 1787
well as to good conscience, to make a separation now.
" I am, dear Sammy, your affectionate brother,
"John Wesley." ^
Before proceeding with Wesley's history, we insert another
letter belonging to this period. It is now for the first time
published, and refers to John Hutchinson, the founder of
Hutchinsonianism.
" London, Febfuaty 4, 1787.
"My dear Sister, — I think Mr. Hutchinson was a man of strong
understanding, but greatly obscured by uncommon pride and sourness of
temper. He was the twin soul of Dr. Bentley. Many of his remarks I
exceedingly approve of. That upon the sin of Uzzah is highly probable.
His writings to me are far more agreeable than those of Dr. Harmer ;2
an exceeding pretty writer, who seems to propose Dr. Blair for his
pattern. Both the one and the other are quite too elegant for me. Give
me plain, strong Dr. Home. Your letters (as well as your conversation)
are always agreeable to, my dear sister,
" Your affectionate friend and brother,
"J. Wesley."
Wesley was always ready for all kinds of useful work, —
reading, writing, preaching, praying, and begging for the poor.
Towards the close of his career, especially, he seems to
have commenced almost every year by an effort to relieve
the miseries of his destitute fellow creatures. Accordingly,
at the opening of 1787, five days were spent in traversing the
streets of London to obtain subscriptions for this purpose.
About two hundred members of his own London society were
in great distress; and he hoped to provide for them and for
others, at least, food and clothing. He writes : " I was much
disappointed. Six or seven, indeed, of our brethren, gave
;^iO apiece. If forty or fifty had done this, I could have
carried my design into execution. However, much good was
done with i^200, and many sorrowful hearts made glad."
Seven years previous to this, Wesley had preached his
first sermon at Newark upon Trent. He was now invited to
open a new chapel there; and took coach, for that purpose,
on February 9, travelled all night, and arrived next day. On
^ Manuscript letter in British Museum.
^ Dr. Harmer had recently published vols. iii. and iv. of his " Observa-
tions on various Passages of Scripture."
492 Life and Times of Wesley.
1787 Sunday morning, February 11, at nine o'clock, he preached
■^^^8^ in the " hghtsome, cheerful building " ; and again at half-
past five in the afternoon ; when the mayor and several alder-
men of the town were present.
This was a kind of service which now frequently fell to
Wesley's lot. On Sunday, February 25, after preaching
twice in London, he took the mail coach, and, by travelling
all night, arrived at Exeter in about four-and-twenty hours.
He then hurried off to Plymouth, and opened a new chapel
there. On Sunday morning, March 4, he conducted a service,
which lasted from half-past nine to nearly one o'clock ; and, in
the evening, the throng was such, that, in order to reach the
pulpit, he was literally lifted over the people's heads. At five
o'clock next morning, the chapel was again crowded ; and, at
six, he departed by coach, " leaving," says he, " such a flame
behind us as was never kindled here before."
Notwithstanding the heavy services of the previous day, he
travelled all the way to Exeter in a continuous rain, and
again preached " to as many as could possibly squeeze " into
the chapel ; and says, " I know not, that I ever saw such an
impression made on the people of Exeter before."
After this, he proceeded to Bristol, where "the work of
God had much increased, especially among the young men,^'
but where, out of sixteen hundred members, only five, or ten,
or, at the most, a dozen hearers formed the five o'clock morning
congregations. Wesley says, he strongly warned them of
their indolence ; and, during his stay, the congregations were
increased to three hundred ; but even this was small, con-
sidering the prestige of the place, and the fame of the
unequalled minister.
Wesley now was suffering considerable anxiety respecting
Dr. Coke, who, with his three missionaries, had set sail, five
months before, for Newfoundland, but who, unknown to
Wesley, had been drifted to the West Indies. Hence the
following, addressed to William Black.
" London, Februaty 20, 1787.
" My dear Brother, — After various unfortunate hindrances and
delays. Dr. Coke embarked on board a small brig, in the middle of
October, and was, by furious winds, twice beat back into the harbour.
They set sail a third time, with a crazy, shattered vessel, on the i8th of
Revival at Biirslnn. 493
October. We have not heard anything either from him or of him since. ^7^7
I hope you have heard of him in America. Ace84
"You have great reason to be thankful to God for the progress of His
work in Nova Scotia. This is far from being the case in Newfoundland,
where poor John McGeary appears to be utterly discouraged ; not only
through want of success, but through want of the conveniences, yea,
necessaries of life. Truly, if I could have supposed, that those who made
me fair promises would have suffered a preacher to want bread, I should
have sent him into other parts, where he would have wanted nothing.
" I hear very different accounts of the state of your provinces. Is there
plenty or scarcity in Nova Scotia, and New England ? How does it fare
with Halifax and Shelburne, in particular ? Do the buildings and people
increase or decrease 1 Public accounts I cannot at all depend upon ;
but upon_;w/r word I can depend. Peace be with all your spirits !
" I am, dear Billy, your affectionate friend and brother,
"John Wesley." »
On March 19, Wesley left Bristol for Ireland, preaching on
the way at Stroud, Cirencester, Gloucester, and numerous
other places. At Birmingham, he administered the sacrament
to seven or eight hundred communicants. At Wolverhamp-
ton, he opened a new chapel. At Burslem, he held one of the
most remarkable lovefeasts he had ever witnessed ; for here
there had been "such an outpouring of the Spirit as had not
been in any other part of the kingdom ; particularly in the
meetings for prayer. Fifteen or twenty had been justified in
a day ; some of them the most notorious, abandoned sinners,
in all the country." He " appointed to preach at five in the
morning of March 30, but, soon after four, he was saluted by
a concert of music, both vocal and instrumental, making the
air ring, with a hymn to the tune of Judas Maccabeus. It
was," says he, " a good prelude ; so I began almost half an
hour before five ; yet the house was crowded both above and
below."
He writes : "Saturday, March 31 — I went onto Maccles-
field, and found a people still alive to God, in spite of swiftly
increasing riches. If they continue so, it will be the only
instance I have known, in above half a century. I warned
them in the strongest terms I could, and believe some of them
had ears to hear."
He arrived in Dublin on Good Friday, April 6. On Easter
' Black's Memoirs, p. 185.
494 Life and Times of Wesley.
^787 Sunday he preached in Bethesda chapel, of which his friend,
Age 84 the Rev. Edward Smyth, was chaplain. He writes : " Mr.
Smyth read prayers, and gaye out the hymns, which were
sung by fifteen or twenty fine singers ; the rest of the congre-
gation listening with much attention, and as much devotion,
as they would have done to an opera. But is this Christian
worship ? Or ought it ever to be suffered in a Christian
church .-* It was thought we had between seven and eight
hundred communicants."
At this period, the Dublin society, with the exception of
that in London, was the largest in the world, containing
upwards of elev^en hundred members, being more than there
were in the whole of the five Dublin circuits in 1870!
Having spent ten days in Dublin, he set out for the pro-
vinces. It would be, substantially, a reiteration of former
narratives, to follow him in his wanderings. He met with no
persecution ; but, on the contrary, with the warmest welcomes.
Almost everywhere the work of God was prospering ; and the
people vied with each other to show him kindness. He writes:
" May 29 — The old murderer is restrained from hurting me ;
but it seems he has" power over my horses. One of them I
was obliged to leave in Dublin, and afterwards another, having
bought two to supply their places ; the third soon got an ugly
swelling in his shoulders, so that we doubted whether we
could go on ; and a boy at Clones, riding, I suppose galloping,
the fourth over stones, the horse fell and nearly lamed him-
self." Perhaps Wesley blamed the devil Avhen he ought to
have blamed his own long journeys.
It was in one of these Irish tours that, preaching at a
certain place in the afternoon, and being expected, in the
evening, at a town several miles distant, he desired his chaise
to be ready at the close of the service, so that he might
start at once. As he left the chapel, the people, as usual,
crowded about him, to shake hands with him ; among others,
a Methodist shoemaker pressed forward, and put into his
hand a brown paper parcel, saying with manifest emotion :
" Sir, this may be of use to you in your journey." Wesley
thanked him, put the parcel into his pocket, and away he
went. After travelling some distance, his curiosity prompted
him to examine the nature of Crispin's present, which he
Howar'd, the Philanthropist. 495
found to be an awl and a strong waxed thread. The road 1787
was rugged and lonely ; and after a sudden jerk, the horses Age 84
stopped. " What 's the matter .> " asked Wesley. " Matter
enough!" replied the coachman; "one of the traces is
broken, and we can't go on." Wesley bethought him of
his awl and thread ; they were at once produced ; the trace
was mended ; and so, by the poor shoemaker's gift, the
congregation was saved from being disappointed of their
preacher, and Wesley from a tiresome detention in a houseless
neighbourhood.^
Wesley got back to Dublin on the 21st of June, having
preached considerably more than a hundred times during his
ten weeks' tour. A week later, on his birthday, June 28, he
wrote : " I had the pleasure of a conversation with Mr.
Howard, I think one of the greatest men in Europe. No-
thing, but the mighty power of God, can enable him to go
through his difficult and dangerous employments."
The great philanthropist was as much pleased with Wesley,
as Wesley was with him. " I was encouraged by him," said
he to Alexander Knox, Esq., " to go on vigorously with my
own designs. I saw in him how much a single man might
achieve by zeal and perseverance ; and I thought, why may
not I do as much in my way, as Mr. Wesley has done in his,
if I am only as assiduous and persevering } and I deter-
mined I would pursue my work wath more alacrity than
ever. •*
Howard, in early life, had heard Wesley preach, in Bedford-
shire, and was deeply impressed with his discourse. In 1789,
he called at Wesley's house, in London, to present him with
his latest publication, "An Account of the Principal Lazar-
ettos in Europe," in quarto ; but Wesley was not at home.
" Present," said he, " my respects and love to Mr. Wesley ;
tell him, I had hoped to have seen him once more : perhaps,
we may meet again in this world, but, if not, we shall meet I
trust in a better."^ And away he went on his mission of
mercy to Russia, where he fell an honoured victim to his
benevolence, on January 20, 1790.
' Memoirs of Burgess.
2 Life of Henry Moore, p. 271. ^ Ibid. p. 272.
496 Life and Times of Wesley.
1 7^7 Having held his Irish conference, Wesley preached his
Age 84 farewell sermon, in Dublin, on the nth of July; and arriving
in England on the 12th, he proceeded to Manchester, in the
neighbourhood of which he continued until August 6. Here
he held his English conference, though, in his journal, he never
mentions it. The preachers were specially invited ; but, on
what principle the invitations were given, it is difficult to state.
Thomas Taylor was assistant at Leeds, within fifty miles of
Manchester, and moreover was one of the hundred mentioned
in Wesley's deed of declaration ; but he was also in favour of
the Methodists having the sacraments from the hands of their
own preachers ; in other words, he was in favour of separation
from the Established Church ; and, perhaps, this was one
of the reasons why he was not invited to the conference at
Manchester. At all events, he writes :
" Mr. Wesley has sent his special summons to each preacher whom he
wishes to attend conference, and has expressly forbidden any one else to
go. I am unbidden, and think I am ill used. After labouring, with some
degree of success, for more than twenty-four years, and without a crime
having ever been alleged against me, I am debarred of a privilege
granted to others who were converted under me, and whom I took into
society. This is a flagrant injustice. Besides, I am a member of the
legal conference. I'll venture to go, let consequences be what they may.
If I am thrown overboard, I will swim as well as I can, believing the
Lord will take me up."
Mr. Taylor's complaint was not without reason. He went ;
but says, he had little satisfaction, for much of the time was
spent in trying to supersede the hymn-book published by
Robert Spence.^
The original edition of the minutes of the Manchester
conference is now before us, i2mo, 20 pages ; but there is
not a single syllable on what was the great question of the
day, separation from the Church. And yet this was a
question again and again introduced. Two years before,
Wesley had ordained Pawson for Scotland, and, ever since,
had addressed him as "reverend," Pawson wearing gown
and bands, and administering the sacraments to the Scottish
Methodists. Now that Pawson was brought back to England,
he had to dofif his canonicals, and had his letters from Wesley
* Manuscript journal.
Separation from the C/mrck. 497
inscribed with " Mr.," instead of " Rev." He loudly remon- 1787
strated ; but got no redress ; and at length, like a good ^~g
Christian, more anxious to save souls than to wear sacerdotal
robes, submitted to obey orders which were strangely incon-
sistent with Wesley's ordaining acts, and went on his way
rejoicing. Pawson writes as follows, to his bosom friend,
Charles Atmore.
"Thorner, August 8, 1787.
" My very dear Brother,— Our conference ended on last Saturday.
There were many preachers, and abundance of people, I think more than
I ever saw at any conference before. Almost the whole time was taken
up with temporal affairs. Mr. Wesley was in great haste, as he and Dr.
Coke were going to Guernsey and Jersey. There has been a general
revival of the work of God. Mr. Wesley seems more determined to abide
in the Church than ever. He talked about it again and again, in the
public conference, in the society, etc. ; and in such a hot, fiery spirit, as I
did not like to see. He talked of fighting with a flail, and of putting all
out of society who do not go to church. IVe are to be just what we were
before we came to Scotland, — no sacraments, no gowns, no nothing at all
of any kind whatsoever. With much entreaty, 1 got him to ordain Mr.
McAUum and Suter. Two more were ordained, one for the West Indies,
and one for Nova Scotia.
" Charles Wesley, the Sunday before the conference opened, spoke, to
the society in London, to this effect : ' I told you, forty years ago, that,
from among yourselves, grievous wolves would arise, who would rend and
tear the flock. You now see my words fulfilled. These self created
bishops, and self made priests, are the very men. But I charge you all,
in the presence of God, never receive the sacrament from any of them.' '
So you see, he has discharged the people from receiving the sacrament
of his own brother; for who but he is the self created bishop? O cursed
prejudice ! O furious bigotiy ! How does the fire from hell burn in that
poor miserable man's breast !
" Perhaps, if I live till next conference, I may petition to return to
Scotland, as there seems to be no prospect of doing anything, but just in
the old way, while Mr. Wesley lives. Solomon says, there is no new thing
under the sun ; but here we see something, which, I believe, was never
' In his " Short Hymns on Select Passages of the Holy Scriptures,"
published in 1762, Charles Wesley wrote, concerning the poor itinerants:
" Raised from the people's lowest lees.
Guard, Lord, Thy preaching witnesses,
Nor let their pride the honour claim
Of sealing covenants in Thy name:
Rather than suffer them to dare
Usurp the priestly character,
Save from the arrogant offence,
And snatch them uncorrupted hence."
(Hymn on Numbers xvi. 10.) "Wesley Poetry," vol. ix., p. 79,
VOL. in. K K
49^ Life and Times of Wesley.
1787 seen in the Christian church before, — that men, approved of God and
AccSa ^^^^^^ brethren, and that for many years, should be regularly ordained, and
act in the capacity of ministers, and yet should be deposed from that
office by one single man, and that without any crime committed, great
or small, real or pretended. Even the pope himself never acted such
a part as this. What an astonishing degree of power does our aged
father and friend exercise! However, I am satisfied, and have nothing
but love in my heart toward the good old man. But really it will not
bear the light at all. Most affectionately yours,
"John Pawson."^
This was pretty strong to come from a man like Pavvson ;
but it furnishes a glimpse of the proceedings of the conference
of 1787, concerning which so little has been written, and
shows the awkward position into which Wesley had put
himself by his ordinations of men from whom he now with-
drew the authority that he had previously given.
Never, however, had Methodism been so prosperous as
now. The increase of members, in the United Kingdom,
during the present year, was nearly four thousand ; and in
America, 6849. Letters, dated August, 1787, contain most
marvellous intelligence. It was computed that, in Brunswick
county, Virginia, not fewer than seven thousand persons
were under deep conviction of their sin and danger ; and
as many as fifty in a day were savingly converted. At
a recent quarterly meeting, six thousand were assembled,
and hundreds were crying for mercy, including some of the
principal inhabitants of the land, and not a few who had
been persecutors.^
^ Manuscript letter.
2 Methodist Magazine, 1788, p. 486. It is only fair to add that all was
not sunshine in America. At the conference of 1784, the American
preachers had recorded a declaration that, "during the life of Mr. Wesley
they were ready to obey his commands in matters belonging to church
government"; but, in 1787, and thenceforward, this declaration was
omitted from their printed minutes. Why ? Because Wesley, without
consulting them, had changed the time and place of holding their con-
ference, and had appointed Richard Whatcoat to be co-superintendent
with Francis Asbury. — (Etheridge's Life of Coke, p. 173.) Dr. Coke was
present, and, in a letter printed four years afterwards, pronounced this an
"excommunication" of Wesley, and declared that, in his opinion, it
hastened Wesley's death ; for, " from the time he was informed of it, he
began to hang down his head, and to think he had lived long enough." —
(" Impartial Statement of the known Inconsistencies of Rev. Dr. Coke."
By William Hammet : 1792.) We gravely doubt the correctness of Dr.
Coke's opinion.
Sir Robert Peel. 499
The Manchester conference concluded on Saturday, 1787
August 4, and, on the following day, besides meeting the Age 84
select society, Wesley preached twice, and, with the assist-
ance of his brother clergymen, administered the sacrament to
twelve or thirteen hundred communicants. There are two
other incidents, in connection with this conference, too inter-
esting to be omitted.
At this period, the grandfather of the present Sir Robert
Peel was thirty-seven years of age, and one of the most
successful men in Lancashire. The leisure of his youthful
days had been spent in reading and study, and, before he
attained to his majority, a great portion of his time had been
devoted to the improvement of machinery. At the age of
twenty-three, he embarked in the cotton trade, and, by his
industry and perseverance, had already become a man of
wealth, though his riches fell immensely short of the two
millions which, it is said, he left behind him at his death in
1830. Wesley writes : " i/S/, July 27 — I was invited to
breakfast at Bury, by Mr. Peel, a calico printer ; who, a few
years ago, began with ;^S00, and is now supposed to have
gained ^^50,000. Oh, what a miracle if he lose not his soul!"
The invitation was accepted, and, long after this, when the
calico printer had become a baronet, and had entered par-
liament, Wesley's visit was one of the pleasing reminiscences
of his remarkable career. To the end of life, he cherished a
warm affection for the Methodists. " Mj/ lads," said he, when
some of his Methodist workmen applied to him for the sit2 of
Tamworth chapel,^ " My lads, do not build your chapel too
large, for people like to go to a little chapel well filled better
than to a larger one comparatively empty. I often go to
your . chapels in Manchester, Liverpool, and London, and
have no wish to find myself alone in a large pew, and pointed
at as Sir Robert Peel. I have left most of my works in
Lancashire under the management of Methodists, and they
serve me excellently well. When I resided there, I asked
Mr. Wesley, at one of his conferences, to come and breakfast
with me ; and he agreed, on condition that he might bring
some of his children with hr.:. Of course, I consented,
* Wesley Banner^ '^SOj p. 114-
500 Life and Times of Wesley.
1787 and he came accompanied by six-and-thirty of his itinerant
Age~84 preachers." This was a curious episode in the history both
of Wesley and the founder of the distinguished family that
bears his name.
No man in the nation took a greater interest in the institu-
tion of Sunday-schools than Wesley. " I am glad," said he,
to Richard Rodda, in a letter dated January 17, 1787, " I am
glad you have -taken in hand that blessed work of setting up
Sunday-schools in Chester. It seems, these will be one great
means of reviving religion throughout the nation. I Avonder
Satan has not sent out some able champion against them." ^
It was three years since Raikes had first called attention
to the importance of Sunday-schools in the Gloucester
Journal ; and already these " nurseries for Christians " had
I begun to dot and to adorn the country. That at Chester
j) altogether originated with the Chester Methodists, though
the rules were submitted to the bishop of the diocese, and
had his entire approval. It contained nearly seven hundred
children, who were taken to church once every Sunday.
" We had no intention," said Richard Rodda, " as some
persons represented, to make disciples to Methodism, but to
train them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord,
that they might become useful members of civil and religious
society."^
Some idea may be formed of the popularity of this new
institution of the Christian church, from the fact that, in
1785, a Sunday-school society was formed, which, within two
years, was the means of establishing more than two hundred
schools ; and that it was calculated, in 1787, that the num-
ber of children then taught in Sunday-scliools exceeded two
hundred thousand."^
As already stated, more than once, there were a few which
existed long before Raikes' school at Gloucester, — as, for
instance, Miss Hannah Ball's, at Wycombe, founded in 1769.
ij There was also another at Little Lever, the birthplace of
Oliver Heywood, four miles from Bolton, in Lancashire. Here
James Hey resided, a poor man who obtained a living by
winding bobbins for weavers. About the year I77S> James
^ Methodist Magazine, 1846, p. 562. "^ Ibid. ^ j^ij^ p_ ^g^.
Siinday-scJiools. 501
got the use of a room in a cottage, to which, twice every 1787
Sunday, he summoned the boys and girls of the neighbour- k^%>
hood, to teach them reading, his substitute for a bell being an
old brass mortar and pestle. ]\Ir. Adam Crompton, the paper
manufacturer, sent him a supply of books ; three branch
establishments were formed ; subscriptions were given ; and a
shilling per Sunday paid to each teacher for his Sunday
services.'
In June 1785, a Methodist school was started in the old
Ridgway Gates chapel, Bolton, chiefly through the instru-
mentality of George Eskrick, who was its principal manager as
long as he lived. One of the scholars present, the first Sunday,
was Peter Haslam, eleven years of age, afterwards a most
devout and useful itinerant preacher,- — the first fruits of others
w^ho, in the same institution, received their first trainings for the
Christian ministry. In the course of a few years, the number
of scholars, attending the Bolton Sunday-school, was 2,000 ;
and the average number, for the first thirty years of its exist-
ence, was 1800.^ Children came to it, several miles, from all
the country round about. Reading and WTiting were taught.
Each class was spoken to separately every Sunday on
religious subjects. The masters were devoted to their work,
and all gave their services gratuitously. The change in the
manners and morals of the children was marvellous ; and
about a hundred of them sang like seraphs.* No wonder,
that such a school attracted the attention of Wesley. Hence,
on the very day when he and six-and-thirty of his itinerants
breakfasted with the father of the Peels, he wrote :
" From Mr. Peel's we went to Bolton. Here are eight hundred poor
children, taught in our Sunday-schools, by about eighty masters, who
receive no pay but what they are to receive from their Great Master,
About a hundred of them, part boys and part girls, are taught to sing ;
and they sang so true, that, all singing together, there seemed to be but
one voice. The house was throughly filled, while I explained and
applied the first commandment. What is all morality or religion without
^ Methodist Magazine, 1836, p. 286. The Rev. Uavid Simpson, also, is
said to have commenced Sunday-schools, in Macclesfield, as early as the
year 1778. — {Evajigelical Magazine, 1842, p. 84.)
2 Methodist Magazine, 1805, p. i. ^ Manuscript letter.
4 Methodist Magazine, 1 788, p. 490.
502 Life cind Times of Wesley.
17*^7 this? A mere castle in the air. In the evening, many of the children
eC'^ 8a ^'■'^^ hovering round the house, I desired forty or fifty to come in and sing,
' Vital spark of heavenly flame.' Although some of them were silent, not
being able to sing for tears, yet the harmony was such as I believe could
not be equalled in the king's chapel."
This was not bounce, nor was it the random garrulity of an
aged man. Nine months afterwards, Wesley came again, and
wrote :
" This I must avow, there is not such another set of singers in any of
the Methodist congregations in the three kingdoms as there is at Bolton.
There cannot be ; for we have near a hundred such trebles, — boys and
girls, selected out of our Sunday-schools, and accurately taught — as are
not to be found together in any chapel, cathedral, or music room within
the four seas. Besides, the spirit with which they all sing, and the beauty
of many of them, so suits the melody, that I defy any to exceed it ;
except the singing of angels in our Father's house."
Good singing is a good thing, and, like most other good
things, is far from being common. Had this been the only
result of Bolton Sunday-school, the school would have existed
to good purpose. But hear Wesley's description, written
"Sunday, April 20, 1788," and let Methodist Sunday-school
teachers now conscientiously and diligently endeavour to
make their establishments resemble that at Bolton then.
"At eight, and at one, the house was throughly filled. About three, I
met between 900 and a thousand of the children belonging to our Sunday-
schools. I never saw such a sight before. They were all exactly clean,
as well as plain, in their apparel. All were serious and well behaved.
Many, both boys and girls, had as beautiful faces as, I believe, England
or Europe can afford. When they all sung together, and none of them
out of tune, the melody was beyond that of any theatre ; and, what is the
best of all, many of them truly fear God, and some rejoice in His salvation.
These are a pattern to all the town. Their usual diversion is to visit the
poor that are sick, (sometimes six, or eight, or ten together,) to exhort,
comfort, and pray with them. Frequently ten or more of them get
together to sing and pray by themselves ; sometimes thirty or forty ; and
are so earnestly engaged, alternately singing, praying, and crying, that
they know not how to part."
We have already stated that, the day after Wesley closed
his conference at Manchester, he preached twice, and, assisted
by others, administered the Lord's supper to twelve or
thirteen hundred persons. The next day, August 6, he secured
the whole of the coach, that run between Manchester and
A Coach Load of Methodist Preachers. 503
Birmingham, for himself and his friends. Six packed them- 1787
selves within, and eight arranged themselves without, and off Age 84
tliey all set at midnight ; but even the presence of fourteen
Methodist preachers was not an insurance against accident. No
doubt, many a hymn was sung as they whisked away through
beautiful Cheshire scenery, the stars shining approvingly, and
the fields all round wrapped in solemn silence ; but, a little
before three in the morning, when approaching Conglcton, the
coach broke down beneath its unwonted burden, and had to
be abandoned for another. In about an hour, number two
was crippled like number one ; while one of the horses was
so knocked up as to be scarcely able to go at all This
Methodist monopoly of the Birmingham stage coach issued,
not in a moonlight pleasure trip, but in a series of disasters
which men so pious and so good had not expected. The
distance was not great ; but nineteen hours were spent in
getting over it. The party arrived at Birmingham at 7 p.m. ;
Wesley found a congregation waiting ; he stepped out of the
coach into the chapel, and began preaching without delay.
" And such," says he, " was the goodness of God, that I found
no more weariness when I had done than if I had rested all
the day."
This was marvellous, in the case of an old man, above
eighty ; but, notwithstanding this, he was off again, before
five o'clock next morning ; travelled nearly eleven hours; and,
at night, preached in the new chapel at Gloucester. But even
this was not all. The morning after, he set out again at two
o'clock, travelled till half-past four in the afternoon, and
preached at Salisbury in the evening. Next morning at four,
he took chaise to Southampton, where, on August 9 and 10,
he preached thrice.
Here the Methodists worshipped in an auction room ; and
then in a loft, used by a bricklayer in stowing away his
scaffolding, and which acquired imperishable fame as the
spiritual birthplace of Elizabeth Wallbridge, the "Dairyman's
Daughter."^
Wesley, accompanied by Dr. Coke and Joseph Bradford,
was now on his way to the Channel islands ; where Methodism
' Smith's History of Methodism.
504 Life and Times of Wesley.
1787 had been introduced as early as the year 1783, by certain
K^%a, Methodist soldiers, who wrote to England for a preacher.
Robert Carr Brackenbury, a gentleman of fortune, rented a
house in the town of St. Heliers, Jersey; and he and his
attendant, Alexander Kilham, preached throughout the island,
amid violent persecution, but with great success.^ At the
conference of 1786, Adam Clarke was sent ; and now there
were, in the three islands of Jersey, Guernsey, and Alderney,
Methodist societies containing three hundred members.
On Saturday, August 11, Wesley and his friends started
from Southampton for Guernsey, but, before the day was
ended, had to put into Yarmouth harbour, in the Isle of
Wight, where they were detained till Monday, but improved
their detention by preaching four times in the market house.
On Monday the storm had abated, and they again set out ;
but, in the afternoon, were glad to seek shelter at Swanage,
where Wesley found a small society, and preached in the
presbyterian chapel. Again they went on board, and
hoped to reach Guernsey on Tuesday afternoon ; but the
storm obliged them to steer for the isle of Alderney, in
the bay of which they narrowly escaped being dashed to
pieces. Having slept in a five bedded room, and preached
upon the beach, they again set sail for Guernsey, where they
at last arrived, and were warmly welcomed by Mr. De Jersey.
Here five days were spent, during which Wesley preached
seven sermons, and dined at the governor's.
On Monday, August 20, they landed in Jersey, where they
were detained by storms and hurricanes till the 28th. During
the eight days, Wesley preached a dozen sermons, Mr.
Brackenbury acting as his interpreter.
On the 28th, he returned to Guernsey, where, by stress of
weather, he was obliged to stay till September 6, but still
employed himself as actively as ever. He then sailed for
Penzance, in Cornwall, and arrived in safety.
Wesley's labours in the Channel islands were greatly
blessed ; but his voyages were adventurous, and, more than
once, extremely dangerous. They were also rich in religious
incidents. On one occasion, two of the sailors, who were
^ Drew's Life of Coke.
Wesley on the Waves. 505
aloft, swore most dreadfully ; and, greatly to the surprise of 1787
his companions, Wesley seemed not to notice them. At Age 84
length, the sailors still swearing, Wesley looked up to them,
and said : " Swear louder, and then perhaps God Almighty
will hear you." The ironical reproof stopped the blasphemy.^
Another incident is worth relating. Wesley writes in his
journal : " September 6 — We went on board with a fair,
moderate wind ; but we had just entered the ship when the
wind died away. We cried to God for help ; and it presently
sprung up, exactly fair, and did not cease till it brought us
into Penzance bay." This is all ; but Adam Clarke, who was
present, gives further details. Wesley was reading in the
cabin ; but, hearing the noise and bustle occasioned by
putting about the vessel, to stand on her different tacks,
he looked out of the cabin door, and asked what was matter.
Being told, he quietly remarked, " Then let us go to prayer."
Coke, Bradford, and Clarke having prayed, Wesley began :
" Almighty and everlasting God, Thou hast svvay everywhere,
and all things serve the purposes of Thy will : Thou boldest
the winds in Thy hands, and sittest upon the waterfloods,
and reignest a King for ever : command these winds and these
waves that they obey Thcc; and take us speedily and safely
to the haven whither we would be ! " The power of his peti-
tion was felt by all : he rose from his knees, made no remark,
and resumed his reading. Clarke went on deck, and, to his
surprise, found the vessel standing her right course, with a
steady breeze, which brought them safe to Cornwall.^
Wesley was more than satisfied with his trip to these lovely
islands. " Here," says he, " is an open door : high and low,
rich and poor, receive the word gladly ; so that I could not
regret being detained by contrary winds several days longer
than we intended." ^
Wesley's landing in Cornwall was unexpected, but not
unwelcome. Rewrites: "We appeared to our friends here
as men risen from the dead. Great was their rejoicing over
us ; and great was the power of God in the midst of the con-
^ Reynolds's " Anecdotes of Wesley," p. 25.
- Life of Clarke, vol. i., p. 259.
^ Wesley's Works, vol. xiii., p. So.
5o6 Life and Times of Wesley.
1787 gregation." On Saturday, September 8, he preached twice,
Age 84 out of doors, to large congregations ; and, the day following,
thrice, besides meeting a society in a chapel " exactly round,
and composed wdiolly of brazen slags, which," says Wesley^
" I suppose will last as long as the earth."
On September 14, he got to Bristol, where he spent the
next three weeks. First of all, " with the assistance of two
of his friends, he had to answer abiuidance of letters',' the
accumulation of the last five weeks. Then, he had to visit
the " country societies " round about, and, among others, that
at Castle Carey, where the mob had thrown the first preacher,
that visited the place, into a horse pond. On October 8, he
returned to London, where he employed the next {&\^ days
" in answering letters, and preparing matter for the maga-
zine." One or two of the letters, belonging to this period,
may be inserted here.
The first was addressed to William Black, in Nova Scotia,
who was considerably troubled with a recent importation from
Scotland, in the form of a presbyterian minister, who was
more a Socinian than a Calvinist.
" Near Bath, September 26, 1787.
"My dear Brother, — You have great reason to praise God for the
great things that He hath done, and to expect still greater things than
these. Your grand difficulty, now, will be to guard your flock against
that accomplished seducer. When you mentioned a person came from
Scotland, I took it for granted that he was a Calvinist. But I find it is
not so well ; for I take a Socinian to be far worse than even a predesti-
narian. Nevertheless, I advise you and all our preachers, never oppose
him openly. Doing thus would only give the unawakened world an
advantage against you all. I advise you farther, never speak severely,
much less contemptuously, of him in any mixed company. You must use
no weapons in opposing him, but only those of truth and love. Your
wisdom is: (i) Strongly to inculcate the doctrines which he denies; but
without taking any notice of him, or seeming to know that any one does
deny them. (2) To advise all our brethren (but not in public) never to
hear him, at the peril of their souls. And (3) narrowly to inquire whether
any one is staggered, and to set such an one right as soon as possible.
Thus, by the blessing of God, even those that are lame will not be turned
out of the way. Peace be with your spirit !
" I am, dear Billy, your affectionate friend and brother,
"John Wesley.'"
' Black's Memoirs, p. 200.
yonatkan Crow t her. 507 '
The next has not before been published. Jonathan 1787
Crowther and Duncan McAlkim had been appointed to AgeS^
succeed Edward Burbeck and Joshua Keighley, in Scotland.
On arriving', they found the former " dying of fever in a
lousy bed" ; and the latter already dead and buried. Their
journey had been adventurous and dangerous ; their circuit
(Inverness) was large ; and their allowances next to nothing ;
for Crowther received only fifty shillings for the whole year's
labour ; and forty of these he spent in removing to Dunbar.
He wrote to Wesley : " No man is fit for Inverness circuit,
unless his flesh be brass, his bones iron, and his heart harder
than a stoic's." After giving an account of the death of
Burbeck and Keighley, he adds : " I too shall probably be
sacrificed in this miserable corner ; and, if I were doing good,
I should be content (if I had them) to sacrifice seven lives
every year ; but to live in misery, and to die in banishment,
for next to nothing, is afflicting indeed." ^
Poor Crowther was downhearted, and no wonder. Wesley's
reply was characteristic.
" Near Bath, September 25, 1787.
"Dear Jonathan, — The sum of the matter is, you want money; and
money you shall have, if I can beg, borrow, or anything but steal. I say,
therefore, ' Dwell in the land, and be doing good, and, verily, thou shalt
be fed.' I should be sorry for the death of Mr. Burbeck, but that I know
God does all things well ; and, if His work prospers in your hands, this
will make your labours light. Our preachers now find, in the north of
Scotland, what they formerly found all over England ; yet they went on ;
and when I had only blackberries to eat in Cornwall, still God gave me
strength sufficient for my work, I am, etc.,
"John Wesley."
"P.S.— To Mr. Atlay:
Pay to Jonathan Crowther, or his order, Five Guineas.
"John Wesley." *
The next two letters refer to a case of discipline in the
Channel islands, in which Wesley displayed greater liberality
than some of his itinerants. The first was written to Robert
Carr Brackenbury, the second to Adam Clarke.
"London, C>(r/tf^^?r 20, 1787.
" Dear Sir, — Mr. is undoubtedly a good young man ; and has a
tolerably good understanding. But he thinks it better than it is ; and, in
^ Crowther's manuscript autobiography. ^ iijij_
5oS Life and Times of Wesley.
1787 consequence, is apt to put himself in your or my place. For these fifty
Age 84
years, if any one said, ' If you do not put such an one out of society, I
will go out of it'; I have said, ' Pray go ; 1, not you, are to judge who
shall stay.' I, therefore, greatly approve of your purpose, to give Mr.
W a full hearing in the presence of all the preachers. I have often
repented of judging too severely ; but very seldom of being too merciful.
As the point is undoubtedly of very great importance, it deserved serious
consideration ; and I am. glad you took the pains to consider it, and
discussed it so admirably well, according to Scripture and sound reason.
" I ever am, dear sir, your affectionate friend and brother,
" John Wesley." ^
" London, December 8, 1787.
"... Brother de Quetevillc and you do not mind what I say. I do
not wonder at him, (he does not know me,) but I do at you. His natural
temper is stern ; yours is not. Therefore, I expect yon to regard me,
whether he does or no. We have no such custom among our societies,
nor ever had, as for a man to acknowledge his fault before a whole society.
There shall be no such custom while I live. If he acknowledge it before
the preachers it is enough.
"John Wesley." 2
In the month of May of the present year, there was insti-
tuted, in London, a society for the suppression of the slave
trade, of which the chief members were Granville Sharp,
William Dillwyn, Thomas Clarkson, and William Wilberforce.
In this, as in other great beneficent movements, Wesley was
one of the pioneers. Thirteen years previously, he had
published his "Thoughts upon Slavery"; and, at the com-
mencement of the present year, had inserted a long letter, on
the same subject, in his Arininiaii Magazine. The formation
of an antislavery society was to him a joy ; and he, at once,
wrote to the committee, expressing his satisfaction. He
desired to warn them, that they must expect great difficulties
and great opposition ; for those interested in the system of
slavery were a powerful body, and would employ hireling
writers, who would have neither justice nor mercy. As for
himself, he would do all he could to promote the object of
their institution. He would reprint a new and large edition
of his " Thoughts on Slavery," and circulate it among his
friends in England and Ireland, to whom he would add a
' Wesley's Works, vol. xiii., p. 6.
^ Wesley an Times, Sept. 28, 1868.
Antislavery Society. 509
few words in favour of their design. He then concluded 1787
in these words : " I commend you to Him, who is able to ^^^84
carry you through all opposition, and support you under all
discouragements."
On the 30th of October, 1787, he sent a second letter, which
was read to the society, and in which he said, that he had
now read the publications which the committee had sent him,
and that he took, if possible, a still deeper interest in their
cause. He exhorted them to more than ordinary diligence
and perseverance ; to be prepared for opposition ; to be
cautious about the manner of procuring information and
evidence, that no stain might fall upon their character ; and
to take care that the question should be argued as well upon
the consideration of interest as of humanity and justice, the
former of which he feared would have more weight than the
latter.i
Wesley fulfilled his promise to render help. Hence the
following to Mr. Thomas Funnell, Lewes, Sussex.
" November 2\, 1787.
"My dear Brother, — Whatever assistance I can give those generous
men, who join to oppose that execrable trade, I certainly shall give. I
have printed a large edition of the ' Thoughts on Slavery,' and dispersed
them to every part of England. But there will be vehement opposition
made, both by slave merchants and slave holders ; and they are mighty
men : but our comfort is. He that dvvelleth on high is mightier.
" I am, your affectionate brother,
"John Wesley." 2
Thus began a struggle, which lasted six-and-forty years,
and terminated in the Emancipation Act, which took effect en
August I, 1834. Wesley died four years after the fight
commenced ; Wilberforce just as the victory was being won,
for he expired while the resolutions, preparatory to the bill,
were being passed in the House of Commons.
The last three months of the year 1787 were spent in
London, and in the usual journeys through the surrounding
counties. On October 15, he began what he calls his " little
tour through Oxfordshire," and preached twice a day, besides
travelling. At this time, Joseph Entwisle and Richard Reece
' Clarkson's "Abolition of the Slave Trade," vol. i., p. 447.
^ Mctliodist Magazine, 1S27, p. 391.
5IO Life and Times of Wesley.
1787 were in the " Oxfordshire " circuit. The former, a young man
A.<^4 of twenty, while riding with Wesley, had the misfortune to have
a horse whose pace was swifter than its steps were sure. The
nag fell with suddenness, the young preacher made a summer-
sault over the head of the prostrate animal, and alighted on
his feet unhurt, "Well done!" cried Wesley, delighted with
the agility of his youthful friend, and, no doubt, remembering
many of his own marvellous escapes, — " Well done, Joseph !
I could not have done better than that myself"^
Richard Recce also used to relate an anecdote respecting
Wesley's visit to this, his first circuit, in 1787. Wesley was
accompanied by Thomas Rankin, and the two came to Oxford,
where Wesley had to preach in the chapel in New Inn Hall
Lane. The front gallery Avas filled with gownsmen, who,
whatever other accomplishments they had acquired, still lacked
the politeness of gentlemen, for, as soon as Wesley began to
read his text, the beardless boys, in gowns and college caps,
began to cheer. Up jumped Rankin, his Scotch blood boil-
ing, and, with stentorian voice, cried : " In the name of God,
gentlemen, what can ye mean, to interrupt and insult a servant
of the Lord, about to preach salvation .-'" Wesley, more used
to such behaviour than his impetuous friend, calmly said,
"Sit down. Tommy, sit down"; and then quietly proceeded
with his discourse.^
In his excursion through Kent, Wesley preached both
morning and evening, every day. In Hertfordshire, he met
Simeon from Cambridge.
" Sir," said young Simeon, " Sir, I understand you are called
an Arminian ; now I am sometimes called a Calvinist, and
therefore, I suppose, we are to draw daggers. But, before I
begin to combat, with your permission, I will ask you a few
questions, not from impertinent curiosity, but for real instruc-
tion. Pray sir, do you feel yourself a depraved creature, so
depraved that you would never have thought of turning to
God, if God had not put it into your heart .''"
" Yes," said the veteran, " I do indeed."
" And do you utterly despair of recommending yourself to
' Entwisle's Memoir, p. 36.
^ Wesley an Times ^ June 19, 1849.
Simeon catechizing Wesley. 5 1 1
God by anything that you can do; and look for salvation 1787
solely through the blood and righteousness of Christ ?" h^Z^,
" Yes, solely through Christ."
" But, sir, supposing you were Jirst saved by Christ, are you
not somehow or other to save yourself afterwards, by your
good works ? "
" No ; I must be saved by Christ, from first to last."
"Allowing, then, that you were first turned by the grace of
God, are you not in some way or other to keep yourself by
your own power ? "
" No."
" What, then ? are you to be upheld every hour and every
moment by God, as much as an infant in its mother's arms .-' "
" Yes, altogether."
" And is all your hope in the grace and mercy of God, to
preserve you unto His heavenly kingdom ?"
"Yes, I have no hope but in Him."
" Then, sir, with your leave, I will put up my dagger again :
for this is all my Calvinism ; this is my election, my justifica-
tion, my final perseverance. It is in substance all that I hold,
and as I hold it ; and, therefore, if you please, instead of
searching out terms and phrases to be a ground of contention
between us, we will cordially unite in those things wherein we
agree. '■
Such was the catechetical examination instituted by a
young parson of twenty-eight, and submitted to by an old
man of eighty-four.
In November, Wesley took another step, which virtually
involved a separation from the Church of England. Seventeen
years before, in warning his preachers against such a separa-
tion, he had not only directed them and the people to attend
the services and sacraments of the Church, but to guard against
calling preachers " ministers," and their places of worship
" meeting-houses." " Do not," said he, " license them as such :
the proper form of a petition to the judge or justice is, 'A. B.
desires to have his house in C — licensed for public worship."
He continued : " Do not license yourself till you are con-
strained ; and then not as a Dissenter, but a Methodist. It is
1 «
Wesley the Worthy," by Dr. Dobbin, p. 91.
512 Life and Times of Wesley.
17S7 time enough when you are prosecuted, to take the oaths.
Age 84 And by so doing you are Hcensed." ^
Hitherto, Wesley had been opposed to hcensing, except
in cases of necessity, simply on the ground that this savoured
of separation from the Established Church. Now he writes :
" 1787, November 3 — I had a long conversation with Mr. Ckilow," [his
legal adviser,] " on that execrable act called the Conventicle Act. After
consulting the Act of Toleration, with that of the fourteenth of Queen
Anne, we were both clearly convinced, that it was the safest way to license
all our chapels, and all our travelling preachers, not as Dissenters, but
simply 'preachers of the gospel'; and that no justice, or bench of
justices, has any authority to refuse licensing either the house or the
preachers."
The " execrable Conventicle Act " was levelled against
Dissenters from the Church of England ; the Act of Toleration
was passed for the relief of such Dissenters ; and Wesley, by
availing himself of the provisions of that act, ipso facto,
conceded the point that the Methodists were Dissenters.
He still, however, persisted in asserting that the Methodists
were members of the Church of England ; and this involved
both him and them in further difficulties. In some instances,
the magistrates remarked : " You profess yourselves to be
members of the Church of England ; therefore, your licences
are worthless ; nor can you, as members of the Church,
receive any benefit from the Act of Toleration." This was a
subtle distinction ; and Wesley saw that the Methodists must
either profess themselves Dissenters, or be subjected to an
indefinite amount of trouble. He was unwilling to alter their
relation to the Established Church ; and yet he wished them
to be saved from this embarrassment. Hence the following,
addressed to a member of parliament.^
" Dear Sir, — Last month, a few poor people met together in Somerset-
shire, to pray, and to praise God, in a friend's house ; there was no preach-
ing at all. Two neighbouring justices fined the man of the house ;^2o.
I suppose, he was not worth twenty shillings. Upon this, his household
goods were distrained, and sold to pay the fine. He appealed to the
' Large Minutes, 1770.
^ Henry Moore says this letter was written in the autumn of 1790; and
that, when the lawyer, at the head of the persecution, boasted that he
•would drive Methodism out of Somersetshire, Wesley quietly remarked,
" Yes, when he can drive God out of it." — (Life of Wesley, vol. ii., p. 383.)
Separation from the Chu7xh. 513
quarter sessions ; but all the justices averred, ' The Methodists could have i 787
no relief from the Act of Toleration, because they went to church ; and that, — "_
so long as they did so, the Conventicle Act should be executed upon them. ^^
" Last Sunday, when one of our preachers was beginning to speak to a
quiet congregation, a neighbouring justice sent a constable to seize him,
though he was licensed ; and would not release him till he had paid £,20,
telling him his licence was good for nothing, ' because he was a Church-
man.'
" Now, sir, what can the Methodists do .? They are liable to be ruined
by the Conventicle Act, and they have no relief from the Act of Tolera-
tion ! If this is not oppression, what is ? Where then is English liberty ?
the liberty of Christians, yea, of every rational creature ? who, as such,
has a right to worship God according to his own conscience. But, waiving
the question of right and wrong, what prudence is there in oppressing
such a body of loyal subjects.? If these good magistrates could drive them,
not only out of Somersetshire, but out of England, who would be gainers
thereby ? Not his majesty, whom we honour and love ; not his ministers,
whom we love and serve for his sake. Do they wish to throw away so
many thousand friends, who are now bound to them by stronger ties
than that of interest ? If you will speak a word to Mr. Pitt on that head,
you will oblige yours, etc. " John Wesley."
About the same time, Wesley wrote as follows to a bishop.^
" My Lord, — I am a dying man, having already one foot in the grave.
Humanly speaking, I cannot long creep upon the earth, being now nearer
ninety than eighty years of age. But I cannot die in peace, before I have
discharged this office of Christian love to your lordship. I write without
ceremony, as neither hoping nor fearing anything from your lordship, or
any man living. And I ask, in the name and presence of Him, to whom
both you and I are shortly to give an account, why do you trouble those
that are quiet in the land ; those that fear God and work righteousness .''
Does your lordship know what the Methodists are ? That many thousands
of them are zealous members of the Church of England ; and strongly
attached, not only to his majesty, but to his present ministry? Why
should your lordship, setting religion out of the question, throw away such
a body of respectable friends ? Is it for their religious sentiments? Alas,
my lord, is this a time to persecute any man for conscience sake? I
beseech you, my lord, do as you would be done to. You are a man of
sense; you are a man of learning ; nay, I verily believe, (what is of infi-
nitely more value,) you are a man of piety. Then think, and let thinlc I
pray God to bless you with the choicest of His blessings.
" I am, my lord, etc.,
"John Wesley." 2
1 This letter is without date. Henry Moore says it was written about
1790. (Wesley's Life, vol. ii., p. 383.)
2 Atmore's " History of Persecution," p. 420.
VOL. III. L L
514 Life and Times of Wesley.
1787 Is it surprising, that the Methodists wished to separate from
Age84 the Church of England, and that Wesley was led, in fact
driven, to take the dissenting steps he did ? And yet, to the
very last, we find him still adhering to the church of his early
choice. Already the Methodists had begun to have service in
church hours ; but this was far from having his warm approval.
Only two days after his consultation with Mr. Clulow, he went
to Dorking, where he wrote :
" The congregation was, as usual, large and serious. But there is no
increase in the society. So that we have profited nothing by having our
service in the church hours, which some imagined would have done
wonders. I do not know that it has done more good anywhere in
England; in Scotland I believe it has."
If possible, Wesley was more popular than ever. He
writes :
" November 4 — The congregation at the new chapel " [City Road] " was
far larger than usual ; and the number of communicants was so great,
that I was obliged to consecrate thrice.'" " November 9 — A friend offering
to bear my expenses, I set out to Nottingham, where I preached a charity
sermon for the infirmary, which was the design of my coming. This is
not a county infirmary, but is open to all England ; yea, to all the world ;
and everything about it is so neat, so convenient, and so well ordered,
that I have seen none like it in the three kingdoms." ^ " November 25 —
I preached two charity sermons at West Street, in behalf of our poor
children." "December 16 — After preaching at Spitalfields, I hastened to
St. John's, Clerkenwell, and preached a charity sermon for the Finsbury
dispensary; as I would gladly countenance every institution of the
kind."
All this was extra work ; for Wesley's chief employment,
at the end of every year, was preaching to the London
Methodists, and meeting the London classes. Strange to
say, the latter was to Wesley an irksome task. Hence he
writes :
"1787, November 19 — I began the tinpleasing work of visiting the
classes. I still continue to do this in London and Bristol, as well as in
Cork and Dubhn. With the other societies, their respective assistants
supply my lack of service."
There were also other things, far from pleasant, requiring
^ The infirmary was built in 1781, on land partly given by the Duke of
Newcastle, and partly by the corporation. During the first thirty years
of its existence, it afforded assistance to 33,926 persons.
Wesley s Publications, in 1787. 515
his attention. A Laodicean spirit had crept in among the 1787
London Methodists, and, in strong terms, he had to warn Age 84
them of their sin and danger. They were also ;^300 in debt,
and he found it necessary to devise means to make the
income equal to the expenditure. His preachers also, and his
household, vexed him. He writes :
"1787, Sunday, December 9 — I went down at half-hour past five, but
found no preacher in the chapel, though we had three or four in the
house; so I preached myself. Afterwards, inquiring why none of my
family attended the morning preaching, they said it was because they sat
up too late. I resolved to put a stop to this ; and, therefore, ordered, that
(i) every one under, my roof should go to bed at nine; that (2) every
one might attend the morning preaching ; and so they have done ever
since."
Amid all this labour and annoyance, it is amusing to find
this venerable man, in the eighty-fifth year of his age, visiting
what then answered to the Madame Tussaud's exhibition of
1871, and evincing a curiosity and a keenness of observation
not often equalled by the visitors of the present time. Hence
the following.
"December 10 — I was desired to see the celebrated waxwork at the
museum in Spring Gardens. It exhibits most of the crowned heads in
Europe, and shows their characters in their countenance. Sense and
majesty appear in the king of Spain ; dulness and sottishness in the king
of France ; infernal subtlety in the late king of Prussia ; (as well as in
the skeleton Voltaire ;) calmness and humanity in the emperor, and king of
Portugal; exquisite stupidity in the prince of Orange; and amazing
coarseness, with everything that is unamiable, in czarina.
With the exception of contributing to the Arniinian
Magazine, Wesley's literary life was ended. He revised
former publications, as, for instance, his Notes on the New
Testament; and he occasionally published an extract from
some other author; but all the original productions of his mind
and pen were now published in the magazine. During this
present year, he committed to the press a new pocket hymn-
book, 24mo, 240 pages ; but the work was compiled, not W7'itten,
and was intended as a substitute for the volume issued in 1785.
He also published "Conjectures concerning the Nature of
Future Happiness. Translated from the French of Monsieur
Bonnet, of Geneva:" i2mo, 12 pages, — a remarkable tract, little
5i6 Life arid Times of Wesley.
^787 known, but full of thought.i The following is Wesley's address
Age 84 "To the Reader." "Dublin, April 7, 1787. I am happy in
communicating to men of sense in this kingdom, and at a
very low price, one of the most sensible tracts I ever read. —
John Wesley."
The magazine, as usual, contains six original sermons by
Wesley, several of them among the most able and interesting
that he ever wrote. That on Temptation is m.arked by great
discrimination and beauty. The one on Dress fearlessly
denounces what was then, and still is, a fearfully prevailing
evil. Having laid down the principles, that " slovenliness is
no part of religion " ; and that " there may undoubtedly be a
moderate difference of apparel, between persons of different
stations " ; he proceeds to show, that the natural effects of
"adorning ourselves with gold, or pearls, or costly array,"
are pride, vanity, anger, and lust ; and concludes with one -of
his most withering addresses to the Methodists then living,
and which the Methodists of the present day would do well to
ponder.
" Have not many of you grown finer as fast as you have grown richer?
As you increased in substance, have you not increased in dress ? Witness
the profusion of ribbons, gauze, or Hnen about your heads ! What have you
profited then by bearing the reproach of Christ 'i by being called Method-
ists ? Are you not as fashionably dressed as others of your rank that are no
Methodists ? Do you ask, ' But may we not as well buy fashionable things
as unfashionable V I answer. Not if they give you a bold, immodest look,
as those huge hats, bonnets, headdresses do. And not, if they cost more.
* But I can afford \X.' Oh, lay aside for ever that idle nonsensical word !
No Christian can afford to waste any part of the substance which God
has entrusted him with. How can it be, that, after so many warnings,
you persist in the same folly? Is it not hence? There are among you
some that neither profit themselves by all they hear, nor are willing that
others should ; and these, if any of you are almost persuaded to dress as
Christians, reason, and rally, and laugh you out of it. O ye pretty trifiers,
I entreat you not to do the devil's work any longer. Whatever ye do
yourselves, do not harden the hearts of others. And you, that are of a
better mind, avoid these tempters with all possible care. You answer,
universal custom is against me. Not only the profane, but the religious
^ Its republication would enrich the pages of the Methodist Magazine
of the present day. One conjecture is, that, after the resurrection, "our
eyes may unite in themselves the qualities of microscopes and telescopes,
and accommodate themselves exactly to all distances."
Wesley on the Dress of Methodists. 5 1 7
world, run violently the other way. Look into, I do not say the theatres, 1787 '
but the churches, nay, and the meetings of every denomination (except —
a few old fashioned quakers, or the people called Moravians) ; look into the ^^
congregations, in London or elsewhere, of those that are styled gospel minis-
ters ; look into Northampton chapel, yea, into the Tabernacle, or the chapel
in Tottenham Court Road ; nay, look into the chapel in West Street, or that
in the City Road ; look at the very people that sit under the pulpit, or by
the side of it, — and are not those that can afford it (I can hardly refrain from
doing them the honour of naming their names) as richly, as fashionably
adorned, as those of the same rank in other places ? This is a melancholy
truth. I am ashamed of it ; but I know not how to help it. I call heaven
and earth to witness this day, that it is not my fault. The trumpet has
not given an uncertain sound, for near fifty years last past. O God !
Thou knowest I have borne a clear and faithful testimony. In print, in
preaching, in meeting the society, I have not shunned to declare the whole
counsel of God. I am, therefore, clear of the blood of those that will not
hear. It lies upon their own heads. And, yet, I warn you once more, in
the name, and in the presence of God, that the number of those that
rebel against God is no excuse for their rebellion. He hath expressly
told us, Thou shalt not follow the niultitjide to do evil. I conjure you, all
who have any regard for me, show me, before I go hence, that I have not
laboured, even in this respect, in vain, for near half a century. Let me
see, before I die, a Methodist congregation full as plainly dressed as a
quaker congregation. Only be more consistent with yourselves. Let
your dress be cheap as well as plain ; otherwise, you do but trifle with
God and me, and your own souls, I pray, let there be no costly silks
among you, how grave soever they may be. Let there be no quaker linen,
proverbially so called, for their exquisite fineness ; no Brussels lace ;
no elephantine hats or bonnets, those scandals of female modesty. Be
all of a piece, dressed, from head to foot, as persons professing godliness j
professing to do everything small and great, with the single view of
pleasing God."
Wesley's sermon on the Lord's Supper was written in 1732,
and has been already noticed. To the sentiments then
avowed, he still adhered.
That on the More Excellent Way is characteristic of him-
self ; and re-enforces his views on early rising, on the manner
of transacting business, on food, conversation, amusements,
and money. One or two extracts may be given.
" Diversions are of various kinds. Some are almost peculiar to men,
as the sports of the field, — hunting, shooting, fishing. Others are in-
differently used by persons of both sexes, — as races, masquerades, plays,
assembhes, balls, cards, dancing and music ; to which may be added, the
reading of plays, novels, romances, newspapers, and fashionable poetry.
Some diversions, which were formerly in great request, are now fallen into
5i8 Life and Times of Wesley.
1787 disrepute. The nobility and gentry, (in England at least,) seem totally to
— - disregard the once fashionable diversion of hawking ; and the vulgar
*» ^ themselves are no longer diverted by men hacking and hewing each
other in pieces at broad sword. The noble game of quarter staff, like-
wise, is now exercised by very few. Yea, cudgelling has lost its humour,
even in Wales itself. Bear baiting is now very seldom seen, and bull
baiting not very often. And it seems cock fighting would totally cease in
England, were it not for two or three right honourable patrons. It is not
needful to say anything more of these foul ' remains of Gothic barbarity/
than that they are a reproach, not only to all religion, but even to human
nature. One would not pass so severe a censure on the sports of the
field. Let those, who have nothing better to do, still run foxes and hares
out of breath. Neither need much be said about horse races, till some
man of sense will undertake to defend them. It seems a great deal more
may be said in defence of seeing a serious tragedy. I could not do it
with a clear conscience, at least, not in an English theatre, the sink of all
profaneness and debauchery ; but possibly others can. I cannot say
quite so much for balls, or assemblies ; which are more reputable than
masquerades, but must be allowed, by all impartial persons, to have
exactly the same tendency. So undoubtedly have all public dancings.
Of playing at cards, I say the same as seeing of plays. I could not do it
with a clear conscience. But I am not obliged to pass any sentence on
those that are otherwise minded. I leave them to their own Master; to
Him let them stand or fall.
" But supposing these, as well as the reading of plays, novels, news-
papers, and the like, to be quite iiinoccjit diversions, yet are there not
more excellent ways of diverting themselves, for those that love or fear
God ? Would men of fortune divert themselves in the open air ? They
may do it, by cultivating and improving their lands, by planting their
grounds, by laying out, carrying on, and perfecting their gardens and
orchards. At other times, they may visit and converse with the most
serious and sensible of their neighbours ; or they may visit the sick, the
poor, the widows, and fatherless in their afflictions. Do they desire
to divert themselves in the house ? They may read useful history, pious
and elegant poetry, or several branches of natural philosophy. If you
have time, you may divert yourselves by music, and perhaps by philo-
sophical experiments. But, above all, when you have once learned the
use of prayer, you will find, that this will fill every space of hfe, be inter-
fused with all your employments, and, wherever you are, whatever you do,
embrace you on every side. Then you will be able to say boldly :
'With me no melancholy void.
No moment lingers unemployed,
Or unimproved below ;
My weariness of life is gone,
Who live to serve my God alone,
And only Jesus know.'"
Wesley on Worldly Wealth. 519
On the subject of money, Wesley's " More Excellent Way," 17^7
to the worldly minded, is equally startling, but one which Age 84
he himself, for fifty years, invariably adopted.
" If you have a family, seriously consider, before God, how much each
member of it wants, in order to have what is needful for life and godli-
ness. And, in general, do not allow them less, nor much more than you
allow yourself. This being done, fix your purpose, to gain no more. I
charge you, in the name of God, do not increase your substance ! As it
comes daily or yearly, so let it go : otherwise you lay up treasures upon
ea}-th; and this our Lord as flatly forbids, as murder and adultery. By
doing it, therefore, you would treasure up to yourselves wrath against the
day of Tvrath, and revelation of the righteous judgment of God. But
suppose it were not forbidden, how can you, on principles of reason, spend
your money in a way, which God may possibly fo7give, instead of spend-
ing it in a manner which He will certainly reward? You will have no
reward in heaven, for what you lay tip: you will, for what you lay out.
Every pound you put into the earthly bank is sunk ; it brings no interest
above. But every pound you give to the poor is put into the bank of
heaven; and it will bring glorious interest; yea, and such as will be
accumulating to all eternity."
This was plain speaking; but who will undertake to gain-
say it ?
The sermon on Christian Courtesy is full of the wisdom
of an aged, and widely experienced, saint ; while that on
Former Times Better than These is equally remarkable,
and well worth reading.
The Anniniaji Magazine for 1787 is enriched, as usual,
with letters, poetry, biography, apparition anecdotes, and
choice extracts from other writers ; but, besides these, there are
a few other productions from Wesley's pen, as his able article
" On Allegorical Writings in general, and especially the
Parables of our Lord"; and his weighty "Thoughts upon
Methodism." We can only afford space for an extract from
the latter. He writes :
" I am not afraid, that the people called Methodists should ever cease
to exist either in Europe or America. But I am afraid, lest they should
only exist as a dead sect, having the form of religion without the power.
And this undoubtedly will be the case, unless they hold fast both the
doctrine, spirit, and discipline with which they first set out."
After describing the rise of Methodism, he proceeds :
" From this short sketch of Methodism, any man of understanding
may easily discern, that it is only plain, scriptural religion, guarded by a
520 Life and Times of Wesley.
1787 few prudential regulations. The essence of it is holiness of heart and
l~~c, life ; the circumstantials all point to this. And as long as they are
joined together in the people called Methodists, no weapon formed
against them shall prosper. But, if even the circumstantial parts are
despised, the essential will soon be lost. And if ever the essential parts
should evaporate, what remains will be dung and dross.
" It nearly concerns us to see how the case stands with us at present.
I fear, wherever riches have increased (exceeding few are the exceptions)
the essence of religion, the mind that was in Christ, has decreased in the
same proportion. Therefore, I do not see how it is possible, in the nature
of things, for any revival of true religion to continue long. For religion
must necessarily produce both industry and frugality ; and these cannot
but produce riches. But as riches increase, so will pride, anger, and love
of the world in all its branches.
"How then is it possible that Methodism, that is, the religion of the
heart, though it flourishes now as a green bay tree, should continue in
this state ? For the Methodists in every place grow diligent and frugal ;
consequently, they increase in goods. Hence, they proportionably in-
crease in pride, in the desire of the flesh, the desire of the eyes, and the
pride of life. So, although the form of religion remains, the spirit is
swiftly vanishing away.
" Is there no way to prevent this ? this continual declension of pure
religion ? We ought not to forbid people to be diligent and frugal ; we
must exhort all Christians, to gain all they can, and to save all they can :
that is, in effect, to grow rich ! What way then, I ask again, can wc take,
that our money may not sink us to the nethermost hell? There is one
way, and there is no other under heaven. If those who gain all they can,
and save all they can, will likewise give all they can, then the more they
gain, the more they will grow in grace, and the more treasure they will
lay up in heaven."
Wesley knew not how to flatter. However painful to him-
self or to others, when he deemed it needful, he never tried
to conceal his thoughts. The above was not likely to win
him the applause of prosperous and rich Methodists ; but
that to him was a matter of indifference. His great anxiety
was to perpetuate Methodism, — not merely Methodists.
1788.
WESLEY had published, in the ten volumes of his 1788
Arminian Magazine already issued, forty-two original aT~s
sermons by himself; and he now ascertained, that a
clergyman, in the west of PIngland, intended to reprint
them in a separate form. Wesley had been frequently
solicited to do this himself; but had as often answered, "I
leave this for my executors." Now, to prevent piracy, he
determined to be his own republisher ; and issued these
invaluable discourses, with a few others, in four volumes,
i2mo; to which he prefixed a preface, from which the
following characteristic extract is taken.
" Is there need to apologise to sensible persons for the plainness of my
style ? A gentleman, whom I much love and respect, lately informed
me, with much tenderness and courtesy, that men of candour made great
allowance for the decay of my faculties ; and did not expect me to write
now, either with regard to sentiment or language, as I did thirty or forty
years ago. Perhaps they are decayed ; though I am not conscious of it.
But is not this a fit occasion to explain myself concerning the style
which I use from choice, not necessity? I could even now write as
floridly and rhetorically as even the admired Dr. B ; but I dare not ;
because I seek the honour that cometh from God only. What is the
praise of man to me, that have one foot in the grave, and am stepping
into the land whence I shall not return ? Therefore, I dare no more
write in a fine style than wear a fine coat. But were it otherwise, had I
time to spare, I should still write just as I do. I should purposely
decline, what many admire, a highly ornamental style. I cannot admire
French oratory; I despise it from my heart. Let those that please be in
raptures at the pretty, elegant sentences of Massillon or ]3ourdaloue ; but
give me the plain nervous style of Dr. South, Dr. Bates, or Mr. John
Howe ; and, for elegance, show me any French writer who exceeds Dean
Young, or Mr. Seed. Let who will admire the French frippery, I am still
for plain sound English.
" I think a preacher or writer of sermons has lost his way, when he
imitates any of the French orators ; even the most famous of them ; even
Massillon or Bourdaloue. Only let his language be plain, proper, and
clear; and it is enough. God Himself has told us how to speak, both
as to the matter and manner: ' If any man speak' in the name of God,
'let him speak as the oracles of God'; and if he would imitate any part
0
522 Life a?td Times of Wesley.
1 788 of these above the rest, let it be the First Epistle of St. John. This is the
.■ "o style, the most excellent style, for every gospel preacher. And let him
aim at no more ornament than he finds in that sentence, which is the
sum of the whole gospel, 'We love Him, because He first loved us.'"
Wesley's journal for the first two months of 1788 is
lost ; but existing letters show, that the time was spent
in London. The following have not hitherto been published ;
and, though brief, refer to two subjects of the highest
interest, — Sunday-schools and cottage prayer-meetings.
The first was addressed to Duncan Wright, who was now
at Bolton ; the second to William Simpson, at Stockton
upon Tees.
" London, January 9, 1788.
" Dear Duncan, — You send me a comfortable account of the work
of God in your circuit. I cannot doubt but a blessing redounds to you
all for the sake of the poor children. I verily think, these Sunday-
schools are one of the noblest specimens of charity, which have been set
on foot in England since the time of William the Conqueror.
" If Michael Fenwick has a mind to go to Dumfries and assist Robert
Dall, you may give him three guineas, which he must husband well. He
may write to me from thence.
" I am, dear Duncan, your affectionate friend and brother,
"John Wesley."
"London, January 18, 1788.
" Dear Billy, — You did exceeding well to enlarge the number of
praver-meetings, and to fix them in serious courts. I do not know
that any means of grace whatever has been more owned of God
than this.
"It is not now, but at the time of conference, that children are
received into Kingswood school.
" I am glad sister Moor has not forgotten me. I hope sister Middleton
also thinks of me sometimes. You are Avelcome to the four volumes
of sermons.
" I am, dear Billy, your affectionate friend and brother,
"John Wesley."
Charles Wesley was now dying. Long, loving, and
faithful had been the friendship between the two brothers.
Their opinions had often differed ; but their affection had
never failed. Their most serious difference had been on
the subject of separation from the Church of England,
ordinations, and the administration of the sacraments ; but,
even on these matters, Charles, while writing strongly, never
Death of Charles Wesley. 523
wrote unbrotherly. His last letter, in our possession, on 1788
these disputed topics, is as follows. Age 85
" April % 1787.
" Dear Brother, — I served West Street chapel on Friday and
Sunday. Next Saturday, I propose to sleep in your bed. Stand to
your own proposal: 'Let us agree to differ.' I leave America and
Scotland to your latest thoughts and recognitions ; only observing now,
that you are exactly right. Keep your authority while you live; and,
after your death, detur digniori, or rather, digiiioribiis. You cannot
settle the succession : you cannot divine how God will settle it. Have
the people of given you leave to die, E. A. P. J. ? ^
" I am, etc.,
"C. Wesley."*
It would almost seem from this, that Charles was disposed
to abandon his objections to the ordinations for America
and Scotland ; but, be that as it may, we have here some of
his last thoughts respecting the Methodists. He evidently
believed that, after his brother's death, they would exist
as a separated people, and he wished them to be governed
by those of themselves who were worthiest.
Wesley loved his brother, and on February 18, 1788,
addressed to him the following laconic note.
" Dear Brother, — You must go out every day, or die. Do not die
to save charges. You certainly need not want anything as long as I
live. "John Wesley." 3
Ten days after this, Wesley left London, for his long
northern journey, saying : " If I see it again, well ; if not, I
pray God to raise up others, that Avill be more faithful and
more successful in His work ! I find, by an increase of years,
(i) Less activity ; I walk slower, particularly up hill : (2) My
memory is not so quick : (3) I cannot read so well by candle-
light. But, I bless God, that all my other powers of body and
mind remain just what they were."
A month later, Wesley's brother had entered into rest.
They had parted, not to meet again till they met in heaven.
1 Four letters, standing for Ecclesice Anglicance Presbyter Johannes:
"John, presbyter of the Church of England." Wesley, in early life„ some-
times used this signature in writing to his brother.
2 Moore's Life of Wesley, vol. ii., p. 359.
3 Jackson's Life of C, Wesley, vol. ii., p. 437.
5^4 Life and Times of Wesley.
1788 Wesley, however, thought that his brother might recover.
Age 85 Hence the following, written on March 2.
" Dear Brother, — Many inquire after you, and express much affec-
tion, and desire of seeing you. In good time ! You are first suffering
the will of God. Afterwards, He has a httle more for you to do : that is,
provided you now take up your cross, (for that it frequently must be,)
and go out, at least, an hour in a day, I would not blame you, if it were
two or three. Never mind expense. I can make that up. You shall
not die to save charges. Peace be with all your spirits !
"John Wesley.""
Three days later he wrote again.
" March t„ 1788.
"Dear Brother, — I hope you keep to your rule, of going out every
day, although it may sometimes be a cross. Keep to this but one month,
and I am persuaded you will be as well as you were at this time twelve-
month. Adieu !
"John Wesley." 2
Here, with one exception, epistolary correspondence
between the two brothers ceased. Charles was too feeble
to continue it, and his daughter became his substitute. In
reply to one of her letters, Wesley wrote as follows.
"Bristol, Alcurh 7, 1788.
" My dear Sally, — When my appetite was entirely gone, so that all
I could take at dinner was a roasted turnip, it was restored in a few days,
by riding out daily, after taking ten drops of elixir of vitriol in a glass
of water. It is highly probable, this would have the same effect in my
brother's case. But, in the mean time, I wish he would see Dr. White-
head. I am persuaded there is not such another physician in England ;
although, to confound human wisdom, he does not know how to cure his
own wife.
"He must lie in bed as Httle as possible in the daytime; otherwise it
•will hinder his sleeping at night.
" Now, Sally, tell your brothers from me, that their tenderly respectful
behaviour to their father, (even to asking his pardon, if in anything they
have offended him,) will be the best cordial for him under heaven. I
know not but they may save his life thereby. To know nothing will be
•wanting, on your part, gives great satisfaction to, my dear Sally,
" Yours very affectionately,
"John Wesley." ^
^ Jackson's Life of C. Wesley, vol. ii., p. 438.
2 Ibid. p. 438. 2 Ibid. p. 439.
Death of Chai'les Wesley. 525
To Samuel Bradburn, now stationed in London, Wesley 1788
addressed the following hitherto unpublished letter. A^85
" Bristol, March 13, 1788.
"Dear Sammy,— With regard to my brother, I advise you: (i)
Whether he will or no, (at least, if not done already,) carry Ur. Whitehead
to him. (2) If he cannot go out, and yet must have exercise or die, persuade
him to use twice or thrice a day, and procure one for him. (3) I
earnestly advise him to be electrified ; not shocked, but only filled with
electric fire. (4) Inquire if he has made his will, though I think it
scarcely possible he should have delayed it.
" The tunes, which brother Rhodes left with you, should be immediately
printed in the cheap form. Kind love to Sophy.
" I am, dear Sammy, your affectionate friend and brother,
"J. W^ESLEY."
Four days later, Wesley wrote his last letter to his brother,
" Bristol, il/^z;-67/ 17, 17S8.
"Dear Brother, — I am just setting out on my northern journey, but
must snatch time to write two or three lines. I stand and admire the
wise and gracious dispensations of Divine providence ! Never was there
before so loud a call to all that are under your roof. If they have not
hitherto sufficiently regarded either you, or the God of their fathers, what
is more calculated to convince them, than to see you so long hovering upon
the borders of the grave? And, I verily believe, if they receive the
admonition, God will raise you up again. I know you have the sentence
of death in yourself: so had I more than twelve years ago. I know
nature is utterly exhausted : but is not nature subject to His word.? I do
not depend upon physicians, but upon Him that raiseth the dead. Only
let your whole family stir themselves up, and be instant in prayer; then I
have only to say to each, 'If thou canst believe, thou shalt see the glory
of God!' Be strong in the Lord, and in the power of His might.
Adieu !
"John Wesley."^
It ■'
Another letter must be inserted, written three days after
the above, to his niece, Miss Wesley.
" Worcester, March 20, 1 788.
"My dear Sally,— Mr. Whitefield had, for a considerable time,
thrown up all the food he took. I advised him to slit a large onion across
the grain, and bind it warm on the pit of his stomach. He vomited no
more. Pray apply this to my brother's stomach, the next time he
eats.
" One in Yorkshire, who was dying for want of food, as she threw up
all she took, was saved by the following means : Boil crusts of white
' Jackson's Life of C. Wesley, vol. ii., p. 440.
526 Life and Times of Wesley.
1788 bread to the consistence of a jelly ; add a few drops of lemon juice, and
. o^ a little loaf sugar; take a spoonful once or twice an hour. By all means,
let him try this.
" If neither of these avail, (which I think will not bathe case,) remem-
ber the lady at Paris, who lived several weeks without swallowing a grain,
by applying thin slices of beef to the stomach.
"But, above all, let prayer be made continually; and, probably, he
will be stronger after this illness than he has been these ten years. Is
anything too hard for God? On Sunday I am to be at Birmingham; on
Sunday sennight, at Madeley. My dear Sally, adieu !
"John Wesley."'
Nine days after this, on March 29, Charles Wesley died.
It is a curious incident, that Wesley, at the time, was preach-
ing in Shropshire, and (as was afterwards ascertained) he and
his congregation, at the very moment of his brother's exit,
were smging
" Come let us join our friends above,
That have obtained the prize.
And, on the eagle wings of love,
To joys celestial rise :
Let all the saints terrestrial sing,
With those to glory gone ;
For all the servants of our King,
In earth and heaven, are one.
One family we dwell in Him,
One church, above, beneath.
Though now divided by the stream,
The narrow stream, of death :
One army of the living God,
To His command we bow ;
Part of His host have crossed the flood,
And part are crossing no2u." ^
Samuel Bradburn, the assistant in the City Road circuit,
immediately dispatched a letter to Wesley, informing him of
his brother's death; but, in consequence of its being mis-
directed, it failed to reach him till April 4, the day before the
burial. Wesley was at Macclesfield, and to get to London
in time for the funeral was impossible. Hence the following
letter to the bereaved widow.
' Jackson's Life of C. Wesley, vol. ii., p. 441.
* " The Aliens of Shiney Row," p. 59.
Age 85
Death of Charles Wesley. 527
" Macclesfield, April 4, 1 788. 1788
" Dear Sister, — Half an hour ago, I received a letter from Mr. Brad-
burn, informing me of my brother's death. For eleven or twelve days
before, I had not one line concerning him. The last I had was from
Charles, which I delayed to answer, expecting every day to receive some
further information. We have only now to learn that great lesson, ' The
Lord gave, and the Lord hath taken away ; blessed be the name of the
Lord!' If it had been necessary, in order to serve either him or you,
I should not have thought much of coming up to London. Indeed, to
serve you, or your dear family, in anything that is in my power, will
always be a pleasure to, dear sister, your affectionate friend and brother,
" John Wesley." ^
Wesley had no disposition to tell the deep sorrows of his
heart ; but that he severely felt the departure of his brother,
there can be no question. A fortnight afterwards, when at
Bolton, he attempted to give out, as his second hymn, the
one beginning with the words, " Come, O Thou Traveller
unknown "; but when he came to the lines, —
" My company before is gone,
And I am left alone with Thee," —
the bereaved old man sunk beneath emotion which was
uncontrollable, burst into a flood of tears, sat down in the
pulpit, and hid his face with his hands. The crowded
congregation well knew the cause of his speechless excite-
ment; singing ceased; and the chapel became a Bochim.
At length, Wesley recovered himself, rose again, and went
through a ser\ace which was never forgotten by those who
were present at it.^
Wesley intended to write his brother's life, and began to
collect materials for it ; but his other engagements were too
numerous to admit of the fulfilment of his purpose. The
following is the obituary published in the conference minutes.
" Mr. Charles Wesley, who, after spending fourscore years with
much sorrow and pain, quietly retired into Abraham's bosom. He had no
disease ; but, after a gradual decay of some months,
' The weary wheels of life stood still at last.'
His least praise was his talent for poetry; although Dr. Watts did not
scruple to say, that that single poem, 'Wrestling Jacob,' was worth all
the verses he himself had written."
^ Jackson's Life of C. Wesley, vol. ii., p. 442.
- Methodist Recorder, Dec. 5, 1861.
528 Life a7id Times of Wesley.
1788 This is not the place, nor indeed have we room for it, to
Age 85 write a critique on the hfe and character of this remarkable
man. It would be easy to give the opinions of those who
knew him, — Whitehead, Moore, Coke, Bradburn, Clarke, and
Pawson, — some in favour, and others to the contrary. Suffice
it to say, that, had he done nothing more than furnish the
Methodists, and the church of Christ generally, with his incom-
parable hymns, in which so many millions have devoutly wor-
shipped the God. of heaven, he would have rendered service to
the cause of truth and piety which no language can adequately
describe. His " hymns, and psalms, and spiritual songs," for a
hundred and thirty years, have been the metrical liturgy of
the people called Methodists, and to them countless multitudes
have been indebted for not a few of their richest blessings.
True to his high church principles, Charles Wesley, instead
of selecting the burial ground of his brother's chapel in
City Road, desired to be interred in the consecrated church-
yard of St. Marylebone. This, to Wesley, was a painful
disappointment. " It is a pity," said, he, in a letter to the
Rev. Peard Dickenson, " but the remains of my brother had
been deposited with mine. Certainly that ground is holy as
any in England ; and it contains a large quantity of ' bonny
dead.' " ^ So deeply did he feel this, that, seven weeks after
his brother's funeral, he wrote an article, at Dumfries, on the
consecration of churches and burial grounds, which he pub-
lished in his magazine ; and in which, after showing, that
there is no law of England, or of the English Church,
enjoining such a practice, he remarks :
" Neither is it enjoined by the law of God. Where do we find one
word, in the New Testament, enjoining any such thing ? Neither do I
remember any precedent of it in the purest ages of the church. It seems
to have entered, and gradually spread itself, with the other innovations
and superstitions of the Church of Rome. For this reason, I never
wished that any bishop should consecrate any chapel or burial ground of
mine. Indeed, I should not dare to suffer it ; as I am clearly persuaded
the thing is wrong in itself, being not authorised either by any law of
God, or by any law of the land. In consequence of which, I conceive,
that either the clerk or the sexton may as well consecrate the church, or
the churchyard, as the bishop. With regard to the latter, I know not
* Jackson's Life of C. Wesley, vol. ii., p. 445.
Consecrating Burial Grounds. 529
who could answer that plain question: You say, * This is consecrated 1788
ground, so many feet broad, and so many long^ ; but pray how deep is it ? ^ g^
'Deep! what does that signify?' Oh, a great deal! for if my grave be
dug too deep, I may happen to get out of the consecrated ground ! And
who can tell, what unhappy consequences may follow from this ! I take
the whole of this practice to be a mere relic of Romish superstition. And
I wonder, that any sensible protestant should think it right to counte-
nance it ; much more that any reasonable man should plead for the
necessity of it ! Surely it is high time now, that we should be guided, not
by custom, but by Scripture and reason." *
This was a heavy blow at his brother's prejudice. Wesley
himself resolved to be buried in the ground connected with
the chapel in the City Road, and he wished his brother to be
buried with him. To this Charles objected, because the
ground had not been consecrated by a bishop ! The objection
was foolish ; and the burial, in another place, occasioned
considerable gossip. John Pawson, in a letter dated April 28,
1788, remarks : " Charles Wesley would not be buried at the
new chapel, because it was not consecrated ; nor by any of
our ministers, but by one of his own choosing. He sent for
the parson of the parish where' he lived, and said : ' Sir,
whatever the world may have thought of me, I have lived,
and I die, in the communion of the Church of England, and I
will be buried in the yard of my parish church.' " ^ Wesley
well knew that remarks like these were current ; and he owed
it to his people to publish his thoughts on a subject, which,
however insignificant in itself, was not unlikely to be a
gossiping gangrene in his societies.
Wesley's affection for his brother was evinced in the
continued kindness exercised towards his brother's family.
According to his own account book, he gave to them, in this
the year of their bereavement, at least, two hundred guineas.
He also assured his brother's widow that, as long as he lived,
he would help her to the utmost of his power. The two
following letters may fitly draw the curtain on Charles
Wesley's death and burial.
"7///)/ 25, 1788.
"My dear Sister,— You know well what a regard I had for Miss
Gwynne, before she was Mrs. Wesley. And it has not ceased from that
'^ Methodist Magazine, 1788, p. 543.
2 Manuscript letter.
VOL. III. M M
Age 85
530 Life mid Times of Wesley.
1788 time till now. I am persuaded it never will. Therefore, I will speak
without reserve just what comes into my mind. I have sometimes
thought you are a little lilce me. My wife used to tell me, ' My dear, you
are too generous. You don't know the value of money.' I could not
wholly deny the charge. Possibly, you may sometimes lean to the same
extreme. I know you are of a generous spirit. You have an open heart,
and an open hand. But may it not sometimes be too open, more so than
your circumstances will allow ? Is it not an instance of Christian, as well
as worldly, prudence, to cut our coat according to our cloth ? If your
circumstances are a little narrower, should you not contract your expenses
too ? I need but just give you this hint, which I doubt not you will take
kindly from, my dear Sally,
" Your affectionate friend and brother,
"John Wesley."'
" December 21, 1788.
"My dear Sister, — It is undoubtedly true, that some silly people,
(whether in the society or not I cannot tell,) have frequently talked in that
manner, both of my brother and me. They have said, that we were well
paid for our labours. And, indeed, so we were, but not by man. Yet,
this is no more than we were to expect, especially from busybodies in
other men's matters. And it is no more possible to restrain their tongues,
than it is to bind up the wind. But it is sufficient for us, that our own
conscience condemned us not ; and that our record is with the Most
High.
" What has concerned me more than this idle slander is a trial of
another kind. I supposed, when John Atlay left me, that he had left me
one or two hundred pounds beforehand. On the contrary, I am one
or two hundred pounds behindhand, and shall not recover myself till after
Christmas. Some of the first moneys I receive, I shall set apart for you;
and in everything that is in my power, you may depend upon the willing
assistance of,
" Dear Sally, your affectionate friend and brother,
"John Wesley." 2
We must now return to Wesley's journal. On the last day
in February, he left London, for Bath and Bristol. The mayor
of Bristol invited him to preach in the civic church, which
invitation he accepted. His worship and most of the alder-
men were present ; and Wesley, fearing no man's frown, and
courting no man's favour, took for his text the fearful narra-
tive of the rich man and Lazarus ; and then dined, with the
rich men, at the rich man's table, in the mansion house. The
most remarkable incident, however, occurred in his own
* Jackson's Life of C. W^esley, vol. ii., p. 449. 2 jbi^^
Remarkable Incident at Bristol. 531
chapel on Thursday evening, the 6th of ]\Tarch. At that 1788
time, one of the great questions of the day was the subject Age 85
of slavery ; and Wesley had announced his intention to
preach on it. The chapel, in consequence, was densely
crowded, with both rich and poor. Wesley selected as his
text, " God shall enlarge Japheth : and he shall dwell in the
tents of Shem : and Canaan shall be his servant." The rest
we give in the words of Wesley himself. He writes :
"About the middle of the discourse, while there was on every side
attention still as night, a vehement noise arose, none could tell why, and
shot like lightning through the congregation. The terror and confusion
were inexpressible. You might have imagined it was a city taken by
storm. The people rushed upon each other with the utmost violence ;
the benches were broken in pieces ; and nine tenths of the congregation
appeared to be struck with the same panic. In about six minutes, the
storm ceased, almost as suddenly as it rose ; and, all being calm, I went
on without the least interruption. It was the strangest incident of the
kind I ever remember ; and, I believe, none can account for it, without
supposing some praeternatural influence. Satan fought, lest his kingdom
should be delivered up. We set the next day apart as a day of fasting
and prayer, that God would remember those poor outcasts of men," [the
slaves,] " and make a way for them to escape, and break their chains
asunder."
The sceptic will sneer at Wesley's solution ; but, before he
does so, he ought himself to supply a better. Opinions
respecting this mysterious commotion will be different ; but
all parties will unite in admiring Wesley's sympathy with the
suffering slave. Wesley was the first Englishman who
appointed a fast day to pray that slavery might cease.
On the 17th of March, Wesley set out on his journey to
the north. Everywhere he had enormous congregations ; and
frequently was obliged, in wintry weather, to preach in the
open air. Mrs. Fletcher, at Madeley, wrote : " I could not
but discern a great change in him. His soul seems far more
sunk into God, and such an unction attends his word, that
each sermon was indeed spirit and life." ^
Exactly eight weeks were occupied in reaching the Scottish
border ; and, during this interval, Wesley preached more than
eighty sermons, in fifty-seven different towns and villages.
In seven instances, all in Yorkshire, he preached in churches.
^ Mrs. Fletcher's Life, p. 251.
532 Life and Times of Wesley.
The crowds were greater than ever ; and, almost in every-
place he visited, he found the work of God progressing.
On the 13th of May, Wesley visited Dumfries, where he
had stationed Robert Dall, at the conference of 1787.
Dumfries was without a chapel, and without a society ; but
Mr. Dall had just the sort of energy which such a place
required ; and Wesley knew it. The following letters to his
home missionary have not before been published.
" London, December i, 1787.
" Dear Robert, — You have reason to praise God, who has prospered
you, and given you to see the fruit of your labours. Our all dispensing
God has called us to preach the plain gospel. I am glad your hands are
strengthened in corresponding with the brethren. I will desire any to
change with you when you see it best, and, if I live till spring, please
God, I will visit you at Dumfries.
" I am, with love to sister Dall, your affectionate friend and brother,
" John Wesley."
"London, February 11, 1788.
"Dear Robert, — I allow you to build at Dumfries, providing any one
will lend a hundred guineas on interest.
" I hope to see you, God willing, in May.
" I am, etc.,
" John Wesley."
Robert Dall was one of Wesley's favourites, and so was his
Christian wife, to whom, said Wesley, in another unpublished
letter now before us, " God has given both sense and grace."
This godly couple set all their energies to work ; and, by
begging of their friends in all parts of the United Kingdom,
succeeded, in three months, in building the unique chapel
which Wesley describes below. The effort was regarded as
gigantic ; and Wesley's visit was a sort of triumphant top
stone to the whole affair. " Such,'^ writes Mrs. Gordon
Playdell to Mr. Dall, "such was the general prejudice
against Mr. Wesley, that I really feared his coming would
end your hopeful prosperity ; but God has disappointed all
my fears, and outdone all my hopes. The popularity, which
met him here, was marvellous. The turn in his favour was
such as none but God could have brought about. You have
been all along respected, and the esteem for you grows more
and more. Your pious, unwearied attentions to the poor
criminals have increased the general regard for you, and your
Chapel at DiLmfries. 533
sermons in the jail been much approved."^ " Mr. Wesley," 1788
wrote Charles Atmore, " was much pleased with Dumfries Age~8s
and you. He has given you a place in his journal, and what
you have done at Dumfries will be a memorial of you to all
generations."
We could quote a large number of other letters relative to
the same subject ; but the above is a sufficient preface to the
following racy extract from Wesley's journal.
" May 13 — To-day, we went through lovely roads to Dumfries.
Robert Dall soon found me out. He has behaved exceeding well, and
done much good here : but he is a bold man ; he has begun building a
preaching house, larger than any in Scotland, except those in Glasgow
and Edinburgh! In the evening, I preached abroad in a convenient
street, on one side of the town. Rich and poor attended from every
quarter, of whatever denomination ; and every one seemed to hear for
life. Surely the Scots are the best hearers in Europe ! At five, next
morning, I was importuned to preach in the preaching house; but such
an one I never saw before. It had no windows at all: so that, although
the sun shone bright, we could see nothing without candles."
Wesley's next halting place was Glasgow. It had been
widely reported, by some of the Scottish ministers, that he
was about to publish a new edition of the Bible, and to leave
out part of the Epistle to the Romans, St. John's Apocalypse,
and other portions of the inspired writings ; ^ but, notwith-
standing this, says Charles Atmore, in the letter before
quoted, " he was far better received in Glasgow than ever."
Here he spent three days ; preached six sermons ; gave an
account concerning the rise and progress of Methodism ; and
ordained John Barber.^
Speaking of the Glasgow chapel, Wesley writes : " It will
contain about as many as the chapel at Bath. But oh the
difference ! It has the pulpit on one side ; and has exactly
the look of a presbyterian meeting-house. It is the very
sister of our house at Brentford. Perhaps an omen of what
will be when I am gone."
In his address on Methodism, which was delivered to the
congregation, he remarked :
" There is no other religious society under heaven, which requires
^ Manuscript letter. ^ j_ Pavvson's manuscript letter.
3 Methodist Magazine, 1845, p. 1 1 1.
534 / Life and Times of Wesley.
nothing of men in order to their admission into it, but a desire to save
their souls. Look all around you, you cannot be admitted into the church,
or society of the presbyterians, anabaptists, quakers, or any others, unless
you hold the same opinions with them, and adhere to the same mode of
worship. The Methodists alone do not insist on your holding this or
that opinion ; but they think and let think Neither do they impose any
particular mode of worship ; but you may continue to worship in your
former manner, be it what it may. Now, I do not know any other reli-
gious society, either ancient or modern, wherein such liberty of conscience
is now allowed, or has been allowed, since the age of the apostles. Here
is our glorying ; and a glorying peculiar to us. What society shares it
with us V
From Glasgow, Wesley went to Edinburgh, where he
wrote : " I still find a frankness and openness in the people
of Edinburgh, which I find in few other parts of the kingdom.
I spent two days among them with much satisfaction ; and I
was not at all disappomted, in finding no such increase,
either in the congregation or the society, as many expected
from their leaving the kirk."
Wesley here recognises the Edinburgh Methodists as
a separated people, in other words, a cJuircJi ; but adroitly inti-
mates, that the result was not equal to what many of his friends
had ventured to expect. How stands the case.'' In 1766,
when the numbers were first given, Edinburgh circuit had 165
members of society, who, in the next four years, dwindled to
62. Then the circuit rallied, and, in four years more, the
numbers rose to 287. In the next quadrennial period, we
find them reduced to 161. In 1785, when the ordinations
for Scotland took place, Edinburgh had 134 Methodists ; now,
in 1788, it had 330 ; which, however, at Wesley's death in
1791, were reduced to 205. These are curious statistics; and
help to cast light on Wesley's meaning.
On May 25, Wesley reached Newcastle, which, for the next
fortnight, was the centre of his labours. Two incidents, in
connection with this visit, are worth recording.
Three years before, John Hampson, jun., greatly offended,
had relinquished the itinerancy, and was now a clergyman
at Sunderland. Strangely enough, Hampson invited
Wesley to occupy his pulpit, and Wesley willingly accepted
the invitation. The church was crowded both morning and
afternoon.
A Northern Fanatic. 535
The other incident occurred at Stanhope, famed " for no- 1 7S8
thing but a very uncommon degree of wickedness." The Age 85
preaching place was an upper room, and the congregation
large. Presently, the main beam, that supported the room,
gave way, and a frightful hubbub followed. " One man,"
says Wesley, " leaped out of the window ; the rest quietly
went out ; and nothing was hurt except a poor dog beneath
the window. I then preached in the open air, to twice or
thrice as many as the room would have contained, who were
all attention." This, which might have been a serious cata-
strophe, happened at five o'clock on a summer's morning.
On the 9th of June, Wesley left Newcastle for the south.
Reaching Darlington, he writes :
" Margaret Barlow came to me ; and I asked her abundance of questions.
I was soon convinced, that she was not only sincere, but deep in grace ;
and, therefore, incapable of deceit. I was convinced likewise, that she
had frequent intercourse with a spirit that appeared to her in the form of
an angel. I know not how to judge of the rest. Her account was : —
* For above a year, I have seen this angel, whose face is exceeding
beautiful : her raiment white as snow, and glistering like silver ; her voice
unspeakably soft and musical. She tells me many things before they
come to pass. She foretold I should be ill at such a time, in such a
manner, and well at such an hour ; and it was so exactly. She has said,
such a person shall die at such a time ; and he did so. Abov^ two
months ago, she told me your brother was dead ; (I did not know you had
a brother ;) and that he was in heaven. And some time since, she told
me. you will die in less than a year. But what she has most earnestly
and frequently told me, is, that God will, in a short time, be avenged on
obstinate sinners, and will destroy them with fire from heaven.'"
Wesley adds :
" Whether this will be so or no, I cannot tell ; but when we were alone
there was a wonderful power in her words ; and, as the Indian said to
David Brainerd, ' They did good to my heart.' It is above a year since
this girl was visited in this manner, being then between fourteen and
fifteen years old. But she was then quite a womanish girl, and of un-
blamable behaviour. Suppose that which appeared to her was really an
angel ; yet from the face, the voice, and the apparel, she might easily
mistake him for a female ; and this mistake is of little consequence.
Much good has already resulted from this odd event ; and is likely to
ensue ; provided those who believe, and those who disbelieve, her report,
have but patience with each other."
Marvellous ! Who was Margaret Barlow } The answer
involves an episode in Methodistic history.
53^ Life arid Times of Wesley.
17S8 In the conference minutes for 1778, John Blades is reported
Age 85 as one of Wesley's itinerant preachers on trial ; but, beyond
this, he is never mentioned. Blades was a native of North-
umberland, a weakminded fanatic, totally unfit for the
itinerant work. Perhaps, for this reason, he was not appointed
to a circuit. For some years, however, he acted, in the
capacity of a local preacher, in the north of England. He
then began to preach consummate nonsense respecting the
privileges of believers, and, with such success that, when he
left the Methodists in 1784, he was enabled to form separate
societies in a large number of places in the county of Durham,
and in the north of Yorkshire. Among his followers, who
were called Bladonians} was Ralph Hodgson, a miller at West
Auckland, in whose house Margaret Barlow was a servant.
We have before us a long unpublished letter, written by this
dusty enthusiast, only a fortnight before Wesley's interview
with his servant girl at Darlington. It is addressed to " Mr.
Richard Steel, Tanner, Wolsingham. With all possible
speed": and is dated. May 27, 1788. Hodgson tells his
friend Steel that an angel from the Lord had appeared to
him, and stated that the "wicked were about to be destroyed
from off the face of the earth." He also urges Steel to join
with him in making this angelic revelation as widely known
as possible.
It is a curious fact that Hodgson waited upon Wesley at
Newcastle, for the purpose of converting him to his opinions ;
and that he accompanied his clairvoyant servant, Margaret
Barlow, to meet Wesley at the house of Thomas Pickering, at
Darlington. He also wrote a long letter, dated " West Auck-
land, October 26, 1788," to the Rev. Mr. Agutter, St. Mary
Magdalen college, Oxford, in which he informed that gentle-
man that Margaret Barlow had been his servant about two
years ; that she had attended the services of the Methodists ;
that an angel had appeared to her in the form of a female,
and with a lustre brighter than the light of a thousand
candles ; that the angel had come to her in the daytime as
well as night ; and had made known to her the state of many
who were dead, as well as many who were still alive ; but that
^ Methodist MagazUie, 1797, p. 553.
Wesley's Credulity. 537
the principal matter, which the angel had revealed, was the 1788
exact day when the wicked would be destroyed. Margaret AgeSj
also had been much disturbed by the appearance of two evil
spirits, both clad in black, and wearing horns ; but the
recital of her visions had produced effects great and blessed.
What was the result of all this religious raving ? Margaret,
at length, announced the exact day when the destruction of
the wicked was to be accomplished. Intense excitement fol-
lowed. Some sold their clothing and property, and distributed
the proceeds among the poor ; and others exulted at the
thought of the possessions of the wicked being distributed
among themselves. The day came, numbers having sat up all
night to watch its dawning. Portentous signs appeared. The
heavens gathered blackness, lightnings flashed, and thunders
roared. At Barnardcastle it was the day of the weekly
market. The people were frantic, some with hope, and some
with fear. Cries were heard, " It is coming ! It is coming ! "
The business of the market was suspended ; and consterna-
tion was general. At length, the clouds were scattered, the
heavens brightened, the day passed over, and all things con-
tinued as they were. The bubble burst ; Blades, Hodgson,
his wife, and Margaret Barlow were discredited, and fled
across the Atlantic ; where most, if not all of them, joined
the shakers, whose principles and morals, to say the least,
were capable of great improvement.
The reader will excuse this lengthened digression concern-
ing a mad miller and his servant maid. We have purposely
omitted the numerous stories, of a similar description, which
Wesley has inserted in his journal and magazine ; but one
instance seemed necessary, to illustrate what was unquestion-
ably a feature in Wesley's character, — excessive credulity in
receiving doubtful proofs of the existence and nearness of an
unseen world of spirits. We are not inclined to say hard things
concerning this. It was a weakness, but not a sin. Besides,
though some of the stories, referred to, were ridiculously
foolish, it would be rashness to deny that some of the others
were strictly and startlingly true. And further, we honestly
declare that, in an age like this, when the general tendency
is to scepticism rather than to credulity, we should hail, as
no bad omen, the appearance of a disposition, like that of
538 Life and Twies of Wesley.
1788 Wesley, to cherish, not denounce, any and every evidence
Age85 ^f another and future state of being.
On leaving Darlington, Wesley proceeded to Whitby,
where he was advertised to open a new chapel ; but, as often
happens now, when the day arrived, the building was far from
being ready. For want of stairs, the people had to be admit-
ted to the gallery through one of the back windows near the
pulpit ; and, for want of a gallery front, a number of stalwart
Yorkshiremen squatted themselves all round the gallery
ledge, their backs protecting the people behind them, and
their feet dangling over the heads of those below.' Wesley
writes :
"June 13, Friday. — At eight, I preached to a lovely congregation at
Stokesley; and, at eleven, in Guisborough, to one far larger. In the
evening, I preached at Whitby, in the new house, thoroughly filled above
and below. The unfinished galleries, having as yet no fronts, were fright-
ful to look upon. It is the most curious house we have in England. You
go up to it by about forty steps ; and have then before you a lofty front,
I judge, near fifty feet high, and fifty-four feet broad."
Wesley spent the next two days in Whitby, preaching
twice on Saturday, and thrice on Sunday, and finishing up
with a Yorkshire lovefeast.
From the "plain people at Whitby" Wesley went to the
Scarborough elegants ; and thence to Bridlington, Malton,
Beverley, and Hull. In the last mentioned town, Joseph
Benson and the Methodists had recently erected George Yard
chapel, an edifice of which Benson was immensely proud, and
whose account of its opening services, six months before,
drew from Wesley the following laconic letter.
" Dear Joseph, — I greatly rejoice in the erection of your new preach-
ing house; and in the tokens of the Divine presence with which you and
the people were favoured at the opening; but if it be at all equal to the
new chapel in London, I will engage to eat it.
" I am, yours affectionately,
"John Wesley."^
Wesley's new chapel in City Road was his beau ideal, and
great was his jealousy of all pretentious competitors ; but
^ Memoir of Mrs. Knaggs.
2 Methodist Magazine, 1836, p. 492.
An early Breakfast. 539
still he was obliged to acknowledge, that even George Yard 1788
chapel, Hull, was " well built, and elegantly finished ; hand- AgeSs
some, but not gaudy."
During his stay in Hull, he preached twice in the high
church, by the invitation of the vicar, Mr. Clark ; and thrice
in Benson's pet chapel.
Notwithstanding his three heavy services on the previous
day, Wesley, an old man, in the eighty-fifth year of his age,
set out on June 23, and not only travelled all the way from
Hull to York, but, preached four sermons in four different
towns and villages.
At York a happy reconciliation was brought about.
Wesley had been greatly annoyed with Robert Spence for
publishing the "York Hymn Book"; and Robert had
been so grieved by Wesley's strictures as to be strongly
tempted to leave the Methodists. Wesley and the grand
old Methodist at York, however, were not the men to harbour
malice ; and, by appointment, the oft*ending bookseller
breakfasted with Wesley, at three d clock in the morning,
and all past diff'erences were consigned to the shades of
charitable oblivion.'
A three o'clock breakfast ! And yet, this, with Wesley,
was not at all unusual. His energy, diligence, and punctuality
were marvellous. Addressing his coachman, at this early
breakfast in the city of York, he said, " Have the carriage
at the door at four. I do not mean a quarter or five minutes
past, but four." The man knew what his master meant ; and,
as the minster clock struck four, Wesley had shaken hands
wdth Robert Spence, and was entering his chaise.^ Railways,
since then, have helped to make some men punctual ; but
Wesley was perfect in this human excellence long before
railway engines began to whistle.
Wesley made his way to Epworth, where he spent his
birthday. He writes :
"June 28. — I this day enter on my eighty-fifth year ^ : and what cause
have I to praise God, as for a thousand spiritual blessings, so, for bodily
blessings also ! How little have I suffered yet by ' the rush of numerous
' Memoirs of Spence, p. 26. - Ibid.
^ It ought to have been eighty-sixth.
540 Life and Tmies of Wesley.
1788 years!' It is true, I am not so agile as I was in times past. I do not
. o run or walk so fast as I did ; my sight is a little decayed ; my left eye is
grown dim, and hardly serves me to read ; I have daily some pain in the
ball of my right eye, as also in my right temple, (occasioned by a blow
received some months since,) and in my right shoulder and arm, which I
impute partly to a sprain, and partly to the rheumatism. I find, likewise,
some decay in my memory, with regard to names and things lately past ;
but not at all with regard to what I have read or heard twenty, forty, or
sixty years ago ; neither do I find any decay in my hearing, smell, taste,
or appetite ; (though I want but a third part of the food I did once ;) nor
do I feel any such thing as wearihess, either in travelling or preaching ;
and I am not conscious of any decay in writing sermons; which I do as
readily, and I believe, as correctly, as ever.
"To what cause can I impute this, that I am as I am? First, doubtless,
to the power of God, fitting me for the work to which I am called, as
long as He pleases to continue me therein; and, next, subordinately to
this, to the prayers of His children.
" May we not impute it, as inferior means, (1) To my constant exercise
and change of air 1 (2) To my never having lost a night's sleep, sick
or well, at land or at sea, since I was born ? (3) To my having
sleep at command ; so that, whenever I feel myself almost worn out, I
call it, and it comes, day or night? (4) To my having constantly, for
above sixty years, risen at four in the morning ? (5) To my constant
preaching at five in the morning, for above fifty years ? (6) To
my having had so little pain in my life; and so little sorrow, or anxious
care ?
" Even now, though I find pain daily in my eye, or temple, or arm; yet
it is never violent, and seldom lasts many minutes at a time. Whether
or not this is sent to give me warning, that I am shortly to quit this
tabernacle, I do not know ; but be it one way or the other, I have only to
say,
' My remnant of days
I spend to His praise,
Who died the whole w^orld to redeem ;
Be they many or few.
My days are His due.
And they all are devoted to Him.'"
Wesley's two texts on this memorable birthday were
appropriate. Here, eighty-five years before, he had been
born, in the Epworth parsonage ; and now, in the morning, he
preached from, " So teach us to number our days, that we
may apply our hearts unto wisdom " ; and, in the evening,
from, " Beware, therefore, lest that come upon you, which
is spoken of in the prophets ; behold, ye despisers, and
wonder, and perish ; for I work a work in your days, a work
Demoniacs. 541
which ye shall in no wise believe, though a man declare it 1788
unto you." ^ A^85
This may be a fitting place to insert a selection from
Wesley's letters, written in the previous six months.
The first was addressed to William Black, one of his mis-
sionaries in Nova Scotia. Black had related to Wesley the
cases of certain demoniacs, and particularly one which he
himself had seen. When Black approached, it was with the
utmost difficulty that four men could hold the poor wretch,
and prevent him doing the missionary serious injury. Black
immediately fell upon his knees, and began to pray. In an
instant, the frenzy of the man subsided ; and the lips, that a
few moments before had uttered blasphemy, began to syllable
the praises of the great Redeemer. Wesley's letter is as
follows.
" Gloucester, -/I/^rc/i 19, 1788.
" My dear Brother, — I am glad to find you are still going on in the
glorious work to which you are called. We have need to make haste
therein ; to use all diligence. For the work is great ; the day is short ;
and lonely is the night wherein no man can work.
"It is well that Satan is constrained to show himself so plainly in the case
of those poor demoniacs. Thereby, he weakens his own kingdom, and
excites us to assault him more zealously. In the beginning of the work
in England and Ireland, we had many cases of the kind. But he now
chooses to assault us by subtlety more than by strength.
" I wish you would do all you possibly can to keep our brethren in peace
with each other. Your pains will not be lost on poor John Mc Geary.
There is much good in him. Indeed, he is naturally of a bold, forward
temper ; but I hope his zeal is now according to knowledge.
" Praying that you may increase with all the increase of God, I am
your affectionate friend and brother,
"John Wesley." *
The next is brief, but interesting. Agnes Collinson was
now a remarkable child, twelve years old. Six years after-
ward.s, she became the wife of Mr. Joseph Bulmer ; and lived
to be the authoress of " Messiah's Kingdom," in twelve
books, 486 pages, and of the beautiful hymn, which is so
often sung at the laying of the foundation stones of
Methodist chapels, "Thou who hast in Zion laid," etc.
Mrs. Bulmer was born a poet, and, at the death of Charles
'Black's Memoirs, p. 219.
542 Life and Times of Wesley.
1788 Wesley, wrote an elegy, which was sent to the surviving
Age 85 brother, and evoked the following characteristic letter.
"My dear Maiden,— Beware of pride ; beware of flattery; suffer
none to commend you to your face ; remember, one good temper is of
more value, in the sight of God, than a thousand good verses. All
you want is to have the mind that was in Christ, and to walk as
Christ walked.
" I am, etc.,
"John Wesley."'
The following is now for the first time published. William
Simpson, to whom it was addressed, was assistant in the
Yarm circuit.
"Near Colne, April 2^, 1788.
"Dear Billy, — You did well to expel those who marry ungodly
persons, — a real evil, which we never can tolerate. You should speak to
every believer singly concerning meeting in band. There were always
some in Yarm circuit, though not many. No circuit ever did, or ever will
flourish, unless there are bands in the large societies. It is a good sign,
that so many of our preachers are willing to contribute to those necessary
expenses. They used to be much straitened in their bowels, whenever
money was wanted. You have now good encouragement to remain
another year in the circuit. But you know two preachers do not remain
in the same circuit more than one year.
" I am, dear Billy, your affectionate friend and brother,
"John Wesley."
Dr. Coke was an innovator. Finding that many of the
Dublin Methodists were in the habit of attending Dissenting
chapels on the sabbath, he, in order to prevent this, directed
that, on three Sundays out of four, there should be service in
Whitefriar Street chapel in church hours ; and that, on the
fourth, the Methodists should be recommended to attend St.
Patrick's church, and receive the sacrament.^ Henry Moore
was the assistant in the Dublin circuit ; was nearly as old a
man as Coke ; and, as a preacher, his superior. Coke's
assumption to act as Wesley's vicar gave great offence, and
the new arrangement had to be abandoned.^ The following
letters refer to this Dublin fracas, and are not without interest,
as evincing Wesley's persistent adherence to the Established
' Bulmer's Memoir, p. 4.
2 Smith's " Methodism in Ireland." ^ Ibid.
Separation from the Chiu'ch. 543
Church. The first three were addressed to Moore; the fourth 1788
to Coke. A^5
" Leeds, May 6, 1 788.
"Dear Henry, — The doctor is too warm. He ought to have had
more regard to so respectable a body of men as applied to him. I am a
Church of England man ; and, as I said fifty years ago, so I say still, in
the Church I will live and die, unless I am thrust out. We must have no
more service at Whitefriars in the church hours. Leave all contention
before it be meddled with. Follow after peace.
"I am, etc.,
"John Wesley."^
"Whitehaven, Afay 11, 1788.
"Dear Henry, — Still, the more I reflect, the more I am convinced,
that the Methodists ought not to leave the Church. I judge, that to lose
a thousand, yea, ten thousand, of our people, would be a less evil than
this. ' But many had much comfort in this.' So they would in any 7ie7i/
tiling. I believe Satan himself would give them comfort herein ; for he
knows what the end would be. Our glory has hitherto been not to be a
separate body :
' Hoc Ithacus veht.'
"But whatever Mr. Smyth does, I am for the old way. I advise you to
abide in it, till you find another new event, although, indeed, you may
expect it every day ; namely, the removal of your affectionate friend and
^™^^^^' " John Wesley.''^
" Glasgow, May 12, 1788.
" Dear Henry, — I allow two points : i. That, while Dr. Coke is in
Dublin, he may have service at eleven o'clock as before. 2. That, on
condition that our brethren will attend St. Patrick's one Sunday in four,
you may read prayers the other three in the room. When Dr. Coke
returns from Dublin, he should immediately send me word who is proper
to succeed you there. I shall be glad, if I can, to have Nancy and you
at Bristol next year. It is not unlikely, I may finish my course there ;
and, if so, I should love to have her to close my eyes. My brother said, I
should follow him within the year. But, be that as it may, by Gods help,
I will live to-day. « I am, etc.,
"John Wesley." s
" GLASGO^v, May 16, 1788.
Dear Sir, — I came hither this morning. There is a fair opening
at Dumfries, and a prospect of much good, I like your proposal concern-
ing Joseph Cownlcy,'' and will talk with him about it if 1 live to see
Newcastle.
' Manuscript letters in Mission House. * Ibid. ^Ibid.
* A proposal to ordain him. See Metliodist Magazine^ 1845, P- ^'2.
544 Life and Times of Wesley.
" As I said before, so I say still, I cannot, I dare not, leave the Church,
for the reasons we all agreed to thirty years ago in the conference at
Leeds. Thus far only I could go. On condition, that our people would
receive the Lord's supper once a month either at St. Patrick's, or their
own parish church (the reasonableness of which should be strongly and
largely explained),— on this condition, I would allow Henry Moore to
read the morning service at Whitefriars on the other Sundays.
" I wonder at the imprudence of Mr. Edward Smyth, to say nothing of
his unkindness. You did well in changing the stewards at Waterford.
" I am, dear sir, yours most affectionately,
" John Wesley." '
The following, hitherto unpublished, letter was addressed
to Thomas Taylor, then stationed at Manchester, and refers
to a gigantic evil which still exists.
"Near Newcastle, 7««^ 7, 1788.
" Dear Tommy, — I have no time to spend on controversy about the
Church, unless I had leisure to write a folio.
"It is no wonder, that everyone should be ruined who concerns himself
with that execrable bill trade. In London, I expel every one out of our
society who has anything to do with it. Whoever endorses a bill, (that is,
promises to pay,) for more than he is worth, is either a fool or a knave.
" I am, dear Tommy, your affectionate friend and brother,
" John Wesley."
When Wesley was at Bradford, in the month of May, he
preached in the parish church, and, in the course of his
sermon, quoted the opinion of Bengelius, that the millennial
reign of Christ would begin in the year 1836. Some one
present circulated this as the opinion of Wesley himself ; and,
as the opinion of such a man was regarded of high import-
ance, the rumoured prophecy ran throughout the kingdom,
and more than one of Wesley's friends wrote to ask if what
was said was true. The following is Wesley's reply to
Christopher Hopper.
"My dear Brother,— I said nothing, less or more, in Bradford
church, concerning the end of the world, neither concerning my own
opinion, but what follows :— That Bengelius had given it as his opinion,
not that the world would then end, but, that the millennial reign of
Christ would begin in the year 1836. I have no opinion at all upon the
head; I can determine nothing about it. These calculations are far
Manuscript letters in Mission House.
Separation from the Church. 545
above, out of my sight. I have only one thing to do, — to save my soul, 1788
and those that hear me. . ^
" I am, yours affectionately, ^^ ^
" John Wesley." '
We left Wesley celebrating his eighty-sixth birthday, in
his birthplace, Epworth. Here he preached four or five
sermons, held a lovefeast, and attended sacred service in his
father's church. He writes :
"Mr. Gibson read the prayers with seriousness, and preached a plain,
useful sermon ; but I was sorry to see scarce twenty communicants,
half of whom came on my account. I was informed, likewise, that
scarce fifty persons used to attend the Sunday service. What can be
done to remedy this sore evil ? I fain would prevent the members here
from leaving the Church ; but I cannot do it. As I\Ir. Gibson is not a
pious man, but rather an enemy to piety, who frequently preaches
against the truth, and those that hold and love it, I cannot, with all my
influence, persuade them either to hear him, or to attend the sacrament
administered by him. If I cannot carry this point even while I live, who
then can do it when I die ? And the case of Epworth is the case of every
church, where the minister neither loves nor preaches the gospel ; the
Methodists will not attend his administrations. What then is to be
done .?"
This is amusing. Here we find Wesley acknowledging,
that, in the very place where his father had been rector for
nearly forty years, the Methodists had, ipso facto, separated
from the Church, and that he, with all his influence, had not
sufficient power to hinder it.
During the next fortnight, Wesley preached, on an average,
twice a day, until his arrival in London, on July 15. The
following letters belong to this period. The first was
addressed to Mr. John Mann, one of his missionaries in Nova
Scotia.
" June 30, 1 7S8.
"My dear Brother, — I am greatly concerned for the prosperity of
the work of God in Nova Scotia. It seems some way to lie nearer my
heart than even that in the United States ; many of our brethren there
are, we may hope, strong in the Lord, and in the power of His might ;
but I look upon those in the northern provinces to be younger, and
tender children, and consequently to stand in need of our utmost care.
I hope all of you, that watch over them, are exactly of one mind, and of
one judgment ; that you take care always to speak the same things, and
to watch over one another in love.
* Wesley's Works, vol. xii., p. 298.
. VOL. in. N N
54^ Life a7id Times of Wesley.
1788 "Mr. Wray is a workman that need not be ashamed. I am glad to
."T^g- hear of his safe arrival. Although he has not much learning,^ he has,
what is far better, uprightness of heart, and devotedness to God. I
doubt not but he and you will be one, and go on your way hand in hand.
Whatever opposers you meet with, Calvinists, papists, antinomians, or
any other, have a particular care, that they do not take up too much
either of your thoughts or time. You have better work ; keep to your
one point, Christ dving for us, and living in us ; so will you fulfil the joy
of,
" My dear brethren, your affectionate friend and brother,
"John Wesley." 2
r
The following was addressed to Samuel Bradburn, and, up
to the present, has not been published.
"Epworth, July 6, 1788.
" Dear SAMMY,^To-morro\v evening, I hope to be at Doncaster ; on
Wednesday, at Sheffield ; and to-morrow sennight, at London, bring-
ing my daughter with me. That evening I should not object to preaching
at West Street. On Tuesday morning, I would breakfast in Chesterfield
Street, if my sister will be ready at eight o'clock. Then I must hide
myself till Sunday ; when I will preach at one or the other chapel for
Kingswood. Peace be with you and yours !
" I am, dear Sammy, etc.,
"John Wesley."
The next, addressed to Mr. Jasper Winscomb, is also now
for the first time printed.
"London, July 16, 1788.
"Dear Jasper, — If all our society at Portsmouth, or elsewhere, sepa-
rate from the Church, I cannot help it. But, I will not. Therefore, I can in
no wise consent to the having service in church hours. YoJi used to love
the Church ; then keep to it, and exhort all our people to do the same. If
it be true, that brother Hayter is used to talk against the other preachers,
as well as against Thomas Warwick, brother Hayter and I shall not agree.
Of dividing circuits we may speak at the conference.
" I am, dear Jasper, your affectionate brother,
"John Wesley."
The following also has not before been published. It was
' James Wray was a member of Wesley's legalised conference. After
travelling six years in English circuits, he now went, as an ordained
missionary superintendent to Nova Scotia. It is a curious fact that the
Nova Scotians objected to him, not only on the ground of his want of
learning, but because he was" ^« Englishman! On hearing of this,
Wesley, in an unpublished letter, wrote : " O American gratitude ! Lord,
I appeal to Thee ! "
2 Wesley's Works, vol. xiv., p. 343.
ei
Separation from the CJmrch. 547
addressed to "Mr. Churchcy, attorney at law, near the Hay, 1788
Brecon" ; and refers to certain poetical productions which actTss
Mr. Churchey wished to print.
" Near London, July 22, 1788.
My dear Brother,— I am glad you spoke to Mr. Cowper.» What
pity it is that such talents as his should be employed in so useless a
manner!
"Mr. Bradburn delivered your papers to me a few days ago ; but this
is so busy a time, that I had not leisure to go through them till to-day. In
the Transhxtion of the Art of Printing, tlierc are many very good lines;
but there are some that want a good deal of filing ; and many that are
obscure. The sense is so much clouded, that it is not easy to be under-
stood. For many years, I have not had any booksellers but Mr. Atlay
and my assistants. Some of the shorter copies are good sense and good
poetry.
" My dear brother has left a translation of the Book of Psalms, and
verses enough to make, at least, six volumes in duodecimo. I could but
ill spare him, now I am myself so far declined into the vale of years. But
it is the Lord ; let Him do what seemeth Him good. Our time is now
short. Let my dear sister Churchey, and you, and I make the best of it.
"I am your affectionate brother,
"John Wesley."
A week after the above letter was written, Wesley opened
his conference, which continued its sittings till August 6.
Besides presiding, he preached every evening, and on the
conference Sunday twice. The last day was kept as a solemn
fast, — prayer-meetings being held at five, nine, and one, and
the day concluded with a watchnight. No wonder, that the
old Methodist preachers returned from conferences, ' to their
respective circuits, like flames of fire. Wesley writes ;
" One of the most important points considered at this conference was
that of leaving the Church. The sum of a long conversation was : (i)
that, in a course of fifty years, we had neither premeditatedly nor will-
ingly varied from it in one article either of doctrine or discipline ; (2)
that we were not yet conscious of varying from it in any point of doc-
trine ; (3) that we have, in a course of years, out of necessity, not of
choice, slowly and warily varied in some points of discipline, by preach-
ing in the fields, by extemporary prayer, by employing lay preachers,
by forming and regulating societies, and by holding yearly conferences.
^ Cowper had recently published " The Task," and was now employed
in his translation of Homer. In another letter, Wesley says: "I think Mr.
Cowper has done as much as is possible to be done with his lamentable
story. I can only wish he had a better subject."
548 Life and Times of Wesley.
1788 But we did none of these things till we were convinced we could no
longer omit them, but at the peril of our souls."
Age 85
This was correct so far as it went ; but Wesley ought to
have added, the ordaining of preachers, the licensing of
chapels ; and, further, that in this selfsame year he had
published a i2mo volume of 430 pages, entitled, "The
Sunday Service of the Methodists ; with other Occasional
Services " ; in reality, an altered edition of the Prayer-Book
of the Church of England, attached to which was a " Collec-
tion of Psalms and Hymns for the Lord's Day," composed by
himself and his brother. Wesley, in his preface, says:
" Little alteration is made in the following edition of it, [The Prayer-
Book,] except in the following instances:
" I. Most of the holy days (so called) are omitted, as, at present,
answering no valuable end.
" 2. The service of the Lord's day, the length of which has often been
complained of, is considerably shortened.
"3. Some sentences, in the offices of baptism, and for the burial of the
dead, are omitted. And,
"4. Many psalms left out, and many parts of the others, as being
highly improper for the mouths of a Christian congregation."
Throughout his book, Wesley uses the word " minister,"
instead of the objectionable word " priest." The half popish
canticle in the morning prayer, " Benedicite, omnia opera," is
left out. In the communion service, the word " elder" is
used instead of " priest" ; and, in the public baptism of infants,
Wesley dispenses with signing the child with the sign of
the cross, and leaves out the sentence, in the thanksgiving,
that "it hath pleased God to regenerate this infant with His
Holy Spirit." The "order of confirmation" is omitted, and no
reference is made to godfathers and godmothers. The " order
for the visitation of the sick" is totally expunged, and of
course the popish absolution, " by His (Christ's) authority
committed to me, I absolve thee from all thy sins, in the
name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy
Ghost. Amen." In lieu of the three forms for ordaining
deacons, priests, and bishops, Wesley gives three for " ordain-
ing superintendents, elders, and deacons" Wesley takes equal
liberty with the articles of religion. Some are entirely
omitted ; others are abridged, or variously altered.
Sepa7'ation from the Church. 549
We find no fault with all this. Upon the whole, we regard 17^^
Wesley's expurgations as emendations.* His prayer-book is Age 85
purged from popish and Calvinian errors ; and, in that
respect, is superior to the prayer-book of the Church of
England. This, however, is not the point in question ; but
rather, whether, after Wesley had done all this, he could be
fairly and honestly considered a member and minister of the
Established Church. The Rev. G. Nott, in his Bampton
lecture, delivered eleven years after Wesley's death, elabo-
rately argued this matter, and returned a negative reply ; and,
we confess, it seems impossible to refute his general con-
clusion, namely, that both " Wesley and Whitefield are to be
regarded as separatists from the Church of England." ^ To
the day of his death, Wesley protested against this ; but his
warmest friends must admit that, though both were undeni-
ably sincere, yet, in this respect, profession and practice were
at variance.
Three years before this, he had ordained Joseph Taylor,
who, ever since, had preached in gown and bands, and ad-
ministered the sacraments in Scotland. Joseph was now
appointed to Nottingham circuit; and, of course, as an
ordained minister, dreamed that he was the same in England
as he had been in Scotland. But not so. Wesley, who, three
years before, had f rocked his itinerant for the people across
the Tweed, now unfrocked him for the people bordering on
the Trent. Hence the following.
" London, November 16, 1788.
"Dear Joseph, — I take knowledge of your spirit, and believe it is yout
desire to do all things right. Our friends in Newark should not have for-
gotten, that we have determined over and over 'not to leave the Church.'
Before they had given you that foolish advice, they should have consulted
me. I desire you would not wear the surplice, nor administer the Lord's
supper, any more.
" I am, dear Joseph, your affectionate friend and brother,
"John Wesley."3
Such was the frequent clashing between practice and pro-
> Except in the case of the psalms, where about thirty are discarded,
and about sixty mutilated. The propriety of this may be fairly doubted.
2 See Nott's Bampton Lecture, 1802.
» The Wesley an, Nov. 4, 1846.
550 Life and Times of Wesley.
fession. The prayer-book, above mentioned, had been put
into the hands of the Methodists ; and yet, because of its
alterations and abridgments, it was of no use in services con-
ducted in the Church of England. For what then was it
intended ? The following extract, from the minutes of con-
ference in 1/88, supplies an answer.
"(2- 21. What further directions may be given concerning the prayers
of the Church of England ?
"^. The assistants shall have a discretionary power to read the
Prayer-Book in the preaching houses on Sunday mornings, where they
think it expedient, if the generality of the society acquiesce with it; on
condition that Divine service never be perfoi-med in the church hours on
the Sundays when the sacrament is administered in the parish church
where the preaching house is situated; and that the people be strenuously
exhorted to attend the sacrament in the parish church on those Sundays."
This may be vaguely worded ; but there can be no mistake
about its meaning. By Wesley's authority, and that of his
conference, assistants everywhere were permitted to do what
Dr. Coke had authorised to be done in Dublin, namely, that,
on certain conditions, there should be Divine service in
Methodist chapels in the same hours as Divine service was
performed in the parish churches adjoining them. If this was
not separation, what was it .-'
There were two other points discussed at the conference of
1788, of great importance. Many of the preachers were
shamefully left without adequate support, and were actually
obliged, either to starve from hunger, or to go from house to
house to obtain their meals. Wesley was annoyed, perhaps
indignant; and, to remedy this glaring evil, the assistants
were directed to enforce, that every member, who could
afford it, should contribute, in the classmeetings, a penny
per week, and a shilling per quarter, at the quarterly visita-
tion, for the maintenance of the preachers appointed to
watch over them. And, in addition, Wesley issued the fol-
lowing address.
" To our Societies in England and Ireland.
" Fifty years ago, and for several years following, all our preachers
were single men, when, in process of time, a few of them married. Those
with whom they laboured maintained both them and their wives, there
being then no settled allowance either for the one or the other. But above
Dewsbiuy Chapel Case. 5 5 1
thirty years ago, it was found most convenient to fix a stated allowance 1788
for both,' and this was found by the circuits where they were stationed; — -
till one year some of the circuits complained of poverty. Dr, Coke and ^^ ^
I supplied what was wanting. The next year, the number of wives
increasing, three or four of them were supplied out of the contingent
fund. This was a bad precedent, for more and more wives were thrown
upon this fund, till it was likely to be swallowed up thereby.^ We could
think of no way to prevent this, but to consider the state of our societies
in England and Ireland, and to beg the members of each circuit to give
us that assistance which they can easily do without hurting their
families.
" Within these fifty years, the substance of the Methodists is increased
in proportion to their numbers. Therefore, if you are not straitened in
your own bowels, this will be no grievance, but you will cheerfully give
food and raiment to those who give up all their time, and strength, and
labour to your service.
" London, yf//'^'-/^j-/ 2, 1788. "John Wesley."
No wonder that, in his later years, Wesley so often wrote
and spoke of the corrupting influence of the riches of rich
Methodists !
The other affair, which demanded the attention of Wesley's
conference, in 1788, was equally unpleasant. Six years before,
as we have already seen, the trustees, at Birstal, claimed the
power of appointing preachers to their chapel. This was
followed by the deed of declaration in 1784. At the very
time this deed was being signed, the same subject was revived
at Devvsbury, a town contiguous to Birstal.
^ As a curious specimen of the way in which things were managed in
the early days of Methodism, the following extracts are given from " The
Dales" circuit book, whose accounts extend from 1765 to 1791. s. d.
"1765. Dec. 7. Thomas Rankin. Two meals, and horse one night i o
1766. March 29. John Ellis. Six meals, and horse three nights,
shirt washed, and pennyworth of paper 2 10
„ Sept. 28. Jeremiah Robertshaw. Twelve meals, and
horse four nights, and shirt washing 5 3"
The reader can calculate how many meals a day were allowed to these
godly men, and how much per meal. Besides these allowances for board,
each preacher was entitled to receive, as quarterage, for himself ;^3 ; and,
for his wife, if he had one, £z \os.
2 The contingent fund, raised by the yearly collection in the classes,
was originally intended to defray law expenses, and to pay, or reduce,
chapel debts. In this year, 1788, the income of the fund was ^^1203 "js. \d.,
out of which was paid for law expenses, ^37 4^. 2d.; for chapels,
£106 15^". od. ; and for the deficiencies of the preachers and their families,
;^433 i8i'. id. It was high time for Wesley to take action; though his
effort to correct the evil was without effect.
552 L'^fe ci^id Times of Wesley.
1788 Here it had been proposed to build a new chapel. Mr.
Ase~85 V^lton, the assistant, refused to move in the matter, unless it
was agreed that the chapel should be settled according to the
conference plan. Mr. Heald and some others wished to obtain
from Wesley certain concessions, and wrote to John Atlay,
the book steward, to secure them, Atlay replied as follows.
" London, February 22, 1784.
"My dear Sir, — I have, this morning, been with Mr. Wesley, and
have laid your letter before him.^ He is not only wilHng, but desires,
it be inserted in your deed, that, if ever the conference, or the
preacher appointed by conference, refuse or neglect to provide a preacher
for your chapel for three or four Sundays, then the trustees shall have
it in their own power to call one whom they please, and the power of
nomination shall be theirs in future.
" If any preacher, appomted to serve your chapel, should be proved
guilty of immorality, the trustees shall have a power to reject him ; and,
if the conference does not send another to fill up his place, you shall
have a power to call one to do it. "John Atlay."
On the receipt of this letter, Valton solicited subscriptions,
and preached at the laying of the foundation stone. ^
Five days after the date of the above letter, the deed of
declaration was executed ; and, among other names omitted,
in the constitution of the legal conference, were those of John
Atlay and William Eels, the first of whom had been a
preacher one-and-twenty years, and the second twelve. This,
by no means, increased Atlay 's loyalty. In an unpublished
letter, dated September 17, 1785, he writes: "Mr. Ilampson
is well provided for. I have begun to do a little business for
myself as coal merchant ; and have reason to think it will do
well for me. I have not left the book room, nor do I intend
^ In a i2mo pamphlet, published in 1788, and entitled, "A Reply to
what the Rev. Dr. Coke is pleased to call ' The State of the Dewsbury
House,' being a Vindication of the Conduct of the Trustees of that
House," — it is stated, that the questions proposed to Wesley by Mr.
Heald were: (i) ■■' If the conference should neglect to supply the house
with preachers, would it be understood to remain the property of the
conference, or would the trustees have a power to provide for themselves ?
(2) If any preacher, sent them, should be found guilty of immorality,
would the trustees have a power of rejecting him ?" It further states, that
the trustees had, in Wesley's own handwriting, a paragraph to the effect
that "the assistants and leaders were to be the proper judges" of a
preacher charged with immorality. This certainly clashes with Wesley's
letter, given hereafter, and dated July 30, 1788.
2 "The State of Dewsbury House," By Dr. Coke.
Dewsbiiry Chapel Case. 553
\\. at present. I have my trials ; but the disagreeable things 1788
I have met with, in our connexion, have really raised my Age 85
heart to God."
In another, bearing date, April iS, 1786, he says: "You
smile at my commencing coal merchant. There was a time
when I could have trusted to my good old friend " (Wesley)
" for everything that I wanted, or was likely to want ; but
late occurrences have given me a check ; and, I really think,
the thing is right in the sight of the Lord," He then proceeds
to state that he had lately been attending the ministry of
Mr. Latrobe, the Moravian minister, and that he increasingly
admired him every time he heard him.
These extracts may help to throw some light on Atlay's
subsequent conduct.
Meanwhile, Dewsbury chapel was completed, and a draft
of the trust deed was sent, by Parson Greenwood, to Man-
chester conference, in 1787, for perusal. This was handed
officially to Alexander Mather, who strongly objected to its
provisions ; and complained that the trustees had not inserted
a clause, to the effect, "that no preacher should be sent away
till he was tried, and found guilty, before his peers, or the
neighbouring assistant preachers." The trustees refused to
yield, thus, in reality, making themselves, as Dr. Coke put
it, "accusers, jury, judges, and executioners."^ Wesley had
^ By the kindness of Mr. Robinson, of Dewsbur)% we have before us a
copy of the original trust deed, from which we learn that, if, after a
vacancy, Wesley or the conference refused or neglected, for the space of
forty days, to appoint a preacher; or if the preacher appointed should
" not conduct or conform himself to the satisfaction of the trustees or,
the major part of them, it should be lawful for the said trustees, or such
major part, not only to displace such preacher, (after giving him one
month's previous notice thereof in writing.) but also to appoint such other
preacher as they should deem more proper, and better qualified to benefit
the society." I'he deed is dated January 31, 1788, and the names and
occupations of the trustees are as follows.
John Hcald, maltster.
John Robinson, weaver.
Joseph Gill, clothier.
John Beaumont, cordwaincr.
John Lancaster, currier.
John Howgate, sen., clothier,
John Howgate, jun., clothier.
Barlholmew Archer, clothier.
William Walker, clothier.
John Thorns, clothier.
Isaac Wilman, clothier.
Abraham Thomas, clothier.
Timothy Parker, clothier.
John Hirst, clothier.
Joseph Bennett, farmer.
Thomas Bromley, clolliier.
Benjamin Whitakcr, farmer.
554 Life and Times of Wesley.
1788 appointed Parson Greenwood and William Percival to the
Age85 t)ewsbury circuit ; but, on October 23, he instructed them to
abandon the chapel and to leave the trustees to provide for
themselves to their hearts' content.
Mr. Mather, at the time, was in the Sheffield circuit, and
obtained Wesley's consent to become mediator between
the contending parties. Accordingly he went, and pro-
posed to the trustees that they should have power: (i)
To mortgage the premises for the debt unpaid, (2) To
let the seats at any price they liked. (3) To appoint
their own stewards, and dispose of their own income.
He further proposed, that no assistant should expel a
trustee from the society but by the consent of the majority
of his co-trustees. All this was palatable; but what followed
was otherwise. Mather, of course, had no objection to a
preacher being dismissed for immorality, as was proposed in
Atlay's letter ; but he wished to institute a court in which
the accused might have a fair and impartial trial ; and., hence,
requested that a clause might be inserted in the trust deed,
providing that three of the nearest assistants should be
judges; that, if they found the charges proved, they should
join with the trustees in requesting Wesley, or the president
of the conference for the time being, to remove the guilty
preacher, and to send another in his place ; that, if this was
not done within a specified time, the trustees should do it
themselves ; and that, if the conference next ensuing did not
send another preacher, then the election of preachers was to
remain with the trustees, and the power of conference, to
appoint preachers to Dewsbury chapel, to be forfeited for
ever. This the trustees stubbornly rejected; and the further
consideration of the matter was postponed till February 5,
1788. At this second interview, it was proposed by Mr.
Mather, that an appeal should be made to the subscribers to
decide whether the clauses he had named should be inserted
in the deed ; and that their decision should be final. This
also was refused ; and now, when all further negotiation
seemed impossible, Mather, by Wesley's request, informed
the seatholders, " that they were not to pay any more rent
till the matter was settled between him and the trustees."
Thus the affair was left till the conference of 1788 ; when a
Dewsbury Chapel Case. 555
committee met on the subject. John Atlay was present, and 1788
remarked, that if he were to go down to Dewsbury he would AgeS-
soon settle matters with the trustees. Mather objected to
Atlay's suggestion, and said : " Mr, Atlay, it is reported, that
you have promised the trustees, that, if Mr. Wesley withdraws
the preachers from Dewsbury, you will yourself go and serve
them. I ask you then, before God and these brethren, have
you made any such promise, or have you not.'" Atlay
reluctantly acknowledged, that he had ; and, further, that he
had also advised the Methodists at Malton not to settle their
chapel on the conference plan. Next morning Wesley wrote
as follows. .
" To the Trustees 0/ Dewsbury.
" London, ^u/y 30, 1788.
" My dear Brethren, — The question between us is, * By whom shall
the preachers sent, from time to time, to Dewsbury be judged.'" You say,
' By the trustees.' I say, ' By their peers — the preachers met in con-
ference.' You say, 'Give up this, and we will receive them,' I say, ' I
cannot, I dare not, give up this.' Therefore, if you will npt receive them
on these terms, you renounce connection with your affectionate brother,
"John Wesley."
As the trustees still held out, the conference decided that
another deputation, consisting of Mather, Pawson, Thompson,
Greenwood, and Percival, should meet at Dewsbury on
August 14. The deputies asked, " Have you executed a trust
deed.''" The trustees answered, " Yes." "Can we see it .-* "
" No." " Will you add to it a clause such as Mr. Wesley
washes?" "No." Such, In substance, were the proceedings
of the meeting. The result was, as before stated, the
preachers, who had been appointed at Dewsbury, were at
once removed ; the chapel was abandoned ; and the preachers
in the Birstal circuit once more commenced Methodism at
Dewsbury, by preaching in the open streets.^
Five days after the date of the Dewsbury meeting, John
Atlay, who, as we have seen, had joined to Wesley's book
stewardship the business of a coal merchant, and had also been
toying with the Dewsbur}'- trustees, wrote as follows to Wesley.
"London, Auf^ist 19, 1788.
" Reverend and dear Sir, — I was in hopes matters at Dewsbury
' Mather's "State of Dewsbury House."
55^ Life and Times of Wesley.
T7B8 would have been made up; but, by a letter yesterday, I am informed
^^ o that their preachers are removed from them, and their place declared
"^ vacant; in consequence of which, the trustees have most solemnly called
me to come amongst them. They plead my promise ; and I cannot go
back from it. With me a promise is sacred, though it should be ever so
much to my hurt ; and, as to temporals, it must hurt me much. But I
regard not that, if there is a prospect that I shall be much more useful
there than I ever have been, or can be, in London. But it gives me more
pain than I can express, when I tell you that, in order to go there, I must
quit the book room. The longest that I can stay in it will be till the 25th
of September ; and, by that time, you will be able to get one for my place.
I think the fittest man in the world for it is Joseph Bradford. If he
should be appointed, he may come directly, and stay with us till we
go ; and, by that time, I could teach him more than he can learn in
three months without me ; but these things I leave to your superior
judgment.
" I have only now to request a few things of you. Do not be angry
with me for leaving you, after having spent fifteen of the best years of my
life in serving you, with more care, fear, labour, and pain, than all the
years of my life have produced. Do not blame me for going to a people
you have left ; they are the Lord's redeemed ones, and some of them
living members of His body. Do not disown me, nor forbid my preaching
in any of your places ; but give me leave, where and when it is agreeable
to the preachers, to preach in your houses. But if this request cannot be
complied with, then drop me silently ; and let me be of too little conse-
quence to say anything about me from the pulpit or press. I beg you will
write by return of post ; and do not write unkindly to your faithful servant
and friend,
"John Atlav.''^
Was this the whine of a mercenary man .'' or was it the
genuine effusion of a loving and honest heart .-' Tlie reader
must answer for himself; remembering, however, that the
Dewsbury chapel had been built, not by the money of the
trustees, but by the subscriptions of the Methodists ; that
three years previous to this, Atlay had entertained the
thought of ultimately leaving Wesley's stewardship, and,
with an eye to that, had begun the business of selling coals ;
and, further, that, since then, he had unquestionably en-
couraged the Dewsbury trustees in their rebellion, by
promising to become their preacher, when Wesley withdrew
his. What was Wesley's answer to his double dealing
friend .-*
1 " Letters by Rev. J. Wesley and Mr. John Atlay." 1790.
Dewsbiiiy Chapel Case. 557
"Pembroke, August 23, 1788. 1788
"My dear Brother, — If you are persuaded, that such a promise a^7~c
(which is the whole and sole cause of the breach at Dewsbury) is binding, ^
you must follow your persuasion. You will have blame enough from other
persons ; my hand shall not be upon you. If I can do you good, I will ;
but shall certainly do you no harm. George Whitfield is the person I
choose to succeed you. I wish you would teach him as much as you can
without delay.
" I am, with kind love to sister Atlay, your affectionate brother,
"John Wesley."
Thus did Wesley dispose of his book steward's mischievous
promise ; his pert nomination of Joseph Bradford as his
successor ; and his whimpering prayer that Wesley would not
punish him for his naughty tricks.
It is hardly necessary to insert the whole of the corre-
spondence. Suffice it to say, that Wesley requested Atlay,
before he left, to employ " one or two proper persons to take
an inventory of all the books in the shop and under the
chapel," so that George Whitfield might know what was
put into his care. Atlay's reply to this was the following.
" London, September 20, 1 788.
"Reverend and dear Sir, — We have almost this moment finished
our job of taking the stock ; and, as near as we can tell, your stock is this
day worth ;^I3, 751 iS-r. ^d., according to the prices fixed in the catalogue.
However, you may be sure it is not less than that. Most of these are
saleable things. You will be sure to find sale for them, if you live ; and,
if not, they will be of equal value to those to whom you leave them.
"I am, etc., "John Atlay."
Atlay went to Dewsbury on September 24, and took
possession of the chapel built with the money of Methodists,
We have before us a number of Mr. Pawson's letters, written
at this period, and in reference to the Dewsbury unpleasant-
ness. Pawson went, and preached to the discontented
Methodists ; and spent two days in endeavouring to put them
right ; but without effect. Mr. Mather was "highly offended"
on account of this ; and ]\Ir. Atlay wrote to Pawson " a
thundering letter." Under date of September 16, 1788,
Pawson says :
" You see the blessedness of striving to make peace. The assistants of
the neighbouring circuits are to preach in the streets at Dewsbury, in their
turns. This is pain and grief to me. To preach in opposition, Methodists
against Methodists, is painful beyond expression. I believe all might have
55^ Life and Times of Wesley.
1788 been prevented by loving-, prudent preachers. We have had a few un-
. ^ worthy men among us, who have been a great burden to us and to the
people ; but we do not lay them aside. Therefore, the people will oblige
us to do it, by making deeds like that at Dewsbury. Some of our
preachers do not live near to God, and do not endeavour, by reading and
prayer, to render themselves acceptable to the people. But now it seems
as though the people would make them look about them a little."
From other unpublished letters, we learn that Atlay and
Eels^ had large congregations ; that they had taken with
them the whole of the Dewsbury society, except a good man
and his wife, of the name of Drake ; and that one of the
trustees soon became a bankrupt, and was said to have
squandered a considerable amount of Atlay 's money.
Difficulties speedily ensued ; hence the following, extracted
from a letter dated
"BiRSTAL, December 18, 1789.
"... Mr. Atlay and Mr. Eels cannot supply the places they have
at present. They want another preacher, but cannot get one. They have
tried to get Mr. Holmes, who left us last conference, but he is engaged to
Sheerness, as the society there is divided. Besides, I understand, they
are all for the Church, and utterly against separation, ordination, etc. The
devil can no longer set themen of the world against us ; but he is trying
a much more effectual way, setting the people and preachers one
against another.
"John Pawson."^
Thus did Mr. Atlay really set up an iviperium in iinpcrio.
He called himself a Methodist ; and yet was setting
Methodism's founder at defiance. Not content with taking
possession of the Dewsbury circuit, he went to Shields, and
there, and in Newcastle, and other places, founded separate
societies. At length, he and his friend Eels quarrelled.
Hence the following.
"BiRSTAL, I\Iay 17, 1791.
"... Mr. Atlay and Mr. Eels have differed and parted. Mr. Atlay is
gone to London, and whether he will return to Dewsbury is quite un-
certain. I believe very few desire or expect it. He has treated Mr. Eels
in a very unkind and unbrotherly manner ever since he came to Dewsbury,
^ By some strange oversight, William Eels, at the conference of 1788,
was left without an appointment ; and, at the time of Atlay's arrival
there, was actually at Dewsbury, endeavouring to make peace. Hearing
of this, and mistaking Eels' motive, Mr. Mather impetuously took steps
to prevent his preaching in other Methodist pulpits. " This was the only
cause of his uniting with John Atlay." — (Pawson's manuscripts.)
^ Unpublished letter.
Age 85
yohri At /ay and Williain Eels. 559
and Mr. Eels was determined to bear it no longer. The trustees had a 1788
meeting, and determined that Mr. Eels should stay, and be, in every
respect, equal to Mr. Atlay. They are greatly displeased with Mr. Atlay's
conduct, as well as with his doctrines. He has got deep into Mr.
Manners' ^ opinions, and says that he has believed them these twenty
years. Mr. Eels is very friendly, and I believe most sincerely wishes a
reconciliation, and I hope will endeavour to bring it about.
"John Pawson."^
William Eels died within two years after this. In the
meantime, the Dewsbury trustees began to entertain " shock-
ing opinions" of their friend Atlay ; and in September, 1792,
sent for Pawson to effect a reunion.^
We need not pursue the subject farther. Here we have
the rise, the progress, and collapse of the Atlayite rebellion.
We could give a number of Atlay's letters, showing that, in
1789, he coquetted with Alexander McNab, and tried to secure
the co-operation of James Oddie. But the traitorous book
steward has already occupied more space than his worth
deserves. We only add, that, to all his other faults, he
added that of circulating the most infamous reports reflecting
on Wesley's moral character ;* which extorted from Wesley
the following characteristic " Word to whom it may Concern,"
inserted in his Magazine iox 1790, just after the appearance
of Atlay's pamphlet on the subject.
"In August, 1788, Mr. Atlay wrote me word, *I must look out for
another servant, for he would go to Dewsbury on September 25.' So far
was I from 'bidding him go,' that I knew nothing of it till that hour.
But I then told him, ' Go and serve them ' : seeing I found he would serve
me no longer.
"He sent me word that I had in London ;!^i3,75i iSj. ^d., stock in
books. Desiring to know exactly, I employed two booksellers to take an
account of my stock. The account they brought in, October 31, 1788,
was :
'Value of stock, errors excepted, ^4827 \os. i)\d.
'John Parsons,
Thomas Scollick.'
^ Nicholas Manners was one of Wesley's itinerant preachers from 1759
to 1784. He was an able man. His heresy, in substance, was, that, in
consequence of the work and death of Christ, all men arc born in the
same state as that in which Adam stood previous to his fall.
2 Unpublished letter. ^ Pawson's manuscript letters.
^ We have, in manuscript, his most malignant slander, but prefer with-
holding it. No wonder John Atlay wrote, in a letter to Mr. Mcrryweather,
of Yarm, in 1785, "You know I never mount high in profession of grace."
Age 8S
560^ Life aitd Times of Wesley.
178S "Why did John Atlay so wonderfully overrate my stock? Certainly
to do me honour in the eyes of the world.
" I never approved of his going to Devvsbury ; but I submitted to what
I could not help.
" With respect to Dewsbury House, there never was any dispute about
the property of preachins^ houses, that was an artful misrepresentation ;
but merely the appointing of preachers in them.
" If John Atlay has a mind to throw any more dirt upon me, I do not
know I shall take any pains to wipe it off. I have but a few days to live j
and I wish to spend those in peace.
" London, />(^. 25, 1790, "John Wesley."
These are long, perhaps tedious, statements ; but they are
not without interest, as helping to illustrate the life and
character of Wesley. His career was a long continued scene
of trouble. Mobs assailed him first ; then parsons and
pamphleteers ; then his friends, the Calvinists ; and, last of
all, his vexations were chiefly those occasioned by some of his
own faithless followers.
Not to return to Dewsbury, it may be added here,
that, at the conference of 1789, the preachers subscribed
i^2o6 towards the erection of a new chapel ; and Wesley
issued two circulars, stating the case to the Methodists in
general, and asking their assistance. After mentioning that
the former chapel had been built by the contributions of the
people, (the trustees themselves not giving a quarter of what it
cost,) he continues :
" Observe, here is no dispute about the right of houses at all. I have
no right to any preaching house in England. What I claim is, a right of
stationing the preachers. This these trustees have robbed me of in the
present instance. Therefore, only one of these two ways can be taken ;
either to sue for this house, or to build another : we prefer the latter,
being the most friendly way.
" I beg, therefore, my brethren, for the love of God ; for the love of me,
your old and well-nigh worn out servant ; for the love of ancient Method-
ism, which, if itinerancy is interrupted, will speedily come to nothing ;
for the love of justice, mercy, and truth, which are all so grievously violated
by the detention of this house ; that you will set your shoulders to the
necessary work. Be not straitened in your own bowels. We have never
had such a cause before. Let not then unkind, unjust, fraudulent men,
have cause to rejoice in their bad labour. This is a common cause.
Exert yourselves to the utmost. I have subscribed ;^5o. So has Dr. Coke.
The preachers have done all they could. O let them that have much give
plentcously ! Perhaps, this is the last labour of love I may have occasion
Itinerancy. 561
to recommend to you ; let it then stand as one more monument of your 1788
real gratitude to, my dear brethren, your old, affectionate brother, :
"John Wesley."' se»S
We now return to the conference of 1788. These were
not the only things to try Wesley's patience. An effort was
made to set aside the itinerant plan in Scotland, — a plan to
which, as already shown, Wesley attached the utmost im-
portance. This evoked the following letter to Lady Maxwell.
" London, August 8, 1788.
" Alv DEAR Lady, — It is certain, many persons, both in Scotland and
England, would be well pleased to have the same preachers always. But
we cannot forsake the plan of acting, which we have followed from the
beginning. For fifty years, God has been pleased to bless the itinerant
plan ; the last year most of all ; it must not be altered, till I am removed;
and, I hope, it will remain till our Lord comes to reign upon earth.
"John Wesley."2
To the same effect was another, written three months later,
and addressed to Jasper Winscomb.
" London, November 8, 1 788.
"Dear Jasper, — William Cashman advised you like a heathen. Mr.
Valton deserves pay, as well as you do. But he does not want it, and,
therefore, scorns to take it, knowing the poverty of the land.
" I am glad to hear so good an account of the Isle of Wight. The
work of God will flourish there, if it be steadily pursued.
" No preacher ought to stay either at Portsmouth, or Sarum, or any
other place, a whole week together. That is not the Methodist plan at
all. It is a novel abuse.
" I am, dear Jasper, your affectionate brother,
"John Wesley."^
On the loth of August, Wesley set out for Wales and the
west of England ; generally preaching twice a day, and on the
Sundays thrice, and everywhere to crowded congregations.
On the 28th of September, he returned to London, and,
two days after, went off to Norfolk. The remainder of the
year was employed, as usual, in the metropolis and the
surrounding counties.
These were not pleasure trips ; but made in wintry weather,
in frost and snow ; the veteran of eighty-five preaching
"^ Methodist Magazine, 1790, p. 103.
' Wesley's Works, vol. xii., p. 328.
^ Methodist Magazine, 1859, p. 247.
VOL. in. 00
562 Life and Times of Wesley.
1788 almost daily, both night and morning-, and attending to a
Age 85 thousand things which demanded his attention.^ He writes.
" December 10, and the following days, I corrected my brother's
posthumous poems ; being short psalms, and hymns on the four gospels,
and the Acts of the Apostles. They make five volumes in quarto, contain-
ing eighteen or nineteen hundred pages. Many of them are little, if any,
inferior to his former poems, having the same justness and strength
of thought, with the same beauty of expression ; yea, the same keenness
of wit on proper occasions, as bright and piercing as ever. Some are
bad; some mean; some most excellently good. They give the true
sense of Scripture, always in good English, generally in good verse ;
many of them are equal to most, if not to any, he ever wrote ; but
some still savour of that poisonous mysticism, with which we were both
not a little tainted before we went to America. This gave a gloomy
cast, first to his mind, and then to many of his verses ; this made him
frequently describe religion as a melancholy thing ; this so often
sounded in his ears, 'To the desert!' and strongly persuaded in favour
of solitude."
What had Wesley to say respecting himself? He writes.
"About this time " [December 15] " I was reflecting on the gentle steps
whereby age steals upon us. Take only one instance. Four years ago,
my sight was as good as it was at five-and-tvventy. I then began to
observe, that I did not see things quite so clear with my left eye as with
my right ; all objects appeared a little browner to that eye. I began next
to find a little difficulty in reading a small print by candlelight. A year
after, I found it in reading such a print by daylight. In the winter of
1786, I could not well read our four shilling hymn-book, unless with a
large candle ; the next year, I could not read letters, if wrote with a small
or bad hand. Last winter, a pearl appeared on my left eye, the sight of
which grew exceeding dim. The right eye seems unaltered; only I am
a great deal nearer sighted than ever I was. Thua are ' those that look
out at the windows darkened'; one of the marks of old age. But, I bless
' Among other places, he preached at Sevenoaks, and is said to have
used these words : " When a sinner is awakened, the baptists begin to
trouble him about outward forms, and modes of worship, and that of
baptism. They had better cut his throat," etc. Whether the exact
words were used we have no means of knowing ; but a warm controversy
sprung out of the affair. Mr. William Kingsford issued " A Vindication
of the Baptists from the Criminality of a Charge exhibited against them
by the Rev. Mr. Wesley." This was answered by T. C, supposed by
Kingsford to be the Rev. Mr. Coleman. (Query Thomas Coke .'') And
this was replied to by Kingsford m a shilling pamphlet, bearing the
title, " Three Letters to the Rev. Mr. Wesley, containing remarks on
a Piece lately published, with his approbation, and Three Challenges
to all the Methodists in the Kingdom." The whole thing was "much
ado about nothing."
Age 85
Wesley witJioiit a Scrmojt. 563
God, 'the grasshopper is' not 'a burden.' I am still capable of travelling, 1788
and my memory is much the same as it ever was ; and so, I think, is my
understanding."
Thus did Wesley take stock of himself.
On Christmas day, he preached at four o'clock in the
morning, in City Road, again at eleven, and in West
Street in the evening. On the last Sunday in the year, he
had an exceedingly large congregation in Allhallows church,
Lombard Street ; and, concerning this, there is an anecdote
worth relating. The sermon was for the benefit of forty-eight
poor children belonging to St. Ethelburga society. " Sir," said
Wesley to his attendant while putting on his gown, " it is above
fifty years since I first preached in this church ; I remember it
from a particular circumstance. I came without a sermon ;
and, going up the pulpit stairs, I hesitated, and returned into
the vestry, under much mental confusion and agitation. A
woman, who stood by, noticed my concern, and said, ' Pray,
sir, what is the matter.''' I replied, *I have not brought a
sermon with me.' Putting her hand on my shoulder, she
said, 'Is that all.'' Cannot you trust God for a sermon?'
This question had such an effect upon me, that I ascended
the pulpit, preached extempore, with great freedom to
myself, and acceptance to the people ; and have never since
taken a written sermon into the pulpit." ^ "A word spoken
in due season, how good is it !"
Wesley's publications, in 1788, have all been noticed,
except his Magazine ; and, concerning this, it is not needful
to say much. There are, as usual, six new sermons from
the venerable editor's own pen : namely. On Reproving Sin;
The Signs of the Times; Man; The Ministry of Wicked
Ministers ; Conscience ; and Faith.
Wesley concludes the first of these thus :
" I have now only a few words to add unto you, my brethren, who are
vulgarly called Methodists. I never heard or read of any considerable
revival of religion, which was not attended with a spirit of reproving. I
believe, it cannot be otherwise ; for what is faith unless it worketh by
love? Thus it was in every part of England, when the present revival of
religion began about fifty years ago. All the subjects of that revival, —
all the Methodists, in every place, were reprovers of outward sin. And,
"^ Methodist Magazine, 1825, p. 105.
564 Life and Times of Wesley.
1788 indeed, so are all that, being justified by faith, have peace with God
J'^ g through Jesus Christ. Such they are at first ; and if they use that
*" precious gift, it will never be taken away. Come, brethren ! In the name
of God, let us begin again ! Rich or poor, let us all arise as one man !
And, in any wise, let every man rebuke his neighbour, and not suffer sin
upon him !"
Wesley's sermon, on attending the ministry of unconverted
ministers, would never have been written, had he not been
pressed by the objections of Methodists, and yet determined
to prevent their leaving the Established Church. Its argu-
ments are specious, not sound. It might puzzle the simple
minded Methodists ; but it would not convince them they
were wrong. It was a feeble attempt to get converted people
to sit under an unconverted ministry. We conclude with
one extract.
" It has been loudly affirmed, that most of those persons now in con-
nection with me, who believe it their duty to call sinners to repentance,
having been taken immediately from low trades, tailors, shoemakers, and
the like, are a set of poor, stupid, illiterate men, that scarce know their
right hand from their left ; yet, I cannot but say, that I would sooner cut
off my right hand, than suffer one of them to speak a word in any of our
chapels, if I had not reasonable proof, that he had more knowledge in
the holy Scriptures, more knowledge of himself, more knowledge of God
and of the things of God, than nine in ten of the clergymen I have
conversed with, either at the universities, or elsewhere. Undoubtedly,
there are many clergymen in these kingdoms, that are not only free from
outward sin, but men of eminent learning, and, what is infinitely more,
deeply acquainted with God. But, still, I am constrained to confess, that
the far greater part of those ministers I have conversed with, for above
half a century, have not been holy men, — not devoted to God, — not
deeply acquainted either with God or themselves."
Such was Wesley's reluctant confession ; and yet, to
prevent what he called a separation from the Established
Church, he elaborately persuades the Methodists, that they
ought to receive the sacraments from these men ; instead of
requiring them at the hands of the converted artisans, who
had preached so successfully, and who, according to Wesley's
own confession, were, even in point of scripticral knozvlcdgc, the
superiors of the unconverted gentlemen, trained in colleges,
and made priests or deacons — not by Christ, — but by bishops!
I7S9.
WESLEY wrote : 1789
"January i, 1789 — If this is to be the last year of my Hfe, ATTse
according to some of those prophecies, I hope it will be the best. I am
not careful about it, but heartily receive the advice of the angel in Milton, —
' How well is thine ; how long, permit to Heaven.'
"January 5 — I once more sat for my picture. Mr. Romney is a painter
indeed. He struck off an exact likeness at once; and did more in an
hour than Sir Joshua did in ten.*
" January 9 — I left no money to any one in my will, because I had none.
But now, considering that, whenever I am removed, money will soon arise
by sale of books, I added a few legacies by a codicil, to be paid as soon
as may be. But I would fain do a little good while I live ; for who can
tell what will come after him ? "
"January 11 — I again warned the congregation, as strongly as I could,
against conformity to the world. But who will take the warning? If
hardly one in ten, yet is my record with the Most High.''
"January 20 — I retired in order to finish my year's accounts. If
possible, I must be a better economist; for, instead of having anything
beforehand, I am now considerably in debt ; but this I do not like. I
would fain settle even my accounts before I die."
It was at this period that the following unpublished letter
was written. Duncan McAllum had been ordained by-
Wesley in 1787, and the reader Avill observe that, instead
of addressing him as he addressed his preachers in general,
he gives him the title of ** reverendi"
" London, January 20, 1 789.
"Dear Duncan, — By all means choose trustees without delay; and
let them be such as belong to the circuit ; only such as you can depend
upon, both for judgment and honesty. I think it is by prayer that
you must alter the purpose of the Earl of Findlater. I am not
at all surprised at the behaviour of John Atlay. In a year or two, he
will find whether he has changed for the better. He was the first occa-
sion of the division at Dewsbury, by sending word to the trustees, that,
* The photographic portrait, in the present volume, is taken from
Romney's painting, by the kind permission of its possessor, the Rev. G.
Stringer Rovve.
566 Life and Times of Wesley.
1780 ^^ ^^ conference would not supply them with preachers, he would come
himself, and settle among them.
Age 86 u J ^^ •w'x'Ca. love to sister McAllum, your affectionate friend and
^^°^^^''' "John Wesley.
"To the Rev. Mr. McAllum, Inverness."
Four days later, he wrote as follows to Freeborn Garretson,
in America.
" London, January 24, 1 789.
" My dear Brother, — It signifies but little where we are, so we are
but fully employed for our good Master. Whether you went, therefore, to
the east, it is all one, so you were labouring to promote His work. You
are following the order, of His providence, wherever it appeared, as a
holy man expressed it, in a kind of holy disordered order. But there is
one expression, that occurs twice or thrice in yours, which gives me
some concern: you speak of finding freedom to do this or that. This
is a word much liable to be abused. If I have plain Scripture, or plain
reason, for doing a thing, — well. These are my rules, and my only rules.
I regard not whether I had freedom or no. This is an unscriptural
expression, and a very fallacious rule. I wish to be in every point, great
and small, a scriptural, rational Christian.
" I am, your affectionate friend and brother,
"John Wesley." ^
At the end of January, Wesley went to open new chapels at
Rye and Winchelsea. Returning to London, the month of
February was spent in preaching, in writing, in meeting
classes and the local preachers, and in ordaining Henry
Moore and Thomas Rankin, the last of his preachers upon
whom he laid his hands.^
The following anecdotes, related in the Life of Moore,
belong to the present year, and are strikingly characteristic
of Wesley and his friends.
One of the leading men, in the London circuit, (though
not a member,) had been in the habit of receiving the
sacrament from the hands of Wesley and his brother clergy-
men, but had fallen into sin. Henry Moore waited upon
him for an explanation of his conduct, and, not being
satisfied, told him he should be obliged to refuse him a
note of admission to the Lord's supper. The gentleman
was annoyed, and went to one of Wesley's clergy, whom
he persuaded to apply to Wesley on his behalf Entering
the vestry while Wesley was writing the note, Moore with
^ Life of Garretson. ^ Methodist Magazine, 1 867, p. 623.
Anecdotes of Wesley. 567
his honest sternness accosted him: "Sir, do you mean to 1789
give a note of admission to Mr. ?" "Yes, Henry," a^86
repHed Wesley, " I have reason to beUeve the report of his
conduct is a mistake." " I have fully examined it," answered
Moore, "and I find it no mistake; and, if you give him a
note, I shall not take the sacrament myself" Wesley, in
reply, observed, " I would take the sacrament if the devil
himself were there." " So would I," said Moore, " but not
if you gave him a note of admission." The Irishman came
off with flying colours ; for Wesley put the note into the fire,
and left the erring one to think and to repent.
Mrs. Hall was Wesley's only surviving sister, and was an
inmate of his house, but not a Methodist. One day, the two
called on Henry Moore. " Brother," said Mrs. Hall, " I
should like to attend the religious meetings of your people.
Have I your leave.''" "O yes," said he, "you may goto
them." " Then," rejoined this friend of the great Dr.
Johnson, "having your permission, I shall not ask that of
any one else." " Yes, you must ;" replied her brother, remem-
bering that Moore was circuit assistant, " when I am not here,
you must ask leave of Henry Moore."
In these days, it was customary for the itinerant and local
preachers to take breakfast together, on Sunday mornings, at
City Road. On one occasion, when Wesley was present, a young
man rose and found fault with one of his seniors. The Scotch
blood of Thomas Rankin was roused, and he sharply rebuked
the juvenile for his impertinence ; but, in turn, was as sharply
rebuked himself. Wesley instantly replied : " I will thank the
youngest man among you to tell me of any fault you see in
me ; in doing so, I shall consider him as my best friend."
This was quite enough to silence Rankin.
"Henry Moore," saiid W^esley, "you are a witness that what
John Atlay said, when he left us, is untrue. He said, * Mr.
Wesley could never bear a man who contradicted him.' Now
no man in England has contradicted me as much as you have
done; and yet, Henry, I love you still. You are right."
Hundreds of such anecdotes might be given : these must
serve as specimens.
On Sunday, the 1st of March, after preaching to two
crowded congregations, in City Road, Wesley and three of
568 Life and Times of Wesley.
his preachers took coach for Bath ; and " spent," says he, " a
comfortable night, partly in sound sleep, and partly in singing
praise to God." Such, after a hard day, at seven o'clock in a
winter's night, was the start of an old man of eighty-six, on a
five months' preaching tour 1
At Bath and Bristol, he spent a fortnight, in preaching and
meeting classes, and then set out for Ireland. On the way, he
preached at Stroud, Gloucester, and Tewkesbury. At Bir-
mingham, he opened a new chapel, and remarks : " Saturday,
March 21 — I had a day of rest, only preaching morning and
evening." The passage from Holyhead, instead of occupying
four hours, as at present, occupied thirty-six, and, during it,
the venerable voyager was a serious sufferer. " I do not
remember," he writes, " that I was ever so sick at sea before ;
but this was little to the cramp which held most of the night
with little intermission." He arrived at Dublin quay at eight
on Sunday morning, and, notwithstanding the illness from
which he had suffered, went direct to Dublin chapel, and
"preached on the sickness and recovery of King Hezekiah
and King George," and afterwards administered the sacra-
ment to about five hundred people.
At this sacramental service, he employed his assistant,
William INIyles, in giving the cup to the communicants; an
act which occasioned huge offence, for William Myles was not
ordained. In the week following, a long paragraph appeared
in the Dublin Evening Post, setting forth, that " the ChurcJi
was in danger! and calling upon the archbishop to use his
authority; for a Mr. William Myles, a layman, had assisted
Mr. Wesley in administering the Lord's supper; the greatest
innovation that had been witnessed for the last fifty years !"
" This brought on," says Mr. Myles, " a newspaper contro-
versy, which continued for three months. My name was
bandied about to some purpose ; but I endeavoured in
patience to possess my soul. At the expiration of the three
months, the subscribers desired the printer to put no more
Methodist nonsense into his paper ; and he had the good
sense to listen to the requisition of his customers, which
happily terminated this exquisitely silly controversy."^
^ Methodist Magazine, 1797, p. 313.
Separation from the Church. 569
On Wesley's arrival at Dublin, he had, to use his own 17^9
expression, " letter upon letter," concerning the alteration in Age 86
the Sunday service, which had been introduced by Dr. Coke ;
and, hence, he addressed the following.
" To certain Persons in Dublin.
"Whitefriar Street, Dublin, MarcJt 31, 1789,
"My dear Brethren,— I much approve of the manner and spirit
wherein you write concerning these tender points. I explained myself
upon them, in some measure, on Sunday : I will do it more fully now.
"At present, I have nothing to do with Dr. Coke: but I answer for
myself. I do not separate from the Church, nor have any intention so to
do. Neither do they, that meet on Sunday noon, separate from the
Church, any more than they did before : nay, less ; for they attend the
church and sacrament oftener now than they did two years ago.
"'But this occasions much strife.' True; but they make the strife
who do not attend the service. Let them quietly either come or stay
away, and there will be no strife at all.
" ' But those that attend say, those that do not are fallen from grace.'
No, they do not give them a bad word ; but they surely will fall from
grace, if they do not let them alone who follow their own consciences.
"But you 'fear this will make way for a total separation from the
Church.' You have no ground for this fear. There can be no such
separation while I live. Leave to God what may come after.
" But, to speak plainly, do not you separate from the Church 1 Yea,
much more than those you blame ? Pray, how often have you been at
church since Christmas.'* Twelve times in twelve weeks? And how long
have you been so fond of the Church ? Are you fond of it at all ? Do
not you go oftener to a Dissenting meeting than either to St. Patrick's, or
your parish church ?
"My dear brethren, you and I have but a short time to stay together.
* My race of glory is run, and race of shame; and I shall shortly be with
those that rest.' Therefore, as one that loves you well, and has loved you
long, I advise you, in the presence and in the fear of God: (i) Either
quietly attend the Sunday service, or quietly refrain from it ; then there
will be no strife at all. Now you make the strife of which you complain.
(2) Make not this a pretence for being weary of well doing. Do not, for
so poor a reason, withdraw your subscription from the school or the
preachers. What a miserable revenge would this be ! Never let it be
said, that my friend A ■ K , that brother D , or B , were
capable of this. From this hour, let this idle strife be buried in eternal
oblivion. Talk not of it any more. If it be possible, think not of it any
more. Rather think, 'the Judge standeth at the door;' let us prepare
to meet our God !
" John Wesley." >
^ Wesley's Works, vol. xiii., p. 253.
5/0 Life and Times of Wesley.
1789 Such was Wesley's attempt to defend the Dubhn Methodist
Age 86 service in church hours ; or rather, such was his attack on
those who were opposed to it. No doubt his accusations were
founded upon facts; but this was hardly an answer to the
argument of objectors, that having service in church hours
was, ipso facto, separation from the Church. He tells us, that
one consequence of Dr. Coke's new arrangement was, that
three times more Methodists now went to St. Patrick's, on the
first Sunday in every month, than had done for ten or twenty
years before ; and that, on the first Sunday of April, when
he went himself, many of them went with him ; the number
of communicants being about five hundred, or, in other
words, more communicants, on that single Sunday, than St.
Patrick's used to have the whole year round, before the
Methodists were known in Ireland. The arrangement, says
Wesley, that the Methodists in Dublin should have service in
church hours, " on condition that they would attend St.
Patrick's every first Sunday in the month, was made, not to
prepare for, but to prevent, a separation from the Church."
There can be no question, that this was Wesley's wish; but
it may be doubted whether it was Dr. Coke's intention.
During this Dublin fracas, Wesley sent, at least, one letter
to the public papers. The following is an extract,
" To the Printer of the '■Dublin Chronicle.^
" Londonderry, June 2, 1789.
"Sir, — As soon as I was gone from Dublin, the Observer came forth,
only with his face covered. Afterwards, he came out, under another
name, and made a silly defence for me, that he might have the honour of
answering it. His words are smoother than oil, and flow (who can
doubt it .'') from mere love both to me and the people.
'• But what does this smooth, candid writer endeavour to prove, with all
the softness and good humour imaginable ? Only this point, (to explain
it in plain English,) that I am a double tongued knave, an old crafty
hypocrite, who have used religion merely for a "cloak, and have worn a
mask for these fifty years, saying one thing and meaning another. A
bold charge this, only it happens that matter of fact contradicts it from
beginning to end."
Wesley then proceeds to give an outline of his history
from his youth to the time when he took the French churches
in West Street, Seven Dials, and in Spitalfields, and he and his
brother began to preach in them in church hours ; and states
't>^
Separation from the C/iiwch. 571
that the two archbishops of Canterbury, Potter and Seeker, 17S9
and the two bishops of London, Gibson and Lowth, never ^"§5
blamed them for this, or thought or called it separation from
the Church ; only, on one occasion, Archbishop Potter said :
" These gentlemen are irregular ; but they have done good,
and I pray God to bless them." Wesley continues :
" It may be observed that, all this time, if my brother or I were ill, I
desired one of our other preachers, though not ordained, to preach in
either tof the chapels, after reading part of the Church prayers. This
both my brother and I judged would endear the Church prayers to them,
whereas, if they were used wholly to extemporary prayer, they would
naturally contract a kind of contempt, if not aversion, to forms of prayer;
so careful were we, from the beginning, to prevent their leaving the
Church.
"When the Rev. Mr. Edward Smyth came to live in Dublin, he
earnestly advised me to leave the Church ; meaning thereby, (as all
sensible men do,) to renounce all connection with it, to attend the services
of it no more, and to advise all our societies to take the same steps. I
judged this to be a matter of great importance, and would, therefore, do
nothing hastily ; but referred it to the body of preachers, then met in
conference. We had several meetings, in which he proposed all his
reasons for it at large. They were severally considered, and answered,
and we all determined not to leave the Church.
"A year ago, Dr. Coke began officiating at our chapel in Dublin.
This was no more than had been done in London for between forty and
fifty years. Some persons immediately began to cry out, ' This is leaving
the Church, which Mr, Wesley has continually declared he would never
do.' And I declare so still. But I appeal to all the world, I appeal to
common sense, I appeal to the Observer himself, could I mean hereby,
' I will not have service in church hours' ? No ; but I denied, and do deny
still, that this is leaving the Church, either in the sense of Bishop Gibson,
or of Mr. Smyth at the Dublin conference. Yet, by this outcry, many well
meaning people were frighted well-nigh out of their senses.
" ' But see the consequence of having Sunday service here ! See the
confusion this occasioned !' Some time since, while a popular preacher
was preaching at Leeds, one cried out, ' Fire ! Fire ! ' The people took
fright, some leaped over the gallery, and several legs and arms were
broken. But upon whom were these consequences to be charged ? Not
on the preacher, but on him that made the outcry. Apply this to the
present case. I have kindled no more fire in Dublin than I did in
London. It is the Observer and a few other mischief makers, who
fright the people out of their senses ; and they must answer to God
for the consequence.
" This is my answer to them that trouble me, and will not let my grey
hairs go down to the grave in peace. I am not a njari of duplicity ; I am
not an old hypocrite, a double tongued knave. More than forty years, I
572 Life and Times of Wesley.
lySg have frequented Ireland. I have wished to do some good here. I now
' tell a plain tale, that 'the good that is in me may not be evil spoken of.'
^ I have no temporal end to serve. I seek not the honour that cometh of
men. It is not for pleasure, that, at this time of life, I travel three or four
thousand miles a year. It is not for gain.
* No foot of land do I possess,
No cottage in this wilderness ;
A poor wayfaring man,
I lodge awhile in tents below,
Or gladly wander to and fro,
Till I my Canaan gain.'
"John Wesley.
"P.S. At the desire of a friend, I add a few words in answer to one
or two other objections.
" First. When I said, ' I believe I am a scriptural bishop,' I spoke on
Lord King's supposition, that bishops and presbyters are essentially one
order.
" Secondly. I did desire Mr. Myles to assist me in delivering the cup.
Now, be this right or wrong, how does it prove the point now in question,
that I leave the Church ? I ask (2) What law of the Church forbids this .''
And (3) What law of the primitive church 1 Did not the priest in the
primitive church send both the bread and wine to the sick by whom he
pleased, though not ordained at all ?
" Thirdly. The Observer affirms, * To say you will not leave the
church, meaning thereby all true believers in England, is trifling.' Cer-
tainly ; but I do not mean so when I say, ' I will not leave the Church.'
I mean, unless I see more reason for it than I ever yet saw, I will not leave
the Church of England as by law established, while the breath of God is
in my nostrils." '
Such was Wesley's manifesto in 1789 ; in reality, a defence
of a thing he had often condemned, — Methodist service in
church hours.
While Wesley was thus attacked in the public press, he met
with the greatest respect and attention from several persons
of distinguished rank in Dublin and its environs ; the Earl of
Moira among the number. " They seemed," says Mr. Myles,
" to think it a blessing to have him beneath their roof" ^
Many of them flocked to hear him, on Good Friday, when he
preached, morning and evening, in the elegant chapel of his
old clerical dissenting friend, the Rev. Edward Smyth.
^Wesley's Works, vol. xiii., p. 254.
^ Methodist Magazhic, 1831, p. 298.
Rebellions. 573
Neither grand people, however, nor grand chapels, were at all 17^9
prized by Wesley, except as they furnished opportunities of Age 86
Christian usefulness. " At both times on Good Friday," says
he, " we had a brilliant congregation, among whom were
honourable and right honourable persons ; but I felt they
were all given into my hands ; for God was in the midst.
What a mercy it is, what a marvellous condescension in God,
to provide such places as Bethesda, and Lady Huntingdon's
chapels, for these delicate hearers, who could not bear sound
doctrine if it were not set off with these pretty trifles ! "
Dublin was not the only place which, at this time, gave
Wesley trouble. The Dewsbury circuit was entirely wrested
by his traitorous book steward ; and now, the same rebellion
against giving Wesley, and (after his death) Wesley's con-
ference, the sole power to appoint preachers, was showing itself
at Shields. Hence the following, addressed to the three
itinerant preachers stationed in the Newcastle circuit.
" Dublin, Apr/t i r, 1 789.
" I require you three, Peter Mill, Joseph Thompson, and John Stamp,
without consulting or regarding any person whatever, to require a positive
answer of Edward Coats, within three weeks after the receipt of this,
'Will you, or will you not, settle the house at Milburn Place, North
Shields, on the Methodist plan?' If he will not do it within another
week, I farther require that none of you preach in that house, unless you
will renounce all connection with your affectionate brother,
'•John Wesley.
" I am at a point. I will be trifled with no longer." *
Was this more hasty than wise } John Pawson seemed to
think so. The following is taken from one of his unpublished
letters, to Charles Atmore, dated " Leeds, May 9, 1789."
"What a pity it is that Mr. Wesley will pursue these violent measures!
If he goes thus, there will be divisions upon divisions among us. Mr.
Hanby informs me, that, at North and South Shields, and at Alnwick,
they refuse to settle their houses upon the conference plan ; and, at
Newcastle, they have been talking of building a chapel for the
Rev. Mr. CoUins, and of inviting some of the best preachers to settle
among them, and make a circuit by themselves, I suppose Mr. Sagar
would tell you, they had strange commotions among them when he was
there."
1 Methodist Magazi)ie, 1845, P- "7-
574 Zz/^ and Times of Wesley.
1789 But even this was not all. In 1785, Wesley ordained John
Age 86 Pawson and Thomas Hanby for Scotland ; where, for two
years, they had administered the sacraments, and had
preached in gown and bands. In 1787, as already stated, he
brought them back to England, commanded them to doff
their canonicals, and, being in England, to discontinue their
sacramental services. This, to Pawson, was exceedingly
annoying ; but he hardly had the pluck of Hanby in resisting
it. Hanby and Joseph Taylor, (who had also been ordained,
and was in the same dubious position,) were now stationed in
the Nottingham circuit ; and many of the Methodists, aware
of their ordination, naturally wished them to administer to
them the Christian ordinances ; but this Wesley imperiously
prohibited. Taylor yielded; Hanby persisted. The follow-
ing extracts, from two of his unprinted letters, will be read
with interest. The first was addressed to James Oddie ; the
second to Richard Rodda.
" Grantham, May 21, 1789.
" My very dear Brother, — I have been in deep waters on account
of my administering the Lord's supper, which I think it my duty to do,
especially to those who, for conscience sake, cannot go to church. Mr.
Wesley ordered me to desist. I told him, if I did, I should sin, because
I was persuaded it was my duty. Then he instructed the London clergy
and preachers to take me in hand. I have received their letter, and have
replied, that I must still do as I have done ; and that, if Mr. Wesley has
given me up into their hands, they must act according to their own
judgment ; for what I was now doing was from a Divine conviction of
my duty. Thus the matter rests. F"or some time, I have expected
another preacher to take my place ; but, as he has not come, perhaps,
they will refer the matter to conference. Mr. Wesley has ordered Joseph
Taylor, (who opposes me all he can,) to remove the leaders who have
promoted the sacraments ; if he does so, I expect there will be a division.
" See, my brother, my situation. I am much afraid of myself, lest I
should defile my conscience by yielding to the importunity of the
preachers. I am of all others the most improper person to make a stand
in defence of Christ's precious and most neglected ordinance. However,
hitherto, through infinite mercy, I have been firm and immovable ; and
our solemnities are much owned of God ; and I have much employment
in the sacred service. I meet with great opposition from the high church
bigots; but yet there are many, who will stand by me, let the consequence
be what it will.
" Let me hear from you soon ; and advise your very affectionate friend
and brother,
" Thomas Hanby."
Original Letters, by Thomas Handy. 575
" Plumtree, June 4, 1789. 1789
** My dear Friend, — O yes ! my sin is not to be forgiven unless I Age~86
repent, which I cannot do. That is too late, because I cannot seek it
with tears. Mr. Wesley has declared, that he will exclude the preachers
who administer the Lord's supper in England. For some time, I have
expected to be unshipped ; but whether hands are scarce, or I am to be
permitted to finish my voyage, which will be the last week in July, I
cannot tell.
" I came under no such obligations to Mr. Wesley, not to administer in
England. If this prohibition had been laid upon me, I hope I should
have refused his offer of nothitig. I am in the fire, but, like the sala-
mander, I live there. I am up to the chin in deep waters ; but not
drowned. Mr. Mather sent me a threatening bull ; Mr. Wesley a second ;
and, to complete the work, the clergy in London, Mr. Rankin and Mr.
Moore, joined their artillery. The last in command is my colleague,
Joseph Taylor, who opposes me with the utmost warmth. You will
readily conclude, ' Poor Hanby will be overpowered by numbers.' True ;
but I still keep the field, for all that, and mean to die there. I am single
handed, for my brethren, who promised to support me, have deserted to
the strongest party, not an unusual case. I grant, that those who are
called to preach have an equal right to administer; but do not talk of
' depreciating ordination.' Mr. Wesley did that, seven years ago, when he
published in the newspapers those who had presumed to be ordained by
the Greek bishop. I expect, he will depreciate me, though he himself
ordained me, and commanded me to administer the ordinances in the
church of God.
" When the great opposition against the sacraments was formed, Mr.
Taylor had administered once ; and I had promised to do so in two other
places; and when my engagements were fulfilled, I proposed to desist
from proceeding further, (as he had done,) for I saw there was no
withstanding so formidable a body. However, I was brought into deep
distress of mind, by the earnest request of the people, who had not
communicated for years, and who would not communicate with drinking,
whoring, swearing, and fighting parsons. The Lord let me see that His
ordinance was become obsolete, and that it was an unreasonable stretch
of power, in any human creature, to say, * If you will not communicate
with these wicked men, you shall not communicate at all.' This appeared
to me as an abrogation of Christ's commanded ordinance, for which no
one, either man or angel, had authority. I saw it was my duty to stand
forth in defence of this ordinance, and to sufter for it ; for suffer I am sure
to do. Mr. Wesley, for many years, has treated me contemptuously,
putting me beneath the weakest and most suspicious characters, (viz.
Briscoe and Fenwick,) and, therefore, I expect no favour in that quarter.
" I begin to look out for some poor cottage, to which I may retire, and
wait the opening of Providence. ' Vox popiili vox Dei,' is my motto ; and,
whatever others may say or think of me, I have no other motive but the
principle of Divine love. I can promise my sect neither riches nor
5 7^ Life and Tmies of Wesley.
1789 honour, by my opposition to the conference; but quite the reverse. To bo
^ "o, expelled the connexion, after thirty-five years of uninterrupted labour, is,
to me, a very painful thought; but I see I must suffer it; and shall only
take away with me this motto, * Driven from Methodism for defending the
injured, and nearly abrogated and obsolete, ordinance of Christ.' Farewell,
Mr. Wesley ! Farewell, Mr. Rodda ! Farewell, conference !
" I have written Mr. Wesley my reasons for acting in opposition to his
will, and my reasons why I must still act as I do ; but he has given me
no answer. Well, I am nothing. I only want to be the servant of God ;
and I see I must be His servant in His own way. If we may judge of
the propriety of our action, by His sacred presence, I can assure you
the tokens of that presence are wonderfully manifested in our assemblies.
"Many of the people in this circuit intend to apply again for the ordi-
nance ; and, perhaps, their petition will be treated with the same contempt
as their last was at Manchester.
" I am your very affectionate, and much obliged friend and brother,
"Thomas Hanby."
This was a painful state of things ; Dewsbury, Shields,
Nottingham, and DubHn, in rebelUon ; and now Thomas
Hanby, ordained by Wesley, and one of his best preachers,
in danger of expulsion, for doing what he deemed to be his
duty. Fortunately, this unbending minister was saved ; and
became the elected president of the fourth conference that was
held after Wesley's death. On Christmas day, in 1796, he
preached thrice in Nottingham, and met four or five classes
for the renewal of their quarterly tickets. This was his last
labour of love. Four days aftervv^ards, he died, saying : " I
am departing ; but I have fought a good fight." ^
Wesley left Dublin, on his preaching tour through the Irish
provinces, on the 13th of April, and returned on the 19th of
June. In this nine weeks' journey he preached about a
hundred sermons, in more than sixty diliferent towns and
villages, at least a dozen times in the open air, half-a-dozen
times in churches, and once in a place which, he says, was
" large, but not elegant — a cow house."
During a part of the time, he was seriously unwell, being
attacked with a complaint which was new to him, diabetes.
He wrote to London for the advice of Dr. Whitehead, and,
though the disease abated under the doctor's treatment, he
suffered from it, more or less, to the time of his decease.^
' Atmore's "Methodist Memorial."
* Moore's Life of Wesley, vol. ii., p. 379.
An Ij'ish Dinner. 577
" I was delighted," says Mr. Alexander Knox, " to find his 1789
cheerfulness in no respect abated. It was too obvious that Age86
his bodily frame was sinking ; but his spirit was as alert as
ever ; and he was little less the life of the company he hap-
pened to be in, than he had been three-and-twenty years
before, when I first knew him. Such unclouded sunshine of
the breast, in the deepest winter of age, and on the felt verge
of eternity, bespoke a mind whose recollections were as
unsullied as its present sensations were serene."
In illustration of Mr. Knox's testimony, an anecdote may
be added. At this time, Mr. (afterwards the Rev.) Joseph
Burgess was quartermaster of a regiment of soldiers in Sligo
barracks, and had the honour of entertaining Wesley as his
guest. A large party of friends were assembled to meet the
venerable visitor at dinner ; and, while the meal was in
progress, he suddenly laid down his knife and fork, clasped
his hands, and lifted up his eyes, as in the attitude of praise
and prayer. In an instant, feasting was suspended, and all
the guests were silent. Wesley then gave out, and sang with
great animation,
" And can we forget,
In tasting our meat,
The angelical food which ere long we shall eat ;
When enrolled with the blest,
In glory we rest,
And for ever sit down at the heavenly feast ?"
The happy old man, so near to the gates of heaven, then
quietly resumed his knife and fork ; and all felt that this
beautiful spontaneous episode, in the midst of an Irish
dinner, had done them good.^
Wesley spent three weeks more in Dublin and its vicinity.
He visited the classes, which contained above a thousand
members, after he had excluded about a hundred. He also
held his Irish conference, at which, of the sixty preachers
then employed in the sister island, between forty and fifty
were present. He writes :
" I found such a body of men as I hardly believed could have been
found together in Ireland; men of so sound experience, so deep piety,
^Methodist Magazine, 1840, p. 543.
VOL. Ill P P
57^ Life and Times of Wesley.
1789 and so strong understanding. I am convinced, they are no way inferioi
. 'or to the Enghsh conference, except it be in number. I never saw such a
number of preachers before, so unanimous in all points, particularly as to
leaving the Church, which none of them had the least thought of. It is
no wonder, that there has been this year so large an increase of the
society."
On the conference Sunday, Wesley and his preachers, and
a large number of the Dublin Methodists, attended the service
in St. Patrick's. "The dean," says he, "preached a serious,
useful sermon ; and we had such a company of communicants
as, I suppose, had scarce been seen there together, for above
a hundred years."
On his birthday he wrote :
"June 28. — This day I enter on my eighty-sixth year.' I now find, I
grow old: (i) My sight is decayed; so that I cannot read a small print,
unless in a strong light. (2) My strength is decayed ; so that I walk much
slower than I did some years since. (3) My memory of names, whether
of persons or places, is decayed ; till I stop a little to recollect them.
What I should be afraid of, is, if I took thought for the morrow, that my
body should weigh down my mind ; and create either stubbornness, by the
decrease of my understanding, or peevishness, by the increase of bodily
infirmities : but Thou shalt answer for me, O Lord my God."
At length, on July 12, Wesley bid adieu to the shores of
Ireland, for ever. It was a touching scene. Multitudes
followed him to the ship. Before he went on board, he read
a hymn ; and the crowd, as far as emotion would let them,
joined the sainted patriarch in singing. He then dropped
upon his knees, and asked God to bless them, their families,
the Church, and Ireland. Shaking of hands followed ; many
wept most profusely ; and not a few fell on the old man's
neck and kissed him. He stepped on deck ; the vessel moved;
and then, with his hands still lifted up in prayer, the winds
of heaven wafted him from an island which he dearly loved ;
and the warm hearted Irish Methodists "saw his face no
more. ^
Before proceeding with Wesley's history, another selection
from his letters may be welcome. The first was addressed to
a man who deserves a passjng notice.
' It ought to have been eighty-seventh.
* "Anecdotes of the Wesleys," p. 312.
Walter Chm^chey. 579
Walter Churchey was an enthusiastic Welshman ; a lawyer 1789
with a large family and a slender purse ; a good, earnest, Age 86
conceited old Methodist, who, unfortunately for his wife and
children, had more delight in writing poetry than he had
employment in preparing briefs. He was one of Wesley's
correspondents as early as 1771 •} exchanged letters with
Wesley's brother Charles ; was an acquaintance of the saintly
Fletcher ; and an intimate friend of Joseph Benson and Dr.
Coke. He claimed the honour, which belonged to others, of
having first suggested to Wesley the publishing of his
Arniinian Magazine \^ and, in a manuscript letter before us,
states that he it was who originated the scheme for reducinsr
what he calls " the national debt " of Methodism in the year
1800. He was a good man, though perhaps flighty, very
diligent but very poor, a warm admirer of Methodist
doctrine, but withal a millenarian, who wrote, in the letter just
mentioned : " I have lost my friend, Wesley ; but I shall see
him again, perhaps soon, even upon earth, where the sriffcrers
for Christ are to rise to reign in His spiritual kingdom on
earth a thousand years. I grow daily a greater Brotherite." ^
In 1786, Churchey wished to enrich the world with his
poetical productions; and, among others, consulted Wesley
and the poet Cowper. The latter, in reply, remarked : " I find
your versification smooth, your language correct and forcible,
and especially in your translation of the Art of Printing. But
you ask me, would I advise you to publish .-' I would advise
every man to publish, whose subjects are well chosen, whose
sentiments are just, and who can afford to be a loser, if that
should happen, by his publication."*
Thus encouraged, the sanguine Welshrqan set to work ;
Wesley helped him in obtaining subscribers ; the poems were
published ; the reviewers were revilers ; and poor Churchey
was poorer than ever.
The following letters, among others, were addressed to this
' Wesley's Works, vol. xii., p. 404.
"^ Methodist Magazine, 1823, p. 13 ^.
3 A reference to Richard Brothers, the prophecy expounder of that
period.
■• Cowper's W^orks, Bohn's edit., vol. iii., p. 370.
580 Life aiid Times of Wesley.
1789 worthy, but needy man. The first and second have not before
Age 86 been published.
"'Lo^no^, February 11, 1789.
" AlY DEAR Brother,— On Monday, March 2, I hope to be in Bath
or Bristol, and then we may talk about the number of copies. I have been
much more concerned than you, for these sixty years, in printing books,
both with and without subscription ; and I still think, with all our skill
and industry, we shall be hard set to procure three hundred subscribers.
Perhaps three hundred mdiy promise; but we must never imagine that all
who promise will perform. But of this we may talk more, when we meet
at Bristol.
" I suppose every one that loves King George loves Mr. Pitt. Peace
be with all your spirits !
" I am your affectionate brother,
"John Wesley."
" Clones, iT/izy 25, 1789.
" My dear Brother,— I am afraid of delay. I doubt, I shall
not be able to be as good as our word, although, in the last pro-
posals, I have protracted the time of dehvery till the ist of , August.
As you are not a stripling, I wonder you have not yet learnt the difference
heiwQcn promise and performance. I allow, at least, five-and-twenty per
cent ; and, from this conviction, I say to each of my subscribers (what,
indeed, j^;/ cannot say so decently \.o yours), ' Sir, down with your money.'
" I know Dr. Ogilvie well. He is a lovely man and an excellent poet.
I commend you for inoculating the children. I beheve the hand of God
is in our present work : therefore, it must prosper. Indeed, I love sister
Churchey, and am your affectionate friend and brother,
"John Wesley."
The following, besides referring to Churchey's poems, is
possessed of interest as containing an allusion to the prayer-
book published in 178S ; and also Wesley's final testimony
concerning the great philanthropist, John Howard, who died
seven months afterwards.
"Dublin, yuue 20, 1789.
"My dear Brother, — Michael is an original. He tells lies
innumerable, many of them plausible enough. But many talk full as
plausibly as he ; and they that can believe him, may.
" I do not doubt, but some part of your verse, as well as prose, will reach
the hearts of some of the rich.
" Dr. Coke made two or three little alterations in the prayer-book
without my knowledge. I took particular care throughout, to alter
nothing merely for altering's sake. In religion, I am for as few inno-
vations as possible ; I love the old wine best. And if it were only on
this account, I prefer 'if/iie/i' before 'w/io art in heaven.'
A Session of Methodist ''Eldei'sy 581
. - - — - • - -
"Mr. Howard is really an extraordinary man. God has raised him up 1789
to be a blessing to many nations. I do not doubt, but there has been — -
something more than natural in his preservation hitherto, and should not "^^
wonder if the providence of God should hereafter be still more conspi-
cuous in his favour.
" About three weeks hence, I expect to embark for England. Peace be
with you and yours !
" 1 am your affectionate brother,
"John Wesley.'
While in Ireland, Wesley was troubled with the affairs of
Scotland. Two years before this, John Pawson, eager to
exercise his newly acquired episcopal or presbyterian power,
— ^whichever the reader has a mind to call it, — began, in
Glasgow, a species of Methodism, which was not Wesley's,
but his own. He ordained seven elders, who were to meet
weekly, and to have the supervision of the temporal and
spiritual affairs of the Glasgow Methodists. In a book,
Pawson wrote the rules, which were to regulate their conduct.
Among others, one regulation was, that no person should be
admitted into the society, or be expelled from it, but by a
majority of these ordained elders ; for, though the itinerant
preacher might preside at their meetings, he was not allowed
to vote. No doubt, honest but simple Pawson expected
good and great results. The elders, however, like Pawson,
had no notion of being invested with ecclesiastical office
without using it ; and, hence, all sorts of paltry cases were
got up, apparently for the purpose of enabling the newly
fledged elders to show their skill in settling them. One
must suffice, as a specimen. Thomas Tassey, the most
vigilant and active of the official seven, alleged that Peggy
had become a lodger with Peggy , and had com-
mitted theft ; and that, as the time for the administration of
the sacrament was approaching, the charge against Peggy
ought to be judicially examined. Accordingly, a
sessions was appointed. The elders, the accuser, the
accused, and the witnesses were present. Beside these, there
were also the two circuit preachers, Jonathan Crowther and
Joseph Cownley, whom Crowther justly designates " two
poor ciphers," seeing, though they might preside, they had
' Wesley's Works, vol. xii., p. 409.
582 Life and Times of Wesley,
17S9 no power to vote. The charge was, that when Peggy
Age 86 ^vent to lodge with Peggy , the latter Peggy bought half
an ounce of tea, and a farthing's worth of oil ; that these
household provisions did not last so long as usual ; and that
the probability was, that the property of Peggy had, to
some extent, been feloniously appropriated by her lodger,
Peggy • The affair was so serious, and withal so
solemnly conducted, that it became needful to adjourn. At
the second sessions, Crowther (who, though not allowed to
vote, had a right to examine witnesses), asked the Peggy
whose property was in question, how often she had made
herself tea out of the half ounce, part of which had been
stolen. Peggy dolorously answered, " Only seven times."
She was then examined respecting her farthing s worth of oil ;
and it was ascertained, that, though it had not lasted as long
as usual, she had been using a ne%v feather in applying it ; and
it was thought that the 7iew feather might have absorbed the
quantity which Peggy, the lodger, was accused of stealing.
So the matter ended. Jonathan Crowther was disgusted,
and told Pawson's ordained elders, that their discipline resem-
bled the wisdom of Solomon, for it took cognisance of every-
thing, from the hyssop on the wall to the cedars of mount
Lebanon. The system had been instituted by Pawson, one
of Wesley's confidential friends, and a preacher of seventeen
years' standing. Crowther was young and inexperienced,
only in the fifth year of his itinerant life ; but he was
gifted with common sense, and saw that, if this ordained
machinery was continued, Methodism must be ruined.
Wesley had been in Scotland twelve months before ; but,
strangely enough, appears to have been kept in ignorance
of the new court at Glasgow. At all events, Jonathan
Crowther now wrote to him ; and received the following
decisive answer.
"Cork, May 10, 1789.
"My dear Brother, — 'Sessions'! 'elders'! We Methodists have
no such custom, neither any of the churches of God that are under our
care. I require you, Jonathan Crowther, immediately to dissolve that
session (so called) at Glasgow. Discharge them from meeting any more.
And if they will leave the society, let them leave it. We acknowledge
only preachers, stewards, and leaders among us, over which the assistant
in each circuit presides. You ought to have kept to the Methodist plan
Disturbance at Dubli7i, 583
from the beginning. Who had my authority to vary from it? If the 1789
people of Glasgow, or any other place, are weary of us, we will leave them • „„ 05
to themselves. But we are willing to be still their servants, for Christ's
sake, according to our own discipline, but no other.
"John Wesley." 1
Before accompanying Wesley on his way back to England,
we insert another letter, which is abridged in Wesley's col-
lected works. Adam Clarke was in the isle of Jersey ; but
Wesley wished him to remove to Dublin, on account of the
disturbed state of the society in that city. His old friend,
the Rev. Edward Smyth, was now one of his bitter enemies.
Hence the following.
. "Near Dublin, June 25, 1789.
" Dear Adam, — You send me good news with regard to the islands.
Who can hurt us, if God is on our side ? Trials may come, but they are
all good. I have not been so tried for many years. Every week and almost
every day, I am bespattered in the public papers, either by Mr. Smyth, or
by Mr. Mann, his curate. Smooth, but bitter as wormwood, are their words ;
and five or six of our richest members have left the society, because (they
say) ' I have left the Church.' Many are in tears on account of it ; and
many are terribly frightened, and crying out, ' Oh ! what will the end be?'
What will it be ? Why, ' Glory to God in the highest, peace on earth,
and goodwill among men.'
" But, meantime, what is to be done ? What will be the most effectual
means to stem this furious torrent ? I have just visited the classes, and
find still in the society upwards of a thousand members ; and, among
these, many as deep Christians as any I have met with in Europe. But
who is able to watch over them, that they may not be moved from their
steadfastness ? I know none more proper than Adam Clarke and his
wife. Indeed, it may seem hard for them to go into a strange land again.
Well, you may come to me at Leeds, at the latter end of next month ; and
if you can show me any that are more proper, I will send them in your
stead.2 That God may be glorified, is all that is desired by, dear Adam,
" Your affectionate friend and brother,
"John Wesley." ^
It has been already stated, that Wesley embarked for
England on July I3. William Myles was with him, and says:
*' We had a pleasant passage ; Mr. Wesley preached, and we
sang hymns most of the way." * The passage lasted about
six-and-thirty hours.
* Crowther's manuscript autobiography.
2 Thomas Rutherford was sent in this emergency.
3 Wesley a 11 Times, June 11, 1866.
'^Methodist Magazine^ I797> P- 3'3'
5S4 Life and Times of Wesley.
17S9 After holding services at Chester and Northwich, Wesley
Age 86 made his way to Manchester, where he and Coke administered
the sacrament to about twelve hundred communicants. At
Dewsbury, where John Atlay had taken both the Methodists
and their chapel, Wesley preached out of doors, in a drench-
ing rain. He then proceeded to Leeds for the purpose of
holding his annual conference ; and, on the day before it
began its sessions, preached from what would be a good
conference text at the present time : " O Timothy, keep that
which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain
babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called."
As usual, Wesley, besides conducting the business of the
conference, preached every day during its sittings ; and his
texts throughout were equally well timed, namely : " Train
up a child in the way he should go ; and when he is old he
will not depart from it." " We through the Spirit wait for
the hope of righteousness by faith." " Woe unto the world
because of offences ! for it must needs be that offences come ;
but woe to that man by whom the offence cometh." "To the
weak became I as weak, that I might gain the weak ; I am
made all things to all men, that I might by all means save
some." " Well, Master, Thou hast said the truth ; for there is
one God ; and there is none other but He." *T have a message
from God unto thee." " If any man speak, let him speak as
the oracles of God." ^ Here was a word in season for every
one. Rare was the treat to attend a conference like this. On
the conference Sunday, Wesley seems to have devolved the
preaching upon others ; but the day was not an idle one. He
writes : " with the assistance of three other clergymen, I
administered the sacrament to fifteen or sixteen hundred
persons." When and where are such sacramental services
held at present .''
What may be called the conference sermon was preached
by a local preacher, perhaps the only instance of the kind in
Methodism's history. James Hamilton, M.D., was the
preacher ; his text, " Trust ye not in lying words, saying, the
temple of the Lord, the temple of the Lord, the temple
of the Lord, are these." His sermon was printed, and was
' Methodist Magasine, 1845, P- ^ 'S-
A Conference Sermon. 585
sold "at the Rev. Mr. Wesley's preaching houses in town 17S9
and country," with the following title : " A Sermon preached Age86
at Leeds, July 29, 1789, before the Methodist Preachers,
assembled in Conference, and a large body of the people in
connection with them ; and now published at the request of
many of the Hearers."
This also was a sermon for the times, and evidently had
Wesley's approbation. Its gist may be gathered from a fev/
brief extracts.
After dwelling on the functions of the priests and scribes
of the Jewish church, the preacher said :
" But as all external religion is of no use, any farther than as it advances
the spiritual kingdom of Christ in the soul ; and as the Jews too often
lost sight of this, resting in their types and ceremonies, God called a race
of men, named prophets, who had nothing to do with the priesthood ;
men full of the Holy Ghost ; and sent them to declare that all external
religion is nothing worth, when it fails to produce purity of heart. The
prophets were, (with two or three exceptions,) what we call laymen, — taken
from the common occupations in Judaea, chiefly farmers and shepherds, —
holy men, men of strong faith, their hearts overflowing with zeal for the
honour of God, — men of invincible courage, practising the strictest tempe-
rance, and clothed in the plainest manner."
Dr. Hamilton then proceeded to argue, that Methodist
preachers bore some analogy to these special messengers of
God in ancient times ; and after an affectionate allusion to
the two Wesleys, and to Whitefield, continued:
"And here mark the Divine wisdom. Although their brother priests
in the Church thrust them from them, and although their names were
cast out as evil above the names of all men, they ever retained a
strong and affectionate attachment to the men who had thus abused
them, and to the Church of which they were members ; and this has
been, in the overruling hand of God, the great means of carrying on
that glorious spiritual work which we now behold. Had it not been for
this attachment, the Methodists would have, long ere this, become a dis-
tinct body, separate from the Church and all others ; and, I fear, in con-
sequence thereof, would have sunk into the dead formality of the numerous
sects, with which the world is harassed and divided."
Then proceeding to address the assembled conference, the
preacher added :
" Will ye bear with me, ye spiritual messengers of the Lord, while I
presume to say a few words \.q> you ? See with what a holy calling ye are
called ; for what a glorious and important end God has raised you up !
5 86 Life a7id Times of Wesley.
1 789 Even to set spiritual religion before the eyes of all men ; to cry to men of
' all opinions, sects, and parties, 'Trust not unto lying words, saying. The
'^ temple of the Lord are these' ; to bring them, from resting in external
duties, to the possession of internal holiness ; from an opinion in the head,
to the love of God in the heart. Let then the dead bury their dead ! Let
the formalist and the pharisee, the church bigot and the sectary, contend
for ways of thinking, gestures in worship, and modes of church govern-
ment ; but may ye never forget, that ye are sent for a nobler end ; that
your commission is the same as Paul's, not to baptize, but to preach the
gospel. Although I am neither a prophet, nor the son of a prophet ; yet
forgive me when I express my fears, that, if ever the Methodists leave
their several churches ; if ever ye set up as a separate people by external
distinctions and creeds ; if ye substitute a silken gown and sash for rough
garments and a leathern girdle, and call one another, Rabbi ! Rabbi ! then
the glory will depart from you, and God will raise up another people. He
will call other lay preachers, no matter by what name ; and He will send
them to call yoii from opinions and forms, and to sound in your ears,
' Trust not unto lying words, saying, The temple of the Lord, the temple of
the Lord, the temple of the Lord are these. ' "
Hamilton's sermon, to say the least, was ingenious ; and re-
ferring as it does to the great topic of the day, separation from
the Church, these extracts will not be regarded as out of place.
Wesley says, there were about a hundred preachers present '
at the conference ; Atmore says, about a hundred and thirty;^
be that as it may, one hundred and fifteen of them signed a
declaration, that they entirely approved of Methodist chapels
being settled on the conference plan ; and, among these, were
several who, soon after, distinguished themselves as Methodist
reformers, namely, William Thorn, Henry Taylor, and
Alexander Kilham.
The principal subjects discussed arc thus referred to in
Wesley's journal.
"July 28 — The case of separation from the Church was largely con-
sidered, and we were all unanimous against it. August i — We considered
the case of Dewsbury house, which the self elected trustees have robbed us
of. The point they contended for was this, — that they should have a right
of rejecting any preachers they disapproved of. But this, we say, would
destroy itinerancy. So they chose John Atlay for a preacher, who adopted
Wilham Eels for his curate. Nothing remained but to build another
preaching house, towards which we subscribed ^206 on the spot." ^
Besides these, some other points were decided ; namely,
* Methodist Magazine, 1845, ?• I'S-
Conference of 17S9. 587
that the preachers should read the rules of the society in 1789
every society once a quarter ; that no person should be Age 86
admitted to lovefeasts without a society ticket, or a note
from the assistant ; that every watchnight should be con-
tinued till midnight ; that the collections at lovefeasts should
be most conscientiously given to the poor ; that preachers
should not go out to supper, and should be home before nine
at night ; that preachers' children should dress exactly
according to the band rules ; that only one preacher should
come in future to the conference from Scotland, except those
that were to be admitted into full connexion ; and that no
books should be published without Wesley's sanction, and
that those approved by him should be printed at his press in
London, and be sold by his book steward.
We give these legislative enactments as we find them. The
last bore hardly on strong minded writers, like Thomas
Taylor and Joseph Benson.
The day after the conference concluded, Wesley set out for
London, and thence, for the last time, to Cornwall. His first
day's journey was seventy miles, and his second eighty, and
to this amount of labour was added preaching. One day in
London was devoted to business ; on the next, which was
Sunday, the patriarchal preacher delivered two sermons in
the chapel in City Road, set out at seven o'clock, p.m.,
travelled all night, and reached Bristol about noon on
Monday. Without delay, he hurried on to Plymouth, preach-
ing at Taunton, Collumpton, and Exeter. At Plymouth
there had been, what he calls, a "senseless quarrel"; but he
administered the sacrament to six hundred people, and
preached to an enormous congregation out of doors.
Arriving at St. Austell, he says : " I knew not where to
preach, the street being so dirty, and the preaching house so
small. At length, we determined to squeeze as many as we
could into the preaching house ; and truly God was there."
At Truro, the street, leading to the chapel, being blocked up
with starving tinners demanding an increase to their wages,
and a troop of soldiers who were keeping peace, Wesley was
obliged to preach " under the coinage hall." Forty years had
elapsed since he was last at Falmouth, and then he was
" taken prisoner by an immense mob, gaping and roaring
588 Life and Times of Wesley.
1789 like lions ; now high and low lined the street, from one end
A(T^6 of ^^ town to the other, out of stark love and kindness"; and
he preached to the largest congregation he had ever seen in
Cornwall, except in or near Redruth. The same sort of scenes
awaited him at Helstone, St. Just, Newlyn, and Penzance.
In Gwennap pit his congregation was calculated at five-and-
twenty thousand. This remarkable spot was first used by
Wesley, as a place for preaching, in 1762, on account of the
wind being so boisterous as to prevent him occupying his
usual stand in the town itself. " At a small distance," says
he, " was a hollow capable of containing many thousand
people. I stood on one side of this amphitheatre, toward the
top, with the people beneath, and on all sides." Many since
then had been the marvellous scenes he had witnessed in this
" the finest natural amphitheatre in the kingdom." There
can be little doubt, that the estimated numbers were some-
times greater than the real ; but still, it was here, on this
Cornish common, that Wesley had the largest congregations
to whom he ever preached. The place is now one of the
"sights" of Cornwall. Here an annual service has been
held ever since Wesley's death ; and now, on every Whit-
monday, thousands wend their way, in every style of convey-
ance, from the donkey cart of the poor peasant to the dashing
carriage of the wealthy squire, and assembling within the
area and around the banks of this consecrated hollow, join in
one vast act of worship, offered to the God of heaven. Here
we have Methodism's yearly pilgrimage, made by hosts of
Cornish Methodists, not to honour man, but to commemorate
the mercies of their fathers' God, and to ask His help and
blessing on behalf of themselves and their posterity.
Eleven days were spent in Cornwall, during which Wesley
preached, at least, seventeen times, nine of which were in the
open air. "There is," says he, "a fair prospect in Cornwall,
from Launceston to the Land's End."
On his way back, we find him preaching at Tavistock,
Plymouth, Exeter, Tiverton, Halberton, Taunton, Castle
Carey, Ditcheat, and Shepton Mallet, eleven sermons, in
seven days, besides the travelling from Cornwall to Bristol.
No wonder that the venerable traveller sometimes started at
three o'clock in the morning !
" The lovely Family at Bal/iamy 589
Bristol was the centre of Wesley's labours from September 17S9
5 to October 5. On one of the Sundays, he preached twice ^^^6
in his own chapel, and once in Temple church ; but writes :
" It was full as much as I could do. I doubt I must not
hereafter attempt to preach more than twice a day."
On October 5, he started from Bristol at four o'clock in
the morning, for London. Arriving in town, he wrote :
" I am now as well, by the good providence of God, as I am likely to
be while I live. My sight is so decayed, that I cannot well read by
candlelight ; but I can write as well as ever ; and my strength is much
lessened, so that I cannot easily preach above tv;ice a day. I5ut, I bless
God, my memory is not much decayed; and my understanding is as clear
as it has been these fifty years."
Having spent five days in London, he set out for Norfolk.
The remainder of the year was employed, as usual, partly in
London, and partly in his long accustomed preaching tours
to the surrounding counties. On the last Sunday in the
year, he occupied the pulpit of St. Luke's, his parish church.
" The tables are turned," says he; "I have now more invita-
tions to preach in churches than I can accept of."
One of his London retreats was, what he calls, " the lovely
family at Balham." This was, doubtless, the family of
George Wolff, Esq., one of his executors, — a merchant, and
also consul general to the court of Denmark, — a gentleman
of unassuming manners, deeply pious, and one of the most
liberal of the metropolitan Methodists, — for many years the
confidential friend of Wesley, and who died at Balham, in
1828, at the age of ninety-two.^
Before concluding the year, we insert a further selection
from Wesley's letters.
The first was to his nephew, Samuel Wesley, the musical
genius, now twenty-three years of age, and is strikingly
characteristic of the venerable writer.
" Near Bristol, September 16, 17S9.
" My dear Sammy, — It gives me pleasure to hear, that you have so
much resolution, that you go to bed at ten, and rise at four o'clock. Let
not the increase of cold affright you from your purposes. Bear your cross,
and it will bear you. I advise you carefully to read over Kcmpis, the Life
> Methodist Magazine, 1828, p. 286.
Age 86
590 Life and Times of Wesley.
1789 of Gregory Lopez, and that of Mons. de Renty. They are all among my
brother's books.
" I am, dear Sammy, your affectionate uncle and friend,
"John Wesley."'
The next beautifully illustrates the benevolence of Wesley,
and the faithfulness of his friendship. Mr. Salmon, at the
time referred to, was not a member of the Methodist society,
but only an occasional hearer; and, yet, the instance of his
liberality, which Wesley mentions, was not the only one
which does honour to his character. In 1762, Wesley opened
a new chapel at Shepton Mallet, with a mudden floor ; and,
in this state, it was occupied for years, when Mr. Salmon
gave the stewards £\o to improve the floor, and to supply
back rails to the benches.^ Richard Rodda, to whom the
following was addressed, now filled the office of assistant
at Manchester.
" Wallingford, October -li,, 1789.
" My dear Brother, — You are a man whom I can trust : whatever
)-ou do, you will do it with your might. Some years since, we wanted a
preaching place near Coleford, in Somersetshire. A neighbouring gentle-
man, Mr. Salmon, gave us ground to build on, and timber for the house,
and desired me to use his house as my own. He is now by wicked men
reduced to want.
" I am informed, a master for a poorhouse is wanted at Manchester.
Pray inquire, and, if it be so, leave no means untried to procure the place
for him. Apply, in my name, to B. Barlow, D. Yates, T. Phillips, Dr.
Easton, Mr. Brocklchurst, Stonehouse, and all that have a regard for me.
Make all the interest you can. Leave no stone unturned. 'Join hands
with God to make a good man live.' I hope you will send me word in
London, that you have exerted yourself, and are not without a prospect of
success.
" I am, dear Richard, your affectionate friend and brother,
"John Wesley." ^
The following letter is now, for the first time, published.
The Liverpool Methodists were about to build their Mount
Pleasant chapel. An expenditure of i^i lOO startled Wesley.
What would he have said to the expenditure of as many
thousands ? And yet Liverpool Methodism docs the one now
^ Wesley Banner, 1851, p. 405.
' Methodist Magazine, 1827, p. 285.
^ Wesley's Works, vol. xii., p. 478.
Mount Pleasant Chapel, Liverpool. 591
with as much nonchalance as it did the other then. The letter 17S9
was addressed to Mr. Lawrence Frost. Age 86
" London, October 23, 1789.
"My dear Brother,— You are bold people ! Two hundred pounds,
purchase money, besides nine hundred pounds ! But I do not use to
damp any good design. Go on in the name of God. It is true, your
deed is clumsy enough. I am surprised, that no Methodist will take my
advice. I have more experience, in these things, than any attorney in the
land. And have I not the Methodist interest as much at heart ? Oh,
why will you alter the beautiful deed we have already .'' why will you
employ any attorney at all ? Only to seek a knot in a bulrush ; only to
puzzle the cause. Well, comfort yourself. You will not long be troubled
with
" Your affectionate brother,
"John Wesley."
The next, which was written to William Black, in Nova
Scotia, is interesting as containing a reference to Wesley's
labours, and his professed adherence to the Church.
" London, November 2t, 1789.
" My dear Brother,— Your letter has given me great satisfaction.
My fears are vanished away. I am persuaded, brother Wray, Stretton,
and you, will go on hand in hand, and that each of you will take an equal
share in the common labour. I do so myself. I labour now just as I did
twenty or forty years ago. By all means, proceed by common consent,
and think not of separating from the Church of England. I am more and
more confirmed in the judgment which our whole conference passed on
that head, in the year 1758.
" I am your affectionate friend and brother,
"John Wesley."'
Thirty-two years before, Wesley preached his first and last
sermon in Bideford. For long it had been a barren soil, but,
in 1788, was made a circuit town ; and now simple minded,
sanctified Samuel Bardsley was labouring with great success.
'T am glad," says Wesley to this godly man, "to hear so good
an account of the work of God at Bideford. It had held out
long, and seemed to bid defiance to the gospel."^ Bardsley
was all aloqe ; and Michael Fenwick, fond of meddling, wrote
to him : "Dear Sammy, — Write a pressing letter every post,
imtil Mr. Wesley sends you another preacher. It is cruel to
' Black's Memoirs, p. 251.
2 Wesley's Works, vol. xii., p. 472
592 Life and Times of Wesley.
let you be all alone in that great wide circuit ; and I will tell
Mr. Wesley so. I am glad, that Col. Buck is the reigning
mayor with you. Pray, when you see him, give my Christian
respects to him, and tell him, I am glad he is raised to be the
first magistrate in Bideford." Fenwick was without an
appointment, and was resident at Hexham. Wesley took
him at his word, and sent him to Bideford. Poor Michael
seems to have been a stormy petrel. No sooner was he come,
than there was serious trouble. Hence the following.
'■'■December 25, 1789.
" Most esteemed Friend,— Yesterday, I waited upon the lord
lieutenant for this county, Lord Fortescue, and we spent an hour together
in a close, pointed conversation, respecting the hot persecution at Bideford.
His lordship told me, he will go over and inquire into matters, for he
thinks our hves are in danger, seeing that the mayor of Bideford and the
other justices have thrown open the flood gates to the mob, to do with us
as they please. I recommended to his lordship the 23rd of Matthew,
(only changing the word Jerusalem into that of Bideford,) in which our
blessed Lord describes the men. His lordship is greatly alarmed at our
present situation; but, the next week, he will be with his majesty, and
will let him know of our treatment ; and they must take the consequences.
My dear brother, never fear : only believe ; and we shall see great things
in due time. I shall conquer, or die in the field.
" I am your affectionate friend,
"Michael Fenwick."i
The above not only furnishes a glimpse of Methodist affairs
at Bideford, but casts light on the following letters, which
Wesley sent to Bardslcy.
" Northampton, November 25, 1789.
"Dear Sammy,— Yours of the 21st instant was sent to me hither.
You have done exceeding well to take the upper room. If need be, we
will help you out. Let us have no law, if it be possible to avoid it : that
is the last and worst remedy. Try every other remedy first. It is a good
providence, that the mayor of Bideford is a friendly man. Prayer will
avail much in all cases. Encourage our poor people to be instant in
prayer. Take care of poor Michael; and do not forget,
" Dear Sammy, your affectionate brother,
"John Wesley."^
"Newcastle under Lyne, March 29, 1790.
" Dear Sammy,— Take particular care, that neither Michael Fen-
wick, nor any other, give any just offence ; and especially, that they
Manuscript letter. ^ Methodist Magazine, 1825, p. 675.
MetJiodisni in the Isle of Man. 59;
offend not God ; then He will make your enemies to be at peace with 1780
you. —
" If I remember well, I did write to the mayor of Bidcford ; and I ^^^ ^^
expect, that makes him more quiet. By meekness, gentleness, and
patience, with faith and prayer, you will prevail at Torrington also. You
have only to go on calmly and steadily, and God will arise and maintain
His own cause. Only let us labour to have a conscience void of offence
toward God, and toward man.
" I am, dear Sammy, your affectionate friend and brother,
"John Wesley." »
All must admire this advice. During this year of storm
and tempest, the Bideford Methodists increased from eighty-
three to one hundred and forty.
We insert one more letter. In the Isle of Man there
were 2569 Methodists, within five hundred of the number
there are at present. Then there was one circuit ; now
there are four : then there were three itinerant preachers ;
now there are ten. George Holder was assistant ; and to
him Wesley addressed the following.
"Near London, November 29, 1789,
"Dear George, — You did well to remember the case of Dewsbury
house, and to send what you could to Mr. Mather.
" I exceedingly disapprove of publishing anything in the Manx language.
On the contrary, we should do everything in our power to abolish it from
the earth, and persuade every member of our society to learn and talk
English. This would be much hindered by providing them with hymns
in their own language. Therefore, gently and quietly let the proposal
drop.
" I hope you and your fellow labourers are of one heart. Peace be
with your spirits !
" I am, dear George, your affectionate friend and brother,
"John Wesley." 2
Wesley would take no step to gratify the linguistic folly of
the Manx Methodists ; but he was still actively employed in
supplying books to his English readers. His publications,
in 1789, were :
1. "The Life of Mr. Silas Told." i8mo, 113 pages.
2. "A Short Account of the Life and Death of Jane
Newland, of Dublin." i2mo, 12 pages.
3. " An Extract of the Rev. Mr. John Wesley's Journal,
HVesley's Works, vol. xii., p. 473. ^ Ibid. vol. xiii., p. 108.
VOL. in. Q Q
594 Life and Times of Wesley.
1789 from September 4, 1782, to June 28, 1786." l2mo, 134
A^Tse pages.
4. " Minutes of Several Conversations between the Rev.
Mr. Wesley and others. From the year 1744, to the year
1789." i2mo, 51 pages.
5. His chief pubHcation, of course, was his Arminian
Magazine, 8vo, 679 pages.
As usual, it contains six of his own sermons. Those on
Man, Faith, and the Omnipresence of God, are among the
ablest he ever wrote. That on the Rich Man and Lazarus
is a powerful exposition of the text, which Wesley believed
to be, not merely a parable, but a history. The sermon on
Riches is boldly faithful, and must have made the rich
Methodists of that period wince and tremble ; as, indeed, it
ought to make such Methodists wince and tremble at the
present day. The following, addressed to rich men, are the
concluding paragraphs.
" O how pitiable is your condition ! And who is able to help you ?
You need more plain dealing than any men in the world ; and you meet
with less. For how few dare to speak as plain X^o yon, as they would to
one of your servants ? No man living that either hopes to gain anything
by your favour, or fears to lose anything by your displeasure. Oh that God
would give me acceptable words, and cause them to sink deep into your
hearts ! Many of you have known me long, well-nigh from your infancy !
You have frequently helped me, when I stood in need. May I not say,
you loved me ? But now the time of our parting is at hand ; my feet are
just stumbling upon the dark mountains. I would leave one word with
you, before I go hence ; and you may remember it when 1 am no more
seen.
" O let your heart be whole with God ! Seek your happiness in Him,
and Him alone. Beware, that you cleave not to the dust ! This earth is
not your place. See that you use this world as not abusing it ; use the
world, and enjoy God. Sit as loose to all things here below, as if you
were a poor beggar. Be a good steward of the manifold gifts of God ;
that, when you are called to give an account of your stewardship, He may
say, * Well done, good and faithful servant ; enter thou into the joy of thy
Lord.'"
Nothing can be plainer than that, for several of the last
years of his life, Wesley regarded the growing riches of
the Methodists as one of their greatest dangers. His
magazines, to say nothing of his letters and his journals, are
full of this. Hence, his eighteen lengthy extracts on the
Wesley warning rich AletJiodists. 595
Surest Way of Thriving-, running through the whole of the ^7^9
magazine of 1788, and part of that for 1789. Hence, the A^86
solemn warning, contained in his brief article on "The Origin
of Image Worship among Christians"; an article meriting the
serious thought of those wealthy Methodists, who are
adorning (?) their chapels with painted windows and emblem-
atic pulpits. Citations might be multiplied, all tending to
show that, rightly or wrongly, Wesley regarded the growth of
riches among Christians, not as a good to be desired, but as
a necessary evil, and a serious danger.
The only sermon, which remains unnoticed, is that on
God's Vineyard, — a sermon on the doctrine, spiritual helps,
discipline, and outward protection of Methodism. He tells
us that, notwithstanding the assistance they received from
Peter Bohler, he and the other Oxford Methodists " were
never clearly convinced, that we are justified by faith alone,
till they carefully consulted the homilies of the Church of
England, and compared them with the sacred writings,
particularly St. Paul's epistle to the Romans." He pro-
pounds the principle, which Dr. James Hamilton enlarged
upon in his conference sermon, already mentioned, that
for the Methodists to have become a separate sect, like
the Moravians, "would have been a direct contradiction to
the whole design of God in raising them up, to spread
scriptural religion throughout the land, among people of every
denomination, leaving every one to hold his own opinions,
and to follow his own mode of worship." Having shown the
great advantages that the Methodists had enjoyed, his early
hopes concerning them, and how these hopes had hardly been
realised, he concludes with the following address to the rich
members of the society,
" O ye that have riches in possession, once more hear the word of the
Lord ! Ye that are rich in this world, that have food to eat, and raiment
to put on, and something over ! Are you clear of the curse ? of loving
the world? Are you sensible of your danger.? Do you feel, * How
hardly will they that have riches enter into the kingdom of heaven'?
Do you continue unburnt in the midst of fire .-* Are you untouched with
the love of the world ? Are you clear from the desire of the flesh, the
desire of the eye, and the pride of life .'' Do you //// a knife to your throat
when you sit down to meat, lest your table should be a snare to you ?
Is not your belly your god? Is not eating and drinking, or any other
Age 86
596 Life and Times of Wesley.
1789 pleasure of sense, the greatest pleasure you enjoy? Do not you seek
happiness in dress, furniture, pictures, gardens ; or anything else that
pleases the eye? Do not you grow soft and delicate? unable to bear
cold, heat, the wind or the rain, as you did when you were poor ? Are you
not increasing in goods, laying up treasures on earth ; instead of restoring to
God, in the poor, not so much or so much, but all that you can spare !
Surely ' it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a
rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven !'"
There are other contributions by Wesley, in the Magazine
for 1789, Avhich ought to have attention. There is an ex-
quisitely drawn up article on " The Nature of Inspiration,
clearly explained and enforced, as applicable to the Old
and New Testament " ; and also his piece " On the Manners
of the Times"; neither of which has been included in Wesley's
collected works. And there are also his " Thoughts on Sepa-
ration from the Church," and his "Thoughts upon a late
Phenomenon;" both of them really on the same subject.
After showing how revivals of religion have generally ended
in the formation of separate sects, and thereby rarely lasted,
according to Luther's dictum, " longer than a generation, that
is, thirty years," Wesley remarks :
"The Methodists have been solicited again and again, to separate from
the Established Church, and to form themselves into a distinct body,
independent of all other religious societies. Thirty years ago, this was
seriously considered among them, at a general conference. All the
arguments, urged on one side and the other, were considered at large ; and
it was determined, without one dissenting voice, that they ' ought not to
separate from the Church.'
" This is a new thing in the world ; this is the peculiar glory of the
people called Methodists. In spite of all manner of temptations, they
■will not separate from the Church, What many so earnestly covet, they
abhor ; they will not be a distinct body. Now what instance have we of
this before, either in ancient or modern history, of a body of people, in
such circumstances, who will not be a distinct party, but choose to remain
in connection with their own church, that they may be more effectually
the servants of all ? This, I say again, is an utterly new phenomenon ! I
never saw, heard, or read of anything like it. The Methodists will not
separate from the Church, although continually reproached for doing it ;
although it would free them from abundance of inconveniences, and make
their path much smoother and easier ; and although many of their friends
earnestly advise, and their enemies provoke them to it, — the clergy in
particular ; most of whom, far from thanking them for continuing in the
Church, use all the means in their power, fair and unfair, to drive them out
of it."
1790.
WESLEY'S career is drawing to a close. He himself 1790
was on the " Delectable mountains," basking in the Age 87
sheen of the celestial city ; but all around him, or rather
beneath him, was darkness and confusion. The riots of 1789
were about to culminate in the indescribable horrors of the
French revolution. Burke wrote against this terrible up-
heaving ; Dr. Price applauded it. English newspapers, all at
once, became Galilean and republican ; and overflowed wnth
abuse of the old constitution, — abuse of the Church, — abuse of
the aristocracy, — abuse of almost everything except the
French insurrection, and the men who made it. Thomas
Paine and his friends were in the highest feather ; and infidel
and revolutionary pamphlets were published with prodigal
profusion. Even Fox, in parliament, declared that the French
army, by refusing to obey the court and to act against the
people, had set a glorious example to all the armies of
Europe ; to which Burke, who had hitherto been Fox's friend,
replied, that the revolutionists were " an irrational, unprin-
cipled, proscribing, confiscating, plundering, ferocious, bloody,
tyrannical democracy." It W'as amid such excitement, that
Wesley spent his last days on earth.
He began the year in London, and wrote in his journal :
" 1790, January I. — I am now an old man, decayed from head to foot :
my e)es are dim ; my right hand shakes much ; my mouth is hot and
dry every morning ; I have ahngering fever almost every day ; my motion
is weak and. slow. However, blessed be God, I do not slack my labour ;
I can preach and write still."
Henry Moore observes :
" Being in the house with him when he wrote thus, I was greatly
surprised. I knew it must be as he said ; but I could not imagine his
weakness was so great. He still rose at his usual hour, four o'clock, and
went through the many duties of the day, not indeed with the same
apparent vigour, but without complaint, and with a degree of resolution
that was astonishing." '
* Life of Wesley, vol. ii., p. 380.
59S Life and Times of Wesley.
1790 On Saturday, January 2, he preached at Snowsfields. The
Age 87 next day, Sunday, he held the covenant service in the City
Road chapel, at which nearly two thousand persons were
present. A few days were then devoted to writing letters,
two of which we give. The first has not before been
published. It was addressed to Daniel Jackson, then ap-
pointed to the Stockport circuit.
" London, yamiary 2, 1 790.
" My dear Brother, — It is no wonder many of the societies should
be in a poor condition, considering what poor care has lately been taken
of them. They will soon find the difference.
" The books that are damaged you may give away as you judge
proper.
"None ought to have made a collection for any place before the house at
Dewsbury was built. However, do what you can, and you do enough.
*' I am, with love to sister Jackson,
" Your affectionate friend and brother,
"J. Wesley."
The next was written to John Mason, the assistant in the
St. Austell circuit.
" Near London, Jamiary 13, 1790.
" My dear Brother, — As long as I live, the people shall have no
share in choosing either stewards or leaders among the Methodists.
We have not, and never had, any such custom. We are no republicans,
and never intend to be. It would be better for those, that are so minded,
to go quietly away. I have been uniform, both in doctrine and discipline,
for above these fifty years ; and it is a little too late for me to turn into a
new path, now I am old and grey headed. Neither good old brother
Porna (God bless him !) expects it from me, nor brother Wood, nor brother
Flamank.
" If you and I shall be called hence this year, we may bless God that
we have not lived in vain. Come, let us have a few more strokes at
Satan's kingdom, and then we shall depart in peace !
" I am, your affectionate friend and brother,
"John Wesley." '
On Sunday, January 17, Wesley buried Mrs. Dornford, a
good woman ; and preached her funeral sermon. In the
afternoon, he preached to a large congregation, in the church
of Great St. Helen's.
On Monday, January 25, he went to Dorking, "and
^ Methodist Magazine, 1S30, p- 251.
Wesley starts on a Five Months yonrncy. 599
laboured to awaken a harmless, honest, drowsy people, who, ^79°
for many years, seemed to stand stock still, neither increasing Age 87
nor decreasing."
On January 29, Wesley writes : " We held our general
quarterly meeting, whereby it appeared, that the society
received and expended about ;^3000 a year ; but our expense
still exceeds our income."
The next eight days were employed in meeting the London
classes, containing about 2500 members.
During the month of February, we find him preaching a
funeral sermon for Robert Windsor ; and sermons to children
• — beautiful sights — at West Street, and at City Road. He
retired to his friend Mr. Wolff's, at Balham, " to finish his
sermons, and to put all his little things in order." He
"submitted to importunity, and once more sat for his picture."
He " dined at Mr. Baker's, one of the sheriffs of London ; a
plain man, who still lived in an inn yard!"
On Sunday, February 28, which, for five months, was his
last day in London, he preached to enormous congregations,
at City Road, West Street, and Brentford ; and then started
off on his long journey to the north. Before we follow him,
two short letters may be welcome ; the first to Adam Clarke
at Bristol, the second to ]\Iiss Bisson in the Channel islands.
" London, /^f<5;v/«; J 11, 1790.
"Dear Adam, — On Monday, IMarch i, I hope to set out hence; and
to preach that evening, and on Tuesday, at half-past si.K o'clock, at Bath.
On Thursday, if he desires it, I will dine at Mr. Durbin's; and, on
Monday following, begin as usual to meet the classes. I am not at all
sorry that James Gore is removed from this evil world. You and I shall
follow him in due time; as soon as our work is done. Many of our
friends have been lately gathered into the garner, as ripe shocks of wheat
Peace be with both your spirits ! I am, dear Adam, etc.,
"John Wesley." 1
"London, February 13, 1790.
" My dear Sister, — I love to see your name at the bottom of a letter,
especially when it brings me the good news, that your spirit is still
rejoicing in God your Saviour. My sight is so far decayed, that I cannot
well read a small print by candlelight ; but I can write almost as vvell as
ever I could ; and it does me no harm, but rather good, to preach once or
twice a day, A few days since, I had a letter from one of our sisters in
^ Dunn's Life of Clarke, p. 72.
Age 8;
600 Life and Times of Wesley.
1790 Scotland, whose experience agrees much with yours; only she goes
farther; she speaks of being 'taken up into heaven, surrounded with the
blessed Trinity, and let into God the Father.' I commend you to His
care ; and am, etc,
"John Wesley."
Wesley spent a fortnight at Bath, Bristol, and Kingswood ;
preached daily ; visited the sick ; and met the Bristol classes.
On one of the Sundays, at least, he preached thrice ; having
on the night previous occupied the pulpit of his friend, the
Rev. Joseph Easterbrook, in Temple church. He writes :
"Mr. Easterbrook has lately been very ill ; but God has again
lifted up his head to be a father to the poor a little longer."
This indefatigable clergyman was the son of the Bristol
bellman ; was educated at Kingswood school ; became assist-
ant master at Trevecca college ; obtained ordination ; was
presented to Temple church by the Bristol corporation ; and
succeeded James Roquet as chaplain of Newgate prison.^
Fletcher, in writing to the Countess of Huntingdon concern-
ing him, says, when he first entered Trevecca, he began to
live upon water and potatoes ; and yet, besides attending to
his scholastic duties, he preached every evening in the week,
and occasionally as many as four times on Sundays. Atmore
states that, in Bristol, it was Easterbrook's invariable rule to
send those, who were awakened under his ministry, to meet
in class among the Methodists. His work was now nearly
ended. When Wesley came again to Bristol, in September,
he wrote: "Mr. Easterbrook is ill of a disorder which no
physician understands, and which it seems God alone can
cure. He is a pattern to all Bristol, and indeed to all in
England ; having, besides his other incessant labours, which
were never intermitted, preached in every house in his
parish!" Within four months after this, Easterbrook was
dead, and Henry Moore preached for him a funeral sermon,
which was printed. He died on the 21st of January, 1791, in
the fortieth year of his age, some of his last words being
" God does all things well. I have no fear of death or of
judgment." ^
^ Wesley's Works, vol. xiii., p. 105.
' Pawson's manuscripts, ^ Moore's sermon.
A Three Months Preachincr Plan. 60 r
While at Bristol, Wesley addressed the following character- i79<^
istic letter, not before published, to Jasper Winscomb, one of Age 87
his preachers in the Isle of Wight. What would Wesley have
said concerning the circuit divisions of the present day ?
"Bristol, March 13, 1790.
" Dear Jasper, — The story of Thomas Whitvvood is very remarkable,
and the story is well told, and God has done much honour to him by the
happy effects which have been consequent on his death. I am in no haste
at all concerning building, without having paid some more of our debts.
I am likewise in no haste to multiply preachers, or to divide circuits.
Most of our circuits are too small rather than too large. I wish we had
no circuit with fewer than three preachers on it, or less than four hundred
miles' riding in four weeks. Certainly, no circuit shall be divided before
conference. If we do not take care we shall all degenerate into milksops.
' Soldiers of Christ, arise ! '
" I am, dear Jasper, etc.,
" John Wesley,"
On leaving London, the following circular, bearing Wesley's
signature, was issued, indicating to his friends the places he
meant to visit, in his journey to the north. It furnishes a
bird's eye view of the Herculean labours of an old man nearly
eighty-seven years of age, and also helps to fill up a gap in
Wesley's journal. It must be remembered, that the means of
transit in 1790 were not what they are at present ; and that,
at every place mentioned, Wesley preached at least once,
and often several times more than that. It will also be seen,
that from three to four days were employed in some of the
principal societies, where he arranged to spend his Sundays.
"London', March i, 1790.
" As many persons desire to know where I am from this time till the
conference, I here set down my route, which, if God permit, I shall keep
till that time.
March.
Monday, 15, Stroud; 16, Gloucester; 17, Worcester; 18, Stourport;
19, Birmingham.
Monday, 22, Wednesbury; 23, Dudley and Wolverhampton; 24,
Madele/; 25, Salop; 26, Madeley; 27, Newcastle under Lyne;
28, Lane End and Burslem.
Monday, 29, Congleton; 30, Macclesfield.
April.
Thursday, I, Stockport; 2, Manchester.
Monday, 5, Nantwich and Liverpool; 7, Warrington and Chester;
9, Wigan; 10, Bolton.
6o2 Life and Tinics of Wesley.
1790 Monday, 12, Blackburn; 13, Colne; 17, Keighlcy; 18, Haworth and
— Halifax.
^^ ' Tuesday, 20, Huddersfield; 21, Dewsbury; 24, Wakefield; 25,
Birstal and Leeds.
Tuesday, 27, Bradford; 29, Otley.
May.
Saturday, I, Parkgate; 2, York; 4, Pocklington; 6, Newcastle.
Monday, 10, Alnwick; 12, Dunbar; 13, Edinburgh.
Tuesday, 18, Dundee; 19, Arbroath; 20, Aberdeen.
"N.B. I have not yet finally settled the rest of my plan. I probably
shall, if I come to York. Many persons are continually teasing me to
visit more places. Now let them judge whether I have not work enough.
"John Wesley."
To this circular, two postscripts were added, by some other
hand, namely :
" Those persons, who have occasion to write to Mr. Wesley, are
requested to direct their letters according to this plan, and not to
London."
"Our friends here earnestly desire that Mr. Wesley may be remembered
in prayer, especially at the next quarterly fast, that his strength may be
continued, and, if it please God, increased also."
Such was Wesley's plan of travel and of labour for the
next ten weeks ; but even this was a mere outline; and it will
be found, as we follow him, that he preached at many places
besides the above mentioned.
At Stroud, on March 15, hundreds were unable to get into
the chapel. On the day following-, he preached to two other
crowds, at Painswick, and at Gloucester, March 17, the
chapel at Tewkesbury was not large enough to hold the
noonday congregation; and at Worcester, in the evening, he
"found much comfort among a well established people."
Twenty years before this, Stourport did not exist ; now
there were a couple of streets, at least, and also a prosperous
trade. In 1780, John Cowell came with his family from
Wolverhampton ; and, soon after, Thomas Hanby preached
the first Methodist sermon, in an upper room, at Mr. Morris's.^
A chapel was soon erected, towards which Mr. Cowell was a
large contributor. The chapel was to be occupied by both
Calvinist and Arminian preachers. The Arminians were
> Methodist Magazine, 1832, p. 594.
JlIci/iodis??i at Stoiwport. 60
•>
speedily ejected ; and, rather than appeal to law, Mr. Cowcll, 179°
at his own expense, built another and a larger chapel, which Age 87
Wesley opened in 1788. He now visited them again ; had a
crowded congregation ; was pleased with their attention ; but
writes : " The moment I ceased speaking, fourscore or one
hundred begun talking all at once, I do not remember to
have been present at such a scene before. This must be
amended ; otherwise, if I should live, I will see Stourport no
more."
March 19, at eleven a.m., Wesley preached at Ouinton ;
and, at night, to a densely packed congregation at Birming-
ham. Next day, Saturday, the same scene was repeated ;
and, on Sunday, when he opened a new meeting-house, and
preached twice, hundreds of people were unable to get in.
Joseph Benson, at this time stationed in Birmingham, met
Wesley at Stourport, and writes : " I found him much
stronger and better than I expected. Still his sight is so
defective, that he is much at a loss in giving out hymns, in
reading his text, and in referring to any portion of Scripture.
In conversation, he seemed much as usual, lively and enter-
taining."^
On Monday, March 22, at Wednesbury, as many as could
squeezed into the chapel, and the rest were fain to be listeners
outside. The next day, he opened a new meeting-house,
"one of the neatest in England," at Dudley; and, at night,
preached at Wolverhampton. Three days were spent at
Madeley and Salop ; one sermon was written ; and four w'ere
preached. Week' day though it was, Madeley church was
crowded ; and so also was the meeting place at Salop ; but
concerning the Salopians, Wesley writes : " I was much
ashamed for them. The moment I had done speaking, I
suppose fifty of them were talking all at once ; and no
wonder they had neither sense nor good manners, for they
were gentlefolks ! "
The halt at Madeley gave him the opportunity, not only
to write his sermon on the wedding garment, but to write
letters to his friends. To Adam Clarke he expresses the
opinion, that "animal magnetism is diabolical from the
' Benson's Life, by ]\IacdonalJ, p. 209.
6o4 Life and Times of Wesley.
1790 beginning to the end ;" he also advises him to consult Dr.
Age87 Whitehead about his health, and requests him to follow all
the doctor's directions, " except the leaving off preaching " ;
naively adding, " I think, if I had taken this advice many
years since, I should not have been a living man/'^
Charles Atmore had recently commenced a Sunday-school,
in the Orphan House, at Newcastle, consisting of seventy
teachers and more than a thousand children.^ And Michael
Longridge, one of Wesley's best local preachers, in the north
of England, had published a l2mo pamphlet of 13 pages,
• entitled, " Sunday-schools Recommended as a Religious
Institution : with a Plan for their Extension at a small
Expense." All this had Wesley's cordial approval ; and,
hence, the following letter to Atmore, which, besides a refer-
ence to the Sunday-schools, also contains an addition to
Wesley's preaching plan.
" Madeley, March 24, 1790.
"Dear Charles, — I am glad you have set up Sunday-schools in
Newcastle, It is one of the noblest institutions which has been seen in
Europe for some centuries, and will increase more and more, provided
the teachers and inspectors do their duties. Nothing can prevent the
increase of this blessed work, but the neglect of the instruments. There-
fore, be sure to watch over these with all care, that they may not grow
weary in well doing.
" I shall be at Darlington, if God permit, on Tuesday and Wednesday,
May 4th and 5th; on Thursday, at Durham to preach at twelve o'clock at
noon ; and at Newcastle between four and five in the afternoon, Grace
be with you and yours !
" I am, dear Charles, etc.,
"John Wesley," ^
To return. According to announcement, Wesley, on
Saturday, March 27, preached at Newcastle under Lyne ;
and, on the day following, twice, to large crowds, in the open
air, at Lane End, and at Burslem. At nine o'clock on
Monday morning, he opened Tunstall new chapel, "the most
elegant he had seen since he left Bath"; and, at night,
preached at Congleton, the clergyman of the parish, " the
mayor, and all the heads of the town," forming a part of his
* Dunn's Life of Clarke, pp, 72, 73,
2 Methodist Magazine, 1845, p. 119.
3 Wesley's Works, vol, xiii., p. 113.
An 2uipiiblishcd Letter. 605
congregation. He quietly remarks: "That I might not 179°
overshoot them, I preached on, ' So teach us to number our Age 87
days that we may apply our hearts unto wisdom.' "
Two days were spent at Macclesfield, and two crowded
audiences were addressed. Here, also, one of his horses died.
On April i, he had a large congregation at Stockport. The
next day. Good Friday, he preached at Oldham and Man-
chester ; a-nd, at the latter place, again on Saturday.
On Easter Sunday, at Manchester, he preached twice, and
held a sacramental service at which there were about sixteen
hundred communicants !
Next day, he preached thrice, at Altrincham, Northwich,
and Chester ; and, in each place, had crowded congregations.
At Warrington, " the chapel was well filled with serious
hearers" ; and, at Liverpool, multitudes were not able to get
in. At Wigan, the chapel " was more than filled"; and "in
the lovely house at Bolton " he preached to, what he calls,
" one of the loveliest congregations in England." This was
on April 10 ; and, from this date to May 24, there is a
chasm in Wesley's journal, which we shall endeavour to fill
up ; first of all, however, giving an unpublished letter, ad-
dressed to Thomas Taylor, who, with William Simpson, was
stationed at Hull.
"Manchester, April \, 1790.
" Dear Tommy, — I did not approve of Dr. Coke's making collections
either in yours or any other circuit. I told him so, and am not well
pleased with his doing it. It was very ill done. It is exceeding probable,
that sea bathing will be of use to brother Simpson, especially if he be
temperate in all things.
" I do not know what you mean concerning talking ' about the Church.'
I advise all our brethren, that have been brought up in the Church, to
continue there ; and there I leave the matter. The Methodists are to
spread life among all denominations ; which they will do, till they form a
separate sect.
" I am, dear Tommy, etc.,
"John Wesley."
According to Wesley's plan, the week, intervening between
April 10 and 17, was to be spent in visiting Blackburn,
Colne, Keighley, Haworth, and Halifax. But, besides these
places, he also preached at Preston, from Revelation xxii. 17 ;
6o6 Life and Times of Wesley.
1790 and was the guest of Mrs. Emmett of Walton,^ where he wrote
Age 87 the following letter to the celebrated Ann Cutler, commonly-
called "praying Nanny."
"Walton, April 15, 1790.
" My dear Sister, — There is something in the dealings of God with
your soul, which is out of the common way. But I have known several
whom He has been pleased to lead in exactly the same way, and parti-
cularly in manifesting to them distinctly the three Persons of the ever
blessed Trinity. You may tell all your experience to me any time ; but
will need to be cautious in speaking to others, for they would not under-
stand what you say. Go on in the name of God, and in the power of
His might. Pray for the whole spirit of humility ; and I wish that you
would write and speak without reserve to, dear Nanny,
" Yours affectionately,
"John Wesley."^
Wesley spent April 21 at Halifax;^ and, in connection
with his visit here, preached at Bradshaw, where, on his tot-
tering up the pulpit stairs, the whole congregation burst into
a flood of tears. More than once, his memory failed him, and
Joseph Bradford and William Thompson had to act the part
of remembrancers. The visit was memorable in more respects
than one. While the congregation was waiting for the
venerable preacher, and a crowd was assembled at the door,
a woman of the name of Wilson mockingly exclaimed,
"They are waiting for their God"; no sooner was the sentence
uttered than she fell senseless to the ground, and, the day
following, she expired.*
The next few days, according to Wesley's plan, were
employed at Huddersfield, Dewsbury, Wakefield, Birstal,
Leeds, Bradford, and Otley, On the 3rd of May, he came to
York. Thomas Taylor, in his unpublished diary, remarks :
" ]\Iay 3 — I went to York, and was amazed to meet such a
number of travelling preachers, fifteen or sixteen of them.
Mr. Wesley preached a useful sermon ; and, after preaching,
we had a meeting respecting one of our number who was
accused of drunkenness."
On the 5th of May, Wesley was met at Darlington by his
*" Methodism in Preston," p. 44. ^ Cutler's Life, p. 5.
^ Methodist Magazine, 1 792, p. 66.
*" Methodism in HaUfax," p. 181.
A Backslider Healed. 607
son in law, ]\Ir. William Smith, and by Charles Atmore, from 179°
Newcastle. Atmore writes : "We heard him preach in the Age 87
evening, from * He is before all things, and by Him all things
consist.' He appears very feeble ; and no wonder, he being
nearly eighty-seven years of age. His sight has failed so
much, that he cannot see to give out the hymn ; yet his
voice is strong, and his spirits remarkably lively. Surely this
great and good man is the prodigy of the present age."
Old as he was, Wesley set out next morning, at half-past
three o'clock, for Newcastle, where he preached, in the
evening, from Isaiah Ivii. 1,2. The following night (Friday)
he preached again his remarkable sermon to the children of
the Sunday-school, taking as his text Psalm xxxiv. 1 1 ;
the sermon being literally composed and delivered in words
of not more than two syllables.^ On Saturday, May 8,
we find him at North Shields, preaching, says Atmore,
" an excellent sermon, from * What things were gain to me,
these I counted loss for Christ.' " Next day, Sunday, May
9, he addressed a crowd of several thousands, on Byker Hill,
from Matthew vii. 24 ; and, in the evening, at the Orphan
House, took his old favourite text, " By grace are ye saved,
through faith." " The house," writes Atmore, " was much
crowded, and many hundreds returned, not being able to
obtain an entrance." Atmore continues :
" He was highly honoured in his ministry ; particularly to one who had
been in a state of great despair for many years. As soon as he arrived
at the Orphan House, Mr. Wesley inquired after this individual, and I
accompanied him in visiting him. As soon as he entered the room,
where the poor man was, he went up to him, and said, ' Brother Reed, I
have a word from God unto thee ; Jesus Christ maketh thee whole.' He
then knelt down to pray ; and such a season I have seldom experienced.
Hope instantly sprang up, and despair gave place; and, although Reed
had not been out of his habitation, nor even from his wretched bed, for
several years, he went that evening to hear Mr. Wesley preach ; and God
graciously confirmed the testimony of His servant in restoring him to 'the
light of His countenance.'"^
On Monday, May 10, Wesley proceeded on his journey to
Scotland. Of his labours during the next fortnight, we have
no record ; but, on May 25, we find him preaching to a
' See page 472 of this volume.
^Methodist Magazine, 1845, p. 121.
6o8 Life and Tiines of Wesley.
1790 crowded audience at Aberdeen ; then at Brechin, Glasgow,
Ape87 ^"*^ Dumfries. The last mentioned town was now a part of
the Glasgow circuit, and had, as its resident preacher, Mr.
Yewdall, who writes : " In the latter end of May, Mr. Wesley
visited us. He came from Glasgow that day, (about seventy
miles,) but his strength was almost exhausted, and, when he
attempted to preach, very few could hear him. His sight
was likwise much decayed, so that he could neither read the
hymn or text. The wheels of life were ready to stand still ;
but his conversation was agreeably edifying, being mixed
with the wisdom and gravity of a parent, and the artless
simplicity of a child." ^
From Dumfries, Wesley proceeded, on June 2, to Carlisle,
where the chapel would not near contain his congregation.
Thence he went to Hexham, where he "found a loving
people, much alive to God, and consequently increasing
daily."
On Friday, June 4, he once again, and, for the last time,
reached Newcastle. He writes :
" In this and Kingswood house, were I to do my own will, I should
choose to spend the short remainder of my days. But it cannot be ; this
is not my rest. This and the next evening, we had a numerous congrega-
tion; and the people seemed much alive. Sunday, June 6, I was invited
to preach in Lemsley church, on the side of Gateshead Fell; but, some
hours after, the minister changed his mind. So I preached in our own
preaching house, which contained the greater part of the congregation ;
among whom were Sir Henry Liddell and his lady, with a great number
of his servants. The chapel was hot as a stove ; but neither high nor
low seemed to regard it : for God was there ! The Orphan House was
equally crowded in the evening; but the rain would not suffer me to
preach abroad. Monday, June 7, I transcribed the stations of the
preachers. Tuesday, June 8, I wrote a form for settling the preaching
houses, without any superfluous words, which shall be used for the time
to come, verbatim, for all the houses to which I contribute anything. I
will no more encourage that villainous tautology of lawyers, which is the
scandal of our nation. In the evening, I preached to the children of our
Sunday-school; six or seven hundred of whom were present. Observe,
none of our masters or mistresses teach for pay : they seek a reward that
man cannot give."
Two days after this, Wesley left Newcastle, where he had
'^Methodist Magazine, 1795, p. 423.
Adam Clarke. 609
spent so many happy hours, for ever. Before we follow him, 1790
three more of his letters may be acceptable ; the first to Age~87
Henry Moore, the second to the wife of Adam Clarke, the
third to Miss Bisson.
"Dumfries, yune i, 1790.
"My dear Henry,— So I am upon the borders of England once
again. My sight is much as it was, but I doubt I shall not recover my
strength, till I use that noble medicine, preaching in the morning. But
where can we put poor Adam Clarke? He must not preach himself to
death. What circuit is he equal to ? Where can he have rest as well as
labour 1 The best place I can think of, at present, is Leeds.
" The dying words of the Prince of Orange are much upon my mind
this morning: ' Lord have mercy upon the people !' I never saw so much
likehhood of doing good in Scotland as there is now, if all our preachers
here would be Methodists indeed ! Tell dear Nancy to love me as well
as she can.
" I am, my dear Henry, etc.,
"J. Wesley."'
"Dumfries, June r, 1790.
" My dear Sister, — The great question is. What can be done for
Adam Clarke? Now, will you save his life? Look round; consider if
there be any circuit where he can have much rest, and httle work; or
shall he and you spend September in my rooms at Kingswood, on con-
dition that he shall preach but twice a week, and ride to the Hotwells
every day? I think he must do this, or die; and I do not want him
(neither do you) to run away from us in haste. You need not be told,
that this will be attended with some expense ; if it be, we can make it
easy. I am apt to think this will be the best way. In the meantime, let
him do as much as he can, and no more.
" It is probable, I shall stay with you a little longer, as my strength
does not much decline. I travelled yesterday nearly eighty miles, and
preached in the evening without any pain. The Lord does what pleases
Him. Peace be with all your spirits !
" I am, etc.,
"John Wesley." 2
" Newcastle, yi/nc 6, 1790.
" My dear Sister, — To hear from you is always a pleasure to me;
though it is a pleasure mixed with concern when I hear of your weakness
or sickness; only I know the Lord loveth whom He chasteneth. But of
what kind is your illness ? Perhaps I might be enabled to tell you how to
remove it ; and if you can recover your health, you ought ; for health is a
great blessing.
' Moore's Life, p. 89.
2 Wesley's Works, vol. xiii., p. 94.
VOL. in. R R
6 10 Life and Times of Wesley.
I 790 "In August last, my strength failed almost at once ; and my sight, in a
. g great measure, went from me. But all is well ; I can still write almost as
easily as ever ; and I can read in a clear light ; and, I think, if I could
not read or write at all, I could still say something for God. When you
have more strength, tell me more of the work of God, whether in yourself
or those round about you. And ought you not to let me know if you are
in any temporal distress .-* For everything that concerns you, concerns,
my dear Jenny, yours most affectionately,
"John Wesley."*
On leaving Newcastle, on the loth of June, Wesley pro-
ceeded, over rough roads and high hills, a distance of at least
thirty miles, to Weardale, where he preached both at noon
and night. On the nth, he preached twice in the open air,
at Stanhope and at Durham, the crowds being so immense
that the chapels were utterly unable to contain them. The
1 2th and 13th he spent at Sunderland, where he preached
thrice : once in the Methodist chapel ; a second time in
Monkwcarmouth church, for the benefit of the Sunday-
school ; and a third, to many thousands of people, out of
doors.
During the ensuing week, we find him preaching at
Hartlepool, Stockton, Yarm, Potto, Hutton Rudby, Stokes-
ley, and Whitby. At the last mentioned town, he spent
Sunday, June 20, preached twice, attended church, and wrote
in his journal : " It was very providential, that part of the
adjoining mountain fell down, and demolished our old
meeting-house, with many houses besides ; by which means
we have one of the most beautiful chapels in Great Britain,
finely situated on the steep side of the mountain. In all
England, I have not seen a more affectionate people than
thpse at Whitby."
This was high praise of these Yorkshire fishermen ; but it
was not unmerited. Warm hearts often beat under rough
exteriors. Besides, the Methodist society at Whitby was now
well-nigh a model. Most of the two hundred and fifty
members met in band. Their itinerant preachers preached
to them three mornings every week ; and, on the other
mornings, they were either supplied with local preachers, or
held prayer-meetings. At noon, every Friday, they had their
* Wesley's Works, vol. xiii., p. 105.
A Yorkshire Cavalcade. 6 1 1
intercession meeting; and, after the toils of the week were 179°
ended, they met together every Saturday night, to ask God Age 87
to fit their minds and hearts for the services of Sunday.^
On June 21, Wesley preached at Pickering and Malton ;
and, on the following days, at Scarborough, Bridlington,
Beverley, and Hull. At Hull, he spent Sunday, June 27,
and also his birthday. He writes :
" Friday, June 25 — About noon I preached at Beverley, to a serious,
well behaved congregation; and, in the evening, to one equally serious,
and far more numerous, at Hull. Saturday, 26, was a day of satisfaction.
I preached at seven in the morning, and at six in the evening, to as many
as our house would contain ; the ground being too wet for the congrega-
tion to stand abroad."
This is a simple entry, and gives no idea of the commotion
created by Wesley's visit. Thomas Taylor, who was now the
assistant in the Hull circuit, writes in his diary : " I and
many friends from Hull met INIr. Wesley at Beverley. We
dined at an inn. He preached, and we hastened to Hull.
Many people attending this evening." Taylor is as laconic
as Wesley ; but, from another source, we learn, that the
" many friends from Hull" were a regular cavalcade of forty
persons, some in chaises, and the rest on horses. All these
dined with W^esley at his inn at Beverley ; spirits w^ere lively,
and conversation brisk ; but, in the midst of it, and while all
present were utterly oblivious of the flight of time, W^esley
pulled out his watch, started on his feet, bid his friends good
day, stepped into his carriage, and was gone before they had
time to remonstrate, or to wish him to wait for the cavalcade to
attend him. Horses were saddled, and carriages got ready with
as much celerity as possible ; but the old man was on his
way, and it was with the utmost difficulty that " the horsemen
and the chariots " overtook the illustrious visitor in sufficient
time to do him honour in the sight of their fellow citizens.^
On his birthday, he wrote :
" Monday, June 28. — This day, I enter into my eighty-eighth year. For
above eighty-six years, I found none of the infirmities of old age ; my
eyes did not wax dim, neither was my natural strength abated ; but, last
' Kilham's Life, by Blackwell, p. 1 14.
^Methodist Magazine, 1836, p. 494.
6 12 Life and Times of Wesley.
1790 August, I found almost a sudden change. My eyes were so dim, that no
1 glasses would help me. My strength likewise now quite forsook me ; and
probably will not return in this world. But I feel no pain from head to
foot ; only it seems nature is exhausted ; and, humanly speaking, will
sink more and more, till ' the weary springs of life stand still at last.' "
Thus did the venerable man calmly contemplate the in-
evitable closing" of his remarkable career. No weary child of
innocence ever went to its welcome couch with greater
serenity than Wesley went down the steps leading to his
sepulchre.
Here we pause again, to insert another selection of his
letters. The first was addressed to William Black, in Nova
Scotia.
" Sunderland, June 14, 1790.
" My DEAR Brother, — You did well to send me an account of your
little societies. Here is a good beginning, though it is, as yet, in many
places,, a day of small things ; and although it does not please God to
carry on His work so rapidly with you as in the United States. But one
soul is worth all the merchandise in the world ; and, whoever gets money,
do you win souls.
" Never was there, throughout England, Scotland, and Ireland, so great
a thirst for the pure word of God as there is at this day. The same we
find in the little islands of Man, Wight, Jersey, Guernsey, and Alderney
in the Western Ocean. In the Isle of Man alone (thirty miles long) the
societies contain about four-and-twenty hundred members. I have just
now finished my route through Scotland, where I never had such congre-
gations before. So it pleases God to give me a little more to do, before
He calls me hence.
" What has become of brother Scurr, Dodson, and our other Yorkshire'
friends 1 Some of them doubtless are gone into a farther country ; but
some I suppose remain. I doubt you do not keep up a constant inter-
course with each other. Love as brethren !
" I am, dear William, etc.,
"John Wesley.'"
The following, kindly lent by Charles Reed, Esq., M.P., has
not before been published. It was addressed to William
Thom, the assistant appointed to Sarum circuit.
" Malton, June 21, 1790.
"My dear Brother, — I concur in the judgment of my brother, that
the using of the form of prayer will tend to unite our people to the Church,
rather than to separate them from it ; especially if you earnestly insist on
their going to church every fourth Sunday.
^ Black's Memoirs, p. 265.
Letter to a Bishop. 613
" I am very indifferent concerning the preaching house, and shall not 1790
concern myself about it any more. I have lost £,\o by it already, although • — -
to no purpose. If anything more is done concerning it, it must be done
by the people at Sarum themselves.
" I am, with love to sister Thorn, dear Billy, your affectionate friend and
brother, "J. WESLEY."
The next was addressed to a bishop, whose name is not
given.
" Hull, June 26, 1790.
" My Lord, — It may seem strange, that one, who is not acquainted with
your lordship, should trouble you with a letter. But I am constrained to
do it ; I beheve it is my duty both to God and your lordship. And I must
speak plain ; having nothing to hope or fear in this world, which I am on
the point of leaving.
" The Methodists, in general, my lord, are members of the Church of
England. They hold all her doctrines, attend her service, and partake of
her sacraments. They do not willingly do harm to any one, but do what
good they can to all. To encourage each other herein, they frequently
spend an hour together in prayer and mutual exhortation. Permit me
then to ask, ' Ctii bono ? for what reasonable end, would your lordship
drive these people out of the Church ?' Are they not as quiet, as inoffensive,
nay, as pious, as any of their neighbours ? except perhaps here and there
a hairbrained man, who knows not what he is about. Do you ask, ' Who
drives them out of the Church V Your lordship does ; and that in the
most cruel manner ; yea, and the most disingenuous manner. They desire
a licence to worship God after their own conscience. Your lordship
refuses it ; and then punishes them for not having a licence ! So your
lordship leaves them only this alternative, ' Leave the Church or starve.'
And is it a Christian, yea, a protestant bishop, that so persecutes his own
flock? I S2iy persecutes ; for it is persecution, to all intents and purposes.
You do not burn them, indeed, but you starve them ; and how small is the
difference ! And your lordship does this, under colour of a vile, execrable
law, not a whit better than that de hceretico coinburendo ! So persecution,
which is banished out of France, is again countenanced in England !
" O my lord, for God's sake, for Christ's sake, for pity's sake, suffer the
poor people to enjoy their religious, as well as civil liberty ! I am on the
brink of eternity ! Perhaps so is your lordship too ! How soon may you
also be called, to give an account of your stewardship, to the great
Shepherd and Bishop of our souls ! May He enable both you and me to
do it with joy ! So prays, my lord, your lordship's dutiful son and
servant,
"John Wesley," >
The following letter is without date, but is too character-
istic to be omitted.
* Moore's Life of Wesley, vol. ii., p. 384.
6 14 Life and Times of Wesley.
1790 "You give five reasons why the Rev. Mr. P will come no more among
Age 87
us. I. Because we despise the ministers of the Church of England. This
I flatly deny : I am answering letters, this very post, which bitterly blame
me for just the contrary. 2. Because so much backbiting and evil
speaking is suffered amongst our people. It is not suffered ; all possible
means are used, both to prevent and remove it. 3. Because I, who
have written so much against hoarding up money, have put out ;!^ 700 to
interest. I never put sixpence out to interest since I was born ; nor had
I ever ^100 together, my own, since I came into the world. 4. Because
our lay preachers have told many stories of my brother and me. If they
did, I am sorry for them ; when I hear the particulars, I can answer, and,
perhaps, make those ashamed who believed them. 5. Because we did not
help a friend in distress. We did help him as far as we were able. ' But we
might have made his case known to Mr. G., Lady H., etc' So we did,
more than once ; but we could not pull money from them, whether they
would or no. Therefore, these reasons are of no weight. You conclude
with praying, that God would remove pride and malice from amongst us.
Of pride, I have too much ; of malice, I have none ; however, the prayer
is good, and I thank you for it." '
The next was addressed to Adam Clarke, then at Bristol.
" June 28, 1 790.
" Dear Adam,— I often wonder at the people of Bristol. They are so
honest, yet so dull, 'tis scarce possible to strike any fire into them. Only
with God all things are possible. Many years ago, I put the society at
Bath into a way wherein, if they had persevered, they would now have owed
nothing. They were at Plymouth but thirty in number, and their debt
was ^1400. I advised them, let every member subscribe monthly what
he can ; and a hundred at the Dock promised to do the same. ' I,' said
one, 'will give a crown a month'; 'I,' said another, ' half-a-crown.'
Many subscribed a shilling, sixpence, or threepence a month. And now
the debt is paid. I began such a subscription in Bath ; as I have done in
many places with success. But they left it off in two or three weeks.
Why 1 Because I gave four guineas to prevent one, that was arrested,
from going to jail ! Good reason, was it not ? ' Why,' said one and
another, ' might he not have given it to vie ?'
" On Monday four weeks, I shall probably set out for Bristol. Peace
be with your spirits. u j ^^^ ^tc,
"John Wesley." '^
While on money matters, let an explanation be given.
Wesley asserts, in one of the foregoing letters, that he never
had, at one time, since he was born, ;^iOO that was his own.
1 Wesley's Works, vol. xiii., p. 139.
^ Dunn's Life of Clarke, p. 73.
Weskys Benefactions. 615
No doubt, excepting an occasional legacy, this was strictly i79°
true ; and yet, towards the close of life, a year never passed Age 87
without his giving hundreds of pounds away in charity.
Wesley not only kept a journal of his labours, but account
books of his income and expenditure. The last of these
has, at the end of it, the following entry, in Wesley's own
handwriting, but in penmanship which it is extremely difficult
to decipher :
" N.B. For upwards of eighty-six years,' I have kept my accounts
exactly. I will not attempt it any longer, being satisfied with the continual
conviction, that I save all I can, and give all I can, that is, all I have.
"John Wesley,
"7///K 16, 1790."
What was Wesley's income t lie had ^^"30 a year from
the London circuit f and, in the country, the Methodists
occasionally, but not often, paid his hostelry bill, and other
similar expenses incurred in travelling. But this was not
all. Wesley was the proprietor of a large publishing and
book concern, from which he derived considerable profits ;
but be the profits what they might, they were at once dis-
tributed in the work of God, and in acts of charity. In as
brief a form as possible, we give, from the book above
mentioned, a few items belonging to the last nine years of
Wesley's life.
In 1782, Wesley received £^^1 \<^s. Of this, he spent
^5 iQj-. for clothes. The balance, ;;^356, he, with his own
hands, gave away ; and, during the same year, John Atlay, his
book steward, by his directions, gave a further sum of ;^237 I3J-.;
making ;^593 13^". for the year.
In 1783, he, and his steward by his orders, gave ;^832 \s. 6d,
In 1784, ;^534 17s. 6d. In 1785, ^^851 12s. In 1786, ^^738 5^.
In 1787, including his travelling expenses, £c)6l 4s. In 1788,
the last year Atlay acted for him, the two united gave in
charity ^^^738 4^-.
At the end of his accounts for 1789, he writes :
' Ought it not to be sixty-eight.
2 An error occurred in the first edition of this volume, on page 224. It
was there stated, that Wesley received ^60 a year ; it ought to have been
_;^3o. According to the old circuit book, at City Road, it was the custom
to pay him ^^15 in the first quarter of each year, and ^^15 in the last.
6i6 Life and Times of Wesley.
^79° « I have given this year by myself ;^2o6 o o
Age 87 By George Whitfield^ 560 o o
Travelling 60 o o
" But I can be accurate no^ . , ' Not as / will, but as Thou wilt."'
No one can dispute that the profits of Wesley's book
estabhshment were as much his own property as the profits
of any of the great publishing houses in Paternoster Row ;
but, of these profits, he literally spent none upon himself,
except for an occasional suit of clothes. All were most
scrupulously given, as fast as they were realised, and some-
times faster, to the support and extension of the great work
to which his long life Avas cheerfully devoted, and to the
relief of the distresses of his fellow creatures as far as he
had the power. Dr. Whitehead says, it was supposed that,
in the course of fifty years, Wesley gave away between twenty
and thirty thousand pounds. Henry Moore writes : " Mr.
Wesley's accounts lie before me, and his expenses are noted
with the greatest exactness. Every penny is recorded ; and,
I am persuaded, the supposed ;^30,ooo might be increased
several thousands more."^
Wesley made a will, in which he bequeathed his book
business, and his books then on sale, (subject to a rent charge
of ^85 a year to the widow and children of his brother,) to
the Methodist conference, in trust " for carrying on the work
of God, by itinerant preachers " ; his furniture, books, and
whatever else belonged to him at Kingswood, to Coke,
Mather, and Moore, "in trust, to be still employed in
teaching and maintaining the children of poor travelling
preachers" ; all the books which belonged to him in his
studies at London and other places, to Coke, Whitehead, and
Moore, " in trust, for the use of the preachers who shall
labour there from time to time" ; all his manuscripts to the
same Coke, Whitehead, and Moore, "to be burned, or
' Now his steward. ^ The sentence is unfinished.
2 Samuel Bradburn remarks : " I know that, from the conference of
1780 to the conference of 1781, he gave away, in prhmte cha7i(ies, above
^^1400. He told me himself, in 1787, that he never gave away, out of his
own pocket, less than ^1000 a year." Bradburn adds : "He never re-
lieved poor people in the street, but he either took off, or removed, his hat
to them, when they thanked him,"
Wesley s Last Will. 617
published, as they saw good" ; his gowns, cassocks, sashes, 179°
and bands in City Road chapel, " for the use of the clergymen Age 87
attending there"; his "pelisse to the Rev, Mr. Creighton";
all the rest of his "wearing apparel to four of the travelling
preachers that wanted it most " ; his watch to Joseph
Bradford ; his gold seal to Elizabeth Ritchie ; his chaise and
horses to James Ward and Charles Wheeler, " in trust, to be
sold, and the money to be divided, one half to Hannah
Abbott, and the other to the members of the select society" ;
and copies of the eight volumes of his sermons to " each
travelling preacher who should remain in the connexion six
months after his decease."
All this was property, but not money. Hitherto, not a
coin has been bequeathed ; but still there are six clauses in
Wesley's will, which may be designated monetary. We give
them in substance, though the first two seem to contradict
each other, (i) All the coins, and whatever else was found
in the drawer of his bureau at London, to his granddaughters,
Mary and Jane Smith. (2) Whatever money remained in
his bureau and pockets, to Thomas Briscoe, William Collins,
John Easton, and Isaac Brown. (3) Out of the first money
arising from the sale of books, £Afi to his sister Martha, ^^40
to Mr. Creighton, and £60 to the Rev. Mr. Heath. (4) The
annuity of iJ"5, left by Roger Shiel to Kingswood school, to
be paid to Henry Brooke, Arthur Keene, and William White-
stone. (5) A pound each to the six poor men who should
carry his body to the grave. (6) Any personal estate, undis-
posed of, to be given to his two nieces, E. Ellison, S. Collet,
equally.
The reader has here the substance of Wesley's will. Where
were his hoardings, his money put out to interest, his landed,
household, and chapel property .'' He had none. He died,
as he had lived, without a purse. He had been his own
executor as far as possible ; and now had nothing to bequeath,
except what, in his lifetime, could not easily be turned into
current coin.
We return to his itinerary. Leaving Hull, Wesley pro-
ceeded to Lincolnshire. On June 29, the crowd at Owston
was such that he had to preach in the open air. At Lincoln,
his text was, "One thing is needful." "Is this the great Mr.
6i8 Life and Times of Wesley.
1790 Wesley;?" exclaimed a lady when retiring : "why, the poorest
AgeS; person in the chapel might understand him." " Yes," replied
a gentleman; "in this he displays his greatness, that while
the most ignorant can understand him, the most learned are
edified, and can take no offence." ^ On Friday, July 2, he
preached twice, once out of doors at Newton, and a second
time in the chapel at Gainsborough. On Saturday, he
preached at Epworth, and met the society. On Sunday,
July 4, he attended his father's church, where the congregation
was five times, and the attendance at sacrament ten times,
larger than usual. Besides this, he preached at Misterton, to
a great multitude, "under a spreading tree"; and, in Epworth .
market place, to "such a congregation as was never seen at
Epworth before."
Here occurs an eight weeks' hiatus in Wesley's journal.
The space between July 4 and August 27 we shall fill up in
the best way we can.
i At Doncaster, where he had a crowded congregation, a
burly butcher, noted for his popery, his wickedness, and his
pugilistic feats, was converted, became a Methodist, and, to .
his dying day, continued a peaceful, humble, loving Christian.^
This was probably on July 5, as, on the day following, he was
at Rotherham.^ There can be no question, that Sheffield also
would be visited ; and, most likely, Derby and Nottingham ;
also perhaps Castle Donington, Leicester, Coventry, and
other places. At all events, the Castle Donington old
stewards' book contains this item : " 1790. Paid for Mr.
Wesley's carriage through the circuit, £i 6j."*
We cannot trace him farther; but, three weeks after he was
at Doncaster and Rotherham, he opened his conference at
Bristol, — the last that he attended. Charles Atmore writes :
" Mr. Wesley appeared very feeble ; his eyesight had failed so
much that he could not see to give out the hymns ; yet his
voice was strong, his spirit remarkably lively, and the powers
of his mind, and his love towards his fellow creatures, were as
bright and as ardent as ever."^
^ Methodist Magazine, 1825, p. 25.
2 Ibid. 1828, p. 741 ; and Christian Miscellany, 1847, P- ^73-
3 Methodist Magazine, 1 792, p. 288. ^ Ibid. 1 856, p. 234. * Ibid, i S45, p. 1 23.
Conference of \']<^o. 619
The only legislation at this conference was concerning 1790
preachers and preaching houses. Age 87
In reference to the latter, it was determined : (i) That, in
future, all chapels should be built on the same plan as those
in Bath and in City Road. (2) No chapel should be under-
taken without the consent of a majority of the connexional
building committee. (3) Not a stone was to be laid, till the
chapel was settled after the Methodist form, verbatim ; nor
until two thirds of the estimated expense were subscribed ;
and no collections were to be made for any chapel except in
the circuit where it was to be erected.
Then in reference to preachers: (i) None, in future, were
to attend conference, except those whose travelling expenses
were paid by the circuits in which they respectively laboured.
Those in Scotland and Wales were to be the only exceptions.
(2) The assistants were to tell the people, that every circuit
must bear its own burden, and that those circuits which " did
not provide for their preachers and their children, (except
Scotland, Ireland, and Wales,) should have no more preachers
sent to them, for the time to come, than they would provide
for." (3) No assistant was to take into society any one put
out by his predecessor, without consulting him. (4) Preachers
were never to hasten home to their families, after evening
preaching, till they had met the society. (5) No preacher
was to leave conference before the conclusion of it, without
consent publicly obtained. (6) No preacher was to preach
three times the same day to the same congregation ; or oftener
than twice on a week day, or thrice on Sundays.
In reference to the last of these regulations, Adam Clarke
relates that Wesley was outwitted. In a private meeting with
some of his principal and senior preachers, Wesley proposed
that no preacher should preach thrice on the same day. Messrs.
Mather, Pawson, Thompson, and others objected. Wesley
replied: " It must be given up; we shall lose our preachers
by such excessive labour." They answered : " We have all
done so ; and you, even at a very advanced age, have con-
tinued to do so." " What I have done," said he, " is out of
the question : my life and strength have been under an
especial providence ; besides, I know better than they how to
preach without injuring myself; and no man can preach thrice
620
Life a7td Times of Wesley.
1790
AgTs:
a day without killing himself sooner or later ; and the custom
shall not be continued." The objectors pressed the point no
further, finding that he was determined ; but deceived him
after all, by altering the minute thus, when it was sent to
press : " No preacher shall preach three times the same day,
to the same congrcgationy
This was not ingenuous. Wesley was right ; and Methodism
has paid an incalculable penalty by disregarding his almost
dying wish. Clarke justly remarks :
" He who preaches the gospel, as he ought, must do it with his whole
strength of body and soul ; and he who undertakes a labour of this kind
thrice every Lord's day will infallibly shorten his life by it. He who,
instead of ptrachitig, talks to the people, — merely speaks about good
things, or tells a religious story, — will never injure himself by such an
employment : but such a person does not labour in the word and doctrine ;
he tells his tale ; and, as he preaches, so his congregation believes ; and
sinners are left as he found them." ^
During the last decade of years in Wesley's life, Methodism
had made amazing progress. In 1780, there were 64 circuits in
the United Kingdom ; now there were 1 1 5. Then there were
171 itinerant preachers employed; now there were 294. Then
there were 43,380 members of society ; now there were 71,568.
Then there were no missionary stations ; now 19 missionaries
were appointed to Antigua, Barbadoes, St. Vincent's, St.
Christopher's, Nevis, Tortola, Jamaica, Nova Scotia, and
Newfoundland, which had an aggregate membership of 5350
persons, — 800 in Nova Scotia and Newfoundland, and 4550
in the West Indies. In 1780, there were in America twenty
circuits, 42 itinerant preachers, and 8504 members of society.
In 1790, there were 114 circuits, 228 itinerant preachers, and
57,631 members of society.
These statistics, put into another form, will stand thus.
Methodist Circuits
throughout the world.
Methodist Itinerant
Preachers.
Methodist Members.
1790
1780
240
84
541
213
134,549
52,334
Increase
in 10 years.
} 156
328
82,215
^ Clarke's Life, vol. i., p. 277.
Dress. 62 1
Marvellous had been the success of Methodism up to the i79°
)^ear 1780 ; and, yet, the results during the last ten years of Age 87
Wesley's life were much more than double the united results
of the forty years preceding !
Before leaving the conference of 1790, we insert an unpub-
lished letter, addressed by Miss Ritchie to the wife of one of
Wesley's clerical assistants, the Rev. Peard Dickenson.
" Aligns 1 2,, 1790.
"... I felt much for our Zion previous to the conference. Our
dear and honoured father's state of health was alarming; but prayer
was heard, and he is much better, and things have such an appearance as
revives my hope that we shall still go on in the good old way.
" Mr. Wesley has very openly and fully declared his sentiments respect-
ing the impropriety of a separation from the Church; and the preachers,
in general, have agreed to abide by the old plan. I sincerely pity Dr.
Coke ; but I really believe good will be brought out of evil.
" The preachers have had a most searching conference, and the Lord
has been very present. The preachers' dress has been largely debated, and
what is verging towards worldly conformity is to be laid aside. We all
lament dress as a growing evil among the Methodists ; and, if the
preachers are not patterns in this respect, how can they exhort the
people? One morning, at breakfast, among a very few select friends,
Mr. Wesley said he had some things to complain of, which he had better
mention before half-a-dozen persons than before a hundred. Among
other things, he spoke with disapprobation of the ruffles on Mr. Dicken-
son's shirts. I endeavoured to soften matters, saying, that you desired to
take them off, and that, if this was not already done, it was because you
had been prevented ; on which I was requested to mention to you the
conversation which had taken place. My dear sister, let me beg of you
then, never to let IMr. Dickenson wear a ruffled shirt again. You both
love our dear father too well to giieve him. Yours in Jesus,
" Elizabeth Ritchie."
As soon as the Bristol conference was ended, the veteran
evangelist again set out on his glorious mission, and spent
the next three weeks in Whales. At Brecon, he preached in
the town hall ; and in Watton chapel, on the state of the
church at Ephesus, and our Lord's lamentation over Jerusa-
lem.^ At Haverfordwest, he wrote as follows, to Thomas
Roberts, then a young preacher, of four years' standing,
whom he had just appointed to the Bristol circuit.
' Methodist Magazine, 1847, p. 211.
622 Life and Times of Wesley.
1790 " Haverfordwest, August 13, 1790.
Age 87
"Dear Tommy, — Now I shall make a trial of you, whether I can
confide in you or no. Since I came hither, I have been much concerned.
This is the most important circuit in all Wales ; but it has been vilely
neglected by the assistant, whom, therefore, I can trust no more. I can
trust you, even in so critical a case. I desire, therefore, that, whoever
opposes, you will set out immediately, and come hither as soon as ever
you can. I wish you could meet fne at Cardiff, or Cowbridge. You will
see, by the printed plan, when I shall be at either of those places. If you
have not notice enough to do this, meet me to-morrow sennight at the
New Passage, unless you can get a passage by the weekly boat to Swansea.
If it be possible, do not fail. It may be, this may be the beginning of a
lasting friendship between you and, dear Tommy, yours, etc.,
" John Wesley." 1
At Pembroke, Wesky Avrote the following to Mr. William
Mears, a useful local preacher, at Rochester.
"Pembroke, August 16, 1790.
" My dear Brother, — It is my desire that all things be done to the
satisfaction of all parties. If, therefore, it be more convenient, let brother
Pritchard's^ family be at Canterbury, and sister Boone^ lodge in Chatham
house.
" Why do you not again set on foot a weekly subscription in order to
lessen your debt ? Have neither the preachers nor the people any spirit
in them ? Who begins .'' I will give half-a-crown a week for a year, if
all of you will make it up twenty shillings.
" I am, dear Billy, your affectionate brother,
"John Wesley."*
In a letter to his niece, Miss Sarah Wesley, dated " Near
Cowbridge, August 18, 1790," he writes : "I always reprove
profane sailors, or, what is worse, profane gentlemen ; and
many of them will receive it civilly, if not thankfully. They
all know^, captains as well as common men, that swearing is
not necessary. And, even now, we have captains of several
men-of-war who do not swear at all ; and never were men
better obeyed." ^
Thus was Wesley always about his heavenly Father's work.
On August 27, he returned to Bristol, in the neighbourhood
of which he was busily employed till September 2'].
^ Methodist Magazine, 1837, p. ir.
2 The assistant in Chatham circuit,
' The wife of Charles Boone, the assistant in Canterbury circuit.
* Local Preachers' Magazitie, 1851, p. 75.
* Methodist Magazine, 1847, p. 656.
A Dubliji Revival. 623
In the morning of Sunday, August 29, he read prayers, 1790
preached, and administered the Lord's supper, a service in AgeS?
which, without assistance, he was occupied for three full
hours; and, yet, in the afternoon, he preached again, out of
doors. The next day, we find him preaching twice, at Castle
Carey, and Ditcheat.
On Tuesday 31, he was visited by a liisus natiircc, William
Kingston, born without arms, who, in Wesley's presence, took
his teacup between his toes, and the toast with his other
foot ; and afterwards, by another feat, showed himself to be a
man of no mean penmanship. On the same day, Wesley had
" a lovely congregation at Shepton Mallet," and a crowded
one at Pensford.
During the remainder of the week, he preached at Bristol,
and corrected and abridged the Life of Mrs. Scudamore.
On Saturday, September 4, he went to Bath and preached;
and on Sunday, the 5th, writes : " At ten we had a numerous
congregation, and more communicants than ever I saw here
before. This day, I cut off that vile custom, I know not
when or how it began, of preaching three times a day by the
same preacher to the same congregation ; enough to weary
out both the bodies and minds of the speaker, as well as his
hearers." On Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday, in the
ensuing week, he preached once daily, and on Friday twice.
On Sunday, September 12, he employed himself in Bristol,
and, during the week following, met the classes, containing
944 members, and likewise preached at Thornbur}-, and at
Kingswood.
In labour like this the whole month was spent.
At the preceding conference, Wesley had appointed Adam
Clarke to the Dublin circuit, and, on September 5, Adam
wrote him a long letter, telling him that Thomas Rutherford
had been laid aside by rheumatic fever, and that the results
of a religious revival had been destroyed by the extravagant
irregularities of those who conducted the prayer-meetings
during Mr. Rutherford's illness. These meetings had been,
and still were, kept up till ten or eleven o'clock on Sunday
nights, and sometimes till twelve and one ; and it was no
uncommon thing for a person, in the midst of them, to give
an exhortation of half or three quarters of an hour's continu-
624 Life and Times of Wesley.
^79° ance. Clarke wished to correct these irregularities, and wrote
Age 87 to Wesley for advice/ who replied to him as follows.
" Bristol, September 9, 1790,
" Dear Adam, — Did not the terrible weather that you had at sea make
you forget your fatigue by land ? Come, set one against the other, and
you have no great reason to complain of your journey.
" You will have need of all the courage and prudence God has given
you. Indeed, you will want constant supplies of both. Very gently, and
very steadily, you should proceed between the rocks on either hand.
In the great revival at London, my first difficulty was, to bring into
temper those who opposed the work ; and my next, to check and regulate
the extravagances of those that promoted it. And this was far the
hardest part of the work ; for many of them would bear no check at all.
But I followed one rule, though with all calmness : * You must either bend
or break.' Meantime, while you act exactly right, expect to be blamed by
both sides. I will give you a few directions, (i) See that no prayer-
meeting continue later than nine at night, particularly on Sunday : let
the house be emptied before the clock strikes nine. (2) Let there be no
exhortation at any prayer-meeting. (3) Beware of jealousy, or judging
one another. (4) Never think a man is an enemy to the work, because
he reproves irregularities. Peace be with you and yours !
" I am, etc.,
"John Wesley."^
Clarke acted upon Wesley's good advice, and wrote him
the results. Wesley answered.
" Bedford, October 28, 1790.
"Dear Adam, — I am glad my letter had so good an effect. I dearly
love our precious society in Dublin, and cannot but be keenly sensible of
anything that gives them disturbance. I am glad our leaders have
adopted that excellent method of regularly changing their classes. Wher-
ever this has been done, it has been a means of quickening both the leaders
and the people. I wish this custom could be more extensively introduced.
" You did well to prevent all irregular and turbulent prayer-meetings,
and, at all hazards, to keep the meetings of the society private.
" Poor Mr. Smyth is now used just as he used me. He must either
bend or break. Although you cannot solicit any of Bethesda to join with
us, yet neither can you refuse them when they offer their hand.
" You do well to offer all possible courtesy to Mr. William Smyth and
his family.
" As long as the society in Dublin continues upward of a thousand, you
will have no reason to complain.
" I am, etc.,
"John Wesley."'
^ Wesley an Times, June 11, 1866. ^ Wesley's Works, vol. xiii., p. 98.
^ Wesley an Times, June 11, 1866.
Christian Perfection. 625
Before returning to Wesley's journal, another letter may 1790
be welcome. It was addressed to Mr. Robert C. Bracken- a~87
bur)^ Wesley's reference to himself is touching ; and his
remarks on the doctrine of Christian perfection ought to
be remembered.
" Bristol, September 15, 1790.
" Dear Sir,— I am glad to find you are in better bodily health, and
not weary and faint in your mind. My body seems nearly to have done
its work, and to be almost worn out. Last month, my strength was nearly
gone, and I could have sat almost still from morning to night. But,
blessed be God, I crept about a little, and made shift to preach once a day.
On Monday, I ventured a little further; and, after I had preached three
times (once in the open air), I found my strength so restored, that I could
have preached again without inconvenience.
" I am glad brother D has more light with regard to full sanctifi-
cation. This doctrine is the grand deposiitim which God has lodged with
the people called Methodists; and, for the sake of propagating this
chiefly, He appeared to have raised them up.
" I congratulate you upon sitting loose to all below ; stedfast in the
liberty wherewith Christ has made you free. Moderate riding on horse-
back, chiefly in the south of England, would improve your health. If you
choose to accompany me, in any of my little journeys on this side
Christmas, whenever you were tired you might go into my carriage. I
am not so ready a writer as I was once ; but, I bless God, I can scrawl
a little, — enough to assure you that,
" I am, dear sir, your affectionate friend and brother,
■ "John Wesley."'
On Monday, September 27, Wesley set out from Bristol
to London, and preached at Devizes and Salisbury, On
Wednesday we find him preaching at Winchester and Ports-
mouth ; and on Thursday and P>iday at Newport, in the
Isle of Wight. 1^
On Saturday, October 2, he left Portsmouth, at two o'clock
in the morning ; and, at Cobham, twenty miles from London,
was met by James and Hester Ann Rogers, and six other
friends, in carriages, to welcome him.^ Mr. Rogers writes :
" He arrived in good health and spirits. Wc all dined at
Cobham, and, about six in the evening, reached London,
where we praised the Lord with joyful hearts." 3
'Wesley's Works, vol. xiii., p. 8.
^ This was done with the approbation of the London stewards, who paid
£\ igs. for the carriages and expenses. (City Road society book.)
^ Life of James Rogers, p. 44.
VOL. III. S S
626 Life and Th)ies of Wesley.
1790 The next day, Sunday, October 3, he preached twice in the
Age 87 City Road chapel, and held a lovefeast. Rogers says :
" Many souls were greatly comforted. Indeed, his preaching, during
the whole winter, was attended with uncommon unction ; and he fre-
quently spoke, both in his sermons and exhortations, as if each time were
to be his last; and often desired the people to receive what he advanced
as his dying charge. His conversation also, in his family, seemed to
indicate a presentiment of death. He frequently spoke of the state of
separate spirits, and their particular employments ; and, for the last three
months of his life, there were scarcely three evenings passed together, but
he gave out and sung, in the family, the hymn beginning with the line,
* Shrinking from the cold hand of death.' "^
After spending two short days in London, Wesley set off,
on October 5, to Rye, a distance of upwards of sixty miles,
and preached to a large and serious congregation. The day
after, for the last time, he preached in the open air. This was
at Winchelsea, beneath an ash tree, in the churchyard, — a
tree long protected by the vicar of the parish, and known
for miles round, by the name of "Wesley's Tree," though
often mutilated by pilgrim Methodists, who chopped and
lopped it for wood to make it into Methodist snuff boxes,
and other iin Wesleyan mementoes of Wesley's last outdoor
preaching service. On one occasion, a local preacher was
detected in the act of bearing away a bough in pious
triumph, was apprehended for the theft, had to beg for
mercy, was solemnly reprimanded, and was threatened with
transportation, in case of repeating the offence. Wesley's text,
at Winchelsea, was a part of Christ's first outdoor sermon,
" The kingdom of God is at hand ; repent ye, and believe the
gospel ;" and he writes : " It seemed as if all that heard were,
for the present, almost persuaded to be Christians." Robert
Miller was with him at the time, and says: "The word was
attended with mighty power, and the tears of the people
flowed in torrents."^ On the evening of the same day, he
preached again at Rye.
Returning to London, for the services on Sunday, October
10, Wesley started on the day following for Norfolk. At
Colchester, things were disheartening, but he says he had,
' Life of James Rogers, p. 44.
2 Youth's Instrucioy, 1833, p. 330.
A Shoemaker, and a Sheep Stealer. 627
"on IMonday and Tuesday evenings, wonderful congregations ^79*^
of rich and poor, clergy and laity." One of his hearers was Age 87
a shoemaker, a young man of twenty-four, who was then
convinced of sin, became a useful local preacher, and often
returned from his appointments besmeared, from head to foot,
with the filthy missiles of persecuting mobs. William Candler,
the preaching shoemaker, took a deep interest in the spiritual
welfare of soldiers, and was not unrewarded ; for, one morning,
to his great surprise, he received a government commission to
make military shoes, and an extraordinary despatch, from the
Colchester commanding officer, that all the shoemakers in the
regiments stationed at Harwich, Ipswich, and Colchester, should
assist him in executing the martial order. For near fifty
years, William Candler rendered important service to the cause
of Christ, and then, in 1838, died, kissing his family, and
whispering to each, " Good bye ; God bless you ! " ^
In years past, Colchester had been one of Wesley's favourite
places ; but now, he says, " the society was lessened, and
cold enough ; preaching was discontinued, and the spirit of
Methodism quite gone, from the preachers and the people."
All this was the result of the clerical interference of the Rev.
Mr. S , of St. Peter's, who had adopted the theory, that,
wherever there was a gospel ministry in the Church, Methodist
preaching ought to cease, and Methodist societies be handed
over to the care of the gospel clergyman. To accomplish
this at Colchester, no pains were spared, and even gifts and
bribes were used. Wesley was annoyed, and, in the course of
his sermon, said : " I understand there is a sheep stealer in
Colchester, who takes both sheep and lambs from his neigh-
bour's fold at will. Now, I charge that man to desist ; or to
meet me, and answer for his deeds, at the bar of God, in the
day of judgment." The reverend gentleman was present; and
his subsequent conduct showed that he was not a forgetful
hearer. ^
Wesley had, in his congregation, at Colchester, another
remarkable hearer, Henry Crabb Robinson, who writes :
"It was, I believe, in October 1790, that I heard John Wesley in the
^ Methodist Magazine, 1S41, p. i. * Ibid.
628 Life and Times of Wesley.
1790 great round meeting-house at Colchester. He stood in a wide pulpit, and
— • on each side of him stood a minister, and the two held him up, having
^^ "^ their hands under his armpits. His feeble voice was barely audible ; but
his reverend countenance, especially his long white locks, formed a picture
never to be forgotten. There was a vast crowd of lovers and admirers.
It was for the most part a pantomime, but the pantomime went to the
heart. Of the kind, I never saw anything comparable to it in after
life."
Considering the long picturesque life which Mr. Robinson
lived subsequent to this, the last sentence is remarkable. In
a letter dated October 18, 1790, this young auditor, then
fifteen years of age, remarks :
" I felt great satisfaction last week in hearing that veteran in the service
of God, the Rev. John Wesley. At another time, and not knowing the
man, I should almost have ridiculed his figure. Far from it now, I
looked upon him with a respect bordering upon enthusiasm. After the
people had sung one verse of a hymn, he arose and said : 'It gives me a
great pleasure to find that you have not lost your singing ; neither men
nor women. You have not forgotten a single note. And I hope, by the
assistance of God, which enables you to sing well, you may do all, other
things well.' A universal 'Amen' followed. At the end of every head or
division of his discourse, he finished by a kind of prayer, a momentary
wish as it were, not consisting of more than three or four words, which was
always followed by a universal buzz. His discourse was short. The text
I could not hear. After the last prayer, he rose up and addressed the
people on liberality of sentiment, and spoke much against refusing to join
with any congregation on account of difference in opinion."^
On Wednesday, October 1 3, Wesley went from Colchester
to NorAvich, and writes : " I preached ; but the house would
in nowise contain the congregation. How wonderfully is the
tide turned! I am become an honourable man at Norwich,
God has, at length, made our enemies to be at peace with us ;
and scarce any but antinomians open their mouths against
us."
The next day, he preached at Yarmouth, to a congrega-
tion " far too large to get into the chapel." And the day
following at Lowestoft. Here again, he had another dis-
tinguished hearer, the poet Crabbe ; and repeated the well
known lines from Anacreon, with an application of his own.
* " Diary, Reminiscences, and Correspondence of Henry Crabb
Robinson," vol. i., p. 20.
Age 87
IVeslcy and Crabbe the Poet. 629
" Oft am I by woman told, 179°
Poor Anacreon ! thou grow'st old ;
See, thine hairs are falling all :
Poor Anacreon ! how they fall !
Whether I grow old or no.
By these signs, I do not know ;
But this I need not to be told,
'Tis time to live, if I grow old."
Crabbe was greatly struck with the reverend appearance
of the aged preacher, with his cheerful air, and the beautiful
cadence he gave to the lines he quoted ; and, after the
service, was introduced to him, and was received with bene-
volent politeness.^
On Saturday, October i6, Wesley preached at Loddon and
at Norwich; and, next day, twice again in the latter city,
besides administering the sacrament at seven o'clock in the
morning, to about one hundred and fifty persons. He writes :
" I take knowledge, that the last year's preachers were in
earnest. Afterwards, we went to our own parish church ;
although there was no sermon there, nor at any of the thirty-
six churches in the town, save the cathedral and St. Peter's."
Who will say that Methodist preaching was not needed in
this noH-preaching diocesan city .-*
On Monday, October i8, Wesley preached at Swaffham,
and at Lynn. At the latter place, he preached again on
Tuesday, administered the sacrament,^ made a collection for
the Sunday-schools, and had present to hear him all the
clergymen of the town, except one, whose lameness prevented
his attending. On Wednesday, the 20th, he occupied the
church at Diss, one of the largest in the county. "I suppose,"
says he, " it has not been so filled these hundred years." His
text was, " Seek ye the Lord while He may be found" ; and
the results of the sermon were remarkable and lasting.*
On the evening of the same day, and also on the day
following, he preached at Bury St. Edmunds ; and on Friday,
October 22, returned to London.
The last entry, in Wesley's published journal, is dated two
days later. " Sunday, October 24 — I explained, to a numer-
Crabbc's Life. " Methodist Magazine, 1856, p. 203.
3 Reynolds' " Anecdotes of Wesley," p. 39.
630 Life and Times of Wesley.
1790 ous congregation, in Spitalfields church, 'the whole armour
A^S; of God.' St. Paul's, Shadwell, was still more crowded in the
afternoon, while I enforced that important truth, 'one thing is
needful'; and I hope many, even then, resolved to choose the
better part."
There can be little doubt, that the rest of the year was
occupied with what Wesley often called his" " little journeys^'
into Bedfordshire, Northamptonshire, Hertfordshire, Kent,
etc. The reader will catch glimpses of him in the following
letters.
The first was addressed to his niece, Miss Sarah Wesley, at
Mrs. Whitcomb's, in Margate. The reference to his relatives
is significant and painful.
" London, October 5, 1790.
" Dear Sally, — I am glad you are situated so comfortably. Mrs.
Wliitcomb does really fear God ; and, I hope, before you leave her house,
will know what it is to love Him. Providence has not sent you to spend
a little time in Margate merely on your own account. Before you leave jt,
she, with several others, shall have reason to praise God that you came.
See that you lose no time, A word spoken in season how good is it !
Warn every one, and exhort every one, if by any means you may save
some. ' In the morning sow thy seed, and in the. evening withhold not
thy hand ; for thou knowest not which shall prosper.' Say not, * I can do
nothing, I am slow of speech.' True; but who made the tongue ? You
have seen sister Boon, a loving, simple hearted woman. Be a follower of
her, as she is of Christ. Why should you not meet in her class ? I think
you will not be ashamed. Is it not a good opportunity of coming a little
nearer to them that love you well ? Let me have the comfort of one
relation, at least, that will be an assistant to me in the blessed work of
God.
" I must visit other places before I come into Kent, as well as visit the
classes in London ; so that I cannot be at Margate till the latter end of
next month. If you stay there till then, you will see me.
" I am, my dear Sally, your affectionate uncle,
"John Wesley."*
The next was written the day after his return to town from
Norfolk, and was addressed to James Macdonald, then
stationed at Newry, in Ireland. It will be seen, that the
Methodist sin of neglecting fasting is not of recent growth.
"London, October 2^, 1790.
" My dear Brother,— You have great reason to praise God for His
* Methodist Magazine, 1846, p. 11 89.
A Large Circuit. 631
late glorious work at and near Newry; and I make no doubt, but it will 179^
continue, yea, and increase, if the subjects of it continue to walk humbly ^^ g^
and closely with God. Exhort all our brethren steadily to wait upon God
in the appointed means of fasting and prayer ; the former of which has
been almost universally neglected by the Methodists, both in England
and Ireland. But it is a true remark of Kempis : ' The more thou deniest
thyself, the more thou wilt grow in grace.'
" I am, etc.,
"John Wesley."*
Something has been already said respecting the division of
circuits. The Dales circuit in 1790 had forty-three preaching
places, including Barnardcastle, Bishop Auckland, Appleby,
Alstone, Allendale, Wolsingham, Hexham, Penrith, and
Kendal, — now all of them circuit towns themselves. The
nearest neighbouring circuit, eastwards, was Yarm ; west-
wards, Whitehaven ; northwards, Newcastle ; and south-
wards, Thirsk. This will give the reader an idea of the
enormous region embraced in the Dales circuit at the time to
which we are now adverting. Within the. same border, there
are now not fewer than at least twenty circuit towns, most of
them the centre of a large cluster of smaller towns and
villages.^ The Dales circuit, in 1790, had three itinerant
preachers, and 980 members of society, who contributed for
the maintenance of their preaching triumvirate, during the
quarter in which Wesley died, the sum of £2(^ ^s. 6d.,
sevenpence per member per quarter, and aftbrding £() i6s. 2d.
for the support of each preacher, his wife, and family, and the
general maintenance of Methodist machinery throughout the
circuit.^ George Holder was the assistant, and Jonathan
Hern and John Wittam were his colleagues. The feed was
poor, the pay pauperish, the journeys long, the roads bad, the
region mountainous, and the work heavy. There was a wish
to divide the circuit ; but the following was Wesley's reply
to Holder.
" London, October 30, 1 790.
" Dear George, — The assistant in every circuit (not the leaders) is to
determine how each preacher is to travel. If Jonathan Hern will not, or
^ Wesley's Works, vol. xiii., p. 113.
^ Merely in the circuits aljove mentioned (a fraction of the Dales
circuit) there are, at present,*78i9 members. (See Minutes of Conference,
1870.)
^ Circuit manuscript books.
632 Life and Times of Wesley.
1790 cannot, take his turn with his fellow labourers, I must send another that
— " will. 1 do not like dividing circuits. Could not three or more of the
^ northern places be added to the Sunderland or Newcastle circuits, in
order to lessen yours, and bring it into a six weeks' circuit ? Pray send
me the manner of your travelling through your circuit. I think, I shall
order it better.
" I am, with love to sister Holder, dear George, yours, etc.,
" John Wesley." *
A small circuit then was one of the things which Wesley
thought inimical to the interests of Methodism. Was Wesley
right .'' Unless Methodist preachers can become thoroughly
pastoral in their habits, — a thing which triennial changes
render extremely difficult, — would it not be better for circuits
to be of such a size as to make daily preaching a healthy
duty, instead of being so circumscribed that one or two
sermons, between sabbaths, is all that their necessities
require ? This is a serious problem, which we must leave
to be solved by others.
Another hindrance, as Wesley thought, to Methodist
progress, was the neglect of reading. Hence the following
extract from an unpublished letter, dated November 8, 1790.
" If you and your wife strengthen each other's hands in God, then you
will surely receive a blessing from Him. But it is not abundance of
money, or any creature, that can make us happy without Him.
" It cannot be that the people should grow in grace, unless they give
themselves to reading. A reading people will always be a knowing
people. A people who talk much will know little. Press this upon them
with your might ; and you will soon see the fruit of your labours."
An extract from another letter may be given here. The
letter was addressed to Alexander Mather.
" No, Aleck, no ! The danger of ruin to Methodism docs not lie here.
It springs from quite a different quarter. Our preachers, many of them,
are fallen. They are not spiritual They are not alive to God. They
are soft, enervated, fearful of shame, toil, hardship. They have not the
spirit which God gave to Thomas Lee at Pateley Bridge, or to you at
Boston. Give me one hundred preachers, who fear nothing but sin, and
desire nothing but God, and I care not a straw whether they be clergy-
men or laymen, such alone will shake the gates of hell, and set up the
kingdom of heaven upon earth," 2
1 Wesley's Works, vol. xiii., p. 109.
2 Sigston's Life of Bramwell.
Wesley s Publications, in 1790. 633
As we have often shown, Wesley regarded the preaching of 1790
the doctrine of Christian perfection as of the utmost import- ^^g g^
ance. The following letter to Adam Clarke is to the same
effect.
" London, November 26, 1 790.
" Dear Adam, — To retain the grace of God, is much more than to
gain it ; hardly one in three docs this. And this should be strongly and
explicitly urged on all who have tasted of perfect love. If we can prove
that any of our local preachers or leaders, either directly or indirectly,
speak against it, let him be a local preacher or leader no longer. I
doubt whether he should continue in society. Because he, that could
speak thus in our congregations, cannot be an honest man. I wish sister
Clarke to do what she can, but no more than she can. Betsy Ritchie,
Miss Johnson, and Mary Clarke are women after my own heart. Last
week I had an excellent letter from Mrs. Pawson, (a glorious witness of
full salvation.) showing how impossible it is to retain pure love without
growing therein. I am, etc.,
"John Wesley." '
Such letters might be greatly multiplied. , We only add
another. He was now an old man, and extremely feeble ;
and Mr. Ireland, having heard that claret wine had been
recommended to him by his medical adviser, sent him a
small ■'^'ase as a present. The wine was seized by the custom
house authorities, to whom Wesley addressed the following
laconic letter.
" City Road, Noveviber 14, 1790.
" Gentlemen, — Two or three days ago, Mr. Ireland sent me, as a
present, two dozen of French claret, which I am .ordered to drink, during
my present weakness. At the White Swan it was seized. Beg it may be
restored to,
" Your obedient servant,
"John Wesley.
" Whatever duty comes due, I will see duly paid."
The letter seems to have been returned to the dying man ;
and, across it, a government official curtly wrote : " No.
M. W." 2
Wesley's only publication, in 1790, besides the thirteenth
volume of his lilagazinc, was his translation of " The New
Testament, with an Analysis of the several Books and
Chapters." i6mo, 424 pages. In his preface, he remarks :
' Wesley's Works, vol. xiii., p. 99.
2 Manuscript letter, kindly lent by Charles Reed, Esq., M.P,
634 Life and Times of Wesley.
1790 "In this edition, the translation is brought as near as possible to the
— - original ; yet the alterations are few and seemingly small ; but they may
^^ ' be of considerable importance. Though the old division of chapters is
retained, for the more easy finding of any text, yet the whole is likewise
divided, according to the sense, into distinct sections ; a little circum-
stance which makes many passages more intelligible to the reader. The
analysis of every book and epistle is prefixed to it. And this view of the
general scope of each will give light to all the particulars."
It ought to be remarked, that this is, by no means, a
verbatim reprint of Wesley's translation, published with his
Notes in 1755. The book is extremely scarce; but the
variations are too numerous and minute to Be pointed out in
a work like this.
As it respects the Jllagaaine, there can be no doubt, that all
the articles composing it may be considered to be in harmony
with Wesley's own sentiments ; but, as usual, in this review,
we only notice the articles which Wesley himself contributed ;
and that, principally, for the purpose of obtaining knowledge
of his latest opinions and feelings. We pass over his
"Thoughts on Memory"; his critique on Captain Wilson's
"Account of the Pelew Islands"; and his "Thoughts on
Suicide"; and direct attention to his last, his dying ma"f}ifesto,
on separation from the Established Church. The article
is dated, "December 11, 1789," and is in the April number
of the Magazine for 1790.
He states that, next to the primitive church, he had, from
childhood, esteemed the Church of England as the most
scriptural, national church in the world ; and had, therefore,
not only assented to all the doctrines, but observed all the
rubric in the liturgy ; and that with all possible exactness,
even at the peril of his life. He proceeds to give the history
of the rise of Methodism, and of his own irregularities ; and
thus concludes :
" I never had any design of separating from the Church. I have no
such design now. I do not believe, the Methodists in general design it,
when I am no more seen. I do, and will do, all that is in my power
to prevent such an event. IN evertheless, in spite of all tbat I can do, many
of them will separate from it (although, I am apt to think, not one half,
perhaps not one third of them). These will be so bold and injudicious as
to form a separate party, which, consequently, will dwindle away into a
dry, dull, separate party. In flat opposition to these, I declare once more,
Separation from the Church. 635
that I live and die a member of the Church of England ; and that none, 179°
who regard my judgment or advice, will ever separate from it." . "g
To the same effect is his sermon on " No man taketh this
honour unto himself, but he that is called of God, as was
Aaron," — a sermon which he wrote at Cork, in May 1789, and
published in his magazine, twelve months afterwards. He
correctly maintains that, in ancient times, the offices of priest
and preacher were entirely distinct. Priests were not
preachers ; and preachers, or prophets, were not priests.
He argues that, in the New Testament, the office of an
evangelist is not the same as that of a pastor. Pastors
presided over the flock, and administered the sacraments ;
evangelists helped them, and preached the word. He asserts
that the same distinction is recognised in the English,
presbyterian, and Roman churches ; and then, coming to
Methodism, tells his readers that Methodist itinerant preachers
are evangelists, not pastors ; and that, their work is wholly
and solely to preach, not to administer sacraments. His
address to them is worth quoting.
" God has commissioned you to call sinners to repentance ; but it does
by no means follow from hence, that ye are commissioned to baptize, or
to administer the Lord's supper. Ye never dreamt of this, for ten or
twenty years after ye began to preach. Ye did not then, like Korah
Dafhan, and Abiram, seek the pricstJiood also. Ye knew, ' No man
taketh this honour to himself, but he that is called of God, as was Aaron.'
O contain yourselves within your own bounds. Be content with preaching
the gospel. Do the work of evangelists. I earnestly advise you, abide
in your place ; keep your own station. Ye were fifty years ago, — those of
you that were then Methodist preachers, — extraordinary messengers of
God, not going in your own will, but thrust out, not to supersede, but to
provoke to jealousy the ordinary messengers. In God's name, stop there !
Both by your preaching and example, provoke them to love and good
works. Ye are a new phenomenon in the earth ; a body of people, who,
being of no sect or party, are friends to all parties, and endeavour to
forward all, in the knowledge and love of God and man. Ye yourselves
were, at first, called in the Church of England ; and though ye have and
will have a thousand temptations to leave it, regard them not. Be Church
of England men still. Do not cast away the peculiar glory which God
hath put upon you, and frustrate the design of Providence, the very end
for which God raised you up."
In reply to the charge that he himself had already sepa-
rated from the Church, Wesley allows, that he deviated from
636 Life and Tifjtes of Wesley.
179° the rules of the Church in " preaching abroad," in "praying
Age 87 extempore," in forming societies, and in employing lay
preachers ; but he adds :
" All this is not separating from the Church. So far from it, that,
whenever I have opportunity, I attend the Church service myself, and
advise all our societies so to do. Nevertheless, the generality even of
religious people naturally think, 'I am inconsistent.' And they cannot
but think so, unless they observe my two principles. The one, that I dare
not separate from the Church, that I believe it would be a sin so to do ;
the other, that I believe it would be a sin not to riaty from it in the points
above mentioned. I say, put these two principles together, first, I will not
separate from the Church ; yet, secondly, in cases of necessity, I will
vary from it ; and inconsistency vanishes away. I have been true to my
profession from 1 730 to this day."
Here ^ve leave the matter. This is the last time we shall
quote Wesley on separation from the Church. We care not
either to vindicate or to condemn his thoughts and course of
conduct. In a few lines, Wesley here says all that can be
said in favour of the anomalous position in which he stood :
he did not separate, but he varied from the Church of England.
It will be difficult for either sophistry or sound argument to
make either more or less than this of the vexed question, —
the difference between Wesley's profession and his practice in
reference to his continued adherence to, or separation from,
the Established Church. He lived and died a hearty, but
inconsistent Churchman.
There is another point which must be mentioned. The
reader has already seen Wesley's intense anxiety in reference
to rich Methodists. In the last fourteen sermons that he
wrote, during the last two years of his eventful life, and which
were, for the first time, published in the magazines for 1790,
1791, and 1792, he again and again, in the strongest and
most affecting language, reverts to this momentous matter.
Exception may be taken to his opinions ; but they are
worthy of being quoted. They are the last sentiments of an
old man, with unparalleled experience ; and, throughout a
long life, were by himself reduced to practice. The following
are extracts.
In the remarkable sermon, on Jeremiah viii. 22, written in
Dublin, July 2, 1789, in which he tries to answer the
Wesley warning Rich JMetJiodists. 637
question, "Why has Christianity done so Httle good in the ^79°
Avorld ? " he writes : Age 87
" Who regards those solemn words, Lay 7iot up for yourselves treasures
upon earth ? Of the three rules, which are laid down on this head, in the
sermon on The Mammon of Unrighteousness, you may find many that
observe the first rule, namely, Gain all you can. You may find a few that
observe the second. Save all you can. But how many have you found,
that observe the third rule. Give all you can ? Have you reason to believe,
that five hundred of these are to be found among fifty thousand
Methodists ? And, yet, nothing can be more plain, than that all who
observe the two first rules, without the third, will be twofold more the
chiliiren of hell than ever they were before.
" O that God would enable me once more, before I go hence and am
no more seen, to lift up my voice like a trumpet to those \s\iO gain and save
all they can, but do not give all they can ! Ye are the men, some of the
chief men, who continually grieve the Holy Spirit of God, and, in a great
measure, stop His gracious influence from descending on our assemblies.
Many of your brethren, beloved of God, have not food to eat ; they have
not raiment to put on ; they have not a place where to lay their head.
And why are they thus distressed ? Because _j'^z; impiously, unjustly, and
cruelly detain from them what your Master and theirs lodges in your
hands, on purpose to supply their wants. In the name of God, what are
you doing ? Do you neither fear God, nor regard man ? Why do you not
deal your bread to the hungry ? And cover the naked with a garment ?
Have you laid out, in your own costly apparel, what would have answered
both these intentions? Did God command you so to do.'' Does He
commend you for so doing .'' Did He entrust you with His,— not your, —
goods for this end ? And does He now say, ' Servant of God, well done' .''
You well know He does not. This idle expense has no approbation,
either from God or your own conscience. But, you say, * You can afford
it ! ' O be ashamed to take such miserable nonsense into your mouths.
Never more utter such stupid cant, such palpable absurdity ! Can any
steward afford to be an arrant knave? to waste his lord's goods? Can
any servant afford Iq lay out his master's money, any otherwise than his
master appoints him ? So far from it, that whoever does this ought to be
excluded from a Christian society.
"I am distressed. I know not what to do. I see what I might have done
once. I might have said peremptorily and expressly, ' Here I am : I and
my Bible. I will not, I dare not, vary from this book, either in great things
or small. I have no power to dispense with one jot or tittle of what is
contained therein. I am determined to be a Bible Christian, not almost but
altogether. Who will meet me on this ground ? Join me on this, or not at
all.' With regard to dress in particular, I might have been as firm, (and I
now see it would have been far better,) as either the people called quakers,
or the Moravian brethren. I might have said, ' This is our manner of
' dress, which we know is both scriptural and rational. If you join with us,
6t,S Life and Times of Wesley.
1790 you 3re to dress as we do : but you need not join us unless you please.'
But alas! the time is now past. And what I can do now, I cannot tell.
Age 7 -pj^g Methodists grow more and more self indulgent, because they grow
ricli. Although many of them are still deplorably poor [Tell it not in
Cathj publish it not in the it reds of AskelonJ), yet many others, in the
space of twenty, thirty, or forty years, are twenty, thirty, yea, a hundred
times richer than they \\cre when they first entered the society. And it is
an observation which admits of few exceptions, that nine in ten of these
decreased in grace, in the same proportion as they increased in wealth.
Indeed, according to the natural tendency of riches, we cannot expect
it to be otherwise.
" But how astonishing a thing is this ! Does it not seem (and yet this
cannot be !) that true scriptural Christianity has a tendency, in process of
time, to undermine and destroy itself.'' For, wherever it spreads, it Aust
cause diligence and frugality, which, in the natural course of things, beget
riches. And riches naturally beget pride, love of the world, and every
temper that is destructive to Christianity. Now, if there be no way to
prevent this, Christianity is inconsistent with itself, and, of consequence,
cannot stand, cannot long continue among any people ; since, wherever it
generally prevails, it saps its own foundation.
"But, allowing that diligence and frugality must produce riches, is there
no means to hinder riches destroying the religion of those that possess
them .'' I can see only one possible way ; find out another who can. Do
you gain all you can, and save all you can? Then you must, in the nature
of things, grow rich. Then if you have any desire to escape the damna-
tion of hell, ^w all you can ; otherwise I can have no more hope of your
salvation, than for 'that of Judas Iscariot.
" I call God to record upon my soul, that I advise no more than I
practise. I do, blessed be God, gain, and save, and give all I can. And
so, I trust in God, I shall do, while the breath of God is in my nostrils.
But what then .? I count all things but loss, for the excellency of the
knowledge of Jesus, my Lord! Still
' I give up every plea beside, .
Lord, I am damned ! but Thou hast died !'" '
To the same effect is Wesley's searching and terrible sermon,
on the Rich Fool, written at Balham, February 19, 1790 ; and
another written at Bristol, September 21, 1790, on the text,
" If riches increase, set not thine heart upon them." In the
latter sermon, he writes :
" By whatsoever means thy riches increase, whether with or without
labour ; whether by trade, legacies, or any other way, unless thy charities
increase in the same proportion, — unless thou givest a full tenth of thy
" Methodist Magazine, 1790, pp. 348, 400, etc..
Wesley zuarning Rich Methodists. 639
substance, of thy fixed and occasional income, thou dost undoubtedly set 179°
thy heart upon thy gold, and it will eat thy flesh as fire. . "„
"But O ! who can convince a rich man, that he sets his heart upon
riches ? For considerably above half a century, I have spoken on this
head, with all the plainness that was in my power. But with how little
effect ? I doubt whether I have, in all that time, convinced fifty misers
of covetousness.
'•' I have a message from God unto thee, O rich man, whether thou Avilt
hear, or whether thou wilt forbear. Riches have increased with thee ; at
the peril of thy soul, set not thine heart upon them. Be thankful to Him
that gave thee such a talent, so much power of doing good. Yet dare not
to rejoice over them, but with fear and trembling. {y
" Let us descend to particulars ; and see that each of you deal faithfully
with his own soul. If any of you have now twice, thrice, or four times as
much substance as when you first saw my face, faithfully examine yourselves,
and see if you do not set your hearts, if not directly on riches themselves,
yet, on some of the things that are purchaseablc thereby, which comes to
the same thing. Do you not eat more plentifully or more delicately than you
did ten or twenty years ago 1 Do not you use more drink, or drink of a
more costly kind, than you did then ? Do you sleep on as hard a bed as
you did once, suppose your health will bear it ? Do yoyi fast as often now
you are rich, as you did when you were poor ? Ought you not in all
reason to do this, rather more often than more seldom? I am afraid, your
own heart condemns you. You are not clear in this matter.
" Do not some of you seek no small part of happiness in that trifle of
trifles, dress ? Do not you bestow more money, or, which is the same,
more time and pains upon it, than you did once ? I doubt this is not done
to please God. Then it pleases the devil. If you laid aside your needless
ornaments, some years since, ruffles, necklaces, spider caps, ugly, unbecom-
ing bonnets, costly linen, expensive laces, have you not, in defiance of
religion and reason, taken to them again ?
" After having served you between sixty and seventy years, with dim
eyes, shaking hands, and tottering feet, I give you one more advice before
I sink into the dust. Mark those words of St. Paul, Those that desire,
or endeavour, to be rich, that moment, fall into temptation; yea, a deep
gulf of temptation, out of which nothing less than Almighty power can
deliver them. Permit me to come a little closer still : perhaps I may
not trouble you any more on this head. I am pained for you tliat are
rich in this "world. Do you give all you can .'' You who receive ^500
a year, and spend only ^200, do you give ^{^300 back to God.? If
not, you certainly rob God of that ^300. ' Nay, may I not do what I will
•w\i\i my 0W71 ? ' Here lies the ground of your mistake. It is not your
own. It cannot be, unless you are Lord of heaven and earth. 'However,
I must provide for my children.' Certainly. But how .'' By making
them rich ? When you will probably make them heathens, as some of
you have done already. Leave them enough to live on, not in idleness
and luxury, but by honest industry. And if you have not children, upon
640 Life and Times of Wesley.
1790 what scriptural or rational principle can you leave a groat behind you,
■„ more than will bury you ? I pray consider : What are you the better for
" ° what you leave behind you ? What does it signify, whether you leave
behind you ten thousand pounds, or ten thousand shoes and boots ? Oh,
leave nothing behind you ! Send all you have before you into a better
world ! Lend it, lend it all unto the Lord, and it shall be paid you again !
Is there any danger that His truth should fail ? It is fixed as the pillars
of heaven. Haste, haste, my brethren, haste ! lest you be called away,
before you have settled what you have, on this security !" ^
To say the least, this was plain speaking, such as is seldom
heard at present ; the following, in the sermon on Matthew
vi. 22, 23, written at Bristol, September 25, 1789, is terrific.
" How great is the darkness of that execrable wretch (I can give him no
better title, be he rich or poor), who will sell his own child to the devil !
who will barter her own eternal happiness, for any quantity of gold or
silver ! What a monster would any man be accounted, who devoured the
flesh of his own offspring ! And is he not as great a monster, who, by his
own act and deed, gives her to be devoured by that roaring lion ? As he
certainly does (so far as is in his power), who marries her to an ungodly
man. 'But he is rich; he has ;^ 10,000 !' What if it were ^100,000?
The more the worse ; the less probability will she have of escaping the
damnation of hell. With what face w-ilt thou look upon her, when she
tells thee in the realms below, 'Thou hast plunged me into this place of
torment ! Hadst thou given me to a good man, however poor, I might
now have been in Abraham's bosom !'
" Are any of you, that are called Methodists, seeking to marry your
children well (as the cant phrase is), that is, to sell them to some purchaser,
that has much money, but little or no religion ? Have ye profited no
more by all ye have heard.'' Man, woman, think what you are about.
Dare you also sell your child to the devil ? You undoubtedly do this (as
far as in you lies), when you marry a son or a daughter to a child of the
devil, though it be one that wallows in gold and silver. O take warning
in time ! Beware of the gilded bait ! Death and hell are hid beneath.
Prefer grace before gold and precious stones ; glory in heaven, to riches
on earth ! If you do not, you are worse than the very Canaanites. They
only made their children /<wj throui^h ///^y?;-^ to Moloch. You make
■^oxvcs, pass into the fire that never shall be quenched, and to stay in it for
ever. O how great is the darkness that causes you, after you have done
this, to wipe your mouth and say, you have done no evil /
" Upwards of fifty years, I have ministered unto you. I have been your
servant for Christ's sake. During this time, I have given you many
solemn warnings on this head. I now give you one more, perhaps the
last. Dare any of you, in choosing your calling or situation, eye the
' Methodist Magazine, '792, p. 341, etc.
Wesley s Last JVords to the Methodists. 641
things on earth, rather than the things above ? In choosing a profession 1790
or a companion of Hfe for your child, do you look at earth or heaven ? — ■
And can you deliberately prefer, either for yourself or your offspring, a ' ^
child of the devil with money, to a child of God without it ? Repent,
repent of your vile earthly mindedness ! Renounce the title of Christians ;
or prefer, both in your own case and the case of your children, grace to
money, and heaven to earth. For the time to come, at least, let your eye
be single, that your whole body inay be full of light!"
These were Wesley's last words to the Methodists. The
extracts are long ; but, in this moijey making, mammon
worshipping, intensely worldly age, they may be useful.
The other sermons, published in the last year of Wesley's
life, and in the year subsequent to his death, are well worthy
of the reader's notice. That on " Knowing Christ after the
flesh" is perhaps the only one, in the English language, on
such a subject. That on the text, " There is one God," is
characteristically thoughtful, keen, logical, and evangelical.
That on "Walking by Faith," terse, vigorous, earnest, practical,
and terribly faithful. That on " The Wedding Garment,"
an excellent exposition of an often ill used text. That on
" The Deceitfulness of the Human Heart " is one which
none but a man like Wesley could have preached. That
on " Atheism," ingenious, searching, and powerful. That on
" The Treasure in Earthen Vessels," simple and beautiful.
While that on " Life like a Dream " was being printed on the
very day when Wesley's corpse lay in the chapel in City
Road ; and that on " Faith, the evidence of things not
seen," was the last he ever wrote, and was finished only six
weeks previous to his death.
Both the last mentioned deserve quoting. They are the
profoundly interesting musings of an old man, conscious that
he must soon enter the spiritual and unseen world. Imagining
a disembodied soul before him, he thus soliloquises.
" Now that your eyes are open, see how inexpressibly different are all
the things that are now around you ! What a difference do you perceive
in yourself! Where is your body.'' Your house of clay? Where are
your hmbs ? your hands, your feet, your head ? There they lie ; cold,
insensible ! What a change is in the immortal spirit ! You see every-
thing around you : but how ? Not with eyes of flesh and blood ! You
hear ; but not by a stream of undulating air, striking on an extended
membrane. You feel ; but in how wonderful a manner ! You have no
VOL. Ill T T
642 Life and Times of Wesley.
1790 nerves to convey the ethereal fire to the common sensory ; rather are you
not now all eye, all ear, all feeling, all perception ? "
Age 87
Again, in his last, the sermon on faith :
" How will this material universe appear to a disembodied spirit ? Who
can tell whether any of these objects, that now surround us, will appear
the same as they do now ? What astonishing scenes will then discover
themselves to our newly opening senses ! Probably fields of ether, not
only tenfold, but ten thousand fold, ' the length of this terrene.' And
with what variety of furniture, animate and inanimate ! How many orders
of beings, not discovered by organs of flesh and blood ! Perhaps
* thrones, dominions, principalities, and, powers !' And shall we not then,
as far as angels' ken, survey the bounds of creation, and see every place
where the Almighty
* Stopped His rapid wheels, and said.
This be thy just circumference, O world !'
Yea, shall we not be able to move, quick as thought, through the wide
realms of uncreated night ? Above all, the moment we step into eternity,
shall we not feel ourselves swallowed up of Him, who is in this and every
place, who filleth heaven and earth ? It is only the veil of flesh and blood
which now hinders us from perceiving, that the great Creator cannot but
fill the whole immensity of space. He is every moment above us, beneath
us, and on every side. Indeed, in this dark abode, this land of shadows,
this region of sin and death, the thick cloud, which is interposed between,
conceals Him from our sight. But then the veil will disappear, and He
will appear in unclouded majesty, God over all, blessed for ever ! "
The blessed old man already had glimpses of the shining
ones, and of the gates of that celestial city, into which, six
weeks after these words were written, he triumphantly entered.
o
I79I.
NLY two months of Wesley's eventful life are left 1791
unnarrated. The following letters, belonging to this aTTss
period, will be read with interest.
The first was addressed to Adam Clarke, who, in Dublin,
had buried his eldest daughter, and was himself dangerously
afflicted with rheumatic affection in the head.^
"January 3, 1791.
" Dear Adam, — You startle me when you talk of grieving so much for
the death of an infant. This is certainly a proof of inordinate affection ;
and, if you love them thus, all your children will die. How did Mr. De
Renty behave when he supposed his wife to be dying ? There is a pattern
for a Christian.
" But you forget to send me anything about magnetism. John Bredin
is a weak brother: let him not complain. He behaved ill both at Jersey
and Guernsey ; but let him behave well now, and that will be forgotten. I
wish my dear sister Clarke and you many happy years ; and am, dear
Adam, etc.,
"John Wesley." ^
The next has not before been published. It was written
to Thomas Taylor, then in the Hull circuit. Dr. King
was made archbishop of Dublin in 1702, and died in
1729. He was author of " De Origine Mali^' written to prove,
that the existence of natural and moral evil is not incom-
patible with the power and goodness of the Deity, and may
be accounted for without the supposition of an evil principle.
" London, January 6, 1791.
" Dear Tommv,— With regard to the powerful workings of the Spirit,
I think those words of our Lord are chiefly to be understood : ' The wind
bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof,' (thou art
sure of the fact,) 'but canst not tell whence it cometh, or whither it
goeth.'
" Make your yearly subscription when you see best, only take care it
does not interfere with any other subscription.
1 Clarke's Life, vol. i., pp. 278, 283.
2 Wesley Banner, 1852, p. 275 ; and Wesleyan Times, June I, 1S66
644 Life and Times of Wesley.
1791 " The tract of Archbishop King has been particularly admired by many
AeeSS Psi'sons of excellent sense. I do not admire it so much as they do ; but I
like it well. Yet, I have corrected a far better tract on the same subject,
perhaps, the last I shall have to publish.^
" Indeed, I hope I shall not live to be useless. I -wish you and yours
many happy years, and am, dear Tommy, etc.,
"John Wesley."
The next letter, addressed to Miss Bolton of Witney, con-
tains an important reference to Wesley's state of health.
" London, Jamtary 12, 1791.
" My dear Nancy, — I thank you for your welcome present, and
rejoice to hear that your health is better. What is it, which is good for
us, that our Lord will not give, if we can but trust Him ?
" These four last days, I have had better health than I had for several
months before. Only my sight continues much as it was. But good is
the will of the Lord.
" I am, dear Nancy, affectionately yours,
"J. Wesley." 2
The following was addressed to the wife of Adam Clarke,
and refers to her husband's serious affliction, as well as to the
loss of their daughter.
" London, Jmntary 18, 1791. .
"My dear Sister, — Before this time, I hope God has heard prayer,
and given brother Clarke a little more ease. I should suspect a dropsy
in the brain, which, though formerly judged incurable, has lately been
cured.
" Both brother Clarke and you have large proofs that whom the Lord
loveth He chasteneth. He knoweth the way whence you go ; when you
have been tried, you shall come forth as gold.
" I wonder at the folly of Mr. V. Surely, he is a very weak man. But
I shall judge better when I have seen his performances. Peace be multi-
plied again !
" I am, my dear sister, ever yours,
"John Wesley." ^
^ This was probably " An Essay on the Liberty of Moral Agents,"
published consecutively in the first five numbers of the Arminian Magazine
for 1 791, and concerning which Wesley writes : "I do not remember to
have ever seen a more strong and beautiful treatise on moral liberty than
the following ; which I, therefore, earnestly recommend to the considera-
tion of all those who desire 'to vindicate the ways of God with man.'"
2 Wesley's Works, vol. xiii., p. 157.
3 Dunn's Life of Clarke, p. 80.
IVesley oji Female Preaching. 645
John Booth was now assistant in Keighley circuit, and to 179^
him was addressed the following-. Age88
" London, Jammry 29, 1791.
" My dear Brother, — You give mc a very agreeable account of the
progress of the work of God in your circuit. As to the poor, self conceited
enthusiasts in Keighley, it seems best that you should never name them
in public ; but, when occasion offers, strike at the root of their errors, by
clearly proving the truth which they deny. And whenever you meet
with any of them in private, then speak and spare not. Whenever you
have opportunity of speaking to believers, urge them to go on to perfec-
tion. Spare no pains ; and God, even our own God, still give you His
blessing !
" I am, etc.,
" John Wesley." ^
IMiss Cambridge was an Irish Methodist, twenty-nine years
of age, and had established meetings in various parts of the
town of Bandon, at which she prayed and occasionally
exhorted. She had also held similar meetings at Kinsale,
Youghal, and other places. Many of the Methodists, and
some of the Methodist preachers, pronounced her public
addresses to be entirely irregular, and what ought not to be
tolerated in the Christian church. She wrote to Wesley for
advice ; and received the following reply, — Wesley's last
utterance on female preaching.
"London, January 31, 1791.
" My dear Sister, — I received your letter an hour ago. I thank you
for writing so largely and so freely ; do so always to me as your friend, as
one that loves you well. Mr. Barber has the glory of God at heart ; and
so have his fellow labourers. Give them all honour, and obey them in all
things as fapas conscience permits. But it will not permit you to be silent
when God commands you to speak ; yet, I would have you give as little
offence as possible ; and, therefore, I would advise you not to speak at
any place where a preacher is speaking at the same time, lest you should
draw away his hearers. Also, avoid the first appearance of pride or
magnifying yourself. If you want books, or anything, let me know ; I
have your happiness much at heart. During the little time I have to
stay on earth, pray for,
" Your affectionate brother,
, "John Wesley." 2
Ezekiel Cooper was the son of an officer in the army of
* Wesley's Works, vol. xiii., p. 146.
* Memoir of Miss A. Cambridge, p. 39.
646 Life a7id Times of Wesley,
1 79 1 the American revolution, and was now twenty-eight years of
Age 88 age, and a Methodist preacher at AnnapoHs. He was a man
of great mental vigour and versatility, almost unequalled in
debate, and was called, by the American Methodists, Lyairgus,
in reference to his profound wisdom. He was a diligent
student, and a close observer of men and things, lived a long
life of celibacy, was frugal to a fault, left behind him an estate
of about fifty thousand dollars, and died in 1847, the oldest
Methodist preacher in the world. When he entered the
ministry in 1783, the American Methodists numbered eighty-
three preachers, and fifteen thousand members ; when he
died, their ministry numbered five thousand, and their mem-
bership above a million.^ To him Wesley wrote the last
letter which he posted to America.
" Near London, February i, 1791.
" My DEAR Brother, — Those that desire to write, or to say anything,
to me, have no time to lose, for time has shaken me by the hand, and
death is not far behind. But I have reason to be thankful for the time
that is past. I felt few of the infirmities of old age, for fourscore and six
years. It was not till a year and a half ago, that my strength and my
sight failed. And still I am enabled to scrawl a little, and to creep,
though I cannot run. Probably I should not be able to do so much, did
not many of you assist mc by your prayers.
" I have given a distinct account of the work of God, which has been
wrought in Britain and Ireland, for more than half a century. We want
some of you to give us a connected relation, of what our Lord has been
doing in America, since the time that Richard Boardman accepted the
invitation, and left his country to serve you. See that you never give
place to one thought of separating from your brethren in Europe. Lose
no opportunity of declaring to all men, that the Methodists are one people
in all the world, and that it is their full determination so to continue, —
' Though mountains rise, and oceans roll,
To sever us in vain.'
" To the care of our common Lord I commit you, and am your affec-
tionate friend and brother,
"John Wesley." 2
Such was Wesley's dying legacy to the transatlantic
Methodists. ,
The next is brief, but full of interest. For many years
^ Sprague's " Annals of the American Methodist Pulpit."
^ Methodist Magazine, 1 804, p. 46.
Wesley s Last Lette7's. 647
Wesley had been accustomed to leave London, on, or about, 179^
the 1st of March, for what he was accustomed to call his Age 88
long journey, to the north, or to Ireland. Though so aged
and feeble, he fully intended to do the same again ; and
Henry Moore relates, that, in reference to this, he actually
sent his chaise and his horses before him to Bristol, and took
places for himself and his friends in the Bath coach ; but,
almost on the very day when he purposed to begin afresh his
" long journey" on earth, the venerable pilgrim left earth
for heaven.
" London, February 6, 1791.
" Dear Sir, — On Wednesday, March 17, I purpose, if God permit, to
come from Gloucester to Worcester; and, on Thursday, the i8th, to
Stourport. If our friends at Worcester are displeased, \vc cannot help it.
Wishing you and yours all happiness,
" I am, dear sir, your affectionate servant,
"John Wesley."
The letter was addressed to Mr. York, of Stourport ; but
was not sent. At the bottom of it is the last line that
Wesley ever wrote.
" February 28 — This morning I found this in my bureau." *
In a letter, given on page 622, Mr. Thomas Roberts was
directed, in an emergency, to leave Bristol for Haverford-
west circuit. He went, and had to encounter difficulties.
Wesley now wrote to him as follows.
" London, February 8, 1791.
" My dear Brother, — Who was it that opposed your reducing the
preachers, in the circuit, to two? and on what pretence ? We must needs
reduce all our expenses everywhere as far as possible. You must never
leave off till you carry this point, and constitute bands in each large
society. When the lecture begins at Carmarthen, it will then be time
enough to prevent any ill effects of it. I am glad to hear your journey
home has not been in vain. My best wishes attend my friends at Traison
and Langwair.
" I am, dear Tommy, yours, etc.,
"John Wesley."
The original, from which this is copied, was written by an
amanuensis, but is signed in Wesley's own tremulous hand-
writing.
1 Wesley's Works, vol. xiii., p. 147.
648 Life and Times of Wesley.
1791 We have already seen that Adam Clarke had been danger-
Age"88 ously ill in Dublin. In fact, it was reported in England that
he was dead ; and William Stevens actually preached his
funeral sermon in the isle of Jersey. He was now slowly
recovering, had entered himself a medical student in Trinity
college', Dublin, and had founded a "Strangers' Friend
Society," like those already instituted in London, and in
Bristol' To him Wesley now addressed the following.
"London, February 9, 1791.
" Dear Adam, — You have great reason to bless God for giving you
strength according to your day. He has indeed supported you in an
uncommon manner under these complicated afflictions. You may well
say, ' I will put my trust in Thee as long as I live.' I will desire Dr.
Whitehead thoroughly to consider your case, and to give us his thoughts
upon it. I am not afraid of your doing too little, but too much, I am in
continual danger of this. Do little at a time, that you may do the more.
IVIy love to sisters Cookman and Boyle, but it is a doubt with me whether
I shall cross the seas any more.
" What preacher was it who first omitted meeting the select society ? I
wonder it did not destroy the work !
" You have done right in setting up the strangers' society : it is an
excellent institution.
" I am quite at a loss concerning Mr. Maddan ; I know not what to
think of him. Send me your best thoughts concerning him.
" Let not the excluded preachers by any means creep in again. In any
wise, write, and send me your thoughts on animal maguctism. I set my
face against that device of Satan. Two of our preachers here are in
danger of that satanical delusion ; but, if they persist to defend it, I must
drop them. I know its principles full well.
" With much love to your wife, I am, etc.,
"John Wesley," 2
Wesley was quite ready to " cross seas," as he had already
done so often, in his Master's service ; but he might well
doubt his ability. Exactly three weeks after writing thus to
Adam Clarke, he crossed the dark river of de"a±h.
For sixty-five years, Wesley had been an earnest, la-
borious, self denying, and unceasing preacher of " the glorious
gospel of the blessed God"; and, notwithstanding his extreme
age and feebleness, he continued in his beloved employ until
' Everett's Life of Clarke.
2 Wesley an Times, June i, 1866.
Wesley s Last Week of Public Labour. 649
within seven days of his decease. The following was his last 1791
week of public labour. AgeSS
On Thursday, February 17, he preached at Lambeth, then
a thriving suburban village, from the text, " Labour not for
the meat which pcrisheth ; but for that which endureth to
everlasting life." Returning home, he seemed to be unwell,
and said he had taken cold.
Friday the i8th, he read and wrote as usual, dined at Mr.
Urling's, and preached at Chelsea, in the evening, from the
words, " The king's business requireth haste." Once or twice
he was obliged to stop, and to tell the people that his cold so
affected his voice as to prevent his speaking without these
necessary pauses. He had, as usual, arranged to meet the
classes for the renewal of their tickets ; but was persuaded to
leave this part of his work to his companions, James Rogers,
and Joseph Bradford.
Saturday, the 19th, was principally employed in reading
and writing. The following was addressed to Mrs. Susanna
Knapp, of Worcester, and shows his unquenchable Christian
ardour,
"\^0^T>0^, February 19, 1791.
" My dear Suky, — As the state of my health is exceeding wavering,
and waxes worse, I cannnot yet lay down any plans for my future journeys.
Indeed, I propose, if God permit, to set out for Bristol on the 28th instant ;
but how much further I shall be able to go, I cannot yet determine. If I
am pretty well, I hope to be at Worcester about the 22nd of March. To
find you and yours in health of body and mind will be a great pleasure to,
" My dear Suky, yours affectionately,
"J. Wesley."!
On the same day, Wesley went out to dinner, at Mrs.
Griffith's, Islington, and, while there, desired a friend to read
to him the fourth and three following chapters of the book of
Job, containing the speech of Eliphaz, and the answer of Job,
and strikingly appropriate to the case of a dying man. After
dinner, he purposed to meet the penitents at City Road, but
was prevailed on to allow Mr. Brackenbury to t^ke his place.
Next morning (Sunday) he rose, at his usual hour, but was
utterly unfit for the sabbath services. At seven o'clock, he
was obliged to lie down again ; and slept for above three
' Manuscript letter, kindly lent by Mr. Dimblcby of Malvern.
650 Life and Times of Wesley.
1791 hours. In the afternoon, he had again to go to bed; had
Age~88 another sleep ; and then, after two of his own sermons had
been read to him, came downstairs to supper.
On Monday, the 21st, he seemed better, and, despite
persuasion, would fulfil an engagement he had made to dine
at Twickenham. His niece. Miss Sarah Wesley, and Miss
Ritchie, went with him. On the way he called upon Lady
Mary Fitzgerald, and conversed and prayed most sweetly.
Tuesday, the 22nd, he proceeded with his usual work ;
dined at Mr, Plorton's, Islington ; and preached in City Road
chapel, from, " We through the Spirit wait for the hope of
righteousness by faith." After this, he met the leaders.
Wednesday, February 23, he arose at four a.m., as he also
did the day following, and, accompanied by Mr. Rogers, set
out to Leatherhead, eighteen miles from London, to visit a
magistrate, in whose dining room he preached, from "Seek ye
the Lord while He may be found ; call upon Him while He
is near." This was Wesley's last sermon.
Thursday, February 24, he spent with his old friend, Mr.
Wolff, at Balham, where he was cheerful, and seemed nearly
as well as usual.^
During the day, he wrote his last letter, which was
addressed to Wilberforce, who had brought before parliament
the question, which Wesley was one of the first to advocate,
the abolition of slavery.
" London, February 24, 1791.
" My dear Sir,— Unless the Divine Power has raised you up to be as
Athanasius, contra mimdum, I see not how you can go through your
glorious enterprise, in opposing that execrable villainy, which is the
scandal of religion, of England, and of human nature. Unless God
has raised you up for this very thing, you will be worn out by the opposi-
tion of men and devils ; but, if God be for you, who can be against
you ? Are all of them together stronger than God? 0\ ^be not weary
in well doing.' Go on, in the name of God, and in the power of His
might, till even American slavery, the vilest that ever saw the sun, shall
vanish away before it.
" Reading this morning a tract, wrote by a poor African, I was particu-
larly struck by that circumstance, — that a man who has a black skin,
being wronged or outraged by a white man, can have no redress; it being
* Life of James Rogers.
Aire 88
JVcsleys La si Lcikr. 65 1
a law, in our colonies, that the oaih of a black, against a white, goes for 1791
nothing. What villainy is this !
" That He who has guided you, from your youth up, may continue to
strengthen you in this and all things, is the prayer of, dear sir,
" Your affectionate servant,
"John Wesley."'
Friday, February 25, Mr. Wolff having brouglit him home,
to City Road, Wesley went upstairs, and requested that, for
half an hour, he should be left alone. When the time expired,
faithful Joseph Bradford found him so unwell, that he sent
for Dr. Whitehead. " Doctor,^' said the dying patriarch,
" they are more afraid than hurt."
Saturday, February 26, was principally passed in drowsiness
and sleep.
Sunday morning, February 27, he seemed better, got up,
sat in his chair, looked cheerful, and repeated, from one of his
brother's hymns, —
" Till glad I lay this body down,
Thy servant, Lord, attend !
And oh ! my life of mercy crown.
With a triumphant end !"
And then, soon after, with marked emphasis, he said, "Our
friend Lazarus sleepeth." His niece. Miss Wesley, and Miss
Ritchie prayed with him. " When at Bristol," said he, allud-
ing to his illness there in 1753, " my words were,
* I the chief of sinners am,
But Jesus died for me !' "
Miss Ritchie asked, " Is that your language now.?" "Yes,"
said he. "Christ is all! He is all!" He then dozed, and
sometimes wandered ; but, in his wanderings, was always
preaching or meeting classes.
On Monday, February 28, his weakness increased. Dr.
Whitehead wished for further assistance. Wesley replied :
" Dr. Whitehead knows my constitution better than any one.
I am quite satisfied, and will have no one clsc."^ Most of the
* Wilberforce's Life, vol. i., p. 297; and Moore's Life of Wesley, vol. ii.,
P- 437-
2 Jacob Jones, Esq., however, seems to have been called in. He was then
a young man, and had just joined the Methodists. He died, in Finsbury
Square, in 1830. — {Methodist AMagazi/w, 1830, p. 511.)
652 Life and Times of Wesley.
1 791 day was spent in sleep. He seldom spoke ; but, once, in a
Age 88 wakeful interval, was heard saying, in a low, distinct voice,
" There is no way into the holiest, but by the blood of Jesus."
Then referring to the text, " Ye know the grace of our Lord
Jesus Christ, that, though He was rich," etc., he remarked,
with solemn emphasis, " That is the foundation, the only
foundation, there is no other." It was now evident to all, that
he was beginning to sleep his last sleep. His friends were
intensely anxious and alarmed. Poor, broken hearted, Joseph
Bradford despatched notes to the preachers, asking their
prayers, in the following terms.
" February 27, I jgi.
" Dear Brother, — Mr. Wesley is very ill : pray ! pray ! pray !
" I am your affectionate brother,
"Joseph Bradford."^
All was unavailing. Wesley's work was ended. On
Tuesday, March i, after a restless night, being asked if he
suffered pain, he answered, " No," and began singing, —
" All glory to God in the sky,
And peace upon earth be restored !
O Jesus, exalted on high,
Appear our omnipotent Lord.
Who, meanly in Bethlehem born,
Didst stoop to redeem a lost race,
Once more to Thy people return,
And reign in Thy kingdom of grace.
Oh, wouldst Thou again be made known,
Again in the Spirit descend ;
And set up in each of Thy own
A kingdom that never shall end!
Thou only art able to bless.
And make the glad nations obey,
And bid the dire enmity cease.
And bow the whole world to Thy sway,"
Here, while breathing faith and universal benevolence, his
strength failed. " I want to write," said he. A pen was put
into his hand, and paper was placed before him. His hand
had forgot its cunning. " I cannot," said the dying man.
" Let me write for you," remarked Miss Ritchie : " tell me
' Smith's " History of Methodism," vol. i., p. 608.
JVesIeys Las I Son^ on Earth. 653
what you wish to say." "Nothing," he replied, "but that 1791
God is with us."
" I will get up,^' said he ; and, while his friends were
arranging his clothes, the happy old man again began
singing,—
" I 'II praise my Maker while I 've breath ;
And, when my voice is lost in death,
Praise shall employ my nobler powers :
My days of praise shall ne'er be past,
While life, and thought, and being last,
Or immortality endures.
Happy the man whose hopes rely
On Israel's God ; He made the sky,
And earth, and seas, with all their train ;
His truth for ever stands secuie,
He saves the' oppressed, He feeds the poor,
And none shall find His promise vain."
Once more seated in his chair, he, in a weak voice, said :
" Lord, Thou givest strength to those that can speak, and to
those that cannot. Speak, Lord, to all our hearts, and let
them know that Thou loosest tongues." And again he began
to sing, what proved to be his last song on earth :
" To Father, Son, and Holy Ghost,
Who sweetly all agree."
But here his voice failed, and, after gasping for breath, he
said: "Now w'e have done. Let us all go."
Full of happiness, but utterly exhausted, he was put to
bed, where, after a short but quiet sleep, he opened his eyes,
and, addressing the weeping watchers who stood around
him, said, " Pray, and praise!" and, of course, they at once
complied. Then he asked Joseph Bradford about the key
and contents of his bureau, remarking, " I would have all
things ready for my executors. Let me be buried in nothing
but what is woollen, and let my corpse be carried in my
coffin into the chapel." And then, as if no other earthly
matters required his attention, he again called out, " Pray and
praise ! " Down fell his friends upon their knees, and ferv^ent
were the dying patriarch's responses, especially to John
Broadbent's prayer, that God would still bless the system of
doctrine and discipline, which Wesley had been the means of
Age 88
654 Life and Times of Wesley.
^791 establishing-. On rising, from prayer, each watcher drew near
Age 88 to the bed of the expiring saint, and, with affectionate sohcit-
ude, awaited the coming of the shining ones to conduct him
home. With the utmost placidity, he saluted each one
present, shook hands, and said, "Farewell ! farewell!"
Conflict there was none. The scene was the peaceful
setting of a glorious sun, undisturbed by the slightest sough-
ing wind, undimmed by the smallest intervening cloud.
He tried to speak ; but his friends found it difficult to
make out what he meant, except that he wished his sermon
on " The Love of God to Fallen Man," founded on the text,
"Not as the offence, so also is the free gift," to be "scattered
abroad, and given to everybody."^ Seeing that those around
him were at a loss to understand -what he tried to say,
the grand old Christian gladiator paused ; and, summoning,
for a final effort, all the little strength he had remaining, he
exclaimed, in a tone well-nigh supernatural, " The best of all
is, God is with us!" And then, after another pause, and
while lifting his arm in grateful triumph, he emphatically
reiterated, " The best of all is, God is with us!"
Nature was once more exhausted. Some one wetted his
parched lips. " It will not do," said he ; " we must take the
consequence. Never mind the poor carcase."
James Rogers and Thomas Rankin Avere standing by
his bed ; but his sight was so nearly gone, that he was
unable to recognise their features. "Who are these.''" he
asked. " Sir," said Mr. Rogers, " we are come to rejoice with
you ; you are going to receive your crown." " It is the
Lord's doing," replied Wesley, " and it is marvellous in our
eyes."
Being told that his brother's widow had come to see him,
he thanked her, affectionately endeavoured to kiss her, and
remarked, " He giveth His servants rest." She wet his lips ;
on which he repeated his constant thanksgiving after meals :
"We thank Thee, O Lord, for these and all Thy mercies.
Bless the Church and king, and grant us truth and peace,
through Jesus Christ our Lord, for ever and ever!" Then,
Mn compliance with his wish, ten thousand copies were printed, and
gratuitously distributed. (Rogers' Life.)
Wesley s Death. 655
pausing a little, he cried, "The clouds drop fatness." After 1791
another pause, " The Lord of hosts is with us ; the God of ^^^88
Jacob is our refuge ! Pray and praise !" And again his friends
fell upon their knees.
During the night, he scores of times repeated the words,
" I'll praise. I'll praise!" but could say nothing more. Next
morning, Wednesday, March 2, Joseph Bradford prayed with
him. It was a few minutes before ten o'clock. Around the
bed there knelt his niece. Miss Sarah Wesley ; one of his
executors, Mr, Horton ; his medical attendant. Dr. White-
head ; his book steward, George Whitfield ; the present
occupants of his house, James and Hester Ann Rogers, and
their little boy ; and his friends and visitors, Robert Carr
Brackenbury, and Elizabeth Ritchie, — eleven persons alto-
gether. Bradford, so long Wesley's faithful friend and
travelling companion, was the mouthpiece of the other ten. '
"Farewell!" cried Wesley, — the last word he uttered; and
then, as Joseph Bradford was saying, " Lift up your heads, O
ye gates ; and be ye lift up, ye everlasting doors ; and this
heir of glory shall come in !" Wesley gathered up his feet in
the presence of his brethren ; and, without a groan and with-
out a sigh, was gone. He died about ten o'clock a.m., on
Wednesday, IVIarch 2, 1791.^
What followed .'' "Children ! " said John Wesley's mother,
"as soon as I am dead, sing a song of praise!" As soon as
Wesley himself died, his friends, standing about his corpse,
sang :
" Waiting to receive thy spirit,
Lo ! the Saviour stands above ;
Shows the purchase of His merit,
Reaches out the crown of love."
And then they knelt down, and prayed, that the mantle of the
ascended Elijah might rest upon his followers.^
Wesley's remains were interred, behind the chapel in City
Road, on the 9th of March. Such was the excitement created
by his death, that, within twelve hours only before the funeral
took place, it was determined, in order to prevent the
assembline of an inconvenient crowd, that the funereal
'James Rogers' Life. ^''^mhgntic Narrative," 1791.
656 Life and Times of Wesley.
1791 solemnities should be performed at the early hour of five a.m.
A^^S T^"^^ notice to his friends was short ; but hundreds attended ;
and to each one was given a biscuit, in an envelope, engraven
with a beautifully executed portrait of the departed, dressed
in canonicals, surmounted by a halo and a crown.
Much remains unsaid ; but our space is gone. Whilst
the present pages are passing through the press, we learn,
that " a most eligible site, in Westminster Abbey, has been
courteously offered," by the dean of that noble edifice, for
the erection of a " public monument " to Wesley and his
brother Charles ; and that arrangements are being made to
secure the services of " a first class sculptor," at the cost of
about iJ^Soo. Thus the wheel turns round. One hundred and
thirty years ago, W^esley was shut out of every church in
England ; now marble medallion profiles of himself and his
' brother, accompanied with suitable inscriptions, are deemed
deserving of a niche in England's grandest cathedral. The
man who, a century since, was the best abused man in the
British isles, is now hardly ever mentioned but with affec-
tionate respect. In the literature of the age ; in its lectures
and debates ; in chapels and in churches ; in synods, con-
gresses, and all sorts of conferences ; by the highest lords
and the most illustrious commoners, the once persecuted
Methodist is now extolled ; and the judgment of Southey,
in a letter to Wilberforce, is tacitly confirmed : " I consider
Wesley as the most influential mind of the last century,
— the man who will have produced the greatest effects,
centuries, or perhaps millenniums hence, if the present race of
men should continue so long."
In person, Wesley was rather below the middle size, but
beautifully proportioned, without an atom of superfluous
flesh, yet muscular and strong ; with a forehead clear and
smooth, a bright, penetrating eye, and a lovely face, which
retained the freshness of its complexion to the latest period of
his life.
In general scholarship and knowledge, he had few
superiors ; whilst such was his acquaintance with the New
Testament, that, when at a loss to repeat a text in the words
of the authorised translation, he was never at a loss to quote
it in the original Greek.
AtUJiorsJiip and Preaching. 657
As an author, the chief characteristics of his style arc I79i
brevity, perspicuity, and strength. He abhorred verboseness, Age 88
and constantly endeavoured to say everything in the feuest
words possible. " I never think," said he, " of my style at all,
but just set down the words that come first Only when I
transcribe anything for the press, then I think it my duty to
see that every phrase be clear, pure, proper, and easy. Con-
ciseness, which is now as it were natural to me, brings quantum
sufficit of strength." Not for want of genius, but for want of
time, and for want of disposition to make it otherwise, his
style is one of naked and self dependent strength, unaccom-
panied with gaudy colouring, and equally undiluted with the
pretentious puerilities of weak and little minds. It is impossi-
ble to abridge his writings without omitting thoughts as well
as words. Who can abridge Euclid's Elements without
maiming them .'' And who can take from the works of
Wesley without reducing their specific gravity .'*
In the pulpit, Wesley's attitude was graceful and easy ; his
action calm, natural, pleasing, and expressive ; and his voice,
not loud, but clear and manly. Whitefield was the greater
orator ; Wesley the better divine. Wesley's preaching was
without Whitefield's Demosthenic eloquence ; but it had the
accuracy of a scholar, the authority of an ambassador, the
unction of a saint, the power of God. It was always search-
ing ; but not often terrible and severe, except when addressed
to congregations rich, respectable, and polite. " Sir," said a
friend to him, after he had preached to a genteel audience
from the words, " Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how
can ye escape the damnation of hell .'*" " Sir," said Wesley's
off"ended hearer, " such a sermon would have been suitable in
Billingsgate; but it was highly improper here"; to whom
Wesley quietly, but significantly, remarked: "If I had been hi
Billingsgate, my text should have been, ' Behold the Lamb of
God, which taketh away the sin of the world.' " The poor
need to be told the terribleness of their danger, and the rich
more ; but, unfortunately, the poor hear most of this, and the
rich least. Wesley was a faithful minister to both.
In social life, Wesley was a Christian gentleman, and, with
perfect ease, accommodated himself to both the high and low,
the rich and poor. Placid, benevolent, and full of anecdote,
VOL. Ill U U
658 Life and Times of Wesley.
1 791 wit, and wisdom, his conversation was not often equalled; and
AeeSS was generally concluded with two or three verses of a hymn,
applicable to what had just been spoken. Though never
trifling, he was always cheerful ; sometimes saying, " I dare
no more fret than citrsc or swear." His sprightliness among
his friends never left him ; but was as conspicuous at eighty-
seven as at seventeen. He was at home in mansions, and
equally in cottages ; courteous to all, and especially to the
young, often remarking, " I reverence the young, because
they may be useful after I am dead."
Of his piety nothing need be said. " His modesty," writes
Bradburn, "prevented him saying much concerning his own
religious feelings. In public, he hardly ever spoke of the
state of his own soul ; but, in 1781, he told me that his
experience might almost at any time be expressed in the
following lines :
* O Thou, who earnest from above,
The pure celestial fire to' impart,
Kindle a flame of sacred love
On the mean altar of my heart !
There let it for Thy glory burn,
With inextinguishable blaze,
And trembling to its source return,
In humble love and fervent praise!'"
His industry is almost without a parallel. In many things,
he was gentle and easy to be entreated ; but, in his earnest-
ness in redeeming time, he was decisive and inexorable. While
kept waiting for his carriage, on one occasion, he passionately
exclaimed, " I have lost ten minutes for ever ! '' " You have
no need to be in a hurry ! " said a friend : " Hurry," he replied,
" I have no time to be in a hurry." It has been calculated,
that, during the fifty years of his itinerant ministry, he travel-
led a quarter of a million of miles, and preached more than
forty thousand sermons. In these volumes, we have seen
him rising with the lark, travelling with the sun, preaching
throughout the three kingdoms, and always acting in har-
mony with his own well known utterance, " The world is my
parish ! " Looking at his travelling, the marvel is how he
found time to write ; and, looking at his books, the marvel is
how he found time to preach. His hands were always full ;
Wit. 659
but his action was never' fluttered. He was always moving, 1791
and yet, in the midst of his ceaseless toils, betraying no more AgeS8
bustle than a planet in its course. His mission was too great
to allow time for trifles.
Was Wesley without faults ? Not so ; no man but " the
Man Christ Jesus " ever was. Wesley, for instance, was
naturally irritable ; but even that was better than being
apathetic. " Tommy," said Wesley once, " touch that ! "
pointing to a dock. The itinerant did so. "Do you feel
anything .-* " asked Wesley. " No," replied his friend.
"Touch that ! " continued Wesley, pointing to a nettle. His
companion obeyed, and, in consequence, was stung. " Now,
Tommy," remarked Wesley, " some men are like docks ; say
what you will to them, they are stupid and insensible.
Others are like nettles ; touch them, and they resent it.
Tommy, you are a nettle ; and, for my part, I would rather
have to do with a nettle than a dock."
Numberless instances of Wesley's wit and repartee might
easily be given. " Stop that man from speaking ! " exclaimed
Charles Wesley at one of the early conferences, when a
preacher rose up, and, full of the love of Christ and irrepressible
emotion, began to relate his religious experience. "Stop
that man from speaking ! " said Charles ; " let us attend to
business ! " but still the good man proceeded. " Unless he
stops, I '11 leave the conference," continued Charles. Wesley
himself, revelling in the itinerant's religious recital, effectu-
ally cooled the warmth of his brother's temper by quietly
remarking, " Reach him his hat ! "
On another occasion, when about to dine with a rich
Methodist, one of his preachers, who was present, with more
piety than politeness, cried out : " O sir, what a sumptuous
dinner ! Things are very diftcrent to what they were form-
erly 1 There is now but little self denial amongst the
Methodists ! " Wesley pointed to the abundantly furnished
table, and then silenced the preacher's untimely eloquence
by saying, "My brother, there is a fine opportunity for self
denial now."
Thus was Wesley always "instant in season, and out of
season." Always and everywhere he was ready to turn
passing incidents to practical account. " Pray, sir, let us go,"
66o Life and Times of Wesley.
1791 said one of his friends, whilst two women, near BilHngsgate
Age 88 market, were quarrelhng most furiously, and using language
far more forceful than pious : " Pray, sir, let us go ; I cannot
stand it." " Stay, Sammy," replied Wesley, as he looked at
the viragoes, who were evidently inspired, though not from
heaven. " Stay, Sammy," answered the man who had eyes
for everything ; " stay, and learn how to preach ! "
We must close. Taking him altogether, Wesley is a man
sid generis. He stands alone : he has had no successor ; no
one like him went before ; no contemporary was a coequal.
There was a wholeness about the man, such as is rarely seen.
His physique, his genius, his wit, his penetration, his judg-
ment, his memory, his beneficence, his religion, his diligence,
his conversation, his courteousness, his manners, and his dress,
— made him as perfect as we ever expect man to be on
this side heaven. " A greater poet may rise than Homer or
Milton," writes Dr. Dobbin, "a greater theologian than
Calvin, a greater philosopher than Bacon, a greater drama-
tist than any of ancient or modern fame ; but a more
distinguished revivalist of the churches than John Wesley,
never." " He was a man," says Lord Macaulay, " whose
eloquence and logical acuteness might have rendered him
eminent in literature ; whose genius for government was
not inferior to that of Richelieu ; and who devoted all his
powers, in defiance of obloquy and derision, to what he
sincerely considered the highest good of his species."
But, in the case of a man like Wesley, panegyric is out
of place. He is one of the very few, whose memory can
afford to do without it. His well won and world wide fame
requires no inscription on his moijj^mcntal marble, — whether
in England or in America, in Westminster or in Washington,
' — more elaborate than this :
JOHN WESLEY,
Born, a.S. 1703.
Bitti, a.S. 1791.
APPENDIX.
[As some American Methodists have expressed dissatisfaction with Mr. Tyer-
man's views (vol. iii., p. i^zbet srcj.) of Wesley's ordination of Coke and organization
of the Methodist Episcopal Church, the following exhaustive review of the ques-
tion is cited from Dr. Abel Stevens's History of Alethodism, vol. ii., p. 209 et scq.
It is another of the great providential facts of Wesley's history
that the same year which gave a constitutional security to Meth-
odism in Great Britain was signalized by its episcopal organization
in America, a measure which, by its consequences, may well be
ranked among the most important events of Wesley's important
life. Here again did he follow, with simple wisdom, the guidance
of that divine Providence, the recognition of which in the affairs of
men, and especially in the affairs of the Church, was the crowning
maxim of his philosophy and the crowning fact of his policy. He
had been providentially preparing for this new and momentous ex-
igency by that gradual development of his personal opinions which
we have already traced. Bigoted even, as a High-Churchman, at
tlie beginning of his career, we have seen him, year after year, attain-
ing more liberal views of ecclesiastical policy. Nearly forty years
before his ordinations for America, he had, after reading Lord King's
"Primitive Church," renounced the opinion that a distinction of or-
der, rather than of office, existed between bishops and presbyters.^
Fifteen years later he denied the necessity, though not the expedi-
ency, of episcopal ordination. Bishop Stillingfleet had convinced
him that it was " an entire mistake that none but episcopal ordina-
tion was valid."- Henceforth he held that presbyters and bishops,
identical in order, differing only in office, had essentially the same
right of ordination. It was not possible for a man like Wesley,
keen, quick, fearless, and candid, to remain long in any ecclesiastical
prejudice now that he was*on this track of progressive opinions.
He soon broke away from all other regard for questions of Church
government than that of Scriptural expediency ; and as early as
1756, when in his maturest intellectual vigor, he declares : "As to
my own judgment, I still believe ' the episcopal form of Church gov-
* History of Methodism, vol. i., book iii., chap v. The persistent misrepresen-
tations of him on this point are astonishing. The Rev. Edwin .Sidney (Life of
Walker, of Truro, p. 260) says that "when he wanted ordained preachers for
America, he, of a sudden, /;/ his old a^c, found out, by reading Lord King's Ac-
count of the Primitive Church, that bishops and presbyters are of the same or-
der." This inexcusable violation of historical truth is common in the writings of
Churchmen against Methodism.
^ A Letter to a Friend, Works, vol. vii., p. 301.
662 Appendix.
ernment to be Scriptural and apostolical' — I mean, well agreeing
with the practice and writings of the apostles ; but that it is pre-
scribed in Scripture I do not believe. This opinion, which I once
zealously espoused, I have been heartily ashamed of ever since I
read Bishop Stillingfleet's * Irenicon.' I think he has unanswera-
bly proved that ' neither Christ nor his apostles prescribe any par-
ticular form of Church government, and that the plea of divine
right for diocesan episcopacy was never heard of in the primitive
Church.' "•
It was, then, by no new assumption in his old age — in his imbe-
cility, as some of his critics allege, that he now met the necessities
of American Methodism by ordaining men to provide for them.
His keenest-eyed associates could as yet detect no declension of
his faculties; and if they could, still his course in this case was in
accordance with the reasonings of his best days, and he but repeats
his long-established opinions when he now asserts, " I firmly believe
I am a Scriptural episcopos as much as any man in England, for the
uninterrupted succession I know to be a fable, which no man ever
did or can prove. "'-
Methodism had spread rapidly in America, notwithstanding the
war of the Revolution. It now comprised eighty-three traveling
preachers, besides some hundreds of local preachers, and about fif-
teen thousand members and many thousands of hearers, and its ec-
clesiastical plans were extending a network of powerful agencies
over the country. The Revolution had not only dissolved the civil,
but also the ecclesiastical relations of the colonies to England.
Many of the English clergy, on whom the Methodist societies had
depended for the sacraments, had fled from the land, or had entered
political or military life, and the Episcopal Church had been gener-
ally disabled. In Virginia, the centre of its colonial strength, it had
rapidly declined, morally as well as numerically. At the Declara-
tion of Independence it included not more than one third of the
population of that province.^ At the beginning of the war the sixty-
one counties of Virginia contained ninety-five parishes, one hundred
and sixty-four churches, and ninety-one clergymen. At the conclu-
sion of the contest many of her churches were in ruins, nearly a
fourth of her parishes " extinct or forsaken," and thirty-four of the
remaining seventy-two were without pastoral supplies ; twenty-eight
only of her ninety-one clerg}-men remained, and these, with an addi-
tion, soon after the war, of eight from other parts of the country,
ministered in but thirty-six parishes.* In the year in which Wesley
ordained an American Methodist bishop, " memorials" to the Vir-
* Letter to Rev. Mr. Clark, Works, vol. vii., p. 284-
= "On the Church," Works, vol. vii., p. 312.
' Burk's History of Virginia, vol. ii., p. 180. Hawks (Contributions to the Ec-
clesiastical History of the United States of America, vol. i., chap, ix.) doubts
Burk's estimate. Dr. Hawks's volume needs important emendations, especially
m respect to Methodism.
* Hawks's " Contributions," vol. i., chap. .\.
Appendix. 663
ginia Legislature for the incorporation of the " Protestant Episcopal
Church in Virginia," and for other advantages to religion, were met
by counter petitions that " no step might be taken in aid of religion,
but that it might be left to its own superior and successful influ-
ence.'" The memorials were postponed till the next session, and
then rejected ; but a bill for the " incorporation of all religious so-
cieties which may apply for the same" was adopted. In other parts
of the country the English Church never had been numerically
strong, and its existence was now precarious, except in two or three
large cities.
Under these circumstances the Methodists demanded of their
preachers the administration of the sacraments. Many of the soci-
eties had been months, some of them years, without them. The
demand was not only urgent, it was logically valid, but by the ma-
jority of the preachers it was not deemed expedient. The prudent
delay which Wesley, notwithstanding his liberal ecclesiastical prin-
ciples, had practiced in England, aftbrded a lesson which their good
sense could not disregard. They exhorted their people, therefore,
to wait patiently till he could be consulted. Thomas Rankin, one
of Wesley's missionaries, presiding at the Conference of Deer Creek,
Maryland, 1777, induced them to delay one year. At the next ses-
sion the subject was again prudently postponed, as no English
preacher was present, Rankin having returned to England, and As-
bury being absent and sick. In 1779 the question occasioned a
virtual schism, the preachers of the South being resolute for the ad-
ministration of the sacraments, those of the North still pleading for
patient delay. The latter met in Conference at Judge White's resi-
dence, the retreat of Asbury, in Delaware ; the former at Brocken-
back Church, Fluvanna County, Virginia, where they made their
own appointments, and proceeded to ordain themselves by the
hands of three of their senior members, unwilling that their people
should longer be denied their right to the Lord's Supper, and their
children and probationary members the rite of baptism. At the
session of 1780 Asbury was authorized to visit the Southern preach-
ers, and, if possible, conciliate them. He met them in Conference ;
they appeared determined not to recede, but at last consented to
suspend the administration of the sacraments till further advice
could be received from Wesley. The breach was thus happily re-
paired, but must evidently soon again be opened if redress should
not be obtained. 2
What could Wesley do under these circumstances ? \Miat but
exercise the right of ordination which he had for years theoretic-
ally claimed, but practically and prudently declined ? He had im-
portuned "the authorities of the English Church in behalf of the
Americans. In this very year he had written two letters to Lowth,
Bishop of London, imploring ordination for a single preacher, who
* Journals of the Virginia Assembly, 1784.
* Bangs's Hist. M.E. Church, vol. i., pp. 135-7.
664 Appendix.
might appease the urgency of the American brethren by traveling
among them as a presbyter, and by giving them the sacraments ;
but the request was denied, Lowth replying that " there are three
ministers in that country already." "What are these," rejoined
Wesley, " to watch over all that extensive country ? I mourn for
poor America, for the sheep scattered up and down therein — part
of them have no shepherds at all, and the case of the rest is little
better, for their shepherds pity them not."^ If there was any im-
prudence on the part of Wesley in this emergency, it was certainly
in his long-continued patience, for he delayed yet nearly four years.
When he yielded, it was only after the triumph of the American
arms and the acknowledged independence of the colonies ; and not
then till urged to it by his most revered counselors. Fletcher, of
Madeley, was one of these. That good man's interest for Ameri-
can Methodism should endear his memory to the American Church.
He had thoughts at one time of going to the New ^^'o^ld and of
giving himself to its struggling societies, but his feeble health for-
bade him.
Fletcher was present with Wesley and Coke at the Leeds Con-
ference of 1784, and there, with his assistance,^ the question was
brought to an issue. Wesley had previously consulted with Coke
respecting it. He represented to Coke that as the Revolution had
separated the United States from the mother country, and the Epis-
copal Establishment was utterly abolished in the States, it became
his duty, as providentially at the head of the Methodist societies, to
obey their demand and furnish for them the means of grace. He
referred to the example of the Alexandrian Church, which, at the
death of its bishops, provided their successors through ordination
by its presbyters — a historical fact exemplified during two hundred
years. Recognized as their foimder by the American Methodists,
required by them to provide for their new necessities, and unable
to induce the English prelates to do so, he proposed to appoint Coke,
that he might go to the American societies as their superintendent
or bishop, ordain their preachers, and thus afford them the sacra-
ments with the least possible irregularity. Coke hesitated, but in
two months wrote to Wesley accepting the office.^ Accordingl}-,
accompanied by Rev. James Creighton, a presbyter of the Church
of England, Coke met him at Bristol, and on the second of Septem-
ber, 1784, was ordained superintendent or bishop of the Methodist so-
cieties in America, an act of as high propriety and dignity as it was
of urgent necessity. Richard Whatcoat and Thomas Vasey were
at the same time ordained presbyters ; and on the third of Novem-
ber, attended by his two presbyters (the number necessary to as-
sist a bishop in ordination, according to the usages of the English
Church), Coke arrived in the Republic, and proceeded to ordain
Francis Asbury, first as a deacon, then as a presbyter, and finally
' Works, vol. vii., p. 231.
^ Coke's Letter to Wesley, Smith's History of Wesleyan Methodism, vol. i.,
book ii., chap. 6. =* Drew's Life of Coke, chap. 5.
Appendix. 665
as a bishop, and to settle the organization of American Methodism,
one of the most important ecclesiastical events (whether for good
or evil) of the eighteenth century, or indeed since the Reformation,
as its historical consequences attest.
The Colonial English Church being dissolved by the Revolution,
its dwindled fragments were yet floating, as had been the Methodist
societies, on the stormy tide of events. Methodism preceded it in
reorganization. The Methodist bishops were the first Protestant
bishops, and Methodism was the first Protestant Episcopal Church
of the New World ;i and as Wesley had given it the Anglican Arti-
cles of Religion (omitting the seventeenth, on Predestination), and
the Liturgy, wisely abridged, it became, both by its precedent organ-
ization and its subsequent numerical importance, the real successor
to the Anglican Church in America.
Of course this extraordinary but necessary measure met with op-
position from Charles Wesley. He still retained his High-Church
opinions ; he denounced the ordinations as schism ; with his usual
haste he predicted that Coke would return from " his Methodist
Episcopal Church in Baltimore" to "make us all Dissenters here."
The poet was no legislator ; he became pathetic in his remonstran-
ces to his brother; "alas!" he wrote, "what trouble are you pre-
paring for yourself, as well as for me, and for your oldest, truest,
best friends ! Before you have quite broken down the bridge, stop
and consider ! If your sons have no regard for you, have some for
yourself Go to your grave in peace ; at least suffer me to go first,
before this ruin is under your hand." He did soon after go to his
grave in peace, except the alarms of his imaginary fears, and the
only evidence of the predicted " ruin" is seen to-day in the preva-
lent and permanent success of Methodism in both hemispheres.
The next year after the ordination of Coke, Wesley records in his
Journal : " I was now^ considering how strangely the grain of mus-
tard-seed, planted about fifty years ago, had grown up. It spread
through all Great Britain and Irelatid, the Isle of Wight, and the
Isle of Man ; then to America, through the whole continent, into
Canada, the Leeward Islands, and Newfoundland. And the socie-
ties in all these parts walk by one rule, knowing religion is holy
tempers, and striving to worship God, not in form only, but likewise
in spirit and in truth." His policy becomes more and more lib-
eral as he now finds it necessary to fortify his cause before his ap-
proaching death. The following year (1786) he ordained six or
seven more preachers, sending some to Scotland, and others to the
West Indies,- but he ordained none as yet for England, where he
and his clerical friends could partially supply the sacraments.
Three years later he ordained Mather, Rankin, and Moore.^ About
' Unless the Moravians arc to be considered an exception,
^ Jackson's Charles Wesley, chap. 26.
^ "To administer the sacraments of baptism and the Lord's Supper according
to the usages of the Church of England," says the certificate of ordination (see it
in Life of Henry Moore, p. 134, Am. cd.) ; and yet a living Churchman (Dr. Pu-
666 Appendix.
a score of lay preachers received ordination from his hands, and for
no other purpose but that they might administer the sacraments in
cases of necessity.
Thus did providential events give shape and security to Method-
ism, as its aged leader approached his end.
No act of Wesley's public life has been more misrepresented, if
not misunderstood, than his ordination of Coke, and the consequent
episcopal organization of his American societies. Churchmen, so
called, have especially insisted that he did not design to confer upon
Coke the character of a bishop ; that Coke's new office was design-
ed to be a species of supervisory appointment, vague and contin-
gent— something widely different from episcopacy, however difficult
to define ; and that, therefore, the distinct existence of American
Methodism, as an episcopal Church, is a fact contrary to the inten-
tion of Wesley.
No extant forensic argument, founded upon documentary evi-
dence, is stronger than would be a right collocation of the evidence
which sustains the claim of American Methodism respecting this
question. All Methodist authorities, British as well as American,
support that claim ; its proofs have been more or less cited again
and again, but they have not usually been drawn out in detail. Pre-
sented in their right series, they become absolutely decisive, and
must conclude the controversy with all candid minds. It is appro-
priate, at this point of our narrative, to review the argument. In
stating the facts which compose it, in their successive relations one
to another, some repetition will be necessary ; but the highest logic
— mathematical demonstration itself — is that in which not only the
postulates, but the successive i^roofs most often recur to strengthen
the advancing demonstration.
It has been seen that, as before the American Revolution the two
countries were under one government, the two Methodist bodies
were also. Wesley's " Minutes" were the discipline of the Ameri-
can as well as the British Methodists ; and Asbury represented his
person in America, vested w'ith much greater powers than have since
belonged to the American Methodist bishops. Thus was the Amer-
ican Church governed for years by the paternal direction of Wesley.
It has been further shown that, as none of the American preachers
were ordained, the societies were dependent for the sacraments upon
the clergy of the English Church in the colonies ; that at the Revo-
lution most of these left the country, and the, Methodists were there-
by deprived of those means of grace ; that many societies insisted
sey's Letter to the Bishop of Oxford, p. 151) says that " Wesley reluctantly took
the step of ordaining at all ;" and that " to the last he refused, in the strongest
terms, his consent that those thus ordained should take upon them to administer the
sacraments. He felt that it exceeded his powers, and so inhiljited it, however it
might diminish the numbers of the society he had formed." The biographers of
Wilberforce (vol. i., p. 248) also say : " Nor were any of his preachers suffered
during his lifetijne to attempt to administer the sacraments of his Church.''^ It is
high time that such fictions should cease among English Churchmen. It seems
that they have yet to learn how thorough and noble a heretic Wesley really was.
Appendix. 667
upon having them without ordination ; that a general strife ensued,
and a large portion ot" the Southern societies revolted ; that a com-
promise was effected until they could apply to Wesley for powers to
ordain and to administer the sacraments ; and that, in meeting their
demand, he ordained and sent over Dr. Coke, with episcopal pow-
ers, under the name of superintendent, to ordain Francis Asbury a
"joint superintendent," and to ordain the preachers to the offices of
deacons and elders. He sent also a printed liturgy, or " Sunday
Service," containing, besides the usual prayers, forms for " ordaining
superintendents, elders, and deacons," the ".Articles of Religion,"
and "A Collection of Psalms and Hymns." Coke also bore from
him a circular letter to the societies, stating reasons for the new
measures, the chief one being the demand of the American societies.
"When Coke arrived, the preachers assembled in Baltimore to receive
him and the new arrangements borne by him from ^Vesley. The
adoption of the provisions thus made by Wesley, at the request of
" some thousands of the inhabitants of these states," is what is call-
ed the " organization" of the Methodist Episcopal Church. The
" Minutes," which had before been the law of the Church, were con-
tinued, with such additions as were required by these new arrange-
ments. There was no revolution of the Church polity, and no new
powers were imparted to Asbury, except authority to ordain. Ev-
ery thing proceeded as before, except that the American societies
no longer depended upon the Church of England for the sacraments,
but received them from their own preachers. Thus, then, it appears
that the so-called "organization" of the Methodist Episcopal Church
at Baltimore was simply and substantially the adoption of the sys-
tem appointed by Wesley. In respect to the very term " episcopal"
itself, the Conference of Baltimore said, in their " Minutes" of the
so-called organization, that, " following the counsel of Mr. John
Wesley, who recommended the cpisc'opal mode of Church government,
we thought it best to become an episcopal Church."^ The Minutes
containing this declaration were, six months afterward, in the hands
of Wesley, and were published in England without a word of disap-
probation from him ; and when Coke was attacked in an English
pamphlet for his proceedings at Baltimore, he publicly defended
himself by declaring that he had " done nothing without the direc-
tion of Mr. Wesley." This he did in a publication, under the eye
of Wesley.2
It should be frankly admitted, however, that Wesley, while he es-
tablished the American episcopacy, did not approve the use of the
title of " bishop," because of the adventitious dignities associated
with it. But let it be borne in mind that the American societies
had been in existence nearly four years under the express title of
an "Episcopal Church," with the uninterrupted approbation of Wes-
* Minutes of 1785, in Minutes of the Annual Conference of the M. E. Church,
vol. i., p. 22. New York, 1840.
= Drew's Life of Coke, chap. 6. Ilis assailant is supposed to have been Charles
Wesley. Etheredge's Coke, book ii., chap. 7.
668 Appendix.
ley, before the name bishop was personally applied to their superin-
tendents.^ Not till this term was so applied did he demur. He
then wrote a letter to Bishop Asbury objecting strongly to his being
" called a bishop." And it is on this letter, more than any thing
else, that the opponents of Methodism have founded their allegation
that Wesley did not design to establish the American Methodist
episcopacy, but that Coke and the Baltimore Conference exceeded
his intentions in assuming it. Quotations from this letter have been
incessantly given in a form adapted only to produce a false effect,
for the letter can be rightly comprehended only by the aid of the
historical facts of the case.
Did Wesley, then, design, by his ordination of Coke, to confer on
him the office of a bishop, and to constitute the American Methodist
societies an episcopal Church ? Three things are to be assumed as
preliminary to this inquiry :
1. That Wesley was a decided Episcopalian. What man was
ever more attached to the national episcopacy of England ? We
have already cited proofs that he believed the " episcopal form of
Church government to be Scriptural and apostolical," that is, "well
agreeing with the practice and writings of the apostles," though that
it is prescribed in Scripture he did not believe.
2. That Wesley, while he believed in episcopacy, belonged to that
class of Episcopalians who contend that episcopacy is not a dis-
tinct "order" (in the usual technical or ecclesiastical sense of the
term), but a distinct office in the ministry ; that bishops and pres-
byters, or elders, are of the same order, and have essentially the
same prerogatives ; but that, for convenience, some of this order
may be raised to the episcopal office, and some of the functions
originally pertaining to the whole order, as ordination, for example,
may be confined to them ; the presbyter thus elevated being but
primus inter pares — the first among equals — a presiding officer.-
3. That the words episcopos (Greek), superintendent (Latin), and
bishop (English)^ have the same meaning, namely, an overseer.
With these preliminaries, we recur to the questions, Did Wesley
appoint Coke to the episcopal office ? Did he establish the Amer-
ican Methodist episcopacy ? Let us look at the evidence.
1 It had been used, however, all this time, in the Minutes, as explanatory of the
word "superintendent." The Minutes say that, " following the counsel of Mr.
John Wesley, who recommended the episcopal mode of Church government, we
thought it best to become an episcopal Church, making the episcopal office elect-
ive, and the elected superintendent, or bishop, amenable to the body of ministers
and preachers." Minutes, vol. i., p. 22. New York, 1840. It was not in the bish-
ops' address to Washington in 1789 that the title was ^x%t personally assumed.
The Discipline of 1787 so used it. Emory's History of the Discipline, p. 82.
But, as we have just seen, the tide was inserted in the Minutes of the Organiza-
tion of the Church (1784, 1785) as synonymous with "superintendent." Minutes
1785, vol. i., p. 22. Wesley's letter of reproof to Asbury was written before the
bishops' address to Washington.
^ See his circular letter to the American Societies, Drew's Coke, chap. 5.
^ Bishop (Saxon, bischop) is a corruption of the Latinized Greek word episco-
pus. Its analogy to the second and third syllables of the latter is obvious.
Appendix. 669
1. Wesley mentions, in Coke's certificate of ordination, as a rea-
son for ordaining him, that the Methodists in America desired " still
to adhere to the doctrine and discipline of the Church of En-
gland."^ That Church in America was dissolved by the Revolution ;
he therefore appointed Coke, with an episcopal form of government,
a ritual, and articles of religion, to meet the exigency. If Coke was
appointed merely to some such indefinite and contingent supervi-
sory office as " Church" writers allege, if he possessed not the au-
thoritative functions of episcopacy, wherein did his appointment
answer the purpose mentioned by Wesley — "the discipline of the
Church of England ?" Wherein consists the main feature of the dis-
cipline of the English Church ? In its episcopal superintendence.
Wherein does American Methodism resemble it? Certainly not in
class-meetings, itinerancy, and other characteristic peculiarities, but
in its episcopal regimen. Wesley's lai\guage is without sense if this
is not its meaning.
2. Why did Wesley attach so much importance to the appoint-
ment if it was of the secondary character alleged ? He says in his
circular letter respecting Coke's ordination, " For many years I
have been importuned, from time to time, to exercise this right by
ordaining part of our traveling preachers ; but I have still refused,
not only for peace' sake, but because I was determined as little as
possible to violate the established order of the national Church to
which I belonged. But the case is widely different between En-
gland and America. Here there are bishops who have a legal ju-
risdiction. In America there are none, neither any parish minis-
ters, so that for some hundred miles together there are none either
to baptize or administer the sacrament. Here, therefore, my scru-
ples are at an end !"
Scruples ! What could have been his " scruples" about sending
Coke on such a secondary errand as the opponents of the Method-
ist episcopacy assert .'' He had already sent Asbury and others to
America, and to Asbury he had actually assigned such a special yet
secondary office, but unaccompanied with the ordination and au-
thority of episcopacy. This he had done years before, without any
scruple whatever ; but during all this time he had been scrupling
about this new and solemn measure, till the Revolution relieved
him by abolishing the jurisdiction of the English bishops in the
colonies. There is certainly sheer absurdity in all this if Wesley
merely gave to Coke and Asbury a sort of indefinite though special
commission in the American Church, not including in it the dis-
tinctive functions of episcopacy. We can conceive of nothing in
the nature of such a commission to excite such scruples — a com-
mission which had long since been given to Asbury.
Again : When Wesley proposed to Coke his ordination to this new
office, some six or seven months before it was conferred. Coke "was
startled at a measure so unprecedented in modern days," and doubt
' I")ie\v's Life of Coke, chap. 5.
670 Appe7idix.
ed Wesley's authority to ordain him, as Wesley himself was not a
bishop.^ Wesley recommended him to read Lord King's Primitive
Church, and gave him time to reflect. Coke passed two months in
Scotland, and, on satisfying his doubts, wrote to Wesley accepting
the appointment, and was afterward ordained, with solemn forms
and the imposition of hands, by Wesley, assisted by presbyters of
the Church of England. What could have possibly been the per-
tinency of all these former scruples of Wesley, this surprise, and
doubt, and delay of Coke, this reference to ecclesiastical antiquity,
and to a book which demonstrates the right of presbyters to ordain
bishops in given cases, and these solemn forms, if they related mere-
ly to the alleged species of appointment, especially as this very
species of commission had already existed for some years in the
person of Asbury ?
3. It is evident, beyond all question, that Wesley did not consider
this solemn act in the subordinate sense of an appointment, but as
an "ordination," using the word in its strictest ecclesiastical appli-
cation. In his circular letter he says, " For many years I have been
importuned ... to exercise this right by ordaining a part of our
traveling preachers ; but I have still refused . . . because I was de-
termined as little as possible to violate the established order of the
national Church. . . . Here my scruples are at an end." Here the
word ordaining is expressly used ; and if the new appointment was
not a regular "ordination," but a species of nondescript commis-
sion, solemnized by the mere forms of ordination, how could it be
an interference with the "established order of the national Church?"
How, especially, could it be such an interference, in any important
sense different from that which Wesley had already, for years, been
exercising without " scruple," in sending to America his unordained
preachers } It was clearly an ordination, in the ecclesiastical sense
of the term ; but there have been only three ordinations claimed in
the Christian world, namely, to the offices of, i. Deacons; 2. Eld-
ers or presbyters ; and, 3. Bishops. If, then, Coke was ordained
by \yesley, and was not ordained a bishop, it becomes at once a
pertinent but unanswerable question, To what was he ordained t He
had been a presbyter for years. To what, then, did Wesley ordain
him, if not to the next recognized office }
Let it be remembered that Whatcoat and Vasey were ordained
elders for America at the time of Coke's ordination, but by a dis-
tinct act. If Coke did not receive a higher ordination (that is, epis-
copal, for this is the only higher one), why was he ordained sepa-
rately from them, though on the same occasion ? And why did Wes-
ley, in his circular letter, declare to the American Methodists that,
while Whatcoat and Vasey were " to act as elders among them,"
Coke and Asbury were "to be joint superintendents over them.?"
4. Wesley, in his circular letter, appeals to Lord King's Sketch
of the Primitive Church to show that he, as a presbyter, had a right,
' Drew's Life of Coke, chap. 5.
Appendix. 671
under his peculiar circumstances, to perform these ordinations.
Lord King establishes the second of the above preliminary state-
ments, and the right of presbyters to ordain. And ^Vesley cites
particularly his reference to the Alexandrian Church, where, on the
decease of a bishop, the presbyters ordained his successor.
Why now this reference to Lord King and the Alexandrian
Church — proving that presbyters could ordain — in justification of
Wesley's proceedings, if he did not ordain .? And if he did ordain
Coke, it may again be asked, as Coke was already a presbyter, 1"o
what was he thus ordained, if it was not to the only remaining office
— the episcopacy.^ And still more pointedly may it be asked. What
propriety was there in Wesley's justifying himself by referring to
the ordination of bishops by the presbyters of Alexandria if he
himself had not ordained a bishop ?
5. Wesley prepared at this time a Pra3-er-Book for the American
Church — an abridgment of the English Liturgy — to be used under
the new arrangement. It contains the forms for the ordination of,
1. Deacons ; 2. Elders ; 3. Superintendents ; and directs expressly
that all preachers elected to the office of deacon, elder, or superin-
tendent shall be presented to the superintendent "to be ordained."
Let it be remarked then, i. That here the very word ordain is used.
2. We have here the three distinct offices of the ministry stated in
order, according to the understanding of Wesle)', and of all Episco-
palians throughout the world. 3. That not only is the name of
bishop changed to that of superintendent, but the name of presby-
ter, or priest, to that of elder — the new names being in both cases
synonymous with the old ones. If the change of the former name
implies a difference in the office also, why does not the change
in the latter imply the same ? 4. These forms of ordination were
taken from the forms in the English Liturgy for the ordination of
deacons, presbyters, and bishops, the names of the latter two be-
ing changed to synonymous terms, namely, elders and superintend-
ents. The opponents of the Methodist episcopacy readily grant
that elder means presbyter, yet, as soon as superintendents are men-
tioned as bishops, they protest. 5. These forms show that Wesley
not only created the Alethodist episcopacy, but designed it to con-
tinue after Coke and Asbury's decease ; they were printed for per-
manent use.
6. By reading Coke's letter to Wesle}', consenting to and direct-
ing about his proposed ordination, it will be seen that \\'hatcoat
and Vasey were ordained presbyters at Coke's request, because
" propriety and universal practice," he says, " make it expedient that
I should have two presbyters with me in this work."^ That is, Coke
requests, and Wesley grants, that two presbyters shall be ordained
to accompany Coke in his new office, because "propriety and uni-
versal practice" require that two presbyters assist a bishop in or-
daining ; and yet Coke was not appointed to the office of a bishop I
' Smith's History of Methodism, vol. i., book ii.. chap, vi., p. !;4i.
672 Appe7idix.
Coke in this letter, let it be repeated, requests that these two men
should be made " presbyters ;" Wesley complies ; and yet, in the
forms of the Prayer-Book, or Discipline, they are called "elders."
The name only was changed, therefore, not the thing; why, then, is
not the inference just, that the other change in these forms, that of
bishop to superintendent, is only in the name, not in the thing ?
The rule certainly ought to "work both ways."
7. Charles Wesley was a rigid High-Churchman, and opposed to
all ordinations by his brother. The latter knew his views so well
that he would not expose the present measure to interruption by
acquainting him with it till it was consummated. Though Charles
AVesley was a presbyter of the Church of England, and in the town
at the time, yet other presbyters were summoned to meet the de-
mand of" propriety and universal practice" on such occasions, while
he was carefully avoided. Now why this remarkable precaution
against the High-Church prejudices of his brother respecting ordi-
nations if he did not in these proceedings ordain ? If it be replied
that Charles was not only opposed to his brother's ordaining a bish-
op, but equally to his ordaining to the other offices of the ministry,
and, therefore, the ordinations might have been confined to the lat-
ter, and yet such precautions be proper, it may then be asked again,
How can we suppose Coke to be now ordained to these lower offices
when he had already received them, and had exercised them for
years ?
8. As soon as Charles Wesley learned these proceedings he was
profoundly afflicted. His correspondence with his brother^ shows
that he understood them in tlie manner that the American Method-
ists do, and Wesley never corrected this interpretation. He defends
himself, but never denies the facts. Charles Wesley speaks of
Coke's " Methodist Episcopal Church in Baltimore," alluding to
the name assumed by the American Church at its organization in
that city. Wesley, in his reply, utters not a word in denial or dis-
approval of this title, but simply vindicates the necessity of his course
in respect to the American Methodists. Charles Wesley, in re-
sponse, speaks of the doctor's " ambition" and " rashness." Wes-
ley, though he knew the Church had been organized at Baltimore
with the title of " Episcopal," and had used the very word " bishop,"
but not as a personal title, says, " I believe Dr. Coke as free from
ambition as covetousness. He has done nothing rashly that I
know." Charles Wesley, in his letter to Dr. Chandler, a clergyman
about to sail for America, speaks of his brother having " assumed
the episcopal character, ordained elders, consecrated a bishop, and
sent him to ordain our lay preachers in America," showing thus
what the office really was, though the name was changed. Evident-
ly it was only the appellation of bishop, applied to the superintend-
ents in person, that Wesley disapproved.
9. The Conference at which the Church was organized termina-
■ Jackson's Charles Wesley, chap. 26.
Appendix. 67
t
ted January i, 17S5. The Minutes were published by Coke, with
the title " General Minutes of the Conferences of the Methodist
Episcopal Church in America." The Minutes, as has been stated,
expressly say that the American societies were formed into an Epis-
copal Church, and this, too, at the " recommendation" of Wesley.
By July, Coke was with Wesley at the British Conference. By the
26th of the preceding June, his own Journal, containing this phrase,
was inspected by Wesley. Coke also took to England the Ameri-
can Minutes, and they were printed on a press which Wesley used,
and under his own eye. The Baltimore proceedings were therefore
known to Wesley, but we hear of no remonstrance from him. They
soon became known, by the Minutes, to the public ; and when Coke
was attacked publicly for what he had done, he replied, as we have
seen, through the press, that " he had done nothing but under the
direction of Mr. Wesley." Wesley never denied it. How are all
these facts explicable on the supposition that Coke and Asbury had
ambitiously broken over Wesley's restrictions ?
ID. One of Charles Wesley's greatest fears was, as we have no-
ticed, that the English preachers would be ordained by Coke. He
had prevailed upon his brother to refuse them ordination for years.
He now writes, with deep concern, that " not a preacher in London
would refuse orders from the doctor." " He comes armed with your
authority to make us all Dissenters." Now, why all this sudden
disposition of the English preachers to receive " orders from the
doctor," if it was not understood that he had received episcopal
powers, and they despaired of ever getting ordination from the na-
tional bishops ? If it is replied, they believed, with Wesley, that,
under necessary circumstances, presbyters could ordain, and' there-
fore desired it from Coke, not in view of his new appointment, but
because he was a presbyter of the Church of England, then it may
be properly asked, why did they not seek it before ? for Coke had
been a presbyter among them for years. Why start up with such a
demand all at once as soon as they learned of the new position of
Coke ? And how could Charles Wesley say in this case, " He comes
armed with your authority ?" for his authority as a presbyter he ob-
tained from a bishop of the English Church years before he knew
Wesley.
II. The term bishop was not personally applied in the Discipline
to the American superintendents till about three j'ears after the "or-
ganization" of the Church, and Wesley's objurgatory letter to As-
bury was not written till four years after it. During all this inter-
val, however, the American societies were called an " Episcopal
Church." Six months after adopting the name, its Minutes were,
as stated, inspected by Wesley, and published under his auspices ;
they were called the " Minutes of the Methodist Episcopal Church
in America ;" and they expressly declare that, "following the coun-
sel of Mr. John Wesley, who recommended the episcopal mode of
Church government, we thought it best to become an Episcopal
Church ;" yet, as has been shown, during this long interim Wesley
VOL. III. X X
674 Appendix.
never uttered a syllable against this assumption ! When his broth-
er writes him, accusing Coke of rashness, he replies that " the doc-
tor has done nothing rashly ;" and when Coke is accused through
the press, he declares, under Wesley's eye, and without contradic-
tion, that "he had done nothing without the direction of Mr. Wes-
ley." What, now, do all these incidents imply? What but that
Wesley did approve the American episcopacy — that it was estab-
lished by his direction ? Yet four years after, when the appellation
of bishop had been applied personally to the American episcopoi,
this letter of Wesley was written. What further does this imply?
What but that it was not the thing he condemned, but the name ?
The thing had existed for years uncondemned, nay, defended by
him ; the very name "Episcopal," so far as it applied to the Church
collectively, he did not condemn ; the title "bishop," as a definition
or synonym of " superintendent" in the Minutes, he did not con-
demn; but the personal title of bishop he disapproved, because of
its objectionable associations. Is it possible to escape this infer-
ence?
Thus we see that, whatever view we take of the subject, we are
compelled to one conclusion : that Wesley did create and establish
the American Methodist episcopate. The man who gainsays such
evidence must be given up as incorrigible. There can be no rea-
soning with him.
And now, what is the sum of this evidence ? It has already been
presented with sufficient detail, but let us retrace the successive and
decisive steps of the argument. Here we have Wesley proposing
to establish " the discipline of the Church of England" among the
American Methodists, and to do so he ordains for them bishops,
and gives them an episcopal regimen ; yet, according to their an-
tagonists, he never designed them to be a distinct Church, but only
a " society" in the Protestant Episcopal Church ! Wesley and Coke
have " scruples," delays, references to antiquity, imposition of hands,
and other solemn forms, conforming to the "universal practice" of
episcopal ordination, and yet all concerning some nondescript kind
of appointment, analogous to that which is conferred upon a mis-
sionary in charge over his brethren in a foreign station ! Wesley
speaks of it as " ordaining," and of his refusing to use the right be-
fore the Revolution because it would have interfered with the "es-
tablished order of the national Church ;" and yet a mere secondary
commission of Coke, such a one as had existed in the person of As-
bury for years, is the momentous interference with the established
order of the national Church — though there was nothing in that or-
der with which it could interfere, the national Church never having
had any such appointments ! Wesley solemnly " ordains" Coke ;
and yet it is not to the episcopal office, though he had been ordain-
ed to all the other offices to which ordination is appropriate years
before ! Wesley ordains two other men to the office of elders, and
at the same time separately and formally ordains Coke, who had al-
ready borne this office ; but still Coke's new office is not the only
Appendix. 675
remaining one that could be conferred upon hiin ! Wesley refers
to the ordination of bishops by the presbyters of Alexandria in jus-
tification of his ordination of Coke, and yet he does not ordain Coke
a bishop ! Wesley prepares for the American Church a Prayer-
Book, abridged from that of the Church of England, prescribing the
English forms for the three offices of deacons, presbyters, and bish-
ops ; the two former are admitted unquestionably to be what they
are in England, and yet the latter is explained into something new
and anomalous, answering to nothing ever heard of in the Church
of England or in any other episcopal Church ! In these forms the
old names of two of the offices are changed to new but synonymous
appellations — that of presbyter or priest to elder, that of bishop to
superintendent ; in the former case, the change of the name is not
for a moment supposed to imply a change of the thing, and yet, in
the other case, the change of the name invalidates entirely the thing,
without a particle more evidence for it in one case than in the oth-
er ! Charles Wesley, being a High-Churchman, is kept unaware of
his brother's proceedings till they are accomplished, though he is in
the town at the time of the ordination ; and yet it is no ordination,
but a species of appointment against which he could have had no
episcopal prejudice whatever ! When he learns the facts he is over-
whelmed with surprise, and in his correspondence exclaims against
his " brother's consecration of a bishop," and " Dr. Coke's Methodist
Episcopal Church" at Baltimore ; and Wesley, in his replies, never de-
nies these titles, but simply vindicates his ordinations, and says that
Coke had " done nothing rashly ;" yet there was no bishop, no epis-
copal office appointed, no distinct episcopal Church established, but
Coke had fabricated the whole ! When the preachers in England,
trained, from childhood, under episcopacy, hear of Coke's new office,
they are, to the great alarm of Charles Wesley, suddenly seized with
a desire to be ordained by Coke, though they fully know that he is
no bishop, but the same presbyter that he had been among them for
years ! In six months after the organization of the American Church,
Coke publishes its Minutes, with the title " Methodist Episcopal
Church in America," in London, under the eye of Wesley, and in
these Minutes it is declared that Wesley " recommended the episco-
pal mode of Church government ;" but no remonstrance is heard
from Wesley ! When Coke is condemned through the press for his
proceedings, he publicly replies that he had done " nothing without
the direction of Mr. Wesley •" no rebuke follows from Wesley, but
Coke goes on as usual, active in his Conferences, and maintained in
his new position ; and 3'et his American proceedings were an ambi-
tious plot, contrary to the will of AVesley ! The American Method-
ists had borne the title " Episcopal Church," with Wesley's full ap-
proval, for four years, when, on the use of the personal title of bishop,
Wesley writes his letter to Asburj^ ; and yet it is not the mere per-
sonal title he condemns, but the office which for four years he had
left uncondemned, nay, had vindicated !
And now, looking again at this series of arguments, will not the
676 Appendix.
American Methodists be acquitted of presumption when they as-
sume that they may here make a triumphant stand, surrounded by
evidence altogether impregnable? The mighty ecclesiastical sys-
tem under which it has pleased God to give them and their fam-
ilies spiritual shelter and fellowship with his saints, and whose effi-
ciency has surprised the Christian world, is not, as their opponents
would represent, an imposition of their preachers, and contrary to
the wishes of Wesley, but was legitimately received from his hands
as the providential founder of Methodism.
If Wesley's strong repugnance to the mere name of bishop had
been expressed before its adoption by the American Church, it
would probably not have been adopted. Still, the American Church
was now a separate organization, and was at perfect liberty to dis-
sent from Wesley on a matter of mere expediency. The Church
thought it had good reasons to use the name. The American Meth-
odists were mostly of English origin. The people of their country
anions: whom Methodism was most successful were either from En-
gland or of immediate English descent, and had been educated to
consider episcopacy a wholesome and apostolical government of
the Church. The Church approved and had the office, why not,
then, have the name ? especially as, without the name, the office it-
self would be liable to lose, in the eyes of the people, its peculiar
character, and thereby ica\ in that appeal to their long-established
opinions which Methodism had a right, both from principle and ex-
pediency, to make ? The English Establishment having been dis-
solved in this countr}% and the Protestant Episcopalians not being
yet organized on an independent basis, and the episcopal organiza-
tion of the Methodists having preceded that of the Protestant Epis-
copalians, the Methodist Church had a clear right to present itself
to the American public as competent to aid in supplying the place
of the abolished Establishment, having the same essential principles
without its peculiar defects.
And may not the circumstance of the assumption of an episcopal
character, nominally as well as really, by the American IMethodists,
be considered providential ? Episcopacy, both in America and En-
gland, has reached an excess of presumption and arrogance. The
moderate party, once declared by Bishop White, of the Protestant
Episcopal Church, to include a large majority of American Episco-
palians,^ has nearly disappeared. Was it not providential, under
these circumstances, that a body of Christians should appear, ex-
ceeding every other in success, and nominally and practically bear-
ing an episcopal character, without any of its presumptuous preten-
sions ? Amid the uncharitable assumptions of prelatical Episcopa-
lians, the Methodist Episcopal Church stands forth a monument of
the laborious and simple episcopacy of the early ages, its success,
as well as its humility, contrasting it signally with its more preten-
tious but feebler sister. It has thus practically vindicated episco-
' Case of the Prot. Epis. Church in the United States, etc., p. 25.
Appendix. 677
pacy as an expedient form of ecclesiastical government, and assu-
redly it needs vindication in these days.
Such, then, is the evidence which should, with all men of self-re-
spectful candor, conclude decisively the question of Wesley's design
and agency in the organization of American Methodism.
Driven from this ground, objectors retreat to an equally untenable
one by alleging that the episcopal organization of the societies in
America is to be attributed to the influence of ambitious counselors
over Wesley in the imbecility of his old age. It has already been
shown that he as yet betrayed no such imbecility ; but it has still
more conclusively been demonstrated that the ecclesiastical opin-
ions which sanction this great act were adopted in the prime of his
manhood. They were the well-considered and fully demonstrated
convictions of two score years, before he yielded to the unavoida-
ble necessity of giving them practical effect. Few facts in the his-
tory of Methodism are more interesting and instructive than the
gradual development of Wesley's own mind and character under his
extraordinary and accumulating responsibilities ; it has therefore
been studiously traced throughout the preceding pages. No read-
er who has followed our narrative will accept this last objection to
the American Methodist episcopacy, and no possible ground of ar-
gument remains for its opponents but the prelatical charge against
its legitimacy, founded in the traditional and exploded ecclesias
ticism of obsolete ages. Methodists are content, with Wesle3% to
pronounce the apostolic succession " a fable which no man ever did,
or ever can prove," and believe that, in this age, they need not anx-
iously challenge any advantage which their opponents can claim
from a pretension so incompatible alike with the letter and the
charity of the Gospel, as well as with the Christian enlightenment
of modern times. ^
[Attempts have been made to impugn Coke, as having overween-
ingly led Wesley into this important measure.- The charge, how-
ever, were it valid, could not affect the validity of the measure itself
as genuinely Wesleyan, and as giving to American Methodism an
Episcopal organization. After the preceding review, no one can
doubt that the whole proceeding was in accordance with "Wesley's
own views of Church government. He was, as we have seen, a de-
cided Episcopalian, and he designed to give the American Method-
ist, as he says, " the discipline of the Church of England ;" that is
• Wesley was in good company among Churchmen in his denunciation of the
"fable" of the succession. Chillingworth said, " I am fully persuaded there hath
been no such succession." Bishop Stillingflcet declares that " this succession is
as muddy as the Tiber itself" IJishop Iloadley asserts, "It hath not pleased
God, in his providence, to keep up any proof of the least probability, or moral
possibility, of a regular uninterrupted succession ; but there is a great appear-
ance, and, humanly speaking, a certainty to the contrary, that the succession hath
often been interrupted." Archbishop Whately says " there is not a minister in
all Christendom who is able to trace up, with approach to certainty, his spiritual
pedigree."
" Tyerman's Wesley, vol. iii. An. 1784.
678 Appendix.
to say, an Episcopal regimen. His appeal to Lord King's proof,
that the presbyters of Alexandria ordained bishops, could otherwise
have no relevancy. His use of this proof with Coke, while the latter
hesitated, shows what was his original design, and it is impossible
to conceive what merely Presbyterian system, without a " superin-
tendency" or episcopate, could at this time fit into the itinerant
ministerial scheme of the American Church, where Rankin and As-
bury had hitherto been superintendents, though without ordination
or the power to ordain.
Whether Coke influenced Wesley or not does not, then, let it be
repeated, affect the main question. Whether Wesley was influenced
or not, he did construct and solemnly appoint the Episcopal system
of the American. Methodists, such as it was adopted by the Confer-
ence of 1784; he did provide for its perpetuation by abridging,
printing, and sending over with Coke the English Liturgy, contain-
ing its forms of ordination for the threefold ministerial functions
recognized in the Anglican Church, and all these acts were in strict
accordance with his long-avowed ideas of Church government.
Coke's character alone, then, is concerned in this charge. That
character, however, is dear to all Methodists, and important, not to
the validity, but to the historical character of the American episco-
pate. He is to stand forever as its first representative. I have
elsewhere sketched his remarkable life and character.^ Though he
had essential greatness, he had, doubtless, characteristic weaknesses
also. There have been few^ great men without them. The faults of
such men become the more noticeable, either by contrast with or
by partaking of their greatness ; and the vanity of ordinary human
nature is eagerly disposed, in self-gratulation, to criticise, as pecul-
iar defects of superior minds, infirmities which are common to all.
Practical energy was his chief intellectual trait, and, if it was some-
times effer\'escent, it was never evanescent. He had a leading
agency in the greatest facts of Methodism, and it was impossible
that the series of momentous deeds which mark his career could
have been the result of mere accident or fortune. They must have
been legitimate to the man. Neither Whitefield nor Wesley ex-
ceeded him in ministerial travels. It is probable that no Methodist
of his day, it is doubtful whether any Protestant of his day, contrib-
uted more from his own property for the spread of the Gospel. His
biographer says that he expended the whole of his patrimonial es-
tate, which was large, on his missions and their chapels. He was
married twice ; both his wives were like-minded with himself, and
both had considerable fortunes, which were used like his own. In
1794 was published an account of his missionary receipts and dis-
bursements for the preceding year, from which it appeared that
there were due him nearly eleven thousand dollars ; but he gave the
whole sum to the cause. Flying, during nearly forty years, over
' History of Methodism, vol. W'l., fassim. History of the M. E. Church, vol. ii.,
p. 151 ; vol. iv., p. 503.
Appendix. 679
England, Scotland, Wales, and Ireland ; crossing the Atlantic eight-
een times; traversing the United States and the West Indies; the
first who suggested the organization of English Methodism by Wes-
ley's Deed of Declaration ; the organizer, under Wesley, of Ameri-
can Methodism ; one of the first, if not the very first, of Protestant
bishops in the Western hemisphere ; the founder of the Methodist
missions in the West Indies, in Africa, and in Asia, as well as in
Ireland, Wales, and England ; the official and almost sole director
of the missionary operations of the denomination during his long
public life, and the founder of the first Tract Society in the world,
he must be recognized as one of the chief representative men of
modern religious history, if not, indeed, as Asbury pronounced him,
" the greatest man of the last century as a minister of Christ."
Asbury, who hesitated not thus to place him above Wesley " as
a minister of Christ," knew him well, and especially knew him in
those transactions for which he has been most blamed. A set-
tled and wealthy clergyman of the Establishment, bearing the
highest literary title which its universities could give, a man of
high family and high prospects, he forsook, under the influence
of deepened religious feelings, all his apparent advantages, to be-
come a wandering evangelist in Wesley's despised but heroic band
of itinerants. He became, as Wesley called him, " the right hand"
of the great founder. His spirit flamed with evangelic zeal. He
expressed truly his own character in the exclamation, recorded
on the high seas, when passing for the first time to America, " I
want the wings of an eagle and the voice of a trumpet, that I
may proclaim the Gospel through the East and the West, the
North and the South." He seemed almost ubiquitous in the United
States, superintending its ministry, and in the United Kingdom, ad-
ministering the affairs of the Wesleyan Church, founding and con-
ducting its Irish, its Welsh, its " Domestic," and its Foreign Mis-
sions, virtually embodying in his own person the whole missionary
enterprise of English Alethodism. When an old man of nearly sev-
enty years he conceived the project of introducing Methodism into
Asia. He presented himself before the British Conference, and,
against great opposition, entreated, with tears, to be sent as a mis-
sionary to India, offering to defray the expenses of himself and seven
chosen colleagues. The Conference could not resist his appeal,
and at length, on the 30th of December, 1813, he departed with his
little band, consisting of nine persons besides himself. He died on
the voyage, and was buried in the Indian Ocean ; but, though the
great leader was no more, his spirit remained, and the successful
East Indian Missions of Methodism are the sublime results. His-
tory should respect the reputation of such a man.
The charge of his leading Wesley into the measures for the or-
ganization of the American Church is made in spite of the express
testimony of Drew, his intimate friend and biographer, who says that
"Wesley, in his study, 'City Road,' first divulged his purpose to
Coke," and that, arguing with him there on the ordination of bishops
68o Appendix.
by presbyters in the Alexandrian Church, he concluded by propos-
ing " that, being himself a presbyter, Coke should accept ordination
from his hands, and proceed to the continent of America to super-
intend the societies in the United States."^
A letter from Coke to Wesley, proposing that a messenger should
be sent to America to inspect the field and report to Wesley, has
been cited as proof of Coke's overweening wish for such an appoint-
ment.2 The hostile critic seems not to be aware that this letter was
written after Wesley's proposition to send Coke as superintendent.
The conversation in Wesley's London study was in February, 1784.
Coke's letter, proposing a preliminary inspection and report of the
wants of the American societies, was not written till the middle of
April ["Near Dublin, April 17, 1784"]. It was actually sent while
he was yet considering Wesley's proposition. It showed his hesi-
tancy rather than his eagerness for the new office.
Thus far, then, no solicitation, no selfish management, is apparent
in the course of Coke. If, contrary to Drew's express statement,
the particular act of Coke's ordination by Wesley was by the request
of Coke himself, it does not materially affect the question of either
the American Church system or Coke's character. Wesley undoubt-
edly designed, as we have seen, that the former should be a system
of superintendency, of practical episcopacy " conformed to the dis-
cipline of the Church of England," as he expressly says — such as,
in fact, it had hitherto been, except that its superintendents had not
yet the function of ordination, which was now to be supplied. If
he had not at first designed to ordain Coke (according to his rea-
soning about the Alexandrian example), it was doubtless because he
had assumed that Coke, being already a presbyter, could, in accord-
ance with that example, ordain Asbury a superintendent, and com-
plete the organization of the American Church. Now Wesley had,
as we have seen, for years believed in the essential parity of presby-
ters and bishops, and their equal right to ordain. Coke's request (if
any there were) for more formal authorization by Wesley himself was
perfectly correspondent with Wesley's theory and design, and, this
being the fact, it was indisputably expedient, as Wesley himself saw.
The agitations and debates among the American Methodists ren-
dered it necessary that he should bear with him the highest possible
sanction of Wesley, who was recognized as founder and superinten-
1 Drew's Life of Coke, p. 62. Etheridge (Life of Coke, p. loi) says : " A writer
in the Quarterly Review affirms that it was Coke who first requested Wesley to
make him a bishop, and send him as such to America. The opposite is the
truth : the request came from Wesley, and took Coke by surprise. He had not
even given the clerical question involved in the project any serious consideration ;
and he first required of Wesley some time for investigation, before he could
express with confidence an opinion upon it at all. He now applied himself to
those Biblical and patristic studies which bear upon the subject, and after the
lapse of two months, spent partly in Scotland, communicated to Wesley that the
conclusions at which he had arrived enabled him, without any hesitation, to con-
cur with himself as to the abstract lawfulness of the measure which had been
propounded."
^ Tyerman's Wesley, vol. iii., p. 428.
Appendix. 68 1
dent of the whole Methodist cause. Coke's Hability to disaffected
criticism at home, especially from Charles Wesley (whose opinions
were well known), gave him a right to claim, as he did in his letter
to Wesley, that the latter should " be obliged to acknowledge that I
acted under your direction" — a phrase which would have been in-
admissible had not Wesley's designs corresponded fully with his
own. This objection to Coke, then, is not relevant. His course
was logical ; it was prudent ; it was necessary ; and its historical
results have proved its supreme wisdom.
Almost every other disputed act of Coke's life has been adduced
to confirm the unfounded objection to his course in this great meas-
ure. It has been alleged that he wrote to Bishop White, of Phila-
delphia, that " he would like the Methodists of America to be re-
united to the English [American Protestant Episcopal] Church on
condition that he himself were ordained to be their bishop."' Coke
was already a bishop, and Asbury another, in America ; their de-
nomination was already more extended than the Protestant Episco-
pal Church, and it had an immeasurably better prospect in the new
republic. Coke's impulsive zeal and catholicity led him to think,
what many Churchmen, if not Methodists, have since thought, that
a union of the two bodies would be a blessing to common Christian-
ity. If he was imprudent, he was nevertheless charitable in his de-
sire. It did more credit to his heart than discredit to his head.
He did not propose it, as alleged, in order to be " ordained their
bishop." He included his Episcopal colleague, Asbury, and all his
ministerial brethren. The union was to be made " on terms which
in no wise compromised the honor or rights of the Methodist Epis-
copal Church."'^ "I never did apply," says Coke, "to the General
Convention, or any other Convention, for reconsecration. I never
intended that either Bishop Asbury or myself should give up our
episcopal office if the junction were to take place."
It has been alleged against him, as an " unpleasant fact," and as
illustrating his course in the present case with Wesley, that he solic-
ited the " Prince Regent and the government to appoint him their
bishop in India," and this " within twelve months of his lamented
death. "^ This aspersion is founded in incidents connected with
that last heroic mission to India above noticed, for which, in his old
age, he sublimely sacrificed his property, his episcopal functions in
America, and his life, but founded the whole East India INIethodist
w^ork. The British domination there had, to his eyes, opened a
door for the Gospel to all Asia. For some years he had been plan-
ning and working for a mission to the Hindoos ; the East India Com-
pany's government " had steadily opposed" their evangelization ;
Coke knew that he could not accomplish his grand designs without
authority from the home government in an episcopal appointment ;
for this reason he sought that appointment. He was still a priest
' Tyerman, vol. iii., p. 344.
^ History of M. E. Church, vol. iii., p. 41. Also vol. iv., p. 443.
^ Tyerman, vol, iii., p. 434.
682 Appendix.
of the national Church, and the Wesleyans were all yet considered
as members of that Church. He proved the purity of his purpose
when his application failed, for then, as we have seen, he stood, an
aged and broken man, before the British Conference, and extorted,
•by his entreaties, his tears, and the pledge of his own property, its
consent to let him go, with a corps of Methodist evangelists, and at-
tempt the great work in the only way that remained for him.^
Again, it is alleged that " in 1794 he secretly summoned a meeting
of the most influential of the English preachers, and passed a resolu-
tion that the Conference should appoint an order of bishops to ordain
deacons and elders, he himself, of course, expecting to be a member
of the prelatical brotherhood."'^ The real facts of this case, as in
the others, need but to be correctly stated to fully vindicate Coke.
Wesley had been dead some three years ; the Wesleyans were in
the greatest anxiety and distraction respecting their permanent or-
ganization during these years ; the very existence of the body seemed
periled ; ministerial disputes and popular agitation prevailed, ending
at last in the Kilham schism ; the people were clamoring for the
sacraments — the preachers were not empowered, by ordination, to
administer them. "At present we really have no government," wrote
Pawson, the president of the Conference, toward the latter part of
1793. "It will by no means answer our ends to dispute one with
another as to which is the most scriptural form of Church govern-
ment. We should consider our present circumstances, and endeavor
to agree upon some method by which our people may have the ordi-
nances of God, and, at the same time, be preserved from division. I
care not a rush whether it be Episcopal or Presbyterian ; I believe
neither of them to be purely scriptural. But our preachers and peo-
ple in general are prejudiced against the latter ; consequently, if the
former will answer our end, we ought to embrace it. Indeed, I be-
lieve it will suit our present plan far better than the other. The de-
sign of Mr. Wesley will weigh much with many, which now evidently
appears to have been this : He foresaw that the Methodists would,
after his death, soon become a distinct people ; he was deeply preju-
diced against a Presbyterian, and was as much in favor of an Epis-
copal form of government. In order, therefore, to preserve all that
was valuable in the Church of England among the Methodists, he
ordained Mr. Mather and Dr. Coke bishops. These he undoubtedly
designed should ordain others. Mr. Mather told us so at the Man-
chester Conference, but we did not then understand him. I see no
way of coming to any good settlement but on the plan I mentioned
before. I sincerely wish that Dr. Coke and Mr. Mather may be al-
lowed to be what they are, bishops. We must have ordination
among us at any rate."^ It was in these circumstances that Coke
^ See Etheridge's Coke, p. 368. Etheridge gives all the facts of the case, and
fully vindicates Coke from the charge of unchristian ambition.
^ Tyerman, vol. iii., p. 434.
^ Smith, History of Methodism, etc., vol. ii., p. 4, 3. Stevens's History of Meth-
odism, vol. iii., p. 51.
AppC7idix. 68
o
met some of the most venerable and devoted preachers at Litchfield.
He " addressed them on the agitated state of the Connection, and
the perils which menaced it; he referred to the success of Method-
ism in the New World under its Episcopal organization, and the re-
lief which ^V' esley's establishment of this form of government there
had given to a similar controversy. He offered ordination to the
brethren who were present. His motive was disinterested, for he
already possessed the Episcopal office and dignity, conferred by an
authority which they all venerated above that of any archbishop of
the realm. Most of the meeting approved his proposition, but Moore,
who had been ordained by Wesley, very wisely suggested that they
should confine their proceedings to the discussion of its practicabil-
ity, and defer its decision to the next Conference. He, however,
pronounced the measure a scriptural and suitable expedient for the
government of any Christian Church. Mather concurred with
Moore. They adjourned after adopting a series of resolutions
which were to be submitted with all their signatures to the Annual
Conference."^ It is certainly remarkable that a sinister motive
could be imputed to Coke in these circumstances — to him who had
already a diocese co-extensive with the United States of America.
An impartial revision, then, of all the facts directly or indirectly
involved in this discussion, results, first, in a vindication of the
Episcopal government, adopted at Baltimore in 1784, as the genu-
ine work of Wesley himself, accordant with his previously declared
opinions on the subject ; and, secondly, of Coke's conduct respect-
ing it, as also in the other above facts alleged against him. Wesley
was just when, after the whole measure had transpired, he declared
Coke to " have done nothing rashly," and that he was " as free from
ambition as from covetousness."]
' History of Methodism, vol. iii., p. 52.
INDEX.
Aberdeen, ii. 404, 470, 568 ; iii. 10,
411.
"Act of Toleration," ii. 385.
Adam, Rev. Thomas, ii. 209, 251 ;
iii. 18.
Adams, Rev. Mr., i. 485.
Adams, Tliomas, i. 536.
"Advice to a Young Clergyman," i.
106.
Affleck, Andrew, ii. 471.
African Methodist Episcopal Church,
i-. 9-
African Mission proposed, iii. 272.
Agutter, Rev. Mr., iii. 536.
Alemouth, ii. 140.
Alliance, Quadruple, ii. 557.
Alnwick, ii. 166, 276, 328 ; ii. 473,
573-
Alpraham, iii. 352.
Ambition, i. 20.
American Colonies, i. 1 14.
American Indians, i. 1 15, 124, 130.
American Methodism, i. 8, 9 ; iii. 47,
60, 62, 75, 116, 151, 175, 194, 248,
331, 426, 498, 646.
American Rebellion, iii. 147, 185,
237-
American Wesleyan Methodists, i. 9.
Amsterdam, i. 197; iii. 394, 395.
Andrews, Mr., iii. 28.
Andrews, Rev. John, i. 428 ; ii. 493.
Animal Magnetism, iii. 603, 648.
Annesley, Dr. Samuel, i. 285.
Antigua, iii. 151, 195, 273.
Antinomianism, i. 477, 481, 519; ii.
400 ; iii. 14.
Antislavery Society, iii. 508.
Apparitions, i. 22, 23; iii. II, 40, 41.
Appleton, John, iii. 449.
Arbroath, iii. 66, 120, 457.
Armagh, ii. 601 ; iii. 41, 154.
Arminian Magazine, iii. 251, 280, 316,
344. 346, 367. 388, 406, 455. 469,
488, 508, 515, 563, 594,634.
Asbury, Francis, ii. 610; iii. 7, 1 10,
175, 195, 248, 429, 435, 438.
Ashbourne, ii. 195.
Ashburton, ii. 585.
Ashby de la Zouch, ii. 501.
Ashton under Lyne, iii. 371.
Assistants, duties of, i. 445, 499.
Athlone, ii. 4, 35, 37, 78, 601.
Atlay, John, iii. 207, 297, 315, 404,
552-558, 565, 567.
Atmore, Charles, iii. 441, 533, 604,
607, 618.
Atterbury, Bishop, i. 42, 60.
Aughrim, ii. 4, 78.
Aylesbury, iii. 29.
Backhouse, Rev. William, ii. 489.
Baddiley, Rev. William, ii. 195, 205,
211.
Bagshaw, Matthew, ii. 560.
Baildon, iii. 362.
Bailey, Rev. Mr., ii. 90.
Balham, iii. 589, 599, 650.
Ball, Hannah, ii. 534 ; iii. 241.
Ball, Roger, ii. 77,
Ballinrobe, iii. 460.
Bandon, ii. 36, 81, 304, 354; iii. 645.
Bandroom Methodists, i. 5.
Bands, Methodist, i. 445, 463 ; ii. 475,
516; iii. 22, 542.
Banff, Lady, iii. 412.
Baptism, i. 229; ii. 135, 264.
Barber, John, iii. 441, 474, 533, 645.
Barclay's Apology, i. 489.
Bardsley, Samuel, ii. 540 ; iii. 156,
164, 208, 348, 353, 402, 591, 592.
Barlow, Margaret, iii. 535.
Bamardcastle, ii. 141, 434, 472, 535,
569 ; iii. 18, 293, 537.
Barnes, John, ii. 552.
Barnet, iii. 488.
Barnsley, iii. 474.
Bate, Rev. James, i. 249.
Bateman, Rev. Richard T., i. 548.
Bath, ii. 557, 587 ; iii. 252, 290, 305,
614, 623.
Bath yoiinial, ii. 41.
Baxter, John, iii. 273.
Bayley, Dr. Cornelius, ii. 261 ; iii.
397, 416.
Beard, Thomas, i. 441.
Beau Nash, i. 237.
Bedford, ii. 160, 274, 300,340, 3";8.
Bedford, Rev. Arthur, i. 209, 364.
Behmen, Jacob, ii. 265 ; iii. 341, 388.
Belfast, ii. 240, 445, 600.
686
Index.
Bell, George, u. 433, 441, 444- 450.
460, 462, 507, 556 ; iii. 13, 29, 59.
Benefactions, Wesley's, iii. 615.
Benezet, Anthony, iii. 1 15.
Bennet, John, i. 472 ; ii.42, 57, 129;
iii. 119.
Bennett, Rev. Mr., i. 458.
Bennis, Elizabeth, iii. 45.
Benson, Joseph, ii. 474; iii. 35, 51,
70, 73, no, 152, 168, 215, 247, 270,
272, 324, 334, 341, 538, 603.
Beresford, Miss, ii. 195.
Berridge, Rev. John, ii. 309, 324, 331-
333, 356, 370, 397. 444, 459, 463,
491 ; iii. 2, 158.
Berwick, ii. 328.
Bethnal Green, iii. 193.
Beveiley, ii. 330, 502 ; iii. 61 1.
Bible Christians, i. 6.
Bible, Study of, i. 532.
Bideford, iii. 591.
Bigg, Thomas, ii. 53.
Bingham, iii. 69.
Bingley, ii. 275, 411, 573; iii. 225,
243, 325, 414.
Birmingham, i. 488 ; n. 115, 163, 195,
348, 399, 500 ; iii- 7, 392, 472, 493,
503, 568, 603.
Birr, ii. 4.
Birstal, i. 369, 383, 440; ii. 121, 139,
331, 412 ; iii. 270, 373, 404.
Bishop of Bristol, i. 246.
Bishop, Letter to a, iii. 513, 613.
Bishop, Miss, ii. 559; iii. 86, 97, 278,
357, 450-
Bishops, Interview with, i. 230.
Bisson, Miss, iii. 599, 609.
Black, William, iii. 401, 452, 484, 492,
506, 541, 591, 612.
Blackburn, iii. 325.
Blackheath, i. 359.
Blackwell, Ebenezer, i. 555, 558, 559;
ii. 5, 26,83, 107, 142, 169, 174, 185,
196, 219, 236, 275, 304, 326, 352,
414, 506 ; iii. 251.
Blackwell, Richard, ii. 587.
Blades, John, iii. 536.
Blair, Andrew, iii. 459.
Blarney, ii. 37.
Blendon, i. 173, 178.
Boarding Schools, iii. 120.
Boardman, Richard, iii. 47, 54*
Bogie, James, iii. 362.
Bohler, Peter, i. 177, 179. 181, 186,
197, 532 ; ii. 156-158 ; iii. 201, 595.
Bolton, i. 547 ; ii. 18, 57, 116; ui. 191,
351, 472, 501, 527.
Bolton, Edward, ii. 498.
Bolton, Miss, ii. 498 ; iii. 644.
Bolzius, Martin, i. 15 1.
Book Stewards' Circular, ii. 179.
Books recommended by Dr. Doddridge,
i- 517-
Books recommended by Wesley, iii.
359, 450-
Booth, Alice, i. 546.
Booth, John, iii. 645.
Boothbank, i. 546.
Borlase, Dr., i. 453, 470.
Bosanquet, Miss, ii. 286, 289, 517,
5S8; iii. 68, III, 206, 208, 213,
240, 329.
Boston, ii. 327, 413; iii. 327.
Boswell, James, iii. 294.
Bourke, Richard, ii. 603.
Bourne, Hugh, ii. 609.
Bowden, Dr. Samuel, ii. 190-
Bowman, Rev. William, i. 328.
Brackenbury, Robert C, iii. 338, 393,
408, 429, 4S7, 504, 507, 625, 649,
Bradburn, Samuel, iii. 177, 251, 287,
315, 334, 336, 355, 376, 525, 526,
546, 616.
Bradford (Yorkshire), ii. 12, 331, 569.
Bradford (Wilts), iii. 52, 409.
Bradford, Joseph, iii. 16, 156, 203,
204, 338, 403, 557, 606, 649, 651,
652, 655.
Brainerd, David, iii. 36.
Brammah, Alice, iii. 29.
lirammah, William, iii. 243.
]5ram\vell, William, iii. 354.
Brandon, John, ii. 170, 281.
Breage, ii. 218.
Brecon, i. 457.
Bredin, John, iii. 1 5 1, 643.
Brcttell, Jeremiah, iii. 403.
Bribery, i. 554; ii. 515-
Briggs, William, ii. 176-179.
Briscoe, Thomas, iii. 375.
Bristol, i. 234, 296, 390, 391, 425, 461 ;
ii. I, 25, 75, 85, 86, 171, 190, 235, 255,
290, 339- 362, 425, 481, 512, 514,
546, 587; iii. 28, 52, 75, no, 129,
157, 165, 178, 236, 349, 364,370,
391, 396, 404, 492, 530, 568, 589,
600, 622.
Bristol Weekly Intelligencer, ii. 85.
Broadbent, John, iii. 393, 487.
Brooke, Heniy, iii. 172, 342, 392.
liroughton. Rev. J., i. 68, 83, 102,
108, 132, 178.
Broughton, Sir Thomas, iii. 1 19.
Brute Creation, iii. 347.
Bryan, Jonathan, iii. 117.
Bryant, Thomas, ii. 487.
Buchan, Earl, iii. 2.
Bull, Patrick, iii. 189.
Bulmer, Agnes, iii. 541.
Bumby, John H., ii. 277.
Bunting, Dr., i. 340.
Index.
6S7
Bunyan's Pilgrim's Progress, i. 434.
Burbeck, Edward, iii. 507.
Burgess, Joseph, iii. 577.
Burnet, Bishop, i. 64.
Burnley, iii. 414.
Burslem, ii. 349; iii. 8, 127, 472, 493.
Burton, Dr. John, i. loS, 136.
Burton on Trent, ii. 560.
Bury, iii. 166.
Bush, Elijah, iii. 231, 364.
Butterworth, Joseph, i. 545.
Butterworth, Rev. John, i. 545.
Butts, Thomas, ii. 142, 176-179.
Buxton, iii. 393.
Byrom, Dr. i. 135. 210, 243- 484-
Byron, James Mac, iii. 7, 406.
Cadogan, Dr., iii. no, 1S2.
Cadogan, Rev. W. B., iii. 179.
Calling of Methodist Preachers, iii. 635.
"Calm Address," Publication of, iii.
186-192.
Calvinism, i. 39; ii. 191-193; iii. 278.
Calvinist Concessions, i. 349.
Calvinist Controversy, iii. 71, 81, 86,
97, 136, 158, 179, 209, 228, 232, 259.
Calvinistic Methodists, i. 402, 511.
Camborne, i. 453.
Cambridge, Miss, iii. 645.
Candler, William, iii. 627.
Canterbury, ii. 69, 230, 309, 339, 425,
5"-
Cardiff, i. 560.
Carlisle, iii. 63.
Carrickfergus, ii. 240, 350, 445.
Castle Carey, iii. 506.
Castlebar, iii. 153.
Catechism, ii. 64.
Catechumen Classes, ii. 362.
Catholic Spirit, ii. 374.
Causton, Thomas, i. 143, 152, 162.
Cavignac, General, ii. 350.
Cayley, Cornelius, ii. 317.
Celibacy, i. 432 ; ii. 6, 551.
Cennick, John, i. 225, 263, 274, 277,
295. 331. 343. 344, 360, 402, 419,
556, 559; ii. 23, loi.
Chandler, Samuel, ii. 493.
Channel Islands, iii. 503-505.
Chapel Affairs, i. II, 270, 519; ii. 291,
539, 584, 610 ; iii. 30, 70, 152, 21O,
325- 5"' 533. 614. 619, 622.
Chapel-en-le-Frith, iii. 472.
Chapman, Mrs., i. 138.
Chapman, Rev. Jacob, ii. 482.
Chapman, \Villiam, i. 133.
Charlton, Mary, iii. 353.
Charter House School, i. 19.
Chatham, iii. 6.
Cheltenham, ii. 559 ; iii. 7.
Chester, i. 547; ii. 142, 448, 565 ; iii.
410, 500.
Chesterlield, iii. 226.
Chester-le- Street, ii. 277, 329, 538.
Cheyne, Dr., i. 27.
Children's Meetings, i. 446 ; iii. 23.
Chinley, i. 459.
Chipping, ii. 116.
Christian, Almost a, i. 175-
Christian, David, i. 200
" Christian Library," ii. 26, 65.
Church Government, i. 499 ; ii. 257.
Church, Rev. Thomas, i. 455, 478, 530.
Church, Stephen, ii. 376.
Church, William, iii. 277.
Churchey, Walter, iii. 244, 282, 547, 579.
Circuits, Division of, iii. 601, 632.
City Road Chapel, iii. 220, 241,243,
251, 255, 275, 297.
Clanmain, ii. 445.
Clark, Rev. James, ii. 244, 373.
Clarke, Adam, ii. 1 19, 227; iii. 342,
386, 397, 504, 507, 583- 599, 609,
614, 619, 623, 643, 644, 648.
Clarkson, Thomas, iii. 115.
Class Meetings, i. 379, 380; ii. 516; iii.
215, 328, 550.
Classes, Methodist, i. 353, 377; iii. 391.
Classical Learning, i. il 7.
Classleaders, i. 446 ; iii. 109..
Clayton, Rev. John, i. 68, 83, 93, 94 ;
ii. 138.
Clements, William, i. 494.
Clergy, Advice to Young, ii. 63.
Clerical Costume, ii. 33S.
Clippendale, Mrs., iii. I16.
Clive, Sir Edward, ii. 300.
Clones, iii. 202.
Clonmel, ii. 237.
Clowes, William, ii. 609.
Clulow, Elizabeth, iii. 8.
Coates, Alexander, ii. 413.
Cobham, Mr., ii. 351.
Cockburn, Dr., ii. 278.
Cocker, Jeremiah, ii. 502 ; iii. 226, 474.
Coke, Dr. Thomas, iii. 16, 214, 222,
244, 271, 297, 299, 310, 334, 361,
378, 396, 403, 421, 428-432, 478,
480-485, 492, 542, 552, 562, 570,
580, 605.
Colbeck, Thomas, ii. 14.
Colchester, ii. 313, 324, 327, 334, 342;
iii. 627.
Coleford, i. 487 ; ii. 236 ; iii 590.
College. Methodist, proposed, ii. 36O;
Colley, Rev. Benjamin, ii. 413, 614.
Collins, Rev. Brian, iii. 310. 315, 335,
391,454, 573.
Coine, ii. 15 ; iii. 226, 243.
Cologne, i. 197.
Communion of Saints, iii. 157-
688
Index.
Community, The Christian, iii. 134.
Companions, Trifling, i. 54.
Conferences, Methodist, i. 441, 497,
527, 551 ; iL 5, 60, 104, 120, 144,
166, 187, 240, 27S, 305, 333, 354,
41S, 448, 474, 479, 511, 538, 5S4,
608; iii. 21, 45, 70, no, 126, 156,
177, 209, 226, 245, 270, 302, 328,
36 r, 372, 396, 465, 477, 496, 547,
584, 598, 618.
Congleton, ii. 349 ; iii. 8, 165, 604.
Coningsby, ii. 11, 327.
Connexion, Lady Huntingdon's, i. 5 >
iii. 430-432.
Consecration of Churches, etc., ii. 512;
iii. 528.
Conversation, iii. 3.
Conversion, Instantaneous, i. 178.
Convicts, i. 175 ; ii. 27.
Conyers, Rev. Dr., ii. 335, 473, 502.
Coolylough, ii. 354.
Cooper, Jane, ii. 450, 494.
Cooper, Ezekiel, iii. 645.
Cooper, IMiss, i. 382.
Cordeux, Rev. Mr., ii. 571.
Cork, ii. 36, 80, 147, 237, 304; iii.
42, 269, 460.
Cornwall, i. 415, 555; ii. 362.
Costerdine, Robert, iii. 48.
Coughlan, Lawrence, ii. 313 ; iii. 25,
Courcy, Rev. Richard de, ii. 471; iii. 65,
84.
Coventry, lii. 295, 399.
Coward, William, ii. 276.
Cownley, Joseph, ii. 53, 83, 117, 129,
200, 206, 230, 253, 38 1, 3S7 ; iii.
441, 543, 5S1.
Crabbe, the Poet, iii. 629.
Craftsman, i. 475-
Credulity, iii. 537.
Creighton, Rev. James, iii. 276, 429,
434, 441-
Cricket, John, iii. 391.
Crook, John, iii. 228, 476.
Crosby, Sarah, ii. 2S6, 289, 398, 436,
565 ; iii. 41, 68.
Crowther, Jonathan, iii. 507, 58 1.
Cud worth, William, i. 482 ; ii. 400,
527-
Cussons, George, i. 11 ; ii. 410 ; iii.
315-
Cutler, Ann, iii. 606.
" Dairyman's Daughter," The, iii. 387,
503-
Dales Circuit, iii. 631.
Dall, Robert, iii. 225, 304, 532.
Darlington, ii. 407 ; iii. 293, 535, 606.
Damey, William, i. 545 ; ii. 128 j iii.
68.
Dartmouth, Lord, ii. 509, 511 ; iii. 197.
Davenport, Rev. Thomas, iii. 383.
Deal, i. 173.
Deaths, Happy, i. 294,355,395; iii.
218, 219.
Deed of Declaration, iii. 408, 417, 465.
Delamotte, Charles, i. 117, 118, 134,
135, 140, 146, 164.
Delamotte, William, i. 299.
Delany, Dr., i. 80.
Deleznot, Rev. Mr., i. 353.
Delph, iii. 323.
Demoniacs, i. 401, 531 ; iii. 541.
Depravity, National, i. 62.
Deptford, iii. 488, 490.
Derby, ii. 398, 501 ; iii. 244.
Devizes, i. 538.
Dewsbury, iii. 275, 565.
Dewsbury Chapel Case, iii. 551.
Dickenson, Rev. Peard, iii. 621.
Dillon, John, ii. 603.
Dingle, Thomas, iii. 27.
Dispensary opened, i. 11, 525.
Diss, iii. 629.
Diversions, iii. 517.
Dixon, Rev. Mr., i. 160.
Dixon, Thomas, iii. 295, 326, 414.
Dobbin, Dr., quoted, iii. 660.
Dobinson, Mr., ii. 501.
Dodd, Dr. , ii. 23 1, 526, 597 ; iii. 237-240.
Doddridge, Dr., i. 251, 300, 383, 490,
515.516.
Dodvvell, Rev. William, iii. 356, 383.
Dogmatism, ii. 542.
Doncaster, i. 493 ; ii. 502 ; iii. 618.
Dover, ii. 339, 363, 548.
Downes, John, i. 402, 418, 441, 51S;
ii. 26, 134, 226, 450, 461.
Downes, Rev. John, ii. 342.
Dram Drinking, ii. 390, 540; iii. 44.
Dress, i. 139; ii. 390; iii. 413, 470
517,621.
"Drummer Jack," ii. 19.
Drunkenness, i. 503.
Dublin, i. 556 ; ii. 3, 35, 77, 82, 143,
236, 272, 301, 350, 445, 447, 537 J
iii. 41, 109, 202, 206, 251, 269, 313,
392, 459, 493, 542, 5 68, 623.
Dublin Chronicle, iii. 570.
Dublin Evening Post, iii. 568.
Dudley, ii. 115, 500.
Dumfries, ii. 164 ; iii. 532, 608.
Dunbar, ii. 276, 471 ; iii. 66.
Dundee, ii. 567.
Dunlop, Andrew, iii. 315.
Dunstan, Edward, i. 543.
Durham, i. 458 ; ii. 277, 407, 588 ; iii.
610.
Earthquakes, ii. 71, 212.
Easingvvold, iii. 473.
Index.
689
Easterbrook, Rev. Joseph, iii. 35, 600.
Easton, John, iii. 342.
Edinberry, ii. 35, 302.
Edinburgh, ii. 118, 470, 503, 568; iii.
63, 121, 371, 411, 534.
Ediication of Children, iii. 399.
Education of the Wesleys, i. 17.
Edwards, John, i. 537 ; ii. 241.
Edwards, Rev. Jonathan, i. 218, 500.
Eels, William, iii. 558.
Egginton, Rev. Mr., i. 407, 414.
Election, i. 311, 334, 349 ; ii. 144, 145,
536.
Electricity, ii. 161.
Elizabeth, Queen, iii. 32.
Ellison, Richard, ii. 139.
Elmoor, Micah, i. 541.
Elocution, ii. 60.
Ely, iii. 178.
Embury, Philip, ii. 146, 239, 607 ; iii.
47-
England needed Methodism, i. 173.
England, State of, i. 16, 42, 60 ; ii. 393;
iii. 185, 286, 318.
Enniskillen, iii. 153.
Entwisle, Joseph, iii. 29, 509.
Episcopacy, ii. 244, 257.
Epitaphs, iii. 457.
Epworth, i. 91, 387, 405, 45^, 488, 493.
540; ii. 8, 120, 278, 300, 327, 413,
473 ; iii- 371, 413, 539, 545> 618.
Epworth, Fire at, i. 17.
Epworth Rectory, i. 95.
Erasmus, Bishop, ii. 486.
Erskine, Rev. Ralph, i. 264.
Escrick, George, iii. 351.
Eustick, Mr., i. 507.
Evans, Caleb, iii. 187, 188.
Evans, John, i. 494.
Evans, Rev. Theophilus, ii. 229.
Everton, ii. 311, 331, 341, 397, 444.
Evesham, ii. 163, 399, 560; iii. 47.
Exeter, i. 419, 473, 554; ii. 448; iii.
302, 384, 492.
Faith, i. 52, 167, 177, 182, 186, 238,
552; ii. 216.
Falmouth, i. 471 ; ii. 279; iii. 587.
Family Religion, i. 466.
Fanaticism, i. 188, 395 ; ii. 434, 454,
460.
Fasting, i. 81 ; iii. 157, 164, 179, 2S7,
631.
Faversham, i. 173 : ii, 548.
Female Preaching, ii. 398 ; iii. 41, iii,
645.
Fenwick, John, ii. 612.
Fenwick, Michael, ii. 219, 278; iii. 351,
.39i> 522.
Ferguson, William, iii. 394.
Fenars, Earl, ii. 364.
VOL. III.
Fetter Lane .Society, i. 301, 30S.
Field Preaching, i. 227, 233, 235, 446 ;
ii- 329, 339; iii- 588, 626.
Final Perseverance, i. 313 ; ii. 135, 536.
P'itzgerald, L.idy Mary, iii. 650.
Fleetwood, William, i. 364.
Fletcher, Rev. John, ii. 220, 262, 299,
308, 437, 464, 556, 563 ; iii- 3, I9,
34. 87, 92, 95, 100, 136, 140, 147,
158, 181, 190, 209, 212, 232, 234,
247, 290, 361, 370, 416, 429, 463,
472. 480, 487-.
Fleury, Claude, ii. 64.
Fleury, Rev. Mr., iii. 113.
Foggs Weekly Journal, i. 85, 86.
"Fool of Quality," iii. 342.
Foote, Samuel, ii. 366, 591.
Fothergill, Dr., ii. 161, 174, 189.
Foundery, Old, i. 271, 551 ; ii. 498 ;
iii. 220, 303.
Fox, John. ii. 421.
Francke's Orphanage, i. 199.
Francks, Samuel, ii. 345 ; iii. 155, 207.
Franklin, Benjamin, ii. 161,
Frederica, i. 124, 131, 134.
"Free Grace," Sermon, l 317, 320,
.323-
Free, Rev. Dr., ii. 321.
Freedom of Speech, i. 497.
French Invasion, threatened, 1. 438 ; ii.
323-
French Language, ii. 260.
French Prisoners, ii. 339.
French Revolution, iii. 597.
Frome, i. 473 ; ii. 190 ; iii. 28.
Fulneck, i. 544.
Funeral, Irish, ii. 79-
Furley, Rev. Samuel, ii, 1S6, 450,
Gainsborough, ii, 330, 331, 413, 502,
Gallatin, Colonel, ii. 117, 1S9.
Gambold, Rev. John, i. 68, 70, 108,
179, 281, 337, 339, 361 ; iii. 222.
Garden, Rev. Mr., i. 139, 326,
Gardiner, Lady, ii, 470.
Gardner, John, ii. 253.
Garretson, Freeborn, iii. 461, 484, 566,
Gateshead, ii. 328.
Gawksham, ii. 275.
Gayer, Mr., iii. 203.
GcntlemaiCs Magazine, i. 357.
Georgia, i. 109-117, 120, i^.
Georgian Mission, i. 169.
German Methodists, i. 9.
Ghosts, i. 22.
Gib, Rev, Adam, i, 374.
Gibraltar, iii. 46.
Gibson, Bishop, i. 207, 217, 244, 454,
548.
Gifted Itinerants, ii. 84.
Gilbert, Francis, ii. 298, 535; iii. 151.
V Y
690
Index.
Gilbert, Miss Mary, ii. 535.
Gilbert, Nathaniel, ii. 297, 535 ; iii.
273-
Gilbert, Nicholas, 11. 382.
Gill, Rev. Dr., ii. 148, 191.
Gillies, Rev. John, ii. 164, 165, 276,
328 ; iii. 9.
Girl, Starving, i. 7 1.
Giving, ii. 516.
Glasbrook, James, ii. 353, 587.
Glasgow, ii. 164, 276, 328, 568 ; iii. 9,
533-
Glass, John, ii. 293.
Glenorchy, Lady, ii. 47 1, 604 ; iii. 64.
Gloucester, iii. 6, 503.
Godfathers, ii. 148.
Goldney, Edward, iL 375.
Goodday, Rev. Thomas, ii. 334, 335,
606.
Goodenough, Matthew, iii. 259.
Gordon, Lord George, iii. 323, 341.
Gordon Riots, iii. 318.
Gospel Magazine, iii. 89, 105, 179, 233,
237, 256, 314.
Gospel Preaching, iii. 135.
Grant, Sir Archibald, ii. 404,
Grant, Sir Lodowick, iii. 412.
Grantham, iii. 356.
Grantham, Rfv. Thomas, i. 366.
Granville, Mary, i. 74.
Graves, Rev. C. G., i. 339, 382, 391,
406, 414.
Green, Rev. Dr., ii. 370.
Green, Rev. Thomas, ii. 217.
Greenwood, Parson, iiL 352, 553-555'
Greenwood, Paul, ii. 38 1.
Gregory, Dr., iii. 122.
Grey, Rev. Zachary, i. 325, 476.
(iriffith, Rev. Thomas, ii. 229.
Grimsby, i. 406, 488; ii. 11, 278, 327,
502 ; iii. 294.
Grimshaw, Rev. William, i. 536, 544;
ii. 13, 17, 165, 166, 204, 211, 245,
275, 327. 363. 384. 387, 412, 415.
423, 478, 573 ;.i'i- 373.
Grou, Monsieur, ii. 11.
Guier, Philip, ii. 144, 146.
Guisborough, ii. 409.
Guiseley, ii. 330.
Gwennap, i. 524, 540 ; ii. 289 ; iii. 275,
364, 588.
Ilaime, John, i. 494 ; ii. 164, 190.
Hales, Rev. Dr., i. 265.
Halifax, i. 544; ii. 12, 573; iii. 126,
291, 606.
Hall, Westley, i. 68, 99, 117, 132, 285,
337, 496, 561 ; ii-87; iii. 212.
Hall, Mrs., iii. 567.
Halyburton, Thomas, i. 287.
Hamilton, Dr. James, iii. 122, 163, 584.
Hammet, William, iii. 441.
Hampson, John, ii. 102, 189, 226, 381,
398, 511. 579; iii- 251, 277, 298,
334, 420, 423, 424, 449, 534, 552.
Hampton, i. 426,
Hanby, Thomas, ii. 470, 560; iii. 71,
85, n8, 417, 441, 574, 602.
Harman, John, ii. 373, 498.
Harris, Howel, i. 220, 275, 277, 299,
307, 315, 321, 342, 349, 375, 402,
535 ; ii. 68, 154, 236, 479, 555, 60S;
iii. 128.
Harrison, Hannah, ii. 421 ; iii. 41.
Harrison, Nathaniel, i. 384.
Hart, Joseph, i. 364.
Hartlepool, ii. 277, 330.
Hartley, Rev. Thomas, ii. 518.
Haverfordwest, ii. 595.
Haweis, Rev. Dr., ii. 463, 499 ; iii. 34.
Hawes, Dr., i. 564.
Hawnby, ii. 277.
Haworth, ii. 12, 33, 69, 155, 275, 330,
363, 4.12, 573 ; iii. 292, 325.
Hayes, ii. 70.
Hayes, Eleanor, i. 165.
Hayfield, ii. 195.
Healey, John, i. 440 ; ii. 2.
Hebrew Points, ii. 260.
Heck, Barbara, ii. 239, 607 ; iii. 47.
Hclme, John, ii. 455.
Helmsley, ii. 335, 473, 502.
Helstone, ii. 218, 585.
Heptonstall, ii. 18, 141.
Heresy, ii. 244.
Hermhuth, i. 199, 202-207.
Hertford, iii. 28.
Hervey, Rev. James, i. 68, 132, 133;
ii. 194, 227, 261, 293, 315, 526, 535 ;
iii. 56.
Hervey, T., i. 252.
Hewgill, William, ii. 277.
Hexham, i. 507.
Hey, William, iii. 363.
Hicks, Rev. Mr., ii. 310.
High Churchism, i. 95, 147, 152, 160,
496.
Hill, Rev. Rowland, iii. 106, 137, 255,
258, 266.
Hill, Sir Richard, iii. 32, 34, 54, 75,
106, 136, 159, 179, 266.
Hilton, John, iii. 245.
Hinckley, iii. 295, 392.
Hitchcock, Rev. Dr., ii. 428.
Hitchins, Thomas, i. 524.
Hoblin, Rev. Mr., i. 417.
Hobson, Elizabeth, iii. lO.
Hodges, Rev. John, i. 442.
Hodgson, Ralph, iii. 536.
Holder, George, iii. 362, 593, 631.
Holland, i. 196; iii. 393. 487.
"Honest Munchin," i. 413.
I?idex.
691
Hooker, Mr., i. 326.
Hopkey, Miss, i. 146-149, 169,
Hopper, Christopher, i. 543, 545 ; ii.
52, 75, 118, 254, 381, 383, 404, 407,
462, 612 ; iii. 152, 169, 297, 355, 382.
Homcastle, ii. 327, 413, 566.
Home, Bishop, ii. 457 ; iii. 34.
Home, Melville, i. 11.
Horton, John, iii. 17, 650, 655.
Hoskins, John, iii. 176.
Hosmer, John, ii. 408.
Hospital, Methodist, proposed, ii. 360.
How, John, ii. 290.
Howard, John^ iii. 495, 581.
Huddersfield, ii. 274, 414, 541 ; iii.
292.
Hull, ii. 139, 330, 410; iii. 473, 538,
611.
Humane Society, Royal, iii. 251.
Hume, David, iii. 121.
Humphreys, Dr., 1. 141.
Humphreys, Joseph, i. 346, 402.
Hunt, John, ii. 606.
Huntingdon, Lady, i. 339, 341, 369,
381 ; ii. 20, 68, 245, 326, 337, 364,
448, 462, 508, 556, 604 ; iii. 2, 34,
59, 73, 88, 92, 431.
Hurd, Dr., ii. 493.
Husk, General, i. 492.
Hutchins, Mr., i. 179.
Hutchinson, John, ii. 260; iii. 4.91,
Hutton, James, i. 108, 132, 181, 182,
236, 298, 300, 307, 342, 420, 477 ;
ii. 158, 159, 220, 222.
Hutton, Mrs., i. 189.
Hutton, Rev. Mr., i. 189.
Hutton Rudby, ii. 409, 570,
Hymn Book, Methodist, ii. 181 ; iii.
343-
Hymn Singing in Scotland, ii. 164.
Hymn Writing, i. 397.
"Hymns and Sacred Poems," i. 290.
I 'Anson, Mr., ii. 358.
Ilkestone, iii. 475.
Imputed Righteousness, ii. 458, 469,
551 ; iii. 14.
Infidelity and Popery, i. 140.
Infidelity at 0.\ford, i. 65.
Ingham, Benjamin, i. 68, 108, 117, I18,
122, 126, 127, 135, 137, 196, 198,
250, 277, 299, 306, 328, 338 ; ii. 116,
164, 166, 534; iii. 255.
Innys, Rev. Mr., i. 538.
Inverness, iii. 65, 293, 507.
Ireland, i. 556.
Irish Methodists, iii. 42, 227.
Irish Primitive Methodists, i. 6.
Isle of Man, iii. 228, 241, 354, 593.
Isle of Wight, i. 12 1, 171 ; ii. 304 ;
iii. 386.
Itinerancy, iii. 167, 168, 561.
Itinerant Preachers Advised, ii. 163,
199.
Itinerant Preachers in 1 744, i. 459.
Jackson, Daniel, iii. 598.
Jackson, Thomas, ii. 1 14.
Jaco, Peter, i. 555 ; iii. 297.
Jane, John, ii. 75.
Janitor, Grateful, i. 24.
Jarratt, Rev. Mr., iii. 15 1.
Jenkins, Herbert, i. 537.
Jephson, Rev. Alexander, ii. 369.
Johnson, Dr. Samuel, i. 51, 61 ; iii.
185, 238, 294, 406.
Johnson, John, ii. 359, 383.
Johnson, Miss, iii. 272.
Johnson, Thomas, ii. 416.
Jones, Jacob, iii. 651.
Jones, Rev, Griffith, i. 221.
Jones, Rev. John, ii. 11, 202, 203, 358,
486, 507 ; iii. 205.
Jones, Rev. Thomas, ii. 324.
Jumpers, Welsh, ii. 480.
Justification, i. 52, 306, 443, 497.
Keighley, i. 544 ; ii. 330 ; iii. 243, 289.
Keighley, Joshua, iii. 441, 507.
Keith, Jeannie, i. 542 ; ii. 52, 166.
Kelso, ii. 276 ; iii. 371.
Kempis, Thomas a, i. 33-36, 106; iii.
63 r.
Kendal, ii, 164, 505, 535.
Kennicott, Dr., i. 448.
Kennington Common, i. 228.
Kershaw, James, ii. 531, 535 ; iii. 362.
Kilham, Alexander, iii. 408, 504.
Kinchin, Charles, i. 67, 225.
King, Archbishop, iii. 643.
King, John, iii. 207,
King, Lord, i. 508.
Kingsford, William, iii. 562.
Kingswood, i. 227, 268, 519; ii. 34,
75, 86, 89, 290, 425; iii. 110.
Kingswood School, i. 269 ; ii. "J, 121,
171, 241, 287, 297, 454, 559 ; iii. 51,
70, 129, 367, 396-400.
Kinnard, iii. 41.
Kinsale, ii. 147, 354 ; iii. 460.
Kirkby, Rev. John, ii. 70.
Kirkham, Robert, i. 49.
Knaresborough, ii. 411.
Knight, Titus, ii. 573.
Knox, Alexander, ii. 536, 577,
Koker, Dr., i. 196 ; ii. 57,
Lackington, James, i, 550.
Lacy, David, ii. 275.
Lambeth, iii. 217, 649.
Lancaster, John, iii. 416.
Lancaster, Rev. Nathaniel, ii. 616.
692
Index.
Land, Rev. Tristam, i. 242.
Lloyd, Rev. David, iii. 402.
Landau Church, i. 458.
Lloyd, Rev. Richard, ii. 79.
Lane End, iii. 41 1, 472.
JAoyd's Evening Post, ii. 348, 3SS
428.
Laneast, i. 458.
Logic, ii. 90.
Langhome, Dr., ii. 213, 455.
London Chronicle, ii. 460.
Langston, Mr., ii. 375.
London Circuit Plan in 1792, iii. .
223.
Languages, ii. 135.
London Daily Post, ii. 58.
Larwood, Samuel, ii. 187.
London Evening Post, i. 473.
Latrobe, Benjamin, i. 556.
London in 1739, i. 213.
Laughing, i. 293.
London Magazine, ii. 292, 427.
Launceston, ii. 190, 218, 361.
London Methodist Chapels, ii. 89
; iii.
Lavington, Bishop, ii. 23, 91, 134,
150.
216.
Law, WiUiam, i. 50, 83, 99, 132,
185-
London Methodist Day School, i.
550-
187, 284, 330, 399; ii. 63,
265,
London Methodist Society, i. 420,
461,
269 ; iii. 36.
489.
Lay Preaching, i. 201, 276; ii. 246.
Londonderry, ii. 536 ; iii. 42, 202.
Learning, Wesley on, i. 367 ; ii. 64,
Longden, Henry, iii. 474.
491.
Longridge, Michael, iii. 604.
Leatherhead, iii. 650.
Lots, Casting, i. 147, 232, 323, 53
I.
Lee, Thomas, ii. 572 ; iii. 326, 32
7-
Loughborough, iii. 69.
Leeds, 1. 490, 495. S'S ; "• 2, 33.
120,
Lovefeast at Fetter Lane, i. 229.
139, 166, 316, 399, 448, 584 ; iii. 45,
Lovefeasts, Methodist, ii. 341, 53?
.
68, 126, 206, 270, 292, 356, 41 _
)•
Lowes, Matthew, iii. 6, 70, 71, 78
.
Leek, iii. 118.
Lowestoft, ii. 512 ; iii. 628.
Lefevre, Mrs., ii. 109.
Lowth, Bishop, ii. 596 ; iii. 251, 332.
Leicester, ii. 170, 28 1.
Loyalty, Methodist, i. 439, 440,
491 ;
Leifchild, Rev. Dr., iii. 48S.
iii. 235, 236, 286.
Leighton Buzzard, iii. 1 14.
Lunell, Mr., i. 557 ; ii. 5.
Leith, iii. 123.
Lurgan, ii. 303, 445 ; iii. 202.
Leland, Dr. Thomas, ii. 493.
Lutheran Reformation, i. 2.
Lending Society, i. 550.
Luton, iii. 114.
Leominster, i. 524.
Lynn, iii. 629.
Letters for first time published, i. 26, 27,
29. 37, 94, 131. 132, 136, 137,
224,
McAllum, Duncan, iii. 272, 293,
497.
233, 306, 3i2;ii. 112, 167,201,
253,
507, 565-
281, 360, 416, 503, 508, 563,
564,
Macaulay, Lord, iii. 660.
612 ; iii. 3, 5, 31, 54, 55, 69
70,
Macclesfield, ii. 448; iii. 8, 165,
370,
72,78,83,88,95, 150, 177,204,
212,
393, 404, 493, 501. 605.
225, 230, 273, 277, 284, 288,
289,
M 'Donald, James, iii. 630.
293, 304, 315, 324, 336, 337,
349,
M 'Geary, John, iii. 493.
355, 358, 376, 377, 378, 382,
392,
M 'Geary, Thomas, iii. 399.
404, 408, 428, 442, 454, 467,
477,
M'Gowan, John, ii. 407 ; iii. 34,
314-
4S2, 486, 491, 497, 507, 522,
525,
Machiavel, Nicholas, i. 134.
532, 542-544, 546, 565, 580,
590,
M 'Kersey, J., iii. 466.
592, 598, 601, 605, 621, 632,
633,
Mackford, Mr., ii. 14.
643, 649.
Mackie, George, iii. 134.
Leven, Lord, iii. 412.
M'Nab, Alexander, iii. 84, 85,
303,
Lewen, Miss, ii. 588.
348, 559.
Ley, William, ii. 353 ; iii. 17.
Madan, Rev. Martin, ii. 283, 448,
499,
Leytonstone, ii. 287.
556.
Libraries, i. 499.
Maddox, Mr., iii. 421.
Licensing Chapels, iii. 511.
Madeley, ii. 299 ; iii. 290, 370,
411,
Lichfield, Bishop of, i. 61.
472, 603.
Limerick, ii. 36, 37, 78, 354, 448; iii
460.
Maldon, ii. 300.
Lincoln, iii. 327, 617.
Malton, ii. 570.
Lisbon, Earthquake at, ii. 223.
Manchester, i. 92, 174, 545; ii.
138,
Lisburn, ii. 240, 445 ; iii. 1 54.
164, 327, 399, 448, 478, 540
; 111.
Liskeard, ii. 290.
"9, 313, 337, 350, 353, 393,
411,
List of Itinerants, ii. 126.
416, 496, 605.
Liverpool, ii. 196, 274, 301, 328,
448,
Mann, John, iii. 544.
566, 600; iii. 9, 486, 590.
Manners, John, ii. 415, 570«
Index.
69:
Manners, Nicholas, ii. 306 ; iii. 559.
Manning, Rev. Charles, i. 551; ii. 70, lOi.
March, Miss, iii. 177.
Marienbourn, i. 197.
Marriage with deceased wife's sister, ii.
259-
Marriages, Improper, iii. 364, 640.
Marriott, Thomas, i. 465.
Marvellous Escape, iii. 169.
Mary, Queen of Scotland, iii. 32.
Maskew, Jonathan, ii. 41 1 ; iii. 68.
Mason, John, ii. 170; iii. 598.
Mason, William, iii. 75.
Massiot, James, ii. 304.
Mathematics, ii. 389.
Mather, Alexander, ii. 184, 488; iii.
155, 204, 327, 375, 441, 478, 553,
558, 575-
Maud, Rev. J., i. 474.
Maxfield, Thomas, i. 274, 302, 369,
454, 470; ii- 381, 432, 436, 440,
450, 454, 462, 464, 474, 482, 486,
507, 556; iii. 26, 59, 115, 261, 296.
Maxwell, Lady, ii. 471, 503, 603; iii.
40, 65, 84, 86, 561.
Mayer, Matthew, ii. 328, 473 ; iii. 290.
Mayor, First Methodist, ii. 274.
Mayor of Grampound, ii. 290.
Means of Grace, i. 304.
Mears, William, iii. 622.
Meek, Jenny, i. 487.
Meggot, Samuel, ii. 472.
Mellar I3am, ii. 142.
Meriton, Rev. John, i. 442, 458, 539;
ii. 3.
Merryweather, George, ii. 408, 415,
565, 612 ; iii. 69, 83.
Methodism, Growth of, ii. 538.
Methodism's first Lay Preacher, i. 274.
Methodist Episcopal Church, i. 8.
Methodist JSIanifestoes, i. 484 ; ii. 533.
Methodist, Name of, i. 67, 331.
Methodist New Connexion, i. 5.
Methodist Newspapers, i. il.
Methodism, Perpetuation of, iii. 49.
Methodist Protestant Church, i. 9.
Methodist Statistics, i. 7, 9; ii. 608,
609; iii. 330, 620.
Methodists not perfect, ii. 540, 5S0.
Middleton, Dr. Conyers, ii. 34, 61.
Middleton, John, ii. 409.
Midsomer Norton, iii. 231.
Mill, Peter, iii. 573.
Millard, Henry, i. 453.
'Millenarianism, ii. 220, 521 ; iii. 544.
Miller, Robert, ii. 483 ; iii. 626.
Milner, Rev. J., ii. 1 16, 141, 164, 166,330.
Milton, John, ii. 495.
Ministerial Responsil)ility, iii. 121.
Ministers, Unconverted, iii. 564.
Minulla, ii. 304.
Miracles, i. 531 ; ii. 87.
Missionary Collection, First Methodist,
ii. 606.
Missionary Report, First Methodist, iii.
480.
Missionaries, Wesley on, i. 135, 142;
ii. 606.
Missions, Methodist, iii. 46; iii. 272-
274, 480-484.
Missions to India proposed, iii. 483.
Mitchell, Thomas, ii. 44, 381 ; iii. 68.
"Mitre," The, ii. 241, 254.
Molther, Philip II., i. 297, 301, 302.
Monmouth, iii. 339.
Monro, Dr., iii. 122.
Montanists, ii. 87.
Moon, Elizabeth, ii. 409.
Moore, Henry, i. 147, 350; ii. lOi, 1 15 ;
iii. 16, 224, 246, 441, 543, 566, 575,
598, 609, 616, 647.
Moore, William, iii. 458.
Moorfields, i. 214.
Moorhouse, Michael, iii. 467.
Moravian Missions, i. 300.
Moravianism, i. 205, 206, 210, 281 ; ii.
155, 467; iii- 72-
Moravians, i. 121, 126, 195, 279, 310,
337,477,478, 535; ii- 58,95-
Morgan, James, ii. 358 ; iii. 16, 23, 41.
Morgan, R., i. 131.
Morgan, William, i. 67, 84.
Morley, ii. 331.
Morley, Dr., i. 58.
Morning Preaching, iii. 22, 167, 410.
Morpeth, ii. 329.
Morris, James, ii. 315.
Moss, Richard, i. 471, 482 ; ii. II.
Murgatroyd, John, i. 3S5.
Murlin, John, ii. 381 ; iii. 292.
Murray, Grace, i. 541, 543; ii. 12,45-56.
Music, ii. 500.
Musselburgh, ii. I18, 276.
Myles, William, iii. 154, 56S, 572, 583.
Mystics, The, i. 133; ii. 519.
Nantwich, ii. 163; iii. I18.
National Alarm, iii. 267, 286.
National Churches, i. 509.
National Commotion, ii. 234 ; iii. 39.
National Distress and its Remedies, iii.
130.
Naval and Military Bible Society, iii.
3I5-
Neath, i. 525 ; iii. 20.
Nelson, John, i. 369, 381, 383, 418,
420, 441, 458, 507, 544 ; il. 53, 169,
3S3, 573 ; iii- 70, 373-
Nervousness, iii. 274, 489.
New P,irth, i. 230.
New Mills, iii. 9.
New York, ii. 607 ; iii. 47.
694
Index.
Newark, iii. 327, 491, 549.
Newbury, iii. 29, 62, 471.
Newcastle on Tyne, i. 385, 392, 403-
405, 425, 431, 461, 483, 487, 490,
494, 513, 541 ; "• 12, 33, 49, 56,
112, 117, 120, 140, 166, 2t2, 328,
406, 418, 470, 503, 537, 567, 569,
595, 603, 606; iii. 7, 17, 66, 123,
169, 202, 215, 241, 294, 355, 412,
573, 604, 607, 608.
Newfoundland, iii. 25, 176, 458,
Newgate Prison, ii. 396.
Newlyn, i. 555 ; ii. 25.
Newman, Miss, ii. 560.
Newry, ii. 445, 600.
Newspaper, First Methodist, i. 346.
Newton, Rev. John, ii. 295, 314, 349,
363 ; iii. 33.
Nitschmann, David, i. 1 17, 119, 146.
Nitschmann, Hannah, ii. I57.
Norris, Dr. John, i. 367.
North, Lord, iii. 197.
Northallerton, i. 486, 487.
Northampton, ii. 587.
Northtawton, ii. 544.
Northwich, i. 547.
Norton, Mr., ii. 256.
Norwich, ii. 123, 189, 218, 273, 290,
309, 313, 317, 325, 333, 342, 348,
381, 397, 444, 482, 512, 534, 615;
ui. 178, 405, 465, 629.
Norwood, ii. 290.
" Notes on New Testament, " ii. 184, 226.
"Notes on Old Testament," ii. 552.
Nottingham, i. 339, 440, 507, 518 ; ii.
514,560; iii. 409, 514.
Nova Scotia, iii. 401, 497, 545.
Novels, iii. 172, 450.
Nowell, Dr., iii. 32, 54, 108.
Oastler, Robert, iii. 424.
Oddie, James, iii. 70, 71, 420, 559. 574.
Oglethorpe, General, i. lio, 117, 118,
122, 129, 136, 146.
Okeley, Francis, ii. 301.
Oldham, iii. 290, 371.
Oldham, Adam, iii. 119.
O'Leary, Arthur, iii. 320.
Oliphant, Lawrence, ii. 190.
Oliver, John, iii. 71.
Olivers, Thomas, ii. 489, 588 ; iii. 41,
104, 106-108, 140, 156, 158, 166,
181, 188, 259, 2S5.
Oratorios, ii. 499.
Ordination, i. 510.
Ordination of Methodist Preachers, ii.
202, 487; iii. 311, 331, 427.
Ordination Vows, i. 100.
Original Sin, i. 443 ; ii. 294.
Orphan House, Newcastle, i. 393, 519,
543-
Orphanage, Methodist, ii. 517.
Orton, Rev. Job, iii. 19.
Osborn, Thomas, ii. 359.
Osmotherley, i. 485, 487, 490, 541,
544; ii. 12, 107, 140, 212, 277,
409.
Otley, ii. 330, 410, 416.
Oulton, John, ii. 370.
Owen, Miss, iii. 129.
Oxford, i. 174, 179, 182, 224; iii. 29,
32.
Oxford Methodists, 66-74, 83-88, 90,
92, 106, 182, 361.
Padiham, ii. 275 ; iii. 291.
Palatines, ii. 146, 238, 354.
Paoli, General, iii. 454.
Papists, i., 485 ; ii. 384; iii. 318-323.
Parkhurst, Dr., ii. 180.
Pastoral Visitation, i. 420, 446 ; ii.
313, 580; iii. 23, 125, 164.
Pateley, ii. 572 ; iii. 326.
Pawson, John, ii. 112, 443, 511, 547;
iii. 163, 221, 297, 300, 310-312, 420,
423. 428, 441, 442, 496, 529, 557,
573, 582.
Payne, John, ii. 493.
Pearse, Colonel, iii. 460.
Pearson, George, iii. 8.
Pebworth, iii. 7.
Peel, Sir Robert, iii. 499.
Pembroke, iii. 20, no.
Penitents, i. 445.
Penn, Rev. James, ii. 456.
Pennington, William, ii. 532.
Penrith, iii. 327.
Pensford, i. 236.
Perfection, Christian, i. 88, 288, 313,
3 '6, 334, 339, 349, 365, 444, 461,
49S, 535, 553; ii- 215, 232, 306,
346, 399, 4'3, 4>6, 43 1, 439, 442,
447, 449-453, 461, 465, 482, 494,
507, 535, 546, 550, 562, 593, 596;
iii. 12, 14, 22, 26, 59, 121, 462, 625,
633-
Periam, Joseph, i. 247.
Perronet, Charles, i. 559 ; ii. 2, 34,
84, 109, 189, 200, 201, 206, 381,
548.
Perronet, Edward, ii. 57, 84, loi, 104,
200, 230, 241, 254, 419.
Perronet, Rev. Vincent, i. 512, 525 ;
ii. 6, 8, 54, 62, 92, 104, 107, 108, 129,
130, 149, 179, 230, 298, 467, 549;
iii. 53,96, 122, 296, 390, 463.
Persecution, i. 236, 238, 296, 331,356,
396, 425, 453, 470, 547 ; ii. 2, 37,
272, 291, 353.
Persecutors, Death of, ii. 278.
Perth, iii. 10, 120, 168.
Index.
695
Peters, Sarah, ii. 27, 28.
Philanthropy, i. 294, 332, 352 ; ii.
348, 467 ; iii. 458, 491.
Philips, Sir John, i. 132.
Pickering, ii. 570.
Pickles, Joseph, ii. 41 1.
Piercy, George, ii. 607.
Piers, Rev. Henry, i. 375, 427.
Pilkington, Mrs., ii. 77.
Pilmoor, Joseph, iii. 47, 54, 17S.
Pine, William, iii. iSS, 211.
Piracy, i. 465.
Pitt, Right lion. William, iii. 450.
Placey, ii. 276.
Plagiarism, i. 366.
Plainness, ii. 183.
Playdell, Mrs., iii. 532.
Plendelieth, Rev. Mr., iii. 13.
Plummer, Stephen, ii. 171.
Plymouth, i. 554; ii. 190,361, 5S5 ;
iii. 28, 384, 459, 492, 587.
Pocklington, ii. 140, 278.
Poor House, Methodist, i. 549.
Popery, iii. 315, 318, 388.
Poplar, iii. 115.
Port Isaac, i. 555 ; ii. 361.
Portadown, ii. 600.
Portarlington, ii. 37, 78, 82, 302, 353,
447 ; I'l- 42.
Portsmouth, ii. 170.
Potter, Archbishop, i. 43 ; ii. 16 ; iii.
571-
Potter, Rev. Mr., ii. 317.
Potto, ii. 409.
Power, Autocratic, ii. 577 ; iii. 305, 3 9.
Prayer Answered, i. 232 ; iii. 204.
Prayer Book, Methodist, iii. 548.
Prayer Meetings, iii. 135, 522, 623.
Preachers' Allowances, iii. 550.
Preachers, how to mend, ii. 582.
Preachers, First ISIethodist, iii. 455.
Preaching, Extempore, iii. 563.
Preaching, Gospel, ii. 130.
Preaching the Law, ii. 84.
Preaching, Lay, i. 369 ; ii. 245.
Preaching, Methodist, i. 515.
Predestination, i. 40, 318, 319, 366;
ii. 148 ; iii. 14, 54.
Preston, iii. 354.
Preston Pans, ii. 567.
Pretender, The, i. 42, 4S9.
Price, Dr., iii. 234.
Primitive Methodists, i. 6 ; ii. 609.
Prince Edward's Island, iii. 66.
Pritchard, John, ii. 547.
Protestant Association, iii. 318.
Publications, Anti-AIethodist, i. 325,
364, 426, 454, 474, 513; ii. iSo,
217, 229, 270, 291, 367, 427, 455,
489. 525. 537.550. 590, 616; iii.
35. 56, 79. 255, 261, 314.
Publications, Wesley's, i. 90, 105, 210,
288, 333, 365, 397, 430, 463, 500,
529, 562 ; li. 29, 60, 89, 135, 142,
147, i8r, 191, 220, 264, 293, 317,
345. 389. 429, 457, 494. 532, 550,
593, 617 ; iii. 36, 57, 80, 112, 145,
161, 182, 210, 234, 260, 267, 280,
315, 342, 366, 387, 406, 455, 469,
488, 515, 593, 633.
Pul)low, iii. 129.
Punctuality, iii. 539.
Quakerism, i. 489 ; ii. 30 ; iii. 245, 246.
(Quarterly Meetings, ii. 42.
Quarterly Visitation, i. 380; iii. 514.
Questions to Candidates, ii. 583.
Quick, Catherine, i. 416.
Quincy, Rev. Samuel, i. 114, 126,
127.
Rankin, Thomas, ii. 507, 532, 545 ; iii.
69. 97. 194, 248, 297, 299, 300, 429,
441, 510, 566, 567, 575, 654.
Reading (Berks.), ii. 2i8.-
Reading recommended, ii. 515 ; iiL
359, 632.
Redemption, Universal, i. 535.
Reece, Richard, iii. 29, 509.
Reeves, Jonathan, i. 453, 454, 473.
Religion, how to Revive, iii. 22.
Religious Cheerfulness, i. 138.
Religious Reformations Compared, i.
533-
Religious Revivals, L 2 1 8, 220, 222,
223, 467; iii. 124.
Religious Societies, i. 254.
Relly, James, i. 536 ; ii. 240, 400.
Relly, John, i. 537.
Renty, Monsieur de, 1. 366.
Repentance, i. 52, 497 ; iii. 24.
Reprobation, i. 317 ; ii. 144, 145.
Reproving Sin, iii. 622.
Reynolds, John, ii. 484.
Richardson, Rev. John, ii. 507, 573 ;
iii. 222, 299.
Rich Methodists Warned, iii. 456, 516,
519. 563. 594. 636.
Riches, Danger of, iii. 347.
Richmond (Yorkshire), iii. 18.
Ridley, Mr., i. 491, 494,
Rimius, Henry, ii. 156.
Riots in Staffordshire, L 407.
Ripon, ii. 569 ; iii. 326.
Ritchie, Miss, ii. 411; iii. 243. 337,
461, 621, 650, 651.
Ritualism, i. 168.
Robe, Rev. James, i. 222.
Robetrs, Thomas, iii. 621, 647.
Robertson, Dr., iii. 120.
Robin Hood's Bay, ii. 277, 330, 409.
Robinson, Archbishop, i. 277.
Robinson, Henry Crabb, iii. 628.
696
Index.
Rochdale, ii. 57.
Rochester, iii. 622.
Rodda, Richard, iii. 248, 500, 574,
590.
Rogers, Hester Anne, iii. 166, 371,
392, 650.
Rogers, James, iii. 178, 348, 459, 625,
649, 650, 654.
Rolvenden, ii. 359.
Romaine, Rev. William, ii. 219, 277,
412,448, 459, 463, 534, 556; iii. 75.
Romley, Rev. Mr., i. 405, 45S, 488,
493; ii- II.
Roquet, Rev. James, ii. 11, 546: iii.
16, 188.
Rotherham, ii. 69, 278, 331, 412, 502.
Roughlee, ii. 14.
Rousseau, iii. 58.
Rowell, Jacob, ii. 144, 381, 565.
Rules of Methodist Societies, i. 430.
Rutherford, Thomas, iiL 304, 623.
Rutherforth, Rev. Dr., ii. 490; iii. 36.
Ryan, Sarah, ii. 109, 285, 297, 517,
562.
Rye, iii. 566.
Ryles, Mr., iii. 8.
SabbathDesecration, i. 501 ; iii. 366, 372.
Sacraments, i. 81, 353, 501 ; ii. 263;
iii. 574-576.
Sagar, William, iii. 243.
Salisbury, ii. 87, 218 ; iii. 52, 503.
Salmon, Mr., i. 117 ; iii. 118.
Saltzburghers, i. 112.
Salvation by Faith, i. 183, 238.
Sandeman, Robert, ii. 293, 534 ; iii. 3.
Sandemanianism, ii. 293, 550.
Saunderson, Hugh, iii. 42.
Savannah, i. 123, 126, 128, 161, 163.
Scarborough, ii. 330, 410, 509; iiL
413-
Schism, ii. 244.
Schisms, i. 325, 344.
Scilly Islands, i. 419.
Scotch Funerals, iii. 167.
Scotch National Assembly, ii. 567.
Scotland, Methodism in, ii. 119.
Scots Magazine, i. 239, 357,
Scott, Captain, ii. 587.
Scott, Francis, ii. 12.
Scott, Sir Walter, iii. 371.
Seabury, Dr. Samuel, iii. 440,
Seeker, Archbishop, i, 500.
Selby, ii. 327.
Select Societies, i. 445.
Sellon, Rev. Waher, ii. 8, li, 201,
281, 359, 531 ; iii- 54, 55, 81, 87,
91, 108, 117, 140, 180, 408, 431.
Separation from Church of England, il
198, 200, 241, 279, 317, 380, 402,
416, 444, 477, 526, 575 ; iii. 12, 18,
23, 270, 278, 330, 363, 391, 413,
431, 436, 449, 465, 468, 477, 488,
490, 496, 511, 523, 534, 542, 545,
547, 569, 613, 634.
Sermons before University, i. 362, 448.
Settle, iii. 242.
Sevenoaks, i. 376, 525 ; iii. 562.
Seward, William, i. 342.
Shackerley, ii. 18.
Shadford, George, iii. 175, 248.
Shaftesbury, ii. 86, 87, 218, 5S5.
Sharpc, Granville, iii. 114.
Shaw, Mrs., iii. 465.
Sheemess, ii. 615.
Shefiield, i. 390, 425, 48S ; ii. 139,
278, 328, 331, 501, 561 ; iii. 48,
328, 336, 348, 474-
Shent, William, ii. 118, 595 ; iii. 289,
296.
Shepherd, Mr., i. 416, 418.
"Shepherd of Salisbury Plain," iii. 53.
Shepton Mallet, i. 524 ; ii. i, 2, 86 ;
iii. 590.
Sherlock, Bishop, ii. 72.
Shields, i. 404 ; ii. 329 ; iii. 18, 573.
Shirley, Dady Frances, ii. 32, 194.
Shirley, Rev. Walter, ii. 337, 364, 380;
iii- 65, 93.
Shoreham, i. 507, 525 ; iii. 53.
Short Prayers, ii. 577.
Shrewsbury, iii. 19, 449.
Silvester, Rev. Tipping, i. 209.
Simeon, Rev. Charles, iii. 454, 510.
Simpson, Rev. David, iii. 165, 336,
370, 404, 501-
Simpson, Rev. Mr., i. 302, 303, 338,
476.
Simpson, Thomas, iii. 397.
Simpson, William, iii. 4S6, 522, 542.
Singing, i. 398; ii. 429; iii. 20, 22,
352, 502.
Skelton, Charles, ii. 36, 129, 134, 187,
241.
Skerret, Rev. Dr., i. 239,
Skircoat Green, i. 513.
Slanders, i. 357.
Slavery, ii. 132; iii. 114, 183, 650.
Sleep, i. 72 ; iii. 357, 359.
Sligo, 11. 354, 445 ; iii. 269.
Slocomb, John, i. 440.
Smalbroke, Bishop, i. 504.
Smith, Christopher, ii. 408.
Smith, John, ii. 350.
Smith, Rev. Haddon, iii. 80.
Smith, Rev. Thomas, iii. 337.
Smith, William, ii. 112; iii. 16, 169,
607.
Smyth, Agnes, iii. 241.
Smyth, Aquila, i. 326.
Smyth, Rev. Edward, iii. 241, 304,
313. 454, 494, 571, 572, 583, 624.
Index.
697
Smuggling, ii. 277, 449, 515, 617; iii.
215.
Snowsfields Chapel, i. 421.
Snuff taking, ii. 540.
Societies, Methodist, i. 278, 444.
Society for Reformation of Manners, ii.
468.
Society Meetings, i. 446.
Socinianism, ii. 295.
Soldiers, i. 432 ; ii. 231, 237.
South Leigh, ii. 498.
South Sea Bubble, i. 43.
Southall, Mr., ii. 500.
Southampton, iii. 503.
Southey, Robert, i. 265 ; iii. 656.
Spangenberg, Rev. Mr., i. 125, 420.
Sparrow, Samuel, iii. 117.
Spence, Robert, iii. 496, 539.
Spencer, William, ii. 11.
Spitalfields, ii. 534 ; iii. 25.
St. Agnes, i. 554 ; ii. 289, 361.
St. Austell, ii. 290 ; iii. 465, 587.
St. Helens, iii. 371.
St. Ives, i. 416, 453, 454. 554; ii. 87,
171, 218, 361, 587, 610.
St. Just, i. 489, 524; ii. 25, 87, 218,
289, 361.
Stafford, iii. 403, 411.
Stamp, John, iii. 573.
Stanhope, iii. 535.
Staniforth, Samson, ii. 487.
Stanton Harcourt, i. 174, 179.
Stationing Preachers, iii. 271, 339, 373,
418.
Stebbing, Rev. Dr., i. 240, 475.
Stennett, Dr., iii. 13.
Stephens, Joseph Rayner, iii. 462.
Stephens, William, i. 162, 164.
Sterne, Lawrence, ii. 369, 590; iii. 114.
Stevens, William, iii. 648.
Stewards, London, i. 422, 549.
Stockport, iii. 327.
Stockton, ii. 12, 120, 277, 330, 407 ;
iii. 412.
Stokesley, ii. 330.
Stonehouse, Rev. Mr., i. 179, 305, 514.
Stourport, iii. 602, 647.
Strangers' Friend Society, i. 11 ; iii.
252.
Stroud, ii. 500, 535 ; iii. 391, 410.
Sunday Schools, i. 10 ; ii. 534 ; iii.
414, 500, 522, 604.
Sunderland, i. 404 ; ii. 140, 277, 329,
618 ; iii. 48, 328, 336, 348, 474.
Suter, Alexander, iii. 497.
Swaddlers, i. 559.
Swearing, i. 502.
Sweden, Methodism in, iii. 66, 462.
Swedenborg, iii. 59, 407.
Swindells, Robert, ii. 2, 3, 29, 122,
129.
Syke House, i. 458.
Tadcaster, ii. 327, 330.
Taunton, i. 419 ; ii. 133 ; iii. 27, 211,
214.
Taxes, ii. 390 ; iii. 451.
Taylor, David, i. 10, 382, 3S3, 390,
426 ; ii. 42.
Taylor, Dr., ii. 18, 291, 294.
Taylor, Rev. Mr., iii. 431.
Taylor, Lsaac, i. 266.
Taylor, Jeremy, i. 35, 36.
Taylor, Joseph, iii. 391, 441, 549, 574-
Taylor, Thomas, iii. 9, 20, 177, 225,
227, 243, 246. 271, 284, 287, 292,
306, 334, 361, 496, 544, 606, 611,
643- .
Tea Drinking, i. 521.
Teetotalism, i. I17 ; iii. III.
Tennant, Thomas, iii. 224.
Terryhugan, ii. 303.
Teulon, Mr., iii. 17.
Tewkesbury, iii. 411.
Theatres, ii. 514.
Theological Institution, i. 543.
Thirsk, i. 544 ; ii. 567, 595 ; iii. 424.
Thom, William, iii. 6i2.
Thompson, Joseph, ii. 568 ; iii. 573.
Thompson, Rev. Mr., i. 458; iii. 384.
Thompson, Thomas, iii. 272.
Thompson, William, iii. 152, 606.
Thornton, Mrs., iii. 78.
Thorold, Sir John, i. 132, 478.
Thurot, Commodore, ii. 350.
Ticket, Unique Society, ii. 188.
Tipton, i. 406.
Tissot, Dr., ii. 345 ; iii. 57.
Tiverton, ii. 86, 87, 133; iii. 275.
Todmorden, ii. 141.
Told, Silas, i. 273 ; ii. 3S7 ; iii. 279.
Toltschig, John, i. 196.
Tomo Chichi, i. 114, 126.
Tompson, Richard, ii. 214.
Toplady, Rev. Augustus, ii. 315, 487
iii. 54, 81, 139, 158, 179, lyo, 210,
228, 232, 25S, 266.
Tottie, Rev. Dr., ii. 591.
Towcester, ii. 348.
Townsend, Rev. Joseph, ii. 604.
Tract Distribution, i. 496.
Tract Society, Methodist, i. 11; iii.
Tracts, Publication of, i. 505.
Trapp, Rev. Dr., i. 241, 329 ; ii. 63.
Tratham, David, ii. 129.
Trelawny, Sir Harry, iii. 339.
Trcmljath, John, i. 493, 558; iii. 385.
Trevecca, ii. 236.
Trcvecca College, iii. 34, 50, 8'3, 128,
255-
Tripp, Ann, ii. 289.
698
Index.
Troutbeck, Dr., ii. 8.
Trowbridge, ii. 190; iii. 338.
Ti-uro, ii. 449, 585 ; iii. 587.
Tucker, Rev. Dr., i. 244, 399.
Tullamore, ii. 4, 78, 303 ; iii. 269.
Tunstall, iii. 604.
Tyerman, Elizabeth, i. 486.
Tverman, Rev. Daniel, iii. 387.
Tyrell's Pass, ii. 2, 78, 353.
Ulverstone, ii. 69.
Union, i. 321 ; ii. 542.
Union, Clerical, proposed, ii. 508.
Union of Methodists, i. 51 1.
United Methodist Free Churches, i. 6.
Unthank, John, ii. 407.
Uxbridge, ii. 71.
Valton, John, iii. 337. 383, 552-
Vasey, Thomas, iii. 428.
Vegetarianism, i. 1 1 7, 525.
Venn, Rev. Henry, i. II ; ii. 186, 252,
337,412, 414, 448. 459, 541 ; iii. 18.
Visitors, Methodist, i. 353, 422.
Voltaire, iii. 58, 288.
Voltaire and Wesley contrasted, i. 44.
Vowler, Rev. Mr., ii. 279.
Wakefield, i. 440; ii. 12, 139; iii. 184.
Waldron, Isaac, ii. 387.
Walker, Rev. Samuel, ii. 207, 21 1,
244, 250, 279, 317, 414, 585.
Walpole, Horace, ii. 32, 72, 558.
Walpole, Sir Robert, i. 103, 136.
Walsal, i. 407 ; ii. 501.
Walsh, Thomas, i. 462 ; ii. 146, 147,
200, 202, 206, 239, 261, 273, 304,
534, 597-
"Wandsworth, ii. 25, 297.
Wanley, Dean, ii. 570.
Warburton, Bishop, i. 208 ; ii. 450,
454, 492, 519.
Ward, Elizabeth, ii. 407.
W'ard, Valentine, ii. 47 1.
Warminster, ii. I, 308.
Warne, Jonathan, iii. 139.
Warrener, William, iii. 441.
"Warrington, ii. 565 ; iii. 352.
"Watchnight, First, L 333.
Watchnight Service, iii. 252.
Waterford, ii. X47 ; iii. 153, 202.
Waterland, Rev. Daniel, i. 330.
Watson, Richard, i. 265 ; ii. 102.
Watteville, Baron, i. 196.
Watts, Dr., iii. 334, 346.
Weardale, ii, 406, 503, 569; iii. 123,
610.
Webb, Captain, ii. 546, 607 ; iii. 47,
451-
Webster, Rev. Dr., iii. 64, 3c 4.
Webster, Eleazer, i. 543.
Wednesbury, i. 406, 495 ; ii. 115, 348,
399, 501, 600 ; iii. 603.
IVdekly Miscellany, i. 250, 326, 358.
Welch, Thomas, iii. 399.
Wells, Samuel, iii. 302.
Welsh Cah'inistic Methodists, i. 4,
Wentworth, General, i. 493.
Wentworth House, iii. 475.
Wesley, Charles, jun. , iii. 345, 360.
Wesley, Mrs. Charles, ii. 35 ; iii. 654.
Wesley, Rev. Charles, i. 67, 117, 126-
128, 131, 137, 178, 179, i8i, 188,
210, 226, 229, 232, 253, 260, 264,
279, 295, 299, 302, 303, 310, 317,
324, 331, 336, 341, 343, 349, 404,
406, 407, 412, 416, 425, 437, 439,
440, 448, 458, 470, 487, 506, 538,
559 ; ii- 2, 6, 32-34, 40, 52, 73, 95,
101, 103, 107, 113, 118, 122, 127,
130, 137, 138, 143, 147, 172, 175,
189, 201, 206, 230, 244-253, 271,
307, 319, 357, 358, 361, 365, 381,
387, 388, 396, 4 '6, 431, 441, 448,
453, 459, 462, 487, 497, 506, 507,
511, 556, 562, 574, 595, 596, 602;
\\\. I, 5, 12, 92, 97, 100, 135, 171,
194, 204, 207, 222, 225, 233, 246,
257, 261, 296, 309, 312, 316, 330,
355, 376, 434, 439, 443, 478, 497,
522, 529, 562, 659.
Wesley Family, The, i. 16.
Wesley's Brother Samuel, i. 24, 29, 46,
133, 188-194, 252, 264, 286, 287.
Wesley's Father, i. 16, 30, 39, 41, 45,
98, 102, 103.
Wesley's First Convert, i. 49.
Wesley's Journals Commenced, i. 35.
Wesley's Marriage and Wife, ii. 101,
III-I15 ; iii. 20, 30, 84, 126, 207,
233, 365-
Wesley's Mother, i. 23, 26, 27, 29, 32,
34, 37-39, 127, 132, 285, 369, 390.
Wesley's Nephew Samuel, iii. 345, 361.
Wesley's Niece Sarah, iii. 356, 524,
622, 630, 650, 651, 655.
Wesley's Poetry, i. 47.
Wesley's Sister Emily, i. 33, 94, 424;
ii. 406.
Wesley's Sister Keziah, i. 99, 161.
Wesley's Sister Martha (Mrs. Hall), IL
406, 589 ; iii. 16, 567.
Wesley's Sister Mehetabel (Mrs. Wright),
ii. 74, 406.
Wesley's Will, in 1 768, iii. 15.
Wesley's Will, in 1789, iii. 616.
Wesleyan Methodism, i. 3.
Wesleyan Reform Union, i. 7,
West, Hon. James, ii. 234.
West Bromwich, i. 406 ; iii. 7, 290.
West Street Chapel, i. 421.
Westall, Thomas, i. 440, 453.
hidex.
699
Westminster jfournal, i. 473 ; ii. 397.
Whatcoat, Richard, i. 442 ; iii. 428.
\Vheatley, Benjamin, i. 543.
Wheatley, James, iL 121, 189, 309,
313. 325-
Wheatley, Rev. Charles, i. 240.
Whiston, Rev. Thomas, i. 325.
Whitaker, John, li. 410.
Whitby, ii. 409 ; iii. 68, 413, 538, 610.
Whitchurch, ii. 339.
White, Rev. George, ii. 15.
Whitefield, Rev. George, i. 68, 104,
108, 132, 141, 171, 179, 221, 226,
232, 233, 243, 247, 250, 252, 254,
269, 277, 311-316, 321, 322, 327,
336, 342, 344, 346-349. 372, 402,
414, 426, 437, 455, 470, 477, 506,
535 ; ii- 19, 22, 24, 32, 33, 42, 53,
68, 95, 118, 132, 137, 147, 150, 154,
156, 167, 175, 185, 209, 219, 223,
228, 234, 272, 297, 366, 371, 373,
396, 415, 416, 426, 431, 448, 459,
463, 470, 493, 497, 537, 548, 556,
562, 595, £08, 614 ; Iii. I, 34, 39,
60, 71, 76, 78, 85, 89, 255, 261.
Whitehaven, ii. 1 1 7, 504; iii. 411.
Whitehead, Dr., ii. 103, 474; iii. 16,
298, 616, 650, 651.
Whitelamb, Rev. John, i. 68, 389.
Whitfield, George, iii. 393, 557, 650.
Whitford, John, ii. 57, 187.
Wickedness, Abounding, i. 215, 503,
532 ; ii. 72.
Wickham, ii. 141.
Wigan, ii. 566 ; iii. 352, 371.
Wilberforce, William, iii. 115, 509,
650.
Wilder, Rev. John, i. 239.
Wilkes, John, iii. 37, 81, 145.
Wilkinson, Benjamin, ii. 411.
Williams, Rev. Joseph, i. 252, 536.
Williams, Robert, i. 429.
Williams, Thomas, i. 557 ; ii. 536.
Williams, William, ii. 481.
Williamson, William, i. 146, 149, 163.
Wills, Rev. Mr., iii. 431.
Winchel.>ea, iii. 566, O26.
Windsor, i. 174.
Windsor, Robert, ii. 189.
Winscomb, Jasper, iii. 546, 561, 601.
Winter, Cornelius, ii. 616 ; iii. 128.
Witchcraft, iii. II, 171.
Witness of the .Spirit, i. 190-195, 201,
207, 2S5, 552; ii. l68, 216, 491 ;
iii. 24, 57.
Witney, ii. 496.
Wogan, William, i. 138.
Wolfenden, Mrs., iii. 203.
Wolff, George, iii. 589, 599, 650.
Wolverhampton, ii. 399 ; iii. 7, 164,
493-
Wood, John, iii. 354.
Wood, Samuel, ii. 144.
Wooler, ii. 276.
Worcester, ii. 127; iii. 7, 647, 649.
Worksop, iii. 328.
Worship, Methodist, ii. 282, 576.
Wrangel, Dr., iii. 66.
Wray, James, iii. 546.
Wrestlingworth, ii. 311.
Wride, Thomas, iii. 466.
Wright, Duncan, ii. 569 ; iii. 362, 522.
Wroote, i. 57.
Wycombe, ii. 534; iii. 241, 251.
Yarm, ii. 12, 277, 408, 569; iii. 83.
Yarmouth, ii. 555, 615.
Yeadon, iii. 68.
Yearly Collection, iii. 5, 551.
Yewdall, Zechariah, ii. 471 ; iiL 338,
608.
York, ii. 120, 140, 214, 278, 327, 410,
500, 571 ; iii. 539, 606.
Yorkshire Methodism, ii. 608.
Zeal, Christian, iii. 346.
Zinzendorf, Count, i. 181, 196-198,
206, 298, 300, 339, 477 ; ii. 58, 88,
97, 116, 220.
VALUABLE RELIGIOUS ¥OMS
PUBLISHED BY
HARPER & BROTHERS, New York.
Harper & Brothers will send eitfur of the following works by mail, postage frtpaid,
to any part of the United States, on receipt of the price.
Barnes's Notes on llic New Testament.
New Edition. Revised, with Maps and Illustrations. Now ready : Gospels, 2
vols. ; Acts, I vol. ; Romans, i vol. ; First Corinthians, i vol. ; Second Corinth-
ians and Galatians, i vol. i2mo, Cloth, $l $0 per vol.
Barnes's Evidences of Christianity.
Lectures on the Evidences of Christianity in the Nineteenth Century. By Al-
bert Barnes. i2mo, Cloth, $i 75.
Robertson's Life and Works.
Harper's Complete Edition of the Life and Works of the Rev. F. W. Robert-
son, Incumbent of Brighton. In Two Volumes. $1 50 each.
ROBERTSON'S LIFE, LETTERS, LECTURES ON CORINTHIANS,
AND ADDRESSES. Complete in One Volume. With Portrait on
Steel. Large i2mo, 840 pages, Cloth, $i 50 ; Half Calf, $3 25.
ROBERTSON'S SERMONS. Complete in One Volume. With Portrait
on Steel. Large l2nio, 838 pages. Cloth, $1 50; Half Calf, $3 25.
Beecher's Morning and Evening Exercises.
Morning and Evening Devotional E.xercises : selected from the Published and
Unpublished Writings of the Rev. Henry Ward Bekcher. Edited by Ly.man
Abbott. With Portrait on Steel. Crown 8vo, Cloth, $2 00.
Beeclier's Sermons.
Sermons by Henry Ward Beecher, Plymouth Church, Brooklyn. Selected
from Published and Unpublished Discourses, and Revised by their Author.
In Two Volumes. With Steel Portrait by Halpin. 8vo, Cloth, $5 00.
Light at Evening Time:
A Book of Support and Comfort for the Aged. Edited by John Stanford
Holme, D.D. Printed from large type on toned paper, 4to, Cloth, Beveled
Edges, $2 50.
Cocker's Christianity and Greek Philosophy.
Christianity and Greek Philosophy ; or, the Relation between Spontaneous and
Reflective Thought in Greece and the Positive Teaching of Christ and his
Apostles. By B. F. Cocker, D.D., Professor of Moral and Mental Philosophy
in Michigan University. Crown 8vo, Cloth, $2 75.
Macgrcgor's Roh Roy on the Jordan.
The Rob Roy on the Jordan, Nile, Red Sea, and Gennesareth, &c. A Canoe
Cruise in Palestine and Egypt, and the Waters of Damascus. By J. Mac-
gregor, M.A. With Maps and Illustrations. Crown 8vo, Cloth, $2 50.
Valuable Religious Works.
Krummachcr's David.
David, the King of Israel : a Portrait drawn from Bible History and the Book
of Psalms. By Frederick William Krummacher, D.D., Author of " Elijah
the Tishbite," &c. Translated under the express sanction of the Author by the
Rev. M. G. Easton, M.A. With a Letter from Dr. Krummacher to his Amer-
ican Readers, and a Portrait. i2mo, Cloth, $i 75.
The Student's Old Testament History.
The Old Testament History. P>om the Creation to the Return of the Jews
from Captivity. Edited by William Smith, LL.D. With Maps and Wood-
cuts. Large i2mo, Cloth, $2 00.
Tlie Student's New Testament History.
The New Testament History. With an Introduction, connecting the History
of the Old and New Testaments. Edited by William Smith, LL.D. With
Maps and Woodcuts. Large i2mo, Cloth, ^2 00.
M'VVhorter's Hand -Book of the New Testament.
A Popular Hand - Book of the New Testament. By George Cummlng
M'Whorter. i6mo. Cloth, $i CO.
M'Clintoek and Strong's Cyclopedia.
Cyclopaedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature. By tlie late
Rev. John M'Clintock, D.D., and James Strong, S.T.D. With numerous
Maps and Illustrations. Vols. I.-IV., comprising the Letters A to J, are now
ready. Price per vol., in Cloth, $5 00 ; Sheep, $6 00; Half Morocco, $& 00.
The Land and the Book;
Or, Biblical Illustrations drawn from the Manners and Customs, the Scenes
and the Scenery of the Holy Land. By W. M. Thomson, D.D., Twenty-five
Years a Missionary of the A.B.C.F.M. in Syria and Palestine. With two elab-
orate Maps of Palestine, an accurate Plan of Jerusalem, and Several Hundred
Engravings, representing the Scenery, Topography, and Productions of the
Holy Land, and the Costumes, Manners, and Habits of the People. Two ele-
gant Large i2mo Volumes, Cloth, $$ 00; Sheep, $6 00; Half Calf, $S 50.
Southey's Wesley.
Life of John WesleV, and the Rise and Progress of Methodism. By Robert
SouTHEY, LL.D. With Notes by the late Samuel T. Coleridge, and Re-
marks on the Life and Character of John Wesley by the late Alexander
Knox. Edited by the Rev. Charles C. Southey, M.A. Second American
Edition, with Notes, &c., by the Rev. DANIEL CURRY, D.D. 2 vols., i2mo,
Cloth, $2 50.
Taylor's Wesley and Methodism.
By Isaac Taylor. i2mo, Cloth, $1 50.
Far a full list of Harper & Brothers' Publications, including many works of great
interest on Religious, Historical, and Social topics, as well as the most important
books of Travel and Adventure, see Harper's Catalogue, which will
be sent by mail on receipt of Six Cents in postage stamps.
VALUABLE STANDARD WORKS
FOR PUBLIC AND riUVATE LIBRARIES,
Published by HARPER & BROTHERS, New Yokk.
For a full List of Books suitable for Libraries, see Haeper & Brotuep.s' Teahe-
LiST arid Catalogue, which may be had gratuitously on ajjplication to tfie Pub-
lishers personally, or by letter enclosing Five Cents,
S^~ Harper & Brothers will send any of the following works by viail, postage prepaid,
to any part of the United Utates, on receipt of the price.
MOTLEY'S DUTCH REPUBLIC. The Rise of the Dutch Republic. By John Lo-
TURop MoTLEv, LL.D., D.C.L. With a Portrait of William of Orange. 3 vols.,
8vo, Cloth, $10 50.
MOTLEY'S UNITED NETHERLANDS. History of the United Netherlands : from
the Death of William the Silent to the Twelve Years' Truce— ICOi). With a full
View of the English-Dutch Struggle against Spain, and of the Origin and De-
struction of the Spanish Armada. By Jous Loturop Motley, LL.D., D.C.L.
Portraits. 4 vols., 8vo, Cloth, $14 00.
NAPOLEON'S LIFE OF C^SAR. The History of Julius Caesar. By His Imperial
Majesty Napoleon HI. Two Volumes ready. Library Edition, 8vo, Cloth, $3 50
per vol.
Maps to Vols. I. and II. sold siparately. Price $1 50 each, net.
HAYDN'S DICTIONARY OF DATES, relating to all Ages and Nations. For Uni-
versal Reference. Edited by Benjamin Vincent, Assistant Secretary and Keeper
of the Library of the Royal Institution of Great Britain ; and Revised for the
Use of American Readers. 8vo, Cloth, $5 00 ; Sheep, $6 00.
MACGREGOR'S ROB ROY ON THE JORDAN. The Rob Roy on the Jordan, Nile,
Red Sea, and Gennesareth, Ac. A Canoe Craise in Palestine and E''ypt, and the
Waters of Damascus. By J. Macgeegoe, M.A- With Maps and lllastratious.
Crowu 8vo, Cloth, $2 50.
WALLACE'S MALAY ARCHIPELAGO. The Malay Archipelago: the Land of the
Orang-Utau and the Bird of Paradise. A Narrative of Travel, 18.M-1S6'2. With
Studies of Man and Nature. By Alfred Russel Wallace. With Ten Maps
and Fifty-one Elegant Illustrations. Crown Svo, Cloth, $3 50.
WHYMPER'S ALASKA. Travel and Adventure in the Territory of Alaska, formerly
Russian America— now Ceded to the United States— and in various other parts of
the North Pacitic. By Frederick Whvmper. With Map and Illustrations. Crown
Svo, Cloth, $2 50.
ORTON'S ANDES AND THE AMAZON. The Andes and the Amazon : or. Across
the Continent of South America. By Jamfs Orton, M.A., Professor of Natural
History in Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, N. Y., and Corresponding Member of the
Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia. With a New Map of Equatorial
America and numerous Illustrations. Crown Svo, Cloth, $2 00.
WINCHELL'S SKETCHES OF CREATION. Sketches of Creation : a Popular View
of some of the Grand Conclusions of the Sciences in reference to the History of
Matter and of Life. Together with a Statement of the Intimations of Science
respecting the Primordial Condition and the Ultimate Destiny of the Earth and
the Solar System. By Alexanher Winciiell, LL.D., Professor of Geology,
Zoologv, and Botany in the University of Michigan, and Director of the State
Geological Survey. 'With Illustrations. 12mo, Cloth, $2 00.
WHITE'S MASSACRE OF ST. BARTHOLOMEW. The Maggacre of St. Bartholo-
mew: Preceded by a History of the Religious Wars in the Reign of Charles IX.
By Henry Wuitk, M.A. With Illustrations. 8vo, Cloth, $1 75.
2 Harper &* Brothers' Valuable Standard Works.
LOSSING'S FIELD -BOOK OF THE EEVOLUTIOX Pictorial Field-Book of the
Revolution; or, Illustrations, by Pen and Pencil, of the History, Biography,
Scenery, Relics, and Traditions of the War for Independence. By Bknson J.
LossiNO. 2 vols., Svo, Cloth, $14 00; Sheep, $15 00; Half Calf, $18 00; Full
Turkey Morocco, $22 00.
LOSSING'S FIELD-BOOK OF THE "U^AR OF 1S12. Pictorial Field-Book of the
War of 1S12 ; or, Illustrations, by Pen and Pencil, of the History, Biography,
Scenery, Relics, and Traditions of the Last War for American Independence. By
Benson J. Lossing. With several hundred Engravings on Wood, by Lossing and
Barritt, chiefly from Original Sketches by the Author. lOSS pages, Svo, Cloth,
$7 00 ; Sheep, $S 50 ; Half Calf, $10 00.
ALFORD'S GREEK TESTAMENT. The Greek Testament : with a critically revised
Text ; a Digest of Various Readings ; Marginal References to Verbal and Idio-
matic Usage ; Prolegomena ; and a Critical and Exegetical Commentary. For
the Use or Theological Students and Ministers. By IIenky Alford, D.D., Dean
of CanterlDury. Vol. L, containing the Four Gospels. 944 pages, Svo, Cloth,
$6 00 ; Sheep, $6 50.
ABBOTT'S FREDERICK THE GREAT. The History of Frederick the Second,
called Frederick the Great. By Joun S. C. Aujiott. Elegantly Illustrated. Svo,
Cloth, $5 00.
ABBOTT'S HISTORY OF THE FRENCH REVOLUTION. The French Revolu-
tion of 17S9, as viewed in the Light of Republican Institutions. By Joun S. C. An-
BOTT. With 100 Engravings. Svo, Cloth, $5 00.
ABBOTT'S NAPOLEON BONAPARTE. The History of N.ipoleon Bonaparte. By
Joun S. C. Ahisott. With Maps, W^oodcuts, and Portraits on Steel. 2 vols.,
Svo, Cloth, $10 00.
ABBOTT'S NAPOLEON AT ST. HELENA ; or. Interesting Anecdotes and Remark-
able Conversations of the Emperor during the Five and a Half Years of his
Captivity. Collected from the Memorials of Las Casas, O'Meara, Montholon,
Antommarchi, and others. By Joun S. C. Ajsbott. With Illustrations. Svo,
Cloth, $5 00.
ADDISON'S COMPLETE WORKS. The Works of Joseph Addison, embracing the
whole of the "Spectator." Complete in 3 vols., Svo, Cloth, $0 00.
ALCOCK'S JAPAN. The Capital of the Tycoon : a Narrative of a Three Years'
Residence in Japan. By Sir RnuF.RKoBi) Au;ook, K.C.B., Her Majesty's Envoy
ExtraordinarvaudMinis'ter Plenipotentiary iu Japan. With Maps and Engravings.
2 vols., ]2mo,"Cloth, $3 50.
ALISON'S HISTORY OF EUROPE. First Series : From the Commencement of
the French Revolution, in 1789, to the Restoration of the Bourbons, in 1815. [ Iu
addition to the Notes on Chapter LXXVI., which correct the errors of the
original work concerning the United States, a copious Analytical Index has beeu-
appended to this American edition.! Second Series : From the Fall of Napoleon,
in 1815, to the Accession of Louis Napoleon, in 1852. 8 vols., Svo, Cloth, $10 00.
BALDWIN'S PRE-HISTORIC NATIONS. Pre-Historic Nations ; or, Inquiries con-
cerning some of the Great Peoples and Civilizations of Antiquity, and their
Probable Relation to a still Older Civilization of the Ethiopians or Cushites of
Arabia. By John D. Baldwin, Member of the American Oriental Society,
12ino, Cloth, $175.
PARTH'S NORTH AND CENTRAL AFRICA. Travels and Discoveries in North
and Central Africa: being a Journal of an Expedition undertaken under the
Auspices of H. B. M.'s Government, in the Years 1849-1855. By Henky Bartii,
Ph.D., D.C.L. Illustrated. 3 vols., Svo, Cloth, $12 00.
HENRY WARD BEECHER'S SERMONS. Sermons by Henry Ward Beeoher,
Plymouth Church, Brooklyn. Selected from Published and Unpublished Dis-
courses, and Revised by their Author. With Steel Portrait. Complete in 2 vols.,
Svo, Cloth, $5 00.
LYMAN BEECHER'S AUTOBIOGRAPHY, &o. Autobiography, Correspondence,
&c., of Lyman Beecher, D.D. Edited by his Son, Ciiari.es Beecher. With Three
Steel Portraits, and Engravings on Wood. In 2 vols., 12mo, Cloth, $5 00.
BOSWELL'S JOHNSON. The Life of Samuel Johnson. LL.D. Including a Journey
to the Hebrides. By James Boswei.t., Esq. A New Edition, with numerous
Additions and Notes. By John Wu-bon Choker, LL.D., F.R.S. Portrait of
Boswell. 2 vols., Svo, Cloth, $4 00,
Harper 6^ Brotlicrs Valuable Standard Works. 3
DRAPER'S CIVIL WAR. History of the American Civil War. By Joun W. Dra-
I'KR, M.D., LL.D., Professor of Chemistry and Physiology in the University of
New Yorli. lu Three Vols. 8vo, Cloth, ^i 50 per vol.
DRAPER'S INTELLECTUAL DEVELOPMENT OF EUROPE. A History of the
Intellectual Development of Europe. By John W. Duai-kk, M.D., LL.D., Profess-
or of Chemistry and Physiolojjy iu the University of New York. Svo, Cloth, $5 (lO.
DRAPER'S AMERICAN CIVIL POLICY. Thonsrhts on the Futnre Civil Policy of
America. By John W. Dkai'eu, M.D., LL.D., Professor of Cliemistry and Physiol-
ogy in the University of New York. Crown Svo, Cloth, $2 50.
DU CHAILLU'S AFRICA. E.xplorations and Adventures in Equatorial Africa : with
Accounts of the Manners and Customs of the People, and of the Chase of the (io-
rilla, the Crocodile, Leopard, Elephant, Hippopotamus, and other Animals. 13y
Pacl 1!. Do CuAii.LtJ. Numerous Illustrations. Svo, Cloth, $5 00.
BELLOWS'S OLD WORLD. The Old World in its New Face : Impressions of Eu-
rope iu 1S67-186S. By Henuy W. Bellows. 2 vols., 1-imo, Cloth, $3 60.
BRODIIEAD'S HISTORY' OF NEW YORK. History of the State of New Y'ork.
By Jou.N- RoMEYN Bkodueaij. 1G09-10'J1. 2 vols. 8vo, Cloth, $3 00 per vol.
BROUGHAM'S AUTOBIOGRAPHY. Life and Times of Henuv, Lord Beocgiiam.
Written by Himself. In Three Volumes. 12mo, Cloth, $2 00 per vol.
BULWER'S PROSE WORKS. Miscellaneous Prose Works of Edward Bulwer.
Lord Lytton. 2 vols., 12mo, Cloth, $3 50.
BI'LWER'S IIOR.\CE. The Odes and Epodes of Horace. A Metrical Translation
into Ensrlish. With Introduction and Commentaries. By Loud Lytton. With
Latin Text from the Editions of Orelli, Macleaue, and Y'onge. 12mo, Cloth, $1 75.
BULWER'S KING ARTHUR. A Poem. By Eaul Lytton. New Edition. 12mo,
Cloth, $1 75.
BURNS'S LIFE AND WORKS. The Life and Works of Robert Burns. Edited
by Robekt CuAMiiERS. 4 vols., 12rao, Cloth, $6 00.
REINDEER, DOGS, AND SNOW-SHOES. A Journal of Siberian Travel nnd Ex-
plorations made in the Y'ears lS05-'67. By Ricuakd J. Bush, late of the Russo-
American Telegraph Expedition. Illustrated. Crown Svo, Cloth, $3 00.
CARLYLE'S FREDERICK THE GREAT. History of Fricdrich 11., called Frederick
the Great. By Tuomas Carlyle. Portraits, Maps, Plans, &c. C vols., 12mo,
Cloth, $12 00.
CARLISLE'S FRENCH REVOLUTION. History of the French Revolntion. Newly
Revised by the Author, with Index, &c. 2 vols., 12mo, Cloth, $3 50.
CARLYLE'S OLIVER CROMWELL. Letters and Speeches of Oliver Cromwell.
With Elucidations and Connecting Narrative. 2 vols., 12mo, Cloth, $3 50.
CHALMERS'S POSTHUMOUS WORKS. The Posthumous Works of Dr. Chalmer.s.
Edited by his Sou-iu-Law, Rev. William Hanna, LL.D. Complete in U vols.,
12mo, Cloth, $13 50.
COLERIDGE'S COMPLETE M'ORKS. The Complete Works of Samuel Taylor
Coleridge. With an Introductory Essay upon his Philosophical and Theological
Opinions. Edited bv Professor Siiedh. Complete in Seven Vols. With a fine
Portrait. Small Svoi Cloth, $10 60.
eURTIS'S HISTORY OF THE CONSTITT'TION. History of the Origin, Formation,
and Adoption of the Constitution of the United States. By Geoeoe Tioknob
CcKTis. 2 vols., Svo, Cloth, $0 00.
DOOLITTLE'S CHINA. Social Life of the Chinese : with some Account of their Re-
ligions, Governmental. Educational, and Business Customs and Opinions. With
special but not exclusive Reference to Fuhchau. By Rev. Jistih Doolitti.e,
Fourteen Y^ears Member of the Fuhchau Mission of the American Board. Illus-
trated with more than 150 characteristic Engravings on Wood. 2 vols., 12nio,
Cloth, $5 00.
GIBBON'S ROME. History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. By Ed-
ward GiitHON. With Notes by Rev. H. H. Mii.mav and M. Gt izot. A new cheap
Edition. To which is added a complete Index of the whole Work, and a Portrait
of the Author. 6 vols., 12mo, Cloth, $9 00.
4 Haj'per &= Brothers^ Valuable Standard Works.
HARPER'S NEW CLASSICAL LIBRARY. Literal Translations.
The following Volumes are now ready. Portraits. 12mo, Cloth, $1 50 each.
C JiS AE. — Virgil. — S at.lust. — Horace.— C iceko's Okations. — Ciokeo's Offioepj
ifec. — CioEEO ON Oratory ani> Orators. — Tacitus ("i vols.). — Terence. —
SoPuocLES. — Juvenal. — Xenopiion. — Homer's Iliad Homer's Odyssey. —
Herodotus. — Demosthenes. — Tuucvuides. — .^Escuylus.— Eueipldes (2 vols.).
— LiVY (2 vols.).
DAVIS'S CARTHAGE. Carthage and her Remains : being an Account of the Exca-
vations and Researches on the Site of the Phcenician Metropolis in Africa and other
adjacent Places. Conducted under the Auspices of Her Majesty's Government.
Bv Dr. Davis, F.R.G.S. Profusely Illustrated with Maps, Woodcuts, Chromo-
Lithographs, &c. Svo, Cloth, $4 OU.
EDGEWORTH'S (Miss) NOVELS. With Engravings. 10 vols., 12mo, Cloth, $15 00.
GROTE'S HISTORY OF GREECE. 12 vols., 12mo, Cloth, $18 00.
HELPS'S SPANISH CONQUEST. The Spanish Conquest in America, and its Rela-
tion to the History of Slavery and to the Government of Colouies. By Arthub
Helps. 4 vols., 12mo, Cloth, $6 00.
HALE'S (Mrs.) WOMAN'S RECORD. Woman's Record ; or, Biographical Sketches
of all Distinguished Women, from the Creation to the Present Time. Arranged
in Four Eras, with Selections from Female Writers of each Era. By Mrs. Sarah
Josepua Hale. Illustrated with more than 200 Portraits. Svo, Cloth, $5 00.
HALL'S ARCTIC RESEARCHES. Arctic Researches and Life among the Esqui-
maux: being the Narrative of an Expedition in Search of Sir John Franklin, in
the Years ISOO, 1S61, and 1S62. By Charles Francis Hall. With Maps and 100
Illustrations. The Ilhistrations are from Original Drawings by Charles Parsons,
Henry L. Stephens, Solomon Eytinge, W. S^ L. Jewett, and Grauville Perkins,
after Sketches by Captain Hall. Svo, Cloth, $5 00.
HALLAM'S constitutional history of ENGLAND, from the Accession of
Heury VIL to the Death of George IL Svo, Cloth, $2 00.
HALLAM'S LITERATURE. Introduction to the Literature of Europe during the
Fifteenth, Sixteenth, aud Scvcuteeuth Centuries. By Uenuy IIallam. 2 vols.,
Svo, Cloth, $4 00.
HALLAM'S MIDDLE AGES. State of Europe during the Middle Ages. By Henry
Hallam. Svo, Cloth, $2 00.
IIILDRETH'S HISTORY OP THE I^HTED STATES. First Series : From the
First Settlement of the Country to the Adoption of the Federal Constitution.
Second Series: From the Adoption of the Federal Constitution to the End of
the Sixteenth Congress. C vols., Svo, Cloth, $1S 00.
HUME'S HISTORY OF ENGLAND. History of England, from the Invasion of Ju-
lius Cffisar to the Abdication of James II., IGSS. By David Hume. A new Edi-
tion, with the Author's last Corrections and Improvements. To which is Prefix-
ed a short Account of his Life, written by Himselil With a Portrait of the Au-
thor. 6 vols., 12mo, Cloth, $9 00.
JAY'S WORKS. Complete Works of Rev. William Jay: comprising his Sermons,
Family Discourses, Morning and Evening Exercises for every Day in the Year,
Family Prayers, &c. Author's enlarged Edition, revised. 3 vols., Svo, Cloth,
$6 00.
JEFFERSON'S DOMESTIC LIFE. The Domestic Life of Thomas Jefferson : com-
jiiled from Family Letters and Reminiscences by his Great-(Jran<ldauL'hter,
Sarah N. Randolpu. With Illustrations. Crown Svo, Illuminated Cloth, Bev-
eled Edges, $2 50.
JOHNSON'S COMPLETE WORKS. The Works of Samuel Johnson, LL.D. With
an Essay on his Life and Genius, by Aetuue Mukpuy, Esq. Portrait of Johnson.
2 vols., Svo, Cloth, $4 00.
KINGLAKE'S CRIMEAN WAR. The Invasion of the Crimea, and an Account of
its Progress down to the Death of Lord Raglan. By Alexander William King-
lake. "With Maps and Plans. Two Vols, ready. i2mo, Cloth, $2 00 per vol.
KINGSLEY'S WEST INDIES. At Last: A Christmas in the West Indies. By
Cuaeles Kingsley. Illustrated. 12mo, Cloth, $1 50.
Harper 6^ Brothers' Valuable Standard Works. 5
KUUMMACHER'S DAVID, KINCi OP ISKAKL. David, the Kinj; of Israel : a Por-
trait drawn from Bil)l(- Ili.-^torv and tlie Hook of IValnis. liv Fkkhkeiok William
Kkd.mma<uiei!, D.D., Author of " Klijah tlie Tislibitc," &c. "Translated under the
express Sanction of the Autlior l)y the Kev. M. G. Ea.ston, M.A. Willi a Letter
from Dr. Krummacher to his Aniericau Headers, and a Portrait. I'Jmo, Cloth,
$1 T6.
LAMB'S COMPLETE WORKS. The Works of Charles Lamb. Comprising his Let-
ters, Poems, Essays of Elia, Essays upon Shakspeare, Hoi,'arth, Ac., and a Sketch
of his Life, with the P'iual Memorials, by T. Noon Tali-olud. Portrait. 2 vols.,
12mo, Cloth, $3 00.
LIVINGSTONE'S SOUTH AFRICA. Missionary Travels and Researches in South
Afiica; iucUidint; a Sketch of Sixteen Years' Residence in the Interior of Africa,
and a Journey from the Cape ofGoou Hope to Loando on the West Coast; thence
across the Continent, down the River Zambesi, to the Eastern Ocean. By Davih
Livingstone, LL.D., D.C.L. W'ith Portrait, Majis by Arrowsmith, and numerous
Illustrations. 8vo, Cloth, $4 50.
LIVINGSTONES' ZAMBESL Narrative of an Expedition to the Zambesi and its
Tributaries, and of the Discovery of the Lakes Shirwa and Nyassa. 1S'J,S-1RC4.
By David and CuAutEs Livimgstone. With Map and Illustrations. 8vo, Cloth,
$5 00.
M'CLINTOCK & STRONG'S CYCLOPEDIA. Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological,
and Ecclesiastical Literature. Preitared by the Itev. Joun M'Cli.ntook, D.D.,
and James Steono, S.T.D. 3 vols, now rcadij. Ko\al Svo. Price per voL, Cloth,
$5 00 ; Sheep, $6 00 ; Half Morocco, $S 00.
MARCY'S ARMY LIFE ON THE BORDER. Thirty Years of Army Life on the
Border. Comprising Descriptions of the Indian Nomads of the Plains ; Explo-
rations of New Territory; a Trip across the Rocky Mountains in the Winter;
Descriptions of the Ilabits of Difl'ereut Animals found in the West, and the Meth-
ods of Hunting them ; with Incidents in the Life of Different Frontier Men, &c.,
&c. By Brevet Brigadier-General R. B. Marov, U.S.A., Author of " The Prairie
Traveller." With numerous Illustrations. Svo, Cloth, Beveled Edges, $3 00.
MACAULAY'S HISTORY OF ENGLAND. The History of England from the Ac-
cession of James II. By Tuomas Bahington Maoaclav. With an Original Por-
trait of the Author. 5 vols., Svo, Cloth, $10 00 ; 12mo, Cloth, $7 50.
MOSHEIM'S ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY, Ancient and Modern ; in which the
Rise, Progress, and Variation of Church Power are considered in their Coimec-
tiou withlhe State of Learning and Philosophy, and the Political History of Eu-
rope during that Period. Translated, with Notes, &c., by A. Maclatne, D.I).
A new Edition, continued to 1826, by C. Coote, LL.D. 2 vols., Svo, Cloth, $4 00.
NEVIUS'S CHINA. China and the Chinese : a General Description of the Country
and its Inhabitants; its Civilization and Form of Government; its Relisfious anil
Social Institutions ; its Intercourse with other Nations ; and its Present Condition
and Prosy^ects. By the Rev. John L. Nevus, Ten Years a Missionary in China.
With a Map and Illustrations. 12mo, Cloth, $1 75.
OLIN'S (Dr.) life AND LETTERS. 2 vols., 12mo, Cloth, $3 00.
OLIN'S (Dk.) travels. Travels in Egypt, Arabia PetriEa, and the Holy Land. En-
gravings. 2 vols., Svo, Cloth, $3 00.
OLIN'S (Dr.) works. The Works of Stephen Clin, D.D., late President of the Wes-
leyan University. 2 vols., l'2mo. Cloth, .$3 00.
OLIPHANT'S CHINA AND JAPAN. Narrative of the Earl of Elgin's Mission to
China and Japan, in the Years 1^57, '&S, '5'.». By Lai kenoe Olii-iiant, Private
Secretary to Lord Elgin. Illustrations. Svo, Cloth, $3 50.
OLIPHANT'S (Mrs.) LIFE OF EDWARD IR^aNG. The Life of Edward Irving,
Minister of the National Scotch Church, London. Illustrated by his Journals and
Correspondence. By Mrs. Olipuant. Portrait. Svo, Cloth, $3 60.
RAWLINSON'S MANUAL OF ANCIENT HISTORY. A Manual of Ancient His-
tory, from the Earliest Times to the Fall of the Western p:mpire. Comprising
the History of Chaldxa, Assyria, Media, Babylonia, Lydia. PhtEuicia, Syria, Ju-
diea, Egypt, Carthage, Persia. Greece, Macedonia, Parthia, and Rome. By
George Rawlinson, M.A., Camden Professor of Ancient History in the Univer-
sity of Oxford. 12ino, Cloth, $2 50.
Harper 6^ Brothers'' Valuable Standard Wot-ks.
KECLUS'S THE EARTH. The Earth : a Desoiiptive History of the Phenomena and
Life of the Glol)e. By Elisee Keolus. Translated by the late B. B. Woodward,
and Edited by Henry Woodward. With 234 Maps and Illustrations, and 23 Pago
Maps printed in Colors. Svo, Cloth, $5 00.
POETS OP THE NINETEENTH CENTURY. The Poets of the Nineteenth Century.
Selected and Edited by the Rev. Roukkt Akis Wii.i.mott. With English and
American Additions, arranged by Eveut A. Duyckinck, Editor of " Cyclopedia
of American Literature." Comprising Selections from the Greatest Authors of
the Age. Superbly Illustrated with 132 Engravings from Designs by the most
Eminent Artists. In elegant small 4to form, printed on Superfine Tinted Pajier,
richly bound in extra Cloth, Beveled, Gilt Edges, $0 00; Half Calf, $6 00; Full
Turkey Morocco, $10 00.
SHAKSPEARE. The Dramatic Works of William Shakspeare, with the Corrections
and Illustrations of Dr. Jounson, G. Steevens, and others. Revised by Isaac
Reed. Engravings. G vols., Royal 12mo, Cloth, $9 00.
SMILES'S LIFE OF THE STEPHENSONS. The Life of George Stephenson, and
of his Son, Robert Stephenson ; comprising, also, a History of the Invention and
Introduction of the Railway Locomotive. By Samcei, Smiles, Author of "Self-
Help," &c. With Steel Portraits and numerous Illustrations. Svo, Cloth, $3 00.
SMILES'S HISTORY OF THE HUGUENOTS. The Huguenots : their Settlements,
Churches, and Industries in England and Ireland. By Samuel Smiles. With au
Appendix relating to the Huguenots in America. Crowu Svo, Cloth, $1 75.
SPEKE'S AFRICA. Journal of the Discovery of the Source of the Nile. By Cap-
tain John Hanning Speke, Captain H. M. Indian Army, Fellow and Gold Med-
alist of the Royal Geographical Society, Hon. Corresponding Member and Gold
Medalist of the French Geographical Society, &c. With Maps and Portraits and
numerous Illustrations, chiefly from Drawings by Captain Gkant. Svo, Cloth,
uniform with Livingstone, Barlh, Burton, &c., $4 00.
STRICKLAND'S (Miss) QL^EENS OF SCOTLAND. Lives of the Queens of Scot-
land and English Princesses connected with the Regal Succession of Great Brit-
ain. By Agnes Stkicklanu. 8 vols., 12ino, Cloth, $12 00.
THE STUDENT'S SERIES.
France. Engravings. 12mo, Cloth, $2 00.
Gibbon. Engravings. 12mo, Cloth, $2 00.
Greece. Engravings. 12mo, Cloth, $2 oo.
Hume. Engravings. 12mo, Cloth, $2 00.
Rome. By Liddell. Engravings. 12mo, Cloth, $2 00.
Old Testament History. Engravings. 12mo, Cloth, $2 00.
New Testament History. Engravings. 12mo, Cloth, $2 00.
Strickland's Queens of EnglarTd. Abridged. Engravings. 12mo, Cloth, $2 00.
Ancient History of the East. 12mo, Cloth, $2 00.
Hallam's Middle Ages. 12mo, Cloth, $2 00.
Lyell's Elements of Geology. 12mo, Cloth, $2 00.
TENNYSON'S COMPLETE POEMS. The Complete Poems of Alfred Tennyson,
Poet Laureate. With numerous Illustrations by Eminent Artists, and Three
Characteristic Portraits. Svo, Paper, 75 cents ; Cloth, $1 25.
THOMSON'S LAND AND THE BOOK. The Land and the Book; or. Biblical Illus-
trations drawn from the Manners and Customs, the Scenes and the Scenery of
the Holy Land. By W. M. Thomson, D.D., Twenty-live Years a Missionary of tlie
A.B.C.F.M. in Svria and Palestine. With two elaborate Maps of Palestine, an ac-
curate Plan of Jerusalem, and several hundred Engravings, representing the Scen-
ery, Topography, and Productions of the Holy Land, and the Costumes, Manners,
and Habits of the People. 2 large 12mo vols.. Cloth, $5 00.
TYERMAN'S WESLEY. The Life and Times of the Rev. John Wesley, M. A., Found-
er of the Methodists. By the Rev. Luke Tyeuman, Author of "The Life of Rev.
Samuel Wesley." Portraits. 3 vols.. Crown Svo.
VAMBERY'S CENTRAL ASIA. Travels in Central Asia. Being the Account of a
Journey from Teheran across the Turkoman Desert, on the Eastern Shore of the
Caspian, to Khiva, Bokhara, and Samarcand, performed in the Year ISi;:!. By
Aemintus Vamhery, Member of the Hungarian Academy of Pesth, l)y whom ho
was sent on this Scientific Mission. With Map and Woodcuts. Svo, Cloth, $4 50.
WOOD'S HOMES WITHOUT HANDS. Homes Without Hands: being a Descrip-
tion of the Habitations of Animals, classed according to their Principle of Con-
struction. Bv J. G. Wool., M.A., FL.S. With about 140 Illttstiations. Svo,
Cloth, Beveled Edges, $4 50.
BX
84-9 ^5
W5T8
V.3
Tyerman, Luke
The life and times of the
^v, John l^esley
PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE
CARDS OR SLIPS FROM THIS POCKET
UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO LIBRARY
.-.■4-n' v;v;:-^-w*!i;^^!V^^
.<$fop>
-mm
; '_■ '_ ■: < ■' /^ Juya;.': j..^<;rt,<i
»!J«*S»>5»>4*V<i*!*-^>^^
i